Skip to main content

Full text of "The biological basis of individuality"

See other formats


Marine    Biological    Laboratory 


Rece,ved_i^^J_„ 


Accession    No. 


58251 


r.       D     Dr.    Leo  Loeb 

Liiven    oy 

Place         Washington  University 


I) 


^^" 

=  ru 

=  3- 

—  -=T 

=  tr 

Os 

—  i-q 

x== 

=  i-q 

zM 

-8  CO 

> — 

=  CD 

m— 

2== 

—  i-q 

=i  D 

sb  m 

=  D 

=  ° 

THE 

BIOLOGICAL  BASIS 
OF 

INDIVIDUALITY 


THE 


BIOLOGICAL    BASIS 

OF 

INDIVIDUALITY 


By 
LEO    LOEB 

Professor  Emeritus  of  Pathology 

Washington  University 

School  of  Medicine 

Saint  Louis 


1945 

CHARLES   C    THOMAS     •     PUBLISHER 

SPRINGFIELD       •       ILLINOIS  BALTIMORE       •       MARYLAND 


Published  by  Charles  C  Thomas 

at  Bannerstone  House 

301-327  East  Lawrence  Avenue,  Springfield,  Illinois 

Published  simultaneously  in  Canada  by 
The  Ryerson  Press,  Toronto 

All  rights  in  this  book  are  reserved.  No  part  may  be  re- 
produced in  any  form  whatsoever  without  permission  in 
writing  from  the  publisher,  except  by  a  reviewer  who 
wishes  to  quote  extremely  brief  passages  in  connection 
with  a  critical  review.  Reproduction  in  whole  or  in  part 
in  digests,  in  condensations  of  the  literature,  in  lectures, 
or  in  films;  or  by  multigraphing,  lithoprinting,  or  by  any 
other  processes  or  devices,  is  reserved  by  the  publisher. 
For  information,  address  Charles  C  Thomas. 

Copyright,  1945,  by  Charles  C  Thomas 

First  Edition 


Printed  in  the  United  States  of  America 


To  My  Wife 
Georgiana  Sands  Loeb 


Preface 

The  study  of  individuality  began  when  human  beings  observed  others, 
noted  their  structure  and  functions,  their  attitudes  and  actions.  At  a 
later  stage  the  physiologist  and  psychologist  recognized  that  in  the 
individualities  separate  constituents  can  be  distinguished  and  they  extended 
the  concept  of  individuality  to  other  organisms  than  man.  In  this  book  the 
attempt  has  been  made  to  distinguish  between  two  types  of  individuality: 

The  first  one  is  the  mosaic  type  which  represents  the  sum  of  the  par- 
ticular organ  and  tissue  characteristics  (organ  and  tissue  differentials) 
which  determine  structure,  metabolism,  motor  and  psychical  activities  and 
the  component  parts  of  which  differ  in  different  individuals.  These  multiple 
characteristics  are  combined  into  a  composite  or  mosaic  which  is  peculiar  to 
each  individual. 

The  second  type  of  individuality  which  may  be  designated  as  the  essential 
individuality  is  characterized  by  the  presence  of  a  chemical  factor — the 
individuality  differential — which  is  common  to  the  different  organs  and 
tissues  of  each  individual  and  which  differs  from  the  corresponding  chemi- 
cal characteristics  of  the  organs  and  tissues  of  every  other  individual.  This 
concept  emphasizes  the  oneness  of  the  individual  which  depends  upon  the 
presence  of  a  common  and  unique  factor  in  all  of  his  essential  parts. 

In  the  same  sense  in  which  individuality  differentials  characterize  individ- 
uals, there  are  species,  order  and  class  differentials  each  possessing  a  specific 
chemical  constitution  which  characterizes  the  larger  groups  of  organisms.  All 
these  various  differentials  may  be  grouped  together  as  organismal  differentials 
in  contrast  to  the  organ  and  tissue  differentials  which,  as  mentioned,  constitute 
the  mosaic  individuality.  While  it  is  thus  possible  to  distinguish  sharply  be- 
tween these  two  types  of  differentials  and  between  the  corresponding  defini- 
tions of  individuality,  various  kinds  of  interactions  take  place  between  the 
organismal  and  organ  differentials  and  these  interactions  are  required  to  make 
of  the  individual  an  integrated  whole. 

In  the  following  chapters  these  various  aspects  of  individuality,  including 
the  psychical,  are  analyzed,  but  only  as  far  as  the  principles  underlying  these 
phenomena  are  concerned  and  no  attempt  has  been  made  to  present  a  detailed 
or  complete  account  of  all  the  data  which  may  have  a  bearing  on  the  problems 
involved. 

The  starting  point  of  this  analysis  was  a  series  of  investigations  on  the 
transplantation  of  normal  and  of  tumor  tissues  which  the  author  and  his  col- 
laborators have  carried  out  in  the  course  of  about  forty-eight  years,  some  of 
which,  especially  those  dealing  with  inbred  strains  of  mice,  have  not  yet  been 
published.  To  make  possible  a  unified  account  and  interpretation  of  the  various 
aspects  of  individuality,  it  was  necessary  for  one  person  to  undertake  this 
work,  rather  than  to  edit  a  collective  book  written  by  specialists  in  the  different 

vii 


viii  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

sciences  which  contribute  the  data  needed  for  this  purpose.  The  method  thus 
chosen  suffers  from  the  difficulty  that  a  single  author  may  not  be  able  to  treat 
with  equal  competence  all  the  problems  involved;  but  it  is  believed  that  the 
unified  presentation  of  these  fields  may,  to  a  certain  extent,  compensate  for 
such  a  deficiency. 

In  the  following  chapters  these  types  of  individuality  are  analyzed  as  to 
their  evolution  and  their  biological  and  psychical  manifestations. 

It  is  hoped  that  this  presentation  may  be  of  interest  to  the  biologist  and  to 
the  general  pathologist  and  that  certain  parts  of  it  may  be  helpful  even  to  the 
surgeon  in  the  practice  of  tissue  grafting,  to  the  geneticist,  to  the  student  of 
cancer  and  to  the  immunologist ;  perhaps  also  to  the  psychologist  and  to  some 
philosophers. 


Acknowledgments 

This  book  was  written  in  a  provisional  form  in  1930  and  in  the  follow- 
ing years;  however,  it  was  not  yet  quite  finished  by  1937.  In  1937  a 
grant  was  received  from  the  Josiah  Macy  Jr.  Foundation  for  its  com- 
pletion ;  this,  as  well  as  a  revision,  was  accomplished  between  the  latter  date 
and  the  present  time.  The  writer  wishes  to  express  his  appreciation  to  the 
Josiah  Macy  Jr.  Foundation  for  the  assistance  thus  given. 

To  the  International  Cancer  Foundation  the  author  is  indebted  for  grants 
which  enabled  him  to  undertake  additional  experiments  concerning  a  com- 
parison between  the  individuality  differentials  of  normal  and  cancerous  tissues. 
In  this  volume  the  results  obtained  have  been  incorporated. 

Sincere  appreciation  is  also  due  to  the  numerous  collaborators  who  helped 
to  advance  this  field  of  research  during  the  many  years  in  which  these  in- 
vestigations were  carried  out.  Reference  is  made  in  the  text  to  their  contribu- 
tions. The  co-operation  of  Dr.  Helen  Dean  King  and  Dr.  Sewall  Wright  and 
subsequently  also  of  others  was  of  very  great  help  in  making  possible  the 
transplantation  of  tissues  in  closely  inbred  strains  of  rats  and  guinea  pigs. 
Later,  there  were  added  to  these  experiments  those  on  closely  inbred  strains 
of  mice  which  were  received  from  the  New  York  State  Institute  for  the  Study 
of  Malignant  Disease,  from  the  Roscoe  B.  Jackson  Laboratory,  Bar  Harbor, 
and  from  other  laboratories. 

The  aid  given  by  the  wife  of  the  author,  Georgiana  Sands  Loeb,  in  the  re- 
vision of  this  manuscript,  and  in  other  ways  through  many  years,  was  of  the 
greatest  value  and  to  her  this  book  is  gratefully  dedicated. 

To  Mr.  Charles  C  Thomas,  I  wish  to  express  my  warm  appreciation  of  the 
great  interest  and  helpfulness  he  has  manifested  in  the  publication  of  this  book. 


IX 


Table  of  Contents 

Preface vii 

Acknowledgments ix 

Introduction 3 

PART   I.    Transplantation   of   Tissues  in   Higher   Vertebrates,  as  a 

Method  for  the  Analysis  of  the  Organisnial  Differentials     .      .       27 

Chapter  1.  General  considerations 27 

Chapter  2.  Autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantations    ...       37 
Chapter  3.  Transplantation  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  tissues 

in  mice 54 

Chapter  4.  Autogenous,  syngenesious,  homoiogenous  and  interracial 

transplantations  in  birds 59 

Chapter  5.  The  mechanism  of  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous  in- 
dividuality differentials;  autogenous  tissue  regulators     ...       66 
Chapter  6.  Syngenesiotransplantation,.transplantation  in  closely  inbred 

strains,  and  the  individuality  differentials  of  near  relatives  .  .  72 
Chapter  7.  The  individuality  differentials  of  closely  inbred  animals  .  83 
Chapter  8.  Individuality  differentials  in  closely  inbred  guinea  pigs  .  89 
Chapter  9.  Individuality  differentials  in  closely  inbred  strains  of  mice  .  98 
Chapter  10.  Heterogenous  transplantation  of  normal  tissues  and  of 

blood  clots 116 

Chapter  11.  Exchange  of  tissues  between  different  varieties  or  races 

(subspecies) 131 

Chapter  12.  The  problems  and  the  criteria  of  success  or  failure  in 

transplantation  of  tissues  and  organs 136 

Chapter  13.  The  effects  of  various  extraneous  factors  on  the  activity 

of  the  organismal  differentials 140 

Chapter  14.  Hormones  and  individuality  differentials 143 

Chapter  15.  Individuality  differentials  and  blood  groups    ....      150 
Chapter  16.  The  relations  between  processes  of  immunity  and  indi- 
viduality differentials  in  transplantation 157 

Chapter  17.  The  significance  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  trans- 
plantation by  means  of  blood  vessel  anastomosis  and  in  parabiotic 

states 166 

Chapter  18.  Modification  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  strange 
individuality  differentials  by  transplantation  of  tissues  into  the 
allantois  of  chick  embryos,  into  the  brain  or  into  the  anterior 

chamber  of  the  eye 177 

Chapter  19.  The  relations  between  age  and  individuality  differentials  .      184 
Chapter  20.  Individuality  differentials  and  tissue  culture    ....     187 


xii  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Chapter  21.  The  individuality  differentials  and  potential  immortality 

of  tissues 190 

Chapter  22.  The  nature  of  the  individuality  differential  and  of  the 
reaction  of  an  organism  against  a  strange  individuality  differen- 
tial     195 

PART  II.  The  Phylo genetic  and  Ontogenetic  Development  of  Individu- 
ality and  Organismal  Differentials 203 

Chapter  1.  Transplantation  and  individuality  in  coelenterates  and  pla- 

narians 203 

Chapter  2.  Transplantation  and  individuality  in  higher  invertebrates 

and  in  amphibia 218 

Chapter  3.  Transplantation  and  individuality  of  embryonal  tissues     .     234 

Chapter  4.  The  significance  of  organismal  differentials  in  the  trans- 
plantation of  pieces  of  embryonal  tissue  into  embryos  and  into 
adult  organisms 244 

Chapter  5.  Organizers  and  tissue  differentiation,  and  their  relation  to 

organismal  differentials 259 

Chapter  6.  Regeneration,  transplantation  and  the  autogenous  tissue 

equilibrium 275 

PART  III.  The  Significance  of  Organismal  Differentials  in  the  Inter- 
action between  Single  Cells 287 

Chapter  1.  The  role  of  organismal  differentials  in  the  union  of  free- 
living  cells 287 

Chapter  2.  Tissue  formation  and  organismal  differentials  ....  298 

Chapter  3.  The  role  of  organismal  differentials  in  fertilization     .      .  307 

Chapter  4.  Self  fertilization  and  autogenous  transplantation    .      .      .  315 

Chapter  5.  The  relations  between  hybridization  and  transplantation    .  326 

PART  IV.  Tumors  and  Organismal  Differentials 333 

Introduction.  The  nature  of  tumors 333 

Chapter  1.  A  comparison  between  the  transplantation  of  tumors  and 

of  normal  tissues 338 

Chapter  2.  Heredity  and  transplantation  of  tumors 363 

Chapter  3.  The  relation  between  growth  energy,  adaptive  processes 

and  organismal  differentials  in  the  transplantation  of  tumors    .  384 
Chapter  4.  Immunity  and  organismal  differentials  in  tumor  transplan- 
tation       400 

Chapter  5.  Tumor  growth  and  organismal  differentials 432 

PART  V.  Organismal  and  Organ  Differentials  and  the  Specificity  of 

Tissue  Reactions 443 

Chapter  1.  The  relative  importance  of  substratum  and  of  morpho- 
genic  substances  in  the  specificity  of  tissue  reactions,  and  the  rela- 
tion of  these  factors  to  organismal  differentials 443 


CONTENTS  xiii 

Chapter  2.  Structure  and  function  of  organs  and  tissues  as  criteria  of 

individuality •     457 

Chapter  3.  Organismal  differentials  and  specific  adaptation  of  tissues 

and  their  products 466 

PART  VI.  Organismal  Differentials  and  Organ  Differentials  as  Anti- 
gens        477 

Introductory  remarks 477 

Chapter    1.   Blood  groups,   heterogenetic    (Forssman)    antigens   and 

organismal  differentials 478 

Chapter  2.  The  demonstration  of  species  differentials  by  serological 

methods 498 

Chapter  3.  The  demonstration  of  individuality  differentials  by  sero- 
logical methods 510 

Chapter  4.  The  organismal  differentials  of  hybrids  between  nearly  re- 
lated species 519 

Chapter  5.  On  the  differences  between  the  reactions  of  foetal  or  new- 
born organisms  and  of  adult  organisms  against  strange  differen- 
tials as  established  by  serological  methods 524 

Chapter  6.  Organ  (tissue)  differentials  and  their  analysis  by  serological 

methods , 530 

Chapter  7.  Idiosyncrasy  and  anaphylaxis  and  their  relation  to  organ- 
ismal  differentials 550 

Chapter  8.  Toxins  and  organismal  differentials 559 

Chapter  9.  The  chemical  nature  of  organismal  differentials     .      .      .     565 

Chapter  10.  Is  it  possible  by  experimental  means  to  change  organismal 

differentials? 580 

PART  VII.  Organismal  Differentials,  Organ  Differentials  and  Evo- 
lution      589 

PART  VIII.  The  Psychical-social  Individuality 609 

Chapter  1.  The  physiological  basis  of  the  psychical-social  individuality  609 

Chapter  2.  Individuality  and  world 627 

Chapter  3.  The  evolution  of  individuality 649 

Bibliography 659 

Index 697 


THE 

BIOLOGICAL  BASIS 
OF 

INDIVIDUALITY 


Introduction 

We  apply  the  term  "individual"  to  a  human  being  to  emphasize  the 
distinctive  unique  features  which  such  a  person  possesses.  We  note 
his  appearance,  motor  reactions,  the  expression  of  his  face  and  his 
psychical  states,  especially  those  which  have  a  social  significance.  By  this 
designation  we  accentuate,  in  general,  our  impression  that  the  different  persons 
we  meet  are  more  or  less  distinct  from  one  another,  although  there  may  be 
variations  in  the  degree  of  these  differences.  Some  persons  appear  to  be  more 
like  others,  while  other  persons  show  marked  peculiarities  which  differentiate 
them  sharply  from  the  rest.  Attention  is  given  especially  to  the  modes  of 
thinking,  feeling,  to  the  emotions,  imagination,  creativeness,  to  the  behavior 
in  certain  social  constellations. 

We  apply  the  term  "personality"  to  a  human  being,  to  state  our  reactions  to 
him  in  social  intercourse,  and  our  opinion  as  to  whether  we  find  him  forceful 
or  weak,  pleasant  or  unpleasant,  serious  or  light. 

Individuality  is  here  used  as  the  general  term,  while  by  personality  is  under- 
stood that  part  of  human  individuality  which  manifests  and  maintains  itself  in 
the  social  intercourse  and  struggle.  We  rnay  define  this  distinction  also  some- 
what differently.  Individuality  may  be  conceived  of  as  the  original  physical 
and  psychical  state  of  an  organism,  which  has  developed  in  accordance  with 
the  genetic  constitution  of  this  organism  with  the  co-operation  of  a  sequence 
of  more  or  less  fixed  physical-chemical  environmental  conditions.  In  the  course 
of  the  natural  and  social  struggle  in  which  a  human  being  is  involved,  tradi- 
tions, suggestions,  experiences  of  many  kinds,  mold  this  individuality  in 
various  directions  and  thus  determine  the  characteristics  which  the  individual 
takes  on  in  becoming  converted  into  the  personality  which  develops  in  the 
course  of  time  and  which  alone  we  know.  In  this  sense  we  are  acquainted  not 
with  individualities  but  only  with  personalities.  The  basic  individuality  is, 
then,  a  mere  mental  construction,  which  we  cannot  know  but  some  properties 
of  which  we  can  surmise.  However,  secondarily,  it  is  customary  to  express  the 
distinctive  features  or  characteristics  of  a  certain  person,  which  differentiate 
him  from  other  persons,  as  his  individual  characteristics. 

These  are  not  sharply  defined  terms.  Like  all  other  beginnings  of  scientific 
analysis,  they  express  not  yet  fully  correlated  and  analyzed  experiences ;  they 
represent  crude  approximations  to  the  understanding  of  reality. 

The  term  "individual"  is  extended  from  man  to  other  living  organisms 
which  also  show  distinctive  features,  and  it  is  applied  even  to  non-living 
things.  In  a  literal  sense,  it  signifies  that  an  organism  or  a  thing  is  an  integrated 
whole,  which  cannot  be  further  divided  without  ceasing  to  be  this  particular 
organism  or  thing,  without  losing  its  identity.  Among  the  more  primitive  or- 
ganisms it  may  be  difficult  to  distinguish  from  one  another  individuals  in  a 
given  group,  but  it  is  possible  to  differentiate  between  the  larger  groups, 
varieties,  species,  genera,  orders  and  classes  to  which  the  individuals  belong. 

3 


4  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Among  the  higher  organisms  we  distinguish  individuals  the  more  readily,  the 
more  varied  the  bodily  features  and  the  psychical  reactions  and  the  more 
intimately  we  are  acquainted  with  the  peculiarities  which  each  individual 
possesses.  In  the  phylogenetically  higher  organisms  the  differentiation  between 
the  various  parts,  together  with  their  functions,  is  greater,  and  likewise  the 
integration  of  the  parts  into  one  organism  is  more  fixed  and  rigid.  Here  it  is 
evident  that  the  individual,  as  a  whole,  is  the  unit  in  the  biological  and  in  the 
social  sense,  and  not  the  elements  of  which  the  individual  is  composed — the 
cells,  tissues  and  organs ;  nor  is  a  group  of  individuals,  whether  a  family,  clan, 
nation  or  race,  the  real  unit.  Under  natural  conditions  the  smaller  component 
units  depend  upon  the  other  constituents  of  the  integrated  individual  for  their 
life  and  function,  but  the  groups  consist  of  individuals  who,  if  necessary,  are 
able  to  live  and  function  independently  of  the  other  units  of  the  group.  It  is, 
therefore,  the  effects  which  the  actions  and  policies  of  the  various  groups 
exert  on  the  individual  which  is  the  ultimate  test  of  their  value.  The  wellbeing 
of  the  group  depends  upon  the  wellbeing  of  the  individuals  of  which  it  is  com- 
posed ;  but  conversely,  social  relationship  to  other  individuals  and  a  healthy 
group  life  are  conditions  which  promote  the  wellbeing  of  the  individual,  while 
unfavorable  social  relations  injure  him. 

All  these  individual  characteristics  in  living  organisms  which  we  have  men- 
tioned so  far,  are  localized  in  certain  areas  of  the  organism,  in  special  organs 
or  tissues,  and  they  are  either  structural  or  functional  peculiarities  of  the 
latter.  If  we  conceive  of  the  individual  as  a  mosaic  of  many  tissues  and  organs, 
each  one  functioning  and  metabolizing  in  its  own  peculiar  way,  we  may  con- 
sider this  mosaic  of  separate  parts  as  the  biological  basis  of  individuality,  in- 
cluding the  psychical  characteristics ;  and  in  order  to  understand  individuality 
in  this  sense  we  would  have  to  study  the  peculiarities  of  the  units  composing 
such  a  mosaic  in  each  individual.  Also,  the  nervous  system  and  the  hormone 
system  which  serve  as  means  of  communication  between  the  various  parts  of 
the  body,  represent  special  organs  or  products  of  organs  and  are  therefore 
parts  of  the  mosaic.  They  are  the  properties  of  organisms,  which  are  analyzed 
as  to  their  genetic  basis  by  means  of  hybridizations  according  to  Mendelian 
methods. 

There  is,  however,  in  addition  to  this  mosaic  basis  of  individuality,  another 
basis.  There  are  properties  which  are  not  restricted  to  certain  parts  of  the 
organism,  but  which  are  common  to  all,  or  almost  all,  parts  of  the  organism, 
and  which,  although  not  visible,  bind  them  together,  make  them  into  a  unit  and 
differentiate  one  individual  from  every  other  individual ;  also  one  species, 
genus,  order,  class  of  organisms  from  every  other  species,  genus,  order  and 
class.  There  is  inherent  in  every  higher  individual  organism  something  which 
differentiates  him  from  every  other  individual,  which  can  be  discovered  by 
observing  the  reactions  of  certain  cells  and  tissues  belonging  to  one  individual 
towards  the  tissues  and  cells  of  another  individual  of  the  same  species.  These 
reactions  are  indicative  of  a  characteristic  common  to  all  the  parts  of  one 
organism,  which  differs  from  the  analogous  characteristic  of  all  the  parts  in  a 
different  organism  of  the  same  species.  And  not  only  do  the  cells  and  tissues 


INTRODUCTION  5 

of  one  individual  recognize  different  individuals  as  such,  they  do  more  than 
that,  they  recognize,  to  speak  in  a  metaphorical  way,  the  degree  of  difference 
between  two  individuals  in  accordance  with  their  genetic  constitution. 

It  is  not  only  the  cells  and  tissues  of  one  individual,  however,  which  react 
towards  these  elements  of  another  individual  in  such  a  specific  manner,  but 
there  is  also  a  substance  in  the  bodyfluids  of  one  individual  which  responds 
towards  all  the  cells  and  tissues  of  another  individual  in  accordance  with  the 
degree  of  the  genetic  difference  between  these  two  individuals.  This  again 
indicates  that  there  is  a  constituent  common  to  all  the  tissues  of  an  organism 
which  interacts  with  a  constituent  in  the  blood  serum  of  another  individual. 

We  may  designate  this  particular  characteristic  distinguishing  one  indi- 
vidual from  another  as  his  individuality  differential;  it  is  common  to  all  the 
various  tissues  and  organs  of  an  individual.  In  the  same  way,  there  are 
characteristics  common  to  all  members  of  a  species,  genus,  order  and  class, 
which  may  be  called  species-genus-order-class  differentials,  and  these  may 
be  designated  in  their  totality,  together  with  the  individuality  differentials,  as 
organismal  differentials,  among  which  the  individuality  differential  is  the 
highest  and  finest  one.  In  contrast  to  these,  in  particular  to  the  individuality 
differentials,  are  the  tissues  and  organ  differentials,  which  differentiate  from 
one  another  the  different  tissues  and  organs,  such  as  liver,  kidney,  thyroid, 
carti'age,  epidermis,  in  the  same  individual. 

Theoretically  it  is  of  course  conceivable  that  two  individuals  belonging  to 
the  same  species,  other  than  unioval  twins,  possess  exactly  the  same  genetic 
constitution  and  that  accordingly  their  individuality  differentials  are  identical ; 
but  considering  the  large  number  of  genes  which  in  all  probability  determine 
this  differential  and  considering  also  the  possibility  that  mutations  occur 
spontaneously  in  the  genetic  constitution  of  individuals,  such  a  state  of 
identity  must  be  very  rare  indeed.  Actually  it  has  never  been  observed  in  the 
course  of  our  experiments  which  were  numerous  and  which  extended  over 
a  long  period  of  time,  except  possibly  among  brothers  in  a  closely  inbred 
family  of  guinea  pigs ;  but  even  in  this  case  the  actual  identity  has  not  been 
as  yet  definitely  proven.  However,  as  far  as  the  identity  of  ordinary,  non- 
related  individuals  of  the  same  species  is  concerned,  the  occurrence  of  such 
an  identity  is  so  improbable  that  it  has  not  been  considered  in  the  chapters 
of  this  book,  in  which  only  the  principles  underlying  the  concept  of  individu- 
ality are  discussed. 

There  are  two  principal  methods  by  means  of  which  the  organismal 
differentials  in  general  can  be  analyzed,  namely,  (1)  by  various  types  of 
transplantation,  and  (2)  by  serological  methods.  As  to  transplantation,  in  a 
wider  sense  we  may  include  also  parabiosis,  the  joining  together  of  two  fully 
formed  organisms  and  also  the  uniting  of  parts  of  embryos  or  of  blastomeres ; 
even  the  transfer  of  a  spermatozoon  into  the  egg  during  the  process  of 
fertilization  and  the  joining  together  of  parts  of  free-living  cells,  such  as 
protozoa,  may  be  considered  as  types  of  transplantation.  Transplantation 
and  serological  methods  are  not  equally  well  adapted  to  the  analysis  of 
organismal  differentials;  each  has  its  own  sphere  in  which  it  can  be  applied 


6  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  the  greatest  advantage.  While  the  serological  tests  are  especially  useful 
in  the  analysis  of  the  differentials  of  groups  of  animals,  such  as  species, 
genera,  orders  and  classes,  transplantation  experiments  are  best  suited  for 
the  analysis  of  the  differences  between  individuals  as  expressed  in  their  indi- 
viduality differentials.  The  study  of  transplantation  among  more  primitive 
organisms  may  contribute  to  our  knowledge  of  the  phylogenetic  development 
of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  experiments  in  hybridization  as  well  as 
in  transplantation  of  embryonal  tissues  may  aid  in  the  analysis  of  the  onto- 
genetic development  of  the  organismal  differentials. 

We  are  concerned  principally  with  the  study  of  that  type  of  organismal 
differential  which  we  have  designated  as  the  individuality  differential,  and  here 
the  basic  experiment  is  the  following:  Various  organs  or  tissues  are  trans- 
planted from  one  animal,  e.g.,  a  guinea  pig,  into  two  other  guinea  pigs  not 
directly  related  to  the  first  guinea  pig  from  which  the  tissues  were  taken ;  this 
is  called  homoiotransplantation.  It  is  seen  that  the  reactions  of  the  hosts  of 
the  multiple  grafts  toward  the  latter  differ  in  accordance  with  the  degree  of 
genetic  relationship  between  host  and  donor,  but  the  host  behaves  in  approxi- 
mately the  same  way  toward  the  various  tissues  from  the  same  donor.  In  one 
animal  the  reactions  are  severe  to  all  the  tissues,  in  the  other  one  they  may  be 
very  light.  These  reactions  consist  in  the  activity  of  the  lymphocytes,  the  con- 
nective tissue  cells  and  blood  vessels  of  the  host  towards  the  grafts ;  in  addi- 
tion, tissues,  especially  the  more  sensitive  ones,  are  also  influenced  by  the 
degree  of  their  compatibility  with  certain  constituents  of  the  blood  of  the 
host,  and  the  degree  of  this  sensitiveness  again  depends  upon  the  genetic 
relationship  between  host  and  transplant.  In  general,  tissues  are  injured  by 
the  bodyfluids  of  a  strange  host,  and  in  some  species  this  injurious  action 
plays  a  greater  role  than  in  others.  However,  in  all  the  species  which  we  have 
studied  so  far  it  is  the  lymphocytes  which  sense  or  recognize  the  finest  degrees 
of  similarity  or  difference  in  the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials 
between  host  and  transplant.  The  distinctive  reaction  of  the  connective  tissue 
cells  becomes  noticeable  if  there  is  a  slightly  greater  difference  between  these 
differentials.  The  statement  that  all  the  tissues  from  the  same  donor  elicit 
the  same  intensity  of  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  same  host  is  true  in  a  relative, 
but  not  in  an  absolute,  sense.  Different  tissues  have  an  unequal  power  to  call 
forth  these  reactions ;  thus,  for  instance,  thyroid  gland  usually  induces  a 
stronger  reaction  than  cartilage  and  perichondrium.  This  is  evidently  due  to 
the  fact  that  a  certain  substance  responsible  for  the  reaction,  the  individuality 
differential,  is  given  off  in  sufficient  quantities  more  readily  by  thyroid  than 
by  cartilage,  which  latter  has  a  more  inert  metabolism.  However,  notwith- 
standing these  differences  between  different  tissues  and  organs,  in  all  of  them 
the  genetic  relationship  between  host  and  transplant  determines  the  intensity 
of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  trans- 
plant. 

There  is  a  second  type  of  experiment  which  brings  out  the  meaning  of  the 
individuality  differential.  This  introduces  variations  in  the  relationship  be- 
tween host  and  transplant  which  are  expressed  by  the  terms :  auto-,  syn- 


INTRODUCTION  7 

genesio-,  homoio-  and  heterotransplantation.  The  transplantation  of  various 
kinds  of  tissues  and  organ  pieces  into  the  same  animal  from  which  they  were 
taken  and  to  which,  therefore,  they  belonged,  is  called  autotrans  plantation. 
Here  we  find  that  lymphocytes  are  practically  lacking  around  the  graft;  con- 
nective tissue  cells  are  attracted  in  only  a  moderate  number  and  instead  of 
producing  dense  fibrous  tissue,  which  is  characteristic  of  their  reaction  against 
a  strange  individuality  differential,  they  form  only  a  loose  embryonal  stroma 
around  the  transplanted  cells.  The  blood  vessel  supply  is  rich  and  in  the  course 
of  a  relatively  short  time  the  transplant  assumes  about  the  condition  of  the 
normal  tissue  or  organ  in  the  host.  All  tissues  from  the  same  organism  behave 
in  this  respect,  in  principle,  in  the  same  way,  except  that  some  tissues  can 
withstand  the  injury  connected  with  the  process  of  transplantation  much 
better  than  others.  We  may  then  conclude  that  it  is  not  the  organ  or  tissue 
differentials  which  determine  these  injurious  reactions  of  the  host  cells 
towards  the  grafts,  but  the  individuality  differentials.  The  chemical  consti- 
tution of  liver  and  of  kidney  is  very  different,  but  this  difference  has  no  effect 
on  the  host  cells — they  react  in  about  the  same  way  towards  liver  and  kidney, 
provided  these  tissues  possess  the  same  individuality  differential ;  however,  a 
slight  difference  in  the  chemical  constitution  of  the  individuality  differential 
sets  unfavorable  reactions  in  motion ;  and  it  makes  little  difference  whether  the 
strange  individuality  differential  is  attached  to  organ  differentials  of  kidney, 
liver,  skin,  cartilage,  uterus  or  thyroid.  The  various  organ  differentials  all 
behave  in  about  the  same  way. 

This,  then,  is  the  first  important  fact:  the  host  cells  recognize  in  a  very 
subtle  way  differences  in  individuality  differentials.  But  they  can  do  more 
than  this.  As  stated  above,  they  are  able  to  recognize  the  degree  of  difference 
and  to  react  accordingly.  Thus,  when  a  piece  of  tissue  from  brother  to  brother 
is  transplanted — a  method  designated  as  syngenesiotrans plantation — the  cells 
of  the  one  which  functions  as  host  are  not  as  much  stimulated  or  excited  by 
the  presence  of  a  tissue  so  closely  related  to  his  own  as  by  the  tissues  from  a 
non-related  individual  {hornoiotrans plantation) ,  the  individuality  differentials 
being  more  similar  in  the  first  case.  This  observation  holds  good  especially  if 
the  parents  belong  to  closely  inbred  strains ;  otherwise  brothers  and  sisters  may 
be  genetically  similar  to  each  other  to  very  different  degrees  and  therefore,  in 
some  instances,  the  reaction  against  a  tissue  of  a  brother  may  be  about  the 
same  as  against  that  of  a  stranger,  and  if  the  strangeness  exceeds  a  certain 
limit,  it  is  no  longer  the  lymphocytes  which  are  active,  but  the  connective 
tissue  cells  and  the  injurious  substances  of  the  bodyfluids.  On  the  contrary, 
in  certain  inbred  strains  the  individuality  differentials  of  all  the  animals 
belonging  to  such  a  strain  may  have  become  so  similar  that  no  or  only  very 
slight  differences  can  be  established  between  brothers  and  not  directly  related 
individuals  within  the  same  strain. 

On  the  other  hand,  if  a  piece  of  tissue  is  transplanted  from  one  animal  to 
another  which  is  genetically  still  further  removed  than  in  cases  of  homoio- 
transplantation,  as  when  animals  from  different  species  serve  as  host  and 
graft,  the  reactions  are  more  severe.  This  procedure  is  called  heterotrans- 


8  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

plantation.  In  this  instance  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  are  so  different  from 
those  to  which  the  tissues  of  the  transplant  are  adapted  that  they  exert  a 
strongly  injurious  effect  and  kill  the  graft  in  a  relatively  short  time;  the 
length  of  time  in  which  this  can  be  accomplished  depends,  among  other  factors, 
upon  the  degree  of  resistance  of  the  particular  tissue.  The  reaction  of  the 
connective  tissue  of  the  host  is  very  strong  in  heterotransplantation ;  besides, 
it  is  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  which  are  attracted  first,  rather  than 
the  lymphocytes,  indicating  the  presence  of  a  substance  which  acts  as  a 
stronger  poison,  a  heterotoxin.  The  reaction  of  the  lymphocytes  is  the  test  for 
the  presence  of  a  milder  toxin,  namely,  homoio-  or  syngenesiotoxin.  However, 
in  places  where  the  toxin  action  is  weaker  or  at  a  later  period  when  the 
acutely-acting  toxins  have  been  largely  absorbed,  lymphocytes  may  also  be 
attracted  and  collect  in  large  masses  around  tissues  derived  from  a  strange 
species.  We  see,  then,  that  the  host  cells  not  only  recognize  a  strange  organis- 
mal  differential,  but  they  also  distinguish  between  different  degrees  of  rela- 
tionship or  strangeness.  But  there  is  a  limit  to  this  power  of  discrimination.  If 
a  certain  threshold  of  strangeness  has  been  reached,  the  reaction  is  maximal 
and  cannot  be  much  increased  if  the  tissues  from  individuals  belonging 
to  still  further  removed  classes  are  used.  In  this  case  serological  tests  are 
better  able  to  grade  differences.  The  cellular  reactions  with  which  we  have 
to  deal  in  transplantation  are  comparable  to  a  very  sensitive  balance  which 
indicates  small  fractions  of  a  milligram  and  which  cannot  be  used  for  the 
detection  of  differences  which  are  measured  by  pounds.  On  the  other  hand, 
serological  tests  are  only  under  very  restricted  conditions  serviceable  in  the 
detection  of  finer  differences.  Thus,  the  experiments  of  Todd  (to  which  we 
shall  refer  later)  show  that  under  certain  circumstances  serological  tests  also 
may  indicate  the  presence  of  strange  individuality  differentials ;  but  only  with 
one  particular  kind  of  structure,  the  erythrocytes,  has  this  test  been  used,  and 
even  then  it  did  not  as  a  rule  reveal  the  degree  of  relationship  or  strangeness 
between  the  individuals  which  were  compared. 

Certain  experiments  show  that  the  similarity  or  difference  between  two 
individuality  differentials  corresponds  to  the  similarity  or  difference  in  the 
composition  of  the  gene  sets  in  the  host  and  donor,  and  that  the  host  cells 
respond,  so  to  speak,  to  genes  which  are  strange  to  them.  In  reality,  however, 
it  is  not  the  genes  as  such  to  which  the  host  cells  react,  but  the  organismal, 
and  in  particular  the  individuality,  differentials  which  develop  in  accordance 
with  the  gene  sets. 

That  it  is  the  similarity  or  difference  in  the  gene  sets  in  two  individuals 
which  primarily  determines  the  kind  of  reaction  which  takes  place  between 
host  and  transplant  is  also  indicated  by  the  fact  that  if,  through  close  inbreed- 
ing, we  render  their  gene  composition  more  similar,  the  individuality  differen- 
tials correspondingly  become  more  and  more  similar  in  successive  generations 
and  the  severity  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  graft  is  correspondingly 
diminished.  But  it  has  been  found  very  difficult  to  produce  complete  identity  of 
the  individuality  differentials  even  under  these  conditions.  It  seems,  moreover, 
that  in  different  species  closely  inbred  animals  differ  in  respect  to  the  readiness 


INTRODUCTION  9 

with  which  the  stage  of  identity  of  the  individuality  differentials  is  approached 
or  becomes  manifest,  and  the  transplantation  method  can  be  applied  in  order 
to  test  to  what  degree  the  gene  composition  in  the  individuals  belonging  to 
a  closely  inbred  family  or  strain  has  become  similar,  or,  expressed  differently, 
the  degree  of  homozygosity  which  has  been  reached  in  such  a  strain. 

That  it  is  the  strange  genes  in  the  graft  on  which  the  reaction  of  the  host 
against  the  transplant  depends  is  confirmed,  also,  by  experiments  in  which  two 
inbred  strains  were  hybridized  and  the  reactions  of  individuals  belonging  to 
the  parent  strains  against  tissues  or  organs  of  the  hybrids  were  compared  with 
the  reactions  of  the  hybrids  against  transplants  from  the  parent  strains.  In 
the  former  case  the  reactions  were  more  severe  than  in  the  latter  case;  this 
corresponds  to  the  fact  that  only  one-half  of  the  hybrid  genes  is  represented 
in  the  inbred  parent  strains,  while  the  genes  of  parent  strains  are  all  present 
in  the  gene  sets  of  the  hybrids. 

In  the  course  of  phylogenetic  evolution,  gene  sets  which  are  characteristic 
of  the  more  highly  differentiated  species  have  gradually  evolved  from  the 
gene  sets  of  other  more  primitive  ancestor  species,  and  the  organismal 
differentials  have  undergone  a  corresponding  development.  On  the  other  hand, 
in  the  fertilized  ovum  the  chromosomes  and  gene  sets  are  the  same  as  in  the 
cells  of  the  adult  organism.  Yet  there  are  indications  that  in  the  fertilized  tgg 
the  individuality  differential  is  not  yet  fully  formed,  but  that  it  develops  from 
a  precursor  substance  in  the  course  of  embryonal  life;  it  is  certain  that  at  least 
the  mechanism  which  makes  the  differences  in  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  transplant  manifest  undergoes  such  an  evolution.  Even  in  very 
young  guinea  pigs,  before  the  age  of  sexual  maturity,  these  mechanisms  of 
defense  against  a  strange  individuality  differential  are  not  yet  fully  developed, 
.as  is  indicated  by  transplantation  experiments  of  tissues  into  hosts  of  various 
ages.  The  connective  tissue  reaction  is  diminished  in  intensity  and  the  lympho- 
cytes may  have  therefore  a  better  chance  to  become  active  in  these  young 
animals. 

As  to  the  number  of  genes  which  determine  the  nature  of  the  individuality 
differentials,  no  definite  statement  can  be  made.  However,  considering  the 
difficulty  in  eradicating  reactions  against  other  than  autotransplants,  even  in 
individuals  belonging  to  strains  closely  inbred  through  a  large  number  of 
generations,  and  considering  the  improbability  of  ever  obtaining  an  autoge- 
nous reaction  after  homoiotransplantations  in  non-inbred  strains,  also  in  view 
of  the  fact  that  the  reactions  are  so  very  finely  graded  and  that  a  homoio-  or 
syngenesio-reaction  after  transplantation  of  a  piece  of  tissue  belonging  to 
another  individual  may  appear  as  late  as  several  months  following  transplanta- 
tion, it  is  very  likely  that  the  number  of  genes  entering  into  the  composition 
of  the  individuality  differential  is  great  and  that  perhaps  all  the  genes  partici- 
pate, although  different  ones  possibly  to  a  different  degree.  Both  organismal 
differentials  and  organ  and  tissue  differentials  depend  entirely,  or  to  a  large 
extent,  on  the  constitutions  of  chromosomes  and  genes ;  but  the  genes  and 
combinations  of  genes  which  preponderate  as  determiners  of  these  two  types 
of  differentials  are  evidently  not  the  same  and  there  are  indications  that  it  is 


10  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

certain  gene  sets  rather  than  individual  genes  which  represent  the  precursors 
of  organismal  differentials.  While  the  individuality  differential  is  therefore 
determined  by  the  gene  composition,  it  is  not  identical  with  the  gene  sets 
but  differs  from  them  in  a  way  in  which  other  characters  of  the  adult  organism 
differ  from  the  gene  sets.  Gene  hormones  may  mediate  the  effects  of  the  genes 
on  the  organismal  differentials;  also,  other  factors  which  form  part  of  the 
environment  in  which  the  organism  develops  may  conceivably  modify  the 
development  of  the  individuality  differential  from  its  precursor  substances,  and 
there  are  indications  that  adaptive  processes  which  may  take  place  in  the  inter- 
action between  host  and  transplant  may  modify  these  differentials,  or  at  least 
their  manifestation.  Such  adaptive  processes  are  very  prominent  in  serial 
transplantations  of  tumors.  Yet  there  remains  constant  the  difference  between 
the  individuality  differentials  and  the  organismal  differentials  in  general  on 
the  one  hand,  and  the  differentials  of  specific  organs  and  tissues  on  the  other 
hand;  the  organismal,  and  in  particular  the  individuality  differentials  are  the 
same  in  all  the  tissues  and  organs  within  the  same  organism,  while  each  organ 
and  tissue  has  in  addition  its  specific  differential. 

There  exist,  then,  perhaps  conditions  which  may  complicate  the  direct 
relation  between  organismal  differentials  and  the  gene  sets  which  ultimately 
determine  the  nature  of  these  differentials.  There  are,  in  addition,  several  other 
complicating  factors.  In  no  case  is  it  possible  to  determine  the  organismal,  and 
in  particular  the  individuality  differentials  directly,  but  we  determine  the 
consequences  of  the  interaction  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant;  we  observe  their  manifestation  and  this  depends  not  only  on  the 
nature  of  the  organismal  differentials  but  also  on  the  amount  of  organismal 
differences  produced  and  given  off  by  the  host,  and  especially  also  by  the 
transplant,  on  the  degree  of  reactivity  of  the  host  against  strange  differentials, 
on  the  mode  of  attack  on  the  part  of  the  host,  and  on  the  ability  of  the  graft 
to  resist  these  injurious  conditions.  A  tissue  that  is  readily  injured  will  not 
give  off  its  individuality  differentials  for  any  length  of  time,  because  it  will 
be  converted  into  a  lifeless  foreign  body  which  has  lost  its  specificity. 

Notwithstanding  these  difficulties  it  is  possible  to  analyze  the  nature  of  the 
organismal  differentials  if  we  carry  out  a  number  of  sufficiently  varied  experi- 
ments, and  by  these  means  it  is  also  possible  to  follow  the  formation  of  the 
organismal  differentials  in  the  course  of  phylogenetic  evolution  and  onto- 
genetic development,  and  the  gradual  refinement  of  these  differentials  as  indi- 
cated by  the  appearance  and  increasing  significance  of  the  individuality 
differentials.  However,  this  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development  is  not 
represented  by  a  straight  ascending  line.  There  are  various  branches  given 
off  by  the  main  line  which  indicate  the  development  of  mechanisms  closely 
resembling  the  active  individuality  differentials,  but-  which  may  not  be 
identical  with  the  latter ;  in  such  instances  it  may  not  be  possible  to  determine 
whether  we  have  to  deal  with  real  organismal  differentials,  to  which  the 
criteria  we  have  discussed  apply.  In  particular,  it  is  impossible  to  apply  this 
term  in  the  strict  sense  to  unicellular  free-living  organisms.  Thus  the  attempt 
to  join  together  the  main  body  of  a  rhizopod  and  a  pseudopod,  which  has 


INTRODUCTION  11 

been  cut  off  from  either  the  same  individual  or  from  a  different  individual, 
succeeds  when  there  is  an  autogenous  relationship  between  the  remaining  part 
of  the  cell  and  the  pseudopod,  but  it  leads  to  abnormal  reactions  when  there 
is  a  homoiogenous  relationship.  The  nature  of  the  reaction  seems  to  depend 
on  a  specific  sensitive  state  of  the  ectoplasmic  layer  of  the  cell  protoplasm,  and 
also  in  part  on  the  diffusion  of  certain  substances  into  the  surrounding 
medium.  In  various  species  of  Paramecium  peculiar  agglutination  reactions 
between  different  individuals  belonging  to  a  certain  species,  have  been 
observed,  which  are  characteristic  of  each  species.  In  general,  cells  belonging 
to  the  same  group  do  not  agglutinate  with  one  another,  but  individuals  be- 
longing to  well  defined,  strange  groups  of  the  same  species  do  agglutinate. 
These  reactions  resemble  those  of  organismal  differentials  insofar  as  rela- 
tionship between  different  organisms  is  a  factor  which  determines  the  reac- 
tion, but  they  differ  from  organismal  differential  reactions  in  that  the  reaction 
seems  to  depend  upon  the  condition  of  a  restricted  portion  of  the  unicellular 
organism  and  that  specific  functions  are  accomplished  by  means  of  these 
reactions,  which  are  those  of  certain  organs  rather  than  of  organismal  differ- 
entials. A  similar  problem  arises  in  regard  to  the  relations  between  sperma- 
tozoa and  eggs.  These  relations  are  in  certain  respects  comparable  to  those 
existing  between  graft  and  host;  but  while  in  the  latter  an  autogenous  rela- 
tionship is  most  adequate,  in  the  case  of  sperm  and  ova  a  homoiogenous 
relationship  seems  in  many  instances  to  be  as  good,  or  even  better,  than  an 
autogenous  condition.  Indeed,  in  some  organisms,  plants  as  well  as  animals, 
specific  mechanisms  exist  which  tend  to  prevent  autofertilization.  These 
mechanisms  depend  apparently  upon  the  reaction  which  takes  place,  perhaps 
by  means  of  contact  substances,  between  certain  somatic  cells  belonging  to  the 
female  organism  and  the  spermatozoa  or  its  analogue  in  plants,  or  in  other 
cases  they  depend  upon  the  direct  interaction  between  egg  and  spermatozoon. 
In  the  adult  organism  the  various  organs  and  tissues  may  possess,  in  addi- 
tion to  the  typical  species  and  individuality  differentials,  structures  and  sub- 
stances which  are  specific  not  only  for  this  particular  organ  and  tissue,  but 
also  for  the  species  to  which  the  organism  belongs.  The  organs  and  tissues 
of  related  species  as  a  rule  resemble  one  another  more  closely  than  those  of 
more  distant  species.  The  substances  which  are  the  bearers  of  these  character- 
istics may,  therefore,  have  something  in  common  with  the  species  differential 
or  even  with  the  individuality  differential  substances.  However,  they  differ 
from  the  latter  in  that  they  are  peculiar  to  a  certain  organ  or  tissue.  They 
are  not  identical  with  the  typical  species  differentials ;  this  is  indicated  also  by 
the  fact  that  their  chemical  reactions  may  differ  in  certain  respects  from 
those  of  the  typical  species  or  individuality  differentials.  We  may  designate 
these  characters  and  substances  as  secondary  or  accessory  organismal  differ- 
entials. In  many  cases  it  is  not  possible  to  determine  to  which  of  these  two 
classes  a  certain  substance  belongs  and  then  we  must  be  content  to  apply  the 
term  organismal  differential,  and  in  particular,  species  and  individuality 
differential,  in  a  general  way,  comprising  both  the  primary  and  secondary  or 
accessory  organismal  differentials. 


12  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Not  every  substance  produced  by  tissues  or  accumulating  in  certain  organs 
possesses  an  individuality  differential.  Many  hormones,  and  the  vitamines, 
do  not  have  individuality  differentials,  while  other  hormones  have  at  least 
some  of  the  coarser  organismal  differentials.  It  is  especially  the  most  complex 
protein  substances  which  act  as  bearers  of  organismal  differentials.  But  there 
are  end-products  of  embryonal  differentiation  in  which  the  cells,  which  give 
origin  to  certain  tissues,  have  been  largely  replaced  by  secondary  paraplastic 
substances,  such  as  the  lens  fibers  of  the  vertebrate  eye.  In  these  the  finer 
organismal  differentials  have  apparently  disappeared  and  only  some  of  the 
coarser  ones  have  remained;  instead,  the  organ  differentials  have  become 
more  prominent.  This  is  indicated  if  serological  tests  are  used.  However,  if  we 
use  finer  tissue  reactions  as  a  test,  the  presence  of  individuality  differentials 
can  be  demonstrated  even  in  tissues  of  this  kind,  as  shown  in  the  recent 
experiments  of  H.  T.  Blumenthal.  He  has  demonstrated  that  after  homoio- 
transplantation  of  a  lobe  of  thyroid  gland,  and  of  pieces  of  liver  or  kidney, 
from  guinea  pigs  to  other  non-related  guinea  pigs,  the  number  of  lymphocytes 
circulating  in  the  blood  rises,  about  five  to  seven  days  after  transplantation, 
by  approximately  15  to  25  percent,  and  having  reached  this  maximum  it 
begins  to  fall  again.  After  transplantation  of  cartilage  however,  such  a  rise 
is  lacking  entirely  or  almost  entirely,  because  the  amount  of  homoiodifferential 
given  off  by  this  tissue  is  apparently  insufficient  to  reach  the  threshold  neces- 
sary for  the  reaction.  After  syngenesiotransplantation  the  increase  in  lympho- 
cytes begins,  on  the  average,  at  a  later  date  and  remains  lower.  After  hetero- 
transplantation it  is  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  which  show  an  increase 
in  the  general  circulation ;  later  they  fall  to  the  normal  level  and  this  phase  is 
followed  by  a  second  phase  in  which  the  lymphocytes  rise ;  after  a  few  days 
this  latter  rise  is  likewise  followed  by  a  fall.  As  far  as  we  can  judge,  these 
changes  in  the  number  and  character  of  the  blood  cells  are  specific;  inert 
foreign  bodies,  for  instance  agar,  do  not  bring  about  such  a  rise.  The  effects 
produced  by  transplants  on  the  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leuco- 
cytes circulating  in  the  blood  are  closely  parallel  to  the  effects  which  the  trans- 
plants exert  locally  on  the  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  but 
some  of  the  effects  of  the  strange  organismal  differentials  are  more  readily 
demonstrated  by  a  study  of  the  cell  and  tissue  reaction  taking  place  around 
the  grafts.  By  means  of  this  general  reaction  it  can  be  shown  that  the  lens  of  the 
eye  also  possesses  an  individuality  differential,  although,  if  serological  tests  are 
used,  it  seems  to  be  devoid  of  species  and  individuality  differentials. 

We  see,  then,  that  tissues  give  off  substances  which  differ  in  their  effects  in 
accordance  with  the  genetic  relationship  of  the  tissues  to  the  host  organism.  In 
their  own  natural  habitat  these  substances  are  of  an  autogenous  character  and 
do  not  incite  any  abnormal  reaction;  but  in  accordance  with  the  genetic 
strangeness  existing  between  transplant  and  host,  they  assume  the  character 
of  toxic  substances,  which  call  forth  abnormal  reactions  in  the  host.  In  near 
relatives  these  substances — the  organismal  differentials — act  as  syngenesio- 
toxins ;  in  a  strange  individual  of  the  same  species  they  act  as  homoiotoxins, 


INTRODUCTION  13 

and  in  a  different  species,  as  heterotoxins.  The  chemical  nature  of  the  latter 
is  distinct  from  that  of  the  syngenesio-  and  homoiotoxins. 

Furthermore,  these  substances,  the  organismal  differentials,  diffuse  not  only 
into  the  area  directly  surrounding  the  transplanted  piece,  but  they  also  enter 
the  circulation  and  are  carried  by  the  blood  and  lymph  to  more  distant  organs. 
This  may  be  concluded  from  the  observation,  already  stated,  that  transplanta- 
tion of  a  normal  piece  of  grafted  tissue  induces  changes  in  the  relative  pro- 
portions of  the  circulating  blood  cells,  which  are  parallel  to  the  degree  of 
relationship  or  strangeness  between  host  and  transplant  and  which  depend 
therefore  on  the  nature  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  graft.  Such 
substances,  corresponding  to  individuality  and  species  differentials,  enter  the 
blood  and  exert  their  effects  in  distant  parts  and  thus  resemble  hormones  in 
their  action. 

When  they  have  reached  and  are  retained  in  certain  organs,  such  as  spleen 
and  bone  marrow,  they  may,  in  addition,  stimulate  the  formation  of  immune 
substances,  since  they  are  strange  to  the  individual  or  to  the  species  in  which 
they  circulate.  It  is  especially  the  organismal  differentials  derived  from  a 
different  species,  or  even  from  a  different  individual,  which  initiate  defensive 
processes  of  immunity ;  being  strange  to  the  new  host  they  disturb  his  equilib- 
rium, which  is  attuned  to  substances  possessing  his  own  specific  organismal 
differentials.  These  strange  substances  act,  therefore,  as  antigens.  Organ 
differentials  as  such  may  not  be  strange  to  the  host,  in  this  sense,  and  as  a  rule 
they  function  as  antigens  only  in  combination  with  a  strange  organismal 
differential. 

If,  then,  we  may  consider  it  an  established  fact  that  when  tissues  are  trans- 
planted from  one  to  another  individual  of  the  same  species,  including  even 
nearly  related  individuals  such  as  brother  or  sister,  substances  are  given  off  by 
these  tissues  which  call  forth  noticeable  reactions  on  the  part  of  the  host  cells, 
might  it  not  be  possible,  or  even  probable,  that  such  substances,  acting  on 
nearby  tissues  as  contact  substances  or  on  farther  distant  tissues  as  hormones, 
are  also  given  off  in  the  animal's  own  organism ;  but  that,  here,  instead  of 
operating  as  disturbers  of  the  tissue  equilibrium,  on  the  contrary,  they  serve 
as  instruments  by  means  of  which  the  tissue  equilibrium  is  maintained  and 
regulated  in  such  a  manner  that  it  is  best  adapted  to  the  normal  cooperation  of 
the  various  tissues  in  the  interest  of  the  entire  organism,  and  thus  to  the 
normal  functioning  of  the  organism  as  a  whole?  Such  substances,  represent- 
ing the  individuality  differential,  if  discharged  into  an  animal's  own  organism 
may  then  be  designated  as  autogenous  substances.  If  two  tissues,  possessing 
two  different  individuality  differentials,  adjoin  each  other,  signs  of  disharmony 
develop,  which  are  partly  or  largely  due  to  the  action  of  disharmonious  in- 
dividuality differentials.  This  applies,  for  instance,  to  homoiogenous  skin 
transplants.  Conversely,  may  we  not  assume  that  since  the  epithelial  cells  in 
the  normal  skin  remain  at  rest,  this  is  due  at  least  partly  to  the  action  of  the 
autogenous  substances  which  keep  the  neighboring  epithelial  cells  as  well  as 
the  underlying  connective  tissue  and  lymphocytes  in  a  quiescent  state? 


14  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

However,  a  disequilibrated  condition  may  occasionally  be  observed  even 
after  allotransplantation,  for  instance,  if  pigmented  skin  is  transplanted  into 
a  defect  in  white  skin  of  the  same  guinea  pig.  Notwithstanding  the  identity  of 
the  individuality  differential  in  this  case,  the  transplanted  pigmented  epidermis 
begins  to  infiltrate  the  neighboring  white  epidermis  for  a  considerable  time, 
but  ultimately  a  new  tissue  equilibrium  is  established  and  then  the  autogenous 
tissues  live  harmoniously  side  by  side.  The  pigmented  epithelium  is  the  more 
active,  vigorous  tissue,  and  stimulated  by  the  processes  connected  with  and 
following  transplantation  it  asserts  its  superiority  over  the  white  epithelium 
until  this  stimulation  has  died  out ;  yet  neither  connective  tissue  nor  lympho- 
cytes of  the  host  are  unduly  activated  under  these  conditions,  because  host  and 
graft  possess  the  same  individuality  differential. 

There  exists,  then,  a  mutual  adaptation  to  one  another  of  tissues  bearing  the 
same  organismal  differential,  and  there  exists,  also,  a  mutual  adaptation  be- 
tween the  blood  plasma  and  the  various  tissues  belonging  to  the  same  in- 
dividual. It  is  these  harmonious  interactions  which  make  the  unity  of  the 
organism  possible  and  which  are  perhaps  the  most  characteristic  feature  of 
the  living  organism  as  an  individual.  But  not  only  are  the  substances  charac- 
teristic of  each  individual  different  from  those  characteristic  of  any  other 
individual  and  in  this  sense  specific;  there  is,  besides,  a  second  type  of  speci- 
ficity, which  may  be  designated  as  specific  adaptation.  By  specific  adaptation 
we  mean  that  it  is  the  individuality,  species,  order  or  class  differentials,  in 
general  the  organismal  differentials,  attached  to  the  various  tissues  or  to  sub- 
stances derived  from  these  tissues,  which  determine  how  suitable  and  effective 
the  interactions  between  the  tissues  and  substances  are  in  the  performance  of 
certain  functions.  If  the  respective  organismal  differentials  are  the  same  in  the 
tissues  or  substances,  the  interaction  is  most  perfect.  This  statement  applies, 
for  instance,  to  the  interaction  between  tissue  extracts,  blood  plasma  and 
blood  serum.  The  character  of  the  organismal  differentials  attaching  to  these 
various  substances  determines  how  effective  the  coagulating  power  of  the 
extract  is,  and  how  effective  also  the  inhibiting  action  of  the  blood  serum  will 
be. 

We  may  then  distinguish  tivo  types  of  adaptation  within  the  organism.  The 
first  one  is  well  recognized;  it  is  represented  by  the  normal  interaction  of 
various  organs  and  of  parts  of  organs,  and  by  the  transmission  of  stimuli 
through  the  nervous  system,  through  hormones,  and  through  certain  other 
mechanisms.  This  is  the  basis  of  what  might  be  called  the  mosaic  type  of  in- 
dividuality. The  second  type  is  the  adaptation  which  depends  on  the  identity 
of  the  individuality  differentials  of  tissues.  The  integrity  of  the  organ  func- 
tions is  largely  based  on  this  identity  of  the  organismal  differentials.  But  in 
addition  a  number  of  chemical  interactions  in  the  organism,  of  which  only 
one  example  has  been  mentioned,  depend  specifically  on  the  character  of  the 
organismal  differentials  which  are  carried  by  these  substances.  This  is  the 
basis  of  what  might  be  called  the  essential  individuality,  in  contrast  to  the 
mosaic  type. 

Under  some  conditions  normal  tissues  act  as  though  they  were  abnormally 


INTRODUCTION  15 

stimulated ;  they  may  assume  increased  growth  and  at  the  same  time  undergo 
cerain  structural  and  metabolic  alterations.  These  characteristics  may  be  main- 
tained permanently  and  when  this  has  occurred,  then  normal  tissues  have  been 
changed  into  cancerous  tissues.  It  can  be  shown  that  the  latter  still  possess 
essentially  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  host  from  which  they  are  de- 
rived ;  but  they  differ  from  the  latter  by  an  increase  in  the  growth  momentum 
which  enables  them  in  certain  cases  to  overcome,  in  a  new  host,  injurious  con- 
ditions to  which  normal  tissues  would  succumb ;  they  also  seem  to  possess  a 
greater  ability  to  adapt  themselves  to  strange  hosts  and,  moreover,  they  give 
off  more  efficient  antigens  than  do  normal  tissues. 

It  is  essential  for  the  completeness  or  fulfillment  of  the  individuality  in 
higher  organisms  that  the  integrity  of  the  individuality  differentials  be  main- 
tained. An  intrusion  of  strange  substances  not  bearing  the  same  individuality 
differential  sets  in  motion  reactions  which  lead  to  their  splitting,  their  destruc- 
tion, or  their  elimination,  in  some  instances  after  they  have  been  made  innocu- 
ous through  conjugation  with  other  substances.  The  primary  local  tissue  reac- 
tions, as  well  as  the  secondary  local  reactions  of  allergy  and  the  general  reac- 
tions of  immunity,  serve  this  purpose.  But  the  organism  must  also  build  up 
his  species  and  individuality  differentials  out  of  non-specific  material  or  out 
of  material  which  carries  unsuitable  organismal  differentials ;  the  processes  of 
splitting  by  means  of  digestion  and  those  of  syntheses  lead  to  the  production 
of  building  stones  endowed  with  the  right  type  of  specificity,  and  they  bring 
about  the  replacement  of  lost  tissue  and  the  addition  of  new  material.  The 
specificity  of  enzymes  plays  an  important  part  in  these  operations.  There  are 
thus  strong  indications  that  the  individuality  differential  has  these  functions : 
(1)  to  co-ordinate  and  to  equilibrate  the  mutual  interaction  of  adjoining  and 
also  of  some  distant  tissues  in  such  a  way  that  the  inner  integrity  of  the  in- 
dividual is  insured,  and  (2)  to  combat  admixtures  from  strange  organisms 
and  perhaps  also  to  react  against  foreign  bodies  which  are  devoid  of  organis- 
mal differentials. 

The  organism  is,  then,  a  harmonious  whole,  a  combination  of  the  mosaic 
and  of  the  essential  type  of  individuality;  in  it,  therefore,  not  only  the  organ 
functions  are  adapted  to  one  another,  but  also  all  the  various  tissues,  though 
apparently  functionally  unrelated,  are  specifically  adapted  to  one  another, 
owing  to  the  nature  of  their  organismal  differentials.  This  latter  adaptation  is, 
above  all,  what  characterises  the  individual.  Such  a  harmonious  relationship 
must  be  based  on  resemblances  or  identities  in  certain  chemical  structures  of 
the  most  important  and  complex  substances  which  enter  into  the  building  of 
the  organism,  especially  substances  of  a  protein  nature.  Accordingly,  it  has 
been  established  that  the  hemoglobins  and  hemocyanins,  derived  from  various 
species,  or  from  still  larger  groups  of  animals,  are  the  most  nearly  identical  in 
structure  in  the  nearest  related  animals  and  are  the  more  dissimilar  in  struc- 
ture the  farther  distant  the  species  are.  In  accordance  with  what  we  have 
already  stated,  we  may  assume  that  the  same  chemical  gradation  in  the  struc- 
ture of  the  organism  in  correspondence  with  phylogenetic  relationship  must 
go  still  further,  not  only  each  species  but  each  individual  possessing  its 


16  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

chemical  characteristics,  which  differ  from  those  possessed  by  every  other 
individual  of  the  same  species. 

Two  possible  schematic  representations  of  the  chemical  constitutions  of  two 
different  individuals  may  be  considered:  (1)  Individual  A:  Tla — T2a — T3a — 
T4a.  .  .  .  Individual  B:  Tlb— T2b— T3b— T4b.  (2)  Individual  A:  Tla— T2b— 
T3c — T4d.  .  .  •  Individual  B:  Tlm — T2n — T3o — T4p.  Tx,  T2,  T3,  T4  represent 
organ  and  tissue  differentials,  such  as  those  of  liver,  kidney,  thyroid,  cartilage 
and  ear.  Provisionally  they  may  be  assumed  to  be  identical  in  two  individuals 
belonging  to  the  same  species  and  variety,  although  this  assumption  may  not  be 
entirely  correct,  a,  b,  c,  d  represent  the  individuality  differentials  which  are 
different  in  the  corresponding  organs  and  tissues  of  two  individuals.  In  the 
first  mode  of  representation  all  the  organs  and  tissues  of  individual  A  have 
the  factor  a  in  common,  while  in  individual  B  all  organs  and  tissues  have  the 
factor  b  in  common ;  a  is  the  individuality  differential  of  individual  A ;  b  is 
the  individuality  differential  of  individual  B.  In  the  second  mode  of  represen- 
tation each  organ  and  tissue  of  individual  A  has  its  own  specific  factor;  one 
has  a,  the  other  b,  a  third  one  c,  and  so  on,  while  the  organs  and  tissues  of 
individual  B  also  are  distinguished  from  one  another  by  specific  factors,  m,  n, 
o  and  p  .  .  .  but  the  factors  in  individual  A  differ  from  those  of  individual  B ; 
the  factors  a,  b,  c  and  d  ...  in  their  totality  represent  the  individuality  differ- 
ential of  individual  A,  while  the  factors  m,  n,  o  and  p  ...  in  their  totality 
represent  the  individuality  differential  of  individual  B.  According  to  the 
second  mode  of  representation  each  organ  and  tissue  differential  of  an  in- 
dividual possesses  its  own  index  of  individuality,  and  every  organ  and  tissue 
would  possess  a  secondary  or  accessory  individuality  differential.  According 
to  the  first  mode  of  representation  the  individuality  differential  attached  to 
each  organ  and  tissue  of  individual  A  would  be  the  same,  and  those  attached 
to  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  organs  and  tissues  of  individual  B 
would  be  identical ;  these  individuality  differentials  would  correspond  to  the 
primary  individuality  differentials. 

It  will  be  necessary  to  decide  between  these  two  possibilities.  If  we  adopt 
the  first  mode  of  representation,  the  various  tissue  constituents,  lymphocytes, 
fibroblasts,  blood  vessels,  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  would  react  against 
all  the  constituent  parts  of  individual  A  in  about  the  same  manner,  because 
these  parts  have  the  same  factor  in  common.  The  same  applies  to  constituent 
parts  of  individual  B.  But  if  we  adopt  the  second  interpretation,  each  of  these 
tissue  constituents  would  have  to  remember — to  speak  metaphorically — an 
endless  number  of  tissue  and  organ  factors  which  are  attached  to  the  con- 
stituents of  its  own  body  and  would  have  to  distinguish  these  from  a  multi- 
plicity of  tissue  and  organ  factors  possessed  by  a  different  individual.  Corres- 
pondingly, the  blood  serum  of  individual  A  would  be  favorable  to  all  the  con- 
stituent parts  of  individual  A,  and  would  be  less  favorable  to  all  the  consti- 
tuent parts  of  individual  B,  because  the  factor  a,  or  a  factor  correlated  with  a, 
in  the  blood  serum  of  individual  A  would  be  adapted  to  the  tissue  and  organ 
factor  a  of  individual  A,  and  would  be  less  favorable  to  factor  b  of  individual 
B.  The  second  concept  would  only  with  great  difficulty  explain  these  specific 


INTRODUCTION  17 

reactions  between  the  tissue  constituents  and  the  blood  serum  of  the  host  and 
the  transplant.  We  may  then  conclude  that  each  organ  and  tissue  of  individual 
A  has  in  common  a  chemical  factor  which  differs  from  the  corresponding 
factor  in  individual  B ;  but  in  addition,  certain  organs  and  tissues  may  possess 
accessory  or  secondary  individuality  differentials,  which  are  peculiar  to  these 
organs  and  tissues. 

The  individuals  among  the  higher  organisms  possess,  then,  two  kinds  of 
adaptive  mechanisms :  the  first  one  is  that  represented  by  the  functioning  and 
interaction  of  tissues  and  organs  within  the  individual,  and  the  second  is  based 
on  the  fact  that  the  tissues  and  organs  in  the  same  organism  possess  the  same 
individuality  and  species  differential,  and  that  other  individuals  or  species 
carry  different  organismal  differentials  which  are  graded  according  to  the 
phylogenetic  relationship.  In  consequence  of  this  functional  and  structural 
constitution,  very  specific  relationships  have  developed  within  the  individual 
organism  and  between  the  various  inidviduals  within  the  same  species,  genus, 
order  and  class.  These  intricate  and  complex  specificities  of  both  the  mosaic 
and  essential  type  in  their  totality  constitute  the  characteristic  feature  of  the 
individual. 

However,  within  the  functioning  organism,  as  well  as  in  the  relations  be- 
tween different  individuals,  the  organ  and  tissue  specificities  are  more  obvious 
than  the  individuality  differentials,  the  effects  of  which  are  of  a  more  subtle 
nature.  Also,  in  the  sphere  of  social-psychical  relations  it  is  the  function  of 
organs,  above  all,  the  nervous  system  and  the  endocrines,  which  appears  as  the 
significant  element.  Yet,  the  individual  organism  is  an  integrated  whole  and 
changes  in  one  organ  and  tissue  are  followed  as  a  rule  by  changes  in  other 
organs  and  tissues.  This  applies  also  to  those  organ  and  tissue  modifications 
which  occur  during  the  process  of  ageing  and  disease,  and  also  to  interactions 
between  organs  which  concern  primarily  vegetative  functions,  as  well  as  those 
which  control  the  psychical-social  activities,  and  both  of  these  two  latter  kinds 
of  processes  are  linked  together.  Ever}7  change  in  a  part  of  an  individual  affects 
the  individual  as  a  whole,  although  different  types  of  interferences  may  differ 
in  their  effects  on  other  parts  of  the  organism  and  on  the  individual  as  a  whole. 

Individuality,  especially  its  social-psychical  aspect,  entered  the  experience 
of  man  in  very  early  periods  of  history;  it  helped  to  shape  tradition  and  was 
one  of  its  important  components,  and  as  such  it  took  part  in  orienting  the  rules 
of  conduct  and  of  law.  Gradually,  under  its  influence,  philosophical  systems 
and  various  metaphysical  concepts  arose.  But  it  was  only  during  the  19th. 
century  that  the  concept  of  individuality  was  fully  dissociated  from  its  prac- 
tical social  implications  and  that  it  began  to  be  considered  a  biological  problem; 
from  then  on  observations  and  experiments  in  various  fields  of  biology  have 
contributed  to  its  analysis  and  more  definite  problems  concerning  the  in- 
dividual and  individuality  were  formulated.  We  shall  here  record  a  few  of  the 
principal  contributions  concerning  the  biological  aspect  of  individuality. 

The  botanist,  Naegeli,  conceived  of  a  substance  peculiar  to  each  individual 
or  species  and  he  distinguished  it  from  other  less  important  constituents  of 
the  living  matter  as  the  idioplasm.  It  served  as  the  carrier  of  the  characteristics 


18  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  were  inheritable  and  transmitted  from  generation  to  generation.  The 
botanist,  Strassburger,  and  the  zoologist,  O.  Hertwig,  localized  this  hereditary 
substance  in  the  nucleus.  Subsequently,  based  on  the  work  of  Mendel  and  of 
those  who  rediscovered  and  continued  his  investigations,  the  idioplasm  became 
more  sharply  defined  and  transformed  into  sets  of  discrete  units,  the  genes, 
which  are  contained  in  the  female  and  the  male  germ  cells,  and  especially  in 
the  chromosomes  of  the  cell  nucleus.  But  in  addition  to  these  genes  located  in 
the  chromosomes,  also  constituents  of  the  egg  cytoplasm  were  considered  as 
determiners  of  the  distinctive  features  of  the  organism,  and  some  geneticists 
(Correns,  v.  Wettstein  and  Kuhn)  have  assumed  that  genes,  equivalant  to 
those  situated  in  the  chromosomes,  may  also  exist  in  the  cytoplasm  of  the  egg. 

During  the  second  half  of  the  last  century  certain  observations  of  surgeons, 
who  grafted  tissues,  pointed  to  a  fargoing  specificity  and  individualization  in 
the  tissues  comprising  the  higher  organisms.  The  early  experiments  of  the 
French  surgeon,  Oilier,  showed  that  only  autotransplanted  bone  was  able  to 
survive.  Later  experiments  with  skin  and  various  other  organs  or  tissues,  such 
as  ovaries,  and  also  with  benign  tumors,  indicated  that  while  homoiotrans- 
plantation  might  perhaps  succeed,  autotransplantation  was  more  favorable. 
Yet,  towards  the  end  of  the  last  century  biologists  found  that  the  joining  to- 
gether of  parts  of  embryos,  as  well  as  various  kinds  of  homoiotransplantations 
of  invertebrate  and  lower  vertebrate  tissues,  may  give  good  results,  and  that 
even  heterotransplantations  were  successful  under  certain  conditions.  Not- 
withstanding the  experiences  mentioned  above,  in  the  transplantation  of 
tissues  in  adult  mammals  no  sharp  distinction,  as  a  rule,  was  made  between 
the  results  of  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation.  This  was  true  even  of  the 
work  of  Reverdin  and  Thiersch,  who  introduced  skin-grafting  into  surgery 
for  therapeutic  purposes.  While,  as  stated,  some  of  these  observations  sug- 
gested that  biochemical  differences  might  exist  between  different  individuals, 
including  those  belonging  to  the  same  species,  on  the  whole,  the  differences 
between  species  were  stressed  rather  than  the  differences  between  individuals, 
and  it  was  only  within  the  last  thirty-five  or  forty  years  that  the  distinctions 
existing  between  the  tissues  of  different  individuals  of  the  same  species  re- 
ceived more  attention. 

In  the  meantime,  discoveries  in  biochemistry,  comparative  anatomy  and 
embryology  had  led  to  a  further  analysis  of  the  specific  structure  of  organisms. 
The  biochemist,  Huppert,  in  1895,  in  a  lecture  on  the  persistence  of  species 
characters,  referred  also  to  the  differences  which,  according  to  Rollett,  existed 
between  the  hemoglobins  of  different  species  as  regards  their  elementary 
composition,  solubility  and  shape  of  crystals.  He  concluded  that  not  only  the 
chemical  constitution  of  various  substances  differs  in  different  species,  but 
also  that  the  metabolism  of  these  substances  is  distinct  and  characteristic  of 
these  species.  Four  years  later  Rabl,  apparently  under  the  influence  of  Hup- 
pert's  suggestions,  discussed  the  differences  in  the  microscopic  structure  of 
homologous  tissues  in  different  species.  While  the  histologic  structure  of  the 
liver  could  not  be  distinguished,  it  was  discovered  that  the  lens  of  the  eye 
differed  in  different  species.  This  difference  was  maintained  during  the  various 


INTRODUCTION  19 

stages  of  development  and  also  throughout  life.  Furthermore,  the  organ- 
forming,  germinal  areas  of  His,  and  the  cells  which  compose  them,  were  ob- 
served to  be  specific  in  their  form  and  in  the  possession  of  organ-specific  sub- 
stances, and  His  traced  this  specificity  back  to  the  germ  layers,  to  the  blastula, 
and,  in  the  end,  to  the  different  parts  of  the  unsegmented  egg.  It  is  this 
specificity  to  which  he  attributed  the  differences  in  the  embryonal  develop- 
ment of  different  species.  Accordingly,  Rabl  and,  in  particular,  Conklin  were 
able  to  follow  the  development  of  organs  from  the  egg  through  the  first  seg- 
mentations and  through  later  stages  to  the  complete  organism ;  protoplasmic 
movements  and  the  character  of  mitoses  were  found  to  correspond  to  the 
specific  structure  of  the  species.  Rabl  concluded  that  the  specific  characteristics 
of  the  organism,  or  rather  of  the  species,  as  a  whole,  determine  the  specific 
features  of  all  the  organism's  component  parts — its  organs,  tissues  and  in- 
dividual cells.  In  the  discussion  of  this  investigator  we  find,  therefore,  already 
a  suggestion  that  besides  the  differences  in  the  organs  and  tissues  which  dis- 
tinguish different  parts  of  the  individuals  as  a  species,  and  even  different  parts 
in  the  unsegmented  ova,  there  is  something  in  the  species  as  such  which 
determines  its  characteristic  development  in  both  the  structural  and  chemical 
aspects.  This  species  peculiarity  became  manifest  also  in  transplantations; 
homoiotransplantations  as  a  rule  succeed,  while  heterotransplantations  are 
unsuccessful.  It  is  evident  also  in  blood  transfusions,  which  may  be  considered 
as  modified  transplantations. 

Oscar  Hertwig  named  the  factor  which  made  homoiotransplantation  possi- 
ble, but  which  caused  incompatibility  of  heterogenous  parts  of  organisms, 
"vegetative"  affinity,  and  contrasted  it  with  "sexual"  affinity  which  was  re- 
sponsible for  successful  fertilization.  He  believed  that  in  plants  as  well  as  in 
animals  vegetative  and  sexual  affinity  are  similar  in  their  manifestation  and 
are  due  to  the  same  underlying  factors.  These  suggestions  of  Hertwig  were 
taken  up  later  by  W.  Schultz,  when  he  tried  to  prove  the  parallelism  between 
hybridizability  and  transplantability  in  the  tissues  of  vertebrates.  However, 
as  we  shall  see  later,  while  a  certain  parallelism  is  noticeable  between  these  two 
processes,  there  are  also  some  marked  differences. 

It  is  noteworthy  that  the  concepts  of  Naegeli  and  Hertwig  related  mainly 
to  species,  not  to  individuals.  In  the  meantime,  towards  the  end  of  the  last 
century,  the  development  of  the  new  science  of  immunology  had  set  in,  but  it 
was  likewise  primarily  concerned  with  species  differences,  and  only  sec- 
ondarily and  somewhat  later,  with  differences  between  individuals.  But  the 
investigators  in  the  field  of  transplantation  and  immunity  influenced,  also, 
some  biologists,  as  is  noticeable  in  the  writing  of  Fick,  who  in  1907  added  to 
the  concept  of  the  species  plasma  that  of  an  individual  plasma.  The  fertilized 
egg  of  one  individual  was  assumed  to  differ  from  those  of  all  other  individuals 
of  a  certain  species  in  regard  to  the  character  of  its  organ-forming  substances ; 
however,  a  distinction  was  made  between  the  living  protoplasm,  in  which 
these  specificities  applied,  and  the  trophoplasm,  which  represents  merely  food 
and  structural  material,  and  which  was  less  specific  or  nonspecific.  It  was 
recognized  that  the  living  protoplasm  consists  essentially  of  protein.  Each 


20  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

organ-forming  substance  has  individual  peculiarities  which  depend  upon  the 
presence  of  special  chemical  groups  or  on  stereoisomeric  groups  in  these  pro- 
teins, but  it  was  not  considered  probable  that  this  specificity  was  based  on  the 
existence  of  giant  protein  molecules,  which  Pfliiger,  and  later  Verworn, 
identified  with  the  living  protoplasm.  It  may  be  added  that  Herbst  subse- 
quently attributed  individual  differences  to  sidechains  or  smaller  radicles  of 
these  complex  substances  rather  than  to  the  characteristic  structure  of  giant 
protein  molecules  as  a  whole.  However,  Fick  did  not  interpret  the  individual 
specificity  of  an  egg  as  due  to  a  single  specific  substance,  but  to  the  sum  of 
peculiarities  in  the  different  organ-forming  substances  in  the  egg,  which  latter 
had  been  postulated  as  early  as  1880  by  the  botanist  Sachs.  Similarly,  the 
individual  plasmas  of  the  spermatozoon  and  of  the  unfertilized  ovum  were 
held  to  be  united  in  the  fertilized  ovum,  but  this  combination  was  thought  to 
lead  not  merely  to  a  summation  of  the  properties  of  these  plasmas,  but  to  a 
new  specificity.  The  individuality  of  the  egg  represented  thus  a  mosaic  of 
individual  peculiarities  in  the  organ-forming  substances,  and  the  individual 
plasma  of  Fick  is  therefore  quite  distinct  from  the  concept  of  the  individuality 
differential.  In  the  first  place  it  refers  to  the  constitution  of  the  egg  and  not 
to  the  differentiated  and  integrated  individual,  and,  insofar,  it  might  corre- 
spond to  precursor  substances  of  the  individuality  differentials.  But  it  differs 
from  the  concept  of  the  individuality  differential  in  that  it  represents  the 
peculiarities  of  the  mosaic  of  organs  and  tissues,  or  of  their  precursors,  the 
organ-forming  substances  of  the  individual  rather  than  those  of  a  substance 
which  is  common  to  all  of  these  organs  and  tissues.  Subsequently  Correns  re- 
stricted the  meaning  of  the  "individual  plasma"  of  Fick  and  substituted  for 
it  the  specific  plasma  of  pure  lines  in  the  sense  of  Johannsen.  However,  it 
is  clear  that  in  the  higher  organisms  which  propagate  by  fortuitous  cross- 
fertilization  such  pure  lines  do  not  exist  and  transplantation  experiments 
indicate  that  among  the  higher  classes  of  animals  pieces  of  skin  of  different 
individuals  differ  from  one  another.  As  far  as  we  know  now,  the  results  of 
homoiotransplantation  are  never  quite  the  same  as  those  of  autotransplantation. 

We  see,  then,  that  Fick's  concept  of  "individual"  referred  to  organ  speci- 
ficity, to  inherited  peculiarities  of  organs  or  their  differentials.  This  appears 
also  to  be  the  concept  of  G.  Jaeger,  who  many  years  previously  had  postu- 
lated differences  in  the  chemical  constitution  of  individuals  belonging  to  the 
same  species  on  the  basis  of  differences  in  scents,  which  may  serve  to  dis- 
tinguish individuals  and  species.  This  kind  of  specificity  concerns  individual 
differences  in  certain  tissues  and  not  something  which  is  the  same  in  all  the 
tissues  of  an  individual. 

Likewise  the  term  "homology,"  as  used  by  the  comparative  anatomist 
Gegenbaur,  expresses  the  similarities  in  the  phylogenetic  evolution  of  corre- 
sponding organ  systems.  Both  comparative  anatomy  and  paleontology  con- 
sider the  similarity  inherent  in  the  organs  in  different  species  as  an  indicator 
of  their  phylogenetic  relationship,  and  they  trace  evolution  by  means  of  these 
homologies  found  in  fossils  and  in  still  existing  species.  In  these  instances  we 
have  again  to  deal  with  organ  specificities  and  therefore  with  something 
distinct  from  the  organismal  differentials. 


INTRODUCTION  21 

To  return  to  the  individuality  in  the  structure  and  chemical  constitution  of 
the  egg,  the  conceptions  of  Fick  and  others  evidently  do  not  localize  these 
characteristics  in  the  nuclear  genes,  but  in  the  cytoplasm.  There  can  be  no 
doubt  at  the  present  time  as  to  the  significance  of  the  chromosomes  and  genes, 
or  other  subdivisions  of  chromosomes,  and  of  the  arrangement  of  the  latter 
in  the  chromosomes,  for  the  determination  of  species  and  individual  characters 
although  differences  of  interpretation  exist  as  to  the  mode  of  their  repre- 
sentation in  the  chromosome.  There  is  further  no  agreement,  as  yet,  among 
investigators  as  to  the  importance  which  must  be  attached  to  other  factors 
in  addition  to  the  chromosomes.  We  have  referred  already  to  the  views  of 
Correns,  von  Wettstein  and  Kuhn,  who  assume  that  also  the  cytoplasm 
carries  genes  which  determine  development ;  this  conclusion  was  based  on  the 
results  of  species  hybridizations  in  which  reciprocal  combinations  gave  differ- 
ent results  and  in  which  an  influence  of  the  maternal  germ  cells  was  noticeable, 
in  accordance  with  the  views  of  Jacques  Loeb  (1916),  who  had  restricted  the 
Mendelian  mode  of  heredity  to  certain  individual  characteristcs  of  organs 
and  tissues,  while  he  believed  that  species  characteristics  are  determined  by 
the  cytoplasmic  structure  of  the  ovum.  In  a  similar  way  von  Wettstein  assumes 
that  the  hereditary  substance  which  is  localized  in  plasma  differs  in  its  signifi- 
cance from  that  of  the  genes  of  the  chromosomes.  He  suggests  that  it  is  the 
former  which  is  the  real  substratum  of  the  developmental  processes,  whereas 
chromosomal  genes  and  environmental  factors  control  and  direct  the  processes 
which  are  dependent  upon  the  structure  of  the  cytoplasm. 

However,  the  majority  of  geneticists  at  the  present  time  hold  that  the  genes 
are  the  substratum  which  determines  the  hereditary  transmission  not  only  of 
the  individual  but  also  of  the  species,  genus  and  class  characteristics  from 
generation  to  generation,  and  that  the  genes  impress  upon  the  cytoplasm  of 
the  ovum,  by  their  interaction  with  the  latter,  the  structure  which  is  specific 
for  each  species.  We  would,  accordingly,  have  to  assume  that  the  individual, 
species,  genus,  order  and  class  differentials,  in  general  the  organismal  differ- 
entials, are  preformed  in  both  egg  and  spermatozoa  and  that,  thus,  precursors 
of  the  organismal  differentials  exist  in  these  germ  cells,  the  nature  of  which 
is  determined  by  the  genes  of  the  egg  and  spermatozoon.  However,  whether 
all  the  genes  participate  equally  in  the  determination  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials, or  whether  some  of  the  genes  predominate  in  this  function  over  others, 
is  not  known.  Inasmuch  as  no  difference  has  been  found  between  the  male  and 
female  sex  in  regard  to  the  transmission  and  possession  of  the  organismal 
differentials  or  their  precursors,  it  may  be  assumed  that  the  Y  chromosome, 
which  is  concerned  with  the  sex  differentiation  of  the  fertilized  egg,  does  not 
play  an  essential  role  in  the  determination  of  the  constitution  of  these  pre- 
cursors. This  would  accord  with  the  indications  which  exist  that  the  Y  chromo- 
some does  not  as  a  rule  carry  demonstrable  alleles  of  sexlinked  genes,  at  least 
not  many  of  them.  This  interpretation  of  the  nature  of  the  precursors  of  the 
organismal  differentials  is  the  most  probable  one,  because  egg  and  spermato- 
zoon, as  far  as  we  know,  contribute  equally  to  the  constitution  of  these  pre- 
cursors. In  regard  to  the  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  however,  which 
characterize  and  distinguish  the  various  organs  and  tissues  in  the  same  indi- 


22  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

vidual,  species,  and  so  on,  these  depend  in  all  probability  on  the  structure  of 
the  egg  and  on  organ- forming  substances  which  are  distributed  in  a  definite 
and  characteristic  manner  in  the  egg  of  each  species,  and  on  the  interaction 
of  the  organ- forming  substance  with  the  nuclear  genes,  in  accordance  with 
the  fact  that  genes  have  a  specific  relation  to  organ  peculiarities  of  individuals 
or  species. 

There  exist,  then,  in  the  fertilized  egg  not  only  the  precursors  of  the  organis- 
mal  differentials  but  also  those  of  the  various  organ  and  tissue  differentials, 
which  latter,  singly  or  in  their  totality,  likewise  characterize  an  individual  or 
species  and  which  constitute  the  mosaic  parts  which  have  served  in  the  study 
of  Mendetlian  heredity. 

Comparative  anatomy,  embryology,  genetics  and  biochemistry  have  thus 
contributed  to  the  analysis  of  what  may  now  be  designated  as  organismal  and, 
in  particular,  as  individuality  differentials  on  the  one  hand,  and  organ  and 
tissue  differentials  on  the  other  hand.  Furthermore,  at  about  the  time  when 
biochemists,  anatomists  and  embryologists  began  to  discuss  the  problem  of  the 
chemical  and  structural  basis  of  species  differences,  an  important  additional 
stimulus  to  the  analysis  of  this  problem  was  given  and  new  viewpoints  were 
revealed  by  the  development  of  immunology.  Following  the  discoveries  of 
Pasteur,  Behring,  Roux,  Buchner,  Ehrlich,  Metchnikoff,  Gruber,  Kraus  and 
others  concerning  the  production  of  an  active  and  passive  immunity  against 
microorganisms  and  their  toxins,  and  the  mechanisms  underlying  this  im- 
munity, it  was  found  by  Bordet,  Tschistowitch  and  other  investigators,  that 
similar  immune  reactions  can  be  called  forth  against  bodyfluids  and  cells  of 
organisms  belonging  to  different  species.  As  a  result  of  this  immunization 
various  kinds  of  antibodies,  such  as  precipitins,  agglutinins,  hemolysins  and 
complement  fixing  substances  are  produced,  corresponding  to  the  antibacterial 
and  antitoxic  substances  which  had  previously  been  discovered.  These  find- 
ings suggested  the  possibility  of  differentiating  different  species  by  means  of 
such  antibodies.  If  blood  sera  or  other  substances  of  a  protein  nature  from 
various  species  were  injected  repeatedly  into  rabbits  or  other  animals,  immune 
sera  were  obtained  against  the  antigens  used.  The  interactions  of  these  immune 
sera  with  the  antigen  and  with  other  analogous  substances  obtained  from 
nearly  related  or  more  distant  species  were  then  compared  and  the  results  of 
these  tests  served  as  indicators  of  the  relationship  between  the  various  species 
(Grunbaum,  Nuttall). 

In  a  similar  way  the  interaction  of  performed  bodyfluids  and  cells  derived 
from  different  species  was  tested  directly  (Friedenthal).  Landsteiner  (1901) 
studied  the  interaction  of  individual  human  sera  and  erythrocytes  in  order  to 
find  differences  between  different  individuals;  instead,  he  discovered  the  ex- 
istence of  four  different  blood,  groups  into  which  human  beings  can  be  ar- 
ranged. Hamburger  (1901),  and  later,  Abderhalden,  pointed  out  that  proteins 
derived  from  a  foreign  species  are  toxic  if  introduced  parenterally  and  that  it 
is  the  function  of  the  gastrointestinal  organs  to  split  these  proteins  into  simpler 
constituents,  which  are  no  longer  characteristic  of  the  species  from  which  they 
were  derived  and  which  at  the  same  time  have  lost  much  of  their  toxic  char- 


INTRODUCTION  23 

acter.  The  tissues  of  the  intestines  and  various  other  organs  then  build  up 
from  these  split  products  new  complex  proteins  which  possess  the  specific 
species  character  of  the  new  host.  Hamburger  (1903)  assumed  that  special 
chemical  groups  characterize  the  different  proteins  of  a  certain  species  and 
that  these  groups  are  common  to  the  various  tissues  of  the  same  organism. 
Similar  were  the  conceptions  of  Obermayer  and  Pick,  who  at  this  time  had 
begun  their  investigations  into  the  chemical  factors  which  determine  the 
species-specificity  of  proteins.  Hamburger  extended  these  ideas  also  to  in- 
dividuals and  he  held  that  the  proteins  of  each  individual  have  a  chemical 
characteristic  in  common,  which  differs  from  that  of  every  other  individual 
belonging  to  the  same  species.  Subsequently  it  was  found  that  in  addition  to 
the  proteins,  also  carbohydrates  and  lipoids,  as  well  as  other  simpler  sub- 
stances, if  they  are  combined  with  foreign  proteins  (Landsteiner)  can  serve 
as  antigens  which  give  rise  to  specific  immune  bodies,  and  that  these  non- 
protein substances  as  such  may  interact  in  a  specific  way  with  these  antibodies. 
It  had  thus  become  possible  to  differentiate  by  means  of  immune  reactions 
between  substances  characteristic  of  different  species  and  thus  to  obtain  tests 
for  species  differentials ;  also,  in  a  few  cases,  to  differentiate  by  these  means 
even  between  different  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species  (Ehrlich  and 
Morgenroth,  Todd). 

Furthermore,  a  distinction  can  be  made  in  this  way,  not  only  between  species 
differentials  but  also  between  the  characteristic  constituents  of  different 
organs  and  tissues  within  the  same  organism  (organ  differentials)  ;  and  it  was 
found  that,  as  a  rule,  it  is  necessary  to  combine  the  organ  differentials  of  one 
species  with  a  strange  species  differential  in  order  to  produce  organ-specific, 
immune  substances  ;  these  combined  antigens  are  an  expression  of  the  intimate 
relations  which  exist  also  embryologically  and  genetically  between  these  two 
types  of  differentials  or  their  precursors.  In  certain  protein  substances  both 
species-specific  and  organ-,  tissue-,  or  substance-specific  groups  may  be 
present. 

It  has  been  mentioned  above  that  observations  made  in  the  grafting  of 
tissues  led  to  the  conclusion  that  constitutional  differences  may  exist  between 
individuals  of  the  same  species ;  we  have  referred  already  to  the  work  of 
Oilier,  who  in  the  second  half  of  the  last  century  found  differences  between 
the  readiness  with  which  periosteum  of  one  animal  can  be  transplanted  to  the 
same  individual  and  to  other  individuals.  Similar  differences  were  noted  also 
in  the  transplantation  of  other  organs,  above  all,  in  the  skin-grafting  which 
Thiersch  perfected ;  according  to  Schoene,  Thiersch  had  suggested  biochemical 
characteristics  as  the  cause  of  these  differences.  Somewhat  later,  Knauer 
found  that  also  in  the  case  of  ovaries,  autotransplantation  was  more  successful 
than  homoiotransplantation.  Between  1901  and  1907  we  carried  out,  in  rats 
and  dogs,  several  series  of  transplantations  of  mammary  gland  adenoma, 
which  were  intermediate  in  character  between  normal  and  cancerous  tissues, 
and  found  that  while  autotransplanted  pieces  continued  to  live  and  in  some 
cases  proliferated,  homoiotransplanted  pieces  died. 

We  recognized  three  factors  as  responsible  for  this  result:  (1)  the  exist- 


24  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ence  of  certain  conditions  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  which  determine  the 
suitability  of  the  animal's  own  autogenous  bodyfluids  and  the  unsuitability  of 
homoiogenous  bodyfluids  for  the  transplant.  This  conception  implies  a  factor 
in  common  to  the  bodyfluids  and  to  the  cells  of  each  individual.  In  subsequent 
investigations  to  which  we  have  referred  already  also  Todd  (1913)  recognized 
the  existence  of  a  factor  common  to  and  characteristic  of  all  the  cells  of  an 
individual ;  but  according  to  this  investigator  in  near  relatives  this  factor 
might  be  the  same.  (2)  Growth  factors  inherent  in  the  transplant,  and 
(3)  extraneous  growth  factors  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  similar 
to  those  given  off  by  the  ovary  under  certain  conditions.  These  observations 
were  subsequently  confirmed  by  Borrel,  Ribbert,  and  they  were  extended  to 
malignant  tumors  by  Bashford  and  Tyzzer.  In  1909,  Borst  and  Enderlen  re- 
ferred the  difference  between  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation  of  blood  vessels 
to  "biochemical  differences"  between  individuals  of  the  same  species.  How- 
ever, as  we  shall  show  later,  these  "biochemical  differences"  are  not  identical 
with  individuality  and  species  differentials.  With  Addison,  we  extended  our 
investigations  as  to  the  effect  of  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  tissues  be- 
longing to  different  species  on  the  fate  of  the  transplants,  and  Schoene  studied 
the  influence  of  family  relationship  on  transplantability.  In  the  following 
years,  W.  Schultz  analyzed  the  relation  between  hybridizability  and  trans- 
plantability of  skin.  In  the  meantime  tumor  transplantations  had  been  carried 
out  on  a  large  scale,  and  while  at  first,  especially  in  the  work  of  Jensen  and 
Ehrlich,  problems  of  immunity  played  a  prominent  role  in  the  analysis  of  con- 
ditions which  determine  the  result  of  transplantations,  we  and,  subsequently, 
Peyton  Rous  used  the  transplantation  of  tumors  as  a  method  for  studying 
tissue  growth  in  general  and  we  emphasized  the  close  relations  which  exist 
between  the  growth  of  normal  tissues  and  of  tumors. 

The  writer,  in  association  with  Addison,  Myers,  Hesselberg  and  others, 
noted  the  significance  of  lymphocytes,  and  also  of  fibroblasts  and  vascular 
endothelia,  in  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  transplant.  In  the  case  of 
tumors,  it  is  especially  the  various  investigations  of  Murphy  and  his  collabora- 
tors which  subsequently  showed  the  significance  of  lymphocytes  in  the  re- 
sistance of  animals  against  inoculated  pieces  of  cancers.  In  normal  tissues  we 
found  that  the  time  of  appearance  and  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  reac- 
tion developing  around  a  transplant  in  combination  with  connective-tissue  and 
blood-vessel  reactions,  could  be  used  in  testing  quantitatively  the  genetic  re- 
lationship between  host  and  donor.  We  formulated  thus,  in  the  following 
years,  the  concept  of  organisnial  differentials,  and  we  analyzed  the  genetic 
relationship  between  host  and  transplant  and  the  fate  of  the  latter.  Qosely 
inbred  strains  of  mice  were  used  for  the  analysis  of  the  factors  determining 
the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors,  especially  by  Little  and  his  collaborators, 
and  we  extended  use  of  such  strains  to  the  analysis  of  the  organismal  differen- 
tials of  normal  tissues.  There  developed  hence,  step  by  step,  mainly  as  the 
result  of  greatly  varied  transplantations  of  normal  tissues  in  which  simultane- 
ous multiple  and  successive  transplantations  proved  of  special  value,  the  con- 
ceptions of  various  kinds  of  specificity  in  tissue  and  organ  relations,  of  the 
autogenous  equilibrium  of  the  organism  and  of  tissue  reactions  as  a  test  for 


INTRODUCTION  25 

individuality,  of  the  contrast  between  mosaic  and  essential  individuality,  of  the 
phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development  of  the  organismal  and,  in  particu- 
lar, of  the  individuality  differentials  which  we  have  mentioned  in  the  first  part 
of  this  chapter,  and  which  will  be  discussed  in  greater  detail  in  the  following 
chapters. 

At  first  various  fields  of  investigations  relating  to  the  biological  basis  of 
individuality,  which  have  been  enumerated  in  the  preceding  discussion,  de- 
veloped separately,  but  gradually  an  interaction  between  these  diverse  lines 
of  investigations  was  established  and  proved  fertile.  In  the  beginning  of  this 
century  it  was  mainly  the  concepts  of  immunology  which  greatly  influenced 
the  study  of  the  transplantation  of  tissues,  but  later  a  reciprocal  influence  be- 
came noticeable  and  during  the  last  fifteen  years  the  analysis  of  individuality 
by  the  method  of  transplantation  has  stimulated  also  the  search  for  individ- 
uality differentials  in  various  antigens  by  immunological  methods. 

In  the  studies  mentioned  so  far,  the  question  of  individuality  and  specificity 
was  considered  from  purely  theoretical  points  of  view.  But  the  requirements 
of  social  life  and  especially  also  the  need  to  sustain  the  health  of  body  and 
mind  of  the  individual  members  of  a  community  and  the  harmonious  relations 
between  those  that  compose  a  social  group,  made  it  necessary  to  face  the 
problem  of  individuality  from  a  somewhat  different  viewpoint.  This  has  led 
to  the  concept  of  "constitution"  as  something  which  is  peculiar  to  individuals 
and  allows  the  classification  of  certain  groups  of  individuals  according  to 
their  reactions  to  various  environmental  conditions.  It  was  observed  that  dif- 
ferent individuals  behaved  differently  in  the  same  environment  and  under  ap- 
parently identical  conditions.  On  this  basis  a  distinction  was  made  between 
the  environmental  factors  and  the  substratum  on  which  the  latter  act.  The 
mode  in  which  the  substratum  responded  to  conditions  in  the  outer  and  also  in 
the  inner  environment,  depended  on  and  revealed  the  constitution  of  this  sub- 
stratum. While  various  characteristic  features  of  a  constitutional  nature  were 
shared  by  a  number  of  individuals,  in  the  totality  of  these  features  each  in- 
dividual was  unique  and  differed  from  every  other  one;  and  it  was  especially 
the  physician  for  whom  these  individual-  and  group-constitutional  differences 
were  of  practical  importance.  Thus  the  concept  "constitution"  developed  in 
response  to  the  needs  of  daily  life,  and  it  accentuated,  as  does  also  the  concept 
"individual,"  the  contrast  between  the  organism  and  the  outer  world.  The 
analysis  of  constitution  is  therefore  another  step  in  the  delineation  of  in- 
dividuality and  personality  from  the  surrounding  world.  It  is  an  attempt  to 
determine  what  in  our  interaction  with  the  living  and  non-living  world  around 
us  is  due  to  ourselves  and  what  is  due  to  the  world  outside  ourselves.  But  here 
great  difficulties  arise  because  of  the  great  complexity  which  exists  in  the 
interaction  between  the  individual  and  the  outer  world,  and  between  the  outer 
and  inner  milieu  of  a  higher  organism. 

However,  through  experiment  and  observation  it  has  been  learned  that 
certain  characteristics  of  an  organism  are  fixed  in  the  germ  cells  and  give  rise 
to  certain  structural,  metabolic  and  functional  conditions  in  the  individual. 
These  inherited  features  represent  the  core  of  his  constitution;  it  is  the  un- 
changeable part  of  it.  But  in  actual  life  it  is  often  very  difficult  or  impossible 


26  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  separate  this  core  from  effects  produced  by  the  environment.  Therefore  the 
physician  especially  is  forced  to  adopt  as  the  definition  of  constitution  not  only 
the  genotype,  the  inherited  part  of  the  individual,  but  also  those  effects  of  the 
environment  which  have  modified  his  mode  of  response  to  environmental 
factors  in  a  more  permanent  way.  But  different  environmental  factors  differ 
greatly  in  their  intensity  and  in  the  perpetuity  of  the  constitutional  changes 
which  they  produce  and  in  the  number  and  imporance  of  the  parts  of  the  or- 
ganism which  they  affect.  All  transitions  exist  in  this  respect  and  no  sharp 
line  of  demarcation  can  be  found  between  various  environmental  factors.  It  is 
particularly  the  nervous  system  which  responds  most  readily  to  the  environ- 
ment in  the  mentally  most  plastic  organism,  man.  Every  thought  and  sugges- 
tion which  he  has  received  produce  an  important  change  in  his  constellation 
as  far  as  his  behavior  is  concerned.  Constitution  thus  becomes  identical  with 
the  constellation  of  an  organism  produced  by  all  kinds  of  inner  and  outer  con- 
ditions, which  regulate  future  reactions;  it  depends  upon  the  condition  of 
organs  or  organ  systems  and  corresponds  therefore  to  the  mosaic  type  of  in- 
dividuality. But  the  term  "constitution"  has  received  a  different  content  under 
different  circumstances ;  it  is  not  sharply  defined,  yet  it  may  serve  as  a  pro- 
visional instrument  in  the  analysis  of  the  reactions  of  an  individual. 

In  the  following  chapters  we  shall  discuss  more  fully  the  different  aspects 
of  individuality,  to  which  we  have  referred  in  this  introductory  review.  In 
the  various  parts  of  this  book  the  following  problems  will  be  discussed : 

Part  I.  The  transplantation  of  tissues  in  higher  organisms  which  fur- 
nishes the  most  delicate  tests  of  individuality  differentials  and  is  the  basis  on 
which  further  theoretical  considerations  have  been  built. 

Part  II.  The  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development  of  individuality 
and  organismal  differentials,  from  the  primitive  to  the  highest  organisms 
and  from  the  egg  to  the  adult  state. 

Part  III.  Conditions  suggesting  or  simulating  the  presence  of  individuali- 
ty differentials  which  exist  in  certain  unicellular  organisms,  either  free- 
living,  such  as  certain  protozoa;  or  representing  parts  of  more  complex 
organisms  and  constituents  of  tissues,  such  as  amoebocytes ;  or  cells  inter- 
mediate between  these  two  types,  as  far  as  their  independence  is  concerned, 
namely,  ova  and  spermatozoa. 

Part  IV.  The  organismal  differentials  of  tumors,  which  represent  modi- 
fied tissues. 

Part  V .  The  role  played  by  organismal  differentials  in  the  maintenance 
of  the  harmony  of  the  organism  as  a  whole,  and  in  the  interaction  of  the 
organs  and  tissues  within  the  organism. 

Part  VI.  Immune  processes  in  their  bearing  on  the  interpretation  of 
organismal  differentials.  Organismal  differentials  as  well  as  organ  differ- 
entials may  function  as  antigens  and  give  rise  to  the  formation  of  immune 
substances. 

Part  VII.  The  relationship  between  the  evolution  of  species  and  organis- 
mal differentials. 

Part  VIII.  The  significance  of  individuality  differentials  in  the  psychical- 
social  field;  it  is  here  that  the  concept  of  individuality  had  its  origin. 


Pi^rf    T  Transplantation  of  Tissues  in  Higher  Vertebrates 

as  a  Method  for  the  Analysis  of  the  Organismal 
Differentials 


Chapter  I 
General  Considerations 

Our  analysis  of  individuality  and  organismal  differentials  is  based 
primarily  on  investigations  into  the  fate  of  transplants  of  normal 
tissues,  and  also  of  tumors,  and  their  genetic  relationship  to  the  host 
in  which  they  live.  In  such  an  analysis  it  will  therefore  be  necessary  to  discuss 
in  more  detail  the  results  we  have  obtained  in  these  experiments,  especially 
in  the  ones  on  which  a  full  report  has  not  as  yet  been  published.  However, 
before  entering  into  a  discussion  of  these  results,  the  following  questions, 
which  relate  to  these  investigations  in  general,  will  be  considered:  (1)  the  aim 
of  these  investigations;  (2)  the  factors  which  have  to  be  taken  into  account 
in  evaluating  the  conclusions,  namely,  a)  the  mode  of  interaction  between  host 
and  transplant  and  the  various  reactions  of  the  host  which  are  induced  by  the 
transplant,  b)  the  differences  existing  between  different  species,  c)  the  differ- 
ences existing  between  different  strains  and  individuals,  d)  the  differences 
existing  between  different  tissues  serving  as  transplants;  (3)  the  methods 
which  best  serve  our  purposes  and  the  variable  factors  which  may  complicate 
the  application  of  these  methods,  and  (4)  the  possible  errors  which  have  to  be 
considered  in  these  experiments. 

1.  The  aim  of  these  investigations  is  the  analysis  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials of  individuals,  families,  strains  and  species.  We  are  not  primarily  con- 
cerned with  various  other  problems,  as,  for  instance,  the.  conditions  under 
which  tissues  survive  and  the  establishment  of  the  methods  most  suitable  to 
accomplish  their  survival ;  the  analysis  of  polarity  in  the  structure  of  various 
organisms  and  tissues,  and  the  question  of  the  factors  which  determine  the 
growth  of  the  grafts  or  the  fate  of  pigmented  tissues.  Only  in  so  far  as  such 
problems  aid  in  the  analysis  of  the  organismal  differentials  and,  in  particular, 
of  the  individuality  differentials,  are  they  to  be  considered.  But  these  investi- 
gations, in  addition  to  their  primary  objective,  contribute  also  secondarily  to 
our  knowledge  of  tissue  reactions  in  general,  of  factors  which  are  active  in 
pigment  formation,  and  to  our  understanding  of  the  potential  immortality  of 
tissues.  In  a  wider  sense,  our  interest  centers  in  the  phylogenetic  and  onto- 
genetic evolution  of  the  organismal  differentials,  in  the  relation  of  these 
differentials  to  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  and  to  the  psychical  differen- 
tiation and  the  social  life  of  individuals. 

2.  (a)  As  to  the  mode  of  interaction  between  host  and  transplant,  the  fol- 
lowing factors  have  to  be  considered :  ( 1 )  The  effect  which  the  bodyfluids  of 
the  host  exert  on  the  transplanted  tissues ;  (2)  the  effect  which  the  connective 
tissue  and  blood  vessels  of  the  host  have  on  the  state  of  the  graft;  (3)  the 

27 


28  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

significance  of  the  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  for  the  fate 
of  the  transplant;  (4)  the  distant  actions  which,  according  to  Blumenthal,  the 
individuality  differentials  exert  on  the  host  after  these  differential  substances 
have  entered  the  host  circulation.  The  connective-tissue  and  blood-vessel  reac- 
tions occur  at  an  early  phase  following  transplantation  and  the  character  of 
these  reactions  is  usually  determined  within  the  first  two  weeks.  The  lym- 
phocytic reaction,  as  a  rule,  begins  within  the  second  week,  but  in  some  cases 
it  may  exert  its  full  effect  only  at  subsequent  periods,  and  in  certain  instances, 
this  reaction  may  appear  and  increase  during  the  later  phases  of  the  inter- 
action between  host  and  transplant.  The  lymphocytes  usually  are  indicative  of 
finer  differences  between  the  individuality  differentials ;  they  are  not  found  in 
any  considerable  numbers  if  there  is  complete  compatibility  between  host  and 
transplant,  and  they  do  not  as  a  rule  appear  in  very  large  masses  if  the  incom- 
patibility between  host  and  graft  is  so  great  that  the  metabolism  of  the  latter 
is  seriously  affected  within  seven  to  ten  days  following  transplantation.  But 
even  in  heterotransplantation  these  cells  may  accumulate  after  some  time  in 
the  periphery  of  the  injured  graft.  Polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are  seen  in 
small  numbers  soon  after  the  grafting  of  a  piece  of  tissue,  owing  to  circula- 
tory disturbances  and  perhaps  also  to  the  presence  of  necrotic  tissue,  which  is 
found  under  these  conditions ;  but  they  accumulate  in  larger  numbers  usually 
only  around  and  inside  of  heterogenous  transplants.  In  the  distant  reactions, 
lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are  activated  in  the  circula- 
tion, under  the  same  conditions  under  which  they  are  activated  locally  around 
the  transplant. 

(b)  Differences  in  the  mode  of  reaction  against  strange  individuality  dif- 
ferentials exhibited  by  different  species.  While  the  factors  which  are  in- 
volved in  the  struggle  of  an  organism  against  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials are  in  principle  the  same  in  all  the  species  with  which  we  have  worked, 
still,  some  quantitative  variations  exist  in  this  respect.  On  the  whole,  rat  and 
guinea  pig  react  in  a  similar  manner,  although  there  may  be  minor  differences 
in  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction  in  these  species.  There  is,  in  addi- 
tion, a  stronger  tendency  on  the  part  of  the  connective  tissue  to  invade  and 
replace  transplanted  fat  tissue  in  the  guinea  pig  than  in  the  rat.  There  are, 
however,  quite  marked  differences  between  the  reactions  in  the  guinea  pig 
and  rat,  on  the  one  hand,  and  in  the  mouse,  on  the  other.  In  the  mouse,  the 
lymphocytic  and  connective-tissue  reactions  are  in  many  cases  less  prominent 
and  consequently  the  direct  injurious  action  of  the  body  fluids  becomes  more 
prominent.  The  amount  of  surviving  tissue  and  the  state  of  preservation  of 
the  transplanted  cells  are  therefore  largely  indicative  of  the  degree  of  com- 
patibility or  incompatibility  of  the  individuality  (organismal)  differentials  in 
this  species.  However,  the  lymphocytic  and  connective-tissue  reactions  may 
here  also  participate  in  determining  the  fate  of  the  transplants  and  under  cer- 
tain conditions  this  participation  in  the  struggle  is  quite  pronounced  and 
effective.  In  contrast  to  these  species,  in  the  chicken,  in  which  the  relative 
proportion  of  lymphocytes  in  the  circulating  blood  is  higher  than  in  other 
species,  the  local  lymphocytic  reaction  may  be  extremely  strong  even  in  cases 


GENERAL  CONSIDERATIONS  29 

in  which  there  is  only  a  relatively  slight  divergence  in  the  constitution  of  the 
individuality  differentials. 

(c)  There  are  also  differences  in  the  reactions  of  different  strains,  belonging 
to  the  same  species,  against  strange  individuality  differentials.  Such  differ- 
ences might  be  expected  in  the  reactions  between  individuals  from  strains 
which  have  been  inbred  to  different  degrees.  The  less  close  the  inbreeding,  the 
more  severe  will  be  the  average  reaction  between  different  invididuals.  Fur- 
thermore, a  strain  whose  genetic  constitution  differs  markedly  from  that  of 
another  strain  may  be  expected  to  react  strongly  against  individual  mem- 
bers of  the  latter  strain.  But  in  addition,  there  is  some  evidence  that  different 
strains  and  also  different  individuals  are  able  to  react  more  strongly  against 
strange  strains  and  individuals  than  are  others.  Thus,  among  rats  it  seems 
that  Busch  strain  rats  reacted,  on  the  average,  more  severely  against  individ- 
uals belonging  to  various  strains  than  did  strains  of  a  different  origin. 
Furthermore,  among  mice  there  is  some  indication  that  strain  C57  tended  to 
react  more  readily  with  lymphocytic  infiltration  of  a  strange  tissue  than  did 
other  about  equally  inbred  strains.  However,  this  observation  is  at  present 
only  a  preliminary  one;  it  needs  further  study  and  confirmation.  There  are 
also  indications  that  certain  individual  animals  exhibit  a  stronger  reaction  to 
the  tissues  of  various  other  individuals  than  do  other  animals  of  the  same 
strain.  We  must,  therefore,  in  evaluating  jthe  significance  of  certain  reactions 
as  tests  for  the  constitution  of  individuality  differentials,  consider  the  possi- 
bility that  there  exist  some  variations  in  the  strength  of  the  reactions  which 
are  independent  of  the  degree  of  difference  in  the  constitution  of  these  differ- 
entials. 

(d)  As  to  the  differences  in  the  reactions  against  different  tissues,  all 
derived  from  the  same  individual  and  transplanted  into  the  same  host,  these 
are  quite  marked.  Tissues  differ  in  respect  to  their  resistance  to  injurious  con- 
ditions and  therefore  in  their  ability  to  survive  following  transplantation. 
There  are  quantitative  variations  in  this  respect  between  different  types  of 
tissues.  Some,  as  for  instance,  adult  ganglia  cells,  which  are  severely  injured 
by  a  short  interruption  of  oxygen  supply  during  and  following  the  process  of 
transplantation,  cannot  be  successfully  transplanted.  Under  ordinary  condi- 
tions it  is  more  difficult  to  graft,  for  any  length  of  time,  the  adrenal  cortex 
into  a  homoiogenous  individual  than  the  anterior  hypophysis.  Cartilage  and 
perichondrium  are  very  resistant  to  injuries  associated  with  the  process  of 
transplantation ;  they  withstand  also  relatively  successfully  an  attempted  in- 
vasion by  lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue,  although  even  in  this  respect 
differences  exist  between  very  cellular  cartilage  and  cartilage  in  which  the 
intercellular  substance  predominates.  Dense  fibrous  hyaline  tissue  resembles 
to  some  extent  cartilage.  Intermediate  in  their  behavior  following  transplanta- 
tion are  kidney,  fat  tissue,  salivary  glands,  and  some  glands  with  internal 
secretion,  such  as  ovary  and  thyroid ;  and  among  each  of  these  various  organs 
different  constituents  are  graded  in  their  power  of  resistance,  thus  the  ex- 
cretory ducts  are  usually  more  resistant  than  the  specific  functioning  paren- 
chyma. 


30  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

In  the  ovary,  the  larger-sized  follicles  and  corpora  lutea  are  the  most  sensi- 
tive constituents  and  they  are  therefore  the  first  ones  to  be  destroyed  after 
transplantation;  in  other  cases,  the  small-sized  follicles  survive  but  do  not 
develop  to  a  larger  size  if  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant 
are  not  harmonious.  Much  more  resistant  than  follicles  is  the  germinal  epi- 
thelium, which  covers  the  ovary  and  usually  forms  a  cyst  after  transplantation. 
Likewise,  cortical  spindle-cell  connective  tissue  and  medullary  ducts,  as  well 
as  germinal  epithelial  ducts,  and  also  the  epithelium  and  unstriated  mucosa  of 
the  Fallopian  tubes  are  more  frequently  able  to  withstand  the  injurious  effects 
of  homoiotoxin  than  even  the  small  follicles.  Most  often  the  tissue  remaining 
after  destruction  of  all  the  others  are  strands  of  smaller  and  larger  cuboidal 
cells,  which  are  probably  derived  directly  from  the  interstitial  gland,  and  in- 
directly from  the  theca  internal  cells  of  atretic  follicles ;  and  these  cells  may  be 
quite  active  as  phagocytes  and  thus  help  in  the  removal  of  necrotic  or  hemor- 
rhagic material.  It  may  be  remarked  here  that  hemorrhages  occur  in  certain 
transplanted  tissues  and  also  in  some  non-transplanted  organs,  such  as  the 
adrenal  gland,  probably  more  often  than  might  be  expected.  The  characteris- 
tics of  the  ovary  in  the  mouse,  which  we  have  described,  make  this  organ  very 
suitable  for  the  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials. 

Striated  muscle  tissue  is  fairly  resistant  and  can  be  easily  transplanted, 
whereas  bone  marrow  is  a  rather  sensitive  organ  that  readily  perishes.  In  con- 
trast to  ovarian  tissue,  testicle  is  sensitive.  However,  the  power  of  resistance 
of  analogous  tissues  may  differ  in  different  species ;  thus  it  seems  that  ovarian 
structures  are  more  suitable  for  grafting  in  the  rat  and  mouse  than  in  the 
guinea  pig.  Different  tissues  differ  also  in  their  ability  to  grow  after  trans- 
plantation and  also  in  their  mode  of  regeneration,  and  these  growth  processes 
are  inhibited  by  incompatibilities  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  transplant.  Furthermore,  there  seem  to  be  some  differences  in  the  quan- 
tity of  individuality  differential  substances  produced  or  given  off  by  various 
tissues.  Those  possessing  a  very  active  metabolism,  such  as  thyroid,  produce 
these  substances  apparently  in  larger  quantities  than  does  cartilage.  This  con- 
clusion is  suggested  by  the  fact  that  different  tissues  differ  in  the  readiness 
with  which  they  attract  lymphocytes,  and  it  may  be  assumed  that  the  accumu- 
lation of  lymphocytes  is  an  indicator  of  the  amount  of  active  individuality 
differential  substances. 

^^r.  As  to  the  methods  which  are  most  useful  in  the  analysis  of  the  individu- 
ality differentials,  the  place  of  transplantation  is  important.  It  is  necessary 
to  select  a  place  sufficiently  large  for  the  simultaneous  insertion  of  multiple 
grafts,  or,  in  other  cases,  for  the  serial  transplantation  of  pieces  of  tissue, 
where,  also,  these  operations  can  be  done  without  serious  interference  with  the 
health  of  the  animals  and  where,  moreover,  the  transplants  can  be  recovered 
at  the  time  of  examination  without  much  difficulty.  Pockets  in  the  subcutaneous 
tissue  seem  to  be  most  suitable  for  this  purpose,  and  by  using  this  site  in  the 
majority  of  our  experiments  we  avoided  the  introduction  of  unnecessary  varia- 
tions. In  making  the  pocket  it  is  important  to  avoid  hemorrhages,  which  might 
interfere  with  the  nourishment  of  the  transplant  in  the  period  following  opera- 


GENERAL  CONSIDERATIONS  31 

tion.  In  every  case  it  is  advisable  first  to  study  the  sequence  of  events  in  the 
struggle  of  the  host  against  the  transplant,  which  sets  in  following  trans- 
plantation and  ends  with  the  establishment  of  a  new  equilibrium  of  one  or 
another  kind.  Thereafter,  the  time  of  examination  should  be,  as  far  as  possible, 
a  constant  factor  in  all  the  experiments.  The  time  selected  should  be  such  that 
the  effects  of  the  injury,  due  to  the  process  of  transplantation,  have  disap- 
peared, but  the  reactions  have  not  yet  progressed  so  far  that  finer  gradations 
of  the  effects  in  different  experiments  have  become  impossible.  The  latter 
condition  is  very  important,  but  it  has  not  received  due  consideration  by  some 
investigators.  As  a  rule,  a  period  of  20  to  30  days  following  transplantation 
will  be  found  most  suitable  for  a  comparison  of  the  various  tissue  reactions 
and  for  the  determination  of  relationship  between  the  individuality  differen- 
tials of  host  and  graft.  If  the  degree  of  incompatibility  between  host  and 
transplant  is  only  slight,  a  longer  time  may  be  required  for  the  lymphocytic 
accumulations  and  infiltrations  around  the  graft  to  become  manifest,  and  in 
some  cases  collections  of  lymphocytes  may  appear  even  at  a  very  long  time 
following  transplantation.  However,  in  certain  transplanted  tissues  the  lym- 
phocytic infiltration  does  not  increase  with  increasing  length  of  time  after 
transplantation  and  there  are  some  indications  that  in  some  instances  it  may 
even  decrease  in  strength  with  advancing  time.  Whether  this  decrease  in  the 
effectiveness  of  the  transplant  with  increasing  time,  which  is  especially 
noticeable  after  transplantation  of  cartilage,  is  due  to  a  diminution  in  the 
amount  of  homoiotoxins  produced  or  given  off  in  the  strange  host,  or  whether 
it  is  due  to  an  adaptation  of  the  host  to  the  action  of  the  homoiotoxins,  needs 
further  study. 

The  choice  of  tissues  to  be  used  varies  somewhat  in  different  species.  In 
guinea  pig  and  rat,  the  simultaneous  transplantation  of  thyroid  with  adhering 
parathyroid,  of  xiphoid  cartilage  together  with  the  surrounding  fat  tissue, 
striated  muscle,  and  bone  and  bone  marrow,  will  make  possible  a  satisfactory 
characterization  of  the  relations  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant.  It  may  be  of  advantage  to  add  a  separate  piece  of  striated  muscle, 
thymus  or  salivary  gland  to  the  former  tissues,  all  pieces  to  be  implanted  at 
the  same  time. 

In  the  case  of  the  mouse,  the  thyroid  is  not  quite  so  useful  a  test  tissue  as  in 
guinea  pig  and  rat,  because  in  the  former  species  the  reaction  of  the  host 
against  the  transplant  may  in  some  instances  consist  merely  in  a  shrinking  of 
•the  graft,  unaccompanied  by  the  lymphocytic  reaction  which  is  so  fine  a 
reagent  in  the  case  of  guinea  pig  and  rat.  But,  also  in  the  mouse  a 
lymphocytic  reaction  may  develop  around  grafts  if  incomplete  compatibility 
exists  and  if  the  thyroid  transplant  remains,  on  the  whole,  well  preserved. 
However,  a  shrinking  of  the  thyroid  transplant  may  take  place  also  under  other 
conditions,  as  when,  for  instance,  the  small  thyroid  of  a  very  young  mouse  has 
been  used  for  grafting,  or  when  a  part  of  this  organ  was  injured  during  the 
process  of  transplantation.  This  multiplicity  of  factors,  bringing  about  similar 
results,  may  make  the  analysis  of  the  relation  of  individuality  differentials  in 
the  mouse  more  difficult  in  some  experiments.  Therefore,  in  this  species  it  is 


32  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

advisable  to  transplant  a  larger  number  of  tissues  simultaneously,  such  as 
thyroid,  xiphoid  cartilage  with  associated  tissues,  ovary  and  striated  muscle. 
A  combination  of  this  kind  makes  possible  an  accurate  appraisal  of  the  degree 
of  compatibility  in  the  large  majority  of  cases.  As  a  general  rule,  applying  to 
all  experiments  of  this  kind,  it  is  necessary  to  carry  out  the  operations  in  a 
sterile  manner,  whenever  this  can  be  done,  and  to  inflict  as  little  injury  as 
possible  on  the  tissues.    ■ 

4.  In  the  evaluation  of  the  results  of  the  experiments  various  accidental 
complicating  factors  must  be  considered.  Very  important  in  this  connection  is 
infection  with  bacteria,  which  may  occur  notwithstanding  the  measures  which 
may  have  been  taken  to  avoid  such  an  accident.  In  the  majority  of  instances  it  is 
easy  to  recognize  the  effects  of  bacteria,  with  which  the  tissues  were  con- 
taminated during  the  process  of  transplantation.  The  presence  of  localized 
masses  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  around  or  in  the  graft  indicates 
strongly  the  presence  of  extraneous  microorganisms.  However,  in  some  ex- 
periments it  may  be  difficult  to  decide  whether  the  leucocytes  may  not  have 
been  attracted  by  sterile  necrotic  tissues.  This  difficulty  is  encountered  espe- 
cially in  the  mouse,  where  an  infection  may  more  readily  take  place,  owing  to 
the  small  size  of  these  animals.  Here  we  may  find,  in  or  around  the  transplants, 
either  more  scattered  leucocytes  or  small  accumulations  of  these  cells,  especial- 
ly around  the  fat  cells ;  these  changes  seem  to  be,  on  the  average,  more  wide- 
spread and  more  intense  if  host  and  donor  of  the  transplants  are  not  nearly 
related,  whereas,  they  usually  remain  localized  when  the  degree  of  incom- 
patibility between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  is  only 
slight;  in  cases  of  heterogenous  transplantation,  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes 
are  quite  commonly  attracted.  There  are  certain  other  conditions  when  doubt 
may  arise  as  to  the  significance  of  certain  changes  which  have  taken  place  in 
the  transplant,  as  for  instance,  in  case  of  injury  of  the  transplanted  tissues. 
Thus  injury  to  fat  tissue  surrounding  the  xiphoid  cartilage,  caused  by  pressure 
of  the  forceps  during  the  process  of  grafting,  may  lead  to  localized  necrosis  of 
fat  tissue  and  cartilage ;  subsequently,  the  necrotic  fat  tissue  may  be  replaced 
by  fibrous  tissue,  and  around  the  necrotic  cartilage  a  plate  of  new  perichondrial 
cartilage  may  form. 

Another  difficulty  may  be  encountered  when  the  thyroid  of  the  guinea  pig 
is  transplanted.  If  this  organ  is  surrounded  by  much  fat  tissue,  the  latter  may 
prevent  the  ready  ingrowth  of  capillaries  from  the  host  into  the  graft  and  the 
transplant  may  become  necrotic  over  a  smaller  or  wider  area.  Such  a  result  is 
obtained  especially  if  well-nourished,  older  animals,  in  which  considerable 
amounts  of  fat  tissue  surround  the  thyroid,  are  used  as  donors  and  it  will  be 
necessary  to  guard  against  this  complication.  Further  obstacles  to  a  correct 
interpretation  of  the  experiments  may  be  due  to  the  presence  of  adventitious 
factors,  which  may  accelerate,  intensify  or  retard  the  lymphocytic  reaction. 
While  the  essential  factor  that  determines  the  intensity  of  this  reaction  is  the 
degree  of  incompatibility  existing  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant,  certain  tissues  are  more  prone  to  call  forth  a  strong  reac- 
tion than  others.  Thus  in  guinea  pig  and  rat,  thyroid  tissue  is  usually  more 


GENERAL  CONSIDERATIONS  33 

effective  in  inciting  a  lymphocytic  reaction  than  is  cartilage  with  the  surround- 
ing fat  tissue.  Likewise,  transplants  of  striated  muscle  tissue  may  be  infiltrated 
with  lymphocytes,  when  in  other  tissues  lymphocytes  are  absent  or  much  less 
numerous ;  but  as  a  rule,  also  in  the  muscle  tissue  they  are  present  in  larger 
masses  only  if  there  is  a  definite  antagonism  between  the  individuality  differ- 
entials of  host  and  transplant.  But  lymphocytes  accumulate  very  readily  even 
around  dead  foreign  bodies  such  as  threads,  especially  if  these  foreign  bodies 
are  situated  in  tissues  possessing  an  individuality  differential  which  is  not 
quite  compatible  with  that  of  the  host.  In  cases  of  infection  in  the  fat  tissue  of 
the  mouse,  there  may  be  found  in  addition  to  the  accumulations  of  poly- 
morphonuclear leucocytes,  collections  of  lymphocytes,  an  increase  in  connec- 
tive tissue  and  an  infiltration  of  the  fat  tissue  with  small  vacuolated  epithelioid 
cells;  but  similar  cellular  changes  may  be  noted  in  this  animal  also  if  the 
homoiogenous  differentials  of  host  and  donor  are  sufficiently  strange  to  each 
other.  In  such  cases  we  have  to  deal  either  with  a  summation  of  the  effects  of 
incompatible  individuality  and  organ  differentials,  or  of  the  combined  effects 
of  the  former  and  of  bacterial  infection  or  foreign  body  action.  These  com- 
plications by  no  means  diminish  to  any  considerable  extent  the  value  of  the 
lymphocytic  reaction  as  an  indicator  of  the  relation  of  the  individuality  differ- 
entials to  each  other  even  in  the  mouse,  just  as  little  as  the  value  of  the  agglu- 
tination reaction  in  serological  tests  is  destroyed  by  the  fact  that  also  changes 
in  ion  concentration  in  the  medium  in  which  cells  or  particles  are  suspended 
may  cause  agglutination ;  but  it  will  be  necessary  to  take  all  these  factors  into 
account  in  evaluating  the  results  of  such  experiments. 

In  the  large  majority  of  our  experiments  we  transplanted  pieces  of  two  or 
more  different  tissues  from  the  same  donor  into  different  places  of  the  sub- 
cutaneous tissue  of  the  host  and  these  pieces  were  subsequently  removed  at 
the  same  time  for  examination.  As  a  rule,  it  was  then  found  that  the  kind  and 
intensity  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  these  various  tissues  or  organ 
pieces  were  similar.  In  autotransplantation,  injurious  reactions  were  lacking 
against  all  of  them.  In  homoiotransplantation,  if  a  severe  reaction  took  place 
against  one  of  the  pieces,  all  the  others  were  likewise  severely  damaged;  if 
the  homoiotoxins  were  less  strong,  the  reactions  in  all  pieces  were  equally  mild. 
In  syngenesiotransplantation,  corresponding  reactions  of  a  mild  character 
occurred  in  each  case.  In  general,  also  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  showed  a 
similar  degree  of  intensity  in  the  different  grafts  from  the  same  donor  into 
the  same  host,  provided  the  various  complicating  factors  mentioned  above 
were  taken  into  consideration.  Likewise,  the  reaction  against  all  types  of 
heterogenous  tissues  was  of  the  same  kind.  In  all  these  evaluations  it  is 
necessary  to  make  allowance  for  differences  in  the  sensitiveness,  the  power  of 
resistance,  the  mode  of  growth  of  the  tissues,  and  the  amount  of  individuality 
differential  substances  produced  in  the  various  types  of  transplants.  We  should 
not  expect  the  same  reaction  to  take  place  against  cartilage  as  against  thyroid, 
as  each  of  these  tissues  has  its  own  peculiar  characteristics.  Because  of  the 
presence  of  so  many  variable  factors  present  in  investigations  in  which  living 
tissues  enter  into  various  kinds  of  relations,  it  is  necessary  to  make  in  each 


34  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

instance  a  large  series  of  experiments  in  order  to  arrive  at  correct  interpreta- 
tions and  to  draw  justified  conclusions.  Such  experiments  require,  therefore, 
much  patience  and  experience  on  the  part  of  the  investigator,  but  the  problems 
are  of  sufficient  importance  to  warrant  these  efforts.  However,  after  all  these 
conditions  have  approximately  been  satisfied,  there  remain  still  a  number  of 
variable  factors  in  these  experiments  which  have  not  yet  been  eliminated ; 
therefore  a  complete  solution  of  the  problems  involved  is  impossible  at  the 
present  time  and  must  be  left  to  future  work. 

Since  multiple  transplants  of  various  kinds  from  the  same  donor  into  a  host 
behave  in  a  corresponding  manner,  a  grading  of  results  can  be  made  which 
express  the  degree  of  compatibility  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
donor  and  host,  and  thus  a  standard  can  be  established  with  which  to  compare 
the  results  obtained  in  different  experiments.  The  grades  chosen  for  this  pur- 
pose are  arbitrary;  they  range  between  1  and  3+  (3.25).  In  autotransplanta- 
tion,  the  grades  given  are  3+  and  3.  The  tissues  are  well  preserved  and  while 
at  first  there  may  be  some  irregularities  in  the  structure  of  the  grafts,  they 
gradually  assume  more  and  more  the  characteristics  of  the  normal  organs, 
provided  some  accidental  factors  do  not  prevent  such  a  development.  Marked 
lymphocytic  infiltration  is  lacking,  but  at  early  periods  after  transplantation 
some  very  small  collections  of  lymphocytes  may  be  seen ;  after  some  time, 
these  cells  usually  disappear.  Likewise,  the  connective  tissue  ingrowth  into 
the  autotransplant  is  restricted  and  an  invasion  of  the  fat  tissue  by  small 
vacuolated  cells  and  by  fibrous  tissue  is  lacking.  Grades  3—  (2.75)  and  2  + 
(2.25)  are  given  if  the  grafted  tissues  are,  on  the  whole,  well  preserved,  but 
if  a  reaction  of  the  host  is  definitely  noticeable,  consisting  in  various  degrees 
of  lymphocytic  infiltration  and  in  a  somewhat  increased  activity  of  the  con- 
nective tissue,  which  may  cause  a  rather  mild  injury  to  the  transplant ;  reac- 
tions of  this  kind  may  be  seen  if  donor  and  host  are  related  to  each  other.  If 
the  reactions  are  somewhat  more  marked  and  tend  to  lead  to  a  partial  destruc- 
tion of  the  transplant,  grade  2  is  given ;  this  indicates  a  somewhat  greater 
strangeness  of  the  individuality  differentials.  In  typical,  more  severe  homoio- 
reactions  the  grades  range  between  2—  and  1.  Grade  1  is  applied  in  experi- 
ments in  rats  and  guinea  pigs,  in  which  the  thyroid  has  been  entirely  destroyed 
and  the  fat  tissue  largely  replaced  by  fibrous  tissue;  grade  1+  signifies  the 
survival  of  only  a  small  part  of  the  thyroid  gland ;  the  reaction  in  the  fat  tissue 
is  still  very  severe.  Grade  2—  (1.75)  is  given  if  the  thyroid  gland  is  strongly 
invaded  by  fibrous  tissue  and  a  considerable  part  of  it  has  been  destroyed,  but 
if  at  least  one-half  of  the  organ  has  escaped  destruction  at  the  time  of  ex- 
amination. There  is  usually,  in  these  cases,  a  definite  lymphocytic  infiltration, 
provided  the  injury  to  the  tissues  has  not  led  to  a  marked  diminution  in  the 
amount  of  the  individuality  differential  substance  present  in  or  produced  by 
the  transplant.  If  in  addition  to  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  have  been 
transplanted,  corresponding  grades  may  be  given  in  accordance  with  the  degree 
of  survival  of  the  tissues  and  the  degree  of  lymphocytic  infiltration.  The  addi- 
tion of  ovarian  transplants  may  make  possible  a  still  finer  grading :  in  the  most 
favorable  cases  large  follicles  and  even  corpora  lutea  are  found  in  such  grafts ; 


GENERAL  CONSIDERATIONS  35 

if  the  results  are  somewhat  less  favorable,  medium-sized  or  small  follicles 
develop,  and  a  still  less  favorable  reaction  is  indicated  if  merely  primordial 
follicles  survive,  without  undergoing  further  growth  processes;  if  the  reac- 
tions are  more  severe,  no  follicles  are  seen  in  the  transplant,  but  there  may  be 
only  a  cyst  of  the  germinal  epithelium,  ducts,  spindle-cell  connective  tissue 
and  interstitial  gland,  together  with  necrotic  remnants  of  the  transplanted 
ovary;  under  the  least  favorable  conditions,  interstitial  gland-like  tissue  may 
be  all  that  is  found,  or  even  this  may  be  missing  and  necrotic  material  and 
fibrous  tissue  alone  may  remain.  However,  it  is  always  necessary  to  make 
allowances  for  the  occurrence  of  accidental  injuries  to  the  transplants ;  but 
even  if  it  should  be  difficult  to  recognize  the  latter,  errors  in  the  interpretation 
of  the  reactions  can  be  avoided  by  performing  a  number  of  experiments,  in- 
stead of  relying  on  a  single  one.  While  this  method  of  grading  can  claim  only 
approximate  exactness,  still  it  is  very  helpful  in  comparing  results  obtained  if 
different  types  of  individuality  differentials  are  made  to  interact. 

In  some  cases  we  have  used  a  second  type  of  grades,  which  were  as  follows : 
Grade  6  is  given  to  a  typical  autotransplant ;  grade  5  to  a  favorable,  and  grade 
4  to  a  less  favorable  syngenesiotransplant ;  grade  3  to  a  milder  and  grade  2  to  a 
severe  homoiotransplant ;  grade  1  has  the  same  meaning  in  both  types  of 
grades.  These  two  systems  of  grading  correspond  to  each  other  about  as 
follows : 


Type 

of 

Second  Grades 

Main  Grades 

6 

= 

3  + 

5 

= 

3  or  3  — 

4 

= 

2+   or  2 

3 

= 

2  or  2  — 

2 

= 

1  + 

1 

=. 

1 

Unless  specifically  so  stated,  the  first  type  of  grading  was  used.  In  a  general 
way,  these  series  of  reactions  correspond  to  the  spectrum  of  relationships  ex- 
tending from  the  autogenous  through  the  syngenesious,  first  to  the  light  and 
then  to  the  severe  homoiogenous  reactions.  Certain  features  indicating  a  still 
more  severe  injury  are  added  in  the  case  of  heterogenous  transplantations. 

As  to  the  terminology  employed  in  distinguishing  various  types  of  trans- 
plantation, very  frequently  the  terms :  autoplastic,  homoio-  or  isoplastic,  and 
heteroplastic  are  used  in  the  literature.  However,  the  affix  "plastic"  accentu- 
ates the  practical  use  which  is  made  of  transplantation  in  surgical  "plastic" 
operations.  But,  transplantations  may  serve  also  as  a  method  for  the  deter- 
mination of  the  genetic  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  donor,  and  then  it  would  be  more  appropriate  to  designate  these 
various  types  of  transplantation  as  autogenous,  syngenesious,  homoiogenous 
and  heterogenous,  in  order  to  emphasize  the  importance  of  genetic  factors  in 
such  experiments. 

Transplantations  in  which  the  relationships  between  host  and  transplant  can 


36  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

be  graded  and  in  which  a  variety  of  tissues  can  be  chosen  for  grafting  provide 
the  opportunity  not  only  for  the  analysis  of  the  organismal  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant,  but  also  for  the  study  of  the  interaction  of  various  types 
of  tissues  and  cells  and  of  the  factors  which  determine  the  tissue  equilibria ; 
they  may  therefore  serve  also  as  a  method  which  may  be  of  value  in  building 
up  a  physiology  of  tissues,  in  contrast  to  the  physiology  of  organs  which  has 
been  so  extensively  studied  in  the  past.  Accordingly,  we  shall  emphasize  this 
aspect  of  our  investigations  in  describing  our  results. 


Chapter  2 
Autogenous  and  Homoiogenous  Transplantations 

We  shall  now  compare  the  reactions  against  autogenous  and  homoi- 
ogenous transplants,  first  in  rats  and  guinea  pigs  and  then  in  mice 
and  chickens,  and  we  shall  consider  the  transplantation  of  thyroid, 
cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  and  later  also  that  of  striated  muscle  and  a  few  other 
tissues. 

1.  Autogenous  transplantation  of  thyroid  in  rat  and  guinea  pig.  After  auto- 
transplantation  of  thyroid  in  rat,  as  well  as  in  guinea  pig,  there  remains  at 
first  a  ring  of  preserved  acinar  tissue  around  a  central  necrotic  zone;  the 
latter  is  smaller  in  the  rat.  Blood  vessels  and  connective  tissue  cells  are  at- 
tracted by  the  transplant  and  the  vessels  and  fibroblasts  penetrate  towards 
the  necrotic  center,  where  they  form  a  loose,  vascularized  connective  tissue. 
In  the  guinea  pig,  this  takes  the  form  of  a  distinct  myxoid  zone,  situated  be- 
tween the  necrotic  center  and  the  peripheral  ring  of  living  acini,  whereas, 
in  the  rat  this  ringlike  myxoid  area  is  not  so  distinct.  The  organization  of 
the  center  in  the  latter  species  is  usually  completed  by  the  15th  day,  when 
also  the  necrotic  center  of  the  parathyroid  has  been  replaced  by  connec- 
tive tissue ;  at  this  time,  furthermore,  accompanying  the  fibroblasts  and  vessels, 
a  few  lymphocytes  or  very  small  groups  of  lymphocytes  may  be  seen  in 
the  central  or  peripheral  connective  tissue  of  the  graft.  In  the  first  week 
after  transplantation  the  colloid  may  be  lacking  in  the  acini  of  the  transplant 
and  phagocytes  may  contribute  to  the  destruction  of  the  latter,  but  after  two 
weeks  this  colloid  has  been  replaced  by  newly-formed  colloid  wihin  the  acini, 
the  epithelium  of  which  is  rather  low.  The  number  of  fibroblasts  which  move 
towards  the  center  is,  on  the  whole,  rather  small,  and  the  few  lymphocytes 
which  may  accompany  these  cells  are  probably  attracted  by  non-specific  fac- 
tors, perhaps  by  the  necrotic  tissue ;  in  other  cases,  foreign  bodies  may  attract 
some  lymphocytes.  Around  the  4th  week,  or  somewhat  earlier,  the  transplanted 
thyroid  shows  a  curved  structure.  At  this  time  an  interesting  change  takes 
place,  leading  to  the  disappearance  of  the  central  connective  issue  which  had 
been  formed  by  the  organization  of  the  central  necrotic  material.  This  con- 
nective tissue,  which  may  have  become  fibrous  or  hyaline,  is  either  pushed  out 
of  the  transplant  into  the  neighboring  tissue  or  it  is  invaded  and  absorbed  by 
new  fibroblasts  of  the  host,  although  a  small  amount  of  hyaline  material  may 
remain  within  the  inner  ring  of  acini.  The  acini  are  surrounded  by  well-formed 
capillaries,  not  necessarily  accompanied  by  fibroblasts.  Towards  the  end  of  the 
5th  week,  lymphocytes  are  either  entirely  lacking,  or,  in  certain  cases,  are 
present  in  small  collections.  Between  the  40th  and  60th  day  the  transplant 
begins  to  resemble  the  normal  thyroid,  but  the  epithelium  is  lower  than  in  the 
original  acini  and  a  very  small  amount  of  fibrous  tissue  may  be  found  between 

37 


38  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

some  of  them.  In  the  lymph  vessels,  no  lymphocytes,  or  only  a  few,  may  be 
seen.  As  in  the  rat,  so  too  in  the  guinea  pig  the  ingrowth  of  fibroblasts  is 
limited  and  a  loose  connective  tissue  forms  in  the  center  adjoining  the  thyroid; 
but  the  latter  formation,  assuming  the  shape  of  a  ring,  is  more  pronounced 
here  than  in  the  rat.  Also  in  the  guinea  pig  the  central  fibrous  tissue  is  elimin- 
ated after  some  time,  and  in  both  rat  and  guinea  pig  the  blood  vessels  are  at- 
tracted by  autogenous  substance ;  this  conclusion  is  based  on  the  fact  that  the 
vascularization  is  more  marked  in  autogenous  than  in  homoiogenous  trans- 
plants ;  in  addition,  in  the  former,  lymphocytes  are  lacking  or  slight  in  number. 
In  rat  as  well  as  in  guinea  pig  the  injury  to  the  acini  and  the  destruction  of 
colloid  are  gradually  repaired  and  the  transplants  assume  more  and  more  the 
character  of  the  normal  gland.  The  activity  of  the  connective  tissue  and 
lymphocytes  is,  therefore,  restrained  around  and  in  autogenous  thyroid  grafts 
and  this  condition  is  best  suited  for  the  restoration  of  the  normal  tissue  rela- 
tions and  of  the  normal  structure  of  such  transplants. 

2.  Homoiogenous  transplantation  of  the  thyroid  in  rat  and  guinea  pig. 
The  intensity  of  this  reaction  depends  largely  on  the  relationship  between  host 
and  donor.  In  the  rat,  we  carried  out,  therefore,  three  series  of  experiments,  in 
which  the  average  relationship  was  somewhat  varied;  the  probability  that  a 
distant  relationship  existed  between  donor  and  host  was  greater  in  series  B 
than  in  series  A;  in  both  of  these  series  white  rats  were  used.  In  series  C, 
tissues  of  white  rats  were  exchanged  with  those  of  cream  and  hooded  rats.  In 
all  of  these  series  the  same  factors  co-operated  in  inflicting  damage  on  the 
transplant,  namely,  (1)  the  action  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  (2)  the  in- 
creased invasion  by  fibroblasts  and  lymphocytes  and  the  increased  production 
of  fibrous  or  fibrous-hyaline  tissue,  which  later  interfered  with  the  nutrition 
of  the  transplant  and  injured  it  by  exerting  pressure  on  it,  and  (3)  the  dimin- 
ished supply  of  blood  and  lymph  vessels,  which  also  diminished  the  nourish- 
ment of  the  transplant.  In  series  C  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  was  greatest, 
and  in  series  A  it  was  slightly  greater  than  in  series  B.  In  both  the  latter  series 
the  maximum  of  the  reaction  was  obtained  between  the  20th  and  30th  day 
after  transplantation,  but  in  series  B,  where  there  was  probably,  on  the  aver- 
age, a  nearer  relationship  between  the  different  rats  than  in  series  A,  an  im- 
provement in  the  average  condition  of  the  transplants  was  observed  from  then 
on ;  this  was  lacking  in  series  A  and  C. 

In  series  A  and  B,  at  first  conditions  were  similar.  Between  the  1st  and  8th 
days,  two  or  three  layers  of  acini  were  preserved  in  a  number  of  instances,  but 
in  others  they  were  less  well  preserved ;  the  acini  were  small  and  the  colloid 
had  been  lost  in  many  of  them,  while  in  others  it  was  still  present.  Some 
capillaries  grew  through  the  ring  of  acini  and  mitoses  were  seen  in  the  acinus 
cells.  The  necrotic  center  was  organized  by  not  very  dense,  small-celled  con- 
nective tissue  or  by  very  dense  fibrous  tissue,  or  in  certain  cases  some  necrotic 
material  was  still  left  and  was  at  least  partly  taken  up  by  phagocytes.  Hemor- 
rhages from  the  rupture  of  the  newly-formed  capillaries  may  have  occurred. 
From  the  6th  day  on,  lymphocytes  appeared  in  series  A,  while  in  series  B  they 
accumulated  somewhat  later.  They  were  carried  to  the  transplant  first  by  way 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  39 

of  the  lymph  vessels  and  they  collected  at  the  periphery  of  the  center,  or  they 
filled  the  center  diffusely;  moreover,  lymphocytes  and  also  some  connective 
tissue  cells  surrounded  some  acini.  The  central  portion  of  the  parathyroid  was 
necrotic  and  in  process  of  organization.  Mitoses  were  seen  in  both  thyroid  and 
parathyroid. 

In  series  A,  between  the  10th  and  15th  day,  the  thyroid  transplant  had  dis- 
appeared, only  fibrous  tissue  with  some  lymphocytes  was  observed  in  a  number 
of  cases.  In  other  experiments  there  were  some  isolated  acini  or  groups  of 
acini  embedded  in  masses  of  lymphocytes,  which  had  accumulated  and  which 
gave  to  the  transplant  almost  the  appearance  of  a  lymph  gland.  Lymphocytes 
could  be  seen  penetrating  between  and  into  certain  acini  and  destroying  them. 
The  center  of  the  transplant  was  densely  fibrous  and  blood  vessels  were  here 
less  conspicuous.  As  a  rule,  the  thyroid  ring,  if  present  at  all,  was  incomplete. 
After  16  and  17  days,  variable  amounts  of  thyroid  tissue  were  found  pre- 
served; if  the  amount  was  small,  the  colloid  was  usually  lost.  Fibrous  bands 
separated  acini  or  bundles  of  acini  and  lymphocytes  separated  acini  in  certain 
areas;  the  center  of  the  transplant  and  the  lymph  vessels  were  filled  with 
lymphocytes.  There  was  some  indication  also  in  this  series  that  the  homoio- 
reaction  was  especially  marked  after  transplantation  in  certain  strains  of  rats. 

Series  B  differed  from  series  A  in  that,  in  the  former,  the  reactions  were 
on  the  average  slightly  less  severe  up  to  about  30  days  after  transplantation, 
but  from  then  on,  a  diminution  in  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction 
and  in  the  destruction  of  thyroid  issue  set  in,  which  was  quite  noticeable  be- 
tween the  40th  and  85th  days.  While  the  lymphocytic  reaction  appeared  some- 
what later  in  series  B,  a  marked  lymphocytic  infiltration  did  occur,  and  fibrous 
bands  surrounded  the  acini  during  the  earlier  periods.  In  both  series,  in  ex- 
ceptional cases,  the  grafts  showed  the  character  of  typical  syngenesiotrans- 
plants,  in  which,  instead  of  dense  fibrous  tissue,  there  was  loose  connective 
tissue  with  blood  vessels  in  the  center ;  here  lymphocytes  had  accumulated  as 
well  as  in  the  periphery  of  the  graft  and  they  penetrated  also  between  the 
acini.  But  in  other  instances  there  was,  in  these  cases,  an  intense  destruction 
of  the  thyroid  by  lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue. 

In  series  C,  a  complete  or  almost  complete  destruction  of  thyroid  and  para- 
thyroid had  occurred  at  about  20  days  after  transplantation,  the  reaction  being 
very  severe,  in  accordance  with  the  greater  difference  between  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  donor.  There  are,  then,  indications  that  the  intensity 
of  the  reactions  against  transplanted  thyroid  varies  in  accordance  with  the 
relationship  between  host  and  transplant. 

In  homoiogenous  transplantations  of  the  thyroid  gland  in  the  guinea  pig, 
which  were  carried  out  with  Hesselberg,  the  results  were  very  similar  to  those 
obtained  in  rats.  Yet  some  differences  between  autogenous  and  homoiogenous 
transplantations  are  brought  out  perhaps  more  clearly  in  the  former  than  in  the 
latter  species.  In  a  first  period,  lasting  about  four  to  five  days  and  representing 
the  earliest  reaction  to  the  injury,  there  is  no  marked  difference  between 
transplantation  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  thyroid.  During  this  interval 
the  first  mitoses  appear  and  at  the  end  of  it  some  new  acini  may  be  produced. 


40  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

There  follows  a  second  stage,  one  of  transition,  extending  from  the  5th  to  the 
12th  day,  in  which  the  formation  of  acini  is  less  in  homoiogenous  than  in 
autogenous  tissue;  likewise,  colloid  is  newly  produced  in  lesser  amounts  in 
homoiogenous  than  in  autogenous  grafts  and  this  may  perhaps  be  at  least 
partly  due  to  injury  inflicted  by  the  homoiotoxins  rather  than  by  the  lympho- 
cytes of  the  host.  During  this  period,  and  still  more  so  during  the  third  period, 
beginning  after  12  days,  there  is  an  increase  in  lymphocytes  and  connective 
tissue  in  the  homoiotransplants ;  the  fibroblasts  tend  to  produce  fibrous  tissue, 
which  separates  groups  of  acini  as  well  as  isolated  acini  and  exerts  pressure  on 
them ;  the  lymphocytes  accumulate  in  increasing  numbers  in  the  homoiotrans- 
plants and  invade  and  destroy  the  acini.  In  the  autotransplants,  wider  blood 
capillaries  grow  through  the  thyroid  ring  into  the  center  and  here  the  zone  of 
myxoid  connective  tissue  develops,  which  we  have  already  mentioned,  and  it 
surrounds  the  central  fibrous  tissue,  which  is  either  converted  into  loose  con- 
nective tissue  by  ingrowing  capillaries  and  fibroblasts  or  is  expelled  into  the 
surrounding  tissue.  At  the  same  time,  fat  tissue  may  be  pushed  into  the  center 
of  the  thyroid  from  the  outside  and  fat  cells  may  be  observed,  although  very 
rarely,  also  in  the  lumen  of  an  acinus.  This  distribution  of  thyroid  acini  in  the 
fat  tissue  is  not  found  in  homoiotransplants.  At  a  later  period,  as,  for  instance, 
five  months  after  transplantation,  the  autotransplanted  thyroid  may  be  almost 
like  the  normal,  non-transplanted  gland.  Dense  fibrous  tissue  separating  the 
acini,  as  well  as  collections  of  lymphocytes,  is  lacking.  The  center  of  the  graft 
consists  merely  of  small  amounts  or  strands  of  loose  connective  tissue.  How- 
ever, mitoses  are  not  frequently  seen  in  such  transplants.  The  greatest  number 
of  mitoses  is  found  from  7  to  9  days  following  autotransplantation  and  some 
mitoses  may  be  found  at  this  time  even  in  homoiotransplants;  they  may  still 
be  frequent  in  autogenous  transplants  during  the  later  days  of  the  second 
week,  but  are  lacking  or  very  rare  after  17  days. 

In  discussing  the  variable  accidental  factors  which,  apart  from  the  nature 
of  the  individuality  differentials,  may  influence  the  result  of  transplantation 
of  various  organs,  we  mentioned  the  fact  that  if  together  with  the  thyroid 
gland  much  fat  tissue  is  transplanted,  a  great  part  or  even  the  whole  of  the 
transplant  may  become  necrotic.  This  seems  to  be  true,  however,  only  of 
homoiotransplants.  The  same  factor  interferes  with  autogenous  transplants 
much  less  seriously ;  it  appears  that  in  the  latter  a  partial  necrosis  caused  by 
the  fat  tissue,  may  later  disappear,  as  a  further  demonstration  of  the  great 
power  of  adjustment  possessed  by  autogenous  tissue. 

We  find,  in  guinea  pigs,  that  younger  hosts  react  on  the  average  in  a  milder 
way  towards  homoiogenous  transplants  than  do  older  animals ;  thus  in  grafts 
made  in  hosts  about  10  days  old  the  preservation  of  the  thyroid  gland  is,  on 
the  average,  somewhat  better  and  the  formation  of  fibrous  tissue  in  the  trans- 
plant less  extensive  than  in  older  hosts.  Moreover,  the  lymphocytic  reaction 
may  be  less  severe;  but  if  the  preservation  of  the  thyroid  tissue  is  relatively 
good,  the  lymphocytic  reaction  may  be  quite  intense  in  the  young  guinea  pigs 
as  well.  Some  differences  between  younger  and  older  hosts  may  be  noticeable 
between  11  and  17  days  after  transplantation.  While  as  a  rule  also  in  younger 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  41 

animals  there  are  typical  homoiogenous  reactions,  occasionally  reactions  ap- 
pear which  are  more  characteristic  of  syngenesiotransplants,  and  even  as  late 
as  20  to  25  days  following  transplantation  the  grade  3—  was  obtained  in  a 
younger  host,  which  signifies  that  the  structure  of  the  graft  approached  that 
seen  after  autotransplantation.  In  older  guinea  pigs  the  reactions  were  more 
severe.  However,  we  found  that  in  different  series  of  experiments  with  guinea 
pigs  obtained  from  different  breeders,  the  severity  of  the  reactions  differed 
somewhat,  in  the  same  way  as  in  transplantations  in  the  rat. 

The  grades  obtained  between  20  and  25  days  after  homoiotransplantation 
were  1,1  +  ,  and  2—.  Between  25  and  40  days,  in  the  majority  of  cases,  the 
grade  was  1 ;  in  only  one-third  of  the  cases  the  grade  1+  (1.25),  and  in  no 
case  grade  2—  (1.75),  was  reached.  In  younger  guinea  pigs  the  grades  be- 
tween 20  and  25  days  were  somewhat  better;  they  varied  between  1  and  2, 
and  even  grade  3  —  (2.75)  was  attained.  Even  after  50  and  60  days,  while 
the  grade  was  mostly  1,  in  a  few  cases  grades  2— /1+  (1.50),  or  even 
2/2—  (1.87),  were  obtained. 

3.  The  effect  of  feeding  thyroid  substance  to  guinea  pigs  which  are  hosts  of 
thyroid  transplants.  If  preparations  of  thyroid  gland  are  added  to  the  diet 
of  normal  guinea  pigs,  the  mitotic  activity  of  these  transplants  decreases  and 
the  colloid  becomes  hard,  as  an  indication  of  the  diminished  function  of  this 
gland.  However,  when  we  gave,  by  mouth,  daily  0.1  grain  of  thyroid  to 
guinea  pigs  which  received  autotransplants  of  thyroid  gland,  the  success  of 
the  transplantation  was  not  diminished  thereby,  although  the  height  of  the 
acinar  epithelium  was  low  or  medium  to  low.  No  increase  in  connective  tissue 
nor  in  lymphocytes  took  place.  Likewise,  in  guinea  pigs  with  homoiotrans- 
plants  of  thyroid  gland,  thyroid  feeding  did  not  have  any  noticeable  effect 
on  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  transplant.  The  grade  in  one  guinea 
pig,  after  30  days,  was  1 ;  after  20  days,  the  grades  were :  1  in  6  guinea  pigs ; 
2—  in  2  guinea  pigs ;  2  in  3  guinea  pigs,  and  in  2  additional  guinea  pigs  it  was 
2  and  2—  respectively.  After  13  days,  the  grade  was  1  —  .  In  a  second  experi- 
ment with  younger  guinea  pigs  the  grades  varied  between  1  and  2.  The  effect 
which  administration  of  thyroid  hormone  exerts  on  the  thyroid  gland  did 
not,  therefore,  change  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  transplants  of  this  organ. 

Autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantation  of  cartilage  and  fat  tissue 
in  rat  and  guinea  pig. 

4.  Autotrans planted  xiphoid  cartilage  in  the  rat,  as  a  rule,  remains  well 
preserved  and  the  perichondrium  is  free  of  lymphocytes,  in  rat  (as  well 
as  in  guinea  pig)  only  when  the  cartilage  has  been  injured  as  the  result  of 
the  operation,  or  is  poorly  nourished,  owing  to  pressure  or  hemorrhage  in 
the  surrounding  tissue  or  other  injurious  factors,  it  becomes  necrotic.  Thus, 
if  the  thick  end  of  the  cartilage  near  the  bone  is  transplanted,  the  center  of  the 
transplanted  piece  may  be  at  a  disadvantage  because  of  the  lack  of  nourishment 
and  may  become  necrotic  and  dissolved ;  subsequently,  connective  tissue  may 
invade  and  replace  the  necrotic  central  areas.  Necrotic  pieces  of  cartilage  may 
be  surrounded  by  connective  tissue  which  has  grown  into  and  replaced  the 
transplanted  fat  tissue,  or  the  perichondria!  tissue  may  produce  a  new  plate 


42  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  cartilage  around  the  necrotic  area,  and  in  some  instances  the  newly- formed 
cartilage  may  even  infiltrate  and  take  the  place  of  the  necrotic  part.  Corre- 
spondingly, central  necrosis  and  solution  processes  may  be  found  even  in 
the  normal,  not  transplanted  xiphoid  cartilage,  in  places  where  it  is  thick  and 
where  the  central  parts  are  therefore  not  well  nourished.  Transplanted  fat 
tissue  remains  normal,  but  occasionally  necrotic  areas  are  found  in  it,  pre- 
sumably as  the  result  of  injury  inflicted  upon  it  during  the  transplantation ; 
there  may  be  at  first  very  slight  collections  of  lymphocytes,  due  probably 
to  the  presence  of  necrotic  areas  or  to  other  accidental  alterations  of  the  fat 
tissue,  but  these  disappear  somewhat  later. 

5.  Homoiogenous  transplantation  in  the  rat  of  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  pro- 
duces the  changes  characteristic  of  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials. 
The  same  three  series  of  transplantations  were  made  in  the  rat  with  cartilage, 
bone  and  fat  tissue  as  with  thyroid.  With  thyroid,  there  was  a  grading  of  the 
intensity  of  the  reaction,  corresponding  to  the  average  degree  of  similarity  or 
lack  of  similarity  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  these  series.  Upon  this 
condition  depended  the  amount  of  tissue  destroyed  and  replaced  by  fibrous 
tissue  and  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction.  If  we  compare  with  these 
gradations  in  thyroid,  the  gradations  in  cartilage,  bone  and  fat  tissue  trans- 
plants, we  find  in  principle,  in  both  kinds  of  grafts,  the  same  condition,  except 
that  the  differences  in  the  power  of  resistance  of  different  tissues  caused  some 
differences  in  the  mode  of  reaction  and  in  the  absolute  grades  given.  The 
greater  portion  of  the  cartilage  could  remain  alive  permanently  in  all  three 
series  of  homoiotransplantations,  but  the  fate  of  the  fat  tissue,  epiphyseal 
cartilage,  bone  and  bone  marrow,  and  the  frequency  and  character  of  the 
regenerative  processes  around  necrotic  parts  of  the  cartilage  served  as  indica- 
tors of  the  severity  of  the  reaction  and  of  the  degree  of  compatibility  of  the 
individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant. 

Even  in  series  C,  in  which  host  and  donor  of  the  transplant  were  least  nearly 
related,  the  cartilage  remained  alive,  and  if  there  was  localized  necrosis  a 
regeneration  of  perichondrial  cartilage  could  take  place,  although  this  did 
perhaps  not  occur  as  regularly  as  in  series  A  and  B,  and  in  some  cases  it  led 
to  the  formation  of  a  myxoid  tissue  instead  of  cartilage ;  this  occurred  if  the 
intercellular  cartilage  substance  was  dissolved,  while  the  cartilage  cells  re- 
mained alive.  Evidently  the  development  of  toxic  substances  could  inhibit  the 
regeneration  of  cartilage.  The  epiphyseal  cartilage  and  the  transplanted  bone 
were  completely  or  almost  completely  necrotic  in  this  series.  However,  there  is 
some  difficulty  in  the  determination  of  the  degree  of  necrosis  of  bone.  If  we 
adopt  the  condition  of  the  bone  cells  as  a  criterion  of  the  life  or  death  of  this 
tissue,  then  we  encounter  the  difficulty  that  many  of  the  apparently  preserved 
and  living  bone  cells  may  in  reality  be  connective  tissue  cells,  that  had  moved 
into  the  bone  from  the  outside,  in  particular,  from  a  zone  of  epithelioid  cells 
surrounding  the  bone-cartilage  border  and  perhaps  representing  merely  fibro- 
blasts, which,  under  the  influence  of  bone  tissue,  assumed  the  character  of 
epithelioid  cells.  But  ordinary  connective  tissue  cells  may  also  invade  and 
replace  necrotic  bone  and  cartilage.  There  was  extensive  necrosis  in  the  trans- 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  43 

planted  fat  tissue  and  replacement  of  the  latter  by  fibrous  tissue.  Variable 
amounts  of  fat  tissue  could  remain  preserved,  but  it  might  be  invaded  by 
epithelioid  and  giant  cells.  Lymphocytic  infiltration  was  usually  marked  in  the 
fibrous  tissue  around  the  cartilage  as  well  as  around  the  blood  vessels  which 
supplied  the  fat  tissue  with  blood,  and  also  around  the  bone,  but  at  other  times 
the  infiltration  was  moderate.  In  one  transplant,  even  remnants  of  striated 
muscle  tissue  with  nuclear  chains  were  found.  On  the  whole,  the  connective 
tissue  and  lymphocytic  reaction  against  the  transplant  was  considerable  in 
series  C,  and  more  intense  than  in  series  A  and  B.  Likewise,  the  bone  marrow 
became  more  rapidly  and  more  completely  necrotic  and  it  was  more  exten- 
sively replaced  by  fibrillar  connective  tissue  than  it  was  in  the  first  two  series. 
In  series  A  and  B,  the  necrosis  of  the  fat  tissue  was  less  marked  than  in  series 
C  or  it  was  lacking  altogether,  and  there  was  often  only  localized  ingrowth  of 
connective  tissue  into  the  fat  tissue,  together  with  a  moderate  invasion  by 
lymphocytes,  which  had  a  tendency  to  collect  around  the  perichondrium. 

As  to  the  time  relations  in  these  reactions,  they  were  about  as  follows :  In  the 
first  three  days  after  transplantation  there  was  noticeable  a  movement  of  some 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  fat  tissue,  in  the  direction  towards  the 
cartilage ;  these  cells  disappeared  in  the  following  days.  Between  the  6th  and 
8th  day,  a  new  formation  of  cartilage  could  set  in  and  a  slight  infiltration  with 
lymphocytes,  varying  in  strength  in  different  specimens,  took  place.  The  re- 
action against  the  transplanted  tissue  usually  was  quite  distinct  on  the  10th 
day  after  transplantation  and  the  maximum  could  be  reached  between  the  20th 
and  30th  day.  At  this  time,  the  average  grade  in  series  A  was  about  2—  and 
in  series  B  it  was  intermediate  between  2—  and  2.  Between  the  30th  and  85th 
day  a  decrease  in  the  average  severity  of  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  could 
occur,  while  the  connective  tissue  reaction  remained  in  a  quiescent  state.  In 
some  instances,  at  late  stages  the  transplant  even  resembled  an  autotransplant, 
perhaps  on  account  of  an  adaptation  of  the  host  to  the  originally  strange  tissue, 
a  condition  possibly  akin  to  a  state  of  active  immunity. 

In  general  there  was,  in  the  various  experiments,  a  parallelism  in  the  grades 
of  thyroid  and  cartilage-fat  transplants.  In  rats,  in  which  the  homoiogenous 
reaction  was  weak  or  lacking  altogether  in  thyroid  transplants,  it  was  also  as 
a  rule  lacking  or  weak  in  cartilage-fat  transplants ;  but  the  destruction  of  the 
tissue  by  lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue  was,  on  the  whole,  much  greater 
in  the  thyroid  than  in  the  cartilage;  however,  there  were  some  instances  in 
which  the  thyroid  transplant  was  so  markedly  invaded  by  lymphocytes  that  it 
almost  resembled  a  lymph  gland,  and  then  the  cartilage-fat  transplant  likewise 
was  severely  infiltrated.  On  the  whole,  then,  the  principles  which  applied  to 
the  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant 
and  the  reactions  towards  the  transplanted  tissues  were  about  the  same  in  the 
case  of  thyroid  and  cartilage-fat  tissue. 

6.  Autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantations  in  the  guinea  pig,  of 
cartilage-fat  tissue  with  the  associated  tissues,  are  very  similar  to  the  corres- 
ponding conditions  in  the  rat.  Again,  in  the  first  stages  following  transplanta- 
tion there  may  be  in  both  kinds  of  transplants,  some  polymorphonuclear  leu- 


44  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

oocytes,  which  later  disappear.  Fibroblasts  and  capillaries  may  grow  into 
blood  clots  and  organize  them,  and  connective  tissue  cells  may  penetrate  also 
into  wounds  or  into  necrotic  areas  in  the  cartilage.  Some  collections  of  lympho- 
cytes around  blood  vessels  or  around  the  perichondrium  and  some  increase  in 
the  connective  tissue  in  the  transplanted  fat  tissue  in  autogenous  transplants 
may  later  disappear. 

In  the  guinea  pig  as  in  the  rat,  homoiogenous  cartilage  may  survive  at  least 
for  as  long  as  almost  six  months,  and  probably  permanently,  although  slight 
degenerative  changes  or,  in  places,  complete  necrosis  may  take  place  in  the 
intercellular  cartilage  substance  in  the  course  of  the  first  or  second  week. 
During  the  second  and  third  weeks,  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  may  become 
quite  marked,  although  this  varies  in  different  cases  and  even  in  different 
places  in  the  same  transplant.  In  some  instances,  towards  the  end  of  the  third 
week,  the  lymphocytes  may  be  so  numerous  that  the  cartilage  becomes  se- 
questered. During  this  time,  also,  the  connective-tissue  growth  continues,  lead- 
ing either  to  a  thickening  of  the  septa  in  the  fat  tissue  or  to  a  substitution  of 
fat  tissue  by  fibrous  tissue.  In  the  second  week,  epithelioid  and  giant  cells 
develop  fairly  often  in  the  fat  tissue  and  frequently  perichondrial  cartilage  is 
formed  around  necrotic  cartilage.  It  is  of  interest  that  in  all  the  species  ex- 
amined so  far,  mitoses  are  rarely  found  in  perichondrial  tissue  and  in  young 
cartilage  cells,  and  only  once  was  a  mitosis  seen  in  a  perichondrial  cell  in  the 
guinea  pig.  During  the  fourth  week  the  homoiogenous  reaction  is  fully  de- 
veloped. Not  only  may  newly-formed  cartilage  surround  the  necrotic  area,  but 
also  connective  tissue  with  lymphocytes,  with  or  without  blood  capillaries, 
or  lymphocytes  without  connective  tissue  may  penetrate  a  necrotic  area  in 
the  cartilage  and  replace  it.  Lymphocytes  may  infiltrate  and  destroy  part  of 
the  perichondrium,  but  they  penetrate  the  hyaline  intercellular  cartilage  sub- 
stance not  at  all,  or  merely  for  a  short  distance.  They  do  not  destroy  healthy 
cartilage  to  any  large  extent.  On  the  other  hand,  cellular  cartilage  may  more 
readily  be  invaded  by  lymphocytes  and,  at  least  in  part,  be  destroyed.  But  on  the 
whole  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  in  cartilage- fat  transplants  is  moderate  and 
it  is  found  especially  around  the  living  cartilage,  in  places  where  dense  fibrous 
tissue  surrounds  cartilage  or  perichondrium ;  but  there  may  be  much  lympho- 
cytic infiltration  also  in  preserved  fat  and  areolar  tissue.  During  the  second 
month  conditions  are  similar  and  lymphocytes  may  now  also  move  lengthwise 
in  the  direction  of  the  fibrillation  in  the  cartilaginous  ground  substance  and 
here  they  gradually  perish.  The  injurious  action  of  the  lymphocytes  makes  it 
occasionally  possible  for  the  blood  vessels  and  connective  tissue  cells  to  pene- 
trate for  a  short  distance  the  marginal  portion  of  the  cartilage.  Otherwise, 
connective  tissue  cells  push  only  into  necrotic  cartilage.  After  5^2  months,  the 
reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host  cells  was  not  more  intense  than  at  earlier 
periods  and  the  lymphocytic  reaction  over  wide  areas  could  be  mild ;  likewise, 
some  fat  and  areolar  tissue  could  still  be  preserved.  The  homoiogenous  bone 
marrow  had  become  necrotic  and  was  replaced  by  a  loose  fibrillar  connective 
tissue ;  bone  was  surrounded  in  places  by  giant  cells. 

In  general,  in  homoiogenous  thyroid  and  fat  tissue  the  activities  of  the  con- 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  45 

nective  tissue  and  lymphocytes  set  in  at  about  the  same  time,  and  in  the  same 
host  the  relative  degree  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction  was  in  many  cases  the 
same  in  various  tissues,  despite  the  fact  that  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  give  off  a 
smaller  amount  of  homoiogenous  substance  than  do  thyroid  and  kidney.  Al- 
though it  seems  that  lymph  vessels  grow  more  actively  into  the  thyroid  than 
into  fat  tissue,  it  is  not  probable  that  this  explains  the  difference  in  the  degree 
of  lymphocytic  reaction  in  these  two  tissues,  especially  in  view  of  the  observa- 
tion that  the  lymph  vessels  which  grow  into  the  homoiogenous  fat  tissue  are 
less  crowded  with  lymphocytes  than  are  those  in  the  thyroid  gland. 

Autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants  of  cartilage-fat  tissue  differ, 
then,  not  only  in  the  greater  ability  of  the  former  to  survive  and  the  great 
injury  inflicted  on  the  latter  by  the  homoiotoxins,  as  well  as  by  various  kinds  of 
host  cells,  but  also  in  the  greater  regulative  power  in  the  autogenous  tissues 
which  successfully  overcomes  the  results  of  injuries  caused  by  the  experimen- 
tal procedures  used.  However,  also  homoiogenous  cartilage,  perichondrium 
and  fat  tissue  possess  to  some  extent  still  a  certain  regulative  power,  as  indi- 
cated by  the  new  formation  of  perichondrial  cartilage  around  an  area  of 
necrotic  cartilage.  In  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantations  condi- 
tions are  therefore  very  similar  in  rat  and  guinea  pig.  A  first  period  of  injury 
and  degeneration  is  followed  by  a  second  period  of  recovery  and  regeneration, 
which  affects  the  same  tissues.  There  are,  however,  some  minor  differences, 
mainly  of  a  quantitative  nature,  in  these  two  species.  In  the  rat  the  regenerative 
activity  of  the  perichondrial  cells  seems  to  be  greater  than  in  the  guinea  pig; 
but  in  the  latter  the  invasion  of  fat  tissue  by  connective  tissue,  as  a  rule,  is 
more  extensive  than  in  the  rat.  On  the  other  hand,  in  the  rat  the  lymphocytic 
reaction  may  be  somewhat  more  intense. 

We  have,  so  far,  discussed  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantations 
of  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  and  associated  tissues  in  rat  and  guinea 
pig ;  these  were  the  tissues  commonly  used  in  our  investigations.  But  in  addi- 
tion we  have  made  use  of  a  number  of  other  organs  or  tissues ;  from  among 
these  we  shall  select  striated  muscle  in  the  rat,  and  uterus  and  kidney  in  the 
guinea  pig,  for  a  comparison  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  reactions.  Each 
of  these  organs  shows  some  peculiarities  which  are  of  interest  in  the  analysis 
of  the  common  factors  underlying  the  differences  in  the  reactions  against 
autogenous  and  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials. 

7.  Autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantation  of  striated  muscle 
tissue  in  the  rat.  Elson  found  that  after  autogenous  transplantation  of  stri- 
ated muscle  tissue,  the  latter  remains  preserved  for  at  least  six  months,  and 
probably  indefinitely.  During  the  first  few  days  the  greater  portion  of  this 
tissue  became  necrotic  and  was  invaded  by  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes, 
which  were  attracted  either  by  the  necrotic  material  or  by  some  accidental 
bacterial  products ;  they  disappeared  again  after  a  few  days.  After  four  days 
a  proliferation  of  the  muscle  nuclei  set  in,  and  this  was  quite  marked  after  six 
days,  the  nuclei  lying  in  long  slender  muscle  spindles,  many  of  which  developed 
cross-striations.  Gradually  the  latter  became  more  definite,  while  some  of  the 
nuclei  disappeared  and  others  assumed  a  more  peripheral  situation.  At  fifteen 


46  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

days,  the  muscle  tissue  consisted  chiefly  of  long  slender  fibers,  with  good 
cross-striations  and  an  increase  of  muscle  nuclei  as  compared  to  the  normal 
number.  By  this  time  the  lymphocytes,  which  at  first  were  present  in  small 
numbers,  had  almost  or  completely  disappeared.  At  28  days  the  muscle,  except 
for  slight  signs  of  degeneration  in  a  few  areas,  appeared  mature  and  normal 
in  almost  every  respect.  Conditions  were  similar  when  the  transplanted  muscle 
was  about  at  the  height  of  its  development.  Later  on  there  was  some  invasion 
by  fibroblasts  and  the  muscle  fibers  became  small ;  but  there  was  still  some  in- 
crease in  nuclei  and  in  connective  tissue  cells  and  lymphocytes.  It  was  pre- 
sumably the  abnormal  situation  and  the  lack  of  the  normal  function  of  the 
transplanted  muscle  which  led  to  the  slight  pathological  changes  noticeable  at 
this  time. 

After  homoiotransplantation  of  striated  muscle  tissue  there  were  fewer 
regenerative  growth  processes  in  the  first  period  and  much  more  degeneration, 
on  account  of  an  invasion  of  the  transplants  by  lymphocytes,  and,  to  a  less 
extent,  by  connective  tissue  at  subsequent  periods.  Thus  homoiotransplanted 
muscle  disappeared  much  earlier  than  autotransplanted  muscle,  no  well- 
preserved  tissue  being  present  at  50  days.  This  result  was  due  to  the  primary 
action  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  which  were  inadequate  for  the  homoio- 
genous  graft,  which  injured  it  and  interfered  with  its  growth  processes;  and 
it  was  secondarily  the  result  of  the  activity  of  the  host  cells,  which  led  to 
further  and,  in  the  end,  total  destruction  of  the  muscle  tissue,  at  a  time  when 
the  autogenous  muscle  was  well  preserved.  The  growth  processes,  which  take 
place  in  the  muscle  following  a  primary  degeneration  of  its  major  portion, 
represent  less  true  regenerative  processes  than  those  of  compensatory  hyper- 
trophy, consisting  in  an  increase  in  sarcoplasm  and  a  multiplication  of  nuclei. 

While  in  the  autotransplanted  muscle  a  nuclear  proliferation  was  seen  as 
early  as  four  days  after  transplantation,  it  was  lacking  at  this  time  in  the 
homoiotransplanted  muscle.  In  the  latter  there  appeared  at  six  days  a  slight 
lymphocytic  reaction  and  there  were  also  fewer  muscle  fibers  and  a  smaller 
number  of  well  developed  nuclei  in  the  homoiotransplants.  At  ten  days  the 
lymphocytic  reaction  increased  in  intensity,  some  muscle  fibers  degenerated, 
but  other  muscle  fibers  remained  and  underwent  still  a  slight  proliferation  of 
nuclei.  There  was  thus,  in  the  early  periods  after  transplantation,  a  balancing 
between  growth  processes  and  degenerative  processes.  Later,  the  invasion  of 
the  muscle  by  lymphocytes  and  its  destruction  increased.  At  32  days  there  was 
an  intense  lymphocytic  reaction,  which  more  or  less  completely  took  the  place 
of  the  muscle  transplant.  However,  there  were  a  few  small  nucleated  muscle 
spindles  or  fibers  with  cross-striation.  The  invasion  of  lymphocytes  continued 
to  increase  and  at  the  same  time  connective  tissue  cells  of  the  host  participated 
in  the  process  of  destruction  of  the  graft.  At  50  days,  only  a  few  remnants  of 
muscle  tissue  were  found,  and  at  70  days  there  was  a  maximum  of  lymphocytic 
reaction  coinciding  with  a  minimum  in  the  preservation  of  the  muscle  tissue. 
At  118  days,  no  muscle  tissue  was  seen;  its  place  had  been  taken  by  lympho- 
cytes, connective  tissue  and  a  few  small  blood  vessels. 

Hence,  while  the  type  of  growth  processes  that  occur  in  the  muscle  grafts  is 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  47 

the  same  after  homoio-  and  after  allotransplantation,  these  growth  processes 
were  less  intense  after  homoiotransplantation  and,  instead,  degenerative 
processes  predominated,  largely  due  to  the  activity  of  lymphocytes  and  con- 
nective tissue.  But  there  was  here  also  a  primary  injury  of  the  transplant  by 
homoiotoxins  carried  to  the  graft  by  the  bodyfluids,  which  corresponds  to  the 
rinding  of  Hesselberg  in  the  transplanted  thyroid  of  the  guinea  pig,  and  which 
has  been  observed  by  us  also  in  this  species  in  transplanted  unstriated  muscle 
tissue  of  the  uterus  and  in  the  placentoma  formation  in  transplanted  pieces  of 
uterus.  The  peculiarity  of  the  growth  processes  in  muscle  grafts,  which  tend 
to  repair  the  degenerative  processes,  consists  in  the  fact  that  they  have  to 
contend  with  factors  unfavorable  to  growth,  similar  to  those  which  are  found 
in  liver  tissue  or  in  those  parts  of  the  epidermis  which  are  farther  removed 
from  the  source  of  nourishment,  or  in  the  connective  tissue  in  the  neighbor- 
hood of  foreign  bodies. 

8.  In  experiments  carried  out  with  Hesselberg  and  Kerwin,  autogenous 
and  homoiogenous  transplantations  of  the  uterus  were  compared.  Pieces  of 
uterus  were  transplanted  either  into  subcutaneous  pockets  in  the  abdominal 
wall  or  in  the  ear  of  the  guinea  pig.  The  latest  period  at  which  homoiogenous 
pieces  were  found  in  pockets  in  the  ear  was  after  16  days,  and  in  the  abdominal 
wall,  after  24  days.  In  the  former,  conditions  for  the  survival  of  the  transplant 
are  more  unfavorable  than  in  the  latter;, at  later  periods,  only  hyaline  tissue 
with  some  clusters  of  lymphocytes  were  found  as  remnants  of  the  homoio- 
transplants.  The  autotransplants  were  well  preserved  after  35  days  and  would 
presumably  have  lived  indefinitely.  At  that  time  they  showed  good  preservation 
of  the  uterine  surface  epithelium  and  the  glands,  in  both  of  which  there  was 
mitotic  proliferation;  strands  of  connective  tissue  separated  groups  of  glands, 
without  compressing  them,  because  the  connective  tissue  remained  cellular- 
fibrillar  or  myxoid  near  the  epithelium,  without  becoming  fibrous ;  also,  the 
unstriated  muscle  tissue  was  well  preserved  and  in  connective  tissue  as  well  as 
in  unstriated  muscle  occasional  mitoses  were  found. 

Three  periods  can  be  distinguished  as  far  as  the  fate  of  these  transplants 
is  concerned.  In  the  first  five  or  six  days  there  is  no  marked  difference  between 
autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants.  During  the  second  period,  lasting 
from  the  6th  to  the  20th  day,  differences  develop  between  the  autogenous  and 
homoiogenous  tissues,  and  in  the  third  period  the  latter  are  in  the  process  of 
destruction,  while  the  former  are  well  preserved.  In  both  auto-  and  homio- 
transplants  the  tissue  is  shrunken  during  the  first  few  days,  owing  to  the  in- 
sufficient nourishment  provided  during  this  period ;  they  not  only  recover  from 
this  condition  later,  but  a  new  formation  of  tissue,  as  indicated  by  the  occur- 
rence of  mitoses  in  various  tissues,  takes  place.  Also,  the  connective  tissue 
recovers ;  it  has  a  myxoid,  cellular  character  near  the  epithelium  and  it  shows 
mitoses.  A  part  of  the  connective  tissue  is  derived  from  the  transplant,  but 
other  growing  connective  tissue  has  its  origin  in  the  host.  The  second  period 
begins  at  about  the  6th  day,  and  on  the  7th  day,  when  the  transplanted  uterine 
epithelium  forms  a  cyst  with  papillae,  differences  between  the  autogenous 
and  homoiogenous  transplants  set  in.  Mitoses  are  found  in  the  cellular-myxoid 


48  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

connective  tissue  in  the  autotransplant  and,  in  general,  there  are  many  mitoses 
here.  In  the  homoiotransplant  the  epithelium  is  flatter,  there  are  more  lympho- 
cytes and  the  connective  tissue  has  a  more  fibrillar-cellular  character.  The 
unstriated  muscle  tissue  is  either  lacking  or  it  is  invaded  by  connective  tissue 
in  the  homoiotransplant.  However,  certain  variations  as  to  the  differences  be- 
tween autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants  occur  in  individual  cases ; 
but  on  the  whole,  the  recovery  of  the  autogenous  tissue  is  better  and  especially 
the  myxoid  connective  tissue  and  unstriated  muscle  are  better  preserved  in 
the  autotransplant  and  there  are  here  fewer  lymphocytes.  In  the  homoiotrans- 
plant, the  epithelial  cyst  remains  incomplete  and  there  is  more  necrotic  tissue, 
but  even  in  this  kind  of  graft  the  lymphocytes  are  not  present  in  large  masses 
and  they  are  not  very  injurious  during  the  second  week  and  first  half  of  the 
third  week,  but  they  may  destroy  the  uterine  glands  and  injure  the  surface 
epithelium. 

In  the  homoiotransplant  the  connective  tissue  still  invades  the  unstriated 
muscle  tissue  and  gradually  during  the  latter  part  of  the  third  and  the  begin- 
ning of  the  fourth  week  the  lymphocytes  become  more  frequent  around  and  in 
the  graft,  and  very  little  myxoid  connective  tissue  or  muscle  tissue  is,  at  this 
time,  to  be  observed.  The  surface  epithelium,  some  glands,  and  the  peritoneal 
epithelium  are  more  resistant  to  the  action  of  the  homoiotoxins  than  are  the 
myxoid  connective  tissue  and  the  unstriated  muscle  tissue.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  amount  of  hyaline  connective  tissue  increases,  at  least  partly  on  account 
of  the  progressive  organization  of  the  necrotic  material.  In  the  middle  of  the 
4th  week,  the  latest  period  at  which  living  homoiotransplanted  tissue  was 
seen,  few  mitoses  were  found  in  the  epithelium,  although  this  epithelium  and 
the  peritoneal  endothelium  were  relatively  best  preserved,  while  the  myxoid 
connective  tissue  and  the  muscle  tissue  were  replaced  by  fibrillar  and  hyaline 
connective  tissue. 

It  follows  from  these  experiments  that  great  parts  of  the  homoiotransplanted 
uterus  are  primarily  damaged  by  the  action  of  the  homoiotoxins,  that  uterine 
tissues  attract  the  lymphocytes  less  strongly  than  do  kidney  and  thyroid,  and 
that  these  cells  are  of  less  significance  in  uterus  than  in  thyroid  and  kidney.  In 
uterus  transplants  the  lymphocytes  contribute  only  secondarily  to  the  destruc- 
tion of  the  graft  and  then  chiefly  through  their  action  on  the  epithelial  struc- 
tures. Thyroid  and  kidney  are  largely  epithelial  structures,  they  are  less 
affected  by  the  body  fluids  of  the  homoiogenous  host,  although  a  primary  effect 
of  the  strange  bodyfluids  may  be  exerted  also  on  these  organs;  but,  in  the 
main,  their  destruction  is  brought  about  by  lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue 
cells.  It  is  probable  that  without  the  injurious  action  of  these  cells  of  the  host, 
the  homoiogenous  thyroid  and  kidney  would  survive  longer  than  the  homoiog- 
enous uterus  transplants.  The  latter  tissues  cannot  recover  as  well  from  the 
primary  injury  caused  by  the  process  of  transplantation,  nor  can  their  epi- 
thelium induce  or  maintain  the  myxoid-cellular  character  of  the  stroma  as  well 
as  autogenous  tissues.  Furthermore,  the  tissues  that  have  recovered  cannot 
maintain  themselves  permanently  in  the  homoiotransplants  because  of  the  in- 
adequacy of  the  bodyfluids.  The  changes  produced  in  the  stroma  react  un- 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  49 

favorably  also  on  the  epithelium  and  a  vicious  circle  is  thus  established  in  the 
epithelium-stroma  relations.  Also,  the  uterine  epithelium  is  not  seriously  af- 
fected by  the  homoiotoxins,  if  at  all ;  but  secondarily,  the  epithelium  is  injured 
by  the  lymphocytes.  While  the  lymphocytes  appear  at  about  as  early  a  time  in 
or  around  the  homoiogenous  uterine  tissues  as  around  the  corresponding 
thyroid  and  kidney  tissues,  in  the  latter  the  lymphocytic  reaction  becomes  much 
stronger  than  in  the  former.  The  resistance  of  the  epithelial  structures  in  the 
homoiogenous  uterus  is  indicated  also  by  the  fact  that  mitotic  proliferation 
continues  actively  in  the  transplanted  uterine  epithelium  much  longer  than  in 
thyroid  and  kidney. 

9.  The  effect  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  bodyfluids  on  the  devel- 
opment of  placentomata  in  the  transplanted  uterus.  If  the  non-transplanted 
uterus  has  been  sensitized  by  the  corpus  luteum  hormone  about  five  to  eight 
days  after  estrus,  incisions  into  the  uterine  horn  or  introduction  of  foreign 
bodies  into  the  uterus  call  forth  the  production  of  placentomata,  which  reach 
their  full  development  in  about  ten  days,  while  at  a  still  later  period  regression 
of  these  newformations  sets  in.  If  instead  of  making  incisions  into  the  uterine 
mucosa  in  situ,  we  autotransplant  pieces  of  the  sensitized  uterus  about  six  days 
after  estrus,  the  mechanical  stimulation  due  to  the  process  of  transplantation 
likewise  leads  to  placentoma  formation  in  the  transplanted  periglandular  con- 
nective tissue,  which  proliferates  actively  by  means  of  mitoses.  At  the  height 
of  the  development,  pearls  and  also  giant  nuclei  may  form  in  certain  areas  in 
the  placentoma;  the  other  uterine  tissues  are  well  preserved  and  lymphocytes 
are  absent,  but  some  spindle-cell  connective  tissue  with  mitoses  may  grow  into 
the  placentoma  and  destroy  parts  of  it. 

If  pieces  of  the  uterus  are  homoiotransplanted  instead  of  autotransplanted, 
the  results  differ  in  accordance  with  the  availability  of  corpus  luteum  hor- 
mones in  the  host ;  however,  even  under  the  most  favorable  hormonal  condi- 
tions the  homoiotoxins  always  tend  to  exert  an  injurious  effect  on  the  trans- 
plants. If  the  homoiotransplantation  is  made  into  guinea  pigs,  in  which  estrus 
has  taken  place  about  six  days  previous  to  transplantation,  in  the  large  ma- 
jority of  the  animals  only  traces  of  or  very  slight  placentomata  developed,  or 
none.  Occasionally,  large  placentomata  developed,  but  in  this  case  there 
seemed  to  be  more  necrosis  in  these  homoiogenous  than  in  the  autogenous 
structures;  also,  moderate  or  even  marked  lymphocytic  infiltration  could  be 
found  about  10  or  11  days  after  transplantation  in  some  of  the  connective 
tissue  of  the  transplant. 

In  five  pregnant  guinea  pigs,  pieces  of  uterus  were  homoiotransplanted.  In 
two  animals  no  placentomata  developed,  while  in  three  there  were  small 
placentomatous  areas.  Lymphocytic  infiltration  in  the  surrounding  tissue  was 
moderate,  or,  in  places,  more  marked,  and  it  was  found  also  directly  in  the 
placentomatous  formations ;  again,  the  ingrowth  of  spindle-cell  connective 
tissue  could  destroy  and  replace  part  of  the  placentomata.  After  transplanta- 
tion of  the  uterus  pieces  into  male  or  into  sexually  immature  female  guinea 
pigs,  no  placentomata  developed  and  the  degree  of  lymphocytic  infiltration 
varied  in  different  cases. 


50  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

In  the  development  of  placentomata  in  the  homoiogenous  uterus  of  the 
guinea  pig  we  see  another  example  of  a  direct  injurious  action  of  the  homoio- 
toxins  present  in  the  circulating  bodyfluids,  which  damaged  the  mucosa  of  the 
uterine  transplant  to  such  an  extent  that  the  formation  of  placentomata  was 
either  prevented  or  much  reduced  under  conditions  in  which  normally  the 
sensitizing  hormones  would  have  made  these  growth  processes  possible.  There 
was,  then,  a  struggle  between  the  sensitizing  hormones  and  the  homoio- 
toxins ;  only  in  a  few  instances  was  the  hormone  action,  in  conjunction  with 
the  mechanical  stimulation  due  to  the  trauma,  able  to  overcome  the  injurious 
effect  of  the  homoiotoxins.  The  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  quantitatively  so 
weak  that  the  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host  cells  could  not  be  held  responsi- 
ble for  these  growth-depressing  effects. 

10.  Transplantation  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  kidney  tissue.  The 
process  of  transplantation  initiates  tissue  reactions  in  the  host  and 
changes  in  the  transplant.  These  may  be  due  to  general  factors  common  to 
autogenous  and  homoiogenous  tissue;  in  addition,  there  are  the  specific  re- 
actions due  to  the  varying  degrees  of  incompatibility  of  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  These  differences  in  individuality  differ- 
entials activate  the  formerly  quiescent  host  tissues  in  accordance  with  the  in- 
herited, constitutional  characteristics  of  the  latter.  Furthermore,  by  comparing 
the  reactions  in  tissues  transplanted  into  different  locations,  the  general  injury 
to  the  tissues  is  found  to  vary  in  degree;  in  a  particularly  unfavorable  situa- 
tion, with  increasing  injury  to  the  transplant,  the  general,  less  specific  reac- 
tions of  various  tissues  which  are  caused  by  the  injury,  may  dominate  over 
the  more  specific  reactions  which  are  induced  by  incompatibility  between  the 
individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  It  is  in  order  to  analyze 
still  further  these  characteristics  of  tissues  that  we  shall  record  the  principal 
observations  as  to  the  differences  between  autogenous  and  homoiogenous 
transplants  of  kidney  tissue  in  the  guinea  pig.  Greater  damage  is  suffered  by 
these  grafts,  for  instance,  after  transfer  into  pockets  in  the  ear  of  guinea 
pig  than  into  pockets  in  the  subcutaneous  tissues  of  the  abdominal  wall  or  of 
the  dorsum.  This  is  true  of  both  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  tissue  and  both 
may  die  after  some  time,  although  the  latter  is  earlier  destroyed;  also,  the 
specific  differences  between  these  two  types  of  transplantation  are  less  evident 
in  ear  transplants  than  in  those  in  the  subcutaneous  tissue  of  the  anterior  or 
posterior  wall  of  the  abdomen.  Likewise,  homoiotransplants  of  uterine  tissue 
are  destroyed  more  rapidly  in  the  ear  than  in  the  abdominal  wall. 

After  transplantation  into  the  ear  of  pieces  of  kidney,  destruction  of 
homoiogenous  tissue  was  complete  after  21  days,  while  the  autogenous  tissue, 
although  injured  by  the  ingrowing  connective  tissue,  was  not  yet  quite  de- 
stroyed at  38  days.  Transplanted  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue  of  the  abdominal 
wall,  both  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  kidney  tissue  was  preserved  for  at 
least  30  days,  and  it  probably  remained  alive  for  a  still  longer  period.  These 
differences  were  presumably  due  to  the  greater  pressure  exerted  on  the  grafted 
tissue  in  the  ear  and,  perhaps,  also  to  a  less  satisfactory  blood  vessel  supply  in 
this  region.  The  same  factors  caused  also  a  much  more  marked  lymphocytic 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  51 

infiltration  of  the  homoiogenous  tissue  in  the  back  of  the  abdominal  wall  than 
in  the  ear.  In  the  autogenous  transplants  there  were  occasional  lymphocytes 
around  the  tubules  or  in  the  capillaries  of  glomeruli,  especially  in  places  where 
the  connective  tissue  was  increased  around  the  tubules,  but  often  they  were 
entirely  absent,  while  they  were  very  prominent  in  homoiogenous  pieces,  es- 
pecially in  those  transplanted  into  the  abdominal  wall. 

The  lymphocytic  infiltration  is  distinct  after  nine  days  in  homoiotransplants, 
after  which  period  it  increases  gradually — this  applies  also  to  transplants  in 
the  ear,  although  here  it  is  less  prominent.  Lymphocytes  collect  around  the 
kidney  transplant  and  penetrate  into  the  lumen  of  the  tubules  as  well  as  into 
the  glomeruli,  isolating  and  helping  to  destroy  and  replace  the  tubules.  The 
destruction  of  tubules  by  these  cells  can  be  seen  at  ten  days  after  transplanta- 
tion and  it  persists  from  then  on.  In  the  central  necrotic  or  organized  area  they 
are  present  in  smaller  numbers.  However,  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  re- 
action varies  in  different  homoiotransplants ;  it  apparently  is  not  prevented  nor 
even  noticeably  diminished  by  a  loss  of  even  as  much  as  one-half  of  the  weight 
of  the  host.  This  reaction  was  similar  in  strength  in  thyroid  and  in  kidney ;  in 
both  these  organs,  after  homoiotransplantation,  it  became  noticeable  at  about 
the  same  time  and  gradually  progressed.  If  a  bacterial  infection  takes  place, 
the  tissue  at  some  distance  from  the  place  of  infection  may  remain  preserved, 
and  the  infection  does  not  call  forth  a  lymphocytic  reaction  in  autogenous 
transplants  nor  does  it  noticeably  increase  it  in  the  case  of  homoiotransplants ; 
but  ordinarily  already  the  lymphocytic  reaction  is  marked  around  and  in 
homoiotransplanted  kidney.  As  we  have  stated,  in  homoiotransplanted  tissue 
of  the  mouse  it  seems  that  bacterial  infection  may  increase  the  intensity  of 
the  lymphocytic  reaction. 

While  the  degree  of  compatibility  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant  largely  determines  the  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  lympho- 
cytes, the  less  specific  factors  of  injury  sustained  by  the  transplants  during  and 
following  the  transplantation,  the  unfavorable  conditions  in  the  transplant, 
caused  by  its  strange  situation,  and  the  difficulty  of  entering  into  normal  rela- 
tions with  the  new  tissues  surrounding  it  are,  to  a  greater  extent,  responsible 
for  the  activity  of  the  fibroblasts  and  the  production  of  fibrous  tissue.  The 
organismal  differentials  are  of  less  significance  in  these  latter  changes,  al- 
though they  are  still  important.  In  both  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  tissues 
the  connective  tissue  grows  between  the  tubules  and  glomeruli  of  the  peripheral 
zone  and  progresses  towards  the  central  necrotic  material.  However,  a  larger 
number  of  fibroblasts  seem  to  grow  into  the  homoiotransplants;  this  is  es- 
pecially clear  following  the  first  two  weeks,  when  the  injury  due  to  the  opera- 
tion has  in  great  part  subsided.  In  the  autogenous  transplants  the  closely  ap- 
proximated tubules  are  arranged  in  lobules  and  it  is  the  lobules  which  are 
separated  by  connective  tissue,  whereas,  in  the  homoiotransplants  the  individ- 
ual tubules  are  separated  by  connective  tissue;  but  strands  of  connective  tissue 
may  surround  some  individual  tubules  also  in  autotransplants.  Through  the 
exertion  of  pressure  by  this  tissue  the  lumen  of  the  central  tubules  is  obliter- 
ated or  shrunken.  But  in  addition  there  may  be  atrophy  as  a  result  of  insuffi- 


52  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

cient  nourishment.  The  mechanism  underlying  these  relations  of  the  connective 
tissue  to  various  types  or  degrees  of  injury  of  the  parenchyma  is,  as  yet,  very 
little  understood.  Stereotropic  reactions,  movements  in  contact  with  strange 
foreign  bodies,  perhaps  chemotropic  activity  elicited  by  necrotic  tissue,  as  well 
as  other  altered  relations  between  the  more  specific  parenchymatous  tissue  and 
the  surrounding  stroma,  may  form  the  stimulus  for  both  movements  and  in- 
crease in  size  and  multiplication  of  cells  in  the  surrounding  connective  tissue. 
It  is  these  factors  which  may  ultimately  lead  also  to  the  destruction  of  auto- 
genous skin  cysts  in  the  guinea  pig,  which  form  after  subcutaneous  trans- 
plantation of  epidermis  with  the  underlying  connective  tissue.  Here  the  sur- 
rounding connective  tissue  may  grow  stereotropically  along  the  hairs  of  the 
skin  into  the  interior  of  the  cyst,  where  it  separates  and  surrounds  the  keratin 
lamellae.  Thus  after  some  time  the  host  connective  tissue  may  bring  about  the 
destruction  of  autogenous  subcutaneous  skin  transplants ;  but  in  addition  there 
develop  specific  lymphocytic  reactions  around  homoiogenous  skin  grafts. 

The  size  and  character  of  the  central  necrotic  area  in  transplanted  kidney 
varies  in  different  animals ;  the  organizing  fibroblasts  grow  first  between  and 
along  the  necrotic  tubules  and  then  into  the  tubules.  As  the  result  of  the  organi- 
zation of  the  fibroblasts  the  necrotic  material  becomes  hyaline ;  in  addiion,  the 
latter  is  taken  up  by  phagocytes,  which  thus  aid  in  its  removal.  On  the  whole, 
on  account  of  the  relative  hardness  of  the  necrotic  kidney  tissue,  the  organiza- 
tion progresses  slowly  and  with  unequal  rapidity  in  different  hosts ;  it  may  re- 
quire 20  days  or  even  longer  for  this  process  to  be  completed.  Following  or- 
ganization of  the  autotransplanted  thyroid,  as  we  have  stated,  the  central 
necrotic  part  after  some  time  becomes  cellular  and  small  in  size,  but  the 
homoiotransplanted  thyroid  is  fibrous-hyaline  and  large.  However,  in  the  kid- 
ney there  is  no  marked  difference  between  the  condition  of  the  central  parts  in 
autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants,  because  in  both,  the  necrotic  kid- 
ney tissue  is  resistant  to  the  action  of  the  organizing  host  cells.  The  principal 
difference  between  the  two  types  of  kidney  transplants  consists  in  the  number 
of  lymphocytes  and  of  fibroblasts  and  in  the  amount  of  connective  tissue  in  the 
peripheral  living  area. 

The  tubules  in  the  transplanted  kidney  are  simple  and  similar  to  the  collect- 
ing tubules.  The  glomeruli  are  small  and  tend  to  be  hyaline.  There  are  frequent 
mitoses  in  the  tubules  between  five  and  seven  days ;  at  nine  days  a  mitosis  was 
found  in  a  glomerulus.  From  the  7th  or  8th  day  on,  a  decrease  in  their  num- 
ber occurs,  but  they  are  found  even  after  27  days,  although  not  after  30  days, 
in  both  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants.  The  mitotic  activity  may, 
at  least  for  some  time,  be  as  great  in  the  latter  as  in  the  former,  or  even  greater. 
As  a  result  of  the  transplantation  a  chain  of  changes  is  initiated  in  the  trans- 
plant, irrespective  of  the  character  of  the  individuality  differentials,  and  these 
changes  lead  to  mitotic  cell  proliferation;  gradually  this  reaction  curve  de- 
clines, and  at  last  a  new  equilibrium  is  reached  in  which  cell  proliferation 
ceases,  although  the  original  normal  condition  of  the  transplant  has  not  been 
restored.  These  curves  of  changes  are  similar  in  thyroid,  kidney  and  uterus 
transplants,  although  some  differences  exist.  It  is  possible  that  in  homoio- 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  53 

transplants,  to  the  primary  injury  which  initiates  the  regenerative  processes 
is  added  the  secondary  injury  inflicted  on  the  tubules  by  lymphocytes  and  con- 
nective tissue  cells;  this  second  factor  may  cause  increased  mitotic  prolifera- 
tion, provided  enough  tubule  tissue  is  left  to  respond  with  such  activity. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  the  difference  between  autogenous  and  homoio- 
genous  transplants  of  kidney  pieces  in  the  later  stages  is  due  to  the  more  rapid 
destruction  of  the  regenerating  tubules  in  the  latter  grafts,  rather  than  to  a 
primary  difference  in  the  actual  development  and  growth  of  kidney  tissue, 
which  almost  ceases  on  or  about  the  14th  day  after  transplantation,  although  a 
slight  regenerative  process  may  occur  at  a  still  later  date.  The  damage  to  the 
tissue  begins  on  about  the  9th  day  and  in  the  homoiotransplant  destruction  is 
almost  complete  21  days  after  transplantation.  The  activity  of  the  connective 
tissue  destroys  also  the  autotransplant,  which  has  been  injured  through  the 
abnormal  conditions  in  which  it  lives,  especially  in  the  ear;  this  activity  is 
therefore,  at  least  partly,  an  injury  reaction,  which  may  develop  in  autogenous 
as  well  as  in  homoiogenous  transplants.  In  contrast  to  the  connective  tissue 
cells,  the  lymphocytes  react  more  specifically  to  homoiotoxins  which  are 
present  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  and  in  the  transplanted  tissue  itself ;  these 
toxic  substances  are  both  involved,  partly  directly,  partly  indirectly,  in  the 
activity  of  the  lymphocytes,  but,  to  a  certain  extent,  also  in  that  of  the  con- 
nective tissue  elements. 


Chapter  J 

Transplantation  of  Autogenous  and 
Homoiogenous  Tissues  in  Mice 

The  large  majority  of  experiments  which  we  carried  out  in  mice  were 
done  with  closely  inbred  strains,  and  exchange  of  tissues  between 
members  of  the  same  strain  would  therefore  not  correspond  to  homoio- 
genous transplantations  but  to  something  akin  to  autogenous  or  syngenesio- 
transplantation.  Which  of  these  two  types  of  transplantation  it  resembles  more 
would  depend  on  the  degree  and  effects  of  the  inbreeding.  However,  experi- 
ments in  which  tissues  are  transferred  from  one  strain  to  another  strain  would 
be  more  nearly  comparable  to  homoiogenous  transplantations,  although  there 
is  no  absolute  identity  of  inter-strain  transplantation  and  ordinary  homoio- 
transplantation ;  in  the  latter  there  may  be  a  somewhat  greater  variability  in 
the  relations  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  In 
addition  to  the  transplantation  between  different  strains — inter-strain  trans- 
plantation— we  have  also  made  some  experiments  in  which  tissues  were  ex- 
changed between  ordinary  non-inbred  white  mice  obtained  from  various 
dealers.  As  to  autogenous  transplantations,  these  should  not  be  affected  by  the 
inbreeding  and  should  yield  the  same  results  in  closely  inbred,  in  less  closely 
inbred,  and  in  non-inbred  strains. 

Autogenous  transplantation  in  mice.  Autogenous  transplantation  is  in  all 
essential  respects  similar  to  this  type  of  transplantation  in  rat  and  guinea  pig. 
The  tissue  remains  preserved  provided  the  injury  connected  with  the  process 
of  grafting  and  that  due  to  the  abnormal  position  of  the  graft  have  no  long- 
lasting,  unfavorable  effects.  The  changes  which  are  observed  after  auto- 
transplantation  can  not  be  due  to  incompatibility  between  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  since  these  differentials  are  identical,  but 
they  are  due  to  mechanical  or  chemical  factors  of  a  non-specific  kind,  similar 
to  those  which,  under  corresponding  conditions,  might  also  take  place  in  non- 
transplanted  tissues.  On  account  of  vascular  changes  around  the  transplant 
and  of  necrosis  in  the  insufficiently  nourished  portion  of  the  grafted  tissues, 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  may  appear;  lymphocytes  may  be  attracted  by 
non-specific  factors,  such  as  foreign  bodies,  causing  a  mild  degree  of  injury, 
and  epithelioid  and  giant  cells  may  be  produced.  Injury  or  abnormal  growth 
processes  in  non-transplanted  normal  striated  muscle  tissue  may  call  forth  a 
multiplication  of  muscle  nuclei  and  the  formation  of  thinner  muscle  fibers  or 
spindles.  The  same  changes  may  take  place  in  transplanted  muscle.  Dense 
fibrous  tissue  tends  to  form  around  and  sometimes  between  the  living  muscle 
fibers,  and,  at  first,  some  lymphocytes  may  accumulate  between  the  muscle 
fibers.  But  the  lymphocytes  were  not  numerous  in  the  autotransplanted  muscle 
tissue ;  they  were  still  found  at  20  days,  but  no  longer  after  30  days  following 

54 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TISSUES  IN  MICE  55 

transplantation.  Hemorrhages  were  observed  in  the  thyroid  transplant  at  12 
days,  therefore  at  early  periods  after  the  operation,  but  they  also  had  disap- 
peared at  30  days.  In  one  autotransplant  of  thyroid  gland  an  abscess,  due  to 
bacterial  infection,  adjoined  the  graft  in  one  place;  the  ring  of  acini  was 
interrupted  at  this  point,  but  this  condition  did  not  destroy  the  autogenous 
character  of  the  transplant  except  locally.  In  early  periods  following  auto- 
transplantation  the  amount  of  fibrous  tissue  in  the  center  of  the  graft  may  be 
considerable,  owing  to  the  organization  of  the  central  necrotic  tissue ;  but  this 
decreases  later.  In  the  transplanted  fat  tissue,  infiltration  with  lymphocytes,  a 
noticeable  increase  in  connective  tissue,  and  the  presence  of  small  vacuolated 
phagocytic  cells  are  lacking.  Localized  necrosis  of  the  cartilage  may  here  also 
be  followed  by  the  formation  of  a  plate  of  new  cartilage  through  the  regenera- 
tive activity  of  the  perichondrium.  We  have  not  examined  autotransplanted 
mouse  tissue  later  than  30  days  following  transplantation,  but  there  were  al- 
ready some  indications  at  this  period  that  the  effects  of  the  accidental  factors 
we  have  mentioned  disappear  in  the  course  of  time  as  a  result  of  regulatory 
activities  of  the  tissues,  which  take  place  under  autogenous  conditions.  By  a 
comparison  of  the  results  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantation  it 
is  thus  possible  to  separate  a  variety  of  more  or  less  accidental  factors  from 
the  specific  ones  caused  by  the  disharmony  of  individuality  differentials. 

Homoiogenous  transplantation.  This  'consisted  of  two  kinds  of  experi- 
ments, namely,  (1)  an  exchange  of  tissues  between  not  closely  related  tame 
mice  or  between  non-inbred  and  inbred  strains  of  mice,  and  (2)  exchange 
of  tissues  between  closely  inbred  strains  of  mice.  The  second  set  of  experi- 
ments was  first  carried  out,  and  in  this  type  of  homoiogenous  transplantations 
the  connective-tissue  as  well  as  the  lymphocytic  reaction  was  definitely  weaker 
than  in  the  corresponding  transplantations  in  rats  and  guinea  pigs.  There  was 
the  possibility  that  the  relatively  low  intensity  of  these  reactions  was  due  to  the 
close  inbreeding  to  which  these  mice  had  been  subjected.  We  added,  therefore, 
to  these  transplantations,  the  first  series;  but  here  the  results  were  similar, 
indicating  that  these  weak  reactions  are  characteristic  of  the  mouse  and  that 
they  are  not  due  to  the  close  inbreeding.  If  we  make  allowance  for  these  differ- 
ences, the  grades  in  these  transplantations  in  mice  are  otherwise  in  principle 
the  same  as  in  the  experiments  with  rats  or  guinea  pigs.  If  the  thyroid  was 
preserved,  the  relative  incompatibility  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  host 
and  graft  was  indicated  in  many  cases  by  the  stunted  condition  of  this  trans- 
planted organ;  in  addition,  the  organization  of  the  central  necrotic  material 
was,  in  some  instances,  as  yet  imperfect.  There  were  a  number  of  experiments 
in  which,  particularly  in  the  fat  tissue,  there  were  found  either  some  scattered 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  or  even  small  collections  of  these  cells.  In  such 
transplants  there  were,  as  a  rule,  also  an  increased  amount  of  fibrous  tissue 
and  an  increase  in  lymphocytes  visible  in  addition  to  small  vacuolated  cells. 
More  rarely,  a  few  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  were  found  also  in  homoio- 
genous thyroid  or  other  homoiogenous  transplants.  As  already  mentioned, 
there  was  often  some  doubt  as  to  whether  the  presence  of  the  leucocytes  was 
not  due  to  accidental  infections  with  bacteria,  which  could  take  place  more 


56  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

readily  in  mice  than  in  rats  or  guinea  pigs,  because  of  the  greater  difficulty  of 
performing  a  perfectly  sterile  operation  in  the  smaller  animal. 

In  transplantations  of  pieces  of  thyroid,  striated  muscle,  xiphoid  cartilage 
with  fat  tissue,  and  of  ovaries  between  not  closely  inbred  mice,  obtained 
from  different  dealers,  or  from  inbred  D  or  C57  mice  to  the  former,  after 
20  and  30  days  the  grades  ranged  between  1  and  2—,  except  in  one  trans- 
plantation, in  which  the  grade  was  2.  With  the  exception  of  the  latter,  the 
results  were  therefore  characterisitc  of  severe  homoio-reactions.  In  no  case 
was  ovarian  tissue  preserved.  When  grade  1  was  given,  neither  the  muscle  nor 
the  thyroid  transplant  was  preserved;  only  cartilage  and  perichondrium  had 
survived  and  the  fat  tissue  was  partly  infiltrated  with  small  vacuolated  or 
epithelioid  phagocytic  cells  and  with  varying  amounts  of  fibrous  tissue  and 
lymphocytes;  however,  these  reactions  in  the  fat  tissue  were  always  much 
diminished  as  compared  with  those  in  rats  and  guinea  pigs,  except  in  some 
transplants  in  which  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  were  more  pronounced. 
In  general,  the  amount  of  fat  tissue  preserved  was  greater  in  the  mouse  than 
in  the  two  other  species.  In  the  case  in  which  grade  2  was  given,  the  thyroid 
transplant,  while  small,  was  in  a  relatively  good  condition ;  the  center  was 
filled  with  dense  hyaline  tissue  and  the  surrounding  ring  of  acini  was  incom- 
plete; also,  the  parathyroid  was  preserved.  In  the  cartilage-fat  transplant  the 
fat  tissue  was  fairly  well  preserved  but  there  was  here  some  increase  in  fibrous 
tissue  and  there  were  collections  of  lymphocytes.  Parts  of  the  transplanted 
muscle  tissue  were  preserved  and  embedded  in  fibrous  tissue. 

In  an  additional  series  of  experiments  we  exchanged  thyroid,  cartilage  and 
fat  tissue,  with  or  without  bone  or  muscle  tissue,  between  non-inbred  mice  and 
inbred  mice  belonging  to  strains  D,  C57  and  A.  In  these  experiments  the 
grades  also  varied  as  a  rule  between  1  and  2—  ;  in  a  few  cases,  slightly  better 
grades  (2/2—)  were  obtained.  The  reactions  were  usually  more  severe  after 
20  than  after  12  days.  Occasionally  there  was  some  lymphocytic  infiltration  in 
the  thyroid  transplants ;  in  the  fat  tissue  there  was  partial  invasion  by  con- 
nective tissue,  vacuolated  phagocytic  cells  and  lymphocytes. 

Among  the  many  experiments  in  which  tissues  were  exchanged  between 
different  strains  of  inbred  mice,  we  may  mention  one  set  in  particular,  in 
which  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  with  associated  tissues,  as  well  as  pieces 
of  striated  muscle  or  ovary  were  transplanted  into  each  host  and  examination 
took  place  after  20  days.  In  ten  transplantations  to  different  hosts  the  grades 
varied  in  the  individual  cases  between  1  and  2—.  When  grade  1  was  given, 
only  the  cartilage  or  parts  of  cartilage  were  preserved,  but  perichondrial  re- 
generation of  cartilage  could  take  place  around  necrotic  areas.  The  fat  tissue 
as  a  rule  was,  to  a  variable  extent,  invaded  by  small  vacuolated  phagocytic  cells 
and  by  connective  tissue;  infiltration  with  lymphocytes  varied  in  different 
cases ;  also  the  amount  of  preserved  fat  tissue  was  variable,  but  on  the  average, 
the  amount  was  greater  in  these  transplantations  in  mice  than  in  rats  and 
guinea  pigs.  There  were  also  some  collections  of  polymorphonuclear  leuco- 
cytes, especially  in  the  fat  tissue,  and  more  prominently  around  fat  cells  which 
were  enclosed  in  fibrous  tissue.  The  thyroid  was  either  entirely  replaced  by 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TISSUES  IN  MICE  57 

fibrous  tissue  in  cases  in  which  grade  1  was  given,  or  variable  parts  were  pre- 
served ;  in  the  latter  case,  the  transplant  was  stunted,  even  if  an  almost  com- 
plete chain  of  acini  was  found  in  a  fibrous  nodule.  Lymphocytes  could  be  lack- 
ing in  such  grafts,  but  in  other  instances  some  collections  of  lymphocytes 
were  found  in  certain  places ;  the  dense  masses  of  lymphocytes,  which  oc- 
curred so  often  in  rat  and  guinea  pig,  were  as  a  rule  absent  in  the  mouse.  The 
transplanted  striated  muscle  was  either  wholly  necrotic  or  small  numbers  of 
regenerated  muscle  fibers  filled  with  nuclear  chains  could  be  seen.  In  the 
muscle  likewise,  some  lymphocytes  could  accumulate.  The  average  grade  in 
these  ten  transplantations  corresponded  to  1  + . 

We  have  carried  out  in  addition,  several  other  large  series  of  experiments, 
in  which  at  different  times,  extending  over  a  number  of  years,  we  determined 
the  mode  of  reaction  in  the  reciprocal  exchange  of  tissues  between  the  fol- 
lowing inbred  strains  of  mice:  A,  D,  C3H,  CBA,  C57,  Old  Buffalo,  New 
Buffalo,  C,  and  AKA.  A  detailed  discussion  of  these  experiments  will  not  be 
undertaken,  but  a  brief  statement  of  the  principal  results  may  be  made.  The 
examination  took  place,  as  a  rule,  between  12  and  30  days  following  trans- 
plantation ;  injurious  effects,  on  the  average,  increased  with  increasing  time 
of  exposure  to  the  bodyfluids  and  cells  of  the  host.  The  grades  were  changed 
correspondingly.  After  20  and  30  days,  they  varied  in  the  majority  of  cases 
between  1  and  2—  ;  but  in  some  cases  the  grades  were  slightly  higher  than  2  —  , 
without  however  definitely  reaching  2.  Intra-strain  transplantations,  which 
were  carried  out  at  the  same  time,  yielded  higher  grades.  There  was  quite 
generally  a  correspondence  between  the  state  of  preservation  or  injury  of  the 
various  tissues  in  individual  experiments.  However,  this  did  not  necessarily 
involve  a  correspondence  in  the  degree  of  lymphocytic  infiltration,  because  the 
latter  was  often  determined  by  local  factors,  among  which,  perhaps,  local  in- 
fection with  bacteria  played  a  role  in  a  number  of  cases.  While  lymphocytes 
were  by  no  means  present  in  all  homoiotransplants  of  cartilage  and  fat  tissue, 
some  increase  in  connective  tissue  and  infiltration  of  the  fat  tissue  with  small 
vacuolated  phagocytic  cells  was  the  most  frequent  indication  of  the  incom- 
patibility between  the  homoiogenous  hosts  and  transplants.  The  lymphocytic 
infiltration  cannot  serve,  therefore,  as  an  indicator  of  the  relationship  between 
the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor  in  the  mouse  to  the  same 
extent  as  in  guinea  pig  and  rat. 

We  have,  thus,  in  these  inter-strain  transplantations,  to  deal  with  marked 
homoio-reactions  similar  to  those  found  in  transplantations  of  homoiogenous 
tissues  in  rats  and  guinea  pigs.  They  differ  from  the  latter  in  the  decidedly 
decreased  invasion  of  the  grafts  by  lymphocytes  and  by  connective  tissue,  in 
the  frequent  preservation  of  a  stunted  thyroid,  in  which  lymphocytic  infiltra- 
tion was  absent,  and  in  the  usually  much  diminished  organizing  activity  of  the 
connective  tissue.  As  in  the  case  of  the  rat,  so  also  in  the  mouse  the  muscle 
fibers  which  were  transplanted  with  xiphoid  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  were 
relatively  more  resistant  than  the  bone  marrow,  which  was  invariably  de- 
stroyed in  these  homoiotransplants.  Also,  in  the  mouse  the  perichondrium 
was  able  to  regenerate  new  cartilage,  but  the  connective  tissue  cells  seemed 


58  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  penetrate  less  readily  into  necrotic  areas  in  the  cartilage  than  in  the  rat.  On 
the  whole,  it  is  evident  that  in  the  mouse  the  injury  and  destruction  of  homoio- 
genous  tissues  by  the  bodyfluids  preponderate  over  the  damage  inflicted  by 
lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue,  and  that  the  activity  of  the  latter  may  or 
may  not  be  added  to  the  action  of  the  homoiotoxins  of  the  circulating  body- 
fluids. 

From  our  observations,  it  follows  that  transplantation  of  thyroid  gland, 
cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  together  with  the  associated  tissues,  cannot  serve  as 
accurately  as  an  indicator  of  the  relationship  between  the  individuality  differ- 
entials of  host  and  transplant  in  mouse  as  in  rat  and  guinea  pig.  It  is  ad- 
visable wherever  possible  to  use,  in  addition  to  these  transplants,  grafts  of 
ovaries  and  of  striated  muscle.  A  comparison  of  the  effects  of  transplantation 
on  a  combination  of  these  various  organs  may  then  serve  as  a  good  indicator 
of  the  degree  of  compatibility  or  incompatibility  between  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  donor. 


Chapter  /J. 

Autogenous,  Syngenesious,  Homoiogenous  and 
Interracial  Transplantations  in  Birds 

In  our  experiments  with  Addison,  in  which  we  compared  the  homoio- 
transplantation  of  pigeon  skin  with  the  transplantation  of  this  tissue  into 
chickens,  into  various  mammalian  species,  and  also  into  amphibia,  we 
found  a  marked  difference  between  the  results  of  homoio-  and  heterotrans- 
plantation. In  the  former,  the  lymphocytes  of  the  host  were  the  principal 
agent  which  injured  and  in  the  end  destroyed  the  transplant,  whereas,  in  the 
latter  it  was  the  toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids  which  injured  the  transplants, 
caused  a  cessation  of  the  proliferative  power  of  the  epidermis  and,  soon  after- 
wards, destroyed  it  altogether.  After  heterotransplantation,  this  destruction 
was  accomplished  usually  as  early  as  during  the  first  and  second  week,  while 
after  homoiotransplantation  it  took  place  in  some  cases  during  the  fourth 
week,  but  in  other  cases  transplants  were  found  alive,  at  least  partly,  as  late 
as  during  the  fifth  week. 

While  thus  the  distinction  between  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  trans- 
plants was  quite  sharp,  and  while  there  was  also  at  least  some  indication  that 
among  the  various  types  of  heterotransplants  there  was,  under  certain  condi- 
tions, a  correspondence  between  compatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials 
and  the  degree  of  genetic  relationship  between  the  species,  which  served  as 
hosts  and  donors,  no  attempt  had  been  made  in  these  experiments  to  analyze 
the  finer  differences  in  birds,  which  might  be  expected  to  exist  between  autog- 
enous, syngenesious,  homoiogenous  and  interracial  transplantations.  Nor 
did  the  subsequent  experiments  of  Schultz,  nor  those  of  Danforth  and  Foster, 
give  any  information  in  this  respect,  although  the  latter  in  particular  were  of 
interest  from  other  points  of  view.  Danforth  and  Foster,  in  experiments  with 
Leghorn  and  Plymouth  Rock  chickens,  transplanted  skin  flaps  from  recently 
hatched  chicks  to  other  chicks  of  the  same  inbred  race  or  to  other  races.  In 
many  cases  the  pieces  of  skin  healed  in  permanently  in  chicks  belonging  to 
other  races,  although  the  best  results  were  obtained  in  the  exchange  of  skin 
between  members  of  the  same  inbred  race;  but  this  may  have  been  due  to 
accidental  factors  rather  than  to  a  similarity  of  the  organismal  differentials 
between  host  and  transplant.  Danforth  and  Foster  concluded  that  individuality 
differentials  exist  in  birds  in  isolated  instances.  However,  the  fact  that  they 
used  recently  hatched  chicks  rather  than  adult  birds  made  the  recognition  of 
differences  between  individuality  differentials  more  difficult,  because  in  these 
very  young  animals  the  reaction  against  strange  individuality  differentials 
should  be  milder  or,  under  certain  conditions,  lacking  altogether ;  in  addition, 
in  these  long  term  experiments  a  gradual  adaptation  between  host  and  graft 
might  take  place.  Furthermore,  the  use  of  healing-in  or  lack  of  healing-in  of 

59 


60  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  skin  flaps  represents  an  "all  or  nothing"  test,  which  cannot  give  any  in- 
dication of  intermediate  results  which  might  be  found  by  means  of  a  micro- 
scopic study  of  cellular  reactions.  Experiments  in  which  we  used  microscopic 
studies  of  the  cellular  reactions  against  transplants  in  adult  birds  showed  that 
there  is  no  identity  between  individuality  differentials  even  in  brothers  be- 
longing to  the  same  inbred  race.  Likewise,  it  may  be  found  that  in  adult  lizards 
homoiotransplantation  of  skin  does  not  succeed,  whereas  autotransplantation 
is  successful  (May).  By  means  of  statistical  analysis  Kozelka  found  in  skin 
grafts  in  Leghorn  fowl,  within  the  first  few  months  after  hatching,  strong 
indications  that  the  degree  of  relationship  between  donor  and  host,  which 
signifies  also  the  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  donor,  is  one  of  the  factors  which  determines  the  success  of  the  trans- 
plantations. Thus  he  found  a  persistence  of  grafts  between  unrelated  birds  in 
18  per  cent,  between  half  and  full  brothers  and  sisters  in  27  per  cent,  between 
full  brothers  and  sisters  in  SO  per  cent,  and  between  offspring  from  father 
and  daughter  matings  in  68  per  cent  of  the  transplantations.  Similar  to  our 
experiences,  he  noted  a  correspondence  in  the  behavior  of  several  transplants 
from  the  same  donor  to  the  same  host.  However,  also  non-genetic  factors, 
such  as  size  or  age  of  the  donor  and  of  the  host,  helped  to  determine  the  fate 
of  the  transplants.  In  accordance  with  expectation,  transplantations  between 
adult  birds  gave  less  favorable  results  than  those  between  very  young  chicks, 
but  in  both  instances  the  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  graft  was  the  essential  factor  that  determined  the  result  of  the 
transplantation. 

In  continuing  our  former  experiments  in  birds,  we  made  use  first  of  inbred 
races  of  chickens,  which  we  obtained  from  the  Mount  Hope  Farm  in  Williams- 
town,  Mass.,  through  the  kindness  of  Dr.  Goodale.  In  these  experiments  we 
observed  that  notwithstanding  close  inbreeding,  there  was  a  marked  lympho- 
cytic reaction  present,  even  around  transplants  in  nearly  related  adult  animals 
belonging  to  the  same  inbred  race.  This  reaction  was  so  strong  that  a  definite 
and  very  distinct  differentiation  between  the  degree  of  similarity  of  individ- 
uality differentials  in  these  animals  seemed  impossible  and  our  investigations 
remained,  therefore,  unpublished.  According  to  information  given  me  by  Dr. 
Goodale,  these  chickens  had  been  inbred  only  for  five  or  six  generations  of 
consecutive  brother-sister  matings.  Likewise  in  our  more  recent  experiments 
with  guinea  pigs,  inbred  for  only  a  small  number  of  generations  of  brother- 
sister  matings,  we  did  not  yet  observe  a  definite  approximation  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  in  the  various  members  of  these  families.  We  may 
therefore  conclude  that  in  order  to  achieve  progress  towards  an  autogenous 
constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials,  a  larger  number  of  consecutive 
brother-sister  matings  is  required  than  those  which  had  been  made  in  the 
chickens  in  Williamstown.  Resuming  these  investigations  more  recently  with 
W.  J.  Siebert,  we  confirmed  the  finding  that  also  in  the  exchange  of  tissues  be- 
tween brothers  of  strains  of  chickens  inbred  to  a  limited  extent,  a  very  in- 
tensive lymphocytic  infiltration  and  destruction  of  the  transplants  take  place, 
and  that  syngenesio-,  homoio-,  and  interracial  transplantations  in  such  chick- 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  IN  BIRDS  61 

ens  all  behave  in  about  the  same  manner,  although  some  very  slight  differences 
may  exist.  Thus  while  in  homoio-  and  interracial  transplantations  the  intensive 
lymphocytic  infiltration  set  in  about  10  to  11  days  following  transplantation, 
in  syngenesiotransplantations  it  appeared  a  few  days  later,  namely,  after  13 
days.  Similarly,  follicle-like  accumulations  of  large  lymphoblast-like  cells, 
which  were  found  in  these  grafts  in  chickens  and  which  aided  the  smaller 
lymphocytes  in  the  destruction  of  the  strange  tissues,  were  seen  in  the  first 
two  types  of  transplantations  after  13  days,  and  in  syngenesiotransplantations 
only  after  16  days.  While  these  differences  in  the  time  of  the  appearance  of 
such  cells  are  very  small,  still  they  are  in  agreement  with  the  findings  of  H.  T. 
Blumenthal  in  regard  to  differences  in  the  time  when  the  lymphocytes  are  in- 
creased in  the  circulating  blood  after  subcutaneous  transplantation  of  various 
pieces  of  tissue.  It  might  be  expected  that  the  rapidity  with  which  these 
changes  in  the  lymphocytes  and  lymphoblast-like  cells  become  manifest  locally 
and  the  rapidity  with  which  the  increase  in  the  lymphocytes  takes  place  in  the 
blood,  should  be  greater  in  those  cases  where  the  individuality  differentials, 
diffusing  into  the  surrounding  tissue  or  into  the  blood  vessels,  showed  a 
greater  degree  of  strangeness  and  therefore  also  a  greater  toxicity. 

In  contrast  to  these  types  of  transplantations,  after  autogenous  trans- 
plantation of  skin  and  xiphoid  cartilage  with  the  surrounding  tendon-like 
tissue,  collections  of  lymphocytes  are  lacking  altogether  or  only  very  small 
clumps  of  these  cells,  arranged  around  the  vessels,  can  be  seen.  If  keratin 
from  the  transplanted  skin  has  been  separated  from  the  epidermis  by  the 
connective  tissue,  a  few  lymphocytes  quite  commonly  collect  around  such 
foreign  bodies.  Lymphocytes  are  either  absent  or  only  very  small  collections 
form  around  particles  of  fat  tissue  transplanted  with  the  cartilage  or  around 
some  foreign  bodies. 

A  very  interesting  occurrence  is  that  sometimes  around  and  in  these  autog- 
enous transplants  a  disequilibration  between  the  host  connective  tissue  or 
the  transplanted  tendon  connective  tissue  and  the  cartilage  takes  place.  Then 
connective  tissue  cells  move  toward  the  piece  of  cartilage  and  surround  it, 
giving  rise  to  a  capsule.  Often  they  penetrate  also  into  the  periphery  of  the 
graft  in  the  direction  of  the  fibrillar  structure  of  the  long  axis  of  the  cartilage 
cells.  In  some  cases,  turning  approximately  at  right  angles  to  the  long  axis 
of  the  cartilage  cells,  they  penetrate  slightly  into  the  interior  of  the  cartilage. 
Moreover,  these  connective  tissue  cells  possess  the  power  to  split  and  dissolve 
the  cartilage,  and  in  doing  so,  they  sometimes  become  larger.  Either  in  the 
cartilage  or  in  the  surrounding  dense  fibrous  tissue  some  cells,  coming  from 
the  connective  tissue,  may  change  into  epithelioid  and  giant  cells,  especially 
in  places  where  an  obstacle  interferes  with  their  progress.  Connective  tissue 
cells  also  accompany  certain  vessels  which  grow  into  the  cartilage.  But  on 
the  whole,  the  transplanted  cartilage,  as  well  as  autotransplanted  fat  tissue 
and  bone  marrow  with  myelocytes,  is  well  preserved. 

There  is  a  remarkable  correspondence  between  the  reactions  of  the  host 
connective  tissue  towards  autotransplanted  cartilage  and  towards  autogenous 
epidermis  transplants  when  the  latter  do  not  close  to  a  cyst-like  or  to  a  flat 


62  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

body.  The  keratin,  and  perhaps  also  remnants  of  feathers  or  other  foreign 
material,  can  in  these  cases  act  as  non-specific  stimulators  for  the  host  fibro- 
blasts, or  even  for  the  transplanted  fibroblasts,  and  this  process  can  some- 
times lead  to  the  destruction  of  the  transplants ;  but  in  these  instances,  we 
have  to  deal  with  non-specific  reactions  of  connective  tissue  cells  and  not  with 
specific  reactions  on  the  part  of  lymphocytes  induced  by  strange  individuality 
differentials.  The  great  difficulty  on  the  part  of  the  chicken  and  pigeon  skin 
in  forming  a  typical  closed  cyst,  probably  due  to  the  low  degree  of  growth 
intensity  of  the  avian  epidermal  cells,  is  an  obstacle  to  the  successful  sub- 
cutaneous transplantation  of  skin  in  this  class  of  animals.  But  we  must  sharp- 
ly distinguish  between  non-specific  extraneous  factors  and  specific  factors 
which  can  be  used  in  the  analysis  of  individuality  differentials.  In  the  former, 
we  have  to  deal  with  general  tissue  reactions,  and  these  present  important  data 
which  can  be  used  in  the  construction  of  a  physiology  of  tissues. 

Various  difficulties,  then,  are  encountered,  which  limit  a  successful  analysis 
of  the  individuality  differentials  in  birds.  They  include :  ( 1 )  the  difficulty  of 
obtaining  the  organs  and  tissues  most  suitable  for  transplantation  in  living 
animals;  (2)  the  presence  of  complicating,  non-specific  factors  which  may 
cover  up  the  reactions  characteristic  of  the  individuality  differentials,  as,  for 
instance,  the  connective-tissue  reactions  which  we  have  mentioned,  and  (3) 
the  preponderance  of  lymphocytes  in  the  circulation  of  birds,  with  which  is 
associated  an  excessively  strong  reaction  of  lymphocytes  against  even  very 
slight  differences  in  individuality  differentials;  the  great  intensity  of  this 
reaction  makes  the  discernment  of  smaller  differences  in  individuality  differ- 
entials difficult.  However,  the  experiments  which  we  have  discussed  do  prove 
the  presence  of  very  fine  differences  in  individuality  differentials  in  birds, 
inasmuch  as  they  have  shown  that  such  differences  exist  also  between  brothers 
in  inbred  strains  or  races  of  birds. 

However,  the  great  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction  in  this  class  of 
animals  makes  possible  the  clearer  recognition  of  the  mode  of  action  and  of 
the  effects  of  the  infiltration  of  a  tissue  with  large  masses  of  lymphocytes.  In 
the  experiments  with  chickens  it  could  be  seen  that  these  cells  are  able  to 
cause  the  disintegration  of  such  structures  as  tendon-like  fibrous  tissue,  car- 
tilage, and  even  bone,  resulting  either  in  their  complete  solution  or  at  least 
very  extensive  destruction,  and  leaving  behind  a  fine  network  of  remnants  of 
these  tissues.  In  mammalian  transplantations  it  has  not  been  possible  to  ob- 
serve such  marked  effects ;  this  is  due  presumably  to  the  usually  less  massive 
invasion  of  mammalian  tissues  by  lymphocytes,  even  in  cases  in  which  lympho- 
cytes form  lymph-gland-like  accumulations  in  the  tissues,  such  as  we  found 
especially  in  rat  and  guinea  pig.  It  appears  doubtful  whether  mammalian  and 
avian  lymphocytes  otherwise  differ  markedly  in  their  destructive  power  on 
tissue,  which  is  presumably  due  to  the  action  of  enzymes.  In  the  mouse,  for 
instance,  one  can  see  in  homoiogenous  transplantations  that  lymphocytes  as 
well  as  connective  tissue  cells  are  able  to  penetrate  into  hyaline  connective 
tissue  with  ameboid  processes ;  they  move,  in  the  latter,  in  the  direction  of  the 
fibers  and  lymphocytes  may  likewise  invade  pieces  of  cartilage  in  the  direction 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  IN  BIRDS  63 

of  the  preformed  fibrillations  of  this  tissue ;  but  under  such  unfavorable  con- 
ditions these  cells  may  later  perish. 

The  effect  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  autogenous,  syngenesious 
and  homoiogenous  transplants  on  the  lymphocytes  in  the  circulating  blood. 

Disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  transplant  and  host 
not  only  causes  local  reactions,  owing  to  the  diffusion  of  the  individuality 
differential  substances  into  the  area  directly  surrounding  the  transplant,  but 
according  to  the  findings  of  Blumenthal,  diffusion  takes  place  also  into  the 
blood  vessels,  and  probably  into  the  lymph  vessels,  from  which  points  these 
differentials  are  carried  presumably  to  the  blood-forming  organs  and  here 
stimulate  an  increased  production  or  elimination  of  the  white  blood  cells  into 
the  capillaries.  This  occurs  in  birds  as  well  as  in  mammals.  There  is,  more- 
over, a  quantitative  relation  between  the  kinds  of  individuality  differential 
substances  given  off  by  the  transplants  and  the  kind  and  intensity  of  changes 
induced.  It  may  furthermore  be  assumed  that  even  in  the  case  of  the  local 
reactions  around  the  transplants  these  substances  diffuse  into  the  blood  or 
lymph  stream  and  thereby  contribute  to  the  local  accumulation  of  the  white 
blood  cells ;  at  least  the  filling  of  the  lymph  vessels  with  lymphocytes  and  the 
increased  number  of  the  latter  in  the  blood  capillaries  around  homoiotrans- 
plants  suggest  such  a  process. 

Investigation  of  the  effect  of  homoiogenous  and  syngenesiotransplants  by 
Blumenthal  gave  the  following  results :  A  relative  and  absolute  increase  in  the 
number  of  lymphocytes  in  the  peripheral  blood  took  place  after  homoio-  and 
syngenesiotransplantation,  in  contrast  to  heterotransplantation,  after  which  an 
increase  in  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  occurred.  The  general  and  local  re- 
actions were  found  at  about  the  same  time.  After  homoiotransplantation  of 
the  thyroid  gland  the  maximum  in  the  increase  in  lymphocytes  in  the  blood 
was  on  about  the  6th  or  7th  day ;  this  was  also  the  time  when  the  lymphocytes 
began  to  collect  locally  around  the  graft;  on  the  other  hand,  the  maximum  in- 
crease in  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  after  heterotransplantation  oc- 
curred more  rapidly,  namely,  on  the  4th  or  5th  day.  The  time  when  the  maxi- 
mum in  the  response  was  attained  depended  also  upon  the  consistency  of  the 
different  tissues;  this  factor  seemed  to  determine  the  readiness  with  which 
these  specific  substances,  possessing  the  individuality  differentials,  were  ex- 
tracted and  were  able  to  diffuse  into  the  adjoining  areas  and  into  the  circulation 
of  the  host.  The  relative  increase  in  the  percentage  of  lymphocytes  after 
homoiotransplantation  of  thyroid  varied  from  13.5  per  cent  in  the  pigeon,  to 
16.9  per  cent  in  the  rat,  and  to  16.6  per  cent  in  the  guinea  pig,  and  in  a  number 
of  experiments  it  exceeded  25  per  cent.  After  heterotransplantation  the  rela- 
tive increase  in  the  percentage  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  ranged  be- 
tween about  12  per  cent  and  26  per  cent.  After  autogenous  transplantation  of 
different  organs  or  tissues,  the  average  maximum  percentage  increase  of  lym- 
phocytes showed  variations  between  3.3  and  6.5  per  cent  in  different  species  of 
animals ;  in  the  pigeon  there  was  no  increase.  After  subcutaneous  transplanta- 
tion of  inert  foreign  bodies  or  after  an  incision  the  effect  on  the  number  of  the 
circulating  lymphocytes  was  about  the  same  as  after  autogenous  transplanta- 


64  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tion.  The  conclusion  seems  therefore  justified  that  the  increase  after  trans- 
plantations in  which  host  and  donor  are  identical  is  a  non-specific  reaction. 

Syngenesiotransplantation  of  the  thyroid  in  guinea  pigs  caused  an  average 
maximum  percentage  increase  of  lymphocytes  amounting  to  11.7  and  the 
average  period  of  the  maximum  increase  was  12.1  days  after  transplantation, 
as  compared  with  the  corresponding  figures  in  case  of  homoiotransplantation 
of  the  guinea  pig  thyroid,  which  were  respectively  16.6  per  cent  and  7.1  days. 
The  increase  in  the  lymphocytes  after  syngenesiotransplantation  was  therefore 
less  than  after  homoiotransplantation  and  it  appears  later,  indicating  a  milder 
reaction  in  the  former,  a  fact  which  harmonizes  with  the  decreased  disharmony 
of  the  individuality  differentials  between  nearly  related  individuals  as  com- 
pared to  not  nearly  related,  homoiogenous  individuals. 

The  conclusion  that  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  donor  is  the  decisive  factor  in  the  changes  in  the  distribution  of  white 
blood  cells  following  various  types  of  transplantation  agrees  also  with  the 
results  obtained  in  mice.  After  transplantation  of  tissues  to  a  different  strain, 
the  average  lymphocytic  increase  was  17.7  per  cent,  and  after  transplantation 
within  the  strain  it  was  12.1  per  cent.  However,  after  transplantation  within 
strain  A,  the  most  closely  inbred  strain,  the  increase  in  the  lymphocytes  was 
only  10  per  cent  and  the  maximum  increase  appeared  somewhat  later,  on  the 
average,  after  13.6  days.  These  transplantations  correspond  therefore  to  the 
syngenesiotransplantations  in  the  guinea  pig.  The  response  of  strain  A  mice  to 
heterogenous  transplants  from  the  rat  was  similar  to  that  seen  in  other  types  of 
heterogenous  transplants ;  the  average  increase  in  polymorphonuclear  leuco- 
cytes was  18.7  per  cent ;  it  set  in  between  the  2nd  and  4th  day  and,  as  usual,  was 
followed  by  a  secondary  rise  in  lymphocytes.  There  was  not  only  a  relative  in- 
crease in  the  lymphocytes  or  leucocytes  in  the  various  types  of  transplantations, 
but  also  an  absolute  increase,  which  was  even  more  striking  than  the  relative 
increase.  In  the  guinea  pig  the  absolute  increase  in  the  number  of  lympho- 
cytes amounted  to  about  78  per  cent  and  in  the  rat  to  about  54  per  cent,  while 
the  average  increase  in  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  reached  about  110  per 
cent. 

This  method  of  analyzing  the  individuality  differentials  lent  itself  well  to  a 
comparison  between  the  individuality  differentials  in  adult  and  in  embryonal 
tissues.  It  was  found  that  tissues  obtained  from  fully  developed  embryos  near 
the  time  of  labor  behaved  after  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  transplanta- 
tion in  the  same  way  as  the  corresponding  adult  tissues.  On  the  other  hand, 
very  young  embryonic  tissues  removed  from  an  animal  at  about  the  conclusion 
of  the  first  third  of  pregnancy  behaved  differently ;  here,  after  heterogenous, 
as  well  as  after  homoiogenous  transplantation,  a  lymphocytic  response  similar 
to  that  noted  after  homoiogenous  transplantation  was  observed,  while  an  in- 
crease in  the  number  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  host  was  lacking 
under  these  conditions.  This  indicates  that  the  typical  heterogenous  organismal 
differentials  had  not  yet  developed  in  these  cases.  But  the  lymphocytic  reac- 
tion may  correspond  to  the  increase  in  lymphocytes  in  the  blood  noted  after 
transplantation  of  various  dead  protein  substances  into  the  subcutaneous 


TRANSPLANTATIONS  IN  BIRDS  65 

tissue ;  or  it  may  represent  a  rudimentary  heterogenous  reaction,  in  which  the 
as  yet  imperfectly  developed  organismal  differential  is  able  to  activate  the 
lymphocytes  but  is  not  yet  strong  enough  to  act  on  the  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes. 

In  general,  we  may  conclude  from  these  data  that  the  method  used  by  Blu- 
menthal  is  a  very  useful  one  if  we  wish  to  obtain  comparable  data  of  a 
quantitative  nature  and  that  in  this  respect  it  surpasses  the  use  of  the  local 
reactions.  But  the  latter  give  an  insight  into  the  effect  of  various  types  of  in- 
dividuality differentials  on  different  kinds  of  host  cells;  it  makes  possible, 
furthermore,  the  differentiation  between  the  effects  of  the  bodyfluids  and  of 
the  host  cells  on  the  transplant.  There  is,  in  addition,  the  possibility  that  the 
reactions  in  the  circulating  blood  are  complicated  by  non-specific  or  less  specific 
substances  which  may  be  present  in  the  transplanted  tissues.  Thus  Blumenthal 
found  that  also  the  introduction  of  certain  non-living  protein  substances  into 
the  subcutaneous  tissue  may  cause  an  increase  of  lymphocytes  in  the  blood, 
similar  to  that  noted  after  the  introduction  of  living  tissues.  However,  in  this 
case  heating  the  protein  substances  does  not  lead  to  a  loss  of  the  general 
lymphocytic  reaction  as  does  the  heating  of  the  tissues.  Moreover,  at  least  as 
far  as  we  know  at  present,  the  fine  shading  of  the  reactions  in  accordance  with 
the  relationship  between  host  and  transplant,  which  is  characteristic  of  the 
introduction  of  pieces  of  living  tissue,  is  lacking  in  the  case  of  the  protein 
material.  These  complications  are  apparently  absent  in  the  case  of  the  local 
reaction.  Considering  all  these  facts,  it  seems  that  the  combined  use  of  these 
two  methods  is  preferable  to  the  application  of  either  of  them  alone. 


Chapter  J 

The   Mechanism   of  the   Reactions  Against 

Homoiogenous  Individuality  Differentials; 

Autogenous  Tissue  Regulators 

1.  Various  phases  which  follow  auto  and  hotnoio  transplantation.  It  fol- 
lows from  the  observations  discussed  in  the  preceding  chapters,  that  after 
transplantation  there  is  a  first  phase  in  which  there  is  no  noticeable  difference 
between  the  conditions  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplants.  This 
phase  is  dominated  by  the  injury  due  to  the  process  of  transplantation  and 
by  injurious  conditions  existing  in  the  new  location  of  the  tissue.  The  damage 
to  the  tissues  is  followed  by  regenerative  reactions ;  the  homoiogenous  tissues 
are  subjected  subsequently,  during  the  second  phase,  to  further  specific 
injuries  by  the  host  and  these  may  also  call  forth  regenerative  processes  as 
long  as  the  injury  has  not  progressed  too  far.  These  injuries,  furthermore, 
initiate  the  activity  of  the  host  connective  tissue,  which  moves  towards  the 
transplants.  There  originate,  thus,  general,  partly  non-specific  changes,  which 
are  based  on  attributes  of  the  grafted  tissues  and  of  the  host  tissues. 

This  first  phase  is  followed  by  a  second  one,  in  which  differences  develop 
between  the  autogenous  and  the  homoiogenous  transplanted  tissues.  There  is 
a  preponderance  of  regenerative  growth  processes  and  regulative  processss 
in  the  autogenous  transplants,  and  there  are  injurious  effects  which  the  host 
exerts  on  the  graft  under  the  influence  of  homoiogenous  individuality  differ- 
entials. The  latter  tend  to  prevent  a  satisfactory  recovery  of  the  transplanted 
homoiogenous  tissue  from  the  injuries  received  during  the  first  phase,  and 
they  cause  additional  damage  to  the  homoiogenous  transplant,  which  thus,  in 
many  cases,  cannot  maintain  itself  and  during  the  third  phase  is  gradually 
destroyed.  These  are  the  characteristic  features  of  the  second  and  third  phases 
following  transplantation,  in  which  differences  between  the  conditions  of  the 
autogenous  and  homoiogenous  tissues  become  more  and  more  marked.  How- 
ever, there  occur,  also,  changes  opposed  to  this  outcome,  namely,  conditions 
of  adaptation  between  transplant  and  host,  which  in  certain  instances  may 
slowly  lead  to  an  improvement  in  the  state  of  the  homoiogenous  transplant  and 
may  make  possible  its  survival  in  the  strange  host. 

As  to  the  mechanisms  leading  to  the  secondary  injury  of  the  homoiogenous 
tissue,  they  consist,  in  the  first  place,  in  the  action  of  the  homoiotoxins  of  the 
host,  and  secondly,  in  the  activities  of  the  host  cells ;  the  most  specific  among 
the  latter  are  the  reactions  of  the  lymphocytes ;  but  also  the  behavior  of  the 
connective  tissue  and  blood  vessels  is  influenced  by  the  homoiogenous  charac- 
ter of  the  individuality  differentials.  Furthermore,  the  age  of  the  host  in- 
fluences the  action  of  the  connective  tissue ;  the  latter  is  diminished  if  the  host 
is  very  young.  It  seems  that  in  every  instance  the  homoiotoxins  act  on  tissues 

66 


REACTIONS  AGAINST  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  67 

possessing  strange  individuality  differentials  and  injure  them ;  but  they  do  so 
to  a  very  different  degree  in  different  cases.  The  effect  may  be  so  slight  that  it 
is  hardly  noticeable;  but  in  other  cases  the  direct  injurious  action  of  these 
substances  is  quite  marked  and  in  different  species  the  relative  preponderance 
of  the  influence  of  the  host  cells  and  of  the  bodyfluids  varies,  the  latter  being 
relatively  more  important  in  the  mouse  than  in  the  guinea  pig  and  rat.  The 
fact  that  an  interaction  between  transplanted  tissues  and  the  bodyfluids  of  the 
host  takes  place  in  every  instance  makes  it  difficult  to  decide  whether  the  host 
cells  are  activated  by  the  homoiogenous  individuality  differential  of  the  trans- 
plant directly,  or  only  after  the  latter  has  combined  with  the  homoiotoxins  of 
the  host. 

The  growth  processes,  and  in  particular  the  mitotic  cell  multiplication,  which 
occur  in  the  transplanted  tissues  are  not  entirely  regenerative  in  character, 
but  they  may  be  due  partly  to  the  continued  function  of  a  primary  tendency 
to  mitotic  proliferation,  which  is  inherent  to  a  very  different  degree  in  differ- 
ent tissues.  In  tissues  in  which  secondary  differentiations  have  taken  place,  as 
for  instance,  in  cartilage  and  striated  muscle  tissue,  or  in  epidermal  cells  at 
some  distance  from  the  source  of  oxygen  supply,  the  tendency  to  undergo 
mitotic  proliferation  is  replaced  by  amitotic  processes.  Certain  unfavorable 
environmental  factors  may  likewise  prevent  mitotic  proliferation  and  instead 
cause  formation  of  epithelioid  and  giant  cells,  and  in  general  favor  processes 
of  differentiation  instead  of  mitotic  proliferation. 

2.  The  mechanism  which  leads  to  the  specific  reactions  of  the  lymphocytes 
of  the  host  against  the  transplant.  We  have  seen  that  different  homoiogenous 
tissues  may  attract  the  lymphocytes  to  a  different  degree,  and  we  shall  report 
on  particularly  striking  instances  of  such  differences  between  different  organs 
in  subsequent  chapters  when  we  discuss  the  transplantation  of  adrenal  gland 
and  anterior  hypophysis  in  mice.  In  addition,  it  was  possible  to  demonstrate, 
in  the  rat,  the  attraction  which  homoiogenous  tissues  exert  on  the  lymphocytes 
of  a  nearby  lymph  gland  of  the  host,  in  experiments  which  Crossen  carried 
out  in  the  guinea  pig.  He  autotransplanted  a  lymph  gland  into  the  subcutaneous 
tissue  and  then  placed  either  a  piece  of  autogenous  or  homoiogenous  xiphoid 
cartilage  near  the  lymph  gland,  or  into  the  lymph  gland  itself.  While  the 
lymphocytes  of  the  transplanted  lymph  gland  were  inactive  towards  the  auto- 
genous cartilage  graft,  they  were  actively  attracted  by  the  homoiogenous  tissue 
and  they  migrated  into  the  homoiogenous  transplant.  This  may  be  considered 
as  confirmatory  evidence  for  the  conclusion  that  the  movement  of  the  lympho- 
cytes towards  the  homoiogenous  transplants  represents  a  chemotropic  reac- 
tion. 

3.  Differences  in  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  against  strange  individuality 
differentials  observed  in  different  families  or  strains  of  rats.  If  tissues  are 
homoiotransplanted  from  certain  families  or  strains  of  rats  into  other  families 
or  strains,  different  average  degrees  of  severity  in  the  reactions  may  be  ob- 
served. We  have  analyzed  the  factors  which  cause  these  differences  in  several 
series  of  experiments  carried  out  in  rats.  For  this  purpose  we  compared  the 
reactions  in  rats  from  various  strains  and  families,  obtained  from  different 


68  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

breeders  in  different  cities.  Various  combinations  of  donors  and  hosts  were 
tested,  and  in  a  number  of  experiments  tissues  from  one  donor  were  placed 
into  the  left  side,  and  those  from  another  donor  into  the  right  side  of  a  host; 
in  other  cases,  pieces  of  tissues  from  the  same  donor  were  transplanted  into 
two  different  hosts.  In  the  majority  of  these  experiments  the  examinations 
took  place  20  days  after  transplantation. 

In  order  to  compare  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  in  different  combinations 
of  hosts  and  transplants  it  is  necessary  to  make  equal  the  times  at  which  the 
examination  takes  place.  With  increasing  time,  the  severity  of  the  reactions  as 
a  rule  increases.  If  we  consider  all  these  experiments  together,  we  may  con- 
clude that  autotransplantation,  where  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
transplants  are  identical,  reactions  which  do  occur  are  due  to  injury  inflicted 
on  the  grafted  tissue  during  the  operation  or  to  the  abnormal  conditions  under 
which  the  transplants  live  in  their  new  environment,  and  that  these  abnormal 
conditions  are,  as  a  rule,  overcome  in  the  course  of  time.  On  the  other  hand,  in 
the  case  of  homoiotransplantations  the  reactions  are  caused  by  the  differences 
in  the  individuality  differentials  between  host  and  transplants,  and  in  different 
combinations  of  families  or  strains  the  severity  of  the  reaction  in  the  host  and 
the  injury  in  the  donor  differ.  While  in  some  combinations  the  reactions  are 
severe,  as  indicated  by  grade  1,  in  others  the  grades  range  between  1  and  2—  ; 
in  still  others  the  average  grade  may  be  2—,  or  even  somewhat  higher,  and  in 
rare  instances,  grade  3  —  ,  or  even  3,  may  be  reached  in  an  animal.  These  grades 
apply  only  for  a  certain  length  of  time,  during  which  the  transplant  was  ex- 
posed to  the  influence  of  the  host ;  this  period  was  20  days  in  this  series  of 
experiments  and  there  are  indications  that  after  30  or  40  days  the  reactions 
would  have  been  more  severe  and  the  grades  accordingly  lower.  Essentially 
two  factors  are  responsible  for  the  grades  thus  obtained.  In  the  first  place, 
these  differences  in  the  reactions  are  due  to  differences  in  the  relationship  be- 
tween the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor.  This  is  indicated  by  the 
fact  that  if  various  tissues  are  transplanted  from  one  donor  into  the  same 
host,  the  severity  of  the  reaction  is  the  same  in  all  the  pieces,  if  we  make 
allowance  for  the  peculiarities  which  distinguish  different  types  of  tissues. 
This  conclusion  harmonizes  with  the  many  other  transplantations  which  we 
have  carried  out  with  homoiogenous  tissues.  Thus,  in  a  certain  experiment  in 
which  grade  3  had  been  given,  a  great  portion  of  the  thyroid  transplant  was 
preserved ;  in  the  muscle  transplant  there  were  long  parallel  muscle  fibers  with 
good  cross-striations,  and  in  one  specimen  of  this  kind  even  a  mitosis  seemed 
to  be  present  in  a  muscle  cell.  Likewise,  the  grafted  fat  tissue  was  well  pre- 
served. With  grade  2  there  was  much  lymphocytic  infiltration  in  thyroid  and 
muscle  and  at  least  a  large  part  of  the  fat  tissue  was  preserved,  while  with 
grade  1,  neither  thyroid  nor  muscle  was  preserved  and  the  fat  tissue  was 
mostly  replaced  by  connective  tissue,  small  vacuolated  cells  and  lymphocytes. 
Furthermore,  it  could  be  seen  that  the  individuality  differentials  of  both  host 
and  donor  determined  the  intensity  of  the  reactions;  this  follows  from  ex- 
periments in  which  either  the  donor  or  the  host  varied,  while  the  other  partner 
which  entered  into  the  combination  remained  constant.  The  lymphocytic  reac- 


REACTIONS  AGAINST  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  69 

tions  likewise,  as  a  rule,  were  constant  in  pieces  of  tissue  from  the  same 
donor,  transplanted  into  the  same  host,  provided  we  consider  that  there  are 
various  variable  factors  which  complicate  such  experiments  and,  in  particular, 
that  as  a  rule  only  in  transplants  in  which  there  is  a  large  amount  of  living 
tissue  left  is  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  considerable. 

However,  there  were  strong  indications  that,  in  addition,  another  factor 
played  a  role  in  certain  instances.  Thus  we  observed  that  in  the  same  host  the 
reactions  against  various  tissues  from  two  different  homoiogenous  donors, 
while  not  necessarily  identical,  were  correlated  with  each  other.  Furthermore, 
if  tissues  from  two  donors  were  each  transplanted  into  two  different  hosts, 
the  reactions  against  both  could  be  severe  in  one  host  and  relatively  mild  in 
the  other  host.  It  was  especially  the  Bu  rats  which,  in  almost  all  cases,  reacted 
very  severely  against  transplants  from  other  families  or  strains  of  rats,  the 
grade  being  1  in  the  large  majority  of  cases,  while  the  reciprocal  transplan- 
tations, in  which  Bu  rats  were  the  donors  and  other  families  the  hosts,  gave  a 
much  greater  number  of  milder  reactions.  The  Bu  rats,  before  being  used  for 
transplantation,  had  been  fed  for  some  time  on  a  riboflavin-deficient  diet ;  but 
that  this  was  not  the  essential  cause  of  the  strong  reaction  against  strange 
individuality  differentials  which  these  rats  exhibited  was  shown  in  control 
experiments,  in  which  this  same  strain  of  rats  had  always  been  kept  on  a 
normal  diet,  but  the  severity  of  the  reaction  was  not  diminished ;  nor  was  the 
age  (weight)  of  the  animals  used,  nor  the  season  of  the  year  when  the  experi- 
ments were  carried  out  of  significance  in  this  respect.  Only  in  a  single  experi- 
ment in  which  these  rats  served  as  hosts  were  the  reactions  somewhat  milder. 
While  thus  the  Bu  rats  reacted  in  almost  all  instances  very  strongly  against 
homoiogenous  differentials,  the  homoiogenous  differentials  of  Wistar  rats, 
serving  as  donors,  seemed  to  elicit  less  strong  reactions  on  the  part  of  the  host 
than  did  some  of  the  other  strains,  although  they  still  remained  within  the 
homoiogenous  range.  There  is,  then,  some  strong  experimental  evidence  for 
the  conclusion  that  certain  strains  of  rats,  and  probably  also  other  species, 
have  the  peculiarity  of  reacting  especially  strongly  against  strange  individuality 
differentials,  and  it  is  furthermore  possible  that  the  grafted  tissues  from  cer- 
tain strains  of  rats,  acting  as  donors,  stimulate  the  host  cells  less  actively  than 
do  the  tissues  from  other  strains.  A  second  set  of  factors  exists  therefore 
besides  the  degree  of  strangeness  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant,  which  determines  the  severity  of  the  reaction  of  the  host 
against  the  transplant,  namely,  a  peculiar  reactivity  of  the  host  tissues  which 
presumably  has  also  a  genetic  basis.  There  is,  besides,  some  evidence  that  not 
only  strains  of  animals  have  this  peculiarity  in  their  mode  of  reaction,  but  that 
also  various  individuals  may  differ  from  one  another  in  this  respect. 

4.  The  effect  of  heat  on  the  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials  in 
rats.  In  these  experiments  we  subjected  thyroid  and  cartilage- fat  tissue  of 
Bu  rats  to  boiling  temperatures  for  5  minutes  and  then  transplanted  the  pieces 
into  Chicago  rats.  Under  these  conditions  the  homoiotransplanted  tissues 
were  entirely  necrotic.  After  12  days,  the  nuclei  in  the  thyroid  and  parathyroid 
were  found  dissolved  in  the  peripheral,  and  shrunken  in  the  central  acini. 


70  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Fibrous  tissue  grew  around  and  into  the  transplant.  Also,  cartilage  and  fat 
tissue  were  necrotic,  but  the  peripheral  portions  of  these  pieces  had  been 
fixed  as  a  result  of  the  boiling.  Connective  tissue  and  small  vacuolated  cells 
grew  into  the  fat  tissue,  but  the  lymphocytic  reaction  was  lacking.  After  20 
days,  the  results  were  similar.  In  the  thyroid,  some  balls  of  hard  colloid,  sur- 
rounded by  some  giant  cells  and  fibrous  tissue,  were  seen.  At  this  time  also, 
connective  tissue  grew  into  thyroid  and  into  necrotic  fat  tissue,  in  which,  in 
addition,  small  vacuolated  and  epithelioid  cells  were  seen.  A  few  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  were  likewise  noted  in  the  connective  tissue,  but  a  typical 
lymphocytic  reaction  was  absent,  and  the  homoiogenous  fat  tissue  did  not 
attract  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes.  These  experiments  confirm,  then,  the 
conclusion  that  in  general,  if  we  except  reactions  of  a  non-specific  nature,  such 
as  the  ones  elicited  by  certain  dead  foreign  bodies,  only  living  tissue  calls  forth 
the  lymphocytic  reaction  which  is  characteristic  of  transplants  possessing 
homoiogenous  individuality  differentials. 

5.  The  autogenous  tissue  regulators.  In  the  normal  organism  the  various 
types  of  cells  have  inherited  those  modes  of  interaction  with  other  cells  and 
intercellular  substances  of  different  kinds,  by  means  of  which  the  mutual  cell 
and  tissue  relations  are  safeguarded.  Hence,  whenever  the  various  types  of 
transplanted  tissues  possess  the  same  autogenous  chemical  characteristics  of 
the  individuality  differential  as  the  host,  they  tend  to  interact  with  the  host 
tissues  as  if  they  were  a  normal  constituent  of  the  host,  even  if  at  first  a  dis- 
organization has  taken  place  as  the  result  of  temporary  accidental  conditions. 
The  disappearance  at  later  dates  of  factors  disturbing  the  normal  tissue  rela- 
tions directly  following  autogenous  transplantation  of  thyroid,  cartilage,  fat 
tissue  and  uterus,  indicates  the  presence  of  autogenous  regulators.  However, 
not  in  all  organs  do  such  regulators  suffice  to  overcome  the  abnormalities 
brought  about  by  the  operation ;  for  instance,  in  the  transplants  of  kidney  a 
complete  normality  in  the  structure  of  the  transplant  does  not  need  to  be 
achieved.  A  perfectly  closed  epithelial  layer  may  survive  permanently  after 
autotransplantation,  but  incompletely  closed  epithelial  structures,  such  as 
kidney  tubules  which  have  been  cut  at  one  end,  and  especially  the  more  differ- 
entiated convoluted  tubules  or  epidermal  cysts  which  are  interrupted  by  hairs, 
are  at  a  disadvantage  and  may  die  even  after  autogenous  transplantation. 

After  homoiogenous  transplantation  of  various  tissues  and  organs  in  a 
number  of  species,  the  interaction  of  disharmonious  individuality  differentials 
leads  to  abnormal  relations  between  host  cells  and  transplanted  tissue.  The 
homoiogenous  substances  given  off  by  the  transplants  stimulate  and  attract 
lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue  cells,  with  graded  intensities  which  exceed 
the  threshold  of  normality,  and  in  addition,  homoiogenous  substances  of  the 
host  may  injure  directly  the  homoiogenous  tissues,  whose  relation  to  stroma 
cells  and  blood  vessels  and  to  lymphocytes  in  the  adjoining  areas  of  the  host  is 
thus  altered.  In  the  end,  in  the  large  majority  of  cases  the  transplanted  tissue 
is  either  destroyed  or  at  least  its  normal  structure  and  relations  to  the  neigh- 
boring tissues  are  not  completely  re-established. 

Regeneration  may  also  be  considered  as  a  regulatory  process  in  the  relations 


REACTIONS  AGAINST  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  71 

between  tissues  and  it  is  based  essentially  on  inherited  properties  of  the  tissues. 
These  inherited  characteristics  assert  themselves  in  all  instances,  irrespective 
of  the  autogenous  or  homoiogenous  state  of  the  transplants.  In  certain  tissues, 
which  possess  great  resistance  to  injurious  conditions  and  in  which  the  re- 
generative momentum  is  very  strong,  regenerative  processes  may  take  place 
in  a  homoiogenous  medium,  but  the  homoiogenous  relationship  always  tends 
to  act  as  an  injurious  factor,  preventing  or  at  least  inhibiting  regenerative 
activities. 

There  enter,  then,  at  least  two  factors  in  the  creation  and  maintenance  of  the 
autogenous  tissue  equilibrium,  namely  (1)  the  individuality  differentials, 
which  diffuse  from  the  tissues  into  the  surrounding  bodyfluids  and  which 
are  present  also  in  the  blood;  (2)  other  factors  inherent  in  the  tissues,  which 
assert  themselves  under  certain  conditions,  as,  for  instance  during  regenera- 
tion. There  exists  the  probability  that  the  autogenous  individuality  differentials 
as  such  function  as  these  tissue  equilibrizing  substances ;  but  it  is  also  con- 
ceivable that  there  may  exist  special  autogenous  tissue-regulating  substances, 
which  possess  a  chemical  group  characteristic  of  the  individuality  differential 
of  the  host,  or  that  there  may  be  separate  autogenous  substances  devoid  of 
the  individuality  differential  but  which  could  induce  the  tissues  to  react  in  the 
normal  manner  only  in  an  autogenous  medium.  However,  the  first  interpreta- 
tion seems  to  be  the  simpler  and  more  ^probable  one.  Just  as  the  homoio- 
genous individuality  differential  exerts  abnormal  effects  on  various  types  of 
cells,  so  the  autogenous  individuality  differential  may  be  expected  to  exert 
the  opposite  functions,  which  in  contrast  to  the  homoiogenous  substances 
bring  about  and  maintain  a  normal  relation  between  the  various  tissues.  These 
substances,  acting  on  adjoining  tissues  as  contact  substances  which  latter  in  a 
wider  sense  may  be  included  among  the  hormones,  although  not  usually  thus 
classified,  and  acting  also  on  distant  tissues  as  hormones  in  the  usual  mean- 
ing of  this  term,  would  thus  possess  a  very  important  function  in  making 
possible  the  harmonious  interaction  of  the  many  constituent  parts  of  the  in- 
dividual organism;  however,  they  would  be  supported  in  this  task  by  other 
typical  hormones  produced  in  distant  organs,  which  do  not  necessarily  possess 
the  individuality  differential,  and  also  by  specific  elements  of  the  nervous 
system. 


Chapter  6 

Syngenesiotransplantation,  Transplantation  in 

Closely  Inbred  Strains,  and  the  Individuality 

Differentials  of  Near  Relatives 

The  average  genetic  relationship  between  near  relatives,  such  as  broth- 
ers and  sisters,  parents  and  children,  should  be  somewhere  intermedi- 
ate between  the  homoiogenous  and  autogenous  relationship,  and,  ac- 
cordingly, the  average  results  of  syngenesiotransplantation  should  likewise  be 
somewhere  intermediate  between  those  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous 
transplantation.  That  this  is  the  case  is  indicated  by  some  experiments  to 
which  we  have  already  referred.  However,  there  may  be  instances  in  which 
such  intermediate  results  are  not  evident,  but  in  which  the  reactions  obtained 
in  syngenesiotransplantation  cannot  be  distinguished  sharply  from  those  ob- 
tained in  homoiogenous  transplantation.  Several  conditions  might  account  for 
this  occurrence:  (1)  It  might  be  due  to  the  fact  that  even  in  syngenesio- 
relationship  there  may  be  such  a  degree  of  genetic  difference  between  donor 
and  host  of  the  transplant  that  the  threshold  determining  a  reaction  charac- 
teristic of  a  homoiogenous  transplantation  has  been  reached,  although  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  of  donor  and  host  actually  are  more  nearly  related 
than  is  the  case  in  the  average  of  homoiogenous  individuals.  (2)  It  might 
also  be  due  to  the  fact  that  when  the  threshold  determining  the  homoiogenous 
reaction  is  very  close  to  the  autogenous  region  in  the  spectrum  of  reactions, 
the  host  cells  are  extremely  active  and  efficient  in  discovering  differences  in 
genetic  relationship  and  therefore  the  transplants,  whose  individuality  differ- 
entials deviated  only  slightly  from  those  of  the  host,  are  attacked  with  a 
maximum  intensity,  a  type  of  reaction  which  we  have  found  to  obtain  in 
birds.  In  those  instances  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
donor  in  ordinary  syngenesiotransplantation  are  so  far  removed  from  each 
other  that  a  mitigated  reaction  can  not  be  demonstrated,  an  experimental  in- 
tensification of  the  brother-sister  relationship,  through  inbreeding,  may  make 
the  genetic  relationship  closer  than  it  is  in  ordinary  brother-sister  relationship. 
In  this  event  the  threshold  point  separating  homoiogenous  and  syngenesious 
reactions  may  not  yet  have  been  passed  and  the  difference  in  the  reaction  of 
the  host  against  the  tissues  from  a  brother  and  from  a  not  so  nearly  related 
individual  belonging  to  the  same  inbred  family  or  strain  may  then  become 
manifest.  In  all  essential  respects,  transplantations  in  closely  inbred  strains 
represent  intensified  brother-and-sister  relationships,  because  the  closely 
inbred  strains  were  obtained  by  brother-sister  matings  in  consecutive  gen- 
erations. Theoretically,  it  would  be  expected  that  after  a  certain  number 
of  consecutive  brother-sister  matings  have  been  made,  the  relationships  even 
between  individuals  in  the  inbred  strain  other  than  brothers  and  sisters, 

72 


SYNGENESIOTRANSPLANTATION 


73 


should  pass  from  the  zone  of  syngenesio-relationship  and  reactions  to  the 
autogenous  zone;  but  in  reality  this  does  not  seem  to  be  fully  accomplished. 
A  closely  inbred  strain  is  a  strain  of  brothers  and  sisters,  which  are  very 
similar  in  genetic  constitution. 

After  these  introductory  remarks,  we  shall  consider  the  results  of  syn- 
genesiotransplantation  in  the  rat  and  in  the  guinea  pig,  and  then  we  shall 
analyze  the  interaction  of  the  individuality  differentials  observed  in  trans- 
plantations in  closely  inbred  strains  of  rats,  guinea  pigs  and  mice. 

(a)  Syngenesiotrans plantation  in  rats.  We  have  referred  already  to  some 
experiments  in  which  the  reactions  against  transplants  from  brothers  or  sisters 
were,  on  the  average,  milder  than  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous  trans- 
plants, but  on  the  other  hand  there  were  some  instances  in  which  no  sharp 
distinctions  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  brothers  and  sisters  and 
those  of  not  closely  related  individuals  could  be  established.  Thus  in  the  mutant 
Wistar  rats,  a  special  strain  developed  by  Dr.  Helen  Dean  King,  the 
syngenesio-reactions  were  milder  than  the  reactions  against  transplants  from 
non-related  rats  of  the  same  strain,  if  the  examination  of  the  grafts  occurred 
12  and  16  days  after  transplantation,  but  no  difference  was  found  after  20 
days.  Also  in  some  other  experiments  the  grades  in  syngenesiotransplantations 
could  approach  closely  the  average  grades  in  homoiotransplantations,  although 
their  average  reaction  was  still  somewhat  milder. 

Two  series  of  experiments  will  now  be  discussed — one  made  in  1918  (series 
I),  and  the  second  made  in  1927  (series  II),  in  which  we  compared  the  fate 
of  various  organs  such  as  skin,  ovary,  uterus,  spleen,  liver  and  thyroid  after 
various  types  of  syngenesiotransplantation  and  of  homoiotransplantation. 
More  than  one  organ,  as  a  rule,  was  transplanted  into  each  host.  The  average 
grades  obtained  in  these  series  are  given  in  the  following  table  I. 


TABLE  I 


Series  I 

Series  II 

Autogenous  transplantation 

3.15 

Homoiogenous  transplantation 

1.24 

Variations  between 
1  and  1 .  75 

Brother  or  sister  to  brother  or  sister 

2.08 

2.50 

Parents  to  children 

2.28 

2.06 

Children  to  parents 

2.11 

2.25 

Grandparents  to  grandchildren 

2 

Grandchildren  to  grandparents 

2.60 

In  the  second  series  it  was  thought  unnecessary  to  carry  out  autogenous 
transplantations,  because  these  did  not  vary  significantly  in  different  experi- 
ments. In  both  series  the  grades  were  better  in  the  various  kinds  of  syngenesio- 
transplantations than  in  homoiogenous  transplantations,  and  intermediate  be- 
tween those  obtained  in  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantations.  As  to 
various  types  of  syngenesiotransplantations,  no  consistent  differences  were 
found  and  those  that  were  noted  were  not  of  the  same  kind  in  the  first  and 
second  series. 


74  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

In  earlier  investigations,  Schoene  compared  various  types  of  transplanta- 
tions of  skin  into  defects  in  the  skin ;  he  used  as  criterion  of  the  results  the 
healing'  in  or  the  casting  off  of  the  transplants,  which  represents  an  all  or 
nothing  effect  and  does  not  allow  the  recognition  of  intermediate  degrees  of 
reactions.  In  young  rats,  autotransplantations  of  skin  succeeded  almost  invari- 
ably, while  in  older  rats  the  pieces  were  entirely  or  partly  cast  off.  In  trans- 
plantations between  relatives,  the  most  favorable  results  were  obtained  be- 
tween brothers  and  sisters,  provided  the  animals  were  young;  but  only  in  a 
small  minority  of  cases  did  the  grafts  in  relatives  behave  like  autotransplants ; 
in  the  large  majority,  they  were  cast  off  like  homoiotransplants.  However, 
altogether  only  eighteen  transplantations  between  relatives  were  carried  out,  a 
number  which,  considering  the  method  used  and  the  results  obtained,  was 
hardly  sufficient  to  differentiate  between  different  types  of  transplantations. 

If  instead  of  considering  merely  the  averages,  also  the  intensity  of  the  reac- 
tions in  the  individual  experiments  are  taken  into  account,  it  is  found  that  in 
the  spectrum  of  relationships  the  grades  of  the  syngenesiotransplants  range 
between  those  characteristic  of  homoiogenous  transplants  and  those  approach- 
ing almost  the  grades  characteristic  of  autogenous  transplants,  all  transitions 
in  grades  being  found.  These  results  indicate  the  presence  of  multiple  factors 
as  the  genetic  determiners  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  the  different 
animals.  We  have  not  to  deal  with  the  simple  proportions  of  alternating 
Mendelian  inheritance,  such  as  we  find  if  one  or  two  factors  are  the  hereditary 
determiners.  The  results  are  similar  to  those  noted  in  the  hereditary  trans- 
mission of  quantitative  differences  in  the  two  parents,  each  quantity  being 
represented  by  multiple  factors  and  one-half  of  the  multiple  factors  of  each 
parent  being  united  in  the  child ;  this  condition  would  lead  to  a  series  of  inter- 
mediate results  in  different  matings  and  to  the  appearance  of  a  blending  in- 
heritance. The  combination  of  the  multiple  factors  of  the  parents  leads  in  the 
offspring  to  the  production  of  a  chemical  substance,  the  individuality  differ- 
ential, which  is  present  in  all,  or  almost  all,  the  tissues  and  organs  of  the  child. 
The  assumption  of  the  presence  of  multiple  factors  as  determiners  of  the 
individuality  differential  is  also  in  accordance  with  the  gradations  in  the  in- 
tensity of  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous  tissues  which  were  found  in  the 
numerous  experiments  carried  out. 

The  effect  of  variations  in  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor 
on  transplanted  organs  and  their  constituent  parts  in  the  rat.  We  may  here 
digress  from  the  consideration  of  syngenesiotransplantations  and  discuss  the 
manner  in  which  different  organs  and  tissues  can  be  used  in  the  analysis  of  the 
character  of  the  individuality  differentials  and  of  the  organismal  differentials. 
Not  only  the  reaction  of  the  lymphocytes  and  of  the  connective  tissue  against 
the  transplant,  but  also  the  survival  and  preservation  of  the  constituent  parts 
of  the  transplanted  organs  may  be  used  in  the  standardization  of  the  individual- 
ity differentials,  provided  their  comparative  power  of  resistance  is  taken  into 
account,  and,  conversely,  the  various  degrees  of  injury  inflicted  on  these  con- 
stituent parts  of  organs  may  serve  as  a  test  of  their  sensitiveness.  Conditions 
prevailing  in  syngenesio-,  homoio-  and  heterotransplantations  cause  different 


SYNGENESIOTRANSPLANTATION  75 

intensities  of  damage  in  different  tissues,  and  they  affect  these  tissues,  there- 
fore, in  a  graded  manner.  In  general,  only  structures  with  an  intermediate 
degree  of  sensitiveness  are  suitable  indicators  in  the  analysis  of  the  individual- 
ity differentials.  Tissues,  such  as  cartilage,  which  are  so  little  sensitive  that 
they  react  in  about  the  same  way  after  autogenous,  syngenesious  and  homoiog- 
enous  transplantation,  are  not  suitable  for  this  purpose.  Likewise,  tissues 
which  are  so  sensitive  that  they  are  entirely  or  largely  destroyed  by  the  non- 
specific injury  connected  with  and  following  the  process  of  transplantation, 
such  as  adult  testicle  and  brain  of  adult  mammals,  are  not  suitable  test  objects. 
It  is  the  simple  constituents  of  various  organs,  those  less  differentiated  as  to 
structure  and  function,  which  are  usually  more  resistant  and  tend  to  survive 
even  if  the  conditions  following  transplantation  are  injurious.  Unfavorable 
conditions  of  nourishment,  such  as  deficiency  in  oxygen,  may  cause  the  differ- 
entiation of  tissues — for  instance,  in  the  epidermis,  in  placentoma,  in  the  large 
follicles  of  the  ovary — and  differentiation  may  result  in  both  increased  sensi- 
tiveness and  a  diminution  or  absence  of  proliferation,  or  in  a  proliferation  of 
an  abnormal  kind,  in  which  mitoses  are  lacking  and,  instead,  amitotic  nuclear 
multiplications  occur;  a  production  of  epithelioid  and  giant  cells,  and 
hypertrophy  rather  than  hyperplasia,  are  then  characteristic  findings  in 
this  condition.  The  most  sensitive  structures  perish  often  after  homoiotrans- 
plantation  but  may  remain  alive  after  syngenesiotransplantation.  We  may  now 
briefly  compare  the  relative  sensitiveness  of  the  various  organ  constituents 
which  we  have  used  for  transplantation  in  the  rat  and  classify  them  approxi- 
mately in  accordance  with  the  effect  which  the  different  types  of  individuality 
differentials  have  on  these  constituents. 

(1)  Skin:  In  homoiogenous  and  syngenesious  transplantation  into  the  sub- 
cutaneous tissue  the  skin,  which  here  forms  a  cyst,  is  usually  destroyed,  not- 
withstanding the  fact  that  the  epidermis  as  such  is  resistant.  This  destruction 
takes  place  because  in  the  skin,  after  transplantation,  the  injurious  action  of 
the  connective  tissue  elements  is  stimulated  and  strenghened  in  a  non-specific 
manner.  It  is  especially  the  loss  of  the  epithelial  lining  of  the  hair  follicles 
which  may  lead  to  the  stereotropic  ingrowth  of  the  connective  tissue  and  the 
destruction  of  the  cyst,  even  in  autotransplantation.  Furthermore,  under  un- 
favorable conditions  the  whole  epidermis  of  the  cyst  may  become  keratinized, 
owing  to  insufficient  nourishment  or  to  mechanical  pressure  by  hyaline  con- 
nective tissue,  which  may  at  times  fill  the  cyst.  Giant  cells  form  around  the 
hair  and  the  keratin  particles.  This  non-specific  action  of  the  connective  tissue, 
and  sometimes  also  of  the  lymphocytes,  in  co-operation  with  the  homoio-, 
or  syngenesio-toxins  of  the  host,  usually  leads  to  the  destruction  of  the  epi- 
dermis after  subcutaneous  transplantation,  owing  to  a  summation  of  these 
partly  non-specific  and  partly  specific  effects.  In  some  instances,  however,  the 
action  of  the  non-specific  factors  alone  may  lead  to  the  destruction  even  of 
the  autogenous  skin,  although  in  other  cases  this  may  remain  alive  for  a  long 
time  or  perhaps  permanently.  Mitoses  are  usually  found  in  the  hair  follicles, 
which  are  more  protected  than  other  structures. 

(2)  Ovary:  The  various  constituents  of  the  ovary  show  a  graded  power  of 


76  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

resistance,  which  diminishes  in  the  following  order:  (1)  Interstitial  gland, 
germinal  epithelium  and  medullary  ducts,  both  of  which  have  a  tendency  to 
form  cysts;  (2)  primordial  and  small  follicles;  (3)  medium-sized  and  large 
follicles;  (4)  corpora  lutea.  For  instance,  six  days  after  transplantation 
interstitial  gland  may  be  seen ;  it  is  derived  from  theca  interna  cells  of  atretic 
follicles,  and  perhaps  also  surviving  parts  of  the  granulosa  may  participate 
in  its  origin;  these  interstitial  gland  cells  may  give  rise  to  larger  cells,  con- 
taining yellow  pigment,  which  constitute  or  resemble  interstitial  gland  cells 
and  may  act  as  phagocytes,  taking  up  red  blood  cells  in  hemorrhagic  areas 
and  thus  producing  pigment.  Under  somewhat  more  favorable  conditions  of 
transplantation,  primordial  and  small  follicles  may  survive;  and  under  still 
more  favorable  circumstances  these  small  follicles  may  grow  to  medium-sized 
or  large  follicles.  Under  very  favorable  conditions  of  syngenesiotransplanta- 
tion,  the  large  follicles  may  rupture  and  give  rise  to  corpora  lutea;  but  the 
corpora  lutea,  consisting  of  differentiated  cells,  are  sensitive  and  usually 
degeneration  takes  place  if  they  are  transplanted.  In  other  instances  the  large 
follicles  do  not  rupture  but,  instead,  develop  into  large  cysts.  Ovulation  in 
the  transplanted  ovary  may  occur  synchronously  with  ovulation  in  the  non- 
transplanted  ovary  of  the  host,  perhaps  in  response  to  a  hormone  given  off 
by  the  anterior  hypophysis.  In  less  than  one-half  of  our  transplants  preserved, 
medium-sized  or  large  follicles  were  found;  this  is  a  frequency  which  is 
somewhat  less  than  that  with  which  bile  ducts  were  preserved  in  transplanted 
pieces  cf  liver.  If  thyroid  was  transplanted  simultaneously  with  the  ovary,  and 
if  the  reaction  against  the  homoiogenous  thyroid  was  severe,  only  the  more 
resistant  constituents  of  the  ovary  were  preserved.  On  the  other  hand,  in  cases 
of  a  syngenesio- reaction,  with  grade  3  or  3  —  ,  in  which  therefore  the  individu- 
ality differentials  of  host  and  transplant  were  relatively  harmonious,  primor- 
dial and  growing  Graafian  follicles  as  well  as  corpora  lutea  could  be  ob- 
served. However,  lymphocytes  infiltrated  even  better  preserved  ovarian  trans- 
plants; they  could  appear  first  around  vessels  and  then  infiltrate  also  other 
structures,  but  only  in  rather  rare  instances  did  they  infiltrate  preserved 
follicles.  Not  only  follicles,  but  even  medullary  ducts  were  found  more  fre- 
quently in  syngenesio-  than  in  homoiotransplantations.  Around  follicles,  which 
after  transplantation,  underwent  necrosis,  giant  cells  could  develop,  which 
functioned  as  phagocytes  and  helped  in  the  removal  of  the  necrotic  material. 
The  removal  of  necrotic  material  proceeded  very  slowly  and  remained  imper- 
fect for  a  long  time.  On  the  whole  there  was,  then,  a  great  difference  in  the 
power  of  resistance  of  the  various  ovarian  structures  and  there  was  a  definite 
correlation  between  the  types  of  transplantation  and  the  kind  of  ovarian  con- 
stituents which  survived  after  transplantation ;  in  general,  the  more  resistant 
ovarian  structures  were  less  prone,  whereas  the  most  sensitive  constituents  of 
the  ovary  were  more  prone  to  injury  than  the  acini  in  the  thyroid  gland  trans- 
planted simultaneously. 

(3)  The  Fallopian  tubes  and  fimbria  belong  to  the  most  resistant  and  rela- 
tively best  preserved  organs,  comparable  in  this  respect  to  the  more  resistant 
constituents  of  the  ovary  and  uterus  and  to  the  pelvis  of  the  kidney;  they 


SYNGENESIOTRANSPLANTATION  77 

tended  to  survive  even  under  homoiogenous  conditions  of  transplantation,  but 
were  unfavorably  affected  by  a  marked  disharmony  of  the  homoiogenous 
individuality  differentials. 

(4)  The  uterus  is,  on  the  whole,  also  a  resistant  organ,  although  certain  of 
its  constituents  may  show  less  resistance.  There  was  often  necrotic  material  in 
the  lumen  of  the  uterus  and  part  of  its  wall  could  be  destroyed.  The  epithelium 
and  the  peritoneal  endothelium  were  more  resistant,  while  the  unstriated 
muscle  tissue  was  more  readily  injured  after  homoiogenous  transplantation, 
and  cellular,  myxoid  and  predecidual  connective  tissue  underneath  the  epithe- 
lial structures  continued  to  live  only  if  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  transplant  manifested  a  high  degree  of  compatibility. 

(5)  In  kidney  transplants  the  tubules  and  glomeruli,  situated  in  the  peri- 
phery of  the  transplant,  were  most  prone  to  survive;  the  collecting  tubules, 
with  pelvis  and  ureter  showing  the  least  differentiation,  were  very  resistant. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  convoluted  tubules  were  very  sensitive  to  the  injurious 
action  of  the  unfavorable  individuality  differentials. 

(6)  After  transplantation  of  pieces  of  liver,  peripheral  bile  ducts  remained 
alive  in  about  fifty  per  cent  of  our  transplants  for  1  or  1^  months;  they 
showed  mitoses  mainly  in  the  earlier  periods,  as,  for  instance,  14  days  after 
transplantation,  but  some  mitoses  were  visible  at  later  periods.  The  bile  ducts 
corresponded,  therefore,  in  their  power  ,of  resistance  to  unfavorable  indi- 
viduality differentials,  to  the  small  follicles  of  the  ovary  or  to  spleen  tissue. 
New  bile  ducts  could  develop  and  these  structures  were  able  to  survive  for  as 
long  as  a  month  and  a  half,  even  under  homoiogenous  conditions,  although 
they  were  better  preserved  after  syngenesiotransplantation.  In  38  per  cent  of 
the  transplants  in  which  bile  ducts  were  preserved,  or  in  a  little  more  than 
on-sixth  of  all  our  transplantations  of  liver,  liver  cells  as  well  survived,  which 
is  about  the  frequency  with  which  megakaryocytes  were  preserved  in  the 
spleen.  However,  liver  cells  did  not  survive  if  the  individuality  differentials  of 
the  transplant  were  homoiogenous;  but  they  could  survive  in  favorable  syn- 
genesiotransplants,  under  conditions  in  which  also  mitoses  were  seen  in  the 
bile  ducts.  In  certain  instances,  a  liver  cell  with  two  nuclei  was  noted,  but  only 
in  one  case  was  a  mitosis  seen  in  such  a  cell.  It  may  be  remarked  in  this  con- 
nection that  under  exceptional  conditions  mitoses  may  appear  in  young  carti- 
lage cells,  or  even  in  transplanted  cells  of  striated  muscle  tissue.  As  in  ovary 
and  kidney  transplants,  so  too  in  liver  transplants  the  necrotic  center  could 
remain  partly  unorganized  for  a  long  time. 

(7)  Spleen:  Between  36  and  47  days  following  transplantation  spleen  tissue 
was  found  preserved  about  as  frequently  as  bile  ducts  in  liver  transplants  or 
small  follicles  in  ovarian  grafts.  Here,  again,  homoiotoxins  proved  injurious 
and  the  injury  increased  with  increasing  time  following  transplantation; 
eventually,  only  fibrous  tissue  with  blood  pigment  was  found.  Syngenesio- 
transplants  were  more  favorable  and  in  these  as  well  as  in  autogenous  grafts 
Malphigian  bodies,  blood  sinuses  containing  erythrocytes,  mononuclear,  pha- 
gocytic cells  and  trabeculae  were  seen,  and  at  later  stages  megakaryocytes. 

(8)  Testicle:  Testicle  tubules  as  a  rule  perished,  but  a  few  peripheral  ones, 


78  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

lined  merely  with  Sertoli  cells,  could  survive.  Testicle  tubules  were  destroyed 
also  after  autogenous  transplantation;  this  effect  is  therefore  due  to  a  non- 
specific injury,  by  which  the  more  differentiated  testicle  cells  are  affected. 

(9)  Striated  muscle  tissue  was  relatively  resistant  to  unfavorable  individu- 
ality differentials,  and  even  under  the  action  of  strong  homoiotoxins  some 
muscle  fibers  could  survive  and  show  amitotic  nuclear  proliferation. 

