Skip to main content

Full text of "Autobiographical notes and a bibliography of the scientific publications of Joel Asaph Allen"

See other formats


MUSE UM 


NATURAL | 
HISTORY AY 


fet, 


Pim Yar Ute 
SS $ ——_ \\ \ 
= a 22 Ea \ ee Ne 
SS OOS 1G . e xt 4 
\ F Pa 3 
4 P PA Y 
A \ ; | ( 
L\ 


x 
“- 
V 
2 
| 
< 
ee 
4 O 
at 


‘i 
hal 


anny a 
ns hi 


eae 


Pog 


i 
yah 


Puy 7 


at. mo 
‘eee 
ar 
a ei 
hey Hei 


\ 


a 
y 


AR 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES 
A BIBLIOGRAPHY 
SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS 


JOEL ASAPH ALLEN 


PUBLISHED BY THE MUSEUM 
NEW YORK 
1916 


DEDICATED TO 
Henry FAarrFieELD OSBoRN, 
President of the American Museum of Natural History, 
and to the Memory of my revered Teacher, 
Louis AGASSIZ. 


iii 


Pons f 
wean i 
1 4 
* 4 
4 
1 : o 
j| 
! 4 
‘ 5) 
+ 
\ f i 
) 
~ 
i 
< 
i 
j fe ¥ f 
> 
; ; . 
Z 
H 
y B Se 
“ey P ; 
if eh fi 
¥ n ‘ om 
a 
; rs » 
~ - . 
‘ . on oe) * 
a eens i 
t e ans 
‘ ‘ " 
2 i 
, ‘ 
, r 
L 
’ < } 
| 
i 
, \ 
; -~ 
‘ rz) 
cd 
J i 
7 


4 Oi n fe 
of CR 
nye aaah ee 


\e 


rien 
SIM 


fe 
bien 
a p 


FOREWORD. 


The life and writings of Joel Asaph Allen have exerted so great an in- 
fluence on the progress of ornithology and mammalogy in America that all 
who have the interests of these branches of science at heart, both in this 
country and abroad, will welcome this biographical and_ bibliographical 
volume. It is issued as an expression of the appreciation of Doctor Allen’s 
life work by the Trustees of The American Museum of Natural History 
and his devoted colleagues on its Scientific Staff. The biographical sketch 
was especially desired in connection with the Bibliography because it sets 
forth so clearly the broad groundwork of travel, of field observation and 
of field record which has established a model for all modern American work 
on the birds and the mammals. At this time we are sure that naturalists 
in all parts of the world will unite with Dr. Allen’s colleagues in felicitating 
him on the great work which he has accomplished and in wishing him many 
more years of strength and activity. 


Henry FAIRFIELD OSBORN. 
November 9, 1916. 


ay. 


v VA / 
at 
\ ' 
=i 
, i 
rn , 
- 
, 
i 


on o iy 
, as ke i 
wr 
5 
; aon) 
ty * 
= 
3] 
z 
i. Ae ~ i 
wy : ‘1 1 o, 
: ty } k 
y ea ; t 
wd} : 
- \ { f , 
Py ae ‘ 
Ey 
re EN 
: 2 
d 1 
° Bx 
Pict) P 
t en 
i 
{ a q 
i ¥ 
‘ 
‘ 
; ’ 
‘ He 
x 
i 
a 5 
‘ 4 
\ > 
ii 
1 ' y t 
f . 
ey 
, id ia 
: . 
1 
ra he 
Sy U 
sy Moy 


ae 


stat 
4 
‘t 


gl 
a ee 


ee 


PREFACE. 


The present publication was prepared by request of HENRY FAIRFIELD 
Oszorn, President of the American Museum of Natural History, to whom 
the author is indebted for courtesies extending over many years of the most 
pleasant official relationship. 

It is a pleasure, realized by few, to be able to supervise the publication 
of a list of one’s own technical papers, extending over more than half a 
century, and the opportunity for it was duly welcomed. 

The biographical sketch, preceding the list of papers, however, was 
written with great reluctance and with many misgivings, as being, in the 
author’s opinion, inopportune in the present connection. If such notes 
are worthy of record, it seems more fitting that their publication should be 
posthumous. Their present appearance is due to solicitations difficult to 
disregard. 


| J. A. ALLEN. 
August 20, 1916. 


gk ‘ a Wanye 
; é . 
eS : 
‘ = 
\ 
: i yuan ~ 
Pa i f "i 
3 f i 
if z 
4 
es 
. 
x 2. 
ss ‘ 4 ' “ 
2 : : 
p f ; 
i) = ; 
A 4 ; 
oe es ‘ 
s . ; : 
° A 
=> : ; 
‘i 
‘ | 
j — 
= ¥ ¢ . 
; f 
' 
A ae 
x x 2. a . 
p Le? 
e: ie 
. ; : r . 
ree u 
x 
i 4 
; ° 
> 
; + 
cd 
on : 
r es 
Beet ; sit “a 
, ; 
’ t ; RY é 
= - 
sah 
‘ s 
: et 
\ 
i \ hi 
A ¥ 
| Mk eae 
4 is 
. 
i 
Aub 
j 
> y 
a 
ue 
u ‘ 
silat 
Pe ; 
y 
7 
¥ 
’ 
' o* ‘ | 


CONTENTS. 


Title-page 
Dedication 
Foreword (by Henry Fairfield Osborn) 
Preface . ; ; , 
Contents 
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL Nonne 
Early surroundings and faite (1838-1858) : 
At Wilbraham Academy and home studies (1858-1862) 
Special student under Louis Agassiz (1862-1871) 
With the Agassiz Expedition in Brazil (1865) 
Collecting trip to the Middle West (1867) 
East Florida Expedition (1868-1869) : 
Assistant at Museum of Comparative Zodlogy (187 1-1885) 
Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Expedition (1871-1872) 
Yellowstone Expedition (1873) é 
Special collaborator, U. S. Geological and Georraphienl Sunvey of 
the Territories (1876-1882) : 
Curator at American Museum of Natural EnGtOEye (einige 1885) 
Affiliations with the American Ornithologists’ Union and other scientific 


societies (since 1883) 


General considerations and home life ince 1874) 


Addenda 
Eepeditions 
Positions held 


Honors received (including Snernberlipact in fore and Racca 
Societies and Academies of Science) 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Mammals 

List of titles 

New higher groups 

New genera and subgenera 

New species and subspecies 

Index to Mammals 
Birds 

List of titles 

New genera 

New species and ECnoeties 
Reptiles, list of titles 
Zodgeography, list of titles 
Evolution, list of titles . 
Nomenclature, list of titles 
Biography, list of titles 
Miscellaneous, list of titles 
Editorial work 


a 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


re 
iy Ae 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 
EARLY SURROUNDINGS AND TRAINING (1838-1858). 


I was born in Springfield, Massachusetts, July 19, 1838, the eldest son 
of Joel and Harriet (Trumbull) Allen, both of early New England stock. 
My father was a descendant, in the seventh generation, of Samuel Allen, 
who settled in Windsor, Connecticut, in 1640. The date of his birth is not 
positively known, nor has a definite record been found of when he emigrated 
from England. He is supposed to have come over with the Dorchester 
Company in 1630, in the ship ‘Mary and John.’! The Windsor land 
records show that he received a grant of land from the plantation at Windsor, 
Connecticut, January 27, 1640. He died at Windsor in 1648. The present 
public library building at Windsor marks the site of the Samuel Allen 
homestead. Joel Allen, my father, was born in Springfield, Massachusetts, 
December 11, 1810. 

On the maternal side the descent is from John Trumbull, great-grand- 
father of Governor Jonathan Trumbull (said to have been the original 
“Brother Jonathan” and familiar friend of Washington), who was born in 
Newcastle-on-Tyne, England, and settled in Roxbury, Massachusetts, in 
1639. 

My immediate progenitors were farmers. My father, however, learned 
the carpenter’s trade and was a house-builder in his earlier days, but later 
bought a farm on which he spent the greater part of his life. He was 
respected by his neighbors as a man of excellent judgment and sterling 
integrity, whose advice was often solicited in the affairs of the neighborhood. 
In politics he was a Free-soiler, and later a Republican. He died January 
9, 1886, at the age of 75 years and one month, survived by my mother, 
three sons and a daughter. My mother died June 2, 1892, at the age of 
80 years and six months. My mother taught school for several years 
before her marriage. She was a true helpmeet, practical, conscientious, 
and in every way lovable and inspiring. My father had little appreciation 
for my natural history tastes, but was kind and generous, offering to share 
his farm with me if I would remain with him on the old homestead. My 
mother, on the other hand, was much in sympathy with my yearnings, and 
often used her influence in my favor. 


1 The first leaves of the Dorchester records are stated to be missing. 
1 


2 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Our family numbered five children, one girl and four boys, one of whom 
(a boy, Edwin) died in infancy. My sister, Harriet Emma, taught school 
for a number of years and later married a farmer. She died suddenly of 
pheumonia, contracted in attending a sick brother, April 2, 1900, in her 
54th year. My two brothers, Edgar, a moulder by trade, and Irving, a 
farmer, are still (August, 1916), living, the latter at the old homestead in 
Springfield. | 

My early trainmg was rigidly puritanical. My parents were both 
members of the Congregational church, and strict in their religious ob- 
servances. Family prayers invariably followed breakfast, and also closed 
the routine of Sunday, all the religious requirements of the day being strictly 
observed. 

My earliest recollections are naturally associated with the surroundings 
of my birthplace on the old farm, situated on a hill about a mile and a half 
east of the then thickly settled part of Springfield, known as the Watershops, 
where the United States Government has for more than a century carried 
on the manufacture of fire-arms. The family home was a large two-story 
square-roofed house, at that time innocent of paint and unshaded by trees. 
One of the pleasantest remembrances of my younger days is of helping my 
father plant the row of maples and elms which long since became the promi- 
nent feature of the road frontage of the farm, and in recovering and painting 
the house. We were not crowded by neighbors, the nearest residence on 
the west being half a mile away, and there was only one house within half 
a mile to the eastward. Subsequently others much nearer were built in. 
both directions, the lonely country road has become Allen Street, and a 
trolley car line has been projected to connect the rapidly extending. suburbs 
with the business portion of the city. 

Dandelions and daisies and other wild flowers were early attractions, 
the profuse gathering of which at an early age led my elders, and particularly 
my mother, to predict that when the toddling youngster grew up he would 
favor the profession of medicine, and I was often facetiously dubbed “ Dr. 
Sykes,” in allusion to our then family physician, an herb-doctor of local 
reputation. In due time I was assigned a share in the household chores, and 
trained to perform the allotted tasks with promptness and care. 

The nearest schoolhouse was a mile distant, of the conventional red 
type, situated as usual on the crest of a hill. In summer the school was 
taught by a schoolmistress, while the winter session was conducted by a 
schoolmaster selected for his ability to keep the larger boys in order as well 
as to teach the “three Rs.” Some years later a schoolmistress was em- 
ployed for both the winter and summer sessions. In these days the services 
of boys of even six and seven years were considered too valuable for farm- 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 3 


work to be sacrificed in summer for school purposes, so that to them only 
the winter session of the school year was available. 

Despite hard work and long hours, the farm proved attractive and 
satisfying for a time, but at about the age of fourteen the love inspired by 
this free contact with natural surroundings developed a desire to know more 
of the animal and plant life, the soil and the rocks, and the ever changing 
phenomena of sky and air, than could be gained merely by association. 

At the age of thirteen, after much pleading on my part, to my great 
delight, my father presented me with a gun. At first it merely afforded 
the pleasure all boys experience in being able to shoot something, either as 
game or on the pretext that certain birds and animals are destructive to 
crops, and that it is desirable to reduce their numbers. But very soon the 
destructive instinct gave place to a desire to possess specimens for study, 
particularly of birds, which I found were so numerous in kinds that com- 
paratively few of them were known by name to any of the people, either 
of town or country, whom I met. Warblers, vireos, kinglets, sparrows 
and many other kinds of birds were shot, measured, weighed, described 
and given provisional names in my notebooks, so that I might again recog- 
nize them when met with, long before I knew that books had been written 
about them and that they all had names, Latin as well as English. I even 
made attempts to draw and color them, but entire lack of instruction in the 
work led only to failure and disappointment. A little later, however, I 
made the acquaintance of Bradford Horsford, a teacher of drawing, who 
was also an amateur ornithologist and taxidermist, with a good knowledge 
of all the commoner birds. From him I borrowed a copy of the Brewer 
edition of Wilson’s ‘American Ornithology,’ which, to my unspeakable 
delight, he later sold to me; Nuttall’s and Audubon’s works on North 
American birds were also found in the public library of Springfield, and a 
new world was opened to me! 

A little later I made the acquaintance of a man of broader education 
than I had ever before met, who taught our district school for several 
winter terms, and became a resident of the neighborhood. As he was a 
nature-lover himself he could appreciate my aspirations, and most gener- 
ously presented me with a copy of Blythe’s ‘Cuvier’s Animal Kingdom,’ 
a work of which I previously had never heard. Thus equipped, and with 
the resources of a public library now at my command, acquaintance with 
not only the local birds, mammals, reptiles and fishes, but with many of the 
insects, became a delightful experience. Interest in farm work as an 
occupation as rapidly declined, but a filial desire to share fully in the femily 
burdens led to no neglect of duties but often to excessive effort in manual 
labor to demonstrate an interest otherwise unfelt. 


4 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


In winter I usually attended the district school, but was so far in advance 
of all the other pupils that I was in a class by myself in most of the branches 
taught, and received little aid from the teacher. A large part of my last 
term in the district school was devoted to solving the “miscellaneous © 
examples”’ at the end of Greenleaf’s higher arithmetic, then commonly in 
use in the schools of the region, and in such other school arithmetics as I 
could borrow from friends who had long since finished their school days. 
One winter was spent entirely at home (I was then probably in my fifteenth 
year), in the study of such natural history books as I could command, and 
of a borrowed copy of Webster’s unabridged dictionary, from which I 
copied a large part of the natural history definitions. 


At WILBRAHAM ACADEMY AND HoME SrupiEs (1858-1862). 


Then followed several winter terms at the Wilbraham Academy where 
I selected my own studies, which included at first physiology, natural 
philosophy, astronomy, and chemistry, in addition to English grammar and 
arithmetic; later rhetoric, algebra, Latin, French and German were sub- 
stituted for the natural sciences. Humboldt’s ‘Cosmos’ (in English), and 
works of similar character constituted my favorite reading outside of my 
school work. 

My summers were still spent on the farm, where, equipped with ele- 
mentary works on meteorology, geology and mineralogy, I had ample food 
for thought. Lyell’s ‘Principles of Geology,’ Dana’s ‘Mineralogy,’ the 
‘Proceedings’ of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 
(the full series as far as then published), and various State geological and 
natural history reports were studied with avidity. 

During this period my ever present ambition was to write a history of 
the “Birds of New England” that should be as complete and exhaustive 
as possible, and based on original observation, mcluding the necessary 
explorations in northern New England where so many of the migratory 
species were supposed to pass the breeding season. Next to this I looked 
upon editorial work as an enviable goal. Yet at the time these aspirations 
began to develop composition was a slow and difficult task, and to acquire 
facility in writing I forced myself to keep a daily journal, in which I re- 
corded not only the current weather conditions in detail but every incident 
of my daily experiences that seemed to offer a subject for comment. 

In Professor Oliver Marcy, teacher of the natural sciences at Wilbraham 
Academy and later professor and finally dean of the faculty at Northwest- 
ern University, I found a most sympathetic friend and counsellor. It was 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 5 


he who first secured my introduction to the public through the ‘New Eng- 
land Farmer.’ It was my custom at the Academy to offer, when composi- 
tion day came round, some of the results of my natural history observations 
as a composition. One of my first offerings of this sort was a summary of 
my weather journal for the previous seasonal period of three months. 
When the time came for the return of compositions mine was witbheld 
with the request from Professor Marcy, who had charge of my division, 
that he might retain it for a short time. A few days later he handed me a 
copy of the ‘New England Farmer’ containing my article, printed in full 
and without change, with a very complimentary introduction by the editor. 
It was to me an exceedingly great surprise, and sufficient explanation of 
why my composition had not been returned to me at the usual time. I 
was at this time about eighteen or nineteen years of age. 

With this cordial welcome from the editor of the ‘Farmer,’ I mustered 
courage to offer, soon after, other contributions of a similar character, my 
weather reports thereafter appearing at regular intervals till circumstances 
prevented the continuation of the observations. These articles were 
followed (in 1859) by others on quite different subjects, including a series 
of twenty-five on New England birds; also a paper on the moon’s alleged 
influence upon the weather, in reply to previous articles on the subject by 
other contributors. My article was based on meteorological observations 
kept at the United States Armory at Springfield, Mass., for a long period of 
years, latterly by Mr. Joseph Weatherhead, who kindly placed them at my 
disposal for study. It is needless to say that I found no evidence of lunar 
influence on the character of the weather, and no basis for sundry other 
assumptions regarding the moon’s influence on mundane life, or for popular 
beliefs respecting the proper time in the moon for weaning pigs, colts and 
calves or planting crops. 

During these years I spent much time studying botany, adding a col- 
lection of dried plants to my other natural history gatherings, nearly all of 
which I was able to identify without other aid than Gray’s well-known 
“Manual of the Botany of the Northern United States,’ my copy of which 
eventually became well annotated with my field notes. At this time I had 
not the acquaintance of any one who had any knowledge of the scientific 
names of plants, or who, so far as I knew, cared to know them. JI still 
recall the exquisite pleasure it gave me to discover the name of some wild 
plant I had long admired in total ignorance of its affinities or name. 

During the years 1859-1861, I collected and mounted (as attested by my 
catalogue, still extant) some 300 birds, representing nearly 100 species, 
and also such native mammals as I could find near my home, and I pre- 
served in jars of alcohol specimens of all the reptiles, amphibians and fishes; 


6 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


such mollusks as were available were also gathered and several hundred 
insects. Best of all, I knew the technical names of nearly all except the 
insects, of which, however, I knew many. The local minerals and rocks 
found place on the shelves of my little museum, for which a small room was 
kindly provided by my parents, and which I equipped with shelves and a 
flat table case for insects. In addition there were rows of bottles containing 
the products of my boyish experiments with such cheap chemicals as I could 
afford to purchase at the neighboring drug stores, each duly labeled with its 
proper chemical formula. The whole was amateurish in the extreme, and 
represented merely a superficial acquaintance with a wide range of subjects, 
but enough to add immensely to the pleasure of living, giving, as it did, the 
sense of being in touch with the plant and animal life and the geological 
features of my immediate environment. My notebooks contained pages 
of descriptions of unusual atmospheric phenomena, from the prismatic 
tints of fleecy clouds floating past the midday sun, haloes, unusual storm 
conditions, auroral displays, and the August and November shooting-star 
periods, to the varied forms of the snow crystals of a winter storm — things 
for the most part unobserved by my friends and neighbors, and which 
hence gave them no added joy to living. 

It is needless to say that my interest in every day practical affairs was 
limited to a conscientious and cheerful discharge of the obligations natural 
to my position as a helper to my father in the routine of farm work. Every 
spare moment of the day when in the house was spent in my room poring 
over books or specimens or jotting down things seen out of doors in the 
corn or hay field. These constant disappearances when off duty were 
naturally an annoyance to my father, who could not appreciate my ab- 
sorption in such unpractical affairs. To the oft-made inquiry of my Father, 
“Where’s Asaph?” was Mother’s gentle response, “upstairs,” and the 
contemptuous paternal rejoinder: “Upstairs; he’s always ‘upstairs.’”’ 
Although unappreciative of his son’s “foolish notions,’ he was not harsh 
or unkind, as an agreement, lasting for several seasons, granting one day 
a week for the prosecution of my hobbies is ample evidence. For these 
foibles my mother had always a degree of sympathy, which increased as 
years passed to active influence in their behalf. 

To demonstrate my hearty interest in forwarding the farm work, I 
often as I afterwards found, exerted myself beyond my proper physical 
endurance, which with the absorption in my natural history work told 
heavily on my health. It was often necessary in the busy season for my 
father to employ day laborers and it was always my ambition to “lead the 
field,” which I was always able to do except in the heavier work, even when 
a young boy just entering the teens. My evening task, before retiring, was 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. rf 


to write in my journal the notes of the day and to change the dryers in my 
extemporized botanical press, consisting of several pieces of thick board, 
cut the proper length, a lot of old newspapers, and a heavy, smoothly 
waterworn stone for the top of the pile to afford the requisite pressure. 
Many, many a time this bedtime task found me almost too exhausted by 
the day’s labor to accomplish. These long periods of overwork undoubtedly 
laid the foundation for much of the semi-invalidism of many later years. 

There was, of course, respite in seasons when farm work was not pressing, 
when much spare time could be found for collecting trips and the prepara- 
tion of specimens. My excursions were generally limited to the radius of a 
few miles from the farm, adjoining which, in my early days, were a few 
small patches of virgin forest. But the ax had already begun to thin their 
ranks, and before my collecting days had fairly begun, these grand old 
remnants of former forest conditions were swept away and the land devoted 
to farm purposes or allowed to grow up in a shrubby second-growth. 

My excursions extended to the famous new-red sandstone quarries in 
East Longmeadow, my first visit to which is still vividly remembered. . 
Other trips were made to Mount Tom, with boon companions — sportsmen 
who had become amateur taxidermists and enthusiastic general collectors 
of birds, beasts, fishes, reptiles and insects, for the Springfield Museum of 
Natural History, under the auspices of the City Library Association.! 
One memorable trip of several weeks duration was made to visit relatives 
in Windsor County, Vermont. The physical character of the country 
was in strong contrast with that of my home surroundings, and the fauna 
and the flora were perceptibly different. Most interesting of all the many 
excursions in this new field was the ascent of Mount Ascutney, and many 
samples of the rocks of the general region visited were taken home for my 
cabinet. A second trip to this region, made in August of a later year, 
included a visit to the gold washings at Springfield (Vermont), where I 
spent a night in camp and gained much valued information respecting the 
methods there employed in securing the precious gold dust and diminutive 
nuggets that barely paid for the time and labor expended. 

My several terms at Wilbraham Academy prior to the winter of 1861-62 
had been a serious draft upon my father’s limited resources, with interest 
still to be met on farm mortgages and a considerable family to support, 
and, eager as I was for such advantages, I could not consent to accept his 


1 These men were Caleb W. Bennett, a house and sign painter, who will receive later mention in 
this narrative; Solomon Stebbins, a paper hanger; and Charles Emery, a draughtsman at the U. S. 
Armory at Springfield. Their leisure time was holidays and Sundays, which they intelligeatly and 
enthusiastically devoted to natural history collecting, and their evenings to the study and preparation 
of specimens for exhibition in the Springfield Museum. 


8 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


further aid. I had my little museum, so dear to me that it had seemed 
impossible to part with it under any circumstances. In this emergency 
it occurred to me to offer to sell the collection to Wilbraham Academy, and 
use the proceeds for my school expenses. To my surprise as well as delight, 
the offer of sale was accepted, and to this extent my way was clear. 


SPECIAL STUDENT UNDER Louis Aaassiz (1862-1871). 


On again entering the Academy I found a congenial spirit, whose tastes 
and aspirations were similar to my own, but under better guidance, as my 
new friend ' was a nephew of my loved teacher, Professor Marcy. He was 
planning to enter the Lawrence Scientific School at Cambridge, to become 
a pupil of the great Agassiz. Why should not I do the same? The balance 
still due me for my collection, if paid to me in cash would enable me to 
establish myself at Cambridge, on our proposed plan of hiring an inex- 
pensive room and boarding ourselves. The necessary preliminaries having 
been arranged, we arrived in Cambridge early in February, 1862. I well 
remember plodding through the knee-deep snow of Divinity Avenue to 
reach the Agassiz Museum, in exceedingly inclement weather, and our 
cordial greeting by the great scientist. Plans for laboratory work were at 
once arranged, and also for attending certain of the courses of lectures at 
the Lawrence Scientific School that were to form a part of our curriculum. 
Besides those of Agassiz himself we were to attend the course by Jeffries 
Wyman on comparative anatomy, a course on physics by Joseph Lovering, 
a course on chemistry by Josiah P. Cook, and the course on botany by Asa 
Gray, all eminent specialists of world-wide renown. 

I had naturally chosen as my specialty the study of birds, and was 
not a little disappointed at having assigned to me the same task as that 
set for Mr. Niles. We were both given collections of corals of several 
genera and requested to find out their methods of growth and laws of 
development. Not a hint was given us as to what details we were to 
look for, and no books of reference were suggested. The first lesson, we 
were told, was to learn to observe, to use our eyes. Equipped with hand 
lenses, we proceeded to our task. After a few hours of application we were 
asked “Well, what have you seen?” and the same query was daily repeated. 
We reported what we thought we had discovered, and if we had seen aright 
we were encouraged with a few words of approval; if we were mistaken 


1 William Harmon Niles, of Worthington, Mass., later for many years professor of Geology and 
Physical Geography at the Boston Institute of Technology. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. g 


the reply was “You are wrong; you must look again; you must learn to 
see.” 

We were not left, however, without friendly words of intercourse about 
other matters. The great master was engaged with his own work in the 
same room, which was in the southeast corner of the first floor of the first 
section of the Museum, of which this was at that time the only part con- 
structed. Agassiz was then engaged in studying the great DeKonink and 
other large collections of fossil mollusks, at that time recently received and 
not fully unpacked. From time to time he gave expression to his delight 
over some new discovery, and to the trays containing the specimens and 
their labels were frequently added new labels of his own, on which the name 
of a new genus or a new species was written, as the case might be. His. 
workroom, or laboratory, was almost daily the resort of eminent scientists: 
Jules Marcou was almost a daily visitor, when the conversation was always 
in French; Jeffries Wyman was a frequent caller, as was also Benjamin 
Pierce, the eminent mathematician; on the days when Agassiz gave his 
lectures many distinguished notables from Boston were present, among 
whom was frequently Oliver Wendell Holmes. 

Besides Agassiz and his French artist Bourkhart and ourselves, the 
room was occupied by the osteological preparator Guggenheim, with whom 
conversation was always in German. For many years this old German 
worked at preparing fish skeletons for the Museum, whose eccentricities 
of dress and habits will be long remembered by the Agassiz students of that 
early day. He was an inveterate smoker and snuff-taker, wore a wig, and 
made his midday coffee amid the débris of his work. 

Time at first passed slowly with the two new students. They had been 
given a difficult problem, and weeks passed with little progress in its solu- 
tion. It was a trial of persistence, of character, as well as of keenness of 
observation, a test to show whether the interest of the student was real or 
imagined. While our efforts were at times disheartening in their results, 
perseverance and continued application won the day. Gradually we saw 
the light and were able to show, each in his particular problem, the succes- 
sive stages of growth in the young coral, and discovered the law governing 
the multiplication of plates in the successive stages of growth. We were 
then given other subjects to study, Mr. Niles taking up crinoids, while I was 
given a large miscellaneous collection of fossil gastropods to assort and 
arrange according to their relationships. We were both happy, having 
been assured by our great teacher that we were making good progress in 
“learning to observe.” 

Soon, however, I contracted a bad case of measles, which ended in 
serious impairment of my eyes, from which I suffered for years after. For 


10 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


some six months it was impossible for me to read ordinary print, and for 
several years I could not use my eyes for evening study. 

I returned to my Springfield home early in May, equipped with tanks 
of alcohol (the well known ‘Agassiz tanks’) for the preservation of speci- 
mens. Although in wretched health, suffering from chronic indigestion as 
well as from weak eyes, I collected over four hundred specimens of animals, 
chiefly vertebrates, and largely birds, besides taking a share in the farm 
work. 

On my return to the Museum in the autumn I ventured to express my 
strong desire to study birds. The condition of my eyes, however, was a 
great handicap. The mammals and birds were in charge of A. E. Verrill, 
then a student at the Museum (later professor of zodlogy for many years 
at Yale University), who was requested to assign me material for study. 
The collection of birds consisted at that time of several hundred skins 
(possibly a thousand or two, all North American), and several thousand in 
alcohol, nearly all uncatalogued and the alcoholics unidentified. I began 
with the identification and cataloguing of the alcoholics, which occupied 
most of my time for many months, and really extended over years, as 
new collections came in. I soon acquired facility in recognizing birds in 
obscure plumages after long storage in alcohol, their feathers wet and 
colors disguised. It was, therefore, good training in the art of “learning 
to see.” My weak eyes, however, prevented study at night, and even the 
little writing required in entering specimens in the catalogue often entailed 
much suffering. I attended numerous courses of lectures, but my progress 
in acquiring further knowledge of languages, so essential to a scientific 
student, was for a considerable time at a standstill. 

At this time, by direction of Professor Agassiz, I took up the study: of 
Pterylography, with the aid of C. L. Nitzsch’s classic ‘System der Ptery- 
lographie’ (Halle, 1840), and made many preparations in illustration of the 
subject from both fresh and alcoholic material, with a view to the publica- 
tion of an extended illustrated monograph of the Pterylography of the Owls. 
Illness, however, retarded the work, and other interests and duties inter- 
vening, it was never completed. But the investigation proved of great use 
to me in subsequent work in ornithology.' 

Thus the time passed during the next two years and a half, my vacations 
being spent at home collecting specimens for the Agassiz Museum. For 


1 Professor Agassiz thus refers to the subject in the Annual Report of the Museum of Comparative 
Zoodlogy for the year 1863, p. 17: ‘‘Ill health has also taken away Mr. Allen from his field of labors. 
I regret it the more since he has made excellent progress in Ornithology and promised to become a 
valuable assistant in the arrangement of the specimens of birds. He has left unfinished a very interest- 
ing investigation upon the structure and arrangement of the feathers of birds.” 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. ila 


assistance rendered in cataloguing and in other routine work at the Mu- 
seum, a monthly allowance was received sufficient for my necessary living 
expenses, together with a furnished room in the Museum dormitory, known 
as ‘Zoological Hall,’ at that time the home of the student assistants of the 
Museum. ; 

During the summer of 1864 I made a trip to Sodus, Wayne County, 
N. Y., where several weeks were spent with relatives. The region, border- 
ing Lake Ontario, was originally heavily forested, and some of the virgin 
forest still remained. The type of country was new to me and intensely 
interesting. A large collection of the land and fresh-water mollusks was 
gathered and eagerly studied, and a few insects, mammals and birds were 
collected, including a few species of both mammals and birds I had not 
before seen in life. 


With the Agassiz Expedition in Brazil (1866). 


During the winter of 1864-65, Professor Agassiz’s usual vigorous health 
began to give way under the strain of years of incessant‘work and care, so 
that a change of scene and some degree of relaxation became imperative. 
A generous Boston friend of means (Nathaniel Thayer) suggested his mak- 
ing a journey to Brazil, and offered to provide the means not only for his 
own expenses but also for a small corps of assistants. This kind offer he 
accepted. It was then early in March, 1865, and the expedition was to 
start as soon as the necessary preparations could be made. On March 12 
he asked me if I would like to join the expedition. Naturally I accepted 
the unexpected invitation, and was instructed to join three other Museum 
assistants who had also been invited to accompany the expedition, and 
meet him, with them, at a designated place in Boston to arrange for our 
passports. Thus suddenly opportunity opened to us for exploration in a 
distant land. We left Boston for New York on the evening of March 26, 
and sailed for Rio de Janeiro on April 2, on the steamship ‘Colorado,’ of 
the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. The ‘Colorado’ was a new vessel, 
of 2000 tons, then regarded as remarkably large and luxuriously furnished. 
This was her maiden voyage, and Professor Agassiz and his party of six- 
teen persons were the only passengers. 

As we passed down the coast of Virginia, on April 3, heavy masses of 
smoke were seen over the western horizon, which the Captain of the ‘Colo- 
rado’ believed to indicate a distant battlefield. But it was not till May 16 
that news of the fall of Richmond reached us in Brazil and confirmed the 
Captain’s surmise that the smoke we saw on April 3 was from a great battle 
— the closing contest of the civil war. 


14 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Early in the voyage Professor Agassiz began a series of lectures, which. 
was continued almost daily till we reached Rio de Janeiro, dealing in turn. 
with the Gulf Stream, the Sargosso Sea, embryology, and the classification. 
of the animal kingdom. We arrived at Rio April 22, after an exceptionally 
pleasant voyage. 

Save for a few excursions, by rail or boat, to near points, the whole 
party remained at Rio for several weeks, but work was organized imme- 
diately on our arrival and collections of specimens were gathered daily 
in the surrounding suburbs. At the same time preparations were under 
way for the various projected expeditions into the interior that were to oc- 
cupy us the rest of the year. Besides the six trained assistants from the 
Museum, as many other young men were attached to the expedition as 
volunteers; all were duly assigned positions on the different exploring 
parties. 

Following several short excursions from Rio, including a two weeks’ trip. 
to Mendez and the Barra do Parahyba, on the Dom Pedro II railroad, 
some 60 miles from Rio, I was assigned to one of the parties that was to 
visit the northern Provinces of Brazil. We left Rio de Janeiro June 9 for 
Petropolis, a beautiful mountain suburb of Rio, where we spent the night.” 
The following morning we resumed our journey by a mule-drawn stage for 
Juiz da Fora, over a perfect road, making the 100 miles in ten hours, with 
relays of mules every ten miles. The road traversed a highly picturesque 
section of country, parts of it clothed with verdure of almost Amazonian 
luxuriance, while flocks of toucans and large parrots frequently attracted 
attention. 

At this point we were to outfit for our long journey into the wilderness; 
but instead of finding our equipment of mules and camarados awaiting us,. 
as we had expected (it having been ordered in advance), our animals were: 
still at distant ranches and nothing was in readiness. It required five days 
to assemble the mules and their drivers. It was June 15 when our little 
cavalcade of 14 mules, 4 horses, and 4 camarados left Juiz da Fora for the 
headwaters of the Rio das Velhas, some 300 miles distant. 

We reached Barbacena on the third day, where Mr. Ward with his share: 


1 The personnel of the Expedition, in addition to Professor Agassiz, was as follows: Assistants: 
from the Museum staff: John G. Anthony, conchologist; Charles Frederick Hartt, geologist; Orestes: 
H. St. John, geologist; George Sceva, osteologist; J. Burkhardt, artist. Volunteers: William James,. 
later the eminent psychologist of Harvard University; Edward Copeland, Newton Dexter, James. 
Hunnewell, S. V. R. Thayer, and Thomas W. Ward. D. Bourget, a French naturalist, joined the Ex- 
pedition at Rio de Janeiro. 

2 Our party consisted of Orestes H. St. John (geologist and chief), George Sceva, Thomas W. Ward 
(mineralogist), and myself. We were to travel together, however, for only a short distance, as Mr. 
Ward was to leave the party at Barbacena and Mr. Sceva at Lagoa Santa. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 13 


-of the cavalcade left us for Diamantina. We were delayed here several 
days while Mr. Sceva made a fruitless side-trip to some limestone caves 
at San José to prospect for fossil bones. We resumed the journey on the 
24th, reaching Morro Velho July 7 and Lagoa Santa July 18, much of the 
way by obscure and difficult roads. Here we spent several days, collecting 
‘specimens and visiting the famous bone caverns! made classic by the 
Danish naturalist, Dr. P. W. Lund, who was still resident at Lagoa Santa 
and whom we had the pleasure of meeting. Six days later we reached 
‘Trahiras, on the Rio das Velhas, where we disposed of our animals and 
outfitted with a large canoe and boatmen for the voyage down the river. 
‘This involved another delay of eight days although our river equipment 
had been ordered in advance and was supposed to be awaiting our arrival. 
But the delay had its advantages, for it enabled us to repack the collections 
‘we had made en rowte for shipment to the United States and gave oppor- 
tunity for making a large collection of fishes, besides obtaining many birds 
and mammals. We received here also our first letters from home, letters 
that had taken three months to reach us. 

We were able to secure a boat well adapted to our needs, a canoe 50 feet 
in length and four in width, dug out of a single tree. This we rigged with 
outriders and covered with canvas to protect us from the sun by day and 
afford shelter at night. We named her the ‘Gequitibé,’ an Indian name 
borne not only by the tree from which it was made, but by the fazenda and 
village from which we outfitted. We also supplied ourselves with a smaller 
canoe to serve as a tender. Our crew consisted of four boatmen, a cook, 
and an English boy we had previously secured at Morro Velha, with St. 
John and myself, making eight persons in all. 

Our journey from Juiz da Fora (distant about 120 miles from Rio) by 
pack train to Gequitibé (or Trahiras), on the upper Rio das Velhas, was 
made in twenty days of actual travel, the distance by our circuitous route 
being about 300 miles, but the time occupied in outfitting for the two jour- 
neys, and in various delays en route was much more, so that the time be- 
tween our arrival at Juiz da Fora and our departure down the river was 
about 50 days (June 9-July 31). 

On July 31 we left Trahiras to descend the river, reaching its junction 
(Barro do Rio das Velhas) with the Rio Sao Francisco August 28. Our pro- 
gress was greatly delayed by the low stage of water rendering the numer- 
ous rapids difficult, and in some instances dangerous, to pass. Nearly every 
day we lost several hours in exploring for channels that would permit the 


1 Mr. Sceva was left here to make further exploration, but his search for fossils was poorly re- 
warded. 


14 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


passage of our boat, and had several narrow escapes from shipwreck. 
These delays gave opportunity to explore the adjacent country and to make 
collections, particularly of birds, frogs, fishes and mollusks. The river is 
very tortuous, particularly in its upper course, where it occasionally returns 
on itself in great loops. The distance by land between Barro do Rio do 
Gequitiba, our point of departure, and Barro do Rio das Velhas is said to 
be 55 leagues or about 220 miles, and about 350 miles (estimated) by the 
river. Our journey down the river, we were told, was one of the quickest 
and most successful ever made at such a low stage of water, it being accom- 
plished in twenty-one days, without having to unload the boat or losing any 
baggage. We were fortunate in our choice of boat, as with an ajojo (two 
boats lashed together) we should certainly have been wrecked in passing 
rapids, and with a barca (house boat) have been repeatedly forced to un- 
load our freight. We had also an excellent crew of boatmen, who often 
took to the water and guided the boat by hand through dangerous passes. 
We remained three days at the Barra, where we were obliged to get a 
relay of boatmen, and left September | for Januaria, arriving there Septem- 
ber 9. The Rio Sao Francisco is about twice the size of the Rio das Velhas 
and unobstructed by rapids; we were hence able to make good progress, 
though at times delayed by strong head winds. While at the Barra we 
made very satisfactory collections, but spent much time in unsuccessful 
efforts to obtain barrels and spirits for our specimens, which we had in- 
tended to send from this point to Rio Janeiro for shipment to Cambridge. 
Consequently we were obliged to take them with us, in the hope of being 
able to send them to the coast for shipment home via Bahia or Pernambuco. 
During the three months since we left Rio de Janeiro it had become 
evident that my physical condition rendered it impracticable for me to 
attempt to carry out the journey as originally planned, namely, to descend 
the Rio Sao Francisco to the Barra do Rio Grande and then cross the divide 
to the headwaters of the Rio Parahyba do Norte and thence reach the coast 
in Ceara. After long consultation we decided to divide our party, Mr. 
St. John to attempt to complete the journey as originally planned, while I 
was to remain a short time at Januaria and then continue down the Sao 
Francisco to a point from which it would prove practicable to make an 
overland journey to Bahia. : 
In accordance with this plan Mr. St. John left Januaria in our small 
canoe, with one man, September 14, with the alternative in mind that 
should it prove impracticable to make the Ceara portion of the journey he 
was to join me again at Barra do Rio Negro for the overland trip to Bahia. 
Pluck and perseverance enabled him to carry out the original schedule of 
the expedition, though short of funds and finally seriously ill with fever. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 15 


I remained at Januaria till the 19th (ten days in all), having in the 
meantime sold our big canoe and hired a barca for the descent of the Sao 
Francisco, discharged our old boatmen and engaged others, repacked our 
collections for the journey to Bahia, and made several excursions into the 
neighboring country, which resulted in important accessions to our natural 
history collection and many pages to my field notes. 

The journey down the Rio Sao Francisco was made comfortably, save 
for excessive heat (maximum daily temperature 80-98° Fahr.), and without 
untoward incident beyond frequent delays by heavy head winds and by 
illness of the boatmen. I decided to terminate the river journey at the 
village of Chique-Chique, which point we reached in the afternoon of 
October 8, the descent from Januaria to this point having occupied 18 days. 
Chique-Chique is 530 miles below Januaria and about 580 miles from Bahia, 
by the overland route. 

The region about Chique-Chique is excessively arid and the heat intense. 
It was near the beginning of the rainy season, which had already set in 
further in the interior, as shown by the slight daily rise of the river during 
my descent from Januaria. In fact, nearly the whole journey from Lagoa 
Santa to this point was made just in advance of the rainy season, occasional 
showers at different points indicating its near approach. 

It was necessary for me to remain several weeks at Chique-Chique for 
an opportunity to join a pack-train bound for the coast, there being con- 
siderable traffic between this point and Bahia. The caravans, however, 
depart infrequently and at uncertain intervals. The route was by way of 
Jacobina, Arraial do Riacho, Jacuhipe, Villa da Feira da Sta. Anna, and 
Cachoeira. 

The country between Chique-Chique and the coast at Bahia presents 
three natural regions, which are plateaus, differing widely from each other 
in their geological features. The first is excessively arid and extends from 
the Rio Sao Francisco to Jacobina, a distance of rather more than 200 
miles. It is a vast limestone plain, practically without inhabitants, so that 
it was necessary to take with us not only food for the animals as well as the 
men, but also drinking water, which was carried in large leather water bags, 
as in parts of the Far East. This plain rises gradually toward the east, 
culminating in the Taboleira de Jacobina. To the eastward the descent 
to the Jacobina valley is abrupt, through a narrow precipitous defile known 
as the Tombador (the tumble-down). Almost vertical walls of rock, nearly 
a thousand feet in height, surround the head of the valley. 

The second or middle plateau likewise has a breadth of some 200 miles, 
extending from Jacobina eastward to the Sierra da Terra Dura, a point 
midway between Jacobina and Cachoeira, at the head of Bahia Bay. The 


16 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


underlying rock is gneiss, with vast exposures of bare rock, and with nowhere 
more than a very thin covering of soil. Slight knolls and shallow basins 
alternate, with rarely a difference in altitude of more than twenty or thirty 
feet. Many of the hollows form shallow lakes in the rainy season, from 
which most of the water evaporates in the dry season. At frequent inter- 
vals there are circular holes in the rock, called by the natives caldeiraos, 
which I found on examination to be genuine pot-holes, some of them of 
great size (the largest one measured was 20 feet in diameter). 

A considerable descent is made in passing from the middle to the eastern 
or coast plateau, which is characterized — at least along our route of travel 
— hy the general absence of rock exposures and heavy superficial deposits 
of sand, doubtless from the abraded plains to the westward. The whole 
region between the Sao Francisco and the sea is covered, generally speaking, 
with low open forest, or catinga, except for a narrow belt along the coast, 
where a moister atmosphere permits a more luxuriant growth. The whole 
area presents a barren aspect, the vegetation being dwarfed and scanty and 
the aridity excessive. The greatest aridity and the highest temperature 
occurs in the limestone district, where little or no moisture is precipitated 
for nine months in the year, and where all the herbaceous vegetation an- 
nually withers. Cacti occur in great variety, including arboreal forms of 
gigantic proportions. With the exception of a few species, the trees are 
leafless throughout the long dry season, and the streams become dry or 
merely form chains of brackish pools.! The convolvuli and other vines 
clinging to the arboreal vegetation, though dead at this season, indicated 
the presence of a wealth of flowers and foliage during the short rainy period. 

Our train comprised several score of pack mules and a considerable num- 
ber of riding horses. Eight animals were necessary for the transportation 
of my collections. The journey occupied several weeks of rather tedious 
travel, Bahia not being reached till about the end of November. I soon 
found storage in a warehouse for my collections until I could arrange for 
their shipment to Boston. They included several cases of bird and mammal 
skins, mollusks, and geological specimens, besides some six or eight barrels 
of fishes, reptiles and other vertebrates in alcohol. These required repack- 
ing for shipment, new casks being necessary for part of the alcoholics. 
Some days later, I found that my fine work in repacking was only temporary, 
for at the custom house an export duty of 83 per cent was levied on natural 
history specimens, which involved the opening of my cases for inspection! 

As I knew Professor Agassiz had an agent, who was also a warm personal 


1] found the water at midday in some of the trickling streams we crossed had a temperature of 
102°°R.. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 7 


friend of his, at Bahia, I had anticipated little trouble in arranging for my 
passage home and the forwarding of my collections. It unfortunately 
happened that he was absent at this time from the country, and also that 
no provision had been made for the arrival of any of the field parties at this 
point, and consequently that no arrangements had been made for sending 
home any members of the Expedition or their collections from Bahia. I 
was thus received as a stranger, and as my funds had become exhausted, 
and I was also seriously ill, the outlook was not exhilarating. It was, 
however, my great good fortune to find at my hotel Captain Joseph Swift, 
of Gloucester, Mass., a retired shipmaster now acting as a super-cargo for 
a Boston firm engaged in the Brazil trade. I revealed to him my straits 
and he immediately took me under his care, even advancing money for my 
expenses. He also secured passage for me on his vessel soon to sail for 
Boston. I shipped the collections by the steamship ‘North America’ of 
the United States and Brazilian Steamship Company. 

On December 15 I left Bahia on the Hanoverian brigantine ‘Gehardina,’ 
of 300 tons, chartered here for Boston and loaded with sugar and hides by 
Captain Swift, who with myself were the only passengers, payment for my 
passage to be made on my arrival in Boston. The accommodations were 
primitive — a berth in the Captain’s cabin under the companion-way, the 
fare conforming in character to what would be expected in a small sailing 
vessel in the commercial trade. The officers and crew were Germans, but 
some of the former could speak a little English. During the three weeks 
spent in Bahia I made the acquaintance of a number of foreigners resident 
in the city, among them several who were much interested in scientific 
pursuits, notably Dr. O. Wucherer and Charles Williams. 

The ‘Gerhadina’ was favored for a month with fine weather and made a 
quick voyage as far as Cape Hatteras, with a fair prospect of reaching 
Boston in less than forty-five days from Bahia. But January 21, in passing 
the Cape, we were suddenly struck by a furious gale, which rapidly drove 
us off our course to the eastward. We were constantly under close-reefed 
sails for fourteen days, the wind shifting about every twelve hours from 
northwest to northeast, and back again, with tremendously heavy cross 
seas. At the end of this period the ship had become strained and was 
leaking, the food supply was getting short, and as a last resource Captain 
Swift and Captain Aalderks decided to try to make Bermuda, then not far 
away. But as we had not seen the sun for two weeks, it was dangerous to 
trust to dead reckoning in attempting to make so difficult a port in stormy 
weather. So the ‘Gerhadina’ was soon headed southward for St. Thomas, 
the harbor of last resort for North Atlantic seamen in distress. In a short 
time we passed into smoother water and in due time reached the harbor 


18 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


of St. Thomas, which we found filled with shipping driven thither, like 
ourselves, by stress of weather, most of the vessels with broken masts or 
otherwise seriously disabled. Not a few, as we learned later, caught in 
this memorable storm were never again heard from, and our ship was among 
those reported as overdue and supposed to have been lost. 

A week at St. Thomas sufficed for repairs and the taking on of fresh 
supplies, and gave me time to gather a small general collection of natural 
history specimens, and we were again on our way north, with fine weather 
and full sails as far as the dreaded Cape, when we again encountered heavy 
gales and were driven from our course. It was overcast and stormy with 
high winds for the rest of the voyage; we hoped we still held enough westing 
to make our port, but were in doubt, as we were again dependent on dead 
reckoning. It was therefore a crucial time when at sunset of a boisterous 
March day the sailors were sent aloft to shorten sail, preparatory to laying- 
to for the night, presumably near the eastern end of Long Island, but with 
doubt as to whether we should not be so far off our course as to render 
necessary another long voyage to recover our lost westing. Shortly, how- 
ever, the sailors from the topmast announced a light, and soon after a 
second light, thus making us sure of the position of the ship and the course 
to lay. The next morning the ‘Gerhadina’ was anchored in the harbor of 
Woods Hole, and a few days later ended her ninety days’ voyage from Bahia 
to Boston. 

When I left Bahia I was rather glad that the fates had determined that 
I was to make the voyage home in a sailing vessel, and on completing it I 
was still glad I had had the opportunity of such a varied experience. I had 
seen the ocean for weeks in its most amiable moods, and I had seen it again 
for weeks in its most angry paroxysms. The trade-wind belts, the doldrums 
with their huge, slowly rolling swells, the North Atlantic in its February 
anger, were all precious memories. The Sargosso Sea had added specimens 
of the surface life of the sea to my collections — minute mollusks and a varied 
assortment of crustaceans gathered from the gulf weed — and many observa- 
tions on sea-birds, flying-fishes, and the atmospheric phenomena of mid- 
ocean. 


Collecting Trip to the Middle West (1867). 


During the last two months of the voyage my health naturally improved, 
but I had suffered so long from chronic indigestion and intestinal troubles, 
and especially during my journey in Brazil, that I finally felt it best to try 
and abandon my ideal of a life devoted to natural history research, and 
accordingly resigned my position at the Museum of Comparative Zodélogy 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 19 


and returned to the farm. WVith this change of occupation my health 
improved, and with it my old love strengthened. During the winter of 
1866-1867, the point of non-resistance was reached, and I planned a natural 
history collecting trip to the Middle West, in parts of which several of my 
mother’s brothers and sisters had settled as pioneers, thus affording me 
convenient bases from which to prosecute my work. I was successful in 
securing orders in advance for specimens of both animals and plants, and 
so successful in filling the orders that after thousands of miles of travel and 
the acquisition of a most valuable experience I returned home free of debt, 
and therefore perfectly satisfied with the results. This trip furnished 
material for several faunal papers, published in the ‘Proceedings’ and 
‘Memoirs’ of the Boston Society of Natural History. 

The month of May was spent near Sodus Bay, on Lake Ontario. Dur- 
ing June the Chicago Academy of Sciences was the point from which 
excursions were made into the adjoining country, including a trip to Rich- 
mond, Indiana, where as a guest of a fellow naturalist, I passed one of the 
most enjoyable weeks of my life, collecting fossils as well as birds, insects 
and shells. Several weeks were spent in north-central Illinois, and also in 
the vicinity of Des Moines, Iowa. During most of July and August I was 
a guest of the Iowa Geological Survey, through the kindness of the State 
Geologist, Dr. Charles A. White, and of his field assistant, my friend 
Orestes H. St. John, who had been a fellow-student with me at the Cambridge 
Museum and my companion on the Brazil expedition. I accompanied 
him during his reconnaissance of an area about sixty miles square in south- 
west-central Iowa (mainly the nine counties of Dallas, Guthrie, Boone, 
Greene, Carroll, Crawford, Sac, Calhoun and Audubon), the greater part 
of which region, and thence westward to the Missouri River, was still 
practically an unsettled wilderness. Our camp wagon was our sole shelter 
and our immediate source of supply, and our teamster-cook our only human 
associate for many days together. Here I made general collections, but 
for the most part found plants and insects the most profitable, securing 
during the trip several species of each that proved to be new to science. 
On my return I spent a few weeks in southern Michigan, and made another 
short stay at Sodus, N. Y. 

This out of door life pfoved of great benefit to my health, and while 
still in the West I wrote to Professor Agassiz that I felt again equal to 
resuming my duties at the Museum of Comparative Zoédlogy. His response 
was a most cordial invitation to return, and in October I resumed my post, 
where I remained uninterruptedly for the next eighteen years, except when 
in the field on Museum expeditions, as noted in the following narrative. I 
had already been placed in charge of the departments of mammals and birds 


20 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


when I accompanied the Agassiz Expedition to Brazil, in 1865, and in 1871 
was promoted to the official status of “assistant in ornithology,” and con- 
tinued as acting curator of mammals and birds till my resignation in 1885 
to assume similar duties at the American Museum of Natural History in 
New York. 

East Florida Expedition (1868-1869). 


In the winter of 1868-1869 I conducted a three month’s exploration of 
the country bordering the St. John’s River in eastern Florida, between 
Jacksonville and Enterprise, which furnished the basis of my paper ‘On 
the Mammals and Winter Birds of East Florida,’ etc., published in the 
‘Bulletin’ of the Museum of Comparative Zoédlogy (April, 1871). This 
journey was made, with two volunteer assistants, in a ship’s yawl fitted 
with a large sail. As the country was then only slightly settled above 
Pilatka, our boat was our home and base of supplies, but at times we occu- 
pied rude huts that had been deserted by their former occupants. Para- 
keets were still abundant, and alligators had almost undisputed possession 
of the bayous and river banks. At certain points of our journey no human 
beings were seen for many days together except the members of our own 
party. 


ASSISTANT AT MusEuM oF CoMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY (1871-1885). 
Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Expedition (1871-1872). 


In April, 1871, I started on a nine months’ collecting trip to the Great 
Plains and the Rocky Mountains, in the interest of the Museum of Com- 
perative Zodlogy, with two assistants, Richard Bliss, a fellow-student at 
the Agassiz Museum, and Caleb W. Bennett, of Springfield, Massachusetts. 
Mr. Bliss returned to Cambridge about the beginning of August, Mr. 
Bennett remaining with me, as hunter and taxidermist, till the end of the 
expedition in January, 1872. General collections were made at intervals 
from the Missouri River to Great Salt Lake, Utah. As western Kansas 
was then subject to raids by hostile Indians, we were provided with letters 
of introduction from Major-General Pope, Commander of the Department 
of the Missouri, to the commandants of the military posts near our proposed 
route in Kansas and Wyoming, requesting them to aid the expedition by 
providing escorts and transportation, should such assistance prove neces- 
sary. Accordingly Fort Hays was selected as the most convenient base 
from which to hunt buffalo, where a vacant suite of unoccupied officer’s 
quarters was assigned us for use during the six weeks we spent at this point, 
making collections of the most varied and comprehensive character. 

We began work at Leavenworth, where we spent the first ten days of 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. Ye 


May, and then went to Topeka, remaining there about two weeks collecting, 
chiefly birds, fishes, reptiles, and insects. We arrived at Fort Hays May 
26, where we remained till July 3, becoming well acquainted with the sur- 
rounding country while waiting for the military escort we were assured 
was necessary for our safety in going out to the buffalo range, some thirty 
miles northwest of the post. The cavalry, however, was absent on escort 
duty with government supply trains and the date of their return was 
tantalizingly indefinite. While waiting for several weeks for this alleged 
essential to our buffalo work, we made the acquaintance of Charles Clark- 
son, a professional buffalo hunter who for several years had hunted buffalo 
in winter for shipment to the eastern cities. This intelligent, enterprising 
and level-headed New Englander, who lived in a dugout on the outskirts 
of the military reservation, who owned a good pair of mules and a wagon, 
and was familiar with the ways of the Sioux Indians, assured us it would be 
quite safe to go on a buffalo hunt without the encumbrance of a military | 
escort. As he was willing to act as our scout and hunter and furnish us 
with the necessary transportation for a reasonable consideration, we deemed 
it safe to trust to his judgment regarding the risks entailed. : 

We left Fort Hays on our buffalo hunt June 21, returning four days 
later with a wagon load of buffalo skeletons and skulls, besides leaving on 
the open prairie five skeletons we had prepared that we were unable to 
bring with us for lack of room. As we still needed an old cow, and had 
secured no calves, Clarkson and I returned to the buffalo range the next 
day, and at the end of another four days had completed our desiderata, 
having not only secured a fine old cow skeleton and a number of young 
calves, but had also retrieved the skeletons left on our former trip, which, 
however, we found had been somewhat damaged by coyotes. In all our 
‘spoils numbered 14 complete skeletons and several additional skulls, repre- 
senting both sexes and various ages, from yearlings to old bulls and cows; 
also the skins as well as skeletons of five young calves. The time thus 
occupied was eight days, involving about thirty-six hours of travel. We 
saved no skins, except those of the calves, as at this season the old coat had 
been shed (except of course on the shoulders and head) and the new coat 
was so short that it barely concealed the skin. 

The experience was one long to be remembered, as we took no camp out- 
- fit but our blankets, a little flour and canned fruits, depending naturally 
upon buffalo meat for our main subsistence, buffalo chips supplying us with 
fuel. Our blankets were our only shelter at night, and our wagon was the 
only available screen from the hot midday sun, under the shade of which we 
crept to eat our dinner.' We saw no Indians, but the landscape was every- 


1 Temperature 105° F. in the shade on one occasion, and usually over 100° at midday. 


29 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


where dotted with small bands of buffalos; which were so numerous on one 
occasion that they darkened the plains to the west of us as far as the eye 
could reach. They were given no peace by the skin hunters, several parties 
of whom we met on the range. The skins then sold for two dollars each at 
the nearest railroad station. Once a small band of buffalo, stampeded by 
these hunters, sent us to our wagon for safety, the herd passing on both 
sides of us almost within arm’s reach. 

On returning from the buffalo hunt we packed the collections we had 
accumulated at Fort Hays and shipped them East, part to Rochester for 
preparation and part direct to the museum at Cambridge. July 3 we took 
the train for Denver, and at daylight the next morning obtained our first 
view of the Rocky Mountains, the snowfields on the higher peaks coming 
clearly into view with the rising of the sun. We spent two days at Denver, 
outfitting for a wagon trip into the mountains, and left for South Park 
on the afternoon of July 6, camping the first night on Turkey Creek, just 
behind the first range of foothills. While in Denver we had noticed a band 
of about 300 Ute Indians, encamped on the outskirts of the city, who had 
come in to receive their annual supplies from the United States Government, 
and to barter their robes and other furs with the people of Denver. They 
swarmed through the town on horseback, men, women and children, clad 
in their native costumes, their faces painted, and their persons decorated 
with beads and brass and tin trinkets. They were nearly all bare-headed, 
their coarse jet black hair reaching usually to their shoulders. Some wore 
hats, or hats and coats, and a few full suits of white man’s clothes, but 
usually a deer skin or a woolen blanket wrapped about them was the princi- 
pal article of clothing. It was our first sight of the red man in his native 
splendor and naturally these Indians greatly interested us. But great was 
our disgust to find that they had left Denver for the mountains just ahead 
of us and were encamped only a few hundred yards beyond the place we 
had chosen for our own camp. While they might be ‘honest Indians’ our 
guide deemed it best for us to keep a sharp lookout for our horses and other 
belongings. We decided to stay in camp in the morning till they passed on. 
They broke camp early and we did not anticipate meeting them again. 
In this we were disappointed, for we found they had gone only a few miles 
and again encamped. ‘Thus we passed and repassed each other’s camps for 
several days, until we decided to remain for some time at a point that 
offered good collecting, in the hope that they would continue on their 
journey and we should be rid of their visits. But this plan failed, as we 
again overtook them and they later became once more a nuisance. They 
were friendly, indeed quite too familiar, and inveterate beggars, particu- 
larly for tobacco and matches. 


bo 
Ww 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Our journey to South Park was of great interest, not only for its scenic 
features but for the transitions in the fauna and flora as we advanced to 
higher altitudes. We reached the base of Mount Lincoln, at the northern 
end of the Park, July 19, where we camped for a week, extending our collect- 
ing trip to above timber line. On the top of Mount Lincoln we found the 
pipit (Anthus rubescens) breeding, and collected specimens of a new species 
of rosy finch (Leucosticte australis), and at timber line, in the taluses ob- 
tained about thirty specimens of a new pica (Ochotona saxatilis Bangs, 
described in 1899 from the specimens we collected in 1871). We returned 
from South Park by way of Pike’s Peak, Manitou Springs and the Garden 
of the Gods.1. We remained here nearly a week collecting and thence pro- 
ceeded along the outer base of the foothills northward to Denver, where 
we arrived August 18, the trip having occupied a little more than six weeks. 

Our next collecting point was Cheyenne, where we spent ten days, and 
then Bennett and I (Mr. Bliss having returned to Cambridge) went direct 
to Ogden, Utah. This was our base for the next seven weeks, from which 
we made excursions to the northern end of Great Salt Lake. Here we found 
avocets, stilts, phalaropes and other marsh and shore birds plentiful, and 
an abundance of ducks, terns and gulls. We also obtained many fishes, 
mollusks and crayfishes. 

October 9 we took the train east to Green River, where we remained 
till the 17th. Here we also secured many fishes from pools and streams, 
and made a considerable collection of fossil fishes from the famous Green 
River shales, but high winds, ice and snow rendered collecting difficult. 

From Green River we went to Fort Fred Steele, arriving at 3 A. M., 
October 18. This was the point we had selected from which to make our 
departure into the mountains for big game. We soon found, however, that 
this plan was impracticable, owing to the expense and the uncertainty of 
the results. Fortunately at this juncture I met Messrs. Ferris and Hunt, 
professional hunters, who were supplying game to the eastern markets as a 
business. I soon made an agreement with them to furnish a specified 
number of the various kinds of such big game as could be obtained in this 
region, for a certain price per head, to be delivered to us at Percy, a station 
on the Union Pacific Railroad about thirty miles east of Fort Steele. | 

After packing and shipping the collections made at Fort Steele, which 
included among other things several boxes of fossils, we went to Percy, 
where we remained from October 20 till December 18. Percy consisted 
at this time of the railway station, a small hotel, and one or two occupied 
log-cabins and many vacant ones,— all that was left of what a few years 


1 There were only a few log-cabins and a post-office at the present site of Colorado Springs, and 
Manitou was merely a name. 


24 ’ AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


before, while the Union Pacific Railroad was under construction at this 
point, was a booming railroad town. Some of the houses were in decay 
and others had been removed, but the evidences of its former activities 
were shown by those remaining and the characteristic debris of tin-cans, 
empty bottles and other refuse. We hired for our workshop a log cabin 
that had previously seen service as a saloon, as it was large and fairly well 
lighted. It served our purpose admirably. Here for two months we 
worked six days a week in preparing the big game delivered to us at fre- 
quent intervals by Ferris and Hunt, as per contract. About one day in 
seven we devoted to hunting, and added thus to our spoils several ante- 
lopes and coyotes, jack-rabbits and cottontails, besides many birds, inelud- 
ing a large series of sage grouse, then so abundant that Bennett and I, on 
one occasion, shot thirty in an hour — all we could carry to camp, and 
could have killed as many more the next hour had we needed them. As 
no hay or similar material could be obtained at Percy, we had to substi- 
tute dry grass for filling the skins of the mammals, and to obtain this we 
had to tramp to a moist ravine a mile and a half away, cut it with our 
hunting knives and carry it home on our backs. A journey of a hun- 
dred miles by rail to Laramie was necessary to obtain material for pack- 
ing cases, namely, discarded dry-goods boxes, which we dismantled and 
shipped as freight to Percy and remade to suit our needs. Roughing out 
skeletons and preparing skins of deer, elk, mountain sheep and antelope 
occupied our time and kept us confined to our laboratory for the greater 
part of these eight weeks, but our enthusiasm was well sustained by the 
results, and now and then a day’s pe through the sage brush and snow 
relieved the monotony. 

Our shipment of 17 large cases from Percy included skins and skeletons 
of 8 elk, 12 black-tailed deer, 1 white-tailed deer, 25 prong-horned antelopes, 
and 11 bighorn sheep; also 35 skulls of antelope and a fine series of the skulls 
of elk and black-tailed deer, besides small game (coyotes, foxes, porcupines, 
beaver, rabbits, ete.) and birds. It nearly filled a freight car, and was 
shipped on December 17, but, as will be explained later, did not reach its 
destination for several months. 

On the 19th we took an east-bound train for Omaha, already twelve 
hours late when it reached Perey. A mile and a half east of Percy we ran 
into a snowbank and the train was partly derailed and delayed for another 
two hours. Between Carbon and Medicine Bow we were again stalled in 
the snow for twenty-two hours, where we had to await the arrival of a 
wrecking train, and two engines to replace our disabled ones. We got our 
first square meal in two days at Sidney. We struck another heavy snow- 
storm at North Platte, and at Elkhorn, near Omaha, it was necessary to 


iw) 
Or 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


divide the train to overcome the heavy grade. When we reached Omaha 
at 9 a. M. of the 22nd, the train was nearly three days overdue. ‘It was. 
also the last train that made the run over the Union Pacific Railroad that 
winter, owing to a snow-blockade which lasted for several months. 

As I had already made an arrangement by letter with Clarkson of Hays 
City for a winter buffalo hunt, we left Omaha for Kansas City at 4 P. M. 
of the same day, reaching Kansas City at 4 a. M. of the 23rd. Here I ob- 
tained free passes to Ellis and return for Mr. Bennett and myself, and 
transportation for our specimens on the return trip to Kansas City at half 
rates, and thence east to Boston by the Merchant’s Union Express Company 
on the same terms. At 10.45 Pp. M. we were again on a train bound west 
over the Kansas Pacific. At 11 A.M. the next day we were stalled in a snow 
drift near Bunkerhill. At Bunkerhill we found five freight trains, eleven 
engines and a snowplow stalledin the snow. At3 Pp. m. orders were received 
for all trains to remain here till the storm abated. At 8.30 4. mM. the next day 
(December 25) our train, equipped with a snowplow, started on its journey 
(temperature 12° F. below zero), but in an hour we were again stuck fast in 
the snow in a cut, but were finally pushed through by two freight engines 
attached to the rear end of the train. A delay of an hour at Fossil, for 
switching, gave the passengers, at 11 A. M., an opportunity to procure a 
luncheon of crackers and cheese,— our Christmas dinner and the first food 
we had had since the previous evening. 

We reached Hays, thirty miles west of Fossil, that evening. Within 
sight of the station were five stalled trains, each with two locomotives. 
Behind us were two freight trains with ‘double-headers,’ and two snowplows, 
one propelled by three engines and the other by four. During the following 
night the wind refilled the cuts behind us between Walker and Bunkerhill, 
causing another blockade. 

On the 26th I went to Clarkson’s ranch and found he was at Coyote, 
fifty miles further west; but there was no train west till the evening of the 
28th, when we reached Coyote, at 9.30 p.m. Fortunately the weather had 
now moderated, and on the 29th we went to Clarkson’s camp and made 
arrangements with him for another buffalo hunt. At this time we were in 
quest of skins for mounting; our summer hunt, as already stated, was 
primarily for skeletons. Two weeks earlier buffalo had been abundant as 
far east as Coyote, but they had been so relentlessly persecuted by hunters 
that they had moved west and were now massed chiefly between Sheridan 
and Wallace, about one hundred miles to the westward. Between one 
hundred and one hundred and fifty hunters were said to be in constant 
pursuit of them. It was roughly estimated that at least 15,000 buffalo had 
been killed along the Kansas Pacific Railroad during the year (1871). 


26 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


We were prepared to start on our hunt on the morning of December 31, 
but the weather turned severely cold and delayed our departure till the 
following day, January 1, 1872, when we drove south with Clarkson’s outfit 
for nine miles and then returned, finding no buffalo, and being assured by 
hunting parties we met that there were no buffalos in that direction. We 
lunched at Coyote and then drove north nearly to the Saline River, camping 
for the night six miles north of Coyote, and the following night on the South 
Fork of the Solomon, 30 miles from Coyote. The next morning we went 
northwest, along the divide between the Saline and the Solomon, to a point 
opposite Buffalo Station, thence turning north and camping on the North 
Fork of the Solomon. We saw no buffalo, but were informed by returning 
hunters that there was a large herd six or eight miles to the northward, 
where a band of Omaha Indians were hunting them. The next night we 
camped on a tributary of the Solomon, ten miles northeast of Grinnell. 
During the day’s drive we saw a few buffalo about 2 P. M., and were in sight 
of small bands for the rest of the day, but they were too wild to permit of a 
near approach. The next day, January 4, we came up with the first old 
bulls about five miles from camp, but they were wary, and the ground was 
unfavorable for stalking them. ‘The weather became suddenly threatening 
and the wind keen and piercing from the north. Clarkson and his partner, 
Alden, deemed it imprudent to go further from the railroad, as if a storm 
should overtake us we would be far from shelter and without wood. They 
decided to return toward the Saline, from which point we could easily reach 
shelter should a storm render it necessary. We turned southward and in a 
few miles came upon a small herd of buffalo, from which Clarkson killed 
five, Alden three, and I got an old bull. The weather continuing cold and 
the sky overcast, with signs of a storm, we put up our large Sibley tent, 
which protected us from the wind and served as our base for the next three 
days, during which, although buffalo were scarce, our hunters secured their 
loads of meat, and we obtained nearly the desired number of skins. On the 
return journey we secured two more, reaching Buffalo Station on the even- 
ing of the 7th. The station consisted of the section house and two freight 
cars, one of them fitted up with sleeping bunks and the other serving as 
kitchen, and a water tank and two or three dugouts. The owner of one 
of the latter, a buffalo hunter, happened to be absent and Mr. Bennett 
and I slept in his dugout. Although the entrance was ankle deep with 
water, and the floor also covered with water, we passed a comfortable night, 
such shelter as this being far preferable to sleeping out of doors in the 
chilling south wind then prevailing. We learned here that the buffalo had 
left the whole line of the railroad, presumably driven off by the 600 or more 
Omaha Indians we had seen encamped on the Solomon. So we felt satis- 
fied that we had done as well as was possible under the conditions. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 27 


We drove the next day to Coyote, where we finished preparing our 
specimens and boxed and shipped them. They included eight skins and 
three heads of buffalo, and skins and skeletons of two lynxes, several coyotes, 
wolves and jack-rabbits, and a few birds. We settled with Clarkson for $50, 
which sum covered our transportation and board for a week, and his promise 
to get for us three more skins of buffalo — two cows and a yearling bull, 
which were still lacking to complete our series. 

We left Fort Hays for the East at 3 p. M. on January 12, and reached 
Cambridge on the 22d, stopping by the way at my old home in Springfield 
for a couple of days to visit the home folks, well satisfied with the results of 
our nine months’ work in the field. We had collected and sent to Cam- 
bridge 200 skins, 60 skeletons and 240 additional skulls of mammals (mostly 
large species); 1500 bird skins, over 100 birds in alcohol, and a large num- 
ber of nests and eggs; a considerable number of fishes, both fossil and re- 
cent, and a few mollusks, and many insects and crustaceans. 

The following year I remained at the Cambridge Museum, cataloguing 
and labeling the rapidly increasing collections of birds and mammals. 


Yellowstone Expedition (1873). 


In May, 1873, Professor Baird, Assistant Secretary of the Smithsonian 
Institution, saw an opportunity to advance our knowledge of the natural 
history of a then little known portion of the West through utilizing oppor- 
tunities afforded by the large military expedition the War Department was 
to provide as an escort for the railroad surveyors who were to locate the 
Northern Pacific Railroad westward from Bismark. A number of promi- 
nent specialists were invited to codperate in the natural history work, some 
of whom accepted but later found it impracticable to join the expedition. 
I was invited to take charge of the work in vertebrate zodlogy, and the 
authorities of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy kindly granted me 
leave of absence to accompany the expedition, the Museum to have,a share 
of the duplicates obtained. The large scientific staff contemplated at the 
outset dwindled to a few persons, mostly with little or no experience in 
scientific field work, so that I was installed as chief of the party. I secured 
the services of Mr. C. W. Bennett, who accompanied me on my 1871 expedi- 
tion, as my personal assistant. The other members of the party were a 
geologist, a photographer, and an artist, the latter being Mr. Konopicky 
of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy. The photographer’s wagon un- 
fortunately did not arrive until the expedition had reached the Yellowstone, 
and he was accordingly greatly handicapped in his work. 


28 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Mr. Bennett and I left Boston for Bismark, on the Upper Missouri, 
May 27, via New York, Chicago, St. Paul, Duluth and Fargo, the other 
members of our party joing us at New York. Passenger trains were then 
running over the Northern Pacific only as far as Fargo, North Dakota. 
Construction trains were in use beyond this point, running “on orders” at 
irregular and uncertain intervals. On reaching the 17th siding, some 


twelve miles or more east of Bismark, we had orders to wait over till the 


next day for a train, or return to the 16th siding, signifying at least a day’s 


delay. The terrain here was a wet grassy prairie, the home of myriads of 


mosquitoes; the shelter for the night was a box car, without seats, blankets, 
food, or even potable water. It seemed better to complete the journey on 


foot, and with two of my party and a sergeant from Fort Lincoln, with the 


mail for Forts Lincoln, Rice and Buford, as guide, we reached Bismark at 
midnight. The distance from Fargo to. Bismark is 200 miles, which re- 
quired nearly three days to make. 

Reported the next day at Fort Lincoln, opposite Bismark, and made 
arrangements for transportation to Fort Rice, some twenty miles south of 
Fort Lincoln, and the rendezvous of the Yellowstone Expedition, where we 
arrived on the 8th of June. Here our party was most cordially welcomed 
by Gen. D. 58. Stanley, commander of the Expedition, who assured us of 
every assistance possible in our work. Captain H. M. Lazelle, Company H, 
Sth Infantry, U.S. A., an officer greatly interested in several lines of scien- 
tific research, was detailed to take charge of the Scientific Corps, which was 
assigned to the Headquarters Division of the Expedition. In due time we 
were provided with the necessary equipment, comprising two (later five) 
six-mule baggage wagons, five tents, five saddle horses, and a detail of a 
sergeant and three soldiers to look after our comfort and belongings, one 
of them serving as cook. 

The previous year the survey of the Northern Pacific Railroad route was 
seriously impeded in the Yellowstone region by hostile Indians. Hence a 
heavy military escort was this year provided for the protection of the engi- 
neer corps. The present escort comprised 1400 troops and 400 civilian 
employees, accompanied by a train of 800 wagons, each drawn by six mules, 
and 1200 beeves on the foot to furnish fresh beef en route. The escort 
comprised the famous Seventh Cavalry, with Gen. George A. Custer in 
command, and parts of the Eighth and Twenty-second Infantry, and a 
company of Indian scouts. 

The military escort broke camp at Fort Rice on June 20, following the 
engineers who had taken the field some ten days before. Our course was 
nearly due west, and the first objective point was the Great Bend of Heart 
River; a later landmark was the crossing of Big Muddy Creek, where we 


ee 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 29 


were detained several days by heavy rains and high water. The Big 
Muddy was finally crossed on a pontoon bridge, constructed of wagon 
bodies filled with empty water casks. It required the greater part of two 
days to make the crossing after the construction of the bridge. We reached 
the Little Missouri July 11, via the Bad Lands and Davis Creek. The 
descent of the latter was a tedious day’s march of twelve hours, to gain the 
same number of miles on our course. The stream was tortuous and the 
valley narrow, so that it was necessary to build ten corduroy bridges in a 
distance of eight miles. The infantry was deployed in single file in the 
bluffs on each side of the creek, to prevent a surprise attack by Indians. 
The ford of the Little Missouri was over a treacherous bottom, and before 
attempting it with the wagon train it was found necessary to consolidate 
the quicksands by treading with the cavalry and the herd of beeves. It 
‘was also necessary for the pioneers to construct a. roadway up the gorge on 
‘the west side in order to reach the plateau on the western side of the river. 

The Yellowstone River was reached July 15, and the crossing made a 
few days later by means of the steamboat ‘Josephine,’ which met us here 
for the purpose of ferrying the expedition across. We remained in camp 
near this point for two weeks, waiting for the engineers to connect their 
preliminary line with their work of the previous year. A stockade was 
built here and named Camp Thorne, at which a large quantity of supplies 
was left, with a strong guard of troops, including two squadrons of cavalry 
‘and two companies of infantry. The site of Camp Thorne is now the 
town of Glendive. The distance from Fort Rice to Camp Thorne was 310 
miles. 

On July 28 we began our march up the west side of the Yellowstone. 
‘Owing to the bad lands bordering the river our line of travel was some 
‘distance to the westward, and very devious, it being necessary at times to 
make long detours in order to get around deep ravines, a long, hard day’s 
march of ten or twelve hours resulting in some instances in a gain of not 
more than two or three miles on our course. We passed the mouth of 
Powder River July 30, the mouth of Tongue River August 4, the mouth of 
the Rosebud August 7, the mouth of the Big Horn August 12, reaching 
Pompey’s Pillar about 8 a. mM. August 15, 190 miles above Camp Thorne. 
This was the end of our reconnaissance on the Yellowstone, the line above 
Pompey’s Pillar having been surveyed the previous year. On the 17th of 
August we turned west toward the Musselshell River, which we struck at a 
point 50 miles northwest from Pompey’s Pillar on the 19th. This point 
marked the end of the outward journey. 

The next day we crossed to the left bank of the Musselshell and followed 
down this river, to the Big Bend of the Musselshell, which we reached 


30 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


August 27. We then struck across to the Yellowstone along the divide 
between Big Porcupine and Little Porcupine Creeks, reaching the Yellow- 
stone River at the mouth of the Little Porcupine, a little above the mouth 
of Tongue River. Here we struck our outward trail, which we retraced to 
Camp Thorne, where we arrived September 7, and later, over the same trail 
proceeded to Fort Rice, our starting-point. 

The daily routine of the march was usually as follows: Reveille at 
3 A4.M.; breakfast at 3.30; tents struck at 5; marching at 5.30; with 
variations to earlier or later according to special exigencies. The head of 
the column usually made camp at from 12.30 to 3 Pp. M.; when delayed by 
bridging streams or road-making, camping was delayed till 4.30 or later — 
once till 6.40 and once till 7.30, after a day’s march of ten, twelve, or even 
fourteen hours. The daily distance ranged from eight to twenty miles, 
according to the amount of delay incident to bad roads. 

