Skip to main content

Full text of "The mechanism of the protrusion of the tongue of the anura [electronic resource] : preliminary note"

See other formats


From  the  A.nnai<s  and  Maoazink  of  Natural  History, 
Ser.  7,  Vol.  vii.,  June  1901. 


77ie  Mechanism  of  the  Protrusion  of  the  Tongue  of  the  Anura. 
— Preliminary  Note.  By  Prof.  Marcus  Hartog3  M.A., 
D.Sc,  F.L.S .* 

For  an  explanation  of  the  mechanism  whereby  the  Anurous 
Batrachia  protrude  and  reverse  their  tongue  one  may  seek  in 

*  Translated  by  the  Author  and  slightly  modified.  From  the  '  Oomptea 
Rendu*  de  l'AcadSmie  des  Sciences,'  March  4,  1901. 


502       On  the  Protrusion  of  the  Tongue  of  the  Anura. 


vain  in  general  textbooks  of  zoology  and  in  special  mono- 
graphs. Almost  all  authors  have  been  content  to  repeat 
after  Fixsen  that  the  genioglossus  muscles  are  the  "  pro- 
tractors "  and  the  liyoglossus  muscles  the  "  retractors,"  though 
the  frog  has  served  as  the  object  for  the  initiation  of  the 
student  into  the  problems  of  anatomy  and  physiology  for  over 
forty  years.  As  my  own  annual  course  begins  with  the  study 
of  the  frog,  this  gap  in  our  knowledge  had  long  preoccupied 
me.  A  very  simple  experiment  has  sufficed  to  till  this  gap 
and  to  demonstrate  how  the  frog  throws  forth  its  tongue  and 
turns  it  through  an  angle  of  180°. 

If  we  expose  the  tongue  by  removing  the  upper  jaw  and 
front  of  the  skull  (cutting  straight  across  behind  the  eyes 
with  a  pair  of  stout  scissors),  remove  the  skin  of  the  lower 
jaw,  and  then  inject  air  or  -liquid  through  a  small  hole  in  the 
mylohyoid  (mandibular)  muscle,  the  tongue  rises  up  and 
springs  forward,  especially  if,  at  the  same  time,  we  draw 
forward  the  hyoid  bone.  Again,  if  we  inject  with  melted 
cocoa-butter  coloured  with  carmine  or  alkanet,  and  keep  up  the 
pressure  till  the  mass  sets,  we  find  that  it  fills  an  enormous 
lymph-sac  between  the  muscle  and  the  body  of  the  hyoid, 
extending  .through  a  median  intermuscular  fissure  into  the 
tongue  itself,  sending  branches  between  the  fan-shaped  rami- 
fication of  the  intrinsic  muscles  at  the  edges  of  the  tongue 
and  into  its  terminal  dilatations. 

The  whole  mechanism  is  now  obvious.  The  petrohyoids 
raise  the  hyoid  bone  and  commence  its  protraction,  an  action 
continued  by  the  geniohyoids.  The  genioglossi  and  hyoglossi 
may  co-operate  to  some  extent  at  first,  shortening  the  tongue, 
and  so  expanding  its  cavity  ;  but  it  is  the  mylohyoid  which 
by  its  contraction  expels  the  lymph  of  the  subhyoid  space 
into  the  tongue,  and  is  the  true  "  protrusor  lingua?  "  muscle. 
In  retraction  the  intrinsic  muscles  pull  the  tip  of  the  tongue 
backwards,  and  the  median  portion  of  the  genioglossi  espe- 
cially pull  its  base  downwards  and  inwards.  The  sterno- 
hyoids and  omohyoids  retract  the  body  of  the  hyoid  bone, 
with  its  attachments  to  the  tongue,  and  the  closure  of  the 
mouth  by  the  levators  of  the  mandible  presses  the  tongue 
against  the  roof  of  the  mouth,  and  so  expels  the  lymph  from 
its  cavity.  Clearly  this  sudden  propulsion  of  the  tongue  of 
the  Anura  is  an  erection,  and  is  thus  comparable  with  the 
sluggish  protrusion  of  the  foot  in  Lamellibranchs,  also  too  often 
miscalled  a  "  protraction." 

Silvestro  Baglioni,  in  his  recent  remarkable  solution  ot  the 
problem  of  the  respiration  of  the  frog  *,  hitherto  misunderstood, 
*  In  Arch.  f.  Anat.  u.  Physiol.,  Physiol.  Abth.  1900,Suppl.  Bd.  p.  3(3. 


On  the  Protrusion  of  the  Tongue  of  the  Anura.  503 


has  noted  that  during  the  contraction  of  the  mylohyoid  the 
tongue  "  wird  nach  vorn  und  oben  gezogen."  For  the  further 
development  of  this  movement  into  the  protrusion  of  the 
tongue  all  that  is  required  is  the  further  simultaneous  advance 
of  the  hyoid  bone  and  a  more  complete  contraction  of  the 
mylohyoid  muscle. 

I  propose  completing  this  study  with  a  detailed  account  of 
the  dissection  of  the  structures  involved,  for  which  I  am 
awaiting  the  supply  of  larger  objects  than  the  common  grass- 
frog,  which  is  alone  at  my  disposal  at  Cork.