(10)  Fat  tissue,  at  least  in  part,  tended  to  survive  even  after  homoiogenous 
transplantation;  but  it  was  readily  invaded  by  connective  tissue  and  by  cells 
which  acted  as  phagocytes,  but  which  could  in  addition  form  giant  cells,  and  in 
some  cases,  by  lymphocytes.  The  tendency  to  invasion  by  these  cells  differed 
in  different  species ;  it  was  greatest  in  the  guinea  pig,  where  there  was  also  the 
greatest  tendency  to  the  formation  of  giant  cells,  and  it  was  least  marked  in 
the  mouse;  rat  tissue,  with  which  we  are  here  more  directly  concerned, 
showed  an  intermediate  position. 

(11)  Bone,  bone  marrow  and  cartilage:  As  stated  previously,  cartilage  with 
the  surrounding  perichondrium  is  a  very  resistant  tissue,  which  could  survive 
and  undergo  regenerative  growth  processes  even  under  very  severe  homoio- 
genous conditions.  In  bone,  the  bone  cells  tend  to  die,  especially  in  the  central 
parts,  owing  to  a  lack  of  nourishment.  In  the  peripheral  parts  of  transplanted 
bone  it  was  often  difficult  to  decide  whether  the  cells  situated  here  had  come 
from  the  surrounding  connective  tissue,  or  whether  they  were  actually  pre- 
served bone  cells.  Under  certain  conditions,  new  bone  could  be  formed  in 
transplants  around  the  cartilage  as  well  as  in  the  bone  marrow.  The  bone  mar- 
row, as  a  rule,  survived  only  under  very  favorable  conditions  of  syngenesio- 
transplantation. 

In  general,  we  may  conclude  that  the  results  of  transplantation  of  various 
tissues  depend  upon  inner  and  outer  factors,  the  former  situated  in  the  trans- 
plant and  the  latter  in  the  host.  Among  the  inner  factors  localized  in  the 
transplant,  (a)  the  most  prominent  is  the  constitution  of  the  individuality 
differential,  which  in  its  relation  to  the  individuality  differential  of  the  host 
largely  determines  the  fate  of  the  transplant ;  (b)  important  too,  is  the  degree 
of  sensitiveness  to  injury  or  the  power  of  resistance  of  the  transplant  or  its 
various  constituent  parts  to  injurious  conditions ;  and  (c)  also  influencing  the 
survival  of  the  graft  are  certain  accessory  conditions,  such  as  the  presence  of 
hyaline  tissue  or  other  resistant  tissues  in  the  transplant,  which  protect  the 
more  sensitive  parts ;  the  thickness  of  the  transplant,  which  affects  the  size  of 
the  central,  least  nourished  parts ;  these  latter  tend  to  die,  while  the  peripheral 
parts  remain  alive.  In  addition,  the  age  of  the  transplant  may  play  a  certain 
role,  as  well  as  its  possession  of  a  peculiar  tissue  constitution,  which  influences 
the  activity  of  the  lymphocytes  of  the  host.  Among  the  outer  factors  affecting 
the  results  of  transplantation  are  the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differen- 
tials of  the  host,  the  reactivity  of  the  host  against  strange  individuality  differ- 
entials, and  the  presence  in  the  host  of  immune  substances  directed  against  the 
transplant ;  besides,  the  place  of  transplantation  may  be  of  significance. 

If  we  make  allowance  for  the  variations  caused  by  all  these  factors,  our  ex- 
periments have  shown  that  as  a  rule  pieces  of  different  tissues,  transplanted 


SYNGENESIOTRANSPLANTATION  79 

from  the  same  donor  into  the  same  host,  behave  in  the  same  manner  and  have 
a  corresponding  fate.  There  are  hosts  in  which  all  pieces  are  well  preserved, 
others  in  which  all  transplants  are  destroyed,  and  still  others  in  which  the 
transplants  show  an  intermediate  degree  of  preservation. 

The  behavior  of  lymphocytes  towards  different  types  of  transplants.  We 
have  discussed  non-specific  factors  which  influence  the  fate  of  transplants, 
without  any  participation  of  lymphocytes  or  connective  tissue  cells  being 
necessary  in  this  process ;  we  have  also  discussed  non-specific  reactions  on  the 
part  of  connective  tissue  towards  the  transplants.  Likewise,  in  the  case  of  the 
lymphocytes,  factors  other  than  the  individuality  differentials  may  be  present 
in  or  around  the  transplant,  and  may  influence  the  activity  of  these  cells 
towards  the  graft.  Thus  foreign  bodies  around  or  in  a  transplant  may  cause 
an  accumulation  of  lymphocytes,  as  may  also  epidermal  cysts,  in  some  in- 
stances even  if  the  latter  are  autogenous  in  nature.  Mildly  inflammatory  altera- 
tions of  a  chemical  nature,  or  more  severe  ones  acting  at  a  distance  from  the 
exciting  agent,  may  attract  lymphocytes.  But  it  seems  that  necrotic  material 
does  not  exert  a  direct  attraction  on  these  cells ;  they  do  not  usually  invade 
necrotic  material  unless  it  is  invaded  first  and  organized  by  growing  connective 
tissue;  in  the  latter,  some  collections  of  lymphocytes  are  often  found.  But  the 
most  characteristic  feature  of  the  lymphocytes  is  that  they  are  attracted  by 
strange  individuality  differentials.  The  degree  of  this  lymphocytic  reaction 
shows  a  curve  which  has  its  maximum  at  a  point  intermediate  between  the 
autogenous  and  the  severe  homoiogenous  zone  of  the  relationship  spectrum ; 
the  lymphocytic  infiltration  is  frequently  less  marked  in  the  latter  zone,  because 
here  the  greater  part  of  the  transplant  has  become  either  necrotic  or  is  replaced 
by  host  tissue.  The  maximum  of  the  curve  may  be  in  the  syngenesious  zone  or 
in  the  zone  of  mild  homoiogenous  reactions.  In  the  different  types  of  trans- 
plantations lymphocytes  move  usually  by  way  of  the  lymph  vessels,  but  to  a 
lesser  degree,  also  by  way  of  the  blood  vessels,  in  the  direction  towards  and 
into  the  center  of  the  transplant.  To  a  certain  extent  they  tend  to  accumulate  in 
different  places  in  different  kinds  of  transplanted  tissues.  It  is  of  special  inter- 
est that  they  seem  to  prefer  certain  tissues  to  others.  In  the  thyroid  they  may 
first  collect  along  the  inner  border  of  the  ring  of  preserved  acinar  tissue.  In 
cartilage-fat  transplants  they  accumulate  in  the  fat  tissue,  where  there  is  a 
deposit  of  fibrous  tissue  containing  vessels;  but  they  also  collect  around  the 
perichondrium  and  cartilage  and  they  may  invade  that  portion  of  the  cartilage 
which  consists  almost  entirely  of  cartilage  cells.  In  the  skin  they  often  avoid 
the  sebaceous  glands  and  the  epithelium  of  the  hair  follicles  when  this  is  pre- 
served. Of  special  interest  is  their  behavior  in  the  ovary ;  here  they  infiltrate 
first  the  fat  and  connective  tissue  surrounding  the  ovary ;  they  then  accumu- 
late in  the  interstitial  gland,  around  the  germinal  epithelial  cyst  and  in  the 
central  connective  tissue  underneath  this  cyst,  as  well  as  around  the  medullary 
ducts,  and  they  may  invade  also  corpora  lutea.  However,  they  avoid  the  pre- 
served follicles  and  only  quite  late  and  rather  rarely  do  they  invade  the  latter. 
In  this  case,  the  difference  between  their  behavior  towards  different  con- 
stituents of  the  same  organ  is  almost  as  great  as  the  difference  in  their  reaction 


80  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

would  be  against  two  distinct  transplants,  one  autogenous  and  the  other 
homoiogenous  in  nature.  Two  interpretations  of  this  phenomenon  are  possible : 
( 1 )  it  may  be  assumed  that  different  structures  after  transplantation  produce 
and  give  off  different  quantities  of  the  individuality  differential ;  thus  cartilage 
and  fat  tissue  attract  the  lymphocytes  in  rat  and  guinea  pig  much  less  actively 
than  does  the  thyroid  gland.  There  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  metabolical- 
ly  less  active  cartilage  substance  produces  a  smaller  quantity  of  individuality 
differential  per  unit  of  time  than  does  the  metabolically  more  active  thyroid 
gland.  However,  this  interpretation  probably  does  not  apply  to  the  ovarian 
structures;  preserved  follicles  can  hardly  be  less  active  in  the  production  of 
individuality  differentials  than  is  interstitial  gland  tissue,  or  even  corpus 
luteum  tissue;  (2)  it  is  more  likely  that,  in  this  and  in  other  similar  or  even 
more  striking  cases,  as  for  instance,  in  adrenal  gland  transplants  in  mouse,  in 
addition  to  the  individuality  differentials  certain  tissue-specific  substances 
attract  the  lymphocytes;  but  at  the  same  time  it  is  probable  that,  in  this  in- 
stance, also  the  individuality  differentials  play  a  role,  their  action  being  much 
re-inforced  by  that  of  substances  given  off  by  certain  types  of  cells  and  tissues 
and  not  identical  with  the  individuality  differentials.  It  is  conceivable  that  these 
two  substances — the  individuality  differentials  and  the  tissue-specific  sub- 
stances— are  chemically  linked  to  each  other  and  that  this  combination  exerts 
its  influence  on  the  lymphocytes,  either  directly  or  in  conjunction  with  the 
individuality  differentials1  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host.  Such  an 
interpretation  seems  more  probable  than  the  assumption  that  the  interaction  of 
the  mutually  not  quite  compatible  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  trans- 
plant interfere  more  effectively  with  the  metabolism  of  some  types  of  cells 
than  with  that  of  others,  and  that  as  the  result  of  this  interference,  substances 
are  produced  which  attract  the  lymphocytes.  In  the  transplant  of  the  adrenal 
gland  of  the  mouse  lymphocytes  are  attracted  in  large  masses  if  certain  re- 
gressive, degenerative  changes  have  taken  place  in  the  cortical  cells,  provided 
this  degenerative  process  does  not  exceed  a  certain  limit.  The  rapidity  and 
frequency  with  which  this  regressive  stage  is  reached  in  the  cortical  cells  is 
greatly  influenced  by  the  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  donor.  In  addition  to  the  interpretations  mentioned  already,  after  all 
we  cannot  altogether  exclude  the  possibility  that  in  these  cells  larger  amounts 
of  individuality  differentials  are  produced  than  in  the  well  preserved  cortical 
cells.  Also  to  be  considered  is  the  possibility  that  in  certain  well  preserved 
tissues  influences  inhibiting  the  invasion  of  the  lymphocytes  may  exist.  These 
are  problems  which  still  remain  to  be  solved. 

(b)  Syngenesiotransplantation  in  guinea  pigs.  As  in  rats,  so  we  compared 
in  guinea  pigs  transplantations  between  brothers  and  sisters,  from  parents  to 
children,  and  from  children  to  parents.  In  addition,  transplantations  from 
grandparents  to  grandchildren  and  from  grandchildren  to  grandparents  were 
carried  out.  The  guinea  pigs  were  either  very  young,  as  yet  sexually  immature, 
or  they  were  young  adults ;  also,  the  rats  used  in  the  experiments  already  re- 
ported had  been  young. 

In  the  guinea  pigs  we  carried  out  three  series  of  experiments ;  the  largest 


SYNGENESIOTRANSPLANTATION  81 

number  of  transplantations  was  made  in  the  third  series.  The  time  of  ex- 
amination varied  between  7  and  40  days  in  the  different  experiments ;  only 
those  transplants  examined  not  earlier  than  17  days  after  transplantation  were 
included  in  series  III,  while  in  series  II  some  experiments  are  included  in 
which  the  examination  took  place  at  an  earlier  time. 

TABLE  II 


Series  I 

Series  II 

Series  III 

Homoiogenous  transplantations 

1.85 

Brother  to  brother  or  sister 

2.34 

2.78 

2 

Parents  to  children 

1.97 

2.47 

1.55  (1+/2-) 

Children  to  parents 

3  (only  1 
experiment) 

1.84 

1.70  (2-) 

Grandparents  to  grandchildren 

1.75  (2-) 

Grandchildren  to  grandparents 

1.55  (1+/2-) 

The  average  results  obtained  are  shown  in  the  accompanying  table  II.  There 
is  only  one  average  figure  for  homoiotransplantation  given ;  it  was  obtained  in 
series  I  and  it  is  probably  too  high ;  this  is  due  very  likely  to  the  fact  that  only 
a  rather  small  number  of  transplantations  was  made,  and  that  among  these 
there  were  two  grades  which  exceeded  the  usual  range  in  homoiotransplanta- 
tion, one  of  them  closely  approximating  the  results  obtained  in  autogenous 
transplantations.  It  is  possible  that  in  this  instance  we  had  to  deal  with  related 
guinea  pigs.  If  we  make  allowance  for  this  discrepancy,  the  table  shows  that 
the  grades  in  syngenesiotransplantations  are  higher  than  in  homoiotransplan- 
tations,  but  that  they  are  nearer  those  characteristic  of  homoiogenous  than  of 
autogenous  transplantations.  This  was  true  also  in  the  experiments  with  rats, 
which  we  have  already  discussed. 

Taking  these  grades  as  a  whole,  the  results  of  the  syngenesiotransplanta- 
tions are  intermediate  between  those  obtained  in  autogenous  and  homoiogenous 
transplants  in  either  of  two  ways :  (1)  In  a  number  of  experiments  the  grades 
in  the  individual  experiments  vary,  approaching  either  the  results  in  autoge- 
nous or  in  homoiogenous  transplantations.  In  these  cases  it  is  merely  the  aver- 
ages which  are  intermediate.  (2)  In  other  transplantations  the  grades  of  the 
individual  experiments  are  intermediate.  In  order  to  understand  the  manner 
in  which  such  an  intermediate  condition  may  come  about,  we  may  distinguish 
in  the  reaction  against  the  transplants  on  the  part  of  the  host  cells,  two  periods, 
the  first  one  tending  from  6  to  12  days  following  transplantation,  the  second 
one  covering  the  time  from  the  12th  day  to  the  time  of  examination.  The  re- 
actions in  the  thyroid  gland  may  be  cited  as  an  example  of  varying  results  in 
these  two  periods.  During  period  I,  the  connective  tissue  reaction  takes  place. 
If  during  this  time  the  production  and  accumulation  of  injurious  individuality 
differential  substances  around  and  in  the  transplant  has  been  strong,  there 
is  an  active  ingrowth  of  connective  tissue  cells  towards  the  center  of  the  graft 
and  this  tissue  soon  becomes  transformed  into  hyaline  substance;  the  ingrowth 


82  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  blood  vessels  is  very  limited.  But  if  there  is  no  or  only  a  slight  accumula- 
tion of  injurious  substances  in  this  earlier  period,  then  the  connective  tissue 
cells  form  a  myxoid  connective  tissue  along  the  inner  margin  of  the  ring  of 
acinar  tissue  and  there  is  here  a  good  vascular  supply.  But  in  this  case  a 
lymphocytic  reaction  may  be  expected  to  set  in  sometime  during  period  II, 
whenever  toxic  individuality  differential  substances  produced  have  accumu- 
lated in  sufficient  quantity  to  attract  lymphocytes  in  larger  numbers ;  these 
latter  then  invade  the  graft,  perhaps  together  with  a  restricted  amount  of  con- 
nective tissue,  which  may  move  between  and  separate  some  of  the  acini.  How- 
ever, in  general  the  severity  of  the  reaction  against  the  transplants  increases 
with  increasing  time  following  the  grafting  and  the  earlier  syngenesio-reactions 
may  gradually  become  converted  into  severe  homoio-reactions  through 
intensification  of  the  fibrous-tissue  reaction  together  with  lymphocytic  in- 
filtration, both  of  these  factors  leading  to  an  increasing  destruction  of  the 
transplanted  thyroid.  In  cases  in  which  paired  organs  from  one  donor  were 
transplanted  to  two  brothers,  or  from  a  child  to  both  parents,  the  reaction  in 
the  two  hosts  was  about  the  same  in  the  majority  of  instances;  this  happened 
especially  in  those  instances  in  which  the  reaction  was  severe.  Under  these 
conditions,  a  differentiation  between  results  obtained  in  these  hosts  could  not 
very  well  be  expected.  However,  sometimes  the  reaction  differed  in  the  two 
hosts:  there  could  be  a  severe  lymphocytic  reaction  in  the  one  and  a  slight 
reaction  in  the  other,  and  such  a  separation  of  the  reactions  occurred  also  when 
the  parents  were  derived  from  different  strains  of  guinea  pigs — one,  for  ex- 
ample, being  curly  and  the  other  smooth-haired.  It  was  noted  in  such  a  case 
that  the  reaction  against  tissues  exchanged  between  parents  and  children  was 
severe,  while  on  the  contrary,  there  was  some  evidence  that,  when  the  parents 
might  have  been  related  to  each  other,  the  reaction  against  the  transplanted 
tissues  was  relatively  slight.  In  those  instances  in  which  two  organs  such  as 
thyroid  and  ovary  were  transplanted  from  the  same  donor  into  the  same  host, 
the  reactions  against  both  organs  corresponded  to  each  other. 

In  a  general  way,  the  grades  were  highest  in  the  brother-to-brother  (sister) 
transplantations,  and  there  was  no  distinct  difference  between  the  two  re- 
ciprocal types  of  transplantations  when  tissues  were  exchanged  between 
parents  and  children.  Such  a  result  might  be  expected  when  random  trans- 
plantations between  non-inbred  families  of  guinea  pigs  were  carried  out.  In 
the  rat,  no  definite  difference  between  the  three  types  of  syngenesiotransplan- 
tation  was  noticeable. 


Chapter  J 

The  Individuality  Differentials  of  Closely 

Inbred  Animals 

Closely  inbred  animals  are  those  which  have  been  bred  by  brother  and 
sister  matings  in  a  sufficiently  large  number  of  successive  generations. 
As  the  result  of  this  procedure,  these  animals  have  a  genetic  composi- 
tion which  has  become  even  more  similar  than  that  of  ordinary  brothers  and 
sisters;  they  exemplify  an  intensified  brother  and  sister  relationship.  This 
close  relationship  should  exist  even  between  animals  which  do  not  belong  to 
the  same  litter,  but  which  have  common  ancestors  in  not  far  distant  genera- 
tions, and  after  very  long-continued  inbreeding,  also  between  animals  whose 
common  ancestors  are  somewhat  farther  removed. 

Theoretically,  after  from  eight  to  ten  consecutive  brother-sister  matings,  the 
genetic  composition  of  different  individuals  should  be  about  the  same  (Sewall 
Wright)  ;  their  individuality  differentials  should  then  be  almost  as  nearly 
related  as  are  those  of  different  parts  of'  the  same  organism  or  of  identical 
twins.  However,  our  transplantation  experiments  have  shown  that  such  an 
identity  of  individuality  differentials  among  different  members  of  the  same 
closely  inbred  strain  or  family  is  approached  with  very  much  greater  diffi- 
culty than  would  have  been  anticipated.  As  factors  which  might  prevent  or 
delay  a  homozygous  state,  we  have,  in  the  first  place,  to  consider  mutations  in 
the  germ  cells,  which  may  be  expected  to  take  place  spontaneously  and  with  a 
frequency  which  is  not  yet  known.  In  the  second  place,  a  selection  of  the  ani- 
mals to  be  mated  might  influence  the  results.  Thus  Dr.  Helen  D.  King,  in  her 
inbreeding  experiments,  selected  in  every  case  the  most  vigorous  rats  for 
breeding;  this  might  imply  a  selection  of  the  most  heterozygous  individuals, 
those  which  differ  most  in  their  genetic  constitution  and  in  which  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  are  most  dissimilar  from  those  of  brothers  and  sisters. 
Such  a  process  of  selection  might  delay  the  attainment  of  perfect  homozygosity 
in  the  closely  inbred  strains,  but  this  retardation  would  probably  not  be  of 
very  great  consequence.  A  third  factor  involves  the  relationship  between  the 
animals  in  the  first  brother-sister  mating;  if  these  two  individuals  are  very 
different  in  their  genetic  constitution,  a  greater  number  of  consecutive  genera- 
tions of  brother-sister  matings  will  be  required  to  produce  homozygosity  than 
if  they  are  very  similar  to  each  other,  and  lastly  there  exists  the  possibility 
that  a  difference  in  the  individuality  differentials  between  host  and  donor  of  a 
transplant  will  be  found  if  a  branching-off  from  the  common  line  of  descent 
has  taken  place  at  a  certain  point  and  if  the  two  individuals  whose  individuality 
differentials  we  wish  to  compare  belong  to  different  branches ;  the  difference 
thus  developed  should  be  greater  the  further  back  the  branching-off  from  the 
common  line  of  descent  occurred. 

83 


84 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


We  carried  out  experiments  ( 1 )  with  rats  closely  inbred  by  Dr.  Helen  D. 
King  at  the  Wistar  Institute;  (2)  with  guinea  pigs  closely  inbred  at  the  De- 
partment of  Agriculture  by  Dr.  Sewall  Wright  and  Dr.  Eaton,  and  later  by 
Dr.  McPhee  and  Dr.  Eaton,  and  lastly,  (3)  with  various  strains  of  mice  closely 
inbred  by  Mr.  Marsh  of  the  State  Institute  for  Study  of  Malignant  Diseases 
in  Buffalo,  and  others  closely  inbred  by  C.  C.  Little  and  L.  C.  Strong  and  their 
associates  at  the  Jackson  Laboratory  in  Bar  Harbor.  A  small  series  of  experi- 
ments with  closely  inbred  chickens,  obtained  from  Dr.  H.  D.  Goodale  in  Wil- 
liamstown,  have  already  been  mentioned. 

(a)  The  individuality  differentials  in  closely  inbred  rats.  We  shall  now 
discuss,  first,  investigations  made  with  the  closely  inbred  rats  of  Dr.  Helen  D. 
King,  who  had  developed  two  distinct  inbred  strains,  A  and  B ;  these  had  the 
same  origin  but  they  had  been  bred  separately  for  many  generations  and  thus 
had  acquired  in  the  end  distinct  genetic  constitutions  and  individuality  differ- 
entials ;  in  addition,  hybrids  between  strains  A  and  B  were  obtained.  Three 
series  of  experiments  were  carried  out  with  these  animals.  In  the  first  one, 
made  mainly  in  1926,  rats  from  families  A  and  B,  belonging  to  generations  37 


Donor  and  Host 


TABLE  III 
(Series  I) 


Grades 


Combined  Grades 


A  to  A  (different  litters) 
B  to  B  (different  litters) 
A  to  A  (brothers  and  sisters) 
B  to  B  (brothers  and  sisters) 
A  to  B 
B  to  A 


1.82  (24  rats) 

1.92  (27  rats) 

1.68  (12  rats) 

2.55  (24  rats) 

1.67  (18  rats) 

1.57  (19  rats) 


1.87  (51  rats) 
2 .  26  (36  rats) 
1.62  (37  rats) 


TABLE  IV 
(Series  II) 


Donor  and  Host 


Grades 


Combined 
Grades 


A  to  A  (different  litters) 

B  to  B  (different  litters) 

A  to  A  (brothers  and  sisters) 

B  to  B  (brothers  and  sisters) 

A  to  B  or  B  to  A 

Homoiotransplantation  in  non-inbred  families 

(AXB)F<  (or  F»)  to  (AXB)F,  (different  litters) 

(AXB)F4  (or  Fs)  to  (AXB)Ft  (brothers  and  sisters) 

A  or  B  to  (AXB)F4 

(AXB)F«to  A  or  B 


1.16  (16  rats)  | 
1 .  65  (33  rats)  I 
2.60  (17  rats) | 
2.81  (19  rats) J 
1.37  (32  rats) 
1.36 

1.29  (12  rats) 
1.80  (26  rats) 
1.50  (13  rats) 
1.39  (13  rats) 


1.49  (49  rats) 
2.71  (36  rats) 


and  38,  40  and  41,  and  also  46  and  47  were  used ;  in  the  second  series  made  in 
1930  and  1931,  the  rats  belonged  to  the  60-67  generations,  and  in  the  third, 
most  recent  series,  made  from  the  year  1939  to  1941,  a  smaller  number  of  rats 


DIFFERENTIALS  OF  CLOSELY  INBRED  ANIMALS         85 

came  from  generations  91  and  92,  and  a  larger  number  from  generations  102 
to  106.  Somewhere  between  generations  92  and  102,  family  B  died  out  and 
from  then  on  only  strain  A  and  hybrids  between  strains  A  and  B  were  still 
available.  There  was  therefore  a  wide  range  of  inbred  generations,  extending 
from  the  36th  to  the  106th,  and  a  time  span  of  about  15  years  in  the  progressive 
inbreeding  of  the  rats,  which  were  used  in  these  experiments. 

Series  I  (Table  III).  The  grades  in  transplantations  in  different  litters  in 
inbred  strains  are  slightly  better  than  the  average  grades  in  homoiogenous 
transplantations  in  non-inbred  rats  and  the  grades  are  somewhat  higher  in 
strain  B  than  in  strain  A.  The  combined  grade  of  the  transplants  between 
brothers  and  sisters  in  strains  A  and  B  is  higher  than  the  grade  of  transplants 
between  different  litters.  This  is  quite  definite  in  strain  B,  while  in  strain  A 
there  is  no  marked  difference  between  the  two  grades ;  the  reaction  happens  to 
be  even  slightly  less  severe  in  transplants  between  rats  belonging  to  different 
litters.  Transplants  from  family  A  to  family  B  (grade  1.67),  and  from  family 
B  to  family  A  (grade  1.57)  may  serve  as  controls.  Both  these  average  grades 
correspond  about  to  the  grades  of  ordinary  homoiotransplants ;  they  are  lower 
than  the  average  grades  of  transplanted  tissues  exchanged  within  family  A 
or  family  B.  From  these  data  we  may  conclude  that  as  a  result  of  close 
inbreeding  in  rats  for  37  to  47  generations  in  families  A  and  B,  only  a  very 
slight  progress  towards  a  homozygous  condition  has  been  accomplished. 

Series  II  (Table  IV).  A  comparison  of  the  grades  in  series  I  and  II  shows 
that  there  is  an  improvement  in  the  grades  in  transplantations  between  differ- 
ent litters  neither  in  family  A  nor  in  family  B  in  series  II  over  the  corre- 
sponding grades  in  series  I.  However,  in  the  second  series,  in  both  families  the 
grades  obtained  in  transplantations  between  litter  mates  are  not  only  better 
than  the  grades  obtained  in  transplantations  between  different  litters,  but  they 
are  also  better  than  in  the  transplantations  between  litter  mates  in  series  I. 
Also,  the  grades  in  transplantations  between  hybrids  (AXB)F4  or  F5  are 
improved  to  a  certain  degree  if  litter  mates  are  used.  But  in  these  transplan- 
tations Ihe  results  are  not  so  good  as  in  transplantations  between  litter  mates 
in  families  A  or  B.  Such  a  difference  might  be  expected,  because  in  hybrids 
there  is  a  greater  chance  for  unlike  genes  to  accumulate  in  brothers  when 
both  A  and  B  contribute  to  the  genes  of  the  fertilized  germ  cells.  Trans- 
plantations from  parent  to  hybrid  give  somewhat  better  results  than  the 
reciprocal  transplantations,  but  both  elicit  severe  homoiogenous  reactions  as 
an  indication  that  a  homozygous  genetic  constitution  has  not  yet  been  reached 
in  either  family  A  or  B.  Exchange  of  tissues  between  families  A  and  B  like- 
wise corresponds  to  a  severe  homoio-reaction,  in  accordance  with  expectations. 

It  is  especially  the  results  of  transplantations  between  litter  mates  in  inbred 
strains  A  and  B  which  suggest  that  some  progress  towards  a  greater  homo- 
geneity in  the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials  has  been  made 
through  continued  close  inbreeding.  In  the  exchange  of  tissues  between  broth- 
ers and  sisters  of  the  same  inbred  family,  the  factor  of  a  difference  in  the  dis- 
tance of  relationship  between  different  litters  is  eliminated.  It  is  not  probable 
that  the  lack  of  a  diminution  in  the  severity  of  the  reaction  in  the  exchange  of 


86  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tissues  between  different  litters  of  the  same  inbred  family  is  entirely  due  to  a 
greater  distance  of  relationship  between  these  litters  under  these  conditions, 
although  this  factor  may  play  a  certain  role,  but  that  in  exchange  of  tissues 
between  members  of  different  litters  the  threshold  required  for  a  mitigated 
reaction  had  not  yet  been  reached  in  series  I  as  well  as  in  series  II.  In  the  case 
of  brothers  and  sisters  it  is  probable  that  the  decrease  in  the  number  and  kind 
of  unlike  genes  which  were  present  in  different  individuals  helped  to  make  the 
individuality  differentials  so  much  alike  that  the  reaction  against  the  strange 
individuality  differentials  was  diminished.  This  increased  similarity  in  the 
constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials  between  brothers  and  sisters  of 
these  inbred  strains,  which  in  many  cases  approached  an  autogenous  state,  was 
brought  out  also  in  multiple  simultaneous  transplantations  of  various  tissues 
into  the  same  host;  here  all  the  tissues  behaved  like  autogenous  transplants, 
which  is  in  accordance  with  the  general  rule  that  in  transplantations  from  the 
same  donor  to  the  same  host,  all  tissues  behave  in  the  same  way  if  we  make 
allowance  for  certain  complicating  factors,  which  we  have  discussed  previous- 
ly. Very  instructive  was  also  an  experiment  in  which  thyroids  with  adjoining 
tissues  were  successfully  grafted  into  brothers  and  sisters.  After  two  successive 
transplantations,  and  50  days  after  the  first  transplantation,  thyroid,  para- 
thyroid and  fat  tissue  behaved  like  autotransplants ;  but  after  the  third  trans- 
plantation, the  73-day-old  transplant  showed  a  definite  lymphocytic  infiltration, 
although  otherwise  it  behaved  like  an  autotransplant. 

This  experiment  confirms  the  conclusion  that  in  series  II  a  complete  autog- 
enous state  has  not  yet  been  reached  between  brothers  and  sisters ;  but  on  the 
other  hand,  it  is  probable  that  a  further  progress,  although  a  not  very  consider- 
able one,  towards  a  homozygous  condition  in  families  A  and  B  has  been  made 
in  continued  propagation  by  brother-sister  matings  in  the  interval  between  the 
37th  to  47th  generations  and  the  60th  to  67th  generations.  However,  in  addi- 
tion the  strength  of  the  reaction  may  depend  not  only  on  the  genes  of  the 
donor,  which  are  strange  to  the  host,  but  also  on  the  genes  of  the  host,  which 
differ  from  those  in  the  donor,  although  the  importance  of  the  strange  host 
genes  is  presumably  less  than  of  those  of  the  donor. 

Series  III.  In  this  series,  as  a  rule,  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  as 
well  as  pieces  of  striated  muscle  tissue,  were  transplanted  and  examination 
took  place  20  days  later.  Two  groups  of  experiments  were  carried  out.  In  the 
first  group  ( 1 )  the  hosts  and  donors  were  young  rats,  varying  in  age  between 
about  one  and  three  months.  In  the  second  group  (2)  the  age  of  the  animals 
ranged  between  four  and  seven  months.  The  results  obtained  in  these  experi- 
ments are  shown  in  table  V. 

If  we  compare  the  transplantations  in  young  rats  (group  (1))  and  in  some- 
what older  rats  (group  (2)),  we  notice  that  grafts  between  brothers  and 
sisters,  in  family  A  in  group  ( 1 ) ,  behave  about  like  autotransplants,  while  in 
group  (2),  they  behave  like  good  syngenesiotransplants.  The  transplants  be- 
tween different  litters  of  the  inbred  family  have  grades  corresponding  to  those 
between  good  syngenesiotransplants;  again,  the  grades  are  slightly  better  in 
group  ( 1 ) .  A  comparison  with  series  I  shows  that  transplants  between  differ- 


DIFFERENTIALS  OF  CLOSELY  INBRED  ANIMALS         87 

ent  litters  as  well  as  those  between  brothers  and  sisters  elicit  a  much  less  an- 
tagonistic reaction  in  series  III  than  in  series  I.  As  compared  with  series  II, 
the  grades  are  higher  in  series  III  in  transplantations  between  different  litters. 


TABLE  V 

(Series  III) 

Group  (1)  Young 

rats. 

Group  (2)  Older  rats. 

Donor  and  Host 

Grades 

Grades 

A  to  A  (different  litters) 

2.82  (  7  rats) 

2.72  (10  rats) 

A  to  A  (brothers  or  sisters) 

3.10  (22  rats) 

2.77  (  7  rats) 

(AXB)F<and  (BXA)F<  (different 

combinations,  different  litters) 

3.12  (  6  rats) 

2.18  (  2  rats) 

(AXB)F<to  (AXB)F, 

brothers 

or 

or 

3.12  (  6  rats) 

(BXA)F«to  (BXA)F< 

sisters 

A  to  (AXB)F< 

2.39  (  4  rats) 

(AXB)F«or  (BXA)F4toA 

2.87  (10  rats) 

2.23  (4  rats) 

B  to  A  (91-92  generations) 

1.48  (  7  rats)  20  days 

1.84  (  7  rats)  12 

days 

In  transplantations  between  brothers  and  sisters  the  results  are  better  in  young 
rats  of  group  (1)  in  series  III  than  in  series  II,  but  about  the  same  in  the 
older  rats  of  group  (2).  We  may  then  conclude  that  considerable  progress  has 
been  made  in  the  direction  towards  a  homozygous  condition  from  series  I  to 
series  III,  and  that  progress  has  also  been  made  from  series  II  to  series  III, 
although  even  in  series  II  the  reactions  between  brothers  and  sisters  were 
much  less  antagonistic  than  in  series  I. 

In  all  three  series  the  reactions  against  transplants  between  different  families 
(A  and  B)  were  about  alike  and  corresponded  to  homoiogenous  relations  of 
the  individuality  differentials.  The  grades,  both  in  the  transplants  between 
different  litters  as  well  as  between  brothers  and  sisters  of  the  hybrids  (AXB), 
corresponded  to  autogenous  relations  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  group 
1.  In  group  2,  the  grades  of  transplants  between  different  litters  of  hybrids 
were  those  of  an  average  syngenesio-reaction ;  they  were  much  less  favorable  in 
group  2  than  in  group  1.  But  the  reactions  in  groups  1  and  2  of  series  III  were 
much  better  than  the  corresponding  reactions  in  series  II.  Also,  the  reactions 
in  transplantations  from  Family  A  to  the  hybrid  or  from  the  hybrid  to  Family 
A  were  much  milder  in  series  III  than  in  series  II.  In  series  III  these  reactions 
in  young  rats  of  group  1  corresponded  to  good  syngenesiotransplantations, 
while  in  the  somewhat  older  rats  of  group  2  they  corresponded  to  syngenesio- 
reactions  of  medium  intensity.  The  average  was  slightly,  but  not  markedly, 
higher  in  transplants  from  family  A  to  the  hybrid  than  in  the  reciprocal  trans- 
plantations. Similar  results  in  this  regard  were  obtained  in  series  II,  and  this 
might  be  expected  if  a  completely  autogenous  condition  of  the  individuality 
differentials  had  not  yet  been  attained  in  the  families  A  and  B. 

Of  interest  in  the  third  series  is  also  the  difference  in  the  grades  in  the 


88  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

groups  of  the  young  and  the  somewhat  older  rats,  which  agrees  with  the  gen- 
eral observation  that  when  donors  and  hosts  are  very  young,  the  reactions  are 
milder  than  in  older  animals.  This  difference  cannot  be  due  to  a  lack  of  in- 
dividuality differentials  in  the  former,  because  such  differentials  are  present ; 
but  it  is  due  rather  to  a  lesser  sensitiveness  to  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials, or  to  a  not  yet  fully  developed  mode  of  reaction  in  the  younger  animals. 
In  addition,  the  fact  must  be  taken  into  account  that  younger  tissues  grow 
more  vigorously  than  older  ones,  and  this  condition  is  associated  with  a  greater 
ability  to  overcome  the  effect  of  the  antagonistic  reactions  of  the  host ;  it  may 
also  be  that  tissues  growing  more  rapidly  do  not  give  off  individuality  differen- 
tial substances  in  as  large  amounts  as  the  more  differentiated  tissues  in  which 
the  functional  activity  predominates.  In  accordance  with  these  considerations, 
we  noticed  that  in  the  group  of  younger  rats  the  grades  are  higher,  even  in 
transplantations  from  hybrids  to  an  inbred  parent  strain,  where  the  derivatives 
of  strange  genes  are  introduced  into  the  host. 

A  comparison  of  the  reactions  observed  in  these  three  series  of  trans- 
plantations shows  that  a  continuous  progress  to  a  homozygous  condition  has 
been  made.  In  the  first  series  there  was  only  a  slight  indication  of  an  improve- 
ment in  grades  over  the  grades  of  ordinary  homoiogenous  and  syngenesious 
transplantations.  A  further  slight  progress  was  noted  in  series  II,  but  the 
greatest  advance  was  made  in  the  interval  between  series  II  and  III.  This 
means  that  after  about  forty  generations,  there  was  only  a  very  slight  progress 
towards  an  autogenous  character  of  the  individuality  differentials ;  some  ad- 
vance was  made  after  60  to  67  consecutive  brother-sister  transplantations ; 
but  the  greatest  advance  had  been  made  when  the  102nd  generation  was 
reached ;  however,  even  at  that  time  no  completely  homozygous  condition  had 
as  yet  been  attained.  This  finding  is  indicated  especially  by  the  transplanta- 
tions into  which  the  hybrids  entered ;  but  it  is  noticeable  also  in  the  transplan- 
tations within  the  inbred  family  A. 

It  seems  most  probable  that  the  slow  and  imperfect  progress  in  the  direction 
towards  a  homozygous  condition  in  the  inbred  rats  is  due  to  the  occurrence  of 
germinal  mutations,  leading  to  the  introduction  of  strange  genes  into  the  con- 
stitution of  host  and  donor  and  opposing,  therefore,  the  attainment  of  an 
identity  of  the  individuality  differentials,  which  continued  close  inbreeding 
would  otherwise  more  readily  have  accomplished.  But  of  these  two  counter- 
acting factors,  germinal  mutations  and  close  inbreeding,  the  effects  of  the 
latter  prove  to  be  the  more  potent,  and  therefore  the  individuality  differentials 
continue  to  progress  on  their  way  towards  increasing  mutual  similarity,  with- 
out, however,  reaching  this  goal  completely,  even  after  as  many  as  106  con- 
secutive brother-sister  matings. 


Chapter  8 

Individuality  Differentials  in  Closely 
Inbred  Guinea  Pigs 

Three  series  of  experiments  were  carried  out  with  guinea  pigs.  In  the 
first  series  (1927),  the  guinea  pigs  were  closely  inbred  in  the  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture  in  Washington,  by  Sewall  Wright  and  O.  N. 
Eaton.  In  a  second  supplementary  series  (1931),  these  experiments  were  con- 
tinued with  guinea  pigs  inbred  for  a  few  additional  generations,  likewise  in 
the  Department  of  Agriculture,  by  Hugh  C.  McPhee  and  O.  N.  Eaton ;  and  a 
third,  shorter  and  more  recent  series  was  carried  out  with  guinea  pigs  closely 
inbred  for  only  five  or  six  generations  at  the  Caworth  Farms.  The  guinea 
pigs  in  the  first  series  had  been  inbred  by  consecutive  brother-sister  matings 
mostly  for  from  17  to  23  generations,  while  the  large  majority  of  those  in  the 
second  series  had  been  inbred  for  from  20  to  25  generations.  In  the  first  series, 
five  inbred  families  were  used,  designated  as  2,  13,  32,  35  and  39;  2N  was  a 
line  of  family  2,  selected  for  colored  nose  spots.  This  line  was  exceptional, 
insofar  as  it  was  not  strictly  propagated  by  brother-sister  matings,  but  mating 
took  place  with  a  view  of  increasing  the  proportion  of  animals  carrying  this 
characteristic  nose  spot,  without  regard  to  relationship.  It  happened,  however, 
that  there  were  several  brother-sister  matings  in  this  line,  and  in  some  in- 
stances they  were  repeated  for  three  or  four  successive  generations,  according 
to  information  given  me  by  Dr.  O.  N.  Eaton.  The  degree  of  homogeneity  in 
the  various  families  differed  (Sewall  Wright,  Bull.,  U.  S.  Dept.  Agriculture, 
No.  1090).  As  controls,  guinea  pigs  from  a  non-inbred  B  group  and  non- 
inbred  guinea  pigs  obtained  from  various  dealers  were  used.  In  the  second 
series,  only  hybrids  CY  between  families  2  and  13y,  the  latter  an  otocephalic 
line  of  family  13,  and  hybrids  CP  between  families  13y  and  35  were  used  as 
donors  and  hosts  in  the  transplantation  experiments.  The  figure  following  the 
designation  of  the  family  indicates  the  number  of  consecutive  brother-sister 
matings.  In  the  hybrids,  the  upper  family  represents  the  male  and  the  lower 
the  female  partner.  The  figure  following  CP  or  CY  signifies  the  number  of 
generations  of  brother-sister  inbreeding  which  the  hybrids  had  undergone. 
CP-0  and  CY-0  represent  the  Flt  CP-1  and  CY-1  represent  the  F2  generations, 
and  so  on.  The  guinea  pigs  in  these  experiments  ranged  in  weight  between  200 
and  500  grams.  The  examinations  usually  took  place  between  the  20th  and  60th 
day,  but  in  some  experiments  they  were  made  as  late  as  about  Zy2  and  Sl/2 
months  following  transplantation.  We  shall  state  the  principal  results  obtained, 
without  distinguishing  between  series  I  and  II. 

A.  (1)  Transplantations  in  the  same  inbred  family,  host  and  donor  not 
being  nearly  related.  In  transplantations  from  32-17  to  32-19  and  in  other 
similar  transplantations  in  family  32  the  grade  was  3  +  .  This  indicates  auto- 

89 


90  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

genous  relationship  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  donor  and  host, 
but  in  another  experiment  in  family  32,  after  37  days  the  grade  was  3/3  —  , 
corresponding  to  a  very  good  syngenesio-reaction.  In  family  13,  the  grades 
varied  between  3—  and  3— /2  +  ,  even  if  both  donor  and  host  belonged  to  the 
20th  inbred  generation.  These  grades  correspond  to  good  syngenesio-reactions, 
indicating  the  existence  of  some  differences  in  the  constitution  of  the  individu- 
ality differentials.  They  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that,  in  family  13,  there  was  a 
greater  possibility  that  the  number  of  direct  common  ancestors  of  different 
individuals  was  not  so  large  as  in  the  other  families,  and  this  may  explain  the 
lack  of  autogenous  conditions,  at  least  in  some  cases.  In  family  2,  one  grade 
was  3—  (2-17  ->  2-17),  in  another  experiment  it  was  3-/2+  (2-18  -»  2-16), 
an  indication  of  a  lack  of  identity  of  the  individuality  differentials.  These  re- 
sults were,  on  the  whole,  confirmed  by  some  experiments  in  which  the  exam- 
ination took  place  at  a  later  date.  Thus,  in  family  13,  after  5  months  and  12 
days,  the  grade  was  2  (unfavorable  syngenesio-reaction) — after  Zy2  months, 
it  was  3.  In  family  2  (or  2N),  autogenous  conditions  were  found  in  these 
experiments. 

These  experiments  indicate  that  in  some  families  the  autogenous  condition 
was  closely  approached  but  was  not  yet  quite  attained,  while  in  other  families 
considerable  progress  had  been  made  toward  homozygosity,  but  the  grades 
corresponded  still  to  good  syngenesio-reactions.  In  different  experiments  the 
results  varied  somewhat  in  various  families.  It  is  of  special  interest  to  note 
that  the  lymphocytic  reaction  may  appear  only  at  a  late  stage  following  trans- 
plantation, but  that  the  lymphocytes  may  then  exert  a  very  destructive  effect. 
Together  with  the  late  lymphocytic  reaction  there  may  occur  a  secondary 
slight  proliferation  of  connective  tissue  in  the  transplant.  However,  the  aver- 
age grades  in  transplantations  betwen  guinea  pigs  belonging  to  different 
litters  in  these  inbred  families  were  higher  than  the  average  grades  in  trans- 
plantations between  brothers  or  sisters  in  non-inbred  families. 

(2)  Successive  transplantations  of  thyroid  into  the  same  inbred  family. 
These  gave  similar  results.  In  family  32 :  First,  transplantation  for  37  days ; 
second,  transplantation  to  brother  for  4  months,  9  days:  grade  3-/3,  which 
closely  approaches  results  in  autogenous  transplantations.  In  family  13 :  First, 
transplantation  for  31  days;  second,  transplantation  for  32  days:  grade  2, 
which  corresponds  to  a  severe  syngenesiotransplantation ;  but  in  this  case, 
donor  and  last  host  had  only  seven  generations  of  brother- sister  matings  in 
common. 

(3)  Multiple  simultaneous  transplantations.  In  four  experiments  with 
families  13  and  32,  several  pieces  either  of  thyroid  gland  alone,  or  of  thyroid 
and  various  other  organs  (spleen,  liver,  adrenal,  pancreas)  were  transplanted 
simultaneously :  examination  took  place  between  27  and  37  days.  The  grades 
varied  between  3/3—  and  3  +  ,  therefore  between  the  reactions  in  favorable 
syngenesious  and  in  autogenous  transplantations.  The  results  here  were  as  good 
in  family  13  as  in  family  32.  In  nine  additional  experiments  with  families  32, 
2  and  13,  in  which  the  examination  took  place  4  months,  9  or  12  days  after 
transplantation,  and  in  which  thyroid,  cartilage-fat  tissue,  bone  and  bone  mar- 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  GUINEA  PIGS     91 

row,  spleen,  ovary,  liver,  adrenal  gland,  testicle  and  pancreas  were  trans- 
planted, the  grades  were  as  follows :  In  two  transplantations  in  family  32,  and 
in  one  case  in  family  13,  the  grades  were  3  +  ,  corresponding  to  autogenous 
transplantations.  In  three  cases  in  family  13  and  family  32,  the  grades  were 
3—  and  3— /2+,  corresponding  to  favorable  syngenesiotransplantations,  and 
in  three  experiments  in  family  2,  the  grades  varied  between  2+  and  2,  cor- 
responding to  moderate  or  severe  syngenesio-reactions.  Liver  and  adrenal 
gland  were  not  preserved  at  this  late  period,  while  they  were  well  preserved 
after  from  27  to  37  days ;  likewise,  spleen  was  not  well  preserved.  Pancreas 
was  never  recovered.  Testicle  tubules  lined  with  Sertoli  cells  were  seen.  Again 
it  was  observed  that  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  can  occur  at  a  late  period,  and 
that  a  fully  homozygous  condition  has  not  yet  been  attained  in  the  various 
families.  In  two  additional  experiments  in  family  2,  the  donors  were  the  off- 
spring of  parents  which  represented  hybrids  between  two  different  individuals 
belonging  to  family  2.  For  two  generations  this  hybridization  had  taken  the 
place  of  the  usual  brother  and  sister  matings.  The  hosts  were  the  offspring  of 
continued  brother-sister  matings  in  family  2.  The  grades  were  2  and  2.50, 
which  correspond  to  average  grades  in  syngenesiotransplantations. 

The  average  grades  in  the  various  subdivisions  of  group  A  were  as  follows : 
2.91;  2.87;  2.56;  2.99;  2.66.  The  total  average  grade  was  2.72,  which  cor- 
responds to  a  favorable  syngenesio-reactio'n.  This  confirms  the  conclusion  that 
a  complete  identity  of  the  individuality  differentials  within  the  various  closely 
inbred  families  of  these  guinea  pigs  has  not  yet  been  reached. 

B.  Control  experiments  in  which  tissues  were  transplanted  to  non-related 
guinea  pigs.  Examination  took  place  20  to  40  days  later.  (1)  Transplanta- 
tions from  one  inbred  family  to  another  inbred  family :  The  grades  varied  be- 
tween 2-/2  and  1.  The  average  grade  was  1.27,  which  corresponds  to  a  severe 
homoiogenous  reaction.  The  most  severe  reactions  were  obtained  in  trans- 
plantations in  which  family  13  was  the  host  or  was  one  of  the  constituents  of 
a  hybrid.  (2)  Transplantations  from  non-inbred  B  to  B  stock,  or  from  hybrids 
between  inbred  families  to  B  stock  hosts:  The  average  grade  was  1.11. 
(3)  Similar  results,  with  an  average  grade  of  1.11,  were  obtained  in  trans- 
plantations from  B  stock  to  St.  Louis  stock.  In  all  these  experiments  the  grades 
were  characteristic  of  homoiogenous  transplantations. 

C.  Transplantations  between  brothers  or  sisters  in  inbred  families.  Families 
35,  32,  2  (2N)  and  13  were  used  in  these  experiments,  in  which  examination 
took  place  from  30  days  to  5%  months  after  transplantation.  In  the  trans- 
plantations in  these  various  families,  including  family  13,  the  grade  was  3  +  , 
except  in  one  case,  in  13-9,  where  it  was  3  —  ,  corresponding  to  a  favorable 
syngenesio-reaction.  The  somewhat  lower  grade  in  this  instance  was  presum- 
ably due  to  the  fact  that  here  close  inbreeding  had  not  yet  continued  long 
enough.  In  two  cases,  transplantations  between  brothers  which  were  hybrids 
of  different  generations  within  the  same  family  were  carried  out,  namely,  in 
family  13  and  in  family  32;  in  both,  the  grade  was  3  +  .  As  was  to  be  ex- 
pected, in  the  brother-to-brother  transplantations  autogenous  reactions  were 
approached  to  a  still  higher  degree  than  in  the  transplantations  between  differ- 


92  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ent  litters  of  inbred  families.  In  10  transplantations,  brothers  or  sisters  which 
were  hybrids  between  two  individuals  from  families  32,  39,  35,  13  or  2  were 
used.  In  six  of  these  transplantations  one  of  the  parents  belonged  to  family  13, 
while  the  other  parent  belonged  to  families  32,  35  or  2.  The  grades  were  3—, 
3  —  ,  3  +  ,  3,  3,  3/3  —  .  In  the  remaining  four  transplantations,  the  parents  that 
entered  into  the  hybrid  composition  belonged  to  families  39,  2,  32,  or  35 ;  the 
grades  were  3,  3  +  ,  3+,  3.  In  these  two  sets  of  transplantations,  the  average 
grades  were  2.94  and  3.12,  respectively.  While  the  difference  between  these 
two  averages  is  perhaps  too  small  to  be  of  much  significance,  both  these  grades 
are  slightly  less  favorable  than  those  obtained  in  brother-to-brother  trans- 
plantations in  the  closely  inbred  strains.  This  is  presumably  due  to  the  fact 
that  in  hybrids  a  summation  of  the  effects  of  strange  genes  takes  place,  which 
latter  may  still  be  found  in  some  individuals  in  inbred  strains. 

D.  As  controls,  transplantations  were  carried  out  between  brothers  in  non- 
inbred  stock.  In  former  experiments  of  this  kind,  the  average  grade  was  2/2— 
(1.87).  In  15  additional  experiments  in  stock  B  guinea  pigs,  the  average  grade 
was  1.91.  These  grades  are  better  than  those  obtained  in  transplantations  be- 
tween non-related,  non-inbred  guinea  pigs,  in  which  the  average  grades  were 
1.27  and  1.11,  but  they  are  much  lower  than  the  average  grades  obtained  in 
transplantations  between  brothers  in  inbred  strains. 

E.  Transplantation  front  a  hybrid  between  two  inbred  families  to  one  of 
the  parent  families.  25  experiments  were  made;  in  each  case  an  Fx  hybrid 
was  used  as  the  donor.  In  no  case  was  one  of  the  actual  parents  used  as  host, 
but  merely  the  families  to  which  the  parents  belonged.  Examination  took  place 
between  21  and  37  days  after  transplantation.  The  average  grade  was  1.75, 
which  corresponds  to  a  severe  syngenesio-reaction,  but  is  somewhat  higher 
than  the  average  grade  found  in  homoiogenous  transplantations.  Here,  again, 
it  appeared  that  the  severity  of  the  reaction  was  strongest  in  transplantations 
in  which  family  13  was  a  component  part  of  the  donor,  even  if  the  host  be- 
longed not  to  family  13,  but  to  the  other  parent  family  which  entered  into  the 
hybrid.  There  were  six  transplantations  in  which  family  13  entered  as  a  parent 
strain  in  the  donor;  in  three  of  these,  strain  13  was  likewise  the  host.  The 
other  parent  family  was  2.  The  grades  in  these  six  transplantations  were  as 
follows:  1.25,  1,  1.12,  1.25,  1,  1.25.  The  average  grade  was  1.14,  which  cor- 
responds to  a  severe  homoiogenous  reaction.  There  were  13  transplantations 
in  which  family  32  entered  into  the  hybrids,  and  in  six  of  these  it  was  also 
host.  The  grades  were  as  follows:  2.12,  2,  1.87,  1.87,  2,  2,  3.25,  1.87,  3,  1.12,  3, 
1.87,  2.75,  corresponding  to  an  average  grade  of  1.98.  The  average  grade  of  the 
experiments  in  which  strain  32  was  also  host  was  2.5.  The  other  component 
families  were  2,  35  and  39.  There  remain  six  transplantations  in  which  families 
2,  35  and  39  entered ;  here  the  average  grade  was  1.65.  There  are,  then,  at  least 
strong  indications  that  the  presence  of  family  13  in  the  hybrid  intensified  the 
reaction  against  the  graft  and  that  the  presence  of  family  32  in  the  donor,  and 
especially  also  in  the  host,  mitigated  the  severity  of  the  reaction.  It  is  not 
probable  that  the  strong  reaction  against  family  13  is  due  actually  to  a  lesser 
effect  of  the  long-continued  inbreeding,  but  to  a  greater  reactivity  of  family 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  GUINEA  PIGS     93 

13  as  a  host  and  to  an  increased  injuriousness  of  its  individuality  differentials. 
In  family  32,  the  opposite  conditions  obtain. 

F.  Transplantations  from  a  parent  family  to  a  hybrid.  Also  in  this  group 
of  experiments  the  actual  parents  of  the  hybrids  were  not  used  in  these  trans- 
plantations, but  other  members  of  the  corresponding  families.  16  experiments 
were  carried  out.  Examination  took  place  between  25  and  35  days.  The  reac- 
tions were  much  milder  in  this  series  than  in  the  reciprocal  series  E,  except  in 
one  case,  in  which  2N-52  was  transplanted  to  a  hybrid  between  families  2  and 

(2-22 
13y  (CY-0  j . "     _-.  Here,  the  grade  was  1.  Whether  in  this  instance  the  donor 

2N  happened  to  carry  some  genes  strange  to  the  family  2  component  of  the 
host,  or  whether  some  error  entered  into  this  transplantation,  is  uncertain.  The 
fact  may  be  recalled  in  this  connection  that  the  line  2N  had  not  been  propa- 
gated by  strict  brother-sister  matings.  Omitting  this  last  transplantation,  the 
average  grade  in  the  remaining  15  transplantations  was  3.05,  a  grade  similar 
to  those  obtained  in  transplantations  between  brother  hybrids  in  inbred  fami- 
lies, which  were  2.94  and  3.12.  If  we  include  the  transplantation  with  grade  1, 
the  average  grade  was  2.92.  If  we  omit  again  this  one  transplantation,  there 
were  six  of  15  experiments  in  which  the  grades  were  below  3,  namely,  2.87 
and  2.75 ;  these  grades  were  characteristic  of  a  favorable  syngenesio-reaction, 
while  in  the  other  cases  the  reaction  approached  closely  the  autogenous  state. 
Taken  as  a  whole,  the  grades  were  very  good  in  this  series  and  they  came  near 
to  those  characteristic  of  autogenous  reactions,  but  a  fully  homozygous  con- 
dition had  not  yet  been  reached. 

From  these  data,  it  may  be  concluded  that  transplantations  from  hybrids  to 
one  of  the  parent  families  did  not  elicit  homoiogenous  reactions,  but,  instead, 
severe  syngenesio-reactions.  It  seems  possible  that  in  this  case  the  presence  of 
gene  sets  common  to  donor  and  host  mitigated  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  of 
the  parent- family  serving  as  host  against  the  strange  component  of  the  hybrid- 
transplant.  On  the  other  hand,  transplantation  from  a  parent-family  to  the 
hybrid-host  did  not  give  a  perfect  autogenous  reaction,  since  some  of  the  genes 
of  the  parent  may  be  strange  to  the  corresponding  constituent  of  the  hybrid; 
therefore,  in  a  number  of  cases,  syngenesio-reactions  were  obtained.  Another 
possible  factor  affecting  the  result  in  these  experiments  was  the  apparent 
tendency  of  certain  families  to  elicit  a  more  severe  reaction,  or  to  respond 
more  aggressively  themselves  than  others;  thus  the  involvement  of  families 
13  and  35  in  the  transplantation  seemed  to  cause  a  relatively  severe,  and  that 
of  family  32  a  more  mitigated  reaction.  As  stated  previously,  there  is  some 
indication  that  the  reaction  may  be  stronger  in  the  presence  of  family  13,  be- 
cause in  this  family  the  various  members  may  have  a  smaller  number  of 
common  brother-sister  matings  than  in  some  other  families;  but  such  a  con- 
dition should  not  affect  the  severity  of  the  reaction  of  a  family  other  than  13 
serving  as  host  against  a  hybrid  containing  the  gene  set  of  family  13;  in  this 
case,  other  conditions  must  be  responsible  for  the  severe  effect. 

G.  Transplantations  between  hybrids,  in  which  donor  and  host  were  com- 
posed of  the  same  two  inbred  families  but  were  not  brothers  or  sisters.   14 


94  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

transplantations  of  this  kind  were  carried  out;  but  in  one  of  these,  the  ex- 
amination took  place  as  early  as  10  days  after  transplantation.  Omitting  this 
case,  there  remain  13  experiments  in  which  the  examination  took  place  between 
20  and  40  days.  In  the  large  majority  of  these  transplantations  the  hybrids 
were  composed  of  families  13y  and  2,  but  in  a  few  instances,  families  35  and 
32  were  parents  of  the  hybrids.  We  may  arrange  these  transplantations  accord- 
ing to  the  similarity  or  difference  in  the  generations  of  brother-sister  matings 
of  the  two  component  parents  in  donor  and  host.  In  one  set  the  parent  families, 
13y  and  2,  which  entered  into  the  hybrids  in  donor  and  host,  belonged  to  the 

same  generations:  (Cy-0  j^J'  4  -^Cy-0  jl%  (21  days)  ;  grade  3.  In  four 
transplantations,  the  generations  were  the  same  in  one  inbred  family  but  differ- 
ent in  the  other  family:  CP-0  jj^"2^  -+CP-0  H^J5  (20  days)  ;  grade  2.75. 

The  grades  in  the  other  three  transplantations  of  this  kind  were:  3,  3.25,  2.75  ; 
the  average  grade  was  2.94.  In  the  remaining  eight  experiments,  in  each  case 
the  parents  composing  the  hybrids  belonged  to  different  generations.  The 
grades  were:  1.75,  1.75,  1.75,  1.25,  1.75,  1  (hybrids  between  families  13y  and 
2),  2.75  (hybrids  between  families  2  and  35),  and  3.25  (hybrids  between 
families  32  and  35).  Again  the  presence  of  family  13  in  the  hybrids  seemed  to 
intensify  the  severity  of  the  reaction,  while  in  the  combination  between  fami- 
lies 32  and  35,  the  result  corresponded  to  that  found  after  autogenous  trans- 
plantation. The  average  grade  in  the  six  transplantations  into  which  family 
13y  entered  was  1.54,  which  approached  that  of  a  homoiogenous  transplanta- 
tion. 

H.  Transplantation  in  hybrids  in  which  one  of  the  two  parent  families 
was  the  same  in  donor  and  host,  while  the  other  parent  family  was  different. 
One  hybrid  was  composed  of  families  2  and  13y,  while  the  other  hybrid,  either 
host  or  donor,  was  composed  of  families  13y  and  35.  Three  transplantations 
were  carried  out  and  examination  took  place  after  19  to  21  days.  The  grades 
were:  1.87,  2.12,  1,  and  the  average  grade  was  1.69,  which  represents  a  mod- 
erate homoiogenous  reaction.  The  result  is  similar  to  that  obtained  in  the 
transplantations  between  hybrids  2  and  13y,  in  which  both  parent  families  be- 
longed to  different  generations. 

Series  III.  Transplantations  between  guinea  pigs  during  early  stages  in 
inbreeding. 

Two  short  series  of  experiments  were  carried  out  with  guinea  pigs  which 
had  been  inbred  for  five  to  six  generations  by  brother-sister  matings  at  the 
Caworth  Farms  in  New  York.  We  shall  briefly  mention*these  transplanta- 
tions, because  they  indicate  that  in  contrast  to  the  experiments  with  guinea 
pigs  which  had  been  subjected  to  close  inbreeding  for  from  about  15  to  27 
generations,  no  definite  progress  towards  an  autogenous  condition  of  the 
individuality  differentials  had  as  yet  been  made.  Guinea  pigs  from  two  strains 
(CP  and  Connaught),  in  each  of  which  there  were  several  inbred  families, 
were  used.  The  initial  weights  varied  between  225  and  310  grams  and 
examination  took  place  after  30  days.  Thyroid,  cartilage,  fat  tissue  and 
muscle  or  thymus  were  transplanted. 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  GUINEA  PIGS     95 

In  a  few  experiments  of  the  first  series,  in  which  brother-to-brother 
transplantations  were  carried  out,  the  grade  was  slightly  above  1 ;  likewise, 
in  transplantations  from  one  strain  to  another  the  average  grade  was  1.  In  a 
second  series  of  transplantations,  made  within  the  same  strains,  the  average 
grade  was  1.85  in  six  experiments.  In  six  other  experiments,  in  which 
transplantations  were  made  between  different  strains  from  Caworth  Farms 
guinea  pigs  to  St.  Louis  guinea  pigs,  the  average  grade  was  1.33.  We  may 
then  conclude  that  there  is  perhaps  a  slight  indication  of  a  beginning  homo- 
zygous condition  in  these  guinea  pigs,  as  indicated  by  grade  1.85  in  trans- 
plantations within  the  same  strain ;  but  in  the  first  series,  there  is  no  indication 
of  such  a  tendency.  Therefore,  after  five  or  six  generations  of  inbreeding, 
there  is  not  yet  any  definite  advance  in  the  direction  towards  a  homozygous 
state  among  these  animals. 

The  following  are  the  principal  conclusions  suggested  by  all  these  experi- 
ments with  closely  inbred  guinea  pigs.  The  difference  between  the  relatively 
rapid  effect  of  inbreeding  on  the  individuality  differentials  in  guinea  pigs  as 
compared  to  the  effect  in  rats,  which  were  studied  in  the  preceding  pages, 
is  striking.  However,  even  in  guinea  pigs  the  ultimate  goal  of  the  inbreeding, 
namely,  a  completely  autogenous  state  of  the  individuality  differentials,  of 
all  the  animals  in  an  inbred  family,  has  not  yet  been  reached.  The  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  transplant  were  the  more  similar  to  one  another  the 
larger  the  number  of  brother  and  sister  matings  which  these  individuals  had 
in  common  before  the  separation  of  these  matings  into  different  sidelines 
took  place,  and  the  smaller  the  number  of  these  separate  and  distinct  brother- 
sister  matings  had  been  in  the  preceding  generation  in  host  and  donor.  The 
separation  into  side  lines  may  cause  an  accumulation  of  unlike  genes  if  a 
perfect  homozygous  condition  had  not  yet  existed  at  the  time  of  the  separa- 
tion; mutations  may  then  add  to  the  number  of  unlike  genes.  In  family  2, 
for  instance,  the  grade  was  2.50  in  a  case  in  which  there  had  been  six  to 
nine  common  ancestral  matings,  followed  by  20  to  24  separate  brother-sister 
matings,  while  the  grade  was  3.25  with  12  and  16  brother-sister  matings 
in  common  and  subsequent  separation  for  only  two  or  three  generations. 
Similar  results  were  obtained  in  family  13.  After  19  to  20  consecutive  brother- 
sister  matings,  there  was  usually  an  absence  of  any  marked  incompatibility 
between  the  individuality  differentials.  Such  individuals  may  behave  like 
identical  twins,  at  least  within  the  range  of  conditions  which  were  used  in 
these  tests ;  however,  a  lengthening  of  the  time  during  which  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  transplant  had  a  chance  to  act  on  each  other  might 
still  have  brought  out  a  certain  difference  when  a  shorter  period  did  not  show 
it,  and  some  of  our  experiences  indicate  such  an  effect.  Striking  also  is  the 
correspondence  between  the  pedigree  relationship  of  the  various  guinea  pigs 
and  the  degree  of  relationship  of  their  individuality  differentials  as  revealed 
by  transplantation ;  this  comes  out  especially  in  the  brother-to-brother  trans- 
plantations and  in  the  various  types  of  hybrid  transplantations.  It  is  inter- 
esting in  this  connection  that  in  the  experiments  with  inbred  guinea  pigs,  as 
well  as  in  those  with  inbred  rats,  the  greater  similarity  of  the  individuality 


96  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

differentials  in  brothers  and  sisters,  as  compared  to  non-litter  mates,  was 
very  definite,  in  contrast  to  experiments  in  non-inbred  animals,  where  these 
differences  between  syngenesio-  and  homoiotransplantations  are  not  always 
definite.  The  correspondence  between  these  two  variables,  pedigrees  and 
individuality  differentials  is,  on  the  whole,  very  close,  and  this  is  one  reason 
why  we  thought  it  worth  while  to  give  some  of  the  results  obtained  in  these 
transplantations  with  greater  detail.  Of  further  interest  is  the  great  difference 
between  the  results  of  hybrid-to-parent  and  the  reciprocal  transplantations. 
The  former  are  not,  however,  identical  with  homoiogenous  transplantations, 
nor  the  latter  with  autogenous  ones;  but  in  both  intermediate  results  were 
obtained,  suggesting  that  the  presence  in  the  hybrid  of  a  gene  set  similar 
to  that  in  the  host  may  have,  beneficial  effects,  while  the  presence  of  unlike 
factors  in  the  host  may  intensify  unfavorable  reactions  against  the  transplant. 

It  is  conceivable  that  the  presence  in  the  host  of  a  set  of  genes  not  present 
in  the  donor  might  lead  to  differences  between  the  metabolism  of  host  and 
transplant  and  that  this  might,  to  some  degree,  influence  the  aggressive 
action  of  the  host  against  the  transplant.  However,  the  intensity  of  the 
reaction  in  these  transplantations  depends  essentially  upon  the  presence  in 
the  donor  of  genetic  factors  not  present  in  the  host.  In  tumor  transplantations, 
Little  and  Tyzzer  (1916)  found  that  in  transplantations  from  hybrids  to 
parent  strain,  no  successful  transplantations  were  obtained,  while  the 
reciprocal  transplantations  gave  100  per  cent  takes ;  they  concluded  that  only 
one  dose  of  genes  is  required  for  successful  transplantations.  Subsequently 
(1921/22),  Little  and  Johnson  noted  that  if  pieces  of  spleen  were  trans- 
planted from  inbred  Japanese  mice  to  hybrids  between  the  Japanese  and 
white  mice,  the  results  corresponded  to  those  of  autotransplantation,  while 
in  reciprocal  transplantations  from  hybrids  to  waltzing  mice,  the  transplants 
were  destroyed  in  a  short  time,  indicating  a  strong  homoio-reaction.  Similar 
results  were  published  more  recently  by  Little  and  Bittner.  But  in  these 
experiments,  conditions  were  selected  which  made  the  recognition  of  inter- 
mediate results  very  difficult.  This  caused  a  lack  of  the  finer  means  of  measur- 
ing existing  differences  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  donor  and 
host,  and  led  to  the  assumption  of  a  genetic  identity  in  one  type  of  transplanta- 
tion, and  of  a  complete  lack  of  similarity  of  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  donor  in  the  reciprocal  type,  whereas,  in  all  probability,  various 
kinds  of  intermediate  states  existed. 

And,  lastly,  there  are  at  least  indications  that  there  exist  constitutional 
inherited  differences  between  some  of  the  inbred  families,  which  determine 
not  only  differences  in  the  intensity  of  their  reactions  against  strange  indi- 
viduality differentials  in  the  transplant,  but  which  also  may  perhaps  influence 
the  degree  of  toxic  action  which  the  transplant  exerts  on  various  hosts.  While 
differences  in  the  interaction  between  hosts  and  transplants  in  different 
experiments  may  be  partly  explainable  on  the  basis  of  differences  in  the 
number  of  generations  which  have  passed  since  the  ancestries  of  two  indi- 
viduals, belonging  to  the  same  family,  branched  off  from  each  other,  it  is 
not  probable  that  this  is  the  only  factor  determining  the  differences  observed 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  GUINEA  PIGS     97 

in  the  intensity  of  reactions  of  hosts  against  transplants.  Although,  as  stated, 
it  is  much  easier  to  bring  about  a  great  similarity  in  the  constitution  of  the 
individuality  differentials  through  continued  close  inbreeding  of  certain 
families  in  guinea  pigs  than  in  rats,  we  have  seen  that  even  in  guinea  pigs, 
after  a  considerable  number  of  generations  of  brother-sister  matings,  a  com- 
plete identity  of  the  individuality  differentials  has  not  yet  been  reached.  In 
accordance  with  this  fact  is  the  observation  that,  a  small  number  of  genera- 
tions of  brother-sister  matings  does  not  seem  to  cause  a  marked  increase 
in  the  similarity  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  guinea  pigs,  as  shown 
in  series  III  of  these  experiments. 


Chapter  p 

Individuality  Differentials  in  Closely 
Inbred  Strains  of  Mice 

We  have  already  discussed  the  transplantations  of  tissues  from  one 
closely  inbred  strain  of  mice  to  another,  as  well  as  some  trans- 
plantations in  non-inbred  mice,  and  we  shall  later  analyze  also 
heterogenous  transplantations  between  mice  and  some  other  species  of  ani- 
mals. We  shall  now  consider  the  transplantations  within  inbred  strains — 
intra-strain  transplantations — the  character  of  the  individuality  differentials 
of  mice  belonging  to  such  strains,  and  the  effects  of  hybridization  between 
different  inbred  strains  on  the  character  of  the  individuality  differentials  of 
the  hybrids. 

From  among  the  large  number  of  these  types  of  transplantation  carried 
out,  we  shall  first  select  a  smaller  representative  group,  in  which,  to  a  large 
extent,  some  of  the  complicating  factors,  as  indicated  by  the  presence  of 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  transplants,  have  been  avoided.  We  shall 
then  analyze  the  results  of  other  groups  of  intra-strain  transplantations,  as 
well  as  transplantations  between  hybrids,  and  some  experiments  in  which 
the  analysis  of  the  complicating  factors  mentioned,  as  well  as  of  some  addi- 
tional ones,  has  been  attempted. 

In  inter-strain  transplantations  between  strains  C57  and  D,  which  we  have 
already  discussed,  the  average  grade  of  ten  transplantations  was  1.29.  This 
corresponds  to  a  homoiogenous  relationship  of  the  individuality  differentials. 
In  ten  transplantations  between  not  closely  related  mice  belonging  to  the 
same  inbred  strains  C57  or  D,  the  average  grade  was  2.26,  which  corresponds 
to  syngenesiotransplantation.  The  grades  varied  between  2  and  3.12,  but 
in  one  case  the  grade  was  as  low  as  1.75.  In  four  transplantations  within 
inbred  strain  A,  the  average  grade  was  somewhat  higher,  namely,  2.81.  In 
two  New  Buffalo  mice  the  average  grade  was  2.  These  grades  varied  between 
those  characteristic  of  favorable  and  of  average  syngenesiotransplantations.  In 
eight  transplantations  between  hybrids  (DxC57)F1(  belonging  to  different 
litters,  the  average  grade  was  1.91,  which,  in  accordance  with  expectation, 
is  below  the  grades  obtained  in  grafts  between  members  of  inbred  strains. 
In  11  transplantations  between  hybrids  (DxC57)F1;  which  were  brothers, 
the  average  grade  was  much  higher,  namely  3.04,  a  result  which  approaches 
that  found  in  autogenous  conditions.  In  21  transplantations  from  parents 
D  or  C57  to  their  hybrid  children  (C57xD)F1,  the  average  grade  was 
2.60,  which  corresponds  to  a  favorable  syngenesio-reaction.  In  case  members 
of  the  strains  to  which  the  parents  belonged,  but  not  the  parents  them- 
selves were  the  donors,  the  average  grade  in  six  transplantations  was 
2.35,  which  is  slightly  less  favorable  than  the  transplantations  from  the 

98 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  99 

direct  parents  to  the  hybrids,  although  it  still  falls  into  the  range  of  nearly 
related  individuality  differentials.  Decidedly  more  unfavorable  were  trans- 
plantations from  hybrids  (C57xD)Fj  to  their  own  parents,  with  an  average 
grade  of  1.42  in  ten  transplantations,  or  from  such  hybrids  to  members  of 
their  parent  strains,  other  than  their  actual  parents,  with  an  average  grade 
of  1.50  in  five  transplantations.  Both  of  these  reactions  fall  into  the  range 
of  homoiogenous  relationship  of  the  individuality  differentials.  In  all  these 
experiments  examination  as  a  rule  took  place  20  days  following  trans- 
plantation, and  each  mouse  received  transplants  of  thyroid,  cartilage,  fat 
tissue  and  striated  muscle ;  whenever  possible,  also  ovaries  were  trans- 
planted. These  grades  indicate  very  strongly  that  neither  in  strains  C57,  D, 
New  Buffalo,  nor  even  in  strain  A,  has  an  autogenous  condition  of  the 
individuality  differentials  been  reached ;  but  it  has  progressed  farthest  in 
this  direction  in  strain  A.  All  these  grades  fall  into  the  range  of  syn- 
genesiotransplantation.  However,  the  reactions  are  much  milder  in  intra- 
strain  than  in  inter-strain  transplantations,  where  they  correspond  to 
homoiogenous  transplantations.  In  accordance  with  expectation,  the  reactions 
were  more  severe  if  instead  of  transplanting  within  the  same  inbred  strain, 
we  transplanted  between  hybrids  such  as  DxC57)F1,  in  which  both  parents 
were  from  inbred  strains.  In  this  case  the  results  were  intermediate  be- 
tween those  obtained  in  simple  inter-strain  and  intrastrain  transplantations, 
corresponding  to  unfavorable  types  of  syngenesiotransplantation.  How- 
ever, if  the  hybrids  which  served  as  donors  and  hosts  were  brothers  and 
sisters,  then  the  results  approached  more  closely  those  obtained  in  autog- 
enous transplantations.  As  was  to  be  anticipated,  in  transplantations  from 
parent  strains  to  hybrids  the  grades  were  higher  than  in  the  reciprocal 
transplantations.  In  the  former,  they  corresponded  about  to  the  grades  of 
simple  intra-strain  transplantations,  although  they  were  slightly  better 
than  the  latter  if  the  actual  parents  of  the  hybrids  served  as  donors ;  how- 
ever, an  autogenous  condition  had  not  yet  been  reached.  The  reciprocal 
transplantations  from  hybrids  to  parent  strains  or  to  the  actual  parents 
gave  results  which  were  only  slightly  better  than  those  obtained  in  inter- 
strain   transplantations. 

As  stated  on  previous  occasions,  in  the  mouse  the  main  reliance  in  the 
grading  must  be  placed  on  the  state  of  preservation  of  the  various  tissues,  on 
the  kind  of  structures  which  survive,  and  on  the  extent  of  the  ingrowth  of 
connective  tissue  into  the  various  transplants  and  the  degree  of  replacement 
of  the  latter  by  fibrous  tissue.  In  the  case  of  the  fat  tissue,  also  the  number  of 
epithelioid  phagocytic  cells  which  separate  the  fat  cells  is  significant.  While 
lymphocytic  infiltration  plays  a  certain  role  likewise  in  the  mouse,  and  while 
it  may  be  very  intense  in  some  instances,  it  can  not  be  relied  upon  as  a  quanti- 
tative standard  in  the  evaluation  of  the  reactions  to  the  same  extent  as  in  rat 
and  guinea  pig;  but  in  the  mouse,  also,  there  is  a  very  good  correspondence 
beween  the  fate  of  various  kinds  of  tissues  transplanted  from  the  same  donor 
into  the  same  host,  if  we  make  allowance  for  peculiarities  of  different  types 
of  tissues  and  for  accidental  variable  factors  which  may  complicate  the  results. 


100  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

A  comparison  of  the  results  of  transplantations  within  various  inbred 
strains.  In  a  further  extensive  series  of  experiments  we  have  compared, 
in  a  number  of  closely  inbred  strains,  the  reactions  against  transplants,  when 
donors  and  hosts  belonged  to  the  same  inbred  strain.  (1)  In  strain  A,  pieces 
were  examined  from  12  to  50  days  after  transplantation ;  the  age  of  the  hosts 
and  donors  varied,  as  a  rule,  between  2  months  and  7  months,  but  in  some 
transplantations  the  hosts  were  as  old  as  16  months.  These  differences  in  age 
did  not  affect  noticeably  the  results  of  transplantation.  In  the  large  majority 
of  cases  the  transplants  (thyroid,  parathyroid,  cartilage,  fat  tissue,  bone  and 
bone  marrow,  and  striated  muscle  tissue)  behaved  like  autogenous  transplants, 
or  they  at  least  approached  this  condition.  But  in  certain  instances  the  thyroid 
graft  was  stunted  or  there  were  some  mild  lymphocytic  infiltrations  in  the 
thyroid,  muscle  or  cartilage-fat  transplants.  These  changes  were  found  as 
early  as  20  days  after  transplantation  and  also  after  50  days ;  but  when  pres- 
ent, they  were  mild  and  they  corresponded  to  favorable  syngenesio-reactions. 
There  was  a  marked  similarity  in  the  condition  of  the  various  tissues  trans- 
planted from  the  same  donor  into  the  same  host — they  all  showed  the  struc- 
ture of  autogenous  transplants — although,  as  stated,  there  could  develop  a  mild 
lymphocytic  infiltration  in  some  instances.  More  severe  reactions  were  noted 
in  experiments  in  which  the  presence  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  which 
accumulated  especially  inside  of  fibrous  nodules,  indicated  a  probable  infec- 
tion. At  some  distance  from  the  center  of  infection  an  increase  in  lymphocytes 
in  the  fat  tissue  and  infiltrations  with  small  vacuolated  phagocytic  cells  could 
be  noted;  but  even  under  such  conditions  the  injurious  changes,  including 
formation  of  fibrous  tissue,  as  a  rule  were  mostly  localized  and  did  not  lead  to 
a  general  damage  of  the  transplants.  In  the  majority  of  these,  as  well  as  of  the 
following  transplantations,  examination  took  place  after  20  or  30  days,  but  in 
some  cases  it  was  as  late  as  50  days,  as  it  was  also  in  other  strains  than  A. 

In  strain  C3H,  the  results  were  similar  to  those  found  in  strain  A ;  in  the 
majority  of  cases  the  pieces  behaved  like  autogenous  transplants;  however, 
there  were  occasionally  some  slight  lymphocytic  infiltrations,  and  if  an  infec- 
tion had  occurred,  the  reactions  were  more  severe. 

In  strain  D,  a  great  variability  of  the  reactions  was  noted;  these  ranged 
from  an  autogenous  to  a  severe  homoiogenous  type,  in  which  a  great  part  of 
the  thyroid  was  destroyed  and  the  remaining  acini  were  embedded  in  fibrous 
tissue.  There  was  also  some  lymphocytic  infiltration;  in  the  fat  tissue  an  in- 
crease in  fibrous  tissue  had  taken  place,  and  epithelioid,  small  vacuolated 
phagocytic  cells,  together  with  some  accumulations  of  lymphocytes,  were  pres- 
ent. In  general,  there  was  a  correspondence  between  the  behavior  of  different 
tissues  taken  from  one  donor  and  transplanted  into  the  same  host.  In  an  ex- 
periment in  which  four  pieces  of  thyroid  had  been  transplanted  from  two 
donors  into  the  same  host,  two  of  the  transplants  behaved  like  autogenous, 
and  the  other  two  like  homoiogenous  transplants.  Strain  D  is  then,  it  seems, 
less  homozygous  than  strains  A  and  C3H. 

In  strain  CBA  the  results  corresponded  mostly  to  those  found  in  autog- 
enous transplantations ;  but  in  some  instances  there  was  an  increase  in  fibrous 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  101 

tissue  and  lymphocytes,  a  destruction  of  a  part  of  the  thyroid  transplant,  and 
an  infiltration  of  the  fat  tissue  by  connective  tissue,  lymphocytes  and  small 
vacuolated  phagocytic  cells.  However,  the  more  severe  reactions  may  have 
been  due  to  infection,  as  indicated  by  the  presence  of  polymorphonuclear  leu- 
cocytes in  or  around  the  transplants. 

In  strain  C57  we  find,  again,  reactions  varying  between  those  seen  in  auto- 
genous and  those  in  homoiogenous  transplantation.  Besides  the  many  experi- 
ments in  which  the  results  resembled  or  approached  those  obtained  in  autog- 
enous transplantations,  there  were  a  considerable  number  of  syngenesio-  and 
homoiogenous  reactions  and,  as  a  rule,  a  correspondence  existed  between  the 
behavior  of  different  transplanted  tissues.  In  some  instances,  the  presence 
of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  made  the  interpretation  of  the  results  difficult. 

In  New  Buffalo  strain,  in  which  donors  and  hosts  were  from  2  to  6  months 
old,  either  almost  autogenous  reactions  or  syngenesio-reactions  were  obtained ; 
in  some  instances,  a  stunting  of  transplanted  thyroids  and  striated  muscle 
tissue  was  noted.  The  average  grades  were  2.84  in  transplantations  between 
litter  mates  and  2.81  in  those  between  non-litter  mates,  a  difference  which  is 
of  no  significance.  In  a  few  older  mice  belonging  to  strain  Old  Buffalo,  a  few 
homoiogenous  reactions  were  noted.  There  was,  as  a  rule,  a  correspondence 
in  the  type  of  reactions  against  different  tissues  in  transplantations  from  the 
same  donor  to  the  same  host.  On  the  whole,  then,  the  individuality  differen- 
tials in  strain  New  Buffalo  approached  identity,  but  this  goal  had  not  yet  been 
quite  reached. 

In  strain  AKA,  there  was  usually  a  definite  homoiogenous  reaction  against 
thyroid  as  well  as  against  cartilage  and  fat  tissue.  In  some  cases  the  thyroid 
was  destroyed,  in  others  there  was  an  incomplete  ring  of  acini  invaded  by 
fibrous  tissue  and  with  much  lymphocytic  infiltration,  which  helped  to  destroy 
the  acini.  In  such  cases  the  fat  tissue  was  usually  invaded  by  fibrous  tissue, 
lymphocytes  and  phagocytic,  vacuolated  cells ;  the  bone  marrow  was  necrotic. 
In  one  instance,  the  thyroid  transplant  approached  an  autogenous  condition, 
and,  correspondingly,  there  was  very  little  connective  tissue  ingrowth  or 
lymphocytic  infiltration  in  the  fat  tissue.  In  a  few  other  cases  there  were 
syngenesio-reactions ;  but  for  the  most  part,  a  marked  homoiogenous  reaction 
was  found. 

In  strain  C  only  a  few  transplantations  were  carried  out ;  the  results  were 
good,  approaching  autogenous  or  syngenesious  conditions. 

Do  variations  in  age  of  donors  or  hosts  in  inbred  strains  affect  the  reactions 
against  the  individuality  differentials?  In  further  experiments  we  tested  the 
degree  to  which  the  individuality  differentials,  within  the  various  inbred 
strains,  had  become  similar  to  one  another  or  identical,  by  transplanting  tissues 
from  relatively  old  donors  to  young  hosts  and  vice  versa.  This  procedure  gave 
us  also  an  opportunity  to  study  further  the  effect  of  the  age  of  donors  and 
hosts  on  the  reactions  against  individuality  differentials,  in  experiments  which 
can  be  more  readily  carried  out  in  mice  than  in  other  species,  because  mice 
undergo  old  age  changes  and  die  earlier  than  do  most  other  mammalian  species 
used  in  these  experiments. 


102  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Strain  A.  In  experiments  in  which  the  donors  were  from  14  to  19  months 
old  and  the  hosts  were  young,  the  transplanted  thyroid  was  found  more  or  less 
sclerosed,  which  means  that  the  individual  acini  were  surrounded  and  sep- 
arated from  one  another  by  hyaline-fibrous  tissue.  However,  in  strain  A,  begin- 
ning soon  after  the  age  of  12  months,  the  thyroid  normally  undergoes  sclero- 
sis, although  not  so  frequently  as  in  strain  C57.  The  parathyroid  showed  cor- 
responding pericapillary  hyalinization.  It  follows  that  these  local  tissue  changes 
cannot  be  reversed  by  transplantation  into  young  hosts,  where  the  constitu- 
tion of  the  bodyfluids  differs  in  certain  respects  from  that  in  older  animals. 
While  in  certain  cases  some  of  these  transplants  behaved  like  autogenous 
tissues,  in  some  others  the  transplants  were  invaded  by  lymphocytes,  slightly 
or  even  more  extensively.  The  lymphocytic  infiltration  became  greater,  espe- 
cially around  the  grafts  which  had  been  kept  in  the  host  for  longer  periods. 
This  observation  seems  to  confirm  the  conclusion  that  even  in  strain  A  the 
individuality  differentials  of  different  animals  have  not  yet  become  identical. 
But,  as  we  have  found  in  other  cases,  here  also  local  factors  may  co-operate 
with  the  effects  of  a  certain  degree  of  incompatibility  between  the  individuality 
differentials  in  calling  forth  lymphocytic  infiltration ;  thus  we  noticed  in  one 
instance  in  which  two  thyroids  from  the  same  donor  were  transplanted  into 
the  same  host,  one  showed  some  lymphocytic  infiltration  while  the  other  one 
was  as  yet  free  from  it.  Such  a  result  may  have  meant  merely  that  in  one  graft 
the  threshold  of  stimulation  for  the  host  lymphocytes  was  reached  somewhat 
earlier  than  in  the  other  one.  In  reciprocal  experiments,  tissues  (thyroid, 
cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  striated  muscle)  were  transplanted  from  2  or  2y2 
months  old  mice  to  18  or  19^  months  old  hosts.  Here,  all  the  tissues  were 
well  preserved ;  the  transplants  behaved  on  the  whole  like  autogenous  grafts ; 
it  is  possible  that  the  amount  of  preserved  thyroid  or  muscle  tissue  was  some- 
what reduced,  although  this  does  not  seem  to  be  a  necessary  result  of  the  old 
age  of  the  hosts.  There  was  no  sclerosis  and  no  lymphocytic  infiltration  in  the 
old  hosts. 

We  compared  with  these  intra-strain  transplantations,  inter-strain  trans- 
plantations of  the  same  kinds  of  tissues,  in  which  both  host  and  donor  were 
about  4  to  5  months  old.  Here  the  reactions  were  much  more  severe.  In  some 
cases  the  thyroid  transplant  had  been  entirely  replaced  by  fibrous  tissue  and 
lymphocytes,  in  others,  more  or  less  tissue  had  been  destroyed.  The  average 
grades  in  these  inter-strain  transplantations  were:  Strain  A  to  strain  New 
Buffalo— 1.06;  strain  New  Buffalo  to  strain  A— 1.90. 

In  strain  D,  in  transplantations  from  young  \y2  to  2y2  months  old  mice,  to 
mice  ranging  in  age  between  12  and  19  months,  the  grades  varied  between  3, 
approaching  grades  given  in  autogenous  transplantations,  and  1+  ;  usually 
there  was  a  partial  fibrosis,  due  to  increase  of  connective  tissue  between  acini 
and  imperfect  preservation  of  the  transplants.  In  transplantations  from  12 
months  old  donors  to  2  months  old  hosts  the  results  were  good,  the  grades 
being  mostly  3  and  3  —  .  In  transplantations  in  which  hosts  and  donors  were 
about  7  months  old,  the  results  were  intermediate,  lymphocytes  invaded  thyroid 
and  muscle  and  there  were  vacuolated  phagocytic  cells  in  the  fat  tissue.  In 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  103 

transplantations  between  2  months  old  mice,  the  results  approached  those 
found  in  autogenous  reactions.  These  experiments  confirm,  then,  our  previous 
findings,  which  indicated  great  variations  in  the  transplantations  in  this  strain 
and  the  occurrence  of  autogenous  as  well  as  of  homoiogenous  reactions.  We 
noted  furthermore  that  transplants  into  hosts  as  old  as  18  months  may  remain 
very  well  preserved,  but  in  general  the  results  were  better  in  experiments  in 
which  host  and  donor  were  young  than  in  those  in  which  they  were  older. 

In  strain  C57,  almost  all  mice  older  than  12  months  are  affected  to  a  variable 
extent  with  sclerosis  of  the  thyroid  gland.  If  the  various  organ  pieces,  includ- 
ing thyroid  gland,  of  mice  ranging  in  age  between  \Sl/2  and  18  months,  were 
transplanted  into  young,  2  to  3  months  old  mice,  the  preservation  of  the  grafts 
was,  on  the  whole,  very  good ;  but  in  one-half  of  the  transplanted  thyroids 
sclerosis  was  found,  and  in  five  out  of  six  of  these  pieces  there  was  much  or 
moderate  lymphocytic  infiltration.  Therefore,  the  sclerosis  of  the  thyroid, 
which  develops  in  older  mice  of  this  strain,  may  remain  unchanged  in  young 
hosts. 

In  strain  C3H,  tissues  were  transplanted  from  13  to  13^  months  old  mice 
to  35^2  to  4  months  old  animals.  The  results  approached  those  of  autogenous 
transplantations  and  only  rarely  a  slight  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  found. 
As  controls,  transplantations  were  made  from  strain  C3H  to  strain  C57.  The 
donors  ranged  in  age  from  15  months  and  13  days  to  13  months  and  20  days; 
the  hosts'  age  ranged  from  almost  3  to  4  months.  The  average  grade  was  1.37, 
which  corresponds  to  a  marked  homoiogenous  reaction.  In  one  instance  the 
thyroid  was  partly  sclerosed.  The  relatively  old  age  of  the  donor  did  not 
modify  noticeably  the  strength  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  trans- 
plants, and  the  marked  difference  between  the  severity  of  the  reaction  after 
transplantation  of  tissues  into  different  strains  and  into  the  same  strain  is 
quite  evident. 

In  one  experiment,  four  thyroid  glands  were  transplanted  from  two  \]/2 
months  old  CBA  mice  to  a  19  months  old  CBA  mouse.  Two  months  later,  at 
autopsy,  two  thyroids  were  found.  There  was  no  lymphocytic  infiltration  and 
the  thyroid  tissue  was  well  preserved,  but  a  small  amount  of  hyaline  tissue  had 
developed  around  certain  acini.  Also,  in  the  parathyroid  hyaline  septa  were 
noted.  This  observation  agrees  with  that  made  in  some  other  instances  in 
which  thyroid  glands  were  transplanted  from  young  into  old  mice.  We  are 
inclined  to  interpret  this  condition  as  a  partial  sclerosis  of  the  thyroid  gland. 
It  seems,  then,  that  after  transplantation  of  the  thyroid  gland  from  young  into 
old  mice  of  the  same  strain  there  may  be,  in  some  cases,  relatively  much  de- 
velopment of  dense  fibrous-hyaline  connective  tissue  around  certain  acini. 
The  conditions  usually  present  in  the  old  hosts  would  favor  sclerotic  changes 
in  the  thyroid  tissue,  and  if  this  tendency  is  sufficiently  strong,  it  may  lead  to 
sclerosis  even  in  the  non-transplanted  thyroid  gland  of  the  host;  otherwise, 
there  was  no  indication  of  a  specific  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  individu- 
ality differential  of  the  transplant,  and  in  some  transplantations  into  old  mice 
the  results  may  approach  those  found  in  autogenous  grafts. 

These  experiments  confirm,  therefore,  our  former  ones,  in  which  it  has  been 


104  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

shown  that  there  are  still  disharmonies  between  the  individuality  differentials 
of  mice  within  the  same  inbred  strains,  but  that  the  frequency  with  which  the 
resulting  antagonism  is  found  varies  in  different  strains.  They  show  also  that, 
essentially,  old  hosts  react  against  transplants  in  a  similar  manner  to  young 
hosts,  except  that  there  may  possibly  be  a  greater  tendency  in  the  old  hosts  to 
the  development  of  fibrosis  around  the  transplanted  thyroid  acini ;  but  in  ex- 
periments in  strain  A,  similar  results  were  obtained  in  transplantations  in 
which  the  age  of  donors  and  hosts,  brothers  and  sisters  in  these  cases,  was 
1  or  2  months  and  in  others  in  which  it  was  11  months.  In  addition,  these 
experiments  show  that  if  a  sclerosed  thyroid  is  transplanted  to  a  young  mouse 
belonging  to  the  same  strain,  the  sclerosis  may  persist  and  that  such  a  sclerosed 
thyroid  may  also  be  invaded  by  lymphocytes. 

Serial  transplantation  of  thyroid  gland  in  inbred  strain  A.  From  long- 
continued  transplantations  of  tumors,  we  concluded  that  various  mammalian 
tissues  have  the  potentiality  to  immortal  life,  although  the  organism  of  which 
they  form  a  part  is  mortal.  It  is  not  possible  to  repeat  this  condition  with 
normal  tissues  through  serial  transplantations  in  the  same  way  as  with  tumors, 
because  in  the  case  of  normal  tissues  the  differences  between  the  individuality 
differentials  of  donor  and  host  will,  in  all  probability,  be  so  great  that  the 
toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  and  the  aggressive  action  of  its  lympho- 
cytes and  connective  tissue  will  injure  and  destroy  the  transplants  within  a 
relatively  short  time.  On  a  former  occasion  we  attempted  to  overcome  this 
difficulty  by  using  for  serial  transplantations  in  the  rat  a  very  resistant  tissue, 
namely  cartilage,  and  in  this  way  it  could  be  shown  that  parts  of  the  cartilage, 
originally  taken  from  an  old  rat,  after  transplantation  into  younger  hosts  may 
remain  alive  for  so  long  a  time  that  the  total  age  of  the  transplant  exceeds  that 
usually  reached  by  rats. 

Subsequently  it  occurred  to  us  that  this  problem  might  perhaps  be  attacked 
successfully  in  still  another  manner,  namely,  by  serial  transplantation  in  close- 
ly inbred  strains  or  families,  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  in  all  the 
animals  belonging  to  such  a  strain  or  famly  had  become  identical  or  almost 
identical.  Here,  the  reactions  against  the  transplants  on  the  part  of  the  hosts 
should  be  lacking,  or  so  slight  that  no  serious  damage  would  be  inflicted.  We 
have  already  reported  on  short  serial  transplantations  of  this  kind  in  guinea 
pigs,  but  more  favorable  for  this  purpose  seemed  to  be  the  inbred  strain  A 
mice,  because  under  natural  conditions  the  life  of  this  mouse  is  shorter  than 
that  of  a  rat  or  guinea  pig  and  because  strain  A  was  the  one  in  which  severe 
reactions  against  transplants  from  donors  belonging  to  strain  A  would  be  least 
likely  to  occur.  We  selected  for  transplantation,  the  thyroid  gland,  with  or 
without  the  parathyroid.  In  this  case,  not  only  isolated  tissues,  such  as  fibro- 
blasts or  epidermal  cells  spreading  out  diffusely,  but  a  complete  organ  would 
be  kept  alive. 

Ten  experiments  were  carried  out,  in  which  one  or  two  thyroid  glands  were 
transplanted  from  a  strain  A  mouse  through  a  number  of  generations  of  A 
mice,  the  donors  in  different  experiments  varying  in  age  between  Sy2  months 
and  14  months.  Three  of  the  donors  had  reached  the  age  of  14  months,  one  the 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  105 

age  of  13  months,  and  two  the  age  of  12  months  at  the  time  the  experiment 
was  started.  The  serial  transplantations  were  continued  for  periods  that  varied 
between  5^2  months  and  34^  months.  The  youngest  thyroid  recovered  after 
completion  of  the  serial  transplantation  was  11  months  and  10  days  old  and 
the  oldest  one  was  41^  months  old;  the  age  of  the  others  was  intermediate 
between  these  ages.  The  age  of  41^2  months  exceeds  considerably  the  average 
age  of  A  mice  and  exceeds,  probably,  also  the  oldest  age  which  mice  belonging 
to  this  strain  reach.  The  number  of  serial  transplantations  made  in  these  vari- 
ous experiments  ranged  between  three  and  seven,  and  the  time  during  which  a 
transplant  remained  in  a  single  host  varied  between  2j^  months  and  6  months  ; 
but  in  several  instances  the  transplant  was  left  only  2^2  weeks  in  the  last  host. 
On  microscopic  examination  it  was  found  that  the  thyroid  was  preserved,  but 
in  four  experiments  it  showed  either  slight  or  partial  sclerosis,  while  in  six 
experiments  it  showed  complete  sclerosis.  In  the  latter  case,  all  the  acini  were 
surrounded  by  rings  of  hyaline-fibrous  tissue,  which  separated  the  acini  from 
one  another.  In  the  center,  a  number  of  acini  had  been  reduced  to  thin  cell 
strands  or  had  been  lost  entirely  through  pressure  of  the  stroma,  which  injured 
the  epithelium,  and,  in  addition,  interfered  with  its  nourishment.  Several 
capillaries  were  seen,  however,  in  the  stroma.  These  thyroid  transplants,  there- 
fore, resembled  closely  the  non-transplanted  thyroids  of  older  mice  belonging 
to  strain  C57.  In  four  cases  a  limited  number  of  acini  were  surrounded  by 
thin  hyaline  rings ;  but  over  larger  areas  the  acini  were  lying  close  together. 
Lymphocytic  infiltration  was  either  lacking  entirely,  or  it  was  slight.  Probably 
two  factors  are  involved  in  the  development  of  this  sclerotic  condition:  (1) 
The  age  of  the  donor.  An  age  of  the  donor  above  13  months  favors  complete 
sclerosis.  There  was  no  sclerosis  when  the  transplant  was  less  than  12  months 
old.  (2)  The  length  of  time  during  which  the  transplant  remained  in  the 
strange  hosts.  Complete  sclerosis  was  found  in  cases  in  which  the  donor  was 
only  6  or  12  months  old ;  here  there  is  little  doubt  that  the  thyroid  at  the  time 
of  transplantation  was  not  yet  sclerotic,  but  that  it  acquired  the  sclerosis  in 
the  course  of  the  serial  transplantations.  Therefore,  if  the  transplanted  thyroid 
remained  long  enough  in  different  hosts,  or  if  it  attained  a  certain  age,  it 
tended  to  become  completely  sclerotic.  This  condition  was  especially  marked 
if  the  donor  of  the  thyroid  had  reached  the  age  of  14  months,  in  which  event 
the  transplant  either  was  already  somewhat  sclerotic  or  had  a  greater  tendency 
to  become  so.  This  interpretation  agrees  with  our  findings  in  the  preceding 
experiments,  where  there  were  likewise  indications  that  both  the  factors  men- 
tioned here  may  play  a  role  in  producing  thyroid  sclerosis. 

It  follows  from  these  experiments  that  by  means  of  serial  transplantations 
in  the  same  inbred  strains,  it  will  in  all  probability  be  possible  to  keep  whole 
organs  alive  up  to  an  age  which  much  exceeds  that  usually  attained  under 
normal  conditions,  and  that  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  such  transplants 
may  be  lacking  entirely.  It  may  perhaps  be  possible  even  to  keep  such  trans- 
plants alive  indefinitely  by  serial  transplantation.  However,  it  may  be  suggested 
that  in  future  experiments  of  this. kind,  the  transplant  be  allowed  to  remain  for 
longer  periods  of  time  in  the  same  host  and  that,  correspondingly,  the  number 


106  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  repeated  retransplantations  be  diminished;  this  may  perhaps  lead  to  a 
diminution  of  the  injury  inflicted  on  the  grafted  tissue. 

It  is  very  probable  that  a  sclerosed  thyroid  does  not  produce  thyroxin  and 
is  therefore  functionally  inactive,  and  it  may  be  also  that  such  a  thyroid 
produces  a  smaller  amount  of  the  individuality  differential  substance ;  this  con- 
dition would  tend  to  diminish  the  invasion  of  the  transplant  by  lymphocytes. 
Accordingly,  we  found  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  in  these  serial  transplan- 
tations of  thyroid  gland  either  lacking  or  slight;  but,  the  fact  that  the  indi- 
viduality differentials  in  strain  A  approach,  although  they  do  not  quite  attain, 
an  autogenous  state  would  in  itself  be  sufficient  to  account  for  a  lack  of 
lymphocytes.  However,  in  the  preceding  experiments  we  noticed  that  after  a 
single  transplantation  of  the  thyroid  gland,  a  sclerosed  organ  could  be  infil- 
trated quite  markedly  with  these  cells.  There  is  reason  for  assuming,  then, 
that  in  the  case  of  the  thyroid  gland  a  deficiency  in  the  amount  of  hormone 
produced  by  the  host  thyroid  is  not  required  for  a  successful  transplantation 
of  this  organ,  and,  correspondingly,  it  is  doubtful  whether  the  diminution  in 
function  of  the  sclerosed  thyroid  renders  its  transplantation  easier. 

Transplantation  between  nearly  related  individuals  in  inbred  strains  of  mice. 
If  the  inbreeding  in  mice  had  led  to  a  completely  autogenous  condition  of  the 
individuality  differentials  among  all  the  members  of  a  closely  inbred  strain, 
there  should  be  no  difference  between  the  results  of  transplantations  between 
nearly  related  mice — namely,  those  which  belong  to  the  same  litter  and  their 
own  parents — and  between  other  mice  which  belong  to  different  litters.  They 
all  should  show  autogenous  reactions.  We  carried  out,  accordingly,  a  con- 
siderable number  of  experiments  in  which  we  studied  transplantations  of 
various  tissues,  but  especially  of  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  between  near 
relatives,  and  those  between  brothers  and  sisters. 

From  these  experiments  it  may  be  concluded  that  in  brother-to-brother 
transplantations,  autogenous  reactions  predominated  in  all  strains,  and  to  the 
highest  degree  in  strains  A,  C3H  and  CBA ;  but  syngenesio-reactions  did  occur, 
even  in  strain  A,  although  they  were  more  frequent  in  strains  D  and  C57,  and 
in  the  latter  strain  even  one  homoiogenous  reaction  was  noted,  with  some  in- 
crease in  fibrous  tissue.  Variations  in  the  age  of  the  hosts  within  the  range  of 
2  and  6  months  did  not  seem  noticeably  to  affect  these  results.  The  syngenesio- 
transplants  were  characterized  especially  by  an  increase  in  lymphocytes,  which 
could  destroy  even  otherwise  autogenous  tissue ;  but  there  could  be  associated 
with  this  reaction  a  slight  increase  of  fibrous  tissue.  It  was  observed  also  that 
transplantations  from  one  donor  to  two  hosts,  or  from  two  donors  to  one  host, 
might  elicit  somewhat  different  reactions.  We  note,  then,  that  even  in  brother- 
to-brother  transplantations  a  complete  identity  of  the  individuality  differentials 
in  these  inbred  strains  has  not  yet  been  attained,  and  that  again  differences 
exist  in  this  respect  between  different  strains.  But  there  are  indications  that  in 
transplantations  between  litter  mates  the  average  of  the  reactions  approaches 
somewhat  more  completely  the  autogenous  type  than  in  transplantations  be- 
tween non-litter  mates ;  this  seems  to  be  the  case,  in  particular,  in  strains  D 
and  C57.  In  all  these  transplantations  there  was,  as  a  rule,  a  correspondence 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  107 

between  the  reactions  against  the  different  tissues  transplanted  from  one  single 
donor  into  the  same  host.  It  was  also  of  interest  that  in  cases  in  which  an 
infection  had  taken  place  in  a  transplant  between  near  relatives  within  an 
inbred  strain,  this  infection  and  the  reaction  against  the  transplant  usually 
remained  localized  and  did  not  interfere  with  a  good  preservation  of  the  tissue 
at  some  distance  from  the  place  of  infection. 

In  strain  D,  a  number  of  transplantations  were  carried  out  in  which  tissues 
were  transplanted  from  parents  to  children,  or  from  children  to  parents.  In 
these  experiments,  also,  autogenous  or  almost  autogenous  results  were  ob- 
tained, but  the  number  of  syngenesio-reactions,  with  marked  lymphocytic  in- 
filtration, was  distinctly  greater  than  when  tissues  were  exchanged  between 
brothers  and  sisters.  In  some  instances,  even  homoiogenous  reactions  were 
noted.  On  the  whole,  the  reactions  in  transplantations  from  children  to  parents 
were  somewhat  less  favorable  than  the  reciprocal  ones.  Also,  in  strain  C57, 
transplantations  from  parents  to  children  and  from  children  to  parents  gave, 
in  the  majority  of  cases,  autogenous  reactions,  but  there  were  several  marked 
syngenesio-reactions.  In  seven  transplantations  from  C57  children  to  C57 
parents  the  average  grade  was  2.59.  In  strain  A,  autogenous  reactions  were 
obtained  in  transplantations  from  parents  to  children.  In  a  general  way,  it 
seems  that  in  these  transplantations  between  mice  in  which  the  individuality 
differentials  were  very  similar  but  not  yet  identical,  lymphocytic  reactions  were 
more  frequent  than  in  transplantations  between  more  distantly  related  mice. 
This  corresponds  to  the  fact  that  a  lymphocytic  reaction  is  especially  prone  to 
develop  when  the  thyroid  transplants  are  well  developed,  while  in  a  stunted 
thyroid,  such  as  we  find  especially  after  transplantations  between  more  dis- 
tantly related  mice,  the  lymphocytic  reaction  is  either  lacking  entirely  or  at 
least  it  is  weaker. 

Exchange  of  tissues  between  hybrids  composed  of  two  different  inbred 
strains  and  between  hybrids  and  parents  as  a  test  for  their  individuality 
differentials.  In  the  beginning  of  this  chapter  experiments  have  already  been 
reported  in  which  we  transplanted  tissue  of  hybrids  (C57xD)F1  to  mice  be- 
longing to  different  litters  as  well  as  to  the  same  litter  of  the  same  kind  of 
hybrid,  and  other  experiments  in  which  we  exchanged  tissues  between  hybrids 
and  parents,  and  vice  versa.  A  few  experiments  were  also  considered  in  which 
we  transplanted  tissues  from  hybrids,  not  to  their  direct  parents  but  to  other 
members  of  their  parent  strains. 

In  earlier  investigations  we  had  carried  out,  on  a  somewhat  larger  scale, 
similar  transplantations  in  which  we  used  hybrid  strains  (C57xA)F1,  (tan 
C57xA)Fx  and  F2,  and  (C57xC)Fx,  as  well  as  the  reciprocal  hybrids.  It  will 
not  be  necessary  to  describe  these  experiments  in  detail,  because  they  gave 
essentially  the  same  results  as  the  transplantations  already  discussed.  We  shall, 
therefore,  merely  state  the  main  results  obtained. 

In  the  following  table,  the  results  of  transplantations  discussed  in  the  be- 
ginning of  this  chapter  (Group  I)  and  of  this  group  (Group  II)  are  shown. 
There  may  be  added  to  the  data  contained  in  this  table  the  fact  that  in  control 
experiments,  in  which  transplantations  of  tissues  (thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat 


1.29 

2-2.26-2.81 

1.50 

1.44 

1.42 

1.48 

2.60 

2.54 

2.35 

3.04 

3 

or  2 .  75 

1.91 

108  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tissue)  to  strange  strains  (AKA,  Old  Buffalo  and  C)  were  made,  as  usual 
severe  homoiogenous  reactions  approaching  grade  1  were  obtained. 

The  data  in  table  I  show  a  very  good  correspondence  in  group  I  and  group 
II,  and  their  significance  is  thereby  increased.  In  addition  to  the  conclusions 
already  discussed,  it  may  furthermore  be  stated  that  transplantations  from 
parents  to  hybrids  do  not  correspond  to  autogenous  but  to  syngenesiotrans- 

TABLE  I 

Group  I  Group  II 

Inter-strain  transplantations 

Intra-strain  transplantations 

From  hybrid  Fi  to  parent  strains 

From  hybrids  Fi  to  actual  parents 

From  parents  to  hybrids  Fi  (children) 

From  parents  to  hybrids  Fi  (not  actual  children) 

From  hybrids  Fi  to  brothers 

From  hybrids  Fx  to  other  hybrids  Fi  (not  brothers) 

plantations,  and  that  transplantations  from  hybrids  to  parents  seem  to  give 
somewhat  higher  grades  than  the  average  homoiotransplantations  in  not  inbred 
strains,  and  inter-strain  transplantations  in  inbred  strains.  These  facts,  to- 
gether with  the  better  results  obtained  in  transplantations  between  hybrid  Fx 
brothers  than  in  those  between  parents  and  hybrid  Flf  suggest  the  presence  of 
a  considerable  number  of  genetic  factors  as  determiners  of  the  individuality 
differentials,  and  they  also  confirm  the  conclusion  that  the  strains  which  were 
used  for  hybridization  had  not  yet  attained  a  completely  homozygous  condi- 
tion. 

Besides  these  transplantations  between  parents  and  hybrids  F1  into  which 
two  inbred  strains  had  entered,  we  carried  out  some  experiments  in  which 
transplantations  were  made  from  the  second  generation  of  hybrids  (black 
C57xA)F2  and  (tan  C57xA)F2  to  their  parents,  which  were  hybrids  Flt  and 
to  their  grandparents,  C57  and  A,  and  also  the  reciprocal  transplantations; 
in  addition  we  grafted  tissues  from  some  F2  hybrids  to  their  brothers.  The 
results  obtained  may  be  summarized  as  follows : 

(1)  From  (black  or  tan  C57xA)F2  to  parent  hybrids  F1 :  mostly  syngenesio- 
reactions. 

(2)  From  (black  or  tan  C57xA)F2  to  grandparents  (C57  or  A)  :  mostly 
homoio-reactions. 

(3)  From  (black  or  tan  C57xA)F!  to  hybrid  F2  children  :  mostly  syngenesio- 
reactions  (somewhat  less  favorable  than  those  in  1).  The  reactions  in  (1)  and 
(3)  are  intermediate  between  those  from  parents  to  Fx  hybrids  and  from  F1 
hybrids  to  parents. 

(4)  From  (tan  C57xA)F2  to  brothers:  results  intermediate  between 
syngenesio-  and  homoiogenous  reactions  (average  grade  2.05).  These  are  less 
favorable  than  those  obtained  in  transplantations  from  hybrids  F1  to  brothers. 
In  general,  the  results  in  these  various  transplantations  in  which  hybrids  F2 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  109 

enter,  are  in  accordance  with  expectations,  considering  the  fact  that,  in  con- 
trast to  the  homogeneous  genetic  constitution  in  the  Fx  generation,  in  the  F2 
hybrids,  different  individuals  may  differ  in  their  genetic  constitution. 

Transplantation  of  ovaries  in  inbred  mice  and  interaction  between  endocrine 
factors  and  individuality  differentials.  We  have  carried  out  a  larger  series 
of  transplantations  of  the  ovary  in  inbred  mice  for  two  reasons :  1 )  the  ovary 
in  the  mouse  offers  certain  advantages  over  other  organs  for  the  study  of  the 
relations  between  transplantation-reactions  and  the  character  of  the  individu- 
ality differentials,  since  this  organ  contains  a  variety  of  structures  which  differ 
greatly  in  sensitiveness  and  thus  in  their  ability  to  survive ;  it  presents  a  grada- 
tion in  the  degree  of  reactions  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  donor,  without  regard  to  the  cellular  response  of  the  host  against  the 
transplant.  The  corpora  lutea  and  large  follicles  are  the  most  sensitive  struc- 
tures ;  they  are  followed  in  order  of  decreasing  sensitivity,  or  of  increasing 
resistance,  by  the  medium,  small  and  primordial  follicles,  by  germinal  epi- 
thelium and  ducts  derived  from  it,  by  medullary  ducts,  by  cortical  spindle  cell 
connective  tissue,  and  by  interstitial  gland.  The  Fallopian  tubes,  situated  near 
the  ovaries,  are  also  rather  resistant  structures.  By  noting  the  survival  or  lack 
of  survival  of  these  different  constituents  of  the  ovary,  we  can  grade  the 
degree  of  similarity  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor  ; 
(2)  the  ovary,  also  on  account  of  its  structure,  is  a  good  test  organ  for  the 
evaluation  of  the  importance  of  endocrine  factors,  of  age  of  donor  and  host, 
as  well  as  of  the  sex  of  the  host  in  the  results  of  transplantation.  We  are  espe- 
cially concerned  with  the  question  as  to  how  far  the  endocrine  influences, 
which  originate  in  the  host  ovaries,  may  affect  the  fate  of  the  transplants.  The 
associated  structures  of  the  ovary,  such  as  germinal  epithelial  cysts  and  ducts, 
medullary  ducts  and  interstitial  gland,  together  with  the  Fallopian  tubes,  are 
comparable  in  their  power  of  resistance  to  thyroid  gland,  striated  muscle 
tissue  and  some  other  organs,  since  they  are  at  least  partially  preserved  under 
conditions  in  which  the  various  types  of  follicles  are  in  a  graded  manner 
destroyed.  Because  the  transplantation  of  the  ovary  of  the  mouse  has  thus 
many  advantages  over  that  of  many  other  organs  in  the  analysis  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials,  we  have  carried  out  a  large  number  of  ovarian  trans- 
plantations in  various  inbred  strains  of  mice,  but  this  account  will  be  limited 
to  a  brief  statement  of  some  of  the  principal  conclusions  at  which  we  have 
arrived. 

In  grafting  the  ovaries  in  strains  AKA,  Old  Buffalo,  and  to  some  extent 
also  in  strain  New  Buffalo,  the  follicles  are  much  more  injured  than  are  the 
associated  structures  of  the  ovary  and  the  constituents  of  other  organs  usually 
used  in  our  transplantations,  indicating  a  difference  in  the  constitution  of  the 
individuality  differentials  in  the  animals  composing  each  of  these  strains.  In 
the  other  strains,  A,  C3H,  CBA,  C57  and  D,  the  disharmony  between  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  is  not  so  great  that  it  affects  the  state  of  the  follicles 
very  considerably,  although  it  may  affect  especially  the  formation  of  large- 
sized  follicles  and  corpora  lutea  under  conditions  in  which  the  preservation  of 
small-sized  follicles  is  not  yet  interfered  with.  In  these  latter  strains,  in 


110  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  the  individuality  differentials  have  become  more  similar  although  not 
yet  completely  identical,  accumulations  of  lymphocytes  may  still  allow  a  grad- 
ing of  the  different  degrees  of  homozygosity  which  have  been  attained.  The 
lymphocytes  invade  first  the  tissues  adjoining  the  ovaries,  and  only  later  the 
ovary  proper.  Within  the  ovary  the  lymphocytes  invade  the  granulosa  of 
preserved  follicles  last;  they  seem  to  be  especially  attracted  by  the  yellow 
vacuolated  interstitial  gland  tissue,  which  corresponds  closely,  in  some  re- 
spects, to  certain  cell  complexes  found  in  the  cortex  of  the  adrenal  gland  in 
mice.  In  both  of  these  organs  vacuolated  cells  may  act  as  phagocytes,  neigh- 
boring cells  may  coalesce,  or  the  nuclei  may  form  central  rosettes.  By  the 
combined  use  of  the  lymphocytic  reaction  and  of  the  survival  of  the  various 
types  of  follicles  as  tests  for  the  individuality  differentials,  the  strains  can  be 
arranged  in  the  following  order  of  decreasing  homozygosity:  (1)  strain  A; 
(2)  strains  C3H  and  CBA;  (3)  strains  C57  and  D;  (4)  strain  New  Buffalo; 
(5)  strain  Old  Buffalo,  and  (6)  strain  AKA.  In  strain  Old  Buffalo,  the  best 
results  were  obtained  if  the  ovaries  were  transplanted  into  ovariectomized  sis- 
ters, but  neither  ovariectomy  nor  the  close  relationship  between  donor  and  host 
alone  was  sufficient  to  insure  a  good  preservation  of  the  follicles.  However,  in 
general  there  are  conditions  in  which,  with  the  aid  of  a  hormone  constellation 
that  is  very  favorable  for  the  survival  or  growth  of  the  transplanted  ovaries, 
the  latter  may  be  preserved  and  the  follicles  may  grow  even  in  transplants 
from  different  litters.  This  was  the  case  after  transplantations,  for  long 
periods  of  time,  into  castrated  males ;  such  mice  offer,  perhaps,  the  most  favor- 
able hormone-constellation,  which  may  overcome  the  damage  caused  by  a 
certain  degree  of  incompatibility  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant.  Likewise  in  strain  A,  in  which  there  is  also  a  difference  in 
the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials  between  mice  belonging  to 
the  same  and  to  different  litters,  the  removal  of  the  ovaries  somewhat  im- 
proved the  results. 

While  in  strains  New  Buffalo  and  AKA  transplantations  into  sisters  seemed 
to  have  an  advantage  over  transplantations  into  different  litters,  ovariectomy 
did  not  appear  to  be  of  much  significance,  the  improvement,  at  best,  being  only 
slight.  Transplantation  into  males  gave  at  least  as  good  results  as  transplanta- 
tion into  female  mice,  and  after  transplantation  into  older  mice  there  was  in 
quite  a  number  of  cases  a  survival  of  the  ovarian  structures.  Furthermore, 
given  favorable  relations  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
donor,  ovarian  transplants  may  remain  alive  in  the  host  for  a  length  of  time 
which  is  so  great  that  the  age  of  the  ovary,  or  of  some  of  its  surviving  struc- 
tures, may  exceed  the  average  age  of  the  individuals  belonging  to  a  certain 
strain.  Thus,  in  a  nonovariectomized  mouse,  young  corpora  lutea  were  found 
in  a  transplanted  ovary  which  had  remained  in  the  host  for  about  18  months; 
here,  lymphocytic  infiltration  had  occurred.  Also  in  strain  A  it  was  not  diffi- 
cult to  recover  well  preserved  ovaries  which  had  been  transplanted  for  half  a 
year  or  longer.  Moreover,  in  strains  A  and  C57,  ovaries  were  successfully 
transplanted  into  12  to  20  months  old  female  mice.  In  strain  C57,  donor  and 
host  belonged  to  different  litters  and  the  hosts  had  not  been  ovariectomized.  In 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  111 

a  15  months  old  host,  2^  months  after  transplantation,  good,  large  follicles 
and  many  well  preserved  corpora  lutea  were  found  and  there  was  only  a  slight 
lymphocytic  infiltration ;  likewise  in  a  19  months  old  host,  large  follicles 
were  noted,  but  here  there  was  too  some  lymphocytic  infiltration  around  the 
ovary.  We  have  found  indications  also  that  a  lymphocytic  infiltration  may  set 
in  late,  and  further,  that  a  number  of  successive  transplantations  may  lead  to 
injury  of  the  transplant. 

Such  serial  transplantations  were  carried  out  in  strain  A.  The  transplanted 
ovaries  remained  in  each  host  for  4  to  6  months,  after  which  time  they  were 
re-transplanted  into  another  host.  Altogether,  the  ovaries  were  thus  kept  in 
successive  hosts  for  periods  ranging  between  14  and  24  months  and  the  age 
of  these  ovarian  grafts  varied  between  24  and  36  months.  Only  in  four  of 
eleven  of  these  serial  transplants  was  living  transplanted  tissue  found  at  the 
end  of  the  experiment ;  and  only  associated  structures  were  recovered,  such  as 
germinal  epithelium  lining  a  cyst,  ducts  consisting  of  germinal  epithelium,  and 
interstitial  gland  tissue ;  in  one  instance,  also  a  Fallopian  tube  with  preserved 
epithelium,  connective  tissue  and  muscle  tissue  was  found.  Lymphocytic  in- 
filtrations were  observed  in  some  cases  around  or  near  surrounding  parts. 
These  experiments  prove  that  only  the  most  resistant  tissues  were  able  to 
survive,  and  they  also  indicate  that  the  ovary  is  less  suitable  for  such  serial 
transplantations  than  the  thyroid  gland. 

Transplantation  of  anterior  pituitary  glands  as  indicators  of  individuality 
differentials  in  inbred  strains  of  mice.  We  have  shown  previously  that  anterior 
pituitary  glands  may  be  transplanted  successfully  and  that  such  transplants 
may  exert  effects  on  the  ovaries,  which,  under  certain  conditions,  increase  the 
incidence  of  mammary  gland  carcinoma  in  the  inbred  strain  A.  Additional  ex- 
periments have  now  been  made,  in  which  we  compared  the  reactions  against 
these  transplants  in  various  inbred  strains  differing  in  regard  to  the  homozy- 
gous state  which  they  had  attained.  In  most  cases,  between  two  and  six  pitui- 
tary glands  from  sisters  and  brothers  were  transplanted  subcutaneously. 

In  this  series  of  transplantations,  the  transplants  of  anterior  pituitary  glands 
survived  readily  for  long  periods  of  time  in  most  of  the  inbred  strains,  espe- 
cially if  the  glands  were  taken  from  brothers  and  sisters.  However,  in  the  Old 
Buffalo  strain,  the  transplants  had  apparently  been  destroyed  at  the  time  of 
examination ;  whether  this  was  an  accidental  occurrence  or  is  an  indication  of 
a  more  destructive  action  of  the  host  against  the  transplant,  perhaps  caused  by 
a  greater  dissimilarity  of  the  individuality  differentials,  an  effect  similar  to  that 
seen  after  transplantation  of  the  ovaries  in  this  strain,  needs  further  investiga- 
tion. The  most  interesting  observation  from  our  point  of  view  is  the  fact  that 
under  the  conditions  of  these  experiments,  lymphocytic  infiltration  around  or 
in  the  transplant  was,  on  the  whole,  rare,  and  if  it  occurred  at  all  it  usually 
remained  slight.  In  this  respect  the  results  differ  from  those  obtained  after 
long-term  transplantation  of  thyroid  gland,  ovaries  and  adrenal  gland,  where 
as  a  rule  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  more  marked.  On  the  basis  of  these 
experiments  we  may  also  conclude  that  the  transplantation  of  anterior  pitui- 
tary glands  is  less  suited  for  the  analysis  of  individuality  differentials  than  that 


112  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  some  other  organs,  because  they  elicit  so  weak  a  reaction  on  the  part  of  the 
host  and  do  not,  therefore,  make  possible  finer  gradations  of  the  individuality 
differentials  in  the  various  strains. 

Transplantation  of  the  adrenal  gland  and  the  analysis  of  the  individuality 
differentials.  While  some  of  the  principles  concerning  the  nature  of  the 
individuality  differentials  have  been  established  through  the  experiments  on 
transplantation,  which  we  have  already  discussed,  still,  it  may  be  expected 
that  an  extension  of  the  type  of  organs  and  tissues  subjected  to  transplanta- 
tion may  give  additional  data.  Such  further  information  was  obtained  by 
means  of  transplantation  of  the  adrenal  gland. 

As  far  as  the  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials  is  concerned,  the 
most  important  observation  in  these  experiments  concerns  the  lymphocytic  in- 
filtration, which  was  found  to  occur  with  increasing  intensity  around  degener- 
ating cortical  tissue  as  late  as  eight  or  ten  months  after  transplantation,  while, 
on  the  contrary,  well  preserved  areas  of  cortical  tissue  were  not  invaded 
by  lymphocytes.  This  condition  corresponds  to  the  action  of  the  lymphocytes  of 
the  host  towards  ovarian  transplants  from  donors  whose  individuality  differ- 
entials differed  from  those  of  the  host.  Here,  also,  the  lymphocytes  invaded 
mainly  degenerating  interstitial  gland  tissue  and  not  at  all,  or  only  very  rarely, 
the  preserved  granulosa  of  well  developed  follicles.  Therefore,  certain  struc- 
tures within  several  types  of  transplanted  organs  behaved  not  unlike  auto- 
genous transplants,  while  other  structures,  especially  those  undergoing  a  cer- 
tain kind  of  degenerative  change,  behaved  like  homoiotransplanted  tissue.  We 
have  already  discussed  the  possible  causes  for  these  peculiar  responses  of 
different  structures;  the  possibility  exists  that  certain  tissue  differential  sub- 
stances may  combine  with  strange  individuality  differentials  to  form  sub- 
stances whch  attract  the  lymphocytes ;  or  some  types  of  growing  or  well  pre- 
served tissues  may  give  off  substances  which  protect  them  against  an  invasion 
by  lymphocytes,  which  might  otherwise  occur  if  disharmonious  individuality 
differentials  interact;  or  lastly,  it  is  conceivable  that  individuality  differen- 
tials are  produced  or  set  free  in  larger  quantity  in  certain  stages  of  regression 
in  various  tissues.  However,  such  a  behavior  of  the  lymphocytes  is  not  usual. 
Thus,  we  have  found  very  strong  indications  that  well  preserved  thyroid  tissue 
can  be  invaded  and  destroyed  by  masses  of  lymphocytes,  if  there  is  a  slight 
divergence  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  In 
autotransplanted  organs  we  have  not  observed,  thus  far,  a  marked  invasion  by 
lymphocytes  of  the  degenerating  cells,  but  this  point  is  being  investigated  still 
further  at  the  present  time  in  the  case  of  adrenal  glands.  In  non-transplanted, 
autogenous  adrenals  frequently  degenerative  changes  occur,  similar  to  those 
which  attract  the  lymphocytes  in  transplants,  but  they  do  not  lead  to  intensive 
accumulation  of  these  cells.  The  time  at  which  accumulations  of  lymphocytes 
occur  seems  to  vary  in  different  inbred  strains;  it  apparently  takes  place 
earlier  in  strains  in  which  the  differences  between  the  individuality  differen- 
tials of  the  various  members  of  the  inbred  strains  are  as  yet  considerable.  It  is 
also  of  interest  that  pronounced  infiltration  with  lymphocytes  may  be  seen  in 
transplants  from  sisters  or  brothers  in  closely  inbred  strains,  but  they  occurred 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  113 

here  at  very  late  periods.  This  fact  again  seems  to  confirm  the  conclusion 
that  the  individuality  differentials  in  these  inbred  strains  have  not  yet  reached 
an  autogenous  condition. 

Transplantation  of  the  thyroid  and  parathyroid  glands  for  longer  periods 
of  time  in  various  strains  of  mice  and  the  analysis  of  the  individuality  differ- 
entials. These  experiments  were  made  in  addition  to  earlier  transplantations 
of  the  thyroid  gland,  which  we  have  reported  in  the  preceding  pages,  and  in  the 
large  majority  of  which  the  examination  took  place  at  earlier  periods,  usually 
between  12  and  30  days  following  transplantation. 

In  strain  A,  seven  transplantations  of  thyroid  and  parathyroid,  either  alone 
or  in  combination  with  other  organs,  were  made ;  examination  took  place 
between  9  and  15  months,  mostly  between  10  and  11  months,  following  trans- 
plantation. The  thyroid  and  parathyroid  glands  were  well  preserved,  although 
there  was  in  some  instances  a  small  amount  of  fibrous  tissue  around  some 
acini.  In  or  around  all  transplants,  except  one,  there  was  definite  lymphocytic 
infiltration,  which  was  moderate  in  some  cases  and  marked  in  others.  This 
also  occurred  in  a  case  in  which  donor  and  host  belonged  to  the  same  litter.  We 
may  then  conclude  that  an  autogenous  relationship  between  the  individuality 
differentials  has  not  yet  been  reached  and  that  the  absence  of  lymphocytic 
infiltration  at  a  given  time,  indicating  apparent  compatibility  between  the 
individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  does  not  actually  prove  such 
a  harmonious  condition ;  it  merely  indicates  a  lack  of  incompatibility  great 
enough  to  cause  a  lymphocytic  reaction  at  a  particular  time,  but  does  not  ex- 
clude the  possibility  that  if  the  transplants  had  remained  in  the  host  for  longer 
periods,  such  a  reaction  would  have  occurred. 

In  strain  D,  thirteen  transplantations  of  thyroid  and  parathyroid  were  made ; 
in  all  but  four  cases  the  organs  from  brothers  and  sisters  were  used.  In  two  of 
the  animals  from  different  litters  no  transplants  were  found  9  months  after 
transplantation.  In  the  two  remaining  animals  from  different  litters,  8  months 
and  20  days,  and  4  months  after  transplantation  respectively,  the  structure 
of  the  transplants  was  not  like  that  of  autogenous  grafts  and  here  was  much 
lymphocytic  infiltration.  In  the  nine  cases  in  which  donors  and  hosts  belonged 
to  the  same  litter,  the  examination  took  place  in  most  instances  about  9  and 
11  months  after  transplantation;  in  one,  the  time  of  examination  was  about 
4  months,  and  in  another  it  was  1  month  and  3  weeks.  In  only  two  of  these 
transplants,  namely  in  those  examined  after  9  months,  was  the  lymphocytic 
infiltration  lacking;  in  seven  grafts  it  was  moderate  or  marked,  but  in  every 
case  quite  definite.  These  experiments  confirm  then  again  the  conclusion,  that 
a  homozygous  condition  did  not  exist  in  strain  D.  We  may  add  that  this  is  due 
not  merely  to  an  early  branching-off  of  sublines  from  the  main  line,  because 
late  reactions  occurred  also  between  brothers  and  sisters,  therefore  between 
members  of  this  strain,  which  have  been  propagated  continuously  and  directly 
by  brother  and  sister  matings.  In  both  strain  A  and  strain  D,  antagonistic 
reactions  of  the  hosts  may  thus  develop  against  tissues  which  had  been  trans- 
planted a  considerable  number  of  months  previously. 

In  strain  C57  the  grafts  remained,  in  eight  cases,  from  2  to  8>2  months  in 


114  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  hosts.  The  outcome  of  these  experiments  also  indicates  that  there  was 
a  lack  of  a  completely  homozygous  condition. 

In  strain  New  Buffalo,  only  those  grafts  in  which  donors  and  hosts  were 
litter  mates  survived  for  greater  lengths  of  time;  lymphocytic  infiltration 
occurred  in  these  transplants  . 

In  strain  Old  Buffalo  the  transplantations  carried  out  were  fewer  in  number 
than  in  the  other  strains.  As  far  as  we  can  judge  from  these  experiments, 
the  individuality  differentials  in  this  strain  are  farther  removed  from  the 
autogenous  state  than  those  in  strains  A,  C3H,  D,  C57,  and  CBA.  This  con- 
clusion would  be  in  harmony  with  our  findings  in  the  related  New  Buffalo 
strain,  although  in  the  latter  the  reactions  against  transplants  from  other 
individuals,  belonging  to  the  same  strain,  was  less  severe  than  in  the  Old  Buffalo 
strain. 

On  the  whole  our  previous  findings  concerning  differences  or  similarities 
between  the  individuality  differentials  in  the  various  inbred  strains  of  mice 
are  therefore  confirmed  in  these  experiments. 

In  general,  we  may  conclude  from  all  our  experiments  with  closely  inbred 
strains  of  mice  that,  as  with  inbred  rats  and  even  with  inbred  guinea  pigs,  an 
autogenous  state  of  the  individuality  differentials  has  not  yet  been  reached, 
and  that  the  degree  to  which  this  state  has  been  approached  differs  in  different 
strains.  However,  it  is  probable  that  the  differences  in  the  severity  of  reactions 
against  transplants  from  other  members  of  the  same  inbred  strains  are  not 
entirely  due  to  the  different  degree  to  which  the  genetic  constitutions  have 
become  similar  in  the  various  individuals  belonging  to  a  strain ;  it  may  be  due 
also  to  the  differing  intensity  of  the  reactions  of  different  hosts  against  a 
similar  degree  of  disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials  in  a  given 
strain.  Yet,  after  all,  it  is  principally  the  differences  in  the  genetic  constitution 
between  the  various  members  of  a  strain  and  therefore  also  the  differences  in 
the  individuality  differentials  of  these  animals,  which  determine  the  character 
of  the  reactions  against  transplanted  tissues  and  organs.  All  these  experiments 
add  then  new  evidence  for  the  conclusion  that  multiple  factors  determine  the 
nature  of  the  individuality  differentials  and  that  the  time  of  the  appearance 
of  a  reaction  may  be  an  indicator  of  the  degree  of  disharmony  between  the 
individuality  differentials  of  different  hosts  and  donors;  if  the  disharmony  is 
relatively  slight,  the  reaction  may  appear  at  a  late  date  following  transplantation. 

A  complication  may  be  caused  by  the  fact  that  various  organs  and  tissues 
may  differ  very  much  in  the  intensity  of  the  cellular  reactions  which  they 
induce  in  the  host.  We  observed  formerly  that  cartilage  is  relatively  inert 
and  we  attributed  this  characteristic  to  the  relatively  inactive  metabolism  in 
this  tissue.  We  have  now  found  that  also  anterior  hypophysis  is  a  tissue  that 
remains  relatively  well  preserved  after  transplantation  and  that  calls  forth 
no  lymphocytic  reaction,  or  only  a  slight  one.  This  organ  is  therefore  not 
well  suited  for  the  analysis  of  fine  differences  in  the  individuality  differentials. 
Furthermore,  we  see  that  different  structures  in  the  ovary  induce  the  lympho- 
cytic reaction  to  a  very  different  degree;  the  yellow  interstitial  gland  tissue 
and  also  the  corpus  luteum  tissue  are  quite  active  in  this  respect,  while  the 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  CLOSELY  INBRED  MICE  115 

preserved  granulosa  of  follicles  is  not  readily  invaded  by  lymphocytes.  An  even 
more  striking  example  of  such  differences  is  to  be  noted  in  the  activity  of  differ- 
ent structures  within  the  adrenal  gland.  Here,  the  degenerating  yellow  cortical 
tissue  attracts  lymphocytes  in  large  masses,  although  this  reaction  in  its  full 
strength  may  occur  only  very  late  after  transplantation ;  on  the  other  hand, 
preserved  strands  of  glomerulosa  or  fasciculata  cells  are  not  invaded  by 
lymphocytes.  Such  peculiar  differences  in  the  attraction  which  various  tissues 
exert  on  lymphocytes  and  which  must  be  connected  with  peculiarities  in  the 
metabolism  of  these  various  tissues,  may  prevent  a  complete  correspondence 
between  reactions  against  different  kinds  of  tissues  which  have  been  trans- 
planted at  the  same  time,  from  the  same  donor  into  the  same  host. 


Chapter  10 

Heterogenous  Transplantation  of  Normal 
Tissues  and  of  Blood  Clots 

We  shall  now  discuss  the  characteristic  features  of  heterotrans- 
plantation. The  marked  toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids,  causes  early 
injury  and  necrosis  of  the  transplants,  without  the  co-operation 
necessarily  of  cellular  elements  of  the  host.  This  necrosis  affects  different 
organs  and  different  tissues  with  unequal  rapidity  in  accordance  with  the 
degree  of  resistance  of  these  structures,  and  even  within  the  same  organ  or 
tissue  there  may  be  differences  in  the  rapidity  of  necrosis,  inasmuch  as  those 
parts  which  are  in  general  more  resistant  in  their  constitution,  or  which, 
owing  to  their  situation,  are  more  protected  against  various  kinds  of  injurious 
factors,  succumb  less  quickly  to  the  action  of  the  heterotoxins.  Organs  or 
tissues  which  have  a  low  degree  of  resistance,  such  as  bone  marrow,  or  a 
medium  degree  of  resistance,  such  as  thyroid,  kidney,  fat  tissue,  striated 
muscle  tissue  or  epidermis,  are  destroyed  by  the  heterotoxins  within  one  or 
two  weeks.  In  the  skin,  the  hair  follicles  are  more  resistant  than  the  epidermis 
proper,  a  fact  which  agrees  with  the  observation  that  under  certain  conditions, 
for  instance,  after  painting  the  skin  with  the  carcinogenic  hydrocarbon 
methylcholanthrene,  the  epithelium  of  the  hair  follicles  shows  a  higher  degree 
of  resistance  than  other  parts  of  the  epidermis.  Cartilage  may  survive  for 
four  weeks  or  somewhat  longer,  although  in  some  instances  it  may  undergo 
necrosis  sooner.  Thus,  in  transplantation  from  rat  to  guinea  pig,  necrosis  of 
cartilage  and  perichondrium  may  be  found  after  20  days  or  even  as  early 
as  after  12  days.  Likewise,  in  the  exchange  of  tissues  between  rat  and  mouse 
the  greater  part  of  the  cartilage  in  one  case  was  preserved  as  late  as  25  days 
after  transplantation,  while  in  some  other  animals  cartilage  and  perichondrium 
soon  became  entirely  necrotic.  Fat  tissue  as  a  rule  was  found  necrotic  very 
early,  as  for  instance,  after  6  days,  and  it  was  usually  invaded  by  connective 
tissue  cells  and  by  small  vacuolated  cells,  the  latter  evidently  representing 
phagocytes,  which  took  up  fat  in  the  form  of  small  droplets.  Some  lymphocytes 
were  observed  admixed  to  the  connective  tissue  and  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  were  found  frequently,  sometimes  in  large  quantities,  sometimes 
only  as  scattered  cells.  There  were  certain  heterotransplants  in  which  no 
leucocytes  were  to  be  seen  at  the  time  of  examination.  After  homoiogenous 
transplantation  the  necrosis  of  the  fat  tissue  is,  as  a  rule,  less  extensive  than 
after  heterotransplantation,  the  necrotic  tissue  is  less  actively  invaded  by 
connective  tissue,  and  furthermore,  under  sterile  conditions  of  operation 
the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are  usually  entirely  lacking,  except  in  the 
first  few  days  after  operation. 

116 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  117 

The  connective-tissue  reaction  around  the  heterotransplants  is  in  general 
very  strong;  there  is  a  tendency  for  the  connective  tissue  soon  to  become 
transformed  into  fibrous-hyaline  tissue,  which  latter  encapsulates  the  trans- 
plant and  may  surround  some  of  its  constituent  parts  and  injure  it  through 
the  exertion  of  mechanical  pressure;  but  in  certain  heterotransplants,  such 
as  those  of  thyroid  or  kidney,  where  the  tissues  early  become  entirely  necrotic, 
the  ingrowth  of  the  connective  tissue  cells  was  at  first  less  marked  than  it  is  in 
those  homoiotransplants  where  the  reactions  are  severe ;  it  seems  that  a  heter- 
ogenous tissue,  which  is  either  completely  necrotic  or  is  near  death,  and  in 
which  the  metabolism  is  therefore  very  weak  or  wholly  suspended,  may 
attract  fibroblasts  less  actively  than  a  more  energetically  metabolizing  tissue 
which  is  giving  off  homoiotoxins. 

In  syngenesiotransplants  and  in  some  homoiotransplants  large  and  dense 
masses  of  lymphocytes  may  invade  and  destroy  the  grafted  tissue  independ- 
ently of  a  preceding  activity  of  the  connective  tissue.  Such  a  condition  we  do 
not  find  in  heterotransplants.  Here,  lymphocytes  may  invade  the  graft  usually 
only  in  association  with  the  connective  tissue  of  the  host.  This  invasion  of 
lymphocytes  may,  in  the  course  of  time,  be  quite  marked;  it  may,  however, 
remain  slight  or  be  lacking  altogether  if  the  heterotransplant  becomes  entirely 
necrotic  at  an  early  date,  as  often  occurs  when  thyroid  or  kidney  is  trans- 
planted ;  but  even  in  these  cases  a  considerable  lymphocytic  infiltration 
may  later  take  place  in  the  fibrous  capsule  surrounding  the  graft,  or  in  the 
fibrous  tissue  adjoining  it,  or  sometimes  also  in  the  fibrous-hyaline  tissue  that 
has  replaced  the  graft,  where  it  may  exceed,  in  density,  the  infiltration  found 
in  the  majority  of  homoiotransplants. 

As  stated,  the  appearance  of  larger  numbers  of  polymorphonuclear  leuco- 
cytes distinguishes  heterogenous  transplants  from  homoio-  and  syngenesio- 
transplants; these  cells  accumulate  in  and  around  the  capsule,  they  may 
pentrate  into  the  transplant  and  be  found  around  or  in  the  necrotic  tissue; 
they  may  either  be  scattered  or  may  form  small  accumulations,  or  even  dense 
masses,  in  certain  areas.  Necrotic  material  seems  to  be  their  chief  point  of 
attraction.  In  and  around  homoiotransplants,  on  the  other  hand,  leucocytes  as 
a  rule  are  noted  only  in  the  first  three  days  following  the  operation  when 
necrosis  and  changes  in  the  circulation  and  in  the  permeability  of  vessels  may 
be  responsible  for  their  appearance;  they  occur  in  these,  and  even  in  syn- 
genesiotransplants of  the  mouse,  more  frequently  in  places  where  much  fibrous 
tissue  has  been  produced,  and,  above  all,  in  fibrous  tissue  that  has  invaded  and 
replaced  fat  tissue.  The  possibility  exists  that  in  the  mouse  we  may  have  to 
deal  with  bacterial  infection  in  those  homoiotransplants  in  which  leucocytes 
appear  in  larger  numbers',  and  this  raises  the  question  as  to  whether  also 
in  heterotransplants  the  accumulation  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  may 
not  at  least  in  part  be  due  to  contamination  with  bacteria.  The  presence  of 
bacteria  and  their  responsibility  for  the  accumulation  of  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  is  suggested  particularly  also  by  the  development,  in  some  instances, 
of  localized,  abscess-like  masses  of  these  cells  in  or  around  the  heterotrans- 
plants. Furthermore,  the  fact  that  if  a  piece  of  mammalian  tissue  is  trans- 


118  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

planted  into  a  frog  for  only  a  few  hours  and  then  re-transplanted  into  a 
mammalian  host,  large  collections  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are  at- 
tracted by  it  and  then  destroy  the  transplant,  likewise  suggests  this  interpre- 
tation. Similar  is  the  result  if  pigeon  skin  is  transplanted  for  various  periods 
into  the  frog  and  then  re-transplanted  into  the  guinea  pig.  That  necrosis  as 
such,  even  necrosis  of  fat  tissue,  cannot  be  responsible  for  the  accumulation 
of  such  cells  in  or  around  the  transplant  is  shown  by  the  observation  that 
in  rat  and  guinea  pig,  as  well  as  in  pigeon  and  chicken,  necrotic  areas  do  not 
noticeably  attract  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  if  the  necrosis  develops  in 
homoiotransplanted  tissues.  And  even  in  the  mouse  there  are  many  homoio- 
transplants  entirely  free  from  leucocytic  infiltration. 

Various  considerations,  however,  make  it  seem  more  likely  that  these  cell 
accumulations  are  due  to  heterotoxins,  which  are  given  off  by  the  graft  and 
which  diffuse  into  the  surrounding  tissue,  especially  after  the  graft  has 
become  necrotic.  We  must  then  assume  that  there  are  chemical  differences 
between  the  necrotic  areas  in  homoiogenous  and  in  heterogenous  tissues, 
which  are  responsible  for  the  different  modes  of  reaction  of  the  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes,  and  that  the  latter  are  attracted  by  either  necrotic  or  living 
tissue,  in  contrast  to  homoiogenous  tissues,  which  do  not  attract  them,  although 
a  few  isolated  leucocytes  may  be  found  here  also  in  the  first  few  days  follow- 
ing transplantation ;  however,  the  possibility  cannot  as  yet  be  entirely  excluded 
that  the  growth  of  microorganisms  is  promoted  by  conditions  present  in  the 
heterotransplants,  as  compared  to  those  in  auto-  and  homoiotransplants,  or 
that  both  these  factors — microorganisms  and  heterotoxins — may  be  active. 
That  a  greater  strangeness  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  graft 
may  favor  the  accumulation  of  bacteria  is  shown  especially  in  mice;  when 
transplants  come  from  nearly  related  donors,  the  collections  of  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  usually  remain  localized  at  one  spot,  while  similar  collec- 
tions in  transplants  from  further  distant  donors  often  affect  the  transplanted 
piece  as  a  whole,  or  at  least  over  wider  areas.  As  we  have  seen  in  the  preceding 
chapter,  together  with  the  leucocytes,  also  connective  tissue,  lymphocytes, 
and,  in  the  case  of  the  fat  tissue,  small-vacuolated  phagocytic  cells,  invade  the 
homoiotransplanted  mouse  tissue.  In  our  laboratory  several  experiments  have 
been  made  for  the  purpose  of  deciding  between  the  various  possibilities  re- 
garding the  appearance  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  and  some  associated 
conditions. 

1.  Siebert  exposed,  in  the  water  bath,  the  thyroid  and  cartilage,  with  ad- 
joining fat  tissue,  of  rats  to  temperatures  ranging  from  43°  to  51°,  for  from 
15  to  45  minutes,  and  then  transplanted  these  pieces  into  guinea  pigs;  exami- 
nation took  place  after  20  days.  The  activity  of  lymphocytes  and  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  was  only  slightly  decreased  and  the  connective  tissue  reac- 
tion was  even  somewhat  increased  as  compared  with  that  observed  in  tissues 
not  previously  heated.  We  interpret  these  results  as  indicating  that  heteroge- 
nous tissues,  even  if  they  are  killed  through  heating  previous  to  transplanta- 
tion, still  possess  and  give  off  their  specific  heterotoxins  to  almost  the  same 
extent  as  the  unheated  tissues.  When  the  same  procedure  was  used  with 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  119 

homoiotransplanted  tissues,  the  latter,  when  killed  by  heating,  no  longer 
elicited  the  typical  homoio-reaction.  There  was  a  marked  lessening  of  the 
lymphocytic  reaction  normally  called  forth  by  homoiotransplanted  thyroid  or 
cartilage  together  with  the  adjoining  fat  tissue,  but  again  the  connective  tissue 
reaction  was  not  markedly  diminished  in  such  a  thyroid  transplant ;  it  could 
even  be  slightly  increased.  The  reaction  of  the  connective  tissue  is  partly 
directed  against  necrotic  tissue;  it  is,  therefore,  not  seriously  affected  by  the 
heating.  But,  the  much  more  specific  lymphocytic  reaction  in  case  of  homoio- 
transplantation  depends  upon  the  presence  of  actively  metabolizing  tissue, 
because  homoiotoxins  are  produced  and  given  off  mainly  by  functioning 
homoiogenous  tissue.  This  interpretation  is  supported  also  by  other  observa- 
tions and  experiments,  to  which  we  shall  refer  later.  Of  interest  is  also  the 
finding  of  Siebert,  that  heating  homoiogenous  cartilage  and  perichondrium  at 
47°  for  30  minutes  seemed  to  increase  the  regeneration  of  cartilage  by  the 
perichondrium  around  necrotic  injured  cartilage.  On  the  other  hand,  it  might 
be  argued  that  the  heterotoxic  action  remains  almost  as  strong  after  heating 
as  it  was  in  the  case  of  unheated  tissues,  because  the  exposure  to  moderate 
heat  did  not  seriously  injure  the  contaminating  bacteria ;  but  against  this 
interpretation  may  be  cited  experiments  in  which  the  heterogenous  tissues 
were  exposed  to  the  temperature  of  boiling  water.  In  these  experiments,  to 
which  we  have  already  referred,  the  thyroid  and  cartilage,  with  adjoining  fat 
tissue,  of  rats,  were  boiled  for  5  minutes  in  normal  NaCl  solution  and  then 
transplanted  to  guinea  pigs.  In  the  examination,  which  took  place  after  12 
and  20  days,  the  reactions  were  found  to  be  essentially  the  same  as  after 
heterotransplantation  of  the  unboiled  tissues,  except  that  in  the  boiled  thyroid 
the  colloid  of  the  acini  remained  preserved  in  the  grafts,  while,  as  was  to  be 
expected,  the  acinus  tissue,  as  well  as  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  was  necrotic. 
The  essential  point  in  such  experiments  is  that  the  boiled  heterogenous  tissues 
still  attracted  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  large  numbers,  and  that  the 
infiltration  with  the  latter  was  almost  as  strong  as  in  the  transplants  of  non- 
boiled  rat  tissues  in  the  guinea  pig ;  lymphocytes  were  in  evidence  in  or  around 
these  tissues  after  12  days,  but  they  were  no  longer  found  after  20  days, 
although  they  were  seen  in  the  unboiled  grafts  at  this  time.  It  is  very  difficult 
to  believe  that  under  the  conditions  of  these  experiments  bacterial  infection 
was  the  cause  of  the  accumulation  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  cr 
around  the  transplants. 

2.  In  further  support  of  these  conclusions,  there  may  be  cited  experiments 
carried  out  by  Blumenthal,  to  which  we  have  already  referred.  When  he 
transplanted  small  pieces  of  autogenous,  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  tis- 
sues under  the  skin  in  various  species,  changes  in  the  absolute  number  and 
distribution  of  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  took  place  in 
the  circulating  blood,  which  in  principle  corresponded  to  those  occurring 
locally  around  such  transplants.  In  the  case  of  homoiotransplantation  there 
was  an  increase  in  lymphocytes,  which  began  in  the  first  few  days  following 
transplantation  and  reached  a  maximum  between  about  the  third  and  tenth 
days.  The  exact  time  of  the  maximum  varied  with  different  tissues,  according 


120  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  the  consistency  of  the  pieces,  which  evidently  determined  the  readiness 
with  which  the  individuality  differential  substances  were  extracted  from  the 
tissues.  After  syngenesiotransplantation,  the  reactions  appeared  somewhat 
later,  in  accordance  with  the  diminished  toxicity  of  the  substances  given  off 
by  transplants  of  this  type.  The  reactions  to  heterogenous  grafts  consisted 
in  a  primary  increase  in  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  circulating  blood, 
which  tended  to  appear  a  few  days  earlier  than  the  reactions  to  homoiogenous 
transplants.  After  heterotransplantation  of  thyroid  tissue,  the  maximum  in 
the  count  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  was  reached  on  about  the  fifth 
day,  approximately  two  days  earlier  than  the  maximum  observed  after 
homoiotransplantation ;  however,  the  reaction  sets  in  as  early  as  on  the  2nd 
or  3rd  day  after  the  operation,  but  then  a  regression  in  the  number  of  leuco- 
cytes begins  and  on  about  the  10th  day  a  normal  count  has  again  been 
reached.  This  is  followed  by  a  secondary  reaction  consisting  in  a  relative  and 
absolute  increase  in  lymphocytes,  which  usually  reaches  a  maximum  between 
the  14th  and  16th  days  and  likewise  is  followed  by  a  regression  to  normal.  These 
reactions  occurred  in  the  guinea  pig,  rat  and  mouse  with  equal  regularity. 
That  they  were  caused  by  contamination  with  bacteria  can  be  excluded,  since, 
as  a  rule,  no  infection  was  found,  and  even  where  after  homoiotransplantation 
a  slight  infection  with  bacteria  had  taken  place,  this  did  not  call  forth  a  notice- 
able increase  in  the  number  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  blood ; 
such  an  increase  was  observed  only  in  cases  in  which  pus  from  an  abscess, 
that  had  formed  in  and  around  the  graft,  had  ruptured  and  escaped  into  the 
surrounding  tissue.  A  small  number  of  microorganisms  did  not  therefore 
cause  alterations  in  the  number  and  distribution  of  blood  cells,  such  as  is 
seen  after  transplantation  of  heterogenous  tissues.  In  these  experiments  as 
well  as  in  those  in  which  the  local  reactions  around  transplants  were  studied 
the  results  were,  on  the  whole,  constant  and  this  fact  again  could  not  very 
well  be  reconciled  with  the  assumption  that  bacterial  contamination  and  sub- 
sequent growth  of  the  bacteria — occurrences  which  are  of  an  accidental  char- 
acter and  therefore  necessarily  variable — were  responsible  for  these  changes. 
3.  A  direct  attempt  was  made  to  follow  the  fate  of  bacteria  normally  ad- 
hering to  pieces  of  skin  after  its  transplantation,  in  order  to  determine  their 
possible  role  in  the  attraction  of  leucocytes.  In  these  experiments,  Ermatinger, 
Queen  and  Parker  transplanted  autogenous  as  well  as  heterogenous  earskin 
pieces  into  the  subcutaneous  tissues;  after  1,  2  or  3  days,  they  were  removed 
for  bacterial  examination.  Autotransplants  of  skin  in  guinea  pigs,  rats  and 
rabbits  were  studied,  as  well  as  heterotransplants  from  guinea  pigs  to  rats 
and  rabbits,  and  also  the  reciprocal  transplants.  A  progressive  decrease  in  the 
number  of  bacteria  in  the  skin  pieces  was  found  on  successive  days.  The  large 
majority  of  the  microorganisms  were  destroyed  within  the  first  24  hours, 
while  after  48  hours  nearly  25  per  cent  of  the  plates  were  sterile ;  after  3  days, 
sterile  plates  were  found  in  62  per  cent  of  the  cases  and  in  the  rest  of  the 
pieces  the  number  of  colonies  was  very  small.  Staphylococci  survived  longest. 
However,  during  the  very  hot  season  a  considerable  increase  in  the  number 
of  bacteria  was  observed  in  the  first  three  days  in  several  instances  and  the 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  121 

count  of  bacteria  living  on  the  normal  skin  seemed  to  be  higher  during  the 
hot  summer  weather  than  during  other  seasons.  There  was  also  some  indica- 
tion that  the  destruction  of  the  bacteria  proceeded  more  actively  after  hetero- 
transplantation than  after  autotransplantation  of  the  skin. 

The  results  in  all  these  experiments  make  it  probable  that  the  poly- 
morphonuclear leucocytes  were  attracted  to  heterotransplanted  tissue  not 
mainly  by  bacteria  attached  to  these  tissues,  but  by  the  action  of  heterotoxins. 
While  it  seems  that  this  is,  in  general,  the  correct  interpretation,  still,  under 
certain  conditions,  and  especially  in  transplantations  carried  out  in  the  mouse, 
it  may  well  be  that  slight  infections  with  microorganisms  play  a  certain  role ; 
but  it  is  probable  that  even  if  microorganisms  should  be  involved,  they  act  in 
conjunction  with  toxins  derived  from  the  tissues  and  that  they  exert  a  greater 
effect  when  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  differ  greatly 
from  each  other  than  when  they  are  closely  related. 

We  may  further  conclude  that  while  the  typical  reaction  against  syngenesio- 
and  homoiotransplants  occurs  only  if  these  tissues  are  alive  and  presumably 
actively  metabolizing,  the  heterotoxins  are  present  and  active  also  in  dead 
tissues.  Additional  evidence  in  favor  of  this  conclusion  is  furnished  by  the 
results  of  experiments  in  which  the  reactions  of  a  host  against  autogenous, 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  blood  clots  were  compared.  If  autogenous 
and  homoiogenous  blood  clots  are  transplanted  into  the  guinea  pig,  the  charac- 
teristic differences  that  are  found  between  the  reactions  of  the  host  against 
autotransplants  and  homoiotransplants  of  living  tissues,  such  as  thyroid,  kid- 
ney, epidermis,  or  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  are  almost  or  entirely  lacking.  This 
seems  to  be  due  to  the  fact  that  the  cellular  elements  enmeshed  in  the  net  of 
fibrin  soon  die  and  no  longer  give  off  the  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  sub- 
stances which  bear  the  individuality  differential.  These  clots  are  merely  organ- 
ized by  the  connective  tissue  and  the  blood  vessels  of  the  host  like  inert  foreign 
bodies,  no  noticeable  amount  of  homoiotoxins  being  given  off  after  trans- 
plantation into  another  individual  of  the  same  species.  As  a  result  of  the 
invasion  by  the  fibroblasts  of  the  autogenous  or  homoiogenous  host,  first  a 
provisional  organization  takes  place,  representing  a  mixture  of  blood  coagu- 
lum  and  of  the  cytoplasmic  substances  of  the  fibroblasts;  subsequently,  a 
definite  organization  is  effected  by  continued  ingrowth  of  fibroblasts.  A  few 
lymphocytes  may  be  admixed  to  the  capillaries  and  fibroblasts,  which  move 
into  the  clot,  but  they  are  not  frequent.  As  stated,  there  are  no  definite  differ- 
ences between  the  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  blood  clots  under  these  con- 
ditions. While  phagocytes  may,  to  a  limited  extent,  be  seen  in  homoiogenous 
blood  clots,  they  are  not  a  prominent  feature  in  the  process  of  organization. 
The  phagocytic  cells  distintegrate  into  granula,  which  later  help  to  form  a 
hyaline  material.  Polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are,  on  the  whole,  not  con- 
spicuous in  these  transplanted  blood  clots.  It  seems,  then,  that  the  non- 
nucleated  erythrocytes  included  in  the  network  of  fibrin  do  not  give  off 
homoiotoxins  to  any  noticeable  degree.  Much  more  pronounced  was  the  re- 
action against  heterogenous  blood  clots,  such  as  that  observed  if  clots  were 
exchanged  between  rat,  guinea  pig  and  rabbit.  In  these  cases,  accompanying  the 


122  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

connective  tissue  cells  surrounding  and  invading  the  clot,  were  many  lympho- 
cytes and  the  capsule  of  the  heterogenous  clot  was  thicker  than  that  of  the 
homoiogenous  clot.  However,  the  thickness  of  the  connective  tissue  capsule 
and  the  number  of  lymphocytes  varied  in  different  instances  and  even  in 
different  places  in  the  clot.  Areas  of  partial  solution  also  were  visible  and  a 
larger  number  of  phagocytic  cells  was  present  in  such  heterogenous  clots. 
The  latter  cells,  which  may  show  a  xanthoma-like  tissue  arrangement,  are  able 
to  dissolve  particles  of  fibrin  as  well  as  the  erythrocytes.  Furthermore,  the 
hemolysin  present  in  the  serum  of  the  host  and  active  against  the  blood  cells 
of  strange  species  may  help  in  the  solution  of  parts  of  the  coagulum.  Also, 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  which  again  are  much  more  prominent  in 
heterogenous  than  in  homoiogenous  transplants,  invade  the  clot  and  may  aid 
in  its  destruction.  These  differences  in  reaction  against  different  types  of  clots 
are  quite  definite,  although  the  same  technique  was  used  in  these  various  trans- 
plantations. In  principle,  the  reaction  against  all  kinds  of  heterogenous  clots  is 
about  the  same,  although  some  minor  quantitative  differences  may  exist  in 
different  species;  thus,  in  the  guinea  pig  the  solution  of  the  clot  proceeded 
somewhat  more  actively  than  in  the  rat  and  likewise  the  number  of  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  in  and  around  the  clots  was  somewhat  greater  than  in  the  rat. 
These  experiments  indicate,  then,  a  noticeable  similarity  between  the  behavior 
of  heterogenous  blood  clots  and  heterogenous  tissues.  In  both  cases,  lympho- 
cytes as  well  as  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  participate  in  the  reaction  in 
addition  to  the  connective  tissue,  and  heterotoxins  are  given  off  by  nOn-living 
material  in  both  types  of  heterotransplants ;  on  the  other  hand,  homiotoxins, 
are  given  off  only  by  living  tissue  transplants,  but  not  to  any  marked  degree 
by  the  necrotic  homoiogenous  blood  clots. 

By  measuring  the  lymphocytic  and  leucocytic  reaction  in  the  circulating 
blood,  Blumenthal  discovered  not  only  differences  between  the  reactions 
against  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  blood  clots,  but  he  found  also  differ- 
ences between  the  reactions  against  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  clots,  cor- 
responding to  those  found  against  the  corresponding  normal  tissues,  in  par- 
ticular, he  noticed  an  early  increase  in  lymphocytes  after  homoiogenous  trans- 
plantation of  blood  coagula.  By  means  of  this  method  he  could  show,  further- 
more, that  also  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  plasma  clots  may  elicit  the 
typical  blood  cell  reactions,  although  they  appeared  somewhat  later  than  the 
reactions  following  transplantation  of  the  whole  blood  clot.  It  appears,  then, 
that  the  individuality  differential  substances  are  present  also  in  fibrin,  although 
they  may  perhaps  not  be  of  the  same  kind  as  those  present  in  the  cells.  The 
reactions  affecting  the  white  cells  in  the  circulating  blood  seem  to  indicate  the 
presence  of  substances  in  the  blood  which  are  carriers  of  the  individuality 
differentials,  although  they  do  not  elicit  the  local  homoiogenous  reactions. 
These  reactions,  which  are  called  forth  by  fibrin  and  which  presumably  are 
present  also  in  fibrinogen,  are  not  induced  by  injections  of  blood  serum ;  the 
latter  does  not  apparently  possess  these  individuality  differential  substances. 
However,  it  is  possible  that  the  individuality  differential  substances  in  cells 
included  in  whole  blood  clots  are  the  same  as  those  present  in  the  fibrin,  but 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  123 

that  the  differences  in  the  local  reaction  and  the  reaction  in  the  circulating 
blood  is  due  to  a  greater  sensitiveness  of  the  latter,  which  allows  the  recogni- 
tion of  homoiogenous  differentials  in  material  in  which  these  differential  sub- 
stances are  present  in  so  small  a  quantity  that  they  can  not  be  discovered  by 
the  local  reaction.  But  in  this  instance  we  have  again  to  consider  the  possibility 
that  less  specific  reactions  against  non-living  protein  material  may  participate 
in  these  general  reactions  and  that  this  factor  may  introduce  a  complication 
which  is  absent  in  the  local  reaction. 

There  are  some  additional  questions  concerning  heterogenous  transplanta- 
tions which  are  of  more  general  interest  and  which  we  shall  now  consider : 
(1)  Does  a  relationship  exist  between  the  time  of  survival  and  the  growth 
processes  in  heterotransplants  and  the  reactions  of  the  host  tissue  against  the 
latter,  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  between  host  and 
transplant  on  the  other?  (2)  What  are  the  relations  between  growth  processes 
in  heterotransplants  and  time  of  survival?  To  what  extent  do  regenerative 
growth  processes  take  place  in  heterotransplants?  (3)  What  differences  occur 
in  heterotransplantation  of  different  organs  and  tissues?  (4)  Do  the  results  of 
reciprocal  heterogenetic  transplantations  differ  and  what  is  the  reason  for 
this  difference?  In  order  to  answer  these  questions  we  may  discuss  briefly  the 
principal  results  obtained  in  some  of  our  series  of  heterotransplantations, 
while  we  omit  a  description  of  others.    * 

Heterotransplantation  of  guinea  pig  skin.  In  association  with  W.  H.  F. 
Addison,  we  observed  that  after  transplantation  of  guinea  pig  skin  into  other 
species  the  epithelial  cells  grew  less  actively  than  after  homoiotransplantation, 
but  the  growth  continued  for  some  time,  as  indicated  by  the  presence  of 
mitoses  in  the  epidermal  cells.  Mitoses  were  found  in  the  rabbit  as  late  as  8 
days,  in  the  dog,  7  days,  and  in  the  pigeon  5  days  following  transplantation. 
However,  the  mitoses  were  less  numerous  than  after  homoiotransplantation 
and  the  difference  between  the  activity  in  the  homoio-  and  heterotransplanted 
tissue  increased  with  increasing  time  after  transplantation.  In  heterotrans- 
plants the  mitotic  activity  usually  ceased  a  few  days  before  the  tissue  became 
entirely  necrotic ;  but,  it  happened  that  a  mitosis  could  be  seen  near  the  time 
of  death.  The  hair  follicles,  which  are  burrowed  deep  in  the  tissue  and  are 
surrounded  by  a  connective  tissue  capsule,  thus  being  most  effectively  pro- 
tected, remained  alive  longest  and  showed  the  greatest  number  of  mitoses. 
Also,  the  cells  of  the  surface  epidermis  lived  for  some  time  and  continued  to 
produce  keratin;  the  connective  tissue  of  the  host  surrounded  the  trans- 
planted epidermis ;  yet  the  growth  energy  of  the  epithelium  was  too  weak  to 
cause  a  cystic  distention  of  the  transplant  from  pressure  of  the  newly  pro- 
duced keratin,  in  contrast  to  the  finding  after  homoiotransplantation,  where  the 
epidermis  does,  as  a  rule,  form  a  cyst.  However,  even  the  homoiotransplanted 
tissue  may  lose  this  ability  if  its  growth  energy  has  been  weakened,  as  for  in- 
stance, by  previous  serial  transplantation.  Lymphocytes  migrated  into  the 
heterotransplanted  epidermis  from  the  surrounding  host  tissue  and  they,  to- 
gether with  the  pressure  exerted  by  the  fibrous  capsule,  helped  to  destroy  the 
epithelium  which  had  already  been  injured  by  the  action  of  the  heterotoxins. 


124  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

After  re-transplantation  of  the  guinea  pig  epidermis  from  the  foreign 
species  back  to  the  guinea  pig,  the  epithelial  cells  grew  only  very  weakly  and, 
on  the  whole,  the  farther  removed  the  first  host  species  was  from  the  guinea 
pig,  the  shorter  was  the  interval  after  re-transplantation  during  which  mitoses 
appeared.  No  growth  took  place  in  the  guinea  pig  skin  after  transplantation 
into  the  frog,  which  is  so  unfavorable  a  soil  that  a  piece  remaining  longer  than 
3^2  hours  in  this  distant  species,  did  not  grow  after  subsequent  re-transplanta- 
tion into  the  original  donor.  Guinea  pig  skin  which  had  been  kept  in  the  rabbit 
for  2  days  was  able  to  grow  after  re-transplantation  into  its  own  species,  but 
pieces  that  had  been  longer  in  the  rabbit  died  after  re-transplantation;  in  the 
pigeon,  pieces  that  remained  less  than  5  days  could  be  successfully  re-trans- 
planted into  the  guinea  pig,  but  not  if  they  were  left  in  the  former  species  for 
a  longer  time.  If  we  consider  merely  the  duration  of  mitotic  activity  and  sur- 
vival after  a  single  heterotransplantation,  the  order  of  compatibility  for  guinea 
pig  skin  was  approximately  as  follows:  (1)  rabbit,  (2)  dog,  (3)  pigeon, 
(4)  frog.  But  in  general  the  differences  between  these  species  in  these  respects 
were  not  great,  with  the  exception  perhaps  of  the  frog,  which  had  a  very 
injurious  effect  on  the  transplanted  guinea  pig  skin.  However,  this  order  does 
not  obtain  in  regard  to  readiness  of  re-transplantation  of  this  tissue,  because 
a  primary  transplantation  from  guinea  pig  to  pigeon  was  less  injurious  to  the 
graft  than  a  primary  transplantation  to  rabbit. 

Heterotransplantation  of  pigeon  skin.  In  principle,  the  results  were  similar 
after  homoio-  and  heterotransplantation  of  pigeon  skin  to  those  found  in  the 
case  of  guinea  pig  skin,  but  there  were  also  some  interesting  differences.  Even 
after  homoiotransplantation  of  pigeon  epidermis  the  epithelial  proliferation 
was  found  to  be  very  slight,  although  epidermis  and  connective  tissue  re- 
mained largely  preserved.  While  the  homoiotransplanted  guinea  pig  skin 
formed  a  cyst  because  of  its  continued  proliferative  activity  and  keratin 
formation,  and  while,  for  the  same  reason,  a  necrotic  area  in  the  guinea  pig 
skin  was  rapidly  replaced  by  new  tissue,  the  pigeon  skin  did  not  give  rise  to 
the  formation  of  such  a  cyst  and  reparation  of  necrotic  tissue  did  not  take 
place  on  account  of  the  lesser  growth  energy  in  the  transplanted  pigeon  epi- 
dermis. 

Heterotransplantation  of  thyroid  gland.  Cora  Hesselberg  and  the  writer 
studied  transplantation  of  the  thyroid  gland  in  various  species,  (a)  Thyroid  of 
guinea  pig  to  rat:  The  heterotransplanted  thyroid  succumbed  readily  to  the 
action  of  heterotoxins,  remaining  preserved  for  a  short  time  only  under  the 
best  of  conditions.  The  primary  injury  of  the  graft  by  the  bodyfluids  of  the 
host  was  quite  noticeable  as  early  as  3  to  5  days  after  transplantation.  The 
number  of  mitoses  was  much  diminished,  but  they  still  could  be  seen  as  late 
as  9  days  after  operation ;  this  was  also  the  latest  time  at  which  living  tissue 
could  be  found.  The  epithelium  was  best  preserved  in  the  neighborhood  of 
growing  fibroblastic  tissue  and,  conversely,  growing  epithelium  seemed  to 
attract  the  fibroblasts.  The  latter  penetrated  also  between  acini  and  had  a 
tendency  to  form  dense  fibrous  tissue,  which  compressed  the  acini  and  con- 
tributed to  their  destruction.  The  vascularization  of  the  graft  was  very  poor, 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION 


125 


but  some  capillaries  were  noted  between  some  of  the  acini.  Lymphocytes  were 
seen  only  occasionally  in  these  places,  being  found  especially  where  fibro- 
blasts had  invaded  the  transplant  or  were  active  around  it,  as  well  as  in  the 
capsule  of  the  graft  surrounding  blood  vessels.  On  the  whole,  heterotrans- 
planted  thyroid  as  such  did  not  attract  lymphocytes  to  any  marked  extent; 
indeed,  these  cells  and  the  connective  tissue  contributed  only  secondarily  and 
to  a  minor  degree  to  the  destruction  of  the  graft. 

In  general,  the  connective  tissue  of  the  heterotransplanted  thyroid  became 
fibrous  during  the  second  week.  The  number  of  lymphocytes  in  the  transplant 
itself  was  small,  but  in  the  course  of  the  second  week  a  marked  accumulation 
of  lymphocytes  could  take  place  in  the  surrounding  capsule  and  at  some  dis- 
tance from  the  thyroid  proper;  lymphocytes  collected  also  in  the  fibrous  tissue 
resulting  from  the  organization  of  the  necrotic  material. 

Heterotransplantation  of  kidney  tissue  into  various  species,  studied  in 
association  with  M.  H.  Myers,  on  the  whole  gave  results  similar  to  those 
found  after  heterotransplantation  of  skin  and  thyroid,  but  the  duration  of 
mitotic  activity  and  the  survival  seemed  to  be  slightly  longer  in  the  case  of 
thyroid  and  kidney  than  of  skin.  A  comparison  of  the  period  of  survival  and 
of  mitotic  activity  in  these  various  series  of  experiments  is  shown  in  the  fol- 
lowing tables. 

TABLE  I 


Transplantation 
of  Skin 


Latest  Time  at 

Which  Mitoses 

Were  Seen 


Time  of  Survival  of 

Transplanted  Skin 

Tissue 


Pigeon 
Pigeon 
Pigeon 
Pigeon 
Guinea 
Guinea 
Guinea 
Guinea 


to  chicken 
to  guinea  pig 
to  rabbit 
to  frog 
pig  to  rabbit 
pig  to  dog 
pig  to  pigeon 
pig  to  frog 


7  days 

10-11  days 

0  days 

10  days 

(little  tissue  surviving) 

5  days 

5  day: 

;  (one  piece  10  days) 

0  days 

5  hrs. 

7-8  days 

10  days 

6-7  days 

7  days 

5  days 

10  days 

0  days 

1  day 

TABLE  II 


Transplantation  of 
Thyroid 


Latest  Time  at 
Which  Mitoses 
Were  Seen 


Time  of  Survival  of 

Transplanted  Thyroid 

Tissue 


Guinea  pig  to  rat 
Rabbit  to  rat 
Rabbit  to  guinea  pig 
Cat  to  rat 


9  days 

9  days 

6  days 

1 1  days  (a  few  mitoses) 


9  days 
11  days  (in  1  of  3  pieces) 
8  days 
14  (18?)  days 


Heterotransplantation  of  cartilage.  After  heterotransplantation  of  cartilage 
together  with  the  adjoining  fat  tissue,  connective  tissue  of  the  host  invaded 
and  largely  replaced  the  fat  tissue,  but  it  was  also  able  to  invade  the  cartilage, 


126  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

especially  the  necrotic  areas.  Fibrous  tissue  formed  in  larger  quantity  around 
the  heterotransplant  of  cartilage  than  around  that  of  thyroid  or  of  kidney, 
probably  because  cartilage  was  less  rapidly  destroyed  and  its  effect  on  the 
host  tissue  extended  therefore  over  a  longer  period  of  time ;  however,  a  similar 
reaction  could  take  place  also  around  heterotransplanted  thyroid  and  kidney 

TABLE  III 


Latest  Time  at 

Time 

of  Survival  of 

Transplantation  of 

Which  Mitoses 

Transplanted  Kidney 

Kidney 

Were  Se£n 

Tissue 

Mouse  to  rat 

9  days 

11  days 

Rabbit  to  rat 

11  days 

11  days 

Rabbit  to  guinea  pig 

5  days 

6  days 

Guinea  pig  to  rabbit 

12  days 

20  days 

Guinea  pig  to  cat 

7  days 

12  days 

Cat  to  guinea  pig 

0  days 

0  days 

Guinea  pig  to  pigeon 

6  days 

10  days 

Pigeon  to  guinea  pig 

0  days 

3f  days 

Pigeon  to  rat 

0  days 

0  days 

in  the  course  of  the  second  week.  In  accordance  with  the  large  amount  of 
fibrous  tissue  produced  especially  around  heterotransplanted  cartilage  and  fat 
tissue,  large  masses  of  lymphocytes  accumulated  in  the  surrounding  connective 
tissue  at  some  distance  from  the  graft;  a  similar  reaction  could  also  occur 
around  other  kinds  of  grafts,  but  it  was  observed  more  rarely  in  such  tissues 
as  thyroid,  skin  and  kidney,  as  a  rule,  probably  because  these  were  destroyed 
by  the  heterotoxins  more  rapidly  than  cartilage. 

Exchange  of  tissues  between  rat  and  mouse.  In  addition  to  the  transplan- 
tations mentioned  above,  we  carried  out  also  heterotransplantations  of  tissues 
from  rat  to  mouse  and  from  mouse  to  rat,  on  the  assumption  that  between 
these  relatively  nearly  related  species  the  reactions  against  heterogenous  grafts 
might  be  less  severe.  However,  we  found  that  the  reactions  did  not  differ  in 
severity  essentially  from  those  obtained  in  transplantations  between  the  other 
species  which  we  had  tested.  Transplantations  from  rat  to  mouse  and  recipro- 
cal transplantations  caused  much  more  severe  injury  than  homoio-  and  even 
inter-racial  transplantations.  Not  only  was  the  damage  greater  if  we  consid- 
ered the  average  results  obtained  in  a  number  of  individuals,  but  in  each  in- 
dividual case  it  was  very  great.  Moreover,  the  individual  variations  which  we 
have  found  between  different  homoio-  and  inter-racial  transplants  were  almost 
absent  in  this  series  and  this  lack  of  variation  applied  to  heterotransplantations 
in  other  species  as  well.  Only  the  time  of  survival  of  the  cartilage  hetero- 
transplanted into  mouse  or  rat  showed  more  marked  differences ;  in  some  cases 
it  became  necrotic  at  an  early  period  following  the  transfer  into  the  hetero- 
genous host,  while  in  other  cases  it  could  survive  for  almost  four  weeks,  or 
even  somewhat  longer.  But  the  degree  of  this  variability  was  more  apparent 
than  real,  inasmuch  as  even  under  the  best  conditions  the  new  formation  of 
cartilage  by  perichondrium,  which  is  found  around  necrotic  or  damaged  car- 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  127 

tilage  in  cases  of  homoiogenous  and  even  inter-racial  transplantation,  is  lacking 
in  this  type  of  heterotransplantation.  There  was  seen  only  one  instance  of 
heterotransplanted  cartilage  in  which  at  an  early  period  a  slight  attempt  at 
regeneration  was  apparently  observed ;  but  in  this  instance  the  interpretation 
was  not  certain.  These  findings  indicate  that  even  in  cases  in  which  struc- 
tural appearances  indicate  the  survival  of  the  cartilage  and  perichondrium, 
these  tissues  are  functionally  and  metabolically  no  longer  normal  or  com- 
parable to  the  corresponding  homoiotransplanted  tissues.  Similarly,  the  nu- 
clear multiplication,  which  is  a  sign  of  an  abortive  regeneration  in  injured 
areas  of  homoiotransplanted  striated  muscle  fibers,  is  lacking  in  heterotrans- 
plantations ;  here,  again,  there  was  one  possible  exception  observed  at  an  early 
period  following  exchange  of  tissues  between  rat  and  mouse,  and  in  this 
instance,  likewise,  the  interpretation  was  doubtful. 

Of  special  interest  in  these  experiments  were  some  differences  which  we 
observed  between  reciprocal  transplantations  in  mouse  and  rat.  The  number 
of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  as  a  rule,  was  greater  in  the  rat  to  mouse 
transplants  than  in  the  mouse  to  rat  transplants ;  this  corresponds  to  the  fre- 
quent appearance  of  leucocytes  in  the  mouse  also  in  many  cases  of  homoio- 
transplantation,  especially  in  the  fat  tissue.  On  the  other  hand,  in  the  mouse  to 
rat  transplants  the  fibrous  tissue  formation  was  more  advanced,  which  may 
perhaps  be  due  to  the  greater  reactivity  of  connective  tissue  cells  in  the  rat 
than  in  the  mouse,  which  we  had  noticed  likewise  in  homoiotransplantations. 
Similarly,  the  lymphocytic  reaction  was  stronger  in  the  rat  than  in  the  mouse ; 
again  this  corresponds  to  findings  in  homoiotransplants.  In  the  circumference 
of  these  heterotransplants  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  in  some  instances 
even  more  pronounced  than  around  homoiotransplants,  although  the  invasion 
of  the  heterotransplant  itself  by  lymphocytes  was  usually  less  than  that  found 
in  many  homoio-  and  even  in  some  syngenesiotransplants. 

Heterotransplantations  from  Peromyscus  maniculatus  to  mice  of  strain  C57 
and  the  reciprocal  transplantations.  Although  the  number  of  experiments  we 
could  carry  out  in  this  series  was  much  more  limited  than  in  other  series  of 
heterotransplantations,  nevertheless  the  results  were  concordant  and  we  are 
therefore  able  to  draw  some  additional  conclusions  regarding  heterotrans- 
plantations. The  difference  in  reactions  against  the  grafts  taking  place  in 
reciprocal  transplantations  was  evident  again  in  these  experiments.  The 
results  are  of  special  interest  also  on  account  of  the  somewhat  diminished 
severity,  in  certain  cases,  of  the  heteroreactions.  In  transplantations  from 
C57  to  Peromyscus  there  was  almost  complete  destruction  of  the  transplanted 
thyroid,  the  cartilage  with  adjoining  fat  tissue,  and  the  striated  muscle;  this 
was  noted  as  early  as  8  days  and  was  observed  thereafter  up  to  20  days 
following  the  operation.  Parts  of  cartilage  were  occasionally  found  preserved, 
and  after  12  days  even  a  mitosis  was  seen  in  a  peripheral  cartilage  cell.  Lym- 
phocytes as  well  as  scattered  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  were  noted  fre- 
quently in  these  transplants,  and  sometimes  there  were,  instead  of  scattered 
cells,  collections  or  even  masses  of  leucocytes.  The  fat  tissue  was  largely  or 
entirely  replaced  by  fibrous  tissue.  The  grades  were  1  throughout  this  series. 


128  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

The  reactions  were  less  severe  against  the  transplants  from  Peromyscus  to 
strain  C57.  Here  the  grades  were  better,  especially  in  early  periods  after 
transplantation.  At  8  days,  the  grades  were  2—  ;  at  12  days,  they  varied  be- 
tween 2—  and  1+  ;  at  15  days,  the  grades  were  1  and  1  +  ,  and  at  20  days, 
they  were  1  in  three  cases  and  1  +  in  one  case.  At  8  and  12  days,  some  pres- 
ervation of  thyroid  tissue  and  also  of  muscle  tissue  was  found  and  in  the 
latter  there  was  some  nuclear  proliferation;  also  at  15  days  a  small  part  of  the 
thyroid  was  preserved,  and,  in  one  case,  even  at  20  days.  The  fat  tissue  was 
replaced  by  fibrous  tissue  or  invaded  by  small  vacuolated  tissue.  At  15  and 
20  days  the  muscle  tissue  was  necrotic  and  more  or  less  organized  by  connec- 
tive tissue.  At  8  and  12  days,  no.  lymphocytes  but  scattered  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  were  seen  in  certain  instances.  At  15  days,  besides  variable  num- 
bers of  leucocytes  in  one  transplant,  also  some  lymphocytes  were  present, 
whereas  at  20  days,  only  leucocytes,  but  no  lymphocytes,  were  noted. 

We  find,  then,  a  definitely  less  severe  reaction  in  cases  in  which  C57  mice 
were  hosts  and  Peromyscus  were  donors,  than  in  the  reciprocal  transplanta- 
tions. Lymphocytic  infiltration  in  general  was  more  common  in  the  former 
experiments  than  in  the  latter.  These  findings  bring,  therefore,  additional  con- 
firmation of  the  conclusion,  that  in  addition  to  the  relations  of  the  individu- 
ality differentials  of  host  and  transplant  to  each  other,  the  strength  and  mode 
of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  transplant  is  also  a  factor  which  has  to 
be  taken  into  account  and  which  may  influence  the  results  obtained.  The  type 
of  reaction  which  a  certain  species  or  strain  shows  is  also,  in  all  probability, 
due  to  the  inherited  genetic  constitution.  It  is  furthermore  of  great  interest 
that  in  strain  C57,  the  reaction  against  heterotransplants  of  Peromyscus  may 
not  be  stronger  than  those  seen  in  a  type  of  homoiotransplantations  in  which 
the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor  are  very  dissimilar. 

On  the  basis  of  these  observations,  and  of  others  which  we  cannot  describe 
in  detail,  we  may  answer  the  questions  raised  in  the  beginning  of  this  dis- 
cussion. (1)  As  to  a  possible  corespondence  between  the  severity  of  hetero- 
genous reactions  in  different  combinations  of  species  and  the  phylogenetic 
relationship  of  these  species,  the  data  given  in  tables  1,  2  and  3  indicate  a 
relatively  great  similarity  in  all  these  species  as  to  time  of  survival 
and  mitotic  activity.  Both  periods  were  relatively  short  and,  in  general,  there 
was  no  very  definite  correspondence  between  phylogenetic  relationship  of 
donors  and  hosts  and  the  fate  of  the  transplants.  There  was  very  little  differ- 
ence between  the  results  of  experiments  in  which  tissues  of  rodents  were 
transplanted  to  other  rodents  and  in  those  experiments  in  which  tissues  were 
exchanged  between  rodents  and  cats;  in  some  instances,  transplantations  in 
the  latter  gave  even  better  results  than  in  the  former. 

Even  exchange  of  tissues  between  mammals  and  birds,  which  represent 
two  different  classes,  could  give  results  not  unlike  those  observed  in  trans- 
plantations between  species  as  near  as  rat  and  mouse.  Only  in  certain  cases 
was  there  an  indication  of  a  shorter  time  of  survival  and  mitotic  activity 
after  transplantation  into  different  classes.  Thus,  pigeon  skin  fared  better 
when  grafted  into  chicken  than  into  a  mammalian  species.  Transplantation  of 


HETEROTRANSPLANTATION  129 

mammalian  or  avian  tissues  into  the  frog  was  very  injurious,  but  it  is  doubt- 
ful whether  this  result  was  entirely  due  to  distance  of  phylogenetic  relation- 
ship; it  is  possible  that  bacterial  infection  played  a  role  in  this  instance. 

Evidently  the  heterotoxic  action  in  general  is  so  strong  that  all  hetero- 
transplanted  tissues  are  near  the  threshold  of  destruction  and  the  factor  of 
phylogenetic  relationship  becomes  thus  of  minor  importance;  under  these 
conditions,  a  little  more  or  a  little  less  intense  heterotoxic  action  may  be  of 
less  importance  than  some  other  factor  of  a  secondary  nature.  Thus  there  is 
some  indication  that  the  guinea  pig  may  represent  a  host  more  unfavorable 
to  certain  heterogenous  tissues  than  the  rat  or  rabbit. 

(2)  As  to  growth  processes  in  the  heterotransplants,  these  were  very  slight, 
as  might  be  expected  in  view  of  the  injurious  action  of  the  heterotoxins.  The 
mitotic  activity  usually  ceased  from  one  to  a  few  days  before  the  complete 
necrosis  of  the  transplant  occurred.  The  continuous  destruction  of  the  hetero- 
transplant  is  not  therefore  compensated  by  a  marked  new  formation  of  tissue. 
Heterotoxin  prevents  the  full  recovery  of  the  tissues  after  transplantation 
and  causes  their  death  after  a  relatively  short  time.  Correspondingly,  certain 
regenerative  processes  which  are  found  quite  normally  in  cases  of  homoio-, 
and  even  in  inter-racial  transplantations,  are  lacking  after  heterotransplanta- 
tion ;  this  includes,  for  instance,  the  new  formation  of  cartilage  from  the  peri- 
chondrium, as  well  as  the  multiplication  of  nuclei  in  striated  muscle  tissue. 
In  a  few  exceptional  cases,  at  early  periods,  there  were  possibly  some  indi- 
cations of  weak  regenerative  processes,  but  the  interpretation  in  these  in- 
stances was  doubtful.  Only  in  transplantation  from  Peromyscus  to  mice  of 
strain  C57,  restricted  regenerative  growth  was  noted  within  the  first  two 
weeks  after  grafting;  in  one  case,  even  a  mitosis  was  seen  in  a  young  car- 
tilage cell,  but  here,  also,  the  growth  soon  ceased.  It  seems  that  for  the 
same  reasons,  namely,  the  interference  of  active  heterotoxins,  it  is  difficult 
for  the  host  capillaries  to  make  connection  with  the  capillaries  in  the  trans- 
planted tissue  and  to  use  these  preformed  channels  for  the  establishment  of 
blood  circulation  in  the  transplant,  the  grafted  vessels  presumably  dying  soon 
after  transplantation;  furthermore,  this  factor  may  be  responsible  for  en- 
gorgement of  the  surrounding  vessels  and  for  hemorrhages  into  and  around 
the  transplant.  (3)  The  difference  in  the  fate  of  different  heterogenous  tis- 
sues used,  such  as  thyroid,  skin  and  kidney,  was  very  slight;  they  all  be- 
haved in  almost  the  same  manner  after  heterotransplantation ;  only  cartilage 
was  definitely  more  resistant,  as  it  was  also  in  homoiotransplantation.  It  fol- 
lows from  these  observations  that  the  method  of  heterotransplantation  is  not 
suited  for  the  determination  of  species  differences ;  serological  tests  are  pref- 
erable for  this  purpose.  In  this  respect,  heterotransplantation  differs  from 
homoio-  and  syngenesiotransplantation,  in  which  latter,  especially  the  cellu- 
lar reactions  as  a  rule  are  very  fine  indicators  of  the  degree  of  relationship 
between  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor  and  in  this  respect 
are  superior  to  serological  tests.  Transplantation  as  a  method  for  the  deter- 
mination of  individuality  differentials  may  be  compared  to  a  delicate  balance, 
able  to  distinguish  between  fractions  of  a  milligram  but  ill-adapted  to  the 


130  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

determination  of  differences  in  weight  amounting  to  pounds;  similarly, 
homoio-  and  syngenesiotransplantations  distinguish  between  the  finer  degrees 
of  relationship  of  individuality  differentials,  whereas,  heterotransplantation  is 
not  quite  adequate  for  the  finer  and  more  general  distinction  of  species  dif- 
ferentials. 

(4)  The  data  given  also  demonstrate  that  reciprocal  transplantations,  in 
which  the  role  of  donor  and  host  are  reversed,  may  differ  as  far  as  the  fate 
of  the  transplant  is  concerned.  We  have  referred  already  to  the  greater 
severity  of  reactions  found  in  some  instances  in  the  guinea  pig  than  in  the 
rat,  and  we  have  also  shown  the  difference  in  reactions  in  reciprocal  rat- 
mouse  and  C57-Peromyscus  transplantations.  Similar  differences  in  reciprocal 
transplantations  may  be  found  also  in  some  instances  in  homoio-  and  in 
syngenesiotransplantations.  It  is  the  host  which  reacts  against  the  graft,  but 
the  latter  does  not  seriously  affect  the  condition  in  the  host ;  the  ability  to  re- 
act strongly  against  a  strange  tissue  differs  in  different  species,  strains,  and 
probably  even  individuals. 

There  is  one  last  conclusion  which  is  of  more  general  interest.  In  the  case 
of  syngenesio-  and  homoiotransplantations  we  find  a  relatively  wide  range  of 
reactions  in  different  individual  experiments,  in  accordance  with  the  great 
range  of  variations  in  the  combinations  between  different  individuality  dif- 
ferentials of  host  and  graft.  In  contrast  to  these,  the  range  in  the  results  of 
heterotransplantations  is  rather  narrow ;  this  is  due,  at  least  partly,  to  the 
great  severity  of  the  reactions  in  heterogenous  transplantations,  which  ap- 
proaches a  threshold  already  in  the  relations  between  nearly  related  species, 
but  it  may  also  be  due  to  the  fact  that  the  range  of  variation  in  the  genetic 
constitution  of  the  species  differentials  is  much  smaller  than  that  of  the 
homoiogenous  differentials. 


Chapter    II 

Exchange   of  Tissues    Between    Different 
Varieties  or  Races  (Subspecies) 


The  reactions  against  heterogenous  transplants,  on  the  whole,  are 
sharply  denned  and  distinct  from  those  against  homoiogenous  trans- 
plants ;  a  transition  to  the  latter  is  seen,  however,  in  the  grafts  from 
Peromyscus  to  mice  of  strain  C57.  If  we  pass  from  transplantations  of  tis- 
sues between  different  species  to  transplantations  between  different  varieties, 
races  or  subspecies,  the  results  are  different ;  these  correspond  to  severe 
homoiogenous  reactions.  Such  experiments  were  carried  out  with  Gray 
Norway  rats  and  two  mutant  races  derived  from  them,  mutant  albino  and 
Curly  Coat ;  these  mutations  were  discovered  and  their  bearers  propagated 
by  Helen  Dean  King,  at  the  Wistar  Institute  in  Philadelphia.  Five  series  of 
transplantations  were  made,  each  one  representing  a  different  type.  I.  Autog- 
enous transplantation  of  thyroid  and  cartilage  and  adjoining  tissues  in  Gray 
Norway  rats;  II.  Syngenesiotransplantation  between  brothers  and  sisters  in 
Gray  Norway  and  the  two  mutant  races;  III.  Intrarace  transplantations  be- 
tween not  nearly  related  individuals  in  each  one  of  these  three  races;  IV. 
Interrace  transplantations  from  one  of  these  races  to  another;  V.  Exchange 
of  tissues  between  these  three  races  and  tame  albino  and  hooded  rats.  Exam- 
ination took  place  at  9,  12,  16  and  20  days  following  transplantation  ;  however, 
at  20  days  the  number  of  experiments  available  for  grading  was  not  as  large 
as  at  16  days. 

In  the  grading  of  the  reactions  in  these  experiments,  the  second  set  of 
grades  was  used.  In  autogenous  transplantations  in  the  Gray  Norway  rat 
the  grade  was  6.  The  average  grades  in  the  other  experiments,  together  with 
the  range  of  variations,  are  shown  in  table  1.  The  highest  and  lowest  grades 
in  each  case  represent  the  separate  grades  for  thyroid  only,  because  these 
grades  are  sharper  than  those  for  cartilage  transplants. 

From  these  results  we  may  draw  the  following  conclusions:  (1)  After 
autogenous  transplantation  in  the  wild  Gray  Norway  rat,  an  injurious  reac- 

TABLE  I 


.  „  ^  Range  of      t ,  _  Range  of      „„  ^  Range  of 

12  Days      X1  16  Days      ,,  20  Days     ,r 

Variation  Variation  Variation 


Series  II  4.42  5.5-3.4  3.3  5.2-2.3  2.05  3.6-1 

Series  III  3.15  5.5-1  2.55  4.8-1  2.20  3.9-1 

Series  IV  2.60  4.3-1  2.15  3.5-1  1.80  3.8-1 

Series  V  2.30  4.2-1  2.  3-1  2.15  3-1 

131 


132  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tion  against  the  transplant  was  absent.  (2)  In  series  II-V  with  increasing 
length  of  time  during  which  the  grafts  were  kept  in  the  hosts,  the  damage 
inflicted  on  the  transplants  became  greater ;  this  might  be  expected,  provided 
a  discrepancy  in  the  individuality  differentials  existed  between  hosts  and 
donors ;  it  did  not  occur  in  autogenous  transplantations  where,  on  the  contrary, 
signs  of  injury  due  to  the  operation  became  less  and  disappeared  in  the  course 
of  time.  (3)  If  we  consider  the  different  series,  we  find  that  the  intensity  of 
the  reactions  on  the  whole  increased  with  increasing  distance  of  relationship 
between  host  and  donor.  This  is  most  clearly  indicated  by  comparing  the 
grades  at  12.  and  16  days,  and  especially  also  by  comparing  the  combined 
grades  at  12  and  16  days.  The  latter  were  as  follows:  series  II,  3.9;  series 
III,  2.9;  series  IV,  2.4;  series  V,  2.2.  At  20  days,  the  difference  between  these 
four  series  had  almost  disappeared,  either  because  at  that  time  the  injury  had 
become  very  marked  in  all  of  them,  or  because  of  the  smaller  number  of 
experiments  that  were  available  for  the  determination  of  the  average  grade. 
The  combined  grades  for  thyroid  at  20  and  at  16  days  also  suggest  an  increas- 
ing deterioration  in  the  preservation  of  the  transplants  with  increasing  dis- 
tance of  relationship.  In  these  series,  and  especially  in  series  III,  IV,  and 
V,  the  reactions  were  relatively  severe  and  accordingly,  grade  1  was  fre- 
quent in  individual  transplantations.  The  reactions  were  not  so  strong 
in  some  instances  in  intrarace  transplantations,  although  in  other  cases  they 
also  were  severe.  This  is  especially  interesting  in  view  of  the  fact  that  some 
of  these  strains  had  been  inbred  for  a  considerable  number  of  generations, 
although  not  necessarily  by  brother-to-sister  breeding;  strain  Gray  Norway, 
for  instance,  having  been  inbred  for  45  generations.  Although  the  rats 
belonging  to  the  same  strain  were  closely  related,  still,  even  in  series  II  and 
III  the  reactions  were,  on  the  whole,  severe.  (4)  While  the  differences  be- 
tween the  grades  in  the  different  series  seem  to  be  real,  they  were  much  less 
than  one  might  have  expected,  considering  the  great  differences  in  relationship 
between  the  rats  in  these  different  series.  It  is  noteworthy  that  the  reactions 
even  between  brothers  and  sisters  were  very  marked  and  that  they  approached 
much  more  closely  the  reactions  against  distant  donors  than  those  against 
autogenous  transplants.  We  must  assume  that  the  individuality  differentials 
even  in  brothers  and  sisters  showed  quite  definite  differences  and  that  these 
were  great  enough  to  cause  injurious  reactions  against  the  grafts.  At  the 
same  time,  it  appears  probable  that  the  sensitiveness  of  the  host  and  his 
ability  to  react  against  even  relatively  slight  differences  in  the  constitution 
of  the  individuality  differentials  were  great.  (5)  The  transplantations  within 
the  mutant  albino  race  showed  less  severe  reactions  than  those  within  the 
other  mutant  race.  It  is  possible  that  the  mutant  albino  rats  reacted  less 
strongly  than  other  mutant  races  against  the  individuality  differentials  of 
rats  belonging  to  their  own  strain.  (6)  There  were  definite  indications  that 
also  in  rats  the  bodyfluids  reacted  on  the  transplants  in  accordance  with  the 
relationship  between  transplant  and  host,  and  that  the  reactions  of  the  host 
cells  were  superimposed  upon  the  effect  of  the  bodyfluids.  However,  in  many 
cases  the  damage  done  to  the  graft  by  the  latter  was  very  slight,  or  not  mani- 


EXCHANGE  OF  TISSUES  BETWEEN  VARIETIES         133 

fest,  the  principal  injurious  effect  being  that  exerted  by  the  cells  of  the  host. 
If  the  bodyfluid  was  injurious  in  a  given  host,  it  acted  on  the  various  organs 
and  tissues  from  the  same  donor  in  a  corresponding  manner.  These  various 
tissues  from  the  same  donor  must  therefore  all  have  possessed  the  same 
individuality  differential ;  otherwise  the  bodyfluid  from  the  same  host  could 
not  have  acted  on  all  of  them  in  this  way.  If  we  consider  in  a  general  way  the 
cellular  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  transplants  and  the  structural  changes 
in  the  latter,  in  these  various  series,  we  find  that  the  degree  of  necrosis  in  the 
grafts  and  the  degree  of  the  substitution  of  the  necrotic  tissue,  by  fibrous  tissue 
as  well  as  the  extent  of  the  invasion  of  living  tissue  by  fibrous  tissue,  became 
greater  with  increasing  distance  in  relationship  between  host  and  donor.  Like- 
wise, the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  the  more  marked  the  greater  the  distance 
in  relationship  between  host  and  graft,  provided  the  difference  between  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials  was  not  so  great  that  it  led  to  extensive  necrosis  of  the 
graft  and  largely  to  the  replacement  of  the  necrotic  issue  by  fibrous  tissue. 
Such  a  graded  replacement  by  connective  tissue  and  also  by  lymphocytes  could 
be  followed  especially  clearly  in  the  transplanted  fat  tissue ;  but  on  the  whole, 
the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  more  marked  around  and  in  the  thyroid  than 
in  the  cartilage-fat  tissue  transplants,  and  as  a  rule  there  was  a  correspondence 
between  the  reactions  against  the  thyroid  and  cartilage- fat  tissue.  In  autog- 
enous transplantation  of  the  thyroid  in  Gray  Norway  rats  the  connective 
tissue  tended  to  be  loose,  fibrillar-cellular  rather  than  fibrous-hyaline,  the 
blood  and  lymph  vessels  were  prominent  in  the  center  of  the  transplant  and 
marked  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  lacking. 

While  the  reactions  in  transplantations  between  different  races  in  rats 
varied  in  intensity  in  individual  cases,  they  still  fell  within  that  part  of  the 
spectrum  of  reactions  which  characterizes  homoiogenous  relationship ;  but 
within  the  homoiogenous  range  of  the  spectrum  they  were  situated  at  the 
end  farthest  removed  from  autogenous  relationship.  Notwithstanding  the  con- 
siderable degree  of  individual  variations  in  the  intensity  of  the  reactions,  the 
best  grades  attained  in  the  interracial  series  did  not  equal  the  highest  grades 
reached  in  typical  homoiotransplantations ;  but  there  is  no  sharp  break  in 
these  cases  between  the  character  of  homoiotransplantations  and  of  inter- 
racial transplantations,  such  as  is  found  if  we  pass  from  homoiogenous  or 
interracial  transplantations  to  transplantations  between  nearly  related  mam- 
malian species. 

In  a  former  smaller  series  VI  in  which  thyroid,  cartilage,  fat  tissue 
and  bone  were  transplanted  from  white  rats  to  cream  or  hooded  rats  and  the 
examination  took  place  after  the  grafts  had  been  kept  in  the  host  for  20  and 
21  days,  the  transplants  of  the  thyroid  gland  were  all  destroyed  or  only  a  few 
acini  were  found,  and  these  were  compressed  by  connective  tissue  and  in 
process  of  destruction  by  lymphocytes;  likewise  in  the  fibrous  tissue  as  well, 
that  had  replaced  the  destroyed  thyroid,  there  was  still  some  lymphocytic  in- 
filtration. In  the  cartilage  transplants  the  fat  tissue  was  infiltrated  or  mostly  re- 
placed by  fibrous  tissue  and  there  were  variable  amounts  of  lymphocytic  infil- 
tration. Perichondria!  regeneration  of  cartilage  around  necrotic  cartilage  was 


134  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

only  rarely  seen.  If  we  use  the  second  type  of  grades,  the  average  grades  in 
these  two  last  named  series  was  1.75  and  1.5,  respectively.  In  ordinary  trans- 
plantations among  white  rats,  carried  out  at  the  same  time,  the  average  reaction 
was  2.8.  In  this  series  of  interracial  transplantations,  also,  there  was  a  corre- 
spondence between  the  degree  of  genetic  relationship  between  donor  and  host 
and  the  degree  of  the  reactions  against  the  transplants.  Regeneration  of 
cartilage  by  perichondrium  was  inhibited,  but  not  entirely  prevented.  The  bone 
marrow  became  necrotic  and  was  replaced  by  fibrous  tissue  at  an  early  date, 
while  in  homoio-  and  syngenesiotransplantations  the  marrow  could  remain 
preserved  for  a  longer  time;  in  agreement  with  the  findings  in  other  experi- 
ments, cartilage  remained  as  a  .rule  preserved,  at  least  in  part. 

In  series  VII  in  the  mouse,  we  carried  out  transplantations  of  thyroid, 
cartilage  and  fat  tissue  from  wild  gray  mice  to  mice  belonging  to  the  inbred 
A  and  Old  Buffalo  strains.  In  general,  the  results  corresponded  to  homoio- 
genous  reactions,  which  were  more  severe  in  the  series  in  which  Old  Buffalo 
mice  were  the  hosts.  In  this  series  the  thyroid  transplant  had  been  destroyed 
in  animals  examined  later  than  12  days.  In  the  fat  tisssue  there  was  more  and 
more  ingrowth  of  connective  tissue,  as  well  as  of  vacuolated  phagocytes,  and 
after  16  and  25  days  there  was  much  infiltration  with  lymphocytes.  In  the 
mice  from  the  A  strain  the  thyroid  was  present  up  to  20  days,  but  it  was 
stunted  or  incomplete  and  the  organization  of  the  necrotic  center  proceeded 
only  slowly.  Here,  also,  more  and  more  connective  tissue  and  vacuolated  cells 
grew  into  the  fat  tissue,  and,  in  some  cases,  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was 
quite  marked.  The  transplanted  bone  marrow  became  replaced  by  connective 
tissue  in  all  instances.  However,  in  several  animals  some  muscle  fibers  with 
nuclear  chains  were  found  in  both  strains  of  mice.  There  is,  then,  no  sharp 
demarcation  between  these  experiments  and  others  in  which  homoiogenous 
tissues  elicited  severe  reactions;  the  grades  varied  between  2—  and  1,  and  the 
latter  grade  was  obtained  in  the  mice  examined  at  the  later  dates.  On  the 
whole,  there  was  a  remarkable  correspondence  in  the  reactions  against  differ- 
ent tissues  from  the  same  donor  in  the  same  host.  This  applies  to  all  of  these 
transplantations  and  it  comes  out  clearly,  for  instance,  in  series  III,  the 
intraracial  transplantations.  Polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  were  not  found, 
as  a  rule,  in  these  experiments ;  if  seen  at  all,  they  appeared  especially  in  the 
fat  tissue. 

The  main  result  which  emerges  from  these  investigations  is,  then,  the  dem- 
onstration that  the  reactions  against  tissues  from  different  races  or  subspecies 
correspond  to  very  severe  homoiogenous  reactions,  and  that  they  differ  from 
heterogenous  reactions  in  several  respects.  Furthermore,  inasmuch  as  the  race, 
Curly  Coat,  differs  from  Gray  Norway  in  one  single  mutation,  it  may  be  con- 
cluded that  such  a  mutation  may  have  a  definite  effect  on  the  individuality 
differential. 

If  we  compare  these  transplantations  between  individuals  belonging  to 
different  races  with  those  in  which  donor  and  host  belong  to  different  species, 
the  grades  applied  do  not  completely  correspond  to  each  other.  This  is  par- 
ticularly true  of  grade  1,  the  severest  grade.  In  both  of  these  types  of  trans- 


EXCHANGE  OF  TISSUES  BETWEEN  VARIETIES         135 

plantation,  grade  1  signifies  the  complete  destruction  of  a  tissue  of  medium 
sensitiveness,  such  as  the  thyroid  gland,  and  the  complete  or  at  least  very- 
extensive  substitution  of  fat  tissue  by  fibrous  tissue,  the  cartilage  being  pre- 
served entirely  or  in  part.  But  while  in  heterotransplantation  the  tissues  are 
injured  to  such  an  extent  that  regenerative  growth  does  not  as  a  rule  occur, 
this  may  take  place  in  interracial  transplantation.  The  reactions  designated 
by  grade  1  have,  thus,  a  certain  latitude,  signifying  both  the  less  severe  and 
the  very  severe  injury  inflicted,  respectively,  by  interracial  and  by  interspecies 
(hetero)  transplantations. 


Chapter   12 

The  Problems  and  the  Criteria  of  Success  or 

Failure  in  Transplantation  of 

Tissues  and  Organs 

jk  fter  having  stated  the  principal  experimental  data  relating  to  the  in- 
l\  dividuality  and  species  differentials  in  higher  organisms,  obtained  by 
jl  JL  means  of  transplantation  of  tissues,  we  shall  now  add  some  brief 
considerations  concerning  various  problems  which  arose  in  the  course  of  these 
investigations  and  the  criteria  of  success  or  failure  used  in  the  evaluation  of 
such  experiments  by  various  authors. 

In  the  later  period  of  the  last,  and  at  the  beginning  of  this  century,  it  was 
noted  by  some  clinicians  and  pathologists  that  autotransplantations  of  certain 
organs  may  succeed  better  than  transplantations  into  other  animals  belonging 
to  the  same  species.  Thus  Knauer,  Ribbert  and  others  obtained  more  favorable 
results  after  autogenous  than  after  homoiogenous  transplantations  of  the 
ovaries,  but  Ribbert  believed  that  in  some  instances  also  homoiotransplanta- 
tions  of  organs  may  succeed.  We  found  that  tumors  could  be  successfully  auto- 
transplanted  in  cases  in  which  homoiotransplantations  failed.  We  carried  out 
successful  autotransplantations  of  pigmented  skin  in  guinea  pigs  into  defects 
in  white  skin,  but  Carnot  and  Deflandres,  who  had  obtained  similar  results, 
thought  that  homoiotransplantations  succeeded  equally  well.  However,  Sale 
who  compared  the  results  of  auto-  and  homoiotransplantations  of  pigmented 
skin  in  the  guinea  pig  in  our  laboratory  found  that  only  autogenous  transplants 
healed  in  permanently  while  homoiogenous  grafts  were  as  a  rule  cast  off  after 
some  time  and  that  during  this  preliminary  period  lymphocytes  collected  under- 
neath the  transplant.  Christiani  (1900-1905)  believed  that  the  thyroid  gland 
in  various  species  can  be  transplanted  successfully  into  the  same  animal,  as 
well  as  into  other  animals  of  the  same  species,  and  even  into  different  races 
and  varieties.  Yet,  the  experimental  immunological  and  serological  studies, 
which  began  to  develop  actively  during  this  period,  had  already  exerted  a 
certain  influence  on  the  interpretation  of  experiments  in  transplantation,  and, 
accordingly,  Christiani  noted  that  transplantation  into  different  families,  or- 
ders and  classes  of  animals  did  not  succeed,  with  the  exception  of  transplanta- 
tions between  guinea  pig  and  rabbit,  which  were  successful.  But,  some- 
what later  it  was  more  generally  recognized  that  homoiotransplants  of  organs 
did  not,  as  a  rule,  survive.  Halsted,  for  instance,  obtained  negative  results 
with  homoiotransplantation  of  parathyroid  in  dogs.  In  many  cases  at  this  time 
and  also  for  some  time  afterwards,  investigators  did  not  definitely  distinguish 
between  homoio-  and  syngenesiotransplantation,  although  in  other  cases  such 
a  distinction  was  made,  as  for  instance,  by  Goodale,  who  carried  out  ovarian 

136 


CRITERIA  OF  SUCCESS  OR  FAILURE  137 

transplantations  in  fowl.  But  in  all  these  experiments,  as  well  as  in  subsequent 
ones,  the  principal  problem  was  the  study  of  the  conditions  which  permit 
successful  transplantation  and  of  those  which  prevent  it.  However,  a  second 
problem  soon  became  prominent:  transplantations  of  organs  with  internal 
secretion  were  used  also  in  order  to  determine  the  effects  of  certain  hormones 
on  the  growth  and  functions  of  various  tissues  and  organs.  As  examples  of 
transplantations  of  the  latter  kind,  the  experiments  of  Steinach  on  the  fem- 
inization of  male  guinea  pigs  and  rats,  by  implantation  of  ovaries  into  cas- 
trated males,  and  on  the  masculinization  of  female  guinea  pigs  by  the  grafting 
of  testes,  and  those  of  C.  A.  Pfeiffer  on  the  effect  of  transplantation  of  testes 
on  the  endocrine  function  of  the  anterior  pituitary  gland  may  be  mentioned. 
Both  of  these  investigators  carried  out  transplantations  into  litter  mates  and 
into  very  young  animals.  Steinach  used  castrated  guinea  pigs,  and  Pfeiffer, 
non-castrated  rats,  as  hosts.  In  the  latter  experiments,  the  proportion  of 
testicles  in  which  the  tubules  survived  was  relatively  great.  In  both  series  of 
investigations  we  have  therefore  to  deal  with  syngenesio-  rather  than  with 
homoiotransplantations.  The  analysis  of  individuality  was  not  the  principal 
objective  in  the  large  majority  of  these  experiments.  A  further  consideration 
of  all  the  numerous  experiments  in  transplantations  which  have  been  made 
during  the  last  fifty  or  sixty  years  would  therefore  not  contribute  much  to  a 
fruitful  analysis  of  individuality,  and  it  is  not  needed  because  resumes  of 
these  investigations  have  already  been  given  by  various  authors. 

However,  we  shall  here  attempt,  if  possible,  to  find  the  main  factors  which 
caused  the  differences  in  the  results  in  transplantations  of  tissues  obtained  by 
various  investigators,  and  in  particular  the  differences  in  their  interpretation 
of  these  results.  One  of  the  principal  differences  concerns  the  question  as  to 
whether  transplants  may  survive  after  homoiotransplantation,  and  whether 
they  survive  as  well  after  homoiotransplantation  as  after  autotransplantation. 
As  already  mentioned,  especially  in  earlier  investigations  the  view  is  fre- 
quently expressed  that  various  homoiotransplanted  tissues  or  organs  survive 
as  well  as  autotransplanted  ones ;  but  this  view  occurs  also  even  in  the  more 
recent  literature.  This  may  be  due  (1)  to  the  lack  of  differentiation  between 
real  homoiogenous  and  syngenesious  transplantations,  the  latter  succeeding 
better  than  the  former;  (2)  to  the  disregard  of  the  age  of  the  transplants;  it 
seems  that  organs  from  newborn  donors  can  be  more  readily  transplanted  than 
organs  from  older  donors,  and  likewise,  that  the  reactions  may  be  milder  after 
transplantations  into  very  young  than  into  older  hosts;  (3)  often  to  the  lack 
of  a  complete  microscopical  examination  of  the  transplants.  The  smaller 
transplants  should  be  cut  into  serial  sections  and  many  sections  should  be 
available  for  study  from  the  larger  transplants.  It  is  necessary  that  all  im- 
portant stages,  from  the  beginning  of  transplantation  until  the  reaction  is 
definite,  be  examined  in  succession,  and  that  the  various  modes  of  reactions 
on  the  part  of  the  host — cellular  as  well  as  bodyfluid  reactions — be  considered 
and  evaluated  in  as  quantitative  a  manner  as  possible;  and  lastly,  it  is  im- 
portant, if  there  is  a  limit  to  the  periods  when  examinations  can  be  made,  that 
such  stages  be  selected  as  would  permit  the  recognition  of  the  presence  of 


138  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

intermediate  stages  between  success  and  complete  failure  of  transplantation. 
If  too  late  a  stage  is  chosen  for  examination,  the  impression  of  an  all  or 
nothing  result  is  obtained,  when  actually  intermediate  stages  of  reaction  exist. 
The  different  degrees  to  which  these  rules  were  adhered  to  can  explain,  for 
instance,  differences  between  the  conclusions  at  which  Little  and  Bittner 
arrived,  and  those  obtained  by  us.  In  contrast  to  the  findings  of  some  other 
investigators,  in  the  experiments  of  Appel,  who  made  careful  studies  of  the 
intermediate  stages  in  the  reactions  and  who  considered  also  the  cellular 
response  of  the  host,  the  quantitative  differences  between  the  results  ob- 
tained in  syngenesio-  and  autotransplantations  of  testes  in  fowl  came  out 
very  clearly.  Likewise  Perthes,  in  careful  experiments  on  skin  grafting  in 
man,  had  noted  the  difference  between  the  results  of  autogenous  and  syn- 
genesiotransplantation,  the  marked  advantage  of  the  former  over  the  latter 
being  quite  definite.  In  these  investigations  the  same  host  was  used  for  both 
types  of  transplants  and  the  experiments  were  made  at  the  same  time; 
in  addition,  multiple  grafts  were  used  and  the  method  of  transplantation 
being  the  same  in  each  case,  variable  factors  were  excluded  as  much  as  possi- 
ble. The  results  agree  with  those  in  our  experiments  in  non-inbred  animals, 
which  show  that  the  reaction  against  syngenesiotransplants  resembles  much 
more  closely  that  noted  in  homoiogenous  than  that  in  autogenous  transplanta- 
tions. It  is  also  possible,  in  certain  cases,  to  determine  in  an  approximately 
quantitative  manner  the  differences  in  the  outcome  of  transplantations  by 
making  a  large  series  of  skin  grafts  into  many  hosts,  which  are  alike  in  all 
but  a  single  distinctive  factor.  In  this  manner,  valid  conclusions  may  be  drawn 
by  means  of  the  statistical  method,  even  without  the  aid  of  microscopic  ex- 
aminations ;  as  an  example  of  this  kind  of  experiments,  we  might  refer  to  the 
investigation  of  Kozelka  in  fowl. 

In  some  instances  the  differences  between  the  results  obtained  by  various 
investigators  are  apparent  only  and  do  not  really  exist.  -Thus,  from  the  ex- 
periments of  Browman  the  impression  might  be  obtained  that  heterotransplan- 
tation of  testicles  in  mice  and  rats  may  succeed  to  a  limited  extent,  although 
it  is  in  fact  always  negative.  This  interpretation  was  given  because  the  author 
accentuates  the  staining  of  central  portions  of  the  testicular  graft,  which  may 
sometimes  be  observed,  in  contrast  to  the  peripheral  portions,  which  are  en- 
tirely necrotic.  In  the  case  of  a  successful  graft,  it  is  the  peripheral  parts 
which  live,  while  the  central  parts  die.  We  have  observed  similar  specimens  in 
which  apparently  the  central  parts  survived.  These  findings  seem  to  be 
due  to  the  fact  that  the  heterotoxins  act  first  on  the  periphery  of  the  trans- 
plants, which  latter,  as  a  result,  are  destroyed ;  the  central  parts  being  with- 
out nourishment,  have  already  died  and  no  longer  function,  but  they  have 
retained  some  of  their  staining  characteristics.  Browman  himself  recognized, 
through  functional  endocrine  tests,  that  these  central  parts  did  not  exert  any 
vital  activities. 

The  experiments  of  Richter  and  Jaffe  on  transplantations  of  thymus  into 
bone  marrow  and  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue,  and  of  lymph  glands  into  the 
latter  area,  are  of  interest  because  they  contribute  a  further  example  of  the 


CRITERIA  OF  SUCCESS  OR  FAILURE  139 

gradual  destruction  of  autogenous  tissue  under  certain  unfavorable  condi- 
tions. Autogenous  transplants  of  thymus  may  remain  permanently  preserved 
in  the  subcutaneous  tissue.  Here,  at  first,  it  is  mainly  the  reticular  tissue  which 
withstands  the  injury  of  transplantation;  but  other  cells  which  soon  after 
transplantation  degenerate,  subsequently  regenerate.  In  a  first  stage,  these 
processes  occur  in  transplants  also  in  the  bone  marrow ;  however  in  the  latter 
location  the  preservation  of  the  grafts  is  merely  temporary,  because  the  bony 
capsule  which,  after  some  time,  surrounds  them,  interferes  with  their  proper 
nourishment ;  they  then  atrophy  and  a  gradual  absorption  of  the  thymus  tissue 
takes  place.  We  have  previously  discussed  another  example  of  destruction  of 
autogenous  skin  transplants,  due  to  the  ingrowth  of  the  host  connective  tissue 
into  the  epidermal  cyst,  especially  along  channels  prepared  by  hairs  devoid  of 
complete  epithelial  covering.  In  this  way,  secondary  factors  not  connected 
with  the  individuality  differentials  may  determine  the  fate  of  transplants,  as 
do  under  some  circumstances,  growth  stimuli,  such  as  those  of  certain  hor- 
mones, acting  on  a  transplant,  which  may  to  some  extent  counteract  more  or 
less  accidental,  injurious  factors,  as  well  as  other  unfavorable  conditions. 

The  experiments  of  Marine  and  Manley,  in  which  they  compared  auto- 
genous and  homoiogenous  transplantations  of  various  organs  in  the  rabbit,  are 
of  interest  because  they  confirm  not  only  the  fact  that  usually  the  destruction 
of  homoiogenous  tissues  takes  place  wifhin  20  to  30  days,  but  also  because 
they  show  that  in  some  rare  cases  such  tissues  may  remain  alive  for  longer 
periods.  Still,  their  experiments  did  not  reveal  the  existence  of  the  finer 
differences  in  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  transplants,  in  accordance 
with  the  relations  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor.  These 
authors  recognize  the  relatively  great  power  of  resistance  of  lipoid  cells  in 
ovary  and  adrenal  gland,  but  they  underestimate  the  injury  which  lympho- 
cytes can  inflict  on  the  transplant.  However,  the  injurious  effects  exerted  by 
lymphocytes  differ  much  under  different  circumstances,  as  the  experiments 
which  we  have  already  reported  show.  As  to  the  causes  of  the  unfavorable 
results  of  homoiotransplantation,  Marine  and  Manley  attribute  them  to  the 
antigenic  properties  of  the  transplants;  and  the  differences  in  the  power 
of  resistance  of  various  organs  following  transplantation  they  apparently  re- 
gard as  being  due  to  the  differences  in  the  antigenic  capacities  of  different 
tissues.  Their  conclusions  were  based  not  only  on  theoretical  grounds  but 
also  on  the  results  of  successive  transplantations,  in  which  they  found  that 
a  second  homoiotransplant  is  always  more  rapidly  destroyed  than  a  first  one. 
However,  these  observations  and  interpretations  are  not  in  accord  with  our 
own,  as  we  shall  discuss  still  further  in  a  subsequent  chapter. 


Chapter  I  J 

The  Effects  of  Various  Extraneous  Factors  on  the 
Activity  of  the  Organismal  Differentials 

The  reactions  of  hosts  against  transplants  possessing  individuality 
differentials  which  show  various  and  graded  degrees  of  similarity 
or  difference  from  those  of  the  hosts,  have  been  described;  also 
the  differences  in  the  reactions  noted  in  different  kinds  of  tissues,  these  dif- 
ferences depending  upon  an  interaction  between  tissue  differentials  and  in- 
dividuality differentials.  Furthermore  the  differences  in  the  action  of  hosts 
belonging  to  different  species  have  also  been  analyzed  and  we  have  seen 
that  such  species  differences  may  affect  the  reactions  which  take  place  in  the 
host  against  strange  individuality  differentials.  In  the  course  of  these  discus- 
sions, various  problems  of  wider  biological  significance  have  been  intro- 
duced and  these  will  now  receive  further  consideration. 

(I)  The  interaction  between  tissues  possessing  different  individuality  dif- 
ferentials, and  the  interaction  between  tissues  possessing  the  same  individuality 
differentials  but  different  tissue  differentials.  We  have  seen  that  organisms 
react  against  strange  individuality  differentials  by  means  of  their  bodyfluids 
as  well  as  of  certain  cells  and  tissues,  or  the  latter  may  be  the  predominant 
reacting  agents.  The  reaction  of  the  bodyfluids  is  the  more  specific  one  of 
these  two  types.  The  tissue  reactions  as  such  are  not  entirely  specific,  but 
they  may  become  so  if  we  take  into  account  also  the  quantitative  factors  in 
their  activity,  in  particular  the  intensity  and  time  of  their  action,  and  also  the 
interaction  between  different  types  of  tissues  and  cells  involved.  The  con- 
nective tissue  in  general  reacts  very  readily  against  various  kinds  of  changes 
in  its  environment.  It  reacts  wherever  cells  and  tissues  in  the  neighboring 
area  are  injured  or  killed;  also  against  dead  foreign  bodies  and  it  is  influenced 
in  its  behavior  by  variations  in  the  activity  of  neighboring  epithelial  structures ; 
but  in  addition,  connective  tissue  reacts  very  finely  to  differences  in  the 
individuality  differentials  in  the  adjoining  tissues,  discerning  here  the  slight- 
est differences  and  responding  in  accordance  with  a  definite  time  curve.  With 
advancing  age  the  connective  tissue  stroma  undergoes  changes  similar  to 
those  induced  by  strange  individuality  differentials.  The  lymphocytes  too  re- 
act primarily  in  a  non-specific  manner  against  foreign  bodies  and  against 
injured  tissues,  provided  these  changes  do  not  exceed  a  certain  intensity. 
It  is  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  which  are  activated  whenever  acute 
changes  of  a  relatively  great  intensity  occur ;  these  cells  become  prominent  as 
soon  as  the  difference  between  organismal  differentials  has  attained  such  a 
degree  that  the  tissues  are  markedly  injured,  as,  for  instance,  when  tissues 
possessing  different  species  differentials  adjoin  each  other,  or  when  species 

140 


EFFECTS  OF  VARIOUS  EXTRANEOUS  FACTORS    141 

differential  substances  are  given  off  into  the  circulation.  Blood  vessels  re- 
spond to  changes  in  the  environment  in  certain  respects  similarly  to  the  con- 
nective tissue.  With  the  latter,  they  move  into  necrotic  tissue  or  into  foreign 
bodies  soft  enough  to  permit  penetration  by  capillaries.  But  while  the  con- 
nective tissue  is  stimulated  more  by  homoiogenous  than  by  autogenous  dif- 
ferentials, the  blood  capillaries  are  inhibited  by  the  former  and  attracted 
more  actively  by  the  latter.  On  the  other  hand,  contact  with  autogenous  tissue 
tends  to  prevent  the  change  of  cellular  connective  tissue  into  fibrous  tissue. 

However,  tissue  reactions  can  occur  also  between  adjoining  tissues  of  autog- 
enous constitution  and  these  reactions  may  be  altered  if  a  homoiogenous, 
takes  the  place  of  the  autogenous  differential.  Thus  we  have  referred  to  the 
changes  which  are  seen  when  pigmented  skin  is  autotransplanted  into  de- 
fects in  white  skin  in  the  guinea  pig,  or  conversely,  if  white  skin  is  trans- 
planted into  a  defect  in  pigmented  skin;  the  pigmented  epidermis  grows 
into  the  unpigmented  epidermis  and  this  process  continues  for  a  cer- 
tain time  until  new  boundaries  are  produced  between  these  tissues.  In  the 
normal  quiescent  state  of  the  tissues,  each  adjoins  the  other  without  re- 
action; but  whenever  a  tissue  disturbance  takes  place,  such  as  is  caused 
by  the  injury  connected  with  transplantation,  a  struggle  ensues  between 
the  two  adjacent  types  of  epithelium.  The  pigmented  epidermis  is  the  stronger 
one,  but  under  normal  conditions  its  superiority  is  merely  potential ;  it  be- 
comes activated  under  certain  conditions  which  disturb  the  tissue  equilib- 
rium, and  then  a  reaction  occurs  against  tissue  elements  possessing  the  same 
individuality  differentials.  If  a  syngenesio-  or  a  homoiogenous  differential 
takes  the  place  of  the  autogenous  differential,  this  reaction  is  suppressed 
The  strange  individuality  differentials  injure  the  tissue  metabolism,  as  indi- 
cated by  the  loss  of  pigment,  which  may  occur  in  homoiogenous  or  syngenesi- 
ous  pigmented  epidermis.  The  degree  of  inferiority  of  the  unpigmented 
epidermis  and  the  mode  of  reaction  of  the  tissues  towards  each  other,  if  dis- 
turbances take  place,  may  vary  in  different  species,  even  in  nearly  related 
ones.  In  some  instances,  changes  in  the  tissue  equilibrium  between  pigmented 
and  white  skin  in  the  guinea  pig  may  apparently  arise  spontaneously  in  non- 
transplanted  skin.  Such  an  effect  was  observed  by  Saxton,  Schmeckebier  and 
Kelley,  presumably  under  conditions  in  which  a  disturbance  of  the  tissue 
equilibrium  was  due  to  some  hidden  metabolic  change. 

As  stated,  the  reactions  above  described  were  found  in  the  guinea  pig. 
In  the  mouse,  the  transplanted  pigmented  skin  does  not  extend  into  the 
adjacent  tissue,  probably  because  the  chromatophores  here  are  not  epidermal. 
Also,  in  the  tadpole  conditions  are,  in  certain  respects,  different.  Thus  Rand 
and  Pierce  noted  that  while  white  transplants  of  ventral  tadpole  skin  to  pig- 
mented dorsal  skin  were  invaded  by  the  adjoining  pigmented  host  epidermis, 
this  could  occur  in  autogenous  as  well  as  in  homoiogenous  transplants,  yet, 
an  individuality  differential  was  also  involved  in  this  reaction,  as  is  indicated 
by  the  fact  that  in  many  instances  in  autogenous  grafts  the  desequilibration 
was  not  sufficient  to  cause  an  invasion.  An  injury  by  homoiotoxins  may  then 
have  to  be  added,  in  order  to  overcome  the  inertia  of  the  pigmented  epidermis 


142  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  to  make  its  potential  superiority  actual.  In  adult  rana  pipiens,  after 
transplantation  of  autogenous  white  skin  to  a  pigmented  dorsal  area,  no 
change  in  the  condition  of  the  transplant  takes  place,  but  following  homoio- 
transplantation,  the  pigmented  epidermis  invades  the  white  epidermis  after 
about  two  weeks  (H.  H.  Vogel). 

A  related  process  may  take  place  at  the  border  between  the  squamous 
epithelium  of  the  cervix  and  the  cylindrical  epithelium  of  the  uterine  horns. 
This  is  especially  noticeable  in  the  mouse  under  the  influence  of  stimulation 
of  the  vagina-cervix-uterus  by  estrogen.  Under  these  conditions  the  squa- 
mous epithelium  dominates  over  the  cylindrical  epithelium  and  begins  to  in- 
vade and  replace  it ;  it  may  also  push  into  uterine  gland  ducts  and  here  un- 
dermine or  exert  pressure  on  the  cylindrical  epithelium.  This  invasion  may 
extend  to  various  distances.  There  are  indications  that  such  changes  may  take 
place  to  a  slight  extent  even  without  the  hormone  stimulation,  but  it  is  the 
latter  which  greatly  intensifies  the  potential  superiority  of  the  squamous  epi- 
thelium of  the  cervix  over  the  cylindrical  epithelium  of  the  uterus. 

In  certain  respects,  also,  cancerous  growth  may  be  considered  as  a  related 
phenomenon.  In  this  condition  one  tissue,  as  a  result  of  long-continued  stim- 
ulation, gains  the  ascendancy  over  adjoining  tissues  of  the  same  or  of  a 
different  kind  and  then  begins  to  invade  them.  But  in  cancer  such  a  change  is 
not  temporary,  as  in  the  examples  previously  mentioned;  it  is  a  permanent 
change,  leading  ultimately  to  the  destruction  of  the  whole  organism.  The 
mode  of  stimulation  of  one  tissue  which  brings  about  this  result  in  cancer 
may  be  of  various  kinds,  but  this  is  the  less  important  factor ;  it  is  the  reac- 
tion of  the  stimulated  tissue  which  is  characteristic.  Thus  we  may  conceive 
of  an  organism  as  an  equilibrized  system,  composed  of  many  mosaic  parts, 
which  function  in  harmony  with  one  another.  Various  kinds  of  changes  may 
disturb  their  equilibrium  and  then  a  potential  tissue  superiority  may  become 
actual.  Tissue  differentials,  without  the  co-operation  of  individuality  dif- 
ferentials, may  condition  such  disharmonious  reactions,  but  antagonistic,  dis- 
equilibrizing  reactions  may  be  induced  also  by  individuality  differentials, 
and  in  some  cases  they  are  brought  about  by  an  interaction  between  tissue 
and  individuality  differentials. 


Chapter  I//. 
Hormones  and  Individuality  Differentials 

The  organism  is  an  approximately  equilibrized  mechanism  in  which 
the  maintenance  of  the  structural  autonomy  of  the  various  parts  and 
the  integrity  of  the  whole  organism  depend  upon  the  inherited  char- 
acteristics inherent  in  these  parts,  in  particular  upon  the  nature  of  the  inter- 
acting tissues  and  their  individuality  differentials;  furthermore  upon  their 
state  of  sensitization,  and  upon  the  degree  of  stimulation  these  structural 
units  receive  especially  by  hormones.  Interaction  of  all  these  factors  with  one 
another  takes  place,  including  the  interaction  between  individuality  differ- 
entials and  the  hormones,  and  it  is  this  last  type  of  interaction  which  is  of 
interest  also  in  our  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials.  In  this  interac- 
tion the  endocrine  function  may  be  considered  as  the  primary  factor  and  we 
may  inquire  how  this  function  would  be  affected  by  changes  in  the  individual- 
ity differentials,  or,  on  the  other  hand,  .the  individuality  differentials  may  be 
considered  as  the  primary  factor  and  we  may  inquire  into  the  effect  which 
changes  in  hormone  action  may  have  on  the  activity  and  efficiency  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials,  especially  under  conditions  in  which  two  different 
individuality  differentials  oppose  each  other. 

Hormones  as  such,  within  a  wide  range  of  their  action  do  not  possess  in- 
dividuality differentials  and  are  independent  of  the  latter,  but  the  organs 
in  which  they  are  produced  and  the  tissues  upon  which  they  act  carry  these 
differentials,  and  the  new  formation  of  tissues  which  takes  place  as  the 
result  of  the  function  of  certain  hormones,  may  be  greatly  influenced  by  the 
nature  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  these  tissues  and  organs;  these 
effects  may  be  unfavorably  affected  by  the  presence  of  other  than  autogenous 
individuality  differentials.  Thus  we  have  seen  that  the  formation  of  placento- 
mata,  which  is  controlled  by  the  interaction  between  the  corpus  luteum  hor- 
mone and  mechanical  stimulation,  requires  the  presence  of  autogenous  in- 
dividuality differentials  if  the  maximum  effects  are  to  be  achieved,  whereas, 
the  presence  of  a  homoiogenous  differential  has  an  inhibiting  action  on  such 
processes.  Likewise,  the  grafts  of  endocrine  glands,  such  as  ovaries  and  thy- 
roid, develop  and  function  best  in  a  perfect  autogenous  environment. 

On  the  other  hand,  under  some  conditions  the  presence  or  absence  of  cer- 
tain hormones  may  affect  the  function  and  growth  of  organs  and  tissues  in  an 
environment  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  are  not  entirely  adequate  ; 
or  the  action  of  hormones,  also,  may  be  of  significance  even  in  the  survival  of 
autogenous  transplants.  However,  in  this  respect  different  organs  seem  to 
differ  as  to  the  degree  to  which  they  are  influenced  by  the  activity  of  certain 
hormones.  In  the  organs  which  we  have  studied,  the  ability  of  hormones  to 
prevent  altogether  the  injurious  effects  of  not  quite  adequate  individuality 

143 


144  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

differentials  was  not  very  striking;  if  such  power  existed  at  all,  it  was 
usually  slight  and  in  other  cases  it  was  lacking.  Thus  we  observed  that  if 
ovaries  were  transplanted  in  certain  inbred  strains  of  mice,  the  unfavorable 
effects  of  relatively  slight  deviations  from  the  optimum  conditions  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  could  to  some  extent  be  remedied  by  using  ovariec- 
tomized  or  castrated  hosts;  but  in  other  strains,  these  improvements,  due  to 
the  removal  of  the  hormones  secreted  by  the  sex  glands  of  the  host,  were 
lacking ;  in  no  instance  were  the  effects  very  striking.  We  saw,  furthermore, 
that  multiple  transplantations  of  anterior  hypophysis  succeeded  in  mice  in 
which   the  host's  own  hypophysis  was   present  and   functioning,  and  that 
these  transplants  could  exert  certain  hormonal  functions  and  remain  alive  for 
considerable  periods  of  time.  This  result  was  obtained  in  cases  in  which  the 
disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor  was 
only  very  slight;  but  there  were  some  indications  that  when  the  differences 
between  individuality  differentials  were  greater,  the  transplants  did  not  long 
survive.  Likewise  in  experiments  with  thyroid  and  parathyroid  glands,  it  was 
possible  to  transplant  these  organs  successfully  into  hosts  whose  individuality 
differentials  differed  only  to  a  slight  degree,  without  first  removing  the  hosts' 
own  thyroid  and  parathyroid  glands,  and  even  several  glands  transplanted 
simultaneously  in  such  hosts  could  survive.  In  the  case  of  the  adrenal  gland 
of  the  mouse,  such  transplants  degenerated  to  a  large  extent;  but  in  many 
instances  some  part  of  the  cortex  survived  for  a  long  time  if  there  was  no 
marked  disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor. 
It  is  possible  to  test  the  interaction  between  endocrine  effects  and  individ- 
uality differentials  in  still  another  way,  namely,  by  experimental  administra- 
tion to  the  host  of  an  excess  of  certain  hormones,  in  order  to  determine 
whether  this  counteracts  or  accentuates  the  effects  of  not  quite  adequate  in- 
dividuality differentials.  Christiani,  it  seems,  was  the  first  to  express  the  opin- 
ion that  the  need  of  thyroid  tissue  on  the  part  of  the  host  organism  deter- 
mined the  fate  of  the  thyroid  transplants.  In  thyroidectomized  animals  the 
grafts  healed  in  better  than  in  those  possessing  their  own  thyroids.  On  the 
other  hand,  administration  of  thyroid  substance  caused  an  atrophy  of  the 
thyroid  transplants.  We  were  unable  to  observe  any  marked  effect  of  the  oral 
administration  of  thyroid  tablets  on  the  fate  of  thyroid  transplants;  it  cer- 
tainly did  not  prevent  their  survival   in  transplantations  which  otherwise 
would  have  been  successful.  At  most,  this  procedure  may  perhaps  have  re- 
duced the  functional  and  mitotic  activity  of  the  thyroid  transplant,  as  well 
as  that  of  the  host's  thyroid,  without,  however,  interfering  very  noticeably 
with  the  action  of  the  individuality  differentials,  which  latter  determined 
essentially  the  success  or  lack  of  success  of  these  transplantations. 

Likewise,  Carroll  Smith  did  not  notice  that  administration  of  potassium 
iodide  had  any  marked  effect  on  the  fate  of  autogenous  or  homoiogenous 
thyroid  transplants  in  guinea  pigs.  Also,  experiments  in  which  injections  of 
extracts  of  cattle  anterior  pituitary  were  made  into  guinea  pigs  carrying 
thyroid  transplants  should  have  some  bearing  on  this  problem.  Such  extracts 
contain  the  hormone  which  causes  a  very  marked  growth  and  functional 


HORMONES  AND  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      145 

stimulation  of  the  thyroid  gland  in  the  guinea  pig ;  they  should  therefore  pro- 
mote the  growth  of  thyroid  transplants  and  help  the  latter  to  overcome  the 
injurious  effects  which  a  disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  transplant  exert  on  the  survival  and  growth  of  the  latter.  How- 
ever, Martin  Silberberg,  who  carried  out  such  experiments,  noticed  that  the 
hypertrophy  of  the  transplanted  organ  is  less  readily  accomplished  than  that 
of  the  non-transplanted  thyroid  gland,  a  finding  with  which  our  own  is  in 
agreement  and  which  can  be  understood  if  we  consider  the  less  favorable 
circulatory  conditions  in  a  transplanted  organ  and  a  certain  inadequacy  in 
the  relations  between  stroma  and  transplanted  parenchyma  whenever  a  dis- 
harmony exists  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant. 
Silberberg  furthermore  made  the  interesting  observation  that  a  thyroid 
gland,  rendered  hypertrophic  previous  to  transplantation  by  injections  of 
anterior  pituitary  extracts,  can  be  less  readily  successfully  transplanted  than 
a  non-hypertrophic  gland.  Apparently  the  state  of  hypertrophy  corresponds 
to  an  increased  differentiation  of  the  tissue,  which  makes  the  organ  less 
resistant  to  the  injury  inflicted  during  the  process  of  grafting.  But  on  the 
whole,  this  investigator  found  favorable  effects  of  injections  of  anterior 
pituitary  extract  on  the  homoiogenous  thyroid  if  the  injections  were  begun 
after  the  thyroid  had  been  transferred  to  the  new  host.  However,  the  results  of 
the  experiments  of  Silberberg,  as  well  as  our  own  in  similar  experiments, 
showed  a  certain  variability,  and  on  the  whole,  in  the  large  majority  of  trans- 
plantations the  action  of  the  thyroid-stimulating  hormone  was  not  able  to 
overcome  the  unfavorable  results  of  homoiogenous  transplantation  of  the 
thyroid  gland  in  the  guinea  pig.  These  results  agree  with  those  of  Bayer  and 
Wense,  who  showed  that  injections  of  pregnancy  urine,  containing  prolan, 
did  not  exert  a  beneficial  effect  on  intra-ocular,  homoiogenous  transplants  of 
testicle  in  the  rabbit. 

There  is  another  condition  in  which  hormones  might  possibly  affect  the 
fate  of  the  transplant,  namely  pregnancy.  In  pregnant  guinea  pigs  the  reac- 
tions against  homoiogenous  transplants  of  thyroid,  cartilage  and  fat  tissue 
were  severe  in  the  majority  of  cases,  even  during  early  pregnancy  of  the  host, 
but  in  some  animals  the  reaction  was  relatively  mild.  It  was  conceivable  that 
pregnancy  exerts  its  effects  by  causing  undernourishment  of  the  transplants. 
However,  in  control  experiments,  in  which  young  guinea  pigs  with  an  initial 
weight  of  195-225  grams  were  underfed  for  a  period  of  18  days,  so  that  the 
end  weight  was  between  160-185  grams,  the  grades  of  the  homoiogenous 
thyroid  transplants  were  similar  to  those  in  well-fed  animals,  or  they  were 
even  somewhat  better  in  the  underfed  guinea  pigs. 

As  already  mentioned  on  the  basis  of  experiments  with  transplantations  of 
the  thyroid  gland,  Christiani  (1900-1905)  stated  that  an  endocrine  deficiency 
is  needed  for  the  successful  transplantation  of  an  endocrine  organ.  He  attrib- 
uted this  favorable  result  of  a  diminution  in  the  amount  of  the  endocrine 
organ,  in  particular  the  thyroid  present  in  the  host  to  the  improvement  in  the 
vascularization  of  the  graft  in  animals  deficient  in  the  production  of  the 
thyroid  hormone.  However,  he  actually  observed  merely  an  increased  size  and 


146  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

hyperemia  in  transplants  in  completely  thyroidectomized  hosts,  as  compared 
to  animals  in  which  a  part  of  their  own  thyroid  glands  had  been  left  intact. 
Haberer  and  Salzer  (1909),  in  rabbits,  and  more  recently,  Ingle  and  Cragy, 
in  rats,  likewise  noted  a  better  vascularization  and  better  growth  of  the  acini 
in  completely  thyroidectomized  animals  than  in  those  in  which  a  part  of  the 
thyroid  had  remained.  Halsted  (1909),  in  the  case  of  the  parathyroid  gland, 
found  in  dogs  a  better  growth  of  autogenous  parathyroids  in  animals  in  which 
their  own  glands  had  been  completely  extirpated ;  he  believed  that  an  endocrine 
deficiency  is  necessary  not  only  for  the  better  development,  but  also  for  the 
survival  of  an  autogenous  graft.  However,  this  opinion  is  based  apparently 
on  a  relatively  small  number  of  cases,  in  which  the  autogenous  parathyroid 
transplants  were  recovered  in  parathyroidectomized  dogs,  and  this  investiga- 
tor is  very  cautious  in  stating  his  conclusion. 

There  are,  however,  experiments  with  transplantation  of  other  endocrine 
organs,  in  which  the  effect  of  an  endocrine  deficiency  on  the  survival  of 
transplants  of  such  organs  is  greater.  Thus  the  experiments  on  the  grafting  of 
adrenal  cortex  by  Wyman  and  Turn  Suden,  by  Ingle,  Nilson,  Higgins  and 
Kendall,  as  well  as  those  of  Lux,  Higgins  and  Mann,  showed  that  successful 
transplantation  of  the  adrenal  cortex  depends,  in  the  first  place,  upon  the 
genetic  relationship  between  donor  and  host,  better  results  being  obtained  in 
inbred  rats  in  litter  mates  than  in  less  nearly  related  animals.  Furthermore, 
transplants  from  newborn  rats  are  more  favorable  than  those  from  older 
donors,  but  in  addition,  a  deficiency  in  adrenal  hormone  production  in  the 
host  stimulates  the  growth  of  the  transplanted  gland  very  much.  The  influence 
of  the  hormone  consists  primarily  in  an  enhancement  of  the  growth  processes 
in  the  transplant,  but  in  addition  there  is  strong  evidence  that  this  factor  may 
favor  also  the  survival  of  the  graft ;  and  again,  as  a  result  of  the  stimulation 
of  the  transplant  by  the  specific  hormone,  the  vascularization  of  the  graft  is 
improved. 

We  may  add  here  some  related  observations  concerning  the  influence  of 
hormones  on  the  transplantation  of  non-endocrine  organs.  In  our  earlier 
transplantations  of  the  uterus  in  various  stages  of  the  sexual  cycle  in  guinea 
pigs,  we  found  a  favorable  effect  of  hormones  given  off  by  the  host  on  the 
survival  of  the  transplanted  decidual  cells.  Jacobson,  in  autotransplanting  the 
endometrium  of  rabbits  into  the  pelvic  cavity,  observed  that  the  different 
periods  of  the  sexual  cycle  in  the  animal  may  affect  favorably  or  unfavorably 
the  fate  of  the  transplant  and  that  ovariectomy  carried  out  at  the  time  of  the 
transplantation  does  not  prevent  the  formation  of  endometrial  cysts,  but  that 
it  diminishes  the  size  of  the  cysts  and  the  thickness  of  their  walls.  Neumann 
noted  that  intra-peritoneal  autotransplantation  of  endometrium  succeeds  if 
the  animals  possess  their  own  ovaries,  but  that  it  is  unsuccessful  in  previously 
ovariectomized  rabbits,  which  indicates  that  the  atrophic  uterine  mucosa  can- 
not maintain  itself  in  the  host.  Likewise,  while  transplantation  of  the  uterine 
mucosa  into  sisters  is  successful,  it  does  not  succeed  in  brothers  for  the  same 
reason.  In  these  experiments  we  have  to  deal  chiefly  with  autotransplantation. 

Corresponding  investigations  concerning  autotransplantation  of  the  Fal- 


HORMONES  AND  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      147 

lopian  tube  in  rabbits  (Guerriero),  and  of  vagina  in  guinea  pigs  (Reynaud), 
show  that  stimulating  hormones  influence  here,  also,  the  growth  processes 
and  size  of  the  transplants,  without  being  needed,  however,  for  the  survival 
of  the  latter.  In  regard  to  the  transplantation  of  ovaries,  according  to  Lip- 
schiitz  the  total  number  of  preserved  follicles  in  the  transplants  is  greater  in 
ovariectomized  than  in  non-ovariectomized  animals,  an  effect  which  was  ob- 
served however  only  under  certain  conditions  and  not  as  a  general  rule  in  our 
experiments ;  moreover,  the  interaction  between  individuality  differentials 
and  hormones  were  not  considered  by  this  investigator.  Numerous  experi- 
ments have  demonstrated  the  effects  of  the  anterior  hypophysis  on  the  ovaries 
and  testicles,  demonstrating  the  significance  of  the  hormones  given  off  by  this 
organ  for  the  growth  and  for  the  functioning  of  various  constituents  of  the 
sex  glands,  and  these  influences  extend  also  to  the  transplanted  sex  glands 
(Engle,  Moore  and  Price,  Takewaki,  Bayer  and  Wense,  and  others).  If  we 
consider  the  results  of  these  investigations  as  well  as  of  our  own,  on  which 
we  have  already  reported,  and  those  of  Pfeiffer,  we  may  conclude  that  the 
following  conditions  are  involved  in  the  survival  and  growth  of  transplanted 
sex  glands:  (1)  The  relation  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  transplant  (genetic  factors)  ;  (2)  The  age  of  the  transplant;  the  trans- 
plantation of  the  sex  glands  of  newborn  animals  seems  to  succeed  better  than 
that  of  older  animals,  at  least  in  the  case  of  the  testes;  (3)  The  removal  of 
the  sex  glands  of  the  host;  this  favors,  in  the  first  place,  the  growth  and 
function  of  the  transplant,  and  it  may,  secondarily,  affect  also  its  survival ;  it 
seems  to  be  a  more  important  factor  when  the  hosts  are  older  animals ; 
(4)  Transplantation  to  the  opposite  sex ;  there  are  some  indications  that  under 
certain  circumstances  this  may  be  a  more  favorable  procedure  than  trans- 
plantation to  the  sex  of  the  donor.  The  order  in  which  these  factors  are  cited 
indicates  probably  also  their  relative  importance,  the  first  one  being  the  most 
important. 

The  following  are  the  principal  conclusions  concerning  the  relation  of  varia- 
tions in  hormone  actions  to  the  fate  of  transplants.  The  effects  of  administra- 
tion of  hormones  to  the  host,  or  of  a  diminution  in  the  amount  of  hormones 
in  the  host  on  the  fate  of  transplanted  organs  varied  in  different  organ  trans- 
plants and  perhaps  also  in  analogous  organ  transplants  in  different  species. 
They  were  moderate,  slight,  or  perhaps  entirely  lacking  in  some  experiments 
with  thyroid,  parathyroid  and  ovarian  grafts,  or  they  were  quite  pronounced, 
especially  in  the  case  of  adrenal  grafts.  They  were  found  in  transplants  of 
endocrine  organs,  as  well  as  in  transplants  of  other  organs  or  tissues  on  which 
hormones  may  exert  a  certain  influence.  Such  effects  may  be  noticeable  after 
autotransplantation  as  well  as  after  homoiotransplantation.  In  the  former,  it 
may  be  assumed  that  continued  hormone  stimulation  prevents  the  gradual 
atrophy  which  might  ensue  due  to  the  combined  effect  of  lack  of  function  of 
the  transplanted  organ  and  of  injurious  conditions  existing  at  the  site  of 
transplantation.  Homoiotransplanted  organs,  as  a  result  of  the  increase  in 
growth  momentum  acquired  with  the  aid  of  hormone  action,  are  enabled,  to 
some  extent,  to  overcome  the  unfavorable  conditions  caused  by  disharmonious 


148  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individuality  differentials.  But  in  all  these  experiments,  the  degree  of  strange- 
ness of  the  individuality  differential  of  the  host  was  a  factor  in  determining 
the  effectiveness  of  the  hormonal  stimulation  on  the  survival  and  growth  of 
the  transplant;  if  the  disharmony  between  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant  was  diminished,  the  results  were  better.  The  increase  in 
growth  momentum  acts  in  these  instances  in  principle  in  the  same  way  as  this 
factor  acts  in  tumors,  which  thereby  also  are  enabled,  to  a  certain  extent,  to 
overcome  the  injurious  action  of  non-adequate  individuality  differentials  by 
an  increased  growth  momentum.  In  some  organ  transplants,  factors  inherent 
in  the  transplanted  cells  seem  to  predominate  over  the  endocrine  factors,  and 
such  transplants  are  largely  unaffected  by  an  increase  in  hormone  stimulation ; 
or  a  minimal  amount  of  such  stimulation  may  be  sufficient  and  its  effectiveness 
cannot  be  increased  by  additional  amounts  of  hormones.  As  stated  already,  in 
addition  to  these  factors,  the  age  of  the  host,  and  especially  of  the  transplant 
may  affect  the  results. 

In  earlier  investigations  concerning  these  problems  emphasis  was  laid  on  the 
importance  of  the  creation  of  a  deficiency  in  the  amount  of  the  corresponding 
endocrine  organ  of  the  host,  as  far  as  the  success  of  the  fate  of  the  graft  was 
concerned.  But  in  reality,  there  is  hidden  behind  this  diminution  in  the  amount 
of  the  host  endocrine  organ  an  increase  in  the  stimulation  of  the  transplant  by 
an  increased  function  or  an  increased  production  of  the  effective  hormone  in 
the  host.  We  may  illustrate  this  interpretation  by  a  reference  to  the  condi- 
tions noted  by  us  in  the  development  of  compensatory  hypertrophy  of  the 
thyroid  gland  in  the  guinea  pig.  We  found  that  this  depends  upon  the  balanc- 
ing of  two  hormone  effects.  In  the  first  place,  the  administration  of  thyroid 
hormone  tends  to  diminish  the  growth  and  hormone  production  of  the  normal 
thyroid  gland  of  the  treated  animal.  The  thyroid  hormone  given  off  by  the 
intact  thyroid  gland,  correspondingly  tends  to  limit  these  activities.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  thyroid-stimulating  hormone  of  the  anterior  pituitary  gland 
opposes  this  effect  by  stimulating  the  thyroid  gland  and  by  causing  hyper- 
trophy. The  normal  condition  of  the  thyroid  gland  is  the  consequence  of  a 
certain  equilibrium  between  these  two  opposing  tendencies,  and  this  equilibri- 
um can  be  changed  by  suppressing  or  enhancing  one  of  the  two  factors  in- 
volved. By  excising  a  considerable  portion  of  the  thyroid  gland,  the  amount 
of  thyroid  hormone  given  off  is  diminished  and,  correspondingly,  the  stimu- 
lating activity  of  the  anterior  pituitary  gains  the  upper  hand;  on  the  other 
hand,  an  increased  activity  of  the  thyroid  causing  a  depression  in  the  func- 
tion of  the  anterior  pituitary  has  the  opposite  effect.  Somewhat  similar  con- 
siderations apply  to  the  equilibrium  in  the  thyroid  gland,  ovary,  and  perhaps 
also  the  islands  of  the  pancreas  and  some  other  organs  with  internal  secretions. 
It  is  not  certain  in  these  cases  whether  the  intrinsic  hormone,  as  for  instance, 
the  thyroid  hormone,  acts  directly  on  the  organ  in  which  it  originates  or 
whether  it  acts  on  the  controlling  endocrine  gland,  the  anterior  pituitary.  In 
the  case  of  the  ovary,  estrogen  exerts  its  effects  evidently  by  way  of  the 
anterior  pituitary.  We  may  therefore  conclude  that  the  results  of  extirpation 
of  an  endocrine  organ  depend  on  the  consequent  surplus  function  of  another 


HORMONES  AND  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      149 

hormone  which  is  able  to  stimulate  the  transplant.  These  hormones  act  pri- 
marily on  the  parenchyma  of  the  graft,  stimulating  its  increased  growth  and 
function,  and  such  increased  activity  of  the  glandular  tissue  may  secondarily 
stimulate  the  activity  of  the  stroma  and  especially  also  its  vascularization, 
which  then  further  aids  the  growth  and  power  of  survival  of  the  graft. 

It  may  therefore  be  stated  that  hormones  may  influence  in  various  ways 
the  effects  of  the  individuality  differentials  on  the  fate  of  a  transplant.  By 
stimulating  growth  processes  in  the  latter,  hormones  tend  to  neutralize  the 
damaging  action  of  strange  differentials,  and  by  depressing  these  growth 
processes  they  may  intensify  the  effect  of  unfavorable  differentials. 


Chapter  1$ 
Individuality  Differentials  and  Blood  Groups 

Towards  the  end  of  the  last  century  and  in  the  beginning  of  this, 
serological  methods  had  been  established  which  made  possible  the 
distinction  of  species  and  wider  groups  of  organisms.  It  was  natural 
that  the  question  should  have  been  raised  as  to  whether  it  might  not  be  possible 
to  distinguish  races  and  even  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species  by 
these  means.  Thus  Bruck  believed  that  by  the  use  of  the  complement  fixation 
method  it  was  possible  to  distinguish  between  different  human  races.  Land- 
steiner,  in  order  to  find  individual  differences,  studied  the  interaction  of 
blood  serum  and  erythrocytes  in  man  and  thus  discovered  the  existence  of 
four  primary  blood  groups,  which  are  based  on  the  possession  or  lack  of 
possession  of  the  agglutinogens  A  and  B  in  the  red  blood  corpuscles  and  of 
specific  agglutinins  for  the  four  types  of  erythrocytes.  Subsequently  it  was 
found  that  also  certain  animal  species  possess  similar  blood  groups  and  that 
there  may  even  be  an  identity  of  some  of  these  antigenic  factors  in  the  eryth- 
rocytes of  different  species,  as  for  instance,  of  man  and  certain  apes.  A 
comparison  of  the  distribution  of  these  blood  groups  in  different  human 
races  showed  that  the  proportions  of  the  four  blood  groups  differed  in  differ- 
ent races,  but  that  the  blood  groups  which  did  occur  were  always  the  same. 
It  was  furthermore  established  that  the  interaction  between  the  agglutinins 
in  the  blood  plasma  or  serum  and  the  blood-group  factors  is  responsible  for 
thrombi  which  form  in  the  blood  if  blood  transfusions  are  made  in  case  the 
donor  and  recipient  belonged  to  different  blood  groups.  There  was  a  definite 
analogy  between  the  blood,  with  its  cells  and  the  complex  protein-containing 
medium  surrounding  these  cells,  and  a  tissue  in  which  the  cells  were  sep- 
arated by  intercellular  substances. 

Previous  to  the  serological  investigations  which  led  to  these  discoveries, 
surgeons  had  noticed  a  difference  in  the  results  of  tissue  grafting,  in  par- 
ticular of  skin  grafting,  if  the  latter  was  made  into  the  person  from  whom 
the  skin  flap  was  taken,  or  into  other  individuals,  and  this  observation  sug- 
gested the  presence  of  chemical  differences  in  the  constitution  of  these  tissues 
in  different  individuals.  Similar  differences  were  found  in  experimental  trans- 
plantations in  animals  and  also,  as  we  observed,  in  the  transplantations  of 
tumors;  we  interpreted  these  differences  as  being  due  to  the  specific  bio- 
chemical relationships  between  the  bodyfluids  and  the  tissues  in  donors  and 
hosts.  In  continuation  of  this  work,  begun  in  1909,  finer  methods  were  de- 
veloped for  the  investigation  of  the  relationship  between  such  tissues.  These 
depended  largely  upon  the  study  of  the  cellular  interactions  between  tissues  of 
the  host  and  of  transplants.  On  the  basis  of  these  investigations,  gradually  the 
theory  of  the  individuality  differentials  developed,  according  to  which  all 

150 


INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  AND  BLOOD  GROUPS  151 

tissues  or  organs  in  the  same  organism  have  in  common  a  chemical  charac- 
teristic, which  differs  from  those  present  in  every  other  organism.  These 
differences  are  genetic  in  origin  and  are  therefore  proportional  to  the  genetic 
relationship  between  different  individuals,  but  they  are  not  identical  with  the 
genes.  Such  individuality  differentials  must  be  distinguished  from  the  tissue 
differentials,  which  are  the  same  in  the  corresponding  tissues  in  different  in- 
dividuals, but  which  differ  in  different  tissues  of  the  same  individual.  Also, 
the  red  blood  corpuscles  possess  these  individuality  differentials.  At  first,  by 
means  of  the  study  of  the  fate  of  transplanted  blood  clots,  and  especially  of 
the  cellular  reactions  of  the  host  against  them,  merely  the  presence  of  heterog- 
enous, but  not  of  homoiogenous,  individuality  differentials  could  be  definitely 
established,  but  subsequently,  by  the  use  of  the  white  blood  cell  reaction, 
Blumenthal  could  demonstrate  also  the  presence  of  homoiogenous  differentials 
in  blood  clots,  and  correspondingly,  in  the  erythrocytes  included  in  these 
clots,  or  at  least  reactions  were  found  similar  to  those  elicited  by  homoiog- 
enous differentials  present  in  the  various  tissues. 

Following  the  experiments  of  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth,  who  succeeded  in 
producing  hemolysins  for  homoiogenous  erythrocytes  in  goats,  Todd  extended 
these  investigations  and  obtained  similar  hemolysins  for  homoiogenous  red 
corpuscles  in  cattle  and  sheep.  In  1911,  he  found  differences  between  red 
blood  corpuscles  of  individuals  in  certain  species  by  using  the  differential 
absorption  method.  These  antigenic  differences  between  the  erythrocytes  of 
individual  animals  could  be  readily  demonstrated,  except  in  cases  where  there 
was  a  close  relationship  between  two  individuals.  In  1930  and  1931,  this  in- 
vestigator prepared  polyvalent  homoio-(iso)  agglutinating  immune  sera 
against  fowl  erythrocytes,  and  again,  by  using  the  differential  absorption 
method,  he  found  that  the  red  blood  cells  of  each  individual  examined  differed 
from  those  of  every  other  individual.  Also,  members  of  the  same  family 
differed  from  one  another  in  the  agglutinogens  of  their  blood  corpuscles,  the 
degree  of  difference  varying  very  much  in  individual  cases.  The  investiga- 
tions of  Todd  on  antigens  present  in  the  erythrocytes  of  cattle  were  recently 
confirmed  and  extended  by  Ferguson,  Stormont  and  Irwin,  who,  by  repeated 
injections  of  one  individual  with  the  erythrocytes  of  another  individual  of 
this  species,  prepared  homoiogenous  hemolytic  sera,  or  by  injecting  a  rabbit 
with  such  erythrocytes,  they  prepared  heterogenous  hemolytic  sera ;  they 
furthermore  analyzed  the  antigens  present  in  the  erythrocytes  in  an  indi- 
vidual animal  by  means  of  these  two  kinds  of  sera.  These  tests  were  refined 
by  absorption  of  the  antibodies  from  the  immune  sera  by  the  erythrocytes  of 
individual  animals.  Thus,  these  investigators  found  thirty  different  antigens 
giving  origin  to  immune  hemolysins.  Each  individual  differed  from  all  other 
individuals  tested  in  the  combination  of  the  antigens  present  in  its  red  cor- 
puscles. There  were  indications  that  other  antigens  might  be  added  to  this 
number.  There  were  moreover,  strong  indications  that  each  separate  antigenic 
substance  was  determined  by  a  single  dominant  gene  and  that  correspondingly 
many  multiple  genes  determined  the  set  of  antigens  in  a  certain  individual.  It 
is  very  likely  that  by  using  for  immunization  other  species  in  addition  to  the 


152  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

rabbit,  and  by  testing  erythrocytes  of  various  cattle  with  the  normal  sera  of 
individuals  from  different  species,  a  considerable  number  of  additional  anti- 
gens may  be  found  in  cattle  erythrocytes.  There  is  therefore  no  basis  for  the 
suggestion  made  by  these  authors  that  each  one  of  the  thirty  genes,  corre- 
sponding to  the  thirty  antigenic  substances  found  so  far,  might  be  located  in 
one  of  the  thirty  chromosome  pairs  which  the  cells  of  cattle  are  supposed  to 
possess.  Inasmuch  as  these  antigenic  (individuality  differential)  substances 
are  genetically  determined,  it  is  to  be  assumed  that,  considering  the  relatively 
large  number  of  these  substances,  on  the  average  there  should  be  a  greater 
similarity  between  the  sets  present  in  parents  and  offspring  than  between  the 
sets  of  less  closely  related  individuals.  Experiments  were  in  agreement  with 
this  postulate.  And  there  is  thus,  in  this  respect,  a  correspondence  between  the 
effects  of  these  multiple  factors  present  in  erythrocytes  and  the  individuality 
differentials  of  tissues  in  general. 

In  the  meantime,  Landsteiner  and  others,  by  studying  further  the  agglutina- 
tion reactions  in  blood  of  man  and  of  other  species,  had  added  several  addi- 
tional factors  (P.M.N.,  Rh.,  Ax  and  A2)  to  the  original  A  and  B  which  were 
found  in  erythrocytes;  accordingly,  the  number  of  factors  which  have  to  be 
considered  in  selecting  compatible  donors  and  receivers  in  transfusions  of 
blood  has  also  increased,  and  it  seems  very  probable  that  this  number  will  be 
still  further  increased  in  the  future.  As  to  the  different  agglutinogens  which 
are  present  in  and  distinguish  the  red  corpuscles  of  fowl,  Kozelka,  who  also 
extended  the  work  of  Todd,  believes  it  possible  that  their  number  is  small, 
notwithstanding  the  infinite  number  of  individuals  which  all  differ  in  the 
character  of  their  erythrocytes.  This  opinion  is  based  on  the  fact  to  which 
Landsteiner  and  Wiener  have  repeatedly  drawn  attention,  namely,  that  there 
are  a  great  many  possible  combinations  of  relatively  few  factors.  On  the  other 
hand,  it  must  also  be  remembered  that  the  greater  the  number  is  of  different 
rabbit  immune  sera  and  of  natural  sera  from  different  species  which  are  used 
for  testing  the  agglutination  and  hemolysis  of  the  corpuscles  of  individual 
fowl  or  mammals,  the  greater  will  become  the  number  of  factors  which  dis- 
tinguish the  erythrocytes  of  individual  organisms.  While  it  is  true  that  the- 
oretically a  limited  number  of  factors  would  suffice  to  account  for  a  large 
number  of  differences  between  different  individuals  of  a  certain  species,  this 
does  not  necessarily  prove  that  the  number  is  actually  very  small. 

As  far  as  the  individuality  differentials  are  concerned,  there  are  strong 
indications  that  the  number  of  distinguishing  factors  is  very  great.  We  have 
referred  already  to  some  experimental  data  which  strongly  support  this  con- 
clusion, such  as  the  many  fine  gradations  found  in  the  strength  of  the  reac- 
tions against  syngenesious  and  homoiogenous  tissues,  in  accordance  with  the 
relationship  of  donor  and  host,  and  the  fact  that  no  autogenous  reaction  is 
found  against  homoiogenous  or  syngenesious  tissues  except  when  we  weaken 
artificially  the  ability  of  the  host  to  attack  the  strange  transplant,  but  that 
autogenous  reactions  occur  only  if  the  host  and  transplant  possess  the  same 
genetic  constitution.  Furthermore,  marked  differences  between  the  individu- 
ality differentials  of  host  and  graft  lead  to  rapid  and  strong  reactions,  and 


INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  AND  BLOOD  GROUPS  153 

slight  differences  may  lead  to  weak  and  often  long  delayed  reactions.  Especial- 
ly significant  in  this  connection  are  transplantations  within  closely  inbred 
strains;  here  the  great  difficulty  in  making  the  genetic  constitution,  which 
determines  the  nature  of  the  individuality  differentials,  identical,  is  clearly 
demonstrated ;  it  is  also  shown  that  the  reactions  against  the  latter  are  parallel 
to  the  differences  in  the  genetic  constitutions  of  host  and  donor  and  that  these 
differences  show  all  kinds  of  gradations.  Taking  all  of  these  facts  together, 
the  only  conclusion  possible  seems  to  be  that  many  genes  take  part  in  the  de- 
termination of  the  nature  of  the  individuality  differentials. 

It  seems  therefore  most  probable  that  a  further  anlysis  of  the  antigens  pres- 
ent in  erythrocytes  will  show  that  they  are  either  identical  with  or  are  a  part 
of  the  factors  which  call  forth  the  individuality  differential  reactions  against 
all  kinds  of  strange  tissues.  The  peculiar  character  of  the  erythrocytes  makes 
it  possible  to  obtain  for  the  analysis  of  the  constitution  of  these  cellular  ele- 
ments, special  hemolytic  and  agglutination  reactions,  which  cannot  be  applied 
generally  in  the  study  of  the  reactions  against  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials ;  but  even  in  the  case  of  the  erythrocytes,  as  a  rule  it  is  not  possible  to  dem- 
onstrate the  existence  in  the  serum  of  the  host  of  preformed  hemolysins  or  ag- 
glutinins for  the  red  blood  cells  of  the  donor.  Other  characteristics  which  we 
have  discussed  repeatedly  make  it  possible  to  distinguish  the  individuality 
differentials  of  cells  and  tissues  in  general,  and  there  is,  therefore,  no  reason 
why  the  individuality  differentials,  which  were  established  by  entirely  differ- 
ent methods  and  which  are  common  to  all  tissues,  should  be  subordinated  to 
the  factors  which  determine  the  agglutination  and  hemolysis  of  erythrocytes, 
which  latter  represent  very  specialized  modes  of  reaction  between  particular 
kinds  of  cells  and  particular  constituents  of  the  blood  serum. 

These  conclusions  as  to  the  relations  between  the  antigenic  constitution  of 
the  erythrocytes  and  the  individuality  differential  do  not  necessarily  apply  if 
instead  of  the  numerous  antigens  of  the  erythrocytes,  we  consider  merely  the 
four  primary  blood  groups.  By  means  of  these  it  is  possible  to  distinguish  be- 
tween certain  individuals,  and  it  is  the  identity  or  lack  of  identity  of  the  blood 
groups  to  which  two  individuals  belong  that  determines  the  compatibility  of 
their  blood  in  transfusions ;  as  stated  the  blood  shows  some  analogies  to 
tissues ;  therefore  the  compatibility  of  the  blood  might  be  taken  as  an  indication 
of  the  compatibility  of  the  tissues  comprising  an  individual.  In  pursuing  this 
trend  of  thought,  several  investigators  went  still  further  and  considered  the 
blood  group  characters  of  an  individual  as  the  most  significant  features  of  his 
constitution. 

The  experimental  data  on  which  the  evaluation  of  the  correctness  of  this 
interpretation  has  been  based  were  obtained  in  a  comparative  study  of  the 
results  of  skin  grafting,  in  cases  in  which  donor  and  host  of  the  graft  belonged 
to  the  same  or  to  different  blood  groups.  The  number  of  skin  graftings  in 
man,  in  which  the  blood  group  relations  between  donors  and  hosts  have  been 
considered,  is  great,  but  the  conclusions  arrived  at  by  various  investigators 
differ  very  much.  There  are  those  who  believe  that  the  success  of  homoiog- 
enous  skin  transplantations  is  determined  by  the  blood  group  relations  be- 


154  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tween  donor  and  host ;  there  are  others,  as,  for  instance,  Lexer  and  Holman, 
who  were  unable  to  discover  a  relation  between  the  compatibility  of  blood  of 
donor  and  host  and  the  result  of  grafting,  and  there  are  still  others  who  do  not 
hold  that  identity  of  the  blood  groups  makes  the  homoiogenous  transplantation 
of  skin  fully  successful,  but  who  still  find  indications  that  the  sameness  of  the 
blood  groups  at  least  delays  the  destruction  of  the  homoiogenous  grafts. 

In  appraising  the  value  to  be  attached  to  these  divergent  results,  it  seems 
that  surgeons,  with  the  largest  experience  in  skin  grafting,  and  among  them 
those  who  have  carried  out  these  transplantations  more  recently,  have  ob- 
tained as  a  rule  entirely  negative  results,  while  especially  some  earlier  work- 
ers, with  more  limited  experience,  who  did  not  follow  the  fate  of  the  trans- 
plants over  longer  periods  of  time,  believed  that  they  had  obtained  confirma- 
tory results;  as  to  the  latter,  however,  there  always  remains  a  doubt  as  to 
whether  the  definite  healing-in  of  the  transplants  was  actually  seen,  or  whether 
the  transplants  were  not  gradually  replaced  by  the  adjoining  skin  of  the  host  in 
cases  in  which  there  was  compatibility  between  the  blood  groups  of  donor 
and  host  of  the  graft.  More  convincing  then  these  earlier  experiments  are  the 
experiments  of  transplantations  in  animals ;  especially  the  very  careful  in- 
vestigations of  Kozelka,  in  which  skin  of  fowl  was  used  for  transplantation, 
are  significant  in  this  respect ;  no  relation  between  the  agglutinogens  present  in 
the  erythrocytes  of  host  and  donor  and  the  success  of  the  transplantation  was 
noted.  Likewise  in  the  work  of  Ingbrigtsen,  who  transplanted  segments  of 
arteries  in  cats,  and  that  of  Haddow,  who  transplanted  sarcoma  in  fowl,  the 
findings  were  independent  of  the  agglutination  reactions  between  the  blood  of 
donor  and  host.  We  believe,  therefore,  that  the  evidence  available  at  present 
makes  very  improbable  a  direct  relationship  between  the  four  primary  blood 
groups  and  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor.  Correspondingly, 
we  must  conclude  that  there  is  no  definite  correlation  between  the  results  of 
transfusion  of  blood  and  those  of  homoiogenous  grafting  of  skin.  There  seems 
to  be  no  more  reason  for  assuming  that  the  particular  genes  determining  the 
four  blood  groups  determine  also  the  fate  of  homoiogenous  transplants  than 
for  believing  that  the  identity  of  heterophile  antigens,  among  different  classes 
of  animals,  makes  heterotransplantation  between  these  classes  possible. 

However,  in  recent  experiments,  Sandstrom  made  some  observations  of  a 
different  nature,  which  suggest  to  him  a  relation  between  organismal  differ- 
entials and  blood  group  antigens.  Implantation  of  a  piece  of  macerated  meta- 
nephric  tissue  of  the  duck  on  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  of  the  chick 
caused  the  death  of  the  chick,  provided  the  donor  of  the  implanted  tissue  was 
near  the  stage  of  hatching  or  had  hatched.  Neither  implantation  of  non- 
macerated  tissue  nor  of  macerated  chick  kidney  to  the  chorio-allantoic  mem- 
brane of  the  duck  had  this  effect.  Other  kinds  of  macerated  duck  tissue  have 
apparently  not  yet  been  tested.  Sandstrom  believes  that  the  death  of  the  chick 
in  this  experiment  was  caused  by  an  agglutination  of  erythrocytes  within  the 
blood  vessels.  However,  it  is  not  certain  from  his  report  whether  the  occlusion 
of  the  vessels  was  due  to  a  pure  agglutination  process  or  whether  coagulation 
processes  had  been  involved  in  this  effect;  it  seems  possible  that  it  was  due 


INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  AND  BLOOD  GROUPS  155 

to  the  action  of  tissue  coagulins  extracted  from  the  macerated  kidney  tissue. 
The  further  possibility  has  to  be  considered  that  in  this  case  toxic  substances 
which  were  peculiar  to  the  duck  kidney  or  also  to  other  duck  tissue  were  ex- 
tracted from  the  implanted  material ;  such  toxins  would  in  certain  respects  be 
comparable  to  special  poisons  which  are  present  in  some  amphibian  tissues. 
But  substances  of  this  kind  are  distinct  from  the  species  differentials.  Con- 
sidering all  these  data,  there  is  no  reason  to  attribute  the  effect  observed  by 
Sandstrom  to  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  duck,  but  the  substances 
responsible  for  it  may  represent  a  special  kind  of  tissue  differential. 

Returning  to  the  consideration  of  the  blood  groups,  the  conclusions  stated 
above  apply  directly  to  the  four  primary  blood  groups ;  they  probably  apply 
also  to  the  secondary  factors  (A  and  Ax,  P.M.N.,  Rh.)  more  recently  found. 
All  these  factors  determine  the  agglutination  in  vitro  of  blood  corpuscles  of 
one  individual  by  the  serum  of  another,  as  well  as  the  results  of  transfusions 
of  whole  blood  or  of  plasma.  But  as  stated,  it  is  very  likely  that  additional 
factors  will  be  discovered  in  the  future  also  in  human  blood,  and  that  the 
human  erythrocytes  contain  individuality  differential  constituents.  It  is  con- 
ceivable therefore  that  in  some  cases,  in  which  transfusion  of  blood  or  of 
plasma  has  led  to  injurious  reactions,  strange  individuality  differentials  may 
have  been  involved. 

It  may  then  be  concluded  that  the  greater  the  number  of  factors  which  are 
found  as  determiners  of  the  agglutination  and  hemolysis  of  the  erythrocytes, 
the  greater  will  be  the  probability  that  some,  or  even  all.  of  these  factors  may 
also  be  constituents  of  the  individuality  differentials  and  thus  may  be  the  same 
as  the  factors  which  determine  the  interaction  of  tissues  from  different 
individuals.  However,  if  we  restrict  ourselves  to  a  consideration  of  the  four 
original  blood  groups,  which  at  first  were  the  only  ones  known  and  analyzed 
from  this  point  of  view,  these  cannot,  in  all  probability,  be  identified  with  the 
individuality  differentials.  This  conclusion  is  in  agreement  with  the  experi- 
ments which  we  have  already  cited,  as  well  as  with  some  other  data  which 
may  briefly  be  mentioned:  (1)  Brother  and  sisters  may  belong  to  different 
blood  groups,  whereas,  many  entirely  unrelated  individuals  of  the  same 
species,  and  even  members  of  different  species,  may  belong  to  the  same  blood 
group.  This  identity  of  blood  groups  in  members  of  different  species  does  not 
improve  the  outcome  of  the  corresponding  heterotransplantations,  which  de- 
pends on  the  character  of  organismal  differentials.  The  individuality  differ- 
entials are  graded  according  to  the  genetic  similarity  between  the  bearers  of 
these  individuality  differentials.  (2)  There  is  much  evidence  that  homoiog- 
enous  individuality  differentials  in  no  case  have  become,  through  inbreed- 
ing, absolutely  identical  with  antogenous  differentials.  Even  after  many  gen- 
erations of  brother-sister  inbreeding  there  is  still  no  complete  identity  of  the 
individuality  differentials  in  members  of  the  closely  inbred  strains,  and  there 
are  strong  indications  that  reactions  against  slight  disharmonies  of  grafts  may 
appear  in  the  hosts  a  long  time  after  the  transplantation  has  taken  place. 
Furthermore,  the  strength  of  the  response  of  the  host  against  different  organs 
and  tissues  differs  and  by  selecting  an  active  organ  and  the  proper  time  for 


156  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

examination,  a  reaction  of  the  host  may  be  demonstrated,  which  otherwise 
would  not  have  become  manifest.  In  these  respects,  the  primary  blood  group 
antigens  and  individuality  differentials  differ  from  each  other.  (3)  While  in- 
dividuality differentials  have  been  found  in  all  vertebrates  so  far  studied,  and 
at  least  as  far  down  in  the  phylogenetic  series  as  the  anuran  amphibia,  there 
seem  to  be  great  variations  among  different  species  and  classes  in  regard  to 
the  presence,  number  and  character  of  the  blood  groups.  (4)  While  the 
reactions  against  individuality  differentials  manifest  very  fine  gradations  in 
response  in  accordance  with  the  genetic  relationship  between  host  and  trans- 
plant, the  blood  group  reactions  are  sharply  defined  into  essentially  two 
classes,  namely,  those  of  compatible  or  incompatible  individuals. 

In  certain  respects  the  blood  group  factors  of  primates  have  an  intermediate 
position  between  the  organismal  and  tissue  differentials,  having  certain  fea- 
tures in  common  with  both.  As  far  as  the  organismal  differentials  are  con- 
cerned, we  shall  discuss  later  their  phylogenetic  evolution ;  it  would  be  of  in- 
terest to  trace  in  a  similar  manner  also  the  evolution  of  the  blood  group  anti- 
gens. Such  a  study  might  help  to  clear  up  still  further  the  relationship  between 
the  blood  group  factors  and  the  organismal  or  individuality  differentials. 


Chapter  16 

The  Relations  Between  Processes  of  Immunity  and 
Individuality  Differentials  in  Transplantation 

The  observations  made  by  surgeons  and  by  experimental  biologists, 
which  showed  that  in  man  and  in  higher  animals  autotransplantation 
succeeds  much  better  than  homoiotransplantation  of  various  organs 
and  tissues  and  that  heterotransplantation  never  succeeds,  gave  rise  to  various 
interpretations  as  to  the  cause  of  these  differences.  In  tracing  the  develop- 
ment of  these  interpretations  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  they  depend  largely 
on  two  factors.  In  the  first  place,  the  discoveries  made  and  the  systems  of 
thought  built  up  in  different  fields  of  science  are  seen  to  be  related  to  par- 
ticular problems  certain  analogies  are  observed  or  are  assumed  to  exist  be- 
tween two  different  series  of  investigations  and  the  conclusions  of  the  one  are 
applied,  with  some  modifications,  to  the  other.  Secondly,  new  experiments 
are  carried  out  in  order  to  analyze  a  problem  by  a  direct  approach,  but  here, 
also,  the  interpretation  may  be  influenced  by  analogies  with  conclusions  ar- 
rived at  in  the  related  science.  These  two  factors  are  clearly  discernible  in  the 
search  for  an  answer  to  the  question  as  to  why  homoiogenous  transplanta- 
tions do  not  as  a  rule  succeed.  Towards  the  end  of  the  last  and  in  the  be- 
ginning of  this  century,  the  thoughts  of  pathologists,  in  their  analysis  of 
transplantations  of  organs  and  tissues  in  higher  animals,  were  influenced  by 
the  investigations  of  experimental  biologists,  who  grafted  tissues  in  lower 
animals  and  plants  and  who  found  polarity  in  the  structure  of  the  organisms 
to  be  a  factor  in  transplantation,  and  who  also  observed  that  the  character  of 
the  tissues  adjoining  each  other  in  host  and  transplant  was  of  great  signifi- 
cance in  determining  the  compatibility  of  grafts  and  hosts,  and  it  was  main- 
ly for  the  purpose  of  discovering  polarity  and  other  related  factors  as  deter- 
miners of  normal  structures  that  biologists  carried  out  experiments  in  graft- 
ing. Such  an  influence  is  noticeable  in  the  work  of  the  pathologist  Marchand 
on  transplantation  in  higher  animals  and  in  man,  in  the  writings  of  Lubarsch, 
and  also  to  some  extent,  in  those  of  Schoene.  Then  in  the  beginning  of  this 
century,  the  differences  between  the  results  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous 
transplantations  of  tissues  and  tumors  in  higher  vertebrates  were  inter- 
preted as  due  to  the  various  degrees  of  compatibility  or  incompatibility  be- 
tween the  chemical  composition  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  and  of  the 
transplanted  tissues.  This  interpretation  was  suggested  by  us,  and  the  im- 
portance of  the  biochemical  constitution  of  host  and  graft  was  also  empha- 
sized by  Borst,  who  believed  that  inadequate  biological  systems  may  cause 
atrophy  and  loss  of  function  of  transplanted  organs;  Borst  considered,  in 
addition,  the  effect  of  cytolysins  and  anaphylaxis,  assuming  that  such  factors 

157 


158  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

may  explain,  as  well,  the  occasional  lack  of  success  in  autogenous  trans- 
plantations, while  we  held  that  the  controlling  factors  are  identical  in  hosts 
and  in  autogenous  grafts. 

It  was  at  this  point  in  the  history  of  transplantations  that  the  viewpoints 
developed  in  immunology  and  serology  began  to  be  applied.  It  was  believed, 
with  some  justification,  that  these  differences  in  the  chemical  constitution  of 
host  and  transplant  might  be  due  to  differences  in  the  structure  of  proteins  or 
of  a  certain  protein  in  host  and  transplant,  and  that  after  transplantation  of  a 
tissue  into  a  different  host,  such  a  protein  might  give  rise  to  antibodies,  com- 
parable to  hemolysins  or  agglutinins.  Furthermore,  anaphylactic  phenomena 
were  used  in  explaining  the  destruction  of  the  transplants  in  unfavorable 
hosts.  While  we  stressed  the  concept  that  the  primary  incompatibility  between 
bodyfluids  and  tissues  of  host  and  transplant,  as  such,  may  lead  to  toxic  in- 
jury of  the  transplant,  the  large  majority  of  investigators  thought  at  that  time 
that  immune  processes,  taking  place  in  the  host  against  the  graft,  were  the 
principal  factors  that  produced  the  injury  and  destruction  of  the  graft  after 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  transplantation,  although  it  was  considered 
possible  that  a  primary  toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids  might  play  a  minor  role. 
This  point  of  view  was  presented  especially  by  Schoene,  a  collaborator  of 
Ehrlich,  and  there  was  some  direct  experimental  evidence  in  favor  of  this 
interpretation.  In  the  case  of  tumor  transplantation  it  had  been  possible  to 
demonstrate  an  active  immunization  of  the  host  as  the  result  of  the  growth 
and  regression  of  a  primary  tumor  and  of  various  other  conditions,  and 
Russell  went  so  far  as  to  maintain  that  in  every  case  the  lack  of  success  in 
transplantation  of  tumors  as  well  as  the  regression  of  transplanted  tumors 
was  due  to  the  development  of  an  active  immunity  against  the  tumors.  The 
reaction  of  the  host  towards  the  transplanted  tumor  was  assumed  to  be  the 
consequence  of  the  development  of  immunity  in  the  host  and  the  period 
necessary  for  the  appearance  of  a  reaction  should  accordingly  correspond  to 
the  time  required  for  the  production  of  an  immune  state.  This  view  was 
accepted  also  by  Tyzzer  and  Burgess,  and  by  various  other  investigators,  and 
Tyzzer  applied  this  conception  to  the  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  lymphocytes. 

In  the  case  of  normal  tissues,  Schoene  found  it  possible  to  immunize  a  rat 
actively  against  mouse  organs ;  such  an  immunized  rat  reacted  more  rapidly 
against  a  subsequently  transplanted  piece  of  mouse  skin.  It  was  more  difficult 
to  elicit  immunity  against  homoiogenous  skin.  But  Schoene  succeeded,  by  pre- 
liminary treatments  with  embryo  skin,  kidney  or  liver  of  rabbit,  in  immuniz- 
ing another  rabbit  against  homoiogenous  tissues,  so  that,  24  days  after  graft- 
ing, a  homoiogenous  skin  transplant  was  more  rapidly  destroyed  while  autog- 
enous skin  was  not  affected.  The  more  closely  donor  and  host  were  related, 
the  more  difficult  it  was  to  produce  such  an  immunity.  Accordingly,  skin 
grafts  between  brothers  and  sisters  were  more  successful  than  those  between 
distant  members  of  the  species ;  yet  Schoene  did  not  recognize  the  significance 
of  genetic  factors  in  transplantation.  Also,  the  observation  that  skin  grafts 
could  apparently  heal  in  for  two  or  three  weeks  and  that  only  then  were  they 
cast  off,  was  interpreted  as  indicating  that  a  certain  time  had  to  elapse  before 


PROCESSES  OF  IMMUNITY  159 

the  active  immunity  could  establish  itself.  There  were,  in  addition,  the  experi- 
ments of  Fichera,  who  showed  that  it  was  possible  to  immunize  rats  against 
grafts  of  rat  embryo  by  successive  transplantations  of  the  tissues  of  rat 
embryos,  and  those  of  Peyton  Rous,  who  obtained  similar  results  with  mouse 
embryos.  Likewise,  repeated  transplantation  of  adult  skin  seemed  to  lead  to  a 
more  active  destruction  of  the  last  transplant.  There  may  be  cited,  besides, 
the  finding  of  von  Dungern,  that  rabbits  could  be  immunized  against  the 
tracheal  epithelium  of  cattle,  which  was  then  more  rapidly  destroyed  by  the 
bodyfluids  of  rabbits.  Subsequent  investigators,  as  for  instance  Lehmann  and 
Tammann,  as  well  as  Fischer,  assumed  that  the  development  of  an  active  im- 
munity was  the  cause  of  the  lack  of  success  in  homoiotransplantation.  The 
former  conceded,  however,  that  with  a  heterogenous  serum  a  primary  toxicity 
may  play  a  certain  role,  but  that  this  would  be  of  slight  importance  in  homoiog- 
enous  transplantation. 

In  addition  to  the  active  immunity,  some  other  factors  were  thought  to  cause 
the  destruction  of  homoiogenous  transplants.  Ehrlich  had  observed  that 
growth  of  a  first  tumor  could  prevent  the  growth  of  a  second  tumor  in  certain 
cases,  and  he  also  noted  that  transplantation  of  a  tumor  piece  into  a  pregnant 
animal  did  not  succeed  well :  he  interpreted  these  effects  as  being  due  to  a  com- 
petition for  specific  foodstuffs,  in  which  an  established  tumor  or  a  growing 
embryo  had  the  advantage  over  a  recently  transplanted  tumor,  which  thus, 
suffered  from  athrepsia.  To  this  factor,  starvation,  Ehrlich  attributed  also 
the  slow  death  which  a  mouse  tumor  underwent  when  it  was  transplanted  to  a 
rat.  In  a  similar  way  Schoene  explained  the  fact  that  homoio-  or  heterotrans- 
planted  skin  could  be  successfully  re-transplanted  to  the  original  donor  after 
it  had  been  in  the  new  host  for  three  days,  whereas,  after  a  period  of  four  days 
the  injury  of  the  skin  graft  was  so  severe  that  a  successful  retransplantation 
was  no  longer  possible. 

Among  still  other  factors  considered  as  responsible  for  the  death  of  homoio- 
transplanted  tissues,  may  be  mentioned  lack  of  function.  The  importance  of 
this  factor  was  especially  indicated  by  an  experiment  of  Jores,  which  showed 
that  electric  stimulation  exerts  a  beneficial  effect  on  transplants  of  striated 
muscle.  Also,  deficient  nourishment  and  older  age  of  the  host  resulted  in  less 
successful  transplantation,  as  did  also,  according  to  Ribbert,  differences  in  the 
composition  of  the  inorganic  salts  of  host  and  donor.  Schoene  accordingly  be- 
lieved that  factors,  such  as  favorable  conditions  for  function  and  nourishment 
in  the  host,  may  make  possible  a  successful  homoiotransplantation.  However, 
less  significance  was  attached  to  these  factors  by  later  investigators,  who,  as 
stated  previously,  stressed  above  all  the  importance  of  an  active  immunization 
of  the  host  against  the  transplant  as  the  cause  of  the  destruction  of  homoiog- 
enous and  heterogenous  grafts.  That  so  little  importance  was  attributed  to 
the  primary  incompatibility  between  the  bodyfluids  and  tissues  of  host  and 
transplant  seems  to  have  been  due  largely  to  two  factors.  In  the  first  place,  the 
reactions  taking  place  between  the  hemolysins  and  bacteriolysins,  the  agglu- 
tinins and  precipitins,  which  were  considered  as  types  of  primary  toxins, 
and  the  cells  providing  the  antigens  occur  very  rapidly  and  inasmuch  as  so 


160  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

rapid  an  injurious  effect  was  not  observed  in  the  case  of  transplanted  tissues, 
the  importance  of  such  toxins  in  transplantation  was  ruled  out.  The  possi- 
bility that  in  homoiogenous  transplantation  we  may  have  to  deal  with  primary 
toxins  of  a  different  kind,  acting  less  acutely  but  rather  slowly  in  a  gradually 
cumulative  manner,  was  not  sufficiently  taken  into  account.  In  the  second 
place  the  conclusion  of  these  investigators,  were  based  to  a  large  extent,  on 
naked-eye  observations  of  skin  grafts  and  not  on  the  microscopical  examina- 
tion of  successive  stages  in  the  process  of  transplantation.  The  latter  would 
have  revealed  the  fact  that  a  reaction  of  the  host  may  set  in  at  a  much  earlier 
stage  than  would  have  been  otherwise  expected ;  the  specific  cellular  reactions 
of  the  host  could  begin  as  soon  as  the  transplant  had  sufficiently  recovered  from 
the  injuries  inflicted  by  the  operation  and  by  the  transfer  into  a  strange  soil. 