Field observations and collecting were usually restricted to the line of 
march, and the preparation of specimens to the daylight hours in camp. 
The weeks spent in camp at Fort Rice and Camp Thorne, and the delays at 
the crossing of the Big Muddy, the Little Missouri, and at a few other points, 
were utilized to the utmost by Mr. Bennett and myself for the increase of 
our collections. But parts of the journey were less favorable, owing to 
Indian trouble. Indians were first seen watching us from neighboring 
bluffs near the mouth of Powder River; they soon became bolder and were 
seen daily, when orders were given forbidding straying from the line of - 
march, or the use of firearms without permission from the commanding 
officer. This compelled us to abandon bird collecting and side excursions 
for several weeks. The first attack upon the Expedition by the Indians. 
was an attempt by them to ambush the advance guard of cavalry, while 
resting at midday some miles in advance of the main column, about twenty 
miles above Tongue River. Here General Custer, with seventy men, had 
a four hour battle with about 300 Indians on August 3, finally charging 
and dispersing them. But while the battle was in progress a part of the 
hostile band, hovering along the left flank of our main command, suc- 
ceeded in killing several of our stragglers, including the veterinary surgeon, 
the sutler, and a cavalryman. During the fight General Custer had one 
private wounded and several horses killed and others wounded. The 
extent of the casualties of the Indians was not ascertained, but at least 
two were killed and several wounded. Two days later an Indian alarm 
caused General Stanley to halt and park the train, in preparation for an 
attack, but the precaution proved to have been unnecessary. Indians were 
seen, however, in the bluffs on the east bank of the river, and a few shots 
were fired at them from our six-pounders, which effectively dispersed them. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. tl: 


On the 8th General Custer received orders to advance and chastise the 
Indians, whose hastily abandoned camps we had been passing for several 
days, as village after village joined the main band. He set out at 8 Pp. M., 
with 450 cavalrymen and our Indian scouts, and by a forced march over- 
took them about daylight on the moruing of the 11th near Pompey’s Pillar. 
The Indians were on the east bank of the river, but at once proceeded to 
cross and, 500 strong, opened an attack upon him from all sides. The fight- 
ing for a time was very sharp, but finally the cavalry were ordered to charge, 
and the Indians soon scattered in every direction. Custer had three men 
killed, including his orderly, and Lieut. Brayden was severely wounded in 
the thigh. For the next twelve hours our camp presented a decidedly 
warlike aspect, with our battery mounted for action and five companies of 
the 22d Infantry doing picket duty. An attack seemed probable, but our 
foes evidently decided we were too well prepared, and slowly retired. 

These incidents gave proof that our heavy military escort was not a 
needless demonstration. It was only three years later, and about sixty 
miles south of Pompey’s Pillar, on the Little Big Horn, that General Custer 
and his whole command were massacred in a fight with this same band of 
Sioux Indians. 

The opportunities for natural history collecting and field research on 
this expedition were far from ideal, but we did not return empty handed 
nor without well-filled notebooks. Very little of the large area traversed 
had previously been visited by a naturalist, and was still unrepresented by 
specimens in the National Museum. Much valuable information was 
gathered respecting the general character of the country and its biology, a 
portion of which was promptly published.! Besides the birds, their nests 
and eggs, and mammals, small collections of reptiles, fishes, insects and 
plants were made, and also of invertebrate fossils, which were everywhere 
scarce. The badlands were searched at every opportunity for vertebrate 
remains, but always, to our great disappointment, in vain. Mr. Konopicky, 
the artist, made colored drawings from life of the few fishes obtained, and 
many excellent sketches of geological exposures and striking topographic 
features in the bad lands. The photographer also secured many char- 
acteristic views of the country traversed. To me it was an experience of 
great value from the naturalist’s point of view, and one I have never ceased 
to recall with much pleasure for its personal associations and its dash of 
military flavor. 


1 Cf. Notes on the Natural History of portions of Dakota and Montana Territories, being the 
substance of a report to the Secretary of War on the collections made by the North Pacific Railroad 
Expedition of 1873, Gen. D. S. Stanley, Commander. By J. A. Allen, Naturalist of the Expedition. 
Proc. Boston Society of Natural History, Vol. XVII, pp. 33-91, June, 1874. Also separately, repaged. 


(Sw) 
bo 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Special Collaborator, U. S. Geological and Geographical Survey of the Terri- 
tories (1876-1882). 


From 1874 to 1882 I gave much the larger part of my time to original 
research, the results of which appeared in numerous minor papers and in 
several monographs. The first of the latter was ‘The American Bisons, 
Living and Extinct,’ published in 1876, under the joint auspices of the — 
Museum of Comparative Zodlogy and the Geological Survey of Kentucky 
(N. S. Shaler, Geologist-in-Charge). In 1876, with the approval of the 
director of the Agassiz Museum, I divided my time between this institution 
and the United States Geological and Geographical Survey, of which for the 
following six years I was a “special collaborator.” At the end of this period 
the United States Geological Survey was reorganized and the scope of its 
work greatly restricted. Also my health became so seriously impaired 
that I was obliged to suspend almost entirely my research work for a con- 
siderable period (as explained later in this narrative). 

My work for the Geological Survey comprised a number of minor papers 
published in the ‘Bulletin’ of the Survey and monographs of various 
families of North American rodents, in co6peration with the late Dr. Elliott 
Coues, published in 1877 as ‘Monographs of North American Rodentia,’ 
forming volume XI of the ‘Memoirs’ of the Survey. In 1880 was pub- 
lished my ‘History of North American Pinnipeds, a Monograph of the 
Walruses, Sea-Lions, Sea-Bears and Seals of North America,’ as No. 12 
of the ‘Miscellaneous Publications’ of the Survey (8vo, pp. xvi + 785, 
‘60 text figures). This was to have been followed by a volume of the ‘ Me- 
moir’ series on the North American species of the mammalian orders Cete 
and Sirenia. To this undertaking I had devoted about three years of 
intense application, and when overtaken by illness had written a large part 
of the text, and most of the plates had been lithographed. The only parts 
ever published were a portion (about one-third) of the bibliography,' and 
the account (with reduced half-tone copies of the plates) of the Atlantic 
Right Whale,” more than a quarter of a century after it was written. The 
printing of the bibliography was left uncompleted in consequence of the 
inability of the author to revise the proofsheets. 

A serious attack of pleurisy interrupted my work in December, 1881. 


1 Preliminary List of Works and Papers relating to the Mammalian Orders Cete and Sirenia. 
Bull. U. S. Geol..and Geogr. Survey, V1, pp. 399-562, August 30, 1882 (1013 titles, carrying the sub- 
ject from the year 1495 to the end of the year 1840). 

2 The North American Right Whale and its Allies. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, pp. 277— 
329, pll. xix—-xxiv, April 8, 1908. As here published the article is changed only by the addition of new 
matter to bring the subject down to the date of publication. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. Bp 


In March, 1882, my physicians were so dissatisfied with my condition that 
they strongly urged a change of climate, and I was sent to Colorado Springs, 
Colorado. I went with the fullest confidence that the change of scene and 
air would soon completely restore my strength, and accordingly took with 
me a collecting outfit for ornithological field work. My good friend William 
Brewster, of Cambridge, joined me in a few weeks. I did not regain 
strength, however, and found myself quite exhausted by a half mile walk. 

During the six weeks Mr. Brewster remained with me, we made many 
collecting trips, by carriage, to the adjacent cafions, forming a considerable 
collection of bird skins and acquiring much greatly valued information 
regarding the spring migration of birds at Colorado Springs. When he 
returned, two months later, to the East I was in worse condition than when 
I left home, and was compelled to spend the summer at a neighboring 
ranch in the foothills of the Rockies, thoroughly mystified at my lack of 
recuperative power, for the organic trouble that led to my being sent to 
Colorado had quite disappeared. | 

On returning to Cambridge in September I learned that my invalidism 
was due to nervous breakdown. Recovery was exceedingly slow; after a 
few months I regained strength for part time work at the Museum, and for 
a small amount of literary work, slowly increasing it, month by month, but 
for years afterward my physical condition was a serious handicap. 

Early in 1885, the financial resources of the Cambridge Museum be- 
came much reduced, leading to the discharge of several of the assistants 
and the prospective dismissal of others, including myself. Through the 
kindness of Mr. Alexander Agassiz, three alternatives were open to me — 
to remain at the Museum at the risk of its being soon closed; to accept a 
position open to me on the United States Geological Survey; or to accept 
a curatorship offered me by .the American Museum of Natural History 
in New York. For family reasons (I had a motherless three-year-old boy 
whom it was necessary to leave with friends in Massachusetts), field work 
with the Geological Survey did not appeal to me, and led to my accept- 
ance of the New York curatorship, which I have ever since felt was a wise 
decision. 


CurRATOR AT AMERICAN Museum oF Natura History (SINCE 1885). 


On May 1, 1885, I entered upon my duties as curator of the ‘ Depart- 
ment of Ornithology and Mammalogy’ at the American Museum of Natural 
History in New York. The collection of mammals then consisted of about 
1000 mounted skins and 300 mounted skeletons, all on exhibition in the 


34 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


exhibition halls. There was not even.a nucleus of a study collection. The 
collection of birds numbered about 10,000 mounted skins and several 
hundred mounted skeletons, all on exhibition, and about 3000 unmounted 
skins, forming the beginning of a study collection. 

The exhibition collections were rich and varied, the specimens having 
been selected with excellent discrimination, mainly by the late Dr. D. G. 
Elliot, and included the famous Maximilian collection of mammals and 
birds. The exhibition collections of this department thus compared 
favorably with the best in this country. The North American collection 
of birds was essentially complete, nearly every procurable species being 
represented, and the specimens were all correctly determined and neatly 
labeled.!. But no part of either collection had been catalogued, except the 
European birds, which had recently been carefully registered by Dr. Edgar 
A. Mearns. In the case of the exotic species, of both mammals and birds, 
the labels bore the names under which they were originally purchased, and 
hence, while in most cases correctly identified, the technical nomenclature 
was antiquated. 

The first task was therefore to catalogue the collections, thus securing a 
permanent record of their history.2 Fortunately, the original labels had 
in most cases been preserved by pasting or tacking them to the bottom of 
the stands. The next step was to renew the labels, in a uniform style, 
giving the currently accepted technical names of the specimens, with their 
localities, In conspicuous type. 

At the end of the first year the mammals had been catalogued and 
relabeled. At the end of the third year most of the birds had been cata- 
logued and provided in large part with new labels. 

In the curator’s first annual report,® on the condition and extent of the 
collections, the importance of fine exhibition collections was not only fully 
recognized, but the formation of adequate study collections, to serve as the 
basis for scientific research, was strenuously insisted upon in order to bring 
the department to a proper standard of efficiency. As often as oppor- 
tunity arose for securing such material, urgent appeals were made to the 


1 The determination was made by Robert Ridgway of the U. S. National Museum shortly before 
the collection came under my care. 

2**The museum assistant in charge of a special department must naturally, if the purpose for 
which large collections are brought together is carried out, spend the greater part of his time in pre- 
paring them for the specialist who is at some future time to avail himself of the treasures brought 
together for his benefit. There is, therefore, the same danger that an eminent specialist, after his 
appointment to the curatorship of a great museum, will find his museum duties so arduous as to prevent 
him, as his colleague in the professional chair has been prevented, by official work, from doing original 
work.’’— A. Agassiz, in the Ann. Report of the Curator of the Museum of Comparative Zoélogy at 
Harvard College for 1883-84, p. 7. 

3 Annual Report of the Trustees for the year 1885 (1886), pp. 9-12. 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. B15) 


President for their purchase,— for the first two years usually without avail, 
owing to the lack of funds.1 

The year 1887, however, proved to be epochal in the history of the 
department, not only through the addition of scientific material but in 
other lines of development. It was in this year that the Trustees pur- 
chased the George N. Lawrence collection of birds, a strictly research 
collection of immense historic importance, numbering some 12,000 speci- 
mens of (mainly) tropical American birds; and also the Herbert H. Smith 
collection of 4000 birds from southern Brazil. The D. G. Elliot collection 
of 2000 humming birds (including many types) was presented by Mr. 
Elliot, and a collection of about 2250 Arizona birds was presented by Dr. 
Edgar A. Mearns, U.S. A. Further accession, comprising some 500 North 
American birds, were also added, partly by purchase and partly through 
the Elliot-Richardson Expedition to Montana (noteworthy as the first 
Museum expedition from this department), making the grand total of 
21,000 birds added in this notable year, besides a large number of nests 
and eggs and some osteological material. The previous year a taxidermist, 
Mr. Jenness Richardson, had been added to the personnel of the depart- 
ment, through which means 18 bird groups were added to the exhibition 
collection, these forming the beginning of the Museum’s magnificent series 
of ‘Habitat Groups.’ 

During this year the efficiency of the department was further greatly 
enhanced by the purchase of the D. G. Elliot ornithological library, con- 
sisting of about 1000 carefully selected volumes, thus providing the Mu- 
seum with an ornithological library surpassed by few similar libraries in 
this country. <A large number of moth-proof tin cans were also provided 
for the safe storage of the rapidly increasing research collections. 

The reception and care of these large accessions naturally checked 
progress in cataloging and labeling the exhibition collections, but the bird 
collection as a whole had suddenly been transformed from merely a show 
collection to one of impressive scientific importance. 

Thus far the curator had had to depend upon his own efforts in catalog- 
ing, labeling, and caring for the collections, except for a little aid now and 
then from interested volunteer assistants; but in 1888, Mr. Frank M. Chap- 


1 From the Treasurer’s Report for the year 1885, it appears that the contribution by the City 
toward maintenance was $15,000, and that the income from invested funds was $300. The rest of the 
$30,509 expended for running expenses was met by personal contributions of the Trustees. The addi- 
tional $6,054 expended for collections and for books for the library came also from private sources. 

It is of interest to compare, in this connection, the income and expenditures in 1915 with those of 
1885, as indicative of the growth of the Museum in resources during the thirty-year interval. The 
financial statement for 1915, as given in the Forty-seventh Annual Report of the Trustees, shows the 
contribution from the City to have been $200,000, leaving a deficit of $38,500 to be met by personal 
contributions of the Trustees. The net receipts from endowment are given as $265,275.16. 


36 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


man was secured as a permanent assistant, to whom twenty years later 
(in 1907) was assigned the curatorship of ornithology. He proved from the 
first an enthusiastic and efficient helper, at all times in fullest sympathy 
with the policies and work of the department. His various expeditions to 
Florida, Trinidad, Cuba, and Mexico in the earlier years of his connection 
with the Museum added important accessions to the research collections 
of mammals and birds, and later he took in hand the construction of the 
Habitat Groups of birds, which soon became an impressive feature of the 
Museum exhibits. This has been followed in recent years by his well 
known series of expeditions to South America, in the interests of this de- 
partment. 

In 1887, on the death of Dr. J. B. Holder, who for many years had been 
curator of the Department of Invertebrate Zodlogy, Fishes and Reptiles, 
this department was also placed in my charge,! and the collections of fishes 
and reptiles remained in my care till 1901. 

Following the bounteous year 1887, were a number of lean years, as 
regards accessions to the collections; there was, however, a slow but steady 
increase of material from both North and South America, and in later 
years also important additions from Asia and Africa. These accessions 
afforded not only material for exhibition but for scientific research, the 
results of which were published in the Museum ‘Bulletin.’ With the 
gradual increase of the collections the scientific staff of the Department also 
increased, from a single assistant in 1888 to six assistants in 1915, besides 
stenographic and other non-staff office assistants and four field assistants. 

As previously noted, Assistant Curator Chapman was placed in charge 
of the ornithological division of the department in 1907, with W. DeW. 
Miller as assistant; Roy C. Andrews became assistant in the mammalogical 
division in 1908, and assistant curator in 1911; H. E. Anthony, became 


1 In the list of Officers and Committees in the Annual Report for 1888, the entry for my department 
reads: ‘‘Prof. J. A. Allen, Curator of the Department of Ornithology, Mammalogy, Fishes and Reptiles. 
Also temporarily in charge of the Department of Invertebrate Zodlogy.”’ In 1890 the Department of 
Invertebrate Zodlogy was transferred to the Department of Geology, Mineralogy and Conchology 
(Prof. R. P. Whitfield, curator), and the name of my department changed to ‘‘Department of Mam- 
malogy, Ornithology, Herpetology, and Ichthyology.” In 1898 it was renamed ‘‘ Department of 
Vertebrate Zoélogy,”’ and this was its official designation till 1901, when Fishes and Reptiles were 
assigned elsewhere and it became *‘ Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology,”’ the designation it 
has since retained. 

There having been, during these years, no available exhibition space for the fishes and reptiles, 
I was responsible merely for their safe storage. I catalogued, however, the accessions of reptiles and 
batrachians, in which classes I had formerly taken much interest, and of which for a time I was curator 
at the Boston Society of Natural History. 

A department of taxidermy was established, as stated above, early in 1886, and, with a chief 
taxidermist and a staff of several assistants, remained an adjunct of the Department of Mammals and 
Birds till 1903, when it was separated as a distinct department and broadened to cover a much wider 


field than mammals and birds. 


ew) 
~ 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


assistant in the same division in 1914. In 1915 Herbert Lang and James 
P. Chapin, on their return from the American Museum Congo Expedition, 
were made, respectively, assistants in mammalogy and ornithology. 

Thus the curator was gradually relieved of much routine work and able 
to devote his time mainly to research and to the editorial supervision of the 
Museum ‘Bulletin’ and the zoélogical portion of the ‘Memoirs.’ 

While these pages are not intended to comprise a detailed history of the 
department, it seems desirable to mention here some of the larger incre- 
ments of the collection, on account of their bearing upon my later scientific 
work. One of the primary duties of a curator and his scientific staff is the 
identification of accessions and the prompt publication of the results of 
their elaboration, in the interest not only of science but of the institution 
with which they are connected. This obligation gives direction to their 
scientific activities, forcing them from general to more special lines. In this 
way their researches are in a measure restricted within certain boundaries. 

As already noted, in 1885 there was not even the beginning of a research 
collection in mammalogy; in 1915 the unmounted mammals exceeded 
40,000 specimens, and included a fair amount of osteological material and 
spirit specimens in addition to skins and skulls; while the old mounted 
specimens had been supplemented, and to a large extent superseded, by 
elaborate group exhibits, illustrating the life histories of many prominent 
types of North American and exotic mammals. During recent years this 
work and the installation of a synoptic mammal collection has been under 
the direct supervision of Director Lucas and Assistant Curator Andrews. 

The bird collection in 1885 included a small number of skins, mostly 
North American, in addition to the 10,000 mounted specimens on exhibition; 
in 1915 it comprised not only the most extensive and elaborate series of 
‘Habitat Groups’ in any museum in the world, but more than 130,000 
study skins. Further available as research material was the collection of 
Dr. Jonathan Dwight, of chiefly North American birds, numbering 45,000 
specimens; Dr. L. C. Sanford’s collection of North American water birds, 
numbering about 8000 specimens; and the Brewster-Sanford collection 
of about 6000 specimens, mostly seabirds in large series from the South 
Atlantic and South Pacific oceans and the southern coasts of South America. 
Thus the American Museum in 1915 contained a total of about 190,000 
birds available for scientific research, exclusive of mounted birds and groups. 
Collectively they doubtless formed the largest and by far the most valuable 
collection of American birds yet assembled in any single museum. 

The first notable accessions of birds were received, as already related, 
in 1887, and comprised two important authoritative and historic collections, 
the Lawrence collection of American birds (largely from tropical America 


38 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


and containing nearly all of Lawrence’s types), and the Elliot collection of 
Hummingbirds, at that time one of the largest and most authoritative 
collections in the world of this numerous and most interesting suborder of 
birds. In the same year were also received a notable collection of birds 
from Arizona for the North American study series, and our first freshly 
collected and wholly unworked collection of exotic birds, the Herbert 
Smith collection of some 4000 specimens from the Province of Matto Grosso, 
Brazil. This became the basis of a series of papers by the curator published 
in the Museum ‘ Bulletin’ in 1889-1892. In 1889 small collections of birds 
were received from Ecuador and Bolivia, aggregating about 600 specimens 
(200 species), which formed also the basis of papers in the ‘ Bulletin.’ 

During the years 1890, 1891, 1892, important,accessions of mammals 
and birds were received through purchases of small collections from Mexico 
and Central America, and collections obtained through Museum expedi- 
tions to Florida, Texas, Colorado, and Washington, upon which reports 
were published in the ‘Bulletin,’ by the curator and the assistant curator. 
In 18938, and again in 1894, Mr. Chapman made collecting trips to the 
Island of Trinidad, B. W. I., resulting in the addition of 550 mammals and 
about 690 birds, which formed the basis of extended papers on the mammal 
and bird faunas of the island. 

Among later collections may be mentioned the Streator collection of 
birds and mammals made in British Columbia in 1899; collections of birds 
and mammals made in Alaska and northern British Columbia by the A. J. 
Stone expeditions in 1897-1903; the H. H. Smith collections of birds and 
mammals from the Santa Marta region of Colombia, received in 1898-1901; 
the Peary collections of birds and mammals from Greenland and Ellsmere 
Land (1898-1909); the collections of Siberian birds and mammals made by 
N. G. Buxton on the Jesup North Pacific Expedition in 1901; the Batty 
collections of birds and mammals from Chiriqui and Mexico received in 
1901-1906; the Nicaragua collections of birds and mammals made by W. 
B. Richardson in 1907-1908; the E. T. Seton collection of mammals from 
the Athabasca-Mackenzie region of Canada, 1908; the Tjader East African 
collection of mammals, 1907; the Rainsford collection of East African 
mammals in 1913; the Congo collections of birds and mammals, each 
numbering some 6000 specimens, made by Herbert Lang and James P. 
Chapin, received in 1915; and the constant inflow of birds and mammals 
from South America, from 1911 to date, through expeditions directed by 
Curator Chapman and collected mainly by Leo E. Miller, W. B. Richard- 
son, and George K. Cherrie; and the birds and mammals collected by 
Cherrie and Miller on the Roosevelt Brazilian Expedition; also birds and 
mammals collected by H. E. Anthony in Panama, and in Oregon and 
Washington. : 

The Asiatic material received, in addition to the Buxton Siberian col- 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 39 


lection already mentioned, has been mainly collections of mammals from 
the Island of Hainan, China, received by purchase, 1906-1908, and a few 
small lots of mammals received from western and northern China ‘(by 
purchase); and small collections of birds and mammals collected in the 
Dutch East Indies by Roy C. Andrews in 1909 and in Korea in 1912. 
Especially should also be mentioned the important collection of cetacean 
material collected by Mr. Andrews in the North Pacific in 1910-1912. 

This material has all been carefully studied and reported upon in the 
‘Bulletin’ and ‘Memoirs’ of the American Museum, except the recently 
received mammals and birds of the Congo Expedition, and some of the 
South American collections of birds, the Cetacean material having been the 
basis of monographs by Mr. Andrews, while Mr. Anthony has published 
on the mammals collected by him in Panama and Oregon. The other 
mammal collection have all been reported upon in numerous papers by the 
writer, including a memoir on Muskoxen, recent and extinct (1913), and a 
revision of the South American Sciuridee (1915). My last faunal papers on 
birds were reports on the Smith collection from Santa Marta, Colombia 
(1900-1904) and the Buxton collection from Siberia (1905). Two papers 
on the types of the North American genera of birds (1907) are also among 
my later papers on birds. 

The collections of birds received prior to 1905 have been the basis of 
several faunal papers by Curator Chapman and Assistant Curator W. DeW. 
Miller. Chapman has published important preliminary papers on the 
recently recerved South American collections of birds, describing many new 
forms, and has now in press a report on the birds of Colombia, which forms 
Volume XXXVI of the American Museum ‘ Bulletin.’ It is thus a pleasure 
to record that the recent field activities of my department of the Museum, 
so extensive and so varied, have been adequately supplemented by labora- 
tory research and prompt publication of results. 


AFFILIATIONS WITH THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS’ UNION AND OTHER 
SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES (SINCE 1883). 


As regards general activities, my interests have been confined within 
narrow limits, partly from an inborn shrinking from functions that necessi- 
tate appearance in public positions and partly through lack of the physical 
endurance to meet such demands. The exception has been my connection 
with the American Ornithologists’ Union, the founding of which was due 
in part to my instigation,’ and with whose activities I became from the first 


1 The call for the meeting of ornithologists which led to its organization was issued by Elliott 
Coues, William Brewster and the writer, in 1883. 


40 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


intimately associated. Although unable to attend the meeting of ornitholo- 
gists at which the Union was founded it happened that I was selected as its 
first president, and, contrary to my expressed wish, was annually reélected 
for the following six years. ‘This embraced of course the formative period 
of the society’s history, when its work was planned and carried forward with 
the energy and enthusiasm that so strongly marked its early activities. 
Committees were appointed at its first meeting to take in hand various 
important subjects, as the migration and geographic distribution of North 
American birds, which investigation was prosecuted so successfully that 
in a few years it outgrew the financial resources of the society and led to the 
establishing of a Division of the United States Department of Agriculture to 
carry on the work, which ultimately became the present Bureau of Biological 
Survey, for many years under the direction of C. Hart Merriam, the chair- 
man of this committee of the American Ornithologists’ Union. 

Another important committee was at the same time established to 
prepare a standard Check-List of North American birds, to displace the 
discordant check-lists then in vogue, with of course undesirable results. 
To accomplish this it was found necessary at the outset to have as the basis 
of the list a consistent and carefully prepared code of rules of nomenclature 
in place of then existing inharmonious codes and go-as-you-please methods 
of nomenclature. This led to intense research on the part of several mem- 
bers of the committee, and eventually to the adoption and publication of a 
new code, departing widely in some important respects from any of its 
predecessors. This A. O. U. Code later became the basis of the International 
Code of Zoélogical Nomenclature, framed on essentially the same lines and 
departing from it in no essential respect, except in point of brevity, through 
omission of adequate illustrations of the rules, and thereby rendering | 
necessary the issuance of official ‘Opinions’ to clear up obscure points. A 
draft of the A. O. U. Code was made by two members of its Nomenclature 
Committee, to serve as a working basis for the Committee, which after 
long and careful consideration by the full Committee was adopted essen- 
tially as written, not only as to form and phraseology but also (with the 
exception of the addition of a single provision, since abandoned) as to its 
rulings.1 

The work of the A. O. U. Nomenclature Committee resulted not only 
in a new check-list of North American birds, standardizing their nomen- 
clature, but also a new and elaborate Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 


11t may be pardonable in this connection to state that the preliminary draft was written in part 
by Elliott Coues (mainly the part comprising the ‘General Principles’) and the rest, including the his- 
torical part of the ‘Introduction’ and most of the ‘Canons’ and their explanatory ‘remarks’, by the 
author of these ‘ Notes.’ 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 41 


which has had vast influence in standardizing the rules of nomenclature 
the world over.! 

Still another important A. O. U. Committee had its inception at the 
first meeting of the Union in 1883, namely, a Committee on the Protection 
of North American Birds, which carried. on the work of bird protection for 
many years with great energy and very important results. From it origi- 
nated later the so-called Audubon Societies movement, from which, through 
the special efforts of one of its enthusiastic members, William Dutcher, 
was developed the present powerful organization known as the National 
Association of Audubon Societies. From this committee also emanated 
the A. O. U. “Model Bird Law,” which has been enacted by most of the 
States in this country and the Provinces of Canada, in the essential phrase- 
ology of the committee’s draft. In this work I shared actively, furnishing 
in 1886 most of the matter for the ‘ Bulletins’ of the committee, issued first 
in ‘Science’ and afterwards separately reprinted in large editions. 

For many years my interest in the activities and welfare of the American 
Ornithologists’ Union was absorbing. For seven years I was its president, 
for twenty-seven years the editor of its journal ‘The Auk’ and its other 
publications; and a member of its Committee on the Classification and 
Nomenclature of North American Birds from 1883 to date. For twenty- 
eight years I maintained an unbroken record of attendance at its annual 
congresses and council meetings. 

Before leaving Cambridge I had begun to take a more or less active 
part in the work of the Boston Society of Natural History, having served 
as acting secretary and editor of its publications for a number of months, 
to fill an interim, and for a number of years had been a member of its Council. 

On my arrival in New York J was warmly welcomed by the New York 
Academy of Sciences, and almost immediately given a place on its Council, 
and later for several years was a Vice-President; but I failed to identify 
myself heartily with its interests, due in part to limitations imposed by 
impaired health. 

My affiliation with the Linnean Society of New York was more intimate, 
and the office of president for a number of years never proved very strenuous, 
as the attendance was usually small and the meetings more or less informal 
and semisocial. 


1 A revised edition of the A. O. U. Code was published in 1910, in which the article adopted by the 
International Congress in 1909, newly defining the method for the determination of types of genera, 
was substituted for the corresponding matter in the original A. O. U. Code. 

The editing and carrying through the press of the three editions of the Check-List and of fifteen 
of its sixteen supplements, and also the original and the revised editions of the Code, was a labor of 
love for the author of these ‘ Notes.’ 

Elliott Coues was chairman of the Nomenclature Committee from its inception in 1883 till his death 
in 1899. He was succeeded by C. Hart Merriam, who held this position till 1904, when he was suc- 
ceeded by the writer, who resigned in 1912. 


49 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND Home Lire (sincE 1874). 


As a fact of possibly some psychological interest I may here briefly revert 
to a handicap with which probably few called to public functions have had, 
at least in equal degree, to contend. From early boyhood I was painfully 
embarrassed in the presence of strangers. Later in life attempts to present 
papers verbally before scientific societies were always unsatisfactory and 
often failures, not from lack of familiarity with the details of the subject . 
but from embarrassment. The same timidity prohibited my seriously 
considering teaching as a possible means of raising funds to aid in meeting 
the expenses of an education, or of giving public lectures for the same pur- 
pose, as many of my associates at the Agassiz Museum were doing, with 
both pleasure and profit. The ordeal of an examination for a degree at the 
Lawrence Scientific School at Harvard was sufficient to banish all aspiration 
for such honors. This in part, perhaps, led to a feeling of disrespect for 
this sort of a label, and to the belief that any worthy accomplishment 
would, sooner or later, receive due recognition. My wants were simple and 
inexpensive; all I aspired to was opportunity for scientific research, believ- 
ing that diligence, singleness of purpose, and honest work would bring its 
own reward. I was content to follow my own lines of dominating interest 
to such limit as the circumstances of earning a living would permit. I never 
had any desire for money as such, nor any interest whatever in financial 
projects, nor any longing for honors beyond those my colleagues in science 
saw fit to impose. Therefore my election, in the course of time, to all of, 
the leading academies of science in this country, and to honorary member- 
ship in foreign societies with which my lines of study were affilated, have 
always come as exceedingly pleasant surprises. The greatest surprise of 
all, however, was the reception of a Ph.D. from Indiana University in 1886, 
the first intimation of which was the receipt from its president, David Starr 
Jordan, of the official notification that I had been thus honored. 

In looking back to the beginning, it is difficult not to contrast my early 
surroundings with those of the average youth of today smitten with the 
nature study ‘craze.’ As stated in the early part of these notes, I was 
wholly isolated from everyone having even the slightest biologic interest, 
with only the inspirations and opportunities afforded by the little red 
schoolhouse on the hill, in the fifties of the last century, in a neighborhood 
of small farmers to whom the raising of potatoes and grain was the chief 
aim of life. My studies were not only selfchosen, but were carried on in 
odd hours without either advice or encouragement, in contrast with the 
systematised training of today, from the primary school to the post graduate 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. AS 


course. My first systematic guidance was received at the Agassiz Museum 
in 1862; to the personality and influence of the ‘Great Teacher,’ Louts 
Acassiz, I can never adequately express my indebtedness. 


I cannot close these ‘ Notes’ without reference to the most important of 
the influences that have most happily and most strongly affected my career. 

In 1874 it was my good fortune to have won the love of Mary Manning 
‘Cleveland, of Cambridge, Mass., daughter of the late Dr. Anthony Benezet 
‘Cleveland and Mary (Manning) Cleveland, sister of the late Professor 
William C. Cleveland of Cornell University and of Dr. Clement Cleveland, 
an eminent surgeon of New York. We were married October 6, 1874. 
‘She died April 17, 1879, leaving a son, Cleveland Allen, ten months old, 
now in business in New York. Never could marital affection nor mutual 
interest and sympathy be stronger than was our lot to enjoy. When the 
end came there seemed little worth while in life. 

After seven years I had the equally good fortune to make the acquaint- 
ance of Susan Augusta Taft, daughter of the late Daniel and Emeline 
(Smith) Taft, of Cornwall-on-Hudson, N. Y. We were married April 27, 
1886, and have enjoyed thirty-one years of happiness, unalloyed except by 
her several acute but temporary illnesses, when again the light of life 
seemed vanishing. My own health during this long period having been 
by no means strong, I owe to her deep love and sympathy, to her supreme 
optimism and constant watchfulness over my health, and to her inspiration, 
the greater part of the little I may have achieved in these last thirty years, 
and doubtless many years of activity beyond those I otherwise should have 
attained. 


ADDENDA. 


EXPEDITIONS. 


1865. Zodlogical Assistant on the Thayer Expedition to Brazil, under Professor 
Louis Agassiz, April, 1865-March, 1866. 

1867. Collecting Expedition to western New York, southeastern Indiana, northern 
Illinois, western Iowa, southern Michigan, May—October, 1867. (A private 
enterprise. ) 

1868-69. East Florida: Jacksonville, via St. Johns River, to the head of Lake 
George, December, 1868—April, 1869, with two volunteer assistants (Rev. Thomas 
Marcy and J. E. Brundage). Made under the auspices of the Museum of 
Comparative Zodlogy. 

1871-72. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, west to Northern Utah, May, 1871—February, 
1872, with two assistants (Caleb W. Bennett and Richard Bliss, Jr., the latter 


44 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


from May to August). Made in the interest of the Museum of Comparative 
Zodlogy. 

1873. Bismark, North Dakota, to the Yellowstone River, thence up the Yellow- 
stone to Pompeys Pillar, north to the Musselshell River, and east to the Yellow- 
stone and Bismark. Made under the auspices of the Smithsonian Institution, 
as chief of the party of Naturalists of the North Pacific Railroad Expedition 
of 1873, Gen. D. S. Stanley, Commander. 


Positions HELpD. 


Assistant in Ornithology and Curator of Birds and Mammals in the Museum 
of Comparative Zodlogy at Harvard College, 1870-1875. 

Lecturer on Ornithology at Harvard College, 1871—1873.1 

Curator of Reptiles, Boston Society of Natural History, 1868-1871. 

Curator of Birds and Mammals, Boston Society of Natural History, 1870-1880. 

Acting Secretary, Boston Society of Natural History, October, 1874—May, 1875. 

Councilor, Boston Society of Natural History, 1881-1885. 

Corresponding Secretary, Nuttall Ornithological Club, and Editor of its ‘Bulle- 
tin,’ 1876-1883. 

President of the American Ornithologists’ Union, August, 1883 — November, 
1891. Editor of its journal ‘The Auk,’ and of its other publications, 1883-1912. 
Subcommittee (with E. Coues) to codify the rules of nomenclature for discussion 
by the full Committee on the Revision of the Nomenclature and Classification of 
North American Birds, 1883-1886. Chairman of the Committee on the Nomencla- 
ture and Classification of North American Birds, 1904-1912. Chairman of the 
Committee on Revision of the Code of Nomenclature, 1905-1908. 

Curator of Birds and Mammals at the American Museum of Natural History, 
New York, since 1885. Editor of the ‘Bulletin’ and the zodlogical series of the 
‘Memoirs,’ since 1889. 


1 A course of twelve lectures was planned but, if I remember rightly, only four or five were de- 
livered. As they were intended to treat the subject seriously they were naturally technical rather than 
‘popular,’ and the audience soon dwindled to a few students actually interested in the subject. While 
read from manuscript, they were elaborately illustrated by specimens with extemporized explanations, 
particularly as respects the osteology and pterylography of the subject. In my inexperience in such 
matters, an average attendance of half-a-dozen auditors seemed farcical, and I counted myself a failure 
as a lecturer and did not complete the course. On looking over the manuscript and the schedule of the 
course in later years I have felt chagrin that it was not completed, as the attendance was as large as 
should have been expected at a course so specialized in character. The following is the schedule of the 
course: I. The distinctive characteristics of birds in comparison with other vertebrates; birds as a 
modification of the vertebrate type for aérial locomotion; the osteology of birds. II. The muscular 
and nervous systems and the organs of sense. III. The digestive, circulatory and respiratory systems 
and vocal organs. IV. Reproductive organs and embryological development. V and VI. The 
tegumentary system, including the development of feathers, their arrangement, structure, modifications 
and functions. VII. Historical summary of the principal systems of classification. VIII, IX, and X. 
The classification of birds, with a general review of the leading groups. XI and XII. Geographical 
distribution of animals, with special reference to birds; geographical variation in birds. 

In short, the lectures were planned to form a compendium of bird-lore, and had they been com- 
pleted and published, with proper illustrations, they would have furnished in concise form a useful 
reference work for the bird student, the need for which was not supplied, even in part, till 1884, when 
Coues’s ‘General Ornithology’ was added to the second edition of his invaluable ‘Key to North Ameri- 
can Birds.’ 


AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 45 


One of the five incorporators of the (first) Audubon Society for the Protection of 
Birds, New York, 1886. 

A Founder and Director of the Audubon Society of the State of New York, 
1897-1912. 5 

Vice-President New York Academy of Sciences, 1891-1894. Member of Coun- 
cil, 1886-1896. 

President of the Linnzean Society of New York, 1890-1897. 

A Founder, Director, and member of the Executive Committee of the National 
Association of Audubon Societies, since 1905. Second Vice-President, 1908-1912. 

Member of the Commission on Zodlogical Nomenclature of the International 
Congress of Zodlogy, since 1910. 


Honors CONFERRED. 


Humboldt Scholarship, Lawrence Scientific School, Harvard College. 1871. 
Honorary Ph.D., Indiana University. 1886. ; 

Walker Grand Prize, Boston Society of Natural History. 1903. 

Medal of the Linnzan Society of New York. 1916. 


Honorary and Corresponding Memberships. 


Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston. 1871. 

Corresponding Member of the Lyceum of Natural History, New York. 1874. 

Corresponding Member Sociedad Mexicana Historia Natural, Mexico. 1874. 

Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1875. 

Member of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington. 1876. 

Corresponding Member of the Davenport Academy of Sciences, Iowa. 1877. 

Fellow of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia. 1878. 

Fellow of the American Ornithologists’ Union. 1883. (A Founder; President, 
1883-1891.) 

Honorary Member of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, Cambridge. 1886. 

Life Member of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. (By kindness of 
Morris K. Jesup.) 1887. 

Fellow of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1886. 

Honorary Member of the New York Zodélogical Society. 1887. 

Foreign Member of the British Ornithologists’ Union. 1890. Honorary 
Member since 1907. 

Foreign Member of the Zodlogical Society of London. 1891. Honorary Fellow 
since 1901. 

Honorary Member of the California Academy of Sciences. 1892. 

Corresponding Member of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 
1893. 

Extraordinary and Foreign Member of the Deutsche Verein zum Schultze der 
Vogelwelt. 1900. 

Honorary Member of the Australian Ornithologists’ Union. 1904. 

Charter Member of the American Association of Museums. 1905. 


46 ; AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES. 


Honorary Member of the Deutsche Ornithologische Gesellschaft. 1907. 
Honorary Member of the Hungarian Central Bureau of Ornithology. 1909. 
Honorary Member of the South African Ornithologists’ Union. 1909. 

Life Member of the City Library Association, Springfield, Mass. 1910. 

Active or corresponding membership is or has been held in the following So- 
cieties, mostly additional to those mentioned above: Boston Society of Natural 
History, 1862-1887 (corresponding member since 1887); Essex Institute, Salem, 
Mass., 1874-1887 (corresponding member since 1887); Torrey Botanical Club, New 
York, 1893-1909; Linnzean Society of New York, since 1885 (President, 1890-1897); 
American Society of Naturalists, since 1891; Biological Society of Washington, 


since 1882; Washington Academy of Sciences, since 1900; American Society of 


Geographers, since 1905. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Tuts Bibliography does not include hundreds of minor reviews, particu- 
larly of ornithological papers published in the ‘Bulletin’ of the Nuttall 
Ornithological Club and ‘The Auk,’! nor many of the unsigned editorial 
paragraphs in the ‘Notes and News’ department of the same journals, all 
of which, unless signed, are by the editor. It does, however, include the 
unsigned biographical notices, which, unless otherwise indicated, are by 
the editor. In the case of reviews, those omitted are usually brief an- 
nouncements of technical papers, noting little beyond the fact of their 
publication and general import, or works or papers of a more or less 
popular character, hardly entitled to consideration as serious contributions 
to science. 

The titles are arranged in nine sections: (1) Mammals, about 270 
titles; (2) Birds, about 965 titles; (3) Reptiles, 5 titles; (4) Zoégeography, 
9 titles; (5) Evolution, 22 titles; (6) Nomenclature, 27 titles; (7) Biography, 
118 titles; (8) Miscellaneous, a few titles each on botanical, geological, and 
other subjects; (9) Editorial Work. 

In the case of papers of a mixed character, like that on ‘Mammals and 
Winter Birds of East Florida,’ where four special subjects are formally 
treated under the same general title, or in the case of faunal papers which 
include mammals and birds, and in one case also reptiles and plants, titles 
are repeated under each section to which they in part formally relate; 
beyond these few special cases titles are not repeated under the different 
sectional headings, although subjects additional to that indicated by the 
title may be incidentally discussed, as in some reviews and faunal papers. 


1 Volumes I-X XVIII. My editorial connection with ‘The Auk’ closed with the issue for 
January, 1912, Volume XX XIX. 

The general indexes to these two journals contain about 1400 entries under my name, of which 
about 1250 are indicated as reviews. Of this number less than 700 are included in this bibliography. 


49 


50 


5. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


I.— MAMMALS. 
1869. 


Catalogue of the Mammals of Massachusetts, with a critical revision of the 
species. <Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., I, No. 8, pp. 148-252, Oct., 1869. 


68 species, with critical and other extended annotations. The revisional comment was 
unfortunately based largely on the literature of the subject, in the absence of actual 
specimens of many of the forms considered. 


1870. 


Notes on the Mammals of Iowa. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XIII, pp. 178- 
194, Feb., 1870. 


48 species, with brief field and critical notes. 


On the Eared Seals (Otariade), with detailed descriptions of the North Pacific 
Species, by J. A. Allen. Together with an Account of the Habits of the 
Northern Fur Seal (Callorhinus ursinus), by Charles Bryant.<Bull. Mus. 
Comp. Zoél., II, No. 1, pp. 1-108, pll. i-ii1, August, 1870. 

I. (1) Résumé of recent contributions to the natural history of the Otariade, pp. 4-19; 
(2) affinities, distinctive characters and synonymy, with remarks on sexual, age and indi- 
vidual variation, and a conspectus of the genera and species, pp. 19-45; (3) on the North 
Pacific species, pp. 45-89. II. Habits of the Northern Fur Seal, etc., by Charles Bryant, 
with notes by J. A. Allen, pp. 89-108. 

Oulophocine, p. 44, and Trichiphocine, p. 44, subfamm. nov. of Otariidee; subsequently 
abandoned. 


A Spike-horned Moose. < Amer. Nat., IV, p. 448, with 1 fig., Sept., 1870. 


Captured in northern Maine, where ‘spike-horns’ are said to be well-known to moose 
hunters. 


The Distribution of the Moose in New England. < Amer. Nat., IV, pp. 505-506, 
Nov., 1870. 


Frequent in northern Maine, scarce_in extreme northern parts of New Hampshire and 
Vermont, and in the Adirondacks in New York. 


1871. 


The Classification of the Eared Seals. < Amer. Nat., V, pp. 37-42, March, 1871. 


Reply to criticisms by Theodore Gill of my paper on the Eared Seals (supra, No. 3), in 
Amer. Nat., IV, pp. 675-684, Jan. 1871. 


The Fauna of the Prairies. < Amer. Nat., V, pp. 4-9, March, 1871. 


Mammals, passim., pp. 4-6. 


On the Mammals and Winter Birds of East Florida, with an examination of 
certain assumed specific characters in Birds, and a sketch of the Bird-faunz 
of Eastern North America. <Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., Il, No. 8, pp. 161-450, 
pll. 4-8, April, 1871. 
Annotated list of the mammals, 35 species, pp. 168-185. Trichechus manatus Linné 
employed as the name of the Manatee (p. 171). 


10. 


11. 


12. 


13. 


14. 


15. 


16. 


£7. 


= 
MAMMALS. Jv 1 


1872. 
‘““Spike-horned Muledeer.”’ << Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 692-693, Nov., 1872. 


The ‘‘Spike-horned’’ mule deer recorded in a previous number of the American Naturalist 
(July, 1872) by E. D. Cope is shown to have been a young elk. 


Description of a Specimen of Balenopterus musculus.< Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 
473-474, August, 1872. 


Review of a memoir by Thomas Dwight, Jr., on this species (Mem. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 
II, pp. 203-230, June, 1872). 


The Habits of the Orca. <Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 474-475, August, 1872. 
Review of C. M. Scammon’s paper ‘The Orca’ (Overland Monthly, July, 1872, pp. 52-57). 


[Geographical Variation in Mammals and Birds.] <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 
XV, pp. 156-159, Sept., 1872. 


Mainly in reference to birds. 
1874. 


Laws of Geographical Variation in North American Mammals and Birds. 
<Amer. Nat., VIII, pp. 227-229, April, 1874. 


In reference to R. Ridgway’s paper (Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 548-555, Sept., 1873) on the 
same subject. ; 


Notes on the Mammals of portions of Kansas, Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah. 
<Bull. Essex Inst., VI, pp. 48-66, May, 1874. 


Four distinct lists of mammals observed in the region named in the title, with notes oa 
their habits, distribution, etc. I. Mammals of Middle and Western Kansas, 28 species, 
with three pages on Cynomys ludovicianus, pp. 45-52. II. Mammals of Park County, 
Colorado, 37 species, pp. 53-58. III. Mammals of Carbon County, Wyoming, 32 species, 
pp. 58-61. IV. Mammals of Great Salt Lake Valley, Utah, 42 species, pp. 61-66. 


Notes on the Natural History of portions of Dakota and Montana, Territories, 
being the substance of a report to the Secretary of War, on the collections 
made by the North Pacific Railroad Expedition of 1873, Gen. D.S. Stanley, 
commander. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, pp. 33-91, June, 1874. 
(Also as a separate pamphlet of 61 pp., 1874.) 


Mammals, pp. 36-45 (pp. 6-13 of the reprint), 31 species; notes on habits, distribution, 
etc. 


On Geographical Variation in Color among North American Squirrels; with a 
list of the Species and Varieties of the American Sciuride occurring north 
of Mexico. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 276-294, June, 1874. 


Variation in color, pp. 276-286; list of species and varieties, pp. 286-294. Genera: 
Sciurus, Sciuropterus, Tamias, Spermophilus,'» Cynomys, Arctomys. Species, 25, with 19 
additional varieties = 44 forms. Vars. nov.: (1) Tamias quadrivittatus var. pallidus, p. 289; 
(2) Spermophilus tridecem-lineatus var. pallidus, p. 291; (3) Spermophilus parryi var. kodia- 
censis, p. 292. 


Scammon’s ‘Marine Mammals of the Northwest Coast and American Whale- 
fishery.’ < Amer. Nat., VIII, pp. 632-635, Oct., 1874. 


An appreciative review of this important work (4to). 


18. 


19. 


20. 


vale, 


22. 


23. 


24. 


20. 


26. 


28. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1875. 


Synop:'s of the American Leporide.<Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, 
1875, pp. 480-436. 


10 species, and 5 varieties = 15 forms. 


The Marine Mammals of Western North America.<The Nation, No. 501, 
Feb. 4, 1875. 


Review of Scammon’s ‘Marine Mammalia’ (cf. supra, No. 17). 


Geographical Variation in Color among Squirrels.< Amer. Nat., IX, pp. 504- 
509, Sept. 1875. 


Extended abstract, with editorial comment, of No. 16, supra. 


1876. 


The North American Bison and its Extermination.<Penn Monthly, VII, No. 
75, pp. 214-224, March, 1876. 


A general summary of the subject. 


Recent Memoirs on North American Mammals.< Amer. Nat., X, pp. 423-425, 
July, 1876. . 


Synoptic review of Theodore Gill’s ‘Synopsis of Insectivorous Mammals’ (Bull. U. S. 
Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., No. 2, May, 1875). 


The Former Range of some New England Carnivorous Mammals. <Amer. 
Nat., X, pp. 708-715, Dec., 1876. 


Citations of many early records, showing their former occurrence far south of their present 
ranges, and their great decrease in numbers as well as range. 


‘“‘Hare and Rabbit.” < Forest and Stream, VI, No. 18, p. 284, June 8, 1876. 


On the significance and use of the terms. 


A Description of a new Generic Type (Bassaricyon) of Procyonide from Costa 
Rica.<Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1876, pp. 20-28, pl. 1, April 18, 
1876. 


Bassaricyon gabbi, gen. et sp. nov. 


List of Mammals and Birds collected at Lake Titicaca, Peru. With field-notes 
by Samuel Garman. < Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., U1, No. 15, July, 1876, pp. 
349-359. 


Mammals, 10 species, pp. 349-352. 


Description of some remains of an Extinct Species of Wolf and an Extinct 
Species of Deer from the Lead Region of the Upper Mississippi. <Amer. 
Journ. Sct. and Arts, 3d ser., XI, pp. 47-51, Jan., 1876. 


Canis mississippiensis and Cervus whitney, spp. nov., p. 49. 


Geographical Variation among North American Mammals, especially in re- 
spect to size.< Bull. U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr., II, No. 4, pp. 309-344, July 1, 
1876. 


MAMMALS. De 


Relates exclusively to the fissiped Carnivora. 

“In a general way, the correlation of size with geographical distribution may be formu- 
lated in the following propositions: 

“(1) The maximum physical development of the individual is attained where the conditions 
of environment are most favorable to the life of the species. Species being primarily limited in 
their distribution by climatic conditions, their representatives living at or near either of their 
respective latitudinal boundaries are more or less unfavorably affected by the influences that 
finally limit the range of the species.... 

““(2) The largest species of a group (genus, subfamily, or family, as the case may be) are 
found where the group to which they severally belong reaches its highest development, or where it 
has what may be termed its center of distribution. In other words, species of a given group 
attain their maximum size where the conditions of existence for the group in question are the 
most favorable, just as the largest representatives of a species are found where the conditions 
are most favorable for the existence of the species. 

(3) The most ‘typical’ or most generalized representatives of a group are found also near 
its center of distribution, outlying forms being generally more or less ‘aberrant’ or specialized 
Thus the Cervide, though nearly cosmopolitan in their distribution, attain their greatest 
development, both as respects the size and the number of the species, in the temperate 
portions of the northern hemisphere. The tropical species of this group are the smallest of 
its representatives. Those of the temperate and cold temperate regions are the largest, 
where, too, the species are the most numerous....The possession of large, branching, de- 
ciduous antlers forms one of the marked features of the family. These appendages attain 
their greatest development in the northern species, the tropical forms having them reduced 


almost to mere spikes, which in some species never pass beyond a rudimentary state....” 
(p. 310). 


.29. Geographical Variation among North American Mammals, especially in re- 
spect to size.< Amer. Nat., X, pp. 625-627, Oct., 1876. 
Abstract of the preceding (No. 28). 


30. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Kentucky. | N. S. Shaler, director. | Vol. 
I, Part ii. |— | The American bisons, | living and extinct. | By J. A. Allen. | 


With twelve plates and map. |-—| University press, Cambridge: | Welch, 
Bigelow, & Co. | 1876. Also: 


Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy,| at Harvard College, Cambridge, 
Mass. | Vol. IV, No. 10. |— | The American bisons, living and extinct: | By J. A. Allen. | 
Published by permission of N. S. Shaler, director of the Kentucky | Geological Survey. 
With 12 plates and a map. | University press, Cambridge: | Welch, Bigelow, & Co. | 1876. 

4°, pp. i-ix, 1-246, 1 col. map, 12 pll., 131l., 2 woodcuts in text. Edition of 500 copies. 


These two publications were simultaneous, and only differ in the titles. The following 
are the contents: — 


Title, p. i. 
Preliminary note (by N.S. Shaler), p. iii. 
Introduction, pp. v—ix. 


Part I. 


a 
° 


Distinctive characteristics and affinities of the bisons, pp. 1-3. 

2. General historical account of the remains of extinct bisons hitherto found in North 
America, pp. 3-7. 

Description of the extinct species, pp. 7-31. 

4. Geographical distribution and geological position of the remains of the extinct bisons of 
North America, pp. 32-35. 

Relation of the existing species of bisons to the extinct species, pp. 35-36. 

6. Description of the existing species, pp. 36-70. 


iS) 


Or 


Part II. 


Geographical distribution, past and present, of Bison americanus, pp. 71-191. 
Products of the buffalo, pp. 191-201. 

The chase, pp. 202-215. 

Domestication of the buffalo, pp. 215-221. 


Be ete 


54 


31. 


32. 


33. 


34, 


30. 


36. 


. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Appendix I. Additional notes on the former range and early abundance of the bison east 
of the Mississippi River, pp. 223-231. 
Appendix II. On the age of the bison in the Ohio Valley, by N.S. Shaler, pp. 232-236. 


Index, pp. 237-246. 
Map, colored, to illustrate the geographical distribution, past and present, of Bison ameri- 
' canus, and 12 plates, each with unpaged explanatory leaf: pl. i, horncores of Bison 
latifrons; pl. ii, atlas of B. latifrons and B. americanus; pl. iii, teeth of B. antiquus and 
B. americanus; pl. iv, skull of B. antiquus; pll. v and vi, individual variation in skulls of 
B. americanus; pl. vii, skulls of B. americanus and B. bonasus, and tarsal bones of B. 
americanus and B. latifrons?; pl. viii, horns of B. americanus and B. antiquus; pl. ix, 
milk dentition of B. americanus; pl. x, stages of attrition due to age in teeth of B. ameri- 
canus; pl. ix, metacarpal bones of B. americanus; pl. xii, molar-premolar series in B. 
americanus and Bos taurus. 


Recent Contributions to North American Mammalogy.<Amer. Nat., X, pp. 
362-365, June, 1876. (Anonymous.) 


Review of Coues’s ‘Synopsis of the Muridez (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1874) 
and his ‘Some Account....of Zapus hudsonius’ (Bull. U. S. Geol. Surv. Torr., Ser. 2, No. 5, 


Jan., 1871. 


Exploration of Lake Titicaca, by Alexander Agassiz and 8. W. Garman. III. 
List of Mammals and Birds, with Field Notes by Mr. Garman. < Bull. Mus. 
Comp. Zodl., III, pp. 349-359, July, 1876. 

Mammals, pp. 350-353; 10 species. [Accidental duplication of No. 26, supra.] 


The Extirpation of the larger Indigenous Mammals in the United States. 
<Penn. Monthly, pp. 794-806, Oct., 1876. 


1877. 


History of the American Bison, Bison americanus.<Ninth Ann. Rep. U. S. 
Geol. Surv. Terr. for the year 1875, pp. 448-587, June, 1877. Edition of 
7000 copies; also separate, 1000 copies. 

A republication of the original memoir (see supra, No. 30) under Dr. Coues’s editorship, 
exclusive of the map and plates, with the following changes: — 
1. The omission of the illustrations, explanatory pages, and textual references. 
2. The omission of the portion relating to the extinct species, the present reprint being 
confined to the one existing species, beginning at page 36 of the original. 

3. The incorporation of the appendices in the body of the text. 
4. The addition of much new matter by the author himself. 
5. Various minor modifications with the slight alteration, chiefly verbal, of context 


incident thereto. 
6. Alteration of the title and substitution of editorial preface for the preliminary matter 


of the original. 
“‘ No editorial abridgment or digest of any part of the memoir was made, the portions of 


the memoir here reproduced being according to copy furnished by author, who added much 
new matter and made some little changes passim in the context. A few editorial notes, 
chiefly explanatory of modifications of the text, are introduced in brackets.’’ — E. Coues, 


editor. 
Additional note on Bassaricyon gabbi. <Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1877, 
pp. 267-268, pl. i. 


By error, a description and figure of Nasua narica. 


Monographs of North American Rodentia. By Ellott Coues and Joel Asaph 
Allen. = Report of the U.S. Geol. Survey of the Territories (F. V. Hayden, 


ee 


MAMMALS. 55 


U. 8S. Geol.-in-Charge), Vol. XI. Washington: Govern. Printing Office, 
August, 1877. 4°, pp. i-x, 1—-1091, pll. i-v. 


The following by J. A. Allen: — 

Monograph II. Leporide, pp. 265-378. Mon. III. Hystricide, pp. 379-398. Mon. 
IV. Lagomyide, pp. 399-414. Mon. V. Castoroidide, pp. 415-426. Mon. VI. Casto- 
ride, pp. 427-454. Mon. XI. Sciuride, pp. 631-940. Appendix A. Synoptical List of 
the Fossil Rodentia of North America, pp. 943-950. 

Fam. nov. Castoroidide, p. 419; Lepus sylvaticus var. arizone, var. nov., p. 332; Lepus 
graysoni, sp. nov., p. 347; Lepus brasiliensis var. gabbi, var. nov., p. 419; Tamias asiaticus 
var. borealis, var. nov., p. 793. 

Respecting Mon. XI, Sciuride, see Allen, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXIV, p. 153, 
May 17, 1915 (infra, No. 259). 


37. Material for Bibliography of North American Mammals. Prepared by Theo- 


38. 


39. 


40. 


41. 


dore Gill and Elliott Coues. Appendix B to Coues and Allen’s ‘Monographs 
of North American Rodentia,’ pp. 951-1081, August, 1877. 


“In the labor of preparing this matter for the press, which has devolved upon Dr. Coues, 
much assistance has been rendered by Mr. Allen, who has kindly revised the proofs, adding 
some titles, and making many valuable suggestions.’’ — Gill and Coues, l. c., p. 951. 

““Q.— Addenda”’ to the foregoing, pp. 1074-1081. ‘“‘For most of the following titles, 
about 250, the compilers are indebted to the kind attentions of Mr. J. A. Allen. They were 
received during the printing of the Bibliography, but too late for insertion under their proper 
heads, and represent, in particular, many important palzontological papers by Leidy, Marsh 
and Cope.’’— Gill and Coues, l. c., p. 1074. 


Northern Range of the Bison. << Amer. Nat., XI, No. 10, Oct., 1877, p. 624. 


Its presence on the Peace and Hay Rivers, near Great Slave Lake, recorded on informa- 
tion received from E. W. Nelson. 


American Insectivorous Mammals.<Amer. Nat., XI, No. 10, Oct., 1877, pp. 
613-615. (Anonymous. ) 


Review of Coues’s ‘Precursory Notes on American Insectivorous Mammals,’ etc. (Bull. 
U.S. Geol. Surv. Terr., 111, pp. 631-653, May, 1877). 


North American Fur-bearing Animals.<Amer. Nat., XI, No. 10, Oct., 1877, 
pp. 617-619. (Anonymous.) 


Review of Coues’s ‘‘ Fur-bearing Animals,”’ 1877. 


Cope’s Vertebrate Palawontology of New Mexico.<Amer. Nat., XI, No. 12, 
Dec., 1877, pp. 750-753. (Anonymous.) 
Review of Vol. IV, pt. ii, of Report U. S. Geogr. Surv. West of One Hundredth Meridian. 


1878. 


The Geographical Distribution of the Mammals, considered in relation to the 
principal ontological regions of the earth, and the laws that govern the dis- 
tribution of animal life.<Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, No. 2, 
pp. 313-377, May, 1878. 


Contents: —I. Distribution of mammalian life in the Northern Hemisphere, considered 
in relation to laws of geographical distribution, pp. 313-329.— Historical résumé, with critical 
analysis of views of Sclater and Wallace. 

II.— Mammalian regions of the Globe, pp. 329-373.— (1) Arctic Realm; (2) North 
Temperate Realm; (3) Tropical Realm; (4) South American Temperate Realm; (5) Indo- 
African Realm; (6) Australian Realm; (7) Lemurian Realm; (8) Antarctic Realm. 

The realms are divided into regions and provinces. 

III.— General Summary, pp. 373-377, with diagram of realms, regions and provinces. 


56 


43. 


44. 


45. 


46. 


47. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Synonymatic list of the American Sciuri, or Arboreal Squirrels. <Bull. U. S. 
Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, No. 4, pp. 877-887, 905, Dec., 1878. 


Revised list of species, with nomenclatural changes from the Monograph of the Sciuridz 
in Coues and Allen’s “Monographs of North American Rodentia,’ 1877 (see supra, No. 
36). 


1879. 


On the Coatis (genus Nasua Storr).<Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., 
V, No. 2, pp. 153-174, Sept., 1879. 


Monographic revision of the genus Nasua. 


On the Species of the Genus Bassaris.<Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., 
V, No. 3, pp. 331-340, Nov., 1879. 


Monographic revision of the genus Bassaris¢ 


1880. 


The Fauna of Eastern Massachusetts: Forms brought in and expelled by Civi- 
lization. <Memorial History of Boston, edited by Justin Winsor, I, 1880, 


Chap. ii, pp. 9-16. 


Relates to mammals only. 


History of North American Pinnipeds: A Monograph of the Walruses, Sea- 
lions, Sea-bears and Seals of North America. Washington: Govern. Print- 
ing Office, 1880. = U.S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Territories (F. V. Hayden, 
U. S. Geol.-in-Charge), Miscel. Publ. No. 11. 8°, pp. i-xvi, 1-785, 60 


woodcuts. 


Family Odobenide, pp. 5-186. Odobenus Brisson (1762) the proper generic name for 
the walruses, and Odobznide the proper name for the family — not Trichechus (auct. non 
Linné), nor Trichechide, which are, respectively, the proper names of the Manatees;! two 
species of walrus established, O. rosmarus (Linn.) and O. obesus (Illiger), with figures of skulls, 
and full history of each species, including the nomenclature, osteology and dentition, geo- 
graphical distribution, chase and commercial products. 

Family Otariide, pp. 187-411. Technical and commercial history, with synopsis, charac- 
ters, and geographic distribution of the extra-limital species, recent and fossil, as well as the 
North American. 

Family Phocide, pp. 412-756. Technical history of the family, classification, synony- 
matic list of the genera and species, geographical distribution, fossil remains, milk-dentition, 
habits, migrations, locomotion on land, the seal-hunting industry and sealing-grounds, 
methods of capture, species hunted, products, decrease of seals from injudicious hunting, etc., 
pp. 412-557; systematic treatment of the North American species, pp. 557-756; Appendix: 
a, material examined (pp. 757-764); 6, additions and corrections (pp. 765-773); index (pp. 
775-785). 

‘“*A most valuable and complete history of these animals, especially of those found in 
North America, of their distribution and pursuit, with full synonymy, and copious tables and 
references. The history of the species of the group generally is also discussed, with remarks 
on their synonymy and distribution.’’— Zool. Rec. for 1880, Mamm. p. 2. 


1 I employed Trichechus manatus Linné for the Florida Manatee as early as 1871 (see supra, No. 8). 


7 
. 
t 
i 


MAMMALS. 57 


1881. 


48. List of Mammals collected by Dr. Edward Palmer in Northeastern Mexico, 
with field-notes by the collector.<Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., VIII, No. 9, 
March, 1881, pp. 183-189. 


Annotated list of 25 species. Heteromys alleni Coues, sp. nov., ined., p. 187. 


1882. 


49. Preliminary List of Works and Papers relating to the Mammalian Orders Cete 
and Sirenia.<Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv., VI, No. 3, pp. 399-562, 
Aug. 30, 1882. 


Covers the period from Albertus Magnus (1495) to the year 1840, and numbers 1013 
annotated titles, the annotations in many cases amounting to a full statement of contents, 
so far as pertinent to the present subject, including names of species and genera and nature 
of treatment. All thus far published. The cause of the discontinuance of publication is 
explained in an insert, as follows: 

‘Owing to the illness of the author, which prevented his revision of the proof-sheets, it 
was necessary to stop the printing of the ‘List’ at the end of the year 1840. The present 
instalment comprises only a little more than one-third of the article; the remainder will be 
published as soon as the author’s health renders it practicable.— J. A. ALLEN, Cambridge, 
Sept., 1882.” 

See further, a ‘Personal Note’ in Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XIV, 1908, pp. 279-280. 


1885. 


50. Capture of the Crested Seal on the Coast of Massachusetts. < Science, I, No. 19, 
pp. 542-543, June 15, 1883. 


51. The Right Whale of the North Atlantic.<Science, I, No. 21, pp. 598-599, 
June 29, 1883. 


Review of Dr. J. B. Holder’s paper on this subject (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., I, pp. 
99-137, pll. x—xili, May 30, 1883). 


52. The Right Whale of the North Atlantic. <Science, II, No. 26, p. 1384, Aug. 3, 
1883. 
Reply to Dr. Holder’s rejoinder to above. 


53. The Right Whale of the North Atlantic. <Science, II, No. 30, p. 267, Aug. 31, 
1883. 
Reply to a second rejoinder by Dr. Holder. 


1884. 


54. How long the Buffaloes remained in Illinois.< American Field, XXII, p. 128, 
Aug. 9, 1884. 


Remained till as late as 1805, and were not wholly extirpated till 1808 or 1809; not 
wholly destroyed by a heavy snowfall in 1763, as stated by a previous correspondent. 


55. The Mammals of the Adirondacks. <Science, IV, 1884, pp. 445-446. 


Review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s ‘ Vertebrates of the Adirondack Region, Northeastern 
New York,’ Chap. II, Mammals (Trans. Linn. Soc. New York, I, 1882, pp. 27-106; II, 1884, 
pp. 9-214). 


58 


56. 


57. 


58. 


59. 


60. 


61. 


62. 


64. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1885. 


What is the Present Distribution of the American Bison? <Forest and Stream, 
XXIV, No. 8, p. 145, March 19, 1885. 


A request for exact information as to its present numbers and distribution. 


Prairie Dog Wells. <Forest and Stream, XXIV, No. 8, p. 145, March 19, 1885. 


No evidence that prairie dogs ever burrow for water, but evidence to the contrary, and 
against considering ‘‘the prairie dog as a water witch,’’ as believed by a previous corre- 
spondent. 


On an Extinct Type of Dog from Ely Cave, Lee County, Virginia. <Mem. 
Mus. Comp. Zo6l., X, No. 2, pp. 1-8, pll. 1-1, Dec. 1885. 
Pachycyon robustus sp. nov., p. 4. With ‘On the Age of the Ely Cave,’ by N.S. Shaler. 


1887. 


The West Indian Seal (Monachus tropicalis).<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
II, pp. 1-84, pll. iv, April 25, 1887. 
Introduction, pp. 1-3; external characters, pp. 4-6; osteological characters, pp. 6-19; 


sexual differences, pp. 20-21; affinities of the genus Monachus, pp. 22-23; general history, 
pp. 23-26; geographical distribution, pp. 27-29; habits, pp. 29-34. 


Note on Squalodont Remains from Charleston, 8. C.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., U1, pp. 34-39, pll. v—vi, April 25, 1887. 


Squalodon tiedemani, sp. nov., p. 34. Based on the rostral portion of a skull, with teeth 
in silu. 


The West Indian Seal. <Sczence, IX, No. 206, p. 35, Jan. 14, 1887. 


Capture of specimens by Henry A. Ward at the Triangles, off Yucatan. Habits and 


distinguishing characters. 


The West Indian Seal. <Science, 1X, No. 207, p. 59, Jan. 21, 1887. 


Notice of a paper on this species by F. W. True and F. A. Lucas, published in 1886, based 
on a female specimen taken near Havana, Cuba, in 1883. 


1888. 


List of Important Publications relating to Mammals. <Kingsley’s Riverside 
Natural History, V, 1888, pp. 529-534. 
About 130 titles. 


1889. 


Notes on a Collection of Mammals from Southern Mexico, with descriptions 
of new species of the genera Sciurus, Tamias, and Sigmodon. <Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., 11, pp. 165-181, Oct. 21, 1889. 


An annotated list of 16 species. Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Sciurus alstoni, p. 167 (name 
preoccupied and changed to nayaritensis, p. vii of same volume and Vol. III, p. 185); (2) 
Tamias asiaticus bulleri, p. 173; (3) Tamias asiaticus merriami, p. 176; (4) Sigmodon fulvi- 
venter, p. 180. 


MAMMALS. 59 


65. Former Range of the Buffalo in Virginia.<New York Evening Post, Dec. 10, 
1889. 


Not found in the immediate vicinity of Washington, as alleged by a previous correspond- 
ent, but on the upper James River, 


1890. 


66. On Seasonal Variations in Color in Sciurus hudsontus.< Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., II, pp. 41-44, June, 1890. 


Based on a series of about 60 specimens, taken at Hastings, New York, and representing 
nearly every month of the year. 


67. A Review of some of the North American ground Squirrels of the genus Tamas. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, pp. 45-116, June, 1890. 


24 species and subspecies are recognized, of which 13 are here first described, as follows: 
(1) Tamias obscurus, p. 70; (2) T. senex, p. 83; (3) T. speciosus (Merriam, ined. MS.), p. 86; 
(4) T. frater, p. 88; (5) T. amenus, p. 90; (6) T. cinereicollis, p. 94; (7) T. umbrinus, p. 96; 
(8) T. quadrivittatus gracilis, p. 99; (9) T. q. lutewentris, p. 101; (10) T. q. affinis, p. 103; 
(11) T. q. neglectus, p. 106; (12) T. minimus consobrinus, p. 112; (13) T. m. pictus, p. 115. 


68. Notes on a small collection of West Indian Bats, with description of an ap- 
parently new species.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, pp. 169-173, 
Nov. 14, 1890. 


An annotated list of 8 species, with critical comment on Artibeus “* perspicillatus (Linn.).”’ 
Artibeus coryl, sp. nov., p. 173. 


69. Notes on collections of Mammals made in Central and Southern Mexico, by 
Dr. Audley C. Buller, with descriptions of new species of the genera Ves- 
pertilio, Sciurus, and Lepus.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 111, pp. 175-194, 
Dec. 10, 1890. 


Annotated list of 44 species, with additional notes on 3 species of Mexican Leporide. Spp. 
noy.: (1) Vespertilio velifer, p. 177; (2) Sciurus cervicalis, p. 183; (3) Lepus sylvaticus azle- 
cus, p. 188; (4) Lepus insolitus, p. 189; (5) Lepus truei, p. 192. 


70. Descriptions of a New Species and a New Subspecies of the Genus Lepus. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., U1, pp. 159-160, Oct., 1890. 


(1) Lepus cinerascens, p. 159; (2) Lepus sylvaficus floridanus, p. 160. 


71. List of Mammals collected by Mr. Clark P. Streator in British Columbia, with 
descriptions of two new subspecies of Sciwrus.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
III, pp. 161-168. 


Annotated list of 20 species. Subspp. nov.: (1) Sciurus hudsonius vancouverensis, p. 
165; (2) S.h. californicus, p. 165. 


139: 


72. Description of a new species of Big-eared Bat, of the genus Histiotus, from 
Southern California. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., UI, pp. 195-198, Feb. 
20, 1891. 


Histiotus maculatus, sp. nov., p. 195. Later the type of the genus Euderma H. Allen, 
1892. 


60 


73. 


74, 


75. 


76. 


77. 


78. 


79. 


80. 


81. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Notes on a Collection of Mammals from Costa Rica.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., III, pp. 208-218, April 17, 1891. 


38 species, the following new: (1) Blarina costaricensis,1 p. 205; (2) Hesperomys (Vesperi- 
mus) cherriet, p. 211; (3) Hesperomys (Vesperimus) nudipes, p. 213; (4) Hesperomys (Ory- 
zomys) alfarot, p. 214. 


On a Collection of Mammals from Southern Texas and Northeastern Mexico. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, pp. 219-228, April 17, 1891. 


An annotated list of 31 species, the following new: (1) Scalops argentatus texanus, p. 221; 
(2) Dipodops sennetti, p. 226. 


Description of a new species of Capromys, from the Plana Keys, Bahamas. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, pp. 8329-336, Aug. 31, 1891. 


Capromys ingrahami, p. 329, sp. nov. 


Notes on new or little-known North American Mammals, based on recent ad- 
ditions to the Collection of Mammals in the American Museum of Natural 
History.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, pp. 263-310, June 30, 1891. 


Extended remarks on Heteromys alleni Coues, Dipodomys phillipsii Gray, Neotoma micro- 
pus Baird, Hesperomys indianus Wied (= Mus musculus Linn.), the generic name Hesperomys 
Waterhouse, and Mus agrarius americanus Kerr (1771) vs. Hesperomys leucopus auctoram 
(strictly, vs. Mus sylvaticus noveboracensis Fischer, 1829). Mus agrarius americanus shown 
later to be unavailable in this connection, through a previous Mus americanus Kerr. 

Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Dipodops ordii palmert, p. 276; (2) Dipodops richardsoni, p. 277; 
(3) Perognathus (Chetodipus) femoralis, p. 281; (4) Neotoma micropus canescens, p. 285; 
(5) Oryzomys aquaticus p. 289; (6) Vesperimus difficilis, p. 298; (7) Vesperimus nasutus, 
p. 299; (8) Vesperimus mearnsii, p. 300. 


Recent work in North American Mammalogy.<Trans. New York Acad. Sci., 
X, No. 5, 1891, pp. 71-85. 


A review of ‘‘recent progress”’ (1857-1891) in North American mammalogy. 


Descriptions of two supposed new species of Mice from Costa Rica and Mexico, 
with remarks on Hesperomys melanophrys of Coues.<Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 
XIV, pp. 193-196, 1891. 


Spp. nov.: (1) Oryzomys talamance, p. 193; (2) Hesperomys (Vesperimus) affinis, p. 195. 


1892. 


Description of a new species of Perognathus from Southeastern Texas. <Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, pp. 45-46, pl. ii, March 25, 1892. 


Perognathus merriami, p. 45. 


On a small collection of Mammals from the Gallapagos Islands, collected by 
Dr. G. Baur. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, pp. 47-50, March 25, 1892. 


4 species, 2 new, as follows: (1) Atalapha brachyotis, p. 47; (2) Oryzomys bauri, p. 48. 


The Geographical Distribution of North American Mammals.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., TV, pp. 199-244, pll. v—vii (maps). 


Influences determining the geographic distribution of life (climatic), pp. 199-200; inter- 
relation of land areas, pp. 200-201); mammals as the basis for the classification of life areas, 


1 Based on alcoholic specimens collected in all probability in the United States, wrongly attributed 


to Costa Rica, whence they were received by the author. 


— 


ee 


82. 


83. 
84. 
85. 


86. 


87. 


88. 


89. 


90. 


MAMMALS. 61 


pp. 202-203; systematic classification of life areas, pp. 203-211; the Sclaterian system, pp. 
211-212; the mammals of North America considered in relation to the North American 
Region and its subdivisions, pp. 213-240, with 3 maps. 


A synopsis of the Pinnipeds, or Seals and Walruses, in relation to their com- 
mercial history and products.<Fur-seal Arbitration. Appendix to the 
case of the United States before the Tribunal of Arbitration, etc., I, 1892, 
pp. 367-391. 


Fur-seal Hunting in the Southern Hemisphere. <J/bid., pp. 393-404. 
The Alaskan Fur-seal and Pelagic Sealing. </bid., pp. 405-410. 


Visitors’ Guide to the Collection of Mammals in the American Museum of 
Natural History, Seventy-Seventh Street and Eighth Avenue, New York 
City. By J. A. Allen, Ph.D., Curator. New York: Printed for the Museum. 
1892. 8°, pp. 1-89. Diagram of hall and 24 cuts in text. 


1893. 


Rabbits and Hares.<Our Animal Friends, XX, No. 11, July, 1893, pp. 248- 
251. 


List of Mammals and Birds collected in Northeastern Sonora and North- 
western Chihuahua, Mexico, on the Lumholtz Archeological Expedition, 
1890-92.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 27-42, March 16, 1898. 


Mammals, 17 species, pp. 28-32. Sciurus apache, sp. nov., p. 29. 


Descriptions of Four New Species of Thomomys, with remarks on other Species 
of the Genus.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 47-63, pl. i, April 28, 
1893. 


I. Descriptions of spp. nov.: (1) Thomomys monticolus, p. 48; (2) T. aureus, p. 49; (3) 
T. fossor, p. 51; (4) T. toltecus, p. 52. II. Questions of nomenclature, pp. 53-64. III. 
Cranial characters, pp. 64-65. IV. Species and subspecies of the genus Thomomys, pp. 
66-67. 


List of Mammals collected by Mr. Charles P. Rowley in the San Juan Region 
of Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, with descriptions of new species. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 64-84, April 28, 1893. 


Annotated list of 34 species. Spp.noy.: (1) Zapus princeps, p.71; (2) Arvicola (Mynomes) 
aztecus, p. 73; (38) Reithrodontomys aztecus, p. 79; Sitomys auripectus, p. 75; S.rowleyi, p. 76. 


On a Collection of Mammals from the San Pedro Martir Region of Lower 
California, with notes on other species, particularly of the genus Sitomys. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 181-202, August 18, 1893. 


Annotated list of 9 species. Spp. and subspp. nov.: (1) Sitomys americanus thurberi, 
p. 185; (2) S. martirensis, p. 187; (3) S. gilberti, p. 188; (4) Tamias leucurus peninsule, 
p. 197; (5) Scapanus anthonyi, p. 200. 

Hesperomys gambelii Baird — type locality fixed as Monterey, Cal., p. 190; Hesperomys 
boylet Baird — type locality fixed as Middle Fork of the American River, El Dorado Co., 
Cal., p. 192; Hesperemys austerus Baird — type locality fixed as Fort Steilacoom, Puget 
Sound, p. 192. 


62 


91. 


92. 


93. 


94. 


95. 


96. 


97. 


98. 


oo) 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


On a Collection of Mammals from the Island of Trinidad, with descriptions of 
new species. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 203-234, Sept. 21, 1893. 
(With Frank M. Chapman.) 

Annotated list of 34 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Cheronycteris intermedia, p. 207; (2) Nec- 
tomys palmipes, p. 209; (3) Tylomys couesi, p. 211; (4) Oryzomys speciosus, 212; (5) O. 
trinitatis, p. 213; (6) O. velutinus, p. 214; (7) O. brevicauda, p. 215; (8) Loncheres castaneus, 
p. 222; (9) Echimys trinitatis, p. 223. 

List of known land mammals from Trinidad (65 species), pp. 231-234. 


Further Notes on Costa Rican Mammals, with description of a new species of 
Oryzomys. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 237-240, Sept. 22, 1893. 


Annotated list of 18 species. O. costaricensis, sp. nov., p. 239. 


Description of a new species of Opossum, from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, 
Mexico. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, pp. 235-236, Sept. 22, 1893. 


