Skip to main content

Full text of "Average biomass of four Northwest shrubs by fuel size class and crown cover"

See other formats


Historic, archived document 


Do not assume content reflects current 
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. 


United States 
| Department of 
; Agriculture 


Forest Service 


Pacific Northwest 
Forest and Range 
Experiment Station 
Research Note 
PNW-374 

March 1981 


Abstract 


Introduction 


Methods 


—_~.-WE1 se 


1 


a 


CORE Lig, 


‘Average Biomass of Four 


Northwest Shrubs by Fuel Size 
Class and Crown Cover 


Robert E. Martin, David W. Frewing, and 
James L. McClanahan 


a“ 


The average biomass of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata 
Nutt.), antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata (Pursh) DC.), 
snowbrush ceanothus (Ceanothus velutinus—Dougl. ex Hook.), and 
greenleaf manzanita (Arctostaphylos patula Greene) was 6.1, 
SielOay ys and l6.2tons per acre (13 °9),*Tl.3, 24.0; and 36.0 
tonnes per hectare (ha), respectively, for 100-percent shrub © 
crown coverage. Biomass by fuel size class and category is 
tabulated for percent crown cover. 


Keywords: Biomass, fuel loads, fire management, woody plants. 


Estimates or measurements of biomass and fuel loads for various 
forest and range situations are important to land managers. 
Comparisons of fuel loads and fire behavior are also important 
in the field of fire science. The data presented here were _ 
collected during several studies of /forest and range burning |to 
help estimate category and class of shrub fuel load. This ~ 
paper provides information on the average biomass and fuel 
content of four shrub complexes. The data will be expanded as 
studies continue. 


Data on shrub fuel loads of big sagebrush, antelope bitter- 
brush, snowbrush ceanothus and greenleaf manzanita were 
collected at several locations in Oregon,and-northern California_ 
east of the Cascade Range, specifically in the Pine Mountain, 
Kelsey Butte, and Pringle Falls areas of the Deschutes National 
Forest, the John Day River drainage of central Oregon, and Lava 
Beds National Monument in northern California. 


Robert E. Martin is a research forester and David W. Frewing 
and James L. McClanahan are forestry technicians at the Silvi- 
culture Laboratory, Bend, Oregon. 


Shrubs dissected for the study were selected by the following 
procedure. Each area in which shrubs were collected was 
sampled at fixed points along lines run through sample areas, 
the distance between points varying according to size of the 
research area. At each point, 65.6-foot (20-meter (m)) tran- 
sects were run at random angles. Along each transect, the 
second and eleventh shrubs whose crowns intersected the line 
were selected for sampling. The procedure varied in some cases 
because fuel complexes were quite varied; but choice of shrubs 
was systematic for each study. 


The procedure described would bias the sample toward larger 
shrubs because larger crowns are more likely to be intersected 
than smaller crowns. Most shrubs on any given area, however, 
tended to fall in a narrow size range, thus reducing the actual 
bias toward larger shrubs. 


Each shrub was described by species, number, and area and date 
of collection. Other data collected in the field for each 
shrub were: 


Average crown diameter (from largest and smallest diameter) 
Height (excluding flower stalks or occasional longer branches) 
Percent live crown surface 

Percent dead crown surface 

Age 


Shrubs were then cut at groundline and placed in bags for 
return to the laboratory. Only one-quarter of very large 
shrubs was removed. The quarter selected was determined 
randomly. 


In the laboratory, each shrub was separated into foliage and 
live and dead components by the following diameter size classes: 


Timelag fuel 


Inches Centimeters class, hours 
0-1/4 0-0.64 1 
1-3 Do A= 7] 6 O2 100 

3 = o62 1000 


For convenience, all size classes, both live and dead, were 
documented by timelag fuel classes, even though timelag classes 
are regularly used only for dead stems. We feel this is useful 
in calculating fuels after burning, when most shrubs have been 
killed by fire. The fuel components were then ovendried and 
weighed. 


Results 


Data were compiled and manipulated on a desk-top calculator. 
Because size range of shrubs was small and the conditions and 
shapes of shrubs varied widely, regressions of fuel content 
versus size, age, and other characteristics were not strong. 
This situation may be corrected by sampling over a wider range 
of the independent variables in the future. Total fuel load 
per acre or hectare was then calculated from the fuel component 
loads in the average shrub of each species multiplied by the 
ratio of area per acre or hectare/area of average shrub. 


Shrub characteristics for the four species should be representa- 
tive of average conditions over much of eastern Oregon and 
Washington and northern California without recent fire or other 
severe disturbance. Younger shrubs would have much smaller 
amounts of dead and large fuel than represented here. Small 
live fuels may make up crown cover percentages similar to those 
presented here, even though size of individual shrubs is quite 
different. 


Bitterbrush is lowest in average fuel load and greenleaf 
manzanita the highest (table 1). To use the table, select the 
percent crown cover of a shrub species and read vertically to 
obtain fuel load by size class and live or dead category. Size 
classes are summarized for each category and total fuel load 
indicated. Table 2 can be used for size and percent live crown 
for shrubs near the sizes indicated. 


The data in the table will be applicable to many areas in 
Oregon, Washington and northern California east of the Cascade 
Range. Because the data presented are averages, they must be 
applied with caution. We feel, however, that for 90 percent of 
the situations where no recent serious disturbance has occurred 
actual fuel loads will be between 50 and 200 percent of the 
indicated load. With the present state of predicting fire 
behavior, estimating fuel load from the table will probably be 
more accurate than other methods of prediction. 