The  cellular  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  transplant  were  likewise 
attributed  to  immune  processes  which  develop  in  the  host.  In  the  case  of  tumor 
transplantations,  cellular  infiltrations  were  observed  by  Da  Fano  in  various 
places  in  the  host ;  these  cells  were  lymphocytes,  plasma  cells  and  macrophages, 
and  they  were  interpreted  by  Da  Fano  as  indicators  of,  as  well  as  instruments 
in  the  production  of  an  active  immunity  against  the  transplanted  tumor,  and 
also  the  numerous  observations  of  Murphy  as  to  the  significance  of  lympho- 
cytes around  transplanted  tumors  were  in  harmony  with  this  view.  On  the 
other  hand,  we  interpreted  cellular  infiltrations,  principally  of  lymphocytes, 
around  and  in  the  homoiogenous  transplants  as  being  caused  by  the  difference 
in  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplants,  these  cells  being  at- 
tracted by  the  strange  individuality  differentials  of  the  grafted  tissue;  their 
presence  indicates  the  existence  of  variable  degrees  of  incompatibility  be- 
tween tissues  and  the  action  of  a  mild  rather  than  that  of  a  severe,  acutely 
acting  toxin. 

We  tested,  partly  in  collaboration  with  Cora  Hesselberg,  the  effect  of  a 
first  transplant  on  a  second  transplant  in  several  series  of  experiments  in 
guinea  pigs  and  rats  of  different  ages.  The  first  transplants  remained  in  the 
host  for  periods  varying  from  two  to  twelve  days.  Control  experiments  were 
made  for  the  first  as  well  as  for  the  second  transplants.  Single  instead  of 
double  transplants  served  as  controls  in  some  instances ;  in  others,  a  piece  of 
paraffin  was  inserted  instead  of  a  first  transplant.  In  general,  it  may  be  stated 
that  no  definite  effect  of  the  first  on  the  second  transplant  was  noticeable  in 
these  experiments,  the  condition  of  both  transplants  varying  within  the  same 
range  as  those  in  the  controls.  If  we  assume  that  it  was  the  development  of  an 
immune  state  in  the  host  which  caused  the  reactions  against  the  graft,  we 
should  have  expected  that  about  eight  to  twelve  days  after  transplantation  of 
the  first  pieces  an  immunity  was  established  and  that,  accordingly,  the  lympho- 
cytes were  ready  to  attack  the  strange  homoiogenous  tissue.  A  definite  lympho- 
cytic reaction  should  therefore  have  developed  around  a  second  transplant 
within  the  first  five  days  after  transplantation.  This,  however,  was  in  no  case 
observed ;  instead,  the  reaction  occurred  at  about  the  usual  time  and  as  usual 
there  were  considerable  variations  in  the  strength  of  the  reactions  against  the 


PROCESSES  OF  IMMUNITY  161 

transplants  and  in  the  preservation  of  the  latter ;  under  these  circumstances  it 
was  very  difficult  to  recognize  the  possible  presence  of  slight  effects  of  a  first 
on  a  second  graft.  However,  as  a  rule,  in  accordance  with  expectations,  the 
reactions  against  the  first  and  older  graft  were  more  severe,  on  the  average, 
than  the  reactions  against  the  second  graft.  Furthermore,  thyroid  gland  and 
cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  which  were  the  tissues  transplanted  in  the  majority  of 
cases,  again  behaved  in  a  corresponding  manner  in  the  individual  experiments. 
It  was  likewise  noticeable  that  the  same  host  reacted  with  different  degrees  of 
severity  against  homoiogenous  transplants  which  had  originated  in  different 
donors,  and  different  hosts  seemed  to  differ  in  the  severity  of  the  reactions 
against  the  same  donor.  There  was  in  a  number  of  instances,  in  the  same  host, 
a  correlation  between  the  fate  of  the  first  transplant  examined  33  days  after 
transplantation  and  of  a  second  transplant  examined  after  12  days.  When  the 
first  transplant  was  relatively  well  preserved,  or  when  the  reaction  against  it 
was  severe,  also  when  there  was  much  lymphocytic  infiltration  in  the  first 
transplant,  similar  conditions  were  found  in  the  second  transplant.  This  indi- 
cates that  the  degree  or  reactivity  of  the  host  against  homoiogenous  differen- 
tials was  one  of  the  factors  that  determined  the  results  of  the  transplantations. 
From  these  experiments  we  may  therefore  conclude  that  immune  reactions  in 
all  probability  are  not  of  paramount  importance  in  determining  the  reactions 
against  homoiogenous  transplants,  but  on  the  other  hand,  we  cannot  exclude 
the  possibility  that  slight  immunizing  effects  may  be  exerted  by  a  first  on  a 
second  homoiogenous  transplant. 

The  primary  factors  determining  the  fate  of  transplants  are,  then,  the 
differences  in  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  these 
differentials  being  preformed  and  giving  rise  to  relatively  slow  and  mild,  but, 
in  many  instances,  gradually  accumulating  primary  reactions  against  the 
transplants.  The  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  transplant  set  in  as  soon  as 
the  latter  has  entered  into  organic  connections  with  the  host  and  as  soon  as  the 
individuality  differentials  have  had  a  chance  to  diffuse  from  the  transplant 
into  the  host  and  here  to  set  in  motion  a  response  on  the  part  of  the  various 
tissues. 

The  investigations  of  M.  S.  Fleisher  agree  with  our  conclusions.  He  found 
that  immunization  of  an  animal  by  homoiogenous  tissues  did  not  in  any  definite 
way  modify  the  course  of  the  typical  reaction  against  homoiogenous  trans- 
plants. Conditions  were  different  in  the  case  of  heterogenous  grafts ;  here  as  a 
result  of  immunization  there  was  an  increased  accumulation  of  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  around  the  graft  in  the  first  few  days  following  transplanta- 
tion, as  well  as  a  delay  in  the  ingrowth  of  fibroblasts  into  it,  and  furthermore, 
a  reduction  in  the  slight  growth  processes  which  may  take  place  in  a  heterog- 
enous host;  but  these  differences  between  immunized  and  normal  hosts  were 
only  transitory ;  they  soon  subsided.  These  experiments  are  furthermore  in 
agreement  with  the  view  that  heterogenous  tissues  are  more  efficient  sources  of 
antigens  than  are  homoiogenous  ones,  because  the  former  are  more  strange 
and  are  therefore  more  prone  to  initiate  immune  reactions.  However,  it  seems 


162  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

that  also  in  the  case  of  heterogenous  tissues  the  primary  reactions  due  to  the 
preformed  organismal  differentials  are  the  more  essential  factors  on  which 
depend  the  fate  of  the  transplants. 

The  data  so  far  discussed  suggest,  then,  the  interpretation  that  the  reactions 
of  the  host  against  both  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues  are  due  largely 
to  the  direct,  primary  action  of  the  individuality  differentials  given  off  by  the 
transplants,  but  that,  secondarily,  these  differentials  may  also  act  as  antigens 
and  induce  the  formation  of  immune  substances,  which  then  may  secondarily 
intensify  the  strength  of  the  reactions.  However,  it  is  apparent  also  that  by 
means  of  successive  transplantations  it  is  difficult  to  decide  the  question  as  to 
how  far  such  immune  processes  participate  in  these  reactions.  This  method 
suffers  from  the  disadvantages  that  each  transplant  can  be  examined  only  at 
the  end  of  the  experiment  and  that  it  is  necessary  to  study  the  tissue  in  stained 
section.  The  examination  of  the  white  blood  cells  as  a  method  for  the  analysis 
of  the  individuality  differentials  obviates  these  disadvantages,  although  in 
certain  respects  the  study  of  the  local  reactions  around  the  transplanted  tissues 
is  preferable.  By  determining  the  effects  of  two  successive  transplantations  on 
the  white  blood  cells  circulating  in  the  peripheral  blood,  Blumenthal  demon- 
strated the  existence  of  immune  reactions  also  against  transplanted  tissues. 
In  these  experiments,  the  interval  between  the  two  transplantations  was  10  or 
21  days.  In  the  case  of  successive  transplantations  of  homoiogenous  tissues, 
the  second  transplant  called  forth  an  accelerated  increase  in  the  lymphocytes 
in  the  blood.  The  maximum  number  of  these  cells  appeared  from  two  to  four 
days  earlier  than  after  transplantation,  but  the  maximum  number  of  cells 
counted  after  the  second  transplantation  was  not  so  high  as  after  the  first 
transplantation  in  the  large  majority  of  cases.  This  effect  of  a  second  trans- 
plantation was  noted  only  if  both  the  first  and  second  transplant  were  homoi- 
ogenous, but  not  if  one  of  the  two  grafts  was  of  a  heterogenous  nature. 

If  successive  heterogenous  transplantations  were  made,  the  maximum  in 
the  increase  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  as  well  as  of  lymphocytes, 
which  took  place  as  the  second  phase  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the 
transplant,  was  accelerated  to  about  the  same  extent  as  after  successful 
homoiogenous  transplantations.  But,  again,  the  maximum  number  of  cells 
found  in  the  blood  after  the  second  transplantation  was  lower  than  that  found 
after  the  first  transplantation.  In  order  to  obtain  this  effect,  both  the  first  and 
second  transplant  had  to  be  heterogenous ;  again  a  combination  of  a  heterog- 
enous and  a  homoiogenous  graft  did  not  produce  this  effect.  The  immuniz- 
ing effect  of  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissue  on  the  lymphocytes  and 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  in  the  circulating  blood  is  therefore  a  specific 
one.  Immunization  against  the  growth  of  transplanted  homoiogenous  and 
heterogenous  pieces  of  tumors  may,  to  a  certain  degree,  be  accomplished  by  a 
first  transplantation  of  normal  tissues,  and  here,  also,  both  the  first  trans- 
plant of  normal  tissue  and  the  second  transplant  of  tumor  must  be  either 
homoiogenous  or  heterogenous.  We  may  conclude  from  these  experiments: 
(1)  that  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues  differ 
not  only  quantitatively  but  also  in  kind,  and  (2)  that  also  normal  homoiog- 


PROCESSES  OF  IMMUNITY  163 

enous  and  heterogenous  tissue  may  induce  immunity  reactions  against  tumor 
as  well  as  against  normal  tissue.  (3)  These  secondary  immune  reactions  also 
are  relatively  slight  as  compared  with  the  primary  reactions  occurring  as  the 
direct  result  of  the  diffusion  of  the  individuality  differentials  from  a  trans- 
plant into  the  circulation  of  the  host.  The  primary  individuality  differentials 
are  therefore  responsible  for  the  major  portion  of  the  reaction  of  the  host 
against  homoiogenous  tissues ;  but  secondary,  immune  reactions  may  also  par- 
ticipate in  this  reaction,  although  only  to  a  lesser  extent. 

These  investigations  as  to  the  nature  of  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous 
and  heterogenous  tissues  suggested  a  second  problem,  one  which  was  of 
practical  importance  and  which  therefore  interested  surgeons  especially, 
because  its  solution  might  be  an  aid  in  the  grafting  of  homoiogenous  tissues 
in  human  beings.  This  problem  concerned  the  possibility  of  improving  the 
results  of  homoiotransplantations  by  experimental  means.  It  was  thought 
possible  that  in  animals,  through  a  preliminary  treatment  of  the  host  with 
blood  serum  or  plasma,  or  with  tissue  extract  of  the  donor,  the  former 
might  become  desensitized  to  the  effect  of  the  homoiogenous  tissues.  These 
experiments  were,  however,  unsuccessful.  Likewise,  the  treatment  of  the 
transplants  with  similar  substances  from  the  host  previous  to  the  grafting 
did  not  cause  an  accommodation  of  the  'homoiogenous  tissue  of  the  donor 
to  the  conditions  found  in  the  host.  Nor  was  it  possible  by  means  of  para- 
biosis between  donor  and  host  to  prolong  noticeably  the  life  of  the  homoiog- 
enous tissue,  although  under  these  conditions  the  graft  was  supplied  with 
some  of  the  blood  to  which  it  was  adapted.  The  observation  of  Murphy  and 
his  collaborators,  that  by  the  application  of  Roentgen  rays  to  the  host,  and 
by  other  means  which  tended  to  reduce  the  number  of  available  lymphocytes, 
a  more  favorable  outcome  in  the  transplantation  of  homoiogenous  tumors 
could  be  obtained,  induced  surgeons  to  apply  the  same  methods  to  the 
homoiotransplantation  of  normal  tissues,  but  no  real  improvement  was 
attained. 

In  some  of  the  papers  of  earlier  investigators,  in  which  the  question  as 
to  the  causes  of  the  usual  failure  of  homoiogenous  transplantations  was 
discussed,  frequent  reference  is  made  to  a  state  of  anaphylaxis,  resulting 
from  grafting  of  tissues,  as  one  of  the  principal  factors  involved  in  this 
process.  However,  a  statement  as  to  the  nature  of  such  an  anaphylactic  state 
and  its  distinction  from  a  condition  of  immunity  against  the  transplant  in 
the  host  is  not  usually  made.  In  order  to  test  this  assumption  regarding  the 
presence  of  anaphylaxis  in  transplantation,  experiments  were  made  by  us  in 
which  conditions  were  favorable  for  the  development  of  a  state  of  sensitiza- 
tion and  thus  also  for  a  subsequent  state  of  anaphylaxis  in  the  transplant. 
We  sensitized  guinea  pigs  by  injecting  them  with  horse  serum  and  after- 
wards transplanted  pieces  of  uterus,  thyroid  or  ovaries  of  the  sensitized 
animal  into  other  guinea  pigs,  which  had  not  previously  been  injected  with 
horse  serum  but  which  were  injected  sometime  after  they  had  received 
the  transplants.  In  other  experiments  we  transplanted  corresponding  tissues 
from  non-injected  guinea  pigs  into  animals  which  received  an  injection  of 


164  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

horse  serum  during  the  period  following  the  transplantation,  and  in  a  third 
type  of  experiments,  injections  were  given  to  the  host,  both  prior  to  and 
following  transplantation.  It  was  conceivable  that  the  transplanted  tissues 
in  some  of  these  instances  had  been  sensitized  to  horse  serum  and  that  a 
second  injection  of  horse  serum  would  cause  an  anaphylactic  reaction  in  the 
transplant,  which  would  alter  the  state  of  preservation  and  the  lymphocytic, 
connective-tissue  and  blood-vessel  reaction  of  the  host  towards  the  transplant. 
However,  this  was  not  the  case ;  the  reactions  of  the  host  tissues  against  the 
graft  were  not  essentially  altered  by  these  procedures.  Only  in  a  few  cases, 
in  which  the  general  health  of  the  guinea  pig  serving  as  host  had  been 
affected  by  the  injection  of  horse  serum,  was  a  definite  effect  on  the  trans- 
plant noticeable,  but  it  is  not  probable  that  in  the  last  named  experiments 
we  had  to  deal  with  a  specific  condition  of  anaphylaxis  in  the  transplant. 
As  far  as  our  experiments  make  possible  a  decision  in  this  respect,  it  may 
then  be  concluded  that  a  state  of  true  anaphylaxis  is  not  one  of  the  factors 
which  underlies  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  homoiogenous  transplants. 
As  to  a  possible  improvement  in  the  results  of  homoiogenous  transplantation, 
only  one  method  appeared  to  be  able  to  exert  such  an  effect,  and  this  was 
the  inactivation  of  the  reticulo-endothelial  system  by  means  of  injection  of 
trypan  blue  into  the  host  previous  to  the  transplantation.  In  the  experiments 
of  Lehmann  and  Tammann,  such  a  procedure  seemed  to  prolong  the  life  of 
the  transplanted  piece  of  skin  to  a  moderate  degree.  In  16  out  of  28  mice  so 
treated,  the  skin  grafts  were  better  preserved  after  having  been  in  the  hosts 
for  four  weeks  than  in  controls;  also,  the  staining  of  the  skin  to  be  trans- 
planted by  trypan  blue  seemed  to  protect  it  to  some  extent  against  the 
antagonistic  processes  which  as  a  rule  take  place  in  the  host  after  trans- 
plantation. Trypan  blue  was  effective  presumably  because,  temporarily,  it 
diminished  the  cellular  response  in  organs  where  the  lymphocytes  are  acti- 
vated by  the  homoiogenous  tissue,  and  also  it  may,  perhaps,  have  neutralized 
primary  antagonistic  constituents  of  the  bodyfluids  which  otherwise  would 
have  acted  on  the  strange  grafts;  furthermore,  it  is  possible  that  the 
individuality  differentials  of  transplanted  skin  infiltrated  with  this  dye  are 
rendered  ineffective  for  a  certain  period.  But  on  the  whole,  these  effects 
are  weak  and  temporary.  The  use  of  trypan  blue  proved  to  be  ineffective 
in  similar  experiments  in  rabbits,  and  Villata  also  obtained  negative  results 
with  this  method  when  applied  to  transplantation  of  bones  and  joints  in 
rabbits.  In  similar  experiments  by  Blumenthal  with  guinea  pigs,  into  which 
trypan  blue  was  injected,  the  rise  in  the  number  of  white  blood  cells  other- 
wise caused  by  the  implantation  of  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues 
was  prevented ;  but  he  noticed  that  when  tryan  blue  exerted  such  an  effect,  the 
transplant  was  surrounded  by  a  peripheral  ring  in  which  this  dye  was 
deposited.  He  concluded,  therefore,  that  it  must  be  left  undecided  whether 
the  deposit  of  the  dye  in  the  periphery  of  the  transplant  inhibited  the  diffusion 
of  the  organismal  differentials  into  the  host,  or  whether  the  trypan  blue 
inhibited  the  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  leucocytes  through  a  blockade  of 
the  reticulo-endothelial  system. 


PROCESSES  OF  IMMUNITY  165 

In  accordance  with  the  relatively  slight  effectiveness  of  this  method,  if 
applied  to  homoiogenous  skin  grafts,  it  was  found  that  splenectomy,  which 
causes  a  partial  elimination  of  the  reticulo-endothelial  system,  was  ineffective 
as  far  as  improvement  in  the  results  of  homoiogenous  transplantation  was 
concerned.  Also,  in  our  experiments  splenectomy  did  not  weaken  noticeably 
the  reactions  of  the  host  against  homoiogenous  transplants  of  thyroid  and 
other  tissues.  There  still  remains  the  method  used  by  Rhoda  Erdmann  for 
this  purpose  in  amphibians,  in  experiments  which  we  shall  discuss  subse- 
quently. In  general,  as  was  to  be  expected  on  theoretical  grounds,  we  may 
then  conclude  that  it  has  not  been  possible  to  change  experimentally  the 
individuality  differentials  of  tissues,  although  it  may  be  possible  to  influence 
the  reactions  of  the  host  against  strange  differentials  by  certain  experimental 
procedures.  As  to  the  reason  why  the  local  reaction  around  transplanted 
normal  tissues  does  not  reveal  definite  processes  of  immunity,  under  condi- 
tions in  which  such  effects  can  be  demonstrated  in  the  case  of  transplanted 
embryonal  or  cancerous  tissues,  this  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that  both  pieces 
of  embryonal  and  of  tumor  tissue,  as  a  rule,  grow  much  more  rapidly  after 
transplantation  and  metabolize  more  actively  than  normal  tissues  and  that 
in  all  probability  the  former  correspondingly  give  off  larger  amounts  of 
effective  antigen. 


Chapter  IJ 

The   Significance  of  the    Individuality    Differen- 
tials in  Transplantation  by  Means  of  Blood  Vessel 
Anastomosis  and  in  Parabiotic  States 

So  far,  the  interaction  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant  and  the  effect  of  various  factors  on  this  interaction  have 
been  considered  under  conditions  of  a  complete  primary  separation  of 
the  grafts  from  the  surrounding  tissues,  only  later  a  union  taking  place 
between  the  transplant  and  the  tissues  of  the  host.  Such  a  transplant  lives 
under  unfavorable  conditions  of  nourishment  during  the  first  few  days 
following  the  transplantation  and  the  central  parts  of  the  graft,  which  suffer 
most  from  insufficient  nourishment,  undergo  necrosis.  This  disadvantage  is 
eliminated  if  directly  after  separation  of  an  organ  or  of  a  part  of  an  animal, 
the  large  blood  vessels,  and  perhaps  even  the  nerves,  of  the  transplant  are 
connected  with  the  corresponding  structures  of  the  host  at  the  site  of  trans- 
plantation. Thus  the  blood  of  the  host  is  carried  at  once  to  all  parts  of  the 
transplant,  which  does  not  then  suffer  from  lack  of  nourishment  and  the 
central  necrosis  is  prevented.  The  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  indi- 
viduality differentials  act,  therefore,  in  this  case,  on  tissues  which  are  well 
provided  with  food  and  should  be  better  able  to  resist  the  unfavorable  action 
of  the  host.  Moreover,  the  individuality  differential  substances  produced  in 
the  transplant,  instead  of  diffusing  slowly  into  the  adjoining  area,  have  a 
chance  to  be  carried  directly  by  vessels  into  the  general  circulation  of  the 
host,  where  they  are  much  diluted.  It  may  therefore  be  expected  that  the 
local  reaction  around  the  transplant,  which  is  so  prominent  a  feature  in  the 
ordinary  kind  of  transplantation,  is  lacking  around  transplants  which  are 
joined  to  the  host  by  means  of  blood  vessels. 

In  parabiosis — a  method  of  transplantation  which  was  first  conceived  and 
applied  by  Paul  Bert,  but  was  technically  developed  in  its  present  form  by 
Sauerbruch  and  Heyde — two  individuals,  usually  belonging  to  the  same 
species,  but  sometimes  also  to  different  species,  are  united  by  establishing 
by  means  of  incisions  and  sutures  a  connection  between  the  peritoneal  cavities 
as  well  as  between  the  skins  of  the  two  animals.  In  parabiosis,  two  indi- 
viduals are  therefore  incompletely  joined  together;  essentially,  both  partners 
continue  their  individual  metabolism  and  functions  of  organs  and  live  their 
own  life,  but  at  the  same  time  some  substances,  including  individuality  dif- 
ferentials, have  a  chance  to  pass  continuously — although  at  a  slow  rate — 
from  one  partner  to  the  other;  this  takes  place  mainly  by  way  of  capillary 
anastomoses,  connections  which  gradually  develop  at  the  site  of  the  peritoneal- 

166 


BLOOD  VESSEL  ANASTOMOSIS  167 

skin  junctions,  but  in  some  cases  there  may  be,  in  addition,  connections 
through  large  omental  blood  vessels.  To  the  peritoneal-skin  union  there  is 
usually  added,  in  parabiosis,  a  union  by  skin  flaps,  which  increases  the  size 
of  the  area  of  vascular  connection  between  the  two  animals.  Characteristic 
of  parabiosis  is,  then,  the  combined  action  of  two  systems  of  bodyfluids  and 
of  two  kinds  of  individuality  differentials  in  the  same  individual;  however, 
there  is  a  great  quantitative  predominance  of  the  animal's  own  constituents 
over  the  strange  ones  carried  to  him  from  his  partner.  There  are  some 
related  parabiotic  states  which  differ  in  various  respects  from  the  typical 
parabiosis  just  described.  Thus  it  is  possible  to  transplant  skin  and  certain 
other  organs  to  a  strange  individual  by  means  of  a  pedicle  containing  blood 
vessels,  which  keeps  the  transplant  united  with  the  original  donor ;  it  then 
received  blood  from  the  latter,  while  at  the  same  time  it  receives  bodyfluids 
from  the  new  host,  and  is  accessible,  to  a  limited  extent,  to  the  action  of  the 
host  cells.  The  union  between  child  and  mother  in  the  uterus,  by  means  of 
the  placenta,  may  also  be  considered  as  a  modified  state  of  parabiosis,  in 
which  both  organisms  lead  largely  an  independent  life  and  in  which  both 
carry  on  their  own  metabolism,  but  in  which  to  a  certain  degree  an  exchange 
of  substances  may  take  place  through  the  placenta.  In  a  still  wider  sense, 
the  condition  of  symbiosis,  or  of  parasitism,  may  be  considered  a  state  of 
parabiosis,  in  which  host  and  symbiont  or  parasite  carry  on  essentially  their 
own  metabolism  and  function,  each  in  its  own  peculiar  manner,  but  in 
which  substances  may  be  exchanged  between  the  two  organisms.  We  are 
concerned  here  with  these  various  conditions  only  in  so  far  as  the  action  of 
individuality  differentials  on  strange  tissues,  organs,  or  whole  individuals 
comes  into  play. 

Transplantation  by  blood  vessel  anastomosis.  Hoepfner  (1903)  first  car- 
ried out  the  retransplantation  of  an  amputated  leg  in  a  dog  by  uniting  blood 
vessels,  muscles  and  skin.  The  dog  died  as  a  result  of  an  accident  after 
eleven  days ;  the  vessels  were  found  free  from  thrombosis ;  skin  and  muscles 
at  the  place  of  union  between  host  and  transplant  showed  satisfactory  healing 
and  there  was  a  tendency  of  the  bones  to  unite.  Several  years  later,  Carrel 
and  Guthrie,  Carrel,  as  well  as  Lexer  and  Giani,  made  similar  experiments ; 
but  Carrel  improved  the  method  of  blood  vessel  anastomosis  and  in  addition 
extended  transplantation  by  this  method  to  kidney,  thyroid,  adrenal  gland 
and  ovaries.  He  believed  that  not  only  autotransplantation  but  also  homoio- 
transplantation  of  arteries  may  succeed.  After  a  few  months,  the  micro- 
scopical structure  of  the  transplanted  vessels  was  almost,  although  not 
entirely,  normal.  Both  Carrel  and  Guthrie  found  that  even  after  hetero- 
transplantation of  carotid  from  dog  to  cat,  the  vessels  were  normal  after 
more  than  one  year.  When  rabbit  vessels  were  grafted  to  a  dog,  the  function 
of  the  artery  was  maintained  for  a  long  time,  but  only  the  connective  tissue 
constituents  of  the  arteries  remained  preserved.  Not  only  autotransplantation, 
but  also  homoiotransplantation,  of  kidney,  thyroid,  adrenal  and  ovary  suc- 
ceeded. The  kidney  functioned,  although  hydronephrosis  and  interstitial 
nephritis  were  observed  in  some  cases  in  the  transplanted  organ.  Likewise, 


168  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

homoiotransplantation  of  a  leg  from  one  fox  terrier  to  another  was  successful. 
The  animal  lived  22  days  after  the  operation,  all  the  tissues  had  healed, 
there  was  no  ulceration,  and  even  regeneration  had  taken  place  when  a  toe  in 
the  grafted  limb  was  injured.  A  callus  united  the  bone  ends.  In  later  experi- 
ments, Carrel  observed,  in  a  homoiotransplanted  kidney,  secretion  of  urine 
for  8  days,  but  the  animal  died  after  ten  days.  After  heterotransplantation 
of  kidney,  the  transplant  was  absorbed  a  few  weeks  later.  Lexer  did  not 
find  it  possible  to  keep  a  transplanted  leg  in  a  dog  alive  for  longer  than 
three  weeks,  and  thrombi  were  found  to  develop  in  the  transplanted  tissues. 
Giani  however  was  more  successful  and  a  leg  autotransplanted  by  him  lived 
for  three  months;  there  was  good  union  but  no  active  motion. 

However,  the  results  of  careful  microscopical  studies  made  by  Borst  and 
Enderlen  on  transplanted  blood  vessels  showed  that  only  autogenous  trans- 
plants survive  for  any  length  of  time;  homoiogenous  and  also  heterogenous 
transplants  gradually  die  and  are  replaced  by  the  tissues  growing  into  the 
transplant  from  the  adjoining  host  tissues  and  wandering  cells  of  the  host 
may  accumulate  at  the  point  of  union.  In  this  place  thrombi  form  more 
frequently  after  homoio-,  and  especially  after  heterotransplantation,  than 
after  autotransplantation.  Autotransplantation  of  thyroid  and  kidney  by 
means  of  blood  vessel  anastomosis  may  succeed ;  but  after  homoiotransplanta- 
tion, hemorrhagic  infarction,  necrosis,  or  atrophy  and  fibrosis  of  the  grafted 
organ  occur.  Likewise  Williamson  found  that  the  homoiotransplanted  kidney 
functioned  only  for  a  few  days,  while  autotransplantation  was  successful, 
except  that  atresia  of  the  ureter  could  cause  hydronephrosis  and  infection  of 
the  graft.  In  case  of  syngenesiotransplantation  of  kidney  within  the  same 
litter  of  dogs,  kidney  function  was  maintained  for  26  days.  As  to  the  length 
of  time  during  which  homoiotransplantation  of  blood  vessels  may  succeed, 
Ingbrigtsen  observed,  in  cats,  that  the  carotids  may  remain  alive  for  three 
months;  among  14  experiments,  8  satisfactory  results  were  obtained.  There 
was  no  thrombosis  in  these  latter  cases,  but  this  did  occur  in  the  other  six. 
Elastic  fibers  of  media  were  normal,  likewise  muscle  cells  were  well  pre- 
served, while  intima  and  adventitia  were  thickened. 

The  interpretation  of  these  investigations,  as  far  as  they  are  of  interest  in 
the  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials,  suffers  from  a  lack  of  distinc- 
tion, in  the  reports  of  the  authors,  between  strict  homoiogenous  and 
syngenesious  (brother-sister)  relationship  in  many  of  the  experiments.  Also, 
too  great  a  reliance  was  placed  on  a  mere  macroscopic  examination  of  the 
transplant,  while  careful  microscopic  studies  of  successive  stages  in  such 
transplantations  were  omitted.  Furthermore,  these  experiments  were  made 
largely  from  the  viewpoint  of  the  surgeon,  who  is  interested  in  the  possibility 
of  using  such  methods  of  transplantation  in  patients.  Notwithstanding  the 
difficulties  involved  in  a  correct  interpretation  of  the  results  of  these  investi- 
gations, and  of  other  similar  ones,  which  need  not  be  discussed,  it  may  be 
concluded  that  there  is  a  marked  difference  between  the  fate  of  autogenous, 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  parabiotic  transplants.  The  former  may  live 
indefinitely  if  unfavorable  conditions  of  a  more  or  less  accidental  kind  can  be 
avoided,  whereas,  the  two  other  types  of  transplants  in  all  probability  die  as  a 


BLOOD  VESSEL  ANASTOMOSIS  169 

rule.  Difficulties  arise  in  the  latter  two,  at  the  place  of  junction  between  the 
vessels  of  donor  and  host  because  of  tissue  and  bodyfluid  incompatibility,  and 
thrombi  often  develop,  but  even  without  such  thrombi,  other  than  autogenous 
tissues  are  injured  and  ultimately  succumb.  This  applies  also  to  homoio-  and 
heterotransplanted  organs,  which  apparently  regress  relatively  soon  after 
transplantation.  There  is  some  difference  of  opinion  as  to  the  length  of 
time  during  which  transplanted  pieces  of  arteries  can  remain  alive,  but  this 
seems  to  be  a  point  of  less  importance.  Certain  connective  tissue  structures 
may  live  presumably  longer  than  the  more  sensitive  constituents  of  these 
transplants. 

From  a  theoretical  point  of  view,  these  transplantations  by  blood  vessel 
anastomosis  are  of  special  interest,  because  they  make  possible  a  separation 
of  the  effects  of  the  bodyfluids  on  transplanted  tissues  from  those  of  the 
host  cells.  The  latter  effects  are,  in  all  probability,  as  far  as  the  incomplete 
reports  on  the  results  of  microscopical  examination  make  an  evaluation  of 
this  factor  possible,  either  entirely  lacking  or  very  slight  under  the  given 
conditions  of  experimentation.  It  is  essentially  the  injurious  action  of  body- 
fluids,  carrying  disharmonious  individuality  and  species  differentials  from 
the  host  to  the  grafted  tissues,  which  accomplishes  the  destruction  of 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues  and  organs.  However,  those  investi- 
gators who  express  an  opinion  as  to  the  cause  of  the  lack  of  success  of 
homoio-  and  heterotransplantations,  as,  for  instance,  Borst  and  Lexer,  stress 
two  specific  factors.  In  the  first  place,  it  is  assumed  that  the  homoiogenous 
and  heterogenous  transplants  cannot  make  use  of  the  specific  foodstuffs  of 
the  host  and,  therefore,  after  using  up  their  own  reserve  material,  they 
starve,  and  that  secondly,  cytolysins  or  related  immune  substances  develop 
as  a  result  of  processes  of  immunization  taking  place  in  the  host.  Even 
Borst,  who  emphasizes  the  biochemical  differences  between  host  and  trans- 
plant as  the  primary  cause  of  the  state  of  athrepsia  and  immunization,  has 
in  mind  specificities  inherent  in  various  organs  and  tissues,  which  require 
not  only  the  adequate  nourishment  but  also  the  normal  function  of  these 
structures  in  order  to  overcome  adverse  conditions.  Biochemical  differences, 
in  the  way  he  applies  this  term,  refer  largely  to  or  include  the  tissue 
differentials.  This  concept  differs  therefore  from  that  which  holds  the 
differences  in  individuality  and  organismal  differentials  as  primarily  re- 
sponsible for  the  changes  characteristic  of  the  various  types  of  transplantation. 

Transplantation  by  pedicled  flaps.  It  is  especially  in  skin  transplantation 
that  pedicled  flaps  are  used.  This  method  of  grafting  tissue  resembles  trans- 
plantation by  blood  vessel  anastomosis,  in  so  far  as  the  transplant  has,  from 
the  beginning,  a  satisfactory  blood  supply,  reaching  it  in  this  instance  through 
the  vessels  of  the  pedicle,  which  originate  in  the  donor  of  the  skin  graft. 
Secondarily,  the  skin  flap  makes  connection  with  the  vessels  of  the  host,  from 
whom  it  then  also  receives  blood.  Thus  its  own  blood  vessels  carry  to  the 
transplant  substances  bearing  autogenous  individuality  differentials,  while 
the  blood  vessels  coming  from  the  host  carry  to  it  substances  bearing  strange 
individuality  differentials.  The  pedicle-flap  mode  of  transplantation,  there- 
fore, differs  from  that  by  blood  vessel  anastomosis,  which  has  just  been 


170  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

discussed,  in  that  in  the  latter  case  the  transplant  is  supplied  exclusively 
with  the  blood  of  the  host.  However,  in  addition  experiments  have  been 
carried  out  in  which,  first,  two  animals  were  united  by  parabiosis  and  then 
various  organs  were  transplanted  by  blood  vessel  anastomosis  from  one 
partner  to  the  other.  Likewise,  skin  has  been  quite  commonly  transplanted  by 
means  of  pedicled  flaps  to  a  parabiotic  partner.  Indeed,  the  transplantation 
of  pedicled  skin  flaps  from  one  animal  to  another  represents  a  rudimentary 
parabiosis.  If  a  pedicled  skin  flap  is  transplanted  to  another  region  in  the 
same  individual,  and  the  pedicle  is  cut  after  healing  has  taken  place,  the 
transplant  may  continue  to  live  during  the  lifetime  of  the  person  or  animal. 
In  the  case  of  homoiogenous  transplantation  the  skin  graft  remains  pre- 
served usually  as  long  as  the  skin  is  united  by  the  pedicle  with  the  circulation 
of  the  donor  and  the  transplanted  tissue  receives,  through  the  blood,  sub- 
stances carrying  its  own  individuality  differentials.  During  that  period  it 
is  sufficiently  under  the  influence  of  autogenous  substances  to  be  able  to 
resist  the  action  of  homoiotoxins  which  are  active  at  the  point  of  union. 
But  if,  after  healing  has  taken  place,  the  pedicle  is  cut,  the  transplant  is 
fully  exposed  to  the  antagonistic  reaction  of  the  host  cells,  as  well  as  to  the 
homoiotoxins  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  and  its  fate  does  not  differ  from 
that  of  the  ordinary  homoiogenous  transplant,  the  advantage  gained  by  the 
flap  method  being  merely  temporary.  It  seems  that,  as  in  skin  transplantation 
by  the  ordinary  method,  so  also  by  the  pedicle-flap  method,  after  the  pedicle 
is  cut,  the  transplant  may,  at  least  in  some  cases,  survive  for  a  longer  time, 
perhaps  even  permanently,  provided  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  graft  are  relatively  harmonious,  which  may  be  expected  especially  if 
syngenesiotransplantations  are  carried  out.  Thus  Lexer  succeeded  in  keeping 
alive  for  eight  weeks  a  skin-flap  transplant  from  daughter  to  father.  In 
this  case,  the  father  received  daily  injections  of  blood  serum  from  the 
donor;  when  these  injections  were  interrupted,  the  skin  flap  no  longer  re- 
mained preserved  but  was  cast  off  by  the  host.  Lexer  attributed  this  result 
to  the  favorable  action  of  the  injections  of  donor  serum,  supplying  suitable 
foodstuffs  for  the  transplant;  but  later  experiments  in  animals  by  Lexer 
and  Keysser  showed  that  such  serum  injections  do  not  exert  a  beneficial 
effect  on  the  transplant  and  it  may  be  assumed  that  the  near  relationship 
of  the  individuality  differentials  of  transplant  and  host  was  responsible  for 
the  favorable  results  obtained. 

Transplants  of  organs  by  blood  vessel  pedicles  to  a  parabiotic  partner 
do  not  behave  differently  from  corresponding  pedicled  skin  transplants ;  the 
grafted  organs  undergo  the  fate  of  ordinary  homoiogenous  transplants  and 
die  after  the  pedicle  has  been  cut.  We  see,  then,  that  it  is  essentially  the 
relationship  of  the  individuality  differentials  which  determines  the  outcome 
in  these  transplantations,  as  it  does  in  those  of  the  ordinary  type.  However, 
it  seems  that  in  man,  not  only  strange  individuality  differentials  but  also 
blood  group  antigens  (A)  may  pass  from  one  partner  through  the  vessels 
connecting  the  skin  flap  to  the  other  partner,  causing  in  the  latter  the  pro- 
duction of  antibodies  and  leading  here  to  the  destruction  of  the  blood  cor- 
puscles possessing  the  antigen  A.  This  occurrence  was  observed  by  Lauer. 


BLOOD  VESSEL  ANASTOMOSIS  171 

But  it  is  doubtful  whether  such  an  occurrence  would  take  place  in  rodents, 
in  which  experiments  of  this  kind  are  carried  out  most  frequently;  here, 
apparently,  the  actions  of  the  individuality  differentials  greatly  predominate 
over  blood  group  antigens,  if  the  latter  play  any  significant  role  at  all  in 
these  animals.  The  same  considerations  would  apply  also  as  far  as  the 
interaction  of  the  partners  in  typical  parabiosis  is  concerned;  here,  too,  it 
is  very  doubtful  whether  in  experiments  in  organisms  other  than  man  and 
monkeys,  blood  group  antigens  would  be  of  any  importance.  But  in  the 
latter,  they  may  be  effective,  and  in  man  also  the  stage  of  pregnancy  may 
be  of  importance.  In  women  it  has  been  observed  that  especially  the  antigen 
Rh  may  pass  from  the  fetus  to  the  mother,  causing  the  production  of  anti- 
bodies which  then  may  lead  to  changes  in  the  fetus  (Wiener,  P.  Levine). 

Parabiosis  and  individuality  differentials.  Parabiosis  is  an  extension  of  the 
method  of  transplantation  by  pedicle  flaps,  in  which,  in  addition,  union 
usually  takes  place  between  two  individual  organisms  by  the  joining  together 
of  small  areas  of  the  peritoneal  wall,  and,  in  some  cases,  also  of  the  intestines. 
However,  it  is  a  method  devised  primarily  for  the  purpose  of  joining  to- 
gether or  transplanting  on  each  other,  two  organisms  which  are  able  to  live 
independently,  and  which,  in  certain  respects,  continue  to  live  independently 
even  after  the  union  has  been  accomplished.  Each  organism  takes  its  own 
food  and  maintains  its  own  metabolism ;  each  is  united  with  its  partner 
mainly  by  means  of  capillary  anastomoses,  which  gradually  increase  up  to 
about  two  weeks  after  operation,  after  which  time  there  may  be  again  a 
diminution  in  the  number  of  anastomosing  capillaries  owing  to  the  pressure 
exerted  by  the  developing  scar  at  the  site  of  junction.  It  has  been  found  that 
the  connection  by  lymph  vessels  is  richer  than  that  by  blood  capillaries ; 
occasionally,  though,  there  may  be  an  additional  connection  by  large  vessels 
in  the  omentum.  The  partners,  corresponding  to  host  and  transplant,  continue 
therefore  to  be  perfused  largely  by  their  own  blood  supply;  but,  at  the 
same  time  a  not  very  intense,  but  continuous,  inflow  of  strange  body  fluids 
occurs,  thus  transferring  to  one  partner  products  of  the  intermediary  metab- 
olism from  the  other  partner,  and  above  all,  transferring  also  substances 
carrying  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  other  partner. 

Locally,  at  the  point  of  union,  at  first  a  large  amount  of  granulation 
tissue  develops,  consisting  largely  of  fiibroblasts  but  containing  also  various 
kinds  of  leucocytes;  it  is  uncertain  whether  this  abundant  tissue  formation 
represents  merely  the  sum  of  that  which  would  normally  be  furnished  by 
each  partner  in  the  course  of  wound  healing,  or  whether  in  addition  the  in- 
fluence of  substances  strange  to  each  partner  exerts  a  special  stimulation  on 
the  granulation  tissue.  In  contrast  to  the  blood  vessels  of  the  two  organisms 
which  communicate  with  each  other  and  may  grow  from  one  animal  into  the 
territory  of  the  other,  no  spontaneous  ingrowth  of  peripheral  nerves  takes 
place,  the  nerves  of  each  organism  remaining  separate.  This  is  probably  the 
reason  why  diseases  like  rabies  or  tetanus,  which  are  propagated  mainly  by 
way  of  peripheral  nerves,  do  not  in  parabiosis  progress  spontaneously  from 
one  partner  to  the  other.  However,  as  Morpurgo  has  shown,  it  is  possible  to 
establish  experimentally  a  union  of  a  nerve  of  one  partner  with  a  nerve  of 


172  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  second  partner,  and  then  an  ingrowth  of  a  peripheral  nerve  into  the  second 
animal  may  take  place  and  cross-reflexes  between  the  two  partners  can  be 
established.  Apart  from  these  data,  the  sequence  of  events  taking  place  in  the 
tissues  adjoining  the  area  of  union  has  not  yet  been  sufficiently  examined 
microscopically  to  determine  whether  at  this  point  accumulations  of  lympho- 
cytes occur  comparable  to  those  which  are  found  around  and  in  the  ordinary 
transplants  of  homoiogenous  tissues.  However,  it  is  conceivable  that  the 
constant  supply  of  its  own  bodyfluids  to  the  tissue  of  each  partner  alters  the 
reaction  of  the  lymphocytes  to  the  strange  tissue  of  the  parabiotic  partner, 
which  would  otherwise  be  found. 

The  general  changes  occurring  at  the  site  of  union  may  vary  greatly  in  dif- 
ferent cases.  In  some  instances,  the  tissues  of  the  two  partners  may  not  unite 
well  and  may  separate  soon  after  the  operation ;  or  a  temporary  union  may  oc- 
cur, which  is  followed  before  very  long  by  a  separation ;  again,  there  may  be 
a  long-continued  union,  which  still  may  ultimately  be  succeeded  by  a  shrink- 
ing of  the  skin  flaps  and  a  separation.  In  the  majority  of  experiments  the 
union  seems  to  last  not  longer  than  a  few  weeks,  but  Morpurgo  succeeded  in 
keeping  a  pair  of  parabiotic  rats  united  for  9-12  months,  and  one  case  is 
known  in  which  the  union  between  two  rats  continued  for  as  long  as  two 
years  and  five  months  (Goto).  Rats  are  apparently  best  suited,  and  rabbits 
next  best,  for  parabiotic  union,  and  it  seems  that  union  between  other 
species,  such  as  cats  or  dogs,  and  perhaps  even  mice,  can  be  established  only 
with  greater  difficulty.  The  results  of  parabiosis  are  most  favorable  between 
young  litter  mates  of  about  the  same  weight  and  sex;  however,  a  union 
between  rats  not  belonging  to  the  same  litter  nor  to  the  same  sex  also  may 
succeed,  but  for  technical  reasons  it  is  advisable  to  choose  partners  of  about 
the  same  age.  As  stated,  the  establishment  of  a  syngenesio-parabiosis,  where 
the  partners  are  brothers  or  sisters,  is  most  favorable,  although  a  homoi- 
ogenous parabiosis  may  also  succeed,  but  on  the  average  less  readily.  Still 
more  difficult  are  unions  between  different  races;  but  Irwin  joined  success- 
fully different  races  of  doves.  A  parabiotic  union  between  individuals  be- 
longing to  different  species  (heterogenous  parabiosis)  may,  in  rare  instances, 
succeed  for  a  very  short  time;  thus  Lambert  joined  a  rat  and  a  mouse  for  a 
maximum  period  of  eight  days,  and  even  a  union  between  a  guinea  pig  and 
rat  succeeded  for  as  long  as  eight  days.  However,  under  these  conditions 
no  real  wound  healing  occurred  at  the  point  of  union  and  afterwards  the 
skin  flaps  separated  as  in  cases  of  disharmonious  homoiogenous  union. 

In  parabiosis,  a  small  amount  of  blood,  of  peritoneal  fluid,  of  lymph  and 
interstitial  fluid  constantly  passes  from  one  partner  into  the  other  and  here 
it  is  mixed  with  a  much  larger  quantity  of  the  animal's  own  fluids.  There  is 
reason,  therefore,  for  assuming  that  the  fluids  of  one  animal  reach,  the  cells 
of  the  strange  organism,  but  only  in  very  great  dilution,  and  before  they  come 
into  actual  contact  with  the  cells  of  the  partner,  they  meet  a  current  of  fluid 
from  the  latter  passing  in  the  opposite  direction,  namely,  from  the  cells  to- 
wards the  capillaries.  The  tissues  thus  constantly  create  their  own  indi- 
viduality differentials,  which  move  towards  and  mix  with  the  very  dilute 
strange  differentials  in  such  a  way  that  a  gradient  of  these  differentials  de- 


BLOOD  VESSEL  ANASTOMOSIS  173 

velops.  Hence  the  action  of  the  bodyfluids  of  one  partner  on  the  other 
is  very  imperfect.  We  notice,  accordingly,  that  substances  which  have  a 
relatively  low  molecular  weight  and  are  not  colloidal,  such  as  KI,  also  prod- 
ucts of  the  intermediary  metabolism  and  certain  toxins  pass  readily  from  one 
partner  to  the  other.  Other  substances  which  have  presumably  larger  mole- 
cules, with  more  colloidal  properties,  or  substances  such  as  some  hormones 
which  have  strong  affinities  for  organs  in  their  own  body  and  are  here  held 
back  more  readily,  pass  with  greater  difficulty  and  only  under  favorable 
conditions  from  one  partner  to  the  other.  For  instance,  following  extirpa- 
tion of  the  kidneys  of  one  partner,  it  is  this  partner  which  is  primarily  af- 
fected by  the  lack  of  these  excretory  organs ;  it  suffers  therefore  from 
edema,  also,  in  some  cases,  from  hypertrophy  of  the  left  ventricle  of  the 
heart,  and  only  under  favorable  circumstances  can  the  compensatory  hyper- 
trophy which  may  occur  in  this  animal  save  it  from  death  by  uremia 
(Morpurgo). 

Similarly  the  interaction  between  the  sex  hormones  takes  place  only  im- 
perfectly between  the  two  partners,  but  castration  of  one  partner  may  exert 
a  stimulating  effect  on  the  sex  organs  of  the  other  partner  through  the 
intermediation  of  the  hypophysis  (P.  E.  Smith,  Matsuyama.  Kellars,  Mar- 
tins, and  others).  If  a  pregnant  and  a  pon-pregnant  rat  are  united,  a  growth 
may  set  in  also  in  the  mammary  gland  of  the  non-pregnant  partner,  but 
the  reaction  in  the  latter  is  weaker  and  delayed,  indicating  that  some  inhibi- 
tion exists  in  the  transmission  of  this  effect.  A  passive  immunity  can  be  readily 
transferred  from  one  partner  to  the  other,  but  an  active  immunity  can  be 
induced  in  one  animal  through  injections  of  the  antigen  into  his  partner  only 
with  greater  difficulty;  larger  quantities  of  antigen  must  be  used  for  this 
purpose.  Likewise,  if  an  animal  susceptible  to  leukemia  is  united  by  means 
of  parabiosis  with  a  partner  not  susceptible  to  this  disease,  both  individuals 
retain  their  specific  degree  of  resistance  to  it,  the  leukemia  being  transmitted 
only  to  the  susceptible  individual ;  but  transmission  is  more  readily  effected 
by  injecting  the  leukemic  blood  cells  into  the  susceptible  animal  directly 
than  by  injecting  them  into  the  non-susceptible  partner.  Also,  in  the  case  of 
a  difference  in  susceptibility  to  transplanted  tumors  between  two  partners, 
as  a  rule  each  partner  retains  its  specific  state  of  susceptibility  or  lack  of 
susceptibility;  only  in  the  case  of  Jensen  rat  sarcoma  Zakrzewski  observed 
that  a  Wistar  rat,  not  susceptible  to  this  tumor,  can  be  made  susceptible  to 
it  by  the  parabiotic  union  with  a  susceptible  Warsaw  rat.  According  to 
Simonnet  and  Pretresco,  if  a  normally  faster  growing  male  rat  and  a  more 
slowly  growing  female  rat  are  joined  in  parabiosis,  the  growth  rate  of  the 
partners  is  intermediate  between  the  normal  developmental  rates  of  the  two 
partners;  an  effect  is  thus  transmitted  in  this  case  from  each  partner  to  the 
other. 

As  to  the  general  effect  of  two  parabiotic  partners  on  each  other,  it  is 
possible,  in  many  instances,  to  distinguish  two  successive  phases.  As  a  rule 
there  is  at  first  a  harmonious  phase,  in  which  both  animals  are  relatively 
strong ;  this  is  followed  sooner  or  later  by  a  disharmonious  phase,  in  which  one 
of  them  becomes  weak  and  atrophic,  and  eventually  may  die;  but  also  the 


174  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

surviving,  dominating  animal  is  usually  not  quite  so  well  as  it  would  have 
been  in  the  free  state.  In  this  disharmonious  phase  the  tone  of  the  blood 
vessels  is  gradually  lowered,  especially  in  the  weaker  partner  and  towards 
the  end  of  its  life,  consequently  the  stronger  partner  pumps  a  considerable 
part  of  its  blood  into  the  weaker  one,  which  thus  becomes  hyperemic  and 
polycythemic,  while  the  dominating  partner  is  made  anemic.  The  diminished 
erythrocyte-destroying  function  of  the  spleen  of  the  weaker  animal  has  also 
been  held  responsible  for  the  developing  polycythemia.  In  this  animal  there 
are,  in  addition,  atrophic  changes  in  the  inner  organs  and  at  last  a  fibrosis 
of  the  bone  marrow  may  occur ;  in  the  stronger  partner  there  occurs,  on  the 
contrary,  a  stimulation  of  the  various  lymphatic  organs  and  of  the  bone 
marrow,  with  corresponding  changes  in  the  circulating  cellular  elements 
originating  in  the  bone  marrow.  Nodules  consisting  of  reticular-endothelial 
tissue  may  develop  and  accumulations  of  plasma  cells  may  appear  in  the 
connective  tissue.  As  a  rule,  the  weaker  hyperemic  partner,  whose  heart  is 
overloaded  with  blood,  dies  first,  but  occasionally  the  dominating  though 
anemic  partner  may  succumb  earlier. 

As  to  the  cause  of  the  disharmony  which  may  develop,  as  early  as  in  the 
second  or  third  week  after  the  union  has  been  established,  but  much  later 
in  other  cases,  various  suggestions  have  been  made.  Which  of  the  two 
partners  will  be  the  less  resistant  one  and  will  be  ultimately  suppressed 
seems  usually  to  be  determined  by  accidental  factors,  such  as  the  presence 
of  some  inferiority,  as  for  instance,  lack  of  a  kidney,  at  the  time  when 
parabiosis  was  established.  The  fact  that  disharmony  develops  at  all  has 
been  attributed  by  some  investigators  to  a  state  of  undernourishment,  on 
the  assumption  that  the  stronger  partner  deprives  the  weaker  one  of  food- 
stuffs ;  however,  the  weaker  partner  often  consumes  a  large  amount  of  food 
and,  also,  the  stronger  partner  may  lose  somewhat  in  weight.  According  to 
Hermannsdorfer,  disharmony  arises  from  the  passing  of  intermediary 
metabolic  products  from  one  animal  to  the  other.  The  increased  toxicity  of 
the  urine  in  parabiotic  animals,  as  indicated  by  the  production  of  convul- 
sions in  other  animals  injected  with  such  urine,  has  been  considered  as  due 
to  these  substances.  However,  it  is  not  probable  that  such  metabolic  products, 
which  are  present  and  are  about  the  same  in  all  normal  individuals  of  the 
same  species,  are  the  essential  cause  of  the  disharmonious  state. 

Another  view  as  to  the  underlying  factor  in  this  condition  is  held  by  a 
number  of  authors,  who  believe  that  a  state  of  chronic  anaphylaxis  exists, 
due  to  the  constitutional  biochemical  differences  between  the  two  partners, 
such  differences  arising  from  inherited  differences  in  various  organs.  The 
dilatation  of  the  vessels  which  is  observed  in  the  weaker  partner  is  often 
cited  as  an  important  argument  in  favor  of  this  view ;  but,  this  condition  of 
the  vascular  system  may  be  the  result  of  general  weakness  rather  than  of 
specific  anaphylaxis.  Furthermore,  if  the  two  partners  during  the  phase  of 
disharmony  are  separated,  a  recovery  of  both  may  take  place,  and  if  subse- 
quently, parabiosis  is  re-established,  no  sign  of  hypersensitiveness  becomes 
noticeable.  Moreover,  the  production  of  the  well-known  immune  substances, 
such  as  hemolysins,  agglutinins,  or  precipitins,  can  not  usually  be  demon- 


BLOOD  VESSEL  ANASTOMOSIS  175 

strated  in  parabiosis,  although  it  seems  that  under  special  conditions  hemol- 
ysins may  develop.  Thus  Irwin  found  that  in  two  different  races  of  doves, 
in  which  no  blood  groups  can  be  shown  to  exist,  hemolysins  may  be  pro- 
duced ;  but  in  this  case  we  have  to  deal  not  with  a  homoiogenous  parabiosis, 
but  with  one  approaching  a  heterogenous  type.  Also,  Majeda  states  that  he 
has  observed  the  presence  of  hemolysins  in  a  few  cases.  But  the  other 
investigators  who  have  searched  for  hemolysins  in  parabiosis  did  not  find 
them ;  or  in  those  instances  in  which  they  were  present,  they  had,  in  all 
probability,  not  been  produced  in  response  to  the  action  of  blood  group 
antigens  in  the  other  partner,  the  existence  of  which  could  not  be  established, 
but  they  may  have  been  due  to  the  antigenic  action  of  certain  heterogenous 
or  homoiogenous  gene  sets  or  their  derivatives.  The  usual  absence  of  the 
ordinary  immune  substances  in  parabiosis  renders  improbable  also  the  exist- 
ence of  antibodies  responsible  for  a  state  of  anaphylaxis. 

We  suggested  (1930)  the  possibility  that  substances  which  carry  the 
individuality  differentials  are  given  off  in  small  quantities  by  various  organs 
of  one  partner  and  enter  the  circulation  of  the  other,  and  that  these  may 
account  for  the  gradually  developing  disharmony,  the  increasing  atrophy  of 
organs,  and  the  weakness  in  the  partner  which  was  inferior  from  the  be- 
ginning. Such  substances  may  be  expected  to  stimulate  the  lymphocytic  and 
also  the  reticulo-endothelial  system  of  tKe  other  partner,  in  accordance  with 
the  usual  stimulation  of  lymphocytes  in  ordinary  homoiogenous  transplanta- 
tion. These  homoiogenous  substances  may  thus  conceivably  function  as  very 
slowly  acting  toxins  and  secondarily  may  give  origin  also,  although  only 
feebly,  to  immune  substances  specifically  directed  against  the  individuality 
differentials  of  the  partner. 

In  favor  of  this  view,  several  facts  may  be  cited :  in  the  first  place  there 
is  a  parallelism  between  the  genetic  relationship  of  the  parabionts  and  the 
rapidity  with  which  disharmony  is  established  and  the  intensity  of  the  latter. 
As  we  have  mentioned,  the  success  of  parabiosis  essentially  parallels  the 
relationship  of  host  and  donor,  in  the  same  sense  in  which  success  of  trans- 
plantation depends  upon  this  factor;  as  in  syngenesiotransplantation,  es- 
pecially in  inbred  strains,  where  the  reaction  against  the  transplant  may 
become  manifest  only  after  a  long  period  of  latency,  so  also  under  favorable 
conditions  of  parabiosis  the  stage  of  disharmony  may  develop  only  after  a 
long  preceding  harmonious  state.  Furthermore,  the  healing  of  the  skin  flap 
at  the  site  of  union  of  the  parabionts  behaves  in  a  way  which  approximately 
corresponds  to  the  genetic  or  pedigree  relationship  of  the  two  partners ;  the 
healing-in  succeeds  the  better  the  more  compatible  the  two  partners  are 
with  each  other  and  the  longer  the  harmonious  phase  lasts  (Gohrbandt). 
During  the  disharmonious  state  it  is  especially  the  stronger  partner  which 
reacts  more  markedly  against  the  skin  flap.  Of  special  interest  in  this  respect 
are  also  the  experiments  of  Majeda,  who  transplanted  skin  from  one  rat 
to  another  preceding  and  following  the  establishment  of  parabiosis.  He  found 
that  those  animals  between  which  skin  could  readily  be  exchanged  and  re- 
main preserved  for  some  time  were  better  adapted  for  parabiosis  experi- 
ments, than  were  other  animals  in  which  skin  transplants  did  not  heal  in  a 


176  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

satisfactory  manner;  if  animals  of  the  latter  type  were  used,  disharmony 
appeared  earlier.  Inasmuch  as  the  conclusion  is  justified  that  the  local  re- 
actions affecting  transplanted  skin  are  due  to  the  action  of  strange  individu- 
ality differentials,  it  seems  also  justifiable  to  conclude  that,  essentially,  dif- 
ferences in  individuality  differentials  are  the  cause  of  the  disharmony  which 
develops  sooner  or  later  in  parabionts.  Schoene,  Majeda,  and  others,  found 
furthermore  that  instead  of  improving  the  outcome  of  homoiogenous  trans- 
plantation of  skin,  parabiosis,  on  the  contrary,  seemed  to  make  the  results 
more  unfavorable,  and  similar  observations  were  made  also  in  autotrans- 
plantation.  It  is  possible  that  the  intensified  injury,  inflicted  upon  homoi- 
ogenous transplants  as  a  result  of  parabiosis,  is  caused  by  an  increase  in  the 
immune  reactions  against  strange  individuality  differentials  taking  place 
under  homoiogenous  conditions.  As  to  the  injurious  effect  on  autogenous 
grafts,  we  must  consider  the  fact  that  a  real  autogenous  transplantation  in 
parabiotic  animals  is  not  possible,  inasmuch  as  homoiogenous  individuality 
differentials,  even  if  much  diluted,  are  continuously  given  off  by  the  partner 
and  must,  to  some  extent,  affect  the  condition  of  the  autotransplant. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  in  all  probability  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials are  responsible  for  the  injurious  general  as  well  as  local  reactions  affect- 
ing partners  in  parabiosis,  as  for  instance,  for  the  damage  inflicted  on 
transplanted  pieces  of  skin  or  of  other  organs,  but  that  in  addition  to  these 
primary  direct  actions  of  the  strange  individuality  differentials,  also  immune 
reactions  against  these  antigens  may  be  active. 

We  have  referred  already  to  the  analogy  which  exists  between  the  state  of 
pregnancy  and  that  of  parabiosis.  However,  pregnancy  differs  from  true 
parabiosis  in  three  respects :  ( 1 )  In  pregnancy,  we  have  not  to  deal  with  the 
union  of  two  formerly  independent  partners,  able  to  sustain  themselves  in  a 
free  state,  but  with  the  development  of  an  embryo  and  fetus  inside  the 
mother's  organism;  (2)  the  blood  vessel  connections  between  fetus  and 
mother,  by  way  of  the  placenta,  are  much  more  extensive  than  those  exist- 
ing between  true  parabiotic  partners,  and  (3)  the  embryo  and  fetus  receive 
essential  foodstuffs  from  the  mother.  During  pregnancy  there  is  no  indication 
that  strange  individuality  differentials  injure  fetus  or  mother.  Perhaps  an 
enlargement  of  the  lymphatic  organs  which  may  appear  in  the  fetus  might 
point  to  a  late  effect  of  strange  individuality  differentials,  but  this  inter- 
pretation appears  uncertain  at  present.  On  the  other  hand,  it  has  been  shown 
that  in  some  rare  cases  antibodies  may  develop  in  the  mother  against  blood 
group  differentials  present  in  the  fetus,  a  point  which  has  already  been  dis- 
cussed. It  is  probable  that  during  embryonic  and  fetal  development  an  adap- 
tation takes  place  against  strange  individuality  differentials  in  both  mother 
and  fetus. 

Also,  parasitism  may  be  considered  as  a  condition  resembling  parabiosis. 
But  this  condition  differs  from  true  parabiosis  in  the  very  great  inequality 
distinguishing  host  and  parasite.  The  parasite  lives  at  the  expense  of  the  host 
and  is  adapted  in  a  peculiar  manner  to  the  host  and  to  one  or  more  of  its 
organs.  A  further  discussion  of  this  relationship  will  be  taken  up  in  a  later 
chapter. 


Chapter  l8 

Modification  of  the  Reaction  of  the  Host  Against 
Strange  Individuality  Differentials  by  Transplan- 
tation of  Tissues  Into  the  Allantois  of  Chick 
Embryos,  Into  the  Brain,  or  Into  the 
AnteriorlChamber  of  the  Eye 

It  has  not  been  possible  to  prevent  the  injury  or  destruction  of  homoi- 
ogenous  or  heterogenous  transplants  by  immunization  of  the  host  with 
blood  or  tissue  extracts  of  the  donor,  or,  conversely,  by  treating  the 
donor  with  similar  substances  obtained  from  the  prospective  host.  On  the 
other  hand,  in  a  limited  way,  it  was  possible  to  protect  the  transplant  against 
aggression  by  the  host  by  inactivating  the  reticulo-endothelial  system  of  the 
latter  by  means  of  injections  of  trypan  blue.  Previous  to  the  last  mentioned 
observations  it  had  been  shown  that  heterogenous  mammalian  tumors  were 
able  to  grow  in  the  chorio-allantois  of  the  developing  chick  (Rous  and  Mur- 
phy), and  subsequently  the  mechanism  of  this  condition  was  analyzed  by 
Murphy  and  his  collaborators  in  a  series  of  investigations.  Murphy  could 
show  that  after  transplantation  of  a  piece  of  spleen,  and  to  some  extent  also 
of  bone  marrow,  previous  to  or  simultaneously  with  the  transplantation  of 
heterogenous  tumor  or  of  heterogenous  embryonic  tissue  into  the  chorio- 
allantois,  the  transplants  were  destroyed  in  the  same  way  as  they  were  in  adult 
hosts.  The  spleen  tissue  initiated  the  reactions  of  the  embryo-host  which,  in 
the  fully  developed  adult  host,  prevent  the  growth  of  heterogenous  tumors 
and  embryonal  tissues,  and  correspondingly,  the  chicken  embryo  spontaneous- 
ly became  resistant  to  these  strange  transplants  as  soon  as  the  embryonic 
development  had  reached  the  stage  when  the  organs  of  defense  could  function. 
According  to  Murphy,  these  defense  mechanisms  consist  largely  in  the  ac- 
tivity of  the  lymphocytes,  which  call  forth  a  state  of  immunity  in  the  host. 
The  immune  processes  thus  produced  acted  not  only  against  strange  tumors, 
but  they  could  also  inhibit  the  growth  of  autogenous  tumors  and  they  were 
the  same  as  those  which  protected  the  organism  against  pathogenic  micro- 
organisms, such  as  tubercle  bacilli.  All  the  means  which  injure  or  destroy  the 
lymphocytes,  weaken  or  remove  the  immune  processes  in  the  host  and  allow, 
therefore,  tumors  to  grow  or  tuberculosis  to  spread,  while  those  mechanisms 
which  tend  to  stimulate  the  multiplication  and  activity  of  the  lymphocyes,  tend 
to  intensify  the  immune  processes  and  to  protect  the  organism.  By  the  applica- 
tion to  the  host  of  X-rays,  dry  heat,  benzene,  and  certain  other  means  which 
injure  the  lymphocytes,  it  is  therefore  possible  to  enhance  the  growth  of 
malignant  tumors  in  the  organism. 

177 


178  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

As  mentioned  already,  it  is  only  at  a  certain  stage  in  the  embryonic  develop- 
ment that  organismal  differentials  are  fully  developed,  and  there  is  every 
reason  to  assume  that  the  development  of  the  mechanisms  which  are  directed 
against  strange  organismal  differentials  takes  place  only  subsequent  to  the 
complete  formation  of  the  organismal,  and,  in  particular,  of  the  individual- 
ity differentials.  As  we  shall  discuss  more  fully  later,  even  in  the  very 
young  guinea  pig  not  long  after  birth  the  reactions  against  homoiogenous 
tissues  are  weaker  than  in  older  animals.  The  experiments  of  Murphy  suggest 
very  strongly  that  the  spleen  and  the  reticulo-endothelial  system  in  general  are 
the  tissues  which  originate  these  mechanisms  of  defense,  or  at  least  aid  in 
their  development.  We  have  furthermore  seen  that  the  lymphocytes  are  at- 
tracted by  strange  individuality  differentials  and  that  they  may  help  in  the 
destruction  of  homoiogenous  tissues ;  but  it  is  possible  that  also  the  individu- 
ality and  species  differentials,  which  are  attached  to  certain  substances  in  the 
bodyfluids  and  which  exert  a  primary  toxic  effect  on  homoiogenous  and 
heterogenous  tissues,  may  develop  with  the  aid  of  the  reticulo-endothelial 
system.  These  considerations  concerning  the  lack  of  individuality  differentials 
and  of  the  mechanisms  of  reaction  against  the  latter  in  early  embryos,  would 
then  explain  why  the  chorio-allantois  of  the  chick  and,  according  to  Murphy, 
also  the  chick  embryo  as  such,  do  not  oppose  the  preservation  of  heterogenous, 
actively-growing  tissues,  such  as  malignant  tumors  and  embryonal  tissues. 
According  to  Taylor,  Thacker  and  Pennington,  it  seems  that  mammalian 
tumors  grow  very  well  also  in  the  yolk  sac  of  the  chick  embryo. 

There  are  also,  in  adult  animals,  at  least  two  sites  where  heterogenous 
tumor  transplants  may  survive,  namely,  the  brain  and  the  anterior  chamber  of 
the  eye.  Shirai  found  that  heterogenous  tumors,  which  cannot  be  successfully 
transplanted  elsewhere,  may  grow  when  transplanted  into  the  brain.  Murphy, 
who  obtained  similar  results,  observed  that  around  such  heterogenous  trans- 
plants in  the  brain  the  usual  lymphocytic  reaction  is  absent;  but,  as  in  the 
case  of  transplantation  into  the  allantois,  a  lymphocytic  reaction  can  be  called 
forth  if  simultaneously  with  the  grafting  of  the  tumor  a  piece  of  spleen  is 
transplanted  into  the  brain.  However,  when  Harde  transplanted  homoiogenous 
tumors  to  the  brain,  no  differences  in  results  between  the  brain  and  the  usual 
sites  of  transplantations  were  noted.  Siebert  compared  with  the  reactions 
against  tumor  tissue,  those  against  homoiogenous  thyroid  transplants  in  the 
guinea  pig,  the  time  of  the  examination  of  the  graft  varying  between  20  and 
120  days  after  transplantation.  He  found  the  amount  of  homoiogenous  thyroid 
gland  that  was  preserved  in  the  brain  less  than  that  of  autogenous  transplants. 
Much  fibrous-hyaline  tissue  developed  in  or  around  the  homoiogenous  graft. 
After  20  to  30  days,  only  a  few  small  acini  were  preserved  in  the  hyaline 
stroma.  Lymphocytic  infiltration  appeared  in  the  fibrous  tissue  invading  the 
transplant  and  some  scattered  lymphocytes  also  surrounded  the  brain  tissue, 
but  on  the  whole,  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  was  much  less  intense  than  after 
transplantation  into  subcutaneous  pockets.  The  homoiogenous  thyroid  tissue 
remained  longer  preserved  in  the  brain  than  it  is  usually  in  the  subcutaneous 


MODIFICATION  OF  REACTION  OF  THE  HOST  179 

tissue,  and  it  is  possible  that  at  a  later  period  a  moderate  newformation  of 
acini  may  have  taken  place  in  the  graft  in  this  site.  We  may  then  conclude 
that  while  in  and  around  transplants  of  normal  homoiogenous  tissue  the 
lymphocytic  infiltration  is  diminished  in  the  brain,  the  connective-tissue  re- 
action is  at  least  as  marked  as  after  subcutaneous  transplantation.  The  mech- 
anism which  exerts  a  certain  protective  influence  on  homoiogenous  grafts  in 
the  brain  is  therefore  exactly  the  reverse  of  that  which  is  active  in  young,  as 
compared  to  older  hosts.  In  young  hosts  the  connective-tissue  reaction  is 
diminished,  whereas  the  lymphocytic  infiltration  may  be  very  marked;  in  the 
brain,  the  connective-tissue  reaction  may  be  quite  pronounced,  whereas  the 
lymphocytic  infiltration  is  weak.  As  to  the  difference  in  the  mode  of  reaction 
in  brain  and  in  subcutaneous  tissue  of  young  animals,  it  seems  improbable  that 
this  is  caused  by  a  lack  of  individuality  differentials  in  the  brain ;  it  is  more 
probable  that  the  blood-brain  barrier  (L.  Stern)  prevents  the  homoio-toxin 
from  reaching  the  brain  in  full  strength,  or  at  least  diminishes  its  effective- 
ness. However,  the  possibility  cannot  be  excluded  that  also  other  factors  may 
be  involved  in  this  process. 

Likewise  in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  transplantations,  especially  of 
organs  with  internal  secretion,  have  been  shown  to  succeed  better  than  those 
made  subcutaneously  or  intraperitoneally.  Of  considerable  interest  are  the 
intra-ocular  transplantations  of  testicle.  As  a  rule,  the  testes  of  newborn 
animals,  in  particular  those  of  rats,  were  used  in  these  experiments,  for  in- 
stance, in  the  work  of  Pfeiffer,  which  we  have  already  mentioned,  and  in  the 
extensive  investigations  of  G.  D.  Turner;  furthermore,  in  rabbits  (Bayer  and 
Wense)  conditions  seem  to  be  similar.  The  functioning  of  these  transplants 
is  greatly  influenced  by  hormones ;  their  presence  exerts  a  stimulation  favor- 
able to  spermatogenesis  and  their  absence  appears  to  cause  degenerative 
changes  in  the  more  sensitive  cells,  so  that  only  Sertoli  cells  survive.  In  all 
probability,  stimulation  by  certain  hormones  is  necessary  to  ensure  the  survival 
and  function  of  the  most  differentiated  cellular  constituents  of  endocrine 
organs,  particularly  if  these  organs  are  under  environmental  conditions  which 
are  not  quite  adequate.  Because  the  function  of  the  sex  organs  may  inhibit  the 
formation  of  such  stimulating  hormones,  these  transplants  may  be  more  suc- 
cessful in  castrated  than  in  normal  hosts,  and  in  younger,  sexually  immature 
hosts  than  in  older  ones.  However,  it  must  be  mentioned  that  the  very  favor- 
able results  of  Turner  were  due  to  the  fact  that  in  addition  to  the  very  young 
age  of  the  donors,  donors  and  hosts  were  litter  mates  and  the  rats  belonged  to 
an  inbred  strain.  These  conditions  eliminated  to  a  great  extent  the  action  of 
unfavorable  individuality  differentials.  But,  it  seems  that  after  all,  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  of  hosts  and  transplants  were  not  entirely  com- 
patible in  these  experiments,  and  that  under  less  favorable  hormonal  condi- 
tions these  differences  between  the  differentials  could  assert  themselves  and 
cause  an  invasion  of  the  transplant  by  connective  tissue  and  lymphocytes ;  at 
least  this  is  the  interpretation  which  might  be  given  to  some  of  Turner's  ex- 
periments. That  the  organismal  differentials  do  assert  themselves  also  in  the 


180  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  heterogenous  testes 
and  ovaries  survived  only  up  to  20  days,  and  that  at  a  later  date  only  fibrous 

tissue  was  found. 

The  ovary  seems  to  behave  after  intra-ocular  transplantation  in  a  similar 
way  to  the  testis  (Goodman,  as  well  as  Lane  and  Markee)  ;  however,  the 
various  constituents  of  this  organ  are,  on  the  whole,  more  resistant  than  those 
of  the  testis.  In  the  case  of  both  of  these  organs,  hormones  may  affect  not  only 
the  transplants,  but  the  latter  also  give  off  hormones  which  may  leave  the  eye 
and  affect  distant  organs.  In  intra-ocular  transplants  of  seminal  vesicles  and 
prostate  of  the  rabbit,  R.  A.  Moore  and  his  collaborators  have  found  that  the 
effects  of  repeated  stimulation  of  the  transplants  by  hormones  follow  a  definite 
curve;  the  growth  response  is  strongest  in  the  beginning  and  then  soon 

declines. 

In  intra-ocular  transplantations  of  the  adrenal  gland,  conditions  are  in 
principle  similar  to  those  of  the  testicle,  as  a  comparison  of  the  results  of 
adrenal  transplantations  into  the  eye  (Turner)  and  elsewhere  (Wyman  and 
Turn  Suden,  Atwell,  Ingle  and  Higgins)  indicate.  Here  also,  stimulation  by 
the  specific  anterior  pituitary  hormone  which  occurs  especially  in  adrenal- 
ectomized  animals,  is  important.  However,  under  the  more  favorable  condi- 
tions existing  in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  cortical  glomerulosa  tissue 
may  grow,  differentiate,  and  survive  for  a  long  time,  even  in  non-adrenalec- 
tomized  animals ;  in  these  experiments,  also,  the  organs  of  very  young  animals 
were  used  for  grafting.  But  the  stimulation  by  the  pituitary  hormone  in 
adrenalectomized  animals,  or  the  repeated  transplantation  of  pituitary  lobes, 
enhanced  the  growth  and  the  percentage  of  survivals. 

Likewise,  after  intra-ocular  transplantation  of  the  hypophysis  the  grafts 
remain  well  preserved.  The  different  types  of  hypophyseal  cells  are  affected 
in  the  usual  way  by  various  hormones,  and,  conversely,  transplants  of  the 
hypophysis  through  their  own  hormones  may  affect  other  organs  (R.  M. 
May,  Haterius,  Schweizer  and  Charipper,  Martins)  ;  but  as  mentioned  pre- 
viously, pituitary  transplants  survive  for  a  long  time  also  after  subcutaneous 
transplantation  in  mice,  if  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor 
are  relatively  harmonious. 

So  far,  we  have  studied  only  the  fate  of  intra-ocular  transplants  of  tissues 
which  were  very  young  or  were  derived  from  litter  mates  and  which  had, 
therefore,  special  advantages.  However,  in  order  to  differentiate  between  the 
factors  which  distinguish  the  reactions  against  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  and  in  the  subcutaneous  tissue,  it  is 
necessary  to  transplant  into  the  eye  adult  tissue  and,  preferably,  thyroid  gland. 
We  carried  out  heterogenous  as  well  as  homoiogenous  transplantations  of  rat 
thyroid,  into  the  eye  of  the  guinea  pig.  Living  homoiogenous  thyroid  tissue 
was  found  at  various  times  from  20  to  50  days  after  transplantation.  There 
was  a  diminution  of  both  the  intensity  of  the  connective-tissue  and  the  lympho- 
cytic reaction  against  the  transplant,  which  for  this  reason  may  have  shown  a 
slightly  better  preservation.  But  neither  invasion  by  fibrous  tissue  nor  lympho- 
cytic infiltration  was  entirely  lacking  in  and  around  these  transplants.  After 


MODIFICATION  OF  REACTION  OF  THE  HOST  181 

heterogenous  transplantation  of  thyroid  from  rat  to  guinea  pig,  living  acinar 
tissue  was  found  in  two  cases  10  days,  and  in  two  other  cases,  18  days  after 
transplantation;  there  was  formation  of  hyaline  connective  tissue  in  and 
around  these  heterogenous  transplants,  and  in  some  instances  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  collected  around  them.  At  dates  later  than  18  days,  the 
transplants  had  disappeared.  In  this  case,  also,  the  results  were  somewhat 
better  than  in  heterogenous  transplantations  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue. 

If  we  compare  with  these  results,  those  obtained  after  intra-ocular  trans- 
plantations of  malignant  tumors,  the  latter  are  much  more  striking.  In  a 
number  of  instances  it  has  been  possible  to  obtain  active,  continued  growth  in 
the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  where  none  was  found  subcutaneously,  and 
even  heterogenous  tumors,  including  human  tumors,  grew,  in  contrast  to  the 
subcutaneous  grafts  of  this  tissue.  The  difference  between  the  growth  of 
tumors  obtained  in  these  two  sites  is  much  greater  than  that  of  normal  adult 
tissue.  Results  of  this  kind  have  been  recorded  by  Smirnova,  by  Greene,  by 
Greene  and  Saxton,  by  Appel,  Saphir,  Janota  and  Strauss,  and  by  Cheever 
and  Morgan;  but  Greene  found  that  not  all  heterogenous  tumors  could  be 
successfully  transplanted  into  the  eye;  and  the  degree  of  success  seemed  to 
depend  upon  the  original  growth  energy  of  the  tumor  used  for  transplantation. 
In  some  instances,  also  serial  transplantations  in  the  eye  were  successful. 
After  retransplantation  to  the  subcutaneous  tissue,  of  tumors  that  had  grown 
in  the  eye,  the  tumor  cells  died.  The  greater  power  of  survival  and  growth  of 
tumors  in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  as  compared  to  that  of  ordinary 
tissues  is  in  part  probably  due  to  the  greater  growth  momentum  inherent  in 
tumors,  which  leads  to  a  multiplication  of  the  advantages  offered  by  conditions 
in  this  site  as  compared  with  those  present  in  the  subcutaneous  tissue.  How- 
ever it  is  possible  that  still  another  factor  is  active,  namely,  the  diminution 
or  lack  of  immune  substances  in  this  region.  Tumors,  as  a  result  of  their 
growth  in  hosts  bearing  different  individuality  differentials,  as  a  rule  seem  to 
give  rise  to  immune  processes  to  a  higher  degree  than  do  normal  tissues,  per- 
haps at  least  partly  on  account  of  their  increase  in  mass,  which  takes  place 
with  relatively  great  rapidity,  and  tumors  are  very  sensitive  to  the  injurious 
action  of  such  substances,  especially  during  the  first  period  following  trans- 
plantation. In  the  case  of  ordinary  tissues,  as  we  have  seen,  the  primary 
homoio-  and  heterotoxins  are  apparently  very  much  more  important  in  the 
determination  of  their  fate  after  transplantation  than  are  the  immune  sub- 
stances, although  the  latter  may  play  some  role  also ;  however,  in  the  case  of 
tumors  there  is  evidence  that  though  the  primary  homoio-  and  heterotoxins 
likewise  help  to  determine  the  result  after  transplantation,  the  immune  sub- 
stances are  of  much  greater  consequence.  But  it  has  been  shown  by  Becht 
and  Greer,  and  by  Hektoen  and  Carlson,  that  the  titer  of  immune  substances 
is  much  less  in  the  fluids  of  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  than  in  the 
blood,  or  it  may  be  lacking  altogether  in  the  former  when  it  is  present  in 
the  latter  region;  and  more  recently,  Appel,   Saphir,  Janota  and   Strauss 
have   stated  this  to  hold  good  also   for  immune  substances  produced  by 
the  growth  of  the  Brown-Pearce  tumor  in  rabbits.  This  condition  would  help 


182  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  explain  the  special  advantage  which  the  eye  offers  for  the  growth  of  certain 
transplanted  tumors,  as  compared  with  the  subcutaneous  tissue  or  other  sites. 
Against  such  an  interpretation  are  the  recent  experiments  of  Greene,  as  well 
as  those  of  Cheever  and  Morgan,  which  indicate  that  a  transmission  of  im- 
mune processes  may  take  place  between  the  aqueous  humor  of  the  eye  and  the 
circulating  blood,  although  again,  the  results  of  these  investigators,  working 
with  different  types  of  tumors,  differ  as  to  the  degree  to  which  such  an  ex- 
change may  occur.  Moreover,  as  Greene  points  out,  the  growth  of  tumors  is 
enhanced  if  the  testicle  is  used  as  the  site  of  transplantation,  and  in  this  organ 
such  a  barrier  between  blood  and  organ  constituents  does  not,  in  all  proba- 
bility, exist.  Also,  in  other  kinds  of  transplantations  the  testicle  has  been 
found  to  be  a  favorable  site ;  thus,  according  to  Stockard,  homoiotranspJanta- 
tion  of  the  ovary  in  the  salamander  Diemyctylus,  succeeds  only  in  the  testicle ; 
likewise,  the  Pearce-Brown  rabbit  tumor  is  advantageously  propagated  by 
grafting  it  into  the  testicle.  The  most  probable  conclusion  in  regard  to  im- 
mune substances,  at  the  present  time,  seems  to  be  that  a  certain  degree  of 
interference  with  the  exchange  of  these  substances  between  blood  and  the 
fluids  of  the  eye  may  play  some  part  in  favoring  the  growth  of  tumors  in  the 
anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  but  it  may  not  be  the  only  factor  concerned. 
However,  it  is  possible  also  that  the  primary  homoio-  and  heterotoxic  sub- 
stances may  pass  only  with  greater  difficulty  from  the  circulating  blood  or 
lymph  into  the  fluid  of  the  anterior  chamber,  and  that  this  condition  may 
contribute  to  the  advantage  which  transplantation  of  tumors  into  the  eye  has 
as  compared  to  the  subcutaneous  tissue;  furthermore,  fluid  in  this  site  sur- 
rounds a  part  of  the  periphery  of  the  transplant  and  this  may  favor  a  continu- 
ous removal  of  individuality  differential  substances  functioning  as  homoio- 
or  heterotoxins,  from  the  transplant.  But,  as  stated,  there  exists  the  further 
possibility  that  still  other,  as  yet  unknown,  factors  may  cause  a  mitigation  of 
the  injurious  reaction  of  the  host  against  transplants  in  special  locations,  in- 
cluding the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye. 

Transplantations  into  the  eye  have  contributed  additional  information  as  to 
the  effect  of  hormones  on  the  survival  and  growth  of  transplanted  endocrine 
organs.  By  means  of  these  transplantations,  more  evidence  has  been  obtained 
for  the  conclusion  that  various  secreting  cells  living  under  unfavorable  con- 
ditions, may  not  be  able  to  sustain  themselves  without  receiving  stimulation 
by  specific  hormones;  a  certain  degree  of  disharmony  between  the  individu- 
ality differentials  of  host  and  transplant  may  be  one  of  these  unfavorable  con- 
ditions. Strange  individuality  differentials  bringing  about  degenerative  effects 
in  the  transplant,  as,  for  instance,  in  the  ovary  and  adrenal  cortex  may  help 
to  induce  connective  tissue  cells  as  well  as  lymphocytes  to  react  very  strongly 
against  tissues  bearing  these  strange  individuality  differentials,  in  the  man- 
ner already  indicated  in  the  discussion  of  transplantations  of  ovary  and 
adrenal  gland  in  the  mouse.  By  inhibiting  or  preventing  these  degenerative 
alterations,  hormones  may  protect  the  transplanted  tissues  against  these  in- 
tensified reactions,  especially  of  lymphocytes.  It  has  likewise  been  shown 
that  the  activity  of  the  connective  tissue  providing  the  stroma  of  organs  is 


MODIFICATION  OF  REACTION  OF  THE  HOST  183 

partly  conditioned  by  the  activity  of  the  epithelial  tissues.  The  latter  therefore 
help  to  determine  whether  the  stroma  shall  be  cellular  or  fibrous  in  charac- 
ter ;  by  stimulating  the  function  of  the  parenchymatous  tissues,  hormones  may 
thus  indirectly  also  affect  the  character  of  the  stroma.  It  may  then  be  stated 
again  that  one  of  the  factors  which  aids  in  the  survival  and  function  of  certain 
differentiated  and  therefore  sensitive  endocrine  tissues,  is  not  so  much  a  de- 
ficiency in  function  of  the  corresponding  host  organ,  as  a  stimulation  of  the 
transplant  by  the  effective  hormone  of  the  host.  The  deficiency  required  may 
be  merely  a  means  of  accomplishing  a  stimulation  of  the  transplant  by  the 
hormone. 

In  conclusion,  it  follows  from  the  data  discussed  in  this  chapter  that  in 
certain  organs  of  the  adult  host,  or  in  embryonic  structures,  various  special 
conditions  exist,  which  protect  at  least,  to  some  extent  tissues  possessing 
strange  individuality  or  species  differentials  from  the  injurious  action  of  the 
bodyfluids  and  cells  of  the  host,  but  that  the  nature  of  these  mechanisms  is, 
at  the  present  time,  only  imperfectly  understood. 


Chapter  Ip 

The  Relations  Between  Age  and  Individuality 

Differentials 

The  French  surgeon,  Oilier,  observed,  during  the  latter  half  of  the 
last  century,  that  autotransplants  of  skin  and  periosteum  grew  much 
better  in  young  than  in  older  individuals,  where  they  grew  only 
temporarily.  Also,  Schoene  noticed  that  old  age  is  unfavorable  for  trans- 
plantation of  skin  and  that  in  old  rats  even  autotransplantation  may  yield 
bad  results.  Kozelka  found,  in  transplantation  of  skin  into  fowl,  that  the 
adult  host  had  greater  resistance  to  grafts  of  strange  skin  than  the  chick 
and  that  also  the  adult  tissue  is  less  able  to  adapt  itself  to  an  adult  host 
than  the  young  tissue  to  a  very  young  host,  and  furthermore,  that  young 
grafts  in  young  hosts  remain  alive  or  regress  only  slightly  when  the  host 
becomes  older.  He  assumed  that  the  milder  form  of  tissue  antagonism  present 
in  the  host  enabled  it  to  eliminate  the  incompatible  elements,  without  totally 
destroying  the  tissue.  According  to  Pfeiffer,  the  gonads  of  immature  animals, 
and  especially  those  of  immature  rats,  take  more  readily  than  those  of  adult 
rats.  On  various  occasions  we  have  compared  the  reaction  against  strange 
grafts  in  young  and  in  older  rats  and  guinea  pigs.  In  the  young,  inbred 
King  rats  the  reaction  against  transplants  of  various  tissues  was  milder  than 
in  older  rats,  and  not  only  against  transplants  within  the  inbred  strain,  but 
also  against  those  from  hybrids,  in  which  latter  a  constituent  had  entered 
which  was  strange  to  the  member  of  the  inbred  parent  strain  serving  as 
host.  In  experiments  in  mice  we  had  observed  that  in  somewhat  older  mice 
the  reaction  against  the  transplant  was,  in  certain  cases,  stronger  than  in 
very  young  mice,  although  this  did  not  need  to  be  the  case  in  all  experiments. 
In  older  mice,  from  10  months  to  20  months  old,  transplants  of  various 
tissues  from  younger  animals  could  be  as  well  preserved  as  in  younger  hosts, 
and  the  reaction  was  not  noticeably  more  severe  in  these  old  mice  than  in 
younger  adult  mice. 

There  remains  the  problem  as  to  the  mechanism  by  means  of  which  age 
affects  the  transplants  and  in  this  respect  experimental  evidence  is  as  yet 
slight;  it  will  be  necessary  especially  to  consider  separately  the  effect  of  age 
on  the  host  and  on  the  transplanted  tissue.  If  even  in  autotransplantations, 
skin  and  bone  grafting  is  less  favorable  in  older  than  in  younger  individuals, 
this  is  possibly  due  to  the  better  vascularization  and  to  the  greater  tendency 
of  the  connective  tissue  to  remain  more  cellular  and  less  fibrillar  in  younger 
organisms.  This  condition  seems  to  be  independent  of  the  reaction  of  the 
individuals  serving  as  donors  and  as  hosts  against  strange  individuality  dif- 
ferentials ;  it  is  related,  in  all  probability,  to  the  fibrous  changes  in  the  stroma, 

184 


AGE  AND  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS  185 

which  are  characteristic  of  older  age  in  various  organs.  Carrel  has  found 
that  the  blood  serum  of  older  animals  is  less  suitable  as  a  medium  in  which 
tissues  grow  in  vitro  than  is  that  of  younger  individuals.  However,  it  is  not 
certain  that  this  factor  plays  a  significant  role  in  the  living  organism. 

We  approached  this  problem  by  means  of  transplantation  of  the  thyroid 
gland  in  guinea  pigs.  Our  observations  showed  that  within  the  first  10  days  of 
extrauterine  life  of  the  host  the  connective-tissue  and  lymphocytic  reactions 
against  homoiogenous  thyroid  gland  are  less  intense  than  in  adult  hosts. 
Tureen  then  compared,  in  our  laboratory,  transplantations  of  thyroid  glands 
in  which  adult  guinea  pigs  were  the  donors  and  in  which  the  donor-age  was 
therefore  constant,  while  the  age  of  the  host  varied.  In  the  group  of  young 
hosts  the  age  varied  between  4  days  and  5  weeks,  while  in  the  group  of  older 
hosts  variations  in  weight  between  500  and  800  grams  indicated  corresponding 
variations  in  age.  In  the  first  4  or  5  days  the  reaction  was  about  the  same  in 
both  groups.  But  from  then  on  a  difference  developed  :  in  the  older  guinea  pigs 
there  was  a  more  marked  formation  of  fibrous  tissue,  which  destroyed  a  con- 
siderable part  of  the  transplant,  and,  in  the  majority  of  cases,  destroyed  it  en- 
tirely after  20  days  or  more  had  elapsed.  In  the  younger  animals  the  formation 
of  the  fibrous  tissue  was  considerably  less  in  most  of  the  animals  and  the 
thyroid  tissue  was  therefore  better  preserved.  But  in  a  certain  number  of 
instances  there  was  a  marked  fibrous  reaction  also  in  the  younger  guinea  pigs. 
However,  because  in  the  majority  of  the  younger  group  the  preservation  of 
the  gland  was  so  much  better,  the  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials 
were  here  subsequently  given  off  in  larger  quantities ;  these  then  attracted  the 
lymphocytes,  which,  somewhat  later,  surrounded  and  invaded  the  transplant  in 
considerable  numbers  and,  secondarily  injured  it.  In  younger  animals,  as  a 
rule,  there  is  therefore  a  tendency  for  the  homoiogenous  tissue  to  elicit  a  syn- 
genesio  rather  than  a  severe  homoiogenous  reaction.  A  combination  of  homoiog- 
enous individuality  differentials,  and  a  relatively  older  age  of  the  host,  led 
thus  to  an  early  increase  in  the  formation  of  fibrous  tissue  in  or  around  the 
transplant.  Under  the  influence  of  not  well  compatible  individuality  differen- 
tials the  stroma  developing  in  the  transplants  in  adult  animals  is  inclined  to  as- 
sume prematurely  the  fibrous  character  which  is  so  characteristic  of  the  bodily 
structures  in  old  age.  Because  of  these  injurious  effects  grafts  in  older  hosts 
were,  then,  less  liable  to  attract  lymphocytes  than  the  better  preserved  tissues 
of  younger  animals.  But  when  in  older  guinea  pigs  the  preservation  of  the 
thyroid  tissue  happened  to  be  better,  in  such  animals,  also,  a  larger  number 
of  lymphocytes  were  attracted ;  hence  it  is  the  strong  connective-tissue  reac- 
tion in  the  older  animals  which  in  these  instances  caused  the  difference  in 
the  fate  of  the  graft  in  the  old  and  in  the  young  guinea  pigs.  Whether  an 
increased  toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids  in  older  hosts  contributed  to  the  ac- 
celerated and  intensified  injury  of  the  graft  is  difficult  to  determine,  because 
the  injury  by  the  connective  tissue  was  so  marked  that  it  might  have  obscured 
a  damaging  effect  of  the  bodyfluids.  We  have  already  remarked  that  in  old 
mice,  transplants  of  thyroid  and  cartilage  and  fat  tissue  could  do  as  well  as 
in  younger  animals. 


186  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

As  to  the  reason  why  transplantations  from  very  young  donors  may  succeed 
better  than  those  from  older  ones,  our  knowledge  is  still  less  definite.  How- 
ever, by  means  of  the  white  blood  cell  reaction  Blumenthal  could  show  that 
both  tissues  from  early  as  well  as  from  later  stages  of  rat  embryos  elicited  a 
lymphocytic  reaction  after  transplantation  into  adult  rats;  but  rat  or  mouse 
embryos  obtained  during  the  first  half  of  pregnancy  called  forth,  in  a 
heterogenous  host,  merely  an  increase  in  lymphocytes,  as  an  indication  that 
the  organismal  differentials  were  not  yet  fully  formed  at  this  period ;  a  short 
time  before  the  end  of  pregnancy  the  typical  heterogenous  reaction  did 
develop.  In  this  connection,  the  fact  must  be  recalled  that  also  implantation 
of  non-living  protein  substances,  may  call  forth  a  lymphocytic  reaction  and 
it  is  therefore  possible  that  a  non-specific  or  at  least  a  less  specific,  factor 
caused  the  effect  which  very  young  embryonic  tissue  exerted  on  the  lympho- 
cytes of  the  host.  It  may  then  be  concluded  from  these  experiments  that  the 
organismal  differentials  are  fully  developed  in  newborn  animals,  and  if  tissues 
from  very  young  donors  survive  better  in  homoiogenous  hosts  than  those 
from  older  ones,  this  must  be  due  to  other  factors  than  lack  of  differentials. 
In  this  regard  we  have  to  consider,  in  the  first  place,  the  greater  growth 
momentum  of  the  younger  tissues,  and  perhaps  also  their  greater  adaptability 
to  inadequate  environmental  conditions.  The  increased  growth  momentum 
may  be  able  to  overcome  injurious  conditions,  which  more  slowly  growing, 
adult  tissues  cannot  overcome  so  readily.  This  view  would  be  in  harmony  with 
the  experience  that  transplanted  rapidly  growing  tumors  which  possess  a 
strong  growth  momentum  may  be  more  resistant  to  the  action  of  unfavorable 
individuality  differentials  than  normal  tissues,  and,  similarly,  embryonic 
tissue  may  be  more  independent  of  the  action  of  such  differentials. 

There  is  still  a  further  point  to  be  considered.  Certain  organs  from  old 
animals  show  changes  which  make  them  less  suited  for  transplantation  than 
the  corresponding  organs  from  younger  ones;  thus  the  ovaries  of  older  mice 
and  of  other  species  contain  few  follicles,  and  the  thyroid  gland  in  certain 
strains  of  mice  undergoes  sclerosis ;  these  are  conditions  not  favorable  to  a 
good  development  and  function  of  the  essential  constituents  of  the  organs 
when  transplanted. 

We  have  attempted  in  this  analysis  to  separate  the  various  factors  which 
may  cause  the  difference  in  the  results  in  carrying  out  transplantation  experi- 
ments, using  young  and  old  animals  as  hosts  and  donors,  and  we  have  found 
that  the  individuality  differentials  are  fully  developed  in  young  donors  and 
that  a  lack  of  the  differentials  is  not  one  of  the  factors  that  causes  the 
difference  in  the  results  of  homoiotransplantation  in  animals  of  different 
ages.  The  greater  tendency  to  the  formation  of  fibrous  tissue  in  older, 
homoiogenous  hosts  and  the  greater  growth  energy  of  younger  tissues  may 
explain  at  least  some  of  these  differences. 


Chapter  20 
Individuality  Differentials  and  Tissue  Culture 

In  the  living  organism,  tissues  bearing  strange  individuality  differ- 
entials are  injured  by  the  homoio-  or  heterotoxins  circulating  in  the 
bodyfluids  of  the  host,  as  well  as  by  the  cells  of  the  host.  The  relative 
importance  of  these  two  injurious  factors  differs  in  different  species  and 
with  different  tissues.  In  higher  organisms,  the  reactions  against  tissues 
bearing  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials  are,  as  a  rule,  severe; 
however,  if  tissues  are  grown  in  tissue  culture,  no  special  difference  in  the 
effect  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  serum  or  plasma  serving  as  media 
is  noticeable.  This  follows  from  the  observations  of  I.  T.  Genther  and  the 
writer,  which  showed  that  the  number  of  mitoses  in  the  guinea  pig  thyroid 
was  about  the  same  in  vitro  in  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  serum,  when 
it  might  be  expected  that  quantitative  differences  in  mitotic  activity  would 
serve  as  a  delicate  indicator  of  the  injurious  influence  of  homoiotoxins.  Like- 
wise, the  differences  between  the  effects  of  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous 
plasma  or  serum  on  tissue  growing  in  vitro  are  much  less  than  are  the 
corresponding  differences  between  the  effects  of  homoiogenous  and  heterog- 
enous hosts  on  tissues  transplanted  into  living  animals.  Thus  Lambert  and 
Hanes  noted  that  rat  sarcoma  cells  may  grow  in  guinea  pig  plasma  for  30 
days,  in  rabbit  plasma  for  about  12  days,  in  dog  plasma  for  2-3  days,  and  in 
pigeon  plasma  for  4-5  days,  but  no  growth  of  rat  or  mouse  tumor  cells  took 
place  in  goat  plasma.  Also,  motile  cells  of  the  spleen  could  grow  out  in 
heterogenous  plasma,  and  both  rat  sarcoma  and  rat  spleen  produced  giant 
cells  in  such  a  medium ;  a  culture  of  fibroblasts  remained  active,  for  a  certain 
time  at  least,  in  a  heterogenous  medium,  but  the  injurious  effect  of  hetero- 
toxins became  manifest  more  readily  in  normal  fibroblasts  than  in  certain 
tumor  cells  (A.  Fischer).  There  may  be  active  in  these  cases,  both  the 
strange  organismal  differentials,  whose  effect  is  graded  in  accordance  with 
phylogenetic  relationship,  and  special  toxic  substances,  whose  action  does 
not  correspond  directly  to  this  relationship. 

The  same  two  factors  play  a  role  also  in  amphibian  tissues  growing  in 
vitro.  Thus,  Rhoda  Erdmann  cultivated  skin  of  Bufo  first  in  Bufo  plasma 
and  Bufo  spleen  extract,  next  in  Bufo  plasma  and  frog  spleen  extract,  and 
in  the  end  in  frog  plasma  and  frog  spleen  extract;  by  these  means  a  gradual 
adaptation  of  tissues  to  strange  organismal  differentials  was  achieved.  The 
skin  of  another  amphibian  species  could  likewise  be  cultivated  in  combina- 
tions of  heterogenous  plasma  and  tissue  extracts.  Hitchcock  found  that  frog 
skin  of  a  certain  species  grew  equally  well  in  autogenous  and  in  homoiogenous 
plasma  or  serum,  and  also  in  the  bodyfluids  of  heterogenous  species  of 
Rana.  However,  frog  skin  was  rapidly  killed  in  vitro  by  Necturus  plasma 

187 


188  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  Necturus  skin  was  similarly  affected  by  frog  plasma.  But  skin  of 
Necturus,  as  well  as  of  Triturus,  grew  well  in  plasma  and  serum  of  Necturus. 
It  may  then  be  concluded  that  the  differences  in  the  reactions  against  other 
than  autogenous  tissues  are  much  less  when  the  tissues  are  grown  in  homoi- 
ogenous or  heterogenous  serum  or  plasma,  than  when  they  are  placed  in 
homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  living  hosts.  However,  it  must  not  be  con- 
cluded from  these  and  other  similar  experiments  that  no  differences  exist, 
as  far  as  tissues  growing  in  vitro  are  concerned,  between  the  effect  of 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  media;  results  obtained  by  Hitchcock  al- 
ready suggest  that  such  differences  do  exist.  Likewise,  experiments  with 
mammalian  tissues  indicate  that  homoiogenous  plasmas  and  sera  are  pre- 
ferable to  heterogenous  ones,  although  the  admixture  of  heterogenous  tissue 
extracts  to  such  media  seems  not  to  interfere  seriously  with  the  life  and 
growth  of  tissues  under  these  conditions.  Thus  it  has  been  possible  for  fibro- 
blasts from  the  subcutaneous  tissue  of  the  adult  mouse  to  grow  actively  for 
many  successive  generations  in  a  culture  medium  of  chickenplasma,  chick 
embryo  extract  and  horseserum  without  serious  interference  with  the  pro- 
liferation, motility  and  structural  potentialities  of  these  cells. 

There  exist  various  differences  between  tissues  living  in  their  normal 
environment,  tissues  transplanted  into  other  living  organisms,  and  tissues 
cultivated  in  vitro.  In  tissue  culture,  the  aggressive  action  of  host  cells  which 
attack  the  grafts  is  eliminated;  in  vitro  the  tissues  are  exposed  merely  to 
the  action  of  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  organismal  differentials,  con- 
tained in  the  bodyfluids,  and  the  toxic  effect  produced  on  them  by  the  latter 
is  less  than  when  they  are  transplanted  into  living  hosts. 

As  to  the  conditions  which  render  these  bodyfluids  less  injurious  in  tissue 
culture:  (1)  One  factor  is  probably  the  small  amount  of  blood  plasma  or 
serum  present  in  the  culture  media,  which  contains  the  toxins,  as  compared 
to  the  continuous  current  of  fluid  carrying  fresh  supplies  of  homoio-  and 
heterotoxins  to  the  transplant  in  the  living  body.  Such  a  condition  may  be 
active  also  when  the  homoiogenous  plasma  of  an  animal  which  had  proved 
to  be  immune  to  the  growth  of  a  certain  tumor,  is  used  as  a  culture  medium 
for  a  piece  from  the  same  tumor  growing  in  vitro;  it  does  not  prevent  the 
growth  of  the  tumor;  under  these  circumstances,  the  amount  of  homoio- 
toxins  present  at  a  certain  time  is  presumably  insufficient.  (2)  A  second  factor 
concerns  the  growth  momentum  of  cells  in  vitro.  Cells  growing  in  vitro  are  not 
components  of  an  ordinary,  relatively  resting  tissue;  they  are  very  actively 
growing  and  are  either  of  embryonal  origin  or  are  derived  from  adult  cells, 
or,  they  may  be  cancer  cells.  Both  embryonal  cells  and  cancer  cells  are  under 
the  influence  of  factors  which  stimulate  them  to  grow  continuously,  while 
cells  derived  from  adult  cells,  being  separated  from  their  normal  environ- 
ment, are  continuously  regenerating.  In  all  these  types  of  cells  the  growth 
momentum  is  increased,  and  furthermore,  it  is  possible  that  in  the  case  of 
the  embryonal  cells  the  individuality  differentials  may  not  yet  be  completely 
developed.  Such  an  increase  in  growth  momentum  makes  it  possible  for 
these  cells  to  overcome  difficulties  to  which  other  cells  might  succumb;  in 


TISSUE  CULTURE  189 

addition,  they  may  lack  certain  products  of  differentiation  which  might  serve 
as  an  effective  point  of  attack  for  injurious  substances  present  in  the 
circulating  blood ;  this  is  suggested  by  the  fact  that  in  actively  growing  cells, 
whether  they  are  embryonal,  regenerating  adult,  or  tumor  cells,  there  is  less 
tendency  to  differentiation  and  a  full  development  of  the  tissue  or  organ 
differentials  is  lacking — a  condition  noted  apparently  also  in  plant  cells 
growing  in  vitro,  as  the  experiments  of  White  indicate.  On  the  other  hand, 
if  factors  capable  of  inflicting  a  limited  degree  of  injury,  act  on  these  stimu- 
lated, actively-growing  cells,  either  normal  or  abnormal  processes  of  dif- 
ferentiation may  occur,  which,  as  an  endstage,  may  lead  to  cell  death.  It 
seems  that  with  this  diminution  in  the  development  of  tissue  differentials  and 
in  tissue  differentiation,  as  well  as  with  the  increase  in  growth  momentum, 
there  is  perhaps  associated  also  a  diminution  in  the  sensitiveness  to  not  quite 
adequate  individuality  differentials.  These  factors,  taken  together,  might  then 
explain  why  tissues  growing  in  tissue  cultures  are  less  affected  by  not  quite 
harmonious  individuality  differentials  than  normal  adult,  relatively  resting, 
differentiated  tissues. 


Chapter  21 

The  Individuality  Differentials  and  Potential 
Immortality  of  Tissues 

In  the  preceding  chapter  we  have  analyzed  the  significance  of  individual- 
ity differentials  in  the  life  of  tissues  growing  in  vitro  and  have  tried 
to  explain  the  relative  independence  of  the  cells  living  under  these  con- 
ditions from  the  nature  of  the  individuality  differentials  and  the  diminution 
in  the  significance  of  the  species  differentials  of  the  surrounding  media.  The 
same  factors  which  are  active  under  these  conditions  enable  the  cells  to  live 
and  propagate  indefinitely,  provided  definite  experimental  requirements  are 
fulfilled.  It  could  be  shown  that  some  cells  and  tissues  of  mammalian 
organisms  are  potentially  immortal.  This  holds  good,  with  the  reservation 
that  the  term  "immortality"  is  applied  here  in  a  relative,  not  in  an  absolute 
sense,  the  immortality  being  limited  by  the  need  of  the  existence  of  certain  en- 
vironmental factors,  which  in  all  probability  will  come  to  an  end  in  some  dis- 
tant future. 

However,  the  potential  immortality  of  various  mammalian  tissues  was  first 
recognized  in  the  case  of  tumors.  In  1901,  we  showed  that  it  is  possible  to 
transplant  tumors  through  many  consecutive  generations  of  animals  of  the 
species  or  strain  in  which  the  tumor  originated.  There  seemed  to  be  no 
limit  to  the  continuous  life  inherent  in  the  propagated  cells,  inasmuch  as  the 
termination  of  these  long  continued  serial  transplantations  depended  solely 
upon  accidental,  unfavorable  factors  which  could  be  avoided.  Furthermore, 
since  it  was  evident  that  tumor  cells  are  merely  ordinary  tissue  cells  which 
could  be  transformed  into  tumor  cells  at  will  under  well-defined  experi- 
mental conditions,  the  conclusion  was  justified  that  also  the  normal  cells 
from  which  the  tumor  cells  were  derived,  have  the  potentiality  to  immortal 
life. 

Subsequently,  a  second  method,  already  mentioned,  was  used  by  Carrel 
and  Ebeling,  who  transferred  embryonic  connective  tissue  cells  serially  from 
generation  to  generation  in  tissue  culture.  Here  the  embryonic  cells  are 
stimulated  to  multiply  indefinitely  by  the  conditions  which  have  been  pre- 
pared for  them  experimentally;  when  transferred  serially  to  fresh  culture 
media,  they  may  be  kept  alive  indefinitely.  But  while  it  is  mainly  embryonic 
fibroblasts  which  have  been  propagated  in  this  way  from  generation  to 
generation,  there  are  a  considerable  number  of  types  of  normal  cells  which, 
after  transformation  into  tumor  cells,  have  acquired  the  ability  to  propagate 
indefinitely.  This  is  true  not  only  of  different  types  of  connective  tissue  cells, 
but  of  mammary  gland  tissue  and  various  other  epithelial  cells;  also  of 
endothelial  and  cartilage  cells ;  indeed,  it  is  in  principle  true  probably  of  all 
cells  which  constitute  transplanted  malignant  as  well  as  some  benign  tumors. 

190 


POTENTIAL  IMMORTALITY  OF  TISSUES  191 

While,  therefore,  on  theoretical  grounds  it  is  justifiable  to  extend  the 
conclusion  as  to  the  potential  immortality  of  cells  to  ordinary  tissue  cells, 
actually  it  has  not  been  possible  to  demonstrate  this  characteristic  by  the  same 
method  in  normal  tissues  as  in  tumors,  on  account  of  the  more  severe  injurious 
effects  produced  by  strange  individuality  differentials  on  normal  tissues, 
as  compared  to  tumors,  after  their  transplantation  into  new  hosts.  Our 
attempts  to  transplant  epidermis  serially  succeeded  for  only  a  relatively  short 
period.  Normal  cartilage  seemed  to  be  a  much  more  favorable  tissue  for  long- 
continued  transplantation,  inasmuch  as  it  is  more  resistant  to  injurious  condi- 
tions than  are  most  tissues,  and  better  able  to  withstand  the  unfavorable 
effects  of  the  homoiotoxins  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  and  of  the  aggressive 
host  cells,  especially  the  connective  tissue  cells  and  lymphocytes.  In  addition, 
there  is  some  reason  for  believing  that  transplanted  cartilage  gives  off  a 
smaller  amount  of  homoiogenous  substance  than  do  other  more  actively 
metabolizing  tissues.  It  was  thus  possible  to  transplant  cartilage  serially  for 
several  years,  and  not  only  into  young  rats  but  also  into  very  old  animals 
which  were  approaching  the  end  of  their  life.  In  these  experiments  it  was 
the  xiphoid  cartilage  of  rats  which  was  transplanted  into  dorsal  subcutaneous 
pockets  of  other  rats.  The  length  of  time  elapsing  between  consecutive 
transplantations  of  a  piece  of  cartilage, to  a  series  of  hosts  varied  between 
one  month  and  one  year.  On  the  average,  a  new  transplantation  was  carried 
out  every  five  to  six  months.  It  was  thus  possible  to  keep  the  transplant 
alive  for  several  years,  since  at  the  time  of  the  first  transplantation  the 
cartilage  had  already  reached  an  age  varying  between  two  and  three  years 
and  it  could  be  transplanted  serially  for  more  than  three  years ;  at  the  end 
of  the  experiment  the  cartilage  had  reached  an  age  of  five  to  six  years,  a 
period  considerably  exceeding  the  average  length  of  life  of  the  rat,  which  is 
usually  not  more  than  three  years. 

This  relative  success  in  the  serial  transplantation  of  cartilage  is  due  to  the 
factors  mentioned  above.  The  lymphocytes  of  the  host  accumulate  around 
the  transplant  in  smaller  numbers,  and,  as  stated  previously,  the  lympho- 
cytic reaction  may  even  decrease  in  the  course  of  time.  The  lymphocytes 
were  found  in  the  largest  number  in  the  fourth  week,  and  from  then  on 
their  number  gradually  decreased,  until  after  five  months  the  transplant 
showed  usually  only  a  very  weak  or  no  lymphocytic  reaction;  but  20  days 
after  re-transplantation  the  lymphocytic  reaction  could  again  become  distinct. 
In  the  course  of  these  transplantations  the  perichondrium  may  regenerate 
and  form  new  cartilage  around  a  piece  of  this  tissue,  that  had  become 
necrotic  as  a  result  of  transplantation.  Groups  of  very  young  perichondrial 
cartilage  cells  may  be  found  at  the  time  of  examination,  but  the  new 
cartilage  does  not  penetrate  into  the  surrounding  tissue.  The  perichondrium 
produces  cartilage  towards  the  inside,  ensheathing  or  replacing  the  old 
cartilage,  but  towards  the  outside  it  seems  to  produce  a  tissue  that  is  transi- 
tional between  cartilage  and  fibrous  tissue,  and  that  resembles  at  the  outer- 
most border  typical  fibrous  tissue.  However,  if  the  transplanted  cartilage 
becomes  thick  as  the  result  of  the  growth  activity  of  the  perichondrium — 


192  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  this  is  true  even  if  normal,  not  transplanted  cartilage  has  reached  a 
certain  thickness— the  central  parts  may  shrink  and  become  necrotic,  due 
to  their  distance  from  the  blood  vessels  which  carry  nourishment  to  the 
perichondrium  and  to  the  outer  layers  of  the  cartilage.  It  is  probably  also  the 
deficiency  in  oxygen  and  other  food  material  that  causes  the  small,  relatively 
undifferentiated  perichondrial  cells  to  change  into  the  large  and  fully  dif- 
ferentiated cartilage  cells.  Only  in  one  case  had  a  piece  of  cartilage,  after  a 
period  of  serial  transplantations  extending  over  two  years  and  ten  months, 
produced  bone;  bone  plates  were  lying  along  the  cartilage  and  in  the  bone 
there  was  a  development  of  marrow  containing  fat  cells. 

It  is  the  connective  tissue  which  is  active  in  the  destruction  of  serially 
transplanted  cartilage.  This  forms  a  capsule  around  the  transplant  and  it 
invades,  dissolves  and  gradually  replaces  the  necrotic  parts ;  occasionally, 
blood  capillaries  and  some  lymphocytes  may  penetrate  with  the  connective 
tissue  into  the  areas  of  necrosis.  But  under  certain  conditions  the  connective 
tissue  may  push  its  way  also  into  that  part  of  the  living  cartilage  where 
the  cells  are  separated  by  a  relatively  large  amount  of  hyaline  intercellular 
substance  or  by  a  very  thick  capsule.  On  the  other  hand,  the  connective 
tissue  is  apparently  unable  to  penetrate  into  living  perichondrium  or  into 
young  perichondrial  cartilage,  where  the  cells  are  placed  close  to  one  another. 
It  is  therefore  the  fargoing  differentiation,  the  marked  formation  of  inter- 
cellular substance  or  of  capsule  meterial,  which  gives  the  connective  tissue 
an  opportunity  to  exert  its  invasive,  constrictive,  and  therefore  injurious 
action.  Healthy  young  cartilage  cells  are  safe  from  the  attack  by  the  host 
connective  tissue,  although,  as  we  have  seen  previously,  they  are  exposed  to 
the  invasion  by  lymphocytes.  Thus  a  vicious  circle  is  established:  certain 
unfavorable  conditions,  such  as  deficient  nourishment,  lead  to  the  production 
of  the  differentiated  cellular  and  intercellular  paraplastic  substances,  and 
then  the  resulting  ingrowth  of  connective  tissue  tends  to  divide  the  trans- 
plant into  small  partitions  and  otherwise  injure  it,  decreasing  still  further 
its  normal  oxygen  and  food  supply  and  preventing  its  normal  proliferation. 
To  ensure  the  survival  of  the  cartilage  transplant,  it  is  necessary  to  keep  the 
perichondrium  surrounding  it  alive.  The  tissue  equilibrium  is  best  main- 
tained if  the  resting  connective  tissue  of  the  host  surrounds  the  perichondrium 
of  the  transplanted  resting  cartilage.  But  at  the  same  time  it  is  necessary  to 
prevent  the  impairment  of  the  nourishment  of  the  transplant  by  the  con- 
nective tissue  capsule.  If  there  is  a  deficiency  in  the  nourishment  of  the 
transplant,  a  necrosis  in  its  center  occurs,  the  tissue  equilibrium  is  disturbed, 
and  in  consequence  the  new  formation  of  the  perichondrial  cartilage  cells 
takes  place,  which  subsequently  differentiate  and  produce  intercellular  sub- 
stance. Thus  both  (1)  primary  injurious  conditions  which  affect  directly 
the  transplant,  and  (2)  the  activity  of  the  host  connective  tissue  and  lympho- 
cytes, taking  place  under  the  influence  of  homoiogenous  individuality  dif- 
ferentials, may  play  a  part  in  shortening  the  life  of  the  transplant.  In  old 
age,  changes  similar  to  those  seen  after  homoiogenous  transplantation  occur 
in  organs,  namely,  a  decrease  in  the  parenchyma  and  an  increase  in  the 


POTENTIAL  IMMORTALITY  OF  TISSUES  193 

fibrous  stroma.  The  primary  degenerative  changes  in  the  parenchyma  may 
stimulate  the  connective  tissue  or  glia  to  increased  activity.  These  changes  in 
the  stroma  impair  still  more  the  preservation  and  functioning  of  the 
parenchyma,  which  then  may  undergo  further  degeneration. 

However,  if  we  select  very  closely  inbred  strains  of  mice,  where  all  the 
individuality  differentials  approach  the  character  of  autogenous  differentials — 
although  this  state  has  not  yet  been  completely  attained — the  prospects  of  a 
successful  serial  transplantation  even  of  whole  organs  such  as  thyroid  gland 
are  greatly  improved.  Moreover,  in  the  mouse  the  host  cells,  whose  function 
it  is  to  attack  the  tissues  possessing  strange  differentials,  are  often  less  active 
than  they  are  in  rat  and  guinea  pig.  Hence  it  has  been  possible  in  our  experi- 
ments to  prolong  the  life  of  serially  transplanted  organs  beyond  the  usual 
length  of  life  of  the  mouse,  and  there  are  indications  that  it  may  be  possible, 
by  carrying  out  serial  transplantations  in  closely  inbred  strains,  to  keep  alive 
and  growing  indefinitely  not  only  cells  which  are  more  or  less  independent  of 
each  other,  such  as  connective  tissue  cells,  but  also  whole  organs. 

The  potential  immortality  of  mammalian  cells  has  then  so  far  been  demon- 
strated by  two  methods,  in  both  of  which  the  cells  are  subjected  to  unceasing, 
intensified  growth  stimulation — namely  (1)  the  serial  transplantation  of 
tumors  and  (2)  the  continued  transfer  of  cells  in  tissue  culture.  In  the  first 
method  specific  tumor  stimuli,  and  in  the  latter  stimuli  characteristic  of 
regenerative  and  embryonal  growth  are  active.  The  constant  renewal  of  the 
cells  by  mitosis,  under  the  influence  of  these  stimuli,  prevents  undue  dif- 
ferentiation and  production  of  paraplastic  substances,  which  would  injure  the 
cells  and  in  the  end  prematurely  destroy  them.  Cells  which  have  gained  in 
differentiation  beyond  a  certain  limit  and,  correspondingly,  lost  in  the  power 
of  propagation,  such  as  ganglia  cells  or  certain  leucocytes,  either  slowly 
undergo  gradual  atrophy  or  degenerative  processes  or  they  die  at  an  early  pe- 
riod. Cells  which,  as  a  result  of  processes  of  differentiation,  have  lost,  not  yet 
entirely  but  to  a  certain  degree,  their  power  of  propagation,  undergo  abnormal 
changes  of  further  differentiation  when  acted  upon  by  growth  stimuli  origi- 
nating from  the  outside  or  within  the  cells  themselves.  The  same  process 
may  therefore  function  both  as  growth  stimulator  and,  in  a  certain  sense,  also 
as  differentiator  of  cells,  if  it  acts  on  a  cellular  substratum  in  which  an  in- 
termediate degree  of  differentiation  has  taken  place.  Eut,  as  stated,  if  the 
differentiation  has  reached  a  further  advanced  stage,  growth  stimuli  may 
induce  alterations  in  the  cell  equilibrium  so  great  that  they  lead  to  cell  death, 
which  thus  represents  the  endstage  of  the  differentiating  process. 

While  both  methods,  which  have  been  used  so  far  for  the  demonstration 
of  the  potential  immortality  of  tissues  of  higher  organisms,  require  the 
constant  action  of  growth-promoting  factors,  there  remains  the  possibility 
that  certain  organs,  such  as  the  thyroid  gland,  in  which  the  units  composing 
the  organ  are  closed  cell  complexes,  forming  acini  or  similar  structures, 
may  through  well-timed  serial  transplantation  be  kept  alive  indefinitely, 
without  a  very  active  cell  proliferation  taking  place.  This  can,  however,  be 
accomplished  only  if  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  host  and  transplant 


194  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

are  very  similar.  Homoiogenous  and  heterogeneous  individuality  differentials 
represent  one  of  the  most  important  injurious  factors  opposing  the  perpetual 
life  of  tissues  if  separated  from  their  normal  connections.  However,  even 
within  the  animal's  own  body,  where  the  individuality  differentials  are  autog- 
enous, the  return  to  the  original  tissue  equilibrium  after  a  disequilibration 
has  been  established  may  be  incomplete,  owing  to  the  fact  that  the  various 
tissues  live  under  environmental  conditions  to  which  they  are  not  fully 
adapted  and  which,  under  some  circumstances  may  become  injurious.  These 
factors,  step  by  step,  cause  the  old  age  changes  and,  finally  the  death 
of  the  tissues  and  of  the  individual  in  which,  for  a  time,  they  have  func- 
tioned. The  cells  have  to  live  under  such  injurious  conditions  because  they 
exert  functions  which  concern  the  organism  as  a  whole,  and  they  are 
acted  upon  by  cells  and  substances  which  likewise  function  in  the  interest 
of  the  whole  organism;  it  is  this  condition  which  causes  their  ultimate 
destruction.  Hence  potential  immortality  does  not  apply  to  the  higher  organ- 
ism as  a  whole,  but  only  to  certain  types  of  cells  or  organs  which  constitute 
parts  of  this  organism.  The  individual  as  such,  as  far  as  is  known  at  present, 
cannot  avoid  death. 


Chapter  22 

The  Nature  of  the  Individuality  Differentials  and 

of  the  Reaction  of  an  Organism  Against  a 

Strange  Individuality  Differential 

We  have  discussed  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  various 
types  of  individuality  differentials  in  various  species  of  animals, 
but  in  every  case  we  have  dealt  with  reactions  against  tissues  con- 
taining an  individuality  differential  mixed  with  other  substances,  and  not 
with  the  reaction  of  cells  and  tissues  against  an  individuality  differential 
isolated  in  a  pure  state.  No  direct  attempt  has  been  made  so  far  to  determine 
the  chemical  structure  of  this  substance.  However,  by  subjecting  the  tissues 
to  various  procedures,  it  has  been  possible  to  draw  certain  general  conclusions 
as  to  the  chemical  constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials.  We  have  used 
for  this  purpose  (1)  the  effect  of  graded  exposure  of  tissues  to  higher 
temperatures,  and  (2)  the  effect  of  different  chemical  substances  on  the 
individuality  differentials  present  in  various  tissues.  Tissues  thus  treated 
were  then  tested  by  means  of  transplantation  into  different  types  of  hosts 
in  the  same  way  as  normal  tissues. 

(1)  The  effect  of  heat  on  the  organismal  differentials  in  (a)  homoiogenous 
and  (b)  heterogenous  tissues.  In  experiments  by  Siebert,  to  which  we  have 
referred  already,  it  was  shown  that  by  in  vitro  exposure  of  thyroid  and 
cartilage  of  the  guinea  pig  to  temperatures  varying  between  43  and  51  °C 
for  half  an  hour  and  then  by  transplantation  of  these  pieces  into  homoiogenous 
animals,  it  is  possible  to  diminish  very  much  the  lymphocytic  reaction 
of  the  host  against  the  transplants.  These  results  indicate  that  the  heating 
at  very  moderate  temperatures  reduced  markedly  the  quantity  of  homoiogenous 
individuality  differentials  which  diffused  from  the  graft  into  the  surrounding 
host  tissue.  It  is  not  certain  whether  in  this  case  a  definite  injury  of  the 
individuality  differentials  had  taken  place  in  the  transplanted  tissues,  or 
whether  merely  the  diffusion  of  these  differential  substances  into  the  sur- 
rounding tissue  had  been  made  more  difficult. 

It  is  more  probable  that  the  first  explanation  is  the  correct  one,  because  a 
short  delay  in  diffusion  should  not  have  affected  so  much  the  strength  of 
the  lymphocytic  reaction,  but  should  only  have  delayed  its  appearance  for  a 
short  time.  The  heating  of  the  tissues  at  the  same  temperature  affected  the 
reactions  of  a  heterogenous  host  much  less  than  those  of  a  homoiogenous 
host;  in  the  former  there  was  only  a  slight  diminution  in  the  number  of 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  and  lymphocytes.  This  effect  must  have  been 
due  to  a  not  very  marked  injury  inflicted  on  the  heterogenous  differentials 

195 


196  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

through  the  heating.  Blumenthal  subsequently  tested  the  effect  of  heating  of 
both  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues  on  the  organismal  differentials 
by  means  of  white  blood  cell  counts.  In  these  experiments,  also,  the  tissues 
were  exposed  to  heat  for  30  minutes  in  a  test  tube  previous  to  transplanta- 
tion. A  temperature  of  from  45°  to  50°C  hardly  affected  the  individuality 
differential  of  guinea  pig  or  rat  thyroid,  nor  was  the  individuality  differen- 
tial of  pigeon  skin,  which  normally  shows  a  weak  reaction,  much  affected 
thereby.  The  same  negative  result  was  obtained  when  rat  skin  was  heated  at 
52°C,  but  the  individuality  differential  of  pigeon  thyroid,  heated  at  54°C, 
was  weakened  or  destroyed  in  one-half  of  the  experiments.  This  temperature 
seems  to  represent  the  critical  point ;  but  if  the  temperature  reached  56°C, 
the  individuality  differential  of  thyroid  in  various  species  was  destroyed, 
but  that  of  the  guinea  pig  kidney  was  merely  weakened;  presumably  the 
denser  texture  of  the  kidney  affords  a  better  protection  against  the  effect  of 
the  heat. 

To  test  the  heterogenous  organismal  differentials  (species  differentials), 
tissues  were  exchanged  between  rat  and  guinea  pig.  Heating  at  56° C  de- 
stroyed the  heterogenous  differentials  of  thyroid  tissue  of  rat  and  guinea  pig, 
but  left  those  of  cartilage  and  kidney  unaffected.  In  kidney  tissue,  heating  at 
60°C  destroyed  the  differentials  in  seven  out  of  eight  experiments,  and  in 
cartilage  this  temperature  injured  or  destroyed  the  differentials  in  one-half 
of  the  cases,  but  heating  at  65°C  destroyed  also  the  species  differential  in 
cartilage.  In  the  experiments  of  Siebert,  as  well  as  in  those  of  Blumenthal, 
the  heterogenous  differentials  were  somewhat  more  resistant  to  heat  than 
the  homoiogenous  differentials.  However,  the  temperatures  needed  for  the 
injury  of  both  types  of  differentials  were  somewhat  lower  in  the  experi- 
ments of  Siebert,  who  used  the  local  reactions  as  a  test,  than  in  those  of 
Blumenthal,  who  made  use  of  the  blood-cell  reaction.  Furthermore,  in  the 
latter  series  the  tissues  possessing  a  denser  texture  were  more  resistant  to 
the  destructive  effects  of  heat  than  those  possessing  a  looser  structure.  While 
the  differentials  in  thyroid  were  more  sensitive  than  those  in  kidney,  the  latter 
were  more  sensitive  than  those  in  cartilage.  This  again  corresponds  to  the 
gradation  of  sensitiveness  of  the  various  tissues  to  the  action  of  strange 
differentials.  The  injury  of  the  tissues  takes  a  course  parallel  to  that  of  the 
organismal  differentials,  which  they  contain.  In  general,  we  may  conclude 
that  the  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  differentials  possess  marked  sen- 
sitiveness to  the  injurious  effects  of  heat,  corresponding  approximately  to  the 
heat  sensitiveness  of  the  organs  of  which  they  form  a  part  and  this  sensitive- 
ness may  be  attributed  to  the  labile  proteins  which  are  the  most  characteristic 
constituent  of  living  tissues.  It  seems  probable  therefore  that  the  differentials 
themselves  are  proteins,  or  combinations  of  proteins  with  certain  chemical 
groups  of  a  different  kind. 

This  conclusion  is  supported  by  experiments  in  which  Blumenthal  ex- 
posed tissues  to  the  action  of  various  chemicals  and  then  tested  their  effect  on 
homoiogenous  differentials  by  the  alterations  induced  by  these  differentials  in 
the  white  blood  counts  of  the  host.  Least  injurious  for  the  individuality  differ- 


NATURE  OF  THE  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS     197 

entials  was  glycerine  or  a  0.9%  solution  of  sodium  chloride,  saturated  with 
thymol.  In  the  latter,  the  individuality  differentials  were  active  in  the  majority 
of  cases  after  immersion  for  24  hours,  and  in  the  former,  after  immersion  for 
12  hours.  In  acetone  and  in  half  molar  sodium  benzoate,  the  transplants  in 
most  cases  were  inactive  after  immersion  for  one  hour,  but  some  remained 
active;  after  12  or  24  hours  immersion,  they  all  had  become  inactive.  In  95% 
alcohol,  37%  formaldehyde,  and  one-half  saturated  solution  of  ammonium 
sulfate,  all  the  pieces  were  inactive  after  immersion  for  one  hour.  Treated 
with  50%  urea,  less  than  one-half  of  the  pieces  were  active  after  immersion 
for  one  hour;  with  one-half  molar  ferrous  chloride  and  with  1/200  molar 
ferrous  chloride  for  six  hours,  all  the  pieces  had  become  inactive. 

The  substances  used  in  these  experiments  may  act  in  either  of  two  ways : 
(1)  some  may  extract  the  homoiogenous  differentials,  and  (2)  others,  espe- 
cially those  which  affect  the  proteins,  probably  injure  or  destroy  the  homoiog- 
enous differentials.  Among  the  latter,  most  effective  are  those  substances 
which  actively  denature  protein.  In  general,  the  homoiogenous  differentials 
proved  to  be  very  sensitive  to  chemical  substances  of  various  kinds  and  par- 
ticularly to  substances  which  alter  proteins.  There  is  reason  for  assuming  that 
these  differentials  are  produced  only  in  living  tissues,  inasmuch  as  the  ma- 
jority of  the  pieces  of  tissues  which  had  become  ineffective,  after  having  been 
subjected  to  the  action  of  such  a  chemical,  had  been  killed  or  severely  injured. 
If,  under  these  conditions,  merely  a  newformation  of  the  individuality 
differentials  had  been  prevented,  it  should  have  been  possible  at  least  for  the 
differentials  preformed  in  the  tissues  to  be  potent.  However,  as  stated,  it 
seems  that  the  majority  of  the  chemicals  used  injured  also  these  individuality 
differential  substances  as  such. 

It  is  of  interest  to  compare  with  these  reactions,  those  in  which  Blumen- 
thal  introduced  various  proteins,  carbohydrates,  fats,  or  lipoids  subcutaneous- 
ly.  Substances  which  were  liquid  were  injected  subcutaneously  on  successive 
days.  The  proteins  caused  a  reaction  in  the  peripheral  blood,  similar  to  that 
induced  by  homoiogenous  differentials.  But  it  differed  from  the  latter  reaction 
in  that  the  response  of  blood  cells  was  not  destroyed  by  a  preliminary  ex- 
posure of  these  protein  substances  to  heat.  Heterogenous  rabbit  serum  and 
heterogenous  embryonic  tissue  behaved  like  these  protein  substances ;  they 
elicited  merely  an  increase  of  lymphocytes  in  the  blood,  which  appeared 
between  the  second  and  fourth  day  after  implantation  of  the  foreign  protein. 
None  of  the  non-protein  substances  gave  rise  to  this  reaction. 

From  these  experiments,  it  follows  that  as  far  as  the  effects  of  strange  sub- 
stances on  the  white  blood  cells  circulating  in  the  blood  vessels  indicate  there 
is  a  definite  order  in  which  these  substances  can  be  arranged.  (1)  The  finest 
gradations  in  the  reactions  are  found  if  substances  possessing  strange  indi- 
viduality or  species  differentials  are  introduced.  The  reactions  here  correspond 
to  the  genetic  reationship  between  host  and  donor.  (2)  Next  come  substances 
of  a  protein  nature,  which  cause  reactions  not  unlike  those  produced  by 
homoiogenous  differentials  ;  the  former  elicit  more  marked  reactions  than  those 
brought  about  by  autogenous  individuality  differentials,  which  themselves 


198  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

induce  no  changes,  the  changes  noted  being  due  merely  to  the  operation  on  the 
animal.  But  these  protein  substances  continue  to  exert  their  effects  after  they 
have  been  subjected  to  treatments  which  deprive  homoiogenous  differentials  of 
their  characteristic  influence.  (3)  Likewise,  protein  substances,  such  as  those 
present  in  blood  serum  of  strange  species,  exert  a  homoiogenous  effect;  (4) 
on  the  other  hand,  blood  plasma  of  a  different  species  exhibits  the  effects  of 
true  heterogenous  differentials,  probably  because  of  the  presence  of  fibrinogen. 
(5)  Lastly,  there  are  strange  substances  of  a  non-protein  nature;  these  are  de- 
void of  any  specific  action  and  behave  like  autogenous  substances.  But  again, 
in  contrast  to  autogenous  substances,  non-protein  substances  are  non-specific. 

It  might  be  of  interest  also  to  compare  the  local  reaction  elicited  by  ordinary 
foreign  bodies  with  that  induced  by  substances  carrying  autogenous,  homoiog- 
enous or  heterogenous  organismal  differentials.  The  material  which  possesses 
individuality  or  species  differentials,  after  introduction  into  the  subcutaneous 
tissue,  exerts  a  combination  of  two  effects:  (1)  non-specific  foreign  body 
effects  and  (2)  specific  effects  elicited  by  the  individuality  and  species  differ- 
entials 

It  will  therefore  be  necessary  to  analyze  the  differences  between  the  reac- 
tions against  a  foreign  body  and  the  more  specific  reactions  against  living  tis- 
sue. The  reactions  of  the  host  cells  against  the  foreign  body  do  not  show  those 
fine  gradations  which  are  elicited  by  the  individuality  and  species  differentials. 
Variations  observed  in  the  reactions  against  foreign  bodies  depend  largely 
upon  mechanical  factors  which  distinguish  different  kinds  of  material,  but 
there  are  also  some  slight  differences  in  the  mode  of  reaction  shown  by  differ- 
ent host  species.  Common  to  all  these  foreign  body  reactions  is  the  prominent 
part  played  by  the  connective  tissue  cells  of  the  host;  they  move  towards  the 
strange  material  and  attempt  to  invade  and  to  make  it  into  a  part  of  the  host 
by  transforming  it  into  fibrous  tissue.  They  first  surround  the  periphery  and 
then  turning  at  a  right  angle  invade  it,  branching  off  in  tree-like  fashion ;  they 
act  as  though  they  were  stimulated  and  activated  by  the  foreign  material.  In 
contrast  to  the  farther  distant  connective  tissue,  which  tends  to  assume  a 
resting  condition,  forming  collagen  fibers,  the  connective  tissue  directly  ad- 
joining the  foreign  body  remains  cellular.  However,  the  soil  into  which  these 
host  cells  have  penetrated  is  injurious  to  them  and  after  a  certain  time  they 
are  apt  to  perish ;  their  fibroplasm  and  nuclei  become  admixed  to  the  foreign 
material,  such  as  1%  agar,  and  thus  a  new  substratum  consisting  of  a  com- 
bination of  disintegrating  cellular  material  and  the  fibroplasm-agar-mixture  is 
produced;  into  this  other  host  cells  penetrate  and  ultimately  accomplish  its 
organization.  In  the  peripherpy  of  the  foreign  body  and  also  in  its  fissures 
there  may  also  collect  giant  cells  of  various  sizes,  and  mononuclear  cells,  the 
nature  of  which  is  uncertain,  but  which  may  perhaps  represent  either  modified 
connective  tissue  cells  or  monocytes.  It  seems  that  giant  cells  with  their  ac- 
cumulation of  nuclei  and  their  increase  in  cytoplasm  form  especially  in 
those  places  in  which  there  is  an  obstacle  to  the  progress  of  the  host  cells,  as 
in  furrows  in  the  foreign  body.  All  those  cells,  the  giant  cells  as  well  as  the 
mononuclear  cells,  or  cells  transitional  between  these  two,  possessing  two 


NATURE  OF  THE  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS     199 

nuclei,  may  act  as  ameboid  cells  and  as  phagocytes ;  they  send  pseudopods  into 
the  foreign  material,  take  small  particles  of  it  into  their  cell-body  and  if 
possible  digest  them,  as  indicated  by  the  intracellular  vacuoles  to  which  they 
give  rise.  The  cytoplasm  of  the  giant  cells  may  become  quite  vacuolated  and 
in  the  end,  the  latter  perish.  Small  particles  of  the  foreign  body,  detached 
from  these  aggressive  cells,  may  be  found  also  between  the  connective  tissue 
fibers  surrounding  the  agar  or  filling  the  fissure  in  the  agar  which  they  had 
produced.  In  certain  cases,  but  not  very  frequently,  also  lymphocytes  accumu- 
late round  the  piece  or  in  its  fissures ;  they  were  found  more  often  in  rat  and 
guinea  pig  than  in  pigeon,  although  lymphocytes  occur  in  the  circulation  in 
larger  proportion  in  birds  than  in  rodents  and  although  they  were  more  numer- 
ous around  and  in  homoiogenous  tissues  in  the  pigeon  than  in  guinea  pig  or 
rat.  Their  presence  around  foreign  bodies  is  due  to  non-specific  irritations 
which  the  foreign  material  exerts  and  perhaps  to  some  as  yet  unknown  acci- 
dental factors.  Occasionally  also  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  penetrate, 
likewise  in  tree-like  fashion,  into  the  agar  and  dissolve  it  readily;  here  they 
perish  after  some  time  and  the  dissolved  material  is  ultimately  replaced  by 
ingrowing  connective  tissue.  It  is  not  certain  whether  invasion  by  these  leuco- 
cytes is  the  result  of  an  accidental  infection  by  bacteria  or  whether  it  is  due 
to  other  factors.  If  coagulated  egg-white  instead  of  agar  is  implanted  into  the 
subcutaneous  tissue,  the  reactions  of  the  host  cells  are,  in  principle,  the  same 
as  with  agar ;  but  on  account  of  the  greater  hardness  of  this  substance,  it  is 
much  more  difficult  for  the  cells  to  penetrate  it  and  the  reactions,  therefore, 
take  place  for  the  most  part  in  the  periphery  of  the  egg-white,  but,  to  some 
extent,  cells  do  invade  it.  Formation  of  fibrillar  connective  tissue  capsules 
around  the  pieces  seems  to  be  relatively  the  more  prominent  the  harder  the 
material. 

We  see,  then,  that  the  same  elements  participate  in  these  reactions  against 
foreign  bodies  as  against  living  tissues  possessing  individuality  differentials 
and  species  differentials.  But  as  stated,  the  local  reactions  against  foreign 
bodies  do  not  show  the  fine  gradations  in  activity  of  the  host  cells  which  the 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  tissues  call  forth.  There  is,  here,  on  the 
whole,  a  marked  rigidity  noticeable,  although  the  degree  of  participation  of 
lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  is  very  irregular  and  appar- 
ently due  to  factors  which  cannot  be  foreseen  or  are  unknown,  in  contrast 
to  the  definite  orderly  manner  in  which  these  cells  react  against  the  autoge- 
nous, homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  differentials  of  living  tissues. 

In  contrast  to  these  non-living  substances  and  to  tissues  that  have  been 
killed  by  heat  or  by  chemical  substances,  living  tissues  possess  individuality 
and  species  differentials  which  call  forth  definite  graded  reactions  on  the  part 
of  the  host  cells  and  bodyfluids.  However,  as  we  have  seen,  indirectly  also  the 
tissue  differentials  of  the  grafts  may  under  certain  conditions  partake  in  these 
specific  reactions,  either  intensifying  or  weakening  them.  The  character  of 
different  tissues  belonging  to  the  same  donor  may  affect  the  reaction  against 
strange  individuality  differentials :  ( 1 )  by  variations  in  the  amounts  of  in- 
dividuality differentials  which  they  give  off;   (2)  by  the  differences  in  the 


200  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

strength  of  resistance  which  different  transplanted  tissues  oppose  to  the  in- 
jurious actions  of  the  bodyfluids  and  cells  of  a  host  possessing  different  in- 
dividuality differentials :  (3)  by  the  production  of  certain  degenerative  changes 
in  the  tissue,  which  may  increase  very  much  the  strength  of  the  lymphocytic 
reaction  of  the  host;  such  an  effect  we  have  observed  especially  with  trans- 
plants of  ovarian  and  adrenal-cortical  tissue ;  in  addition,  certain  specific  reac- 
tions may  take  place  between  two  adjoining  autogenous  tissues  within  the 
same  organism,  if  the  equilibrium  between  these  tissues  is  disturbed.  Such 
reactions  may,  for  instance,  take  place  between  autogenous  grafts  of  pig- 
mented skin  into  defects  of  white  skin  in  the  guinea  pig,  and  similar  reactions 
may  occur  between  the  squamous  epithelium  of  the  cervix  and  the  cylindrical 
epithelium  of  the  uterus,  particularly  under  the  influence  of  estrogenic  stimu- 
lation. 

Other  factors  of  a  secondary  nature  exist,  which  may  affect  the  strength 
and  character  of  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  organismal  differentials,  such 
as  age  of  host  or  donor  and  stimulation  leading  to  an  increase  in  the  growth 
momentum  of  the  transplanted  tissue.  This  increase  enables  the  graft  to  over- 
come various  obstacles  present  in  the  host  and  especially  also  an  unfavorable 
constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials.  In  particular,  hormones  which 
stimulate  the  transplanted  cells  to  grow  may  enable  them  better  to  withstand 
the  attacks  of  the  host.  There  may  be  associated  with  this  increase  in  growth 
momentum  a  diminished  differentiation  of  the  transplanted  tissue,  which  may 
also  indirectly  contribute  to  the  decrease  in  the  severity  of  the  reaction  of  the 
host  against  the  transplant.  We  have  seen  furthermore  that  there  are  loca- 
tions in  the  host  where  the  transplants  are,  to  some  extent,  protected  against 
the  host  reactions,  and  different  mechanisms  of  these  various  kinds  may  be 
active  in  different  places. 

As  to  the  character  of  these  organismal  differentials,  they  are  essentially 
genetically  determined,  but  they  are  not  identical  with  the  genes;  they  are 
gene  derivatives  which  lead  to  the  production  of  the  chemical  substances 
characteristic  of  these  differentials.  While  the  genes  in  the  donor  of  the  graft 
strange  to  the  host  are  mainly  responsible  for  the  intensity  of  the  host  reac- 
tion, there  are  some  indications  that  also  genes  in  the  host  which  are  not 
present  in  the  transplant,  may  play  a  certain  role  in  this  reaction.  However, 
it  seems  that  in  addition  the  ability  of  the  host  to  react  against  strange  indi- 
viduality differentials  may  vary.  The  mechanism  underlying  this  difference 
between  different  hosts  has  not  been  determined,  and  it  cannot  be  excluded  at 
present  that  the  function  of  certain  organs  or  tissues,  such  as  the  reticulo- 
endothelial system,  is  involved.  Besides,  different  species  to  which  the  hosts 
belong  differ  quite  distinctly  in  the  mode  of  their  reactions  against  a  strange 
individuality  differential. 

The  character  of  the  individuality  and  species  differentials  directly  or  in- 
directly determines  the  mutual  compatibility  or  incompatibility  of  two  differ- 
ent organisms;  but  there  does  not  exist  a  simple  reciprocal  relation  between 
the  reactions  of  individual  or  species  A  to  individual  or  species  B  or  vice 
versa,  but  it  follows  from  what  has  been  stated,  that  A  may  differ  from  B  in 


NATURE  OF  THE  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS    201 

its  functions  as  host  or  donor.  Furthermore,  while  the  organismal  differen- 
tials exert  primarily  a  direct  effect,  in  determining  the  reactions  of  the  host 
against  the  transplant,  secondarily  they  may  function  also  as  antigens  and 
call  forth  immune  reactions,  which  may  contribute  to  the  intensity  of  the  re- 
actions, although  to  an  unlike  degree  in  different  tissues.  As  to  the  number  of 
genes  which  are  involved  in  these  reactions,  it  is  in  all  probability  very  large, 
as  especially  the  experiments  with  closely  inbred  strains  suggest.  There  is  no 
indication  that  the  genes  determining  the  four  primary  blood-group  differen- 
tials are  the  genes  which  determine  the  nature  of  the  individuality  differen- 
tials ;  however,  if  we  consider  also  the  large  number  of  additional  differentials 
already  found  in  erythrocytes  by  means  of  agglutination  or  hemolysin  reac- 
tions,— a  number  which  will  probably  increase  still  more  in  the  future — ,  it 
appears  possible  that  the  gene  sets  from  which  the  blood  cell  antigens  de- 
velop and  the  individuality  differentials  will  more  and  more  tend  to  approxi- 
mate each  other. 

In  this  connection  it  may  be  stated  that  a  distinction  should  be  made  between 
the  terms  "individual  differential"  and  "individuality  differential."  The  for- 
mer may  be  regarded  as  the  more  general  term,  including  many  characteristics, 
which  differentiate  one  individual  from  another,  such  as  color  of  skin,  hair, 
eyes,  size,  shape  of  body  and  its  parts,  psychical  attributes  and  which  com- 
prise thus  the  organ  and  tissue  differentials.  In  contrast  to  these,  "individuality 
differential"  is  a  more  specific  term,  designating  a  definite  characteristic 
which  is  common  to  all  or  most  parts  of  one  individual  and  which  differen- 
tiates him  from  the  common  characteristic  denominator  in  another  individual. 

There  has  evolved,  as  the  result  of  a  long-continued  series  of  experiments, 
the  concept  of  individuality  and  species  differentials,  and,  in  general,  of 
organismal  differentials,  in  their  interactions  with  tissue  differentials  and 
various  other  factors  characterizing  the  organism.  This  evolution  was  a 
gradual  one,  taking  place  step  by  step,  in  close  connection  with  concepts  which 
were  prominent  at  certain  periods  in  the  development  of  biology  and  patholo- 
gy. We  may  distinguish  essentially  four  periods  in  this  development:  (1)  In 
the  first  period  transplantations  among  more  primitive  invertebrates  had 
proved  the  importance  of  the  polarity  of  tissues  and  of  other  structural  pecu- 
liarities affecting  the  harmony  between  grafted  parts  and  the  host,  and  these 
observations  were  generalized  and  applied  also  to  transplantations  in  higher 
vertebrates;  (2)  In  a  second  period  the  discoveries  concerning  active  im- 
munity and  anaphylaxis,  and  especially  those  concerning  agglutinins,  hemoly- 
sins and  precipitins,  very  strongly  influenced  the  interpretation  of  all  subse- 
quent experiments  in  transplantation ;  (3)  Later  Mendelian  concepts  of  hered- 
ity, following  the  revival  of  the  study  of  genetics  at  the  beginning  of  this  cen- 
tury, suggested  that  the  results  of  grafting  were  determined  by  the  presence  or 
absence,  in  the  host,  of  genes  which  the  grafted  tissue  needed  for  survival ;  (4) 
The  foregoing  data,  as  far  as  they  were  found  valid,  and  the  addition  of  new 
experimental  data  gave  then  origin  to  the  concept  of  the  various  types  of 
organismal  differentials  as  determiners  of  the  mode  and  intensity  of  inter- 
action between  different  organisms  and  their  parts. 


202  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

The  means  which  the  animal  organism  possesses  for  the  regulation  of  dis- 
turbances, initiating  reactions  tending  to  reestablish  a  state  of  equilibrium 
between  the  parts  of  an  individual,  are  relatively  limited.  Against  a  great 
variety  of  interferences  which  may  affect  an  organism,  the  latter  reacts  in  a 
very  similar  manner  making  use  of  the  small  number  of  reaction  patterns 
which  are  at  its  disposal,  in  accordance  with  its  inherited  constitution.  The 
variations  in  the  environmental  agents  which  act  on  the  organism  are  very 
much  greater  than  the  various  modes  of  reaction  which  the  affected  indi- 
vidual can  initiate,  but  a  gradation  in  the  kind  and  intensity  in  the  individu- 
ality differential  reactions  which  may  take  place  against  these  interfering  ele- 
ments can  be  noted.  No  reaction  occurs  against  living  parts  of  the  animal's 
own  body,  to  which  a  complete  adaptation  exists.  Likewise,  against  non-living 
constituents  of  the  environment,  other  than  protein  substances,  no  general 
or  specific  local  reaction  occurs.  Against  dead  protein  substances  the  lympho- 
cytes in  the  circulation,  and  presumably  those  of  the  lymphatic  organs,  react 
in  about  the  same  way  as  against  homoiogenous  individuality  differentials,  al- 
though locally  there  is  a  distinction  between  the  reactions  against  living 
homoiogenous  tissues  and  against  dead  material.  The  local  reaction  against 
all  foreign  bodies,  whether  of  protein  or  non-protein  nature,  is  in  principle 
the  same,  tending  to  destroy,  to  transform  and  to  incorporate  the  strange  ma- 
terial into  the  body  in  a  way  which  is  least  injurious  to  the  organism.  However, 
certain  heterogenous  material,  non-living  but  containing  formerly  living  ele- 
ments such  as  blood  clots,  if  introduced  into  the  organism  may  call  forth  a 
local  reaction  corresponding  to  that  seen  after  implantation  of  heterogenous 
living  tissues.  Also,  the  general  blood-cell  reaction  is  stronger  against  more 
complex  heterogenous  proteins  than  against  the  simpler  ones.  Thus  injections 
of  heterogenous  blood  sera  elicit  merely  a  lymphocytic  reaction,  whereas,  sub- 
cutaneous implantation  of  more  complex  proteins,  such  as  heterogenous  fibrin- 
ogen induce  a  typical  heterogenous  blood-cell  reaction. 

There  are  thus  increasing  intensities  and  specificities  of  reactions  noted  if 
non-living  substances  of  different  degrees  of  chemical  complexity  are  intro- 
duced into  the  body;  but  the  maximal  specificity  in  reaction  is  attained  only 
if  living  tissues,  bearing  strange  organismal  differentials,  are  transplanted.  It 
is  therefore  those  substances  which  are  most  nearly  related  to  the  characteris- 
tic constituents  of  living  tissues  namely  the  most  complex  proteins  which  call 
forth  reactions  most  similar  to  those  elicited  by  the  tissues  themselves. 

We  see,  then,  that  the  reactions  against  strange  individuality  and  species 
differentials  are  not  entirely  disconnected  and  newly  created  responses  of  the 
organism  against  interferences,  but  they  represent  the  endstage  of  a  series  of 
interactions  which  are  graded  in  specificity  in  accordance  with  the  increasing 
complexity  in  the  structure  of  the  strange  environmental  elements,  and  in  ac- 
cordance with  the  increasing  similarity  between  their  constitution  and  the 
constitution  of  living  tissues. 


IDorf"  The  Phylogenetic  and  Ontogenetic  Development 

of  Individuality  and  Organismal  Differentials 


Chapter  I 

Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Coelenterates 

and  Planarians 

In  the  foregoing  part  we  have  discussed  the  organismal  differentials 
and  their  relations  to  organ  and  tissue  differentials  in  the  very  complex, 
phylogenetically  higher  organisms ;  in  a  subsequent  part  we  shall  discuss 
these  differentials  also  in  certain  pathological  growths,  which  develop  in 
vertebrates  under  abnormal  conditions  of  stimulation.  We  now  intend  to 
undertake  the  same  analysis  in  normal  invertebrates  and  lower  vertebrates. 
In  each  class  of  animals  we  wish  to  determine  how  far  transplantation  of 
parts  of  organisms  indicates  the  presence  of  organismal  differentials  and 
what  the  relations  of  the  organismal  differentials  are  to  the  organ  and  tissue 
differentials. 

In  adult  birds  and  mammals  there  is  a  very  strong  reaction  against  strange 
individuality  differentials,  and  against  strange  organismal  differentials  in 
general ;  the  normal  equilibrium  is  strictly  autogenous ;  it  depends  upon  the 
presence  of  the  same  individuality  differential  in  all  the  important  tissues 
and  organs,  and  it  is  disturbed  and  leads  to  notable  reactions  if  small  parts 
of  tissues  possessing  a  strange  individuality  differential  are  introduced  into 
the  animal  body.  The  strong  cellular  reactions  of  the  organism  against  inter- 
ferences with  its  structural  integrity  indicate  that  this  tissue  equilibrium  is 
relatively  fixed  and  rigid.  The  replacement  of  lost  parts  by  the  organism 
is  very  much  restricted  and  the  reactions  which  take  place,  ultimately  tend 
to  maintain  or  restore  the  characteristic  structural  pattern  of  the  individual. 
Associated  with  this  fixity  is  the  great  complexity  and  differentiation  in  the 
tissues  of  each  individual,  which  does  not  allow  fargoing  adaptations  to  new 
environmental  conditions  or  a  nevvformation  of  lost  parts.  The  individual 
represents,  therefore,  a  rigid  autogenous  equilibrium  between  its  constituent 
parts. 

It  was  of  interest  to  determine  whether  this  association  between  the  degree 
of  sensitiveness  to  and  of  reactivity  against  strange  organismal  differentials, 
and  the  degree  of  structural  fixity  and  rigidity  of  an  organism  extends  through 
the  whole  phylogenetic  development.  Such  a  parallelism  would  suggest  that 
a  causal  relation  exists  between  these  two  sets  of  factors. 

The  special  conditions  confronting  investigations  in  these  more  primitive 
organisms  have  made  necessary  in  many  cases  different  methods  of  experi- 
mentation. Instead  of  transplanting  small  pieces  of  tissues  or  organs,  a  method 

203 


204  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

commonly  used  in  the  case  of  higher  organisms,  in  the  more  primitive  ani- 
mals, as  a  rule,  larger  parts  are  joined  together.  In  some  instances  they  are 
so  large  that  the  procedure  is  comparable  to  parabiosis  rather  than  to  ordinary 
tissue  transplantation,  except  that  in  the  typical  parabiosis  the  size  of  the 
area  of  union  between  the  two  partners  is  usually  much  smaller  than  in 
transplantation  as  practiced  in  lower  organisms.  However,  it  is  not  only  the 
size  of  the  pieces  joined  together  which  suggests  a  comparison  with  parabio- 
sis, but  also  the  fact  that  in  invertebrates  parts  of  organisms  have,  on  the 
whole,  a  much  greater  capacity  to  carry  on  an  independent  life  and  to  restitute 
the  whole  organism  than  the  corresponding  pieces  in  vertebrates.  The  pieces 
to  be  joined  together  are  therefore  usually  more  independent  of  each  other 
and  more  self-sufficient  than  is  the  case  in  ordinary  transplantation  in  higher 
organisms.  We  might  also  express  these  differences  by  distinguishing  be- 
tween organismal  transplantations  in  which  organisms  or  parts  of  organisms 
capable  of  independent  life  and  of  restitution  into  whole  organisms  are  joined 
together,  and  tissue  or  organ  transplantations  in  which  the  transplants  are 
devoid  of  such  capabilities. 

It  is  not  our  aim  to  survey  the  whole  field  of  transplantations  in  inverte- 
brates and  lower  vertebrate  classes  as  such,  but  to  use  these  experiments 
merely  as  a  means  for  the  study  of  the  organismal  differences  in  their  func- 
tion of  sustaining  the  tissue  and  organ  equilibrium,  and  making  thereby  pos- 
sible the  maintenance  of  the  individual  organism.  It  is  especially  the  experi- 
ments on  coelenterates  and  planarians  of  Jacques  Loeb,  T.  H.  and  L.  V. 
Morgan,  Wetzel,  Peebles,  H.  D.  King,  E.  N.  Browne,  Rand,  Issayew,  Child, 
Goetsch,  Burt,  Mutz  and  Santos  on  which  our  conclusions  are  based. 

A.  Organismal  Differentials  and  Organ  and  Tissue  Equilibria 

in  Coelenterates 

In  a  general  way  it  can  be  stated  that  two  sets  of  factors  determine  in 
coelenterates  the  kind  of  organ  which  is  to  be  formed  and  its  localization, 
namely  (1)  a  more  or  less  rudimentary  preformed  differentiation  of  the 
various  parts  of  the  body  of  an  organism,  and  (2)  the  ability  of  parts  of  the 
organism  to  undergo  structural  changes  and  to  restitute  a  whole  organism 
from  parts  under  varied  conditions  of  the  inner  or  outer  environment.  Instead 
of  the  relative  fixity  in  the  structural  relations  between  the  various  tissues 
and  organs  which  is  characteristic  of  higher  organisms,  we  find  here  a 
primitive  and  very  incomplete  differentiation,  associated  with  a  great  degree 
of  plasticity  in  the  modes  of  response  to  altered  conditions.  It  seems  that 
each  part  of  the  organism  has  a  tendency  to  produce  a  certain  area  of  the 
organism  or  a  certain  organ  system  (pole)  rather  than  another  one,  but  often 
this  tendency  can  be  overcome;  moreover,  the  readiness  with  which  organs, 
other  than  those  normally  occurring  in  a  given  area,  can  be  induced  to  form 
by  experimental  means  (heteromorphosis)  differs  in  different  parts  of  the 
organism,  the  resistance  being  greater  in  those  areas  where  the  preformed 
organization,  rudimentary  though  it  is,  tends  to  the  formation  of  a  more  or 
less  well  differentiated  organ  area. 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  205 

The  existence  of  a  rudimentary  differentiation  in  coelenterates   is  well 
exemplified  in  the  experiment  of  Burt,  who  showed  that  rings  taken  from 
the  anterior  pole  have,  after  transplantation,  a  greater  tendency  to  form  heads 
than  have  foot  pieces,  which  latter  have  a  greater  tendency  to  form  a  foot, 
although  in  exceptional  cases  here,  also,  a  rudimentary  head  formation  with 
tentacles  can  be  induced.  This  predifferentiation  can  be  overcome  under  cer- 
tain conditions :  ( 1 )  By  the  application  of  various  external  factors.  In  this 
way  Jacques  Loeb  first  produced  heteromorphosis  in  Tubularia.   (2)   Also 
by  the  action  of  factors  present  within  the  organism;  namely,  when  certain 
differentiated  areas,  in  some  cases  strange  organs,  introduced  by  means  of 
transplantation,  extend  their  influence  to  other  areas.  Here  we  must  again 
distinguish  two  sets  of  factors:  (a)  The  action  of  contact  substances,  or — 
to  use  a  more  general  term — contact  mechanisms.  Through  contact  with  a 
differentiated  transplant,  as,  for  instance,  with  the  head  of  a  Hydra,  the 
anterior  pole  or  the  foot  region  of  the  host  can  be  induced  to  form,  at  or  near 
the  place  of  contact,  an  organ  corresponding  to  the  transplanted  head.  In  this 
case  we  must  assume  that  contact  mechanisms  (contact  substances)  induce 
a  heteromorphosis,  inasmuch  as  a  new  formation  takes  place  at  a  point  where 
normally  another  part  of  the  organism  would  have  developed.  Thus,  a  head 
may  be  induced  to  form  in  a  place  where  normally  a  foot  had  been,  or  it  may 
form  in  the  middle  zone.  The  resistance  to  such  a  head  formation  is  greater 
at  the  aboral  part  than  at  the  oral  part,  owing  to  the  predifferentiation  of  the 
host  organism.  We  have,  here,  to  deal  with  an  organizer  action  comparable 
to  that  which  plays  so  important  a  role  during  embryonal  development.  It  is 
especially  transplantation  of  a  regenerating  hydranth,  but  also  of  other  kinds 
of  tissues,  such  as  parts  of  Hydra  buds  and  peristome,  which  in  a  specific 
manner  induces  the  formation  of  hydranths  in  Hydra  viridis  (E.  N.  Browne, 
Goldsmith).  In  addition  to  these  factors  which  thus  lead  to  the  formation  of 
supplementary  organs,  there  may  be  active  another  factor,  which  consists 
in  the  tendency  of  an  organ  to  inhibit  the  formation  of  an  organ  of  the  same 
kind,  especially  in  its  close  proximity.  From  such  a  near  point  this  inhibiting 
influence  may  be  transmitted  to  more  distant  parts,  but  apparently  with 
decreasing  intensity,  (b)  Factors  of  a  regenerative  or  restitutive  character. 
These  may  tend  to  supplement  a  part  of  an  organism  which  has  been  separated 
from  the  rest,  in  such  a  way  that  the  formation  of  a  whole  organism  results. 
In  this  latter  interaction  a  more  differentiated  tissue  again  is  generally  more 
potent  in  determining  what  organs  shall  be  produced,  than  one  less  differen- 
tiated— it  is  the  dominating,  directing  constituent  of  the  organism.  Moreover, 
a  larger  part  usually  prevails  over  a  smaller  part,  other  conditions  being 
equal.  While  the  organizer  action  in  coelenterates  mentioned  above  may  lead 
to  the  reproduction  of  the  same  organs  as  are  present  in  the  organism,  the 
regenerative  tendency  on  the  other  hand  leads  to  the  newformation  of  sup- 
plementary, therefore  of  different,  organs  or  areas.  There  is  another,  more 
definite  difference  between  the  mode  of  action  of  such  an  organizer  and  of 
the  integrative  restitutive  or  regenerative  factors.  The  former  acts,  as  stated, 
presumably  through  contact  substances  or  contact  mechanisms,  while  the 


206  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

latter  extend  their  sphere  of  influence  to  distant  parts,  perhaps  through  diffu- 
sion of  contact  substances  into  distant  areas  of  the  body.  Thus  a  well  dif- 
ferentiated organ  may  be  able  to  force  a  distant  part  of  a  transplant  to  form 
a  heteromorphic  organ,  counter  to  its  normal  rudimentary  differentiation. 
In  this  case,  the  size  of  the  transplant  becomes  one  of  the  determining  factors. 
If  the  transplant  exceeds  a  certain  size,  then  its  rudimentary  preformed 
differentiation  is  able  to  control  the  regenerative,  heteromorphic  tendency  of 
the  host  organ.  Such  a  predifferentiation  in  the  transplant  may  determine  the 
mode  in  which  the  whole  organism  shall  be  formed,  its  integrative  action 
inducing  the  formation  of  oral  and  aboral  organs  in  accordance  with  the 
structure  of  the  transplant,  which  may  thus  dominate  over  the  integrative 
tendencies  in  the  host.  If  a  small  piece  is  transplanted,  there  is  evidently  not 
enough  material  present  to  allow  its  predifferentiation  to  assert  itself,  because 
its  opposite  poles  are  very  near  to  each  other;  the  host,  which  is  the  larger 
partner,  then  dominates  and  apparently  induces  degenerative  processes  in 
the  transplant,  leading  to  its  absorption.  Perhaps  the  amount  of  active  sub- 
stance produced  by  short  pieces  is  too  small  to  overcome  the  opposing  tend- 
encies inherent  in  a  larger  piece. 

A  lack  of  a  sufficient  degree  of  predifferentiation  in  the  transplant  may 
be  the  reason  why,  under  certain  conditions,  it  cannot  maintain  itself  in 
competition  with  the  host  and,  instead,  is  absorbed  by  the  latter.  This  applies 
especially  to  pieces  from  the  middle  zone;  and,  correspondingly,  the  middle 
zone  of  the  host,  by  not  inducing  differentiation  in  a  transplant,  may  lead  to 
its  absorption.  On  the  other  hand,  if,  as  a  result  of  the  combined  organizer 
and  regenerative  action,  a  part  of  an  organism  has  been  duplicated,  the 
restitutive  tendency  can  lead  to  a  separation  of  the  duplications,  which  may 
be  followed  by  the  formation  of  two  independent  organisms. 

The  tendency  to  supplement  by  regeneration  a  part  of  an  organism  in  such 
a  way  that  a  whole  predifferentiated  organism  develops  has  a  counterpart  in 
the  tendency  to  form  a  normal  whole  from  an  organism,  in  which,  through 
transplantation,  a  surplus  of  certain  organs,  for  instance,  tentacles,  has  been 
produced.  The  disequilibrium  thus  induced  leads  either  to  certain  degenerative 
processes,  presumably  agglutination  and  reduction,  or  it  may  act  as  a  stimulus 
to  the  production  of  certain  organs,  an  effect  which  indirectly  brings  about  the 
loss  of  excessive  parts.  The  predifferentiated  organism  represents  an  equili- 
brated system,  and  disturbances  in  this  system  initiate  various  reactions  aiming 
at  the  restitution  of  its  equilibrium.  It  is  remarkable  how  varied  and  different 
the  mechanisms  are  which  in  the  end  all  lead  to  the  same  result,  the  integrative 
newformation  of  an  equilibrated  whole. 

In  the  experiments  on  which  these  conclusions  are  based  transplants  influ- 
enced the  host  and  induced  in  it  the  newformation  of  organs,  thus  acting  as 
organizers,  or  in  other  cases  the  transplants  influenced  the  restitutive,  regen- 
erative activities  of  the  host  by  actions  at  a  distance;  conversely,  the  host  in- 
fluenced, under  certain  conditions,  also  the  regenerative  or  restitutive  activity 
of  the  transplant.  In  these  instances,  as  stated,  certain  organs,  usually  the 
more  differentiated  ones,  are  dominant  over  others  and  force  those  parts  of 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  207 

the  organism  which  are  not  yet  fully  differentiated,  to  differentiate  in  such  a 
way  that  the  dominating  directing  organ  is  supplemented  and  that  a  complete 
organism  develops.  There  are  indications  that  the  greatest  potency  of  a  certain 
part  is  required  if  it  is  to  function  as  an  organizer  and  this  is  an  attribute 
mainly  of  the  head,  while  apparently  less  potency  is  required  for  the  regenera- 
tive, integrative  function  of  inducing  supplementary  organ  formation  and  of 
attaining  in  this  way  the  formation  of  a  whole  organism  by  regenerative 
means.  Those  parts  which  are  functionally  and  structurally  indifferent,  such 
as  the  middle  piece,  cannot  act  as  organizers,  nor  can  they  induce  regeneration. 
The  potential  growth  energy  which  is  present  in  so  marked  a  degree  in  these 
primitive  organisms,  as  exemplified  in  their  response  to  inductive  regenerative 
influences  and  to  organizer  action,  lies  dormant  in  the  normal  organism ;  the 
mechanisms  which  cause  induction  of  complementary  parts  and  inhibit  forma- 
tion of  similar  parts  are  not  ordinarily  manifest.  At  each  point  the  normal 
contact  mechanisms  are  active  and  keep  the  various  parts  in  a  quiescent  state  ; 
but  as  soon  as  (through  a  cut  or  otherwise)  this  normal  action  of  contact  sub- 
stances is  disturbed,  local  growth  processes  set  in,  which  are  determined  in 
their  character  by  a  localized  rudimentary  differentiation,  by  regenerative 
and  integrative  processes,  such  as  induction  and  inhibition  at  a  distance,  by 
organizer  effects,  and  by  environmental  factors,  all  interacting  with  each 
other.  This  interaction  leads  to  the  establishment  of  a  new  equilibrium  which 
takes  the  place  of  the  previous  disturbed  equilibrium,  and  the  most  stable 
equilibrium  is  reached  when  complete  individuals  are  integrated.  Within  these 
individuals  the  component  parts  are  again  equilibrized. 

However,  a  wound  not  only  disturbs  the  regulating  and  inhibiting  influences 
which  originate  in  the  remaining  parts  of  the  organism  and  which  would 
normally  act  on  the  wounded  area,  but  it  exerts  also  a  direct  stimulating  effect 
on  the  tissues  thus  affected  and  its  influence  seems  to  extend  even  over  a 
relatively  great  distance,  accelerating  the  formation  of  a  hydranth  on  removal 
of  the  inhibition  existing  normally.  Through  wound  stimulation  the  organism 
or  parts  of  it  are  transformed  in  such  a  way  that  they  resemble,  in  their  be- 
havior and  reactions,  organisms  during  the  budding,  reproductive  state,  when 
they  are  very  plastic  and  possess  a  greater  growth  momentum.  We  find  here  a 
condition  analogous  to  the  autogenous  regulating  mechanisms  which  deter- 
mine tissue  equilibrium  also  in  higher  organisms  and  the  kind  of  disturbance 
in  this  equilibrium  which  follows  injury.  However,  the  relative  importance  of 
the  various  factors  which  become  potent  following  the  making  of  a  wound 
cannot  be  exactly  determined  at  the  present  time. 

Predifferentiation  and  coordinated  integrative  actions  not  only  manifest 
themselves  through  mechanisms  which  cause  completion  of  incomplete  or- 
ganisms, but  there  must  exist  in  addition,  mechanisms  which  lead  to  degenera- 
tion of  excess  tissues  or  organs ;  we  have  referred  to  the  resorption  of  small 
parts  which  do  not  possess  a  pronounced  differentiation.  There  may  occur  also 
a  coalescence  of  two  small  partners  to  form  a  single  organism. 

We  may  then  conclude  from  these  data  that  what  corresponds  to  the  fixed 
organ  differentials  of  higher  organisms,  is,  in  the  coelenterates,  still  in  a  very 


208  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

plastic,  modifiable  condition.  It  is  due  to  this  plasticity  of  organ  differentials 
and  to  the  readiness  with  which  transformations  and  newformations  of  organ 
systems  and  parts  of  the  body  take  place  that  individuals  are  restituted  from 
parts.  But  this  factor  alone  would  not  insure  the  ready  restitution  of  in- 
dividuality. There  must  be  added  to  it  a  certain  autogenous  state  in  which 
organ  systems  interact  perfectly  in  such  a  manner  that  a  relatively  stable 
equilibrium  is  maintained.  Some  of  the  mechanisms  which  participate  in  the 
maintenance  of  this  equilibrium  we  have  analyzed  in  the  preceding  pages. 
Any  disturbance  in  this  autogenous  equilibrium,  consisting  in  the  balancing 
of  these  organ  systems,  activates  mechanisms  which  result  in  the  integration 
of  the  organism.  It  is  the  relative  lack  of  fixity  in  organ  differentials,  their 
ability  to  change  within  certain  limits,  that  make  possible  the  integrative  activity 
of  the  mechanisms  leading  to  the  restoration  of  the  individual. 

So  far,  we  have  analyzed  the  interaction  of  organs  and  organ  differentials 
and  their  significance  in  the  maintenance  of  the  equilibrium  which  makes 
possible  the  integration  of  parts  into  the  individual  organism.  We  shall  now 
compare  with  the  nature  of  this  equilibrium,  the  mode  of  action  of  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials  in  this  class  of  animals.  Here  we  notice  that  the  plas- 
ticity of  the  organ  differentials  is  somehow  bound  up  with  a  relative  lack  of 
fixity  of  the  organismal  differentials,  or  at  least  of  the  effects  which  differ- 
ences in  organismal  differentials  would  induce  in  higher  organisms. 

We  find,  accordingly,  that  in  Hydra  auto-  and  homoiotransplantations  seem 
to  succeed  equally  well ;  similarly,  there  seems  to  be  no  difference  in  the  results 
when  several  autogenous  or  homoiogenous  pieces  are  joined  together,  the 
integrative  as  well  as  the  organizer  impulses  being  transmitted  in  a  normal 
manner  from  one  piece  to  the  other.  At  the  point  of  union  corresponding 
tissues  of  homoiotransplants  and  host  may  unite  perfectly  in  Hydra,  without 
any  scar  remaining  visible.  Homoiotransplantation  in  Hydra  succeeds  very 
well,  even  if  the  two  partners  have  been  made  unequal  in  their  contents  in 
algae.  However,  we  must  not  necessarily  conclude  from  these  experiments  that 
homoiodifferentials  do  not  exist  in  these  organisms.  While  this  may  per- 
haps be  the  case,  there  still  remains  the  possibility  that  they  do  exist  in  a 
rudimentary  form,  but  that  they  are  not  strongly  enough  developed  to  lead 
to  noticeable  reactions  and  that  the  tissues  have  a  power  of  resistance  suffi- 
cient to  overcome  unfavorable  conditions  caused  by  a  difference  in  organismal 
differentials.  With  this  conclusion  harmonizes  also  the  observation  that  while 
in  organisms  like  Tubularia  homoiotransplantation  may  apparently  be  per- 
fect, yet  in  some  cases  separation  between  host  and  transplant  takes  place 
after  a  time. 

The  results  of  heterotransplantation  differ  noticeably  from  those  of  homoio- 
transplantation. Even  if  the  transplantation  succeeds,  the  differences  in  race 
or  species  differentials  may  cause  the  union  to  take  place  more  slowly  and  the 
resulting  combination  may  only  be  temporary,  separation  occurring  perhaps 
at  a  later  date.  On  the  other  hand,  it  seems  that  union  of  different  species  may 
permanently  succeed  in  certain  instances.  In  Hydra  the  union  of  heterografts 
may,  however,  not  be  so  firm  as  that  of  homoiograf ts ;  the  surface  of  contact 
between  the  species  may  at  first  become  smaller,  until  at  last  some  mechanical 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  209 

factor,  such  as  a  pull,  can  produce  separation.  Furthermore,  nerve  stimulation 
may  fail  to  be  transmitted  from  one  partner  to  the  other.  This  incompatibility 
between  adjoining  surfaces  is  also  evident  in  the  experiments  of  Peebles  in 
Hydractinia.  When  a  piece  of  Pennaria  was  grafted  on  Tubularia,  the 
coenosarc  united  temporarily,  but  no  union  of  the  perisarc  took  place,  and 
after  formation  of  the  hydranths  the  pieces  disintegrated.  Similarly,  the  union 
between  Eudendrium  and  Pennaria  was  only  imperfect  and  temporary.  While 
here  homoiotransplantation  may,  at  least  in  some  cases,  be  perfect,  in  hetero- 
transplantation the  union  of  the  coenosarc  does  not  last,  and  if  farther  distant 
species  are  used,  injurious  effects  become  still  more  noticeable. 

In  general,  buds  develop,  as  H.  D.  King  has  shown,  at  the  point  of  union 
of  two  different  kinds  of  organisms;  these  represent  a  mixture  of  the  con- 
stituents of  both  partners  and  thus  constitute  a  chimaera.  When  the  organis- 
mal  differentials  of  the  two  partners  are  markedly  similar,  the  mixture  is  more 
complete  and  the  character  of  the  tissue  interaction  differs  from  that  seen 
when  the  organismal  differentials  have  less  similarity.  In  the  latter  instance 
parts  of  one  organism  have  a  tendency  to  penetrate  as  a  connected  mass  into 
the  other,  the  constituents  of  both  partners  remaining  more  separate  and  dis- 
tinct than  when  the  organismal  differentials  are  very  much  alike.  In  a  very 
interesting  way  the  domination  of  one  organism  over  the  other,  when  they 
differ  in  the  constitution  of  their  organismal  differentials,  has  been  shown  in 
the  experiments  of  Goetsch  and  Issayew,  who  found  that  when  two  individuals 
belonging  to  different  species  are  united  into  one  organism,  budding  often  takes 
place,  the  buds  representing  chimaerae  of  various  kinds  in  which,  however, 
the  constituents  from  one  of  the  two  species  predominate.  Issayew  obtained 
chimaerae  also  by  cutting  individuals  from  two  different  species  into  small 
particles,  which,  when  mixed,  united  to  form  one  complete  organism  repre- 
senting a  mosaic  of  both  partners.  The  union  of  Pelmatohydra  oligactis  and 
Hydra  vulgaris  into  a  chimaera  leads  to  a  struggle  between  the  constituents  of 
the  two  partners,  in  which  the  former  gradually  infiltrates  and  almost  replaces 
the  latter;  Pelmatohydra  dominates  and  apparently  only  certain  interstitial 
cells  of  Hydra  vulgaris  remain  preserved.  The  buds  from  such  chimaerae  may 
be  either  Pelmatohydra  or  a  mixture  of  both  species.  The  remaining  inter- 
stitial cells  of  Hydra  vulgaris  are  totipotent  and  may  give  rise  to  whole 
organisms. 

The  dominance  of  one  species  over  another  in  heterotransplantation  may 
also  become  manifest  in  another  way.  If  an  excess  of  tentacles  has  been  pro- 
duced as  a  result  of  transplantations,  the  dominant  species  may  determine 
the  number  of  tentacles  which  shall  be  absorbed  and,  in  the  end,  the  number 
which  is  characteristic  of  the  dominant  species  remains.  We  see  that  even  in 
this  case  of  heterotransplantation  the  integrative  factors,  tending  towards  the 
reestablishment  of  an  organ  equilibrium  which  accords  with  the  predifferen- 
tiation  of  the  dominant  species,  are  active.  As  a  rule,  that  species  which,  in  the 
separate  state  is  the  more  vigorous  one  dominates.  We  shall  find  also  in 
amphibians  joined  together  in  embryonal  stages,  a  dominance  of  one  partner 
over  the  other,  in  accordance  with  the  more  rapid  growth  and  greater  size  of 
one  of  these  species  in  the  free-living  stage. 


210  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

While  thus  the  difference  in  race-  and  speciesdifferentials  in  the  pieces 
joined  together  may  lead  to  antagonistic  actions  between  the  tissue  consti- 
tuents of  the  different  grafts,  yet  to  a  certain  extent  it  is  possible  for  the 
tissues  in  such  buds  and  chimaerae  to  live  and  grow  side  by  side  without  the 
manifestation  of  a  hostile  reaction.  Somewhat  comparable  results  can  be  ob- 
tained, as  we  shall  see  later,  in  the  transplantation  of  regenerative  buds  of 
extremities  in  amphibia,  in  the  ingrowing  of  sidelines  from  one  partner  into 
the  other  in  heterotransplanted  amphiban  larvae,  or,  as  we  have  mentioned 
already,  in  the  ingrowth  of  a  nerve  from  one  partner  into  the  other  in  para- 
biosis in  rats.  In  all  of  these  conditions  there  is  a  lack  of  manifest  reaction  on 
the  part  of  tissues  which  are  in  close  contact  with  each  other,  although  they 
differ  in  their  organismal  differentials.  In  such  cases  we  have  to  deal  either 
with  ontogenetically  or  phylogenetically  very  primitive  forms,  or  with  re- 
generating tissue  which  does  not  yet  possess  the  fully  developed  organismal 
differentials,  or  at  least  the  mechanism  of  reaction  against  such  differentials. 
In  the  case  of  parabiosis  in  rats  we  may  have  to  deal  with  relatively  slight 
differences  in  organismal  differentials. 

In  accordance  with  the  experiments  mentioned  above,  Mutz  found  that 
pieces  of  Hydra  and  Pelmatohydra  can  be  joined  together  in  the  long  axis  of 
the  body,  the  different  constituents  retaining  the  character  of  their  own 
species.  However,  the  growing  together  takes  place  with  much  greater  diffi- 
culty than  in  homoiotransplantations  and  for  a  long  time  the  place  of  union 
remains  visible;  but  in  the  end  a  uniform,  apparently  normal  Hydra,  though 
in  reality  representing  a  chimaera,  may  result  from  this  transplantation.  On 
the  other  hand,  the  green  Chloro hydra  cannot  be  joined  to  the  brown  Pelma- 
tohydra, to  Hydra  vulgaris  or  Hydra  attenuata,  separation  taking  place  within 
eight  days.  It  seems  that  in  this  case  the  presence  of  algae  in  Chlorohydra 
intensifies  the  difficulties  of  heterotransplantation.  While  in  the  case  of 
homoiotransplantation  algae  do  not  interfere  seriously  with  the  result,  this  is 
not  so  if  distinct  races  or  species  of  Hydra  are  combined;  then,  the  presence 
of  Algae  increases  the  incompatibility  between  the  partners,  as  the  experi- 
ments of  Goetsch  have  shown.  But  even  if  the  number  of  algae  is  approximate- 
ly the  same  in  different  partners,  there  still  remains  noticeable  the  difference 
in  race  or  species  constitution.  If  the  head  of  Hydra  vulgaris  or  attenuata  is 
transplanted  to  Pelmatohydra,  the  union  between  transplant  and  host  is  only 
a  temporary  one,  lasting  usually  from  three  to  five  days,  or,  at  most,  two 
weeks.  In  this  instance,  the  transplant  is  not  able  to  act  as  readily  as  an  or- 
ganizer, inducing  a  head  formation  in  the  host,  as  it  would  have  been  if  the 
transplant  and  host  had  been  homoiogenous.  There  forms,  instead,  at  first  a 
bridge  of  tissue,  growing  from  the  host  in  the  direction  towards  the  transplant. 
This  bridge  represents  a  somewhat  indifferent  kind  of  tissue  in  which  tenta- 
cles are  lacking;  but  after  separation  of  the  transplanted  head  and  host  has 
taken  place,  it  may  develop  in  some  cases  into  a  small  head,  while  in  others  it 
is  drawn  into  the  host  and  absorbed.  The  organizer  action  is  therefore  inter- 
fered with  in  such  a  heterotransplantation.  However,  when  reciprocal  or- 
ganismal transplantations  of  pieces  of  Pelmatohydra  and  Hydra  attenuata 
are  made,  the  two  pieces  may  remain  united  long  enough  to  make  possible  the 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  211 

restitution  of  a  head  in  the  headless  part,  although  also  in  this  type  of  hetero- 
transplantation certain  disturbances  appear ;  thus,  distance  actions  which  take 
place  in  cases  of  homoiotransplantation,  leading  to  reversal  of  polarity 
(heteromorphosis)  in  the  transplant  or  to  the  formation  of  buds  in  the  host 
under  the  influence  of  the  transplant,  do  not  occur.  There  is,  therefore,  under 
these  conditions  an  interference  with  the  transmission  of  the  regenerative  or 
organizer  influence,  which  under  other  circumstances  would  have  passed  from 
host  to  partner,  or  vice  versa.  For  the  most  part,  either  an  absorption  of  the 
transplant  takes  place  in  these  heterotransplantations,  or  the  grafted  head 
separates  from  the  host.  We  may  then  conclude  that  after  heterotransplanta- 
tion incompatibilities  develop  between  the  partners  or  between  a  transplanted 
organ  and  the  host  at  the  point  of  union.  This  often  leads  to  early  separation 
and,  in  addition,  difficulties  may  possibly  develop  in  the  passage  of  active  sub- 
stances from  one  organism  into  the  other. 

We  must  now  inquire  how  far  the  reactions  which  have  been  observed  when 
we  unite  organisms  belonging  to  different  species  or  races  in  hydrozoa,  can  be 
considered  as  due  to  differences  in  organismal  differentials.  There  are  two 
circumstances  which  favor  this  interpretation:  (1)  The  severity  of  these  in- 
compatibilities corresponds  approximately  to  the  distance  of  relationship  be- 
tween the  parts  which  are  joined  together,  and  (2)  the  reactions  after  hetero- 
transplantation seem  to  occur  irrespective  of  the  place  where  the  two  strange 
organisms  are  united ;  this  fact  suggests  the  presence  of  the  same  organismal 
differential  in  all  parts  of  the  same  individual. 

As  stated  above,  while  in  general  only  heterodifferentials  lead  to  noticeable 
incompatibilities  in  hydrozoa,  we  cannot  therefore  conclude  that  individuality 
differentials  do  not  exist  in  these  primitive  forms.  We  must  consider  the 
possibility  that  each  individual  within  a  race  or  species  has  its  own  individu- 
ality differential,  which  differs  from  that  of  every  other  individual,  but  that 
the  incompatibilities  which  result  from  these  differences  between  differentials 
in  the  lower  types  of  animals  are  too  slight,  in  proportion  to  the  resistance  of 
the  affected  tissues,  for  injurious  agencies  to  become  manifest.  It  is  this  rela- 
tion between  the  degree  of  incompatibility,  the  resulting  injurious  reaction  on 
the  one  hand,  and  the  resistance  of  the  transplant,  which  might  be  expected  to 
determine  the  degree  of  disequilibrium  arising  from  differences  in  the  differ- 
entials. If  the  individuality  differentials  are  as  yet  only  very  slightly  developed, 
the  incompatibility  resulting  from  the  union  of  parts  of  different  individuals 
may  not  become  evident.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  possible,  after  all,  that  in- 
dividuality differentials  are  not  yet  present  in  these  primitive  organisms.  The 
second  alternative  might  even  be  the  more  probable  one,  because  there  is 
reason  for  assuming  that  in  young  vertebrate  embryos  fully  developed  indi- 
viduality differentials  do  not  as  yet  exist.  By  analogy  we  may  extend  this  con- 
clusion also  to  adult  individuals  belonging  to  very  primitive  vertebrates. 

We  must  now  return  to  a  discussion  of  the  conditions  which  maintain  the 
normal  organism  in  a  definite  formative  and  functional  equilibrium,  and  of 
the  similarities  or  the  differences  observed  between  higher  and  lower  organ- 
isms in  this  respect.  In  higher  organisms  such  a  formative  equilibrium  de- 
pends, in  part  at  least,  on  local  conditions  affecting  the  tissues;  interactions 


212  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

take  place  between  adjoining  tissues  which  are  of  a  regulatory  character  and 
keep  the  animal  equilibrated.  However,  distance  substances,  in  the  form  of 
hormones,  may  also  participate  in  this  equilibrium  as  secondary  factors, 
though  their  action  is  less  important  and  more  specialized.  In  the  case  of 
hydrozoa,  conditions  are  in  some  essential  respects  similar  to  those  of  higher 
organisms ;  the  equilibrium  depends  on  local  and  distant  factors  and  it  can  be 
disturbed  through  local  as  well  as  through  distant  changes ;  also,  there  is  reason 
for  assuming  that  in  both  instances  definite  substances  mediate  these  effects. 
Furthermore,  in  these  primitive  organisms  the  organismal  differentials,  as  well 
as  what  corresponds  to  organ  and  tissue  differentials  in  higher  organisms,  par- 
ticipate in  the  maintenance  of  an  equilibrium;  but  the  particular  structure 
and  function  of  adjoining  autogenous  parts  of  the  organisms  seem  to  be  better 
able  to  induce  growth  processes  of  various  kinds  in  hydrozoa  than  in  higher 
organisms,  on  account  of  the  greater  plasticity  of  the  tissues  and  organs  in 
the  former.  Important  also  in  these  lower  forms  are  specific  distance  sub- 
stances, which,  acting  in  a  stimulating  or  an  inhibiting  manner,  are  able  to 
modify  the  structure  of  the  organism.  There  is  a  third  difference  between 
higher  organisms  and  hydrozoa  in  the  stabilization  of  the  equilibrium.  In 
higher  organisms  the  equilibria  depend  upon  the  local  interaction  of  tissues 
bearing  the  same  individuality  differential  and  they  are  therefore  essentially 
autogenous  in  character.  In  hydrozoa,  on  the  contrary,  parts  of  an  organism 
differing  in  the  character  of  their  individuality  differentials  may,  in  general, 
substitute  for  each  other;  incompatibilities,  with  resulting  disturbance  of  the 
formative  equilibria,  as  a  rule  become  manifest  only  if  distinct  differences  in 
species  differentials  exist  between  adjoining  tissues.  We  cannot  therefore  con- 
sider this  equilibrium  in  lower  forms  as  strictly  autogenous  in  character ;  it  is 
of  a  homoiogenous,  as  well  as  of  an  autogenous  nature. 

The  next  problem  to  be  considered  concerns  the  incompatibilities  and  dis- 
turbances of  equilibrium  which  may  take  place,  in  organisms  bearing  heterog- 
enous differentials,  after  a  primary  union  and  an  apparently  complete  forma- 
tive equilibrium  have  been  established.  These  changes  may  be  due  to  two 
different  causes:  (1)  The  primary  incompatibility  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials may  gradually  increase,  the  resulting  disturbance  of  the  equilibrium 
becoming  manifest  in  the  appearance  of  growth  processes  in  whole  organ- 
isms, which  otherwise  would  occur  only  in  isolated  parts;  or  (2)  the  original 
incompatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials  may  lead  to  a  primary  separa- 
tion of  the  adjoining  surfaces  of  the  heterogenous  parts  and  this  process  may 
be  followed  by  regenerative  changes.  We  believe  that  the*  first  interpretation 
is  the  more  probable  one  for  several  reasons:  (1)  In  certain  cases,  when  the 
union  between  adjoining  homoiogenous  pieces  was  apparently  perfect,  sec- 
ondarily a  separation  also  took  place.  Presumably  a  formative  change  at  the 
point  of  union  was  here  the  primary  process,  which  was  followed  by  separa- 
tion; (2)  the  separation  may  occur  in  some  classes  of  animals  not  exactly  at 
the  junction  of  the  two  surfaces,  but  at  a  neighboring  point.  This  indicates 
that  either  growth  processes  or  changes  of  a  degenerative  character  induced 
the  separation;  (3)  one  of  the  mechanisms  which  help  to  reestablish  a  stable 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  213 

equilibrium  may,  in  certain  instances,  in  hydroids  as  well  as  in  planarians, 
lead  to  the  separation  of  autogenous  parts  of  an  individual  which  have  been 
present  in  excess,  and  which  have  become  superfluous.  Here  it  is  evident  that 
regulatory,  integrative  mechanisms  of  an  unknown  nature  constitute  the 
primary  process,  and  this  is  followed  by  the  creation  of  a  wound  surface  as  a 
secondary  effect ;  the  latter  is,  therefore,  caused  by  the  action  of  these  integra- 
tive mechanisms ;  (4)  there  are  indications  that  the  mechanisms  mediating  the 
maintenance  of  an  individual  as  an  equilibrated  system  are  not  so  well  trans- 
mitted at  the  points  of  union  between  heterogenous  partners.  We  may  expect 
in  this  case  regulatory  processes  to  be  set  in  motion,  leading  to  attempts  at  new 
integrations  of  individuals,  with  the  resulting  separation  of  the  incompatible 
parts. 

We  have  seen  that  an  individual  hydrozoon  can  be  divided,  and  that  each 
part  can  give  origin  to  a  complete  organism.  The  degree  to  which  divisibility 
can  be  carried  depends  on  whether  such  particles  are  kept  in  their  normal 
medium  free  from  contact  with  other  individuals,  or  whether  they  are  trans- 
planted to  another  organism ;  if  transplanted,  the  antagonistic  influences  which 
the  host  may  exert  on  the  transplant  may  make  it  necessary  for  the  transplant 
to  have  a  minimum  optimal  size  before  it  is  able  to  restitute  the  whole.  We 
may  again  refer  in  this  connection  to  the  experiments  of  Issayew,  which 
have  shown  that  particles  from  different  individuals  may  be  joined  together 
in  such  a  way  that  they  form  a  whole  organism,  which  represents  the  mosaic 
of  a  chimaera.  In  this  case  each  particle  forms  part  of  one  whole,  at  the 
same  time  still  retaining  its  own  organismal  differential. 

In  hydrozoa,  as  has  been  noted,  the  tendency  exists  to  produce  single 
individuals  through  processes  of  coalescence,  as  well  as  of  splitting  leading 
to  supplementary  newformations.  Correspondingly,  stolons  of  hydroids 
belonging  to  the  same  colony,  and  even  stolons  from  adjoining  colonies, 
may  coalesce.  Also,  larvae  of  coelenterates  may  unite  among  themselves  and 
give  origin  to  a  new  colony,  or  they  may  join  a  part  of  an  already  existing 
colony  and  help  to  enlarge  it.  However,  the  mechanism  which  usually  leads 
to  colony  formation  is  that  of  budding.  The  question  may  be  raised  whether 
it  is  the  individual  polyp  or  the  colony  of  polyps  which  shall  be  considered 
as  the  bearer  of  the  individuality.  As  far  as  the  individuality  differentials 
are  concerned,  we  may  assume  that,  provided  they  exist  at  all,  they  are  the 
same  in  all  component  parts  of  a  colony.  Even  strange  colonies  belonging 
to  the  same  species  may  have  identical  individuality  differentials  if  they 
have  developed  from  buds  given  off  by  the  same  colony.  But  differences  in 
conditions  analogous  to  individuality  differentials  in  such  colonies  might  pos- 
sibly have  originated  under  the  influence  of  different  environmental  factors, 
which  were  able  to  modify  the  different  colonies ;  furthermore,  it  is  con- 
ceivable that  somatic  mutations  might  occur  and  lead  to  such  changes.  In 
higher  individuals,  differences  in  individuality  differentials  are,  as  a  rule, 
due  to  processes  which  take  place  during  the  formation  of  the  germ  cells 
and  during  fertilization.  We  may  therefore  expect  less  sharp  differences  in 
the  nature  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  organisms  propagating  by 


214  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

asexual  budding  or  having  the  power  to  restitute  the  whole  organism  from  a 
part,  than  in  those  propagating  only  by  sexual  mechanisms. 

If  we  consider  individuality  from  the  functional  point  of  view  and  attribute 
it  to  an  organism  able  to  live  and  function  independently  as  an  equilibrated 
mechanism,  to  which  different  parts  of  the  whole  contribute  in  a  distinctive 
manner,  then  we  can  attribute  individuality  to  the  single  hydrozoon  as  well 
as  to  a  colony,  in  which  certain  constituent  parts  may  exert  different  func- 
tions. However,  this  seems  to  be  a  problem  of  minor  importance,  because 
the  term  "individuality"  is  not  rigidly  defined ;  it  is  used  in  reference  to  or- 
ganisms merely  in  order  to  describe  certain  of  their  characteristics.  On  the 
other  hand,  it  may  be  worth  while  to  inquire  whether  a  connection  exists 
between  the  lack  of  a  manifestation  of  finer  differentials  in  these  primitive 
organisms  and  their  great  plasticity,  as  exemplified  in  their  readiness  to  form 
organs  under  the  influence  of  external  and  internal  environmental  factors 
and  propagate  asexually.  All  the  evidence  tends  to  the  conclusion  that  such 
a  connection  does  exist,  although  the  underlying  mechanism  is  not  yet  un- 
derstood. It  is  presumably  also  these  latter  characteristics  which  provide 
such  organisms  with  the  potentiality  of  immortal  life,  which  higher  organ- 
isms no  longer  possess;  in  the  higher  organisms  at  best,  certain  tissues  and 
cells  may  possess  such  a  potential  immortality. 

B.  Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Planarians 

In  many  respects  conditions  in  planarians  are  very  similar  to  those  found 
in  hydrozoa.  In  planarians  we  have  also  to  deal  with  a  very  plastic  living 
substance  in  which,  however,  again  a  definite  state  of  rudimentary  preformed 
differentiation  exists;  within  a  certain  range  it  is  possible  to  change  the  po- 
larity of  organs  and  thus  to  produce  heteromorphosis.  However,  there  are  in- 
dications that  in  proportion  to  the  greater  differentiation  which  exists  in 
planarians  external  factors  do  not  quite,  to  the  same  extent,  influence  organ 
formation  and  change  the  polarity  in  these  organisms  as  they  do  in  Hydra. 
In  order  to  evaluate  the  relation  of  organ  differentials  and  of  the  equilibrium 
between  the  parts  of  an  organism,  on  which  its  existence  as  an  individual  de- 
pends, to  organismal  differentials,  we  shall  also  in  this  instance  first  discuss 
very  briefly  the  factors  that  determine  polarity,  fixity  and  transformability 
of  parts  of  the  body  and  its  various  organ  systems. 

The  existence  of  a  predifferentiation  in  this  class  of  animals  is  indicated 
by  the  fact  that  the  anterior  pole  has  a  greater  head-forming  tendency  than 
the  posterior  pole.  Thus,  while  the  posterior  (aboral)  pole  has  the  power 
to  regenerate  a  head,  its  ability  to  do  so  is  less  than  that  of  the  anterior  (oral) 
pole.  Furthermore,  in  the  region  where  the  sex  organs  form,  proliferation 
in  the  host  tissue  may,  according  to  Gebhardt,  readily  lead  to  the  casting  off 
or  resorption  of  the  transplant.  The  existence  of  a  rudimentary  differentia- 
tion comes  out  also  in  the  specific  inhibition  in  organ  formation;  thus,  the 
proximity  of  a  head  inhibits  head  formation  (Rand,  Goldsmith)  and  that  of 
a  tail  inhibits  tail  formation  (Rand).  It  is  also  indicated  by  the  fact  that  if 
Planaria  is  split  lengthwise  into  halves,  each  half  may  regenerate  into  a 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  215 

complete  organism.  In  the  latter  case  there  must  be  a  local  factor  active,  which 
causes  the  various  organs  to  reproduce  each  its  own  kind,  although  even  under 
these  conditions  inducting  factors  acting  in  the  direction  of  the  long  axis  may 
play  a  certain  part.  Likewise  the  fact  observed  by  Child,  that  even  in  the 
absence  of  a  head  an  isolated  piece  of  Planaria  is  able  to  regenerate  all  parts 
representing  the  levels  posterior  to  its  situation  in  the  organism,  points  to  the 
existence  of  a  predifferentiation  in  these  parts,  and  there  are  some  indications 
that  it  is  the  nervous  system  which  plays,  here,  an  important  role  in  deter- 
mining the  rudimentary  differentiation. 

In  Planaria,  as  in  a  similar  manner  in  hydrozoa,  it  is  possible  to  demon- 
strate the  existence  of  organizers.  In  both  classes  of  organisms  it  is  especially 
the  most  differentiated  organ  area,  the  anterior  pole  or  head,  which  not  only 
dominates  the  structure  of  the  organism,  but  may  also  act  as  organizer  (Child, 
Goetsch,  Santos).  Furthermore,  both  classes  show  the  same  types  of  induc- 
tion, and  the  inducting  organ  gives  origin  to  its  own  kind  of  organ  in  the 
material  acted  upon;  in  hydrozoa  a  transplanted  head  gives  rise  to  a  new 
head,  and  in  Planaria,  according  to  Gebhardt,  the  eyes  of  the  host  may  induce 
eye  formation  in  a  bud  from  the  posterior  part,  which  has  been  transplanted 
into  the  head  region.  In  addition,  a  second  type  of  induction  has  been  estab- 
lished in  Planaria,  especially  by  Morettj,  Goetsch  and  Santos.  Goetsch  ob- 
served that  a  transplanted  head  can  induce  in  the  host  a  reorganization,  which 
leads  to  the  development  of  a  postcephalic  region.  Santos  grafted  a  piece  from 
the  ganglion  region  of  Planaria  into  the  prepharyngeal  levels  of  the  host.  If 
the  transplant  was  of  a  sufficient  size,  it  gave  rise  to  a  head  and  determined 
in  the  host  a  postcephalic  outgrowth.  If  implanted  into  postpharyngeal  levels 
of  the  host,  the  transplant  not  only  determined  postcephalic  outgrowth  in  the 
host,  but,  besides,  it  caused  a  further  reorganization,  with  the  development 
of  a  pharynx  and  postpharyngeal  region.  But  the  reorganizing  influence  of 
the  grafted  piece  extended  in  the  host  also  in  an  anterior  direction  and  in 
this  way  it  could  determine  a  reversal  of  the  polarity.  However,  the  host. too 
may  exert  an  influence  on  the  grafted  part.  This  was  indicated  by  the  fact 
that  when  the  union  between  host  and  transplant  was  complete,  the  host 
inhibited  the  perfect  development  of  a  head  from  the  graft,  while  an  incom- 
plete union  gave  the  transplant  a  chance  to  develop  in  accordance  with  its 
own  potentialities. 

As  Rand  has  found,  the  inhibiting  influence  which  a  graft  exerts  on  a 
wound,  in  a  more  or  less  specialized  region  in  the  host,  varies  somehow  in 
an  inverse  relation  to  the  distance  of  the  inhibiting  material  from  the  wound 
surface.  This  suggests  that  we  may  have  to  deal  with  a  diffusible  contact 
substance,  which  decreases  in  concentration  with  the  distance  between  graft 
and  wound.  Besides  such  inhibiting  effects,  we  have  then  to  deal  here,  as  in 
coelenterates,  with  two  kinds  of  actions.  One  leads  to  the  reproduction  of  the 
same  organ  as  that  which  acts  as  an  organizer  and  the  second  represents  a 
complementary,  integrative  mechanism,  which  causes  the  completion  of  a 
whole  organism  from  a  part. 

We  may  assume  that  the  inducting  action  of  the  transplanted  head  region 


216  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  Moretti,  Goetsch  and  Santos  observed,  is  effective  also  in  the  normal 
organism  and  here  helps  to  maintain  its  polarity,  a  conception  emphasized 
especially  by  Child  in  his  axial  gradient  theory.  There  are  two  mechanisms 
through  which  such  an  effect  could  be  accomplished:  (1)  Through  contact 
action  the  dominant,  most  differentiated  part  could  transmit  an  inductive 
effect  to  the  adjoining  posterior  part  and  this  part  in  sequence  could  exert 
a  similar  inductive  effect  on  the  nearest  adjoining  region  in  the  antero- 
posterior direction ;  in  this  way  a  distance  action  could  be  brought  about,  in 
which  the  inductive  effect  becomes  gradually  weaker;  or  (2)  substances  could 
be  produced  by  the  dominant  part,  from  which  they  pass  to  neighboring  and 
to  distant  regions  in  gradually  decreasing  concentration.  But  there  is  reason 
for  assuming  that  such  actions  do  not  affect  an  indifferent  material,  but  one 
which,  while  plastic  within  a  definite  range,  still  possesses  a  certain  pre- 
differentiation  which  varies  in  different  parts  in  fixity. 

It  is  possible  that  parts,  other  than  the  dominant  part,  also  exert  an  induc- 
tive distance  effect.  Thus  L.  V.  Morgan  has  shown  that  when  a  head  is  cut 
off  in  Planaria  and  a  small  piece  is  placed  on  the  wound  in  an  inverted  direc- 
tion, so  that  the  oral  pole  of  the  graft  joins  the  oral  pole  of  the  host,  a  distance 
action  is  exerted  by  the  larger  piece,  representing  the  host,  which  causes 
the  aboral  pole  of  the  transplant  to  form  a  head.  Such  an  interpretation  of 
the  experimental  findings  would  apply  if  we  assume  that  the  head  formation 
in  the  transplant  was  not  the  result  of  unknown  external  factors,  but  was 
caused  by  an  integrative  type  of  induction. 

As  in  the  case  of  hydroids,  so  also  in  planarians,  the  mechanisms  under- 
lying the  change  of  abnormal  structures  to  a  normal  organism  may  lead  to 
the  absorption  of  excess  organs.  In  other  cases  the  mechanism  underlying 
integration  may  lead  to  a  duplication  of  an  organism,  as  when  two  complete 
organisms  form  following  the  production  of  two  heads  and  two  tails  through 
partial  lengthwise  incisions  in  the  anterior  and  posterior  parts. 

According  to  Goetsch,  a  transformation  of  one  organ  into  another,  a  coa- 
lescence of  two  organs,  or  a  newformation  of  an  organ,  takes  place  by  means 
of  an  intermediate  stage,  in  which,  at  first,  under  the  influence  of  various 
stimuli,  an  indifferent  tissue  develops,  which  secondarily  undergoes  the 
specific  differentiation.  Fully  differentiated  organs  cannot  be  directly  trans- 
formed. The  less  marked  the  differentiation  is  in  a  certain  organism,  the  less 
fargoing  need  be  the  preliminary  changes,  as  well  as  the  later  differentiations, 
which  make  possible  the  transformation  of  one  organ  into  a  different  one. 
In  hydroids  the  regeneration  following  removal  of  a  part  of  an  organism 
can  be  prevented  by  grafting  another  piece  of  a  hydroid  on  the  cut  surface. 
In  the  same  way  it  is  possible  to  prevent  regenerative  action  also  in  Planaria. 

The  facts  to  which  we  have  referred  indicate  that  the  normal  Planaria 
represents  an  equilibrated  system  in  which  there  are  various  mechanisms  of 
induction  acting  on  the  neighboring  tissue,  as  well  as  at  a  distance.  It  is  the 
removal  of  these  influences,  as  well  as  the  direct  effect  of  a  new  medium 
surrounding  the  injured  tissue  and  the  altered  mechanical  conditions  in  the 


COELENTERATES  AND  PLANARIANS  217 

latter,  which  have  to  be  considered  as  possible  factors  responsible  for  the 
regenerative  and  integrative  changes  setting  in  after  an  injury. 

Homoiogenous  tissues  can  bring  about  such  an  equilibration,  whereas  after 
transplantation  of  pieces  belonging  to  a  different  species  or  genus,  this  result 
is  only  temporary  and  after  some  time  regenerative,  integrative  activity  sets 
in  at  the  point  of  union,  so  that,  as  Goetsch  observed,  the  two  parts  of  two 
organisms  previously  joined  together  separate  again.  This  fact  makes  it  rea- 
sonable to  assume  that  contact  substances  whose  organismal  differentials  are 
not  too  distant  are  needed  for  equilibration.  Also,  the  inductive  action,  which 
a  transplant  exerts  on  the  mesenchymatous  tissue  of  the  host,  takes  place, 
according  to  Gebhardt,  only  if  transplant  and  host  are  homoiogenous ;  if  the 
adjoining  tissues  carry  heterodifferentials  no  induction  is  noted.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  organizing  action  of  ganglionic  material,  studied  by  Santos,  is 
effective  not  only  when  both  graft  and  host  belong  to  the  same  species,  but 
also  when  they  belong  to  different  species;  when  the  graft  belongs,  for  in- 
stance, to  Planaria  dorotocephala  and  the  host  to  Planaria  maculata,  or  vice 
versa. 

As  in  hydroids,  so  also  in  planarians  homoiotransplantations  succeed  readily 
and  distinct  differences  between  the  effects  of  auto-  and  of  homoiotransplan- 
tation  have  not  been  established;  we  have  therefore  no  indications  of  the 
existence  of  distinctive  homoiodifferentials,  though  the  existence  of  hetero- 
differentials has  been  definitely  demonstrated.  As  stated,  in  certain  favorable 
cases  heterotransplants  act  like  homoiotransplants ;  but  it  seems,  as  a  rule, 
that  contact  and  distance  mechanisms  active  at  the  point  of  union  between 
two  homoiogenous  pieces  are  ineffective  in  heterogenous  combinations.  Hetero- 
transplantation of  small  pieces  seems  not  to  lead  to  a  complete  union  of  the 
graft  with  the  surrounding  host  tissue. 

So  far  as  the  plasticity  of  organs  and  the  lack  of  manifestation  of  finer 
organismal  differentials  are  concerned,  there  is  thus  a  fargoing  likeness  in 
hydroids  and  planarians,  and  the  same  general  conclusions  apply  in  these  two 
groups  of  animals  as  to  the  similarity  of  the  mechanisms  which  maintain  the 
intraorganismal  equilibrium  and  the  absence  of  distinctions  between  autog- 
enous and  homoiogenous  tissues  in  this  equilibrium.  Various  types  of  organ- 
izer and  regenerative,  integrative  influences  play  a  role  in  determining  the 
mutual  relations  of  organs  and  tissues  in  these  lower  organisms,  all  tending 
to  reestablish  the  original  equilibrium  when  it  is  disturbed.  It  is  this  autog- 
enous equilibrium,  as  we  have  studied  it  in  higher  organisms  and  as  it  exists 
in  a  wider  sense  also  in  these  primitive  organisms,  which  determines  the 
maintenance  of  individuality.  However,  here  the  type  of  interactions  between 
organs  and  tissues  which  helps  to  sustain  the  normal  equilibrium,  or  to  re- 
establish a  disturbed  equilibrium,  is  in  some  respects  more  accessible  to 
analysis  than  are  the  corresponding  mechanisms  in  the  higher  organisms.  In 
the  latter,  accompanying  the  greater  refinement  in  individuality,  the  means  of 
restoring  an  unbalanced  equilibrium,  in  the  sense  in  which  it  can  be  accom- 
plished in  these  very  primitive  organisms,  are  lacking. 


Chapter  2 

Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Higher 
Invertebrates  and  in  Amphibia 

In  this  chapter  we  shall  analyze  individuality  first  in  lumbricidae,  which 
represent  a  transitional  form  between  the  very  primitive  invertebrates, 
already  discussed,  and  the  more  differentiated  echinoderms  and  arthro- 
pods. These  latter  will  then  be  considered,  and  lastly,  amphibia,  as  representing 
a  less  highly  developed  type  of  vertebrate. 

A.  Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Annelids 

The  lumbricidae  differ  from  the  planarians  in  a  considerably  greater  fixity 
of  their  organs  and  presumably  in  a  correspondingly  greater  specificity  and 
fixity  of  the  substances  on  which  the  differences  between  organs  depend 
(organ  differentials).  While  the  organs  have  not  yet  become  entirely  rigid, 
still  the  differentiation  between  head  and  tail  parts  is  more  fixed  than  in 
planarians.  In  accordance  with  this  change  in  the  organs  we  find  a  greater 
differentiation  in  the  organismal  differentials,  as  is  indicated  in  the  trans- 
plantation experiments  on  lumbricidae  which  have  been  carried  out  especially 
by  Korschelt  and  his  associates,  Joest,  Rutloff,  Leypoldt,  Harms,  Rabes,  and 
more  recently  by  Mutscheller.  The  earlier  of  these  experiments  antedated  the 
majority  of  the  investigations  on  coelenterates  and  planarians.  At  that  time 
attention  was  focused  on  problems  which  have  since  receded  into  the  back- 
ground. Thus  the  problem  as  to  the  significance  of  a  reversion  of  polarity  in 
transplantation,  which  had  been  introduced  largely  through  the  investigations 
of  Voechting  in  plants,  dominated  research  to  a  large  extent  at  this  earlier 
period,  and  even  much  later  we  find  Schoene  studying  polarity  in  transplan- 
tation of  vertebrate  skin. 

As  to  polarity,  two  questions  might  be  asked:  (1)  Is  there  inherent  in 
these  organisms  an  orientation  of  their  constituent  parts  comparable  to  the 
organization  of  a  magnet,  and  is  it  therefore  necessary  that  the  transplant  be 
inserted  into  the  host  in  a  definite  direction  if  transplant  and  host  are  to  be 
mutually  compatible?  As  far  as  is  known,  this  does  not  hold  good  in  the 
animal  series.  (2)  Do  the  actions  of  contact  substances  and  of  distant  sub- 
stances exert  different  influences  on  regenerative  processes,  and  in  particular 
on  wound  healing,  in  a  normal  and  a  reversed  orientation  of  the  transplanted 
piece?  This  may  be  the  case  in  the  more  primitive  organisms,  where  regenera- 
tive processes  of  an  integrative  character  play  a  much  greater  role  than  in 
the  higher  organisms,  and  where  the  organ  differentials  are  not  yet  so  rigid 
as  to  prevent  heteromorphosis.  However,  in  some  instances  certain  subsidiary 
factors  may  differ  at  the  two  poles  of  a  transplant  and  then  such  factors  may 
play  a  role  also  in  higher  organisms. 

218 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  219 

A  second  problem  prominent  in  the  earlier  experiments  concerned  the 
possibility  of  changing  species  characters  of  parts  of  organisms  by  means  of 
heterotransplantation.  Is  the  host  able  to  impress  his  own  organismal  differ- 
ential on  the  transplant?  We  now  know  that  species,  as  well  as  individuality 
differentials  are  gene  derivatives  and  are  therefore  essentially  fixed,  although 
their  manifestations  may  be  modifiable  within  certain  limits. 

If  we  now  consider  the  investigations  in  lumbricidae  which  have  a  bearing 
on  the  problems  with  which  we  are  especially  concerned,  namely,  the  evolu- 
tion of  the  organismal  differentials  and  their  relation  to  the  degree  of  plasticity 
of  the  organism  in  its  response  to  environmental  changes,  it  has  been  shown 
that,  as  a  general  rule,  homoiotransplantation  of  pieces  which  are  viable 
succeeds  readily,  host  and  transplant  remaining  permanently  united.  Follow- 
ing transplantation,  a  union  of  the  corresponding  organs,  such  as  integument, 
vessels,  intestines  and  nerve  strands,  takes  place,  and  movements  as  well  as 
mitotic  divisions  in  the  tissues  play  a  role  in  this  process ;  thus  one  harmonious 
individual  is  produced  in  which  the  organ  systems  derived  from  different 
individuals  function  well,  and  it  is  only  by  means  of  differences  in  pigmen- 
tation that  the  homoiogenous  constituents  of  such  individuals  can,  in  some 
cases,  be  distinguished.  It  seems  that  especially  the  union  of  the  nerves  of  the 
two  partners  is  important  in  homoio-  as  well  as  in  autotransplantation ;  if 
the  nerves  do  not  properly  unite,  then  regeneration  may  occur  at  the  point 
of  junction  of  the  pieces  and  a  new  head  may  grow  out,  or  the  partners 
separate,  even  if  outwardly  the  union  between  the  partners  has  been  perfect. 
Apparently  the  nerves  play,  here,  an  important  part  in  determining  regenera- 
tion, and  we  may  recall  the  fact  that  also  in  Planaria  Santos  found  indica- 
tions that  the  cephalic  ganglia  may  determine  head  formation.  It  is  apparently 
the  contact  with  corresponding  living  nerve  tissue  which  keeps  the  nerves  in 
a  quiescent  state,  preventing  their  regenerative  outgrowth  and  thus  their 
stimulating  effect  on  the  growth  of  other  surrounding  tissues.  However,  the 
evidence  as  to  the  significance  of  nerve  tissue  in  regenerative  and  integrative 
growth  processes,  especially  in  cells  in  planarians,  is  still  contradictory,  and 
in  lumbricidae  even  a  defect  in  the  union  of  the  body  walls  of  the  two  pieces 
may  lead  to  a  newformation  of  a  head,  irrespective  of  the  presence  of  nerve 
fibers. 

While,  then,  in  this  class  of  animals  there  are  apparently  no  differences 
between  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation,  yet  by  means  of  certain  experi- 
mental procedures  it  is  possible  to  bring  out  such  differences ;  thus,  if  three 
pieces  are  joined  together,  the  middle  piece  being  inserted  in  an  inverse 
direction,  this  combination  remains  alive  permanently  only  in  autotransplan- 
tations,  while  in  homoiotransplantations  some  difficulties  appear.  But,  there 
remains  the  possibility  that  the  superiority  of  autotransplantation  may  be  due 
to  the  fact  that  in  this  instance  the  pieces  fit  together  better  mechanically  and 
that  individuality  differentials  are  not  concerned  in  this  result.  Similar  obser- 
vations were  made  in  Hydra  by  H.  D.  King  in  joining  together  more  than 
two  homoiogenous  pieces. 

In  lumbricidae,  the  differentiation  of  the  organism  is   farther  advanced 


220  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

than  in  planarians  and  the  relative  importance  of  inductive  factors,  acting 
by  means  of  distance  substances  given  off  by  transplanted  pieces,  is  dimin- 
ished as  compared  with  the  more  primitive  organisms,  although  it  is  not  yet 
entirely  lost.  Likewise,  the  action  of  external  environmental  factors  on  organ 
formation  is  not  evident  in  lumbricidae  in  the  sense  in  which  it  exists  in  the 
case  of  hydroids.  Korschelt  and  Mutscheller  have  shown  that  the  ability  to 
form  a  head  is  limited  to  the  most  anterior  part  of  the  body,  and  that  the 
farther  back  the  segments  are,  the  greater  is  their  tendency  to  form  a  tail. 
The  gradient  in  organization  in  Lumbricus  is  thus  quite  definite.  If  one 
transplants  to  the  anterior  pole  of  an  animal,  whose  head  has  been  cut  off, 
a  posterior  part  (tail)  of  a  worm  in  the  inverse  direction  and  then  cuts  off 
the  end  segments  of  the  transplanted  tail,  the  inductive  action  of  the  large 
posterior  piece,  which  would  tend  to  call  forth  the  production  of  a  hetero- 
morphic  head  at  the  end  of  the  graft,  cannot  overcome  the  strong  organ- 
specialization  of  the  tail  segments  which  have  the  inherent  tendency  to  produce 
a  tail.  But  if  a  still  larger  number  of  the  posterior  segments  of  the  tail  piece 
are  removed  before  a  remaining  piece  of  the  tail  is  grafted  inversely  on  the 
anterior  cut  surface  of  the  host,  then  the  inductive,  integrative  action  of  the 
larger  partner  can  overcome  the  less  specialized  organ  differentials  which 
exist  in  the  graft,  at  a  somewhat  greater  distance  from  the  posterior  end  of 
the  animal,  and  formation  of  a  head  may  take  place  at  the  free  cut  surface. 
There  exists,  thus,  a  competitive  struggle  between  the  inductive  action  of 
substances  or  mechanisms,  which  act  from  a  distance  and  which  may  tend  to 
produce  a  heteromorphosis,  and  the  fixity  of  the  organ  differentials  in  the 
transplant,  which,  when  unopposed,  would  lead  to  the  reproduction  of  a  tail 
organ.  In  this  struggle  the  larger  partner  has  an  advantage  over  the  smaller, 
a  condition  applying  similarly  in  hydroids  and  in  planarians.  A  corresponding 
experiment  which  L.  V.  Morgan  carried  out  in  Planaria,  leading  to  the 
heteromorphic  development  of  a  head  at  an  aboral  cut  surface  grafted  in- 
versely on  the  anterior  cut  surface  of  a  larger  piece,  succeeded  more  readily, 
because  in  planarians  the  organ  differentials  are  not  yet  fixed  to  the  same 
degree  as  in  lumbricidae.  The  more  pronounced  differentiation  of  organs  in 
these  latter  animals  diminishes  the  plasticity  of  the  organism  and  the  ready 
transformation  of  polar  organs,  as  well  as  the  importance  of  integrative 
induction. 

More  recent  experiments  of  Julian  Huxley  and  Gross  with  the  polychaete 
worm,  Sabella,  indicate  that  the  making  of  a  wound  as  such  may  exert  a 
stimulus  which  acts  not  only  locally  in  an  area  adjoining  the  wound,  but 
which  may  also  act  at  a  distance  and  influence  the  character  of  the  structural 
changes  which  shall  take  place.  Thus  the  cutting  off  of  a  regenerated  head 
may  not  only  influence  a  transformation  of  abdominal  segments  into  thoracic 
segments  near  the  head  pole  of  the  animal,  but  it  may  also  cause,  under 
certain  conditions,  a  further  transformation  of  regenerating  abdominal  seg- 
ments situated  at  the  tail  pole  of  the  animal  into  thoracic  segments.  Also, 
small  lateral  wounds  may  influence  the  changes  which  take  place  in  adjoining, 
and  even  in  more  distantly  situated  segments ;  these  changes  may  consist  either 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  221 

in  a  loss  of  certain  structures,  followed  by  the  formation  of  new  structures, 
or,  in  some  instances,  in  the  direct  transformation  of  organs,  without  the 
previous  loss  of  other  structures.  These  observations  point  to  the  existence 
of  a  somewhat  furthergoing  plasticity  in  the  structure  of  annelids,  which 
permits  the  transformation  of  regenerating  abdominal  segments  into  segments 
with  the  character  of  thoracic  segments.  On  the  other  hand,  experimentally 
produced  duplications  of  considerable  size  may  persist  unchanged  under 
conditions  in  which,  in  the  more  primitive  and  plastic  organisms,  various 
regulative  mechanisms  would  have  eventuated  in  the  formation  of  normal 
individuals.  As  far  as  the  organismal  differentials  are  concerned,  homoioge- 
nous  combinations  are  possible  in  lumbricidae,  without  leading  to  disharmonies 
which,  as  we  have  seen,  take  place  in  parabiotic  partners  in  mammals,  owing 
to  the  greater  refinement  of  organismal  differentials  in  the  latter. 

We  see,  then,  that  in  general  the  differentiation  and  fixity  of  the  organism 
is  much  more  advanced  in  lumbricidae  than  in  hydroids  and  planarians ; 
correspondingly,  the  inductive  distant  action  has  decreased  in  effectiveness 
in  the  former,  and  it  is  likewise  due  to  their  relative  fixity  in  organization 
that  an  organizer  action,  in  which  a  differentiated  part  grafted  on  a  host 
induces  here  the  development  of  its  own  kind  of  an  organ,  seems  not  to  have 
been  observed  in  this  class  of  animals.  Such  an  organizer  would  probably  be 
unable  to  act  effectively  with  this  less  plastic  material.  On  the  other  hand, 
there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  second  kind  of  inductive  action  leading 
to  integrative  regeneration  is  still,  though  to  a  much  diminished  extent,  potent 
even  in  lumbricidae. 

Heterotransplantation  succeeds  in  lumbricidae  with  much  greater  difficulty 
than  homoiotransplantation.  In  the  large  majority  of  cases  heterogenous 
pieces  remain  united  only  for  a  few  days,  then  separate  or  degenerate.  In 
other  cases  there  may  be  a  better  union  by  means  of  scar  tissue  covered  by 
epithelium ;  secondarily,  muscle,  nerves  and  vessels  may  grow  through  it  and 
into  the  heterogenous  tissue.  Thus  also  in  heterotransplantation  blood  vessels 
as  well  as  other  organs  may  unite  with  the  corresponding  organs  of  the  partner 
and  a  common  circulation  be  established.  But  even  under  these  conditions 
while  there  is,  at  first,  an  apparently  perfect  union  of  the  two  heterogenous 
pieces,  a  separation  may  take  place  subsequently  and  as  late  as  after  five 
weeks.  As  a  result  of  changes  occurring  at  or  near  the  place  of  union,  the 
latter  becomes  looser  and  a  mere  mechanical  pull  may  readily  separate  the 
two  partners.  However,  in  one  instance  Korschelt  succeeded  in  keeping  a 
combination  of  Lumbricus  rubellus  and  Allophora  terrestris  alive  for  a  period 
of  eight  to  nine  months.  In  pieces  thus  temporarily  united,  in  which  a  smaller 
heterogenous  piece  has  been  grafted  in  an  inverse  direction  on  a  larger  host 
whose  head  has  been  cut  off,  the  host  may  induce  the  beginning  formation 
of  a  heteromorphic  head  in  the  smaller  anteriorly  situated  graft;  but  usually 
at  the  point  of  union  a  new  head  develops  and  then  the  pieces  separate.  The 
heterogenous  contact  substances,  or,  more  generally  expressed,  contact 
mechanisms,  which  are  active  at  the  cut  surfaces  do  not  keep  the  adjoining 
parts  in  an  equilibrated,  quiescent  state  and  can  not  therefore  prevent  regen- 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

eration.  The  attachment  of  a  heterotransplant  to  the  adjoining  host  tissue  is 
from  the  beginning  less  complete  than  it  would  be  in  case  of  homoiotrans- 
plantation  and  gradually  degenerative  changes  occur  in  the  transplant. 

Similar  are  the  results  if,  instead  of  larger  heterogenous  transplants,  small 
pieces  are  grafted  on  defects  in  larger  pieces.  If  small  pieces  of  skin  together 
with  the  adjoining  muscle  are  thus  heterotransplanted  into  wounds  in  lum- 
bricidae,  they  remain  as  a  rule  preserved  only  for  a  certain  time;  but  in 
exceptional  cases  the  transplant  may  maintain  itself  apparently  without  change 
for  as  long  as  nine  months.  Leypoldt  used  in  experiments  of  this  nature, 
regenerating,  heterogenous  skin  which  was  not  yet  fully  developed;  but  in 
most  instances  it  was  either  soon  discarded  or  it  was  gradually  absorbed 
through  the  activity  of  the  adjoining  tissue  of  the  host.  Even  after  the  pieces 
had  healed  in,  in  an  apparently  perfect  condition,  subsequently  degenerative 
changes  took  place  in  the  transplants  and  led  to  their  gradual  absorption.  On 
the  other  hand,  homoiogenous  pieces  of  skin  usually  were  much  more  readily 
preserved  for  a  long  period  of  time,  or  even  permanently.  When  ovaries  were 
heterotransplanted,  in  a  small  minority  of  cases  the  grafts  remained  in  good 
condition  as  long  as  for  three  months  or  even  for  one  year,  provided  the 
species  were  nearly  related;  but  if  they  were  farther  distant,  the  transplants 
were  injured  and  were  much  more  quickly  absorbed.  It  is  of  interest  that  it 
was  also  possible  to  obtain  heterofertilization  of  the  eggs  which  developed 
in  the  heterotransplanted  ovaries.  The  F1  generation  of  such  hybrids  possessed 
characteristics  of  both  parents,  but  they  were  sterile  and  soon  died. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  heterotransplantation  may  succeed,  although 
usually  with  some  difficulty,  in  lumbricidae  as  well  as  in  the  more  primitive 
hydroids  and  planarians,  provided  the  species  used  are  nearly  related ;  other- 
wise the  incompatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials  leads  to  an  early 
separation  or  destruction  of  the  transplant. 

Somewhat  similar  are  the  factors  which  are  active  in  transplantation  in  the 
oligochaeta  Criodilus,  as  we  may  conclude  from  the  experiments  of  Tiara. 
In  this  organism  certain  kinds  of  heterotransplantation  succeed,  while  others 
do  not.  We  have  here,  likewise,  a  limited  degree  of  organ  differentiation,  the 
anterior  segment  having  the  tendency  to  form  a  head,  the  posterior  segment 
a  tail ;  but  as  in  lumbricidae,  heteromorphosis  may  occur  as  a  result  of  certain 
mechanisms  acting  in  such  a  way  as  to  force  upon  a  smaller  piece,  from  a 
distance,  the  formation  of  an  organ  contrary  to  the  rudimentary  differentiation 
existing  in  the  smaller  piece.  Thus  a  larger  sized  partner  may  gain  dominance 
over  a  smaller  one. 

In  this  case  also,  the  nervous  system  may  perhaps  determine  whether  or 
not  a  head  formation  shall  take  place  at  the  point  of  union  between  two 
pieces.  A  head  forms  at  the  anterior  cut  surface  if  the  nerve  strands  of  the 
partners  do  not  unite.  Under  these  conditions  the  regenerative  activity  of  the 
cut  nerve  seems  to  furnish  the  stimulus  for  a  head  formation.  That  in  these 
organisms  a  certain  plasticity  of  organ  formation  still  exists  follows  also 
from  the  fact  that  the  epidermis  of  the  adult  animal  has  the  power  to  regen- 
erate the  nervous  system. 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  223 

We  may  conclude  from  the  principal  facts  relating  to  organ  and  organ- 
ismal  differentials  in  the  relatively  primitive  classes  which  we  have  considered 
so  far,  that  while  with  the  progress  in  phylogenetic  development  the  differen- 
tiation of  the  organs  advances,  their  plasticity  decreases  and,  correspondingly, 
the  effectiveness  of  the  inductive  processes  leading  to  the  reestablishment  of 
normal  individuals  is  diminished ;  however,  there  is  not  a  proportional  advance 
noticeable  in  the  differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials,  or  at  least  in 
their  manifestation.  In  all  these  classes  heterotransplantation  between  nearly 
related  species  seems  to  succeed,  although  as  a  rule  with  greater  difficulty  than 
between  homoiogenous  organisms,  while  between  farther  distant  species  it 
does  not  succeed.  But,  it  is  possible  that  the  greater  regenerative  power  of  the 
hydroids  and  also  of  the  planarians,  as  compared  with  that  possessed  by 
lumbricidae, — a  regenerative  power  which  leads  to  integration  of  defective 
organisms, — may  serve  to  cover  up  the  fact  that  they  actually  do  possess  less 
differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials  than  the  lumbricidae  and  less 
sensitiveness  to  strange  differentials.  The  greater  regenerative  power  of  the 
hydroids  may  lead  to  a  more  ready  outgrowth  from  a  cut  surface  and  to 
subsequent  separation  of  the  partners  in  case  the  organismal  differentials 
are  not  quite  compatible,  and  this  condition  may  make  it  appear  as  though  the 
reactions  against  differences  in  organismal  differentials  were  more  severe  in 
the  more  primitive  organisms  than  they  actually  are. 

B.  Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Arthropods  and  Echinoderms 

In  general,  the  regenerative  power  is  very  limited  in  insects  and  moths, 
especially  after  metamorphosis  has  taken  place,  and  this  condition  interferes 
with  transplantability  to  a  certain  extent.  It  also  seems  to  be  associated  with 
an  increase  in  the  rigidity  of  organization. 

In  moths,  experiments  in  transplantation  were  carried  out  by  Crampton 
as  early  as  1899.  At  that  time,  as  we  stated  in  reference  to  experiments  in 
lumbricidae,  the  problems  of  polarity  and  of  the  preservation  of  the  species 
characters  in  transplant  and  host  were  prominent;  also,  the  question  as  to 
the  behavior  of  the  various  organs  of  host  and  transplant  to  each  other  had 
been  introduced  through  the  experiments  of  Born  with  embryos  of  amphibia. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  problem  as  to  the  effects  of  variations  in  relationship 
between  the  partners,  or  between  donor  and  host,  on  transplantation  played 
an  unimportant  role  at  that  time.  In  Crampton's  experiments  parts  of  pupae 
were  used ;  on  account  of  their  low  regenerative  power  only  the  skins  or  other 
organs  situated  near  the  surface,  but  not  the  internal  organs,  united  after 
transplantation,  and  positive  results  were  obtained  therefore  only  in  a  minority 
of  cases.  While  homoiotransplantation  of  small  pieces  of  tissue  was  successful 
in  a  number  of  instances,  heterotransplantation  succeeded  not  at  all,  or  at 
best  only  exceptionally.  However,  if  instead  of  grafting  small  pieces  of  tissue, 
whole  segments  of  the  animals  were  transplanted,  a  procedure  which  does 
not  exactly  correspond  to  parabiosis  because  of  the  inability  of  the  isolated 
segments  to  lead  an  independent  existence,  both  homoio-  and  heterotrans- 
plantation succeeded,  but  the  former  apparently  somewhat  better  than  the 


224  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

latter.  In  all  probability  we  have  therefore  in  these  cases  to  deal  with  a  result 
similar  to  that  found  in  lumbricidae ;  heterotransplantation  may  succeed,  yet 
heterodifferentials  do  exist  and  exert  a  certain  influence,  on  the  fate  of  the 
transplants.  On  the  other  hand,  we  must  always  consider  the  possibility  that 
whenever  negative  results  were  obtained  in  heterotransplantations,  this  may 
have  been  due  not  to  a  primary  incompatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials, 
but  to  secondary  factors,  as  for  instance,  to  differences  in  the  size  of  the 
pieces  to  be  united  and  to  similar  more  or  less  accidental  conditions. 

The  subsequent  experiments  of  Meisenheimer  also  make  it  probable  that 
heterodifferentials  may  play  a  role  in  these  transplantations.  In  Lymantria 
this  investigator  succeeded  in. transplanting  ovaries  into  individuals  of  the 
same,  as  well  as  of  different  species,  provided  the  latter  were  nearly  related. 
We  might  then  conclude  that  heterodifferentials  become  manifest  only  in  the 
case  of  more  distant  species,  either  because  in  more  nearly  related  species  the 
less  marked  differences  in  genetic  constitution  do  not  lead  to  the  production 
of  antagonistic  mechanisms  to  the  same  extent  as  greater  differences,  or  be- 
cause the  sensitiveness  and  reactivity  to  the  injurious  action  of  the  correspond- 
ing heterodifferentials  are  less  pronounced  in  these  lower  forms  than  in 
higher  organisms.  However,  the  experiments  of  Kopec,  which  followed  those 
of  Meisenheimer,  indicate  that  heterodifferentials  are  well  developed  in 
moths;  he  found  that,  while  homoiotransplantation  of  sex  glands  succeeds, 
heterotransplantation  does  not.  Of  interest  is  also  his  observation  that  differ- 
ent tissues  show  different  degrees  of  resistance  to  the  manifestation  of 
heterodifferentials ;  thus  the  germ  cells  are  the  most  sensitive ;  these  die  earliest 
after  heterotransplantation,  while  transplanted  connective  tissue  grows  at  first 
and  is  only  secondarily  destroyed.  Furthermore,  he  also  notes  that  the  destruc- 
tion of  the  transplants  takes  place  the  more  rapidly,  the  more  distant  the 
heterogenous  species  are  from  each  other.  It  seems,  then,  that  in  these  cases 
we  have  to  deal  with  a  direct  injurious  action  of  heterotoxins ;  but  in  addition 
cellular  mechanisms  participate  in  these  processes,  inasmuch  as  phagocytic 
cells  of  the  host  may  destroy  isolated  heterogenous  germ  cells. 

In  insects,  according  to  E.  Ries,  it  is  possible  to  transplant  larval  fat  tissue 
which  has  been  transformed  into  a  mycetoma,  into  larvae  of  different  orders. 
Accordingly,  if  transplanted  from  Periplaneta  into  the  peritoneal  cavity  of 
Tenebrio,  or  from  Psylla  to  Tenebrio,  the  grafted  fat  tissue  remains  alive 
throughout  the  life  of  the  larva;  however,  as  a  result  of  the  strangeness  of 
the  transplant,  lymphocytes  soon  begin  to  collect  around  it.  The  transplanted 
tissue  can  even  survive  the  metamorphosis  of  the  host  into  a  pupa  without 
being  affected  by  the  general  changes,  and  not  even  by  the  histolytic  processes 
which  occur  during  this  period.  In  evaluating  these  observations  we  must, 
however,  consider  the  fact  that  in  all  the  transplantations  in  insects  discussed 
so  far,  we  have  to  deal  with  transplantations  not  in  adult  forms,  but  in  cater- 
pillars and  pupae. 

Some  remarkable  successes  in  transplantation  have  been  reported  by  W. 
Finkler.  According  to  this  author,  it  is  possible  in  the  insect  species  Hydro- 
philus  to  replace  the  head  which  has  been  cut  off,  by  grafting  the  head  of 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  225 

another  individual  of  the  same  species;  this  kind  of  transplantation  appar- 
ently succeeded  also  between  different  species  if  they  were  nearly  related 
(Hydrophilus  and  Dytiscus),  but  not  between  farther  distant  species.  Finkler 
states  that  the  head  thus  transplanted  determines  to  a  large  extent  the  sexual 
reflexes  and  the  color  of  the  body  in  the  host.  But  other  investigators  were 
not  successful  in  repeating  these  experiments,  and  according  to  Przibram  no 
connection  takes  place  between  the  nerve  strands  of  the  grafted  head  and  the 
body. 

As  to  echinoderms,  these  organisms  are  very  unfavorable  for  transplan- 
tation experiments  on  account  of  their  rigid  integument,  and  very  few 
investigations  have  been  reported.  However,  Przibram  succeeded  in  homoio- 
transplantation  of  the  disc  in  crinoids ;  also  in  transplanting  this  organ  into 
other  varieties  differing  from  each  other  in  their  color;  and  even  in  the 
starfish  H.  D.  King  accomplished,  in  one  exceptional  case,  a  homoiotrans- 
plantation,  in  which  however  the  ectoderm  of  host  and  transplant  was  the  only 
tissue  which  underwent  union. 

As  far  as  we  can  judge  from  the  relatively  limited  number  of  experiments 
in  arthropods  and  echinoderms,  these  organisms  seem  to  behave  in  a  similar 
way  to  lumbricidae  as  far  as  manifestation  of  organismal  differentials  is 
concerned,  provided  we  disregard  more  or  less  accidental  difficulties  in  trans- 
plantation due  to  peculiarities  in  the  structure  of  these  animals.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  difference  between  the  results  of  homoiotransplantation  and  hetero- 
transplantation of  ovaries  in  the  experiments  of  Kopec  indicates  that,  after 
all,  the  sensitiveness  to  heterodifferentials  may  be  greater  in  this  class  than  in 
lumbricidae,  and  that  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  strange  transplant 
may  be  more  complex.  We  have  furthermore  to  consider  the  possibility  that 
the  relatively  low  degree  of  regenerative  power  which  these  organisms  possess 
may  render  the  manifestation  of  a  reaction  against  transplants  possessing  a 
different  organismal  differential  more  difficult  than  in  lower  organisms. 

In  evaluating  the  relative  significance  of  organismal  differentials  in  the 
various  classes  of  animals  which  we  have  analyzed  so  far,  we  must  in  addition 
to  the  complications  already  mentioned,  take  account  of  the  fact  that  our 
estimates  as  to  reactions  against  strange  differentials  are  based  largely  on  a 
gross  study  of  the  grafts.  A  study  of  the  finer  cellular  reactions,  which  may 
have  occurred,  is  lacking,  and  if  undertaken  it  might  have  made  possible  a 
finer  gradation  of  the  organismal  differentials.  As  stated,  auto-  and  homoio- 
transplantation show  no  marked  differences  in  results  in  these  various  classes 
of  animals,  and  even  heterotransplantation  succeeded  in  a  number  of  cases 
between  more  nearly  related  species.  In  these  respects  the  different  classes 
so  far  considered  have  behaved  in  a  similar  manner. 

Much  more  pronounced  were  the  differences  in  the  rigidity  of  organization 
and  in  the  possibility  of  inducing  new  organ  formation  or  of  transforming 
one  organ  into  another  in  these  types  of  animals.  As  regards  these  reactions, 
we  find  a  definitely  graded  series,  beginning  with  the  hydroids  and  ascending 
by  way  of  planarians  to  the  annelids  and  then  to  the  arthropods.  In  the  latter, 
only  small  parts  of  the  body  can  undergo  far  reaching  changes;  we  refer  in 


226  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

particular  to  the  changes  in  the  head  appendages  which  may  be  induced 
in  certain  crustaceans  and  in  which  the  activity  of  the  nervous  system  is  of 
importance ;  here,  also,  regeneration  is  on  the  whole  limited  to  the  extremities 
and  other  appendages. 

In  general,  the  transformation  from  one  part  of  the  body  into  another,  or 
from  one  organ  into  another,  seems  as  a  rule  not  to  be  a  direct  one,  but  this 
change  is  apparently  accomplished  by  the  return  of  the  part  of  the  body  or 
of  the  organ  involved  to  a  more  indifferent  state,  which  subsequently  assumes 
the  characteristics  of  the  new  part  or  organ.  Furthermore,  it  appears  that 
with  increasing  phylogenetic  development,  cells  with  relatively  great  poten- 
tialities of  further  differentiation  may  take  over  the  newformation  of  organs. 

C.  Transplantation  and  Individuality  in  Adult  Amphibia 

In  our  discussion  of  organismal  differentials  in  amphibia,  we  shall  omit, 
for  the  present,  transplantations  in  which  host  and  transplant,  or  host  and 
partner,  are  embryonal;  these  we  shall  consider  later.  Furthermore,  some 
transplantations  in  amphibia  were  used  for  the  analysis  of  the  factors  under- 
lying metamorphosis,  and  these  investigations  will  also  be  considered  sep- 
arately. There  remain  for  our  present  purpose  a  number  of  transplantations 
in  adult  urodeles  and  anurans,  two  groups  in  which  the  results  differ  in 
certain  respects.  Of  special  interest  are  the  transplantations  of  pigmented  to 
white  skin  and  vice  versa,  because  the  behavior  of  the  pigment  may  serve 
as  an  additional  indicator  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  graft. 

In  the  urodele,  Triton  alpestris,  homoiotransplantation  of  skin  succeeded 
well,  as  did  likewise  heterotransplantation  of  skin  from  Triton  alpestris  to 
Triton  cristatus,  but  in  the  latter  type  the  healing  took  place  more  slowly  than 
in  homoiotransplants.  The  white  transplant  assumed  gradually  the  dark  color 
of  the  host  skin.  On  the  other  hand,  Triton  salaratus  did  not,  as  a  rule,  tolerate 
transplants  from  Triton  alpestris  but  casted  them  off  (Taube).  In  the  sala- 
mander, Diemictylus  viridescens,  Collins  and  Adolph  did  not  observe  a  differ- 
ence between  the  results  of  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  transplantation  of 
skin;  both  remained  preserved,  but  in  both,  a  re-organization  of  the  pigmen- 
tation took  place. 

In  anurans,  the  differences  between  the  results  of  auto-,  homoio-  and 
heterotransplantation  of  skin  were  more  pronounced.  We  may  here  refer  also 
to  transplantations  in  frog  tadpoles,  where  autogenous  transplants  of  white 
skin  to  pigmented  areas  remained  preserved,  but  very  slowly,  pigmentation 
could  occur  in  the  graft,  caused  apparently  by  changes  which  took  place  in 
the  transplanted  epidermis  itself.  After  homoiotransplantation,  the  skin  healed 
in  more  slowly,  a  relatively  rapid  invasion  of  the  white  skin  by  the  pigmented 
cells  of  the  host  occurred,  and  lymphocytes  accumulated  underneath  the 
transplant  (Cole).  In  adult  Rana  pipiens,  according  to  Hadley,  autogenous 
surface  epithelium  and  glands  healed  in  well,  whereas  homoiotransplantation 
of  skin  succeeded  not  as  readily,  the  number  of  unsuccessful  grafts  being 
greater  and  the  pigmented  cells  of  the  host  growing  into  the  graft.  Still  less 
favorable  were  heterotransplantations  from  Rana  pipiens  to  Rana  clamitans. 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  227 

The  healing-in  took  place  with  greater  difficulty  and  pigmented  grafts  that 
remained  attached  to  the  host  for  more  than  15  days  became  progressively 
lighter,  whereas  the  unpigmented  grafts  were  invaded  by  the  pigmented  host 
skin;  degenerative  changes  took  place  in  the  transplant  and  large  masses  of 
leucocytes  collected  underneath  it.  There  were  then,  in  anurans,  graded 
differences  in  the  tolerance  of  the  host  to  autogenous,  homoiogenous  and 
heterogenous  transplants,  and  the  reactions  against  strange  organismal  dif- 
ferentials were,  here,  more  definite  than  in  urodeles.  It  is  of  interest  that 
heterotransplantation  into  the  lymph-sac  succeeded,  and  this  suggests  that  it 
was  the  action  of  the  tissues  rather  than  that  of  the  bodyfluids  which  caused 
the  injury  of  the  heterogenous  graft. 

We  may  mention  in  this  connection  also  similar  experiments  of  May  in 
reptiles.  In  chameleon,  May  found  that  autotransplantation  of  skin  succeeded 
very  readily,  without  any  change  in  the  pigmentation  of  the  transplants.  On 
the  other  hand,  homoiotransplants  were  absorbed  after  they  had  healed  in, 
the  total  absorption  taking  place  between  the  61st  and  90th  day.  Usually  no 
change  in  pigmentation  occurred  here,  except  in  one  case,  where  the  trans- 
plant became  lighter.  Conditions  were  then,  in  this  case,  similar  to  those  seen 
in  birds  and  mammals,  except  that  the  reactions  occurred  more  slowly; 
whether  or  not  lymphocytes  participated' in  these  experiments  in  reptiles  is 
not  stated. 

The  results  of  transplantations  of  other  organs  are  in  essential  agreement 
with  those  we  have  mentioned.  Thus,  in  the  salamander,  Diemictylus  viri- 
descens,  Stockard  found  that  homoiotransplanted  pieces  of  the  ovary  can  be 
maintained  alive  in  a  satisfactory  condition  in  the  testicle,  but  not  in  other 
organs.  However,  in  other  urodeles,  Harms  showed  that  not  only  homoio- 
transplantation,  but  even  heterotransplantation,  of  the  ovaries  may  succeed 
within  a  certain  range  of  relationship,  and  that  in  general  there  seems  to  be  a 
parallelism  in  the  transplantability  of  tissues  and  the  possibility  of  hybridiza- 
tion between  certain  species.  In  this  connection,  Harms  made  the  interesting 
observation  that  in  urodeles  blood  vessels  of  heterogenous  origin  supply  the 
circulation  in  these  transplants,  and  that  the  peritoneal  cells  lining  the  grafted 
ovaries  may  swell,  send  out  processes  in  the  direction  towards  the  lining 
peritoneal  cells  of  the  host,  and  that  both  may  then  meet  and  coalesce.  In  adult 
urodeles,  therefore,  heterogenous  cells  may  enter  into  close  contact  with  each 
other,  or  may  coalesce  apparently  without  the  development  of  any  antagonistic 
reaction.  Meyns  noted  a  similar  coalescence  of  cells  also  in  anurans,  but  it 
occurred  in  homoiogenous  transplantations.  In  case  a  destruction  of  the 
heterotransplanted  ovary  did  take  place,  this  may  not  have  been  altogether  a 
direct  effect  of  heterotoxins,  inasmuch  as  connective  tissue  and  phagocytic 
cells  of  the  host  took  part  in  the  disintegration  and  elimination  of  those  trans- 
planted ova  which  had  escaped  the  direct  toxic  action  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the 
host.  It  seems,  therefore,  that  ova  which,  under  the  influence  of  the  strange 
organismal  differential  were  changed  in  their  metabolism,  secondarily  were 
exposed  to  the  injurious  action  of  host  cells. 

In  mammals  we  observed  in  certain  cases  that  reciprocal  transplantations 


228  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

did  not  behave  in  the  same  way ;  similarly,  in  urodeles  some  differences  have 
been  noted;  thus,  transplantations  of  the  ovaries  from  Triton  alpestris  to 
Amblystoma  tigrinum  succeeded,  while  in  the  reciprocal  transplantation  the 
graft  exerted  a  toxic  effect  on  the  host.  However,  it  is  possible  that  in  this 
instance  we  have  to  deal  not  with  the  direct  effect  of  the  organismal  differen- 
tials, but  with  specific  toxic  substances,  the  production  of  which  is  limited 
to  certain  organs. 

Also,  heterotransplantations  of  testicle  were  successful  in  some  species  of 
Triton  (Koppanyi).  But  if  certain  organs  are  grafted  with  greater  difficulty, 
then  it  is  possible  to  make  homoio-  and  auto-,  but  not  heterotransplantations. 
Thus,  according  to  Kurz,  limbs  can  be  homoiotransplanted  in  adult  Triton 
and  even  regeneration  may  take  place  in  autogenous  as  well  as  in  homoiogenous 
grafts  of  this  kind ;  but  heterotransplantation  does  not  succeed.  Similar  obser- 
vations have  been  made  by  Mathey  in  the  case  of  transplantation  of  the  eyes 
in  Salamander  larvae  and  in  adult  Tritons.  Under  these  conditions  even 
autotransplantation  succeeds  only  in  a  small  minority  of  cases,  and  still  greater 
difficulties  are  encountered  in  the  case  of  homoiotransplantation.  In  Triton, 
the  presence  of  a  functioning  spleen,  or  of  substances  given  off  by  this  organ, 
may  be  an  unfavorable  factor  in  the  transplantation  of  this  tissue.  Ehrenpreis 
accomplished,  therefore,  a  homoiotransplantation  of  spleen  only  in  urodeles 
in  which  the  spleen  had  previously  been  extirpated;  but  even  in  this  case 
autotransplantation  seems  to  have  been  preferable  to  homoiotransplantation 
(Jolly  and  Lieure). 

If  we  compare  the  range  in  which  transplantations  are  possible  in  anurans 
and  in  urodeles,  we  find  a  greater  restriction  in  the  former.  Welti  succeeded 
in  homoiotransplantation  of  the  ovaries  in  Bufo  vulgaris,  while  transplanta- 
tions into  different  races  failed.  The  successfully  transplanted  ovaries  gave 
off  hormones  which  modified  certain  secondary  sex  characters  in  the  host. 
Meyns  observed  that  the  testicle  is  readily  homoiotransplanted  in  immature 
frogs,  but  can  be  heterotransplanted  only  in  exceptional  cases.  In  adult  frogs 
even  homoiotransplantation  does  not  produce  as  favorable  results  as  autotrans- 
plantation, an  observation  which  indicates  that  also  homoiodifferentials  may 
exert  here  an  injurious  effect  on  tissues.  Furthermore,  this  investigator  noted, 
in  accordance  with  the  findings  in  the  case  of  mammalian  organs,  that  different 
constituents  of  an  organ  may  differ  in  the  degree  of  sensitiveness  which  they 
manifest;  the  efferent  ducts  of  the  testicle  were  less  sensitive  to  the  injurious 
effects  of  transplantation  than  the  generative  cells  proper.  As  in  Tritons, 
so  also  in  anurans  a  specific  hormone  may  inhibit  the  successful  transplantation 
of  an  organ  with  an  internal  secretion.  Thus  transplantation  of  the  testicle  was 
possible  neither  in  normal  males  nor  in  normal  females,  but  only  in  castrated 
animals.  Which  phase  in  the  process  of  transplantation  is  here  affected  by  the 
internal  secretion,  whether  it  is  the  healing-in  of  the  graft  or  its  subsequent 
preservation,  is  not  clear  from  the  data  on  hand;  nor  do  we  know  whether 
the  destruction  of  the  transplant  takes  place  directly  under  the  influence  of 
the  injurious  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  or  through  the  mediation  of  the  host 
lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue  cells. 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  229 

An  internal  secretion  is  also  active  after  homoiotransplantation  of  thumb- 
pads  of  the  frog;  however,  in  this  case  the  testicular  hormone  affects  only  the 
further  growth  processes  in  the  organ  after  it  has  healed  in;  and  according 
to  Harms,  it  accomplishes  this  effect  largely  by  means  other  than  variations 
in  the  circulatory  condition  and  blood  supply  received  by  the  transplant. 

Rhoda  Erdmann  noted  that  in  the  adult  Rana  autotransplantation  of  skin 
succeeded  well;  but  homoiotransplantation  succeeded  only  for  periods  of 
from  two  to  four  months,  and  skin  glands  did  not  develop  in  the  latter  kind 
of  transplants.  But  even  after  heterotransplantation  from  Rana  temporaria 
to  Rana  arvalis  the  graft  could  remain  attached  to  the  host  for  as  long  as 
eighty  days,  when  it  was  cast  off.  Similar  to  the  observations  of  Harms  as  to 
toxic  effects  exerted  by  ovaries  transplanted  into  Triton,  and  to  those  of 
Diirken  in  the  transplantation  of  parts  of  neurulae  into  larvae  of  Rana,  Erd- 
mann noted  after  transplantation  of  skin  of  Hyla  to  Rana,  the  occurrence  of 
hemorrhages  and  other  toxic  symptoms  in  the  host.  These  results  agree  also 
with  those  of  Schultz,  who  found  that  after  transplantation  of  skin  from  Bufo 
viridis  to  Bufo  vulgaris,  the  host  died,  while  the  reciprocal  transplantations 
were  successful.  It  is  evident  that  specific  toxins  given  off  by  such  transplants 
complicate  the  results  of  grafting  in  these  amphibia,  and  that  we  have  not 
merely  to  deal  with  the  effects  of  organismal  differentials.  As  stated  above, 
similar  effects  have  also  been  observed  after  transplantation  in  certain 
urodeles. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  heterotransplantations  succeed  with  greater 
difficulty  in  urodeles  than  in  lower  classes  of  animals,  and  with  still  greater 
difficulty  in  anurans.  In  the  latter  class  some  differences  have  been  recorded 
even  between  the  results  of  homoio-  and  autotransplantation,  and  we  may  then 
conclude  that  a  furthergoing  stage  in  specialization  of  these  differentials  has 
been  reached  in  amphibia,  and  that  within  the  amphibia  there  is  seen  a  graded 
advance  in  the  refinement  of  the  organismal  differentials  in  the  transition  from 
urodeles  to  anurans.  However,  as  we  pointed  out  previously,  the  lack  of  an 
unfavorable  reaction  of  a  host  against  a  certain  kind  of  transplant  does  not 
exclude  the  presence  of  the  finer  grades  of  organismal  differentials.  Thus  we 
cannot  exclude  the  possibility  that  in  urodeles,  as  well,  individuality  differen- 
tials may  exist;  indeed,  certain  observations  indicate  that  here,  also,  auto- 
transplantation may  succeed  better  than  homoiotransplantation. 

The  interpretation  of  the  results  of  transplantations  in  the  more  primitive 
organisms  which  we  have  discussed  so  far,  is  based  largely  on  the  gross 
examination  of  the  transplants ;  however,  in  the  case  of  grafting  in  the  urodele 
Triturus,  Anderson  and  Horowitz  have  carried  out  microscopical  examina- 
tions, in  which  they  compared  the  reactions  in  auto-,  homoio-,  and  hetero- 
transplantations of  skin  (Anderson),  and  muscle  tissue  (Horowitz).  Horo- 
witz has  described  a  reaction  of  the  fibroblasts  and  lymphocytes  of  the  host, 
which  invaded  the  transplant  the  more  actively,  the  stranger  the  organismal 
differentials  were  between  host  and  transplant.  In  the  case  of  heterotrans- 
plants,  also  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  participated  in  this  reaction.  These 
various  cells  succeeded  in  destroying  tissues  possessing  organismal  differ- 


230  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

entials  incompatible  with  those  of  the  host.  In  principle,  conditions  are 
therefore  similar  to  those  found  by  us  in  the  case  of  mammalian  tissues;  a 
difference  exists  only  in  that  the  reactions  in  urodeles  were  slower  than  in 
rodents,  and  also  in  that  lymphocytes  and  fibroblasts  later  destroyed  parts 
of  the  autotransplants,  while  other  parts  remained  preserved ;  these  reactions 
against  autogenous  tissues  were  presumably  due  to  necrobiotic  changes  which 
occurred  in  certain  areas  of  the  grafts.  In  both  urodeles  and  mammals  the 
vascularization  of  autotransplants  was  better  than  that  of  homoio-  and  hetero- 
transplants. 

Also,  Hitchcock  finds  that  frog  skin  autotransplanted  into  the  lymph  sac 
of  frogs  remains  preserved  much  longer  than  heterotransplanted  skin.  Ulti- 
mately, however,  it  is  destroyed  through  the  ingrowth  of  fibroblasts ;  but  this 
result  is  due  merely  to  accidental  factors  and  not  to  factors  inherent  in 
amphibian  tissues,  as  is  evidenced  by  the  fact  that  skin  autotransplanted  into 
a  defect  of  skin  remains  preserved  indefinitely.  Similar  results  may  be  obtained 
in  mammals  and  birds,  for  example,  when  skin  is  injured  after  autotrans- 
plantation  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue.  Following  heterotransplantation  of 
frog  skin,  the  transplant  is  destroyed  much  more  rapidly  than  after  autotrans- 
plantation  and  the  destruction  takes  place  the  more  rapidly  the  farther  distant 
phylogenetically  the  species  of  host  and  transplant;  frog  skin  dies  very 
quickly  after  transplantation  into  Triturus  and  Triturus  skin  becomes  necrotic 
within  a  very  short  time  after  transplantation  into  the  frog.  After  trans- 
plantation into  urodele  species,  it  is  the  heterotoxin  of  the  bodyfluids  which 
kills  the  transplants,  while  after  heterotransplantation  into  Rana,  the  injury 
is  due,  above  all,  to  the  action  of  leucocytes.  In  the  tissue  surrounding  the 
graft,  lymphocytes  accumulate.  Conditions  here  are  therefore,  in  principle, 
similar  to  those  after  heterotransplantation  of  mammalian  and  avian  tissues; 
only  in  the  latter  the  injurious  action  of  the  bodyfluids  is  evident  in  every 
instance,  while,  according  to  Hitchcock,  this  effect  is  not  noticeable  after 
transplantation  of  frog  skin  into  more  nearly  related  species.  Presumably  we 
have,  in  the  case  of  frog  skin,  to  deal  merely  with  quantitative  differences 
in  the  effects  of  toxins  and  of  cellular  reactions,  such  as  were  observed  also 
in  the  case  of  mammalian  tissue,  where  we  noted  that  heterotransplantation 
of  cartilage  produced  cellular  reactions  which  were  much  more  prominent  than 
those  following  heterotransplantation  of  such  very  sensitive  tissues  as  thyroid 
and  kidney,  which  are  destroyed  by  strange  bodyfluids  within  a  very  short 
time.  We  have  found  also  other  instances  of  quantitative  differences  between 
the  respective  importance  of  toxic  serum  and  cellular  reactions  in  different 
species  of  mammals.  It  has  been  assumed  in  the  case  of  tumor  transplantation 
that  necrosis  primarily  attacks  the  center  of  the  pieces  and  not  the  peripheral 
parts,  which  indicates  that  an  injurious  action  of  the  bodyfluids  on  the  trans- 
plant is  lacking.  Hitchcock  uses  the  same  argument  in  order  to  prove  the 
absence  of  an  injurious  action  of  the  bodyfluids  after  transplantation  of  skin 
of  Rana  into  strange  species  of  Rana.  Nevertheless,  homoiotoxic  action  does 
exist  in  the  case  of  tumors  as  well  as  of  normal  mammalian  tissues;  and  we 
may  draw  the  same  conclusion  in  regard  to  heterotoxic  action  in  heterotrans- 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  231 

plantation  among  anuran  species.  The  center  of  the  graft  degenerates  first 
because  it  is  injured  by  the  lack  of  foodstuffs;  it  succumbs  therefore  before 
the  peripheral  parts  do,  which  resist  the  injurious  action  of  the  bodyfluids 
better,  since  they  are  near  the  source  of  oxygen  and  the  foodstuffs.  Careful 
microscopic  studies  of  grafts  in  amphibians  tend  to  prove,  therefore,  that 
here,  in  principle,  already  a  fargoing  specialization  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials has  taken  place  and  that  this  specialization  manifests  itself  in  a  similar 
manner  in  amphibia  and  in  mammals. 

In  progressing  from  the  urodeles  to  the  anurans  there  is  thus  noted  an 
advance  in  the  specificity  of  the  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host  against  a 
strange  organismal  differential.  Furthermore,  parallel  to  this  progression  in 
specificity  a  reverse  change  takes  place  in  the  regenerative  and  integrative 
power  of  these  classes  of  animals.  While  this  is  very  much  more  restricted 
in  urodeles  than  in  the  primitive  invertebrates,  still  a  certain  degree  of  the 
power  of  regeneration  has  been  retained  by  them,  as  indicated  by  their  ability 
to  regenerate  extremities.  In  the  anurans,  on  the  other  hand,  only  the  rudi- 
ments of  this  integrative  power  are  left,  consisting  merely  in  the  ability  of  a 
number  of  individual  tissues  to  undergo,  to  a  moderate  degree,  proliferative 
processes,  which  may  lead  to  the  filling-out  of  certain  defects  and  to  wound 
healing  in  the  skin.  In  accordance  with' our  previous  conclusions  we  find, 
therefore,  also  in  this  instance  a  parallelism  between  the  degree  of  plasticity 
in  the  organ-forming  potencies  of  organisms  and  the  development  of  the 
finer  organismal  differentials.  The  greater  the  trans formability  of  organs  and 
the  greater  the  restitutive  and  integrative  power  of  organisms,  the  more 
undifferentiated  appear  to  be  the  organismal  differentials  and  the  less  specific 
are  their  effects. 

From  this  brief  survey  of  the  behavior  of  organismal  differentials  during 
phylogenetic  development  we  may  conclude  that  already  in  the  most  primitive 
organisms  certain  reactions  against  tissues  from  strange  species  are  present, 
and  that  these  reactions  become  more  refined  and  specific  with  the  advance 
to  groups  of  animals  whose  structure  is  more  complex.  But  we  observe  also 
that  with  progressing  evolution  the  differentiation  of  organs  and  tissues,  their 
decreasing  plasticity  and  increasing  fixity  are  much  more  clearly  graded  than 
is  the  refinement  of  the  organismal  differentials.  No  definite  advance  was 
observable  in  the  individualization  of  organismal  differentials  within  the  most 
primitive  classes  of  animals ;  they  all  seemed  to  behave  in  a  similar  manner. 
However,  this  lack  of  steady  progression  is  perhaps  only  apparent  and  not 
real.  It  may  be  at  least  due  partly  to  the  method  used  for  the  demonstration 
of  the  organismal  differentials,  namely,  observation  of  the  reactions  which 
take  place  in  an  animal  against  a  strange  transplant,  or  between  two  partners 
differing  in  their  organismal  differentials;  now,  in  the  lowest  organisms  the 
tendency  to  integration  is  very  great  and  there  is  the  danger  that  the  integra- 
tive reactions  which  follow  various  kinds  of  disturbances  may  be  interpreted 
as  reactions  against  strange  organismal  differentials.  Furthermore,  we  may 
recall  the  great  complexity  of  the  factors  which  enter  into  the  reactions  against 
strange  organismal  differentials,  and  the  fact  that  the  intensity  of  these  reac- 


232  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tions  is  determined  not  only  by  the  presence  of  the  finely  differentiated  sub- 
stances, which  represent  the  organismal  differentials  in  tissues  and  organs, 
but  also  by  the  rate  at  which  such  substances  are  produced,  given  off  by  the 
cells  and  allowed  to  diffuse  into  the  strange  organism ;  finally,  the  results  of 
the  reactions  vary  with  the  sensitiveness  of  the  tissues  involved.  As  far  as  the 
injurious  effects  of  incompatible  bodyfluids  are  concerned,  our  ability  to 
discern  these  depends  mainly  on  the  sensitiveness  of  the  tissues  on  which  they 
act;  on  the  other  hand,  the  strength  of  the  cellular  reactions  against  tissues 
with  strange  organismal  differentials  is,  to  a  certain  extent,  susceptible  to 
measurement,  even  if  the  tissues  are  more  resistant. 

We  see,  thus,  that  we  have  to  deal  with  a  considerable  number  of  factors 
if  we  wish  to  grade  the  degree  of  compatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials 
of  different  organisms.  With  regard  to  the  higher  organisms,  only  a  beginning 
has  been  made  in  the  approximate  quantitative  grading  of  these  incompati- 
bilities; in  the  case  of  the  more  primitive  organisms  the  observations  which 
bear  on  this  question  are  more  or  less  casual  and  are  based  largely  on  gross 
aspects  of  the  changes  following  transplantation.  The  introduction  of  micro- 
scopical methods  for  the  study  of  cellular  reactions  against  strange  differen- 
tials, methods  similar  to  those  used  in  the  case  of  mammalian  tissues,  has  only 
recently  been  undertaken  in  the  study  of  transplantations  in  urodeles.  The 
results  already  indicate  that  reactions  against  strange  tissues,  endowed  with 
strange  individuality  differentials,  are  present  in  classes  of  animals  where  the 
methods  formerly  used  were  not  adequate  for  their  demonstration.  In  addi- 
tion, there  are  the  immunological  studies  of  the  relationship  of  the  bodyfluids 
of  various  organisms ;  these  are  based  on  the  ability  of  bodyfluids  to  serve  as 
antigens  and  to  call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies,  which  latter,  in  their 
interactions  with  antigens,  indicate  the  relationship  between  various  species 
of  animals.  These  investigations  will  be  discussed  in  a  subsequent  chapter. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  in  the  most  primitive  classes  of  animals  the 
substances  which  represent  the  organismal  differentials  or  at  least  the  reactions 
against  these  differentials  are  as  yet  less  finely  differentiated  than  in  higher 
organisms,  and  that  in  general  there  is  a  correspondence  between  the  lack  of  a 
finer  differentiation  of  organismal  differentials  and  the  lack  in  the  finer  differ- 
entiation of  organs  and  tissues,  and  an  inverse  correspondence  between  the 
degree  of  development  of  organismal  differentials  and  the  degree  of  plasticity 
of  these  organs. 

As  stated  above,  the  graded  progression  towards  an  increase  in  the  speci- 
ficity and  fixity  of  organs  and  tissues  in  the  course  of  evolution  are  clearly 
discernible.  With  advancing  phylogenetic  development  the  various  parts  of 
the  body  differentiate  more  and  more  into  a  variety  of  organs,  tissues  and 
cells,  interacting  with  each  other  according  to  patterns  which  are  specific  and 
rigid.  Hand  in  hand  with  this  change  from  the  relatively  simple  structures  of 
such  primitive  organisms  as  the  hydrozoa,  to  the  greatly  differentiated  types 
of  organs,  tissues  and  cells  of  the  anuran  amphibia,  there  takes  place  a  change 
also  in  the  kind  of  substances  which  regulate  the  interaction  of  the  different 
parts  of  the  individual.  In  hydrozoa  we  must  assume  that  substances  repre- 


HIGHER  INVERTEBRATES  AND  AMPHIBIA  233 

senting  various  kinds  of  inductors  exist  and  are  transferred  from  one  part 
of  the  body  to  another;  these,  acting  on  a  specific  substratum  of  a  very  plastic 
nature,  are  presumably  responsible  for  the  production  and  growth  of  the 
organ  systems  which  are  characteristic  of  the  different  regions  of  the  body. 
In  arthropods  such  transformations  are  limited  to  certain  appendages,  and 
also  in  urodele  amphibia  integrative  processes  are  possible  only  within  a  very 
limited  range;  but  in  anuran  amphibia  they  are  lacking  altogether.  There 
develop  in  insects  and  in  the  higher  organisms,  in  accordance  with  their  more 
finely  differentiated  organs  and  tissues,  hormones  and  neuro-hormones  which 
affect  certain  organs  and  cells  in  a  very  specific  manner.  Such  hormones  may 
also  affect  the  life  and  growth  of  transplanted  organs  with  which  they  have 
specific  relations.  Perhaps  a  corresponding  increasing  differentiation  exists 
also  in  the  case  of  various  other  substances,  such  as  vitamins  and  enzymes, 
which  regulate  maintenance,  growth  and  metabolism  of  organs  and  tissues; 
but  we  have  as  yet  no  definite  knowledge  as  to  the  phylogenetic  development 
of  the  latter  types  of  substances. 


Chapter  J 

Transplantation  and  Individuality  of 
Embryonal   Tissues 

We  have  studied  the  phylogenetic  development  of  organismal  dif- 
ferentials and  their  manifestations  in  animals,  using  transplantation 
of  adult  tissues  as  indicator.  In  this  and  the  following  chapter  we 
shall  study  the  ontogenetic  development  of  the  organismal  differentials  and 
for  this  purpose  we  shall  make  use  of  the  data  supplied  by  the  transplantation 
of  embryonal  tissues.  In  these  experiments  either  parts  of  developing  organ- 
isms were  joined  together,  each  of  which  was  capable  of  independent  life,  or 
relatively  small,  not  independently  viable  pieces  of  embryonal  tissues  or  organs 
were  transplanted  into  embryonal  or  adult  organisms.  The  union  of  inde- 
pendently viable  parts  bears  some  resemblance  to  parabiosis  especially  if  the 
size  of  the  surface,  by  means  of  which  the  partners  are  joined  together,  is 
relatively  small  in  comparison  with  the  diameters  of  the  grafts. 

I.  Transplantation  in  Amphibia.  It  was  in  amphibia  that  the  possibility  of 
uniting  parts  of  two  different  embryos  into  one  organism  was  discovered  in 
1897  by  Born,  whose  work  thus  introduced  a  problem  which  subsequently 
suggested  many  similar  investigations  in  amphibia  as  well  as  in  other  classes 
of  animals. 

Born  used  in  his  experiments  larvae  of  anuran  amphibia.  In  these  as  in 
other  transplantations,  besides  the  organismal  differentials,  other  factors,  some 
of  which  were  non-specific,  helped  to  determine  the  results,  and  it  is  im- 
portant, as  far  as  feasible,  to  separate  these  factors.  Thus,  the  rapidity  of 
growth  of  larvae  of  Rana  esculenta  is  greater  than  that  of  larvae  of  Rana 
fusca  or  arvalis,  and  in  the  union  of  parts  of  the  former  with  parts  of  one 
of  the  two  latter  larvae,  components  of  Rana  esculenta  tend  to  dominate  over 
the  other  components  and  cause  their  atrophy.  It  is  necessary  to  distinguish 
such  secondary  effects  from  the  direct  manifestations  of  organismal  differ- 
entials, although  the  growth  rate  is,  of  course,  as  well  as  all  other  character- 
istics of  tissues  and  organs,  at  least  in  part,  determined  also  by  the  genetic 
constitution  of  the  organism. 

As  a  direct  effect  of  the  organismal  differentials,  we  may  consider  the 
readiness  with  which  autotransplantation  of  embryonal  constituents  succeeds : 
two  parts  can  be  readily  united  into  a  single  organism,  in  which  the  corre- 
sponding organs  form  so  perfect  a  connection  that,  subsequently,  the  place 
of  junction  can,  as  a  rule,  no  longer  be  recognized;  however,  difficulty  may 
be  experienced  in  the  joining  together  of  the  components  of  the  chorda  dor- 
salis,  especially  in  older  larvae.  As  in  adult  annelids,  so  also  in  amphibian 
embryos  analogous  organs  of  the  partners  usually  find  each  other  and  unite. 

The  results  of  homoiotransplantation  are  about  the  same  as  those  of  auto- 

234 


INDIVIDUALITY  OF  EMBRYONAL  TISSUES  235 

transplantation.  Here,  too,  all  kinds  of  combinations  succeed,  including  the 
union  of  smaller  parts,  which  as  such  would  not  be  capable  of  independent 
life,  with  larger  parts  of  larvae;  in  these  experiments  abnormalities,  such  as 
organisms  possessing  two  heads,  may  develop  under  certain  conditions.  Also, 
in  homoiotransplantation  analogous  organs  tend  to  find  and  join  each  other 
and  usually  it  is  impossible  to  recognize  later  the  original  line  of  demarcation. 
No  incompatibilities  due  to  differences  in  individuality  differentials  develop, 
and  such  combinations  of  organisms  may  even  pass  through  metamorphosis. 
If  difficulties  do  arise,  they  are  of  a  non-specific  nature. 

Similar  were  the  results  in  heterotransplantation  if  the  partners  belonged 
to  nearly  related  species.  In  this  case  also  the  analogous  organs  of  the  two 
partners  had  the  tendency  to  unite  and  thus  the  two  partners  developed  into 
one  homogeneous  organism,  in  which  no  scar  could  be  recognized  at  the  point 
of  union;  but  when  non-analogous  organs  of  embryonal  partners  happened 
to  join,  a  scar  did  form,  or  else  the  organs  separated  after  some  time.  As  we 
have  noted  previously,  in  the  joining-together  of  pieces  of  adult  lumbricidae 
there  developed  at  first  a  scar,  which  only  secondarily  was  replaced  by  the 
specific  tissues.  While  the  rates  of  growth  in  the  two  partners  could  be 
independent  of  each  other,  the  rates  of  differentiation  were  about  the  same, 
substances  circulating  in  both  partners  determining  presumably  the  latter 
effect.  As  we  shall  see  later,  Uhlenhuth,  in  transplanting  eyes  in  salamander 
larvae,  found  a  similar  correspondence  in  the  rate  of  differentiation  and  in 
the  time  of  metamorphosis  of  host  and  graft.  There  resulted,  thus,  not  only 
a  harmonious  union  of  the  two  embryos  belonging  to  different  species,  but  in 
certain  cases  even  the  blood  vessels  of  one  partner  could  grow  into  the  other 
partner  apparently  without  causing  any  incompatibility. 

We  find,  then,  that  heterodifferentials  do  not  need  to  prevent  the  direct 
union  of  the  specific  tissues  in  analogous  organs  without  interference  by 
connective  tissue;  this  was  true  also  of  parts  of  the  nervous  system,  even  in 
cases  in  which  the  diameters  of  the  components  differed  in  the  partners.  On 
the  other  hand,  if  non-analogous  organs  happened  to  meet,  as  stated,  the 
union  took  place  by  means  of  connective  tissue,  except  in  the  case  of  ecto- 
dermal and  entodermal  epithelia.  These  observations  suggest  that  under  these 
conditions  tissue  differentials  functioning  as  contact  substances  regulate  the 
interaction  of  tissues  from  analogous  organs  at  the  point  of  junction,  although 
the  species  differentials  of  the  corresponding  tissues  differ  in  the  two  partners. 

While  after  union  of  embryos  from  different  species  of  Rana,  the  results 
were  similar  to  those  obtained  in  homoiotransplantation,  such  combinations 
were  not  able  to  maintain  themselves  for  longer  than  two  to  three  weeks  when 
species  as  distant  as  Rana  esculenta  and  Bombinator  igneus  were  united. 
Although  for  some  time  in  the  beginning  the  partners  could  develop  normally 
and  the  double  organisms  begin  to  feed  themselves,  after  awhile  they  became 
sickly  and  progress  ceased.  Therefore,  in  the  case  of  transplantation  of  more 
distant  species,  heterotoxins  apparently  led  to  various  abnormal  conditions 
in  the  animals.  In  Born's  experiments  circulatory  disturbances  became  mani- 
fest after  about  fourteen  to  sixteen  days;  there  was  either  edema  or  no 


236  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

circulation  at  all  and  death  followed.  Also  in  the  subsequent  experiments  of 
Braus,  who  showed  that  under  favorable  conditions  the  life  of  such  combina- 
tions could  be  prolonged  for  as  long  as  five  weeks,  ultimately  serious  incom- 
patibilities developed.  However,  union  between  members  of  different  orders 
(urodeles  and  anurans)  did  not  succeed  for  longer  than  one  or  two  days. 

When  thus  heterotransplantations  between  nearly  related  species  succeed 
well,  this  does  not  necessarily  mean  that  heterodifferentials  do  not  exist  in 
their  tissues,  but  merely  that  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  against  the  strange 
organismal  differentials  does  not  preclude  a  successful  transplantation.  How- 
ever, if  the  conditions  under  which  such  heterotransplantations  take  place 
are  less  favorable,  then  the  existence  of  incompatibilities  between  the  heterog- 
enous organisms  may  become  manifest.  Hence,  while  the  parabiosis-like 
union  between  different  species  of  Rana  could  be  readily  accomplished,  ex- 
change of  pieces  of  skin  between  the  larvae  of  different  species  of  Rana  did 
not  succeed;  within  a  few  days  the  grafts  became  smaller  and  then  disap- 
peared. As  for  the  raising  of  such  combinations  of  embryos  to  a  stage  further 
than  metamorphosis,  Born  succeeded  only  in  the  case  of  homoiogenous  graft- 
ing of  embryos  of  Rana  esculenta.  He  did  not  succeed  in  reaching  this  stage 
with  heterogenous  combinations,  although  in  other  respects,  as  noted  above, 
heterotransplantations  between  nearly  related  species  behaved  about  like 
homoiotransplantations. 

The  experiments  of  Born  were  continued  by  Harrison,  who  in  one  instance 
kept  alive  a  heterogenous  combination  (Rana  virescens  and  Rana  palustris) 
through  the  period  of  metamorphosis  and  was  able  to  observe  that  each  of  the 
two  constituents  in  this  combination  retained  its  characteristic  species  features. 
But  the  size  of  a  whole  animal  of  this  kind  was  much  smaller  than  that  of  a 
normal  frog.  In  general,  such  heterogenous  combinations,  although  able  to 
eat  and  shift  for  themselves,  became  weak  in  the  course  of  time,  they  de- 
creased considerably  in  size  and  finally  died ;  at  most,  they  could  be  kept  alive 
for  three  or  four  months,  while  in  Born's  experiments  similar  heterotrans- 
plantations succeeded  only  for  a  period  of  three  weeks.  But  even  in  Harrison's 
experiments  atrophy  and  degeneration  in  the  large  majority  of  cases  set  in 
after  a  few  weeks.  This  investigator  also  observed  that  if  a  tail  had  been 
grafted  to  an  individual  of  a  different  species,  there  was  noticeable  an  early 
interference  not  only  with  the  growth,  but  also  with  the  life  of  the  grafted 
tail,  parts  of  which,  however,  could  remain  viable  for  a  longer  time. 

Harrison  furthermore  noted  that  in  some  instances  reciprocal  transplanta- 
tions behaved  in  an  unlike  manner,  an  effect  which  has  been  found  also  in 
other  kinds  of  transplantations  and  to  which  we  have  previously  referred.  Of 
interest  also  is  his  observation  that  the  lateral  organs  of  one  partner  could 
grow  into  the  other,  although  the  partners  belonged  to  different  species,  as 
happened  when  the  tail  portion  of  Rana  palustris  was  joined  to  the  anterior 
part  of  Rana  sylvatica;  in  this  case  the  lateral  line  organs  extended  from 
Rana  palustris  into  Rana  sylvatica.  Evidently  there  was  here  no  very  marked 
incompatibility  between  parts  of  organs  possessing,  each  one,  its  own  species 
differential ;  if  antagonistic  reactions  did  occur  under  these  conditions,  they 


INDIVIDUALITY  OF  EMBRYONAL  TISSUES  237 

were  presumably  of  a  subtle  nature  and  proceeded  more  slowly.  Even  indi- 
viduals belonging  to  different  genera  and  families  could  be  temporarily  joined 
together. 

On  the  whole,  these  experiments  bear  certain  similarities  to  mammalian 
parabiosis;  apparently  heterotoxins  are  active  in  both.  Inasmuch  as  in  these 
transplantations  of  parts  of  embryos  we  have  to  deal,  not  with  the  peculiarities 
of  some  of  their  constituent  tissues  or  organs,  but  with  conditions  common 
to  all  the  tissues,  which  are  affected  the  more  unfavorably  the  greater  the 
distance  in  relationship  between  the  two  partners,  we  are  justified  in  attribut- 
ing the  incompatibilities  which  may  develop  between  them  to  differences  in 
their  organismal  differentials.  These  embryonal  organisms  show  a  sensitive- 
ness to  heterogenous  differentials  similar  to  that  noted  in  certain  invertebrates, 
as  for  instance,  the  lumbricidae;  in  both  cases  incompatibilities  arise  if  the 
species  of  the  partners  are  far  removed  from  each  other  phylogenetically.  The 
mutual  tolerance  of  heterogenous  constituents  seems  to  be  greater  in  the 
embryonal  than  in  the  adult  anuran  amphibia,  which  latter,  as  we  have  seen, 
are  on  the  whole  very  sensitive  to  the  effects  of  heterotransplantation.  We 
have  seen,  in  a  preceding  chapter,  that  in  adult  amphibia  restitution  processes 
are  restricted  to  the  appendages  of  urodeles.  On  the  other  hand,  in  amphibian 
larvae  of  Rana,  Harrison  has  shown  that  it  is  possible  to  obtain  furthergoing 
integrations.  When  pieces  of  tail  were  grafted  so  that  their  aboral  poles  were 
in  contact  with  the  oral  poles  of  the  host  and  the  oral  surfaces  of  the  grafts 
were  cut  off,  the  influence  of  the  larger  piece  induced  processes  of  adaptation 
in  the  grafts,  which  made  them  part  of  the  host.  In  this  respect  a  larva  of  an 
anuran  amphibian  resembles,  therefore,  a  hydrozoon  or  a  pianarian;  but  in 
other  respects  the  integrative  ability  of  these  larvae  is  much  less  pronounced 
than  that  of  the  more  primitive  adult  invertebrate  organisms.  As  a  rule,  in 
amphibian  larvae  abnormal  combinations  of  several  pieces  do  not  undergo 
those  various  regulative  processes  leading  to  the  reestablishment  of  normal 
individuals,  which  take  place  so  readily  in  primitive  adult  animals ;  the  larvae 
of  amphibia  correspond  in  this  respect  rather  to  adult  lumbricidae. 

II.  Transplantation  of  Embryos  and  Eggs  in  Invertebrates.  The  experi- 
ments of  Born  in  amphibia  were  soon  afterwards  extended  to  invertebrates. 
It  is  especially  the  eggs  and  embryos  of  echinoderms,  of  Ascaris  and  Chae- 
topterus,  which  were  used  in  these  investigations,  in  which  Driesch,  Morgan, 
zur  Strassen,  Jacques  Loeb,  de  Haan,  Goldfarb,  and  others  participated. 
Although  these  experiments  were  not  undertaken  primarily  for  the  sake  of 
the  study  of  organismal  differentials,  still  some  valuable  data  in  this  regard 
were  obtained. 

Two  cells  or  cell  complexes  may  be  joined  together  in  two  ways :  (a) 
Through  agglutination,  a  process  which  will  be  more  fully  discussed  in  a 
later  chapter,  dealing  with  tissue  formation  and  organismal  differentials ;  (b) 
through  coalescence  of  agglutinated  cells,  due  to  solution  processes  which 
take  place  in  the  ectoplasmic  cell-layer,  especially  of  eggs  or  their  very  early 
cleavage  stages.  If  the  union  consists  merely  in  an  agglutination  process,  sev- 
eral further  possibilities  exist.  Either  the  two  organisms  remain  distinct  and 


238  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

develop  as  separate  embryos,  or  they  become  secondarily  integrated  into  a 
single  organism  through  the  action  of  regulating  mechanisms,— presumably 
similar  to  those  which  are  effective  as  contact  and  distance  substances, — on 
cells  derived  from  the  same  embryo,  and  then  an  orderly  development  may  fol- 
low. In  addition  there  may  be  observed  certain  intermediate  conditions  in 
which  the  greater  parts  of  the  two  embryonal  structures  remain  distinct,  but 
some  organs  unite  and  become  common  to  both  organisms.  Furthermore,  under 
certain  conditions  the  joined  organisms  may  separate  again  secondarily,  the  re- 
sult of  a  process  which  may  be  designated  as  disagglutination.  Structures  rep- 
resenting various  stages  of  embryonal  development  can  thus  be  united,  un- 
fertilized or  fertilized  eggs  as  well  as  early  cleavage  stages  up  to  blastulae,  and 
perhaps  even  still  farther  advanced  embryos. 

If  two  embryos  have  in  this  way  been  joined  together  by  means  of  agglu- 
tination into  a  single  organism,  giant  individuals  may  develop,  in  which  the 
number  of  cells  composing  the  embryo  is  approximately  doubled,  but  in  which 
the  size  of  the  cells  remains  unchanged.  However,  in  other  cases  in  which, 
at  a  very  early  stage,  coalescence  takes  place  between  the  two  partners,  an 
organism  with  the  same  number  but  with  double  the  size  of  cells  results. 
Under  certain  conditions  it  may  happen  that  one  of  the  two  organisms 
becomes  atrophic  and  then  the  remaining  parts  of  it  may  be  dominated  by 
the  larger  partner.  Such  a  dominance  of  a  larger  over  a  smaller  partner  has 
been  noticed  repeatedly  in  cases  of  transplantation  in  lower  invertebrates,  as 
well  as  in  parabiosis  in  mammals.  Whether  the  two  embryos  will  form  one 
single  organism  or  separate  into  two  organisms  depends  upon  several  factors : 
(1)  The  degree  of  development  of  the  embryos  and  the  rigidity  of  their  tissue 
and  organ  differentials  at  the  time  of  union ;  in  general,  the  further  the 
embryonal  development  has  progressed,  the  more  the  original  plasticity  of 
tissues  and  organs  has  been  lost,  the  less  will  be  the  chance  that  one  single 
individual  will  result  from  the  union.  (2)  The  orientation  of  the  two  surfaces 
which  unite  the  two  partners;  if  this  orientation  is  favorable  then  the  union, 
whether  by  means  of  agglutination  or  of  coalescence,  can  be  more  readily 
accomplished  and  a  secondary  separation  becomes  more  improbable.  This 
conclusion  agrees  with  observations  in  lower  adult  invertebrates,  where  the 
covering  of  wound  surfaces  in  the  right  orientation  prevents  regeneration  at 
the  cut  ends,  but  where  the  joining  together  of  two  unsuitable  poles  may 
lead  to  budding  or  regenerative  outgrowth  and  subsequent  separation  of  the 
component  parts.  It  agrees  in  general  also  with  the  changes  which  take  place 
at  the  point  of  union  between  tissues  in  higher  animals,  where  certain  contact 
differentials  determine  whether  a  stable  or  an  unstable  equilibrium  will  be 
reached.  (3)  The  result  also  depends  upon  the  organismal  differentials  of  the 
two  partners.  Syngenesious  and  homoiogenous  combinations  apparently  suc- 
ceed. However,  in  many  cases  it  is  impossible  from  the  reports  of  the  investi- 
gators to  determine  whether,  in  a  certain  experiment,  a  syngenesio-  or  a 
homoiotransplantation  was  carried  out,  and  we  can  therefore  not  be  sure 
whether  any  difference  existed  between  the  results  of  these  two  types  of 
transplantation;  but  some  investigators,  and  in  particular  Bierens  de  Haan, 


INDIVIDUALITY  OF  EMBRYONAL  TISSUES  239 

have  given  consideration  to  the  influence  of  organismal  differentials  in  their 
transplantations. 

More  definite  is  the  difference  in  effects  which  is  seen  between  homoio- 
and  heterotransplantation.  After  the  latter,  there  may  take  place  neither  a 
primary  nor  a  secondary  unification  of  the  two  organisms.  The  incompati- 
bility may  manifest  itself  at  the  surfaces  where  the  organisms  are  joined 
together  and  thus  a  separation,  due  to  disagglutination,  may  occur  after 
apparently  a  primary  union  of  the  organisms  had  taken  place.  If  we  unite  two 
distant  species,  either  this  latter  process  occurs  or  there  may  be  from  the 
beginning  a  lack  of  union.  If,  however,  we  combine  more  nearly  related 
species,  the  two  organisms  may  remain  united  for  a  longer  period  of  time, 
but  secondarily  also  here  abnormalities  occur,  such  as  a  slowing-up  of  the 
developmental  processes,  until  they  cease  in  the  end  altogether.  In  still  other 
cases  more  localized  abnormalities  in  development  take  place,  affecting  either 
one  or  both  of  the  partners ;  or  on  the  other  hand,  disintegration  or  atrophy 
of  tissues  has  been  observed  and  at  last  one  partner  may  be  destroyed  or 
incorporated  into  the  dominating  one.  In  these  instances  we  have,  therefore, 
presumably  to  deal  with  heterotoxins  injuring  especially  the  weaker  organism. 
However,  the  difficulties  experienced  in  transplantations  between  different 
species  may  depend  not  entirely  on  the  incompatibilities  between  the  organis- 
mal differentials  as  such,  but  also  on  secondary  factors  of  a  less  specific 
character,  such  as  differences  in  the  size  and  rate  of  development  of  the  two 
partners;  factors  of  this  kind  may  determine  the  readiness  with  which  two 
relatively  nearly  related  species  can  be  joined  together. 

Of  great  interest  is  the  observation  that  in  heterotransplantation,  if  a  part 
of  one  of  the  two  component  organisms  disintegrates,  the  remaining  part  of 
this  organism  may  be  changed  in  its  development  under  the  influence  of  cer- 
tain organs  of  the  other  partner,  which  has  now  become  the  dominating  factor. 
Thus,  a  line  of  ciliated  cells  may  form  in  the  injured  component  of  the  com- 
bination, when  similar  developmental  processes  take  place  in  the  dominating 
component.  In  such  a  case  we  have  apparently  to  deal  with  an  organizer  action 
similar  to  those  actions  which  are  potent  during  the  normal  development  of 
embryos,  or  which  may  be  produced  experimentally  through  implantation 
of  certain  specific  parts  of  another  embryo,  which  function  as  organizers. 
Evidently  the  presence  of  heterodifferentials  does  not  necessarily  prevent 
organizer  action. 

We  see,  then,  that  in  the  case  of  invertebrate  embryos  a  distinct  sensitive- 
ness to  heterogenous  organismal  differentials  exists,  while  a  like  sensitiveness 
to  homoiogenous  organismal  differentials  is  apparently  lacking,  and  in  this 
respect  eggs  and  embryos  behave  in  a  similar  way  to  parts  of  adult  inverte- 
brates when  they  are  joined  together.  However,  as  stated  above,  it  may  be  that 
what  has  been  interpreted  in  these  experiments  as  homoiotransplantations, 
really  represented  syngenesiotransplantations,  since  this  distinction  was  not 
always  made  by  the  investigator. 

We  shall  cite  a  few  experiments  which  will  illustrate  some  of  the  general 
conclusions  at  which  we  have  arrived  and  which  will  bring  out  some  addi- 


240  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tional  points  of  interest.  In  certain  instances  ova  were  joined  together  and 
agglutinated  with  each  other,  as  in  the  experiments  of  de  Haan  and  zur  Stras- 
sen;  in  others,  early  embryonal  stages  were  combined  (Driesch,  Goldfarb). 