Didelphys (Micoureus) canescens, sp. nov., p. 235. 


Description of a new Mouse from Lake County, California. < Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., V, pp. 335, 336, Dec. 16, 18938. 


Sitomys robustus, p. 335. 


Description of a new species of Geomys from Costa Rica. < Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., V, pp. 337, 338, Dec. 16, 1893. 


Geomys cherriei, p. 337. 
1894. 


Notes on Mammals from New Brunswick, with Description of a new Species. 
of Evotomys.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, pp. 99-106, April 14, 1894. 


Annotated list of 33 species. Evotomys fuscodorsalis sp. nov., p. 103. Later found to be: 
a melanistic phase of FL. gapperi (see infra, No. 139). 


On the Seasonal Change of Color in the Varying Hare (Lepus americanus Erxl.).. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, pp. 107-128, April 14, 1894. 


Change due to moult, not to change of color of the hair. Based on the study of about. 
75 specimens collected in New Brunswick. 


On the Mammals of Aransas County, Texas, with descriptions of new forms. 
of Lepus and Oryzomys.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, pp. 165-198, 
May 31, 1894. 

Annotated list of 36 species. Subspp. nov.: (1) Lepus sylvaticus mearnsii p. 171 (foot= 
note);. (2) Oryzomys palustris texensis, p. 177. 

Table of cranial measurements and ratios of 34 North American specimens of the genus 
Mephitis (insert, facing p. 190); note on variability of coloration in species of Mephitis, 
pp. 192-196. % 


Cranial Variations in Neotoma micropus due to Growth and Individual Differ- 
entiation. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, 1894, pp. 2383-246, pl. iv, 
August 3, 1894. 


100. Remarks on Specimens of Chilonycteris rubiginosus from Western Mexico, 


and on the Color Phases of Péeronotus davyi Gray.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., V1, 1894, pp. 247-248, August 3, 1894. 


101. 


102. 


103. 


104. 


105. 


106. 


MAMMALS. 63: 


Descriptions of ten new North American Mammals, and remarks on others. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, 1894, pp. 317-333, Nov. 7, 1894. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Perognathus pricei, p. 318; (2) Perognathus conditi, p. 318; (3) 
Reithrodontomys mexicanus fulvescens, p. 319; (4) Arvicola leucopheus, p. 320; (5) Sitomys: 
americanus arizone, p. 321; (6) Neotoma campestris, p. 322; (7) Neotoma rupicola, p. 323; (8) 
Neotoma grangeri, p. 324; (9) Sciurus hudsonicus dakolensis, p. 325; (10) Phenacomys truei,. 
p. 331. Remarks on Arvicola haydenii Baird and A. cinnamomeus Baird. 


Recent Progress in the Study of North American Mammals. < Abst. Proc. 
Linnean Soc. New York, for the year ending March 27, 1894, pp. 17-45,. 
July 20, 1894. 


A review of recent methods and results, with lists of the North American species of Lepus,. 
Heteromys, Perognathus, Dipodomys, Perodipus, Thomomys, Geomys, Phenacomys, Evotomys, 
Arvicola, Neotoma, Sigmodon, Oryzomys, Sitomys, Sciurus, Tamias, Spermophilus, etc., ini 
illustration of the subject. 


Descriptions of five new North American Mammals.< Bull. Amer. Mus.. 
Nat. Hist., VI, 1894, pp. 347-350, Dec. 7, 1894. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Arvicola insperatus, p. 347; (2) Lepus terianus eremicus, p. 3473. 
(3) Lepus sylvaticus pinetis, p. 348; (4) Sciurus arizonensis huachuca, p. 349; (5) Sciurus: 
hudsonicus grahamensis, p. 350. 


Remarks on a Second Collection of Mammals from New Brunswick, and on. 
the Re-discovery of the Genus Neotoma in New York State.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., V1, 1894, pp. 359-364, Dec. 22, 1894. 


Notes on 7 species, pp. 359-361. Capture of Neotoma pennsylvanicus Stone on Storm 
King Mountain, Orange Co., N. Y.; and reference to its long previous record of occurrence: 
at Piermont, Rockland Co., N. Y., pp. 362-364. 


1895. 


On the Species of the Genus Reithrodontomys.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
VII, 1895, pp. 107-143, May 21, 1895. 


A monographic revision; 15 species and subspecies recognized, the following new: (1) 

R. merriami, p. 119; (2) R. dychei, p. 120; (3) R. dychet nebrascensis, p. 122; (3) R. megalotis 

. deserli, p. 127; (4) R. arizonensis, p. 134; (5) R. mexicanus intermedius, p. 136; (6) R. m. 
aurantius, p. 137; (7) R. costaricensis, p. 139. 


On the Names of Mammals given by Kerr in his ‘ Animal Kingdom,’ published 
in 1792.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, pp. 179-192, June 20, 1895. 


Four generic and 16 specific names antedate current names taken from later authors; 
as follows: Myocastor = Myopotamus Geoffroy, 1805 (p. 182); Cricetus = Cricetus Cuvier, 
1817 (p. 183); Myotalpa = Siphneus Brants, 1827 (p. 183); Lynx = Lynz Rafinesque, 
1818 (p. 182). The necessary changes in specific names ace: 

Cercocebus torquatus (Kerr) = C. collaris Gray, 1843 (p. 185). 

Nasalis nasuus (Kerr) ‘= N. nasalis (Shaw), 1800 (p. 186). 

Colobus badius (Kerr) = C. ferruginea (Shaw), 1800 (p. 186). 

Cebus albulus (Kerr) = C. hypoleucus Humb., 1811 (p. 186). 

Priodon maximus (Kerr) = P. gigas (Cuvier), 1817 (p. 187). 

Mastodon americanus (Kerr) = M. giganteus Cuvier, 1817 (p. 187). 

Canis australis Kerr = C. antarcticus Shaw, 1800 (p. 188). 

Crocidura cerulea (Kerr) = C. cerulescens (Shaw), 1800 (p. 188). 

Petaurus norfolcensis (Kerr) = P. sciurea (Shaw), 1794 (p. 190). 

Alce fossilis (Kerr) [= A. gigantea! Blumenb., 1799 (p. 191).] 


1 By error “‘ Cervus giganteus Goldfuss, 1821” is cited instead of Alce giganteus Blumenbach, 1799. 


64 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Mazama temama (Kerr) = M. tema Rafinesque,! 1817. 

Ovis europxa (Kerr) = O. musimon Auct. ex Pallas, 1811 (p. 192). 

Lynx texensis nom. nov. (p. 188) is given to replace Felis maculata Horfs. and Vigors 
(1829), preoccupied by Felis (Lynx) vulgaris maculatus Kerr, for the Texas lynx. 


107. Ona Collection of Mammals from Arizona and Mexico, made by Mr. W. W. 
Price, with Field Notes by the Collector.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
VII, pp. 193-258, fig. 1-17, June 29, 1895. 


Annotated list of 70 species collected and 16 others observed but not collected, making 
a total of 86 species, with important field notes, extended measurements and technical com- 
ment. 

Cervus hemionus Raf., 1817, replaces C. macrotis Say, 1823; Ovis cervina Desm., replaces 
O. canadensis Shaw. Thomomys cervinus, sp. nov., p. 203. 


108. List of Mammals collected in the Black Hills Region of South Dakota and in 
Western Kansas by Mr. Walter W. Granger, with Field Notes by the Col- 
lector. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, pp. 259-274, August 21, 1895. 


Annotated list of 53 spp. Lepus sylvaticus grangeri subsp. nov., p. 264. 


109. Descriptions of new American Mammals.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
VII, pp. 327-340, Nov. 8, 1895. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Lepus aquaticus attwateri, p. 327; (2) Reithrodontomys australis, 
p. 328; (3) Oryzomys cherriei, p. 329; (4) Peromyscus attwateri, p. 330; (5) Neotoma cinna- 
momea, p. 331; (6) Sciurus (Microsciurus, subgen. nov.) alfari, p. 333; (7) Tamias pricet, 
p. 333; (8) Tamias wortmani, p. 335; (9) Spermophilus tridecemlineatus olivaceus, p. 337; 
(10) S. £. parvus, p. 337; (11) Blarina (Soriciscus) nigrescens, p. 339; (12) B. (S.) orophila, 
p. 340. 


110. Monographic Revision of the Pocket Gophers, Family Geomyide (exclusive 
of the genus Thomomys).<Science, N.S8., I, pp. 241-248, March 1, 1895. 
Review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s paper of this title in NV. Am. Fauna, No. 8, 1895. 


111. The Pocket Gophers of the United States.<Science, N. 8., I, pp. 689-690, 
June 21, 1895. 
Review of paper by Vernon Bailey in Bull. No. 5, U. S. Dept. Agric., 1895. 


112. Those Pocket Gophers. Another Contribution about the Literature and 
Habits of the Geomyide.<New York Sun (newspaper), Feb. 26, 1895. 


A humorous reply to abusive criticism of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s ‘Monographic Revision 
of the Pocket Gophers’ (IV. Amer. Fauna, No. 8, Jan. 1895), under the pseudonym ‘“‘ Thomas 
Jones.”’ 


1896. 


118. Note on Macrogeomys cherriet (Allen).<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VIII, 
pp. 45-46, pl. i, April 15, 1896. 
Geomys cherriei further described and skull figured (cf. supra, No. 95). 


114. On Mammals collected in Bexar County and Vicinity, Texas, by Mr. H. P. 
Attwater, with Field Notes by the Collector. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
VIII, pp. 47-80, April 22, 1896. 


Annotated list of 53 spp. 


1 Cervus temama Kerr and Mazama tema Rafinesque I have recently rejected as indeterminable, 
accepting instead Cervus sartorii Saussure (cf. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXIV, p. 541, Nov. 2, 
1915). 


MAMMALS. 65 


115. Descriptions of new North American Mammals.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., VIII, 1896, pp. 233-240, pll. x and xi, Nov. 21, 1896. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Rangifer terrenove, p. 233 (= R. terrenove Bangs of 11 days 
earlier date): (2) Reithrodontomys laceyi, p. 235; (8) Perognathus mearnst, p. 237; (4) Peromys- 
cus michiganensis pallescens, p. 238; (5) Vespertilio incautus, p. 239; (6) Vespertilio chrysono- 
tus, p. 340. 


116. List of Mammals collected by Mr. Walter W. Granger, in New Mexico, Utah, 
Wyoming and Nebraska, 1895-96, with Field Notes by the Collector. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, pp. 241-258, Nov. 25, 1896. 
Annotated list of 48 spp. 


117. On Mammals from the Santa Cruz Mountains, California.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., VIII, pp. 263-270, Dec. 4, 1896. 


Annotated list of 16 species, with records of large series of measurement of various species 
of Muride and one shrew. 


117a. North American Shrews. <Science, N.S., II, pp. 411-413, March 13, 1896. 


Review of papers by C. Hart Merriam and Gerrit S. Miller, Jr., published in N. Amer. 
Fauna, No. 10, Dec. 31, 1895. 


1897, 


118. On Mammals from Yucatan, with Descriptions of New Species. <Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., 1X, pp. 1-12, Feb. 23, 1897. With Frank M. Chapman. 


Annotated list of 15 species, with 3 new, as follows: (1) Peromyscus yucatanicus, p. 8; (2) 
Reithrodontomys mexicanus gracilis, p.9; (3) Heteromys gaumert, p. 9. 


119. On a Second Collection of Mammals from the Island of Trinidad, with de- 
scriptions of New Species, and a Note on some Mammals from the Island 
of Dominica, W. I.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, pp. 18-30, Feb. 26, 
1897. With Frank M. Chapman. 
The annotated list of Trinidad species numbers 40, with the following new: (1) Artibeus 
palmarum, p. 16; (2) Oryzomys delicatus, p. 19; (3) Akodon urichi, p. 19; (4) Akodon frus- 
trator, p. 20: (5) Thylamys carri, p. 27. 
Five species recorded from Dominica. 


120. Additional Notes on Costa Rica Mammals, with Descriptions of New Species. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1X, pp. 31-43, pl. i, March 11, 1897. 


Annotated list of 66 species, with 2 new genera and 4 new species, as follows: Genn. nov.: 
Zygodontomys, p. 38; Sigmodontomys, p. 38. Spp. nov.: (1) Artibeus intermedius, p. 33; (2) 
Oryzomys chrysomelas, p. 37; (3) Sigmodontomys alfari, p. 39; (4) Sigmodon boruce, p. 40. 


121. Further Notes on Mammals Collected in Mexico by Dr. Audley C. Buller, 
with Descriptions of New Species.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., TX, pp. 
47-58, March 15, 1897. 


An annotated list of 35 species, with the following as new: (1) Peromyscus spicilegus, 
p. 50; (2) Peromyscus banderanus, p. 51; (8) Oryzomys merxicanus, p. 52; (4) Oryzomys 
bulleri, p. 53; (5) Sigmodon mascotensis, p. 54; (6) Sigmodon colime, 55; (7) Heteromys hispi- 
dus, p. 56. 


122. Preliminary Description of a new Mountain Sheep from the British North- 
west Territory. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., [X, pp. 111-114, pll. ii and iii, 
April 8, 1897. 


Ovis stonei, sp. nov. 


66 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


123. On a Small Collection of Mammals from Peru, with Descriptions of New 
Species. <<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, pp. 115-119, April 26, 1897. 


Spp. 12, with 3 new: (1) Sciurus (Microsciurus) peruanus, p. 115; (2) Oryzomys baroni, 
p. 118; Sigmodon peruanus, p. 118. 


124. Description of a new species of Sigmodon, from Bogota, Colombia. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., [X, pp. 121-122, May 24, 1897. 


Sigmodon bogotensis, sp. nov. 


125. On a Collection of Mammals from Jalapa and Las Vigas, State of Vera Cruz, 
Mexico. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, pp. 197-208, June 16, 1897. 
With Frank M. Chapman. 


Annotated list of 19 species with 7 new: (1) Mus musculus jalapz, p. 198; (2) Reithro- 
dontomys rafescens, p. 199; (3) Reithrodontomys saturatus, p. 201; (4) Peromyscus furvus, 
p. 201; (5) Peromyscus melanotis, p. 203; (6) Peromyscus musculus brunneus, p. 203; (7) 
Oryzomys jalape, p. 206. 


126. Description of a new Vespertilionine Bat from Yucatan. <Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., IX, pp. 231-232, Sept. 28, 1897. 


Adelonycteris gaumert, sp. nov. 


1898. 


127. Descriptions of new Mammals from Western Mexico and Lower California. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X, pp. 148-158, April 12, 1898. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Marmosa sinalox, p. 143; (2) Lepus peninsularis, p. 144; (8) 
Lepus cerrosensis, p. 145; (4) Lepus arizone confinis, p. 146; (5) Thomomys fulvus anite, 
p. 146; (6) Thomomys fulvus martirensis, p. 147; (7) Thomomys atrovarius, p. 148; (8) Perog- 
nathus perniz, p. 149; (9) Neotoma sinalox, p. 149; (10) Neotoma arenacea, p. 150; (11) 
Neotoma anthonyi, p. 151; (12) Peromyscus eremicus propinquus, p. 154; (13) Peromyscus 
cedrosensis, p. 154; (14) Peromyscus cineritius, p. 155; (15) Peromyscus geronimensis, p. 156; 
(16) Peromyscus exiguus, p. 157; (17) Peromyscus dubius, p. 157. 

Neotoma bryanti Merriam redescribed from a series of good specimens, pp. 152-153. 


128. Revision of the Chickarees, or North American Red Squirrels (subgenus 
Tamiasciurus).<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X, pp. 249-298, August 31, 


1898. 


Monographic revision. Subspp. nov.: (1) Sciurus hudsonicus baileyi, p. 261; (2) Sciurus 
hudsonicus ventorum, p. 263; (3) Sciurus hudsonicus streatori, p. 267; (4) Sciurus douglasii 
cascadensis, p. 277; (5) Sciurus fremonti neomexicanus, p. 291. 

Sciurus douglasii mollipilosus Aud. & Bachm. revived to replace Sciurus hudsonicus orarius 
Bangs, 1897, p. 277. 


129. Nomenclatorial Notes on certain North American Mammals. <Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., X, pp. 449-461, Nov. 10, 1898. 


Sciurus rubricatus Ord (1818), Sciurus botte Lesson (1831), names of too doubtful signifi- 
cance to be employed; Sciurus californicus Lesson (1847), of doubtful application, but renders 
Sciurus hudsonicus californicus Allen (1890) untenable, which is here replaced by Sciurus 
douglasii albolimbatus (nom. nov.), p. 453; Sciurus griseus Ord (1818) antedates Sciurus 
fossor Peale (1848) for the same species; Spermophilus empetra (Pallas, 1778) is again affirmed 
to = S. parryi Richardson; Arctomys lewsii Aud. & Bach. (1853), an earlier name for Cynomys 
leucurus Merriam (1890); Glis canadensis Erxleben (1777) = Arctomys monaxr melanopus 
Kuhl (1820); Arctomys pruinosus Gmelin (1788) = A. caligatus Eschscholtz (1829); Hy- 
pudzus ochrogaster Wagner (1843) = Microtus austerus LeConte (1853); Lutra canadensis 


130. 


131. 


132. 


133. 


134. 


135. 


136. 


137. 


138. 


MAMMALS. 67 


Schreber, 1776) the correct name of the common Otter of North America (vs. Rhoads); 
Mustela pennanti Erxleben (1777) the correct name for the Fisher (vs. Rhoads). 

Sciurus wagneri nom. nov. for Sciurus albipes et S. varius Wagner, preoccupied (= Sciurus 
poliopus Fitzinger). 


A Pocket Mouse in Confinement. < Amer. Nat., XX XII, pp. 583-584, August, 
1898. 
A specimen of Perognathus mearnsi lived in a cage at the American Museum of Natural 


History for about four years in good health without partaking of water, though water was 
offered it, showing that water was not necessary to its welfare. 


The Sea Otter.< Amer. Nat., XXXII, pp. 356-358, May, 1898. 


On their greatly reduced numbers, based on a report to U. S. Government by Capt. 
V. L. Hooper, Commanding Bering Sea Patrol Fleet, 1897. (Treas. Dept. Rep., Dec. 
1897.) 


The Mammals of Florida.< Amer. Nat., XX XIII, pp. 433-436, June, 1898. 


Review of Outram Bangs’s paper ‘The Land Mammals of Peninsular Florida and the 
Coast Region of Georgia’ (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, 1898). 


1399. 


Trouessart’s Catalogue of Mammals.<Amer. Nat., XXXIII, pp. 69-70, 
Jan., 1899. 


Review of second edition of Trouessart’s ‘Catalogus Mammalium tam Viventium quam 
Fossilium,’ 1897. 


Generic and Family Names of Rodents.<Amer. Nat., XX XIII, pp. 70-72, 
Jan., 1899. 
Review of Thomas’s ‘On the Genera of Rodents’ (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1896, pp. 1012- 


1018) and Palmer’s ‘A List of the Generic Names of Rodents’ (Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 
XI, pp. 241-270, Dec. 7, 1897). 


The Fossil Bisons of North America.<Amer. Nat., XX XIII, pp. 665-666, 
August, 1899. 


Review of Lucas’s paper (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXI, pp. 755, 771, pls. lxv-lxxxiv, and 
text figures). 


‘Wild Animals I have Known.’<Amer. Nat., X XXIII, pp. 666-668, August, 
1899. 


Review of E. S. Thompson’s book thus entitled (New York, 1898). 


The North American Arboreal Squirrels.<Amer. Nat., XXXIII, August, 
1899, pp. 635-642. 


A review of E. W. Nelson’s ‘Revision of the Squirrels of Mexico and Central America’ 
(Proc. Washington Acad. Sct., I, pp. 15-110, pli. i and ii, May, 1899), to which is here added 
a list of the ‘Arboreal Squirrels found in North America north of Mexico,’ with their geo- 
graphic ranges. 


Report of the Fur Seal Investigations, 1896-1897.<Science, N. S., X, pp. 
885-890, Dec. 15, 1899. 


Review of ‘The Fur Seals and Fur Seal Islands of the North Pacific,’ by David Starr 
Jordan, Commissioner in Charge of Fur Seal Investigations, 1896-1897. 


68 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


139. On Mammals from the Northwest Territory collected by Mr. A. J. Stone. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XII, pp. 1-9, March 4, 1899. 


Annotated list of 17 species, the following new: (1) Zapus saltators p. 3; (2) Phenacomys 
constablei, p. 4; (8) Microtus stonei, p. 5; (4) Microtus vellerosus, p. 7; (5) Microtus cautus, 
p. 7. Also note on Evotomys fuscodorsalis Allen = E. gapperi (Vigors). 


140. Descriptions of new North American Rodents. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XII, pp. 11-17, March 4, 1899. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Lepus americanus phexonotus, p. 11; (2) Lepus bishopi, p. 11; 
(3) Lepus floridanus chapmani, p. 13; (4) Thomomys fulvus alticolus, p. 13; (5) Reithro- 
dontomys tenuis, p. 15; (6) Peromyscus texanus subarcticus, p. 15; (7) Sciurus chapmani, 
p. 16. 


141. New Rodents from Colombia and Venezuela.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XII, pp. 195-218, Dec. 20, 1899. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Lepus (Sylvilagus) superciliaris, p. 196; (2) Isothriz rufodorsalis, 
p. 197; (3) Echimys mince, p. 199; (4) Echimys urichi, p. 199; (5) Echimys canicollis, p. 200; 
(6) Heteromys jesupi, p. 201; (7) Akodon venezuelensis, p. 203; (8) Akodon columbianus, p. 
203; (9) Oryzomys maculiventer, p. 204; (10) Oryzomys trichurus, p. 206; (11) Oryzomys 
sanctemarte, p. 207; (12) Oryzomys mollipilosus, p. 208; (13) Oryzomys magdalenz, p. 209; 
(14) Oryzomys villosus, p. 210; (15) Oryzomys palmarius, p. 210; (16) Oryzomys tenuicauda, 
p. 211; (17) Oryzomys modestus, p. 212; (18) Oryzomys fulviventer, p. 212; (19) Sciurus 
saltuensis bond, p. 213; (20) Sciurus (Guerlinguetus) quebradensis, p. 217. 


142. The Generic Names Echimys and Loncheres.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XII, pp. 257-264, Dec. 26, 1899. 


On Echimys, Loncheres, Dactylomys, Nelomys and Mesomys. Loncheres = Echimys of 
earlier date; Proechimys gen. nov., to replace Echimys auct., not of F. Cuvier, 1809. 


1900. 


143. The Mountain Caribou of Northern British Columbia. < Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XIII, 1900, pp. 1-18, fig. 1-18, April 3, 1900. 


pean with other forms; referred to Rangifer montanus Seton-Thompson, but later 
(see below, No. 179) became Rangifer osborni Allen. Skull and antlers figured. 


144. Note on the Wood Bison. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, 1900, pp. 638- 
67, April 16, 1900. 


Its range, former and present, and approximate present number of individuals living. 


145. List of Bats collected by Mr. H. H. Smith in the Santa Marta region of Co- 
lombia, with descriptions of new species.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XIII, pp. 87-94, May 12, 1900. 


Annotated list of 22 species, the following new: (1) Chiroderma jesupi, p. 88; (2) Micros 
nycteris hypoleuca, p. 90; (3) Promops affinis, p. 91; (4) Promops milleri, p. 92. 


146. Note on the Generic Names Didelphis and Philander.<Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XII, pp. 185-190, Oct. 12, 1900. 


Philander considered a synonym of Didelphis. Caluromys nom. nov. is proposed for 
Philander auct., with Didelphis philander designated as type.1_ Caluromys alstoni sp. nov., p. 189. 


1 Later, under the action of the principle of tautonymy, Philander became reinstated, leaving 
Caluromys a pure synonym of Philander. 


se 


— a a 2 oe 


— i. 


j 


MAMMALS. 69 


147. Descriptions of new American Marsupials.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XIII, 1900, pp. 191-199, Oct. 23, 1900. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Didelphis pernigra, p. 191; (2) Didelphis karkinophaga cauce, 
p. 192; (3) Didelphis karkinophaga colombica, p. 193; (4) Metachirus fuscogriseus, p. 194; 
(5) Metachirus tschudii, p. 195; (6) Metachirus nudicaudatus colombianus, p. 196; (7) Mar- 
mosa chapmani, p. 197; (8) Marmosa klagesi, p. 198; (9) Thylamys keaysi, p. 198. 


148. On Mammals collected in Southeastern Peru by H. H. Keays, with Descrip- 
tions of new species.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, pp. 219-227, 
Nov. 16, 1900. 


Eighteen species, 5 new, as follows: (1) Dactylomys peruanus, p. 220; (2) Oxymycterus 
jJuliace, p. 223; (3) Oxymycterus apicalis. p. 224; (4) Oryzomys keaysi, p. 225; (5) Oryzomys 
obtusirostris, p. 226. 


149. Some Results of a Natural History Journey to Northern British Columbia, 
Alaska and the Northwest Territory, in the interest of the American Museum 
of Natural History. By A. J. Stone.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, 
pp. 31-62, April 6, 1900. 
Introductory Note and technical names by J. A. Allen. 


150. The systematic name of the Cuban Red Bat.<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 
XIII, 165, Oct. 31, 1900. 


Lasiurus pfeiffert (Gundlach) — not L. blossevillit = L. bonariensis (Lesson & Garnot). 


151. The proper name of the Viscacha.<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XIII, 183, 
Nov. 30, 1900. 


Vizcacia viscacia (Molina). 


152. The North American Jumping Mice.<Amer. Nat., XXXIV, pp. 199-202, 
March, 1900. 


Review of E. A. Preble’s ‘ Revision of the Jumping Mice of the Genus Zapus,’ in N. Amer. 
Fauna, No. 15, 1899, with a list of the species and subspecies, giving their ranges. 


153. Preliminary List of the Mammals of New York.<Amer. Nat., XXXIV, pp. 
316-318, April, 1900. 
Review of G. S. Miller’s ‘Preliminary List of New York Mammals,’ in Bull. New York 
State Mus., VI, 1899, pp. 271-390. 


(901: 


154. The generic names Myrmecophaga and Tamandua, and the specific names of 
the Opossums of the genus Didelphis.<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XIV, 
pp. 91-93, June 19, 1901. 


Myrmecophaga tridactyla Linn.; Tamanduas F. Cuvier (1829) has priority over Uroleptes 
Wagler (1830); Didelphis marsupialis Linn. restricted to the Guiana form of the genus. 


155. The proper generic names of the Viscacha, Chinchillas and their allies. 
<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XIV, 181-182, Dec. 12, 1901. 


Respectively Viscacia Schinz (1825), Chinchilla and Lagidium; Callomys is indeterminable. 


156. Descriptions of two new species of South American Muride.< Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, pp. 39-40, Jan. 31, 1901. 


Spp. nov., (1) Zygodontomys thomasi, p. 39; (2) Sigmodon simonsi, p. 40. 


70 


157. 


158. 


159. 


160. 


161. 


162. 


163. 


164. 


165. 


166. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


On a Further Collection of Mammals from Southeastern Peru, collected by 
Mr. H. H. Keays, with Descriptions of new species. <Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XIV, pp. 41-46, Jan. 31, 1901. 


An annotated list of 18 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Rhipidomys ochrogaster, p. 43; (2) 
Phyllotis osile, p. 44; (3) Akodon lutescens, p. 46. 


The Musk-oxen of Arctic America and Greenland. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XIV, pp. 69-86, pll. xiii-xvii, and 7 text figures, March 27, 1901. 


Principally on the Ellesmere Land form, here referred to Ovibos wardi Lydekker (= O. 
pearyt Allen, Ms.). 


Description of a new Caribou from Kenai Peninsula Alaska. < Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, pp. 143-148, and 4 text figures, May 28, 1901. 


Rangifer stonei sp. nov. 


A Preliminary Study of the North American Opossums of the Genus Didelphis. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, pp. 149-188, pll. xxii-xxv, June 15, 
1901. 


Spp. and subspp. nov.: (1) Didelphis marsupialis texensis, p. 172; (2) Didelphis marsu- 
pialis tabascensis, p. 173; (3) Didelphis richmondi, p. 175; (4) Didelphis yucatanensis, p. 178. 


Descriptions of two new Opossums of the Genus Metachirus.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, pp. 213-218, July 3, 1901. 


Spp. nov.: (1) Metachirus fuscogriseus pallidus, p. 215; (2) Metachirus grisescens, p. 217. 


The generic names of the Mephitine.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, 
pp. 825-334, Nov. 12, 1901. 


Chinca Lesson (1842) a synonym of Mephtis Cuvier (1800); Spilogale Gray (1865) is not 
a synonym of Mephitis, as construed by Howell (IV. Amer. Fauna, No. 20, Aug. 31, 1901). 
A list of the species and subspecies of Mephitis is given (pp. 333, 334). 


New South American Muride and a new Metachirus. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XIV, pp. 405-412, Nov. 30, 1901. 


Spp. nov.: (1) Oryzomys bolivaris, p. 405; (2) Oryzomys castaneus, p. 406; (3) Oryzomys 
perenensis, p. 406; (4) Oryzomys rivularis, p. 407; (5) Phyllotis chacoensis, p. 408; (6) Phyl- 
lotis cachinus, p. 409; (7) Eligmodontia morgani, p. 409; (8) Akodon tucumanensis, p. 410; 
(9) Metachirus nudicaudatus bolivianus, p. 411. 


Mammals of South Africa. <Science, N.8., XIII, pp. 105-106, Jan. 18, 1901. 


Review of Volume I of W. L. Sclater’s work of this title. 


Miller’s Key to the Land Mammals of Eastern North America. < Amer. Nat., 
XXXV, pp. 59-61, Jan., 1901. 


Review of G. S. Miller’s paper thus entitled, with criticism of certain points of nomen- 
clature, as the use of Rosmarus in place of the earlier Odobenus, etc. 


Two Important Papers on North American Mammals.<Amer. Nat., XXXV, 
pp. 221-224, March, 1901. 


Bailey’s ‘Revision of American Voles of the Genus Microtus,’ and Osgood’s ‘ Revision of 
the Pocket Mice of the Genus Perognathus.’ 


ee ee ee ee ee ee ee, ee ee ee 


167. 


168. 


169. 


170. 


Lf 


172. 


173. 


174. 


175. 


176. 


MAMMALS. 71 


1902. 


Beddard’s ‘Mammalia.’< Amer. Nat., XXXVI, pp. 911-914, Nov., 1902. 
Review of this excellent manual (Cambridge Natural History, Vol. X, London, 1902). 


Note on the Names of a few South American Mammals. <Proc. Biol. Soc. 
Washington, XIV, pp. 183-185, Dec. 12, 1901. 


Several species names date from G. Fischer, 1814, which are usually attributed to later 
authors; several names attributed to Wied were first published by Schinz (1821), or by Kuhl, 
or by Temminck; Gray’s names (1827) for certain genera of bats antedate later names now 
current, etc. 


A Further Note on the Generic Names of the Mephitine.< Proc. Biol. Soc. 
Washington, XV, pp. 59-60, March 22, 1902. 


Apropos of Howell’s replacing Mephitis by Chincha and Spilogale by Mephitis. 


A Further Note on the Name of the Argentine Viscacha.<Proc. Biol. Soc. 
Washington, XV, 196, Oct. 10, 1902. 


Viscaccia dates from Oken, 1816, instead of from Schinz, 1825; the specific name chilensis 
Oken (1816) has priority over marimus Desmarest (1817) — hence Viscaccia chilensis Oken 
for the Argentine Viscacha. 


North American Ruminants. <Amer. Mus. Journal, II, March, 1902, Supple- 
ment (= Guide Leaflet, No. 5), pp. 1-29. 18 half-tone illustrations. 


The Caribou of British Columbia and Alaska. <Outing, 1902, pp. 555-561, 
11 text figures. 


Distribution, characters and habits of Rangifer montanus, R. osborni, R. granti, and R. 
stonet. 


North American Deer. < Amer. Nat., XXXVI, pp. 755-756, Sept., 1902. 
Review of the work entitled ‘The Deer Family,’ by Theodore Roosevelt and others. 


Zimmermann’s ‘Zoologiz Geographics’ and ‘Geographische Geschichte’ con- 
sidered in their relation to Mammalian Nomenclature. <Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 13-22, Feb. 1, 1902. 

Various names in the ‘Geschichte’ (1780) were previously employed in the ‘Geographic’ 
(1777) and thus take an earlier date; others antedate Erxleben (1777) to whom they are 
usually accredited. Dama virginiana Zimm., 1777, is considered tenable for the common 
Virginia Deer. Dama lichtensteini (p. 20) is a new name for Cervus mexicanus Lichtenstein, 
preoccupied by Cervus mexicanus Zimmermann and Gmelin, which is shown to have been 
based mainly on the Prong-horn (Antilocapra americana). 


The Generic and Specific Names of some of the Otarlide.< Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 111-118, March 15, 1902. 


Eumetopias stellert (Lesson, 1828) becomes EF. jubata (Schreber, 1776); the first tenable 
specific name of the Southern Sea Lion is shown to be byronia Blainville (1820); the generic 
name of the northern Fur Seals is shown to be Callotaria Palmer, 1892, not Ofoes Palmer, 
1901 = Otaria Peron, 1816. 


A new Caribou from the Alaska Peninsula.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XVI, pp. 119-127, and 6 text figures, April 7, 1902. 


Rangifer granti, sp. nov. 


2 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


177. A new Bear from the Alaska Peninsula. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, 
pp. 141-148, pll. xxx, and xxxi, April 12, 1902. 


Ursus merriami sp. nov. Skull and dentition figured. 


178. A new Sheep from the Kenai Peninsula.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, 
pp. 145-148, and 2 text figures, April 23, 1902. 


Ovis dalli kenaiensis subsp. nov. 


179. Description of a new Caribou from Northern British Columbia, and remarks 
on Rangifer montanus.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 149-158, 
and 6 text figures. April 16, 1902. 


Rangifer osborni, sp. nov.; skulls of true Rangifer montanus figured. 


180. Nomenclatorial Notes on American Mammals. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XVI, pp. 159-168, July 1, 1902. 
Alce Blumenbach (1803 [lege 1799]) replaces Megaceros Owen (1844) for the extinct Irish 
Elk. Alce (non Blumenbach, Alces auct.) is changed to Paralces, nom. nov., p. 160. Dama 
vs. Odocoileus is again considered, anent comment on the case by Osgood. The names of the 
Peccaries, both generic and specific, are discussed, and a list of the species with their synonymy 
is given, the specific name pecari Fisher (1814) replacing albirostris Iliger (1815) and also 
labiatus Cuvier (1817). Sciurus rufiventer E. Geoffroy (1803) is adopted in place of S. ludo- 
vicianus Custis (1806). 


181, List of Mammals collected in Alaska by the Andrew J. Stone Expedition of | 
1901.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 215-230, July 12, 1902. 


An annotated list of 26 species, with field notes by J. D. Figgins, collector. 


182. A Preliminary Study of the South American Opossums of the Genus Didel- . 
phis.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 249-279, Aug. 18, 1902. , 

A monographic revision, with copious tables of measurements. Subspp. nov.: (1) 

Didelphis marsupialis insularis, p. 259; (2) D. m. etensis, p. 262; (3) D. paraguayensis 


andina, p. 272; (4) D. p. meridensis, p. 274. D. paraguayensis Oken (1816) replaces 
D. aurita Temminck (1825). 


183. Mammal Names proposed by Oken in his ‘Lehrbuch der Zoologie.’ < Bull, 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 373-379, Oct. 11, 1902. . 
Generic names considered available are Citellus, Grison, Tayra, Thos, Panthera, Tigris, 
Leo. The specific names considered available, or as rendering invalid later similar names, 
are Lepus chilensis, for the Argentine Viscacha; Hysiriz paraguayensis, for Spiggurus spinosa 
F. Cuvier; Felis (Lynx) brasiliensis, unidentifiable with certainty, but precludes a later 
Felis brasiliensis (as of Schinz and F. Cuvier); Felis (Panthera) mexicana = Felis mexicana 
Desm. of even date. 


184. A new Caribou from Ellesmere Land.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, 
pp. 409-412, with 2 text figures, Oct. 31, 1902. 


Rangifer pearyi sp. nov. 


185. The Hair Seals (Family Phocidz) of the North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 459-499, with 10 text figures, 
Dec. 12, 1902. 


Nomenclature; sexual differences in dentition; revision of the North Pacific species 
(11 species and subspecies are recognized), the following new: (1) Phoca hispida gichigensis, 
p. 488; (2) Phoca ochotensis macrodens, p. 483; (3) Phoca stejnegeri, p. 485; (4) Phoca rich- 
ardii pribilofensis; (5) Phoca richardii geronimensis, p. 495. 

Phoca nigra Pallas (p. 483 footnote) suggested as apparently available for Callorhinus 
curilensis (see infra, No. 192). 


MAMMALS. (iB. 


1903. 


186. Description of a new species of Sigmodon from Ecuador. < Bull. Amer, Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XIX, pp. 99-100, March 20, 1903. 


Sigmodon puna sp. nov. 


187. Report on the Mammals Collected in Northeastern Siberia by the Jesup North 
Pacific Expedition, with Itinerary and Field Notes by N. G. Buxton. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, pp. 101-184, 195, 196, May 9, 1903. 


Descriptive, critical, and field notes on 35 species, the following new: (1) Citellus buztoni, 
p. 139; (2) Citellus stejnegeri, p. 142; (3) Evotomys (Craseomys) latastei, p. 145; (4) Evotomys: 
Jochelsoni, p. 148; (5) Lemmus obensis chrysogaster, p. 153; (6) Ochotona kolymensis, p. 154; 
(7) Lepus gichiganus, p. 155; (8) Vulpes anadyrensis, p. 167; (9) Putorius (Arctogale) pyg- 
meus, p. 176; (10) Erinaceus orientalis, p. 179; (11) Sorex buztoni, p. 181. 


188. Descriptions of new Rodents from Southern Patagonia, with a Note on the 
Genus Huneomys Coues, and an Addendum to Article [swpra, No. 186] on 
Siberian Mammals. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIX, pp. 185-196, May 9, 
1903. 


(1) Ctenomys robustus, p. 185; (2) Clenomys sericeus, p. 187; (3) Ctenomys colburni, p. 188;. 
(4) Oxymycterus microtis, p. 189; (5) Reithrodon cuniculoides obscurus, p. 190, (6) Reithrodon 
hatcheri, p. 191; (7) Euneomys petersoni, p. 192, spp. et subspp. nov. 

Euneomys Coues, a well-founded genus. 


189, Mammals collected in Alaska and Northern British Columbia by the Andrew 
J. Stone Expedition of 1902.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, pp. 521- 
567, text figs. 1-9, Oct. 10, 1903. 


Annotated list of 28 species, the following new: (1) Citellus stonei, p. 537; (2) Synaptomys 
(Mictomys) chapmani, p. 555; (3) Synaptomys (Mictomys) andersoni, p. 554; (4) Erethizon 
epizanthus nigrescens, p. 558; (5) Putorius microtis, p. 563. 

Under the mistaken impression that Alce properly dated from Frisch (1775), thus ante- 
dating Alce Blumenbach (1799) and Alces Gray (1821), Paralces Allen (1902 —cf. supra,. 
No, 180) is here conceded to be untenable, but later investigation renders it evident that 
Frisch’s work in which Alce was proposed is not to be accepted as nomenclaturally authori- 
tative. 


190. List of Mammals collected by J. H. Batty in New Mexico and Durango,. 
with Descriptions of new Species and Subspecies. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XIX, pp. 587-612, Nov. 138, 1903. 


An annotated list of 34 species, the following new: (1) Odocoileus battyi, p. 591; (2) 
Eutamias durange, p. 594; (3) Citellus (Otospermophilus) grammurus rupestris, p. 595; (4) 
Peromyscus paulus, p. 598; (5) Peromyscus texanus flaccidus, p. 599; (6) Sigmodon baileyi, 
p. 601; (7) Reithrodontomys megalotis sestinensis, p. 602; (8) Neotoma intermedia durange, 
p. 602; (9) Perodipus obscurus, p. 603; (10) Lepus (Macrotolagus) terianus micropus, p. 605; 
(11) Lepus (Macrotolagus) gaillardi battyi, p. 607; (12) Lepus (Sylvilagus) durange, p. 6093. 
(13) Canis impavidus, p. 609; (14) Myotis californicus durange, p. 612. 


191. A new Deer and a new Lynx from the State of Sinaloa, Mexico. < Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, pp. 618-615, Nov. 14, 1903. 


(1) Odocoileus sinaloxe, p. 613; (2) Lynx ruffus escuinape, p. 614. 


192. Note on Phoca nigra Pallas.<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XVI, p. 49, March 
19, 1903. 


; ‘ 2 ; ’ 
The name being preoccupied cannot be used in place of Callotaria curilensis Jordan and 
Clark, as previously suggested (see supra, No. 185). 


(ea BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


193. Note on Sciurus mollipilosus Audubon and Bachman. <Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash- 
ington, XVI, p. 126, Sept. 30, 1903, 


Defense of the use of mollipilosus in place of the later orarius Bangs. 


1904. 


194. New forms of the Mountain Goat (Oreamnos).<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XX, pp. 19-21, text fig. 1-18, Feb. 10, 1904. 


(1) Oreamnos montanus columbianus and (2) O. m. missoule (p. 20), sabspp. nov. 


195. Mammals from Southern Mexico and Central and South America. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 29-80, Feb. 29, 1904. 

Annotated lists from Southern Vera Cruz, Mexico, 19 spp.; Central Costa Rica, 23 spp.; 
Chiriqui, Republic of Panama, 53 spp. Partial revisions of the genera Tayra, Nasua, and 
Potos. 

New species and subspecies: (1) Lepus (Sylvilagus) russatus, p. 31; (2) Lepus (Sylvilagus) 
parvulus, p. 34; (3) Tayra barbara irara, p. 36; (4) Akodon irazu, p. 46; (5) Felis carrikeri, 
p. 47; (6) Nasua narica bullata, p. 48; (7) Nasua narica panamensis, p. 51; (8) Nasua narica 
yucatanica, p. 52; (9) Nasua narica pallida, p. 53; (10) Sigmodon boruce chiriquensis, p. 68; 
(11) Felis mearnsi (nom. nov.), p. 71; (12) Felis panamensis, p. 71; (13) Potos flavus chiri- 
quensis, p. 74; (14) Potos flavus caucensis, p. 75; (15) Potos flavus chapadensis, p. 76; (16) 
Myotis chiriquensis, p. 77. 


196. The External Ear Bone in certain Rodents. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, 
pp. 135-188, text fig., April 7, 1904. 


External ear bone in Heteromys, here first described and figured. 


197. Further Notes on Mammals from Northwestern Durango. <Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 205-210, May 28, 1904. 


An annotated list of 17 species, the following new: (1) Sciurus aberti pheurus, p. 205; 
(2) Sciurus aberti barberi, p. 207; (3) Eutamias canescens, p. 208. 


198. New Bats from Tropical America, with note on Species of Otopterus. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 227-237, June 29, 1904. 

Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Molossus coibensis, p. 227; (2) Molossus bondex, p. 228; (8) 

Promops barbatus, p. 228; (4) Dermonotus suapurensis, p. 229; (5) Lonchophylla thomasi, 

p. 230; (6) Artibeus rusbyi, p. 230; (7) Artibeus insularis, p. 231; (8) Artibeus yucatanicus, 

p. 232; (9) Phyllostoma hastatus panamensis, p. 233; (10) Phyllostoma hastatus caure, p. 234. 


Two species of Otopterus in Mexico — O. bocourtianus (Dobson) and O. mexicanus (Saus- 
sure). 


199. Mammals Collected in Alaska by the Andrew J. Stone Expedition of 1903. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 273-292, fig. 1-19, Sept. 8, 1904. 


An annotated list, with many measurements, of 28 species. 


200. A new Sheep from Kamchatka. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 293- 
298, fig. 1-6, Sept. 8, 1904. 


Ovis storcki, sp. nov. 


201. New Mammals from Venezuela and Colombia. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XX, pp. 327-335, Oct. 8, 1904. 

Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Peramys brevicaudatus dorsalis, p. 327; (2) Oryzomys tenuipes, 

p. 328; (3) Akodon meridensis, p. 329; (4) Holochilus venezuelensis, p. 330; (5) Felis maripen- 


sis, p. 331; (6) Felis sanctemarte, p. 332; (7) Procyon proteus, p. 333; (8) Nasua phxocephala, 
p. 334. 


202. 


203. 


204. 


205. 


206. 


207. 


208. 


MAMMALS. 0 


List of Mammals from Venezuela collected by Mr. Samuel M. Klages. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 337-345, Oct. 8, 1904. 


An annotated list of 46 species. 


A Fossil Porcupine from Arizona. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 383- 
384, Oct. 15, 1904. 


Erethizon godfreyi, sp. nov. 


The Tamandua Anteaters.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 385-398, 
fig. 1-4, Oct. 29, 1904. 


A review of the group, with respect to external and cranial characters. Subspp. nov.: 
(1) Tamandua tetradactyla chapadensis, p. 392; (2) T. t. instabilis, p. 392; (3) T. t. tenui- 
rostris, p. 394; (4) T. t. chiriquensis, p. 395, 


Report on Mammals from the District of Santa Marta, Colombia, collected 
by Mr. Herbert H. Smith, with Field Notes by Mr. Smith.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 407-468, fig. 1-4, Nov. 28, 1904. 


An annotated list of 78 species, the following new: (1) Coendou sanctemarte, p. 441; (2) 
Lutra colombiana, p. 452; (3) Alouatta seniculus rubicunda, p. 458; (4) Alouatta seniculus 
caucensis, p. 462. 

Urocyon aquilus Bangs not referable to Urocyon. 


Palmer’s ‘Index Generum Mammalium.’ <Science, N. 8., XIX, pp. 498-501, 
March 25, 1904. 


A review of this notable work (V. Amer. Fauna, No. 23, Jan. 1904.) 


1905. 


Mammalia of Southern Patagonia. Reports of the Princeton University 
Expeditions to Patagonia, 1896-1899, Vol. III, 1905, Part I, pp. 1-120, pll. 
1—XXIx. 

Detailed treatment of 55 species, with special reference to nomenclature, that of the genera 
as well as the species discussed historically; full tables of references under the genera and 
species, and an annotated bibliography (pp. 192-210) of 65 titles. 

Eunothocyon, gen. nov., p. 153 (in text); Carcinocyon, gen. nov., p. 153 (in text; Ctenomys 
osgoodi, nom. novy., to replace C. robustus Allen, preoccupied, p. 191; Canis sclateri nom. nov. 
(p. 153) to replace Canis microtis Sclater, preoccupied. 

Species figured: Zaedyus ciliatus, pll. i-iii (animal, skeleton, and three skulls); Kerodon 
australis and Ctenomys osgoodi, pl. vii (skulls); Ctenomys sericeus and C. colburni, pl. viii 
(skulls); Eligmodontia, Oryzomys and Oxrymycterus, pli. ix and x (skulls and dentition of 
various species); Akodon, pll. xi and xii (skulls and dentition of 6 species); Phyllotis, Eu- 
neomys, and Reithrodon, pll. xiii and xiv (skulls and dentition); Arctocephalus australis and 
A. philippit, pll. xv—xvii (skulls, three views of each); Arctocephalus townsendt pil. xviii-—xx 
(skull, three views); Otaria byronia, pl. xxi (skeleton); Conepatus humboldti, pl. xxii (skulls 
and dentition); Cerdocyon griseus, pl. xxiii (skull, three views); Lynchailurus pajeros crucina, 
pl. xxiv (skull and dentition); Puma pearsoni, pll. xxv and xxvi (colored figures of animal, 
red and gray phases); Puma pearsoni, pil. xxvii-xxix (three views of skull). 


The Andrew J. Stone Explorations in Arctic and Subarctic America. 4to, 
pp. i-xvi, 1-38, with 55 half-tone illustrations in text. American Museum 
of Natural History, 1905. Edition limited to 100 numbered copies. (Anony- 
mous.) 


The illustrations, from photographs, relate mostly to mammals, as does the greater part 
of the text. 


76 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


209. Mammals from Beaver County, Utah, collected by the [Brooklyn Institute] 


Museum Expedition of 1904.<Science Bulletin Mus. Brooklyn Inst. Arts 


and Sciences, I, No. 6, pp. 117-122, March 31, 1905. 


Annotated list of 16 species, the following new: (1) Eutamias lectus, p. 117; (2) Eutamias 
adsitus, p. 118; (3) Cynomys parvidens, p. 119; (4) Marmota engelhardti, p. 120; (5) Ochotona 
cinnamomea, p. 121. 


1906. 


210. Mammals from the States of Sinaloa and Jalisco, Mexico, collected by J. H. 


211. 


212. 


213. 


214. 


215. 


216. 


Batty during 1904 and 1905.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXII, pp. 
191-262, pll. xx—xxxiii, and 3 text figures, July 25, 1906. 


I. Mammals from Southern Sinaloa, pp. 192-237, 41 species; II. Mammals from the 
State of Jalisco, pp. 237-262, 60 species. Extended field notes, much critical comment, andi 
many measurements, in text or tabulated. The deer, peccaries, and nasuas treated at length, 
with illustrations, in the case of Nasua with relation to sex and age; pathological conditions: 
in skulls of Tayassu treated at length. 

Spp. et subspp noy.: (1) Heteromys pictus escuinape, p. 211; (2) Molossus sinaloex, p- 
236; (3) Sciurus poliopus tepicanus, p. 243; (3) Sigmodon vulcani, p. 247; (4) Heteromys: 
Jaliscensis, p. 251. 


Mammals from the Island of Hainan, China.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXII, pp. 463-490, pl. xix, Dec. 17, 1906. 


An annotated list of 41 species, the following new: (1) Manis pusilla, p. 465; (2) Atherurus 
hainanus, p. 470; (3) Ratufa gigantea hainana, p. 472; (4) Funambulus rindonensis, p. 472; 
(5) Sciurus erythreus insularis, p. 473; (6) Tamiops (gen. nov.) macclellandi hainanus, p. 476; 
(7) Tamiops macclellandi riudoni, p. 477; (8) Tupaia modesta, p. 481; (9) Rhinolophus 
hainanus, p. 482; (10) Hipposideros poutensis, p. 483; (11) Scotophilus kuhlit insularis, 
p. 485; (12) Scotophilus castaneus consobrinus, p. 485; (13) Pipistrellus portensis, p. 487. 


The proper name of the Mexican Tamandua. < Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 
XIX, p. 200, Dec. 31, 1906. 


The specific name mezicanus Saussure, 1860, should replace tenuirostris Allen, 1904. 


Vertebrata of the Land; Birds and Mammals. <Science, N. S., XXIII, pp- 
317-319, Feb. 28, 1906. 


In report of a discussion before the American Society of Naturalists at Philadelphia, Dec. 
27, 1895, on ‘The Origin and Relations of the Floras and Faunas of the Antarctic and Adja- 
cent Regions.’ 


1907. 


The Families and Genera of Bats.< Amer. Nat., XLI, pp. 671-672, Oct. 1907. 


Review of Gerrit S. Miller’s work of this title (Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 57, June 29,. 
1907). 


1908. 


The North Atlantic Right Whale and its near Allies. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XXIV, pp. 277-329, pll. xix—xxiv, and 1 text figure, April 8, 1908. 


History, relationships, nomenclature, geographical distribution, and external and osteo- 
logical characters of Hubalena glacialis (Bonnaterre). 


The Peary Caribou (Rangifer pearyi Allen).<Bull.. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXIV, pp. 487-493, fig. 1-12, May 22, 1908. 


Detailed description, with measurements and figures of skulls and antlers, and compari- 
son with allied forms. 


MAMMALS. Ap 


217. Notes on Solenodon paradoxurus Brandt. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, 


pp. 305-517, pll. xxvili-xxxiii, and fig. 1-9, June 8, 1908. 


External and cranial characters described and figured, including a young skull with milk 
dentition, and comparison with S. cubanus. 


218. Mammalogical Notes.—I-VI.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, pp. 


575-589, fig. 1-4, Sept. 11, 1908. 

(1) Concrescence in premolars of a bat (Artibeus quadrivittatus); (2) bats from the Island 
of San Domingo (Ardops haitiensis and Molossus verrilli, spp. nov., p. 581); (3) note on the 
type of the genus Sciuropterus; (4) note on the type locality of Rangifer arctica (Richardson) ; 
(5) northward extension of range of Coyotes; (6) the generic name Galera Browne. 


219. Mammals from Nicaragua. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, pp. 647-670, 


220. 


221. 


222. 


223. 


224. 


225. 


text figs, 1-12, Oct. 13, 1908. 


Annotated list of 59 species. Gen. nov., Hoplomys, p. 649; spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) 
Lepus gabbi tumacus, p. 649; (2) Hoplomys truei, p. 650; (8) Heteromys vulcani, p. 652; (4) 
Heteromys fuscatus, p. 652; (5) Neotoma chrysomelas, p. 653; (6) Oryzomys alfaroi incertus, 
p. 655; (7) Oryzomys ochraceus, p. 655; (8) Oryzomys carrikeri, p. 656; (9) Sigmodon hispidus 
griseus, p. 657; (10) Ototylomys fumeus, p. 658; (11) Peromyscus nicarague, p. 658; (12) 
Sciurus deppei matagalpe, p. 660; (13) Lutra latidens, p. 660; (14) Tayra barbara inserta, 
p. 662; (15) Bassaricyon richardsoni, p. 662; (16) Blarina olivaceus, p. 669; (17) Artibeus 
jamaicensis richardsoni, p. 669; (18) Alouatta palliata matagalpe, p. 670. 


1909. 


Mammals from British East Africa, collected by the Tjador Expedition of 


1906.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, pp. 147-175, fig. 1-10, March 
19, 1901. 


Annotated list of 56 species. Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Tragelaphus tjaderi, p. 148; (2) 
Madoqua langi, p. 153; (3) Arvicanthis nairobe, p. 168; (4) Mus kijabius, p. 169; (5) Crocidura 
kyabe, p. 1738. 


The White Bear of Southwestern British Columbia < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 


Hist., XXVI, pp. 233-238, figs. 1-4, April 17, 1909. 


External and cranial characters of Ursus kermodei Hornaday. 


Further Notes on Mammals from the Island of Hainan, China. < Bull. Amer. 


Mus. Nat. Hist., X XVI, pp. 239-242, April 17, 1909. 


Notes on 13 species, 2 new for the island. (1) Paradorurus (Paguma) larvatus hainanus 
and (2) Mungos rubrifrons, p. 240, sp. et subsp. nov. 


Mammals from Shen-si Province, China. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVI, 


pp. 425-430, Oct. 21, 1909. 


Annotated list of 15 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Myotalpa rufescens, p. 428; (2) Sciurolamias 
owstoni, p. 428; (3) Hutamias albogularis, p. 429. 


Osgood’s Revision of the Mice of the Genus Peromyscus. << Amer. Nat., XLII, 


pp. 633-639, Oct., 1909. 
Review of W. H. Osgood’s paper of this title (N. Amer. Fauna, No. 28, April 17, 1909), 
in part historical of the subject. 


‘Life Histories of Northern Animals.’ <Science, N. 8., XXX, No. 782, pp. 


3 
924-927, Dec. 24, 1999. 
Review of Ernest Thompson Seton’s work of this title, 2 vols, roy. 8vo., New York, 
Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909. 


18 


226. 


227. 


bo 
iw) 
oo 


229. 


230. 


231. 


232. 


233. 


234. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1910. 


The Black Bear of Labrador.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, pp. 
1-6, Jan. 5, 1910. 


Ursus americanus sornborgeri Bangs, not tenable. Ursus americanus kenaiensis (p. 6), 
subsp. nov. 


Mammals from the Athabasca-Mackenzie Region of Canada.<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, pp. 7-11, Jan. 5, 1910. 


Annotated list of 25 species. 


Mammals from Palawan Island, Philippine Islands. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XXXVI, pp: 13-17, Jan.-5, 1910; 


Annotated list of 13 species, the following new: (1) Mus luteiventris, p. 14; (2) Arctictis 
whitei, p. 15; (3) Mungos palawanus, p. 17. 


Nelson’s Monograph of the North American Leporide.<Amer. Nat., XLIV, 
pp. 57-63, Jan., 1910. 


Review of ‘The Rabbits of North America,’ by E. W. Nelson (N. Amer. Fauna, No. 29, 
August 31, 1909). Lepus aquaticus littoralis Nelson shown to be a synonym of Lepus aquaticus 
aquaticus. 


Seton’s ‘Life Histories of North American Animals.’<Amer. Nat., XLIV, pp. 
124-127, Feb., 1910. 


Review of Ernest Thompson Seton’s work of this title. 


Additional Mammals from Nicaragua. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, 
pp. 87-115, April 30, 1910. 


Annotated list of 82 species represented by specimens in the American Museum of Natural 
History, and 50 additional species on the basis of previous records. Spp. nov.: (1) Macro- 
geomys matagalpe, p. 97; (2) Oryzomys richardsoni, p. 99; (3) O. nicarague, p. 100; (4) 
Conepatus nicarague, p. 106. Ursus americanus perniger, p. 115, nom. noy. for U. a. 
kenaiensis, preoccupied. 


Mammals from the Caura district of Venezuela, with description of a new 
species of Chrotopterus.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, pp. 145- 
149, May 27, 1910. 


Annotated list of 14 species. Chrotopterus carrikeri (p. 147), sp. nov. 


The Mammals of Colorado. <Science, N. S., XXXII, No. 814, pp. 178-179, 
Aug. 5, 1910. 
Review of Edward Royal Warren’s book of this title (16 mo, New York and London, 1910). 


1911. 


Mammals from Venezuela collected by Mr. M. A. Carriker, Jr., 1909-1911. 
<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXX, p. 289-273, Dec. 2, 1911. 


Annotated list of 66 spp. Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Cavia porcella venezuelx, p. 250; 
(2) Loncheres carrikert, p. 251; (3) Urocyon cinereoargentea venezuele, p. 259; (4) Chilonycteris 
rubiginosa fusca, p. 262. 


Mammals collected in the Dutch East Indies by Mr. Roy C. Andrews, on the 
cruise of the ‘Albatross’ in 1909.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXX, pp. 
335-339, Dec. 21, 1911. 


Annotated list of 16 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Mus andrewsi, p. 336; (2) M. buruensis, 
p. 336; Sciurus beebei, p. 338; (4) Tamiops sauteri, p. 339. 


236. 


237. 


238. 


239. 


240. 


241. 


242. 


243. 


244. 


245. 


MAMMALS. 79 


The Okapi. <Amer. Mus. Journ., XI, No. 2, March, 1911, pp. 73-75. 


A general account of the Okapi with reference to specimens received from the Museum’s 
Congo Expedition. 


The Habitat Groups of Mammals and Birds in the American Museum of 
Natural History.< Amer. Mus. Journ., XI, No. 7, pp. 248-249, Nov. 1911. 


1912: 


Sheldon’s ‘The Wilderness of the Upper Yukon.’ <Science, N. S., XXXV, 
No. 890, pp. 105-106, Jan. 19, 1912. 


Review of Charles Sheldon’s ‘The Wilderness of the Upper Yukon: A Hunter’s Explora- 
tions for Wild Sheep in Sub-Arctic Mountains.’ : 


Historical and Nomenclatorial Notes on North American Sheep. <Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XI, pp. 1-29, text figs. 1-4, March 4, 1912. 


McGillivray’s original account of his discovery of Wild Sheep in Canada in 1800, and copy 
of his original figure (pp. 2-7); E. Geoffroy’s ‘Belier de Montagne’ (p. 8); Ovis cervina 
Demarest and Ovis canadensis Shaw (pp. 9-11); collation of Shaw and Nodder’s ‘ Naturalist’s 
Miscellany,’ with reference to the date of Ovis canadensis Shaw (pp. 11-15); other early 
references to the Mountain Sheep of North America (pp. 15-17); the Taye of ‘‘ California,”’ 
with a copy of Venega’s figure (pp. 17-20); synonymic list of North American Sheep, with 
their type localities and ranges (pp. 22-29). Eleven forms recognized, including Ovis cali- 
fornianus Douglas. 


Mammals from Western Colombia.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXII, 
pp. 71-95, April 19, 1912. 


Annotated list of 55 spp. Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Sylvilagus (Tapeti) fulvescens, p. 75; 
(2) Heteromys lomitensis, p. 77; (3) Reithrodontomys milleri, p. 77; (4) Rhipidomys mollis- 
simus, p. 78; (5) R. similis, p. 79; (6) R. cocalensis, p. 79; (7) Thomasomys cinereiventer, p. 
80; (8) T. popayanus, p. 81; (9) Neacomys pusillus, p. 81; (10) Oryzomys palmire, p. 83; 
(11) O. pectoralis, p. 83; (12) O. (Oligoryzomys) munchiquensis, p. 85; (13) O. (O.) fulvirostris, 
p. 86; (14) O. (Melanomys) obscurior affinis, p. 88; (15) Av’peomys fuscatus, p. 89; (16) 
Microzus affinis, p. 89; (17) Sciurus milleri, p. 91; (18) Blarina (Cryptotis) squamipes, p. 93. 


A new Pika from Colorado. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XI, pp. 103-104, 
Sept. 2, 1912. 1 


Ochotona figginsi, p. 103. 


The probable recent extinction of the Muskox in Alaska.<Science, N.S., 
XXXVI, No. 934, pp. 720-722, Nov. 22, 1912. 


Evidence that Muskoxen lived in Alaska “‘as recently as fifty to sixty years ago.”’ 


Zodlogy of the Stephansson-Anderson [Arctic] Expedition — a preliminary 
Estimate.< Amer. Mus. Journ., XII, p. 237, Nov., 1912. 


Miller’s ‘List of North American Land Mammals in the United States National 
Museum.’ <Science, N.8., XX XVII, No. 951, pp. 4538-454, March 21, 1913. 
Review of the work (Bull. 79, U. S. Nat. Mus., Dec. 31, 1912). 


1913. 


Mammals collected in Korea.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXII, pp. 
427-436, Sept. 2, 1918. (With Roy C. Andrews.) 


Annotated list of 19 spp., with field notes by Mr. Andrews. Spp. nov.: (1) Ochotona 
(Pika) coreanus, p. 429; (2) Meles melanogenys, 433. 


80 


246. 


247. 


248. 


249. 


2 


0. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


New Mammals from Colombia and Ecuador. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXXII, pp. 469-484, text figs. 1-18, Sept. 25, 1913. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Cholepus florenciz, p. 469; (2) C. agustinus, p. 470; (3) C. 
andinus, p. 472; (4) C. capitalis, p. 472; (5) Tayassu niger, p. 476; (6) Sylvilagus (Tapeti) 
salentus, p. 476; (7) Myoprocta milleri, p. 477; (8) Coendu quichua richardsoni, p. 478; (9) 
Proechimys o’connelli, p. 479; (10) Sigmodon chonensis, p. 479; (11) Akodon tolime, p. 480; 
(12) Potos flavus tolimensis, p. 481; (13) Nasua olivacea lagunetz, p. 483; (14) Tayra barbara 
senilis, p. 484. 


Revision of the Melanomys Group of American Muride.<Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., XXXII, p. 535-555, pl. Ixviii, Nov. 17, 1913. 


14 species and subspecies, the following new: (1) Melanomys caliginosus oroensis, p. 538; 
(2) M. affinis monticola, p. 540; (3) M. pheopus vallicola, p. 544; (4) M. pheopus tolimensis, 
p. 545; (5) M. lomitensis, p. 545; (6) M. buenaviste, p. 547. 


New South American Muride.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXII, pp. 
597-604, Dec. 3, 1913. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Oryzomys helvolus, p. 597; (2) O. o’connelli, p. 597; (3) O. 
vincencianus, p. 598; (4) O. incertus, p. 598; (5) Zygodontomys griseus, p. 599; (6) Z. frater- 
culus, p. 599; (7) Akodon chapmani, p. 600; (8) Rhipidomys quindianus, p. 600; (9) R. 
caucensis, p. 601; (10) R. venezuele yuruanus, p. 601; (11) R. milleri, p. 602; (12) Gicomys 
mince, p. 603; (13) G. caicare, p. 603. 


Catalogue of Mammals of Western Europe. <Science, N. S., XX XVIII, No. 
970, pp. 159-162, Aug. 1, 1913. 


Review of Gerrit S. Miller’s work of this title (Svo, British Museum, 1912). 


Ontogenetic and other Variations in Muskoxen, with a systematic Review 
of the Muskox Group, recent and extinct.< Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
New Series, I, Pt. 4, 1918, pp. 101-226, pll. xi—xvii, 1 map, and 45 text figs., 
March, 1913. 


Ontogenesis of the horns, teeth, skull and pelage, pp. 107-143; individual differentiation 
as indicated by the skull, pp. 143-157; systematic review, including historical summary, 
pp. 157-160; geographic distribution, past and present, pp. 160-164; classification and re- 
lationship, 164-171; Ovibos, characters, alleged species and subspecies, pp. 171-179; geo- 
graphic variation, pp. 179-180; synopsis of species and subspecies, pp. 180-182; systematic 
description, habits, and distribution: Ovibos moschatus moschatus, pp. 183-189; O. m. niphe- 
cus, pp. 189-191; O. m. wardi, pp. 191-201; O. yukonensis (extinct), pp. 201-203; O. pallantis 
(extinct), pp. 203-205; extermination, pp. 205-207; Muskoxen in Zodlogical Gardens, pp. 
207-208; Bootherium, pp. 209-213; Symbos, pp. 213-215; Liops, p. 216; bibliography, 
pp. 221-226. 

Plates xi-xv, O. m. wardi as follows: pl. xi, horncores; pl. xii, transverse sections of 
horncores; pl. xiii, longitudinal sections of horncores; pl. xiv, sections of horncores; pl. xv, 
maxillary toothrow at different ages; pl. xvi, mandibular toothrow at different ages. Plates 
xvii and xviii, skull of Symbos cavifrons. 

Text figures 1-26, skulls and dentition of O. m. wardi from foetal age to senescence; text 
fig. 27, map of distribution, present and recent, of Muskoxen in North America and Green- 
land; text figs. 28-31, skulls of O. m. moschatus and O. m. wardi; text figs. 32-36, mounted 
specimens of same; text figs. 38-44, photographs of calves of O. m. wardi in New York Zodlogi- 
cal Park; text fig. 45, type skull of Bootherium bombifrons. 


251. Shall the Walrus become Extinct?<Amer. Mus. Journ., XIII, pp. 38-42, 


Jan., 1913. With illustrations. 


Comment on its unrestricted destruction and need of international restriction for its 
preservation. 


ee a ee ee ee ee 


252. 


253. 


254. 


255. 


256. 


257. 


258. 


258a. 


259. 


MAMMALS. 81 


1914. 


Review of the Genus Microsciurus.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, 
pp. 145-165, Feb. 26, 1914. 


19 species and subspecies recognized. Spp. nov.: (1) Microsciurus rubrirostris, p. 1633 
(2) M. florencix, p. 164. : 


Two new Mammals from Ecuador. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, 
pp. 199-200, Feb. 28, 1914. 
(1) Sylvilagus daulensis, p. 199; (2) Thomasomys aureus altorum, p. 200. 


Mammals from British East Africa, collected on the Third African Expedition 
of the American Museum by William S. Rainsford. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XX XIII, pp. 337-344, June 18, 1914. 


Annotated list of 40 species. 


New South American Bats and a new Octodent.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XX XIII, pp. 381-389, pl. xxviii, July 9, 1914. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Amorphochilus schnablii osgoodi, p. 381; (2) Eptesicus andinus, 
p. 382; (3) Dasypterus ega punensis, p. 382; (4) Myotis ruber keaysi, p. 383; (5) M. punensis, 
p. 383; (6) M. bonde, p. 384; (7) M. maripensis, p. 385; (8) M. esmeralde, p. 385; (9) M. 
caucensis, p. 386; (10) Nyctinomus xquatorialis, p. 386; (11) Mormopterus peruanus, p. 387; 
(12) Thrinacodus apolinari, p. 387, pl. xxxviii, skull, with skull of Dactylomys dactylinus for 
comparison. 


New South American Sciuride.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII,. pp. 
585-597, fig. 1-2, Oct. 8, 1914. 


Notosciurus gen. nov., p. 585; spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) N. rhoadsi, p. 585, text figs. 1-2; 
(2) Guerlinguetus pucheranii salentensis, p. 587; (3) G. hoffmanni quindianus, 587; (4) G. 
hoffmanni manavi, p. 589; (5) G. griseimembra, p. 589; (6) G. candelensis, p. 590; (7) Sciurus 
gerrardi salaquensis, p. 592; (8) S. gerrardi cucute, p. 592; (9) S. saltuensis magdalene, 594; 
(10) S. duida, p. 594; (11) S. igniventris zamore, 594; (12) S. langsdorffii urucumus, p. 595; 
(13) S. langsdorffii steinbachi, p. 596; (14) S. stramineus zarume, 597. 


New South American Monkeys. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, pp. 
647-655, Dec. 14, 1914. 


Spp. et subspp. nov.: (1) Callicebus lugens duida, p. 647; (2) Alouatta seniculus bogotensis, 
p. 648; (38) A. seniculus caquetensis, p. 650; (4) Pithecia milleri, p. 650; (5) Cacajao roosevelti, 
p. 651; (6) Aleles longimembris, p. 65; (7) A. robustus, p. 652; (8) Cebus apella brunneus, 653; 
(9) C. xquatorialis, p. 654. 


The Generic Names Speothos and Icticyon.<Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 
XXVII, p. 147, July 10, 1914. 


Both genera tenable, not synonyms as held by some authors. 


Individual Variation in Muskoxen. <IX° Congrés International de Zoologie 
tenu 4 Monaco, 1913, pp. 210-215. Separates received in June, 1914. 
With reference to the bones of the skull. 


1915. 


Review of the South American Sciuride.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXXIV, pp. 147-309, pll. i-xiv, and 25 text figs., May 17, 1915. 


Historical outline, pp. 151-158; general considerations, pp. 158-168; genera and sub- 
genera of American squirrels, pp. 169-186; systematic review of the South American squirrels, 


82 


260. 


261. 


262. 


263. 


264. 


265. 


266. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


pp. 187-296; geographic distribution and interrelationships of South American squirrels, 
pp. 297-307. ‘ 

Gen. nov.: (1) Leptosciurus, p. 199; (2) Mesosciurus, p. 212; (8) Hadrosciurus, p. 265; 
(4) Urosciurus, p. 267; (5) Simosciurus, p. 280; (6) Histriosciurus (subgen. nov.), p. 236. 
Subspp. nov.: (1) Guerlinguetus xstuans venustus, p. 260; (2) Mesosciurus gerrardi baudensis, 
p. 308; (8) M. gerrardi valdivia, p. 309. 

Plates i-v, skulls of North American species; vi, maxillary teeth of same; vii-xii, skulls of 
South American species; xiii and xiv, maxillary teeth of same; text figs. 1-16, skins of South 
American species, to show relative size; text figs. 17-19, skull of Syntheosciurus brochus, p. 
176; text figs. 20-21, hind foot of Notosciurus and Mesosciurus, p. 211; text figs. 22-25, 
distribution maps of genera. 


Notes on American Deer of the Genus Mazama.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., XXXIV, pp. 521-553. 


24 forms recognized, the following new: (1) Mazama trinitalis, p. 532; (2) M. americana 
tumatumari, p. 536; (8) M. americana juruana, p. 537; (4) M. gualea, p. 545; (5) M. fuscata, 
p. 545; (6) M. zamora, p. 546; (7) M. murelia, p. 547; (8) M. cita sanctemarte, p. 550. 


New South American Mammals. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXIV, pp. 
625-634, Dec. 30, 1915. . 


(1) Dasyprocta fuliginosa candelensis, p. 625; (2) Dasyprocta variegata zamore, p. 627; 
(3) Dasyprocta variegata chocoensis, p. 627; (4) Dasyprocta variegata urucuma, p. 634; (5) 
Proechimys kermiti, p. 629; (6) Oryzomys mureliz (nom. nov., to replace QO. incertus Allen, 
1913, preoccupied), p. 630; (7) Procyon (Euprocyon) xquatorialis, p. 630; (8) Margay tigrina 
elene, p. 631; (9) Margay caucensis, p. 631; (10) Oncoides pardalis tumatumari, p. 632; (11) 
Eptesicus chapmani, p. 632. 


Convenience versus Fitness.< Science, N. S., XLII, No. 1084, pp. 492-494, 
Oct. 8, 1915. 


On the function of the genus in classification, in reply to objectors who oppose subdivision 
of the “good old genera’”’ of fifty years ago. Certain groups of mammals cited in illustration. 


O16. 


The proper Generic Name of the Macaques. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXXV, pp. 49-52, Feb. 21, 1916. 


Silenus Goldfuss, 1820. The subgeneric names of the macaques and their near allies 
also considered. Comparison (in parallel columns) of the generic and subgeneric names 
of macaques employed by Elliot (Primates, 1913) with those here adopted. 


New South American Mammals.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXYV, 
pp. 83-87, April 28, 1916. 


(1) Metachirus nudicaudatus antioquiz, p. 83; (2) Tamandua tetradactyla punensis, p. 83; 
(3) Sylvilagus boylei, p. 84; (4) Cavia (Cavia) anolaime, p. 85; (6) Glossophaga apolinari, p. 
86; (7) Saimiri caquetensis, p. 87. 


The Neotropical Weasels. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXV, pp. 89-111, 
April 26, 1916. 


Historical résumé, pp. 90-91; color variations in the Mustela tropicalis group, pp. 91-98; 
the status of Mustela affinis Gray, pp. 98-99; systematic review of the species and subspecies, 
pp. 99-111. 

8 forms recognized — 6 species and 2 additional subspecies. Mustela tropicalis nicar- 
ague, p. 100, subsp. nov. 


List of Mammals collected for the American Museum in Ecuador by William 
B. Richardson, 1912-1913.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXYV, pp. 113- 
125, May 11, 1916. 


Annotated list of 70 species and subspecies, with locality records, etc. 


— oe 


— 


ee ae 


: 
‘ 


MAMMALS. 83 


267. List of Mammals collected in Colombia by the American Museum of Natural 
History Expeditions, 1910-1915.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXV, 
pp. 191-238, May 31, 1916. 


Annotated list of 185 species and subspecies, with locality records, and technical comment, 
particularly on some of the Muride, Carnivores and Primates. Several extralimital Primates 
included for purpose of record and comment. Alouatia seniculus group, pp. 228-231. 


268. New Mammals collected on the Roosevelt Brazilian Expedition. <<Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XV, pp. 523-530, July 24, 1916. 


Species et subspp. nov.: (1) Proechimys boimensis, p. 523; (2) Gicomys milleri, p. 523; 
(3) GE. florenciz, p. 524; (4) Gl. emiliz, p. 525; (5) Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) microtis, p. 525; 
(6) O. (O.) utiaritensis, p. 527; (7) O. (O.) mattogrosse, p. 528; (8) Zygodontomys tapira- 
poanus, p. 528; (9) Zygodontomys tapirapoanus, p. 528; (10) Molossus cherriei, p. 529; 
(11) Molossus daulensis, p. 530. 


269. Mammals collected on the Roosevelt Brazilian Expedition, with Field Notes 
by Leo E. Miller. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXV, pp. 559-610, Aug. 
9, 1916. 


Introduction, pp. 559-562; systematic list, 97 species and subspecies, pp. 562-588, with 
much technical comment; field notes by Leo E. Miller, on 53 species, pp. 589-610. 
Tapirus terrestris guianiz (p. 566), subsp. nov. 


270. An Extinct Octodont from the Island of Porto Rico, West Indies.<Ann. New 
York Acad. Sci., X XVII, pp. 17-22, pll. i-v, Jan. 25, 1916. 


Isolobodon portoricensis (gen. et sp. nov.), p. 19. 


Note.— The above list of titles ends with August, 1916. They are numbered 
1-270, plus 117a and 258a. No. 32 isan inadvertent duplication of No. 26. Actual 
number of titles, 271. 


FAMILIES, SUPERFAMILIES, SUBFAMILIES, GENERA and SUBGENERA, and SPECIES 
and SUBSPECIES, DESCRIBED AS NEW OR RENAMED.! 


Higher Groups. 


Oulophocine,? Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., II, 1870, p. 44. 

Trichiphocine,? ibid., p. 44. 

Castoroidide, Monographs N. Amer. Rodentia (Rep. U. 8. Geolog. Surv. Terr. 
(Hayden), XI, 1877, p. 419.) 

Odobenide, Hist. N. Amer. Pinnipeds, 1880, pp. 3, 5. 

Gressigrada, tbid., p. 3 = Odobenide + Otarlide. 

Reptigrada, ibid., p. 4 = Phocide. 


Genera and Subgenera. 


Bassaricyon, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1876, pp. 20-23, pl. i. Type, 
Bassaricyon gabbi, sp. nov. 

Ictidomys, Monographs N. Amer. Rodentia, p. 821, August, 1877. Type, Sper- 
mophilus tridecemlineatus Mitchell. 

Pachycyon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zod6l., X, No. 2, pp. 4-8, pll. i-iii, Dec., 1885. Type, 
Pachycyon robustus, sp. nov. Extinct. 


1 Arranged chronologically. 
2 Tentatively proposed as subfamilies of the Otariide and subsequently abandoned. 


84. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


_ Microsciurus (subgen. of Sciurus), Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 333, Nov. 8, 
1895. Type, Sciurus (M.) alfarot. 

Zygodontomys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 38, March 11, 1897. Type, Ory- 
zomys cherriei Allen. 

Sigmodontomys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 38, Mareh 11, 1897. Type, S. 
alfari, sp. nov. (= Nectomys.) 

Proechimys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XII, p. 264, Dec. 26, 1899. Type, Echimys 
trinitatis Allen and Chapman. 

Caluromys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 189, Oct. 12,1900. Type, C. alstonz. 

To replace Philander Brisson, 1762, considered as properly a synonym of Didel- 

phis Linné, 1758. Under the principle of tautonymy Philander later became 
reinstated for this group, with Didelphis philander Linné as type. 

Paralces, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 160, July 1, 1902. Type, Cervus alces. 

A substitute name for Alces Gray, 1821, preoccupied by Alce Blumenbach, 1799, 

type Alce gigantea Blumenbach = Megaceros hibernicus Owen, 1844. 