Shrub crown cover percent can be estimated or measured on an 
area of selected sample points by running transects from the 
points. By adding the distances the transect runs over shrub 
crowns and figuring these as a fraction of total transect 

length, the percent shrub crown cover can be calculated from: 


_ shrub cover length = 1100. 


Shrub crown cover percent = total transect length 


tes 


Table 1--Average shrub fuel loads for live (L) and dead (D) categories by percent crown cover 


Percent cover 


Shrub 
timelag class 


100 


90 


80 


70 


60 


50 


40 


30 


20 


10 


Tons per acre (tonnes per hectare) 


SNOWBRUSH CEANOTHUS 


Ho Q(A.0)) — 2oi(458)) QoS) 2oO(Ga3!)) SoS(7oil)) — Bak 7/9)) 


5 (rely) 


-6(1.6) 


4 (.9) 


Live total 


1.0(2.4) 


Dead total 
Grand total 


10D 
10 D 
100 D 
1000 D 


GREENLEAF MANZANITA 


6.7(14.7) 


Foliage 
i {lt 
HOMIE 
100 L 
1000 L 


Tix \GGi2) 


NoAa2)) - 252550)  2e(G.6)) SaH(Bo2) 4 AM(@.) Ha kU) B.9(130)) 


y/A(@estG)) 


Live total 


1D 
10 D 
100 D 
1000 D 


NSM) oes) Salas) — MoBIOO)) Sas) Goss Vols) BOC) BOC.) 


“(2 500)) 


Dead total 


OI M(ls'd)) Wo 3a2) WSOC) lel A 255)) Gs AS.5(0)) 


AG) (GLO 9)) eer) (Cl 4515)) eee Clare) 


Aan) 


PEEK (sh (69) 


Grand total 


Table 1--Average shrub fuel loads for live (L) and dead (D) categories by percent crown cover (continued) 


Percent cover 


Shrub 
timelag class 


100 


90 


80 


70 


60 


50 


40 


30 


20 


10 


Tons per acre (tonnes per hectare) 


BIG SAGEBRUSH 


nT (eo)! dedl2ea)) alea(ace) de 7(Al0) © 3214.5). 223558) s2oB(Gee)”  Se2(6.9)0) a. A7 37) 


-4 (.8) 


Live total 


1 D 
10 D 


100 D 


1000 D 


eo Lste)) O20) a O(2.5)" “IealS.2)> Sa b(Sak)) senO(Aesn 72.5429!) 2.5(5.6) . Aad. (652) 


= 0 
oJ (<5) 


Dead total 


Le9(4.3) —_ ZEST) e072) a saree) An s(Oly7). SLT)  S.7( 12.5)" s6s2(13.9)) 


see 2!) 


Grand total 


BITTERBRUSH 


ee 


AwWmNe 


Foliage 
‘ag 
1O7E 
100 L 


1000 L 


SU) SoC) O20) “ak2(2.3) ede (257) Va SEO) ees) 


~4(1.0) 


Live total 


ep 


10 D 


100 D 


1000 D 


Lee) alee) (See); SRB (Sed) a eek (Ge). seceo(Sat) 2.96 a eealwes) 36) (8,0) 


£4: (28) 
OGL als 


Dead total 


Lea 3e4)P 2.04.5) © 25 A528) Sul(ibee) eae A(Ge0)) = 451 (9S) ese. 7 (1053), 5.0(T1 8) 


O22 2) 


Grand total 


Summary 


Literature Cited 


Table 2--Average and standard deviation for size and percent live crown of 
shrubs sampled 


Species and Standard Standard Standard 
measurements Mean deviation Mean deviation Mean deviation 
--Centimeters--— -—---- Inches—---- —-Percent live- 
Big sagebrush 60.1 Cite 
Crown diam. 74.8 30.8 30.0 12.3) 
Crown ht. 60.3 30.6 24.1 1252 
Antelope bitterbrush i 47.3 37.0 
Crown diam. 64.5 330 7/ 25.8 1355 
Crown ht. 40.6 20./7 16.3 8.3 
Snowbrush ceanothus 51.6 28.8 
Crown diam. 129.0 71.8 51.6 28.7 
Crown ht. 72.9 47.1 29.2 18.8 
Greenleaf manzanita 57S 28.3 
Crown diam. 208.0 123.0 83.2 49.2 
Crown ht. 97.0 49.0 38.8 19.6 


Once the field person has measured several transects, he or she 
may become skilled enough in estimating percent shrub crown 
cover to require only occasional checks. The tables may also 
be used in conjunction with the natural fuel photo series such 
as Maxwell and Ward (1980) to obtain shrub crown cover and use 
this in the tables. 


We have presented average biomass loads by percent of shrub 
crown cover for four northwest shrubs. These data can serve as 
an interim tool to estimate fuel loads by size class and 
category until more exacting data are compiled and analyzed. 
Current data provide a first estimate of shrub fuel loads for 
this area. 


Maxwell, Wayne G., and Franklin R. Ward. 
1980. Photo series for quantifying natural forest residues 
and common vegetation types of the Pacific Northwest. Gen. 
Tech. Rep. PNW-105, 230 p. Pac. Northwest For. and Range 
Exp. Stn., Portland, Oreg. 


The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple 
use management of the Nation’s forest resources 
for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, 
and recreation. Through forestry research, 
cooperation with the States and private forest 
owners, and management of the National Forests 
and National Grasslands, it strives — as directed by 
Congress — to provide increasingly greater service 
to a growing Nation. 


The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal 
Opportunity Employer. Applicants for all Department 
programs will be given equal consideration without 
regard to age, race, color, sex, religion, or national 
Origin. 


GPO 992-750