Driesch  united  two  blastulae  of  Echinidae  and  observed  that  they  were  able 
to  form  one  organism  with  twice  the  number  of  cells,  but  the  individual  cells 
did  not  coalesce.  A  single  organism  developed  presumably  if  contact  mecha- 
nisms or  contact  substances  acting  as  regulators  were  favorable  to  such  a 
union ;  otherwise,  separate  organisms  resulted.  Apparently  the  stage  at  which 
the  joining  together  of  the  component  parts  took  place  and  the  size  of  the 
surfaces  which  agglutinated  (Goldfarb),  and  probably  also  the  degree  of 
specificity  of  tissue  and  organ  differentials,  determined  the  outcome  of  the 
operation.  The  further  the  differentiation  had  progressed,  the  more  pro- 
nounced was  the  tendency  on  the  part  of  the  partners  to  separate  again  and 
to  give  origin  to  two  distinct  organisms.  If  one  organism  had  been  produced, 
the  inner  organs  appeared  to  be  double  or  they  had  united  into  single  organs. 
In  some  cases  two  larvae  formed,  which  had  certain  organs,  such  as  gut, 
skeleton  or  body  cavity,  in  common,  while  in  other  cases  these  organs  re- 
mained separate.  When  one  partner  dominated,  as  so  often  occurs  in  mam- 
malian parabiosis,  distintegration  of  the  skeleton  could  take  place  in  the 
weaker  partner,  and  as  a  result  of  such  degenerative  processes  a  single  larva 
developed,  in  which  the  gut  of  the  dominant  larva  supplied  the  remnants  of 
the  other  partner  with  food ;  furthermore,  it  was  observed  that  even  mesen- 
chyme cells  could  move  from  one  larva  into  the  other.  Agglutination  was,  in 
these  experiments,  preliminary  to  coalescence  and  we  may  assume  that  it  took 
place  readily  if  the  consistency  of  the  cells  was  suitable  for  this  process. 
According  to  Herbst  and  Driesch,  lack  of  Ca  and  a  certain  degree  of  alka- 
linity or  low  temperature  in  the  surrounding  medium  caused  stickiness  and 
favored  agglutination  of  the  cell  surfaces.  In  Driesch's  experiments  it  is  not 
indicated  whether  he  had  to  deal  with  syngenesious  or  homoiogenous  relations 
between  the  partners ;  but  in  Goldfarb's  experiments,  both  syngenesious  and 
homoiogenous  unions  succeeded.  In  the  investigations  of  Morgan  in  Echini- 
dae, parts  of  brothers  were  successfully  joined  together  in  syngenesious 
transplantations.  He  observed  that  processes  of  degeneration  or  atrophy  in 
one  of  the  partners  could  precede  the  transformation  of  the  combination  into 
a  single  larva,  but  there  were  also  found  all  transitions  between  a  single 
homoiogenous  organism  and  double  organisms.  Goldfarb,  as  well  as  Bierens 
de  Haan,  showed  in  Echinidae  that  as  many  as  forty  eggs  could  be  made  to 
agglutinate  with  one  another,  but  that  a  combination  of  more  than  two  eggs 
rarely  developed  beyond  an  early  embryonal  stage.  Thus  an  incompatibility 
became  noticeable,  comparable  to  that  observed  in  transplantation  of  primitive 
adult  invertebrate  organisms,  where  likewise  the  difficulty  in  the  integration 
of  the  parts  into  one  whole  seemed  to  increase  the  more  the  greater  the  number 
of  pieces  which  were  joined  together. 

Of  general  interest  are  also  the  experiments  of  zur  Strassen,  who  showed 
that  in  Ascaris  two  unfertilized  eggs  could  coalesce,  and  that  there  was  present 


INDIVIDUALITY  OF  EMBRYONAL  TISSUES  241 

under  these  conditions  a  double  set  of  chromosomes  as  well  as  twice  the 
amount  of  egg  substances.  Such  eggs  could  then  be  fertilized  and  could  de- 
velop into  one  individual.  In  case  two  already  fertilized  eggs  were  united,  the 
two  female  and  also  the  two  male  nuclei,  respectively,  united  with  each  other, 
and  either  twins  or  single  embryos  resulted  from  such  combinations.  If,  instead 
of  eggs,  early  embryonal  stages  were  combined,  they  tended  to  agglutinate 
rather  than  to  undergo  coalescence,  the  protoplasm  of  the  individual  cells 
remaining  separate.  However,  the  direction  of  the  axes  of  the  two  organisms 
was  found  to  be  of  significance;  if  there  was  correspondence  of  direction, 
one  complete  organism  developed,  otherwise  two  separate  individuals.  In 
general,  the  two  factors  which  above  all  others  seem  to  be  of  importance  in 
such  combinations  and  which  determine  whether  one  or  two  organisms  shall 
be  formed  from  two  young  embryos  are :  (1)  The  developmental  stages  of  the 
embryonal  structures,  and  (2)  the  direction  of  the  axes  of  the  organisms. 

As  to  the  effects  of  the  organismal  differentials,  Bierens  de  Haan  found 
that  different  combinations  succeeded  unequally  well,  it  being  easier  to  unite 
certain  species  than  others.  Heterogenous  fusions  succeeded  only  rarely,  and 
if  they  did  succeed,  the  resulting  fusion  was  less  complete.  In  this  case  there 
was  a  chance  for  a  secondary  separation  of  the  partners,  similar  to  the  separa- 
tion which  had  been  observed  if  two  more  distant  species  were  joined  together 
in  primitive  invertebrate  adult  organisms  and  in  amphibian  embryos.  Separa- 
tion could  still  occur  as  late  as  after  eighteen  hours ;  but  if  in  other  cases  these 
heterogenous  combinations  developed,  the  development  was  not  quite  typical 
and  it  was  slower  than  normal.  Unified,  single  giant  plutei  never  resulted  from 
such  heterogenous  unions.  Some  combinations  of  this  kind,  however,  succeeded 
better  than  others  and  in  these  successful  experiments  the  intestines  were  seen 
to  grow  from  one  into  the  other  partner.  But  even  in  relatively  successful 
heterogenous  transplantations,  such  as  those  between  Parechinus  and  Para- 
centrotus,  the  organ  formation  was  rudimentary  and  development  soon  ceased ; 
perhaps  substances  which  were  produced  as  the  result  of  incompatibilities 
between  the  two  organisms  acted  as  poisons.  In  a  combination  between  Pare- 
chinus and  Paracentrotus  the  dominant  Parechinus  could  call  forth  the  de- 
velopment of  a  line  of  cilia  at  the  expense  of  the  rudimentary  Paracentrotus, 
and  in  this  case  parts  of  the  skeleton  seemed  to  act  as  organizers.  In  general 
it  was  found  that  heterogenous  combinations  never  led  to  the  formation  of 
really  uniform  organisms,  but  that  at  best  merely  sectorial  chimaerae  were 
produced.  Under  the  most  favorable  conditions  each  component  of  these  com- 
binations could  develop  to  the  stage  of  a  normal  pluteus,  otherwise  regulative 
processes  occurred  which  led  to  separation ;  in  other  cases,  both  heterogenous 
partners  became  sickly.  As  far  as  unfertilized  ova  are  concerned,  it  was  ob- 
served that  while  a  homoiogenous  union  could  be  accomplished,  heterogenous 
unions  did  not  succeed.  From  the  latter,  unified  single  giant  plutei  never 
formed;  in  some  instances  cytolysis,  in  others  a  temporary  agglutination  oc- 
curred, but  a  real  coalescence  did  not  take  place.  However,  even  twin  larvae 
which  developed  from  a  homoiogenous  union  often  showed  some  defects.  We 


242  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

must  therefore  consider  the  possibility  that  specific  toxic  substances  distinct 
from  the  organismal  differentials  were  responsible  for  some  of  the  results  fol- 
lowing heterogenous,  and  even  homoiogenous  combinations. 

When  we  review  this  entire  series  we  come  to  the  conclusion  that  there  is 
no  very  definite  gradation  noticeable  in  the  joining  together  of  different  in- 
dividuals, if  we  ascend  from  the  ontogenetically  lower  to  the  more  adult 
forms.  However,  there  develops  in  every  case  an  incompatibility  between 
farther  distant  heterogenous  parts  of  an  artificial  combination,  and  it  is  often 
noticeable  also  between  more  nearly  related  heterogenous  partners;  on  the 
other  hand,  there  is  usually  no  definite  incompatibility  between  homoiogenous 
partners,  although  even  here  some  abnormalities  may  be  found. 

However,  there  are  several  difficulties  in  interpreting  these  findings.  In  the 
first  place,  as  stated  above,  these  investigations  were  not  carried  out  with  a 
view  of  analyzing  the  organismal  differentials  and  therefore  the  experimental 
data  which  would  make  possible  such  an  analysis  are  very  incomplete.  Sys- 
tematic comparisons  between  auto-,  syngenesio-  and  homoiotransplantations 
were  in  no  case  made.  Secondly,  it  is  possible  that  in  some  instances  factors 
of  secondary  importance  came  into  play,  such  as  the  more  or  less  accidental 
differences  in  the  size  of  the  surfaces  which  were  to  be  joined  together. 
Thirdly,  there  are  some  indications  that  organ  differentiations  and  the  inter- 
actions of  organs  that  adjoined  each  other  played  a  definite  role  in  determin- 
ing compatibility;  this  is  suggested  by  the  importance  of  the  orientation  of 
the  surfaces  of  contact.  In  addition,  there  may  have  been  active,  specific 
toxic  actions,  which  were  referable  not  to  the  whole  organism  as  such  and  to 
its  organismal  differentials,  but  to  specific  metabolic  processes  of  certain 
organs,  and  which  were  comparable  to  the  toxins  produced  in  the  glands  of 
some  amphibia  and  reptiles. 

Notwithstanding  these  difficulties  of  interpretation,  there  is  very  little  doubt 
that  essentially  the  results  of  the  joining  together  of  two  ontogenetically 
primitive  organisms  depend  upon  the  compatibility  of  their  protoplasms,  and 
in  particular,  of  their  ectoplasmic  layers,  which  presumably  form  around 
wound  surfaces  of  cells.  But,  while  a  coalescence  takes  place  only  between 
homoiogenous  individuals,  or  possibly  between  individuals  belonging  to  very 
nearly  related  species,  the  primary  agglutination  process  seems  to  be  less 
specific,  although  specificity  is  not  lost  entirely.  Furthermore,  we  find  here, 
opposed  to  the  tendency  to  coalesce  and  to  form  one  unified  organism,  a 
tendency  towards  regeneration  and  the  development  of  two  distinct  organ- 
isms similar  to  that  which  we  observed  in  transplantations  among  phylo- 
genetically  primitive  organisms.  This  applies  especially  to  heterotransplanta- 
tions. The  more  suited  to  each  other  the  character  of  both  the  protoplasms 
and  the  surfaces  of  contact,  the  less  this  regenerative  tendency  will  assert 
itself.  Instead,  integrative  mechanisms,  which  tend  to  make  one  single  organ- 
ism out  of  the  two,  dominate.  While  it  is  impossible  to  form  a  definite 
concept  as  to  the  relative  importance  of  physical  and  chemical  factors  which 
may  assert  themselves  at  the  place  of  union,  still  it  is  evident  that  the  degree 
of   relationship   between   two   embryonal   organisms   is   one  of   the    factors 


INDIVIDUALITY  OF  EMBRYONAL  TISSUES  243 

which  helps  to  determine  the  compatibility  of  the  partners  in  experiments  in 
which  different  species  are  joined  together. 

There  is  reason  for  assuming  that  regulative  substances  of  a  similar 
character  to  those  present  in  the  morphogenic  interaction  between  parts  of 
a  natural  individual,  regulate  also  the  interaction  between  coalesced  and 
secondarily  unified  organisms.  This  tendency  to  form  more  or  less  normal 
individuals  out  of  abnormal  combinations  may  lead  to  the  production  of  a 
single  organism  from  two  partners,  or  to  the  later  separation  of  the  two 
joined-together  parts,  each  of  which  then  gives  origin  to  a  single  individual, 
or  to  the  domination  of  one  partner  over  the  other,  which  latter  undergoes 
various  degrees  of  degeneration.  These  observations  apply  both  to  trans- 
plantations in  phylogenetically  primitive  classes  of  animals  and  to  fusions 
of  early  ontogenetic  stages.  However,  notwithstanding  these  similarities,  one 
has  the  impression  that  the  regulative  and  integrative  mechanisms,  which 
are  so  pronounced  in  the  case  of  the  phylogenetically  most  primitive  adult 
organisms,  are  perhaps  not  effective  to  quite  the  same  degree  in  embryonal 
forms  of  phylogenetically  more  advanced  organisms,  although  here,  also, 
various  fargoing  regulations  may  take  place.  The  typical  organizer  actions 
which  may  be  observed  in  transplantation  of  very  primitive  adult  organisms, 
and  which  are  so  important  during  embryonal  development,  are  only  very 
rarely  evident  under  the  conditions  prevailing  in  these  combinations  between 
ontogenetically  primitive  organisms. 

In  experiments  with  eggs  and  young  embryos  we  have  not  to  deal  with  the 
same  organismal  differentials  which  are  active  in  adult  organisms.  There 
are  indications  that  neither  the  specific  organismal  differentials  which  charac- 
terize the  adult  individual,  nor  the  mechanisms  which  react  against  strange 
differentials  are  as  yet  fully  developed ;  still,  protoplasmic  specificities  which 
distinguish  different  species  evidently  exist  even  in  such  ontogenetically  early 
forms.  Some  of  these  specificities  presumably  represent  stages  in  the  develop- 
ment of  the  organismal  differentials  and  their  means  of  manifestation,  and 
all  intermediate  gradations  between  the  precursors  present  in  the  fertilized 
egg  and  the  fully  formed  substances  and  mechanisms  in  the  adult  form  may 
be  found.  Furthermore,  as  in  phylogeny,  so  also  in  ontogeny  there  is  notice- 
able an  inverse  parallelism  between  the  degree  of  plasticity  of  organs  and  of 
the  integrative  potentialities  active  in  an  organism,  on  the  one  hand,  and  the 
the  degree  of  development  of  the  organismal  differentials,  on  the  other  hand. 


Chapter  4. 

The  Significance  of  Organismal  Differentials  in 

the  Transplantation  of  Pieces  of  Embryonal 

Tissue  into  Embryos  and  into  Adult 

Organisms 

In  the  preceding  chapter  we  have  discussed  transplantation  of  parts  of 
organisms,  each  of  which  had  the  ability  to  live  and  develop  inde- 
pendently, in  invertebrate  and  amphibian  embryos.  We  shall  now  con- 
sider experiments  in  which  smaller  pieces  of  tissue,  which  under  ordinary 
conditions  are  not  able  to  live  separately  or  to  develop,  were  grafted  into 
embryos  or  into  adult  individuals.  Transplantations  of  this  kind  in  amphibia 
have  been  used,  especially  by  Spemann  and  his  associates,  in  the  study  of  the 
effects  of  organizers  and  their  role  in  embryonal  development.  This  motive 
rather  than  the  intention  of  analyzing  organismal  differentials  dominated  a 
large  series  of  such  experiments.  We  shall  analyze  first,  transplantations  which 
were  undertaken  previous  to  the  full  development  of  the  organizer  concept, 
and  then  in  a  subsequent  chapter  we  shall  discuss  transplantations  which 
were  carried  out  with  the  problem  of  organizers  in  view,  as  far  as  such 
experiments  are  of  interest  in  the  analysis  of  individuality. 

The  experiments  of  Lewis,  Filatov  and  others,  have  shown  that  homoio- 
as  well  as  heterotransplantation  of  skin  can  be  readily  carried  out  in  amphibian 
larvae,  and  that  in  contact  with  the  optic  disc  the  transplant  in  either  case  is 
able  to  produce  the  lens  of  the  eye.  But  the  conditions  under  which  the 
formation  of  the  lens  takes  place  vary  in  different  species.  In  some  species, 
such  as  Rana  fusca,  the  skin  from  all  regions  of  the  organism  retains  up  to  a 
relatively  late  stage  of  development  the  ability  to  produce  the  lens  in  contact 
with  the  optic  vesicle.  In  Rana  esculenta,  on  the  other  hand,  only  the  skin 
of  the  eye  region  is  able  to  form  the  lens,  though  the  transformation  of  the 
epithelium  of  the  skin  into  lens  apparently  proceeds,  through  self-differentia- 
tion, independently  of  a  previous  contact  with  the  optic  disc.  Skin  from  other 
areas  is  not  able  to  produce  lens  in  this  species,  but  the  optic  disc  has  the 
same  power  to  act  as  an  organizer  in  contact  with  epidermis  as  that  of  other 
species.  Bombinator  behaves  in  a  somewhat  intermediate  manner;  certain 
areas  of  skin  are  able  to  produce  lens  tissue  without  contact  with  the  eye 
vesicle,  but  the  optic  vesicle  also  has  the  power  to  induce  lens  formation  in 
skin  with  which  it  is  in  contact.  We  have  to  deal  in  these  cases  probably  with 
differences  of  a  quantitative  kind,  and  they  seem  to  depend  upon  the  stage 
of  differentiation  which  the  skin  of  the  various  species  has  attained  at  certain 
periods.  In  principle,  there  exists  in  all  these  species  the  potentiality  of  inde- 

244 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  245 

pendent  transformation  of  skin  into  lens  tissues,  as  well  as  the  production 
of  lens  under  the  influence  of  the  eye  vesicle. 

As  to  the  length  of  time  during  which  such  homoio-  and  heterotransplants 
of  skin  remain  alive,  no  systematic  studies  seem  to  have  been  made.  However, 
that  the  heterodifferential  may  after  all  assert  itself  is  indicated  by  the 
experiments  of  Filatov,  in  which  larval  skin  of  Bufo  was  grafted  over  the 
eye  of  Rana  esculenta.  The  lens  developed  from  the  transplant  but  subse- 
quently it  degenerated.  Perhaps  a  certain  length  of  time  was  required  for  the 
cumulative  action  of  the  heterodifferential  to  become  apparent. 

Somewhat  analogous  conditions  exist  also  in  other  instances.  Thus,  Ekman 
found  that  in  larvae  of  Bombinator  the  ectoderm  from  the  heart  and  kidney 
regions,  but  not  from  other  parts  of  the  body,  if  transplanted  to  the  gill  region 
is  able  to  produce  gills.  There  appears  to  exist  a  varying  degree  of  rigidity 
of  the  tissue  differentials  in  analogous  tissues  at  corresponding  periods  of 
embryonal  development  in  different  species,  and  in  addition,  the  tissue  or 
organ  differentials  may  be  specialized  to  a  different  degree  in  different  areas 
of  the  same  individual. 

Whether  these  differences  in  the  degree  of  plasticity  of  the  skin  are  in  any 
way  related  to  its  transplantability  and  sensitiveness  to  strange  organismal 
differentials  seems  not  to  have  been  determined.  But  it  is  quite  obvious  from 
these  investigations  that  the  tissue  differentials  may  be  graded  in  a  much 
finer  way  than  is  apparent  from  the  manifest  structural  characteristics  of  the 
tissues.  That  this  is  true  also  of  tissues  of  the  adult  organism  follows,  for 
instance,  from  our  studies  of  the  varying  ability  of  connective  tissue  in  dif- 
ferent parts  of  the  sex  tract  to  produce  placenta. 

In  general,  evidence  is  lacking  that  in  transplantation  in  amphibian  larvae 
the  individuality  differential  plays  any  particular  role.  In  urodele,  as  well  as 
in  anuran  larvae,  skin,  extremities,  tailbuds,  eyes  and  other  organs  can  be 
readily  homoiotransplanted.  However,  under  certain  conditions  individuality 
differentials  may,  after  all,  produce  a  certain  effect ;  thus,  according  to  Hell- 
mich,  in  anuran  larvae  a  homoiotransplanted  limb  may  heal  in,  but  subse- 
quently the  transplant,  ceasing  to  grow,  shrinks  and  becomes  necrotic.  Other 
effects  of  the  individuality  differential  on  transplantation  in  anuran  larvae 
will  be  discussed  later. 

In  urodele  larvae  heterotransplantation  succeeds  more  readily  than  in 
anuran  larvae.  For  instance,  between  Amblystoma  punctatum  and  Amblys- 
toma  tigrinum  extremities  can  be  readily  exchanged.  Likewise,  transplantation 
of  extremities  from  larvae  of  Triton  taeniatus  to  Salamandra  maculata,  and 
other  similar  heterotransplantations,  may  be  successful.  However,  this  is  true 
only  of  transplantations  in  larvae.  In  metamorphosed  urodeles,  even  after 
autotransplantation  the  transplanted  limbs  are  readily  cast  off,  an  effect  which 
must  be  due,  however,  to  other  factors  than  organismal  differentials.  Simi- 
larly when,  according  to  Detwiler,  autotransplantation  of  a  limb  in  larvae  of 
the  urodele  Amblystoma  succeeds  better  than  homoiotransplantation,  this 
difference  in  all  probability  does  not  arise  from  the  direct  injurious  influence 
of  strange  individuality  differentials  on  the  grafted  tissue,  but  from  secondary 


246  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

effects,  involved,  perhaps,  in  the  establishment  of  connections  between  the 
transplants  and  the  central  nervous  system. 

Graper  and  Alverdes,  on  the  other  hand,  find  that  transplantations  of  ex- 
tremity buds  from  larvae  of  Rana  palustris  to  Rana  sylvatica  succeed  only 
temporarily;  they  retrogress  within  four  to  five  weeks.  Similarly,  in  earlier 
experiments  Born  had  observed  that  transplantation  of  skin  from  larvae  of 
Bombinator  to  Rana  did  not  succeed  very  well.  Likewise,  Ekman  had  noticed 
that  after  exchange  of  gill  ectoderm  between  these  organisms  the  transplants 
were  soon  destroyed  or  cast  off.  Among  amphibian  larvae,  and  especially  also 
in  urodele  larvae,  the  transplantations  become  more  difficult  if  the  species 
used  are  more  distantly  related.  Thus,  Harrison  found  that  the  balancer 
anlage  can  be  readily  transplanted  from  Amblystoma  punctatum  to  Amblys- 
toma  tigrinum,  but  if  this  organ  is  grafted  from  Amblystoma  punctatum  to  a 
larva  of  Rana  sylvatica,  only  a  short  appendage  develops.  Similarly,  the 
induction  of  the  balancer  in  Triton  by  means  of  frog  material  gives  only 
doubtful  results  (Mangold).  An  ear  vesicle  transplanted  from  a  larva  of 
Rana  esculenta  to  Triton  taeniatus  remained  alive  at  most  for  twenty-nine 
days,  and  in  the  majority  of  cases  it  disappeared  even  earlier;  yet  the  trans- 
planted organ,  while  it  lived,  was  able  to  induce  the  formation  of  cartilage 
in  the  host  (Balinski).  In  the  tailbud  stage  of  Amblystoma  punctatum  and 
tigrinum,  pieces  of  spinal  cord  can  be  exchanged  between  these  two  species 
and  may  remain  alive,  the  brachial  plexus  growing  out  from  the  transplant 
into  the  host.  However,  subsequently  irregularities  do  develop ;  there  is  a 
greater  mortality  and  metamorphosis  does  not  take  place  in  the  bearers  of  the 
grafts  (Wieman  and  Nussman).  In  urodele  larvae  heterotransplants  from 
nearly  related  species  may  not  only  remain  alive,  but  the  tissues  from  both 
species  may  intermingle  with  each  other,  so  that  chimaerae  develop.  Thus 
Schaxel  grafted  parts  of  regenerative  blastemas  of  extremities  of  white 
axolotls  into  autogenous  blastemas  of  black  axolotls,  and  vice  versa. 
Although  these  tissues  differed  in  their  race  differentials,  they  could  be  mixed 
in  various  ways  without  any  resulting  incompatibilities. 

As  to  the  manner  in  which  unfavorable  heterodifferentials  may  in  the  course 
of  time  injure  the  transplant,  older  observations  of  Braus  gave  no  indica- 
tions of  differences  between  the  results  of  auto-  and  homoiotransplantations 
of  buds  of  extremities  in  anuran  larvae;  the  transplants  survived  even 
through  the  period  of  metamorphosis,  and  extremities  of  host  and  donor 
metamorphosed  at  the  same  time.  But,  transplantations  of  buds  of  Bombinator 
larvae  to  larvae  of  Rana  esculenta  were  only  temporarily  successful.  The 
transplants  began  to  develop  and  then,  when  a  certain  stage  had  been  reached, 
growth  and  development  ceased.  Growth  seems,  thus,  to  be  a  more  delicate 
indicator  of  incompatibility  of  organismal  differentials  than  the  life  of  the 
transplant;  the  former  may  stop  under  the  influence  of  injurious  factors 
of  a  heterogenous  nature  at  a  time  when  life  still  continues.  As  to  the  cause 
of  cessation  of  growth  at  a  certain  stage,  Braus  believes  that  the  critical  time 
coincides  with  the  period  when  the  circulation  is  established  in  the  host.  This 
would  suggest  that  heterotoxins  are  carried  from  the  host  to  the  transplant 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  247 

by  means  of  the  circulation.  However,  we  have  already  seen  that  incom- 
patibilities between  organismal  differentials  may  become  manifest  even  with- 
out injurious  effects  being  transmitted  through  the  blood.  In  Harrison's 
heterotransplantations  of  tails  of  anuran  amphibians,  atrophy  and  degenera- 
tion often  set  in  within  a  few  weeks  after  grafting,  although  some  parts  of  the 
transplant  could  survive.  But  it  is  possible  that  vascular  changes,  interfering 
with  the  circulation  of  the  blood,  and  caused  presumably  by  the  incompati- 
bility of  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  graft,  were  at  least  partly 
responsible  for  the  degenerative  conditions  that  occurred  in  the  experiments 
of  Braus. 

It  is  of  interest  to  compare  with  these  transplantations  of  small  pieces  the 
results  obtained  in  the  joining  together  of  larger  parts  of  larvae  of  Rana 
esculenta  and  Bombinator.  In  Born's  experiments  such  combinations  lived 
only  for  three  weeks,  but,  according  to  Braus,  they  may  persist  longer  under 
favorable  conditions.  It  seems,  then,  that  in  both  cases  after  heterotrans- 
plantation incompatibilities  developed,  which  caused  a  cessation  of  growth. 
We  may  conclude  that  certain,  not  well  defined,  growth  factors  may  be  potent 
even  in  heterotransplantations  between  amphibian  larvae,  and  that  the  sub- 
stances circulating  in  the  body  fluids  of  the  host  which  regulate  the  growth 
processes,  may  be  independent  of  organismal  differentials,  as  are  also  other 
growth-regulating  substances,  such  as  certain  hormones,  which  apparently 
do  not  carry  organismal  differentials.  As  in  the  case  of  tumors,  we  must  dis- 
tinguish from  these  hormone-like,  growth-regulating  substances,  other  growth- 
determining  factors  which  are  inherent  in  the  transplanted  tissue  itself,  and 
which  continue  to  assert  themselves  even  in  a  heterogenous  soil,  provided  the 
heterotransplantation  does  not  preclude  the  life  of  the  transplanted  tissues. 

As  to  the  relation  of  these  inherent  growth  substances  to  the  organismal 
differentials,  these  experiments  do  not  give  any  indication.  As  stated  above, 
between  Amblystoma  tigrinum  and  Amblystoma  punctatum,  limb,  and  also 
eye,  can  be  readily  exchanged,  and  both  of  these  organs  may  then  continue 
to  live.  Normally,  Amblystoma  tigrinum  reaches  a  greater  size  than  Amblys- 
toma punctatum  and  the  experiments  of  Twitty  and  Schwind  indicate  that  the 
transplanted  extremities  retain  essentially  the  characteristics,  as  to  growth 
energy,  of  the  species  or  race  from  which  they  are  derived.  This  may  per- 
haps be  due  to  the  fact  that  the  growth  factors  inherent  in  the  transplanted 
tissues  dominate  over  extraneous  growth  factors,  which  are  transmitted  to 
them  through  the  circulation  of  the  host.  Similarly,  Burns  and  Burns  found 
that  heterotransplantation  between  larvae  in  these  two  species  of  Amblystoma 
succeeds  if  young  stages  are  used  for  this  purpose,  and  that  under  these 
conditions  both  partners  retain  their  intrinsic  growth  momentum.  Likewise, 
the  specific  stimulus  to  metamorphosis  is  not  transmitted  from  one  partner 
to  the  other,  or  if  transmitted,  is  ineffective  in  these  transplantations,  but  the 
sexual  characters  of  one  partner  may  be  influenced  by  those  of  the  other. 
Also,  in  the  case  of  heterotransplantation  of  eyes  the  transplanted  organ 
retains  the  growth  energy  inherent  in  the  donor  tissues.  In  some  cases  the 
inherent  growth  energy  of  the  donor  tissue  may  be  the  deciding  factor  only 


248  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

in  the  first  period  of  transplantation,  while  subsequently  the  transplant  adapts 
itself  to  the  growth  rate  of  the  host;  this  was  observed  after  transplantation 
of  the  heart  primordium  from  Ambly stoma  tigrinum  to  Ambly stoma  punc- 
tatum;  moreover,  here  the  more  rapid  growth  of  the  transplant  in  the  first 
period  was  accopanied  by  a  more  rapid  differentiation. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  has  been  observed  by  Detwiler  that  when  parts  of 
spinal  cord  are  transplanted  from  Amblystoma  tigrinum  to  Amblystoma 
punctatum,  the  transplant  not  only  grows  better  than  the  corresponding 
organs  in  the  host  tissue,  but  even  better  than  the  non-transplanted  donor 
organ  in  Amblystoma  tigrinum.  Similar  observations  were  made  in  the  case 
of  limb  transplantations.  It  is  possible  that  in  this  instance  differences  in  the 
organismal  differentials  between  host  and  transplant  exerted  a  stimulating 
effect  on  the  graft.  However,  this  stimulation  of  growth  following  hetero- 
transplantation of  cord  tissue  again  applies  only  to  an  early  period;  subse- 
quently, an  adaptation  takes  place  between  the  size  of  the  transplant  and  the 
corresponding  organs  in  the  host.  The  experiments  of  Detwiller  regarding 
the  factors  regulating  the  growth  of  the  nervous  system  prove  that  the  out- 
growth of  nerves  was  not  determined  by  species-specific  substances. 

The  age  of  the  host  affects  the  transplant  in  a  characteristic  way.  If  an 
eye  of  a  young  organism  is  transplanted  to  an  older  host,  its  growth  is  accel- 
erated, so  that  its  stage  of  development  after  some  time  is  equal  to  that  of 
the  host,  while  an  older  eye,  having  attained  a  more  advanced  stage  of  de- 
velopment, after  transplantation  to  a  younger  host  grows  more  slowly,  so 
that  the  eye  of  the  host,  after  some  time,  reaches  the  same  stage  of  develop- 
ment as  the  transplant.  Twitty  explains  these  phenomena  on  the  basis  of 
Robb's  specific  partition  coefficients  for  foodstuffs  which  different  tissues 
possess,  a  theory  related  to  the  conception  of  athrepsia  of  Ehrlich.  However, 
if  differences  in  partition  co-efficients,  inherent  in  different  tissues  and  chang- 
ing in  accordance  with  the  ontogenetic  stage  of  development,  should  be 
responsible  for  these  results,  this  would  presumably  be  a  factor  of  only 
secondary  importance,  the  primary  factor  consisting  in  differences  in  the 
inherent  growth  energy  of  various  tissues,  upon  which  would  depend  the 
amount  of  foodstuffs  which  the  various  tissues  attract  and  use.  The  influence 
of  age  on  the  growth  energy  of  the  transplant  appears  to  be  similar  to  the 
effect  which  the  time  of  metamorphosis  has  on  the  growth  of  transplants  in 
urodele  larvae  and  which  will  be  discussed  later. 

In  these  more  primitive  organisms,  such  as  larvae  of  urodele  and  anuran 
amphibia,  there  is  some  indication  that  relatively  undifferentiated  cells  remain 
preserved  through  certain  periods  of  larval  life  and  that  it  is  these  cells 
which  in  ontogenetically  more  primitive  organisms  give  origin  to  a  blastema 
endowed  with  great  regenerative  potency.  The  presence  of  such  cells  would 
also  account  for  the  transformability  of  relatively  primitive  transplants  under 
the  influence  of  host  tissues  acting  as  organizers  in  a  certain  "action  field" 
of  the  host.  It  may  perhaps  be  assumed  that  in  urodeles  such  less  differentiated 
cells  remain  preserved  longer  than  in  anuran  larvae  and  in  this  way  the 
greater  regenerative  power  of  the  former  may  be  explained.  These  cells  are, 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  249 

as  Hellmich  points  out,  comparable  to  the  totipotent  cells  which  have  been 
found  in  sponges  (archeocytes),  hydrozoa  (interstitial  cells),  vermes  (neo- 
blasts),  and  tunicates  (amoebocytes).  Corresponding  to  the  relatively  un- 
differentiated character  of  such  cells,  their  organismal  differentials  are  pre- 
sumably also  as  yet  relatively  little  developed  and  they  can  therefore  be 
successfully  heterotransplanted,  while  this  is  impossible  in  ontogenetically 
further  developed  stages. 

However,  differences  in  the  degree  of  differentiation  of  the  organismal 
differentials  do  not  depend  merely  on  the  presence  or  lack  of  certain  un- 
differentiated cells,  which,  under  ordinary  circumstances,  remain  more  or 
less  dormant,  but  such  differences  must  also  exist  in  the  ordinary  tissues 
composing  an  embryo  or  a  larva  in  various  types  of  animals.  It  is  presumably 
due  to  this  inverse  parallelism  between  the  prospective  potency  of  embryonal 
tissues  and  the  degree  of  specificity  of  their  organismal  differentials,  that  in 
larvae  of  urodele  amphibia  extremities  can  be  successfully  homoiotransplanted 
under  conditions  which  make  such  a  result  impossible  in  anuran  larvae ; 
in  contrast  with  what  is  found  in  urodeles,  in  anuran  larvae  homoiotrans- 
planted extremities  placed  in  close  proximity  to  a  developing  extremity  of 
the  host  heal  in  only  temporarily;  they  then  cease  to  grow  and  undergo 
shrinking  and  necrosis.  But  so  far  a  systematic  comparison  of  auto-  and 
homoiotransplantation  of  limbs  has  not,  apparently,  been  undertaken,  and 
this  would  be  necessary  before  more  definite  statements  can  be  made  as  to 
the  development  of  organismal  differentials  in  these  embryos  and  as  to  the 
parallelism  between  the  degree  of  organ  and  tissue  differentiation  and  the 
fixity  of  the  organismal  differentials  during  different  stages  of  embryonal 
life. 

The  stage  of  differentiation  of  the  transplant  seems  to  influence  its  fate  in 
a  graded  way.  We  have  seen  that  fully  differentiated  extremities  of  amphibia 
cannot  be  successfully  transplanted  into  the  skin  or  subcutaneous  tissues. 
If  somewhat  younger  extremities  are  used,  only  the  less  differentiated  parts 
like  perichondrium  and  other  mesenchyme  cells  remain  alive,  become  a  part 
of  the  host  and  continue  to  differentiate.  Also,  after  transplantation  into  the 
interior  of  the  host  the  fully  differentiated  cells  die  and  only  the  less  dif- 
ferentiated cells  remain  alive.  However,  when  very  early  stages  of  extremity 
buds  are  transplanted,  although  no  further  development  takes  place,  necrosis 
does  not  occur  and  the  mesenchyme  cells  of  the  transplant  dissociate  from 
one  another  and  migrate  into  the  host  tissue  (Hellmich)  ;  but  in  other  cases, 
if  an  early  embryonal  bud  is  able  to  maintain  itself  in  the  host,  it  is  more 
accessible  to  the  organizer  action  of  the  surrounding  host  tissue  than  older 
tissues,  and  accordingly,  it  is  modified  in  its  development  by  the  host  tissue, 
whereas  somewhat  further  differentiated  transplants  develop  through  self- 
differentiation.  Correspondingly,  several  authors  have  stated  that  in  trans- 
plantation of  avian  embryonal  tissues  the  results  are  not  favorable  if  very 
early  stages  are  used,  and  similarly,  Goetsch  has  observed  that  if  in  Hydra 
very  early  regenerative  buds  of  the  oral  region  are  transplanted  into  the 
lateral  zone  of  other  polyps,  the  transplants  are  resorbed,  whereas  older  re- 


250  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

generative  tissues  can  develop  in  accordance  with  the  potentialities  of  the 
transplants.  It  seems,  then,  that  too  slight  a  differentiation  of  the  trans- 
planted tissue  favors  its  complete  adaptation  to  the  host  and  is  responsible  for 
the  lack  of  a  growth  momentum,  which  would  otherwise  have  led  the  trans- 
plant to  develop  in  its  own  way. 

We  shall  consider  transplantations  in  their  relations  to  organismal  and 
organ  differentials  still  further  in  the  following  chapter,  in  which  we  analyze 
organizer  actions  and  their  connection  with  organismal  differentials.  But  the 
data  which  we  have  already  discussed  lead  to  the  conclusion  that  the  outcome 
of  transplantations  in  amphibia  depends  primarily  upon  two  sets  of  consti- 
tutional factors,  namely,  (1)  the  phylogenetic  stage  of  development;  this,  in 
urodeles,  is  more  primitive,  the  precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials  are, 
as  yet,  less  differentiated  and,  therefore,  the  range  of  relationship  in  which 
transplantation  of  embryonal  material  succeeds  is  wider  than  it  is  in  anuran 
amphibia.  (2)  The  ontogenetic  stage  of  development  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials ;  the  genes  from  which  the  organismal  differentials  develop  are  fixed 
for  each  species  and  individual,  and  they  remain  unchanged  in  all  the  tissues 
throughout  embryonal  development.  In  contrast  to  this  fixity  of  the  genes,  the 
degree  of  differentiation  which  the  organismal  differentials  have  reached  in 
successive  stages  of  embryonal  development  differs;  the  greater  the  tissue 
and  organ  differentiation,  the  further  advanced  is  also  the  differentiation  of 
the  organismal  differentials,  and  correspondingly,  the  narrower  will  be  the 
range  of  relationship  within  which  the  transplantations  succeed.  Besides,  in  the 
same  embryonal  stage  different  tissues  and  cells  may  differ  as  to  the  degree 
of  differentiation  they  have  attained,  and,  correspondingly,  they  may  differ 
also  as  to  the  stage  of  transformation  of  the  gene-precursors  into  the  actual 
organismal  differentials,  which  are  localized  in  these  tissues.  Since  organismal 
and  also  organ  differentials  are  further  differentiated  and  more  fixed  in 
anuran  larvae  than  in  urodeles  at  corresponding  stages  of  embryonal  de- 
velopment, the  transplantability  of  the  former  will  be  less  than  that  of  the 
latter  at  any  given  period. 

Furthermore,  during  regenerative  newformation  of  limbs,  conditions  exist 
which  in  certain  respects  resemble  those  present  during  embryonal  develop- 
ment (Schaxel)  ;  a  graded  differentiation  of  the  regenerating  tissues  and  a 
corresponding  maturation  of  the  organismal  differentials  take  place.  There- 
fore, if  buds  of  extremities  representing  early  stages  of  regeneration  are 
transplanted,  they  may  give  origin  to  mixtures  of  various  tissues ;  but  if 
somewhat  later  stages  are  transplanted  the  tissues  are  fixed  in  their  poten- 
tialities and  in  the  localization  of  the  regenerating  material  and  under  these 
conditions  typical  limbs  develop.  The  great  plasticity  of  the  blastema  of  limb 
or  tail  of  an  amphibian  is  demonstrated  in  a  remarkable  experiment  of 
Schotte,  in  which  he  showed  that  after  transplantation  into  the  eye  of  frog 
larvae,  from  which  the  lens  had  previously  been  removed,  the  blastema 
changed  into  lens  tissue  under  the  influence  of  organizers  located  in  the 
eye  of  the  host. 

Durken  and  Kusche  diminished  the  effect  of  the  host  tissue  on  the  trans- 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  251 

plant  by  grafting  embryonal  tissues  into  the  eye  socket  of  amphibia  after 
its  contents  had  been  removed.  However,  even  under  these  conditions  the 
transplant  did  not  develop  as  a  mosaic,  but  underwent  various  irregular 
transformations  into  other  tissues,  presumably  under  the  influence  of  the 
host ;  thus  ectoderm  could  differentiate  here  into  neural  or  mesodermal  parts, 
in  contrast  with  what  happened  in  salt  solutions  in  vitro,  where  ectoderm 
merely  proliferated  and  formed  epidermis.  This  result  applied  to  tissues 
transplanted  at  early  stages  of  their  development;  if  farther  advanced  tissues 
were  used,  the  more  fixed  the  organ  differentials  were  at  the  time  of  trans- 
plantation, the  more  frequently  normal  organs  were  produced.  Diirken  called 
this  method  "interplantation" ;  it  represents  a  condition  intermediate  between 
the  ordinary  transplantation  and  tissue  culture  in  vitro.  Such  experiments 
were  carried  out  in  anurans  as  well  as  in  urodeles,  but  there  was  an  interest- 
ing difference  between  the  interplantation  in  the  anuran  Rana  and  the 
urodele  Triton,  in  the  former  the  homoiogenous  material  being  toxic  for 
the  host.  Such  toxic  effects,  consisting  in  hemorrhages  and  necrosis,  were  not 
observed  in  case  of  syngenesiotransplantation.  In  urodeles,  toxic  effects  were 
lacking.  It  is  noteworthy  that  in  these  experiments  individuals  were  apparently 
sensitive  to  toxic  substances  produced  in  their  own  species,  although  as  a 
rule  a  high  degree  of  immunity  exists  in  a  species  against  its  own  poisons. 
Kusche  could  successfully  interplant  early  embryonal  tissues  which  belonged 
to  different  genera  in  urodeles;  for  example,  Triton  cells  continued  to  dif- 
ferentiate after  transfer  into  larvae  of  Salamandra  and  Amblystoma;  but  if 
the  interplantation  took  place  between  different  orders,  such  as  between 
Triton  tissue  and  larvae  of  Rana  fusca,  or  between  cells  of  Amblystoma  and 
larvae  of  Hyla,  the  interplants  were  destroyed.  We  may  assume  that  under 
these  conditions  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  were  toxic  for  the  transplant, 
owing  to  the  divergence  between  the  organismal  differentials  in  host  and  graft. 

A  number  of  investigators,  beginning  with  Belogolowy,  transplanted  seg- 
mented eggs,  blastulae,  gastrulae  or  neurulae,  into  the  peritoneal  cavity  of 
adult  amphibia;  or  in  other  experiments  the  freshly  fertilized  eggs  of 
Axolotls  were  transplanted  into  larvae  of  the  same  kind,  measuring  13  to 
15  mm.  in  length.  The  transplants  were  able  in  certain  cases  to  undergo 
development,  but  this  was  abnormal,  even  after  homoiotransplantation.  How- 
ever, if  the  relationship  between  host  and  transplant  was  very  distant  the 
transplants  usually  died.  Belogolowy  did  not  observe  a  difference  between 
the  results  of  homoiotransplantations  and  transplantations  from  Rana  to 
Pelobates  and  vice  versa;  but  transplants  from  Rana  to  Triton  were  found 
alive  after  one  month  only  in  exceptional  cases. 

In  two  instances  Janda  observed  that  in  axolotls  fertilized  eggs,  when 
transplanted  to  the  peritoneal  cavity  of  the  same  species,  led,  after  three  or 
four  months,  to  the  development  of  embryonal  formations,  which  were  very 
incomplete  and  structurally  quite  abnormal.  Especially  prominent  in  these 
formations  were  epidermal  cysts,  masses  of  cartilage  and  nerve  tissue  pro- 
ducing cysts;  also,  intestinal  structures  with  glands  and  rudimentary  kidney 
and  eyes  were  found.  As  in  Diirken's  interplantations  into  the  eye  socket, 


252  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  surrounding  host  tissues  did  not  show  a  marked  activity.  However,  in 
the  majority  of  cases  the  implanted  material,  it  seems,  was  absorbed  without 
having  led  to  the  formation  of  these  embryomata. 

In  such  transplantations,  certain  substances  in  the  host  may  be  toxic  for 
the  transplant,  and,  conversely,  there  is  a  tendency  also  for  the  hosts  to  be 
injured  by  the  transplants  and  they  may  die  within  a  few  months.  The  toxic 
substances  in  the  peritoneal  cavity  were  found  by  A.  Weber  to  be  identical 
with  substances  present  in  the  blood  or  lymph.  Especially  the  eggs  of  Triton 
appear  to  be  killed  within  a  few  minutes  by  such  substances  in  an  adult 
Triton.  On  the  other  hand,  eggs  of  Bufo  and  Bombinator  develop  in  the 
peritoneal  cavity,  or  in  the  lymph  sacs  of  adult  animals  of  their  own  species, 
without  being  injured  by  toxins.  But  if  Triton  eggs,  which  would  have  died 
within  five  minutes  in  the  peritoneal  cavity  of  adult  Tritons,  are  transplanted 
into  the  lymph  sac  of  Bufo,  they  develop,  although  abnormally.  Anuran 
eggs  live  for  several  hours  in  the  peritoneal  cavity  of  Triton.  It  seems,  then, 
that  it  is  particularly  the  eggs  of  Triton  which  are  sensitive  to  these  toxic 
substances. 

It  is  not  sufficiently  clear  in  these  experiments  what  role  organismal  differ- 
entials may  play  in  producing  such  toxic  effects.  However,  according  to  Weber 
the  eggs  survive  longer  in  the  peritoneal  cavity  of  the  parents  than  in 
homoiogenous  individuals.  While  this  indicates  that  organismal  differentials 
may  in  some  way  be  concerned  in  these  processes,  it  is  probable  that 
essentially  we  have  in  these  experiments  to  deal  with  the  presence  of  special 
toxins,  distinct  from  the  heterodifferentials,  which  affect  injuriously  the 
transplants  after  ordinary  transplantations. 

Transplantation  of  avian  embryonal  tissues  into  adult  birds.  In  the  ma- 
jority of  experiments  avian  embryonal  tissues  were  homoiotransplanted  into 
the  subcutaneous  tissue,  muscle  of  the  chest,  peritoneal  cavity,  or  anterior 
chamber  of  the  eye  of  adult  birds  (Fere,  Wilms,  Tiesenhausen  and  Skubis- 
rewski).  One-day-old  embryos  were  not  found  suitable  for  transplantation; 
experiments  with  young  embryos,  about  five  days  old,  appeared  most  suc- 
cessful. The  gross  observation  indicated  that  in  the  majority  of  cases  the 
transplants  did  not  grow,  or  growth  disappeared  within  a  month  or  two.  In 
some  instances,  however,  masses  of  irregularly  arranged  embryonal  tissues, 
embryomata,  developed,  which  grew  to  larger  size  and  remained  alive  for  a 
year  or  more;  but  in  the  end  they  also  diminished  again  in  size  and  were 
absorbed.  Certain  tissues,  such  as  bone,  cartilage,  smooth  muscle  and 
squamous  epithelium,  were  especially  resistant.  There  was  apparently  no 
difference  between  the  results,  irrespective  of  whether  the  embryonal  material 
was  transplanted  into  the  mother  or  into  non-related  individuals  of  the  same 
species.  However,  considering  the  great  variability  in  the  results  obtained  in 
these  experiments,  definite  conclusions  cannot  be  drawn  as  to  the  effects 
of  the  relationship  between  transplant  and  host,  although  it  seems  that  hetero- 
transplantations, such  as  those  of  chick  embryo  to  duck  or  pigeon,  of  duck 
embryo  to  chicken  or  pigeon,  or  also  of  mammalian  embryo  to  chicken,  resulted 
in  an  early  degeneration  of  the  transplants. 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  253 

Transplantation  of  embryonal  material  into  the  allantoic  of  chick  embryos. 

The  first  transplantations  on  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  of  the  chick  were 
made  with  thin  pieces  of  mammalian  tumors,  and  these  experiments  indicated 
the  great  tolerance  for  heterogenous  tissues  which  this  organ  exhibits.  How- 
ever, the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  was  used  also  for  transplantation  of 
embryonal  material  and  a  survival  of  the  grafts  was  here  observed  when 
transplantation  into  the  adult  chicken  would  have  been  followed  by  the  rapid 
destruction  of  the  grafts.  Thus  Hoadley,  Murray  and  others,  found  that 
sense  organs  and  extremities  of  very  young,  one  or  a  few  days  old  chick 
embryos  develop  well,  although  apparently  not  always  quite  normally  or 
completely,  on  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  of  eight-  to  nine-day-old  chick 
embryos.  However,  the  time  during  which  the  transplants  continue  to  grow 
under  these  conditions  is  not  longer  than  about  nine  days ;  even  heterotrans- 
planted  tisue  can  develop  during  this  short  period.  Hiraiwa  and  Willier 
observed  that  parts  of  eleven-day-old  rat  embryos  grew  well  for  nine  days 
on  the  chorioallantoic  membrane  of  the  chick;  epidermis,  hair  follicles,  car- 
tilage and  bone,  were  used  and  grew  as  well  here  as  in  rat  embryos  of  the 
same  age,  but  the  entodermal  and  nerve  structures  did  not  continue  to  grow 
and  differentiate  in  this  strange  host,  or  at  least  they  developed  less  well.  The 
age  of  the  embryonal  graft  seems  to  influence  the  fate  of  the  transplant  to 
some  extent.  Sandstrom  noted  that  kidney  tissue  from  nine-day-old  duck 
embryos  healed  in  on  the  chick  chorio-allantoic  membrane  without  any  part 
of  it  becoming  necrotic.  Older  embryonal  kidney  tissue  underwent  partial 
necrosis  and  the  necrotic  areas  persisted  the  longer  in  the  host  the  older  the 
embryo  was  from  which  the  graft  was  taken;  moreover,  the  activity  of  host 
lymphocytes  also  increased  with  increasing  age  of  the  grafted  embryonal 
tissue. 

The  relatively  favorable  results  of  heterotransplantations  on  the  chorio- 
allantoic membrane  of  the  chick  are  probably  due  to  the  fact  that  the  defense 
mechanisms,  the  sensitiveness  to  strange  differentials  of  the  host,  and  the 
organismal  differentials,  factors  acting  in  combination  or  singly,  are  not  yet 
fully  developed  in  the  placental  structures  of  the  early  embryo. 

Inoculation  of  mammalian  embryonal  material  into  adult  mammals  of  the 
same  species.  Here  a  growth  may  take  place,  which  at  first  may  be  quite  rapid, 
but  which  then  slows  up,  comes  to  a  standstill,  and  finally  is  followed  by 
retrogressive  processes.  In  different  species  the  tendency  to  active  growth 
and  persistence  apparently  varies.  It  seems  to  be  very  great  in  the  rat,  where 
the  transplant  may  persist  for  months  and  even  a  year,  although  in  most 
cases  the  proliferation  may  continue  only  from  one  to  four  months,  when  a 
cessation  occurs  followed  by  retrogression.  The  period  of  growth  is  relatively 
brief  in  the  mouse,  retrogression  beginning  usually  after  one  week  (Rous). 
In  the  rabbit,  after  transplantation  into  the  uterus,  it  appears  that  only 
cartilage  survives  as  long  as  twenty  days  (Hammond).  However,  in  all  of 
these  experiments  with  homoiogenous  tissues  there  is  a  great  diversity  in  the 
results  in  different  experiments,  and  even  in  the  rat  it  is  only  in  exceptional 
animals  that  the  grafted  tissues  remain  active  for  very  long  periods.  It  is 


254  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

always  cartilage,  and,  to  a  lesser  extent,  bone,  osteoid  tissue  and  bone  mar- 
row, and  perhaps  also  smooth  muscle  tissue,  squamous  epithelium  with  its 
appendages,  the  hair  follicles  and  sebaceous  glands,  which  have  the  best 
chance  to  survive;  to  a  lesser  extent,  entodermal  (intestinal)  and  lymphoid 
tissue,  and  much  more  rarely,  nerve  tissue  and  rudimentary  formations  of 
sense  organs,  as  well  as  glands  such  as  liver,  may  be  found  in  these  embryo- 
mata. 

Mammalian  embryonal  tissues  give  evidence  of  possessing  species  differen- 
tials and,  consequently,  do  not  withstand  much  better  than  adult  tissues  the 
injurious  effects  of  heterotransplantation.  Thus  Rous  observed  that  embryonal 
tissue  of  the  mouse  may  grow  in  the  rat  for  a  few  days,  but  then  it  dies. 
However,  as  to  the  individuality  differential,  there  seems  to  be  less  selective- 
ness  here,  after  homoiotransplantation,  than  in  adult  tissues ;  but  this  may  be 
at  least  partly  due  to  the  fact  that  the  original  growth  momenium  is  greater 
in  embryonal  than  in  adult  tisues,  and  hence  the  former  may  be  carried 
over  some  of  the  difficulties  to  which  the  latter  succumb.  Yet  we  find,  also, 
in  transplantation  of  embryonal  tissues,  great  differences  in  the  results 
obtained  in  different  hosts  of  the  same  species.  This  indicates  that  individuality 
differentials  may,  after  all,  play  a  certain  role  in  determining  the  fate  likewise 
of  the  embryonal  grafts.  But  in  transplantation  of  mammalian  tissue  the 
age  and  developmental  stage  of  the  embryo,  too,  may  be  of  some  importance 
in  the  differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials;  in  very  early  stages 
even  species  differentials  are  not  yet  fully  developed. 

That  in  transplantations  of  both  normal  adult  and  embryonal  tissues  the 
genetic  relationship  between  transplant  and  host  is  a  very  essential  factor  in 
determining  the  outcome  is  further  indicated  by  the  fact  that  lymphocytic 
infiltration  takes  place  around  grafted  living  embryonal  tissue.  Two  weeks 
after  transplantation  of  embryonal  tissue  into  the  stomach  wall  of  rats, 
Askanazy  found  an  accumulation  of  lymphocytes  around  the  transplant,  and 
W.  P.  Neilson  noted  the  same  occurrence  more  recently  in  our  laboratory. 
However,  the  interpretation  of  these  observations  is  complicated  by  the 
fact  that  transplanted  embryonal  tissue  not  only  grows,  but  also  differentiates, 
and  thus  in  the  course  of  time  becomes  more  like  an  adult  tissue,  and  we 
cannot  therefore  be  certain  how  much  the  maturation  of  the  embryonal 
tissues  had  to  do  with  the  accumulation  of  lymphocytes. 

Rous,  in  making  two  grafts  of  the  same  embryonal  tissue  into  different 
places  in  the  same  host,  observed  that  both  transplants  behaved  in  the  same 
manner ;  either  both  did  well  or  both  retrogressed  at  an  early  date,  or  neither 
took,  a  finding  analogous  to  ours  in  the  case  of  tumors.  This  might  be  in- 
terpreted as  indicating  the  importance  of  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplants  in  determining  the  result.  But,  Rous  also  found  that 
mouse  tumor  tissue  and  mouse  embryonal  tissue  transplanted  simultaneously 
into  the  same  mouse  had  a  similar  fate.  Inasmuch  as  the  individuality  differ- 
entials of  the  embryonal  and  tumor  grafts  in  this  case  were  not  identical, 
it  appears  that  the  sensitiveness  and  intensity  of  the  reaction  of  a  host 
towards  strange  individuality  differentials  in  general  likewise  were  determin- 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  255 

ing  factors  in  these  experiments.  Similar  effects  may  be  observed  also  after 
homoiotransplantation  of  several  pieces  of  adult  mammalian  tissue  into  the 
same  host,  as  we  have  pointed  out  in  a  previous  chapter. 

In  a  relatively  small  number  of  experiments,  various  investigators  trans- 
planted embryonal  material  into  the  mother  from  which  the  embryo  had  been 
obtained ;  in  some  of  these  cases  pregnancy  continued,  while  in  others  it  was 
interrupted.  Freund  found  no  difference  in  the  rat  between  syngenesio- 
transplantation,  that  is,  grafting  of  the  embryo  to  its  own  mother,  designated 
by  this  author  as  autoplastic  transplantation,  and  homoiotransplantation, 
grafting  of  embryonal  tissue  to  a  strange  host;  but,  considering  the  wide 
range  of  variations  which  has  normally  been  found  after  homoiotransplanta- 
tion of  embryonal  material,  the  number  of  experiments  of  this  kind  was  not 
sufficiently  large  for  definite  conclusions.  In  contradistinction  to  Freund, 
Fichera  noted  that  in  rats  the  embryonal  transplants  persisted  longer  and 
more  tissues  developed  in  the  own  mother  than  in  homoiogenous  hosts.  A 
similar  result  was  obtained  by  Rous  in  the  mouse.  While  the  growth  of  the 
embryonal  material  was  not  more  rapid  in  the  mother  than  in  favorable 
homoiogenous  animals,  in  the  former  it  persisted  longer  and  led  to  the 
development  of  a  greater  variety  of  tissues.  Thus  it  seems  that  even  in  the 
case  of  embryonal  material  the  individuality  differential,  or  its  precursor, 
plays  a  certain  role.  Nicholas  attempted  to  transplant  embryonal  limb  or  eye 
from  brother  to  brother  in  the  uterus,  but  technical  difficulties  made  a  suc- 
cessful transplantation  only  exceptional,  and  the  effect  of  a  close  relationship 
between  host  and  transplant  in  these  experiments  remained,  therefore,  un- 
certain. Likewise,  reports  as  to  the  part  played  by  pregnancy  in  the  host  on 
the  fate  of  transplanted  embryonal  material  are  contradictory.  Freund  be- 
lieved that  such  tissue  grows  better  in  pregnant  than  in  non-pregnant  hosts. 
However,  according  to  Peyton  Rous,  in  the  mouse  pregnancy  inhibits  the 
growth  of  transplanted  embryonal  material  in  a  similar  manner  to  that  of 
tumor  transplants. 

Through  repeated  implantation  of  the  embryonal  tissue  a  relative  immunity 
against  the  growth  of  subsequently  inoculated  embryonal  tissue  can  readily 
be  demonstrated,  while  in  adult  tissue  such  an  immunity  cannot  be  recognized 
with  the  same  degree  of  definiteness.  Both  Peyton  Rous  and  F.  Fichera  noted 
the  development  of  this  type  of  immunity;  Rous  produced  a  relative  im- 
munity in  the  mouse  by  means  of  a  single  inoculation  of  homoiogenous 
embryonal  material,  while  Fichera  made  a  series  of  injections  of  embryonal 
rat  tissues  into  the  adult  rat;  after  each  additional  injection  the  immunity 
of  the  host  became  more  pronounced.  On  the  other  hand,  Paula  Freund 
noted  that  a  first  unsuccessful  subcutaneous  inoculation  of  embryonal  tissue 
in  the  rat  did  not  need  to  prevent  the  growth  of  a  second  intraperitoneal  graft. 
As  in  the  case  of  active  tumor  immunity,  we  have  not,  in  these  experiments 
with  embryonal  tissue,  to  deal  with  a  specific  immunity  to  the  particular 
homoiodifferential  of  the  tissue  which  was  used  for  immunization,  since  an 
immunity  to  all  embryonal  tissues  of  the  same  species  seem  to  have  resulted 
from  the  repeated  injections.  However,  there  is  still  the  possibility  that  in 


256  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

addition  to  this  general  reaction  against  homoiogenous  tissue,  a  specific  im- 
munity against  the  particular  individuality  differential,  which  was  used  as 
antigen,  may  also  have  developed. 

Rous  believes  that  this  acquired  immunity  manifests  itself  in  the  lack  of 
a  stroma  reaction  in  the  immunized  mouse  towards  the  transplant;  an  in- 
growth of  capillaries  and  connective  tissue  from  the  host  into  the  transplant 
does  not  take  place  and  the  transplant  dies  as  a  result  of  this  deficiency  in 
blood  supply.  A  lack  of  stroma  reaction  has  also  been  observed  by  Rous 
in  natural  immunity,  if  a  single  transplantation  of  embryonal  tissues  is 
made  into  an  unfavorable  host.  Rous  does  not  mention  the  appearance  of 
lymphocytes  around  the  transplants  in  the  immune  hosts.  A  similar  immune 
reaction  has  been  described  by  Russell  and  Bashford  in  the  case  of  grafted 
pieces  of  tumors,  a  mode  of  reaction  which  we  shall  discuss  in  a  subsequent 
chapter. 

If  we  wish  to  draw  definite  conclusions  concerning  the  relations  which 
exist  between  the  state  of  the  organismal  differentials  and  the  degree  of 
differentiation  and  fixity  of  organs  and  tissues  in  various  types  of  organisms, 
we  again  suffer  from  the  difficulty  that  transplantations  of  embryonal  ma- 
terial were  not  usually  undertaken  with  this  problem  in  mind.  However,  if 
allowance  is  made  for  a  certain  degree  of  inadequateness  in  the  data,  we 
may  conclude  that  the  range  of  transplantability  in  general  is  wider  in  the 
phylogenetically  more  primitive  classes  of  animals,  and  that  among  the  latter, 
in  particular,  it  is  wider  in  the  more  primitive  urodele  than  in  the  anuran 
amphibia ;  that  within  certain  limits  in  the  ontogenetically  earlier  stages  there 
is  found  both  a  lesser  degree  of  organ  and  tissue  differentiation  and  fixity 
and  a  lesser  differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  lastly,  that 
the  range  of  transplantability  decreases  with  advancing  embryonal  develop- 
ment and  differentiation.  Furthermore,  regenerating  tissues  in  adult  urodele 
amphibia  have  been  shown  to  behave  in  certain  respects  like  embryonal 
tissues;  and  corresponding  to  the  increasing  degree  of  organ  and  tissue 
differentiation,  which  is  attained  with  advancing  regeneration,  transplantabil- 
ity of  regenerating  tissues  likewise  decreases.  The  earlier,  less  differentiated 
tissues  are  still  more  plastic  and  amenable  to  environmental  factors,  while 
the  father  advanced  stages  in  embryonal  development  are  more  fixed  in  their 
organ  and  tissue  differentials  and  thus  have  a  greater  tendency  to  develop  by 
way  of  self-differentiation.  This  latter  conclusion  applies  also  to  the  regenerat- 
ing tissue  in  the  adult  urodele.  We  find  again,  therefore,  a  relation  between 
the  differentiation  and  fixity  of  organ  and  tissue  differentials  on  the  one  hand, 
and  organismal  differentials  on  the  other  hand,  and  in  certain  respects  also 
a  parallelism  between  the  development  of  organ  and  tissue  differentials  and 
organismal  differentials  in  the  phylogenetic  and  in  the  ontogenetic  series;  but 
this  parallelism  exists  only  in  a  general  way.  As  stated  above,  gradations  in 
refinement  of  differentiation  with  advancing  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic 
development  can  be  more  clearly  recognized  in  the  case  of  organs  and  tissues 
than  in  the  case  of  the  organismal  differentials. 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  PIECES  OF  TISSUE  257 

However,  while  thus  a  great  similarity  exists  between  the  successive  changes 
in  the  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  series  as  far  as  the  development  of  the 
organismal  and  organ  differentials  is  concerned,  there  are  also  some  very 
important  differences  in  these  two  series.  In  phylogenetic  evolution  we  have 
to  deal  with  changes  in  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  organisms  as  the  basis 
for  the  corresponding  changes  in  organismal  differentials  and  in  individuality, 
and  in  differentiation  and  fixity  of  organs  and  tissues.  On  the  whole,  we  can 
trace  the  relationship  between  different  species  of  animals,  one  species  de- 
veloping from  the  other  in  an  apparently  connected  series  and  each  possessing 
its  own  kind  of  organismal  differentials;  the  later  species  show  a  greater 
complexity  and  fixity  in  the  organismal  differentials  than  the  preceding  ones 
and,  accordingly,  also  a  greater  differentiation  and  fixity  of  the  organ  and 
tissue  differentials. 

This  same  relationship  obtains  also  if  we  compare  the  corresponding 
ontogenetic  stages  in  the  different  classes  and  species  of  animals;  but  in 
ontogenetic  development  there  is,  as  far  as  we  know  at  present,  in  the  con- 
secutive stages  of  development  throughout,  an  identity  in  the  genetic  consti- 
tution of  cells  and  tissues  in  the  same  individual  and  species.  And  if  in  the 
series  of  ontogenetic  stages  likewise  a  development  of  the  organismal  differ- 
entials takes  place,  it  is  one  from  the  precursor  predifferential  stage  in  the 
fertilized  egg  to  the  mature  organismal  differentials  in  the  adult  organism. 
The  genetic  basis  of  the  organismal  differentials  remains  unchanged  in  all 
these  successive  stages.  We  have  then  to  deal,  during  embyronal  life,  with  a 
development  of  the  organismal  differentials  that  is  parallel  to  the  develop- 
ment of  organ  and  tissue  differentials.  In  both,  the  genetic  basis  is  already 
present  in  the  egg,  and  notwithstanding  this  sameness  of  the  genetic  consti- 
tution throughout  the  series  of  successive  ontogenetic  stages,  the  constitution 
of  the  tissues  as  well  as  of  the  organismal  differentials  changes  progressively. 
With  this  increasing  development  of  organismal  differentials  out  of  their 
precursor  stages  or  predifferentials,  the  mutual  compatibility  of  tissues  pos- 
sessing different  organismal  differentials  decreases.  In  testing  by  means  of 
transplantation  the  effect  of  the  increasing  differentiation  of  tissues  and 
organs  and  their  differentials  on  the  plasticity  of  organs,  the  adaptability  of 
the  organs  and  tissues  to  new  environments,  and  the  mutual  interactions 
between  the  grafts  and  host  tissues,  we  introduce  at  the  same  time  a  second 
variable  in  this  experiment,  namely,  a  change  in  the  character  of  the  organis- 
mal differentials  which  also  have  progressed  in  the  direction  from  their 
precursors  to  more  mature  differentials  in  the  course  of  embryonal  develop- 
ment. In  observing  the  effects  of  the  new  environment  on  organs  and  tissues 
we  may  thus  have  to  deal  with  a  summation  of  effects  of  both  the  changes 
in  organ  and  in  organismal  differentials.  It  is  conceivable  that  likewise  during 
the  process  of  regeneration  in  the  earliest  stages  the  precursors  of  organismal 
differentials  are  present  in  the  regenerating  tissues,  and  that  with  progressive 
regeneration  the  precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials  present  in  ordinary 
tissues  and  in  totipotent  cells,  mature  into  the  fully  adult  organismal  differen- 


258  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tials.  This  would  not  apply  however  to  the  highest  organisms,  where  regen- 
erative processes  are  much  reduced  in  extent  and  where  totipotent  or  even 
pluripotent  cells  no  longer  are  present  in  the  regenerating  substratum. 

In  regard  to  the  evolution  of  organismal  differentials,  and  of  the  individu- 
ality which  depends  upon  these  differentials,  there  is,  therefore,  as  far  as  we 
know  at  the  present  time,  a  radical  difference  between  phylogenetic  and  onto- 
genetic development ;  and  this  difference  is  present  notwithstanding  the  many 
structural  and  functional  analogies  which  have  been  shown  to  exist  between 
the  various  stages  of  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  evolution,  as  far  as  the 
differentiation  of  tissues  and  organs  is  concerned.  Furthermore,  while  the 
basic  constitution  of  the  organismal,  and,  in  particular,  also  the  individuality 
differentials  corresponds  closely  to  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  various 
organisms,  the  subsequent  differentiation  of  these  organismal  differentials 
depends  not  alone  on  these  genetic  complexes,  but  also  on  the  progressive 
changes  in  organs  and  tissues  which  occur  in  the  course  of  ontogenetic  de- 
velopment within  the  same  organism ;  a  combination  of  both  genetic  and  non- 
genetic  factors  is  needed  for  the  differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials. 
We  may  assume  that  although  both  during  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic 
evolution  a  development  and  differentiation  of  the  organismal  differentials 
take  place,  the  precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials  must  differ 
in  these  two  series  as  widely  as  does  the  constitution  of  the  egg  protoplasm 
in  a  mammal  and  the  cytoplasm  in  an  ameba  or  in  a  coelenterate. 


Chapter  $ 

Organizers  and  Tissue  Differentiation,  and  Their 
Relation  to  Organismal  Differentials 

In  our  discussion  of  the  factors  which  cause  organ  formation  in  primi- 
tive organisms,  we  have  referred  to  organizers  localized  in  certain  organs, 
which  are  able  to  induce  the  production  of  these  same  organs  in  another 
animal  of  the  same  species  into  which  they  have  been  transplanted.  How- 
ever, the  "organizer"  concept  was  not  used  originally  in  the  analysis  of  organ 
formation  in  phylogenetically  primitive  species,  but  rather  in  embryos  of 
less  primitive  organisms.  The  transplantation  of  pieces  of  organs  may  lead 
to  the  development  of  organs  or  of  embryonal  tissues  other  than  those  which 
function  as  organizers,  and,  in  particular,  the  latter  may  induce  the  formation 
of  parts  of  an  organism  normally  adjoining  the  organizer  tissue.  It  has  been 
possible  to  trace  this  potentiality  to  the  formation  of  organs  and  tissues  and 
the  distribution  of  organ-forming  substances  from  the  ovum  through  the  first 
segments,  through  blastula  and  gastrula,  to  the  more  complex  organisms. 
Associated  with  these  changes  is  a  parallel  development  of  organismal  differen- 
tials from  their  precursors,  which  also  proceeds  in  the  direction  from  less 
specific  to  more  specific  substances  and  mechanisms.  It  is  this  parallelism  in 
these  two  processes  and  the  possibility  of  a  relationship  between  them  which 
we  wish  to  analyze  in  this  chapter. 

As  stated,  tissue  and  organ  formation  during  embryonal  life  is  brought 
about  partly  by  substances  which  function  as  organizers  in  association  with 
inherent,  genetically  determined  characteristics  of  the  tissues,  which  are  the 
substratum  on  which  the  organizers  act.  The  organizers  may  be  defined  as 
morphogenic  contact  substances,  which  serve  as  tissue  transformers,  or 
rather,  as  inductors,  causing  the  tissues  with  which  they  come  in  contact  to 
undergo  certain  changes,  which,  within  a  definite  range  of  variability,  are 
fixed  by  the  constitution  of  the  tissues  upon  which  they  act.  In  the  earlier 
stages  of  embryonal  development,  when  the  plasticity  and  range  of  variability 
of  the  tissues  are  still  very  great,  these  substances  may  determine  which  of 
their  potential  differentiations  the  tissues  will  actually  undergo.  When  in 
later  stages  the  structure  of  the  organism  has  become  more  stabilized,  the 
organizers  may  exert  quantitative  rather  than  qualitative  effects;  they  may 
determine  not  what  kind  of  organs  are  to  be  produced,  but  what  their  size 
and  position  shall  be  and  how  many  of  them  shall  be  formed;  or  they  may 
stimulate  the  tissues  to  develop  in  a  certain  direction  rather  than  to  stand  still 
or  to  undergo  only  relatively  slight  further  differentiation.  But  this  difference 
between  the  effects  exerted  in  earlier  and  later  embryonal  stages  is  not  a  radical 
one ;  it  is  rather  a  difference  of  degree.  As  might  be  expected,  during  embryonal 
development  we  may  have  to  deal  not  only  with  single  inductions  by  or- 

259 


260  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ganizers,  but  with  chains  of  such  transformations.  An  organizer  induces  a 
certain  tissue  and  organ  formation ;  there  is  associated  with  this  transforma- 
tion the  production  of  a  new  organizer,  which,  on  its  part,  induces  a  specific 
differentiation  in  the  surrounding  tissue  and  this  again  may  lead  to  the  forma- 
tion of  an  additional  organizer  exerting  a  specific  function. 

There  are,  then,  two  sets  of  factors  which  fix  the  structure,  chemical  con- 
stitution, metabolism  and  function  of  tissues  and  organs:  (1)  The  inherent 
characteristics  of  tissues  and  their  range  of  modifiability,  which  may  lead 
to  development  by  "self-differentiation,"  and  (2)  the  character  of  the  or- 
ganizers which  are  parts  of  the  inner  environment  of  the  tissues.  There  is 
reason  for  assuming  that,  in  general,  without  the  action  of  the  organizers  the 
development  of  the  early  embryonal  tissues  would  be  very  imperfect  and 
rudimentary.  This  is  indicated  by  the  behavior  of  isolated  embryonal  tissues 
made  to  grow  in  vitro;  even  here,  differentiation  of  tissues  seems  to  depend 
largely  upon  the  interaction  between  adjoining  tissues  and  their  organizers, 
and  if  this  interaction  is  lacking,  further  differentiation  does  not  take  place. 
However,  the  artificial  growth  stimuli  as  such,  acting  in  vitro,  tend  to  prevent 
further  differentiation.  The  less  evident  the  action  of  the  organizers  is  in  the 
differentiation  of  tissues,  the  more  the  tissues  appear  to  develop  as  the  result 
of  inherent  conditions  by  way  of  self -differentiation.  Development  by  self- 
differentiation  usually  leads  to  a  more  restricted  formation  of  organs  than 
that  which  takes  place  under  the  influence  of  organizers.  In  general,  with 
advancing  differentiation  and  increasing  fixity  of  tissues  in  the  course  of 
embryonal  life,  self-differentiation  comes  to  play  a  greater  role  and  the 
tissue  will  depend  less  upon  specific  environmental  organizer  effects. 

Furthermore,  with  the  increasing  development  and  differentiation  of  the 
organizer  tissue,  the  organizer  may  change  or  the  organizer  effect  may  be  lost, 
although  even  tissues  in  an  advanced  stage  of  differentiation,  such  as  retina 
or  brain,  may  still  exert  some  of  the  organizer  action  which  the  more  primi- 
tive precursors  of  these  tissues  exerted.  Likewise,  with  increasing  differen- 
tiation, different  parts  of  the  organizer  tissue  may  begin  to  undergo  modifica- 
tions in  respect  to  the  organizer  functions  they  exert. 

Both  organizer  and  conditions  inherent  in  the  recipient  tissue  or  substratum 
are  then  of  importance  in  embryonal  development;  therefore  a  tissue  may 
develop  by  self-differentiation  in  the  absence  of  an  organizer  and  it  may  be 
modified  in  its  development  by  the  presence  of  an  organizer.  Of  course,  there 
may  be  always  hidden  in  the  apparent  process  of  self-differentiation  some 
previously  exerted  effects  of  organizers.  Now,  this  interaction  between  these 
two  sets  of  factors  may  assume  the  character  of  a  competitive  struggle  between 
the  inertia  of  the  substratum,  with  its  varying  potentialities,  and  the  inductive 
activity  of  the  organizers.  Thus  the  same  organizer  may  be  able  to  accomplish 
a  certain  transformation  with  one  tissue  with  which  it  comes  in  contact, 
but  not  with  another.  Or  the  difference  may  be  of  a  quantitative  character 
rather  than  an  absolute  one;  the  organizer  may  be  able  to  induce  a  certain 
change  more  readily  in  one  organ  than  in  another;  or  in  one  tissue  the  or- 
ganizer may  readily  induce  newformation  of  a  certain  kind,  while  in  another 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  261 

the  same  organizer  may  induce  only  quantitative  changes  in  number,  velocity 
and  intensity  of  developmental  processes.  Furthermore,  quantitative  relations 
between  the  tissue  acting  as  organizer  and  the  tissue  representing  the  sub- 
stratum may  play  a  certain  role.  Hence,  if  the  substratum  tissue  is  very 
extensive,  it  may  offer  an  effective  resistance  to  the  activity  of  the  organizer 
and  appear  inert;  on  the  other  hand,  if  the  organizer  tissue  is  very  large, 
it  may  induce  in  the  substratum  changes  which  are  greater  from  a  quantitative 
point  of  view,  although  they  may  be  of  the  same  character  as  those  effected 
by  smaller  pieces  of  organizer  tissue.  There  seems  to  be  active  here,  a  quan- 
titative relationship  not  unlike  that  characteristic  of  certain  chemical  inter- 
actions which  determine  the  ultimate  kind  of  equilibrium  to  be  attained.  We 
noted  similar  effects  of  the  relative  size  of  host  and  graft  in  transplantations 
in  phylogenetically  primitive  organisms. 

This  struggle  between  the  inductive  activity  of  the  organizer  and  the  re- 
sistance of  the  substratum  is  also  exemplified  in  the  interaction  between  the 
organizer  belonging  to  one  species  or  order  of  animals  and  the  substratum 
belonging  to  another  species  or  order.  In  this  case,  the  direction  in  which 
the  differentiation  of  the  affected  tissue  shall  take  place  may  be  determined 
by  the  organismal  differentials  or  their  precursors  in  the  substratum,  rather 
than  by  the  precursors  of  the  organismal  ^differentials  in  the  organizer  tissue. 
The  organizer  may  transmit  merely  the  impulse  to  further  differentiation  of 
the  tissue  in  the  direction  of  certain  organ  formations ;  but  the  character  of 
these  organs  is  modified  by  the  characteristics  of  the  species  or  order  to  which 
the  substratum  tissue  belongs.  The  organismal  differentials  or  their  pre- 
cursors do  not  exhibit  a  modifiability  under  the  influence  of  organizers  com- 
parable to  that  which  the  specific  substances  of  the  various  organs  and  tissues, 
the  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  display. 

Thus  in  the  analysis  of  the  organizer  action  use  was  made,  especially  by 
Spemann,  Zeinitz  and  Schotte,  of  transplantations  into  different  species  and 
orders,  either  the  organizer  tissue  being  transplanted  into  a  distant  host,  or 
the  tissue  serving  as  substratum  being  grafted  into  a  different  species  in  such 
a  way  that  it  came  in  contact  with  the  organizer  of  the  host.  In  both  these 
instances  the  inductions  expected  took  place.  These  experiments  furnished  at 
the  same  time  further  data  as  to  the  transplantability  of  tissues  representing 
early  embryonal  stages.  It  was  in  this  way  possible  to  graft  successfully  tissues 
belonging  not  only  to  different  species,  but  even  to  different  orders,  and  the 
latter  type  was  called  xenotransplantation.  But  in  xenotransplantations  there 
was  sometimes  noticeable  on  the  part  of  the  grafts  a  tendency  not  to  enter 
into  perfect  union  with  the  adjoining  host  tissue;  however,  the  time  during 
which  the  strange  tissues  were  kept  under  observation  in  these  experiments 
was  short,  because  the  main  aim  was  the  analysis  of  the  organizers  rather 
than  of  the  organismal  differentials  or  their  precursors.  Nevertheless,  as  far 
as  such  investigations  make  conclusions  possible,  they  seem  to  confirm  the 
view  expressed  in  the  preceding  chapters,  that  in  early  embryonal  tissues  the 
organismal  differentials,  or  rather  the  mechanisms  through  which  their 
existence  becomes  manifest,  are  not  yet  fully  developed  and  the  range  of 


262  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

transplantability  in  these  early  embryonal  states  is,  therefore,  still  greater 
than  in  the  later  ones. 

While  it  was  possible  to  keep  embryonal  tissues  alive,  at  least  for  a  short 
time,  after  hetero-  or  xenotransplantation  and  to  obtain  organizer  effects, 
it  has  been  found  more  recently  that  it  is  not  necessary  to  transplant  living 
tissue  in  order  to  obtain  induction.  In  these  experiments  the  dorsal  lip  of  the 
blastopore  from  urodele  gastrulae,  which  had  been  found  to  contain  especially 
efficient  organizer  material,  was  used  primarily,  but  also  other  material,  such 
as  medullary  plate,  with  the  underlying  mesodermal  structures,  showed  marked 
organizer  effects.  In  contact  with  ectoderm  of  the  gastrula,  this  material 
caused  the  transformation  of  the  ectoderm  into  a  medullary  plate.  Thus 
Spemann,  Bautzmann,  Holtfreter  and  Mangold  could  show  that  tissue  which 
had  been  killed  by  exposure  to  heat  or  cold,  by  drying  or  by  mechanical 
means,  could  still  function  as  an  active  organizer.  Likewise  tissues  treated 
with  alcohol,  ether,  acetone,  glacial  acetic,  hydrochloric  acid  or  xylol,  or 
infiltrated  with  paraffine,  were  still  effective.  Moreover,  tissues  which,  in  the 
living  state,  lacked  the  ability  to  act  as  inductors,  acquired  this  property  after 
they  had  been  killed  by  drying  (Holtfreter),  or  following  treatment  with 
acetone  and  alcohol.  Thus  entoderm  or  ectoderm  of  gastrulae  acquired  the 
ability  to  induce  medullary  plate  formation  after  they  had  been  exposed  to 
such  treatment.  Even  the  unsegmented  egg  could,  under  these  conditions, 
induce  the  development  of  very  differentiated  organs,  such  as  the  lens  of  the 
eye,  whole  eyes,  optic  vesicles,  and  parts  of  the  brain.  Spemann  has  suggested 
that  the  manifestation  of  organizer  action  in  material  formerly  devoid  of 
such  effects  may  be  due  to  the  removal,  by  means  of  solvents,  of  inhibiting 
substances  which  had  been  present  in  the  living,  inactive  tissues,  or  the 
changes  which  take  place  during  the  denaturation  of  protein  may  set  free 
the  active  organizer.  As  to  the  chemical  nature  of  the  substances  which  act 
as  organizers,  the  evidence  obtained  so  far  appears  to  be  contradictory;  the 
effects  have  been  attributed  to  various  substances,  glycogen,  proteins,  and 
simpler  hydrocarbons.  It  is  possible  that  proteins  in  combination  with  glycogen 
or  with  certain  non-specific  lipoid  substances  may  act  as  organizers ;  also 
estrogens  and  carcinogenic  hydrocarbons  may  perhaps  exert  organizer  func- 
tion (Needham  and  Waddington).  Some  investigators  have  found  that  injury 
of  embryonal  tissue  may  activate  the  organizer. 

Considering  the  fact  that  dead  tissues  of  amphibian  embryos  and  certain 
extracts  from  such  tissues  may  serve  as  organizers,  it  is  not  surprising  to  learn 
further  that  a  great  number  of  organs  of  embryos  or  adult  forms  of  verte- 
brates as  well  as  of  invertebrates  may  act  as  organizers  in  gastrulae  of  Triton. 
In  some  instances  adult  tissue  from  distant  species  has  first  to  be  killed  by 
heat  before  it  will  thus  act ;  but  in  other  cases,  strange  adult  living  tissues 
exert  this  function  after  transplantation. 

These  results  apparently  are  contradictory  to  the  great  specificity  of  the 
factors  which  are  evident  during  embryonal  life,  where  only  definite  organs 
and  not  others  can  act  as  organizers  at  given  periods  of  embryonal  develop- 
ment and  in  definite  areas  of  the  embryo  if  certain  results  are  to  be  obtained. 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  263 

However,  the  injured  or  killed  material  does  not  behave  exactly  like  living 
tissues  from  the  same  or  related  species  or  orders  of  animals ;  the  former 
seems  to  be  less  specific,  as  shown  by  the  fact  that  it  induces  a  smaller  number 
of  transformations  in  the  tissues  on  which  it  acts,  and  the  fine  differences 
between  different  parts  of  a  certain  organ  used  as  organizer  are  lost  under 
these  conditions.  Thus,  while  in  the  normal  medullary  plate  of  Triton  different 
portions  are  differentiated — the  anterior  portion  inducing  formation  of  brain, 
eyes,  nose,  ear  vesicles  and  balancer,  the  posterior  portion  inducing  formation 
of  spinal  cord  and  tail — in  the  medullary  plate  produced  by  killed  material 
these  specific  differences  between  anterior  and  posterior  portions  are  no 
longer  present,  the  different  parts  acting  alike.  It  is  especially  the  development 
of  neural  tube  from  ectoderm  of  the  gastrula  which  can  be  induced  by  dead 
organizer  material.  The  production  of  certain  mesodermal  structures,  such 
as  kidney,  musculature,  bone  and  extremities,  can  only  barely  be  initiated 
by  killed  organizer  tissue,  and  at  best  these  organs  and  tissues  are  formed  only 
in  small  quantities.  But  coagulated  embryo  extract  of  the  chick  may  call  forth 
not  only  the  development  of  nerve  tissue  in  gastrula  ectoderm,  but  even 
of  chorda  and  musculature.  It  seems,  after  all,  that  there  is  no  absolute,  but 
only  a  graded  difference  in  the  ability  of  dead  tissue  to  function  as  organizer 
and  in  the  specificity  of  the  transformations  brought  about  by  it,  as  compared 
with  the  effects  of  living  tissues  of  the  same  kind.  Needham  and  Waddington 
distinguish  two  types  of  actions  of  organizers:  (1)  The  organizer  reproduces 
or  tends  to  reproduce  the  axis  of  the  embryo  and,  ultimately,  a  more  or  less 
whole,  early  embryonal  stage  of  the  organism,  which  furnishes  the  sub- 
stratum for  its  operation.  This  process  is  designated  as  "evocation"  and  the 
organizer  involved  is  called  an  "evocator."  It  is  a  relatively  non-specific  action, 
which  may  be  shown  also  by  dead  material,  and  it  represents  a  much  more 
simple  chemical  effect  than  that  exerted  by  (2)  the  individuator  which  pro- 
duces certain  subdivisions  of  the  axis.  The  latter  type  of  action  is  exhibited 
only  by  living  tissue.  Somewhat  related  views  have  also  been  expressed  by 
Weiss. 

The  ability  of  xenoplastic  tissues  to  act  as  organizers  suggests  that  the 
organizers  are  either  entirely  devoid  of  organismal  differentials,  or  bear 
organismal  differentials  with  a  very  slight  degree  of  differentiation.  This  en- 
ables the  transplanted  tissues  which  contain  the  organizer  to  exert  their  func- 
tion in  the  host,  notwithstanding  the  great  difference  in  organismal  differen- 
tials;  or  their  precursors,  in  host  and  transplant;  likewise,  the  experiments 
with  dead  organizer  material  suggest  that  the  organizers,  at  least  those  possess- 
ing the  more  restricted,  the  evocator  functions  of  the  killed  tissues,  are  devoid 
of  organismal  differentials.  In  contrast  to  the  lack  of  organismal  differentials 
in  the  inducting  and  transforming  substances,  the  living  substratum  on  which 
they  act  does  possess  organismal  differentials. 

We  may  enlarge  somewhat  on  these  more  general  statements  by  citing 
some  specific  experiments.  If  we  transplant  prospective  medullary  plate  into 
regions  where  the  ectoderm  normally  develops  into  epidermis,  the  transplant 
may,  in  its  new  location,  merely  form  skin.  Conversely,  prospective  epidermis 


264  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

transplanted  into  a  defect  in  the  region  of  the  presumptive  medullary  plate, 
is  able  to  develop  into  parts  of  the  central  nervous  system  and  it  may  give 
rise  to  the  formation  of  an  eye.  On  the  other  hand,  if  a  differentiated  medul- 
lary plate,  together  with  adjoining  mesodermal  tissue,  which  will  give  rise 
to  chorda  formation,  is  transplanted  into  a  gastrula,  it  may  induce  in  the 
overlying  ectoderm  the  formation  of  a  medullary  plate.  We  see,  then,  that 
an  organizer  may  induce  in  the  recipient  tissue  either  structures  of  the  same 
kind  as  the  organized  tissue,  a  process  we  may  designate  as  "isoinduction," 
or  it  may  induce  structures  of  another  kind,  "alloinduction,"  as  when  archen- 
teron  induces  formation  of  medullary  plates.  Similar  differences  in  organizer 
action  we  mentioned  in  our  analysis  of  the  factors  which  are  potent  in  trans- 
plantation in  lower  adult  vertebrates. 

The  isoinduction  which  we  mentioned,  may  be  of  a  very  specific  character. 
As  Mangold  has  shown,  the  medullary  plate  of  the  neurula  may  be  divided 
into  four  parts  in  the  direction  from  head  to  tail,  and  each  part  is  then 
found  to  induce  in  the  host  the  formation  of  those  organs  into  which  that 
particular  segment  of  the  medulla  itself  would  have  developed,  although  to 
some  extent  the  effects  of  the  different  segments  are  overlapping.  However, 
the  various  parts  of  the  underlying  mesodermal  tissue  may  also  exert  corre- 
sponding specific  formative  effects,  cephalic  parts  of  the  roof  of  the  archenteron 
tending  to  induce  the  nervous  structures  characteristic  of  the  head,  the 
posterior  portions  tending  to  induce  the  tail  parts. 

While  in  some  cases  the  ability  of  a  tissue  to  act  as  an  organizer  may  be 
retained  with  further  development,  or  may  become  specifically  localized  in 
certain  portions  of  the  organizer  area,  in  other  cases  this  power  is  lost.  Thus 
not  only  the  medullary  plate,  but  also  the  fully  developed  brain  tissue  may 
function  as  an  organizer  for  the  transformation  of  ectoderm  into  medullary 
plate.  Similarly,  the  embryonal  optic  disc,  as  stated  above,  can  call  forth  in 
the  overlying  ectoderm  the  formation  of  lens  tissue.  With  further  differentia- 
tion of  the  optic  disc,  such  action  has  apparently  been  transferred  to  the  fully 
differentiated  retina  of  the  Triton  eye,  which  now  has  gained  the  power  to 
induce  in  the  iris  of  the  eye  the  formation  of  a  lens.  On  the  other  hand,  under 
certain  conditions,  with  increasing  differentiation  a  diminution  or  a  specific 
limitation  in  the  capacity  to  serve  as  an  organizer  may  be  noted.  From  the 
dorsal  lip  of  the  Triton  gastrula,  which,  as  we  have  seen,  acts  as  a  very 
effective  organizer,  there  develops  chorda  as  well  as  mesodermal  structures; 
but  Mangold  has  demonstrated  that  it  is  only  the  chorda  which  preserves  for 
some  time  the  ability  to  induce  the  production  of  a  medullary  plate  from  the 
presumptive  epidermis,  while  the  mesodermal  structures  have  lost  this  func- 
tion. 

During  embryonal  development  we  may  have  to  deal  with  chain  reactions 
induced  by  successive  organizers.  Certain  mesodermal  structures  may  induce 
the  formation  of  the  optic  disc,  and  the  optic  disc  in  contact  with  ectoderm 
induces  the  formation  of  a  lens ;  but  here  the  chain  reaction  ends,  the  lens  not 
being  able  further  to  act  as  an  organizer.  Another  chain  reaction  is  the  fol- 
lowing: ectoderm,  which  under  normal  conditions  would  differentiate  into 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  265 

epidermis,  may  be  transformed  into  mesoderm  if  it  is  transplanted  into  a 
place  in  the  embryo  where  normally  mesodermal  structures  develop.  After 
further  transplantation,  these  mesodermal  tissues,  if  they  are  brought  into 
contact  with  other  ectoderm,  are  able  to  induce  the  formation  of  a  medullary 
plate,  and  the  medullary  plate  can  induce  the  formation  of  medullary  plate 
and  other  nerve  structures  from  ectoderm. 

As  stated  above,  in  addition  to  organizer  actions  induced  from  the  outside, 
there  are  active  processes  inherent  in  the  tissues  themselves,  leading  to  self- 
differentiation  ;  during  normal  embryonal  development  these  two  processes 
seem  to  cooperate  in  various  combinations,  in  which  the  relative  importance 
of  each  factor  may  differ  quantitatively.  Various  kinds  of  interaction  may 
thus  be  produced  experimentally.  We  have  referred  previously  to  an  instance 
in  which  an  organ,  although  much  differentiated,  still  retains  its  ability  to  act 
as  an  organizer.  The  optic  disc  in  certain  stages  of  embryonal  development 
can  induce  lens  formation  in  some  species  only  in  the  cephalic  ectoderm,  while 
in  other  species  at  a  certain  stage  of  differentiation,  also  ectoderm  of  the  rest 
of  the  body  can  be  made  to  develop  into  lens.  Now,  Mangold  has  found  that 
the  eye-forming  substances  are  determined  in  the  ectoderm  a  short  time  after 
the  mesodermal  tissues  and  the  chorda,  constituting  the  roof  of  the  archen- 
teron,  have  formed  and  have  been  able  to  act  on  the  ectoderm ;  it  is  therefore 
possible  that  this  contact  induces  the  ability  of  the  overlying  ectoderm  to 
differentiate  into  an  eye.  However  that  may  be,  it  can  be  shown  that,  from 
a  certain  period  in  embryonal  development  on,  there  is  manifested  in  the 
overlying  neural  plate,  as  a  result  of  increasing  self-differentiation,  an  inherent 
tendency  to  produce  optic  vesicles  independently  of  any  organizer  action.  Yet 
even  then,  according  to  Adelman,  an  organizer  action  may  be  associated  in 
its  effects  with  this  process  of  self-differentiation.  The  roof  of  the  archen- 
teron  of  Amblystoma  not  only  tends  to  reinforce  the  inherent  tendency  of  the 
ectoderm  to  form  eyes,  but  it  also  modifies  the  place  in  the  neural  plate  where 
the  eyes  develop.  Inherently  the  median  portion  of  the  neural  plate  has  a 
greater  tendency  to  form  eyes  by  self-differentiation  than  the  lateral  parts; 
but  the  underlying  roof  of  the  archenteron  acquires  a  marked  bilateral  polarity 
in  the  course  of  embryonal  development,  and  this  condition  influences  the 
organizer  action  of  this  tissue ;  the  lateral  parts  of  the  underlying  tissue  now 
gain  a  greater  tendency  to  induce  or  to  intensify  eye  formation  than  its  median 
part,  the  organizer  action  dominating  over  the  forces  inherent  in  the  neural 
plates  and  causing  the  production  of  lateral  eyes. 

These  interferences  between  self-differentiation  tendencies  and  organizer 
action  can  be  shown  in  still  another  way.  If  the  lateral  parts  of  the  neural 
plates  are  transplanted  together  with  the  underlying  organizer  tissues,  more 
eyes  are  formed  than  would  develop  without  the  latter.  If,  on  the  other  hand, 
the  median  parts  of  the  neural  plate  are  transplanted  without  the  underlying 
tissues,  they  form  eyes  just  as  well ;  however,  median  parts  of  the  underlying 
tissue,  when  transplanted  with  the  median  neural  plate,  frequently  cause  the 
separation  of  the  eye-forming  material  into  two  eyes,  while  without  this 
tissue,  more  often  only  one  eye  forms.  In  this  case  the  organizer  exerts  effects 


266  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  a  quantitative  rather  than  of  a  qualitative  character.  We  have  here  to  deal, 
as  in  all  vital  phenomena,  with  a  quantitatively  varying  interaction  between 
genetically  determined,  inherent  factors  and  inner  or  outer  environmental 
factors.  It  must  be  borne  in  mind  that  inner  environmental  factors  may  also 
be  genetically  determined. 

The  relations  between  inductor  and  recipient  substratum  may  vary  in  dif- 
ferent cases.  As  Mangold  points  out,  ordinarily  an  organizer  transforms  the 
substratum  in  such  a  way  that  both  organizer  and  substratum  form  one  whole, 
which  tends  to  reproduce  the  organism  in  which  this  transformation  occurs. 
This  condition  Mangold  designates  as  "complementary  induction."  But,  in 
other  cases  the  organizer  gives  rise  in  the  host  tissue  to  the  formation  of 
structures  which  do  not  fit  into  such  an  organization,  as  when  double  or  other 
abnormal  structures  develop.  Such  an  occurrence  Mangold  calls  "autonomous 
induction."  This  is  found  only  under  abnormal  conditions ;  for  instance,  when 
the  age  and  stage  of  differentiation  differ  very  much  in  inductor  and  sub- 
stratum, so  that  the  typical  sequence  of  interactions  is  disturbed.  Or,  in  other 
cases  an  autonomous  induction  may  take  place  in  case  of  xenoplastic  trans- 
plantation when  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  are  so 
strange  to  each  other  that  a  complementary  result  becomes  impossible. 

These  observations  present  an  interesting  parallelism  to  those  found  after 
transplantation  of  adult  pieces  of  organs  or  tissues  in  primitive  classes  of 
animals.  Here  also  the  transplant  may  unite  with  the  host  in  an  integrated 
manner,  leading  in  the  end  to  the  formation  of  a  normal  individual.  We  may 
assume  that  under  these  conditions  a  tissue  acting  as  organizer  causes  com- 
plementary induction ;  but  if  the  surfaces  of  contact  do  not  fit  each  other, 
or  if  the  organismal  differentials  are  too  far  removed  from  each  other,  then 
an  autonomous  induction  takes  place  in  the  embryo,  while  in  the  adult  the 
transplant  becomes  absorbed  or  is  cast  off  and  the  host  tissue  may  undergo 
regenerative  growth  processes. 

As  to  the  effect  of  the  relative  size  of  organizer  and  recipient  tissue, 
Bytinski-Salz  has  observed  that  within  a  certain  range  the  larger  the  organizer 
piece  the  greater  its  effectiveness,  other  conditions  being  equal.  Quite  recently 
Schotte  carried  out  some  experiments  which,  while  made  for  other  purposes, 
also  have  some  bearing  on  this  question.  He  transplanted  large  portions  of 
the  ectoderm,  including  the  presumptive  medullary  plate,  from  young  gastrulae 
of  Hyla  crucifer  to  the  face  region  of  Amblystoma  punctatum,  the  former  a 
relatively  small  and  the  latter  a  relatively  large  organism.  Under  the  influence 
of  the  large  quantity  of  organizer  for  mouth  organs  which  was  present  in  the 
face  region  of  the  Amblystoma  host,  mouth  organs  formed  in  Hyla  skin, 
which  were  typical  suckers  with  Hyla  character,  but  they  were  three  times 
as  large  as  they  normally  are  in  Hyla.  The  number  of  cells  which  entered  into 
these  suckers  was  likewise  about  three  times  greater  than  is  normally  observed 
in  Hyla  embryos.  Similar  results  were  obtained  with  the  induction  of  other 
organs,  such  as  lenses,  nasal  placodes,  ear  vesicles  and  mouth  organs.  We  may 
assume  that  the  larger  quantity  of  organizer  material  present  in  certain  regions 
of  Amblystoma  induces  formation  of  correspondingly  larger  organs  in  the 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  267 

recipient  transplanted  tissue,  although  the  latter  belongs  to  a  different  order. 
While,  therefore,  the  organismal  differentials  inherent  in  the  ectoderm  of 
Hyla  influnced  the  type  of  organ  which  would  develop,  the  organizer  modified 
the  size  and  cell  number  in  the  developing  organ. 

We  have  seen  that  in  early  phylogenetic  stages  the  character  of  the  organ- 
ismal differentials  carried  by  the  parts  which  are  joined  together  is  of  im- 
portance in  determining  the  mode  of  interaction  between  the  different  tissues 
of  the  two  partners.  Similarly,  we  may  inquire  how  a  gastrula  and  a  piece  of 
tissue  to  be  grafted  into  it,  one  or  the  other  of  which  is  the  carrier  of  an 
effective  organizer,  will  interact  when  the  transplantations  are  of  a  heterog- 
enous or  xenogenous  character. 

Some  important  observations  which  have  a  bearing  on  this  problem  were 
made  many  years  ago  by  Lewis,  who  found  that  the  optic  vesicle  was  able  to 
induce  in  embryonal  skin  the  production  of  cornea,  even  if  skin  and  optic 
vesicle  belonged  to  different  species.  Spemann  transplanted  ectoderm,  repre- 
senting presumptive  abdominal  skin,  from  Triton  taeniatus  into  the  anterior, 
the  brain  portion  of  the  developing  nervous  system  of  Triton  cristatus.  The 
latter  acted  as  inductor  and  transformed  the  skin  into  central  nervous  tissue, 
which  retained,  however,  the  original  species  characteristics  of  Triton  taenia- 
tus. Similarly,  after  heterotransplantation  of  ectodermal  tissues  from  Triton 
taeniatus  into  the  gill  region  of  Triton  cristatus,  the  gill  which  developed  from 
the  taeniatus  tissue  under  the  influence  of  cristatus  organizers  retained  the 
characteristics  of  the  taeniatus  species. 

More  recently,  Mangold  showed  that  the  mesodermal  structures  and  chorda 
of  the  host  could  act  as  organizers  even  towards  heterogenous  presumptive 
ectoderm  transplanted  into  different  species  of  Triton  (cristatus,  alpestris  and 
taeniatus).  The  differentiation  of  the  transplant  under  the  influence  of  the 
heterogenous  organizer  tissue  proceeded  in  the  same  way  as  after  homoio- 
transplantation ;  the  rudimentary  embryos  consisted  of  constituents  of  two 
different  species,  which,  uniting  harmoniously,  thus  represented  chimaeras. 
More  extensive  investigations  of  organizer  functions  following  transplanta- 
tion into  different  species  with  varying  degrees  of  relationship  were  made, 
especially  by  Zeinitz,  Bytinski-Salz,  and  Schotte.  While  in  the  majority  of 
such  experiments  tissues  from  different  species  were  transplanted  into  Triton 
taeniatus,  Bytinski-Salz  carried  out  also  the  reciprocal  transplantation  of  parts 
of  Triton  taeniatus  into  a  number  of  nearly  or  distantly  related  species.  In 
these  experiments  either  the  organizer  tissue  was  transplanted  into  the  bearer 
of  the  recipient  substratum,  or  the  recipient  tissue  of  a  strange  organism  was 
transplanted  into  the  carrier  of  the  organizer  tissue.  If  in  this  way  tissues  from 
a  more  distant  species  were  made  to  act  on  each  other,  difficulties  arose  irl 
certain  instances,  although  even  after  transplantation  of  anuran  tissues  into 
Triton,  organizer  effects  could  occasionally  be  observed. 

Whether  under  such  conditions  an  organizer  effect  occurs  depends  essen- 
tially upon  three  sets  of  factors  :  ( 1 )  The  relationship  between  host  and  trans- 
plant and  the  influence  of  organismal  differentials;  (2)  the  effect  of  toxic 
substances.  While  to  a  certain  extent  the  degree  of  toxicity  may  be  influenced 


268  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

by  the  taxonomic  relationship  between  host  and  transplant,  the  correspond- 
ence between  toxicity  and  taxonomic  relationship  is  not  perfect.  There  are 
some  species  which  are  especially  poisonous  for  Triton,  although  they  may 
not  be  farther  removed  in  relationship  than  other  less  poisonous  species.  (3) 
The  relative  rapidity  of  embryonal  development  in  host  and  transplant.  If  in 
the  transplant  the  development  takes  place  very  rapidly,  then  sufficient  time 
may  not  be  available  for  the  organizer  action  to  become  effective. 

In  general,  under  the  best  of  conditions  xenogenous  transplantations  are 
difficult.  In  many  cases  the  transplant  is  expelled  or  absorbed  after  it  has  been 
lying  for  some  time  in  the  deeper  parts  of  the  host  as  an  apparently  inert, 
though  living  tissue ;  but  it  may  be  possible  to  transplant  presumptive  epidermis 
of  Bombinator  into  the  ectoderm  of  Triton  and  have  it  develop  here  into  skin; 
but  such  skin  soon  becomes  thinner  and  gradually  it  disappears.  After  trans- 
plantation into  deeper  parts  of  the  host  it  is  either  discarded  or  gradually 
absorbed,  although  in  this  position  the  graft  may  at  first  act  like  an  interplant. 
For  a  short  time  it  may  develop  and  possibly  even  be  effected  by  the  organ- 
izers of  the  host,  producing  mesodermal  structures.  But  union  does  not  take 
place  between  host  and  transplant  and  chimaerae  do  not  form. 

If  presumptive  medullary  plate  is  transplanted  from  Bombinator  into 
Triton,  two  medullary  tubes  may  develop  in  the  host ;  one  is  from  the  trans- 
plant itself,  the  other,  originating  in  the  host,  is  determined  by  the  transplant 
acting  as  an  organizer.  But  under  these  conditions  interesting  differences  may 
appear  in  the  further  fate  of  these  new  formations,  from  those  observed  after 
heterotransplantation,  owing  to  incompatibilities  between  the  organismal 
differentials  of  the  two  tissues.  While  the  medullary  tubes  arising  after  hetero- 
transplantation may  coalesce  into  one  single  organ,  those  arising  after  xeno- 
transplantation are  unable  to  do  so ;  at  best  there  may  be  a  temporary  union 
between  the  two  medullary  formations,  which  is  followed  secondarily  by  a 
separation.  A  difference  between  the  behavior  of  hetero-  and  xenogenous 
structures  was  found  also  in  mesodermal  formations.  Here  the  difficulties  in 
the  union  of  xenogenous  structures  may  be  still  greater  than  those  observed 
in  ectodermal  tissues.  While  two  medullary  plates  or  tubes  of  xenogenous 
origin  may  exist  side  by  side,  with  mesodermal  tissues  single  organs  develop 
either  from  the  host  or  from  the  transplant,  the  one  which  develops  first 
apparently  suppressing  the  other.  In  the  case  of  mesodermal  chordae,  hetero- 
transplanted  organs  may  not  unite  with  the  analogous  host  organs.  Here  we 
find,  then,  incompatibilities  similar  to  those  which  are  observed  in  the  union 
of  distantly  related  eggs  or  young  embryos  in  echinidae  and  Ascaris,  or  in 
heterotransplantations  in  adult  hydrozoa  and  planarians.  In  all  these  instances 
the  character  of  contact  mechanisms,  which  presumably  is  contingent  upon 
the  mutual  suitability  of  contact  substances,  primarily  determines  the  possi- 
bility and  durability  of  coalescence.  As  we  have  seen  previously,  the  com- 
pleteness of  the  union  depends,  at  least  in  some  instances,  upon  the  lack  of 
regenerative  growth  processes  at  or  near  the  point  of  contact,  and  this  again 
is  determined  by  the  relationship  of  the  two  organismal  differentials  which 
interact. 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  269 

An  organizer  effect  in  case  of  xenotransplantation  may  even  be  demon- 
strable if  the  organizer  action  takes  place  at  somewhat  later  stages  of  em- 
bryonal development.  Thus  the  ectoderm  of  the  gill  area  can,  to  a  certain 
extent,  transform  ectoderm  from  other  than  the  gill  region  of  a  xenogenous 
gastrula  into  gill  tissue. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  the  organizer  can,  in  some  instances,  continue 
to  function,  but  usually  only  in  a  very  limited  way,  if  very  distant  organismal 
differentials  interact  with  each  other.  Moreover,  it  can  be  shown  that  also 
the  factors  which  determine  self-differentiation  leading  to  further  develop- 
ment may  still  act  after  xenotransplantation  of  an  embryonal  piece  of  tissue. 
Thus,  according  to  Bytinski-Salz,  anuran  presumptive  mesoderm  after 
xenotransplantation,  may  differentiate  into  chorda  and  musculature,  presump- 
tive epidermis  into  epithelium  of  the  skin. 

Mangold  and  Seidel  succeeded  in  joining  together  early  stages  of  segmen- 
tation of  Triton  eggs  belonging  to  the  same  species;  in  some  cases  a  single 
homoiogenous  organism  resulted  from  this  combination,  in  other  cases  two 
or  more  organisms  developed.  Mangold  found  that  also  union  of  heterogenous 
Triton  eggs  in  the  two-cell  stage  of  segmentation  may  succeed,  but  the  number 
of  single  organisms  which  resulted  was  smaller  than  after  homoiotransplanta- 
tion.  After  heterogenous  union  various  organs  which  developed  could  contain 
constituents  of  both  species,  which  functioned  without  any  antagonistic  reac- 
tions becoming  manifest.  However,  as  stated  above,  even  under  these  condi- 
tions various  abnormalities  developed  in  the  case  of  chorda.  It  is  these  abnor- 
malities observed  in  heterogenous  early  embryonal  combinations,  which  sug- 
gest that  noticeable  differences  exist  also  in  the  character  of  the  precursors 
of  heterogenous  organismal  differentials,  and  although  such  differences  usually 
do  not  become  evident,  they  may  lead  to  incompatibilities  under  certain  un- 
favorable conditions. 

In  combining  heterogenous  parts  in  adult  individuals  belonging  to  different 
species  in  primitive  classes  of  invertebrates,  we  have  noticed  that  it  is  usually 
the  larger  piece  which  dominates  over  the  smaller  piece.  Similarly  after  trans- 
plantation of  small  parts  of  embryos  it  is  the  larger  host  which  is  usually  the 
dominating  partner,  the  xenotransplant  being,  in  most  cases,  either  discarded 
or  destroyed ;  but  if  the  transplant  belongs  to  a  species  particularly  toxic  for 
the  host,  the  latter  may  be  injured  and  ultimately  killed  by  the  transplant. 

If  thus  xenogenous  transplantations  may  succeed  in  amphibia  and  organizer 
effects  be  exerted,  these  effects  become  manifest  after  a  relatively  short  time 
of  interaction  between  the  two  strange  tissues,  a  period  too  short  perhaps  for 
the  manifestation  of  incompatibilities  between  the  organismal  differentials. 

We  have  already  referred  to  experiments  of  Spemann  which  showed  that 
under  the  influence  of  heterogenous  inductors  the  receptive  tissues  undergo 
differentiations  into  organs  which  are  in  accordance  with  the  specific  organ- 
forming  potencies  of  the  organizers ;  yet  at  the  same  time  the  organs  and 
tissues  which  do  develop  show  the  species  characteristics  of  the  recipient 
tissues. 

Some  very  instructive  experiments  of  a  similar  nature,  illustrating  the 


270  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

specific  effects  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  recipient  tissue,  were 
reported  by  Schotte.  He  transplanted  presumptive  skin  from  the  abdomen  of 
anuran  Rana  or  Bombinator  gastrula  into  the  mouth  region  of  urodele  Triton 
or  Amblystoma  embryos.  In  the  transplants  there  developed  mouth  organs 
under  the  influence  of  the  organizers  of  Triton  and  Amblystoma;  however, 
whereas  in  the  latter  species  a  balancer  would  have  formed,  in  the  anuran 
transplants  anuran  mouth  organs,  such  as  suckers,  horny  jaws  and  teeth,  as 
well  as  operculum,  developed,  each  one  in  its  characteristic  place.  We  must 
therefore  conclude  that  the  organizers  in  the  mouth  organs  of  Triton  or 
Amblystoma  tend  to  induce  amphibian  mouth  organs  in  general,  but  not  the 
specific  urodele  mouth  organs.  The  character  of  the  recipient  tissues,  and  in 
particular  the  characteristics  determined  by  the  organismal  differentials  or 
their  precursors  inherent  in  the  transplant,  determine  what  species  charac- 
teristics these  organs  shall  possess.  It  is,  of  course,  possible,  although  not  very 
probable,  that  in  addition  to  the  organizer  substances,  other  less  specific  factors 
localized  and  inherent  in  the  mouth  region,  participate  in  bringing  about  this 

result. 

These  findings  again  show  the  intimate  connection  which  exists  between 
the  organizers,  whose  functioning  leads  to  the  development  of  specific  tissues 
and  organs,  and  the  organismal  differentials.  A  similar  connection  was  noted 
in  the  case  of  inductions  produced  in  the  transplant  by  the  host  tissues,  or  in 
the  host  tissues  by  the  transplant,  in  phylogenetically  primitive  classes  of 
animals.  Here,  also,  we  observed  that  the  species  characteristics  of  the  strange 
tissues  were  fixed,  but  that  the  determination  of  the  kind  of  organ  which  was 
to  develop  was  influenced  by  the  inducting  substances  which  asserted  them- 
selves, notwithstanding  the  strangeness  of  the  organismal  differentials. 

While  we  have  so  far  reviewed  only  experiments  in  amphibia,  in  principle, 
similar  conclusions  hold  good  also  in  other  classes  of  animals.  Thus  in  the 
chick  embryo  at  the  stage  of  the  primitive  streak  formation,  the  potentiality 
of  embryonal  parts  to   form  various  tissues  and  organs  is  greater  than  is 
indicated  by  the  tissues  and  organs  which  actually  are  produced  during  normal 
embryonal  development.  This  fact  has  been  established  by  means  of  trans- 
plantation of  parts  of  the  embryo  into  the  chorio-allantois  of  the  chick  embryo. 
In  this  way  it  has  been  found,  for  instance,  that  heart  can  be  produced  at  three 
different  levels,  and  gut  may  develop  from  all  levels  of  the  primitive  streak. 
The  portion  anterior  to  the  pit  can  produce  liver  and  mesonephros  and  the 
portion  posterior  to  the  pit  can  produce  adrenal    (Hunt).   In  the  normal 
embryo  substances  are  presumably  given  off  by  tissues,  which  inhibit  the 
development  of  certain  neighboring  tissues  and  organs  in  a  similar  manner  to 
that  noted  in  the  two-cell  stage  of  echinoderm  eggs,  when  one  blastomere 
inhibits  the  other  from  developing  into  a  whole  embryo.  But  other  tissues  which 
normally  develop  in  the  embryo  in  a  certain  place,  may  not  develop  if  isolated 
parts  of  the  embryos  are  transplanted,  perhaps  because  under  the  conditions 
of  isolation  needed  organizer  substances  may  be  lacking.  Furthermore,  we  may 
assume  that  the  ability  of  the  embryo  to  form  tissues  varies  in  the  direction 
from  the  oral  to  the  aboral  pole  of  the  primitive  streak  and  also  in  a  lateral 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  271 

direction.  The  more  anteriorly  a  tissue  is  situated,  the  greater  is  the  variety 
of  tissues  which  it  is  able  to  produce ;  in  the  posterior  direction  the  frequency 
and  completeness  in  the  production  of  such  a  variety  of  tissue  are,  step  by 
step,  decreased.  We  have  evidently  to  deal  with  a  multiplicity  of  factors 
which  determine  the  formation  of  these  structures  and  which  also  bring  about 
in  the  course  of  embryonal  development  a  gradually  diminishing  receptiveness 
of  the  tissues  to  the  stimuli  of  the  organizers. 

In  some  respects  we  observe  here,  in  principle,  the  same  conditions  which 
we  found  in  the  cervix  of  the  guinea  pig,  where  there  is  a  gradual  decrease 
in  the  potency  of  the  tissues  in  one  direction  to  form  uterine  structures,  and 
in  the  other  direction  to  form  vaginal  structures  under  the  influence  of  hor- 
mones. We  may  consider  uterus  and  vagina  as  representing  two  opposite 
poles.  In  passing  from  one  pole  to  the  other,  or  in  the  opposite  direction,  there 
is  a  graded  change  in  structure  and  in  mode  of  reaction  to  hormones. 

Thus  it  is  seen  that  there  is  a  close  correspondence  between  the  action  of 
organizers  and  that  of  well  known  hormones,  which  occur  in  invertebrates 
as  well  as  in  vertebrates,  but  which  have  best  been  studied  in  mammals.  The 
organizers  represent  hormones  which  are  present  and  act  locally  in  contact 
with  the  recipient  tissue,  in  contradistinction  to  distance  hormones,  which  act 
after  being  carried  to  a  distant  recipient  organ;  the  former  are  contact  hor- 
mones produced  in  the  cells  and  causing  cytoplasmic  differentiations  in  certain 
responsive  tissues  with  which  they  are  in  contact.  These  organizers  are  devoid 
of  the  finer  organismal  differentials  and  there  are  indications  that  they  may 
not  possess  any  organismal  differentials. 

Further  instances  of  correspondence  in  the  action  of  contact  and  distance 
substances  may  be  cited :  In  the  case  of  the  corpus  luteum  it  has  been  shown, 
in  the  guinea  pig,  that  a  very  interesting  correlation  exists  between  the  time 
during  which  the  hormone  produces  the  maximum  effect  on  the  recipient 
tissue,  namely,  the  uterine  mucosa,  and  the  period  during  which  such  a  hor- 
mone effect  is  needed  for  the  embedding  of  the  fertilized  ovum.  It  is  only  at 
a  time  when  the  hormone  is  produced  in  full  strength  that  the  tissue  exhibits 
its  full  responsiveness.  After  the  period  has  passed  during  which  the  egg  nor- 
mally attaches  itself,  the  recipient  tissue  loses  its  responsiveness  to  less  specific 
stimuli  to  which  it  was  formerly  responsive,  presumably  because  the  quantity 
of  hormone  necessary  for  sensitization  of  the  tissue  is  diminished,  or  because 
a  refractory  state  develops  in  the  uterine  mucosa. 

A  somewhat  similar  condition  exists  in  the  relation  between  organizer  and 
recipient  embryonal  tissue.  Here,  as  Lehmann  has  pointed  out,  the  time  during 
which  the  organizer  is  produced  in  maximal  quantity  in  the  upper  lip  of  the 
gastrula  of  a  certain  species  corresponds  to  the  time  when  the  ectoderm  of  the 
gastrula,  which  is  the  recipient  embryonal  tissue,  is  responsive  to  the  action 
of  the  organizer.  This  correspondence  applies,  however,  only  if  organizer 
and  recipient  tissue  belong  to  the  same  species ;  it  does  not  apply  if  organizer 
and  recipient  tissue  are  derived  from  distantly  related  species ;  in  the  latter 
case,  abnormalities  may  result. 

There  are,  however,  other  cases  in  which  a  hormone  is  still  produced  at  a 


272  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

time  when  the  recipient  tissue  has  already  lost  its  ability  to  interact  with  this 
hormone.  Thus  the  anterior  pituitary  may  continue  to  produce  follicle-stimu- 
lating hormone  in  old  persons,  at  a  time  when  the  ovary  no  longer  possesses 
the  structures  which  are  able  to  react  with  this  hormone.  In  a  comparable 
manner,  according  to  Mangold,  the  epidermis  of  axolotls  is  unable  to  respond 
with  the  production  of  a  balancer  at  a  time  when  the  adequate  organizer  is 
present  in  the  archenteron  and  medullary  plate;  but  in  other  urodeles  the 
recipient  organ  may  actively  respond  to  the  presence  of  this  organizer. 

In  recent  years  it  has  been  discovered  that  there  are  hormones  which  medi- 
ate some  effects  of  genes  on  those  tissues  which  are  under  the  control  of  these 
genes  (Kiihn,  Ephrussi,  Beadle).  Such  hormones  develop,  therefore,  not 
under  the  influence  of  cytoplasmic,  but  of  nuclear  constituents.  They  may 
transmit  to  distant  places,  for  instance,  the  effects  of  genes  which  distinguish 
the  dominant  characteristic  of  a  wild  race  from  the  recessive  characteristics 
of  a  mutant  race.  These  gene-hormones  have  been  found  in  various  orders 
of  insects,  such  as  Ephestia,  Bombyx,  Habrobracon  and  Drosophila ;  they  may 
occur  in  certain  organs  (ovary,  testis,  brain),  or  in  the  body  fluids,  and  they 
can  be  conveyed  to  other  organisms  either  by  implantation  of  these  organs 
or  by  injections  of  the  bodyfluids.  If  the  hormone  is  transmitted  in  this  manner 
to  a  mutant  individual  which  lacks  the  gene  that  causes  the  development  of 
a  certain  eye  pigment,  it  acquires  now  the  ability  to  produce  the  eye  color  of 
the  dominant  race.  Such  genes  thus  seem  to  exert  their  effects  on  the  recipient 
tissues  by  means  of  hormone-like  substances  to  which  certain  tissues  have  a 
specific  affinity.  These  gene-hormones  are  not  species-specific;  they  may  be 
effective  even  in  different  orders  of  animals.  Ephestia  as  well  as  Habrobracon 
hormones  are  effective  in  Drosophila,  and  conversely,  Drosophila  hormones 
exert  typical  effects  in  Habrobracon  pupae.  It  is,  in  all  these  cases,  the  wild 
dark-eyed  type  which  possesses  a  hormone  which  is  lacking  in  the  mutant 
form.  As  to  the  chemical  constitution  of  such  hormones,  they  seem  to  be 
neither  protein  nor  lipoid;  they,  as  well  as  the  organizers,  apparently  lack 
organismal  differentials. 

We  see,  then,  that  the  organizers,  on  which  the  organ  formation  in  the 
embryo  depends  to  a  large  extent,  and  the  substances,  by  means  of  which  the 
genes  produce  their  effects  during  embryonal  or  larval  life,  are  both  hormone- 
like and  do  not  possess  the  organismal  differentials;  whereas  the  substances 
from  which  they  are  derived,  the  cytoplasm  of  embryonal  tissues  and  organs 
and  the  genes  of  the  chromosomes,  have  a  complex  structure  and  do  possess 
organismal  differentials  or  their  precursors.  Likewise,  the  substratum  on 
which  they  act  are  bearers  of  organismal  differentials  or  their  precursors. 
The  cytoplasm  is  the  more  specific  material  which  has  the  potentiality  to 
develop  and  differentiate  within  certain  limits  under  the  influence  of  these 
hormone-like  inductor  substances.  The  latter  induce  the  development  of  organ 
systems  in  an  orderly  fashion,  in  accordance  with  the  organismal  differentials 
of  the  species  and  the  individual  in  which  they  act.  Both  the  precursors  of  the 
organizers  and  the  organismal  differentials  are  presumably  present  in  the 
fertilized  ovum.  In  the  course  of  embryonal  life  the  organ  precursors  and  the 


ORGANIZERS  AND  TISSUE  DIFFERENTIATION  273 

organizers  which  they  contain  develop  step  by  step ;  they  become  distinct  for 
each  organ,  until  in  the  end  the  complete  set  of  organs  and  organ  differentials 
has  fully  developed.  At  the  same  time,  also,  the  precursor  substances  of  the 
organismal  differentials  develop  and  differentiate  into  finer  differentials,  until 
in  the  end  the  structures  characteristic  of  the  individuality  have  fully  formed 
in  the  substratum.  It  may  be  assumed  that  the  coarser  organ  differentials, 
organizers  and  organismal  differentials  develop  first  and  that  only  at  later 
periods  of  ontogenesis  the  finer  chemical  structures  differentiate  in  the  case 
of  both  the  organ  and  organismal  differentials.  While  these  two  sets  of  dif- 
ferentials have  thus  certain  important  characteristics  in  common,  they  differ 
in  their  chemical  constitution  as  well  as  in  their  distribution.  Whereas  the 
organ  differentials  and  their  precursors  differ  in  every  organ  and  tissue,  the 
organismal  differentials  are  the  same  in  all  parts  of  an  organism.  We  may 
perhaps  tentatively  assume  that  on  a  common  chemical  basis,  which  is  the 
bearer  of  the  organismal  differentials,  there  are  superimposed  in  various 
places  chemical  structures  which  correspond  to  the  various  organ  differentials. 
While  the  general  design  of  the  latter  is  similar  in  nearly  related  organisms, 
differences  develop  corresponding  to  the  distance  in  relationship  between  the 
organismal  differentials.  The  finest,  the  least  noticeable  differences  are  found 
between  the  organs  and  tissues  of  nearly  related  individuals.  Yet,  the  wider 
pattern  of  the  embryonal  development' of  the  organs  and  organ  differential 
substances,  which  takes  place  by  means  of  self-differentiation  and  with  the 
aid  of  organizers,  is  similar  throughout  the  whole  animal  series ;  this  applies 
especially  to  the  coarser,  more  basic  organ  and  tissue  structures,  while  with 
progressing  ontogenetic  development  a  greater  differentiation  sets  in  in  the 
development  of  organs.  These  developmental  similarities  are  maintained,  not- 
withstanding the  differences  which  exist  as  to  the  precursor  substances  char- 
acterizing the  germ  cells  of  the  various  classes,  species  and  individuals.  The 
organs  and  their  differentials  undergo  graded  changes  during  embryonal  life 
and  they  are  readily  accessible  to  modification  within  a  certain  range,  under 
the  influence  of  alterations  in  the  inner  or  outer  environment.  The  organismal 
differentials,  on  the  other  hand,  although  they  also  differentiate  in  the  course 
of  embryonal  development,  are,  as  far  as  is  known,  much  more  stable  and 
much  less  readily  accessible  to  environmental  influences ;  however,  during  this 
period  the  character  of  the  organismal  differentials  limits  also  the  variability 
of  the  organs  which  may  occur.  Differences  in  organismal  differentials  which 
the  organizer  tissue  and  the  recipient  tissue  may  possess  do  not  preclude  the 
effective  action  of  organizers,  but  the  tissue  and  organ  differentials  can  de- 
velop only  within  the  range  prescribed  by  the  nature  of  the  organismal  dif- 
ferentials of  the  recipient  tissue. 

We  have  seen  that  in  the  adult  mammalian  organism  a  tissue  equilibrium 
is  established,  which  is  strictly  autogenous ;  the  integrity  of  tissue  boundaries, 
the  normal  interaction  of  tissues,  depend  upon  the  presence  of  the  same 
autogenous  differential  in  all  the  adjoining  tissues.  On  this  autogenous  char- 
acter depends  the  maintenance  of  the  normal  tissue  equilibrium  and  the  normal 
function  of  tissues.  There  is  a  good  deal  of  evidence  that  in  the  adult  mam- 


274  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

malian  organism,  also,  some  special  substances  are  given  off  by  tissues  which 
influence  the  state  of  adjoining  tissues.  They  may  be  contact  substances, 
comparable  in  certain  respects  to  the  organizers  of  embryonal  tissues.  Thus, 
the  egg  in  the  ovary  may  stimulate  the  growth  of  the  surrounding  follicular 
granulosa  and  the  state  of  the  parenchyma  may  change  the  condition  of  the 
surrounding  stroma;  but  also,  the  blood  vessels  and  their  permeability  may 
affect  the  stroma  in  which  they  are  embedded,  and  by  way  of  the  stroma  they 
may  affect  even  the  parenchyma.  Local  defects  may  alter  the  tissue  equilibrium, 
inducing  tissue  growth,  and  even  without  such  defects  neighboring  pigmented 
epidermis  may,  under  certain  conditions,  invade  unpigmented  epidermis.  In  a 
similar  maner  the  squamous  epithelium  of  the  cervix,  which  develops  under 
the  influence  of  hormones,  may  act  towards  the  neighboring  cylindrical  epi- 
thelium of  the  uterus.  These  exists,  in  all  probability,  other  local  mechanisms 
which  maintain  the  tissue  equilibrium  in  addition  to  the  action  of  hormones 
originating  in  distant  places.  We  may  then  conclude  that  the  normal  tissue 
equilibrium  depends  (1)  upon  the  action  of  autogenous  differentials,  which 
all  tissues  possess,  and  (2)  upon  a  variety  of  other  effects,  among  which  the 
action  of  some  special  hormone-like  contact  substances  as  well  as  typical 
hormones  play  a  prominent  role.  There  is  thus  a  certain  correspondence  be- 
tween the  factors  which  determine  the  interaction  of  embryonal  tissues  and 
those  which  determine  the  autogenous  equilibrium  of  the  adult  higher  or- 
ganisms. 


Chapter  6 

Regeneration,  Transplantation,  and  the 
Autogenous  Tissue  Equilibrium 

IN  earlier  periods  of  the  experimental  study  of  transplantation  a  dis- 
cussion arose  between  two  French  biologists,  Yves  Delage  and  Giard, 
as  to  the  relation  which  exists  between  transplantation  and  regeneration. 
Yves  Delage  maintained  that  there  is  an  antagonism  between  these  two  proc- 
esses. He  based  this  conclusion  on  the  very  great  regenerative  potency  in 
lower  organisms,  such  as  planarians  and  lumbricidae,  which  renders  trans- 
plantation difficult,  because  the  new  tissue  developing  in  or  near  the  surface, 
which  separates  host  and  transplant,  tends  to  push  off  the  transplant.  Plants, 
on  the  other  hand,  in  which  the  tendency  to  regeneration  is  very  slight,  are 
very  suitable  for  grafting.  However,  according  to  Giard,  such  an  antagonism 
does  not  exist.  He  cited  the  fact  that  in  tunicates,  sponges  and  corals,  where 
the  regenerative  power  is  great,  transplantation  can  readily  be  accomplished. 
In  previous  chapters  we  have  mentioned  the  importance  of  regenerative 
processes  in  the  fate  of  transplants;  we  shall  now  consider  these  facts  in  a 
connected  way,  because  they  have  an  important  bearing  on  the  establishment 
of  the  autogenous  equilibrium  in  higher  organisms,  which  holds  together  the 
various  organs  and  tissues,  as  well  as  different  parts,  in  the  same  organ  or 
tissue,  and  unites  them  into  one  individual.  This  equilibrium  is  autogenous  in 
higher  organisms,  because  adjoining  tissues  need  to  possess  the  same  individu- 
ality differential.  The  proof  of  the  existence  of  such  an  equilibrium  is  based 
largely  on  the  absence  of  regenerative  growth  phenomena  whenever  adjoining 
autogenous  tissues  or  constituents  of  the  same  tissue  balance  one  another  in 
such  a  way  that  there  is  a  relative  state  of  rest  and  a  lack  of  interference  with 
the  neighboring  tissues.  To  such  a  state  of  formative  equilibrium  there  must 
correspond  a  similar  equilibrized  state  of  metabolic  and  functional  interactions 
of  tissues;  whenever  a  replacement  of  the  autogenous  tissue  constituents  by 
homoiogenous  constituents  alters  this  equilibrium,  regenerative  movements 
and  growth  tend  to  take  place,  and  thus  antagonisms  between  adjoining  tissues 
may  become  manifest ;  these  changes  may  be  taken  as  an  indication  that  an 
autogenous  equilibrium  has  existed  before  the  disturbances  became  manifest. 
As  the  following  discussion  will  show,  in  certain  respects  there  does  exist  an 
antagonism  between  the  regenerative  activity  of  the  host  and  the  successful 
outcome  of  transplantation.  There  are  conditions  in  which  the  tendency  of 
the  host  to  regenerate  may  be  responsible  for  the  casting  off  or  the  resorption 
of  the  transplant;  but,  on  the  other  hand,  there  are  also  conditions  in  which 
the  transplant  may  prevent  regenerative  processes  in  the  host ;  this  it  may  do 
if,  owing  to  the  nature  of  the  organismal  and  organ  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant,   the   contact   mechanisms   at  the  point  of  junction  between  the 

275 


276  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

partners  are  adequate  and  exert  a  mutually  balancing  effect.  As  stated  pre- 
viously, there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  normal  contact  mechanisms 
depend  at  least  partly  on  the  interaction  of  adequate  contact  substances. 

The  conditions  prevailing  at  the  point  of  junction  may  influence  the  occur- 
rence or  non-occurrence  of  regeneration  in  one  of  three  ways:  (1)  The 
presence  of  adequate  contact  mechanisms  or  contact  substances  may  prevent 
regeneration  directly  by  insuring  a  relative  state  of  rest;  conversely,  the 
absence  of  such  mechanisms  or  substances  may  directly  cause  regenerative 
processes  to  set  in;  (2)  the  absence  of  adequate  contact  mechanisms  may 
lead  primarily  to  the  loosening  of  the  connection  between  transplant  and  host, 
and  this  may  be  followed  by  regeneration.  In  both  of  these  cases  we  have 
presumably  to  deal  with  specific  actions  of  a  chemical  nature;  (3)  the  ap- 
proximation of  the  surfaces  of  contact  may  directly  inhibit  regeneration  in  a 
simple  mechanical  way  by  exerting  pressure.  In  addition,  we  have  to  consider 
the  growth  momentum  of  both  host  tissue  and  transplant;  the  greater  the 
growth  momentum,  the  greater  must  be  the  forces  that  tend  to  repress  regen- 
eration, other  conditions  being  equal. 

While  actual  experience  has  proven  the  mutual  antagonism  between  re- 
generative activity  and  successful  transplantation,  other  factors  tend  to  make 
regenerative  processes  favorable  to  transplantation.  Thus  a  slight  degree  of 
regenerative  activity  in  many  instances  is  needed  for  and  makes  possible  the 
joining  together  of  host  and  transplant.  There  may  exist,  besides,  an  indirect 
relation  between  the  degree  of  transplantability  and  the  degree  of  regenera- 
tive activity  which  host  and  transplant  exhibit;  it  depends  upon  the  frequent 
association  of  great  regenerative  power  of  organisms  and  their  constituent 
parts,  with  a  primitive,  less  complex  constitution  and  a  correspondingly  lower 
degree  of  sensitiveness  to  differences  in  organismal  differentials.  There  is 
noticeable,  therefore,  particularly  in  phylogenetically  and  ontogenetically  more 
primitive  organisms,  a  greater  mutual  adaptability  between  transplant  and 
host,  and  a  greater  ability  of  the  transplant  to  withstand  the  injuries  con- 
nected with  the  process  of  grafting,  especially  during  the  first  critical  period 
following  transplantation  when  the  nourishment  of  the  grafts  may  as  yet  be 
inadequate.  But  where  the  opposite  conditions  prevail,  where  there  is  a  lack 
of  regenerative  ability  associated  with  a  great  sensitiveness  of  the  tissues  to 
injuries,  transplantation  may  be  impossible,  as,  for  example,  in  the  case  of 
the  adult  mammalian  ganglia  cells  of  the  central  nervous  system. 

It  was  presumably  the  difference  in  point  of  view  between  Yves  Delage 
and  Giard  which,  more  recently,  suggested  to  Weiss  the  analysis  of  the  factors 
on  which  the  antagonism  between  regeneration  and  transplantation  depends. 
In  Salamander  larvae,  amputation  of  an  extremity  is  followed  by  regeneration 
of  a  new  extremity;  but  if,  according  to  Weiss,  another  extremity  of  such 
a  larva  is  transplanted  onto  the  wound,  regeneration  is  completely  prevented, 
provided  the  new  extremity  fits  the  defect  anatomically  as  well  as  functionally ; 
however,  if  the  covering  of  the  wound  by  the  surface  of  the  transplant  is 
incomplete,  wound  healing  may  take  place  at  first,  but  then  regeneration  may 
set  in,  and  even  if  it  is  rudimentary  or  retarded,  the  transplant  is  cast  off. 


REGENERATION  AND  TISSUE  EQUILIBRIUM  277 

These  observations  agree  with  those  of  Morgan,  who  previously  noted  that 
if,  in  tadpoles,  a  tail  is  cut  off  and  the  cut-off  tail  of  another  larva  is  grafted 
onto  the  wound,  regeneration  does  not  occur  on  the  cut  surfaces,  although 
both  the  stump  and  the  grafted  tail  have  the  power  to  regenerate. 

Similar  results  were  obtained  in  anuran  amphibia  by  Graper.  Transplanta- 
tion of  extremity  buds  on  stumps  of  limbs  succeeded,  but  regeneration  was 
prevented  thereby  only  if  the  orientation  of  the  cut  surfaces  of  host  and 
transplant  to  each  other  was  correct.  If  the  two  surfaces  were  not  adequate, 
the  transplant  either  changed  in  such  a  way  that  it  became  secondarily  ad- 
justed to  the  host  and  was  transformed  into  the  right  kind  of  extremity,  or, 
if  this  did  not  take  place,  there  was  a  regeneration  of  the  original  limb,  not- 
withstanding the  presence  of  the  graft.  Of  special  interest  is  the  fact  that  in 
case  of  a  disharmonious  character  of  the  cut  surfaces  a  regenerative  growth 
occurred,  which  did  not  need  to  be  restricted  to  the  cut  surfaces  but  which 
took  place  even  at  some  distance  in  the  transplanted  limb.  We  have  already 
referred  to  similar  results  when  we  discussed  regeneration  in  primitive  adult 
invertebrates,  where  likewise  an  outgrowth  may  take  place  at  some  distance 
from  the  place  of  union  of  the  two  pieces,  a  contact  effect  apparently  having 
been  propagated  from  the  directly  affected  area  to  nearby  parts.  Therefore, 
according  to  Graper  and  Weiss,  a  satisfactory  axial  orientation  between  trans- 
plant and  host  is  essential  if  regeneration  is  to  be  suppressed.  An  arm  can 
inhibit  the  regeneration  of  a  posterior  extremity,  provided  the  axes  in  host 
and  transplant  have  an  analogous  orientation.  If  the  transplantation  occurred 
not  directly  at  the  point  where  a  part  of  the  limb  had  been  cut  off,  but  at  some 
distance  from  it,  in  the  direction  towards  the  head  in  the  branchial  region,  the 
tendency  to  regeneration  was  greater,  but  in  principle  the  same  competitive 
struggle  took  place  between  the  prospective  or  early  regenerate  and  the  trans- 
plant, and  in  certain  cases  both  pieces,  regenerate  and  transplant,  coalesced. 
The  transplant,  even  if  it  did  not  succeed  in  suppressing  the  regeneration,  was 
able  in  some  instances  to  make  it  less  perfect. 

In  many  other  experiments,  also,  especially  those  of  Harrison,  success  in 
the  grafting  of  extremities  in  amphibian  larvae  depended  largely  upon  the 
fulfillment  of  the  condition  that  the  transplant  satisfy  the  tendency  of  the  host 
to  form  a  certain  type  of  extremity ;  unless  the  transplant  conformed  to  this 
condition,  the  reaction  of  the  host  tissue  was  unfavorable  to  a  permanent  union. 
In  these  cases  we  have,  it  seems,  to  deal  with  specific  interactions  between 
host  and  transplant  at  the  point  of  contact.  But  homoiogenous  tissue  of  a 
different  kind,  such  as  transplanted  living  skin,  may  also  exert  an  inhibiting 
effect  on  the  regeneration  of  extremities.  Thus  Harrison  and  Detwiler  found 
in  embryos  of  Amblystoma  that  the  regeneration  of  limbs  which  had  been 
excised,  can,  to  some  extent,  be  inhibited  if  the  wound  is  covered  with 
homoiogenous  skin,  and  it  can  be  entirely  prevented  if  the  wound  and  the  size 
of  the  skin  subsequently  grafted  onto  the  wound  are  very  extensive. 

However,  there  are  several  investigations  which  make  it  very  probable  that 
in  addition  to  these  specific  contact  actions,  also  purely  mechanical,  non- 
specific factors  may  play  a  part  in  preventing  regeneration.  Thus  Schaxel 


278  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

observed  that  the  covering  of  a  wound  in  Siredon  pisciformis  not  only  with 
transplanted  living  skin,  which  heals  on  rapidly,  but  also  with  dead  material, 
may  prevent  regeneration.  In  this  case  purely  mechanical  factors  are  probably 
responsible  for  the  result  and  we  might  even  conclude  that  if  the  organismal 
or  organ  differentials  are  active  after  transplantation  of  extremities,  their 
effect  is  only  an  indirect  one,  permitting  the  graft  to  remain  in  perfect  apposi- 
tion to  the  wound  and  thus  to  exert  the  needed  mechanical  pressure;  but  if 
the  differentials  are  not  compatible  with  each  other  and  the  right  contact 
substances  do  not  interact  in  the  area  of  the  wound,  then  the  transplant  is  not 
able  to  exert  the  required  mechanical  pressure  on  the  wound  surface  and 
regeneration  takes  place.  But,  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  type  of 
inhibition  of  the  regenerative  process  which  occurred  in  Schaxel's  experiment 
is  different  from  that  caused  by  the  transplantation  of  an  extremity  bud.  In 
the  former  case  regeneration  was  not  actually  prevented ;  it  began  to  take 
place  and  then  the  pressure  of  the  scar-tissue  apparently  did  not  allow  the 
regenerating  extremity  to  break  through.  Therefore,  in  this  instance  the 
regenerative  processes  were  presumably  merely  inhibited  and  made  abnormal 
by  the  mechanical  pressure  of  the  overlying  skin.  Perhaps  the  inhibition  of 
the  development  of  transplanted  buds  of  extremities  was  also  a  pressure 
effect  of  the  overlying  skin,  although  here  the  homoiogenous  nature  of  the 
transplanted  skin  may  also  have  played  a  role.  On  the  other  hand,  if  two 
well-fitting  surfaces  of  extremities  or  tails  are  joined  together,  even  the 
beginning  of  regeneration  can  be  obviated.  In  this  case  we  have  probably  to 
deal  with  specific  contact  effects  rather  than  with  non-specific  mechanical 
pressure. 

In  accordance  with  this  interpretation,  and  somewhat  different  from  the 
conclusions  suggested  by  the  experiments  of  Schaxel,  are  the  results  obtained 
by  Godlewski,  who  noted  that  only  living  tissue,  especially  skin  with  the 
underlying  cutis,  was  able  to  prevent  regeneration  of  a  tail  in  axolotl ;  further- 
more, only  auto-  and  homoiotransplants,  or  transplants  belonging  to  different 
races  but  to  the  same  species,  were  effective.  Thus,  according  to  Godlewski, 
skin  of  the  white  axolotl  grafted  onto  wounds  in  the  black  axolotl  prevented 
regeneration  of  the  tail  in  the  latter,  which  would  otherwise  have  followed 
an  amputation.  Godlewski  assumes  that  this  result  is  due  to  the  specific  effect 
of  the  cutis,  which  remains  alive  after  transplantation  and  which  prevents  the 
epidermis  from  growing  down  into  the  underlying  coagulum  and  initiating 
the  regenerative  process.  As  usual,  under  similar  conditions  the  inhibition  of 
regeneration  is  complete  only  if  the  wound  has  been  covered  in  an  exact  man- 
ner. If  certain  small  areas  have  been  left  uncovered,  finger-like,  thin,  prolifer- 
ative buds  may  grow  out. 

However,  there  is  considerable  difference  in  the  conclusions  of  various 
investigators  as  to  the  manner  in  which  the  regeneration  of  the  extremity 
takes  place.  We  may  cite  the  more  recent  experiments  of  Harrison,  who  be- 
lieves that  the  extremity  is  produced  by  the  mesenchyme  of  the  extremity  bud 
and  not  by  the  ectoderm.  Still,  the  ectoderm  may  exert  some  influence  on  the 
formation  of  the  limb  and  different  types  of  ectoderm  may  vary  in  the  effects 


REGENERATION  AND  TISSUE  EQUILIBRIUM  279 

which  they  produce.  While  ectoderm  taken  from  the  area  covering  the  devel- 
oping extremities  may  favor  the  regenerative  growth  of  embryonal  buds,  or 
at  least  does  not  inhibit  it,  ectoderm  taken  from  the  head  region  does  inhibit 
it,  but  only  if  this  ectoderm  has  reached  a  certain  stage  of  development. 
Similarly,  Mangold  observed  that  the  epidermis  of  Axolotl,  which  does  not 
possess  the  ability  to  produce  a  balancer,  may  exert  an  inhibiting  effect  on  skin 
which  otherwise  would  be  able  to  produce  this  organ.  We  would  have,  then, 
in  this  case,  to  deal  with  specific  effects  of  the  transplanted  epidermis  on  the 
regenerative  process  and  not  with  non-specific  pressure  effects;  but  while 
these  relations  between  epidermis  and  underlying  cutis  are  specific  and  not 
purely  mechanical  in  their  action,  they  are  specific  in  a  particular  way  and 
not  exactly  identical  with  the  effects  observed  by  Weiss  and  others.  There 
are  involved,  here,  tissue  equilibria  of  a  special  nature.  According  to  the 
observations  of  Weiss,  a  transplant  inhibits  even  the  onset  of  regeneration 
if  the  two  surfaces  joining  transplant  and  host  are  mutually  perfectly  ade- 
quate. Under  these  circumstances  a  very  rapid  union  between  the  two  pieces 
takes  place.  We  may  assume  that  the  transplant  brings  about  the  same  condi- 
tion at  the  point  of  junction  which  would  prevent  regenerative  growth  proc- 
esses in  this  area  in  the  normal  intact  organism ;  in  the  latter,  the  normal 
neighboring  tissue  exerts  presumably  the  same  kind  of  inhibiting  contact 
effects  as  does  the  grafted,  strange  tissue  under  experimental  conditions. 
Inasmuch  as  in  many  of  these  experiments  there  are  successful  homoiotrans- 
plantations,  we  may  furthermore  conclude  that  even  homoiogenous  differen- 
tials make  possible  these  normal  interactions  of  equilibrating  contact  mecha- 
nisms in  amphibia,  and  also  that  a  very  brief  interruption  of  the  contact  action, 
such  as  occurs  during  the  excision  of  a  piece  of  tissue  and  the  grafting  of 
another  piece  in  its  place,  is  not  sufficient  to  initiate  growth  processes.  But 
if  these  contact  actions  are  not  completely  adequate,  graded  differences  in 
incompatibility  may  exist  in  different  cases  between  transplant  and  host  and 
then  it  is  possible  for  the  regenerative  outgrowth  of  the  host  tissue  to  take 
place  even  at  a  time  when  the  union  with  the  transplant  has  become  already 
so  firm  that  this  outgrowth  is  unable  to  induce  the  casting  off  of  the  trans- 
plant ;  instead,  a  struggle  may  develop  between  the  two  tissues  and  the  trans- 
plant may  be  pushed  sidewise  by  the  regenerating  host  tissue,  so  that  in  the 
end  it  forms  an  appendage  to  the  regenerated  extremity  and  a  double  forma- 
tion is  produced.  In  this  case  the  mutual  antagonism  between  host  and  trans- 
plant manifests  itself  in  an  inhibition  of  growth  of  the  transplant;  but  the 
more  subtle  mechanisms  of  attack  by  means  of  specialized  cells  of  the  host, 
which  we  can  observe  in  mammalian  transplantation,  are,  as  yet,  apparently 
lacking  in  these  more  primitive  organisms. 

Similarly  in  the  experiments  of  Milojevich,  who  used  Triton  extremities 
directly  after  metamorphosis,  the  surface  of  an  extremity  was  partly,  but  not 
entirely,  inhibited  from  growing  out  by  grafting  onto  it  the  regenerative  bud 
of  another  Triton  limb.  If  the  latter  was  at  such  an  early  stage  of  development 
that  the  tissue  differentials  had  not  yet  fully  formed,  then  the  outgrowing 
part  of  the  remnant  of  the  host  bud  and  the  grafted  bud  united  to  form  one 


280  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

extremity,  but  at  the  sides  where  the  grafted  limb  did  not  fully  cover  the 
remnant,  new  extremities  grew  out.  In  this  instance,  therefore,  the  inhibition 
exerted  by  the  graft  was  strictly  limited  to  the  place  of  contact.  If,  instead  of 
grafting  another  bud  onto  the  exposed  surface  of  the  regenerative  bud,  it  was 
completely  covered  with  a  piece  of  skin  or  with  a  layer  of  muscle  and  skin, 
the  regeneration  was  entirely  prevented.  Possibly  here  mechanical  factors 
also  played  a  role,  as  they  apparently  did  in  the  experiments  of  Schaxel. 

Another  interesting  example  of  the  antagonistic  action  between  transplant 
and  host,  and  the  latter's  tendency  to  grow  or  regenerate,  is  the  inhibiting 
effect  shown,  in  various  degrees,  by  the  morphogenic  gill  field  on  the  de- 
velopment of  transplanted  limbs.  In  the  presumptive  gill  region  ectoderm  and 
mesoderm  have  the  tendency  to  produce  gill  structures,  a  tendency  which 
is  graded  in  intensity  in  different  areas  (Ekman,  Detwiler)  ;  this  inhibiting 
effect  is  evidently  of  a  specific  nature  and  it  leads  to  a  struggle  between  the 
transplant  and  the  host  tissues,  which  mutually  antagonize  each  other  in  the 
realization  of  their  morphogenic  tendencies.  These  effects  consist  presumably 
in  contact  actions.  Very  fine  differentiations  which  take  place  during  em- 
bryonal development  in  this  area  are  made  manifest  by  means  of  transplan- 
tation, and  they  determine  the  character  of  the  contact  actions.  Thus,  in 
general,  the  nearer  the  ectoderm  used  for  transplantation  is  situated  to  the  gill 
region  in  the  donor,  the  more  it  is  forced  to  conform  to  the  influences  exerted 
by  the  underlying  tissues  in  this  area,  which  tend  to  convert  the  transplant 
into  gill  structures  and  at  the  same  time  to  suppress  limb  formation. 

The  specificity  of  the  factors  which  are  active  in  the  inhibition  of  regenera- 
tion is,  perhaps,  most  convincingly  demonstrated  in  some  experiments  of 
Harrison,  which  concern  the  production  of  heteromorphic  tails  in  larvae  of 
Rana.  Two  anterior  parts  of  these  larvae  were  united,  each  with  the  aboral 
pole  of  the  other.  If  a  piece  was  cut  off  from  one  of  the  combined  anterior 
parts  a  tail  regenerated,  in  which  the  medulla  of  the  head  part,  which  had 
been  left  intact — the  new  host — and  that  of  the  second  partner — the  graft — 
and  its  regenerate  were  united,  but  in  which  the  chordae  were  not  united. 
Under  these  conditions  the  free  end  of  the  chorda  of  the  dominating  host 
stimulated  regeneration  of  an  additional  tail,  which  possessed  chorda  but  in 
which  the  medulla  was  lacking.  Evidently  the  surface  of  the  medulla  in  the 
graft,  which  fitted  the  surface  of  the  medulla  in  the  host  and  regenerate, 
prevented  a  new  regenerative  outgrowth  of  the  medulla  of  the  host  into  the 
additional  tail.  On  the  other  hand,  the  surface  of  the  chorda,  not  being  in- 
hibited by  contact  with  a  suitable  surface  of  chorda  tissue,  regenerated  and 
gave  rise  to  the  newformation  of  a  tail.  In  this  case,  also,  the  inhibition  must 
have  been  of  a  specific  character ;  medulla  inhibited  medulla,  but  the  chorda, 
not  being  specifically  inhibited  by  an  adequate  surface  of  chorda,  grew  out 
and  gave  rise  to  regeneration.  Here  we  can  therefore  exclude  simple  mechani- 
cal factors  as  inhibitors  of  regeneration. 

Whether  there  will  be  compatibility  or  lack  of  compatibility  between  host 
and  transplant  depends  also  upon  the  degree  of  self-differentiation  which  has 
been  reached  in  the  development  of  both  host  and  transplanted  tissues.  As 


REGENERATION  AND  TISSUE  EQUILIBRIUM  281 

long  as  the  material  entering  into  these  reactions  is  still  plastic,  adaptable,  and 
not  yet  definitely  fixed  and  differentiated,  especially  in  the  transplant,  there 
is  less  likelihood  that  incompatibilities  will  develop,  than  at  later  stages  when 
differentiation  into  the  more  rigid  structures  has  already  occurred. 

We  find,  therefore,  very  complex  interactions  between  transplant  and  ad- 
joining host  tissue,  and  the  effects  exerted  by  neighboring  tissues  upon  each 
other  depend  not  only  on  the  kind  of  tissues  which  are  brought  into  contact 
with  each  other,  but  also  on  the  stage  of  development  and  differentiation  of 
these  interacting  tissues.  Thus  the  inhibiting  action  of  a  transplant  on  the 
regeneration  of  an  extremity  is  effective  only  in  the  first  phase  of  the  process 
of  regeneration ;  it  is  ineffective  if  the  transplantation  is  carried  out  at  a  later 
stage,  when  regeneration  is  already  under  way.  On  the  other  hand,  if  in  some 
manner,  as  for  instance  through  a  purely  mechanical  factor,  we  prevent  the 
regeneration  from  being  initiated,  all  subsequent  outgrowth  has,  by  these 
means,  been  made  impossible.  Perhaps  the  ability  to  regenerate  depends  upon 
the  presence  and  activity  of  a  sensitizing  substance,  which  may  be  lost  or 
neutralized  after  a  definite  time  has  elapsed.  This  would  represent  a  condition 
analogous  to  that  observed  in  mammalian  organisms,  where  a  placentoma  can 
develop  only  at  the  stage  of  the  sexual  cycle  when  the  sensitizing  substance 
given  off  by  the  corpus  luteum  has  become  active.  The  effect  of  certain  contact 
actions  would  then  perhaps  consist  in  a  neutralization  of  the  influence  of 
sensitizing  and  stimulating  substances. 

It  follows  from  our  previous  discussions  that  these  contact  mechanisms 
between  adjoining  tissues  may  consist  in  the  giving-off  of  various  specific 
substances  corresponding  to  organizers,  to  sensitizing,  or,  under  some  con- 
ditions, also  to  inhibiting  substances  in  the  place  of  union.  In  addition,  the 
physical-chemical  structure  of  the  cut  surfaces  of  transplant  and  host  may 
be  of  importance,  in  accordance  with  Graper's  comparison  of  these  surfaces 
with  electro-magnetic  fields. 

The  importance  of  contact  effects  in  determining  the  fate  of  tissues  is 
indicated  also  in  some  experiments  of  Schaxel  with  transplantation  of  ex- 
tremities in  Axolotl.  If  buds  at  very  early  stages  of  regeneration  are  trans- 
planted into  a  further  developed  body  wall,  the  transplant  is  not  able  to  form 
an  extremity  through  self-differentiation;  it  is  prevented  from  doing  so  by 
the  organizer  action  of  the  strange  surrounding  host.  Instead,  the  transplants 
may  form  irregular  masses,  which  later  disappear;  but  further  differentiated 
regenerative  buds  transplanted  under  the  same  conditions  are  able  to  form 
extremities.  However,  if  an  early  regenerating  bud  is  transplanted  together 
with  the  surrounding  skin,  then  it  may  differentiate  into  the  typical  extremity ; 
apparently  its  own  skin  can  supply  the  needed  kind  of  contact  action,  which 
allows  it  to  differentiate  normally  and  to  maintain  itself  after  transplantation. 

We  can  understand  the  way  in  which  neighboring  tissues  exert  contact 
actions  upon  each  other,  presumably  through  the  giving-off  of  certain  sub- 
stances, if  we  consider  what  happens  at  certain  stages  of  metamorphosis.  In 
anuran  amphibia  the  gills  at  definite  periods  of  metamorphosis  secrete  a  sub- 
stance which  dissolves  the  overlying  skin.  Also,  transplanted  gills  exercise 


282  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

this  function,  but  later  on  they  lose  it.  In  these  instances  there  may  be  active 
the  secretion  of  an  acid  or  of  a  proteolytic  enzyme  possessing  the  power  of 
dissolving  the  skin  and  serving  as  a  contact  substance.  In  a  corresponding 
manner,  Helff  has  shown  that  it  is  due  to  absorption  processes  taking  place 
in  the  gills,  which  must  be  in  direct  contact  with  the  integument,  that  histolysis 
in  the  overlying  integument  is  initiated.  The  histolytic  influence  of  the  atro- 
phying gills  increases  at  first  as  metamorphosis  proceeds,  reaching  a  maximum 
just  prior  to  the  release  of  the  forelimb;  and  then  gradually  it  subsides  as  the 
gills  undergo  the  final  stage  of  atrophy. 

As  stated  previously,  we  think  it  justifiable  to  transfer  these  conceptions, 
derived  from  what  has  been  observed  under  experimental  conditions,  espe- 
cially those  prevailing  after  transplantation,  to  the  equilibrium,  which  exists 
normally  in  an  organism,  between  adjoining  tissues;  here  contact  substances, 
in  addition  to  hormones,  presumably  determine  the  tissue  equilibrium,  and 
disturbances  of  this  equilibrium  may  lead  to  extensive  regenerative  processes 
in  phylogenetically  or  ontogenetically  more  primitive  organisms,  and  to  simple 
wound  healing  in  the  more  differentiated  organisms.  Among  these  contact 
substances  the  organismal  as  well  as  organ  differentials  may  play  a  part,  the 
organismal  differentials  gaining  in  importance  with  increasing  phylogenetic 
and  ontogenetic  development. 

Certain  kinds  of  transplantation  in  the  more  primitive  classes  of  inverte- 
brates similarly  contribute  to  the  understanding  of  the  significance  and  origin 
of  regenerative  processes  at  or  near  the  point  of  junction  of  graft  and  host 
and  to  the  interpretation  of  the  factors  that  maintain  the  tissue  equilibrium 
within  the  same  individual.  We  have  seen  that  organismal  differentials  are 
of  importance  in  this  process,  as  are  also  correct  axis  orientation  and  polar 
direction  of  joined  parts.  This  is  true  especially  in  the  case  of  the  more  primi- 
tive invertebrates  as  well  as  of  plants.  If  the  cut  surfaces  do  not  fit  each  other 
completely,  a  regenerative  outgrowth  may  take  place  from  an  uncovered  point. 
Moreover,  in  vertebrates  as  well  as  in  invertebrates,  regenerative  processes 
may  proceed  not  only  directly  from  the  free  surfaces  of  injured  organisms, 
or  from  surfaces  exposed  after  incompatible  pieces  have  separated,  but  also 
from  totipotent  cells  which  migrate  to  the  exposed  surfaces.  Such  observa- 
tions have  been  made,  for  instance,  in  amphibia  by  Hellmich,  and  by  Spek 
and  others  in  the  ascidian  Clavelina.  In  the  latter  case,  under  various  condi- 
tions leading  to  budding,  certain  totipotent  cells  are  attracted  from  the  deeper 
tissues  to  that  point  of  the  body  where  the  growth  processes  are  to  take  place. 
It  may  be  assumed  here,  too,  that  certain  substances  rather  than  purely 
mechanical  factors  direct  the  movement  of  these  cells.  It  seems  that  the  sep- 
aration of  the  transplanted  parts  may  in  some  cases  constitute  the  primary 
process,  which  subsequently  is  followed  by  regeneration ;  but  in  other  cases, 
as  we  have  previously  pointed  out,  it  is  very  probable  that  incompatibilities 
between  the  joined  pieces  lead  to  regenerative  processes,  which  are  thus  pri- 
mary, and  that  these  are  followed  only  secondarily  by  a  separation  of  the  parts. 

Cell  equilibria  which  depend  upon  contact  influences  exerted  by  adjoining 
cells  upon  each  other,  determine  whether  one  or  more  embryos  shall  develop 


REGENERATION  AND  TISSUE  EQUILIBRIUM  283 

from  the  blastomeres ;  this  is  a  problem  which  we  have  already  discussed  in 
a  previous  chapter.  Developmental  processes  which  might  lead  to  the  forma- 
tion of  two  embryos  are  prevented  if  the  surfaces  of  the  blastomeres,  either 
derived  from  the  same  or  from  different  eggs,  are  oriented  to  each  other  in 
the  right  direction  and  if  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  joined  parts  are 
mutually  compatible.  Under  these  conditions  adjoining  cells,  even  if  they  were 
obtained  from  different  organisms,  may  restrain  each  other  from  carrying 
out  movements  and  from  undergoing  cell  divisions,  such  as  would  give  rise 
to  the  formation  of  a  whole  organism  from  one  of  the  partners;  instead,  the 
blastomeres  may  coordinate  the  activities  of  the  neighboring  cells  with  their 
own. 

However,  if  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  partners  are  unsuitable,  or 
if  the  axes  of  the  adjoining  segments  do  not  fit  each  other,  then  the  neighbor- 
ing segmented  cells  no  longer  exert  this  regulating  effect.  When  unsuitable 
heterodifferentials  cause  the  duplication  of  organisms,  the  two  partners  may 
still  remain  united  in  a  mechanical  sense;  but  sometimes  a  complete  separa- 
tion occurs.  Conversely,  in  the  normally  segmented  ovum  each  blastomere  may 
develop  into  a  separate  individual  if  the  surfaces  through  which  the  blasto- 
meres are  joined  are  altered,  or  if  the  substances  lying  at  the  surfaces  of  the 
cells  are  made  to  move.  The  same  conditions  in  the  surrounding  medium  which 
prevent  the  spontaneous  separation  of  joined  together  blastomeres  and  the 
subsequent  initiation  of  abnormal  growth  processes,  may  also  bring  about  the 
union  of  two  organisms  into  one.  In  regeneration  in  both  adult  and  in  em- 
bryonal tissues  the  character  of  the  organismal  differentials,  the  nature,  and 
in  particular,  in  certain  cases,  also  the  orientation  of  the  parts  of  cells  or 
tissues  adjoining  each  other,  determine  whether  or  not  movements  of  cells, 
as  well  as  cell  multiplications,  shall  be  initiated,  which  may  lead  to  the  forma- 
tion of  separate  organisms;  in  the  case  of  the  ovum,  movements  of  special 
substances  also  play  a  role  in  this  regard. 

In  general,  transplantation  of  suitable  tissues  onto  remnants  of  embryonal 
tissues  prevents  regeneration  of  the  host  embryonal  tissue,  and  conversely, 
the  latter  may  prevent  such  growth  in  the  transplant;  but  if  various  incom- 
patibilities exist,  these  act  as  stimuli  which  may  cause  an  outgrowth  from  the 
host  or  a  duplication  of  the  transplant.  Such  incompatibility  may  consist  in 
differences  in  organismal  differentials  or  in  the  contact  of  otherwise  unsuit- 
able tissues;  even  the  turning  around  of  a  longitudinal  axis  of  one  of  two, 
ordinarily  suitable,  tissues  may  bring  into  contact  unsuitable  tissues.  But,  an 
embryonal  bud  does  not  tend  to  reduplication  if  the  strangeness  of  the  soil 
onto  which  it  is  transplanted  exceeds  a  certain  limit  of  unfavorableness.  Thus, 
if  limb  buds  are  transplanted  to  the  head  or  medulla  of  larvae  of  salamander, 
conditions  which  favor  duplication  are  lacking. 

We  find,  therefore,  that  very  early  embryonal  buds  of  amphibia  behave  in 
a  similar  manner  to  adult  organisms  of  very  primitive  classes  of  animals  ; 
also,  that  very  young  embryonal  material  and  early  regenerative  stages  in 
adult  primitive  animals  behave  very  much  alike.  In  all  these  cases,  we  have 
to  deal  with  plastic  material,  where  a  certain  degree  of  unsuitability  between 


284  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  part  of  an  organism  and  the  environment  may  lead  to  growth  processes 
tending  to  the  reduplication  of  the  tissues.  In  such  a  finely  equilibrated  sys- 
tem the  normally  present  factors  must  cooperate  to  keep  an  organ,  or  a  part 
of  an  organism,  at  rest.  Furthermore,  a  normal,  non-transplanted  part  of  an 
organism  which  still  tends  to  grow,  may  be  induced  by  the  presence  of  an 
otherwise  indifferent  foreign  body  to  produce  an  additional  extremity,  pro- 
vided the  necessary  material  for  such  an  outgrowth  is  present.  Or  in  very 
primitive  organisms,  such  as  planarians,  disturbance  of  the  equilibrium  by 
mechanical  means  may  lead  to  fargoing  transformations  in  the  individual, 
and  in  coelenterates  changes  in  the  oxygen  content  in  the  surrounding  me- 
dium, or  perhaps  also  diffusion  of  growth  inhibiting  substances  out  of  the 
animal  may  be  followed  by  the  formation  of  multiple  growth  centers.  It  may 
be  assumed  that  the  contact  with  suitable  tissues  maintains  an  equilibrium  in 
which  all  parts  of  the  organism  are  correlated  in  such  a  way  that  abnormal 
growth  processes  are  excluded ;  distance  substances  also  play  a  role  in  main- 
taining this  equilibrium.  If  these  normal  contact  actions  are  interfered  with, 
outgrowths,  which  may  lead  to  reduplication  in  some  cases,  take  place  in  very 
plastic  material,  while  simple  wound  healing  follows  in  higher,  more  differen- 
tiated organisms.  In  all  these  instances  the  alteration  in  the  environmental  con- 
dition represents  the  first  link  which  sets  in  motion  a  chain  of  events  leading 
to  the  abnormal  growth.  It  is  of  great  interest  to  note  the  apparent  similarity 
in  the  initial  factors,  as  well  as  in  the  subsequent  links  of  the  reaction  chains, 
which  play  a  role  in  embryonal  development,  in  budding,  in  the  regenerative 
newformation  of  organisms,  and  in  the  more  simple  wound  healing  as  we 
know  it  in  higher  organisms. 

Whether  an  outgrowth  occurs  from  a  tissue  surface  which  is  not  adequately 
covered  by  other  tissue,  depends  also  on  the  growth  momentum  inherent  in  the 
substratum.  The  greater  this  momentum  is,  the  greater  the  restraining  action 
of  the  transplant  must  be  to  become  effective.  The  growth  momentum  is  high- 
est in  the  more  primitive  organisms.  Here,  too,  transplantation  of  tissues  suc- 
ceeds better  and  differences  in  organismal  differentials  between  host  and 
transplant  play  a  less  important  part  than  in  higher  organisms.  In  the  latter  the 
transplants  have  to  overcome  greater  difficulties  in  holding  their  own,  but  they 
have  not  to  overcome  as  great  a  growth  momentum  in  the  host  as  do  the  trans- 
plants in  the  more  primitive  organisms.  Tissue  transformers  in  the  form  of 
organizers  are  lacking  here,  where  the  substratum  has  lost  its  plasticity. 

As  to  the  character  of  the  contact  mechanisms,  we  have,  as  stated  above, 
presumably  to  deal  with  substances  or  chemical  groups  transmitted  from  one 
surface  to  an  adjoining  one;  conditions  here  seem  to  be  analogous  to  those 
observed  in  the  case  of  the  organizers,  where  effects  exerted  by  chemical 
substances  are  involved.  Grafting  experiments  in  embryonal  and  very  primi- 
tive adult  organisms  confirm  and  extend,  therefore,  our  conceptions  as  to  the 
part  which  contact  mechanisms  play  in  higher  and  fully  developed  organisms. 
There  takes  place  a  gradual  transformation  of  the  embryonal  system  of  regu- 
lation into  the  system  of  regulation  of  the  higher  adult  organism,  which, 
because  of  the  prominence  of  the  organismal  differentials,  becomes  an  autog- 
enous regulating  system.  This  regulating  system  functions  in  higher  organ- 


REGENERATION  AND  TISSUE  EQUILIBRIUM  285 

isms  through  the  tissues,  which  are  the  carriers  of  finely  graded  organismal 
differentials. 

In  the  highest  organisms,  the  adult  mammal,  the  same  factors  which  are 
active  in  the  lower  organisms  play  a  role  in  the  maintenance  of  the  equilibrium 
which  makes  possible  the  existence  of  an  individual.  But  in  contradistinction 
to  the  findings  in  more  primitive  organisms,  this  equilibrium  is  an  autogenous 
one.  The  various  tissues  composing  the  individual  must  have  the  same  in- 
dividuality differential,  otherwise  disturbances  take  place.  In  addition,  also 
mechanical  factors,  like  cuts,  the  presence  of  foreign  bodies,  may  lead  to  dis- 
equilibrations  in  these  organisms,  which  are,  however,  usually  readily  re- 
paired. Only  under  certain  conditions  of  sensitization  may  mechanical  factors 
lead  to  furthergoing  growth  processes,  such  as  the  formation  of  placentomata. 
But  even  without  the  action  of  mechanical  factors  the  autogenous  equilibrium 
may  be  disturbed  if  growth  stimuli  act  on  adjoining  tissues  of  a  different 
kind ;  thus,  changes  connected  with  transplantation  of  pigmented  skin  into 
defects  in  white  skin  in  the  guinea  pig  may  give  to  the  pigmented  skin,  or 
some  of  its  constituents,  a  growth  momentum  which  causes  it  to  invade  the 
adjoining  white  epidermis.  Similarly,  if  in  the  vagina-cervix-uterus  sex  tract 
a  marked  and  long-continued  stimulation  of  the  surface  epithelium  is  pro- 
duced by  the  injection  of  estrogen,  the  growth  momentum  of  the  epithelium 
of  the  cervix,  which  has  the  power  to  produce  squamous  epithelium,  is  in- 
creased more  than  that  of  the  cylindrical  epithelium  of  the  uterus,  and  in 
consequence  of  this  disequilibrium  the  squamous  epithelium  may  invade  and 
replace  the  cylindrical  epithelium  over  long  distances.  The  equilibrium  in 
the  normal  individual  depends,  therefore,  also  upon  the  maintenance  of  the 
mutual  normal  growth  momentum  of  adjoining  tissues.  A  long-continued  dis- 
turbance of  this  equilibrium  by  a  variety  of  factors  may  ultimately  lead  to  the 
initiation  of  localized  cancerous  growth. 

In  general,  we  may  then  conclude  that  a  finely  equilibrated  state  exists  be- 
tween neighboring  tissues,  the  disturbance  of  which  may  lead  to  growth  proc- 
esses which,  in  some  cases,  succeed  in  restoring  the  same,  or,  in  other  cases, 
a  new  stable  equilibrium.  Transplantation  prevents  regeneration  when  it 
supplies  the  missing  regulatory  factors,  which  in  the  higher  organisms  are  of 
an  autogenous  character ;  but  in  principle,  conditions  are  the  same  in  this  re- 
spect in  the  furthest  differentiated  adult  organisms  as  in  the  more  primitive 
and  embryonal  ones.  In  the  latter,  regeneration  can  be  prevented  by  tissues 
which  differ  within  a  certain  range  in  their  organismal  differentials,  and  which 
also  may  differ  in  their  tissue  differentials.  We  can  here  distinguish  ( 1 )  a 
specific  inhibition  exerted  by  tissues  of  the  same  kind,  such  as,  for  instance, 
medulla  restraining  adjoining  medulla,  or  chorda  restraining  chorda,  in  their 
respective  regenerative  tendencies  (isoregulation),  and  (2)  an  inhibition  by 
tissues  of  another  kind,  such  as  gill  tissues  inhibiting  leg  growth,  or  skin  pre- 
venting the  growth  of  a  tail  or  limb  (alloregulation).  It  is  necessary,  besides, 
that  transplant  and  host,  or  adjoining  tissues  in  general,  should  be  in  close 
contact  if  the  specific  interactions  between  neighboring  tissues  are  to  become 
effective;  otherwise  these  interactions  are  interfered  with  and  growth  and 


286  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

movements  may  set  in.  Hence  inadequate  mechanical  factors  may  be  the 
primary  link  which  leads  to  these  reaction  chains. 

The  results  of  these  various  sets  of  experiments  so  far  discussed  harmonize 
with  each  other  and  also  with  the  conception  of  the  role  that  autogenous 
morphogenic  contact  substances  play  in  determining  the  tissue  equilibrium. 
Again,  in  this  instance  the  reactions  which  take  place  if  incompatible  organis- 
mal  differentials  are  joined  together,  are  due  not  merely  to  mechanical  factors, 
although  mechanical  factors  are  involved  too  in  the  maintenance  of  the 
autogenous  tissue  equilibrium,  but  to  the  interplay  of  chemical  contact  fac- 
tors of  a  more  specific  character  which  reside  in  the  tissues.  The  effect  of 
unsuitable  contact  substances  may  be  transmitted  to  neighboring  areas. 

The  higher  developed  the  organism,  the  finer  and  more  differentiated  are 
the  organismal  differentials  which  keep  the  various  parts  of  the  body  in 
equilibrium;  this  applies  to  the  relation  between  neighboring  parts  of  the 
same  type  of  tissue,  as  well  as  to  the  relation  between  neighboring  tissues 
which  differ  in  type.  In  the  more  primitive  organisms  the  individuality  or 
species  differentials  do  not  yet  possess  the  same  fineness  as  in  higher  organ- 
isms ;  at  least  the  more  delicate  reactions,  which  would  allow  their  manifesta- 
tion, are  lacking.  Correspondingly,  in  these  organisms  embryonal  or  regenera- 
tive organ  and  tissue  formation  is  still  possible  and  here,  too,  organismal 
transplantations  can  be  made. 

We  now  have  analyzed  two  sets  of  facts  in  connection  with  the  develop- 
ment of  the  more  primitive  into  the  higher  organisms.  In  the  first  place  we 
have  noted  the  importance  of  organizer  actions,  which  are  very  potent  in 
early  embryonal  stages,  and  their  replacement  with  advancing  embryonal  life 
by  very  complex  systems  of  contact  substances,  functioning  between  adjoin- 
ing parts  of  tissues  and  organs.  Involved  in  this  process,  also,  is  the  action 
of  distance  substances  or  hormones,  and,  moreover,  a  step-by-step  diminution 
in  growth  potentialities  and  growth  momenta,  as  well  as  in  tolerance  to  strange 
organismal  differentials,  as  tissues  and  organisms  progress  from  primitive  to 
more  differentiated  types. 

Furthermore,  through  transplantation  experiments  we  have  arrived  at  the 
recognition  of  the  relatively  rigid  character  of  the  adult  higher  organisms. 
Reactions  of  growth  and  differentiation  are  here  very  much  diminished,  except 
in  cancer  growth,  where  the  growth  momentum  of  tissues  may  be  very  great. 
Not  only  are  the  reactions  against  strange  organismal  differentials  very 
strong,  but  there  exist,  besides,  some  reactions  against  strange  tissue  differen- 
tials. While  in  the  more  primitive  organisms  the  organismal  differentials  play 
a  relatively  less  significant  role  and  the  interactions  of  tissues  and  organs  and 
the  transformations  which  they  undergo  are  very  prominent,  in  the  higher 
organisms,  concurrently  with  the  diminution  in  potentialities  of  growth  and 
differentiation,  and  in  morphogenic  effects  in  tissues  and  organs,  the  reactions 
against  organismal  differentials  become  very  pronounced.  There  are  found 
in  the  higher  organisms  a  marked  fixity  and  strict  regulation  of  tissues  and 
organs,  which  latter  is  maintained  by  the  interaction  of  contact  substances. 
Thus  an  autogenous  tissue  equilibrium,  which  makes  possible  the  existence 
of  integrated  individuals,  is  established. 


P^irf    TTT         ^e  Significance  of  Organismal   Differentials  in 

the  Interaction  Between  Single  Cells 


Chapter  I 

The  Role  of  Organismal  Differentials  in  the 
Union  of  Free-living  Cells 

We  have  so  far  considered  the  significance  of  organismal  differen- 
tials in  the  grafting  of  pieces  of  tissues  or  organs,  or  of  whole 
organs,  to  embryonal  or  adult  organisms,  as  well  as  in  the  union  of 
larger  parts  of  primitive  organisms  and  in  parabiosis.  As  a  further  step  in 
the  analysis  of  individuality,  we  shall  now  study  the  role  which  genetic  rela- 
tionship and  the  organismal  differentials  play  in  the  joining  together  of  parts 
of  cells  or  of  whole  cells,  which  latter  may  function  as  independent,  free- 
living  organisms.  In  these  experiments  we  have  not  to  deal  with  transplan- 
tations in  the  usual  restricted  meaning  of  the  term,  but  with  related  processes. 
The  methods  used  and  the  problems  considered  in  this  part  are  similar  to 
those  studied  in  the  previous  parts.  We  should  naturally  have  to  include  in 
these  chapters  also  experiments  in  which  unsegmented  eggs  or  ova  in  early 
stages  of  segmentation  were  joined  together;  however,  these  have  already 
been  discussed  in  earlier  chapters,  in  which  in  experiments  with  the  eggs  of 
Ascaris  distinct  effects  of  the  organismal  differentials  or  their  percursors 
were  noted,  and  this  was  true  also  in  the  experiments  of  Mangold  on  the 
combinations  of  eggs  in  amphibia.  We  have  also  reported  already  on  investiga- 
tions in  which  early  embryos  or  parts  of  embryos  were  united. 

In  this  chapter  analogous  phenomena  in  certain  protozoa  and  unicellular 
plants  will  be  analyzed. 

1.  The  union  of  free-living  protozoa  or  of  parts  of  protozoa.  As  early  as 
1863,  Max  Schultze  observed  that  pseudopods  from  different  individual 
protozoa  belonging  to  the  same  species  did  not  unite  when  they  were  brought 
into  close  contact  with  each  other;  but  it  was  only  in  1897  that  Jensen  noted 
a  difference  in  the  behavior  towards  each  other  of  protoplasmic  particles  from 
the  same  and  from  other  protozoan  individuals.  In  experiments  especially 
with  the  polythalamous  rhizopod  Orbitholites,  he  observed  that  two  pseudo- 
pods  from  the  same  individual  readily  joined  each  other  at  the  point  of  con- 
tact to  form  one  single  organ,  and  in  particular,  adjoining  small  pseudopods 
could  unite  into  a  single  larger  one  by  the  flowing  together  of  the  protoplasm 
at  the  points  of  contact;  furthermore,  a  pseudopod  of  large  size  could  in- 
corporate a  smaller  one.  In  these  cases  we  have  to  deal  with  autogenous 
reactions.  On  the  other  hand,  if  two  pseudopods  which  belonged  to  two  differ- 

287 


288  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ent  but  homoiogenous  individuals  touched  each  other,  the  pseudopods,  instead 
of  coalescing,  contracted  and  disintegrated  into  small  balls,  which  could  be 
taken  into  the  body  of  the  individual  from  which  they  were  derived.  These 
observations  were  made  primarily  on  pseudopods  which  were  still  connected 
with  the  body  of  the  rhizopod.  But  even  pseudopods  which  had  been  cut  off 
from  the  main  body  behaved  in  principle  in  the  same  manner;  they  readily 
coalesced  only  with  the  pseudopods  derived  from  the  same  individual.  If,  on 
the  other  hand,  a  cut-off  pseudopod  was  first  allowed  to  degenerate  and  then 
to  come  in  contact  with  another  individual  of  the  same  species,  it  could  be 
eaten  by  the  latter.  This  observation  suggests  that  during  the  process  of 
degeneration  the  protoplasm  loses  its  individuality  differential  and  becomes 
converted  into  inert  material  that  may  serve  as  foodstuff. 

If  we  bring  into  contact  with  each  other,  instead  of  autogenous  or  homoiog- 
enous parts,  pieces  belonging  to  different  species  of  polythalamous  rhizopods, 
the  initial  reaction  of  repulsion,  which  characterizes  homoiogenous  contacts, 
is  lacking.  Such  pseudopods  behave  to  each  other  in  the  beginning  as  they 
would  to  foreign  material,  such  as  various  foodstuffs,  with  which  they  first 
agglutinate  and  which  they  then  incorporate  into  their  body.  But  in  the  case 
of  heterogenous  contacts  this  initial  agglutination  reaction  is  followed  soon 
afterwards  by  a  contraction  similar  to  that  observed  when  two  protoplasmic 
particles  of  homoiogenous  origin  come  into  contact,  and  a  secondary  separa- 
tion of  the  two  strange  pseudopods  takes  place.  The  response  to  heterogenous 
protoplasm  represents,  therefore,  a  combination  of  the  reactions  which  take 
place  against  a  foreign  body  and  of  those  that  occur  in  contact  with  homoiog- 
enous protoplasm.  But  in  addition  there  may  be  an  effect  which  suggests  the 
action  of  a  toxic  substance;  for  instance,  in  some  cases  if  a  rhizopod  touches 
the  pseudopod  of  a  foraminifera  belonging  to  a  different  species,  the  rhizopod 
may  be  paralyzed  and  drawn  into  the  body  of  the  latter  organism,  although 
it  may  subsequently  be  able  to  free  itself  again. 

It  is  furthermore  of  great  interest  that,  to  judge  from  the  data  available 
regarding  Orbitholites,  the  reactions  of  nearly  related,  syngenesious  organ- 
isms towards  each  other  may  be  like  those  of  autogenous  parts  of  a  single 
individual.  Thus  different  individuals  may  fuse  and  form  a  colony.  Jensen 
considered  the  early  age  of  the  individuals  which  unite  as  the  principal  factor 
underlying  this  reaction,  but  it  seems  probable  that  the  close  relationship 
between  the  organisms  and  the  great  similarity  of  their  individuality  differen- 
tials are  of  greater  importance  than  the  age.  This  interpretation  is  supported 
by  the  observation  that  also  in  Arcella  syngenesious  pieces  may  behave  in 
a  similar  way  to  autogenous  parts  of  an  organism. 

In  other  organisms,  such  as  Difflugia,  somewhat  related  but  less  sharply 
differentiated  effects  are  noted.  While  here,  again,  two  autogenous  frag- 
ments of  protoplasm  may  coalesce,  homoiogenous  particles  as  a  rule  react 
differently  towards  each  other,  although  occasionally  the  homoiogenous  and 
autogenous  parts  behaved  alike.  In  the  case  of  Arcella  polyposa,  the  more 
recent  experiments  of  Reynolds  confirm  the  earlier  observations,  according 
to  which  autogenous  pseudopods  which  come  in  contact  with  each  other 


UNION  OF  FREE-LIVING  CELLS  289 

readily  coalesce ;  on  the  other  hand,  homoiogenous  pseudopods  which  contact 
each  other  shatter  into  small  particles  or  droplets ;  but  this  does  not  apply  to 
the  main  bodies  of  these  organisms,  which  are  more  resistant.  Shattering 
apparently  represents  a  characteristic  homoio-reaction  and  it  is  lacking  if 
heterogenous  individuals  come  in  contact.  On  the  other  hand,  heterogenous 
protoplasms  do  not  fuse  with  each  other  as  readily  as  autogenous  ones.  The 
heterogenous  reaction  resembles,  in  certain  respects,  that  noted  towards 
foreign  material ;  however,  these  heterogenous  particles,  in  contrast  to  food- 
stuffs, are  not  incorporated  into  the  main  body  of  the  protozoa. 

The  dependence  of  the  reactions  of  individual  protozoa  on  relationship  is 
evident  also  in  the  subsequent  investigations  of  Reynolds.  He  started  with  a 
single  individual  in  Arcella,  which,  in  the  course  of  time,  underwent  fissions, 
and  this  process  was  continued  through  several  generations ;  a  comparison 
was  then  made  between  the  behavior  of  the  individuals  towards  each  other 
in  the  later  and  in  the  earlier  generations  of  such  cultures.  Reynolds  found 
that  although  all  these  individuals  were  originally  derived  from  a  single  cell, 
after  some  time  they  began  to  react  towards  each  other  as  if  they  were  ho- 
moiogenous organisms,  and  shattering  occurred  if  two  such  individuals  be- 
longing to  later  generations  met.  Such  a  change  from  an  autogenous  into  a 
homoiogenous  reaction  took  place  after  about  twenty-two  consecutive  fissions, 
even  in  cells  which  had  been  kept  under  the  same  environmental  conditions,  in 
the  same  culture  fluid.  However,  if  individuals  developing  through  fission 
of  the  same  protozoon  were  separated  from  each  other  at  once  and  kept  in 
different  culture  fluids,  representing  a  somewhat  different  chemical  environ- 
ment, then  the  homoio-reaction  was  attained  sooner. 

But  Reynolds  was  also  able  to  obtain  the  reverse  transformation.  For  this 
purpose  he  proceeded  in  the  following  way :  after  he  had  changed  syngenesious 
individuals  into  homoiogenous  ones,  he  succeeded  by  means  of  daily  ex- 
change of  the  culture  fluid — placing  Arcella  A  into  the  fluid  in  which  Arcella 
B  had  lived — in  transforming  the  homoiogenous  reaction  back  into  a  syn- 
genesious or  an  autogenous  one.  If  such  individuals  were  kept  together  in  the 
same  culture  dish,  the  return  to  the  autogenous  reaction  could  be  obtained  even 
sooner.  It  appears  then,  that  we  have,  under  these  conditions,  not  to  deal  with 
rigid,  mutation-like  changes  in  the  protoplasm,  but  with  changes  of  a  more 
labile  nature,  which  occur  in  response  to  environmental  factors  and  that  these 
changes  are  reversible.  This  holds  good  provided  the  genetic  constitutions  of 
the  individuals  were  closely  related  to  each  other  from  the  beginning,  as  is 
the  case  if  the  organisms  are  derived  through  fission  from  a  single  individual. 

Such  experiments  suggest  that  into  the  culture  fluid  substances  diffuse 
which  are  characteristic  of  the  individual  organism  and  with  which  presum- 
ably their  surface  layers  become  impregnated.  These  substances  would  then 
be  responsible  for  the  type  of  reactions  that  follow  the  meeting  of  two  indi- 
viduals, or  at  least  be  one  of  the  factors  involved.  It  must  further  be  assumed 
that  the  protoplasm  of  these  organisms  is  readily  modifiable  and  that  in  the 
course  of  continued  fissions  a  change  gradually  takes  place,  leading  to  a  cor- 
responding modification  in  the  character  of  the  substances  which  they  give 


290  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

off.  The  experiments  also  suggest  that  it  is  the  chemical  character  of  the 
surrounding  medium  which  is  responsible  for  the  changes  taking  place  in  the 
constitution  of  the  individual.  It  is  known  that  protozoa  can  become  adapted 
to  certain  toxic  substances  and  to  higher  temperatures;  here  likewise,  the 
alterations  of  the  individuals  may  be  reversible.  Do  we  have  to  deal  in  these 
cases  with  functional,  phenotypic  changes  in  these  unicellular  organisms  or 
in  certain  parts  of  them,  or  do  we  have  to  deal  with  changes  in  their  genetic 
constitution? 

The  observations  of  Reynolds  in  Arcella  bear  some  resemblance  to  reactions 
noted  in  certain  of  the  higher  vertebrates,  by  means  of  which  the  latter  are 
able  to  distinguish  not  only  between  species,  but  also  between  individuals  or 
related  groups  of  individuals  within  the  same  species ;  as  an  instance,  we  may 
cite  the  recognition  by  dogs  of  individual  scents.  In  the  latter  phenomenon 
true  individuality  differentials  are  not  involved,  but  the  characteristics  used 
for  differentiation  between  individuals  are  localized  in  certain  organs  and 
tissues. 

However,  one  important  feature  these  reactions  in  protozoa  have  in  com- 
mon with  the  reactions  due  to  individuality  differentials  in  higher  organisms, 
namely  a  graded  differentiation  between  different  organisms  in  accordance 
with  their  relationship ;  this  similarity  may  be  taken  as  an  indication  that  also 
in  certain  protozoa  differences  exist  in  the  constitution  of  individuals  as 
well  as  of  different  species.  We  may  then  provisionally  hold  that  the  reactions 
which  we  have  studied  in  this  chapter  are  due  to  substances  analogous  to  but 
not  identical  with  organismal  differentials,  substances  in  particular  analogous 
to  individuality  differentials.  It  may  furthermore  be  assumed  that  in  protozoa, 
too,  a  differentiation  of  cytoplasmic  constituents  and  also  of  genetic  substances 
has  taken  place  in  the  course  of  evolution,  which  has  made  the  production  of 
such  substances  and  the  manifestation  of  these  mechanisms  possible.  It  seems 
that  a  finely  adjusted  constitution  of  the  surface  layer  of  these  protozoa  has 
made  possible  the  individuality,  race  and  species  reactions,  which  take  place 
when  two  individuals  or  parts  of  individuals  come  in  contact  with  each  other. 
However,  in  addition  to  contact  actions,  the  organisms  seem  to  exert  upon 
each  other  also  some  distance  actions.  Thus,  according  to  Reynolds,  Arcella 
moves  in  the  direction  towards  detached  autogenous  or  syngenesious  pieces  of 
Arcella,  but  it  is  not  attracted  by  fragments  of  individuals  belonging  to  the 
species  Difflugia.  The  distance  reactions  and  the  substances  on  which  they 
depend  are  apparently  not  so  finely  graded  as  the  contact  reactions.  We  may 
perhaps  interpret,  in  this  sense,  the  observation  that  parts  of  an  Arcella,  which 
in  the  course  of  generations  has  lost  an  autogenous  or  syngenesious  contact 
reaction,  the  latter  having  been  changed  into  a  homoiogenous  reaction,  may 
still  retain  an  autogenous  reaction  towards  Arcella  if  it  is  not  in  direct  con- 
tact with  it.  While  the  contact  action  may  depend  upon  sessile  or  only  slightly 
diffusible  substances,  the  distance  reactions  in  all  probability  are  mediated  by 
diffusible  substances. 

But,  not  in  all  unicellular  organisms  have  such  finely  graded  reactions, 
indicating  the  relationship  between  individuals,  been  observed.  Thus  in  As- 


UNION  OF  FREE-LIVING  CELLS  291 

trorhiza,  a  foraminifera,  E.  Schultz  found  that  the  pseudopods  of  two  sepa- 
rate individuals  can  fuse  with  each  other,  but  it  is  not  certain  whether  this 
represented  a  syngenesio-  or  a  homoio-reaction.  Similarly  in  Radiolaria, 
Verworn  (1892)  succeeded  in  exchanging  the  nuclei  between  different,  non- 
related  individuals  of  the  same  species.  Such  organisms  remained  apparently 
normal  and  were  protected  by  the  possession  of  a  nucleus  of  homoiogenous 
character  against  the  injurious  effects  which  otherwise  would  have  followed 
loss  of  the  nucleus. 

The  extensive  studies  of  Jennings,  Sonneborn,  and  others,  make  it  very 
probable  that  genetic  factors  play  a  role  in  the  mating  reactions  in  Para- 
maecium  bursaria  and  aurelia,  and  similar  conditions  have  been  observed  in 
the  green  algae,  Chlamydomonas,  and  other  flagellates,  by  Moevus.  In  Para- 
maecium  bursaria,  Jennings  observed  that  conjugating  pairs  can  be  obtained 
from  mixtures  of  two  appropriate  clones,  but  not  from  either  culture  sepa- 
rately. Within  a  few  seconds  after  mixture  the  individuals  have  agglutinated 
into  small  groups.  If  pairs  of  two  agglutinated  individuals  form,  the  partners 
in  each  pair  are  derived  one  from  each  of  the  two  clones.  These  mating  re- 
actions occur  provided  certain  physiological  conditions,  such  as  temperature, 
light  and  state  of  nourishment  of  the  Paramaecium  are  suitable,  and  the 
agglutination  takes  place  if  two  clones  of, different  reaction  types  are  mixed. 
But  in  certain  clones,  isolated  pairs  may  be  observed  even  between  members 
of  the  same  clone,  if  the  clone  is  left  for  a  long  time  in  a  state  of  declining 
nutrition ;  the  latter  favors  agglutination  and  this  environmental  factor  may 
overcome  conditions  inherent  in  the  constitution  of  the  different  individuals. 
A  segregation  into  two  different  mating  types  may  occur  in  some  cases  at 
the  first  division  after  conjugation;  in  other  cases,  all  clones  descended  from 
the  same  pairs  may  represent  at  first  the  same  reaction  type  and  a  segrega- 
tion may  take  place  only  at  later  fissions.  The  meeting  of  two  mates  is  acci- 
dental, but  an  effective  agglutination  occurs  only  if  the  organisms  belong  to 
different  and  suitable  mating  types.  These  two  individuals  remain  united  for 
24  to  30  hours  and  during  this  time  they  exchange  half  of  their  chromosomes  ; 
however,  there  is  no  distinction  between  males  and  females  in  the  sense  that 
one  family  would  consist  of  males  and  the  other  family  of  females.  After 
separation,  each  parent  multiplies  by  fission.  The  offspring  is  at  first  immature 
and  has  not  yet  acquired  the  ability  to  undergo  an  effective  agglutination  with 
an  appropriate  mate,  but  in  the  course  of  months  they  become  mature.  The 
offspring  of  two  parents  that  mated  are  all  of  the  same  type,  which  is  usually 
one  to  which  one  of  the  parents  belonged ;  but  in  some  instances,  they  may 
belong  to  another  type.  It  seems,  then,  that  it  is  not  solely  the  genetic  constitu- 
tion which  determines  the  mating  type. 

Likewise,  in  experiments  of  Sonneborn,  which  preceded  the  ones  just 
mentioned,  inheritable  differences  in  mating  types  were  observed  in  Para- 
maecium aurelia.  Here,  in  various  stocks,  collected  in  different  localities,  six 
mating  types  could  be  distinguished,  namely,  types  I,  II,  III,  IV,  V  and  VI. 
Mating  occurred  only  between  types  I  and  II,  between  III  and  IV,  and 
between  V  and  VI.  These  three  mating  groups  do  not  mate  with  one  another ; 


292  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  organisms  belonging  to  these  groups  differ  also  in  other  characteristics 
and  represent,  therefore,  three  physiologically  distinct  varieties.  Certain 
races  belonging  to  variety  2  produce  toxic  substances,  which  may  be  the 
same  or  different  in  different  races.  One  of  these  substances  is  strongly 
toxic  for  all  the  races  belonging  to  varieties  1  and  3,  and  only  weakly  toxic 
for  races  belonging  to  their  own  variety,  namely,  2.  This  toxic  substance 
affects,  markedly,  also  certain  other  species  of  Paramaecium.  Similarly,  the 
toxic  substance  produced  by  another  race  of  variety  2  exerts  marked  dele- 
terious effects  on  all  the  races  of  varieties  1  and  3,  but  is  very  injurious  only 
for  certain  races  of  its  own  variety,  whereas  others  are  more  resistant  or 
completely  immune.  This  toxic  substance  also  acts  strongly  on  certain  strange 
species,  but  not  on  others.  In  these  cases  we  have  evidently  to  deal  with  a 
reaction  type,  which  we  have  designated  as  "specific  adaptation,"  the  specific 
adaptation  depending  in  this  instance  presumably  upon  the  specific  chemi- 
cal nature  of  the  toxic  substances  and  of  certain  receptor  substances  in 
the  different  varieties,  which  insures  a  decreased  toxicity  of  a  substance  se- 
creted by  Paramaecium  aurelia  for  nearly  related  organisms.  Sonneborn  made 
it  probable  that  Mendelian  rules  of  inheritance  are  applicable  in  the  trans- 
mission of  the  characteristics  determining  reaction  types  to  successive  gen- 
erations of  the  various  races.  The  determining  factors  were  contained  in  the 
micronucleus,  but  exerted  their  influence  by  way  of  the  macronucleus  and 
cytoplasm.  However,  these  genetic  factors  were  accessible  to  environmental 
conditions,  and,  in  particular,  the  temperature  prevailing  at  the  time  when 
the  macronucleus  is  formed  from  the  micronucleus  could  influence  the 
proportion  of  individuals  belonging  to  certain  types.  After  this  sensitive 
period  has  passed  the  mating  type  is  inherited  by  all  subsequent  macronuclei 
produced  at  later  fissions  without  further  interference  by  the  temperature.  In 
other  organisms  studied  by  Moevus,  light  is  able  to  suppress  the  mating 
reaction  and  in  certain  cases  the  mating  types  seem  to  be  determined  entirely 
by  environmental  factors. 

We  see,  then,  that  in  interactions  of  certain  protozoa,  comparable  to  ferti- 
lization reactions  in  higher  organisms,  factors  play  a  role  which  tend  to 
prevent  fertilization  with  nearly  related  organisms  and  favor  fertilization 
with  selected,  more  distant  groups  of  the  same  species,  and  that  differences  in 
reactions  may  have  to  be  attributed  to  genetic  differences  in  the  constitution  of 
clones ;  there  are,  furthermore,  indications  that  also  in  these  protozoa  changes 
in  the  constitution  of  the  genetic  substance  may  take  place  and  thus  increase 
the  diversification  of  various  stocks.  In  contradistinction  to  these  genetic  dif- 
ferences between  various  stocks  of  Paramaecia  just  discussed,  certain  struc- 
tural abnormalities,  which  may  be  found  in  some  individual  Paramaecia  raised 
in  cultures,  do  not  seem  to  affect  the  mating  reactions,  inasmuch  as  such 
abnormal  individuals  can  be  made  to  fuse  with  normal  ones  under  the  same 
conditions  as  can  other  normal  individuals. 

Is  it  correct  to  attribute  these  reactions  between  different  groups  of  Para- 
maecium to  mechanisms  comparable  to  those  occurring  in  higher  organisms 
under  the  influence  of  organismal  differentials?  There  are  some  apparent 


UNION  OF  FREE-LIVING  CELLS  293 

similarities  between  the  reactions  noted  in  Protozoa  and  in  higher  organisms, 
but  there  exist  also  marked  differences.  The  characteristic  feature  of  organis- 
mal  differentials  that  they  are  the  same  in  the  various  tissues  of  the  same 
organism  and  are  different  in  the  analogous  tissues  of  different  individuals 
does  not  apply  to  unicellular  organisms.  Furthermore,  it  is  very  probable 
that  many  genes  enter  into  the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials 
and  of  the  organismal  differentials.  In  Paramaecia,  on  the  other  hand,  there 
are  strong  indications  that  the  difference  in  agglutination  reactions  depends 
upon  single  or  a  few  selected  genes.  It  seems  then  that  the  reactions  between 
different  mating  groups  of  Paramaecia  are  analogous  to  the  fertilization  re- 
actions in  higher  organisms  and  this  is  also  implied  in  the  term  "mating  re- 
actions" given  to  this  condition,  or  they  may  be  compared  to  the  agglutination 
reactions  between  different  blood  cells  belonging  to  different  blood  groups  in 
higher  organisms. 

Reactions  similar  to  those  studied  in  protozoa  have  also  been  observed  in 
algae  and  myxomycetae.  In  the  phycomycetous  fungus  Achlya,  the  sexual 
reaction  between  male  and  female  mycelia  seems  to  depend  upon  the  action 
of  hormone-like  contact  or  distance  substances.  Such  a  substance  given  off 
by  the  female  vegetative  hyphae  induces  in  the  male  the  formation  of  antherid- 
ial  branches  and  the  oogonial  initials  attract  the  antheridial  branches,  causing 
the  delimitation  of  the  antheridia.  The  antheridial  branches  on  their  part  act 
on  the  female  vegetative  hyphae  and  here  induce  the  formation  of  oogonial 
initials,  and  furthermore,  the  antheridia  cause  the  delimitation  of  the  oogonia 
through  the  formation  of  a  basal  wall.  These  reactions  take  a  normal  course 
if  the  male  and  female  organisms  belong  to  the  same  species,  but  if  male  and 
female  belong  to  different  species  of  Achlya,  the  reaction  sets  in  but  remains 
imperfect.  It  stops  either  at  the  time  of  the  differentiation  of  the  antheridia, 
or  the  female  fails  to  produce  oogonial  initials  in  response  to  the  substances 
produced  by  the  numerous  antheridial  branches.  This  indicates  a  specific 
adaptation  between  these  distance  substances,  which  transmit  the  stimuli  from 
male  to  female,  or  vice  versa,  and  the  mycelial  substratum  on  which  these 
substances  act.  If  the  latter  and  the  substratum  are  derived  from  different, 
though  related,  species,  the  reaction  will  be  incomplete. 

We  may  refer  here,  also,  to  the  very  interesting  recent  investigations  of 
Moevus  concerning  the  motility,  chemotaxis  and  copulation  of  the  gametes 
of  certain  green  algae.  There  exist  a  number  of  races  or  species  of  Chlamy- 
domonas  which  show  inheritable  differences  in  the  mode  of  reactions  of  their 
gametes  and  the  conditions  which  determine  these  hereditary  differences  are 
localized  in  the  chromosomes  of  the  various  races.  As  a  result  of  these  genetic 
differences  race  specific  substances  are  produced,  which  direct  the  motile 
gametes  in  the  dark.  The  extract  from  individuals  of  each  race  or  species 
acts  most  efficiently  on  the  gametes  of  their  own  race  or  species,  and  more 
weakly  on  the  gametes  of  other  races.  These  specific  substances  are  caroti- 
noids ;  the  filtrates  contain  transcrocetin  sugar  esters  which  are  responsible 
for  these  effects.  Also,  the  sugars  which  combine  with  crocetin  seem  to  be 
specific  in  the  different  races. 


294  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

The  copulation-determining  substances  are,  or  at  least  act  like  different 
combinations  of  cis-  and  transcrocetin  methyl  esters  and  the  proportions  of 
these  two  esters  differ  in  the  different  races  of  Chlamydomonas  eugametos 
and  also  in  certain  other  species  of  Chlamydomonas.  These  proportions  are 
hereditarily  fixed  for  the  gametes  of  these  races  and  species ;  copulation  occurs 
between  those  gametes  of  races  and  species  in  which  the  difference  in  the 
proportions  of  these  two  esters  exceeds  a  certain  threshold  value.  This  same 
difference  in  the  proportions  of  the  esters  determines  also  the  degree  of 
chemotactic  action  which  must  precede  copulation  and  which  leads  to  group 
formation  in  the  various  gametes,  processes  of  agglutination  being  presumably 
involved  in  these  relations.  The  interactions  between  certain  cells  are  thus 
determined  by  substances  which  cause  distance  as  well  as  contact  effects  and 
they  are  graded  in  accordance  with  the  genetic  relationship  of  the  different 
races,  and  the  combinations  of  the  effective  substances  are  likewise  thus  graded. 

In  the  alga  Bryopsis,  Prowazek  (1907)  has  apparently  observed,  if  we 
interpret  his  short  description  correctly,  that  when  protoplasmic  particles, 
which  are  surrounded  by  haptogen  membranes,  come  into  close  contact  with 
each  other,  the  membrane  dissolves  and  the  particles  coalesce,  in  case  we  have 
to  deal  with  substances  derived  from  homoiogenous  organisms ;  but  if  the 
particles  belong  to  different  races  or  species,  such  a  solution  of  the  membrane 
and  fusion  of  the  protoplasms  do  not  take  place. 

Similarly,  in  the  formation  of  plasmodia  of  myxomycetae,  individual 
myxomycetae  or  small  plasmodia  first  stick  together  and  then  coalesce  into 
one  large  Plasmodium.  Occasionally  such  a  coalescence  may  take  place  even 
between  a  large  active  plasmodium  and  a  small  resting  round  plasmodium, 
which  had  previously  been  taken  into  the  body  of  the  larger  individual  (Cela- 
kowsky,  1892).  However,  as  Cienkowski  (1863)  had  found  previously,  only 
plasmodia  or  myxamoebae  of  the  same  species  can  coalesce.  If  heterogenous 
individuals  meet,  they  may  flow  around  each  other  but  do  not  unite,  even 
individuals  belonging  to  nearly  related  species  differing  in  this  way  from 
individuals  of  the  same  species.  Whether  only  syngenesious  or  also  actual 
homoiogenous  individuals  coalesce  with  each  other  is  not  stated  by  these 
authors,  but  it  appears  probable  that  all  individuals  belonging  to  the  same 
species  can  thus  unite.  Nevertheless,  there  have  been  observed  instances  in 
which  even  separate  parts  of  the  same  cell  could  not  join  each  other;  this  was 
the  case  when  haptogen  membranes  developed  on  the  surfaces  of  the  particles. 

The  tendency  to  react  adversely  to  contact  with  the  protoplasm  of  other 
individuals  of  the  same  species,  which  has  been  found  in  certain  rhizopods 
and  which  we  have  discussed  already,  must  have  the  consequence  that  such 
organisms,  even  when  not  surrounded  by  a  shell  or  cuticle,  remain  separate. 
But  if  a  syngenesious  reaction  should  become  identical  or  almost  identical 
with  an  autogenous  reaction,  then  the  formation  of  larger  plasmodia  or  colonies 
would  not  be  impossible.  Conversely,  it  may  be  expected  that  in  organisms 
which  tend  to  form  plasmodia  or  colonies,  this  sensitiveness  to  homoiogenous 
protoplasm  is  lacking  and  an  antagonistic  reaction  takes  place  only  if  more 
pronounced  differences  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  two  individu- 


UNION  OF  FREE-LIVING  CELLS  295 

als  exist.  It  would  be  of  interest  to  compare,  from  this  point  of  view,  the 
protoplasmic  reactions  in  different  colony-  and  plasmodia-forming  organisms 
with  the  corresponding  reactions  in  types  of  organisms  which  live  as  isolated 
individuals. 

We  have  seen  that  genetic  relationship  may  determine  not  only  the  char- 
acter of  contact  reactions,  but  may  control  also  the  movements  of  two  organ- 
isms which  are  at  some  distance  from  each  other.  Analogous  reactions  occur 
likewise  in  cells  of  metazoa.  The  cytotropic  reactions  described  by  Roux 
(1895)  may  possibly  be  of  a  similar  nature.  Roux  found  that  cells  of  morulae 
or  blastulae  of  Rana,  when  separated  from  each  other  at  no  greater  distance 
than  the  diameter  of  a  cell,  may  send  out  processes  and  move  towards  each 
other.  However,  in  this  case  reactions  between  homoiogenous  cells  were  found 
to  be  apparently  of  the  same  character  as  autogenous  reactions.  Cell  move- 
ments, which  probably  depend  upon  substances  active  at  a  distance,  seem  to 
play  a  role  also  in  embryonal  development.  For  instance,  in  urodele  larvae 
certain  mesoderm  cells  are  attracted  by  and  move  towards  the  developing  eye 
vesicle ;  in  this  case  the  organismal  differentials  have  not  yet  reached  a  stage 
of  marked  specificity,  and  accordingly  a  lack  of  individual  specificity  is  noted 
in  the  movements  of  these  embryonal  cells  towards  a  transplanted  eye  vesicle. 
As  we  have  seen,  in  higher  organisms  the  organismal  differentials  regulating 
the  interaction  between  cells  and  tissues  are  more  finely  graded.  In  addition 
to  the  examples  discussed  already,  we  may  mention  the  following  observation 
recorded  by  A.  Fischer.  If  parts  of  two  homoiogenous  chick  embryo  hearts  are 
combined  in  vitro,  cellular  anastomoses  between  contractile  elements  of  such 
fragments  are  produced  and  synchronous  pulsations  of  the  two  parts  take 
place ;  but  this  reaction  does  not  occur  if  the  embryonal  heart  fragments, 
placed  in  contact  with  each  other  under  otherwise  the  same  conditions,  belong 
to  two  different  avian  species.  In  a  like  manner,  as  we  have  already  pointed 
out,  there  is  reason  for  attributing  to  autogenous  morphogenic  contact  sub- 
stances the  function  of  maintaining  in  mammals  the  normal  inter-relation  and 
balance  between  the  different  tissues  of  the  same  organism,  the  autogenous 
tissue  equilibrium. 

It  seems  then  that  reactions  occur  in  unicellular  organisms,  which  in  some 
respects  correspond  to  those  which,  in  higher  organisms,  we  attribute  to 
organismal  and  especially  also  to  individuality  differentials.  But  as  we  have 
seen,  the  same  criteria  as  to  organismal  differentials  which  we  applied  in 
higher  organisms  cannot,  in  a  strict  sense,  be  used  in  protozoa  and  unicellular 
plants,  because  by  definition  the  organismal  differentials,  and  in  particular  the 
individuality  differentials,  are  substances  present  in  all,  or  almost  all  of  the 
cells  and  tissues  of  a  given  individual  and  differentiate  this  individual  from 
all  other  individuals.  It  is  clear  that  in  a  unicellular  organism  such  a  defini- 
tion cannot  apply.  Still,  we  may  at  least  conclude  that  certain  protozoa  and 
flagellated  gametes  of  algae  possess  structures  and  substances  which  function 
in  a  somewhat  similar  manner  to  the  organismal  differentials  of  higher  organ- 
isms, inasmuch  as  they  determine  in  a  graded  manner  the  reactions  of  these 
cells  to  other  cells  in  accordance  with  the  genetic  relationships.  Also,  the  male 


296  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  female  mycelia  of  certain  fungi  may  behave  in  an  analogous  manner. 
However,  we  have  also  pointed  out  some  important  differences  between  the 
mechanisms  underlying  apparently  analogous  reactions  in  these  primitive 
organisms  and  in  vertebrates.  It  is  possible  that  not  all  the  reactions  in  these 
primitive  organisms  are  of  the  same  kind,  and  in  some  of  those  which  we 
have  described  the  probability  that  individuality  differentials  are  involved  is 
greater  than  in  others. 

We  may  find  even  in  some  of  these  unicellular,  apparently  primitive  organ- 
isms, much  finer  differentiations  between  individuals  than  those  which  are 
noted  in  relatively  simple  adult  metazoan  invertebrates,  such  as  Hydra  and 
Planaria,  or  in  the  embryos  of  vertebrates.  Although  protozoa  and  the  gametes 
of  algae  belong  to  classes  of  organisms  which  are  considered  primitive,  it 
seems  that  within  these  classes  there  have  developed,  in  the  course  of  evolu- 
tion, very  fine  differentiations  between  single  cells,  which  cannot  as  yet  be 
observed  in  the  organisms  from  which  they  are  presumably  derived.  It  is 
therefore  possible  that  in  these  classes  of  unicellular  organisms  mechanisms 
or  substances  have  evolved,  in  certain  respects  analogous  to  but  probably  not 
identical  with  individuality  differentials.  The  reactions  which  they  manifest 
are  at  least  partly  localized  in  the  ectoplasmic  structures  of  these  cells ;  but 
inasmuch  as  the  latter  may  be  newly  formed  by  the  rest  of  the  protoplasm  in 
a  protozoon  temporarily  deprived  of  them,  we  must  assume  that  also  other 
parts  of  these  cells,  including  perhaps  their  nuclear  substance,  have  the  power 
to  give  origin  to  their  own  specific  individuality  differential-like  substances. 

As  we  have  already  mentioned,  the  observations  discussed  in  this  chapter 
may  be  of  significance  also  in  the  analysis  of  the  conditions  underlying  the 
formation  of  colonies  which,  in  some  instances,  develop  from  unicellular 
organisms.  Individuality  differential-like  mechanisms  in  unicellular  organisms 
tend  to  keep  the  individuals  separate  from  other  individuals  of  the  same  species 
and  thus  to  insure  to  those  organisms  the  maintenance  of  a  separate  existence. 
Conversely,  it  may  be  concluded  that  whenever  colony  formation  occurs, 
reactions  characteristic  of  individuality  differential-like  substances,  such  as 
we  have  here  described,  are  lacking. 

As  to  the  interpretation  of  the  mechanism  underlying  contact  reactions  be- 
tween unicellular  organisms,  possessing  their  own  individuality  or  species 
differential-like  mechanisms,  Jensen  and  Verworn  started  with  the  assump- 
tion that  the  protoplasm  of  these  cells  is  liquid  throughout.  However,  from 
what  has  been  learned  since  about  the  constitution  of  amoeboid  cells  in  pro- 
tozoa, in  amoebocytes  of  Limulus,  and  even  in  cells  of  higher  organisms,  it 
appears  that  the  consistency  of  the  ectoplasmic  layer  of  isolated  cells  is  gen- 
erally more  or  less  solid,  although  readily  undergoing  changes,  and  that  under 
different  conditions  its  consistency  may  vary  between  the  extremes  of  a  com- 
pletely solid  and  a  liquid  state.  In  the  case  of  the  organisms  under  discussion, 
the  contact  between  the  surface  layers  of  two  unicellular  animals  or  plants, 
which  latter  differ  in  what  in  higher  organisms  would  correspond  to  organis- 
mal  differentials,  may,  under  certain  conditions,  act  as  an  abnormal  stimulus 
initiating  a  softening  of  the  surface  layer;  this  change  may  be  followed  by 


UNION  OF  FREE-LIVING  CELLS  297 

agglutination  and  coalescence  of  the  cells,  while  under  other  conditions  a  more 
complete  liquefaction  and  a  subsequent  shattering  reaction  may  occur,  result- 
ing in  the  disintegration  of  the  protoplasm  into  separate  droplets  in  accordance 
with  the  alterations  in  surface  tension  of  the  liquids  concerned  in  these  reac- 
tions. 

In  the  case  of  the  amoebocytes  of  Limulus  it  can  be  shown  that  numerous 
environmental  changes  may  produce  variations  in  the  consistency  of  the  outer 
layer  of  the  protoplasm,  which  in  some  instances  cause  agglutination,  and  in 
others  amoeboid  movement.  It  is  therefore  conceivable  that  in  other  unicellular 
organisms  stimuli,  which  sometimes  lead  to  agglutination  and  coalescence, 
may  under  different  circumstances  initiate  amoeboid  movements  of  cells  in  a 
direction  towards  each  other,  influenced  in  this  process  by  substances  which 
are  hormone-like  and  which  may  not,  themselves,  possess  organismal  differ- 
entials. Also,  the  movements  of  embryonal  cells  in  the  direction  towards  other 
tissues  may  be  explained  as  due  to  surface  reactions  similar  to  those  which 
lead  to  agglutination,  coalescence,  or  migration  in  unicellular  organisms. 


Chapter  2 
Tissue  Formation  and  Organismal  Differentials 

We  have  seen  that  incompatibilities  between  the  organismal  differ- 
entials or  their  precursors,  or  between  substances  analogous  to 
these  differentials,  but  not  identical  with  them,  which  are  present 
in  adjoining  cells  may  prevent  the  union  of  the  latter  and  lead  to  the  separa- 
tion of  cells  or  parts  of  cells  at  or  near  the  point  where  the  bearers  of  the 
incompatible  differentials  come  in  contact.  This  applies  to  the  union  of  ova 
and  of  embryos,  or  parts  of  embryos,  in  very  early  stages  of  development, 
as  well  as  to  the  union  of  free-living,  unicellular  organisms  or  parts  of  them. 
In  other  cases  it  may  merely  modify  the  nature  of  their  union.  There  is  a 
related  phenomenon  of  great  biological  interest,  namely,  the  formation  of 
tissues  through  the  union  of  single  cells.  Here  apparently  similar  factors  to 
those  which  we  have  discussed  in  the  preceding  chapters  are  active  and  it  may 
therefore  perhaps  be  possible  to  analyze  the  conditions  on  which  the  union  of 
various  cells  into  tissues  depends,  and  to  determine  whether  there  is  any 
indication  that  in  this  process,  also,  organismal  differentials  or  related  sub- 
stances play  a  part. 

1.  A  very  simple  and  primitive  type  of  tissue  results  from  the  agglutina- 
tion of  amoebocytes  of  Limulus,  which  takes  place  spontaneously  whenever 
the  blood  of  this  animal  leaves  the  body  under  natural  conditions.  Because  of 
the  primitive  nature  of  this  process,  it  exemplifies,  perhaps,  some  of  the  prin- 
ciples underlying  tissue  formation  in  general,  and  moreover,  it  is  more  readily 
accessible  to  experimental  analysis  than  the  more  complex  processes  leading 
to  the  formation  of  the  fixed  tissues  in  organisms.  In  contrast  to  the  latter, 
the  amoebocyte  tissue  is  merely  an  experimental  tissue,  but  the  analysis  of  the 
factors  underlying  its  formation  has  served  as  the  starting  point  for  similar 
studies  in  the  case  of  the  more  complex  natural  tissues. 

The  essential  factor  underlying  the  formation  of  this  amoebocyte  tissue  is 
an  agglutination  process,  and  the  agglutination  is  due  to  a  change  in  the 
environment  of  these  cells,  which  acts  as  a  stimulus.  The  stronger  the  stimulus 
within  a  certain  range,  the  greater  are  the  changes  in  the  amoebocytes  and  the 
more  intense  is  the  agglutination  which  takes  place.  Thus,  if  we  make  an 
incision  into  a  Limulus  and  allow  the  blood  to  flow  out  through  such  a  narrow 
opening,  it  will  come  in  contact  with  the  rough  surface  of  the  wound  and 
subsequently  with  the  chitinous  body  covering;  under  these  conditions  the 
amoebocytes  send  out  pseudopods  and  some  of  the  cells  may  even  change  into 
a  diffuse  gelatinous  material.  If  the  altered  cells  and  the  material  flowing  out 
from  the  injured  amoebocytes  come  in  contact  with  one  another  they  stick 
together,  so  that  they  form  one  jelly-like  mass,  which  gradually  retracts  into 
a  small  firm  clot,  in  this  respect  behaving  therefore  not  unlike  a  blood  coagu- 
lum.  But  if,  instead  of  using  this  simple  process,  we  collect  the  blood  by  means 

298 


TISSUE  FORMATION  299 

of  a  smooth,  oiled  cannula,  in  glass  dishes  kept  at  a  temperature  near  the 
freezing  point  of  water,  the  changes  which  the  cells  undergo  are  much  less 
pronounced,  and  although  under  these  conditions  the  cells  still  agglutinate 
with  one  another,  the  agglutination  is  less  firm,  the  cells  remain  preserved 
much  better  and  gradually  sink  down  to  the  bottom  of  the  dish,  where  they 
form  a  connected,  relatively  thin  layer  of  tissue. 

However,  whether  we  use  the  first  or  second  method,  in  principle  we  have 
to  deal  with  the  same  change  in  the  constitution  of  the  cells.  Within  the  blood- 
channels  of  the  animal  the  amoebocyte  represents  a  flat  elliptic  transparent 
disc,  which  is  carried  along  by  the  blood-lymph  current  and  is  not  sticky ;  but 
under  the  influence  of  mechanical  and  various  kinds  of  chemical  stimuli  the 
amoebocyte  seems  to  take  up  some  fluid  from  the  surrounding  medium  and 
becomes  a  round  or  oval  cell  with  larger  granules  which  are  separated  by  a 
considerable  amount  of  intergranular  substance.  As  a  result  of  this  change  in 
consistency,  especially  of  the  outer  ectoplasmic  layer  of  the  protoplasm,  the 
cells  become  sticky  and  adhere  to  one  another  as  well  as  to  the  more  or  less 
solid  surface  of  the  dish  with  which  they  come  in  contact,  or  they  sink  down ; 
furthermore,  associated  with  this  change  there  is  a  tendency  of  the  amoebo- 
cytes  to  send  out  pseudopods  and  to  manifest  amoeboid  movement.  These 
observations   suggest  that  agglutination  -  and  amoeboid  movement  may   be 
related  processes.  Conditions  which  tend  to  increase  the  consistency  of  the 
protoplasm  within  a  certain  range,  also  tend  to  decrease  the  stickiness  and 
agglutinability  of  the  cells  and  to  diminish  their  amoeboid  movement.  Under 
the  action  of  these  factors  the  pseudopods  become  fine,  more  or  less  shred- 
like, and  the  amoeboid  movement  is  slowed  down.  Such  effects  are  produced, 
for  instance,  by  the  use  of  hypertonic  salt  solutions,  by  addition  of  a  slight 
amount  of  acid  to  a  sodium  chloride  solution  isotonic  with  sea-water,  by  an 
increase  in  certain  ions,  as  for  instance,  Na  and  S04,  in  the  surrounding 
medium,  and  by  exposing  the  cells  to  cold.  In  a  limited  way,  a  temporary  result 
of  this  kind  is  also  brought  about  by  a  relatively  strongly  alkaline  NaCl  solu- 
tion. On  the  other  hand,  a  softening  of  the  cells  increases  agglutination  and, 
to  a  certain  extent,  amoeboid  movement;  a  moderate  amount  of  alkali  in  an 
isotonic  NaCl  solution,  hypotonic  solutions,  an  increase  in  certain  ions   (K, 
NH4,  N03),  and  a  slight  rise  in  temperature,  exert  the  latter  effects.  The 
blood  serum  of  Limulus  and  extracts  of  Limulus  tissue  act  in  a  similar  way, 
and  they  likewise  have  a  tendency  to  cause  an  extension  and  spreading-out  of 
the  amoebocytes  on  the  surface  of  a  glass  on  which  these  cells  rest.  This 
spreading-out  is  due  to  a  softening  of  the  cells ;  it  represents  a  modified  type 
of  amoeboid  movement,  and  furthermore,  together  with  the  processes  which 
take  place  during  amoeboid  movement,  it  explains  the  tissue-stereotropism 
which  is  common  to  amoebocyte  tissue  and  to  mammalian  epidermal  and  other 
tissues.  In  general,  all  these  different  modes  of  reaction  of  the  amoebocytes 
correspond  to  variations   in  the  consistency  of   the  protoplasm,  and  such 
variations  explain  the  diverse  structural  types  which  the  cells,  singly  or  com- 
bined into  tissues,  may  assume ;  in  addition  they  explain  the  modifications  in 
the  character  of  amoeboid  movement  which  may  be  observed.   Moreover, 


300  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

certain  agencies,  as  for  instance,  acid  dissolved  in  isotonic  NaCl  solution 
within  a  certain  range  of  concentration,  not  only  diminish  agglutination,  but 
may  even  cause  a  separation  of  agglutinated  amoebocytes  from  one  another 
and  thus  change  a  tissue-like  formation  back  into  a  suspension  of  isolated 
cells.  The  agglutination  and  resulting  tissue  formation  represent,  therefore, 
to  a  certain  extent,  reversible  processes.  A  similar  reversibility  we  find  also 
in  some  of  the  tissues  of  the  most  differentiated  vertebrates. 

2.  With  amoebocyte  tissue  we  can  imitate  and  analyze  certain  phenomena 
of  wound  healing  which  takes  place  in  the  normal  epidermis  of  higher  organ- 
isms. Embedded  in  this  tissue  the  amoebocytes  are  at  rest,  but  as  soon  as  an 
incision  is  made  and  a  piece  cut  out,  the  cells  adjoining  the  wound  become 
active  and  migrate  into  the  wound,  thus  tending  to  cover  it.  There  is  a  differ- 
ence in  the  environment  of  different  parts  of  the  cells  adjoining  the  wound, 
these  cells  being  in  contact  with  other  amoebocytes,  on  the  side  away  from  the 
wound  and  with  a  fluid  medium  and  a  glass  surface  on  the  side  of  the  defect ; 
and  this  condition  acts  as  a  stimulus,  causing  amoeboid  movement  in  the 
direction  towards  the  wound  and  away  from  contact  with  the  cells.  Similarly, 
we  can  excise  small  pieces  of  such  a  tissue,  place  them  on  a  cover  glass,  and 
treat  them  as  we  do  pieces  of  higher  tissues  according  to  the  tissue  culture 
method.  Through  secondary  processes  which,  under  certain  conditions,  may 
become  degenerative,  the  character  of  various  higher  tissues,  especially  those 
of  a  mesenchymatous  nature,  may  be  imitated,  and  also  pictures  corresponding 
to  outgrowing  fibroblastic  tissue  may  be  readily  obtained  with  this  experi- 
mental amoebocyte  tissue.  The  same  factors  which  are  responsible  for  the 
movement  into  the  wound  of  cells  and  groups  of  cells  adjoining  a  defect, 
cause  also  the  active  movement  of  cells  in  tissue  culture.  During  this  process 
of  migration  the  moving  cells  meet  fresh  amoebocytes  which  are  likewise 
migrating  through  the  culture  medium;  if  they  come  in  contact  with  one 
another,  they  stick  together  and  form  small  clumps  of  cells,  from  which  the 
individual  amoebocytes  tend  to  detach  themselves  again;  in  this  way  cell 
movement  takes  place,  both  in  tissue  culture  and  in  wound  healing,  in  a 
centrifugal  direction,  similar  to  the  cell  behavior  of  higher  vertebrate  tissues 
under  analogous  conditions.  There  is  no  indication  that  the  movement  is 
otherwise  an  oriented  one;  on  the  contrary,  we  may  consider  it  as  more  or 
less  a  chance  phenomenon. 

As  stated,  it  is  the  physical  and  chemical  changes  in  the  environment  which 
bring  about  the  agglutination  of  cells  and,  therefore,  those  reactions  which 
transform  the  cells  from  free-living,  isolated  cellular  organisms  into  com- 
ponents of  tissues.  If  a  corresponding  condition  existed  within  the  blood 
channels,  as  a  result  for  instance  of  the  introduction  of  a  foreign  body  into 
the  blood,  an  agglutination  would  take  place  here  also,  which  would  lead  to 
the  formation  of  an  agglutination  thrombus  consisting  of  amoebocytes  and 
comparable  to  thrombus  formation  in  higher  organisms,  where  analogous 
cells  or  blood  platelets,  representing  parts  of  cells,  furnish  the  substratum  of 
the  thrombus.  Tissue  formation  and  thrombus  formation  are  thus  essentially 
related  processes. 


TISSUE  FORMATION  301 

While  in  certain  respects  amoebocytes  and  free-living  protozoa  differ  from 
each  other  in  their  behavior  as  far  as  amoeboid  movement  is  concerned,  there 
are  also  some  important  similarities  in  these  cell  types ;  to  mention  only  one 
feature  common  to  both :  the  primary  and  principal  change  in  the  consistency 
of  the  protoplasm  occurs  especially  at  the  point  where  the  pseudopod  forma- 
tion takes  place,  which  is  the  leading  and  most  active  and  sensitive  part  of  the 
cell.  Connected  presumably  in  some  way  with  the  characteristics  of  the  pseu- 
dopods  are  their  fine  reactions  to  individual  and  species  differences,  which 
have  been  observed  in  certain  protozoa  and  which  we  have  already  discussed. 
These  reactions  also  depend  on  changes  in  the  consistency  of  the  protoplasm, 
especially  of  the  surface  of  the  cells,  which  take  place  in  accordance  with  the 
degree  of  compatibility  or  lack  of  compatibility  between  the  cells  which  meet ; 
and  as  we  have  seen,  similar  changes  are  also  the  principal  factors  leading  to 
pseudopod  formation. 

There  are,  however,  also  some  important  differences  between  amoebocytes 
and  protozoa.  In  the  case  of  amoebocytes,  their  behavior,  and  in  particular  the 
degenerative  processes  they  undergo,  vary  greatly  in  different  media  and 
under  different  physical  conditions.  Characteristic  of  these  cells  also  is  their 
need  of  a  protein  medium.  The  free-living  protozoa,  on  the  other  hand,  are 
adapted  to  a  medium  free  of  protein.  Associated  with  this  difference  in  the 
protein  requirement  of  these  organisms  there  is  a  further  difference  in  their 
reaction  towards  certain  ions. 

As  to  the  possible  role  substances  corresponding  to  organismal  differentials 
play  in  the  behavior  of  amoebocytes,  there  are  individual  variations  observed 
in  the  reactions  of  the  cells  and  consequently  also  of  the  amoebocyte  tissue 
derived  from  different  Limuli.  Such  variations  are  as  a  rule,  however,  mani- 
festations of  the  quantitatively  different  tendency  on  the  part  of  amoebocytes 
to  contract  and  of  associated  differences  in  the  consistency  of  these  cells; 
these  result  mainly  from  environmental  conditions  to  which  the  Limuli  have 
been  previously  subjected.  There  seems  to  be  no  difference  in  the  behavior  of 
amoebocytes  to  one  another,  homoiogenous  and  autogenous  amoebocytes 
behaving  in  the  same  way.  Therefore  there  is  no  manifestation  of  an  indi- 
viduality differential  or  a  similar  substance  noticeable  in  these  cells,  as  far 
as  their  mutual  reactions  are  concerned.  They  differ  in  this  respect  from  the 
protozoa,  which  we  have  discussed  in  the  preceding  chapter. 

The  behavior  of  amoebocytes  and  the  agglutination  process  leading  to  a 
joining  together  of  cells  have  been  considered  somewhat  more  in  detail  because, 
as  stated,  the  analysis  of  experimental  amoebocyte  tissue  shows  clearly  the 
principles  underlying  tissue  formation  in  general,  and  the  union  of  cells  in 
tissues  is  the  basis  of  the  formation  of  multicellular  organisms.  But  our  con- 
clusions apply  only  to  the  granular  amoebocytes,  such  as  those  of  Limulus. 
The  so-called  hyaline  amoebocytes  which  have  been  studied  in  recent  years, 
especially  by  Faure-Fremiet,  behave  somewhat  differently  and  do  not  lend 
themselves  to  experiments  with  tissue  formation  in  the  same  way  as  the 
amoebocytes  of  Limulus. 

In  certain  respects  related  to  tissue  formation  is  the  process  which  leads 


302  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  the  development  of  colonies  out  of  isolated  cells.  Such  colonies  are  observed, 
for  instance,  in  the  ciliate  Zoothamnium  alternans ;  but  here,  in  contrast  to 
the  most  primitive  tissues,  a  differentiation  in  function  has  taken  place  between 
different  members  of  the  colonies,  as  Summers  has  shown.  The  apical  cell 
exerts  an  inhibiting  effect  on  neighboring  cells.  When  the  apical  cell  is  cut 
away,  a  formerly  subordinate  cell  becomes  dominant  and  assumes  the  genera- 
tive function  of  the  apical  cell.  But  the  latter  may  also  exert  a  stimulating 
effect  on  the  other  members  of  the  colony.  If  it  becomes  an  exconjugant,  it 
induces  the  first  three  or  four  branches  below  its  own  level  to  divide  pre- 
cociously and  so  actively  that  each  branch  develops  almost  as  an  individual 
colony.  In  such  a  colony  evidently  a  complex  tissue  equilibrium  exists,  but 
whether  this  equilibrium  requires  a  strictly  autogenous  relationship  between 
the  various  members  of  the  colony  is  not  certain. 

3.  The  next  higher  type  of  tissue  formation  is  found  in  sponges.  Some 
complications  are  added  here  to  the  primary  factors  observed  in  amoebocytes. 
H.  V.  Wilson,  who  first  separated  sponge  cells  experimentally,  was  able  to 
observe  that  these  cells  later  united  again  with  one  another,  forming  aggregates 
from  which,  under  favorable  conditions,  complete  sponge  organisms  devel- 
oped. More  recently  Galtsoff  noted  that  it  is  the  archaeocytes  which  play  the 
principal  role  in  the  agglutination  of  sponge  cells,  and  that  they  resemble  very 
much  in  their  behavior  the  amoebocytes  of  Limulus.  As  in  amoebocytes,  so 
also  in  sponges  the  migrating  cells  happen  to  meet  other  cells  of  the  same  kind 
in  the  course  of  their  movements,  and  whenever  such  a  chance  meeting  takes 
place  the  cells  stick  together.  In  both  cases  there  is  the  same  lack  of  an  orient- 
ing force  which  leads  to  the  tissue-like  agglutination  of  cells.  However,  sub- 
sequently some  differences  develop  between  the  behavior  of  amoebocyte  tissue 
and  sponge-cell  aggregations.  In  the  latter,  a  secondary  detachment  and 
migration  of  cells  in  a  centrifugal  direction  does  not  occur  as  it  does  so  often 
in  the  former;  instead,  they  now  spread  out  on  the  surface  on  which  they 
are  resting,  in  a  way  comparable  to  the  extension  which  is  such  a  common 
occurrence  and  which  we  have  analyzed  in  amoebocyte  tissue.  In  both  these 
types  of  cells  the  process  of  extension  can  be  considered  as  a  pathological 
modification  of  amoeboid  movement.  However,  subsequently,  the  aggregates 
of  sponge  cells,  provided  they  are  sufficiently  large  and  contain  cells  of  a 
certain  type,  may  change  into  normal  proliferating  sponges,  while  from 
amoebocyte  tissue  more  complex  formations  may  develop  merely  as  a  result 
of  secondary,  often  degenerative  changes  which  lead  to  the  production  of 
paraplastic  structures.  The  mechanisms,  in  both  instances,  underlying  the 
primary  agglutination  and  the  development  of  stickiness  in  the  hyaline  ecto- 
plasm, which  latter  precedes  the  agglutination  process,  are  related  to  the  factors 
concerned  in  the  production  of  pseudopods  and  in  the  extension  of  the  cells. 
Temperature,  osmotic  pressure  and  hydrogen  ion  concentration  seem  to  affect 
amoebocytes  and  archaeocytes  in  a  similar  manner;  for  instance,  alkali  in- 
creases the  tendency  of  both  kinds  of  cells  to  agglutinate.  But  as  far  as  the 
effect  of  salts,  and  of  ions  composing  them,  on  tissue  formation  is  concerned, 
the  reactions  of  archaeocytes  apparently  correspond  more  closely  to  those 


TISSUE  FORMATION  303 

observed  in  free-living  protozoa  than  to  those  observed  in  the  amoebocytes, 
which  latter  are  adapted  to  a  protein-containing  environment,  while  the  pro- 
tozoa and  sponges  are  adapted  essentially  to  a  medium  which  consists  of  a 
mixture  of  salts.  We  may  therefore  regard  the  experimental  amoebocyte  tissue 
as  representing  the  most  primitive  and  rudimentary  type  of  tissue,  and  the 
sponges  as  the  next  higher  type,  in  which  a  further  differentiation  of  the 
component  cells  and  their  power  to  proliferate  are  added  to  the  primitive  mode 
of  agglutination  and  tissue  formation. 

More  recently  the  agglutinated  sponge  cells  have  been  studied  by  Faure- 
Fremiet  in  tissue  culture  in  a  similar  manner  to  the  amoebocyte  tissue,  and 
he  has  shown  that  the  archaeocytes  behave,  here,  in  about  the  same  way  as 
the  amoebocytes ;  they  move  out  of  the  peripheral  piece  of  tissue  in  a  centrifu- 
gal direction  and  flatten  out.  It  seems,  also,  according  to  this  investigator,  that 
a  further  development  of  such  a  tissue  culture  into  a  typical  sponge  takes 
place  only  if  the  archaeocyte  tissue  has  become  agglutinated  to  the  surface 
on  which  it  has  been  placed.  In  both  cases  the  processes  leading  to  agglutina- 
tion depend  on  changes  in  the  ectoplasmic  layer,  which  make  it  sticky,  prob- 
ably as  a  result  of  the  taking-up  of  a  certain  amount  of  fluid  by  the  stimulated 
cell.  In  addition  to  the  archaeocytes,  the  collencytes  and  the  choanocytes  take 
part  in  the  formation  of  the  complete  sponge,  while  the  other  structures  are 
produced  through  differentiation  of  these  primary  cells.  It  seems  that  the 
excretory  canals  are  the  central  organ  around  which  the  other  structures  are 
built  up. 

If  the  amoeboid  cells  of  two  different  species  of  sponges,  such  as  Micro- 
ciona  and  Ciona,  are  mixed,  two  types  of  reaction  may  be  noted:  (a)  When 
separate  archaeocytes  of  Microciona  and  Ciona  come  into  contact  the  outer 
hyaline  layers  of  the  protoplasm  of  the  cells  belonging  to  the  different  species 
fail  to  coalesce,  the  cells  of  each  species  remaining  separate  and  forming 
aggregates  of  their  own  kind.  Such  a  segregation  is  evidently  caused  by 
differences  in  the  physical  properties  of  the  outer  protoplasmic  layers  of  the 
cells  of  these  two  species,  and  possibly,  as  in  the  case  of  pseudopods  of  certain 
protozoa,  by  specific  changes  which  take  place  in  the  consistency  of  the 
protoplasm  when  cells  possessing  different  species  characteristics  meet.  There 
may  also  be  involved  in  this  effect  of  foreign  cells,  either  sessile  contact 
substances  or  substances  secreted  by  these  cells,  or  substances  liberated  from 
the  cells  when  they  are  injured  in  the  preparation  of  the  suspension.  We  may 
have,  in  this  case,  to  deal  chiefly  with  the  action  of  contact  substances,  which 
lead  to  separation  of  cells  if  they  are  heterogenous ;  in  addition  there  may  be, 
as  stated,  direct  physical  differences  in  the  cell  membranes,  which  prevent 
agglutination  and  normal  tissue  formation.  In  this  connection  it  is  of  interest 
to  note  that,  according  to  Galtsoff  and  Pertzoff,  the  cells  of  Ciona  and  Micro- 
ciona differ  also  in  the  pH  of  their  cell  content,  (b)  But  there  may  take  place 
a  second  type  of  interaction  between  cells  of  different  species.  As  a  result  of 
the  unfavorable  effect  of  substances  extracted  from  a  suspension  of  heterog- 
enous sponge  cells,  the  archaeocytes  are  injured;  rapid  cytolysis  take  place 
and  the  outflowing  cytoplasm  of  the  degenerating  cells  agglutinates  to  form 


304  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

a  floccular  material  which  likewise  gradually  becomes  dissolved.  There  is, 
however,  no  perfect  correspondence  between  the  phylogenetic  relationship 
of  the  two  species  and  the  way  in  which  these  heterogenous  cells  act  on  each 
other;  furthermore,  the  results  obtained  with  reciprocal  combinations  may 
vary.  Whether  the  cytolytic  substances  involved  in  this  process  differ  only  in 
quantity,  or  also  in  kind,  from  the  contact  substances  mentioned  above  is 
uncertain.  It  may  be  added  here  that  in  arthropods  we  have  observed  that 
a  precipitation  takes  place  if  the  sera  belonging  to  different  species  are  mixed 
with  each  other;  this  may  be  a  related  phenomenon  to  the  cytolytic  effect  of 
heterogenous  substances  seen  in  sponges. 

4.  A  still  higher  type  of  tissue  formation  has  been  described  by  Spek  in 
the  tunicate  Clavelina.  Within  this  organism  amoebocytes  are  found  carrying 
special  cell  inclusions  and  wandering  to  places  where,  owing  to  the  presence 
of  a  wound,  regenerative  or  reduction  processes  occur,  such  as  are  associated 
with  bud  formation.  These  amoebocytes  migrate  in  great  numbers  and  either 
go  to  the  area  of  new-growth  or  accumulate  in  the  body  cavity.  Here  they 
agglutinate  to  form  clumps  or  masses,  arranging  themselves  in  a  tissue-like 
manner,  and  according  to  Spek,  subsequently  giving  rise  to  the  formation  of 
the  new  tissues  and  organs.  Under  normal  conditions  when  instead  of  other 
amoebocytes  they  meet  cells  of  a  different  kind,  or  if  they  migrate  through 
other  tissue  layers,  they  do  not  agglutinate  with  one  another  nor  do  they 
agglutinate  with  the  other  kind  of  cells.  But  as  soon  as  their  environment 
becomes  abnormal,  as  for  instance,  near  a  wound,  or  when  during  the  re- 
duction processes  in  the  animal  they  are  exposed  to  conditions  under  which 
abnormal  products  of  disintegration  act  upon  them,  or  when  the  preformed 
tissues  in  these  tunicates  are  unable  to  undertake  the  necessary  regenerative 
functions,  then  these  cells  become  sticky  and  agglutination  occurs.  Preceding 
the  formation  of  clumps  under  such  abnormal  conditions,  the  amoebocytes 
migrate  in  masses  to  areas  which  presumably  have  undergone  pathological 
changes,  either  to  the  aboral  pole  in  dying  animals  or  into  the  body  cavity 
prior  to  the  formation  of  winter  buds.  In  case  of  regeneration  of  special 
organs  they  may  first  form  epithelium-like  surfaces,  a  process  which  likewise 
presupposes  agglutination.  Smaller  groups  may  then  agglutinate  with  one 
another,  so  that  larger  or  sausage-like  masses  result,  but  the  agglutination 
processes  are  always  preceded  by  active  amoeboid  movement,  and  this  is  an 
oriented  one,  directed  apparently  by  substances  produced  in  regions  where 
pathological  processes  take  place.  These  movements  and  agglutination  proc- 
esses are  followed  by  organ  formation. 

Thus  we  note  here  a  close  parallelism  to  the  reaction  of  amoebocytes  of 
Limulus,  where  likewise  abnormal  environmental  factors  cause  changes  in 
the  surface  layer  of  the  cells  leading  to  agglutination  and  formation  of  tissue- 
like layers,  but  in  Clavelina,  as  well  as  in  sponges,  these  primary  processes 
are  followed  by  the  development  of  differentiated  tissues  and  organs.  There 
is  an  additional  point  of  similarity  between  amoebocytes  of  Limulus  and  the 
amoebocytes  of  Clavelina ;  for  both  of  these  types  of  cells  sea-water  or  solu- 
tions of  inorganic  constituents,  as  such,  are  toxic,  and  a  salt  solution  which 


TISSUE  FORMATION  305 

is  balanced,  as  far  as  these  cells  are  concerned,  cannot  be  produced,  since 
they  need  a  protective  colloid  in  the  form  of  protein,  as  has  already  been 
stated  in  the  case  of  Limulus.  However,  subsequent  investigators  (Brian, 
Ries)  attribute  the  tissue  formation  during  the  process  of  budding,  not  to 
these  amoeboid  cells,  but  to  special  cells  which  resemble  more  closely  lympho- 
cytes and  which  have  a  tendency  to  divide  mitotically.  Ries  assumes  that  the 
packages  of  amoeboid  cells  which  are  seen,  serve  merely  as  foodstuffs  during 
the  process  of  tissue  formation ;  but  even  if  this  view  should  be  correct,  still, 
the  amoeboid  cells  of  Clavelina  do  produce  tissue-like  formations  during  or 
preceding  the  process  of  budding  and  migrate  towards  the  regions  where 
active  tissue  formation  occurs,  and  in  this  respect  they  resemble  in  their 
mode  of  reaction  the  amoebocytes  of  Limulus  and  the  archaeocytes  of 
sponges  under  injurious  conditions. 

There  is  some  indication  that  also  in  other  instances  the  blastema  from 
which  regenerative  processes  proceed,  takes  its  origin  from  cells  migrating 
to  a  wound  from  distant  parts  of  the  organism.  Observations  of  this  kind 
have  been  made  by  Balinsky  and  Hellmich,  and  we  have  referred  to  them  in 
a  previous  chapter.  There  is,  however,  some  doubt  at  present  as  to  whether 
we  have  to  deal  in  these  processes  with  the  migration  of  more  or  less  un- 
differentiated mesenchymatous  cells  possessing  great  developmental  poten- 
tialities, or  with  the  migration  of  already  more  or  less  differentiated  cells 
giving  rise  to  the  new  tissue.  If  the  migration  of  undifferentiated  wandering 
cells  should  actually  play  so  great  a  part  in  regenerative  processes  as  is  as- 
sumed by  Hellmich,  it  is  quite  probable  that  here,  also,  agglutination  and 
possibly  coalescence  of  these  cells  precede  tissue  formation. 

5.  Tissue  formation  which  takes  place  during  embryonal  life  begins  with 
the  segmentation  of  fertilized  or  parthenogenetically  developing  ova;  but  in 
this  case,  underlying  the  union  of  the  cells  is  a  more  complicated  mechanism. 
This  depends,  above  all,  on  the  presence  of  membranes  surrounding  the 
ovum  and  the  early  embryo,  and  furthermore,  on  certain  special  structures 
which  connect  the  individual  segments.  However,  the  methods  which  are 
successful  in  accomplishing  the  union  of  different  ova  or  blastomeres,  or  in 
separating  normally  united  blastomeres  from  each  other — both  processes 
being  influenced  by  changes  in  alkalinity,  in  Ca  content,  and  in  the  tempera- 
ture of  the  surrounding  medium — indicate  that  also  in  these  cases  we  may 
primarily  have  to  deal  with  agglutination  processes  due  to  changes  in  the 
consistency  of  the  ectoplasm  of  ova  or  blastomeres.  These  primary  changes 
may  then  be  secondarily  followed  either  by  coalescence  or  by  fargoing  cell 
and  tissue  differentiations.  It  may  be  assumed,  therefore,  that  also  in  the  first 
stages  of  the  formation  of  multicellular  embryos,  agglutination  processes, 
not  unlike  those  which  occur  between  amoebocytes  of  Limulus,  may  play  a 
significant  role. 

With  this  conclusion  harmonize  also  the  experiments  relating  to  the 
agglutination  and  coalescence  of  ova  and  blastomeres  in  various  classes  of 
animals,  to  which  we  have  referred  in  a  preceding  chapter.  The  organismal 
differentials  or  their  precursors  were  found  to  be  an  essential  factor  in  de- 


306  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

termining  whether  such  an  agglutination  will  or  will  not  take  place  and 
whether  the  union  will  be  temporary  or  permanent.  Similar  factors,  and  in 
particular  agglutination  processes,  may  perhaps  be  concerned  also  in  the 
joining  together  of  parts  of  more  primitive  adult  organisms,  such  as  Hyla, 
Planaria,  Lumbricus,  and  even  in  the  transplantation  of  extremity  buds  in 
Triton,  or  of  extremities  in  the  larvae  of  Salamander,  although  the  processes 
underlying  these  latter  phenomena  have  not  yet  been  analyzed  from  this  point 
of  view. 

6.  Even  in  still  higher  organisms,  as,  for  instance,  in  mammals,  when  a 
wound  is  made  in  the  epidermis,  reactions  follow,  not  unlike  those  observed 
in  experimental  amoebocyte  tissue,  and  in  all  probability  the  factors  under- 
lying both  these  phenomena  are  likewise  similar.  However  in  the  more  dif- 
ferentiated tissues  more  complex  structures,  which  connect  neighboring 
cells  or  tissues  to  one  another,  have  developed,  and  these  may  vary  in  the 
different  tissues ;  but  even  in  the  mammalian  skin  these  complex  structures 
disappear  during  wound  healing,  at  least  temporarily,  and  then  the  primitive 
reactions,  which  are  common  to  so  many  organisms  and  which  we  have 
analyzed  in  this  chapter,  have  a  chance  to  set  in.  In  addition,  we  have  reason 
for  assuming  that  in  the  tissues  of  higher  animals  there  are  at  work  finely 
graded  substances  carrying  individuality  differentials  and  regulating  the 
interaction  of  tissues  of  the  same  type,  as  well  as  of  different  types  adjoining 
each  other  within  the  same  organism.  These  autogenous  morphogenic  regu- 
lators have  already  been  discussed. 

It  may  therefore  be  assumed  that  also  tissue  cells  of  higher  organisms  still 
possess  the  fundamental  properties  of  amoebocytes,  at  least  potentially,  and 
that  only  secondarily  other,  more  complicated  structures  and  functions  are 
superimposed  upon  these  primary  characteristics  and  that  especially  in  certain 
artificial  or  pathological  conditions,  such  as  those  leading  to  wound  healing, 
these  primary  modes  of  reaction  come  again  into  play.  But  there  are  found 
even  in  higher  organisms  certain  types  of  cells  which,  within  the  normal 
organisms,  remain  isolated;  among  them  are  the  erythrocytes,  especially  the 
nucleated  ones,  the  various  types  of  leucocytes  and  the  spindle  cells,  which  as 
far  as  their  function  is  concerned,  take  the  place  of  mammalian  blood  plate- 
lets in  other  vertebrates.  These,  as  well  as  the  blood  platelets,  possess  in 
various  degrees  the  characteristics  of  the  amoebocytes.  The  tendency  to 
agglutinate  is  most  markedly  developed  in  the  avian  spindle  cells  of  the 
blood  and  in  the  mammalian  blood  platelets,  but  it  is  to  a  lesser  degree  also 
found  in  the  other  types  of  cells.  In  all  these  elements,  and  particularly  in 
the  spindles  and  blood  platelets,  the  stickiness  of  the  outer  cell  layer  is  lack- 
ing under  normal  conditions  within  the  blood  channels.  It  is  only  under  the 
influence  of  abnormal  stimulation  that  their  protoplasm  undergoes  changes 
which,  in  principle,  are  presumably  similar  to  those  we  have  analyzed  in  the 
case  of  amoebocytes,  and  which  lead  to  agglutination  and  thrombus  forma- 
tion, or  to  tissue  or  cell  reactions  of  a  so-called  inflammatory  kind.  As  to  the 
role  which  organismal  differentials  play  in  these  latter  processes,  no  definite 
knowledge  exists. 


Chapter  J 

The  Role  of  Organismal  Differentials 
in  Fertilization 

In  preceding  chapters  we  have  considered  the  joining  together  of  proto- 
zoa, ova,  blastomeres,  amoebocytes,  and  more  differentiated  tissue  cells, 
in  their  relation  to  organismal  differentials,  and  we  found  that  in  general 
agglutination  processes  play  a  significant  part  under  these  various  conditions. 
A  somewhat  similar  process  takes  place  when  two  cells  unite  in  the  fertiliza- 
tion of  an  ovum  by  a  spermatozoon,  although  the  interaction  between  these 
two  cells  is  of  a  more  complicated  nature. 

It  was  O.  Hertwig  who  first  drew  attention  to  the  similarity  which  exists 
between  the  process  of  fertilization  and  transplantation,  fertilization  being 
considered  as  the  transplantation  of  a  spermatozoon  into  an  ovum.  He  desig- 
nated the  relationship  between  these  cells,  upon  which  their  mutual  com- 
patibility depends  and  which  may  vary  in  different  combinations,  as  sexual 
affinity,  and  distinguished  it  from  the  vegetative  affinity  which  determines 
the  relationship  between  somatic  transplants  and  hosts.  Later,  W.  Schultz, 
who,  within  a  limited  range,  carried  out  investigations  concerning  the  rela- 
tionship between  transplantability  and  genetic  conditions,  tested  experimen- 
tally the  question  as  to  whether  a  parallelism  exists  between  transplantability 
of  parts  of  heterogenous  individuals  and  the  feasibility  of  hybridization  be- 
tween the  same  host  and  donor  species. 

However,  although  in  certain  respects  transplantation  and  fertilization  are 
analogous  processes,  there  are  also  some  essential  differences  which  had  not 
yet  been  clearly  recognized  by  Hertwig.  While  in  both  processes  the  result 
depends  upon  the  relationship  between  two  organisms  or  parts  of  organisms, 
the  kind  of  genetic  relationship  which  is  normal  or  optimal  is  not  the  same  in 
both  cases.  Whereas  the  relationship  between  spermatozoon  and  egg  is  usually 
homoiogenous,  and  this  is  the  one  best  suited  for  a  successful  fertilization, 
such  is  not  the  case  in  transplantation  of  adult  tissues  in  higher  organisms. 
Here  a  homoiogenous  relationship  between  the  organismal  differentials  of 
host  and  graft  leads,  as  a  rule,  to  severe  reactions  and  to  injury  of  the  trans- 
plant. Furthermore,  in  transplantation  of  differentiated  tissues  in  higher 
adult  hosts  we  have  to  deal  with  the  interaction  of  two  fully  developed 
organismal  differentials,  whereas  in  fertilization  we  have  to  deal,  in  the  main, 
with  the  transplantation  of  nuclear  material,  and  especially  of  the  chromo- 
somes of  the  spermatozoon,  into  a  cell  which  likewise  does  not  yet  possess  a 
fully  developed  organismal  differential,  nor  the  mechanism  by  means  of 
which  differentiated  organisms  react  against  strange  organismal  differentials. 
Ovum  and  spermatozoon  each  carry  a  substance  or  substances  which  later  in 
the  course  of  embryonal  development   will  give  origin  to  a   fully   formed 

307 


308  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

organismal  differential,  identical  in  various  organs  and  tissues  of  the  same 
individual  and  species. 

In  many  instances  where,  in  plants  and  animals,  both  male  and  female 
germ  cells  are  produced  in  the  same  organism,  mechanisms  of  a  special  kind 
have  developed,  tending  to  prevent  auto  fertilization,  which  otherwise  would 
have  been  the  simplest  mode  of  fertilization  but  which  might  have  injurious 
consequences.  Even  syngenesio-fertilization  occurring  in  succession  through 
many  generations  leads  in  many  cases  to  a  gradual  deterioration  of  the 
organism. 

On  the  other  hand,  if  heterofertilization  takes  place,  incompatibilities  also 
develop,  as  a  rule,  sooner  or  later,  even  if  spermatozoon  and  egg  belong  to 
relatively  nearly  related  species;  but  these  incompatibilities  may  in  certain 
respects  be  less  marked  than  those  in  heterotransplantation  and  the  spermato- 
zoon may  even,  under  such  conditions,  remain  alive  and  apparently  unharmed 
in  the  strange  ovum,  whereas,  after  transplantation  of  differentiated  tissues 
between  the  corresponding  two  species  in  mammals  the  host  reacts  very 
strongly  against  the  transplant,  which  is  severely  injured  and,  as  a  rule, 
destroyed  within  a  relatively  short  time.  Thus  in  Echinoderms,  by  means  of 
fertilization  between  different  orders  it  is  possible  to  produce  hybrid  plutei, 
which  in  certain  of  their  characteristics  are  intermediate  between  the  two 
parent  orders.  In  some  instances,  a  slight  increase  in  the  constitutional  differ- 
ences between  spermatozoon  and  egg  above  those  characteristic  of  the  average 
homoiogenous  relationship  between  the  organisms  which  carry  the  sex  cells, 
may  even  have  a  stimulating  effect  on  the  developmental  processes  resulting 
from  fertilization  and  may  thus  prove  favorable  at  least  in  the  first  generation. 
But  in  the  case  of  transplantation  the  incompatibilities  between  transplant 
and  host,  and  the  resulting  injury  of  the  transplant,  increase  rapidly  with 
increasing  strangeness  of  the  organismal  differentials. 

However,  notwithstanding  these  differences  between  fertilization  and 
transplantation,  there  is  one  very  essential  similarity;  after  heterogenous 
fertilization  as  well  as  after  heterogenous  transplantation  incompatibilities 
do,  as  a  rule,  develop,  which  to  a  certain  extent  are  the  greater,  the  greater 
the  differences  in  the  constitution  of  the  organismal  differentials  or  of  their 
precursors  in  the  cells  or  tissues  which  are  joined  together.  A  markedly  heterog- 
enous character  of  the  precursor  substances  of  the  organismal  differentials 
in  egg  and  spermatozoon  is  associated  with  an  abnormal  interaction,  causing 
an  interference  with  the  development  of  the  resulting  hybrid;  but  with  less 
incompatible  precursors  of  organismal  differentials  the  development  may 
continue  long  enough  for  a  specific  organismal  differential  to  form  in  the 
hybrid,  which  thus  acquires  its  own  mechanism  of  reaction  against  strange 
organismal  differentials. 

As  to  incompatibilities  developing  between  spermatozoa  and  ova,  which 
are  sufficiently  distant  genetically  from  each  other,  these,  in  general,  may  be 
caused  by  two  factors:  (a)  an  incompatibility  between  the  spermatozoon 
and  the  surface  layer  of  the  strange  ovum;  (b)  incompatibilities  between  the 
nuclei  of  these  two  cells,  and  in  particular  between  their  chromosomes,  or 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  FERTILIZATION  309 

between  the  sperm  nucleus  and  the  cytoplasm  of  the  ovum.  The  second  type 
of  abnormal  interaction  represents,  on  the  whole,  much  the  finer  test  for  the 
mutual  fitness  of  the  interacting  cells.  Thus  the  spermatozoon  may  readily 
enter  the  ovum  when  the  distance  of  the  two  partners  in  the  spectrum  of 
relationship  is  not  too  great,  but  subsequently,  incompatibilities  between  the 
cells,  and  especially  between  their  nuclear  constituents,  may  manifest  them- 
selves, or  the  spermatozoon  may  be  entirely  inactivated  or  eliminated  from 
the  ovum,  so  that  a  parthenogenetic  development  of  the  stimulated  egg  takes 
place. 

But  there  exists  within  certain  limits,  in  addition,  a  proportionality  between 
the  difficulty  which  the  spermatozoon  experiences  in  entering  the  egg  and 
the  distance  in  relationship  between  these  two  cells.  If  the  distance  is  very 
great,  for  example,  when  ovum  and  spermatozoon  belong  to  different  classes, 
it  is  necessary  to  make  the  surface  of  the  egg  more  sticky  by  treating  it  with 
alkali,  according  to  the  method  of  Jacques  Loeb,  or  by  allowing  the  egg  to 
become  stale  in  order  to  effect  the  entrance  of  the  spermatozoon  into  the 
ovum.  In  certain  echinoderms,  making  a  dense  suspension  of  eggs,  without 
first  washing  them  in  sea  water,  seems  to  improve  the  results  in  heterofertili- 
zation  (E.  Browne  Harvey).  It  is,  then,  only  after  this  difficulty  has  been 
successfully  overcome  that  the  more  serious  antagonism  between  the  con- 
stituents of  the  male  and  female  germ  cells  becomes  manifest.  If  the  distance 
in  relationship  between  egg  and  spermatozoon  is  very  great,  the  paternal 
chromatin  is  prevented  from  orderly  interaction  with  the  egg  chromatin; 
instead,  it  is  pushed  aside  into  the  cytoplasm  of  the  ovum.  This  reaction  may 
take  place  almost  at  once,  or  it  may  occur  later,  during  the  process  of  seg- 
mentation. The  subsequent  development  is,  under  these  conditions,  partheno- 
genetic. However,  even  such  a  development  is  not  normal;  it  appears  as 
though  the  mere  presence  of  the  strange  chromatin  in  the  ovum  exerts  an 
injurious  effect  on  the  latter.  Either  the  development  of  the  embryo  may  be 
merely  retarded,  or  certain  abnormalities  in  differentiation  may  occur  and 
the  resulting  organism  may  therefore  be  less  viable  than  a  normal  one.  Fur- 
thermore, such  organisms,  if  they  should  reach  the  larval  stage,  do  not  usually 
undergo  normal  metamorphosis. 

From  conditions  of  marked  incompatibility  between  egg  and  spermatozoon, 
we  find  all  degrees  of  transition,  to  an  almost  complete  harmony  between 
these  cells.  If  in  an  intermediate  stage  there  is  a  mild  degree  of  disharmony, 
only  a  part  of  the  paternal  chromosomes  may  be  eliminated  and  in  the  re- 
sulting embryo  the  maternal  characteristics  may  predominate  over  the  pa- 
ternal. As  Baltzer  and  Tennent  have  shown,  elimination  of  chromosomes 
may  occur  at  different  stages  of  development:  as  early  as  during  the  first 
segmentation  or  later  in  the  blastula  stage.  According  to  Tennent,  not  only 
paternal  but  also  maternal  chromosomes  may  be  eliminated.  On  the  other 
hand,  if  sperm  and  egg  are  so  far  removed  from  each  other  as  to  belong  to 
different  classes,  the  paternal  chromatin  may  in  some  cases  be  cast  out  even 
before  the  first  segmentation.  All  kinds  of  irregularities  or  monstrosities  can 
be  observed  under  these  conditions,  and  in  general  they  are  the  more  severe, 


310  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  less  compatible  the  interacting  germ  cells.  As  an  example  of  a  slight  de- 
gree of  disharmony,  we  may  cite  the  observation  of  Doncaster  and  Gray  in 
crosses  between  different  species  in  echinidae,  who  found,  as  the  only  ab- 
normality, a  vesicle  formation  on  the  part  of  a  few  chromosomes. 

Disharmonies  between  the  chromatin  of  egg  and  spermatozoon  can  also  be 
produced  experimentally.  Thus  as  a  result  of  injury  to  the  chromatin  of 
spermatozoon  or  ovum,  caused  by  the  exposure  of  these  cells  to  radiations  or 
to  certain  dyes  preceding  fertilization,  the  result  of  homoiofertilization  can 
be  made  to  resemble  that  of  heterofertilization.  Incompatibilities  develop 
here  between  the  precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  two  germ 
cells,  or  between  the  carriers  of  these  precursors.  These  incompatibilities  may 
be  so  severe  that  the  injured  nucleus  no  longer  participates  in  the  develop- 
ment and  parthenogenesis  results,  similar  to  that  found  in  hybridization  be- 
tween different  classes.  However,  in  case  the  injury  of  the  chromatin  has 
been  less  pronounced,  the  radiated  nuclear  substance  may  cause  merely  ab- 
normalities in  embryonal  development. 

There  exist  certain  critical  periods  in  embryonal  life  when  difficulties  in 
the  formation  of  some  tissues  and  organs  are  especially  prone  to  arise,  as 
for  instance,  during  the  process  of  gastrulation ;  in  addition,  it  is  conceivable 
that  a  summation  of  injurious  effects  takes  place  gradually  as  development 
proceeds.  Furthermore,  the  incompatibility  may  affect  either  growth  and 
differentiation  or  viability,  or  both  jointly,  and  there  may  be  a  parallelism 
between  the  retardation  in  growth  and  in  the  abnormalities  in  differentiation 
of  the  embryo  as  a  whole,  or  of  its  individual  organs,  resulting  from  heterog- 
enous fertilization. 

The  following  list  of  the  results  of  heterofertilization  in  echinoids,  which 
Tennent  gives,  may  show  the  gradation  of  injurious  effects  in  a  certain  order 
of  animals. 

1.  Elimination  of  no  chromosomes  and  dominance  of  one  species  with 
inactivation  of  incompatible  chromosomes : 

Toxopneustes  9   X  Hipponoe  $   (different  genera) 
Echinus   9   X  Antedon   $    (different  families?) 
Strongylocentrotus    9    X  Antedon   $    (different  families?) 

2.  Elimination  of  part  of  chromosomes  and  dominance  of  one  species  over 
the  other: 

Hipponoe    9    X   Toxopneustes    $    medium   incompatibility    (different 

genera) 

Echinus   9   X  Sphaerechinus   $    (different  families) 

Strongylocentrotus   9   X  Sphaerechinus   $    (different  genera) 

3.  Elimination  of  no  chromosomes  and  intermediate  plutei : 
Sphaerechinus   9   X  Strongylocentrotus   $    (different  genera) 
Sphaerechinus  9  X  Arbacia  $  :  most  compatible  (different  suborders) 

4.  Elimination  of  part  of  chromosomes  and  intermediate  plutei : 
Toxopneustes    9    X  Hipponoe    $    (different  genera) 
Arbacia   9   X  Echinus   $    (different  suborders) 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  FERTILIZATION  311 

5.  There  may  be  elimination  of  part  of  both  maternal  and  paternal  chromo- 
somes and  inhibition  of  development.  Unfavorable. 
Arbacia   9   X  Toxopneustes   $    (different  suborders) 
Toxopneustes   9  X  Arbacia  S  :  fairly  compatible  (different  suborders) 

There  is,  here,  at  least  an  indication  of  a  parallelism,  although  not  a  com- 
plete one,  between  relationship  and  the  results  of  heterofertilization.  The 
best  results  were  obtained  in  the  case  of  hybridization  of  suborders.  In  these 
experiments  we  notice  differences  between  the  reactions  in  reciprocal  hetero- 
fertilizations.  Differences  in  reciprocal  hybridizations  were  noted  also  in 
fertilization  between  different  orders  of  echinoderms  ( Echinocyanus  and 
Parechinus),  when  plutei,  in  some  way  intermediate  between  both  parents, 
could  be  obtained  if  certain  combinations  were  used.  Similar  differences  we 
have  observed  also  in  the  case  of  transplantation;  even  in  this  respect  there 
is  thus  a  correspondence  between  transplantation  and  hybridization. 

Of  special  interest  are  the  hybridizations  between  Drosophila  melanogaster 
and  Drosophila  simulans,  because  in  these  insects  the  genetic  constitution  of 
the  two  parent  species  has  been  analyzed  very  carefully,  primarily  by  genetic 
methods,  and  more  recently  by  a  cytological  study  of  the  chromosomes. 
Sturtevant  found  that  in  both  these  species,  the  second  and  X  chromosomes 
contain  the  same  genes  and  that  the  latter  are  arranged  in  the  same  order,  but 
D.  simulans  has  a  long  inversion  in  the  right  limb  of  chromosome  3,  as  com- 
pared to  melanogaster.  Certain  variations  between  these  two  species  pertain 
to  the  different  distances  between  the  genes  in  the  corresponding  chromosome, 
also  to  the  different  lengths  of  the  Y  chromosomes  and  to  the  relative  amounts 
of  heterochromatin  in  the  X  chromosomes. 

Examination  of  somatic  cells  in  the  hybrids  between  Drosophila  melano- 
gaster and  Drosophila  simulans  suggests  the  possibility  that  differences  in 
certain  genes  prevent,  here,  the  normal  union  of  homoiogenous  chromo- 
somes. Even  such  slight  differences  in  gene  composition  as  exist  between 
these  two  species  and  the  resulting  incomplete  union  of  chromosomes,  lead 
to  sterility  in  the  hybrid.  Other  species  of  Drosophila  cannot  be  hybridized, 
presumably  because  of  the  greater  differences  in  gene  constitution.  If,  how- 
ever, crosses  are  made  between  still  more  nearly  related  organisms,  as  for 
instance  in  the  experiments  of  Lancefield,  who  hybridized  two  races  of 
Drosophila  pseudoobscura,  abnormalities  of  a  lesser  degree  may  arise,  espe- 
cially during  the  process  of  crossing  over,  but  sterility  results  if  in  certain 
chromosomal  loci  the  alleles  are  derived  from  the  two  races. 

In  the  hybridization  between  species  as  nearly  related  as  horse  and  donkey, 
incompatibilities  occur  during  meiosis  in  the  male  sex  cells  of  the  hybrid,  and 
in  the  primary  spermatocytes  of  the  Ft  generation  abnormal  mitoses  appear. 
A  lack  of  coordination  in  the  action  of  chromosomes  derived  from  these  dif- 
ferent species  leads  to  disturbances.  Under  certain  conditions  even  lympho- 
cytes may  be  attracted  by  the  abnormal  substances  which  are  presumably 
present  at  later  stages  of  the  development  of  tissues  in  such  hybrids. 

Differences  in  the  results  of  reciprocal  fertilization  are  very  evident  in  the 


312  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

experiments  of  Montalenti,  who  crossed  Bufo  viridis  and  Bufo  vulgaris.  In 
this  case  the  combination  Bufo  viridis  ?  X  Bufo  vulgaris  $  was  much  more 
unfavorable  than  the  reciprocal  combination,  Bufo  vulgaris  9  X  Bufo 
viridis  $  .  In  the  former  type  of  hybrids  retardation  in  development  and 
abnormal  morphogenesis  may  affect  early  cleavages  and  gastrulations ;  sub- 
sequently, malformations  appear,  especially  in  the  development  of  the  ner- 
vous system  and  of  the  heart.  In  the  reciprocal  crosses,  alterations  in  early 
stages  of  development,  resulting  in  the  death  of  the  embryos,  are  very  rare. 
The  large  majority  of  these  embryos  develop  like  the  controls,  although  at 
first  there  may  be  some  delay  in  development.  The  tadpoles  seem  to  be  about 
normal,  but  later  on,  during  metamorphosis,  there  is  a  considerable  mortality. 

This  difference  in  the  results  of  reciprocal  hybridization,  as  in  those  of 
transplantation,  may  be  attributed  to  the  dissimilar  role  which  host  and  donor 
play  in  these  processes ;  in  hybridization  it  is  the  ovum  which  acts  as  host  to 
the  spermatozoon  which  it  receives  into  its  body.  The  dissimilarities  in  the 
significance  of  egg  and  spermatozoon  may  be  taken  to  indicate  that  it  is  not 
only  the  chromosomes  of  these  two  cells  which  interact  with  each  other,  but 
that  the  chromosomes  of  the  male  germ  cells  interact  also  with  the  cytoplasm 
of  the  egg. 

In  accordance  with  the  more  complex  and  delicate  chemical  differentiation 
of  cells  and  tissues,  which  progressively  takes  place  during  the  development 
of  the  embryo,  the  interaction  of  the  chromosomes  derived  from  the  two 
parents  evidently  becomes,  correspondingly,  a  process  of  increasing  delicacy, 
and  finer  differences  in  the  relationship  between  sperm  and  ovum  may  there- 
fore, as  a  general  rule,  manifest  themselves  only  during  the  later  develop- 
mental periods,  while  coarser  differences  may  result  in  abnormalities  at 
much  earlier  embryonal  stages. 

It  appears  that  in  some  of  these  incompatibilities  processes  of  a  purely 
mechanical  character  may  be  involved,  as,  for  instance,  maladjustment  in  the 
size  and  shape  of  male  and  female  chromosomes,  or  in  the  movements  of  the 
asters  and  chromosomes,  and,  somewhat  later,  disturbances  in  the  rhythms 
of  mitotic  divisions  and  in  the  developmental  rhythms  characteristic  of  the 
paternal  and  maternal  species  in  general  may  interfere.  However,  there  is 
reason  for  believing  that  in  hybridization  interactions  of  a  chemical  nature 
between  substances  derived  from  the  male  and  female  germ  cells  may  also  be  of 
importance;  and  in  this  respect,  again,  the  mechanisms  active  in  transplanta- 
tion and  in  fertilization  would  then  resemble  each  other.  These  chemical 
interactions  may  be  of  a  toxic  nature,  if  the  two  individuals  from  which  the 
germ  cells  are  derived  do  not  belong  to  the  same  species ;  toxic  effects  of  this 
kind  have  been  suggested  by  Jacques  Loeb  and  Moenkhaus.  But  it  seems  that 
in  some  cases,  in  which  the  distance  in  relationship  between  the  male  and 
female  cells  is  very  slight,  the  offspring  may  not  only  not  be  defective,  but 
embryonal  development  may,  on  the  contrary,  be  accelerated ;  observations 
of  this  kind  we  shall  discuss  in  the  next  chapter.  Also  in  the  hybrids,  Bufo 
vulgaris  9  X  Bufo  viridis  $  ,  to  which  we  have  referred  above,  it  was  found 
by  Montalenti  that  there  were  some  tadpoles,  a  few  weeks  old,  which  ac- 


DIFFERENTIALS  IN  FERTILIZATION  313 

quired  a  larger  size,  underwent  metamorphosis  earlier  and  exhibited  lower 
mortality  than  the  controls.  In  such  instances  of  heterofertilization  conditions 
apparently  exist  comparable  to  those  characteristic  of  homoiogenous  fertili- 
zation ;  but,  in  addition,  certain  differences  between  the  germ  cells  may  exert 
a  stimulating  effect  which  is  favorable  instead  of  being  injurious. 

While,  then,  within  certain  limits  there  is  presumably  a  proportionality 
between  the  incompatibilities  which  develop  in  hybridization  and  the  distance 
in  relationship  between  egg  and  spermatozoon,  exceptions  to  this  rule  do 
occur  and  may  be  very  striking.  They  are  most  likely  due  to  the  presence  of 
secondary  factors  superimposed  upon  the  primary  ones,  which  latter  would 
act  in  accordance  with  the  greater  nearness  or  distance  of  relationship  be- 
tween spermatozoon  and  egg.  Thus  the  degree  of  resistance  to  injurious  con- 
ditions on  the  part  of  these  cells  belonging  to  two  different  species  may  vary 
in  different  cases,  irrespective  of  phylogenetic  factors. 

There  is  another  fact  indicating  the  lack  of  complete  correlation  which 
may  be  present,  in  certain  respects,  between  readily  effected  hybridizations  in 
different  species  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  between  egg  and  spermato- 
zoon. It  seems  that  in  certain  cases  heterogenous  fertilization  may  succeed 
as  well  in  teleosts  as  in  echinoderms,  although  the  latter  stand  much  lower 
in  the  phylogenetic  scale  than  the  former.  Conditions  are  different  in  trans- 
plantations ;  here  we  find,  as  a  general  rule,  that  transplantability  becomes 
more  and  more  restricted  with  increasing  phylogenetic  development.  In 
plants,  on  the  other  hand,  transplantations  seem  to  succeed  over  a  wider 
range  of  phylogenetic  relationships  than  hybridizations. 

It  may  then  be  concluded  that  while  there  exist  distinct  similarities  be- 
tween transplantation  and  fertilization,  there  are  also  notable  differences.  To 
recapitulate  some  essential  facts :  In  both  these  processes  we  have  to  deal  with 
what  may  be  considered  a  host-donor  relation,  the  ovum  representing  the 
host  and  the  spermatozoon  the  donor  cell  in  the  case  of  fertilization.  In  both 
processes  the  host  has  a  function  which  differs  from  that  of  the  donor  and  in 
both  the  reactions  of  the  host  preponderate ;  however,  on  the  whole  the  con- 
stitution and  function  of  the  spermatozoon  are  of  a  relatively  greater  sig- 
nificance for  the  fate  of  the  host,  in  the  case  of  fertilization,  than  is  the  piece 
of  grafted  tissue  or  organ  for  the  recipient  organism  in  the  case  of  trans- 
plantation. While  in  transplantation  in  adult  mammals  it  is  the  character  of 
the  organismal  differentials  in  host  and  donor  which  is  the  most  important 
factor  determining  the  fate  of  the  transplant,  in  the  interaction  between 
ovum  and  spermatozoon  we  have  to  deal  with  the  precursors  of  organismal 
differentials ;  while  in  transplantation  it  is  the  autogenous  relationship  between 
the  organismal  differentials  which  is  most  favorable  for  a  satisfactory  inter- 
action between  transplant  and  host,  in  fertilization  it  is  the  homoiogenous 
relationship  which  may  be  considered  normal  and,  as  a  rule,  conducive  to  the 
best  results.  But,  if  we  compare  fertilization  with  transplantation  between 
embryonal  organisms,  the  difference  between  these  two  processes  is  less 
pronounced,  inasmuch  as  also  in  embryonal  grafting  we  have  to  deal  with 
precursors  of  organismal  differentials  and  not  with  fully  developed  organ- 


314  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ismal  differentials.  However,  in  these  embryonal  transplantations  it  is  again 
the  autogenous  relationship  between  host  and  graft  which,  on  the  whole, 
results  most  readily  in  a  harmonious  combination,  although  in  many  cases 
no  distinct  difference  between  an  autogenous  and  a  homoiogenous  relation- 
ship can  be  noticed.  In  certain  respects  the  analogy  between  fertilization  and 
transplantation  between  single  cells,  or  parts  of  single  cells,  such  as  the  graft- 
ing of  pseudopods  in  protozoa,  would  seem  to  be  greater  than  that  between 
fertilization  and  transplantation  of  tissues  in  higher  organisms,  but  again, 
comparisons  show  a  very  striking  difference,  insofar  as  here,  also,  only  an 
autogenous  relationship  between  cells  or  parts  of  cells  leads  to  a  satisfactory 
union,  while,  as  stated,  the  homoiogenous  relationship  is,  as  a  rule,  the 
normal  one  in  fertilization. 

In  addition  to  other  similarities  between  transplantation  and  fertilization 
there  is  the  observation  that  a  reciprocal  relationship  between  the  individuals 
or  species  serving  as  host  and  transplant,  and  between  male  and  female 
gametes,  may  lead  to  very  different  results ;  the  latter  are  due  to  the  differ- 
ences which  exist  in  these  processes  between  the  function  of  the  host  and  the 
ovum,  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  donor  tissue  and  spermatozoon,  on  the  other 
hand.  In  both  these  processes  the  phylogenetic  relationship  between  the 
interacting  cells  or  tissues  is  a  factor  which  helps  to  determine  the  outcome, 
but  the  parallelism  between  such  a  relationship  and  the  results  is,  on  the 
whole,  much  less  evident  in  fertilization  than  in  transplantation. 

Moreover,  the  reactions  between  the  sex  cells  depend  on  very  special 
mechanisms  which  regulate  the  interaction  between  spermatozoon  and  egg, 
and  which  are  lacking  in  other  primitive  cells.  Such  mechanisms  consist  in 
the  specific  functioning  of  the  chromosomes  of  male  and  female  sex  cells,  in 
the  relation  of  chromosomes  to  each  other  and  to  the  cytoplasm  of  the  ovum 
and  in  the  interaction  of  certain  genes.  As  a  rule,  these  interactions  are 
optimal  in  case  of  homoiofertilization  and  there  may  even  exist  in  certain 
instances  means  for  preventing  autofertilization.  However,  as  in  transplan- 
tation, so  also  in  fertilization,  heterogenous  relationships  between  the  chromo- 
somes of  two  parent  strains  lead  to  incompatibilities,  which  are  greater  if 
distant  species,  than  if  nearly  related  species,  or  different  races  of  the  same 
species,  are  combined. 


Chapter  £ 

Self  Fertilization  and  Autogenous 
Transplantation 

In  the  preceding  chapter  we  have  compared  the  effects  of  heterogenous 
and  homoiogenous  fertilization  and  transplantation.  We  shall  now  con- 
sider the  significance  of  self-fertilization,  which,  if  continued  through 
successive  generations,  may  lead  in  the  end  to  a  very  great  similarity  or  to  iden- 
tity in  the  genetic  composition  of  spermatozoa  and  ova ;  we  shall  also  con- 
sider the  influence  of  close  inbreeding,  a  process  which  may  have  a  similar 
effect  as  far  as  the  genetic  composition  of  egg  and  spermatozoa  are  con- 
cerned. In  order  to  indicate  the  analogy  between  these  two  processes  and  the 
corresponding  types  of  transplantation,  self  fertilization  may  be  designated 
as  autogenous  fertilization,  because  in  this  case  the  two  germ  cells  have  de- 
veloped in  the  same  individual,  and  fertilization  between  nearly  related  indi- 
viduals may  be  designated  as  syngenesiofertilization.  Close  inbreeding  im- 
plies serial  syngenesious  fertilization,  and  through  such  brother-and-sister 
matings  a  relationship  may  be  attained  between  members  of  the  inbred  group, 
which,  while  still  in  the  syngenesious  region  of  the  spectrum  of  relationships, 
may  at  last  approach  an  autogenous  condition. 

As  we  have  seen,  genetic  factors  largely  determine  the  character  of  the 
precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials  in  the  embryo,  as  well  as  of  the 
fully  developed  organismal  differentials,  which  latter  control  the  interaction 
between  adult  tissues;  genetic  factors  play  a  part  also  in  the  interaction  be- 
tween egg  and  spermatozoon.  In  addition  to  these  two  kinds  of  interaction 
there  exists  a  third  type,  which,  while  not  identical  with  these,  possesses 
some  of  the  characteristics  of  both.  This  third  type  is  represented  in  the 
fertilization  process  in  some  higher  plants.  Here  we  have  to  deal  neither 
with  the  direct  interaction  of  spermatozoon  and  egg,  nor  with  that  of  two 
different  tissues,  but  with  the  interaction  of  a  structure  associated  with  or 
containing  the  male  germ  cell,  the  pollen,  with  a  specialized  tissue  which 
surrounds  the  egg,  and  ultimately,  with  the  egg  itself.  During  this  process, 
mechanisms  may  be  active  which  prevent  self-fertilization,  when  both  ovum 
and  spermatozoon  originate  in  the  same  individual.  In  plants,  incompatibility 
between  pollen-tube  and  tissues  which  surround  the  female  sex  cell  may  like- 
wise prevent  a  successful  fertilization  if  ovum  and  pollen  belong  to  differ- 
ent species  or  to  different  varieties.  However,  in  the  case  of  heterofertiliza- 
tion  the  pollen-tube  may,  in  some  instances  actually  reach  the  eggule,  but  even 
then  a  successful  fertilization  may  be  prevented,  owing  to  incompatibilities 
between  nuclear  or  cytoplasmic  constituents  of  the  germ  cells.  We  must  then 
consider  the  spectrum  of  compatibilities  and  incompatibilities  under  the  fol- 
lowing three  conditions,  (1)  in  the  interaction  of  tissues  after  transplantation, 

315 


316  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

(2)  in  the  interaction  of  germ  cells  with  each  other,  and  (3)  in  the  interactions 
of  germ  cells  and  of  structures  associated  with  the  germ  cells. 

I.  In  higher  plants,  Jost  (1907)  assumed  that  the  retardation  in  the  growth 
of  the  pollen-tube  into  the  style,  which  is  observed  in  certain  cases  of  self- 
fertilization,  was  controlled  by  substances  given  off  by  the  tissues  along  which 
the  pollen-tube  grew  on  its  way  towards  the  ovary,  and  which  he  assumed  to 
be  specific  for  each  individual.  But,  according  to  Jost,  it  was  not  necessarily 
differences  in  the  chemical  constitution  of  these  substances,  but  differences 
in  the  concentration  of  the  latter,  which  distinguished  the  different  individuals 
and  might  suffice  to  explain  their  specific  effects. 

Subsequently,  Correns  (1912)  interpreted  the  observed  facts  in  accordance 
with  the  concepts  of  Mendelian  heredity,  and  in  particular,  with  the  concepts 
of  the  pure  lines  of  Johannsen.  He  investigated  self-sterility  in  Cardamine 
pratensis  and  concluded  that  the  inhibiting  substances,  which  in  this  case 
do  not  permit  the  pollen-tube  to  penetrate  into  the  style  and  which  thus  pre- 
vent auto  fertilization,  are  not  characteristic  of  the  individuals  as  such.  Ac- 
cording to  this  investigator,  it  would  not  be  correct  to  assume  that  a  certain 
substance  is  unique  and  occurs  only  in  one  particular  individual  and  that 
it  is  lost  when  this  individual  dies,  but  he  believes  that  there  are  substances 
characteristic  of  certain  pure  lines,  which  are  dependent  upon  the  inherited 
genetic  constitution  of  these  lines.  However,  the  individuals  in  Cardamine 
do  not  represent  members  of  pure  lines,  because  each  individual  is  the  result 
of  preceding  fertilizations  in  which  members  of  different  lines  entered.  A 
special  combination  of  substances  rather  than  one  particular  substance  is 
therefore  characteristic  of  each  individual.  But  according  to  the  law  of  chance, 
it  is  possible  even  for  different  nonrelated  individuals  to  possess  the  same 
combination  of  substances.  These  conclusions  of  Correns  are  based  on  the 
analysis  of  the  behavior  of  individuals  belonging  to  the  Fx  generation,  which 
develops  after  fertilization  between  two  homoiogenous  individuals  of 
Cardamine  pratensis.  He  carried  out  back-cross  fertilizations  between  the 
F1  hybrids  and  each  of  the  two  parents  and  thus  he  could  establish  the  ex- 
istence of  four  classes  of  individuals  according  to  the  character  of  the  sub- 
stances retarding  the  growth  of  the  pollen-tube,  which  each  one  of  these 
individuals  possessed.  When  the  father  had  the  factors  Bb  and  the  mother 
the  factors  Gg,  these  multiple  allelomorphs  were  transmitted  to  the  offspring 
according  to  the  rules  of  Mendelian  inheritance.  Whenever  either  B  or  G, 
or  both  together,  are  present  in  the  pollen  and  in  the  female  tissues,  the  pollen- 
tube  is  inhibited  in  its  downgrowth.  Accordingly,  there  is  only  one  of  the  four 
classes  of  F1  hybrids  which  is  fertile  with  both  parents,  and  it  has  the  factors 
Bg- 

The  genetic  constitution  which  causes  self-sterility  has  been  subsequently 
analyzed  by  East  in  Nicotiana.  East  assumes  that  within  the  same  organism, 
in  the  male  as  well  as  in  the  female  apparatus,  which  latter  corresponds 
genetically  to  the  sporophyte  and  represents  therefore  diploid  somatic  tissue, 
two  characteristic  substances,  Sa  and  S2,  exist.  In  the  female  the  stigma  and 
style  retain  both  these  substances,  because  their  segregation  is  effected  only 


SELF  FERTILIZATION  317 

at  the  time  of  the  reduction  division ;  but  in  the  male  the  pollen-tube  corresponds 
not  to  a  diploid  somatic  tissue,  but  to  a  gamete  in  which  there  has  occurred  a 
reduction  division,  causing  a  segregation,  and  some  pollen-tubes  possess, 
therefore,  S1?  while  others  possess  S2.  In  other  plants  S3  and  S4,  or  Sx  and 
S3,  may  substitute  for  Sx  and  S2.  Now,  fertilization  is  possible  if  the  substance 
which  characterizes  the  pollen-tube  is  not  present  in  the  female  style,  other- 
wise an  inhibition  in  the  downgrowth  of  the  pollen-tube  takes  place  and 
fertilization  is  prevented ;  in  other  words,  fertilization  cannot  follow  if  the 
stimulating  effect  on  the  pollen-tube,  which  is  due  to  a  difference  in  the  sub- 
stances characterizing  pollen-tube  and  style,  is  lacking. 

The  fertilization  experiments  which  East  carried  out  yielded  results  which 
were  in  agreement  with  his  assumption.  There  are  involved  in  this  case, 
conditions  in  which  the  response  of  certain  tissues  to  each  other  depends  upon 
the  presence  of  the  same,  or  of  two  different  substances,  in  the  interacting 
cells  and  tissues ;  when  these  substances  are  identical  the  outcome  of  the  re- 
action is  unfavorable. 

If  a  very  large  number  of  various  kinds  of  homoiogenous  fertilization  ex- 
periments are  carried  out,  many  different  factors  can  be  made  to  interact  with 
each  other  and  a  variety  of  combinations  occurs.  It  is  thus  found  that  if  two 
individuals  which  differ  in  a  factor  are  crossed,  the  F1  hybrids  are  fertile  with 
each  of  the  parents.  As  far  as  the  behavior  of  the  Fx  hybrids  towards  one 
another  is  concerned,  they  can  be  placed  in  four  groups,  the  members  of  each 
group  being  sterile  with  the  other  individuals  of  the  same  group,  and  fertile 
with  all  members  of  the  other  groups. 

However,  in  some  species  of  Nicotiana  self-fertilization  leads  to  fertile 
progeny;  this  is  so  in  Nicotiana  Langsdorfh.  Here,  possession  of  the  same 
factors  by  style  and  pollen-tube  does  not  interfere  with  the  rapidity  of  down- 
growth,  while  in  Nicotiana  alata  it  leads  to  sterility. 

As  to  the  mechanisms  underlying  self -sterility,  in  Medicago  sativa,  after 
self-pollination,  not  only  does  the  pollen-tube  grow  into  the  ovary  more  slowly, 
but  also  the  number  of  eggs  which  are  fertilized  is  smaller;  in  a  number  of 
instances  the  pollen-tube  does  not  enter  the  micropyle  of  the  ovulum,  and  if 
fertilization  should  take  place,  abortion  occurs  rather  frequently.  More  recent 
investigations  indicate  that  in  certain  instances,  as  presumably  also  in  some 
other  plants,  self-sterility  is  genetically  determined  and  depends  upon  the 
presence  in  pollen  and  ovule  of  two  recessive  genes,  which  must  be  present 
in  double  dose  in  order  to  insure  self-sterility.  These  genetic  factors  determine 
the  mechanism  which  causes  a  very  slow  rate  of  downgrowth  of  the  pollen- 
tube  into  the  style;  in  the  latter,  it  may  also  induce  the  formation  of  a  separat- 
ing wall,  preventing  the  further  movement  of  the  pollen-tube  towards  the 
ovule.  According  to  Yasuda,  an  ovarian  secretion  diffuses  into  the  style  and 
has  this  inhibiting  effect  on  the  pollen-tube ;  in  addition,  this  substance  may 
inhibit  the  germination  of  the  pollen.  The  ovarian  product  may  also  exert 
an  inhibition  on  otherwise  non-self -sterile  pollen.  According  to  Eysh,  spray- 
ing of  the  flowers  of  self-sterile  plants  with  alpha  naphthalene  acetamide  di- 
rectly before  or  after  self-pollination  neutralizes  this  ovarian  secretion  and 


318  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

thus  makes  self-fertilization  possible.  There  are  also  other  methods  which 
have  such  an  effect ;  the  most  interesting  one  of  these  is,  perhaps,  the  induction 
of  polyploidy  by  means  of  colchicine  treatment  of  some  branches  in  Petunia 
axillaris  (Stout  and  Chandler).  Self-compatibility  was  procured  for  all  seed- 
lings obtained  from  the  self- fertilized  flowers  of  tetraploid  branches.  More- 
over, these  seedlings  could  be  cross-fertilized ;  likewise,  backcrosses  to  parents 
were  fertile,  except  the  combination  of  a  tetraploid  female  seedling  and  a 
diploid  male  parent.  The  genetic  balance  is  presumably  changed  in  these 
tetraploid  plants  in  such  a  way  that  the  mechanism  controlling  the  movement 
of  the  pollen-tube  towards  the  ovule  is  no  longer  inhibited.  How  many  genes 
are  involved  in  this  process  in  polyploid  organs  is  not  known. 

If  we  compare  conditions  in  transplantation  of  mammalian  tissues  with 
those  in  pollination  experiments,  we  find  certain  analogies.  The  results  in 
both  processes  depend  upon  whether  certain  substances  are  the  same  or  are 
different  in  the  two  interacting  cells  or  cell  complexes.  This  determines  the 
relations  between  host  and  transplant,  as  well  as  those  between  spermatozoon 
and  female  sex  apparatus.  In  both  cases  the  reactions  are  more  intense  in 
a  homoiogenous  than  in  an  autogenous  or  syngenesious  relationship,  but 
homoiogenous  reactions  injure  a  transplant,  whereas  they  are  as  a  rule  bene- 
ficial in  pollination.  Furthermore,  in  transplantation  we  noticed  in  certain 
instances  marked  differences  in  the  types  of  reaction  resulting  from  a  reversal 
of  the  relationship  between  transplant  and  host,  and  in  a  similar  way,  dif- 
ferences were  observed  in  certain  plants  in  the  case  of  reciprocal  fertilization. 
There  is  another  observation  which  is  of  special  interest  because  it  corresponds 
to  certain  findings  in  transplantation.  If  the  same  plant  is  pollinated  by  two 
different  types  of  pollen,  each  one  behaves  in  its  own  way,  uninfluenced  by 
the  presence  of  the  other.  In  a  similar  way  we  have  found  that  in  case  of  simul- 
taneous transplantation  of  pieces  of  tissues  from  two  different  donors  into 
the  same  host,  the  specific  reactions,  as  determined  by  the  mutual  relation- 
ships between  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  various  transplants  and 
the  host,  take  place  around  each  transplant  in  their  characteristic  manner, 
without  any  influence  of  the  other  transplant  being  noticeable. 