Eunothocyon, Mamm. Patagonia, in Princeton Univ. Exped. Patagonia, III, pt. i, 
1905, p. 152. Type, Canis sladenit Thomas. 

Carcinocyon, ibid., p. 153. Type, Canis thous Linné. (Cerdocyon H. Smith, type 
Canis azare Wied, apud Thomas.) 

Tamiops, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXII, p. 477, July 25, 1906. Type, Tamiops 
macclellandt riudoni, subsp. nov. 

Hoplomys, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, p. 650, Sept. 11, 1908. Type, Hop- 
lomys truei sp. nov. 

Notosciurus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 585, Oct. 8, 1914. Type, 
Notosciurus rhoadsi sp. nov. 

Leptosciurus, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIV, p. 199, May 17, 1915. Type, 
Macroxus pucheranit Fitzinger = Sciurus rufoniger Pucheran. 

Mesosciurus, ibid., p. 212. Type, Sciwrus estuans var. hoffmanni Peters. 

Histriosciurus, tbid., p. 213 (subgenus of Mesosciurus). Type, Sciurus gerrardit Gray. 

Hadrosciurus, ibid., p. 265. Type, Sciurus flammifer Thomas. 

Urosciurus, ibid., p. 267. Type, Sciurus tricolor Poeppig. 

Simosciurus, ibid., p. 280. Type, Sciurus stramineus Eydoux and Souleyet. 

Isolobodon, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., XXXVII, p. 19, Jan. 26, 1916. Type, 
Isolobodon portoricensis sp. nov. 


SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES. 
1874. 


Tamias quadrivittatus var. pallidus, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVI, Feb. 1874, 
p. 289. (Hutamias.) 1 

Spermophilus tridecemlineatus var. pallidus, ibid., p.291. (Ictidomys.) 

Spermophilus parryi var. kodiacensis, ibid., p. 291. (Citellus.) 


1876. 


Canis mississippiensis, Amer. Journ. Sci. and Arts, ser. 3, XI, Jan. 1876, p. 49. 
(Extinct.) 


1 Present current generic and specific names are given in parentheses when different from those 
originally employed. 


MAMMALS. 85 


Cervus whitneyi, ibid., p. 49. (Extinct.) 
Bassaricyon gabbi, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1876, p. 20. 


1877. 


Lepus sylvaticus var. arizone, Mon. N. Amer. Roden., p. 332, August, 1877. (Syl- 
vilagus audubonii arizone.) 

Lepus graysoni, ibid., p. 347. (Sylvilagus.) 

Lepus brasiliensis var. gabbi, ibid., p. 419. (Sylvilagus.) 

Tamias astaticus var. borealis, ibid., p. 7938. (Hutamias quadrivittatus borealis.) 


1885, 
Pachycyon robustus, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., X, pp. 4-8, pll. i-iii, 1885. (Extinct.) 


1887. 
Squalodon tiedemant, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, p. 34, April 25, 1887. (Ex- 
tinct.) 
1889. 


Sciurus alstoni, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, p. 167, Oct. 21, 1889 (name pre- 
occupied; replaced by S. nayaritensis Allen, 1889). 

Tamias asiaticus bulleri, ibid., p. 173. (Hutamias bulleri.) 

Tamias asiaticus merriami, ibid., p. 176. (EHutamias merriami.) 

Sigmodon fulviventer, ibid., p. 180. 


1890. 


Tamias obscurus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 70, June, 1890. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias senex, ibid., p. 88. (Eutamias.) 

Tamias frater, vbid., p. 88. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias amenus, tbid., p. 90. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias cinereicollis, ibid., p. 94. (EHutamias.) 

Tamias umbrinus, ibid., p.96. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias quadrivittatus gracilis, ibid., p.99. (EHutamias.) 

Tamias quadrivittatus lutewentris, ibid.,p.101. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias quadrivittatus affinis, ibid., p.103. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias quadrivittatus neglectus, ibid., p. 106. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias minimus consobrinus, tbid., p. 112. (Eutamias.) 

Tamias minimus pictus, tbid., p.115. (EHutamias.) 

Lepus cinerascsens, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., ITT, p. 159, Oct., 1890. (Sylvilagus.) 

Lepus sylvaticus floridanus, ibid., p. 160. (Sylvilagus.) 

Sciurus hudsonius vancouverensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., II], p. 165, Nov. 14, 
1890. 

Sciurus hudsonius californicus, ibid., p. 165 (name preoccupied; replaced by S. 
albolambatus Allen, 1898). 

Artibeus coryt, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 173, Nov. 14, 1890. 

Vespertilio velifer, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., ITI, p. 177, Dec. 10, 1890. (Myotis.) 

Sciurus cervicalis, tbid., p. 183. 

Lepus sylvaticus aztecus, tbid., p. 188. (Sylvilagus floridanus aztecus.) 

Lepus insolitus, vbid., p. 189. (Sylvilagus cunicularius insolitus.) 

Lepus truet, tbid., p. 192. (Sylvilagus.) 


bei fih i, — 


SO BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1891. 


Histiotus maculatus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 195, Feb. 20, 1891. (Huderma 
maculatum.) 

Blarina costaricensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 205, April 17, 1891. (?= 
Blarina brevicauda.) 

Hesperomys (Vesperimus) cherriet, ibid., p.211. (Reithrodontomys.) 

Hesperomys (Vesperimus) nudipes, ibid., p. 213. (Peromyscus.) 

Hesperomys (Oryzomys) alfaroi, ibid., p. 214. (Oryzomys.) 

Scalops argentatus texanus, tbid., p. 221. (Scalopus.) 

Dipodops sennetti, rbid., p. 226. (Perodipus.) 

Dipodops ordii palmeri, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., II], p. 276, June 30, 1891. 
(Perodipus.) 

Dipodops richardsoni, ibid., p. 277. (Perodipus.) 

Perognathus (Chetodipus) femoralis, tbid., p. 281. 

Neotoma micropus canescens, ibid., p. 285. 

Oryzomys aquaticus, ibid., p. 289. 

Vesperimus difficilis, ibid., p. 298. (Peromyscus.) 

Vesperimus nasutus, tbid., p. 299. (Peromyscus.) 

Vesperimus mearnsi, ibid., p. 300. (Peromyscus.) 

Capromys ingrahami, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 329, Aug. 31, 1891. 

Oryzomys talamance, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., XIV, 1891, p. 193. 

Hesperomys (Vesperimus) affinis, tbid., p. 195. (Peromyscus.) 


1892. 


Perognathus merriami, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, p. 45, pl. 11, March 25, 1892. 
Atalapha brachyotis, ibid., p. 47. (Lasiurus.) 
Oryzomys bauri, ibid., p. 48. 


1893. 


Sciurus apache, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 29, March 16, 1893. 

Thomomys monticolus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 48, April 28, 1893. 

Thomomys aureus, tbid., p. 49. 

Thomomys fossor, ibid., p. 51. 

Thomomys toltecus, ibid., p. 52. 

Zapus princeps, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 71, April 28, 1893. 

Arvicola (Mynomes) aztecus, ibid., p. 73. (Microtus.) 

Reithrodontomys aztecus, ibid., p. 79. 

Sitomys auripectus, ibid., p. 75. (Peromyscus.) 

Sitomys rowleyi, ibid., p.76. (Peromyscus.) 

Sitomys americanus thurberi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 185, August 18, 1893. a 
(Peromyscus.) | 

Sitomys martirensis, ibid., p. 187. (Peromyscus.) | 

Sitomys gilberti, ibid., p. 188. (Peromyscus.) 

Tamias leucurus peninsule, ibid., p. 197. (Ammospermophilus.) . 

Scapanus anthonyt, tbid., p. 200. 

Cheronycteris intermedia, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 207, Sept. 21, 1893 (with 
F. M. Chapman). 


Ee 


a 


MAMMALS. 87 


Nectomys palmipes, ibid., p. 209. 

Tylomys couest, ibid., p. 211. (Rhipidomys.) 

Oryzomys speciosus, ibid., p. 212. 

Oryzomys trinitatis, tbid., p. 213. 

Oryzomys velutinus, tbid., p. 214. 

Oryzomys brevicauda, ibid., p. 215. (Zygodontomys.) 

Loncheres castaneus, ibid., p. 222. 

Echimys trinitatis, ibid., p. 223. (Proechimys.) 

Oryzomys costaricensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 239, Sept. 22, 1893. 
Didelphys (Micoureus) canescens, ibid., p. 235. (Marmosa.) 

Sitomys robustus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 335, Dec. 16, 1893. (Peromyscus.) 
Geomys cherriet, tbid., p. 337. (Macrogeomys.) 


1894. 


Evotomys fuscodorsalis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, p. 108, April 14, 1894. 
(Hvotomys gappert.) 

Lepus sylvaticus mearnsi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, p. 171, May 31, 1894. 
(Sylvilagus.) 

Oryzomys palustris texensis, ibid., p. 177. 

Perognathus pricet, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, p. 318, Nov. 7, 1894. 

Perognathus conditi, ibid., p. 318. 

Reithrodontomys mexicanus fulvescens, tbid., p. 319. 

Arvicola leucopheus, ibid., p. 321. (Microtus.) 

Sitomys americanus arizone, tbid., p. 321. (Peromyscus.) 

Neotoma campestris, tbid., p. 322. 

Neotoma rupicola, tbid., p. 328. 

Neotoma grangert, ibid., p. 324. 

Sciurus hudsonicus dakotensis, tbid., p. 325. 

Phenacomys truet, tbid., p. 331. 

Arvicola insperatus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VI, p. 347, Dec. 7, 1894. (Microtus.) 

Lepus texianus eremicus, wbid., p. 347. 

Lepus sylvaticus pinetis, ibid., p. 348. (Sylvilagus nuttalli pinetis.) 

Sciurus arizonensis huachuca, ibid., p. 349. 

Sciurus hudsonicus grahamenstis, ibid., p. 350. 


1895. 


Reithrodontomys merriamt, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 119, May 21, 1895. 

Reithrodontomys dychet, ibid., p. 120. 

Reithrodontomys dychet nebrascensts, ibid., p. 122. 

Reithrodontomys megalotis desertt, ibid., p. 127. 

Reithrodontomys arizonensis, vbid., p. 134. 

Reithrodontomys mexicanus intermedius, ibid., p. 186. 

Reithrodontomys mexicanus aurantius, tbid., p. 137. 

Reithrodontomys costaricensis, ibid., p. 139. 

Lynx texensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 188, June 20, 1895. 

Thomomys cervinus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 203, June 29, 1895. 

Lepus sylvaticus grangeri, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 264, August 21, 1895. 
(Sylvilagus nuttalli grangeri.) 


88 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Lepus aquaticus attwateri, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VII, p. 327, Nov. 8, 1896. 
(Sylvilagus.) 

Reithrodontomys australis, tbid., p. 328. 

Oryzomys cherriet, ibid., p. 329. (Zygodontomys.) 

Peromyscus attwatert, ibid., p. 330. 

Neotoma cinnamomea, ibid., p. 331. 

Sciurus (Microsciurus) alfari, ibid., p. 333. (Microsciurus.) 

Tamias pricet, tbid., p. 333. (Hutamias.) 

Tamias wortmani, ibid., p. 335. (Callospermophilus.) 

Spermophilus tridecemlineatus olivaceus, ibid., p. 337. (Ictidomys.) 

Spermophilus tridecemlineatus parvus, tbid., p. 337. (Ictidomys.) 

Blarina (Soriciscus) nigrescens, ibid., p. 339. (Cryptotis.) 

Blarina (Soriciscus) orophila, ibid., p. 340. (Cryptotis.) 


1896. 


Rangifer terrenove, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., VIII, p. 233, Nov. 21, 1896. 
Reithrodontomys laceyi, ibid., p. 235. . 
Perognathus mearnst, tbid., p. 237. 

Peromyscus michiganensis pallescens, ibid., p. 238. 

Vespertilio incautus, ibid., p. 239. (Myotis.) 

Vespertilio chrysonotus, ibid., p. 340. (Myotis.) 


1897. 


Peromyscus yucatanicus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., [X, p. 8, Feb. 23, 1897 (with 
F. M. Chapman). 

Reithrodontomys mexicanus gracilis, tbid., p. 9. 

Heteromys gaumeri, tbid., p. 9. 

Artibeus palmarum, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Ese IX, p. 16, Feb. 26, 1897 iia F.M. 
Chapman). 

Oryzomys delicatus, ibid., p. 19. 

Akodon urichi, ibid., p. 19. 

Akodon frustrator, ibid., p. 20. 

Thylamys carri, ibid., p. 27. 

Artibeus intermedius, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., [X, p. 33, March 11, 1897. 

Oryzomys chrysomelas, ibid., p.37. (Melanomys.) 

Sigmodontomys alfari, ibid., p. 39. (Nectomys.) 

Sigmodon boruce, ibid., p. 40. 

Peromyscus spicilegus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 50, March 15, 1897. 

Peromyscus banderanus, tbid., p. 51. 

Oryzomys mexicanus, ibid., p. 52. 

Oryzomys bulleri, ibid., p. 53. 

Sigmodon mascotensis, tbid., p. 54. 

Sigmodon colime, ibid., p. 55. 

Heteromys hispidus, ibid., p. 56. (Liomys.) 

Ovis stonet, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 111, April 7, 1897. 

Sciurus (Microsciurus) peruanus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 115, April 26, 
1897. (Microsciurus.) 


MAMMALS. 89° 


Oryzomys baront, ibid., p. 118. 

Sigmodon peruanus, ibid., p. 118. 

Sigmodon bogotensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 121, May 24, 1897. 

Mus musculus jalape, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 198, June 16, 1897 (with. 
F. M. Chapman). 

Reithrodontomys rufescens, ibid., p. 199. 

Reithrodontomys saturatus, ibid., p. 201. 

Peromyscus furvus, ibid., p. 201. 

Peromyscus melanotis, vbid., p. 203. 

Peromyscus musculus brunneus, tbid., p. 203. 

Oryzomys jalape, tbid., p. 206. 

Adelonycteris gaumeri, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., IX, p. 231, Sept. 28,1897. (Eptesie- 
cus.) 


1898. 


Marmosa sinaloe, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X, p. 143, April 12, 1898. 

Lepus peninsularis, tbid., p. 144. (Sylvilagus.) 

Lepus cerrosensis, ibid., p. 145. (Sylvilagus.) 

Lepus arizone confinis, tbid., p. 146. (Sylvilagus.) 

Thomomys fulvus anite, ibid., p. 146. 

Thomomys fulvus martirensis, tbid., p. 147. 

Thomomys atrovarius, ibid., p. 148. 

Perognathus pernix, ibid., p. 149. 

Neotoma sinaloe, ibid., p. 149. 

Neotoma arenacea, ibid., p. 150. 

Neotoma anthonyt, ibid., p. 151. 

Peromyscus eremicus propinquus, tbid., p. 154. 

Peromyscus cedrocensis, tbid., p. 154. 

Peromyscus cineritius, tbid., p. 155. 

Peromyscus geronimensis, ibid., p. 156. 

Peromyscus exiguus, tbid., p. 157. 

Peromyscus dubius, ibid., p. 157. 

Sciurus hudsonicus baileyi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X, p. 261, August 31, 1898. 

Sciurus hudsonizus ventorum, ibid., p. 263. 

Sciurus hudsonicus streatori, tbid., p. 267. 

Sciurus douglasti cascadensis, tbid., p. 277. 

Sciurus fremonti neomexicanus, tbid., p. 291. 

Sciurus wagneri, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X, p. 453, Nov. 1898 (nom. nov., given in. 
error to replace S. varius Wagner, preoccupied). 

Sciurus douglasii albolimbatus, tbid., p. 453 (to replace Sciurus hudsonius californicus 
Allen, 1890, preoccupied). 


1899. 


Zapus saltator, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XII, p. 3, March 4, 1899. 
Phenacomys constablet, ibid., p. 4. 
Microtus stonet, ibid., p. 5. (Microtus drummondii.) 
Microtus vellerosus, ibid., p. 7. (Microtus mordaz.) 
Microtus cautus, ibid., p. 7. (Microtus mordaz.) 


90 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Lepus americanus pheonotus, ibid., p, 11. 

Lepus bishopt, ibid., p. 11. 

Lepus floridanus chapmani, ibid., p. 13. (Sylvilagus.) 

Thomomys fulvus alticolus, ibid., p. 13. 

Reithrodontomys tenuis, tbid., p. 15. 

Peromyscus texanus subarcticus, ibid., p. 15. (Peromyscus maniculatus artemisie.) 

Sciurus chapmani, ibid., p. 16. (Mesosciurus.) 

Lepus (Sylvilagus) superciliaris, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XII, p. 196, Dec. 20, 
1899. 

Isothrix rufodorsalis, tbid., p. 197. 

Echimys mince, ibid., p. 199. (Proechimys.) 

Echimys urtcht, ibid., p. 199. (Proechimys.) 

Echimys canicollis, ibid., p. 200. (Proechimys.) 

Heteromys jesupt, ibid., p. 201. 

Akodon venezuelensis, tbid., p. 203. 

Akodon colombianus, ibid., p. 203. (Melanomys.) 

Oryzomys maculiventer, ibid., p. 204. 

Oryzomys trichurus, ibid., p. 206. (Gcomys.) 

Oryzomys sanctemarte, ibid., p. 207. 

Oryzomys mollipilosus, ibid., p. 208. 

Oryzomys magdalene, ibid., p. 209. 

Oryzomys villosus, tbid., p. 210. 

Oryzomys palmarius, tbid., p. 210. 

Oryzomys tenuicauda, tbid., p. 211. 

Oryzomys modestus, tbid., p. 212. 

Oryzomys fulviventer, ibid., p. 212. 

Sciurus saltuensis bonde, ibid., p. 218. 

Sciurus (Guerlinguetus) quebradensis, p. 217. (= Mesosciurus chapmant.) 


1900. 


Chiroderma jesupi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 88, May 12, 1900. 

Mycronycteris hypoleuca, ibid., p. 90. 

Promops affinis, ibid., p. 91. 

Promops milleri, ibid., p. 92. 

Caluromys alstoni, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 189, Oct. 12, 1900. (Phil- 
ander.) 

Didelphis pernigra, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 191, Oct. 23, 1900. 

Didelphis karkinophaga cauce, ibid., p. 192. 

Didelphis karkinophaga colombica, tbid., 193. 

Metachirus fuscogriseus, tbid., p. 194. 

Metachirus tschudit, rbid., p. 195. 

Metachirus nudicaudatus colombianus, ibid., p. 196. 

Marmosa chapmani, ibid., p. 197. 

Marmosa klagesi, ibid., p. 198. 

Thylamys keayst, ibid., p. 198. 

Dacetylomys peruanus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 220, Nov. 16, 1900. 

Oxymycterus juliace, ibid., p. 223. 


MAMMALS. 91 


Oxymycterus apicalis, ibid., p. 224. (Lenoxus.) 
Oryzomys keayst, ibid., p. 225. 
Oryzomys obtusirostris, ibid., p. 226. 


1901. 


Zygodontomys thomasi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, p. 39, Jan. 31, 1901. 
Sigmodon simonst, ibid., p. 40. 

Rhipidomys ochrogaster, ibid., p. 43. 

Phyllotis osile, wbid., p. 44. 

Akodon lutescens, ibid., p. 46. 

Rangifer stonei, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, p. 148, May 28, 1901. 
Didelphis marsupialis texensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, p. 172, June 15, 1901. 
Didelphis marsupialis tabascenstis, ibid., p. 173. 

Didelphis richmondi, ibid., p. 175. 

Didelphis yucatanensis, tbid., p. 178. 

Metachirus fuscogriseus pallidus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, p. 215, July 3, 1901. 
Metachirus griscescens, ibid., p. 217. 

Orizomys bolivaris, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIV, p. 405, Nov. 30, 1901. 
Oryzomys castaneus, ibid., p. 406. 

Oryzomys perenensis, ibid., p. 406. 

Oryzomys rivularis, ibid., p. 407. 

Phyllotis chacoensis, tbid., p. 408. 

Phyllotis cachinus, vbid., p. 409. 

Eligmodontia morgant, ibid., p. 409. 

Akodon tucumanensis, ibid., p. 410. 

Metachirus nudicaudatus bolivianus, vbid., p. 411. 


1902. 


Dama lichtensteini, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 20, Feb. 1, 1902 (nom. nov., 
to replace Cervus mexicanus Lichtenstein held to be preoccupied by Cervus 
mexicanus Gmelin, unidentifiable.) (Odocoileus.) 

Rangifer granti, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 119, April 7, 1902. 

Ursus merriami, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 141, April 12, 1902. 

Rangifer osborni, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 149, April 16, 1902. 

Ovis dalli kenaiensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 145, April 23, 1902. 

Didelphis marsupialis insularis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 259, August 18, 
1902. 

Didelphis marsupialis cauce, tbid., p. 261. 

Didelphis marsupialis etensis, ibid., p. 262. 

Didelphis paraguayensis andina, ibid., p. 272. 

Didelphis paraguayensis meridensis, tbid., p. 274. 

Rangifer pearyt, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 409, Oct. 31, 1902. 

Phoca hispida gichigensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XVI, p. 478, Dec. 12, 1902. 

Phoca ochotensis macrodens, ibid., p. 483. 

Phoca stejnegeri, ibid., p. 485. 

Phoca richardii pribilofensis, ibid., p. 495. 

Phoca richardii geronimensis, ibid., p. 495. 


92 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1903. 


Sigmodon puna, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, p. 99, March 20, 1903. 
Citellus buxtoni, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIX, p. 139, May 9, 1903. 
Citellus stejnegeri, ibid., p. 142. 

Evotomys (Craseomys) latastet, ibid., p. 145. 

Evotomys jochelsoni, ibid., p. 148. 

Lemmus obensts chrysogaster, ibid., p. 153. 

Ochotona kolymensis, ibid., p. 154. 

Lepus gichiganus, tbid., p. 155. 

Vulpes anadyrensis, tbid., p. 167. 

Putorius (Arctogale) pygmeus, tbid., p. 176. (Mustela.) 

Erinaceus orientalis, ibid., p. 179. 

Sorex buxtont, ibid., p. 181. 

Ctenomys robustus, Bull, Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, p. 185, May 9, 1903. (C. osgoodi.) 
Ctenomys sericeus, ibid., p. 187. 

Ctenomys colborni, ibid., p. 188. 

Oxymycterus microtis, tbid., p. 189. 

Reithrodon cuniculoides obscurus, tbid., p. 190. 

Reithrodon hatcheri, ibid., p. 191. 

Euneomys petersoni, tbid., p. 192. 

Citellus stonet, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIX, p. 537, Oct. 10, 1903. 
Synaptomys (Mictomys) andersont, ibid., p. 554. 

Synaptomys (Mictomys) chapmani, ibid., p. 555. 

Erethizon epizanthus nigrescens, wbid., p. 558. 

Putorius microtis, ibid., p. 563. (Mustela.) 

Odocoileus battyi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, p. 591, Nov. 13, 19038. 
Eutamias durange, tbid., p. 594. 

Citellus (Otospermophilus) grammurus rupestris, tbid., p. 595. 

Peromyscus paulus, ibid., p. 598. 

Peromyscus texanus flaccidus, ibid., p. 599. (Peromyscus leucopus tornillo.) 
Sigmodon baileyi, ibid., p. 601. 

Reithrodontomys megalotis sestinensis, tbid., p. 602. 

Neotoma intermedia durange, ibid., p. 602. 

Perodipus obscurus, tbid., p. 603. 

Lepus (Macrotolagus) texianus micropus, tbid., p.605. (Lepus californicus texianus.) 
Lepus (Macrotolagus) gaillardi battyi, tbid., p. 607. 

Lepus (Sylvilagus) durange, ibid., p. 609. (Sylvilagus floridanus holzneri.) 
Canis impavidus, tbid., p. 609. 

Myotis californicus durange, tbid., p. 612. 

Odocoileus sinaloe, rbid., p. 613. 

Lynx ruffus escuinape, tbid., p. 614. 


1904. 


Oreamnos montanus columbianus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 20, Feb. 10. 
1904. (O. americanus columbie. ) 

Oreamnos montanus missoul@, ibid., p. 20. (O. americanus missoule.) 

Lepus (Sylvilagus) russatus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 31, Feb. 29, 1904. 


MAMMALS. 93 


Lepus (Sylvilagus) parvulus, tbid., p. 34. 

Tayra barbara trara, ibid., p. 36. 

Akodon trazu, ibid., p. 46. (Scoteomys.) 

Felis carrikert, ibid., p. 47. 

Nasua narica bullata, ibid., p. 48. 

Nasua narica panamensis, ibid., p. 51. 

Nasua narica yucatanica, tbid., p. 52. 

Nasua narica pallida, ibid., p. 58. 

Sigmodon boruce chiriquensis, ibid., p. 68. 

Felis mearnsi, ibid., p. 71 (nom. nov., to replace F’. costaricensis, preoccupied). 

Felis panamensis, tbid., p. 71. 

Potos flavus chiriquensis, ibid., p. 74. 

Potos flavus caucensis, ibid., p. 75. 

-Potos flavus chapadensis, vbid., p. 76. 

Myotis chiriquensis, tbid., p. 77. 

Sciurus aberti pheurus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 205, May 28, 1904. 

Sciurus aberti barberi, tbid., p. 207. 

Eutamias canescens, tbid., p. 208. 

Molossus coibensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 227, June 29, 1904. 

Molossus bonde, tbid., p. 228. 

-Promops barbatus, tbid., p. 228. 

Dermonotus suarpurensis, tbid., p. 229. 

Lonchophylla thomasi, ibid., p. 230. 

Artibeus rusbyi, ibid., p. 230. 

Artibeus insularis, tbid., p. 231. 

Artibeus yucatanicus, ibid., p. 232. 

’ Phyllostoma hastatus panamensis, ibid., p. 238. 

Phyllostoma hastatus caure, ibid., p. 234. 

‘Ovis storcki, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 298, Sept. 8, 1904. 

Peramys brevicaudatus dorsalis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 327, Oct. 8, 1904. 

‘Oryzomys tenutpes, ibid., p. 328. 

Akodon meridensis, ibid., p. 329. 

Holochilus venezuelensis, ibid., p. 330. 

Felis maripensis, ibid., p. 331. 

Felis sanctemarte, ibid., p. 332. 

Procyon proteus, rbid., p. 333. 

Nasua pheocephala, ibid., p. 334. 

Erethizon godfreyi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 383, Oct. 15, 1904. (Extinct.) 

Tamandua tetradactyla chapadensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 392, Oct. 29, 
1904. 

Tamandua tetradactyla instabilis, ibid., p. 392. 

Tamandua tetradactyla tenuirostris (= mexicana Saussure, 1860), ibid., p. 394. 

Tamandua tetradactyla chiriquensis, tbid., p. 395. ; 

Coendou sanctemarte, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX, p. 441, Nov. 28, 1904. 

Lutra colombiana, ibid., p. 452. 

Alouatta seniculus rubicunda, ibid., p. 458. 

Alouatta seniculus caucensis, tbid., p. 462. 


Q4 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1905. 


Eutamias lectus, Science Bull. Brooklyn Inst. Arts and Sciences, I, No. 6, p. 117, 


March 31, 1905. 
Eutamias adsitus, tbid., p. 118. 
Cynomys parvidens, ibid., p. 119. 
Marmota engelhardtt, ibid., p. 120. 
Ochotona cinnamomea, ibid., p. 121. 


Ctenomys osgoodi, Mamm. Patagonia, in Princeton Univ. Exped. to Patagonia, III, 


pt. i, p. 191 (nom. nov., to replace C. robustus Allen, preoccupied). 


Canis sclater:, ibid., p. 153 (nom. nov., to replace C. microtis Sclater, preoccupied). 


1906. 


Heteromys pictus escuinape, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXII, p. 211, July 25, 1906 
(Liomys.) 

Molossus sinaloe, ibid., p. 236. 

Sciurus poliopus tepicanus, ibid., p. 243. 

Sigmodon vulcani, ibid., p. 247. 

Heteromys jaliscensis, ibid., p. 251. 

Manis pusilla, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXII, p. 465, Dec. 17, 1906. 

Atherurus hainanus, ibid., p. 470. 

Ratufa gigantea hainana, ibid., p. 472. 

Funambulus riudonensis, ibid., p. 472. 

Sciurus erythreus insularis, ibid., p. 473. 

Tamiops macclellandt hainanus, tbid., p. 476. 

Tamiops macclellandi riudont, ibid., 477. 

Tupaia modesta, zbid., p. 481. 

Rhinolophus hainanus, ibid., p. 482. 

Hipposideros poutensis, ibid., p. 483. 

Scotophilus kuhlii insularis, tbid., p. 485. 

Scotophilus castaneus consobrinus, tbid., p. 485. 

Pipistrellus portensis, vbid., p. 487. 


1907 (None). 


1908. 


Ardops haitiensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, p. 581, Sept. 11, 1908. 
Molossus verrilli, ibid., p. 581. 


Lepus gabbi tumacus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, p. 649, Oct. 13, 1908. 


(Sylvilagus.) 
Hoplomys truei, ibid., p. 650. 
Heteromys vulcant, ea) p. 652. (Liomys.) 
Heteromys fuscatus, ibid., p. 652. 
Neotoma chrysomelas, tbid., p. 653. 
Oryzomys alfaroi incertus, ibid., p. 655. (O. alfarot.) 
Oryzomys ochraceus, ibid., p. 655. 
Oryzomys carrikeri, ibid., p. 656. 


a 


MAMMALS. 95 


Sigmodon hispidus griseus, vbid., p. 657. 

Ototylomys fumeus, ibid., p. 658. 

Peromyscus nicarague, ibid., p. 658. (P. mexicanus saxatilis.) 
Sciurus deppet matagalpe, ibid., p. 660. 

Lutra latidens, tbid., p. 660. 

Tayra barbara inserta, ibid., p. 662. 

Bassaricyon richardsont, ibid., p. 662. 

Blarina olivaceus, ibid., p. 669. (Cryptotis.) 

Artibeus jamatcensis richardsoni, tbid., p. 669. 

Alouatta palliata matagalpe, ibid., p.670. (= A. palliata palliata.) 


1909. 


Tragelaphus tjadert, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX VI, p. 148, March 19, 1909. 

Madoqua langi, ibid., p. 153. 

Arvicanthis natrobe, ibid., p. 168. 

Mus kijabius, ibid., p. 169. 

Crocidura kijabe, tbid., p. 173. 

Paradoxurus (Paguma) larvatus hainanus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XVI, p. 240, 
April 17, 1909. 

Mungos rubrifrons, ibid., p. 240. 

Myotalpa rufescens, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XVI, p. 428, Oct. 21, 1909. 

Sciurotamias owstoni, ibid., p. 428. 

Eutamias albogularis, ibid., p. 429. 


1910. 


Ursus americanus kenaiensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, p. 6, Jan. 5, 1910. 
(U. americanus pernigra.) 

Mus luteiventris, ibid., p. 14. 

Arctictis whiter, tbid., p. 17. 

Mungos palawanus, ibid., p. 17. . 

Macrogeomys matagalpe, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XVIII, p. 97, April 30, 1910. 

Oryzomys richardson, tbid., p. 99. 

Oryzomys nicarague, vbid., p. 100. 

Conepatus nicarague, tbid., p. 106. 

Ursus americanus perniger, ibid., p. 115 (nom. nov., to replace U. a. kenaiensts Allen, 
preoccupied). 

Chrotopterus carrikert, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XVIII, p. 147, May 27, 1910. 


1911. 


Cavia porcella venezuele, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXX, p. 250, Dec. 2, 1911. 
Loncheres carrikeri, tbid., p. 251. 

Urocyon cinereoargentea venezuele, ibid., p. 259. 

Chilonycteris rubiginosa fusca, vbid., p. 262. 

Mus andrewst, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXX, p. 336, Dec. 21, 1911. 

Mus buruensis, ibid., p. 336. 

Sciurus beebet, ibid., p. 338. 

Tamiops sauterei, ibid., p. 339. 


96 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1912. 


Sylvilagus (Tapeti) fulvescens, Bull. Am. Mus, Nat. Hist., XX XI, p. 75, April 19, 
1912, 

Heteromys lomitensis, tbid., p. 77. (= H. australis Thomas.) 

Reithrodontomys milleri, ibid., p. 77. 

Rhipidomys mollissimus, ibid., p. 78. 

Rhipidomys similis, tbid., p. 79. 

Rhipidomys cocalensis, ibid., p. 79. 

Thomasomys cinereiventer, rtbid., p. 80. 

Thomasomys popayanus, ibid., p. 81. 

Neacomys pusillus, ibid., p. 81. 

‘Oryzomys palmire, ibid., p. 83. 

‘Oryzomys pectoralis, ibid., p. 83. 

Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) munchiquensis, ibid., p. 85. 

Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) fulvirostris, ibid., p. 86. 

Oryzomys (Melanomys) obscurior affinis, ibid., p. 88. (Melanomys affinis.) 

Ai peomys fuscatus, ibid., p. 89. 

Microxus affinis, ibid., p. 89. 

Sciurus milleri, ibid., p. 91. (Mesosciurus gerrardi milleri.) 

Blarina (Cryptotis) squamipes, ibid., p. 93. 

Ochotona figginsi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XI, p. 103, May 28, 1912. 


1913. 


Ochotona (Pika) coreanus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XII, p. 429, Sept. 2, 1913. 

Meles melanogenys, ibid., p. 438. 

Cholepus florencie, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XXII, p. 469, Sept. 25, 1913. 

Cholepus agustinus, ibid., p. 470. 

Cholepus andinus, ibid., p. 472. 

Cholepus capitalis, ibid., p. 472. 

Tayassu niger, tbid., p. 476. 

Sylvilagus (Tapett) salentus, ibid., p. 476. 

Myoprocta millert, wbid., p. 477. 

Coendu quichua richardsoni, tbid., p. 478. 

Proechimys o’connelli, ibid., p. 479. 

Sigmodon chonensis, ibid., p. 479. 

Akodon tolime, wbid., p. 480. 

Potos flavus tolimensis, ibid., p. 481. 

Nasua olivacea lagunete, ibid., p. 483. 

Tayra barbara senilis, ibid., p. 484. 

Melanomys caliginosus oroensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XI, p. 538, Nov. 17, 
1913. 

Melanomys affinis monticola, tbid., p. 540. 

Melanomys pheopus vallicola, ibid., p. 544. 

Melanomys pheopus tolimensis, ibid., p. 545. 

Melanomys lomitensis, ibid., p. 545. 

Melanomys buenaviste, ibid., p. 547. 


MAMMALS. 97 


Oryzomys helvolus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXII, p. 597, Dec. 3, 1913. 
Oryzomys o’connelli, tbid., p. 597. 

Oryzomys vicencianus, wbid., p. 598. 

Oryzomys incertus, ibid., p. 598. (O. murelie.) 
Zygodontomys griseus, vbid., p. 599. 
Zygodontomys fraterculus, tbid., p. 599. 

Akodon chapmani, tbid., p. 600. 

Rhipidomys quindianus, ibid., p. 600. 
Rhipidomys caucensis, tbid., p. 601. 
Rhipidomys venezuele yuruanus, rbid., p. 601. 
Rhipidomys muilleri, zbid., p. 602. 

(comys mince, ibid., p. 603. 

Ccomys caicare, ibid., p. 603. 


1914. 


Microsciurus rubrirostris, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 163, Feb. 26, 1914. 

Microsciurus florencie, ibid., p. 164. 

Sylvilagus daulensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 199, Feb. 28, 1914. 

Thomasomys aureus altorum, ibid., p. 200. 

Amorphochilus schnablit osgoodi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 381, July 
9, 1914. 

Eptesicus andinus, tbid., p. 382. 

Dasypterus ega punensis, rbid., p. 382. 

Myotis ruber keayst, ibid., p. 383. 

Myotis punensis, tbid., p. 383. 

Myotis bonde, ibid., p. 384. 

Myotis maripensis, vbid., p. 385. 

Myotis esmeralde, ibid., p. 385. 

Myotis caucensis, ibid., p. 386. 

Nyctinomus equatorialis, vbid., p. 386. 

Mormopterus peruanus, ibid., p. 387. 

Thrinacodus apolinari, ibid., p. 387. 

Notosciurus rhoadsi, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 585, Oct. 8, 1914. 

Guerlinguetus pucheranit salentensis, vbid., p. 587. (Leptosciurus.) 

Guerlinguetus hoffmanni quindianus, ibid., p. 587. (Mesosciurus.) 

Guerlinguetus hoffmanni manavi, ibid., p. 589. (Mesosciurus.) 

Guerlinguetus griseimembra, ibid., p. 589. (Mesosciurus.) 

Guerlinguetus candelensis, tbid., p. 590. (Mesosciurus.) 

Sciurus gerrardi salaquensis, tbid., p. 592. (Mesosciurus.) 

Sciurus gerrardi cucute, ibid., p. 592. (Mesosciurus.) 

Sciurus saltuensis magdalene, tbid., p. 593. (Mesosciurus.) 

Sciurus duida, tbid., p. 594. (Urosciurus.) 

Sciurus igniventris zamore, tbid., p. 594. (Urosciurus.) 

Sciurus langsdorffit urucumus, vbid., p.595. (Urosciurus.) 

Sciurus langsdorffit stecnbachi, tbid., p. 596. (Urosciurus.) 

Sciurus stramineus zarume, ibid., p. 597. (Simosciurus.) 

Callicebus lugens duida, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, p. 647, Dec. 14, 1914. 

Alouatta seniculus bogotensis, ibid., p. 648. 


98 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Alouatta seniculus caquetensis, ibid., p. 650. 
Pithecia miller, tbid., p. 650. 

Cacajao roosevelti, ibid., p. 651. 

Ateles longimembris, ibid., p. 651. 

Ateles robustus, tbid., p. 652. 

Cebus apella brunneus, ibid., p. 6538. 

Cebus equatorialis, ibid., p. 654. 


1915. 


Guerlinguetus estuans venustus, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXIV, p. 260, May 17, 
1915. 

Mesosciurus gerrardi baudensis, ibid., p. 308. 

Mesosciurus gerrardi valdivie, ibid., p. 309. 

Mazama trinitatis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXXIV, p. 532, Nov. 2, 1915. 

Mazama americana tumatumari, ibid., p. 536. 

Mazama americana juruana, ibid., p. 537. 

Mazama gualea, ibid., p. 545. 

Mazama fuscata, ibid., p. 545. 

Mazama zamora, wbid., p. 546. 

Mazama murelia, ibid., p. 547. 

Mazama cita sanctemarte, ibid., p. 550. 

Dasyprocta fuliginosa candelensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XIV, p. 625, Dec. 
30, 1915. 

Dasyprocita variegata zamore, wbid., p. 627. 

Dasyprocta variegata chocoensis, ibid., p. 627. 

Dasyprocta variegata urucuma, ibid., p. 634. 

Proechimys kermiti, tbid., p. 629. 

Oryzomys murelie, ibid., p. 630 (to replace Oryzomys incertus Allen, 1913, preoccupied). 

Procyon (Euprocyon) equatorialis, ibid., 630. 

Margay tigrina elene, ibid., p. 631. 

Margay caucensis, ibid., p. 631. 

Oncoides pardalis tumatumari, vbid., p. 632. 

Eptesicus chapmani, ibid., p. 682. 


1916. 


Isolobodon portoricensis, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., XX VII, pp. 17-22, pll. i-iv, 
Jan. 25, 1916. 

Metachirus nudicaudatus antioquiw, Bull. Am. Mus, Nat. Hist., XXXV, p. 83, April 
28, 1916. 

Tamandua tetradactyla punensis, ibid., p. 83. 

Sylvilagus boylei, ibid., p. 84. 

Cavia (Cavia) anolaime, tbid., p. 85. 

Oryzomys barbacoas, ibid., p. 85. 

Glossophaga apolinari, ibid., p. 86. 

Saimiri caquetensis, ibid., p. 87. 

Mustela tropicalis nicarague, Bull. Am. Mus.. Nat. Hist., XXXV, p. 100, April 28, 
1916. 

Proechimys boimensis, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XV, p. 523, July 24, 1916. 


MAMMALS. 99 


comys milleri, ibid., p. 523. 

(Ecomys florencie, ibid., p. 524. 

(Ecomys emilie, rbid., p. 525. 

Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) microtis, ibid., p. 525. 

Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) utiaritensis, ibid., p. 527. 

Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) mattogrosse, ibid., p. 528. 

Zygodontomys tapirapoanus, vbid., p. 528. 

Molossus cherriet, itbid., p. 529. 

Molossus daulensis, ibid., p. 530. 

Tapirus terrestris guianie, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., XX XV, p. 566, Aug. 9, 1916. 


SUMMARY. 
ene erOUNS as. ces scr Us boas ceed Te li SPN aa Oe 6 
STDS, EINET TSU OY ELE IVES oe EE AM te Neng eee Re RE Oe a 21 
SDE EEC Sarai CMOS CClOS Megat ote Se See's ens eneityeige oseorsbe ake dite Negus alere diisieleiele ath ant ecnia 563 


Nomina nova (to replace preoccupied names).............eccccecccccccccees 10 


ae 


Ly 


i 
‘a 


) 


| ; 


bY 
2 
f 
t 
_ , 
. 
hae 
> 
i! 
=e 
ee 
& 
\ 
a BP 
{ 
f 
’ 
oO” 
a hy 
* < Ven 
v1 at, 


MAMMALS. 101 


INDEX TO MAMMALS. 


Notr.— The first reference is to the Bibliography (pp. 50-83), the second to the 


list of species, subspecies and higher groups (pp. 83-99). 


The original designation 


of the form (species of subspecies) is given in full except where a subgeneric name was 


included, which latter has been omitted in indexing. 


alphabetized by the subspecific name. 


Adelonycteris gaumeri, 66, 89. 
adsitus, Eutamias, 76, 94. 

‘Kpeomys fuscatus, 79, 96. 
zeequatorialis, Cebus, 81, 98. 
Nyctinomus, 81, 97. 
aa Lrocyon, 82, 98. 

affinis, Hesperomys, 60, 86. 

— Microxus, 79, 96. 

———— Oryzomys obscurior, 79, 96. 
——_—— Promops, 68, 90. 


Tamias quadrivittatus, 59, 85. 


agustinus, Cholcepus, 80, 96. 

Akodon chapmani, 80, 97. 
columbianus, 68, 90. 
frustrator, 65, 88. 
irazu, 74, 98. 
lutescens, 70, 91. 
meridensis, 74, 93. 
tolime, 80, 96. 
tucumanensis, 70, 91. 
urichi, 65, 68. 
venezuelensis, 68, 90. 

albogularis, Eutamias, 77, 95. 


albolimbatus, Sciurus hudsonicus, 66, 89. 


alfari, Sciurus, 64, 68. 
Sigmodontomys, 65, 88. 

alfaroi Hesperomys, 60, 86. 

Alouatta seniculus bogotensis, 81, 97. 
seniculus caquetensis, 81, 98. 
seniculus caucensis, 75, 93. 
palliata matagalpz, 77, 95. 
seniculus rubicunda, 75, 93. 

alstoni, Caluromys, 68, 90. 

Sciurus, 58, 85. 

alticolus, Thomomys fulvus, 66, 89. 

altorum, Thomasomys aureus, 81, 97. 

amoenus, Tamias, 59, 85. 


Under genera subspecies are 


Amorphochilus schnablii osgoodi, 81, 97. 
anadyrensis, Vulpes, 73, 92. 
andersoni, Synaptomys, 73, 92. 
andina, Didelphis paraguayensis, 72, 91. 
andinus, Choloepus, 80, 96. 
———— Eptesicus, 81, 97. 
andrewsi, Mus, 78, 95. 
anite, Thomomys fulvus, 66, 89. 
anolaime, Cavia, 82, 98. 
anthonyi, Neotoma, 66, 99. 
Scapanus, 61, 86. 
antioquize, Metachirus nudicaudatus, 82, 
98. 
apache, Sciurus, 61, 86. 
apicalis, Oxymycterus, 69, 91. 
apolinari, Glossophaga, 82, 98. 
Thrinacodus, 81, 97. 
aquaticus, Oryzomys, 60, 86. 
arenacea, Neotoma, 66, 89. 
Arctictis whitei, 78, 95. 
Ardops haitiensis, 77, 94. 
arizonze, Lepus sylvaticus, 55, 85. 
Sitomys americanus, 63, 87. 
arizonensis, Reithrodontomys, 63, 87. 
Artibeus coryi, 59, 85. 
insularis, 74, 93. 
palmarum, 65, 88. 
jamaicensis richardsoni, 77, 95. 
rusbyi, 74, 93. 
yucatanicus, 74, 93. 
Arvicanthis nairobe, 77, 95. 
Arvicola aztecus, 61, 86. 
insperatus, 63, 87. 
leucopheeus, 63, 87. 
Atalapha brachyotis, 60, 86. 
Ateles longimembris, 81, 98. 
robustus, 81, 98. 


102 


Atherurus hainanus, 76, 94. 

atrovarius, Thomomys, 66, 89. 

attwateri, Lepus aquaticus, 64, 88. 
Peromyscus, 64, 88. 

aurantius, Reithrodontomys mexicanus, 
63, 87. 

aureus, Thomomys, 61, 86. 

auripectus, Sitomys, 61, 86. 

australis, Reithrodontomys, 64, 88. 

aztecus, Arvicola, 61, 86. 

Lepus sylvaticus, 59, 85. 
Reithrodontomys, 61, 86. 

baileyi, Sciurus hudsonicus, 66, 89. 
Sigmodon, 73, 92. 

banderanus, Peromyscus, 65, 88. 

barbacoas, Oryzomys, 82, 98. 

barbatus, Promops, 74, 93. 

barberi, Sciurus aberti, 74, 93. 

baroni, Oryzomys, 66, 89. 

Bassaricyon, 52, 83. 
gabbi, 52, 54, 84. 
richardsoni, 77, 95. 

battyi, Lepus gaillardi, 73, 92. 

—-_—_— Odocoileus,, 73, 192: 

baudensis, Mesosciurus gerrardi, 82, 98. 

baueri, Oryzomys, 60, 86. 

beebei, Sciurus, 78, 95. 

bishopi, Lepus, 68, 90. 

Blarina costaricensis, 60, 86. 
nigrescens, 64, 88. 
olivacea, 77, 95. 
orophila, 64, 88. 
squamipes, 79, 96. 

bogotensis, Alouatta seniculus, 81, 97. 
Sigmodon, 66, 89. 

boimensis, Proechimys, 83, 98. 

bolivaris, Oryzomys, 70, 91. 


bolivianus, Metachirus nudicaudatus, 70, 


91. 
bondze, Molossus, 74, 93. 
Myotis, 81, 97. 
Sciurus saltuensis, 68, 90. 
borealis, Tamias asiaticus, 55, 85. 
boruce, Sigmodon, 65, 88. 
boylei, Sylvilagus, 82, 98. 
brachyotis, Atalapha, 60, 86. 
brevicauda, Oryzomys, 62, 87. 
brunneus, Cebus apella, 81, 98. 


Peromyscus musculus, 66, 89. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


buenavista, Melanomys, 80, 96. 
bullata, Nasua narica, 73, 92. 
bulleri, Oryzomys, 65, 88. 
Tamias asiaticus, 58, 85. 
buruensis, Mus, 78, 95. 
buxtoni, Citellus, 73, 92. 
Sorex, 73, 92. 
Cacajao roosevelti, 81, 98. 
cachinus, Phyllotis, 70, 91. 
caicaree, Gicomys, 80, 97. 
californicus, Sciurus hudsonius, 59, 85. 
Callicebus lugens duida, 81, 97. 
Caluromys, 68, 84. 
alstoni, 68, 90. 
campestris, Neotoma, 63, 87. 
candelensis, Dasyprocta fuliginosa, 82, 
98. 
Guerlinguetus, 81, 97. 
canescens, Didelphys, 62, 87. 
Eutamias, 74, 93. 
Neotoma micropus, 60, 86. 
canicollis, Echimys, 68, 90. 
Canis impavidus, 73, 92. 
mississippiensis, 52, 84. 
sclateri, 75, 94. 
capitalis, Cholcepus, 80, 96. 
Capromys ingrahami, 60, 86. 
caquetensis, Alouatta seniculus, 81, 98. 
Saimiri, 82, 98. 
Carcinocyon, 75, 84. 
carri, Thylamys, 65, 88. 
earrikeri, Chrotopterus, 78, 95. 
Felis, 74, 93. 

Loncheres, 78, 95. 
Oryzomys, 77, 94. 
cascadensis, Sciurus douglasii, 66, 89. 

castaneus, Loncheres, 62, 87. 
Oryzomys, 70, 91. 
Castoroidide, 55, 883. 
cauce, Didelphis karkinophaga, 69, 90. 
caucensis, Alouatta seniculus, 75, 93. 
Margay, 82, 98. 
Myotis, 81, 97. 
Potos flavus, 74, 93. 
Rhipidomys, 80, 97. 
caure, Phyllostoma hastatus, 74, 93. 
cautus, Microtus, 68, 89. 
Cavia anolaime, 82, 98. 
porcella venezuelze, 78, 95. 


MAMMALS. 1038 


Cebus equatorialis, 81, 98. 
apella brunneus, 81, 98. 
cedrosensis, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
cervicalis, Sciurus, 59, 85. 
cervinus, Thomomys, 64, 87. 
Cervus whitney, 52, 84. 
chacoensis, Phyllotis, 70, 91. 
Cheronycteris intermedia, 62, 86. 
chapadensis, Potos flavus, 74, 93. 


Tamandua tetradactyla, 75, 938. 


chapmani, Akodon, 80, 97. 
———— Eptesicus, 82, 98. 
Lepus floridanus, 68, 90. 
Marmosa, 69, 90. ; 
Sciurus, 68, 90. 
——— Synaptomys, 73, 92. 
cherriei, Geomys, 62, 87. 
— Hesperomys, 60, 86. 
Molossus, 83, 99. 
— Oryzomys, 64, 88. 
Chilonycteris rubiginosa fusca, 78, 95. 
chiriquensis, Myotis, 74, 93. 
Potos flavus, 74, 93. 
Sigmodon boruce, 74, 93. 


Tamandua tetradactyla, 75, 93. 


Chiroderma jesupi, 68, 90. 


chocoensis, Dasyprocta variegata, 82, 98. 


Cholcepus agustinus, 80, 96. 
andinus, 80, 96. 
capitalis, 80, 96. 
florencize, 80, 96. 
chonensis, Sigmodon, 80, 96. 
Chrotopterus carrikeri, 78, 95. 
chrysogaster, Lemmus obensis, 73, 92. 
chrysomelas, Oryzomys, 65, 88. 
Neotoma, 77, 94. 
chrysonotus, Vespertilio, 65, 88. 
cinerascens, Lepus, 59, 85. 
cinereicollis, Tamias, 59, 85. 
cinereiventer, Thomasomys, 79, 86. 
cineritius, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
cinnamomea, Neotoma, 64, 88. 
Ochotona, 76, 94. 
Citellus, buxtoni, 73, 92. 
grammurus rupestris, 73, 92. 
stejnegeri, 73, 92. 
stonei, 73, 92. . 
cocalensis, Rhipidomys, 79, 96. 
Coendou quichua richardsoni, 80, 96. 


Coendou sanctemarte, 75, 93. 

coibensis, Molossus, 74, 938. 

colborni, Ctenomys, 73, 92. 

colimz, Sigmodon, 65, 88. 

colombiana, Lutra, 75, 93. 

colombianus, Akodon, 68, 90. 
Metachirus nudicaudatus, 69, 

90. 

colombica, Didelphis karkinophaga, 69, 
90. 

columbianus, Oreamnos montanus, 74, 
92. 

conditi, Perognathus, 63, 87. 

Conepatus nicarague, 78, 95. 

confinis, Lepus arizone, 66, 89. 

consobrinus, Tamias minimus, 59, 85. 
Scotophilus castaneus, 76, 94. 

constablei, Phenacomys, 68, 89. 

coreanus, Ochotona, 79, 96. 

costaricensis, Blarina, 60, 86. 
Oryzomys, 62, 87. 
Reithrodontomys, 63, 87. 

couesi, Tylomys, 62, 86. 

Crocidura kijabe, 77, 95. 

Ctenomys colborni, 73, 92. 
osgoodi, 75, 94. 
robustus, 73, 92. 
sericeus, 73, 92. 

cucute, Sciurus gerrardi, 81, 97. 

Cynomys parvidens, 76, 94. 

dacotensis, Sciurus hudsonicus, 63, 87. 

Dactylomys peruanus, 69, 90. 

Dama lichtensteini, 71, 91. 

Dasyprocta fuliginosa candelensis, 82, 98. 
varlegata chocoensis, 82, 98. 
variegata urucuma, 82, 98. 
variegata zamorz, 82, 98. 

Dasypterus ega punensis, 81, 97. 

daulensis, Molossus, 83, 99. 
Sylvilagus, 81, 97. 

delicatus, Oryzomys, 65, 88. 

Dermonotus suarpurensis, 74, 95. 

deserti, Reithrodontomys megalotis, 63, 

87. 

Didelphis paraguayensis andina, 72, 91. 
karkinophaga cauce, 69, 90. 
karkinophaga colombica, 69, 90. 
marsupialis etensis, 72, 91. 
marsupialis insularis, 72, 91. 


104 


Didelphis paraguayensis meridensis, 72, 
91. 
richmondi, 70, 91. 
pernigra, 69, 90. 
marsupialis tabascensis, 70, 91. 
marsupialis texensis, 70, 91. 
yucatanensis, 70, 91. 
Didelphys canescens, 62, 87. 
difficilis, Vesperimus, 60, 86. 
Dipodops ordii palmeri, 60, 86. 
richardsoni, 60, 86. 
sennetti, 60, 86. 
dorsalis, Peramys brevicaudatus, 74, 93. 
dubius, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
duida, Callicebus lugens, 81, 97. 
Sciurus, 81, 97. 
durange, Eutamias, 73, 92. 
— Lepus, 73, 92. 
—— Myotis ealifornicus, 73, 92. 
Neotoma intermedia, 73, 92. 
dychei, Reithrodontomys, 63, 87. 
Echimys canicollis, 68, 90. 
mince, 68, 90. 
trinitatis, 62, 84. 
urichi, 68, 90. 
elene, Margay tigrina, 82, 98. 
Eligmodontia morgani, 70, 91. 
emiliz, Cicomys, 83, 99. 
engelhardti, Marmota, 76, 94. 
Eptesicus andinus, 81, 97. 
chapmani, 82, 98. 
eremicus, Lepus texianus, 63, 87. 
Erethizon godfreyi, 75, 938. 
epixanthus nigrescens, 73, 92. 
Erinaceus orientalis, 73, 92. 
escuinape, Heteromys pictus, 76, 94. 
Lynx ruffus, 73, 92. 
esmeraldze, Myotis, 81, 97. 
etensis, Didelphis marsupialis, 72, 91. 
Euneomys petersoni, 73, 92. 
Eunothocyon, 75, 84. 
Eutamias adsitus, 76, 94. 
albogularis, 77, 95. 
canescens, 74, 93. 
durange, 73, 92. 
lectus, 75, 94. 
Evotomys fuscodorsalis, 62, 68, 84. 
jochelsoni, 73, 92. 
letastei, 73, 92. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


exiguus, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
Felis carrikeri, 74, 93. 
maripensis, 74, 93. 
mearnsi, 74, 93. 
panamensis, 74, 93. 
sanctemarte, 74, 93. 
femoralis, Perognathus, 60, 86. 
figginsi, Ochotona, 79, 96. 
flaccidus, Peromyscus texanus, 73, 92. 


’ florencize, Cholcepus, 80, 96. 


Microsciurus, 81, 97. 

(Ecomys, 83, 98. 
floridanus, Lepus sylvaticus, 59, 85. 
fossor, Thomomys, 61, 88. 
frater, Tamias, 59, 85. 
fraterculus, Zygodontomys, 80, 97. 
frustrator, Akodon, 65, 88. 
fulvescens, Reithrodontomys mexicanus, 

63, 87. 

Sylvilagus, 79, 96. 
fulvirostris, Oryzomys, 79, 96. 
fulviventer, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 

Sigmodon, 58, 85. 
fumeus, Ototylomys, 77, 95. 
Funambulus ruidonensis, 76, 94. 
furvus, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
fusca, Chilonycteris rubiginosa, 78, 95. 
fuscata, Mazama, 82, 98. 
fuscatus, Aupeomys, 79, 96. 

Heteromys, 77, 94. 
fuscodorsalis, Evotomys, 62, 87. 
fuscogriseus, Metachirus, 69, 90. 
gabbi, Bassaricyon, 52, 84. 

Lepus brasiliensis, 55, 85. 
gaumeri, Adelonycteris, 66, 89. 
—_— Heteromys, O5.:66. 
Geomys cherriei, 62, 87. 
geronimensis, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 

Phoca richardii, 72, 91. 
gichiganus, Lepus, 73, 92. 
gichigensis, Phoca hispida, 72, 91. 
gilberti, Sitomys, 61, 86. 

Glossophaga apolinari, 82, 98. 
godfreyi, Erethizon, 75, 93. 
gracilis, Reithrodontomys 

65, 88. 

Tamias quadrivittatus, 59, 85. 
grahamensis, Sciurus hudsonicus, 63, 87. 
grangeri, Lepus sylvaticus, 64, 87. 


mexicanus, 


MAMMALS. 105 


grangeri, Neotoma, 63, 87. 

granti, Rangifer, 71, 91. 

graysoni, Lepus, 55, 85. 

Gressigrada, 83. 

griscescens, Metachirus, 70, 91. 

griselmembra, Guerlinguetus, 81, 97. 

griseus, Sigmodon hispidus, 77, 95. 
Zygodontomys, 80, 97. 

gualea, Mazama, 82, 98. 

Guerlinguetus candalensis, 81, 97. 
griseimembra, 81, 97. 
hoffmanni manavi, 81, 97. 


hoffmanni quindianus, 81, 97. 
pucherani salentensis, 81, 97. 


zestuans venustus, 82, 98. 
guiansz, Tapirus terrestris, 83, 99. 
Hadrosciurus, 82, 84. 
hainana, Ratufa gigantea, 76, 94. 
hainanus, Atherurus, 76, 94. 


Paradoxurus larvatus, 77, 95. 


Rhinolophus, 76, 94. 


Tamiops macclellandi, 76, 94. 


haitiensis, Ardops, 77, 94. 
hatcheri, Reithrodon, 73, 92. 
helvolus, Oryzomys, 80, 97. 
Hesperomys affinis, 60, 86. 

alfaroi, 60, 86. 

cherriei, 60, 86. 

nudipes, 60, 86. 
Heteromys pictus escuinape, 76, 94. 

fuscatus, 77, 94. 

gaumeri, 65, 68. 

hispidus, 65, 68. 

jaliscensis, 76, 94. 

jesupi, 68, 90. 

lomitensis, 79, 96. 

vuleani, 77, 94. 
Hipposideros poutensis, 76, 94. 
hispidus, Heteromys, 65, 88. 
Histiotus maculatus, 59, 86. 
Histriosciurus, 82, 84. 
Holochilus venezuelensis, 74, 93. 
Hoplomys, 77, 84. 

truei, 77, 94. 
huachuca, Sciurus hudsonicus, 63, 87. 
hypoleuca, Mycronycteris, 68, 90. 
impavidus, Canis, 73, 92. 
incautus, Vespertilio, 65, 88. 
incertus, Oryzomys alfaroi, 77, 94. 


incertus, Oryzomys, 80, 97. 
ingrahami, Capromys, 60, 86. 
inserta, Tayra barbara, 77, 95. 
insolitus, Lepus, 59, 85. 
insperatus, Arvicola, 63, 87. 
instabilis, Tamandua tetradactyla, 75, 
93. 
insularis, Artibeus, 74, 93. 
Didelphis marsupialis, 63, 87. 
Sciurus erythrzeus, 76, 94. 
Scotophilus kuhli, 76, 94. 
intermedia, Choeronycteris, 62, 86. 
intermedius, Artibeus, 65, 88. 
Reithrodontomys mexicanus, 
Oagaot 
irrara, Tayra barbara, 74, 93. 
irazu, Akodon, 74, 93. 
Isolobodon, 84, 98. 
portoricensis, 82, 92. 
Isothrix rufodordalis, 68, 90. 
jalapze, Mus musculus, 66, 89. 
Oryzomys, 66, 89. 
jaliscensis, Heteromys, 76, 94. 
jesup1, Chiroderma, 68, 90. 
Heteromys, 68, 90. 
jochelsoni, Evotomys, 73, 92. 
juliace, Oxymycteris, 69, 90. 
juruana, Mazama americana, 82, 98. 
keaysi, Myotis ruber, 81, 97. 
Oryzomys, 69, 91. 
Thylamys, 69, 90. 
kenaiensis, Ovis dalli, 72, 91. 
Ursus americanus, 78, 95. 
kermiti, Proechimys, 82, 98. 
kijabe, Crocidura, 77, 95. 
kijabeus, Mus, 77, 95. 
klagesi, Marmosa, 69, 90. 
kodiacensis, Spermophilus parryi, 51, 84. 
kolymensis, Ochotona, 73, 92. 
laceyl1, Reithrodontomys, 65, 88. 
lagunetz, Nasua olivacea, 80, 96. 
langi, Madoqua, 77, 95. 
latastei, Evotomys, 73, 92. 
latidens, Lutra, 77, 95. 
lectus, Eutamias, 76, 94. 
Lemmus obensis chrysogaster, 73, 92. 
Leptosciurus, 82, 84. 
Lepus sylvaticus arizone, 55, 85. 
aquaticus attwateri, 64, 88. 


106 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Lepus sylvilagus aztecus, 59, 85. 
gaillardi battyi, 73, 92. 
bishopi, 68, 90. 
cerrosensis, 66, 89. 
floridanus chapmani, 68, 90. 

- cinerascens, 59, 85. 
arizonz confinis, 66, 89. 
durange, 73, 92. 
texianus eremicus, 63, 87. 
sylvaticus floridanus, 59, 85. 
brasiliensis gabbi, 55, 85. 
gichiganus, 73, 92. 
sylvaticus grangeri, 64, 87. 
graysoni, 55, 895. 
insolitus, 59, 85. 
sylvaticus mearnsi, 62, 87. 
texianus micropus, 73, 92. 
parvulus, 74, 93. 
peninsularis, 66, 89. 


americanus phzonotus, 68, 90. 


sylvaticus pinetis, 63, 87. 
russatus, 74, 92. 
superciliaris, 68, 90. 
truei, 59, 85. 
gabbi tumacus, 77, 94. 
lichtensteini, Dama, 71, 91. 
lomitensis, Heteromys, 79, 96. 
Melanomys, 80, 96. 
Loncheres carrikeri, 78, 95. 
castaneus, 62, 87. 
Lonchophylla thomasi, 74, 93. 
longimembris, Ateles, 82, 98. 
lucopheus, Arvicola, 63, 87. 
luteiventris, Mus, 78, 95. 


———— Tamias quadrivittatus, 59, 85. 


lutescens, Akodon, 70, 91. 

Lutra colombiana, 75, 93. 
latidens, 77, 95. 

Lynx ruffus escuinape, 73, 92. 
texensis, 64, 87. 

macrodens, Phoca ochotensis, 72, 91. 

Macrogeomys matagalpe, 78, 95. 

maculatus, Histiotus, 59, 86. 

maculiventer, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 

Madoqua langi, 77, 95. 

magdalene, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
Sciurus saltuensis, 81, 97. 


manavl, Guerlinguetus hoffmanni, 81, 97. 


Manis pusilla, 76, 94. 


Margay caucensis, 82, 98. 
tigrina elenz, 82, 98. 


‘maripensis, Felis, 74, 93. 


Myotis, 81, 97. 
Marmosa chapmani, 69, 90. 
klagesi, 69, 90. 
sinaloze, 66, 89. 
Marmota engelhardti, 76, 94. 
martirensis, Sitomys, 61, 86. 
Thomomys fulvus, 66, 89. 
mascotensis, Sigmodon, 65, 88. 
matagalpz, Alouatta palliata, 77, 95. 
Sciurus deppei, 77, 95. 
Macrogeomys, 77, 95. 
mattogrosse, Oryzomys, 83, 99. 
Mazama fuscata, 82, 98. 
gualea, 82, 98. 
americana juruana, 82, 98. 
murelia, 82, 98. 
‘cita sanctemarte, 82, 98. 
americana tumatumari, 82, 98. 
trinitatis, 82, 98. 
zamora, 82, 98. 
mearnsi, Felis, 74, 93. 
Lepus sylvaticus, 62, 87. 
Perognathus, 65, 88. 
Vesperimus, 60, 86. 
melanogenys, Meles, 79, 96. 
Melanomys beunavistex, 80, 96. 
lomitensis, 80, 96. 
affinis monticola, 80, 96. 
caliginosus oroensis, 80, 96. 
pheopus tolimensis, 80, 96. 
phepus vallicola, 80, 96. 
melanotis, Peromyscus, 66, 89. 
Meles melanogenys, 79, 96. 
meridensis, Akodon, 74, 93. 
Didelphis paraguayensis, 72, 
91. 
merriami, Perognathus, 60, 86. 
Reithrodontomys, 63, 87. 
Tamias asiaticus, 58, 85. 
Ursus, 72, 91. 
Mesosciurus, 82, 84. 
gerrardi baudensis, 82, 98. 
gerrardi valdivia, 82, 98. 
Metachirus nudicaudatus antioquie, 82, 
98. 
nudicaudatus bolivianus, 70, 91. 


a ee ee 


MAMMALS. 


Metachirus nudicaudatus colombianus, 
69, 90. 

fuscogriseus, 69, 90. 

griscesens, 70, 91. 

fuscogriseus pallidus, 70, 91. 

tschudi, 69, 90. 
mexicanus, Oryzomys, 65, 88. 
Micronycteris hypoleuca, 68, 90. 
micropus, Lepus texianus, 73, 92. 
Oryzomys, 83, 99. 
Microxus affinis, 79, 96. 
Microsciurus, 64, 83. 

florenciz, 81, 97. 

rubrirostris, 81, 97. 
microtis, Oxymycteris, 73, 92. 

Putorius, 73, 92. 
Microtus cautus, 68, 89. 

stonei, 68, 89. 

vellerosus, 68, 89. 
milleri, Myoprocta, 80, 96. 
(Kcomys, 83, 99. 
Pithecia, 81, 98. 
Promops, 68, 90. 
Reithrodontomys, 79, 96. 
Rhipidomys, 80, 97. 
Sciurus, 79, 96. 
mince, Echimys, 68, 90. 

(Kcomys, 80, 97. 
Mississippiensis, Canis, 52, 84. 
missoulze, Oreamnos montanus, 74, 92. 
modesta, Tupaia, 76, 94. 
modestus, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
mollipilosus, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
mollissimus, Rhipidomys, 79, 96. 
Molossus bonde, 74, 93. 

cherriei, 83, 99. 

coibensis, 74, 93. 

daulensis, 83, 99. 

sinaloz, 76, 94. 

verrilli, 77, 94. 
monticola, Melanomys affinis, 80, 96. 
monticolus, Thomomys, 61, 86. 
morgani, Eligmodontia, 70, 91. 
Mormopterus peruanus, 81, 97. 
munchiquensis, Oryzomys, 79, 96. 
Mungos palawanus, 78, 95. 

rubrifrons, 77, 95. 
murelia, Mazama, 82, 98. 
Oryzomys, 82, 98. 


Mus andrewsi, 78, 95. 
buruensis, 78, 95. 
musculus jalapze, 66, 99. 
kajabius, 77, 95. 
luteiventris, 78, 95. 
Mustela tropicalis nicarague, 82, 98. 
Myoprocta milleri, 80, 96. 
Myotalpa rufescens, 77, 95. 
Myotis bond, 86, 97. 
caucensis, 86, 97. 
chiriquensis, 74, 93. 
ealifornicus durange, 73, 92. 
esmeralde, 86, 97. 
ruber keaysi, 86, 97. 
maripensis, 86, 97. 
nairobe, Arvicanthis, 77, 95. 
Nasua narica bullata, 74, 93. 
olivacea lagunetz, 80, 96. 
narica pallida, 74, 93. 
narica panamensis, 74, 93. 
phezocephala, 74, 93. 
narica yucatanica, 74, 93. 
nasutus, Vesperimus, 60, 96. 
Neacomys pusillus, 79, 96. 
nebrascensis, Reithrodontomys dychei, 
63, 87. 
Nectomys palmipes, 60, 86. 
neglectus, Tamias quadrivittatus, 59, 85. 
neomexicanus, Sciurus fremonti, 66, 89. 
Neotoma anthonyi, 66, 89. 
arenacea, 66, 99. 
campestris, 63, 87. 
micropus canescens, 60, 86. 
chrysomelas, 77, 94. 
cinnamomea, 64, 88. 
intermedia durange, 73, 92. 
grangeri, 63, 87. 
rupicola, 63, 87. 
sinaloz, 66, 89. 
nicarague, Conepatus, 78, 95. 
Oryzomys, 78, 95. 
Peromyscus, 77, 95. 
Mustela tropicalis, 82, 98. 
niger, Tayassu, 80, 96. 
nigrescens, Blarina, 64, 88. 
Erethizon epizanthus, 73, 92. 
Notosciurus, 81, 84. 
rhoadsi, 81, 97. 
nudipes, Hesperomys, 60, 86. 


108 


Nyctinomus exquatorialis, 81, 97. 
obscurus, Reithrodon cuniculoides, 73, 
92. 

Perodipus, 73, 92. 

Tamias, 59, 85. 
obtusirostris, Oryzomys, 69, 91. 
Ochotona cinnamomea, 76, 94. 

coreanus, 79, 96. 

figginsi, 79, 96. 

kolymensis, 73, 92. 
ochraceus, Oryzomys, 77, 94. 
ochrogaster, Rhipidomys, 70, 91. 
o’connelli, Oryzomys, 80, 97. 

Proechimys, 80, 96. 
Odobeenide, 50, 83. 

Odocoileus battyi, 73, 92. 
sinaloz, 73, 92. 

(Kcomys caicare, 81, 90. 
emiliz, 83, 99. 
florenciz, 83, 99. 
milleri, 83, 99. 
minca, 81, 90. 

olivaceus, Blarina, 77, 95. 
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, 

64, 88. 
Oncoides pardalis tumatumari, 82, 98. 
Oreamnos montanus columbianus, 74, 
92. 

montanus missoule, 74, 92. 
orientalis, Erinaceus, 73, 92. 
oroensis, Melanomys caliginosus, 80, 96. 
orophila, Blarina, 64, 88. 

Oryzomys obscurior affinis, 79, 96. 
aquaticus, 60, 86. 
barbacoas, 82, 98. 
baroni, 66, 89. 
baueri, 60, 86. 
bolivaris, 70, 91. 
brevicauda, 62, 87. 
bulleri, 65, 88. 
carrikeri, 77, 94. 
castaneus, 70, 91. 
cherriei, 64, 88. 
chrysomelas, 65, 88. 
costaricensis, 62, 87. 
delicatus, 65, 88. 
fulvirostris, 79, 96. 
fulviventer, 68, 90. 
helvolus, 81, 97. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Oryzomys alfaroi incertus, 77, 94. 

incertus, 86, 97. 
jalapz, 66, 89. 
keaysi, 69, 91. 
maculiventer, 68, 90. 
magdalenz, 68, 90. 
mattogrosse, 83, 99. 
mexicanus, 65, 88. 
microtis, 83, 98. 
modestus, 68, 90. 
mollipilosus, 68, 90. 
munchiquensis, 79, 96. 
murelie, 82, 98. 
nicarague, 77, 95. 
obtusirostris, 69, 91. 
ochraceus, 77, 94. 
o’connelli, 81, 97. 
palmarius, 68, 90. 
palmire, 79, 96. 
palustris texensis, 62, 87. 
pectoralis, 79, 96. 
perenensis, 70, 91. 
richardsoni, 77, 95. 
rivularis, 70, 91. 
sanctemarte, 68, 90. 
speciosus, 62, 87. 
talamance, 60, 86. 
tenuicauda, 68, 90. 
tenuipes, 74, 93. 
trichurus, 68, 90. 
trinitatis, 62, 87. 
utiaritensis, 83, 99. 
velutinus, 62, 87. 
villosus, 68, 90. 
vincencianus, 86, 97. 

osborni, Rangifer, 72, 91. 

osgoodi, Ctenomys, 75, 94. 
Amorphochilus schnablii, 81,. 

97. 

osilee, Phyllotis, 70, 91. 

Ototylomys fumeus, 77, 95. 

Ouliphocine, 50, 83. 

Ovis dalli kenaiensis, 72, 91. 
stonei, 65, 88. 
storchi, 74, 93. 

owstoni, Sciurotamias, 77, 95. 

Oxymycterus apicalis, 69, 91. 
juliaca, 69, 90. 
microtis, 73, 92. 


MAMMALS. 


‘Pachycyon, 58, 83. 
robustus, 58, 838. 
palawanus, Mungos, 78, 95. 
-pallescens, Peromyscus michiganensis, 
65, 88. 
pallida, Nasua narica, 74, 93. 
‘pallidus, Metachirus fuscogriseus, 70, 91. 
— — Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, 
51, 84. 
Tamias quadrivittatus, 51, 84. 
palmarius, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
-palmarum, Artibeus, 65, 88. 
palmeri, Dipodops ordii, 6C, 86. 
‘palmipes, Nectomys, 62, 87. 
-palmire, Oryzomys, 79, 96. 
-panamensis, Felis, 74, 93. 
Phyllostoma hastatus, 74, 93. 
Nasua narica, 74, 93. 
Paradoxurus larvatus hainanus, 77, 95. 
Paralces, 72, 84. 
-parvidens, Cynomys, 76, 94. 
parvulus, Lepus, 74, 93. 
-parvus, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, 
64, 88. 
paulus, Peromyscus, 73, 92. 
-pearyl, Rangifer, 72, 91. 
‘pectoralis, Oryzomys, 79, 96. 
-~peninsulz, Tamias leucurus, 61,86. 
peninsularis, Lepus, 66, 89. 
Peramys brevicaudatus dorsalis, 74, 93. 
perenensis, Oryzomys, 70, 91. 
-perriger, Ursus americanus, 78, 95. 
pernigra, Didelphia, 69, 90. 
-pernix, Perognathus, 66, 89. 
Perodipus obscurus, 73, 92. 
Perognathus conditi, 63, 87. 
femoralis, 60, 86. 
mearnsi, 65, 88. 
merriami, 60, 86. 
pernix, 66, 89. 
pricei, 63, 87. 
Peromyscus attwateri, 64, 68. 
banderanus, 65, 68. 
musculus brunneus, 66, 89. 
cedrosensis, 66, 89. _ 
cineritius, 66, 89. 
dubius, 66, 89. 
exiguus, 66, 89. 
texanus flaccidus, 73, 92. 


109 


Peromyscus furvus, 66, 89. 
geronimensis, 66, 89. 
melanotis, 66, 89. 
nicarague, 77, 95. 
michiganensis pallescens, 65, 88. 
paulus, 73, 92. 
eremicus propinquus, 66, 89. 
spicilegus, 65, 68. 
texanus subarcticus, 68, 90. 
yucatanicus, 65, 68. 

peruanus, Dactylomys, 69, 90. 

Mormopterus, 81, 97. 

Sciurus, 66, 88. 

Sigmodon, 66, 89. 

petersoni, Euneomys, 73, 92. 

pheeocephala, Nasua, 74, 93. 

phezonotus, Lepus americanus, 68, 90. 

pheurus, Sciurus aberti, 74, 93. 

Phenacomys constablei, 68, 89. 
truei, 63, 87. 

Phoca richardii geronimensis, 72, 91. 
hispida gichigensis, 72, 91. 
ochotensis macrodens, 72, 91. 
richardii pribilofensis, 72, 91. 
stejnegeril, 72, 91. 

Phyllostoma hastatus caure, 74, 93. 
hastatus panamensis, 74, 93. 

Phyllotis cachinus, 70, 91. 
chacoensis, 70, 91. 
osile, 70, 91. 

pictus, Tamias minimus, 59, 85. 

pinetis, Lepus sylvaticus, 63, 87. 

Pipistrellus portensis, 76, 94. 

Pithecia milleri, 81, 98. 

popayanus, Thomasomys, 79, 96. 

portensis, Pipistrellus, 76, 94. 

portoricensis, Isolobodon, 83. 

Potos flavus caucensis, 74, 93. 
flavus chapadensis, 74, 93. 
flavus chiriquensis, 74, 93. 
flavus tolimensis, 80, 96. 

poutensis, Hipposideros, 76, 94. 

pribilofensis, Phoca richardii, 72, 91. 

pricei, Perognathus, 63, 87. 

— Tamias, 64, 88. 

princeps, Zapus, 61, 86. 

Procyon equatorialis, 82, 98. 
proteus, 74, 93. 

Proechimys, 68, 84. 