However,  there  are  also  important  differences  between  transplantation  and 
pollination.  While  in  transplantation  an  autogenous  condition  is  the  most 
favorable  one  for  a  satisfactory  union  between  host  and  graft,  in  fertilization 
identity  of  the  specific  substances  which  come  into  play  is  in  many  cases 
unfavorable  for  the  production  of  a  fertilized  ovum.  There  is  an  additional 
difference  in  that  in  the  former  all  degrees  of  gradations  in  the  results  occur, 
whereas,  in  fertilization  we  find  either  compatibility  or  non-compatibility,  the 
latter  leading  to  sterility;  no  inter-grades  exist  as  far  as  the  end  result  con- 
sisting in  the  fertilization  of  a  single  ovum  by  a  spermatozoon  is  concerned. 
In  the  pollination  process,  itself,  it  is  nevertheless  possible  to  recognize  certain 
gradations  in  the  degree  of  compatibility  between  the  male  and  female  cells, 
as  is  indicated  by  the  varying  rapidity  of  the  downgrowth  of  the  pollen-tube, 
and  in  some  cases,  by  the  number  of  eggs  which  are  fertilized  and  of  embryos 
which  develop  in  a  normal  manner. 


SELF  FERTILIZATION  319 

As  to  the  causes  of  these  differences  between  transplantation  and  fertiliza- 
tion, we  may  consider  the  following  facts :  Correns  as  well  as  East,  in  their 
analysis  of  self-sterility,  compared  the  results  of  various  combinations,  some 
of  which  correspond  to  a  syngenesious,  others  to  a  homoiogenous  relation- 
ship. They  observed  the  behavior  of  sperm  and  tgg,  or  of  pollen-tube  and 
style,  toward  each  other  in  individuals  closely  related,  as  well  as  in  those  not 
closely  related  though  belonging  to  the  same  species.  In  the  case  of  fertiliza- 
tion, the  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  family  could  be  arranged  in  a  few 
groups  in  such  a  way  that  all  the  members  of  the  same  group  behaved  in  an 
identical  manner,  whereas  in  the  case  of  transplantation  various  gradations 
could  be  found  in  syngenesious  reactions,  ranging  from  those  seen  in  autog- 
enous, to  those  seen  in  homoiogenous  transplantations. 

There  remains  still  to  be  considered  a  third  difference  between  transplanta- 
tion and  fertilization.  While  after  autotransplantation  antagonistic  reactions 
between  host  and  transplant  in  higher  organisms  are  lacking,  in  syngenesio- 
transplantation  they  occur  sooner  or  later  if  sensitive  tissues  are  used.  On 
the  other  hand,  in  some  experiments  in  plants  fertilization  between  members 
of  the  same  group  (syngenesious  fertilization)  and  self-fertilization  were 
equally  unsuccessful,  while  fertilization  between  individuals  belonging  to 
different  groups  did  succeed.  However,  a  condition  corresponding  to  what 
we  find  in  auto-  and  syngenesiotransplantation  in  mammalian  tissues,  has 
been  observed  by  Correns  also  in  the  case  of  fertilization  in  a  plant,  namely, 
in  Tolemiea  Menziesii.  Here,  individuals  of  the  Fx  generation  can  be  readily 
fertilized  by  one  another,  as  well  as  with  both  parents,  whereas  self- 
fertilization  is  impossible.  This  may  be  considered  as  another  type  of  self- 
sterility  and  it  corresponds  to  what  we  find  in  transplantation  if  we  choose, 
for  instance,  the  thyroid  gland  as  a  test  object,  and  the  presence  or  absence  of 
a  reaction  as  the  standard  for  measurement.  In  transplantation  as  well  as  in 
the  case  of  fertilization  in  Tolemiea,  it  appears  that  a  greater  number  of  factors 
is  required  than  in  the  other  instances  of  pollination,  mentioned  above,  in  order 
to  explain  the  results  in  accordance  with  the  rules  of  Mendelian  heredity. 

In  hetero-pollination,  including  pollination  between  different  varieties  as 
well  as  between  different  species,  there  may  develop  disharmonies  of  various 
kinds,  which  may  be  similar  to  those  observed  in  attempted  self-fertilization. 
Thus,  lack  of  germination  of  the  pollen-grain  and  inhibition  in  the  down- 
growth  of  the  pollen-tube  into  the  style  may  be  noted  in  both  cases;  like- 
wise, in  hetero-pollination  there  may  be  in  addition  an  interference  with 
those  mechanisms  which  direct  the  movement  of  the  pollen-tube  through  the 
micropyle  toward  the  ovulum.  It  seems,  therefore,  that  the  specific  chemo- 
tropically  active  substances,  which  function  under  these  conditions,  are  not 
interacting  in  a  normal  manner  with  the  pollen-tube.  The  relationship  between 
substances  of  this  kind  and  the  pollen-tube  is  evidently  a  specific  one,  which 
is  graded  in  accordance  with  the  genetic  relationship  between  the  interacting 
organisms,  and  these  substances  behave,  therefore,  in  this  respect,  in  a  manner 
similar  to  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  tissues  in  higher  organisms. 

But  if  hetero-fertilization  should  actually  take  place,  leading  to  the  produc- 


320  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tion  of  hybrids,  the  germ  cells  in  the  latter  may  have  abnormal  numbers  of 
chromosomes.  Besides,  abnormalities  in  the  reduction  division  and,  further- 
more, a  non-disjunction  of  chromosomes  may  be  observed.  Still  later,  in- 
compatibilities may  become  manifest  between  the  nuclei  of  the  male  and 
female  germ  cells  if  fertilization  between  hybrids  should  be  attempted.  Con- 
ditions are,  then,  in  these  respects,  analogous  in  plants  and  in  animals;  in 
both,  a  homoiogenous  relationship  between  the  substances  produced  in  cells 
belonging  to  the  male  or  female  organism,  as  well  as  between  the  cytoplasm 
and  the  nuclei  of  the  gametes,  is  most  conducive  to  the  normal  development 
of  a  new  organism. 

II.  While  in  higher  plants  the  prevention  of  self-fertilization  occurs  in 
many  species,  in  hermaphroditic  animals  it  has  been  observed  so  far  only  in 
several  ascidians,  and  especially  in  Ciona.  In  other  animals,  for  instance, 
the  oligochaetae,  self-fertilization  may  occur  and  lead  to  the  normal  de- 
velopment of  the  ovum,  and  even  self-copulation  may  take  place  in  certain 
species. 

The  fact  of  self-sterility  in  Ciona  was  first  observed  by  Castle,  and  its 
mechanism  has  been  studied  especially  by  T.  H.  Morgan.  According  to  Mor- 
gan self -sterility  in  this  species  depends  on  a  condition  in  the  egg  membranes, 
which  prevents  the  entrance  of  spermatozoa  derived  from  the  same  individual, 
whereas  spermatozoa  from  individuals  which  were  not  the  bearers  of  the 
eggs  were  able  to  penetrate  through  the  membranes.  A  short  treatment  of  the 
egg  membrane  with  acid  makes  the  latter  permeable  also  for  the  spermato- 
zoa from  the  same  individual;  likewise,  the  use  of  dense  sperm  suspensions 
renders  the  chances  of  self-fertilization  better.  However,  it  has  not  been 
possible  to  extract  substances  from  the  eggs  or  sperm  which  noticeably  in- 
fluenced the  results  of  self-  or  cross-fertilization.  In  different  ascidian  species, 
the  readiness  with  which  self-fertilization  succeeds  varies;  it  is  greatest  in 
Molgula,  intermediate  in  Styela,  and  very  rare  in  Ciona.  It  is  the  sameness 
in  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  spermatozoon  and  the  ovum  which  tends 
to  prevent  fertilization  and  a  difference  in  this  constitution  which  makes 
possible  self-fertilization.  Morgan  suggests  that  self-fertilization  may  be- 
come possible  as  a  result  of  a  mutation,  which  alters  the  genetic  constitution 
of  a  spermatozoon  and  makes  it  unlike  that  of  the  egg.  It  is  not  known  how 
many  genetic  factors  are  involved  in  this  process  of  self-sterility. 

It  seems  then  that  the  mechanism  which  prevents  self-fertilization  in 
Nicotiana,  Petunia  and  some  other  plants,  and  in  ascidians,  is  not  the  same, 
inasmuch  as  in  the  latter  it  depends  on  the  relations  between  spermatozoon 
and  egg  membrane,  whereas,  in  the  former,  it  depends  largely  on  the  inter- 
action between  ovary  and  pollen-tube;  but  also  in  plants,  self-fertilization 
may  be  inhibited  in  certain  instances  by  incompatibility  between  the  fertilizing 
element  in  the  pollen-tube  and  the  ovum,  as  well  as  by  the  usual  mechanisms. 
The  processes  which  prevent  self-fertilization  in  these  plants  and  in  ascidians 
agree,  in  so  far  as  in  both,  genetic  factors  determine  primarily  whether  or 
not  self-fertilization  can  take  place;  but  the  effects  exerted  by  these  genetic 
factors  differ.  As  to  the  number  of  genetic  factors  involved  in  these  processes, 


SELF  FERTILIZATION  321 

in  plants  it  is  assumed  that  this  is  very  small,  but  there  is  the  possibility 
that,  actually,  also  a  larger  number  may  control  this  mechanism.  In  ascidians, 
it  is  at  least  possible  that  the  number  of  determining  genes  may  be  consider- 
able and  that  in  this  respect  the  latter  resemble  the  factors  which  determine 
the  individuality  differentials  in  the  somatic  cells  of  higher  organisms. 

In  conclusion  it  may  then  be  stated  that  while  in  transplantation  of  tissues 
in  higher  adult  organisms  incompatibilities  in  the  interaction  of  host  and 
transplant  are  avoided  only  when  autogenous  relations  exist,  in  fertilization, 
in  general,  a  homoiogenous  relationship  produces  the  most  adequate  results 
and  the  subsequent  perfect  development  of  the  embryo,  although  in  various 
plants  and  animals  autogenous  fertilization  occurs  normally,  without  injurious 
consequences.  As  to  heterogenous  fertilization,  this  leads,  as  a  rule,  to  in- 
jurious results  in  plants  as  well  as  in  animals,  but  in  different  instances  the 
distance  in  relationship  between  spermatozoon  and  egg,  which  results  in 
abnormalities,  varies.  Thus  in  the  case  of  Zea  Mays,  Demerec  observed  that 
in  the  variety  "everta",  homoiogenous  as  well  as  autogenous  fertilization 
was  successful,  but  that  fertilization  with  other  varieties  of  Mays  did  not 
succeed.  Usually  we  must  assume  that  species  differences  between  male  and 
female  plants  produce  an  injurious  effect  greater  than  that  characteristic  of 
variety  differences.  On  the  other  hand',  certain  heterogenous  fertilizations  in 
Echinoderms  may  lead  to  the  formation  of  normal  organisms  as  far  as  somatic 
differentiation  is  concerned,  although  the  parents  belong  to  different  genera  or 
even  to  different  orders. 

In  general,  homoio- fertilization  is  the  normal  process  most  conducive  in 
plants  and  animals  to  an  undisturbed  development  of  the  embryo  and  the 
chromosomes  and  cytoplasm  of  the  germ  cells  are  not  adversely  affected  by 
such  a  relationship.  We  find,  then,  in  the  interaction  between  spermatozoon 
or  pollen-tube  and  egg  or  ovary,  reactions  which  presuppose  the  presence 
of  individual  and  species  substances  or  of  mechanisms  which  are  characterized 
by  a  great  sensitiveness  to  these  individual  and  species  differences.  The 
individuality  differentials  of  higher  adult  animal  organisms  are  not  yet  de- 
veloped in  these  less  developed  cells  and  tissues,  but  there  is  reason  for  assum- 
ing that  the  latter  possess  the  precursors  of  organismal  differentials.  It  is  pos- 
sible that  such  precursor  substances  are  involved  in  the  individual  reactions 
noted  in  these  cells  and  tissues,  at  least  in  some  instances ;  on  the  other  hand,  it 
is  also  possible  that  substances  of  a  special  kind  are  concerned  in  these  re- 
actions. Such  substances  and  mechanisms  of  a  special  kind  are  present  in 
certain  protozoa,  and  the  terms  "organismal  and  individuality  differentials" 
apply  to  these  cases  only  in  a  wider  sense.  In  a  specific  sense,  they  refer  only 
to  the  adult  tissues  of  higher  vertebrates. 

Inbreeding:  There  is  a  condition  intermediate  between  self-fertilization  and 
homoiogenous  fertilization,  namely,  syngenesio-fertilization.  This  is  a  process 
which  corresponds  to  inbreeding.  In  higher  organisms,  close  inbreeding  is 
effected  by  means  of  successive,  long-continued  brother  and  sister  mating. 
As  a  result  of  this  procedure  the  genetic  constitution  of  such  inbred  individ- 
uals becomes  gradually  more  and  more  similar,  until  in  the  end,  syngenesio- 


322  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

fertilization  may  approach  auto-fertilization.  Thus  a  homozygous  constitution 
may  be  nearly  attained  in  both  the  germ  cells  as  well  as  in  the  somatic  cells 
of  the  adult  forms,  in  constrast  to  the  heterozygous  condition  which  char- 
acterizes, as  a  general  rule,  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species  but  to 
different  families  or  lines,  which  are  not  closely  related  to  one  another  in  their 
genetic  constitution  and  whose  germ  cells  unite  in  the  process  of  homoio- 
fertilization.  As  the  outcome  of  continued  inbreeding,  individual  differences 
are  more  and  more  lost. 

As  stated,  the  individuals  of  higher  species  of  animals  are,  usually,  in 
accordance  with  accepted  terminology,  heterozygous  as  far  as  their  genetic 
constitution  is  concerned.  However,  in  order  to  indicate  the  relationship  which 
exists  between  the  different  types  of  fertilization,  on  the  one  hand,  and  of 
transplantation  and  organismal  differentials,  on  the  other,  it  might  be  ad- 
vantageous to  designate  as  homoiozygosis  the  normal  condition  resulting 
from  homoio-fertilization,  which,  as  we  have  seen,  corresponds  to  a  homoio- 
transplantation.  As  a  consequence  of  close  inbreeding  the  normal  homoio- 
zygosis passes,  then,  into  a  state  which  might  be  designated  as  syngenesio- 
zygosis,  until  at  last  a  condition  is  approached  corresponding  to  autozygosis, 
but  generally  designated  as  homozygosis.  By  adopting  the  term  "autozygosis", 
we  would  express  the  genetic  relationship  to  one  another  of  the  gene  sets 
which  have  been  brought  together  in  the  fertilized  ovum  and  in  the  individual 
developing  therefrom,  in  cases  in  which  self-fertilization  is  the  normal 
process,  or  a  genetic  relationship  which  may  be  approached  in  cases  in  which 
long-continued  close  inbreeding  through  many  generations  has  preceded  the 
mating  of  the  germ  cells.  Heterozygosis,  in  the  sense  in  which  this  term  is 
used  by  geneticists,  would  then  correspond  to  homoiozygosis,  and  the  homo- 
zygous condition  of  the  geneticist  would  correspond  to  autozygosis,  in  the 
sense  in  which  the  corresponding  terms  would  be  applied  in  transplantation. 
In  the  genetic  analysis  of  the  effects  of  inbreeding  and  of  transplantation, 
we  have  to  deal  with  closely  related  problems ;  but  this  relationship  is  some- 
what obscured  by  the  terminology  used,  and,  in  particular,  by  attributing  to 
the  terms  "hetero"  and  "homoio"  different  meanings  in  the  case  of  fertiliza- 
tion and  transplantation.  The  term  "heterozygosis",  as  it  is  used  in  breeding, 
is  really  meant  to  designate  a  dissimilarity  in  the  gene  sets  of  the  different 
individuals  which  are  mated.  In  order  to  accentuate  the  mutual  strangeness 
of  the  gene  sets  or  genes  combined  in  zygotes,  this  condition  might  be  desig- 
nated as  "allozygous",  in  contrast  to  the  "isozygous"  condition,  which  would 
correspond  to  the  homozygous  state  in  the  ordinary  meaning  of  this  term. 

In  our  discussion  of  transplantation  we  have  analyzed  the  effects  of  close 
inbreeding  on  the  fate  of  the  graft.  It  may  therefore  be  of  interest  to  com- 
pare with  the  latter,  the  effects  of  close  inbreeding  on  the  character  of  the 
offspring.  It  has  been  observed  that  in  many  instances  the  individuals  of  the 
first  generation,  Flf  derived  from  two  parents  possessing  genetic  constitutions 
differing  within  a  certain  range,  show  an  increase  in  size,  fertility  and, 
strength,  as  compared  with  the  parents,  but  in  continuing  the  breeding  of 


SELF  FERTILIZATION  323 

this  strain  by  brother  and  sister  mating  no  further  improvement  occurs,  and 
very  often  deterioration  finally  takes  place  as  a  result  of  close  inbreeding. 

East  and  Jones  explained  the  results  of  inbreeding  in  accordance  with  the 
rules  of  Mendelian  heredity.  The  parents  belonging  to  two  different  inbred 
strains  possess  genetic  constituents  which  differ  from  each  other.  In  fertilized 
ova,  giving  rise  to  the  Fx  generation,  a  large  number  of  the  dominant  factors 
from  both  parents  are  brought  together,  and  this  combination  may  cause 
an  increase  in  size,  fertility  and  strength  of  the  F1  hybrids.  This  is  per- 
haps due  to  the  fact  that  mutations  are  mostly  recessive  and  injurious  and 
that  these  injurious  effects  become  manifest  if  two  recessive  alleles  are  com- 
bined in  the  offspring.  In  the  F1  generation,  the  chances  that  these  injurious 
recessive  factors  become  manifest  are  slight  as  compared  to  the  genetic 
constitution  in  inbred  strains.  If  the  Fx  hybrids  are  inbred  the  advantages 
gained  in  Fx  disappear  again.  In  the  F2  and  following  generations,  these 
dominant  factors  again  become  segregated  in  the  large  majority  of  the  in- 
dividuals and  a  loss  of  the  advantages  gained  in  the  Fx  generation  may  take 
place,  until,  as  the  result  of  continued  inbreeding,  the  individuals  have  again 
reached  a  condition  in  which  they  all  have  acquired  essentially  the  same,  or 
at  least  a  very  similar  genetic  composition,  and  then  no  further  deterioration 
needs  to  take  place.  The  increased  vigor  In  the  F2  generation  of  hybrids,  due 
to  the  bringing  together  in  the  same  individual  of  factors  which  are  derived 
from  different  lines,  and  especially  of  dominant  favorable  genes  which  pre- 
vent the  injurious  effects  of  recessive  mutants  from  becoming  manifest,  is  a 
condition  called  "heterosis".  In  accordance  with  what  we  have  stated  above, 
inasmuch  as  in  inbreeding  in  the  beginning  two  individuals  are  united,  belong- 
ing not  to  two  different  species  but  to  the  same  species,  although  to  two 
different  lines  or  perhaps  to  different  varieties,  it  would  be  preferable  to 
designate  this  stimulated  state  in  the  Fx  hybrids  as  homoiosis,  depending  on 
a  "homoiozygous"  in  contrast  to  an  "autozygous"  condition  of  the  gene  sets. 
Such  a  state  of  homoiosis  would  then,  in  the  course  of  further  inbreeding 
be  followed  by  a  state  of  syngeniosis  and  ultimately  by  one  approaching 
autosis.  In  some  instances,  even  a  certain  stimulation  may  result  from  fertili- 
zation, when  the  two  germ  cells  belong  to  different  though  closely  related 
species.  In  the  latter  case  we  would  have  to  deal  with  a  true  heterosis.  How- 
ever, according  to  common  usage  the  term  "heterosis"  is  meant  to  signify 
the  beneficial  effects  derived  from  the  fact  that  unlike  genes  derived  from 
unlike  parents  are  combined  in  the  same  individual,  and  furthermore,  it 
attributes  to  this  unlikeness  of  the  genes  certain  effects  without  regard  as  to 
whether  the  relationship  of  the  genes  is  a  heterogenous  or  a  homoiogenous 
one.  If  it  is  desired  to  express  merely  the  mutual  strangeness  of  the  genes 
derived  from  the  two  different  parents,  we  might  apply  the  term  "allosis"  to 
the  condition  usually  designated  as  heterosis. 

According  to  East  and  Jones,  the  injurious  effects  of  inbreeding  are  then 
due  to  combinations  of  certain  recessive  allelomorph  genes  in  the  same  in- 
dividual; injurious  conditions  which  had  existed  previously  in  a  potential 


324  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

state,  but  which  had  been  hidden,  thus  become  manifest.  The  inbreeding  as 
such  is  not  necessarily  injurious,  provided  the  genetic  constitution  of  both 
parents  is  a  very  favorable  one. 

The  deterioration  caused  by  inbreeding  in  animals  can,  perhaps,  to  a  certain 
extent  be  mitigated  and  delayed  through  continuous  selection  of  the  most 
vigorous  individuals  of  the  inbred  strain  for  breeding  purposes ;  such  a  selec- 
tion was  made  in  the  breeding  experiments  in  rats  by  H.  D.  King  and  it  is 
possible  that  by  these  means  a  severe  deterioration  was  avoided,  at  least  for 
a  long  time.  We  may  assume  that  presumably  in  using  the  strongest  in- 
dividuals, in  most  cases  also  the  most  allozygous  (or  heterozygous,  according 
to  the  usual  terminology)  individuals  were  chosen,  and  thus  the  approach 
to  an  autozygous  condition  was  delayed.  Evidently  a  homoiogenous  com- 
bination of  genes  in  a  zygote  and  in  the  individual  subsequently  formed  is 
most  favorable  for  the  best  development  of  a  higher  animal  organism ;  con- 
versely, a  condition  of  autosis  in  fertilization  may  lead  to  deterioration.  In 
this  respect  gene  combinations  in  the  fertilized  ovum  differ  from  the  com- 
binations of  gene  derivatives,  the  individuality  differentials,  as  they  are  accom- 
plished in  transplantation  of  tissues.  Here,  as  we  have  seen,  the  autogenous 
combination  is  the  most  favorable  one;  a  syngenesio-,  and  still  more  so, 
a  homoio-  and  a  hetero-combination  are  injurious.  However,  it  is  possible 
also  that  a  combination  of  genes  derived  from  two  unlike  parents  may  lead 
to  a  summation  of  two  beneficial  conditions  and  that  this  summation  may 
produce  favorable  physiological  conditions  in  the  hybrid.  Such  an  effect 
seems  to  have  been  observed  by  Robbins  in  two  races  of  tomatoes  in  which 
the  hybrid  Fx  presumably  possessed  the  combined  ability  of  both  parents  to 
synthesize  certain  vitamines  B. 

From  a  physiological  point  of  view,  it  has  also  been  suggested  that  a 
combination  of  genes  which  differ  within  a  certain  range  of  intensity  in  the 
Fj  generation,  leads  to  the  development  in  the  embryo  of  a  substance  or  of 
substances,  which  are  slightly  different  from  those  to  which  the  fertilized 
ovum  and  the  developing  embryo  are  adapted,  and  that  this  condition  if 
present  within  a  certain  range  of  concentration  exerts  a  stimulating  effect, 
while  a  substance  which  exceeds  a  certain  degree  of  strangeness  may  cause 
injurious  effects.  This  formulation  recalls  the  so-called  Arndt-Schultz  rule, 
according  to  which  very  small  doses  of  toxic  substances,  instead  of  having 
an  injurious  effect,  on  the  contrary,  may  exert  a  stimulating  effect.  It  was 
especially  Lohner  who,  in  comparing  the  effects  of  inbreeding  and  of  fer- 
tilization of  ova  by  less  nearly  related  sperm,  applied  the  Arndt-Schultz  rule 
to  their  analysis.  We  should  then  attribute  the  advantage  of  homoio-fertiliza- 
tion  over  close  inbreeding  to  the  stimulation  caused  by  a  greater  mutual 
strangeness  of  the  genes  in  the  former  process,  as  compared  with  the  great 
similarity  of  the  genes  in  the  latter.  Furthermore,  cross-fertilization  between 
different  subspecies,  or  between  certain  very  nearly  related  species,  on  ac- 
count of  the  still  greater  mutual  dissimilarities  of  the  combining  genes,  might 
be  even  more  beneficial  and  exert  also  the  effects  characteristic  of  heterosis 
(allosis)  ;  however,  if  the  dissimilarities  between  the  genes  exceed  a  certain 


SELF  FERTILIZATION  325 

limit,  toxic  effects  would  predominate  and  disharmonies  would  occur  in  the 
process  of  fertilization  or  in  the  development  of  the  embryos.  If  we  accept 
this  mode  of  interpretation,  we  should  have  to  assume  that  in  homoiogenous 
fertilization,  which  represents  the  normal  process,  the  injurious  effects  of  in- 
breeding are  avoided,  because  in  the  former  case  there  is  provided  the  stimu- 
lation which  slightly  toxic  substances  exert  on  the  developing  ovum.  We 
would  then  have  to  deal  with  substances,  the  character  of  which  depends 
upon  the  relationship  between  the  male  and  female  germ  cells,  a  certain 
distance  of  relationship,  but  one  not  exceeding  a  definite  limit,  giving  the  best 
results. 

Of  interest  in  this  connection  are  also  the  experiments  of  Demoll,  who 
found  that  the  injurious  results  of  inbreeding  in  mice  can  apparently  be 
neutralized  by  administration  of  small  doses  of  arsenic  to  the  breeding  in- 
dividuals. It  seems,  however,  that  in  the  deterioration  caused  by  inbreeding 
we  have  essentially  to  deal  with  genetic  reactions  and  that  arsenic,  if  it  should 
be  potent  at  all,  merely  prevents  some  of  the  injurious  results  from  becom- 
ing manifest,  without  essentially  changing  the  underlying  causes  of  the 
deterioration.  Such  a  method  would  therefore  represent  merely  a  symptomatic 
treatment,  and  with  this  interpretation  agrees  the  fact  mentioned  by  Demoll, 
although  not  interpreted  by  him  in  this  way,  that  following  the  cessation  of 
the  arsenic  administration  the  injurious  consequences  of  inbreeding  again 
became  manifest. 

Demoll  furthermore  attributed  the  favorable  effect  of  homoiogenous  com- 
binations of  sperm  and  egg  to  the  formation  of  antibodies,  the  strange  sper- 
matozoon acting  as  an  antigen  in  the  egg  and  eliciting  here,  or  in  the  develop- 
ing embryo,  the  production  of  antibodies,  which  interact  with  the  antigen. 
However,  the  production  of  antibodies  presupposes  the  presence  of  mecha- 
nisms which,  to  our  knowledge,  form  only  during  the  later  embryonal,  or  even 
post-embryonal  life.  Within  the  same  organism  all  the  constituent  normal 
parts  have,  as  far  as  their  mutual  relations  are  concerned,  an  autogenous 
character  and  they  are  therefore  not  able  to  function  as  antigens.  Thus  it  is 
hardly  conceivable  that  in  mechanisms  so  well  regulated  as  are  those  of 
embryonal  development,  abnormal  processes  of  a  variable  character,  such 
as  the  formation  of  antibodies,  should  play  a  role. 

We  mention  these  physiological  viewpoints,  although  the  interpretation  of 
East  and  Jones,  as  to  the  mechanisms  by  means  of  which  inbreeding  exerts 
its  injurious  effects,  seems  to  have  been  generally  accepted  by  geneticists. 
However,  genetic  and  physiological  modes  of  interpretation  are  not  neces- 
sarily mutually  exclusive. 


Chapter  $ 

The  Relations  Between  Hybridization 
and  Transplantation 

In  the  preceding  two  chapters  we  have  analyzed  the  relationship  which 
connects  fertilization  and  hybridization  with  the  organismal  differen- 
tials of  the  organisms  which  play  a  part  in  these  processes,  the  term 
"organismal  differentials"  being  used  in  the  wider  sense.  We  have  stated  that 
in  fertilization  and  hybridization  the  interaction  between  the  male  germ  cells 
and  certain  somatic  tissues  in  the  female,  the  interaction  between  the  chromo- 
somes of  spermatozoon  and  egg,  and  between  the  genes  they  contain,  and 
also  the  interaction  between  the  cytoplasm  of  the  ovum  and  the  male  and 
female  nuclear  substances,  as  well  as  the  action  of  certain  substances  which 
develop  during  embryonal  development,  have  to  be  taken  into  account.  It 
was  considered  at  least  possible  that  some  of  the  substances  involved  in  these 
processes  are  the  precursors  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  adult 
organisms.  In  transplantation  of  adult  tissues  we  are  concerned  with  the 
relations  to  each  other  of  fully  developed  organismal  and  organ  differentials 
in  host  and  transplant.  It  is  certain  that  the  results  in  both  transplantation  and 
hybridization  depend  upon  the  genetic  relationship  between  the  two  inter- 
acting organisms.  While,  thus,  transplantation  and  fertilization,  and  in  par- 
ticular hybridization,  have  certain  important  factors  in  common,  they  differ 
in  other  features,  and  we  should  therefore  expect,  in  addition  to  certain  paral- 
lelisms between  the  feasibility  of  hybridization  and  transplantation,  the  oc- 
currence of  definite  differences  between  these  two  processes.  These  have 
been  discussed  from  general  points  of  view  in  the  preceding  chapters,  when 
we  analyzed  and  compared  transplantation  in  higher  adult  and  in  phyloge- 
netically  and  ontogenetically  more  primitive  organisms  and  the  relations  which 
exist  between  transplantation  and  fertilization. 

There  still  remains  the  question  as  to  whether  actual  experiments  in  trans- 
plantation support  the  assumption  that  a  parallelism  exists  between  the 
ability  to  make  successful  transplantations  between  different  species  and  the 
ability  to  hybridize  these  species.  Schoene  suggested,  in  1912,  that  hetero- 
transplantation might  be  possible  between  hybridizable  species,  but  he  also 
pointed  out  that  while  hybridization  can  take  place  between  rat  and  mouse, 
transplantation  of  skin  from  rat  to  mouse,  and  vice  versa,  does  not  succeed ; 
however,  it  is  doubtful  whether  hybridization  between  rat  and  mouse  can 
actually  be  accomplished  either. 

As  stated  previously,  the  most  extensive  experiments  in  which  the  existence 
of  a  parallelism  between  transplantability  and  hybridization  was  tested  were 
carried  out  by  W.  Schultz.  He  attempted  to  prove  that  these  two  conditions 
follow  a  parallel  course  and  that  a  wide  cleft  exists  between  hybridizable  and 
non-hybridizable  animals  as  far  as  the  mutual  transplantability  of  their  tissues 

326 


HYBRIDIZATION  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  327 

is  concerned.  He  made  still  finer  gradations  in  accordance  with  Poll's  ter- 
minology, distinguishing  between  tokonoth  hybrids,  which  are  fertile,  and 
steironoth  hybrids,  which  are  sterile ;  the  disharmony  in  the  constitution  of 
the  parent  strains  giving  rise  to  the  former,  should  be  less  than  that  giving 
rise  to  the  latter.  Accordingly,  he  finds  that  exchange  of  tissues  between 
species  with  tokonoth  hybrids  gives  the  better  results.  We  shall  first  cite 
certain  examples  of  Schultz's  observations  and  then  discuss  some  of  the 
factors  complicating  his  transplantations.  Such  a  discussion  will  provide  an 
opportunity  to  state  also  some  of  the  principles  which  apply  to  transplantation 
in  general. 

I.  Experiments  in  Amphibia.  Skin  of  Bufo  vulgaris  transplanted  to  Bufo 
viridis  remained  alive  one  hundred  days,  and  the  reciprocal  transplant,  fifteen 
to  thirty  days ;  these  two  species  can  be  hybridized.  Skin  grafted  from  Rana 
temporaria  to  Rana  arvalis  lived  eighty  days,  the  reciprocal  transplant,  one 
hundred  days.  In  these  cases  in  which  the  skin  was  exchanged  between  hy- 
bridizable  species  the  results  were  therefore  relatively  good.  On  the  other 
hand,  skin  transplanted  from  Hyla  arborea  to  Rana  esculenta  remained  alive 
only  ten  to  twenty  days.  These  two  species  not  being  hybridizable,  the  life 
of  the  transplant  was  shorter.  However,  also  transplantation  of  skin  from 
Rana  temporaria  to  Rana  esculenta  may  give  very  good  results  and  the  graft 
may  remain  alive  for  more  than  one  hundred  days,  although  these  two  species 
are  not  hybridizable.  Exchange  of  tissues  between  urodele  and  anuran  am- 
phibia was  unsuccessful. 

The  principal  results  obtained  by  Schultz  in  the  heterotransplantation  of 
amphibian  skin  may  be  summarized  as  follows :  Length  of  time  during  which 
transplants  remained  alive  after:  (a)  Transplantation  of  skin  between  hybrid- 
izable species. 
Exchange  of  tissues  between  Rana  temporaria  and  Rana  arvalis : 

70  to  105  days. 
Transplantation  from  Bufo  vulgaris  to  Bufo  viridis :  100  days. 

From  Bufo  viridis  to  Bufo  vulgaris  :  15  to  30  days. 
(b)  Transplantation  of  skin  between  non-hybridicable  species. 

From  Bufo  viridis  to  Rana  esculenta :  10  to  20  days. 

From  Hyla  to  Rana:  early  death  of  host  as  well  as  of  transplant. 

From  Rana  esculenta  to  Rana  temporaria :  40  days. 

From  Rana  temporaria  to  Rana  esculenta:  130  days. 

From  Salamander  to  Rana  esculenta :  8  to  10  days. 
It  is  evident  that  there  is  no  complete  correspondence  between  compatibility 
of  host  and  transplant  and  hybridizability.  It  is  furthermore  probable  that 
toxic  actions,  due  to  other  factors  than  organismal  differentials,  play  a  role, 
at  least  in  some  of  these  transplantations. 

II.  Experiments  in  Birds.  Schultz  finds  that  the  skin  of  the  canary  when 
transplanted  to  hybridizable  species  remains  alive  up  to  twenty-five  days  and 
during  that  time  shows  mitoses,  whereas  after  transplantation  to  the  pigeon, 
with  which  the  canary  is  not  hybridizable,  the  skin  is  found  necrotic  after 
seventeen  days.  Skin  exchanged  between  pigeon  and  laughing  dove,  which 
are  hybridizable,  remains  alive  up  to  thirty  days,  during  which  time  mitoses 


328  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

are  found,  while  in  non-hybridizable  forms  the  results  are  not  so  good. 
Pheasant  and  chicken  give  steironoth  hybrids;  skin  transplanted  from  the 
former  to  the  latter  species  shows  mitoses  after  fourteen  days.  In  skin  trans- 
planted from  chicken  to  pigeon,  which  are  non-hybridizable,  mitoses  may  be 
found  after  twelve  days.  After  transplantation  of  skin  from  the  domestic  to 
the  musk  duck,  which  are  likewise  non-hybridizable,  necrosis  is  found  from 
the  eleventh  day  on. 

Exchange  of  skin  between  hybrids  of  Pharaniamus  and  another  species 
gives  good  results,  the  skin  remaining  alive  for  twenty-eight  days,  while  skin 
transplanted  from  such  a  hybrid  to  one  of  the  parents  was  found  living  after 
eighteen  days.  However,  in  these  transplantations  the  exact  relationship  be- 
tween donor  and  host  was  not  definitely  known;  the  hybrids  may  have  been 
brothers  and  sisters  and  therefore  Schultz  may  actually  have  carried  out 
syngenesiotransplantations  in  exchanging  pieces  of  skin  between  them. 

III.  Experiments  in  Mammals.  After  transplantation  from  rabbit  to  hare, 
which  are  hybridizable,  skin  was  found  preserved  after  thirty-five  days,  but 
grafts  from  a  wild  to  a  domestic  rabbit  were  necrotic  after  thirty  days.  Skin 
of  cat  transplanted  to  rabbit  was  still  alive  and  showed  mitoses  after  eleven 
days ;  the  beginning  of  necrosis  was  observed  after  fourteen  days.  But  skin 
of  rat  transplanted  to  mouse  and  the  reciprocal  graft  showed  necrosis  from 
the  eleventh  day  on  and  there  was  marked  lymphocytic  reaction. 

In  case  of  transplantation  of  skin  from  one  variety  to  another  belonging 
to  the  same  species,  the  results  were  good.  Thus,  after  transplantation  from 
albino  to  hooded  rat  the  graft  was  found  preserved  after  thirty  days  and 
showed  mitoses  at  that  time.  Similarly,  when  skin  from  an  albino  Angora 
rabbit  was  transplanted  to  a  French  grey  rabhit,  the  results  were  satisfactory. 

However,  the  findings  of  Schultz,  that  transplants  between  different  varie- 
ties, such  as  those  mentioned  in  the  case  of  the  rat,  behave  exactly  like 
ordinary  homoiotransplants  within  the  same  species,  do  not  quite  agree  with 
our  own.  Furthermore,  Schultz  (1915)  assumed  that  no  differences  existed 
in  the  results  of  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation  of  skin,  although  marked 
differences  between  these  two  types  of  transplantation  had  already  been  well 
established. 

In  addition,  Schultz  carried  out  transplantations  also  of  ovaries.  Previ- 
ously, he  had  found  that  within  the  same  species  (rabbits  or  guinea  pigs) 
ovaries  can  be  transplanted  to  males  as  well  as  to  females.  In  the  former,  they 
remain  alive  for  at  least  four  months  and  he  concluded  therefore  that  trans- 
plantations between  different  sexes  are  less  injurious  than  those  between 
different  species.  Furthermore,  the  exchange  of  ovaries  between  different 
varieties  is  successful ;  thus,  ovaries  transplanted  from  one  variety  of  guinea 
pigs  to  another  may  survive  for  longer  than  one  hundred  and  fifty-eight  days. 
However,  regeneration  of  ovarian  tissue  takes  place  only  after  homoiotrans- 
plantation. He  believes  that  ova,  follicles,  and  other  ovarian  structures  behave 
after  transplantation  in  a  parallel  way,  and  assumes,  therefore,  that  the  same 
factors  dominate  the  fate  of  the  germ  cells  and  of  the  surrounding  ovarian 
tissue.  After  heterotransplantation  the  results  were  unfavorable,  even  in  nearly 
related  species;  exchange  of  ovaries  between  dog  and  fox  soon  led  to  the 


HYBRIDIZATION  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  329 

death  of  the  transplant.  Similarly,  after  transplantation  of  cat  ovary  to  rabbit 
there  was  early  degeneration,  although  at  first  there  may  still  have  been 
noticeable  some  mitotic  activity. 

As  we  have  seen,  in  a  general  way  a  parallelism  may  be  expected  to  exist 
between  the  transplantability  of  tissues  of  certain  organisms  and  the  possi- 
bility of  hybridizing  them,  and,  on  the  whole,  the  experiments  of  Schultz 
indicate  the  actual  existence  of  such  a  parallelism;  but  there  are  quite  a  num- 
ber of  exceptions  to  this  rule  and  to  some  of  them  we  have  already  drawn 
attention.  Thus  reciprocal  hybridizations  may  give  different  results  and  such 
results  may  not  correspond  to  those  which  are  found  in  the  case  of  corre- 
sponding reciprocal  transplantations.  We  have  pointed  out  the  differences 
which  exist  in  the  significance  of  autogenous,  syngenesious  and  homoiogenous 
relationships  in  hybridization  and  in  transplantation.  While  the  results  of 
heterogenous  relationships  are  more  similar  in  hybridization  and  transplanta- 
tion, a  perfect  correspondence  is  lacking  even  here.  But  a  strict  parallelism 
should  not  be  expected,  because  hybridization  and  transplantation,  as  pre- 
ceding chapters  have  shown,  represent  in  some  very  important  respects  very 
dissimilar  processes. 

To  mention  some  of  these  differences :  The  chromosomes  of  horse  and 
donkey  meet  in  the  somatic  cells  of  the  mule  without  any  apparent  injury  to 
cells  resulting  from  this  heterogenous  combination.  On  the  other  hand,  skin 
of  the  horse  cannot  be  grafted  successfully  to  the  donkey,  nor  does  the  re- 
ciprocal transplantation  succeed.  Furthermore,  the  fact  that  although  hybrids 
between  two  species  may  be  well  formed  and  strong,  yet  the  eggs  of  the  female 
hybrid  may  not  be  fertilized  by  the  spermatozoon  of  a  male  hybrid,  can  be 
readily  understood  if  we  consider  that  the  function  of  the  male  and  female 
chromosomes  is  not  the  same  in  the  germ  cells  and  in  the  specialized  somatic 
cells  of  the  hybrids.  The  chromosomes  of  the  germ  cells  undergo  synapsis  and 
reduction  divisions,  which  are  very  complex  processes.  Before  reduction  divi- 
sion has  taken  place,  the  sex  cells  and  the  surrounding  somatic  cells  have  the 
same  set  of  genes,  but  they  differ  following  this  occurrence.  During  reduction 
division  in  the  hybrids,  abnormalities  may  arise,  which  prevent  the  formation 
of  healthy  spermatozoa  and  ova  and  thus  lead  to  sterility. 

Schultz,  in  general,  seems  however  to  assume  that  the  mutual  interaction 
of  sex  cells  and  of  somatic  cells  is  of  the  same  kind,  and  that  the  germ  cells 
are  more  differentiated  than  the  somatic  cells,  because  they  have  the  poten- 
tiality of  reproducing  the  whole  organism.  But  early  ontogenetic  stages  of 
tissues  do  not  yet  show  the  same  degree  of  differentiation  of  organismal 
differentials  as  do  adult  tissues.  Likewise,  there  is  evidence  for  a  phylogenetic 
evolution  of  organismal  differentials.  Because  homoio-  and  even  heterotrans- 
plantation may  succeed  in  certain  amphibia,  it  does  not  necessarily  follow 
that  such  transplantations  must  succeed  also  in  mammalian  organisms. 

If  two  animals  of  the  same  species  differing  in  certain  characteristics,  as 
for  instance,  in  the  pigmentation  of  certain  parts  of  the  skin,  are  mated,  then 
in  the  F2  generation  a  segregation  of  these  allelomorphs  may  take  place.  Two 
individuals,  A  and  B,  belonging  to  the  same  litter,  may  therefore  differ  in  the 
color  of  a  certain  part  of  their  skin.  Schultz  holds  that  it  should  be  more 


330  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

difficult  to  exchange  skin  from  areas  in  A  to  B,  which  differ  in  color,  than 
from  areas  where  the  color  is  the  same  in  host  and  donor.  According  to  the 
concept  of  organismal  differentials,  on  the  other  hand,  the  same  individuality 
differential  should  attach  to  the  black  and  to  the  white  skin  in  the  same  animal, 
and  it  should  make  no  difference  as  far  as  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the 
transplant  is  concerned,  which  part  of  the  skin  of  A  is  grafted  to  B.  Of  course, 
the  tissue  differentials  of  these  two  parts  of  the  skin  might  differ  and  it  might 
thus  be  easier  to  transplant  pigmented  than  unpigmented  skin,  but  this  dif- 
ference would  apply  also  to  transplantation  of  white  and  pigmented  skin  in 
the  same  individual.  We  must  assume  that  the  tissues  in  the  same  individual 
possess  the  same  organismal  differentials  and  that  these  alone  determine  the 
specific  reaction  of  a  particular  host  against  a  transplant,  while  tissue  and 
organ  differentials  would  call  forth  the  same  reaction  in  all  hosts,  irrespective 
of  the  character  of  the  organismal  differentials  in  host  and  transplant.  When 
differences  in  tissue  or  organ  differentials  are  superimposed,  in  a  certain 
individual,  upon  those  in  organismal  differentials,  the  former  do  not  call  forth 
reactions  specific  for  an  individual  in  the  same  sense  in  which  the  latter  do. 
This  holds  good  in  general,  although  in  some  cases  the  character  of  the  tissues 
may  help  to  determine  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  individuality  differentials. 

Both  Schoene  and  Schultz  stress  the  importance  of  athrepsia  in  transplan- 
tation, by  which  is  understood  a  condition  in  the  graft  caused  by  lack  of 
foodstuffs,  mainly  of  a  protein  nature,  but  also  of  salts  which  are  specifically 
needed  by  tissues  transplanted  into  certain  hosts ;  furthermore,  importance  is 
attributed  to  anaphylactic  reactions.  Although  in  a  general  way  both  these 
authors  regard  the  presence  of  toxic  substances  as  a  possible  additional  factor 
in  determining  the  fate  of  heterotransplants,  the  existence  of  heterotoxins 
affecting  interspecies  transplantation  is  denied  by  them,  because  it  can  be 
observed  that  the  margin  of  a  transplant  may  be  better  preserved  than  its 
central  parts.  They  assume  that  if  a  heterotoxin  were  active  in  such  cases 
it  should  first  show  its  injurious  effects  in  the  peripheral  part  of  the  graft. 
However,  as  we  have  seen,  the  better  oxygen  supply  in  the  periphery  as  com- 
pared to  the  center  of  the  graft,  may  overbalance  and  obscure  the  effect  of 
specific  heterotoxins. 

There  are  still  other  secondary  factors  which  have  to  be  considered  and 
which  may  explain  some  difficulties  in  transplantation :  for  instance,  the  un- 
equal sensitiveness  of  different  tissues  to  the  lack  of  a  sufficient  amount  of 
oxygen  during  the  process  of  grafting,  or  directly  following  it,  may  play  a 
role  also  in  the  transplantation  of  the  fertilized  ovum;  differences  in  the 
structure  of  tissues,  such  as  the  density  of  the  cutis,  may  be  of  some  im- 
portance in  skin  grafting;  and  lastly,  the  different  effects  of  hormones  in 
different  hosts  and  in  the  same  hosts  under  varying  conditions,  may  affect  the 
fate  of  the  transplanted  sex  organ. 

On  account  of  the  difficulty  in  obtaining  a  sufficient  number  of  suitable 
animals  for  certain  transplantations,  the  conclusions  of  Schultz  are  based  on 
a  very  limited  number  of  experiments,  but  they,  as  well  as  our  earlier  ones, 
indicate  that  within  certain  limits  a  parallelism  exists  between  transplant- 
ability  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  between  heterogenous  hosts  and 
transplants,  and  the  experiments  of  Schultz  in  addition  suggest,  with  certain 


HYBRIDIZATION  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  331 

restrictions,  the  existence  of  a  parallelism  between  the  transplantability  of 
tissues  and  the  hybridizability  of  the  organisms  from  which  the  tissues  are 
derived. 

A  much  more  complete  correspondence  between  the  effects  of  hybridization 
and  transplantation  was  observed  in  the  more  recent  experiments  of  von 
Ubisch,  who  used,  however,  not  adult  organisms  for  transplantation,  but  early 
embryonal  stages  of  echinoderms.  When  he  transplanted  the  micromeres, 
which  give  origin  to  the  skeleton,  from  one  species,  or  even  from  one  order, 
into  another  one  in  which  the  character  of  the  skeleton  was  different  from 
that  of  the  first  species  or  order,  he  observed  the  formation  of  an  intermediate 
skeleton  in  the  plutei  derived  from  these  chimaerae ;  this  intermediate  condi- 
tion may  represent  either  a  mosaic  of  the  skeletons  of  host  and  donor,  or  a 
still  more  perfect  combination.  If  hybrids  were  produced  between  the  same 
orders  or  species  which  were  used  for  grafting,  the  hybrids  developed  a  skele- 
ton which  was  similar  to  that  which  developed  in  the  corresponding  chimaerae 
following  transplantation.  It  may  be  assumed  that  the  nuclei  of  the  two  indi- 
viduals which  give  origin  to  the  third  individual  largely  determine  the  results 
in  both  hybridization  and  in  the  formation  of  chimaerae  through  transplanta- 
tion; and  although  in  the  hybrid  every  nucleus  contains  both  maternal  and 
paternal  material,  while  in  the  chimaerae  some  cells  have  only  nuclei  of  the 
host  and  others  only  nuclei  of  the  donor,  still,  in  hybrids  and  chimaerae  the 
nuclear  material  from  both  parents,  or  from  both  host  and  donor  is  present. 
This  might  explain  the  similarity  in  the  results  of  transplantation  and  hybridi- 
zation. However,  whereas  the  chimaerae  contain  cytoplasm  of  both  species, 
the  hybrid  contains  only  the  maternal  cytoplasm.  Therefore  the  results  of 
reciprocal  hybridization  may  differ  greatly,  because  the  cytoplasm,  which  is 
present  only  in  the  female  sex  cell,  differs  in  reciprocal  crosses,  whereas  in 
the  case  of  chimaerae,  since  both  parents  contribute  cytoplasm,  the  cytoplasm 
and  therefore  also  the  results  of  reciprocal  transplantations  are  the  same.  But 
this  explanation  may  hold  good  only  for  transplantation  of  very  early  em- 
bryonal material ;  we  have  seen  that  in  further  developed  organisms  the  results 
of  reciprocal  transplantations  may  differ. 

In  the  primitive  organisms  employed  in  von  Ubisch's  experiments,  the  cells 
and  tissues  were  still  very  plastic  and  they  possessed  the  precursors  of,  rather 
than  the  fully  developed  organismal  differentials,  facts  which  may  account 
for  the  fargoing  parallelism  found  in  this  instance  between  the  results  of 
hybridization  and  transplantation,  while  such  a  parallelism  is  very  much  less 
complete  in  experiments  in  which  adult  tissues  are  used. 

Concluding  Remarks 

From  the  experiments  on  which  we  have  so  far  reported,  it  seems  to  follow 
that  organisms  in  general  represent  organismal  equilibria  which  in  the  case 
of  the  most  differentiated  organisms  may  be  autogenous;  this  means  that  all 
the  various  constituent  parts  of  organisms  possess  in  common  certain  chemical 
characteristics,  which  differ  from  those  of  all,  or  almost  all,  the  other  organ- 
isms, and  which  prevent  a  tolerance  for  contacts  between  tissues  derived  from 
strange  organisms  and,  instead,  cause  reactions  of  aggression  or  defense. 
This  applies  not  only  to  complex  metazoa,  but  also  to  certain  free-living  cells. 


332  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

The  degree  to  which  this  type  of  specificity  between  different  members  of  the 
same  group  exists  varies  according  to  the  difference  in  the  genetic  constitution 
of  different  individuals  of  such  groups,  as  well  as  according  to  the  phylo- 
genetic  and  ontogenetic  stages  of  development  which  these  organisms  have 
reached.  It  is  very  difficult,  or  perhaps  impossible  to  eliminate  entirely  these 
differences  between  different  members  of  the  same  group  through  long-con- 
tinued, close  inbreeding,  which  starts  with  two  different  individuals;  but  by 
these  means  these  differences  can  at  least  be  very  much  mitigated  in  the  course 
of  time,  the  length  of  which  varies  in  the  case  of  different  species.  These 
specificities  have  reached  their,  most  fargoing  development  in  the  highest 
organisms,  which  otherwise  are  the  most  rigid  and  the  least  modifiable  as  far 
as  their  tissue  and  organ  constitutions  and  the  interrelation  between  the  latter 
are  concerned.  They  are  at  the  lowest  stage  of  development  in  the  phylo- 
genetically  and  ontogenetically  most  primitive  organisms,  especially  as  far  as 
the  manifestation  of  these  reactions  is  concerned.  The  mechanisms  which 
underlie  such  specificities  under  different  conditions  vary  in  different  stages 
of  the  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  evolution.  In  the  course  of  the  former, 
these  specificities,  or  at  least  their  manifestations,  are  newly  created  step  by 
step,  while  in  ontogenetic  development  they  are  present  in  the  form  of  pre- 
cursor substances  and  mechanisms,  which  in  the  end  lead  to  the  complete 
formation  of  systems  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  higher  organ- 
isms. The  substances  and  the  mechanisms  on  which  the  maintenance  of  these 
equilibria  depends  may  accordingly  vary  to  a  certain  extent  under  different 
conditions. 

Thus,  in  some  free-living  single  cells  such  specificities  may  exist;  but  the 
substances  or  mechanisms  underlying  them,  and  the  reactions  which  reveal 
their  existence  may  differ,  here,  in  certain  respects  from  those  found  in  higher 
organisms,  and  such  differences  probably  exist  also  in  regard  to  the  genetic 
constitution  which  determines  these  specificities.  On  the  other  hand,  the  results 
achieved  by  these  various  modes  of  interaction  of  different  species  are  very 
similar  in  unicellular  and  the  more  complex  organisms.  As  far  as  the  indi- 
viduality differential  reactions  are  concerned,  some  very  finely  developed 
mechanisms,  indicative  of  autogenous  equilibria,  are  found  in  certain  in- 
fusoria among  the  protozoa  and  also  in  some  primitive  plants;  however,  in 
these  unicellular  organisms  also,  environmental  conditions,  in  addition  to  the 
genetic  factors,  seem  to  enter  into  the  determination  of  these  interactions  to 
a  greater  extent  than  they  do  in  higher  animals.  Moreover,  in  unicellular 
organisms  there  seems  to  be  superimposed  upon  these  autogenous  equilibria, 
a  second  type  of  mechanism,  corresponding  to  the  fertilization  process;  it 
resembles  the  types  of  interaction  which  occurs  between  the  eggs  and  sperma- 
tozoa in  higher  organisms.  In  the  latter,  the  point  of  equilibrium  is  situated 
in  the  homoiogenous  rather  than  in  the  autogenous  zone  in  the  spectrum  of 
relationships.  Different  genetic  and  phenotypic  mechanisms  underlie  these 
processes  of  interaction  in  transplantation  and  fertilization  and  these  mech- 
anisms may  vary  also  in  different  organisms,  as  for  instance,  in  ascidians  and 
in  some  plants.  However,  there  are  indications  that  even  in  fertilization 
genetic  constellations,  similar  to  those  which  determine  the  individuality  dif- 
ferentials, may  also  play  a  part. 


P^rt"      l"V         Tumors  and  Organismal  Differentials 


Introduction 
The  Nature  of  Tumors 

In  a  preceding  part  we  have  discussed  the  organismal  differentials  and, 
in  particular,  the  individuality  differentials  of  normal  tissues  and  the 
reactions  they  call  forth  in  the  host.  Under  certain  conditions  normal 
tissues  become  transformed  into  cancerous  or  so-called  malignant  tissues, 
which  possess  characteristics  differing  in  certain  respects  from  those  of  normal 
tissues.  It  will  be  of  interest  to  inquire  whether  in  this  cancerous  transforma- 
tion the  individuality  differentials  and  the  organismal  differentials,  in  general, 
also  undergo  changes ;  but  first,  we  shall  state  briefly  ( 1 )  wherein  some  of 
the  differences  between  normal  and  cancerous  tissues  consist,  and  (2)  what 
causes  this  transformation  of  normal  into  malignant  tissue. 

In  cancerous  tissues  the  growth  energy  is  increased,  at  first  usually  in  a 
localized  area;  but  this  increase  in  growth  energy  differs  from  the  increase 
observed  in  embryonal  tissue,  in  that  it  is  not  accompanied  by  progressive 
differentiation  and  in  that  often  irregularities  in  the  structure  of  cells  and 
their  nuclei  and  in  cell  multiplications  take  place.  Mitoses  may  be  abnormal, 
amitoses  and  giant-cell  formation  may  be  found.  In  the  actively  dividing  cells 
the  normal  differentiation  of  cells  and  tissues  may  be  incomplete,  but  there 
are  all  degrees  of  this  incomplete  differentiation.  The  stimulated  cells  fre- 
quently undergo  more  active  movement ;  during  these  movements  the  normal 
organization  of  the  tissues  may  partly  be  lost.  The  cells  usually  penetrate  into 
adjoining  tissues,  into  blood  and  lymph  vessels,  and  through  the  circulation 
they  may  be  carried  to  distant  places  and  here  develop  in  the  form  of  metas- 
tases. Cancerous  growth  is  a  dissociated  growth,  in  which  some  of  the  regu- 
lative factors  normally  controlling  tissues  are  no  longer  effective.  To  these 
structural  changes  correspond  certain  chemical  changes.  In  the  carbohydrate 
metabolism,  enzymatic  splitting  processes  (glycolysis)  may  predominate  over 
oxidative  processes,  especially  under  anaerobic,  but  also  under  aerobic  condi- 
tions, and  substances  such  as  lactic  acid  may  then  be  produced  in  excess. 
There  may  be  quantitative  changes  in  the  distribution  of  enzymes  and  vita- 
mins found  in  various  tumors,  on  the  one  hand,  and  in  the  normal  tissues 
from  which  they  developed,  on  the  other;  but  these  alterations  may  vary  in 
direction,  or  at  least  quantitatively,  in  different  types  of  cancer  and  in  dif- 
ferent species  of  animals.  There  may  be  still  other  changes,  chemical  or  struc- 
tural ;  however,  it  is  not  certain  whether  these  modifications  are  primary  and 
causal,  or  whether  they  are  not,  rather,  the  consequences  of  the  cancerous 
growth.  Metabolic  or  structural  abnormalities  of  a  related  kind,  although 

333 


334  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

usually  differing  in  certain  respects  from  those  noted  in  cancers,  may  be 
found  also  in  other  types  of  abnormal  growth,  as,  for  instance,  in  certain 
types  of  regenerative  or  of  the  so-called  inflammatory  growth,  or  even  in 
certain  instances,  of  excessive  hormonal-correlative  growth.  Cancerous  tissue 
behaves  essentially  like  an  originally  normal  tissue  stimulated  to  grow  and 
to  move  under  more  and  more  abnormal  conditions. 

However,  essentially  cancerous  growth  differs  from  other  types  of  ab- 
normal growth  in  that  it  is  an  irreversible  process,  whereas  regenerative, 
hormonal  and  inflammatory  growth  ceases  whenever  the  causes  which  in- 
duced these  proliferations  are  removed.  Once  a  normal  cell  has  become  can- 
cerous, it  may  die,  but  as  far  as  is  known  at  the  present  time,  it  will  not 
return  to  the  normal  state.  All  kinds  of  tissues  which  have  the  ability  to  grow 
may  become  cancerous;  cancerous  epithelial  tissue  is  called  carcinoma  and 
cancerous  mesenchymatous  tissue  is  called  sarcoma.  Also,  embryonal  tis- 
sues may  become  cancerous  and  parthenogenetically  developing  eggs  may 
give  origin  to  teratomas,  in  which  many  varieties  of  tissues  may  be  repre- 
sented. Cancerous  growths  developing  from  tissues  of  the  adult  organism 
are  classified  in  accordance  with  the  character  of  the  tissue  from  which  they 
are  derived.  In  addition  to  the  fully  cancerous,  malignant  tissues,  there  exist 
others  which  are  in  a  transitional  state.  They  form  the  so-called  benign 
tumors,  in  which  the  growth  is  increased  and  abnormal  but  slower  than  in 
the  typical  cancers,  and  in  which  it  takes  place  not  by  infiltration  of  the 
neighboring  tissues  but  by  concentric  extension,  the  differentiation  of  the 
affected  tissues  usually  occurring  in  a  more  normal  manner  than  it  does  in 
cancerous  tissues.  However,  all  kinds  of  gradations  exist  between  normal 
tissue,  benign  tumors  and  cancer,  and  while  in  the  majority  of  cases  a  benign 
tumor  remains  benign  throughout  the  life  of  the  individual,  it  may  change 
into  a  malignant  one.  When  cancer  particles  are  transplanted  into  other 
animals  of  the  same  species,  they  may,  in  the  new  host,  maintain  their 
malignant  growth  or  they  may  become  necrotic,  and  are  then  absorbed.  The 
readiness  with  which  different  tumors  can  be  transplanted  into  different 
hosts  and  individuals  differs  greatly. 

As  to  the  factors  which  induce  this  transformation  of  normal  into  can- 
cerous tissue,  three  main  sets  of  conditions  can  be  recognized :  ( 1 )  a  stimu- 
lation of  growth  which  usually  extends  over  long  periods  of  time  and  may 
show  various  degrees  of  intensity,  (2)  genetic  factors,  and  (3)  viruses  or 
virus-like  substances.  1.  Stimulating  factors:  Hormones  may  function  as 
stimulators  of  the  cancerous  transformation  and  they  elicit  cancerous  growth 
in  those  tissues  in  which  they  induce,  also,  under  normal  conditions,  growth 
processes.  Then  there  are  special  chemical,  so-called  carcinogenic  substances, 
tar  and  some  substances  which  are  constituents  of  tar  or  related  compounds; 
they  are  very  efficient  in  causing  cancer,  but  are  not  as  selective  in  regard 
to  the  tissues  which  they  affect  as  are  hormones.  Dibenzanthracene,  benz- 
pyrene  and  methylcholanthrene  are  the  best  known  among  these  substances. 
Also,  various  injuries,  inducing  long-continued,  regenerative  growth,  may 
have  similar  effects.  Ultraviolet  light,  X-rays  and  radium  may  in  the  end, 


THE  NATURE  OF  TUMORS  335 

change  normal  into  cancerous  tissues.  Lastly,  certain  metazoan  parasites,  such 
as  Bilharzia  (Schistosoma),  acting  on  the  urinary  bladder,  the  nematode 
Spiroptera  neoplastica,  affecting  the  fore-stomach  of  rats  and  mice,  and 
Taenia  crassicollis,  causing  sarcoma  in  the  liver  of  rats,  may  function  as 
cancer-producing  agents. 

All  these  stimulating  factors  have  in  common  that  they  initiate  and  main- 
tain long-continued  growth  processes.  But  hormones  are  the  only  natural 
physiological  agents  known  so  far,  which  in  this  way  induce  cancerous  proc- 
esses through  their  normal  function.  All  others  are  abnormal  agents.  Struc- 
turally estrogenic  substances  may  or  may  not  be  related  to  the  carcinogenic 
polycyclic  hydrocarbons.  Under  the  influence  of  these  stimulating  factors 
the  growth  processes,  in  the  tissues  on  which  they  act,  become  step-by-step 
more  intense,  until  they  end  in  irreversible  cancerous  proliferations.  Some- 
where during  this  preparatory  process  a  state  of  sensitization  of  the  tissue 
is  reached,  so  that  from  this  point  on,  without  as  yet  being  cancerous,  the 
tissue  will  continue  in  its  progression  to  cancer  as  a  result  of  normal  meta- 
bolic or  mechanical  factors  and  without  the  further  aid  of  the  specific  cancer- 
producing  agent.  While  the  various  stimuli  wdiich  initiate  these  growth  proc- 
esses are  important  in  the  analysis  of  cancerous  changes,  the  growth  proc- 
esses which  they  all  set  in  motion  are  probably  the  most  characteristic  and 
the  most  important  factor  in  the  origin  of  cancer.  It  has  been  tentatively 
suggested  by  us  that  during  this  preparatory  growth  period,  an  autokatalytic 
growth  substance  is  produced  or  increased  in  amount  step  by  step  and  that 
this  effects  in  the  end  the  irreversible  cancerous  state. 

(2)  Hereditary  genetic  factors  may  co-operate  with  the  stimulating  fac- 
tors in  inducing  cancer.  In  general,  the  genetic  factors,  as  far  as  they  relate 
to  the  development  of  cancer,  are  limited  to  a  specific  organ  or  tissue  and 
the  mechanism  of  the  hereditary  transmission  of  cancer  in  a  certain  organ 
may  differ  from  that  in  another  organ.  Different  tumors  are,  therefore,  in- 
dependent of  one  another  as  far  as  their  genetic  determination  is  concerned. 
These  hereditary  factors  may  be  of  diverse  kinds ;  they  may  consist  in  in- 
herited malformations  of  tissues  or  in  certain  diseases  which  cause  abnormal 
stimulation  of  tissues  in  localized  areas.  In  the  case  of  mammary  gland 
carcinoma  of  the  mouse,  which  is  a  very  common  type  of  cancer  in  that 
species,  it  has  been  found  that,  in  the  main,  differences  in  the  hereditary 
tendency  to  mammary  carcinoma  in  various  strains  corresponds  to  the  graded 
ability  of  the  mammary  gland  tissue  to  respond  with  growth  processes  to 
the  action  of  ovarian  hormones.  These  differences  in  the  responsiveness  to 
growth  stimuli  is  the  essential  factor  underlying  the  hereditary  tendency  to 
the  development  of  mammary  gland  carcinoma,  and  the  same  factor  is  pre- 
sumably active  also  in  other  types  of  cancer.  In  addition,  a  virus-like  sub- 
stance, transmitted  to  the  nursing  child  with  the  milk  of  the  mother,  but 
present  also  in  certain  organs  and  in  the  blood,  participate  in  the  production 
of  mammary  gland  carcinoma.  The  frequency  of  mammary  gland  carcinoma 
in  some  strains  may  be  zero  and  in  others  100  per  cent;  normally  it  affects, 
almost  exclusively,  females,  because  the  hormone,  estrogen,  which  in  this 


336  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

instance  represents  the  stimulating  factor,  is  present  mainly  in  the  female 
sex.  It  has  furthermore  been  observed  in  this  kind  of  cancer  that  in  hybrids 
the  mother  strain  is  much  more  potent  than  the  father  strain  in  determining 
the  cancer  rate,  and  this  is  due  to  the  factor  transmitted  with  the  milk  from 
the  nursing  mother  to  the  offspring.  An  inverse  relation  seems  to  exist  be- 
tween the  intensity  of  stimulating  factors  and  the  strength  of  the  genetic 
factors  needed  for  the  transformation  of  normal  tissues  into  cancer.  Either 
of  these  two  sets  of  factors  alone  may  be  effective  in  certain  cases,  if  it 
reaches  a  given  intensity.  This  relation  can  be  expressed  by  the  equation: 
H  (hereditary  constitution)  X  S  (stimulation)  =  C  (cancer). 

(3)  In  the  main,  three  kinds  of  viruses  or  virus-like  substances  are  known 
as  causative  factors  in  cancer,  namely,  (a)  the  virus  of  cottontail  rabbits, 
which  may  give  origin  to  papilloma,  but  under  certain  conditions,  also  to 
epidermal  cancer.  It  probably  acts  as  a  stimulating  factor,  comparable  to 
the  other  stimulating  factors  already  mentioned,  (b)  The  milk  factor,  which 
participates  in  the  origin  of  mammary  gland  carcinoma  in  mice  and  acts  in 
association  with  hormonal  and  genetic  factors.  It  may  have  also  a  slight 
effect  in  mouse  leukemia.  Its  mode  of  action  is  not  definitely  known,  but 
there  is  some  indication  that  it  also  may  act  as  a  sensitizing  factor,  (c)  In 
avian  sarcomas,  agents  can  be  separated  from  the  tumor  cells  by  filtration 
and  certain  other  means.  These  agents  seem  to  cause  this  type  of  cancer 
directly,  without  inducing  first  a  preparatory  growth  period.  They  are  largely 
but  not  entirely  species-  and  organ-specific.  They  represent  a  carcinogenic 
substance  in  the  strict  sense,  while  the  other  factors  apparently  are  growth 
promoters.  A  similar  agent  is,  perhaps,  present  in  renal  carcinoma  of  the 
frog. 

It  is  believed  by  some  investigators  that  somatic  mutations  in  tissue  cells 
may  be  responsible  for  the  origin  of  cancer;  however,  there  are  a  number 
of  facts  which  make  this  interpretation  very  improbable.  On  the  other  hand, 
mutations  which  affect  the  germ  cells  may  determine  the  degree  of  hereditary 
tendency  to  the  development  of  a  certain  type  of  cancer  in  individuals,  strains 
or  species.  Three  theories  concerning  the  origin  of  cancer  are  under  con- 
sideration at  the  present  time :  ( 1 )  The  somatic  mutation  theory  assumes 
that  all  the  other  factors  mentioned  cause  cancer  by  inducing  changes  in  the 
genes  of  a  certain  cell,  which  then  becomes  cancerous  and  gives  origin  to 
the  other  cancer  cells.  There  are  very  serious  objections  to  this  theory,  which 
is,  therefore,  in  all  probability  not  correct.  (2)  The  virus  theory  assumes 
that  viruses  are  the  essential  causes  of  all  cancers,  and  that  all  other  factors 
are  effective  only  if  they  make  it  possible  for  viruses  to  invade  cells  and  to 
activate  their  growth.  While  the  possibility  of  such  a  function  of  viruses  is 
indicated,  especially  in  the  case  of  avian  sarcoma,  there  are  some  difficulties 
also  to  the  application  of  this  theory  in  many  other  cancerous  states.  (3) 
The  theory  that  step-by-step  increases  in  growth  momentum  of  tissues  lead 
to  intermediate  stages  of  sensitization,  and  ultimately  to  irreversible,  can- 
cerous proliferation,  perhaps  through  the  mediation  of  an  autokatalytic 
growth  substance.  This  seems  at  present  the  most  likely  general  explanation 


THE  NATURE  OF  TUMORS  337 

of  the  cancerous  process,  although  we  cannot  rule  out  the  possibility  that  a 
virus  or  virus-like  substance  may  be  a  hidden  cause  of  all  cancers. 

Given  these  fargoing  changes  in  the  reactions  which  normal  tissues  un- 
dergo in  becoming  cancerous,  the  problem  arises  whether  these  remarkable 
changes  at  the  same  time  induce  alterations  in  the  character  of  the  individu- 
ality differentials  of  the  tissues  or  in  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  the 
abnormal  transplants.  To  answer  these  questions,  we  present  in  the  follow- 
ing chapters  the  data  which  are  relevant  in  this  regard. 


Chapter  I 

A  Comparison  between  the  Transplantation 
of  Tumors  and  of  Normal  Tissues 

We  have  analyzed  by  means  of  transplantation  the  organismal  and 
organ  differentials  of  the  normal  tissues,  and  we  shall  now  proceed 
to  the  study  of  the  corresponding  differentials  in  tumors,  which 
latter  differ  in  their  behavior,  after  transplantation,  in  certain  respects  from 
normal  tissues.  In  the  introductory  statement  we  have  discussed  the  essential 
characteristics  of  tumors,  especially  of  cancers,  and  wherein  they  differ  from 
normal  tissues.  We  then  inquired  into  the  factors  which  caused  the  trans- 
formation of  normal  into  cancerous  tissues.  We  shall  now  study  the  various 
types  of  transplantation  of  tumors  and  compare  the  essential  results  with 
those  obtained  after  the  grafting  of  normal  tissues ;  there  are  some  very 
marked  similarities,  as  well  as  some  differences.  In  tumors,  we  shall  find 
certain  complications  which  did  not  occur  in  normal  tissues,  such  as  an  in- 
creased growth  energy,  which  to  some  extent  may  overcome  the  antagonistic 
reactions  of  the  host  to  the  transplant;  also,  there  are  indications  that  the 
tumor  cells  themselves  can  undergo  changes  of  an  adaptive  character  during 
the  course  of  transplantation,  and  that,  in  particular,  they  may  acquire  re- 
sistance to  certain  injurious  conditions  to  which  they  are  exposed  in  the  new 
hosts.  On  the  other  hand,  cancerous  tissues  may  call  forth  in  the  new  hosts, 
states  of  immunity  or  allergic  reactions,  which  tend  to  injure  the  transplant; 
but  there  are  strong  indications  that  against  these  the  cancer  tissue  may  find 
protection  to  some  extent,  by  its  ability  to  absorb  and  to  neutralize  substances 
antagonistic  to  its  growth.  There  exist  in  addition,  the  same  problems  which 
we  had  to  face  also  in  normal  tissues,  namely,  that  of  distinguishing  between 
the  presence  or  lack  of  the  various  organismal  differentials  in  the  tumor  cells, 
and  of  the  manifestation  of  these  differentials,  which  may  depend  on  the 
rapidity  of  the  production  and  discharge  of  the  organismal  differentials  by 
the  transplanted  tumors  or  host,  and  on  the  power  of  resistance  of  the 
tumor  cells  to  the  injurious  effects  of  the  host.  There  is  still  a  further  com- 
plication :  while  in  normal  tissues  we  can  readily  follow  the  reactions  of  the 
host  against  the  transplant  and,  with  certain  precautions,  use  these  reactions 
as  a  standard  with  which  to  gauge  the  differences  in  the  organismal  differ- 
entials between  host  and  graft,  in  the  case  of  tumor  transplants  such  an 
analysis  is  very  difficult  on  account  of  the  relatively  rapid  growth  of  the 
tumor  tissue.  Thus  the  finer  reactions,  which  we  used  as  indicators  in  the 
analysis  of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  especially  of  the  individuality 
differentials,  in  normal  tissues,  cannot  very  well  be  used  in  tumors,  at  least, 
not  in  many  cases.  Instead,  most  investigators  employ  as  the  standard,  the 
growth  or  lack  of  growth  of  the  grafted  tumors.  This  is  a  less  finely  graded 

338 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  339 

method  of  measuring  the  individuality  differentials;  what  is  measured  in 
this  way  is  not  necessarily  the  degree  of  similarity  or  dissimilarity  of  the 
individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  but  the  ability  or  lack  of 
ability  of  the  tumor  to  overcome  a  limiting  factor  for  the  growth  of  the 
transplanted  tumor  tissue  in  a  certain  host.  It  may  be  regarded,  therefore, 
as  doubtful  whether  the  data  obtained  in  tumor  transplantation  can  be  directly 
applied  to  the  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  tumors;  notwith- 
standing these  difficulties,  there  is  much  evidence  that  the  organismal,  and 
in  particular,  the  individuality  differentials,  are  essentially  the  same  in  normal 
tissues  and  in  tumor  tissues,  and  that  the  specific  characteristics  of  cancer 
tissues,  which  differentiate  them  from  normal  tissues,  are  not  so  much  due 
to  changes  in  the  organismal  differentials  as  to  certain  other  conditions. 

As  has  been  said,  in  tumor  transplantation  the  main  concern  is  to  deter- 
mine whether  or  not  a  transplanted  piece  of  tumor  shows  continued  growth, 
and  it  is  customary  to  record  the  percentage  of  successful  transplantations, 
of  "takes,"  as  they  are  obtained  under  various  circumstances.  However,  be- 
sides the  transplantability  there  are  two  other  variable  factors  which  should 
be  considered  in  evaluating  the  result  of  transplantation,  namely,  (1)  the 
growth  energy  of  a  tumor,  by  which  is  meant  the  rapidity  of  its  growth, 
and  (2)  the  latent  period  intervening  between  the  time  of  transplantation 
and  the  first  definite  manifestation  of  an  expansive  growth  of  the  grafted 
piece.  These  data  are  obtained  by  measuring  at  certain  periods  the  diameters 
of  the  tumor,  or  better  still,  by  determining,  in  addition,  its  weight  at  the 
conclusion  of  the  experiment.  In  some  of  our  early  transplantations,  we  gave 
attention,  also,  to  these  last  named  factors.  But  as  mentioned,  only  the  per- 
centage of  "takes"  was  recorded  by  the  majority  of  investigators,  and  the 
lack  of  fineness  of  this  test  was  not  felt  as  a  serious  difficulty,  especially  in 
the  earlier  period  of  tumor  research  in  which  the  peculiar  properties  of 
tumors  were  analyzed  largely  by  means  of  transplantation.  As  a  rule,  the 
growth  of  transplanted  tumors  was  considered  as  something  distinct  from 
the  growth  of  various  normal  tissues.  Only  gradually,  step  by  step,  was  the 
great  similarity  in  the  behavior  of  normal  and  tumor  tissues  after  transplan- 
tation established,  and  at  the  same  time  the  factors  which  differentiate  tumor 
and  tissue  growth  were  analyzed. 

The  first  successful  transplantations  of  tumors  in  animals  were  carried 
out  by  Hanau,  Morau,  Velich,  Eiselsberg  and  Firket.  They  used  for  this 
purpose,  carcinoma  of  rat  and  mouse  as  well  as  sarcoma  of  rat.  These  ex- 
periments established  the  fact  that  certain  tumors  can  be  transplanted  to 
other  animals  of  the  same  species,  at  least  for  a  limited  number  of  genera- 
tions. Incidentally  also,  some  interesting  observations  concerning  the  factors 
on  which  transplantation  depended  were  made,  especially  by  Morau  in  his 
experiments  with  carcinoma  of  the  mammary  gland  in  the  mouse.  A  new 
motive  was  introduced  into  the  experimental  study  of  tumors  in  the  begin- 
ning of  this  century,  in  a  series  of  consecutive  transplantations  of  sarcoma 
of  the  thyroid  gland  of  rats  by  the  writer  (1901)  and  of  a  mammary  gland 
adenocarcinoma  of  the  mouse  by  Jensen  (1902).  In  these  experiments,  which 


340  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

extended  through  many  more  generations  than  previous  ones,  transplanta- 
tion was  used  as  a  method  for  analyzing  the  characteristics  of  the  tumor 
cells  and  the  interaction  between  tumors  and  hosts;  there  was  thus  initiated 
the  subsequent  large  number  of  investigations  into  the  biology  and  causes 
of  cancer,  which  has  continued  with  increasing  intensity  until  the  present 
day  and  which  has  contributed  much  to  the  solution  of  these  problems. 

The  objective  of  the  writer  was  the  study  of  the  characteristics  of  tumor 
cells,  of  the  factors  which  made  them  behave  in  their  own  peculiar  way,  of 
the  possibility  of  separating  a  living  agent  responsible  for  the  tumor  growth 
from  the  transplanted  cells ;  in  addition,  there  was  the  analysis  of  the  causes 
and  mechanism  of  the  transformation  of  normal  into  tumor  cells,  and,  above 
all,  the  comparison  between  the  behavior  of  transplanted  normal  and  can- 
cerous cells,  which  made  possible  a  critical  examination  of  what  we  now  call 
the  organismal  differentials  of  tumors.  Jensen  approached  these  investiga- 
tions primarily  from  the  point  of  view  of  bacteriology  and  immunology,  his 
central  problem  being  the  possibility  of  obtaining  an  active  and  passive  im- 
munity against  tumor  growth,  similar  to  that  which  can  be  obtained  against 
bacteria  and  their  toxins.  In  a  similar  way,  the  subsequent  investigations  of 
Ehrlich  and  Apolant,  Gaylord  and  Clowes,  Bashford  and  Murray  and  their 
collaborators,  and  many  other  well  known  workers,  were  largely  concerned 
with  the  problem  of  immunity,  but  gradually  these  studies  have  led  back 
again  to  a  comparison  between  the  behavior  of  normal  and  tumor  tissues, 
since  it  became  more  and  more  evident  that  some  of  the  most  important 
characteristics  of  tumor  cells  are  shared  with  normal  cells.  Thus,  in  the  end 
both  these  series  of  investigations  contributed  also  to  the  analysis  of  or- 
ganismal differentials  in  general. 

We  shall  now  compare  the  various  types  of  transplantation  of  tumors 
with  those  of  normal  tissues  and  determine  wherein  they  resemble  each  other 
and  wherein  they  differ. 

Auto-  and  Hotnoio  trans  plantation  of  Tumors 

We  have  seen  that  normal  tissues  behave  very  differently  after  auto-  and 
after  homoiotransplantation.  In  the  former,  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  transplant  are  identical,  while  in  the  latter  they  are  different. 
One  of  the  marked  differences  between  normal  tissues  and  tumors  consists 
in  the  fact  that  some  tumors  can  be  homoiotransplanted  from  generation  to 
generation  into  a  percentage  of  animals  of  the  same  species,  which  varies  in 
the  case  of  different  tumors,  whereas,  such  a  serial  homoiogenous  trans- 
plantation does  not  succeed  with  normal  tissues.  But  this  is  not  true  of  the 
majority  of  tumors ;  while  there  are  some  which  can  be  readily  transplanted 
into  animals  belonging  to  the  same  species,  irrespective  of  family  or  strain, 
the  large  majority  grow  only  in  animals  belonging  to  the  same  closely  inbred 
strain,  and  very  much  less  or  not  at  all  in  other  strains;  again,  others  grow 
in  a  certain  percentage  of  mice  from  mixed  strains  of  the  same  country  in 
which  they  had  developed,  but  do  not  grow  in  strains  bred  in  distant  coun- 
tries. To  cite  an  example:  a  carcinoma  of  the  mammary  gland  which  had 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  341 

originated  in  a  white  American  mouse,  and  which  we  used  in  many  of  our 
experiments,  could  be  transplanted  into  the  large  majority  of  American 
white  mice,  but  into  a  much  smaller  percentage  of  German  or  English  mice. 
We  find,  therefore,  all  kinds  of  transitions  between  transplantable  and  non- 
transplantable  tumors.  The  larger  the  number  of  animals  which  are  tested 
for  their  suitability  as  hosts,  the  greater  becomes  the  chance  that  in  the  end 
we  shall  find  an  animal  in  a  mixed  strain  in  which  the  tumor  will  take ;  which 
means  that  the  cells  remaining  alive  after  transplantation  will  continue  to 
multiply.  And  between  this  condition  of  relative  non-transplantability  and  a 
perfect  transplantability  in  100  per  cent  of  all  animals  of  the  same  species, 
we  find  all  intermediate  grades.  However,  the  more  closely  inbred  a  strain 
is,  in  which  a  tumor  originated,  the  larger  becomes  the  number  of  animals 
belonging  to  this  strain  into  which,  as  a  rule,  the  tumor  can  be  successfully 
transplanted,  whereas,  the  tumor  may  not  grow  after  transplantation  into 
other  strains. 

There  are,  in  a  general  way,  two  factors  which  determine  the  degree  of 
transplantability  of  a  tumor,  as  expressed  by  the  average  number  of  takes, 
namely,  (1)  the  relation  of  the  individuality  differential  of  the  host  to  that 
of  the  transplant,  and  (2)  certain  factors  which  differentiate  normal  tissues 
from  tumor  tissues,  and  which  may  vary  quantitatively  in  the  case  of  dif- 
ferent tumors ;  among  these  are  variations  in  growth  energy  and  processes 
of  adaptation,  which  may  take  place  between  tumor  and  host.  In  all  cases 
the  individuality  differentials  in  host  and  transplant  seem  to  assert  them- 
selves, even  in  those  tumors  in  which  the  transplantability  is  100  per  cent, 
for  here,  also,  a  transplanted  tumor  differs  in  its  relation  to  the  host  from 
a  spontaneous  tumor  developing  in  the  same  animal.  We  had  already  noted, 
in  our  earlier  transplantations,  this  difference  between  spontaneous  autog- 
enous tumors  and  transplanted  homoiogenous  tumors.  While  spontaneous 
tumors  have  a  tendency  to  recur  after  extirpation,  transplanted  tumors  are, 
as  a  rule,  more  sharply  separated  from  the  host  tissue  and  can  much  more 
readily  be  completely  removed ;  they  behave  like  strange  organisms  implanted 
in  the  host,  from  which  they  draw  their  nourishment  but  from  which  they 
often  remain  separated  by  a  capsule;  their  vascularization  is  less  adequate, 
and  not  rarely  they  grow  even  more  rapidly  in  the  host  than  do  spontaneous 
autogenous  tumors.  Notwithstanding  such  a  rapid  growth  of  the  homoiog- 
enous tumors,  it  is,  after  all,  a  precarious  existence  which  they  lead  in  the 
strange  host,  as  shown  by  the  fact  that  they  are  usually  more  readily  dam- 
aged by  the  injection  of  certain  unsuitable  substances  into  the  host  than  are 
autogenous  spontaneous  tumors.  These  various  differences  in  the  behavior 
of  spontaneous  and  homoiogenous  transplanted  tumors  are,  perhaps,  partly 
due  to  the  process  of  transplantation  as  such,  but  they  are  largely  caused  by 
the  difference  in  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant;  an  in- 
jurious reaction  against  the  transplant  takes  place  in  the  strange  host,  and 
such  an  injurious  effect  is  the  more  evident  the  greater  the  dissimilarity 
between  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  In  a  general  way, 
it  may  be  stated  that  these  primary  reactions  are  similar  to  those  which  are 


342  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

noted  in  the  case  of  normal  homoiotransplanted  tissues;  but  added  to  these 
primary  reactions  are  secondary  immune  reactions,  which  are  much  less 
evident  in  the  case  of  normal  tissues  than  of  tumors.  However,  at  the  time 
when  these  observations  were  made,  very  closely  inbred  strains  approaching 
homozygosity  were  not  yet  available;  if  transplantations  are  carried  out  in 
such  almost  homozygous  strains,  the  differences  in  the  individuality  differen- 
tials between  host  and  transplant  may  be  much  reduced,  or  almost  entirely 
eliminated,  and  if  there  are  still  some  differences  to  be  found  in  the  behavior 
of  spontaneous  and  transplanted  tumors  under  these  conditions,  these  must 
essentially  be  due  to  changes  which  took  place  in  the  tumor  cells  in  the  course 
of  transplantation.  Also,  normal  tissues  grow  very  much  better  after  trans- 
plantation into  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  inbred  strain  than  into  those 
belonging  to  different  strains,  and  this  fact  again  proves  the  similarity  of 
the  role  of  the  individuality  differentials  in  the  behavior  of  tumors  and  of 
normal  tissues  after  transplantation. 

We  see,  then,  that  even  when  tumors  grow  well  in  homoiogenous  animals, 
differences  which  exist  in  the  constitution  of  analogous  tissues  in  different 
individual  hosts  assert  themselves ;  but  this  fact  was  appreciated  only  after 
it  had  been  shown  that  the  relative  readiness  with  which  auto-  and  homoio- 
transplantation  can  be  carried  out  in  the  case  of  tumors  is  the  same  as  in  the 
case  of  normal  tissues.  The  first  systematic  investigations  concerning  such 
differences  in  the  behavior  of  tumors  after  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation 
were  made  in  1901  and  1902,  when  we  studied  for  this  purpose  a  mammary 
adenoma  of  the  rat,  and  subsequently,  with  S.  Leopold,  a  mixed  tumor  of 
the  breast  in  a  dog.  After  autotransplantation  the  tumors — their  epithelial 
as  well  as  their  connective  tissue  constituents — remained  alive,  while  after 
homoiotransplantation  they  died.  As  to  the  rate  of  growth,  the  autotrans- 
plants  showed  the  slow  rate  of  the  original  tumors;  but  if,  under  the  influ- 
ence of  pregnancy,  the  original  tumor  grew  more  rapidly,  the  autotransplants 
likewise  assumed  a  rapid  growth,  which  ceased  after  the  conclusion  of  preg- 
nancy. We  drew,  then,  the  conclusion  that  the  composition  of  the  body- 
fluids  in  the  individual  in  which  the  tumor  originated  differs  in  some  respects 
from  that  in  other  individuals  of  the  same  species,  and  that  in  the  former  it 
is  much  more  favorable  for  the  life  and  growth  of  transplanted  cells.  This 
conception  we  have  applied  to  tissue  transplantation  in  general  and  as  far  as 
this  conception  holds  good  we  have  considered  tumor  transplantation  merely 
as  a  special  kind  of  tissue  transplantation.  We  would  now  attribute  these 
individual  differences  in  the  composition  of  the  bodyfluids  to  the  primary 
differences  in  the  individuality  differentials  which  are  present  in  the  cells  of 
these  animals,  and  these  cellular  differences  are  associated  with  secondary 
differences  in  the  constitution  of  the  bodyfluids.  From  such  individual  spe- 
cific substances  we  distinguished  growth  substances  of  an  intrinsic  character, 
inherent  in  the  tumor  cells,  and  representing  the  essential  stimulus  to  tumor 
growth,  and  lastly,  extraneous  growth  substances,  especially  certain  hor- 
mones, such  as  those  given  off  by  ovarian  structures,  and  other  similar  sub- 
stances, which  were  able  to  influence  tumor  growth  as  well  as  the  growth 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  343 

of  certain  tissues.  We  concluded  further  that  when  the  intrinsic  factor, 
which  represents  the  essential  stimulus  to  tumor  growth,  is  very  strong, 
then  the  substances  which  determine  to  what  extent  tumor  cells  are  able  to 
live  in  other  individuals — the  individuality  differentials — may  become  less 
important  in  determining  the  fate  of  the  transplanted  tumor.  However,  there 
is  a  limit  as  to  the  differences  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  transplant  if  the  intrinsic  growth  stimuli  shall  be  able  to  assert  them- 
selves. This  would  represent  a  special  instance  of  the  more  general  rule  that 
the  action  of  efficient  growth  stimuli,  or  expressed  differently,  a  strong 
growth  momentum,  may  make  it  possible  for  tissues  to  overcome  conditions 
which  are  unfavorable,  not  only  to  the  growth  but  also  to  the  life  of  these 
tissues. 

Subsequent  experiments  of  others  have  confirmed  these  observations  and 
conclusions.  Thus  Borrel  and  Petit,  Ribbert  and  Mann,  obtained  similar 
results  in  horse,  dog  and  cat,  respectively,  and  Tyzzer,  Apolant  and  Haaland 
found  the  same  differences  between  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation  in 
mammary  carcinoma  of  the  mouse.  While  only  a  relatively  small  number  of 
spontaneous  mouse  carcinomata  can  be  readily  homoiotransplanted,  auto- 
transplantation  almost  always  succeeds.  In  accordance  with  these  concep- 
tions also,  were  the  subsequent  findings  of  Haaland  (1910)  that  inoculation 
of  a  transplantable  tumor  in  a  mouse  did  not  prevent  the  later  development 
of  a  spontaneous  tumor  in  this  animal ;  nor  did  the  growth  of  the  trans- 
plantable tumor  affect  metastasis  formation  or  a  subsequent  autotransplan- 
tation  of  a  spontaneous  autogenous  tumor.  Conversely,  Haaland  observed 
that  the  presence  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  did  not  noticeably  influence  the 
take  or  the  secondary  retrogression  of  a  transplantable  tumor.  Bashford 
interpreted  these  differences  between  the  behavior  of  the  transplantable 
tumors  and  of  spontaneous  tumors  as  an  indication  that  the  conditions  of 
transplantation  differ  from  those  which  determine  the  origin  of  a  spon- 
taneous tumor;  he  did  not  attribute  them  to  differences  in  the  individuality 
differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  While  it  is  true  that  the  conditions  deter- 
mining the  first  origin  of  a  tumor  and  its  transplantability  are  different,  the 
essential  factor  is  that  a  spontaneous  tumor  represents  an  autogenous  tissue, 
possessing  essentially  the  same  individuality  differential  as  the  other  tissues 
of  the  indvidual  in  which  the  tumor  originated,  whereas  the  tumor  trans- 
planted into  another  individual  of  the  same  species  represents  a  homoiog- 
enous  tissue  with  an  individuality  differential  which  differs  to  a  greater 
or  lesser  degree  from  that  of  the  host. 

While  the  growth  of  a  homoiotransplanted  tumor  does  not  need  to  affect 
the  autotransplantation  of  a  spontaneous  tumor,  there  are  some  observations 
which  indicate  that  a  spontaneous  (autogenous)  tumor  may,  under  certain 
conditions,  influence  the  growth  of  a  homoiotransplanted  tumor.  Thus  it 
seems  that  spontaneous  mouse  tumors,  which,  as  we  have  seen,  in  the  ma- 
jority of  cases  are  very  difficult  to  transplant  into  other  individuals,  can 
apparently  be  more  readily  homoiotransplanted  when  the  host  is  also  the 
bearer  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  (Loeb,  1907;  and  Loeb  and  Fleisher,  1913 


344  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  1916).  A  similar  but  more  casual  observation  has  been  made  also  by 
Apolant.  In  recent  experiments  from  our  laboratory,  Blumenthal  confirmed 
this  difference  between  the  transplantability  of  spontaneous  tumors  into 
normal  mice  of  different  strains  and  into  mice  which  are  bearers  of  other 
spontaneous  tumors.  However,  this  condition  was  found  only  if  the  hosts 
were  below  the  age  of  12  months,  while  in  older  mice,  the  growth  of  a 
spontaneous  tumor  did  not  enhance  the  result  of  homoiotransplantation. 

The  importance  of  the  relations  between  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  tumor  was  quite  definite  in  experiments  in  which  we  compared 
the  effects  of  the  extirpation  of  a  spontaneous  autogenous  and  of  a  homoio- 
transplanted  tumor  on  the  growth  of  a  second  homoiogenus  tumor.  In  this 
connection  we  must  first  refer  to  the  important  experiment  of  Uhlenhuth, 
Haendel  and  Steffenhagen,  who  found  that  if  they  inoculated  a  trans- 
plantable rat  tumor  into  a  rat  and  the  transplant  took,  it  was  possible  to 
inoculate  the  same  rat  successfully  with  a  second  homoiogenous  tumor.  But 
if  previous  to  the  second  inoculation  the  first  homoiogenous  tumor  had 
been  extirpated,  the  animal  was  immune  and  the  second  inoculation  was 
unsuccessful.  However,  if  the  extirpation  of  the  first  tumor  had  been  in- 
complete and  the  part  which  had  been  left  behind  grew  again,  then  a  second 
inoculation  with  the  homoiogenous  tumor  was  successful.  These  observa- 
tions were  controverted  by  some  investigators;  especially  by  Russell,  and 
also  by  Woglom.  The  effect  of  the  extirpation  of  the  first  tumor,  if  present 
at  all,  was  attributed  by  these  authors  to  the  non-specific  effects  of  the 
operation,  and  the  immunity  following  the  extirpation  of  the  first  tumor 
was  accordingly  designated  as  an  "operative  immunity".  But,  the  experi- 
ments of  Fleisher  and  the  writer  showed  that  the  observations  of  Uhlenhuth 
and  his  collaborators  were  essentially  correct,  at  least  as  far  as  certain 
types  of  tumors  are  concerned,  among  which  may  be  included  our  trans- 
plantable mouse  carcinoma  IX.  We  found  that  extirpation  of  this  tumor, 
when  growing  in  a  homoiogenous  mouse,  prevented  the  successful  second 
inoculation  with  this  tumor.  Evidently  the  growth  of  the  first  tumor  had  pro- 
duced an  immunity,  which  became  noticeable  only  after  the  first  tumor  had 
been  removed.  Furthermore,  it  could  be  shown  that  if  pieces  of  carcinoma  IX 
were  transplanted,  not  into  a  normal  mouse  but  into  a  mouse  which,  in  ad- 
dition to  a  first  inoculated  tumor,  was  also  the  bearer  of  an  autogenous 
spontaneous  tumor,  the  Uhlenhuth  effect  was  also  readily  demonstrated  as  far 
as  the  influence  of  the  transplanted  tumor  was  concerned;  but  if  we  extir- 
pated instead  of  the  first  homoiogenous  tumor,  the  autogenous  spontaneous 
tumor,  no  immunity  was  conferred  on  the  mouse  against  a  second  inocula- 
tion with  homoiogenous  mouse  carcinoma  IX.  This  proves  that  the  immunity 
conferred  by  the  extirpation  of  the  first  tumor  is  not  a  non-specific  "opera- 
tive immunity",  but  must  be  due  to  a  specific  relation  between  the  individuality 
differentials  of  the  growing  tumor  and  of  the  host.  The  individuality  dif- 
ferential of  the  transplant  differs  from  that  of  the  host  and  of  the  spon- 
taneous autogenous  tumor,  the  autogenous  tumor  and  the  normal  tissues  of 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  345 

the  host  possessing  in  all  probability  the  same  or  almost  the  same  individuality 
differential. 

The  most  probable  interpretation  of  this  experiment  seems  to  be  that  the 
growth  of  the  first  homoiogenous  tumor  causes  the  production  of  an  im- 
mune substance,  injurious  to  the  growth  of  this  tumor.  However,  this  in- 
jurious substance  is,  to  a  large  extent,  absorbed  and  neutralized  by  the  growing 
homoiogenous  tumor  itself.  If  now  this  tumor  is  extirpated,  the  immune  sub- 
stance is  no  longer  neutralized  and  it  is  thus  able  to  prevent  the  growth  of  a 
second  homoiogenous  tumor.  Besides,  this  immune  body  must  carry  a  differen- 
tial able  to  combine  with  the  homoiogenous  differential  of  the  transplanted  tu- 
mors, while  the  tissues  of  the  host  animal,  as  well  as  those  composing  the 
autogenous  tumor,  being  the  bearers  of  an  autogenous  differential,  are  not  able 
to  remove  and  to  neutralize  this  substance.  Substances  which  carry  a  homoiog- 
enous individuality  differential  may  then  induce  in  the  host  immune  re- 
actions antagonistic  to  the  growth  of  homoiogenous  tumors,  but  they  are 
not  absorbed  and  neutralized  by  autogenous  tissues.  It  would  be  of  interest 
to  determine  whether  the  immunity  procured  in  the  Uhlenhuth  phenomenon 
is  a  specific  one,  directed  only  against  a  certain  homoiogenous  tumor,  or 
whether  it  also  protects  against  other  types  which  carry  different  homoiog- 
enous individuality  differentials.  In  accordance  with  this  interpretation 
it  may  then  be  concluded  that  antibodies  are  produced  by  growing  homoiog- 
enous, but  not  by  autogenous  tumors,  and  furthermore,  that  such  antibodies 
are  neutralized  by  homoiogenous  but  not  by  autogenous  tissues ;  but  at  any 
given  time,  the  amount  of  such  antibodies  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  may  be 
too  small  for  direct  demonstration  by  the  ordinary  serological  methods. 

There  is  another  set  of  experimental  data  which  confirms  and  further 
extends  these  conclusions  as  to  the  importance  to  be  attached  to  the  difference 
between  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  differentials.  It  has  been  found  possible 
(Schoene,  Bashford)  to  immunize  mice,  although  only  to  a  limited  extent, 
against  the  growth  of  a  homoiogenous,  transplantable  mammary  carcinoma 
by  a  previous  inoculation  of  normal  tissues,  such  as  erythrocytes,  embry- 
onal material,  liver  and  spleen.  As  a  matter  of  routine,  the  tissue  used  for 
immunization  was  taken  from  other  animals  of  the  same  species.  Woglom 
however,  tested  the  immunizing  power  of  a  piece  of  the  animal's  own  spleen. 
At  first  he  believed  that  the  inoculations  of  such  autogenous  tissue  also  pro- 
duced a  positive  result,  but  the  subsequent  experiments  of  Apolant  and 
Marks,  as  well  as  of  Woglom  himself,  showed  that  neither  the  animal's 
own  spleen  tissue  nor  its  erythrocytes  had  any  demonstrable  immunizing 
action,  while  inoculation  of  the  tissue  of  other  animals  of  the  same  species 
was  effective.  We  may  then  state  that  a  difference  in  individuality  differen- 
tials is  a  prerequisite  for  the  production  of  immunity,  that  it  is  presumably 
the  strange  differential  itself  which  is  concerned  in  this  process  of  immuni- 
zation, and  that  identity  of  organismal  differentials,  in  the  immunizing  ma- 
terial and  in  the  animal  which  is  to  be  immunized,  precludes  an  effective 
immunization ;  this  observation  is  in  harmony  with  the  fact  that  a  transplant 


346  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

possessing  the  same  organismal  differential  as  the  host,  does  not  elicit  an 
antagonistic  reaction ;  it  does  not  act  as  a  stimulus. 

There  are  on  record,  however,  some  observations  which  apparently  do  not 
agree  with  these  conclusions.   (1)   According  to  Murphy,  it  is  possible  to 
influence  the  growth  of  transplanted  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  tumors 
through  the  application  of  a  method  which  affects  the  number  and  activity 
of  lymphocytes  of  the  host;  an  increase  of  the  latter  is  believed  to  initiate 
or  to  intensify  the  mechanism  of  defense  against  the  transplanted  piece  of 
tumor,  while  a  diminution  in  the  number  of  lymphocytes  makes  possible 
the  growth  of  tumors,  which  otherwise  would  not  have  occurred.  But  of 
special  interest  is  the  additional  finding  that  the  change  in  lymphocytes  is 
effective  not  only  against  homoio-  and  heterotumors,  but  also  against  pieces 
of  autotransplanted  tumors.   An  experimentally  produced  increase   in  the 
number  of  lymphocytes  was  found  to  diminish  markedly  the  ability  of  the 
autotransplanted  tumors  to  grow  and  to  develop.  However,  in  this  case  we 
may  have  to  deal  with  a  non-specific  effect  exerted  on  the  tumor  cells  by 
lymphocytes  without  the  intervention  of  organismal  differentials.  (2)  Fibiger 
and  Miller,  in  the  course  of  experiments,  in  which  they  produced  carcinomas 
through  often  repeated  applications  of  tar  to  the  skin  of  mice,  found  in  a 
certain  number  of  instances  that  metastases  of  these  cutaneous  cancers  took 
place  spontaneously  in  the  lung  and  elsewhere.  Now  if  these  animals,  during 
the  period  when  the  tar  was  applied,  were  inoculated  several  times  with 
mouse  embryo-skin,  the  number  of  metastases  was  thereby  diminished.  There 
would  then  be  involved,  in  these  experiments,  apparently  an  effect  of  homoiog- 
enous material  on  autogenous  tissue.  If  these  observations  should  be  correct, 
we  would  have  to  assume  that  also  in  this  case  we  had  to  deal  with  conditions 
of   a  non-specific  nature,   which  affected  unfavorably  the  growth  of   the 
transplant.   In  this  connection  we  may  recall  the  more  recent  findings  of 
Murphy  and  Sturm,  who  showed  that  in  embryo-skin  substances  are  present 
which  inhibit  tumor  growth  and  may  cause  the  regression  even  of  spontaneous 
tumors.   (3)  Lumsden  found  that  when  he  made  repeated  injections  of  the 
euglobulins  from  the  serum  of  sheep,  which  had  been  immunized  against 
either  human,  rat  or  mouse  tumors,  into  or  around  a  spontaneous  mouse 
tumor  and  then  extirpated  the  tumor  and  autotransplanted  a  part  of  it,  the 
autotransplants  did  not  grow  in  the  large  majority  of  cases,  although  homoio- 
transplantation  of  these  tumors  into  other  mice  would  succeed ;  furthermore, 
as  a  rule  the  tumor  did  not  recur  after  excision.  He  attributed  this  result 
to  the  development  of  an  immunity  against  its  own  tumor  in  the  mouse,  and 
believed  that  this  immunity  was  due  to  the  absorption  of  tumor  material.  But, 
this  type  of  imunity  has  apparently  not  yet  been  tested  by  inoculating  one 
of  the  transplantable  tumors  in  such  a  mouse.  In  accordance  with  such  an 
interpretation,  it  would  be  necessary  to  believe  that  there  is  present  in  the 
autogenous  tumor,  in  addition  to  the  organismal  differentials,  still  another 
constituent  which  calls   forth  this   reaction.   This  constituent  might  be  an 
organ  differential  or  it  might  be  a  specific  stimulus  to  tumor  growth,  in  the 
latter    case    an    "antimalignancy"    constituent,    in    the    sense    of    Lumsden. 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  347 

However,  according  to  this  investigator  the  serum  of  rats  immunized  against 
a  rat  tumor  does  not  affect  autogenous  macrophages  of  the  immunized  animal 
or  those  of  another  immunized  rat,  although  it  may  injure  macrophages  of 
the  rat  spleen,  which  are  homoiogenous  in  nature. 

The  analysis  of  the  individuality  differentials  will  be  continued  in  the  next 
chapters,  where  we  shall  further  discuss  immunity  against  tumors  and 
hereditary  factors  as  they  apply  to  tumor  transplantation. 

Transplantation  of  Heterogenous  Tumors  and  the 
Species  Differential 

In  heterotransplantation  of  normal  tissues  we  observed  not  only  survival 
of  the  transplants,  but  also  growth  phenomena  in  some  of  the  tissues,  but 
both  of  these  processes  had  a  very  limited  duration,  and  growth,  if  it  took 
place,  was  much  weaker  than  after  homoiotransplantation  of  the  correspond- 
ing tissues  ;  furthermore,  the  proliferative  processes  ceased  sometime  previous 
to  the  death  of  the  grafts.  We  also  noted  that  different  kinds  of  tissues  showed 
different  degrees  of  resistance  to  the  injurious  action  of  the  primary,  pre- 
formed heterotoxins.  While  more  sensitive  tissues,  such  as  thyroid,  kidney, 
and  also  skin,  were  destroyed  so  rapidly  that  a  pronounced  cellular  (lympho- 
cytic) reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host  tissue  against  the  transplant  could  not 
develop,  or  was  much  diminished  in  intensity,  heterotransplanted  cartilage 
proved  more  resistant,  and  it  lived  long  enough  to  allow  a  very  marked 
connective-tissue  reaction  as  well  as  an  accumulation  of  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  and  lymphocytes  around  the  graft. 

If  instead  of  using  normal  tissues,  we  carry  out  heterotransplantation  of 
tumors,  the  results  are  in  principle  the  same,  although  there  exist  some 
quantitative  differences,  which  are  due  at  least  partly  to  the  greater  prolifera- 
tive momentum  inherent  in  tumors.  In  addition,  the  possibility  must  be  con- 
sidered that  tumors  manifest  a  greater  power  of  adaptation  to  certain  injurious 
conditions  than  normal  tissues,  and,  as  we  have  seen,  they  may  be  able 
to  neutralize,  in  some  way,  substances  which  tend  to  inhibit  their  growth. 

Under  these  circumstances,  it  is  to  be  expected  that  the  range  of  condi- 
tions under  which  tumors  can  grow  should  be  somewhat  wider  than  that  of 
normal  tissues  after  homoiotransplantation  as  well  as  after  heterotransplan- 
tation, though  as  a  rule,  tumors  are  about  as  sensitive  to  heterotoxins  as  are 
normal  tissues.  After  heterotransplantation  of  tumors  there  may  be  a  pre- 
liminary period  during  which  the  growth  may  be  quite  active;  but  soon  it 
ceases,  degenerative  processes  set  in,  and  the  tumors  are  destroyed.  The 
degree  of  growth  and  the  duration  of  this  preliminary  period  depend  upon 
the  inherent  proliferative  momentum  of  the  tumor,  the  sensitiveness  of  the 
tissues  of  which  it  is  composed,  and  the  degree  of  difference  between  the 
species  differentials  of  host  and  of  transplant.  Only  if  the  species  of  donor 
and  host  are  very  nearly  related  may  the  growth  be  more  intense  and  the 
growth  period  of  greater  duration.  Thus  heterotransplantations  between  rats 
and  mice  may  succeed  relatively  well,  temporarily ;  but  the  results  are  much 
more  unfavorable  if  less  nearly  related  species  are  used.  Also,  in  the  case 


348  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  normal  tissues  we  found  that  the  degree  of  species-relationship  between 
host  and  donor  may  influence  to  some  extent  the  result  of  heterotransplanta- 
tion. Furthermore,  especially  those  tumors  which  grow  rapidly  after  homoio- 
transplantation  may  be  expected  to  grow  actively  also  after  heterotransplan- 
tation ;  therefore,  a  rapidly  growing  sarcoma  may  be  especially  well  suited  for 
heterotransplantation.  There  may  perhaps  be  in  addition  some  special  condi- 
tions which  may  enable  cancer  tissues  to  overcome  more  readily  than  normal 
tissues  the  unfavorable  effects  of  heterogenous  transplantation. 

However,  in  general,  the  injurious  effects  which  take  place  in  strange 
species  are  cumulative  and  lead  gradually  to  the  death  of  the  transplant. 
By  re-transplanting  the  tumor  into  an  individual  belonging  to  the  species  in 
which  it  originated,  such  a  cumulative  action  may  be  prevented,  or  at  least 
delayed,  and  the  tumor  given  a  chance  to  recover  to  some  extent  from  the 
injury  received  by  the  hetero toxins.  After  such  a  recovery  has  taken  place,  it 
may  be  possible  to  transplant  the  tumor  again  into  the  strange  species,  and 
this  process  may  be  repeated  a  number  of  times.  Such  a  procedure  was  used 
by  Ehrlich  in  heterotransplantation  of  mouse  tumor  to  rat  and  he  called  it 
zigzag  transplantation.  The  conditions  are  here,  to  a  certain  extent,  com- 
parable to  those  prevailing  after  injuring  the  tumor  by  exposure  to  graded 
degrees  of  heat;  then,  also,  a  recovery  may  take  place  after  transplantation 
into  a  new  host.  But  there  are  indications  that  even  after  transplantation  into 
relatively  nearly  related  species  a  gradual  and  slowly  cumulative  injury  does, 
as  a  rule,  take  place  eventually;  while  after  transplantation  into  more  dis- 
tantly related  species,  as  for  instance,  from  mouse  to  guinea  pig,  a  repeated 
heterotransplantation,  with  intermediate  recovery  periods,  in  the  original 
species  would  in  all  probability  be  impossible. 

However,  it  is  not  only  the  cumulative  action  of  the  preformed  heterotoxins 
which  prevents  the  continued  growth  of  a  tumor  in  a  strange  species,  but  in 
addition,  it  is  the  active  immunity  developing  in  the  host  against  the  heterog- 
enous differential  which  helps  to  injure  and  destroy  the  transplant.  Such  an 
immunity  against  heterogenous  tissues  can  be  elicited  much  more  readily  and 
effectively  than  against  homoiogenous  tissues,  and  when  it  is  well  established, 
the  critical  period  sets  in.  It  might  therefore  be  expected  that  if  the  injurious 
action  of  these  immune  heterotoxins  were  avoided  by  re-transplantation  of 
the  heterogenous  tissue  into  a  new,  not  yet  immunized  individual  of  the 
strange  species,  the  results  might  be  improved,  provided  we  had  to  deal  with 
relatively  resistant  and  rapidly  growing  tumors.  Such  a  condition  apparently 
has  been  realized  in  more  recent  experiments  by  Ito  in  transplantation  into 
rats  of  a  squamous  cell  tar  carcinoma  experimentally  produced  in  a  mouse. 
This  mouse  carcinoma  could  be  transplanted  for  many  generations  into  rats 
if  a  re-transplantation  into  a  new  host  was  carried  out  every  five  or  six  days. 
But  if  the  transplant  was  allowed  to  remain  as  long  as  ten  days  in  the 
heterogenous  host,  it  became  entirely  necrotic.  It  must  be  assumed  either  that 
an  increased  growth  momentum,  acquired  during  their  transformation  into 
cancer,  made  it  possible  for  these  cells  to  overcome  the  injurious  action  of 
the  natural  heterotoxins  better  than  normal  tissues,  or  that  a  diminished  sensi- 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  349 

tiveness  to  these  substances,  or  a  greater  power  to  absorb  and  neutralize  them 
was  responsible  for  the  increased  resistance.  That  these  tar  cancer  cells,  how- 
ever, still  possessed  the  species  differential  of  the  mouse  is  indicated  by  the 
fact  that  it  was  possible  to  elicit  an  active  immunity  against  them  by  a  previous 
immunization  of  a  rat  with  mouse  liver  serving  as  an  antigen.  But  the  best 
known  experiments  of  this  kind  are  those  of  Putnoky,  who  has  been  able 
to  propagate  an  Ehrlich  mouse  carcinoma  continuously  in  rats  since  1929 
by  re-transplanting  it  every  ten  days.  This  mouse  tumor  grew  very  rapidly  in 
rats  for  from  ten  to  fourteen  days,  during  which  time  many  rats  were  killed 
by  its  growth.  Following  this  period,  necrosis  and  death  of  the  tumor  set  in  in 
animals  which  survived.  In  other  series  of  heterotransplantations,  various 
investigators  have  succeeded  in  keeping  mouse  tumors  alive  in  rats  and  in 
inducing  temporary  growth,  but  invariably  the  growth  energy  has  decreased 
after  a  number  of  successive  rat  to  rat  transplantations  and  then  the  tumors 
died  out,  although  after  re-transplantation  to  the  mouse,  if  the  tumor  had  not 
been  too  seriously  injured,  it  could  be  propagated  indefinitely. 

Why  is  it  that  in  these  few  instances  it  has  been  possible  to  propagate 
indefinitely,  under  the  conditions  mentioned,  the  mouse  tumor  in  rats?  Pre- 
sumably the  various  factors  enumerated  above  were  responsible  for  its 
successful  development  in  heterogenous  hosts.  The  tumor  chosen  by  Putnoky, 
being  a  very  rapidly  growing  one,  the  growth  momentum  of  the  cells  could 
overcome  injurious  conditions  up  to  a  certain  limit.  This  marked  growth 
intensity  found  a  morphological  expression  in  the  small  amount  of  stroma 
present  in  this  carcinoma.  It  was  to  be  expected  that  such  a  rapidly  growing 
tumor  would  be  able  to  absorb  and  neutralize  a  larger  quantity  of  either 
natural  or  immune  heterotoxins  than  would  a  slowly  growing  tumor.  Addi- 
tional factors  to  be  considered  in  these  heterogenous  tumor  growths  are  the 
greater  power  of  resistance  of  the  tumor  cells  and,  furthermore,  the  strain  of 
rats  into  which  the  transplantations  are  made.  Putnoky  found  that  the  constant 
propagation  of  the  Ehrlich  mouse  carcinoma  in  rats  succeeded  only  if  a  Hun- 
garian strain  of  rats  was  used ;  in  English  rats  the  tumor  regressed  spontane- 
ously after  about  ten  or  fourteen  days.  This  explains  why  several  other  investi- 
gators, who  used  other  than  Hungarian  strains  of  rats,  were  unable  to  obtain 
equally  favorable  results.  However,  more  recently  de  Baloghi  succeeded  in 
repeating  Putnoky's  experiments  with  another  strain  of  Ehrlich  mouse  carci- 
noma. This  tumor  behaved  biologically  and  structurally  in  a  similar  way  to 
Putnoky's  tumor;  but  de  Baloghi  obtained  long-continued  heterogenous 
growth  in  diverse  races  of  white  and  gray  rats.  The  favorable  results  noted 
in  these  experiments  were  therefore  not  primarily  due  to  racial  factors  in  the 
host,  but  apparently  to  the  selection  of  the  most  vigorous  tumors  possessing 
a  great  growth  momentum. 

There  remains  the  question  as  to  whether  the  differences  in  the  growth 
of  different  mouse  tumors  in  the  rat  are  due  to  a  change  in  the  genetic  con- 
stitution of  these  tumors,  implying  a  difference  in  their  organismal  (species) 
differentials.  There  is  no  definite  reason  for  assuming  such  a  change.  These 
rat  tumors  can  readily  be  re-transplanted  into  mice,  where  they  grow  in  the 


350  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

usual  active  way  without  undergoing  regression.  This  conclusion  is  also  con- 
firmed by  the  fact  that  regression  of  a  Walker  rat  carcinoma  or  a  Jensen  rat 
sarcoma  did  not  cause  immunity  against  the  growth  of  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky 
tumor.  If  the  carcinomatous  cells  had  assumed,  at  least  partly,  the  species 
differential  of  the  rat,  the  immunity  against  the  growth  of  a  rat  tumor  caused 
by  the  previous  retrogression  of  a  rat  tumor  in  rats  should  have  affected  also 
the  Putnoky  tumor.  On  the  other  hand,  the  growth  of  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky 
rat-strain  tumor  in  rats  can  be  prevented  by  previous  inoculation  of  mouse 
embryo-skin  into  the  rats.  This  again  indicates  that  the  tumor  cells  still  pos- 
sessed the  species  differential  of  the  mouse.  If  inoculation  of  mouse  embryo- 
skin  induces  only  a  slight  retardation  of  the  growth  of  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky 
tumor  in  the  mouse,  this  is  presumably  due  to  the  very  strong  growth  mo- 
mentum which  this  tumor  possesses  in  mice.  In  a  similar  way,  Purdy  found 
in  heterotransplantation  of  fowl  tumors  into  ducks,  ducks  were  made  immune 
to  the  fowl  tumors  by  a  previous  implantation  of  chick  embryo,  but  not  of 
duck  embryo. 

However,  there  is  one  observation  which  might  suggest  that  an  actual 
change  in  the  species  differential  of  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky  tumor  growing  in 
rats  has  taken  place.  After  regression  of  such  a  rat-propagated  tumor  in  rats, 
the  latter  have  acquired  an  active  immunity  against  the  growth  of  subsequently 
inoculated  Walker  and  Jensen  rat  tumors ;  rat-propagated  Putnoky  tumors 
are  more  effective  in  this  respect  than  are  Ehrlich  mouse-strain  carcinomas. 
But  this  difference  may  perhaps  be  due  to  the  fact  that  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky 
rat-strain  tumors  grow  much  more  vigorously  in  rats  than  do  mouse-strain 
tumors ;  they  may  therefore  be  expected  to  induce  a  higher  degree  of  im- 
munity. While  there  is  no  reason  for  assuming  that  the  genetic  constitution 
of  the  mouse  carcinoma  cells  has  been  transformed  into  the  genetic  constitu- 
tion of  the  rat,  or  that  the  better  growth  of  these  cells  in  the  rat  was  made  pos- 
sible through  a  gene  mutation  or  chromosomal  change  in  these  somatic  cells, 
still  it  is  possible  that  certain  adaptive  changes  have  gradually  taken  place  in 
the  Ehrlich-Putnoky  tumors,  which  make  them  more  able  to  overcome  the 
injurious  conditions  existing  in  the  rat  after  long-continued  propagation  in 
this  strange  species.  Also,  in  other  series  of  heterotransplantations,  adaptive 
changes  of  this  kind  seem  to  have  occurred.  These  may  consist  in  a  gradually 
increasing  growth  energy  of  the  tumors  in  the  rat,  or  in  an  increasing  resist- 
ance to  the  injurious  rat  substances,  perhaps  caused  by  a  more  active  absorp- 
tion and  neutralization  of  such  substances  by  the  growing  tumor  cells.  That 
such  an  adaptation  may  take  place  after  heterotransplantation  is  indicated, 
also,  by  the  fact  that  at  first  the  temporary  growth  of  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky 
mouse  tumor  was  accomplished  only  in  very  young  rats,  in  which  the  reac- 
tion against  strange  differentials  is  less  marked  than  in  adult  animals,  and 
that  only  in  the  course  of  continued  transplantations  in  the  rat  did  the  tumor 
begin  to  grow  well,  at  least  for  some  time,  also  in  young  adult  rats.  In  addi- 
tion to  these  adaptive  changes,  it  is  conceivable  that  in  the  course  of  continued 
re-transplantations  into  rats  those  metabolic  cell  activities  which  lead  to  the 
production  of  the  organismal  differential,  and  which  in  the  last  analysis 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  351 

depend  upon  the  genetic  constitution,  may  perhaps  have  been  slightly  modified, 
and  that  such  a  modification  may  have  facilitated  the  growth  of  the  mouse 
tumor  in  the  rat ;  but  we  do  not  possess  any  definite  knowledge  as  to  wherein 
such  adaptive  processes  consist. 

There  can  be  little  doubt  that  even  under  the  most  favorable  conditions  a 
heterotransplantation  of  a  mouse  tumor  into  rats,  which  would  lead  to  a 
permanent  growth  in  the  latter,  cannot  be  accomplished.  There  remains  a 
difference  between  the  growth  of  these  tumors  in  the  rat  and  in  the  mouse, 
and  there  also  remains  a  difference  between  the  growth  of  rat-adapted  mouse 
tumors  and  real  rat  tumors  in  the  rat.  It  is  therefore  not  possible  to  conclude 
that  a  heterotransplantation  has  been  fully  successful  in  these  experiments. 
Furthermore,  we  must  not  identify  mouse-to-rat  transplantation  with  hetero- 
transplantation in  general.  There  can  be  no  doubt  that  transplantation  of 
mouse  tumors  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue  or  into  the  peritoneal  cavity  of 
farther  distant  species  would  have  a  much  more  unfavorable  outcome  and  that 
such  tumors  would  undergo  rapid  necrosis. 

While  the  data  concerning  the  degree  to  which  transplantation  of  tumors 
from  mouse  to  rat  is  possible  may  be  considered  as  well  established,  and 
while  these  data  are  not  in  conflict  with  the  conclusion  that  the  concept  of 
organismal  differentials  applies  also  to  the  transplantation  of  tumors,  there 
have  been  recorded,  from  time  to  time,  observations  which  make  it  appear 
that  cancers  can  be  successfully  transferred  also  into  widely  distant  species. 
If  this  were  a  fact,  it  would  be  contradictory  to  what  is  known  about  the 
significance  of  organismal  differentials  in  determining  the  fate  of  transplants. 
Thus  it  has  been  stated  that  human  tumors  can  be  transplanted  to  dog,  rabbit 
or  rat;  however,  should  a  tumor  develop  in  the  new  host  following  such  a 
transplantation,  there  is  the  possibility  that  it  may  have  been  a  spontaneous 
growth ;  it  is  very  improbable  that  the  growth  was  derived  from  the  heteorog- 
enous  cells.  In  the  case  reported  by  C.  Lewin  many  years  ago,  the  transplant- 
able tumor,  which  formed  in  the  rat  following  transplantation  of  pieces  of 
human  cancer,  was  of  a  very  low  degree  of  specificity  and  was  apparently 
constituted  of  cells  which  usually  take  a  prominent  part  in  inflammatory 
reactions. 

In  heterotransplantations  of  normal  tissues  we  have  seen  that  the  toxic 
action  of  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  is  much  more  evident  in  the  destruction 
of  the  transplant  than  in  homoiotransplantations.  Although  in  the  latter  the 
toxicity  of  the  bodyfluids  does  injure  the  transplant,  the  cellular  and  vascular 
reactions  of  the  host  are,  here,  relatively  more  important.  Likewise,  hetero- 
transplanted  tumors  are  primarily  injured  by  the  heterotoxins  of  the  body- 
fluids  of  the  host,  although  cellular  reactions  may  secondarily  participate  in 
the  destruction  of  the  graft. 

Since,  after  homoiotransplantation  of  a  tumor,  even  in  an  animal  im- 
munized against  it,  it  is  usually  the  central  part  of  the  graft  which  dies  first, 
while  after  heterotransplantation  in  an  immunized  animal  the  peripheral,  as 
well  as  the  central,  part  shows  signs  of  injury,  it  has  been  assumed  that  im- 
mune substances  exert  their  injurious  action  only  on  heterotransplants,  and 


352  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

not  on  homoiotransplants.  However,  the  primary  degeneration  of  the  more 
central  parts  of  a  homoiotransplant  is  due  to  the  more  unfavorable  condition 
of  these  areas,  involving  a  deficiency  of  oxygen  and  possibly  also  of  other 
foodstuffs  during  the  period  directly  following  transplantation;  the  central 
portions  of  the  tumor  may  therefore  be  more  accessible  to  the  action  of  the 
injurious  homoiotoxins,  while  in  the  peripheral  parts  these  toxins  are  not 
strong  enough  to  destroy  tissues  which  live  under  relatively  favorable  condi- 
tions. On  the  other  hand,  the  more  active  heterotoxins,  especially  the  immune 
heterotoxins,  may  accomplish  a  direct  injury  also  of  the  peripheral  parts. 

The  reaction  against  homoiogenous  tumor  transplants  depends,  at  least  in 
part,  on  the  development  of  an  active  acquired  immunity  in  the  host ;  whereas, 
in  the  case  of  normal  homoiogenous  tissue  transplants,  the  injurious  effect 
seems  to  be  due  largely  to  the  action  of  primary  homoiotoxins  and  to  the 
direct  response  on  the  part  of  the  host  tissues.  Similarly,  while  in  the  case 
of  heterotransplanted  normal  tissues  the  preformed  heterotoxins  and  the 
activity  of  the  cells  of  the  host  play  the  principal  role,  and  immune  hetero- 
toxins seem  to  enter  into  the  reaction  only  secondarily,  in  the  case  of  hetero- 
transplanted tumors  the  effect  of  active  immunization  can  be  more  readily 
demonstrated.  Through  a  previous  inoculation  with  normal  tissues  from 
the  heterogenous  species  to  which  the  tumor  belongs,  immunization  of  the 
host  can  be  accomplished  and  the  destruction  of  the  tumor  transplant  can 
be  much  accelerated.  While  under  these  circumstances  the  action  of  the  im- 
mune heterotoxins  is  the  most  important  agency  that  causes  the  rapid  destruc- 
tion of  the  transplant,  an  intensified  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  lymphocytes 
may  play  a  part  here,  as  well  as  after  homoiotransplantation  of  tumors  into 
actively  immunized  animals ;  it  is  by  means  of  this  accumulation  of  cells 
around  the  graft,  rather  than  by  a  lack  of  ingrowth  of  connective  tissue  and 
blood  vessels  from  the  host  into  the  transplant,  that  the  incompatibility 
between  the  differentials  of  the  host  and  transplant  may  become  manifest. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  in  the  case  of  tumors,  as  well  as  of  normal 
tissues,  it  is  primarily  the  primary,  performed  heterodifferentials  which  call 
forth  the  reaction  of  he  host  tissue  against  the  transplant,  and  that  it  is  these 
heterotoxins  which  injure  the  transplanted  tumor.  Secondarily,  such  hetero- 
differentials may  act  as  antigens  and  call  forth  the  production  of  immune 
heterotoxins,  which  are  especially  effective  in  the  case  of  tumor  transplants; 
associated  with  this  process  may  be  an  intensification  of  the  cellular  reaction. 
Tumors  are  the  descendents  of  normal  tissues;  they  have  retained  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials  of  the  latter  in  all  essential  respects  ,and  they  call  forth, 
therefore,  the  same  primary  reaction  in  the  hosts.  But  some  changes  take 
place  in  the  normal  tissues  during  their  transformation  into  tumors  and  it  is 
in  consequence  of  these  changes  that  tumor  tissues  differ  in  certain  respects 
from  normal  tissues  in  their  transplantability  and  in  the  reactions  they  call 
forth  in  the  host. 

That,  however,  notwithstanding  these  modifications  the  organismal  differ- 
entials of  the  tumors  play  a  significant  role  in  transplantation,  is  also  made 
evident  by  the  fact  that  in  order  to  accomplish  an  immunization  against  a 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  353 

heterogenous  tumor,  one  must  use  heterogenous  tissue  of  the  same  species  as 
that  in  which  the  tumor  originated.  For  instance,  if  one  wishes  to  immunize 
a  rat  against  a  mouse  carcinoma,  the  rat  must  be  inoculated  with  normal 
mouse  tissue,  and  such  an  immunization  cannot  be  accomplished  by  inoculating 
rat  or  guinea  pig  tissues  into  the  rat.  Correspondingly,  an  immunity  against 
a  homoiogenous  tumor  can  be  attained  only  by  the  inoculation  of  tissues 
from  the  same  species :  a  mouse  can  be  actively  immunized  against  a  mouse 
tumor  only  by  means  of  mouse  tissues.  Now  we  know  that  in  the  tissues  used 
for  heteroimmunization  there  are  present  in  addition  to  the  heterodifferentials, 
homoiodifferentials ;  but  evidently  the  presence  of  the  heterogenous  differen- 
tials in  some  way  prevents  the  homoiodifferentials  from  becoming  effective  un- 
der these  conditions.  We  see,  then,  that  the  organismal  differentials  play  a  role 
in  immunization  against  heterogenous  as  well  as  against  homoiogenous  tumors. 

The  direct  action  of  heterotoxins,  and  especially  of  immune  heterotoxins — 
but  not  of  homoiotoxins — on  tumor  tissue,  can  also  be  demonstrated  in  tissue 
culture.  While,  as  Lambert  and  Hanes  have  found,  rat  sarcoma  grows  in 
vitro  as  vigorously  in  plasma  from  immune  rats  as  in  the  plasma  from  normal 
or  tumor-bearing,  non-immunized  rats,  the  immune  heterogenous  serum  from 
guinea  pigs  immunized  against  rat  sarcoma  has  a  toxic  action  on  this  tumor 
in  tissue  culture.  It  also  exerts  such  an  effect  on  rat-embryo  skin.  Other 
authors,  such  as  Gussio,  Mottram  and  Rous,  likewise  were  unable  to  demon- 
strate the  injurious  action  of  homoiotoxins  in  tissue  culture.  Furthermore, 
Rous,  and  subsequently  Kross,  did  not  succeed  in  demonstrating  the  existence 
of  homoiotoxins  by  means  of  parabiosis,  in  which  substances  produced  in 
one  animal  are  supposed  to  be  transferred  directly  to  the  circulation  and  thus 
to  the  tissues  of  its  partner.  However,  as  shown  in  a  previous  chapter,  factors 
which  complicate  parabiosis  and  tissue  culture  make  it  necessary  to  accept 
negative  results  obtained  by  means  of  these  methods  with  certain  reservations. 
In  the  case  of  chicken  sarcoma  growing  in  vitro,  A.  Fischer  found  that  not 
only  plasma  from  naturally  resistant  fowl  was  without  any  inhibiting  effect, 
but  even  the  serum  of  geese,  ducks  and  rabbits  immunized  with  chicken 
sarcoma  did  not  prevent  the  proliferation  of  this  tissue  in  vitro.  However, 
the  lack  of  effects  of  homoiotoxins  in  tissue  cultures  may,  at  least  partly,  be 
due  to  the  fact  that  while  in  the  living  vertebrate  organism  the  bodyfluids  are 
constantly  circulating  and  new  substances  of  a  specific  character  are  carried 
to  the  transplanted  tissue,  in  vitro  the  amount  of  such  an  injurious  substance 
which  is  able  to  act  on  the  tissue  is  very  limited,  and  the  tissue  can  presumably 
neutralize  it  to  some  extent;  the  results  obtained  in  vitro  are,  therefore,  not 
comparable  in  every  respect  to  those  obtained  in  the  living  animal. 

In  a  preceding  part  it  could  be  shown  that  the  homoiotoxins  in  the  blood 
stream  of  a  homoiogenous  animal  may  injure  directly  the  transplanted  normal 
cells.  This  is  more  noticeable  in  some  species  than  in  others,  and  especially  it 
is  noticeable  if  the  difference  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host 
and  graft  is  relatively  great  and  if  the  transplanted  tissue  is  sensitive.  There 
are  indications  that  immune  substances  may  be  formed  as  a  result  of  a  first 
transplantation,   which   cause   an   acceleration   of   the   reaction  against   the 


354  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

transplanted  tissues.  More  marked  than  the  injurious  effect  of  the  homoio- 
toxins  is  that  of  heterogenous  bodyfluids,  containing  heterotoxins,  on  trans- 
planted tissues;  these  heterotoxins  damage  all  transplanted  tissues  without 
the  cooperation  of  host  cells.  The  action  of  sera  on  tumor  cells  has  been 
studied  particularly  by  Lumsden  and  his  coworkers.  They  distinguish:  (1) 
homoiotoxins  which  develop,  for  instance,  in  a  rat  after  immunization  with 
Jensen  rat  sarcoma  and  rat  spleen.  They  injure  cancer  and  normal  wandering 
cells  from  the  same  species  in  tissue  culture,  but  not  other  kinds  of  normal 
tissue  cells.  These  substances  are  heat-labile  and  are  contained  in  the  euglobu- 
lin  fraction  of  the  serum;  (2)  normal  heterotoxins  which  are  injurious  for 
cells  of  all  other  species.  They  are  very  heat-labile  and  are  also  contained  in 
the  euglobulin  fraction ;  they  can  be  increased  in  quantity  through  immuniza- 
tion;  (3)   immune  heterotoxins  which  are  directed  specifically  against  the 
species  which  has  been  used  for  immunization.  These  are  stable,  heat-resistant, 
and  are  contained  in  the  pseudoglobulin  fraction;  (4)  and  possibly  in  addition 
to  the  species-specific  antibodies,  tissue-  or  organ-specific  immune  substances. 
Lumsden  believes  that  there  is  evidence  as  well  that  "anti-malignant"  immune 
substances  develop  in  response  to  inoculation  of  cancer  tissue  into  animals 
of  the  same  species  in  which  the  cancer  originated,  for  instances,  in  response 
to  inoculation  of  the  Jensen  rat  sarcoma  into  rats.  These  sera  would  act  not 
only  on  the  kind  of  cancer  which  was  used  for  immunization,  but  also  on 
various  other  types  of   cancer,  irrespective  of   the  species   in  which  they 
originated.  However,  other  investigators   (Phelps)   find  that  such  sera  are 
not  specific  for  cancer  cells,  but  contain  heterotoxins  which  act  equally  well 
on  normal  cells  of  the  species  to  which  the  antigen  belonged.  Lumsden, 
Macrea  and  Skipper  themselves  noted  that  such  "anti-malignancy"  sera  kill 
also  young,  not  as  yet  much  differentiated  macrophages  emerging  from  spleen 
cultures;  however,  these  sera  do  not  affect  the  macrophages  of  the  producer 
of  the  antiserum.  This  is  presumably  due  to  the  fact  that  in  the  latter  case  we 
have  to  deal  with  autogenous  cells,  while  the  ordinary  "anti-malignancy" 
sera  act  either  on  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  cells.  At  present  it  appears 
doubtful  whether  such  anticancer  sera  exist.  However,  it  is  very  probable 
that  heterogenous,  and  also  homoiogenous  cancer  growth  in  an  animal  may 
call  forth  the  production  of  immune  substances  much  more  actively  than  do 
normal  adult  tissues;  but  strange  embryonal  tissues  likewise  produce  im- 
munity, and  it  is  very  probable  that  the  more  active  growth  of  cancerous 
tissue  as  compared  with  inoculated  adult  normal  tissue  is  at  least  one  of  the 
factors  that  is  responsible  for  the  difference  in  the  effectiveness  of  these 
various  tissues  serving  as  antigens. 

By  a  different  method  Woglom  attempted  to  prove  the  existence  of  im- 
mune substances  in  the  serum  of  rats  inoculated  with  rat  sarcoma  39,  after 
the  spontaneous  retrogression  of  these  tumors.  He  absorbed  the  immune 
substances  which  were  present  in  the  blood  of  these  rats  by  means  of  a 
mash  of  sarcoma  39.  After  subsequent  extraction  of  the  immune  substances 
from  the  sarcoma  mash  with  Locke  solution,  this  extract  inhibited  the  growth 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  355 

of  a  sarcoma  emulsion  on  which  it  had  acted  for  a  few  hours.  Similar  extract, 
in  which  serum  of  normal  rats  had  been  used,  was  ineffective. 

The  experiments  of  Lumsden  are  in  accordance  with  the  conclusions  at 
which  we  arrived  in  our  experiments  with  normal  tissues,  namely,  that 
primary  (natural  or  preformed)  heterotoxins  in  the  host  exert  a  direct 
injurious  effect  on  the  transplant;  the  presence  of  the  heterodifferential  in 
the  transplanted  tissues  is  responsible  for  the  accumulation  of  lymphocytes 
and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  and  for  the  marked  development  of  fibrous 
tissue  around  the  graft.  Various  observations  have  made  it  probable  that 
secondarily  there  is  superimposed  upon  the  natural  preformed  heterotoxin, 
a  secondary  immune  heterotoxin,  which  is  especially  readily  demonstrable 
in  the  case  of  tumor  grafts.  There  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  hetero- 
differentials  may  act  as  antigens,  which  lead  to  the  production  of  the  immune 
heterotoxins. 

Experiments  in  heterotransplantation  into  related  species  have  been  carried 
out,  not  only  with  mammalian  tumors,  but  also  with  certain  of  the  filterable 
chicken  sarcomata  and  related  fowl  tumors  which  can  be  transmitted  to  other 
birds  by  the  inoculation  of  tumor  cells  as  well  as  by  means  of  an  agent 
separable  from  cells.  Fujinami  transferred -his  chicken  myxosarcoma  to  ducks 
and  propagated  it  here  serially  through  forty  generations.  Gye,  by  means  of 
filtrates  or  of  cell  suspensions,  could  transmit  the  same  tumor  serially  to 
ducklings,  but  in  half-grown  or  adult  ducks  the  tumor  could  grow  only  for 
some  time  and  it  later  regressed.  But  Purdy  succeeded  in  transmitting  it 
serially  to  ducklings  as  well  as  to  adult  ducks  by  injecting  very  large  amounts 
of  minced  tumor  tissue.  There  is  some  reason  for  believing  that  the  chicken 
tumor  cells,  as  such,  were  able  to  grow  in  the  heterogenous  host,  because  it 
has  been  found  possible  to  elicit  a  certain  degree  of  immunity  against  the 
fowl  tumor  by  a  previous  injection  of  minced  fowl-embryo  into  the  ducklings. 
It  is  of  interest  that  a  chick  in  which  a  Fujinami  tumor  happened  to  regress, 
had  thereby  acquired  an  immunity  against  a  Fujinami  sarcoma  but  not 
against  a  Rous  tumor. 

As  to  the  heterogenous  transfer  of  Rous  chicken  sarcoma,  Purdy  was  not 
able  to  accomplish  this  in  adult  ducks  by  injection  of  large  amounts  of  virus- 
containing  extracts,  but  by  transmitting  large  quantities  of  minced  tumor 
tissue  he  could  transfer  Rous  sarcoma  through  several  generations  of  very 
young  ducklings  ;  he  was  unsuccessful  in  similar  experiments  with  adult  ducks. 
Des  Ligneris  likewise  had  negative  results  when  he  used  adult  ducks  and  also 
geese,  but  he  succeeded  in  transferring  the  tumor  to  turkeys  and  guinea  fowls. 
Not  all  such  chicken  tumors,  however,  can  be  transferred  into  foreign  species ; 
growth  did  not  take  place  with  Begg's  endothelioma.  If  it  is  then  probable 
that  at  least  in  some  of  these  instances  we  have  actually  to  deal  with  a  success- 
ful transplantation  of  tumor  cells  into  heterogenous  hosts,  we  must  not  lose 
sight  of  the  fact  that  host  and  donor  belonged  to  relatively  nearly  related 
species,  and  furthermore,  that  it  is  not  ordinary  tissue  cells  which  developed, 
but  cells  stimulated  to  grow  by  an  agent  which  has  invaded  them ;  moreover, 


356  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

it  is  of  importance  to  note  in  this  connection  that  cells  of  a  less  differentiated 
nature  composed  these  tumors.  Moreover,  different  types  of  fowl  tumors 
differed  in  their  ability  to  grow  in  heterogenous  hosts  and,  likewise,  different 
races  of  certain  avian  species  differed  in  their  suitability  as  hosts.  The  transfer 
of  the  tumor  by  large  amounts  of  tumor  cells  was,  on  the  whole,  more  suc- 
cessful than  the  transfer  by  means  of  virus-containing  tumor  extracts.  In 
general,  fowl  sarcoma  could  be  transmitted  much  more  readily  to  newly 
hatched  heterogenous  birds  than  to  somewhat  older  ones. 

According  to  the  quite  recent  experiments  of  Duran-Reynals  it  can  be 
shown  that  if  we  transfer  Rous  fowl  sarcoma  I  to  ducklings,  at  first  the  un- 
changed chicken  tumor  virus  or  cells  cause  the  tumor  development  in  these 
ducklings,  as  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the  tumors  thus  produced  have  not 
only  the  same  morphological  characteristics  as  the  original  chicken  tumor,  but 
they  also  possess  the  same  tissue  affinities  and  the  same  tendency  to  develop 
in  certain  regions  of  the  host.  However,  after  the  tumors  have  lived  for  some 
time  in  ducklings,  they  may  change  their  characteristics,  the  chicken-adapted 
virus  becoming  duck-adapted  virus;  it  tends  to  cause  sarcomas  in  organs, 
different  from  those  in  which  it  grew  at  first,  growing  now  in  bones  or 
lymph  glands,  calling  forth  a  lymphosarcoma  in  the  latter  organ.  Further- 
more, this  changed  tumor  tends  to  become  generalized.  A  similar  adaptation 
seems  to  occur  if  tumor  cells  are  inoculated ;  these  also  cause  the  same  kind  of 
tumors  as  the  duck-adapted  virus.  Such  a  duck-adapted  virus  or  cell  suspen- 
sion induced  not  only  tumor  formation  in  ducklings,  but  also  in  adult  ducks. 
Cells  and  viruses  are  now  no  longer  heterogenous  but  homoiogenous  elements 
for  the  duck.  If  such  duck-adapted  virus  or  cells  suspension  is  transferred 
back  into  chicken,  it  seems  at  first  to  behave  like  material  heterogenous  for  the 
chicken,  but  after  some  time,  the  duck-adapted  virus  or  cell  suspension  can 
again  become  chicken-adapted,  being  thus  converted  into  a  homoiogenous 
virus  for  the  chicken.  However,  it  should  not  be  concluded  from  these  ex- 
periments that  a  chicken  cell  was  actually  transformed  into  a  duck  cell,  but  it 
seems,  merely,  that  the  changed  virus  altered  secondarily  the  tumor-producing 
characteristics  of  the  chicken  cells  in  which  the  virus  lived. 

We  have  seen  that  it  is  possible  to  a  certain  extent  to  protect  transplanted 
normal  tissues  against  the  injurious  reactions  which  ordinarily  take  place  in 
the  host,  and  by  various  means  to  diminish  the  reactions  in  the  host  which 
follow  as  a  rule  transplantation  of  strange  tissues.  Thus  homoiotransplants 
induced  less  active  reactions  when  younger  hosts  were  used ;  also  when  they 
were  made  into  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  into  the  brain,  or  after  pre- 
ceding injections  of  trypan  blue.  More  striking  differences  have  been  observed 
when  similar  methods  were  employed  in  the  case  of  transplanted  tumors,  and, 
indeed,  experiments  with  tumor  transplants  preceded  experiments  of  a  like 
nature  with  normal  tissues.  It  has  been  found  by  Murphy  that  transplanted 
heterogenous  tumors,  even  if  host  and  tumor  were  phylogenetically  far  distant, 
grew  for  some  time  on  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  of  the  chick;  an  ex- 
periment with  heterogenous  embryonal  tissue  also  succeeded;  but  as  soon  as 
the  development  of  the  chick  embryo  had  reached  the  stage  at  which  the 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  357 

spleen  and  other  organs  were  fully  differentiated,  the  growth  ceased  and  the 
transplant  died.  From  more  recent  experiments,  it  appears  that  not  only  the 
allantoic  membrane,  but  also  the  yolk-sac  of  the  chick  embryo,  is  suitable  for 
the  growth  of  the  heterogenous  tumors  (Taylor,  Thacker  and  Pennington). 
Shirai  and  Murphy  noted  a  better  growth  of  heterogenous  tumors  in  the 
brain  than  in  the  subcutaneous  tissue ;  the  lymphocytic  reaction  was  diminished 
in  these  instances  if  contact  with  the  meninges  was  avoided.  Greene  and  Saxton 
succeeded  in  transplanting  into  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  of- rabbits, 
homoiogenous  tumors  which  failed  to  grow  when  the  usual  modes  of  trans- 
plantation were  tried.  In  1937,  a  Russian  investigator,  Smirnova,  observed 
that  human  and  mouse  tumors  grew  from  four  to  six  months  in  the  anterior 
chamber  of  the  eye  of  rats.  Greene  carried  out  successful  serial  transplanta- 
tions of  rabbit  tumors  in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  of  guinea  pigs;  a 
human  fibrosarcoma,  and  even  a  human  scirrhous  cancer  of  the  mammary 
gland,  grew  in  this  organ.  The  chick  chorio-allantoic  membrane,  the  brain  and 
the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  represent  places  where  the  aggressive  reactions 
on  the  part  of  the  host  are  diminished.  In  a  previous  chapter  we  have  dis- 
cussed already,  to  some  extent,  the  factors  which  make  possible  a  better 
growth  of  heterogenous  embryonal  and  tumor  tissues  in  these  places  and  we 
shall  return  to  this  problem  later,  when  we'  analyze  the  processes  of  immunity 
which  develop  againts  transplanted  tumors.  In  this  connection  we  may  refer 
also  to  long-continued  growth  of  benign  and  malignant  tumors  in  roller-tube 
tissue  cultures,  in  which  the  medium  consisted  of  coagulated  chicken  plasma 
covered  by  human  serum  (Gey,  Coman). 

Also  by  other  means  it  was  possible  to  improve  the  growth  of  tumors  in 
hosts  bearing  strange  individuality  or  species  differentials.  Thus  it  was  found 
that  after  previous  irradiation  of  the  host  by  a  sufficient  dose  of  X-rays  the 
resistance  of  the  latter  against  the  growth  of  homoiogenous  as  well  as  of 
heterogenous  tumors  was  diminished  (Murphy,  Clemmensen  and  others). 
Moreover,  the  transfer  of  mouse  leucosis  to  otherwise  unfavorable  hosts 
could  be  promoted  by  these  means  (Krebs,  Furth).  Not  only  tumor  and 
leukemic  cells  could  thus  be  transferred  more  successfully,  but  also  Shope's 
rabbit  fibroma  virus,  when  injected  into  X-rayed  or  tarred  rabbits,  caused 
generalized  fibromatosis,  the  tumors  showed  a  prolonged  growth  in  these 
animals  and  in  one  case  the  fibroma  assumed  a  sarcomatous  character  (An- 
drewes).  According  to  Maisin  and  Masse,  also  minced  embryonal  chick  tissue 
develops,  in  chickens  previously  treated  with  tar,  into  larger  embryomata, 
which  persist  for  a  longer  time.  Injections  of  trypan  blue  and  of  other 
colloidal  substances  (Lignac,  Ludford,  Andervont)  diminish  the  resistance 
to  the  growth  of  tumors  in  homoiogenous  hosts,  and  in  addition,  trypan  blue 
inhibits  the  development  of  some  types  of  immunity  (Andervont). 

These  various  agents,  X-rays,  colloidal  dyes  and  tarring,  act  presumably  on 
the  reticulo-endothelial  system,  the  usual  place  for  the  production  of  general- 
ized immune  reactions.  On  the  other  hand,  the  possibility  must  be  considered 
that  also  the  primary  reactions  against  strange  normal  tissue,  tumor  or  virus, 
due  to  the  presence  of  preformed  substances,  may  depend  upon  the  reticulo- 


358  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

endothelial  system.  This  is  perhaps  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the  lymphocytes 
and  leucocytes  of  the  blood  may  react  as  early  as  within  the  first  few  days 
against  a  homoio-  or  heterotransplant  of  normal  tissue  or  tumor. 

But  there  are  several  observations  which  indicate  that  the  application  of 
X-rays,  injections  of  tar,  or  perhaps  even  of  trypan  blue,  may  have  results  of 
a  quite  different  kind ;  they  may  promote  the  induction  of  autogenous  cancers 
elsewhere  in  mice  under  the  influence  of  tar  or  other  carcinogenic  substances 
(Mayngord  and  Parsons,  Maisin  and  Masse,  Andervont).  A  related  phenom- 
enon is  probably  the  effect  of  X-rays  or  tar  on  the  development  of  rabbit 
fibroma  following  the  injection  of  virus  mentioned  above.  In  addition,  Rous 
and  his  collaborators  produced  carcinomata  in  rabbits  through  intravenous 
injection  of  rabbit  papilloma  virus,  in  places  where  the  skin  had  been  irritated 
through  previous  applications  of  tar.  These  effects  cannot  be  due  to  an  inhibi- 
tion of  immune  processes  developing  against  strange  tissues  or  tumors  and 
their  organismal  differentials,  but  mechanisms  of  a  different  kind  must  be 
active  in  these  experiment. 

Taken  altogether,  these  experiments  add  further  data  in  support  of  the 
conclusion  that  in  principle  the  host  reacts  in  a  similar  way  against  normal 
tissues  and  against  tumors,  but  that  secondary  factors  may  be  added  in  the 
case  of  tumors,  which  may  induce  certain  modifications  in  the  types  of  reaction 
which  occur;  and  furthermore,  that  it  is  the  organismal  differentials  which 
normal  tissues  and  tumors  have  in  common. 

Transplantation  of  Benign  Tumors 

We  have,  so  far,  analyzed  some  of  the  principal  factors  which  determine 
the  growth  of  transplanted  malignant  tumors,  with  particular  regard  to  the 
significance  of  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  It  will  be  of 
interest,  now,  to  compare  with  the  growth  of  cancerous  tissue,  that  of  benign 
tumors.  In  experiments  beginning  in  1901,  and  continuing  at  various  periods 
during  the  course  of  the  following  thirteen  years,  we  transplanted,  at  various 
times,  altogether  four  mammary  fibroadenomata  and  two  mammary  fibromata 
of  the  rat,  and,  with  S.  Leopold,  a  mixed  mammary  tumor,  a  chondromyx- 
adenoma  of  a  dog.  Similar  experiments  were  subsequently  reported  by  Rib- 
bert,  Borrel  and  Petit,  and  more  recently,  by  Mann,  Robinson  and  Grauer, 
Heiman,  Heiman  and  Krehbiehl,  Umehara,  Picco,  Oberling,  and  the  Guerins, 
Emge  and  Wulff,  as  well  as  by  Wolfe,  Burack  and  Wright. 

From  our  investigations  the  following  conclusions  may  be  drawn :  Benign 
tumors  show  a  reaction  in  certain  respects  intermediate  between  that  of 
normal  tissues,  which  after  serial  transplantation  manifest  at  most  only  a 
very  limited  and  transitory  regenerative  growth,  and  that  of  malignant  tumors. 
If  they  grow  at  all,  they  usually  do  so  only  very  slowly  and  after  a  relatively 
long  preceding  latent  period,  during  which,  however,  mitotic  proliferation  may 
occur.  In  the  majority  of  cases  we  had  to  deal  with  tumors  of  the  mammary 
gland,  which  were  composed  of  adenomatous  as  well  as  of  fibrous  constit- 
uents, and  both  could  take  part  in  the  subsequent  proliferation;  the  fibrous 
portion  evidently  did  not  represent  merely  the  stroma  of  the  epithelial  struc- 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  359 

tures,  but  a  part  of  the  tumor  itself.  The  tumors  grew,  as  a  rule,  only  in  the 
same  animal  in  which  they  originated  and  not  in  other  animals  of  the  same 
species.  The  individuality  differential,  therefore,  asserted  itself  under  these 
conditions.  This  was  observed  in  some  of  our  experiments,  as  well  as  in  those 
of  Ribbert  and  Mann,  but  we,  as  well  as  subsequent  investigators,  found  that 
different  benign  tumors  may  differ  in  their  power  of  resistance  to  homoio- 
toxins,  it  being  possible  to  transplant  certain  of  them  serially  into  other  in- 
dividuals of  the  same  species.  We  observed,  furthermore,  that  while  after 
transplantation  of  carcinoma  or  sarcoma,  the  greater  part  of  the  transplant 
became  necrotic  and  only  a  small  peripheral  zone  remained  alive,  in  the  case 
of  these  benign  tumors  of  the  mammary  gland  a  greater  portion  of  the  pe- 
ripheral tissue  could  be  preserved,  and  in  some  autotransplanted  tumors  even 
almost  the  whole  of  the  transplant;  evidently  some  of  the  constituent  parts  of 
the  tumors,  especially  the  fibrous  ones,  were  more  resistant  than  very  cellu- 
lar and  rapidly  dividing  malignant  cells.  In  addition,  while  with  malignant 
tumors  as  a  rule,  an  increase  in  growth  energy  occurred  in  the  course  of  the 
first  few  transplantations,  such  an  increase  was  lacking  with  these  adenofibro- 
mata.  In  our  experiments  there  was  a  gradual  decline  in  the  growth  energy 
after  successive  transplantations.  Another  difference  between  these  two  types 
of  tumors  consisted  in  the  different  effects  which  hormones  exerted  on  their 
growth.  Cancerous  tissues,  in  particular  carcinomas  of  the  mammary  gland, 
are  no  longer  accessible  to  the  action  of  ovarian  hormones,  whereas  a  positive 
effect  was  quite  evident  in  the  case  of  benign  tumors  of  the  mammary  gland ; 
such  tumors  retained  the  ability  to  respond  with  marked  growth  processes  to 
the  action  of  hormones,  which  determine  the  growth  processes  in  the  normal 
breast  tissue  during  pregnancy.  The  cells  of  these  adenofibromata  evidently 
had  not  changed  their  physiological  characteristics  to  the  same  extent  as  the 
cells  of  malignant  mammary  gland  tumors.  Moreover,  while  in  our  experi- 
ments the  tumors  were  propagated  mainly  in  female  rats  they  were  able,  also 
to  grow  in  male  rats. 

It  may  therefore  be  concluded  that  the  fate  of  the  transplanted  benign 
tumor  depends  not  only  on  the  organismal  differentials,  but  also  on  its  mode 
of  growth  and  some  other  factors,  which  are  localized  either  in  the  tumor 
cells  themselves  or  are  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host.  Some  of  the 
factors  localized  in  the  tumor  cells  correspond  to  those  present  also  in  normal 
tissues,  in  particular,  the  organ  or  tissue  differentials,  which  help  to  determine 
whether  a  tissue  is  able  to  withstand  the  injury  connected  with  autotrans- 
plantation. 

A  further  factor  in  determining  transplantability  is  the  increase  in  growth 
energy  acquired  by  normal  tissues  during  their  transformation  into  benign 
tumors.  This  additionl  growth  is  relatively  slight,  although  it  varies  in  different 
benign  tumors.  Correspondingly,  the  morphological  and  biochemical  modi- 
fications, which  the  normal  tissues  undergo  during  their  change  into  benign 
tumors,  are  less  marked  than  those  which  take  place  during  their  change  into 
malignant  tumors.  In  this  respect  again,  different  benign  tumors  may  behave 
somewhat  differently,  and  it  should  therefore  be  expected  that  they  show  a 


360  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

different  degree  of  transplantability.  This  is  indeed  a  fact,  as  our  own  experi- 
ments have  already  indicated  and  as  the  subsequent,  more  extensive  experi- 
ments of  various  investigators,  especially  those  of  Heiman,  Emge  and  Wolfe, 
and  their  collaborators,  have  shown.  Thus  certain  benign  tumors  cannot  even 
be  autotransplanted,  while  some  others  can  be  homoiotransplanted  through 
a  number  of  generations.  But  when  homoiotransplantation  does  succeed,  the 
latent  period  is  usually  long  and  the  subsequent  growth  very  slow. 

Fibrous  tissue  was  a  relatively  prominent  constituent  in  many  of  the  benign 
tumors  which  so  far  have  been  used  by  various  investigators  for  homoiotrans- 
plantation ;  it  surrounds  and  protects  the  epithelial  structures.  It  is  very  prob- 
able that  homoiotoxins  are  not  given  off  to  any  considerable  extent  by  tissues 
of  this  kind,  and  hence  accumulations  of  lymphocytes  are  not  prominent  after 
homoiotransplantation  of  such  tumors. 

Subsequent  experiments,  especially  those  of  Heiman,  of  Emge,  and  of 
Wright  and  Wolfe,  have  contributed  further  data  as  to  the  influence  of 
hormones  on  the  growth  of  these  tumors.  Castration  of  the  host  had  a 
marked  effect,  in  the  investigations  of  Heiman,  and  Heiman  and  Krehbiehl, 
castration  of  female  rats  lowering,  and  castration  of  male  rats  improving  the 
transplantability.  Furthermore,  gonadotropic  hormones,  and  still  more  so, 
combinations  of  these  hormones  with  estrogen,  and  also  estrogen  alone,  could 
promote  very  noticeably  proliferative  processes  in  these  tumors,  especially  in 
castrated  female  and  male,  as  well  as  in  normal  male  rats.  However,  while 
application  of  these  hormones  was  thus  effective  in  intensifying  growth  ac- 
tivity in  these  tumors,  and  in  some  instances  especially  in  their  adenomatous 
constituents,  it  has  not  been  possible  so  far  to  increase  thereby  the  growth 
energy  to  such  an  extent  that  a  definite  transformation  into  a  carcinoma  took 
place.  However,  it  seems  that  Wright  and  Wolfe  succeeded,  by  means  of 
estrogen  injections  for  as  long  as  50  days  or  more,  in  producing  proliferations 
in  the  epithelial  parts  of  a  fibroadenoma  in  rats,  which  seemed  to  be  pre- 
cancerous or  perhaps  represented  beginning  cancerous  changes.  On  the  other 
hand,  both  Heiman  and  Emge  were  able,  in  some  tumors,  to  stimulate  the 
growth  of  the  connective-tissue  constituent  so  markedly  that  a  fibroma  became 
converted  into  a  spindle-cell  sarcoma;  it  seems  that  this  stimulation  was  the 
result  of  continued  serial  transplantations,  but  there  are  some  indications  that 
in  some  cases  also  stimulation  by  pituitary-like  hormones  exerted  similar 
effects.  The  beneficial  effect  of  gonadotropic  hormones  on  the  growth  of  the 
tumors  also  in  castrated  females  suggests  a  direct  action  on  the  tumor  rather 
than  an  action  mediated  by  the  sex  glands.  Androgenic  hormones,  on  the  other 
hand,  tended  on  the  whole  to  diminish  the  number  of  successful  transplanta- 
tions of  fibroadenomata  of  the  mammary  gland;  an  action  which  is  in  agree- 
ment with  the  fact  that  castration  in  male  rats,  which  means  removel  of  the  sex 
hormones,  raises  the  number  of  takes  of  these  tumors.  According  to  Heiman, 
also  progesterone  inhibited  the  growth  of  the  epithelial  portion  of  the  fibro- 
adenoma, and  it  reduced  the  number  of  takes;  still  more  effective  in  this 
respect  was  a  combination  of  testosterone  and  progesterone. 

It  may  be  assumed  that  the  intensification  of  the  growth  energy  of  some 


TUMORS  AND  NORMAL  TISSUES  361 

of  these  fibroadenomas  of  the  mammary  gland  under  the  influence  of  cer- 
tain hormones  may  enable  them  to  overcome  the  resistance  to  their  growth, 
caused  by  unfavorable  individuality  differentials  of  hosts,  and  to  grow,  there- 
fore, after  homoiotransplantation.  There  were  also  some  indications  that  there 
exist  strain  differences,  a  certain  tumor  growing  better  in  one  strain  of  rats 
than  in  another;  presumably  strains  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  of 
the  rats  were  similar  to  that  of  the  tumor  were  more  suitable  than  strains 
with  more  strange  individuality  differentials. 

While  as  the  result  of  the  growth  or  of  the  retrogression  of  transplanted 
malignant  tumors  the  bearers  of  the  transplant  may  become  immune  against  a 
second  transplantation,  such  an  immunity  has  not  been  observed  in  the  case  of 
benign  tumors;  the  latter  behaved  in  this  respect,  as  well  as  in  the  lack  of 
adaptive  processes  and  in  their  responsiveness  to  hormones,  similar  to  normal 
tissues,  while  as  far  as  the  growth  energy  and  abnormal  mode  of  growth  is 
concerned,  they  are  intermediate  between  normal  tissues  and  cancers.  In 
cancerous  tissue  the  inner  growth  factor  (Gi)  has  become  so  strong  and 
provides  so  stable  a  growth  momentum  to  the  tumor  cells  that  extrinsic  fac- 
tors (Ge),  such  as  hormones,  have  no  longer  any  chance  to  affect  the  growth 
to  any  marked  extent.  In  normal  tissues  and  benign  tumors  the  relation  be- 
tween Gi  and  Ge  differs  in  favor  of  Ge,  whereas  in  cancerous  growth  Gi 
predominates ;  in  addition,  other  changes  may  have  taken  place  in  the  tissues 
during  their  cancerous  transformation,  which  tend  to  diminish  the  effective- 
ness of  regulatory  processes.  It  is  then  the  strength  of  Gi  (endogenous  growth 
factor)  which  is  one  of  the  factors  enabling  a  cancerous  tumor  to  overcome 
difficulties  in  transplantation,  and  especially  in  serial  transplantation,  and  per- 
haps the  main  difficulties  in  the  way  of  the  transplanted  cells  consist  in  differ- 
ences in  the  individuality  and  species  differentials  between  host  and  trans- 
plant. In  tumors  in  which  Gi  has  not  yet  reached  sufficient  strength,  there  is 
therefore  need  for  the  additional  and  longer  continued  action  of  Ge 
(exogenous  growth  factor)  and  this  applies  especially  to  certain  benign 
tumors,  where  hormones  may  affect  favorably  the  growth  of  transplanted 
fibroadenomas.  Also,  in  certain  other  tumors  which  have  not  yet  reached  a 
fully  cancerous  state,  the  effect  of  Ge,  acting  on  the  host  of  the  graft,  may  be 
required  for  a  successful  growth  of  the  tumor  in  the  strange  host;  thus 
Gardner  noted  that  estrogen  administration  in  male  mice  could  make  possible 
the  development  of  transplanted  tumors  of  the  interstitial  gland  of  the  tes- 
ticle. Although  such  tumors  could  occasionally  metastasize,  on  the  whole  they 
had  reached  only  a  very  low  degree  of  growth  momentum,  or,  expressed 
differently,  they  had  not  yet  progressed  very  far  in  the  process  of  cancela- 
tion. They  therefore  could  be  transplanted  successfully  only  if  the  host  re- 
ceived, at  the  same  time,  estrogen.  The  same  factor,  Ge,  which  helped  to 
cause  in  the  normal  tissue  the  increase  in  Gi  and  thus  the  transformation  into 
cancer,  was  needed  in  order  to  add  to  the  growth  momentum  of  the  trans- 
plant and  aid  it  in  surviving  and  growing  under  otherwise  not  quite  adequate 
conditions.  There  seemed  to  exist  a  somewhat  similar  action  of  Ge  in  the 
transmission  of  leukemia  from  hybrids  between  mice  belonging  to  a  leukemic 


362  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

and  to  a  non-leukemic  strain  to  the  parent  strains ;  this  transmission  could  be 
accomplished  only  in  the  parent  belonging  to  the  leukemic  strain,  perhaps 
because  here  a  factor  favorable  to  the  development  of  leukemia  was  active. 

All  the  data  which  have  been  considered  so  far  lead,  then,  to  the  conclusion 
that  in  normal  tissues  and  benign  tumors,  as  well  as  in  cancers,  the  organismal 
differentials  are  present  and  affect  the  results  of  transplantation,  but  that  in 
cancers  the  increase  in  inner  growth  momentum  and  perhaps  other  changes 
which  make  possible  an  increased  adaptation  to  environmental  conditions  in 
the  host,  may  help  to  overcome  the  unfavorable  effects  of  strange  organismal 
differentials. 

The  essential  similarity  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  tumors  and 
normal  tissues,  and  the  similar  significance  which  both  of  these  differentials 
have  in  determining  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  transplants  have  been 
made  evident  also  by  the  recent  investigations  of  H.  T.  Blumenthal,  who 
studied  the  effects  of  various  types  of  transplants  on  the  character  of  the 
white  blood  cells  in  the  circulating  blood.  We  shall  discuss  his  findings  more 
fully  in  the  fourth  chapter  of  this  part,  where  we  analyze  the  cellular  reactions 
in  the  bodyfluids  which  develop  against  tumors. 


Chapter  2 
Heredity  and  Transplantation  of  Tumors 

In  the  preceding  chapter  it  has  been  shown  that  the  results  of  autogenous, 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  transplantations  of  tumors  differ  great- 
ly and  that  the  differences  are  very  similar  to  those  found  in  correspond- 
ing transplantations  of  normal  tissues.  In  both  tumors  and  normal  tissues  the 
organismal  differentials  are  identical,  or  almost  identical,  in  host  and  graft 
in  case  of  autotransplantation ;  they  are  different  in  case  of  homoiotransplanta- 
tion,  and  still  more  unlike  in  case  of  heterotransplantation.  While  these  inves- 
tigations have  established,  in  a  definite  way,  the  importance  of  organismal 
differentials,  and  therefore  also  of  heredity  in  the  transplantation  of  tumors, 
there  were  already  some  earlier  observations  which  pointed  to  the  significance 
of  constitutional  hereditary  factors.  Thus  Morau,  in  his  transplantations  of 
mouse  carcinoma,  believed  that  in  the  offspring  of  mice  in  which  the  tumors 
could  be  transplanted  successfully,  the  chances  for  the  growth  of  the  trans- 
planted tumor  were  better  than  in  not  directly  related  mice.  At  an  early 
stage  in  our  first  series  of  transplantations  of  rat  sarcoma,  we  found  that  this 
tumor  did  not  grow  in  a  strange  species,  even  in  one  nearly  related  to  the  rat ; 
neither  did  it  grow  in  some  white  rats;  but  it  did  grow  in  a  hybrid  between 
a  gray  and  a  white  rat.  At  that  time  we  decided,  therefore,  to  study  the  finer 
differences  within  white  rats  which  determine  their  suitability  or  lack  of 
suitability  as  hosts  for  these  tumors.  The  presence  of  a  constitutional  element 
in  tumor  transplantation  was  also  indicted  by  our  observations  that  in  the 
same  individual  in  the  case  of  multiple  simultaneous  transplantations  of  the 
same  kind  of  tumor,  either  all  or  none  of  them  took  ;  and  that  if  a  transplanted 
tissue  did  not  take  in  an  individual  rat,  subsequent  transplantations  proved 
usually  likewise  negative,  although  some  exceptions  to  this  rule  occurred,  in- 
dicating that  certain  accidental,  variable  factors  complicated  these  experi- 
ments. Similar  observations  were  made  by  Jensen  in  his  serial  transplanta- 
tions of  mouse  carcinoma.  Subsequently,  Michaelis,  as  well  as  Bashford  and 
Murray  and  others,  found  that  white  mice  obtained  from  different  localities 
differed  in  the  number  of  takes  which  followed  inoculation  with  mouse  car- 
cinoma. In  the  meantime,  we  had  successfully  transplanted  a  carcinoma,  origi- 
nating in  a  Japanese  waltzing  mouse,  in  about  100%  of  all  Japanese  waltzers, 
although  the  growth  in  the  first  generation  of  transplants  was  slow.  This 
indicated  that  here  we  had  to  deal  with  a  very  favorable  soil  of  a  homozygous 
character.  A  few  years  later,  Tyzzer  (1909)  studied  the  differences  in  the 
number  of  takes  of  another  carcinoma,  which  had  developed  spontaneously 
in  a  Japanese  waltzing  mouse,  after  transplantation  into  Japanese,  into  com- 
mon white  mice,  and  into  hybrids  between  these  two  species  or  subspecies. 
Tyzzer  expressed  the  view  that  hereditary  factors  determine  the  differences  in 

363 


364  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

suitability  of  the  hosts  for  the  tumor  he  used ;  however,  in  his  experiments  he 
had  to  deal  with  mice  which  belonged  to  different  subspecies.  Cuenot  and 
Mercier  separated,  through  breeding  of  white  mice  from  their  locality,  fam- 
ilies in  each  of  which  the  degree  of  transplantability  was  a  fixed  quantity 
which  was  inheritable ;  they  believed  that,  through  breeding,  they  had  been 
able  to  sort  out  what  corresponded  to  Johannsen's  pure  lines.  But  such  in- 
vestigators as  O.  Hertwig  and  Poll,  and  C.  Lewin,  denied  the  existence  of 
these  differences  of  susceptibility  to  tumor  transplantation  between  different 
families  or  strains  within  the  same  species,  and  it  was  especially  an  experi- 
ment of  Haaland  which  was  responsible  for  the  assumption,  subsequently 
made,  that  adaptive  variations  in  the  animals,  taking  place  in  response  to 
changes  in  the  environment,  rather  than  fixed  constitutional  characteristics 
were  the  cause  of  these  differences  between  different  strains.  Haaland  ob- 
served that  mice  bred  in  or  near  Frankfurt,  which  were  suitable  as  hosts  for 
Ehrlich's  mouse  sarcoma,  became  unsuitable  after  they  had  been  transferred 
to  Norway  and  bred  there  for  a  short  time.  He  attributed  this  change  to  the 
difference  in  the  kind  of  food  given  to  the  mice  in  these  two  localities  and 
concluded,  therefore,  that  the  suitability  of  hosts  for  a  certain  tumor  de- 
pended on  variable  environmental,  rather  than  on  fixed  inheritable  conditions. 
Other  investigators  confirmed  Haaland's  observations  and  accepted  his  con- 
clusions as  to  the  effect  of  various  kinds  of  food  on  the  number  of  takes  of 
a  certain  tumor. 

On  the  other  hand,  our  investigations,  made  in  conjunction  with  M.  S. 
Fleisher  (1912),  showed  that  the  differences  in  transplantability  occurring  in 
different  strains  of  mice  depend  upon  fixed  hereditary  conditions,  which  are  in- 
dependent of  environmental  factors.  American  and  different  types  of  European 
white  mice,  all  fed  in  the  same  way  and  bred  separately  under  identical  en- 
vironmental conditions,  each  maintained  its  characteristic  transplantability  in- 
dex for  a  carcinoma  which  had  developed  spontaneously  in  an  American 
mouse.  Subsequently  Morpurgo,  and  also  Roffo,  made  similar  observations. 
The  change  which  Haaland  found  in  his  mice  after  transfer  to  Norway  was 
interpreted  by  us  in  a  different  manner,  because  we  noted  that  in  one  of  our 
European  strains  a  change  in  its  suitability  as  host  took  place  as  a  result  of  a 
disease  which  eliminated  a  number  of  families.  Evidently  a  selection  had 
occurred,  causing  the  survival  of  a  family  which  differed  genetically  from 
the  rest,  and  which  now  began  to  predominate  over  the  other  mice.  As  a 
result  of  this  selection  process,  the  transplantability  rose  considerably  in  this 
strain.  However,  the  results  of  transplantation  depend  not  only  on  the  host, 
but  also  on  the  kind  of  tumors  which  are  used  for  inoculation.  Thus  Haaland 
noted  that  if  each  mouse  is  inoculated  with  two  different  types  of  tumor,  the 
receptivity  of  different  strains  of  mice  differed  for  each  tumor.  As  we  may 
now  express  it,  the  transplantability  depends  upon  the  relation  of  the  in- 
dividuality or  organismal  differentials  of  the  host  to  those  of  the  transplant. 
But  we  must  make  the  reservation  that,  within  a  certain  range,  adaptive 
changes  may  take  place  in  the  tumor  cells  and  that  thereby  the  results  may  be 
modified. 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      365 

The  transition  from  the  ordinary  strains  of  animals  to  closely  inbred,  homo- 
zygous strains  is  a  gradual  one ;  it  takes  place  step  by  step.  The  guinea  pigs 
and  rats  which  we  used  at  first  in  our  transplantations  of  normal  tissues  did 
not  belong  to  inbred  strains.  We  determined  the  organismal  differentials  by 
comparing  the  effects  of  auto-,  various  kinds  of  syngenesio-,  homoio-  and 
heterotransplantations.  Because  we  did  not  have  to  deal  with  closely  inbred 
strains,  variability  in  the  results  within  certain  limits  in  the  syngenesious- 
homoiogenous  range  of  the  spectrum  of  relationships  may  therefore  be  ex- 
pected, and  this  was  actually  observed.  But  this  difficulty  could  be  over- 
come by  increasing  the  number  of  experiments  in  which  we  tested  the  effects 
of  relationship  on  the  fate  of  the  transplants.  The  greater  the  number  of  un- 
known factors,  the  greater  must  be  the  number  of  equations.  The  conclu- 
sions reached  in  these  earlier  experiments  concerning  the  significance  of  the 
relations  between  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  on  the  fate 
of  the  latter  were  confirmed  in  our  subsequent  investigations  with  closely  in- 
bred strains  of  guinea  pigs  and  rats.  However,  a  fully  homozygous  condition 
had  not  yet  been  reached  in  the  case  of  the  inbred  guinea  pigs ;  in  the  case  of 
the  rats,  the  heterozygous  condition  had  only  very  slightly  been  diminished 
after  as  many  as  forty  generations  of'  close  sister-brother  inbreeding.  As 
stated,  our  early  observations  on  the  transplantation  and  spontaneous  develop- 
ment of  tumors  in  mice  were  made  in  partly  inbred  strains.  The  same  limita- 
tions applied  here  as  in  the  earlier  transplantations  of  normal  tissues  in 
guinea  pigs  and  rats.  In  both  instances,  the  difficulties  due  to  the  larger  num- 
ber of  variable  factors  present  made  necessary  a  larger  number  of  experi- 
ments. Likewise,  in  the  case  of  tumor  transplantations  subsequent  experiments 
by  various  investigators  and  also  by  ourselves  with  more  fully  homozygous 
strains  confirmed  essentially  the  earlier  conclusions.  It  must,  however,  be 
emphasized  that  even  these  closely  inbred  strains  had,   in  all  probability, 
not  yet  reached  a  completely  homozygous  condition.  There  is  therefore  only 
a  quantitative  difference  in  the  nature  of  the  strains  used  in  the  earlier  and 
in  the  later  investigations,  and  both  lead  to  the  same  results  provided  a  suffi- 
cient number  of  experiments  are  made. 

All  these  observations  and  experiments  point  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
transplantability  of  tumors  depends  largely  on  the  relations  between  the 
genetic  constitutions  of  host  and  donor  and  the  character  of  the  organismal 
differentials,  which  is  the  expression  of  these  constitutions.  But  there  is  one 
finding  which  seems  contradictory  to  these  conclusions.  Rous  and  Long  dis- 
covered that  their  third  chicken  sarcoma,  which  had  originated  in  a  Leghorn, 
grew,  on  the  average,  better  after  transplantation  into  Plymouth  Rock  chickens 
than  in  Leghorns.  Presumably  factors  of  a  secondary  character  complicated 
the  relationship  between  tumor  and  host  in  this  case,  or  this  condition  may 
possibly  have  been  due  to  peculiarities  of  the  agent  present  in  these  tumors 
rather  than  to  those  of  the  tumor  cells.  But  before  entering  into  a  further 
discussion  of  genetic  factors  in  the  transplanted  tumors,  we  must  again  con- 
sider the  difficulty  which  we  experience  if  we  analyze  tumor  growth  by  means 
of  transplantation  of  the  ordinary  transplantable  tumors. 


366  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

In  the  case  of  normal  tissues  we  used  as  criteria  of  the  suitability  of  the 
transplant  for  the  host,  or  of  that  of  the  host  for  the  transplant,  the  changes 
which  the  graft  underwent  in  the  host  and  the  reactions  of  the  host  tissues, 
especially  the  lymphocytes,  connective  tissue  and  blood  vessels,  against  the 
transplant.  In  this  way  we  could  show  that  there  is  a  close  correspondence  be- 
tween transplantability  and  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  trans- 
plant, as  determined  by  the  genetic  constitution  of  host  and  donor.  In  the  case 
of  tumors,  conditions  are  somewhat  different.  In  general,  in  these  experiments 
tumors  are  used  which  are  easily  transplantable,  which  means  that  they  grow 
readily  in  a  large  number  of  individuals  of  the  same  species.  Finer  individual 
differences  in  relationship,  such  as  those  between  parents  and  children,  and  be- 
tween brothers,  and  even  between  somewhat  farther  distant  relatives  such 
as  those  tested  by  us  in  the  case  of  normal  tissues,  cannot  be  distinguished  if 
such  transplantable  tumors  are  used.  The  behavior  of  the  latter  towards  dif- 
ferent individuals  belonging  to  species  and  strains  in  which  they  are  readily 
transplantable,  is  to  all  appearances  about  the  same.  For  this  reason,  only 
very  marked  differences  between  different  hosts  can  be  discovered  in  this 
way;  they  represent  either  strain  differences  or  even  differences  as  great  as 
those  between  subspecies,  or  those  obtaining  between  hybrids  which  result 
from  the  mating  of  two  different  strains.  Furthermore,  the  standards  used 
for  the  determination  of  the  degree  of  transplantability  are  different  for 
tumors  and  for  normal  tissues.  For  the  latter,  a  more  delicate  grading  of  the 
suitability  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  is  made 
possible  by  the  evaluation  of  the  histologic  changes  which  take  place  in  the 
cellular  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  graft.  These  criteria  are  not  com- 
monly used  or  available  in  the  case  of  tumor  transplantations;  instead,  the 
number  of  growing  tumors  (takes)  and,  less  frequently,  the  growth  energy 
of  the  tumors  are  employed  as  criteria  of  the  differences  in  individuality  differ- 
entials. In  the  investigations  of  M.  S.  Fleisher  and  the  writer,  a  comparison 
was  made  between  the  averages  of  growth  energy  and  number  of  takes  as 
criteria  of  transplantability;  in  addition,  we  noted  the  duration  of  the  latent 
period,  that  is,  the  length  of  time  which  intervenes  between  the  date  of  trans- 
plantation and  the  appearance  of  the  tumor  visible  to  the  naked  eye.  The 
length  of  the  latent  period  measures  the  growth  energy  in  the  first  and  most 
critical  period  following  grafting.  It  was  found  that  the  conditions  deter- 
mining the  number  of  takes  are  in  certain  respects  distinct  from  those  de- 
termining growth  energy,  while  in  other  respects  they  are  correlated  with 
each  other.  Both  these  factors  depend  primarily  upon  the  relations  of  the 
organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  and  secondarily,  upon  the 
growth  energy  of  the  graft  and  upon  the  adaptability  of  the  transplant  to 
different  hosts  or  of  the  host  to  different  transplants.  However,  tumors  which 
may  all  be  classed  as  transplantable,  may  still  differ  as  to  their  growth  energy  ; 
thus,  in  two  parallel  series  of  experiments,  all  inoculations  may  be  followed 
by  growth  of  the  graft  and  therefore  be  considered  as  takes ;  yet,  in  one  set 
of  hosts  the  growth  energy  may  be  greater  than  in  the  other.  In  general,  differ- 
ences in  growth  energy  in  a  certain  host  represent  finer  gradations  of  the 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      367 

mutual  suitability  of  hosts  and  grafts  than  do  differences  in  the  number  of 
takes.  This  was  quite  evident,  for  instance,  in  some  of  our  experiments  in 
which  mouse  carcinoma  IX,  in  the  beginning,  grew  in  all  the  mice  inoculated 
and  the  number  of  takes  was,  therefore,  100  per  cent;  for  a  time  following 
transplantation,  also  the  growth  energy  was  approximately  the  same,  or  at 
least  similar ;  but  after  a  certain  size  had  been  reached  by  the  transplants  the 
growth  energy  diminished  in  some  of  the  animals,  the  tumors  retrogressed  and 
finally  disappeared,  while  in  others  they  continued  to  grow.  The  main  distin- 
guishing feature  between  the  tumors  in  the  different  hosts  was  the  develop- 
ment or  accumulation  in  some  of  the  animals  of  certain  unfavorable  factors, 
which  caused  a  slowing  of  the  growth  or  even  a  retrogression  of  the  tumors, 
while  in  others,  conditions  were  more  favorable  and  the  growth  energy  was 
not  markedly  diminished. 

To  return  now  to  the  study  of  the  conditions  which  determine  the  results  in 
transplantation  of  tumors,  Tyzzer  (1909)  hybridized  two  strains  of  animals, 
one  of  which  was  very  favorable  and  the  other  very  unfavorable  to  the  trans- 
plantation of  a  certain  tumor.  In  a  Japanese  waltzing  mouse  a  tumor  developed, 
which  grew  in  100  per  cent  of  Japanese  mice  but  not  at  all  in  white  mice.  As 
stated  above,  the  Japanese  waltzing  mice  have  apparently  become  a  relatively 
homozygous  strain  or  subspecies.  Tyzzer  found  that  in  the  Fx  hybrids  between 
the  Japanese  and  white  mice  the  tumor  grew  as  well  or  even  better  than  in 
the  Japanese  mice,  whereas  in  the  F2  and  F3  hybrid  generations  no  growth  took 
place.  As  we  have  already  stated,  it  is  not  possible  to  analyze  the  individuality 
differentials  if  we  use  one  of  the  readily  transplantable  tumors,  because  these 
tumors  grow  in  many  animals  of  the  same  species,  without  regard  to  differ- 
ences in  the  individuality  differentials ;  there  may,  however,  be  some  differ- 
ences in  the  average  number  of  takes  in  different  kinds  of  strains,  in  which 
the  averages  of  individuality  differentials  are  different.  However,  Tyzzer  in 
his  series  of  transplantations  did  not  actually  study  strain  differentials,  but 
something  akin  to  subspecies  differentials.  He  concluded  from  his  experi- 
ments that  the  inheritance  of  factors  which  determined  the  transplantability 
of  tumors  did  not  take  place  in  accordance  with  Mendelian  principles. 

In  the  following  year  (1910)  Cuenot  and  Mercier,  to  whose  investigations 
we  have  already  referred,  were  concerned  with  the  inheritance  of  the  factors 
influencing  tumor  transplantability  in  white  mice.  They  believed  that  it  was 
possible  to  sort  out,  in  these  animals,  pure  lines  in  which  the  average  trans- 
plantability of  a  certain  tumor  was  a  fixed  quantity;  furthermore,  they  be- 
lieved that  the  extent  of  the  deviation  from  this  mean  was  likewise  a  charac- 
teristic feature  for  a  pure  line.  The  pure  line  to  which  a  mouse  belongs 
determines  the  percentage  of  cases  in  which  a  tumor  can  be  transplanted; 
on  the  other  hand,  the  character  of  the  parents  does  not  necessarily  indicate 
whether  a  transplanted  tumor  piece  will  grow  in  a  child;  this  may  depend 
on  phenotypic  rather  than  on  genetic  conditions.  However,  in  the  light^of  what 
we  now  know,  it  is  more  difficult  to  obtain  pure,  fully  homozygous  strains 
even  through  long-continued  close  inbreeding,  than  should  be  assumed  on 
theoretical  grounds,  and  it  is  therefore  improbable  that  Cuenot  and  Mercier 


368  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

worked  with  pure  lines.  Levin  and  Sittenfield  soon  afterwards  noted  that  the 
offspring  of  non-susceptible  rats  were  less  susceptible  to  the  growth  of  a 
sarcoma  than  the  offspring  of  susceptible  rats. 

In  experiments  with  mouse  carcinoma  IX  it  was  shown  by  Fleisher  and 
the  writer  (1912)  that  this  tumor  could  be  successfully  transplanted  into  a 
strain  of  American  mice  in  80  per  cent  of  the  cases,  into  a  first  strain  of  Euro- 
pean mice  in  23  per  cent,  and  into  a  second  strain  of  European  mice  in  3  per 
cent  of  the  animals.  However,  in  the  early  period  following  transplantation 
the  tumors  grew  as  well  in  European  as  in  American  mice,  namely,  in  85  to 
95  per  cent  in  both ;  but  after  twelve  days  a  large  proportion  of  the  tumors 
became  stationary  and  retrogressed  in  the  European  mice,  while  in  the  Ameri- 
can mice  the  proportion  of  retrogressing  tumors  was  small.  In  the  ¥1  hybrids 
between  American  and  European  mice  the  tumor  grew  as  well  or  almost  as 
well  as  in  the  American  mice ;  but  in  the  F2  and  F3  generations  there  was  a 
sharp  fall  in  takes,  which  was  followed  again  by  a  rise  in  the  F4  and  F5 
hybrids.  Except  for  the  partial  recovery  in  F4  and  F5  and  the  results  in  back- 
crossing,  our  results  and  Tyzzer's  were  therefore  similar.  We  concluded  that 
these  findings  were  compatible  with  Mendelian  principles  if  we  assumed  that 
the  susceptibility  for  growth  in  Tyzzer's,  as  well  as  in  our  experiments,  de- 
pended on  multiple  factors.  In  this  connection  we  applied  the  term  multiple 
factors  in  the  usual  sense  of  the  Mendelian  theory,  and  in  the  same  way  in 
which  we  applied  this  term  in  our  transplantations  of  normal  tissues  and  in 
our  analysis  of  the  origin  of  tumors.  In  this  sense  we  also  explained  subse- 
quently the  difference  in  the  results  obtained  between  transplantations  of  nor- 
mal tissues  from  children  to  parents  and  in  reciprocal  transplantations  from 
parents  to  children.  In  the  former  case,  the  number  of  genes  which  are  present 
in  the  transplant  but  not  in  the  host,  should,  on  the  average,  be  greater,  and,  on 
the  average,  the  reaction  should  accordingly  be  more  severe  than  in  the 
reciprocal  transplantations.* 

In  continuation  of  our  experiments  (1916),  we  extended  our  study  to  a 
number  of  other  strains  of  mice.  Again  we  found  that  American  and  various 
imported  strains  did  not  differ  in  respect  to  the  number  of  original  takes,  but 
that  they  differed  greatly  in  regard  to  the  number  of  subsequent  retrogres- 
sions. No  marked  individual  differences  in  the  growth  energy  could  be  estab- 
lished by  the  standards  used  at  that  time,  either  in  that  group  of  mice  in  which 
the  tumor  grew  definitely,  or  in  the  other  group  in  which  it  retrogressed. 
However,  the  marked  differences  which  we  had  observed  formerly  in  the 
number  of  takes  or  growth  energy  between  different  hybrid  generations  were 
no  longer  found ;  the  growth  throughout  was  about  intermediate  between  that 
observed  in  the  American  and  in  the  imported  strains.  Likewise,  in  hybrids 

*  In  a  paper  by  the  writer  on  "The  individuality  differential  and  its  mode  of  inherit- 
ance," in  the  American  Naturalist,  Vol.  IV,  Jan.-Feb.  1920,  there  occurs  in  the  last 
paragraph  of  page  58,  the  sentence :  "In  the  case  of  transplantation  from  child  to  mother, 
on  the  other  hand,  the  graft  would  lack  one-half  the  chromosomes — ."  It  is  quite  evident 
that  this  is  a  misprint  and  that  instead  of  "graft"  it  should  read  "host."  This  correction 
is  made  here,  because  this  misprint  has  led  to  an  erroneous  interpretation  of  the  views 
of  the  writer. 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      369 

between  American  white  and  gray  wild  mice  the  differences  between  successive 
generations  noted  in  our  first  series  did  not  occur. 

Subsequently  Tyzzer  and  Little,  and  Little  and  Tyzer,  found  that  a  Japa- 
nese mouse  sarcoma,  as  well  as  a  carcinoma,  grew  in  Fx  hybrids  between 
Japanese  and  white  mice  as  well  as  in  pure  Japanese  mice,  whereas  in  white 
mice  the  tumors  grew  in  only  a  small  minority  of  the  animals.  The  growth 
of  carcinoma  and  sarcoma  behaved  in  these  respects  almost  alike,  but  the 
growth  of  sarcoma  was  somewhat  better.  Also,  Tyzzer  and  Little  interpreted 
now,  these  variations  in  the  percentage  of  takes  in  different  generations  of 
hybrids  as  due  to  the  action  of  multiple  factors.  They  assumed  that  the  con- 
tinued growth  of  both  the  sarcoma  and  carcinoma  depended  upon  the  presence 
of  a  complex  of  independently  inherited  factors,  and  this  factor-complex  was 
supposed  to  be  present  in  a  nearly  homozygous  condition  in  the  Japanese 
waltzing  mice.  Since  Fx  hybrids  had  Japanese  mice  as  one  of  their  parents, 
they  possessed  the  factors  comprising  the  Japanese  complex  in  a  single  dose, 
and  since  this  single  dose  allowed  tumors  to  grow,  it  followed  that  a  single 
representation  of  these  factors  was  all  that  was  required  for  the  establishment 
of  susceptibility  to  tumor  implantation.  Also,  in  his  more  recent  investigations 
Little  assumed  that  the  transplant  must  have  double  representation  and  the 
host  single  representation  of  the  genes  required  for  continuous  growth  of  the 
grafted  tumor.  It  was  furthermore  necessary  to  hold  that  inasmuch  as  there 
was  associated  with  the  single  complex  of  genes  inducing  susceptibility  a  set 
of  unlike  genes  in  the  host,  the  set  of  genes  determining  susceptibility  was 
dominant  over  the  other  set.  Susceptibility  was  therefore  supposed  to  be 
dominant  over  non-susceptibility  or  resistance  to  the  growth  of  transplanted 
tumors.  In  addition,  Tyzzer  and  Little  assumed  that  the  percentage  of  in- 
dividuals in  which  the  tumor  grew  in  the  F2  generation  could  be  used  as  an 
index  of  the  number  of  factors  necessary  for  continued  growth.  The  larger 
the  number  of  F2  hybrids  in  which  the  tumor  takes,  the  fewer  the  number  of 
genetic  factors  required.  For  instance,  these  authors  concluded  that  twelve 
factors  were  necessary  in  the  case  of  a  carcinoma,  and  from  five  to  seven  in 
the  case  of  a  more  readily  growing  sarcoma. 

In  subsequent  investigations  into  the  transplantability  of  tumors,  Little  and 
Strong  made  use  of  strains  which  had  been  rendered  more  or  less  homogene- 
ous (homozygous)  by  means  of  long-continued  sister-brother  inbreeding.  In 
transplanting  a  melanotic  tumor,  which  originated  in  strain  dba,  into  hybrids 
between  dba  and  A,  Spangler,  Murray  and  Little  noted  that  transplantations 
succeeded  in  a  larger  percentage  in  colored  than  in  albino  hosts,  and  they 
assumed  that  one  "susceptibility  factor"  is  required  for  a  successful  trans- 
plantation in  colored  mice,  while  in  albino  mice  there  is  needed,  in  addition,  a 
second  factor,  which  would  be  necessary  also  for  melanin  production  in  non- 
colored  individuals  but  would  function  in  this  way  only  in  the  presence  of  the 
color  factor.  The  use  of  closely  inbred  strains  meant,  in  certain  respects,  a 
great  simplification  of  the  analysis  of  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors  and 
led  to  the  establishment  of  some  important  facts  in  a  more  definite  manner 
than  had  been  previously  possible.  To  mention  only  one  example :  Bittner,  by 


370  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

means  of  this  method,  could  show  that  if  multiple  inoculations  of  pieces  from 
the  same  tumor  were  made  into  different  individuals  belonging  to  such  a 
closely  inbred  strain,  almost  all  of  the  inoculated  pieces  behaved  alike  in 
the  same  individual.  Thus  there  was  proved  definitely  the  view  the  writer 
had  expressed  previously  (1902),  that  all  transplants  from  the  same  donor 
into  the  same  host  should  elicit  about  the  same  reaction  in  the  latter,  the  re- 
actions depending,  as  we  expressed  it  subsequently,  on  the  relations  of  the 
individually  differentials  of  host  and  transplants.  Bittner  furthermore  found 
that  if  a  closely  inbred  strain  is  used,  the  growth  rhythms,  described  by  Bash- 
ford  as  inherent  in  the  character  of  tumor  cells,  do  not  occur.  This  agreed 
with  the  findings  of  Fleisher,  who  also  had  arrived  at  the  conclusion  that 
such  rhythms  do  not  exist. 

Little,  L.  C.  Strong,  Bittner  and  Cloudman,  noted  that  if  a  tumor  originates 
in  one  of  the  inbred  parent  strains,  it  can  be  transplanted  into  all  the  individ- 
uals of  this  strain,  but  not,  as  a  rule,  into  the  individuals  of  another  inbred 
strain.  These  observations  are  in  agreement  with  the  theory  of  the  organismal 
differentials  and  accord  with  the  earlier  data  established  in  experiments  in 
which  less  closely  inbred  strains  had  been  used.  If  two  inbred  strains  are 
hybridized,  a  tumor  which  had  developed  in  an  animal  belonging  to  one  of 
the  two  parent  strains  grows  well  in  all  or  almost  all  of  the  F1  hybrids,  while 
in  the  F2  hybrids  only  a  certain  percentage  of  individuals  is  susceptible  to  the 
growth  of  the  transplants  in  accordance  with  the  rules  of  Mendelian  segrega- 
tion, and  as  mentioned  above,  this  percentage  figure,  according  to  these  in- 
vestigators, can  be  used  as  an  indicator  of  the  number  of  factors  which  must 
be  present  in  the  hosts  if  the  tumor  shall  take.  The  percentage  of  successful 
transplantations  of  the  tumor  into  backcrosses  between  F1  hybrids  and  each  of 
the  two  parent  strains  indicates  how  many  of  the  required  growth  factors  in 
the  hybrids  have  been  contributed  by  each  one  of  the  two  parent  strains.  As 
should  be  expected,  according  to  the  theory  of  the  organismal  differentials, 
a  tumor  which  originates  in  an  Fx  hybrid  takes  readily  in  all  the  F1  hybrids, 
but  not  at  all  or  very  poorly  in  the  parent  strains,  and  it  grows  in  a  certain 
percentage  of  mice  of  the  F2  generation ;  this  observation  is  also  in  agreement 
with  the  finding  of  Tyzzer  that  a  tumor  originating  in  a  hybrid  Fx  between 
Japanese  and  white  mice,  could  not  be  transplanted  into  either  of  the  parent 
strains.  Strong  compared  the  growth  of  two  adenocarcinomata  developing  in 
two  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  inbred  strain  of  mice.  Because  of  the 
close  inbreeding  of  this  strain,  we  should  have  expected  the  tissues  of  the  two 
adenomata  to  possess  approximately  the  same  individuality  differentials; 
but  Strong  found  that  these  two  tumors  behaved  in  a  different  way  after  in- 
oculation into  F2  generations  of  hybrids  between  a  strain  of  mice  which  was 
susceptible  to  the  tumors  and  another  strain  which  was  non-susceptible.  There- 
fore he  concluded  that  the  two  tumors,  although  they  had  developed  in  in- 
dividuals which  should  be  expected  to  be  genetically  identical,  differed  from 
each  other  in  their  genetic  constitution,  and  further,  that  two  tumors  struc- 
turally indistinguishable  from  each  other  may  differ  in  their  physiological 
behavior,  an  observation  which  in  certain  respects  agrees  with  our  own  that 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      371 

several  spontaneous  sarcomata  which  developed  in  the  thyroids  of  different 
rats,  differed  very  much  in  their  behavior  after  inoculation  into  other  rats, 
although  these  tumors  were  very  much  alike  in  their  structure. 

Continuing  these  experiments,  Strong,  as  well  as  Bittner,  studied  two 
tumors  which  developed  spontaneously  in  the  same  mouse  of  an  inbred 
strain.  These  two  tumors  likewise  were  found  to  behave  differently  after 
transplantation  into  the  same  and  into  other  inbred  strains  and  into  differ- 
ent generations  of  hybrids,  and  it  was  therefore  believed  that  they  differed  in 
the  number  of  genetic  factors  required  for  their  continued  growth  in  a  strange 
host.  Also,  Cloudman,  who  transplanted  three  tumors  originating  in  a  mouse 
of  the  inbred  A  strain,  and  Bittner,  who  compared  the  growth  of  multiple 
tumors  which  developed  spontaneously  in  an  Fx  hybrid  between  the  A  and  D 
strains,  obtained  similar  results  when  the  individual  tumors  were  transplanted 
into  A  and  D  strains  and  into  the  different  hybrid  generations  between  A  and 
D.  But,  although  one  of  Strong's  tumors  grew  in  a  larger  number  of  individ- 
uals belonging  to  another  strain  and  in  hybrids  between  its  own  and  the  strange 
strains,  otherwise  the  two  tumors  behaved  in  a  parallel  way  as  far  as  the  rela- 
tive percentages  of  their  takes  in  these  different  kinds  of  mice  were  con- 
cerned. Both  tumors  were  also  affected  in  the  same  way  by  sex  differences  of 
the  hosts  after  transplantation  into  Fx  ^hybrids,  the  females  being  the  more 
favorable  hosts. 

Previously,  Little  had  assumed  that  in  female  mice  at  the  time  of  sexual 
maturity  a  change  in  the  receptiveness  to  transplants  occurs.  He  attributed  the 
difference  which  he  observed  in  the  percentage  of  takes  in  newborn  female 
mice  and  in  mice  three  weeks  old,  to  the  sexual  maturity  which  takes  place 
during  this  period  and  to  corresponding  changes  in  the  individuality  differ- 
entials ;  this  would  represent  a  linkage  between  susceptibility  and  sex  factors. 
But  only  in  certain  hybrid  strains  did  the  number  of  takes  increase  at  the  time 
of  sexual  maturity,  while  in  the  white  and  dilute  brown  parent-strains  the  re- 
verse relation  was  noted.  Furthermore,  the  differences  between  these  age 
classes  with  which  Little  dealt  were  only  slight. 

More  recently  Bittner  described  another  case  of  what  he  interpreted  as 
linkage,  namely,  one  between  the  factors  determining  transplantability  of  a 
certain  tumor  and  the  color  of  the  skin ;  but  in  this  case  also,  the  differences 
in  the  percentage  of  takes  in  different  groups  of  white  mice  differing  in  their 
hair  color  were  slight.  As  to  the  effect  of  sex  on  transplantability  of  tumors,  it 
is  conceivable  that  sex  hormones  may,  under  exceptional  conditions,  favor  the 
growth  of  certain  mammary  gland  carcinomata  in  the  same  way  as,  in  accord- 
ance with  our  previous  observations,  they  may  do  in  benign  tumors  of  the 
mammary  gland;  however,  such  an  action  is  not  likely  to  affect  fully  devel- 
oped carcinomas ;  they  no  longer  respond,  as  a  rule,  to  hormones.  We,  as  well 
as  Strong,  Cloudman  and  Bittner,  assumed  that  differences  in  the  percentages 
of  takes  of  tumors  originating  in  the  same  animal,  in  hosts  with  a  similar 
genetic  constitution,  depend  upon  differences  in  the  characteristics  of  these 
tumors,  but  we  do  not  agree  in  our  interpretation  as  to  the  nature  of  such 
differences. 


372  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Before  attempting  to  evaluate  the  results  of  these  investigations,  we  may 
consider  some  earlier  findings  of  a  related  nature.  The  study  of  multiple 
spontaneous  tumors  developing  in  the  same  individual  was  begun  as  early  as 
1907,  when  the  writer,  working  with  mice,  noted  that  the  structure  of  multiple 
carcinomata  originating  in  the  same  animal  was  very  similar,  although  not 
identical.  At  that  time  we  suggested  that  it  might  be  possible  through  trans- 
plantation of  such  tumors  to  determine  whether  the  characteristic  behavior 
of  different  carcinomata  in  strange  hosts  was  due  to  factors  inherent  in  the 
tumors  or  in  the  hosts.  Woglom  (1919),  who  had  carried  out  such  transplanta- 
tions, found  that  the  large  majority  of  multiple  tumors  arising  spontaneously 
in  the  same  animal,  behaved  similarly  after  transplantation  into  the  same 
strain  of  mice,  but  in  a  minority  of  cases  differences  did  occur.  Especially 
striking  in  this  respect  was  the  transplantation  of  three  spontaneous  tumors 
which  had  developed  in  the  same  mouse.  One  of  these  was  readily  trans- 
plantable into  other  mice,  while  the  other  two  retrogressed  following  a  tem- 
porary period  of  growth,  and  one  tumor  retrogressed  more  readily  than  the 
other.  However,  in  these  experiments  Woglom  wished  to  determine  whether 
the  behavior  of  tumors  after  transplantation  depended  upon  adaptation  of  the 
tumors  to  the  environment  as  it  existed  in  the  animal  in  which  they  had 
originated,  or  whether  it  depended  upon  the  growth  energy  of  the  tumor 
at  the  time  of  transplantation.  In  the  former  case  all  the  transplants  should 
behave  in  a  similar  manner,  since  all  these  tumor  cells  had  been  reared  in 
the  same  environment,  while  in  the  latter  case  the  tumors  should  behave 
differently  from  one  another  because  the  growth  energy  is  a  variable  factor, 
which,  according  to  Bashford,  differs  at  different  times  even  in  the  same  tumor. 

The  basic  assumption  underlying  the  interpretation  of  Strong  and  his  col- 
laborators is  that  the  difference  in  the  behavior  of  two  tumors  arising  spon- 
taneously in  the  same  mouse  is  due  to  differences  in  the  mutations  of  genes 
in  somatic  cells  and,  therefore,  to  the  differences  in  the  gene  sets  of  these 
two  tumors  resulting  from  these  mutations.  But  this,  it  seems,  is  not  the 
only  possible  interpretation  of  this  finding.  We  know  that  various  normal 
and  also  embryonal  tissues  show  different  degrees  of  transplantability ;  thus, 
cartilage  may  be  homoiotransplanted  successfully  in  cases  in  which  thyroid 
cannot,  although  both  tissues  can  be  autotransplanted  equally  well.  These  two 
tissues,  when  taken  from  the  same  individual,  possess  the  same  individuality 
differential  but  differ  in  the  constitution  of  their  organ  and  tissue  differentials, 
and  this  latter  difference  may  cause  variations  in  their  sensitiveness  and  trans- 
plantability. We  also  know  that  normal  tissues  differ  much  in  the  growth 
momentum  which  they  possess ;  for  instance,  the  normal  and  sensitized  uterine 
mucosa  may  exhibit  quite  a  different  degree  of  proliferative  activity  after 
homoiotransplantation.  Now,  if  we  assume  that  during  the  transformation 
of  normal  tissues  into  cancerous  tissues  a  graded  increase  in  growth  energy 
occurs  and  a  concomitant  change  takes  place  also  in  the  resistance  to  the 
injurious  effects  of  transplantation,  and  if  we  furthermore  assume  that  in 
two  tumors,  developing  spontaneously  in  the  same  individual,  this  transfor- 
mation has  progressed  to  a  different  degree,  then  we  could  explain  the  ob- 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      373 

servations  of  Strong  without  having  recourse  to  the  assumption  of  different 
genetic  mutations  in  different  somatic  cells  of  the  same  individual. 

However,  there  are  certain  other  conditions  which  may  correctly  be  at- 
tributed to  genetic  conditions.  Thus  Strong  and  Bittner  observed  in  the  course 
of  their  transplantations  that  in  the  closely  inbred  strain,  "dilute  brown," 
a  change  suddenly  took  place  in  the  transplantability  of  a  certain  tumor  and 
they  attributed  this  change  to  a  selection  within  the  larger  strain  of  a  certain 
substrain  or  family,  which  thus  evidently  differed  in  genetic  composition 
from  that  of  the  main  strain.  This  agrees  with  our  previous  observations, 
in  which  we  had  found  a  similar  change  in  the  transplantability  of  tumors  and 
also  in  the  percentage  of  spontaneous  tumors  developing  in  a  strain  of  mice, 
due  to  the  splitting  off  of  certain  families  possessing  a  somewhat  different 
genetic  composition. 

From  our  findings  after  transplantations  of  normal  tissues  and  of  several 
tumors,  we  concluded  that  in  a  general  way  the  outcome  of  transplantation 
depends  upon  the  relation  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant;  and  this  means  that  it  depends,  essentially,  upon  the  genetic  con- 
stitution of  the  tumor  cells  as  well  as  of  the  host  cells,  and  that  the  reaction  of 
the  latter  takes  place  in  response  to  the  strange  genes  carried  by  the  transplant. 
In  the  strict  sense  the  reaction  does  not,  however,  occur  against  the  genes  as 
such,  but  against  certain  physiological  and  biochemical  mechanisms  developing 
in  transplant  and  host  on  a  genetic  basis.  Strong  expressed  more  recently  the 
same  idea  that  the  result  of  tumor  transplantation  is  a  function  of  the  genetic 
composition  of  both  host  and  transplant.  In  this  respect,  then,  the  various 
investigators  are  in  agreement. 

There  still  remains  to  be  discussed  the  relation  between  the  hereditary  pre- 
disposition to  cancer  and  the  change  which  takes  place  in  normal  cells  during 
their  transformation  into  cancer  cells.  These  two  conditions  are  distinct  from 
each  other.  A  comparison  between  the  transplantation  of  normal  tissues  and 
of  tumors  which  arise  from  normal  tissues  makes  possible  an  analysis  of  the 
constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  both,  and  we  studied  tumor 
transplantation  largely  from  this  point  of  view.  Tyzzer,  on  the  other  hand, 
in  common  with  Ehrlich,  and  also  to  some  extent  in  common  with  Bashford, 
considered  tumors  as  essentially  different  from  ordinary  tissues,  as  an  abnormal 
condition  which  called  forth  an  immunity  peculiar  to  cancer,  although  certain 
exceptions  to  this  rule  were  admitted.  Thus  Tyzzer  assumed  that  the  genetic 
study  underlying  transplantation  of  tumors  might  furnish  an  insight  into  the 
character  of  cancer  and  into  the  conditions  which  cause  its  development.  Simi- 
larly, Little,  Strong  and  Bittner  infer  a  similar  connection  between  the 
hereditary  factors  determining  transplantability  of  tumors  and  the  origin  of 
tumors,  and  in  this  sense,  Bittner  intimates  that  the  same  dominant  multiple 
factors  which  determine  the  transplantability  of  tumors  may  determine,  also, 
the  origin  of  cancer. 

We  shall  now  attempt  to  analyse  still  further  the  various  data  which  we 
have  discussed,  and  to  determine,  if  possible,  the  significance  of  genes  in  the 
transplantation  of  tumors.  For  this  purpose  it  will  first  be  necessary  to  consider 


374  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

again  the  principal  factors  which  may  enter  into  the  transplantation  of  normal 
tissues  and  of  tumors.  There  is  (1)  the  relation  between  the  individuality  dif- 
ferentials or  species  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  This,  as  we  have 
seen,  plays  a  role  in  cancers  as  well  as  in  normal  tissues,  numerous  data 
confirming  such  a  conclusion.  (2)  Variable  factors  relating  to  the  mode  of 
inoculation  or  transplantation  may  greatly  influence  the  number  of  successful 
transplantations ;  these  are  non-genetic  in  nature.  To  mention  an  example  : 
the  usual  figures  for  takes  relate  to  experiments  in  which  the  transplant  is 
placed  into  the  subcutaneous  tissue.  Intracutaneous  or  intraperitoneal  in- 
oculation may  alter  these  figures  considerably.  As  we  have  seen,  transplanta- 
tion into  the  brain,  and  especially  into  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  may 
make  possible  a  tumor  growth,  which  would  not  take  place  after  subcutaneous 
transplantation.  And,  as  various  investigators  have  shown,  even  heterogenous 
cancers  may  grow  in  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  or  in  the  anterior  cham- 
ber of  the  eye.  Likewise,  the  amount  of  material  inoculated  is  of  importance. 
In  many  instances,  transplantation  of  a  larger  quantity  increases  the  number 
of  successful  transplantations.  But  if  the  quantity  exceeds  a  certain  optimum, 
the  number  of  definite  takes  may  decrease  again  in  certain  cases,  because 
the  added  tissue  may  increase  the  amount  of  material  which  may  serve  as 
antigen  and  call  forth  the  production  of  injurious  immune  substances.  Also, 
in  the  case  of  mouse  leukemia  the  quantity  of  injected  leukemic  cells  helps  to 
determine  the  result.  While,  as  Furth  has  shown,  a  single  leukemic  cell  may 
be  able  to  transfer  the  new  formation  to  another  host,  on  the  whole,  prospects 
of  a  successful  transplantation  are  greater  and  this  tumor-like  condition  de- 
velops and  kills  the  inoculated  mouse  more  rapidly  if  the  number  of  inoculated 
cells  is  greater.  Also  experimentally  it  is  possible  to  diminish  the  virulence  or 
growth  energy  of  tumor  cells  by  the  application  of  various  physical  and 
chemical  agents.  (3)  Certain  extraneous,  non-genetic  factors  which  alter  the 
susceptibility  or  the  power  of  resistance  of  the  host  tissue  to  transplanted 
material.  Application  of  X-rays,  injection  of  colloidal  dyes  or  other  material, 
may  diminish  the  resistance  of  the  host,  presumably  by  affecting  the  reticulo- 
endothelial system.  There  is  good  reason  for  assuming  that  also  without  the 
use  of  these  experimental  means,  differences  exist  in  different  individuals 
and  strains  in  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  against  transplants  bearing  a  dif- 
ferent organismal  differential.  (4)  Differences  in  the  resistance  of  different 
tissues,  of  which  the  tumors  are  composed,  to  injurious  influences  which  may 
prevail  in  the  host.  These  differences  we  have  found  in  normal  tissues,  such  as 
thyroid  and  cartilage,  and  there  is  evidence  that  they  exist  also  in  tumors.  Thus 
the  malignant  chondroma  of  a  mouse  observed  by  Ehrlich  could  readily  be 
transplanted  into  other  mice,  irrespective  of  their  genetic  constitution.  The 
tumor  grew  slowly  but  was  able  to  resist  unfavorable  conditions.  When  a 
piece  of  cartilage  becomes  permanently  endowed  with  greater  growth  energy 
and  thus  assumes  the  characteristics  of  a  tumor,  it  still  retains  some  of  the 
essential  characteristics  of  cartilage,  such  as  its  relatively  great  resistance  to 
the  action  of  injurious  body  fluids  and  antagonistic  cells.  On  the  other  hand, 
if  thyroid  becomes  endowed  with  great  growth  potentiality,  it  likewise  still 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      375 

retains  some  of  the  essential  characteristics  of  thyroid  tissue  and  is,  therefore, 
more  susceptible  to  injurious  influences.  There  is  good  reason  for  assuming 
that  different  tissues,  such  as  cartilage  and  thyroid,  and  cancers  derived  from 
them  which  develop  in  the  same  host,  possess  the  same  genetic  constitution 
and  the  same  individuality  differential,  and  that  differences  which  such  tissues 
and  cancers  show,  are  therefore,  in  all  probability,  directly  non-genetic,  al- 
though ultimately  they  depend  also  on  the  constitution  of  the  germinal  gene 
sets.  (5)  There  are  certain  factors  of  an  environmental  nature  which  may 
also,  under  some  conditions,  influence  the  number  of  successful  transplanta- 
tions. Severe  undernourishment  may  diminish  it ;  hormones  may  affect  the 
transplantability.  Thus  according  to  the  recent  experiments  of  Gross,  trans- 
plantation of  a  mouse  sarcoma  succeeded  more  readily  in  sexually  mature 
male  than  in  female  mice.  He  could  make  it  very  probable  that  the  ovary  gives 
off  a  substance,  presumably  a  hormone,  which  had  this  inhibiting  effect  on  the 
growth  of  the  transplanted  tumor.  This  is  of  importance,  because  it  has  been 
taken  for  granted  by  some  investigators  that  slight  differences  in  the  effect  of 
sex  on  the  number  of  takes  observed  at  a  certain  time  of  life  were  of  genetic 
origin.  However,  it  must  be  noted  that  Gross  carried  out  intracutaneous  trans- 
plantations and  that  under  these  conditions  the  existence  of  the  tumors  is  a 
very  labile  and  rather  precarious  one,  in  which  slight  interferences,  which  in 
transplants  growing  under  more  favorable  conditions  would  hardly  be  notice- 
able, may  affect  quite  definitely  the  fate  of  the  tumor.  The  effect  of  the  hor- 
mone in  this  case  is  presumably  an  indirect  one.  (6)  Other  intrinsic  factors 
such  as  growth  momentum,  immunizing  power,  and  adaptability  of  tissue  to 
the  condition  of  the  host,  all  of  which  are  greater  in  tumors  than  in  normal 
tissues. 

As  far  as  the  growth  momentum  is  concerned,  its  constant  increase  in 
cancer  tissue  over  that  in  the  normal  tissue  from  which  it  originated,  is  per- 
haps the  most  characteristic  feature  of  tumor  tissue.  This  increase  in  growth 
momentum  makes  it  possible  for  cancer  tissues  to  resist  injurious  influences 
to  which  normal  tissues  would  succumb,  the  rapid  cell  multiplication  probably 
increasing  the  ability  of  the  transplant  to  absorb  and  neutralize  injurious  sub- 
stances circulating  in  the  host.  Associated  with  this  greater  growth  momentum 
there  is  usually  a  diminution  in  differentiation  of  the  cancerous  cells,  which 
may  likewise  diminish  the  sensitiveness  of  the  transplant  to  injurious  factors 
under  certain  circumstances.  However,  the  growth  momentum  is  not  a  sta- 
tionary condition ;  in  a  very  large  number  of  instances  it  has  been  observed 
that  during  the  first  transplantations  of  a  tumor,  whether  a  carcinoma  or  a 
sarcoma,  the  growth  energy  increases.  Such  an  effect  is  typical,  as  we  found 
about  forty  years  ago  in  the  course  of  our  first  transplantations  of  sarcoma  of 
the  thyroid  gland  in  rats,  and  it  has  since  been  noted  by  many  other  investi- 
gators. There  is  no  justification  for  assuming  that  so  regular  an  occurrence, 
which  does  not  depend  upon  a  single  tumor  cell  but  may  be  noted  after 
transplantation  of  various  parts  of  the  tumor,  is  due  to  a  haphazard  somatic 
mutation.  It  is  presumably  due  to  the  stimulation  exerted  by  incisions  into  the 
tumor  and  by  the  process  of  transplantation.  A  similar  stimulation  has  been 


376  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

noted  also  in  the  transfer  of  leukemic  blood  cells  into  other  susceptible  individ- 
uals. In  the  mammary  gland,  where  the  development  of  cancer  out  of  normal 
tissue  under  the  influence  of  hormones  can  be  followed  very  well,  it  can  be 
seen  that,  step  by  step,  the  growth  energy  of  the  tissue  on  which  the  hormone 
acts  increases,  and  that  as  soon  as  a  certain  stage  of  intensity  in  this  stimula- 
tion has  been  reached,  the  transition  into  abnormal  growth  takes  place,  pro- 
vided the  conditions  transmitted  by  the  germ  cells  make  the  gland  tissue 
responsive  to  the  action  of  the  hormones.  Furthermore,  it  is  not  a  single  cell 
which  is  altered,  but  more  complex  structural  units,  the  acini  and  ducts 
of  the  mammary  gland,  undergo  this  cancerous  change ;  and  the  latter  does  not 
depend  upon  the  amount  of  newly  formed  tissue,  but  on  the  intensity  of  the 
growth  stimulation  which  the  gland  structures  have  undergone.  There  is, 
thus,  no  indication  that  this  process  is  caused  by  the  occurrence  of  somatic 
mutations  and  that  the  cancer-producing  stimuli  in  general  are  effective  be- 
cause the  right  kind  of  somatic  mutations  are  produced.  Although,  therefore, 
the  facts  do  not  warrant  the  conclusion  that  this  process  of  stimulation  acts 
by  way  of  the  genes,  on  the  other  hand,  the  conditions  which  determine  the 
degree  of  responsiveness  of  the  tissues  to  the  stimuli  are  transmitted  by  genes, 
but  by  genes  of  the  germ  cells  and  not  of  somatic  cells.  Eisen  found  that  in  the 
course  of  serial  transplantations  of  a  mammary  carcinoma,  which  arose  spon- 
taneously in  a  rat  belonging  to  a  closely  inbred  strain,  noticeable  variations 
in  the  growth  energy  were  lacking  in  the  different  generations  of  transplants ; 
he  attributes  the  constancy  in  the  slow  growth  rate  in  the  course  of  serial 
transplantations  to  the  homozygous  constitution  of  this  strain  and  believes 
that  when  an  increase  in  growth  energy  is  noted  in  the  course  of  the  first 
generations  of  grafts,  this  is  due  to  differences  in  the  genetic  constitution  of 
different  members  of  the  strain.  However,  it  can  be  shown  that  this  increase 
in  growth  energy  has  in  many  cases  been  observed  also  in  closely  inbred 
strains.  It  is  certain  that  this  phenomenon  is  not  due  to  selective  processes  in 
an  impure  strain  of  animals.  But  it  is  not  observed  in  the  case  of  all  the 
tumors;  to  some  extent,  it  seems  to  depend  upon  differences  in  the  stability 
of  the  tumors  used  for  serial  transplantations. 

As  already  stated,  the  primary  condition  required  for  the  development  of 
malignant  tumors  is  an  augmented  growth  momentum,  and  this  augmentation 
may  continue  to  take  place  in  the  course  of  transplantations  of  the  cancerous 
tissue ;  it  is  one  of  the  principal  causes  for  the  additional  number  of  successful 
transplantations  or  "takes"  which  may  take  place  during  serial  transplanta- 
tion, and  which  accompanies  the  increase  in  growth  momentum.  But,  omitting 
here  from  consideration,  differences  in  the  receptiveness  of  the  host  for  the 
transplant,  there  are  still  other  variable  factors  involved  in  the  number  of 
takes,  which  are  situated  in  the  tumor  cells;  among  such  factors  we  have 
referred  above  to  differences  in  the  resistance  of  the  tissues  to  injurious  condi- 
tions, which  is  likewise  not  directly  genetic  in  character;  and  a  third  factor 
consists  in  the  changes  of  an  adaptive  nature  which  can  be  seen  sometimes 
after  continued  transplantation  of  tumors,  changes  which  also  occur  after 
successive  inoculations  of  bacteria  and  after  longer  continued  exposure  of 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      377 

certain  protozoa  to  various  injurious  conditions.  In  all  these  cases  we  may 
perhaps  have  to  deal  with  alterations  in  cytoplasmic  or  nuclear-cytoplasmic 
mechanisms  corresponding  to  the  persisting  modifications  of  Jollos  ("Dauer 
modifikationen").  Such  processes  of  adaptation  have  been  observed  under 
various  circumstances;  for  instance,  leukemic  cells,  which  at  first  could  be 
transferred  only  to  X-rayed  individuals  belonging  to  an  unfavorable  strain 
of  mice,  could  subsequently  be  transferred,  also,  to  other  individuals  belong- 
ing to  the  unfavorable  strain  which  had  not  previously  been  X-rayed.  We 
shall  discuss  these  processes  of  adaptation  more  fully  in  the  next  chapter. 

In  accordance  with  this  interpretation  of  apparently  spontaneous  changes  in 
growth  momentum  and  takes  which,  as  a  rule,  occur  in  the  course  of  serial 
transplantations  of  cancerous  tissues,  we  may  likewise  interpret  the  differ- 
ences in  growth  momentum  and  transplantability  which  have  been  observed 
between  spontaneous  tumors  originating  in  different  mice  of  the  same  inbred 
strains,  or  even  in  the  same  mouse,  and  which  we  have  already  mentioned 
in  this  chapter.  It  should  be  expected  that  some  differences  may  develop  during 
the  process  of  cancerization  of  normal  tissues.  This  process  may  be  somewhat 
farther  advanced  in  some  beginning  tumors  than  in  others,  and  there  is  no 
reason  for  attributing  such  differences  to  somatic  mutations.  Changes  of  the 
opposite  kind  take  place  during  embryonal  development ;  here,  associated  with 
a  greater  differentiation  of  the  tissues,  a  gradual  diminution  in  growth  mo- 
mentum and,  correspondingly,  in  transplantability  occurs;  and  these  changes 
taking  place  during  embryonal  life  are  irreversible.  Bat  they  are  not  due  to  a 
series  of  successive  somatic  mutations ;  nor  should  we  be  justified  in  attribut- 
ing typical  changes  in  growth  and  differentiation  in  the  granulosa  of  follicles, 
previous  to  and  during  the  process  of  maturation  and  corpus  luteum  forma- 
tion, to  a  continuous  series  of  somatic  mutations.  All  these  considerations 
make  it  improbable  that  either  the  transformation  of  normal  tissues  into 
cancers  or  the  variations  in  growth  momentum  and  transplantability  of  fully 
developed  cancers  are  due  to  somatic  mutations.  However,  as  stated,  the 
organismal  differentials,  and  therefore  also  the  genetic  constitution  of  tu- 
mors, are  important  factors  in  their  transplantability,  as  well  as  in  the  produc- 
tion of  immunity  against  tumor  transplants. 

After  transplantation  of  tumors,  as  well  as  after  transplantation  of  em- 
bryonal tissues,  processes  of  immunity  can  be  more  readily  demonstrated  in 
the  host  than  after  transplantation  of  normal  tissues.  We  shall  discuss  these 
processes  of  immunity  in  tumor  transplantation  somewhat  more  in  detail  in 
a  succeeding  chapter.  Here,  it  may  be  stated  merely  that  the  genes  in  the 
piece  of  tumor,  which  are  strange  to  the  host,  are  the  precursors  of  those 
constituents  of  the  organismal  differentials  in  the  tumor,  which  may  function 
as  antigens.  The  difference  between  the  individuality  and  species  differentials 
of  host  and  transplant  not  only  gives  rise  to  the  primary  local  defense  reaction 
of  the  host  against  the  tumor,  but  it  also  subsequently  causes  the  transforma- 
tion of  these  strange  constituents  into  antigens  and  thus  leads  to  the  production 
of  immunity.  It  is  especially  when  a  tumor,  following  a  period  of  growth  in  a 
host,  retrogresses  that  the  host  becomes  immune  against  a  second  transplant 


378  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  the  same  kind  of  tumor,  or  of  a  tumor  resembling  the  first  one,  as  far  as 
the  constitution  of  their  organismal  differentials  is  concerned. 

Gorer  has  observed  that  when  a  transplanted  tumor  has  retrogressed,  hemag- 
glutinins appear  in  the  blood  of  the  host,  which  are  directed  against  the 
erythrocytes  of  the  donor  of  the  tumor.  He  could  show  that  when  certain 
strains  of  mice  and  certain  tumors  were  used,  there  were  several  kinds  of 
hemagglutinogens  present  in  the  red  corpuscles  of  the  donor  of  the  tumor 
which  gave  rise  to  the  formation  of  hemagglutinins,  and  the  number  of  these 
agglutinogens  seemed  to  be  approximately  the  same  as  the  number  of  "sus- 
ceptibility factors"  for  the  growth  of  the  tumors,  as  determined  by  the  propor- 
tion of  takes  in  the  F2  and  backcross  generations  of  hybrids  between  two 
strains  varying  in  their  susceptibility  to  the  tumor,  in  accordance  with  the 
theory  of  Tyzzer  and  Little.  He  concludes,  therefore,  that  it  is  the  hemag- 
glutinogens which  represent  the  genetic  factors  needed  for  the  growth  of  a 
transplanted  tumor.  Lumsden  also  noted  in  rats,  in  which  tumors  had 
retrogressed,  the  presence  of  hemagglutinins  for  the  erythrocytes  of  the  donor 
of  the  tumor.  As  we  shall  see  later,  it  is  unlikely  that  the  number  of  factors 
needed  for  the  growth  of  a  transplanted  tumor  can  be  determined  in  a  valid 
manner  by  the  method  mentioned.  However,  it  is  probable  that  differences  in 
the  constitution  of  the  individuality  or  species  differentials  of  cells  and  tissues 
in  different  individuals  or  species  extend  also  to  the  erythrocytes,  and  that 
here  they  may  be  represented  by  agglutinogens,  and  that  the  constituents  of 
the  individuality  and  species  differentials  in  the  tumor  cells,  which  are  strange 
to  the  host,  give  rise  to  several  kinds  of  immune  substances,  one  of  which 
consists  of  hemagglutinins.  As  stated,  we  believe  that  it  is  the  genes  of  the 
tumor,  which  are  not  represented  in  the  host,  which  are  the  precursors  of 
strange  constituents  of  the  individuality  and  species  differentials  in  the  tumor, 
and  which  thus,  indirectly  acting  through  the  organismal  differentials,  may 
give  origin  to  processes  of  immunity  and  thus  help  to  determine  the  fate  of 
the  transplanted  tumor. 

As  to  the  determination  of  the  "susceptibility  factors"  necessary  for  the 
growth  of  a  tumor  in  a  host  by  counting  the  number  of  takes  in  the  F2  hybrids 
between  a  favorable  and  an  unfavorable  strain,  this  is  in  principle  the  method 
which  is  used  for  establishing  the  number  of  multiple  factors  required  for  the 
appearance  of  a  character  in  an  individual,  in  case  the  father  and  mother 
strain  differ  in  the  number  of  the  genes,  needed  for  this  purpose,  which  they 
contribute  to  the  fertilized  egg.  In  regard  to  the  number  of  "susceptibility  fac- 
tors" found  by  using  this  method  of  determination,  this  differs  in  each  kind 
of  tumor;  by  making  a  sufficiently  large  number  of  assumptions  as  to  the 
number  of  factors  directly  concerned  and  by  having  recourse  to  modifying 
factors,  it  will  be  possible,  approximately,  to  fit  all  ratios  found  in  the  F2 
generation  of  hybrids  into  a  certain  formula;  but  it  is  difficult  to  see  the 
advantages  gained  by  establishing  such  a  formula  applying  only  to  one 
particular  tumor.  However,  the  growth  of  a  tumor  depends  not  only  upon 
certain  genes  in  the  host,,  but,  as  we  have  already  indicated,  various  factors 
of  a  primarily  non-genetic  nature  help  to  determine  the  number  of  successful 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      379 

transplantations  in  the  F2  generation  of  hybrids  between  susceptible  and 
non-susceptible  strains,  such  as  the  different  degrees  of  resistance,  the  growth 
momentum,  and  the  mode  of  inoculation  of  a  tumor.  The  number  of  success- 
ful takes  in  the  F2  generation  depends,  therefore,  not  only  on  the  relations  of 
the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  but  also  on  various  sec- 
ondary factors,  and  the  number  of  takes  in  F2  hybrids  might  be  quite  different 
if  these  secondary  conditions  were  altered.  Moreover,  if  we  use  the  percentage 
of  takes  of  tumors  as  the  criterion  for  the  presence  of  genes  in  the  tumor,  which 
are  compatible  with  those  of  the  host,  we  apply  a  relatively  coarse  standard  of 
measurement.  There  is  no  intergrade  between  take  and  non-take ;  the  tumor 
either  grows  continuously  after  transplantation,  or  it  does  not  grow ;  it  may 
grow  for  a  while,  then  retrogress  and  ultimately  disappear.  But  there  exist 
various  finer  kinds  of  distinction  between  degrees  of  compatibility  or  non- 
compatibility  of  host  and  graft,  such  as  variations  in  growth  energy,  in  the 
length  of  the  latent  period,  and  in  the  number  of  cells  or  size  of  a  piece  of 
tumor  tissue  which  permits  a  successful  transplantation.  If  these  variables 
should  also  be  considered,  the  gradations  in  the  fate  of  tumor  transplants  in  the 
F2  generation  would  be  much  greater,  and  correspondingly,  the  number  of 
factors  which  are  supposed  to  determine  the  compatibility  between  host  and 
transplant  would  likewise  be  found  to  be  much  greater.  By  taking  merely  into 
account  the  proportion  of  the  number  of  takes  to  the  number  of  non-takes  in 
the  F2  generation,  a  threshold  value  is  determined,  namely,  a  slight  excess  or 
deficit  in  the  sum  of  the  large  number  of  variables  which  decide  the  continuous 
growth  or  lack  of  growth  of  the  transplanted  tumor.  Such  a  determination 
is  not  identical  with  the  study  of  the  differences  between  the  individuality 
and  species  differentials  of  host  and  transplant. 

In  transplantation  of  normal  tissues,  much  finer  standards  of  measurement 
are  used  in  the  evaluation  of  the  compatibility  between  host  and  transplant  than 
in  transplantation  of  tumors,  where  the  percentage  of  successful  transplanta- 
tions alone  is  considered,  and  consequently  the  number  of  genetic  factors  on 
which  this  compatibility  depends  has  been  found  to  be  great  in  the  case  of  the 
former. 

Although  the  non-genetic  factors  which  we  have  discussed  play  a  certain 
role  in  the  transplantation  of  cancerous  tissues,  and,  to  a  less  extent,  also  of 
normal  tissues,  still,  in  both  it  is  essentially  the  genes  which  fix  the  con- 
stitution of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  therefore  the  result  of  trans- 
plantation depends  largely  on  the  relation  of  the  individuality  and  species 
differentials  in  transplant  and  host.  We  have  already  referred  to  some  of  the 
essential  facts  which  prove  this  conclusion.  Autotransplantation  succeeds  as  a 
rule,  and  autotransplantation  means  transfer  under  conditions  in  which  the 
individuality  differentials  and  their  precursors,  the  genes,  are  the  same  in 
host  and  graft.  Conditions  might  be  different  if  somatic  mutations  were  char- 
acteristic of  tumors.  In  this  case,  an  incompatibility  might  arise  even  between 
autotransplant  and  host;  but  this  has  not  been  observed.  More  or  less  ap- 
proaching autotransplantation  is  transplantation  into  closely  inbred  strains ; 
but  it  must  again  be  stated  very  definitely  that  even  the  inbred  mouse  strains 


380  THE'  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

D,  C57  and  others  are  not  homozygous;  not  even  the  A  strain,  which  ap- 
proaches homozygosity  more  than  other  strains,  is  completely  homozygous. 
But  such  inbred  strains  come  near  to  this  state  to  a  degree  which  enables 
cancerous  tissues  to  pass  the  threshold  point  which  makes  possible  the  con- 
tinued growth  of  the  transplants  in  other  individuals  of  such  a  strain; 
whereas  in  individuals  of  different  strains  this  threshold  point  has  not  yet 
been  reached.  On  the  other  hand,  normal  tissues  transplanted  within  these 
inbred  strains  quite  frequently  reveal  the  lack  of  a  perfect  identity  between 
the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  Analogous  conditions 
are  found  if  we  compare  transplantations  of  cancerous  and  of  normal  tissues 
from  hybrids  between  two  different  inbred  strains  to  parents,  and  vice  versa, 
in  cases  in  which  the  donors  of  the  transplants  belong  to  one  of  the  two  inbred 
strains.  Tumor  transplants,  owing  to  the  largely  non-genetic  characteristics 
which  they  have  acquired,  are  able  to  pass  the  threshold  point  separating  non- 
growth  from  growth  in  the  new  host,  if  parent  tissue  is  grafted  to  the  hybrids ; 
whereas  normal  tissues,  although  they  also  do  not  evoke  marked  signs  of  in- 
compatibility in  the  hybrids,  still  in  many  instances,  call  forth  some  reactions 
on  the  part  of  the  host  and  may  undergo  a  moderate  degree  of  injury.  How- 
ever, in  transplantations  from  hybrids  to  parents,  tumors  as  a  rule  have  not  yet 
passed  the  point  of  threshold  which  allows  them  to  grow,  while  normal  tissues 
are  injured  in  such  a  host  to  a  higher  degree  than  in  the  reciprocal  transplanta- 
tions, but  because  of  the  use  of  finer  criteria  the  results  are  not  considered, 
to  the  same  degree,  to  be  completely  unfavorable  or  negative  as  they  are  when 
tumors  are  used  in  this  type  of  transplantation.  These  differences  between 
normal  tissues  and  tumors  are  then  not  caused  essentially  by  differences  in 
the  genetic  constitution,  but  either  by  non-genetic  factors,  or  by  the  methods 
applied  in  the  evaluation  of  the  results.  If  we  deal  with  other  strains  which 
have  not  yet  reached  so  high  a  degree  of  homozygosity,  we  should  find  various 
averages  in  the  number  of  takes;  the  less  the  strain  has  been  made  homo- 
zygous by  close  inbreeding,  the  greater  should  be  the  number  of  animals 
which  need  to  be  examined  in  order  to  arrive  at  valid  figures  indicating  the 
connection  existing  between  compatibility  of  tumor  and  host  and  the  genetic 
relationship  between  donor  and  host. 

Additional  data  which  prove  the  significance  of  the  individuality  and  species 
differentials  for  the  successful  transplantation  of  tumors  are  furnished  by 
experiments  in  immunization  against  tumor  grafts.  It  is  possible,  although 
only  to  a  limited  degree,  to  immunize  an  animal  by  a  previous  transplantation 
of  normal,  and  especially  of  embryonal  tissue  or  by  injection  of  red  blood 
cells  against  a  tumor  transplant.  In  order  to  accomplish  such  an  immunization 
against  the  individuality  differential  of  a  tumor,  the  tissue  serving  as  antigen 
must  belong  to  the  same  species  as  the  tumor  to  be  inoculated  subsequently,  but 
it  must  differ  in  the  genes  which  determine  individuality  from  those  of  the 
host.  Such  genes;  which  occur  in  the  antigen  but  not  in  the  host,  give  rise  to  the 
immune  mechanism,  and,  in  all  probability,  to  the  formation  of  antibodies. 
If  antigen  and  host  are  heterogenous  in  their  constitution,  then  the  developing 
immune  mechanisms  are  directed  only  against  heterogenous,  but  not  against 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      381 

homoiogenous  constituents  of  the  antigens.  Correspondingly,  the  immunity 
which  is  found  in  animals  in  which  a  homoiogenous  tumor  has  retrogressed  is 
directed  only  against  the  same  or  against  related  homoiogenous  tumors. 

In  accordance  with  the  theory  that  the  organismal  differentials  are  pri- 
marily responsible  for  the  compatibility  between  tissues,  we  have  assumed  that 
it  is  the  genes,  or  rather  their  derivatives,  in  the  tumors  which  are  strange  to 
the  host  which  call  forth  and  determine  the  intensity  of  the  reactions  of  the 
host  against  the  transplant ;  and  that  the  genes  and  their  derivatives  which  are 
identical  in  host  and  transplant  do  not  enter  into  these  reactions,  or  do  so 
only  to  a  slight  degree.  We  thus  define  in  a  more  exact  manner  the  cause  of 
the  reactions  between  host  and  graft.  According  to  the  terms  of  Mendelian 
heredity,  the  genes,  which  differ  in  host  and  transplant,  are  dominant  over 
the  genes  which  are  identical,  the  latter  being  recessive,  although  as  we  have 
seen  in  our  discussion  of  the  transplantation  of  normal  tissues,  there  is  the 
possibility  that  also  the  latter  may  exert  a  certain  effect. 

In  agreement  with  the  interpretation  given  here  are  the  results  which  Eisen 
and  Woglom  obtained  in  immunizing  rats  against  the  growth  of  a  trans- 
planted mammary  gland  adenocarcinoma,  which  had  developed  in  a  rat  be- 
longing to  the  inbred  August  strain;  this  strain  was  the  offspring  of  a  cross 
between  two  inbred  strains  (990  and  1561).  The  mammary  gland  tumor  could 
be  transplanted  successfully  into  100%  of  the  August  strain  rats  and  into 
78%  of  the  990  strain  rats.  Previous  inoculation  of  embryo  skin  derived 
from  August  strain  rats  was  not  able  to  immunize  August  strain  rats;  nor 
was  it  possible  to  immunize  990  rats  against  the  growth  of  the  adenocarcinoma 
by  means  of  strain  990  embryo  skin ;  but  embryo  skin  of  August  strain  rats 
was  very  effective  in  immunizing  animals  belonging  to  strain  990.  This  is  a 
good  illustration  of  the  fact  that  it  is  the  strange  genes  which  make  possible 
the  development  of  efficient  antigens,  and  that  it  is  the  degree  of  strangeness 
of  the  individuality  differentials  in  host  and  transplant  which  determines 
the  degree  of  the  antigenic  effectiveness  of  the  normal  tissues  or  tumors. 

Another  difference  between  normal  tissues  and  tumors  or  tumor-like  tissues 
has  been  noted  by  Furth  in  his  experiments  concerning  the  transmission  of 
leukemia  in  mice.  He  observed  that  in  certain  inbred  strains  a  large  propor- 
tion of  the  animals  become  affected  by  this  disease.  If  leucocytes  from  a 
leukemic  mouse  were  injected  into  other  normal  mice  of  this  inbred  strain, 
leukemia  developed  in  all  the  animals,  but  leukemia  could  not  be  transferred 
to  another  strain  in  which  spontaneous  leukemia  did  not  occur  or  was  rare ;  it 
developed  in  100%  of  Fx  hybrids  between  these  two  strains  which  had  been 
inoculated  with  the  leukemic  cells.  There  was  a  decrease  in  transplantability 
in  the  F2,  and  still  more  so  in  the  F3  generation.  In  backcrosses  from  hybrids 
F1  to  the  susceptible  parents  leukemia  developed  in  100%,  while  in  the  back- 
crosses  from  Fx  hybrids  to  the  non-susceptible  parents  it  took  in  50%. 
Leukemia  arising  in  a  hybrid  F1  could  be  transferred  to  all  mice  belonging 
to  the  susceptible  parent  strain ;  this  is  contrary  to  what  should  be  expected 
according  to  the  theory  of  the  organismal  differentials  and  to  what  is  actually 
found  in  normal  tissues  and  in  mouse  carcinoma.  On  the  other  hand,  leu- 


382  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

kemia  could  not  be  transferred  to  any  individuals  belonging  to  the  non- 
susceptible  parent  strain.  The  results  were  variable  in  F2  hybrids ;  leukemia 
could  be  transferred  in  50%  of  F3  hybrids. 

These  results  could  perhaps  be  explained  if  we  assume  that  in  addition 
to  the  gene  sets  derived  from  both  parents,  which  determine  the  organismal 
differentials  of  these  leukemic  cells,  there  is  present  in  the  Fx  cells  an  intrinsic 
stimulus  (Gi),  derived  from  the  parent  which  is  susceptible  to  the  develop- 
ment of  spontaneous  leukemia.  The  possession  of  this  intrinsic  stimulus 
converts  the  lymphoid  cell  into  a  leukemic  cell  and  makes  it  possible  for  this 
cell  to  proliferate  in  an  abnormal  manner. 

In  the  inbred  strain  of  mice  in  which  leukemia  occurs  spontaneously  in  a 
high  percentage  of  cases,  a  factor  (Ge)  is  present  which  stimulates  or 
otherwise  makes  it  possible  for  the  leukemic  cells  to  multiply  and  thus  to 
transfer  the  disease,  while  in  other  strains  this  auxiliary  factor  is  lacking. 
The  activity  of  both  the  intrinsic  factor  within  the  leukemic  cells  and  the 
auxiliary  factor  would  enable  the  cells  to  overcome  the  resistance  to  the 
growth  which  is  due  to  the  presence  of  a  combination  of  a  set  of  strange 
genes  and  a  set  of  genes  identical  with  those  of  the  host.  We  have  referred 
to  a  similar  condition  already  in  the  preceding  chapter,  when  we  discussed 
the  effect  of  the  continued  action  of  Ge  (hormones)  on  transplantation  of 
not  yet  full  cancerous  tumors. 

Further  complications  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that  long-continued  trans- 
plantations may  modify  the  immunological  characteristics  of  tumor  cells  and, 
according  to  MacDowell,  also  of  leukemic  cells.  However,  not  all  leukemic 
cells  arising  in  F1  hybrids  of  two  strains,  one  of  which  has  a  high  and  the 
other  a  low  incidence  of  spontaneous  leukemia,  behave  in  the  manner  ob- 
served by  Furth  and  Barnes.  Kirschbaum  and  L.  C.  Strong  found  that  the 
leukemic  cells  from  F1  hybrids  between  the  CBA  and  F  strains  behaved  in 
the  same  way  as  typical  carcinoma  cells  originating  in  such  hybrids,  while 
the  leukemic  cells  from  other  kinds  of  Fx  hybrids  in  which  leukemia  had 
been  produced  experimentally  could  behave  in  an  entirely  different  manner. 
But  notwithstanding  the  existence  of  such  complications  which  may  arise,  in 
general,  it  may  be  concluded  that  it  is  the  organismal  differentials  in  host 
and  transplanted  tumor  and  the  genetic  factors  of  which  these  differentials 
are  the  expression  which  primarily  determine  the  fate  of  the  transplant  in  a 
given  host. 

The  genetic  constitution  of  an  individual  influences  the  receptivity  or 
resistance  to  the  inoculation  of  a  tumor  by  way  of  the  individuality  and 
species  differentials  of  which  the  genes  are  the  precursor  elements.  Further- 
more, there  are  indications  that  special  growth  promoting  substances  may 
aid  in  the  growth  of  transplanted  cancer  cells  in  certain  cases,  and  it  is 
probable  that  these  growth  promoting  substances  (Ge)  which  may  be  either 
hormone-like  or  virus-like,  are  also  ultimately  determined  genetically. 
Organismal  or  individuality  differential  substances  may  be  fixed  in  tissues  as 
well  as  be  present  in  the  circulating  bodyfluids.   In  certain  respects  they 


HEREDITY  AND  TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS      383 

represent  gene  hormones  through  which  in  the  course  of  embryonal  develop- 
ment gene  effects  may  be  transmitted  to  the  recipient  tissues  and  organs. 

There  are  two  experiments  which  indicate  that  substances  of  this  kind 
may  be  transmitted  by  means  of  parabiosis  from  one  animal  which  is 
genetically  receptive  to  the  growth  of  a  transplanted  tumor  to  the  partner 
which  is  genetically  resistant  to  such  a  tumor.  Thus  Zakrzewski  observed  that 
a  Wistar  rat,  a  strain  not  susceptible  to  the  growth  of  the  Jensen  sarcoma, 
could  be  made  susceptible  by  the  parabiotic  union  with  a  susceptible  Warsaw 
rat.  Similarly  Cloudman  found  that  a  hepatoma  which  originated  in  the  C57 
leaden  strain,  and  which  could  readly  be  transplanted  into  mice  belonging  to 
this  strain,  but  which  could  not  be  transplanted  as  a  rule  into  black  C57 
strain  mice  could  be  made  to  grow  in  the  C57  black  if  the  latter  was  united 
by  parabiosis  with  a  C57  leaden  strain  mouse. 

However,  as  a  rule  it  does  not  seem  to  be  possible  to  change  the  inherited 
strain  receptivity  or  resistance  of  an  animal  by  parabiotic  union  with  an 
individual  belonging  to  a  strain  differing  in  these  respects  from  the  first 
strain.  Each  of  the  two  partners  retains  its  own  specific  mode  of  reaction 
against  the  transplant.  It  is  perhaps  necessary  that  the  differences  in  the 
constitution  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  two  parabiotic  partners 
do  not  exceed  a  certain  limit  if  a  differential  favorable  to  tumor  growth 
shall  exert  its  characteristic  effects  in  the  second  partner.  But  as  stated  it  is 
possible  that  in  addition  special  substances  favoring  the  growth  of  certain 
cancer  cells  may  be  involved  in  this  effect. 


Chapter  J 

The  Relation  Between  Growth  Energy,  Adaptive 

Processes  and  Organismal  Differentials  in 

the  Transplantation  of  Tumors 

In  order  to  evaluate  the  role  which  organismal  differentials  play  in  the 
growth  and  transplantability  of  tumors,  it  will  be  necessary  to  consider 
separately  certain  variable  factors  which,  in  their  interaction  with 
organismal  differentials,  may  influence  the  results  of  transplantation.  Among 
these  the  most  important  ones  are  changes  in  growth  energy  and  adaptive 
processes  which  may  take  place  in  the  tumor  in  the  course  of  serial  trans- 
plantation in  response  to  conditions  present  in  the  host;  processes  of  im- 
munity may  also  be  considered  as  adaptive  changes,  but  they  occur  in  the 
host  as  a  reaction  to  the  growth  of  the  tumor.  Adaptive  processes  in  the 
tumor  may  consist  in  changes  in  the  readiness  with  which  organismal  (indi- 
viduality) differential  substances  are  produced  and  given  off  into  the  circu- 
lation of  the  host;  likewise,  the  sensitiveness  of  the  tumor  and  its  power  of 
resistance  to  injurious  substances  of  the  host  may  be  modified;  this  would  be 
added  to  primary  differences  in  the  sensitiveness  which  distinguish  different 
types  of  tumors. 

However,  the  degree  of  adaptability  of  a  tumor  to  a  new  environment 
may  be  determined,  in  addition,  by  variations  in  growth  energy  which  may 
take  place  in  the  course  of  serial  transplantation.  The  growth  energy  of 
tumors  was  considered  by  us  (1905)  as  one  of  the  factors  on  which  depends 
their  transplantability,  a  low  degree  of  growth  energy  rendering  transplanta- 
tion more  difficult.  In  addition,  we  recognized  in  the  host,  as  significant  for 
the  fate  of  the  graft,  a  factor  corresponding  to  what  we  later  defined  as 
individuality  and  species  differentials.  Among  the  growth  factors  we  dif- 
ferentiated those  inherent  in  the  tumor  cells  (Gi)  from  others  circulating 
in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  (Ge),  and  furthermore,  we  differentiated  factors 
which  permit  a  tumor  to  live,  without  necessarily  enabling  it  to  grow,  from 
other  conditions  which  enable  it  to  grow.  The  growth  energy  was  measured 
by  the  duration  of  the  period  of  latency  as  well  as  by  the  rapidity  of  growth 
of  the  visible  tumor.  Different  tumors  were  seen  to  differ  very  much  in  their 
growth  energy  and  in  their  ability  to  withstand  the  injurious  conditions 
associated  with  the  process  of  transplantation,  and  among  the  latter  there 
were  some  tumors  which  did  not  grow  even  after  autotransplantation.  We 
distinguished,  therefore,  between  weakly  and  rapidly  growing  tumors,  be- 
tween temporarily  and  permanently  growing  tumors,  and  between  transplant- 
able and  non-transplantable  tumors;  also  between  stable  and  labile  tumors, 
the  former  retaining  their  growth  energy  unaltered,  the  latter,  as  a  result  of 

384 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  385 

various  stimuli,  showing  an  increase  in  growth  energy,  especially  in  the 
course  of  the  first  transplantations.  If  the  constitutional  factors  in  host  or 
transplant,  in  particular  the  relations  between  organismal  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant,  are  unfavorable,  the  various  kinds  of  growth  stimuli 
may  not  be  able  to  overcome  the  obstacles  to  transplantation,  but  on  the 
other  hand,  if  the  inherent  specific  tumor  stimulus  (Gi)  is  very  strong,  the 
tumor  may  be  able  to  overcome  a  not  quite  adequate  constitutional  condition 
and  may  dispense  with  growth  hormones  or  other  growth  promoting  sub- 
stances (Ge)  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids.  The  less  favorable  the  constitu- 
tional condition  of  the  organismal  differentials,  the  stronger  must  be  the 
growth  factors,  those  present  in  the  host  as  well  as  those  residing  in  the 
transplanted  tumor  cells,  if  a  continuous  growth  of  the  tumor  shall  be 
accomplished. 

Because  of  the  action  of  these  variables,  including  the  relationship  be- 
tween the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  growth  energy 
and  transplantability  of  a  tumor  do  not  need  to  follow  a  parallel  course.  The 
difference  between  these  two  sets  of  conditions  was  especially  marked  in  the 
case  of  a  carcinoma  originating  in  a  Japanese  waltzing  mouse  studied  by  us; 
all  the  transplants  grew,  but  the  growth  energy  of  the  developing  tumors 
was,  at  least  in  the  first  generation,  not  great.  Here  the  constitutional  factors, 
the  individuality  differentials,  in  the  host  and  graft  were  well  adapted  to 
each  other.  The  distinction  between  growth  energy  and  transplantability  was 
subsequently  emphasized  also  by  Apolant,  and  it  still  is  useful  at  the  present 
time. 

I.  Changes  in  Growth  Energy 

Of  the  two  sets  of  factors,  the  constitutional  factors  residing  in  the  host 
and  those  determining  the  growth  energy  of  the  tumor  cells,  the  latter  were 
more  readily  accessible  to  experimental  analysis  and  the  first  attempts  we're 
therefore  directed  towards  their  modification  by  exposing  the  tumor  cells 
to  certain  physical  and  chemical  conditions.  These  experiments  revealed  the 
degree  of  what  may  be  termed  the  elasticity  of  the  tumor  cells,  their  ability 
to  recover  from  injury  and  to  regain  the  growth  energy  which  had  been 
diminished  by  their  exposure  to  injurious  factors.  Such  reactions  on  the 
part  of  the  tumor  cells  also  represent  adaptive  processes ;  but  they  are 
temporary,  not  permanent  adaptations.  In  the  early  period  of  experimental 
cancer  investigations,  the  writer  determined  the  intensity  of  heat  required  to 
cause  the  death  of  the  rat  sarcoma  cells,  and  Jensen,  independently,  made 
similar  determinations  in  mouse  carcinoma.  While  the  methods  used  in  these 
two  cases  were  different,  the  results  were  of  the  same  kind.  We  found,  also, 
the  conditions  under  which  certain  chemical  substances,  such  as  glycerin 
and  KCN,  kill  the  tumor  cells.  It  could  be  shown  (1903)  by  the  use  of  inter- 
mediate intensities  in  physical  and  chemical  actions  that  between  the  full 
virulence  and  the  death  point  of  the  tumor  cells  there  exists  an  intermediate 
stage,  in  which  the  latter  are  still  alive  though  growing  with  a  much 
diminished  energy.   In  certain  cases,   tumors  grew   temporarily;   then   the 


386  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

growth  ceased  and  a  retrogression  took  place.  It  is  therefore  possible  to 
diminish  experimentally  the  growth  energy  of  cancers.  These  results  applied 
equally  to  sarcoma  of  the  rat  and  to  adenocarcinoma  of  the  mouse.  In  some 
instances  a  very  interesting  phenomenon  was  observed;  after  heating  the 
tumor  in  vitro  for  twenty  to  twenty-six  minutes  at  44°C,  the  growth  energy 
of  pieces,  after  transplantation  into  a  living  animal,  decreased,  but  following 
this  early  period  of  slowed  growth  a  certain  degree  of  recovery  set  in.  While 
usually  this  recovery  was  incomplete  and  the  tumors  which  developed  re- 
mained smaller  than  is  normal  for  unheated  tumors,  in  some  instances  the 
recovery  was  complete.  However,  in  other  cases  the  growth  energy  remained 
weak  and  at  last  the  resulting  tumors  became  stationary  or  retrogressed.  This 
was  especially  noticeable  after  heating  pieces  for  fifty-five  to  sixty  minutes, 
when  there  was  a  great  decrease  in  growth  and  recovery  was  rare.  But  even 
under  these  conditions  recovery  sometimes  occurred  and  a  period  of  more 
rapid  growth  followed.  Some  tumors  showed  what  we  called  an  oscillating 
growth,  in  which  a  weak  growth  or  a  stationary  condition,  or  even  an 
incomplete  retrogression,  was  followed  by  a  definite  but  slow  growth,  and 
this  again  by  a  cessation  of  growth  and  retrogression.  On  the  whole,  the 
effects  of  the  intensity  of  heat  on  the  latency  period,  the  growth  energy 
of  the  tumors,  and  the  number  of  retrogressions  took  a  parallel  course. 

Inasmuch  as  the  change  in  growth  energy  of  tumors  produced  by  an 
injurious  external  agent  could  persist  for  a  number  of  cell  generations,  it 
became  of  interest  to  determine  whether  repeated  applications  of  heat,  in 
successive  transplantations,  would  lead  to  a  summation  of  the  injurious 
effects,  or  whether  in  the  course  of  subsequent  transplantations  a  recovery 
might  still  take  place.  There  was  noted  such  tendency  of  the  tumor  cells  to 
recover  from  these  injurious  effects  and  this  process  seemed  to  be  aided 
by  an  intervening  transplantation  into  a  new  host.  However,  the  restitution 
of  the  full  growth  energy  in  previously  heated  tumors  was  delayed  after 
transplantation  under  these  conditions.  There  occurs  then,  after  all,  in  these 
cases,  a  summation  of  injuries  caused  by  the  heating  and  the  process  of 
transplantation,  but  this  condition  may  be  followed  after  some  time  by 
recovery.  Such  a  recovery  may  also  take  place  in  tumors  which  have  been 
injured  by  other  means  than  heat;  a  heterotoxin  injures  the  tumor  trans- 
planted into  a  strange  species,  but  recovery  may  occur  after  return  into 
the  same  species,  as  Ehrlich  has  shown.  Chambers,  Scott  and  Russ  noted  the 
injurious  effect  of  the  action  of  X-rays  on  rat  sarcoma.  In  this  case,  also,  a 
gradual  recovery  was  seen  after  successive  transplantations.  And  inasmuch 
as  the  process  of  transplantation  as  such  is  an  injurious  one,  we  may  con- 
clude that  this  faculty  to  recover  from  injurious  effects  is  one  of  the  condi- 
tions that  makes  possible  the  continued  transplantation  into  successive  gen- 
erations of  strange  individuals  of  the  same  species.  While  thus  in  most 
instances  a  summation  of  the  injuries  caused  by  heat,  leading  to  irreversible 
changes,  does  not  take  place  in  successive  generations,  but  instead  recovery 
follows,  the  opposite  effect,  a  state  of  increased  resistance  to  heating  as  a 
result  of  repeated  exposures  to  higher  temperatures,  is  likewise  lacking. 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  387 

If,  following  exposure  to  a  sufficiently  intense  heat  the  tumor  cells  are 
injured,  they  may  no  longer  be  able  to  resist  to  the  same  degree  as  normal 
cancer,  the  activity  of  the  connective  tissue  of  the  host,  which  thus  begins 
to  envelope  the  tumor  with  a  fibrous  capsule  and  to  restrict  its  expansive 
growth.  But  following  transplantation  into  a  new  host,  a  recovery  of  the 
tumor  again  may  be  accomplished  and  the  tumor  cells  may  now  predominate 
over  the  stroma  cells  of  the  host.  Furthermore,  in  accordance  with  the 
diminution  in  growth  energy  following  the  heating,  we  found  that  the 
number  of  cells  undergoing  mitotic  division  is  distinctly  diminished,  although 
mitoses  are  not  quite  suspended ;  however,  mitotic  proliferation  may  occur, 
as  we  have  shown  formerly,  even  in  retrogressing  tumors.  Lastly,  we  noted 
that  as  the  result  of  the  depression  in  growth  energy  following  heating,  cer- 
tain reparative  processes,  which  otherwise  could  take  place  in  the  tumor,  are 
inhibited ;  thus  the  growth  of  active  tumor  cells  into  the  central  necrotic  areas 
and  the  replacement  of  the  latter  by  these  cells  are  retarded.  As  these  experi- 
ments show,  we  are  able  to  produce  through  experimental  interference, 
depressions  in  the  growth  energy  of  tumors,  with  or  without  subsequent 
complete  recovery,  or  with  only  a  temporary  recovery.  A  similar  diminution 
in  growth  energy,  number  of  mitoses  and, oxygen  intake,  has  been  observed 
by  Maus,  Craig  and  Salter  after  transplantation  of  mouse  sarcoma  180  into 
immunized  mice;  as  a  result  of  the  immune  processes,  conditions  injurious 
for  the  tumor  cells  had  been  created. 

The  experiments  to  which  we  have  referred  so  far,  concern  sarcoma,  but 
similar  results  can  be  obtained  also  in  experiments  with  carcinoma.  Thus, 
the  writer  and  E.  P.  Corson-White  observed  that  if  the  growth  energy  has 
been  depressed,  either  through  graded  heating  of  the  pieces  of  carcinoma 
preceding  transplantation  or  through  transplantation  of  the  tumor  into 
unfavorable  strains  of  mice  bearing  a  different  strain  differential,  transplanta- 
tion of  the  injured  tumor  cells  into  other  more  favorable  mice  might  lead 
to  the  development  of  tumors  which  grew  much  more  actively  than  the 
injured  tumor  which  had  been  used  for  transplantation,  although  as  a 
general  rule  the  tumors  developing  under  these  conditions  showed  less 
growth  energy  than  the  average  normal  carcinoma  No.  IX.  It  was  possible 
through  continued  serial  transplantation  of  depressed  tumors  to  raise  still 
further  their  growth  energy.  In  this  manner,  tumor  tissue  which  otherwise 
would  have  perished,  could  be  saved.  But  also  in  this  series,  as  in  the 
preceding  one,  grafted  pieces  of  tumor  failed  to  develop  when  once  a  certain 
stage  of  retrogression  had  been  reached.  Certain  types  of  tumors  which  are 
presumably  very  sensitive  to  injury  may  therefore  not  respond  to  these 
procedures  with  a  resumption  of  their  growth  energy.  It  seems,  moreover, 
that  in  different  types  of  tumors  the  inherent  potential  growth  energy  differs 
and  the  behavior  of  retrogressing  or  stationary  tumors  may  depend  also 
upon  this  factor.  There  is  a  constant  balancing  between  the  inherent  growth 
energy  and  antagonistic  factors,  such  as  marked  differences  between  the 
organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  or  direct  injury  of  the  tumor 
caused  by  the  graded  application  of  heat  or  of  certain  chemicals,  or,  in  some 


388  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

cases,  also  by  microorganisms.  In  principle,  all  these  and  still  other  more  or 
less  accidental  factors  act  in  a  similar  way.  Thus  we  can  understand  that 
under  certain  circumstances  these  two  sets  of  factors  may  approximately 
balance  each  other  and  thus  the  oscillating  growth  which  we  have  described 
may  be  brought  about. 

However,  not  only  a  depression  in  growth  energy  of  tumor  cells,  but  also 
the  opposite  effect,  can  be  obtained  experimentally,  namely,  an  increase  in 
growth  energy  in  cells  which  possess  either  a  normal  or  a  very  low  level  of 
growth  energy,  or  which  may  be  retrogressing.  Clowes  and  Baeslack  observed 
that  in  not  very  virulent  tumors  the  growth  energy  may  be  stimulated  through 
a  very  mild  exposure  to  heat;  after  subjecting  tumor  material  for  one  hour 
to  a  temperature  of  40°-41°C,  they  noted  a  certain  stimulation.  Michaelis 
also  found  such  a  stimulation  under  similar  conditions,  as  well  as  after  the 
use  of  very  low  concentrations  of  otherwise  poisonous  substances.  But,  pre- 
vious to  these  experiments,  in  our  early  serial  transplantations  of  rat  sarcoma, 
we  had  produced  stimulation  in  tumors  in  which,  as  a  result  of  injurious 
factors,  the  growth  energy  had  been  lowered,  leading  to  a  stationary  state 
or  to  retrogression.  In  a  number  of  such  tumors  it  was  possible,  by  mechanical 
means,  such  as  pulling  a  thread  through  the  cancer,  making  an  incision  into  it, 
or  excising  a  piece  of  the  tumor,  to  bring  about  a  resumption  of  growth, 
which  occurred  in  certain  cases  even  when  transplantation  of  a  tumor  nodule 
to  a  different  place  in  the  same  animal  had  no  or  only  a  slight  effect.  But  in 
another  experiment,  transplantation  of  a  stationary  tumor  into  a  second 
animal  led  to  a  complete  restoration  of  the  growth  energy  of  the  tumor,  which 
subsequently  could  be  further  transplanted  into  other  animals.  Such  a  stimu- 
lation was  accomplished  in  stationary  and  retrogressing  tumors  only  if 
mitotic  activity  was  still  present  in  the  tumor  cells;  if  this  had  ceased,  the 
results  were  unsatisfactory.  Thus  it  is  seen  that  certain  mechanical  factors, 
such  as  incisions,  extirpation  of  pieces  of  tumor,  removal  of  pressure  exerted 
by  a  fibrous  capsule,  or  the  process  of  transplantation,  may  stimulate  growth 
energy;  but  it  may  also  be  that,  in  some  transplantations,  the  transfer  to 
hosts  with  strange  individuality  differentials  may  have  had  an  additional 
growth-stimulating  effect. 

We  have  referred  already  to  the  increase  in  growth  energy  which  occurs 
quite  commonly  after  transplantation  of  spontaneous  tumors  into  other  indi- 
viduals of  the  same  species  and  strains ;  this  was  noticeable  in  our  first  trans- 
plantations of  rat  sarcoma;  it  was  very  definite  also  in  our  transplantations 
of  a  tumor  which  had  developed  spontaneously  in  a  Japanese  waltzing  mouse, 
and  which  could  be  successfully  transplanted  into  all  other  Japanese  mice. 
Although  in  this  instance  the  individuality  differentials  in  tumor  and  waltzing 
mice  serving  as  hosts  were  sufficiently  similar  to  allow  takes  in  100%  of  the 
transplantations,  still  there  was  a  marked  increase  in  the  growth  energy  of 
the  grafts  in  the  early  generations.  This  may  therefore  be  attributed  to  a 
stimulation  of  the  tumor  cells  resulting  from  the  process  of  transplantation, 
as  such.  Similar  effects  of  transplantation  were  observable  also  in  the  sub- 
sequent transplantations  of  chicken  sarcoma  by  Rous  and  Murphy.  Here  it 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  389 

was  apparent,  furthermore,  that  the  more  actively  the  tumor  grew,  the  greater 
was  the  number  of  individuals  in  which  it  took.  Likewise,  in  the  experiments 
of  Chambers,  Scott  and  Russ  with  a  rat  carcinoma  which  had  been  injured 
through  radiation,  there  was  a  parallelism  noticeable  between  the  change  in 
growth  energy  and  number  of  takes.  It  was  also  found  in  the  transplantation 
of  leukemic  cells  into  individuals  of  the  strain  in  which  the  leukemia  had 
originated. 

There  was,  moreover,  in  our  experiments  a  correlation  between  the 
growth  energy  of  spontaneous  tumors  and  their  transplantability  into  other 
individuals,  and  Woglom,  too,  noted  a  parallelism  between  the  number  of 
successful  transplantations  of  spontaneous  tumors  into  other  mice  and  the 
growth  energy  of  these  tumors.  However,  Woglom  also  observed  that  even 
very  slow-growing  tumors  may  yield  a  high  percentage  of  takes,  an  observa- 
tion which  corresponds  with  our  above  mentioned  experiments  with  the 
Japanese  mouse,  and  which  may  be  explained  essentially  by  the  great  simi- 
larity of  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  graft.  But,  in  general,  a 
tumor  with  greater  growth  energy  will  be  better  able  to  overcome  the  re- 
sistance which  relatively  unfavorable  constellations  of  the  individuality 
differentials  present,  than  a  tumor  with  a  lesser  growth  energy.  In  addition 
to  this  factor,  also  variations  in  the  resistance  of  various  tumors  to  injurious 
conditions  and  in  the  rapidity  with  which  organismal  differential  substances 
are  produced  by  tumor  and  host  may  interfere  with  the  proportionality  be- 
tween growth  energy  and  transplantability. 

The  increase  in  growth  energy  which  so  often  follows  the  first  trans- 
plantation of  a  tumor  is  limited ;  it  usually  reaches  a  maximum  in  the  first  or 
in  one  of  the  following  generations  of  tumors  and  from  then  on  remains 
approximately  constant.  But,  on  the  other  hand,  there  can  be  no  doubt  as  to 
the  reality  of  this  change  and  the  great  frequency  of  its  occurrence.  On  the 
contrary,  the  rhythmic  variations  in  growth  and  transplantability  of  tumors, 
which,  as  Bashford,  Murray  and  Cramer  assumed,  take^f  place  in  successive 
generations  of  a  transplanted  tumor  and  which  they  attributed  to  conditions 
inherent  in  the  tumor,  were  probably  caused  by  changes  in  environmental 
factors  affecting  the  growth  energy  of  the  tumor  cells.  Bashford  believed, 
furthermore,  that  through  selective  transplantation,  a  tumor  may  be  divided 
into  substrains,  which  differ  in  certain  characteristics  and  vary  independently 
of  each  other  in  regard  to  growth  rhythms.  He  held  that  a  tumor  represents 
a  conglomeration  of  cells  endowed  with  different  characteristics.  These 
rhythmic  changes  were  not  found  by  Fleisher  in  the  case  of  carcinoma  No. 
IX,  nor  by  Bittner  in  his  series  of  transplantations.  Bittner  holds  that  varia- 
tions in  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  hosts,  due  to  the  use  of  mixed 
strains  of  animals,  are  responsible  for  these  apparent  rhythms. 

II.  Adaptation  of  Tumor  Cells  to  Environmental  Conditions 

In  addition  to  the  factors  mentioned,  we  have  to  consider  some  special 
adaptive  changes  which  take  place  between  transplant  and  host  in  the  course 
of  transplantations,  as  an  occurrence  which  may  influence  the  transplanta- 


390  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

bility  of  tumors  and  complicate  the  analysis  of  the  organismal  differentials. 
However,  it  is  necessary  to  distinguish  from  real  adaptive  processes  a  condi- 
tion which  may  lead  perhaps  to  similar  changes,  but  is  different.  As  a  result 
of  selective  transplantation,  lines  of  tumors,  differing  in  certain  character- 
istics, may  be  separated  from  the  original  tumor.  By  always  selecting  the 
most  actively  growing  tumors  for  transplantation  it  was  thought  possible 
to  separate  from  the  tumors  with  ordinary  growth  energy  and  transplanta- 
bility,  a  line  which  exceeded  this  average  tendency.  In  these  instances  we 
would  have  to  deal  not  with  adaptive  changes  in  the  tumor — the  character- 
istics of  the  tumor  cells  remaining  the  same  throughout — but  with  a  selection 
of  certain  types  among  several  already  in  existence.  In  the  case  of  true 
adaptation,  on  the  other  hand,  actual  changes  in  the  characteristics  of  tumor 
cells  would  occur.  Ehrlich  used  such  a  method  of  selection  in  order  to  obtain 
readily  transplantable  tumors.  He  compared  this  procedure  with  that  em- 
ployed in  order  to  increase  the  virulence  of  bacteria,  where,  in  serial  inocu- 
lations of  certain  microorganisms  into  susceptible  animals,  the  most  virulent 
strain  of  bacteria  was  selected  for  each  inoculation.  However,  Ehrlich 
believes  that  at  the  same  time  changes  take  place  in  the  tumor  cells  in  the 
course  of  transplantation. 

In  contradistinction  to  the  increase  in  growth  energy  in  successive  genera- 
tions of  transplantations  which  we  had  observed,  Ehrlich  stressed  the  increase 
in  percentage  of  takes  in  successive  generations  of  transplanted  tumors,  and 
in  accordance  with  his  conception  of  athrepsia,  as  the  main  factor  which 
determines  the  life  and  growth  of  cells,  he  explained  the  increase  in  trans- 
plantability  in  the  course  of  serial  transplantations  as  due  to  a  new  produc- 
tion of  "nutriceptors"  in  tumor  cells,  which,  according  to  his  views,  took 
place  under  the  unfavorable  conditions  following  transplantations  into  new 
hosts.  Thus,  the  behavior  of  tumor  cells  was  explained  in  the  same  way  as 
the  origin  of  strains  of  trypanosomes  resistant  to  trypanicidal  substances. 
Ehrlich  operated  therefore,  essentially  with  one  variable  factor,  namely,  the 
difference  in  the  ability  of  different  cells  to  attract  foodstuffs  to  themselves, 
and  he  assumed  that  a  selection  takes  place  in  cells  which  differ  in  their 
power  to  respond  to  unfavorable  conditions  with  changes  in  their  nutriceptor 
apparatus.  However,  it  would  be  difficult  to  explain  on  this  basis  the  fact 
that  the  variations  in  growth  energy  and  transplantability  which  do  occur 
do  not  always  take  a  parallel  course ;  Ehrlich  did  not  take  into  account  the 
differences  which  exist  in  the  individuality  differentials  of  different  hosts,  and 
he  also  failed  to  consider  the  effects  of  separating  strains  of  hosts.  Further- 
more, he  did  not  consider  the  relations  which  exist  between  growth  energy 
and  transplantability. 

Various  observations  make  it  very  probable  that  adaptive  changes  in  the 
constitution  of  tumors  can  actually  take  place.  The  considerable  increase  in 
the  number  of  takes,  which  has  been  noted  by  different  investigators  in  the 
course  of  serial  transplantation  of  spontaneous  tumors  into  strains  of  animals 
in  which  they  at  first  grew  only  with  difficulty,  is  probably  at  least  partly  due 
to  certain  adaptive  changes  which  have  arisen  in  the  tumors  in  the  new  host. 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  391 

Thus  Bashford  and  Murray  found  that  the  Jensen  mouse  carcinoma,  which 
grew  readily  in  Danish  mice,  but  only  with  difficulty  in  English  mice,  began 
to  grow  at  last  also  in  the  latter  in  the  course  of  continued  transplantations. 
Similarly,  the  first  Rous  chicken  sarcoma  which,  according  to  Rous  and 
Murphy,  at  first  took  only  in  blood  relatives  of  the  animal  in  which  it  had 
originated,  after  further  transplantation  grew  well  also  in  non-related 
chickens  of  the  same  variety,  and  after  still  further  propagation  it  became 
adapted  even  to  growth  in  different  varieties  of  fowl.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
second  Rous  sarcoma,  an  osteochondroma,  grew  from  the  start  in  all  varieties 
of  fowl,  in  conformity  perhaps  with  the  relatively  low  degree  of  sensitiveness 
of  cartilage  to  differences  in  individuality  differentials.  Rous  and  Murphy 
observed  also  a  selective  process,  which  led  to  the  opposite  effect ;  by 
selecting  weakly  growing  tumors  for  further  transplantation,  a  line  of 
tumors  was  propagated  which  tended  to  undergo  retrogression.  In  this  case 
evidently  the  tumor  cells  had  been  injured  through  unfavorable  organismal 
differentials  of  the  host,  or  through  certain  secondary  factors — an  injury 
similar  to  that  obtained  by  heating — and  after  successive  transplantations 
these  injuries  accumulated.  We  have  already  referred  to  the  experiments  of 
Duran-Reynals,  in  which  marked  adaptive  changes  were  observed  in  Rous 
chicken  sarcoma  cells  after  transplantation  into  ducks ;  these  changes  affected 
primarily  the  agent  situated  in  the  cells,  but  secondarily,  the  cells  themselves 
seemed  to  undergo  corresponding  adaptive  changes,  presumably  under  the 
influence  of  the  agent  they  contained. 

Similar  in  certain  respects  were  the  adaptations  which  Roffo  noted  in  a 
transplantable  rat  tumor.  Through  continuous  selective  tranplantation  he 
succeeded  in  adapting  this  tumor  to  growth  in  different  varieties  of  rats.  At 
last  it  could  be  successfully  transplanted  in  70  per  cent  of  wild  rats,  in  which 
it  had  not  been  able  to  grow  at  all  in  the  beginning.  It  was  of  interest  that 
also  in  these  experiments  there  was  a  parallelism  between  the  increase  in 
transplantability  and  growth  energy  of  the  tumors,  indicating  that  we  may 
not  have  had  to  deal  solely  with  an  increase  in  transplantability  due  to  special 
adaptive  processes,  but  also  to  an  increase  in  growth  energy.  Similar  adaptive 
changes  were  apparently  observed  by  Gheorgiu  when  he  transplanted  mouse 
tumors  into  very  young  rats.  With  successive  passages  the  process  of  complete 
retrogression  in  the  heterogenous  animals  became  more  and  more  delayed, 
until  at  last  growth  extended  as  long  as  to  the  twenty-seventh  day  following 
transplantation.  After  several  passages  in  newly-born  rats,  in  which  presum- 
ably the  mechanisms  of  reaction  against  strange  organismal  differentials  are 
not  yet  fully  developed,  the  tumors  could  be  transplanted  also  into  older  suck- 
lings, but  here  the  tumor  did  not  live  as  long  as  in  the  very  young  animals.  The 
retrogression  and  absorption  in  these  young  animals  seemed  to  follow  without 
the  aid  of  leucocytes  (lymphocytes).  After  reinoculation  into  mice  the  tumors 
grew  with  increased  intensity.  There  are  still  additional  experiences  which 
point  to  adaptations  taking  place  in  tumors  in  the  course  of  serial  trans- 
plantations and  causing  an  increase  in  their  transplantability.  Furth  and  others 
observed  that  also  leukemic  cells  after  continued  serial  transplantations  be- 


392  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

came  more  virulent,  which  means  that  they  multiplied  more  rapidly  in  the  host ; 
at  the  same  time,  certain  structural  and  other  changes  occured  and  these  cells 
acquired  the  ability  to  propagate  in  alien  strains  into  which  they  could  not  be 
transplanted  in  the  beginning.  However,  in  such  experiments  it  is  difficult  to 
determine  how  far  the  increase  in  transplantability  of  the  leukemic  cells  is  due 
to  the  increase  in  growth  momentum  and  how  far  it  is  due  to  actual  adaptive 
processes  to  strange  individuality  differentials.  In  some  cases,  on  the  other 
hand,  the  contrary  effect,  namely,  a  greater  sensitiveness  to  strange  individu- 
ality differentials,  has  been  observed  in  the  course  of  continued  transfers. 

We  have  referred  above  to  the  experiments  of  Gheorgiu,  in  which  adaptive 
processes,  arising  in  mouse  tumors,  gradually  increased  the  ability  of  these 
tumors  to  grow  also  in  heterogenous,  although  nearly  related  species.  Similar 
observations  have  been  made  in  the  Putnoky  experiments,  in  which  a  mouse 
carcinoma  could  be  serially  transplanted  into  rats ;  but  these  we  have  discussed 
in  an  earlier  chapter.  We  may,  however,  add  here  that  in  the  early  passages 
there  was  more  necrosis  than  in  later  ones,  in  which  the  tumors  were  able  to 
maintain  themselves  also  in  somewhat  older  rats.  There  was,  moreover,  a 
diminution  in  the  amount  of  stroma  in  the  rat-adapted  mouse  tumors.  In  these 
heterotransplantations,  as  well  as  in  the  transplantation  of  leukemic  cells  into 
different  strains,  certain  structural  changes  took  place  in  the  course  of  con- 
tinued transplantations;  furthermore,  rat-adapted  tumors,  when  transplanted 
back  to  mice,  showed  a  marked  growth  energy. 

In  a  considerable  number  of  experiments  it  was  possible  to  make  tumor  or 
leukemic  cells  grow  in  unfavorable  strains,  if  the  aggressive  power  of  the  hosts 
had  first  been  depressed  by  some  experimental  means.  Preliminary  treatment 
of  the  host  animals  with  X-ray  or  with  trypan  blue  had  this  effect.  Cancerous 
or  leukemic  cells,  which  had  been  propagated  for  some  time  in  such  specially 
prepared  hosts,  were  afterwards  able  to  propagate  in  otherwise  unsuitable 
strains,  even  without  a  preceding  experimental  depression  of  the  aggressive 
power  of  the  host  animals.  Another  method,  which  led  to  similar  results,  was 
used  by  Margaret  R.  Lewis,  who  inoculated  mouse  sarcoma  into  mice  belong- 
ing to  strains  which  were  genetically  unsuitable  for  the  growth  of  this  tumor. 
The  first  inoculations  of  this  kind  were  unsuccessful;  but  after  repeated 
inoculation  of  pieces  of  this  sarcoma  into  the  same  individual  mice,  the  sar- 
coma grew  in  the  end,  and  after  the  tumors  had  once  succeeded  in  growing  in 
alien  strains  they  could  be  further  propagated  in  these  strains  without  much 
difficulty.  Several  investigators  have  found  that  tumors  which  did  not  grow 
after  subcutaneous,  intramuscular  or  intraperitoneal  transplantations,  grew 
successfully  in  the  brain  or  in  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye.  Such  tumors 
could  subsequently  be  successfully  transplanted,  also,  by  subcutaneous  or 
intramuscular  inoculation  into  animals  in  which  originally  they  would  not  have 
grown  in  these  places.  But  such  an  increase  in  the  capacity  of  tumors  to  grow 
elsewhere  after  they  had  first  been  transplanted  into  the  anterior  chamber  of 
the  eye  was  not  noted  in  some  recent  experiments  which  Greene  carried  out 
with  rabbit  tumors. 

As  to  the  mechanism  underlying  these  adaptive  changes,  it  might  be  assumed 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  393 

that  these  are  due  to  somatic  mutations  in  the  tumor  cells,  rendering  the  organ- 
ismal  differentials  of  tumor  and  host  organisms  more  similar;  thus  the  differ- 
ential substances  in  the  tumor,  which  act  as  toxins  for  the  host,  would  be  di- 
minished, and  the  reaction  of  the  latter,  causing  an  injury  to  the  tumor,  would 
be  lessened  or  prevented.  According  to  this  interpretation,  mutations  would 
make  the  tumor  better  able  to  resist  injurious  conditions.  Thus  Warner  and 
Reinhard  interpreted  certain  changes  which  they  recently  observed  in  tumors 
following  treatment  with  X-rays  as  due  to  somatic  mutations.  They  exposed 
two  spontaneous  adenocarcinomas,  which  originated  in  the  dba  strain  and  in 
the  New  Buffalo  strain  of  mice-,  to  100  Roentgen  units  in  vivo,  or  to  50  Roent- 
gen units  in  vitro.  The  non-radiated  tumors  grew  in  100%  of  its  own  strains, 
but  not  in  strange  strains.  After  radiation  the  tumors  continued  to  grow 
in  100%  of  the  mice  belonging  to  the  strain  in  which  the  tumors  originated, 
but  they  now  grew,  also,  in  about  40%  of  mice  belonging  to  strange 
strains.  They  concluded  that  this  result  was  due  to  somatic  mutations  in  the 
tumor  cells.  This  is,  however,  improbable,  because  the  genetic  change,  which 
would  have  been  required  to  produce  the  adaptation  of  the  tumor  to  the  strange 
strain,  should  have  lowered  the  successful  transplantations  to  its  own  strain. 
Moreover,  it  does  not  appear  likely  that  a  random  somatic  mutation  which 
had  such  an  effect,  producing  the  same  percentage  of  takes  in  strange  strains, 
should  have  occurred  independently  in  two  different  tumors  belonging  to  two 
different  strains.  Lastly,  the  Roentgen  dose  necessary  for  inducing  mutations 
in  germ  cells  is  much  greater  than  the  one  used  in  these  experiments.  It  appears 
more  probable  that  the  X-rays  affected  a  cytoplasmic  mechanism,  which 
caused,  perhaps,  a  diminution  in  the  production  of  the  organismal  (individu- 
ality) differentials  in  the  tumor,  and  which  therefore  elicited  a  less  active 
reaction  of  the  strange  strain  against  the  transplant ;  this  cytoplasmic  change 
was  then  transmitted  to  successive  generations  of  tumor  cells.  In  general,  the 
same  objeections  which  can  be  raised  against  the  opinion  that  cancers  arise  as 
the  result  of  somatic  mutations  in  normal  cells,  or  that  variations  in  the  growth 
energy  and  in  the  number  of  takes,  which  occur  in  the  course  of  the  first 
transplantations,  have  such  an  origin,  apply  also  to  the  assumption  that  adap- 
tive changes  are  due  to  somatic  mutations.  The  adaptive  changes,  consisting  in 
an  increase  in  growth  momentum,  and  the  gradual  increase  in  takes  in  at  first 
unfavorable  hosts  are  again  due,  in  all  probability,  to  changes  in  cellular  metab- 
olism which  are  independent  of  somatic  mutations.  There  is  no  indication  that 
noticeable  changes  in  the  constitution  of  the  organismal  differentials  are  con- 
cerned in  these  adaptive  processes. 

This  applies  also  to  the  Ehrlich-Putnoky  carcinoma,  to  which  we  have  re- 
ferred previously.  The  behavior  of  this  tumor  suggests  that  no  definite  change 
in  the  species  differentials  of  the  tumor  has  taken  place  as  the  result  of  the 
serial  transplantation  of  tumor  cells  into  rats.  This  is  true  although  the  rat- 
adapted  strain  induces  in  the  rats,  in  which  it  has  grown  and  subsequently 
regressed,  immunity  against  Walker  rat  carcinoma  and  Jensen  rat  sarcoma; 
but  the  mouse-adapted  Putnoky  tumor  also  has  some  immunizing  effect, 
although  it  is  less  effective  in  this  respect.  However,  it  is  significant  that  this 


394  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

rat-adapted  mouse  carcinoma  could  not  be  transplanted  in  rats  previously 
treated  with  normal  or  cancerous  mouse  tissues,  while  a  previous  treatment 
of  rats  with  rat  tissue  did  not  prevent  transplantation.  We  may  therefore  as- 
sume that  the  rat-adapted  strain  of  the  Putnoky  mouse  tumor  bears  essentially 
the  species  differentials  of  the  mouse  and  it  is  possible  that  its  apparently  in- 
creased effectiveness  in  the  production  of  immunity  in  rats  may  be  due  to  its 
growth  momentum,  which  is  greater  in  the  rat-adapted  strain  than  in  the 
mouse-adapted  strain.  Yet,  even  if  the  increase  in  immunizing  power  which 
distinguishes  the  rat-adapted  strain  from  the  mouse-adapted  strain  should 
not  be  due  to  the  increased  growth  momentum,  it  still  would  not  be  necessary 
to  attribute  such  changes  to  somatic  gene  mutations ;  instead,  it  might  be  at- 
tributed with  greater  justification  to  metabolic  changes  taking  place  in  the 
tumor  cells,  independently  of  constitutional  modifications  of  the  organismal 
differentials.  The  same  considerations  apply  to  the  alterations  in  the  specific 
immunizing  action  which,  according  to  MacDowell  and  his  associates,  leukemic 
cells  undergo  in  the  course  of  serial  inoculation ;  properties  are  acquired 
which  make  these  propagated  lines  of  leukemic  cells  different  in  various  as- 
pects from  the  original  leukemic  cells  from  which  they  were  derived;  and 
similar  observations  have  been  made  by  Dmochowsky  in  the  case  of  ordinary 
cancerous  tissues. 

Somewhat  related  to  the  experiments  with  the  Putnoky  tumor  are  those  of 
Lumsden,  which  also  indicate  that  a  certain  adaptation  may  take  place  between 
a  tumor  and  a  heterogenous  host  of  a  nearly  related  species,  as  indicated  by  the 
reaction  of  the  tumor  cells  in  tissue  cultures.  Lumsden  finds  that  if  a  mouse 
carcinoma  has  been  developing  in  a  rat  for  a  week,  pieces  of  this  tumor  grow- 
ing in  vitro  are  not  injured  by  the  serum  of  the  rat  which  was  the  host  of  the 
tumor,  and  in  which,  therefore,  immune  bodies  have  developed  against  the 
mouse  carcinoma  cells ;  but  such  a  serum  rapidly  kills  mouse  carcinoma  cells 
which  have  previously  been  growing  in  a  mouse.  Likewise,  serum  of  a  rat  in 
which  a  rat  sarcoma  has  grown  is  not  injurious  to  mouse  tumor  cells  which 
have  been  growing  previously  in  a  rat,  but  it  is  injurious  to  mouse  carcinoma 
cells  which  have  been  growing  in  a  mouse.  Yet  such  tumor  cells,  which  have 
become  resistant  to  the  effects  of  heterogenous  immune  serum  acting  in  vitro, 
retain  their  specific  sensitiveness  to  transplantation  into  a  heterogenous  or- 
ganism. A  mouse  tumor  is  injured  after  transplantation  into  a  rat,  even  if  it 
has  been  growing  previously  in  a  rat.  Lumsden  assumes,  therefore,  that  the 
immunity  thus  acquired  by  the  tumor  cells  is  active  only  against  constituents  of 
the  blood  and,  moreover,  that  the  tumor  cells  growing  in  a  heterogenous  host 
acquire  the  ability  to  use  the  amino-acids  specific  for  the  latter  as  building 
stones  for  proteins,  which  are  no  longer  characteristic  of  their  own  but  of  the 
foreign  species ;  this  would  imply  that  the  species  differential  of  the  tumor 
cells  changes  into  that  of  the  foreign  species.  However,  all  the  data  known  so 
far  point  to  the  conclusion  that  the  animal  organism  transforms  amino-acids 
into  protein  of  its  own  kind.  The  adaptation  occurring  in  the  tumors  growing 
in  heterogenous  hosts  must  therefore  be  due  to  processes  of  a  different  nature. 

There  have  thus  been  established  certain  variable  factors  which  affect  the 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  395 

transplantability  of  tumors  into  different  kinds  of  hosts,  such  as  the  growth 
energy  of  tumors  and  their  power  to  adapt  themselves  to  conditions  present 
in  the  hosts.  These  characteristics,  or  the  potentiality  to  develop  them,  were 
acquired  during  the  process  of  the  transformation  of  normal  tissue  cells  into 
cancer  cells,  and  this  transformation  is  due  to  the  interaction  of  genetic  factors, 
transmitted  by  the  germ  cells,  with  variable  stimulating  factors ;  both  these  sets 
of  factors,  the  intrinsic  genetic  and  the  extrinsic  stimulating  ones,  are  active 
in  the  organism  in  which  the  transformation  to  cancer  occurs.  Such  a  process 
is  a  graded  one,  which  takes  place  step  by  step,  and  it  is  probable  that  to  the 
stage  which  has  been  reached  in  this  transformation  there  correspond  different 
degrees  of  those  characteristics  which  distinguish  tumors  from  normal  tissues. 
Prominent  among  these  characteristics  is  the  increase  in  growth  momentum 
and  the  range  of  variations  which  the  growth  momentum  may  undergo,  and 
it  is  probable  also  that  the  ability  to  undergo  adaptive  changes  was  acquired,  or 
at  least  intensified,  during  the  cancerous  transformation. 

That  adaptive  changes  to  conditions  otherwise  injurious  may  be  effected  in 
tumor  cells  has  been  shown  in  a  more  direct  way  in  experiments  by  Fleisher 
and  the  writer.  We  observed  that  intravenous  injections  of  solutions  of 
colloidal  copper  into  mice  diminish  the  growth-rapidity  of  a  mammary  gland 
carcinoma  in  these  animals;  but  if  tumors  that  have  been  subjected  to  the 
influence  of  colloidal  copper  for  some  time,  are  then  transplanted  into  other 
mice  which  subsequently  were  injected  with  solutions  of  this  substance,  the 
developing  tumors  were  found  to  be  more  resistant  to  the  action  of  colloidal 
copper  than  a  line  of  transplanted  carcinomas  which  had  not  previously  been 
treated  in  this  way.  Similar  effects  were  noted  when  hirudin  was  substituted 
for  colloidal  copper.  Both  of  these  substances  immunized  the  tumor  cells  in  a 
specific  manner.  A  corresponding  decrease  in  the  effectiveness  of  these  tumor 
growth-inhibiting  agencies  could  be  observed  if  mice  bearing  adenocarcinoma 
No.  IX  were  injected  with  either  of  these  two  substances  from  the  second  to 
the  sixth  day  following  transplantation,  and  again  from  the  ninth  to  the  thir- 
teenth day;  the  effect  of  the  second  series  of  injections  was  diminished 
as  the  result  of  the  immunizing  influence  of  the  early  injections.  This 
immunization  affected  the  bearer  of  the  tumor  as  well  as  the  tumor  itself. 
Likewise,  some  more  recent  experiments  of  Lignac  suggest  that  the  cells  of  a 
mouse  sarcoma  may  adapt  themselves  to  the  action  of  trypan  blue  injected  into 
mice ;  here,  also,  it  seems  that  we  have  to  deal  with  an  immunization  of  tumor 
cells.  Apparently,  then,  tumor  cells  may  behave  in  a  similar  manner  to  try- 
panosomes,  which  also  may  become  adapted  to  various  injurious  substances, 
such  as  trypanicidal  preparations  of  arsenic. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  the  increase  which  in  many  instances  takes  place 
in  the  growth  energy  and  in  the  number  of  growing  tumors  following  trans- 
plantation of  spontaneous  tumors,  is  due  to  different  factors  which  have  to  be 
kept  distinct.  In  the  first  place,  the  process  of  transplantation  as  such  produces 
an  augmented  growth  energy ;  this  may  be  due  to  mechanical  stimulations 
similar  to  those  which  induce  regenerative  growth.  In  addition  there  may, 
under  certain  conditions,  come  into  play  perhaps  a  direct  stimulating  effect  of 


396  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

a  strange  individuality  differential.  This  increase  in  growth  energy,  other 
factors  being  equal,  must  lead  to  an  increase  in  the  number  of  developing 
tumors,  and  indeed,  under  these  conditions  there  can  be  observed  a  paral- 
lelism between  increase  in  growth  energy  and  number  of  takes.  Secondly, 
there  may  take  place  in  the  tumor  more  specific  changes  of  an  adaptive 
character ;  the  strange  individuality  differential  of  the  host  seems  to  alter  the 
tumor  in  such  a  way  that  it  becomes  less  sensitive  to  the  injurious  action  of 
the  strange  differential.  In  diminishing  the  injurious  effects  of  the  host  this 
change  itself  also  may,  under  certain  circumstances,  secondarily  cause  an 
increase  in  the  growth  energy  of  the  transplant.  Whether  a  strange  differential 
will  act  merely  injuriously  on  a  tumor,  whether  it  will  also  have  a  stimulating 
effect,  or  whether,  in  the  end,  it  will  produce  adaptive  changes,  depends  pre- 
sumably upon  quantitative  relations  between  the  degree  of  strangeness  of  the 
individuality  differentials  and  the  inherited  power  of  resistance  and  other  in- 
herited characteristics,  such  as  a  certain  modifiability  of  the  tumor  cells. 

It  may  then  be  stated  that  transplantability,  as  judged  by  the  number  of 
takes  of  a  tumor,  is  contingent  largely  on  the  relation  between  the  organismal 
differentials  in  host  and  transplant,  and  on  the  ability  of  the  tumor  cells  to  with- 
stand injurious  influences  of  not  well  suited  organismal  differentials.  The 
latter  factor  depends,  among  other  conditions,  also  on  the  actual  or  potential 
growth  energy  of  a  tumor  and  on  the  ability  of  the  tumor  cells  to  undergo 
adaptive  changes  in  different  environments.  The  organismal  differentials  in 
host  and  tumor  are  determined  directly  by  their  genetic  constitution,  but  the 
range  of  the  potentiality  of  adaptation,  the  increased  growth  momentum, 
and  the  ability  to  undergo  variations  in  growth  energy  are  only  indirectly  de- 
termined by  genetic  factors  transmitted  by  the  germ  cells ;  directly,  they  are 
determined  by  environmental  factors  which  are  active  during  the  transforma- 
tion of  normal  into  cancerous  tissues. 

This  relatively  high  degree  of  adaptability  to  different  environmental  condi- 
tions which  we  observed  in  tumors,  distinguishes  them  from  normal  tissues, 
in  which  such  an  adaptive,  plastic  character  of  the  cells  cannot  be  demon- 
strated. For  instance,  attempts  to  overcome  the  action  of  unfavorable  individu- 
ality differentials  in  the  host  by  serial  transplantation  of  normal  tissues  did 
not  succeed.  Thus,  in  our  serial  transplantations  of  epidermis  the  transplants 
soon  died  and  while  we  found  that  cartilage  cells  could  be  transplanted 
serially  and  live  for  a  long  time — much  longer  than  the  animal  in  which  this 
tissue  originated — in  the  end  they  also  died  and  the  serial  transplantation 
ended.  It  is  possible  that  this  difference  between  normal  and  tumor  tissues  is 
due  to  the  difference  in  the  growth  energy  which  exists  between  these  types  of 
tissues.  The  greater  growth  energy  which  cancers  possess  makes  it  possible 
for  them  to  resist  difficulties  which  would  destroy  normal  tissues,  and  gives 
the  former  a  chance  to  react  to  a  new  environment  with  adaptive  changes.  But 
there  is  also  the  probability  that  the  changes  which  take  place  in  normal  tissues 
when  they  are  transformed  into  tumor  tissues,  introduce  at  the  same  time  a 
new  type  of  adaptability  to  strange  organismal  differentials,  which  normal 
cells  do  not  yet  possess ;  this  power  of  adaptation  would  then  represent  a  newly 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  397 

acquired  characteristic  of  tumors  which  distinguishes  them  from  normal 
tissues. 

However,  there  are  some  indications  that  also  in  normal  tissues  of  higher 
organisms  some  processes  of  adaptation  may  take  place.  If  we  stimulate  the 
thyroid  gland  of  the  guinea  pig  by  means  of  iodine  or  anterior  hypophyseal 
extracts,  the  stimulating  effect  ceases  after  some  time  and  at  last,  after  con- 
tinued applications  of  these  substances,  a  refractory  state  with  less  than  the 
normal  reactivity  ensues.  It  is  probable  that  in  this  case  adaptive  changes  which 
occur  in  the  cells  exposed  to  such  stimulating  substances  are  responsible,  at 
least  in  part,  for  the  condition  of  tolerance  attained.  Similarly,  if  a  piece  of 
homoiotransplanted  cartilage  is  left  for  a  long  time  in  the  host,  the  reactions  on 
the  part  of  the  host  tissue  against  the  transplant,  instead  of  increasing  or 
showing  a  cumulative  effect  with  increasing  length  of  time,  seem,  as  a  rule, 
to  diminish  in  intensity.  But,  here,  it  is  not  certain  how  far  the  diminution 
in  reaction  is  due  to  adaptive  changes  in  the  host  or  in  the  transplant. 

Reference  has  also  been  made  in  an  earlier  chapter  to  the  observations  of 
Rhoda  Erdman  and  Gassul,  that  a  gradual  adaptation  of  anuran  amphibian 
skin  to  heterogenous  amphibian  anuran  hosts  may  be  accomplished  by  cultivat- 
ing the  former  for  some  time  in  vitro  in  culture  media,  which  were  rendered 
more  unsuitable  through  step-by-step  addition  of  the  foreign  plasma  from  the 
species  to  which  it  was  desired  to  adapt  the  skin.  But  in  these  experiments 
it  is  not  certain  that  adaptive  changes  had  actually  taken  place  in  the  trans- 
planted tissue. 

Somewhat  related  investigations  were  carried  out  subsequently  by  Kimura, 
who  cultivated  chicken  tissue  in  vitro  in  duck  plasma  and  tissue  extract.  The 
chicken  tissue  thus  prepared  was  used  as  antigen  for  the  production  of 
precipitins.  These  precipitins  reacted  with  duck  instead  of  with  chicken 
antigens.  Kimura  concluded  therefore  that  chicken  tissue  had  assumed  the 
characteristics  of  duck  tissue  as  a  result  of  adaptive  changes  taking  place  in  the 
new  heterogenous  environment.  However,  instead  of  assuming  so  fargoing  a 
change  in  the  species  differential  of  the  chicken  tissue  within  a  relatively  short 
period,  the  possibility  may  be  considered  that  some  duck  plasma  was  admixed 
to  the  chicken  tissue  serving  as  antigen  and  that  the  adhering  duck  plasma  was 
responsible  for  the  production  of  the  precipitins.  That  such  a  transformation 
of  the  individuality  differential  does  not  actually  take  place  is  also  indicated 
by  an  experiment  of  A.  Fischer,  in  which  he  showed  that  rat  fibroblasts,  which 
had  been  cultivated  for  more  then  twenty-three  years  in  chicken  plasma,  still 
remained  rat  cells ;  they  retained  their  species  differential  and  cytotoxic  im- 
mune serum  directed  against  rat  tissues  injured  the  rat  cells  that  had  pre- 
viously grown  in  chicken  plasma  in  the  same  specific  way  as  it  injured  fresh 
rat  cells.  In  both  the  case  of  tumor  tissues  and  of  normal  tissues  we  arrive, 
therefore,  at  the  conclusion  that  in  all  probability  definite  changes  in  the  species 
differential  do  not  take  place  in  the  course  of  serial  transplantation,  and  that 
the  adaptive  changes  occurring  in  transplanted  tumors  under  certain  condi- 
tions are  not  due  to  somatic  mutations. 

In  the  experiments  which  we  have  discussed  so  far,  an  adaptation  of  tumor 


398  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

cells  to  a  different  type  of  host  was  produced  experimentally,  or  in  other  cases, 
the  reactivity  of  the  host  against  the  cancerous  transplants  was  diminished 
through  injection  of  substances  which  in  all  probability  inactivated  the 
reticulo-endothelial  system  of  the  host.  We  have  also  referred  to  experiments 
in  which  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  transplanted  cartilage  became 
weaker  in  the  course  of  time,  thus  indicating  possible  processes  of  adaptation 
which  took  place  in  the  host  under  the  influence  of  the  transplant.  Quite 
recently,  Cloudman  has  published  some  experiments  which  point  perhaps  in 
the  same  direction.  He  found  that  an  osteogenic  sarcoma,  which  had  originated 
in  the  tail  of  a  C57  mouse  and  grew  in  100  per  cent  of  C57  mice  inoculated 
with  this  tumor  but  grew  in  a  much  smaller  percentage  in  D  mice,  took  in  a 
somewhat  larger  percentage  of  D  mice  which  had  been  transferred  at  the 
beginning  of  their  embryonal  development  into  the  uterus  of  C57  mice  and  had 
undergone  further  developments  here  instead  of  in  the  uterus  of  their  real 
mother.  While  this  treatment  increased  the  number  of  successful  inocula- 
tions and  also  the  rapidity  of  growth  of  the  transplanted  tumors,  the 
growth  of  the  sarcoma  was  not  decreased  thereby  in  C57  mice  which  had 
developed  in  the  uterus  of  D  mice.  Corresponding  results  were  obtained 
in  experiments  with  a  malignant  melanoma  which  had  originated  in  the 
tail  of  a  D  mouse,  and  perhaps  also  in  experiments  in  which  Law  increased 
by  means  of  foster-nursing  the  number  of  successful  transplantations  of 
leukemic  cells  in  mice  belonging  to  a  subline  of  the  D  strain,  which  differed 
from  the  one  in  which  the  leukemia  had  originated  and  which  was  less  favor- 
able for  the  transplantation  of  the  leukemic  cells  possessing  a  different 
individuality  differential.  It  is  possible  that  the  transfer  of  substances  possess- 
ing a  different  individuality  differential  by  way  of  the  uterus  or  by  way  of  the 
milk  of  the  mother  caused  an  adaptation  of  the  host  against  these  substances, 
which  was  thus  rendered  more  tolerant  against  the  strange  individuality  differ- 
ential of  the  tumor  cells.  But  it  is  also  possible  that  the  substance  thus  trans- 
ferred into  the  mice  serving  as  hosts  supplied  the  latter  with  a  carrier  of  the 
individuality  differential  more  closely  related  to  that  of  the  tumor  cells  which 
the  latter  needed  for  a  successful  growth,  or  that  substances  introduced  into 
the  future  hosts  by  way  of  the  uterus  or  with  the  milk  of  the  nursing  mother 
supplied  the  hosts  with  an  agent  which  stimulated  the  growth  of  the  sub- 
sequently transplanted  cells.  There  are  indications  that  the  effect  observed  in 
these  experiments  is  only  a  temporary  one ;  mice  which  were  inoculated  with 
the  tumor  several  months  after  they  had  received  the  strange  substance  no 
longer  reacted  favorably  to  the  transplanted  tumor.  However,  it  is  not  yet 
certain  whether  this  loss  of  tolerance  was  due  to  the  older  age  of  the  mice 
under  these  conditions,  or  whether  it  was  due  to  the  fact  that  the  strange  sub- 
stance was  gradually  eliminated.  All  these  experiments  taken  together  do  not, 
therefore,  suggest  that  variations  in  the  growth  energy  or  in  the  percentage 
of  successful  transplantations  of  a  tumor  are  due  to  changes  in  the  organismal 
differentials  in  the  host  or  in  the  transplant;  but  they  point  to  the  presence 
of  factors,  which,  when  added  to  the  action  of  these  differentials,  may  modify 
the  mode  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  transplant. 


TRANSPLANTATION  OF  TUMORS  399 

In  comparing  the  conditions  which  influence  the  transplantation  of  normal 
tissues  and  of  tumor  tissues,  we  conclude  that  in  both  of  these  processes  the 
relations  between  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  play  a  similar 
role,  but  that  various  factors  of  a  secondary  nature  may  obscure  the  signifi- 
cance of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  this  applies  particularly  to  tumor 
growth.  The  conditions  determining  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors  include 
the  factors  which  control  the  growth  of  normal  tissues,  as  well  as  other 
factors  which  are  specific  for  tumor  tissue,  such  as  the  intensified  growth 
momentum,  the  possibility  of  increasing  this  growth  momentum  still  further, 
and  the  potentiality  to  undergo  special  adaptations  in  the  course  of  serial  trans- 
plantations. In  the  analysis  of  tumor  growth  and  tumor  transplantations,  it 
is  necessary  to  separate  these  various  factors  as  much  as  is  possible  at  the 
present  time. 


Chapter  4. 

Immunity  and  Organismal  Differentials 
in  Tumor  Transplantation 

In  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  analyzed  the  relation  between  the 
transplantability  of  tumors  and  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  organisms 
in  which  the  tumors  originated,  as  well  as  of  the  hosts,  and  the  indi- 
viduality and  species  differentials  of  these  organisms.  It  has  been  stated 
already  that  also  immunity  against  cancer  grafts  may  be  an  expression  of 
the  organismal  differentials  and  from  this  point  of  view  various  aspects 
of  this  type  of  immunity  will  now  be  considered.  We  shall  study,  therefore, 
mainly  those  phenomena  in  immunity  which  have  a  bearing  on  the  role 
which  organismal  differentials  play  in  tumor  growth,  in  particular,  the  con- 
stituents of  strange  organismal  differentials  which  may  readily  function  as 
antigens  and  thus  induce  immunity  against  grafted  tumors. 

Early  investigators  in  this  field,  Jensen,  Ehrlich  and  Apolant,  Bashford 
and  Murray,  applied  the  principles  established  in  the  study  of  immunity 
against  microorganisms,  animal  cells  and  proteins  to  the  study  of  immunity 
against  transplanted  cancer.  At  an  early  stage  of  these  investigations,  a  nat- 
ural immunity  and  an  acquired  immunity  to  microorganisms  and  their 
toxins  were  distinguished.  By  natural  immunity  is  understood  a  preformed 
constitutional  resistance.  The  development  of  an  active  immunity,  on  the 
other  hand,  presupposes  a  previous  interaction  between  the  host  organism 
and  the  strange  cells  or  substances  against  which  the  immunity  is  acquired. 
In  active  immunity,  substances  (immune  substances,  antibodies)  may  be 
produced,  which  circulate  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host  and  tend  to  injure  the 
strange  cells  or  to  neutralize  those  substances  (antigens)  which  elicited  the 
immune  reaction.  By  injecting  these  bodyfluids  of  the  actively  immunized 
animals  into  other  animals  it  is  possible  to  transfer  the  immunity  to  the 
latter,  which  thus  acquires  a  passive  immunity.  We  have  already  discussed 
some  of  the  conditions  on  which  depends  the  existence  or  lack  of  natural 
immunity  to  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors,  namely,  the  relations  be- 
tween the  constitutional  genetic  factors  in  the  tumors,  which  are  to  be 
transplanted,  and  in  the  hosts,  into  which  they  are  to  be  transferred;  the 
latter  may  be  individuals  of  the  same  strain  or  species  in  which  the  tumors 
originated,  or  individuals  of  different  strains  or  species.  The  resistance  to 
homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  transplantation  may  thus  be  considered  pri- 
marily as  a  manifestation  of  natural  immunity,  which  depends  on  the  relation 
between  the  individuality  and  species  differentials  of  the  host  and  transplant. 
Especially  striking  in  this  connection  are  the  differences  between  the  results 
of  auto-  and  homoiotransplantation.  Here,  reference  may  again  be  made  to 
the  experiment  in  which  Fleisher  and  the  writer  showed  that  the  immunity 

400 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  401 

which  becomes  manifest  after  extirpation  of  a  homoiogenous  tumor  does  not 
affect  an  autogenous  tumor  growing  at  the  same  time  in  the  bearer  of  the 
homoiogenous  tumor,  nor  is  the  extirpation  of  an  autogenous  tumor  followed 
by  immunity  against  inoculation  with  a  homoiogenous  tumor. 

The  observation  of  the  writer  and  of  Jensen,  that  in  animals  in  which 
a  first  inoculation  of  a  homoiogenous  piece  of  tumor  was  not  followed  by 
tumor  formation,  a  second  inoculation  of  a  homoiogenous  piece  was  also 
unsuccessful,  suggested  to  Jensen  the  idea  that  as  a  result  of  the  first  inocu- 
lation immune  bodies  developed  in  the  animal,  which  protected  it  against  a 
second  inoculation,  and  that  the  phenomena  apparently  attributable  to  natural 
immunity  did  in  reality  represent  an  acquired  immunity.  Subsequently,  it  was 
observed  however  that  under  the  conditions  of  Jensen's  experiments  immune 
bodies  cannot  be  demonstrated  in  the  blood  of  the  inoculated  animal.  Jensen's 
work  was  the  starting  point  for  the  investigations  of  Ehrlich  and  Bashford, 
and  their  collaborators.  Ehrlich  and  Apolant,  extending  to  natural  immunity 
against  transplanted  tumors  their  conception  of  natural  immunity  against 
microorganisms,  assumed  that  specific  X  substances  are  needed  to  allow,  in 
a  certain  host,  the  growth  of  bacteria  as  well  as  of  tumor  cells.  If  there  is 
an  insufficient  amount  of  such  an  X  substance  present,  a  state  of  athrepsia 
exists  in  the  host  as  far  as  the  microorganisms  or  cancer  cells  are  concerned 
and  they  are  therefore  prevented  from  growing  in  this  host.  Other  investiga- 
tors have  attributed  the  natural  immunity  against  transplanted  tumors  to  the 
action  of  lymphocytes,  and  this  factor  they  held  responsible  also  for  the  de- 
velopment of  an  active  acquired  immunity  against  canter.  Thus,  in  the  case  of 
the  Rous  chicken  sarcoma  it  was  observed  that  in  naturally  immune  fowl 
lymphocytes  collected  around  the  tumor  transplant ;  it  resembled  in  this  respect 
transplanted  normal  tissue,  where  likewise  lymphocytes  play  a  significant  role. 

When  it  was  found  that  it  is  possible  in  a  certain  percentage  of  animals, 
which  varies  in  different  cases  in  accordance  with  the  kind  of  tumor  or  host 
used,  to  produce  an  active  immunity  through  inoculation  of  normal  tissues 
or  of  certain  kinds  of  tumor  tissue,  the  view  was  expressed  by  Russell  that 
all  natural  immunity  against  tumor  grafts  is  in  reality  a  manifestation  of 
active  immunity,  due  to  the  absorption  of  a  certain  amount  of  the  inoculated 
piece,  which  thus  acts  at  the  same  time  as  an  antigen.  Whether  an  animal 
proved  to  be  naturally  resistant  (immune)  or  not  depended  therefore  upon 
its  ability  to  develop  an  active  immunity.  This  conclusion  of  Russell,  which 
represents  an  extension  of  Jensen's  view,  was  very  widely  accepted  and  has 
found  expression  even  in  recent  literature.  However,  while  active  immunity 
undoubtedly  plays  an  important  role  in  determining  the  fate  of  transplanted 
tumors,  this  interpretation  does  not  explain  why  certain  individuals  should 
develop  an  active  immunity,  whereas  others  are  not  able  to  do  so,  and  this  is 
the  important  point  which  needs  to  be  elucidated.  In  the  case  of  normal  tissues 
we  have  seen  that  such  an  interpretation  would  be  inadequate.  Here,  the 
primary  relation  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant 
is  the  determining  factor,  and  tumor  tissue  has  retained  in  many  essential 
respects  the  characteristics  of  normal  tissues,  with  the  addition  of  certain 


402  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

peculiarities  secondarily  acquired.  Also,  in  the  case  of  transplanted  tumors 
an  active  immunity  develops  only  if  there  exists  a  primary  incompatibility 
of  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  although  such  a  primary 
incompatibility  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant 
may  in  certain  cases  be  insufficient  to  prevent  the  growth  of  implanted  tumors. 
But,  as  we  have  stated  already,  with  tumors  an  active  immunity  seems  to  be 
of  much  greater  importance  in  preventing  the  growth  of  the  transplant  than 
with  normal  tissues. 

In  the  majority  of  cases  it  seems  to  be  the  strange  organismal  differentials, 
and  in  particular  the  strange  individuality  differentials,  which  serve  as  antigens 
in  the  production  of  an  active  immunity.  Therefore,  under  normal  conditions 
no  immunity  develops  in  mammals  against  autogenous  spontaneous  tumors; 
they  are  not  antigenic.  Conversely,  because  autogenous  tumor  tissue  does  not 
elicit  immunity  against  itself  in  the  bearer  of  the  tumor,  it  may  be  assumed 
that  the  tumor  tissue  has  essentially  the  same  individuality  differential  as  the 
other  cells  of  the  same  organism.  However,  it  has  been  shown  that  avian 
sarcomata  and  related  tumors,  produced  by  means  of  injections  of  tumor 
filtrates,  may  give  origin  to  antibodies  which  are  active  against  the  autogenous 
tumor  cells ;  but  these  antibodies  are  directed  against  the  agent  and  not  against 
the  tumor  cells.  Furthermore,  there  has  accumulated  more  recently  some 
evidence  which  proves  that  in  mammalian  tumor  tissue  there  may  be  present 
in  addition  to  the  organismal  differentials,  some  antigens  which  are  specific 
for  a  certain  kind  of  tumor  and  not  for  the  corresponding  normal  tissue,  and 
perhaps  others  which  are  common  to  many  different  types  of  cancer.  In  these 
cases,  special  substances  may  serve  as  antigens. 

There  has  been  a  certain  reluctance  on  the  part  of  some  investigators, 
especially  Bashford  and  his  associates,  to  apply  the  term  "immunity"  to  the 
mechanisms  underlying  the  reactions  against  tumors  developing  in  animals 
inoculated  with  the  latter.  They  preferred  the  term  "resistance,"  because  in 
the  course  of  time  they  began  to  doubt  that  a  typical  immunity,  comparable 
to  antibacterial  immunity,  develops  at  all  against  cancer  cells.  This  doubt  was 
based  on  the  impossibility  of  demonstrating  immune  substances  in  the  host 
inoculated  with  homoiogenous  tumors  and  of  transferring  antibodies  to  other 
animals,  which  thus  would  be  protected  against  the  growth  of  a  second 
homoiogenous  tumor.  However,  this  difficulty  has  disappeared  in  recent  years, 
since  it  has  become  possible  in  various  ways  to  demonstrate  that  such  protec- 
tive substances  are  formed.  We  therefore  need  not  hesitate  to  consider  these 
reactions  against  tumor  grafts  as  evidence  of  an  active  immunity.  The 
processes  of  active  immunity  are  of  special  importance  as  far  as  the  reactions 
against  homoiogenous  tumors  are  concerned.  In  heterogenous  tumors  the 
primary  incompatibilities  between  host  and  graft  become  so  strong,  particu- 
larly with  increasing  distance  between  the  species  of  the  host  and  the  bearer, 
that  preformed  processes  may  be  sufficient  to  injure  and  kill  the  transplants. 

An  active  immunity  against  inoculated  tumors  may  be  obtained  under  the 
following  conditions :  ( 1 )  When  a  transplanted  tumor  grows  in  an  animal ; 
the  developing  immunity  is  known  as  "concomitant  immunity";  (2)  in  cer- 
tain cases  following  the  extirpation  of  a  growing  homoiogenous  tumor;  here 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  403 

an  active  immunity  which  had  not  been  demonstrated  previously  may  become 
manifest,  but  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  it  was  actually  present  already 
while  the  tumor  was  growing  in  the  host;  (3)  after  regression  of  a  homoiog- 
enous  or  heterogenous  tumor,  when  an  animal  as  a  rule  is  found  to  be 
immune  to  a  second  inoculation  of  the  same  or  of  a  similar  kind  of  tumor; 
(4)  after  inoculation  of  normal  tissues  or  of  pieces  of  tumor  unable  to  give 
rise  to  the  formation  of  tumors ;  to  a  certain  extent,  animals  thus  treated  are 
immune  to  the  growth  of  a  piece  of  tumor  subsequently  inoculated.  We  shall 
now  describe  the  essential  characteristics  of  each  of  these  types  of  active 
acquired  immunity,  and  shall  also  discuss  (5)  the  presence  of  immune  sub- 
stances in  the  bodyfluids  or  tissue  extracts  of  an  animal  which  has  acquired 
an  active  immunity  against  a  tumor,  as  well  as  (6)  the  significance  for  im- 
munity of  cellular  reactions  in  the  host  against  tumor  transplants  and  lastly 
(7)  the  presence  in  tumor  cells  of  antigens  other  than  organismal  differ- 
entials. 

(1)  Concomitant  immunity.  From  a  theoretical  point  of  view,  this  is  per- 
haps the  most  important  and  most  generally  occurring  type  of  active  acquired 
immunity.  It  can  be  tested  by  inoculating  animals,  which  already  are  the 
bearers  of  such  transplanted  tumors,  a  second  time  with  tumor  pieces  and 
comparing  the  number  of  takes  and  the'  growth  energy  of  the  second  tumors 
with  those  of  the  first.  This  immunity  is  elicited  only  if  the  organismal  differ- 
entials of  host  and  transplant  differ,  and  is  demonstrated  the  more  readily, 
the  greater  the  difference  between  the  organismal  differentials.  It  is  very 
marked  when  a  tumor  grows  for  some  time  in  a  heterogenous  host ;  homoiog- 
enous  tumors  also  give  rise  to  immunity,  but  the  growth  of  an  autogenous 
tumor  graft  does  not  have  this  effect,  nor  is  it  observed  if  a  spontaneous  tumor 
is  propagated  through  transplantation  in  the  same  closely  inbred,  homozygous 
strain  in  which  it  originated. 

As  we  have  seen  in  a  preceding  chapter,  the  experiments  of  Fleisher  and 
the  writer,  as  well  as  those  of  Haaland,  prove  that  the  growth  of  an  autogenous 
spontaneous  tumor  does  not  influence  the  subsequent  development  of  a 
homoiogenous  inoculated  tumor;  conversely,  the  growth  of  a  homoiogenous 
tumor  does  not  affect  the  growth  of  autogenous  tumor  transplants  and  of 
metastases  from  the  autogenous  tumor. 

However,  in  addition  to  differences  in  organismal  differentials  between 
host  and  transplant,  other  factors  may  enter  into  the  production  of  con- 
comitant immunity.  This  is  clear  if  we  compare  the  varying  conditions  under 
which  this  type  of  immunity  has  been  observed.  Strieker  noted  that  at  a  cer- 
tain period  in  the  growth  of  a  homoiogenous  lymphosarcoma  in  a  dog,  im- 
munity against  a  second  inoculation  developed,  and  Ehrlich  found  that  the 
growth  of  a  rapidly  growing  tumor  inhibited  the  growth  of  a  tumor  of  the 
same  kind  subsequently  inoculated.  According  to  Ehrlich  and  Schoene,  the 
extirpation  of  the  first  tumor  suspends  this  immunity  and  makes  possible  an 
inoculation  with  a  second  tumor.  Ehrlich  held  that  the  first  actively  growing 
tumor  used  for  its  own  growth  all  available  growth-substances  specifically 
required  for  the  multiplication  of  tumor  cells,  and  thus  prevented  the  growth 
of  a  second  tumor  (athreptic  immunity).  That  this  interpretation  does  not 


404  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

apply  generally  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the  writer,  as  well  as  Jensen, 
observed  that  successive  inoculation  of  tumors  into  the  same  animal  led  in 
some  cases  to  the  growth  of  both  tumors;  and  Russell,  as  well  as  Tyzzer, 
found  that  there  are  actively  growing  tumor  grafts  which  apparently  do  not 
produce  immunity  in  the  host.  Russell  distinguished,  therefore,  tumors  which 
as  a  result  of  their  growth,  conferred  concomitant  immunity,  and  others  which 
did  not  confer  such  an  immunity.  In  addition,  there  were  tumors  which 
showed  an  intermediate  behavior.  However,  there  is  reason  for  assuming 
that  all  growing  homoiogenous  tumors  are  able  to  induce  active  immunity 
against  secondarily  transplanted  homoiogenous  tumors,  but  that  the  degree  of 
this  immunity  varies  in  different  cases  and  that  the  presence  of  such  an  im- 
munity may  not  always  become  manifest.  If  a  tumor  originates  in  a  strain  of 
animals  in  which,  as  the  result  of  long-continued,  very  close  inbreeding,  the 
individuality  differentials  in  the  various  animals  have  become  very  similar, 
then  the  individuality  differentials  of  tumors  which  originate  in  such  a  strain 
are  about  the  same  as  those  of  the  animals  constituting  this  strain,  and  such 
tumors  after  transplantation  into  members  of  this  homozygous  strain  behave, 
therefore,  about  like  autogenous  tumors,  which  have  no  antigenic  power. 

After  transplantation  into  a  strange,  closely  inbred  strain,  the  large  ma- 
jority of  tumors  do  not  show  continued  growth ;  they  may  grow  for  a  short 
time  and  then  retrogress  and  disappear,  or  may  show  a  slightly  longer  initial 
growth.  Similarly  after  transplantation  into  only  partly  inbred  strains,  not 
yet  approaching  homozygosity,  the  majority  of  primary  (spontaneous)  tumors 
do  not  take.  But  as  we  have  discussed  already  in  the  preceding  chapters,  dif- 
ferent tumors  differ  very  much  in  this  respect.  There  are  some  tumors  which 
can  be  transplanted  into  almost  all  homoiogenous  animals  and  others  which 
may  be  transplanted  in  various  proportions  into  such  animals.  Furthermore, 
there  exist  differences  between  different  strains  of  animals  serving  as  hosts ;  a 
certain  tumor  which  originated  in  an  American  mouse  may  be  transplanted 
into  a  considerable  number  of  American  mice,  but  not  at  all  or  only  into  a  very 
small  number  of  some  European  strains.  These  differences  in  transplantability 
depend  partly  on  the  relations  and  the  degrees  of  mutual  strangeness  between 
the  individuality  differentials  of  hosts  and  transplants;  but  there  enter  also 
other  factors,  such  as  the  growth  momentum  of  the  tumors,  variations  in  their 
sensitiveness  and  power  of  resistance  to  injurious  substances,  and  lastly,  in 
their  ability  to  adapt  themselves  to  new  hosts  bearing  individuality  differen- 
tials of  different  degrees  of  strangeness.  Moreover,  different  strains  of  hosts 
and  different  individual  animals  may  not  have  the  same  ability  to  react  against 
and  to  injure  a  transplant  carrying  a  strange  individuality  differential.  While 
the  significance  of  these  factors  has  not  yet  been  analyzed  sufficiently  in  the 
recorded  series  of  transplantations,  and  while  it  is  not  yet  possible  to  determine 
in  most  cases  how  much  importance  is  to  be  attributed  to  one  or  the  other  of 
these  factors,  there  is  enough  evidence  at  hand  to  warrant  the  conclusion  that 
they  play  a  role  under  various  conditions. 

To  return  now  to  the  discussion  of  concomitant  immunity.  We  have  seen 
that  the  prerequisite  for  the  development  of  this  type  of  immunity  is  a  differ- 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  405 

ence  in  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  which  makes  it 
possible  for  constituents  of  the  transplant  to  act  as  antigens  in  the  host.  Inas- 
much as  the  constitution  of  the  individuality  differential  depends  upon  the 
genetic  constitution  of  the  organism  which  is  the  bearer  of  the  individuality 
differential,  it  may  also  be  stated  that  certain  genetic  differences  between  host 
and  transplant  make  it  possible  for  constituents  of  the  latter  to  act  as  antigens 
and  to  call  forth  processes  of  immunity  in  the  host  which  become  manifest  if 
repeated  transplantations  of  homoiogenous  tumors  are  made.  It  should  then  be 
possible  to  demonstrate  the  presence  of  concomitant  immunity  in  all  cases  in 
which  a  tumor  grows  in  an  animal  whose  individuality  differential  differs  to  a 
sufficient  degree  from  its  own.  Experience,  however,  indicates  that  only  in 
certain  cases  in  which  a  homoiogenous  tumor  grows  in  an  animal  bearing  a 
different  individuality  differential,  can  such  a  concomitant  immunity  be 
shown.  In  other  cases,  the  presence  of  immune  processes  becomes  apparent  in 
an  animal  only  after  the  successfully  growing  tumor  has  been  completely  ex- 
tirpated, and  in  still  others,  only  when  the  tumor  growth  comes  to  a  standstill 
and,  in  the  end,  the  tumor  retrogresses.  In  the  latter  instance,  after  such  a 
retrogression  has  taken  place,  immunity  against  a  second  homoiogenous  trans- 
plant can  be  shown  to  exist.  It  does  not  appear  probable  that  in  these  different 
types  of  immune  reactions  we  have  to  deal  with  entirely  different  processes ; 
it  is  much  more  likely  that  they  are  merely  quantitative  variations  of  the  same 
fundamental  process.  It  is  possible  that  when  a  concomitant  immunity  be- 
comes manifest,  the  amount  of  immune  substances  produced  as  a  result  of  the 
action  of  the  strange  antigens  is  sufficiently  great  to  make  possible  the  dem- 
onstration of  these  immune  processes,  notwithstanding  the  presence  of  a  grow- 
ing tumor,  which  seems  to  have  the  tendency  to  absorb  a  certain  quantity  of 
immune  substances  and  to  make  them  innocuous.  We  may  also  assume  that 
another  type  of  tumor  may  absorb  so  great  a  proportion  of  the  immune  sub- 
stances that  the  immune  bodies  remaining  free  in  the  circulation  of  the  host 
are  unable  to  prevent  the  growth  of  a  second  homoiogenous  tumor  trans- 
planted at  a  time  when  the  first  one  is  already  growing.  Extirpation  of  the  first 
growing  tumor  would  then  make  immune  substances  available  for  the  attack 
on  the  second  tumor.  In  some  instances,  in  which  the  individuality  differentials 
of  host  and  transplant  possess  a  sufficient  degree  of  strangeness,  the  amount 
of  immune  substance  produced  in  response  to  the  first  homoiogenous  growing 
tumor  may  become  so  large  that  it  gradually  begins  to  inhibit  and  prevent  the 
further  development  of  the  first  graft,  which  then  ceases  to  grow  and  may 
even  retrogress.  The  absorption  of  this  tumor  material  would  still  further 
increase  the  strength  of  the  immune  processes,  so  that  after  retrogression  of 
this  tumor  the  animal  has  become  completely  immune  against  a  further  trans- 
plant of  a  homoiogenous  tumor.  But  there  are  other  cases  in  which,  after 
extirpation  of  a  tumor  with  its  antigens,  the  production  of  immune  substances 
becomes  so  weak  that  the  latter  are  unable  to  prevent  a  subsequent  successful 
transplantation  of  a  homoiogenous  tumor.  In  this  way  it  might  be  possible  to 
interpret  the  various  types  of  immunity  which  can  be  distinguished  as  mani- 
festations of  the  same  basic  process ;  the  differences  noted  would  then  be  due 


406  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

merely  to  quantitative  differences  in  the  intensity  of  the  immune  reactions  in 
various  animals  or  strains,  in  the  ability  of  different  kinds  of  tumors  to  neu- 
tralize the  immune  substances,  and  in  the  power  of  resistance  of  different 
tumors  to  the  injurious  action  of  such  substances.  The  immunity  found  after 
extirpation  of  a  growing  tumor  or  after  retrogression  of  a  formerly  growing 
tumor  would  then  represent  merely  quantitative  variants  of  the  same  type  of 
immunity. 

There  exist  certain  other  experimental  procedures  which  may  make  it  possi- 
ble to  prove  the  existence  of  immunity  against  a  tumor  graft.  This  may  in 
some  cases  be  accomplished  by  experimentally  weakening  the  second  tumor  in 
vitro,  previous  to  inoculation.  Also,  by  artificially  weakening  a  first  tumor  it 
may  be  possible  to  demonstrate  the  development  of  an  active  immunity,  be- 
cause under  these  conditions  the  absorbing  and  neutralizing  function  of  the 
tumor  may  be  markedly  diminished.  Through  experimental  weakening  of  the 
second  tumor  by  means  of  graded  application  of  heat  previous  to  transplan- 
tation, Fleisher,  Corson-White  and  the  writer  demonstrated  the  inhibiting 
effect  of  the  first  tumor  on  the  development  of  a  subsequently  transplanted 
tumor,  in  mouse  carcinoma  No.  IX,  in  which,  in  successive  transplantations 
of  fully  active,  unheated  tumor  pieces,  immune  processes  are  not  manifest. 
Thus  it  could  be  shown  that  a  first  unheated  tumor  possessing  its  full  growth 
energy  prevents  the  growth  of  a  second  tumor  which  has  been  exposed  to  a 
temperature  of  44°  for  a  period  of  from  thirty-five  to  forty  minutes.  It  does 
not  entirely  suppress,  but  it  weakens  the  growth  of  a  second  tumor  which  has 
been  exposed  to  a  temperature  of  44°  for  thirty  minutes.  If  the  growth  energy 
of  the  first  tumor  has  also  been  slightly  reduced  through  heating,  the  develop- 
ment of  a  second  tumor  is  prevented  only  if  its  growth  energy  has  been  dimin- 
ished quite  markedly  through  heating  for  forty  minutes.  But  if  the  first  tumor 
had  been  injured  through  heating  as  much  as  the  second  tumor,  or  even  more, 
we  then  observed  in  several  instances  the  opposite  phenomenon,  namely,  an 
increase  in  the  growth  energy  of  the  second  tumor.  Thus  one  tumor  may,  under 
certain  conditions,  have  a  beneficial  influence  on  the  growth  of  a  second  tumor, 
perhaps  owing  to  a  neutralizing  effect  on  substances  antagonistic  to  tumor 
growth  which  a  first,  weakly-growing  tumor  may  exert. 

It  seems  that  the  antigenic  function  of  a  tumor  graft  bears  some  relation  to 
the  intensity  of  its  metabolic  activity,  or  to  the  presence  of  substances  which 
are  readily  injured  by  heat  even  of  a  moderate  intensity.  The  influence  which 
the  second  tumor  exerts  on  the  first  is  less  marked,  but  an  enhancing  effect  of 
a  second,  less  inhibited  tumor  on  a  first,  weakened  tumor  has  been  observed 
also  by  Andervont  in  the  case  of  sarcoma  180.  Under  other  circumstances, 
however,  a  second  tumor  whose  growth  energy  has  been  only  moderately 
diminished  through  heating  may  be  victorious  in  competition  with  a  first,  more 
markedly  depressed  tumor ;  and  it  is  further  possible  to  produce  experimental- 
ly a  balancing  between  a  first  and  a  second  tumor.  Apparently  the  interaction 
of  two  mutually  antagonistic  processes  may  play  a  role  in  bringing  about  this 
effect,  namely,  (1)  the  production  of  immune  substances  in  the  host,  and 
(2)  their  absorption  and  neutralization  by  the  tumor,  or  perhaps  by  organismal 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  407 

differentials  which  have  been  given  off  by  the  tumor  into  the  circulation  and 
which  act  as  antigens.  Also,  Seelig  and  Fleisher  observed  such  a  balancing 
between  the  growth  energy  of  the  first  and  second  tumors  and  they  noted  that 
the  tumor  with  the  greater  growth  energy  has  the  advantage  over  a  weaker 
tumor.  In  addition,  they  found  that  intraperitoneal  inoculation  with  tumor  ma- 
terial may  exert  a  greater  immunizing  power  than  a  subcutaneous  inoculation, 
although  the  intraperitoneal  inoculation  may  not  be  followed  by  actual  growth 
of  the  carcinomatous  tissue.  In  this  case  we  may  have  to  deal  with  an  immunity 
similar  to  that  which  is  caused  by  inoculation  of  normal  or  tumor  tissues  which 
do  not  noticeably  grow. 

This  method  of  using  an  originally  active,  virulent  tumor,  after  its  growth 
energy  has  been  experimentally  reduced,  for  the  demonstration  of  immune 
processes  which  otherwise  would  not  be  manifest,  was  subsequently  employed 
also  by  Tsurumi,  as  well  as  by  Rohdenburg  and  Bullock,  and  in  a  modified 
way  by  Caspari  and  his  collaborators,  Schwarz  and  Ascoli.  Besides  grading 
the  growth  energy  by  means  of  heat,  they  accomplished  the  same  purpose  also 
by  exposing  the  tumors  to  the  action  of  radiation  or  of  various  chemicals.  Only 
when  the  inoculated  tumor  material  was  living  did  they  find  an  immunizing 
effect.  Presumably  the  injured  tumor  grew  temporarily  to  a  slight  extent,  but 
it  soon  retrogressed,  and  it  is  possible  that  the  immunization  was  accomplished 
by  living  but  not  growing  material.  However,  the  essential  point  is  that  a 
balancing  may  take  place  between  the  first  and  second  tumor  pieces  in  ac- 
cordance with  the  degree  of  potential  growth  energy  which  each  inoculated 
piece  possesses;  and  Caspari  and  Ascoli  also  observed  such  an  effect.  The 
greater  the  growth  energy  of  the  first  piece,  the  more  it  tends  to  diminish  the 
growth  energy  of  the  tumor  developing  from  the  second  piece ;  furthermore, 
the  influence  of  the  first  piece  is  inversely  proportional  to  the  growth  energy 
of  the  second.  In  a  similar  manner  Lumsden  has  recently  demonstrated  that 
by  weakening  the  growth  of  a  second  transplanted  piece  of  cancerous  tissue 
in  various  other  ways,  such  as  by  inoculation  in  unfavorable  places,  constric- 
tion of  the  blood  vessels  leading  to  the  tumor,  by  means  of  ligatures,  and  in- 
jection of  formalin  into  the  transplant,  it  is  possible  to  prove  that  tumors  like 
the  Twort  mouse  carcinoma  or  mouse  carcinoma  63,  which,  according  to  Rus- 
sell, belong  to  the  type  of  tumors  which  do  not  elicit  concomitant  immunity, 
may  give  rise  to  such  an  immunity.  Of  interest  is  the  observation  of  Foulds  that 
parallel  to  changes  in  their  growth  energy,  tumors  in  the  course  of  continued 
transplantations  may  undergo  variations  in  their  power  to  elicit  concomitant 
immunity.  The  effects  which  a  first  growing  tumor  exerts  on  a  second  one 
may  further  depend  also  on  the  kind  of  tumors  used.  For  instance,  the  growth 
of  a  secondarily  transplanted  mouse  chondroma,  a  very  slow-growing  tumor, 
was  apparently  not  affected  by  a  first  tumor  of  the  same  kind,  because  these 
cartilage  tumors  are  very  resistant  to  injurious  influences. 

We  may  therefore  conclude  that  even  tumors  whose  growth  apparently 
does  not  lead  to  the  development  of  immune  processes,  may  actually  have  this 
effect  provided  their  individuality  differential  differs  from  that  of  the  host. 
The  existence  of  concomitant  immunity  may  then,  in  general,  be  ascribed  to 


408  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

differences  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  host  and  transplant. 
On  the  other  hand,  Caspari  and  Schwarz  believe  that  concomitant  immunity 
is  due  to  necro-hormones  given  off  by  the  growing  tumor  and  that  the  greater 
immunizing  power  of  a  rapidly  growing  tumor  is  dependent  on  the  more  ex- 
tensive necrosis  which  occurs  in  the  central  portions  of  such  tumors. 

(2)  Immunity  following  extirpation  of  a  tumor.  We  have  already  referred 
to  this  kind  of  immunity  as  representing  a  variety  of  concomitant  immunity, 
which  becomes  manifest  only  after  extirpation  of  the  first  tumor.  Uhlenhuth, 
Haendal  and  Steffenhagen  have  shown  that  when  homoiogenous  rat  sarcomata 
growing  in  rats  were  excised,  the  rats  were  thereby  rendered  immune  to  re- 
inoculation  with  this  type  of  tumor.  But,  if  the  operation  was  incomplete  and 
the  tumor  recurred,  a  second  inoculation  was  successful.  There  has  been 
much  discussion  concerning  this  experiment ;  some  have  denied  its  significance, 
or  even  its  occurrence.  However,  Fleisher  and  the  writer  were  able  to  confirm 
the  findings  of  Uhlenhuth  and  his  collaborators ;  after  extirpation  of  a  homoiog- 
enous mouse  carcinoma  No.  IX,  the  animal  became  immune  against  reinocu- 
lation  with  this  tumor.  It  is  to  be  noted,  however,  that  the  growth  of  this  type 
of  carcinoma  did  not,  under  normal  conditions,  lead  to  the  manifestation  of  a 
distinct  concomitant  immunity,  presumably  because  the  immune  substances 
are  absorbed  by  the  growing  tumor.  In  addition,  it  must  be  assumed  that  the 
production  of  immune  bodies  continues  for  some  time  after  the  source  of  the 
antigens  has  been  removed.  The  absorptive  or  neutralizing  function  of  a  first 
tumor  is  not  exercised  by  an  autogenous,  so-called  spontaneous  tumor,  the 
extirpation  of  which  does  not  elicit  processes  of  immunity  either  against  re- 
inoculation  with  autogenous  or  with  homoiogenous  tumors.  We  may  therefore 
conclude  that  the  organismal  differentials  are  involved  also  in  these  neutraliz- 
ing mechanisms  and  that,  in  particular,  homoiogenous  individuality  differen- 
tials are  able  to  neutralize  homoiogenous  immune  substances. 

(3)  Immunity  following  retrogression  of  tumors.  Homoiogenous  tumors  may 
grow  for  some  time  and  then  retrogress  apparently  spontaneously;  if  the 
tumor  pieces  used  for  inoculation  have  been  subjected  to  chemical  or  physical 
injuries  previous  to  transplantation,  such  a  retrogression  is  particularly  apt  to 
occur.  In  all  these  cases  retrogression  takes  place  because  conditions  injurious 
to  the  tumor  cells  have  had  a  depressive  effect  on  the  tumor  growth.  We 
described  a  spontaneous  retrogression  of  transplanted  tumors  in  1901.  We 
observed  also  that  during  the  first  stages  of  retrogression  mitotic  cell  prolif- 
eration may  still  proceed  quite  actively  in  the  tumor  cells  and  that  tumors  in 
the  early  stages  of  retrogression  may  be  transplanted  successfully  and  may 
subseqently  recover  their  full  vigor  of  growth ;  but  at  later  stages  of  retro- 
gression mitotic  proliferation  is  much  reduced  or  it  ceases  altogether,  and 
from  then  on  the  ability  of  the  tumor  to  recover  after  renewed  transplantation 
is  very  much  decreased.  These  observations  were  subsequently  confirmed  and 
extended  by  Woglom,  and  in  1905  Clowes  and  Baeslack  established  the  inter- 
esting fact  that  mice,  in  which  a  homoiogenous  mouse  carcinoma  had  retro- 
gressed, had  become  immune  against  re-inoculation  with  a  homoiogenous 
tumor.  In  the  case  of  heterotransplantation,  for  instance,  if  a  mouse  tumor 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  409 

is  grafted  into  a  rat,  the  tumor,  as  a  rule,  after  a  temporary  growth  retro- 
gresses, and  then  a  second  inoculation  of  a  similar  tumor  into  the  same  host 
does  not  lead  even  to  the  limited  growth  shown  by  the  first  transplant.  The 
animal  has  become  immune  as  the  result  of  the  growth  and  retrogression  of 
the  first  tumor.  In  accordance  with  what  we  know  as  to  the  inability  of  autog- 
enous tumors  to  elicit  immunity  of  this  kind,  is  the  great  infrequency  with 
which  spontaneous  tumors  retrogress;  but  if  they  do  retrogress,  this  is  pre- 
sumably brought  about  by  factors  other  than  immunity,  or  by  an  immunity 
not  directed  against  the  organismal  differentials  but  against  other  substances. 

As  stated  above,  we  must  conceive  of  the  immunity  following  retrogression 
of  a  tumor  as  a  variety  of  concomitant  immunity,  which  primarily  is  due  to 
the  dissimilarity  and  incompatibility  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  tumor 
and  host.  As  the  result  of  this  incompatibility  the  primary,  preformed  homoio- 
or  heterotoxins  of  the  host  injure  the  transplant  and  the  strange  individu- 
ality or  species  differentials  of  the  grafted  tumor  may  act  as  antigen,  eliciting 
the  production  of  immune  bodies,  which  then  support  and  complete  the  effect 
of  the  primary  homoio-  or  heterotoxins ;  and  it  is  probable  that  these  immune 
substances  are  mainly  responsible  for  the  injury  of  the  transplant  and  the 
subsequent  cessation  of  its  growth  and  its  retrogression.  In  addition,  during 
retrogression  of  the  tumor,  tumor  material  is  being  absorbed,  which  also  may 
serve  as  antigen  and  cause  additional  formation  of  antibodies. 

The  retrogression  immunity  is  very  effective  and  may  cause  the  shrinking 
and  the  ultimate  disappearance  of  tumors  which  had  already  been  established 
in  the  host,  and  which  had  successfully  passed  through  the  early,  dangerous 
stages  following  transplantation.  As  a  result  of  this  immunity  the  tumor  it- 
self, which  has  given  rise  to  the  production  of  the  immunity,  experiences  the 
effect  of  its  own  activity  and  undergoes  complete  retrogression.  A  subsequent 
second  inoculation  of  a  tumor  piece  is  then  unsuccessful.  After  the  tumor 
has  once  been  absorbed,  the  animal  organism  is  no  longer  able  to  neutralize 
the  immune  substances  which  may  still  continue  to  be  produced.  We  believe, 
therefore,  that  also  this  type  of  immunity,  against  the  growth  of  a  transplanted 
tumor,  is  not  merely  caused  by  the  retrogression  of  a  tumor,  but  that  it  already 
sets  in  some  time  preceding  the  retrogression  and  continues  during  this 
process,  and  that  it  is  intensified  through  the  absorption  of  material  from  the 
retrogressing  tumor.  There  follows  then  a  struggle  between  the  host,  which 
produces  substances  injurious  to  the  tumor,  and  the  inherent  growth  energy 
of  the  tumor  combined  with  its  power  to  neutralize  injurious  substances;  in 
addition,  there  may  perhaps  come  into  play  also  certain  adaptive  processes  in 
the  cancer  cells. 

The  increase  in  immunity  which  takes  place  during  the  retrogression  of 
the  tumor  must  in  some  way  depend  on  the  activity  of  the  living,  metabolically 
still  potent  tumor  cells.  This  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  when  we  produced 
retrogression  of  a  first  mouse  carcinoma  IX  by  exposing  the  tumor,  previous 
to  transplantation,  to  a  degree  of  heat  sufficient  to  injure  the  tumor  cells 
markedly  and  thus  experimentally  to  induce  the  subsequent  retrogression 
of  the  grafted  tumor,  the  immunity  resulting  from  this  retrogression  was 


410  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

less  pronounced  than  that  following  a  spontaneous  retrogression  of  a  larger 
tumor  which  at  first  grew  well.  Lumsden  similarly  observed  that  the  im- 
munity is  greater  after  retrogression  of  large  than  of  small  tumors.  It  may 
be  assumed  that  in  order  to  accomplish  the  retrogression  of  an  actively  grow- 
ing large  tumor,  a  higher  degree  of  immunity  will  be  required  than  for  the 
retrogression  of  a  weak  tumor,  and  more  immune  substances  will  therefore 
subsequently  be  available  for  combating  the  growth  of  a  second  tumor.  As 
stated,  this  high  degree  of  immunity  necessary  for  the  absorption  of  large 
tumors  is  achieved  only  if  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  trans- 
plant are  sufficiently  different  to  cause  a  primary  incompatibility,  which 
must,  however,  not  be  so  great  that  it  prevents  growth  of  a  tumor  during  the 
early  periods  following  transplantation.  Subsequently,  it  must  be  assumed, 
the  quantity  of  immune  substances  increases  at  a  rate  too  rapid  for  the 
neutralizing  power  of  the  tumor.  However,  we  have  seen  that  also  the  im- 
munity induced  by  a  growing  tumor  is  greater  if  the  first  tumor  grows 
vigorously,  than  if  it  has  been  weakened  in  its  growth  intensity. 

That  immune  substances  are  produced  under  these  circumstances  and  may 
be  present  in  the  spleen  of  the  tumor-bearing  animals  is  indicated  by  the 
experiments  of  Mottram  and  Russ,  as  well  as  of  Woglom,  who  show  that 
in  the  spleen  of  animals  in  which  tumors  had  retrogressed,  substances  are 
present  which  injure  the  cells  of  a  similar  tumor.  As  mentioned  previously, 
Woglom's  recent  investigations  suggest  the  possibility  that  the  antibodies 
circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  of  an  immune  animal  can  be  absorbed  by 
tumor  mash.  These  substances,  then,  are  able  to  injure  in  vitro  a  piece  of 
tumor  and  prevent  its  successful  transplantation ;  and  likewise  Lumsden  has 
found  that  substances  circulating  in  the  blood  of  rats,  rendered  immune  against 
rat  sarcoma,  succeeded  in  killing  cancer  cells  as  well  as  spleen  cells  of  the 
same  species  growing  in  vitro.  As  stated  in  a  preceding  chapter,  Lumsden 
attributes  these  effects  to  "antimalignancy"  immune  bodies,  devoted  as 
a  result  of  the  growth  of  a  homoiogenous  sarcoma ;  but  Phelps  and  others 
interpret  them  as  due  to  cytotoxins,  which  form  in  response  to  the  presence 
of  strange  species  or  individuality  differentials,  since  these  reactions  occur 
also  with  normal  spleen  cells  and  may  be  elicited  by  antigens  present  in  normal 
spleen. 

In  addition  to  cytotoxins,  there  may  be  found  in  the  bearers  of  retrogressed 
tumors  hemagglutinins,  which  may,  however,  affect  not  only  erythrocytes, 
but  also  other  kinds  of  cells  (Gorer,  Lumsden).  Lumsden  has  made  it  probable 
that  these  cytotoxins  and  hemagglutinins  are  distinct  and  develop  independ- 
ently of  each  other;  he  also  observed  a  definite  relation  between  the  strength 
of  such  antibodies  and  the  retrogressive  changes  which  take  place  in  the 
tumor;  this  would  indicate  that  retrogression  is  due  to  the  action  of  immune 
substances.  However,  while  it  is  quite  probable  that  the  latter  aid  in  the 
injury  of  the  tumor,  it  is  probable  also  that  primary  mechanisms  are  involved, 
and  that  the  immune  substances  originate  as  a  reaction  against  primary 
incompatibilities  between  organismal  differentials. 

Lumsden  noted  that  the  erythrocytes  of  a  rat  may  possess  an  agglutinogen, 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  411 

which  is  present  also  in  rat  sarcoma  cells,  as  demonstrated  by  the  agglutina- 
tion of  these  rat  red  corpuscles  when  mixed  with  the  serum  of  a  rat  made 
immune  against  a  rat  sarcoma.  If  pieces  of  rat  sarcoma  are  transplanted 
into  such  a  rat,  immune  substances  would  not  be  produced,  because  of  the 
presence  of  a  common  antigen  in  the  sarcoma  cells  and  in  the  host  cells,  and 
hence  an  inoculated  piece  of  rat  sarcoma  would  grow.  In  this  case  an  agglu- 
tinogen present  would,  therefore,  make  possible  the  growth  of  a  transplanted 
tumor  and  would  actually  function  as  a  susceptibility  factor  for  this  tumor. 
We  have  discussed  these  observations  already  in  a  preceding  chapter. 

The  histological  changes  which  are  observed  around  retrogressing  tumors 
do  not  explain  the  character  of  the  immunity  noted  in  these  animals.  Thus 
Gaylord  and  Clowes,  and  others,  found  necrosis  and  hemorrhages,  as  well 
as  collections  of  lymphocytes  in  or  around  such  retrogressing  tumors ;  the 
presence  of  lymphocytes  may  be  taken  to  indicate  an  active  reaction  on  the 
part  of  the  host  against  the  transplant.  However,  Ishii  and  the  writer,  in 
examining  tumors  that  retrogressed  following  an  in  vitro  exposure  to  heat, 
did  not  observe  such  collections  of  lymphocytes ;  there  was  merely  a  connec- 
tive tissue  capsule  around  the  tumor  and  a  replacement  of  parts  of  the  tumor 
by  fibrous  tissue. 

It  is  an  interesting  problem  as  to  whether  the  immunity  thus  produced  is 
specific  for  the  tumor  which  has  retrogressed,  or  whether  it  applies  also  to 
other  types  of  tumors.  Bashford  assumed  it  to  be  specific,  because  he  noticed 
that  mice  in  which  an  immunity  had  developed  after  retrogression  of  a  car- 
cinoma were  immune  against  a  re-inoculated  carcinoma,  but  not  against  a 
sarcoma.  However,  as  Caspari  and  others  have  pointed  out,  this  result  is 
probably  to  be  explained  by  the  difference  between  the  growth  energy  of  the 
mouse  sarcoma  and  that  of  the  carcinoma ;  an  immunity  sufficient  to  prevent 
the  growth  of  a  carcinoma,  may  not  have  been  sufficient  to  prevent  that  of  a 
much  more  active  sarcoma.  In  general,  the  specific  immunity  which  has  been 
acquired  is  directed  against  strange  individuality  differentials  in  case  of 
retrogression  of  a  homoiogenous  tumor,  and  against  a  particular  species 
differential  after  retrogression  of  a  heterogenous  tumor.  The  "retrogression" 
immunity  is  therefore  essentially  an  immunity  directed  against  organismal 
differentials  which  are  common  to  various  kinds  of  tissues  and  tumors  belong- 
ing to  the  same  species ;  it  represents  what  Ehrlich  called  "pan-immunity," 
by  which  he  meant  an  immunity  directed  not  only  against  a  tumor  composed 
of  a  certain  kind  of  tissue,  but  also  against  a  tumor  composed  of  another  kind 
of  tissue  of  the  same  species.  Nevertheless,  the  immunity  may  be  greater 
to  tumors  composed  of  the  same  kind  of  tissues  than  to  another  kind  of  tumor 
belonging  to  the  same  species ;  such  a  partial  specificity  was  observed  by 
Greene  after  a  primary  transplantation  of  homoiogenous  tumors  of  the  rabbit 
into  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye,  and  a  second  transplantation  of  the  same 
or  of  another  kind  of  tumor  into  the  other  eye  or  into  the  testicle.  Under 
these  conditions  a  growing  first  tumor  seems  to  act  similarly  to  a  retrogressed 
tumor.  In  addition  to  the  "pan-immunity"  directed  against  all  the  individuality 
differentials  of  a  species,  there  may  exist,  therefore,  an  immunity  directed 


412  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

against  the  individuality  differential  of  a  particular  tumor.  This  is  indicated 
also  by  the  observations  of  Rous  and  Murphy  that  the  immunity  noted  after 
retrogression  of  three  types  of  chicken  sarcoma,  namely,  a  spindle-cell  sar- 
coma, an  osteochondroma,  and  a  rifted  sarcoma,  was  directed  mainly  against 
the  special  kind  of  tumor  that  had  retrogressed.  It  appears  moreover  that 
different  types  of  tumors  differ  quantitatively  in  the  degree  of  immunity  they 
produce,  and  the  effectiveness  of  the  immunization  seems  also  to  depend 
on  the  place  where  the  first  and  second  tumors  were  inoculated.  Thus,  in 
the  rabbit  each  tumor  of  the  uterus  and  mammary  gland  seemed  to  differ 
in  certain  respects  from  the  Brown-Pearce  rabbit  tumor,  in  experiments 
reported  by  Appel,  Saphir  and  their  collaborators,  and  by  Cheever  and 
Morgan,  and  by  Greene.  Furthermore,  there  is  even  the  possibility  that 
immunity  against  a  tumor  of  a  different  species  is  not  absolutely  specific,  but 
that  it  may  extend  also,  although  to  a  lesser  extent,  to  individuals  belonging 
to  a  nearly  related  species. 

(4)  Immunity  produced  through  inoculation  of  pieces  of  normal  tissue  or 
of  tumor  tissue  unable  to  induce  tumor  formation. 

Ehrlich  obtained  immunization  against  a  mouse  carcinoma  by  first  inocu- 
lating mice  with  pieces  of  a  hemorrhagic  mouse  carcinoma,  which  itself 
did  not  give  rise  to  tumor  formation  because  the  tumor  cells  were  injured. 
This  experiment  suggested  the  use  of  normal  tissues  for  purposes  of  immuni- 
zation. Bashford,  by  injection  of  homoiogenous  defibrinated  blood,  obtained 
active  immunity  against  subsequent  inoculations  with  homoiogenous  tumor, 
and  Schoene  found  that  other  living  tissues,  in  particular,  embryonal  tissues, 
were  similarly  effective.  These  observations  were  subsequently  confirmed 
and  extended  by  many  investigators.  The  results  obtained  may  be  summarized 
as  follows:  (a)  Only  living  tissue  is  effective  in  inducing  immunity;  dead 
cells  do  not  immunize,  (b)  It  is  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  inoculated 
pieces  which  give  rise  to  this  type  of  immunity.  There  must  be  a  definite 
relation  between  the  organismal  differential  of  the  piece  of  tissue  serving 
as  antigen  (vaccine)  and  that  of  the  host;  furthermore,  the  organismal 
differential  of  the  antigen  must  bear  a  definite  relation  to  the  differentials 
of  the  tumors  against  which  the  immunization  is  directed.  Autogenous 
tissues  do  not,  therefore,  act  as  an  efficient  antigen  (Apolant,  Woglom). 
Tissues  which  possess  homoiogenous  differentials  in  reference  to  the  host 
animals,  immunize  against  homoiogenous  tumors,  and  heterogenous  tissues 
immunize  against  tumors  possessing  the  same  heterogenous  differential. 
However,  it  is  possible  that  an  immunization  may  in  certain  instances  be 
produced  also  by  the  use  of  tissues  from  nearly  related  species,  mouse 
tissue  immunizing  against  a  rat  tumor  and  vice  versa;  but  this  immunity, 
if  successful  at  all,  is  much  weaker  than  that  produced  by  tissues  with 
identical  organismal  differentials,  (c)  Different  types  of  tissues  differ  as 
to  their  effectiveness  as  antigens ;  embryo  skin  is  very  effective,  whereas 
cartilage,  bone,  muscle  tissue,  lens  and  brain  are  not.  Other  tissues  range 
between  these  extremes.  That  cartilage,  bone  and  muscle  are  relatively 
unfavorable  may  be  due  to  the  predominance,  in  these  tissues,  of  inter- 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  413 

cellular  substances,  and  we  have  every  reason  to  believe  that  it  is  the 
cytoplasmic  elements  which  produce  most  actively  the  individuality  differ- 
entials rather  than  the  paraplastic  parts,  although  there  is  some  evidence 
that  also  the  latter  are  not  devoid  of  individuality  differentials.  Correspond- 
ingly, we  have  found  that  normal  cartilage  elicits  a  weaker  antagonistic 
reaction  of  the  host  than  does  thyroid,  which  is  rich  in  cells.  As  to  the 
inefficiency  of  lens  and  brain,  this  might  be  expected,  because  they  do  not 
furnish  very  effective  homoiogenous  antigens  in  immunization  experiments, 
although  as  we  have  seen  in  an  earlier  chapter,  they  do  contain  homoio- 
differentials.  (d)  There  is,  then,  ample  reason  for  the  conclusion  that  it  is 
the  organismal  differentials,  and  in  particular,  the  individuality  differentials, 
of  the  normal  tissues  acting  as  antigens,  which  call  forth  immunity  against 
the  organismal  differentials  of  the  tumor. 

However,  it  is  not  necessarily  the  specific  individuality  differential  of  a 
certain  individual  which  serves  as  antigen  against  the  identical  individuality 
differential  in  the  tumor;  but  any  individuality  differential  of  the  normal 
tissue,  which  differs  from  the  differential  of  the  host  animal  and  is  therefore 
strange  to  the  latter,  may  function  as  antigen  for  the  tumor.  It  may  then 
be  assumed  that  any  strange  individuality  differential  activates,  in  the  host, 
reactions  which  are  directed  against  all  other  strange  individuality  differen- 
tials, provided  both  host  and  donor  belong  to  the  same  species. 

We  have  seen  that  autogenous  tissues  cannot  serve  as  antigens  against  a 
subsequently  transplanted  homoiogenous  tumor;  likewise,  it  may  be  safely 
assumed  that  tissues  fom  an  animal  belonging  to  a  closely  inbred  strain  cannot 
function  as  an  effective  antigen  in  another  animal  of  the  same  inbred  strain. 
The  experiments  of  Eisen  and  Woglom  on  transplantation  of  a  mammary 
gland  carcinoma  in  inbred  strains  of  rats,  to  which  we  have  already  referred 
in  a  preceding  chapter,  as  well  as  certain  experiments  in  which  the  production 
of  immunity  was  attempted  against  transplanted  leukemic  cells,  are  in  agree- 
ment with  this  conclusion.  Rhoads  and  Miller  observed  that  implantation  of 
normal  mouse  tissues  may  immunize  mice  against  inoculation  of  mouse 
leukemia;  but  while,  according  to  MacDowell,  embryo-skin  of  the  inbred 
strain  Sto  Li  can  produce  resistance  in  strain  C58  to  leukemic  cells  of  line  I, 
embryo-skin  of  strain  C58  is  not  able  to  serve  as  an  efficient  antigen.  However, 
embryo-skin  from  hybrid  (C58  x  Sto  Li)Fx  may  call  forth  immunity  in 
strain  C58.  Evidently  a  single  gene  set  of  Sto  Li  present  in  the  hybrid  enables 
the  tissue  of  the  latter  to  function  as  antigen  and  the  presence  of  the  gene 
set  of  C58  in  the  hybrid  does  not  interfere  with  the  antigenic  action  of  the 
strange  Sto  Li  gene  set.  In  a  similar  manner,  it  seems  that  the  agglutinogens 
of  the  F1  hybrid  between  two  closely  inbred  strains,  which  has  inherited  a 
gene  set  from  each  of  the  parents,  possess  the  ability  to  produce  antibodies 
(agglutinins)  in  certain  hosts  and  to  absorb  these  agglutinins;  in  this  case, 
also,  one  strange  gene  set  is  sufficient  for  this  purpose  and  the  double  gene 
set  is  not  required,  (e)  While  a  strange  individuality  differential  of  normal 
tissue  may  call  forth  immunity  against  a  transplanted  tumor,  the  immunity 
thus  produced  is  not  so  strong  as  that  following  retrogression  of  a  tumor.  It 


414  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

is  even  less  than  the  usual  concomitant  immunity  and  the  degree  of  resistance 
following  extirpation  of  mouse  carcinoma  IX.  (f)  Considering  the  relative 
weakness  of  the  immunity  obtained  by  inoculation  of  normal  tissue,  it  might 
be  foreseen  that  this  type  of  immunization  is  ineffective  against  a  tumor 
possessing  a  great  growth  energy,  or  one  as  resistant  to  injurious  conditions 
as  the  chondroma  of  Ehrlich.  Rous  and  Murphy  were  not  able,  therefore, 
to  produce  immunity  by  inoculation  of  normal  tissues  against  the  Rous 
chicken  sarcoma,  although  during  retrogression  of  these  tumors  there  devel- 
oped spontaneously  an  immunity  which  seemed  to  be  directly  against  the 
agent. 

(5)  The  demonstration  of  immune  substances  in  the  body  fluids  or  tissue 
extracts  of  animals  which  have  been  inoculated  with  cancerous  material  or 
in  which  cancer  has  grown. 

In  the  blood  of  an  animal  which  has  become  immune  against  certain 
bacteria,  either  by  recovering  from  the  disease  caused  by  them  or  by  vaccina- 
tion with  the  microorganisms  or  certain  parts  of  them,  the  presence  or  anti- 
bodies directed  against  these  bacteria  can  in  many  cases  be  demonstrated. 
Similarly,  antibodies  have  been  produced  against  proteins  and  against  cells 
belonging  to  a  different  species,  and  in  some  instances  even  against  certain 
cells  belonging  to  the  same  species  but  to  different  individuals,  or  against 
certain  kinds  of  tissues  and  organs  characteristic  of  a  species.  It  is  natural 
that  following  the  proof  that  an  active  immunity  can  be  produced  against 
transplanted  tumors,  the  question  should  have  been  raised  as  to  whether  there 
are  indications  in  this  case,  also,  of  the  presence  of  antibodies  circulating 
in  the  blood  or  retained  in  the  tissues.  The  existence  of  such  antibodies  against 
heterogenous  tumors  can  be  shown,  but  it  has  been  impossible,  at  least  until 
more  recently,  to  demonstrate  antibodies  which  developed  against  homoioge- 
nous  tumors. 

In  the  large  majority  of  cases,  attempts  to  reveal  the  presence  of  antibodies 
in  the  blood  of  immune  animals  directly,  by  injecting  such  blood  into  sus- 
ceptible animals  of  the  same  species  and  thereby  inhibiting  the  growth  of  a 
tumor  graft,  did  not  succeed,  although  a  few  investigators  (Clowes,  Beebe 
and  Gay  lord,  and  C.  Lewin)  have  reported  positive  results.  In  subsequent 
experiments,  Lumsden  believed  he  had  obtained  some  positive  results  by 
injecting  serum  of  heterogenous  animals,  immunized  against  a  tumor,  into 
the  tumor  itself  growing  in  homoiogenous  animals,  but  under  conditions 
which  were  not  favorable  to  a  rapid  proliferation  of  the  cancerous  tissue. 

By  the  use  of  in  vitro  cultures  of  tumor  cells,  Lambert  and  Hanes  found 
antibodies  against  cancer  cells  in  the  serum  of  heterogenous,  but  not  of 
homoiogenous,  animals  immunized  against  this  tumor.  Likewise,  Yamagiwa 
believed  he  had  demonstrated  antibodies  against  mouse  tumors  in  the  extract 
of  spleen  of  rabbits  immunized  against  such  tumors.  Also,  in  experiments  of 
Tyzzer  there  was  some  indication  of  an  immune  substance  in  the  serum  of 
hybrid  F2,  F3,  and  F4  mice,  between  Japanese  susceptible  and  white  mice 
non-susceptible  to  a  tumor  which  had  originated  in  a  Japanese  mouse.  The 
hybrids  were  non-susceptible  to  this  tumor.  If  a  piece  of  this  tumor  was 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  415 

inoculated  into  a  susceptible  Japanese  mouse  and  serum  from  the  hybrid 
injected  into  the  same  mouse,  but  not  directly  into  the  tumor  tissue,  necrosis 
increased  in  the  graft,  the  mitoses  were  diminished,  and  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  infiltrated  the  transplant.  These  changes  indicated  an  injurious 
effect  of  the  serum,  which  was,  however,  only  transitory;  subsequently  the 
transplanted  piece  began  to  grow. 

However,  in  animals  belonging  to  the  same  species  as  the  tumor  transplant 
it  has  not  been  possible  to  demonstrate  the  existence  of  such  antibodies  until 
recently.  Older  experiments  of  Lambert  and  Hanes  had  been  negative;  also 
the  work  of  Peyton  Rous  with  parabiotic  rats — a  susceptible  rat  joined 
to  a  rat  naturally  immune  to  a  rat  tumor — failed  to  reveal  immune 
bodies  in  the  susceptible  animals,  while  other  investigators  were  unable  to 
find  that  homoiogenous  blood  serum  of  actively  immune  animals  affected  the 
growth  of  tumors,  even  if  the  serum  was  injected  previous  to  or  soon  after 
the  implantation  of  the  tumor  pieces.  Contrary  to  these  results  are  those  of 
Lumsden,  who  noted  indications  of  the  presence  of  antibodies  against  rat 
sarcoma  in  rats  actively  immunized  against  this  sarcoma,  or  in  which  the 
tumor  had  retrogressed.  We  have  referred  already  to  these  experiments  in 
which  the  serum  was  added  to  tissue  cultures  of  rat  sarcoma  and  rat  spleen, 
and  we  have  likewise  discussed  the  experiments  of  Woglom,  which  strongly 
suggested  that  in  serum  of  a  rat,  in  which  a  tumor  had  retrogressed,  sub- 
stances are  found  which  injure  the  tumor  cells  and  may  prevent  their  growth 
after  inoculation  into  a  homoiogenous  animal. 

Furthermore,  substances  injurious  to  Rous  chicken  sarcoma  were  obtained, 
not  only  in  geese,  ducks,  rabbits  and  goats  actively  immunized  against  this 
tumor,  but  also  in  fowls  bearing  a  slowly  growing  fibrosarcoma,  immune  sub- 
stances developed  very  gradually  which  neutralized  in  vitro  not  only  the  agent 
of  the  fibrosarcoma  but  also  the  agent  of  the  more  rapidly  proliferating  Rous 
chicken  sarcoma.  However,  these  latter  manifestations  of  tumor  immunity  are 
different  from  those  observed  in  the  case  of  mammalian  tumors,  because  this 
immunity  in  avian  tumors  was  primarily  directed  not  against  the  tumor  cells 
as  such,  but  against  the  agent  which  causes  the  sarcoma  to  grow. 

If  we  compare  the  reactions  of  a  host  against  normal  tissues  and  against 
tumors,  both  possessing  organismal  differentials  differing  from  those  of  the 
host,  the  bodyfluids  are  found  to  contain  substances  which  are  injurious  to 
both  kinds  of  grafts.  There  are  strong  indications  that  preformed  substances 
as  well  as  newly  formed,  immune  substances,  directed  against  the  individuality 
or  species  differentials  of  these  transplants,  are  active,  and  that  the  substances 
directed  against  the  strange  species  differentials  are  stronger  than  those 
directed  against  strange  individuality  differentials.  But  whereas  in  the  case  of 
normal  tissues  the  immune  substances  are  apparently  of  minor  importance,  in 
the  case  of  tumors  they  appear  to  play  the  major  role  in  determining  the  fate  of 
the  transplants ;  still,  even  in  the  latter  it  is  primarily  the  divergence  between 
the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  which  makes  it  possible  for 
the  differentials  of  the  tumor  grafts  to  function  as  antigens. 

In  principle,  there  do  not  seem  to  be  significant  differences  in  the  antigenic 


416  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

function  of  transplanted  tumor  cells  and  normal  cells  and  of  injected  eryth- 
rocytes, which  latter  elicit  the  formation  of  hemagglutinins  and  hemolysins. 
The  differences  which  do  exist  seem  to  be  mainly  of  a  quantitative  nature,  the 
immune  substances,  which  are  formed  after  transplantation  of  living  normal 
tissues,  being  weaker.  There  is,  perhaps,  the  additional  difference  that  the 
growing  tumor  seems  to  be  able  to  absorb  and  to  neutralize  very  effectively 
the  immune  substances  circulating  in  the  host,  while  normal  tissues  and  eryth- 
rocytes do  not  do  so.  The  proportion  of  neutralized  and  non-neutralized 
immune  substances  and  the  power  of  resistance  of  the  tumor  tissue  to  the  ab- 
sorbed immune  substances  seem  to  vary  in  the  case  of  different  tumors,  and  it 
is  largely  these  variations  which  are  probably  responsible  for  the  differences 
in  the  types  of  immunity  which  develop  after  transplantation  of  tumors  into 
hosts  whose  organismal  differentials  differ  from  those  of  the  tumor.  However, 
as  we  have  stated  already,  there  are  indications  that  not  only  the  organismal 
differentials,  but  also  other  constituents  of  the  tumor  cells,  may  give  rise  to 
states  of  immunity  and  to  the  production  of  immune  substances ;  some  of  these 
data  we  shall  discuss  in  the  last  part  of  this  chapter. 

The  presence  of  immune  substances  in  the  circulating  bodyfluids  of  an  ani- 
mal actively  immunized  against  a  transplanted  tumor  is  perhaps  suggested  also 
by  the  demonstration  of  the  presence  of  substances  in  the  circulating  body- 
fluids  which  enable  a  tumor  graft  to  grow  in  an  animal  belonging  to  a  strain 
unfavorable  to  the  growth  of  a  particular  type  of  tumor.  This  has  been  dem- 
onstrated by  means  of  parabiosis,  if  an  individual  belonging  to  a  strain  favor- 
able to  the  growth  of  the  transplanted  tumor  was  joined  to  an  individual 
normally  resistant  to  the  growth  of  the  inoculated  tumor.  Substances  supplied 
by  the  first  partner  enabled  the  tumor  to  grow  in  the  second  otherwise  unsuit- 
able partner.  We  have  referred  already  to  experiments  of  this  kind  by 
Zakrzewski  and  of  Cloudman  in  a  preceding  chapter,  when  we  discussed 
factors  in  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors.  However  in  this  case  we  have  to 
deal  with  substances  favoring  tumor  growth  while  here  we  are  concerned  with 
substances  inhibiting  tumor  growth. 

(6)  Cellular  reactions  of  the  host  against  the  tumor  transplants.  We  have 
discussed  evidence  which  tends  to  prove  that  under  various  conditions  immune 
substances  directed  against  the  individuality  or  species  differential  of  the 
transplanted  tumor  may  develop  in  the  host.  But,  in  addition,  certain  types  of 
host  cells  react  against  the  transplant,  and  these  reactions  manifest  themselves 
locally  around  the  graft  as  well  as  in  the  circulation  of  the  host.  The  local 
reactions  consist,  above  all,  in  the  accumulation  of  lymphocytes,  but  also 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  connective  tissue  and  blood  vessels  may  take 
part  in  these  processes. 

Simultaneously  with  the  early  studies  of  the  role  of  lymphocytes  in  trans- 
plantation of  normal  tissues  there  began  the  study  of  the  role  of  various  types 
of  leucocytes,  including  lymphocytes,  in  the  reactions  of  the  host  against  a 
tumor.  But  the  cellular  changes  against  transplanted  tumors  were  interpreted 
as  the  local  manifestations  of  a  general  immunity  against  the  tumor  growth. 
This  immunity  was  considered  as  distinct  from  other  types  of  immunity, 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  417 

although  it  was  conceded  by  some  authors  that  also  immune  reactions,  which 
were  analogous  to  those  developing  against  embryonal  tissues,  may  participate 
in  this  process.  Other  investigators  believed  that  the  acquired  resistance  or 
immunity  against  tumor  transplants  led  to  a  deficiency  in  the  ingrowth  of 
stroma  from  the  host  into  the  tumor.  Under  normal  conditions  the  surrounding 
host  tissue  supplies  the  tumor  with  blood  vessels  and  a  connective  tissue 
stroma ;  but  it  was  assumed  that  if  the  host  has  been  made  resistant  or  immune 
against  the  transplant,  it  fails  to  provide  this  stroma. 

As  to  the  lymphocytes,  in  the  case  of  normal  tissue  transplants  we  found  a 
double  significance  of  these  cells:  (1)  Under  certain  conditions  the  strength 
of  the  lymphocytic  accumulation  could  be  used  as  a  quantitative  measure  of 
the  intensity  of  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  a  strange  individuality  differ- 
ential ;  it  served  therefore  as  a  standard  with  which  to  measure  the  difference 
between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  donor,  and,  accordingly, 
also  of  their  degree  of  relationship  or  strangeness.  (2)  The  lymphocytes,  in 
collecting  around  the  transplant  and  invading  it,  were  able  to  injure  it  if  they 
penetrated  into  it  in  dense  masses.  On  the  other  hand,  we  did  not  find  any 
evidence  for  the  further  conclusion  that  the  lymphocytes  give  off  substances 
which  diffuse  into  the  transplant  and  thereby  damage  it,  an  assumption  that 
was  made  by  some  investigators  in  the'  case  of  tumor  transplants. 

The  role  which  lymphocytes  play  in  the  growth  and  retrogression  of  trans- 
planted tumors  seems  to  be  similar  to  that  seen  in  the  case  of  transplanted 
normal  tissues.  There  is,  however,  one  significant  difference.  While  the  marked 
accumulation  of  lymphocytes  around  normal  tissues  and  their  invasion  of  these 
tissues  may  lead  to  the  injury  and  destruction  of  a  considerable  part  of  the 
graft,  in  the  case  of  a  growing  tumor  the  multiplication  and  expansive  growth 
of  the  tumor  cells  may  be  so  active  that  the  lymphocytes  cannot  overcome  the 
graft.  Also,  around  retrogressing  tumors  the  local  accumulation  of  lympho- 
cytes does  not  need  to  be  very  conspicuous.  This  condition  accounts  perhaps 
for  the  fact  that  in  the  transplantation  of  tumors  several  investigators  did  not 
attribute  to  the  lymphocytes  the  role  which  we  did  in  the  grafting  of  normal 
tissues,  but  they  considered  them,  rather,  as  important  agents  in  the  production 
of  the  general  immunity  which  develops  under  various  circumstances  against 
tumor  transplants.  This  latter  interpretation  seemed  also  to  be  supported  by 
the  observation  that  while  an  accumulation  of  lymphocytes  may  become 
noticeable  already  after  a  first  inoculation  of  a  piece  of  tumor,  it  is  more 
accentuated  and  it  appears  more  rapidly  after  a  second  inoculation,  because 
here  the  inoculation  takes  place  in  an  animal  in  which  immunization  processes 
have  set  in  already  as  the  result  of  the  first  inoculation. 

As  stated,  the  activity  of  lymphocytes  around  a  piece  of  tumor  does  not 
need  to  be  pronounced;  this  is  true  especially  if  the  first  transplanted  piece 
begins  to  grow  actively  soon  after  transplantation.  An  accumulation  of  lym- 
phocytes was  more  marked  in  the  early  experiments  of  Burgess  and  Tyzzer; 
however,  these  investigators  did  not  study  the  local  reaction  around  homoiog- 
enous  tumors,  but  around  pieces  of  tumor  which  approached  a  heterogenous 
character;   and  here  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  were  as  prominent  as 


418  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

lymphocytes,  an  observation  which  agrees  with  our  findings  that  polymorpho- 
nuclear leucocytes  tend  to  collect  around  heterogenous  transplants  of  normal 
tissues.  Burgess  and  Tyzzer  noted  that  if  the  tumor  was  not  destroyed  too 
rapidly  through  the  accumulation  of  these  wandering  cells,  dense  scar-like 
fibrous  tissue  was  produced  in  the  transplant.  Likewise,  in  a  later  analysis  of 
these  phenomena,  Tyzzer  (1916)  did  not  interpret  these  primary  cellular 
reactions  as  due  to  and  directed  against  incompatible  organismal  differentials, 
which  secondarily  call  forth  an  immunization,  but  he  adopted  Russell's  view 
that  natural  resistance  against  tumors  is  merely  the  ability  of  the  host  to 
acquire  an  active  immunity  against  the  tumor,  while  susceptibility  means  the 
lack  of  this  ability.  Tyzzer  assumed,  therefore,  that  in  every  case  the  local 
cellular  reaction  was  due  to  an  active  immunity  produced  against  the  trans- 
plant, and  it  was  considered  as  a  phenomenon  specific  for  tumors. 

As  to  the  mechanism  underlying  this  reaction,  Tyzzer  assumed  that  in  com- 
bination with  an  immune  body  the  tumor  products  become  strongly  chemo- 
tatic  for  leucocytes  and  at  the  same  time  stimulate  the  surrounding  fibro- 
blastic tissue.  In  animals  already  immunized,  the  reaction  not  only  sets  in  more 
promptly,  but  here  also  the  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  are  more  numerous, 
while  in  as  yet  untreated  animals,  in  which  the  immunity  develops  only  gradu- 
ally following  the  first  inoculation,  the  reaction  takes  place  more  slowly  and 
the  lymphocytes  are  found  in  relatively  larger  numbers;  the  preponderance  of 
lymphocytes  signifies  a  milder  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host.  In  addition  to 
the  movements  of  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  an  increase 
in  the  number  of  fibroblasts  occurs  in  the  surrounding  tissue,  and  this  he  com- 
pared with  the  formation  of  granulation  tissue  in  inflammatory  processes. 
Tyzzer  concluded,  then,  that  immunization  leads  to  the  production  of  sensitiz- 
ing antibodies  in  the  host,  and  these  combine  with  a  substance  given  off  by  the 
tumor  to  form  an  injurious  substance  (anaphylatoxin),  which  injures  the  host 
tissue  surrounding  the  tumor.  As  a  result  of  such  injury,  inflammation  sets 
in  and  lymphocytes,  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  or  monocytes  appear.  In 
general,  it  is  the  presence  of  this  antigen-antibody  combination  (anaphyla- 
toxin) which  causes  the  accumulation  of  the  leucocytes  of  the  host  in  and 
around  the  graft. 

Also,  in  the  case  of  other  tumors  cellular  reactions  around  the  "transplants 
were  noted  and  the  resistance  of  the  host  to  transplanted  homoiogenous  tumors 
was  attributed  especially  to  the  lymphocytes.  Thus,  when  chicken  sarcoma  was 
transplanted  into  a  naturally  immune  fowl,  Rous  and  Murphy  observed  on 
the  fifth  day  following  transplantation  the  appearance  of  masses  of  lympho- 
cytes around  the  graft,  which  then  degenerated.  In  other  instances  it  seemed, 
however,  that  the  tumor  was  already  seriously  injured  at  an  earlier  period 
following  transplantation,  owing  to  the  failure  of  the  surrounding  tissue  to 
provide  a  stroma  for  the  graft.  Similarly,  Mottram  and  Russ,  studying  im- 
munity against  Jensen  rat  sarcoma,  found  that  when  a  piece  of  tumor  was 
inoculated  into  non-immunized  rats,  the  lymphocytic  reaction  which  developed 
around  the  transplant  was  very  slight  and  did  not  seriously  interfere  with  the 
growth  of  the  tumor.  But  if,  following  a  first  inoculation  with  experimentally 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  419 

weakened  tumor  pieces,  a  second  non- weakened  piece  was  inoculated,  there 
occurred  on  the  second  and  on  the  third  day  a  marked  accumulation  of  lympho- 
cytes, the  sarcoma  cells  disappeared  rapidly,  fibrous  tissue  formed  subsequent- 
ly, and  also  plasma  cells  were  seen.  With  the  disappearance  of  the  sarcomatous 
tissue  the  lymphocytic  reaction  came  to  a  standstill. 

However,  preceding  these  latter  investigations  Da  Fano,  in  1910,  had 
emphasized  the  significance  of  lymphocytes  and  plasma  cells  in  tumor  im- 
munity, but  his  interpretation  of  the  function  of  the  lymphocytes  differed 
from  that  of  Tyzzer  and  also  from  our  conception.  Da  Fano  noted  an  ac- 
cumulation of  lymphocytes  not  only  around  transplanted  pieces  of  tumor,  but 
these  cells  as  well  as  plasma  cells  were  seen  also  in  various  other  places  as  for 
instance  in  the  connective  tissue  underneath  the  skin  of  the  animal  during  the 
process  of  immunization.  Only  living  tumor  tissue  elicited  this  reaction; 
furthermore,  it  was  lacking  around  a  second  piece  of  tumor  inoculated  in  an 
animal  in  which  immunity  had  already  developed.  Da  Fano  attributed,  there- 
fore, to  the  lymphocytes  and  plasma  cells  the  function  of  initiating  the  general 
state  of  immunity  which  follows  the  inoculation  of  a  piece  of  homoiogenous 
normal  tissue  or  tumor.  Somewhat  later,  Baeslack  observed  in  addition  to  the 
localized  reaction,  a  general  reaction  of  the  lymphocytes  to  tumor  growth ; 
the  active  growth  of  a  homoiogenous  tumor  was  accompanied  by  a  decrease 
in  the  number  of  lymphocytes  and  by  an  increase  in  the  number  of  poly- 
morphonuclear leucocytes,  whereas  the  retrogression  of  a  tumor  was  associ- 
ated with  an  increase  in  the  number  of  lymphocytes  as  an  indication  of  the 
development  of  immunity  against  the  transplanted  tumor.  Quite  recently, 
Lewis  has  confirmed  the  increase  in  the  number  of  polymorphonuclear  leuco- 
cytes in  the  peripheral  circulation  in  mice  in  which  the  transplanted  tumor 
grows. 

The  most  extensive  and  ingeniously  varied  investigations  concerning  the 
relations  between  tumor  immunity  and  activity  of  lymphocytes  were  carried 
out  by  Murphy  and  his  associates.  They  noted  both  a  local  accumulation  of 
lymphocytes  around  the  tumor  graft  as  well  as  a  general  increase  of  lympho- 
cytes in  the  circulation  following  transplantation;  an  injurious  effect  re- 
sulted, however,  from  an  increase  in  the  number  and  activity  of  lymphocytes, 
not  only  in  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous,  but  also  in  autogenous  tumor 
grafts.  After  heterotransplantation  of  a  piece  of  tumor,  the  lymphocytic  re- 
action played  the  principal  role  in  the  destruction  of  the  transplant.  These 
investigators  concluded,  furthermore,  that  immunity  against  a  tumor  can  be 
elicited  not  only  through  inoculation  with  a  piece  of  tissue  or  of  tumor  be- 
longing to  the  same  species,  but  that  any  non-specific  agency  which  increases 
the  number  and  activity  of  lymphocytes,  increases  thereby  the  defensive  reac- 
tions of  the  host  against  the  transplant,  and  conversely,  any  agency  that  de- 
creases the  number  and  activity  of  lymphocytes  increases  thereby  the  sus- 
ceptibility of  the  host  to  the  tumor  transplants.  Small  doses  of  Roentgen  rays 
stimulate  and  strong  doses  injure  the  lymphocytes ;  exposure  of  mice  to 
graded  intensities  of  dry  heat  and  injections  of  certain  oils  or  unsaturated 
fatty  acids  stimulate  the  lymphocytes.  The  effects  of  these  various  agencies  on 


420  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

resistance  and  susceptibility  to  tumor  growth  can  be  gauged  by  their  effects 
on  the  lymphocytes.  In  accordance  with  the  views  expressed  by  Da  Fano, 
Murphy  believes  that  the  lymphocytic  reaction  which  develops  around  a  tumor 
graft  in  an  immunized  animal  is  the  local  manifestation  of  a  general  reaction 
which  takes  place  in  the  animal.  When  mice  are  naturally  immune  against  a 
tumor  graft,  or  when  they  have  been  made  immune  by  experimental  means, 
they  show  an  immediate  and  very  marked  increase  in  the  number  of  circulat- 
ing lymphocytes  following  inoculation  with  a  piece  of  tumor  against  which 
they  are  immune,  whereas,  the  other  blood  cells  show  no  change.  Similarly,  in 
the  lymph  glands  of  a  mouse  which  has  been  immunized  experimentally,  or  in 
which  immune  processes  set  in  following  absorption  of  its  tumor,  the  mitotic 
proliferation  of  the  lymphocytes  is  much  increased,  and  it  is  still  further  in- 
creased after  a  second  inoculation  of  a  tumor  piece.  From  all  these  observa- 
tions Murphy  concluded  that  the  general,  as  well  as  the  localized  lymphocytic 
reaction  is  not  merely  a  condition  accompanying  tumor  immunity,  but  that  it 
is  responsible  for  the  development  of  this  immunity,  and  as  stated  above,  he 
found  that  even  an  otherwise  successful  autogenous  transplantation  of  spon- 
taneous tumors  can  be  prevented  through  an  increase  in  the  activity  of 
lymphocytes. 

There  were  various  other  experiments  which  seemed  to  support  this  inter- 
pretation. Thus  Murphy  found  that  if  pieces  of  heterogenous  (mammalian) 
tumors  or  embryonal  tissues  were  transplanted  on  the  chick  allantoic  mem- 
brane, they  grew  for  some  time.  However,  if  he  transplanted  simultaneously 
with  the  mammalian  tumor  small  pieces  of  chicken  spleen  or  bone  marrow, 
the  tumor  did  not  grow,  presumably  because  of  the  injurious  action  of  the 
lymphocytes  contained  in  the  latter  organs.  Accordingly,  growth  of  the  tumor 
ceased  at  the  time  when,  in  the  eighteen  or  twenty-day-old  chick  embryo,  the 
spleen  begins  normally  to  function.  But,  Danchakoff  maintains  that  it  is  not 
the  lymphocytes  of  the  transplanted  spleen  or  bone  marrow  which  grow  out 
towards  the  tumor  and  injure  it,  but  monocytes  or  reticuloendothelial  cells. 

There  are  other  regions  in  the  body  where  the  resistance  offered  to  the 
growth  of  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous  tumors  is  distinctly  lessened.  Ref- 
rence  has  been  made  to  the  diminution  in  the  intensity  of  the  lymphocytic 
reaction  after  homoiotransplantation  of  normal  tissues  into  the  brain.  Ebeling 
( 1914)  had  found  indications  that  in  mice  which  are  immune  to  subcutaneous 
inoculation  of  mouse  carcinoma,  transplantation  into  the  brain  might  still  be 
successful.  According  to  the  subsequent  observation  of  Shirai,  it  was  possible 
to  transplant  mammalian  tumors  into  the  brain  of  a  strange  species.  Murphy 
likewise  noted  that  heterotransplantation  of  tumors  into  the  brain  may  be 
more  successful  than  transplantation  into  other  parts  of  the  mammalian  or- 
ganisms, and  moreover,  that  the  lymphocytic  reaction  is  lacking  here  pro- 
vided the  transplant  has  not  been  in  contact  with  the  meninges  or  with  the 
choroid  plexus.  Active  immunization  which  was  sufficient  to  prevent  tumor 
growth  subcutaneously,  was  ineffective  against  a  tumor  grafted  into  the  brain ; 
but  again,  a  simultaneous  transplantation  of  a  piece  of  spleen  tissue  into  the 
brain  caused  the  mechanisms  of  defense  against  the  heterogenous  tumor  to 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  421 

become  active.  E.  Harde  also  observed  that  heterotransplantation  of  mouse 
tumors  succeeds  better  in  the  brain  than  in  the  subcutaneous  tissue,  but  this 
applies  only  if  nearly  related  species  are  used  as  hosts ;  transplantation  of 
human  tumors  into  the  brain  of  rodents  did  not  succeed,  nor  did  the  trans- 
plantation of  mouse  tumors  into  the  brain  of  guinea  pigs.  It  seems  that  in  this 
organ  the  organismal  differentials  are  less  well  developed  than  in  most  other 
parts  of  the  body.  In  this  respect  the  brain  behaves  somewhat  like  the  testicle, 
where,  according  to  Gheorgiu,  heterogenous  tumors  can  also  be  transplanted 
successfully,  and  even  more  readily  than  into  the  brain.  A  further  favorable 
site  is  the  anterior  chamber  of  the  eye  (Smirnova,  Greene  and  Saxton, 
Greene)  ;  however,  as  to  the  behavior  of  the  lymphocytes  under  these  condi- 
tions, no  observations  have  been  recorded  so  far. 

The  views  of  different  investigators  concerning  the  role  which  lymphocytes 
play  in  the  immunization  against  transplanted  tumors  are,  to  some  extent,  still 
contradictory.  However,  from  a  review  of  the  results  obtained  and  from  our 
own  experiments,  we  conclude  that  in  the  growth  of  tumors  the  lymphocytes 
play  a  part  similar  to  that  which  we  ascribed  to  them  in  the  case  of  grafts  of 
normal  tissues.  Under  certain  conditions  they  may  serve  as  indicators  of  a  dis- 
cordance between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  If  host 
and  transplant  belong  to  different  species,  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  ap- 
pear around  the  tumor  and  invade  it,  in  addition  to  or  instead  of  the  lympho- 
cytes. But,  while  with  normal  tissues  the  accumulation  of  lymphocytes  and 
their  invasive  activity  may  in  certain  cases  become  so  pronounced  that  it  leads 
to  the  destruction  of  a  great  part  of  the  transplant,  with  tumors  this  effect 
seems  to  be  much  less  marked.  According  to  Woglom,  the  retrogression  of 
tumors  is  not  necessarily  associated  with  an  increased  activity  of  the  lymph 
glands,  and  in  our  early  work  on  the  retrogression  of  tumors  in  homoiogenous 
organisms,  whose  individuality  differentials  differed  markedly  from  those  of 
the  hosts,  we  found  no  reason  to  attribute  the  retrogression  to  the  activity  of 
the  lymphocytes ;  furthermore,  Ishii  and  the  writer,  in  a  study  of  tumors  which 
had  been  weakened  by  heat  previous  to  transplantation  and  which  subsequently 
retrogressed,  did  not  observe  an  accumulation  of  lymphocytes  around  or  in  the 
transplant  sufficient  to  account  for  the  retrogression ;  we  did  find,  however, 
the  formation  of  a  strong  connective  tissue  capsule  around  such  tumors,  which 
may  very  well  have  helped  to  produce  an  inhibiting  effect  on  the  weakened 
tissue.  As  in  transplanted  normal  tissue,  so  also  in  transplanted  tumors  the 
bodyfluids  of  the  host  may,  to  a  large  extent,  determine  the  fate  of  the  graft, 
and  they  may  be  the  principal  factor  concerned  in  this  effect  in  the  case  of 
tumors. 

It  is,  then,  essentially  the  discrepancy  in  the  individuality  differentials  of 
host  and  transplant  which  causes  the  accumulation  of  lymphocytes,  and  which 
may  also  increase  the  activity  of  connective  tissue  around  the  transplant ;  and 
it  is  likewise  on  the  basis  of  a  discrepancy  between  the  organismal  differentials 
that  immunity  develops,  which  then  may  perhaps  intensify  the  lymphocytic 
reaction.  If  this  interpretation  is  correct,  we  should  expect  a  distinct  accumu- 
lation of  lymphocytes  to  be  lacking  around  autotransplants  of  spontaneous 


422  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tumors,  and  this  seems  to  be  the  case ;  it  likewise  has  been  found  impossible  to 
immunize  against  a  tumor  with  autogenous  tissue.  However,  there  is  an  ex- 
periment by  Murphy  which  does  not  seem  in  accordance  with  this  interpreta- 
tion. He  found  it  possible  to  prevent  the  growth  of  autogenous  carcinoma 
transplants  by  the  local  application  of  erythema-producing  X-ray  doses  to  the 
skin ;  but  in  this  case  we  have  probably  to  deal  not  with  an  effect  on  the  lympho- 
cytes but  with  a  condition  of  a  different  nature.  Through  radiation  the  tissue 
has  presumably  been  made  into  an  unfavorable  soil  for  the  development  of 
the  graft.  The  incorporation  of  the  latter  into  the  host  and  its  nourishment 
are  inhibited  under  these  circumstances,  which  are  non-specific  and  would 
therefore  affect  tissues,  irrespective  of  their  relationship  to  the  host. 

However,  lymphocytes  are  attracted  not  only  locally  to  a  tumor  possessing 
a  strange  individuality  differential,  but  they  are  increased  also  in  the  general 
circulation,  due  to  the  fact  that  the  homoiodifferentials  enter  also  the  blood 
vessels  and  various  organs.  This  is  another  instance  of  the  resemblance  of 
tumors  to  normal  tissues  possessing  a  strong  individuality  differential.  But  no 
proof  has  been  given  for  the  view  that  it  is  on  account  of  these  lymphocytic 
changes  in  the  whole  organism  that  immunity  develops.  The  production  of 
antibodies  probably  depends  on  the  stimulation  of  the  reticulo-endothelial 
tissue. 

The  great  similarity  in  the  behavior  of  lymphocytes  after  transplantation  of 
tumors  and  of  normal  tissues,  and  the  significance  of  the  relations  of  the 
organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant  in  determining  the  nature  and 
intensity  of  these  reactions,  has  been  further  confirmed  by  the  recent  investi- 
gations of  Blumenthal,  concerning  the  alterations  which  take  place  in  the 
blood  cells  of  animals  into  which  pieces  of  tumors  have  been  transplanted. 
There  is  a  complete  analogy  between  such  alterations  and  those  which  occur 
after  transplantation  of  normal  tissues ;  differences  which  do  exist  are  due  to 
secondary  conditions.  Homoiotransplantation  of  rat  carcinoma  and  sarcoma 
into  rats  brings  about  an  increase  in  lymphocytes  in  the  blood,  which  begins 
on  the  fourth  or  fifth  day  following  transplantation  and  persists  for  eight  to 
ten  days,  or  sometimes  longer,  the  maximum  being  reached  between  the 
seventh  and  ninth  days.  Quantitatively,  the  reaction  is  of  about  the  same  order 
as  the  one  following  transplantation  of  homoiogenous  normal  tissues,  and  it 
may  occur  whether  the  tumor  grows  or  not.  The  same  results  were  obtained 
in  mice  after  homoiotransplantation  of  tumors,  either  into  the  same  inbred 
strain  or  into  strange  strains.  In  these  two  types  of  transplantation  the 
changes  in  the  blood  were  similar,  although  the  tumors  grew  in  the  same 
strain,  while  they  did  not  grow  in  strange  animals.  Still,  the  increase  in  the 
number  of  lymphocytes  in  the  first  type  was  not  quite  as  rapid  as  that  in  the 
second  type,  although  it  tended  to  persist  for  a  somewhat  longer  period;  in 
transplantations  between  different  strains,  the  curve  representing  the  variations 
in  the  lymphocyte  counts  showed  a  steeper  ascent  as  well  as  a  steeper  descent. 

Homoiotransplantation  of  a  benign  rat  tumor,  an  adenofibroma  of  the 
mammary  gland,  likewise  caused  an  increase  in  lymphocytes,  but  it  was  a  little 
lower  than  that  observed  after  transplantation  of  cancerous  tissues  and  there 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  423 

was  a  somewhat  greater  variation  as  to  the  time  of  maximum  increase.  When 
in  rats  and  mice  with  growing  homoiotransplanted  tumors  the  period  of  obser- 
vation was  extended  until  the  tumors  had  reached  a  considerable  size  and  the 
animals  had  become  debilitated,  the  number  of  erythrocytes  decreased  and  at 
the  same  time  the  number  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  increased  in  the 
peripheral  blood.  A  similar  parallelism  in  the  changes  in  erythrocytes  and 
leucocytes  occurred  in  mice  with  growing  autogenous  (spontaneous)  tumors. 
There  were  no  significant  changes  in  the  number  and  relative  distribution  of 
lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  until  the  tumors  became  moder- 
ately large.  From  that  time  on  there  was  a  gradual  increase  in  the  total  white 
cell  count  and  in  the  relative  number  of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes.  At  the 
same  time  a  decrease  in  the  total  number  of  red  cells  and  an  increase  in 
reticulocytes  occurred ;  also,  normoblasts  appeared  in  the  peripheral  blood 
when  the  later  stages  of  the  anemia  were  reached.  When  the  tumors  became 
large,  the  average  erythrocyte  count  fell  to  4.12  million  cells  per  cmm. 
(Blumenthal).  In  the  bone  marrow  the  newformation  of  the  red  cells  was 
intensified  and  it  appears  probable  that  the  increase  in  the  number  of  poly- 
morphonuclear leucocytes  in  the  peripheral  blood  was  caused  by  the  stimula- 
tion which  occurred  in  the  bone  marrow  as  the  result  of  the  very  marked 
anemia. 

Heterotransplantation  of  rat  and  mouse  tumors  to  guinea  pig,  mouse  and 
rat  led  in  principle  to  the  same  changes  as  those  observed  after  heterotrans- 
plantation of  normal  tissues.  There  was  an  increase  in  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  in  the  peripheral  blood,  which  set  in  between  the  second  and  fourth 
day  after  transplantation  and  which  reached  a  maximum  between  the  sixth  and 
tenth  day.  It  persisted  somewhat  longer  than  the  increase  observed  after 
heterotransplantation  of  normal  tissues,  but  the  degree  of  increase  was  about 
the  same  in  each.  In  each  also  the  return  of  the  number  of  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes  to  normal  was  followed  by  an  increase  in  lymphocytes,  which 
reached  a  maximum  usually  between  the  sixteenth  and  eighteenth  day  after 
transplantation  and  then  dropped  to  the  usual  level.  This  rise  in  the  number 
of  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  following  heterotransplantation  of  tumors 
and  of  normal  tissues  was  not  associated  with  anemia  and  increased  erythro- 
poiesis  in  the  bone  marrow;  it  was  presumably  due  to  a  direct  effect  of  the 
organismal  differentials  on  the  leucocytes  or  their  precursor  cells  in  the  bone 
marrow. 

If,  twelve  or  twenty  days  following  the  homoiotransplantation  of  a  piece  of 
normal  tissue,  a  second  homoiotransplantation  of  a  similar  piece  is  carried  out, 
a  lymphocytic  reaction  follows  also  this  transplantation  as  well,  but  in  this 
case  the  reaction  occurs  somewhat  more  rapidly,  although  the  rise  is  not  quite 
so  great  in  the  majority  of  animals  as  after  the  first  transplantation.  The  same 
effect  is  obtained  if  in  the  first  homoiotransplantation  a  piece  of  cancerous 
tissue  is  used  instead  of  normal  tissue  and  if  normal  homoiogenous  tissue  is 
then  transplanted  twenty  days  after  the  first  transplantation.  In  principle,  the 
same  results  were  obtained  if  two  successive  homoiotransplantations  of 
tumors  were  made;  even  if  the  second  transplantation  was  delayed  so  long 


424  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

that  the  first  homoiotransplant  had  elicited  an  increase  in  polymorphonuclear 
leucocytes,  a  second  homoiotransplantation  of  tumor  was  again  followed  by 
a  rise  in  the  lymphocytes. 

Furthermore,  a  like  sequence  of  events  was  noted  when  in  a  first  homoio- 
transplantation normal  tissue  was  used  and,  sometime  later,  a  piece  of  homoiog- 
enous  tumor.  But  if  instead  of  homoiogenous  tissue,  heterogenous  tissue  was 
transplanted  and  this  was  followed  by  a  second  transplant  of  homoiogenous 
tumor,  the  reaction  which  followed  the  second  transplantation  was  not  modi- 
fied by  the  first  transplant.  It  is  apparently  only  a  first  homoiotransplantation 
which  influences  a  second  homoiotransplantation.  The  character  of  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials  of  both  the  first  and  second  grafts  determines  the  mode 
of  reaction  in  the  blood,  but  the  tissue  or  organ  differential,  or  the  differences 
between  the  differentials  of  normal  and  tumor  tissue  belonging  to  the  same 
species,  is  of  no  importance  as  far  as  this  reaction  is  concerned.  These  very 
interesting  experiments  of  Blumenthal  confirm,  therefore,  the  conclusion  that 
in  transplantation  of  both  normal  tissues  and  tumors  the  organismal  differ- 
entials are  a  very  important  factor  in  determining  the  kind  of  reaction  of  the 
host  against  the  graft,  and  the  behavior  of  the  lymphocytes  and  of  the 
polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  can  be  used  as  an  indicator  of  the  relationship 
between  hosts  and  transplants.  It  may  then  be  concluded  that  as  far  as  the 
reactions  in  the  cellular  constituents  of  the  blood  are  concerned,  transplants  of 
various  kinds  of  tumors,  as  well  as  autogenous  tumors,  behave  like  the  corre- 
sponding transplants  of  normal  tissues,  and  that  the  reactions  in  both  instances 
depend  on  the  relationship  of  the  organismal,  and  in  particular,  of  the  indi- 
viduality differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  the  differentials  of  the  tumor 
being  essentially  the  same  as  those  of  normal  tissues  from  which  they  are 
derived.  There  is  reason  for  connecting  the  increase  in  the  number  of  polymor- 
phonuclear leucocytes  in  the  circulating  blood  which  occurs  during  a  later 
period  in  the  growth  of  transplanted  as  well  as  of  spontaneous  autogenous 
tumors,  with  the  same  factors  which  were  responsible  for  the  anemic  changes 
which  are  noted  in  the  bone  marrow. 

In  the  case  of  normal  tissues  we  have  seen  that  differences  in  the  constitu- 
tion of  the  individuality  differentials  between  host  and  transplant  may  cause 
not  only  the  invasion  of  the  transplant  by  lymphocytes,  but  may  also  induce 
a  more  active  reaction  of  the  connective  tissue  cells  of  the  host  against  the 
graft,  and  may  tend  to  diminish  the  ingrowth  of  capillaries  into  the  transplant. 
The  experiments  of  Burgess  and  Tyzzer  indicate  that  also  around  a  graft, 
whose  organismal  differential  differs  markedly  from  that  of  the  host,  connec- 
tive tissue  growth  may  be  quite  active,  and  the  resulting  increase  in  the  forma- 
tion of  fibrous  tissue  may  still  further  contribute  to  the  injury  of  the  trans- 
plant. But  it  is  exactly  the  opposite  condition,  namely,  a  lack  of  ingrowth  of 
connective  tissue,  accompanied  by  a  lack  of  ingrowth  of  blood  vessels  into 
the  graft,  a  lack  of  "stroma  reaction"  on  the  part  of  the  host  tissue,  which, 
according  to  Russell  and  Bashford,  may  result  in  the  destruction  of  homoiog- 
enous tumor  transplants  in  immunized  animals,  and  they  believe  the  lack  of 
this  reaction  to  be  the  mechanism  through  which  the  active  immunity  of  the 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  425 

host  against  the  transplant  becomes  effective.  They  applied  this  conception 
also  to  animals  which  had  become  immune  following  the  retrogression  of 
their  tumors.  In  some  way  immunization  was  supposed  to  interfere  with  the 
chemotatic  attraction  which  tumor  transplants  exerted  on  the  surrounding 
tissues  of  the  host.  Russell  and  Bashford  held  that  the  mechanism  of  an  active 
immunity,  or  rather,  of  an  active  resistance  against  transplanted  tumors,  com- 
bined with  the  apparent  lack  immune  bodies  in  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host, 
constituted  a  condition  distinct  from  any  other  known  kind  of  immunity.  On 
the  other  hand,  natural  immunity  and  active  immunity  against  heterogenous 
tumors  did  not  depend,  in  their  opinion,  upon  a  lack  of  stroma  reaction,  the 
immunity  against  heterogenous  tumors  in  particular  being  due,  rather,  to  the 
cytolytic  effect  exerted  by  the  injurious  bodyfluids  on  the  peripheral  tumor 
cells,  a  phenomena  related  to  the  formation  and  action  of  agglutinins,  precipi- 
tins and  hemolysins  which  affect  certain  normal  cells  or  proteins.  Similar 
observations  to  those  of  Russell  concerning  the  significance  of  the  stroma  re- 
action, were  subsequently  reported  by  Woglom  in  the  immunity  against  rat 
tumors,  and  by  Rous  in  the  transplantation  of  embryonal  tissues  in  mice  which 
had  been  previously  immunized  against  embryonal  mouse  tissue.  According 
to  Rous  and  Murphy,  in  the  transplantation  of  chicken  sarcoma  into  naturally 
immune  fowl,  especially  into  those  in  which  previously  retrogression  of  such 
a  tumor  had  taken  place,  the  successful  inoculation  with  a  second  tumor  may 
be  prevented  either  through  lack  of  a  stroma  reaction  or  through  the  subse- 
quent accumulation  of  lymphocytes.  However,  later  investigations  did 
not  confirm  the  theory  of  a  lack  of  a  stroma  reaction  as  the  mechanism  under- 
lying the  destruction  of  the  grafts  in  immunized  mice  (Mottram  and  Russ, 
Murphy,  Tyzzer  and  Levin).  We  and  our  associates  likewise  have  failed  to 
observe  a  phenomenon  corresponding  to  it  in  the  case  of  normal  tissues,  al- 
though Cora  Hesselberg  and  the  writer  noticed  a  diminished  vascularization 
of  homoiogenous  as  compared  with  autogenous  grafts. 

Russell  and  Bashford,  believing  that  active  immunity  depends  upon  a  lack 
of  stroma  reaction,  assumed  that  this  immunity  can  manifest  itself  directly 
after  transplantation  only,  before  the  tumor  has  been  incorporated  in  the  host 
tissue  and  has  begun  to  grow,  However,  there  is  every  reason  for  believing 
that  a  retrogression  of  homoiogenous  tumors  may  be  caused  by  an  active  immu- 
nity which  develops  in  the  host  during  the  period  of  growth  of  the  transplant. 
In  this  case  there  is  then  an  active  immunity  which  does  not  depend  upon  a 
lack  of  stroma  reaction.  Moreover,  Russell  himself  noted  that  in  actively 
immunized  animals  a  small  tumor  nodule  may  occasionally  grow  for  some  time, 
but  subsequently  retrogress.  Here,  too,  the  active  immunity  causing  the  retro- 
gression does  not  depend  upon  the  stroma  reaction  for  its  manifestation.  It  is 
known  that  under  certain  conditions  homoiogenous  and  even  heterogenous 
tumors  are  able  to  remain  alive  and  even  to  grow  for  some  time  without 
possessing  a  stroma.  We  may  then  conclude  that  the  lack  of  a  stroma  reaction 
does  not  play  a  significant  role  in  the  active  immunity  against  homoiogenous 
tumors. 

In  a  somewhat  different  way,  also,  Greene  attributes  to  the  stroma  a  promi- 


426  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

nent  role  in  the  mechanism  through  which  immunity  affects  the  tumor.  He 
believes  that  immune  processes  may  act  on  a  tumor  injuriously  by  interfering 
with  the  formation  of  the  specific  stroma  which  the  tumor  needs,  and  that  in 
this  way  the  growth  of  a  carcinoma  may  be  prevented  in  immune  animals. 
However,  it  is  much  more  probable  that  in  his  experiments  the  immune  proc- 
esses acted  primarily  on  the  tumor  cells  directly,  diminishing  their  growth 
energy,  and  that  as  a  result  of  this  interference  the  relations  between  the  tumor 
parenchyma  and  the  ingrowing  connective  tissue  were  changed.  We  have  found 
in  other  instances  definite  correlations  between  the  parenchyma  and  stroma, 
in  which  the  condition  of  the.  former  was  the  primary  and  decisive  factor 
which  determined  the  condition  of  the  latter. 

In  the  case  of  microorganisms  there  is  good  reason  for  assuming  that  the 
reticulo-endothelial  tissue  is  the  seat  of  the  production  of  immune  bodies, 
and  there  are  strong  indications  that  also  the  immunity  against  tumor  trans- 
plants, as  far  as  it  is  caused  by  differences  in  the  organismal  differentials  be- 
tween host  and  transplant,  is  due  to  a  stimulation  of  the  reticulo-endothelial 
system ;  the  activity  of  the  lymphocytes  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes 
are  apparently  factors  of  secondary  importance  in  the  mechanism  underlying 
this  immunity ;  they  function  mainly  as  indicators  of  the  relationship  between 
the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant.  Various  investigators, 
Apolant,  Uhlenhuth,  Vorlander,  Caspari,  have  assumed  that  it  is  the  reticulo- 
endothelial system  which  gives  origin  to  tissue  immunity.  In  the  reticulo- 
endothelial tissues  abnormal  cells  or  strange  colloidal  substances  circulating  in 
the  bodyfluids  are  held  back  and  phagocytosed,  and  here,  especially  in  the 
spleen  and  bone  marrow,  they  set  in  motion  the  mechanisms  leading  to  the 
production  of  immunity.  The  main  evidence  for  the  conclusion  that  this  applies 
also  to  immunity  against  transplanted  tumors  consists  in  the  demonstration 
that  different  types  of  this  immunity,  such  as  concomitant  and  retrogression 
immunity,  and  probably  also  certain  instances  of  natural  immunity,  can  be 
abolished  by  inactivation  (blockade)  of  the  reticulo-endothelial  system,  either 
by  injection  of  substances  such  as  India  ink,  colloidal  metals  or  dyes  (Roskin, 
Lignac  and  van  de  Borne),  or  by  means  of  strong  doses  of  X-rays.  Weak  doses 
of  X-rays,  or  certain  other  procedures,  such  as  stimulation  of  the  spleen 
through  ultraviolet  rays  (Roskin),  may  stimulate  the  reticulo-endothelial  cells 
and  thus  produce  an  opposite  effect,  leading  to  an  increase  in  immunity  against 
tumor  transplants.  There  is  the  possibility  that  in  addition  to  the  formation  of 
the  immune  substances  the  reticulo-endothelial  cells  may  be  concerned  in  the 
production  of  the  primary  preformed  substances  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids 
which  act  on  organismal  differentials,  although  such  a  function  has  not  yet 
been  demonstrated.  Quite  recently  Ehrich  and  Harris  have  found  evidence 
that  also  local  lymph  glands  may  participate  in  the  production  of  antibacterial 
immune  substances  and  of  immune  hemolysins  and  they  noted  that  such  lymph 
glands  show  a  hyperplasia  of  the  lymphocytic  tissue.  This  observation  sug- 
gests the  possibility  that  it  may  be  the  lymphocytes  rather  than  the  reticulo- 
endothelial cells  which  produce  these  substances.  We  would  then  have  to 
assume  that  the  lymphocytes  react  to  strange  differentials  in  a  twofold  way, 
namely  by  movements  and  by  the  production  in  immune  substances. 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  427 

We  have  discussed  those  aspects  of  immunity  against  transplanted  tumors, 
in  which  organismal  differentials  function  as  antigens.  It  may  be  further 
stated  that  the  organismal  differentials  in  tumors,  are  essentially  the  same 
as  those  of  the  normal  tissues  from  which  the  tumors  are  derived.  There  are, 
however,  indications  that  other  substances  present  in  tumors,  besides  the 
organismal  differentials,  may  be  antigenic.  A  brief  outline  of  some  of  the 
principal  data  which  point  to  the  presence  of  these  secondary  antigens  will 
now  be  given. 

(7)  The  presence  of  antigens  other  than  organismal  differentials  in  tumor 
cells.  By  serological  tests  the  same  types  of  antigenic  constituents  have  been 
found  in  certain  cancers,  which  normal  cells  in  corresponding  organs  of  the 
same  species  possess,  namely,  species-specific,  organ-specific,  blood-group 
and  heterophilic  Forssman  antigens ;  also  alcohol  soluble  substances  corre- 
sponding to  Wassermann  antigens  not  characteristic  of  either  organ  or  species 
may  occur.  Thus  the  cells  of  a  carcinoma  developing  in  individuals  belonging 
to  blood  group  A  may  contain  these  same  blood-group  antigens  and  the  partial 
Forssman  antigens  which  are  associated  with  blood  group  A.  Mouse  carcinoma 
may  contain  Forssman  antigen,  in  accordance  with  the  fact  that  the  mouse 
belongs  to  the  group  of  those  species  which  possess  heterophilic  antigens. 
However,  there  are  apparently  some  exceptions  to  this  parallelism  between 
normal  tissues  and  tumors.  According  to  Kritchewski  and  Rubinstein,  also 
the  Flexner-Jobling  rat  tumor  contains  Forssman  antigens,  although  normal 
rat  organs  do  not  contain  them ;  this  would  constitute  a  difference  between 
cancerous  and  the  corresponding  normal  tissues.  Moreover,  while  human 
carcinoma  cells  of  individuals  belonging  to  blood  group  II,  like  some  normal 
cells,  may  possess  the  A  differential,  it  has  been  stated  that  it  is  never  found 
in  sarcoma  cells;  but  it  is  not  certain  that  normal  connective  tissue  cells  of 
such  individuals  contain  it.  Hence  we  find  in  cancer  cells  a  complex  condi- 
tion, which  makes  the  search  for  constituents  characteristic  of  carcinomatous 
cells,  and  not  present  in  normal  cells,  difficult,  and  this  may  explain  at  least 
in  part  the  contradictory  nature  of  some  of  the  results  obtained  by  various 
investigators.  Some  of  these  obstacles  to  the  discovery  of  specific  tumor  anti- 
gens were  overcome  by  using  for  immunization  carcinomatous  material  from 
persons  belonging  to  blood  group  I,  which  is  free  of  antigens  A  and  B,  or  by 
first  extracting  the  blood  group  antibodies  by  means  of  erythrocytes  possessing 
group  A.  Furthermore,  the  attempt  was  made  to  modify  the  material  to  be  used 
for  immunization  by  destroying  or  eliminating  the  species  and  normal  organ 
antigens  before  injecting  the  antigen.  Hirszfeld  and  his  collaborators  found 
that  by  immunizing  rabbits  with  human  carcinoma  of  a  certain  organ,  immune 
sera  developed  in  a  small  minority  of  the  rabbits  which  reacted  with  different 
types  of  human  carcinomas,  irrespective  of  the  organs  in  which  they  origi- 
nated. Witebsky  and  Lehmann-Facius,  by  using  boiled,  instead  of  fresh, 
unheated  carcinoma  suspensions  as  antigens,  obtained  antibodies  which  were 
specific  for  carcinoma,  and  not  merely  for  the  species  or  the  organ  in  which 
the  cancer  occurred.  Witebsky,  in  addition,  used  boiled  globulins  of  cancer 
tissue  in  these  tests.  According  to  Lehmann-Facius,  the  complement  fixation 


428  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  takes  place  when  antigen  and  immune  substances  interact,  can  be 
made  still  more  specific  if  the  test  is  carried  out  at  a  temperature  near  the 
freezing  point.  But,  while  Witebsky  assumes  that  the  immune  serum  obtained 
against  the  carcinoma  of  a  certain  organ  as  a  rule  reacts  specifically  with  the 
antigens  prepared  from  a  carcinoma  of  the  same  organ,  and  only  exceptionally 
with  cancers  from  other  organs,  Lehmann-Facius  maintains  that  the  antisera 
show  a  positive  complement  fixation  reaction  with  all  kinds  of  human  cancers, 
and  even  with  cancers  of  other  species. 

But,  in  addition,  Witebsky  and  Morelli  found  that  if  in  rabbits  immune 
substances  are  produced  against  human  sarcoma,  these  immune  substances 
react  with  alcohol  extracts  not  only  of  human  sarcoma,  but  also  of  carcinoma 
and  even  of  various  normal  human  organs ;  but  these  substances  are  species- 
specific  and  do  not  react  with  rat  or  chicken  sarcoma.  However,  it  is  possible 
to  absorb  from  such  immune  serum  the  quota  reacting  with  normal  organs 
and  to  leave  behind  the  anti-tumor  fraction ;  also  the  anti-carcinoma  fraction 
can  be  specifically  absorbed  with  carcinoma  extract,  so  that  in  the  end  only 
the  sarcoma  antibody  is  left  in  the  immune  serum.  It  seems,  then,  from  these 
and  other  experiments,  that  antibodies  can  be  produced  against  constituents 
which  are  specific  for  cancers  in  general,  but  that  antigenic  differences  exist 
between  the  various  kinds  of  tumors.  These  antibodies,  and  therefore  also 
the  antigens  producing  them,  may  or  may  not  carry  species  differentials. 
However,  somewhat  different  are  the  more  recent  results  of  Lehmann-Facius 
(1932),  who  finds  that  ether  extracts  of  mouse  intestines  may  induce  the 
formation  of  antisera,  which  react  with  cancer  extracts  of  a  lipoid  nature; 
lipoid  antigens  which  are  present  in  cancer  do  not  need,  therefore,  to  be 
specific  for  the  latter,  but  may  occur  also  in  normal  organs. 

It  is  possible  to  obtain  anti-cancer  sera  under  conditions  in  which  species- 
specific  immune  bodies  do  not  develop,  as  for  instance,  when  boiled  antigens 
are  injected ;  but  such  methods  do  not  exclude  the  production  of  organ-specific 
immune  sera.  Some  of  these  observations  suggest  that  the  antibodies  which 
are  common  to  various  anti-carcinoma  sera  are  organ-specific  constituents,  and 
that,  correspondingly,  the  change  in  the  constitution  of  normal  cells,  which 
leads  to  their  transformation  into  cancer  cells,  represents  a  change  in  the 
organ  rather  than  in  the  organismal  differentials,  which  latter  seem  to  be 
essentially  the  same  in  cancer  and  in  normal  cells.  Accordingly,  Witebsky's 
method  of  injecting  cancer  globulins  for  preparing  immune  sera  against  can- 
cer, can  be  readily  used  also  for  the  preparation  of  organ-specific  immune 
sera  if,  instead  of  cancer  globulins,  globulins  from  various  organs  are  taken 
as  antigens. 

But,  there  are  still  further  differences  between  antigens  obtained  from  cancer 
and  from  normal  tissues.  According  to  Witebsky,  in  carcinoma  cells  the  lipoids 
may  exist  in  a  state  which  makes  them  readily  available  as  antigens,  while 
in  normal  organs  they  are  less  available,  perhaps  because  they  are  bound  to 
other  cell  constituents. 

There  are  some  additional  indications  of  the  presence  of  specific  cancer 
antigens.  Hirszfeld  and  Halber,  assuming  that  there  are  immune  substances 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  429 

against  cancer  antigens  in  the  serum  of  cancer  patients,  mixed  alcohol  extracts 
from  a  human  carcinoma  with  the  blood  serum  of  patients  suspected  of  cancer 
and  observed  a  specific  complement  fixation.  A  positive  reaction  was  obtained 
irrespective  of  the  organ  in  which  the  carcinoma  had  arisen.  However,  other 
investigators  consider  this  test  as  non-specific,  or  at  best,  as  successful  in 
only  a  small  number  of  instances.  Lehmann-Facius,  in  order  to  demonstrate 
the  presence  of  specific  immune  substances  in  the  serum  of  cancer  patients, 
used  the  euglobulin  fraction  of  the  serum  and  the  phosphatid  fraction  of 
tumor  extracts.  Also,  the  diagnostic  cancer  reactions  of  Freund  and  Kaminer, 
of  Willheim  and  Stern,  and  of  Fuchs,  are  based  on  the  assumption  that  in 
the  serum  of  cancer  patients  substances  are  circulating  which  are  specific 
for  all  kinds  of  human  cancer,  which  develop  in  response  to  antigens  charac- 
teristic of  cancer,  and  which  interact  with  these  antigens  in  a  specific  manner. 
The  substances  present  in  the  cancer  sera  may  be  either  proteolytic  or  lipolytic. 
Moreover,  not  only  human  cancers,  but  also  animal  cancers,  may  contain 
these  antigens.  But  there  is  still  some  difference  of  opinion  as  to  the  degree 
of  specificity  attaching  to  these  various  tests. 

We  have  already  referred  to  the  experiments  of  Lumsden,  who  believes 
that  besides  preformed  natural  and  experimentally  produced  immune  sub- 
stances which  are  species-specific,  there  exist  in  the  serum  constituents  which 
act  in  a  specific  manner  on  various  kinds  of  cancer  cells  growing  in  vitro, 
although  they  are  able  to  injure,  also,  reticuloendothelial  cells  growing  out 
from  pieces  of  spleen  in  tissue  culture.  As  stated,  it  is  not  certain  at  present 
whether  these  reactions  are  due  to  the  species  differentials  present  in  cancer 
and  in  spleen  tissue,  or  whether  they  are  due  to  "antimalignancy"  antigens, 
calling  forth  the  production  of  the  corresponding  antibodies.  On  the  whole, 
the  evidence  seems  to  point  to  the  conclusion  that  the  reactions  which  Lumsden 
observed  were  caused  by  species  differentials,  therefore,  by  organismal  differ- 
entials, and  not  by  a  special  kind  of  antigen,  designated  by  this  investigator 
as  "antimalignancy"  antigens.  More  recently,  Mann  and  Welker  produced 
in  rabbits,  injected  with  preparations  from  various  types  of  human  cancer, 
antisera  which  contained  precipitins  for  the  proteins  present  in  autolysed 
carcinoma,  but  not  as  a  rule  for  proteins  from  normal  human  tissues ;  these 
immune  substances  reacted  also  with  the  blood  serum  from  cancer  patients, 
and  most  strongly  with  the  serum  of  patients  that  were  bearers  of  the  same 
kind  of  carcinoma  as  the  one  from  which  the  antigens  that  were  used  in  the 
preparation  of  the  precipitins  had  been  obtained.  This  suggests  that  the  specific 
carcinomatous  proteins  are  present  also  in  the  blood  of  cancer  patients.  Such 
serum  is  species-specific;  it  reacts  only  with  human  sera,  not  with  those  of 
various  animal  species.  These  precipitins  were  therefore,  specific  for  protein 
from  carcinoma  and  at  the  same  time  they  were  species-specific. 

There  is,  furthermore,  noticeable  in  some  of  the  diagnostic  tests  for  cancer 
mentioned  above,  a  similarity  between  the  reactions  of  cancer  sera  and  of 
embryonal  or  pregnancy  sera;  embryonal  cells  may  be  affected  by  these  sera 
in  a  similar  manner  to  cancer  cells,  and  in  embryonal  tissue,  antigens  similar 
to  cancer  antigens  may  be  present.  Moreover,  Hirszfeld  and  Dmochowski 


430  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

have  shown  that  spontaneous  as  well  as  long-transplanted  tumors,  and  also 
rapidly  growing  embryonal  tissues,  contain  antigens  which  are  also  present 
in  dying  leucocytes  (pus)  and  in  necrotic  tissue.  Antigens  which  are  common 
to  long-transplanted  tumors  and  pus  are  species-specific;  for  instance,  the 
Brown-Pearce  rabbit  carcinoma  has  an  antigen  in  common  with  rabbit  pus, 
and  the  guinea  pig  liposarcoma  has  an  antigen  in  common  with  guinea  pig  pus. 

We  have  already  mentioned  the  fact  that  in  the  sera  of  animals  which  bear 
virus-induced  cancers  antibodies  may  be  demonstrable,  which  are  directed 
against  the  virus.  Such  sera  may  contain  substances  which  neutralize  the  virus, 
or  in  combining  with  a  virus  antigen,  call  forth  complement  fixation  or  lead  to 
the  formation  of  precipitates.  Thus  the  filtrable  Rous  fowl  sarcoma  contains 
virus  antigen  which  may  induce  in  the  blood  of  geese,  injected  with  the  tumor 
extract,  antibodies  against  this  virus  (Rous,  Robertson  and  Oliver).  Similar 
immune  substances  may  be  demonstrated  in  the  serum  of  chickens  in  which 
such  tumors  have  retrogressed  (Rous,  Mottram).  They  may  also  develop  in 
bearers  of  slowly  growing  tumors  of  this  kind  (Andrewes)  and  one  kind  of 
tumor  may  elicit  the  production  of  antibodies  which  interact  also  with  the 
virus  of  a  different  type  of  fowl  sarcoma.  According  to  Peyton  Rous  and 
Kidd,  the  growth  of  the  rabbit  papilloma,  which  is  caused  by  a  virus,  as  well 
as  carcinoma  which  develops  from  this  papilloma,  may  give  rise  to  specific 
immune  substances  circulating  in  the  serum  of  the  bearer  of  this  newformation. 
In  saline  extracts  of  the  cottontail  rabbit  papillomas,  a  serologically  specific 
substance  can  be  demonstrated,  which  probably  is  identical  with  the  Shope 
papilloma  virus.  It  is  of  special  importance  that,  according  to  Rous,  if  a 
papilloma  virus-induced  carcinoma  develops  in  domestic  rabbits,  the  virus  is 
no  longer  demonstrable  in  the  tumor  extracts;  but  the  presence  of  such  a 
virus  can  be  made  very  probable,  because  specific  antibodies  against  the 
papilloma  virus  are  demonstrable  in  the  blood  serum  of  these  rabbits.  Similarly, 
Andrewes  has  shown  that  when  sarcoma  is  produced  in  fowl  by  injection  of 
carcinogenic  substances  and  a  filtrable  agent  cannot  be  shown  to  exist  in  this 
tumor  by  direct  methods,  the  presence  of  a  hidden  agent  in  the  tumor  may  be 
made  probable  by  means  of  immune  substances  which  can  be  shown  to  exist 
in  the  blood  serum  of  the  fowl.  Kidd  found,  with  the  aid  of  the  complement 
fixation  method,  an  antigen  in  the  extract  of  the  Brown-Pearce  rabbit  car- 
cinoma ;  this  antigen  was  not  of  the  same  type  as  the  antigens  present  in 
normal  rabbit  organs,  nor  was  such  an  antigen  noted  in  tumors  occurring  in 
the  uterus  of  the  rabbit ;  but  this  antigen  was  also  distinct  from  the  rabbit 
papilloma  antigen  and  the  presence  of  a  virus  has  not  so  far  been  demonstrated 
in  the  Brown-Pearce  rabbit  carcinoma. 

In  this  connection  it  may  also  be  of  interest  to  recall  the  experiments  of 
Furth  on  transplantation  of  leukemic  cells  from  a  case  of  leukosis  which  arose 
in  Fx  hybrids  between  two  strains  of  mice  differing  markedly  in  their  tendency 
to  become  leukemic.  The  results  of  transplantations  from  Ft  hybrids  to  both 
parent  strains  could  not  be  interpreted  merely  as  due  to  differences  in  the 
relationships  of  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  two  parent  strains  and 
the  hybrids.  We  suggested  that  exogenous  growth  stimuli  (Ge),  acting  spe- 


IMMUNITY  IN  TUMOR  TRANSPLANTATION  431 

cifically  on  the  transplanted  leucocytes,  might  be  responsible  for  the  peculiari- 
ties noted. 

There  exist,  then,  tumors  in  which  an  extraneous  growth  stimulus  (virus) 
determines  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  transplant  and  the  specificity  of 
the  immune  sera.  In  other  cases  the  reaction  may  be  determined  by  growth 
stimuli  intrinsic  in  the  cancerous  cells  (Gi).  These  stimuli  may  perhaps  be 
similar  to  factors  active  in  embryonal  tissue,  although  in  some  very  essential 
respects  conditions  prevailing  in  tumors  and  embryonal  tissues  differ.  In  still 
other  instances,  perhaps,  substances  related  to  tissue  and  organ  differentials, 
such  as  those  present  in  pus  and  necrotic  tissue,  may  give  rise  to  immune  sub- 
stances. However,  definite  data  as  to  the  nature  of  some  of  the  antigenic  sub- 
stances found  in  these  cancers,  and  also  in  leukemia,  which  would  differentiate 
them  from  normal  tissues,  are  as  yet  lacking.  Moreover,  some  characteristics 
of  tumors  may  change  in  the  course  of  serial  transplantations ;  we  have  dis- 
cussed the  probable  nature  of  these  changes  in  a  preceding  chapter.  Dmochow- 
ski,  in  the  case  of  some  mammalian  tumors,  found  indications  that  also  the 
antigens  may  change  as  the  result  of  long-continued  serial  transplantations. 
Similar  are  the  recent  observations  of  MacDowell  and  his  associates  in  mouse 
leukemia.  Mice  belonging  to  strain  C58  clevelop  leukemia  in  a  very  large  per- 
centage of  cases.  Leukemic  cells  from  a  C58  animal  with  spontaneous  leukemia 
can  readily  be  transplanted  into  other  C58  mice,  where  they  proliferate  and 
so  transfer  their  disease  to  the  hosts.  When  several  lines  of  leukemic  cells 
were  propagated  through  a  large  number  of  generations  of  C58  mice,  in  the 
course  of  these  passages  the  cells  gained  in  proliferative  power  and  transmitted 
the  disease  more  readily  to  other  C58  mice.  MacDowell  found  that,  through 
graded  inoculation  with  increasing  doses  of  such  leukemic  cells,  C58  mice  can 
be  immunized  against  these  various  propagated  lines,  so  that  in  the  end  the 
transfer  of  such  cells  no  longer  calls  forth  leukemia  in  mice  thus  treated.  But, 
if  a  C58  mouse,  immunized  against  these  special  lines  of  C58  leukemic  cells, 
is  inoculated  with  cells  taken  directly  from  a  case  of  leukemia  arising  spon- 
taneously in  a  C58  mouse,  then  the  inoculated  mouse  succumbs  to  the  disease. 
The  immunization  with  the  serially  propagated  leukemic  cells  from  strain  C58 
protects  only  against  these  special  propagated  lines,  but  not  against  new 
leukemic  cells  which  have  not  yet  been  propagated  in  passages.  It  appears 
therefore,  as  if,  as  a  result  of  the  serial  propagation,  not  only  did  the  leukemic 
cells  acquire  a  greater  growth  energy  and  become  therefore  more  virulent, 
but  there  must  also  have  taken  place  in  all  the  serially  propagated  lines  the 
same  type  of  modification  of  the  antigen,  which  made  this  antigen  different 
from  that  present  in  the  leukemic  cells  from  primary  spontaneous  cases.  As 
to  the  nature  of  this  antigen,  it  may  represent  an  intrinsic  stimulus  or  an 
extrinsic  virus,  or  something  akin  to  a  tissue  or  organ  differential ;  but  for 
the  reasons  stated,  it  is  not  probable  that  this  antigen  or  any  of  the  special 
tumor  antigens  originate  as  a  result  of  somatic  mutations  occurring  in  the 
cells.  There  occurs  then,  in  cancer  cells,  in  addition  to  the  organismal  differen- 
tials, various  other  kinds  of  antigens,  but  there  remains  some  doubt  at  the 
present  time  as  to  the  nature  of  some  of  these  antigens  of  the  second  type. 


Chapter  $ 
Tumor  Growth  and  Organismal  Differentials 

In  the  preceding  chapters  the  principal  facts  concerning  the  significance  of 
organismal  differentials  for  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors  have  been 
analyzed.  The  concept  of  organismal  differentials  has  contributed  in 
various  ways  to  the  understanding  of  tumor  transplantation  and  of  the  im- 
munity against  transplanted  tumors;  and  conversely,  the  analysis  of  tumor 
growth  has  contributed  to  the  understanding  of  the  organismal  differentials. 
It  is  for  these  reasons  that  we  have  discussed  also  the  various  factors  which 
interact  with  the  organismal  differentials  in  tumor  growth.  In  concluding,  it 
will  be  of  interest  to  trace  the  development  of  the  various  concepts  and  theories 
relating  to  the  factors  which  are  of  importance  in  the  transplantation  of 
tumors.  Some  of  the  most  prominent  investigators  in  the  field  of  cancer  have 
contributed  to  these  studies,  and  while  certain  of  their  interpretations  have 
been  modified  in  the  course  of  time,  the  conclusions  they  expressed  and  the 
experiments  they  carried  out  in  support  of  them  helped  greatly  to  advance  our 
knowledge  of  the  nature  of  cancer  and  of  the  factors  active  in  transplantation. 

Jensen  in  his  transplantations  of  mouse  carcinoma  approached  the  facts  he 
discovered  from  the  point  of  view  of  the  bacteriologist  and  immunologist. 
It  had  been  found  possible  to  induce  immunity  against  various  diseases  caused 
by  microorganisms.  By  using  as  a  vaccine,  in  a  weakened  form  or  in  a  very 
small  quantity,  the  microorganisms  that  caused  the  disease  or  certain  of  their 
derivatives,  or  by  introducing  related  organisms  less  virulent  for  the  host  but 
sufficiently  related  to  the  causative  agent,  an  active  immunity  was  produced. 
These  studies  gave  direction  to  and  supplied  the  problems  for  Jensen's  work 
as  well  as  for  the  following  investigations  of  Ehrlich  and  Apolant,  and  also 
of  Bashford,  Murray,  Haaland,  Russell  and  Cramer.  In  the  beginning  it  was 
assumed  that  cancer  cells  differ  in  various  ways  from  ordinary  tissue  cells 
and  that  the  laws  relating  to  the  transplantation  of  tumors  differ  in  some 
essential  respects  from  those  governing  ordinary  tissue  cells.  Thus  Ehrlich 
applied  the  same  principles  in  explaining  immunity  against  cancer  and  im- 
munity against  microorganisms ;  he  explained  both  on  the  basis  of  his  nutri- 
ceptor  and  athrepsia  concepts.  However,  Bashford  and  his  associates,  Murray, 
Russell  and  Cramer,  soon  recognized  important  differences  between  these  two 
types  of  immunity,  and  one  of  the  most  essential  was  the  fact  that  a  formation 
of  antibodies  against  the  ordinary  transplantable  tumor  could  not  be  demon- 
strated in  the  case  of  tumor  immunity;  they  substituted  therefore  the  term 
"resistance"  for  that  of  "immunity."  But  even  these  investigators  considered 
the  problem  of  immunity  or  induced  resistance  against  tumor  growth  as  the 
principal  problem  of  tumor  growth. 

Although  soon  some  facts  were  established,  which  proved  certain  similari- 
ties between  the  behavior  of  tumors  and  of  normal  tissues,  still  the  immunity 

432 


TUMOR  GROWTH  433 

against  tumors  retained  distinctive  features  and  there  was  the  expectation  and 
hope  that  a  study  of  immunity  against  transplanted  tumors  might  lead  to  the 
discovery  of  methods  of  immunization  also  against  spontaneous  tumors,  which 
would  prevent  their  development  or  cause  the  retrogression  of  tumors  which 
had  already  developed.  Similar  views  were  held,  also,  by  subsequent  in- 
vestigators, Tyzzer,  Woglom,  Uhlenhuth,  Chambers  and  Scott,  Caspari, 
Lewin  and  Lumsden. 

We  approached  the  problem  of  tumor  transplantation  essentially  from  the 
point  of  view  of  the  experimental  analysis  of  tissue  growth,  and  from  the 
beginning  we  emphasized  the  parallelism  between  the  behavior  of  tumors  and 
normal  tissues  after  transplantation.  The  favorable  results  of  autotransplanta- 
tion  were  attributed  to  the  similarity  in  the  constitution  of  host  and  spon- 
taneous tumor,  and  the  reactions  in  homoiotransplantation,  and  the  still 
stronger  reactions  in  heterotransplantation,  were  correspondingly  interpreted 
as  due  to  the  relative  strangeness  of  the  constitution  of  host  and  transplanted 
tumor.  In  this  sense  we  explained  also  the  experimentally  produced  variations 
in  growth  energy  of  tumor  cells  which  we  had  observed  under  various  condi- 
tions, and  the  conclusion  was  drawn  by  us  that  the  potential  immortality  of 
tumor  cells  which  the  serial  transplantation  of  tumors  had  revealed  was  not 
peculiar  to  tumors,  but  was  shared  by  the  majority  of  normal  tissues,  at  least 
by  all  of  those  that  could  give  origin  to  tumors.  A  comparison  of  the  struc- 
tural changes  of  normal  tissues  and  tumors  after  transplantation  and  of 
cellular  reactions  taking  place  around  them  revealed  additional  similarities, 
and  it  was  possible  to  distinguish  between  the  constitutional  factors,  which 
would  permit  the  tumor  cells  to  live  in  the  host,  and  the  increased  proliferative 
tendency  inherent  in  the  tumor  cells,  which  enabled  them  to  grow  after 
transplantation.  A  distinction  was  made  also  between  transplantability  and 
the  factors  determining  the  growth  energy  of  tumors  and  at  the  same  time 
the  analysis  of  the  constitutional  factors  underlying  these  conditions  was 
further  developed.  There  was  noticeable  a  great  similarity  in  the  behavior  of 
normal  tissues  and  tumors  after  auto-,  homoio-  and  heterotransplantation. 

These  points  of  view  were  extended  by  Peyton  Rous,  who  (1910)  compared 
the  immunity  against  embryonal  tissues  and  against  tumor  tissues,  when  both 
tissues  grew  side  by  side  in  the  same  host.  He  found  that  immunization  against 
embryonal  tissue,  and  that  against  tumor  tissue,  took  a  similar  course.  A  few 
years  later  (1916)  we  further  compared  the  reactions  of  the  host  against 
transplanted  normal  and  tumor  tissue,  and  we  observed  in  both  instances  a 
parallel  reaction  of  the  lymphocytes  and  connective  tissue  of  the  host  against 
the  transplant.  Thus  there  was  formed  gradually  on  the  basis  of  these  com- 
parative studies  of  tissue  and  tumor  transplantation,  the  concept  of  organismal 
differentials  as  the  essential  factors  underlying  both  of  these  processes. 

A  definite  divergence  existed,  therefore,  between  these  two  tendencies  in  the 
development  of  cancer  research,  and  especially  in  the  study  of  the  transplanta- 
tion of  tumors ;  in  the  one,  the  immunity  against  tumors  was  the  central  prob- 
lem, in  the  other,  it  was  the  comparative  behavior  of  normal  and  tumor  tissues. 
However,  this  distinction  was  not  quite  so  complete  as  it  might  appear.  Thus, 


434  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

in  our  early  analysis  of  tumor  transplantation  we  admitted  the  possibility  that 
extraneous  agents  might  be  concerned  in  the  growth  of  tumors,  and  this  sug- 
gested a  possible  difference  in  the  behavior  of  normal  tissues  and  of  tumors. 
Our  findings  regarding  the  difference  between  the  results  of  auto-  and 
homoiotransplantation  of  tumors,  the  observations  of  Schoene  and  Bashford 
that  an  immunity  against  tumors  could  be  produced  by  inoculation  of  normal 
tissues,  but  that  it  was  impossible  to  immunize  with  autogenous  tissues 
(Apolant,  Woglom),  as  well  as  the  behavior  of  heterotransplanted  tumors, 
suggested  also  to  Ehrlich  and  Bashford  that  in  tumor  immunity  there  may  be 
a  component  directed  against  the  tumor  as  a  tissue  and  not  as  a  tumor.  Ehrlich 
even  went  so  far  as  to  state  that  tumors  showed  in  this  respect  a  greater 
specificity  than  normal  tissues,  inasmuch  as  he  assumed  that  the  latter  could 
be  successfully  transplanted  between  individuals  belonging  to  different  but 
hybridizable  varieties,  while  it  was  difficult  to  transplant  tumors  even  to  dif- 
ferent strains  within  the  same  species ;  and  Bashford,  Murray  and  Cramer  in- 
terpreted the  condition  following  retrogression  of  a  tumor,  which  was  desig- 
nated as  panimmunity  by  Ehrlich,  not  as  due  to  a  specific  tumor  immunity  but 
as  directed  against  the  tissues  of  which  the  tumor  was  composed.  In  a  similar 
manner  Bashford  and  Russell  (1910)  explained  the  immunity  produced 
against  a  second  heterogenous  tumor  through  a  first  inoculation  with  the  same 
heterogenous  tumor;  in  this  case,  too,  they  assumed  that  the  immunity  was' 
directed  not  against  the  tumor  but  against  the  tissues.  Some  years  later 
Murphy  transplanted  not  only  heterogenous  tumors,  but  also  heterogenous 
embryonal  tissue,  into  the  chick  allantois  and  found  that  both  tumor  and 
embryonal  cells  behaved  similarly  under  these  conditions,  although  he  stressed 
the  results  obtained  with  tumors  rather  than  those  obtained  with  embryonal 
tissues.  Little  also,  in  1922,  using  more  closely  inbred  strains  of  mice,  com- 
pared the  genetic  factors  underlying  the  transplantation  of  tumor  tissues 
with  those  effective  in  the  transplantation  of  normal  spleen  from  points  of 
view  similar  to  our  own. 

Yet  notwithstanding  these  analogies  between  the  growth  of  tumors  and 
normal  tissues,  which  began  to  accumulate  more  and  more,  the  large  majority 
of  authors  still  conceived  tumor  growth  and  tumor  immunity  as  essentially 
distinct  from  the  growth  and  immunity  of  normal  tissues.  This  was  true,  as 
mentioned,  of  Ehrlich  as  well  as  of  Bashford  and  his  associates.  The  latter 
saw  one  of  the  characteristic  features  of  tumor  immunity  in  the  lack  of  stroma 
reaction,  as  first  defined  by  Russell.  Moreover,  they  attributed  all  the  reac- 
tions of  the  host  against  tumors  to  an  induced  active  immunity  against  tumors 
(Russell),  in  contradistinction  to  the  writer's  subsequently  defined  concept  of 
preformed  individuality  differentials,  to  which  the  primary  reaction  against  the 
homoiogenous  transplant,  in  the  case  of  normal  as  well  as  of  tumor  tissues,  was 
attributed ;  also,  the  active  immunity  against  tumors  was  considered  by  us  as 
resulting  from  differences  in  organismal  differentials  between  host  and  tumor. 
Tyzzer,  who  recognized  the  importance  of  hereditary  constitutional  factors  in 
the  immunity  against  tumors,  likewise  accepted  Russell's  interpretation;  in 
estimating  the  factors  which  determine  the  transplantability  of  tumors  and 


TUMOR  GROWTH  435 

in  fixing  the  number  of  genes  for  this  purpose,  he  assumed  that  these  factors 
were  specific  determinants  of  tumor  immunity,  and  that  they  did  not  apply  to 
tissues  in  general. 

These  differences  in  the  theories  of  various  investigators  are  shown  more 
clearly  in  additional  investigations.  Jensen    (1908-1909)    compared  tumors 
growing  after  transplantation  into  other  individuals  with  metastases  of  spon- 
taneous tumors,  an  interpretation  subsequently  expressed  by  various  other 
authors.  He  believed,  furthermore,  that  if  a  change  in  diet  can  affect  trans- 
plantability  of  tumors — as  it  apparently  did  in  Haaland's  experiments — it 
might  equally  influence  metastasis  formation.  No  distinction  is  recognized 
here  between  the  conditions  in  auto-  and  in  homoiotransplantation.  On  the 
other  hand,  Bashford,  Murray  and  Cramer  made  a  sharp  distinction  between 
the  conditions  that  cause  the  formation  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  and  those 
determining  the  growth  of  a  tumor  once  it  has  formed ;  they  were  led  to  this 
distinction  by  the  observation  that  an  animal  unsuccessfully  inoculated  with 
a  transplantable  homoiogenous  tumor,  subsequently  could  develop  a  spon- 
taneous tumor.  They  did  not,  however,  distinguish  in  these  cases  between  the 
development  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  possessing  the  same  or  almost  the  same 
individuality  differentials  as  the  host  and  the  growth  of  homoiogenous  (trans- 
planted) tumors,  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  of  tumor  and  host 
differ;  this  can  be  seen  from  their  statement  that  they  observed — evidently 
contrary  to  their  expectations — that  animals  affected  by  spontaneous  cancers 
are  not  greatly  more  susceptible  to  inoculation  with  cancerous  tissue  than  are 
normal  animals.  They  believed  that  spontaneous  tumors  which  do  not  grow 
in  other  animals  of  the  same  species  not  affected  by  cancerous  growth,  rarely 
grow  when  transplanted  to  other  parts  of  the  animal's  own  body,  and  not 
at  all  in  other  animals  bearing  spontaneous  tumors ;  there  was  no  need,  there- 
fore, for  any  subsidiary  assumption  as  to  the  importance  of  a  constitutional 
condition  inherent  in  the  normal  cells  of  the  animal  in  which  the  tumor  origi- 
nated and  in  the  fully  developed  tumor  cells  for  the  growth  of  spontaneous 
cancer  after  transplantation.  What  these  authors  called  "individuality"  of 
tumors  was  not  the  chemical  constitution  of  the  tumor  cells  as  determined  by 
genetic  factors;  identity  of  individuality  did  not  mean  identity  in  chemical 
composition  of  cells  due  to  genetic  factors,  but  it  was  considered  to  be  the 
result  of  identity  of  the  sum  total  of  changes  which  had  taken  place  in  the 
tumor  cells,  in  consequence  of  past  experiences  in  the  life  of  the  organism. 
According  to  this  conception,  every  individual  mouse  was  therefore  different 
from  all  the  others,  and  this  difference  would  increase  with  the  increasing 
length  of  life  of  the  animal.  This  point  of  view  is  expressed  in  a  paper  by 
Bashford,  Murray  and  Cramer  on  the  resistance  of  mice  to  the  growth  of 
cancer  (1907). 

Bashford  and  his  collaborators  attributed  differences  in  transplantability 
of  tumors  to  factors  inherent  in  the  host  as  well  as  to  variable  factors  which 
distinguish  different  tumors.  Among  the  latter  they  also  recognized  the  sig- 
nificance of  the  growth  energy  of  the  tumor,  and  they  insisted  especially  on 
the  great  significance  of  growth  rhythms  in  tumor  cells  which  occur  spon- 


436  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

taneously  and  in  which  periods  of  depression  and  of  great  intensity  of  growth 
alternate;  tumor  cells  which  are  in  the  phase  of  depression  offer  great  diffi- 
culty to  transplantation.  There  were  two  facts  known  at  that  time  which 
demonstrated  the  dependence  of  the  fate  of  the  transplant  on  factors  which 
are  present  also  in  normal  tissues,  namely,  the  difference  in  the  results  of 
auto-  and  homoiotransplantation  of  tumors,  and  the  species-specificity  of  the 
antigens  in  normal  tissues  which  immunized  a  host  against  the  growth  of  a 
transplant,  the  latter  indicating  a  parallelism  between  immune  reactions  against 
tumors  and  against  normal  tissues  and  their  proteins.  Bash  ford,  Murray  and 
Cramer  pointed  out  the  species-specific  factors  in  the  production  of  immunity 
against  tumors  and  in  the  production  of  hemolysins  and  precipitins.  Yet,  they 
considered  the  immunity  against  transplanted  homoiogenous  tumors  as  due 
to  a  lack  of  the  stroma  reaction,  a  special  phenomenon  not  heretofore  de- 
scribed in  the  transplantation  of  normal  tissues.  Moreover,  as  stated,  they 
did  not  attribute  the  specificity  of  the  tumor  tissue  to  its  genetic  constitution, 
but  to  environmental  factors  which  induce  processes  of  adaptation  in  the 
tumor  to  the  organism  in  which  it  develops.  These  investigators  conclude  that 
the  "influence  of  individuality,  i.e.,  the  sum  total  of  changes  due  to  the  past 
life  of  the  organism,  will  be  to  make  any  mouse  different  from  all  the  others 
and  these  differences  will  increase  the  longer  the  animal  lives."  In  the  new 
host  the  environment  is  so  strange  that  the  cells  cannot  survive  the  interrup- 
tion of  their  nutrition.  Their  failure  to  grow  does  not  necessarily  imply  that 
they  would  fail  to  proliferate  in  their  new  hosts  if  the  conditions  to  which 
they  had  been  accustomed  would  be  immediately  supplied  in  the  experiment. 
"Cells  which  have  lived  and  have  become  accustomed  to  the  bodyfluids  of  one 
mouse  for,  say,  two  years,  may  easily  die  or  fail  to  adapt  themselves  when 
transferred  to  the  bodies  of  new  animals."  Autogenous  tissues  would  then 
differ  from  homoiogenous  tissues  in  that  the  former  have  had  a  chance  to 
adapt  themselves  to  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  while  homoiogenous  tissues 
have  not  had  such  an  opportunity.  It  is  evident  that  this  conception  differs 
in  some  very  essential  respects  from  the  conception  of  the  organismal  differen- 
tials. The  organismal  differentials  are  the  derivatives,  the  phenotypic  mani- 
festations of  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  fertilized  germ  cells  and  of  the 
tissues.  The  organismal  differentials  in  host  and  transplant  and  their  mutual 
relationship  represent  the  constitutional  factors  which  determine  transplanta- 
bility  of  normal  tissues  and  also  of  tumors ;  other  factors  also  enter  into  this 
process. 

Bash  ford,  Haaland,  Woglom,  and  more  recently,  Lumsden,  attributed 
therefore  the  transplantability  of  a  tumor,  in  the  main,  to  secondary  processes 
of  adaptation  which  take  place  between  the  tumor  and  the  host  in  which  it 
originated,  or  into  which  it  had  been  transplanted.  The  origin  as  well  as  the 
transplantability  of  tumors  would  therefore  depend  upon  variable,  fluctuating 
factors.  It  is  especially  the  older  experiments  of  Haaland  which  suggested 
this  point  of  view.  Haaland  believed  that  he  had  shown  the  apparent  influence 
of  environmental,  and  especially  of  nutritional,  conditions  on  the  character  of 
the  animals  and  their  ability  to  serve  as  hosts  of  transplanted  tumors.  But 


TUMOR  GROWTH  437 

also  the  more  recent  work  of  Lumsden  concerning  the  adaptation  of  tumors  to 
the  action  of  heterogenous  serum,  resulting  from  a  temporary  growth  in  a 
strange  species,  was  in  conformity  with  this  view.  While  there  is  much  evi- 
dence for  the  conclusion  that  tumor  cells  may  display  a  remarkable  ability  of 
adaptation  to  new  environments,  the  transplantability  of  tumors  is  determined 
above  all  by  the  relation  of  their  organismal  differentials  to  those  of  their 
hosts.  Haaland  and  Woglom  were  struck  by  the  observation  that  in  the  same 
individual  one  tumor,  a  spontaneous  cancer,  may  continue  to  grow,  while 
another,  a  transplanted  tumor,  retrogresses.  However,  such  an  occurrence 
is  to  be  expected  if  we  consider  the  great  similarity  or  identity  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  in  the  host  tissues  and  in  the  spontaneous  tumors  and 
their  differences  from  those  of  the  strange  transplanted  tumors.  The  impor- 
tance of  the  relation  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  host  and 
transplant  had  not  yet  been  recognized  by  Haaland,  who  attributed  the  dif- 
ference in  the  fate  of  the  two  tumors  to  local  conditions  residing  in  the 
tumor  cells.  Indeed,  the  sharp  distinction  between  autogenous  and  homoiog- 
enous  tumors  which  the  theory  of  the  individuality  differentials  implies 
had  not  yet  been  made  by  the  majority  of  authors.  Thus  as  late  as  1916, 
Tyzzer  applied  the  findings  concerning  the  growth  of  homoiogenous  tumors 
to  the  explanation  of  the  origin  of  spontaneous  tumors.  He  compared  the  lack 
of  development  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  with  the  non-take  of  a  homoiogenous 
tumor  and  defined  the  factors  which  prevent  a  spontaneous  tumor  from 
developing  or  from  expanding  as  immunity;  the  means  for  regulating  the 
growth  of  autogenous  tissues  were  considered  analogous  to  those  which  de- 
termine immunity  against  transplanted  tumors.  He  further  concluded  that 
spontaneous  tumors  must  have  feeble  antigenic  power  and  offer  effective 
resistance  to  the  normal  influences  which  inhibit  undue  tissue  growth ;  in  this 
way  the  continuous  growth  of  a  tumor  is  made  possible  in  the  animal  in  which 
it  originates.  Otherwise  reactions  sufficient  to  destroy  spontaneous  cancerous 
growths  would  occur  more  frequently.  A  spontaneous  tumor,  according  to 
this  investigator,  is  therefore  a  parasite  strange  to  the  host  and  it  owes  its 
origin  to  a  somatic  mutation.  Similarly,  L.  C.  Strong  and  his  associates  ex- 
pressed the  opinion  that  a  genetic  analysis  of  the  factors  underlying  tumor 
transplantation  will  explain  also  the  origin  of  spontaneous  tumors.  Inasmuch 
as  according  to  these  authors  it  is  possible  by  means  of  transplantation  to 
determine  the  specific  number  of  factors  (genes)  which  each  tumor  requires 
for  its  growth  in  a  strange  host,  it  was  perhaps  tacitly  assumed  that  the 
number  and  character  of  these  genes  explain  also  the  development  and  peculi- 
arities of  a  spontaneous  tumor. 

However,  it  follows  from  the  concept  of  organismal  differentials  that  an 
analysis  of  the  factors  underlying  transplantability  of  tumors  can  give  an 
insight  only  into  the  difference  between  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  host  and 
the  tumor  graft,  and  that  there  is  no  reason  for  assuming  that  the  hereditary 
conditions  which  favor  the  development  of  a  spontaneous  tumor  are  identical 
with  the  genetic  factors  which  would  be  required  for  the  growth  of  a  trans- 
planted tumor,  when  these  factors  are  determined  according  to  the  procedure 


438  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

used  by  Tyzzer,  Little  and  Strong.  Also,  Uhlenhuth,  who  recognized  the 
species-specific  characteristics  of  tumors,  has  not  apparently  considered  the 
relations  between  the  individuality  differentials  of  the  tumor  and  the  tissues 
of  the  host.  He  explained  the  low  degree  of  immunity  against  spontaneous 
tumors  by  the  assumption  that  the  defense  mechanism  against  parenterally 
introduced  cells  may  not  be  of  a  high  degree  of  efficiency.  Therefore,  pieces  of 
spontaneous  tumors,  even  if  they  possess  only  a  low  virulence,  can  be  re- 
inoculated  into  the  animal  in  which  they  originate.  Likewise,  Caspari  assumed 
that  the  factors,  in  particular  necro-hormones,  which  induce  immunity  against 
homoiogenous  tumors,  would  be  equally  effective  in  the  case  of  autogenous 
spontaneous  tumors.  Chambers  and  Scott  ( 1924)  regarded  immunity  against 
cancer  as  analogous  to  immunity  against  bacteria.  They  believed  a  substance 
is  given  off  during  the  early  stages  of  autolysis  of  tumor  cells,  which  acts  as 
antigen  and  elicits  immunity  against  the  cancerous  tssue.  The  reason  why 
spontaneous  tumors,  and  especially  human  spontaneous  tumors,  do  not  call 
forth  immunity  in  the  bearer,  in  contrast  to  transplanted  tumors,  is  that  in 
spontaneous  tumors  the  cells  are  healthy,  the  implication  being  that  for  this 
reason  they  do  not  give  off  the  immunizing  substances ;  yet,  there  can  be  no 
doubt  that  autolysing  and  necrotic  areas  are  frequently  found  also  in  spon- 
taneous tumors.  Similar  views  were  expressed  also  by  Woglom  (1919).  The 
ready  growth  of  spontaneous  tumors  in  the  animals  in  which  they  originate 
is  due  to  an  adaptation  which  has  taken  place  between  the  tumor  cells  and 
the  bodyfluids;  but  there  is  a  general  resistance  against  the  growth  of  spon- 
taneous tumors  as  well  as  against  transplanted  tumors  (1923),  and  further- 
more, it  needs  to  be  explained  why  resistance  cannot  be  established  in  all 
transplanted  tumors  (1922).  C.  Lewin  assumed  that  during  the  development 
of  a  spontaneous  tumor,  which  means,  during  the  transformation  of  normal 
tissue  cells  into  tumor  cells,  the  former  lose  the  characteristics  which  make 
them  constituent  parts  of  the  host  organism;  they  behave  like  foreign  cells. 
He  therefore  concluded  that  it  should  be  possible  to  elicit  an  immunity  reac- 
tion against  a  spontaneous,  as  well  as  against  a  transplanted  tumor.  A  cure 
of  a  spontaneous  tumor  would  depend  therefore  on  conditions  similar  to  those 
which  determine  the  retrogression  of  a  transplanted  tumor. 

This  analysis  shows  the  difference  between  the  views  which  have  been  ex- 
pressed by  some  of  the  most  prominent  investigators  concerning  the  distin- 
guishing features  of  tumor  growth,  the  relations  between  the  factors  which 
determine  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors  and  the  origin  and  further 
growth  of  spontaneous  tumors ;  it  also  presents  the  interpretations  which 
have  gradually  developed  in  conformity  with  the  theory  of  the  organismal 
differentials.  These  views  are  based  on  some  of  the  earlier  observations  on 
tumor  growth,  which  we  have  discussed  already,  and  on  a  comparison  of  the 
fate  of  transplanted  normal  and  tumor  tissues.  All  these  experiments,  as  well 
as  those  of  Tyzzer  and  Little,  and  especially  the  extensive  investigations  of 
Little  and  Strong  and  their  associates  on  the  transplantation  of  tumors  in 
closely  inbred  strains,  showed  the  importance  of  genetic  factors  in  tumor 
transplantations.  Nevertheless,  certain  differences  have  developed  between 


TUMOR  GROWTH  439 

the  theory  of  organismal  differentials,  based  on  the  comparative  studies  of 
transplantation  of  normal  tissues  and  of  tumors,  and  the  concepts  of  Little 
and  Strong.  These  authors,  did  not  determine  differences  which  existed  be- 
tween the  individuality  differentials  of  tumors  and  their  hosts,  but  they  dealt 
instead  with  certain  factors  which  they  believed  were  needed  in  a  specific 
manner  for  the  growth  of  transplanted  tumors. 

As  we  have  shown  in  the  foregoing  pages,  there  is  good  reason  for  assuming 
that  the  problem  of  the  transplantability  of  tumors  is  complicated  by  a  number 
of  variable  factors,  including  changes  in  growth  energy  of  the  tumor,  adapta- 
tion of  the  tumor  cells  to  the  hosts,  different  degrees  of  sensitiveness  of  differ- 
ent tissues  or  cells  to  injurious  conditions,  and  lastly,  processes  of  immunity, 
which  again  depend  upon  complex  conditions,  such  as  the  ability  of  the  tumor 
to  give  off  antigens  and  to  absorb  and  neutralize  antibodies.  While  genetic 
factors  enter  also  into  these  conditions  in  conformity  with  the  fact  that  the 
organismal  differentials  may  act  as  antigens  and  that  the  range  of  reactivity 
of  an  organism  to  environmental  conditions  is  limited  by  constitutional  fac- 
tors, still,  the  fact  that  also  external  factors  are  involved  in  these  processes 
makes  it  impossible  to  account  for  the  transplantability  of  tumors  entirely  on 
the  basis  of  Mendelian  heredity,  and  to  refer  modifications  of  transplantability 
entirely  to  genetic  mutations,  either  in  the  host  or  in  the  tumor  cells  them- 
selves. These  difficulties  have  been  discussed  in  the  preceding  chapters. 

As  to  the  relations  between  the  origin  of  spontaneous  tumors  and  the  fate 
of  transplanted  tumors,  it  is  certain  that  tumor  cells  even  more  than  regenerat- 
ing cells  have  properties  which  differ  from  those  of  normal  cells.  As  the 
result  of  acquired  characteristics,  tumor  cells  may  be  more  readily  accessible 
to  certain  injuries  than  some  types  of  normal  cells.  Various  physical  and 
chemical  agencies  affect  the  former  somewhat  differently  from  the  latter,  but 
the  changes  which  have  taken  place  during  the  cancerous  transformation  are 
in  all  probability  not  specific,  in  the  sense  that  they  depend  upon  alterations  in 
the  constitution  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  affected  tissues,  as  the 
result  of  which  it  would  be  possible  for  antibodies  to  develop  against  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  of  the  tumor  cells  in  the  host  in  which  they  originate. 

It  is  especially  the  recent  investigations  of  Blumenthal,  in  which  the  effects 
of  transplanted  normal  tissues  and  transplanted  tumors  on  the  distribution 
of  the  leucocytes  in  the  circulating  blood  were  compared,  which  again  con- 
firmed in  a  very  convincing  manner  the  essential  similarity  in  the  principles 
underlying  the  transplantation  of  both  normal  and  tumor  tissues,  and  which 
again  demonstrated  the  fact  that  in  both  instances  it  is  the  nature  of  the 
organismal  differentials  in  the  host  and  transplant  which  primarily  determines 
the  outcome  of  these  transplantations.  However,  in  addition  to  the  organismal 
differentials  which  normal  tissues  and  tumors  have  in  common,  there  occur 
other  substances  which  are  also  the  same  in  both  and  which  likewise  may 
function  as  antigens,  and  lastly  there  are  at  least  indications  that  various 
types  of  tumors  may  possess  specific  antigenic  substances  which  distinguish 
them  from  normal  tissues. 

Qrganismal  differentials  and  in  particular  individuality  differentials  are 


440  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

then  the  same  in  tumors  and  in  the  normal  tissues  in  which  the  tumors 
originate  and  these  differentials  are  among  those  substances  which  may  func- 
tion as  antigens  and  call  forth  immune  processes  against  transplanted  tumors. 
This  interpretation  is  not  invalidated  by  the  recent  experiments  of  L.  Gross  in 
which  it  has  been  shown  that,  if  in  the  inbred  strain  C3H  after  transplantation 
of  a  tumor  originating  in  another  mouse  belonging  to  this  strain,  this  tumor 
undergoes  complete  regression,  after  a  preliminary  period  of  growth,  the 
inoculated  mouse  has  acquired  thereby,  at  least  in  a  number  of  cases,  an 
immunity  against  a  second  transplanted  tumor  of  the  same  type. 

Inasmuch  as  Gross  assumes  in  accordance  with  the  widely  prevalent  opinion 
that  in  strain  C3H  all  individuals  are  genetically  homozygous,  he  concludes 
that  tissue  constituents  as  such  of  one  mouse,  if  inoculated  into  another  in- 
dividual belonging  to  this  strain,  are  not  able  to  call  forth  immune  processes  in 
this  mouse  and  that  the  immunity  demonstrated  under  these  conditions  must 
be  due  to  factors  other  than  constituents  which  normal  tissues  and  tumors 
have  in  common.  However  actually  a  fully  homozygous  condition  has  not 
been  achieved  in  any  of  these  closely  inbred  strains  and  the  genetic  constitu- 
tion of  all  the  different  C3H  individuals  is  therefore  not  identical ;  and  inas- 
much as  the  method  used  by  Gross  makes  possible  the  demonstration  of  very 
fine  degrees  of  immunity,  it  might  be  expected  that  in  a  number  of  mice 
belonging  to  this  inbred  strain  an  immunity  can  be  shown  to  exist  under  the 
conditions  of  these  experiments.  If  the  interpretation  of  Gross  were  correct, 
it  should  be  possible  by  similar  means  to  call  forth  an  immunity  against  an 
autogenous  tumor,  in  the  mouse  in  which  the  tumor  originated.  But  even  if 
such  an  experiment  should  succeed,  which  is  not  very  probable,  it  would  not 
be  permissible  to  conclude  on  this  basis  that  the  individuality  differentials  can- 
not function  as  antigens  in  such  instances,  but  it  would  indicate  merely  that 
under  these  experimental  conditions  constituents  of  the  tumor  cells  other 
than  the  individuality  differentials  which  they  have  in  common  with  normal 
tissues,  acted  as  antigens. 

We  believe  that  the  organismal  differentials  in  tumors  and  in  normal  tissues 
from  which  they  have  developed  are  identical,  or  at  least  very  similar,  and 
that  the  transformation  of  normal  tissues  into  tumors  does  not  depend 
upon  changes  in  the  genes  which  determine  the  organismal  differentials, 
but  upon  conditions  which  are  comparable  to  changes  in  organ  and  tissue 
differentials,  although  they  are  not  necessarily  identical  with  these.  The  dif- 
ferences between  various  tumors,  arising  in  different  individuals  and  in  dif- 
ferent organs,  depend  upon  the  original  differences  in  the  organismal  and 
organ  differentials  of  the  individuals  and  of  the  tissues  in  which  they  develop, 
and  in  addition,  upon  certain  changes  of  a  special  character,  among  which 
the  production  of  specific  intrinsic  growth  factors  or  the  invasion  of  cells  by 
extrinsic  agents  or  viruses  may  play  a  role.  Additional  alterations  may  take 
place  during  the  life  of  a  tumor,  and  in  particular  during  serial  transplanta- 
tions, such  as  variations  in  growth  energy  or  adaptations  to  the  constitution  of 
new  hosts.  Future  investigations  must  determine  more  accurately  wherein 
these  changes  of  a  chemical  nature,  which  occur  during  the  transformation  of 


TUMOR  GROWTH  441 

normal  into  cancerous  tissue,  consist,  and  what  the  chemical  factors  are  which 
different  tumors  have  in  common. 

By  means  of  transplantation  of  tumors  a  considerable  plasticity  in  certain 
functions  of  the  cells  composing  tumors  has  been  revealed ;  this  plasticity  of 
function  is  superimposed  upon  and  interacts  with  the  constancy  of  the  in- 
dividuality differentials  of  these  tumors.  In  the  case  of  normal  tissues,  adap- 
tive processes  are  either  lacking  or  they  are  very  much  weaker  than  in  tumors, 
and  by  comparison  with  the  latter,  normal  adult  tissues  appear  relatively  rigid. 
Because  of  the  complexity  and  the  relatively  great  plasticity  in  the  reactions 
of  tumors,  the  behavior  of  tumors  presents  problems  of  great  biological  in- 
terest, especially  in  view  of  the  fact  that  tumors  are  transformed  normal  tis- 
sues, and  that  various  attributes  applying  to  tumors  apply,  therefore  poten- 
tially, also  to  normal  tissues.  But  these  attributes  become  manifest  only  when 
normal  cells,  undergoing  transformation  into  tumors,  have  reached  the 
equilibrium  of  cancer  cells. 


Piirf    "\7"  Organismal    and    Organ    Differentials    and    the 

Specificity  of  Tissue  Reactions 


Chapter  I 

The  Relative  Importance  of  Substratum  and  of 

Morphogenic  Substances  in  the  Specificity  of 

Tissue  Reactions,  and  the  Relation  of  These 

Factors  to  Organismal  Differentials 

IN  preceding  chapters  we  have  referred  to  the  relations  which  exist  be- 
tween organismal  and  organ  differentials,  and  the  role  which  morpho- 
genic contact  substances  play  in  the  differentiation  of  tissues,  organs, 
and  in  the  development  of  organ  differentials.  We  have  also  referred  to  the 
action  of  morphogenic  substances  affecting  tissues  at  a  distance  from  the  place 
of  origin  of  these  substances,  and  to  the  importance  of  gene-hormones  in  the 
realization  of  genetic  determinations.  In  this  chapter  we  shall  continue  this  dis- 
cussion and  analyze  additional  conditions  of  an  analogous  kind — some  of  which 
are  effective  also  in  the  adult  organism — in  which  the  specificity  in  structure 
and  function  depends  upon  and  also  manifests  itself  in  an  interaction  between 
hormones  and  factors  inherent  in  certain  tissues.  Transplantation  of  tissues, 
which  act  either  as  carriers  of  the  stimuli  or  represent  the  substratum,  was 
used  as  a  method  for  the  analysis  of  these  relationships  in  a  number  of  in- 
vestigations. This  specificity  may,  in  certain  cases,  manifest  itself  also  in  the 
differences  in  the  reactions  to  stimulating  or  inhibiting  factors  which  are 
observed  when  these  factors  act  on  the  tissues  of  different  individuals,  species, 
orders  or  classes  of  animals.  We  may  designate  the  latter  kind  of  relation  as 
an  organismal  specificity ;  and  if  this  organismal  specificity  is  of  such  a  nature 
that  the  stimulating  or  inhibiting  factor  originating  in  a  certain  individual, 
species,  order  or  class  of  animals,  is  more  effective  when  acting  on  tissues  of 
the  same  kind  of  individual,  species,  order  or  class,  than  when  acting  on 
tissues  of  another  kind  of  organisms,  then  we  have  to  deal  with  what  may 
be  designated  as  specific  organismal  adaptation  between  the  stimulating  or 
inhibiting  factor  and  the  recipient  tissue.  We  may  therefore  distinguish  three 
kinds  of  specificities:  (a)  simple  organ  or  tissue  specificity;  (b)  organismal 
specificity;  (c)  organismal  specific  adaptation. 

The  problem  may  arise  as  to  the  seat  of  the  specificity  of  the  reactions  in 
such  cases,  whether  it  is  the  hormones  and  other  distance  substances  or  the 
organs  in  which  they  originate,  or  the  tissues  on  which  they  act.  What  factor 
determines  the  differences  in  the  behavior  of  analogous  tissues  or  substances  in 
different  individuals,  species,  orders  or  classes,  or  the  differences  in  the  behavior 

443 


444  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  different  tissues  or  substances,  or  even  of  apparently  the  same  kind  of  tissues 
at  different  localities  within  the  same  individual?  Do  the  organismal  differen- 
tials cause  variations  in  the  hormones  and  the  tissues  in  which  they  originate 
or  in  the  recipient  tissues?  As  the  following  analysis  will  show,  as  a  rule  the 
specificity  in  the  reactions  in  these  cases  seems  to  reside  in  the  recipient  tissues 
rather  than  in  the  morphogenic  agents..  This  conclusion  is  in  accordance  with 
what  is  known  as  to  the  lack  of  organismal  differentials  in  hormones  in  the 
large  majority  of  cases  and  their  presence  in  the  tissues,  in  which  latter, 
therefore,  the  individuality  of  the  organism  predominantly  resides. 

A  simple  specificity  of  the  first  type  exists,  for  instance,  in  the  structure 
of  the  different  parts  of  the  uterine  cervix  and  in  the  graded  interaction  of 
this  organ  with  two  kinds  of  hormones.  We  shall  return,  here,  somewhat  more 
fully  to  this  condition,  to  which  we  have  already  referred  in  a  different  con- 
nection in  a  preceding  chapter. 

In  the  genital  tract  of  the  female  guinea  pig  there  exists  a  graded  change  in 
structure  in  the  direction  from  the  vagina  through  the  different  portions  of 
the  cervix  to  the  uterus,  and  correspondingly,  there  can  be  demonstrated 
experimentally  a  graded  responsiveness  of  these  tissues  to  the  two  ovarian 
hormones,  the  follicular  hormone  and  the  corpus  luteum  hormone.  The  grada- 
tion in  the  action  of  the  lutein  substance  is  in  an  opposite  direction  to  that  of 
the  follicular  hormone.  Thus  in  the  system  consisting  of  vagina,  cervix  and 
uterus,  the  response  to  the  follicular  hormone  is  strongest  in  the  vagina  and 
shows  a  graded  decrease  in  the  various  portions  of  the  cervix.  It  has  still  a 
definite  effect  of  its  own  in  the  uterus,  but  one  that  is  different  from  the 
effect  observed  in  vagina  and  cervix.  Through  increasing  the  amount  of 
follicular  hormone  the  reaction  in  the  middle  portion  of  the  cervix,  which 
normally  is  much  less  responsive  to  this  substance  than  the  vagina,  can  be 
made  more  distinct;  but  the  same  quantity  of  hormone  exerts,  then,  a  still 
stronger  stimulating  effect  on  the  vagina.  In  general,  the  greater  the  amount  of 
hormone  which  is  allowed  to  act,  the  greater  the  proportional  response  of  the 
various  tissues,  this  response  being  always  relatively  greater  in  the  vagina 
than  higher  up,  and  decreasing  the  more  the  nearer  the  tissue  is  to  the  uterus. 
The  reverse  relation  is  noted  in  the  case  of  the  lutein  hormone.  This  exerts  a 
very  strong  effect  on  the  uterus,  which  extends  only  to  the  directly  adjoining 
part  of  the  cervix,  while  in  the  vagina  and  presumably  also  in  the  lower 
portion  of  the  cervix  it  exerts  mainly  an  antagonistic  and  inhibiting  influence 
on  the  follicular  hormone,  thus  favoring  a  resting  condition  in  these  organs, 
which  otherwise  would  be  stimulated  by  the  latter  substance.  The  most  in- 
teresting feature  in  this  connection  is  the  graded  character  of  these  reactions. 
Apparently  we  have  to  deal  with  a  graded  difference  in  the  state  of  sensitiza- 
tion of  these  tissues,  which  either  leads  to  the  binding  of  a  graded  amount  of 
hormone  by  the  various  tissues  and  thus  to  a  gradation  of  the  reactions,  or 
causes  a  difference  in  the  responsiveness  of  the  tissues  after  they  have  com- 
binca  with  the  same  amount  of  hormone.  In  this  case  there  is  thus  a  specificity 
in  the  interactions  of  adjoining  tissues  in  the  same  organism  with  two  hor- 
mones and  a  corresponding  specificity  in  the  structure  of  these  tissues.  We 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       445 

have  therefore  to  deal  directly  with  organ  and  tissue  differential  substances 
and  structures,  and  only  indirectly  with  organismal  differentials,  the  signifi- 
cance of  which  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  in  certain  other  species  these 
tissue  reactions  may  slightly  differ. 

There  is  another  condition  of  morphogenic  character,  in  which  likewise 
quantitative  relations  seem  to  exist  between  hormones  and  specific  activities  of 
tissues ;  namely,  in  the  origin  of  mammary  carcinoma  of  mice.  It  can  be 
shown  that  in  individual  mice  and  in  different  strains  of  mice  there  exists  a 
quantitatively  graded  tendency  to  acquire  carcinoma  of  the  mammary  gland. 
It  can  furthermore  be  shown  that  through  a  quantitatively  graded  diminution 
in  the  activity  of  the  ovarian  hormones,  which  normally  set  in  motion  the 
growth  of  the  mammary  gland,  the  frequency  in  the  development  of  carcinoma 
and  the  intensity  of  the  reaction,  as  measured  by  the  length  of  the  latent  period 
preceding  the  appearance  of  the  tumor,  can  be  reduced  in  a  graded  manner ; 
or  expressed  differently,  the  length  of  the  time  during  which  the  hormone 
must  act  in  order  to  produce  the  carcinoma  varies  in  different  individual  mice 
and  strains  of  mice  and  can  be  altered  experimentally.  There  is  some  evidence 
for  the  conclusion  that  here,  also,  quantitative  differences  in  the  response 
of  the  recipient  tissue,  namely  the  mammary  gland  of  different  individuals, 
depend  upon  different  degrees  of  sensitization  of  the  reacting  tissues  rather 
than  on  differences  in  the  quantities  of  the  hormones  acting  in  different  in- 
dividuals and  strains,  and  that  these  differences  in  the  responsiveness  of  the 
mammary  gland  tissue  determine  the  relative  incidence  of  mammary  gland 
cancer  in  mice. 

It  is  likewise  by  means  of  hormone  action  that  it  has  been  possible  to  dem- 
onstrate the  fact  that  in  different  parts  of  the  body,  differences  exist  in  the 
constitution  of  the  same  type  of  recipient  tissues,  which  morphologically  seem 
to  be  identical,  and  that  therefore  a  much  greater  individualization  of  tissue 
differentials  within  the  same  organism  exists  than  could  have  been  foreseen. 
It  can  be  shown  that  the  action  of  the  corpus  luteum  hormone  on  the  con- 
nective tissue  in  the  mucosa  of  the  genital  tract  of  the  guinea  pig  is  very  selec- 
tive ;  it  is  only  the  connective  tissue  of  the  uterus,  but  not  that  of  the  central 
or  of  the  vaginal  portion  of  the  cervix,  nor  that  of  the  fallopian  tube  and 
vagina,  which  in  the  guinea  pig  responds  to  the  stimulation  of  this  hormone 
with  the  formation  of  decidual  tissue,  and  this  is  true  equally  of  the  tissue  in 
situ,  as  well  as  of  transplanted  tissue.  The  connective  tissue  of  the  uterine 
cervix  responds  to  the  lutein  hormone,  but  with  a  decreased  intensity  as  com- 
pared with  the  response  of  the  uterine  mucosa.  We  may  therefore  conclude 
that  the  chemical  structure  and  function  of  the  ordinary  fibrillar  connective 
tissue  differ  in  adjoining  and  related  organs. 

Even  adjoining  parts  of  the  ordinary  epidermis  of  amphibian  anuran  larvae 
are  differently  constituted,  as  is  shown  in  a  graded  response  to  certain  hor- 
mone-like substances.  Thus  the  skin  covering  the  root  of  the  tail  is  more 
resistant  to  the  injurious  effects  of  substances  which  induce  metamorphosis 
than  the  skin  at  the  tip  of  the  tail,  the  former  behaving  more  like  the  skin  of 
the  trunk  of  the  larva ;  we  shall  refer  again  in  a  later  chapter  to  this  difference 


446  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

in  the  reactions  of  epidermal  tissues.  Another  instance  of  differences  in  the 
constitution  of  an  apparently  homogeneous  tissue  has  already  been  noted; 
it  was  shown  that  different  areas  of  skin  of  amphibian  embryos  exhibited  dif- 
ferent degrees  of  responsiveness  to  the  contact  action  of  the  optic  disc,  some 
areas  possessing,  others  lacking  the  ability  to  form  a  lens. 

In  agreement  with  these  conclusions  is  the  observation  that  fibroblasts  ob- 
tained from  the  connective  tissue  of  different  areas  of  the  embryo  may  behave 
differently  when  cultivated  in  vitro  (R.  C.  Parker).  They  differed  in  their  ra- 
pidity of  growth,  in  the  amount  of  acid  produced,  and  in  their  power  of  resist- 
ance to  injurious  conditions,  and  these  differences  were  permanent  in  certain 
strains  of  fibroblasts  and  seemed  to  be  inherent  in  the  cells.  Not  only  were 
variations  found  in  these  respects  between  periosteal,  perichondral  and  ordi- 
nary connective  tissue  cells,  but  even  between  connective  tissue  cells  taken 
from  the  stroma  of  various  organs.  Although  in  these  cases  we  have  to  deal 
with  lower  organisms  and  with  not  yet  fully  differentiated  embryonal  or 
larval  instead  of  with  adult  tissues,  it  is  evident  from  our  findings  in  the 
uterus  that  in  principle  the  same  condition  holds  good  also  in  the  case  of 
adult  mammalian  organisms. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  the  differentiation  of  tissues  is  in  reality  much 
furthergoing  than  has  been  assumed  on  purely  morphological  grounds.  Fur- 
thermore, the  possibility  must  be  considered  that  the  contact  substances,  and 
in  certain  cases  perhaps  also  the  hormones,  given  off  by  tissues  which  are 
morphologically  indistinguishable  from  one  another,  may  correspondingly 
differ. 

More  recent  studies  of  various  authors  prove  the  still  wider  applicability 
of  this  mode  of  experimental  analysis  of  the  specific  character  of  certain 
tissues  in  embryonal  development,  as  well  as  in  adult  organisms.  By  these 
means  Ritter  and  Blacher  have  studied  the  cause  of  the  differences  in  pig- 
mentation which  are  observed  in  two  races  of  urodele  amphibia,  the  black 
and  white  Axolotl,  and  in  different  areas  of  the  skin  of  the  same  individual 
Axolotl. 

The  white  and  black  races  of  Axolotl  differ  in  the  proportion  of  the  pig- 
mented and  unpigmented  parts  of  their  skin;  in  the  former  the  white,  and 
in  the  latter  the  black  color  predominates.  Now,  it  is  known  that  in  the 
hypophysis  there  is  produced  a  hormone  which  causes  a  black  coloration  of 
amphibian  skin  by  inducing  the  expansion  of  the  chromatophore  pigment  and 
also  by  increasing  the  number  of  these  pigment  cells.  The  question  arose, 
therefore,  as  to  whether  the  inherited  difference  in  the  behavior  of  the  skin 
of  the  white  and  black  Axolotls  might  be  due  to  inherited  differences  in  the 
amount  of  hormone  produced  by  the  pituitary  glands  of  these  two  races,  or 
whether  it  was  due  to  differences  in  the  recipient  skin.  Experiments  by  E. 
Ritter  have  shown  that  the  second  interpretation  is  correct,  no  difference  being 
noticeable  between  the  hypophysis  and  its  pigment-regulating  hormone  of 
the  black  and  the  white  Axolotls.  The  difference  between  these  two  races  con- 
sists not  only  in  the  greater  number  of  pigmented  cells  in  the  black  as  com- 
pared with  the  white  race,  but  also  in  the  reactivity  of  these  two  kinds  of 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       447 

skin.  If  through  extirpation  of  the  pituitary  gland  the  number  of  chromato- 
phores  has  been  diminished,  and  if  subsequently  the  pituitary  hormone  is 
experimentally  again  introduced  into  such  an  animal,  either  through  trans- 
plantation of  hypophyseal  gland  tissue  or  through  injection  of  the  active  sub- 
stance, the  skin  of  the  black  race  responds  more  readily  with  the  new  forma- 
tion of  pigment  cells  than  the  skin  of  the  white  race.  But  under  these  conditions 
injection  of  hormone  or  transplantation  of  hypophyseal  tissues  does  not  en- 
tirely restore  the  normal  characteristics  of  the  skin,  the  number  of  new  pig- 
mented spots  remaining  smaller  in  the  hypophysectomized  than  in  the  normal 
individuals  of  the  black  race  of  Axolotls.  The  essential  point,  however,  is 
that  there  is  no  noticeable  difference  between  the  action  of  hypophysis  of  the 
white  and  of  the  black  race,  both  being  about  equally  effective.  The  dis- 
tinguishing features  in  the  pigmentation  of  these  two  races  depend  upon 
conditions  inherent  in  the  structure  of  the  skin;  after  transplantation  of 
skin  from  the  white  to  the  black  Axolotls,  and  vice  versa,  the  transplants 
retain  their  race  characteristics.  Therefore,  factors  inherent  in  the  substratum 
on  which  the  hormone  acts  primarily  determine  the  pigmentation  of  the  skin. 
On  the  other  hand,  if  through  transplantation  of  an  excess  of  hypophyseal 
tissue  into  an  Axolotl  belonging  to  the  white  race  the  quantity  of  hormone 
action  on  the  substratum  is  much  increased,  then  also  the  skin  of  the  white 
race  can  be  converted  into  black  skin.  The  conclusion  may  then  be  drawn  that 
the  threshold  of  hormone  action  necessary  to  call  forth  production  of  pigment 
cells  is  greater  in  the  white  race  than  in  the  black  race,  and  that  correspond- 
ingly more  hormone  is  needed  in  the  skin  of  the  former  to  obtain  the  same 
amount  of  pigmentation  as  in  the  black  race.  In  this  case  we  have  to  deal 
with  an  example  of  the  second  type  of  specificity,  the  organismal  specificity. 

In  various  classes  of  animals  the  skin  of  the  same  individual  may  be  white 
in  certain  areas,  while  in  others  it  is  black ;  here,  also,  the  coloration  depends 
not  upon  differences  in  the  activity  of  the  hypophysis  but  upon  differences 
inherent  in  the  skin ;  and  again,  the  threshold  in  the  reaction  to  pituitary  hor- 
mone differs  in  the  pigment  cells  in  different  areas  of  the  skin.  Thus  Blacher 
has  shown  that  after  extirpation  of  the  hypophysis  the  pigment  contracts  first 
in  the  chromatophores  of  the  abdominal  skin,  next  in  the  chromatophores  of 
the  tail  and  dorsal  skin,  and  lastly,  in  the  corresponding  cells  in  the  skin  of 
the  head.  As  a  result  of  the  contraction  a  whitening  of  the  skin  takes  place. 
Corresponding  to  this  difference  in  the  reactivity  of  the  chromatophores  is  the 
greater  tendency  of  the  skin  of  the  head  to  be  black,  than  of  the  skin  else- 
where ;  the  same  difference  between  the  different  areas  of  the  skin  is  found  in 
the  black  as  well  as  in  the  white  races ;  also  in  the  latter  the  skin  of  the  head 
has  the  greatest  tendency  to  assume  a  black  color  under  the  influence  of 
the  hypophyseal  hormone.  While  thus  the  differences  in  the  behavior  of 
pigment  cells  in  different  areas  of  the  body  are  of  the  same  type  in  the 
white  and  black  races,  the  threshold  of  hormone  action  necessary  to  cause 
expansion  of  the  pigment  and  call  forth  a  new  formation  of  chromatophores 
differs  in  the  two  races. 

Blacher  and  Ritter  assume  that  the  differences  in  the  reaction  of  these  cells 


448  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

depend  upon  different  threshold  reactions  of  the  pigment  cells  to  the  hor- 
mone, the  amount  of  hormone  needed  in  order  to  obtain  an  effect  being  differ- 
ent in  the  pigment  cells  in  different  races,  as  well  as  in  different  areas  within 
the  same  individual.  There  remains,  however,  the  possibility  that  different 
cells  may  vary  primarily  in  their  ability  to  attract  and  to  bind  a  certain  amount 
of  the  hormone,  rather  than  in  the  amounts  necessary  to  call  forth  a  reaction. 
As  to  the  causes  of  the  differences  in  the  behavior  of  these  different  types  of 
cells,  nothing  definite  is  known,  but  it  may  be  suggested  that  a  substance  is 
produced  within  the  cell  which  increases  the  sensitiveness  of  the  latter  to  the 
hormone,  a  condition  analogous  to  the  sensitization  to  mechanical  stimuli 
which  is  produced  in  the  uterine  mucosa  by  the  lutein  hormone. 

We  see,  then,  that  the  same  mechanism  applies  to  a  condition  of  pure 
organ-  or  tissue-specificity,  and  to  a  condition  of  combined  organismal-  and 
tissue-specificity. 

Analogous  are  certain  findings  in  adult  mammals.  Here  in  women  past  the 
menopause  the  ovary  no  longer  reacts  to  the  stimulating  action  of  pituitary 
gonadotropic  hormones  with  maturation  of  follicles  and  corpus  luteum  for- 
mation, although  the  human  anterior  hypophysis  is  still  potent  (Saxton  and 
Loeb)  ;  the  lack  of  ovarian  responsiveness  must,  in  such  instances,  be  due 
to  changes  which  have  taken  place  in  the  recipient  organ,  the  ovary. 

In  mammals  differences  in  the  reaction  of  analogous  organs  to  the  same 
kind  of  hormones  have  been  observed  in  different  species.  Thus,  for  instance, 
the  ovary  of  the  guinea  pig,  rat  and  rabbit  react  quite  differently  to  the  same 
gonadotropic  hormones  of  the  pituitary  gland  and  to  changes  in  the  constitu- 
tion of  hormones  which  follow  hysterectomy.  These  differences  depend  on 
the  structure  of  the  ovaries  in  these  species  and  in  particular  on  the  power 
of  resistance  of  follicles  and  corpora  lutea  to  injurious  conditions  and  on  the 
ability  of  the  theca  interna  to  undergo  luteinization.  In  these  instances  we 
have  to  deal  with  organismal  specificities  in  the  reaction  of  tissues  to  the 
same  kind  of  hormones. 

A  similar  problem  as  to  the  relative  significance  of  substratum  and  stimulus 
in  determining  the  specificity  of  the  reaction  arises  in  the  field  of  regeneration. 
Triton  is  able  to  regenerate  tail  as  well  as  anterior  and  posterior  extremities ; 
anuran  amphibia,  such  as  toads,  do  not  possess  this  regenerative  power.  In 
the  lizard  the  condition  is  intermediate;  the  tail  is  able  to  regenerate,  while 
the  posterior  extremities  regenerate  only  in  a  rudimentary  way,  and  the 
anterior  extremities  not  at  all.  Weiss  transplanted  in  Triton  the  regenerative 
bud  from  a  tail  to  a  cut  surface  in  the  anterior  extremity,  a  piece  of  which 
had  previously  been  excised.  It  seemed  that  the  grafted  tail  material  became 
transformed  into  a  leg  under  the  influence  of  the  leg  stump,  which  thus  acted 
as  an  organizer  and  caused  the  transformation  of  potential  tail  material  into 
a  limb.  In  this  case  evidently  the  stimulating  tissue  and  not  the  recipient  tissue 
determined  the  fate  of  the  tail  bud.  However,  when  a  similar  experiment  was 
carried  out  in  the  lizard,  where  the  tail  still  has  the  power  to  regenerate  but 
the  anterior  extremity  lacks  it,  the  transplanted  tail  bud  was  not  transformed 
into  a  leg,  because  the  wound  surface  of  the  limb  to  which  it  was  attached 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       449 

was  not  able  to  restitute  lost  parts.  Weiss  concludes  therefore  that  the  leg  has 
lost  the  ability  to  act  as  an  organizer.  However,  the  interpretation  of  these 
experiments  suffers  from  the  difficulty  that  there  is  some  uncertainty  as  to 
whether,  in  Triton,  a  real  transformation  of  the  grafted  tail  into  leg  took 
place,  or  whether,  instead,  a  regeneration  may  not  have  proceeded  from 
the  remaining  stump  of  the  limb. 

On  the  other  hand,  Guyenot  had  shown  previously  that  if,  following 
metamorphosis,  an  extremity  of  Bufo  vulgaris,  which  no  longer  possesses  the 
ability  to  regenerate  lost  parts,  is  grafted  to  a  larva  of  Salamandra  maculosa, 
which  latter  is  able  to  regenerate  extremities,  the  transplant  heals  in  but  has 
not  gained  thereby  the  power  to  regenerate  lost  parts  when  a  portion  of  the 
transplanted  limb  is  amputated.  This  indicates  that  the  lack  of  regeneration 
depends  upon  conditions  inherent  in  the  transplanted  Bufo  tissue,  and  that 
the  presence  in  Salamander  of  substances  able  to  stimulate  the  growth  of  a 
leg,  if  such  substances  should  exist,  is  of  no  avail.  In  these  instances  we  have 
to  deal  with  examples  of  organ  rather  than  of  organismal  specificity. 

Axolotl  does  not  possess  a  balancer,  while  Triton  does  have  this  organ. 
But  notwithstanding  the  lack  of  a  balancer  in  Axolotl,  the  medullary  plate  of 
this  species  contains  an  inductor  substance  able  to  cause  the  formation  of  this 
structure  in  the  kind  of  tissue  which  has  the  potentiality  to  produce  this  organ. 
Therefore,  if  the  anterior  portion  of  the  medullary  plate  is  transplanted  from 
Axolotl  to  a  later  gastrula,  or  to  an  early  neurula  stage  of  Triton,  the  trans- 
plant may  induce  in  the  host  epidermis  the  formation  of  a  balancer,  while 
this  effect  is  lacking  if  the  medullary  plate  is  in  contact  with  the  Amblystoma 
epidermis.  The  reason  then  why  Amblystoma  does  not  possess  a  balancer  is 
not  due  to  the  lack  of  the  proper  stimulus,  but  to  the  inability  of  the  tissue  to 
respond  to  such  a  stimulus  in  an  adequate  manner. 

The  analogy  between  this  condition  and  the  findings  of  Schotte,  to  which 
we  have  referred  in  a  preceding  chapter,  is  evident.  After  transplantation 
of  Rana  tissue  to  Triton  the  oral  region  of  the  host  supplied  an  organizer 
substance,  which  induced  the  formation  of  mouth  organs  in  the  transplant ;  but 
the  potentiality  of  the  transplanted  tissue  itself  determined  the  specific  kind  of 
mouth  organs  which  actually  developed  under  the  influence  of  the  inductor 
tissue.  In  both  of  these  cases  we  have  to  deal  with  examples  of  organismal 
specificities  inherent  in  the  reacting  tissues,  whereas  the  organizer  substance 
does  not  manifest  an  organismal  specificity. 

There  exist,  however,  conditions  in  which  the  lack  of  reaction  is  due  not 
to  the  specificity  of  the  recipient  tissue  but  to  the  lack  of  a  hormone.  Thus 
Wigglesworth,  Piepho,  and  others,  have  demonstrated  that  in  the  larvae  of 
insects  changes  leading  to  pupation  are  induced  by  a  hormone  which  is  local- 
ized in  certain  parts  of  the  brain — or  rather  in  the  ring  gland  situated  be- 
tween the  hemispheres  of  the  larval  brain  (Hadorn  and  Bodenstein) — and 
which  may  circulate  also  in  the  bodyfluids.  Now,  it  can  be  shown  that  changes 
characteristic  of  the  pupa  may  be  induced  even  in  the  skin  of  the  imago  if  the 
larval  pupation  hormone  is  supplied.  This  hormone  does  not  possess  finer 
organismal  differentials  and  presumably  lacks  them  altogether;  therefore  it 


450  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

may  be  active  also  in  distantly  related  species  of  insects.  However,  while  in 
this  case  the  skin  of  the  distantly  related  imago,  if  properly  stimulated,  still 
possesses  the  ability  to  produce  a  cuticula,  which  ordinarily  is  produced  only 
by  the  larva,  the  kind  of  changes  which  take  place  in  the  skin  under  the  in- 
fluence of  this  hormone,  the  structure  and  pigmentation  of  the  newly  formed 
cuticula,  possess  the  characteristics  of  the  imago  skin.  The  modifiability  of 
this  tissue  under  the  influence  of  a  specific  hormone,  obtained  from  a  distant 
species,  is  therefore  restricted.  However,  if  the  skin  of  the  imago  undergoes 
regeneration,  its  potentiality  to  react  like  larval  skin  is  restored  to  it  and 
now  the  typical  changes  in  the  cuticula  may  be  produced  by  the  hormone. 

Similarly,  Piepho  has  shown  that  a  larval  hormone  may  induce  the  normal 
skin  of  a  pupa  to  form  the  cuticula  characteristic  of  the  pupa,  while  regenerat- 
ing skin  regains  the  ability  to  produce  larval  cuticula.  In  the  latter  instance 
the  initiation  of  growth  processes  in  the  skin  enlarges  the  range  of  reactivity 
of  this  tissue  to  specific  hormones ;  when  it  has  reached  a  more  advanced 
stage  of  regeneration  it  behaves  like  tissues  of  earlier  embryonal  stages,  which 
are  as  yet  less  differentiated;  it  returns  to  a  more  plastic  condition  in  which 
the  equilibrium  is  more  labile  and  in  which  certain  changes  in  the  inner  or 
outer  environment  may  cause  fargoing  transformations.  But  it  seems  that 
the  effects  of  regeneration  in  increasing  the  range  of  reactivity  of  tissues  de- 
creases with  increasing  phylogenetic  evolution,  being  much  less  in  mammals 
than  in  invertebrates.  We  have  seen  that  the  very  plastic  material  of  phylo- 
genetically  primitive  organisms,  such  as  planarians,  reacts  readily  to  environ- 
mental changes  with  modifications  of  organs,  whereas  the  reestablishment 
of  the  original  set  of  environmental  conditions  may  lead  again  to  the  restora- 
tion of  the  original  tissue  structures  and  tissue  equilibrium,  as  the  recent 
experiments  of  Child  have  shown.  In  the  very  primitive  and  very  plastic 
material  of  certain  coelenterates  the  tissue  equilibrium  may  be  determined 
by  a  set  of  relatively  simple  conditions  in  which  mechanical  factors  and 
oxygen  supply  (Barth)  may  play  a  significant  role. 

Also,  in  the  early  ontogenetic  stages  the  as  yet  less  differentiated  tissue 
may  react  to  stimulation  by  specific  hormones  with  tissue  changes  which 
correspond  more  to  the  specificity  of  the  hormone  than  of  the  tissue.  Thus 
in  sufficiently  early  embryonal  stages  of  birds  (Willier)  and  mammals  (Ivy) 
male  and  female  sex  hormones  can  determine  in  which  direction,  female  or 
male,  the  sex  glands  of  the  embryo  shall  develop. 

In  our  experiments  on  the  production  of  maternal  placenta  and  placentoma 
in  the  uterus  of  the  guinea  pig,  we  analyzed  by  means  of  transplantation  of 
pieces  of  uterus,  the  interaction  between  certain  morphogenic  distance  sub- 
stances and  organismal  differentials.  We  found  that  the  formation  of 
placentomata  depended  upon  the  amount  of  lutein  substance  which  has  had  a 
chance  to  act  on  the  uterus  previous  to,  as  well  as  following  transplantation, 
and  action  at  both  these  periods  was  necessary  in  order  to  obtain  the  develop- 
ment of  large-sized  placentomata.  There  entered  into  these  reactions,  further- 
more, a  mechanical,  stimulating  factor,  which  was  introduced  during  the 
process  of  transplantation.  But  in  addition  the  effect  depended  also  upon 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       451 

the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  transplant,  the  transplant  showing  a 
marked  sensitiveness  to  the  injurious  action  of  homoiotoxins.  In  this  case 
the  morphogenic  substance,  the  lutein  hormone,  does  not  bear  an  organismal 
differential  and  the  injurious  action  of  the  homoiotoxin  is  due  to  the  sensitive- 
ness of  the  tissue  on  which  the  hormone  acts. 

Somewhat  related  conditions  were  found  in  the  compensatory  hyper- 
trophy of  the  thyroid  gland,  a  process  which  in  all  probability  is  caused  by  a 
change  in  the  normal  balance  between  the  thyroid-stimulating  hormone  of  the 
anterior  hypophysis  and  thyroxin,  the  hormone  of  the  thyroid  gland,  the  for- 
mer inducing,  the  latter  inhibiting  hypertrophy.  If  we  diminish  the  quantity  of 
the  thyroid  hormone  by  extirpating  a  part  of  the  gland  which  produces  it, 
hypertrophy  takes  place;  if  we  increase  the  quantity  of  thyroid  hormone, 
hypertrophy  is  prevented.  Although  these  hormones  do  not  carry  homoiodif- 
ferentials,  still,  homoiotransplantation  of  thyroid  tissue  interferes  with  the 
development  of  hypertrophy,  because  the  homoiotoxins  have  an  unfavorable 
effect  on  the  graft. 

Similar  problems  arise  in  the  analysis  of  the  factors  underlying  meta- 
morphosis. How  far  do  the  conditions  initiating  metamorphosis  reside  in  the 
tissues  and  depend  upon  the  organ  and  organismal  differentials  of  the  latter, 
and  how  far  are  they  due  to  the  action  of  stimulating  or  regulating  substances 
circulating  in  the  bodyfluids  and  comparable  to  hormones  ?  It  is  again  largely 
by  means  of  transplantation  experiments  that  the  analysis  of  metamorphosis 
has  been  carried  out.  In  his  early  experiments  of  joining  together  parts  of 
frog  larvae,  Born  had  observed  that  the  two  partial  larvae,  when  they  were 
combined,  metamorphosed  at  the  same  time,  irrespective  of  the  state  of  nour- 
ishment of  the  two  partners;  this  may  be  taken  as  an  indication  that  one 
partner  influenced  the  time  of  metamorphosis  of  the  other.  Such  an  influence 
was  also  noticeable  in  the  more  recent  experiments  of  Burns,  who  accom- 
plished a  union  between  larvae  of  Amblystoma  tigrinum,  which  normally 
metamorphose  very  slowly,  and  those  of  Amblystoma  punctatum,  which 
metamorphose  more  rapidly;  under  these  conditions  Amblystoma  punctatum 
caused  a  definite  acceleration  of  the  metamorphosis  of  the  tigrinum  larva. 

A  furthergoing  analysis  of  the  factors  underlying  metamorphosis  has  been 
accomplished  through  transplantation  of  pieces  of  amphibian  skin  and  of  the 
iris  of  the  eye,  in  which,  normally,  characteristic  color  changes  take  place 
during  metamorphosis.  In  this  way  it  has  been  possible,  within  certain  limits, 
to  determine  how  far  organismal  differentials  influence  these  processes,  and 
in  particular,  whether  an  interaction  takes  place  between  the  factors  determin- 
ing metamorphosis  and  the  homoio-  and  heterotoxins  which  may  act  on  the 
grafted  tissues.  From  the  older  experiments  of  Uhlenhuth  on  the  eye,  of 
Weigl  on  skin,  of  Kornfeld  on  the  gills  of  urodeles,  and  from  the  more 
recent  experiments  of  Lindemann  on  the  skin  of  frog  larvae,  we  may,  in 
general,  draw  the  conclusion  that  a  chemical  factor,  a  substance  circulating 
in  the  bodyfluids  of  an  amphibian,  initiates  metamorphosis  synchronously  in 
all  the  tissues  which  are  sensitive  to  the  effect  of  such  a  substance  and  which 
are  subject  to  metamorphosis.  Furthermore,  this  substance  is  able  to  act  not 


452  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

only  on  the  tissues  of  the  same  individual,  but  also  on  tissues  transplanted 
from  another  individual  of  the  same,  or  even  of  a  different  species ;  if  it  is 
present  at  the  time  just  preceding  transplantation  in  a  larger  quantity  in  the 
host  than  in  the  donor,  the  metamorphosis  of  the  transplant  tends  to  be  ac- 
celerated ;  but  if  present  in  a  larger  quantity  in  the  donor  than  in  the  host, 
then  a  relative  retardation  in  the  metamorphosis  of  the  transplant,  as  compared 
with  the  metamorphosis  which  would  have  taken  place  in  the  donor,  is  apt  to 
occur. 

However,  in  addition  to  these  factors,  others  which  are  present  in  the 
transplant  influence  the  character  and  time  of  metamorphosis.  Among  these 
latter,  primary  factors  inherent  in  the  structure  of  the  tissues,  and  secondary 
ones  depending  on  variable  environmental  conditions,  can  be  distinguished. 
Thus,  the  iris  of  the  eye  in  salamander  and  also  the  gills  in  urodeles  undergo 
certain  changes  apparently  under  the  influence  of  specific  substances,  which 
become  potent  some  time  previous  to  the  onset  of  metamorphosis,  but  the 
mode  of  action  is  influenced  by  specific  characteristics  of  the  tissues.  Even 
skin  from  different  surface  areas  of  the  same  animal  may  differ  as  to  its 
reactivity  to  these  substances.  According  to  Lindemann,  the  skin  of  the  tail 
of  frog  larvae  will  undergo  absorption  during  metamorphosis,  and  this  takes 
place  irrespective  of  whether  the  skin  has  been  left  in  its  normal  place  or 
whether  it  has  been  transplanted  into  other  parts  of  the  body  surface.  On  the 
other  hand,  dorsal  skin  will  remain  unchanged,  even  if  transplanted  into  a 
place  which  undergoes  retrogressive  changes  during  metamorphosis.  The  con- 
dition of  the  tissues  of  the  donor  may  modify  the  metamorphosis  in  still  an- 
other way :  if  the  donor  organism  at  the  time  of  transplantation  has  reached 
a  stage  nearer  to  metamorphosis  than  the  host,  the  transplant  has  a  tendency 
to  metamorphose  at  an  earlier  date  than  the  host;  if,  on  the  contrary,  the 
donor  is  still  farther  removed  from  the  stage  of  metamorphosis,  the  trans- 
plant tends  to  require  a  longer  time  before  metamorphosis  can  take  place.  It 
seems  therefore  that  preceding  the  processes  occurring  during  metamorphosis 
there  are  preliminary  changes  in  the  tissues,  which  make  the  latter  more  re- 
sponsive and  gradually  sensitize  it  to  the  substances  causing  metamorphosis, 
and  this  process  of  sensitization  requires  a  certain  time.  It  is  possible  that  the 
sensitizing  substance  is  identical  with  the  metamorphosis-inducing  substance. 
We  may  then  assume  that  this  substance  gradually  accumulates  in  the  organ- 
ism, combines  with  the  responsive  tissues  and  thereby  makes  them  ready  for 
metamorphosis,  which  takes  place  after  a  certain  point  of  tissue  saturation  has 
been  reached  and  after  the  hormone  has  had  a  chance  to  act  on  the  tissues  for 
a  sufficient  length  of  time.  The  possibility  also  exists  that  the  sensitizing  sub- 
stance differs  from  the  metamorphosing  substance  and  merely  makes  the  tis- 
sues receptive  to  the  action  of  the  latter  substance.  However  that  may  be, 
a  tissue  thus  sufficiently  prepared  undergoes  metamorphosis  after  transplanta- 
tion, even  without  the  presence  of  the  active  metamorphosing  substance  in 
the  host,  whereas  a  tissue  not  fully  prepared  or  sensitized  is  not  sufficiently 
responsive  even  if  the  metamorphosing  substance  of  the  host  is  fully  active. 
Such  a  transplant  will,  therefore,  not  metamorphose  synchronously  with  the 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       453 

host  organism,  but  at  an  earlier  or  later  date,  in  accordance  with  its  sufficient 
or  insufficient  sensitization.  Yet,  within  a  certain  range  of  sensitization  the 
hormone  active  in  the  host  at  the  time  of  metamorphosis  tends  to  induce 
metamorphosis  in  the  transplant  synchronously  with  that  of  the  host  tissues. 

As  to  the  significance  of  organismal  differentials  in  the  process  of  meta- 
morphosis, in  urodele  amphibia  the  effects  described  can  be  noted  after  auto- 
and  homoio-,  as  well  as  after  heterotransplantation  of  the  respective  tissues, 
but  in  anuran  amphibia  W.  Schultz  observed  that  only  auto-,  but  not  homoio- 
transplanted  skin  takes  part  in  metamorphosis.  With  the  progress  in  phylo- 
genetic  development,  the  tissues  become  more  and  more  specialized  and  the 
organismal  differentials  more  selective,  so  that  only  if  the  latter  are  nearly 
related  in  the  host  and  the  transplant  is  the  metabolism  of  the  transplanted 
tissue  such  that  the  graft  is  able  to  respond  effectively  to  the  metamorphosing 
substances. 

In  the  experiments  cited  in  this  chapter  certain  tissue  reactions  may  depend 
upon  the  interaction  between  several  sets  of  factors:  namely,  (a)  conditions 
inherent  in  the  tissues  and  determining  their  ability  to  undergo  certain 
changes ;  (b)  the  action  of  hormone-like  distance  substances  circulating  in 
the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  combining  with  the  transplanted  tissues  and  thus 
causing  their  specific  effects;  (c)  the  time  when  these  hormone-like  sub- 
stances act  on  the  tissues.  In  some  cases  substances  of  this  kind  must  act 
not  only  following  but  also  previous  to  transplantation,  and  thus  sensitize  the 
tissues;  (d)  the  action  of  organismal  differentials  affecting,  as  a  rule,  the 
transplanted  tissues  and,  much  less  or  not  at  all,  the  hormone-like  substances, 
although  in  some  cases  hormones  may  possess  some  of  the  less  specific  or- 
ganismal differentials  ;  (e)  mechanical  factors  acting  as  stimuli  in  combination 
with  sensitizing  agents;  as  in  the  formation  of  maternal  placentomata ;  (f) 
a  balancing  action  between  conditions  inherent  in  the  tissues  and  the  effects 
of  the  hormone-like  distance  substances. 

A  balancing  action,  similar  to  the  last  mentioned  factor,  may  take  place  in 
ordinary  transplantation  of  tissues.  In  this  case  we  have  in  all  probability  to 
deal  with  an  antagonism  between  factors  inherent  in  the  transplant  and  con- 
tact substances  residing  in  the  tissues  of  the  host  which  serve  as  a  soil  for 
the  transplant.  Thus  in  the  experiments  of  Milojevitch,  with  transplantation 
of  regenerative  buds  of  extremities,  the  surrounding  host  tissues  apparently 
determined  what  kind  of  limb  was  to  develop,  their  influence  dominating  over 
the  conditions  inherent  in  the  transplants ;  on  the  contrary,  in  the  experiments 
of  Ruud,  with  transplantation  of  embryonal  limb  buds,  factors  inherent  in  the 
transplants  determined  the  result. 

In  this  connection  we  may  also  refer  to  Goldschmidt's  theory  of  the 
mechanisms  underlying  Mendelian  heredity,  and  in  particular  to  his  interpreta- 
tion of  the  sex-intergrades  which  result  from  hybridization  of  different  races 
of  Lymantria.  In  the  various  types  of  hybridizations  there  takes  place  a 
mutual  interaction  of  germ  cells  possessing  different  genetic  constitutions  and 
therefore  also  different  precursors  of  organismal  differentials.  Goldschmidt 
attributes  different  potencies  to  various  allelomorph  genes  or  gene  combina- 


454  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

tions  in  the  fertilized  ovum.  The  greater  the  potency,  the  greater  and  the 
more  rapidly  reached  will  be  that  amount  of  a  hormone-like  substance  suffi- 
cient to  direct  the  development  of  the  egg  into  certain  channels.  The  earlier 
the  threshold  is  reached  at  which  this  substance  becomes  active,  the  earlier 
and  more  extensive  will  be  its  influence  on  the  embryonal  development  and 
the  more  fundamental  will  be  the  changes  produced,  while  a  substance  devel- 
oping late  and  in  small  quantities  will  affect  only  the  latest  phases  of  embryonal 
development  and  its  action  therefore  will  be  less  far  reaching.  Hence,  the 
effect  of  such  a  substance  depends  upon  its  potency,  quantity,  and  time  of 
appearance,  and  also  upon  the  character  of  the  substratum  on  which  it  acts 
and  on  the  intensity  and  rapidity  of  the  processes  which  it  influences.  In  a 
preceding  chapter  it  has  been  pointed  out  that  the  time-factor  plays  a  role 
also  in  the  interaction  between  organizer  and  recipient  tissues  and  that  these 
time-relations  may  differ  in  the  case  of  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous 
tissues.  In  heterotransplantation,  therefore,  incompatibilities  may  develop 
between  the  action  of  the  organizer  contained  in  the  transplant  and  in  the 
recipient  tissues  in  the  host,  or  vice  versa.  There  is,  here,  an  additional 
interesting  analogy  between  the  processes  of  fertilization  and  transplantation. 

In  a  somewhat  similar  manner,  according  to  F.  R.  Lillie,  the  gynandro- 
morphism  which  is  occasionally  found  in  birds  depends  upon  certain  quanti- 
tative variations  in  the  interaction  between  factors  residing  in  the  tissues  and 
the  hormone  acting  upon  the  latter.  In  gynandromorphic  individuals  one  side 
of  the  animal  has  male  and  the  other  side  female  plumage,  and  at  the  same 
time  the  quantity  of  the  female  sex  hormone  which  is  produced  by  the 
ovary  is  diminished.  Lillie  assumes  that  the  female  sex  hormone,  under  these 
conditions,  is  able  to  impress  upon  the  feathers  the  female  characteristics 
only  if  the  growth  rate  of  the  feathers  during  their  development  is  sufficiently 
slow  to  allow  the  female  sex  hormone  to  become  effective,  otherwise  the 
feathers  assume  the  male  characteristics.  Lillie  observed  also  that  the  side  on 
which  the  male  feathers  developed  in  some  birds  was  often  hypertrophic, 
and  he  assumes  therefore  that  the  rate  of  growth  was  too  rapid  on  this  side 
to  give  the  female  sex  hormone  a  chance  to  endow  these  feathers  with 
female  characteristics.  Thus  they  remained  male  on  the  hypertrophied  side, 
since  here  the  threshold  of  reaction  for  the  female  sex  hormone  would  need 
to  be  higher  on  account  of  the  more  rapid  tissue  growth.  In  this  case  there 
would  be  an  interaction  between  intrinsic  and  external  factors,  the  latter 
being  represented  by  hormones  which,  in  combination  with  the  inherent 
properties  of  the  recipient  tissue,  determine  the  character  of  the  developing 
plumage. 

Cell  and  tissue  differentiation  and  loss  of  differentiation  (dedifferentiation), 
as  well  as  metaplasia,  present  the  problem  as  to  how  far  factors  inherent  in 
the  tissues  and  how  far  environmental  factors,  including  the  inner  environ- 
ment, and,  in  particular,  contact  substances  and  hormones,  play  a  role  in 
these  processes.  There  is  a  strong  indication  that  as  a  rule  both  intrinsic  and 
environmental  factors  are  active,  but  in  varying  proportions  in  different 
areas,  and  that  with  advancing  development  the   intrinsic   factors  of   the 


SUBSTRATUM  AND  MORPHOGENIC  SUBSTANCES       455 

substratum  begin  to  predominate  more  and  more  over  the  environmental 
stimulating  factors,  although  some  general  conditions,  such  as  the  action  of 
more  specific  hormone-like  substances  and  the  state  of  nourishment  and 
oxygen  supply,  remain  of  importance.  In  regard  to  the  latter  factors,  the 
degree  of  differentiation  may  depend,  in  some  instances,  upon  the  influence 
which  relatively  unfavorable  conditions  of  nourishment  exert  on  the  tissues. 
To  cite  an  example :  there  can  be  little  doubt  that  the  keratinization  of  the 
epidermis  is  due  to  the  distance  of  epidermal  cells,  undergoing  this  change, 
from  the  capillaries,  a  distance  which  increases  in  proportion  to  the  intensity 
of  proliferation  of  these  cells.  The  same  factors  may  also  affect  the  rapidity 
and  character  of  cell  division ;  a  certain  degree  of  unfavorableness  in  a 
constellation  of  factors  may  act  as  a  stimulus,  initiating  cell  division,  but  at 
the  same  time  the  unfavorable  conditions  may  make  the  cell  division  thus 
induced  irregular.  On  the  other  hand,  conditions  which  induce  rapid  normal 
cell  division  may  thereby  inhibit  a  complete  differentiation  of  the  resulting 
tissues. 

Experimental  analysis  of  tissues  by  the  use  of  hormones,  as  well  as  by 
other  means,  has  made  it  possible  to  establish  the  existence  of  a  much  greater 
differentiation  and  individualization  of , tissues  in  different  areas  than  had 
previously  been  assumed  to  exist,  when  observation  of  the  structure  of 
tissues  seemed  to  indicate  their  identity.  Furthermore,  the  characteristics  of 
tissues  and  organs  of  an  organism  are  determined  by  factors  inherent  in  the 
recipient  tissues  as  well  as  by  stimuli  acting  on  them.  While  in  different  cases 
the  relative  importance  of  these  two  sets  of  factors  varies,  in  many  instances 
the  former  preponderate.  This  is  true  at  least  when  the  more  differentiated, 
phylogenetically  and  ontogenetically  mature  stages  have  been  reached,  while 
in  the  more  primitive  stages  the  stimulating  and  transforming  effects  of 
contact  and  distance  hormone-like  substances  play  a  prominent  role. 

There  must  be  added  to  these  morphogenic  substances,  certain  vitamins 
which  also  can  be  shown  to  have  specific  morphogenic  effects  under  some 
conditions ;  this  holds  good,  for  instance,  in  the  case  of  vitamin  A,  the 
absence  of  which  may  produce  a  transformation  of  cylindrical  into  squamous 
epithelium  in  some  epithelial  membranes ;  also  of  vitamin  D,  which  affects  in 
a  specific  manner  the  bony  structures.  With  furthergoing  phylogenetic  and 
ontogenetic  development  certain  tissue  differentiations  take  place,  requiring 
the  presence  of  definite  vitamins  for  the  maintenance  of  normal  structure 
and  function. 

The  problem  which  we  have  discussed  in  this  chapter  is  a  part  of  the 
wider  problem  as  to  the  relative  significance  of  living  substratum  and 
environment  in  the  development  and  function  of  living  matter,  whether  of 
individuals,  species,  or  wider  classes  of  organisms.  The  tissues  which  are  the 
bearers  of  the  organismal  and  the  organ  and  tissue  differentials  and  their 
precursors  represent  the  substratum,  and  in  this  substratum  the  organismal 
differentials  and  their  precursors  are  the  most  constant  constituents,  while 
the  organ  differentials  seem  to  be  more  modifiable;  the  contact  substances 
and  hormones  represent  a  part  of  the  inner  environment,  which  however,  can 


456  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

be  experimentally  introduced  also  from  the  outside.  In  all  the  cases  discussed 
we  notice  the  relative  preponderance  of  the  character  of  the  substratum  over 
the  environmental  factors.  Nevertheless,  in  the  course  of  investigation,  it  has 
been  found  in  many  cases  that  what  had  hitherto  been  assumed  to  be  deter- 
mined solely  by  conditions  inherent  in  the  substratum,  is  determined  in  part 
also  by  environmental  factors,  the  latter  thus  growing  in  importance.  The 
further  extension  of  the  conscious  control  of  life  processes  depends  on  the 
discovery  of  additional  extrinsic  factors  influencing  tissue  reactions,  and  the 
possibility  of  modifying  these  experimentally. 


Chapter  2 

Structure  and  Function  of  Organs  and  Tissues 
as  Criteria  of  Individuality 

Our  recognition  of  and  distinction  between  different  human  indi- 
|  viduals  depends  on  many  factors,  particularly  on  their  facial  features, 
the  color  of  hair  and  eyes,  the  height  and  outlines  of  their  bodies,  the 
character  of  their  movements,  especially  their  way  of  walking,  the  quality  of 
their  voices  and  modes  of  speech,  thinking  and  feeling,  in  general  on  their 
reactions  under  varying  conditions.  By  these  means  we  can  distinguish  be- 
tween individuals  and  we  conclude  that  no  two  persons  whom  we  meet  are 
exactly  alike ;  this  holds  good  even  of  identical  twins.  But  a  certain  experience 
is  necessary  in  the  use  of  these  different  signs.  We  can  best  differentiate 
individuals  who,  in  the  most  essential  features,  are  similar  to  those  we  meet 
daily  in  the  greatest  number,  and  we  have  more  difficulty  in  differentiating 
between  classes  of  individuals  with  which  we  are  less  well  acquainted ;  for 
instance,  it  is  more  difficult  for  most  of  us  to  distinguish  between  individual 
monkeys  and  dogs,  than  between  human  beings,  although  persons  who  are 
studying  monkeys  and  dogs  very  closely  can,  here,  also  quite  readily  distin- 
guish different  individuals.  We  use  the  combination  of  a  large  number  of 
organ  and  tissue  peculiarities  and  the  general  body  build  as  distinguishing 
marks  between  individuals,  each  individual  thus  representing  to  us  a  mosaic, 
which,  as  a  rule,  leaves  in  us  a  composite  impression  rather  than  a  memory  of 
the  separate  elements  constituting  the  mosaic.  These  separate  features  are 
determined  largely  by  inheritance,  although  variable  environmental  factors 
may  greatly  influence  their  ultimate  character,  and  different  kinds  of  charac- 
teristics are  unequally  affected  by  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  individual 
and  by  environmental  factors,  the  experiences  through  which  the  individual 
has  passed. 

We  shall  discuss  here,  in  particular,  two  characteristic  features  which 
distinguish  human  individuals  and  which  are  especially  striking  as  to  their 
fineness  of  individualization,  namely,  the  skin  patterns,  which  are  employed 
for  the  identification  of  individuals,  and  the  scents  which  dogs  use  in  tracing 
the  movements  of  and  in  recognizing  individuals. 

I.  The  palmar  and  plantar  skin  patterns  as  criteria  of  individuality.  The 
patterns  due  to  the  arrangements  of  the  ridges  in  the  skin  of  the  palms  of 
the  hand  and  the  plantar  surfaces  of  the  foot  differ,  but  are  constant  in  each 
individual;  in  the  form  of  finger  prints  they  are  used  to  distinguish  indi- 
viduals from  one  another.  These  peculiarities  are  distinct  from  the  indi- 
viduality differential,  inasmuch  as  they  are  limited  to  one  particular  organ 
and  do  not  represent  a  characteristic  shared  by  all  or  the  majority  of  the 
organs  or  tissues  of  the  body.  In  this  respect  they  resemble  therefore  other 

457 


458  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individual  peculiarities,  such  as  the  color  of  hair  and  of  iris,  the  cephalic 
index,  or  similar  characteristics,  which,  all  combined,  represent  the  mosaic 
structure  of  the  organism,  in  contrast  to  the  essential  individuality,  which  is 
based  on  the  organismal  differentials.  However,  while  many  persons  have 
brown  hair  or  blue  eyes,  the  pattern  of  the  skin  ridges,  as  stated,  is  specific 
in  every  individual.  The  ridge  patterns  of  the  skin,  together  with  other  mosaic 
characters,  differ  as  to  the  frequency  with  which  certain  peculiarities  are 
present  in  different  races,  the  difference  between  races  being,  therefore, 
largely  statistical,  the  same  structural  elements  as  a  rule  occurring  in  all  of 
them.  The  papillary  skin  patterns  have  this  statistical  characteristic  in 
common  also  with  the  factors  on  which  blood  grouping  depends,  certain 
blood  groups  being  found  more  often  in  some  races  than  in  others.  But,  like 
the  individuality  differentials,  the  skin  patterns  represent  individual  character- 
istics, while  the  features  distinguishing  the  four  original  blood  groups  do  not, 
to  the  same  degree,  allow  the  differentiation  of  individuals;  they  represent 
group  characters,  as  their  name  implies. 

In  the  case  of  monkeys,  the  parts  of  the  skin  where  these  ridges  are  found 
serve  as  instruments  with  which  to  hold  fast  to  trunks  of  trees  and  other 
objects  of  a  similar  character,  and  those  types  of  ridges  which  may  be  of  use 
in  this  function  have  been  designated  as  "friction  ridges."  According  to  the 
description  given  by  Wilder  and  Wentworth,  the  ridges  run,  in  general,  in  an 
approximately  parallel  direction  over  the  greater  part  of  the  friction  skin, 
more  or  less  across  the  longitudinal  axes  of  hand  and  foot,  but  in  certain 
definite  places  where  the  surface  rises  slightly,  to  come  into  fuller  contact 
with  external  objects,  there  occur  some  departures  from  the  usual  course 
and  the  ridges  form  loops,  typical  concentric  whorls  and  spiral  whorls  or 
spirals.  These  patterns  are  arranged  about  a  central  core  which  corresponds 
to  the  center  or  summit  of  the  mound.  At  the  point  of  origin  of  certain  ridges 
of  the  patterns,  formations  may  be  found  which  resemble  the  letter  delta  and 
are  therefore  called  "deltas."  In  addition  there  are  distinguished  some  ridges 
which  connect  the  bases  of  adjoining  whorls,  and  according  to  the  mode  in 
which  these  ridges  end,  they  are  designated  as  inner  and  outer  melting 
whorls.  Furthermore,  there  can  be  recognized  the  socalled  "details"  first 
described  by  Galton :  the  forks,  ends,  islands  and  enclosures,  signifying  the 
length  and  shape  of  certain  interrupted  portions  of  ridges. 

Pairs  of  symmetric  fingers  in  both  hands  may  have  their  own  peculiarities. 
In  one  finger  pair  one  pattern  may  predominate,  and  in  another  pair,  another 
pattern.  The  number  of  ridges  may  differ  in  certain  areas  of  the  skin  in 
different  individuals,  and  this  quantitative  factor  behaves  in  a  corresponding 
manner  in  each  finger  pair  in  the  same  individual.  Taking  all  these  peculiari- 
ties together,  it  is  impossible  to  duplicate  the  character  even  of  a  relatively 
small  area  of  friction  skin  in  two  individuals.  The  ridges  are  a  permanent 
bodily  mark,  never  changing  throughout  life;  they  originate  in  the  embryo 
and  even  after  injury  they  form  again  in  the  same  manner,  unless  the  injury 
has  led  to  the  destruction  of  the  entire  epidermis  over  a  given  area. 

As  stated  above,  the  average  frequency  with  which  certain  patterns  occur 


ORGANS  AND  TISSUES  AS  CRITERIA  459 

differs  in  individuals  belonging  to  different  races.  However,  the  relative 
frequency  of  these  patterns  in  different  finger  pairs  is  similar  in  all  races. 
The  ramifications  of  the  cutaneous  nerves  seem  to  determine  the  situation  of 
the  cores  of  the  patterns  and  the  distribution  of  the  nerves  apparently  deter- 
mines also  the  number  and  frequency  of  ridges  in  a  unit  area.  In  addition, 
the  differences  in  the  shape  of  embryonal  fingers,  and  especially  in  their 
surface  radius,  influence  the  character  of  the  patterns.  These  determining 
factors  underlying  the  formation  of  the  patterns,  which  are  thus  complex  in 
nature  and,  to  some  extent,  separate  and  independent  of  one  another,  are 
largely  transmitted  hereditarily  from  parents  to  offspring  in  the  same  way 
as  other  characteristics  constituting  the  bodily  and  psychical  mosaic. 

Of  special  interest,  therefore,  is  the  study  of  the  skin  patterns  in  so-called 
identical  twins,  and  here  it  has  been  found  that  the  number  of  ridges  com- 
posing a  pattern  are  much  more  similar  than  in  bi-oval  twins.  But  even  in 
identical  twins  certain  variations  in  the  patterns  develop.  It  is  therefore 
assumed  that  these  variations  are  phenotypic  in  nature,  that  is,  they  are 
partly  determined  by  environmental  factors  which  are  different  in  each  twin, 
and  these  latter  variations  are  superimposed  upon  the  genetic  factors,  which 
are  identical  in  both. 

There  exist,  also,  sex  differences  in  the  skin  patterns,  but  these  disappear 
in  old  age  with  the  cessation  of  sexual  function;  they  may  therefore  be 
considered  as  constituting  secondary  or  tertiary  sex  characters. 

The  correlation,  noted  by  Poll  in  human  beings,  between  skin  patterns  and 
certain  characteristics  of  parts  of  the  nervous  system,  especially  conditions 
which  lead  to  insanity,  is  of  interest.  This  investigator  finds  that  certain 
patterns  predominate  more  in  normal,  and  other  types  in  insane  persons,  but 
only  in  the  male.  However,  as  in  the  case  of  race  characteristics,  we  have 
here  also  to  deal  merely  with  statistical  differences,  the  frequency  with  which 
certain  characteristics  of  skin  ridges  occur  differing  in  normal  and  in  certain 
insane  persons.  Poll  holds  that  this  correlation  is  due  to  the  fact  that  both  the 
nervous  system  and  the  skin  are  of  ectodermal  origin,  an  interpretation  not 
borne  out  by  the  findings  of  Kretschmer,  that  correlations  exist  also  between 
the  character  of  the  structure  of  the  osseous  system  and  of  the  panniculus 
adiposus  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  tendency  to  the  development  of  certain 
temperaments  and  of  certain  types  of  insanity  on  the  other  hand.  In  a  similar 
way,  Graves  has  observed  a  certain  correlation  between  the  shape  of  the 
scapula  in  a  man  and  his  power  of  resistance  to  injurious  conditions.  It  may 
therefore  be  assumed  that  the  total  skin  pattern,  as  well  as  its  single  features, 
depends  upon  genetic  factors  in  the  same  way  as  the  structures  and  function 
of  other  systems  depend  upon  genetic  factors,  and  there  exist,  probably,  on 
this  basis  correlations  between  various  organ  systems,  irrespective  of  their 
embryonal  relationship. 

II.  Scents  as  criteria  of  individuality.  Distinctive  scents  emanating  from 
animal  organisms  originate  in  the  metabolic  changes  in  certain  organs;  they 
may  therefore  be  classed  among  organ  characteristics  of  the  kind  with  which 
we  have  to  deal  in  this  chapter. 


460  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

It  is  well  known  that  the  reactions  of  many  animals  towards  other  animals 
are  determined  mainly  by  the  sense  of  smell,  which  is  very  much  more  finely 
developed  in  them  than  in  man.  This  sense  of  smell  plays  evidently  a  great 
role  in  the  social-psychical  relationships  of  certain  insects.  It  is  also  appar- 
ently by  means  of  individual  or  family  scents  attaching  to  their  young  that 
certain  animals,  for  instance,  a  guinea  pig  mother,  can  distinguish  their  own 
children  from  the  children  of  others,  and  it  is  this  factor  which  determines 
the  difference  in  their  reactions  towards  their  own  offspring.  In  human 
beings,  this  faculty  is  lost ;  mothers  no  longer  possess  the  ability  to  distinguish 
babies  from  each  other  by  the  sense  of  smell.  That  human  beings,  too,  possess 
characteristic  scents,  however,  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  dogs  can  thus  readily 
distinguish  different  individuals. 

As  early  as  in  1879,  Gustav  Jaeger  drew  attention  to  the  distinctive  scents 
differentiating  human  beings  as  well  as  human  races.  He  maintained,  further- 
more, that  different  species,  genera  and  classes  of  animals,  each  have  their 
own  characteristic  scents,  different  from  those  of  other  groups  of  animals. 
As  to  the  origin  of  scents,  some  of  his  conclusions  were  erroneous.  He 
believed,  for  instance,  that  the  substances  responsible  for  specific  smells  were 
preformed  already  in  the  germ  plasm ;  similarly,  he  assumed  that  the  sub- 
stances, on  which  the  specific  sense  of  taste  depends  in  various  species  of 
animals,  are  present  in  their  germplasm,  and  that  these  substances,  together 
with  certain  pigments  which  distinguish  different  races  and  species,  represent 
the  specific  constitution  of  the  germplasm.  However,  it  is  not  these  substances, 
themselves,  which  are  preformed  in  the  germplasm,  but  rather  certain  other 
substances  which,  in  the  course  of  embryonal  development,  make  possible 
the  formation  of  organs,  whose  metabolism  is  of  such  a  nature  that  the 
specific  scents,  tastes  and  pigments  are  produced.  While,  thus,  the  character 
of  specific  scents  is  ultimately  determined  by  the  constitution  of  the  germ 
cells,  the  scents  as  such,  represent  derivatives  of  germ  cell  constituents.  Jaeger 
erred  in  still  another  direction.  He  did  not  differentiate  between  the  inherited 
individual  or  racial  scents  and  others  which  are  due  to  accidental,  social 
conditions.  Traditional  suggestions  leading  to  emotional  attitudes,  the  result 
of  certain  phases  in  the  social  struggle,  obscured,  in  this  respect,  his  judgment. 

Subsequently,  Correns  drew  attention  to  the  importance  of  individual 
differences  in  the  scent  of  human  beings,  but  it  is  especially  Lohner  who, 
more  recently,  has  analyzed  experimentally  the  character  of  individual  scents 
and  the  reaction  of  dogs  to  them.  According  to  Lohner,  in  human  beings  there 
are  regional  smells  distinctive  of  certain  areas  of  the  body,  which  are  mainly 
seated  in  the  skin  and  which  originate  especially  in  the  secretions  given  off 
by  the  sebaceous  glands.  The  different  regional  smells  in  the  same  individual 
differ  very  much  from  one  another,  from  a  quantitative  as  well  as  from  a 
qualitative  point  of  view,  and  these  differences  may  be  so  pronounced  that 
even  the  human  olfactory  organ  can  differentiate  them  in  the  same  individual. 
On  the  other  hand,  a  human  being  cannot  recognize  the  scent  of  an  individual 
as  a  whole,  while  dogs,  especially  police  dogs,  can  do  so  very  readily.  Accord- 
ing to  Lohner,  such  dogs,  in  addition,  are  able  to  recognize  even  individual 


ORGANS  AND  TISSUES  AS  CRITERIA  461 

differences  in  the  corresponding  regional  smells,  although  it  is  not  certain 
from  Lohner's  report  that  this  fact  has  been  experimentally  established. 
However,  if  this  view  should  be  correct,  then  it  would  follow  that  the  scent 
of  an  individual  is  not  only  a  composite  effect  of  his  multiple  regional  scents, 
but  there  is,  besides,  a  specific  feature  attached  to  each  regional  scent  of  a 
given  individual.  It  is  of  interest  also  that,  secondarily,  these  scents  are 
influenced  by  the  functioning  of  the  sex  organs  and  that  they  become  quanti- 
tatively more  pronounced  at  the  time  of  puberty.  It  has  been  found,  more- 
over, that  likewise  the  distribution  of  the  openings  of  the  sweat  glands  are 
individual  characteristics  in  man. 

We  see,  then,  that  in  the  case  of  individual  scents,  as  in  the  case  of  skin 
patterns,  we  have  to  deal  with  complex  effects  which  represent  the  result  of 
the  composite  actions  of  more  elementary  units.  Organismal  differentials  are 
not  involved  in  either  instance,  but  rather  special  substances  or  structures 
inherent  in  certain  tissues  or  organs;  these  localized  characteristics  are  not 
inherent  equally  in  all,  or  even  almost  all,  the  tissues  of  an  individual,  but 
they  are  specific  for  each  individual.  They  must  therefore  be  included  among 
the  mosaic  characters  which  distinguish  individuals. 

III.  We  have  discussed  more  in  deta-il  two  inherited  conditions  in  man  as 
examples  of  individual  differences  of  organs,  or  tissues,  their  structures  and 
chemical  characteristics.  But  similar  differences  are  found  also  between  the 
other  analogous  organs  and  tissues  in  different  individuals  and  species.  On 
the  other  hand,  analogous  organs  have  essential  features  as  to  metabolism 
and  function  in  common  in  different  species,  especially  in  more  nearly 
related  ones;  the  differences  which  they  show  become  individualized  the 
more,  the  further  advanced  these  species  are  in  the  phylogenetic  and  onto- 
genetic scale. 

In  mice  it  can  be  demonstrated  that  in  different,  closely  inbred  strains, 
various  organs  such  as  thyroid  and  corpus  luteum,  differ  in  their  structural 
and,  therefore,  also  functional  age  curve;  likewise,  notwithstanding  the 
essential  similarity  in  structure  of  vagina  and  uterus,  the  structure  of  the 
maternal  placenta  in  nearly  related  species  shows  some  notable  differences. 
Furthermore,  different  species  of  fresh-water  fishes  present  characteristic 
differences  in  their  reaction  to  differences  in  C02  pressure  in  the  water  in 
which  they  live  (Irving).  The  structure  and  physiologic  reactions  of  the  red 
corpuscles,  the  crystalline  forms  of  hemoglobin  differ  in  different  species, 
and  these  differences  are,  to  a  certain  extent,  correlated  with  the  phylogenetic 
relationship  of  the  species  from  which  they  are  derived  (Reichert  and 
Brown). 

As  a  further  example  of  this  type  of  specificity,  we  might  mention  the 
manner  in  which  various  species  or  classes  of  animals  react  against  phenyl- 
acetic  acid  when  it  is  introduced  into  their  bodies.  In  the  majority  of  mam- 
mals, including  monkeys,  this  substance  combines  with  the  aminoacetic  acid 
(glycin),  and  it  leaves  the  body  in  the  form  of  phenaceturic  acid.  In  man 
and  in  anthropoid  ape  (chimpanzee)  phenylacetic  acid  combines  with  glut- 
amine,  the  amide  of  glutamic  acid,  a  dicarboxy  acid,  to  form  phenylacetyl 


462  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

glutamine.  In  birds,  and  presumably  also  in  reptiles,  it  combines  with 
diaminovaleric  acid  (ornithin),  the  principal  endproduct  of  protein  metabo- 
lism in  these  classes  of  animals.  Or,  to  mention  another  example :  while  in 
man  and  mammals  in  general,  in  amphibia  and  fish  the  principal  endproduct 
of  amino  acid  metabolism  is  urea,  in  birds  and  reptiles  the  principal  end- 
product  of  protein  breakdown  is  uric  acid. 

Individual  differences  in  the  electric  potential  of  the  grey  matter  of  the 
brain,  originating  presumably  in  the  structure  and  function  of  the  ganglia 
cells,  are  found  when  electric  currents  are  obtained  with  electrodes  placed  on 
different  parts  of  the  skull  or  brain  surface  (Hallowell  Davis).  A  similar 
individualization  in  electric  potentials  also  exists  in  different  parts  of  the 
eye,  and  the  totality  of  such  potential  gradients  in  the  adult  and  in  the 
embryo  seems  to  be  characteristic  of  different  species.  Similar  findings  may 
be  obtained  presumably  in  every  organ  and  every  tissue,  and  we  may  assume 
that  at  least  in  the  higher  organisms  it  might  be  possible  not  only  to  discover 
species  and  strain  differences  in  all  the  organs  and  their  functions,  but  also 
individual  differences,  in  accordance  with  inherited  constitutional  character- 
istics, if  only  we  had  fine  enough  methods  to  recognize  them. 

In  a  general  way,  such  organ  and  tissue  differences  parallel,  in  their  de- 
velopment, the  phylogenetic  evolution  of  these  species,  but  there  are  many 
exceptions  to  this  rule.  Two  examples  in  which  a  strict  parallelism  does  not 
exist  may  be  mentioned,  namely  ( 1 )  the  substances  which  control  the  expan- 
sion and  contraction  of  the  melanophores  of  the  skin,  become  effective  in 
some  classes  of  animals  mainly  through  the  nervous  system,  when  they 
function  as  neurohormones ;  in  other  classes,  through  the  blood,  when  they 
function  as  ordinary  hormones.  Sex  determination  depends,  in  part,  on  the 
distribution  of  two  chromosomes  in  male  and  female  in  two  possible  ways ;  in 
vertebrates  as  well  as  in  insects,  these  two  modes  of  distribution  are  found 
irregularly  present,  without  reference  to  phylogenetic  relationship ;  likewise 
the  means  of  control  of  the  state  of  contraction  of  the  chromatophores  are 
irregularly  distributed. 

The  organism  consists  therefore  of  a  mosaic  of  organs  and  tissues;  but 
the  units  in  this  mosaic  are  subdivided  again  into  smaller  units  and  thus  the 
mosaic  is  really  much  finer  than  it  might  appear  if  only  gross  methods  of  dif- 
ferentiation are  used.  It  is  by  means  of  a  more  detailed  microscopic  examina- 
tion and  a  study  of  the  mode  of  reactions,  of  different  tissues  to  various 
hormones  that  very  fine  subdivisions  are  revealed,  as  for  instance,  in  vagina, 
cervix  and  uterus  of  the  guinea  pig ;  and  this  is  true  of  connective  tissue  as  well 
of  epithelial  structures.  As  mentioned  already,  in  tissue  cultures  of  various 
embryonal  structures  R.  C.  Parker  has  shown  that  fibroblasts  derived  from 
different  organs  behave  differently  in  regard  to  rapidity  of  growth,  produc- 
tion of  acid,  as  well  as  solution  of  fibrin,  and  these  characteristics  remain 
constant  in  vitro,  although,  on  the  whole,  they  may  change  with  advancing 
development.  The  existence  of  definite  units  constituting  the  organism  is  also 
indicated  by  the  study  of  inheritance  of  organ  characteristics  in  accordance 
with  Mendelian  principles.  Furthermore,  those  factors  whose  development  is 
controlled  by  gene-hormones  in  various  insects  represent  mosaic  character- 


ORGANS  AND  TISSUES  AS  CRITERIA  463 

istics,  such  as  the  color  of  the  eye.  However,  structural  and  functional  sub- 
divisions in  the  living  adult  organism  do  not  need  to  be  sharply  separated, 
but  transitional  areas  may  gradually  lead  from  one  unit  to  the  adjoining  one. 
And  all  these  organ  and  tissue  units,  which  make  up  the  mosaic  of  the 
organism,  are  connected  into  one  functionally  unified  whole  by  means  of 
hormones,  including  contact  substances,  and  the  nervous  system. 

Accompanying  the  structure  of  organs  and  tissues  are  their  functions. 
As  they  are  actually  studied,  they  are  essentially  the  functions  of  species 
and  not  of  individuals;  they  are  therefore  those  which  are  shared  by  the 
individuals  of  a  species ;  they  bear  the  character  of  species  differentials.  Of 
this  nature  is  the  tendency  to  maintain  a  constant  osmotic  pressure  and  fluid 
content  in  the  bodyfluids,  termed  by  us  homoiotonia  and  homoiohydria,  to 
which  might  be  added  homoioproteinemia,  the  tendency  to  keep  the  protein 
content  of  the  blood  constant,  and,  in  general,  the  condition  called  by  Cannon, 
homoiostasis,  which  comprises  the  sum  of  all  the  mechanisms  which  tend  to 
keep  the  constitution  of  the  bodyfluids,  the  milieu  interne,  within  narrow 
limits  constant.  However,  within  these  functional  mechanisms  characteristic 
of  species  there  are  those  due  to  the  variations  of  individuals,  of  which  the 
species  type  merely  represents  the  average.  In  different  individuals  the  func- 
tions of  different  organs  may  show  independent  primary  variations,  which 
secondarily  may  lead  to  adjustments  which  concern  the  individual  as  a  whole. 
These  individual  differences  in  organ  functions,  associated  as  they  are  with 
visible  or  invisible  structural  differences,  may  also  be  used  for  the  character- 
ization and  distinction  of  individuals. 

Besides  regulating  function,  the  hormones  present  in  endocrine  organs, 
and  similar  substances  present  in  other  organs,  such  as  bone  marrow,  liver 
and  kidney,  may,  in  an  organ-specific  way,  regulate  also  growth,  promoting  or 
inhibiting  it,  and  some  of  these  substances  may  to  some  extent  control  the 
organ  in  which  they  originated.  But  the  organs  where  the  hormones  are 
produced,  and  the  various  constituents  of  the  nervous  system  which  are 
endowed  with  the  function  of  controlling  and  coordinating  other  organs,  are 
merely  parts  of  the  mosaic  organ  system.  They  function  by  means  of  their 
organ  characteristics,  and  the  hormones  which  they  produce  are  not,  as  a 
rule,  endowed  with  the  organismal  differentials  which  are  however  present 
in  these  organs.  But  there  are  indications  that  some  hormones,  as  for  instance, 
the  gonadotropic  hormones  of  the  pituitary  gland,  possess  species  or  class 
differentials.  This  specificity  applies  presumably  only  to  those  hormones 
which  chemically  have  a  more  complex  structure,  and  which  consist  of  or 
are  combined  with  proteins.  During  ontogenetic  development,  organizers, 
which  at  very  early  stages  may  induce  the  reproduction  of  approximately  the 
whole  embryonal  organism,  but  gradually,  with  the  increasing  differentiation 
and  specialization  of  the  parts  of  the  organism,  become  more  specialized, 
exert  a  controlling,  unifying  influence  in  cooperation  with  the  specific 
substratum  on  which  they  act.  However,  it  will  be  necessary  ultimately  to 
trace  backward  these  specific  substrata  and  organizers  to  simpler  structures 
which  represent  the  precursors  of  such  specific  formations. 

Combined  with  the  mosaic  individuality  is  the  system  of  organismal  dif- 


464  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ferentials  which  help  to  produce  the  autogenous  or,  more  generally,  the 
organismal  tissue  equilibrium,  and  which  are  present  throughout  the  various 
parts  of  the  organism.  They  represent  a  second  unity  and  are  the  foundation 
of  another  type  of  individuality  which,  in  contrast  to  the  mosaic  type,  might 
be  designated  as  the  essential  individuality.  From  a  genetic  point  of  view, 
tissue  and  organ  characteristics,  as  well  as  individuality  and  species  differ- 
entials, ultimately  depend  upon  the  genetic  constitution  of  individuals  and 
species  and  there  is  therefore  a  close  relation  between  these  two  factors ; 
however,  the  number  of  genes  determining  them,  and  perhaps  also  the 
character  of  the  individual  genes  which  enter  into  their  composition,  differ, 
and  there  is  therefore  no  complete  parallelism  between  organ  characteristics 
and  organismal  differentials. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  chemical  structure,  we  may  conceive  of  the 
organ  and  tissue  units  as  essentially  consisting  of  a  base  of  proteins  which 
have  undergone  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development.  These  proteins 
may  be  assumed  to  be  the  bearers  of  characteristics  common  to  all  living 
protoplasm  ;  but  on  this  foundation  there  are  built  protein  characteristics,  first 
of  the  largest  animal  group,  to  which  the  organism  bearing  these  organs 
belongs,  and  gradually  there  are  added  to  these  in  sequence,  constellations  in 
the  protein,  which  are  characteristic  of  class,  order,  family,  genus,  species, 
strain  and  individual.  These  represent  the  organismal  differentials.  There 
develops  also  in  association  with  this  basic  protein  structure,  phylogenetically 
and  ontogenetically,  a  subdivision  of  each  organism  into  a  mosaic  of  organ 
and  tissue  units,  in  which  there  are  added  to  this  protein  base,  new  protein 
constellations  differing  in  different  organs  and  tissues ;  or  looser  associations 
of  the  proteins  with  other,  at  first  presumably  very  complex,  substances  of  a 
carbohydrate  or  lipoid  character  are  acquired.  In  this  case,  likewise  in 
sequence,  an  increasing  differentiation  of  these  mosaic  organ  and  tissue  units 
occurs,  until  in  the  end  the  most  complex  individual  is  established.  Being 
built  upon  the  foundation  of  organismal  differentials,  these  units  contain  the 
class,  order,  species  and  individual  characteristics  which  all  parts  of  the 
organism  have  in  common;  but  there  develop  also  in  these  chemical  struc- 
tures, smaller  units  which  may  become  detached  from  the  main  substance, 
and  which  as  a  rule  show  less  or  none  of  these  organismal  differentials ; 
these  function  as  enzymes,  hormones,  and  certain  other  substances.  In  study- 
ing the  factors  which  bind  the  cellular  constituents  into  the  organ  and  tissue 
units  and  which  cause  the  interaction  of  different  organs  and  tissues  within 
the  same  individual,  specificities  characteristic  of  class,  order,  species  or 
individual,  may  be  present  or  may  be  lacking.  In  the  latter  case  we  can 
exclude  participation  of  the  various  organismal  differentials  in  the  reaction 
or  function  of  these  organs  and  tissues.  But  if  a  function  or  reaction  does 
show  such  an  organismal  specificity,  then  the  further  question  arises  as  to 
whether  this  specificity  is  to  be  attributed  to  the  organismal  differential 
chemical  groups  as  such,  or  to  other  structural  peculiarities  of  the  organ 
and  tissue  units,  which  presumably  originally  developed  under  the  influence 
of  the  organismal  differentials,  but  which  secondarily  assumed  a  constitution 


ORGANS  AND  TISSUES  AS  CRITERIA  465 

distinct  from  that  of  the  latter.  It  may  be  impossible  in  many  cases  to  answer 
such  a  question.  These  difficulties  arise  especially  if  there  are  found  chemical 
characteristics  in  a  certain  group  or  tissue  of  an  organism  and  if  these  are 
lacking  in  other  organs.  In  such  a  case  class  or  species  specificities,  which  in 
other  instances  are  due  to  the  existence  of  organismal  differentials,  may  be 
due  to  chemical  structures  of  a  different  kind  in  which  the  organismal  dif- 
ferentials are  not  involved.  This  question  may  arise  also  if  we  have  to  deal 
with  characteristics  of  organs  and  tissues  which  distinguish  one  species,  or 
one  individual,  from  another,  but  in  which  these  organ  differentials  do  not 
show  the  gradations  corresponding  to  the  degrees  of  phylogenetic  relationship. 

While  skin  patterns  as  well  as  scents  are  characteristic  of  individuals  and 
may  differentiate  one  from  another,  it  has  not  been  shown  that  these 
structural  and  biochemical  characteristics  can  be  used  for  determining  the 
relationships  between  organisms  belonging  to  the  same  species  in  the  same 
sense  in  which  individuality  differentials  can  be  used  for  this  purpose.  This 
fact  does  not  exclude  the  possibility  that  as  a  result  of  close  inbreeding, 
continued  through  successive  generations,  we  might  approach  a  homogeneous 
population,  in  which  all  component  individuals  would  presumably  have  very 
nearly  the  same  skin  patterns  and  scents.  There  are  other  tissue  and  cell 
characters  which  show  a  certain  group  distribution,  which  is  largely  inde- 
pendent of  individual  and  species  relationship.  This  is  true,  for  instance,  of 
the  agglutinability  of  the  red  corpuscles  according  to  which  individuals  can 
be  assigned  to  one  of  the  four  primary  blood  groups ;  although  these  char- 
acteristics may  be  similar  in  related  species  such  as  men  and  certain  apes. 
There  are  other  tissue  or  cell  characters,  such  as  the  heterophile  differentials, 
which  are  distributed  quite  irregularly  among  different  species,  without 
regard  to  relationship.  Some  substances  show  variations  in  constitution,  which, 
within  a  definite  range,  correspond  to  relationships  of  species ;  this  seems  to 
be  true  of  the  hemoglobins,  and  there  is  some  reason  for  assuming  that  it  is 
true  of  other  kinds  of  proteins. 

However,  the  larger  the  number  of  tissue  and  organ  characteristics  of 
individuals,  families  and  species  which  we  use  for  identification,  the  more 
probably  will  become  the  chance  that,  in  their  totality,  their  distribution  will 
correspond  to  relationships  between  these  individuals,  families  and  species. 
Thus,  if  we  study  various  organ  systems  in  different  species,  a  correspond- 
ence is  found,  at  least  in  a  general  way,  between  these  structures  and  the 
phylogenetic  relationship  of  these  species ;  comparative  anatomy  and  bio- 
chemistry can  help  thus  in  the  tracing  of  phylogenetic  relationships,  and  more 
intricate  studies  of  the  evolution  of  organ  systems  may  likewise  reveal 
individual  and  family  relationships.  We  may  therefore  conclude  that  various 
kinds  of  tissue  and  organ  differentials,  whether  structural,  biochemical,  or 
functional,  may  serve  to  distinguish  between  individuals,  and  insofar  as 
these  characteristics  have  a  genetic  basis,  they  might,  in  a  limited  way,  even 
indicate  certain  relationships  between  individuals;  but  they  would  not  there- 
fore become  identical  with  individuality  differentials. 


Chapter  J 

Organismal  Differentials  and  Specific  Adaptation 
of  Tissues  and  Their  Products 

In  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  used  the  interactions  between  whole 
organisms  or  parts  of  organisms,  between  organisms  and  tissues  or 
organs,  as  indicators  of  organismal  relationship;  which  means  the  rela- 
tionship of  organisms  or  of  parts  of  organisms,  in  accordance  with  the  data 
of  phylogeny;  and  it  is  the  organismal  differentials  which  express  these 
relationships ;  but  in  addition  the  interaction  between  certain  substances 
which  are  produced  by  organisms,  or  the  interaction  of  such  substances  with 
cells  or  tissues,  may  likewise  indicate  these  relationships.  If  a  tissue  or  such 
a  substance  interacts  more  efficiently  with  an  organ  and  its  products  derived 
from  the  same  phylogenetic  group  than  with  an  organ  or  its  products  derived 
from  a  strange  phylogenetic  group,  then  these  substances  or  tissues  may  be 
designated  as  "specifically  adapted"  to  each  other,  especially  if  the  degree  of 
efficiency  in  this  interaction  is  the  greater  the  nearer  the  phylogenetic  rela- 
tionship. We  have  previously  discussed  various  interactions  of  tissues  which 
are  mediated  by  substances  which,  as  a  rule,  do  not  carry  the  organismal 
differentials,  such  as  hormones  and  organizers,  the  latter  functioning  as 
organ-  and  tissuespecific  substances.  We  also  have  given  some  reasons  for 
assuming  that  certain  substances  bearing  individuality  differentials  may 
function  as  autogenous  regulators,  which  maintain  the  equilibrium  between 
adjoining  tissues ;  the  localized  substitution  of  a  homoiogenous  for  an  autog- 
enous tissue  may  alter  the  normal  activity  and  relationship  of  tissues,  and 
there  are  good  reasons  for  believing  that  these  changes  are  caused  by  the 
character  of  the  substances  given  off  by  homoiogenous  tissues.  However, 
before  we  enter  into  a  discussion  of  such  substances,  in  which  organismal 
differentials  determine  the  specific  adaptation  of  tissues  to  each  other,  it 
might  be  well  to  define  again  the  different  meanings  which  may  be  attached 
to  the  terms  specificity  and  specific  adaptation,  as  far  as  they  refer  to 
organisms. 

1.  The  term  "specificity"  may  be  applied  solely  to  organs  or  tissues  inter- 
acting within  an  organism,  without  reference  to  the  organism  as  a  whole; 
such  a  condition  may  be  designated  as  organ,  tissue  or  function  specificity. 
The  term  "specific"  may  thus  accentuate  differences  between  different  organs 
and  tissues  within  the  same  kind  of  organisms.  It  may  include  the  most 
important  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  as  well  as  others  of  secondary 
importance;  and,  furthermore,  structural  and  functional  peculiarities  which 
depend  presumably  on  the  presence  of  such  differential  substances.  We  have 
discussed  these  organ  and  tissue  specificities  in  the  preceding  chapter.  In  a 
wider  sense,  this  term  may  also  include  enzymes  and  hormones  produced  by 

466 


ADAPTATION  OF  TISSUES  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS     467 

certain  tissues  or  organs   within  an  organism,   because   they   differ   from 
substances  produced  by  other  related  tissues  in  the  same  organism. 

The  term  "specific"  in  this  sense  may  refer  to  a  relation  between  two 
kinds  of  substances,  or  between  a  substance  and  an  organ  or  tissue,  or 
between  the  function  and  structure  of  various  organs  within  the  same 
organism,  or  between  an  organ  or  tissue  and  environmental  factors.  Such 
specific  relations  exist,  for  instance,  between  an  enzyme  and  its  substratum, 
between  a  hormone  and  the  organ  on  which  it  acts,  between  an  environ- 
mental factor  and  a  particular  sense  organ,  and  between  various  organs  and 
organ  systems  within  the  same  organism.  We  have  here  to  deal  with  intra- 
organismal  tissue,  organ  and  substance  adaptations.  Specific  in  this  sense  are 
also  the  relations  obtaining  in  general  between  parasites  and  hosts,  as  well 
as  the  relations  between  man  and  domesticated  animals.  These  may  also 
depend  on  tissue  or  organ  specificities  but  in  these  adaptations  there  may 
participate,  secondarily,  also  the  organismal  differentials,  and  these  specifici- 
ties are  therefore  organismal  in  character  and  may  be  classed  with  type  2. 
In  general  if  these  organ  characteristics  are  specific  of  individuals  or  species 
they  become  organismal  specificities,  and  such  organ  or  tissue  specificities 
characteristic  of  species  are  used  largely  in  determining  the  systematic  posi- 
tion of  plants  and  animals. 

2.  The  term  "specific"  may  be  used  in  order  to  express  the  fact  that  a 
certain  structure,  substance  or  function  is  limited  to  and  characteristic  of  a 
certain  class  or  species  of  organisms,  or  a  certain  individual.  This  is 
organismal  specificity.  There  is  no  reference  made,  in  this  case  to  a  particular 
adaptation  which  this  structure,  substance  or  function  may  bear  to  others  in 
the  same  organism.  Thus,  in  certain  tropical  nymphaeaceae,  the  pollen-tube 
grows  out  and  fertilization  can  occur  if  the  surrounding  medium  contains  a 
very  small  amount  of  boric  acid.  This  is  apparently  a  specific  characteristic 
of  these  plants  and  is  not  known  to  apply  to  other  plants.  In  this  sense  the 
chitinous  integument  is  specific  for  certain  classes  of  animals.  Limulus  and 
other  arthropods  have  respiratory  blood  pigments,  which  are  peculiar  to 
these  types  of  organisms.  In  the  metabolism  of  birds,  allantoin  plays  a  specific 
role.  Different  hemoglobins  are  specific  for  species,  and  in  certain  respects, 
for  individuals.  We  have  referred  to  other  similar  examples  of  this  kind  of 
specificity  in  the  preceding  chapter.  While  these  specific  structures,  substances 
or  functions  may  actually  enter  into  relationship  with  others  bearing  a  corres- 
ponding organismal  differential,  we  leave  this  possibility  out  of  consideration 
under  present  conditions.  A  certain  combination  of  structural,  metabolic  and 
functional  peculiarities  is  characteristic  of  a  given  individual  or  species.  Also, 
in  the  realm  of  psychical-nervous  functions  there  exist  specificities  of  a 
similar  kind.  Thus  a  certain  event  calls  forth  in  one  individual,  but  not  in 
another,  a  peculiar  reaction,  often  depending  upon  a  preceding  experience  of 
the  first  individual,  which  was  peculiar  to  him  and  not  shared  by  certain  other 
individuals.  While  these  two  types  of  specificity  represent  distinct  character- 
istics of  organs  and  tissues,  still  they  appear  as  a  rule  associated  with  each 
other. 


468  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

3.  The  term  "specific  adaptation"  may  be  used  to  designate  the  difference 
between  the  results  of  the  interactions  of  two  substances  or  tissues  if  they 
take  place  on  the  one  hand  between  individuals  A  and  B,  and  on  the  other 
hand  between  individuals  A  and  C ;  and  likewise  between  species  S  and  T  and 
species  S  and  R.  These  differences  in  the  results  of  interaction  depend  upon 
the  character  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  different  individuals  or 
species,  and  the  degree  of  these  differences  should  then  be  graded  in  corres- 
pondence with  the  degree  of  genetic  relationship  between  these  organisms, 
since  the  organs  or  substances  involved  find,  in  more  nearly  related  organisms, 
receptors  to  which  they  are  better  fitted  than  to  those  in  less  nearly  related 
organisms.  It  is  the  correspondence  between  the  organismal  differentials  of 
organs,  tissues  or  substances  in  one  organism  and  the  receptors  of  organs, 
tissues  or  substances  in  another  organism,  which  characterizes  the  specific 
adaptation  in  the  reaction  between  them. 

Such  a  specific  adaptation  can  be  demonstrated  most  readily  if  we  have  to 
deal  with  class  and  generic  differentials.  The  finer  the  differentials  are  which 
come  into  play,  the  more  difficult  it  is  to  demonstrate  a  mutual  adaptation. 
Thus,  a  specific  adaptation  between  substances  carrying  species  differentials 
can  be  demonstrated  less  readily  than  an  adaptation  between  substances 
carrying  class  or  generic  differentials ;  and  still  greater  is  the  difficulty  when 
individuality  differentials  interact.  This  increasing  difficulty  in  recognizing  the 
presence  of  finer  organismal  differentials  may  be  due  to  deficiencies  in  the  case 
of  the  very  finely  graded  reactions  by  means  of  which  finer  organismal  differen- 
tials are  tested.  We  would  have,  therefore,  to  face  in  this  case  the  same 
problem  which  arose  when,  in  joining  together  more  primitive  tissues  or 
organisms,  it  was  possible  to  demonstrate  the  presence  of  the  coarser,  but  not 
of  the  finer,  organismal  differentials. 

In  all  the  instances  considered  so  far,  we  have  to  deal  with  the  interaction 
of  specifically  adapted  substances  or  tissues  which  are  preformed.  However, 
a  similar  specific  adaptation  can  also  arise  through  active  immunization,  when 
one  substance  serving  as  antigen,  enters  the  system  of  an  organism  belonging 
to  another  species ;  immune  substances  may  then  develop,  which  react  with 
the  antigens  in  a  specific  and  graded  manner,  corresponding  to  the  relation- 
ship of  the  organisms  or  tissues  and  organs  involved  in  these  processes.  We 
have  here,  then,  to  deal  (1)  with  a  specific  adaptation  between  an  antigen 
and  an  antibody,  and  in  addition  (2)  with  a  gradation  in  specificity  in  the 
interaction  between  antigen  and  antibody  in  the  sense  that  other  substances 
may  take  their  place  the  more  readily,  the  more  nearly  related  organs  and 
tissues,  or  the  organisms  are  which  substitute  for  the  primary  antigens  or 
antibodies.  Conversely  the  degree  of  specific  adaptation  between  these  sub- 
stituted antigens  or  antibodies  may  serve  as  the  indicator  of  the  degree  of 
relationship  between  the  primary  substance  and  the  substitutes. 

In  this  discussion  we  have  attributed  the  organismal  reactions  exhibiting 
a  specific  adaptation  to  the  presence  of  organismal  differentials,  with  which 
organ-specific  substances  may  be  combined  in  certain  cases.  However  in 
preceding  chapters  we  have  found  instances  in  which  specific  reactions  be- 


ADAPTATION  OF  TISSUES  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS     469 

tween  organisms  graded  in  accordance  with  their  relationship  depended  on 
substances  which  were  not  identical  with  the  primary  organismal  and  individu- 
ality differentials.  We  have  encountered  reactions  of  this  latter  kind  for  instance 
in  transplantations  among  embryos  which  do  not  possess  organismal  differen- 
tials in  the  strict  sense,  but  instead  possess  precursors  of  these  differentials  ;  we 
have  encountered  examples  of  this  kind  also  among  unicellular  organisms  and 
among  algae;  but  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  also  in  other  cases  the 
equilibrium  between  the  parts  of  an  organism  and  its  graded  interaction  with 
other  organisms  may  depend  on  substances  other  than  the  typical  fully 
developed  organismal  differentials.  We  have  seen  that  the  characteristics  of 
certain  organs  and  tissues  may  also  be  used  in  the  classification  of  organisms 
and  that  the  development  of  the  organs  and  tissues  and  their  differentials 
from  simple  structures  and  substances  to  more  complex,  differentiated  ones 
has  taken  place  in  association  with  the  corresponding  development  of  the 
organismal  differentials.  Substances  other  than  organismal  differentials  may 
be  involved  in  the  reactions  which  exhibit  specific  adaptations  between  organ- 
isms. Some  of  the  substances  which  are  the  bearers  of  these  specifically 
adapted  relations  seem  to  be  relatively  simple,  heat  resistant  substances,  of 
neither  a  protein  nor  of  a  complex  carbohydrate  or  lipoid  nature,  therefore 
quite  distinct  from  the  organismal  differential  substances  in  the  strict  sense, 
although  the  possibility  exists  that  they  are  derived  from  the  latter  type  of 
differentials.  Our  present  limited  knowledge  does  not  make  it  possible,  in 
many  instances,  to  distinguish  between  these  different  types  of  substances  and 
the  specific  reactions  which  they  cause.  We  may  then  apply  in  these  cases  the 
term  organismal  differentials  in  a  wider  sense,  which  includes  substances 
which  are  concerned  with  the  production  of  specific  adaptations. 

We  may  now  cite  some  examples  of  specific  adaptations  in  the  interaction 
of  preformed  substances  which  may  or  may  not  carry  organismal  differentials. 
It  can  be  shown  that  there  exist  in  the  blood  sera  of  various  classes  or  species 
of  vertebrates,  substances  which  in  combination  with  certain  other  substances, 
the  tissue  coagulins  present  in  tissue  extracts  may  cause  either  an  acceleration 
or  an  inhibition  of  blood  coagulation,  in  accordance  with  the  kind  of  animals 
from  which  the  sera  or  extracts  were  obtained,  and  in  accordance  with  the 
length  of  time  during  which  these  two  kinds  of  substances  were  allowed  to 
act  on  each  other  before  they  were  added  to  the  blood  plasma  which  served 
as  test  material.  Now,  there  is  evidence  that  the  substances  in  tissue  extracts 
and  sera  which  act  together  or  perhaps  combine  to  form  agents  accelerating 
the  coagulation  of  the  blood  are  specifically  adapted  to  each  other,  and  there 
is  likewise  a  probability  that  also  the  inhibiting  substances  are,  in  the  same 
sense,  specifically  adapted  to  each  other.  This  would  mean  that  the  accelerat- 
ing, and  perhaps  also  the  inhibiting,  precursor  substances  in  serum  and 
extract  carry  class  or  species  differentials,  and  that  when  substances  carry- 
ing the  same  or  related  differentials  interact,  the  effect  on  coagulation  is  greater 
than  when  substances  carrying  disharmonious  differentials  interact.  A  specific 
adaptation  is  also  noticed  between  tissue  extract  and  blood  plasma,  the  tissue 
extract  of  the  same  class  as  that  from  which  the  plasma  has  been  obtained, 


470  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

presumably  in  combination  with  a  factor  in  the  blood  plasma,  causing 
coagulation  of  the  fibrinogen  more  rapidly  than  that  of  another  class. 

A  similar  type  of  specific  adaptation  between  substances  may  influence 
also  the  behavior  of  cells ;  thus,  according  to  Mudd,  Lucke,  McCutcheon  and 
Strumia,  the  macrophages  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes  of  rabbits  act  as 
phagocytes  towards  bacteria,  and  also  towards  erythrocytes  and  protein- 
coated  collodion  particles,  more  efficiently  if  rabbits  sera  are  used  as  the 
carrier  of  bacteriotropin  than  when  human  sera  are  used.  The  same  specific 
relation  is  seen  if  immune  serum  is  used  instead  of  normal  serum.  The  serum 
with  the  tropin  which  it  contains,  or  the  globulin  fraction  of  the  immune 
serum,  is  supposed  to  spread  over  and  to  attach  itself  to  the  surface  of  the 
antigenic  material.  As  a  result  of  this  effect  the  spreading-out  and  phagocytic 
activity  of  the  leucocytes  are  stimulated.  Under  these  conditions  the  leucocytes 
behave  as  if  they  were  able  to  differentiate  between  the  sensitizing  substances 
in  the  sera  of  two  different  mammalian  species. 

Tillett  and  Garner,  and  subsequently  Madison  and  Van  Deventer,  ob- 
served that  a  filterable,  heat-stable  substance  can  be  extracted  from  strepto- 
coccus hemolyticus,  which  fibrinolyzes  plasma.  Substances  from  strepocccci 
isolated  from  inner  human  organs  dissolve  human  plasma  and,  slightly, 
monkey  plasma ;  cultures  of  this  kind  are  inactive  towards  the  plasma  clots  of 
other  animal  species,  such  as  the  rabbit.  In  streptococci  isolated  from  horses 
there  is  a  fibrinolysin  that  is  specific  for  horse  plasma  and  the  same  applies 
to  swine  streptococci  and  swine  plasma.  Addition  of  serum  from  the  same 
species,  especially  of  anti-streptococci  immune  serum,  inhibits  the  action  of 
the  fibrinolysin  in  a  specific  way.  By  serial  passage  of  a  human  streptococcus 
through  rabbits  it  is  possible,  according  to  Reich,  to  cause  in  the  streptococcus 
a  loss  of  the  human  carbohydrate  A  and  a  loss  of  the  fibrinolysin  for  human 
plasma;  instead,  a  carbohydrate  characteristic  of  animals  appears.  By  sub- 
sequent serial  cultures  of  the  streptococcus  on  human  blood  agar  plates,  the 
original  characteristerics  of  this  streptococcus  are  restored. 

In  a  somewhat  related  way,  Duhey  finds  that  the  action  of  serum  is 
specifically  adapted  to  red  corpuscles  of  a  certain  kind.Thus  the  venom  of 
Synancya  horrida  is  hemotoxic  as  well  as  neurotoxic.  The  hemotoxic  action 
against  the  red  blood  corpuscles  of  a  given  species  of  animals  is  much  more 
readily  prevented  through  the  addition  of  serum  of  the  same  species  than  by 
that  of  the  serum  of  a  different  species.  Thus  rabbit  serum  protects  rabbit 
corpuscles,  while  human  serum  protects  human  corpuscles;  a  species  differ- 
ential seems  therefore  to  be  attached  to  an  inhibiting  substance. 

A  further  analogous  condition  is  noted  in  the  interaction  between  blood 
sera  and  the  venom  of  heloderma;  sera  which  do  not  activate  the  hemolytic 
effect  of  this  venom,  inhibit  it.  Now  in  some  cases  hemolysis  of  the  erythro- 
cytes of  a  certain  species  seems  to  be  especially  inhibited  by  the  blood  serum 
of  the  same  species.  Likewise,  Besredka  observed  that  sheep  serum  protects 
sheep  corpuscles,  but  not  the  corpuscles  of  another  species,  in  a  specific 
manner  against  the  hemolytic  action  of  rabbit  serum. 

In  general,  the  blood  serum  of  an  individual  is  specifically  adapted  to  its 


ADAPTATION  OF  TISSUES  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS     471 

own  red  corpuscles  and  the  serum  of  a  species  is  likewise  specifically  adapted 
to  the  red  blood  corpuscles  of  this  species,  although  the  adaptation  between 
the  serum  and  cells  within  a  certain  species  is  not  so  perfect  as  that  between 
serum  and  cells  within  the  same  individual.  Therefore  autohemolysins  do 
not  occur  under  ordinary  conditions  and,  as  a  rule,  cannot  be  produced 
experimentally.  Much  more  common,  however,  is  the  appearance  of  heter- 
olysins.  Examples  of  such  a  specific  adaptation  between  blood  serum  and 
erythrocytes  may  also  be  found  in  invertebrates;  amoebocyte  tissue  which, 
under  certain  conditions,  results  from  the  agglutination  of  the  amoebocytes  of 
Limulus,  remains  better  preserved  in  Limulus  serum  than  in  the  sera  of  other 
kinds  of  arthropods. 

Another  example  of  the  specific  adaptation  between  the  various  constituent 
parts  of  an  individual  is  the  following.  Fresh  serum  or  heparinized  plasma 
from  normal  dogs  as  a  rule  causes  a  local  reaction  in  capillary  permeability 
when  injected  intradermally  into  other  dogs,  but  this  does  not  usually  occur 
when  the  injection  takes  place  into  the  dog  from  which  it  had  been  obtained 
(Freeman  and  Schecter).  This  is  a  further  demonstration  of  an  autogenous 
equilibrium.  On  the  other  hand,  the  presence  of  a  species  equilibrium  is 
indicated,  when,  according  to  Togawa,  injection  of  autogenous  and  homoioge- 
nous  serum  causes  an  early  increase  in  the  amount  of  fibrinogen  in  the  blood 
of  the  injected  animal,  while  heterogenous  serum  usually  does  not  have  this 
effect. 

All  these  observations  have  one  characteristic  in  common :  they  illustrate  a 
species  or  class  or  an  autogenous  equilibrium  which  latter  we  have  analyzed 
previously.  The  various  constituent  parts  of  an  individual  organism  are 
adapted  to  one  another.  Similarly  the  various  components  in  the  organiza- 
tion of  a  species  or  class  are  adapted  to  one  another.  In  a  previous  chapter 
we  have  mentioned  the  fact  that  in  more  primitive  organisms  where  it  is  not 
possible  to  demonstrate  the  existence  of  individuality  differentials,  species  or 
class  equilibria,  indicating  specific  adaptations  between  the  component  parts 
of  these  organisms,  may  be  present. 

There  exists  a  certain  analogy  between  these  specific  adapations  and  the 
specific  adaptation  between  the  red  corpuscles  and  presumably  other  cells 
belonging  to  a  certain  blood  group  and  the  serum  of  this  group.  In  the  latter 
case,  the  specific  adaptation  manifests  itself  by  the  lack  of  an  agglutinating 
effect  of  the  serum  on  the  cells  of  the  group  to  which  both  belong,  although 
such  a  serum  agglutinates  the  cells  of  individuals  belonging  to  other  blood 
groups  which  possess  the  necessary  agglutinogen.  But  in  this  instance  the 
specific  adaptation  is  not  due  to  a  real  species  differential  but  to  a  special 
substance  of  a  somewhat  different  nature.  This  relationship  between  serum 
and  erythrocytes  serves  to  maintain  the  autogenous  equilibrium.  Bernstein, 
however,  interprets  this  phenomenon  in  a  different  manner;  he  assumes  that 
the  antigen  (agglutinogen)  of  a  certain  group,  circulating  in  the  blood  unites 
with  the  corresponding  agglutinin  and  thus  prevents  it  from  becoming  mani- 
fest, while  agglutinins  which  are  able  to  combine  with  a  strange  agglutinogen, 
not  being  bound  by  this  antigen,  remain  active.  However,  if  this  explanation 


472  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

were  correct,  it  would  be  difficult  to  understand  why  the  equilibrum  between 
antigen  and  agglutinin  should  be  always  balanced  in  such  a  way  that  no  free 
agglutinin  can  be  demonstrated  in  the  blood.  We  know  that  in  the  case  of 
toxin-antitoxin  combinations  such  a  perfect  inactivation  of  either  toxin  or  anti- 
toxin is  not  possible.  Moveover,  a  condition  similar  to  that  found  in  the  case 
of  the  blood  groups  applies  also  to  the  Forssman  antigens  and  the  corre- 
sponding hemolysins.  The  blood  sera  of  those  species  which  belong 
to  the  heterophilic  guinea  pig  group  do  not  contain  the  hemolysin  re- 
quired for  this  reaction,  while  the  sera  of  the  species  belonging  to  the  non- 
heterophilic  rabbit  group  do  carry  it.  Now,  in  the  case  of  the  Forssman  anti- 
gen, it  can  be  shown  that  only  animals  belonging  to  the  rabbit  group  can  be 
immunized  against  the  heterophilic  antigen,  while  such  antibodies  cannot  be 
produced  experimentally  in  the  heterophilic  group.  There  must,  therefore, 
be  some  mechanism  which  prevents  the  immunizing  effect  of  antigen  in  the 
latter.  These  findings  seem  to  be  analogous  to  what  we  observe  in  the  case  of 
autogenous  substances ;  they  are  not  able  to  serve  as  antigens.  Constituents 
of  tissues  are  adapted  in  such  a  manner  to  the  organism  to  which  they  belong 
that  they  cannot,  here,  call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies ;  it  seems,  then, 
that  the  possession  of  the  same  individuality  (or  species)  differentials  on  the 
part  of  antigen  and  receptive  organs  prevents  the  disequilibrium  which  is 
necessary  for  the  production  of  artificial  immunity.  It  is  probable  that  this 
mechanism  depends  on  the  identity  of  the  organismal  differential  proteins  in 
an  individual  or  species ;  in  the  latter,  the  species  differential-proteins  are  the 
same,  and  in  an  individual  the  individual  differential  proteins  are  the  same. 
Associated  with  and  presumably  superimposed  upon  these  organismal 
differentials  are  the  organ  and  tissue  differential  substances,  which  differ 
everywhere  within  the  same  individual.  However  in  addition  to  the  typical  or- 
ganismal differentials  also  other  substances  which  help  to  maintain  or  play 
a  role  in  the  autogenous  or  species  equilibrium  may  be  adapted  to  the  other 
parts  of  the  organism  in  such  a  way  that  they  cannot  call  forth  the  production 
of  antibodies  in  the  body  to  which  they  belong. 

A  species  equilibrium  can  be  recognized  as  mentioned  already  in  a  pre- 
vious chapter  in  the  observations  of  F.  R.  Lillie,  who  found  that  substances 
can  be  extracted  from  the  eggs  of  various  species,  which  possess  an  agglutinat- 
ing power  for  the  spermatozoa  of  their  own  species,  but  not  for  those  of 
another  species.  Thus  the  egg  extract  of  Nereis  aggultinates  the  spermatozoa 
of  Nereis,  but  not  the  spermatozoa  of  Arbacia.  Similarly,  the  extract  of  eggs 
of  Strongylocentrotus  fransiscanus  agglutinates  the  spermatozoa  of  the 
same  species,  but  not  those  of  Strongylocentrotus  purpuratus,  though  the 
latter  are  agglutinated  by  the  extracts  of  eggs  of  Strongylocentrotus  pur- 
puratus. However,  such  homoiogenous  agglutinins  cannot  be  demonstrated 
in  the  ova  of  all  species,  as  Miss  Sampson  has  shown.  Heterogenous  agglu- 
tinations may  occur,  but  if  this  is  the  case,  it  is  probable  that  the  heterogenous 
agglutinins  causing  them  are  distinct  from  the  typical  homoiogenous  agglu- 
tinins. There  is  another  difference  between  the  heterogenous  and  homoiog- 
enous agglutinins ;  the  agglutination  produced  by  the  former  may  be  irrevers- 


ADAPTATION  OF  TISSUES  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS     473 

ible,  and  moreover,  the  heteroagglutinins  may  be  toxic  for  the  spermatozoa, 
whereas  the  agglutinations  caused  by  homoioagglutinations  are  reversible  and 
non-toxic  for  the  spermatozoa  (Little  and  Just).  In  addition,  there  has  been 
found  a  more  direct  specific  adaptation  between  eggs  and  spermatozoa,  inas- 
much as  a  smaller  number  of  spermatozoa  suffices  for  the  fertilization  of  eggs 
of  the  same  species  than  for  that  of  eggs  of  other  species  (Jacques  Loeb, 
R.  F.  Lillie). 

A  specifically  adapted  substance,  which  seems  to  be  a  protein,  has  been 
extracted  from  the  sperm  of  the  giant  Keyhole  limpet ;  it  is  able  to  dissolve 
the  membrane  of  eggs  of  the  same  species.  Correspondingly  Abalone  (Haliotis) 
sperm  yields  a  lysin  which  acts  on  the  eggs  of  Abalone ;  cross-lysis  between 
limpet  and  Abalone  does  not  occur  (Tyler).  In  addition  sperm  extracts  of 
Arbacia  seem  to  agglutinate  eggs  of  the  same  species,  and  this  egg-agglutinating 
substance  resists  boiling  for  hours.  Tyler  has  found  that  in  certain  echinoderms 
and  worms  there  may  occur  in  a  watery  extract  of  egg,  a  substance,  fertilizin, 
which  combines  in  a  specific  manner  with  the  homoiogenous  sperm,  but  with- 
out causing  a  noticeable  agglutination  of  the  spermatozoa.  Such  fertilizin  he 
calls  "univalent."  There  may  be  extracted  from  spermatozoa  a  similar  species- 
specific  substance,  an  antifertilizin,  which  combines  with  the  fertilizin,  neutral- 
izes its  sperm  agglutinating  power,  and  agglutinates  the  eggs  from  which  the 
fertilizin  can  be  extracted.  Tyler  noted  moreover  a  certain  relationship  between 
fertilizin  and  the  fourth  component  of  complement  which  is  present  in  normal 
guinea  pigs  serum.  Complement  is  fixed  by  fertilizin,  but  is  released  from 
this  combination  by  the  action  of  antifertilizin;  there  exists  thus  a  certain 
analogy  between  the  action  of  complement  and  antifertilizin. 

In  a  previous  chapter  we  have  referred  to  hormone-like  substances  which 
accelerate  or  induce  metamorphosis  in  insects ;  also  in  amphibia  there  are  indi- 
cations of  the  existence  of  substances  accelerating  metamorphosis.  In  a  similar 
way,  Caswell  Grave  prepared  from  the  larvae  of  two  ascidian  species, 
Polyandrocarpa  and  Phallusia,  extracts  which  induce  metamorphosis  in  their 
own  but  not  of  the  other  species.  These  substances  are  therefore  species- 
specific,  yet  they  are  neither  proteins  nor  lipids ;  perhaps  they  are  amino-acids ; 
but  their  chemical  nature  has  not  been  established. 

According  to  F.  B.  Turck,  a  substance  developing  in  autolysed  muscle,  or 
also  in  other  tissues,  has  on  certain  cells  very  characteristic  effects,  which  are 
either  stimulating  or  injurious,  according  to  the  quantities  used.  This  sub- 
stance, which  Turck  names  "cytost,"  seems  to  be  species-specific.  Thus, 
cytost  from  chicken  acts  specifically  on  chicken  cells  in  tissue  culture,  and 
human  cytost  on  human  cells.  Similarly,  extract  of  dried  paramaecia  appar- 
ently stimulates  the  multiplication  of  paramaecia,  while  extracts  from  chicken, 
rat  or  human  tissues  do  not  have  such  an  effect.  Corresponding  observations 
were  made  with  bacteria.  In  immunization  experiments  it  was  shown  that 
injection  of  autolysed  muscle  of  the  cat  called  forth  active  immunization 
only  against  cytost  from  the  cat,  but  not  against  that  prepared  from  other 
animals. 

Specific  adaptation  may  be  found,  furthermore,  in  the  case  of  enzyme 


474  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

action.  There  exist  not  only  the  first  kinds  of  specificity,  which  imply  that 
one  enzyme  is  different  from  another  one  and  is  peculiar  to  a  certain  species 
or  series  of  species  and  to  a  certain  organ  or  tissue,  but  there  has  been 
demonstrated,  also,  a  specific  adaptation  in  the  sense  here  defined.  Thus  ac- 
cording to  E.  N.  Harvey,  luciferin,  the  substance  which,  in  being  oxidized, 
gives  rise  to  luminescence,  if  acted  on  by  the  oxydation  accelerating  enzyme 
luciferase,  shows  a  specific  adaptation  to  this  enzyme.  Only  the  enzymes 
from  the  same  species,  or  from  species  very  closely  related  to  the  species 
from  which  luciferin  was  obtained,  seem  to  cause  luminescence;  if  solutions 
of  luciferin  and  luciferase  are  prepared  from  Cypridina  and  Systellaspis, 
the  mixing  of  luciferin  from  one  organism  with  the  luciferase  from  the  same 
species  leads  to  a  marked  production  of  light;  but  if  the  solutions  of  luciferin 
from  one  species  are  mixed  with  the  luciferase  from  the  other  species,  the 
results  are  negative. 

Another  example  from  the  field  of  enzyme  activity  is  presented  by  certain 
older  observations  of  Hedin.  There  occurs  in  the  gastric  mucosa  of  various 
vertebrates  not  only  the  milk-curdling  enzyme  rennet,  but,  according  to  Hedin, 
also  a  substance  inhibiting  the  enzymatic  action  of  rennet,  which  can  be 
obtained  if  the  enzyme  is  treated  with  NH4OH.  This  inhibiting  agent  is 
specifically  adapted  to  the  enzyme  of  the  same  species,  both  of  these  sub- 
stances, the  enzyme  as  well  as  the  inhibiting  substance,  carrying  species  dif- 
ferentials. However,  certain  other  substances,  such  as  egg  albumin  and  blood 
serum,  may  also  contain  inhibiting  substances  for  rennet,  but  they  are  non- 
specific; charcoal,  likewise,  may  act  in  a  non-specific  manner.  The  species 
differential  which  is  present  in  rennet  participates  in  the  antigenic  function 
of  this  substance  and  calls  forth  in  the  animal,  immunized  against  the  rennet, 
the  development  of  an  anti-rennet,  which  is  specifically  adapted  to  rennet  in 
a  way  similar  to  the  natural  anti-rennet.  However,  these  investigations  may 
perhaps  have  to  be  reconsidered  in  the  light  of  more  recent  studies  on 
proteinolytic  enzymes  of  the  gastro-intestinal  tract.  As  far  as  the  various 
enzymes  and  their  precursors  in  the  gastro-intestinal  tract,  which  have  been 
separated  in  recent  years  by  Northrop  and  Kunitz,  are  concerned,  it  has  been 
shown  that  their  constitution  differs  in  different  species.  Similarly,  catalase 
seems  to  differ  somewhat  in  different  species  (Sumner);  also  the  urease 
which  has  been  found  in  various  tissues  and  in  the  blood  serum  of  Limulus 
seems  to  be  specific  for  this  animal  (Loeb  and  Bodansky).  However,  no 
instance  of  specific  adaptation  has  been  observed  so  far  in  these  substances. 
Considerably  more  readily  demonstrable  than  the  species-specificity  is  the 
organ  or  "substance"  specificity  of  these  enzymes;  each  one  is  adapted  to  a 
definite  type  of  substratum. 

A  specific  adaptation  is  characteristic  of  many  antigens  and  immune  sub- 
stances. In  order  to  produce  an  antibody  it  is  necessary  to  introduce  into  the 
organism  which  is  to  be  immunized,  a  substance  sufficiently  strange  to  it  to 
cause  a  certain  disequilibrium.  In  many  cases  it  is  the  introduction  of  a  strange 
organismal  differential  which  serves  as  antigen  and  makes  possible  the  pro- 
duction of  an  antibody  carrying  the  corresponding  organismal  differential. 