110 


Proechimys boimensis, 83, 98. 
kermiti, 82, 98. 
o’connelli, 80, 96. 
Promops affinis, 68, 90. 
barbatus, 74, 93. 
milleri, 68, 90. 
propinquus, Peromyscus eremicus, 66, 
89. 
proteus, Procyon, 74, 93. 
puna, Sigmodon, 73, 92. 
punensis, Dasypterus ega, 81, 97. 
Myotis, 81, 97. 
Tamandua tetradactyla, 82, 
98. 
pusilla, Manis, 76, 94. 
pusillus, Neacomys, 79, 96. 
Putorius microtus, 73, 92. 
pygmeus, 73, 92. 
pygmeus, Putorius, 73, 92. 
quebradensis, Sciurus, 68, 90. 
quindianus, Guerlinguetus hoffmanni, 
81, 97. 
Rhipidomys, 81, 97. 
Rangifer granti, 71, 91. 
osborni, 72, 91. 
pearyl, 72, 91. 
stonei, 70, 91. 
terranove, 65, 88. 
Ratufa gigantea hainana, 76, 94. 
Reithrodon hatcheri, 73, 92. 
cuniculoides obscurus, 73, 92. 
Reithrodontomys arizonensis, 63, 87. 
mexicanus aurantius, 63, 87. 
australis, 64, 88. 
aztecus, 61, 86. 
megalotis deserti, 63, 87. 
dychei, 63, 87. 
costaricensis, 63, 87. 
mexicanus fulvescens, 61, 87. 
mexicanus gracilis, 65, 68. 
mexicanus intermedius, 63, 87. 
laceyi, 65, 88. 
merriami, 63, 87. 
milleri, 79, 96. 
dychei nebrascensis, 63, 87. 
rufescens, 66, 89. 
saturatus, 66, 89. 
megalotis sestinensis, 73, 92. 
tenuis, 68, 90. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Reptigrada, 83. 
Rhinolophus hainanus, 76, 94. 
Rhipidomys caucensis, 80, 97. 
cocalensis, 79, 96. 
milleri, 80, 97. 
mollissimus, 79, 96. 
ochrogaster, 70, 91. 
quindianus, 80, 97. 
similis, 79, 96. 
venezuelz yuruanus, 80, 97. 
rhoadsi, Notosciurus, 81, 97. 
richardsoni, Artibeus jamaicensis, 77, 95. 
Bassaricyon, 77, 95. 
Coendou quichua, 80, 96. 
Dipidops, 60, 86. 
Oryzomys, 77, 95. 
richmondi, Didelphis, 70, 91. 
riudonensis, Funambulus, 76, 94. 
riudoni, Tamiops macclellandi, 76, 94. 
rivularis, Oryzomys, 70, 91. 
robustus, Ateles, 81, 98. 
Ctenomys, 73, 92. 
Pachycyon, 58, 85. 
Sitomys, 62, 87. 
roosevelti, Cacajao, 81, 98. 
rowleyi, Sitomys, 61, 86. 
rubicunda, Alouatta seniculus, 75, 93. 
rubrifrons, Mungos, 77, 95. 
rubrirostris, Microsciurus, 80, 97. 
rufescens, Myotalpa, 77, 95. 
Reithrodontomys, 66, 89. 
rufodorsalis, Isothrix, 68, 90. 
rupestris, Citellus grammurus, 73, 92. 
rupicola, Neotoma, 63, 87. 
rusbyi, Artibeus, 74, 93. 
russatus, Lepus, 74, 92. 
Saimiri caquetensis, 82, 98. 
salaquensis, Sciurus gerrardi, 81, 97. 
salentensis, Guerlinguetus pucheranii, 
iA 
salentus, Sylvilagus, 80, 96. 
saltator, Zapus, 68, 89. 
sanctemartz, Coendou, 74, 93. 
Felis, 74, 93. 

—— Mazama cita, 82, 98. 
Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
saturatus, Reithrodontomys, 66, 89. 

sauteri, Tamiops, 78, 95. 
Scalops argentatus texanus, 60, 86. 


MAMMALS. 


Scapanus anthonyi, 61, 86. 
Sciurotamias owstoni, 77, 95. 
Sciurus douglasii albolimbatus, 66, 89. 
alfari, 64, 88. 
alstoni, 58, 85. 
apache, 61, 86. 
hudsonicus baileyi, 66, 89. 
aberti barberi, 74, 90. 
beebei, 78, 95. 
saltuensis bonde, 68, 90. 
hudsonius californicus, 59, 85. 
campestris, 63, 87. 
douglasii cascadensis, 66, 89. 
cervicalis, 59, 85. 
chapmani, 68, 90. 
gerrardi cucute, 81, 97. 
duida, 81, 97. 
hudsonicus grahamensis, 63, 87. 
arizonensis huachuca, 63, 87. 
erythreeus insularis, 76, 94. 
saltuensis magdalene, 81, 97. 
deppei matagalpex, 77, 95. 
milleri, 79, 96. 
fremonti neomexicanus, 66, 89. 
peruanus, 66, 88. 
aberti phzeurus, 74, 93. 
quebradensis,’ 68, 90. 
gerrardi salaquensis, 81, 97. 
langsdorffi steinbachi, 81, 97. 
hudsonicus streatori, 66, 88. 
poliopus tepicanus, 76, 94. 
langsdorfhi urucumus, 81, 97. 
hudsonius vancouverensis, 59, 
85. 
hudsonicus ventorum, 66, 88. 
wagneri, 67, 89. 
igniventris zamore, $1, 97. 
zarume, 81, 97. 
sclateri, Canis, 75, 94. 
Scotophilus castaneus consobrinus, 76, 
94. 
kuhli, 76, 94. 
senex, Tamias, 59, 85. 
senilis, Tayra barbara, 80, 96. ' 
sennetti, Dipodops, 60, 86. 
sericeus, Ctenomys, 73, 92. 
sestinensis, Reithrodontomys megalotis, 
13; 92. 
Sigmodon baileyi, 73, 92. 


111 


Sigmodon baroni, 66, 89. 
bogotensis, 66, 88. 
boruce, 65, 88. 
boruce chiriquensis, 74, 93. 
chonensis, 80, 96. 
colime, 65, 88. 
fulviventer, 58, 85. 
hispidus griseus, 77, 95. 
mascotensis, 65, 88. 
peruana, 66, 88. 
puna, 73, 92. 
simonsi, 69, 91. 
vulcani, 76, 94. 
Sigmodontomys, 65, 84, 88. 
alfari, 65, 84, 88. 
similis, Rhipidomys, 79, 96. 
simonsi, Sigmodon, 69, 91. 
Simosciurus, 82, 84. 
sinaloze, Marmosa, 66, 89. 
Molossus, 76, 94. 
Neotoma, 66, 89. 
— Odocoileus, 73, 92. 
Sitomys americanus arizone, 63, 87. 
auripectus, 61, 86. 
gilberti, 61, 86. 
robustus, 62, 87. 
rowleyi, 61, 86. 
americanus thurberi, 61, 86. 
Sorex buxtoni, 73, 92. 
speciosus, Oryzomys, 62, 87. 
Spermophilus parryi kodiacensis, 51, 84. 
tridecemlineatus olivaceus, 64, 
88. 
tridecemlineatus pallidus, 51, 
84. 
tridecemlineatus parvus, 64, 88. 
spicilegus, Peromyscus, 65, 88. 
Squalodon tiedemani, 58, 85. 
Squamipes, Blarina, 79, 96. 
steinbachi, Sciurus langsdorfhi, 81, 97. 
stejnegeri, Citellus, 73, 92. 
Oca 25-9 
stonei, Citellus, 73, 92. 
Microtus, 68, 89. 
Ovis, 65, 88. 
Rangifer, 70, 91. 
storcki, Ovis, 74, 93. 
streatori, Sciurus hudsonicus, 66, 89. 
suarpurensis, Dermonotus, 74, 93. 


112 


subarcticus, Peromyscus texanus, 68, 90. 
superciliaris, Lepus, 68, 90.  . 
Sylvilagus boyleyi, 82, 98. 

daulensis, 81, 97. 

fulvescens, 81, 97. 

salentus, 80, 96. 

Synaptomys andersoni, 73, 92. 
chapmani, 73, 92. 
tabascensis, Didelphis marsupialis, 70, 

91. 
talamance, Oryzomys, 60, 86. 
Tamandua tetradactyla chapadensis, 75, 
93. 
tetradactyla chiriquensis, 75, 
93. 
tetradactyla instabilis, 75, 93. 
tetradactyla punensis, 82, 98. 
tetradactyla tenuirostris, 75, 93. 
Tamias quadrivittatus affinis, 59, 85. 
amocenus, 59, 85. 
asiaticus borealis, 55, 85. 
asiaticus bulleri, 58, 85. 
cinereicollis, 59, 865. 
minimus consobrinus, 59, 85. 
frater, 59, 85. 
quadrivittatus gracilis, 59, 865. 
asiaticus merriami, 58, 85. 
quadrivittatus neglectus, 59, 
85. 
obscurus, 59, 85. 
quadrivittatus pallidus, 51, 84. 
leucurus peninsule, 61, 86. 
minimus pictus, 59, 865. 
pricei, 64, 88. 
wortmani, 64, 88. 
Tamiops, 76, 84. 
macclellandi hainanus, 76, 94. 
macclellandi ruidoni, 76, 94. 
sauteri, 78, 95. 
tapirapoanus, Zygodontomys, 83, 99. 
Tapirus terrestris guianz, 83, 99. 
Tayassu niger, 80, 96. 
Tayra barbara inserta, 77, 95. 
barbara irara, 74, 93. 
barbara senilis, 80, 96. 
tenuicauda, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
tenuipes, Oryzomys, 74, 93. 
tenuirostris, Tamandua tetradactyla, 72, 
93. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


tenuis, Reithrodontomys, 68, 90. 
tepicanus, Sciurus poliopus, 76, 94. 
terrenove, Rangifer, 65, 88. 
texanus, Scalops argentatus, 60, 86. 
texensis, Didelphis marsupialis, 70, 91. 
Lynx, 64, 87. 
Oryzomys palustris, 62, 97. 


thomasi, Lonchophylla, 74, 93. 


Zygodontomys, 69, 91. 
Thomasomys fulvus alticolus, 68, 90. 
fulvus anite, 66, 84. 
atrovarius, 66, 89. 
aureus altorum, 81, 97. 
aureus, 61, 86. 
cervinus, 64, 87. 
cinereiventer, 79, 96. 
fossor, 61, 86. 
fulvus martirensis, 66, 89. 
monticolus, 61, 86. 
popayanus, 79, 96. 
toltecus, 61, 86. 
Thrinacodus apolinari, 81, 97. 
thurberi, Sitomys americanus, 61, 86. 
Thylamys carri, 65, 88. 
keaysi, 69, 90. 
tiedemani, Squalodon, 58, 85. 
tjaderi, Tragelaphus, 77, 95. 
tolime, Akodon, 80, 96. 
Melanomys phzopus, 80, 96. 
tolimensis, Potos flavus, 80, 96. 
toltecus, Thomomys, 61, 86. 
Tragelaphus tjaderi, 77, 95. 
Trichophocine, 83. 
trichurus, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 
trinitatis, Echimys, 62, 87. 
Mazama, 82, 98. 
Oryzomys, 62, 87. 
truei, Hoplomys, 77, 94. 
Lepus, 59, 85. 
Phenacomys, 61, 87. 
tschudi, Metachirus, 69, 90. 
tucumanensis, Akodon, 70, 91. 
tumacus, Lepus gabbi, 77, 94. 
tumatumari, Mazama, 82, 98. 
Oncoides pardalis, 82, 98. 
Tupaia modesta, 76, 94. 
Tylomys couesi, 62, 87. 
umbrinus, Tamias, 59, 85. 
urichi, Akodon, 65, 88. 


MAMMALS. 


urichi, Echimys, 68, 90. 
Urocyon cinereoargentea venezuele, 78, 
95. 
Urosciurus, 82, 84. 
Ursus americanus kenaiensis, 78, 95. 
merriami, 72, 91. 
americanus pernigra, 78, 95. 
utiaritensis, Oryzomys, 83, 99. 
urucuma, Dasyprocta variegata, 82, 98. 
urucumus, Sciurus langsdorfhi, 81, 97. 
valdivia, Mesosciurus gerrardi, 82, 98. 


vallicola, Melanomys phzopus, 80, 96. — 


vancouverensis, Sciurus hudsonius, 59, 
85. 
velifer, Vespertilio, 59, 85. 
vellerosus, Microtus, 68, 89. 
velutinus, Oryzomys, 62, 87. 
venezuele, Cavia porcella, 78, 95. 
Urocyon cinereoargentea, 78, 
95. 
venezuelensis, Akodon, 68, 90. 
Holochilus, 74, 93. 
ventorum, Sciurus hudsonicus, 66, 89. 
venustus, Guerlinguetus estuans, 82, 98. 
verrilli, Molossus, 76, 94. 
Vesperimus difficilis, 60, 86. 
mearnsi, 60, 86. 


113 


Vespertilio chrysonotus, 65, 88. 
incautus, 65, 88. 
velifer, 59, 85. 

villosus, Oryzomys, 68, 90. 

vulcani, Heteromys, 77, 94. 

— Sigmodon, 76, 94. 


- Vulpes anadyrensis, 73, 92. 


wagneri, Sciurus, 67, 89. 
whitei, Arctictis, 78, 95. 
whitneyi, Cervus, 52, 84. 
wortmani, Tamias, 64, 88. 
yucatanensis, Didelphis, 70, 91. 
yucatanica, Nasua narica, 74, 93. 
yucatanicus, Artibeus, 74, 93. 
Peromyscus, 65, 88. 
yuruanus, Rhipidomys, 80, 97. 
zamora, Mazama, 82, 98. 
zamore, Dasyprocta variegata, 82, 98. 
—— Sciurus igniventris, 81, 97. 
Zapus princeps, 61, 86. 

saltator, 68, 89. 
zarume, Sciurus stramineus, 81, 97. 
Zygodontomys, 83. 

fraterculus, 86, 97. 

griseus, 86, 97. 

tapirapoanus, 83, 99. 

thomasi, 69, 91. 


? 


a Ne 
sr yay 
sera 

pen, 2 


* ey 


BIRDS. ul ess 


Dey eB Es: 
1860-62. 


1. Birds of New England. <New England Farmer (weekly), for Aug. 11, 25, Sept. 
22, Oct. 6, 20, Nov. 3, 17, Dec. 1, 22, 1860; Jan. 5, 26, March 2, May 18, 
June 15, July 20, Sept. 21, Oct. 26, Nov. 23, 1861; April 26, July 26, Aug. 16, 
Sept. 18, Oct. 18, 25, Nov. 8, Dec. 6, 1862. Also, published in the same 
newspaper (monthly), large 8vo, for Sept., Oct., Nov., Dec., 1861, January, 
March, May, June, July, Sept., Nov., Dec., 1862, and Jan., 1863. 


‘Twenty-five articles in all, taking the birds of New England in order from Accipitres 
to the middle of the Fringillide. Popular biographical accounts, written to interest farmers 
in the feathered life of their fields.”,— (Coues, ‘Bibliography of North American Orni- 
thology,’ in ‘Birds of the Colorado Valley,’ 1878, p. 661.) 


1864. 


2. Catalogue of the Birds found at Springfield, Mass., with Notes on their Migra- 
tions, Habits, etc.; together with a List of those Birds found in the State not 
yet observed at Springfield. < Proc. Essex Inst., IV, art. iv, pp. 48-98, August, 


1864. 

“195 spp. at Springfield; 296 in Massachusetts, of which 131 breed, 28 are resident, 
67 winter visitors, 75 migrants, 106 summer visitors, 35 stragglers.’’— (Coues, lI. c., p. 
667.) 


1865. 


3. Notes on the Habits and Distribution of the Duck Hawk, or American Peregrine 
Falcon (Falco peregrinus), in the Breeding Season, and Description of the 
Eggs [from Mt. Tom, Mass.].<Pros. Essex Inst., IV, (for 1864) 1865, art. x, 
pp. 153-161. (Communicated Nov. 14, 1864.) 


1867. 
4. Winter Notes of an Ornithologist.< Amer. Nat., I, pp. 38-48, March, 1867. 


Relates to the winter birds of Massachusetts — 55 to 60 spp., consisting mainly of per- 
manent residents and visitors from the North. Comment on their manner of occurrence 


and relative abundance. 


5. The Birds of Spring. < Amer. Nat., I, pp. 141-144, May, 1867. 
Relates mainly to New England — 280 species there at the season named; contains a 
tabular summary. 


6. Ornithological Calendars [for March, April, and May].<Amer. Nat., I, p. 54 
[for March], p. 109 [for April], p. 160 [for May], March—May, 1867. 


Dates of usual appearance of migratory birds in Massachusetts in the spring months. 


1868. 


7. Notes on Birds observed in Western Iowa, in the months of July, August and 
September; also on birds observed in Northern Illinois in May and June, and 


116 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


at Richmond, Wayne Co., Indiana, between June third and tenth.<Mem. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., I, pt. iv, art. xii, pp. 488-526, Dec., 1868 (read June, 
1868). 


““Very full: includes some critical commentary on geographical distribution in general, 
and on relationships of certain disputed species. Iowa, 108 spp.; Illinois, a, Ogle Co., 84 spp.; 
b, Cook Co., 94 spp., with monographic account of certain Turdidze; Indiana, 72; the anno- 
tations in each case chiefly field-notes. 

“**Range in the breeding-season must form the basis for defining the limits of different 
ornithological districts....Among migrants of the same species the examples which arrive 
in the spring the earliest are bigger and more brightly tinted than those which come later, 
and, conversely, on their return the examples last seen are bigger than the summer specimens.’ 
Hence it would appear that the largest individuals are those which go furthest north in 
summer, and, he also adds, are those which live further north in winter. Some characteristics 
of the ornithological provinces of North America are next briefly mentioned; and then 
follow the lists of species observed, as stated in the title. In Iowa about 108 or 110 species 
were seen, of which at least 100 breed in the State. For Illinois two lists are given, one of 
84 species in Ogle County, the other of 94 species in Cook County. At Richmond 72 
species were observed by himself and Dr. Haymond. Some critical notes on supposed 
species (Turdide, Laridee) are added in the course of the paper.’— Coues, l. c., p. 676, 
quoting A. Newton, Zool. Rec. for 1868, p. 676. 


8. [Abstract of a paper on the Birds of Iowa and Illinois, with special reference to 
their migration.] <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., X11, 1868, p. 85. 


See the full memoir cited above, No. 7. 


9. Circular in reference to obtaining data concerning the distribution of North 
American birds in the breeding season.<Ann. Report Trustees of Mus. 
Comp. Zodlogy for 1868 (1869), pp. 26-27. 


Originally issued June 4, 1868. Signed L. Agassiz, but instigated and written by 
J. A. Allen. 


9a. Notes on the Red and Mottled Owls.<Amer. Nat., II, pp. 327-329, August, 
1868. 
On the red and gray phases of Scops asio, and incidental reference to the question of 


whether there is more than a single species of the genus Scops in North America. 


10. The “Dwarf Thrush” again. < Amer. Nat., II, pp. 488-489, Nov., 1868. 


With reference to a former article in this journal by E. A. Samuels on this subject. 


11. ‘Natural History of Birds.’<Amer. Nat., II, pp. 554-555, Dec., 1868. 
Review of Miss Grace Anna Lewis’s work of this title (12mo, Philadelphia, 1868). 


1869. 


12. Philadelphia Vireo and Yellow-bellied Flycatcher.< Amer. Nat., III, p. 504, 
Nov., 1869. 


Brief history of these two species, in reply to inquiries of a correspondent (W. L. T., 
Minneapolis, Minn.). 


1869-70. 


13. Notes on some of the Rarer Birds of Massachusetts.< Amer Nat., III, Dec., 
1869, pp. 505-519; Jan. and Feb., 1870, pp. 568-585, 631-648. 

“315 species (cf. footnote, p. 647) in Massachusetts. The paper is supplementary to the 

author’s Massachusetts catalogue published five years before in Proc. Essex Inst.; it contains 


critical comments on the rarer or less generally known species, and discusses the cases of some 
doubtful ones. The supposed Buteo ‘cooperi’ proved to be lineatus.’’— (Coues, I. c., p. 682.) 


rid. 


15. 


16. 


17. 


18. 


19. 


20. 


ZL. 


22. 


BIRDS. dele? 


1870. 


Occurrence of the Brown Pelican [Pelecanus fuscus] in Massachusetts. <A mer. 
Nat., IV, p. 58, March, 1870. 


What is the ‘‘ Washington Eagle”? <Amer. Nat., IV, pp. 524-527, Nov. 1870. 


Identified as the young of Haliaétus leucocephalus. 


Catalogue of the Birds of Iowa. < White’s Geolog. Survey of Iowa, Vol. II, 1870, 
Appendix B, pp. 419-427. (Des Moines, Iowa, 8vo, pp. vili, 443.) 


‘*Nominal list of 283 spp., those actually observed to breed within the limits of the State 
being marked with asterisk. A few of the species are to be regarded rather as stragglers, 
chiefly winter visitors from the North; some, however, from the West and South.’’— (Coues, 
Lacy. G82.) 


Summer Red Bird [Pyranga estiva]. Amer. Nat., IV, p. 56, March, 1870. 


Its occurrence at Amherst, Mass. 


The Ruby-crowned Kinglet. Amer. Nat., IV, p. 54, March, 1870. 


The red crown-patch absent in the female. 


1871. 


The Fauna of the Prairies [of the United States].< Amer. Nat., V, pp. 4-9, 
March, 1871. 


Mention of various birds, p. 6. 


Classification of Water Birds.< Amer. Nat., IV, pp. 746-752, Feb., 1871. 


An extended synoptical review of Dr. E. Coues’s paper on this subject (Proc. Acad. Nat. 
Sci. Philadelphia, 1869, pp. 193-218). 


The Migration of Hawks. <Amer. Nat., V, p. 173, May, 1871. 


Confirmation of Dr. William Wood’s observations (Amer. Nat., Feb. 1871, p. 759) on the 
migration of hawks, namely in loose straggling flocks. 


On the Mammals and Winter Birds of East Florida, with an Examination of 
certain assumed Specific Characters in Birds, and a Sketch of the Bird- 
Faunz of Eastern North America. <Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodél., II, No. 3, 
pp. 161-450, pll. iv—viii, April, 1871. 


**Part I, The Topographical, Climatic and Faunal characteristics of Kast Florida. (Part 
II, On Mammals.) Part III, On Individual and Geographical Variation among Birds, con- 
sidered in respect to its bearing upon the value of certain assumed specific characters — a 
highly important philosophic treatise upon the general subject, which is discussed at length 
with force and logical consistency; the author’s broad views upon this subject had at once a 
marked influence upon ornithological thought. Variation in general size and proportion of 
parts, both individual and climatic, are illustrated with numerous tables of measurements. 
An essay on species and varieties follows. Part IV, List of the Winter Birds of East Florida, 
with annotations,— field-notes, measurements, and much synonymy and technical criticism. 
Part V, On the Geographical Distribution of the Birds of Eastern North America, with 
special reference to the number and circumscription of the Ornithological Faune. After 
general introductory remarks, the natural Provinces of the North American Temperate 
Region are discussed, and the Ornithological Faune of the Eastern Provinces are treated. 
The following Faune are laid down and characterized: —1. Floridan. 2. Louisianian. 
3. Carolinian. 4. Alleghanian. 5. Canadian. 6. Hudsonian. 7. American Arctic. 
Various tabular summaries follow, with general remarks on the distribution and migration 


118 


23. 


24. 


25. 


26. 


27. 


28. 


29. 


30. 


31. 


32. 


B36 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


of the birds of the Eastern Province. A copious bibliography of American Ornithological 
literature concludes. The plates illustrate the variation in the bill of many species. The 
article gained the Humboldt Scholarship, and is one of the most important of American 
ornithological works. Cf. Ibis, 1872, pp. 189-191; Zool. Rec. for 1871, pp. 24, 25; Am. Nat., 
V, 1871, pp. 364-373.’’"— (Coues, l. c., p. 686.) 


1872. 


Birds of Kansas. < Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 359-360, June, 1872. 


Review of first edition of F. H. Snow’s Birds of Kansas (8vo, 1872, pp. 8), calling attention 
to errors and adding 18 species to the list. 


Prof. Snow’s List of Kansas Birds. <Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 483-484, August, 1872. 
In reply to criticism by Dr. T. M. Brewer of the former notice of the first edition of Prof. 
Snow’s list. (Cf. supra, No. 23.) 


Birds of Kansas. < Amer. Nat., VI, p. 765, Dec., 1872. 


Notice of the second edition of F. H. Snow’s List of Kansas Birds. (8vo, pp. 16, Oct. 
1872). Commended as ‘“‘a highly valuable and creditable list of the Birds of Kansas.’’ 


Geographical Variation in North American Birds. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 
XV, pp. 212-219, Dec., 1872. 


In amplification of a previous verbal communication. (Reprinted in Amer. Nat., VIII, 
pp. 534-541, Sept. 1874.) 


Notes on the Natural History of Fort Macon, N. C., and Vicinity. <Amer. Nat., 


VI, pp. 546-549, Sept., 1872. 
A review of E. Coues’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1871, pp. 12-49, 120- 
148. 


The Birds of the Tres Marias and Socorro Islands.< Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 681— 


682, Nov., 1872. 
A review of A. J. Grayson’s paper (edited by G. N. Lawrence), in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., XIV, 1872, pp. 261-303. 


Ornithological Works in Prospect.<Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 478-482, Aug., 1872. 


Anticipatory notices of E. Coues’s ‘Key to North American Birds,’ ‘Birds of North 
America,’ by S. F. Baird, T. M. Brewer, and R. Ridgway, and of C. J. Maynard’s ‘Birds of 


Florida.’ 


Ornithological Blunders.<Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 303-304, May, 1872. (Anon- 
ymous.) 
Comment on the case of Bonasa jobsii Jaycox, suggesting palliating circumstances. 


[Geographical Variation in North American Birds.]<Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., XV, 1872, pp. 156-159. (An editorial abstract is given in Amer. Nat., 


VIII, 1874, pp. 534-541). 


Catalogue of the Penguins in the Museum of the Boston Society of Natural 
History.< Amer. Nat., VI, pp. 545-546, Sept., 1872. 
A review of A. Hyatt’s paper (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XIV, 1872, pp. 237-251). 


Notes of an Ornithological Reconnaissance of Portions of Kansas, Colorado, 
Wyoming, and Utah.<Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., III, No. 6, pp. 113-183, 
July 10, 1872. 


34. 


30. 


36. 


37. 


38. 


39. 


40. 


41. 


42. 


BIRDS. 119 


“After general introductory, the author gives: —1. List of Birds observed at. Fort 
Leavenworth and Topeka, Kansas, spring of 1871 (121 spp.); 2. At Fort Hays, Kansas, 
May-July, 1871 (61 spp.); 3. In Northwestern Kansas, Dec. 1871, Jan., 1872 (25 spp.); 
4. At Cheyenne, Wyoming, Aug. 1871 (41 spp.); 5. In Colorado, July—August, 1871 
(81 spp.); 6. In South Park, Colorado, July, 1871 (54 spp.); 7. On Mount Lincoln, 
Colorado, July, 1871 (36 spp.); 8. Ogden, Utah, Sept.—Oct., 1871 (137 spp.); 9. General 
Summary or Combination of all the Observations (228 spp.). Besides the extended field- 
notes, there is much critical annotation. The article is very complete, and highly interesting 
from its bearing on general questions.’’— (Coues, l. c., pp. 689-690.) 


Ornithological Notes from the West.<Amer. Nat., May, June, July, 1872, 
pp. 263-275, 342-351, 394-404. 


I, Notes on the Birds of Kansas, pp. 263-275; II, Notes on the Birds of Colorado, pp. 
342-351; III, Notes on the Birds of the Great Salt Lake Valley, pp. 394-404. Field notes 
on the species observed, with brief sketches of the country traversed. (See above, No. 33, 
for the more formal report on the species observed.) 


1873. 


Monograph of the Spheniscide. < Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 38-40, Jan., 1873. 


Review of E. Coues’s ‘Material for a Monograph of the Spheniscide’ (Proc. Acad. Nat. 
Sct. Philadelphia, 1872, pp. 170-212). 


The Birds of Florida.< Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 165-166, March, 1873. 
A review of Part I, of C. J. Maynard’s work of this title (4to, pp. 32, Salem, 1872). 


A Text Book of North American Ornithology.<Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 308-309, 
May, 1873. 


A review of E. Coues’s ‘ Key to North American Birds,’ first edition. 


Revision of the American or Tyrant Flycatchers. << Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 35-88, 
Jan., 1873. 


Extended review of E. Coues’s ‘Studies of the Tyrannidz. Part I’ (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 
Philadelphia, 1872, pp. 58-81, July, 1872). 


Crows and Ravens. < Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 743-744, Dec., 1873. 


In reference to their supposed antagonism. It is stated that the author had found both 
crows and ravens together over portions of Dakota and Montana, both frequent and breeding 
in the same forests. 


Recent Contributions to American Geographical Ornithology.<Amer. Nat., 
VII, pp. 361-364, June, 1873. 


Review of Holden and Aiken’s ‘Notes on Birds of Wyoming and Colorado Territories’ 
(Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XV, pp. 193-210, Dec., 1872), W. D. Scott’s ‘Partial List of 
the Summer Birds of Kenawha County, West Virginia’ (ibid., pp. 219-228, Jan., 1873), and 
T. Martin Trippe’s * Notes on the Birds of Southern Iowa’ (ibid., pp. 229-242, March, 1873). 


The White-fronted Owl in Canada. <Amer. Nat., VII, pp. 427-428, July, 1873. 


On Nyctale albifrons Cassin (= N. acadica juv.); its rarity in comparison with the adult 
(N. acadica) noted, and evidence cited that this supposed species is rightly considered to be 
the young of NV. acadica. 


1874. 


Notes on the Natural History of Portions of Dakota and Montana Territories, 
being the substance of a report to the Secretary of War on the Collections 


120 


43. 


45. 


46. 


47. 


48. 


49. 


50. 


51. 


52. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


made by the North Pacific Railroad Expedition of 1873, Gen. D. 8S. Stanley, 
Commander. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, 1874, pp. 38-86. Also 
separately published, 8vo, Boston, 1874, pp. 1-61. 


““TII, Report on the Birds, pp. 44-68. 118 spp., fully annotated. the list preceded by 
general considerations of the avifauna of the region. and several partial local lists. An im- 
portant contribution.’’— (Coues, I. c., p. 699.) 


Field Ornithology. < Amer. Nat., VIII, pp. 418-420, July, 1874. 


A review of E. Coues’s work of this title (Svo, Salem and Boston, 1874). 


Laws of Geographical Variation in North American Mammals and Birds. < 
Amer. Nat., VIII, pp. 227-229, April, 1874. 


In reference to R. Ridgway’s article (Amer. Nat., VII. 1873, pp. 548-555), and making 
definite claim for certain original generalizations on this subject. (See also Coues, op. cit., 
pp. 415-421). 


1875. 


[Exhibition of a Specimen of the Sharp-tailed Finch from Illinois.]< Proc. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, 1875, pp. 292-295. 


First description of Ammodramus caudacutus var. nelsoni, and the ficst new form of bird 
described by the author. 


Influence of Elevation and Latitude upon the Distribution of Species. << Amer. 
Nat., TX, pp. 181-182, March, 1875. 


Coues’s Birds of the Northwest. < Atlantic Monthly, XXXVI, pp. 365-368, 
Sept., 1875. 
Review of the work (8vo, 1874, U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Sury. Terr.. Miscel. Pub. No. 3). 


Dr. Coues’s ‘ Birds of the Northwest.’ <Amer. Nat., [X, pp. 466-468, Aug., 1875. 


Review of the work. ' 


‘Birds of the Northwest.’ < Rod and Gun, VI, May 22, 1875, p. 119. 


A letter of comment upon the criticisms of Dr. Elliott Coues’s ‘ Birds of the Northwest,’ 
by a previous contributor. 


1876. 


Exploration of Lake Titicaca, by Alexander Agassiz and 8. W. Garman. III 
List of Mammals and Birds. By J. A. Allen, with Field-notes by Mr. 
Garman. < Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., III, pp. 349-359, July, 1876. 


An annotated list of 69 spp. of birds, pp. 353-359. Falcinellus ridgwayi, Gallinula garmani, 
spp. DOV. 


Progress in Ornithology in the United States during the last Century. <Amer. 
Nat., X, pp. 5386-550, Sept., 1876. 


An enumeration, with comment, of the principal works and papers of the previous cen- 
tury (1776-1876), followed by a ‘Surnmary of Progress.’ 


The Availability of certain Bartramian Names in Ornithology. <<Amer. Nat., X, 
pp. 21-29, Jan., 1876. 
In reference to Dr. E. Coues’s attempted revival of sundry Bartramian names for birds 


in his ‘Fasti Ornithologie Redivivi. No. I’ (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1874, pp. 
338-358). 


53. 


54. 
55. 


56. 


57. 


58. 


59. 


60. 


61. 


62. 


63. 


64. 


65. 


66. 


67. 


BIRDS. Alt 


Bartramian Names Again: An Explanation.< Amer. Nat., X, pp. 176, 177, 
March, 1876. 


Explanation of a misconception of the position assumed by his critic in Coues’s rejoinder 
(Amer. Nat., X, Jan. 1876, pp. 98-102) to ‘The Availability of Certain Bartramian Names.’ 
(Cf. supra, No. 52). 


Ornithological Calendar for March. < Forest and Stream, VI, p. 84, Mar. 16, 1876. 


Calendar for Birds in Massachusetts, March 20-31.<Forest and Stream, VI, 
p. 116, March 30, 1876. 


Calendar [for Birds in Massachusetts for April 1-20.]< Forest and Stream, VI, 
p. 1382, April 6, 1876. 


Send in the Reports. < Forest and Stream, VI, p. 115, March 30, 1876. 


On the importance of securing data on the migrations and habits of birds, with suggestions 
to observers. (See also supra, No. 9, on this subject.) 


The Extinction of the Great Auk at the Funk Islands.< Amer. Nat., X, p. 48, 
Jan., 1876. 


Geographical Variation in the Number and Size of the Eggs of certain North 
American Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, pp. 74-75, Sept., 1876. 


Southern representatives of northern species lay smaller eggs, and also a smaller number 
of eggs. 


Decrease of Birds in Massachusetts. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, pp. 53-60, Sept., 
1876. 


Statement of the case, and discussion of the causes, special reference being made to the 
Great Auk, Pinnated Grouse, Wild Turkey, Wild Pigeon, Swans, Cranes, Geese, etc. 


Breeding of the Canada Goose [Bernicla canadensis] in trees. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, p. 50, July, 1876. 


Anser [Chen] rossit in Oregon. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 52, July, 1876. 
Secured at Camp Harney, Oregon, by Capt. Charles Bendire. 


Occurrence of the Wood Ibis [Yantalus loculator] in Pennsylvania and New 
York. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 96, Nov., 1876. 


Field and Forest. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 71, Sept., 1876. 


Notice of Vol. II, No. 1, the only ornithological article it contains being on Wilson’s 
Phalarope by L. Kumlien. 


The Birds and Coming Storms. < Forest and Stream, VI, No. 9, p. 133, April 6, 
1876. 


Descriptions of New Species of American Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club., I, 
p. 47, July, 1876. 


Notice of two recent papers by G. N. Lawrence in Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, XI, 
pp. 163-166, and Jbis, July, 1875, pp. 383-387. 


Notes on the Breeding Habits of Clarke’s Crow (Picicorvus columbianus), with 
an account of its Nest and Eggs.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, pp. 44-46, 
July, 1876. 


122, BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Compiled from letters from Capt. Charles Bendire and published over his name, with 
explanatory and other comment. 


68. The Birds of Kansas. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, pp. 47-48, July, 1876. 


Notice of F. H. Snow’s third edition of his “A Catalogue of Kansas Birds’ (8vo, pp. 14, 
Nov. 1875). 


69. Extinct Birds with Teeth. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 49, July, 1876. 


Notice of O. C. Marsh’s papers on Ichthyornis, Apatornis, Hesperornis, Lestornis, in Amer. 
Journ. Sci., 1875 and 1876. 


70. Life-Histories of the Birds of Eastern Pennsylvania. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
I, pp. 49-50, July, 1876. 
Review of Vol. I of T. G. Gentry’s work of this title (12mo, Philadelphia, 1876). 


71. Decrease of Birds in the United States.<Penn. Monthly, pp. 931-944, Dec., 
1876. 


Their present numbers, particularly waterfowl and shore-birds, contrasted with the 
numbers recorded in the accounts of conditions in the 17th century. 


72. The Birds of Ritchie County, Virginia. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 72, Sept., 
1876. 


Brief notice of William Brewster’s paper (Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, XI, pp. 129- 
146). 


73. Birds of Southwestern Mexico. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 93, Nov., 1876. 


Brief notice of G. N. Lawrence’s paper on F. E. Sumichrast’s collection (Bull. U. S. Nat. 
Mus., No. 4, 1876). 


74. Jordan’s Manual of Vertebrate Animals. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, pp. 93-94, 
Nov., 1876. 


Review of the first edition of this well-known work by David Starr Jordan (12mo, Chicago, 
1876). 


75. The Portland Tern [Sterna portlandica]. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, pp. 71-72, 
Sept., 1876. 


Notice of William Brewster’s paper on the “so-called Sterna portlandica,’’ which he 
considers an unusual phase of Sterna macroura (Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. New York, XI, pp. 200- 
207, Feb. 18, 1876). 


76. Sexual, Individual, and Geographical Variation in Leucosticte tephrocotis. < 
Bull. U.S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., II, No. 4, July, 1876, pp. 345-350. 


A “considerable constant sexual variation in coloration and also... .in size,’’ overlooked 
by R. Ridgway in his monograph on the genus Leucosticte (Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. 
Terr., No. 2, 2d ser., May, 1875). 


77. Sexual Variation in the Genus Leucosticte. < Field and Forest, I1, No. 5, pp. 76- 
79, Nov., 1876. 


A rejoinder to Mr. Ridgway’s reply to criticisms of his Monograph of the Genus Leu- 
costicte. (Cf. supra, No. 76). 


1877. 


78. Recent Ornithological Papers. < Amer. Nat., XI, pp. 615-617, Oct., 1877. 
Reviews of Nelson’s paper on Illinois Birds in Bull. Essex Inst., VIII, 1877, pp. 90-155, 
and IX, pp. 32-65; McCauley’s on Texas Birds, in Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., 
III, 1877, 655-695, and others. 


a 


To: 


80. 


81. 


82. 


83. 


84. 


85. 


86. 


87. 


88. 


89. 


BIRDS. aes 


Californian Ornithology. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, I, p. 76, July, 1877. 


Review of Dr. J. G. Cooper’s paper ‘New Facts relating to Californian Ornithology’ 
(Proc. California Acad. Sci., 1876). 


McCauley’s Notes on Texan Ornithology. << Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, II, p. 76, 
July, 1877. 


Review of Lieut. C. A. H. McCauley’s paper (Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., 
III, No. 3, pp. 655-695, May 15, 1877). 


Occurrence of the Western Nonpareil [Cyanospiza versicolor], and Berlandier’s 
Wren [Thryothorus ludovicianus var. berlandiert] at Fort Brown, Texas. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, II, No. 4, pp. 109-110, Oct., 1877. 


Based on information furnished by Dr. J. C. Merrill. 


Ridgway’s ‘‘Studies of the American Falconide.” < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, II, 
pp. 70-73, July, 1877. 


Review of several of R. Ridgway’s papers on this family, in Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. 
Surv. Terr., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, and Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 


List of Birds collected by Mr. Charles Linden, near Santarem, Brazil. < Bull. 
Essex Inst., VIII, No. 8, 1876, pp. 78-83. (Pub. Feb., 1877). 


Annotated list of 128 spp.; Coccygus lindeni, sp. nov. 


The Influence of Physical Conditions in the Genesis of Species. << Radical Re- 
view, I, pp. 108-140, May, 1877. 


On the influence of environment in modifying forms of mammals and birds, and discussion 
of Darwin’s theory of the origin of species by natural selection. Reprinted (by request), 
with slightly modernized nomenclature by the author, in Ann. Rep. Smiths. Institution for 
1905 (1906). 


1878. 


Maynard’s Birds of Florida. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, II, p. 145, July, 1878. 


Notice of Part [V of C. J. Maynard’s “‘ Birds of Florida,” etc. (4to, Newtonville, Mass., 
pp. 89-112, one pl.). The full title now employed is ‘The Birds of Florida, with the Water 
and Game Birds of Eastern North America.’ 


Jordan’s Manual of Vertebrated Animals. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 
145-146, July, 1878. 


Brief notice of the 2d ed., revised and enlarged (1878). (Cf. supra, No. 74.) 


The Carolinian Fauna. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, July, 1878, pp. 149-150. 


Apropos of Eugene Bicknell’s paper (Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 128-132) and 
continuing the subject (northward extension into the lower Hudson River valley). 


Brewer’s Supplement to his Catalogue of New England Birds.<Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, III, p. 185, Oct., 1878. 


Review of paper by Dr. T. M. Brewer (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XIX, pp. 301-309), 
which adds 21 spp. to his ‘Catalogue of the Birds of New England’ published in 1875. 


Elliot’s Review of the Ibidine, or Ibises. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 182, 
Oct., 1878. 


Review of D. G. Elliot’s paper of this title (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1877, pp. 477-510). 


124 


90. 


91. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


[The Glossy Ibis, [bis falcinellus, in Massachusetts.] < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 


III, p. 152, July, 1878. 


Note, following a record of this species in Massachusetts by C. B. Cory, on the occurrence 
of two other individuals on Cape Cod at about the same time. Also a foot-note on the 
correct generic name of the bird, which is stated to be Plegadis Kaup. (Cf. Ibis, 4th ser., 
II, Jan., 1878, p. 112). 


A list of the Birds of Massachusetts, with Annotations. < Bull. Essex Inst., X,. 


pp. 3-37, 1878. 


“This may be considered to supercede previous tracts on the same subject, both by the 
present and other authors, as it completely sums our knowledge of the subject. The paper 
opens with summary considerations, followed by a valuable historical résumé. 1. Species. 
of authentic occurrence within the State, 317. 2. Extirpated, 4. 3. Of probable occur- 
rence, 24. 4. Hypothetical and doubtful species, 3 (Myiodioctes minutus, Empidonaz: 
pygmexus of Minot, Thaumatias linnei). 5. Introduced undomesticated species, 6.— 
‘Considered as fairly entitled to recognition as Massachusetts birds,’ 340. Known to breed 
in the State, about 135. Extremely rare or accidental visitors, 90. North American species. 
added since 1867, 35.’’ — (Coues, lI. c., p. 736). 


92. Sabine’s Gull [Xema sabinti] in Maine. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 195, 


93. 


Oct., 1878. 


The only previous New England record for this species is Boston Harbor, Mass., Sept. 24, 
1874 (Brewster, Amer. Sportsman, V, 1875, p. 370; Brewer, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 
XVII, 1875, p. 449. 


Occurrence of three Species of Sea-Ducks [Gidemia americana, CL. fusca, GZ. 


perspictllata] at St. Louis, Missouri. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 148- 
149, July, 1878. 


94. Description of a Fossil Passerine Bird from the Insect-bearing Shales of Colo- 


95. 


96. 


97. 


98. 


rado. <Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, No. 2, May 3, 1878, art. 
xix, pp. 448-445, pl. 1, figg. 1, 2. 


‘* Paleospiza bella, g. sp. n., p. 443 — the first fossil Passerine discovered in North America. 
It bears distinct impressions of feathers. IN. B.— a few copies of this No. of the Bull. were 
in private circulation from about April 14, and some electros of the plate were sent out during 
this month. Thus, the cut appeared in a Californian newspaper [Cf. infra, No. 117 ] with a 
compiled account of the bird, April 27. The article was immediately reprinted in the Am. 
Journ. Sci., for May, 1878.’’— (Coues, I. c., p. 738). The type specimen, lost for many years 
was recovered in 1915. 


Birds of the Vicinity of Cincinnati. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 34, Jan., 


1878. 


Review of F. W. Langdon’s ‘Catalogue of the Birds of the Vicinity of Cincinnati’ (Svo, 
Salem, 1877, pp. 18). 


Rowley’s ‘The Pied Duck [Camptolemus labradorius]. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 


Club, III, pp. 79-80, Apr., 1878. 
Review of G. D. Rowley’s Monograph (Orn. Miscel., 11, pt. vii, 1877). 


Barrows’s ‘Catalogue of the Alcide.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 86, Apr., 


1878. 


Brief review of W. B. Barrows’s his paper of this title (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XIX, 
1877, pp. 150-165). 


Ridgway’s ‘Studies of the American Herodiones.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, II, 


pp. 182-188, Oct., 1878. 


99. 


100. 


101. 


102. 


103. 


104. 


105. 


106. 


LOT. 


108. 


109. 


110. 


BIRDS. 125 


Review of R. Ridgway’s paper in Bull. U.S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., LV, pp. 219-251, 
Feb. 5, 1878. 


Reichenow’s Review of the Herons and their Allies. << Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
III, pp. 183-185, Oct., 1878. 


Extended review of Dr. Anton Reichenow’s ‘Uebersicht der Schreitvégel,’ in Cabanis’s 
Journ. fiir Ornith., Jabrg. XX V, Apr.—July, 1877, pp. 113-171, 225-278. 


An Inadequate ‘Theory of Birds’ Nests.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 23- 
32, Jan., 1878. 
A criticism of A. R. Wallace’s ‘Theory of Birds’ Nests.’ 


Late Capture of the Yellow-bellied Flycatcher [Hmpidonaz flaviventris] in 
Massachusetts. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 101-102, Apr., 1878. 
Novy. 29, and Dec. 1, 1876 — two records. 


The Lark-Bunting [Calamospiza bicolor] in Massachusetts. << Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Chib, Tt, p. 48, Jan., 1878. 


First record of the capture of this species east of the Mississippi River. 


Rufous-headed Sparrow [Peucea ruficeps] in Texas.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
III, pp. 188-189, Oct., 1878. 
Gainesville, Texas, April 24, 1878, collected by George H. Ragsdale. 


The Snow-Bird [Junco hyemalis] in Summer on Mount Wachusett, Mass. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 192, Oct., 1878. 
On the authority of Bradford Torrey. 


Early Nesting of the Shore Lark [EHremophila alpestris] near Indianapolis, Ind. 
<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 189, Oct., 1878. 


Young birds half-grown April 24, 1878. Based on information communicated by David 
S. Jordan (in lit.). 


Ridgway’s Ornithology of the Fortieth Parallel.<Amer. Nat., XII, p. 469, 
July, 1878. 


Review of the work (Expl. 40th Parallel, IV, pt. iii, 4to, 1877). 


Sharpe’s ‘Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, III, pp. 77-79, Apr., 1878. 
Review of Volume I, 1874 (Falconide), Volume II, 1875 (Strigide), and Vol. III, 1877 
(the Coliomorphe — Crows, Birds of Paradise, Orioles, etc.). 


[Pipilo erythrophthalmus with white spots on the Scapulars.]<Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, III, p. 42, Jan., 1878. 


Taken near Leavenworth, Kansas. 


Summer Birds of the Adirondacks. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 36, Jan., 
1878. 


Notice of T. Roosevelt and H. D. Minot’s paper (8vo, 1877, pp. 4, privately printed.) 


Birds of Central New York.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 34-35, Jan., 
1878. 


Review of F. B, Rathbun’s List, in Auburn Daily Advertiser, Aug. 14, 1877. 


11k), 


114. 


ARS 


bee 


118; 


TELS) 


120. 


ae 
ss 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Birds of Southern Ilhnois. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, p. 36, Jan., 1878. 
Review of E. W. Nelson’s paper (Bull. Essex Inst., IX, pp. 32-65, June, 1877). 


Gentry’s ‘Life-Histories of the Birds of Eastern Pennyslvania.’ <Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, III, pp. 36-37, Jan., 1878. 
Review of Vol. II, of this work (cf. supra, No. 70). 


Street’s Notes on the Birds of Lower California and the Hawaiian and Fanning 
Islands. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 80-81, April, 1878. 


Review of Dr. Thomas H. Street’s paper in Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 7 (birds, pp. 9-33, 
1877). 


Bendire’s Notes on the Birds of Southeastern Oregon. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, III, p. 81, April, 1878. 


Review of Capt. Charles Bendire’s paper in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XIX, 1877, pp. 
109-149. 


Ridgway’s Report on the Ornithology of the Fortieth Parallel.< Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, III, pp. 81-83, April, 1878. 


Review of R. Ridgway’s ‘Ornithology’ in Vol. IV, Part iii, Explor. 40th Parallel, pp. 303- 
670, 1877. (Cf. supra, No. 106.) 


Feilden’s ‘List of Birds Observed in Smith Sound,’ etc.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, TM, p: 86; April, 13878: 
Review of H. W. Feilden’s paper (Ibis, 4th ser., I, 1877, pp. 401-412). 


A Remarkable Fossil Bird. [Palwospiza bella Allen] < Pacific Rural Press (news- 
paper), April 27, 1878. Vol. XV, No. 17, p. 257, fig. 


“*Anonymous, but contributed to the paper by the U. S. Geological Survey. It is an 
abstract of the orig. account, accompanied by an electro, and actually antedates the regular 
publication of the article by six days.’’— Coues, |.c.,p.738. (Cf. supra, No. 94.) 


The Nuttall Ornithological Club. <Boston Journal, Mar. 19, 1878. 


“*A dignified and well-considered defence of the Club from the attacks made in the article 
entitled ‘History Repeating Itself,’ and elsewhere. ‘Neither the ideas, the similes, nor the 
phraseology of the article are new, having done service repeatedly in other Boston papers. 
within a few weeks in a similar connection. Therefore the inference is natural, that they 
have emanated, either directly or indirectly, from a single source. The article in question 
is simply a presentation, in connected form, of the various anonymous squibs that have 
appeared repeatedly in other papers. ... Unfortunate, indeed, is it if this purely practical 
and scientific question cannot be discussed on its merits, and that the defenders of the [Eng- 
lish] sparrows must confess their weakness by a persistent resort to such unsafe weapons as. 
misrepresentation and ridicule.’’’— Coues, ‘On Present Status of Passer domesticus,’ etc..,. 
in Bull. U.S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., V, 1879, p. 185). 


The Nuttall Ornithological Club. <Evening Transcript, Mar. 21, 1878. 


**A defence of the Club, which has been referred to contemptuously as a body of “‘Cam- 
bridge juveniles, precocious boys, over-modest youths,” etc., including a statement 
of its organization and operations, and the real character of its membership. T. M. Brewer 
is mentioned as a member, and a contributor to the Bulletin of the Club.’’— Coues, l. c. 


99 66 99 66 


The Nuttall Ornithological Club. Sketch of our Cambridge Ornithological 
Society. <<Cambridge Chronicle, March 30, 1878. 


BIRDS. 17 


121. Nuttall Ornithological Club. Sparrows [Passer domesticus]|.— The Nuttall 
Ornithological Club decides against them. < Boston Daily Advertiser, CX XXI, 
No. 47, Feb. 28, 1878. (Anonymous.) 


“The inside history of this article is: Some time about January, 1878, Dr. Brewer was 
in my office in Washington, where some words on the subject grew a little heated toward the 
close of the interview, when I proposed that it would be well to ask the Nuttall Club to take 
up and sift the matter, that we might get at the facts, if possible. The reply was compli- 
mentary neither to the sincerity of my proposition nor to the ornithological ability of the 
Club, of which he was amember. I soon afterward addressed to the Club a communication 
inviting their attention to the matter, suggesting a full and fair discussion of the subject 
in open meeting, and representing that the Club was specially well qualified to come to just 
conclusions, consisting, as it did, of a number of working ornithologists of recognized ability 
and experience, who were perfectly familiar with the case as presented in Boston, Cambridge, 
and vicinity. The meeting was soon after held. Notice was sent to the resident members 
of the proposed consideration of the question, and corresponding members were also invited 
to take part in the discussion. Dr. Brewer for some reason did not attend the meeting. 
The report of the meeting, constituting the present article, indicates that Mr. J. A. Allen, 
Mr. William Brewster, Mr. H. A. Purdie, Mr. H. D. Minot, Mr. Ruthven Deane, and others, 
participated in the discussion. Mr. Allen’s views are not here presented. All the testimony 
here reported is unfavorable to the Sparrows, but need not be here analyzed, as it is only 
what every competent and unprejudiced observer knows; it is explicit, emphatic, and irref- 
ragable, substantiating every count that has been brought against the birds. The article 
includes an open letter to Dr. Brewer from John Dixwell, M. D., stating that in 39 individuals, 
taken at the height of the canker-worm pest, no trace of insect food could be found on dis- 
secting; the publication of which letter gave offence to Dr. Brewer, who considered it an 
unwarrantable liberty to take with hisname. At the close of the discussion a vote was taken 
on the question of whether or not, in the opinion of those present, the further increase of the 
house sparrow in this country was desirable. The result was a unanimous negative.’’— 
Coues, I. c. 


122. Nuttall Ornithological Club. Sparrows [Passer domesticus] brought to Judg- 
ment. Discussion of the Nuttall Ornithological Club upon the Merits and 
Demerits of the English Sparrow in the United States. <The Country (news- 
paper of New York), pp. 245-246, Feb. 23, 1878. 


“This is the full report of the meeting, communicated officially by the Club, occupying 
nearly two pages (5 columns). It gives much matter additional to that published in the 
Boston Daily Advertiser, and is especially important in presenting at length views of J. A. 
Allen, and in including communications from Mr. R. Ridgway and Dr. C. C. Abbott, not 
given in the Boston report of the proceedings. Allen’s carefully considered testimony, 
though well guarded, is, emphatically and explicitly, against the Sparrows. ‘Mr. Allen 
further stated, that every ornithologist of note throughout the country who has expressed 
himself upon the subject (and nearly all have done so) has, almost without exception, de- 
clared against the Sparrows. Not a few of them consider their rapid increase an alarming 
evil, which will soon call for legislative action to hold it in check.’’’— Coues, l. c. 


123. The Sparrows [Passer domesticus].<Evening Transcript, Mar. 19, 1878. (By 
H. A. Purdie.) 


“*Covering a copy of The Country of February 23, 1878, which contained the full report 
of the Nuttall Club’s proceedings, Mr. J. A. Allen’s testimony having been omitted from the 
report as published in Boston. Mr. Allen’s testimony follows.’’— Coues, l. c. 


124. [Range of the Fish Crow in New York and New England]. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, II, p. 47, Jan., 1878. 


125. Persistency in Nest-building by a Pair of City Robins [T'urdus migratorius]. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, III, pp. 108-104, Apr., 1878. 


Rebuilt their nest five times when it was removed by a human friend of the birds, owing 
to the unsafe nature of the site on account of cats. 


128 


126. 


nares 


128. 


129. 


130. 


131. 


132. 


138. 


134. 


135. 


136. 


137. 


138. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1879. 


Notes on the Sea-Birds of the Grand Banks. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, IV, 
pp. 127-128, April, 1879. 


Based mainly on letters from Raymond L. Newcomb. 


Lawrence and Ober on the Birds of Dominica and St. Vincent. < Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, IV, pp. 48-49, Jan., 1879. 


Notices of five of G. N. Lawrence’s papers on F. A. Ober’s collections in the Lesser Antilles, 
in Ann. New York Acad. Sci., and Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1878. 


Elliot’s Synopsis of the Trochilide. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, IV, pp. 230-232, 
Oct., 1879. 


G. Elliot’s ‘A Classification and Synopsis of the Trochilide’ (4to, Smiths. Inst., 1879). 


Nest and Eggs of the Cerulean Warbler [Dendreca cerulea].< Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, IV, pp. 25-27, Jan., 1879. 


Odd Behavior of a Robin [Turdus migratorius] and a Yellow Warbler (Den- 
dreca estiva|.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, IV, pp. 178-182, July, 1879. 


Brewer on the Nests and Eggs of ime < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, IV, 
p. 232, Oct., 1878. 


Review of Dr. T. M. Brewer’s paper (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. I, 1879). 


Belding and Ridgway’s Birds of Central California. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
IV, July, 1879, pp. 167-171. 


Review of L. Belding and R. Ridgway’s ‘A Partial List of the Birds of Central Cali- 
fornia’ (in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1, April, 1879), with remarks on methods of designating 
“incipient species,’ including a history of the evolution and adoption of the trinomial 
system in the United States. 


The Evening Grosbeak [Hesperiphona vespertina] in New Mexico. < Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, IV, p. 237, Oct., 1879. 


Birds of the Colorado Valley.<The Nation, March 20, 1879. (Anonymous.) 
Review of Dr. Coues’s ‘ Birds of the Colorado Valley,’ 8vo, 1878. 


Birds of the Southwest. <Science News, I, pp. 81-84, Jan. 15. 
Review of Dr. Coues’s ‘ Birds of the Colorado Valley.’ 


1880. 


Roberts on the Convolution of the Trachea in the Sandhill and Whooping 
Cranes [Grus canadensis and G. americana].< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
pp. 179-180, July, 1880. 

Short notice of T. S. Roberts’s paper (Amer. Nat., XIV, 1880, pp. 108-114). 


The Tennessee Warbler [Helminthophaga peregrina] destructive to Grapes. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 48, Jan., 1880. 


Eastward Range of the Western Meadow Lark [Sturnella magna neglecta]. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 53-54, Jan., 1880. 


To central and western Iowa, southern Michigan, and northwestern Illinois. 


139. 


140. 


141. 


142. 


143. 


144. 


145. 


146. 


147. 


148. 


149. 


150. 


Lol: 


BIRDS. 129 


[Note on Chordeiles popetue minor in Florida].<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
p. 54, Jan., 1880. 


Note to Mr. Greene Smith’s record under this title. 


The King Eider [Somateria spectabilis] at Buffalo, N. Y.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, V, pp. 62-63, Jan., 1880. 


On recent additions to the Ornithological Fauna of North America. < Bull, 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 85-92, April, 1880. 


The additions, formally listed, with references to places of original record, number 38, 
with an introductory ‘Retrospective’ of 4 pp. 


A Crossbilled Horned Lark [Eremophila alpestris.]< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
V, p. 115, April, 1880. 


[Note on a Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) taken in Northern New 
York.] <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 119, April, 1880. 


Capture of Escaped Cage-birds having the Appearance of Wild Birds. < Bull. 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 119-121, April, 1880. 


Records for various exotic species, with comment. 


Note on the Little Brown Crane (Grus fraterculus Cassin). <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, V, pp. 123-124, April, 1880. 


Comparison of a specimen taken in eastern Mexico with specimens of Grus canadensis. 


Destruction of Birds by Light-houses. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 131- 
138, July, 1880. 


Statistics of migrating birds killed by lighthouses. 


Origin of the Instinct of Migration in Birds.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
pp. 151-154, July, 1880. 


Attributed to change of climate at the close of the Tertiary period. ‘‘ What was at first 
a forced migration would soon become habitual, and through the heridity of habit give rise 
to that wonderful faculty we term the instinct of migration” (p. 153). 


List of the Birds of the Island of Santa Lucia, West Indies.< Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, V, pp. 163-169, July, 1880. 


Annotated list of 56 spp.; first record for the island of 16 species. 


First Capture of the Blue Grosbeak [Goniaphea cerulea] in Massachusetts. < 
Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 184, July, 1880. 


Capture of a South American Finch [Gubernatrix cristatella] near Providence, 
R. 1.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 240, Oct., 1880. 


In perfect plumage, showing no sign of previous captivity. 


Coues’s Bibliography of American Ornithology. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
pp. 40-41, Jan., 1880. 

Review of the Second Instalment (Faunal Publications relating to Central and South 
America), in Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., V, pp.’ 239-330, Sept., 1879. Also 
mention of the same author’s paper ‘On the Present Status of Passer domesticus in America,’ 
etc., op. cit., pp. 175-193. 


130 


152. 


153. 


154. 


155. 


156. 


157. 


158. 


159. 


160. 


161. 


162. 


163. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Ridgway on the Species of the Genera Scops and Tyrannus, etc. <Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, V, pp. 41-42, Jan., 1880. 


Review of four papers by R. Ridgway in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1878. 


McChesney’s Notes on the Birds of Fort Sisseton, Dakota Territory. <Bull.- 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 42-48, Jan., 1880. 


Review of Dr. Chas. E. McChesney’s paper of this title in Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. 
Surv. Terr., V, 1879, pp. 71-104. 


Minor Ornithological Publications. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, Jan., 1880, 
pp. 43-46; April, 1880, pp. 112-115; July, 1880, pp. 180, 181. 


Brief notices of 54 papers in Forest and Stream, Field and Forest, and Forest and Stream 
(Nos. 1-54). Continued in subsequent volumes of the Nuttall Bulletin and The Auk till 1887. 
The record begins with the close of that given by Dr. Coues in his ‘ List of Faunal Publica- 
tions relating to North American Ornithology,’ published in his ‘ Birds of the Colorado Valley,’ 
or about July, 1878. (Cf. infra, Nos. 178, 181, 192, 200, 205, 214, 218.) 


Henshaw’s Report on Collections made in California, Nevada, and Oregon 
in 1877-78 < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 105-107, April, 1880. 


Review of H. W. Henshaw’s report in Rep. U. 8. Geogr. Surv. West of 100th Meridian, 
App. L, pp. 282-335, Feb. 1880. 


Cory’s Birds of the Bahamas Islands.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 107, 
April, 1880. 
Review of Chas. B. Cory’s book of this title (4to, Boston, 1880). 


Brewer’s Additional Notes on New England Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
V, pp. 108-109, April, 1880. 
Review of Dr. T. M. Brewer’s supplemental list, in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, 
pp. 4386-454. 


Kumlien’s Contributions to the Natural History of Arctic America. <Bull. 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 109-110, April, 1880. ' 


Review of the bird portion of Ludwig Kumlien’s ‘Contributions to the Natural History 
of Arctic America,’ etc. (Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 15, 1879; Birds, pp. 69-105). ‘ 


Gibbs’s List of the Birds of Michigan.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 110,° 
April, 1880. 


Review of Dr. Morris Gibbs’s ‘Annotated List of the Birds of Michigan’ (Bull. U. S. 
Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., V, No. 3, Nov. 1879). 


Harvie-Brown on the Capercaillie in Scotland. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
pp. 110-111, April, 1880. 


Review of J. A. Harvie-Brown’s ‘The Capercaillie in Scotland’ (8vo, Edinburgh, 1879). 


Sennett’s ‘Further Notes on the Birds of the Lower Rio Grande of Texas.’ | 
<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 111, April, 1880. 


Review of George B. Sennett’s second paper on Texas Birds (Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. 
Surv. Terr., V, 1879, pp. 371-440). 


Minot’s Diary of a Bird. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 112, April, 1880. 
Review of H. D. Minot’s ‘The Diary of a Bird’ (8vo, Boston, 1880). 


Freke on Birds common to Europe and North America. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, V, pp. 173-174, July, 1880. 


164. 


165. 


166. 


167. 


168. 


169. 


170. 


On: 


172. 


32 


174. 


BIRDS. tot 


Review of ‘A Comparative Catalogue of Birds found in Europe and North America’ 
by Percy Evans Freke (8vo, Dublin, 1880). 


Brayton’s Catalogue of the Birds of Indiana.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
pp. 174-175, July, 1880. 


Review of Dr. A. W. Brayton’s paper on Indiana birds, in Trans. Indiana Hort. Soc. for 
1879, pp. 89-166 (1880). 


Mearns’s Birds of the Hudson Highlands. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 175, 
July, 1880. 


Review of Dr. E. A. Mearns’s ‘ List of the Birds of the Hudson Highlands,’ in Bull. Essex 
Inst., Vols. X, XI, 1879-80. 


Harvie-Brown and Cordeaux’s ‘Report on the Migration of Birds in the 
Autumn of 1879.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 175-176, July, 1880. 
Review of their paper in The Zoologist, May, 1880, pp. 161-204. 


Ridgway on the Nomenclature of North American Birds. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, V, pp. 177-178, July, 1880. 
Review of his ‘Revisions of Nomenclature of Certain North American Birds,’ in Bull. 


U. S. Nat. Mus., 1880, pp. 1-16. 


Cooper on the Migration and Nesting Habits of West-Coast Birds. <Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, V, p. 282, Oct., 1880. 
Review of Dr. J. G. Cooper’s paper of this title in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1879, pp. 241- 
251. 


Langdon’s Ornithological Field Notes. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 232- 
233, Oct., 1880. 
Review of Frank W. Langdon’s paper in Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., July, 1880, 
pp. 121-127. 


Stearns’s List of the Birds of Fishkill, New York. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, 
p. 233, Oct., 1880. 


Review of a privately printed brochure (8vo, pp. 16, without date). 
Harvie-Brown on the Effects of an unusually severe Winter upon Scottish 
Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, pp. 233-234, Oct., 1880. 


Review of a paper by J. A. Harvie-Brown, in Proc. Nat. Hist. Soc. Glasgow, 1879, pp. 123- 
190. 


Frank R. Rathbun’s ‘Bright Feathers.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, V, p. 234, 
Oct., 1880. 
Review of Part I of this work (4to, Auburn, N. Y.). 
C. B. Cory’s ‘Beautiful and Curious Birds of the World.’ <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, p. 236, Oct., 1880. 
Review of Part I, of this work (elephant-folio, Boston, 1880). 


1881. 
New England Bird Life. <The Nation, No. 845, Sept. 8, 1881. (Anonymous.) 


Review of Part I of Winifrid A. Stearns and Elliott Coues’s ‘New England Bird-Life’ 
(8vo, Boston, 1881). 


132 


175. 


176: 


IEG 


178. 


179. 


180. 


181. 


182. 


183. 


184. 


185. 


186. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Insectivorous Birds in their Relation to Man. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, 
pp. 22-27, Jan., 1881. 


Summary of recent investigations in economic ornithology. 


Coues’s Third Instalment of American Ornithological Bibliography. <Bull. 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, pp. 44-46, Jan., 1881. 


Review of the Systematic Section, in Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., V, 1880, 
pp. 521-1066. 


Coues’s Fourth Instalment of Ornithological Bibliography.<Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, VI, p. 46, Jan., 1881. 


Review of the section relating to British Birds,. in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., II, 1880, pp. 
359-476. 


Minor Ornithological Papers. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, pp. 47-53, Jan., 
1881. 
Includes 86 titles (Nos. 55-140). Cf. supra, No. 154. 


Some Observations on the Migration of Birds. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, 
pp. 100, 188, April, 1881. 
_A half-page footnote to W. E. D. Scott’s paper of this title, and a later correction of 
an erroneous statement in it. Mr. Scott’s paper relates to observations made at night 
through a telescope at Princeton, N. J. 


Shufeldt’s Osteological Memoirs. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, pp. 109-110, 
April, 1881. 
Reviews of Dr. R. W. Shufeldt’s papers on the Burrowing Owl and Horned Lark, in Bull. 
U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., VI, 1881. 


Minor Ornithological Papers.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, pp. 112-118, 
April, 1881. 
Titles Nos. 141-160. (Cf. supra, Nos. 154 and 178.) 


Supplementary List of Birds of the Island of Santa Lucia, W. I.<Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, VI, p. 128, April, 1881. 
Adds 12 species to the previously published List (cf. supra, No. 148). 


Winter Birds of Fort Walla Walla, W. T.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, p. 128, 
April, 1881. 


Based on letters from Capt. Charles Bendire. 


Ridgway’s Nomenclature of North American Birds.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, VI, pp. 164-171, July, 1881. 


Review, with historical summary of the subject, of R. Ridgway’s paper under this title 
(Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 21, 1881). 


Ridgway’s Revised Catalogue of the Birds of Illinois.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, VI, pp. 171-172, July, 1881. 
Review of R. Ridgway’s paper in Bull No. 4, Illinois State Lab. Nat. Hist., 1881. 


Godman and Salvin’s ‘Biologia Centrali-Americana.’<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, VI, pp. 174-176, July, 1881. 
Review of the ‘Aves’ (Zodlogy, Parts I-X, p. 1-152, pll. i-x). 


187. 


188. 


189. 


190. 


LOW: 


192. 


193. 


194. 


195. 


196. 


OT 


198. 


199. 


BIRDS. 138 


A Second Massachusetts Specimen of the Red-bellied Woodpecker (Centurus 
carolinus).< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, p. 183, July, 1881. 


Larus glaucus in Texas. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VI, No. 3, p. 187, July, 1881. 
Record of a specimen taken in Clay County, Texas, Dec. 18, 1880. 


The Migration of Birds.<Scribner’s Monthly Magazine, XXII, pp. 932-938, 
Oct., 1881. 


A general review of the subject from the viewpoint of the author, elaborating points stated 
in No. 147, supra. 


1882. 


Capture of Plectrophenax nivalis in Chester, South Carolina. <Bull. Nutt. 
Ornith. Club, VII, p. 54, Jan., 1882. 


Given on authority of Leverett M. Loomis. 


The Sharp-tailed Finch [Ammodramus caudacutus nelsoni] in Kansas. < Bull. 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, VII, p. 55, Jan., 1882. 


Minor Ornithological Papers.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VII, pp. 115-118, 
April, 1882. 
Titles numbered 161-189. (Cf. supra, Nos. 154, 178, and 181.) 


1883. 


[Note on a Hybrid Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis + Junco hyemalis).|< Bull. 
Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 79-80, April, 1883. Description (lI. c.) by 
Mr. Charles H. Townsend. 


Note on Exceptions to the Law of Increase in Size Northward among North 
American Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 80-82, April, 1883. 


In certain genera of Oscines which are for the most part tropical in distribution. 


The British Museum Catalogue of Birds.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, 
pp. 99-105, April, 1883. 
Review of Vols. IV, V, VI. 


Ridgway on the Tree-creepers. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, p. 118, April, 
1883. , 
Review of R. Ridgway’s paper on the group (in Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1882, pp. 111-116). 


Ridgway’s Review of the Genus Centurus.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, 
p. 114, April, 1883. 
Notice of the paper (in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1881, pp. 93-119). 


Freke on North American Birds crossing the Atlantic. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, VIII, pp. 114-115, April, 1888. 


Review of Percy Evans Freke’s paper of this title, published in Sct. Proc. Dublin Soc., 
III, 1881. 


Freke on European Birds Observed in America.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, p. 115, April, 1883. 


Review of Percy Evans Freke’s paper of this title in The Zoologist, Sept., 1881. 


134 


200. 


201. 


202. 


203. 


204. 


205. 


206. 


207. 


208. 


209. 


210. 


PAU 


212. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Minor Ornithological Publications. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 116- 
119, April, 1883. 


Continued, embracing titles numbered 190-235. (Cf. supra, Nos. 154, 178, 181, and 192.) 


Capture of the Great Gray Owl in Massachusetts.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, p. 128, April, 1888. 
Near Springfield, Feb., 1882. 


List of Birds Observed in the Vicinity of Colorado Springs, Colorado, during 
March, April and May, 1882.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 151-161, 
189-198, 1883. 


With William Brewster. An Annotated list of 134 species. 


Ridgway on New Species and Subspecies of Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, pp. 168-169, July, 1883. 


Brief notices of eight of R. Ridgway’s recent papers. 


Dubois on Geographical Variation in the Crossbills. <<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, p. 170, July, 1883. 


Review of ‘“‘De la Variabilité des Oiseaux du genre Loria”’ (Bull. du Musée royal d’ Hist. 
Nat. de Belgique, I, 1882). 


Minor Ornithological Publications. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 171- 
178, July, 1888. 
Continued, including titles numbered 236-364. (Cf. supra, Nos. 154, 178, 181, 192, and 
200.) 


The Wood Ibis in Massachusetts.< Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, p. 187, 
July, 1888. 


Taken at Georgetown, Mass., June 19, 1880. 


The American Ornithologists’ Union. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 221- 
226, Oct., 1888. 


Its origin and founding, etc. 


Goss’s Birds of Kansas. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, p. 227, Oct., 1883. 
Review of ‘A Catalogue of the Birds of Kansas’ by N. S. Goss (8vo, Topeka, 1883). 


Beckham’s Birds of Nelson County, Kentucky.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, pp. 227-228, Oct., 1883. 


Review of C. W. Beckham’s paper in Journ. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist., VI, pp. 136-147, 
July, 1883. 


Migration of Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, pp. 228-231, Oct., 1888. 
Notices of seven Migration Reports, of different countries, for the years 1880 and 1881. 


Bean’s Notes on Birds Collected in Alaska and Siberia. <Bull. Nutt. Ornith. 
Club, p. 231; Oct., 1883. 
Review of Tarleton H. Bean’s paper (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., V, 1882, pp. 144-173).4 


Turner on Lagopus mutus and its Varieties. <Buli. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VIII, 
p. 232, Oct., 1883. 


Review of Lucien M. Turner’s paper (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., V, 1882, pp. 225-233). 


a 


213. 


214. 


215. 


216. 


Tae 


218. 


219. 
220. 
221. 


222. 


223. 


224. 


224. 


BIRDS. to 


Reichenow’s ‘Die Vogel der Zoologischen Garten.’ < Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, 
VIII, p..232, Oct., 1883. 


Review of Part 1, of this work (8vo, Leipzig, 1882). 


Minor Ornithological Publications. << Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, VII, pp. 223- 
238, Oct., 1883. 
Continued, including titles numbered 365-454. (Cf. supra, Nos. 154, 178, 181, 200, and 
205.) 


Intelligence of the Crow. <Science, N.S., I, No. 18, p. 518, June 8, 18853. 


New England Bird Life. < The Nation, No. 989, p. 537, June 21, 1883. [Anon.] 
Review of Part II of Stearns and Coues’s ‘New England Bird Life.’ 


1884. 


Stejneger and Ridgway on Birds of the Commander Islands. < Auk, I, pp. 81- 
82, Jan., 1884. 


Review of ‘Contributions to the Natural History of the Commander Islands, No. 1’ 
(Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 1883, pp. 58-89). 


1884-87. Minor Ornithological Publications.<Auk, I, 1884, pp. 85-89, 
185-190, 285-289; II, 1885, pp. 96-101, 209-214, 295-302; 372-375; ITI, 
1886, pp. 270-273, 475-478; IV, 1887, pp. 66-69, 337-342. 


An annotated list of 1199 titles of minor papers relating to ornithology, begun in 1880 in 
Bulletin Nuttall Ornithological Club, and closed with the last date here given. (Continued 
in later volumes of The Auk till 1894, by Charles F. Batchelder). 


Coues’s ‘Key to North American Birds.’ <Science, N. 8., IV, pp. 86-87, July 
25, 1884. 


Review of the second edition. 


Stejneger on the American Turdide. < Auk, I, pp. 181-182, April, 1884. 
Review of Dr. L. Stejneger’s ‘Remarks on the Systematic Arrangement of the American 
Turdide’ (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., V, 1882, pp. 449-483). 
Jeffries on the Epidermal System of Birds. <Avuk, I, pp. 182-183, April, 1884. 


Review of J. Amory Jeffries’s ‘The Epidermal System of Birds’ (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., XXII, pp. 203-240, pll. iv-vi, Dec. 1883). 


A Plea for the Metric System in Ornithology. < Auk, I, April, 1884, pp. 203-205. 


Communication by Dr. C. Hart Merriam, with editorial comment in approval of the 
‘Plea.’ 


The British Museum Catalogue of Birds.<Auk, I, pp. 278-281, July, 1884. 
Review of Vol. VII, by R. Bowdler Sharpe, and Vol. VIII, by Hans Gadow. 


Coues’s ‘Key to North American Birds.’ <Auk, I, pp. 282-283, July, 1884. 


Review of second edition. 


Key to North American Birds. <The Nation, XX XIX, No. 996, p. 99, July 31, 
1888. (Anon.) 


Review of second edition of Coues’s work of this title. 


136 


232. 


235. 


236. 


238. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Second Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union. <Auk, I, pp. 369- 
379, Oct., 1884. 


Brewster on Birds in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. <Auk, I, pp. 379-380, Oct., 
1884. 


Review of William Brewster’s ‘Notes on the Birds of a Summer Cruise in the Gulf of St. 
Lawrence’ (Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., X X11, pp. 364-412). 


Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway’s ‘Water Birds of North America.’ <Avuk, I, pp. 
382-386, Oct., 1884. 
Review of the work (2 vols., 4to, Boston, 1884). 


1885. 


A Naturalist’s Rambles about Home. <Auk, II, pp. 86-88, June, 1885. 
Review of Chas. C. Abbott’s book of this title (Svo, New York, 1884). 


Seebohm’s History of British Birds.< Auk, II, pp. 88-91, Jan., 1885. 


Review of the work entitled ‘A History of British Birds, with colored illustrations of 
their Eggs’ (2 vols., roy. 8vo, London, 1883). 


Where Robin goes in Winter.<Every Other Sunday, p. 6, May, 1885. 


Birds in the Bush. <The Nation, XLI, No. 1045, p. 39, July 9, 1885. (Anon.) 
Review of Bradford Torrey’s ‘Birds in the Bush.’ 


Ridgway on New Species and Subspecies of American Birds, and on the 
Nomenclature of other Species. <Auk, II, pp. 290-293, July, 1885. 


Brief notices of 19 papers by R. Ridgway in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vols. V1, VII, VIII, 
1883-1885. 


Capture of Escaped Cage-birds. <Auwuk, II, p. 314, July, 1885. 


An Australian Parakeet in California and a Java Sparrow in Massachusetts, with 
comment on the capture of wild exotic and even tropical cage-birds far from their natural 
environment. 


[Annotations to] ‘Early Spring Notes from the Mountains of Southern Arizona,’ 
by W. E. D. Scott. <Auk, II, pp. 348-356, Oct., 1885. 


Technical notes on Turdus unalasce auduboni (p. 349), Certhia familiaris mexicana (p. 
350), Catherpes mexicanus conspersus (p. 350), Troglodytes aédon mariane (p. 351), Junco 
cinereus palliatus (p. 354). 


Sharpe’s Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum. <Auwk, II, pp. 365- 
368, Oct., 1885. 


Review of Vol. X (Fringilliformes, Part I), with critical comment on questions of nomen- 
clature. 


Turner’s List of the Birds of Labrador.<Avuk, II, pp. 368-369, Oct., 1885. 
See also Auk, III, p. 141. 
Review of L. M. Turner’s paper (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., VIII, 1885, pp. 233-254). 


Ridgway on New American Birds. <Avuk, II, p. 370, Oct., 1885. 
Review of five papers by R. Ridgway. 


239. 


240. 


241. 


242. 


244. 


246. 


247. 


248. 


BIRDS. Lod 


Ridgway’s List of Emended Names of North American Birds.<Avuk, II, 
pp. 371-372, Oct., 1885. 


Comment on R. Ridgway’s ‘Some Emended Names of North American Birds’ (Proc. 
U.S. Nat. Mus., VIII, pp. 354, 355, Sept. 2, 1885). 


A Hawk Owl (Surnia ulula caparoch) at Chatham, Mass.<Auk, II, p. 383, 
Oct., 1885. 


A Crested Auk on the Massachusetts Coast. < Auk, II, p. 388, Oct., 1885. 
Apparently Simorhynchus cristatellus. 


1886. ‘ 


Third Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union.<Auk, III, pp. 115=- 
122, Jan., 1886. e 


Murdoch on the Birds of Point Barrow, Alaska.<Awk, III, pp. 122-124, 
Jan., 1886. 
Review of John Murdoch’s Point Barrow Natural History Report. 


Bird Protection by the*A. O. U.<Forest and Stream, XXV, No. 26, Jan. 21, 
1886. (Anon.) 


Formation of a Committee on Bird Protection, etc. 


Stejneger’s Ornithological Explorations in Kamtschatka.<Avwk, III, pp. 126- 
129, Jan., 1886. 


Review of Stejneger’s ‘Results of Ornithological Explorations in the Commander Islands 
and Kamtschatka.’ 8vo, 1895 (= Bull. No. 29, U. S. Nat. Mus.). 


[John Burroughs on Ornithologists as Bird Enemies.]< Auk, III, p. 142, Jan., 
1886. 


Comment on his article in The Century in which ornithologists are classified as ‘‘among 
the worst enemies”’ of birds. 


On the Avi-fauna of Pinal County, with Remarks on Some Birds of Pima and 
Gila Counties, Arizona. By W. E. D. Scott. With Annotations by J. A. 
Allen. <Auk, III, 1886, pp. 249-258, 383-389, 421-432; IV, 1887, pp. 16-24, 
196-205; V, 1888, pp. 29-36, 159-168. 


The annotations relate to the following species: Rallus virginianus, Vol. III, p. 385; 
Porzana carolina, p. 386; Colinus ridgwayt, p. 387; Callipepla squamata, p. 388; Geococcyz 
californianus, p. 425; Dryobates stricklandi, p. 426; Melanerpes torquatus, p. 428; Jache 
latirostris, p. 432; Myitarchus cinerascens, Vol. IV, p. 18; Aphelocoma sieberi arizone, p. 21; 
Icterus parisorum, p. 23; I. cucullatus nelsoni, p. 23; Carpodacus purpureus californicus, p. 
196; Lozia curvirostris stricklandi, p. 197; Spinus tristis, p. 198; S. pinus, p. 199; Spizella 
socialis arizone, p. 200; Junco hyemalis, oregonus, annectens, caniceps, dorsalis, palliatus, 
pp. 201-202; Amphispiza bilineala, p. 202; Peucxa ruficeps boucardi, p. 203; Pipilo fuscus 
mesoleucus, p. 204; Vireo giluus swainsoni, p. 32; Vireo solitarius plumbeus and V. s. cassinii, 
p. 32; Dendroica xstiva morcomi, p. 34; Mimus polyglottus, p. 160; Catherpes mexicanus con- 
spersus, p. 162; Troglodytes aédon group, pp. 163-165; Turdus aonalashkz auduboni, p. 167. 


The Present Wholesale Destruction of Bird-Life in the United States. <Science, 
VII, No. 160, pp. 191-195, Feb. 26, 1886. Also, Bulletin No. 1, of the A. O. 
U. Committee on Protection of Birds, pp. 1-5, March, 1886. 


138 


249. 


250. 


251. 


252. 


250. 


204. 


255. 


256. 


257. 


258. 


259. 


260. 


261. 


262. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Destruction of Birds for Millinery Purposes. < Science, VII, No. 160, pp. 196- 
197, Feb. 26, 1886. Also, Bull. No. 1, A. O. U. Committee on Protection of 
Birds, pp. 6-7, March, 1886. (Anon.) 


The Relation of Birds to Agriculture. <Science, VII, No. 160, pp. 201-202, 
Feb. 26, 1886. Also, Bull. No. 1, A. O. U. Committee on Protection of Birds, 
pp. 11-12, March, 1886. (Anon.) 


Bird-Laws. <Science, Vol. VII, No. 160, pp. 202-204, Feb. 26, 1886. Also, 
Bull. No. 1, A. O. U. Committee on Protection of Birds, pp. 12-14. (Anon.) 


An Appeal to the Women of the Country in Behalf of the Birds. <Science, 
VII, No. 166, pp. 204-205, Feb. 26, 1886. Also, Bull. No. 1, A. O. U. Com- 
mittee on Protection of Birds, pp. 14-15. March, 1886. 


Protection of Birds by Legislation. <Forest and Stream, X XVII, No. 16, pp. 
304-305, Nov. 11, 1886. Also, Bull. No. 2, of the A. O. U. Committee on 
Protection of Birds, pp. 1-7, Nov., 1886. 


Signed by the Committee, but written by J. A. A., and published with articles by other 
contributors. 


Capture of a Pair of Wild Hybrid Ducks (M allard + Muscovy) on Long Island. 
<Auk, III, pp. 274-275, April, 1886. 


The Masked Bob-White (Colinus ridgwayt) in Arizona.<Auk, III, pp. 275- 
276, April, 1886. 


[Note on an Abnormally Colored Bluebird (Sialia sialis).|<Auk, III, p. 282, 
footnote, April, 1886. 


The A. O. U. Check-List of North American Birds. <Auk, III, pp. 397-398, 
July, 1886. 


Review of the first edition. Descriptive account, following a critical review of the ‘Code 
and Check-List’ by David Starr Jordan. ’ 


Note on Two*Specimens of the Snowy Plover from the Indian Territory. < Auk, 
III, p. 409, July, 1886. 


‘Aptoso-Chromatism.’<Auk, III, pp. 413-414, July, 1886. 


ee 


Criticism of Mr. Hoxie’s theory respecting ‘‘a ‘moultless color change’ in the feathers of 


birds,”’ designated *‘Aptoso-Chromatism.’ 


‘The Standard Natural History’ — ‘Birds.’ <Auk, III, pp. 473-474, Oct., 
1886. 
Review of Vol. IV of this work (imp. 8vo, Boston, 1885). 


Agialitis meloda circumcincta on the Atlantic Coast.<Auk, ILI, pp. 482-483, 
Oct., 1886. 


In New Jersey and Maine. 


A Revised List of the Birds of Massachusetts. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
I, No. 7, pp. 221-271, July, 1886. 


An annotated list of 340 species, plus 4 species extirpated, 4 introduced, and 19 of probable 
occurrence. The third and last list of the birds of Massachusetts published by this author. 


263. 


264. 


265. 


266. 


267. 


268. 


269. 


270. 


271. 


272. 


273. 


274. 


275. 


276. 


BIRDS. 139 


The Masked Bob-White (Colinus ridgwayt) of Arizona, and its Allies. << Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., I, No. 7, pp. 273-290, with col. pl., July, 1886. 


The Type Specimen of Colinus ridgwayi.< Auk, III, p. 483, Oct., 1886. 


Stated to be in the collection of G. Frean Morcom, of Chicago. 


Three Interesting Birds in the American Museum of Natural History: Ammo- 
dramus leconteii, Helinaia swainsoni, and Saxicola enanthe.<Auk, III, pp. 
489-490, Oct., 1886. 


The Leconte’s Sparrow was taken by Prince Maximilian in 1832-34, some ten years 
before the discovery of the species by Audubon. 


Bird Destruction. <Science, VIII, No. 188, pp. 118-119, Aug. 6, 1886. 


1887. 


Stejneger on Japanese Woodpeckers. < Auk, IV, pp. 63-64, Jan., 1887. 


Notice of Dr. L. Stejneger’s ‘Review of Japanese Birds, I. The Woodpeckers’ (Proce. 
U. S. Nat. Mus., 1886, pp. 200-201). 


Ferrari-Perez on the Birds of Mexico. <Auk, IV, p. 65, Jan., 1887. 


Notice of Fernando Ferrari-Perez’s ‘Catalogue of Animals collected by the Geogr. and 
Expl. Comm. of the Republic of Mexico,’ in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1886, pp. 125-199 (birds, 
pp. 130-182). 


Fourth Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union. <Auk, IV, pp. 56-61, 
Jan., 1887. 


A Further Note on Colinus ridgwayi. < Auk, IV, pp. 74-75, Jan., 1887. 


Additional specimens noted, including two early examples in Mr. Henshaw’s collection. 


[Note on Florida Specimens of Dendroica discolor.|< Auk, IV, p. 135, footnote, 
April, 1887. 


Sclater’s Catalogue of the Coerebide, Tanagride, and Icteride.<Auk, IV, 
pp. 149-150, April, 1887. 
Review of Vol. XI of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Ridgway’s Nomenclature of Colors and Ornithologists’ Compendium. <Auk, 
IV, pp. 151-152, April, 1887. 


Review of R. Ridgway’s work entitled ‘A Nomenclature of Colors for Naturalists, and 
Compendium of Useful Knowledge for Ornithologists’ (8vo, Boston, 1886). 


[The Redpolls of Massachusetts.]<Auk, IV, p. 164, April, 1887. 


A note of explanation, in reply to a communication by Mr. W. Brewster. 


[The Antedating of Papers and Works on Natural History.] <Auk, IV, p. 176, 
April, 1887. See also op. cit., p. 270. 


[Additions in the Department of Ornithology at the American Museum of 
Natural History.]<Auk, IV, pp. 270-272, July, 1887. 
They include the D. G. Elliot collection of Hummingbirds, the George N. Lawrence 


collection (with the types of about 300 species of American birds), and the H. H. Smith 
collection of birds from Chapada, Matto Grosso, Brazil; also an account of the beginning of 


140 


277. 


278. 


279. 


280. 


281. 


282. 


283. 


284. 


285. 


286. 


287. 


288. 


289. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


the Museum’s series of Bird Groups, which later came to form so striking a feature of the 
Museum’s exhibition series of birds. The acquisition of the Elliot ornithological library 
is also noted. 


The Pine Finch (Spinus pinus) Breeding at Cornwall-on-Hudson, N. Y.<Auk, 
IV, pp. 284-286, July, 1887. 

The parent birds, with the nest and eggs, were used for a ‘habitat group’ in the American 

Museum of Natural History, where it is still (1916) on exhibition. 


e 


Ridgway’s Manual of North American Birds.<Auk, IV, pp. 333-336, Oct., 
1887. 
Review of R. Ridgway’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, Philadelphia, 1887). 


Key to North American Birds.<The New York Evening Post, Dec. 21, 1887. 


Review of Dr. Coues’s ‘ Key,’ not signed. 


What is a Bird? <Audubon Magazine, I, pp. 31-33, March, 1887. 


1888. 


Fifth Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union.<Auk, V, pp. 95-100, 
Jan., 1888. 


Coues’s ‘Key to North American Birds.’ <Auk, V, pp. 101-104, Jan., 1888. 
Review of the third edition of E. Coues’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, Boston, 1887). 


[A Monument to Audubon.]<Awk, V, pp. 123-124, Jan., 1888. 


Account of the movement to erect a monument in New York City to John James Audu- 
bon. 


[The Bird Collection at the British Museum.]<Auk, V, pp. 124-125, Jan., 
1888. 
Summary of an article by R&B. Sharpe on ‘Ornithology at South Kensington.’ 


[A ‘Discovery’ in the Mechanism of Birds’ Wings.]|< Auk, V, pp. 125-126, 
Jan., 1888. See also op. cit. p. 223. 


Account of a discussion in the New York Academy of Sciences on an alleged “important 
discovery,” etc. Cf. infra, No. 303. 


Notes on the Summer Birds of Holderness, Bethlehem, and Franconia, N. H. 
(With Walter Faxon).<Auk, V, pp. 149-155, April, 1888. 


Contains ‘Notes on Birds Observed at Franconia and Bethlehem, in July and August, 
1874,’ by J. A. A., pp. 153-155, following two briefly annotated lists of birds of the same 
general region by Walter Faxon. 


[On the Wrens of the Troglodytes edon Group.]<Auk, V, pp. 163-165, April, 
1888. (Cf. supra, No. 247.) 


Seebohm’s ‘Geographical Distribution of the Charadriide.’ < Auk, V, pp. 189- 
194, April, 1888. 
Critical review of Henry Seebohm’s work of this title (4to, London, 1888). 
Ridgway on New or Little-known American Birds, etc. <<Auk, V, pp. 194-195, 
April, 1888. 


Brief notices of a number of R. Ridgway’s papers. 


290. 


291. 


292. 


293. 


294. 


295. 


296. 


ZO. 


298. 


299. 


300. 


301. 


302. 


303. 


BIRDS. 141 


Stejneger on Japanese Birds, etc.< Auk, V, pp. 195-197, April, 1888. 


Reviews of several of L. Stejneger’s recent papers on Japanese birds. 


Chamberlain’s ‘Systematic Table of Canadian Birds.’< Auk, V, pp. 198-199, 
April, 1888. 
Review of Montague Chamberlain’s work of this title (folio, St. John, N. B., 1888, pp. 14). 


Sclater and Hudson’s ‘Argentine Ornithology.’<Auk, V, pp. 199-200, April, 
1888. , 
Review of Vol. I of this well-known work (8vo, London, 1888). 


Descriptions of two New Subspecies of the Seaside Sparrow (Ammodramus 
marttimus).<Auk, V, pp. 284-287, July, 1888. 


Ammodramus maritimus peninsulz, p. 284; A.m. sennetti, p. 286. 


Description of a New Species of the Genus Tityra, from Ecuador. <Auk, V, 
pp. 287-288, July, 1888. 
Tityra nigriceps, p. 287. 


Notes on Louisiana Birds.<Auk, V, pp. 324-325, July, 1888. 


Brief notes on several species. 


[Bird Destruction for Millinery Purposes.]<Auwuk, V, pp. 334-335, July, 1888. 


Some statistics of the London sales of bird skins for this use. 


Turner’s Report of his Ornithological Observations in Alaska. <Auk, V, pp. 
409-410, Oct., 1888. 


Review of L. M. Turner’s observations in Alaska in a 4to report (No. 11) of the U.S. 
Signal Service (Birds, pp. 115-196, with 10 col. plls.). 


Sharpe’s Catalogue of the Fringillide.<Auk, V, pp. 410-413, Oct., 1888. 
Review of Vol. XII of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Shufeldt on the Osteology of the Icteride and Corvide.<Auk, V, pp. 413- 
414, Oct., 1888. 
Review of a paper by R. W. Shufeldt (Journ. Anat. and Phys., XXII, pp. 309-350). 


Note on the Correct Name of Symphemia semipalmata inornata Brewster. < 
<Auk, V, pp. 423-424, Oct., 1888. 


Claimed to be Symphemia semipalmata speculifera (Cuv.). 


Visitor’s Guide to the Collection of Birds in the American Museum of Natural 
History, Seventy-seventh Street and Eighth Avenue, New York City.— 
J. A. Allen, Curator. New York: Printed for the Museum, 1888.— 8vo, 
pp. 62, + 3ll. unpaged, and 18 cuts in text. 


List of Important Publications relating to Birds. < Riverside Natural History, 
Vol. IV, pp. 549-556, 1888. 
188 titles. 
1889. 


On the Structure of Birds in Relation to Flight, with Special Reference to 
Recent Alleged Discoveries in the Mechanism of the Wing. < Trans. New York 
Acad. Sct., pp. 89-100, 1888. 


142 


304. 


305. 


306. 


307. 


308. 


309. 


310. 
dll. 


312. 


313. 


314. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Sixth Congress of the American Ornithologists’ Union.<Auk, VI, pp. 55-58, 
Jan., 1889. 


Cooke’s ‘Report on Bird Migration in the Mississippi Valley,’<Awuk, VI, pp- 
58-61, Jan., 1889. 


Synoptic review of the work (U.S. Dept. Agric., Divis. of Economic Orn., Bull. No. 2). 


Nelson’s Report upon Natural History Collections made in Alaska. <Avuk, VI,. 
pp. 61-63, Jan., 1889. 


Review of EK. W. Nelson’s ‘Report’ (4to, Washington, 1887-1888). Birds, pp. 19-230, 
with 12 col. plls. 


Supplement to the A. O. U. Code of Nomenclature and Check-List of North 
American Birds and The Abridged A. O. U. Check-List.< Auk, VI, pp. 168- 
169, April, 1889. 

Notice of the first Check-List supplement. 


Ridgway on New or Little-known American Birds.<Auk, VI, pp. 171-178, 
April, 1889. 


Review of eight papers by R. Ridgway. 


Beckham on the Birds of Southwestern Texas. < Auk, VI, pp. 173-174, April, 
1889. 


Review of C. W. Beckham’s ‘Observations on the Birds of Southwestern Texas (Proc. 
U. S. Nat. Mus., 1887, pp. 633-696.) 


Note on the First Plumage of Colinus ridgwayt.<Auk, VI, p. 189, April, 1889. 


Sclater’s Catalogue of the Mesomyodian Passeres. < Auk, VI, pp. 266-268, July, 
1889. 


Review of Vol. XIV of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Sclater and Hudson’s Argentine Ornithology.<Awuk, VI, pp. 268-269, July, 
1889. 


Review of Vol. II (London, 1889; for Vol. I cf. supra, No. 292). Also includes corrections 
of Barrows’s ‘ Birds of the Lower Uruguay’ (in Auk, I, 1884). 


On Cyclorhis viridis (Vieill.) and its near Allies, with Remarks on other Species 
of the Genus Cyelorhis.< Bull. Amer. Mus Nat. Hist., I, pp. 128-135, June 
eplsso: 


Cyclorhis flavipectus trinitatis, subsp. nov., p. 131. 


Descriptions of New Species of South American Birds, with Remarks on vari- 
ous other little-known Species. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, pp. 137- 
151, June 28, 1889. 

Spp. nov.: (1) Thryothorus macrurus, p. 137; (2) Thryothorus longipes, p. 138; (8) Platy- 
rhynchus bifascialus, p. 141; (4) Platyrhynchus insularis, p. 143; (5) Sublegatus virescens, 


p. 149; (6) Empidonazx lawrencei (= Octhoéca flaviventris Lawr.), p- 150; (7) Thamnophilus 
doliatus mexicanus, p. 151. 


[Note on] the Breeding of the Florida Gallinule in Vermont. <Auk, VI, p. 274, 
July, 1889. 


Follows a communication on this subject by Jenness Richardson. 


BIRDS. 143 


316. Report of the U. 8. Ornithologist and Mammalogist for the Year 1888.<Auk, 


VI, p. 284, July, 1889. 


Brief summary of report by C. Hart Merriam. 


317. Barrows’s Report on the English Sparrow in North America. <Auk, VI, pp. 


326-328, Oct., 1889. 


Review of W. B. Barrows’s report on this subject, forming Bulletin I of the Division of 
Economic Ornithology and Mammalogy, U.S. Dept. Agric. 


318. Gould’s Ornithological Works. New York Evening Post, July 27, 1889. 


318a. 


alg: 


320. 


o21. 


322. 


323. 


324. 


320. 


[Anonymous.] 


Summary account of John Gould’s principal ornithological works, with a brief biogeaphical 
sketch of the author. 


Stone’s Catalogue of the Muscicapide in the Collection of the Philadelphia 
Academy of Natural Sciences. < Auk, VI, pp. 330-331, Oct., 1889. 


Review of Witmer Stone’s paper of this title (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1889, 
pp. 146-154). 


Bergtold’s List of the Birds of Buffalo and Vicinity.<Auk, VI, pp. 331-3382, 


Oct., 1889. 
Review of W. H. Bergtold’s paper (in Bull. Buffalo Naturalists’ Field Club, 1889). 


Keyes and Williams’s Preliminary Catalogue of the Birds of Iowa. <Auk, VI, 


p. 332, Oct., 1889. 
Review of their ‘Catalogue’ (in Proc. Davenport Acad. Nat. Sci., V, 1889). 


Taylor’s Catalogue of Nebraska Birds.< Auk, VI, pp. 332-333, Oct., 1889. 


Review of W. Edgar Taylor’s ‘Catalogue’ (in Ann. Rep. Nebraska State Board of Agric. 
for 1887, pp. 111-118, 1888). 


Shufeldt’s Recent Contributions to the Osteology of North American Birds. 


<Auk, VI, pp. 333-334, Oct., 1889. 
Review of four papers by Dr. R. W. Shufeldt on different groups of birds. 


Notes on a Collection of Birds from Quito.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., I, 


pp. 69-76, March 22, 1889. 


An annotated list of 79 species. Manacus Brisson antedates Chiromacheris Cabanis 
(p. 73). 


List of Birds Collected in Bolivia by Dr. H. H. Rusby, with Field Notes by 


the Collector. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Il, 77-112, March 22, 1889. 


Annotated list of 267 species, the following new: (1) Empidonax bolivianus, p. 86; (2) 
Chiroxiphia pareola boliviana, p. 87; (3) Enicornis striata, p. 89; (4) Leptasthenura fuscescens, 
p. 90; (5) Leptasthenura fuliginiceps boliviana, p. 91; (6) Synallaxis griseiventris, p. 91; (7) 
Anabazenops immaculatus, p. 96; (8) Picolaptes oblectus, p. 94; (9) Myrmochanes (gen. nov.) 
hypoleucus, p. 95; (10) Conopophaga rusbyi, p. 96; (11) Phlogopsis notata, p. 97; (12) 
Scytalopus bolivianus, p. 96. 


Remarks on Individual and Seasonal Variation in a large Series of Elainea 


from Chapada, Matto Grosso, Brazil, with a Revision of the Species of the 
restricted Genus Elainea.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., I, pp. 183-208, 
Oct. 31, 1889. 


Critical comment on various alleged species of the genus. 


144 


326. 


327. 


328. 


329. 


330. 


331. 


332. 


O30. 


O04. 


300. 


336. 


307. 


338. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


On the Maximilian Types of South American Birds in the American Museum 
of Natural History.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, pp. 209-276, Dec., 
1889. 


About 160 species formally considered and incidental comment on 10 others. See also 
infra, No. 352. 


1890. 


To What Extent is it Profitable to Recognize Geographical Forms among 
North American Birds? <Auk, VII, pp. 1-9, Jan., 1890. 


A protest against too fine splitting. 


Seventh Congress of the American Ornithologists’ Union. <Awuk, VII, pp. 66- 
71, Jan., 1890. 


Waterhouse’s ‘Index Generum Avium.’<Awuk, VII, pp. 71-73, Jan., 1890. 


Review, with critical comment, of F. H. Waterhouse’s work of this title (8vo, London, 
1889). 


Blanchard on the Nomenclature of Organized Beings. < Auk, VII, pp. 73-74, 
Jan., 1890. 


Review of Blanchard’s Report ‘De la Nomenclature des étres organisés,’ presented to the 
Congrés International de Zoologie, Paris, 1889. 


Menzbier’s Ornithology of Turkestan. <Auk, VII, pp. 78-79, Jan., 1890. 


Review of the first livraison of the work. 


Note on Thryothorus ludovicianus miamensis.<Auk, VII, pp. 115-117, 
April, 1890. 
Inedited matter in a paper by W. E. D. Scott on Birds of the Gulf Coast of Florida. 


Saunders’s Manual of British Birds. < Auk, VII, pp. 195-196, April, 1890. 


Review of ‘An Illustrated Manual of British Birds,’ by Howard Saunders (8vo, London, 
1889). 


Notes on Sport and Ornithology. <Auk, VII, pp. 196-197, April, 1890. 


Review of a work of this title by the late Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria (8vo, London, 
1889). 


Ridgway on the Genus Ziphocolaptes.< Auk, VII, pp. 271-272, July, 1890. 


Notice of R. Ridgway’s ‘A Review of the} Genus Xiphocolaptes of Lesson’ (Proc. U. S. 
Nat. Mus., 1889, pp. 1-20). 


Ridgway on the Genus Sclerurus.<Auk, VII, pp. 272-273, July, 1890. 


Notice of R. Ridgway’s ‘A Review of the Genus Sclerurus of Swainson’ (Proc. U. S. 
Nat. Mus., 1889, pp. 21-31). 


Ridgway on Birds from the Galapagos Islands, the Abrolhos, the Island of 


Santa Lucia, and the Straits of Magellan. <Auk, VII, pp. 273-274, July, 1890. 

Notice of ‘Scientific Results of Explorations by the U. S. Fish Commission Steamer 
Albatross. No. 1, Birds Collected on the Galapagos Islands in 1888,’ and ‘No. 2, Birds 
Collected on the Island of Santa Lucia,’ etc. by R. Ridgway (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1889, 
pp. 101-139). 


Chapman on the Genus Xiphorhynchus. < Auk, p. 274, July, 1890. 


Notice of ‘A Review of the Genus Xiphorhynchus Swainson, with Descriptions of two new 
Species,’ by F. M. Chapman (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 11, pp. 153-162, July, 1889). 


309. 


340. 


341. 


342. 


343. 


344. 


345. 


346. 


347. 


348. 


349, 


300. 


BIRDS. 145 


Stejneger and Lucas on Pallas’s Cormorant.<Auk, VII, pp. 276-277, July, 
1890. 


Review of ‘Contributions to the Natural History of the Commander Islands, X.’ By 
L. Stejneger and F. A. Lucas (Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., XII, pp. 83-94, pll. ii-iv). 


Lucas on the Osteology of the Thrushes and Wrens. <Auk, VII, p. 277, July, 
1890. . 
Review of F. A. Lucas’s ‘Notes on the Osteology of the Thrushes, Miminze, and Wrens 
(Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1888, pp. 173-180). 
Shufeldt on the Relationships of the Genus Chamea. < Auk, VII, p. 278, July, 


1890. 


Review of R. W. Shufeldt’s paper ‘On the Position of Chamea in the System’ (Journ. 
Morph., III, pp. 475-502). 


Shufeldt’s ‘“‘Studies of the Macrochires.” Auk, VII, pp. 278-279, July, 1890. 
Review of his ‘Studies,’ etc.,in Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool., XX, pp. 299-394, pll. xvii—xxiv. 


. J 


Shufeldt on the Osteology of the North American Passeres.< Auk, VII, pp. 
279-280, July, 1890. 


Review of his ‘Contributions to the Comparative Osteology of Families of the North 
American Passeres,’ in Journ. Morph., III, 1889, pp. 81-112, pll. v, vi. 


Maynard’s ‘Eggs of North American Birds.’ <Auk, VII, p. 280, July, 1890. 
Review of C. J. Maynard’s work of this title (8vo, Boston, 1890). 


Anthony on New Birds from Lower California. < Auk, VII, pp. 281-282, July, 
1890. 


Review of A. W. Anthony’s paper of this title in Proc. California Acad. Sci., 2d Ser., IT, 
1889, pp. 75-82. 


Sennett on Bird Legislation. <Auk, VII, p. 282, July, 1890. 


Review of an address on the subject by G. B. Sennett, published in Rep. Board of Agric. 
Penn. for 1889. 


Description of a New Species of Jcterus from Andros Island, Bahamas. < Auk, 
VII, pp. 343-346, Oct., 1890; and zbed., VIII, 1891, pl. i (colored). 


Icterus northropi sp. nov. Description and plate republished in ‘A Naturalist in the 
Bahamas,’ a memorial volume of the late John I. Northrop (8vo, New York, 1910). 


Sclater’s Catalogue of the Tracheophone. < Auk, VII, pp. 379-380, Oct., 1890. 
Review of Vol. XV of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Dr. Merriam’s ‘Biological Survey’ of the United States.<Auk, VII, p. 414, 
Oct., 1890. 


Inception of a ‘Biological Survey’ under Dr. C. Hart Merriam, and nature of the pro- 
posed work. 


L391. 


List of the Birds of Labrador, including Ungave, East Main, Moose, and Guld 
Districts of the Hudson Bay Company, together with the Island of Anticosti. 
By Lucien M. Turner. Reprinted by the author’s permission from the 
Proceedings of the U. S. National Museum, 1885, pp. 233-254. Revised 
and brought down to date [1891], by J. A. Allen. <Packard’s ‘The Labrador 
Coast,’ pp. 406-442, 1891. 


146 


dol. 


352. 


353. 


354. 


350. 


356. 


357. 


358. 


359. 


360. 


361. 


362. 


363. 


364. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


The American Ornithologists’ Union. A Seven Years’ Retrospect. An 
Address delivered by the Retiring President at the Eighth Congress of the 
Union, Nov. 19, 1890. By J. A. Allen. Published by order of the Union, 
New York, January, 1891.— 8vo, pp. 19, and title page. 


Further Notes on Maximilian Types of South American Birds. < Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., III, pp. 199-202, Feb. 20, 1891. (Cf. supra, No. 326.) 


Rhopocichla, gen. nov., p. 199. 


[Annotations to] ‘The Birds of Andros Island, Bahamas.’ By John 1. Northrop. 
<Auk, VIII, pp. 64-80, Jan., 1891. 

Notes on: Mimus polyglottos, p. 67; M. gundlachi, p. 67; Seiurus aurocapillus, p. 68; 
Geothlypis rostrata, p. 69; Vireo crassirostris, p. 70; Myiarchus lucaysiensis, p. 72; Speotyto 
cunicularia dominicensis, p. 75; Rallus coryi, p. 77. 

Sharpe’s ‘ Catalogue of the Sturniformes.’ < Auk, VIII, pp. 90-92, Jan., 1891. 

Review of Vol. XIII of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. - 


Hargitt’s Catalogue of the Woodpeckers. <Auk, VIII, pp. 92-95, Jan., 1891. 
Review of Vol. X VIII of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Merriam’s ‘Results of a Biological Survey of the San Francisco Mountain 
Region and Desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona.’ Auk, VIII, pp. 95-98, 
Jan., 1891. 

Reyiew of C. Hart Merriam’s ‘ Results,’ etc., in North Am. Fauna, No. 3, Sept., 1891. 


Dr. Merriam’s Exploration of the Death Valley Region.<Awuk, VIII, pp. 
122-1238, Jan., 1891. 


Announcement of the Expedition. 


Description of a New Species of Mimocichla, from the Island of Dominica, 
West Indies.< Auk, VIII, pp. 217-218, April, 1891. 
Mimocichla verrillorum = M. ardesiaca albiventris Scl. of slightly earlier date (See Auk, 
VITI, 1891, p. 317.) 
The Ornithology of the ‘Century Dictionary.’<Auk, VIII, pp. 222-224, 
April, 1891. 
Review of Dr. E. Coues’s ornithological contributions to the ‘Century Dictionary.’ 
Nicholson’s Translation of Sundevall’s ‘Tentamen.’ < Auk, VIII, pp. 227-228, 
April, 1891. 
Review of the work (8vo, London, 1889). 
Goss’s ‘History of the Birds of Kansas.’ <Awk, VIII, pp. 228-230, April, 1891. 
Review of N.S. Goss’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, Topeka, 1891). 


Giatke’s ‘Die Vogelwarte Helgoland.’<Avwk, VIII, pp. 299-300, July, 1891. 


Review of Heinrich Gatke’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, Braunschweig, 1891). 


Cory’s ‘Birds of the Bahama Islands.’ <Auk, VIII, pp. 300-301, July, 1891. 


Review of the revised edition, 1890. 


Grant’s ‘Our Common Birds [and how to know them].’<Avuk, VIII, p. 301, 
July, 1891. 
Review of John B. Grant’s work of this title (New York, 1891). 


365. 


366. 


367. 


368. 


369. 


370. 


atl. 
372. 


373. 


O74, 


375. 


376. 


377.6 


BIRDS. 147 


Thompson’s ‘Birds of Manitoba.’< Auk, VIII, pp. 301-302, July, 1889. 
Review of E. E. Thompson’s paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIII, 1890, pp. 457-643, 
pl. xxxviii. ; 


Canadian Bird Notes.<Auk, VIII, pp. 302-303, July, 1891. 


Review of ornithological papers in Trans. Canadian Inst., 1890. 


Stone’s List of ‘Birds Collected in Yucatan and Southern Mexico’ on the 
Heilprin Expedition.< Auk, VIII, p. 308, July, 1891. 
Review of Witmer Stone’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1890, pp. 201-218. 


Townsend on the Birds of the Coast and Islands of Upper and Lower Cali- 
fornia. <Auk, VIII, p. 305, July, 1891. 


Review of Charles H. Townsend’s ‘Birds from the Coasts of Western North America 
and adjacent Islands’ (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIII, 1890, pp. 131-142). 


Palmer on Birds observed during the Cruise of the ‘Grampus.’<Auk, VIII, 
p. 305, July, 1891. 


Review of William Palmer’s paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIII, 1890, pp. 249-262, 
on birds observed in Gulf of St. Lawrence, and at Funk Island, etc. 


Lucas on the Anatomy and History of the Great Auk.<Auk, VIII, p. 306, 
July, 1891. | 
Review of F. A. Lucas’s paper in Rep. U. S. Nat. Mus., 1887-88, pp. 493-529, pill. 
bxxi-boxiili. 
Capture of Geothlypis poliocephala palpebralis in Cameron County, Texas. < 
Auk, VIII, p. 316, July, 1891. 


Note on Mimocichla verrillorum.<Auk, VIII, p. 317, July, 1891. 
Name antedated by Mimocichla albiventris (Scl.). See supra, No. 358. 


[Plates of Otophanes mcleodii Brewster, and of two species of Megascops]. < 
Auk, VIII, p. 320, Oct., 1891. 


Explanatory note. 


Sharpe’s ‘Review of Recent Attempts to Classify Birds.’ < Auk, VIII, pp. 379- 
381, -Oct., 1891. 


Notice of Dr. R. B. Sharpe’s address on this subject before Second Int. Orn. Congress, 
Budapest, 1891. 


Hornaday’s Handbook of Taxidermy and Zodlogical Collecting. <Auk, VIII, 
pp. 381-383, Oct., 1891. 
Review of Wm. T. Hornaday’s work of this title (vo, New York, 1891). 


Butler’s Birds of Indiana.<Auk, VIII, pp. 383-384, Oct., 1891. 
Review of Amos W. Butler’s ‘Birds of Indiana’ (8vo, pp. 135). 


Colburn and Morris’s ‘Birds of the Connecticut Valley in Massachusetts.’ < 
Auk, VIII, pp. 384-385, Oct., 1891. 
Review of their privately printed brochure of this title (16mo, pp. 24, Springfield, Mass.). 


Merriam’s List of Birds Observed in Idaho. <Auk, VIII, p. 385, Oct., 1891. 


Review of list in NV. Am. Fauna, No. 5. 


148 


379. 


380. 


381. 


O82. 


383. 


384. 


385. 


386. 


387. 


388. 


O89. 


390. 


391. 


392. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Maynard’s ‘Contributions to Science.’ <Avwk, VIII, pp. 385-387, Oct., 1891. 
Notice of 16 papers relating to ornithology contained in Vol. I of his work of this title. 


On a Collection of Birds from Chapada, Matto Grosso, Brazil, made by Mr. 
Herbert H. Smith. Part I, Oscines.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, pp. 
337-880, Sept. 29, 1891. 


87 species here treated: Callista margarite, sp. nov., p. 351; Zonotrichia capensis costari- 
censis, subsp. nov., p. 374. 


1892. 


The New Nuttall. < Auk, IX, pp. 59-61, Jan., 1892. 


Review of Montague Chamberlain’s ‘A Popular Handbook of the Ornithology of the 
United States and Canada, based on Nuttall’s Manual.’ 2 vols., 8vo, Boston, 1891. 


mm 
Shufeldt’s ‘Myology of the Raven.’ < Auk, IX, p. 62, Jan., 1892. 
Review of R. W. Shufeldt’s work of this title (vo, London and New York, 1890). 


Bollegs ‘Land of the Lingering Snow.’ <Auk, IX, p. 62, Jan., 1892. 
Review of Frank Bolles’s work of this title (12mo, Boston and New York, 1891). 


Keyser’s ‘ Bird-dom.’ < Auk, [X, p. 68, Jan., 1892. 
Review of Leander Keyser’s work thus entitled (12mo, Boston, 1891). 


Packard’s ‘The Labrador Coast.’ < Auk, IX, p. 171, April, 1892. 
Review of A. S. Packard’s work thus entitled (8vo, New York, 1891). 


Lucas on the Osteology of the Paride, Sitta, and Chamea.<Auk, IX, p. 172, 
April, 1892. 


Review of a paper by F. A. Lucas entitled ‘Notes on the Osteology of the Paride, ue 
and Chamea, in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIII, 1890, pp. 337-345, pl. xxvii. 


G. K. Cherrie on Costa Rican Birds. < Auk, IX, p. 178, April, 1892. 


Notice of his paper entitled ‘Descriptions of New Genera, Species, and Subspecies of Birds 
from Costa Rica,’ in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIV, 1892, pp. 337-346. 


Shufeldt on the Osteology of Arctic and Sub-Arctic Water Birds. <Auk, IX, 
pp. 173-174, April, 1892. 


Review of Parts V-IX, of R. W. Shufeldt’s ‘Contributions to the Comparative Osteology,’ 
etc., in Vols. XXIV and XXV, Journ. Anat. and Phys., 1890-91. 


Shufeldt on the Osteology and Classification of the North American Pigeons, 
Woodpeckers, and Kites.< Auk, IX, p. 174, April, 1892. 
Notice of four papers by R. W. Shufeldt. 


Ridgway on New or Little-known Central American and South American 
Birds. <Auk, IX, pp. 174-175, April, 1892. 
Short notices of nine papers by R. Ridgway in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIV, 1891. 


Chapman on the ‘Origin of the Avifauna of the Bahamas.’ < Auk, IX, pp. 179- 
180, April, 1892. 
Review of F. M. Chapman’s paper of this title in Amer. Nat., June, 1891, pp. 528-539. 


Sclater on the Geographical Distribution of Birds.<Auk, IX, pp. 1838-184, 
April, 1892. 


393. 


394. 


395. 


396. 


397. 


398. 


399. 


400. 


401. 


402. 


403. 


404. 


405. 


BIRDS. 149 


Review of an address on this subject read before the Second Int. Orn. Congress, Budapest, 
1891 (Ibis, 1891, pp. 514-527). 


Sclater and Shelley on the Scansores and Coccyges. < Auk, IX, p. 184, April, 
1892. 


Review of Vol. XIX of British Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Hartert’s Catalogue of the Birds in the Museum of the Senkenberg Natural 
History Society.< Auk, IX, p. 185, April, 1892. 
Review of the work (8vo, Frankfort a. M., Jan., 1891). 


Leverkuhn’s ‘Fremde Eier im Nest.’ < Auk, IX, pp. 185-186, April, 1892. 
Notice of Paul Leverkiihn’s work of this title (vo, Berlin, 1891). 


Jaickel’s Birds of Bavaria. <Auwk, IX, p. 186, April, 1892. 
Notice of Andreas Johannes Jackel’s work on this subject (Svo, Miinchen und Leipzig, 
1891). 
The North American Species of Colaptes, considered with special reference to 


the Relationships of C. auratus and C. cafer.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
IV, 1892, pp. 21-44, and map, March 8, 1892. 


Hybridization on a large scale shown to obtain between C. auratus and C. cafer. 


The Blackfronted Warbler (Dendroica nigrifrons Brewst.).<Auk, IX, p. 207, 
April, 1892. 
Explanatory note respecting a colored plate of this species published in the preceding 
number of The Auk (IX, pl. i, Jan., 1891). 
Salvadori’s Catalogue of the Parrots.< Auk, IX, pp. 277-279, July, 1892. 
Review of Vol. XX of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds, with critical nomenclatural 
comment. 
Oustalet on the Birds of Patagonia. << Auk, IX, p. 281, July, 1892. 
Review of the ‘Oiseaux’ of the Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn (4to, pp. 341, pll. 6). 


Stone on the Crows, Birds of Paradise, and Orioles in the Museum of the 
Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences.< Auk, IX, p. 282, July, 1892. 
Review of Witmer Stone’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1891, pp. 441-450. 


The Wanton Destruction of Bird Life in America. <Our Animal Friends, XIX, 
pp. 126-128, 150-152, Feb. and March, 1892. 


Notice of some Venezuelan Birds Collected by Mrs. H. H. Smith. <Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, 1892, pp. 51-59, April, 6, 1892. 


48 species and subspecies, the following new: (1) Ramphocelus atrosericeus capitalis, 
p. 51; (2) Lophotriccus subcristatus, p. 53; (3) Picumnus obsoletus, p. 55. 


Description of a New Gallinule from Gough Island. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist., 1V, 1892, pp. 57-58, May 9, 1892. 


Porphyriornis comeri, gen. et sp. nov. 


Bendire’s ‘Life Histories of North American Birds.’ <Auk, IX, pp. 375-376, 
Oct., 1892. 


Review of Part I of this work (4to, Special Bulletin, U. S. Nat. Mus., 1892). 


150 


406. 


406a. 


407. 


408. 


409. 


410. 


411. 


412. 


413. 


414. 


415. 


416. 


417. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Ridgway’s ‘The Hummingbirds.’ < Auk, IX, pp. 376-377, Oct., 1892. 
Review of paper published in Rep. U.S. Nat. Mus. for 1890, pp. 255-383, pll. i-xliii. 


Merriam on the Life Areas of North America. <<Auk, IX, pp. 877-382, Oct., 


1892. 

Review of Dr. Merriam’s Presidential Address before the Biological Society of Washington, 
Feb. 6, 1892, entitled “The Geographic Distribution of Life in North America with Special 
Reference to the Mammalia’ (in Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, VII, pp. 1-64). 


Suchetet on Hybridity in Birds. <Auk, IX, pp. 382-383, Oct., 1892. 
Review of ‘Les Oiseaux Hybrides rencontrés 4 l’état sauvage par André Suchetet.’ Troi- 
sieme Partie. Les Passereaux. 


On a Collection of Birds from Chapada, Matto Grosso, Brazil, made by Mr. 
H. H. Smith, Part II, Tyrannide. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, pp. 331- 
350, Dec., 1892. 


1893. 


British Museum Catalogue of the Picaria.<Auk, X, pp. 66-69, Jan., 1898. 
Review of Vols. X VI and XVII of Catalogue of Birds in the British Museum. 


Cory’s ‘Catalogue of West Indian Birds.’ < Auk, X, pp. 69-70, Jan., 1898. 
Review of the Ist ed. (4to, Boston, 1892). 


Dixon’s ‘The Migration of Birds.’ < Auk, X, 70-73, Jan., 18938. 


Review, with extended critical comment, of Charles Dixon’s ‘The Migration of Birds, 
an attempt to reduce Avian Season-Flight to Law (8vo, London, 1892). 


[Pterylography — A Neglected Branch of Ornithology.]<Auk, X, pp. 94-95, 


Jan., 1893. 
Remarks supplementary to an article of this title by Hubert Lyman Clark. 


The Geographical Origin and Distribution of North American Birds, con- 
sidered in Relation to Faunal Areas of North America.<Awuk, X, pp. 97- 
150, pll. iii-v (maps), April, 1893. ’ 


Keeler on the ‘Evolution of the Colors of North American Land Birds.’ < Auk, 
X, pp. 189-195, April, 1893. 
Review of Charles A. Keeler’s work of this title (Svo, San Francisco, 1893), with much 
critical commentary. 


Beddard’s ‘Animal Coloration.’ < Auk, X, pp. 195-199, April, 1893. 


Review of Frank E. Beddard’s ‘ Animal Coloration, an Account of the Principal Facts and 
Theories relating to the Colors and Markings of Animals’ (8vo, London, 1892). 


Hawks and Owls in their Relation to Agriculture.<Auk, X, pp. 199-201, 
April, 1893. 
Review of Dr. A. K. Fisher’s work of this title, forming Bull. No. 3, Division of Orn. and 
Mam., U. S. Dept. Agriculture. 


Bolles’s ‘Chronicles.’ <Awk, X, pp. 201-202, April, 1893. 
Review of Frank Bolles’s ‘At the North of Bear-camp Water: Chronicles of a Stroller 
in New England from July to December’ (12mo, Boston and New York, 1893). 


418. 


419. 


420. 


421. 


422. 


423. 


424. 


425. 


426. 


427. 


428. 


429. 


430. 


431. 


BIRDS. ier ey 


Foster’s Bibliography of the Ornithological Writings of George N. Lawrence. < 
Auk, X, p. 202, April, 1893. 
Review of L. S. Foster’s work of this title (Bull. No. 40, U.S. National Museum, 1892). 


Ornithology of the Death Valley Expedition.<Auk, X, pp. 285-288, July, 


1893. 
Review of Part II (Report on the Birds, by A. K. Fisher), of the Death Valley Expedition, 
a Biological Survey of Parts of California, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah (North Amer. Fauna, 
No. 7, May 31, 1893). 
The Faunal Position of Lower California.< Auk, X, pp. 306-307, July, 1893. 
Reply to remarks by Dr. C. Hart Merriam under the same title (J. c., pp. 305, 306). 


Shufeldt on Fossil Birds from Oregon. <Auk, X, pp. 348-345, Oct., 1893. 
Review of ‘A Study of the Fossil Avifauna of the Equus Beds of the Oregon Desert,’ 
by Dr. R. W. Shufeldt Gin Journ. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, XI, pp. 389-425, pll. xv—xvii). 
Shufeldt on Ichthyornis, and on the Classification of the Longipennes. < Auk, 
X, p. 345, Oct., 1893. 
Notice of two papers by Dr. R. W. Shufeldt (Journ. Anat. and Phys., XX VII, pp. 336-342, 
and Amer. Nat., 1893, pp. 233-237). 
The Affinities of Hummingbirds and Swifts. < Auk, X, pp. 345-346, Oct., 1893. 
Notice of papers by R. Ridgway, R. W. Shufeldt, and F. A. Lucas on this subject. 


Food Habits of Birds. < Auk, X, p. 347, Oct., 1893. 


Notice of papers on this subject by W. B. Barrows and F. E. L. Beal in Dr. C. Hart 
Merriam’s ‘Report of the Ornithologist and Mammalogist’ for 1892 (Rep. Secretary of 
Agriculture for 1892, pp. 181-200). 


Hasbrouck on ‘Evolution and Dichromatism in the Genus Megascops.’ < Auk, 
X, pp. 347-351, Oct., 1893. 


Critical review of E. M. Hasbrouck’s paper on this subject in Amer. Nat., 1893, pp. 521- 
533, 638-649. 


Cook’s ‘Birds of Michigan.’ < Auk, X, pp. 351-352, Oct., 1893. 
Review of A. J. Cook’s ‘Birds of Michigan,’ (Bull. 94, Michigan Agric. Station, State 
Agric. College). 


Averill’s List of the Birds of Bridgeport. < Auk, X, pp. 352-353, Oct., 1893. 
Notice of a brochure by ©. K. Averill, Jr. (8vo, pp. 19, 1892). 


Summer Birds of Greene County, Pa.<Auk, X, p. 353, Oct., 1893. 
Notice of a brochure of this title, by J. Warren Jacobs (8vo, pp. 15, 1893). 


Nutting’s Zodélogical Explorations on the Lower Saskatchewan River. <Auk, 
X, pp. 353-354, Oct., 1893. 


Notice of C. C. Nutting’s ‘Report’ on his Explorations, etc. (Bull. Lab. Nat. Hist. Iowa 
State Univ., I1, No. 3, pp. 235-293, Jan., 1893). 


‘A New List of Chilian Birds.’ < Auk, X, p. 354, Oct., 18938. 
Notice of H. B. James and P. L. Sclater’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, London, 1892). 


Newton’s ‘A Dictionary of Birds.’ Part I.<Auk, X, pp. 857-360, Oct., 1893. 
Extended review of the first part (A-Ga; 8vo, London, 1893). 


152 


432. 


433. 


434. 


435. 


436. 


437. 


438. 


439. 


440. 


441. 


442. 


443. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


On a Collection of Birds from Chapada, Matto Grosso. Parts III and IV, 
Pipride to Rheide.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, 1893, pp. 107-158, 
July 19, 1893. 


Spp. and subspp. nov: (1) Pygmornis chapadensis, pp. 122; (2) Piaya cayana cabanisi, 
p. 136; (3) Buteo albicaudatus sennetli, p. 144; 

This concludes the paper, which comprises a list of 324 species, with annotations and 
comment on allied species in a number of groups. Part IV (pp. 152-158), ‘Oological Notes,’ 
contains notes on the nests and eggs of 27 species. 


Cereba versus Certhiola. < Auk, X, pp. 369-370, Oct., 1893.. 
Cereba antedates Certhiola by 28 years, with C. flaveola as type by monotypy. 


The Evolution of the Colors of North American Land Birds.<Auk, X, pp. 
377-380, Oct., 1898. 


Reply to Mr. Keeler’s rejoinder (I. c., pp. 375-377) to a review of his ‘Evolution of Colors 
in North American Land Birds’ (Auk. X, pp. 189-195; see supra, No. 414). 


Nehrling’s ‘Our Native Birds of Song and Beauty.’ < Auk, X, p. 387, Oct., 1893. 


Brief notice cf Volume I (4to). 


List of Mammals and Birds Collected in Northeastern Sonora and North- 
western Chihuahua, Mexico, on the Lumholtz Archeological Expedition, 
1890-92.< Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, 1893, pp. 27-42. 

Annotated list of 162 species of birds. 


1894. 


Newton’s ‘A Dictionary of Birds.’ Part II.<Avwuk, XI, pp. 56-60, Jan., 1894. 
Review of Part II (Ga-Moa). (8vo, London, 1893.) (See supra, No. 431.) 


Salvadori’s Catalogue of the Pigeons. < Auk, XI, pp. 60-62, Jan., 1894. 


Review of Vol. X XI of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds, with comment on nomen- 
clatural points. 


Elliot’s Monograph of the Pittide. Parts I and II.<Awk, XI, pp. 62-63, 
Jan., 1894. 
Review of D. G. Elliot’s work of this title, 2d ed. (folio, London, April, 1893). 


Sharpe on the Zoégraphical Areas of the World.<Auk, XI, pp. 63-65, Jan., 
1894. 


Review of R. Bowdler Sharpe’s paper on this subject (Vat. Sci., III, Aug., 1893, pp. 100- 
108). ‘‘But the recognition and definition of an Arctic Zone, or ‘Realm,’ as Mr. Allen calls 
it, is a fact which must hencefcrward be admitted by all ornithologists.” 


Non-significance of albinistic eggs of the Marsh Wren. <Auk, XI, p. 81,"Jan., 
1894. 


Comment on theoretical suggestions of Dr. L. B. Bishop. 


First Plumages. <Auk, XI, pp. 91-93, pl. 11, Jan., 1894. 
Seiurus aurocapillus, ad. and juve 
Anthony on the Birds of San Pedro Martir, Lower California. <Auk, XI, pp. 
167-168, April, 1894. 
Review of A. W. Anthony’s paper of this title (Zoe, IV, pp. 228-247). 


444, 


445. 


446. 


447. 


448. 


449, 


450. 


451. 


452. 


453. 


454. 


455. 


456. 


457. 


BIRDS. 153 


Short’s Birds of Western New York. <Auk, XI, p. 168, April, 1894. 
Notice of Ernest H. Short’s brochure of this title (8vo, Chili, N. Y., pp. 13, 1893). 


Ridgway on the Genus Mytarchus, etc.< Auk, XI, pp. 168-170, April, 1894. 
Notice of five papers on American birds, by R. Ridgway, in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XVI, 
pp. 605-614, 663-686. 
Stejneger on Japanese Birds. < Auk, XI, p. 170, April, 1894. 
Notice of Stejneger’s ‘Third Instalment of Japanese Birds,’ etc. (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 
XVI, 1893, pp. 615-638). 
Ogilvie-Grant’s ‘Catalogue of the Game Birds.’<Auk, XI, pp. 171-173, 
April, 1894. 
Review of Vol. XXII of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds, 1893, with critical 
comment. 
Mcllwraith’s ‘Birds of Ontario.’<Auk, XI, pp. 240-241, July, 1894. 
Review of Thomas Mcllwraith’s work of this title, 2d ed. (8vo, Toronto, 1894). 


Sharpe’s Catalogue of the Fulicarize and Alectorides.<Auk, XI, pp. 242-243, 
July, 1894. 
Review, with critical comment, of Vol. X XIII of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds 


(1894). 


Elliot’s Monograph of the Pittide. Part III.<Auk, XI, p. 2438, July, 1894. 
Notice of Part III, Feb., 1894. (Cf. supra, No. 439.) 


Mrs. Wright’s ‘The Friendship of Nature.’<Auk, XI, p. 314, Oct., 1894. 
Notice of Mrs. Mabel Osgood Wright’s book of this title (8vo, New York and London, 
1894). 
Shufeldt’s ‘Comparative Odlogy of North American Birds.’<Auwuk, XI, pp. 
314-315, Oct., 1894. 
Critical notice of R. W. Shufeldt’s paper of this title, in Report U. S. Nat. Mus. for 1892 
(1894), pp. 461-493. 
Stone on Old World Ralline.<Auwk, XI, p. 317, Oct., 1894. 
Notice of Witmer Stone’s ‘Review of Old World Rallinz,’ in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila- 
delphia, 1894, pp. 130-149. 
Wallace on “‘ Palearctic” and “ Nearctic.” <Auk, XI, pp. 318-319, Oct., 1894. 
Critical review of A. R. Wallace’s ‘Palearctic and Nearctic Regions compared as regards 


the Families and Genera of their Mammalia and Birds’ (Nat. Sci., IV, 1894, pp. 435-445). 


[Notice of George K. Cherrie’s ornithological work in Costa Rica].<Auk, XI, 
p. 340, Oct., 1894. 


“*Mr. Cherrie has made an enviable record for himself in Costa Rica, displaying an energy 
and a capacity for work rarely equalled.”’ 


Fashion Journals and Bird Destruction. <Auk, XI, p. 342, Oct., 1894. 


Comment on an article in Harper’s Bazaar of Aug. 18, 1894. 


1895. 


Elliot’s Monograph of the Pittide. Part IV.<Auk, XII, pp. 65-66, Jan., 
1895. 
Review of Part IV, issued September, 1894. (Cf. supra, Nos. 439, 450.) 


154 


458. 


459. 


460. 


461. 


462. 


463. 


A64. 


465. 


A66. 


A467. 


A468. 


469. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Two Popular Bird Books. <Auk, XII, pp. 66-67, Jan., 1895. 


Review of ‘In Bird Land,’ by Leander S. Keyser, and ‘The Birds’ Calendar,’ by H. E. 
Parkhurst. 


Ridgway on New Birds from the Galapagos Islands. <Awuk, XII, pp. 70-71, 
Jan., 1895. 


Review of R. Ridgway’s ‘Descriptions of Twenty-two new Species of Birds from the 
Galapagos Islands’ (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XVII, pp. 357-370). 


Lucas on the Affinities of the Coerebide. <Auk, XII, pp. 71-72, Jan., 1895. 


Review of F. A. Lucas’s paper ‘Notes on the Anatomy and Affinities of the Coerebidz 
and other American Birds’ (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XVII, pp. 299-312). 


Rhoads’s Reprint of Ord’s North American Zoology. <Auk, XII, pp. 72-73, 
Jan., 1895. 


Review of S. N. Rhoads’s reprint of George Ord’s ‘Zoélogy’ in Guthrie’s Geography (8vo, 
Haddonfield, N. J., 1894). 


Reichenow’s Birds of German East Africa. < Auk, XII, pp. 73-74, Jan., 1905. 
Review of Dr. A. Reichenow’s ‘Die Végel Deutsch-Ost-Afrikas’ (roy. 8vo, Berlin, 1894). 


[Work of Dr. C. Hart Merriam, as Ornithologist and Mammalogist of U. 8. 
Dept. of Agric. for 1893.]< Auk, XII, p. 98, Jan., 1895. 
Notice of his ‘Report’ for the year 1893. 


Shufeldt on the Osteology of Cranes and Rails.<Awuk, XII, pp. 172-173, 
April, 1895. 
Notice of R. W. Shufeldt’s paper on this subject in Journ. Anat. and Phys., X XIX, 1894, 
pp. 21-34. 


Newton’s ‘A Dictionary of Birds.’ Part III.<Auk, XII, pp. 169-170, April, 
1895. 
Notice of Part III (Moa-Sheathbill), 1894. (See supra, Nos. 431 and 437.) 


Grundtvig on the Birds of Shiocton, Wisconsin. < Auk, XII, p. 173, April, 1895. 


Notice of F. L. Grundtvig’s paper in Trans. Wisconsin Acad. Sci. Arts, and Letters, X, 
+1894, pp. 73-184. 


Bourns and Worcester on the Birds of the Philippines. <Auk, XII, pp. 73= 
174, Auk, 1895. 
Review of their paper in Occas. Papers of Minnesota Acad. Nat. Sci., I, No. 1, Dec. 1894. 


Merriam’s Laws of Temperature Control of the Distribution of Land Animals 
and Plants.<Auk, XII, pp. 172-173, April, 1895. 


Review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s paper of this title in Nat. Geogr. Mag., VI, 1894, pp. 
229-238, pll. xii—xiv. 


Minot’s Land-Birds and Game-Birds of New England. Second Edition. 
<Auk, XII, pp. 284-286, July, 1895. 


Review of the second edition of H. D. Minot’s work, edited by William Brewster (8vo, 
Boston and New York, 1895). 


Clark on the Pterylography of North American Goatsuckers and Owls. <Auk, 
XII, pp. 287-288, July, 1895. 


Review of Hubert Lyman Clark’s paper (Proc. U. SS. Nat. Mus., XVII, pp. 551-572, June. 
1895). 


471. 


472. 


473. 


474. 


475. 


475a. 


477. 


478. 


479. 


480. 


481. 


482. 


BIRDS. 155 


Sharpe and Wyatt’s Monograph of the Swallows.<Awuk, XII, pp. 373-375, 
Oct., 1895. 


Review, with critical comment, of their ‘A Monograph of the Hirundinide, or Family of 
Swallows’ (2 vols., 4to, London, 1885-1894). 


Food Habits of Woodpeckers. <Auk, XII, pp. 380-381, Oct., 1895. 


Review of F. E. L. Beal’s ‘Preliminary Report on Woodpeckers,’ and F. A. Lucas’s 


‘The Tongues of Woodpeckers,’ forming Bull. No. 7, U.S. Dept. Agric., 1895. 


Barrows and Schwarz on the Food of the Common Crow. <Auk, XII, pp. 381- 
383, Oct., 1895. 
Review of Bull. No. 6, Dept. of Agric., 1895. 


Forbush on ‘Birds as Protectors of Orchards.’ <Auk, XII, pp. 383-384, Oct., 
1895. 


Review of E. H. Forbush’s paper in Massachusetts Crop Report for July, 1895. 


Suchetet on Hybridity in Birds. <Auk, XII, p. 384, Oct., 1895. 


Review of Part V of André Suchetet’s ‘Les Oiseaux Hybrides rencontrés a l'état sauvage’ 
(Svo, pp. 473-873, Lille, 1895). (See supra, No. 407.) 


1896. 


Elliot’s ‘Monograph of the Pittide.’< Auk, XIII, pp. 60-61, Jan., 1896. 


Review of the concluding Part V, with a summary notice of the completed work (folio, 
London, 1893-1895). (See supra, Nos. 439, 450, 457.) 


A. O, U. Check-List of North American Birds, Second Edition. <Auk, XIII, 
pp. 69-70, Jan., 1896. 
Comparison with the first edition (1886). 


‘Progress in American Ornithology, 1886-95.’ <Science, N.S., III, Nos. 73 and 
75, pp. 777-779 and 842-843, May 22 and June 5, 1896. 


Relates to the Second Edition of the A. O. U. Check-List of North American Birds, in 
reply to criticisms by Dr. R. W. Shufeldt in the American Naturalist (XXX, May, 1896. pp. 
357-372), and Science (III, pp. 841-842, June 5, 1896). 


Bendire on the Cowbirds. <Auk, XIII, pp. 71-72, Jan., 1896. 


Review of Capt. Charles Bendire’s ‘The Cowbirds,’ in Report U. S. Nat. Mus. for 1893 
(1895), pp. 587-624, pll. i-iii. > 


Lucas on the Weapons and Wings of Birds.<Auk, XIII, p. 72, Jan., 1896. 


Review of Frederic A. Lucas’s paper in Report of U. S. Nat. Mus. 1893 (1895), pp. 653- 
663. 


Fisher’s Hawks and Owls from the Standpoint of the Farmer.<Auk, XIII, 
p. 73, Jan., 1896. 


Review of Dr. A. K. Fisher’s paper by this title, in Yearbook U.S. Dept. Agric. for 1894 
(1895), pp. 215-232. 


Beddard’s ‘Text-book of Zodégeography.’ <Awk, XIII, pp. 73-75, Jan., 1896. 


Review of Frank E. Beddard’s work of this title (vo, Cambridge, 1895), with critical 
comment. 


td 


156 


483. 


484. 


485. 


486. 


487. 


488. 


489. 


490. 


491. 


492. 


493. 


494. 


495. 


496. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


[The Taxonomic Value of the Tongue in Birds].<Awuk, XIII, pp. 114-115, 
April, 1896. 


Note to an article with this title (J. c., pp. 109-114) by Frederic A. Lucas. 


Gitke’s ‘Heligoland.’<Auk, XIII, pp. 137-153, April, 1896. 
An extended critical review of the work, and of Gatke’s views on bird migration, change 


of color in feathers without moult, etc. 


The ‘Birds’ of ‘The Royal Natural History.’<Auk, XIII, pp. 156-160, 252- 
253, April and July, 1896. 
Review of the bird part (Vols. III and IV) of ‘The Royal Natural History,’ edited by 
Richard Lydekker (roy. 8vo, London, 1894-95). 


Saunders and Salvin’s Catalogue of the Gavie and Tubinares.<Auk, XIII, 
pp. 160-162, April, 1896. 
Review, with comment on points of nomenclature, etc., of Vol. X XV, of the British 


Museum Catalogue of Birds. 


Salvadori’s Catalogue of the Chenomorphe, Crypturi, and Ratite.<Auk, 
XIII, pp. 162-164, April, 1896. 
Review, with technical comment, of Vol. XX VII of the British Museum Catalogue of 
Birds. 


Loomis on California Water Birds.<Auk, XIII, p. 168, April, 1896. 


Review of Leverett M. Loomis’s ‘California Water Birds, No. II,’ in Proc. California Acad. 
Sci. (2), VI, 1896, pp. 1-30. 


[Some Questions of Nomenclature].< Auk, XIII, pp. 187-190, April, 1896. 
In response, by request, to Mr. Witmer Stone’s paper of this title (/. c., pp. 183-187). 


[The Seebohm Collection of Birds].<Auk, XIII, pp. 195-196, April, 1896. 


Notice of its extent and its transfer to the British Museum. Based on an article in 
Nature (Feb. 20, 1896). 


Stone on Birds Collected in North Greenland. <Auk, XIII, p. 248, July, 1896. 
Notice of Witmer Stone’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1895, pp. 502-505. 


Schalow on a Collection of Birds from West Greenland.<Auk, XIII, pp. 
243-244, July, 1896. 


Review of a paper by Herman Schalow in Journ. f. Orn., 1895, pp. 475-481. 


Rotzell’s Birds of Narberth, Pa., and Vicinity.< Auk, XIII, p. 244, July, 1896. 
Review of Dr. W. E. Lotzell’s brochure of 8 pp. (1895). 


Rhoads’s List of Tennessee Birds. <Auk, XIII, pp. 244-245, July, 1896. 
Review of paper by S. N. Rhoads in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1895, pp. 463-501. 


Short’s Birds of Western New York. <Auk, XIII, p. 245, July, 1896. 


Review of Ernest H. Short’s second edition of his ‘Birds of Western New York’ (8vo, 
pp. 20, 1896.) (See supra, No. 444.) 


Cory’s ‘Hunting and Fishing in Florida,’ with a ‘Key to the Water Birds of 
the State.”<Auk, XIII, pp. 246-247, July, 1896. 


Review of the work (sm. quarto, Boston, 1896). 


497. 


498. 


499. 


500. 


001. 


502. 


503. 


504. 


505. 


506. 


507. 


508. 


509. 


BIRDS. ik’ 


Howe’s ‘Every Bird.’<Auk, XIII, p. 247, July, 1896. 
Review of Reginald Heber Howe, Jr’s., work of this title (sm. 8vo, Boston, 1896). 


Winchell’s ‘Evolution of Bird Song.’< Auk, XIII, pp. 249-250, July, 1896. 
Review of Charles A. Winchell’s work of this title (89vo, London and New York). 


Harvey-Brown and Buckley’s ‘A Vertebrate Fauna of the Moray Basin.’ < 
Auk, XIII, pp. 251-252, July, 1896. 
Review of the work (sm. 4to, Edinburgh, 1895). 


The Origin and Relations of the Floras and Faunas of the Antarctic and adja- 
cent Regions. Vertebrata of the Land; Birds and Mammals. <Science (2), 
III, No. 61, pp. 317-319, Feb. 28, 1896. 


Birds offer no satisfactory evidence of a former ‘‘ Antarctic Continent.” 


Alleged Changes of Color in the Feathers of Birds without Molting. < Bull. 
Amer Mus. Nat. Hist., VIII, pp. 13-44, March 18, 1896. 


“Tt is a summary and criticism of the work of some of the more important writers upon 
the subject of color changes in feathers without moult, and it deals unsparingly with those 
who have asserted as possible the complete rejuvenation of an abraded feather....’— J. 
Dwight, Jr., in Auk, XIII, pp. 166-167, April, 1896. 

Schwann’s Handbook of British Birds.< Auk, XIII, pp. 328-329, Oct., 1896. 

Review of H. Kirke Schwann’s ‘Concise Handbook of British Birds’ (16mo, London, 
1896). 


Ridgway and Lucas on a New Family [Procniatide] of Birds.< Auk, XIII, 
pp. 334-335, Oct., 1896. 
Review of two papers on this subject by R. Ridgway and F. A. Lucas, in Proc. U. S. Nat. 
Mus., XVIII, pp. 450, and 505-507. 


Montgomery on Migration as a Check upon Geographic Variation. <Auk, 
XIII, p. 335, Oct., 1896. 
Review of a paper by Thomas H. Montgomery, Jr., in Amer. Nat., 1896, pp. 458-464. 
Contributions to Economic Ornithology. < Auk, XIII, pp. 335-338, Oct., 1896. 
Notice of papers by 8S. D. Judd, F. E. L. Beal, E. H. Forbush, and Miss F. A. Merriam. 


1897. 


Sharpe’s Catalogue of the Limicole.<Auk, XIV, pp. 102-104, Jan., 1897. 
Review of Vol. X XIV of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds, 1896. 


Bendire’s ‘Life Histories of North American Birds.’<Awuk, XIV, pp. 104-106, 
Jan., 1897. 


Review of Part II of Capt. Charles E. Bendire’s important work. (See supra, No. 405). 


Miss Merriam’s ‘ A-Birding on a Bronco.’ <Auk, XIV, pp. 107-108, Jan., 1897. 
Review of Miss Florence A. Merriam’s work of this title (16mo, Boston and New York, 
1896). 


‘Papers Presented to the World’s Congress of Ornithology.’<Auk, XIV, p. 
108, Jan., 1897. 


Review of a volume thus entitled, and edited by Mrs. E. Irene Rood (8vo, Chicago, 1896). * 


158 


510. 


513. 


516. 


517. 


518. 


519. 


520. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


The Revised New Nuttall.< Auk, XIV, p. 109, Jan., 1897. 


Review of Montague Chamberlain’s second and revised ed. of Nuttall’s Ornithology (2 
vols., 8vo, Boston, 1896). (Cf. supra, No. 381.) 


Wintle’s ‘Birds of Montreal.’ < Auk, XIV, p. 112, Jan., 1897. 
Review of Ernest D. Wintle’s work of this title (8vo, Montreal, 1896) . 


Oberholser’s Birds of Wayne County, Ohio.< Auk, XIV, pp. 112-1138, Jan., 
1897. 


Review of H. C. Oberholser’s ‘A Preliminary List of the Birds of Wayne County, Ohio’ 
(Bull. Ohio Agric. Exper. Station, tech. ser., I, No. 4, July, 1896, pp. 243-354). 


Ridgway’s ‘Manual of North American Birds.’ < Auk, XIV, pp. 232-233, April, 
1897. 
Review of the 2d ed. (roy. 8vo, Philadelphia, 1896). 


Goode’s ‘The Published Writings of Philip Lutley Sclater.’<Awuk, XIV, pp. 
233-234, April, 1897. 
Review of Bull. No. 49, U.S. Nat. Mus., 1896. 


Bates’s ‘The Game Birds of North America.’ < Auk, XIV, p. 244, April, 1897. 
Review of the work (16mo, Boston, 1896). 


Butler on ‘A Century of Change in the Aspects of Nature in Indiana.’ < Auk, 
XIV, p. 245, April, 1897. 


Notice of A. W. Butler’s paper of this title in Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci., No. V, 1895, pp. 
31-42. 


Elliot’s Catalogue of a Collection of Birds from Somali-Land.<Awk, XIV, 
p. 245, April, 1897. 
Notice of D. G. Elliot’s paper of this title in Field Mus. Publ., Orn. Ser., I, No. 2, 1897, 
pp. 29-67). 


Anderson’s Birds of Winnebago and Hancock Counties, lowa.<Auk, XIV, 
p. 246, April, 1897. 
Notice of Rudolph M. Anderson’s privately printed brochure, 16mo, pp. ii + 19, Forest 
City, Iowa, 1897. 
Ricker’s Notes on the Birds of Hull, Mass.<Awuk, XIV, p. 246, April, 1897. 
Brief notice of Everett W. Ricker’s privately printed paper of this title (16mo, Newton- 
ville, Mass., 1896). 
Howe’s Birds of Brookline, Mass.<Auwk, XIV, p. 246, April, 1897. 
Notice of paper of this title by Reginald Heber Howe, Jr. (privately printed, folio, 2 pp., 
Jan., 1897). 


Tegetmeier’s ‘Pheasants.’< Auk, XIV, pp. 426-427, April, 1897. 
Review of the third edition of W. B. Tegetmeier’s work of this title (Svo, London, 1897). 


Cory’s List of the Birds of Eastern North America. <Auk, XIV, p. 248, April, 


1897. 
Review of C. B. Cory’s work of this title (8vo, Boston, 1896). 


Schalow’s the Published Writings of Anton Reichenow. <Auk, XIV, p. 248, 
April, 1897. 
Notice of the work (8vo, pp. 29, 1896). 


5200. 


524. 


525. 


526. 


527. 


528. 


529. 


530. 


531. 


d02. 


530. 


534. 


535. 


536. 


BIRDS. 159 


The Fate of some Carrier Pigeons. < Forest and Stream, XLVIII, p. 383, 1897. 


The Proper Generic Name of the Loons. <Auwk, XIV, p. 312, July, 1897. 


Gavia Forster should replace Urinator Cuvier. 


Ridgway’s Birds of the Galapagos Archipelago.<Auk, XIV, pp. 329-330, 
July, 1897. 
Review of R. Ridgway’s monographic paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XIX, pp. 459-670. 


Cooke’s ‘Birds of Colorado.’ < Auk, XIV, pp. 331-332, July, 1897. 


Review of W. W. Cooke’s paper of this title in Bull. No. 37, Colorado State Agric. College, 
pp. 143, March 17, 1897. 


Miller on Construction of Scientific Names.<Auk, XIV, pp. 332-333, July, 
1897. 


Review of Prof. Walter Miller’s paper on this subject (Proc. California Acad. Sct., 3d ser., 
I, No. 3, pp. 115-148). 


The New York Zodlogical Society.< Auk, XIV, p. 344, July, 1897. 


Announcement of its organization. 


Cory’s Shore Birds of North America. < Auk, XIV, pp. 418-419, Oct., 1897. 
Notice of C. B. Cory’s work of this title (sm. 4to, Boston, 1897). 


Hartert on the Podargide, Caprimulgide and Macropterygide.<Auk, XIV, 
pp. 419-420, Oct., 1897. 


Review of Ernest Hartert’s monographs of these families (in ‘Das Tierreich,’ Lief. 1). 


Papers on Economic Ornithology.<Awk, XIV, pp. 420-422, Oct., 1897. 


Review of S. D. Judd’s ‘Methods in Economic Ornithology with Special reference to the 
Catbird’; F. E. L. Beal’s ‘The Blue Jay and its Food,’ and his ‘Some Common Birds in their 
Relation to Agriculture’; and Dr. T. S. Palmer’s ‘Extermination of Noxious Animals by 
Bounties.’ 


Whitlock’s Review of Herr Gitke’s Views on the Migration of Birds. <Auk, 
XIV, pp. 422-424, Oct., 1897. 


Review of F. B. Whitlock’s work on Herr Giatke’s ‘ Views,’ etc. (Svo, London, 1897), with 
excerps from his criticisms of Herr Gatke’s theories and assumptions. 


Suchetet on Hybrids among Wild Birds. <Auk, XIV, pp. 424-425, Oct., 1897. 


Review of the completed work ‘Des Hybrides 4 l'état sauvage,’ by André Suchetet. 
(Large 8vo, Paris, 1897; see supra, Nos. 407, 475). 


Birds and Millinery. <New York Times, Nov. 21, 1897. 
Reply to an editorial on this subject in the New York Times, of Nov. 19, 1897. 


An Ornithologist’s Plea. < New York Times, Nov. 25, 1897. 


Reply to criticism by ‘A. B. C.’ on the work of the Audubon Societies, in the New York 
Times of Nov. 22, 1897. 


Heron Farming for Aigrettes.< New York Times, Nov. 29, 1897. 


Exposure of the report of an alleged heron farm in Tunis, cited in the New York Times 
of Nov. 23 and 26, 1897. 


160 


537. 


538. 


539. 


540. 


O41. 


042. 


545. 


544. 


045. 


046. 


547. 


548. 


549, 


000. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1898. 


Dixon’s Migration of Birds. < Auk, XV, pp. 67-70, Jan., 1898. 


Review of Charles Dixon’s ‘The Migration of Birds,’ etc., ‘‘amended”’ edition (8vo, Lon- 
don, 1897). Critical notice of his theories of the origin and causes of migration. (Cf. supra, 
No. 411.) 


Marsh on ‘The Affinities of Hesperornis.’ << Auk, XV, p. 70, Jan., 1898. 


Critical notice of O. C. Marsh’s paper in Amer. Journ. Sci., III, pp. 347-348, April, 1897. - 


Stone on the Genus Sturnella.< Auk, XV, p. 70, Jan., 1898. 
Notice of Witmer Stone’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1897, pp. 146-152. 


The Proper Name of the Western Horned Owl. <Auk, XV, p. 71, Jan., 1898. 
Review of Witmer Stone’s paper on this subject in Amer. Nat., March, 1897, p. 236. 


Baskett’s ‘Story of the Birds.’ < Auk, XV, pp. 71-72, Jan., 1898. 
Review of James Newton Baskett’s work of this title (12mo, New York, 1897). 


Grinnell on the Birds of Santa Barbara, San Nicolas and San Clemente Islands, 
California. <Auk, XV, p. 73, Jan., 1898. 
Notice of paper by J. Grinnell in Publ. No. I, Pasadena Acad. Sci., pp. 26, Aug., 1897. 


[New York Zodlogical Society.]< Auk, XV, pp. 79-80, Jan., 1898. 


Its plans and progress. 


‘Audubon and His Journals.’< Auk, XV, pp. 198-205, April, 1898. 
Review of Miss Maria R. Audubon’s work of this title (2 vols., 8vo, New York, 1897). 


Miss Merriam’s ‘Birds of Village and Field.’ < Auk, XV, p. 206, April, 1898. 


Review of Miss Florence A. Merriam’s work of this title (12mo, Boston and New York, 
1898). 


‘Hair and Feathers.’< Auk, XV, p. 207, April, 1898. 


Review of paper by J. S. Kingsley of this title in Amer. Nat., XX XI, pp. 767-777, figs. 
1-14, Sept., 1897. 


Bauer on the Birds of the Galapagos Archipelago.< Auk, XV, pp. 207-208, 
April, 1898. : 
Review of G. Bauer’s paper on Galapagos birds in Amer. Nat., XX XI, 1897, pp. 777-784. 


Two New Popular Bird Books. <Auk, XV, pp. 275-278, July, 1898. 


Review of W. E. D. Scott’s ‘ Bird Studies’ (4to, 1898), and of A. C. Apgar’s ‘Birds of the 
United States, east of the Rocky Mountains’ (sm. 8vo, New York, 1898). 


Cory’s Ducks, Geese and Swans. <Auk, XV, pp. 278-279, July, 1898. 


Review of C. B. Cory’s ‘How to know the Ducks, Geese and Swans of North America’ 
(sm. 4to, Boston, 1897). 


Worcester and Bourn’s Contributions to Philippine Ornithology.<Auk, XV, 
p. 284, July, 1898. 


Review of their paper on Philippine birds in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XX, No. 1143, pp. 
549-625, 1898. 


+a 
ta 


551. 


552. 


550. 


504. 


559. 


556. 


557. 


508. 


559. 


560. 


561. 


562. 


563. 


564. 


BIRDS. 161 


Butler’s Birds of Indiana.<Auk, XV, pp. 335-336, Oct., 1898. 
Review of A. W. Butler’s descriptive catalogue, etc., in Rep. State Geologist of Indiana 
for 1897, pp. 515-1187. 
Blanford’s ‘Birds of British India.’<Auk, XV, p. 336, Oct., 1898. 
Review of Vol. IV of ‘The Fauna of British India.’ 


Gurney’s ‘The Economy of the Cuckoo.’ <Auk, XV, pp. 337-338, Oct., 1898. 


Review of a paper by J. H. Gurney, published in Norfolk and Norwich Nat. Soc., V1, pp. 
365-384. 


Eastman on Struthious Birds. << Auk, XV, pp. 338-339, Oct., 1898. 
Review of paper by C. R. Eastman, in Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., XX XII. No. 7, pp. 127- 
144, 1898. 
Bangs on Birds from Colombia. <Auk, XV, p. 339, Oct., 1898. 
Notice of two papers by Outram Bangs, in Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XV, 1898, pp. 
131-144, 157-160. 
Nelson on New Birds from Mexico. <Awk, XV, pp. 339-340, Oct., 1898. 
Notice of two papers by E. W. Nelson, in Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XV, 1898, pp. 5-11, 
57-68. ’ 
1899. 


Torrey’s ‘A World of Green Hills.’ <Auwk, XV, pp. 86-87, Jan., 1899. 
Review of Bradford Torrey’s work of this title (16mo, Boston and New York, 1898). 


Mrs. Maynard’s Birds of Washington. <Auwk, XVI, pp. 87-88, Jan., 1899. 


Review of Mrs. L. W. Maynard’s ‘Birds of Washington and Vicinity,’ etc. (8vo, Wash- 
ington, 1898). 


Blanchan’s ‘Birds that Hunt and are Hunted.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 88-89, Jan., 
1899. 
Review of Neltjie Blanchan’s work of this title (8vo, New York, 1898). 