ADAPTATION  OF  TISSUES  AND  THEIR  PRODUCTS     475 

It  seems  that  specific  adaptations  of  the  kind  mentioned  here  may  underlie 
also  some  types  of  parasitism,  the  parasite  becoming  adapted  to  certain  sub- 
stances of  the  host  which  carry  the  species  differential  of  the  host,  or  at  least 
differentiate  one  type  of  host  from  other  types  of  hosts.  Thus,  according  to  J. 
H.  Welsh,  the  freshwater  mussel,  Anodonta  cataracta  Say,  is  infested  with 
parasitic  water  mites  (Unionicola  Ypsilophorus),  which  live  between  the  gills 
of  their  host.  In  the  free-living  state  these  mites  are  positively  heliotropic,  but 
if  to  the  water  in  which  a  positive  heliotropic  reaction  would  otherwise  take 
place,  an  extract  of  the  gills  of  the  host  or  water  from  the  mantle  cavity  of 
the  host  is  added,  they  become  negatively  heliotropic,  thus  assuming  the 
characteristic  behavior  they  show  in  their  parasitic  life.  It  is  interesting  to 
note  that  in  the  case  of  Unionicola,  which  parasitizes  on  Anodonta,  only 
material  from  this  particular  host  will  bring  about  such  a  change  in  be- 
havior, whereas  corresponding  substances  from  other  species,  such  as  Ellipho 
or  Lampsilis,  have  no  effect  on  the  parasite.  In  this  instance  we  have  to  deal 
evidently  with  a  specific  adaptation  between  host  and  parasite,  which  depends 
upon  the  interaction  of  certain  specific  substances.  However,  whether  the 
substances,  which  play  the  decisive  role  in  these  and  certain  other  cases, 
actually  carry  the  organismal  differentials,  or  are  merely  derivatives  of  or 
otherwise  related  to  these  differentials,  cannot  be  decided  without  further  tests. 
But  it  could  be  made  probable  that  the  substances  concerned  in  these  reactions 
are  at  least  nearly  related  to  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  parasite  and 
host  if,  after  immunization  with  these  substances,  the  antibodies  produced 
were  found  to  react  not  only  with  the  material  which  served  as  antigen,  but 
also  with  other  substances  obtained  from  the  same  host  species,  but  not  from 
distant  species;  or,  if  it  could  be  shown  that  there  is  a  graded  response  of 
the  parasite  to  analogous  substances  from  different  species,  the  response  being 
the  stronger  the  more  nearly  related  the  species  from  which  the  test  substance 
is  obtained,  to  the  host  species  of  that  particular  parasite. 

In  the  examples  which  we  have  cited,  we  have  to  deal  primarily  with  pre- 
formed relations  between  two  substances,  or  between  a  substance  and  a  tissue, 
the  reaction  depending  upon  the  genetic  relationship  between  the  organismal 
differentials  of  the  organisms  concerned,  although  primarily,  organs  and  tis- 
sues and  organ-specific  substances  are  involved  in  the  majority  of  these  reac- 
tions rather  than  purely  individual  and  species-specific  substances.  The  great 
structural  and  functional  specificity  which  is  characteristic  especially  of  the 
higher,  more  differentiated  organisms,  depends  largely  upon  this  interaction 
of  organismal  differentials  or  of  substances  derived  from  them,  or  also  of 
substances  originating  in  organs  which  are  specific  for  a  species  in  a  similar 
manner  in  which  the  organismal  differentials  are  specific,  but  which  differ 
otherwise  from  the  latter.  In  addition,  we  have  cited  some  instances  in  which, 
by  means  of  artificial  immunization,  the  same  specific  relations  between  differ- 
ent organisms,  or  between  the  substances  derived  from  them,  can  be  demon- 
strated in  case  one  of  the  substances  involved  served  as  antigen. 

These  data  may  then  be  interpreted  as  indicating  the  presence  of  autoge- 
nous species  or  class  equilibria,  in  which  the  various  organs  and  substances 


476  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  are  concerned  in  the  function  of  these  organs  are  specifically  adapted  to 
one  another  because  they  carry  the  same  organismal  differentials,  and  in  which 
tissues  or  substances  bearing  strange  organismal  differentials  call  forth  antago- 
nistic reactions  on  the  part  of  the  host.  However,  in  addition  there  may  be 
active  in  this  correlation  between  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  animal 
species  and  the  interaction  of  tissues  and  organs  and  of  substances  concerned 
in  the  functions  of  organs  and  tissues,  other  functions  of  tissues  and  organs, 
in  which  the  organismal  differentials  are  not  involved  and  in  which  the  active 
compounds  may  be  of  a  less  complex  nature.  However  the  finest  and  most  varied 
examples  of  specific  adaptations  are  furnished  by  the  interactions  between 
transplanted  tissues  and  hosts  which  we  have  discussed  in  the  chapters  of  the 
first  part  of  this  book.  These  experiments  furnished  also  the  basic  data  from 
which  the  concepts  of  organismal  and  individuality  differentials  and  of  autoge- 
nous tissue  equilibria  have  developed. 


P^rf    "Y/n  Organismal  Differentials  and  Organ  Differentials 

as  Antigens 


Introductory  Remarks 


When  pieces  of  organisms,  organs  or  tissues,  or  when  cells  or  parts 
of  cells  are  transferred  to  or  united  with  other  organisms  or  parts 
of  them,  there  are  initiated  those  reactions  which  we  have  discussed 
in  the  preceding  chapters,  and  which  may  serve  as  indicators  of  the  nature 
of  organismal  and  organ  or  tissue  differentials.  But  in  addition,  the  introduc- 
tion of  these  tissues  and  cells,  or  of  substances  which  are  derived  from  them, 
may  lead  to  the  production  of  new  substances  and  mechanisms  which  are 
specifically  directed  against  the  bearers  of  the  organismal  and  organ  differ- 
entials. These  latter  kinds  of  reactions  represent  immune  processes  and  the 
altered  state  resulting  in  the  strange  organism  is  that  of  immunity ;  the  specific 
substances  formed  in  these  reactions  are  immune  substances  or  antibodies, 
and  the  substances  which  initiate  these  immune  processes  and  lead  to  the  de- 
velopment of  immunity  are  antigens.  Antigens  and  the  corresponding  anti- 
bodies may  be  considered  as  specifically  adapted  substances,  which  may  either 
develop  spontaneously  or  are  produced  experimentally. 

In  this  part  we  shall  discuss  the  relations  between  organismal  and  organ 
differentials  and  antigens.  We  shall  also  include  in  the  discussion  some  sub- 
stances which  have  certain  characteristics  in  common  with  organismal  or 
organ  differentials,  but  which  differ  from  them  in  some  respects.  There  are, 
in  addition,  substances  which  are  able  to  react  in  a  specific  way  with  antibodies, 
although  unaided  by  proteins  they  may  not  be  able  to  initiate  immune  proc- 
esses, and  therefore  to  act  as  complete  antigens. 

In  the  first  chapter,  we  shall  consider  the  differentials  of  blood  groups  and 
the  heterogenetic  (Forssman)  antigens,  which  while  differing  in  certain  re- 
spects from  the  typical  organismal  and  organ  differentials,  in  some  ways  re- 
semble them. 


477 


Chapter  I 

Blood  Groups,  Heterogenetic  (Forssman)  Anti- 
gens and  Organismal  Differentials 

Iandsteiner  discovered,  about  forty  years  ago,  that  there  can  be  distin- 
guished in  the  human  blood  four  groups  of  red  corpuscles,  according 
-i  to  the  type  of  human  serum  which  agglutinates  them.  Under  normal 
conditions  the  serum  of  a  person  does  not  agglutinate  the  blood  corpuscles  of 
another  person  belonging  to  the  same  group,  but  the  serum  of  individuals 
belonging  to  other  groups  has  this  power,  except  the  serum  of  one  group, 
which  does  not  possess  such  agglutinating  substances  (agglutinins)  for  any  of 
the  blood  groups.  The  red  corpuscles  of  this  latter  group,  on  the  other  hand, 
contain  both  kinds  of  substances  (agglutinogens)  which  are  responsible  for 
the  agglutination  of  corpuscles  under  the  influence  of  the  specific  group  ag- 
glutinins in  two  of  the  groups.  If  the  serum  of  this  group  possessed  an  active 
agglutinin,  it  would  agglutinate  its  own  blood  corpuscles.  There  exists  another 
group  of  individuals  whose  corpuscles  cannot  be  agglutinated  by  the  serum 
of  any  of  the  other  groups,  because  their  corpuscles  lack  both  kinds  of  ag- 
glutinable  substances  (agglutinogens)  ;  correspondingly,  their  blood  serum 
has  agglutinins  for  all  the  other  groups.  Such  agglutinogens,  according  to  the 
terminology  of  Ehrlich's  sidechain  theory,  are  considered  as  receptors,  which 
combine  with  the  agglutinin  to  which  they  are  specifically  adapted  and  such 
a  combination  leads  to  the  process  of  agglutination  of  the  erythrocytes.  Inas- 
much as  these  agglutinogens,  if  injected  parenterally  into  animals  of  a  dif- 
ferent species — e.g.,  the  rabbit — may  give  rise  to  the  formation  of  antibodies 
(immune  agglutinins),  acting  specifically  on  the  type  of  corpuscles  which 
possess  that  particular  agglutinogen  which  was  injected,  they  may  act  also  as 
antigens.  In  general,  they  represent  the  blood-group  differentials. 

We  can  thus  distinguish  four  human  blood  groups,  which  differ  according 
to  the  character  of  agglutinogens  in  their  erythrocytes  as  well  as  according  to 
the  character  of  the  agglutinins  in  their  serum.  In  Group  I,  the  corpuscles  do 
not  have  any  agglutinogens  and  in  the  serum  there  are  found  agglutinins 
alpha  and  beta.  Agglutinin  alpha  has  the  power  to  agglutinate  the  corpuscles 
of  Group  II,  and  agglutinin  beta  agglutinates  the  corpuscles  of  Group  III. 
In  Group  II,  the  corpuscles  carry  agglutinogen  A  and  the  serum  agglutinin 
beta.  In  Group  III,  the  corpuscles  have  agglutinogen  B  and  the  serum  pos- 
sesses agglutinin  alpha.  In  Group  IV  the  corpuscles  have  both  agglutinogens 
A  and  B  and,  correspondingly,  their  serum  lacks  agglutinin  alpha  as  well  as 
beta. 

As  to  the  heterogenetic  (Forssman)  antigens  or  differentials,  these  are 
characterized  by  their  ability  to  call  forth  the  production  of  hemolysins  for 
sheep  corpuscles  if  they  are  injected  into  the  rabbit.  As  a  rule,  only  the  injec- 

478 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  479 

tion  of  the  red  corpuscles  of  a  certain  species  into  a  rabbit  induces  in  the 
latter  the  formation  of  hemolysins  specifically  directed  against  the  corpuscles 
of  that  particular  species.  But  it  has  been  found  by  Forssman  that  it  is  possible 
to  produce  hemolysins  which  dissolve  sheep  corpuscles  not  only  by  the  intro- 
duction of  sheep  erythrocytes  into  a  rabbit,  but  also  by  the  use  of  kidney  of 
the  guinea  pig  or  of  the  horse,  or  of  the  blood  corpuscles  of  chicken,  as  anti- 
gens; if  extracts  of  such  cells  or  tissues  are  injected  into  rabbits,  hemolysins 
for  sheep  corpuscles  will  be  found  to  circulate  in  the  rabbit  blood.  Similar 
differentials  which  may  induce  the  formation  of  hemolysins  for  sheep  cor- 
puscles have  been  found  in  the  tissues  of  the  most  diverse  species  of  animals, 
and  even  in  certain  bacteria,  without  any  reference  to  the  relationship  of  these 
organisms  with  the  sheep ;  but  the  organs  of  certain  other  species,  such  as  the 
rabbit,  do  not  usually  possess  such  antigens.  Accordingly,  two  classes  of  or- 
ganisms are  distinguished,  namely  those  which,  like  the  guinea  pig,  possess 
Forssman  heterogenetic  or  heterophile  differentials,  and  others  which,  like  the 
rabbit,  usually  do  not  possess  such  differentials.  The  term  "heterogenetic"  is 
applied,  because  they  are  found  in  species  and  classes  of  animals  far  distant 
in  relationship  from  the  sheep,  and  even  in  bacteria.  Evidently  these  sub- 
stances behave  in  a  very  different  way  from  organismal  differentials;  there 
is  no  specific  connection  between  the  systematic  relationship  of  these  organisms 
and  the  presence  of  the  heterogenetic  differentials  in  their  cells,  although  the 
possession  of  Forssman  antigens  may  be  characteristic  of  whole  genera  and 
families.  In  addition  to  the  Forssman  antigens  there  exists  still  another  system 
of  heterogenetic  antigens,  which  is  shared  by  bacteria  of  the  hemorrhagic 
septicemia  group  and  the  erythrocytes  of  many  species  of  birds  (Buchbinder), 
and  presumably  many  other  non-related  groups  have  certain  chemical  charac- 
teristics in  common.  In  this  connection  the  fact  may  be  recalled  that  also 
estrogenic  substances  occur  in  the  most  diverse  classes  of  organisms. 

In  order  to  analyze  the  relationship  of  the  blood-group  and  Forssman  dif- 
ferentials to  the  organismal  and  organ  differentials  the  following  questions 
must  be  considered:  (1)  By  what  methods  is  the  presence  of  the  blood-group 
and  Forssman  differentials  determined?  (2)  In  which  organs  and  tissues  do 
these  differentials  occur?  (3)  What  is  the  distribution  of  these  differentials 
among  animals  and  bacteria?  and  (4)  What  is  the  relationship  of  the  blood- 
group  differentials  in  various  animal  species  to  those  in  man? 

Let  us  state  once  more  the  characteristic  features  of  the  organismal  and, 
in  particular,  of  the  individuality  differentials.  In  contradistinction  to  the 
structure  and  function  of  tissues  and  organs,  which  differ  from  one  another, 
there  is  something  common  to  all  these  different  organs  and  tissues  in  the 
same  individual,  at  least  in  the  higher  classes  of  animals,  which  differs  from 
the  corresponding  characteristics  in  all  other  individuals.  If  we  consider  in 
addition,  classes,  orders,  genera  and  species,  and  strains  and  family  relation- 
ships, we  then  find  that  the  various  kinds  of  organismal  differentials,  includ- 
ing the  individuality  differentials,  correspond  in  their  graded  properties  to 
the  graded  phylogenetic  relationships  of  these  various  types  of  organisms. 
This  latter  characteristic  is  very  important  in  the  definition  of  the  organismal 


480  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

differentials ;  it  is  not  sufficient  that  certain  structural  or  functional  peculiari- 
ties should  serve  as  distinguishing  marks  between  different  individuals  or 
species,  but  a  correspondence  between  the  constitution  of  the  organismal 
differentials  and  the  genetic  relationship  of  the  organisms  is  required  in 
addition.  As  we  have  seen,  the  sum  of  certain  organ  or  tissue  differentials,  or 
even  a  single  characteristic  feature  of  a  certain  kind,  may  serve  to  distinguish 
different  species  as  well  as  different  individuals,  but  these  individual  organ 
and  tissue  differentials  do  not  become  thereby  organismal  and  individuality 
differentials.  Thus  the  ridge  patterns  of  the  skin,  the  scents  and  many  other 
peculiarities,  which  are  not  individuality  differentials,  allow  the  differentiation 
between  different  individuals. 

If  we  keep  these  criteria  of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  in  particular 
of  the  individuality  differentials,  in  mind,  the  differences  which  exist  between 
blood-group  differentials,  their  agglutinogens,  and  the  organismal  differen- 
tials are  obvious.  The  primary  blood-group  differentials  allow  the  separation  of 
individuals  into  four  groups,  irrespective  of  their  relationship.  Two  brothers, 
members  of  the  white  race,  may  belong  to  different  blood  groups,  while  one  of 
the  brothers  and  a  member  of  an  African  race,  or  even  an  anthropoid  ape, 
may  belong  to  the  same  group.  Thus  the  difference  between  individuality 
differentials  and  the  differentials  of  blood  groups  is  evident.  Even  the  differen- 
tiation of  individuals  by  means  of  the  four  primary  blood  groups  is  impossible 
as  a  general  rule,  although  in  certain  cases  they  may  help  in  identifying  per- 
sons and  even  in  establishing  relationships  to  other  persons ;  they  resemble 
in  this  respect  other  hereditary  organ  characteristics,  which  may  also  be  used 
for  this  purpose. 

For  the  identification  of  the  blood-group  differentials  we  have  at  our  dis- 
posal :  ( 1 )  The  various  specific  agglutinins  normally  present  in  human  sera ; 
and  (2)  the  specific  immune  agglutinins  which  are  produced  by  injecting, 
into  rabbits,  human  blood  corpuscles  possessing  a  certain  group  differential, 
these  immune  agglutinins  being  absorbed  in  a  specific  manner  by  the  ag- 
glutinogens (group  differentials)  to  which  they  are  adapted.  Either  the  cor- 
puscles as  such,  or  alcohol  extracts  of  the  particular  group  of  erythrocytes 
which  contain  the  specific  group  differentials,  are  used  for  absorption.  By  these 
means  we  can  determine  also  the  occurrence  of  similar  differentials  which 
function  as  agglutinogens  in  blood  corpuscles  of  various  species  of  animals,  or 
we  may  study  the  relationship  of  the  blood-group  differentials  to  other  differ- 
entials, as  for  instance,  the  Forssman  differentials. 

The  same  principle  applies  to  the  analysis  of  the  Forssman  heterogenetic 
differentials,  although  in  this  case  hemolysins,  and  in  particular  those  dis- 
solving sheep  corpuscles,  are  used  instead  of  agglutinins.  Guinea  pig  or  horse 
kidney,  as  bearers  of  the  Forssman  differentials,  serves  as  tissue  with  which 
other  material  may  be  compared.  In  using  these  methods  for  the  analysis  of 
the  identity  or  lack  of  identity  between  different  kinds  of  differentials,  we  find 
that  while  certain  differentials  behave  in  every  respect  like  the  typical  blood- 
group  differentials,  other  differentials  do  so  only  in  an  imperfect  manner.  Re- 
sults of  this  divergent  kind  are  obtained  especially  when  we  study  the  blood- 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  481 

group  differentials  in  various  species,  or  when  we  analyze  the  relationship 
between  Forssman  and  blood-group  differentials,  and  these  results  are  inter- 
preted as  indicating  that  the  various  differentials  have  certain  sidechains  in 
common,  while  they  differ  in  respect  to  others ;  or  it  is  assumed  that  antigens 
with  a  blood-group,  Forssman,  species  or  organ  differential,  which  are  unlike 
in  different  individuals,  are  associated  with  other  differentials  (antigens) 
which  are  the  same  in  two  individuals  and  which  explain  the  partial  con- 
cordance in  the  results  obtained  in  the  testing  of  the  antigens. 

It  is  a  very  characteristic  feature  of  the  individuality  differentials,  and  of 
the  organismal  differentials  in  general,  that  they  occur  in  all  or  almost  all  of 
the  various  tissues  and  organs  of  a  certain  individual  or  species  and  are  not 
restricted  to  one  particular  type  of  cell  or  tissue.  At  first  it  appeared  as  if  the 
blood-group  differentials  were  limited  to  the  erythrocytes,  but  subsequently 
they  have  been  found  also  in  other  cells,  and  according  to  Kritschewsky  and 
Schwarzmann,  they  occur  in  all  the  organs  of  an  individual,  except  the  lens 
of  the  eye.  The  blood  serum  also  seems  to  contain  blood-group  differentials, 
but  here  they  are  present  in  only  a  small  quantity  and  are  apparently  covered 
up  by  other  substances.  They  gained  access  to  the  body-fluid,  presumably 
secondarily,  perhaps  as  the  result  of  the  destruction  of  certain  cells.  As  we 
have  seen,  also  individuality-specific  substances  are  present  in  the  blood 
serum.  In  addition  to  the  blood  serum,  various  secretions,  such  as  saliva  and 
urine,  may  contain  blood-group  differentials.  Landsteiner  and  Levine  demon- 
strated "blood-group  specific  substances"  in  human  spermatozoa,  which  had 
been  freed  from  the  sperm  fluid  through  centrifugation  and  subsequent  wash- 
ing with  salt  solution.  This  observation  suggests  that  germ  cells  contain  pre- 
formed blood-group  differentials ;  otherwise  we  should  have  to  assume  that 
some  of  the  constituents  of  the  sperm  fluid  may  have  adhered  to  the  sperma- 
tozoa, or  that  a  precursor  substance  of  the  fully  developed  differentials,  rather 
than  the  latter  themselves,  was  responsible  for  the  group  antigen  reaction. 

In  regard  to  their  general  distribution  among  various  tissues,  blood-group 
antigens  and  organismal  differentials  behave,  then,  in  a  similar  manner.  As  to 
the  Forssman  differentials,  in  one  species  they  may  occur  only  in  the  erythro- 
cytes, in  another  species  in  the  kidney,  and  perhaps  also  in  the  liver ;  in  still 
others  they  may  be  found  in  the  erythrocytes  as  well  as  in  the  kidney,  and 
in  the  guinea  pig  they  are  present  in  the  kidney,  but  only  in  the  erythrocytes 
of  certain  individuals.  In  man,  according  to  Schiff  and  Adelsberger,  the 
Forssman  differential  is  present  in  those  corpuscles  which  possess  the  blood- 
group  differential  A ;  according  to  Kritschewsky,  it  is  present  also  in  various 
organs,  but  not  in  the  brain.  However,  it  is  possible  that  blood-group  A  and 
the  Forssman  antigen  have  certain  chemical  characteristics  in  common,  while 
they  differ  in  respect  to  others ;  or  there  may  be  perhaps  not  even  an  identity 
of  certain  chemical  groups,  but  merely  a  chemical  similarity  in  these  two 
antigens.  This  similarity  in  chemical  structure  may  lead  to  an  overlapping 
in  the  action  of  the  resulting  antibodies.  In  their  wide  distribution  in  human 
tissues  the  blood-group  differentials  would  then  differ  from  the  typical  organ 
differentials  which,  on  the  whole,  are  limited  to  one  organ,  although  different 


482  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

organs,  such  as  liver  and  kidney,  may  have  certain  receptors  in  common;  in 
this  respect  the  blood-group  differentials  resemble  the  organismal  differen- 
tials. 

From  what  has  been  stated,  it  follows  that  by  means  of  the  four  primary 
blood  groups  it  is  not  possible,  as  a  rule,  to  differentiate  one  individual  from 
another,  nor  to  indicate  the  degree  of  relationship  between  individuals.  The 
behavior  of  transplanted  tissues,  on  the  other  hand,  does  show  not  only  the 
distinctiveness,  but  also  the  relationship  of  individuals  in  an  approximately 
quantitative  manner.  All  degrees  of  relationship  are  revealed  by  transplanta- 
tion. This  difference  between  the  factors  determining  the  results  of  transplan- 
tation and  the  differentials  of  blood  groups  among  individuals  belonging  to 
the  same,  as  well  as  to  different  species,  is  also  emphasized  by  the  lack  of 
parallelism  between  the  results  of  transplantation  and  blood-grouping.  We 
have  seen  previously  that  the  results  of  skin  transplantation  among  human 
beings  are  not  noticeably  influenced  by  the  blood  groups  to  which  these 
individuals  belong.  In  animals  transplantation  reveals  individual  differences, 
although  blood-group  differences  may  be  lacking  here  altogether.  Furthermore, 
the  presence  of  similar  group  differentials  in  different  species  of  animals  does 
not  affect  noticeably  the  severity  of  the  reaction  following  heterotransplanta- 
tion in  these  species. 

What  applies  to  the  relations  between  the  organismal  differentials,  as  ana- 
lysed by  means  of  transplantation,  and  the  human  blood  groups  applies  also, 
and  to  a  still  greater  extent,  to  the  relations  between  the  heterogenetic  dif- 
ferentials of  Forssman  and  the  organismal  differentials.  The  Forssman  differ- 
entials are  in  some  respects  the  opposites  of  the  organismal  differentials ;  the 
latter  correspond  to  and  express  the  systematic  relationship  of  organisms, 
whereas  the  Forssman  differentials  disregard  these  relationships;  as  stated 
they  are  factors  held  in  common  by  the  most  varied  and  often  distant  kinds  of 
organisms,  without  regard  to  systematic  relationship.  We  may,  perhaps,  com- 
pare them  in  part  with  certain  pigments  which  are  present  in  the  epidermis  of 
the  most  varied  species,  without  reference  to  their  systematic  position. 

In  many  species  of  animals  there  occur  in  the  blood  corpuscles,  species- 
specific  agglutinogens,  and  in  the  blood  serum,  species-specific  agglutinins, 
which  latter  cause  agglutination  of  the  blood  corpuscles  of  foreign  species, 
without  reference  to  the  blood-group  to  which  they  may  belong.  Inasmuch  as 
these  agglutinins  are  directed  against  heterogenous  species,  they  are  called 
heteroagglutinins ;  they  are  not,  at  least  in  some  cases,  experimentally  or 
accidentally  produced  immune  substances,  but  are  preformed  substances. 
At  present  it  is  not  possible  to  establish  a  direct  relationship  between  pre- 
formed heteroagglutinins  and  the  organismal  differentials,  except  that  in 
some  cases,  when  two  species  are  relatively  nearly  related,  heteroagglutinins 
seem  to  be  lacking,  as  in  the  case  of  rat  and  mouse,  or  of  buffalo  and  cattle ; 
however,  human  serum  may  contain  heteroagglutinins  for  the  erythrocytes 
of  nearly  related  anthropoid  apes.  In  addition,  there  may  occur  in  the  serum 
of  these  species,  hemolysins  which  are  similar.  Distinct  from  these  preformed 
heteroagglutinins  in  the  sera  of  various  animal  species  are  immune  agglutinins 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  483 

and  hemolysins,  which  may  be  produced  by  injection  of  red  corpuscles  of  one 
species  into  a  strange  species.  These  immune  agglutinins  and  hemolysins  also 
possess  a  species-specific  character;  the  presence  of  such  species-specific  sub- 
stances may  obscure  the  existence  of  the  group  differentials,  and  in  the  case 
of  immune  agglutinins  which  are  directed  against  human  erythrocytes  it  may 
be  necessary  first  to  absorb  the  species-specific  heteroagglutinins  by  human 
corpuscles  of  Group  I,  which  possess  neither  the  A  nor  the  B  group  differen- 
tials, if  a  test  is  to  be  made  of  the  presence  of  group  agglutinins  in  this  serum. 

There  exist,  then,  marked  differences  between  the  individuality  differentials 
demonstrable  by  means  of  transplantation  and  the  differentials  of  the  four 
primary  blood  groups.  It  seems  that  it  was  the  proof  that  very  fine  differences 
between  individual  constitutions  can  be  established  by  means  of  transplanta- 
tion which  led  immunologists  to  seek  likewise  for  methods  making  possible 
finer  differentiations  between  individuals  by  means  of  blood  grouping.  Ac- 
cordingly, in  recent  years,  by  the  use  of  immune  agglutinins  in  addition  to 
the  natural  blood-group  agglutinins,  Landsteiner  succeeded  in  adding  new 
groups  to  the  four  primary  blood  groups.  Thus  within  the  Group  A,  Land- 
steiner distinguished  between  two  subgroups,  Ax  and  A2 ;  these  differ  in  the 
way  they  unite  with  two  subagglutinins;  alpha!  and  alpha2.  In  a  somewhat 
related  way  Thomsen  distinguished  between  the  original  Group  A  and  the 
subgroup  of  the  latter,  Ax.  Ax  corpuscles  are  less  intensely  agglutinated  by 
antisera  than  are  the  typical  A  corpuscles.  Thomsen  thus  adds  to  the  differen- 
tials A,  B  and  A+B,  a  fourth  one,  Ax.  To  these  subgroups  correspond  sub- 
groups among  the  agglutinins  of  the  normal  human  sera. 

Also,  the  B  differential  in  human  erythrocytes  has  recently  been  further 
differentiated  into  a  Bx  component,  which  so  far  seems  to  be  peculiar  to  human 
cells,  and  into  B2  and  B3,  which  occur,  besides,  in  the  blood  corpuscles  of 
certain  animals,  such  as  the  rabbit.  Correspondingly,  anti-B  of  human  sera 
may  contain  a  mixture  of  anti-Bx  and  anti-B2;  however,  not  all  human  sera 
contain  the  anti-B!  component. 

In  addition,  Landsteiner  and  his  associates  established  three  further  sub- 
groups carrying  the  agglutinogens  M,  N  and  P,  respectively.  No  preformed 
agglutinins  corresponding  to  the  agglutinins  M  and  N  exist  in  normal  human 
sera,  but  they  can  be  produced  through  immunization  of  rabbits  with  these 
antigens.  Moreover,  in  contradistinction  to  the  primary  blood-group  antigens, 
M  and  N  have  not  been  found  in  cells  other  than  the  erythrocytes.  These 
additional  agglutinogens  occur  probably  in  all  of  the  four  primary  blood 
groups  and  they,  together  with  the  ordinary  blood  groups  and  subgroups  Ax 
and  A2  differentials,  make  possible  the  differentiation  between  thirty-six 
classes  of  individuals.  In  this  way  the  ability  to  differentiate  between  different 
individuals  is  much  increased. 

More  recently,  Schiff,  through  immunization  of  a  sheep  with  the  blood  of  a 
person  belonging  to  Group  O  and  possessing  M,  N  and  P  differentials,  estab- 
lished the  existence  of  still  another  differential  in  human  corpuscles,  which 
he  designates  as  H,  and  which  may  be  present  in  any  of  the  four  primary 
human  blood  groups ;  it  seems  to  be  transmitted  to  the  offspring  by  means  of 


484  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

a  single  dominant  gene.  Thus  seventy-two  classes  of  individuals  can  now 
be  distinguished  if  one  considers  all  these  factors,  and  there  is  little  doubt  that 
the  number  of  such  differentials  could  be  increased  still  further.  Still  more 
recently,  the  agglutinogen  Rh,  which  is  common  to  man  and  the  Rhesus  mon- 
key, has  been  added  to  the  list  of  blood-group  antigens. 

Notwithstanding  the  possibility  of  finer  differentiations  of  individuals  by 
such  means,  these  blood-group  differentials  are  not  identical  with  the  in- 
dividuality differentials,  according  to  the  evidence  which  is  available  at  the 
present  time.  The  fact  that  two  individuals  belong  to  the  same  primary  blood 
group  does  not  seem  to  have  any  relation  to  the  reaction  which  takes  place  if  a 
piece  of  skin  is  transplanted  from  the  one  to  the  other.  Furthermore,  inasmuch 
as  Aj  and  A2  represent  subgroups  of  A,  the  same  objection  applies  to  the 
identification  of  these  subgroups  with  the  individuality  differentials  as  to  the 
primary  group  A.  In  regard  to  the  M,  N  and  P  differentials,  they  are  appar- 
ently inherited  in  a  similar  manner  to  the  four  primary  blood  groups ;  neither 
they  nor  H,  as  such,  would  make  possible  a  differentiation  between  different 
individuals.  But  even  if  it  should  be  possible  to  distinguish  individuals  by 
means  of  these  additional  blood  groups,  it  has  not  been  shown  that  the  mode 
of  distribution  of  blood-group  differentials  among  the  different  individuals 
corresponds  to  their  degree  of  relationship,  and  even  if  contrary  to  expectation 
there  should  be  found  such  a  parallelism,  it  would  still  remain  improbable 
that  these  differentials  are  identical  with  the  individuality  differentials  so 
generally  found  among  all  kinds  of  species  and  animals,  including  those  in 
which  these  particular  blood-group  differentials  are  lacking. 

In  addition  to  the  secondary  blood  group  or  subgroup  differentials,  there 
occur  other  unusual  agglutinogens  and  agglutinins  in  the  blood  of  various 
individuals,  or  in  certain  classes  of  individuals.  Several  authors — Guthrie 
and  Huck,  Ottenberg  and  Johnson,  and  others — have  already  drawn  attention 
to  such  occurrences.  Thus  it  seems  that  especially  in  cases  of  insanity  abnormal 
agglutination  reactions  have  been  observed.  Furthermore,  if  the  union  between 
agglutinogen  and  agglutinin  takes  place  at  a  low  temperature,  abnormal  ag- 
glutinations may  result,  which  are  not  found  at  ordinary  temperature.  Other 
complications  are  due  to  an  apparent  linkage  which  has  been  noted  between 
certain  types  of  agglutinogens  or  agglutinins.  Thus  an  agglutinin  for  A2 
usually  causes  an  agglutination  also  of  blood  corpuscles  which  belong  to 
the  primary  blood  group  I,  possessing  neither  A  nor  B.  Agglutinin  alphax  of 
human  sera  from  groups  I  and  III  can  be  removed  by  blood  cells  of  Group  A, 
which  lack  the  Ax  receptor.  It  is  possible  that  with  the  agglutinogens  N  and 
P,  there  may  be  associated  other  agglutinogens  which  increase  the  agglutina- 
tion effect  normally  produced  by  the  union  of  N  and  P  and  their  respective 
agglutinins ;  perhaps  anti-human  species  agglutinins  may  be  active  in  anti-N 
or  anti-P  rabbit  immune  sera  and  cause  agglutination  in  addition  to  the 
specific  agglutination  of  the  N  and  P  corpuscles.  Agglutinins  for  human  P 
agglutinogen  have  been  observed  also  in  sera  of  horses,  hogs  and  rabbits.  An- 
other indication  of  the  complexity  of  this  mosaic  of  antigens  is  the  existence 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  485 

of  a  common  partial  antigen  in  human  corpuscles,  and  in  other  cells,  without 
respect  to  the  group  to  which  they  belong,  as  well  as  in  certain  Shiga  bacilli ; 
and  in  the  latter,  in  addition,  the  Forssman  antigen  is  present.  There  are  a 
number  of  other  differentials  which  are  found  in  cells  of  various  species, 
irrespective  of  their  systematic  relationship.  Thus  human  corpuscles  of  Group 
A  have  a  certain  factor  in  common  with  erythrocytes  of  hog,  sheep  and  cattle. 
Besides,  common  differentials  are  present  in  hog  erythrocytes  and  in  the 
erythrocytes  of  man,  regardless  of  the  blood-grouping  of  the  latter.  There  are 
known  still  other  differentials,  which  different,  not  phylogenetically  related, 
species  have  in  common,  and  in  all  probability  a  still  larger  number,  unknown 
as  yet,  could  be  added  to  those  which  have  so  far  been  established. 

All  these  observations  exclude  the  possibility  of  identification  of  these 
agglutinable  factors  with  organismal  differentials,  but  not  the  possibility  that 
these  various  factors,  or  some  of  them,  may  be  present  among  the  individuality 
differentials,  or,  rather,  that  the  genes  representing  these  factors  may  be  a 
component  part  of  the  gene  sets  which  determine  the  individuality  differentials. 
This  conclusion  holds  good  even  if  it  should  be  feasible  to  distinguish  all 
individuals  by  a  study  of  their  blood-group  antigens.  If  we  consider  that 
besides  the  differences  already  established  between  human  corpuscles,  or 
between  the  blood  sera  of  human  groups,  and  of  certain  individuals  in  these 
groups,  additional  differences  might  be  discovered  between  the  red  corpuscles 
of  individuals  if  their  reactions  with  different  animal  sera  were  studied,  then 
we  can  conceive  the  possibility  that,  as  Landsteiner  suggests,  in  this  way  the 
corpuscles  of  all,  or  at  least  a  large  number  of  individuals,  might  be  identified 
and  distinguished  from  one  another.  Yet,  as  stated,  it  would  not  follow  there- 
fore that  the  sum  of  these  factors  constitutes  the  individuality  differential. 
This  would  require  that  there  should  be  found  the  same  graded  relationship 
between  these  regular  or  irregular,  often  heterogenous  group  differentials 
and  the  genetic  constitution  of  individuals,  as  can  be  shown  to  exist  in  the 
case  of  the  individuality  differentials.  That  an  individual  can  be  distinguished 
from  other  individuals  by  means  of  certain  characteristics  does  not,  by  itself, 
prove  that  these  characters  represent  the  individuality  differentials.  We  may 
be  able  to  identify  an  individual  by  means  of  the  combination  of  certain 
characteristics  which  are  a  part  of  the  Mendelian  mosaic  of  this  individual, 
or  even  by  a  single  characteristic  belonging  to  the  Mendelian  mosaic.  It  is  the 
organismal  differentials  which  determine  the  graded  compatibility  in  the 
biological  sense  between  two  organisms,  and  especially  between  two  individ- 
uals of  the  same  species  or  race,  whereas  the  blood  groups  and  the  immune 
reactions  based  on  such  group  differentials,  which  may  be  common  to  man 
and  nearly,  or  even  more  distantly,  related  species  of  animals,  do  not  exert 
this  function  as  far  as  known  at  the  present  time.  We  have  discussed  these 
problems  already  in  a  preceding  chapter,  where  we  considered  the  relation 
between  natural  and  experimentally  produced  immune  hemolysins  in  cattle 
and  fowl  and  organismal  differentials,  and  we  concluded  that  certain  relations 
may  exist  between  these  types  of  substances.  However,  it  may  be  assumed  that 


486  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  greater  the  number  of  additional  antigens  which  will  be  found  in  the 
erythrocytes,  the  less  will  be  the  difference  remaining  between  the  totality  of 
these  antigens  in  the  erythrocytes  and  in  the  individuality  differentials. 

Investigations  as  to  the  distribution  of  blood  groups  in  different  human 
races  we  owe  especially  to  Hirszfeld  and  his  collaborators.  In  general,  it  may 
be  stated  that  the  different  primary  blood  groups  are  found  in  all  races,  but 
the  frequency  with  which  the  different  groups  occur  differs  in  different  popu- 
lations and  races.  In  general,  in  Western  Europe  A  predominates ;  the  farther 
we  progress  in  the  direction  of  India,  the  greater  the  frequency  of  B.  In 
certain  more  primitive  races,  such  as  the  American  Indian  and  the  Eskimo, 
O  is  the  most  common  blood  group ;  but  among  the  Black  Feet  Indians,  Mat- 
son  and  Schrader  found  a  marked  preponderance  of  Group  A.  As  a  rule, 
among  whites  and  negroes  a  certain  agglutinogen  may  occur  with  varying 
frequency. 

From  these  facts  it  may  be  concluded  that  the  differences  even  between 
supposedly  pure  races  are  essentially  statistical  as  far  as  their  blood-group 
differentials  are  concerned.  On  the  other  hand,  as  stated  above,  different 
species  may  possess  the  same  kinds  of  blood  groups.  Conditions  are  different 
in  transplantation.  Here  a  large  number  of  very  fine  gradations  in  reactions 
occurs  in  accordance  with  the  relationship  of  donor  and  host.  If  we  compare, 
for  instance,  the  results  of  transplantations  of  thyroid  from  rat  to  mouse, 
or  of  the  reciprocal  transplantations,  with  those  of  syngenesio-  and  homoio- 
transplantations  in  rats,  we  do  not  find  in  the  former,  in  a  single  instance,  the 
excellent  state  of  preservation  of  the  thyroid  transplant  which  may  be  ob- 
served in  a  favorable  syngenesiotransplantation  from  rat  to  rat ;  we  have  here 
to  deal  with  absolute  differences  in  the  distribution  of  a  large  number  of 
factors,  not  merely  with  statistical  differences  in  the  distribution  of  a  limited 
number  of  factors  as  in  the  case  of  the  four  blood  groups.  In  homoio-  and 
inter-racial  transplantations  we  may  find  an  overlapping  of  the  results;  but 
the  most  favorable  ones  obtained  in  some  syngenesiotransplantations  are  not 
observed  in  inter-racial  transplantations ;  the  differences  in  the  results  of  dif- 
ferent kinds  of  transplantation  are  therefore  not  merely  of  a  statistical  nature, 
such  as  those  obtained  in  comparing  the  blood  groups  in  different  populations. 

In  order  to  analyze  further  the  relations  between  blood-group  differentials 
and  organismal  differentials,  we  shall  consider  the  occurrence  of  the  former 
in  the  cells  and  of  agglutinins  in  the  blood  serum  in  different  species  of  ani- 
mals. However,  some  of  the  evidence  concerning  this  subject  is  still  contra- 
dictory and  the  data  on  hand  must,  therefore,  be  used  with  caution. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  in  certain  anthropoid  apes,  as  Landsteiner  and 
Miller  have  shown,  there  are  group  differentials  which  are  identical  with  those 
in  man.  Thus  A  and  O  corpuscles  occur  in  chimpanzees,  and  A,  B  and  AB 
corpuscles  in  orang-utangs.  In  a  Gibbon,  A  corpuscles  were  found.  In  the 
blood  serum  of  these  species  there  are  present  agglutinins  which  react  with 
those  differentials  not  present  in  their  own  erythrocytes.  The  agglutinogens 
and  agglutinins  in  these  anthropoid  apes  behave  exactly  like  the  corresponding 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  487 

human  group  differentials  and  agglutinins.  This  relationship  of  the  group 
differentials  corresponds  to  the  close  relationship  existing  between  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials  of  man  and  these  apes.  However,  notwithstanding  the 
identity  of  group  differentials  in  these  organisms,  a  very  marked  difference 
exists  as  far  as  the  organismal  differentials  in  man  and  anthropoid  apes  are 
concerned.  Injection  of  human  red  corpuscles  into  chimpanzees  leads  to  the 
production  of  species-specific  antibodies,  which  allow  the  differentiation  be- 
tween human  and  chimpanzee  blood  (Landsteiner  and  Levine),  although 
both  of  these  may  possess  the  same  blood-group  differentials.  This  fact  again 
demonstrates  the  distinction  between  organismal  and  the  original  blood-group 
differentials.  The  combination  of  blood-group  antigens  M  and  N  has  been  de- 
tected so  far  only  in  the  blood  of  primates,  but  the  M  differential  seems  to 
occur  also  in  the  Macacus  Rhesus  erythrocytes. 

If  we  turn  to  the  lower  monkeys,  Landsteiner  and  Miller  found  among 
Old  World  monkeys  no  blood-group  differentials  which  correspond  to  human 
isoagglutinogens,  while  New  World  monkeys,  which  are  less  nearly  related  to 
anthropoids  than  Old  World  monkeys,  have  a  differential  analogous  to  human 
differential  B,  although  B  of  man  and  monkey  are  not  identical  in  this  instance. 
Among  the  Old  World  monkeys  it  is  especially  Macacus  Rhesus  that  has  been 
studied  very  extensively.  According  to  Buchbinder,  the  erythrocytes  of 
Macacus  do  not  possess  a  differential  corresponding  to  the  human  blood-group 
differentials,  but  in  the  blood  serum  of  this  species  there  is  found  the  iso- 
agglutinin  alpha,  which  agglutinates  human  corpuscles  A.  However,  more 
recently  it  has  been  observed  that  antigen  Rh  is  common  to  human  and 
Macacus  Rhesus  erythrocytes.  No  Forssman  differential  exists  in  Macacus 
erythrocytes  or  kidney,  but  there  is  a  hemolysin  for  sheep  corpuscles  in 
Macacus  serum ;  however,  this  hemolysin  seems  not  to  behave  in  the  ex- 
pected way  towards  the  corpuscles  of  other  species  which  contain  Forssman 
differentials.  Macacus  erythrocytes  do  not  contain  blood-group  differentials 
A  and  B,  and  no  classification  of  Macacus  blood  into  groups  is  possible.  As 
Eisler  has  found,  human  corpuscles  have  also  a  differential  distinct  from  the 
Forssman  differential,  in  common  with  Shiga  bacilli. 

We  see,  then,  that  to  a  certain  extent  the  blood-group  distribution  is  con- 
nected with  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  animals ;  the  anthropoid  apes  have 
blood  groups  more  similar  to  those  of  man  than  the  lower  monkeys  and  other 
animals.  However,  this  is  a  condition  which  is  not  restricted  to  blood  groups, 
but  which  is  observed  likewise  in  other  organ  characteristics ;  thus  the  shape 
of  the  skull  and  brain,  and  many  other  features,  are  in  apes,  more  similar  to 
those  of  man  than  are  those  of  other  animals.  On  the  other  hand,  this  paral- 
lelism between  relationship  and  blood-group  distribution  is  not  general  and, 
moreover,  we  find  quite  similar  characters  shown  equally  by  very  diverse 
organisms,  without  respect  to  their  relationship. 

The  investigations  in  apes  and  monkeys  were  preceded  by  those  concerning 
the  blood  groups  in  other  mammals.  At  first  the  same  methods  which  had  led 
to  their  establishment  in  man  were  used  also  in  the  case  of  various  animal 


488  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

blood  corpuscles  and  sera.  Employing  these  methods  Hektoen  obtained  nega- 
tive results,  but  von  Dungern  and  Hirszfeld  reported  some  which  were  posi- 
tive, although  the  reactions  in  these  animals  were  weaker  and  more  irregular 
than  in  man.  The  conclusions  became  more  definite  when  not  only  blood 
corpuscles  and  sera  from  individuals  belonging  to  a  certain  species  of  animals 
were  compared,  but  when,  in  addition,  the  interactions  between  sera  and 
blood  corpuscles  of  these  animals  with  the  well  defined  human  agglutinogens 
and  agglutinins  were  studied ;  and  furthermore,  when  use  was  made  of  im- 
mune sera,  obtained  in  rabbits  by  injection  of  human  or  animal  blood  cor- 
puscles, and  when  comparative  absorptions  of  the  antibodies,  present  in  the 
immune  sera,  by  human  as  well  as  by  animal  erythrocytes  or  their  alcohol 
extracts  were  also  considered.  By  these  means  the  identity  of  certain  group 
agglutinogens  in  human  erythrocytes  and  in  the  erythrocytes  of  more  remote 
animal  species  has  apparently  been  demonstrated,  as  well  as  the  identity  of 
certain  agglutinins  in  animal  and  human  sera,  while  other  blood-group  dif- 
ferentials and  agglutinins  have  been  found  to  be  limited  to  man  or  to  various 
species  of  animals. 

However,  in  some  instances  it  has  been  possible  to  establish  the  presence 
of  blood  groups  in  animal  species  by  the  same  methods  which  have  been  used 
for  this  purpose  in  man.  Thus  Hirszfeld  and  Przesmycki,  and  also  Schermer 
and  Hofferber,  have  shown  that  in  the  horse  four  groups  exist,  which  are 
analogous  to  those  in  man,  namely,  O-alpha,  beta,  A-beta,  B-alpha,  and  AB-oo. 
The  similarity  between  the  blood  groups  of  man  and  horse  goes  still  further. 
Thus  in  both  of  these  species,  analogous  subgroups  Ax  and  A2,  and  two 
agglutinins,  alphax  and  alpha2,  can  be  recognized ;  in  both  instances  the  differ- 
ences between  these  subgroups  are  presumably  of  a  quantitative  rather  than 
a  qualitative  character.  Furthermore,  in  addition  to  the  primary  four  blood 
groups,  four  additional  blood  groups,  X,  Y,  Z  and  N,  comparable  to  the 
additional  blood  groups  M,  N,  P  and  H  in  man,  are  demonstrable  in  horses 
(Schermer  and  Kaempffer). 

Similarly,  by  means  of  injections  of  rabbits  with  the  erythrocytes  from  other 
rabbits,  Fischer  and  Klinckhard  prepared  immune  sera  which  agglutinated 
blood  corpuscles  from  certain  groups  of  rabbits.  They  believed  they  were 
able  in  this  way  to  establish  the  existence  of  two  agglutinogens  and  two  ag- 
glutinins, and  they  divided  therefore  these  animals  into  four  groups,  corre- 
sponding to  the  four  groups  found  in  man,  although  neither  agglutinogens  nor 
agglutinins  were  identical  with  those  of  man.  However,  Levine  and  Land- 
steiner,  by  immunizing  rabbits  with  the  hemolyzed  blood  corpuscles  of  other 
rabbits,  obtained  a  larger  number  of  agglutinins,  and  they  assume  therefore 
the  occurrence  of  individual  blood  differences  in  rabbits  similar  to  those  which 
have  been  established  in  goats,  cattle  and  chickens,  and  which  we  shall  discuss 
in  a  subsequent  chapter.  But  there  occurs  in  certain  rabbits  a  condition  which 
differs  from  the  usual  findings  in  man  and  in  other  animals.  There  may  be 
observed  in  these  particular  animals  a  peculiar  distribution  of  the  A  differen- 
tial ;  it  is  lacking  in  their  erythrocytes  but  is  present  in  their  organs,  and  some 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  489 

of  this  substance  may  pass  from  the  organs  into  the  serum.  In  those  rabbits 
which  contain  the  A  differential,  the  anti-A  agglutinin  is  lacking  in  the  serum ; 
on  the  other  hand,  the  anti-A  agglutinin  can  be  demonstrated  in  the  serum  of 
those  individuals  in  which  the  A  differential  is  not  present  in  their  organs 
(W.  Treibman).  The  latter  type  of  animals  can  be  immunized  against  the 
human  A  differential,  which  is  strange  to  them ;  while  the  former  type,  which 
possesses  the  differential,  cannot  thus  be  immunized.  These  observations 
indicate  very  strongly  that  the  A  differential  occurring  in  the  organs  and 
serum  of  certain  individual  rabbits,  is  essentially  the  same  as  that  occurring  in 
the  erythrocytes  of  man. 

In  a  corresponding  manner,  according  to  Hirszfeld  and  Halber  (1928),  the 
isoagglutinable  substance  of  sheep  and  hog  is  serologically  identical  with  the 
isoagglutinable  substance  A  of  human  blood.  The  isoagglutinable  blood  cor- 
puscles of  certain  sheep  and  hogs  absorb  all  the  anti-serum  A  antibodies 
obtained  through  immunization,  whereas  the  non-agglutinable  blood  cor- 
puscles of  other  sheep  and  hogs  do  not  possess  this  property.  Therefore,  ac- 
cording to  these  investigators,  we  must  conclude  that  sheep  and  hogs  actually 
possess  an  A  differential  identical  with  that  of  man. 

Still,  certain  differences  seem  to  exist  between  the  A  differential  in  human 
corpuscles  of  blood-group  II  and  in  those  sheep  corpuscles  which  also  possess 
A.  While  by  means  of  absorption  with  A-containing  sheep  corpuscles  it  is 
possible  to  absorb  more  antibodies  from  the  serum  of  rabbits  immunized 
against  the  human  A  differential,  than  by  using  for  this  purpose  sheep  cor- 
puscles which  do  not  contain  the  A  differential,  on  the  other  hand,  if  the 
sera  of  rabbits  immunized  against  A-containing  sheep  corpuscles  are  absorbed 
with  A  sheep  corpuscles,  then  all  antibodies  against  the  A  differential  of 
sheep  corpuscles  are  entirely  removed,  but  only  a  part  of  the  antibodies  against 
human  corpuscles  of  group  A  is  removed.  Similarly,  from  serum  of  rabbits 
immunized  against  human  differential  A,  the  antibody  against  the  A  differen- 
tial of  sheep  corpuscles  can  be  entirely  removed  through  absorption  with 
sheep  corpuscles  containing  A,  but  there  remains,  then,  still  a  reaction  against 
an  alcohol  extract  from  human  A  corpuscles.  These  observations  have  led  to 
the  conclusion  that  there  exists  not  a  complete,  but  only  a  partial  identity 
between  the  A  differential  in  the  erythrocytes  of  man  and  of  sheep;  but  we 
may  possibly  have  to  deal  merely  with  quantitative  differences  between  the 
A  differential  as  it  occurs  in  man  and  in  certain  animal  species. 

While  no  isoagglutinable  substance  was  found  by  direct  test  in  Polish 
cattle,  indirectly  a  grouping  could  be  demonstrated  in  these  cattle  erythrocytes. 
Cattle  and  sheep  corpuscles  have  a  receptor  in  common,  as  is  shown  by  the 
fact  that  the  amboceptor  in  the  serum  of  rabbits  immunized  against  sheep 
corpuscles  hemolyzes  not  only  sheep  but  also  cattle  corpuscles,  whereas  the 
anti-Forssman  serum,  obtained  through  injection  of  guinea  pig  kidney  into 
rabbit,  which  also  hemolyzes  sheep  corpuscles,  does  not  affect  cattle  corpuscles. 
Therefore  the  antigen  in  sheep  corpuscles  which  gives  rise  to  the  formation 
of  antibodies  able  to  act  on  certain  cattle  corpuscles,  is  not  identical  with  the 


490  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Forssman  differential,  which  likewise  occurs  in  sheep  corpuscles.  But  the 
antigen  common  to  sheep  and  cattle  corpuscles  which  gives  rise  to  this 
hemolytic  amboceptor  is  not  possessed  by  all  cattle,  but  only  by  some  indi- 
viduals. Thus  the  presence  of  groups  can  be  demonstrated  also  in  the  case  of 
cattle  corpuscles.  Cattle  contain  Bx  and  B2  receptors.  Bx  is  the  differential  of 
those  blood  corpuscles  which  are  not  hemolyzed  by  anti-sheep-rabbit  serum, 
while  B2  cattle  corpuscles  are  hemolyzed  by  anti-sheep-rabbit  serum. 

In  general,  in  lower  animals  the  agglutinogen  B  apparently  is  more  fre- 
quent than  A.  Thus  in  the  dog,  in  the  rabbit,  and,  as  mentioned  above,  also 
in  New  World  monkeys,  B  is  .present,  and  correspondingly  the  agglutinin 
alpha  is  found  in  the  serum  of  such  individuals ;  also  in  the  guinea  pig  a  very 
weak  B  has  been  noted.  More  recently  the  occurrence  of  B  differentials  in 
erythrocytes  and  of  anti-B  in  sera  has  been  further  analyzed  by  Friedenreich 
and  With.  It  was  found  that  among  the  B  differentials,  different  subgroups  can 
be  distinguished,  namely  Bx,  B2  and  B3.  The  separation  of  these  fractions  was 
accomplished  by  means  of  absorptions  of  normal  human  and  animal  sera  by 
human  B  corpuscles,  as  well  as  by  B  corpuscles  from  various  animal  species. 
Rabbit  corpuscles  were  observed  to  contain  B2  and  B3  differentials,  but  not 
Blf  which  is  peculiar  to  man.  The  guinea  pig  erythrocyte  has  a  weak  B  dif- 
ferential ;  also,  dog,  rat  and  hog  have  B  components.  The  same  facts  apply  to 
cattle,  sheep  and  goats,  although  their  erythrocytes  are  not  agglutinated  by 
anti-B  serum.  In  conformity  with  the  lack  of  Bx  in  the  erythrocytes  of  these 
various  species,  the  sera  of  the  latter  possess  anti-Bx  substance ;  only  the 
chicken  serum  shows  anti-B  substance,  and  correspondingly,  the  chicken 
erythrocytes  are  free  of  the  B  differential.  That  different  kinds  of  B  differen- 
tial may  be  distinguished  explains  also  the  occurrence,  in  some  species,  of  B 
in  the  red  blood  corpuscles  and  of  agglutinin  beta  in  the  serum  of  the  same 
individual ;  in  such  cases,  B  and  beta  represent  different  fractions,  as  for  in- 
stance, B2  in  the  corpuscles  and  anti-Bx  in  the  serum.  In  this  way  auto- 
agglutination  would  be  avoided. 

In  Polish  chickens  the  sera  of  many  individuals  strongly  agglutinate  hu- 
man erythrocytes  O  and  B,  but  not  A.  Conversely,  according  to  Karshner, 
human  serum  belonging  to  blood-group  B-alpha  gives  the  greatest  number  of 
positive  agglutinations  with  chicken  erythrocytes,  while  human  sera  of  blood- 
group  A,  containing  anti-B  agglutinin,  give  the  least.  Dunn  and  Landsteiner, 
by  means  of  anti-chicken-rabbit  sera  found  in  several  chicken  families  an 
agglutinogen,  the  hereditary  transmission  of  which  was  apparently  deter- 
mined by  a  single  dominant  gene.  Karshner,  by  means  of  isoagglutination 
reactions,  distinguished  three  blood  groups  in  chickens,  the  largest  group 
consisting  of  individuals  in  which  neither  agglutinogens  nor  agglutinins 
could  be  demonstrated.  On  the  other  hand,  Shimidzu  did  not  find  that  the 
weak  isoagglutinations  which  occur  in  chickens  permit  the  differentiation  of 
different  groups.  However,  if  the  agglutination  of  the  erythrocytes  of  in- 
dividual chickens  is  tested  with  rabbit-anti-chicken  immune  sera'  or  with 
various  heterogenous  sera,  individual  differences  in  the  majority  of  all  in- 
dividuals examined  could  be  found.  Such  experiments  were  carried  out  by 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  491 

Landsteiner,  Miller  and  Levine,  and  we  shall  refer  to  them  again  in  a  later 
chapter,  where  we  shall  discuss  the  use  of  serological  methods  in  the  estab- 
lishment of  individual  differences  in  several  species  of  animals. 

Various  phases  may  be  distinguished  in  these  investigations  into  the  oc- 
currence of  blood-group  differentials  and  agglutinins  in  human  and  animal 
cells  and  sera.  At  first  it  appeared  as  though  the  blood-group  differentials  in 
man  and  in  certain  animals  were  identical ;  then  certain  differences  were 
found  and  doubts  arose  as  to  whether  the  identity  was  complete.  Thus  von 
Dungern  and  Hirszfeld  observed  that  human  beta  sera  are  not  only  absorbed 
by  human  B  corpuscles,  but  also  by  B  corpuscles  of  various  animal  species. 
But  subsequently  it  was  discovered  that  the  beta  agglutinin  of  these  animal 
sera  cannot  be  absorbed  in  a  corresponding  manner  by  B  human  and  animal 
corpuscles.  Moreover,  from  human  anti-B  immune  rabbit  serum  only  B  of 
human  origin  and  B  from  some  anthropoid  apes  can  absorb  the  B  agglutinin ; 
whereas  the  B  corpuscles  from  other  animal  species  cannot  do  so.  Further 
investigations  made  it  then  very  probable  that  the  agglutinogens  A  and  B 
can  be  subdivided  into  various  fractions  and  that,  correspondingly,  the  dif- 
ferent serum  agglutinins  can  be  subdivided ;  also,  that  certain  of  these  second- 
ary differentials  may  be  common  to  human  blood  and  that  of  various  animal 
species,  while  others  are  peculiar  to  single  species.  The  question  now  arises 
as  to  how  far  it  is  possible  to  proceed  with  this  process  of  subdividing  cor- 
puscles and  sera;  it  is  not  improbable  that  by  increasing  the  number  of  tests 
between  corpuscles  and  sera  of  man  and  those  of  different  types  of  immune 
sera  against  a  greater  variety  of  blood  corpuscles,  employing  other  species 
than  the  rabbit  as  donor  of  the  immune  sera,  the  number  of  subdivisions 
may  be  still  further  augmented.  In  addition  the  question  suggests  itself  as  to 
whether  experiments  of  this  type  actually  prove  the  existence  of  multiple 
differentials  and  agglutinins,  or  whether  we  have  to  deal  merely  with  quantita- 
tive differences  in  the  strength  of  different  differentials  and  agglutinins  and 
with  the  presence  of  substances  which  may  interfere  with  the  absorption 
processes  in  different  types  of  blood. 

We  have  seen,  then,  that  various  species  of  animals,  including  the  human 
species,  have  certain  differentials  in  common,  without  regard  to  the  relation- 
ship of  these  species.  In  addition,  a  connection  has  been  established  between 
blood-group  differentials  and  differentials  of  different  kinds.  Thus  a  relation 
has  been  noted  between  the  human  blood-group  differential  A  and  the 
Forssman  differential  of  sheep  erythrocytes,  guinea  pig  kidney,  and  certain 
cells  of  other  heterogenetic  species,  and  even  of  some  bacteria.  Schiff  and 
Adelsberger  first  found  that  through  immunization  of  rabbits  with  human 
erythrocytes  A,  hemolysins  for  sheep  corpuscles  are  produced,  as  well  as  im- 
mune agglutinins  for  the  human  corpuscles  of  Group  A.  As  to  whether  dif- 
ferential A  and  the  Forssman  differential  are  identical,  or  whether  they  occur 
side  by  side  in  the  same  human  corpuscles,  it  seems,  according  to  investiga- 
tions of  Sachs  and  Witebsky,  that  the  second  alternative  holds  good.  It  can 
be  shown  that  some  sheep  corpuscles  which  possess  Forssman  antigen — as 
well  as  other  sheep  corpuscles  which  do  not  possess  it — have  no  human  A 


492  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

antigen ;  they  absorb  only  traces  of  the  human  anti-A  substance  preformed  in 
human  serum.  This  indicates  that  the  Forssman  differential  and  the  human 
A  differential  are  not  identical. 

In  anti-human  A  rabbit  immune  serum  which,  as  stated,  contains  also 
Forssman  antibodies,  it  is  possible  to  remove  the  latter  by  absorption  with 
sheep  corpuscles  which  contain  the  Forssman  differential  but  do  not  contain 
the  human  A  differential;  at  the  same  time  the  ability  of  the  immune  serum 
to  react  with  alcohol  extract  from  human  corpuscles  A  is  also  diminished 
by  the  removal  of  the  Forssman  antibodies.  Forssman  antibodies  and  anti- 
bodies against  human  A  differentials  are  perhaps  in  some  loose  manner  linked, 
and  a  certain  constituent  of  the  Forssman  differential  may  occur  in  human 
corpuscles  belonging  to  group  A.  However,  it  may  also  be  that  the  common 
reactions  of  group  A  and  Forssman  differentials  depend  merely  upon  a 
similarity  in  their  chemical  structure. 

In  the  case  of  the  organismal  differentials  we  have  seen  that  the  reactions 
against  strange  differentials  are  not  yet  fully  formed  in  very  young  organisms. 
The  development  of  the  human  blood-group  differentials  seems  to  set  in  at 
about  six  or  seven  months  of  embryonal  life  and  to  be  completed  at  the  time  of 
birth.  But  it  has  been  maintained  that  the  full  development  of  the  A  differen- 
tial occurs  only  at  the  age  of  fifteen  to  twenty  years. 

As  to  the  agglutinins  A  and  B  which  circulate  in  the  blood  serum,  these 
originate  within  the  last  two  months  of  pregnancy;  they  develop  therefore 
later  than  the  differentials  present  in  the  cells.  In  some  cases  they  seem  to  be 
lacking  at  the  time  of  birth  and  to  be  formed  only  in  the  first  few  months  of 
extrauterine  life.  According  to  Thomsen,  they  reach  their  full  development 
only  in  children  between  five  and  ten  years  of  age,  and  a  decrease  in  the 
quantity  of  these  agglutinins  may  occur  in  old  age;  but  this  age  involution 
may  take  place  fairly  early  and  may  therefore  be  found  even  in  relatively 
young  individuals   (Schiff  and  Mendlowitsch). 

If  agglutinins  are  found  in  the  blood  of  the  newborn  child,  they  may  have 
been  derived  from  the  mother,  having  reached  the  foetus  by  way  of  the 
placenta.  But  in  case  mother  and  child  belong  to  different  blood  groups,  no 
pathological  effects  seem  to  result  from  the  combination  of  agglutinins  in  the 
blood  serum  and  the  agglutinogens  in  the  erythrocytes,  which,  theoretically, 
should  be  expected  to  act  on  each  other.  It  is  assumed  that  mechanisms  exist 
which,  as  a  rule,  prevent  the  passing  through  the  placenta  of  maternal  ag- 
glutinins capable  of  agglutinating  the  erythrocytes  of  the  child.  Von  Oettingen 
and  Witebsky  believed  that  the  occurrence  of  the  blood-group  differentials 
could  not  be  demonstrated  in  the  embryonal  part  of  the  placenta,  although 
they  are  found  in  the  maternal  decidua.  According  to  Kritschewsky,  it  is  the 
Forssman  differential  which  is  present  in  the  decidua  and  not  the  blood-group 
differential,  while  the  embryonal  placenta  is  free  of  the  latter.  However, 
Levine  has  found  that  the  Rh  antigen  may  pass  in  the  uterusr  from  the  child 
to  the  mother.  If  the  latter  does  not  possess  this  antigen,  antibodies  may  be 
produced  against  it,  which  then  pass  in  the  opposite  direction  from  the 
mother  to  the  child  and  here  may  cause  erythroblastosis  foetalis. 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  493 

In  regard  to  the  time  of  development  of  the  blood-group  differentials  and 
of  the  corresponding  agglutinins  in  the  blood  serum,  this  shows  some  paral- 
lelism to  the  time  of  origin  of  the  organismal  differentials.  The  experiments  of 
Blumenthal  have  shown  that  the  latter  are  not  yet  fully  developed  during  the 
first  stages  of  embryonal  development,  but  can  be  demonstrated  during  the 
second  half  of  the  intrauterine  life  of  the  embryo.  From  Murphy's  experiments 
on  the  transplantation  of  heterogenous  tissues  to  the  allantois,  and  from 
similar  experiments  of  various  embryologists,  we  may  conclude  that  in  early 
embryos  the  species  differentials,  or  rather  certain  mechanisms  of  reaction 
against  such  differentials,  are  not  yet  developed,  and  also  that  the  bodyfluids 
are  not  yet  injurious  to  the  strange  transplant,  but  that  not  very  much  later 
the  harmful  mechanisms  develop  in  the  embryo.  However,  as  we  have  seen, 
even  during  post-embryonal  life  the  reactions  against  strange  individuality 
differentials  are  not  as  strong  in  very*  young  animals  as  in  adults.  In  all  these 
cases  it  is  necessary  to  distinguish  between  the  presence  of  the  organismal 
differentials  and  of  the  reactions  against  the  latter  on  the  part  of  the  strange 
organism.  The  reactions  may  not  yet  be  fully  active  at  a  time  when  the  dif- 
ferentials have  already  been  completely  formed. 

One  of  the  characteristic  features  oi  individuality  differentials,  and  or- 
ganismal differentials  in  general,  is  the  lack  of  an  injurious  reaction  of  the 
bodyfluids  as  well  as  of  the  cells  of  the  host  against  cells  or  tissues  which  are 
derived  from  the  same  organism,  and  which  possess  therefore  the  same  in- 
dividuality and  the  various  other  organismal  differentials.  This  fact  is  ex- 
pressed in  our  definition  of  individuality  and  organismal  differentials.  Simi- 
larly, it  is  well  known  that,  as  a  rule,  it  is  not  possible  to  produce  antibodies 
against  autogenous  normal  cells,  or  against  substances  which  represent  a 
normal  constituent  of  the  animal  to  be  immunized,  especially  if  it  is  accessible 
to  his  bodyfluids.  This  applies  also  to  the  Forssman  differentials,  against  which 
antibodies  can  be  produced  only  in  those  species  which  do  not  possess  this 
differential ;  and  the  same  holds  good  presumably  in  the  case  of  the  blood- 
group  differentials.  It  is  a  very  interesting  fact  that  if  the  blood  cells  of  an 
individual  contain  a  certain  agglutinogen,  his  blood  serum  lacks  that  particular 
agglutinin  which  would  interact  with  its  own  blood  corpuscles  and  cause  their 
agglutination,  and  that  thus  the  formation  of  agglutination  thrombi  and 
emboli  is  avoided  (Landsteiner).  As  we  have  discussed  in  an  earlier  chapter 
Bernstein  assumes  that  in  every  individual,  to  whatever  blood  group  he  may 
belong,  all  the  agglutinins  are  produced,  including  those  which  are  able  to 
agglutinate  his  own  corpuscles;  but  the  latter  kind  of  agglutinins  are  made 
innocuous  by  union  with  the  corresponding  agglutinogens  present  in  the 
erythrocytes  of  the  same  organism,  and  only  agglutinins  which  would  act  on 
corpuscles  belonging  to  other  groups  are  left  intact.  Against  this  interpretation 
may  be  cited  the  observation  that  injection  of  rabbits  with  human  blood  cor- 
puscles of  group  A  seems  to  cause  the  formation  of  anti-A  immune  agglutinins 
only  if  the  serum  of  these  rabbits  contains  normally  some  anti-A  antibodies, 
which  implies  that  the  cells  of  this  animal  do  not  contain  A  receptors.  But 
if  actually  the  A  agglutinin  was  able  to  develop  in  a  rabbit  which  possesses  A 


494  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

agglutinogens  and  it  was  merely  hidden  by  its  union  with  these  agglutinogens, 
then  it  should  be  possible  by  means  of  an  intense  immunization  to  produce 
enough  anti-A  agglutinin  to  overbalance  the  slight  amount  of  A  receptor  pres- 
ent in  the  blood  plasma.  Or  if  it  is  assumed  that  the  red  blood  corpuscles 
themselves  can  bind  and  inactivate  this  immune  agglutinin,  then  an  ag- 
glutination of  the  erythrocytes  should  take  place  in  the  immunized  animal. 
Such  an  effect  however  seems  not  to  have  been  observed.  Similarly,  as  men- 
tioned already,  antibodies  for  the  Forssman  antigen  cannot  be  produced  in 
animals  which  belong  to  a  Forssman  positive  species,  although  in  this  case 
erythrocytes  do  not  need  to  contain  the  heterophile  differential. 

Taking  these  various  considerations  together,  we  think  it  much  more 
probable  that  in  the  case  of  the  blood  groups  we  have  to  deal  with  the  same 
phenomenon  as  in  the  case  of  the  organismal  differentials,  namely,  that  in  the 
same  organism  mutually  incompatible  constituents  do  not  develop,  and  that 
the  normal  constituents  within  the  body,  especially  if  they  are  present  also 
in  the  bodyfluids,  cannot  serve  as  antigens,  and  that  this  is  due  to  the  fact 
that  in  the  same  organism  the  analogous  proteins  and,  in  particular,  certain 
globulins  possess  some  essential  similarity  in  chemical  structure  irrespective 
of  their  situation  in  the  individual.  The  production  of  antibodies  can  take 
place,  as  a  rule,  only  when  these  differentials  show  a  definite  divergence  in 
chemical  constitution  in  host  and  donor. 

Organismal  differentials,  primary  blood-group  differentials,  the  more  re- 
cently discovered  accessory  differentials  occurring  in  human  and  also  in 
certain  animal  erythrocytes,  as  well  as  the  heterophile  Forssman  differentials, 
all  have  this  characteristic  in  common,  that  they  are  genetically  fixed  con- 
stituents of  the  various  organisms  and  do  not  owe  their  origin  to  environ- 
mental factors.  As  to  the  mode  of  inheritance,  there  are  differences  between 
the  organismal,  and  in  particular,  the  individuality  differentials  and  the  pri- 
mary as  well  as  the  accessory  blood-group  differentials.  The  individuality  dif- 
ferentials depend,  as  we  have  discussed  previously,  upon  the  presence  of 
multiple  factors,  the  number  of  which  must  be  considerable.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  inheritance  of  the  primary  blood-group  differentials  seems  to  de- 
pend upon  three  allelomorph  factors,  according  to  the  analysis  of  human 
inheritance  by  Bernstein,  whose  interpretation  has  now  been  almost  generally 
accepted.  The  inheritance  of  the  primary  blood-group  differentials  follows 
therefore  a  much  simpler  scheme  than  the  inheritance  of  the  individuality 
differentials.  Among  the  latter  many  fine  gradations  exist,  while  among  the 
former  there  is  only  a  small  number  of  variables.  According  to  Landsteiner, 
Schiff,  and  other  investigators,  the  inheritance  of  the  accessory  factors  M  and 
N  is  contingent  on  the  presence  of  an  allelomorph  pair  of  genes.  The  possible 
combinations  of  these  two  genes  are  M  M,  N  N  and  M  N.  The  factor  P  also 
seems  to  be  fixed  by  heredity.  It  has  been  observed  that  when  neither  of  the 
parents  contains  P,  none  of  the  children  contain  it.  The  factor  H  is  believed 
to  be  represented  by  a  single  dominant  gene.  We  may  then  conclude  that 
the  mode  of  inheritance  of  the  primary  blood-group  differentials  differs  not 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  495 

only  from  that  of  the  individuality  differentials,  but  also  from  that  of  the 
accessory  blood-group  differentials. 

There  are  found,  thus,  in  human  erythrocytes,  a  number  of  different  differ- 
entials. We  have  mentioned  the  occurrence  of  species  differentials,  of  the 
typical  blood-group  differentials,  of  the  accessory  blood-group  differentials, 
of  the  Forssman  differentials,  and  of  certain  special  differentials  which  human 
erythrocytes  and  erythrocytes  of  some  distant  animal  species  have  in  com- 
mon. In  addition,  we  must  consider  the  possibility  of  the  occurrence  of  organ 
differentials  in  various  types  of  human  cells.  In  this  connection  the  observa- 
tions of  Jacobs  are  of  interest.  He  compared  the  ability  of  the  erythrocytes 
of  many  different  species  to  absorb  various  kinds  of  chemicals  and  he  found, 
on  the  whole,  that  the  corpuscles  of  related  species  resemble  each  other  more 
in  their  permeability  to  and  absorbing  powers  of  certain  substances  than  do 
the  erythrocytes  from  animals  more  distant  phylogenetically,  although  a 
strict  grading  according  to  phylogenetic  relationship  is  not  possible.  The  red 
blood  corpuscles  behave  in  this  respect  like  some  blood-group  differentials 
and  characteristics  of  organs  which  may  show  a  certain  correspondence  to  the 
phylogenetic  development  of  these  cells  and  organs.  But  a  gradation  in  the 
organismal  differentials  present  in  the  erythrocytes  according  to  the  relation- 
ship of  the  various  species  would  also  explain  this  phenomenon. 

This  is  in  all  probability  a  very  incomplete  list  of  the  differentials  oc- 
curring in  erythrocytes  and  we  may  assume  that  besides  those  named,  there 
occur  other  differentials.  Of  special  interest  for  us  is  the  question  whether 
also  individuality  differentials  are  present  in  human  erythrocytes.  Experiments 
which  we  have  discussed  in  an  earlier  chapter  make  this  very  probable.  Do 
transfusion  experiments  give  any  indication  of  their  presence?  There  are  some 
observations  concerning  injurious  results  following  transfusions  of  apparently 
compatible  blood  which  suggest  such  a  possibility ;  but  other  interpretations 
of  these  occurrences,  such  as  the  presence  of  an  agglutinogen  common  to 
man  and  Rhesus  monkey  in  the  blood  of  the  donor,  or  of  an  immune  ag- 
glutinin in  the  blood  of  the  person  which  received  the  transfusion,  or  the 
presence  of  agglutinogens  A  and  B  in  human  blood  plasma  used  for  intra- 
venous injection  (M.  Levine  and  D.  State),  cannot  be  excluded. 

We  shall  now  briefly  summarize  our  conclusions  concerning  (1)  the  rela- 
tions between  blood  groups  and  organismal  and,  in  particular,  individuality 
differentials;  (2)  the  relations  between  blood  groups  and  what  is  designated 
as  "constitution,"  and  (3)  the  general  significance  of  the  antigens  discussed  in 
this  chapter. 

(1)  The  primary  blood-group  differentials  do  not  make  possible  a  dis- 
tinction between  different  individuals  in  general,  but  only  between  some 
individuals  ;  they  do  not  indicate  the  degree  of  relationship  between  individuals  ; 
they  differ  in  these  and  in  other  respects  from  the  individuality  differentials. 

However,  if  in  addition  to  the  primary  blood-group  differentials,  we  con- 
sider other  types  of  differentials  which  may  be  found  in  erythrocytes,  such  as 
the  accessory  blood-group  differentials,  the  Forssman  and  accessory  hetero- 


496  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

genetic  antigens,  it  is  possible  that  all  of  them  combined,  or  even  a  certain 
number  of  them,  might  suffice  to  distinguish  individuals,  but  they  would 
not  in  all  probability  indicate  the  relationship  of  these  individuals.  But  there 
is  reason  for  assuming  that  also  a  combination  of  various  organ  differentials 
might  differentiate  between  different  individuals,  although  they  would  not 
be  identical  with  the  individuality  differentials.  To  demonstrate  the  identity 
of  the  former  with  the  individuality  differentials,  the  proof  would  first  have 
to  be  given  that  they  are  qualitatively  the  same  in  all  the  essential  tissues  of 
the  same  individual,  and  different  in  all  other  individuals ;  furthermore,  that 
these  sets  of  blood-group  differentials  are  actually  the  ones  which  function 
in  the  various  individuals  as  individuality  differentials,  or  that  they  are  an 
important  constituent  of  the  individuality  and  species  differentials.  This  is  very 
improbable  as  far  as  the  primary  blood  groups  are  concerned,  because,  as 
we  have  seen,  the  results  of  homoiotransplantations  are  independent  of  the 
distribution  of  these  differentials;  besides,  the  presence  of  similar  blood- 
group  differentials  in  different  species  of  animals  does  not  affect  noticeably 
the  severity  of  the  reaction  following  heterotransplantation  in  such  species. 
The  Forssman  antigens,  which  are  characteristic  of  very  diverse  species,  can 
be  removed  or  neutralized  by  means  of  specific  absorption  without  the  species 
differentials  being  affected  by  this  procedure.  However,  as  already  stated,  if 
the  number  of  blood-group  differentials  serving  as  agglutinogens  or  able  to 
give  rise  to  the  production  of  hemolysins  is  greatly  increased  in  the  individ- 
uals belonging  to  a  certain  species,  then  it  is  possible  that  such  sets  of  poten- 
tial antigens  may  more  and  more  coincide  with  the  factors  composing  the  in- 
dividuality differentials. 

To  recapitulate :  There  are  at  least  four  requirements  which  have  to  be 
satisfied  before  a  set  of  differentials  can  be  accepted  as  representing  the 
individuality  differentials :  (a)  they  must  make  possible  the  distinction  be- 
tween individuals;  (b)  they  must  occur  in  all  or  almost  all  the  tissues  of  an 
individual  and  thus  allow  the  distinction  of  the  tissues  of  one  individual  from 
the  different  tissues  of  another  individual ;  (c)  they  must  indicate  the  relation- 
ship of  a  particular  individual  to  another  individual,  and  (d)  their  inheritance 
must  not  depend  upon  a  very  small  number  of  factors  which  are  transmitted 
in  accordance  with  simple  Mendelian  rules  of  alternate  inheritance.  The  pri- 
mary blood  groups,  and  even  the  accessory  blood-group  differentials,  as  well 
as  the  various  heterogenetic  antigens  have  not,  so  far,  been  shown  fully  to 
satisfy  these  requirements.  However,  the  possibility  cannot  be  excluded  that 
blood-group  differentials  may  be  a  constituent  part  of  the  individuality  dif- 
ferentials. It  seems  that  a  comparison  of  the  ability  of  the  erythrocytes  to 
absorb  various  chemicals,  and  presumably  also  other  physiological  or  phar- 
macological tests,  indicate  better  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  species 
from  which  the  red  cells  to  be  tested  are  derived,  than  the  study  of  the  relations 
between  blood-group  differentials  and  blood  sera  of  various  species  of  animals. 
As  we  have  stated  in  a  preceding  chapter,  various  tissue  and  organ  differentials, 
whether  their  significance  is  due  to  structural,  biochemical  or  functional  con- 


BLOOD  GROUPS,  HETEROGENETIC  ANTIGENS  497 

ditions,  may  serve  to  distinguish  between  individuals,  and  inasmuch  as  these 
characteristics  have  a  genetic  basis,  they  might  in  a  limited  way  even  indicate 
certain  relationships  between  individuals.  But  they  would  not,  therefore, 
become  identical  with  individuality  differentials.  The  four  primary  blood- 
group  differentials  are  essentially  tissue  differentials,  which  have  however 
certain  characteristics  in  common  with  the  individuality  differentials  while 
they  differ  from  the  latter  in  other  respects;  but  the  larger  the  number  of 
accessory  blood-group  differentials  which  are  added  to  the  primary  group,  the 
greater  will,  in  all  probability,  become  the  similarity  between  blood-group 
and  individuality  differentials. 

(2)  Some  authors  have  identified  the  blood-group  differentials  with  the 
constitutional  characteristics  of  a  certain  individual.  The  constitution  of  an 
individual  means  an  inherited  or  acquired  constellation  of  structures  which  de- 
termine his  characteristic  modes  of  reaction  or  tendencies,  including  those  of 
an  abnormal  kind.  These  inherited  or  acquired  modes  of  reaction  or  tendencies, 
as  a  rule,  become  manifest  only  in  their  interaction  with  variable  factors  of  the 
inner  and  outer  environment.  The  emphasis  is  laid  in  this  definition  of  con- 
stitution on  the  reaction-modes ;  but  constitution  may  also  mean  that  a  certain 
reaction-mode  of  an  organism  is  associated  with  a  specific  inherited  habitus  or 
structural  feature,  and  in  this  case  tne  emphasis  is  laid  on  the  structural 
aspect.  Only  in  the  sense  that  the  blood-group  differentials  are  an  inherited 
characteristic  may  they  be  considered  as  part  of  the  constitution,  without, 
however,  representing  the  whole  or  even  the  essential  features  of  the  con- 
stitution. Probably  because  of  the  readiness  and  sharpness  with  which  the 
blood-group  differentials  .can  usually  be  determined  in  human  beings,  and 
because  of  the  role  they  play  in  blood  transfusion  and  because  of  the  in- 
herited differences  in  their  distribution  among  different  individuals  were  they 
considered  as  specially  representative  of  the  constitution  of  individuals  or 
races.  However,  there  is  more  justification  for  the  belief  that  the  various 
kinds  of  organismal  differentials  represent  to  a  much  higher  degree  the  con- 
stitution of  an  individual,  or  a  race,  or  of  a  species,  than  do  the  blood-group 
differentials. 

(3)  Individuals  and  species  may  have  special  genes  or  gene  combinations  in 
common  which  determine  the  formation  of  special  differentials  and  antigens 
as  revealed  by  serological  methods.  The  latter  indicate  particular  relation- 
ships between  these  individuals  and  species  or  they  can  be  used  as  a  means 
of  distinguishing  between  these  individuals  and  species.  The  main  problem 
which  we  have  discussed  in  this  chapter  concerns  the  connection  between 
such  special  differentials  and  the  organismal  and  in  particular  the  individual- 
ity differentials  and  the  relationships  which  the  various  differentials  have  to 
one  another  which  may  render  them  significant  in  the  analysis  of  individuality. 


Chapter  2 

The  Demonstration  of  Species  Differentials  by 

Serological  Methods 

At  the  end  of  the  last  and  in  the  beginning  of  this  century,  when  our 
knowledge  of  experimental  immunity  began  to  develop  and  it  was 
^  found  that  immune  bodies  could  be  produced  not  only  against  bac- 
teria but  also  against  cells,  which  are  normal  constituents  of  the  body  of 
higher  animals,  and  against  proteins,  such  as  those  of  the  blood,  the  problem 
arose  more  definitely  as  to  the  chemical  basis  for  the  differences  and  the  rela- 
tionships between  various  animal  species  and  as  to  the  possibility  of  ap- 
proaching this  problem  by  the  methods  of  immunology.  It  was  important  to 
know  whether  the  relationship  between  different  species  and  classes  of  ani- 
mals, which  so  far  had  been  studied  mainly  by  the  morphological  methods 
of  comparative  anatomy  and  embryology,  could  be  measured  also  by  sero- 
logical methods  and  whether  the  results  obtained  by  these  two  methods 
agreed  with  each  other.  The  chemical  constitution  of  the  cells  and  proteins 
serving  as  antigens,  and  the  antibodies  produced  by  the  injection  of  these 
antigens  into  other  animals  should  then  correspond  to  the  systematic  relation- 
ship of  the  various  species  and  they  should  show  similar  gradations. 

Friedenthal  in  1900  first  studied  the  relationship  of  animal  species  by  testing 
the  compatibility  between  the  transfused  blood  of  a  foreign  species  and  the 
blood  of  the  host  species.  Hemoglobinuria  resulting  from  hemolysis  of  the 
strange  blood  corpuscles  would  signify  incompatibility  between  the  blood 
sera  and  the  red  blood  cells  of  the  two  species.  He  also  found  in  in  vitro  tests 
that  only  the  erythrocytes  of  anthropoid  apes  resist  solution  by  human  sera, 
while  the  blood  corpuscles  of  lower  monkeys  are  dissolved.  In  these  investiga- 
tions the  relation  between  preformed  constituents  of  sera  and  erythrocytes  was 
used  as  a  test,  rather  than  the  reactions  between  an  antigen  and  the  immune 
substances  resulting  from  injection  of  the  antigens  into  a  foreign  species. 
Gruenbaum,  in  1902,  first  used  the  precipitin  test  in  analyzing  relationships 
between  species.  This  method  depends  upon  the  production,  in  an  animal 
injected  with  blood  serum  from  another  species,  of  substances  (precipitins) 
which  have  the  power  to  precipitate  specifically  certain  constituents  of  the 
serum  used  for  injection.  Neither  Gruenbaum  nor  subsequent  investigators 
were  able  to  differentiate  between  man  and  anthropoid  apes  in  this  way.  Two 
years  later,  Nuttall  published  the  results  of  very  extensive  systematic  studies, 
in  which  by  means  of  precipitins  he  tested  the  relationship  of  many  species, 
not  only  of  vertebrates  but  also  of  invertebrates.  In  general,  his  findings  con- 
firmed the  conclusions  of  zoologists  as  to  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  ani- 
mals,   which    were    based    on    morphological    criteria.    This    method    was 

498 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        499 

subsequently  employed  for  similar  experiments  by  Uhlenhuth  and  his  col- 
laborators. They  introduced  a  refinement  in  the  precipitin  test  by  obtaining 
the  precipitins  from  animals  belonging  to  one  of  the  species  whose  blood  was 
to  be  tested  or  from  a  related  species.  For  this  purpose,  cross-immunization 
was  used  between  two  species,  the  relationship  of  which  was  to  be  studied 
by  the  precipitin  test,  each  of  the  two  species  being  injected  with  the  blood 
serum  of  the  other  species.  This  method  eliminated  the  coarser  reactions 
which  led  to  the  production  of  less  specific  precipitins  in  farther  distantly 
related  animals  which  had  been  immunized  against  blood  serum.  Thus,  by 
immunizing  rabbits  with  hare  serum  Uhlenhuth  could  obtain  specific  precipi- 
tins for  hare  blood,  although  it  was  not  possible  to  distinguish  between  in- 
dividual rabbits.  Similarly,  through  a  slight  modification  of  the  same  method, 
Black  succeeded  in  differentiating  Negro  chickens  from  Italian  chickens, 
individuals  belonging  to  a  third  chicken  species  being  immunized  against 
Negro  and  Italian  chickens.  Subsequently,  further  refinements  were  intro- 
duced by  Boyden,  Hektoen,  Wolfe,  and  Wilhelmi.  The  specificity  of  the 
precipitin  test  was  enhanced  by  limiting  the  amount  of  protein  injected  into 
animals  to  be  immunized,  by  dilution  of  the  anti-sera,  by  using  reciprocal  tests 
and  quantitative  methods  of  determination,  by  removing  the  lipids  from  the 
antigens  and  in  addition  also  by  employing  a  nephelometric  method  of  meas- 
urement. In  some  instances  it  was  possible  to  distinguish  between  the  serum 
proteins  of  such  closely  related  animal  species  as  ox,  sheep  and  goat,  and  in 
some  cases  even  between  the  proteins  of  buffalo  and  ox  serum.  With  these 
improved  methods  it  was  also  possible  to  differentiate  between  nearly  related 
species  of  birds  and  of  reptiles,  classes  of  animals  which  had  not  been  found 
very  suitable  in  the  experiments  of  Nuttall.  By  considering  also  the  results  of 
cross-reactions  and  of  absorption  or  exhaustion  tests  of  immune  sera  against 
egg  albumins  of  various  species  of  birds,  differentiation  between  these  species 
was  possible  (Hooker  and  Boyd,  Landsteiner  and  van  der  Scheer).  In  using 
these  precautions,  the  ring-test  for  the  detection  of  precipitates  permits  not 
only  the  determination  of  relationships,  but  also  the  degrees  of  relationship 
between  various  species. 

Still,  it  was  found  impossible  to  distinguish  in  every  case  by  the  ordinary 
precipitin  method  between  man  and  anthropoid  apes,  and  between  horse  and 
donkey.  On  the  other  hand,  certain  differences  were  more  readily  found 
between  man  and  lower  monkeys,  and  the  Old  World  monkeys  were  shown 
to  be  more  nearly  related  to  man  than  the  New  World  monkeys.  It  was  also 
possible  to  distinguish  between  rat  and  mouse,  and  in  recent  experiments 
Landsteiner  and  Levine  observed,  in  one  case,  that  by  the  use  of  Uhlenhuth's 
method  precipitins  could  be  produced  which  differentiate  the  blood  sera  of 
man  and  chimpanzee.  These  investigators  immunized  a  chimpanzee  with 
human  serum  proteins  and  thus  obtained  an  immune  serum  which  precipitated 
only  human  serum  but  not  chimpanzee  serum.  However,  this  differentiation 
could  be  much  better  accomplished  by  applying  the  Uhlenhuth  method  to  the 
production  of  hemagglutinins.  Furthermore,  Hicks  and  Little  traced,  by 
means  of  the  precipitin  test,  the  relationship  and  origin  of  different  species 


500  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  mice.  By  immunizing  rabbits,  they  believe  that  they  succeeded  in  differen- 
tiating between  Mus  musculus  and  Mus  bactrianus ;  however,  Mus  musculus 
could  not  be  differentiated  from  Mus  farvensis  and  Mus  bactrianus  behaved 
like  the  Japanese  waltzing  mouse.  These  investigators  concluded,  therefore, 
that  Mus  musculus  is  closely  related  to  Mus  farvensis,  and  Mus  bactrianus  to 
the  Japanese  waltzing  mouse.  But,  as  Boyden  remarks,  this  serological  differ- 
entiation of  two  so  nearly  related  species  is  unusual  and  needs  confirmation. 
By  reducing  very  much  the  quantities  of  antigen  used  for  immunization  Wolfe 
was  able  to  distinguish,  by  means  of  the  precipitin  reaction,  between  gray 
squirrel  and  red  squirrel,  and  also  between  ox  and  sheep,  but  not  between 
goat  and  sheep. 

By  means  of  reciprocal  immunization  Boyden  found  the  dog  to  be  more 
closely  related  to  the  pig  than  to  the  horse;  still  further  distant  from  dog 
were  beef  and  sheep ;  beef  was  nearest  related  to  sheep,  then  followed  horse 
and  pig  and  dog.  However,  Boyden  is  careful  to  state  that  these  tests  merely 
indicate  the  relationship  of  these  animals  as  they  are  constituted  at  present,  and 
that  they  do  not  necessarily  correspond  exactly  to  the  phylogenetic  evolution 
of  these  species.  Greater  are  the  difficulties  of  distinguishing,  by  means  of 
the  precipitin  reactions,  species  among  reptiles  and  amphibia,  if  rabbits  are 
used  for  immunization,  although  to  some  extent  this,  too,  can  be  accomplished. 
This  method,  supplemented  by  absorption  tests,  made  it  also  possible  to  dif- 
ferentiate between  the  hemocyanins  present  in  the  blood  of  various  arthropods. 
Within  a  certain  range  there  existed  a  relation  between  the  strength  of 
the  precipitin  reaction  and  the  phylogenetic  nearness  or  distance  of  the  species 
used. 

Different  species  of  birds  could  be  especially  well  differentiated  serologically 
(Defalco),  more  readily  than  mammals,  amphibians  or  fishes;  it  is  therefore 
believed  that  birds  represent  a  very  homogeneous  group.  Blood  serum,  crystal- 
lized egg  albumin  and  lens  of  the  eye,  or  hemoglobin,  when  used  as  antigens, 
gave  essentially  similar  results,  except  that  in  serum  several  proteins  were 
present,  which  introduced  certain  complications,  while  egg  albumin  and 
hemoglobin  represented  essentially  single  proteins.  Among  invertebrates  sharp 
differentiations  could  be  made  between  species  belonging  to  different  genera 
as  well  as  between  others  which  belonged  to  the  same  genus.  On  the  strength 
of  his  tests  of  helminth  species,  Wilhelmi  believed  that  it  was  possible  to 
define  quantitatively  the  dilution  of  the  antigen  in  the  precipitin  reaction 
which  was  characteristic  of  species  differences.  The  results  obtained  with  the 
precipitin  reaction  were  also  in  conformity  with  the  conclusion  that  echino- 
derms,  and  especially  holothurians,  were  more  closely  related  to  prochordates 
than  were  annelids.  In  general,  then,  serological  tests  confirmed  and  made 
more  secure  earlier  conclusions  based  mainly  on  structural  studies. 

The  relationships  of  plants  have  been  studied  very  extensively,  by  Mez 
and  others,  by  means  of  precipitin  tests,  and  they  have  thus  traced  the 
phylogenetic  evolution  of  the  vegetable  kingdom.  In  contrast  to  the  experi- 
ments in  animals,  where  usually  body  fluids  or  some  of  their  constituents  were 
used  as  antigens,  Mez  employed  for  his  determination,  extracts  of  young, 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        501 

growing  parts  of  plants,  in  which  storage  of  proteins,  and  possibly  also  of 
other  substances,  is  as  yet  less  prominent  than  in  fully  developed  parts,  and 
especially  less  prominent  than  in  seeds.  Before  using  material  from  growing 
parts  as  antigen  he  freed  it  from  its  fatty  constituents  through  extraction 
with  alcohol  and  ether,  and  this  procedure  greatly  increased  the  specificity  of 
the  reaction,  which,  as  in  the  case  of  animal  serum  reactions,  depends  pri- 
marily upon  the  proteins  contained  in  the  antigen  solutions.  Mez  assumed 
that  the  increase  in  specificity  of  the  reaction,  caused  by  previous  absorption  of 
the  lipids  from  the  tissue  furnishing  the  antigen,  is  due  to  the  lack  of  species- 
specificity  of  these  lipid  substances.  By  means  of  this  method,  Mez  attempted 
to  trace  the  development  of  plants  from  bacteria  to  algae  and  mosses,  and 
from  these  to  the  higher  organisms.  More  recently,  Steinecke  has  extended 
these  investigations.  According  to  Boyden,  these  phytoserological  studies  have 
yielded  data  of  crudely  quantitative  nature  which  support  the  concepts  of 
plant  phylogeny  advanced  already  on  the  basis  of  morphological  studies.  In 
a  similar  way  Wilhelmi  found  that  the  previous  extraction  of  lipids  from  the 
antigens  increased  the  value  of  the  precipitin  reaction  as  a  method  for  deter- 
mining phylogenetic  relationships  of  helminths.  After  the  lipids  had  been 
removed,  the  proteins  acted  as  potent  species-specific  antigens,  whereas  the 
presence  of  lipids  interfered  with  this  reaction,  because  these  substances  by 
combining  with  a  protein  could  function  as  haptens,  which  are  less  effectively 
species-specific  and  may  be  organ-specific. 

In  general,  we  may  then  conclude  that  substances  of  protein  character, 
which  differ  in  their  constitution  in  different,  not  too  nearly  related  species, 
may  serve  as  antigens  and  lead  to  the  production  of  precipitins  which  react 
specifically  with  the  antigen  by  the  formation  of  precipitates.  If  we  compare 
the  interactions  of  different  antigens  with  the  same  immune  serum,  we  notice 
that  the  strength  of  these  reactions  indicates  the  graded  relationship  of  these 
antigens  and  of  the  animals  from  which  they  were  obtained.  By  the  introduc- 
tion of  certain  refinements  in  the  methods  used,  distinction  may  be  made  in 
this  way  also  between  more  nearly  related  species,  although  as  a  general 
rule  it  is  possible  by  the  ordinary  precipitin  methods  to  distinguish  only  be- 
tween species  belonging  to  different  orders,  and  it  may  be  difficult  to  estab- 
lish fine  gradations  even  between  different  orders.  In  principle,  then,  these 
antigens  behave  like  the  coarser  types  of  organismal  differentials. 

Soon  after  the  precipitin  test  had  been  introduced  as  a  serological  test  for 
phylogenetic  relationship,  Marshall,  in  the  laboratory  of  Ehrlich,  used  for  the 
same  purpose,  hemolysis,  the  solution  of  red  corpuscles  by  means  of  pre- 
formed or  of  immune  sera.  Thus  he  found  a  close  relationship  between  the 
antigens  present  in  the  erythrocytes  of  man  and  of  Macacus  monkeys.  How- 
ever, certain  differences  were  observed  in  the  hemolyzing  power  of  active 
monkey  serum  for  human  and  monkey  erythrocytes,  respectively,  and  differ- 
ences between  these  two  kinds  of  blood  were  established  also  by  absorption 
tests,  in  which  different  antibodies  present  in  the  same  immune  serum  could  be 
separated  from  each  other  by  specific  absorption  with  erythrocytes  from 
different  species,  to  which  these  antibody  fractions  had  specific  affinities. 


502  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

More  recently,  Landsteiner  and  Miller  were  able  to  differentiate  between 
the  blood  of  man,  of  chimpanzee  and  orang-utan  by  means  of  immune  hemag- 
glutinins, which  they  produced  in  rabbits,  against  these  various  types  of 
erythrocytes,  but  it  was  necessary  first  to  remove,  by  specific  absorption,  the 
non-specific  agglutinins  which  these  species  had  in  common.  These  investi- 
gators found  that  the  differences  between  the  blood  of  man  and  chimpanzee 
or  orang-utan  are  less  marked  than  those  between  these  species  and  the 
lower  monkeys.  As  mentioned  above,  Landsteiner  and  Levine  furthermore 
succeeded  in  obtaining  hemagglutinins  which  agglutinated  only  human  but 
not  chimpanzee  erythrocytes,  by  injecting  a  chimpanzee  with  human  erythro- 
cytes, in  this  manner  applying  Uhlenhuth's  method  to  the  hemagglutinin  test. 
In  still  another  and  more  simple  way  they  were  able  to  differentiate  between 
human  and  chimpanzee  blood  by  the  use  of  the  preformed  heteroagglutinins 
which  occur  in  ox  serum.  After  absorption  with  chimpanzee  erythrocytes,  ox 
serum  still  agglutinated  human  corpuscles  very  strongly  and,  conversely,  after 
absorption  with  human  corpuscles  it  was  still  active  towards  chimpanzee 
blood. 

Certain  additional  methods  were  employed  for  the  purpose  of  grading  the 
relationship  of  antigens  derived  from  different  species.  Thus  alcohol  extracts 
of  various  types  of  blood  corpuscles  in  combination  with  a  foreign  serum, 
the  protein  of  which  served  as  carrier,  could  be  used  as  antigens  for  the 
production  of  hemolysins.  When  these  alcohol  soluble,  partial  antigens  were 
acted  upon  by  the  specific,  heat-inactivated  hemolytic  immune  sera,  a  floccula- 
tion  and  also  a  fixation  of  complement  occurred,  which  were  specific.  Specific 
complement  fixation  has  been  employed  for  the  testing  of  graded  relationships 
of  antigens  by  various  investigators.  Many  years  ago,  Bruck  believed  that  it 
was  possible  to  demonstrate,  through  complement  fixation,  differences  even 
between  the  blood  of  different  human  races,  such  as  European,  Malay,  Arab 
and  Chinese.  However,  this  observation  could  not  be  confirmed  by  Marshall 
and  Teague,  nor  by  Fitzgerald ;  nor  were  Landsteiner  and  Miller  able  by 
serological  methods  to  demonstrate  differences  between  the  blood  cells  of  the 
white  race  and  the  Negro. 

A  further  test  for  the  specificity  of  antigens,  especially  of  haptens  which 
are  non-protein  components  of  antigens,  was  introduced  by  Landsteiner.  Such 
haptens,  which  when  injected  alone  into  an  animal  belonging  to  a  foreign 
species  do  not  call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies,  do  so  if  they  are 
combined  with  a  foreign  protein  acting  as  the  carrier  of  the  specific  substance. 
But  even  without  the  aid  of  a  carrier  they  may  be  able  to  inhibit  in  a  specific 
manner  the  reaction  between  the  antigen  and  the  specific  immune  serum, 
irrespective  of  whether  this  reaction  consists  in  precipitation,  hemolysis,  or 
hemagglutination. 

Also,  anaphylactic  reactions  have  been  used,  especially  by  Wells  and  Os- 
borne, for  the  testing  of  the  organismal  specificity  of  certain  substances.  These 
investigators  worked  with  alcohol  soluble  proteins  from  various  seeds,  such 
as  gliadin  from  wheat  and  rye,  hordein  from  barley,  zein  from  maize.  First 
they  showed  that  the  occurrence  of  anaphylactic  shock  in  sensitized  guinea 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        503 

pigs  depended  upon  the  chemical  relationship  between  the  substances  used 
for  sensitization  and  for  reinjection,  irrespective  of  the  species  of  the  plant 
from  which  the  substances  had  been  obtained.  Thus,  for  instance,  gliadin 
and  hordein,  although  they  occur  in  seeds  of  different  species,  could  not  be 
differentiated  by  means  of  anaphylaxis,  because  their  chemical  structure  was 
similar.  Corresponding  results  were  obtained  with  other  substances  resem- 
bling albumoses  in  their  reactions,  which  likewise  were  isolated  from  seeds ; 
however,  these  substances  were  not,  in  all  probability,  split  products  of  pro- 
teins, because  real  albumoses  or  peptones  seem  to  lose  their  power  to  sensitize 
the  guinea  pig.  With  these  materials  from  seeds,  bcause  of  their  solubility 
in  water,  anaphylactic  reactions  could  be  obtained  much  more  readily  than 
with  the  above  mentioned  alcohol  soluble  substances.  The  tests  indicated  that 
these  albumose-like  substances  are  quite  distinct  immunologically  from  the 
alcohol  soluble  substances,  although  both  occur  in  the  same  kinds  of  seeds. 
A  relative  overlapping  of  reactions  in  experiments  was  apparently  due  to 
impurities,  it  being  impossible  to  separate  completely  the  first  and  the  second 
type  of  substances. 

Wells  and  Osborne  concluded,  then,  that  the  specificity  in  the  anaphylactic 
reaction  depends  primarily  not  on  the  biologic  origin,  but  on  the  chemical  con- 
stitution of  the  substances  used  for  sensitization  and  the  production  of  shock. 
But,  the  chemical  constitution  furnishes  the  basis  for  the  biological  specificity, 
and  biological  specificity  depends  upon  the  constitution  of  tissue  constituents, 
and  there  should  therefore  be  expected  a  correlation  between  the  chemical 
constitution  of  plant  proteins  and  the  systematic  position  of  the  plants  in 
which  these  substances  originated.  When,  in  the  case  of  these  plants  substance- 
specificity  was  prominent,  whereas  species-specificity  was  not  manifest,  it 
may  be  assumed  that  besides  the  biologically  important  seed  proteins,  which 
could  not  be  differentiated,  there  were  other  chemically  distinct  substances 
present  in  the  embryo  proper,  which  were  not  indicative  of  organismal  dif- 
ferentials. In  experiments  with  proteoses  there  was  a  slight  interaction  be- 
tween those  of  pea  and  soy  bean,  two  nearly  related  substances,  and  in  more 
recent  investigations  Lewis  and  Wells  found  more  definite  evidence  of  a 
correlation  between  chemical  constitution  and  systematic  relationship. 

By  means  of  various  anaphylactic  methods,  such  as  the  uterus  strip  method 
of  Dale,  the  bronchospasm  method  and  the  production  of  shock,  as  well  as  by 
the  use  of  the  complement  fixation  tests,  these  investigators  observed  that 
the  alcohol  soluble  proteins  from  certain  cereal  grains  can  be  separated  into  a 
wheat  group  and  a  corn  group.  The  various  proteins  of  the  wheat  group  could 
not  be  differentiated  from  one  another  by  immunological  methods,  nor  could 
the  members  of  the  corn  group  be  thus  distinguished.  On  the  other  hand, 
there  were  sharp  distinctions  and  a  lack  of  cross  reactions  between  two 
proteins  which  belonged  to  different  groups ;  analogous  proteins  in  related 
species  behaved  immunologically  in  the  same  way,  but  they  were  distinct 
from  the  proteins  of  further  removed  species.  These  results  agree  with  the 
chemical  analysis  of  these  substances  by  Gortner  and  Hoffman,  which  showed 
the  great  chemical  resemblance  of  the  analogous  alcohol  soluble  substances 


504  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

in  the  various  species  of  the  wheat  group  and  their  differences  from  those 
belonging  to  the  corn  group.  However,  Gortner  also  refers  to  differences  in 
the  number  of  chromosome  sets  which  exist  between  different  members  of  the 
wheat  group  and  to  corresponding  differences  in  hybridizability  between  these 
species.  It  seems,  then,  that  here  cytological  differentiations  and  the  mode  of 
interaction  of  spermatozoa  and  ova  of  various  species  during  fertilization  are 
much  finer  tests  for  the  constitution  of  organismal  differentials  than  the 
chemical  analysis  of  the  alcohol  soluble  proteins,  or  the  serological  methods, 
such  as  anaphylaxis  or  complement  fixation. 

In  the  case  of  some  animal  substances,  Dakin  and  Dale,  using  the  uterus 
strip  method  for  the  diagnosis  of  an  anaphylactic  state,  were  able  to  differen- 
tiate between  the  crystalline  egg  albumens  of  hen  and  duck.  The  specificity  of 
this  reaction  could  also  be  shown  by  means  of  specific  desensitization.  In  more 
recent  years,  Landsteiner's  demonstration  that  certain  antigens  are  complex 
and  consist  of  a  combination  of  non-protein  hapten  and  a  foreign  protein 
which  acts  as  a  carrier,  was  followed  by  attempted  immunization  against  these 
complex  antigens,  and  in  this  connection  use  was  made  also  of  anaphylaxis 
as  a  test  for  the  specificity  of  various  antigens  and  of  the  relative  significance 
of  these  two  component  parts  of  the  antigen. 

In  such  experiments,  in  order  to  sensitize  a  guinea  pig  against  a  hapten,  it 
was  necessary  to  inject  the  latter  in  association  with  a  foreign  protein,  the 
hapten  alone  not  being  able  to  cause  sensitization.  As  to  the  means  of  produc- 
ing shock  in  actively  or  passively  sensitized  guinea  pigs  through  a  second 
injection  of  the  antigen,  somewhat  divergent  results  were  obtained.  Land- 
steiner  could,  in  some  cases,  but  not  in  all,  produce  anaphylactic  shock  in 
guinea  pigs  sensitized  with  an  azodye-protein  combination  by  injecting  the 
azodye  alone.  It  has  even  been  maintained  that  it  is  possible  to  sensitize 
guinea  pigs  by  injection  of  diazotized  atoxyl  alone  and,  moreover,  to  cause 
shock  in  animals  thus  sensitized  by  injection  of  the  same  substance;  it  was 
further  assumed  that  under  these  conditions  the  injected  animal's  own  serum 
may  act  as  carrier.  In  guinea  pigs  sensitized  against  the  polysaccharides, 
which  are  responsible  for  the  type-specificity  of  pneumococci,  it  was  necessary 
to  inject  the  animal  with  the  same  kind  of  polysaccharide,  in  combination  with 
a  protein,  for  the  production  of  shock.  On  the  other  hand,  intradermal  injec- 
tion of  the  type-specific  pneumococcus  polysaccharide  alone  could  bring  about 
a  specific  inflammatory  skin  reaction. 

However,  a  specific  glucoside,  which  itself  was  not  able  to  produce  shock 
nor,  correspondingly,  to  cause  precipitation  with  antisera,  inhibited  in  a  specific 
manner  the  condition  of  shock,  which  otherwise  would  have  resulted  in 
sensitized  guinea  pigs,  by  the  injection  of  the  glucoside  in  association  with  a 
protein  (Tillet,  Avery  and  Goebel).  Similarly,  the  hapten  inhibited  precipita- 
tion, which  would  ordinarily  have  resulted  from  the  precipitin-antigen  com- 
bination. 

In  the  case  of  streptococci  the  specific  carbohydrate,  without  the  addition  of 
foreign  protein,  could  induce  shock  in  passively  sensitized  guinea  pigs,  pro- 
vided the  immune  serum  used  for  passive  immunization  had  been  very  effec- 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        505 

tive  (Lance field).  Also,  specific  nucleo-proteins  isolated  from  streptococci 
could  readily  serve  as  sensitizers  and  likewise  induce  shock. 

In  general,  it  seems  then  that  the  specificity  of  the  anaphylactic  reactions 
is  of  about  the  same  order  as  that  of  the  ordinary  precipitin  and  complement 
fixation  tests.  There  is  no  indication  that  by  means  of  the  anaphylactic 
reaction  it  may  be  possible  to  differentiate  between  individuality  differentials, 
although  this  reaction  may  very  well  serve  for  the  demonstration  of  species 
differentials  and  of  chemical  substance-specificity. 

Wells  and  Osborne  were  able  to  find  in  every  case  in  which  two  sub- 
stances were  specific,  as  far  as  the  anaphylactic  test  indicated  such  specificity, 
a  definite  chemical,  in  contrast  to  a  mere  stereoisomeric  constitutional  differ- 
ence between  these  two  substances ;  and  this  was  true  not  only  of  the  alcohol 
soluble  plant  proteins,  but  also  of  five  substances  derived  from  ovomucoid. 
From  former  data  it  might  have  been  expected  that  also  stereoisomeric  dif- 
ferences between  substances  might  give  rise  to  specific  serological  reactions, 
and,  as  we  shall  see  later,  Landsteiner  subsequently  succeeded  in  demonstrat- 
ing effective  stereoisomeric  differences  in  haptens  by  means  of  the  precipitin 
reaction. 

There  still  remains  one  point  to  be  discussed.  We  have  noticed  that  in  the 
experiments  of  Wells  and  Osborne,  and  in  those  of  Lewis  and  Wells,  the 
specificity  of  the  reactions  was  either  absolute,  one  substance  sensitizing 
exclusively  against  the  substance  used  for  the  production  of  anaphylactic 
shock,  or  the  reaction  did  not  make  possible  the  distinction  between  analogous 
substances  from  related  plants.  The  quantitative  gradations  in  the  reactions 
corresponding  to  the  gradations  in  phylogenetic  relationship  seemed  to  be 
lacking  entirely  in  the  earlier  experiments,  although  there  was  an  indication  of 
such  gradations  observed  in  the  later  work.  Wells,  Osborne  and  Lewis  used 
in  their  experiments  purified  substances  rather  than  mixtures  of  substances 
as  they  occur  in  ordinary  extracts  from  blood  or  organs.  Their  findings  might 
suggest  that  the  gradations  which  are  so  commonly  observed  in  the  case  of  im- 
mune reactions,  result  from  the  use  of  mixtures  of  antigens  as  they  are  present 
in  the  tissues  and  bodyfluids  of  organisms ;  from  this  point  of  view  the  graded 
relationships  of  different  species  would  depend  upon  differently  constituted, 
quantitatively  graded  mixtures  of  various  substances  which  are  characteristic 
of  these  species,  and  not  on  gradations  in  the  structure  of  a  complex  protein 
or  on  a  combination  of  a  specific  hapten  of  a  non-protein  nature,  which 
differs  in  a  graded  way  in  different  species,  with  the  same  or  a  similar  protein 
serving  as  carrier.  However,  this  conclusion  would  not  be  in  agreement  with 
some  other  well  established  facts.  Thus  we  may  recall  the  immunological 
differences  between  the  whites  of  chicken  and  duck  eggs,  as  shown  in  the 
anaphylaxis  experiments  of  Dakin  and  Dale.  Such  differences  are  graded, 
although  these  investigators  used  crystalline  substances  in  their  experiments ; 
in  this  case,  therefore,  the  gradation  in  the  reactions  must  have  depended 
in  all  probability  on  graded  differences  in  the  chemical  structure  of  single 
substances. 

We  have  seen  that  by  means  of  immunization  it  is  possible  to  demonstrate 


506  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

in  the  sera  of  the  immunized  organism  the  presence  of  immune  substances 
which  react  specifically  with  the  antigens  used  for  their  production,  but  which 
also  react  more  weakly  with  analogous  substances  from  related  species  in  a 
graded  manner,  in  accordance  with  the  graded  relationships  of  the  various 
species.  How  do  preformed  agglutinins  and  hemolysins  behave  in  this  respect  ? 
Do  they  show  the  same  degree  of  specificity  as  do  the  immune  substances? 
There  are  present  in  the  sera  preformed  antibodies  which  react  with  group 
antigens  in  the  erythrocytes.  The  question  now  arises  whether  there  exists  a 
specific  adaptation  between  preformed  antibodies  in  sera,  on  the  one  hand, 
and  erythrocytes  and  other  cells,  on  the  other,  in  accordance  with  the  system- 
atic relationship  of  the  organisms  from  which  the  sera  and  cells  are  derived. 
Such  a  specific  adaptation  would  be  comparable  to  that  which  obtains  be- 
tween constituents  of  the  plasma  and  tissue  coagulins,  and  which  becomes 
manifest  in  the  coagulation  of  the  blood.  We  have  already  discussed  the  fact 
that  a  specifically  graded  relationship  between  blood  sera  and  erythrocytes  of 
various  species,  corresponding  to  the  phylogenetic  relationship,  has  not  yet 
been  demonstrated  by  means  of  hemagglutination.  Marshall  likewise  found 
that  normal  heterogenous  sera  of  goat,  sheep,  goose,  or  rabbit  were  equally 
hemolytic  for  human  and  Macacus  blood.  Landsteiner  observed  that  normal 
hemagglutinins  absorbed  by  certain  erythrocytes  and  then  dissociated  from 
this  combination  by  elution,  are  active  with  the  red  corpuscles  from  numerous 
near  and  distant  species.  Thus  solutions  of  agglutinin  obtained  by  washing 
rabbit  erythrocytes,  which  had  previously  been  agglutinated  by  beef  serum, 
acted  intensely  with  both  rabbit  and  frog  erythrocytes.  Landsteiner  concluded 
therefore  that  agglutination  or  failure  of  agglutination  of  erythrocytes  by  the 
normal  serum  of  another  species  is  almost  independent  of  the  systematic  re- 
lationship of  those  species.  As  far  as  agglutination  of  erythrocytes  is  con- 
cerned, this  lack  of  agreement  is  understandable,  since  within  the  same  species 
corpuscles  from  different  individuals  differ  from  each  other  as  regards  their 
agglutinability  by  the  sera  of  other  individuals  of  the  same  species,  and  since 
not  only  agglutinins  exist  in  the  sera  of  various  species  which  agglutinate 
human  red  corpuscles,  but  heterogenous  sera  in  general  may  agglutinate 
corpuscles  from  other  species,  irrespective  of  systematic  relationship.  Like- 
wise, the  presence  of  Forssman  differentials  and  of  other  antigens  of  a  similar 
kind,  which,  as  we  have  seen,  do  not  conform  to  the  laws  of  systematic  re- 
lationship, may  interfere  with  and  prevent  a  parallelism  between  the  reactions 
of  sera  on  cells  of  a  heterogenous  nature  and  the  systematic  relationship  of 
the  various  species,  genera,  orders  and  classes  of  animals  from  which  the 
sera  and  cells  are  derived.  Thus,  according  to  Klopstock  and  Lehmann- 
Facius,  the  sera  of  species  possessing  Forssman  antigens  dissolve  cells  of 
various  species,  irrespective  of  whether  they  belong  to  the  heterogenetic  or 
the  non-heterogenetic  series ;  on  the  other  hand,  sera  from  non-heterogenetic 
species  dissolve  only  cells  from  heterogenetic  species.  But  in  addition,  another 
factor  may  interfere  with  the  manifestation  of  a  parallelism  between  the 
toxicity  of  heterogenous  sera  and  the  systematic  relationship  of  two  species. 
There  seem  to  occur  in  the  same  serum  multiple  constituents,  each  one  directed 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        507 

against  the  erythrocytes — and  presumably  also  against  other  cells — of  a 
certain  species.  Thus  specificities,  if  they  exist,  may  be  obscured  by  the  ex- 
istence of  a  multiplicity  of  preformed  antibodies  which  may  interfere  with 
one  another.  Accordingly,  Landsteiner  and  Levine  found,  as  stated  above, 
that  a  serum  after  absorption  with  chimpanzee  erythrocytes,  acted  much  less 
on  chimpanzee  than  on  human  blood,  and  the  converse  effect  was  seen  after 
absorption  with  human  blood  cells.  Also,  in  other  instances  when  sera  and 
cells  of  sheep,  goat,  fox  and  dog  were  used,  it  has  been  possible  through 
absorption  with  erythrocytes,  or  in  some  cases,  with  other  cells  of  a  certain 
species,  to  remove  from  a  serum,  in  a  specific  way,  the  agglutinins  acting  on 
the  cells  of  this  species,  while  leaving  behind  the  agglutinins  for  the  erythro- 
cytes of  another  species.  In  some  instances  however,  this  absorption  did  not 
act  in  such  a  specific  manner,  but  with  the  specific  agglutinins  for  the  cells 
of  one  species  there  were  removed  also  those  acting  on  the  cells  of  a  different 
species. 

Furthermore,  when  once  a  definite  threshold  of  strangeness  has  been 
reached,  a  finer  differentiation  among  the  strange  species,  as  to  the  degree  of 
toxicity  of  substances  present  in  their  sera  or  cells,  will  hardly  be  possible. 
This  applies  as  far  as  preformed  substances  in  sera  and  cells  are  concerned, 
but  not  in  the  case  of  immune  sera.  In  a  similar  way,  we  found  that  in 
heterotransplantation  the  conditions  existing  in  the  host  are  so  intensely  in- 
jurious for  the  transplant  that  finer  gradations  in  the  degree  of  injuriousness 
of  different  species,  in  accordance  with  the  systematic  relationship  between 
host  and  transplant,  are  very  difficult  or  even  impossible  to  accomplish. 

As  to  the  effects  of  the  injection  of  foreign  sera  into  the  circulation  of 
rabbits,  we  noticed  that  these  animals  succumb  readily  when  a  certain  amount 
of  the  heterogenous  serum  has  been  injected  with  a  given  rapidity.  But  again, 
different  factors  may  be  responsible  for  such  a  fatal  outcome  in  the  case  of 
sera  from  different  species  and  this  diversity  of  factors  precludes  a  strict 
parallelism  between  the  systematic  relationship  of  the  various  species  used 
and  the  toxicity  of  their  sera.  Thus,  according  to  Strickler,  Tuttle  and  Loeb, 
intravenous  injection  of  dog  serum  kills  the  rabbit,  essentially,  by  the  hemoly- 
sis it  produces  in  the  blood  vessels  of  the  rabbit.  The  products  of  hemolysis 
cause  coagulation  of  the  blood  in  the  living  animal  in  the  same  way  as  in 
vitro.  Accordingly,  the  pulmonary  vessels  and  the  vena  cava  become  filled 
with  blood  clots  and  the  animal  dies  from  asphyxiation.  If  the  formation  of 
blood  clots  is  prevented  by  injection  of  hirudin  or  heparin  into  a  vein  previous 
to  the  injection  of  the  serum,  the  latter  does  not  kill  the  rabbit.  The  heparin 
diminishes  hemolysis  as  well  as  the  coagulation  of  the  blood  (Rabinovitch). 
Beef  serum,  on  the  other  hand,  causes,  in  vitro  as  well  as  in  vivo,  agglutination 
of  the  erythrocytes ;  the  clumps  of  red  corpuscles  formed  occlude  the  pulmo- 
nary vessels  and  death  results.  Directly  after  the  death  of  the  animal  these 
agglutination  thrombi  may  be  demonstrated  by  exerting  pressure  on  the 
pulmonary  vessels,  which  forces  the  thrombi  out  of  the  cut  vessels  (Rabin- 
ovitch). It  is  possible  that  in  addition  to  these  toxic  effects  of  dog  and  beef 
serum,  other  factors  are  involved  in  some  instances;  thus  Zinsser  maintains 


508  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

that  goat  serum  may,  in  certain  cases,  kill  rabbits  by  a  mechanism  comparable 
to  that  which  is  effective  in  anaphylaxis. 

While  these  facts  make  understandable  the  lack  of  a  strict  quantitative 
correlation  between  the  systematic  relationship  of  animals  and  the  action 
of  heterogenous  blood  serum  on  cellular  constituents,  still,  a  specific  adapta- 
tion between  sera  and  the  cellular  elements  does  exist.  This  is  evident  from 
the  fact  that,  as  a  rule,  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  blood  sera  are  much 
more  favorable  for  the  preservation  of  the  cellular  constituents  of  the  blood 
than  are  heterogenous  sera.  This  is  true  also  of  man  and  of  certain  animal 
species  in  which  blood  groups  occur,  if  the  group  agglutinins  are  first  removed 
from  the  blood.  There  are  indications  that  similar  conditions  hold  good  in  the 
case  of  the  blood  of  invertebrates  as  well.  Thus  we  found  the  blood  serum 
of  Limulus  on  the  whole  more  suited  for  the  normal  activities  of  experimental 
amoebocyte  tissue  of  Limulus,  than  the  blood  serum  of  decapode  arthropods, 
such  as  the  lobster.  However,  through  previous  heating  of  lobster  serum  the 
latter  can  be  converted  into  a  favorable  medium.  Furthermore,  Limulus  serum 
on  being  mixed  with  the  serum  of  other  Limuli  remains  clear,  but  after  mixing 
it  with  the  sera  of  various  crustaceans,  precipitates  usually  develop. 

While  thus,  in  general,  no  very  strict  quantitative  parallelism  can  be  dem- 
onstrated between  the  action  of  normal  sera  on  heterogenous  cells  and  the 
relationship  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  species  used,  such  a  specific 
relationship  is  demonstrable  in  the  case  of  immune  sera,  produced  through 
injection  of  sera  or  cells  into  an  animal  possessing  different  organismal  dif- 
ferentials. As  a  rule,  the  antigenic  activity  of  the  species  differentials  pre- 
dominates under  these  conditions  over  that  of  other  antigens  contained  in 
the  cells. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  not  only  in  the  cells  of  an  organism,  but  also  in 
its  blood  serum,  there  are  present  species  differentials  which  can  function  as 
antigens,  and  which,  by  means  of  experimentally  produced  immune  sub- 
stances, can  readily  be  demonstrated ;  also,  that  these  differentials  show  a 
gradation  corresponding  to  the  systematic  relationship  of  the  organisms. 
Moreover,  we  have  found  that  the  cells  of  an  organism  and  its  normal  blood 
plasma  contain  species  differentials  which  are  mutually  adapted  to  each 
other;  but  a  graded  relationship  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  the 
cells  and  bodyfluids  belonging  to  different  species  and  orders  of  animals,  which 
would  correspond  to  the  systematic  relationship  of  the  animals,  cannot  as  a 
general  rule  be  demonstrated  in  the  interaction  between  sera  and  cells. 

In  these  investigations,  which  concern  the  differentiation  of  different  species 
by  serological  methods  in  animals,  substances  and  cells,  which  are  constituents 
of  the  blood,  have  been  used  in  most  experiments.  While  in  plants  substances 
which  are  present  in  young  tissues  may  also  serve  as  species-specific  antigens, 
it  seems  to  have  been  difficult,  so  far,  to  extract  from  organs  of  higher 
animal  species  antigens  which,  after  injection  into  other  species,  would  give 
rise  to  the  production  of  precipitins  or  of  complement-fixing  substances.  Such 
antigens,  if  present  at  all,  are  found  only  in  very  small  quantities  and  show 
only  a  slight  degree  of   specificity.   But,   it  may  be  suspected   that   these 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  SPECIES  DIFFERENTIALS        509 

largely  negative  results  are  due  not  so  much  to  the  lack  of  these  species  differ- 
entials in  the  respective  tissues,  as  to  the  difficulty  experienced  in  extracting 
them  in  a  potent  form,  and  there  are  indications  that,  by  injecting  organ 
suspensions  into  rabbits,  species-specific  antibodies  may  be  obtained.  In  the 
preparation  of  antigens  from  invertebrates  for  the  production  of  precipitins, 
it  is  customary  to  make  extracts  from  the  whole  animal  after  it  has  been 
frozen,  dehydrated  and  ground  to  a  fine  powder;  however,  this  material  con- 
tained tissues  as  well  as  bodyfluids. 

As  we  have  stated  previously,  heterotransplantation  of  various  tissues  and 
organs  shows  the  presence  of  heterodifferentials,  which  are  not  limited  to  one 
kind  of  tissue  but  which  are  distributed  throughout  the  body  similarly  to  the 
individuality  differentials.  But  the  gradations  in  the  results  of  transplantations 
are  not  as  delicate  and  as  definite  in  the  case  of  species  differentials  as  in  the 
case  of  individuality  differentials.  In  that  part  of  the  spectrum  of  relation- 
ships which  represents  the  heterodifferentials,  the  analysis  by  means  of  sero- 
logical methods  is  at  least  equal,  and  probably  superior,  to  the  analysis  by 
means  of  transplantation.  In  the  individuality  differentials,  on  the  other  hand, 
we  have  to  deal  evidently  with  much  more  delicate  and  specific  substances  than 
in  the  species  differentials,  and  here  serological  analysis  is  the  less  refined 
method.  And  yet,  each  species  has  its  characteristic  species  differential.  Is 
this  species  differential  attached  to  a  particular  substance,  which  is  the  same 
in  all  organs  of  a  species,  or  do  different  substances  assume  these  functions 
in  different  organs?  There  is  no  doubt  that  different  substances,  present  in 
different  organs  or  tissues,  may  possess  species  differentials  exhibiting  the 
specific  effects.  The  evidence  so  far  points  strongly  to  the  conclusion  that 
there  is  one  chemical  feature  which  characterizes  a  species  and  that  this  may 
be  attached  to  various  substances,  which  are  thus  the  bearers  of  the  species 
differential ;  and,  as  a  rule,  the  demonstration  of  serological  differences  in  the 
experiments  discussed  in  this  chapter  depended  upon  the  presence  in  the 
proteins  of  this  species  differential  which  served  as  an  antigen.  However,  it 
seems  that  in  some  instances  in  which  certain  plant  proteins  were  used  for  the 
sensitization  of  animal,  tissue-  or  substance-specific  material  may  have  called 
forth  sensitization  and  the  subsequent  anaphylactic  reaction,  and  it  is  probable 
that  also  in  animals  a  combination  of  tissue  and  organ  differentials  may  to  a 
certain  extent,  and  with  certain  limitations,  substitute  for  the  real  species 
differentials. 


Chapter  J 

The  Demonstration  of  Individuality  Differentials 

by  Serological  Methods 

IN  the  preceding  chapter  we  have  discussed  various  investigations  which 
tended  to  prove  the  existence  of  species,  generic  and  class  differentials 
by  means  of  serological  methods.  We  have  seen  that  the  precipitin  test 
in  general  permits  only  the  distinction  of  relatively  far  distant  species,  but 
certain  refinements  in  technique  may  make  it  possible  to  distinguish  also  be- 
tween more  nearly  related  species.  At  an  early  period  of  these  investigations, 
it  was  especially  Hamburger  who  suggested  that  not  only  species  differed  in 
their  chemical  constitution,  but  that  also  individuals  might  differ.  It  was 
therefore  natural  that  the  attempt  should  be  made  to  demonstrate  differences 
between  the  proteins  of  different  individuals  by  means  of  methods  similar  to 
those  used  for  the  demonstration  of  species  differentials.  Weichardt  seems  to 
have  been  the  first  to  make  experiments  of  this  kind.  He  believed  that  he  was 
able  to  demonstrate  individual  differences  in  the  degree  of  precipitation  taking 
place  on  mixing  the  blood  proteins  of  two  individuals  with  their  respective 
antisera,  after  previous  saturation  of  the  antiserum  of  one  with  the  serum  of 
the  other  individual.  The  sera  then  appeared  to  react  more  strongly  with  the 
individual  antigen  used  for  immunization.  Weichardt  used  heterogenous  im- 
mune bodies  in  his  investigations  and  in  the  light  of  what  we  have  since 
learned  concerning  the  limitations  of  the  precipitin  test,  it  is  very  improbable 
that  individuality  differentials  can  be  demonstrated  by  these  means. 

However,  a  few  years  previous  to  this  work  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth, 
using  a  different  technique,  had  actually  shown  the  existence  of  individual 
differences  between  antigens,  in  experiments  to  which  we  have  referred 
already.  But  it  seems  that  these  investigators  were  not  primarily  interested  in 
the  analysis  of  what  we  now  would  designate  as  individuality  differentials; 
they  wished,  rather,  to  determine  whether  immune  substances  could  be  pro- 
duced only  against  heterogenous  substances,  and  whether  a  condition  which 
Ehrlich  had  named  "Horror  autotoxicus"  would  prevent  the  formation  of 
antibodies  in  an  animal  of  the  same  species.  They  therefore  injected  massive 
doses  of  hemolyzed  blood  corpuscles  of  thirteen  goats  into  other  goats  and 
obtained  thirteen  hemolysins  for  the  blood  corpuscles  of  the  individuals  which 
had  served  as  donors  of  the  antigens.  A  comparison  of  the  effects  of  the 
different  immune  sera  on  the  blood  corpuscles  of  the  various  individuals 
showed  that  the  sera  were  not  all  alike,  but  that  each  one  behaved  in  a  dis- 
tinctive manner.  It  could  furthermore  be  shown  that  the  differences  depended 
not  only  on  the  kind  of  corpuscles  injected,  but  also  on  the  animal  which  had 
produced  the  hemolysins.  Thus  two  different  goats,  injected  with  the  same 
goat  blood,  gave  different  hemolysins.   This  corresponds  with  the  results 

510 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      511 

which  are  obtained  in  the  analysis  of  individuality  differentials  by  means  of 
transplantation,  the  reaction  depending  here  not  merely  on  the  nature  of  the 
transplant,  but  on  the  relation  between  the  individuality  differential  of  the 
donor  and  of  the  host.  While  it  was  thus  possible  to  produce  substances  which 
Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth  called  "isolysins" — but  which  would,  perhaps,  better 
be  called  "homoiolysins" — in  no  case  did  such  a  homoiohemolysin  dissolve  the 
erythrocytes  of  the  animal  which  had  produced  that  particular  hemolysin. 
Autohemolysins  did  not  develop  under  these  conditions.  However,  in  some 
goats  it  was  not  possible  to  elicit  the  production  of  homoiohemolysins  in  this 
way;  here  the  injected  homoiogenous  red  corpuscles  behaved  like  autogenous 
cells.  Another  difficulty  was  that  the  antisera  not  only  reacted  with  the  red 
corpuscles  of  the  goat  which  had  furnished  the  antigen,  but  also  with  the 
erythrocytes  of  a  number  of  other  goats.  These  facts  suggested  to  von  Dun- 
gern  and  Hirschfeld,  as  well  as  to  Witebsky,  the  interpretation  that  Ehrlich 
and  Morgenroth  had  in  reality  not  to  deal  with  individual  hemolysins,  but  with 
group  isolysins  corresponding  to  the  group  hemagglutinins,  the  occurrence  of 
which  in  certain  animal  species  had  been  demonstrated  by  von  Dungern  and 
Hirschfeld.  Also,  Zinsser  assumed  that  while  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth  had 
actually  discovered  individual  differences,  between  the  red  corpuscles  of  differ- 
ent goats,  these  individual  differences  were  identical  with  blood-group  differ- 
ences. 

As  discussed  previously,  it  is  necessary  to  distinguish  between  at  least  four 
different  kinds  of  substances:  (1)  The  typical  group  differentials,  which  are 
represented  in  man  by  the  agglutinogens  A  and  B;  (2)  accessory  blood-group 
differentials,  such  as  M,  N,  P,  Rh  and  H;  (3)  substances  which  allow  the 
distinction  of  individuals,  as  for  instance,  individual  scents,  and  also  certain 
tissue  or  organ  differentials,  or  combinations  of  the  latter.  While  a  combina- 
tion of  a  sufficiently  large  number  of  accessory  blood-group  or  organ  differen- 
tials might  permit  the  distinction  between  individuals,  this  would  not  make 
these  individual  differences  necessarily  identical  with  (4)  the  individuality 
differentials.  It  is  difficult  to  determine  whether  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth  had 
to  deal  with  substances  enumerated  under  2,  3,  or  4. 

However  this  may  be,  the  desire  of  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth  to  determine 
the  possibility  of  the  formation  of  "isohemolysins"  suggested  to  them  the 
use  of  a  method  which  allowed  a  much  finer  differentiation  between  in- 
dividuals than  had  been  possible  previously  by  means  of  serological  methods, 
in  particular,  those  in  which  the  ordinary  heterogenous  immune  sera  were 
employed.  These  investigators  anticipated  the  essential  feature  of  the  method 
of  cross  immunization,  subsequently  introduced  by  Uhlenhuth  with  a  view 
of  refining  the  precipitin  test.  Furthermore,  the  use  of  cells  instead  of  blood 
proteins  as  antigens  may  have  been  a  favorable  factor  which  made  possible 
the  demonstration  of  individual  differences  by  serological  methods. 

The  fact  that  homoio  (iso)  hemolysins  can  be  produced  experimentally  was 
subsequently  confirmed  by  Ascoli  and  by  various  other  investigators.  But  the 
most  extensive  and  important  studies  concerning  the  demonstration  of  in- 
dividual differences  between  the  red  blood  corpuscles  of  different  individuals, 


512  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

belonging  to  the  same  species,  were  carried  out  by  Todd  and  White,  and  later 
by  Todd  alone.  We  have  referred  already  to  their  work  and  we  shall  now 
again  discuss  these  investigations.  There  can  be  little  doubt  that  these  latter 
investigators  had  to  deal  with  individual  and  not  with  group  differentials  in 
their  investigations.  Todd  and  White,  and  Todd,  in  preparing  immune  serum 
against  cattle  plague,  injected  different  cattle  with  the  blood  of  other  cattle. 
Out  of  one  hundred  and  six  cattle  injected,  seventy-six  furnished  active  sera 
containing  homoio  (iso)  hemolysins  for  normal  cattle,  which  were  active  in 
combination  with  guinea  pig  complement.  Each  immune  serum  thus  obtained 
was  able  to  hemolyze  the  red  corpuscles  of  certain  other  individual  cattle,  and 
this  action  differed  from  that  of  the  immune  serum  obtained  from  another 
animal.  Thus  a  particular  serum  was  very  hemolytic  for  some  kinds  of 
erythrocytes  and  only  weakly  hemolytic  for  others,  and  each  serum  acted 
in  its  own  specific  way  on  the  various  kinds  of  corpuscles.  The  order  in  which 
two  different  sera  affected  a  series  of  corpuscles  from  different  individuals  was 
different  in  each  case. 

These  individual  variations  between  the  antigens  present  in  the  corpuscles 
of  different  cattle  were  brought  out  still  more  strikingly  in  specific  absorption 
experiments.  If  a  certain  serum  was  exhausted  by  the  addition  of  the  red 
corpuscles  of  an  individual  animal,  it  lost  thereby  not  only  the  ability  to 
hemolyze  the  kind  of  corpuscles  which  had  been  used  for  absorption,  but 
also  the  erythrocytes  of  some  other  individuals ;  moreover,  a  gradation  be- 
tween the  erythrocytes  of  different  individuals  according  to  genetic  relation- 
ship, such  as  had  been  observed  in  transplantation  experiments,  did  not  ap- 
parently exist  here;  it  seemed,  rather,  that  "an  all  or  nothing"  law  obtained. 
But  if  several  immune  sera  were  pooled,  the  absorption  tests  became  more 
specific,  in  so  far  as  now  absorption  with  the  corpuscles  of  one  particular 
animal  removed,  primarily,  the  hemolysins  of  this  individual,  leaving  the 
others  as  a  rule  intact.  Still  it  might  happen  here  also,  that  not  only  the 
hemolysins  for  those  individuals  whose  corpuscles  were  used  for  specific 
absorption  were  removed,  but  also  the  hemolysins  for  some  other  individuals. 
It  appears  that  if  the  relationship  between  two  individuals  did  not  exceed 
a  certain  degree  of  remoteness,  their  erythrocytes  behaved  alike  in  the  ab- 
sorption test,  a  finer  quantitative  gradation  in  the  intensity  of  the  reaction, 
such  as  can  readily  be  accomplished  by  means  of  transplantation,  being  im- 
possible in  this  case.  However,  in  an  indirect  manner,  by  comparing  the  be- 
havior of  the  corpuscles  of  various  individuals  to  different  immune  sera  it 
might  perhaps  have  been  possible  to  establish  the  mutual  relationship  of  the 
corpuscles  of  the  various  individual  cattle,  at  least  in  an  approximate  manner. 

The  same  lack  of  gradation  was  also  apparent  in  the  analysis  of  the  relation- 
ships of  the  members  of  certain  families  by  means  of  the  hemolysis  test.  Thus 
the  blood  corpuscles  of  a  cow  and  her  calf  were  compared  as  to  their  specific 
ability  to  absorb  the  individual  hemolysins.  It  was  found  that  absorption  with 
the  corpuscles  of  the  mother  removed  also  the  hemolysins  for  the  calf,  but 
absorption  with  the  corpuscles  of  the  calf  left  the  hemolysins  of  the  mother 
intact,  while  removing  those  for  its  own  corpuscles.  In  this  case  we  have  to 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      513 

consider  the  possibility  that  in  the  corpuscles  of  the  calf  the  antigens  were 
quantitatively  not  yet  as  fully  developed  as  in  the  corpuscles  of  the  mother. 
Examination  of  a  family  of  sheep,  consisting  of  father,  mother  and  three 
lambs,  showed  that  the  corpuscles  of  one  lamb  behaved  in  an  almost  identical 
manner  with  those  of  the  mother,  while  the  corpuscles  of  the  other  two  lambs 
had  the  character  of  the  father.  Here,  too,  there  is  a  lack  of  gradation,  and 
there  is  again  reason  for  assuming  that  under  similar  conditions  transplanta- 
tion would  in  all  probability  have  revealed  graded  differences  between  the 
constitution  of  the  cells  of  the  various  children  and  of  father  and  mother.  An- 
other peculiarity  in  these  experiments  needs  particular  mention,  namely,  the 
importance  of  the  race  to  which  the  individual  cattle  belonged.  We  should  have 
expected  the  erythrocytes  of  a  certain  individual  to  resemble  more  the  cor- 
puscles of  an  individual  belonging  to  the  same  strain  than  the  corpuscles  of 
an  individual  from  a  different  strain,  but  this  was  apparently  not  the  case.  In 
transplantation  experiments,  on  the  other  hand,  the  differences  existing  be- 
tween different  strains,  such  as  white,  yellow  and  piebald  strains  of  rats,  and 
also  those  between  inbred  strains  of  guinea  pigs  and  mice,  have  a  distinct 
effect  on  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  grafts. 

In  more  recent  experiments  Todd  analyzed  in  a  similar  manner,  individual 
relationships  in  fowl  by  means  of  immune  hemagglutinins.  Here,  too,  it  was 
found  that  by  absorption  tests  the  red  corpuscles  of  each  individual  animal 
could  be  distinguished  from  those  of  others.  Some  erythrocytes  resembled 
each  other  more  than  others ;  but  certain  members  of  the  family  could  not 
be  distinguished  from  one  another  by  this  method.  In  these  experiments  poly- 
valent sera  were  used.  If  they  were  absorbed  with  the  corpuscles  of  one 
individual,  only  immune  substances  directed  against  this  individual  and 
against  some  near  relatives  were  thereby  removed ;  but  if  the  polyvalent  serum 
was  exhausted  with  the  red  corpuscles  of  several  individuals,  the  number  of 
immune  substances  removed  was  greater.  Also,  in  this  case  we  find  a  lack 
of  a  furthergoing  gradation  in  the  relationship  of  the  various  individuals.  In 
analyzing  the  relationship  between  parents  and  children,  Todd  found,  again, 
the  corpuscles  of  some  children  behaving  like  those  of  the  father,  others  like 
those  of  the  mother;  but  in  two  instances  the  antigens  of  the  children  pos- 
sessed components  of  both  father  and  mother.  If  a  polyvalent  serum  is  ab- 
sorbed with  the  erythrocytes  of  both  parents  successively,  it  has  of  course, 
lost  also  the  agglutinins  for  the  cells  of  the  child  completely.  Theoretically, 
the  red  corpuscles  of  the  child  should  have  components  of  the  parents  to  an 
unequal  degree  in  the  large  majority  of  cases.  This  is  found  in  transplanta- 
tion experiments  and  they  suggest  that  there  does  not,  as  a  rule,  exist  an 
identity  between  the  structure  of  the  differentials  of  a  child  and  of  one  of  the 
parents. 

An  indication  that  it  is  perhaps  the  differentials  which  serve  to  distinguish 
the  erythrocytes  of  various  individuals,  and  that  they  also  function  as  antigens 
in  immunization,  was  obtained  in  experiments  in  which  the  production  of 
agglutinins  against  the  blood  corpuscles  of  brothers  and  sisters  was  tested.  In 
each  instance,  Todd  injected  a  chicken  with  the  blood  of  a  brother.  Several 


514  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

pairs  of  this  kind  were  tested  in  this  manner ;  in  two  of  them  antibodies  were 
readily  produced,  whereas  in  two  other  pairs  immunization  was  obtained 
with  greater  difficulty.  In  the  latter  cases,  in  testing  the  agglutinating  power 
of  the  sera  for  the  blood  corpuscles  of  the  two  partners,  almost  no  distinction 
was  found ;  correspondingly,  each  had  very  weak  antigenic  potency  in  the 
partner.  On  the  other  hand,  the  partners  in  the  first  two  pairs  could  be  readily 
differentiated  from  each  other  and,  accordingly,  distinct  effects  were  obtained. 
The  agglutinating  sera  resulting  from  immunization  with  the  erythrocytes  of 
brothers  were  highly  specific  and  acted  only  on  corpuscles  of  birds  very  similar 
to  those  whose  erythrocytes  had  been  used  for  injection ;  but  towards  these 
cells  they  appeared  to  be  as  active  as  the  sera  prepared  by  injection  of  non- 
related  fowls ;  there  was  again  a  lack  of  gradation. 

In  chickens,  individual  differences  were  found  also  by  Landsteiner  and 
Miller,  who  immunized  rabbits  with  chicken  blood.  The  immune  agglutinins 
in  the  rabbit  serum  could  be  absorbed  with  the  red  blood  corpuscles  from  a 
certain  chicken.  The  remaining  rabbit  serum  was  still  able  to  agglutinate  the 
erythrocytes  from  other  chickens  but  not  those  from  the  animal  used  for 
absorption;  only  in  two  pairs  of  chickens  were  the  agglutinins  found  identical 
in  these  tests.  Similarly  in  natural  ox  serum  multiple  substances  seem  to  exist, 
which  are  able  to  agglutinate  the  red  corpuscles  of  individual  chickens. 
Through  absorption  with  the  erythrocytes  of  a  chicken  these  substances  could 
be  specifically  removed.  Ox  serum  thus  treated  no  longer  agglutinated  the 
chicken  corpuscles  used  for  absorption,  although  it  had  retained  the  ability  to 
agglutinate  the  corpuscles  from  other  chickens  (Landsteiner  and  Levine). 
Likewise,  by  injecting  chimpanzees  with  human  erythrocytes,  Landsteiner 
and  Levine  were  able  to  find  some  differences  between  individual  human 
red  corpuscles.  However,  in  the  case  of  turkey  and  guinea  fowl  blood,  in- 
dividual differences  could  not  be  established  by  these  means. 

In  the  experiments  of  Todd,  and  in  similar  investigations  of  others,  as 
well  as  in  the  earlier  experiments  of  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth,  the  question 
arose  as  to  whether  we  have  not  to  deal  with  group  antigens  rather  than  with 
individual  antigens.  Thomoff,  in  experiments  on  the  formation  of  homoio- 
hemolysins  or  homoioagglutinins  in  horses,  suggested  that  reactions  occur 
only  if  the  donor  of  the  antigen  and  the  producer  of  the  immune  substances 
belong  to  different  blood  groups.  However,  even  in  these  experiments  the 
hemolysins  or  agglutinins  were  not  primarily  antibodies  against  the  group 
antigens  of  horses,  but  they  were  individual  agglutinins  and  hemolysins,  al- 
though secondarily  the  group  differentials  may  have  entered  as  a  factor  in  these 
reactions.  Similarly,  it  may  be  possible  that  also  in  Todd's  experiments  the 
group  differentials  may  have  played  a  secondary  role,  but  essentially  these 
experiments  concern  differentials  distinguishing  individuals. 

In  comparing  these  serological  tests  for  individuality  with  the  analysis  of 
the  individuality  differential  by  means  of  transplantation,  we  see  that  in  the 
former  use  is  made  of  the  antigen  of  one  type  of  cell  only,  the  erythrocytes, 
and  the  conclusions  likewise  relate  merely  to  the  differences  between  the 
antigens  in  various  kinds  of  red  blood  cells.  In  transplantation  experiments, 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      515 

on  the  other  hand,  the  character  of  various  tissues  and  organs  of  one  in- 
dividual is  contrasted  with  that  in  another  individual ;  this  is  possible  because 
the  individuality  differential  is  not  merely  an  attribute  of  one  particular  kind 
of  cells,  such  as  the  erythrocytes,  but  is  present  in  the  various  tissues  and 
organs  of  an  individual. 

We  find,  in  general,  in  the  serological  tests  a  lack  of  those  fine  gradations 
between  intensities  of  reaction,  which  correspond  to  the  degrees  of  relation- 
ship of  the  partners,  observed  in  cases  of  transplantation.  In  transplantation 
experiments  the  cells  and  tissues  transferred  to  a  strange  environment  set  in 
motion  finely  graded  cellular  mechanisms  of  attack  in  the  host  and  the  trans- 
plants are  also  acted  upon  by  the  graded  injurious  actions  of  the  host  body- 
fluids.  In  the  experiments  of  Ehrlich  and  Morgenroth,  as  well  as  in  those 
of  Todd,  the  antigens  of  the  red  corpuscles  initiated  the  production  of  im- 
mune hemolysins  or  immune  agglutinins.  On  the  whole,  these  latter  reactions 
resembled  either  autogenous  or  fully  developed  homoiogenous  reactions,  al- 
though in  the  hemolysis  tests  certain  gradations  in  the  intensity  of  hemolysis 
were  found  in  different  combinations  of  corpuscles  and  immune  sera  in  some 
instances,  and  such  gradations  were  apparently  in  accordance  with  the  rela- 
tionship between  the  animal  whose  blood  corpuscles  were  tested  and  the 
animal  serving  as  the  immune-body  producer.  Is  this  difference  between  the 
reactions  following  transplantation  and  the  effects  of  immune  sera  due  to  a 
difference  in  the  differentials  or  antigens  which  participate  in  these  two  tests? 
Presumably  it  depends  largely  on  the  more  finely  graded  reactions  exhibited 
by  living  tissues,  as  compared  with  the  in  vitro  reactions  between  antigen 
and  antibody. 

The  antigens  present  in  the  erythrocytes  are  substances  which  can  be 
partly  or  wholly  neutralized  or  removed  through  absorption  with  the  corre- 
sponding antisera.  When  a  certain  degree  of  relationship  exists  between  the 
donors  of  the  erythrocytes  and  the  various  animals  to  be  injected  with  these 
cells,  the  correspondence  between  the  immune  bodies  and  the  antigens  may  be 
sufficiently  great  to  make  possible  the  complete  removal  of  these  immune  sub- 
stances by  the  erythrocytes  of  the  donor.  These  differences  between  antigens 
may  conceivably  depend  upon  chemical  groups  forming  part  of  one  complex 
substance,  or  perhaps  we  may  have  to  deal  with  distinct  substances.  These 
antigens,  which  ultimately  are  derived  from  genes  situated  in  the  nucleus,  are 
themselves  situated  outside  the  nucleus;  at  least  this  is  the  case  in  the  non- 
nucleated  erythrocytes. 

We  have  seen  that  the  individuality  differentials  are  preformed  and  there  is 
reason  for  assuming  that  they  elicit  homoioreactions  in  transplantation  di- 
rectly, at  least  to  a  large  extent,  and  that  these  reactions  do  not  primarily 
depend  upon  the  formation  of  immune  bodies,  although  secondarily,  immune 
reactions  may  occur.  Similarly,  the  solution  of  the  foreign  blood  corpuscles, 
after  intravenous  injection  into  homoiogenous  hosts,  depends  primarily  upon 
the  incompatibility  between  the  strange  individuality  differentials  of  the 
erythrocytes  and  the  bodyfluids  of  the  host,  and  the  formation  of  immune 
substances  is  a  process  caused  by  this  primary  incompatibility.  While  it  has 


516  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

been  possible  to  produce  homoiogenous  immune  hemolysins  or  immune  hemag- 
glutinins in  goats,  cattle,  chickens,  and  perhaps  in  some  other  species,  accord- 
ing to  Todd  it  is  not  possible  to  obtain  a  corresponding  formation  of  homoiog- 
enous immune  bodies  in  guinea  pigs  and  rats;  but  these  are  exactly  the 
species  which,  above  all,  have  been  used  in  transplantation  experiments  and 
this  is  an  additional  reason  for  assuming  that  in  the  case  of  homoiogenous 
transplantation  we  have  primarily  to  deal  with  incompatibilities  between  host 
and  transplant,  and  with  primary  reactions  of  attack  or  defense,  and  only 
secondarily  with  immune  reactions. 

As  we  have  pointed  out  above,  in  those  experiments  in  which  individual 
differences  between  cells  could  be  demonstrated  by  serological  methods, 
homoio-immunization  was  used  in  the  preparation  of  the  immune  sera  in  the 
majority  of  the  experiments,  and  in  all  cases  erythrocytes  or  their  derivatives 
served  as  antigens.  There  is,  however,  at  least  one  instance  on  record  in  which 
apparently  hetero-immunization  with  another  type  of  cells  also  led  to  the 
demonstration  of  individual  differences.  According  to  Dervieux,  by  means 
of  repeated  injections  of  fresh  human  sperm  into  rabbits,  antisperm  precipitins 
can  be  produced,  which  have  the  strongest  effect  on  the  individual  sperm  of 
the  donor;  here  they  are  effective  in  the  greatest  dilution.  Dervieux  found, 
furthermore,  that  the  immune  serum  thus  obtained  had  a  stronger  precipitating 
power  for  strange  human  sera  than  immune  sera  produced  by  injection  of 
human  serum;  also,  it  allowed  the  distinction  between  individuals,  and  even 
between  men  and  women.  However,  the  spermatic  fluid  used  by  Dervieux,  and 
also  in  the  subsequent  investigations  of  Siissman,  contained  not  only  sperma- 
tozoa but  also  other  material,  among  which  were  admixed  proteins.  Therefore, 
the  immune  substances  elicited  by  the  injection  of  sperm  may  readily  have 
been  directed  against  these  admixtures  rather  than  against  the  spermatozoa  as 
such.  These  experiments  were  apparently  confirmed  by  Siissman  as  far  as  the 
individual  specificity  of  the  sperm  antigens,  but  not  of  the  blood  protein 
antigens,  is  concerned.  But  it  seems  that  Siissman  carried  out  only  a  small 
number  of  experiments  and  not  all  of  these  were  confirmatory  of  Dervieux's 
conclusions,  It  will  therefore  be  necessary  to  wait  for  a  confirmation  of 
Dervieux's  investigations  before  his  results  can  be  fully  accepted. 

More  recently,  Zangemeister  indicated  another  method  by  means  of  which 
he  thought  it  possible  to  differentiate  between  the  blood  sera  even  of  nearly 
related  individuals.  He  assumed  that  following  fertilization  of  the  ovum  by 
a  spermatozoon  and  the  subsequent  formation  of  the  embryo,  there  develop, 
as  the  result  of  the  entrance  of  sperm  material  into  the  blood  serum  of  the 
mother  and  of  the  child,  substances  which  cause  a  change  in  the  state  of 
dispersion  of  the  serum  proteins  if  the  serum  of  the  father  is  mixed  with  the 
serum  of  the  mother,  or  if  the  serum  of  one  of  the  parents  is  mixed  with 
that  of  the  child.  This  change  in  the  state  of  the  serum  proteins  was  thought 
to  indicate  the  relationship  between  the  individuals  whose  sera  were  allowed 
to  act  on  each  other.  However,  these  experiments  could  not  be  confirmed 
by  Lattes. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  it  is  possible  to  produce  specific  immune  sub- 


DEMONSTRATION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  DIFFERENTIALS      517 

stances  through  immunization  with  homoiogenous  erythrocytes,  but  that  a 
hemolytic  immune  serum  thus  obtained  does  not  hemolyze  the  red  corpuscles 
of  the  individual  in  which  the  immune  serum  developed.  It  is  therefore  im- 
possible to  elicit  a  reaction  against  autogenous  cells.  Similarly,  Ehrlich  and 
Morgenroth  have  shown  that  antihemolysins  cannot  be  made  to  appear  by 
injecting  isohemolysins  into  a  goat  in  which  the  hemolysins  had  originated. 
Likewise  in  the  case  of  tumor  immunity,  we  have  seen  that  an  active  im- 
munity against  the  growth  of  a  transplanted  tumor  will  not  result  from 
inoculating  an  animal  with  pieces  of  its  own  organs. 

However,  it  has  been  held  that  in  certain  cases  autogenous  antibodies  may 
actually  be  formed,  but  not  all  the  authors  distinguish  sharply  between  sub- 
stances and  reactions  of  an  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  nature,  and  it  is 
thus  difficult  to  determine  whether  we  have  actually  to  deal  with  autogenous 
rather  than  with  homoiogenous  reactions.  To  mention  some  examples : 
According  to  Guyer,  an  injury  to  the  eye-lens  of  a  rabbit  elicits  in  this  animal 
the  production  of  antibodies  against  lens  tissue  which  enters  the  blood  serum; 
these  antibodies  can  be  demonstrated  by  the  formation  of  a  precipitate  on 
mixing  the  serum  of  the  animal  which  has  been  injured  with  homoiogenous 
lens  substance.  Similarly,  according  to  Henshaw,  antibodies  develop  against 
autogenous  antigens  after  exposure  of  the  skin  to  ultraviolet  rays ;  either  by 
means  of  anaphylactic  shock  or  by  the  precipitin  reaction  with  corresponding 
homoiogenous  skin  material,  the  development  of  antibodies  could  apparently 
be  demonstrated.  In  these  cases  we  may  perhaps  have  to  deal  with  tissues, 
which,  as  a  result  of  injury,  had  undergone  chemical  changes  of  a  kind  which 
seem  to  have  made  possible  the  formation  of  auto-antibodies.  This  applies 
also  to  the  experiment  of  Letterer,  who,  by  injection  of  autogenous  venous 
blood,  sensitized  a  guinea  pig  against  its  own  blood,  which  caused  a  reaction 
when  injected  parenterally.  Apparently  the  normal  circulating  blood  does  not 
cause  such  a  sensitization. 

In  the  case  of  paroxysmal  hemoglobinuria,  pathological  changes  of  a  specific 
kind  have  evidently  taken  place  in  the  blood  of  certain  individuals.  As  a 
consequence  of  these  changes,  it  seems  that  autohemolysins  develop,  and  the 
union  between  erythrocytes  and  autohemolysin  which  follows  depends  on  an 
exposure  of  the  erythrocytes  to  a  low  temperature.  But  it  is  not  certain  that 
in  this  instance  there  is  actually  involved  an  antibody  formation  against 
autogenous  cells.  Certain  non-specific  procedures,  such  as  injection  of  boiled 
milk,  apparently  intensify  the  autohemagglutination  in  some  rabbits,  but 
injection  of  erythrocytes,  normal  or  injured,  does  not  have  a  corresponding 
effect. 

In  general,  it  may  therefore  be  assumed  that  the  body  does  not  react  against 
its  own  normal  cells  with  the  production  of  immune  substances,  while  it  is 
able  to  do  so  against  homoiogenous  substances.  However,  we  cannot  exclude 
the  possibility  that  if  a  body  is  injected  with  its  own  injured  cells,  in  certain 
cases  a  reaction  may  be  elicited,  but  that  such  a  reaction  is  less  strong  than  one 
produced  by  means  of  injections  of  homoiogenous,  or  better  still,  of  heterog- 
enous material;  furthermore,  it  is  possible  that  substances  of  an  autogenous 


518  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

nature,  not  normally  circulating  in  the  bodyfluids,  may  call  forth  the  produc- 
tion of  immune  substances  if  they  gain  access  to  the  circulation. 

It  may  then  be  concluded  that  in  the  erythrocytes  of  several  species  the 
presence  of  differentials  of  an  individual  character  has  been  established  by 
means  of  immune  sera,  but  it  has  not  yet  been  definitely  proved  that  these 
differentials  are  identical  with  the  individuality  differentials.  Even  in  some 
preformed  sera,  such  as  ox  serum,  multiple  agglutinins  seem  to  exist,  which 
can  be  specifically  absorbed  by  the  erythrocytes  of  certain  individuals.  This 
fact  may  be  interpreted  as  indicating  that  complexities  in  the  structure  of 
blood  proteins  exist,  which  have  not  yet  been  amenable  to  a  purely  chemical 
analysis. 


Chapter  4. 

The  Organismal  Differentials  of  Hybrids 
Between  Nearly  Related  Species 

In  all  conditions  which  we  have  studied  so  far,  in  which  serological 
methods  have  been  used  for  the  analysis  of  relationship,  we  were  able 
to  compare  the  results  with  those  obtained  by  means  of  transplantation. 
There  is,  however,  one  type  of  relationship  in  which  such  a  comparison 
between  these  two  methods  of  investigation  is  not  feasible  at  present.  The 
mutual  relations  of  hybrids  between  nearly  related  species,  as  well  as 
the  relations  between  the  hybrids  themselves  and  their  parents,  have  been 
analyzed  by  serological  methods,  but  only  in  a  rudimentary  manner  by 
transplantation  methods;  the  number  of  experiments  representing  the  latter, 
made  by  Schultz,  is  very  small.  As  Jacques  Loeb  has  pointed  out,  a  comparison 
of  the  species  characteristics  of  an  Fx  hybrid  with  those  of  the  father  and 
mother  species  should  give  an  indication  as  to  whether  the  rules  of  Men- 
delian  heredity  apply  to  the  transmission  of  species  characters,  or  whether 
hereditary  transmission  in  this  case  takes  place  through  the  cytoplasm  of  the 
egg.  If  it  takes  place  through  the  cytoplasm,  the  hybrid  should  resemble  the 
mother  species,  but  not  the  father  species.  Jacques  Loeb  suggested  that  it 
might  also  be  possible  to  determine  this  question  by  comparing  the  characteris- 
tics of  hemoglobin  crystals  of  mule  with  those  of  horse  and  donkey.  But  the 
measurements  of  Brown  showed  that  the  mule  crystals  were  outside  the 
range  of  figures  found  for  horse  as  well  as  for  donkey,  although  they  were 
somewhat  more  nearly  related  to  those  of  the  donkey.  Thus  crystallography 
did  not  help  in  solving  this  problem. 

I.  In  order  to  test  the  relationship  between  horse,  donkey,  and  the  hybrid 
between  these  two  species,  the  mule,  use  was  made  by  Walsh  of  the  presence 
of  preformed  hemolysins  and  hemagglutinins  in  these  three  types  of  sera 
acting  on  the  various  kinds  of  erythrocytes,  while  Landsteiner  employed  for 
this  purpose  immune  agglutinins.  The  findings  of  Walsh  were  as  follows : 
(a)  Horse  serum  does  not  hemolyze  horse,  donkey  or  mule  erythrocytes.  Don- 
key serum  hemolyzes  both  horse  and  mule  erythrocytes  in  a  large  percentage 
of  cases.  Mule  serum  does  not  hemolyze  horse  or  mule  erythrocytes,  (b) 
Horse  serum  agglutinates  neither  horse  nor  mule  erythrocytes.  Donkey  serum 
agglutinates  the  erythrocytes  of  the  horse  in  a  high  percentage  of  cases,  but 
does  not  agglutinate  the  erythrocytes  of  the  mule.  Mule  serum  does  not  ag- 
glutinate horse  or  mule  erythrocytes.  From  these  observations  it  may  be  con- 
cluded that  mule  serum  behaves  like  horse  serum,  and  mule  corpuscles  behave 
like  horse  corpuscles  rather  than  like  donkey  corpuscles,  except  as  far  as 
the  agglutinating  action  of  donkey  serum  is  concerned.  However,  according 

519 


520  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  Landsteiner,  donkey  serum  does  agglutinate  mule  corpuscles,  although  not 
to  the  same  degree  as  horse  corpuscles.  Agglutination  tests  indicate,  therefore, 
that  mule  blood  behaves  essentially  like  horse  blood,  but  in  some  respects 
it  shows  the  influence  of  the  donkey.  It  seems,  then,  that  in  this  species  hybrid 
the  characteristics  of  the  female  parent  predominate,  suggesting  the  possi- 
bility that  we  may  have  to  deal  at  least  with  a  partial  cytoplasmic  inheritance. 

Landsteiner  wished  to  determine  whether  the  blood  groups  which  are  pres- 
ent in  the  horse,  and  lacking  in  the  donkey,  are  transmitted  to  the  mule.  Von 
Dungern  and  Hirschfeld  had  previously  observed  that  the  isoagglutinins  of 
the  horse  are  transmitted  to  the  mule.  In  the  donkey,  isoagglutinins  are 
not  demonstrable.  By  means  of  immune  sera  and  absorption  tests  Land- 
steiner and  Van  der  Scheer  found  in  the  erythrocytes  of  the  horse  more  than 
three  kinds  of  isoagglutinable  substances.  The  mule  inherits  from  the  horse 
isoagglutinable  groups,  but  not  all  the  blood  groups  are  equally  transmitted 
from  horse  to  mule.  The  blood  of  the  majority  of  mules  belongs  to  the  class  in 
which  the  serum  contains  agglutinins,  and  the  corpuscles  are  not,  or  only 
slightly,  agglutinable.  Not  as  many  mules  contain  the  isoagglutinable  sub- 
stances as  do  horses;  this  agrees  with  the  fact  that  donkey  blood  contains  no 
blood  groups  with  isoagglutinable  erythrocytes.  There  is  therefore,  again, 
an  influence  of  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  donkey  noticeable  in  the  mule 
so  far  as  the  inheritance  of  the  blood  groups  is  concerned.  But  horse  ag- 
glutinogens are  transmitted  to  mule  corpuscles,  which  lead  to  heteroagglutina- 
tion  of  mule  corpuscles  by  donkey  serum.  Donkey  serum  behaves  therefore  in 
the  same  way  to  a  certain  group  of  horse  and  mule  corpuscles ;  however,  it 
does  not  cause  the  agglutination  of  mule  corpuscles  to  the  same  degree  as  it 
does  that  of  horse  corpuscles,  and  there  are  more  individual  differences  in 
the  erythrocytes  of  the  mule  than  in  those  of  the  horse.  Likewise,  there  are 
differences  between  different  donkey  sera,  but  a  given  serum  behaves  in  a 
similar  manner  to  horse  and  mule  corpuscles. 

We  find  thus,  that  also  in  this  instance  mule  blood  resembles,  on  the  whole, 
horse  blood ;  but  to  a  certain  degree  an  influence  of  the  donkey  is  noticeable 
and  it  modifies  the  inheritance  in  the  mule.  We  may  furthermore  conclude 
that  there  are  differences  in  individual  mules.  Of  two  mules,  the  one  inherits  a 
characteristic  from  the  horse,  while  another  inherits  the  corresponding  char- 
acteristic from  the  donkey ;  yet  both  are  equally  mules.  The  hybrid  character 
"mule"  is  therefore  distinct  from  and  independent  of  those  individual  char- 
acteristics which  differ  in  different  mules,  some  of  which  resemble,  as  far  as 
this  particular  characteristic  is  concerned,  more  the  horse,  while  others  re- 
semble more  the  donkey.  The  species  differentials  that  distinguish  horse, 
donkey  and  mule  are  definite,  although  some  of  the  mosaic  characteristics 
of  individual  horses  and  donkeys  may  vary,  and  the  composite  of  these 
characteristics  also  differs  in  individual  mules. 

As  to  the  analysis  of  mule  blood  by  means  of  immune  sera,  Landsteiner 
and  Van  der  Scheer  found  that  while  it  might  be  possible  to  use  the  precipitin 
and  complement  fixation  tests  for  the  differentiation  of  the  serum  proteins 
of  these  three  types  of  animals,  the  differences  established  by  such  methods 


ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  OF  HYBRIDS  521 

were  relatively  slight  and  these  investigators  preferred  therefore  the  use  of 
immune  agglutinins,  which  they  produced  in  rabbits  by  injection  of  the  dif- 
ferent types  of  red  corpuscles.  They  tested  the  immune  sera  thus  obtained  as 
to  their  action  on  the  erythrocytes  of  horse,  donkey  and  mule,  either  directly 
or  after  previous  absorption  of  the  immune  sera  by  the  various  types  of 
erythrocytes.  All  of  these  tests  showed  that  the  mule  erythrocytes  contained 
agglutinogens  of  both  horse  and  donkey.  However,  in  the  mule  red  corpuscles, 
either  not  all  of  the  donkey  and  horse  agglutinogens  were  present,  or  they  were 
present  in  smaller  amounts.  As  a  rule,  the  immune  serum  prepared  in  rabbits 
by  injection  of  mule  erythrocytes  behaved  more  like  anti-horse-corpuscle  im- 
mune serum  than  like  anti-donkey  immune  serum,  notwithstanding  the  fact 
that  the  mule  red  corpuscles  contain  both  kinds  of  agglutinogens.  Horse  as  well 
as  mule  erythrocytes  could  bind  the  immune  agglutinins  from  immune  serum 
against  mule  corpuscles,  including  also  the  agglutinins  which  act  on  donkey 
erythrocytes;  but  after  a  previous  absorption  of  such  sera  by  donkey  red 
corpuscles,  a  high  agglutinin  titer  for  horse  and  mule  erythrocytes  still 
remained  in  the  serum,  while  the  donkey  agglutinins  had  been  removed.  It 
may  therefore  be  concluded  that  as  far  as  the  production  of  immune  sera  can 
be  used  as  an  indicator,  the  horse  agglutinogens  predominate  in  the  red  cor- 
puscles of  the  mule. 

II.  More  recently  Landsteiner  studied,  by  means  of  immune  hemolysins 
and  immune  hemagglutinins,  the  relations  of  the  blood  of  hybrids  between 
the  domestic  guinea  pig  (Cavia  rufescens)  and  the  wild  Brazilian  guinea  pig 
(Cavia  porcellus)  to  the  blood  of  the  parent  species.  In  this  case  Landsteiner 
made  use  of  homoio-immunization  in  order  to  eliminate  the  complication 
which  the  strangeness  between  the  donor  of  the  blood  and  the  animal  to  be 
immunized  would  have  introduced.  Normally,  no  hemolysins  or  hemag- 
glutinins are  present  in  the  blood  serum  of  guinea  pigs  belonging  to  one 
species  or  race  for  the  erythrocytes  of  the  other.  But  by  injecting  the  blood 
corpuscles  of  Cavia  porcellus  into  Cavia  rufescens  it  is  possible  to  produce 
immune  hemolysins  and  immune  agglutinins  in  the  serum  of  the  latter,  which 
act  on  the  erythrocytes  of  Cavia  porcellus,  but  not,  as  a  rule,  on  the  red  cor- 
puscles of  Cavia  rufescens.  It  was  found  that  the  red  corpuscles  of  the  hy- 
brid behaved  in  an  intermediate  way;  they  contained  characteristics  of  both 
parents.  This  result  corresponds  to  our  findings  in  the  analysis  of  hybrids 
between  different  families  in  rats  and  in  guinea  pigs  by  means  of  transplanta- 
tion. 

III.  Irwin  tested,  by  means  of  immune  hemagglutinins,  the  relations  be- 
tween the  domestic  Ring  dove  ( Streptopelia  risoria),  the  Asiatic  Pearlneck 
(Spilopelia  chinensis),  and  the  hybrids  between  these  two  genera.  Rabbits 
were  immunized  separately  against  the  red  corpuscles  of  the  two  parents  and 
of  the  hybrid  and  use  was  made  of  the  absorption  of  the  specific  antibodies 
by  the  various  kinds  of  erythrocytes.  It  was  found  that  the  agglutinogens 
of  both  parents  were  present  in  the  erythrocytes  of  the  hybrid,  and  that  also 
in  the  immune  serum  against  the  corpuscles  of  the  hybrid,  agglutinins  against 
the  corpuscles  of  both  parents  could  be  demonstrated.  However,  the  erythro- 


522  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

cytes  of  the  hybrid  either  did  not  possess  all  the  antigens  of  the  parental 
genera,  or  they  did  not  possess  them  in  the  same  quantity  as  the  corpuscles 
of  the  parents.  An  additional  interesting  observation  was  the  following: 
when  the  anti-hybrid  rabbit  serum  was  absorbed  by  the  erythrocytes  of  both 
parents  in  succession  there  still  remained  in  the  immune  serum  a  remnant 
of  agglutinin,  which  could  not  be  removed  by  such  absorption ;  and  further- 
more, after  absorption  of  the  anti-hybrid  immune  serum  by  the  red  corpuscles 
of  one  of  the  parents,  there  still  remained  a  greater  amount  of  agglutinin 
against  the  erythrocytes  of  the  hybrid  than  against  those  of  the  other  parental 
genus.  Irwin  concludes  that  a  new  antigen  (agglutinogen)  must  have  devel- 
oped in  the  erythrocytes  of  the  hybrid  as  a  result  of  fertilization,  and  that  a 
new  agglutinin  may  thus  be  produced  in  the  immune  serum.  A  combination 
of  the  gene  sets  belonging  to  the  two  parent  genera  would,  therefore,  give 
rise  to  something  different  from  both  component  sets.  Furthermore,  it  may  be 
stated  that  the  haploid  number  of  chromosomes  present  in  the  germ  cells  of 
each  of  the  parents  is  evidently  able  to  produce  in  the  hybrid  almost  the 
same  amount  of  antigenic  substance  as  the  diploid  number  does  in  each  of  the 
parents. 

Subsequently,  Irwin  and  Cole  investigated,  by  similar  methods,  the  ag- 
glutinogens in  the  backcross  generation  from  hybrid  F1  (Ring  dove  X 
Pearlneck)  to  Ring  dove  parent  ("one-fourth  Pearlneck").  In  addition,  the 
"one-eighth  Pearlneck"  backcross  generation  was  studied ;  these  were  obtained 
by  mating  the  one-fourth  Pearlneck  backcross  a  second  time  to  a  Ring  dove 
parent.  In  these  backcross  hybrids  a  separation  of  the  pearlneck  genes  took 
place,  so  that  all  possible  random  combinations  were  found,  according  to 
the  rules  of  Mendelian  segregation.  The  presence  or  absence  of  Pearlneck 
agglutinogens  in  the  two  backcross  generations  was  tested  as  usual  by  the 
anti-hybrid  Fx  rabbit  serum  which  had  been  exhausted  once  or  twice  by 
various  types  of  erythrocytes.  The  results  showed  that  in  the  Pearlneck 
erythrocytes  multiple,  and  at  least  ten,  agglutinogens  are  present,  which  are 
distributed  in  a  specific  way  in  the  backcross  birds,  so  that  each  individual 
can  be  differentiated  from  the  others,  if  a  sufficient  number  of  agglutination 
tests  are  made  with  anti-Fx  hybrid  (Ring  dove  X  Pearlneck)  rabbit  serum, 
after  certain  agglutinins  have  been  absorbed  with  various  kinds  of  erythro- 
cytes. Besides,  there  was  present  in  many,  but  not  in  all,  of  the  backcross  in- 
dividuals the  newly  formed  hybridL  agglutinogen,  which  did  not  exist  in  the 
erythrocytes  of  either  parent,  but  formed  as  a  result  of  the  union  of  the  genes 
of  both  parents  in  the  Fx  generation. 

However,  these  results  were  obtained  only  if  immune  serum  from  a  certain 
rabbit  was  used  for  these  tests.  An  immune  serum  from  another  rabbit  might 
have  given  different  results,  and  it  is  conceivable  that  if  the  immune  sera  had 
been  used  from  a  different  species,  additional  differentiations  would  have 
appeared  and  the  number  of  agglutinogens  found  in  the  Pearlneck  erythro- 
cytes would  have  been  still  further  increased.  Moreover,  the  question  may 
be  asked  as  to  whether  these  species-specific  multiple  agglutinogens  which 
were  present  in  the  erythrocytes  were  peculiar  to  these  cells,  or  whether  they 


ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  OF  HYBRIDS  523 

were  found  also  in  the  cells  of  other  tissues  and  organs.  In  the  first  named 
possibility  we  would  have  to  deal  with  species-specific  organ  or  tissue  differen- 
tials. However,  of  special  interest  is  the  formation,  in  the  hybrids,  of  a  new 
agglutinogen,  which  is  not  present  in  the  erythrocytes  of  either  parent.  This 
would  indicate  that  new  combinations  of  genes  may  give  rise  not  only  to 
corresponding  combinations  of  substances  which  are  present  in  the  parents, 
but  also  to  new  substances  which  are  not  represented  by  any  of  the  genes 
as  such,  but  which  depend  upon  the  way  in  which  the  genes  are  sorted  out. 

In  these  various  experiments  we  have  to  deal  with  different  generic  or 
species  (or  race)  differentials  in  the  parents  and  with  combinations  of  such 
differentials  in  the  hybrids.  In  the  hybrids  we  note  in  all  instances  characteris- 
tics transmitted  from  both  of  the  parents.  In  the  mule,  as  well  as  in  the 
hybrids  between  Ring  dove  and  Pearlneck  dove,  it  was  observed  that  the 
hybrid  red  corpuscles  contained  combinations  of  the  parental  characters, 
either  in  smaller  amounts  or  in  the  same  complete  assortment  as  the  erythro- 
cytes of  the  parent  species.  On  the  other  hand,  it  may  be  recalled  that  by 
means  of  serological  methods  Todd  found  that  the  individuality  differentials 
of  children  within  the  same  race  and  species  resembled  either  those  of  the 
father  or  those  of  the  mother. 

Furthermore,  it  would  seem  that  some  characteristics  of  the  hybrids  are 
constant  and  common  to  all  individuals  of  the  hybrid  generation,  while  others 
are  variable  and  may  differ  in  different  hybrids  derived  from  the  same  parents. 
To  the  latter  class  belong,  for  instance,  the  blood-group  characteristics ; 
neither  these  nor  their  precursors  can,  as  such,  constitute  or  be  a  significant 
part  of  the  species  or  hybrid  differential.  Also,  the  individual  hybrids  between 
domestic  and  wild  Brazilian  guinea  pigs  varied  greatly  in  certain  characteris- 
tics other  than  in  those  determining  species  or  race,  and  behaved  in  this  respect 
similar  to  the  hybrids  between  inbred  families  of  rats  and  guinea  pigs  when 
they  were  analyzed  by  means  of  transplantation ;  here  also,  all  kinds  of 
quantitatively  graded,  intermediate  conditions  could  be  established  in  the  trans- 
mission of  the  individuality  differentials. 

An  experiment  similar  to  those  reported  in  this  chapter  and  dealing  with 
animal  species  has  more  recently  been  performed  by  O.  Moritz  with  plant 
species.  He  crossed  Berberis  empetri folia  with  Berberis  Darwinii  and  thus 
obtained  the  species  hybrid,  Berberis  stenophylla.  He  then  sensitized  animals 
by  injecting  extracts  from  the  leaves  and  young  shoots  of  these  three  kinds  of 
plants  and  by  means  of  the  anaphylaxis  reaction  he  could  show  that  the  hybrid 
antigen  contained  constituents  of  both  parent  species.  This  experiment  repre- 
sents only  a  beginning  in  the  analysis  of  plant  hybrids  by  serological  methods, 
but  the  results  so  far  indicate  that  similar  modes  of  distribution  of  the  parent 
differentials  in  species  hybrids  will  probably  be  found  in  plants  and  in 
animals. 


Chapter  5 

On  the  Differences  between  the  Reactions  of 

Foetal  or  Newborn  Organisms  and  of  Adult 

Organisms  Against  Strange  Differentials  as 

Established  by  Serological  Methods 

In  a  preceding  chapter  we  have  discussed  the  differences  in  reactions 
between  very  young  and  older  guinea  pigs  or  of  embryonal  organisms 
against  various  homoiotransplanted  tissues.  The  reactions  against  foetal 
or  embryonal  tissues  have  also  been  studied.  In  general,  the  reactions  on 
the  part  of  very  young  organisms  were  definitely  diminished  in  intensity. 
As  far  as  those  of  young  guinea  pigs  towards  homoiotransplants  are  con- 
cerned, this  difference  is  due  especially  to  a  diminished  intensity  of  the  host 
connective  tissue  response  towards  the  graft.  The  lymphocytic  reaction  may 
be  quite  pronounced,  although  it  may  appear  at  a  relatively  late  date ;  this  may 
be  due  to  the  fact  that  the  transplant,  being  less  injured  by  connective  tissue, 
is  able  to  exert  a  more  marked  effect  on  the  lymphocytes.  We  have  also  re- 
ferred to  the  transplantations  of  heterogenous  tumors  into  the  allantois  of 
developing  chick  embryos,  where  at  early  stages  the  reactions  against  hetero- 
differentials  are  lacking.  Similarly,  it  has  been  shown  by  various  investigators 
that  the  reactions  against  transplanted  tumors  may  not  be  so  great  in  newborn 
animals  and  in  early  life  as  later.  Blumenthal  has  shown  that  early  stages 
of  embryos  do  not  yet  contain  fully  developed  organismal  differentials. 

It  is  of  interest  to  compare  with  these  findings  the  data  supplied  by  sero- 
logical methods.  Roessle  immunized  rabbits  with  mammalian  and  avian  em- 
bryonal tissues  and  found  that  these  tissues  were  just  as  effective  as  antigens 
as  were  red  corpuscles  of  adult  animals  in  the  production  of  hemolysins  and 
also  of  agglutinins ;  there  was  no  difference  in  this  respect  between  embryonal 
and  adult  tissues.  On  the  other  hand,  injection  of  pig  embryo  did  not  lead 
to  the  production  of  precipitins.  The  subsequent  experiments  of  Braus  also 
showed  that  injection  of  larval  and  embryonal  amphibian  tissues  into  rabbits 
did  not  lead  to  precipitin  formation  for  either  foetal  or  adult  tissues,  while 
injection  of  adult  tissue  produced  precipitins  which  reacted  with  adult  but  not 
with  embryonal  tissue.  He  showed  furthermore,  that  even  tissue  from  an 
advanced  stage  of  embryonal  development  which,  when  serving  as  host,  no 
longer  permitted  a  heterotransplant  to  grow,  did  not  yet  elicit  the  production  of 
precipitin.  We  see,  then,  that  while  embryonal  tissue  may  not  possess  antigen 
sufficient  for  precipitin  formation,  it  may  possess  antigen  which  is  able  to 
call  forth  the  production  of  hemolysins  and  agglutinins.  Similarly,  Uhlenhuth 
found  that  while  serum  of  adult  chickens  gave  a  positive  reaction  with  anti- 

524 


REACTIONS  OF  NEWBORN  AND  ADULT  ORGANISMS    525 

chicken  serum,  the  blood  of  young  chickens  did  not  contain  an  active  antigen 
which,  when  mixed  with  the  precipitin  of  the  immune  serum,  induced  forma- 
tion of  a  precipitate.  Kritschewski  noted  that  a  substance  obtained  from  nine- 
week-old  tadpoles  of  Rana  esculenta  can  be  differentiated  in  its  antigenic 
function  from  the  substance  of  adult  frogs  by  means  of  the  complement  fixa- 
tion test,  and  he  likewise  observed  that  the  Forssman  antigen,  which  is  present 
in  the  erythrocytes  and  organs  of  adult  chickens,  is  not  yet  present  in  the  tgg 
and  in  very  young  embryos,  but  that  it  forms  four  days  after  the  beginning  of 
segmentation,  when  a  more  advanced  embryonal  stage  has  been  reached. 

These  experiments,  indicating  that  antigens  develop  only  gradually  during 
embryonal  life,  agree  with  the  findings  mentioned  previously  concerning  the 
blood-group  differentials,  which  seem  to  begin  to  form  prior  to  the  sixth 
month  of  pregnancy,  but  reach  their  full  development  only  at  about  the  time 
of  puberty.  It  is  necessary  to  select  an  especially  active  isoagglutinin  in  order 
to  effect  the  agglutination  of  young  as  compared  with  older  blood  corpuscles. 
Likewise,  the  two  different  varieties  of  the  A  differential,  A  and  A1  (Thorn- 
sen),  or  Ax  and  A2  (Landsteiner),  which  differ  in  their  binding  power  for 
isoagglutinin,  gain  their  full  strength  only  gradually  with  advancing  childhood. 
While  thus,  in  the  course  of  time,  the' blood  corpuscles  acquire  properties 
which  enable  them  to  bind  a  greater  quantity  of  isoagglutinin,  the  difference 
in  the  ability  of  the  A  and  Ax  corpuscles  to  combine  with  isoagglutinin  re- 
mains preserved  also  at  later  periods. 

Similarly,  according  to  Thomsen,  the  full  development  of  the  isoagglutinin 
occurs  only  sometime  between  the  fifth  and  tenth  year  of  life,  while  in  old 
age  it  may  decrease  again  (Schiff  and  Mendlovitsch).  Also,  the  natural 
amboceptor  and  complement  of  hemolysin,  as  well  as  the  corresponding  sub- 
stances acting  with  bacterial  substances,  are  not  yet  present  in  the  earliest 
embryos,  but  form  as  embryonal  life  progresses  in  chicken  and  cattle  (Sachs, 
Rywosch).  In  the  chicken  embryo,  antibodies  first  appear  after  the  twenty- 
first  day.  In  very  young  swine  embryos  only  very  small  amounts  of  comple- 
ment, hemolysin-amboceptor  and  opsonin  are  found ;  these  increase  during 
embryonal  development  (Sherman).  In  this  connection  we  may  also  cite  the 
observation  that  while  in  the  Freund-Kaminer  test  normal  adult  human  sera 
are  able  to  dissolve  cancer  cells,  the  sera  of  human  fetuses  do  not  yet  possess 
this  ability,  and  resemble  in  this  respect  the  sera  of  persons  afflicted  with 
cancer. 

It  is  well  known  that  different  species  of  animals  differ  very  much  in  their 
power  of  resistance  to  certain  bacteria  and  toxins.  Similarly,  the  reactivity  of 
young  organisms  to  various  toxins  and  bacteria  may  differ  from  that  shown 
by  adult  organisms.  Thus,  according  to  Camus  and  Gley,  the  erythrocytes  of 
newly-born  rabbits  are  more  resistant  to  eel  serum  than  those  of  older  in- 
dividuals. Newly-born  chicks  and  rabbits  are  not  sensitive  to  arachnolysins 
and  are  less  sensitive  to  cobra  toxin.  Heterohemolysins  may  be  found  in 
smaller  quantity  in  younger  than  in  older  individuals,  the  amount  of  ambocep- 
tor as  well  as  of  complement  being  less  in  younger  organisms.  These  observa- 
tions agree  with  the  findings  in  other  experiments  of  Sachs,  in  which  he 


526  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

showed  that  immune  hemolysins  produced  against  erythrocytes  of  adult 
chickens,  beef,  rabbits  and  guinea  pigs  are  without  injurious  effect  if  they 
are  injected  into  the  circulation  of  embryos  or  of  newly-born  animals  of  these 
species.  Similarly,  very  young  children  often  prove  negative  to  the  Schick 
and  Dick  tests,  their  blood  being  free  from  antitoxin.  On  the  contrary,  we 
may  find  in  young  organisms  a  lack  of  resistance  to  certain  bacteria  and 
viruses,  to  which  adult  organisms  may  be  definitely  resistant.  Thus  there  seems 
to  be  an  increase  in  the  resistance  to  poliomyelitis  with  advancing  age,  as 
manifested  by  the  fall  in  morbidity  and  the  rising  level  in  the  therapeutic 
efficiency  of  blood  serum.  In  the  serum  of  adult  Rhesus  monkeys  a  substance 
neutralizing  the  poliomyelitis  virus  may  be  observed,  while  it  is  lacking  in 
immature  monkeys.  Such  increased  resistance  has  been  attributed  by  some 
investigators  to  a  preceding  latent  or  very  mild  infection  with  this  disease.  But 
Jungeblut  and  Engle  could  show  that  such  a  change  may  occur  even  in 
monkeys  which  have  been  kept  isolated  and  that  it  is  therefore  probably 
not  due  to  a  previous  infection. 

Likewise,  young  rats  are  much  more  susceptible  than  are  adult  rats  to 
inoculation  with  pneumococci.  The  blood  of  almost  all  humans  is  destructive 
for  pneumococci  of  type  II,  while  that  of  very  few  persons  possesses  the 
power  to  destroy  type  I.  The  blood  of  an  intermediate  number  of  individuals 
destroys  type  III.  In  the  blood  of  young  children,  one  to  fifteen  months  old, 
this  ability  of  a  mixture  of  serum  and  leucocytes  to  kill  pneumococci  is  rarely 
observed  (Robertson  and  Sia)  ;  with  advancing  age  its  frequency  increases, 
but  in  the  aged  it  is  again  rarely  present.  As  in  the  case  of  poliomyelitis,  some 
investigators  attribute  also  this  increase  in  resistance  with  advancing  age  to  a 
preceding  latent  or  mild  infection  with  the  specific  organism,  but  recently  the 
suggestion  has  been  made  that  an  infection  with  a  different  and  perhaps  non- 
virulent  organism  which  has  certain  antigens  in  common  with  the  pathogenic 
one,  may  be  responsible  for  such  an  effect.  But  this  interpretation  is  not 
sufficient  to  explain  all  observations,  although  it  may  apply  in  some  instances. 
Other  investigators,  Friedberger,  Hirszfeld,  Jungeblut  and  Engle,  assume 
therefore  that  a  gradual  physiological  ripening,  due  to  a  biochemical  change 
in  cells  or  tissues,  is  the  cause  of  this  altered  mode  of  reaction  in  older  age. 
On  the  whole,  this  explanation  appears  more  probable  and  it  seems  to  hold 
good,  for  instance,  in  the  case  of  the  blood-group  differentials  and  in  other 
instances  already  mentioned.  A  maturation  immunity  develops  in  mice,  with 
advancing  age,  to  the  virus  of  vesicular  stomatitis.  Mice  two  weeks  of  age, 
succumb  to  intramuscular  injection  of  this  virus  in  almost  100  per  cent.  With 
increasing  age,  the  resistance  gradually  increases.  Mice  older  than  six  weeks 
are  completely  resistant  to  intramuscular  injection,  but  not  to  intracerebral 
administration  of  this  virus  (Olitsky,  Sabin  and  Cox).  A  barrier  to  the 
further  progression  of  the  virus  seems  to  develop  at  the  myoneural  junction. 
In  favor  of  the  theory  of  a  maturation  resistance  of  tissues,  it  may  also  be 
stated  that  an  active  immunity  is  very  difficult  to  produce  against  certain 
cells  and  toxins  in  very  young  animals.  This  fact  has  been  demonstrated  by 
the  experiments  of  Famulener,  who  found  that  young  kids  did  not  respond 


REACTIONS  OF  NEWBORN  AND  ADULT  ORGANISMS    527 

to  any  extent  with  the  production  of  hemolysins  following  subcutaneous  in- 
jections of  sheep  red  blood  corpuscles.  In  more  recent  investigations  Jules 
Freund  as  well  as  Leona  Baumgartner  noted  that  production  of  agglutinin, 
hemolysin  and  precipitin,  interacting  with  bacteria,  erythrocytes  or  proteins, 
is  less  intense  in  very  young  rabbits,  and  according  to  Baumgartner,  the  avidity 
of  immune  sera  for  antigenic  bacteria  may  be  diminished.  Furthermore,  the 
skin  in  very  young  rabbits  is  less  sensitive  than  in  adult  ones,  and  in  young 
guinea  pigs  the  skin  likewise  reacts  less  actively  to  tuberculin.  However,  as 
stated,  at  present  we  cannot  entirely  exclude  the  possibility  that  in  some  cases 
a  previous  infection  with  a  homologous  or  heterologous  microorganism  may 
have  caused  an  increased  resistance  against  certain  viruses  or  bacteria. 

As  to  the  mode  in  which  a  physiological  maturation  of  cells  leads  to  an 
increased  resistance,  Hirszfeld  is  inclined  to  attribute  it  to  an  increase  in 
affinity  of  cells  for  certain  toxins,  taking  place  either  during  a  normal  bio- 
chemical maturation  process  or  as  the  result  of  the  previous  activity  ojf 
microorganisms  and  their  toxins.  Such  an  increase  in  affinity  of  cells  for  a 
certain  antigen  is  also  assumed  to  be  the  factor  causing  anaphylactic  reactions. 
Thus  during  the  process  of  immunization  there  may  exist,  side  by  side  with 
the  production  of  antibodies,  an  increased  sensitiveness  to  the  action  of  toxins. 
If  children,  negative  to  the  Schick  or  Dick  tests,  who  are  allergic  to  the  toxins 
of  diphtheria  bacilli  or  of  streptococci,  are  actively  immunized  by  the  injection 
of  these  respective  microorganisms  or  their  toxins,  their  skin  may  for  some 
time  react  positively  to  the  local  injection  of  the  toxins  and  thus  a  change  may 
take  place,  which  is  apparently  due  to  an  increase  in  the  affinity  of  certain  cells 
for  the  products  of  these  bacteria. 

From  a  purely  chemical  point  of  view,  very  little  is  known  as  to  the  changes 
occurring  in  cells  with  increasing  age,  although  it  has  been  shown  that  there 
are  alterations  in  the  water  content  and  in  the  amount  of  calcium  and 
cholesterin  or  its  esters  held  by  certain  tissues  during  the  process  of  ageing. 
Furthermore,  Kossel  has  shown  that  during  maturation  of  the  sperm  cells 
their  constituent  proteins  undergo  definite  variations  as  far  as  the  quantitative 
distribution  of  the  amino-acids  and  diamino-bases  (histidin,  lysin,  arginin) 
is  concerned.  According  to  Schenk,  the  character  of  the  globin  in  the  hemo- 
globin changes  during  the  ageing  of  the  erythrocytes  or  in  persons  affected  by 
pernicious  anemia.  Thus  it  becomes  conceivable  that  the  mode  of  reaction  of 
certain  cells  to  homoiogenous  sera  or  to  toxins  may  differ  under  various 
conditions,  and  especially  at  different  ages  and  during  the  process  of  im- 
munization; but  the  chemical  character  of  the  factors  underlying  the  change 
in  the  mode  of  reaction  is  not  definitely  known. 

It  may  then  be  concluded  that  the  differences  in  reaction  towards  homoiog- 
enous or  heterogenous  tissues  which  organisms  show  at  different  stages  of 
development  and  at  different  ages  are  not  an  isolated  phenomenon,  but  are 
the  expression  of  changes  in  reactivity  to  various  types  of  foreign  substances, 
especially  to  those  of  a  toxic  character.  In  general,  both  the  reactivity  of  cells 
against  foreign  substances  and  the  ability  of  tissues  to  produce  immune  sub- 
stances against  them  is  lacking  or  diminished  in  young  organisms.  Presumably 


528  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  production  of  immune  substances  presupposes  the  power  of  the  tissues 
to  respond  with  primary  reactions  against  the  foreign  material.  The  chemical 
differentiation  is  not  yet  completed  in  fetal  or  newly-born  organisms,  as  is 
evidenced  by  their  diminished  power  to  act  as  antigens.  Perhaps  this  lack 
of  available  antigen  in  certain  cells  may  be  responsible  for  a  diminution  in 
their  binding  power  for  toxic  substances  and  in  their  ability  to  react  against 
the  latter.  Moreover,  it  seems  that,  as  we  have  seen  in  the  case  of  the  blood- 
group  agglutinogens,  differentials  may  develop  in  certain  cells  before  the 
mechanisms  have  developed  which  lead  to  the  production  in  the  serum  of 
specific  substances  interacting  with  those  differentials.  Such  observations 
permit  the  conclusion  that  in  the  embryo  and  fetus  some  substances,  which 
are  present  in  the  adult  organism  and  which  may  function  as  antigen,  are 
lacking,  and  likewise,  that  the  earlier  ontogenetic  states  have  not  yet  acquired 
the  full  power  to  react  against  and  to  neutralize  strange  and  toxic  substances. 
In  agreement  with  this  interpretation  are  certain  experiments  of  Theobald 
Smith  and  R.  B.  Little,  who  noted  that  newborn  calves  are  prone  to  acquire  a 
generalized  infection  with  colon  bacilli;  this  can  be  prevented  if  the  calves 
are  fed  colostrum  or  receive  the  serum  of  a  lactating  cow.  The  deficiency  in 
globulin  in  the  blood  of  newborn  calves  prevents  the  production  of  agglutinins 
in  these  animals  (Orcutt  and  Howe).  P.  Cannon  suggests  that  the  availa- 
bility of  globulin  for  the  production  of  immune  substances  is  the  essential 
factor  on  which  depends  the  ability  of  an  animal  to  respond  with  immune 
processes  to  injurious  interferences.  Globulin  is  relatively  deficient  in  very 
young,  and  again  in  old  individuals  and  also  under  unfavorable  conditions  of 
nutrition.  While  this  factor  may  play  an  important  role  in  determining  the 
degree  of  resistance  of  an  animal  to  an  injurious  condition,  it  is  probably  not 
the  only  one  which  is  active. 

But  there  exists,  on  the  other  hand,  also  some  evidence  which  indicates  that 
the  embryo  and  fetus,  and  even  the  organism  at  the  time  of  birth,  may  pos- 
sess substances  which  are  able  to  act  as  antigens  and  which  are  not  possessed 
by  the  adult  organism.  Thus  Lockemann  and  Thies,  and  Graefenberg  and 
Thies,  found  that  it  is  possible  to  sensitize  adult  rabbits  with  the  serum  of 
rabbit  fetuses,  and  that  a  second  injection  of  such  serum  causes  anaphylactic 
shock  in  the  sensitized  animals ;  even  the  mother  can  thus  be  sensitized  against 
the  blood  serum  of  its  own  fetuses.  It  appears,  furthermore,  that  during  the 
later  stages  of  pregnancy,  rabbits  as  well  as  guinea  pigs  become  naturally 
sensitized  against  a  substance  in  the  blood  of  their  fetuses,  the  pregnant  rabbit 
and  guinea  pig  being  sensitive  to  the  injection  of  the  blood  of  newborn  ani- 
mals belonging  to  the  same  species.  However,  in  addition  to  these  effects,  toxic 
substances  of  another  kind  may  apparently  be  active  in  pregnant  animals ;  it 
has  been  stated  that  the  latter  are  sensitive  also  to  the  injection  of  the  blood 
serum  of  pregnant  animals  belonging  to  the  same  or  different  species,  while 
normal  guinea  pigs  seem  to  be  more  sensitive  to  the  serum  of  puerperal  than 
to  that  of  pregnant  animals. 

We  do  not  need  to  conclude,  as  have  some  investigators,  that  the  earlier 
ontogenetic  stages  represent  different  and  phylogenetically  more  primitive 


REACTIONS  OF  NEWBORN  AND  ADULT  ORGANISMS    529 

stages,  but  merely  that  the  ontogenetic  structural  development  is  accompanied 
by  a  parallel  chemical  development  and  that  therefore  different  stages  of  the 
developing  organisms  possess  their  own  characteristic  substances,  which  under 
certain  conditions  may  function  as  antigens.  Furthermore,  the  organs  and 
tissues  of  embryos  of  phylogenetically  higher,  more  differentiated  organisms 
may  resemble  the  organs  and  tissues  of  embryonal,  and,  perhaps,  even  of 
adult,  phylogenetically  more  primitive  forms.  But,  the  embryonal  organs  and 
tissues  of  the  higher  organisms  differ  from  those  of  phylogenetically  less 
developed  species,  in  that  the  former  possess  specific  precursor  substances 
of  the  organismal  differentials  present  in  the  corresponding  adult  forms, 
which  are  lacking  in  the  phylogenetically  lower  embryonal  or  adult 
organisms. 


Chapter  6 

Organ  (Tissue)  Differentials  and  Their  Analysis 

by  Serological  Methods 

We  have  discussed  the  difference  existing  between  the  organismal 
differentials  and  the  mosaic  characters  which  compose  the  indi- 
vidual. It  is  the  latter  with  which  Mendelian  heredity  and  also 
embryology  have  so  far  been  almost  exclusively  concerned.  The  organismal 
differentials  are  common  to  all  parts  of  an  individual,  except  perhaps  certain 
paraplastic  structures ;  they  thus  differ  from  the  mosaic  characters  which 
distinguish  the  various  organs  and  tissues  in  the  same  individual,  and  which 
are  about  the  same  in  organs  and  tissues  of  the  same  type  in  two  different 
individuals  with  distinct  individuality  differentials.  As  we  have  seen,  it  is 
possible  to  analyze  the  organismal  differentials  not  only  by  means  of  trans- 
plantation but  also  by  means  of  serological  experiments,  one  of  these  two 
methods  being  preferable  in  certain  ranges  of  the  spectrum  of  relationship, 
the  other  in  other  ranges.  Similarly,  it  is  possible  to  analyze  by  serological 
methods  the  organ  differentials,  those  chemical  factors  which  are  the  same 
in  analogous  organs  in  different  individuals,  but  which  differ  in  the  different 
organs  within  the  same  individual.  Moreover,  it  has  been  found  that  there 
are  a  few  organs  or  tissues  in  which,  under  certain  conditions  of  experi- 
mentation, species  differentials  cannot  be  demonstrated  by  serological  meth- 
ods, but  in  which  organ  differentials  can  be  distinguished  by  these  means. 
The  first  example  of  this  kind  observed  and  the  one  best  known  is  the  lens 
of  the  eye.  Uhlenhuth  found  that  this  organ  can  function  as  antigen  and 
lead  to  the  production  of  anti-sera,  which,  however,  react  about  equally 
against  the  lens  substance  of  mammals,  birds,  reptiles  and  amphibia,  while 
they  do  not  affect  other  organs  of  the  species  whose  lens  was  used  for 
immunization. 

Organ  differentials  are,  therefore,  factors  inherent  in  organs  or  tissues; 
they  are  very  similar  in  the  corresponding  organs  and  tissues  of  different 
individuals  and  species  and  represent  the  structural  and  functional  char- 
acteristics of  these  organs  and  tissues,  while  the  organismal  differentials  are 
the  substances  which  distinguish  organisms  as  such  from  one  another,  and 
are  the  same  in  different  organs  and  tissues  of  the  same  individual.  The 
organ  differentials  represent  what  is  different  and  distinct  in  different  parts 
of  the  same  organism,  while  the  organismal  differentials  represent  what  is 
common  to  different  parts  of  the  same  organism  but  differs  in  analogous 
organs  and  tissues  of  different  individuals  and  species. 

Potentially,  both  organismal  and  organ  differentials  are  present  in  the 
fertilized  egg  in  the  form  of  precursor  substances.  These  differentials  are  in 

530 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  531 

some  way  connected  with  each  other,  differences  in  organismal  differentials, 
which  distinguish  individuals  or  species,  being  associated  in  a  graded  way  with 
differences  in  organ  differentials  and,  in  general,  with  differences  in  the  mosaic 
structure  of  the  organism  of  which  these  organ  differentials  form  a  part.  In 
the  embryo,  the  organismal  differentials,  as  well  as  the  organ  differentials,  are 
not  yet  fully  specialized ;  in  both  cases  only  the  more  fundamental  differentials, 
the  precursor  substances  of  the  finer  differentials,  exist.  Thus  the  organ  dif- 
ferentials at  a  certain  embryonal  stage  may  be  represented  by  the  differentials 
of   the  germ   layers.    Furthermore,   the   organizer    (inductor   or   evocator) 
substances  in  their  origin  are  intimately  connected  with  the  mosaic  characters 
of  the  individual ;  they  are  produced  in  differentiating  organs  or  tissues  and 
initiate  further  differentiation  in  other  organs  or  tissues.  The  organ  differ- 
entials  represent,   therefore,   the   specific   structures   and   functions   of   the 
tissues  and  organs  within  an  organism ;  they  are  intraorganismal  differentials. 
As  we  have  stated  previously,  in  this  strict  sense  the  organ  differentials 
represent  the  specific  factors  which  are  common  to  the  same  types  of  organs 
in  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species  and  in  species  belonging  to  the 
same  order  or  class;  but  in  making  these  distinctions  between  homologous 
organs  and  tissues,  it  must  be  understood  that  finer  differences  exist  between 
tissues  in  the  same  organism  than  is  usually  assumed.  When  we  differentiate 
between  certain  organs  and  tissues  in  an  organism  we  use  for  this  purpose, 
as  a  rule,  very  obvious  anatomical  and  histological  peculiarities.  Thus  we 
distinguish  between  organs,  such  as  liver  and  kidney,  and  between  tissues, 
such  as  epithelium  and  connective  tissue;  among  the  epithelial  tissues  we 
distinguish  still   further  between   stratified  and  glandular   epithelium,   and 
among  the  connective  tissues,   between  the  ordinary  collagenous   and   the 
cartilage  and  bone-forming  connective  tissues.   However,   further  analysis 
shows  that  these  are  rather  crude  distinctions,  that  in  reality  much  finer  ones 
exist  between  different  tissues,  which,  on  the  basis  of  morphological  criteria, 
we  are  accustumed  to  consider  as  possessing  essentially  the  same  character. 
As  we  have  mentioned  on  previous  occasions,  biochemically  the  connective 
tissue  of  the  uterine  mucosa  differs  from  that  of  the  Fallopian  tube  and 
vagina,  and  even  within  the  different  parts  of  the  cervix  there  are  graded 
differences  in  the  connective  tissue,  as  is  shown  by  the  response  of  these 
tissues  to  the  lutein  and  follicular  hormones.  Fibroblasts  differ  biochemically 
in  different  areas  of  the  embryo  as  to  the  amounts  of  acid  they  produce  and 
also  in  their  resistance  to  acid  and  in  their  proliferative  power.  Furthermore, 
Huggins  has  shown  that  the  regenerating  epithelium  of  the  bladder  has  the 
power  to  transform  the  fibroblasts  of  certain  organs,  but  not  those  of  others, 
into   osteoblasts,    which   are    then   able   to   produce   bone.    Apparently   the 
epithelium  of  the  bladder  gives  off  a  contact  substance,  which  acts  as  an 
organizer  and  transforms  only  connective  tissue  cells  of  some  organs  into 
osteoblasts.  As  these  examples  show,  the  differentiation  of  various  tissues 
is  a  much  finer  one  than  is  assumed  on  the  basis  of  ordinary  morphological 
criteria;   but   such   finer   differentiations   have   not   yet   been   subjected    to 
serological  tests  and  these  would  presumably  be  unsuccessful  on  account  of 


532  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  present  lack  of  satisfactory  serological  methods  for  the  detection  of  these 
organ  or  tissue  differentials. 

The  organ  differentials  develop  in  the  embryo  and  undergo  a  predetermined 
sequence  of  transformations.  As  a  rule,  the  organismal  differentials,  or  their 
precursors,  are  present  in  the  developing  organs  and  tissues ;  however,  certain 
endproducts  of  these  transformations  of  organ-forming  substances  may  lose 
a  part,  or  even  all,  of  their  organismal  specificity,  as  occurs  for  instance  in 
the  case  of  some  enzymes  and  many  hormones  and  related  substances.  Also, 
the  endproducts  of  tissue  differentiation,  such  as  keratin  and  lens  fibers,  may 
lose  entirely  or  in  part  the  finer  organismal  differentials,  while  the  organ 
differentials  retain  their  full  strength ;  this  applies  only  when  certain  serologi- 
cal tests  are  used  as  indicators  for  the  organismal  differentials.  Because  of 
the  relative  predominance  of  the  organ  differentials  and  the  diminution  in 
the  significance  of  the  organismal  differentials  in  certain  organs  or  tissues, 
it  is  possible  to  demonstrate  by  serological  tests,  organ  specificity  against 
tissues  and  substances  derived  from  the  same  species  when  it  is  difficult  to 
demonstrate  individuality  and  species  differentials.  Homoiogenous  lens, 
spermatozoa,  keratin,  thyreoglobulin,  fibrinogen,  and  even  insulin,  may 
function  thus  as  organ,  tissue  or  substance  antigens.  Likewise  casein  from 
goats'  milk  and  the  albumin  of  chicken  egg  may  serve  as  such  antigens  in 
goats  and  chickens,  respectively.  In  a  similar  way,  Schwentker  and  Rivers 
produced  antibodies  against  rabbit  brains  in  rabbits,  not  only  by  the  use  of  a 
combination  of  rabbit  brain  extract  and  pig  serum,  but  also  autolyzed  or  other- 
wise pathologically  altered  brain  as  such  could  serve  as  antigen.  Substances 
of  a  homoiogenous  nature  may  function  in  serological  tests  as  antigens  if 
they  are  abnormal  or  if  they  do  not  occur  in  the  circulation  under  ordinary 
circumstances. 

Both  organismal  and  organ  differentials  develop  thus  by  a  chemical  epi- 
genesis  in  the  course  of  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development.  However, 
while  the  organ  differentials  or  their  precursors  not  only  undergo  very  far- 
going,  specific  changes  during  embryonal  development,  but  are  also  readily 
accessible  to  experimental  modifications,  the  organismal  differentials  or  their 
precursors  seem  to  be  fixed;  so  far  it  has  not  been  possible  by  experimental 
means  to  transform  one  organismal  differential  into  another,  at  least  in 
higher  organisms,  while  it  has  been  possible  to  change,  experimentally,  the 
mode  of  development  and  the  transformations  of  organs  and  tissues. 

We  are  here  concerned  only  with  the  serological  methods  employed  for 
the  analysis  of  organ  differentials.  As  to  the  criteria  that  can  be  used  for 
this  purpose,  we  assume  the  presence  of  organ  differentials,  in  contrast  to 
organismal  differentials,  under  the   following  conditions: 

(1)  If  an  immune  serum,  e.g.,  one  against  fowl  egg,  differs  in  its  reaction 
qualitatively  or  quantitatively  from  one  against  blood  serum  of  fowl,  or 
against  other  organs,  tissues  or  substances  derived  from  the  same  individual 
or  species,  we  conclude  that  an  organ  differential  was  involved  in  the 
antigenic  action  which  gave  rise  to  the  formation  of  the  immune  serum.  The 


ORGAN   (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  533 

precipitation  method,  especially  in  combination  with  specific  absorption,  has 
been  used  most  commonly  in  the  analysis  of  such  antigens. 

(2)  If  the  immune  serum  directed  against  a  certain  organ,  or  against  a 
characteristic  substance  derived  from  this  organ,  reacts  with  the  analogous 
organ  or  substance  not  only  from  the  species  which  served  as  the  donor  of 
the  antigen,  but  also  from  other  species  more  nearly  related  to  or  even 
farther  distant  from  the  donor  species,  then  we  assume  that  these  immune  sera 
and  the  corresponding  antigens  are  organ-specific.  Thus,  as  stated,  the  immune 
serum  directed  against  the  lens  of  mammals  may  react  about  equally  well 
with  lens  material  from  birds,  reptiles  and  amphibia,  and  even,  although  not 
quite  so  well,  with  lens  substance  of  fishes ;  in  this  case  we  have  therefore 
predominantly  to  deal  with  organ  differentials. 

(3)  If  the  immune  serum,  directed  against  a  certain  organ,  should  react 
also  with  blood  serum  or  some  of  its  constituents,  or  with  other  organs  of 
the  donor  species,  the  latter  reaction  must  at  least  be  weaker  than  the  one 
which  takes  place  with  the  organ  which  served  as  antigen  for  the  immune 
serum.  In  some  cases  the  reactions  are  graded  in  accordance  with  the 
graded  relationships  obtaining  between  the  antigen-furnishing  organ  or 
tissue  and  the  other  organs  or  tissues 'of  the  donor  species.  Thus  immune 
serum  against  guinea  pig  erythrocytes  may  react  not  only  with  erythrocytes, 
but  also  with  leucocytes  and  spleen  tissue  of  the  guinea  pig,  but  not  with 
other  organs  of  the  guinea  pig,  nor  with  the  corresponding  rat  cells;  and 
the  immune  serum  against  brain  may  react  also  with  testis,  but  not  with 
other  organs.  If  an  immune  serum  reacts  not  only  with  constituents  of  an 
organ  which  served  as  antigen  but  also  with  a  certain  constituent  of  the 
blood,  it  does  not  necessarily  mean,  therefore,  that  an  organismal  differential 
served  as  antigen — although  it  may  have  this  meaning — but  it  may  mean  in 
some  instances  that  the  splitting  of  very  complex  material,  characteristic  of 
an  organ,  into  somewhat  more  elementary  substances  may  lead  to  a  relative 
organ-specificity,  which  allows  for  the  presence  of  similar  substances  in 
certain  other  organs  or  tissues,  or  in  the  blood  of  the  same  species.  The 
chemical  constituent  common  to  two  or  more  organs  and,  perhaps,  to  blood, 
which  is  responsible  for  the  joint  reaction  of  these  organs  or  of  the  blood  with 
the  immune  serum  primarily  directed  against  one  particular  organ,  would  not, 
in  this  case,  be  a  part  of  the  organismal  (species)  differential,  but  of  the 
differential  of  the  organ  used  for  immunization,  as  well  as  of  the  differentials 
of  certain  other  organs  or  tissues. 

It  is  possible  in  some  cases  to  increase  the  specificity  of  the  immune  serum 
against  an  organ  differential  and  to  diminish  or  destroy  entirely  its  reaction 
with  organismal  differentials  by  boiling  the  antigen  before  injecting  it.  In 
this  way  the  organismal  differentials,  which  concomitantly  with  the  organ 
differentials  might  serve  as  antigens,  are  injured  in  their  antigenic  power  to 
a  much  higher  degree  than  are  the  organ  differentials.  Furthermore,  if  the 
test  reaction  is  carried  out  with  an  alcohol  extract  of  the  organ  which  served 
as  antigen,  instead  of  with  native  or  boiled  antigen,  the  organ-specificity  is 


534  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

intensified  in  certain  instances.  Serologically,  organ  differentials  have  been 
tested  in  vitro  mainly  by  means  of  the  precipitin  or  complement  fixation 
reactions ;  organ  differentials  have  also  been  tested  in  the  living  animal  by 
means  of  specific  cytotoxic  effects  following  injection  of  immune  serum 
against  a  certain  organ,  or  by  means  of  anaphylactic  reactions. 

In  the  large  majority  of  cases  where  an  organ  differential  has  been  shown 
to  exist,  the  simultaneous  presence  of  the  organismal  differential  in  the 
material  serving  as  antigen  could  likewise  be  established,  or  at  least  made 
probable.  A  combination  of  these  two  antigens  is  indicated  under  the 
following   conditions : 

a.  If  an  immune  serum  reacts  not  only  with  the  organ  or  the  substance 
used  as  antigen,  but  also  with  other  organs  or  fluids  of  the  same  species, 
although  to  a  lesser  degree,  this  might  be  due  to  the  presence  of  an  organismal 
differential  in  the  antigen;  but,  as  stated  above,  this  is  not  necessarily  the 
case. 

b.  The  conclusion  that  also  an  organismal  differential  is  involved  in  the 
reaction  is  strengthened  if  the  immune  serum  reacts  with  the  analogous 
organs  of  other  species  in  such  a  way  that  the  reaction  is  the  more  intense, 
the  nearer  the  species  providing  the  antigen  and  the  second  species  to  be 
tested  are  related  to  each  other. 

c.  If  the  immune  serum  reacts  only  with  the  organ  of  the  donor  species 
which  served  as  antigen,  but  not  with  other  organs  or  with  the  blood  of  the 
donor  species,  and  if  it  does  not  react  with  the  analogous  organs  of  other 
species,  then  such  an  immune  serum  may  or  may  not  be  directed  also  against 
the  organismal  differential.  We  may  possibly  have  to  deal  with  an  immune 
serum  specific  for  a  certain  substance  which  does  not  possess  an  organismal 
differential.  But  if  the  immune  serum,  while  reacting  most  intensely  with  the 
antigenic  organ  of  the  donor  species,  reacts  likewise,  although  more  weakly, 
with  other  organs  of  the  same  species,  but  does  not  react  with  the  correspond- 
ing organs  of  other  species,  then  the  material  which  served  as  antigen  contains 
in  all  probability  both  organ  and  organismal  differentials.  The  lack  of  a 
reaction  with  any  other  species  in  such  a  case  may  represent  the  end-stage 
in  a  series  of  reactions,  in  which  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  decreases  more 
and  more  with  the  increasing  distance  in  relationship  between  the  antigen- 
providing  species  and  the  other  species  which  are  to  be  compared  with  the 
former. 

Various  organs,  and  substances  derived  from  these  organs,  differ  very 
much  as  to  the  degree  of  their  organ-  and  substance-specificity.  According 
to  Fleisher,  who  used  in  vitro  tests,  the  simultaneous  presence  of  species- 
specific  substances  and  of  substances  of  a  non-specific  character  in  various 
organs  complicates  the  demonstration  of  the  organ-  and  tissue-specific  sub- 
stances which  they  contain.  But  quite  apart  from  these  complications,  different 
organs  actually  seem  to  vary  considerably  in  the  readiness  with  which 
these  organ-specific  substances  can  be  demonstrated.  Thus,  Fleisher  states 
that  it  is  very  difficult  to  demonstrate  them  in  the  spleen,  but  that  this  can  be 
more  easily  done  in  liver  and  kidney.  We  have  referred  to  the  marked 


ORGAN   (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  535 

specificity  of  the  lens  of  the  eye ;  from  the  lens  substance,  partial  antigens,  two 
crystallins,  may  be  separated,  and  also  against  these  specific  precipitins  can 
be  produced,  which  are  the  same  irrespective  of  the  species  from  which  the 
antigens  are  derived  (Hektoen  and  Schulhof )  ;  this  is  an  observation  which 
is  in  accordance  with  what  has  been  found  in  the  case  of  the  precipitins 
against  the  lens  as  a  whole.  However,  these  two  crystallins  are  related  to  each 
other,  because  cross-immune  reactions  between  them  do  occur.  We  see,  then, 
that  in  this  instance  the  organ  specificity  can  be  reduced  to  the  specificity  of 
certain  substances  derived  from  these  organs.  But  in  a  preceding  chapter  we 
have  seen  that  according  to  Defalco  it  is  possible,  by  means  of  the  precipitin 
reaction,  to  demonstrate  in  the  lens  of  birds  the  presence  of  species 
differentials. 

The  brain  behaves  in  a  similar  manner  to  the  lens ;  it  also  shows  a  very 
pronounced  organ  specificity,  which  may  or  may  not  be  associated  with 
species  specificity.  However,  as  stated,  immune  serum  against  brain  reacts 
equally  well  with  testis  (J.  H.  Lewis).  Also,  vitellin  obtained  from  egg  yolk, 
as  well  as  casein  and  thyreoglobulin  (Hektoen)  are  organ-  or  rather 
substance-specific  material.  Anti-thyreoglobulin  sera  do  not  react  with 
globulins  from  other  organs. 

In  other  cases  a  more  graded  specificity  exists.  Thus  immune  serum 
against  egg  albumin  reacts  also  with  albumin  from  fowl  serum ;  yet  both 
these  albumins  can  be  distinguished  by  means  of  quantitative  tests.  Fibrinogen 
and  the  globulins  of  chicken  plasma  are  immunologically  nearly  related  to 
each  other;  but  they  can  be  distinguished  by  means  of  quantitative  tests  with 
immune  sera;  they  are  very  different  from  the  albumins  of  fowl's  egg  or 
fowl  serum.  Similar  relationships  are  found  between  serum  globulins  of 
mammalian  organisms  (Hektoen  and  Welker).  As  Dale  and  Hartley,  as 
well  as  Doerr  and  Berger,  have  shown,  the  serum  proteins  exhibit  two  kinds 
of  specificities:  (a)  The  species-specificity,  which  depends  upon  the  char- 
acter of  the  organismal  differentials ;  this  is  the  same  in  the  various  plasma 
proteins  from  the  same  blood,  (b)  The  fraction-specificity,  so-called  by 
Doerr,  which  corresponds  to  organ-specificity.  Each  mammalian  serum  protein 
can  be  distinguished  from  another  serum  protein  derived  from  the  same 
individual  or  species  by  means  of  the  anaphylactic  reaction.  Likewise,  Bence- 
Jones  protein,  which  occurs  in  the  urine  under  certain  pathological  conditions 
(multiple  myeloma),  is  serologically  quite  different  from  the  normal  serum 
or  plasma  proteins.  Immune  sera  against  hemoglobin  react  with  hemoglobin 
but  not  with  serum  proteins.  Furthermore,  the  antihemoglobin  sera  are  quite 
distinct  in  their  reactions  from  immune  sera  against  the  stroma  of  erythro- 
cytes ;  the  latter  contain  hemolysin  and  hemagglutinin,  in  contrast  to  the  anti- 
hemoglobin  sera,  which  do  not  contain  these  two  antibodies.  In  general,  the 
organ  proteins  are  distinct  from  the  proteins  of  the  bodyfluids,  although  the 
latter  may  be  derived  from  certain  organs.  On  the  other  hand,  we  have  men- 
tioned the  close  relation  which  exists  between  albumin  from  egg  and  from 
serum. 

In  lens  and  brain,  lipoid  substances  seem  to  be  at  least  partly  responsible 


536  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

for  the  organ-specificity  displayed  by  these  organs.  According  to  Witebsky, 
organ-specific  lipoids  are  present  also  in  kidney  and  liver.  In  seeds  of  plants 
there  occur  alcohol  soluble  prolamins  which  are  identical  in  very  nearly 
related  species  and  somewhat  different  in  more  distant  groups  (Wells  and 
Osborne,  Gortner).  These  may  be  considered  organ-specific  substances.  We 
have  referred  to  these  investigations  in  a  preceding  chapter,  but  may  discuss 
here  certain  points  which  relate  to  the  problem  under  consideration.  Wells 
and  Osborne  found  that,  as  evidenced  by  the  anaphylactic  reaction,  hordenin 
from  barley  and  gliadin  from  wheat  are  similar  to  each  other;  likewise, 
gliadin  and  glutenin  from  wheat  behave  much  alike  immunologically.  How- 
ever, a  guinea  pig  sensitized  with  gliadin  reacts  somewhat  more  strongly  with 
gliadin  than  with  hordenin.  On  the  other  hand,  hordenin  and  glutenin  are 
quite  different,  as  far  as  their  immunological  reactions  are  concerned ;  it  may 
provisionally  be  concluded  that  glutenin  and  gliadin  are  distinct  substances 
and  that  the  common  reaction  shown  by  them  is  due  to  a  common  radicle 
which  they  possess.  But  hordenin  does  not  seem  to  have  this  common  group, 
which  may  correspond  to  an  organismal  differential,  though  it  possesses 
some  radicle  in  common  with  gliadin,  which  is  not  shared  by  glutenin.  This 
is  an  interpretation  of  the  facts  which  would  seem  more  probable  than  the 
assumption  that  we  have  to  deal,  in  gliadin,  hordenin  and  glutenin,  with 
mixtures  of  different  proteins. 

Also,  in  the  case  of  animals  evidence  has  been  found  that  the  analogous 
proteins  in  different  organs  may  contain  different  radicles  which  determine 
the  organ-specificity  and  are  associated  with  certain  other  characteristics  of 
the  protein  which  determine  the  organismal  differentials.  However,  as  to  the 
character  of  these  gradations  in  structure,  interpretations  may  differ;  it 
might,  for  instance,  be  assumed  that  the  character  of  the  radicle  is  approxi- 
mately the  same  in  nearly  related  species,  but  differs  more  strongly  in  more 
distant  species,  although  some  similarity  may  still  exist  in  the  structure  of 
this  radicle  even  in  remote  species.  It  is  also  conceivable  that  finer  chemical 
groups  are  the  same,  or  only  very  slightly  different,  in  all  nearly  related 
species,  but  that  the  common  basic  radicle  on  which  they  have  been  super- 
imposed is  the  same  in  nearly  related  species,  but  differs  in  more  remote 
classes  of  animals. 

The  investigations  we  have  mentioned  may  serve  as  examples  of  organ- 
specificity,  the  latter  being  due  to  substances  contained  in  these  organs  and 
tissues;  these  substances  are  evidently  the  bearers  of  the  organ  specificities. 
It  is  of  interest  that  these  organ-specific  substances  apparently  represent 
either  reserve  foodstuffs  or  secondary  cell  constituents  not  exhibiting  the 
most  characteristic  features  of  living  matter,  but  constituting  end-products 
of  cell  differentiation  and  specialization.  Other  substances  of  this  kind  are 
pathological  in  origin.  How  far  the  more  labile  constituents  of  living  cells, 
as  for  instance  certain  nucleo-proteins,  possess  organ-specificity  is  as  yet 
unknown. 

We  shall  now  take  up  somewhat  more  in  detail  the  question  as  to  what 
extent  organ  differentials  may  be  associated  with  organismal  differentials, 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  537 

either  in  the  extracts  or  suspensions  of  certain  organs  or  in  chemically 
defined  substances  obtained  from  and  characteristic  of  such  organs.  We 
shall  consider  only  certain  of  those  substances  concerning  which  there  are 
on  hand  data  sufficient  for  this  analysis. 

1.  It  is  known  that  a  comparison  of  the  blood  sera  of  various  groups  of 
animals,  when  tested  by  means  of  the  precipitin  reaction,  indicates  the  degree 
of  relationship  of  these  animals  within  a  somewhat  limited  range  of  specificity. 
We  have  furthermore  seen  that  different  serum  proteins  show  a  definite 
substance-specificity  when  tested  with  precipitin  containing  immune  sera; 
but  a  specific  reaction  takes  place  in  the  latter  case  only  if  the  antigen  and 
the  corresponding  substance  with  which  it  is  to  be  compared  belong  to  the 
same  or  to  nearly  related  species  (Hektoen  and  Welker).  Thus,  immune 
serum  directed  against  the  serum  globulin  prepared  from  human  serum 
reacts  only  with  the  globulin  prepared  from  human  or  from  monkey  blood. 
Immune  serum  against  fibrinogen  prepared  from  mammalian  blood  reacts 
strongly  with  mammalian  but  only  weakly  with  chicken  fibrinogen,  while  con- 
versely, anti-chicken  fibrinogen  serum  reacts  strongly  with  chicken  and  but 
little  with  mammalian  fibrinogen.  By  means  of  absorption  of  the  immune 
serum  by  the  principal  antigen,  all  the  antibodies  can  be  removed  from  the 
immune  serum,  but  absorption  with  the  corresponding  antigens  from  other 
species  removes  only  the  special  antibodies  which  are  adjusted  to  the  latter 
kinds  of  antigen,  while  the  principal  antibody,  namely  that  which  is  directed 
against  the  fibrinogen  of  the  species  which  was  used  for  immunization, 
remains  in  the  serum.  Much  finer  are  the  differences  between  the  albumins 
from  the  egg  of  different  species.  Here  the  investigations  of  Dale  and  Hartley, 
who  used  the  anaphylactic  method,  at  first  seemed  to  indicate  an  identity 
between  the  crystallized  albumins  of  fowl  and  duck  eggs,  but  by  the  use  of 
more  refined  methods  Dale  succeeded  in  distinguishing  between  these  two 
substances  also  immunologically.  Such  a  result  suggests  that  in  other  cases 
as  well,  when  apparently  no  immunological  differences  exist  between  two 
corresponding  proteins  from  two  species,  such  differences  after  all  may  exist. 

These  observations  show  that  we  may  have  to  deal  in  these  instances  not 
only  with  organ  differentials,  but  also  with  organismal  differentials.  Like- 
wise with  casein,  it  seems  possible  that  a  combination  between  a  substance- 
(organ)  and  an  organismal-specificity  exists,  although  by  means  of  immune 
reactions  apparently  no  differences  between  the  antigenic  effects  of  different 
mammalian  caseins  can  be  established. 

2.  Hemoglobin  possesses  a  distinct  substance-specificity,  corresponding  to 
a  tissue-  or  organ-specificity ;  the  immune  serum  against  this  substance  con- 
tains specific  precipitins.  However,  an  immune  serum  against  hemoglobin 
of  a  given  species  reacts  not  only  with  the  hemoglobin  from  this  species, 
but  also  with  the  hemoglobin  from  nearly  related  species,  but  not  with 
that  derived  from  a  distant  species.  Thus  immune  serum  against  cattle 
hemoglobin  may  react  also  with  a  solution  of  sheep  hemoglobin,  but  not 
with  a  solution  of  hemoglobin  from  farther  distant  species;  exceptionally, 
this  immune  serum  reacts  with  human  hemoglobin,  but  only  if  it  is  used  in 


538  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

stronger  concentrations.  Likewise  sheep  and  goat  hemoglobins  react  with 
the  immune  sera  against  hemoglobin  from  either  of  these  two  species  and 
immune  serum  for  human  hemoglobin  reacts  also  with  monkey  (Macacus 
rhesus)  hemoglobin.  Immune  serum  directed  against  chicken  hemoglobin  may 
react  with  hemoglobin  from  turkey,  duck  and  pigeon,  although  not  with 
hemoglobin  from  goose.  If  immune  serum  against  cattle  hemoglobin  is 
exhausted  with  cattle  erythrocytes,  all  the  antibodies  against  any  kind  of 
hemoglobin  are  removed,  but  if  such  cattle  immune  serum  is  exhausted  with 
sheep  or  human  corpuscles,  only  the  antibodies  against  sheep  and  human 
hemoglobin,  respectively,  are  removed.  In  this  instance  we  have  to  deal  with 
a  phenomenon  similar  to  that  observed  in  the  case  of  fibrinogen. 

Heidelberger  and  Landsteiner  demonstrated  the  specificity  also  of  crystal- 
line hemoglobin  and  were  able  to  show  that  the  precipitate  which  forms, 
when  hemoglobin  and  its  immune  serum  are  mixed,  is  due  to  hemoglobin 
as  such  acting  as  an  antigen  and  not  to  an  adhering  impurity.  They  further- 
more found  the  specificity  of  hemoglobins  derived  from  different  species  to 
be  very  great ;  thus  horse  hemoglobin  immune  serum  reacts  much  more 
strongly  with  horse  hemoglobin  than  with  that  of  the  donkey.  In  addition, 
the  reaction  was  found  to  be  substance-specific,  the  immune  serum  against 
horse  hemoglobin  reacting  not  at  all  or  only  very  weakly  with  serum  albumin 
from  horse.  However,  according  to  Higashi,  immune  serum  against  chicken 
hemoglobin  gives  a  reaction  of  equal  or  nearly  equal  intensity  with  hemo- 
globin of  pigeon  or  sparrow;  this,  then,  would  indicate  a  restriction  of  the 
species-specificity  of  hemoglobin.  Hemoglobin  has,  therefore,  a  marked  organ- 
specificity  and  a  definite  although  somewhat  less  marked  organismal-specificity, 
comparable  to  that  of  serum  proteins. 

According  to  Ottensooser  and  Strauss,  globin,  which  can  be  split  off  from 
hemoglobin,  also  has  a  similar  organ-  and  species-specificity.  Immune  sera 
against  horse  globin  and  against  horse  serum  do  not  give  cross-reactions  if 
the  complement  fixation  is  used  as  a  test,  but  if  precipitation  is  the  test  method, 
immune  serum  against  globin  from  horse  reacts  also  with  horse  serum  as  a 
whole,  but  not  with  albumin  from  horse  serum,  while  immune  serum  against 
horse  serum  does  not  give  a  precipitate  with  globin.  By  preparing  amino- 
and  nitroglobin  further  structural  specificities  are  produced.  Anti-globin  sera 
reacted  with  anti-nitro-  and  anti-aminoglobin  sera,  but  the  reciprocal  reac- 
tions did  not  take  place ;  anti-amino-  and  anti-nitroglobin  sera  reacted  only 
with  their  respective  antigens,  but  not  with  globin. 

In  these  experiments  the  relationships  of  hemoglobins  of  various  species 
were  tested  by  means  of  immune  sera  and  a  substance-  (tissue)  specificity, 
as  well  as  an  organismal-specificity,  was  found ;  the  antigens,  within  a  certain 
range  of  accuracy,  behaved  in  accordance  with  the  relationships  of  the  various 
species.  Reichert  and  Brown  had  previously  observed  that  also  the  structure 
of  the  hemoglobin  crystals  corresponded  to  the  phylogenetic  relationships  of 
the  species  from  which  they  were  derived.  These  criteria  did  not,  however, 
suffice  for  the  differentiation  of  horse,  donkey  and  mule  hemoglobin.  How- 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  539 

ever,  the  characteristic  crystal  forms  of  the  hemoglobins,  which  were  studied 
by  Reichert  and  Brown,  correspond  to  primary  differentials  in  transplantation 
and  not  to  antigens  which  call  forth  immune  reactions,  with  which  we  are 
here  principally  concerned. 

There  are  other  characteristics  of  hemoglobin  which  may  serve  to  dif- 
ferentiate the  species  of  animals  and  even  individuals,  but  no  definite  cor- 
respondence has  been  shown  to  exist  between  these  characteristics  and  the 
relationships  of  the  species  or  individuals  tested.  In  this  regard,  according  to 
Anson,  Bancroft  and  Mirsky,  there  are  differences  in  the  maximum  spectro- 
graphic  intensity  of  the  bands  of  oxyhemoglobin  in  different  species,  but  the 
distribution  of  these  bands  does  not  correspond  to  the  relationships  of  the 
species.  Measurements  of  the  distances  between  the  maximum  intensities  of 
the  A  bands  of  oxygen  and  carboxyhemoglobin  showed  individual  as  well  as 
species  differences,  but  the  individual  differences  could  be  greater  than  those 
between  species.  In  these  respects  these  characteristics  behaved  therefore  to 
some  extent  like  the  blood-group  differentials,  which  are  quite  unlike  the 
individuality  differentials  in  their  distribution. 

3.  Thyreoglobulin  immune  serum  reacts  specifically  with  thyreoglobulin, 
but  not  with  globulins  from  pancreas  and  adrenal  glands,  and  the  immune 
sera  against  the  latter  substances  react  specifically  only  with  the  globulins 
from  their  respective  organs.  But  it  seems  that  in  the  case  of  thyreoglobulin 
the  organ-specificity  is  not  an  absolute  one  and  that  this  substance  may  react 
also  with  certain  other  proteins  from  the  same  species.  There  is  an  organismal 
differential  present  in  thyreoglobulin,  in  addition  to  its  organ-  or  substance- 
specificity.  The  immune  serum  against  thyreoglobulin  reacts  in  a  graded  way 
also  with  the  thyreoglobulin  from  other  species  and  in  this  case  the  range  of 
associated  secondary  reactions  is  wider  than  in  the  case  of  serum  proteins 
and  of  hemoglobins.  Thus  immune  serum  against  thyreoglobulin  of  one 
mammalian  species  reacts  in  the  greatest  dilution  with  thyreoglobulin  from 
the  same  species,  but  in  stronger  concentrations  it  reacts  also  with  many 
other  mammalian  thyreoglobulins ;  however,  the  relative  specificity,  as  mani- 
fested by  the  graded  character  of  the  reaction,  does  not  seem  to  be  present 
in  every  instance,  probably  owing  to  an  organ-  or  substance-specificity,  which 
the  thyreoglobulins  from  many  species  have  in  common  and  which  may 
sometimes  cover  up  the  organismal-specificity.  Still,  a  species-specificity  does 
exist,  as  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  immune  serum  against  chicken  thyreo- 
globulin reacts  with  chicken  thyreoglobulin,  but  not  with  mammalian  thyreo- 
globulin. As  with  hemoglobins  and  serum  proteins,  so  too  with  thyreoglobulin, 
absorption  of  the  immune  serum  by  the  thyreoglobulin  which  served  as 
antigen  removes  also  the  antibodies  against  the  associated  secondary  thyreo- 
globulins, while  absorption  with  an  associated  thyreoglobulin  removes  only 
this  secondary  thyreoglobulin,  but  leaves  the  antibody  against  the  principal 
thyreoglobulin  intact.  If  for  immunization  heated  thyreoglobulins  are  used 
as  antigens,  the  resulting  sera  contain  only  organ-specific  antibodies,  but  not 
antibodies    against    the    organismal    differentials     (Witebsky).     Similarly, 


540  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Witebsky  found  that  the  globulin  of  adrenal  glands  and  pancreas  lose  their 
organismal  differentials  as  the  result  of  the  heating  but  retain  their  organ 
differentials. 

4.  If  we  use  whole  cells  or  pieces  of  organs  for  immunization,  we  find 
again  a  combination  of  organ  and  organismal  differentials  present  in  the 
material  serving  as  antigens.  If  rat  leucocytes  are  injected  into  an  animal 
belonging  to  a  different  species,  the  immune  serum  reacts  most  strongly  with 
rat  leucocytes  and  more  weakly  with  kidney  and  liver  of  rat.  This  indicates 
a  relative  organ-specificity ;  but  in  addition  there  is  noticeable  also  a  reaction 
with  guinea  pig  and  rabbit  leucocytes,  which  is  weaker,  however,  than  the 
reaction  against  rat  leucocytes.  This  graded  character  in  the  reactions  indicates 
the  presence  of  organismal  differentials.  Forssman  differentials  are  also 
found  in  leucocytes  (Witebsky). 

5.  In  the  lens  there  seem  to  be  only  organ-specific  differentials,  yet  a 
closer  analysis  indicates  the  presence  also  of  organismal  differentials.  This 
was  shown  by  the  transplantation  experiments  of  Fleisher,  and  the  recent 
experiments  of  Blumenthal  indicate  even  the  presence  of  individuality  dif- 
ferentials. Serological  tests  also  suggest  the  presence  of  organismal  differ- 
entials, at  least  of  the  very  coarse  ones.  Thus  immune  serum  against  mam- 
malian lens  manifests  a  weaker  reaction  against  fish  lens,  or  the  reaction 
against  the  latter  may  even  be  lacking  altogether.  Conversely,  the  anti-fish 
lens  serum  reacts  more  strongly  with  fish  lens  than  with  mammalian  lens 
(Hektoen  and  Schulhof).  By  means  of  absorption  tests  it  can  be  shown 
that  each  type  of  lens,  fish  as  well  as  mammalian,  binds  its  own  immune 
serum  quota  in  a  specific  manner  and  leaves  the  other  fraction  behind  in  the 
serum. 

According  to  Krusius,  a  guinea  pig  sensitized  against  a  mammalian  lens 
reacts  only  very  weakly  against  fish  lens,  and  not  at  all  against  the  lens  of 
the  eye  of  cephalopods.  Likewise,  the  observation  of  Krusius,  that  if  animals 
are  sensitized  with  the  complete  lens  of  a  certain  species,  there  may  take 
place  a  slight  reaction  also  with  the  serum  from  this  species,  indicates  the 
presence  of  organismal  differentials.  As  Krusius  points  out,  this  reaction  is 
probably  due  to  the  effect  of  the  outer  layer  of  the  lens,  which  shows  as  yet  a 
less  fargoing  tissue  differentiation  than  the  inner  lens  fiber  material.  With 
increasing  tissue  differentiation  of  this,  as  well  as  of  other  organs,  the 
organismal  differentials  seem  to  become  less  marked  or  to  disappear  in  the 
end,  while  the  organ  differentials  become  more  pronounced,  at  least  as  far 
as  the  serological  tests  indicate.  It  is  the  transformation  of  the  capsular 
epithelium  into  lens  fibers  which  brings  about  this  change.  A  similar  change 
takes  place,  according  to  Krusius,  when  the  epidermis  undergoes  keratiniza- 
tion.  The  species-specificity  depends,  therefore,  apparently  upon  the  presence 
of  primary  tissue  proteins,  while  the  organ-specificity  depends  upon  a  modi- 
fication of  the  primary  tissue  proteins  comparable  to  the  introduction  of  a 
N02  group  into  the  protein  molecule  in  the  experiments  of  Obermayer  and 
Pick.  The  keratin  of  horse  hoof  and  of  human  hair  shows  accordingly,  in 
anaphylaxis    experiments,    an    organ-specificity    in    addition    to    a    species- 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  541 

specificity.  This  interpretation  agrees  with  the  findings  of  v.  Szily,  to  which 
we  shall  soon  refer. 

However,  that  organismal  differentials  are  still  present  in  the  lens  is  also 
indicated  by  the  fact  that  injection  of  homoiogenous  lens  material  in  the 
rabbit  does  not,  as  a  rule,  lead  to  the  production  of  antisera,  but  it  is  neces- 
sary for  this  purpose  to  use  heterogenous  lens  substance,  and  conversely,  in 
a  rabbit  sensitized  with  strange  lens  material  its  own  lens  cannot  call  forth 
an  anaphylactic  reaction.  This  observation  is  in  agreement  with  the  demon- 
stration of  individuality  differentials  in  lens  tissue  by  means  of  cellular 
reactions.  Still,  according  to  Guyer,  it  seems  that  a  guinea  pig  can  be 
sensitized  to  strange  lens  material  by  injuring  the  animal's  own  lens.  It  is 
possible  that  in  the  case  of  the  lens  a  very  pronounced  organ  specificity 
covers  up  the  more  finely  graded  organismal  differentials  and  allows  only 
the  very  coarse  ones  to  become  manifest.  In  agreement  with  this  interpre- 
tation would  be  the  experiments  of  Defalco,  who  obtained  species-specific 
precipitins  for  the  avian  lens. 

6.  Two  different  types  of  organ-specific  constituents  have  been  demon- 
strated in  the  brain  by  Witebsky  and  his  collaborators.  Witebsky  and 
Steinfeld  showed  that  there  are  (1)  alcohol  soluble,  coctostable  substances. 
The  antigen,  or  rather  hapten,  present  in  an  alcohol  extract  from  the  brain 
of  a  given  mammalian  species,  reacts  not  only  with  the  immune  serum 
produced  against  the  brain  extract  from  this  particular  species,  but  also  with 
those  of  all  other  mammalian  species.  It  is  therefore  to  a  very  high  degree 
organ-specific,  and  to  a  much  lower  degree,  or  not  at  all,  species-specific. 
Similar  organ-specific,  alcohol  soluble  differentials  can  be  shown  to  exist  in 
the  posterior  lobe  of  the  hypophysis  and  in  the  medulla  of  the  adrenal  gland. 
(2)  In  addition,  there  are  demonstrable  in  brain  suspensions,  heat-sensitive 
substances,  which  are  not  soluble  in  alcohol  and  which  react  only  with  the 
immune  serum  against  the  brain  of  the  species  from  which  this  organ  was 
derived;  hence,  beef  brain  suspensions  react  only  with  immune  serum 
against  non-heated  beef  brain  suspensions.  These  differentials,  which  are 
presumably  of  a  protein  nature,  are  therefore  not  only  organ-specific,  but 
also,  to  a  high  degree,  species-specific.  The  immune  serum  prepared  against 
non-heated  brain  suspensions  reacted  in  some  instances  also  with  alcohol 
soluble  antigens;  but  such  a  reaction  did  not  take  place  if  the  corresponding 
immune  serum  against  certain  other  organs,  such  as  the  epiphysis,  were  tested 
in  a  similar  manner. 

While  in  some  cases,  according  to  Witebsky  and  Lehmann-Facius,  boiled 
or  alcohol  soluble  organ  extracts  seem  to  be  better  suited  than  watery,  non- 
heated  extracts  for  the  demonstration  of  organ-specific  constituents,  this 
apparently  is  not  true  in  all  cases.  Thus  it  is  possible  to  distinguish  by  means 
of  complement  fixation  between  brain  and  epiphysis,  if  we  use  immune  sera 
prepared  against  the  unheated,  water  soluble  antigens;  but  immune  sera 
against  the  heat  stable,  alcohol  soluble  substances  in  epiphysis  and  brain  do 
not  make  possible  the  distinction  between  these  two  organs.  The  alcohol 
soluble  substances  in  brain  and  epiphysis  are  evidently  identical,  or  at  least 


542  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

so  similar  that  they  cannot  give  origin  to  organ-specific  immune  substances. 
On  the  other  hand,  certain  water  soluble,  heat  sensitive  substances,  pre- 
sumably of  protein  nature,  in  brain  and  epiphysis  represent  organ  differ- 
entials which  do  permit  the  distinction  between  these  two  organs.  However, 
while  these  two  kinds  of  immune  sera  react  most  strongly  with  the 
homologous  organ  extract,  a  weaker  reaction  takes  place  also  with  the  other 
organ  suspension.  This  is  probably  due  at  least  partly  to  the  presence  of 
common  organismal  (species)  differentials  in  brain  and  epiphysis,  as  is 
indicated  likewise  by  the  fact  that  the  immune  sera  against  unheated  beef 
brain  and  epiphysis  suspensions  react  also  with  beef  serum. 

7.  Fleisher  showed  that  in  liver  and  kidney  there  exist  species- specific  as 
well  as  organ-specific  substances ;  in  addition  to  strictly  organ-specific  sub- 
stances there  are  others  which  are  similar  to  or  identical  with  substances 
present  in  certain  other  organs.  He  used  the  complement  fixation  test,  but 
before  making  the  latter  he  determined  the  presence  of  specific  and  other  not 
strictly  specific  substances  in  the  immune  sera  by  means  of  absorption. 
Also,  according  to  Witebsky,  immunization  with  suspensions  of  kidney  and 
liver  leads  as  a  rule  to  the  production  of  both  species-  and  organ-specific 
antibodies,  but  the  former  predominate.  It  is  also  of  interest  that  precipitins 
and  hemolysins  do  not  develop  as  readily  after  injection  of  these  organ 
suspensions  as  after  injections  of  serum  proteins  and  erythrocytes;  they  are 
found  only  in  some  of  the  immune  sera  against  these  suspensions. 

In  recent  experiments  Henle  and  Chambers  showed  that  if  rabbits  are 
immunized  with  particles  0.1-0.3  micra  in  diameter,  obtained  through  centrif- 
ugation  of  various  organ  suspensions  of  the  mouse,  organ-specific  agglu- 
tinins can  be  obtained  from  brain,  liver,  kidney  and  testicle ;  negative  or 
doubtful  results  were  obtained  from  muscle,  lung,  pancreas  and  spleen.  Liver 
and  brain  particles  from  ferret  reacted  likewise  in  an  organ-specific  manner 
with  the  corresponding  anti-mouse  sera,  whereas  ferret  kidney  and  muscle 
particles  behaved  differently.  These  experiments  indicate  therefore  a  very 
marked  organ-specificity  of  several  organs  of  the  mouse,  which  may  have 
been  associated  with  a  species  specificity.  These  particles  consisted  of  nucleo- 
proteins  as  well  as  other  extractable  substances  (lipids).  Claude  had  formerly 
shown  that  similar  particles  behave  tinctorially  and  chemically  like  mito- 
chondria. It  is  therefore  possible  that  in  these  experiments  mitochondria 
were  the  substratum  which  yielded  the  organ-specific  reaction,  but  it  is  more 
probable  that  these  particles  corresponded  to  the  "particulates"  which  Bensley 
described  in  the  liver  of  guinea  pigs;  these  particulates  are  similar  in  their 
chemical  constitution  to  mitochondria,  but  they  are  smaller  in  size. 

8.  In  this  connection  we  may  also  refer  again  to  the  experiments  of  Mann 
and  Welker,  who  found  that  it  is  possible  to  produce  in  rabbits  precipitins 
for  the  proteins  of  human  and  rat  carcinoma.  The  immune  sera  against 
human  cancer  reacted  with  autolysates  of  human  cancer,  but  not  with  those 
of  rat  cancer,  and  the  immune  sera  against  rat  cancer  reacted  with  autolysates 
of  rat  cancer,  but  not  with  those  of  human  cancer.  There  was  some  indica- 
tion that  the  number  of  positive  results  was  greater  if  the  cancerous  tissue, 


ORGAN   (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  543 

which  was  tested  with  the  immune  serum,  was  derived  from  cancer  of  the 
same  organ  as  that  which  served  as  antigen  for  the  preparation  of  the 
immune  serum,  than  if  cancer  of  a  different  organ  was  used;  but  positive 
results  were  obtained  in  many  cases  also  with  autolysates  from  cancer 
originating  in  a  different  organ.  Likewise,  the  serum  of  cancerous  patients 
reacted  with  such  immune  sera,  and  in  this  case  also  there  was  an  indica- 
tion of  an  organ  specificity.  No  reactions  were  found,  as  a  rule,  with  the 
sera  of  non-cancerous  persons.  It  seems,  then,  that  in  carcinoma  a  protein 
antigen  is  present,  which  possesses  a  certain  degree  of  organ  specificity 
combined  with  species  specificity. 

9.  It  is  possible  to  produce  specific  immune  sera  also  against  spermatozoa, 
or,  rather,  against  spermatic  fluid,  as  well  as  against  testicle  and  epididymis. 
According  to  Ohki,  the  immune  sera  against  the  latter  organs  owe  their  origin 
to  spermatozoa,  or  to  precursors  of  spermatozoa,  which  are  found  in  the 
tubules  of  the  testicle  and  epididymis.  He  finds  that  the  anti-spermatozoa 
sera  produced  in  rabbits  react  most  strongly  with  spermatozoa  from  the  same 
species  which  served  as  donor,  but  that  a  weaker  reaction  may  take  place 
also  with  the  sperm-antigens  from  heterogenous  species.  Even  between 
spermatozoa  of  birds  and  mammals  and  their  immune  sera  an  interaction 
may  occur.  Both  precipitin  and  complement  fixation  reactions  were  used  in 
these  tests.  They  are,  on  the  whole,  specific  for  the  spermatozoa  present  in 
testicle  and  epididymis,  although  the  immune  sera  against  these  cells  may 
also  react  with  the  blood  serum  of  the  donor  species ;  but  the  latter  kind  of 
antibodies  can  be  removed  by  means  of  selective  absorption,  following  which 
the  antisperm  antibodies  alone  remain  in  the  immune  serum.  It  is  also 
possible  to  remove  by  means  of  specific  absorption,  through  previous  addition 
of  spermatic  fluid,  the  antisperm  fraction  of  the  immune  serum ;  but  while, 
in  this  case,  according  to  Hektoen  and  Schulhof,  the  antibodies  against  blood 
serum  are  also  removed,  according  to  Strube  the  precipitins  for  blood  serum 
remain  intact  in  the  immune  serum.  It  may  then  be  stated  that  distinct 
antibodies  may  be  produced  against  a  spermatic  fluid  and  against  a  serum 
fraction  present  in  the  antigen.  On  the  other  hand,  according  to  Ohki,  it  is 
possible  to  obtain  immune  sera  against  spermatozoa  which  do  not  react  with 
the  serum  of  the  donor.  If  we  accept  the  conclusion  that  it  is  really  the 
spermatozoa,  as  such,  against  which  the  immune  sera  are  produced,  we 
should  have  to  assume  that  the  spermatozoa  contain  both  organ  and 
organismal  differentials,  or  rather  their  precursor  substances.  They  would 
contain  organismal  differentials  or  their  precursors,  because  the  immune  sera 
react  most  strongly  with  spermatozoa  of  the  donor  species ;  they  are  organ- 
specific  because  an  immune  serum  against  mammalian  spermatozoa  reacts 
also  with  avian  spermatic  fluid.  While  also  in  this  instance  the  organ  dif- 
ferentials seem  to  be  more  prominent  than  the  organismal  differentials,  they 
are  less  so  than  the  differentials  of  the  lens  of  the  eye.  It  is,  furthermore,  of 
interest  that  according  to  Ohki  not  only  heterogenous  spermatozoa  may 
serve  as  antigens,  but  also  those  of  homoiogenous,  or  even  of  autogenous, 
origin. 


544  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Similar  are  the  conditions  in  fishes,  as  Kodama  has  shown.  Immune  sera 
against  fish  spermatozoa  are  organ-specific ;  they  react  with  spermatozoa  of 
their  own  as  well  as  of  related  species,  but  not  with  the  extract  of  fish  muscle. 
However,  they  are  directed  also  against  organismal  differentials  or  their 
precursors,  as  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  they  may  respond  in  a  quantitatively 
graded  manner  to  the  spermatozoa  of  different  species  of  fishes,  in  accordance 
with  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  latter. 

The  investigations  on  antisperm  immune  sera  present  an  interesting  prob- 
lem, inasmuch  as  in  this  case  we  may  have  to  deal  with  antigens  which  are 
constituents  not  of  somatic  cells  and  tissues,  but  of  germ  cells  from  which 
the  somatic  tissues  develop,  after  sperm  and  egg  have  united  during  the 
process  of  fertilization.  These  germ  cells  must,  then,  possess  substances, 
which  behave  like  species  differentials,  as  well  as  the  precursors  of  substances, 
which  distinguish  different  individuals.  They  must,  in  addition,  contain 
substances  which  are  specific  for  this  type  of  cells  and  which  correspond 
therefore  to  organ  differentials.  But  these  differentials  would  not  be  identical 
with  the  fully  developed  substances  present  in  the  adult  somatic  tissues;  in 
general,  the  specific  substances  present  in  the  germ  cells  would  represent, 
rather,  the  precursor  differentials,  from  which  the  substances  in  the  adult 
organism  develop.  This  follows  from  what  is  known  of  the  mechanism  of 
embryonal  development  and  from  investigations  on  the  lens  of  the  eye  and 
the  brain,  which  indicate  that  also  the  antigenic  function  of  the  organ 
differentials  arises  only  in  the  course  of  embryonal  life.  However,  the 
possibility  exists  that,  after  all,  the  immune  sera  against  spermatozoa  do  not 
develop  in  response  to  antigens  contained  in  the  spermatozoa  proper,  but  to 
a  constituent  of  the  spermatic  fluid ;  still  even  then  these  antigenic  constituents 
would  presumably  not  be  derived  entirely  from  ordinary  somatic  tissues,  but 
also  from  constituent  parts  of  the  spermatozoa  or  of  the  cells  from  which 
the  latter  develop.  This  is  suggested  by  the  fact  that  also  autogenous  sub- 
stances may  in  this  instance  have  antigenic  power. 

10.  It  is  possible  to  immunize  rabbits  against  the  yolk  of  the  chicken  egg. 
The  antiserum  thus  produced  forms  specific  precipitates  with  the  egg  yolk 
of  fowl,  but  not  with  their  blood  serum  or  with  chicken  embryo  extract.  We 
have  to  deal,  here,  with  organ-specific  substances.  The  reaction  is  strongest 
with  the  egg  yolk  from  fowl,  while  a  weaker  reaction  takes  place  with  the 
yolk  from  other  birds,  but  not  with  the  yolk  of  fish  or  reptile  eggs  (Seng). 
There  exists  in^  this  case,  therefore,  a  certain  quantitative  gradation  which 
corresponds  to  the  systematic  relationship  of  the  organisms  involved;  but  this 
correspondence  is  not  complete,  inasmuch  as  the  intensity  of  the  reactions 
among  different  species  of  birds  does  not  seem  parallel  to  their  relationship; 
and,  furthermore,  the  reactions  do  not  agree  with  the  serum  precipitin 
reactions.  There  is,  then,  present  in  the  yolks  of  eggs  a  system  of  substances 
which  differ  among  themselves  in  their  structure  in  a  manner  which  cor- 
responds, to  some  extent,  to  the  differences  in  systematic  relationship ;  yet 
these  relationship  differentials  in  the  egg  yolk  appear  to  be  independent  of 
the  organismal  differentials  of  the  serum  proteins.  This  is  perhaps  due  to 


ORGAN   (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  545 

the  fact  that  in  the  egg  yolk  reserve  substances  are  involved,  in  which  species 
differences  have  developed  apparently  independently  of  the  general  organismal 
differentials.  A  similar  reservation  should,  perhaps,  be  made  also  in  regard 
to  the  other  instances  cited  by  us,  in  which  organismal  differentials  seemed 
to  be  associated  with  the  organ  differentials.  The  possibility  cannot  be 
excluded  that  there  are  present  in  various  organs,  species-specific  substances 
which,  to  a  certain  extent,  are  graded  according  to  relationship,  but  which 
need  not  be  identical  with  the  ordinary  organismal  differentials.  Just  as  the 
structures  of  organs  show  certain  gradations  which  agree  with  relationships, 
so  there  may  perhaps  be  present  in  these  organs  substances  and  also  structures 
of  a  particular  kind  corresponding  to  this  specificity.  They  would  represent 
secondary  or  accessory  organismal  differentials;  while  the  organismal  dif- 
ferentials, which  can  be  recognized  by  transplantation  and  especially  by  the 
cellular  reactions  against  the  transplants,  would  be  the  basic,  primary 
organismal  differentials.  Inasmuch  as  it  is  not  possible  in  many  cases  to 
apply  transplantation  tests  for  the  differentiation  of  these  types  of  organismal 
differentials,  it  must  be  stated  again  that  the  term  "organismal  differentials" 
is  used  here,  and  also  in  some  other  chapters,  in  a  more  general  sense,  as 
representing  substances  which  are  gradegl  in  accordance  with  the  phylogenetic 
relationship  of  the  organisms  from  which  they  are  derived,  and  that  there 
are  among  these  organismal  differentials,  in  the  wider  sense,  the  primary 
organismal  differentials,  which  are  characterized  by  their  presence  in  all  the 
tissues  and  organs  of  an  organism ;  the  most  characteristic  constituent  of  the 
latter  type  of  organismal  differentials  is  the  individuality  differential,  which 
occurs  in  all  or  almost  all  of  the  tissues  and  organs  of  an  individual,  and 
which  differentiates  the  individual  from  all  the  other  individuals  of  the  same 
species. 

In  the  case  of  the  proteins  of  the  egg  white,  Hektoen  and  Cole  have  shown 
that  of  the  five  proteins  of  the  white  of  hen's  egg,  four  are  quite  distinct  from 
the  proteins  of  chicken  plasma  and  only  the  conalbumin  of  the  egg  seems  to 
be  identical  with  serum  albumin.  A  common  immune  reaction  between  egg 
white  and  blood  plasma  of  chicken  depends  therefore  upon  the  admixture  of 
a  protein  which  is  identical  in  both.  On  the  other  hand,  there  exists  a 
pronounced  species-specificity  of  the  egg-albumins  of  various  species,  and 
the  crystallized  egg-albumins  of  such  nearly  related  species  as  chicken  and 
duck  are  immunologically  not  identical  (Dakin  and  Dale).  Of  course,  in  the 
egg  yolk  and  egg  white  we  have  to  deal  not  with  substances  representing  the 
embryonal  precursors  of  the  organismal  differentials,  but  with  auxiliary 
substances  surrounding  the  embryo  or  serving  as  food  for  it.  It  might  there- 
fore be  expected  that  they  are  chemically  and  immunologically  distinct  from 
the  essential  constituents  of  the  developing  or  adult  organisms ;  they  repre- 
sent paraplastic  substances  which  are  formed  in  the  adult  animal. 

We  see  then,  that  as  a  rule  substances  or  cells  which  contain  organ 
differentials  also  contain  organismal  differentials,  but  that  the  proportion  in 
which  these  two  differentials  are  present  in  the  same  substance  or  cell  differs 
in  different  cases.  It  seems  furthermore  that  in  certain  instances  organ  and 


546  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

organismal  differentials  can  give  rise  to  distinct  antibodies,  which  may  be 
separated  by  means  of  specific  absorption.  This  relationship  between  organ 
and  organismal  differentials  is  further  confirmed  by  a  study  of  the  origin 
of  the  organ  differentials  during  embryonal  development.  Von  Szily  has 
shown  that  human  fetal  lens  does  not  yet  possess  the  marked  organ-specificity 
which  is  displayed  by  the  adult  lens,  and  that,  correspondingly,  the  anti- 
human  fetal  lens  serum  reacts  also  with  human  serum-albumin.  Hektoen 
and  Schulhof  confirmed  this  finding,  although  they  did  not  observe  it  as 
regularly  as  von  Szily.  In  addition,  the  immune  serum  against  fetal  lens 
shows  a  greater  affinity  for  lens  material  from  the  same  species  than  for  that 
from  a  more  distant  species;  both  of  these  reactions,  indicating  the  presence 
of  organismal  differentials  in  the  fetal  lens,  may  be  lost  in  the  course  of 
further  differentiation  of  the  lens  tissue.  We  may  then  conclude  that  in  the 
fetal  lens,  which  differs  also  structurally  from  the  adult  lens,  organismal 
differentials  are  more  and  organ  differentials  less  pronounced  than  in  the 
case  of  the  adult  lens,  and  that  as  the  result  of  complete  structural  differentia- 
tion the  significance  of  the  organismal  differentials  diminishes,  while  that  of 
the  organ  differentials  increases.  Similarly,  Witebsky  finds  that  the  organ- 
specific  lipid  constituent  of  the  brain  appears  only  when  a  certain  stage  of 
embryonal  development  has  been  reached,  and  that  it  is  not  yet  present  in 
the  brain  of  very  young  embroys. 

During  embryonal  development,  it  may  be  assumed,  we  have  at  first  to 
deal  with  substances  in  which  the  organismal  differentials  are  prominent, 
but  in  the  course  of  further  embryonal  development  changes  tending  toward 
greater  differentiation  of  the  parenchyma  and  toward  the  formation  of 
paraplastic  substances  take  place,  which  are  specific  for  a  particular  organ, 
and  concomitantly  with  the  increase  in  organ  specificity  the  organismal 
specificity  decreases  or  may  be  lost  almost  entirely,  at  least  as  far  as  serological 
tests  indicate.  The  substances  endowed  with  a  marked  organ  specificity  are 
formed  therefore  from  substances  which  possess  a  greater  organismal 
specificity.  With  the  increasing  complexity  of  an  organism,  not  only  the 
organismal  differentials  become  more  refined — as  is  indicated  by  the  trans- 
plantation method — but  also  the  organ  specificity  becomes  more  pronounced. 
An  analogous  process  takes  place  continuously  in  certain  tissues  during  adult 
life.  Certain  cells  in  which  the  organismal  differentials  are  in  all  probability 
as  yet  preponderating,  become  transformed  into  material  in  which  these 
differentials  decrease  in  importance  or  are  lost  altogether,  and  in  which 
correspondingly  the  organ  differentials  begin  to  predominate.  Such  a  process 
seems  to  occur  during  the  transformation  of  epidermal  cells  into  keratin, 
and  presumably  also  during  other  tissue  differentiations,  and  this  change  in 
the  differentials  is  apparently  a  characteristic  feature  of  tissue  differentiation 
in  general. 

Organ  differentials  occur  then,  ordinarily,  in  combination  with  organismal 
differentials.  In  order  to  immunize  against  an  organ  differential  of  a  non- 
protein nature  it  is  usually  necessary  to  employ  protein  substances  which 
possess  different  species  differentials  and  which  act  as  carriers  for  the  organ 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  547 

differential.  Thus  homoiogenous  lens  material  does  not  commonly  produce 
antibodies  against  lens,  but  Hektoen  and  Schulhof  found  that  it  may  do  so 
if  the  rabbit  which  is  to  be  immunized  by  means  of  homoiogenous  lens,  has 
on  a  previous  occasion  been  sensitized  against  heterogenous  lens.  Otherwise, 
if  homoiogenous  lens  does  elicit  formation  of  immune  substances,  these  are 
very  weak;  this  seems  to  be  true  also  of  spleen.  Similarly,  it  is  as  a  rule 
necessary  to  use  heterogenous  brain  in  order  to  produce  organ-specific  anti- 
bodies against  this  tissue ;  a  heterogenous  carrier  must  be  combined  with 
alcohol  extracts  of  lens  or  brain  to  produce  immunization.  On  the  other  hand, 
according  to  Kato,  rabbit  fibrinogen  may  elicit  in  rabbits  which  are  injected 
with  it,  the  formation  of  antibodies  against  this  antigen,  although  it  possesses 
the  same  organismal  differential. 

Likewise  in  the  case  of  organ  globulins,  including  thyreoglobulin,  homoiog- 
enous immunization  seems  to  succeed,  perhaps  because  these  globulins  do  not 
occur  normally  in  a  free  state  in  the  various  organs  but  are  bound  to  other 
substances,  and  if  they  are  freed  from  the  latter,  they  are  strange  to  the 
organism  which  is  not  adapted  to  their  effects.  In  the  case  of  spermatozoa,  it 
seems  that  even  autogenous  cells  may  serve  as  antigen,  and  the  same  has  been 
claimed  for  the  lens  of  the  eye  and  for  the  skin  by  some  authors,  but  this  has 
been  contradicted  by  the  findings  of  others.  It  is  conceivable  that  organ 
differentials  may  perhaps  act  as  autogenous  antigens  under  certain  conditions, 
although  the  organismal  differentials  cannot  act  as  such.  The  organism  and 
all  its  parts  are  adapted  to  the  autogenous  organismal  differential  because  it 
is  present  in  all,  or  almost  all,  the  organs  of  the  body,  whereas  each  organ 
differential  is  limited  to  a  certain  restricted  area  and  is  therefore  strange  to 
other  areas.  There  may  be  also  some  other  variations  in  the  reactions  of 
different  organ  differentials.  Thus  if  once  the  antiserum  has  been  produced, 
it  may  react  in  vitro  even  with  antigens  of  a  homoiogenous  nature,  at  least 
in  the  case  of  lens  and  brain ;  but  as  far  as  antiserum  against  fibrinogen  is 
concerned,  a  reaction  seems  to  take  place  more  intensely  with  heterogenous 
than  with  homoiogenous  substances. 

In  regard  to  the  chemical  character  of  the  organ  differentials,  it  appears 
that  different  types  of  substances  may  be  involved.  We  have  seen  that 
thyreoglobulin  as  well  as  globulins  from  other  organs  may  serve  as  organ- 
specific  antigens.  Similarly,  fibrinogen,  serum-globulin  and  hemoglobin  possess 
a  substance  (or  organ)  specificity  in  addition  to  species  specificity.  In  the 
lens  Hektoen  and  Schulhof  have  shown  that  the  two  crystallins,  which  are 
of  protein  character,  as  well  as  the  whole  lens  can  serve  as  organ-specific 
antigens.  In  brain  and  epiphysis  organ  differentials,  which  also  are  pre- 
sumably proteins,  have  been  demonstrated.  We  may  then  conclude  on  the 
basis  of  these  immunological  findings  that  organ  differentials  may  be  of  a 
protein  nature.  But  there  are  some  other  data  which  indicate  that  also  sub- 
stances of  a  different  kind  may  thus  function.  In  lens,  brain,  carcinomatous 
tissue,  and  also  in  leucocytes,  substances  which  seem  to  represent  organ 
differentials  can  be  obtained  by  means  of  alcohol  extraction.  Such  alcohol 
soluble  extracts  may  react  in  a  specific  manner  directly  with  the  antibodies, 


548  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

as,  for  instance,  those  directed  against  leucocytes,  brain  or  carcinoma;  on 
the  other  hand,  they  serve  as  organ-specific  antigens  in  combination  with 
heterogenous  sera  functioning  as  carriers,  as  has  been  shown  in  the  case  of 
lens  and  brain. 

As  far  as  the  immune  serum  against  leucocytes  is  concerned,  the  reaction 
with  the  organ-specific  component  of  these  cells  seems  to  be  intensified  if  the 
alcohol  soluble  fraction  is  used  as  antigen,  but  the  species-specific  constituent 
is  also  present  in  this  alcohol  soluble  fraction.  Still  more  pronounced  organ- 
specific  effects  can  be  obtained,  according  to  Witebsky,  if  boiled  suspensions  of 
leucocytes  serve  as  antigens.  In  such  immune  sera  the  organ-specific  com- 
ponent predominates  decidedly  over  the  organismal-specific  component,  which 
latter  may  be  lacking  altogether.  Likewise,  through  heating  of  thyreoglobulins 
the  species-specific  differential  can  be  destroyed,  while  the  substance-  and 
organ-specific  component  remains  preserved.  In  some  instances  the  alcohol 
soluble  organ  differentials  were  found  to  be  the  more  specific  ones. 

We  may  then  conclude  that  organ  or  substance  specificity  may  be  associated 
with  an  active  protein,  or  with  a  different  substance  which  in  combination 
with  a  protein  serves  as  antigen.  In  the  case  of  thyreoglobulin  or  other  organ 
globulins,  the  organ  specificity  is  presumably  due  to  a  sidechain  attached  to 
a  protein.  This  sidechain  may  act  similarly  to  the  radicles  introduced  into 
complex  proteins,  or,  in  general,  into  complex  colloidal  substances  in  the 
experiments  of  Obermayer  and  Pick,  and  of  Landsteiner  and  his  collabora- 
tors. Graded  reactions  between  different  organs  may  perhaps  depend  upon  a 
multiplicity  of  differential  substances,  some  of  which  may  be  common  to 
them  while  others  are  distinctive  for  certain  of  these  organs.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  organismal  differentials  are  native  proteins  and  they  are  therefore 
destroyed  by  heating,  in  contrast  with  the  organ  differentials,  which  are  not 
destroyed  by  this  procedure.  There  is  however,  some  evidence  that  in  some 
organismal  differentials  an  alcohol  soluble  component  may  be  present;  in  this 
case  we  may  have  to  deal  with  the  secondary  or  accessory  type  of  organismal 
differentials. 

Absorption  experiments  have  shown  that  after  immunization  with  appar- 
ently single  substances,  such  as  fibrinogen  and  thyreoglobulin,  antibodies 
develop  not  only  against  the  fibrinogen  and  thyreoglobulin  of  the  species 
which  served  as  antigen — these  represent  the  principal  antibodies — but  also 
against  the  corresponding  substances  of  related  species;  these  would  be 
associated  antibodies.  Now  it  is  possible,  as  especially  Hektoen  and  his  col- 
laborators have  shown,  to  remove  all  the  antibodies  against  certain  substances, 
the  principal  as  well  as  the  associated  ones,  by  absorption  with  the  antigen 
from  the  original  species,  while  only  the  associated,  but  not  the  principal, 
antibodies  are  removed  by  absorption  with  the  differential  substance  derived 
from  related  species.  Similar  observations  have  been  made  by  various  investi- 
gators also  in  the  case  of  other  antigens  and  antibodies.  Here  apparently 
are  involved  single  substances  calling  forth  the  production  of  antibodies,  and 
we  must  therefore  assume  that  in  the  molecules  of  these  substances  graded 
differences  exist  in  different  species,  which  correspond  to  the  relationship  of 


ORGAN  (TISSUE)  DIFFERENTIALS  549 

these  species.  They  may  call  forth  the  production  of  a  number  of  different 
immune  substances,  which  differ  from  one  another  by  the  possession  of 
different  species  differentials,  and  the  antibodies  corresponding  to  the  species 
differential  of  the  antigen  used  for  immunization  predominate  over  the  asso- 
ciated antibodies  in  their  combining  power  with  the  antigen. 

The  experiments  with  egg  yolk  suggest  that  certain  substances  which  serve 
as  reserve  material,  or  are  of  a  paraplastic  nature,  may  undergo  in  the  course 
of  evolution  chemical  changes  which  more  or  less  correspond  to  the  systematic 
relationship  of  the  species  in  which  these  substances  are  found,  but  that  these 
chemical  transformations  may  be  independent  of  and  may  follow  a  some- 
what different  course  from  those  which  concern  the  primary,  typical  organis- 
mal  differentials. 


Chapter  J 

Idiosyncrasy  and  Anaphylaxis  and  Their 
Relation  to  Organismal  Differentials 

The  term  "idiosyncrasy"  implies  a  peculiar  state  of  hypersensitiveness 
to  a  certain  substance,  which  may  characterize  an  individual  and 
distinguish  him  from  others.  In  an  analysis  of  individuality  a  discus- 
sion of  such  a  condition  should  therefore  be  of  interest.  While  usually  only  a 
small  minority  of  persons  are  affected  by  an  idiosyncrasy  towards  a  substance, 
after  all,  the  frequency  with  which  various  substances  are  responsible  for 
such  a  condition  differs  greatly.  There  exists,  for  instance,  a  potential 
idiosyncrasy  to  the  injection  of  foreign  serum,  especially  horse  serum,  causing 
serum  disease  among  a  considerable  number  of  individuals;  likewise,  the 
tendency  to  become  hypersensitive  to  extracts  of  ascaris  is  almost  universal 
among  those  infested  with  this  parasitic  worm.  On  the  other  hand,  a  hyper- 
sensitiveness to  chicken  egg  is  not  frequent,  while  to  less  complex  chemical 
substances,  such  as  antipyrin,  it  is  quite  rare. 

However,  idiosyncrasy  has  an  additional  meaning.  It  signifies  an  individual 
state,  which  is  not  explained  solely  by  the  specific  character  of  the  substance 
eliciting  it,  but  which,  to  a  large  extent,  is  due  to  the  characteristics  of  the 
individual  affected.  Certain  of  the  principal  mechanisms  involved  are  now 
understood,  at  least  in  their  general  outline,  but  others  are  as  yet  unexplained. 

As  a  rule,  hypersensitiveness  to  most  of  the  substances  with  which  we 
have  to  deal  in  indiosyncrasy  is  localized  in  definite  tissues,  without  otherwise 
affecting  seriously  vital  functions  of  the  organism  ;  but  in  certain  cases  central 
mechanisms,  on  the  integrity  of  which  all  other  functions  depend,  may  be 
involved  and  then  an  idiosyncrasy  may  cause  rapid  death.  Such  an  effect  may 
be  observed,  for  instance,  in  the  so-called  serum  disease,  where  in  some  indi- 
viduals even  a  first  injection  of  a  heterogenous  serum,  usually  horse  serum, 
may  call  forth  very  acute  general  reactions  not  unlike  those  of  anaphylactic 
shock.  The  organs  most  commonly  affected  in  idiosyncrasy  are  the  respiratory 
system,  especially  the  nasal  mucosa  in  hay  fever  and  the  bronchi  in  asthma, 
the  gastro-intestinal  tract  in  food  hypersensitiveness,  the  skin  in  many  condi- 
tions in  which  certain  substances  act  primarily  on  this  organ ;  and  the  skin 
may  show  reactions  also  in  cases  in  which  primarily  other  organ-systems  are 
involved. 

While  thus  one  idiosyncratic  individual  may  differ  from  another  one  as 
to  the  factor  which  causes  the  hypersensitiveness  and  elicits  the  abnormal 
reactions,  the  modes  of  reaction  and  the  organ-systems  which  are  hyper- 
sensitive are  remarkably  similar  in  different  individuals.  In  general,  it  seems 
that  the  tissue  on  which  a  given  injurious  substance  acts  primarily,  is  the  one 
which  becomes  primarily  hypersensitive  to  that  substance,  although  subse- 

550 


IDIOSYNCRASY  AND  ANAPHYLAXIS  551 

quently  the  hypersensitiveness  may  extend  to  other  tissues.  As  stated  above, 
under  some  circumstances  these  localized  reactions  may  appear  negligible  as 
compared  with  the  general  reactions  which  take  place ;  this  occurs,  for 
instance,  when  a  large  quantity  of  the  offending  substance,  such  as  a  foreign 
serum,  enters  into  the  circulation. 

The  condition  with  which  we  have  to  deal  in  idiosyncrasy  is  evidently  very 
similar  to  that  observed  in  experimental  anaphylaxis  produced  in  animals  by 
repeated  injections  of  substances  of  a  protein  character.  Opie  has  made  it 
very  probable  that  local  anaphylactic  reactions,  as  those  characteristic  of  the 
Arthus  phenomenon,  are  due  to  a  local  interaction  between  the  antigenic 
protein  and  the  precipitin  which  developed  in  response  to  the  antigenic  pro- 
tein. The  presence  and  significance  of  precipitins  in  this  reaction  has  recently 
been  confirmed  by  Cannon,  who  used  more  accurate  quantitative  methods  for 
the  determination  of  circulating  precipitin  and  thus  demonstrated  the 
parallelism  between  the  amount  of  precipitin  formed  and  the  strength  of  the 
allergic  reaction.  However,  at  present  the  possibility  cannot  as  yet  be  entirely 
excluded  that  also  other  types  of  antibodies  may  be  involved  in  anaphylactic 
phenomena.  Anaphylactic  shock  corresponds  to  the  general  reactions  noted 
in  some  cases  of  serum  disease ;  the  local  status  of  anaphylaxis,  either  in  the 
skin  as  seen  in  the  Arthus  phenomenon,  or  in  the  intestines  (Schultz),  uterus 
(Dale),  or  blood  vessels  (Friedberger),  corresponds  to  the  types  of  local 
hypersensitiveness  as  they  become  manifest  in  various  cases  of  idiosyncrasy. 
However,  the  anaphylactic  shock  of  the  guinea  pig,  which  is  the  animal  most 
commonly  used  in  the  study  of  this  condition,  depends  mainly  upon  a 
localized  hypersensitiveness  of  the  bronchial  musculature;  but  there  may  also 
be  associated  changes  in  the  nervous  and  circulatory  systems.  If  we  except 
some  minor  variations,  there  are  two  main  differences  which  have  led  to  a 
separation  of  the  state  of  idiosyncrasy  from  that  of  anaphylaxis :  ( 1 )  While 
in  anaphylaxis  the  abnormal  reaction  indicating  hypersensitiveness  can  be 
traced  to  a  previous  sensitization  by  the  same  substance  which  subsequently 
elicits  the  reaction,  in  idiosyncrasy  the  reaction  may  be  induced  by  a  substance 
with  which  the  body  has  apparently  not  previously  been  in  contact;  (2) 
while  in  anaphylaxis  we  have  to  deal  with  a  hypersensitiveness  to  protein 
substances,  in  the  case  of  idiosyncrasy  the  active  substance  may  be  of  a 
much  simpler  character.  But  in  some  instances  of  idiosyncrasy  the  chemical 
character  of  the  active  substance  is  unknown,  and  it  is  possible  that  we  may 
have  also,  in  idiosyncrasy,  sometimes  to  deal  with  protein  substances.  (3)  In 
general,  anaphylaxis  is  a  well  defined  condition  of  hypersensitiveness  which 
may  be  experimentally  produced  in  animals,  idiosyncrasy  is  a  condition  of 
hypersensitiveness  which  apparently  occurs  spontaneously  in  man.  In  regard 
to  the  first  of  the  differences  between  these  two  states  mentioned,  there  is 
much  evidence  of  a  clinical  as  well  as  of  an  experimental  character,  which 
suggests  that  also  in  idiosyncrasy  in  man  a  previous  but  unsuspected  sensitiza- 
tion may  often  have  taken  place.  In  some  of  these  instances  the  sensitization 
may  even  have  occurred  during  intrauterine  life  by  way  of  the  placenta,  in 
others  it  may  become  manifest  only  a  considerable  time  after  contact  of  the 


552  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individual  with  a  certain  substance  had  taken  place;  in  still  other  cases  it 
appears  to  develop  only  gradually  during  the  continued  action  of  an  agent 
which  has  been  introduced  into  the  bodyfluids.  However,  in  every  instance 
among  a  number  of  individuals  treated  apparently  in  the  same  manner,  only 
certain  ones  manifest  such  signs  of  hypersensitiveness ;  and  the  persons  thus 
affected  may  be  few  or  many  under  varying  conditions. 

It  has  been  shown  especially  by  Cooke  and  Van  der  Veer  that  the  tendency 
to  become  sensitized  against  a  given  agent  is  often  a  hereditary  characteristic, 
in  which  apparently  Mendelian  ratios  can  be  demonstrated.  The  stronger  the 
hereditary  tendency  is  in  children,  the  earlier  the  hypersensitiveness  to  foreign 
protein  appears.  Thus,  if  both  parents  transmit  to  the  child  the  tendency  to 
hypersensitiveness,  the  idiosyncrasy  tends  to  appear,  on  the  average,  earlier 
than  when  the  transmission  is  unilateral.  In  the  case  of  Primula  extract  and 
nickel  salts,  Bloch  has  shown  that  while  some  persons  can  be  more  readily 
sensitized  than  others,  all  persons  can,  in  the  end,  be  made  experimentally 
hypersensitive  to  these  substances.  But  to  other  substances,  such  as  iodoform, 
salvarsan  and  mercury,  it  is  much  more  difficult  to  obtain  a  hypersensitiveness. 
The  conclusion  may  then  be  drawn  that  there  may  exist  a  hereditary  pre- 
disposition which  determines  the  readiness  with  which  an  individual  can  be 
sensitized  against  a  certain  substance. 

There  enter,  thus,  two  separate  factors  in  this  set  of  phenomena:  (1)  A 
hereditary  tendency  to  become  more  or  less  readily  sensitized  by  contact  with 
a  certain  substance;  this  is  a  factor  which  seems  to  act  in  a  quantitatively 
graded  manner;  (2)  a  sensitization  which  takes  place  as  the  result  of  contact 
with  a  certain  substance.  The  greater  the  predisposition  is,  the  more  readily 
is  the  sensitization  accomplished.  We  have  here  evidently  to  deal  with  condi- 
tions similar  to  those  which  have  been  noted  in  a  number  of  other  pathological 
conditions  and  especially  also  in  cancer.  In  the  latter  condition  we  expressed 
the  relation  between  the  inducing  factors  and  the  disease  by  the  formula 
H  (Heredity)  X  S  (Stimulation)  =  C  (Cancer).  Similarly  in  idiosyncrasy, 
the  relation  apparently  exists:  H  (Hereditary  predisposition)  X  S  (Sen- 
sitization) =  I  (Idiosyncrasy).  In  malignant  tumors  we  find  all  degrees  of 
hereditary  predisposition  to  cancer,  and  in  some  cases  cancer  may  develop 
apparently  spontaneously  without  long  stimulation  of  tissues,  as,  especially, 
when  certin  embryonal  abnormalities  end  in  cancer  formation.  Perhaps  also 
in  cases  of  idiosyncrasy  in  which  the  quantity  of  predisposition  exceeds  a 
certain  limit,  the  quantity  of  external  factors  needed  for  the  establishment 
of  this  condition  becomes  so  slight  that  these  may  escape  recognition.  There- 
fore, in  some  instances  the  idiosyncrasy  may  become  manifest  apparently  on 
a  first  contact  with  a  given  substance.  It  is  possible  that  we  have  to  deal  here 
with  a  condition  similar  to  that  noticed  in  those  diseases  caused  by  micro- 
organisms or  viruses,  where,  in  some  individuals,  there  seem  to  occur  spon- 
taneously formed  antibodies  against  the  causative  factor.  In  this  latter  in- 
stance, also,  the  question  arose  as  to  whether  or  not  these  antibodies  owed 
their  origin  to  the  action  of  an  antigen,  which  might  perhaps  not  be  identical 
with  the  agent  causing  the  disease.  However,  there  is  some  evidence  which 


IDIOSYNCRASY  AND  ANAPHYLAXIS  553 

indicates  that  immune  bodies  may  develop  under  conditions  in  which  the 
action  of  definite  antigens  can  be  excluded. 

It  has  been  observed  that  an  individual  who  has  manifested  signs  of  hyper- 
sensitiveness  in  one  organ  or  tissue  is  apt  to  become  hypersensitive  also  in 
another  organ,  and  perhaps  to  another  agent.  As  already  stated,  it  is  largely 
the  place  where  a  substance  acts  on  the  body  which  determines  the  tissue 
that  will  become  hypersensitive  to  a  given  substance  in  an  individual,  and 
which  furthermore  determines  the  character  of  the  symptoms  which  will 
develop;  the  recipient  tissue  is  the  one  which,  as  a  rule,  tends  to  become 
hypersensitive.  There  is,  in  addition,  a  specific  tendency  in  some  individuals 
to  become  sensitive  to  certain  substances,  as  for  instance,  poison  ivy.  Further- 
more, we  cannot  exclude  the  possibility  that  in  certain  individuals  there  may 
be  a  greater  tendency  of  a  special  organ  or  tissue  to  be  affected,  while  other 
tissues  are  exempt,  and  lastly,  while,  as  stated,  the  set  of  symptoms  in  a 
particular  tissue  or  organ-system  is  usually  very  similar  in  different  individuals 
exhibiting  idiosyncrasy,  irrespective  of  the  agent  which  has  caused  the  hyper- 
sensitiveness,  nevertheless,  minor  differences  seem  to  exist;  for  example, 
some  agents  more  than  others  tend  to  lead  to  the  production  of  eczema  of  the 
skin. 

In  discussing  the  similarities  and  differences  which  exist  between  the  experi- 
mental state  of  anaphylaxis  in  animals  and  idiosyncrasy  in  man,  we  have 
referred  to  the  fact  that  simple  chemical  substances,  which  cannot  themselves 
elicit  experimental  immunity  or  anaphylaxis  in  animals  and  thus  cannot 
serve  as  antigens,  may  induce  idiosyncrasy,  or,  to  use  a  term  introduced  by 
Coca,  may  act  as  atopens,  against  which  an  idiosyncrasy  may  develop.  How- 
ever, this  difference  between  anaphylaxis  and  idiosyncrasy  has  lost  much  in 
significance  since  Landsteiner  has  shown  that  relatively  simple  chemical  sub- 
stances (haptens)  may  serve  as  antigens  if  they  are  combined  with  foreign 
sera  serving  as  carriers.  But  there  still  remains  a  definite  quantitative  differ- 
ence between  the  substances  which  serve  as  atopens  ("idiosyncratogens") 
and  the  substances  used  by  Landsteiner.  The  latter  were  organic  substances, 
which  were  rendered  more  complex  by  the  introduction  of  certain  groups, 
as,  for  instance,  the  azo  group,  or  they  were  organic  dyes  in  combination 
with  tyrosin  and  resorcin,  while  the  former  may  be  very  simple  inorganic 
substances.  However,  as  first  shown  by  Obermayer  and  Pick,  also  relatively 
simple  inorganic  groups  like  iodine  may  determine  a  new  specificity  if  intro- 
duced into  serum  protein.  There  exists  a  further  similarity  between  certain 
experimental  findings  of  Landsteiner  and  observations  which  have  been  made 
in  idiosyncrasy.  Landsteiner  has  shown  that  different  stereoisomers  may  give 
rise  to  specific  states  of  anaphylaxis  and  also  that  the  ortho,  para,  and  meta 
positions,  respectively,  of  certain  groups  in  the  molecule  may  determine 
specificities.  Correspondingly,  Nathan  and  Stern  observed  in  a  person  an 
idiosyncrasy  for  meta-dihydroxybenzene,  although  there  was  no  reaction  to 
ortho-  or  para-dihydroxybenzene. 

It  is  possible  to  accomplish  a  passive  transfer  of  the  state  of  anaphylaxis 
from  one  animal  to  another  by  injecting  blood  serum  of  the  anaphylactic 


554  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

animal  into  a  normal  one.  While  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  it  is  the 
"sessile"  antibodies,  those  localized  in  certain  cells  and  tissues,  which  are  re- 
sponsible for  the  anaphylactic  reaction  taking  place  in  contact  with  the  anti- 
gen, at  the  same  time  these  antibodies  may  also  be  circulating  in  the  blood  and 
can  then  be  transferred  to  another  individual ;  in  the  latter  these  specific 
antibodies  again  may  attach  themselves  to  certain  cells  and  tissues  and  render 
them  hypersensitive  to  the  action  of  the  specific  antigens.  Similarly,  in 
idiosyncrasy  it  is  possible  to  transfer  this  condition  passively  in  many,  al- 
though not  in  all  cases,  by  injecting  a  small  amount  of  blood  serum  of  an 
idiosyncratic  person  intracutaneously  into  a  normal  one.  If  on  the  following 
day  the  antigen  is  re-injected  into  the  same  place  of  the  skin,  a  marked 
reaction,  indicating  hypersensitiveness  of  the  treated  tissue,  appears.  This  is 
the  Prausnitz-Kiistner  reaction.  This  reaction  is  positive  especially  in  the 
transfer  to  other  persons  of  human  blood  serum  from  individuals  hyper- 
sensitive to  plant  pollen,  egg  white,  cow's  milk,  fish,  or  horse  dander.  On  the 
other  hand,  injection  of  the  serum  from  cases  of  drug  idiosyncrasy  does  not 
lead  to  passive  transfer  of  the  hypersensitive  state.  The  blood  serum  of  the 
hypersensitive  donor,  in  whom  the  Prausnitz-Kiistner  reaction  is  positive, 
contains  an  antibody,  reagin,  which  can  combine  with  the  tissue  of  a  normal 
person,  into  whom  it  has  been  introduced,  and  make  this  tissue  hypersensitive. 
Such  serum,  or  rather  the  antibody  which  it  contains,  may  also  bind  comple- 
ment when  mixed  with  the  specific  antigen  (allergen),  or  it  may  neutralize 
the  latter.  It  has  been  possible  to  accomplish  passive  transfer  of  such  anti- 
bodies also  in  the  guinea  pig.  For  this  purpose  it  is  necessary  to  inject  larger 
quantities  of  the  blood  serum ;  the  antibodies  again  become  sessile  in  certain 
instances  and  induce  hypersensitiveness.  However,  the  number  of  cases  of 
idiosyncrasy  in  which  this  last  named  procedure  has  succeeded  is  much 
smaller  than  that  in  which  a  transfer  from  man  to  man  could  be  accomplished 
by  the  Prausnitz-Kiistner  method.  It  seems  that  the  passive  transfer  of  idio- 
syncrasy succeeds  better  if  the  serum  containing  the  antibody  is  obtained 
from  animals  nearly  related  to  those  which  are  to  be  passively  sensitized. 
On  the  other  hand,  if  the  serum  which  serves  as  carrier  comes  from  a  more 
distant  species,  then  it  is  liable  to  elicit  the  production  of  neutralizing  im- 
mune substances  in  the  injected  animal. 

There  is  an  additional  method  which  allows  the  passive  transfer  of  hyper- 
sensitiveness, although  in  a  much  more  restricted  sense.  It  has  been  shown  by 
Naegeli,  de  Quervain  and  Stalden,  in  a  case  of  hypersusceptibility  of  the  skin 
to  antipyrin,  in  which  the  skin  was  sensitized  not  throughout  the  body  but 
only  in  certain  areas,  that  following  autotransplanatation  of  a  piece  of  the 
hypersensitive  skin  to  a  place  where  the  skin  was  normal,  the  transplant 
retained  its  hypersensitiveness  in  the  new  situation.  It  may  be  concluded, 
therefore,  that  the  hypersensitiveness  actually  resides  in  the  tissues,  and  in 
vitro  experiments  in  which  the  skin  was  exposed  to  the  influence  of  anti- 
pyrin, it  could  be  shown  that  it  was  the  epidermal  cells  in  which  the  specific 
changes  had  taken  place ;  these  responded  to  contact  with  this  substances 
with  solution  processes.  We  have,  therefore,  to  deal  in  instances  such  as  this, 


IDIOSYNCRASY  AND  ANAPHYLAXIS  555 

primarily  with  a  hypersusceptibility  of  epidermal  cells  rather  than  of  blood 
vessels.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  the  latter  which  are  essentially  affected  in 
cases  in  which  urticaria  develops  rapidly  following  the  application  of  a  sub- 
stance towards  which  a  person  shows  an  idiosyncrasy. 

A  number  of  years  ago  the  writer  investigated  this  question  as  to  whether 
a  piece  of  uterus,  which  has  been  sensitized  to  horse  serum  through  a  pre- 
vious injection  of  this  substance  into  a  guinea  pig,  would  elicit  a  more  rapid 
and  a  more  intense  lymphocytic  infiltration  than  a  non-sensitized  piece  of 
uterus  after  homoiotransplantation  into  a  non-sensitized  guinea  pig,  when 
the  latter  was  injected  with  horse  serum  following  transplantation  of  the 
piece  of  tissue.  The  result  was  negative ;  the  response  of  the  host  to  the  trans- 
planted piece  was  not  altered.  It  seems,  then,  that  the  chemical  change  under- 
lying hypersensitiveness  does  not  increase  the  reaction  characteristic  of 
homoiotransplanation.  Somewhat  similar  are  the  recent  observations  of 
Aronson,  who  found  that  if  a  guinea  pig  is  made  hypersensitive  to  horse 
serum,  the  spleen  and  bone  marrow  of  this  animal  have  not  thereby  become 
particularly  sensitive  to  the  effects  of  horse  serum  if  the  latter  is  added  in 
vitro,  although  the  injection  of  horse  serum  into  the  skin  of  the  intact 
animal  would  elicit  the  Arthus  phenomenon.  On  the  other  hand,  if  a  guinea 
pig  has  been  infected  with  tubercle  bacilli,  its  tissues  are  readily  injured 
through  addition  of  tuberculin,  either  in  vitro  (Rich  and  Lewis;  Aronson), 
or  after  homoiotransplantation  (Pagel). 