Huntington’s ‘In Brush, Sedge, and Stubble.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 89, 372-373, 
Jan. and July, 1899. 


Notice of Parts I and II of Dwight W. Huntington’s work “thus entitled (folio, Cincinnati, 
1898). 


Oberholser on the Wrens of the Genus Thryomanes.<Auk, XVI, pp. 89-90, 
Jan., 1899. 
Notice of H. C. Oberholser’s paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., X XI, No. 1153, pp. 421-450, 


Nov., 1898. 
Bangs on Birds from Colombia. <Auk, XVI, pp. 90-91, Jan., 1899. 
Notice of his third paper on Colombian birds (Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XII, 1898, pp. 
171-192. 
Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science. <Auk, XVI, p. 91, Jan., 1899. 


Notice of the ornithological papers in the volume for the year 1897. 


The Osprey. < Auk, XVI, pp. 95-213, Jan. and April, 1899. 


The transfer of this journal from New York to Washington, changes in its management 
and editorial control, and comment (Il. c., p. 213) on Dr. Gill’s views on the classification of 
birds. 


566. 


567. 


568. 


569. 


570. 


O71. 


572. 


573. 


OVA. 


575. 


578. 


579. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


[New York Zodlogical Park.]<Auk, XVI, p. 96, Jan., 1899. 


Further account of progress. 


Volume X XVI of the British Museum Catalogue of Birds.<Auk, XVI, pp. 
198-2038, April, 1899. 
Critical review of the volume (by R. Bowdler Sharpe and W. R. Ogilvie-Grant), and a 


general survey of the whole series (27 volumes) of the ‘Catalogue’ (1874-1898). 
[Chuck-will’s-widow in Kansas.]< Auk, XVI, p. 187, footnote, April, 1899. 
Second authentic record for Kansas. (See further, Auk, XVII, p. 175.) 


Evans’s ‘Birds.’<Auk, XVI, p. 203, April, 1899. 
Notice of the Bird volume (Vol. IX) by A. H. Evans, of the Cambridge Natural History 
Series. 


‘Birds.’ <Science, N. 8., IX, pp. 647-648, May 5, 1899. 
Review of the volume ‘ Birds,’ by A. H. Evans, Cambridge Natural History Series, Vol. IX. 


Von Ihering’s Birds of Sao Paulo, Brazil.< Auk, XVI, pp. 203-204, April, 1899. 
Review of Dr. Von Ihering’s ‘ As Aves do Estado de S. Paulo,’ in Revista do Museu Paulista, 
III, 1899, pp. 113-476. 
Dearborn’s Birds of Belknap and Merrimac Counties, New Hampshire. < Auk, 
XVI, p. 204, April, 1899. 
Notice of Ned Dearborn’s ‘Preliminary List,’ etc. (doctorial thesis, 8vo, Durham, New 
Hampshire College, 1898). 
Nash’s ‘The Birds of Ontario in Relation to Agriculture.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 
204-205, April, 1899. 
Notice of Charles W. Nash’s work of this title (8vo, Toronto, 1898). 


Stejneger on the Birds of the Kurile Islands. < Auk, XVI, p. 205, April, 1899. 
Notice of Dr. L. Stejneger’s paper of this title (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., X XI, pp. 269-296). 


Clark on ‘The Feather Tracts of North American Grouse and Quail.’ < Auk, 
XVI, pp. 205-206, April, 1899. 
Paper by Hubert Lyman Clark, in Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., X XJ, pp. 641-654, pll. xlvii—xlix. 
[‘Bird-Lore.’]|< Auk, XVI, pp. 212-213, April, 1899. 


Notice of the inception, character and scope of this new ornithological journal. 


Elhot’s Wild Fowl of North America. <Auk, XVI, pp. 288-289, July, 1899. 
Review of D. G. Elliot’s ‘Wild Fowl of the United States and British Possessions,’ etc. 
(Svo, New York, F. P. Harper, 1898). 
Thompson’s ‘Wild Animals I have known.’<Auwuk, XVI, pp. 289-290, July, 


1899. 
Review of his book of this title (vo, New York, 1899). 


Stone on the Types of Birds in the Collection of the Academy of Natural 
Sciences of Philadelphia.< Auk, XVI, p. 290, July, 1899. 
Summary of Witmer Stone’s paper in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1899, pp. 5-62. 


New North American Birds.< Auk, XVI, p. 291, July, 1899. 
Notice of three papers by O. Bangs, one by W. Brewster, and one by W. H. Osgood. 


580. 


581. 


082. 


583. 


584. 


585. 


586. 


587. 


588. 


589. 


590. 


O91. 


BIRDS. 163 


Economic Relations of Birds to Agriculture. < Auk, XVI, pp. 294-295, July, 
1899. 
Notice of papers by F. E. L. Beal, S. D. Judd, and T, S. Palmer. 


Genera and Subgenera of the A. O. U. Check-List.< Auk, XVI, p. 297, July, 
1899. 


General comment with reference to a paper on this subject by E. Coues in The Osprey , 
III, 1899, p. 144. 


[A Sophism anent Bird Destruction.]<Auk, XVI, p. 304, July, 18997 


Republication of Descriptions of New Species and Subspecies of North Ameri- 
can Birds. <Auk, XVI, pp. 338-350, July, 1899. 


Includes those given in the ‘Ninth Supplement’ to the A. O. U. Check-List, and also 
those published subsequently, down to October, 1899. 


Montgomery on the Food of Owls.<Auk, XVI, pp. 363-364, Oct., 1899. 


Review and summary of Thomas H. Montgomery, Jr’s., paper on this subject in Amer. 
Nat., XX XIII, July, 1899, pp. 563-572. 


D. E. Lantz’s ‘Review of Kansas Ornithology.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 364-365, 
Oct., 1899. 


Review of his paper in Trans. Kansas Acad. Sct., 1896-97, pp. 224-276 (July, 1899). 


The Goss Collection of Mexican and Central American Birds.<Auk, XVI, 
pp. 365-866, Oct., 1899. 


' Review of D. E. Lantz’s paper on Col. N.S. Goss’s Collection (Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 
1896-97. pp. 218-224, July, 1899). 


C. B. Cory’s ‘The Birds of Eastern North America. Water Birds, Part I.’ 
<Auk, XVI, pp. 366-867, Oct., 1899. 
~ Review of the work (sm. 4to, Field Museum, Chicago, 1899). 


Edward Knobel’s ‘Field Key to the Land Birds.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 367-368, 
Oct., 1899. 


Review of the work (12mo, Boston, 1899). 


Mrs. Olive Thorne Miller’s ‘The First Book of Birds.’<Auk, XVI, pp. 368- 
369, Oct., 1899. 


Review of the work (12mo, Boston, 1899). 


Oberholser on Untenable Names in Ornithology.<Auk, XVI, p. 370, Oct., 
1899. 


Notice of H. C. Oberholser’s paper of this title (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1899, 
pp. 201-216). 


Gurney and Gill on the Age to which Birds Live.<Auk, XVI, pp. 370-372, 
Oct., 1899. 


Review of H. Gurney’s (Ibis, Jan., 1899, pp. 19-42) and Theodore Gill’s (Osprey, IIT, 
1899, pp. 157-160) papers on this subject. 


164 


592. 


593. 


594. 


595. 
596. 


597. 


598. 


599. 


600. 


601. 


602. 


603. 


604. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1900. 


The Little Black Rail.< Auk, XVII, pp. 1-8, pl. i, Jan., 1900. 


General history of Porzana jamaicensis. 


Merriam’s Biological Survey of Mount Shasta.< Auk, XVII, pp. 73-74, Jan., 
1900. 


Review of ‘Results of a Biological Survey of Mount Shasta, California,’ by C. Hart 
Merriam (NV. Amer. Fauna, No. 16, Oct. 18, 1899). 


Palmer’s ‘The Avifauna of Pribilof Islands.’<Auk, XVII, pp. 74-76, Jan., 
1900. 


Review of Wm. Palmer’s paper of this title in Jordan’s ‘The Fur Seal Islands of the North 
Pacific’ (Part III, 1899, pp. 355-431, pll. xxxviii—xli). 


Howe and Sturtevant’s ‘Birds of Rhode Island.’<Auk, XVII, pp. 76-77, 
Jan., 1900. 
Review of the work (8vo, Newport, 1899). 


Cory’s ‘The Birds of Eastern North America. Part II, Land Birds.’ <Auk, 
XVII, p. 78, Jan., 1900. 
Review of C. B. Cory’s work of this title (sm. 4to, Field Museum, Chicago, 1899). 


‘Avium Generum Alphabeticus.’ <Auk, XVII, pp. 78-79, Jan., 1900. 
Review of the work, published by the British Ornithologists’ Club, (Bulletin, Vol. IX, 
pp. 1-31, 1899). 
Sharpe’s ‘Hand-List of the Genera and Species of Birds.’<Auk, XVII, pp. ~ 
79-81, Jan., 1900. 
Review of Vol. I (8vo, British Museum, 1899). 


Dubois’s ‘Synopsis Avium.’<Auk, XVII, p. 81, Jan., 1900. 
Notice of fasc. i, of the work (4to, Bruxelles, 1899). 


Salvadori and Festa on Birds of Ecuador.< Auk, XVII, pp. 81-82, Jan., 1900. 


Review of their ‘ Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nell’ Ecuador’ (in Boll. Mus. Zool. ed Anat. 
comp. d. R. Univ. di Torino, Vol. XV, pp. 1-31, 1899). 


Kellogg’s List of Biting Lice (Mallophaga) taken from North American Birds 
and Mammals.< Auk, XVII, pp. 82-84, Jan., 1900. 
Review of Vernon L. Kellogg’s paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXII, No. 1183, 1889, 
pp. 39-100. 


Lange’s ‘Our Native Birds, How to Protect them and Attract them to our 
Homes.’ <Auk, XVII, pp. 85-86, Jan., 1900. 
Review of D. Lange’s work of this title (12mo, New York and London, 1899). 


H. A. Macpherson’s ‘History of Fowling.’< Auk, XVII, pp. 85-86, Jan., 1900. 
Review of the work (large 8vo, Edinburgh, 1899). 


Bumpus on ‘The Elimination of the Unfit.’< Auk, XVII, p. 87, Jan., 1900. 
Review of Hermon C. Bumpus’s paper entitled ‘‘The Elimination of the Unfit as illus- 
trated by the Introduced Sparrow Passer domesticus”’ (in Biol. Lectures of the Marine Biol. 
Lab., Wood’s Holl, Mass., Sess. of 1897-1898, pp. 209-226. 


605. 


606. 


607. 


608. 


609. 


610. 


611. 


612. 


613. 


614. 


615. 


615a. 


616. 


617. 


BIRDS. 165° 


Whitman on ‘Animal Behavior.’<Auk, XVII, pp. 87-88, Jan., 1900. 


Review of C. O. Whitman’s paper in Biol. Lect. of the Marine Biol. Lab., Wood’s Holl, 
Mass., 1898 (1899), pp. 285-338. 


[Bird Destruction for Millinery Purposes.] <Awk, XVII, pp. 94-96, Jan., 1900. 


Extended comment on the subject. 


Keeler’s ‘Bird Notes Afield.’< Auk, XVII, pp. 180-181, April, 1900. 


Review of Charles A. Keeler’s work of this title (8vo, San Francisco, 1899). 


Russell on Birds of the Northwest Territory. < Auk, XVII, pp. 181-182, April, 
1900. 


Review of Frank Russell’s ‘Explorations in the Far North’ (8vo, University of Iowa, 
1899. Birds, pp. 253-270). 


Loomis on California Water Birds.< Auk, XVII, pp. 182-183, April, 1900. 


Review of Part IV of L. M. Loomis’s series of papers ynder this general title (Proc. Cali- 
fornia Acad. Sci., 3d Ser., Il, pp. 277-322, Feb. 12, 1900). 


Witmer Stone on ‘The Summer Molting Plumage of Certain Ducks.’ < Auk, 
XVII, pp. 188-184, April, 1900. 
Review of his paper (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1899, pp. 467-472) . 


Stark’s Birds of South Africa.< Auk, XVII, pp. 189-190, April, 1900. 
Review of Vol. I of Arthur C. Stark’s ‘ Birds of South Africa’ (Svo, London, 1900). 


Rothschild and Hartert’s ‘Review of the Ornithology of the Galapagos Is- 
lands.’< Auk, XVII, pp. 300-3038, July, 1900. 


Review of their paper on this subject (Vovitates Zoologice, VI, 1899, pp. 85-205). 


Salvadori and Festa on Birds of Ecuador. <Auk, XVII, p. 308, July, 1900. 
Review of Parts II and III of their paper on the birds of Ecuador. (See supra, No. 600.) 


Oberholser on Birds from Central Asia, Madagascar, and Santa Barbara Is- 
lands, Cal.< Auk, XVII, pp. 304-305, July, 1900. 


Review of three papers by H. C. Oberholser (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., X XII, Nos. 1195- 
1197, pp. 205-234). 


Dugmore’s ‘Bird Homes.’ < Auk, XVII, pp. 306-307, July, 1909. 
Review of A. R. Dugmore’s work thus entitled (Svo, New York, 1900). 


‘Bird Homes.’<New York Evening Post, June 26, 1900. 
Review of A. R. Dugmore’s work of this title. (See supra, No. 615.) 


Henry J. Pearson’s ‘Beyond Petsora Eastward.’<Auwk, XVII, pp. 307-308, 
July, 1900. 
Review of the work (royal 8vo, London, 1899). 


Collett and Nansen’s Birds of the Norwegian North Polar Expedition. eed 
XVII, pp. 308-310, July, 1900. 


Review of section IV, ‘An account of the Birds,’ of the Norwegian North Polar Expedi- 
tion of 1893-1896 (4to, Christiania, London, etc., 1899). 


626. 


627. 


628. 


629. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Palmer on Legislation for the Protection of Birds. <Auk, XVII, pp. 314-315, 
July, 1900. 


Résumé of Dr. T. S. Palmer’s report on the subject, forming Bull. No. 12 of the Division 
of the Biological Survey. 


[The Outlook for Bird Protection in North America.] << Auk, XVII, pp. 323-324, 
July, 1900. 


‘ Aptosochromatism.’< Auk, XVII, pp. 327-336, Oct., 1900. 


Apropos of papers by F. J. Bertwell, Dr. A. P. Chadbourne, and J. Lewis Bonhote on the 
alleged change of color in feathers without moult. 


North American Birds Collected at Santa Marta, Colombia.<Awk, XVII, 
pp. 363-367, Oct., 1900. 


43 species, 16 of them here recorded for the first time from Colombia. 


List of Birds collected in the District of Santa Marta, Colombia, by Mr. 
Herbert H. Smith. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, pp. 117-183, Aug. 25, 
1900. 


An annotated list of 388 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Odontophorus atrifrons, p. 127; (2) 
Myiobis assimilis. p. 144; (3) Ochtheca jesupi, p. 151; (4) Ochtheca olivacea, p. 152; (5) 
Attila parvirostris, p. 153; (6) Attila rufipectus, p. 1538; (7) Grallaria bangsi, p. 159; (8) 
Hylophilus brunneus, p. 171. 

Beyer’s ‘The Avifauna of Louisiana.’<Auk, XVII, pp. 392-393, Oct., 1900. 

Review of George E. Beyer’s annotated list of the Birds of Louisiana (Proc. Lowisiana 
Soc. Naturalists, 1897-1899 [1900]. Birds, pp. 1-45 of reprint). 

Burns’s ‘A Monograph of the Flicker.’ < Auk, XVII, pp. 393-394, Oct., 1900. 

Review of Frank L. Burns’s paper in Wilson Bulletin, April, 1900, pp. 1-82. 


John Macoun’s ‘Catalogue of Canadian Birds.’<Auk, XVII, pp. 394-395, 
Oct., 1900. 


Review of Part I of this work (8vo, Ottawa: 1900). 


Proceedings of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Club. < Auk, XVII, p. 395, 
Oct., 1900. 


Synopsis of No. III, for the years 1898 and 1899 (1900). 


Economic Ornithology.<Auk, XVII, pp. 396-399, Oct., 1900. 


Review of various circulars and reports by Dr. T. S. Palmer, issued by the U.S. Depart- 
ment of Agriculture. 


The Birds of Celebes and Neighboring Islands. <Science, N.8., XII, pp. 223- 
225, Aug. 10, 1900. 


Review of A. B. Meyer and L. W. Wigglesworth’s work of this title (2 vols., 4to, Berlin, 
1898). 


Meyer and Wigglesworth’s ‘ Birds of Celebes.’ <<Auk, XVII, 1900, pp. 399-401. 
(See supra, No. 627.) 
1901. 


Joseph Grinnell’s ‘Birds of the Kotzebue Sound Region.’<Auk, XVIII, pp. 
119-120, Jan., 1901. 


Review of the paper (Pacific Coast Avifauna, No. 1, pp. 1-80, and map). 


630. 


631. 
632. 


633. 
634. 


635. 


636. 


637. 


638. 
639. 
640. 
641. 


642. 


643. 


BIRDS. 167 


Sharpe’s ‘Hand-List of the Genera and Species of Birds.< Auk, XVIII, pp. 
120-121, Jan., 1901. 
Review of Vol. II. (See supra, No. 598.) 


Dubois’s ‘Synopsis Avium.’ <Auk, XVIII, pp. 121-122, Jan., 1901. 
Review of fascicles II-IV. (See supra, No. 599.) 


G. E. Shelley’s ‘Birds of Africa.’< Auk, XVIII, p. 122, Jan., 1901. 
Review of Vols. I and IT (4to, London, 1896 and 1900). 


Republication of Descriptions of New Species and Subspecies of North Ameri- 
can Birds. No. 2.<Auk, XVIII, pp. 172-179, April, 1901. 
Includes the forms described in 1900. (See supra, No. 583.) 


Richard M. Barrington’s ‘The Migration of Birds at Irish Light Stations.’ < 
Auk, XVIII, pp. 205-206, April, 1901. 
Review of the work (8vo, London and Dublin, 1900). 


Gatke’s ‘Heligoland.’ Second German Edition.<Auk, XVIII, pp. 206-207, 
April, 1901. 


Brief notice. 


Collett on the Skull and Auricular Openings in North European Owls. <Auk, 
XVIII, p. 207, April, 1901. 
Brief notice of Dr. R. W. Shufeldt’s English translation in Journal of Morphology, XVII, 
1900, pp. 119-176, pll. xv—xx. 
Merriam and Preble on the Summer Birds of Western Maryland.<Auk, 
XVIII, p. 208, April, 1901. 


Review of their paper in the Alleghany County Report of Maryland Geol. Surv., 1900, 
pp. 291-307, Nov. 1900. 


Loomis on California Water Birds. < Auk, XVIII, pp. 208-209, April, 1901. 
Review of No. V, of this series of papers (Proc. California Acad. Sci., 3d ser., II, pp. 349- 
363, Nov. 24, 1900). 


Eaton’s ‘ Birds of Western New York.’ < Auk, XVIII, pp. 212-213, April, 1901. 
Review of Elon Howard Eaton’s paper in Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci., 1V, 1901, pp. 1-64. 


The Question of the Generic Name Gavia.< Auk, XVIII, pp. 270-271, April, 
1901. 


S. G. Gmelin’s use of the name Gavia is merely a citation from Brisson, without nomen- 
clatural significance, contrary to the opinion of Dr. Anton Reichenow. 


Norton on Birds from Labrador. < Auk, XVIII, p. 277, April, 1901. 


Review of Arthur H. Norton’s paper in Proc. Portland Soc. Nat. Hist., If, 1901, pp. 139- 
158, pl. ii. 


Howe and Allen’s ‘Birds of Massachusetts.’< Auk, XVIII, p. 278, July, 1901. 
Review of R. H. Howe and G. M. Allen’s work (8vo, Cambridge, Mass., 1901). 


R. M. Strong’s ‘Quantitative Study of Variation in the Smaller North Ameri- 
ean Shrikes.’< Auk, XVIII, pp. 283-284, July, 1901. 
Review of his paper of this title in Amer. Nat., XX XV, April, 1901, pp. 271-298. 


168 


644. 


645. 


646. 


647. 


648. 


649. 


650. 


651. 


652. 


653. 


654. 


655. 


656. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Stone ‘On Moult and Alleged Color-change in Birds.’<Auk, XVIII, p. 284, 
July, 1901. 
Review of Witmer Stone’s paper in The Ibis, April, 1901, pp. 177-183. 


Selous’s ‘Bird Watching.’ < Auk, XVIII, pp. 408-409, Oct., 1901. 


Review of Edmund Selous’s work (8vo, London, 1901). 


The Woodpeckers. By Fannie Hardy Eckstorm. <The Nation, LX XII, No. 
1867, April 11, 1901. Also Auk, XVIII, p. 210, April, 1901. 


Review of the work (square 12mo, Boston, 1901). 


1902. 


‘Der Gesang der Vogel, seine anatomischen und biologischen Grundlagen.’ < 
Science, N. 8., XV, pp. 98-99, Jan., 1902. 
Review of Dr. Valentin Hacker’s work of this title (gr. 8vo, Jena, 1900). 


The Birds of North and Middle America. <Science, N. 8., XV, pp. 225-226, 


Feb. 7, 1902. 
Review of Part I of R. Ridgway’s work of this title (Bulletin 50, U.S. National Museum). 


Ridgway’s ‘Birds of North and Middle America.’<Awk, XIX, pp. 97-102, 
Jan., 1902. 
Review of Part I. (See supra, No. 648.) 


Scott on the Song of Baltimore Orioles in Captivity. < Auk, XIX, pp. 102-104, 
Jan., 1902. 
Review of ‘Data on Bird Songs,’ by W. E. D. Scott (Science, N. S., XIV, pp. 522-526, 
Oct. 4, 1901). 


Sharpe’s ‘Hand-List of the Genera and Species of Birds.’ < Auk, XIX, pp. 105- 
106, Jan., 1902. 
Review of Vol. III. (See supra, Nos. 598 and 630.) 


Stark’s ‘Birds of South Africa.’ <Auk, XIX, pp. 106-107, Jan., 1902. 
Review of Vol. II. (See supra, No. 611.) 


Osgood’s Contributions to the Natural History of the Queen Charlotte Islands 
and the Cook Inlet Region of Alaska.< Auk, XIX, pp. 108-110, Jan., 1902. 
Review of W. H. Osgood’s paper (Vorth Amer. Fauna, No. 21, Sept. 1901). 


Verrill’s ‘The Story of the Cahow.’<Auk, XIX, pp. 110-111, Jan., 1902. 
Review of A. E. Verrill’s paper in Pop. Sci. Monthly, LX, Nov., 1901, pp. 22-30. 


Bonhote’s ‘On the Evolution of Pattern in Feathers.’< Auk, XIX, pp. 112- 


114, Jan., 1902. 
Review of J. L. Bonhote’s speculative essay (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1901, pp. 316-826). 


Proceedings of the Nebraska Ornithologists’ Union.< Auk, XIX, p. 215, 
April, 1902. 


Review of the Proceedings of the second annual meeting, held in Omaha, Jan. 12, 1901. 


658. 


659. 


660. 


661. 


662. 


663. 


664. 


665. 


666. 


667. 


668. 


669. 


BIRDS. 169: 


The American and European Herring Gulls.< Auk, XIX, pp. 2838-284, April,. 
1902. 


Not separable even as subspecies. 


The name of the Zenaida Dove. <Auk, XIX, pp. 286-287, April, 1902. 


The Columba meridionalis Latham, 1801, is not the Zenaida zenaida Bonaparte, as claimed’ 
by Forbes and Robinson (Bull. Liverpool Mus., I, 1898, p. 36). 


Campbell’s Nests and Eggs of Australian Birds.< Auk, XIX, pp. 301-302, 
July, 1902. 


Review of Archibald James Campbell’s work of this title (2 vols., Royal 8vo, Melbourn, 
1900). 


Woodcock’s Birds of Oregon. << Auk, XIX, pp. 302-3038, July, 1902. 


Review of A. R. Woodcock’s ‘ Annotated List,’ etc. (Bull. 68, Oregon Agric. Exper. Station,. 
Corvallis, Oregon, Jan., 1902). 


Proceedings of the Delaware Valley Ornithological Club.<Awuk, XIX, pp. 
303-304, July, 1902. 


Review of Cassinia for 1901. 


Perkins and Howe’s ‘Preliminary List of the Birds of Vermont.’ <Auk, XIX,. 
pp. 304-306, July, 1902. 


Review of two papers by, respectively, George H. Perkins and Reginald Heber Howe, the 
latter a critique of the former. 


Upland Game Birds. < Amer. Nat., XXXVI, p. 575, Sept., 1902. 


Review of Edwyn Sandys and T. 8. Van Dyke’s work of this title (8vo, New York and 
London, 1902). . 


‘Upland Game Birds.’ <Auk, XIX, pp. 306-307, July, 1902. 
Review of the work. (See supra, No. 663.) 


A.S. Packard’s ‘Lamarck, His Life and Work.’ < Auk, XIX, p. 306, July, 1902. 
Brief review of the work (8vo, London and New York, 1901). 


Richmond’s ‘List of Generic Terms Proposed for Birds during 1890-1900.’ < 
Auk, XIX, pp. 307-308, July, 1902. 


Review of Dr. Charles W. Richmond’s paper of this title (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXIV, 
No. 1267, May, 1902, pp. 663-729). 


Oberholser’s Review of the Horned Larks.<Awk, XIX, pp. 308-309, July, 
1902. 


Review of H. C. Oberholser’s ‘A Review of the Larks of the genus Olocoris’ (Proc. U. S. 
Nat. Mus., XXIV, No. 1271, June, 1902, pp. 801-884). 


Ogilvie-Grant on Recently Described American Galline.<Auk, XIX, pp. 
309-311, July, 1902. 


Critical notice of W. R. Ogilvie-Grant’s paper entitled ‘Remarks on the Species of Ameri- 
can Galline,’ etc. (The Ibis,’ pp. 233-245, April, 1902). 


Grinnell’s ‘Check-List of California Birds.’<Auk, XIX, pp. 405-407, Oct., 
1902. 


Critical review of Joseph Grinnell’s paper of this title (Pacific Avifauna, No. 3, 1902, pp. 
1-92, 2 col. maps). 


671. 


672. 


673. 


674. 


675. 


676. 


677. 


‘678. 


679: 


680. 


681. 


682. 


683. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


* 


Berlepsch and Hartert on the Birds of the Orinoco Region. <Awk, XIX, pp. 
407-408, Oct., 1902. 


Review of their paper in Novitates Zoologice, IX, 1902, pp. 1-134. 


Dubois’s ‘Synopsis Avium.’ <Auk, XIX, p. 409, Oct., 1902. 
Review of Parts V—X, completing Vol. I, 1899-1902. (See supra, Nos. 599, 631.) 


Chapman on Birds from Alaska. < Auk, XIX, p. 414, Oct., 1902. 
Review of F. M. Chapman’s paper (Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X V1, pp. 231-247, 
Aug., 1902). 
So-called Species and Subspecies. <Science, N. S., XVI, pp. 383-386, Sept. 5, 
1902. 


In re Meleagris sylvestris Vieillot.< Auk, XIX, pp. 419-420, Oct., 1902. 


Comment on C. Davies Sherborn’s letter to The Auk under this title, with cee to 
previous editorial criticism of Mr. Ogilvie-Grant (Auk, XIX, p. 311). 


1903. 


The A. O. U. Check-List — Its History and its Future.<Auk, XX, pp. 1-9, 
Jan., 1903. 


Vernacular Names of Birds. <Auk, XX, pp. 70-73, Jan., 1903. 


Mainly in reference to the use of the hyphen in compound names, with other comment in 
relation to Dr. Edwin Doran’s article in the same issue of The Auk (pp. 38-42) proposing 
certain rules for the construction of vernacular names of birds. 


Ridgway’s ‘Birds of North.and Middle America.’<Auk, XIX, pp. 73-76, 
Jan., 1903. 
Review of Part II. (See supra, Nos. 648 and 649.) 


Mrs. Florence Merriam Bailey’s ‘Handbook of Birds of the Western United 
States.’<Auk, XX, pp. 76-78, Jan., 1903. 
Review of the work (12mo, Boston and New York, 1902). 


Brewster’s ‘Birds of the Cape Region of Lower California.’ << Auk, XX, pp. 78- 
80, Jan., 1903. 
Review of the work (Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XLI, Sept., 1902, pp. 1-244, and map). 


[H. W.] Henshaw’s ‘Birds of the Hawaiian Islands.’<Auk, XX, pp. 80-81, 
Jan., 1903. 
Review of the work (8vo, Honolulu, 1902). 


Snodgrass and Heller on the Birds of Clipperton and Cocos Islands. < Auk, 
XX, pp. 81-82, Jan., 1903. 
Review of their paper in Proc. Washington Acad. Sci., 1V, Sept., 1902, pp. 501-520. 


Strong on the Development of Color in Feathers.<Auk, XX, pp. 86-88, 
Jan., 1903. 
Review of Dr. R. M. Strong’s ‘The Development of Color in the Definitive Feather’ 
(Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., XL, 1902, pp. 146-186, pll. i-ix). 
Note on Psittacula modesta Cabanis.<Auk, XX, p. 213, April, 1903. 


Psittacula modesta and P. m. sclateri are considered as both entitled to recognition. 


684. 


685. 


686. 


687. 


688. 


689. 


690. 


691. 


692. 


693. 


694. 


695. 


696. 


697. 


BIRDS. 7G 


Note on Sylvia cerulea Wilson. <Auk, XX, pp. 216-218, April, 1903. 


Sylvia cerulea Wilson not preoccupied by Sylvia cerulea Latham, the latter being not the 
name of a new species but = Motacilla cerulea Linn. transferred to the genus Sylvia. The 
principle involved is discussed at length. 


Ornithological Magazines.< Auk, XX, pp. 219-226, April, 1903. 
Reviews of The Condor, Bird-Lore, and Wilson Bulletin for the year 1902. 


Pycraft on ‘The Significance of the Condition of Young Birds at Birth.’ 
<Auk, XX, pp. 227-228, April, 1903. 


Review of W. P. Pycraft’s paper on this subject (Pop. Sct. Monthly, LXII, Dec., 1902, 
pp. 108-116). 


“Some Suggestions.” < Auk, XX, pp. 234-235, April, 1903. 
Comment on a letter to the editors of The Auk, under the above title, suggesting its 


restricting the output of faunal lists in favor of articles of more popular interest. 


[The American Museum of Natural History.]<Auk, XX, pp. 246-248, April, 
1903. 


Account of the ‘Bird Group’ exhibits in the Museum. 


The California Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union.<Auk, XX, 
pp. 299-302, July, 1903. 


Held in San Francisco, May 15-16, 1903. 


Winkenwerder on the Migration of Birds. < Auk, pp. 311-318, July, 1903. 


Review of H. A. Winkenwerder’s ‘The Migration of Birds, with special Reference to 
Nocturnal Flights’ (Bull. Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc., If, No. 4, Oct. 1902, pp. 177-263). 


North American Water-Fowl.<Auk, XX, pp. 3138-314, July, 1903. 
Review of ‘The Water-Fowl Family,’ by L. C. Sanford, L. B. Bishop and T. S. Van Dyke. 
(8vo, New York, 1903. American Sportsman’s Library series). 
The ‘New’ Edition of Nuttall.< Auk, XX, p. 314, July, 1903. 
Review of Montague Chamberlain’s, ‘A Popular Handbook of the Birds of the United 
States and Canada. By Thomas Nuttall.’ Criticism of the work. 


Scott’s ‘The Story of a Bird Lover.’ < Auk, XX, pp. 315-316, July, 1908. 
Review of W. E. D. Scott’s autobiographical work thus entitled (Svo, New York, 1903). 


Snow’s Catalogue of the Birds of Kansas. < Auk, XX, p. 317, July, 1903. 


Review of the fifth edition of Professor Francis H. Snow’s Catalogue of Kansas Birds 
(reprinted from Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., X VIII). 


Bangs on New Subspecies of American Birds. <Auk, XX, p. 320, July, 1908. 


Brief mention of eight papers by Outram Bangs, in Proc. New England Zool. Club, Vols. 
III and IV, 1902-1903. 


North’s ‘Nests and Eggs of Australian Birds.’< Auk, XX, pp. 321-322, July, 
1908.. 


Notice of the second edition of A. J. North’s work of this title, issued in three parts, 
1901-1903. 


Seth-Smith’s Handbook of Parrakeets.< Auk, XX, pp. 322-323, July, 1903, 
and XXI, p. 96, 1904. 


Review of David Seth-Smith’s ‘Parrakeets, a Handbook to the imported Species’ (Svo, 
London, 1903). 


172 


698. 


699. 


700. 


701. 


702. 


703. 


704. 


705. 


706. 


707. 


708. 


709. 


710. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


J. Macoun’s Catalogue of Canadian Birds. <Auk, XX, p. 441, Oct., 1903. 
Review of Part II. (See supra, No. 624.) 


Dresser’s ‘A Manual of Palearctic Birds.’ < Auk, XX, pp. 441-442, Oct., 1903- 
Review of H. E. Dresser’s work thus entitled (Svo, London, Pt. I, 1902, Pt. II, 1903). 


Huntington’s ‘Our Feathered Game.’ <Auk, XX, p. 448, Oct., 1903. 


Review of Dwight W. Huntington’s book on North American Game Birds (crown 8vo, 
New York, 1903). 


Degen on the ‘Perennial Moult’ in the Australian Crow. <Auk, XX, pp. 444- 
446, Oct., 19038. 


Review of ‘Ecdysis, as Morphological Evidence of the Tetradactyle Feathering of the 
Bird’s Forelimb, based on the Perennial Moult in Gymnorhina tibicen, by Edward Degen 
(Trans. Zool. Soc. London, XVI, pt. viii, May, 1903, pp. 347-412, pll. xxxvi-xxxviii). 


Weed’s Bibliography of Economic Ornithology. < Auk, XX, p. 446, Oct., 1903. 


A brief notice of Clarence M. Weed’s ‘A Partial Bibliography of the Economic Relations. 
of some North American Birds.’ (Tech. Bull. No. 5, New Hampshire College Agric. Exper. 
Station.) 


Stone on Birds of Southern New Mexico and Western Texas.<Auk, XX, p. 
447, Oct., 1903. 


Review of a paper by Witmer Stone and James A. G. Rehn in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. 
Philadelphia, 1903, pp. 16-34. 


Bonhote’s List of Birds Collected in the Bahamas.< Auk, XX, pp. 447-448, 
Oct., 1903. 
Review of J. Lewis Bonhote’s paper in The Ibis, July, 1903, pp. 273-312. 


Ornithological Magazines: ‘The Osprey.’ <Awk, XX, pp. 451-452, Oct., 1903. 


Review of Vol. VI of this magazine. 


F. M. Chapman’s ‘The Economic Value of Birds to the State.’<Auk, XX, 
p. 453, Oct., 1903. 
Review of the work (4to, 1903, State of New York Forest, Fish and Game Commission) . 


The A. O. U. Model Law. <Condor, V, pp. 157-158, Nov., 1903. 


Defense of the provision for ornithological collecting. 


1904. 


Mason A. Walton’s ‘A Hermit’s Wild Friends.’ <Auk, XXI, pp. 87-90, Jan., 
1904. 
Extended criticism of the work (Svo, Boston, 1893). 


Fisher’s ‘Birds of Laysan.’< Auk, XXI, p. 90, Jan., 1904. 


Review of Walter K. Fisher’s paper on ‘Birds of Laysan and the Leeward Islands, 
Hawaiian Group’ (U. S. Fish Comm. Bulletin for 1903, pp. 4-15). 


Jones’s ‘The Birds of Ohio.’< Auk, XXI, pp. 90-91, Jan., 1904. 


Review of Lynds Jones’s work of this title (Ohio State Acad. Sct., Special Papers, No. 6, 
1903, pp. 141, with map). 


Chl. 


12. 


le. 


714. 


715. 


“716: 


GAT. 


718. 


wg: 


720. 


“ial, 


722. 


723. 


BIRDS. lei 


Sharpe’s ‘Hand List of the Genera and Species of Birds.’<Auk, XXI, pp. 
92-93, Jan., 1904. 


Review of Volume IV, 1903. (See supra, Nos. 598, 630 and 651.) 


Ridgway on New American Birds. <Auk, XXI, p. 93, Jan., 1904. 
Brief notice of two important papers (in Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, XVI, pp. 105-113. 
167-170). 


Ernest Hartert’s ‘Der Végel der Palaéarktischen Fauna.’ < Auk, X XI, pp. 94- 
95, Jan., 1904. 


Review of Heft I of this important work (large 8vo, Berlin, 1903). 


The Avicultural Magazine.<Auk, XXI, pp. 95-96, Jan., 1904. 


Review of Vol. I, new series. 


Coues’s ‘Key to North American Birds.’ Fifth Edition.<Auk, XXI, pp. 
292-296, April, 1904. 


Review of this posthumous edition of a celebrated work (2 vols., roy. 8vo, Boston, 1903). 


F. M. Chapman’s ‘Color Key to North American Birds.’<Auk, XXI, pp. 
296-297, April, 1904. 
Review of the work (8vo, New York, 1903). 


Mrs. Wheelock’s ‘Birds of California.’< Auk, XXI, pp. 299-300, April, 1904. 
Review of the work (sm. 8vo, Chicago, 1904). 


Kumlien and Hollister’s ‘The Birds of Wisconsin.’ < Auk, X XI, pp. 301-302, 
April, 1904. 
Review of the work (Bull.. Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc., IIT, 1903). 


Silloway’s ‘The Birds of Fergus County, Montana.’ < Auk, XXI, pp. 302-303, 
April, 1904. 


Review of P. M. Silloway’s paper forming Bull. No. 1, Fergus County High School, 
Lewistown, Mont., 1903. 


Oberholser’s ‘Review of the Wrens of the Genus T'roglodytes.’ << Auk, XXI, pp. 
303-304, April, 1904. 


Review of H. C. Oberholser’s paper of this title (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XX VII, No. 1354, 
Feb., 1904, pp. 197-210, and map). 


Oberholser on the American Great Horned Owls.<Auk, XXI, pp. 304-305, 
April, 1904. 
Review of H. C. Oberholser’s paper ‘A Revision of the American Great Horned Owls’ 
(Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., X XVII, No. 1352, pp. 177-192, Feb., 1904). 


Snodgrass and Heller on the Birds of the Galapagos Archipelago. <<Auk, XXI, 
pp. 305-306, April, 1904. 
Review of paper by Robert Evans Snodgrass and Edmund Heller (Proc. Washington 
Acad. Sci., V, 1904). 


Shufeldt on the Osteology of the Halecyones and Limicole. < Auk, XXI, p. 306, 
April, 1904. 


Review of two papers by R. W. Shufeldt (Amer. Nat., XX XVII, pp. 697-724; Ann. 
Carnegie Mus., II, pp. 15-70, pl. i and 27 text figs.). 


730. 


731. 


(34. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Evans’s ‘Turner on Birds.’ < Auk, X XI, pp. 306-307, April, 1904. 


Review of A. H. Evans’s annotated translation of this early work (8vo, Cambridge, 1903). 


Recent Papers on Economic Ornithology.<Auk, XXI, pp. 307-308, April, 
1904. 


Review of papers by Sylvester D. Judd, Edward Howe Forbush, and H. P. Attwater. 


Summary of Game Laws for 1908.<Auk, XXI, pp. 308-309, April, 1904. 


Based on papers by Henry Oldys, T. S. Palmer, and R. W. Williams, Jr. (Dept. Agric. 
Washington). 


The case of Megalestris vs. Catharacta.< Auk, XXI, pp. 345-348, July, 1904. 


Catharacta Briinnich preoccupied by Catarractes Brisson; extended comment on the case. 


Black-capped Petrel in New Hampshire.<Auk, XXI, p. 383, pl. xxii, July, 
1904. 


W. T. Hornaday’s ‘The American Natural History.’<Auk, XXI, pp. 394-395, 
July, 1904. 


Review of the work (8vo, New York, 1904). 


Boardman’s ‘The Naturalist of the St. Croix.’ <Auk, XXI, pp. 397-398, July, 
1904. 


Review of Samuel Lane Boardman’s ‘Memoir of George A. Boardman’ (8vo, Bangor, 
1903). 


Pearson’s ‘Three Summers among the Birds of Russian Lapland.’ <Awk, XXI, 
pp. 398-399, July, 1904. 


Review of the work (8vo, London, 1904). 


Swarth on the ‘Birds of the Huachuca amc Arizona.’ <Auk, X XI, pp. 
401-402, July, 1904. 


les of Henry S. Swarth’s paper of this title, forming Pacific Avifauna, No. 4, 1904 
(70 pp.). 


Nelson’s ‘Revision of the American Mainland Species of Myiarchus.’<Auk, 
XXI, pp. 403-404, July, 1904. 
Review of E. W. Nelson’s paper of this title in Proc. Biol. Soc. Wischaeae XVII, 1904, 
pp. 151-160: 


Code of Botanical Nomenclature.<Auk, X XI, pp. 404-405, July, 1904. 


Reviewed and compared with the A. O. U. Code (Bull. Torrey Botan. Club, XX XI, No. 5, 
May, 1904.) 


Bird Groups in the American Museum of Natural History. <Auk, X XI, p. 408, 
July; 1904. 


So-called Nature Books. <Auk, KKE p. 409, July, 1904. 


Comment on the works of William J. Long and Mason A. Walton. 


The International Catalogue of Scientific Literature. << Auk, X XI, pp. 494-501, 
Oct., 1904. 


A crilical review of the section ‘Zoology ’’ in the first annual issue. 


738. 


739. 


740. 


741. 


742. 


743. 


744. 


745. 


746. 


747. 


748. 


749. 


BIRDS. ass 


Cooke’s ‘Some New Facts about Bird Migration.’ <Auk, XXI, pp. 501-503, 
Oct., 1904. 


Review of Wells W. Cooke’s paper of this title in Yearbook of U.S. Dept. Agric. for 1903, 
pp. 371-386. 


G. M. Allen’s ‘The Birds of New Hampshire.’ < Auk, X XI, pp. 503-505, Oct., 
1904. 


Review of Glover M. Allen’s paper in Proc. Manchester (N. H.) Enst. Arts and Sciences, 
IV, pt. I, 1902 (1903), pp. 23-222. 


Hartert’s ‘Die Vogel der Palaiarktischen Fauna.’<Auk, XXI, pp. 505-506, 
Oct., 1904. 


Review of Part II. (See supra, No. 713.) 


Kirtland’s Warbler.<Auwk, XXI, pp. 506-507, Oct., 1904. 
Review of papers on this species by Charles C. Adams and Norman A. Wood. 


Forbush on the Destruction of Birds by the Elements. <Auk, XXI, pp. 507— 
509, Oct., 1904. 


Review of E. H. Forbush’s ‘Special Report’ on this subject (Fifty-first Ann. Rep. Massa - 
chusetts State Board of Agric.). 


1905. 


Cooke’s ‘Distribution and Migration of North American Warblers.’ <Auk, 
XXII, pp. 91-92, Jan., 1905. 


Review of Wells W. Cooke’s paper of this title in Bulletin No. 18, Division of Biological 
Survey, U.S. Dept. Agric., 1904. 


Osgood on Birds of Alaska. < Auk, XXII, pp. 92-938, Jan., 1905. 


Review of W. H. Osgood’s ‘A Biological Reconnaissance of the Base of the Alaska Penin- 
sula’ (North Amer. Fauna, No. 24, 1904). 


Preliminary Review of the Birds of Nebraska.<Auk, XXII, pp. 94-95, 
Jan., 1905. 


Review of a brochure of this title by Lawrence Bruner, Robert H. Walcott, Myron H. 
Swenk (8ve, Omaha, no date). 


Scott on the Inheritance of Song in Passerine Birds. <Awk, XII, pp. 95-96, 
Jan., 1905. 


Review of two papers on this subject by W. E. D. Scott, in Science, Vols. XIX and XX, 
1904. 


Scott’s Ornithology of Patagonia. < Auk, XXII, pp. 96-97, Jan., 1905. 
Review of W. E. D. Scott’s Ornithology of Patagonia, Part I, Rheide-Sphenicide (Vol. 
II of the Reports of Princeton University Expeditions to Patagonia, pp. 1-112, 1896-1899). 


Bryan’s ‘A Monograph of Marcus Island.’<Auk, XXII, pp. 98-99, Jan., 
1905. 
Review of Wm. Alanson Bryan’s paper in Occas. Papers of the Bernice Pauahi Mus., 11, 


No. 1, 1903. 


J. Macoun’s ‘Catalogue of Canadian Birds.’<Auk, XXII, pp. 99-100, Jan., 
1905. 
Review of Part III (8vo, Ottawa, 1904). 


176 


750. 


om: 


752. 


753. 


754. 


755. 


756. 


CNG 


758. 


759. 


760. 


761. 


762. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Riley on the Birds of Barbuda and Antigua. <Auk, XXII, p. 101, Jan., 1905. 


Review of J. H. Riley’s ‘Catalogue of a Collection of Birds from Barbuda and Antigua, 
British West Indies.” (Smithsonian Misc. Coll., quart. issue, XLVII, 1904, pp. 277-291). 


Dubois’s ‘Synopsis Avium.’<Auk, XXII, p. 102, Jan., 1905. 


Review of fasc. xiii-xvi, completing Alphonse Dubois’s work of this title (roy. 8vo, 
Bruxelles, 1899-1902). (See supra, Nos. 599, 631, and 671.) 


Report on the Birds Collected in Northeastern Siberia by the Jesup North 
Pacific Expedition, with Field Notes by the Collector. <Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist., X XI, 1905, pp. 219-257, July 24, 1905. 


An annotated list of 127 species. Spp. nov.: (1) Alauda buztoni, p. 247; (2) Anihus 
anadyrensis, p. 254. 


Madarazs’s ‘An Extraordinary Discovery in Ornithology.’<Auk, XXII, 
pp. 102-103, Jan., 1905. 


Review of Julius V. Madar4asz’s paper of this title (Ann. Mus. Nat. Hist. Hungarici, 11, 
1904, pp. 396-398). 


Shalow on Arctic Birds. << Auk, XXII, pp. 103-104, Jan., 1905. 


Review of Dr. H. Shalow’s ‘Die Vogel der Arktis’ in Fauna Arctica, Vol. IV, pt. 1, pp. 
81-288, 1904. 


[Bird Groups in the American Museum of Natural History.]}<Auk, XXII, 
pp. 107-109, Jan., 1905. 


[Work of the A. O. U. Committee for Bird Protection.]<Awuk, XXII, pp. 110- 
112, Jan., 1905. 


The Loggerhead Shrike in Connecticut in Winter. < Auk, XXII, p. 211, April, 
1905. 


Ridgway’s ‘The Birds of North and Middle America.’ <Auk, XXII, pp. 219- 
222, April, 1905. 
Review of Part III. 


Richmond on Birds described by Pallas in 1764.<Auk, XXII, pp. 222-223, 
April, 1905. 
Review of Dr. Charles W. Richmond’s “Notes on the Birds described by Pallas in the 


‘Adumbratiuncula’ of Vroeg’s Catalogue.” (Smithsonian Misc. Coll., quart. issue, XLVII, 
1905, pp. 342-347). 


Harvie-Brown and Macpherson’s ‘A Fauna of the Northwest Highlands and 


Skye.’ <Auk, XXII, p. 228, April, 1905. 
Review of the work (sm. 4to, Edinburgh, 1904). 


Hagmann’s Concordance of Brazilian Birds described by Spix, Wied, Bur- 
meister, and Pelzeln.<Auk, XXII, p. 226, April, 1905. 
Review of Dr. G. Hagmann’s paper in Boletim do Museu Goeldi, IV, 1904. 


Raine on the Eggs of the Solitary Sandpiper. <Auk, XXII, pp. 100-101, Jan., 
1905. 


Summary of Walter Raine’s paper on the ‘ Discovery of the Eggs of the Solitary Sandpiper’ 
(Ottawa Nat., XVIII, pp. 135-138). 


763. 


764. 


765. 


766. 


767. 


768, 


769. 


770. 


(cae 


772. 


773. 


(74, 


775. 


BIRDS. ae 


Shufeldt on the Families and Higher Groups of Birds. <Auk, XXII, pp. 227- 
228, April, 1905. 
Review of R. W. Shufeldt’s ‘An Arrangement of the Families and Higher Groups of Birds’ 
(Amer. Nat., XX XVIII, 1904, pp. 833-857). 


Shelley’s ‘Birds of Africa.’ < Auk, XXII, pp. 228-229, April, 1905. 
Review of Vol. IV, pt. 1 (London, 1905). (See supra, No. 632.) 


Report of the Chief of the Biological Survey (Dr. C. Hart Merriam) for the 
Year ending June 30, 1904.<Auk, XXII, pp. 230-232, April, 1905. 


Review of the Report (in Yearbook Dept. Agric. for 1904). 


[Founding of the National Association of Audubon Societies.]<Auk, XXII, 
p. 232, April, 1905. 


Townsend’s ‘The Birds of Essex County, Massachusetts.’< Auk, XXII, pp. 
322-323, July, 1905. 
Review of Dr. C. W. Townsend’s work of this title (Mem. Nuttall Orn. Club, No. III, 1905). 


Job’s ‘Wild Wings.’<Auk, XXII, pp. 324-325, July, 1905. 
Review of the work (8vo, Boston and New York, 1905). 


Sharpe on the Birds of the Antarctic Regions. << Auk, XXII, p. 325, July, 1905. 


Review of Dr. R. B. Sharpe’s Report on the Birds of the ‘Southern Cross’ Expedition 
(8vo, London, British Museum, 1904). 


Butterfield on Bird Migration. <Auk, XXII, pp. 325-328, July, 1905. 


Review of W. Ruskin Butterfield’s ‘Remarks upon Theories in regard to the Migration 
of Birds’ (in Novitates Zool., XII, pp. 15-20, 1905). 


Nelson on the Names of Certain North American Birds. <Auk, XXII, pp. 330- 
331, July, 1905. 
Review of two papers by E. W. Nelson in Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, X VIII, 1905. 


The Status of certain Swainsonian Genera of Birds. < Auk, XXII, pp. 400-407, 
Oct., 1905. 


Discussion of the status of the genera Xiphorhynchus, Vermivora, Tiaris, and Ammo- 
dramus, first published incidentally in a paper preceding by a few weeks their formal publica- 
tion with designation of a type species for each. 


Stephens’s ‘Life Areas of California.’<Auk, XXII, pp. 424-246, Oct., 1905. 


Review and synopsis of Frank Stephens’s paper of this title (Trans. San Diego, California, 
Soc. Nat. Hist., I, No. 1, 1905). 


Chapman on the Life History of the American Flamingo.<Auk, XXII, p. 
426, Oct., 1905. 


Review of F. M. Chapman’s paper in Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XI, 1905, pp. 53-77, 
with 15 text figs. 


Hartert’s ‘Die Végel der Palaéarktischen Fauna.’<Auk, XXII, pp. 428-429, 
Oct., 1905. 


Review of Heft III. (See supra, Nos. 713, 740.) 


178 


776. 


777. 


778. 


C19: 


780. 


781. 


783. 


784. 


785. 


786. 


787. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Clark on the Amount of Difference that should characterize Species and Sub- 
species. < Auk, XXII, pp. 429-434, Oct., 1905. 


Review of Hubert Lyman Clark’s ‘The Limits of Difference in Specific and Subspecific 
Distinctions’ (in Fifth Ann. Rep. Michigan Acad. Sci., 1903), discussing at length his six 
“fundamental rules.” 


Oberholser on the Nomenclature of Certain Genera of Birds.<Auk, XXII, 
pp. 436-487, Oct., 1905. 


Review of H. C. Oberholser’s paper entitled ‘Notes on the Nomenclature of Certain 
Genera of Birds’ (in Smithsonian Misc. Coll., quart. issue, XLVIII, 1905). 


Forbush on the Decrease of Birds and Means for their Protection. <Auk, 
XXII, pp. 437-488, Oct., 1905. 


Review of E. H. Forbush’s ‘Special Report’ on this subject in 52d Ann. Rep. Massachu- 
setts State Board of Agric., 1905. 


Supplementary Notes on Birds Collected in the Santa Marta District, Co- 
lombia, by Herbert H. Smith, with Descriptions of Nests and Eggs. < Bull. 
Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XI, pp. 275-295, Oct. 4, 1905. 

Additions and corrections, pp. 275-278; descriptions of nests and eggs, 42 species, pp. 
279-295. 


1906. 
The Name of the Western Sandpiper. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 97-98, Jan., 1906. 


Ereunetes occidentalis Lawrence (1864) should give place to Hreunetes maurt Gundlach 
1856. 
Stejneger’s ‘The Birds of the Genus Cinclus and their geographical Distribu- 
tion.’ < Auk, XXIII, pp. 111-112, Jan., 1906. 


Review of Dr. L. Stejneger’s paper of this title (in Smithsonian Misc. Coll., quart. issue, 
XLVIII, 1905). 


Clark’s ‘Birds of the Southern Lesser Antilles.’< Auk, XXIII, pp. 113-114, 
Jan., 1906. 


Review of Austin E. Clark’s paper of this title (in Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XX X11, 
No. 7, 1905). 


Beebe’s ‘Two Bird Lovers in Mexico.’< Auk, XXIII, p. 115, Jan., 1906. 
Review of C. William Beebe’s book of this title (8vo, Boston and New York, 1905). 


Hartzsch’s Birds of Iceland.< Auk, XXIII, pp. 115-116, Jan., 1906. 
Review of Bernhard Hantzsch’s ‘Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Vogelwelt Islands’ (8vo, 


Berlin, 1905). 


Csérgey’s Ornithological Fragments from the Manuscripts of Johann Salamon 
von Petényi.< Auk, XXIII, pp. 116-117, Jan., 1906. 


Review of the work (8vo, Gera-Untermhaus, 1905). 


Harvie-Brown’s ‘Travels of a Naturalist in Northern Europe.’ <Auk, XXIII, 
pp. 117-118, Jan., 1906. 


Review of J. A. Harvie- Brown’s work of this title (2 vols., 8vo, London, 1905)- 


Economic Ornithology. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 119-120, Jan., 1906. 


Review of three papers by Vernon Bailey, S. D. Judd, and W. L. McAtee (Bull. Biol. 
Survey, Nos. 21-23, 1905). 


788. 


789. 


790. 


fol: 


792. 
793. 
794. 


795. 


796. 


097. 


798. 


799. 


800. 


BIRDS. | 179 


Subgenera and Other Matters. < Auk, XXIII, pp. 122-125, Jan., 1906. 


Anent Dr. Ernst Hartert’s protest against certain editorial criticisms of Heft III of his 
‘Die Vogel der Palaarktischen Fauna,’ in The Auk, Vol. X XII, p. 428. 


[First Annual Meeting of the National Association of Audubon Societies. | 
<Auk, XXIII, pp. 126-128, Jan., 1906. : 


General account of the proceedings. 


Thayer and Bangs on Birds from Panama. <Awk, XXIII, pp. 234-235, April, 
1906. 


Review of four papers on Panama birds, chiefly by Outram Bangs. 


Verrill on Birds of Dominica. < Auk, X XIII, pp. 235-237, April, 1906. 


Review of A. Hyatt Verrill’s paper on the ‘Avifauna of Dominica’ (privately printed, 
unpaged, and without date). 


Whitaker’s ‘The Birds of Tunisia.’< Auk, XXIII, pp. 238-240, April, 1906. 
Review of J. I. S. Whitaker’s work of this title (2 vols., large 8vo, London, 1905). 


Ralfe’s ‘The Birds of the Isle of Man.’ < Auk, XXIII, p. 249, April, 1993. 
Review of P. G. Ralfe’s book of this title (8vo, Edinburgh, 1905). 


Economic Ornithology. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 241-242, April, 1906. 
Review of papers by McAtee, Judd. Palmer, and others, published by U.S. Dept. of Agric. 


Buturlin’s ‘The Breeding-grounds of the Rosy Gull.’ <Awk, XXIII, pp. 348- 
349, July, 1906. 
Review of S. A. Buturlin’s paper of this title in The Ibis, 1906, pp. 181-139, 333-337. 


Clarke’s ‘Birds of the South Orkney Islands.’<Auk, XXIII, pp. 350-351, 
July, 1906. 
Review of Wm. Eagle Clarke’s paper of this title in The Ibis, Jan., 1906, pp. 145-187, 


pll. iii—xiii. 


Menegaux and Hellmayr on the Passeres Tracheophones of the Paris Museum. 
<Auk, XXIII, pp. 351-363, July, 1906. 


Review of three papers by these authors published in 1905 and 1906 in Bulletins and 
Memoirs of three different. French scientific societies. See further on this matter, Auk, 
XXIII, pp. 480-483, Oct., 1906. 


‘An Eccological Survey in Northern Michigan.’<Auk, XXIII, p. 354, July, 
1906. 


Review of a Report prepared under the direction of Prof. Chas. C. Adams, University 
of Michigan (8vo, Lansing, Mich., 1906). 


Brewster’s ‘The Birds of the Cambridge Region.’ < Auk, XXIII, pp. 466-470, 
Oct., 1906. 
Review of William Brewster’s work of this title (Mem. Nuttall Orn. Club, No. IV, 1906). 


Report on the Immigration of Birds in England and Wales in the Spring of 
1905.< Auk, XXIII, p. 472, Oct., 1906. 


Review of the Report, by a Committee of the British Ornithologists’ Club (Bull. British 
Orn., Club, XVII, 1906). 


180 


801. 


802. 


803. 


804. 


805. 


806. 


809. 


$10. 


$11. 


$12. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


‘A Hand-List of the Birds of the Philippine Islands.’ < Auk, XXIII, pp. 472— 
473, Oct., 1906. 


Review of Richard E McGregor and Dean C. Worcester’s work of this title (8vo, Manila, 
1906). 


New Names for North American Birds.<Auk, XXIII, pp. 474-475, Oct., 
1906. 


Review of three papers on this subject by H. C. Oberholser and of one by Outram Bangs. 


Palmer on Federal Game Protection. < Auk, XXIII, pp. 475-477, Oct., 1906. 


Review of Dr. T. S. Palmer’s ‘Federal Game Protection — A Five Years’ Retrospect’ 
(in Yearbook of U.S. Dept. of Agric., 1905, pp. 541-562). 


1907. 


The Rio Grande Seedeater, its Status and Technical History.<Auk, XXIV, 
pp. 26-80, Jan., 1907. 


Sporophila morelleti sharpei (Lawrence) shown to be a well-marked subspecies. 


Beebe’s ‘The Bird.’ <Auk, XXIV, pp. 112-113, Jan., 1907. 


Review of C. William Beebe’s work of this title (large 8vo, New York, 1906). 


Hellmayr on Spix’s Types of Brazilian Birds. <Auk, XXIV, pp. 113-114, Jan., 
1907. 


Review of C. E. Hellmayr’s ‘Revision der Spix’schen Typen Brasilianische Vogel’ (Ab- 
handl. der K. B. Akad. Wiss., X XII, pp. 563-726, May, 1906). 


Lonnberg on the Birds of South Georgia.< Auk, XXIV, p. 115, Jan., 1907. 


Review of Einar Loénnberg’s paper:on birds in ‘Contributions to the Fauna of South 
Georgia’ (8vo, = Vet. Akad. Handl., XI, No. 5, 1906). 


Harvie-Brown’s ‘A Fauna of the Tay Basin.’ <Auk, XXIV, pp. 115-117, Jan., 
1907. 


Review of J. A. Harvie-Brown’s book of this title (sm. 4to, Edinburgh, 1906, pp. 1-102, 
pll. i-xii and 7 text figs.). 


Chapman’s ‘The Warblers of North America.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 227-229, 
April, 1907. 
Review of F. M. Chapman’s work of this title (89vo, New York, 1907). 


Alphéraky’s ‘The Geese of Europe and Asia.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 229-230, 
April, 1907. 
Review of Sergius Alphéraky’s work (4to, London, 1905). 


Schiebel’s ‘Phylogeny of the Species of Lanius.’<Auk, XXIV, p. 230, April, 
1907. 


Review of Dr. P. G. Schiebel’s ‘Die Phylogenese der Lanius Arten’ (in Journ. f. Orn., 
1900, pp. 1-77, 161-219, pll. 8, 7 colored). 


Hellmayr on the Types of Little-known Neotropical Birds.< Auk, XXIV, p. 
231, April, 1907. 
Review of C. E. Hellmayr’s paper in Novitates Zool., XIII, July, 1906, pp. 305-352. 


813. 


814. 


815. 


$16. 


817. 


818. 


819. 


820. 


821. 


822. 


823. 


824. 


825. 


826. 


BIRDS. 181 


Cooke’s the ‘Distribution and Migration of North American Ducks, Geese and 
Swans.’ <Auk, XXIV, pp. 232-233, April, 1907. 
Review of Wells W. Cooke’s paper (Bull. Biol. Surv., No. 26). 


Forbush’s ‘Useful Birds and their Protection.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 234-235, 
April, 1907. 


Review of E. H. Forbush’s work thus entitled (8vo, no date, Massachusetts State Board 
of Agriculture). 
Dionne’s Birds of the Province of Quebec. <Auk, XXIV, p. 236, April, 1907. 


Review of C. E. Dionne’s ‘ Les Oiseaux de la Province de Québec’ (8vo, Quebec, 1906). 


Cole on Birds from Yucatan. <Auk, XXIV, p. 237, April, 1907. 
Review of Dr. Leon J. Cole’s ‘Aves’ in ‘Vertebrata from Yucatan’ (Bull. Mus. Comp. 
Zool., L, No. 5, 1906, pp. 100-159. Birds, pp. 109-146). 


Salvin and Godman’s ‘Biologia Centrali-Americana, Aves.’< Auk, XXIV, pp. 
350-352, July, 1907. 


Review of the work (4 vols., 4to, 1879-1905). 


Proceedings of the Fourth International Ornithological Congress. <Awk, 
XXIV, pp. 352-354, July, 1907. 


Review of the volume (Ornis, Vol. XIV, 1907). 


Newton’s ‘Ootheca Wolleyana.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 354-355, July, 1907. 
Review of Part IV, completing the work (London, 8vo, 1905). 


Mershon’s ‘The Passenger Pigeon.’ < Auk, XXIV, pp. 355-357, July, 1907. 
Review of W. B. Mershon’s work of this title (8vo, New York, 1907). 


Forbes’s ‘An Ornithological Cross-section of Illinois in Autumn.’ <Auk, XXIV, 
pp. 358-359, July, 1907. 


Review of Prof. S. A. Forbes’s paper of this title (Bull. Illinois State Laboratory of Nat. 
Hist., VII, pp. 305-335, April, 1907). 
Berlepsch ‘On the Genus Elenia.’< Auk, XXIV, p. 360, July, 1907. 
Review of paper in Proc. [Vth Internat. Orn. Congress, 1905 (1906, pp. 372-448). 


Hartert’s ‘Die Vogel der Palaarctischen Fauna.’<Auk, XXIV, p. 362, July, 
1907. 


Review of Heft IV, March, 1907. 


Woodruff’s ‘The Birds of the Chicago Area.’<Auk, XXIV, p. 363, July, 1907. 


Review of Frank M. Woodruff’s paper of this title (Chicago Acad. Nat. Sci., Bull. No. VI 
of the Nat. Hist. Survey, 1907). 


Fleming on Migrations of Briinnich’s Murre. <Auk, XXIV, p. 364, July, 1907. 


Review of J. H. Fleming’s ‘The Unusual Migration of Briinnich’s Murre (Uria lomvia) in 
Eastern North America,’ in Proc. IVth Internat. Orn. Congress, 1905 (1906), pp. 528-543, 
2 maps. 


The Types of North American Genera of Birds. < Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 
XXIII, pp. 279-284, April 5, 1907. 
On the basis of the principle of elimination in opposition to the “‘ first species rule.”” The 


introductory matter deals with the ‘first reviser’ and ‘Brissonian genera.’ All of the original 
species of each genus are listed, and their subsequent generic disposition shown. 


828. 


829. 


830. 


831. 


832. 


833. 


834. 


835. 


836. 


837. 


838. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


The Belophus bicolor-atricristatus Group.<Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.. 
XXIII, pp. 467-481, June 12, 1907. 


A study in geographic variation, etc. Mr. Ridgway’s conclusion that B. bicolor and B. 
atricristatus freely hybridize in portions of Texas is confirmed. 


Birds of North and Middle America. <Amer. Nat., LXI, pp. 672-673, Oct., 
1907. 


Brief notice of R. Ridgway’s work of this title, Parts I-IV. 


Ridgway’s ‘The Birds of North and Middle America.’ < Auk, XXIV, pp. 450- 
451, Oct., 1907. 
Review of Part IV, 1907. 


Townsend and Allen’s ‘Birds of Labrador.’ < Auk, XXIV, pp. 451-452, Oct., 
1907. 


Review of Dr. Charles W. Townsend and Glover M. Allen’s paper of this title (Proc. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XX XIII, No. 7, 1907, pp. 277-428, with map.) 


Townsend’s ‘Along the Labrador Coast.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 452-453, Oct., 
1907. 


Review of Dr, Charles W. Townsend’s work of this title (8vo, Boston, no date, [1907]). 


Clark on New Birds from Eastern Asia and the Aleutian Islands. <Auk, 
XXIV, p. 458, Oct., 1907. 
Review of paper by Austin H. Clark in Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., XXXII, pp. 467-475, 1907. 


Clarke ‘On the Birds of the Weddell and adjacent Seas.’<Auk, XXIV, pp. 
454-455, 1907. 


Review of William Eagle Clarke’s report on the ornithological results of the Scottish 
National Antarctic Expedition (Ibis, 1907, pp. 325-349 and map.) 


Goeldi’s ‘Album de Aves Amazonicas.’<Auk, XXIV, p. 455, Oct., 1907. 
Review of Dr. Emilio A. Goeldi’s work of this title (4to, 1900-1906). 


Herman’s ‘The Protection of Birds in Hungary.’ <Auk, XXIV, pp. 456-457, 
Oct., 1907. 


Review of Otto Herman’s Report to the Hungarian Government (8vo, Budapest, 1907). 


Anderson’s ‘The Birds of Iowa.’< Auk, XXIV, pp. 458-459, Oct., 1907. 


Review of Rudolph M. Anderson’s paper of this title (Proc. Davenport Acad. Sci., X1, 
pp. 125-417, March, 1907). 


[The Seventh International Congress of Zoédlogy.]< Auk, XXIV, pp. 462-466, 
Oct., 1907. - 


Short account of the Boston Congress (August 19-24, 1907), with a transcript of the new 
Article 30 of the International Code of Zoélogical Nomenclature adopted at this Congress, 
here first published. 


A List of the Genera and Subgenera of North American Birds, with their 
Types, according to Article 30 of the International Code of Zodlogical 
Nomenclature. <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, pp. 1-50, Dec. 26, 
1907. | 


Historical résumé, pp. 3-12, containing comment on ‘ Article 30,’ and on ‘G. R. Gray as a 
First Reviser.’ The determination of types by Rule 30 gives practically the same results as 
by elimination, the two methods giving the same type in 192 out of 197 cases where the type 
depends on ‘subsequent designation.’ 


oS 
4 — 
ee 


839. 


840. 


841. 


842. 


843. 


844. 


845. 


846. 


847. 


$48. 


849. 


850. 


BIRDS. 183 


1908. 


The Generic Names Mycteria and Tantalus of Linneus, 1758,<Auk, XXV, 


_pp. 37-388, Jan., 1908. 
Tantalus, a synonym of Mycteria, is replaced by Jabiru Hellmayr, 1906. 


Widmann’s ‘Birds of Missouri.’ < Auk, XXV, pp. 89-90, Jan., 1908. 


Review of Otto Widmann’s ‘A Preliminary Catalogue of the Birds of Missouri’ (Trans. 
Acad. Sci. St. Louis, XVII, No. 1, pp. 1-288, Nov., 1907). 


Jones on ‘The Development of Nestling Feathers.’ < Auk, XXV, p. 90, Jan., 
1908. 
Review of Dr. Lynds Jones’s paper of this title (Laboratory Bull. No. 13, Oberlin College, 


Ohio, 1907). 
Beebe on Geographic Variation in Birds.<Auk, XXV, pp. 90-98, Jan., 1908. 


Review of C. William Beebe’s ‘Geographic Variation in Birds with especial reference to the 
Effects of Humidity’ (in Zoologica, I, No. 1, 1907, pp. 1-41, with 5 half-tone pll.). 


Braislin’s Birds of Long Island, New York.<Auk, XXV, p. 98, Jan., 1908. 


Review of Dr. Wm. C. Braislin’s ‘A List of the Birds of Long Island, New York’ (in Abst. 
Proc. Linnean Soc. New York for 1907, pp. 31-123). 


Finley’s ‘American Birds.’<Auk, XXV, pp. 93-94, Jan., 1908. 
Review of William Lovell Finley’s work of this title (vo, New York, 1907). 


Thering’s Birds of Brazil.< Auk, XXV, pp. 94-95, Jan., 1908. 


Review of Dr. Hermann von Ihering’s ‘As Aves do Brazil’ (8vo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1907). 


Beal on ‘Birds as Conservators of the Forest,’ and on ‘Birds of California in 
Relation to the Fruit Industry.’<Auk, XXV, pp. 95-97, Jan., 1908. 
Review of two papers on these subjects by Prof. F. E. L. Beal, the first in Rep. New York 
Forest, Fish and Game Comm., 1902-03; the other in Bull. Biolog. Survey, No. 30, 1907). 
Riddle’s ‘A Study of Fundamental Bars in Feathers.’<Auk, XXV, p. 98, 
Jan., 1908. ; 
Review of Oscar Riddle’s paper of this title (Biol. Bull., XII, No. 3, 1907, pp. 165-174). 


Riddle on the Cause of Production of ‘Down’ and other Down-like Structures 
in the Plumages of Birds.< Amer. Nat., XLII, pp. 693-696, Oct., 1908. 
Review of paper by Oscar Riddle (in Biolog. Bull., XIV, pp. 163-176, Feb., 1908). 


Hopkins on the Bony Semicircular Canals of Birds.< Auk, XXV, pp. 98-99, 
Jan., 1908. 


Review of Miss May Agnes Hopkins’s paper on this subject (Biol. Bull., XI, No. 5, 1906, 
pp. 253-265). 


A Twenty-five Year Index to ‘The Auk’ and ‘Nuttall Bulletin.’ <Auwk, XXV, 
pp. 99-100, Jan., 1908. 
Review of Dr. J. Dwight’s ‘Index,’ etc., as above (8vo, Amer. Orn. Union, 1907). 


Annual Report of the National Association of Audubon Societies for 1907. 
<Auk, XOXV; pp. LOl102, Jan., 1908. 
Review of President William Dutcher’s Report as above (Bird-Lore, IX, pp. 285-372). 


184 


852. 


853. 


854. 


855. 


856. 


857. 


858. 


859. 


860. 


861. 


862. 


863. 


864. 


865. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


The Case of Hortulanus Vieillot.< Auk, XXV, pp. 223-224, April, 1908. 


If recognized (under the rule of priority) would supercede Zonotrichia Swainson, 1832. 


Shaw’s ‘The China or Denny Pheasant in Oregon.’ << Auk, XXV, pp. 241-242, 
April, 1908. 
Review of William T. Shaw’s illustrated brochure of this title (Philadelphia, 1908). 


Giglioli’s ‘Avifauna Italica.’<Auk, XXV, p. 242, April, 1908. 
Review of Prof. E. H. Giglioli’s work of this title (8vo, Firenze, 1907). 


Bonhote’s ‘Birds of Britain.’< Auk, XXV, p. 243, April, 1908. 
Review of J. Lewis Bonhote’s illustrated work of this title (Svo, London, 1907). 


‘British Birds.’<Auk, XXV, pp. 248-244, Jan., 1908. 
Review of Vol. I of the magazine British Birds, London, 1907. 


Godman’s ‘Monograph of the Petrels.’< Auk, XXV, p. 244, April, 1908. 


Review of Part I of F. Du Cane Godman’s ‘Monograph’ of the Tubinares (4to, London, 
Dec., 1907). 


The Work of the Biological Survey.<Auk, XXV, pp. 246-247, April, 1908. 


Review of ‘Report on Work of the Biological Survey,’ by James Wilson, Secretary U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (Senate Doc. No. 132, 60th Congress, 1st Session, 1907). 


The Case of Strix vs. Aluco.< Auk, XXV, pp. 288-291, July, 1908. 


Strix shown to belong to the Sériz aluco group, while Aluco is the proper name for the 
Barn Owls. 


Columbina vs. Chemepelia.<Auk, XXV, pp. 301-306, July, 1908. 


Columbina Spix (1825) has priority over Chemepelia Swainson (1827), and under Rule 30 
of the International Code is tenable in place of Chemepelia. 


Walter on Bird Migration.<Auk, XXV, pp. 329-333, July, 1908. 


Review of ‘Theories of Bird Migration ’ by Hubert Eugene Walter (in School Science and 
Mathematics, April-May, 1908), with extended comment on the general subject of bird 
migration. 


‘Cassinia.’< Auk, XXV, p. 335, July, 1908. 


Review of ‘Cassinia, a Bird Annual,’ for 1907. 


Beebe on the Seasonal Changes of Color in Birds.<Auk, XXV, pp. 335-336, 
July, 1908. 


Review of C. William Beebe’s ‘Preliminary Report on an Investigation of the Seasonal 
Changes of Color in Birds’ (Amer. Nat., XLII, pp. 34-38, Jan., 1908). 


Contributions to Philippine Ornithology.<Auk, XXV, p. 336, July, 1908. 


Brief mention of 14 papers on Philippine birds by several different authors, in Philippine 
Journ. Science, II, No. 5, Oct., 1907. 


Menegaux on the Birds of the French Antarctic Expedition.<Auk, XXV, p. 
337, July, 1908. 


Review of Dr. A. Menegaux’s report on the Birds of the Expédition Antarctique Hrgneaise 
1903-1905, under Dr. Jean Charcot (4to, no date). 


866. 


867. 


868. 


869. 


870. 


871. 


872. 


873. 


874. 


875. 


876. 


BIRDS. 185 


Reichenow on Sea-Birds.<Auk, XXV, pp. 337-338, July, 1908. 


Review of Dr. Anton Reichenow’s ‘ Végel des Weltmeers: Die Meeresvégel ‘der ‘ostlichen 
Erdhilfte,’ in Deutsch Siidpolar-Expedition 1901-1903, Vol. X, Zoologie I,¥pp.9435-467, 
with 6 pll. and map. 


Godman’s ‘Monograph of the Petrels.’< Auk, XXV, pp. 338-339, July, 1908. 


Review of Part II. Puffinus godmani, nom. nov., for “‘Puffinus bailloni’’ tentatively 
employed in this work for the Madeiran Shearwater. 


Howard’s ‘The British Warblers.’<Auk, XXV, pp. 339-440, July, 1908. 


Review of Parts I and II of H. Eliot Howard’s work of this title (4to, London, Feb., 1907, 
and March, 1908). 


Stone on ‘Methods of Recording and Utilizing Bird-Migration Data.’ <Auk, 
XXV, pp. 488-490, Oct., 1908. 


Review of Witmer Stone’s paper of this title (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1908, 
pp. 128-156). 


Forbes’s Statistical Study of the Mid-Summer Bird Life of Illinois. <Auk, 
XXV, pp. 491-492, Oct., 1908. 


Review of Prof. S. A. Forbes’s ‘The Mid-Summer Bird Life of Illinois: A Statistical 
Study’ (in Amer. Nat., XLII, August, 1908, pp. 505-519). 


Membership Conditions in the A. O. U.<Auk, XXV, pp. 495-496, Oct., 1908. 


Comment (jointly with F. M. Chapman) in reply to a letter to The Auk under this title 
by John Lewis Childs. 


Riddle on the Genesis of Fault-bars and the Cause of Alternation of Light. 
and Dark Bars in Feathers. < Amer. Nat., XLII, pp. 550-552, August, 1908. 


Review of Oscar Riddle’s paper of this title (Biol. Bull., XIV, No. 6, May, 1908, pp. 328- 
370, pll. xii—xv). 


Pennant’s ‘Indian Zoology.’ <Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXIV, pp. 111- 
116, Feb. 7, 1908). 


Collation of the several editions, and list of species in the 1769 edition, with relation to the 
names employed for them by subsequent authors. Otus bakkamoena p. 3, pl. iii, 1769, is the 
first use of Otus in a generic sense (monotypic). 


1909. 


An American’s Views of Bird Migration.<British Birds, III, pp. 12-19, 
June, 1909. 


Written by request of the Editor of British Birds. 


Chapman’s ‘Camps and Cruises of an Ornithologist.’ <Auk, XXVI, pp. 89-90, 
Jan., 1909. 


Review of F. M. Chapman’s work of this title (8vo, New York, 1908). 


Preble on the Birds of the Athabaska-Mackenzie Region.<Auk, XXVI, 
pp. 90-92, Jan., 1909. 


Review of Edward A. Preble’s ‘A Biological Investigation of the Athabaska-Mackenzie. 
Region’ (North Amer. Fauna, No. 27, Oct., 1908). 


186 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


877. MacFarlane on the Birds of Northwestern Canada. <Auwk, XXVI, pp. 92-93, 
Jan., 1909. 


Review of Roderick MacFarlane’s ‘Notes on the Mammals and Birds of Northern 
Canada,’ in Charles Mair’s ‘Through the Mackenzie Basin,’ etc. (Svo, Toronto, 1908). 


878. Knight’s ‘The Birds of Maine.’ <Auk, X XVI, pp. 93-95, Jan., 1909. 
Review of Ora Willis Knight’s work of this title (Svo, Bangor, 1908). 


879. Godman’s ‘Monograph of the Petrels.’< Auk, X XVI, p. 95, Jan., 1909. 
Review of Part III. 


880. Gadow’s ‘Through Southern Mexico.’<Auk, XXVI, p. 95, Jan., 1909. 
Review of Dr. Hans Gadow’s work of this title (8vo, London, 1908). 


881. Report on the Migration of Summer Residents in England and Wales, in the 
spring of 1907.<Auk, XXVI, p. 96, Jan., 1909. 
Review of the report (= Bull. British Orn. Club, XX, 1908). 


882. The Heath Hen.<Auwk, X XVI, pp. 96-97, Jan., 1909. 


Review of Dr. George W. Field’s report of the ‘Eastern Pinnated Grouse or Heath Hen,’ 
in 42d Ann. Rep. Massachusetts Commissioners on Fisheries and Game for 1907. 


883. Taverner and Swales on the Birds of Point Pelee, Ontario.<Auk, XXVI, pp. 
98-99, Jan., 1909. 


Review of ‘The Birds of Point Pelee,’ by P. A. Taverner and B. H. Swales (in Wilson 
Bulletin, Vols. XIX and XX, 1907-08). 


&84. Bryan on the Birds of Molokai.<Auk, XXVI, pp. 99-100, Jan., 1909. 


Review of Wm. Alanson Bryan’s ‘Some Birds of Molokai.’ (Occas. Papers, B. P. Bishop 
Mus., IV, No. 2, 1908, pp. 43-86). 


885. Annual Report of the National Association of Audubon Societies. < Auk, 
XXVI, pp. 100-101, Jan., 1909. 


Review of President William Dutcher’s Annual Report for 1908 (in Bird-Lore, X, 1908. 
pp. 277-329). 


886. Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Biological Survey for 1908.<Auk, XXVI, 
pp. 101-102, Jan., 1909. 


Review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s Report (in Ann. Reports of U. S. Dept. Agriculture. 
1908). 


887. Richmond’s List of Generic Terms proposed for Birds during 1901-1905. <Auk, 
XXVI, pp. 102-104; Jan., 1909. 


Review of Dr. Charles W. Richmond’s paper in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XX XV, pp. 583- 
655, Dec., 1908. 


888. The Habitat Groups of North American Birds in the American Museum of 
Natural History. <Awk, X XVI, pp. 165-175, pll. icv, April, 1909. 


Inception and history of the construction and installation of the Bird Groups in this 
Museum with special mention of the large ‘Habitat Groups ’ with illustrations from photo- 
graphs of the groups. 


889. Grinnell’s ‘The Biota of the San Bernardino Mountains.’<Auk, XXVI, 
pp: 202-203, April, 1909. 
Review of Joseph Grinnell’s paper of this title (in University of California Publ., Zool., V, 
No. 1, 1908, pp. 1-170, pll. i-xxiv). 


-$90. 


S01. 


892. 


893. 


894. 


895. 


896. 


BUT. 
898. 


899. 


900. 


OO. 


902. 


BIRDS. 187 


Grinnell on Birds of Southeastern Alaska.<Auk, X XVI, pp. 203-204, April, 
1909. 

Review of ‘ Birds and Mammals of the 1907 Alexander Expedition to Southeastern Alaska’ 
(University of California Publ., Zool., V, No. 2, 1909, pp. 171-264, ppl. xxv, xxvi, and 4 text 
figs.). 

Grinnell on Birds Observed at Salton Sea.<Auk, X XVI, p. 204, April, 1909. 

Review of J. Grinnell’s ‘ Birds of a Voyage on Salton Sea’ (Condor, X, 1908, pp. 185-191). 


Chapman on the Life-Histories of the Booby and Man-o’-War Bird. < Auk, 
XXVI, p. 205, April, 1909. | 


Review of F. M. Chapman’s ‘A Contribution to the Life-Histories’ etc., as above (in 
Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory of the Carnegie Inst., Washington, If, 1908 [1909], pp. 
139-151, pll. i-vi). 


Count von Berlepsch on the Birds of Cayenne: <Auk, X XVI, pp. 207-208, 
April, 1909. 


Review of Hans Graf von Berlepsch’s paper ‘On the Birds of Cayenne’ (Novitates Zool., 
XV, 1908, pp. 103-164, 261-324). 


‘Cassinia.’< Auk, X XVI, pp. 208-209, April, 1909. 
Review of Cassinia, a Bird Manual, for 1908. 


Stone’s ‘A Review of the Genus Piaya Lesson.’ <Auk, XXVI, p. 209, April, 
1909. 


Review of Witmer Stone’s paper of this title (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, LX, Pt. 3, 
1908, pp. 492-501). 


Watson’s ‘The Behavior of Noddy and Sooty Terns.’<Auk, X XVI, pp. 209- 
214, April, 1909. 


Review of John B. Watson’s paper of this title (in Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory of 
the Carnegie Inst., Washington, II, 1908 (1909), pp. 187-225, pll. i-xi), with, incidentally, a 
protest against the pedantic jargon of many recent works on psychology and ecology. 


[The Roosevelt Expedition to Africa.|<Auk, X XVI, p. 220, April, 1909. 


Jubilee Meeting of the British Ornithologists’ Union.<Auk, XXVI, pp. 317- 
319, July, 1909. 
Based on the ‘Jubilee Supplement’ to The Ibis, 1909, Vol. II. 


Thayer and Bangs on the Birds of Guadaloupe Island. < Auk, XXVI, pp. 319- 
320, July, 1909. 


Review of ‘The Present State of the Ornis of Guadaloupe Island’ by John E. Thayer and 
Outram Bangs (Condor, X, No. 3, 1908, pp. 101-106). 
New North American Birds. << Auk, X XVI, pp. 321-322, July, 1909. 


Review of three papers, respectively by E. W. Nelson, Thayer and Bangs, and J. Grinnell, 
with comment on the status of Melospiza melodia gouldi Baird and M. m. salionis Grinnell. 


Widmann on ‘The Summer Birds of Shaw’s Garden.’<Auk, XXVI, p. 322, 
July, 1909. 


Review of Otto Widmann’s paper of this title in 20th Ann. Rep. Missouri Botanical 
Garden (pp. 41-80, col. pl.). 


Godman’s ‘Monograph of the Petrels’ << Auk, X XVI, p. 323, July, 1909. 
Brief notice of Part IV. 


188 


903. 


904. 


905. 


906. 


907. 


908. 


909. 


910. 


911. 


912. 


915. 


914. 


915. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Howard’s ‘The British Warblers.’ << Auk, X XVI, pp. 323-326, July, 1909. 
Extended notice of Part III. (See supra, No. 868.) 


Grinnell’s ‘A Bibliography of California Ornithology.’ <Awuk, XXVI, p. 326, 
July, 1909. 


Review of Joseph Grinnell’s paper of this title (Pacific Coast Avifauna, No. 5, 1909). 
Dawson and Bowles’s ‘The Birds of Washington.’ <<Auk, XXVI, pp. 328-329, 
July, 1909. 
Review of William Leon Dawson’s work of this title (2 vols., 4to, Seattle, 1909). 


[Scientific Ornithologists of America and Bird Protection.]|<Auk, XXVI, 
p. 335-336, July, 1909. 


The work of the American Ornithologists’ Union, collectively and by individual members, 
for bird protection, in refutation of statements by Wm. T. Hornaday in Bull. New York Zool. 
Soc., June, 1909. 


Cory’s ‘The Birds of Illinois and Wisconsin.’ <Auk, XXVI, pp. 442-448, Oct., 
1909. 


Review of C. B. Cory’s work of this title (Publ. Field Museum, Zool., Vol. LX, 1909). 
Wright’s ‘Birds of the Boston Public Garden.’<Auk, XXVI, pp. 443-444, 
Oct., 1909. 
Review of Horace W. Wright’s book of this title (12mo, Boston and New York, 1909). 
Hersey and Rockwell on the ‘Birds of the Barr Lake District, Colorado.’ < 
Auk, XXVI, p. 445, Oct., 1909. 
Review of L. J. Hersey and R. B. Rockwell’s paper of this title (Condor, XI, pp. 109-122, 
1909). 


Walcott’s Analysis of the Bird Fauna of Nebraska. <Auk, X XVI, pp. 447-448, 
Oct., 1909. 


Review of Robert H. Walcott’s paper of this title (Proc. Nebraska Orn. Union, IV, Part 2, 
pp. 25-55, pll. i-vi). 
1910. 


Sharpe’s Hand-List of Birds.< Auk, X XVII, pp. 93-95, Jan., 1910. 
Review of the concluding volume (Vol. V) of R. Bowdler Sharpe’s ‘A Hand-List of the 
Genera and Species of Birds.’ (See supra, Nos. 598, 630, 651, and 711.) 


Sharpe’s Hand-List of Birds. < Science, N. S., XX XI, No. 790, pp. 265-267, 
Feb. 18, 1910. 
Review of R. Bowdler Sharpe’s ‘A Hand-List of the Genera and Species of Birds.’ 
Birds of New York. <Science, N. 8., XX XII, No. 816, pp. 247-248, Aug. 19, 
1910. 
Review of Part I of Elon Howard Eaton’s work of this title (4to, Albany, 1909). 


Stone’s ‘ Birds of New Jersey.’ < Auk, XXVII, pp. 95-97, Jan., 1910. 
Review of Witmer Stone’s ‘The Birds of New Jersey.’ in Ann. Report of New Jersey State 
Museum for 1908 (1909). 


G. M. Allen’s List of the Birds of New England.<Auwk, XX VII, p. 97, Jan., 
1910. 


a 2 as) 


916. 


oti. 


918. 


919. 


920. 


920a. 
921. 


922. 


‘923. 


‘924. 


‘925. 


‘926. 


927. 


BIRDS. 189 


Review of ‘Fauna of New England. II. List of Aves,’ by Glover M. Allen (Occasional 
Papers, Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., Vol. VII). 
Osgood’s ‘Biological Investigations in Alaska and Yukon Territory.’<Auk, 
XXVII, pp. 97-98, Jan., 1910. 
Review of Wilfred H. Osgood’s paper of this title (North Amer. Fauna, No. 30). 


Seton on the Mammals and Birds of Manitoba.< Auk, XXVII, p. 98, Jan., 
1910. 
“Review of Ernest Thompson Seton’s ‘Fauna of Manitoba,’ in British Association Hand- 
book, Winnipeg, 1909 (12mo, pp. 47). 
Job’s ‘The Sport of Bird Study.’ <Auk, X XVII, p. 102, Jan., 1910. 
Review of H. K. Job’s book of this title (8vo, New York, 1908). 


Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Biological Survey, 1909.<Auk, X XVII, 
pp. 104-106, Jan., 1910. 
Review of the Annual Report of the Survey for 1909. 


Macoun’s ‘Catalogue of Canadian Birds.’<Auk, XXVII, pp. 107-108, Jan., 
1910. 


Review of the second edition, published in 1909. (See supra, Nos. 624, 698, 749). 
The Bird Plume Bill. < Forest and Stream, Feb. 19, 1910. 


Thayer on Concealing Coloration in Animals.<Auk, XXVII, pp. 222-225, 
Apri, 1910. 


Review of Gerald H. Thayer’s ‘Concealing Coloration in the Animal Kingdom’ (4to, New 
York, 1909 = Feb., 1910). 


Reed and Wright on the Birds of Cayuga Lake Basin, New York. <Auk, 
XXVII, p. 226, April, 1910. 
Review of ‘The Vertebrates of the Cayuga Lake Basin, N. Y.,’ by Hugh D. Reed and 
Albert W. Wright (in Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc., XLVIII, No. 193, 1909). 


L. H. Miller on California Fossil Birds.<Auk, XXVII, pp. 228-230, April, 
1910. 
Review of three papers by Loye Holmes Miller (in The Condor, and Univ. California Publ., 
Geol., V, 1909). 


Ticehurst’s ‘A History of the Birds of Kent.’<Auk, XXVII, pp. 230-232, 
April, 1910. 
Review of the work (8vo, London, 1909). 
J. Grinnell on New North American Birds.<Auk, XXVII, pp. 232-234, 
April, 1910. 


Review of four papers by Joseph Grinnell, with critical comment (in Univ. California 
Publ., Zool., V). ' 


Godman’s ‘A Monograph of the Petrels.’< Auk, XXVII, p. 350, July, 1910. 


Review of F. Du Cane Godman’s concluding Part of the ‘Monograph,’ with comment on 
the work as a whole (large 4to, 106 col. pll., London, 1907-1910). 


Coward’s ‘The Vertebrate Fauna of Cheshire.’<Auk, XXVII, pp. 351-353, 
July, 1910. 


A review of a noteworthy monograph of an English County (2 vols., 8vo, London, 1910). 


190 


928. 


929. 


930. 


931. 


932. 


933. 


934. 


935. 


936. 


937. 


938. 


939. 


940. 


941. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


‘Our Search for a Wilderness.’ < Auk, X XVII, pp. 353-354, July, 1910. 


In Venezuela and British Guiana, by Mr. and Mrs. C. William Beebe (8vo, New York,. 


1910). 


Festa’s ‘In Darien and in Ecuador.’ < Auk, X XVII, p. 354, July, 1910. 
Review of Dr. E. Festa’s ‘Nel Darien e nell’ Ecuador’ (8vo, Torino, 1909). 


Clark on Birds Collected or Observed in the North Pacific Ocean and adjacent: 


Seas. < Auk, XXVII, pp. 357-358, July, 1910. 
‘Review of the paper (Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 1727, April 30, 1910). 


The A. O. U. Check-List of North American Birds. Third Edition. <Auk,. 


XXVII, pp. 466-472, Oct., 1910. See also zbid., XXVIII, p. 122. 


A statistical and historical review of the third in comparison with previous editions of the: 


A. O. U. Check-List. (8vo, pp. 430. New York, August, 1910.) 


Wayne’s ‘Birds of South Carolina.’< Auk, X XVII, pp. 472-474, Oct., 1910. 
Review of Arthur Trezevant Wayne’s work of this title (8vo, Charleston Museum, 1910). 


A Biography of William MacGillivray. <Auk, XXVII, pp. 474-476, Oct., 1910.. 


Review of William MacGillivray’s ‘Life of William MacGillivray,’ the great Scottish 
ornithologist and professor of natural history at Aberdeen University (8vo, London, 1910). 


Collation of Brisson’s Genera of Birds with those of Linnzeus. <Bull. Amer.. 


Mus. Nat. Hist., XXVIII, pp.'317-835; Nov. 1h ro: 


1911. 
‘A Naturalist in the Bahamas.’ Auk, XXVIII, p. 126, Jan., 1911. 


A memorial volume, by Henry Fairfield Osborn, containing the collected papers and a 


biographical sketch of John I. Northrop (8vo, New York, 1910). 


Cooke’s ‘ Distribution and Migration of North American Shorebirds.’ < Auk,. 


XXVIII, pp. 126-128, Jan., 1911. 
Review of Wells W. Cooke’s paper of this title (Biological Survey Bull. No. 35). 


Beck’s ‘Water Birds of the Vicinity of Point Pinos, California.’ << Auk, XXVIII, 


pp. 128-129, Jan., 1911. 


Review of Rollo Howard Beck’s paper of this title (Proc. California Acad. Sci., ser. 4, III, 
1910). 


Townsend’s ‘A Labrador Spring.’< Auk, XXVIII, p. 129, Jan., 1911. 
Review of Charles W. Townsend’s book of this title (12mo, Boston, 1909). 


Hartert on the Proper Names of Various Species of British Birds. <Auk, 
XXVIII, p. 130, Jan., 1911. 
Notice of Ernst Hartert’s ‘Notes on [the nomenclature of] Various Species of British. 
Birds’ (British Birds, IV, 1910, pp. 129-136). 
Gladstone’s ‘The Birds of Dumfriesshire.’ < Auk, XXVIII, p. 131, Jan., 1911. 
Review of Hugh S. Gladstone’s ‘The Birds of Dumfriesshire, a Contribution to the Fauna 
of the Solway Area’ (8vo, London, 1909). 


Gunning and Haagner’s ‘A Check-List of the Birds of South Africa.’ <Auk, 
XXVIII, pp. 1338-134, Jan., 1911. 


Review, with technical comment (Ann. Transvaal Mus., 11, July, 1910, suppl., 84 pp.). 


4 
g 


942. 


943. 


944. 


945. 


946. 


947. 


948. 


949. 


950. 


951. 


952. 


953. 


BIRDS. 191 


[Gregory M.] Mathews’s ‘The Birds of Australia.”’<Auk, XXVIII, p. 135, 
Jan., 1911. 
Review of Parts I and II (Roy. 4to, with text figs, and colored plates, London, 1910). 


Swarth’s ‘Birds and Mammals of the 1909 Alexander Alaska Expedition.’ 
<Auk, XXVIII, p. 277, April, 1911. 


Review of Harry S. Swarth’s paper of this title in Univ. of California Publ., Zoology, VII, 
No. 2, 1911). 


Tracy’s ‘Significance of White Markings in Birds of the Order Passeriformes.’ 
<Auk, XXVIII, pp.. 278-279, April, 1911. 


Summary of Henry Chester Tracy’s paper of this title (Univ. California Publ., Zoology ,. 
VI, No. 13, 1910). 


The Arizona ‘Passenger Pigeons.’ <Science, N. 8., XX XII, No. 841, pp. 217- 
219, Feb. 10, 1911. 


Critique of.‘ Notes on the Passenger Pigeon,’ by W J McGee, in Science, N. S., XXXII, 
pp. 958-964, Dec. 30, 1910, in which he claimed Passenger Pigeons were seen by him in 1905 
in the ‘“‘Sierra Gila, seventy-five miles southwest of Yuma and near the Mexican boundary.”’ 


McGee’s ‘ Notes on the Passenger Pigeon.’ < Auk, XXVIII, p. 289, April, 1911. 
Refers to the above-cited papers by McGee and Allen. (See supra, No. 945.) 


Hellmayr’s ‘The Birds of the Rio Madeira.’ < Auk, XXVIII, p. 376, July, 1911. 
Review of C. E. Hellmayr’s paper of this title, in Novitates Zool., X VII, Dec., 1910. 


Menegaux on Birds of Ecuador. <Awuk, XXVIII, p. 376, July, 1911. 


Notice of A. Menegaux’s ‘Etude des Oiseaux de l’Equateur rapportés par le Dr. Rivet’ 
(in Mission du service géograph. de | Armée pour la mesure d’un Arc de Méridian equatorial. 
en Amér. du Sud, 1899-1906, t. IX). 


‘Feathers and Facts.’< Auk, XXVIII, pp. 377-378, July, 1911. 


Review of ‘Feathers and Facts: A Reply to the Feather-Trade,’ etc., printed for the. 
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, and of other (then) recent brochures dealing with 
the same subject. 


Mathews’s Proposed Changes in the Nomenclature of Birds. < Auk, XXVIII, 
pp. 495-498, Oct., 1911. 


Critical review of three papers by Gregory M. Mathews containing numerous proposed 
changes in the nomenclature of birds, in opposition (in many cases) to the International Code 
of Zoélogical Nomenclature. 


Roosevelt’s ‘Revealing and Concealing Coloration in Birds and Mammals.’ 
<Auk, XXVIII, pp. 472-480, Oct., 1911. 


Review of Theodore Roosevelt’s paper in Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XXX, pp. 119-231, 
Aug. 23, 1911, and incidental comment on the general topic. 


1912. 


Mathews’s ‘The Birds of Australia.’< Auk, X XIX, p. 124, Jan., 1912. 


Review of Part 5 of this work, completing Vol. I, with critical comment on the nomen-- 
»clature adopted in the case of certain genera of Penguins, etc. (See supra, No. 942.) 


[Mathews’s Notes on Nomenclature.]<Auk, XXIX, Jan., 1912, pp. 133-135. 


An editorial rejoinder to Gregory M. Mathews’s paper of this title (ibid., pp. 131-133),. 
with special reference to the genus (Colvmbus Linné (1758) and Colymbus Brisson (1760). 


192 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


954. Columbina vs. Chemepelia.<Science, N. S., XX XIII, No. 844, pp. 336-337, 
March 38, 1912. 


Columbina griseola Spix designated as type of Columbina. 


955. [Ridgway’s] ‘Birds of North and Middle America.’ <Science, N. 8., XXXV, 
No. 900, pp. 499-501, March 29, 1912. 


Review of Part V, issued Nov. 29, 1911. 


1913. 
956. Scharff’s ‘Distribution and Origin of Life in America.’<Auk, XXX, pp. 283- 
286, April, 1913. 
Extended critical review of the work (8vo, New York, 1912). 


1914. 


957. Birds of New York. <Science, N.S., XL, No. 1036, p. 677, Nov. 6, 1914. 


Review of Part 2 of Elon Howard Eaton’s ‘Birds of New York’ (4to, Albany, 1914). 
(See supra, No. 912, for review of Part I.) 


1915. 


958. Roosevelt’s ‘Through the Brazilian Wilderness.’< Amer. Mus. Journ., XV, 
pp. 64-65, Feb., 1915. 


Short review of the work (8vo, New York, 1914). 


959. ‘The Auk’ Index, 1901-1910<Auk, XXXII, p. 242, April, 1915. 
Notice of the ‘Ten Year Index’ to The Auk (Vols. XVIII-XX XVII, 1901-1910). 


Nots.— The above list contains 966 titles, numbered as follows: 1-959, plus 9a, 
318a, 406a, 475a, 523a, 621a, 920a. 


GENERA, SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES DESCRIBED AS NEW OR RENAMED. 


New Genera. 


Paleospiza, Bull. U. 8. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, No. 2, May 3, 1878, p. 443, 
pli 
Myrmochanes, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, p. 95, March, 1889. 
Rhopocichla, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 199, Feb. 20, 1891. (Preoccupied 
_ by Rhopocichla Oates, 1889). 
Porphyriornis, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, p. 57, May 9, 1892. 


New Species and Subspecies. 


1875. ‘ 


Ammodramus caudacutus var. nelsoni, Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVII, March, 
1375, po. 298. 


BIRDS. 193 


1876. 


Falcinellus ridgwayi, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., III, No. 15, July, 1376, p. 335. 
Gallinula garmani, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodél., III, No. 15, July, 1876, p. 357. 


1877. 
Coccygus lindeni, Bull. Essex Inst., VIII, No. 8, 1876, p. 81, Feb., 1877. 


1878. 


Paleospiza bella, Bull. U. 8S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, No. 2, p. 443, pl. i, 
May 3, 1878. 


1888. 


Ammodramus maritimus peninsule, Auk, V, p. 284, July, 1888. 
Ammodramus maritimus sennettt, Auk, V, p. 286, July, 1888. 
Tityra nigriceps, Auk, V, p. 287, July, 1888. 


1889. 


Anabazanops immaculatus, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, p. 96, March 22, 1889. 
Picolaptes obtectus, tbid., II, p. 94. 

Myrmochanes hypoleucus, ibid., II, p. 95. 

Carpophaga rusbyi, ibid., II, p. 95. 

Phlogopsis notata, ibid., II, p. 97. 

Scytalopus bolivianus, ibid., II, p. 96. 

Empidonax bolivianus, ibid., II, p. 86. 

Chiroxiphia pareola boliviana, tbid., I, p. 87. 

Enicornis striata, tbid., II, p. 89. 

Leptasthenura fuliginiceps boliviana, ibid., II, p. 91. 

Synallaxis griseiventris, ibid., II, p. 91. . ; 

Cyclorhis flavipectus trinitatis, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., II, p. 131, June 17, 1889. 
Thryothorus longipes, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IT, p. 138, June 28, 1889. 
Thryothorus macrurus, tbid., II, p. 137. 

Platyrhynchus bifasciatus, ibid., II, p. 141. 

Platyrhynchus insularis, vbid., II, p. 143. 

Euscarthmus ochropterus, tbid., I, p. 148. 

Sublegatus virescens, ibid., II, p. 149. 

Thamnophilus doliatus mexicanus, ibid., II, p. 151. 


1890. 
Icterus northropi, Auk, VII, p. 348, Oct., 1890; ¢bid., VIII, pl. i, colored. 


1891. 


Mimocichla verrillorum, Auk, VIII, p. 217, April, 1891. 
Callista margarite, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., III, p. 351, Sept. 29, 1891. 
Zonotrichia capensis costaricensis, ibid., III, p. 374. 


194 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1892. 


Ramphocelus atrosericeus capitalis, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, p. 51, April 6, 
1892. 

Lophotriccus substriatus, tbid., IV, p. 538, May 9, 1892. 

Picumnus obsoletus, tbid., IV, p. 55. 

Porphyriornis comeri, ibid., IV, p. 57. 


1893. 


Pygmornis chapadensis, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., V, p. 122, July 19, 1893. 
Piaya cayana cabanist, ibid., V, p. 136. 
Buteo albicaudatus sennetts, tbid., V, p. 144. 


1900. 


Odontophorus atrifrons, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XIII, p. 127, Aug. 25, 1900. 
Myiobis assimilis, ibid., XIII, p. 144. 

Ochtheca jesupt, tbid., XIII, p. 151. 

Ochtheca olivacea, tbid., XIII, p. 152. 

Aitila parvirostris, ibid., XIII, p. 153. 

Attila rufipectus, tbid., XIII, p. 153. 

Grallaria bangst, tbid., XIII, p. 159. 

Hylophilus brunneus, ibid., XIII, p. 171. 


1905. 
Alauda buxtoni, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., X XI, p. 247, July 24, 1905. 
Anthus anadyrensis, ibid., XXI, p. 254. 


1908. 


Puffinus godmani, nom: nov. for ‘‘ Puffinus bailloni’”’ of Godman’s ‘Monograph of 
the Petrels,’ Auk, p. 338, July, 1908. 


MEDEA LmS SRE Made ai 


REPTILES. 195 


TE Re EES: 


1868. 


Catalogue of the Reptiles and Batrachians found in the Vicinity of Springfield, 
Mass., with notices of all other species known to inhabit the State. <Proc. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XII, pp. 171-204, Dec., 1868. 


Reptilia, 24 spp.; Amphibia, 21 spp. 


1869. 


[Appendix to the Catalogue of Reptiles and Batrachians of Massachusetts.| 
<Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XII, pp. 248-250, Feb., 1869. 


Notes on 7 species. 


1870. 


Notes on Massachusetts Reptiles and Batrachians.<Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., XIII, 1870, pp. 260-263, April, 1870. 


Notes on 6 species, and a list of Reptiles and Batrachians found in the vicinity of New 
Bedford, Mass., on information furnished by Mr. R. C. Ingraham. Malacoclemmys palustris 
Agassiz new to the Massachusetts list. 


1874. 


Notes on the Natural History of Montana and Dakota. < Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. 
Hist., XVII, pp. 33-91, Nov., 1874. 


IV. Report on the Reptiles, pp. 68-69. An annotated list of 9 species. V. Report 
on the Batrachians, p. 70. An annotated list of 4 species. 


1908. 


Ruthven’s Variations and Genetic Relationships of the Garter-snakes. < Amer. 
Nat., XLII, pp. 552-559, August, 1908. 
Review of A. G. Ruthven’s paper (Bull. 61, U. S. Nat. Mus., 1908). 


196 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


IV. ZOOGEOGRAPHY. 


1. On the Mammals and Winter Birds of East Florida....and a Sketch of the 
Bird Faune of Eastern North America. <Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., I, No. 3, 
April, 1871, pp. 161-450. : 


Part V. On the Geographical Distribution of the Birds of Eastern North America, with | 


special reference to the Number and Circumscription of the Ornithological Faune, pp. 375—- 
425; List of Authorities, pp. 426-450. 

**In accordance with the facts stated above respecting the mode of the distribution of 
animals and plants over the earth’s surface, and the zodlogical and botanical laws of the 
differentiation and mutual relations of the different regions, the following primary natural 
history divisions may be recognized: I, an Arctic Realm;! II, a North Temperate Realm; 
III, an American Tropical Realm; IV, an Indo-African Tropical Realm; V, a South Ameri- 
can Temperate Realm; VI, an African Temperate Realm; VII, an Antarctic Realm; VIII, 
an Australian Realm”’ (p. 380). 

For eastern North America are recognized the following seven faunz: (1) Floridian, (2) 
Louisianian, (3) Carolinian, (4) Alleghanian, (5) Canadian, (6) Hudsonian, (7) American 
Arctic. Their boundaries and their characteristic species of birds are given (pp. 387-404), 
and they are further considered with reference to mammals and reptiles (pp. 404-406). 

The species of North American birds are considered and tabulated with reference to their 
geographical ranges (pp. 407-418). General remarks on the distribution and migration of 
the birds of the Eastern Province (pp. 418-425). A Bibliography of ornithological works and 
papers, or ‘‘List of Authorities,” relating to North America occupies pages 426-450, geo- 
graphically arranged by States and countries, and numbering 346 titles — much the largest. 
list of papers relating to North American ornithology that appeared prior to 1878. 


1878. 


2. The Geographical Distribution of the Mammalia, considered in relation to the 
principal Ontological Regions of the Earth, and the Laws that govern the 
Distribution of Animal Life.<Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., IV, 
No. 2, pp. 313-337, May 3, 1878. 


I. General considerations, with criticism of the life-regions proposed by Dr. P. L. Sclater 
and supported by Mr. Alfred R. Wallace, pp. 313-329; II. Mammalian Regions of the 
Globe, pp. 329-373; III. General Summary, pp. 373-377. 

The primary divisions are essentially as laid down in 1871 (see above), except that a 
South African Temperate Realm is admitted, and Madagascar is recognized as an additional 
Realm, designated as the Lemurian Realm. Under these are defined regions of secondary 
and tertiary rank where such subdivisions seemed to be required. 


1391: 


3. Merriam’s ‘Results of a Biological Survey of the San Francisco Mountain 
Region and Desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona.’ < Auk, VIII, pp. 95-98, 
Jan., 1891. 


Review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s paper of this title (V. Amer. Fauna, No. 3, Sept. 1 
1898), mainly with reference to the portion relating to ‘Generalizations concerning the Distri- 
bution of Life in North America.’ 


1 Divisions I and II are essentially the same as Triurctic of Heilprin (1882), renamed Holarctic by 
Heilprin in 1883, by suggestion of Alfred Newton, and since commonly known as Holarctic by those 
who reject the Sclaterian system of zo6geographical divisions. Arctogea of Huxley (1868) is more 
comprehensive. 


E 2 
ZOOGEOGRAPHY. 197 


1892. 


4. Merriam on the Life Areas of North America.<Auk, IX, pp. 377-382, Oct., 


1892. 
Synoptic review of Dr. C. Hart Merriam’s ‘The Geographic Distribution of Life in North 
America with special reference to the Mammalia’ (Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, VII, pp . 1-64, 


and map, April, 1892). 


5. The Geographical Distribution of North American Mammals. <Bull. Amer. 
Mus. Nat. Hist., IV, pp. 199-248, pll. v-viii (colored maps), Dec. 29, 1892. 


Influences determining the Geographical Distribution of Life, pp. 199-203; Systematic 
Classification of Life Areas, pp. 203-206; Primary Life Regions, pp. 206-207 (same as in No. 2 
supra); North Temperate Realm, pp. 207-211; The Sclaterian System, pp. 211-212; The 
Mammals of North America considered in relation to the North American Region and its 
Subdivisions, pp. 213-240; Tropical North America, pp. 240-243; Tabular Synopsis, p. 243. 


1893. 


6. The Geographical Origin and Distribution of North American Birds, considered 
in relation to Faunal Areas of North America. <Auk, X, pp. 97-150, pll. i, 
iv (colored maps), July, 18938. 
I. The Geographical Origin and Distribution of North American Birds, pp. 98-117; 
II. The Faunal Subdivisions of North America, considered with reference to their Relation- 


ships, Classification and Nomenclature, pp. 117-150 (tabular synopsis, p. 150). 
The classification adopted is essentially the same as that recognized in 1892 (see supra, 


No. 5). 


7. The Faunal Position of Lower California. << Auk, X, pp. 306-307, July, 1893. 
In reply to comment by Dr. Merriam under this title (/. c., pp. 305-306). 


1905. 


8. Report on the Mammals collected in Northeastern Siberia by the Jesup North 
Pacific Expedition. << Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., XTX, pp. 101-184, March 


dl, 1903. 


American affinities of certain East Siberian Mammals, pp. 182-184. 


9. Stephens’s ‘Life Areas of California.’< Auk, XXII, pp. 424-426, Oct., 1905. 
Synoptic summary of Frank Stephens’s paper of this title (Trans. San Diego, California, 
Soc. Nat. Hist., I, No. 1, 1905, pp. 1-8 and map), with comment. 


. 


198 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


V. EVOLUTION.! 


13.01, 


1. Mammals and Winter Birds of East Florida, etc.<Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., II, 
No. 3, pp. 161-450, April, 1871. 


Part III. On Individual and Geographical Variation among Birds, considered in respect 


to its bearing upon the Value of certain assumed Specific Characters, pp. 186-250. 

Wide range of individual variation shown to occur in a considerable number of species, 
with extensive tables of measurements, pp. 186—226; correlation of variations in general size, 
size of bill, etc., and in coloration, with differences in climatic and geographic conditions, pp. 
229-242; species, varieties, and geographical races, pp. 242-250. A presentation of facts, 
without discussion of any theories of evolution, which appeared later (see infra, No. 7). 


1872. 


2. Notes of an Ornithologicai Reconnaissance, etc.< Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., III, 
pp. 113-118, July, 1872. 


In the introduction the general subject of geographical variation is discussed and new 
facts presented. 


3. Geographical Variation in Color among North American Mammals and Birds. 
<Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XV, 156-159, Sept., 1872. 


Abstract of a verbal communication, summarizing the general subject, with comment by 
other speakers. 


4. Geographical Variation in North American Birds. < Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 
XV, pp. 212-219, Dec., 1872. 


A general résumé of the author’s studies of the subject, to that date. (Republished in 
Amer. Nat., VIII, pp. 534-541, Sept., 1874). 


1874. 


5. Geographical Variation in Color in North American Squirrels. <<Proc. Boston 
Soc. Nat. Hist., XVI, pp. 276-294, May, 1874. 


The introductory matter (pp. 276-286) relates to this subject. See especially the footnote 
to pp. 277, 278, giving references, etc., to previous discussions of the general subject of geo- 
graphical variation in mammals and birds by the author and others. 


1876. 


6. Geographical Variation among North American Mammals. <Bull. Geogr. and 
Geol. Surv. Terr., II, No. 4, July 1, 1876, pp. 309-344. 


The correlation of size with geographical variation is formulated (p. 310) under the three 
propositions: 

‘*(1) Maximum physical development of the individual is attained where the conditions 
of environment are most favorable to the life of the species... . 


1 Exclusive of numerous incidental references in many general papers and reviews. 


Fa ae Oy 


EVOLUTION, 199 


‘*(2) The largest species of a group (genus, subfamily, or family, as the case may be) are 
found where the group to which they severally belong reaches its highest development, or 
where it has what may be termed its center of distribution... . 

“*(3) The most ‘typical’ or most generalized representatives of a group are found also 
near its center of distribution, outlying forms being generally more or less ‘aberrant’ or 
specialized... .”’ 


1877. 


7. The Influence of Physical Conditions in the Genesis of Species. < Radical 


10. 


ff 


12. 


13. 


Review, I, No. 1, pp. 108-140, May, 1877. (Republished, by request, in the 
Ann. Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1905 (1906), pp. 375-402). 


‘**The doctrine of natural selection, or the survival of the fittest, has recently been brought 
forward as the key to this complex problem, and is upheld by a large class of enthusiastic 
adherents, who accept it as the full solution of the whole question. By others the conditions 
of environment are believed to be far more influential in effecting a certain class of modifica- 
tions, at least, than the necessarily precarious influence of natural selection,” etc. 

The direct modifying influence of environment as a factor in evolution is regarded as more 
potent than natural selection taken in the narrow sense of the “‘survival of the fittest.”’ 


1880. 


Origin of the Instinct of Migration. < Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, V, pp. 151-154, 
July, 1880. 


1883. 


Note on Exceptions to the Law of Increase in Size Northward among North 
American Birds. < Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, VIII, pp. 80-82, April, 1883. 


In certain genera of Oscines, for the most part tropical in distribution. 


1885. 


Sexual Selection and the Nesting of Birds.< Auk, II, pp. 129-139, April, 1885. 


In reference to Wallace’s ‘Theory of Birds’ Nests’ (Intellectual Observer, July, 1867), and 
Dixon’s ‘On the Protective Colour of Eggs’ (in Seebohm’s Hist. Brit. Birds, Introd., pp. x- 
XXXVil). 


1892. 


[Variations in Vertebrated Animals.]< Amer. Nat., XX VI, pp. 87-89, Jan., 1892. 


Abstract of a paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Naturalists held 
in Philadelphia; Dec. 29-30, 1891, in a joint discussion of ‘Definite vs. Fortuitous Variation.’ 


1893. 


Keeler on the ‘Evolution of the Colors of North American Birds.’<Auwk, X, 
pp. 189-195, 377-380, April and Oct., 1893. 


A review of Charles A. Keeler’s work of this title (Svo, San Francisco, 1893), adverse to 
his theories. 


Beddard’s ‘Animal Coloration.’ < Auk, X, pp. 195-199, April, 1893. 


A review of Frank E. Beddard’s work of this title (8vo, London and New York, 1892), 
with approving comment of the author’s attitude respecting *‘protective coloration,” “‘warn- 
ing colors,”’ “‘sexual coloration,’’ and ‘“‘mimicry,”’ for which he finds little in support of these 
popular theories. 


200 


14. 


15. 


16. 


17. 


18. 


19: 


20. 


ite 


22. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


e 


S97. 


The Discrimination of Species and Subspecies. <Science, N. S., V, pp. 877-879, 
June 4, 1897. 


Apropos of Dr. C. H. Merriam’s ‘Suggestions for a New Method of Discriminating be- 
between Species and Subspecies,’ published in a preceding number of Science. 


1898. 


‘A Precise Criterion of Species.’ <<Science, N.S., VII, pp. 801-802, June 10, 1898. 


A criticism of Davenport and Blankinship’s paper of this title in Science for May 20, 
1898, on the quantitive study of variation in species. 


1899. 


Davenport’s Statistical Methods.< Amer. Nat., XX XIII, pp. 974-975. 


Criticism of ‘Statistical Methods with special reference to Biological Variation’ by C. B. 
Davenport (12mo, New York, 1899). 


1902. 


‘So-called Species and Subspecies.’ <Sccence, N. S., XVI, pp. 383-386, Sept. 5, 
1902. 


Discussion of the subject, apropos of an article under the same title in a previous number 
of Science by Hubert Lyman Clark. 


1905. 


The Probable Origin of Certain Birds. <Science, N.S., XXII, No. 562, pp. 4381- 
434, Oct. 6, 1905. 


Criticism of W. E. D. Scott’s resort to the ‘mutation theory’ of deVries, in accounting for 
the origin of certain North American birds (Science, X XIII, pp. 272-282, Sept. 1, 1905). 


The Evolution of Species through Climatic Conditions. <Science, N. S., XXII, 
No. 569, pp. 661-668, Nov. 24, 1905. 
Apropos of a paper by D. S. Jordan on ‘The Origin of Species through Isolation’ (Science, 
XXII, pp. 545-552). 


1906. 
Heredity and Subspecies. <Science, N. S., XXIII, pp. 142-145, Jan. 26, 1906. 


Discussed with reference to papers by Dr. D. S. Jordan on the same subject in previous 
issues of Science. 


‘Barriers’ and ‘Bionomic Barriers’; or Isolation and Non-Isolation as Bionomic 
Factors. <Science, N. 8., XXIII, pp. 310-312, Feb. 23, 1906. 
In reference to papers on the same subject by Jordan and Evermann in previous issues 


of Science. 


1907. 


Mutations and the Geographic Distribution of nearly related Species in Plants 
and Animals.<Amer. Nat., XLI, pp. 653-655, Oct., 1907. 


i a 


ian) 


NOMENCLATURE. 201 


VI. NOMENCLATURE! 


1883. 
On Trinomial Nomenclature. <Zodlogist, 3d ser., VII, pp. 97-100, March, 1883. 


1884. 


‘Are Trinomials Necessary?’ < Auk, I, pp. 102-104, pp. 200-202, Jan. and April, 


1884. 
Replies to this question, raised by Montague Chamberlain (ibid., pp. 101-102, 198-200). 


‘Can We not have a Simpler System of Nomenclature?’ <Auk, I, pp. 297-300, 
July, 1884. 
A letter of this title and editorial reply. 


“A Lay View of ‘Ornithophilologicalities.’’”’ <Awuk, I, pp. 300-304, July, 1884. 
An editorial reply to a letter of this title. 


Zoological Nomenclature. << Auk, I, pp. 338-353, Oct., 1884. ‘ 


On trinomial nomenclature, with particular reference to the views and practices of English 
ornithologists, apropos of a discussion of the “‘ Expediency, or otherwise, of adopting Trinomial 
Nomenclature in Zoélogy,’’ held in the Lecture Room of the Natural History Museum, 


London, July 2, 1884. 


Stejneger on Trinomials in American Ornithology. <Auk, I, pp. 381-382, Oct., 


1834, 


Review of Dr. L. Stejneger’s paper of this title (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., VII, 1884, pp. 
‘70-81, July 1, 1884), in which the history of trinomials is briefly given. 


1887. 


[The Antedating of papers and works on Natural History.]<Auk, IV, p. 176, 
April, 1887, and ibid., p. 270, July, 1887. 
With special reference to the ‘Proceedings’ and other publications of the U. S. National 
Museum. 


1890. 


Waterhouse’s ‘Index Generum Avium.’<Awk, VII, pp. 71-73, Jan., 1890. 


Review of F. H. Waterhouse’s work of this title (8vo, London, 1889), with criticisms of 
omissions and defects, as the omission of all generic names founded before 1766, except 
Brisson’s, and the giving of vernacular French names the status of proper generic terms. 


9, Blanchard on the Nomenclature of Organized Beings.<Auk, VII, pp. 73-74, 


Jan., 1890. 

Review of Dr. Raphaél Blanchard’s report ‘De la Nomenclature des étres organizés,’ 
presented to the International Congress of Zodlogy (Reports to the Congress, pp. 87-157, 
July, 1889). Comment on some of the rulings in the report. 


1 With reference mainly to the general subject, and exclusive of special cases (Kerr, Oken, Pennant, 


etc.) and of incidental references in reviews and papers devoted chiefly to other subjects. 


202 


10. 


LL 


13; 


14. 


15. 


iG: 


17.3 


18. 


19; 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1896. 
Sclater on Rules for Naming Animals. <Awk, XIII, pp. 325-328, Oct., 1896. 


Review of a paper by Dr. P. L. Sclater entitled ““ Remarks on the Divergencies between 
the ‘Rules for Naming Animals’ of the German ZoGlogical Society and the Stricklandian 


Code of Nomenclature”’ (Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1896, pp. 306-319), with critical comment. 


on many of his positions on important points. 


A Question of Nomenclature. < Auk, XIII, pp. 191-192, April, 1896. 
In reply, by request, to an article of this title by H. C. Oberholser (ibid., pp. 190-191). 


A reprehensible method of determining Priority of Publication. <Science, N.S., 
IV, pp. 691-693, Nov. 16, 1896. 


A criticism of resolutions on this subject adopted by the ZoGlogical Section of the Ameri-- 


can Association for the Advancement of Science, August, 1895. 


The Date of Publication. <Science, IV, pp. 838, 839, Dec. 4, 1896. 


Further discussion of the subject, in reply to Professor Cope’s defense of the American 
Association resolution. (See supra, No. 12). 


1897. 
The Merton Rules. <Science, N.S., VI, pp. 16-19, July 2, 1897. 


Comment on the rules compiled by Lord Walsingham and John Hartley Durant, “‘for- 


regulating nomenclature with a view to secure a strict application of the Law of Priority in 
Entomological work.’’ 


1898. 


A Defense of Canon XL of the A. O. U. Code.<Auk, XV, pp. 298-302, Oct., 
1898. 


A reply to criticism by D. G. Elliot of Canon XL of the A. O. U. Code (ibid., pp. 294-298), 
in defense of taking names as originally spelled, and against the emendation of names. 


‘Truth versus Error.’<Auk, XVI, Jan., 1899, pp. 46-51. 


In reply to a second article, under this title, by D. G. Elliot (ibid., pp. 38-45), a rejoinder 


to the reply made to his first paper on the A. O. U. Canon XL. (See supra, No. 15.) 


1902. 


A Method of Fixing the type in Certain Genera. <Science, N. S., XVI, pp. 114, 
‘115, July 18, 1902. 
A rule proposed and signed by Allen, Bangs, Evermann, Gill, Howell, Jordan, C. H. 


Merriam, G. S. Miller, Jr., Mary Rathbun, Oldfield Thomas — a formal recognition of the 
principle of tautonymy. 


1903. 


Antedated Publications. <Science, N. 8., XVIII, pp. 631-632, Nov. 18, 1903. 
Relates to publications of the Field Columbian Museum of Chicago. 


1904. 
Code of Botanical Nomenclature.<Auk, XXI, pp. 404-405, July, 1904. 


Reviewed and compared with the A. O. U. Code and their general agreement noted 
(Bull. Torrey Botanical Club, XX XI, No. 5, May, 1904). 


20. 


21. 


22. 


23. 


24. 


20. 


26. 


27. 


28. 


NOMENCLATURE. 203: 


1905. 


A New Code of Nomenclature. <Science, N.8., X XI, pp. 428-433. 


Criticism of ‘A Provisional Code’ by Doctors Jordan, Evermann and Gilbert, published 
in The Condor, VII, pp. 28-30, Jan., 1905. 


1906. 


The ‘Elimination’ and ‘First Species’ Methods of Fixing the Types of Genera. 
<Science, N. 8., XXIV, pp. 773-779, Dec. 14, 1906. 
In reply to a paper by Witmer Stone on the same subject (Science, XXIV, pp. 560-565, 
Nov. 2, 1906). 
Subgenera and other Matters.<Awk, XXIII, pp. 122-125, Jan., 1906. 
Relates to the non-recognition of Brissonian genera by Hartert in his ‘Die Vege! der. 


gel 
palaarktischen Fauna. 


The Determination of Types of Genera — a Correction. <Science, N.S., XXIV, 
p. 858, Dec. 28, 1906. 


Respecting the type of Vultur Linn. 


1907. 


The First Species Rule for determining Types of Genera — How it works in 
Ornithology. <Science, N. 8., XXV, pp. 546-554, April 5, 1907. 


Fourth paper in the Stone-Allen discussion of the ‘First Species Question.’ 


Another Word on the V ultur Case. <Science, N.S., XXV, p. 827, May 24, 1907. 


Further discussion of the first species rule. 


Article 30 of the International Code of Zodlogical Nomenclature. <Science, 
N. S:, XXVI, pp. 719-723, Nov. 22, 1907. 


6 


In hearty approval of the “‘new Article 30,” and criticism of statements in a previous, 
article in Science by Witmer Stone. 


1908. 


Another Aspect of the Species Question.<Amer. Nat., XLII, pp. 592-600, 
Sept., 1908. 


With reference to a report of the symposium held by the Botanical Society of America 
in Chicago, Jan. 1, 1908, and published in the Amer. Nat. for April, 1908, pp. 217-281. 


1909. 


Genera without Species. <Science, N.S., XXIX, No. 754, pp. 934-936, June 11, 
1909. 


With reference to previous papers on this subject by Prof. T. D. A. Codckerell in the same 
volume of Science. The position is taken that such genera should each be treated on their 
merits, as against the proposed non-recognition of all such genera. 


Genera without Species. <Science, N.S., XXX, No. 768, pp. 365-367, Sept. 17, 
1909. 


A continuation of the discussion (supra, No. 25), with special reference to an article by 
Mr. A. N. Caudell. 


204 


30. 


dl. 


32. 


30. 


34, 


30. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Recommendations regarding the treatment of Genera without Species, etc. 
<Science, N. S., XXX, No. 744, pp. 596-597, Oct. 29, 1909. 


Covers two recommendations relating to genera without species, which are the outcome 
of the correspondence on this subject in Science, and directly with Prof. T. D. A. Cockerell. 


1910. 


The Determination of Genotypes in Zoélogy. Advance separate of a paper 
published in the Proceedings of the Seventh International Zodlogical Con- 
gress, Boston meeting, August 19-24, 1907 (8vo, pp..7; separates received 
Jan. 24, 1910.) 


Opinions rendered by the International Commission on Zodlogical Nomen- 
clature. <Science, N. 8., XXXII, No. 820, pp. 380-382, Sept. 10, 1910. 


Summary of Opinionsf 1-25, with comment. 


1912. 


Mathews’s Notes on Nomenclature.< Auk, XXIX, pp. 183-135, Jan., 1912. 


Rejoinder to Gregory M. Mathews’s paper of this title (Auk, l. c., pp. 131-133), with 
special reference to the genus Colymbus Linné (1758) and Colymbus Brisson (1760), and 
to other Brissonian genera. 


Suggested Amendments to the International Code of Zoélogical Nomenclature. 
Amendment Proposed by Dr. J. A. Allen. <Zool. Anz., XLI, pp. 38-45, Nov. 
26, 1912. 


Amendment to replace the ‘Recommendations’ following Art. 36, placing generic names 
on a basis similar to that of specific names under the Gratz (1910) amendment to Art. 35. 


1913. 


Propositions by J. A. Allen and T. D. A. Cockerell for Amendments to the 
International Code of Zodlogical Nomenclature. <Zool. Anz., XLI, pp. 426- 
427, March 11, 1913. 

Species designated by only a vernacular name may, under certain conditions, be accepted 
as genotypes. 


BIOGRAPHY. 205 


VII. BIOGRAPHY.! 


1880. 


1. Thomas Mayo Brewer.<Bull. Nutt. Ornith. Club, pp. 102-104, April, 1880; 
Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sciences, VII, pp. 378-380, 1879-80; Proc. 
Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XX, pp. 413-415. 


1884. 


= 


Wilson Flage.< Auk, I, p. 306, July, 1884. 
3. Henry George Vennor.<Avwk, I, p. 306, July, 1884. 
1885. 


William Wood. <Auk, II, p. 391, Oct., 1885. 
Harmon Albro Atkins. <Auwk, II, p. 391, Oct., 1885. 


ae 


1886. 


6. Samuel Cabot.<Auk, III, p. 144, Jan., 1886. 

7. Eugen von Boeck. <Auk, III, p. 496, Oct., 1886. 
1887. 

8. John Maynard Wheaton.<Auk, IV, p. 174, April, 1887. 

9. Spencer Fullerton Baird.<Auk, IV, pp. 358-359, Oct., 1887. 
1888. 


10. Joseph Bassett Holder.<Awuk, V, p. 220, April, 1888. 
11. Charles Linden.< Auk, V, April, pp. 220-221, 1888 
12. Philip Henry Gosse.<Auk, V, pp. 446-447, Oct., 1888. 


1889. 


13. Henry Stevenson.<Auk, VI, pp. 79-80, Jan., 1889. 
14. August Friedrich Marschall.<Awk, VI, p. 80, Jan., 1889. . 
15. Nicolas Michailovitch Prjevalsky.<Awuk, VI, pp. 80-81, Jan., 1889. 


1 The following biographical records relate almost exclusively to more or less prominent ornitholo- 
gists, and were nearly all published in The Auk (1884-1911, inclusive) as editorial notices, without 
signature. They include not only American ornithologists but all the foreign ornithologists of note 
who died between the above-given dates. The references given here, it should be noted, include only 
a part of the formal biographies and obituaries published in The Auk during the period named, since 
the biographers of all deceased fellows of the A. O. U. are appointed by the President; also those of a 
number of the deceased Members and Associates have been prepared at the solicitation of the editor 
of The Auk, and not by him personally; such notices, of course, are not here included. 


206 


16. 
ie 
18. 
19: 
‘20. 


20. 
22. 
23. 


24. 
25. 
26. 
27. 
28. 


29: 
30. 
ol. 


32. 
33. 
34. 
30. 
36. 
37. 


38. 
39. 
40. 
41. 
42. 


43. 
44. 
45. 
46. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


Thure Kumlien.< Auk, VI, pp. 204-205, April, 1889. w 
S. Lowell Elhott.<Auk, VI, p. 206, April, 1889. 

Richard Spaulding Wray.< Auk, VI, p. 206, April, 1889. 

Jerome Henry Kidder. <Auk, VI, p. 282, July, 1889. 

Eugen Ferdinand von Homeyer. <Auk, VI, p. 341, Oct., 1889. 


1890. 


Ladislas Taczanowski.< Auk, VII, p. 218, April, 1890. 
John Henry Gurney.<Awk, VII, pp. 299-300, July, 1890. 
William Kitchen Parker.<Auk, VII, pp. 411-412, Oct., 1890. 


1891. 


Ferdinand Krauss. <Auk, VIII, p. 120, Jan., 1891. 

Henry Davis Minot.<Avwuk, VIII, p. 121, Jan., 1891. 

Nathaniel Stickney Goss.<Awk, VIII, pp. 245-247, April, 1891. 
John C. Cahoon.<Auk, VIII, p. 320, July, 1891. 

John I. Northrop.<Auk, VIII, p. 400, Oct., 1891. 


1892. 


Hermann Burmeister.< Auk, IX, pp. 399-400, Oct., 1892. 
August von Pelzeln.< Auk, IX, pp. 74-75, Jan., 1892. 
John Amory Jeffries.< Auk, IX, pp. 311-312, July, 1892. 


1893. 


John Strong Newberry.<Auk, X, p. 95, Jan., 1893. 
Philo R. Hoy.< Auk, X, pp. 95-96, Jan., 1893. 

Jenness Richardson. < Auk, X, pp. 307-308, July, 1893. 
Austin F. Park.< Auk, X, pp. 384-385, Oct., 1893. 
Benjamin Franklin Goss.< Auk, X, p. 385, Oct., 1893. 
Charles F. Adams. <Auk, X, pp. 385-386, Oct., 1893. 


1894. 


Charles Glover Allen. < Auk, XI, pp. 86-87, Jan., 1894. 

Samuel Lockwood.<Auk, XI, pp. 189-190, April, 1894. 

William Cushman Avery.<Auk, XI, p. 263, July, 1894. 

Alexander Theodore von Middendorf.< Auk, XI, p. 264, July, 1894. 
Leopold von Schrenck. <Auk, XI, p. 264, July, 1894. 


1895. 


John Whipple Potter Jenks.< Auk, XII, p. 94, Jan., 1895. 
Edward Baldamus.<Auk, XII, p. 94, Jan., 1895. 
George Newbold Lawrence. <Auk, XII, pp. 198-199, April, 1895. 
Frederick H. Hoadley. <Awk, XII, p. 199, April, 1895. 


& 


47, 
48. 
49. 
-50. 


Ol. 
-O2. 

53. 

o4. 
55. 
56. 
57. 


58. 
59. 
60. 
GI. 
62. 
63. 
64. 


65. 
66. 


68. 
69. 


BIOGRAPHY. 207 


Edward Hargitt.<Auwk, XII, p. 315, July, 1895. 

John S. Cairns.< Auk, XII, p. 315, July, 1895. 
Franklin Fairbanks. < Auk, XII, p. 315, July, 1895. 
George Henry Ragsdale.<Awk, XII, p. 316, July, 1895. 


1896. 


Thomas Henry Huxley.< Auk, XIII, pp. 93-96, Jan., 1896. 

Henry Seebohm. <Auk, XIII, pp. 96-97, Jan., 1896. 

Henry T. Wharton. <Auk, XIII, p. 97, Jan., 1896. 

Juan Gundlach. <Auk, XIII, p. 267, July, 1896. 

Thomas Lyttleton (Lord Lilford).<Auk, XIII, pp. 348-349, Oct., 1896. 
Eugene Carleton Thurber. < Auk, p. 349, Oct., 1896. 

George Brown Goode. <Auk, XIII, p. 349, Oct., 1896. 


1897. 


Howard Gardner Nichols. << Auk, XIV, p. 115, Jan., 1897. 
Charles Emil Bendire. < Auk, XIV, p. 253, April, 1897. 
Heinrich Gatke. <Auk, XIV, p. 254, April, 1897. 

Platt Marvin Thorne. <Auk, XIV, pp. 254-255, April, 1897. 
Robert Lee Lawrence. < Auk, XIV, p. 342, July, 1897. 
Edward Drinker Cope. <Awk, XIV, pp. 242-243, July, 1897. 
Edward Newton. <Auk, XIV, p. 431, Oct., 1897. 


1898. 


George Baur. < Auk, XV, pp. 286-287, July, 1898. 
Osbert Salvin. <Auk, XV, pp. 343-346, Oct., 1898. 


1899. 


Oliver Marcy.<Auk, XVI, p. 211, April, 1899. 

Othniel Charles Marsh. <Auk, XVI, p. 211, April, 1899. 
Joseph Wolf.<Awk, XVI, pp. 301-302, July, 1899. 

John Cordeaux. < Auk, XVI, pp. 377-378, Oct., 1899. 


1900. 


Elliott Coues. <Awk, XVII, p. 91, Jan., 1900. . (See also below Nos. 72 and 122.) 
Elliott Coues. <Science, N.S., XI, pp. 161-163, Feb. 2, 1900. 

Daniel Webster Prentiss. < Auk, XVII, pp. 91-92, Jan., 1900. 

William W. Colburn. <Auk, XVII, p. 92, Jan., 1900. 

George B. Sennett.< Auk, XVII, p. 193, April, 1900. (See also below, No. 79.) 
William Edwin Brooks. <Auk, XVII, p. 194, April, 1900. 

Alphonse Milne-Edwards. < Auk, XVII, pp. 320-321, Oct., 1900. 

Edgar Leopold Layard.<Auk, XVII, pp. 321-322, Oct., 1900. 


208 


Uk 


80. 
81. 
82. 
83, 


84. 


85. 
86. 
87. 
88. 


89. 
90. 
on 
92. 


93. 
94. 
95. 
96. 
97. 


98. 
oo. 
100. 


101. 


102. 
103. 
104. 
105. 
106. 


ie 


BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1901. 


In Memoriam: George B. Sennett.<Auk, XVIII, pp. 11-23, Jan., 1901, with 
portrait. 
Gustav Hartlaub. <Auk, XVIII, p. 219, April, 1901. 
George Augustus Boardman. <Auk, XVIII, pp. 219-220, April, 1901. 
Edmond de Sélys Longschamps. <Auk, XVIII, pp. 292-293, July, 1901. 
William MacGillivray.<Auk, XVIII, pp. 2938-294, July, 1901. 
Apropos of the unveiling of a memorial tablet to him at Marischal College, Aberdeen, 
Scotland, in 1900. 


Newton Dexter.< Auk, XVIII, p. 413, Oct., 1901. 


1902. 


John Anderson. <Auk, XIX, p. 118, Jan., 1902. 
Armand David. < Auk, XIX, p. 118, Jan., 1902. 
Lionel William Wigglesworth. <Auk, XIX, p. 119, Jan., 1902. 
James Graham Cooper. <Auk, XIX, pp. 421-422, Oct., 1902. 


1903. 


Emil Holub. < Auk, XX, p. 92, Jan., 1903. 
Ludwig Kumlien. < Auk, XX, pp. 93-94, Jan., 1908. 
Perry O. Simons. < Auk, XX, pp. 94-96, Jan., 1903. 
John James Audubon. <Auk, XX, pp. 85-86, Jan., 1903. 
Review of John Burrough’s biography of Audubon (12mo, Boston, 1903).. 


Thomas MclIlwraith.< Auk, XX, p. 242, April, 1903. 

John Nathaniel Clark.<Auk, XX, pp. 242-248, April, 1903. 
Edward Stanley Waters. <Auk, XX, p. 243, April, 1903. 

Mrs. E. 8. Mogridge. <Auk, XX, pp. 327-328, July, 1903. 

Gustav Ferdinand von Radde. <Awk, XX, pp. 458-459, Oct., 19038.. 


1904. 


Lyman S. Foster. < Auk, XXI, p. 312, April, 1904. 
John Fannin.<Auk, XXI, p. 510, Oct., 1904. 
James Mortimer Southwick. < Auk, X XI, p. 511, Oct., 1904. 


1OOs A | 
7 
Adolph Boucard. < Auk, XXII, p. 333, July, 1905. 

1906. : 


Jean Louis Cabanis. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 247-485, April, 1906. 
Paul Leverkuhn. <Auk, XXIII, p. 247, April, 1906. 

Emile Oustalet. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 355-356, July, 1906. 
George F. Breninger. < Auk, XXIII, p. 356, July, 1906. 
LaRue Klingle Holmes. <Auk, XXIII, p. 356, July, 1906.. 


107. 
108. 
109. 
110. 


111. 
112. 
tS. 
114. 
115. 


kL: 
117. 
118. 
119. 
120. 
121. 


122. 


123. 
124. 


125. 


126. 
127. 
128: 


129. 
130. 


131. 


132. 
133. 


134, 


BIOGRAPHY. 209 


Joseph H. Batty.<Auk, XXIII, pp. 356-357, July, 1906. 
Frank J. Thompson. <Auk, XXIII, pp. 357-358, July, 1906. 
Henry Baker Tristram. <Auk, XXIII, p. 484, Oct., 1906. 
Victor Fatio.< Auk, XXIII, pp. 484-485, Oct., 1906. 


1907. 


William Thomas Blanford.< Auk, XXIV, p. 118, Jan., 1907. 

Walter Lawry Buller.< Auk, XXIV, p. 119, Jan., 1907. 

August Koch. <Auk, XXIV, pp. 238-239, April, 1907. 

Alfred Newton. <Auk, XXIV, pp. 365-366, July, 1907. 

Carl von Linné (Linnzeus as a Zodlogist).<Science, N.S8., XXV, pp. 953-961, 
June 21, 1907. Also Ann. New York Acad. Sct., XVIII, pp. 9-19, pll. ii, 
1908, portraits. 


An address given at the celebration of the Bicentenary of the birth of Linneus, in New 
York, May 23, 1907. 


1908. 


Howard Saunders.<Auk, XXV, pp. 103-104, Jan., 1908. 
Rudolph Blasius. <Auk, XXV, p. 248, April, 1908. 

Leslie Alexander Lee.<Auk, XXV, p. 340, July, 1908. 
Edward Augustus Samuels. < Auk, X XV, p. 341, July, 1908. 
J. V. Barboza du Bocage. < Auk, XXV, p. 498, Oct., 1908. 
Francis Huntington Snow. < Auk, XXV, p. 498, Oct., 1908. 


1909. 


Elliott Coues. (Biographical Memoir.) < National Acad. Sct., Biogr. Mem., 
VII, pp. 397-446, June, 1909. 


With portrait, and lists of his principal works and papers (pp. 426-446). 


_Charles K. Worthen. <Auk, X XVI, p. 332, July, 1909, cbid., XX VII, p. 112. 


William H. Brownson. < Auk, X XVI, p. 453, Oct., 1909. 


1910. 


Richard Bowdler Sharpe.<Auk, XXVII, pp. 124-129, Jan., 1910, with 
portrait. 

John Farwell Ferry. < Auk, XXVII, pp. 240-241, April, 1910. 

Henry Hillyer Giglioli.< Auk, XX VII, pp. 484-485, Oct., 1910. 

William Earl Dodge Scott.< Auk, X XVII, pp. 486-488, Oct., 1910. 


1911. 


Charles Otis Whitman. < Auk, XXVIII, p. 149, Jan., 1911. 
Manly Hardy.<Auk, XXVIII, pp. 149-150, Jan., 1911; zbid., p. 291, July, 
1911. 


George Ernest Shelley. < Auk, XXVIII, pp. 387-388, July, 1911. 
Carl Parrot.<Auk, XXVIII, p. 388, July, 1911. 
Adolf Bernhard Meyer. <Auk, XXVIII, p. 519, Oct., 1911. 

1916. 


Daniel Giraud Elliot. <Sctence, N. 8., No. 1101, pp. 159-162, Feb. 4, 1916. 


210 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


VIII. MISCELLANEOUS. 


1865-1884. 


1. Curatorial Reports on Mammals and Birds. < Ann. Reports of the Trustees of the 
Mus. Comp. Zoél., 1865-1884. 


1866. 


2. Notice of a Foray of a Colony of Formica sanguinea Latr. upon a Colony of a 
black species of Formica, for the purpose of making slaves of the latter. < 
Proc. Essex Inst., V, pp. 14-16, April, 1866. 


1870. 


3. The Flora of the Prairies. < Amer. Nat., [V, pp. 577-585, Dec., 1870. 


A running account of the more striking features, with particular mention of many species. 


4. Notes on the Geological Character of the Country between Chique-Chique, 
on the Rio de Sao Francisco, and Bahia, Brazil. < Hartt’s Geology and Physical 
Geography of Brazil, pp. 309-319. (8vo, Boston, 1870.) 


Also inedited geological and zodlogical notes, passim. 


5. Our Weeds. < Massachusetts Ploughman, July 23—Oct. 8, 1870. 

A series of six articles, published as follows: 

Number 1, Introductory, July 23, 1870; No. II, The Crowfoots (Ranunculacezz) and the 
Poppy Family (Papaveracee), July 30, 1870; No. III, The Cruciferze, Cistacez or Rock 
Roses, and the Hypericacee (St. Johnswort Family), Aug. 13, 1870; No. IV, The Pink 
Family (Caryophyllacez), the Purselanes (Portulacaceze), the Mallow Family (Malvacez), 
Aug. 27, 1870; No. V, The Pulse Family (Leguminosz), Sept. 24, 1870; No. VI, The Rose 
Family (Rosacez), Evening Primrose Family (Onagracez), Orpine or Stone Crop Family 
(Crasulaceze), Oct. 8, 1870. 


1874. 


6. Metamorphism produced by the burning of Lignite Beds in Dakota and Mon- 
tana Territories. <Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., XVI, 1873-1874, pp. 246- 
262, May, 1874. 


7. Notes on the Natural History of Montana and Dakota.<Proc. Boston Soc. 
Nat. Hist., XVII, 1874-1875, pp. 33-91, Nov., 1874. 


Report on the Plants, pp. 70-86 (pp. 40-56 of the separate issue). An annotated list of 
224 species, based mainly on identifications by Dr. George Vasey, Botanist of the Depart- 
ment of Agriculture, to whom the collection of plants was referred for determination. 


" | ean alia 


MISCELLANEOUS. 211 


1874-75. 


8. Boston Society of Natural History. Reports of Meetings. <Boston Transcript 


10. 


tt. 


12. 


(newspaper), Nov. 15, 1874, to June 8, 1875. 


Meeting of Oct. 7, 1874. Ibid., Nov. 15, 1874. 
Meeting of Oct. 21, 1874. Ibid., Nov. 21, 1874. 
Meeting of Nov. 4, 1874. Ibid., Nov. 27, 1874. 
Meeting of Nov. 18, 1874. JIbid., Dec. 2, 1874. 
Meeting of Dec. 2, 1874. Ibid., Dec. 17, 1874. 
Meeting of Dec. 16, 1874. Ibid., Dec. 30, 1874. 
Meeting of Jan. 6, 1875. Ibid., Jan. 25, 1875. 
Meeting of Jan. 20, 1875. Ibid., Feb. 1, 1875. 
Meeting of Feb. 3, 1875. Jbid., Feb. —, 1875. 
Meeting of Feb. 17, 1875. Ibid., March 1, 1875. 
Meeting of March 3, 1875. Ibid., March —, 1875. 
Meeting of March 17, 1875. Ibid., April —, 1875. 
Meeting of April 7, 1875. Ibid., April —, 1875. 
Meeting of April 21, 1875. Ibid., May —, 1875. 
Meeting of May 5, 1875. Ibid., May —, 1875. 

Meeting of May 19, 1875. Ibid., June 8, 1875. 

These popular reports of the meetings were furnished to the press by the author as a part 
of his duties as Acting Secretary of the Society. 


1876. 


The Little Missouri “ Bad Lands’’.< Amer. Nat., X, pp. 207-216, April, 1876. 


With reference to metamorphism due to the burning out of heavy beds of lignite. 


Nuttall Ornithological Club. <Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, I, pp. 29-32, July, 1876. 


Historical sketch of the Club (1873-1876), giving an account of its origin and organization 
and a list of its publications prior to the establishment of its Bulletin in 1876. 


1884. 


Italics for Scientific Names. <Science, III, No. 51, p. 87, Jan. 25, 1884. 


Refers to the advantage of using italic type for the technical names of genera and species, 
as an aid in finding the information sought. 


1885. 


Department of Birds and Mammals.<Ann. Rep. Trustees Amer. Mus. Nat. 
Hist. for the year 1885-6, pp. 9-12, March, 1886. 


Report on the extent and condition of the collections; need of ‘study’ or research material 
urged; also of increased exhibition space. 


1886. 


[Establishment of the Division of Economic Ornithology and Mammalogy 
under the United States Department of Agriculture.]<Auk, I, p. 416, July, 
1886, 


212 ' - BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


1887. 


14. Third Annual Report of the Curator of the Department of Mammalogy and 
Ornithology, 8vo, pp. 1-10. 


A brochure privately printed by order of the President. Reprinted in part in Ann. 
Report Trustees Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. for the year 1887-1888, pp. 12-16. 

To a report on the accessions and activities of the year 1887 is added: ‘Wants and Recom- 
mendations,’ and letters to the President of date Nov. 7, 1887 and Jan. 21, 1888, in advocacy, 
respectively, of the purchase of an important collection of North American birds, and of 
sending expeditions to the West to secure specimens of bison, elk, caribou, pronghorn ante- 


lope, mountain sheep, and other forms of rapidly disappearing large North American mam- , 
mals. : 


1888. 


15. The Museum of Natural History. An Appeal for Aid in Carrying on its Work. 
<New York Evening Post, Feb. 28, 1888. 


Of the $64,000 expended in 1877, all but $15,000 was furnished by the Trustees. The 
accessions received and the work accomplished by the Department of Mammalogy and 
Ornithology is recounted, and a plea made for financial assistance on the part of the public 
through aid by membership, etc., in return for free access to the exhibition halls of the Mu- 
seum. 


16. The Museum of Natural History.<New York Tribune, Feb. 24, 1888. 
Published as editorial, about 500 words. 


1890. 
17. Zoe, A Biological Journal. <Auk, VII, p. 300, July, 1890. 


Announcing the founding, objects and character of this excellent journal of which four 
volumes (1890-1893) were published. 


1895. 


18. The Natural History Museum of New York City.<New York Evening Post, 
Feb. 28, 1898. 


Its scientific work as set forth in the Bulletin of the Museum. 


19. Letter on alleged skinning of Kids and Birds while alive, to improve the quality 
of their Skins or Plumage for Commercial Purposes. <Our Animal Friends, 
XX, p. 268, No. 12, Aug., 1893. 


20. Letter in reply to the question ‘‘How does the Study of Nature Pay?” <The 
Hesperian (newspaper), Gainesville, Texas, March 31, 1898. oe 
Letter to Geo. H. Ragsdale. 


Bibliography: Summary of Titles. 


Mammals : é , eel 
Birds). F ‘ ‘ . 966 
Reptiles : P : : 5 
Zodgeography : S22 
Nomenclature ; : 0315) 
Biography ; é . 134 
Miscellaneous ; f 5 Aw) 


EDITORIAL WORK. Dili 


IX. EDITORIAL WORK. 


1874-1875. 


“The Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, Vol. XVIII, for 1874-1875, 
and part of Vol. IX of the American Naturalist, in the temporary absence 
of their respective editors. 


0 


1876-1883. 


Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, Vols. I-VIII, Cambridge, Mass. Pub- 
lished by the Club, 8vo, 1876-1883. 


The first number of this publication was issued in April, 1876, under the editorship of 
‘Mr. Charles J. Maynard, and under the title Quarterly Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological 
‘Club, Cambridge, Mass. With the second number (July, 1876) the title was changed to 
Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club: A Quarterly Journal of Ornithology, with, on the 
fourth page of the cover, a ‘Prospectus,’ which states: ‘‘The need in this country of a peri- 
odical exclusively devoted to Ornithology has been long apparent....Each number will 
consist of not less than twenty-four pages, to be increased as soon as the receipts from sub- 
scriptions shall warrant the additional expense. Two more numbers will be issued during 
the present year, in order that the second volume may begin with January, 1877... .Pro- 
fessor Baird and Dr. Coues have kindly consented to act as Associate Editors. Its chief 
editorial management will be under the direction of Mr. J. A. Allen of the Museum of Com- 
parative Zodlogy, Cambridge, Mass....’” No. 4 was issued November, 1876. Volume I 
consists of pp. i-iv, 1-100, with a colored plate, engraved on steel. 

The volumes, under the same editorial staff, steadily increased in size to Vol. VII, 1882 
(pp. i-vi, 1-275). Number 4 of Volume VIII (October, 1883) contained this ‘‘ Important 
Notice: The First Series of the Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club closes with the 
present volume. A Second Series, with change of name, will begin with January, 1884, 
under the auspices of the American Ornithologists’ Union, and under the Editorial Manage- 
ment of Mr. J. A. Allen, assisted by a Staff of Associate Editors... .”’ 

The Associate Editors of the eight volumes of the Bulletin were Spencer F. Baird and 
Elliott Coues. 


1884-1911. 


The Auk: A Quarterly Journal of Ornithology, Vols. I-X XVIII, 1884-1911, and No. 
1 of Vol. X XIX (Jan., 1912). 


Title-page of Vol. I: 


Old Series, Continuation of the New Series, 
Vol. IX Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club Vol. I 
The Auk | A Quarterly Journal of Ornithology| —| Editor, | J. A. Allen | Associate Editors, | 
Elliott Coues, Robert Ridgway, William Brewster, | and Montague Chamberlain. [Cut 
of Great Auk, 43 X 5 in.| Volume [| Published for the American Ornithologists’ Union | 
Boston, Mass. | Estes and Lauriat | 1884. 

The second page of the cover of the first number carries the following: ‘‘‘The Auk,’ 
published as the Organ of the American Ornithologists’ Union, will be conducted as a Maga- 
zine of General Ornithology. In general character it will differ little from the late ‘Bulletin 
of the Nuttall Ornithological Club,’ of which it forms virtually a Second Series. Each num- 
ber will contain about one hundred pages, and the illustrations will occasionally include colored 
plates.”’ 

The first volume of ‘The Auk’ consists of pp. i-vii, 1-419, and 1 colored plate. This is 
about the average size for the first 19 volumes, the last 7 averaging 500 pages, in each case. 


N\A BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


exclusive of front-matter (contents and membership lists), which runs, in different volumes,. 
from 8 to nearly 40 pages. 

In The Auk, as in its predecessor, the /Vuttall Bulletin, the department of ‘Recent Litera- 
ture’ was intended to include notices (1) of all ornithological works and papers by American 
authors; (2) all papers, wherever published, relating especially to North American birds; 
(3) all of the more important monographs and works treating of special groups of birds or of 
birds in general. In 1880 was begun a series of papers entitle “Minor Ornithological Papers,’ 
giving the title, place of publication, and short notices or abstracts of the minor papers 
relating to North American birds, not otherwise noticed under ‘Recent Literature,’ subject 
however to certain stated restrictions as to their content. The record began “‘ with the close 
of that given by Dr. Coues in his ‘List of Faunal Publications relating to North American 
Ornithology’ published in his ‘ Birds of the Colorado Valley,’ or about July, 1878,” and closed 
in 1894, after having been a feature of ‘The Auk’ for fourteen years. The last title of the 
series was No. 2697. Nos. 1-1199 were by the editor, the others (Nos. 1200-2697) by C. 
F. Batchelder, who from 1888 to 1893 (both inclusive) was Associate Editor of The Auk and 
greatly lightened for this period the duties of the senior editor. 

The Associate Editors of The Auk for the first four volumes (1884-1887) were Elliott 
Coues, Robert Ridgway, William Brewster, and Montague Chamberlain. ‘They were 
succeeded by Charles F. Batchelder (1888-1893) and Frank M. Chapman (1894-1915). 


“Beginning with the initial volume of the Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, and 
continuing to the present year, Dr. Allen has, without intermission guided the course of this 
journal and its successor THE AuK; and the series of thirty-six volumes stands as a perpetual 
monument to his ability, and his painstaking devotion to the cause of ornithology and the 
interests of the American Ornithologists’ Union. There have been few continuous editor- 
ships of equal length in the history of scientific periodicals.’’-— Editorial statement by 
Wirmer Stone, Auk, X XIX, p. 136, Jan., 1912. F 


1836. 


The Code of Nomenclature | and | Check-List | of | North American Birds |{ 
adopted by the American Ornithologists’ Union | being the Report of the 
Committee of the | Union on Classification and | Nomenclature — Zodlogi- 
cal Nomenclature is a means, not an end, of Zodlogical Science |— | New 
York | American Ornithologists’ Union | 1886. 8vo, pp. i-vui, 1-392. 


Contains The Code of Nomenclature (pp. 1-69) and The Check-List of North American 
Birds, according to the Canons of Nomenclature of the American Ornithologists’ Union 
(pp. 71-392). 


1886-1916. 


Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Vols. I, No. 6, to XXXV, 
excluding Vols. XV, XVII and XVIII, devoted to anthropology. (8vo, 
New York.) 


1889-1895. 


Supplement to the Code of Nomenclature and Check-List of North American 
Birds, adopted by the American Ornithologists’ Union. Prepared by a 
Committee of the Union. 8vo, pp. 23. New York, American Ornitholo- 
gists’ Union, 1889. 


Check-List | of | North American Birds | prepared by a Committee | of the | 
American Ornithologists’ Union | Second and revised edition | — | Zodlogical 
Nomenclature is a means, not an end, of Zodlogical Science |—|. New 
York | American Ornithologists’ Union | 1895. 8vo, pp. i-xi, 1-372. 


Supplements Nos. 2 to 15 to the Check-List were published at intervals in The Auk 
from 1890-1909, and also issued separately in an edition of 100 copies. 


EDITORIAL WORK. PAS) 


1893-1916. 


Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History. Vols. I and IX (Zodlogy 
and Paleontology), and general supervision of Vols. II, III, IV, and VI 
(Anthropology). Also, New Series, Vol. I, 1913-1916. 


1908 


The | Code of Nomenclature | adopted by the | American Ornithologists’ Union |— | 
Zoological Nomenclature is a means, not an end, of Zodlogical Science | — | 
Revised edition | New York | American Ornithologists’ Union| July, 1908. 
8vo, pp. 1-lxxxv. 


1910. 
Check-List | of | North American Birds | prepared by a Committee | of the | 
American Ornithologists’ Union | Third Edition (Revised) | — | Zodlogical 
Nomenclature is a means, not an end, of Zodlogical Science | — | New York | 


American Ornithologists’ Union | 1910. 8vo, pp. 1-430, 2 maps of North 
America, one of them colored to show faunal areas. 


Linon 


a 
Autobiogra raphic J ptt ‘dc biltiogeaal