So  far,  we  have  referred  to  substances  strange  to  the  body  as  exciting 
factors  in  the  production  of  idiosyncrasy.  Is  it  possible  that  also  autogenous 
substances,  those  originating  in  the  same  individual,  may  cause  sensitization? 
Observations  indicating  such  an  occurrence  are  on  record.  Thus  Duke  found 
that  in  several  cases,  in  which,  following  pregnancy,  milk  was  retained  in 
the  breast  or  in  which  lactation  was  much  prolonged,  a  state  of  hypersensitive- 
ness to  the  autogenous  milk  developed.  Injection  of  the  patient's  milk  into 
the  skin  not  only  gave  rise  to  local  skin  reactions,  but  also  to  asthmatic 
attacks.  Furthermore,  the  hypersensitiveness  could  be  transferred  by  the 
Prausnitz-Kustner  method  to  other  normal  persons,  but  it  was  only  human 
milk,  and  not  cow's  milk,  which  elicited  these  reactions,  indicating  that  in 
all  probability  an  organismal  (species)  differential  was  involved  in  this 
condition.  Milk  does  not,  under  normal  conditions,  circulate  in  the  body- 
fluids  and  is,  therefore,  strange  to  the  central  organ-systems  of  the  body; 
hence  the  occurrence  of  an  autogenous  sensitization  is  understandable  under 
such  circumstances.  Furthermore,  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  here 
an  inherited  predisposition  to  such  a  sensitization  may  play  a  certain  role.  In 
this  connection  we  may  again  refer  to  the  experiments  of  Guyer,  who  believes 
that  in  the  rabbit  precipitating  antisera  can  be  formed  against  lens  substance 
through  injury  to  the  animal's  own  lens,  and  to  the  corresponding  experiments 
of  Henshaw,  who  found  that  it  is  possible  in  the  guinea  pig  to  produce  sensitiz- 
ing antibodies  of  an  autogenous  nature  by  the  application  of  ultra-violet 
radiation  to  the  skin. 

As  already  mentioned,  non-protein  substances  in  combination  with  serum 


556  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

proteins,  may  serve  as  antigens  and  call  forth  anaphylactic  states.  Landsteiner 
employed  for  this  purpose  heterogenous  serum  and  observed  that  the  same 
hapten  in  combination  with  a  heterogenous  serum,  different  from  that  which 
was  used  for  sensitization,  may  react  with  the  antibody ;  under  certain  condi- 
tions even  the  hapten,  as  such,  may  be  able  to  give  rise  to  this  reaction.  Accord- 
ing to  Klopstock  and  Selters,  it  is  possible  to  sensitize  guinea  pigs  against 
diazotized  atoxyl  by  intravenous  injection  of  a  combination  of  this  atoxyl 
preparation  and  guinea  pig  serum.  However,  in  order  to  accomplish  a  sensitiza- 
tion by  means  of  subcutaneous  application  of  the  antigen  it  is  sufficient  to 
inject  diazotized  atoxyl  alone,  without  the  combination  with  guinea  pig  serum. 
A  reaction  indicating  hypersensitiveness  is  elicited  in  the  sensitized  guinea 
pig  by  the  intravenous  injection  of  diazotized  atoxyl  and  guinea  pig  serum; 
but  again,  a  reaction  can  also  be  obtained  by  subcutaneous  injection  of  the 
atoxyl  preparation  alone,  without  the  combination  with  guinea  pig  serum.  In 
the  latter  case  the  reaction  consists  in  a  localized  necrosis,  a  condition  closely 
resembling  the  Arthus  phenomenon.  The  authors  assume  that  after  sub- 
cutaneous injection  of  the  atoxyl  preparation,  the  sensitized  animal's  own 
serum  combines  with  the  atoxyl  and  acts  as  carrier.  In  the  case  of  sensitiza- 
tion with  simple  chemical  substances,  such  as  certain  drugs  and  the  extract 
of  primula,  it  is  likewise  possible  that  a  combination  of  the  hapten  with  autog- 
enous serum  takes  place  during  the  process  of  sensitization,  and  also  pre- 
ceding the  idiosyncratic  reaction.  But  as  far  as  we  are  aware,  a  direct  proof 
that  autogenous  serum  may  serve  as  carrier  in  the  process  of  sensitization  to 
such  antigens  has  not  yet  been  given. 

Experiments  of  Landsteiner  and  Chase  showed  especially  clearly  the  es- 
sential similarity  between  the  conditions  of  hypersensitivity  and  anaphylaxis ; 
these  conditions  differ  in  regard  to  the  site  of  the  body  which  reacts  in  these 
states  and  in  the  greater  difficulty  with  which  the  reactions  of  idiosyncrasy 
become  manifest.  Both  are  antibody  reactions.  Thus,  intraperitoneal  injections 
of  stromata  of  guinea  pig  erythrocytes,  conjugated  with  picric  acrid  or  with 
dinitrofluorobenzene  preceded  by  injections  of  dead  tubercle  bacilli  called  forth 
both  states.  Subsequent  applications  of  picric  acid  and  blood  serum  mixtures 
induced  general  anaphylactic  reactions,  as  well  as  local  skin  responses.  Instead 
of  sensitizing  with  picric  acid-erythrocyte  stromata  it  was  possible  also  to 
cause  sensitization  by  injections  of  picric  acid-guinea  pig  serum;  however, 
picric  acid  and  horse  serum  combinations  produced  only  a  state  of  anaphylactic 
sensitization  but  not  one  of  skin  hypersensitivity ;  to  produce  the  latter,  it  was 
necessary  to  use  homoiogenous  serum.  These  experiments  make  it  very 
probable  that  antibodies  are  involved  in  both  anaphylaxis  and  skin  hypersensi- 
tiveness. In  such  processes  of  sensitization,  hereditary  factors  determining 
degrees  of  response  of  the  individuals  may  enter  (Chase)  ;  this  would  be  in 
accordance  with  the  findings  of  Lewis,  Lurie  and  Webster,  which  have  estab- 
lished hereditary  differences  between  the  susceptibility  to  various  bacterial 
and  virus  infections  of  different  strains  of  animals  within  the  same  species. 

Though  all  the  facts  known  so  far  point  to  the  conclusion  that  idiosyncrasy 
and  anaphylaxis  are  closely  related  or  identical  phenomena,  certain  minor 


IDIOSYNCRASY  AND  ANAPHYLAXIS  557 

differences  may  perhaps  exist  between  them.  Thus,  while  the  typical  immune 
bodies  are  supposed  to  be  serum  globulins  and  are  therefore  not  diffusible 
through  collodion  membranes,  it  has  been  maintained  that  the  antibodies, 
which  make  possible  the  Prausnitz-Kiistner  reaction  in  serum  disease  and 
other  kinds  of  idiosyncrasy,  are  dialysable. 

As  to  the  relationship  between  anaphylaxis,  immunization  and  organismal 
differentials,  states  of  immunization  as  well  as  of  anaphylaxis  may  be  elicited 
by  substances  carrying  organismal  differentials,  organ  differentials,  and, 
besides,  by  substances  which  have  no  relation  to  either.  These  various  sub- 
stances may  also  induce  a  reaction  in  the  sensitized  animal.  Phenomena  of 
immunity  can,  moreover,  be  elicited  against  individuality  differentials,  but  it 
is  not  yet  certain  that  anaphylaxis  to  organismal  differentials,  which  are  so 
nearly  related  to  those  of  the  host,  has  been  observed. 

As  far  as  idiosyncrasy  or  so-called  allergy  is  concerned,  in  many  instances 
this  condition  seems  to  be  directed  against  a  species  differential.  Thus,  in 
idiosyncrasy  against  hair  of  a  foreign  species  the  state  of  hypersensitiveness 
is  a  specific  one,  affecting  the  hair  of  a  certain  species,  although  overlapping 
reactions  do  occur  (W.  Storm  van  Leeuwen).  The  experiments  of  Longcope, 
O'Brien  and  Perlzweig,  and  those  of  Forster,  make  it  probable  that,  on  the 
whole,  the  reactions  against  horse  dander  are  specific  and  distinct  from  those 
against  horse  serum,  although  according  to  Forster  cross-reactions  take 
place  to  a  limited  extent.  There  may,  therefore,  be  a  common  species  differ- 
ential involved  also  in  these  reactions.  We  have  already  referred  to  the  observa- 
tions of  Duke,  in  which  hypersensitiveness  to  human  milk  was  not  associated 
with  hypersensitiveness  to  cow's  milk.  In  a  case  of  experimentally  produced 
hypersensitiveness  of  human  skin  to  various  kinds  of  serum  by  means  of 
intracutaneous  injection,  Frei,  Biberstein  and  Frohlich  found  a  similar  over- 
lapping of  the  reactions  to  that  observed  in  the  precipitin  reactions.  The 
relationship  of  the  species  used  determined  the  specificity  or  lack  of  specificity 
of  the  reactions.  However,  here  we  have  to  deal  with  anaphylaxis  rather  than 
with  idiosyncrasy  in  the  strict  meaning  of  this  term.  In  anaphylaxis,  precipitins 
may  be  the  antibodies  involved,  according  to  Opie. 

While,  therefore,  organismal  differentials  may  be  concerned  in  idiosyncrasy 
as  the  exciting  agents,  they  do  not,  on  the  whole,  play  a  very  prominent  part ; 
on  the  contrary,  it  seems  to  be  characteristic  of  idiosyncrasy  that  relatively 
simple  substances,  quite  distinct  from  the  complex  substances  possessing 
organismal  differentials,  are  the  principal  agents ;  it  is  assumed  especially  in 
the  case  of  drug  idiosyncrasies  that  the  person's  own  serum  plays  the  role  of 
a  carrier,  to  which  the  hapten  attaches  itself.  But  this  is  by  no  means  certain ; 
it  is  possible  that  these  substances  may  act  directly  on  the  cell  protoplasm  of 
the  sensitive  tissues  and  here  call  forth  specific  reactions. 

Also,  other  investigations  indicate  the  relative  independence  of  conditions 
of  hypersensitiveness  from  strange  organismal  differentials.  Thus  while  in 
general,  in  immunization  against  organ  differentials  it  was  advisable  to 
select  as  antigens  sera  of  a  heterogenous  nature,  which  acted  as  carriers  for 
the  specific  organ-specific  haptens,  in  order  to  produce  skin  hypersensitiveness 


558  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

homoiogenous  sera  seemed  to  be  preferable  as  carriers  ;  at  least  this  was  found 
to  be  the  case  in  some  experiments.  It  may  be  assumed  that  under  these 
conditions  the  conjugation  with  the  hapten  made  the  serum  so  strange  to  the 
receptor  tissue  as  to  prevent  a  chemical  interaction  between  the  receptive  cells 
and  the  antigen,  notwithstanding  the  identity  of  the  species  differentials  in 
both  donor  and  host.  We  have  perhaps,  to  deal  with  quantitative  gradations 
in  such  cases,  in  the  sense  that  if  a  substance  does  not  usually  enter  into 
combination  with  a  certain  type  of  cells,  it  has  a  better  chance  to  act  as  an 
efficient  antigen,  and  only  slight  alterations  in  the  chemical  constitution  of 
such  a  substance  are  required  for  its  antigenic  function,  whereas  substances 
similar  to  those  which  commonly  come  in  contact  with  the  cells  cannot 
readily  act  as  antigens.  Frequent  contacts  of  this  nature  may  be  assumed  to 
occur  between  constituents  of  homoiogenous  blood  plasma  and  cells  of  spleen 
or  bone  marrow,  in  contrast  to  skin  cells,  where  such  an  intimate  contact  does 
not  usually  take  place. 

We  have  referred  to  the  significance  of  an  inherited  predisposition  in 
idiosyncrasy.  While  a  genetic  basis  may  be  conceded,  the  predisposition  to 
idiosyncrasy  seems  not  to  be  of  a  limited  nature,  directed  against  a  specific 
agent,  but  rather  of  a  more  general  character.  According  to  Cooke  and  Van 
der  Veer,  it  is  determined  by  a  single  dominant  factor ;  but  until  quantitative 
gradations  in  the  degree  of  predisposition  have  been  taken  into  consideration, 
the  mode  of  inheritance  in  idiosyncrasy  must  be  left  undecided. 

The  anaphylactic  phenomena,  on  the  other  hand,  which  have  been  studied 
mainly  in  animals,  manifest  pronounced  species  differences  as  to  the  readiness 
with  which  anaphylactic  reactions  can  be  elicited  and  as  to  the  organs  and 
tissues  involved.  Thus  the  facility  with  which  the  Arthus  phenomenon  can 
be  produced  varies  very  much,  and,  likewise,  the  relative  importance  of  blood 
vessels  and  bronchi  in  anaphylactic  conditions  differs  greatly  in  different 
species.  In  the  rabbit,  the  local  reactions  of  anaphylaxis  are  very  marked  in 
the  skin,  while  the  stomach  responds  very  weakly,  and  the  intestines  not  at 
all;  in  the  dog  the  order  of  sensitiveness  is  just  the  reverse.  In  such  cases, 
again,  differentials  are  involved,  which  form  a  part  of  the  Mendelian  mosaic 
in  an  organism.  In  the  predisposition  to  idiosyncrasy,  we  have  presumably 
to  deal  with  a  character  which  forms  a  part  of  the  mosaic  constituting  an 
individual,  and,  as  we  have  seen,  this  is  to  be  distinguished  from  the  individu- 
ality differential  which  characterizes  an  individual  as  a  whole. 

The  idiosyncrasies,  as  far  as  they  are  known  to  us,  concern  human  beings 
and  represent  one  of  their  individual  characteristics.  They  are  therefore 
comparable  to  various  mosaic  characteristics  which  may  serve  to  distinguish 
individuals,  such  as  skin  patterns,  scents,  tissue  malformations  and  electric 
brain  potentials.  It  is  an  interesting  phenomenon  that  contact  with  relatively 
simple  constituents  of  our  environments  can  alter  the  reactions  of  tissues 
with  which  they  come  in  contact  in  such  a  specific  and  individualized  manner. 


Chapter  8 
Toxins  and  Organismal  Differentials 

The  organismal  differentials  are  recognized  by  means  of  certain 
definite  reactions  which  are  called  forth  when  a  strange  differential 
is  introduced  into  an  organism.  The  reaction  may  be  a  primary  one, 
or  it  may  be  a  secondary  immune  reaction.  These  effects  may  follow  trans- 
plantation of  pieces  of  tissues,  as  well  as  injections  of  bodyfluids  or  of  ex- 
tracts of  tissues  from  other  organisms,  and  they  cause  a  disequilibrium  of 
the  host  to  a  degree  which  varies  with  the  relative  strangeness  of  the 
organismal  differentials  of  donor  and  host;  the  intensity  of  the  reaction  of 
the  host  tissues  against  a  strange  graft  or  material  injected  is  to  a  large  extent 
a  measure  of  this  disequilibrium  and  of  the  degree  of  strangeness  between 
host  and  transplant,  although  some  accessory  factors  may  modify  the 
intensity  of  this  reaction  within  certain  limits.  We  have  found  throughout 
that  the  farther  distant  the  relationship  between  transplant  and  host,  the 
greater  the  incompatability  which  results  from  transplantation.  This  applies 
to  transplantation  in  higher,  more  differentiated  organisms  as  well  as  in 
embryos  of  amphibia;  but  as  a  rule,  it  is  only  the  transplant  which  suffers, 
the  host  being  in  such  a  favorable  position  that  no  serious  injury  is  inflicted 
upon  it  in  the  large  majority  of  cases.  However,  we  have  referred  to  some 
instances  in  which  the  transplant  exerted  a  toxic  effect  on  the  host,  as,  for 
instance,  in  the  transplantation  experiments  of  Diirken  and  Kusche,  and  in 
the  transplantation  of  amphibian  eggs  in  the  experiments  of  Weber  and  others. 
There  were  indications  that  in  some  of  these  transplantations  we  had  to  deal 
with  the  injurious  effects  of  special  substances  rather  than  with  the  specific 
action  of  distant  organismal  differentials. 

If  these  special  substances  orginate  in  an  organism  and  normally  come 
in  contact  with  its  various  tissues  acting  as  endorgans,  and  especially  if  they  are 
present  under  ordinary  circumstances  in  the  circulating  bodyfluids,  they  are 
as  a  rule  not  toxic  for  this  organism.  There  is  a  mutual  adaptation  between 
the  cells  and  organs  and  these  autogenous  substances.  But  under  abnormal 
conditions  such  constituents  of  the  body  may  be  carried  to  tissues  with  which 
normally  they  do  not  come  in  contact,  and  then  they  may  act  as  poisons ;  thus 
bile  in  contact  with  the  pancreas  or  other  tissues  of  the  peritoneal  cavity  may 
be  toxic,  or  if  complex  substances  constituting  the  body,  such  as  certain  pro- 
teins, are  split  in  an  abnormal  manner  and  these  split  products  come  in 
contact  with  organs  and  tissues  of  the  organism,  they  may  have  injurious 
effects.  Also,  if  hormones  which  are  not  toxins  in  the  ordinary  meaning  of 
this  term,  are  formed  in  excess,  as  may  occur  following  an  increase  in  the 
amount  of  tissue  producing  the  hormones  or  following  a  more  intensive  stimu- 
lation of  this  tissue,  or  if  the  hormones  are  deficient  in  quantity,  due  to  a  lack 
of  the  necessary  tissue  in  which  they  originate  or  to  a  lowering  of  its  metabo- 

559 


560  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

lism,  injurious  effects  may  become  noticeable  and  abnormal  changes  may  take 
place  within  the  economy  of  the  organism. 

But  if  these  special  substances  are  introduced  into  a  strange  individual  they 
may  here  call  forth  toxic  effects.  In  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  discussed 
already  the  agglutinating  and  hemolytic  properties  of  heterogenous  blood 
sera,  which  seem  to  be  conditioned  by  factors  other  than  organismal  differ- 
entials. We  have  also  discussed  states  of  hypersusceptibility  in  which  otherwise 
innocuous  substances  become  strongly  toxic. 

In  a  wider  sense  we  may  include  also  the  strange  organismal  differentials 
among  the  toxins.  But  in  a  restricted  sense  we  understand  by  toxins,  special 
substances  produced  by  certain  micro-organisms  or  by  more  complex  higher 
organisms,  which  are  injurious  for  various  species  apparently  without  regard 
to  relationship.  Such  toxins  are  substances  which  may  be  formed  in  special 
organs  and  they  may  therefore  be  regarded  as  belonging  to  the  class  of 
organ-  or  tissue-specific  substances,  without  however  representing  the  real 
organ  or  tissue  differentials;  they  represent  mosaic  characters  which  have 
developed  in  addition  to  the  typical  organ  differentials. 

In  the  case  of  injurious  substances  derived  from  bacteria,  we  have  to 
distinguish  from  real  toxins,  non-specific  so-called  ptomaines,  which  pre- 
sumably are  mainly  split  products  of  the  medium  on  which  the  bacteria  grow ; 
the  latter  furnish  essentially  the  proteolytic  or  lipid-splitting  enzymes.  The 
ptomaines  do  not  therefore  contain  the  organismal  differentials.  As  to  the 
exotoxins,  against  which  antitoxins  can  be  obtained,  these  are  substances  which 
are  specific  for  certain  types  of  bacteria ;  thus  the  tetanus  toxin  differs  in  its 
character  and  effects  from  the  diphtheria  toxin.  These  exotoxins  apparently 
do  not  possess  organismal  differentials;  a  gradation  in  the  character  of  the 
exotoxins  produced  by  various  bacteria,  corresponding  to  the  relationship  of 
these  microorganisms,  has  not  so  far  been  demonstrated.  The  so-called 
endotoxins  seem  to  represent  diverse  kinds  of  substances,  among  which  are 
nucleoproteins  which  may  be  distinctive  of  different  species,  as  for  instance, 
those  obtained  from  pneumococci  and  streptococci.  However,  nucleoproteins 
obtained  from  various  streptococci  are  less  specific  than  certain  other  anti- 
genic substances  present  in  these  microorganisms,  and  moreover,  some 
endotoxins  appear  to  be  non-proteins  and  are,  perhaps,  glyco-lipids. 

Among  animal  toxins  it  is  especially  the  poisons  found  in  amphibia  and 
in  reptiles  which  have  been  studied  more  intensively.  In  various  species  of 
urodeles,  as  well  as  of  anuran  amphibia,  poisons  are  produced  in  the  glands  of 
the  skin  and  also  in  the  parotid  gland.  The  distribution  of  these  substances  does 
not  show  a  complete  parallelism  to  the  relationship  of  the  various  species  and 
their  pharmacological  effects  differ.  Some  apparently  are  identical  in  their 
action  with  digitalis,  a  plant  glucoside.  Thus  in  the  European  toad,  Bufo 
vulgaris,  several  specific  substances  have  been  obtained  from  the  skin  and 
parotid  gland;  although  in  different  species  of  Bufo  such  substances  show 
some  differences,  essentially  they  are  of  a  related  nature,  acting  similarly  to 
digitalis.  Twitty  and  Johnson  recently  observed  in  embryos  of  Triturus 
torosus  a  substance  paralyzing  larvae  of  Amblystoma  tigrinum ;  this  substance 
is  apparently  different  from  the  toxic  substances  present  in  the  glands  of  the 


TOXINS  AND  ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  561 

skin  of  Triturus.  Embryos  of  related  species  of  Triturus  also  produce  this 
paralyzing  toxin,  but  either  in  smaller  quantities  than  Triturus  torosus  or  in 
a  weaker  form.  Furthermore,  other  types  of  Amblystoma  are  also  susceptible 
to  its  action,  though  not  to  the  same  extent  as  Amblystoma  tigrinum.  The 
Triturus  toxin  is  not  poisonous  for  various  species  of  Triturus.  In  some 
respects  there  is  noticeable  a  relation  between  the  amphibian  organismal 
differentials,  on  the  one  hand,  and  these  toxins  and  also  the  structure  and 
metabolism  of  the  poison-producing  glands  of  the  skin  and  parotid,  on  the 
other.  However,  in  other  respects  these  organ-specificities  do  not  parallel  the 
organismal  differentials.  Also,  Bytinski-Salz  has  described,  in  the  embryos 
of  certain  anuran  amphibia,  toxic  substances  somewhat  similar  to  those  which 
are  produced  in  the  adult  cutaneous  glands,  but  the  order  of  toxicity  in  the 
embryonal  material  and  in  the  adult  skin  in  different  species  is  not  the  same. 
The  adult  Bufo  produces  very  toxic  substances  in  the  skin,  while  it  is 
especially  the  embryos  of  Pelobates  which  contain  poisonous  material. 

If  we  omit  from  consideration  these  specific  poisons,  which  do  not  respect 
phylogenetic  relationship  as  far  as  their  orgin  and  their  action  on  different 
organisms  is  concerned,  there  still  remain  substances,  formed  in  the  embryo, 
having  toxic  effects,  which  on  the  whole  run  parallel  to  the  distance  in  relation- 
ship between  the  species  producing  the  toxins  and  the  species  serving  as  a 
test  object.  We  have,  therefore,  to  distinguish  between  two  kinds  of  toxic 
substances  in  these  amphibian  larvae :  (1)  Those  which  are  due  to  peculiarities 
of  certain  organs  and  which  apparently  act  more  or  less  independently  of 
their  respective  organismal  differentials,  and  (2)  those  more  closely  related 
to  organismal  differentials,  which  become  more  severe  in  their  effects  with  in- 
creasing distance  in  relationship  of  the  donor  and  host  species.  But  the 
distinction  between  these  types  is  apparently  not  very  sharp,  being  one  more 
or  less  of  degree. 

In  the  case  of  snakes  we  find  only  to  a  limited  extent,  that  the  phylogenetic 
position  of  the  respective  animals  bears  a  relationship  to  the  character  of  their 
poison  glands,  the  mechanism  by  means  of  which  the  poisons  are  ejected, 
the  nature  and  effects  of  the  venoms,  or  even  to  the  behavior  of  these  animals. 
Important  distinctions  which  can  be  made  between  various  types  of  snakes, 
as,  for  instance,  those  between  poisonous  and  non-poisonous  snakes,  depend 
at  least  partly  on  quantitative  differences  in  the  size  of  the  poison  glands,  in 
the  amount  of  venom  produced,  and  in  the  length  of  the  teeth  along  which 
the  venom  is  ejected.  The  Elapinae  show  certain  characteristic  features  which 
differentiate  them  from  the  Crotalus  type;  thus  the  Cobra  venoms  are  prin- 
cipally neurotoxic,  while  the  venoms  of  the  Viperidae  exert  a  very  strong 
local  action.  Different  types  of  Ancistrodon  show  much  similarity  in  their 
effects.  While,  however,  certain  characteristics  are  thus  common  to  related 
groups  of  these  animals,  there  is  no  definite  gradation  in  the  morphological, 
chemical  and  physiological  factors  which  are  concerned  in  the  production  and 
effects  of  the  various  snake  venoms,  corresponding  to  the  phylogenetic 
relationship,  and  the  poisons  of  very  distant  classes  of  animals  may  show 
marked  similarities  in  their  action.  For  example,  the  mode  of  action  of  Cobra 
venom  is  more  nearly  related  to  that  of  the  venom  of  Heloderma,  which 


562  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

does  not  belong  to  the  snakes,  than  to  that  of  the  venom  of  snakes  of  the 
Crotalus  family,  although  the  Cobra  is  phylogenetically  far  removed  from 
Heloderma.  The  same  lack  of  parallelism  between  the  effects  of  the  venoms 
and  phylogenetic  relationship  holds  good,  also,  as  far  as  the  susceptibility  of 
different  species  of  animals  to  these  poisons  is  concerned.  Thus  in  the  study 
of  the  venom  of  Heloderma  it  was  found  that  the  rat  and  toad  are  relatively 
little  susceptible  to  this  venom ;  in  this  case  we  meet  again  with  peculiarities 
which  stand  outside  the  system  of  phylogenetic  relationship.  Evidently  we 
have  to  deal  with  characteristics  of  production  and  mode  of  action  which 
in  snake  venoms  and  the  venom  of  Heloderma  are  intimately  connected  with 
the  development  of  certain  organs.  In  amphibia  it  is  the  cutaneous  glands  and 
also  the  parotid  or  sublabial  glands,  in  snakes  it  is  presumably  the  parotid 
gland  and  in  Heloderma  the  sublabial  gland  which  undergo  specific  changes ; 
within  certain  groups  of  animals  the  same  kinds  of  organs  may  show  mor- 
phologically, chemically  and  functionally  more  or  less  related  changes. 

It  may  then  be  concluded  that  the  various  animal  venoms  are  not,  in  a 
strict  sense,  representatives  of  substances  carrying  the  organismal  differen- 
tials, but  that  they  may  have  an  indirect  relationship  to  the  latter  in  the  same 
way  as  have  the  structure  of  organs  and  the  organ  differentials.  Furthermore, 
as  already  stated,  with  certain  restrictions  the  various  substances  poduced  in 
an  organism  do  not  exert  a  toxic  action  on  those  cells  and  organs  of  its  own 
body  with  which  they  normally  come  in  contact,  nor  do  they  interact  in  an 
injurious  manner  with  other  substances  normally  produced  in  the  same 
organism;  in  particular,  also,  they  do  not  give  origin  to  the  formation  of 
antibodies. 

These  facts  apply  to  the  animal  toxins  or  venoms  in  general.  The  organisms 
in  which  the  venoms  or  toxins  originate  are,  to  a  large  extent,  although  not 
necessarily  completely,  resistant  to  the  poisonous  effects  they  produce.  Thus 
toads  are  resistant  to  the  digitalis-like  action  of  the  bufagins  and  bufotoxins, 
but  not  to  the  bufotenins  and  to  substances  acting  like  epinephrin.  As  to  the 
mechanism  which  underlies  this  resistance  of  toads,  it  is  restricted  to  that 
organ  which,  in  susceptible  animals,  is  principally  affected  by  these  constit- 
uents of  the  venom,  namely,  the  heart;  such  resistance  extends  also  to  the 
digitalis  group  of  substances  derived  from  plants.  These  effects  must  be 
considered  as  due  to  primary  mechanisms  of  adaptation  and  not  to  secondary 
effects  of  auto-immunization. 

Also,  in  reptiles  the  animals  which  are  carriers  of  the  poison  glands  are, 
to  a  large  extent,  immune  against  their  own  poisons ;  they  possess  an  autog- 
enous as  well  as  a  homoiogenous  immunity.  Heloderma  is  not  susceptible 
to  poisoning  by  its  own  venom,  but  it  is  susceptible  to  the  effects  of  rattlesnake 
venom;  likewise,  certain  non-poisonous  snakes  seem  to  be  susceptible  to 
the  effects  of  Heloderma  venom.  However,  inasmuch  as  the  Heloderma 
venom  is  in  some  essential  respects  similar  in  its  action  to  Cobra  venom,  it 
might  be  expected  that  a  mutual  relative  immunity  exists  in  Heloderma  and 
Cobra  for  both  types  of  venom.  Such  tests  have  not  yet  been  made.  But 
we  have  found  that  Calmette's  Cobra  antivenin  exerts  a  certain  antitoxic 
effect  upon  Heloderma  venom.  A  species  immunity  to  a  toxin  produced  by 


TOXINS  AND  ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  563 

a  certain  species  has  been  observed  also  in  plants.  Blakeslee  noted  that 
colchicine,  an  alkaloid  which  has  specific  effects  on  mitotic  cell  division,  and 
which  may  induce  polyploidy  in  plant  and  animal  tissues  treated  with  this 
substance,  does  not  affect  the  mitotic  divisions  in  Colchicum,  the  plant  from 
which  this  alkaloid  is  derived;  this  is  the  only  higher  plan  examined  so  far 
which  has  been  found  immune  to  it.  However,  Cornman  has  recently  shown 
that  if  very  large  doses  of  colchicine  are  used  mitoses  may  show  the  specific 
effect  of  this  substance  also  in  Colchicum ;  it  is  very  probable  that  the  relative 
immunity  of  Colchicum  is  due  to  the  partial  inactivation  of  the  alkaloid 
produced  by  this  plant  and  not  to  a  lessened  sensitiveness  of  the  mitotic 
process  to  colchicine. 

As  to  the  mechanism  on  which  depends  the  immunity  of  the  various  species 
against  their  own  poisons,  certain  data  are  of  interest.  According  to  Phisalix, 
snakes  which  in  general  are  immune  to  their  own  venom  if  it  is  administered 
in  the  usual  way,  are  found  susceptible  if  the  venom  is  injected  into  the 
brain  substance,  thus  showing  that  the  tissue  immunity  does  not  extend  to 
all  the  tissues  of  the  animal.  In  this  case  the  natural  immunity  of  a  species 
against  its  own  venom  is  therefore  not  dependent  upon  a  real  lack  of  suscep- 
tibility to  the  poison  on  the  part  of  those  qells  upon  which  the  toxic  substance 
principally  acts.  But  some  mechanisms  presumably  exist  which  prevent  the 
poison  from  reaching  the  sensitive  cells.  In  this  connection  it  may  be  men- 
tioned that  Fleisher  and  the  writer  found  that  the  liver  and  kidney  of  Helo- 
derma,  and  of  species  related  to  the  latter,  such  as  the  turtle,  have  the  ability 
to  absorb  Heloderma  venom  more  effectively  than  the  organs  of  species  not 
as  nearly  related  to  Heloderma.  This  suggests  that  these  organs  of  Heloderma 
may  perhaps  be  concerned  in  the  natural  immunity  of  this  animal  against  its 
own  venom,  and  that  possibly  proteins  bearing  organismal  differentials  may 
play  a  role  in  the  process  of  absorption. 

We  have  to  distinguish  from  the  condition  of  relative  immunity  of  an 
organism  against  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  poisons,  a  nonspecific  in- 
crease or  lessening  of  resistance  of  some  species  to  certain  poisons,  irrespec- 
tive of  the  phylogenetic  relation  between  the  species  tested  and  the  species 
which  produces  the  poison.  Various  types  of  mechanisms  may  come  into  play 
in  such  species  differences  and  they  differ  in  different  cases. 

The  differences  in  the  effects  which  the  poisons  of  amphibia  and  reptiles 
exert  in  various  classes  and  species  of  animals  are  similar  to  those  noted  in 
various  species  of  parasites  and  symbionts  in  general,  and  in  particular, 
bacteria  and  protozoa.  In  neither  instance  are  the  effects  determined  primarily 
by  the  genetic  relations  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  host  and 
of  the  bearer  of  the  injurious  agent,  whether  the  latter  is  an  animal  or 
bacterial  toxin ;  if  the  organismal  differentials  play  a  part  at  all  under  such 
conditions,  it  is  only  an  indirect  one,  in  the  same  sense  in  which  also  the 
effectiveness  of  an  organ  differential  may  be  affected  by  its  connection  with 
an  organismal  differential.  Thus  it  is  evident  that  the  virulence  of  certain 
bacteria  for  one  vertebrate  species  and  their  lack  of  virulence  for  another 
does  not  run  parallel  to  the  relationships  of  the  respective  microorganisms 
and  hosts. 


564  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

It  is  well  known  that  some  bacteria  are  quite  harmless  parasites  for  certain 
mammalian  species,  while  others  are  very  injurious,  apparently  without 
regard  to  the  phylogenetic  relationship  between  microorganisms  and  hosts. 
Special  mechanisms  apply  here  which  are  contingent,  in  part  at  least,  on  the 
relations  of  these  microorganisms  and  their  toxins  to  specific  organs.  More- 
over, mechanisms  which  differ  in  the  case  of  different  toxins  may  make  a 
certain  substance  toxic  for  a  given  organ  in  one  species  and  innocuous  for 
the  corresponding  organ  in  another  species.  Hence  it  seems  that  the  injurious 
effect  of  tetanus  toxin  for  some  species  depends  upon  the  power  of  the  brain 
substance  in  this  species  to  bind  this  toxin.  In  a  more  resistant  species  the 
brain  may  have  a  diminished  affinity  for  this  toxin.  Furthermore,  the  degree 
of  injuriousness  of  certain  microorganisms,  and  of  the  substances  given  off 
by  them,  depends  upon  primarily,  preformed  mechanisms  as  well  as  upon 
secondary,  acquired  immune  mechanisms,  which  latter  may  become  effective 
as  the  result  of  a  primary  interaction  between  host  and  parasite,  leading  to 
injury  in  the  host.  The  effects  may  also  vary  in  very  young  and  in  adult  or 
old  host  organisms. 

The  importance  of  both  species  and  organ  in  determining  the  activity 
of  microorganisms  is  especially  clear  in  the  case  of  certain  fungi  or  bacteria, 
which  function  as  symbionts  in  some  species  of  insects.  There  is,  here,  an 
adaptation  not  only  to  a  particular  species  of  insects,  but  also  to  a  particular 
receptive  organ,  a  mycetoma,  which  has  been  formed  from  the  fat  tissue 
surrounding  the  digestive  tract  in  this  species  and  which  is  especially  suitable 
for  the  life  of  the  symbionts.  These  symbionts  are  found  only  in  this  organ 
and  in  one  other  location  in  the  hosts.  The  mycetoma  is  not  produced  in 
response  to  the  presence  of  the  symbionts,  as  might  have  been  assumed,  but 
it  develops  even  when  they  are  lacking.  If  now  the  mycetoma  is  transplanted 
from  the  larvae  of  a  species,  such  as  Periplaneta  or  Psylla,  to  which  these 
microorganisms  are  adapted,  to  the  larvae  of  another  species,  for  example, 
Tenebrio,  to  which  they  are  not  adapted,  the  transplant  may  remain  alive 
throughout  the  life  of  these  larvae;  but  such  transplanted  symbionts  manifest 
no  activity  in  their  new  hosts,  in  contrast  to  the  activity  in  the  old  host  to 
which  they  had  become  adapted. 

The  relations  of  microorganisms  and  their  toxins  to  hosts  are,  then,  in  a 
general  way  comparable  to  those  of  poisonous  reptiles,  amphibia  and  other 
poisonous  animals  and  their  toxins  to  various  species.  These  relations  do  not 
depend  directly  upon  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  symbiont, 
parasite  or  toxic  substance,  although  in  certain  instances  phylogenetic  rela- 
tionships may  play  a  limited  role.  The  factors  which  determine  the  interaction 
between  hosts  and  symbionts,  parasites  and  toxins,  are  in  some  respects 
comparable  to  the  Forssman  differentials,  which  occur  without  regard  for 
phylogenetic  relationship.  The  relations  between  toxins  and  organism  are 
essentially  of  an  organ-specific  character ;  but  there  may  perhaps  to  a  limited 
extent  also  organismal  differentials  be  involved;  the  toxins  show  specific 
adaptations  to  the  species  in  which  they  are  produced,  and  there  is  a  notable 
correspondence  in  the  relations  of  toxins  and  of  parasites  or  symbionts  in  gen- 
eral to  various  species  acting  as  receptors  for  the  toxins,  or  as  hosts  for  the 
parasites  or  symbionts. 


Chapter  p 

The  Chemical   Nature  of  Organismal 

Differentials 

In  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  analyzed  by  means  of  tissue  reactions 
the  individuality  and  species  differentials,  as  well  as  organismal  differ- 
entials in  general.  Immune  reactions  made  it  possible  to  analyze  still 
further  the  species  differentials  and  the  differentials  of  genera,  orders  and 
classes  of  animals,  and  even  of  plants;  but,  individuality  differentials  were 
accessible  to  serological  tests  only  in  a  very  restricted  way.  Immune  reactions 
can  be  used  in  the  study  of  all  those  differentials  which  are  able  to  function 
as  antigens.  This  includes  in  addition  to  the  organismal  differentials,  organ 
differentials,  the  heterogenetic  differentials  of  various  kinds,  and  the  blood- 
group  differentials,  as  well  as  specific  antigens  present  in  certain  micro- 
organisms and  metazoic  cells. 

In  the  majority  of  these  cases  we  have  to  deal  with  substances  which  have 
not  yet  been  isolated  chemically,  but  which  can  be  recognized  and  differentiated 
from  one  another  by  the  tissue  and  serological  reactions  which  they  induce.  As 
to  the  chemical  nature  of  these  substances,  our  knowledge  is  therefore  very 
limited.  However,  there  can  be  little  doubt  that  the  organismal  differentials  are 
proteins ;  this  is  indicated  by  their  great  sensitiveness  to  heat  and  to  the 
action  of  substances  which  are  known  to  denature  proteins.  As  to  the  organ, 
heterogenetic  and  blood-group  differentials,  proteins  may  also  enter  into  their 
constitution,  but  they  may  still  retain  to  a  certain  degree  at  least  their 
characteristics  as  antigens  under  conditions  in  which  proteins  are  denatured. 
Therefore  other  groups  than  proteins  form  part  of  these  antigens.  They 
may  be  conjugated  proteins,  combinations  of  proteins,  acting  as  carriers,  and 
of  complex  carbohydrates,  lipids,  or  simpler  organic  substances  acting  as 
haptens.  The  combinations  with  simpler  substances  are  of  significance  es- 
pecially in  the  state  of  hypersensitiveness.  But  even  simple  inorganic  and 
organic  substances  as  such,  seem  to  be  able  to  induce  idiosyncrasy  in  certain 
individuals  predisposed  to  this  condition,  although  there  is  the  possibility  that 
even  in  this  case  they  become  effective  only  in  combination  with  proteins.  In 
all  these  instances  it  has  been  shown  that  as  a  rule  the  antigenic  function 
proper,  that  is,  the  production  of  immune  substances  or  antibodies,  requires 
the  combination  of  these  non-protein  substances  with  proteins;  but  if  the 
antibodies  have  once  been  formed,  they  may  interact  in  a  specific  manner 
also  with  the  non-protein  material  functioning  as  haptens.  However,  it  has 
been  proven  more  recently  by  Heidelberger  that  in  pneumococci,  type-specific 
and  species-specific  complex  carbohydrates  are  present,  which  may  act  as 
antigens  and  call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies  without  having  previously 
entered  into  combination  with  proteins.  Specific  carbohydrates  have  been  iso- 

565 


566  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

lated  also  from  various  other  microorganisms,  especially  from  streptococci. 

Recent  studies  of  proteins  make  it  very  probable  that  in  the  organism  the 
simpler  peptid  chains  are  present,  not  as  such,  but  in  association  with  one 
another,  and  it  has  been  suggested  that  their  molecular  weights  are  multiples 
of  a  unit  possessing  a  molecular  weight  of  34,500  (Svedberg).  Reversible 
associations  and  dissociations  may  take  place.  According  to  Bergmann,  such 
a  unit  is  built  up  of  288  amino-acid  residues  and  a  protein  may  consist  of 
multiples  of  such  units.  Within  these  units  certain  amino  acids  recur  at 
regular  intervals,  which  are  characteristic  of  different  proteins.  X-ray  studies 
make  it  probable,  moreover,  that  such  protein  chains  may  be  folded  and  that 
parallel  fibers  may  be  linked  together  by  means  of  their  active  sidechains  in  defi- 
nite patterns,  the  distance  of  these  chains  being  ascertainable  by  the  X-ray  pat- 
tern (Meyer  and  Mark,  Astbury).  According  to  Mirsky  and  Pauling,  these 
sidechains  are  united  by  hydrogen  bonds  between  the  peptid  nitrogen  and  the 
oxygen  of  the  carboxyl  group. 

Denaturation  by  heat,  application  of  alkali,  acid  or  various  other  means, 
is  supposed  primarily  to  bring  about  breaks  in  these  sidechain  bonds  and  to 
unfold  the  main  chains.  Denaturation  also  alters  or  reduces  the  specificity  of 
the  proteins ;  it  may  diminish  or  destroy  the  specificity  of  the  antigens  and  it 
destroys  the  individuality  differentials.  Conversely,  in  accordance  with  this 
theory  of  protein  structure,  we  may  assume  that  the  specificity,  and  in  par- 
ticular, also  the  specific  character  of  the  individuality  and  species  differentials, 
depend  upon  the  character  and  distribution  of  these  patterns  and  linkages  as 
well  as  on  the  chemical  constitution  of  the  amino-acids ;  and  it  may  further- 
more be  suggested  that  some  of  these  factors  are  specific  for  cell  and  blood 
proteins  in  different  individuals;  also,  that  all  the  cell  proteins  in  the  same 
individual  must  have  a  certain  characteristic  in  common,  which  differentiates 
these  proteins  from  the  proteins  of  all  other  individuals.  At  present  it  seems 
impossible  to  do  more  than  to  make  this  general  statement  concerning  the 
possible  connections  between  the  nature  of  the  individuality  differentials  and 
theories  of  protein  structure,  of  which  several  have  been  proposed. 

There  is  a  second  series  of  investigations  which  may  throw  some  light  on 
the  structure  of  various  differentials,  although  they  have  more  significance 
for  the  organ,  heterogenetic  and  blood-group  differentials  than  for  the 
organismal  differentials.  These  investigations,  to  which  we  have  already  re- 
ferred, deal  with  the  experimental  modification  of  antigens  and  the  corre- 
sponding changes  in  the  immune  substances  which  are  elicited  by  the  injection 
of  the  modified  antigens.  This  method  of  research  was  inaugurated  by 
Obermayer  and  Pick,  who  thus  laid  the  foundation  for  the  subsequent 
fargoing  analysis  of  the  chemical  nature  of  antigens.  It  is  of  interest,  in  this 
connection,  that  the  discovery  of  Jacques  Loeb  of  the  possibility  of  inducing 
heterogenous  fertilization  by  addition  of  alkali  to  the  medium  in  which  the 
germ  cells  are  suspended,  and  thus  of  modifying  the  specificity  of  the  fertiliza- 
tion process,  suggested  to  Obermayer  and  Pick  the  thought  that  also  the 
antigen  specificity  might  be  accessible  to  changes  by  chemical  means.  They 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  567 

therefore  began  to  study  the  chemical  factors  underlying  the  species  specificity 
of  the  precipitinogens.  Their  principal  finding  was  as  follows:  The  species 
specificity  of  cattle  serum  was  not  greatly  altered  by  heat,  nor  by  such 
substances  as  alkali,  toluol  and  chloroform,  but  it  was  fundamentally  changed 
by  introducing  the  iodine  of  Lugol's  solution  into  the  protein  molecules,  by 
diazotizing  the  protein,  or  by  producing  xanthoproteins  by  means  of  nitric 
acid.  The  species  specificity  was  destroyed  by  the  latter  processes  and  new 
specificities  were  created  instead.  The  antibodies  which  originated  through 
immunization  with  these  new  antigens,  reacted  specifically  also  with  other 
proteins  into  which  similar  chemical  radicles  had  been  introduced,  but  no 
longer  or  very  little  with  the  unaltered  proteins  of  the  original  serum.  Fur- 
thermore, they  made  it  probable  that  it  was  an  aromatic  constituent  of  the 
protein,  tyrosin,  to  which  the  new  group  was  anchored.  They  concluded, 
therefore,  that  the  aromatic  constituents  of  proteins  were  mainly  responsible 
for  the  antigen  specificity. 

These  observations  led  Obermayer  and  Pick  to  distinguish  between  the 
constitutional  and  the  original  structure  of  a  protein ;  by  the  latter  was  meant 
its  species  characteristics.  A  first  type  of  substances,  such  as  acid,  alkali, 
toluol,  as  well  as  application  of  heat,  leave  the  latter  intact  but  change  the 
former,  while  introduction  of  a  second  group  of  radicles,  such  at  N-N,  N02, 
or  J,  Br,  changes  the  species  specificity.  However,  the  distinction  between 
these  two  types  of  specificity  no  longer  seems  to  be  as  sharp  as  Obermayer 
and  Pick  assumed.  A  part  of  the  species-specificity  of  the  serum  may  still 
be  left  even  after  introduction  of  a  new  group  of  the  second  type  of  substances, 
especially  after  diazotation;  on  the  other  hand,  specificities  may  be  modified 
also  by  alkali  and  by  heating.  Furthermore,  even  the  introduction  of  the 
methyl  and  acetyl  group,  or  of  other  groups  which  do  not  combine  with  the 
aromatic  constituent  of  the  protein  molecule,  may  likewise  modify  the  species- 
specificity.  Thus,  as  Landsteiner  has  shown,  esterification  with  acid  alcohol, 
acetylation  and  methylation  may  cause  loss  of  specificity  of  a  protein,  although 
these  groups  do  not  directly  affect  the  aromatic  nucleus  of  the  protein.  But 
essentially,  Obermayer  and  Pick  have  established  some  of  the  basic  facts 
concerning  the  constitution  of  antigens  and  their  species-specificity.  These 
investigators  also  made  the  important  observation  that  a  number  of  partial 
precipitins  may  develop  through  immunization  with  a  protein,  the  constitu- 
tion of  which  has  been  altered  experimentally;  and  some  evidence  has  been 
found  by  subsequent  investigators  which  confirms  the  conclusion  that  the  aro- 
matic protein  group  is  of  great  importance  for  the  specificity  of  the  antigen. 
Thus,  Wells  pointed  out  that  gelatin,  which  lacks  the  aromatic  group,  also 
lacks  antigenic  powers,  and  still  later  it  was  shown  that  the  introduction  of 
the  metanilic  acid  radicle  into  gelatin  changes  the  latter  into  a  potential 
antigen,  which  reacts  also  with  an  antiserum  against  the  combination  of 
another  protein  with  metanilic  acid.  Furthermore,  Wormall  found  that  iodine, 
in  altering  the  specificity  of  the  protein,  combines  with  the  tyrosin  radicle. 
However,  while  all  these  data  point  to  the  conclusion  that  the  character  of 


568  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  aromatic  group  in  the  protein  molecule  is  of  great  importance  in  fixing 
the  species-specific  nature  of  the  latter,  still  it  is  apparently  not  the  only 
determining  factor. 

On  the  foundation  laid  by  Obermayer  and  Pick,  Landsteiner  and  his  asso- 
ciates built  further  and  they  established,  among  others,  the  following  im- 
portant facts: 

(1)  Xanthoprotein  and  diazotized  protein  show  a  close  serological  rela- 
tionship ;  similarly,  there  is  a  strong  cross-reaction  between  iodo-  and  bromo- 
protein ;  but  there  is  a  sharp  serological  distinction  between  the  nitrated  and 
diazotized  protein  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  halogenated  protein  on  the  other. 
These  differences  may  depend  not  only  on  the  nature  and  the  number  of  the 
substituting  groups,  but  also  on  the  place  of  substitution,  and  there  is  an 
indication  of  gradations  in  these  reactions.  While  in  this  way  a  new  specificity 
can  be  produced,  a  remnant  of  the  old  organismal  specificity  may  still  be 
left,  and  although  chemically  altered  horse  serum  calls  forth  the  production 
of  antibodies,  which  react  also  with  other  protein  compounds  which  have 
been  coupled  with  similar  radicles,  still  the  reaction  may  remain  most 
intense  with  the  substituted  compounds  of  horse  serum.  Antiserum  against 
diazobenzene  serum  protein  from  cattle,  precipitates  diazobenzene  protein 
from  cattle  serum,  but  not  that  from  human,  horse  or  rabbit  serum;  nor  is 
there  a  reaction  with  the  native,  unchanged  serum  from  cattle.  Thus  it 
becomes  conceivable  that  diseased  or  functionally  changed  tissues  may  give 
off  proteins,  which  may  act  as  antigens  in  other  individuals  of  the  same 
species.  We  have  here  to  deal  with  the  combination  of  a  species  and  a  struc- 
tural specificity  of  certain  substances,  which  recalls  the  complex  specificity 
due  to  the  combination  of  organ  and  organismal  specificities  previously  dis- 
cussed. However,  the  chemical  alteration  of  a  protein  must  be  fargoing  if 
the  immune  serum  is  to  react  with  antigens  derived  from  a  different,  non- 
related  species  into  which  the  same  group  has  been  introduced. 

(2)  Introduction  of  complex  organic  groups,  together  with  the  diazo  and 
certain  other  radicles,  increases  the  specificity  of  the  reaction  to  the  new 
substance.  Of  special  importance  in  determining  the  specificity  of  the  azo- 
protein  are  acid  groups  which  are  introduced  into  the  benzene  ring,  while 
the  introduction  of  methyl,  methoxyl,  halogen  and  nitro  groups  is  less  effec- 
tive in  changing  the  specific  character  of  the  antigenic  substance. 

(3)  Likewise,  the  position  of  certain  groups  introduced  into  the  protein 
molecule  helps  to  determine  the  specificity  of  the  latter.  Hence  the  same 
group,  if  introduced  into  the  ortho,  meta  or  para  position,  calls  forth  in  each 
case  the  production  of  specific  antibodies,  although  weaker  cross-reactions 
may  occur  also  with  other  than  the  homologous  antibodies.  The  specificity  of 
these  substances  is  therefore  not  absolute,  but  relative  and  graded,  and 
there  are,  moreover,  certain  preparations  which  elicit  reactions  that  do  not 
conform  to  the  expected  specificity.  In  addition  to  the  ortho,  meta  and  para 
positions,  also  differences  in  the  stereoisomeric  constitution  of  certain  sub- 
stances may  yield  specific  antibodies. 

(4)  Perhaps  the  most  important  finding  of  Landsteiner,  however,  con- 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  569 

cerns  the  possibility  of  synthesizing  antigens  by  combining  a  substance,  which 
alone  is  unable  to  produce  antibody  formation,  with  a  foreign,  heterogenous 
protein  or  serum  and  thus  to  obtain  a  complete  antigenic  substance.  The 
serum  in  this  case  acts  as  "carrier"  for  the  specific  substance,  the  hapten, 
which  latter  does  not  need  to  be  a  protein.  Landsteiner  first  synthesized  in 
this  way  a  hapten  and  a  protein  carrier  in  the  case  of  the  Forssman  antigen 
by  combining  the  alcohol  extract  from  heterogenetic  organs  with  hog  serum. 
As  in  Obermayer's  and  Pick's  observations,  the  protein  in  the  original 
antigen  and  in  the  substance  with  which  the  antibody  is  tested  do  not  need 
to  be  identical,  and  if  they  are  very  different,  then  the  specificity  may  be 
limited  to  the  hapten.  The  hapten  alone  may  be  able  to  react  with  the  anti- 
body, provided  it  possesses  a  sufficiently  large  molecule,  and  especially  if 
this  molecule  has  colloidal  properties.  Landsteiner  succeeded  by  these  means 
in  separating  the  ability  of  an  antigenic  substance  to  elicit  the  production 
of  an  immune  substance  from  its  ability  to  react  with  such  an  immune 
substance,  and  he  furthermore  recognized  as  a  distinct  property  of  an  antigen, 
or  of  a  part  of  an  antigen,  the  power  to  inhibit  in  a  specific  manner  the 
reaction  between  antigen  and  immune  substance.  While  as  stated,  the  first  of 
these  functions  requires  as  a  rule  a  combination  of  a  hapten,  which  may  be  a 
non-protein  substance,  and  a  carrier  of  a  protein  nature,  the  latter  two  func- 
tions may  be  exerted  by  the  hapten  alone. 

In  studying  antibodies  against  azoproteins,  Landsteiner  found  that  the 
action  of  an  antibody,  which  developed  against  a  well  defined  chemical 
substance,  was  not  confined  to  the  antigenic  substance,  but  it  included  sub- 
stances chemically  similar  to  the  homologous  antigen.  Landsteiner  concluded 
that  the  serological  cross-reactions  of  the  proteins  of  related  animals  are  due 
to  similarities  in  the  chemical  structure  of  these  substances.  This  constitutes 
at  least  one  of  the  possibilities  of  such  cross-reactions. 

As  to  the  inhibiting  effect  of  haptens,  Landsteiner  extended  an  early 
observation  of  Halban  and  thus  found  that  even  in  cases  in  which  the  hapten 
does  not  undergo  a  visible  reaction  with  the  antibody,  its  presence  may  be 
recognized  by  its  specific  inhibiting  effect  on  precipitation,  complement  fixa- 
tion, and  hemolysis,  which  would  otherwise  occur  if  the  full  antigen  were 
brought  into  contact  with  the  antibody.  It  could  furthermore  be  shown  that 
the  reaction  between  hapten  and  antibody  was  the  more  specific  the  more 
complex  the  structure  of  the  hapten.  If  more  simple  substances  served  as 
haptens,  the  reaction  did  not  need  to  be  specific.  Again,  it  was  especially  the 
aromatic  groups  which  tended  to  determine  the  specificities  in  the  antigen- 
antibody  reaction.  By  means  of  this  reaction  Wormall  showed  that  if  iodine 
enters  in  combination  with  the  tyrosin  group  of  the  protein,  it  calls  forth  a 
new  specificity,  and  that  3.5  iodotyrosin  can  specifically  inhibit  the  reaction 
between  iodoprotein  and  its  antiserum. 

We  have  mentioned  already  that  the  carrier  protein,  as  a  rule,  should  be 
of  a  heterogenous  nature,  but  in  certain  cases  a  homoiogenous,  and,  perhaps, 
even  an  autogenous  serum  may  exert  a  similar  effect.  Thus,  as  mentioned, 
Klopstock  and   Selters  believe  that  in  the  guinea  pig  a   combination  of 


570  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

diazotized  atoxyl  with  the  animal's  own  serum  may  serve  as  antigen.  We 
have  discussed  this  problem  in  a  preceding  chapter.  However,  while  foreign 
sera  seem  to  fulfill  the  function  of  carriers  of  the  haptens  efficiently, 
Armangue,  Gonzales  and  Morata  have  shown  that  the  Forssman  differential, 
which  by  itself  is  not  at  all  or  only  very  slightly  antigenic,  can  be  converted 
into  an  active  antigen  also  by  mixing  it  with  kaolin  or  other  absorbent 
substances  instead  of  with  serum.  Zogaya  has  found  that  a  complex  bacterial 
polysaccharide  may  serve  as  a  satisfactory  antigen  if  it  is  first  absorbed  by 
collodion  or  carbon  particles.  Landsteiner  and  Jacobs  confirmed  these  obser- 
vations, but  they  also  noted  that  purified  bacterial  polysaccharides  or  other 
complex  carbohydrates,  when  freed  as  much  as  possible  from  N-containing 
substances,  can  no  longer  be  activated  by  these  non-specific,  absorbent  colloids, 
and  the  same  applies  to  the  purified  Forssman  differential.  It  seems,  then, 
that  certain  impurities  which  are  mixed  with  the  differentials  may  somehow 
enhance  their  antigenic  power,  and  this  process  can  be  still  further  accen- 
tuated by  combination  with  absorbent  colloids. 

It  has  been  noted  by  Goebel  and  Avery  that  also  some  glucosides  in  com- 
bination with  heterogenous  proteins  may  act  as  haptens;  in  this  case, 
stereoisomeric  differences  may  help  to  determine  specificity  and,  therefore, 
the  substitution  of  a  galactose  for  the  glucose  radicle  in  the  glucoside  may 
lead  to  a  new  specificity.  The  stereoisomeric  differences  in  the  galactose  and 
glucose  group  resulted  in  the  formation  of  specific  antibodies.  It  is  of  interest 
in  this  connection  that  while  in  the  composite  antigen  the  glucoside  and 
protein  are  combined  into  one  substance,  two  separate  antibodies  seem  to 
develop  in  response  to  the  injection  of  this  antigen,  and  these  are  apparently 
distinct  from  each  other;  moreover,  it  was  found  possible  to  remove  the 
one  by  specific  absorption  without  at  the  same  time  removing  the  other.  The 
glucoside  as  such,  acting  as  hapten,  inhibited  only  the  interaction  of  the 
anti-carbohydrate  antibody  and  not  that  of  the  anti-protein  antibody  with  the 
antigen.  In  general,  it  may  be  stated  that,  in  accordance  with  the  findings  of 
Landsteiner,  a  simple  antigen,  in  which  the  chemical  constitution  of  the  hapten 
is  well  known,  may  cause  the  production  of  several  distinct  antibodies,  which 
are  directed  against  different  groups  in  these  antigens  and  which  can  be 
removed  by  specific  absorption.  Or  the  antibody  may  represent,  perhaps,  a 
very  complex  composite  structure,  in  which  different  groups  combine  with 
different  component  parts  of  the  antigens  chemically,  with  different  degrees 
of  firmness ;  and  conversely,  there  may  be  different  degrees  of  dissociation 
between  the  constituents  in  the  antigen  and  antibody  combination.  In  this  way 
Heidelberger  interpreted  the  occurrence  of  various  kinds  of  cross-reactions 
between  antisera  and  antigens. 

Goebel  in  more  recent  investigations  analyzed  still  further  the  conditions 
which  cause  the  specificity  of  antigens  by  the  use  of  artificial  antigens  against 
various  types  of  pneumococci.  One  of  these  antigens  contained  the  azobenzol 
glucoside  of  glucuronic  acid,  the  other,  that  of  galacturonic  acid.  The  differ- 
ence in  stereoisomeric  constitution  of  these  two  glucosides  has  a  marked 
influence  on  the  serological  specificity  of  these  two  antigens.  The  immune 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  571 

bodies  produced  in  rabbits  by  injection  with  the  glucuronic  acid  antigen 
protects  mice  against  infection  with  Type  II  pneumococci ;  the  antiserum 
with  the  galacturonic  acid  antigen  is  ineffective.  Furthermore,  the  immune 
serum  of  rabbits  injected  with  p-aminobenzyl  (1  cellobiuronide  confers  passive 
immunity  in  Types  III  and  VIII  pneumococcal  infection,  whereas  the  serum 
of  rabbits  immunized  with  p-aminobenzyl  (S  gentiobiuronide  is  inactive.  But 
both  immune  sera  against  cellobiuronic  acid  and  gentiobiuronic  acid  provide 
passive  immunity  against  Type  II  pneumococcus  infection.  If  the  glucuronic 
acids  are  removed  from  the  antigens,  no  protection  is  obtained  against  Type 
II  pneumococcus.  It  may  therefore  be  concluded  that  in  the  latter  case  the 
two  glucuronic  acids  are  the  active  constituents  of  the  antigen.  On  the  other 
hand,  immunity  against  Types  III  and  VIII  pneumococcal  infection  depends 
upon  the  particular  union  between  the  two  constituents  of  the  two  disac- 
charides,  cellobiuronide  and  gentiobiuronide,  one  kind  of  union  being  effective 
while  the  other  is  ineffective. 

Not  only  have  relatively  simple  organic  substances,  joined  to  protein  by 
means  of  diazotization,  served  as  haptens,  but  also  alcohol  extracts  of  various 
cells  and  organs  which,  in  combination  with  protein,  function  as  antigens  and 
call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies.  In  this  way,  Forssman  heterogenetic 
antigens,  blood-group  antigens,  especially  the  antigen  for  blood  group  A,  and 
organ-specific  antigens  have  been  used.  The  latter  have  been  prepared  also 
from  boiled  organs.  In  general,  these  alcohol  soluble  haptens  are  heat  stable. 
They  function  as  complete  antigens  and  call  forth  the  production  of  anti- 
bodies in  combination  with  protein,  especially  the  protein  of  a  heterogenous 
blood  serum.  At  first  it  was  assumed  that  the  haptens  in  these  alcohol  extracts 
were  lipids,  but  subsequent  investigations  made  their  lipid  nature  doubtful 
in  many  instances.  In  accordance  with  the  work  of  Landsteiner  and  Levene, 
it  is  now  assumed  that  the  Forssman  hapten  is  a  combination  of  a  carbo- 
hydrate and  a  lipid,  and  it  is  furthermore  assumed  that  a  carbohydrate  may 
be  present  also  in  the  blood-group  antigen.  As  to  the  organ  antigens,  they 
may  be  proteins,  in  which,  however,  other  groups  are  active  than  those  which 
represent  the  organismal  and  especially  the  individuality  differentials.  The 
active  organ  differential  groups  are  heat  stable.  Some  organ  and  "substance" 
antigens  are  conjugated  proteins  or  combinations  between  haptens  and 
proteins. 

In  regard  to  the  organismal  differentials,  especially  the  individuality  and 
species  differentials,  these  depend  essentially  on  certain  characteristic  proper- 
ties of  proteins,  which  the  various  parts  of  an  individual,  or  the  individuals 
composing  a  species,  have  in  common.  In  the  beginning  of  this  chapter  we 
have  already  discussed  some  of  the  properties  of  cell  and  tissue  proteins  and 
have  mentioned  the  fact  that  the  individuality  differential  is  lost  whenever 
the  proteins  are  denatured.  We  have  furthermore  stated  that  the  process  of 
denaturation  may  depend  primarily  on  a  breaking  of  linkages  between  certain 
sidegroups  in  parallel  peptid  chains  or  in  the  same  peptid  chain  coiled  upon 
itself,  and  such  a  breaking  of  linkages  must  therefore  destroy  the  individ- 
uality differential ;  or  it  may  depend  upon  a  process  of  uncoiling.  This  does 


572  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

not  indicate,  however,  wherein  the  individuality  differentials  of  different  indi- 
viduals differ  from  each  other.  In  a  similar  manner  we  have  seen  that  the 
introduction  of  new  sidechains  or  haptens  into  a  protein  may  change  or 
destroy  the  species  differentials ;  but  it  would  not  necessarily  follow  that 
actually  the  various  species  differentials  represent  combinations  of  proteins 
with  different  sidechains  or  haptens;  on  the  contrary,  it  seems  certain  that 
as  far  as  haptens  are  concerned  pure  proteins  may  be  representative  of  species 
differentials.  Still,  our  knowledge  as  to  the  chemical  properties  of  proteins, 
on  which  these  species  differentials  depend,  is  extremely  fragmentary.  It  is 
the  tissue  and  serological  reactions  which  have  given  us  our  first  basic  and, 
so  far,  the  only  definite  data  regarding  the  organismal  differentials.  How- 
ever, some  of  the  chemical-physical  differences  which  have  been  established 
between  the  proteins  of  different  species  may  be  suggestive  in  this  connection ; 
no  positive  data  of  this  kind  exist  regarding  individuality  differentials.  As 
mentioned,  in  the  beginning  of  this  chapter,  more  recent  investigations,  espe- 
cially those  of  Svedberg,  indicate  that  the  native  cell  and  tissue  proteins  are 
more  complex  and  represent  longer  peptid  chains  than  had  been  assumed. 
In  particular,  concerning  the  hemocyanins,  Svedberg  has  shown  that  the 
molecular  weights  of  these  substances,  as  they  are  present  in  the  blood  of 
certain  species,  are  always  simple  multiples  of  the  well  defined  component  with 
the  lowest  molecular  weight.  These  components  are  interconnected  by  reversible 
dissociation-association  reactions,  which  are  influenced  by  the  pH.  The  range 
of  pH  in  which  these  complex  hemocyanin  molecules  are  stable  is  characteristic 
of  the  hemocyanins  of  different  species.  But  marked  differences  in  the  pH 
stability  diagram  occur  only  for  species  belonging  to  different  orders.  All  the 
species  of  the  same  order  have  similar  diagrams.  In  addition  to  this  pH  range, 
the  isoelectric  point  of  the  hemocyanins  of  different  species  is  to  some  extent 
characteristic  of  the  species. 

In  regard  to  the  hemoglobins,  the  extensive  investigations  of  Reichert  and 
Brown  to  which  we  have  already  referred,  have  shown  that  their  crystal  form 
differs  in  different  species ;  likewise,  the  readiness  with  which  they  crystallize 
differs.  But  there  is  the  possibility  that  in  these  determinations  other  proteins 
from  cells  may  have  been  admixed  to  the  hemoglobin  crystals  and  may  have 
contributed  to  the  differences  between  the  crystals  of  different  species.  As  to 
the  chemical  constitution  of  hemoglobins,  it  seems  that  the  hemoglobins  of 
horse,  sheep,  cattle  and  dog  contain  the  same  amount  of  the  basic  amino-acids, 
arginin,  histidin  and  lysin,  but  differ  in  their  cystin  content  and  in  the  amount 
of  total  sulfur  (Block  and  Vickery).  Horse  and  donkey  hemoglobin  differ 
also  in  their  solubility,  although  they  cannot  be  distinguished  by  the  precipitin 
test  (Landsteiner  and  Heidelberger).  Bailey  has  found  that  in  myosin  the 
amid  nitrogen,  expressed  in  percentage  of  total  nitrogen,  is  about  the  same 
in  mammals,  birds,  fish  and  lobster;  and  the  same  applies  as  far  as  the 
percentage  composition  of  cystin,  methionin,  tyrosin  and  tryptophan  is  con- 
cerned. On  the  other  hand,  the  differences  between  the  amino-acids  which 
occur  in  myogen  and  myosin  within  the  same  species  are  very  considerable, 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  573 

and  much  greater  than  the  differences  between  the  myosins  of  quite  un- 
related species. 

It  is  probable  that  not  only  the  nature  of  the  bonds  between  sidechains  in 
the  same  protein,  but  also  the  nature  of  the  sidechains  as  such,  may  differ 
in  different  proteins.  Likewise,  according  to  Bergmann,  the  various  natural 
proteins  differ  from  each  other  in  that  their  individual  amino-acid  constituents 
are  represented  by  different  frequencies  within  the  complex  protein  molecule. 
This  view  implies  that  the  physical-chemical  and  biological  properties  of  a 
particular  protein  depend  in  the  last  analysis  on  the  frequencies  with  whix:h 
the  constituent  amino-acid  residues  recur  within  its  peptid  chain.  However, 
no  sharp  distinction  is  made  here  between  species-specific  and  organ-  or 
"substance"-specific  proteins.  Of  great  interest  is  the  suggestion  of  Bergmann 
that  it  is  the  cell  enzymes,  the  proteinases  (papainases)  which  not  only  split 
the  proteins,  but  also  synthesize  them  from  the  constituent  amino-acids  of 
the  foodstuffs,  and  which,  because  they  have  a  specific  constitution,  specifically 
determine  the  specificity  of  the  cell  proteins  which  they  build  up ;  therefore, 
the  cell  enzymes  and  cell  proteins  must  in  each  instance  have  the  same 
specific  structural  characteristics ;  the  process  of  constructing  these  proteins 
would  thus  be  autokatalytic.  However,  'according  to  such  a  conception  this 
autokatalytic  process  should  primarily  lead  to  the  new  formation  of  specific 
enzymes  rather  than  of  specific  cell  substratum.  But  it  may  be  assumed  that 
secondarily  these  specific  proteinases  would  also  build  up  the  cell  proteins 
in  such  a  way  that  they  possess  the  same  characteristic  species  differentials 
as  the  enzymes.  This  conception  was  applied  to  the  species  differentials  of 
cell  proteins;  but  if  it  should  be  extended  to  the  individuality  differentials, 
then  it  would  be  necessary  to  assume  that  also  in  the  different  tissues  of  the 
same  individual  the  proteinases  not  only  possess  the  same  species  differential, 
but  also  the  same  individuality  differential,  and  these  enzymes  should  then 
differ  in  the  reactions  they  call  forth  in  different  individuals  in  accordance 
with  the  differences  in  their  individuality  differentials.  However,  such  dis- 
tinctions between  the  enzymes  of  different  individuals  have  not  yet  been  noted. 

By  means  of  electrophoresis,  Landsteiner  could  distinguish  the  egg 
albumins  of  chicken,  guinea  hen  and  turkey  from  those  of  duck  and  goose, 
but  he  could  not  establish  definite  differences  within  these  two  groups.  It  was 
therefore  possible  to  distinguish  between  the  proteins  of  species  belonging  to 
different  orders,  but  not  possible  to  distinguish  between  those  belonging  to 
the  same  order,  such  as  chicken,  guinea  hen,  and  turkey,  or  duck  and  goose, 
though  these  could  be  distinguished  by  means  of  the  precipitin  reaction.  This 
lack  of  differences  in  the  electrophoretic  mobility  of  some  of  the  egg 
albumins  obtained  from  different  species  of  birds  is  in  contrast  to  the  dis- 
covery, by  Tiselius,  of  three  different  fractions  differing  in  their  electro- 
phoretic behavior  in  the  apparently  homogeneous  globulin  of  rabbit  serum. 
It  is  possible  that  in  the  protein  molecules  the  organismal  differential, 
which  may  function  also  as  antigen,  is  determined  not  by  a  small  group,  but 
by  larger  groups ;  this  is  suggested  by  the  multiplicity  of  cross-reactions 


574  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

between  the  organismal  differential  (antigen)  of  a  certain  species  and  the 
various  antibodies  present  in  the  immune  serum;  the  pattern  of  the  protein 
corresponding  to  the  order  in  which  certain  amino-acid  radicles  recur  in  the 
molecule  may  perhaps  be  a  factor  which  helps  to  determine  the  character  of 
the  antibody.  This  view  agrees  also  with  the  views  recently  expressed  by 
Landsteiner  and  with  the  observations  of  the  latter  that  the  specificity  of 
immune  sera  for  polypeptides  may  depend  upon  a  pentapeptide  in  its  entirety. 
Therefore,  large  groups  and  their  specific  pattern  of  amino  acids  may  deter- 
mine phylogenetic  relationship.  On  the  other  hand,  in  contrast  to  the  organis- 
mal differentials,  the  specificity  of  other  antigens  such  as  the  various  ag- 
glutinogens which  determine  the  specific  blood-group  reactions  and  which 
seem  to  be  complex  nitrogen-containing  carbohydrates,  may  be  quite  distinct 
from  each  other  and  not  show  multiple  intermediate  substances.  Here  the 
differences  between  the  various  antigens  can  be  conceived  as  of  a  more  abrupt 
nature  and  perhaps  due  to  single  groups  sharply  differentiated  from  those 
of  other  analogous  antigens. 

While  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  it  is  the  proteins  which  primarily 
determine  the  specificity  of  the  organismal  differentials,  there  are  some 
serological  experiments  which  indicate  that  in  certain  cases  also  some  other 
hapten-like  substances  may  perhaps  be  concerned  in  similar  reactions.  Thus, 
it  has  been  observed  that  while  whole  erythrocytes  are  required  in  order  to 
produce  species-specific  antisera  for  the  red  corpuscles  of  certain  species, 
alcohol  extracts  of  the  same  kind  of  red  corpuscles  may  react  specifically 
with  such  immune  sera ;  it  appears  therefore  that  in  this  case  the  antigen 
contains  an  alcohol  soluble  hapten,  and  as  Landsteiner  has  shown,  the 
hemolytic  action  of  such  species-spectific  hemolysins  may  be  inhibited  by 
addition  of  ether  extracts  of  such  red  corpuscles  to  the  antibody.  These 
observations  would  agree  with  the  finding  made  in  the  course  of  our  trans- 
plantations of  tissues  and  previously  discussed,  that  the  species  differentials 
differ  from  the  individuality  differentials  in  that  the  former  are  somewhat 
less  heat  sensitive  than  the  latter.  These  complex  species  differentials  present 
in  erythrocytes  could  resemble  the  organ  differentials  which  withstand  boiling 
in  contrast  to  the  typical  species  differentials  which  are  destroyed  by  boiling; 
the  organ,  tissue  or  substance  specificity  may  perhaps  reside  in  the  hapten, 
while  the  typical  species  specificity  resides  presumably  in  the  protein  with 
which  the  hapten  is  associated.  In  these  particular  substances  the  species- 
specific  component  of  the  antigen  may  then  perhaps  consist  of  a  hapten  of  a 
non-protein  nature.  An  important  point  to  be  considered  in  this  connection 
is  the  fact  that  the  presence  of  a  chemical  factor,  graded  as  to  phylogenetic 
relationship  of  the  animal  group  and  characteristic  of  the  typical  organismal 
differentials,  has  apparently  not  been  demonstrated  in  these  antigens  or  in 
parts  of  the  antigens  contained  in  the  alcohol  extracts. 

It  might  therefore  perhaps  be  necessary  to  distinguish  between  the  primary 
species  differentials  of  protein  nature,  and  secondary  complex  differentials 
which  represent  combinations  of  organ  or  "substance"  differentials  and  the 
species  differentials,  an  interpretation  which  we  have  mentioned  in  previous 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  575 

discussions.  We  have  already  referred  to  the  polysaccharides  which  are 
found  in  cell  constituents  in  many  kinds  of  bacteria  and  which  are  character- 
istic of  certain  types  and  species  of  bacteria,  especially  of  pneumococci.  They 
were  first  discovered  in  pneumococci  by  Heidelberger.  Each  type  of  pneumo- 
coccus  has  its  own  kind  of  polysaccharide.  These  complex  carbohydrates 
function,  as  a  rule,  as  haptens,  which  in  combination  with  foreign  proteins 
may  act  as  full  antigens ;  but  the  polysaccharides  of  Types  II  and  III  pneumo- 
cocci may,  as  such,  act  as  antigens.  As  Heidelberger  has  shown,  the  polysaccha- 
ride of  Type  III  pneumococcus  consists  of  numerous  units  of  cellobiuronic 
acid,  while  a  single  unit  is  antigenically  ineffective,  a  combination  of  several 
units  may  unite  as  antigen  with  the  specific  antibody  in  anti-pneumococcus 
type  III  horseserum.  It  is  possible  that  within  the  bacterial  cells  these 
polysaccharides  are  combined  with  proteins.  In  the  case  of  the  pneumo- 
cocci it  can  be  shown  that  they  are  not  diffusely  distributed  within  the  cell, 
but  form  a  constituent  of  the  bacterial  capsule.  As  far  as  a  comparison  is 
possible  between  simple  unicellular  and  higher,  very  complex  organisms, 
these  carbohydrates  may  be  compared  to  organ  differentials  of  higher 
organisms  rather  than  to  organismal  differentials;  they  are  localized  in 
certain  parts  of  the  cells  and  as  a  rule  act  as  antigens  only  in  combination 
with  other  substances ;  but  at  the  same  time  they  are  specific  for  group  and 
also  for  species  of  these  unicellular  organisms  in  the  same  way  as  organ 
differentials  may  carry  a  species  differential.  It  appears  probable  that  also  in 
bacteria  protein  substances  situated  within  the  cell  body  are  the  carriers  of 
the  typical  species  and  class  differentials,  and  quite  recently  Heidelberger 
and  Kendall  have  begun  to  separate  such  substances  by  methods  which  pre- 
vent or  diminish  much  their  hydrolysis  during  the  process  of  preparation; 
some  of  them  may  be  fully  antigenic. 

Within  cells  there  arise  also  the  enzymes,  endoenzymes  and  exoenzymes, 
as  they  might  be  called,  which  likewise  show  various  kinds  of  specificities. 
From  a  functional  point  of  view,  their  most  marked  specificity  relates  to  the 
substratum  on  which  they  act  and  which  they  convert  into  different  substances, 
either  by  splitting  or  by  synthesizing  processes.  Enzymes  are  characterized  by 
this  specific  effect,  by  the  conditions  under  which  they  act,  and  by  their  place 
of  origin.  In  accordance  with  their  intimate  connection  with  cells,  they  consist 
of  proteins  which  in  some  instances  may  function  in  combination  with 
prosthetic  groups,  especially  also  with  certain  vitamins.  These  proteins  have 
been  obtained  in  crystalline  form  (Sumner,  Northrop,  Kunitz  and  others). 
It  has  been  shown  that  some  enzymes  develop  from  precursor  substances 
which  also  have  been  obtained  in  crystalline  form  (Northrop,  Kunitz)  ;  thus 
pepsin,  trypsin  and  chymotrypsin  are  derived  from  pepsinogen,  trypsinogen 
and  chymotrypsinogen.  In  addition,  there  has  been  distinguished  among  the 
pancreatic  proteolytic  enzymes,  heterotrypsin  and  beta  and  gamma  chymo- 
trypsin. The  substratum  specificity  of  these  enzymes  goes  farther  than  has 
been  assumed,  and  Bergmann  has  shown  that  simple  peptides  can  be  found 
on  which  the  various  proteolytic  enzymes  of  the  pancreas  exert  a  specific 
splitting  effect.  It  is  the  enzyme  itself  which  may  convert  the  precursor  sub- 


576  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

stance  into  active  enzyme  by  an  autokatalytic  reaction.  But  this  latter  type  of 
reaction  shows  only  a  very  imperfect  specificity.  Pepsin  transforms  pepsinogen 
into  pepsin,  and  trypsin  causes  the  activation  of  trypsinogen,  but  trypsin 
exerts  the  same  function  also  towards  chymotrypsinogen.  While  thus  the 
activating  enzyme  possesses  only  a  limited  specificity,  the  substratum  on 
which  the  enzyme  acts — in  this  case  the  precursor  substance — undergoes  spe- 
cific changes ;  thus  chymotrypsinogen  can  only  be  converted  into  chymotrypsin, 
whatever  the  nature  of  the  activator  may  be. 

In  those  enzymes  which  consist  of  a  combination  of  a  protein  and  a 
prosthetic  group,  specificities  in  the  character  and  action  of  the  enzymes  may 
depend  not  only  upon  the  nature  of  the  protein  but  also  upon  differences  in 
the  prosthetic  group,  or  in  the  manner  in  which  the  prosthetic  group  and  the 
protein  are  linked.  Specific  differences  in  the  production  of  such  enzymes  in 
different  cells  may,  according  to  Robbins,  depend  upon  the  different  ability 
of  different  cells  to  produce  a  vitamin  which  forms  a  constituent  part  of  the 
enzyme.  As  to  the  relations  between  enzymes  and  organismal  differentials, 
nothing  is  known  in  regard  to  individuality  differentials  in  enzymes.  How- 
ever, there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  corresponding  enzymes  of  dif- 
ferent species  are  distinct,  although  such  differences  cannot  always  be  dem- 
onstrated by  means  of  immune  reactions.  Thus  Kirk  and  Sumner  could  not 
definitely  distinguish  between  the  urease  of  soy  bean  and  of  jack  bean  by 
means  of  the  precipitin  reaction  or  by  using  the  protective  action  of  immune 
sera  as  a  test.  But  that  species  differences  exist  has  been  shown  through  a 
study  of  the  solubilities  of  various  enzymes ;  for  example,  the  solubilities  of 
cattle  and  swine  pepsin  differ  from  each  other.  In  certain  instances  a  species- 
specificity  has  been  demonstrated  also  by  the  production  of  immune  substances, 
especially  of  precipitins,  and  of  localized  anaphylaxis  in  the  guinea  pig.  Ten 
Broeck  used  the  uterus  of  the  guinea  pig  as  test  organ  and  was  able  to  dis- 
tinguish between  trypsin  from  cattle  and  swine  and  also  between  chymotrypsin 
and  chymotrypsinogen.  Seastone  and  Herriot,  by  means  of  the  precipitin  re- 
action, could  distinguish  swine,  cattle  and  guinea  pig  pepsin  from  rabbit  and 
chicken  pepsin;  but  pepsin  from  swine,  cattle  and  guinea  pig  could  not  be 
differentiated  from  one  another  by  these  means.  On  the  other  hand,  pepsin 
and  pepsinogen  could  be  distinguished  by  the  use  of  the  precipitin  reaction. 
Moreover,  precipitins  for  enzymes  did  not  react  with  serum  proteins  of  the 
corresponding  species.  It  may  therefore  be  concluded  that  the  proteolytic 
enzymes  of  the  pancreas  and  stomach,  and  their  precursors,  possess  substance 
and  organ  specificity;  furthermore,  that  the  corresponding  enzymes  and 
their  precursors  from  different  species  differ  in  their  constitution;  but  no 
proof  has  been  given  so  far  that  this  difference  corresponds  to  the  graded 
relationship  of  the  various  species,  or  that  these  enzymes  have  a  chemical 
characteristic  in  common  with  proteins  in  other  organs  of  individuals  be- 
longing to  the  same  species ;  nor  has  it  been  shown  that  they  possess  indi- 
viduality  differentials. 

We  have  mentioned  already  that  in  the  process  of  transformation  of  the 
precursor  substance  into  the  active  enzyme,  the  specificity  resides  in  the 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  577 

precursor  rather  than  in  the  enzyme  which  induces  this  reaction.  This  applies 
also  as  far  as  the  species  specificity  of  the  enzymes  and  their  precursors  is 
concerned.  As  Herriot,  Bartz  and  Northrop  have  shown,  swine  pepsinogen 
can  be  converted  only  into  swine  pepsin  and  chicken  pepsinogen  into  chicken 
pepsin,  irrespective  of  the  species  character  of  the  enzyme  which  serves  as 
catalyst  of  this  reaction. 

A  very  marked  organ  and  perhaps  also  organismal  specificity  of  enzymes 
has  been  found  in  Limulus  (Loeb  and  Bodansky).  In  this  species,  urease 
occurs  in  the  bodyfluid,  muscle,  and  even  in  the  eggs.  Moreover,  a  urease  is 
present  in  the  amoebocyte  tissue  prepared  from  the  amoebocytes  of  the  body- 
fluids.  This  enzyme  has  been  found  so  far  only  in  Limulus  and  not  in  any 
of  the  arthropods  which  have  been  examined  for  its  presence.  But  in 
Limulus  the  urease  obtained  from  amoebocytes  differs  from  that  found  in  the 
other  organs  or  tissues  in  that  the  amoebocyte-tissue  enzyme  combines  with 
various  kations,  and  the  degree  of  its  activity  depends  upon  the  kind  of 
kation  with  which  it  is  combined ;  but  heavy  metal  combinations  of  the 
enzyme  are  inactive,  probably  because  they  induce  denaturation.  This  urease 
represents  therefore,  in  all  probability,  a  metal  protein  combination.  If  the 
enzyme  obtained  from  various  organs  of^  Limulus  is  injected  into  the  body- 
fluids  of  this  animal  in  sufficient  quantity,  urea  is  transformed  into  ammonium 
carbonate,  a  substance  which  is  toxic  and  lethal. 

Similar  in  certain  respects  to  the  action  of  enzymes  is  that  of  some  viruses, 
such  as  the  virus  of  tobacco  mosaic  disease,  which  has  been  found  to  be  a 
crystalline  nucleoprotein  (Stanley),  and  bacteriophage,  which  is  also  a 
nucleoprotein,  according  to  Northrop.  With  this  interpretation  accord  the 
experiments  of  Bronfenbrenner  and  Kalmanson  which  have  made  it  very 
probable  that  bacteriophages  do  not  multiply  as  bacteria  do,  but  are  con- 
tinually newly  formed  by  the  type  of  bacteria  in  which  they  originated.  On 
the  other  hand  there  should  be  considered  also  the  strong  indication  that 
bacteriophage  occurs  in  association  with  larger  particles  of  various  sizes  by 
which  the  phage  has  been  adsorbed,  and  that  the  active  agent  represents  a 
smaller  molecule  (Bronfenbrenner).  Both  the  viruses  and  the  phages  are 
specific  in  their  action  as  far  as  the  character  of  the  substratum  is  concerned. 
Thus,  bacteriophages  act  primarily  only  on  the  bacteria  in  which  they  origi- 
nated, or  on  nearly  related  microorganisms.  The  phages  derived  from  dif- 
ferent bacteria  can  also  be  distinguished  by  immunological  methods.  To  a 
certain  extent,  an  adaptation  of  bacteriophages  to  new  hosts  may  take  place. 
Likewise,  bacteria  and  yeasts  may  produce  new  enzymes  in  response  to 
altered  substratum  (Euler,  Dubos)  on  which  they  are  cultivated. 

In  passing  from  cell  protoplasm  to  enzymes  and  viruses,  we  compare  the 
most  complex  substances  with  other  substances  which  are  less  complex  and 
less  specific.  A  further  step  leads  to  the  hormones,  some  of  which  are  still 
proteins,  while  others  represent  relatively  simple  organic  substances.  In 
different  species  the  production  and  distribution  of  various  hormones  may 
be  different,  and  some  of  the  complex  hormones  seem  to  possess  a  certain 
degree  of  organismal-specificity  (insulin,  pituitary  hormones),  but  the  large 


578  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

majority  of  hormones  do  not  possess  a  species-specific  structure  and  the 
species-specificity  of  their  action  depends  on  the  species-specificity  of  the 
substratum  on  which  they  act.  Vitamins  are  not  of  a  protein  nature,  but  they 
may  combine  with  proteins  to  form  enzymes.  While,  therefore,  neither 
vitamins  nor  the  majority  of  hormones  possess  organismal  differentials,  still 
there  may  be  differences  in  the  production  of  these  substances  in  different 
species,  and  these  differences  are  analogous  to  differences  in  the  structure  of 
organs  and  tissues  and  in  the  constitution  of  certain  substances  which  occur 
in  these  organs  and  which  are  characteristic  also  of  these  species,  without  a 
relation  to  the  phylogenetic  position  of  the  species  being  manifest. 

To  return  to  the  starting  point  of  this  discussion :  if  an  immune  serum  is 
produced  against  a  conjugated  protein,  the  immune  substance  in  the  serum 
may  combine  either  with  the  hapten  or  with  protein  acting  as  carrier.  In  order 
to  obtain  a  specific  interaction  of  the  antibody  with  the  hapten  alone,  or 
with  the  hapten  or  substituent  groups  when  conjugated  with  a  carrier 
differing  from  the  one  which  originally  was  a  part  of  the  antigen  giving 
rise  to  the  antibody,  it  is  necessary  for  the  antigen  to  contain  a  certain 
number  of  the  substituent  groups.  If  this  number  remains  below  the  threshold 
of  effectiveness,  it  is  solely  the  carrier  which  induces  the  antibody  production ; 
we  have  therefore  to  deal  here  with  quantitative  relations  (Haurowitz, 
Sarafran  and  Scherwin).  In  order  to  produce  agglutinins  for  erythrocytes 
to  which  certain  sidegroups  or  haptens  had  been  attached,  it  is  necessary 
for  parts  of  the  surface  of  these  to  be  free  of  these  attachments.  Then  the 
antibody  will  be  directed  also  against  the  erythrocytes  as  such  and  not  only 
against  the  hapten  (Pressman,  Campbell  and  Pauling).  This  condition  seems 
to  be  one  of  the  factors  which  determines  whether  antibodies  other  than  those 
directed  against  the  hapten  will  be  able  to  cause  the  agglutination  of  the 
erythrocytes.  But  also  the  hapten,  as  such,  may  bring  about  an  agglutination 
of  the  erythrocytes  if  each  one  of  the  molecules  of  this  substance  had  a 
chance  to  attach  to  itself  two  erythrocytes  during  the  process  of  centrifuga- 
tion.  As  to  the  manner  in  which  a  hapten  can  induce  the  production  of  a 
specific  antibody,  the  experiments  of  Pauling  and  Campbell  give  some  indica- 
tion; these  investigators  succeeded  in  transforming  in  vitro  bovine  gamma- 
globulin into  antibody  by  moderate  heating,  or  by  adding  an  amount  of  alkali 
to  the  medium  sufficient  to  start  the  process  of  denaturation;  they  hold  that 
the  denaturing  causes  the  globulin  chain  to  uncoil.  This  gives  the  hapten — a 
dye  or  pneumococcus  polysaccharide  of  type  III — a  chance  to  act  on  the  pro- 
tein, which  thus  assumes  a  configuration  most  stable  under  these  conditions, 
one  complementary  to  the  configuration  of  the  hapten.  A  subsequent  lowering 
of  the  temperature  of  the  solution  or  a  restoration  of  the  neutral  state  effects 
a  renaturation  process  in  the  protein,  which  then  represents  a  specific  antibody. 
On  the  other  hand  according  to  Erickson  and  Neurath  regeneration  of  de- 
natured antibody  protein  may  take  place  even  without  the  presence  of  the 
specific  antigen  and  they  suggest  that  the  difference  between  normal  globulin 
and  antibody  globulin  may  be  due  to  differences  in  the  aminoacid  composition 
of  these  proteins. 


THE  CHEMICAL  NATURE  OF  DIFFERENTIALS  579 

However,  important  and  suggestive  as  the  experiments  and  conclusions 
discussed  in  this  chapter  are,  they  do  not  solve  the  problem  as  to  the  nature 
of  the  organismal  differentials.  After  all,  it  is  most  probable  that  the  protein 
molecule  as  a  whole,  perhaps  with  the  addition  of  smaller  conjugated  groups, 
represents  these  differentials,  while  the  larger  haptens  are  characteristic  of 
organ  and  certain  other  differentials.  Also,  in  regard  to  the  part  of  the  cell 
where  the  organismal  differential  proteins  are  situated,  no  certainty  exists. 
Bensley  distinguishes  the  mobile  protein,  which  is  found  mainly  in  the  interior 
of  the  cell,  from  plasmosin,  a  viscous  material  extracted  with  10%  NaCl 
solution  and  rich  in  nucleoprotein,  and  from  particulate  components  of  the 
protoplasm,  which  are  submicroscopic,  contain  nucleoprotein  and  phospho- 
lipids and  are  identical  with  or  associated  with  certain  enzymes  and  viruses. 
They  are  in  certain  respects  similar  in  constitution  to  the  mitochondria,  but 
not  the  same  as  the  latter.  There  remain  some  more  solid  constituents  in  the 
form  of  membranes  and  threads.  It  is  very  likely  that  the  exoplasm  of  the 
cell,  which  presumably  is  rich  in  plasmosin,  plays  a  prominent  role  in  the 
reactions  against  strange  organismal  differentials,  and  this  substance  may 
also  contain,  or  constitute  organismal  differential  proteins ;  but  the  possibility 
cannot  be  excluded  that  other  cell  constituents  as  well  may  bear  these  differen- 
tials. The  following  recent  observations  of  Claude  suggest  that  also  the  par- 
ticulate components  of  the  protoplasm  may  be  self-perpetuating  and  this  in 
turn  suggests  that  they,  too,  possess  individuality  differentials. 

Claude  distinguishes  small  cell  particles  (cytoplasmic  granules  or  micro- 
somes) which  are  suspended  in  the  homogeneous  cytoplasmic  ground  sub- 
stance and  which  correspond  to  the  particulate  components  of  Bensley,  from 
mitochondria,  Golgibodies  and  especially  from  the  zymogen  or  secretory 
granules.  The  latter  contain  more  nitrogen  and  sulphur,  but  less  phosphorus 
than  the  microsomes,  but  both  are  composed  of  phospholipids  and  ribonucleo- 
proteins;  there  is  moreover  some  indication  that  the  secretory  granules  con- 
tain a  material  similar  to  the  microsomes  and  both  of  these  cell  constituents 
may  have  therefore  a  common  origin.  In  contrast  to  these  cytoplasmic  cell 
components  in  the  chromosomes,  which  are  the  most  important  constituents 
of  the  nuclei,  thymonucleic  acid  is  a  significant  part,  but  Claude  suggests 
that  both  these  types  of  nucleoprotein,  the  cytoplasmic  as  well  as  the  nuclear, 
may  have  the  ability  to  reproduce  their  constituents  by  autocatalysis. 

The  prominence  of  the  nucleoproteins  in  various  components  of  the  cell 
becomes  of  special  interest  if  we  consider  the  probability  that  some  viruses, 
including  agents  which  are  involved  in  the  production  of  tumors,  are  of  a 
nucleoprotein  nature. 


Chapter  10 

Is  It  Possible  by  Experimental  Means  to  Change 

Organismal  Differentials? 

Individuality  in  the  sense  in  which  this  term  is  used  in  our  daily  life 
is  considered  essentially  as  a  fixed  condition,  and  the  criteria  of  individ- 
uality most  commonly  used  are  certain  structural  and  functional  peculiari- 
ties of  those  parts  of  an  organism  which  are  readily  perceived  through  the 
sense  organs.  Yet,  this  mosaic  individuality  is  not  as  constant  as  it  might 
appear ;  to  some  extent,  the  parts  constituting  it  may  be  under  environmental 
control  and  therefore  modifiable.  However,  we  have  recognized  that  there  is 
hidden  beneath  these  criteria  something  representative  of  individuality  which 
under  ordinary  circumstances  is  constant,  namely,  the  organismal  differen- 
tials, and  the  individuality  differentials  in  particular.  But  we  have  also,  on 
various  occasions,  referred  to  experimental  findings  which  might  suggest  a 
certain  modifiability  of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  which  are,  there- 
fore, apparently  opposed  to  the  fixity  which  is  characteristic  of  this  type  of 
individuality.  Yet  an  analysis  of  these  data  showed  that  there  was  no  reason 
for  assuming  that  an  actual  change  in  the  organismal  differentials  had  taken 
place;  on  the  other  hand  modifications  in  the  reactions  against  organismal 
differentials  were  noted  in  many  instances. 

This  interpretation  accords  with  the  genetic  origin  of  the  organismal  dif- 
ferentials; they  are  determined  by  the  genes  of  the  fertilized  ovum  acting  in 
association  with  the  cytoplasm  of  the  growing  and  of  the  adult  tissues.  While 
the  type  of  the  organismal  differentials  produced  by  or  inherent  in  the 
tissues  of  a  certain  individual  or  species  is  constant,  except  if  germinal 
mutations  should  alter  the  genetic  constitution,  the  amount  of  these  differ- 
entials produced  might  vary  under  different  conditions.  Furthermore,  the 
sensitiveness  of  a  tissue  against  homoio-  or  heterotoxins  and  against  strange 
host  cells  might  undergo  some  modifications  under  various  conditions. 
Changes  in  the  growth  momentum  of  tissues,  or  specific  adaptations  of  a 
tissue  to  strange  substances  may  occur  and  changes  in  the  intensity  of 
reactions  against  strange  organismal  differentials  may  be  observed  under 
certain  conditions.  After  we  have  now  considered  all  the  principal  data 
concerning  the  interaction  of  blood  and  tissues  and  their  various  constituents, 
those  belonging  to  the  same  individual,  as  well  as  homoiogenous  and  heterog- 
enous ones,  it  might  be  of  interest,  to  consider  connectedly  the  main  observa- 
tions which  may  have  a  bearing  on  the  problem  of  the  modifiability  of  organis- 
mal differentials. 

1.  We  have  observed  that  after  homoiogenous  transplantation  of  cartilage 
of  guinea  pig  or  rat,  the  lymphocytic  reaction,  which  may  be  quite  pronounced 
in   the   first   three   weeks    following   transplantation,    instead   of   becoming 

580 


CAN  ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  BE  CHANGED?     581 

stronger  if  the  transplant  is  allowed  to  remain  in  the  host  for  several 
months,  as  a  rule  actually  becomes  weaker,  and  also  the  reaction  of  the 
connective  tissue  decreases  considerably  in  intensity  in  the  course  of  time. 
We  may  assume  that  this  decrease  is  due  either  to  changes  taking  place  in 
the  host,  which  becomes  accommodated  to  the  strange  individuality  differ- 
ential of  the  transplant  and  therefore  reacts  less  strongly  to  it,  or  to  similar 
changes  in  the  transplant,  which  ceases  to  produce  the  differential  with  full 
strength.  These  changes  would  therefore  be  of  an  adaptive  character,  or 
they  might  be  due  to  an  injury  to  the  transplant,  resulting  from  the  long- 
continued  action  of  a  strange  environment ;  however,  we  would  not,  under 
these  conditions,  have  to  deal  with  actual  alterations  of  the  organismal 
differentials,  but  merely  with  certain  modifications  of  their  manifestations. 

2.  A  much  further-reaching  change  in  the  nature  of  the  organismal 
differentials  has  been  assumed  by  Rhoda  Erdmann  and  Gassul  to  occur  if 
amphibian  skin,  in  a  first  period,  is  cultivated  for  some  time  in  vitro  and  then 
transplanted ;  they  believe  that  under  these  conditions  it  is  possible  to  alter 
the  individuality  as  well  as  the  species  differentials  of  the  transplant  and  to 
make  it  more  similar  to  that  of  the  host  and  thus  to  improve  the  chances  of 
successful  transplantation.  For  this  purpose  these  investigators  cultivated 
skin  for  a  considerable  length  of  time,  first  in  plasma  and  tissue  extract  of 
its  own  species,  then,  step  by  step,  they  changed  the  type  of  plasma  and 
extract,  until  it  approached  more  nearly  in  constitution  that  of  the  host 
organism ;  they  believed  that  by  this  procedure  they  had  succeeded  in  increas- 
ing the  compatibility  between  transplant  and  host,  and  moreover,  it  was 
found  that  the  greater  the  distance  in  relationship  between  host  and  trans- 
plant, the  longer  the  time  required  to  effect  the  transformation  of  organismal 
differentials  through  preliminary  growth  in  vitro ;  this  interval  could  there- 
fore serve  as  a  measure  of  the  nearness  or  distance  of  relationship  between 
host  and  transplant. 

In  the  first  experiment  of  this  kind  Rhoda  Erdmann  cultivated  embryonal 
skin  of  birds  in  vitro  for  from  ten  to  twelve  days  in  homoiogenous  plasma, 
and  after  transplantation  of  this  tissue  into  defects  in  the  skin  of  living 
homoiogenous  adult  hosts  it  was  observed  that  the  transplant  remained  alive 
longer  than  corresponding  tissue  that  had  not  been  explanted  previously. 
Moreover,  the  graft  no  longer  called  forth  as  strong  a  lymphocytic  and 
fibroblastic  reaction  as  does  ordinary  homoiotransplanted  avian  embryonal 
skin.  Rhoda  Edmann  concluded  that  the  individuality  differential  of  the 
embryonal  skin  had  been  changed  through  cultivation  in  vitro.  Mammalian 
tissue,  on  the  other  hand,  which  had  also  been  explanted  in  a  first  period, 
was  soon  absorbed  after  homoiotransplantation.  Gassul,  in  continuing  these 
experiments,  noted  that  if  skin  of  an  adult  frog,  which  in  tissue  culture  can 
remain  alive  for  as  long  as  six  weeks,  is  kept  for  several  weeks  in  vitro  in 
frog  plasma,  it  continues  to  live  after  subsequent  homoiotransplantation  into 
the  skin  of  another  frog  for  longer  than  thirty  days,  and  during  this  period 
behaves  like  an  autotransplant,  no  reaction  developing  around  it.  Conversely, 
if  a  piece  of  frog  skin  has  been  kept  for  some  time  in  vitro  in  foreign  serum 


582  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

or  plasma  and  is  then  homoiotransplanted  into  a  living  host,  it  is  cast  off 
after  two  to  five  days.  Gassul  assumed  that  cultivation  in  a  heterogenous 
medium  altered  the  tissue  in  such  a  way  that  it  assumed  a  heterogenous 
character.  As  far  as  homoiotransplantation  is  concerned,  he  concluded  that 
the  preceding  explantation  in  a  homoiogenous  medium  caused  an  enhance- 
ment of  the  individuality  of  the  transplanted  tissue.  However,  the  success 
of  the  homoiotransplantation  under  these  conditions  might  rather  be  inter- 
preted as  signifying  that  the  individuality  differential  of  the  transplant,  or, 
rather,  the  intensity  of  its  production,  has  been  weakened,  and  it  elicited 
therefore  a  weaker  reaction  on  the  part  of  the  host.  Furthermore,  Gassul's 
conclusions  are  based  on  a  very  small  number  of  experiments  in  which 
tissues  were  homoioiransplanted  and  only  some  of  these  successfully.  As  to 
the  action  of  heterogenous  plasma,  especially  that  of  warm-blooded  animals, 
on  tissues  kept  in  vitro,  this  procedure  seems  to  diminish  the  success  of  a 
subsequent  homoiotransplantation  by  causing  injury  of  the  tissues. 

Subsequently,  Rhoda  Erdmann  undertook  heterotransplantation  of  anuran 
skin  after  a  preceding  cultivation  in  vitro,  in  an  extensive  series  of  experi- 
ments. While,  according  to  the  author,  normal  adult  skin  of  urodeles  can  be 
readily  transplanted  to  other  urodele  species,  it  is  very  difficult  to  accomplish 
such  a  result  in  anuran  species.  The  first  of  these  experiments  concerned  the 
transplantation  of  skin  of  Rana  esculenta  to  Rana  temporaria,  and  vice  versa. 
Later,  pieces  of  skin  from  farther  distant  species  were  used  for  grafting, 
following  a  previous  cultivation  in  vitro.  By  means  of  this  procedure  an 
exchange  of  skin  between  different  families  was  made  to  succeed  to  some 
extent ;  thus,  skin  of  Buf o  and  Bombinator  could  be  transplanted  to  Rana 
esculenta,  which  proved  to  be  the  most  suitable  heterogenous  host.  Bufo  skin 
was  first  cultivated  in  a  mixture  of  Bufo  plasma  and  Bufo  spleen  extract, 
then  in  a  combination  of  Bufo  plasma  and  frog  extract,  and  at  last  in  a 
mixture  of  frog  plasma  and  frog  extract.  Skin  thus  prepared  and  afterwards 
transplanted  into  adult  Rana  esculenta  was  found  living  and  united  with  the 
skin  of  the  host  even  as  late  as  fifty  days,  and  not  only  the  transplanted 
epidermis  but  also  the  skin  glands  of  Bufo  survived  under  these  conditions. 
In  the  case  of  the  skin  of  Pelobates,  cultivation  in  vitro  for  a  period  of 
twenty-four  days  was  required  before  it  could  be  successfully  transplanted 
into  Rana  esculenta.  It  is  of  interest  that  in  some  experiments  of  hetero- 
transplantation into  farther  distant  hosts,  hemorrhage  killed  the  host,  owing 
apparently  to  toxic  effects  exerted  by  the  transplant. 

In  interpreting  these  results  we  have  to  consider  several  possibilities: 
(a)  In  vitro,  skin  undergoes  regenerative  growth.  It  is  conceivable  that 
transplantation  of  regenerating  skin  gives  better  results  than  transplantation 
of  ordinary  resting  skin  although  in  our  earlier  experiments  we  did  not 
observe  that  homoiotransplantation  of  regenerating  skin  in  the  guinea  pig 
differed  essentially  from  homoiotransplantation  of  normal  skin,  (b)  If  skin 
is  cultivated  in  vitro,  it  is  only  the  epidermis  that  is  active  and  grows,  while 
the  underlying  connective  tissue  remains  inactive  and  may  become  detached 
from  the  overlying  epithelium.  Thus  after  transplantation  of  this  tissue,  the 


CAN  ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  BE  CHANGED?     583 

strange  epidermis  is  in  more  direct  contact  with  the  host  tissues  and  is  better 
supplied  with  blood  by  the  underlying  capillaries ;  this  might  possibly  improve 
the  chances  of  survival,  (c)  There  is  another  possibility  which  has  been 
suggested  by  Bytinski-Salz.  Various  kinds  of  amphibian  skin  contain  glands 
which  secrete  poisonous  substances.  By  cultivating  the  skin  in  vitro,  the 
poisons  may  have  been  extracted  to  a  large  extent  previous  to  transplantation, 
or  perhaps  a  depression  in  the  gland  activity  and  a  corresponding  diminution 
in  the  production  of  the  toxic  substances  following  transplantation  may  have 
been  brought  about.  Still,  there  remains  the  possibility  that  cultivation  in 
vitro  may  have  induced  a  change  in  metabolism  of  the  skin,  which  enhanced 
its  transplantability.  This  change  may  have  been  either  of  a  non-specific  or 
of  a  specific  character,  dependent  upon  the  kind  of  plasma  in  which  the  skin 
had  previously  been  cultivated.  Similar  successful  experiments  with  human 
skin  have  more  recently  been  reported  by  Stone  and  others ;  other  surgeons, 
however,  did  not  notice  an  improvement  in  the  results  of  homoiotransplanta- 
tion  through  a  preceding  cultivation  of  the  tissue  jn  vitro. 

3.  More  recently,  experiments  have  been  made  by  Lumsden,  in  which  the 
temporary  growth  of  a  mouse  tumor  in  a  rat,  or  of  a  rat  tumor  in  a  mouse, 
changed  the  tolerance  of  tumor  tissues  in  vitro  to  the  corresponding  heterog- 
enous sera,  in  which  they  were  subsequently  immersed,  in  such  a  way  as  to 
suggest  that  by  the  growth  in  the  heterogenous  species  they  had  apparently 
lost  their  own  organismal  differentials  and  assumed  the  characteristics  of  the 
foreign  species.  Thus  a  mouse  tumor,  after  growing  in  a  rat,  had  become 
resistant  to  serum  from  a  rat  which  had  been  immunized  against  mouse 
tumor,  but  at  the  same  time  it  had  become  susceptible  to  the  serum  of  a 
mouse  immunized  against  rat  tissue.  However,  after  transplantation  of  such 
tumor  cells  into  rat  and  mouse,  they  grew  only  in  the  latter ;  they  still  be- 
haved therefore  as  mouse  cells  and  had  not  really  changed  their  organismal  dif- 
ferential. It  must  then  be  assumed  that  changes  of  a  secondary  nature  in  some 
unknown  manner  had  reversed  the  reactions  towards  immune  sera.  Of  a 
somewhat  similar  nature  are  the  experiments  of  Kimura,  in  which  also 
growth  in  vitro  seemed  to  induce  a  change  in  tissues,  but  in  this  instance 
the  change  became  manifest  even  in  the  living  organism.  However,  the 
experiments  of  Albert  Fischer  indicate  that  no  real  change  in  organismal 
differentials  occurs  in  tissues  growing  in  strange  media  in  tissue  culture. 

4.  The  growth  energy  of  tumors  undergoes  various  adaptations  in  the 
course  of  serial  transplantations.  As  a  rule,  it  increases  gradually  following 
the  first  few  transplantations,  until  finally  a  tumor  may  grow  successfully 
in  hosts  in  which  at  first  negative  results  had  been  obtained,  sometimes  even 
in  heterogenous  hosts.  It  has  been  made  very  probable  that  the  antigenic 
properties  of  cells  from  spontaneous  tumors  (Dmochowski)  and  of  leukemic 
cells  from  spontaneous  cases  (MacDowell)  may  change  within  certain  limits 
in  the  course  of  serial  transplantations,  and  that  they  may  thus  differ  in 
their  reactions,  in  certain  respects,  from  analogous  cells  which  had  not  been 
subjected  to  such  treatment. 

If  we  consider  all  these  experiments  together,  there  is  no  necessity  for 


584  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

assuming  that,  following  these  various  procedures,  a  transformation  took 
place  in  the  specific  structure  of  the  organismal  differentials,  but  there  is 
evidence  for  the  conclusion  that  the  transplantations  altered  the  cells  to  such 
an  extent  that  (1)  phenotypic  changes  occurred,  perhaps  of  a  cytoplasmic 
nature,  which  insured  a  greater  resistance  to  the  injurious  effects  of  certain 
hosts,  or  (2)  the  growth  energy  of  the  cells  was  increased,  or  (3)  the  pro- 
duction and  the  diffusion  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  grafts  were 
quantitatively  diminished,  or  (4)  the  transplants  were  modified  in  such  a 
way  that  their  reaction  towards  other  individuals  or  species  were  altered  by 
means  of  secondary  mechanisms  without  any  actual  change  taking  place  in 
the  character  of  their  organismal  differentials. 

5.  If  we  include  in  our  analysis  not  only  the  tissues  of  higher  organisms, 
but  also  primitive,  unicellular  organisms,  we  find  further  analogies  to  the 
above  mentioned  phenomena.  It  is  known  that  in  protozoa,  changes  in  the 
resistance  to  injurious  chemicals  as  well  as  to  high  temperatures  can  be 
produced,  and  that  these  may  be  transmitted  to  successive  generations ;  like- 
wise, apparently  spontaneous  variations  occur  in  these  organisms  and  extreme 
types  of  this  kind  can  be  selectively  propagated.  Especially  striking  are  the 
experiments  in  which  parasitic  protozoa,  such  as  trypanosomes,  were  made 
resistant  to  immune  sera,  to  drugs,  in  particular,  also  to  certain  dyes,  acting 
specifically  on  these  organisms.  These  adaptive  changes  can  be  observed  in 
vivo  as  well  as  in  vitro.  Likewise,  in  free-living  protozoa,  for  instance  in 
paramaecia,  new  biotypes  can  be  produced,  which  may  differ  structurally  as 
well  as  physiologically  from  the  original  type.  Effects  of  this  kind  are 
associated  with  chemical  changes  such  as  the  antigenic  constitution  in 
trypanosomes,  as  indicated  by  the  acquired  power  of  the  organism  to  trans- 
form a  poisonous  form  of  a  chemical  into  a  less  poisonous  one.  These  effects 
may  be  transmitted  by  heredity  to  many  asexual  generations;  but  they  seem 
to  be  lost  ultimately,  especially  under  conditions  of  sudden  changes  in  the 
genetic  constitution,  such  as  those  taking  place  at  the  time  of  conjugation  or 
endomixis.  Whether  these  persistent  modifications  (Dauermodifikationen  of 
Jollos)  are  due  to  true  gene  mutations  and  therefore  comparable  to  real 
changes  in  organismal  differentials,  or  whether  they  are  due  to  cytoplasmic 
alterations  from  which  a  return  to  the  old  equilibrium  would  take  place 
in  the  course  of  time  is  not  certain. 

There  is,  therefore,  in  all  these  changes  the  question  involved  as  to  their 
permanence  and  also  as  to  the  respective  role  of  cytoplasm  and  genes  in 
their  causation.  However  that  may  be  we  are  directly  concerned  with  such 
induced  modifications  or  mutations  only  in  so  far  as  they  affect  the  relations 
of  different  races  and  species  to  one  another. 

6.  In  this  connection  we  must  also  again  refer  to  the  experiments  of 
Reynolds,  who  succeeded  in  modifying  the  reactions  of  various  protozoan 
organisms  towards  each  other  by  adding  to  the  culture  media  in  which  they 
were  kept,  fluids  from  culture  media  in  which  other  organisms  of  the  same 
type  had  previously  multiplied.  In  this  way  he  could  change  the  behavior 
of  pseudopodia  belonging  to  different  individuals  and  thus  alter  a  reaction 


CAN  ORGANISM AL  DIFFERENTIALS  BE  CHANGED?     585 

which  apparently  depended  upon  the  individuality  or  species  differentials  of 
two  organisms. 

7.  Somewhat  comparable  changes  to  those  observed  in  protozoa  have  been 
induced  experimentally  in  various  kinds  of  bacteria,  and  especially  in 
pneumococci.  Through  serial  passages  through  animals  belonging  to  a 
susceptible  species  the  virulence  of  bacteria  can  be  raised.  Similar  changes 
have  been  noticed  in  the  case  of  viruses.  Thus  the  effects  of  the  virus  of 
poliomyelitis  on  mice  and  rats  can  be  greatly  increased  by  serial  transfers  to 
mice ;  but  at  the  same  time  the  virulence  has  become  greater  thereby  also  for 
guinea  pig  and  Rhesus  monkey  (Jungeblut  and  Sanders).  In  bacteria  many 
kinds  of  socalled  "dissociation"  have  been  observed  and  produced  experi- 
mentally; from  apparently  fixed  bacterial  forms,  bacteria  with  different 
characteristics  have  developed  and  these  new  types  have  remained  constant. 
Modifications  of  bacteria  have  also  been  produced  under  the  influence  of 
bacteriophage  or  related  substances.  Increase  in  virulence  for  one  host 
species  and  decrease  for  another  species  may  follow  serial  passage  of 
microorganisms  or  viruses  through  a  certain  species  of  animals.  In  the  case 
of  viruses,  this  has  followed  cultivation  on  the  chorio-allantois  of  chick 
embryos.  However,  these  modifications  in  the  effects  or  reactions  cannot 
strictly  be  attributed  to  changes  in  the  organismal  differentials  of  bacteria 
or  viruses. 

Dawson  observed,  in  1919,  that  when  bacterium  coli  was  cultivated 
through  many  generations  in  culture  media,  which  differed  from  the  usual  ones 
in  their  fat  and  protein  content,  definite  peculiarities  developed,  which  dis- 
tinguished the  strains  thus  produced  from  the  original  ones ;  especially  notice- 
able was  a  specific  change  in  the  character  of  the  antigens,  which  after  injection 
in  rabbits  called  forth  the  production  of  immune  agglutinins ;  accordingly,  the 
character  of  the  latter  was  also  changed.  More  specific  were  the  changes 
which  Burnet  produced  in  a  strain  of  B.  melitensis.  In  this  case,  it  was  the 
association  with  a  heat-agglutinable  paramelitensis  strain  which  transmitted 
to  the  melitensis  strain  characteristics  similar  to  those  of  the  paramelitensis 
and  modified  the  antigenic  character  of  the  B.  melitensis. 

But  the  most  striking  results  have  been  obtained  with  pneumococci. 
Pneumococci  were  formerly  classified  into  four  types,  which  differed,  above 
all,  in  the  character  of  the  complex  carbohydrates  contained  in  their  capsules. 
More  recently,  Group  IV  has  further  been  split  into  twenty-nine  additional 
types.  In  addition,  it  is  possible  to  distinguish  within  at  least  some  of  the 
different  types  between  smooth  (S)  and  rough  (R)  colonies.  The  bacteria 
from  smooth  colonies  possess  their  typical  capsules  and  behave  therefore  in 
a  characteristic  type-specific  way.  The  pneumococci  from  rough  colonies,  on 
the  other  hand,  have  lost  their  capsules,  and  with  them  their  type  specificity. 
Furthermore,  there  exist  within  the  cell-body  proper  of  the  pneumococci 
proteins  of  a  specific  character.  It  can  be  shown  that  type  specific  S  pneumo- 
cocci can  be  transformed  into  R  pneumococci  by  cultivating  them  in 
homologous  type-specific  immune  sera.  According  to  Griffith,  this  transforma- 
tion from  the  virulent  S  forms  into  the  avirulent  R  forms  may  take  place 


586  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

gradually,  so  that  intermediate  forms  develop,  which  are  able  to  produce  a 
trace  of  soluble  specific  toxin  and  cause  immunity  in  the  mouse.  Subsequently, 
it  was  found  by  Avery  and  Dawson  that  these  R  pneumococci  may  regain 
their  specific  properties  and  again  become  typical  S  forms  if  they  are  grown 
in  anti-R  serum,  that  is,  in  serum  of  a  rabbit  that  has  received  repeated 
injections  of  the  heated  R  organisms  and  has  developed  immune  bodies 
against  the  latter;  even  normal  hog  serum  may  act  similarly  to  anti-R 
rabbit  serum.  The  S  pneumococci  which  were  recovered  under  these  cir- 
cumstances were  always  of  the  same  type  as  those  from  which  the  R  forms 
were  originally  derived.  This  indicates  that  the  R  forms  with  which  one  had 
to  deal  in  these  experiments  had  retained  their  type  specificity,  although  they 
had  lost  their  capsules,  and  with  the  latter,  the  type-specific  carbohydrates. 
Thus,  a  type  I  pneumococcus  which  had  been  converted  into  the  non-virulent 
R  pneumococcus  again  became  a  fully  developed  type  I  pneumococcus  after 
reversion  to  the  original  S  form.  In  this  case,  therefore,  the  R  forms  still 
possessed,  potentially,  their  type  specificity,  which  under  these  conditions  was 
presumably  localized  in  the  central  bacterial  body. 

However,  the,  experiments  of  Griffith  and  Dawson  seem  to  indicate  that  a 
still  furthergoing  change,  one  of  type,  is  possible.  They  observed  that  if  a  few 
living  R  pneumococci  are  injected  subcutaneously  into  mice,  together  with 
very  large  numbers  of  killed  virulent  S  pneumococci  of  a  type  other  than 
that  from  which  the  R  forms  were  originally  derived,  there  may  be  cultivated 
in  many  instances  from  the  injected  mice  after  death,  pneumococci  of  the 
type  to  which  the  killed  S  organisms  belonged,  which  had  been  used  for 
injection. 

A  similar  change  can  be  produced  even  in  vitro.  Thus  when  very  small 
particles  of  R  pneumococci  cultures  were  added  to  suitable  culture  media 
containing  killed  S  pneumococci,  of  a  type  other  than  that  to  which  the  R 
cells  belonged,  S  forms  developed,  which  were  of  the  same  type  as  that  of  the 
killed  S  pneumococci.  This  result  is  obtained  with  special  readiness  if  a 
little  anti-R  serum  is  added  to  the  culture  media.  According  to  Alloway,  the 
same  effect  can  be  noted  when  instead  of  adding  killed  S  bacteria,  as  such, 
a  heated  cell-free  extract  of  the  S  bacteria  is  used.  We  have  here,  apparently, 
results  analogous  to  those  which  Reynolds  obtained  in  protozoa.  The  nature 
of  the  substance  in  the  extract,  which  stimulates  the  R  forms  to  synthesize  the 
particular  polysaccharides  involved,  has  not  yet  been  determined.  However, 
it  cannot  be  the  soluble  type-specific  carbohydrate  itself,  because  the  addition 
of  this  substance  in  a  purified  state  does  not  produce  such  a  transformation. 

Of  a  related  character  are  the  experiments  of  Veblen,  who  grew  micro- 
organisms such  as  streptococcus  viridans  and  bacillus  typhosus  for  several 
generations  in  dilute  horse  serum  and  then  was  able  to  demonstrate  agglutina- 
tion of  these  bacteria  by  an  anti-horse  precipitating  rabbit  serum  in  high 
dilution,  the  microorganisms  losing  at  the  same  time  their  ability  to  agglu- 
tinate on  addition  of  their  own  specific  agglutinating  sera.  In  this  case,  a 
radical  change  in  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  bacteria,  which  their 
agglutination  of  the  latter  by  horse  serum  suggests,  can  be  excluded ;  but  we 


CAN  ORGANISMAL  DIFFERENTIALS  BE  CHANGED?     587 

may  have,  perhaps,  to  deal  here  with  a  coating  of  the  outer  ectoplasmic  layer 
of  the  bacteria  with  the  serum,  which  would  confer  on  this  layer  the  character- 
istics of  the  foreign  serum. 

Also,  observations  of  Thomsen,  Friedenreich  and  Hallauer,  may  have  some 
bearing  on  this  problem.  Thomsen  (1927)  showed  that  it  is  possible  to 
change  human  erythrocytes,  irrespective  of  the  group  to  which  they  belong, 
in  such  a  way  that  they  can  be  agglutinated  by  human  serum,  even  if  the 
latter  does  not  have  a  definite  relation  to  the  blood  group  of  the  red  corpuscles 
used.  This  change  can  be  affected  by  exposing  the  erythrocytes  to  contact 
with  certain  bacterial  cultures  or  their  filtrates.  Thomsen  and  Friedenreich 
explained  this  effect  by  assuming  that  under  these  experimental  conditions  a 
new  specific  receptor  "T"  is  produced  in  the  erythrocytes.  In  the  normal  sera 
of  certain  dogs,  sheep,  hogs,  rabbits,  guinea  pigs,  and  also  of  certain  mice, 
there  may  be  found  a  T  agglutinin  acting  specifically  on  the  experimentally 
produced  agglutinable  substance.  The  T  agglutinin  is  distinct  from  the  normal 
group-specific  agglutinins,  anti-A  and  anti-B.  Hallauer,  with  the  aid  of 
immune  agglutinins  specific  for  this  agglutinable  substance,  was  able  to  prove 
that  a  T  receptor  had  actually  been  newly  formed  in  red  corpuscles  of  man, 
as  well  as  of  certain  other  animal  species,  which  had  been  exposed  to  such 
bacterial  filtrates.  The  corresponding  immune  agglutinins  could  be  absorbed 
by  such  erythrocytes,  and  there  is,  moreover,  some  indication  that  the  species 
differential  of  these  corpuscles  is  also  concerned  in  the  production  of  these 
immune  bodies,  the  antigen,  presumably  representing  a  combination  of  a 
special  agglutinable  factor  and  an  organismal  differential,  acting  as  carrier. 
As  usual,  the  carrier  must  be  of  a  heterogenous  nature,  in  respect  to  the  species 
which  is  being  immunized.  In  this  case,  therefore,  there  would  have  been  experi- 
mentally effected  a  change  of  a  character  which,  while  determined  by  nuclear 
genes,  affects  a  cell  no  longer  possessing  a  nucleus.  This  result  cannot  depend 
upon  a  somatic  mutation  of  a  gene,  but  it  must  be  due  to  the  alteration  of  a 
factor  localized  in  the  cytoplasm.  Inasmuch  as  red  blood  corpuscles  do  not 
multiply,  the  acquired  characteristic  in  this  instance  is  not  transmitted  to 
successive  generations  of  cells ;  however,  it  is  quite  conceivable  that  a  cyto- 
plasmic change,  acquired  by  cells  which  have  the  power  to  propagate,  might 
be  transmitted  to  many  successive  cell  generations. 

The  mechanisms,  to  which  may  be  attributed  these  experimental  changes 
produced  in  single  cells  and  in  tumor  tissue,  are  not  yet  understood,  and  the 
findings  here  reported  do  not  contradict  the  concept  that  organismal  differ- 
entials in  higher  organisms  depend  on  the  genetic  constitution  of  the  individ- 
ual and  find  expression  by  means  of  reactions  which  presumably  take  place 
in  cytoplasmic  structures.  Alterations  in  these  manifestations  are  therefore 
not  necessarily  caused  by  changes  in  genetic  factors  as  such,  but  by  modifica- 
tions which  environmental  conditions  produce  in  cells  and  tissues. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  cannot  be  excluded  at  present  that  certain  persistent 
modifications  produced  in  parasitic  or  also  in  free-living  protozoa  may  be  due 
to  genetic  changes  caused  by  adaptative  alterations  which  were  induced  by 
environmental  conditions.  The  fact  that  they  are  liable  to  be  lost  particularly 


588  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

at  the  time  when  the  gene  sets  undergo  marked  changes,  suggest  the  pos- 
sibility that  gene  mutations  may  be  involved  in  these  processes.  However,  the 
strictly  adaptive  natures  of  such  modifications,  as  well  as  the  fact  that  after 
all  they  are,  as  a  rule,  not  permanent,  makes  it  more  probable  that  they  are  not 
due  to  genetic  changes ;  they  would  not  therefore  represent  changes  in  the  or- 
ganismal  differentials. 

From  all  these  observations  it  may  be  concluded  that  there  is  no  evidence 
that  in  higher  organisms  an  actual  change  in  the  constitution  of  the  organismal 
differentials  occurs ;  but  changes  may  take  place  in  the  quantity  of  differentials 
which  are  produced  and  in  the  character  of  the  reaction  against  these  differ- 
entials. On  the  other  hand,  in  certain  unicellular  organisms,  in  which  the 
criteria  used  for  the  definition  of  organismal  differentials  in  higher  organisms 
cannot  be  applied,  changes  have  been  observed,  which  in  certain  respects  may 
perhaps  correspond  to  modifications  of  the  organismal  differentials. 


P^rf    "VI  Organismal  Differentials,  Organ  Differentials 

and  Evolution 


The  students  of  evolution,  paleontologists,  systematists,  biochemists, 
and  also  geneticists,  have  used  the  various  tissues  and  organs,  their 
structure,  chemical  constitution,  their  functions,  as  well  as  certain 
peculiarities  of  the  whole  individual  as  subject  matter  for  their  investigations. 
They  also  studied  the  mutual  structural,  functional  and  chemical  adaptation  of 
the  organs  and  tissues  within  an  individaul  or  species,  as  well  as  their  adapta- 
tion to  the  milieu  in  which  this  individual  or  species  lived.  They  analyzed, 
therefore,  the  history  of  the  mosaic  characteristics  of  organisms  in  tracing 
the  evolution  of  species.  In  a  general  way,  it  may  be  stated  that  evolution 
has  led  to  a  gradual  increase  in  differentiation  and  specialization  of  tissues  and 
organs  and  to  a  more  and  more  intricate  interaction  of  the  organ  and  tissue 
constituents  of  the  organism.  On  the  other  hand,  the  study  of  transplantation 
of  tissues,  together  with  serological  investigations,  has  led  to  the  concept  of 
organismal  differentials,  which  concerns  the  differences  between  individual, 
species,  orders  and  classes  as  such,  and  indicates  their  relationships.  Organis- 
mal differentials  also  have  undergone  an  evolution,  which  likewise  has  resulted 
in  their  increasing  differentiation  and  specialization.  At  first  only  the  coarser 
differentials,  those  of  classes  and  orders,  can  be  recognized ;  the  mutual 
compatibility  between  different  organisms  and  their  parts  is  therefore  rela- 
tively greater  in  primitive  organisms.  Gradually,  a  refinement  took  place  in 
these  organismal  differentials;  they  became  more  individualized,  until  in  the 
end  the  stage  was  reached  in  which  the  individuality  differentials  determine 
and  regulate  the  interaction  of  the  tissues  of  which  the  organism  is  consti- 
tuted, and  in  which  each  organism  represents  an  autogenous  system ;  in  this 
condition  an  equilibrium  between  the  constituent  tissues  and  organs  of  an 
individual  exists  only  if  they  all  possess  the  same  individuality  differential, 
which  is  autogenous  within  each  individual.  Both  transplantation  of  tissues 
and  serology  have  led  to  this  conclusion.  However,  as  we  have  pointed  out  in 
the  preceding  chapters,  at  present  it  is  not  possible  to  deal  with  the  organismal 
differentials  as  chemically  isolated  substances ;  we  merely  study  the  reactions 
which  reveal  their  presence,  and  into  these  reactions  variables  may  enter, 
which  may  make  it  difficult  to  determine  whether  certain  constellations  are 
due  to  the  lack  of  certain  organismal  differentials  or  to  other  variable  factors 
which  prevent  these  differentials  from  becoming  manifest.  Still,  the  evidence 
on  hand  renders  at  least  very  probable  the  conclusion  that  the  lack  of  the  finer 
reactions  in  the  case  of  the  primitive  organisms  is  actually  due  to  the  lack  of 
the  finer  organismal  differentials,  and  that  it  is  due  largely  to  this  factor  that 
the  range  of  transplantability  is  wider  in  the  phylogenetically  more  primitive 

589 


590  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

classes  of  animals  than  in  the  higher  ones.  There  are  indications  that  an 
evolution  in  the  organismal  differentials  has  occurred  independently  of  each 
other  in  plants  as  well  as  in  animals. 

However,  while  in  higher  animals  there  has  developed  concomitantly  with 
the  refinement  of  the  organismal  differentials  a  very  pronounced  integration 
of  the  various  organ  systems  into  one  connected,  finely  balanced  mechanism, 
in  plants  so  marked  a  degree  of  integration  has  not  taken  place.  The  individual 
parts  of  a  higher  plant  remain  much  more  independent  of  one  another  than 
the  parts  of  a  highly  differentiated  animal.  Inasmuch  as  in  the  case  of  animals 
a  certain  parallelism  exists  between  the  differentiation  of  organs  and  tissues 
and  their  integration  into  a  whole  organism,  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  differ- 
entiation and  specialization  of  the  organismal  differentials,  on  the  other,  the 
question  may  be  raised  whether,  correspondingly,  the  organismal  differentials 
are  less  finely  developed  in  plants  and  whether  the  latter  possess  individu- 
ality differentials.  The  readiness  with  which  grafting  between  two  organisms 
can  be  carried  out  in  plants  seems  to  indicate  that  individuality  differentials 
do  not  play  a  significant  role.  If  they  do  exist,  then  a  greater  resistance  of  the 
grafts  to  strange  organismal  differentials  or  a  less  strong  reaction  of  the 
host  against  the  transplant  covers  up  these  finer  differentials.  But,  there  is 
reason  for  assuming  that  in  the  course  of  evolution  not  only  the  mechanisms, 
which  make  possible  the  manifestations  of  the  finer  differentials,  undergo  a 
gradual  development,  but  also  that  the  substances,  which  serve  as  differentials, 
undergo  a  corresponding  evolution.  Thus,  Steinecke  found  that  antigens 
obtained  from  more  primitive  plants,  when  injected  into  rabbits  for  the  pro- 
duction of  precipitins,  are  less  differentiated  than  are  those  obtained  from 
higher  plants.  Accordingly,  large  group  reactions  predominate  in  algae;  like- 
wise, in  cryptogamous  plants  the  differences  in  the  constitution  of  the  proteins 
between  larger  groups  of  plants  are,  as  yet,  slight.  In  phanerogamous  plants 
on  the  other  hand,  the  specificity  in  the  character  of  the  proteins,  as  manifested 
in  the  precipitin  reactions,  is  greater.  It  may  therefore  be  concluded  that  in 
lower  organisms  in  plants,  we  have  to  deal  not  merely  with  less  finely 
developed  reactions  against  antigens  or  organismal  differentials  in  general, 
but  also  with  less  well  developed  and  differentiated  organismal  differentials 
and  antigens.  We  may  assume  that  the  same  conclusion  applies  to  animals 
and  that  here,  also,  there  is  a  parallelism  not  only  between  phylogenetic 
evolution  and  the  fineness  of  reactions  against  organisms,  but  also  between 
phylogenetic  evolution  and  the  development  of  organismal  differentials  and 
the  corresponding  antigens. 

As  to  the  chemical  substratum  in  which  the  changes  take  place,  which  paral- 
lel the  structural  and  functional  evolution,  there  is  justification  for  believing 
that  proteins,  either  as  such  or  in  combination  with  other  groups,  play  the  most 
prominent  role ;  and  it  may  furthermore  be  held  that  the  phylogenetic  evolution 
of  the  organismal  differentials  was  associated  with  an  increasing  complexity 
of  protein  substances.  However,  our  knowledge  as  to  such  evolutionary  changes 
in  the  proteins  is  as  yet  very  slight.  Kossel  has  shown  that  in  fishes  the  nuclei 
from  which  the  sperm  chromosomes  are  produced  consist  of  combinations  of 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  591 

protamines  or  histone-like  substances  with  nucleic  acid,  and  that  the  prota- 
mines and  histones  of  the  sperm  differ  in  different  species  of  fishes  as  regards 
the  nature  and  grouping  of  their  amino-acids.  But  there  is  apparently  no  direct 
parallelism  between  the  chemical  relationship  of  these  substances  in  different 
species  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  latter,  and  two  different  species 
of  Salmonidae  may  contain  identical  protamines.  Furthermore,  according  to 
A.  E.  Taylor,  Gay  and  Robertson,  and  Wells,  it  is  not  possible  to  produce 
species-specific  immune  bodies  against  protamines  and  histones.  But,  these 
simple  proteins  develop  perhaps  from  more  complex  nuclear  proteins  which 
may  be  present  in  the  cells  from  which  the  spermatozoa  are  derived,  or  else  these 
may  be  admixed  to  the  suspension  of  spermatozoic  substances  which  are  anti- 
genic and  bear  organismal  differentials.  Accordingly,  through  injection  of  fish 
sperm  into  rabbits,  Kodama  could  obtain  specific  immune  sera,  which  reacted 
with  the  spermatozoa  of  their  own  as  well  as  of  related  species,  but  not  with 
the  extract  of  fish  muscle,  and  which  were  therefore  organ-  or  tissue-specific ; 
yet  these  immune  sera  possessed  also  organismal  differentials  as  shown  by 
the  fact  that  they  reacted  in  a  graded  way  with  the  spermatozoa  of  different 
species  of  fishes,  in  accordance  with  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  these 
species.  We  must  then  assume  that  substances  other  than  protamines  act 
as  antigens  in  this  case.  In  the  sperm  of  mammals  we  find  instead  of  the  simple 
protamines  or  histone-nucleic  acid  combinations  in  fishes,  more  complex 
nucleo-proteins.  These  substances  may  serve  as  antigens,  which  call  forth 
immune  reactions  against  the  organ  as  well  as  against  the  organismal  differ- 
entials or  their  precursors  contained  in  the  sperm.  Also,  other  animal  proteins 
may  have  a  species-specific  character. 

Other  instances  are  known  in  which  differences  in  species  are  associated 
with  differences  in  the  structure  of  proteins,  although  these  data  do  not  con- 
tribute to  an  understanding  of  the  evolutionary  changes  which  have  taken 
place  in  the  proteins.  Thus,  the  constitution  of  globin  in  the  hemoglobin 
molecule  differs  in  different  species  in  regard  to  the  relative  amounts  of  amino- 
acid  nitrogen  present  and  the  proportion  between  lysin  and  histidin,  on  the 
one  hand,  and  arginin,  on  the  other  hand.  Osborne  and  Gortner  observed  a 
certain  parallelism  between  the  chemical  relationship  of  the  seed  proteins  in  the 
wheat  and  barley  groups  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  species  in 
which  they  occurred,  and  these  differences  in  chemical  relationship  cor- 
respond to  immunological  reactions  (Wells). 

As  to  the  chemical  constitution  of  individuality  differentials,  it  is  almost 
certain  that  here,  too,  proteins  are  involved.  The  individuality  differentials 
cannot  as  a  rule  be  detected  by  chemical  or  immunological  analysis  of  blood 
sera,  but  under  certain  conditions  they  have  been  detected  in  erythrocytes  by 
means  of  immunological  methods.  The  great  difficulty  in  the  chemical  analysis 
of  the  individuality  differentials  lies  in  the  fact  that  the  preparation  of  proteins 
of  cells  and  tissues  for  study  in  many  cases  causes  their  denaturation  and  this 
change  injures  the  individuality  differentials,  which  evidently  possess  very 
delicate  chemical  characteristics. 

Not  only  does  the  phylogenetic  evolution  tend  in  the  direction  from  coarser 


592  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  finer  differentials  and  towards  individualization,  but  a  parallel  evolution 
takes  place  also  during  the  ontogenetic  development.  Here,  also,  the  organs  and 
tissues  evolve  from  a  relatively  simple  substratum  and  this  process  is  accom- 
plished through  the  interaction  of  chromosomes  and  their  genes  with  preformed 
cytoplasmic  structures  with  the  aid  of  evocators  and  organizers. 

Likewise  during  embryonal  development,  the  organismal  differentials  under- 
go a  transition  from  less  individualized  precursors  to  more  individualized 
differentials.  The  processes  which  lead  to  this  ontogenetic  differentiation 
exhibit  certain  remarkable  similarities  to  those  noted  in  the  phylogenetic 
evolution,  or  expressed  differently,  the  embryonal  development  of  phylo- 
genetically  farther  advanced  organisms  resembles  and  repeats  the  embryonal 
development  of  phylogenetically  earlier  stages,  as  though  the  number  of 
mechanisms  which  living  matter  can  use  in  attaining  the  advanced  stages  of 
development  is  limited  and  determined  by  the  actual  stages  through  which 
the  phylogenetic  development  has  passed. 

In  the  same  way  in  which  organs  and  tissues  and  their  differentials,  as  well 
as  organismal  differentials,  develop  during  embryonal  processes,  so  also  during 
regeneration  of  some  of  the  more  primitive  organisms  certain  aspects  of  the 
phylogenetic  evolution  may  be  repeated,  although  to  a  still  more  restricted 
degree  than  during  ontogeny.  Regenerating  tissues  of  adult  urodele  amphibians 
behave  in  some  respects  like  embryonal  tissues.  Parallel  to  the  increase  in  the 
extent  of  organ  and  tissue  differentiation,  with  advancing  regeneration  there 
is  a  decrease  in  transplantability.  The  earlier,  less  differentiated  embryonal 
and  regenerating  tissues  are  still  more  plastic  and  adaptable  to  environmental 
factors  than  the  farther  advanced  stages,  in  which  the  organ  and  tissue 
differentials  are  more  fixed  and  in  which  there  is  a  greater  tendency  on  the 
part  of  organs  and  tissues  to  develop  by  means  of  self -differentiation.  In 
higher  organisms  the  ability  to  produce  new  organs  during  regeneration  is 
lost.  There  is  again,  therefore,  noticeable  here  a  relation  between  the  differ- 
entiation and  fixity  of  organs  and  tissue  differentials  and  the  increasing  refine- 
ment of  organismal  differentials,  both  of  these  processes  leading  to  a  greater 
immutability  and  fixity  of  the  organism  as  a  whole. 

However,  notwithstanding  these  similarities  there  is  one  very  significant 
difference  between  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  evolution.  The  former  starts 
with  a  primitive  substratum,  in  which  the  specialized  organs  and  tissues  and 
the  finer  organismal  differentials  of  the  higher  organisms  are  not  yet  pre- 
formed. Chromosomes  and  genes,  as  well  as  cytoplasm  of  the  primitive  organ- 
isms, differ  greatly  from  those  of  the  higher  ones  and  this  is  true  of  the  germ 
cells  as  well  as  of  the  cells  of  the  adult  tissues.  On  the  contrary,  in  the  fertilized 
ovum  of  a  higher  organism,  all  the  chromosomes  and  genes  and  the  precursors 
of  organ  (tissue)  differentials  and  of  organismal  differentials  are  present, 
and  these  precursors  of  organismal  differentials  differ  from  those  of  other 
individuals  and  species.  The  organs  and  tissues,  and  also  the  organismal 
differentials,  merely  mature  in  the  course  of  ontogenetic  development,  whereas 
they  are  newly  created  in  the  course  of  phylogenetic  evolution. 

Various  types  of  specificities  in  chemical  and  morphological  structure  and 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  593 

in  the  function  of  organisms  and  their  constituent  parts  may  be  distinguished. 
There  is  the  specificity  of  the  organismal  differentials,  and  in  particular  of 
the  individuality  differentials,  on  which  depends  the  autogenous  equilibrium 
of  a  higher  organism;  the  latter  determines  the  controlled  interaction  between 
adjoining  cells  and  tissues  and  makes  possible  the  integrity  of  the  organism, 
guarding  it  against  invasion  by  strange  organisms  or  their  parts.  The  mutual 
adaptation  of  tissues  and  also  the  specific  adaptation  between  the  bodyfluids 
and  the  cells  and  tissues  of  an  individual  depend  upon  this  specificity  of  the 
individuality  differentials.  Upon  such  a  specificity  depend  also  primarily  the 
reactions  to  strange  organismal  differentials,  which  serve  as  antigens  and  cause 
the  production  of  the  various  kinds  of  antibodies  as  a  means  of  defense  against 
the  intrusion  of  foreign  elements  into  the  individual  organization.  This  specific- 
ity of  the  organismal,  and  especially  of  the  individuality  differentials,  is  the 
basis  of  the  "essential  individuality." 

There  is,  secondly,  the  specificity  of  organs  and  tissues  that  interact  within 
the  individual  and  this  specificity  depends  upon  the  differences  in  the  chemical 
and  structural  constitution  of  the  parts  of  which  the  organism  is  composed. 
Various  organs  with  interlocking  functions  form  primary  organ  system,  in 
which  the  correlation  between  the  functions  of  individual  organs  may  be 
controlled  by  nervous  mechanisms  or  hormones,  or  both.  These  primary  organ 
systems  are  then  combined  into  larger  systems,  until  in  the  end  the  whole 
organism  acts  as  a  unit.  The  interaction  of  the  various  organs  within  the  same 
individual  is  so  perfect  that  it  seems  to  express  the  underlying  "wisdom  of  the 
body,"  as  Cannon  has  so  aptly  called  it.  The  totality  of  these  organs  and  organ 
systems,  together  with  other  structural  and  functional  peculiarities  of  the 
organism,  represent  the  "mosaic  individuality." 

The  organ  specificities  and  various  structural  and  functional  characteristics 
of  an  individual  or  species  have  developed  in  the  course  of  evolution  and  they 
exhibit  a  gradation  corresponding  in  a  general  way  to  the  phylogenetic  rela- 
tionships of  individuals  and  species.  It  is  possible  to  reconstruct,  to  a  certain 
extent,  phylogenetic  systems  by  means  of  these  organ  and  other  structural 
characteristics.  Certain  constituents  of  organs  or  tissues  may  therefore  exhibit, 
in  this  respect,  characteristics  similar  to  those  shown  in  the  typical  manner 
by  the  organismal  differentials,  from  which  they  differ,  however,  in  their 
chemical  structure  and  in  the  fact  that  they  are  restricted  to  a  single  organ  or 
part  of  the  body  and  are  not  inherent  in  all  the  constituent  parts  of  an 
organism,  as  are  the  typical  organismal  differentials.  They  may  be  designated 
as  secondary  or  accessory  organismal  differentials.  It  seems  that  various  organ 
differential  substances  may  detach  themselves  from  the  stem  of  the  organ- 
ismal differentials  at  different  stages  during  phylogenetic  as  well  as  during 
ontogenetic  development,  and  that  these  substances  may  undergo  an  evolution 
more  or  less  corresponding  to  the  systematic  relationships ;  but  still  this  differ- 
entiation in  other  respects  may  develop  independently  of  phylogenetic  rela- 
tionships. Indications  of  such  a  process  may  be  noted  in  certain  food  reserves, 
for  instance  those  of  the  yolk  of  the  egg  and  of  the  seeds  of  plants;  here 
there  is  a  development  of  substances  which  more  or  less  corresponds  with  the 


594  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  species,  but  which,  as  in  the  egg  yolk,  does 
not  take  a  course  quite  parallel  to  the  evolution  for  instance  of  the  serum 
proteins.  In  many  cases  it  is  not  possible  to  distinguish  between  these  accessory 
and  the  primary  organismal  differentials,  because  of  the  impossibility  of 
carrying  out  the  necessary  experimental  tests.  Also,  certain  products  of  organs, 
such  as  enzymes  and  hormones,  so  far  as  the  latter  are  proteins,  may  possess 
organismal  differentials;  but  whether  these  differentials  are  of  the  first  or 
second  type  is  unknown. 

There  are  present  in  various  species  other  systems  of  differential  substances 
in  which  a  much  more  limited  parallelism  exists  between  the  chemical  nature 
of  these  substances  and  the  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  species.  This  is 
the  case,  for  instance,  in  some  groups  of  higher  organisms  in  which  the 
primary  blood-group  differentials  bear  specific  relations  to  certain  constituents 
of  the  blood  sera.  Blood  groups  of  the  same  kind  are  found  in  man  and  in 
certain  anthropoid  apes,  but  these  close  similarities  are  lacking  if  man  and 
less  nearly  related  species  are  compared.  A  still  more  limited  parallelism  is 
shown  between  phylogenetic  relationship  and  the  distribution  of  the  Forssman 
heterophile  differentials.  Such  partial  parallelisms  may  be  observed  also  be- 
tween the  evolution  of  organ  differentials  and  of  the  interactions  between 
certain  organs  on  the  one  hand,  and  phylogenetic  relationship  of  the  species 
on  the  other.  We  have  referred  already  to  the  observation  of  Sherwin,  that 
phenylacetic  acid  is  detoxified  in  more  primitive  organisms,  including  monkeys, 
by  conjugation  with  glycine,  leading  to  the  formation  of  phenaceturic  acid. 
In  human  beings,  it  combines  with  glutamine  and  is  eliminated  in  the  urine 
as  phenylacetyl  glutamine ;  and  according  to  Power  a  chimpanzee  behaved  like 
man.  Another  example  of  a  parallelism  between  the  nature  of  metabolic 
processes  and  phylogenetic  relationship  is  the  following :  creatinine  phosphoric 
acid  plays  an  important  role  in  muscular  contraction,  but  it  is  almost  ex- 
clusively found  in  vertebrate  muscle ;  in  invertebrate  muscle  its  place  is  taken 
by  arginine  phosphoric  acid.  However,  there  are  two  important  exceptions  to 
this  rule.  Creatinine  phosphoric  acid  is  also  found  in  the  muscles  of  some 
echinoderms  and  of  Balanoglossus.  The  latter  is  believed  to  represent  a  form 
transitional  between  invertebrates  and  vertebrates. 

The  distribution  of  urea  and  uric  acid  conforms  only  partly  to  phylogenetic 
relationship;  but  there  is  a  definite  connection  between  the  production  of  urea 
or  uric  acid  in  certain  classes  or  species  of  animals  and  the  distribution  of  the 
enzymes  arginase,  xanthine  oxidase,  urease,  allantoinase  and  allantoicase. 
Such  a  partial  relationship  applies  also  as  far  as  the  distribution  of  hemoglobin 
is  concerned.  It  occurs  in  the  erythrocytes  of  all  the  vertebrates  and  in  the 
plasma  of  annelids  and  molluscs.  In  the  corpuscles  of  annelids  there  occurs 
the  pigment  hemerythrin,  and  in  the  plasma  of  gastropods  and  cephalopod 
molluscs,  as  well  as  in  the  plasma  of  crustaceans  and  other  arthropods,  there 
occurs  hemocyanin.  From  such  systems  all  kinds  of  transitions  may  be  found 
to  an  entirely  random  distribution  of  substances,  without  regard  to  phylo- 
genetic relationship,  as  for  instance,  that  found  in  the  case  of  the  heterophile 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  595 

antigens,  with  the  exceptions  already  mentioned,  as  well  as  in  the  case  of  the 
melanin  pigments. 

There  are,  then,  morphological  and  metabolic  characteristics  of  tissues  and 
organs  which,  to  a  high  degree,  seem  to  be  correlated  with  the  gradation  and 
relationship  of  the  organismal  differentials;  but  these  characteristics  are 
limited  to  certain  organs  and  tissues  and  they  are  not  common  to  all  the 
tissues,  organs  and  organ  functions  of  an  organism.  There  are  other  structural 
and  metabolic  characteristics  of  tissues  and  organs  which  are  only  partly 
correlated  with  the  organismal  differentials  and  with  the  phylogenetic  develop- 
ment, and  still  others  are  only  slightly  or  not  at  all  correlated.  But,  it  is  only 
in  the  larger  groups,  such  as  classes,  orders,  genera,  that  the  morphological 
and  biochemical  evolution  of  certain  organ  and  tissue  systems  can  be  correlated 
with  the  course  of  the  phylogenetic  evolution  and  with  the  evolution  of 
organismal  differentials.  If  we  study  individual  organisms,  the  distribution  of 
organ  and  tissue  characteristics  is  independent  of  the  individuality  differen- 
tials. In  brothers  and  sisters  there  are  structural,  biochemical  differences  in  cer- 
tain organs  and  tissues,  as  well  as  psychical  differences,  which  do  not  parallel  the 
relations  of  their  individuality  differentials  ;  this  is  true  also  of  the  distribution 
of  the  original  blood  groups.  There  is  reason  for  the  conclusion  that  the  organ- 
ismal differentials  have  a  closer  and  much  more  direct  correspondence  to 
phylogenetic  relationship  than  the  organ  and  tissue  differentials. 

There  are,  in  addition,  certain  specific  functional  or  structural  relationships 
between  some  cells  and  tissues,  which  very  closely  correspond  to  the  relation- 
ships between  the  organisms  from  which  these  cells  and  tissues  are  derived, 
but  which  are  not  identical  with  the  primary,  typical  organismal  differentials. 
Thus  in  some  instances  there  exist  between  germ  cells,  spermatozoa  and  ova, 
or  between  germ  cells  and  certain  somatic  tissues,  specific  relations  which 
make  possible  the  distinction  between  autogenous  and  homoiogenous  relation- 
ship. Likewise  among  infusoria  there  are  mechanisms  which  enable  these 
organisms  to  distinguish  the  autogenous,  homoiogenous  or  heterogenous 
nature  of  parts  of  these  organisms.  We  have  in  this,  as  well  as  in  other  similar 
cases,  to  deal  with  processes  which  have  developed  not  in  the  direct  line  of 
phylogenetic  evolution  but  in  side  branches  and  which  are  peculiar  to  them ; 
in  particular,  in  unicellular  organisms,  it  is  not  certain  what  role  is  played 
by  genetic  factors  and  what  by  cytoplasmic  modifications  in  such  mechanisms. 
In  all  probability  many  other  mechanisms  of  a  similar  nature  exist,  which 
make  the  interactions  between  different  organisms  or  between  parts  of  them 
specific  for  species,  varieties  or  individuals.  In  different  cases  the  mode  of 
manifestation  of  these  specificities  may  vary,  and  likewise  the  mechanism  by 
means  of  which  the  mutual  adaption  of  cells  and  tissues  is  produced  may  vary. 

An  organism  consists,  then,  ultimately  of  systems  of  graded  substances, 
some  of  which  possess  a  very  great  organismal-specificity  while  others  are 
almost  exclusively  organ-specific,  and  still  others  show  combinations  of  organ- 
ismal and  organ  differentials,  varying  quantitatively  in  different  instances.  In 
addition,  there  occur  substances  which  are  specific  for  a  certain  species  or 


596  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individual,  but  show  no  direct  connection  with  organismal  differentials,  nor 
can  they  be  strictly  considered  as  organ  differentials,  an  instance  being  the 
four  original  blood  groups.  These  substance-specificities  are  paralleled  by 
structural  specificities.  The  full,  complex  interaction  of  such  specificities 
including  the  marked  organismal-specificity  in  the  relationships  between 
the  various  parts  of  an  organism  and  between  different  organisms  represents 
perhaps  the  most  characteristic  feature  of  organisms:  these  specificities  all 
increase  with  increasing  evolution.  To  such  specificities  of  substances  and 
structures  there  corresponds  a  specificity  of  the  reactions  which  take  place  be- 
tween the  different  constituent  parts  of  an  organism,  and  between  different 
organisms  or  parts  of  them.  These  specific  reactions  include  the  normal  cor- 
relations and  functional  reactions  between  different  tissues  and  organs  within 
the  individual  organism ;  they  include  furthermore,  the  reactions  of  immunity 
and  anaphylaxis.  On  such  specific  reactions  depend  also,  ultimately,  certain 
functional  correlations  between  the  organism  and  his  environment,  by  means 
of  which  the  environment  is  distinguished  from  the  individual's  own  organism 
and,  within  certain  limits,  is  reshaped  by  the  latter,  and  some  constituents 
of  the  environment  are  transformed  into  organismal  and  organ-specific  consti- 
tuents of  the  organism.  On  these  specific  reactions  are  contingent,  as  well, 
those  functions  which  make  possible  the  transmisson  of  specificities  to  new 
generations.  The  problem  of  evolution  consists  largely  in  the  analysis  of  the 
mode  of  development  of  these  specific  systems,  on  which  the  specific  reactions 
depend. 

It  is  due  to  the  combined  effects  of  the  individuality  differentials  and  the 
various  systems  of  organ  differentials  and  to  the  resulting  organ  functions, 
that  the  fullest  development  of  individuality  in  the  highest  organisms  takes 
place.  But  the  individuality  differentials,  and  the  organismal  differentials  in 
general,  as  well  as  the  chemical  and  morphological  structure  of  organs  and 
their  functions,  are  themselves  determined  primarily  by  genetic  factors.  As 
to  the  nature  of  these  genetic  factors,  these  differ  in  the  case  of  individuality 
and  organ  differentials.  The  various  characteristics  of  an  organ,  as  a  rule, 
are  determined  each  by  one  or  by  a  restricted  number  of  genetic  factors  which 
are  transmitted  in  accordance  with  the  laws  of  Mendelian  heredity,  although 
various  complications  may  arise  in  this  process.  This  predominating  effect  of 
a  single  gene  or  of  a  few  genes,  or  of  certain  changes  in  chromosomes  on  the 
ontogenetic  development  and  on  the  functions  of  organs  and  tissues  holds 
good,  although  during  the  various  stages  of  embryonal  life  and  also  during 
adult  life  the  cells  of  the  most  diverse  tissues  and  organs  contain,  as  far  as 
it  is  known  at  present,  complete  and  identical  gene  sets.  It  must  be  due  to  the 
interaction  of  the  gene  sets  with  a  variety  of  cytoplasmic  structures  that  the 
differentiation  of  tissues  and  organs  within  the  same  organism  can  take  place. 
On  the  other  hand,  there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  individuality  dif- 
ferentials depend  upon  a  very  large  number  of  genes  or,  perhaps,  on  the 
entire  gene  sets.  This  conclusion  rests  on  several  observations,  but  especially 
on  the  fact  that  while,  with  progressive  close  inbreeding  by  means  of  con- 
secutive brother-and-sister  matings,  the  similarity  of  these  differentials  in 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  597 

two  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  inbred  family  or  strain  can  be  gradu- 
ally increased,  it  is  very  difficult  to  achieve  complete  identity  as  it  exists  be- 
tween different  parts  of  the  same  organism.  This  identity  of  the  individuality 
differentials  of  different  tissues  and  organs  in  the  same  organism  can  be 
demonstrated,  notwithstanding  the  existence  of  great  differences  between 
different  tissues  and  organs. 

It  is  primarily  the  difference  in  individuality  differentials  of  the  individuals 
belonging  to  the  same  species  which  causes  the  reactions  of  the  host  against 
the  transplant,  the  local  as  well  as  the  distant  reactions,  and  which  also  may 
cause  immune  reactions  in  an  animal  after  introduction  of  tissue  or  its  con- 
stituent substances  or  of  bodyfluid  belonging  to  a  not  closely  related  in- 
dividual ;  parts  of  the  same  individual  do  not  elicit  either  a  contact  or  a  distance 
reaction  after  transplantation ;  nor  do  autogenous  substances  elicit  an  immune 
reaction,  except  perhaps  parts  of  the  body  which,  in  certain  respects,  are 
separated  from  and  strange  to  the  other  parts  of  the  organism,  and  in  par- 
ticular products  of  degeneration,  which  may  differ  in  constitution  from  the 
living  parts.  Organ  differentials  and  artificial  partial  antigens,  as  a  rule, 
function  as  full  antigens  only  in  combination  with  strange  individuality  or 
preferably  with  strange  species  and  order  differentials.  It  is  especially  the 
strange  organismal  differentials  which  interfere  with  the  integrated  function 
of  the  host  organism  into  which  they  are  introduced  and  which  make  it  possible 
for  the  host  to  react  also  against  specific  structures  other  than  organismal 
differentials. 

As  to  the  progressive  evolution  in  structure,  chemical  constitution  and 
function  of  tissues  and  organs,  and  in  the  constitution  of  the  whole  organism, 
it  is  assumed  by  geneticists,  and  also  by  some  other  students  of  evolution,  that 
this  is  caused  by  mutations,  alterations  in  chromosomes  and  genes,  in  associa- 
tion with  processes  of  segregation  and  selection.  If  the  conclusion  is  accepted 
that  mutations  are  the  primary  means  through  which  organisms  change  in 
the  course  of  evolution,  then  it  would  be  further  necessary  to  assume  that 
changes  in  organs,  caused  by  mutations,  will  affect  also  the  organismal  differ- 
entials in  the  course  of  time.  As  far  as  the  individuality  differentials  are  con- 
cerned, there  is  reason  for  believing  that  these  depend,  as  already  stated, 
upon  very  many  genes  and  it  may  therefore  be  assumed  that  a  change  in  a 
single  gene,  which  might  be  sufficient  to  induce  a  modification  in  the  struc- 
ture and  function  of  a  certain  organ  or  tissue,  would  not  alter  the  individuality 
differential  noticeably,  or  only  to  a  very  slight  degree ;  but  repeated  mutations 
might  produce  a  more  marked  effect  on  the  individuality  differential.  Such 
modifications  in  the  genetic  constitution  would  in  many  instances  affect  only 
superficial  mechanisms,  which  do  not  control  vital  processes  in  the  adult,  and 
they  would  affect,  first,  the  late  stages  in  embryonal  development.  Secondarily, 
however,  such  changes  might  influence  also  other  mechanisms  in  the  organism 
and  thus  alter  a  variety  of  characters.  As  to  mutations  which  result  in  slightly 
further-going  changes,  such  as  those  which  have  led  to  the  transformation  of 
gray  Norway  rats  to  "Mutant  Albino"  or  to  "Curly  Coat,"  which  were  ob- 
served by  H.  D.  King,  even  these  do  not  seem  to  change  the  organismal  dif- 


598  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ferentials  to  any  great  extent,  as  is  indicated  by  the  exchange  of  tissues 
between  these  races.  But  it  may  be  held  that  certain  gradations  exist  in  the 
relations  between  the  organismal  differentials  and  these  organ  mutations, 
which  are  superimposed  upon  numerous  genetic  differences  which  already 
exist  between  different  individuals,  families  and  strains.  However,  in  addition 
the  possibility  would  have  to  be  considered  that  changes  in  organismal  differ- 
entials depend  on  specific  mutations,  which  do  not  affect  one  single  organ  or 
tissue  but  certain  characteristics  common  to  all  organs  and  tissues. 

The  analysis  of  organismal  differentials  from  the  viewpoint  of  evolution 
is  bound  up  with  the  analysis  of  the  genetic  differences  between  races 
(strains),  subspecies,  species  and  genera,  and  of  the  mode  of  origin  of  these 
genetic  differences  and  of  speciation.  As  a  rule,  multiple  genetic  and  chromo- 
somal differences  distinguish  races,  subspecies,  species  and  genera.  These 
differences  are  caused  by  an  accumulation  of  mutations,  which  consist  either 
in  changes  taking  place  in  chromosomes  or  in  genes.  They  occur  in  a  popu- 
lation which  is  spread  out  over  a  certain  geographic  area.  Subsequent  proc- 
esses of  selection,  which  vary  in  character  in  different  environments,  seem 
to  lead  to  the  formation  of  geographic  races  and  species  and  may  explain  the 
adaptation  which  exists  between  these  groups  and  the  environment  in  which 
they  live;  at  least  quite  commonly  certain  environmental  characteristics  are 
associated  with  certain  structural  and  functional  characteristics  of  the  or- 
ganisms inhabiting  certain  areas  (F.  B.  Sumner),  and  these  associations 
between  environment  and  constitution  of  organisms  seem  to  develop  independ- 
ently in  various  places  and  in  different  races  or  species  belonging  to  the  same 
wider  unit.  Such  differences  between  races,  species  and  genera  are  greatly 
aided  by  lack  of  interbreeding  between  adjoining  populations  and  these  ob- 
stacles to  the  interbreeding  may  be  produced  by  a  variety  of  factors.  In  case 
they  are  due  to  structural  and  functional  differences  in  sex  organs,  such  dif- 
ferences are  of  no  greater  importance  in  the  distinction  between  species  than 
differences  in  other  organs  and  organ  systems ;  but  the  consequences  of  dif- 
ferences in  sex  organs  leading  to  sterility  between  adjoining  populations  are 
much  more  important  as  far  as  speciation  is  concerned.  There  remains  still 
the  problem  as  to  whether  the  adaptations  noted  between  environmental  con- 
ditions and  structural  and  functional  peculiarities  of  organisms  are  caused  by 
random  mutations  followed  by  selective  processes,  or  whether,  in  unknown 
ways,  certain  ecologic  conditions  exert  a  certain  influence  on  the  character  of 
mutations  which  take  place  in  these  environments. 

While  the  number  and  nature  of  structural  differences,  and  in  particular, 
also  the  interferences  with  interbreeding  between  races  (strains),  species  and 
genera  may  be  taken  as  indicators  of  the  degree  of  difference  between  the 
organismal  differentials  of  these  groups,  the  real  relationship  between  these 
organismal  differentials  can  be  determined  only  by  the  direct  tests  for  or- 
ganismal differentials  and  the  structure  of  the  latter  is  the  real  criterion  of 
the  nearness  or  distance  in  relationship  between  individuals  and  species.  As  to 
the  character  and  number  of  genes  which  differentiate  various  species  and 
whole  groups  of  species,  we  may  refer  to  the  investigations  of  Landsteiner  and 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  599 

Miller,  who  compared  the  occurrence  of  the  ordinary  human  agglutinogens  and 
of  M  and  N  agglutinogens  in  man,  the  anthropoid  apes,  as  well  as  in  Old  World 
monkeys  and  New  World  monkeys.  They  could  trace  in  this  way  the  develop- 
ment of  certain  genes  corresponding  to  these  agglutinogens  within  a  limited 
range  of  the  evolutionary  process.  Man  and  anthropoid  apes  are  most  closely 
related;  accordingly,  they  have  agglutinogens  A  or  B,  or  both  A  and  B,  in 
common.  The  distribution  of  A  and  B  differs  in  different  species,  but  it  also 
differs  in  different  human  individuals.  Factors  A  and  B  have  not  been  found 
among  Old  and  New  World  monkeys ;  but  among  certain  New  World  monkey 
species  and  among  Lemuridae  a  factor  may  occur,  which  is  related  to  but 
not  identical  with  human  B.  M  and  N  agglutinogens  occur  as  alleles  in  man, 
but  in  chimpanzee  a  combination  (MN)  has  been  found,  which  has  not  been 
observed  in  man.  Again  there  occurs  in  Gibbons  and  New  World  monkeys  a 
factor  similar  to  but  not  identical  with  the  human  M.  It  has  been  assumed 
that  progenitors  for  A  and  B  are  present  in  common  ancestors  of  these 
species  and  that  B  is  perhaps  the  older  factor. 

Irwin  tested  by  means  of  a  series  of  immune  sera,  the  number  of  genes 
which  were  common  to  various  species  of  pigeons.  In  comparing  two  of  these 
species  he  concluded  that  each  of  these  has  a  number  of  genes  which  the  other 
species  do  not  possess,  and  in  addition  there  is  a  set  of  genes  which  both 
species  have  in  common.  Accordingly  among  the  Old  World  species  of  pigeons 
there  are  sets  of  genes  which  are  characteristic  of  each  species,  and  other 
genes  are  shared  by  these  species.  The  same  applies  to  the  New  World  species 
of  pigeons,  and  a  third  set  of  genes  is  shared  by  Old  and  New  World 
pigeons.  These  conclusions  would  imply  that  the  gene  constitution  of  each 
class,  family,  genera,  species,  strain,  and  still  more,  of  each  individual,  is 
extremely  complex,  consisting  of  numerous  sets  of  genes  which  two  different 
groups  share  and  of  others  which  distinguish  them.  The  nearer  these  species 
or  groups  of  species  are  to  one  another,  the  greater  is  the  number  of  genes 
they  have  in  common,  and  the  further  distant  they  are,  the  smaller  is  the 
number  of  genes  which  are  identical.  These  conclusions  are  based  on  the  as- 
sumption that  each  agglutinogen  is  associated  with  or  determined  by  a  par- 
ticular gene ;  however,  there  is  the  possibility  that  each  agglutinogen  is  deter- 
mined by  more  than  one  gene.  Furthermore,  it  is  only  one  type  of  phenotypic 
characters  and  one  type  of  genes  which  have  been  considered  in  these  in- 
vestigations, namely,  those  which  determine  the  agglutination  of  erythrocytes 
by  specific  immune  sera.  But  there  are  innumerable  other  characters  which 
are  independent  of  the  agglutinogens  of  erythrocytes  and  if  the  gene-deter- 
miners of  these  characters  were  also  included,  the  complexity  in  the  genie 
constitution  of  tissues  would  become  still  much  greater. 

It  seems  plausible  that  mutations  causing  very  fargoing  changes  in  organs 
and  acting  on  earlier  embryonal  processes  may  modify  some  of  the  more 
basic  organismal  differentials,  which  developed  first  in  the  course  of  evolu- 
tion, while  mutations  affecting  the  constitution  of  organs,  which  were  more 
recently  acquired  and  which  are  of  a  less  fundamental  nature,  may  modify 
the  individuality  differentials.  In  general,  it  seems  that  the  more  similar  two 


600  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

organisms  are  to  each  other  in  their  structure  and  chemical  constitution,  the 
more  similar  as  a  rule  are  also  their  individuality  differentials,  and  that  to 
more  fundamental  differences  in  chemical  constitution  and  structure  corre- 
spond furthergoing  genetic  differences  in  the  organismal  differentials.  In 
the  course  of  phylogenetic  evolution  the  finer  organismal  differentials  devel- 
oped gradually;  at  least  they  became  manifest  only  in  the  course  of  advancing 
evolution.  Likewise,  as  evolution  progressed,  an  increasing  differentiation 
and  specialization  of  tissues  and  organs  took  place.  Comparable  processes  occur 
during  embryonal  development ;  but  here  the  organismal  differentials  develop 
from  precursor  substances,  the  complexity  of  which  increases  parallel  to  the 
increasing  complexity  of  the  organs  and  tissues  and  organismal  differentials 
in  the  higher  organisms. 

However,  during  ontogenetic  development  endstages  are  reached  in  which 
again  a  decline  sets  in  in  the  manifestation  of  the  more  specific  organismal 
differentials.  The  more  the  cellular  substance  proper  of  organs  and  tissues 
diminishes  and  the  more  the  paraplastic  and  intercellular  substances  predomi- 
nate, the  more  specific  is  the  organ  and  tissue  differentiation  and  the  less 
prominent  become  the  finer  organismal  differentials,  the  species  and  individu- 
ality differentials.  The  character  of  the  lens  of  the  eye,  and  presumably  also 
that  of  keratin  and  of  other  specialized  structures  which  no  longer  possess  the 
typical  cellular  constitution  of  the  tissues  from  which  they  originated  exem- 
plify this  change.  But  this  is  found  only  if  certain  serological  reactions  are 
used  as  tests  for  the  presence  of  organismal  and  organ  differentials ;  by 
means  of  contact  and  distant  effects  of  transplanted  tissues  it  is  still  possible 
to  demonstrate  the  presence  of  individuality  differentials  in  such  tissues, 
at  least  in  the  case  of  the  eye  lens.  It  is  therefore  probable  that  in  these 
paraplastic  tissues  the  individuality  differentials  have  not  been  entirely  lost, 
but  that  their  existence  cannot  be  demonstrated  by  the  less  sensitive  serological 
methods ;  this  may  be  due  to  the  fact  that  they  have  relatively  diminished  in 
quantity  perhaps  on  account  of  the  increasing  preponderance  of  the  organ 
differentials. 

Evolution  is  essentially  the  history  of  the  adaptations  between  organisms 
and  their  environment  and  between  constituent  parts  within  the  organism, 
the  non-adapted  organisms  being  eliminated.  But  there  has  been  an  evolution 
not  only  in  the  development  of  the  organisms,  their  tissues,  organs,  and  their 
organismal  differentials ;  there  has  been  an  evolution  also  in  those  processes 
which  lead  to  the  decline  of  these  organisms,  such  as  ageing,  tendency  to  dis- 
ease, and  death,  all  of  which  are  manifestations  of  the  lack  of  perfect  adapta- 
tion. Primitive  organisms  possess  great  plasticity  in  organ  formation  and 
they  possess  the  ability  to  restitute  the  whole  organism  under  the  influence 
of  internal  and  external  environmental  factors.  This  plasticity  is  associated 
with  a  lack  of  the  manifestation  of  finer  organismal  differentials  and  there- 
fore with  a  lack  of  individuality.  The  higher  organisms  constitute  much  more 
rigid,  fixed  wholes,  which  exhibit  very  fine  individuality  differentials.  In  the 
higher  organisms  the  organ  systems  have  become  more  complex  in  structure 
and  function,  and  in  their  interaction  with  other  organ  systems.  The  primitive 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  601 

organisms,  because  of  their  great  plasticity  and  ability  to  produce  organs  and 
to  restitute  whole  organisms,  are  potentially  immortal,  in  the  restricted  sense 
which  applies  to  beings  living  on  a  planet  and  in  a  universe  over  which  they 
have  no  control.  The  higher  organisms,  because  of  their  rigid  organization 
and  lack  of  plasticity,  because  of  their  greater  individualization,  have  lost 
the  power  to  restitute  the  whole  organism  and  to  be  potentially  immortal ;  at 
best,  only  small  constituent  parts  still  possess  such  power,  and  this  can  be 
realized  only  under  artificial  experimental  conditions.  Higher  organisms  are 
more  readily  discoordinated  and  disorganized.  The  delicate  mechanisms  of 
adjustment  to  one  another  which  their  organs  and  tissues  have  developed, 
no  longer  enable  them  to  repair  more  extensive  injuries  experienced  under 
the  influence  of  inner  and  outer  environmental  factors,  to  undergo  compensa- 
tory regulations  and  to  propagate  asexually.  They  have  acquired  senescence 
and  associated  diseases  in  the  attainment  of  individuality  and  one  of  the 
prices  they  paid  for  individuality  was  the  potentiality  to  immortal  life. 

But  while  there  is  a  parallelism  between  the  ascending  evolution  of  organis- 
mal  differentials,  the  specialization  of  organs  and  tissues,  the  increasing 
rigidity  of  the  organism,  and  the  apparent  inevitableness  of  senescence  and 
death,  it  is,  in  the  first  place,  the  increasing  complexity  in  the  structure,  con- 
stitution, and  metabolic  and  functional  interaction  of  tissues  and  organs  rather 
than  the  increasing  specialization  of  the  organismal  differentials  which  is 
responsible  for  these  pathological  consequences  of  ascending  evolution.  As  a 
result  of  the  greater  differentiation  of  the  organs  and  their  increasingly  intri- 
cate interaction  the  organs  became  more  delicate  and,  in  the  course  of  time, 
they  were  no  longer  quite  adequate  to  the  performance  of  their  functions, 
and  this  change  becomes  more  and  more  cumulative  with  the  advancing  years 
of  the  individual.  The  relative  proportion  of  reversible  cyclic  and  irreversible 
non-cyclic  processes  is  more  and  more  altered  to  the  advantage  of  the  non- 
cyclic  with  increasing  age  of  the  individual. 

Many  processes  in  nature  are  cyclic,  but  other  processes,  as  all  those  sub- 
ject to  the  second  law  of  thermodynamics,  are  nonreversible,  proceeding  only 
in  one  direction.  The  disintegration  of  radio-active  substances  is  non- 
reversible, although  under  altered  conditions  also  a  creation  of  the  latter 
may  occur.  In  organisms  the  essential  functions  must  be  cyclic;  this  is  the 
case  with  circulatory,  respiratory,  alimentary  functions,  with  sleep  and 
hibernation,  with  the  proliferation  of  certain  tissues.  The  sexual  processes  are 
also  at  least  partly  cyclic,  but  they  sustain  the  life  of  the  species  rather  than 
the  life  of  the  individual.  However,  these  cyclic  processes  are  grafted  on 
an  irreversible  process  of  a  non-cyclic  character,  on  one  continuous  process, 
starting  with  birth  and  leading  to  growth,  maturity,  old  age  and  death.  This 
process,  irreversible  as  far  as  the  individual  is  concerned,  is  the  basis  of 
cyclicity  in  the  species.  But,  also,  the  species  may  be  subject  to  non-cyclic 
changes  and  will  be  destroyed  in  the  end,  when  external  conditions  cause  at 
an  early  age  a  decline  in  the  organisms  and  make  propagation  impossible. 

We  may  then  regard  disease  and  death  as  manifestations  of  insufficient 
adaptation  between  the  different  constituents  of  an  organism  and  between  or- 


602  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ganism  and  environment.  The  process  of  gene  mutation  itself,  which  pre- 
sumably plays  so  important  a  role  in  evolution,  is  frequently  the  source  of 
maladjustments  and  therefore  many  mutations  are  lethal;  in  other  instances 
they  may  lead  to  malformations  and  abnormalities  in  metabolism  and  func- 
tion, or  they  provide  the  basis  on  which  certain  environmental  conditions  can 
act  in  an  injurious  way.  Pathological  mechanisms,  or  mechanisms  arising  in 
response  to  injurious  conditions  and  tending  to  counteract  them,  have  their 
phylogenetic  history  as  well  as  normal  mechanisms.  We  should  therefore 
be  able  to  trace  the  origin  and  evolution  of  disease  processes  phylogenetically 
in  the  same  way  as  the  evolution  of  normal  structures  and  functions ;  but  only 
the  beginnings  have  been  made  in  this  direction. 

Thus,  we  have  attempted  to  trace  the  development  of  thrombosis,  a  partial 
or  complete  occlusion  of  blood  vessels,  which  in  mammals  depends  upon 
changes  in  the  vessels,  in  the  character  of  the  blood  flow,  and  in  the  com- 
position of  the  blood.  From  the  primitive  process  of  agglutination  of  amoebo- 
cytes  in  Limulus  and  the  subsequent  combination  of  this  with  processes 
of  coagulation  of  blood  in  higher  invertebrates,  this  condition  ascends  through 
the  lower  vertebrates  to  its  full  complexity  in  mammals.  But  thrombosis, 
which  represents  a  disease  and  has  destructive  consequences  for  so  many 
higher  organisms,  is  closely  associated  with  processes  which,  instead  of  being 
injurious,  have  an  adaptive  value,  such  as  the  prevention  of  bleeding  follow- 
ing injury.  Furthermore,  it  is  of  interest  in  this  connection  that  the  mechanism 
leading  to  the  primitive  thrombus  formation  as  found  in  Limulus  has  much 
in  common  with  that  underlying  tissue  formation,  as  we  pointed  out  in  a 
preceding  chapter.  In  a  different  field  of  pathology,  Metchnikoff  has  shown 
that  it  is  possible  to  trace  phylogenetically  the  activity  of  phagocytes,  which 
play  so  important  a  role  in  inflammation  and  in  immunity,  from  simple  proc- 
esses of  digestion  in  primitive  organisms  to  the  most  complex  reactions  against 
injurious  material  in  mammals. 

In  a  provisional  way  we  may  distinguish  four  types  of  inadequacies  or  dis- 
eases which  are  however  not  sharply  separated  from  one  another  but  overlap  to 
a  certain  extent.  1)  The  ultimate  inadequacy,  which  becomes  manifest  in  the 
course  of  life  in  the  differentiated  and  the  rigid  organisms  belonging  to  the 
higher  classes  of  animals,  is  also  the  cause  of  the  imperfect  utilization  of  certain 
important  food  factors,  as  is  also  the  lack  of  tolerance  by  certain  organs  for 
food  factors  which  are  necessary  for  other  kinds  of  tissues  or  organs ;  thus, 
disharmonies  in  the  organism  set  in.  2)  Likewise,  inadequacies  in  the  relations 
between  the  individual  and  his  natural  or  social  environment  may  lead  to  such 
disharmonies  and  these,  too,  have  had  their  evolution.  3)  A  third  type  of  dis- 
harmony causes  a  disease  which  may  also  be  traced  phylogenetically;  it  con- 
sists in  changes  in  certain  tissues,  which  make  them  assume  a  cancerous  growth 
and  thus  invade  and  destroy  the  organism  in  which  they  originated.  Cancerous 
growth  has,  so  far,  been  observed  only  in  the  relatively  rigid  organ  and  tissue 
systems  of  the  vertebrates;  in  those  organisms,  in  which  restitutive  growth 
processes  lead  to  the  formation  of  organs,  to  multiplication  of  the  individual 
animals,  or  to  colony  formation,  excessive  growth  stimulation  should  not  cause 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  603 

the  development  of  cancer.  The  latter  represents,  then,  apparently  a  disturbance 
of  the  organ  and  tissue  equilibrium,  which  has  ensued  from  the  increasing 
differentiation  and  specialization  of  tissues  and  organs  and  from  the  increasing 
rigidity  in  the  constitution  of  the  whole  organism,  which  took  place  in  the 
course  of  evolution. 

4)  A  fourth  type  of  disease  is  due  to  the  struggle  between  complex  higher 
organisms  and  various  types  of  parasites,  especially  bacteria,  protozoa  and 
various  viruses.  In  this  case  the  reaction  of  the  host  against  the  invader  is  due 
in  part  to  the  effect  of  specific  toxic  substances,  which  injure  certain  tissues 
and  organs  of  the  host;  also,  the  direct  destructive  effect  of  parts  of  the  host 
by  parasites  may  play  a  role  in  this  disease  process.  But  there  are  viruses 
which,  instead  of  causing  a  primary  destruction,  may  induce  cancerous  growth 
processes  in  certain  hosts  and  in  certain  tissues  of  these  hosts.  Moreover, 
parasites  possess  organismal  differentials  which  differ  greatly  from  those  of 
the  host,  and  these  differences  may  disequilibrate  the  latter  and  thus  lead  to 
disease.  However,  the  organism  which,  as  the  result  of  inadequacies  in  its 
own  constitution  and  in  its  interaction  with  the  living  and  non-living  environ- 
ment, receives  injuries  and  becomes  diseased,  is  not  merely  a  passive  agent; 
it  also  responds  actively  to  the  injurious  factors,  and  these  reactions  may  be 
the  cause  of  new  diseases  superimposed  upon  the  primary  ones.  Local  re- 
actions of  the  host,  in  the  form  of  so-called  inflammatory  processes,  may  cause 
a  sclerosis  (cirrhosis)  of  certain  organs,  with  serious  consequences  for  the 
economy  of  the  organism  as  a  whole.  But  also  thrombosis,  and  even  cancer 
in  certain  respects,  may  be  considered  as  reactions  of  the  organism  against 
abnormal  conditions ;  furthermore,  immune  processes  directed  against  strange 
substances  are,  in  many  cases,  beneficial,  causing  the  death  of  the  invading 
parasite,  or  helping  to  destroy  strange  organismal  differentials  or  to  convert 
the  latter  into  the  differentials  of  the  host.  However,  in  other  cases  they 
may  be  destructive  for  the  host.  This  occurs  if  reactions  of  a  similar  nature 
to  the  immune  processes  lead  to  states  of  anaphylaxis  or  various  kinds  of 
allergy.  In  these  conditions,  organismal  differentials  may  also  play  a  part  and 
there  is  reason  for  assuming  that  the  sensitiveness  to  strange  organismal  dif- 
ferentials becomes  greater  with  furthergoing  differentiation  and  specializa- 
tion of  the  organismal  differentials;  likewise,  the  destruction  of  organs 
becomes  increasingly  serious  with  the  increasing  differentiation  of  organs  and 
their  increasing  inability  to  restitute  the  lost  parts  with  advancing  evolu- 
tion. Thus,  with  progressing  evolution  disease  processes  may  preponderate 
over  restitutive  processes,  although  both  go  hand  in  hand. 

The  relations  between  the  host  and  the  various  organisms  which  live  on 
or  in  the  host  may  be  that  of  symbiosis  or  parasitism.  As  to  the  role  which 
organismal  and  organ  differentials  play  in  these  relationships,  in  some  in- 
stances host  and  symbiont  or  parasite  may  belong  to  the  same  species,  and 
this  occurs  in  plants  as  well  as  in  animals ;  but  as  a  rule  they  belong  to  very 
distant  classes  and  usually  the  host  is  phylogenetically  a  much  higher  or- 
ganism than  the  parasite  or  symbiont.  Also,  the  degree  of  specificity  in  these 
relationships  varies  greatly  in  different  cases.  There  may  be  an  adaptation 


604  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

of  parasite  or  symbiont  to  one  particular  kind  of  host,  or  an  adaptation  to 
a  number  of  phylogenetically  related  hosts  or  to  very  diverse  hosts,  or  the 
two  latter  adaptations  may  exist  at  the  same  time.  Parasites  of  animal  or 
plant  origin  as  wellas  viruses  may  live  and  propagate  in  or  on  very  distant 
organisms ;  there  does  not  need  to  exist  an  exact  relationship  between  the 
organismal  differentials  of  host  and  parasite  corresponding  to  phylogenetic 
evolution. 

However,  under  certain  conditions  organismal  differentials  may  play  a 
certain  role  in  determining  the  invasion  of  the  hosts  by  the  strange  organisms. 
The  relationship  between  the  organismal  differentials  of  host  and  parasite 
or  symbiont  may  resemble  that  of  certain  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  or 
the  distribution  of  blood-group  or  Forssman  differentials  in  various  species. 
But  whatever  the  significance  of  organismal  differentials  in  these  relation- 
ships may  be,  parasites  and  symbionts  are  usually  adapted  to  definite  host 
species  and  often  also  to  definite  organs  or  tissues  within  a  certain  species. 
There  exists  therefore  a  marked  specificity  in  the  relations  between  host  and 
invader.  This  specificity  may  be  so  great  that  it  is  possible  to  distinguish 
between  different  strains  of  hosts  by  determining  the  kind  of  parasites  or 
symbionts  which  live  on  or  in  them,  and  conversely,  to  distinguish  between 
nearly  related  parasites  or  symbionts  by  determining  the  host  on  which  they 
are  found.  The  mutual  relationship  between  the  organismal  differentials  of 
host  and  parasite  may  be  one  of  the  factors  which  determine  the  interaction 
between  these  two  organisms;  this  interaction  does  not  depend  however  on 
the  organismal  differentials  of  either  host  or  parasite  alone.  In  this  respect 
the  relationship  between  host  and  parasite  resembles  that  between  host  and 
transplant,  which  depends  on  the  organismal  differentials  of  both  host  and 
graft. 

There  are  indications  that  the  specific  adaptation  between  host  and  parasite 
or  symbiont  may  be  due  partly,  at  least  in  some  cases,  to  the  presence  of  certain 
substances  in  these  two  organisms  which  are  specifically  adapted  to  each 
other.  Furthermore,  related  parasites  may  contain  related  antigens,  which 
may  call  forth  the  production  of  antibodies  showing  cross-reactions  with  the 
antigens  of  these  parasites.  A  very  instructive  observation  pointing  to  the 
presence  of  specifically  adapted  substances  in  host  and  parasite,  which  make 
possible  this  condition  of  parasitism,  has  been  made  by  Welsh,  who  found 
that  various  species  of  mites  which  live  between  the  gills  of  Anodonta  and 
other  mussels  are  positively  heliotropic  when  they  are  removed  from  their 
normal  habitat.  Addition  of  extract  of  the  gills  or  of  fluid  from  the  mantle 
cavity  of  the  species  on  which  they  live  makes  this  heliotropic  reaction  nega- 
tive, and  it  is  only  extract  or  fluid  from  the  species  to  which  they  are  adapted 
which  has  this  effect  and  not  substances  obtained  from  other  species  of 
mussels. 

As  mentioned,  there  is  noticeable  in  many  cases  also  a  distinct  organ-  or 
tissue-specific  adaptation  between  host  and  parasite  or  symbiont.  However, 
in  this  respect  also,  great  differences  exist  in  different  parasites;  some  are 
adapted  to  a  single  organ  or  tissue,  others  can  live  and  multiply  in  several  or  in 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  605 

the  large  majority  of  the  tissues.  This  organ-specificity  suggests  the  possi- 
bility that  a  definite  species  distribution  of  the  parasites  may  not  be  due  to 
the  specificity  of  the  organismal  differentials  of  the  hosts,  as  for  instance  in 
certain  cases  in  which  the  parasites  live  and  propagate  only  in  a  single  species 
or  in  a  very  few  species,  but  is  due  rather  to  peculiarities  which  organs  in 
different  species  possess.  The  term  organismal  differentials  would  therefore 
be  used  here  in  a  wider  sense. 

While  there  exists  in  the  relations  between  host  and  transplant  frequently 
an  organismal-  as  well  as  an  organ-specificity,  in  some  instances  the  organ- 
specificity,  in  others  the  organismal-specificity  may  predominate.  But  these 
specificities  are  not  always  rigidly  fixed;  they  may  be  modifiable  through 
serial  passages  of  the  parasite  in  a  host  species  other  than  the  one  to  which 
it  has  been  originally  adapted.  Gradually  a  change  may  take  place  in  the 
relative  virulence  of  the  parasite  for  various  host  species;  this  change  in 
species-specificity  can  be  obtained  also  by  means  of  many  passages  through 
the  chick  chorio-allantoic  membrane  or  the  chick  embryo,  and  not  only  the 
species-specificity  may  be  diminished  or  altered  by  this  procedure,  but  also 
the  organ-specificity  may  be  markedly  decreased.  These  effects  can  be  studied 
very  well  in  various  viruses.  There  is  therefore  noticeable,  here,  a  great 
similarity  between  the  behavior  of  certain  viruses  and  of  tumor  transplants ; 
the  latter  can  become  adapted  to  new  hosts  through  many  consecutive  passages 
in  different  hosts.  Moreover,  in  heterogenous  tumor  transplants,  a  good 
growth  has  been  observed  in  the  chorio-allantoic  membrane  of  the  chick;  the 
same  is  true  of  the  growth  of  heterogenous  normal  tissues.  In  both  viruses 
and  tumors  an  adaptation  to  a  new  host  occurs  in  the  course  of  long-continued 
transplantations  and  the  chick  embryo  and  chorio-allantoic  membrane  seem 
to  lack  the  power  to  injure  viruses  or  tissues  and  tumors  possessing  heterog- 
enous organismal  differentials.  It  remains  still  to  be  determined  how  far  these 
similarities  in  the  behavior  of  microorganisms  and  viruses,  on  the  one  hand, 
and  mammalian  as  well  as  avian  tissues  and  tumors,  on  the  other,  depend  on 
similar  mechanisms. 

The  evolution  of  the  organ  systems  and  that  of  the  organismal  differentials 
has  led  to  the  formation  of  very  complex,  rigidly  integrated  organisms,  in 
which  the  various  organs  and  tissues  are  highly  specialized.  These  processes 
have  also  resulted  in  an  increased  differentiation  between  organisms  belonging 
to  the  same  species  and  therefore  in  an  increased  individualization.  In  this 
individualization,  different  organ  systems  have  had  an  unequal  part.  The 
generative  system  is  less  important  for  the  individual  than  for  the  continuation 
of  the  species,  and  the  so-called  vegetative  organ  systems  are  essential  for 
the  life  and  function  of  the  individual,  but  are  not  individualized  to  the 
highest  degree.  It  is  the  nervous  system  in  its  interaction  with  the  other  organ 
systems,  and  especially  with  the  endocrine  organs,  whose  development  in  the 
course  of  evolution  has  made  possible  the  greatest  individualization.  Increasing 
differentiations  in  the  nervous  system,  in  its  cooperation  with  the  hormone 
system,  have  made  possible  the  coordination  and  correlation  of  the  functions 
of  the  various  organs  and  tissues  belonging  to  the  same  organ  system  and 


606  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  functions  of  various  organ  systems  with  one  another;  in  this  sense  the 
nervous  and  endocrine  systems  have  made  possible  the  integrated,  very  com- 
plex organisms  which  have  gradually  developed  in  the  course  of  evolution. 
But  in  addition,  the  nervous  system  has  developed  in  still  another  direction ; 
it  has  become  the  organ  system  which,  above  all  others,  controls  our  relations 
with  the  environment.  The  meaning  of  the  environment,  its  variety  and  its 
richness,  depends  for  each  species  and  for  each  individual  to  a  large  extent 
on  the  constitution  and  function  of  the  nervous  system.  While  the  vegetative 
organ  systems  make  possible  the  life  and  functioning  of  the  organism  in  a 
rather  simple  physico-chemical  environment,  the  nervous  system  has  become 
the  organ  which  by  way  of  the  sense  organs,  transmits  to  us  a  picture  of  the 
environment  and  which  represents  the  environment  within  us.  Furthermore, 
the  development  of  the  nervous  system  in  the  course  of  evolution  has  made 
possible  the  creation  of  the  most  individualized  type  of  environment,  the 
psychical  environment,  consisting  in  memories  and,  in  the  end,  in  the  pro- 
duction of  the  environment  in  thoughts  and  thought-emotion  complexes.  This 
psychical  environment  has  increased  in  richness  and  significance  with  advanc- 
ing phylogenetic  evolution,  but  it  has  reached  a  high  development  only  in  man. 
In  accordance  with  the  advance  in  differentiation  and  individualization  of 
the  human  organism,  his  relations  to  the  environment  have  also  become  more 
differentiated  and  individualized  and  thus  many  new  points  of  contact  have 
been  created  between  him  and  his  non-living  as  well  as  living  environment. 
These  contacts  have  affected  the  natural  struggle  for  health  and  life  with 
the  non-living  environment  and  with  other  less  highly  differentiated  organ- 
isms ;  they  have  affected  also  the  social  competitive  struggle  with  other  human 
beings  for  material  and  psychical  goods.  In  the  natural  struggle,  evolution 
has  led  to  the  building-up  of  the  physical-chemical  sciences,  of  technique 
and  industry ;  and  in  the  social  struggle,  notwithstanding  many  retrogressive 
movements,  there  has  been,  on  the  whole,  a  development  in  the  direction 
towards  a  greater  freedom  and  understanding  in  the  spheres  of  political, 
economical  and  social  relations  and  towards  an  increasing  valuation  of  the 
dignity  of  the  individual,  as  well  as  a  beginning  development  of  the  psychical- 
social  sciences. 

While  man  has  thus  lost  the  potentiality  to  immortal  life,  he  has  obtained 
a  greater  and  richer  individuality;  he  has  also  gained  a  life  of  abstract  thought 
that  may  help  to  shape  or,  if  he  so  desires,  to  replace  the  real  life  and  the 
universe,  and  he  has  won  a  certain  degree  of  consistency  and  continuity  in 
existence  through  the  persistence  of  thought  and  through  its  transmission 
to  successive  generations. 

'  Evolution  has  laid  the  basis  for  and  has  actually  led  to  changes  in  the 
significance  and  working  of  the  natural  struggle  and  natural  selection.  A 
certain  point  has  been  reached  in  evolution  where  it  has  become  possible  to 
replace  the  crude  and  brutal  struggle,  which  at  least  partly  controls  and 
dominates  the  fate  of  the  more  primitive  organisms,  by  a  civilization  which 
in  the  end  tends  to  become  universal ;  thus  development  has  taken  place  by 
way  of  intermediate  cultural  stages,  in  which  particularistic  interests  and 


DIFFERENTIALS  AND  EVOLUTION  607 

aims  functioned  instead  of  the  later,  more  universal  ones.  Ultimately  there 
tends  to  be  created  a  humanistic  mode  of  life,  which  can  develop  only  at  a  level 
of  evolution  reached  by  man.  At  this  level,  the  physical  as  well  as  the  psychical 
factors  of  life  attain  a  balance  in  which  the  wellbeing,  bodily  and  mental,  of 
the  individual  will  best  be  guarded. 

Thus  the  contradiction  between  our  concept  of  our  personality  and  what 
has  been  considered  as  the  ultimate  master  of  the  fate  of  species  and  individ- 
uals, namely,  the  natural  and  social  struggle,  will  be  diminished  as  far  as  the 
latter  are  in  conflict  with  the  physiological  needs  and  desires  of  the  individual, 
and  only  such  safeguards  will  be  established  in  this  process  as  will  make  possi- 
ble the  avoidance  of  retrogression  and  degeneration,  bodily  as  well  as  mental, 
in  human  society,  without  abandoning  the  principles  and  ideals  of  civilization 
and  their  practical  application  to  civilized  life.  In  man,  the  thought-life  pre- 
dominates and  the  realization  of  ideas  may  give  the  deepest  meaning  to  his 
existence ;  if  the  ideas  represent  true  abstractions  and  generalizations,  if  they 
are  in  harmony  with  science,  they  are  no  longer  concerned  solely  with  narrow 
circles  of  individuals,  but  with  all  humanity,  and  finally  they  may  comprise  the 
universe;  they  may  then  become  the  possession  of  mankind.  Thus  the  con- 
flict between  the  wishes  of  the  individual  and  his  fate  in  the  natural  and 
social  struggle  will,  in  the  end,  be  mitigated  and  the  struggle  for  the  survival 
of  the  fittest  will  be  replaced  by  the  knowledge  and  understanding  of  a 
civilized  society,  in  which  a  conscious  direction  of  further  evolution  may  take 
place. 

In  the  course  of  evolution  there  have  then  developed  organisms  in  which 
individuality  and  its  constancy  depend  upon  three  factors:  1)  the  structure, 
function  and  interrelations  of  organs  and  tissues;  2)  the  function  in  particular 
of  the  nervous  system  especially  that  on  which  memory  is  based  and  which  gives 
distinctiveness  and  continuity  to  the  highest  organism,  man;  and  3)  the 
action  of  organismal  and  individuality  differentials. 

As  to  the  first  factor,  organs  and  tissues  are  in  a  constant  flux  from  early 
embryonal  life  through  early  extrauterine,  to  adult  life  and  old  age ;  there  is 
a  greater  difference  between  the  structure  and  function  of  an  embryonal  tissue 
and  organ  and  the  corresponding  tissue  and  organ  in  the  same  individual 
during  old  age  than  between  the  organ  or  tissue  characteristics  of  two  different 
individuals  at  comparable  ages;  it  is  only  the  potentiality  of  organs  and 
tissues  to  undergo  a  certain  development  in  the  same  individual  which  is 
characteristic  of  the  individual  and  constant.  Regarding  the  significance  of 
memory  in  the  maintenance  of  individuality  in  the  psychical  sense,  the  effect 
of  the  latter  is  imperfect  and  limited  in  time ;  it  cannot  fully  function  as  the 
expression  of  individuality.  There  remains  the  third  factor,  the  action  of 
organismal  and  individuality  differentials,  which  is  completely  characteristic 
of  the  individual  and  which  maintains  its  identity  in  the  same  organism ;  this 
factor  then  represents  the  essential  individuality,  whereas  the  first  two  factors 
merely  support  this  essential  individuality;  each  of  these  factors  has  passed 
through  a  definite  evolution  which  we  have  correlated  with  the  evolution  of 
the  other  factors. 


Pjirt    \^TTT  ^e  Psyc^ca^Social  Individuality 


Chapter  I 

The  Physiological  Basis  of  the  Psychical- 
Social  Individuality 

IT  is  preeminently  the  phylogenetic  development  of  a  certain  organ 
complex,  the  nervous  system,  that  made  possible  the  phylogenetic  de- 
velopment of  individuality  in  the  psychical-social  sense.  An  individuality 
similar  to  that  of  the  higher  mammals,  and  in  particular  of  man,  does  not  yet 
exist  in  the  more  primitive  organisms.  In  some  of  the  earliest  forms  of  animal 
life  there  may  be  found  instead  of  single  individuals,  groups  of  individuals, 
colonies,  which  later  may  separate  into  single  organisms.  Gradually  within 
single  organisms  a  differentiation  of  the  component  parts  occurs  and  these 
differentiated  parts  become  more  and  more  integrated  and  coordinated  in 
such  a  way  that  a  complex  whole  results.  The  process  of  coordination  takes 
place  largely  through  the  nervous  system  in  conjunction  with  the  hormones,  but 
it  seems  that  the  nervous  system  itself  may  exert  at  least  many  of  its  functions 
by  means  of  specific  hormone-like  substances,  which  it  transmits  along  the 
nerve  paths.  As  a  rule,  however,  the  hormones  are  carried  to  distant  areas 
by  way  of  the  lymph  and  blood  channels  and  help  to  influence  and  correlate 
the  various  parts  of  the  organism.  In  this  process  of  coordination  there  are 
involved  reflexes  in  which  nerve  fibers,  ganglia  cells  and  hormones,  which 
circulate  in  the  bodyfluids,  may  cooperate.  In  a  wider  sense,  we  may  include 
among  the  hormones  also  certain  contact  substances,  which  are  given  off  by 
one  tissue  and  which  act  on  an  adjoining  tissue. 

Corresponding  to  the  increasing  integration  of  the  individual,  the  nervous 
system  becomes  more  complex.  This  system  is  lacking  in  protozoa  and  in 
sponges;  however,  in  certain  ciliate  protozoans  fibers  exist,  to  which  the 
function  of  conduction  of  stimuli  and  coordination  of  movements  have  been 
attributed.  Sponges  may  be  cut  into  many  small  particles  and  when  these  are 
joined  together  at  random  they  form  a  whole  new  organism.  The  definite 
beginnings  of  a  nervous  apparatus  consist  in  a  system  of  nerves  without  a 
central  set  of  ganglia.  The  primitive  nervous  system  of  the  simplest  inverte- 
brates is  not  yet  polarized.  The  simplest  type  of  a  central  nervous  system  is 
found  in  the  echinoderms ;  in  the  starfish,  for  instance,  there  is  a  circumoral 
nerve  ring  consisting  of  nerve  fibers  with  attached  scattered  ganglia  cells,  but 
as  yet  without  real  ganglia.  This  nerve  ring  functions  as  an  organ  which  co- 

609 


610  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

ordinates  the  movements  of  the  various  rays  of  the  starfish  (Romanes,  A.  R. 
Moore).  Next  there  arises  a  segmented  nervous  system,  in  which,  in  addition, 
there  forms  a  central  system  of  ganglia,  and  in  which  each  segment  of  the 
body  contains  collections  of  ganglia  cells  joined  by  nerve  fibers  running 
lengthwise  through  successive  segments.  This  is  a  step  towards  increasing 
integration.  The  segmented  plan,  on  which  the  nervous  system  is  built,  per- 
sists even  in  the  highest  organisms.  At  first  the  developing  central  ganglia  are 
of  relatively  little  importance,  because  the  different  parts  of  which  the  or- 
ganism is  composed  are  still  largely  independent  of  one  another. 

Under  favorable  conditions  certain  cells  and  tissues  retain  the  power  to 
live  independently,  even  in  the  highest  organisms,  but  the  ability  of  parts  of 
the  organism  to  lead  their  own  existence  and  to  restitute  the  whole  organism 
when  separated  from  the  rest,  diminishes  step  by  step ;  likewise,  the  power  to 
regenerate  organs  or  other  portions  of  the  animal  lessens  or  may  become 
entirely  lost.  Concurrently  with  this  development  and  with  the  increasing 
complexity  of  tissues  and  organs  and  their  greater  tendency  to  coordination, 
the  central  nervous  system  gains  in  importance  and  becomes  more  intricate. 
However,  it  is  not  until  the  latter  has  reached  a  certain  stage,  after  a  differen- 
tiation of  the  cortex  has  taken  place  in  the  forebrain,  that  thoughts  may  form 
on  the  basis  of  sense  impressions  and  that  the  ability  to  abstract  and  syn- 
thesize becomes  possible,  and  that  there  thus  develops  the  psychical-social 
individuality  in  its  most  complete  form.  The  cortex  arises  first  in  reptiles. 

The  phylogenetic  development  of  the  social-psychical  individuality  is  thus 
paralleled  by  the  evolution  of  the  nervous  system  with  its  increasing  com- 
plications, such  as  an  increase  in  differentiation  and  segregation  of  parts  of 
nerve  cells  and  fibers  in  localized  areas,  the  formation  of  certain  projection 
systems  connecting  the  peripheral  sensory  receptor  organs  with  subcortical 
ganglia  and  the  connections  of  the  latter  with  the  peripheral  effector  organs 
and  later  with  the  cerebral  cortex.  It  is  also  paralleled  by  the  development 
of  systems  of  association  fibers  within  the  cortex  of  the  brain,  the  forma- 
tion of  distinct  ganglia  within  the  more  or  less  diffuse  neuropil,  and  by  the 
stratification  and  individualization  of  the  cortex.  At  the  same  time  there 
seems  to  remain  everywhere  a  less  well  defined  neuropil,  consisting  of 
shorter  neurons  and  collateral  nerves;  it  infiltrates  the  other,  more  localized 
parts  diffusely  and  to  this  tissue  has  been  attributed,  by  Herrick,  the  integra- 
tive activities  of  a  lower  type,  as  for  instance,  the  maintenance  of  the  tonus 
in  more  primitive  organisms,  as  well  as  those  of  a  higher  type.  According  to 
this  view,  these  latter  processes  would  not  essentially  be  localized,  as  are 
certain  sensory  projection  nerve  fiber  systems,  the  motor  nerve  fiber  systems 
with  which  they  connect,  and,  although  less  obviously,  the  association  fiber 
systems.  Hand  in  hand  thus  with  the  differentiation  and  individualization  of 
certain  separate  mechanisms,  new  connecting,  centralizing  systems  develop. 
In  accordance  with  the  increasing  complexity  of  the  organization  in  general, 
the  number  of  the  primary  simple  reflexes  increases,  the  complexity  of  their 
interaction  likewise  increases,  and  they  then  extend  and  become  converted 
into  complex,  associated,  conditioned  reflex  systems.  The  effect  eventuating 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         611 

from  the  sensory  stimuli  received  from  the  environment  depends,  therefore, 
not  only  on  the  character  of  the  sense  organs,  but  also  on  the  central  nervous 
system. 

In  correspondence  with  this  evolution  of  the  nervous  system  there  seems 
to  take  place  also  an  increasing  complexity  in  the  production  and  action  of 
hormones.  The  number  of  hormones  which  have  so  far  been  demonstrated  in 
invertebrates  is  relatively  small  and  their  presence  has  been  noted  principally 
in  the  higher  types,  particularly  in  the  arthropods.  To  mention  some  of  the 
hormones  and  their  actions  which  have  been  studied  best :  The  experiments 
of  Roller  and  Perkins,  and  others,  have  shown  the  existence  of  a  hormone 
which  is  involved  in  the  movement  of  pigment  in  the  chromatophores  of 
crustaceans;  it  is  produced  in  the  eyestalk  in  the  sinus  gland.  Analogous 
hormones  may  affect  also  the  chromatophores  of  various  classes  of  verte- 
brates (G.  H.  Parker,  F.  B.  Sumner).  Kopec  and  others  found  that  in 
Lepidoptera  the  supraesophageal  ganglion  controls  pupation.  In  addition  in 
Hemiptera  and  Orthoptera  molting  and  pupation  are  induced  by  hormones 
originating  in  nervous  ganglia.  According  to  Wigglesworth  a  hormone  given 
off  by  the  corpus  allatum  inhibits  metamorphosis.  In  Drosophila  a  hormone 
responsible  for  pupation  is  given  off  by  the  larval  ring  gland  which  is 
situated  between  the  two  hemispheres  of  the  larval  brain  (Hadorn),  and 
Bodenstein  has  moreover  made  it  probable  that  this  gland  induces  also  the 
differentiation  of  organs  into  the  imaginal  state.  The  last  mentioned  effect  may 
however  be  an  indirect  one  and  as  in  the  case  of  other  hormones  already 
discussed,  the  changes  induced  by  the  ringgland  do  not  depend  solely  on 
the  nature  of  the  hormone,  but  on  a  balance  between  hormone  and  the  state 
of  the  recipient  tissue.  Various  other  hormones  probably  exist  in  inverte- 
brates ;  there  are  in  particular  indications  in  crustaceans  and  also  in  other 
invertebrates  that  hormones  may  affect  the  development  of  secondary  sex 
characteristics ;  furthermore  the  socalled  gene  hormones  might  be  mentioned 
in  this  connection.  As  in  the  case  of  vertebrates  so  also  in  invertebrates  no 
strict  species  specificity  of  hormones  seems  to  exist  and  there  are  even 
indications  that  invertebrate  hormones  may  perhaps  affect  vertebrate  organs 
and  conversely  certain  vertebrate  hormones  may  affect  invertebrate  tissues. 

The  relative  scarcity  of  the  hormones  so  far  discovered  in  invertebrates  as- 
well  as  their  distribution  in  different  classes  suggests  that  an  evolution  com- 
parable to  the  evolution  in  the  central  nervous  system  may  have  taken  place 
also  in  the  case  of  hormones;  this  would  be  in  accordance  with  the  simpler 
structure,  the  less  developed  differentiation,  integration  and  coordination,  the 
more  limited  organ  functions  in  these  more  rudimentary  animals  as  compared 
with  the  conditions  found  in  vertebrates.  However,  there  are  no  exact  data 
available  which  would  make  possible  at  the  present  time  a  definite  com- 
parison of  the  number  of  hormones  present  in  a  tissue  unit  in  vertebrates 
and  invertebrates,  and  it  will  be  a  task  for  future  research  to  trace  the 
phylogenetic  evolution  of  hormonal  regulations. 

In  addition  to  these  central  mechanisms  there  are  the  peripheral  receptors, 
the  sense  organs,  which  in  response  to  physico-chemical  factors  emanating 


612  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

from  the  environment,  whether  living  or  non-living,  determine  the  action  of 
animals.  As  a  rule,  these  sense  organs  also  undergo  an  increasing  differen- 
tiation with  phylogenetic  evolution,  although  some  of  them  may  be  developed 
to  a  higher  degree  in  more  primitive  organisms  than  in  man.  In  general,  the 
mechanistic  basis  of  primitive  animal  behavior  is  clearly  discernible,  but  with 
further  phylogenetic  advancement  and-  with  increasing  structural  and  func- 
tional complexities  new  and  more  complex  processes  arise,  which  may  render 
difficult  the  analysis  of  the  behavior  of  the  organism  as  a  whole. 

The  mechanistic  character  of  the  behavior  of  animals  was  recognized  by 
Jacques  Loeb,  and  it  was  with  particular  clearness  discernible  in  the  tropistic 
reactions  of  animals  as  highly  developed  as  certain  insects.  Especially  sug- 
gestive was  the  observation  of  this  investigator  that  slight  physico-chemical 
changes  in  the  environment  were  able  to  cause  a  reversion  in  the  direction  of 
the  tropistic  reaction. 

Simple  non-conditioned  reflexes  represent  the  functional  elements  which 
seem  to  underlie  animal  reactions.  However,  it  appears  that  ganglia  of  the 
central  nervous  system  give  off,  also  automatically,  stimuli  which  are  trans- 
mitted to  the  peripheral  nerves  and  to  the  recipient  end-organs.  This  would 
mean  that  a  specific  stimulation  by  afferent  nerves  of  the  reflex  arc  or  by 
hormones  is  not  required  for  the  function  of  these  ganglia,  but  that  they 
may  discharge  stimuli  under  the  influence  of  non-specific  substances  or 
mechanisms  which  reach  them.  Yet,  it  is  probable  that  the  important  func- 
tions of  the  central  nervous  system,  which  determine  the  behavior  of  higher 
organisms,  are  essentially  of  a  reflex  nature.  The  most  important  complica- 
tion which  next  arose  in  animal  behavior  consists  in  the  conditioned  reflexes 
discovered  by  Pavlov.  Even  at  a  very  early  phylogenetic  stage,  former  actions 
of  the  environment  may  modify  the  subsequent  behavior  by  means  of  condi- 
tioned reflexes.  Thus,  learning  is  made  possible.  But  the  importance  of  these 
processes  is,  on  the  whole,  limited  in  invertebrates,  although  they  seem  to  be 
widely  distributed.  Thus,  conditioned  reflexes  have  been  shown  to  exist  in 
polyclad  flatworms.  It  has  been  maintained  that  they  can  be  demonstrated 
also  in  protozoa ;  however,  A.  R.  Moore  has  pointed  out  that  in  the  latter 
one  may  have  to  deal  with  a  condition  analogous  to  the  hysteresis  of  metals 
and  colloids,  in  which  a  longer  lasting  after-effect  of  certain  treatments  can 
be  shown  to  exist,  comparable  to  certain  fatigue  phenomena  rather  than  to 
true  conditioned  reflexes.  The  latter  exist,  however,  in  larvae  of  lower 
vertebrates,  as,  for  instance,  in  Ambly stoma  (A.  R.  Moore).  Even  in  verte- 
brates they  bear  a  definite  relation  to  the  inherited  structural  and  reflex 
constitution  of  the  various  animals  and,  as  stated,  represent  an  addition  to 
these  latter.  The  more  varied  the  simple  reflex  activities  of  the  organisms  have 
become,  the  more  varied  may  be  the  conditioned  reflexes  which  are  added  to 
them. 

Therefore,  behavior  at  first  is  rigid  and  fixed,  corresponding  to  the  origi- 
nally relatively  simple  structure  of  the  organisms  and  especially  to  their 
nervous  system  and  sense  organs.  There  are  no  indications  that  individual 
differences  are  very  significant  in  the  behavior  in  the  more  primitive  animals. 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         613 

But  in  vertebrates  distinctions  between  individuals  may  be  recognized.  It  is 
especially  the  development  of  conditioned  reflexes  which  leads  to  the  differen- 
tiation between  individuals  of  the  same  species,  because  individual  distinctions 
of  a  finer  type  depend  upon  individual  experiences  of  a  special  kind,  and 
conditioned  reflexes  seem  to  play  only  a  very  small  part  in  primitive  organisms 
under  natural  conditions,  where  we  have  essentially  to  deal  with  "forced 
movements"  based  on  non-conditioned  reflexes. 

Even  in  the  apparently  most  highly  developed  invertebrates,  the  social 
insects,  bees  for  example,  rigid  reflexes  and  complex  reflex  systems,  instincts, 
determine  the  very  complex  modes  of  their  behavior.  While  environmental 
changes  may  have  a  slightly  modifying  influence,  in  general  these  animals  are 
guided  in  a  reflex  manner  by  scents,  colors,  and  certain  spatial  characteristics ; 
also  time  factors,  such  as  the  position  of  the  sun,  may  perhaps  affect  their 
activities.  While  this  interaction  of  some  environmental  factors  with  a  com- 
plex organization  may  lead  to  very  complicated  modes  of  behavior,  still,  the 
latter  remain  essentially  rigid  and  forced  and  are  largely  non-modifiable. 
However,  memories  seem  to  play  a  certain  part  in  the  behavior  of  these 
organisms,  and  further  complications,  in  addition  to  those  caused  by  condi- 
tioned reflexes,  are  introduced  by  the  changes  taking  place  at  some  periods  in 
the  life  of  the  individuals,  which  may  lead  to  changes  in  the  reaction  modes. 
Although  to  a  very  limited  extent  the  reactions  of  these  animals  have  become 
modifiable,  in  the  main  they  are  rigid  and  fixed.  It  is  the  complexity  of  these 
reactions  and  their  social  nature,  which  are  the  distinctive  features  in  the 
behavior  of  the  social  insects  and  which  raise  their  behavior  co  an  apparently 
very  high  level,  making  it  comparable  in  certain  respects  to  the  social  life 
of  higher  vertebrates. 

While,  as  we  have  seen,  there  are  no  indications  of  marked  individualiza- 
tion in  the  strict  meaning  of  this  term,  sharply  defined  group  differences 
exist  in  accordance  with  structural  and  functional  differentiations  within  cer- 
tain species  of  insects.  The  various  species  of  ants  differ  and  show  grada- 
tions in  regard  to  their  psychical-social  behavior  in  a  way  analogous  to  the 
differences  and  gradations  in  the  structure  and  function  of  various  organs,  and 
in  the  structure  of  the  body  as  a  whole.  In  general,  the  behavior  patterns, 
which  are  essentially  based  on  inherited  instincts,  are  similar  in  nearly  related 
insects  and  differ  in  further  distant  species ;  but  in  some  cases  nearly  related 
species  may  present  very  different  types  of  behavior,  and  relatively  distant 
species  may  show  similar  types  of  behavior;  for  example,  certain  bees  are 
non-social  in  their  behavior  pattern,  while  insects  as  distant  as  bees  and  ants 
may  have  in  common  very  complex  social  reaction  systems. 

Fishes,  representing  the  most  primitive  class  of  vertebrates,  recognize  to  a 
limited  degree  individuals  and  species.  There  are  species  differences  in  be- 
havior ;  on  the  whole,  behavior  patterns  are  similar  in  related,  and  quite  different 
in  more  distant  species.  Individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species  school  to- 
gether, joining  their  own  species  in  preference  to  a  strange  one ;  and  conversely, 
a  certain  school  receives  members  of  its  own  species  and  repels  members  of  a 
strange  species.  In  the  social  dominance  system,  in  which  there  are  individuals 


614  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

with  attributes  of  graded  superiority  or  inferiority,  these  gradations  serve 
to  distinguish  individuals.  Females  learn  to  recognize  their  former  mates; 
they  attack  strange  males  of  the  same  species,  but  do  not  react  against  their 
old  mates.  Parent  fish  learn  to  recognize  their  young.  There  are  very  distinct 
and  fixed  behavior  patterns  relating  to  the  sexual  life,  preceding  the  mating 
act;  also,  the  spawning  and  brooding  functions  are  rigid,  inherited  species 
characteristics.  Movements  which  have  the  effect  of  suggestions  and  lead 
to  imitations  of  movements  play  a  part  in  these  actions.  In  the  selection  of 
territories  and  nest  sites,  color  distinctions  are  involved ;  but  here,  also,  previ- 
ous experiences  of  having  lived  in  an  environment  with  certain  colors  may 
influence  the  choice  of  the  nesting  place. 

The  signs  which  serve  as  symbols  determining  recognition,  schooling,  sexual 
acceptance  or  attack  in  the  social  life  of  fishes,  are  partly  visual,  such  as  recog- 
nition of  movements  and  fine  distinctions  in  color  designs;  but  also  olfactory 
stimuli,  extracts  of  skin,  wounds,  substances  extracted  from  dead  fish  of  the 
same  species  call  forth  avoidance  reactions  in  Phoxinus.  The  essential  be- 
havior patterns  are  genetically  determined  species  characters ;  but  learning 
leads  to  certain  modifications  in  the  behavior  patterns.  If  a  certain  individual 
is  differentiated  from  other  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species,  this 
does  not  necessarily  mean  that  the  individual  recognition  in  fishes  has  the 
same  significance  as  in  man ;  although  the  same  term  is  used  in  both  instances, 
we  have  probably  to  deal  with  processes  of  a  different  nature.  In  fishes  the 
recognition  of  an  individual  signifies  the  sorting  out  of  a  fish  as  representing 
a  child,  a  former  mate,  or  a  certain  degree  in  the  dominance  series,  one  fish 
being  differentiated  from  others  probably  by  means  of  a  single  sign,  such  as 
a  color  pattern  of  the  head,  a  particular  movement,  or  perhaps  a  certain 
olfactory  stimulus  given  off  by  this  fish.  In  man,  on  the  other  hand,  an 
individual  represents  a  composite  of  many  different  bodily  signs  and  psychical 
expressions,  which  have  acted  on  another  individual  by  certain  movements, 
have  given  rise  to  certain  experiences  and  have  aroused  hopes  or  fears. 
However,  the  most  primitive  and  the  highest  vertebrates — fishes  and  man 
— give  evidence,  in  common,  that  the  distinction  of  individuals  and  species 
depends  directly  on  characteristics  of  organs  and  their  functions,  on  move- 
ments and  expressions,  and  not  on  the  organismal  differentials.  These  organs 
differ  in  structure  and  function  in  different  species  and  individuals,  and  the 
behavior  patterns  differ  accordingly ;  but  both  the  structure  and  functions  of 
organs  and  behavior  patterns  are  connected  and  correlated  with  the  organismal 
differentials. 

In  addition  to  the  reaction  modes  which  we  have  mentioned,  there  are  some 
further  indications  of  the  ability  of  the  fish  to  modify  the  rigid  behavior 
patterns  as  the  result  of  experience.  Frustration  or  perhaps  painful  sensations 
result  in  an  avoidance  of  certain  motor  activities,  which  would  have  been 
carried  out  under  normal  favorable  conditions.  But  there  is  no  suggestion 
that  reproductions  of  sensations  or  events  are  the  essential  factors  in  these 
learning  processes  or  are  the  necessary  cause  of  modifications  in  the  way 
of  reaction,  although  such  reproductions  may  perhaps  also  participate.  If  a 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         615 

female  fish  does  not  react  against  a  former  mate,  but  reacts  against  a  new 
mate,  this  may  merely  be  due  to  the  loss  of  a  stimulus,  owing  to  former 
experiences. 

The  mechanisms  underlying  the  very  complex,  strictly  determined  migrations 
of  eel  and  salmon  over  very  long  distances  at  definite  periods  of  life,  are 
unknown,  but  there  is  no  indication  that  higher  psychical  processes  are  in- 
volved other  than  those  functioning  also  under  other  conditions  of  life.  On 
the  whole,  the  reactions  of  fishes  under  given  circumstances  can  be  predicted 
by  the  student  of  fish  behavior,  except  in  instances  in  which  conditioned 
reflexes  have  formed  and  processes  of  learning  have  taken  place;  in  such 
cases  it  would  be  necessary  to  know  certain  phases  of  the  history  of  a  fish 
in  order  to  make  the  predictability  complete.  There  is  no  need  to  assume  the 
existence  of  free  will  in  the  psychical  life  of  fishes.  It  seems  that  the  greater 
part  of  their  behavior  is  determined  by  rigid  simple  reflexes  and  reflex  sys- 
tems, but  joined  to  these  are  modifiable  types  of  behavior  based  perhaps  on 
memories  of  sense  impressions  and  of  isolated  events,  and  these  may  be 
associated  with  simple  feelings. 

The  reactions  of  birds  represent  also  essentially  fixed  reflex  systems,  and, 
on  the  whole,  they  are  very  similar  to  those  observed  in  fishes,  although  the 
signs  used  by  birds  are  more  complicated,  insofar  as  in  addition  to  various 
visual  stimuli,  such  as  movements,  postures,  colors,  designs,  and  to  olfactory 
stimuli,  finely  differentiated  auditory  stimuli  enter  into  their  psychical  life. 
Sounds  given  off  by  individuals  begin  already  to  play  a  role  among  amphibia, 
but  they  become  much  more  varied  among  birds ;  there  are  specific  sounds 
given  off  by  mates  and  also  by  parents  and  children.  Among  the  birds,  too, 
are  found  species  distinctions,  sex  distinctions,  and  well  developed  sex 
symbolisms  used  in  the  sex  life  of  males  and  females.  There  is  also  a  seeking 
for  and  claiming  of  territory  in  which  to  live  and  to  breed,  and  the  individual 
which  is  the  first  to  claim  a  given  territory  has  the  advantage  over  those  that 
enter  later ;  the  former  tends  to  be  the  dominant  individual.  There  occur  group 
reactions  as  well  as  individual  distinctions,  and  a  definite  order  exists  regulat- 
ing dominance  in  a  group.  Furthermore,  there  are  migrations  to  great  dis- 
tances by  birds  as  well  as  by  fishes,  and  the  flight  reflex  plays  a  role  in  the 
life  of  both,  as  well  as  in  that  of  animals. 

Again,  both  fixed  inherited  mechanisms  and  a  certain  degree  of  modifi- 
ability  of  behavior  are  involved  in  determining  the  tendency  to  complex  sea- 
sonal migrations,  which  many  species  of  birds  exhibit.  In  some  species  this 
process  is  due  merely  to  definite  organ  functions  and  is  independent  of  ex- 
perience. However,  in  other  birds  only  some  component  parts  of  the  reaction 
system,  which  leads  to  seasonal  migrations,  depend  upon  fixed  reflex  systems, 
while  other  parts  of  it  appear  to  be  learned  from  older  birds.  In  the  latter 
case  we  have  to  deal  with  mechanisms  which  induce  a  bird  to  follow  other 
birds  in  their  movements ;  in  this  way  conditioned  reflexes  are  set  up  and 
the  animals  learn  how  to  move ;  thus  a  mechanism  of  tradition  may  develop. 
Furthermore,  we  may  find  individual  differences  in  the  intensity  of  the 
tendency  to  migration,  the  impulse  to  migrate  being  much  stronger  in  some 


616  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individuals  within  a  certain  species  than  in  others.  Age  and  sex  functions  may 
also  modify  the  strength  of  the  reaction,  which,  in  certain  species,  is  appar- 
ently much  more  developed  in  younger  than  in  older  birds.  It  seems  that  in 
migratory  birds  environmental  changes,  arising  from  seasonal  conditions,  set 
in  motion  a  reaction  system  which  expresses  itself  in  restlessness,  but  the 
mechanisms  underlying  these  migratory  tendencies  are  as  yet  only  imperfectly 
known. 

The  instincts,  as  well  as  the  kind  and  range  of  modifiability  of  behavior, 
are  inherited  characteristics,  and,  on  the  whole,  they  are  very  similar  in 
closely  related  species  and  more  dissimilar  the  more  distant  the  species  are; 
these  reactions  resemble,  in  this  respect,  the  organ  systems  and  outer  con- 
figurations, for  instance,  in  various  species  of  birds  which,  on  the  whole,  are 
similar  in  nearly  related  species  and  differ  in  more  distant  species.  However, 
there  may  be  differences  here  too  between  nearly  related  species ;  as,  for 
instance,  in  behavior  connected  with  courtship  and  parental  care  of  the 
young.  There  exists  among  birds,  also,  a  well  developed  group  life,  the  groups 
consisting  of  individuals  belonging  to  the  same  species,  and  members  of  one's 
own  group  are  distinguished  from  those  belonging  to  strange  groups.  The 
stimuli  which  hold  certain  groups  together  may  be  genetically  determined  in 
one  species  and  acquired  by  experience  in  another  species.  Voice,  posture  and 
movements  may  regulate  the  activities  in  a  certain  group.  There  are  indications 
that  even  conditions  comparable  to  what  may  be  called  suggestion  in  the 
human  species  play  a  part  in  the  group  life,  inasmuch  as  movements  of  one 
individual  are  quickly  transmitted  to  other  members  of  the  flock  and  elicit 
in  them  a  similar  behavior.  The  movements  and  attitudes  of  a  male  may 
initiate  corresponding  actions  in  the  female ;  in  this  case  sense  organs  trans- 
mit the  mode  of  reaction  and  induce  imitative  behavior  in  another  individual. 
Similar  effects  of  suggestions  have  been  noted  also  in  fishes. 

Also  in  other  respects  the  species  characteristics  of  behavior  are  to  a 
large  extent  genetically  fixed,  although  there  is  a  certain  range  of  modifi- 
ability in  accordance  with  experience.  Fixed  species  reactions  are,  for  instance, 
those  of  cowbirds,  which  return  to  their  own  species  even  if  they  have  been 
reared  by  foster  parents  belonging  to  different  species.  The  flocking  together 
of  birds  of  the  same  species,  another  fixed  mechanism,  depends  on  the  in- 
herited functions  of  organs  and  only  in  an  indirect  manner  on  the  identity  of 
the  organismal  differentials  of  the  individual  birds,  although  in  different 
species  of  birds  the  degree  of  specificity  in  the  tendency  to  gregariousness 
seems  to  vary.  The  European  and  African  stork,  for  instance,  flocks  each 
with  its  own  type  and  the  two  types  do  not  mingle  with  each  other;  but  in 
certain  other  species  such  a  strict  segregation  does  not  take  place,  members 
of  different  species  undertaking  common  flights. 

The  superiority-inferiority  relations  may  begin  very  early  in  the  life  of  birds 
among  nestlings.  These  reactions  depend  upon  inherited  reflex  systems,  but 
they  may  be  influenced  by  experience  gained  in  testing  other  individuals.  As 
stated  above,  a  stranger  in  a  certain  territory  tends  to  be  inferior  in  authority 
to  the  first-comer.  In  herons  the  male  must  have  established  superiority  over 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         617 

the  female  before  copulation  can  take  place.  Here,  the  parents  peck  only  the 
foreign  young,  while  they  recognize  and  respond  to  the  calls  of  their  own ; 
but  in  certain  other  species  parents  may  take  care  of  strange  young  as  well  as 
of  their  own.  The  aggressiveness  differs  greatly  among  different  species  of 
birds  and  the  aggressive  behavior  may  be  a  complex  called  forth  by  definite 
stimuli.  Thus  the  aggressive  behavior  of  the  falcon  is  not  due  to  a  general 
tendency  to  attack  other  birds;  but  these  reactions  take  place  only  when  a 
specific  stimulus  acts  on  a  falcon  and  releases  a  chain  of  reflexes.  Perhaps 
the  movement  of  another  bird  sets  in  motion  this  mechanism,  which  seems  to 
represent  an  inherited,  fixed  character. 

There  is  among  birds  individual  recognition  in  the  same  sense  as  among 
fishes ;  yet,  in  both  it  is  restricted  in  significance.  Individuals  are  recognized 
as  mates,  as  inferiors  or  superiors  in  the  order  of  dominance,  as  parent  or 
young,  as  members  of  a  flock,  but  not  as  individuals  in  the  strict  sense  of  the 
term.  Again,  it  is  a  single  and  relatively  simple  character,  such  as  color,  design 
of  certain  feathers,  or  sounds,  or  perhaps  combinations  of  a  few  of  such 
signs,  which  determines  recognition.  The  two  partners  composing  a  pair  of 
immature  herons  may  recognize  each  other  after  a  separation  lasting  as  long 
as  twenty  days ;  voice  and  feathering  serve  as  signs  in  this  process.  Artificial 
feathering  of  the  head  interferes  with  recognition.  Refeathering  the  head  and 
neck  of  both  members  of  a  pair  of  young  herons  does  not  prevent  the  recogni- 
tion of  a  partner  after  the  lapse  of  a  few  hours ;  if,  hower,  the  refeathered 
birds  have  been  separated  for  six  or  more  days,  they  no  longer  recognize  their 
partners  (Noble,  Warm,  and  Schmitt).  Recognition  of  individuals,  as  well  as 
of  members  of  the  same  group  and  species,  depends  therefore  in  birds,  as  in 
fishes,  on  mosaic  characteristics,  and  the  processes  involved,  as  such,  are 
fixed  by  inheritance,  as  is  also  the  range  in  which  they  are  modifiable  by 
experience. 

In  mammals  essentially  the  same  reflex  systems  and  instincts  are  active, 
which  determine  the  behavior  in  fishes  and  birds ;  these  make  possible  the 
distinction  between  their  own  and  strange  species,  groups  and  individuals ; 
they  play  a  role  in  the  intake  of  food,  in  the  sexual  life,  in  the  relations 
between  parents  and  offspring,  in  the  superiority-inferiority  relations  within 
groups,  and  in  the  fight  and  flight  reactions.  The  additions  to  the  behavior 
reactions  of  fishes  and  birds  which  are  noted  in  mammals  consist  in  a  greater 
modifiability  of  such  reactions.  Furthermore,  the  range  of  sense  organs, 
through  which  the  environment  acts,  is  enlarged;  by  way  of  olfactory,  visual 
and  auditory  stimuli  the  changes  which  affect  mammals  become,  on  the 
whole,  more  varied  and  often  much  more  delicate  than  those  perceived  by  the 
more  primitive  invertebrates.  Memories  of  things  and  events  help  to  influence 
the  behavior  of  mammals,  especially  of  those  belonging  to  the  more  differ- 
entiated species,  to  a  much  higher  degree  than  is  observed  in  lower  classes 
of  animals  and  the  actions  of  mammals. may  be  purposeful,  in  the  sense  that 
situations  are  sought  which  experience  has  shown  to  promise  satisfaction  of 
certain  instinctive  needs.  Among  these  desired  activities  is  the  act  of  playing, 
a  modified  reproduction  of  instinctive  activities ;  but  playing  is  indulged  in 


618  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

without  the  existence  of  situations  which  would  give  it  a  functional  sig- 
nificance in  the  natural  or  social  struggle.  This  type  of  behavior  is  sought 
for  its  own  sake,  for  the  satisfaction  which  the  instinctive  action  provides, 
dissociated  from  the  results  to  which  it  would  lead  if  used  in  the  struggle  of 
life.  Also,  the  modifiable  modes  of  behavior,  those  based  on  memories  or 
representing  conditioned  reflexes,  are  built  on  the  foundation  of  simple 
reflexes  and  instincts ;  they  are  an  elaboration  of  these  processes.  As  a 
result  of  this  extension  in  the  range  of  behavior,  the  environment,  as  far  as 
space,  time  and  the  relations  to  other  organisms  are  concerned,  has  become 
larger ;  the  differentiation  between  individuals  has  become  finer. 

However,  the  reflex  and  instinctive  basis  of  behavior  remains  and  the 
response  to  sense  impressions  on  this  primary  basis  takes  place  with  less 
delay  than  when  there  is  an  interference  by  the  restraining  effects  of  thought ; 
however,  memories  of  frustrations  and  pain  may  inhibit  reflex  and  instinc- 
tive actions  also  in  less  differentiated  mammals.  Complex  processes,  such  as 
the  building  of  a  nest  for  the  young,  which  in  more  primitive  animals  are 
purely  instinctive,  not  directed  by  modifiable  thinking,  are  largely  reflex 
actions  also  in  mammals.  Many  years  ago  the  writer  followed  with  interest 
the  nest-making  activities  of  mother  rats,  which  seemingly  indicated  the 
presence  of  intelligence  and  thought.  When  this  nest-making  instinct  is 
active,  the  mother  may  be  seen  running  around  in  the  cage  carrying  every 
little  article  that  can  be  used  for  nest-making  to  the  place  where  the  nest 
is  to  be.  But  if  the  observer  thgn  transfers  the  rat  from  the  netwire  cage  to  the 
outside  of  the  cage  and  allows  her  to  run  around  it,  the  instinct  to  gather 
material  for  the  nest  continues  to  be  active  and  she  now  pulls  things  away 
from  the  nest  as  soon  as  she  reaches  it  from  the  outside  of  the  cage,  just  as 
readily  as  she  formerly  had  carried  things  towards  the  nest.  Returned  to  the 
cage,  she  now  again  carries  back  to  the  nest  the  things  she  had  taken  away 
from  it.  No  reasoning  can  be  detected  in  these  actions. 

While  thus,  on  the  whole,  the  life  of  higher  mammals  is  still  rigid  and 
fixed,  nevertheless  the  plasticity  of  individual  and  social  activities  has  become 
greater  than  it  was  in  the  more  primitive  organisms.  Similarly,  the  activities 
of  dogs  are  not  essentially  creative,  in  the  sense  that  the  constituents  of  a 
composite  experience  would  first  be  taken  apart  and  then  synthesized  in  a 
new  fashion.  For  instance,  a  dog  looking  for  a  ball  which  has  been  thrown 
into  a  basket,  attempts,  in  accordance  with  inherited  reflexes,  to  recover  it 
by  scratching  the  basket  with  his  feet  and  pushing  it  along  with  his  nose, 
without  succeeding  in  obtaining  the  ball  by  these  means ;  he  does  not  discover 
the  simple  expedient  of  turning  the  basket  over,  and  if  the  basket  is  turned 
over  by  accident,  the  dog  does  not  readily  make  use  of  this  experience.  A 
higher  stage  has  been  reached  in  anthropoid  apes.  The  chimpanzee  is  able  to 
invent  new  modes  of  action,  to  compare  new  combinations  by  shifting  of 
mental  elements,  and  thus  to  accomplish  a  certain  end  by  means  which  are 
not  directly  of  an  instinctive  character.  In  this  manner  the  unpredictability  of 
behavior,  or  what  appears  as  freedom  of  action,  is  increased  ;  this  increase  how- 
ever, is  very  limited,  and  is  closely  related  to  the  unconditioned  reflexes  and 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         619 

instincts  which  are  active  in  these  animals.  There  is  no  indication  that 
analytic  thought  processes  occur  even  in  anthropoid  apes,  and  higher  types 
of  creative  work  are  apparently  outside  the  range  of  their  mental  capabilities. 
On  the  whole,  the  actions  of  mammals  are  fixed  even  from  a  quantitative 
point  of  view.  Thus  it  seems  that  the  distance  which  must  separate  a  circus 
trainer  and  a  wild  animal  in  order  to  avoid  reactions  of  flight  in  the  latter  is 
quite  definite.  A  student  of  animal  behavior,  who  knows  the  history  of  an 
individual  animal,  should  therefore  be  able  to  a  large  extent  to  predict  its 
attitudes  and  behavior  in  a  certain  constellation. 

Proceeding  now  from  the  other  higher  mammals  to  man,  very  pronounced 
complications  in  the  modes  of  reactions  are  observed.  Not  only  does  the 
environment,  which  acts  on  us  through  our  sense  organs,  induce  changes 
which  have  a  much  more  varied  and  also  more  lasting  effect  on  our  behavior 
than  in  other  mammals,  but  abstraction  and  synthesis,  in  which  the  elements 
in  the  environment  are  separated  and  then  re-arranged  in  new  combinations, 
become  very  prominent.  Thoughts  develop,  in  which  the  constituents  of  the 
environment  may  appear  in  combinations  different  from  those  in  which  they 
occur  under  natural  conditions;  through  shifting  of  these  constituents  new 
concepts  are  formed. 

In  man  we  have  to  deal  largely  with  secondary  mental  mechanisms,  condi- 
tioned thought  reflexes,  which  are  much  more  complex  than  the  simple 
reflexes.  Pictures  and  thoughts  enter  into  these  reflex  chains  which  ulti- 
mately end  in  tensions,  in  motor  activity  or  in  inhibitions.  Just  as  a  sound, 
light,  color  or  odor,  so  a  thought,  a  sentence,  or  other  symbols  for  more 
complex  experiences  in  general,  can  elicit  conditioned  reflexes.  A  further 
complication  arises  when  a  thought  calls  forth  other  thoughts,  thus  leading 
to  an  extension  of  thought  reflexes.  As  we  remember  experiences,  so,  too, 
we  remember  thoughts.  Moreover,  abstractions  and  syntheses  may  have 
their  first  origin  in  sense  impressions,  but  the  material  with  which  they  deal 
may  have  its  origin  also  in  our  own  thoughts  or  in  the  thoughts  of  others ; 
once  we  have  made  the  latter  our  own,  no  distinction  exists  between  the 
effects  of  the  thoughts  of  others  and  those  of  our  own  thoughts.  Thus 
thoughts  become  the  objects  of  abstraction  and  synthesis.  These  various 
trains  of  thought  make  connection  with  the  simpler  non-conditioned,  as  well 
as  with  the  conditioned  reflexes,  which  latter  are  established  much  more 
readily  and  in  much  greater  variety  in  man  than  in  other  mammals,  and  the 
resulting  various  combinations  form  very  finely  balanced  systems.  Our  atti- 
tudes and  actions  are  determined  by  these  systems  of  conditioned  and 
unconditioned  reflexes  in  combination  with  thoughts,  representing  primarily 
true  or  false  sense  impressions  and,  based  on  these,  reproductions  of  a  real 
or  imaginary  reality.  Or  thoughts  may  function  as  suggestions,  and  then  they 
are  transferred  into  actions  and  attitudes  and  the  content  of  the  thoughts  is 
converted  into  vivid  pictures  of  reality  which  rigidly  fix  actions  and  attitudes. 

Thoughts  are  especially  effective  in  their  function  as  suggestions  if  trans- 
mitted to  us  in  the  form  of  a  direct  or  implied  command ;  but  in  some  respects, 
in  every  thought  there  is  included  such  a  command.  On  the  other  hand, 


620  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

abstraction  and  synthesis,  resulting  from  our  dealings  with  the  environment 
as  well  as  with  thought  processes,  may  determine  our  actions  and  attitudes 
without  regard  or  even  in  opposition  to  their  suggestive  effect.  In  this  case 
our  thoughts  act  as  true  or  imaginary  representatives  of  reality.  On  the  basis 
of  our  experiences  gained  in  dealing  with  the  outer  environmental  world  or 
with  our  thoughts,  we  make  furthergoing  abstractions  concerning  the  char- 
acter of  abstractions  and  synthesis  in  general  and  their  relation  to  the 
environment.  Thus  logic  is  built  up.  The  purely  logical,  rational  use  of 
thoughts  as  determiners  of  our  actions  freed  from  the  elements  of  suggestion 
and  detached  from  their  function  as  instruments  in  the  natural  and  social 
struggle,  represents  the  highest  type  of  human  activity  and  the  closest 
adaptation  to  reality.  But  when  thoughts  are  not  concerned  with  the  purely 
intellectual  reproduction  and  interpretation  of  elements  of  the  universe  on  a 
rational,  logical  basis,  they  deal  with  and  are  instruments  in  the  natural 
struggle  and  in  the  social  struggle,  or  in  a  combination  of  both.  In  this  case 
our  thoughts  function  largely  as  suggestions  rather  than  as  representations 
of  reality  and  the  resulting  actions  tend  the  more  to  be  accompanied  by 
strong  emotions,  the  more  they  are  parts  of  the  social  or  natural  struggle. 
The  tendency  to  emotional  response  decreases  in  inverse  ratio  to  the  increas- 
ing importance  of  thoughts  functioning  as  symbols  of  reality. 

As  a  result  partly  of  rational  thought,  but  largely  also  because  of  the 
friction,  antagonism  and  pain  developing  in  the  soccial  and  natural  struggle, 
the  concept  of  the  "I,"  as  contrasted  with  the  concept  of  others  and  of  the 
surrounding  world,  develops.  The  "I"  is  the  individuality  in  the  psychical- 
social  sense.  This  concept  has  a  very  intricate  structure,  consisting  of  com- 
binations of  thoughts  and  emotions,  memories,  hopes  and  fears.  Like  all 
thoughts,  it  has  a  complex  origin,  its  sources  being  within  us  as  well  as  in 
the  surrounding  world.  Hence  our  "I,"  our  psychical  individuality,  does  not 
admit  of  a  sharp  separation  between  us  and  others,  between  ourselves  and 
our  environment,  although  originally  the  concept  developed  in  contact  with 
and  in  antagonism  to  the  environment. 

Related  to  the  "I"  concept  is  the  state  of  consciousness  in  our  actions  or 
attitudes.  Conscious  psychical  processes  are  those  which  form  easily  re- 
membered combinations  with  such  other  pictures,  thoughts,  emotions  and 
experiences  as  are  close  to  them  in  time  or  space,  or  have  certain  elements  in 
common  with  them.  The  term  "consciousness"  is  used  also  in  another  sense, 
in  order  to  express  the  distinction  between  psychical  and  bodily  processes ; 
our  images,  thoughts,  feelings  and  emotions  are  separated  by  us  as  conscious 
processes  from  the  chemical-physical  processes  underlying  them  and  associated 
with  them.  In  general,  most  abstract  thinking  tends  to  be  conscious  because 
it  depends  upon  large  combinations  of  experiences  and  remembered  analogies; 
it  requires  mental  exertion,  in  contradistinction  to  the  relative  absence  of 
mental  effort  connected  with  thoughts  when  they  function  as  suggestions  or 
otherwise  exist  in  a  relatively  dissociated  form.  When  a  suggestion  or  com- 
mand, direct  or  implied,  enters  into  our  mental  processes,  it  tends  to  become 
conscious  only  if  it  functions  as  a  disturbing  element.   It  is  largely  this 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         621 

conscious  thinking  and  feeling,  centering  around  the  "I,"  which  activate  in 
us  the  thought  and  feeling  that  we  possess  a  distinct  individuality.  But 
frequent  repetition  of  an  experience  or  of  certain  reactions,  and  the  conse- 
quent habit  formation  result  in  a  loss  of  the  intensity  of  thinking,  of  the 
ready  and  extensive  association  of  the  momentary  thought  with  other 
thoughts,  and  in  particular  with  the  "I"  concept,  as  well  as  of  the  accompany- 
ing emotions,  and  thus  our  mental  processes  change  from  the  conscious  to 
the  unconscious  state.  Any  impediment,  however,  arising  in  our  habitual 
actions,  making  them  more  difficult  of  performance,  again  tend  to  restitute 
conscious  processes.  There  is  a  further  factor  which  intensifies  our  feeling 
that  we  are  distinct  individualities  in  the  psychical-social  sense ;  this  is  the 
idea  that  we  have  free  will,  that  our  actions  are  in  the  last  instance  determined 
by  ourselves,  without  inner  mechanisms  or  outer  environmental  factors 
rigidly  controlling  our  choice.  The  feeling  of  freedom  of  the  will  is  conditioned 
by  the  great  complexity  of  the  factors  and  their  intricate  connections  acting 
on  us  and  directing  our  reactions. 

We  find,  phylogenetically,  a  progressively  increasing  complexity  in  the 
activities  of  organisms  and  increasing  differences  between  members  of  the 
same  species,  an  increasing  individualization  which  reaches  its  highest  de- 
velopment in  man.  Conditioned  reflexes  are  acquired  more  readily  and  in  a 
greater  variety,  the  more  highly  developed  the  species ;  but  even  in  apes  the 
highest  degree  of  apparent  freedom  of  action  depends  upon  a  very  limited  range 
of  adaptation  between  the  aims  sought  and  the  means  used  to  accomplish 
them.  Moreover,  the  reactions  in  organisms  concern  the  satisfaction  of 
relatively  simple  needs,  both  needs  and  reactions  being  constituent  parts  of 
instincts.  These  processes  remain,  to  a  great  extent,  mentally  dissociated, 
while  consciousness  depends  upon  the  ready  association  of  a  thought  with 
a  large  series  of  other  thoughts  and  with  pictures  related  to  it  in  time,  space 
and  content.  We  forget,  therefore,  much  more  readily  what  we  do  as  a 
simple  conditioned  thought  reflex  than  what  we  do  consciously ;  in  the  latter 
case  we  are  better  oriented,  but  also  more  subject  to  inhibition. 

While  in  man  thought  reflexes  also  have  their  root  in  the  needs  of  the 
organism,  the  variety  of  his  conditioned  reflexes  increases  greatly  in  all 
directions  with  the  increasing  number  of  constellations  and  suggestions 
acting  on  him.  This  increasing  complexity  is  made  possible  through  the  action 
of  the  cortex  of  the  brain,  which  mediates  between  the  environment  and  the 
more  individualized  reactions  of  the  organism.  There  develop,  thus,  a  multi- 
tude of  thought-emotion  mechanisms  and  a  play  of  interacting  thoughts  based 
on  memory,  abstraction  and  synthesis,  the  result  being  that  our  behavior 
appears  unpredictable  to  others ;  and  it  is  often  inexplicable  to  ourselves,  in 
that  we  commonly  err  in  our  judgment  or  deceive  ourselves  as  to  the  origin 
of  our  actions,  the  causal  connection  between  environmental  factors  and 
thoughts,  emotions  and  actions  being  difficult  to  establish.  The  greater  the 
complexity  of  the  factors  acting  on  and  in  the  individual,  the  greater  the 
probability  that  non-recurring  patterns  will  occur.  These  original,  unique, 
unforeseen  and  apparently  unpredictable  configurations  in  the  life  of  the 


622  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

psychical-social  organism,  together  with  his  reactions  to  them,  are  the  ex- 
pression of  the  individuality  in  the  sense  in  which  this  term  is  actually 
applied  to  higher  organisms.  Hence  individuality  is  associated  with  the  appear- 
ance of  freedom  in  his  reactions  and  with  the  increasing  difficulty  in  estab- 
lishing causal  relations  between  the  environment  of  the  individual  and  his 
actions.  This  is  the  condition  we  have  in  mind  when  we  speak  of  freedom 
of  the  will.  The  greater  the  complexity  of  the  constellations  into  which  the 
individual  and  his  environment  enter,  the  greater  become  the  individual 
variations  in  actions.  Thus,  individuality  in  the  psychical-social  sense,  the 
difference  between  the  reactions  of  different  members  of  the  same  species, 
the  complexity  of  the  factors  determining  the  behavior  and  the  non- 
predictability  of  individual  responses  resulting  from  these  complexities, 
increase  with  increasing  complications  in  structure  of  the  organism  as  a 
whole,  and  especially  of  the  nervous  system. 

We  may  summarize  the  essential  features  in  which  individuality  in  the 
more  primitive  vertebrates  differs  from  that  in  the  higher  vertebrates  as 
follows :  ( 1 )  The  stimuli  which  call  forth  a  reaction  are  more  simple  and 
stereotyped,  (2)  the  reactions  which  take  place  are  more  limited  in  number 
and  are  likewise  more  stereotyped,  and  (3)  the  degree  of  modifiability  of 
the  reaction  as  a  result  of  previous  experiences  is  of  a  lower  order  in  these 
more  primitive  forms,  and  it  increases  with  increasing  complexity  of  struc- 
tures. With  ascending  evolution  and  the  more  ready  formation  of  condi- 
tioned reflexes,  learning  takes  place  more  easily.  Structurally,  this  increase 
in  complexity  and  modifiability  of  those  conditions  of  the  behavior  by  which 
we  judge  individuality  in  the  psychical-social  sense,  is  paralleled  by  the  de- 
velopment and  increasing  differentiation  of  the  cortex  in  mammals  and  by 
the  transfer  of  the  control  of  the  most  complex  reactions  from  the  corpus 
striatum  to  the  cortex.  As  Whitman  has  already  pointed  out,  the  develop- 
ment of  instincts,  which  are  so  significant  in  the  psychical-social  life, 
especially  of  the  more  primitive  vertebrates,  corresponds  to  the  structural 
development  of  various  organ  systems;  both  gain  in  complexity  and  in  this 
respect  take  a  parallel  course  during  evolution,  and  it  is  possible  to  use  for 
taxonomic  purposes  instincts  as  well  as  organ  structures.  Instincts  and 
behavior  generally  are  contingent  on  certain  organ  functions  and  they  are 
the  direct  expression  of  organ  differentials  and  not  of  organismal  differen- 
tials, on  which  they  depend  only  indirectly.  Simple  changes  in  texture,  color 
of  the  skin  or  of  appendages  of  the  skin,  and  movements  may  determine 
species  and  individual  reactions,  and  special  movements  and  composite  series 
of  movements  (ceremonies)  may  function  as  stimuli  in  sexual  life.  Identity 
of  stimuli  in  several  related  species  may  cause  identity  of  reactions  of  these 
species  towards  one  another,  at  least  temporarily ;  if  later  other  stimuli  begin 
to  function,  which  differ  in  certain  of  the  species,  they  may  then  call  forth  a 
differentiation  in  the  reaction  of  these  species  towards  members  of  their  own 
and  towards  members  of  the  strange  though  related  species. 

The  complexity  of   the   reactions   and   the   significance  of   learning,   of 
modifiability  of  behavior  through  previous  experiences,  seem  to  be  in  general 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         623 

greater  in  birds  than  in  fishes,  although  the  principal  reaction  types  are  the 
same  in  both  these  classes,  and  may  be  recognized  even  in  mammals.  Thus 
certain  birds  which  were  hatched  or  were  reared  by  foster  mothers  belonging 
to  a  different  species,  may  flock  with  the  strange  species;  they  may  even 
mate  with  members  of  the  latter  provided  the  association  has  occurred  at  a 
sufficiently  early  period  of  life.  In  this  case,  as  in  the  induction  of  mutations, 
definite  sensitive  periods  do  exist  in  developing  organisms,  which  greatly 
antedate  the  time  when  the  reaction  takes  place.  In  this  way,  through  learning, 
even  the  species  instinct  may  to  some  extent  be  overcome. 

A  further  indication  of  the  complexity  of  behavior  in  certain  birds  comes 
out  also  in  reactions  which  lead  to  the  hiding  of  food  particles.  In  one  species 
these  reactions  may  take  place  quite  openly,  in  the  presence  of  other  birds, 
and  may  thus  be  ineffective,  while  in  another  species  they  take  place  when 
other  birds  are  absent,  and  thus  will  be  effective.  Birds,  through  experience, 
may  learn  to  recognize  dangerous  instruments,  such  as  guns  during  the 
shooting  season;  individuals  of  the  same  species  may  behave  differently  in 
city  parks,  where  their  experience  has  shown  that  they  are  safe,  and  in 
other  zones  where  they  are  exposed  to  attack.  It  appears,  then,  that  modi- 
fiability  and  individualization  in  behavior,  in  general,  are  greater  in  birds 
than  in  fishes,  greater  in  mammals  than  in  birds,  and  greater  among  the 
higher  than  among  the  more  primitive  mammals ;  in  animals,  it  reaches  its 
highest  development  in  the  anthropoid  apes,  which  are,  however,  still  much 
inferior  to  man.  Thus  evolution  of  individuality  signifies  an  increasing  variety 
and  variability  in  individual  reactions,  a  greater  adaptabilty  to  and  a  greater 
significance  of  the  environment ;  not  only  do  the  possible  reactions  of  the 
individual  become  more  numerous,  but  also  space  and  time  become  more 
differentiated  and  they  assume  greater  meaning  in  connection  with  the 
reactions  of  the  animal ;  space  and  time  become  subdivided  to  a  greater 
extent;  they  also  become  more  individualized. 

But,  increasing  complexity  of  behavior  does  not  mean  the  actual  loss  of 
instincts.  Essentially  the  same  instincts  are  present  throughout  the  whole 
vertebrate  series ;  they  are,  however,  associated  with  and,  in  the  highest 
organisms,  covered  up  by  reactions  in  which  the  behavior  is  modified  first 
by  memories  of  sense  impressions  and  by  the  action  of  suggestions ;  still 
later,  by  thoughts  and  memories  of  thoughts,  and  by  the  increasing  sig- 
nificance of  abstractions  and  new  syntheses.  Concomitantly,  there  is  a  de- 
crease in  the  predictability  of  actions  and  attitudes  of  individuals.  In  order 
to  make  predictions  it  becomes  necessary  not  only  to  know  and  to  analyze 
the  stimuli  which  act  on  or  in  an  individual  at  a  given  moment,  but  also  to  know 
his  past  history,  the  stimuli  which  have  acted  in  previous  times  and  the  situations 
which  he  has  experienced.  With  the  growing  importance  of  thoughts  and  of 
the  manipulation  of  thoughts,  with  the  greater  power  to  make  abstractions, 
and  syntheses,  and  the  increasing  significance  of  the  imaginative,  creative 
mind,  the  predictability  diminishes,  not  only  in  regard  to  the  actions  of  others, 
but  also  to  the  actions  of  ourselves.  However,  there  is  reason  for  assuming 
that  not  only  actions  appear  unpredictable,  but  also  the  formation  of  thoughts, 


624  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

which  are  contingent  on  a  variety  of  experiences  and  on  conditions  within 
the  organism.  Because  instinctive  reactions,  memories  and  sense  impressions, 
previous  thoughts  and  emotions  enter  as  constituents  into  the  type  of  our 
behavior  and  the  texture  of  our  thoughts,  both  behavior  and  thoughts  have 
become  so  intricate  that  for  practical  purposes  they  are  no  longer  determined 
and  predictable.  Instead  of  predictability,  there  arises  the  appearance  of  free 
will. 

In  philosophical  discussions  there  are,  in  its  original  meaning,  two  char- 
acteristic features  associated  with  the  concept  "individuality."  One  assumes 
distinctiveness  of  the  whole,  and  the  second  the  impossibility  of  division  with- 
out loss  of  the  individual  character.  In  the  latter  sense,  a  primitive  animal, 
consisting  of  segments  which  can  be  separated  from  each  other,  without 
destroying  the  life  and  main  characteristics  of  the  organism,  is  less  indi- 
vidualized than  a  more  complex  organism  in  which  the  parts  are  more  closely 
knit  together  and  in  which  a  separation  of  the  significant  parts  is  not  possible 
without  destroying  its  individuality  and  even  its  life.  The  individualization 
of  organisms  has  advanced  the  further  the  more  integrated  the  parts  are, 
so  that  they  form  one  connected  whole. 

The  bodily  mechanism  of  the  more  complex  organisms  is  unified  into 
individual  wholes  especially  by  the  individuality  differentials,  the  nervous 
system,  and  the  hormones  carried  by  the  circulating  fluids.  The  psychical- 
social  individuality  is  co-ordinated  essentially  by  certain  predominant  instinc- 
tive mechanisms  and  by  those  conscious  processes  which  center  around  the 
"I"  thought  complex ;  but  this  process  of  integration  at  best  is  imperfect 
and  in  various  essential  respects  the  psychical  organism  remains  dissociated. 
But  biologists  and  philosophers  have  attempted  by  other  concepts  to  integrate 
the  bodily  and  the  psychical  parts  of  an  organism  into  one  whole.  There  is 
the  concept  that  a  separate  agent,  not  further  accessible  to  analysis,  dominates 
the  parts  and  unifies  them  into  a  living  organism ;  this  agent  is  assumed  to 
exist  only  in  living  beings  and  to  differentiate  the  living  from  the  non-living. 
Others  attribute  to  the  whole,  new  characteristic  features  which  "emerge"  in 
a  manner  not  to  be  foreseen,  if  one  considers  merely  the  parts  of  which  the 
organism  is  composed  or  the  forms  from  which  the  organism  has  evolved. 
It  is  held  that  the  new  whole,  in  a  way  which  is  not  accessible  to  further 
analysis,  determines  and  directs  the  functions  of  the  various  parts  and  co- 
ordinates these  functions.  If  a  part  regenerates  the  complete  organism,  it  is 
assumed  that  the  structural  plan  of  the  whole  determines  the  regenerative 
processes.  Similarly,  according  to  this  view,  the  end  accomplished  by  the 
functioning  of  a  system  of  reflexes  determines  the  formation  and  mode  of 
action  of  the  reflexes  of  the  functioning  whole.  Tacitly,  thus,  an  agent  endowed 
with  purposeful  action  is  introduced  into  the  organism ;  it  not  only  co- 
ordinates the  parts  but  has  helped  to  create  the  organism. 

Another  hypothesis  assumes  the  existence  of  a  "mneme"  as  the  agent 
unifying  the  parts  of  the  organisms.  The  memory  of  a  preceding  change 
alters  the  future  state  and  behavior  of  an  organism  in  a  specific  manner, 
which  is  conditioned  by  the  character  of  the  first  change  or  experience  acting 


BASIS  OF  PSYCHICAL-SOCIAL  INDIVIDUALITY         625 

on  a  specific  substratum.  The  regeneration  of  lost  portions  in  a  primitive 
organism  is  attributed  to  the  initiating  action  of  a  psychical  process  cor- 
responding to  memory  and  thought  in  higher  organisms.  Adaptive  features 
characteristic  of  a  species  are  due  to  the  action  of  a  memory-like  agent,  and 
instincts  are  remembrances  of  formerly  purposeful  actions. 

Similarly,  a  mneme-like  agent  would  direct  the  return  of  certain  animals  at 
definite  periods  of  their  life  to  the  place  where  they  had  been  at  a  preceding 
phase,  and  the  sentimental  attachment  of  human  beings  to  their  place  of 
birth  and  to  their  nation  would  be  an  analogous  process.  In  like  manner,  the 
habits  of  social  insects  are  compared  to  human  social  modes  of  living  and 
institutions.  But  in  the  origin  of  the  latter  there  enter  thoughts,  suggestions, 
and  many  other  factors  so  loosely  connected  with  each  other  that  they 
appear  as  accidental.  Human  social  life  is  modifiable.  Men  may  even  dispense 
with  social  life  almost  altogether  and  live  as  more  or  less  isolated  beings. 
Human  institutions  are  plastic,  although  ultimately  they  also  may  have  their 
roots  in  reflex  systems,  while  insect  organization  depends  almost  exclusively 
upon  the  action  of  reflex  systems  which  are  non-plastic,  fixed  in  character. 
Thus  complex  social  phenomena,  in  which  modifiable  suggestions  of  various 
kinds  and  experiences  in  the  social  struggle  due  to  variable  cultural  con- 
stellations play  a  prominent  part,  are  considered  as  closely  related  to  the 
reflex  actions  of  more  primitive  organisms,  and  the  hypothesis  is  introduced 
that  the  complex  factors  which  are  potent  in  human  beings  are  likewise 
potent  in  much  more  primitive  organisms.  Instead  of  explaining  the  simple 
by  the  complex,  it  seems  more  promising  as  a  method  of  investigative  pro- 
cedure to  attempt  to  discover  the  more  simple  components  in  the  complex 
processes  and  to  reduce,  therefore,  the  latter  to  the  former.  On  these  alter- 
native modes  of  procedure  seem  to  hinge  the  chief  differences  between 
mechanism  and  vitalism  in  the  interpretation  of  living  organisms. 

A  further  assumption  holds  that  there  is  a  non-causal,  irrational  com- 
ponent, inaccessible  to  scientific  analysis,  in  human  behavior.  A  part  which 
is  not  yet  analyzed  and  still  unknown  is  identified  with  the  unknowable,  and 
the  unknowable  is  considered  as  not  subject  to  the  regularities  existing 
elsewhere  in  nature  and  therefore  as  irrational  from  the  human  point  of  view. 
Support  for  this  belief  is  sought  in  the  lack  of  determinism  which  char- 
acterizes subatomic  phenomena,  where  it  is  possible  to  determine  either 
position  or  velocity  of  the  constituents  of  an  atom,  but  not  both  at  the  same 
time,  and  related  to  it  is  the  assumption  that  because  fictitious  statements 
play  a  temporary  role  in  science  and  because  the  symbols  we  use  are  only 
imperfect  representations  of  reality — behaving  in  certain  respects  like 
metaphors  with  an  "as  if"  character — all  our  conclusions  are  equally  fictitious. 
The  entelechy  of  Driesch  would  also  constitute  a  metaphysical  factor  direct- 
ing organisms  in  general  as  well  as  human  personality,  and  even  some 
experimental  biologists,  who  analyze  life  processes  in  accordance  with 
mechanistic  principles  postulate  in  addition  the  action  of  specific  vital  forces 
which  are  inaccessible  to  experimental  methods. 

The  existence  of  agents  other  than  those  physical-chemical  factors  known 


626  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

to  be  active  in  both  the  inorganic  world  and  in  organisms,  might  serve  not 
only  to  unify  the  living  individual  into  one  indivisible  whole,  but  might  also 
imbue  him  with  a  distinctiveness  which  is  one  of  the  implied  characteristics 
especially  of  human  individuality.  It  would  therefore  satisfy  a  deeply  felt 
desire  of  man  to  be  "himself"  only,  to  be  unique  and  endowed  with  self 
determination  and  free  will.  Yet  the  investigator  must  proceed  in  the  study 
of  individuality  according  to  the  rules  which  alone  have  proven  successful  so 
far  in  all  the  other  fields  of  science. 


Chapter  2 
Individuality  and  World 


In  the  preceding  chapter  we  have  followed  in  the  animal  series  the 
evolution  of  individuality  in  the  psychical-social  sense  and  we  have  seen 
that  it  reaches  its  full  expression  only  in  man.  This  highest  type  of 
individuality  we  shall  now  analyze  still  further.  The  term  "individuality" 
implies  a  distinction  between  the  organism  with  its  psychical  attributes  and 
activities,  the  inner  world,  and  the  surrounding,  non-living,  as  well  as  the 
living  and  human  social  world,  the  outer  world.  It  also  suggests  the  concept 
of  the  uniqueness  of  the  individual  and  of  his  self-determination  in  his 
relations  with  the  environment,  in  contradistinction  to  the  organism  as  a 
mechanism  or  an  automaton;  self-determination  carries  with  it,  as  a  corollary, 
responsibility  for  one's  actions  and  attitudes.  These  concepts  of  individuality 
have  arisen  in  the  course  of  the  activities  of  daily  life,  in  response  to  the 
problems  man  has  to  face  and  the  manifold  difficulties  he  has  to  overcome. 
For  a  fuller  understanding  of  the  development  of  the  feeling  of  individuality 
it  will  therefore  be  necessary  to  analyze  the  distinction  between  inner  and 
outer  world. 

On  the  basis  of  our  sense  impressions  and  by  means  of  abstraction  and 
synthesis,  we  have  created  a  thought  structure  of  the  surrounding  non-living 
physical  and  chemical  world,  as  well  as  of  the  surrounding  living  world  of 
organisms,  and  in  both  worlds  the  same  constituents  occur.  The  environ- 
mental factors  act  on  our  senses  as  stimuli  and  may  appear  to  us  partly  as 
variable  and  partly  as  constant  factors,  while  we  assume  that  our  sense 
organs  are  constant,  although  they  also  in  reality  may  be  variable.  After  we 
have  dissociated  from  ourselves  the  outer  non-living  and  living  world  which, 
by  means  of  critical  analysis,  we  have  transformed  or  attempted  to  transform 
into  constant  and  variable  physical-chemical  units,  we  consider  further  the 
interactions  of  the  outer  world  with  our  sense  organs,  nervous  system  and 
other  constituent  parts  of  our  body.  In  this  analysis  we  may  tentatively 
regard  the  elements  of  which  the  outer  world  is  composed  as  more  or  less 
constant  and  our  body  and  its  constituents  as  variable.  Through  the  study  of 
the  variability  of  our  organism  in  its  interaction  with  the  environment,  we 
create  the  science  of  physiology.  As  a  result  of  this  interaction  between  the 
outer  world  and  our  own  organism,  there  develop  on  the  basis  of  our  sense 
impressions  thoughts  and  emotions,  which  on  their  part  may  then  interact 
with  our  nervous  mechanisms,  with  our  muscles  and  our  bodily  functions. 
There  is  thus  a  circuit  from  the  outer  world  by  way  of  sense  impressions 
and  our  organ  systems  to  thoughts  and  emotions,  and  from  these,  in  the 
reverse  way,  to  the  outer  world.  This  circuit  we  study  by  means  of  abstrac- 
tions that  are  shifted  and  re-synthesized  in  such  a  manner. that  the  essential 
constants  are  separated  from  variable,  accidental  factors;  such  an  analysis, 

627 


628  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

as  far  as  sense  impressions,  the  origin  of  thoughts  and  emotions  and  their 
effects  are  involved,  represent  the  subject  matter  of  psychology.  As  a  further 
step  we  recognize  in  our  outer  world  other  human  organisms,  consisting  of 
physiological  and  psychological  factors  similar  to  our  own,  while  other  living 
organisms — animals  and  plants — show  graded  differences  from  ourselves. 
The  physical-chemical,  non-living  environment,  as  well  as  the  world  of  living 
organisms,  except  ourselves,  represents  then  our  outer  world,  while  we, 
with  our  sense  impressions,  feelings,  thoughts,  emotions,  wills  and  desires 
represent  our  inner  world. 

Thus  our  inner  and  outer  worlds  both  consist  to  a  large  extent  of  the  same 
psychical  elements,  our  sensations;  also,  both  worlds  are  composed  of  the 
same  physical-chemical  elements  and  this  is  true  of  all  organs  and  tissues  of 
the  body,  including  those  on  whose  functions  our  psychical  activities  depend. 
In  the  physical  and  psychical  realms,  the  outer  world  and  "we"  are  consti- 
tuted of  the  same  elements.  Sense  impressions  stand  on  the  borderline  between 
inner  and  outer  world,  and  they,  with  our  thoughts,  represent  a  combination 
of  environmental  and  inner  organismal  factors.  It  is  by  means  of  sense 
impressions  that  we  construct  both  worlds  and  connect  the  two.  With  their 
aid  we  build  an  outer  world,  to  which  we  attribute  an  existence  independent 
of  our  own  organism  as  a  separate  external  reality,  which  we  take  for  proven 
because  of  the  fact  that  our  interpretation  of  things  and  our  prediction  of 
future  events,  made  on  the  basis  of  our  thought-constructions,  may  prove 
correct,  and  also  because  of  the  fact  that  this  reality  is  experienced  in  the 
same  way  by  all  human  beings  who  have  adequate  knowledge  and  under- 
standing. 

We  believe  that  we  are  aware  of  our  inner  world  directly,  without  the 
intervention  of  our  sense  organs,  while  we  realize  that  we  recognize  the 
outer  world  by  means  of  these  sense  organs.  The  inner  world  constitutes  for 
us  our  real  individuality,  and  especially  those  parts  of  our  inner  world 
centering  around  the  concept  "I,"  which  latter  again  is  gained  by  means  of 
abstractions  and  synthesis,  like  other  thoughts.  As  far  as  our  psychical 
elements  undergo  within  us  variations  which  we  do  not  fully  understand, 
and  which  are  different  at  different  times  and  which  may  differ  in  different 
individuals  under  apparently  the  same  conditions,  they  are  considered  as 
subjective.  The  outer  world  is  considered  as  objective,  independent  of 
changes  within  us,  and  to  a  higher  degree  constant.  This  is  one  of  the  reasons 
why  we  make  such  distinctions  as  outer  and  inner  world. 

Through  the  interaction  between  the  outer  world  and  our  sense  organs  we 
become  aware  of  events,  which  are  singled  out  and  differentiated  from 
others  and  compared  with  similar  preceding  ones.  Events  then  become  pre- 
dictable; the  sense  organs  appear,  thus,  to  be  constant,  identical  at  different 
times  in  the  same  person  in  the  same  environment,  and  also  identical  in 
different  persons;  they  seem  largely  independent  of  other  parts  of  our 
variable  organism.  Those  sense  experiences  which  are  common  to  all  humans, 
which  are  reproducible  and  which  represent,  therefore,  a  mechanism,  we 
tend  to  refer  to  the  outer  world.  On  the  other  hand,  thoughts  and  emotions 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  629 

of  our  inner  world  are  variable ;  they  cannot  apparently  be  referred  to 
environmental  constants  with  the  same  fixity  and  definiteness  as  can  the  sense 
impressions;  thoughts  and  emotions  seem  individual  and  indeterminate,  dif- 
fering in  different  persons  at  the  same  time  and  place.  Hence,  thoughts  and 
emotions  appear  not  to  be  predictable. 

Thoughts  represent  abstractions  and  syntheses  into  which  memories  of 
individually  varying  experiences  enter.  The  emotional  reactions  also  vary 
widely  in  different  persons  and  have  much  of  the  character  of  a  mystery, 
because  in  the  individual  affected  they  are  largely  unanalyzed.  In  this  sense 
our  bodily  organismal  constitution  as  a  whole,  and  especially  the  brain 
activities,  in  which  our  thoughts  and  emotions  originate,  seem  more  particu- 
larly our  own  than  the  operations  of  the  sense  organs,  which  reproduce  for 
us  our  environment.  What  is  unique  and  unexplainable,  and  therefore  appar- 
ently free  and  not  a  directly  determined  function  of  the  environment,  we 
refer  thus  to  the  inner  world,  to  our  psychical  individuality. 

But  if  we  analyze  our  inner  world  still  further,  we  find,  as  stated  above, 
that  it  as  well  as  our  outer  world  consists  largely  of  sense  impressions ; 
these  enter  as  essential  constituents  into  our  pictures,  thoughts  and  wills, 
which  are  derived  primarily  from  the  outside.  There  may  also  participate  in 
the  construction  of  our  inner  world,  those  sensations  which  originate  in  cer- 
tain parts  of  our  own  body.  When  we  speak  our  thoughts  or  see  our  own 
body,  we  perceive  them  through  the  ear  and  eye  as  we  perceive  those  of 
another  individual.  Certain  psychologists  go  so  far  as  to  maintain  that  all 
our  thoughts  are  perceived  as  the  result  of  the  activities  of  our  speech 
muscles,  even  if  we  do  not  actually  speak.  It  is  especially  the  memory  and 
anticipation  of  the  feelings  associated  with  muscle  contractions  in  response 
to  certain  thoughts  and  pictures  which  make  us  aware  of  our  will.  Further- 
more, there  is  added  to  the  central,  psychical  constituent  of  our  individuality, 
a  picture  of  our  bodily  configuration.  We  acquire  this  picture  of  our  body 
gradually  as  we  acquire  that  of  another  individual.  Our  body,  as  well  as  our 
mind,  is  to  a  large  extent  strange  to  us.  If  we  see  our  own  image  in  an 
unusual  set  of  mirrors,  we  are  astonished  that  this  is  a  reflection  of  our- 
selves. The  physicist  and  philosopher,  Ernst  Mach,  when  entering  a  bus  and 
seeing  his  image  in  a  mirror  exclaimed,  "Who  is  the  school  teacher  that 
enters  this  car !"  We  have  to  become  acquainted  with  our  own  body  as  with 
the  body  of  another  person ;  also  with  our  own  mind  as  with  the  minds  of 
others.  The  "self"  or  "I"  is  an  abstraction ;  it  does  not  really  exist  in  the 
sense  in  which  we  believe  it  exists.  We  hardly  know  our  own  self  any  better 
than  we  know  other  individuals  or  the  world  around  us. 

However,  when  we  analyze  more  in  detail  our  individuality  in  the 
psychical  sense,  we  find  that  the  interactions  between  what  we  consider  as 
outer  and  as  inner  world  are  still  more  complex  than  the  preceding  con- 
siderations have  indicated.  This  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  thought  reflex 
works  in  two  directions.  A  thought  as  a  representation  of  the  outer  world 
may  set  in  motion  in  our  organism  corresponding  functions  of  various  organ 
systems,  and  in  particular,  motor  reactions ;  thus  the  picture  of  a  good  meal 


630  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

stimulates  gastric  secretion  and  certain  pictures  with  sexual  content  may 
set  in  motion,  by  way  of  reflex,  certain  sexual  activities.  These  pictures  may 
be  supplied  by  social  institutions  created  by  us,  as  for  instance,  by  eating 
places,  by  theatres.  The  outer  world  thus  interacts  with  our  organismal 
functions  by  means  of  pictures,  thoughts.  But,  conversely,  gastric  contrac- 
tions during  hunger  may  stimulate  certain  picture-thoughts  of  a  good  meal, 
with  the  accompanying  emotions.  Or  certain  reflex  processes  occurring  in 
the  sexual  organs  may  secondarily  call  forth  the  corresponding  thought- 
emotion  complexes,  and  the  memories  of  the  latter  may  subsequently  again 
set  in  motion  sexual  functions.  In  this  manner  a  very  intricate  play  between 
outer  world  and  inner  world,  between  our  thoughts  and  our  organism, 
constantly  takes  place.  The  outer  world  acts  on  our  inner  world  by  means 
of  sensations,  pictures  and  thoughts,  which  also  function  as  suggestions, 
and  through  them  the  outer  world  influences  our  actions  and  our  attitudes. 
Thus,  thoughts  having  their  source  in  sense  impressions,  exercise  their  effects 
essentially  through  the  things  and  events  which  they  represent,  and  there 
exist  only  quantitative  differences  in  vividness  and  effectiveness  between  the 
direct  experience  and  the  effect  of  thoughts ;  both  are  complicated,  but  to  a 
varying  degree,  by  a  relationship  to  other  thoughts. 

Furthermore,  those  of  our  motor  reactions  which  follow  thought-emotion 
complexes  and  are  often  induced  by  the  latter,  may  lead  to  thoughts  which 
are  conscious  and  which  make  connection  with  the  "I"  concept,  while  the 
simple  reflexes  connecting  our  senses  with  our  muscles  by  way  of  ganglia, 
are  usually  unaccompanied  by  conscious  thoughts.  There  are,  besides,  many 
sense  impressions  acting  on  an  organism,  together  with  memories  of  past 
experiences,  which  do  not  find  direct  release  in  motor  actions  but  merely  in 
thoughts  and  emotions ;  these  again  tend  to  lead  to  an  extension  of  conscious 
thought  and  emotion  processes;  they  may  ultimately  find  expression  in 
scientific,  philosophic,  or  artistic  productions.  In  order  to  be  able  to  under- 
stand and  predict  the  phenomena  of  our  varied  reactions,  there  would  be 
required  in  all  these  cases,  a  much  more  intricate  and  searching  analysis  of 
the  common  factors  underlying  these  processes,  than  can,  as  a  rule,  be  made 
at  the  present  time. 

Processes  and  things  involving  common  unit  factors  and  differing  from 
others  in  experimentally  reproducible  constellations  of  these  unit  factors  and 
their  mutual  relations  are  mechanisms.  In  general,  constant  relations  between 
events,  which  show  definite  sequences  in  time,  are  what  we  consider  causes 
and  effects,  the  former  preceding  the  latter  constellations;  to  establish  these 
relationships  is  to  explain ;  what  can  be  explained  in  this  way  is  in  a  wider 
sense  a  mechanism ;  it  is  opposed  to  what  is  indeterminable  and  non-rational. 
However,  in  many  instances  we  are  satisfied  with  attaching  a  word  or  a 
label  to  a  thing  or  process,  and  having  thus  attained  the  possibility  of 
handling  in  our  mind  this  thing  or  process  for  the  purposes  of  mental  opera- 
tions, especially  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  natural  and 
social  struggle,  we  are  satisfied.  In  contrast  to  the  term  "mechanism"  "indi- 
viduality" implies,  by  definition,  something  unique  and  therefore  not  repro- 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  631 

ducible,  not  explainable ;  hence  individuality  is  assumed  to  be  essentially  non- 
rational.  But  in  reality,  the  nature  of  individuality  represents  a  problem  to 
be  analyzed  and  explained.  The  non-rational  of  today  may  be  the  mechanism 
of  tomorrow.  The  manifoldness  of  human  individuality  depends  upon  varia- 
tions in  the  organization  of  the  individual  and  in  the  reactions  of  the  indi- 
vidual to  different  environments.  These  are  accessible  to  analysis  and  there 
are  at  least  indications  that  such  variations  are  the  manifestations  of  con- 
nected mechanisms. 

Our  will  is  assumed  by  us  to  depend  on  our  thoughts  and  inasmuch  as 
thoughts  appear  as  isolated  phenomena,  detached  from  the  reflex  circuit  of 
which  they  are  really  a  part,  and  inasmuch  as  we  have  forgotten  the  experi- 
ences which  gave  origin  to  them,  our  will  appears  to  us  as  a  free,  indeter- 
mined  phenomenon.  It  is  not  predictable,  it  cannot  be  duplicated  in  others, 
it  is  considered  by  us  to  be  our  own,  the  expression  of  our  individuality, 
which  is  therefore  characterized  by  free  will. 

Yet  the  more  we  study  the  actions  and  attitudes  of  human  beings,  the 
greater  the  degree  of  our  experience,  the  less  becomes  the  range  of  indeter- 
mined  actions.  We  learn  to  know  of  the  reflexes  active  in  us  and  of  the 
establishment  of  conditioned  reflexes ;  we  analyze  our  sense  impressions,  our 
thoughts,  which  depend  upon  sense  impressions  and  complex  experiences ;  we 
observe  the  accompaniment  by  emotions  of  thoughts  and  motor  activity,  and 
in  particular  of  inhibited  activities ;  and  furthermore,  we  note  the  stimu- 
lating and  inhibiting  effects  of  suggestions,  those  given  from  the  outside  by 
the  spoken  words  and  actions  of  others  and  those  resulting  from  our  own 
thoughts  and  actions,  which  we  remember  as  we  do  those  of  others  and 
which  function  in  like  manner.  Especially  susceptible  to  analysis  are  experi- 
mental posthypnotic  suggestions  and  their  consequences,  which  subjectively 
may  appear  as  expressions  of  free  will.  Furthermore  as  others  issue  com- 
mands to  us,  so  we  issue  commands  to  ourselves.  We  know  what,  under 
certain  conditions,  will  happen  to  our  person,  as  we  know  what  will  happen 
to  things  and  living  beings  around  us.  Remembering  the  consequences  of 
former  experiences  and  the  thoughts  and  actions  following  our  choices  and 
decisions,  new,  complex  conditioned  reflexes,  pleasant  in  some  cases,  in- 
hibiting, painful  in  others,  develop  and  complicate  our  attitudes.  The  choices 
and  decisions  made  in  the  past,  act  therefore  as  suggestions  tending  to 
influence  our  future  course.  But  in  addition,  we  know  of  the  effect  of 
chemical  and  physical  factors  and  of  changes  in  our  bodily  structures  and 
functions  on  our  thoughts  and  actions.  All  our  experiences  and  the  subse- 
quent analysis  of  the  interaction  between  our  thoughts  and  our  organism 
affect  and  regulate  our  bodily  reactions.  This  very  complex,  and  therefore 
incompletely  known  and  only  partly  predictable  balancing  of  factors  which 
determines  our  actions,  is  what  is  felt  as  freedom  of  will  in  the  circuit  of 
outer  world  — >  sense  impression  — »  thought  -»  reaction.  Usually  we  develop 
conscious  thoughts  only  of  the  central  and  efferent,  but  not  of  the  afferent  com- 
ponents of  these  thought  reflexes,  a  condition  which  tends  further  to  foster  in  us 
the  feeling  of  inner  freedom.  These  relations  of  "ourselves"  to  "ourselves," 


632  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  effect  of  our  own  thoughts  and  suggestions  on  our  behavior  and  attitudes, 
and  especially  the  fact  that  the  addition  or  lack  of  a  thought  may  turn  the 
balance  in  our  responses  in  one  or  the  other  direction,  all  these  factors 
constitute  largely  the  substratum  which,  in  its  complexity,  gives  us  the  feeling 
of  freedom ;  and  it  is  just  this  apparently  free  and  non-determined,  or  rather 
self -determining,  part  of  our  actions  and  expressions  which  we  feel  as  the 
most  characteristic  feature  of  our  individuality. 

The  most  conscious  thoughts  associating  readily  with  other  thought- 
emotion  complexes,  and  especially  also  with  the  "I"  complex,  the  directing 
thought-emotion  processes  in  us  are  felt  as  the  constants  in  our  individuality, 
which  operate  and  connect  the  states  of  our  changing  organism  and  our 
actions  in  successive  periods  and  apparently  make  it  one  homogeneous  con- 
sistent whole  representing  our  real  self.  It  is  this  part  of  us  which  seems 
to  us  to  be  independent  of  the  outer  world,  in  contrast  with  our  bodily  func- 
tions and  simpler  nervous  automatisms,  which  evidently  depend  upon  the 
interaction  with  the  outer  world  and  which  do  not  therefore  represent  solely 
ourselves. 

The  central  governing  thought-emotion  processes,  affect  in  a  direct  manner 
our  own  organism,  and  in  particular  our  muscles,  but  secondarily  they  can 
also  affect  and  change  our  environment,  of  which,  to  some  extent,  we  thus 
become  the  master.  In  a  measure  however,  we  can,  besides,  control  ourselves. 
Our  conscious  thoughts  can  automatically,  by  their  mere  functioning,  suppress 
injurious  emotional  reactions  and  direct  our  responses  in  a  rational  way. 
Thinking,  as  such,  about  our  actions  may  thus  function  in  an  automatic  way 
as  a  moderator,  and  it  is  especially  through  such  a  mechanism  that  we  feel 
our  will  is  free. 

But  this  mechanism  needs  further  analysis.  The  conditioned  reflexes  active 
in  us  are  often  associated  with  thoughts  and  pictures  which  we  may  describe 
and  analyze  and  thus  reproduce.  These  thoughts  and  pictures  may  develop 
in  us  also  in  a  more  complex  roundabout  way  by  means  of  chains  of  thoughts 
which,  however,  usually  have  likewise  been  set  in  motion  through  outside 
stimuli.  They  are  of  the  same  kind  as  those  which  are  transmitted  to  us  by 
others,  or  by  reading.  Thoughts  may  thus  come  to  us  in  various  ways.  How- 
ever, if,  as  usual,  the  source  of  these  thoughts  is  not  clear  to  us,  then  they 
appear  to  us  to  originate  spontaneously  in  ourselves  and  to  be  the  expression 
of  our  free  will,  of  our  individuality.  The  pictures  and  thoughts,  associated 
with  what  we  do  and  entering  as  a  factor  into  our  conditioned  reflex 
mechanisms,  may  intensify  the  reflex  action  automatically;  on  the  other 
hand,  also,  a  process  inhibiting  these  pictures  and  thoughts  and  at  the 
same  time  making  the  thoughts  conscious  may  develop,  and  this  latter  process 
may  interfere  not  only  with  these  pictures  and  thoughts,  but  also  with  the 
primary  conditioned  reflexes  which  set  these  processes  of  thinking  in  motion. 
In  this  manner  rationally  connected  thoughts  may  interfere  with  our  primary, 
more  simple  reactions ;  they  may  control  and  make  rational  our  actions,  and 
they  exert  these  effects  by  means  of  mechanisms  which  may  not  become 
conscious  to  us.  Complex  sense  impressions,   their  memories,  as   well  as 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  633 

thoughts,  are  sources  of  our  pleasure  and  pain,  and  we  treat  thoughts  as  we 
do  complex  sensations ;  we  divide  them  into  parts,  eliminate  some  of  these 
and  synthesize  others,  and  again  the  process  of  creating  these  abstractions 
gives  us  the  impression  of  free  will ;  it  appears  to  us  as  individual,  as  an 
action  carried  out  in  accordance  with  "our"  wishes,  in  contrast  with  the 
rigidity  of  a  direct  sense  impression  -»  motor  reaction  chain — where  the  reflex 
mechanism  is  much  more  evident.  Our  ability  to  combine  series  of  thoughts 
into  into  one  associated  texture,  with  which  process  is  joined  the  memory  of 
thoughts  and  their  subsequent  realization  in  actions  and  the  connection  of 
these  thought  textures  and  actions  with  the  "I"  are  functions  which  represent 
the  highest  degree  of  consciousness. 

What  we  experience,  then,  above  all,  as  our  freedom  and  as  the  expression 
of  our  individuality,  is  this  ready  formation  of  picture  and  thought  textures 
of  a  coordinated  and  of  a  superordinated  kind,  the  latter  representing  a 
more  comprehensive  abstraction  and  synthesis  of  thoughts. 

But  observation  and  analysis  reveal  to  us  that  there  are  many  limitations 
to  our  apparent  freedom.  There  are,  above  all,  suggestions  which  limit  the 
free  association  of  our  thoughts,  limit  thereby  our  freedom,  the  expression 
of  our  individuality;  however,  this  lack  of  freedom  is  not  always  conscious, 
it  is  recognized  by  means  of  superordinated  thoughts  only  under  certain 
conditions,  more  especially  if  the  suggestion  takes  the  form  of  a  command 
imposed  upon  us  and  thus  conflicts  with  the  spontaneous  trend  of  our 
thoughts.  Also,  fashion,  ritual,  tradition,  which  are  systematized  suggestions 
often  functioning  as  habits,  and  the  suggestions  given  us  in  childhood  may 
limit  the  freedom  of  our  actions,  the  expression  of  our  rational  activity ;  but 
these  inhibitions  and  limitations  even  more  commonly  may  not  become 
conscious  in  us,  because  as  habits  they  do  not  usually  lead  to  inner  friction 
and  conflict,  but  rather  give  us  mild  and  pleasant  emotions,  and  function  as 
normal  constituents  of  our  psychical  life.  It  is  only  those  suggestions  which 
strongly  disturb  our  systems  of  thoughts  and  wills,  which  become  conscious  in 
us  as  outside  interferences,  against  which  we  react.  Other  suggestions,  on 
the  contrary,  may  give  us  emotions  of  a  very  satisfactory  kind;  they  may 
sustain  and  justify  our  thoughts  and  wills  and  support  us  under  adverse 
conditions.  We  justify  and  uphold  then  such  suggestions  and  we  react 
emotionally  against  thoughts  or  conditions  which  tend  to  oppose  them  and 
to  prevent  their  realization. 

However,  even  suggestions  which  are  accepted  as  a  part  of  our  own 
thought-system  and  which  act  unconsciously  may  restrict  the  freedom  of  our 
thoughts  and  actions  and  have  far-reaching  effects,  inasmuch  as  they  may 
limit  our  contact  and  our  relations  with  the  social  and  non-social  environ- 
ment, the  growth  of  our  individuality,  and  our  ability  to  discover  things  and 
to  exert  rational  self-control.  They  may  interfere  with  the  processes  from 
which  result  recognition  of  new  elements  in  our  environment  and  a  more 
adequate  adaptation  to  the  environment.  They  may  thus  tend  to  diminish  the 
horizon  and  content  of  our  world.  In  particular,  they  may  restrict  the 
deeper  understanding  of  the  social  struggle  and  the  corresponding  develop- 


634  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

merit  of  sympathy  and  pity.  Thus,  rigid  ritualized  group-action  may  replace 
our  initiative  and  coordination  of  thoughts  and  actions  as  the  highest 
expression  of  our  individuality.  On  the  other  hand,  these  types  of  organized 
suggestion  may  also  be  helpful ;  they  are  economic,  inasmuch  as  they  save  us 
the  expense  of  energy  in  the  process  of  analytic  thinking  and  of  creating; 
and  moreover,  they  provide  the  feeling  of  security  and  remove  from  us  the 
weight  of  responsibility.  One  of  the  most  distinguishing  features  between 
different  individuals  is  the  relative  power  of  suggestion,  on  the  one  hand, 
and  of  freely  associating  and  directing  thoughts,  on  the  other.  Furthermore, 
the  tendency  of  these  thoughts  and  their  resulting  actions  to  make  conscious 
connections  with  the  "I"  and  the  extent  and  comprehensiveness  of  the  "I" 
differ  very  much  in  different  individuals,  the  different  "IV  varying  greatly 
as  to  their  content  of  environmental  constituents,  especially  those  of  a  social 
character.  The  "I"  concept  is  already  present  in  the  young  child ;  it  may  be 
active  also  in  our  sleep,  where  we  refer  to  and  connect  with  "ourselves" 
memories  usually  of  recent  events,  of  thoughts  we  have  had  or  about  which 
we  have  read. 

The  more  readily  we  remember  our  thoughts  and  consequent  actions,  and 
the  more  we  are  capable  of  relating  them  in  a  consistent  and  logical  manner 
to  the  whole  texture  of  our  thoughts,  and  especially  to  the  "I"  concept,  the 
more  our  thoughts  and  actions  are  modifiable.  On  the  contrary,  in  so  far  as 
thoughts  function  as  suggestions  in  us,  they  are  rigid  and  our  actions  and 
attitudes  are  not  readily  modifiable.  As  stated,  individuals  manifest  marked 
differences  as  to  the  relative  preponderance  of  modifiable  and  less  modifiable 
thoughts,  as  to  their  sensitiveness  towards  thoughts  and  impressions  coming 
from  the  social  as  well  as  the  non-social  environment,  and  as  to  the  readiness 
with  which  thoughts  and  impressions  act  as  suggestions.  The  easily  remem- 
bered conscious  thoughts  are  relatively  labile,  while  the  unremembered 
thoughts,  suggestions,  or  the  processes  underlying  or  accompanying  them, 
influence  our  actions  and  attitudes  in  a  rigid  manner  because  they  are 
separate  and  not  readily  brought  into  connection  with  other  thoughts. 

The  relations  between  inner  and  outer  world  have  changed  in  our  con- 
sciousness in  the  course  of  human  history.  Man  created  pictures  of  an  outer 
world  and  of  an  inner  world;  in  so  doing  he  created  not  only  an  anthropo- 
centric  world,  but  also  an  egocentric  world.  He  saw  himself,  or  beings  like 
himself,  everywhere  in  the  outer  world.  He  felt  the  fate  of  the  others  as  his 
own  fate  and  their  experiences  called  forth  emotions  of  sympathy  and  pity. 
Or  he  reacted  to  them  as  to  competitors  or  enemies  with  emotions  of  dislike 
and  antagonism.  He  obeyed  or  struggled  against  other  human  beings  who 
gave  him  commands.  The  effects  of  suggestion  predominated  very  much 
over  the  purely  logical-intellectual  analysis;  the  emotions  of  fear  and  hope 
were  correspondingly  very  active.  His  world  centered  around  himself.  In 
this  egocentric  world  things  have  values  as  material  goods  or  as  psychical 
goods.  Men  fight  for  these,  for  the  maintenance  and  elevation  of  their  indi- 
viduality and  for  a  certain  picture  concept  which  they  have  of  their  own 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  635 

personality.  This  is  the  world  of  the  social  struggle  and  the  struggle  with 
nature. 

Poetry  and  art  have  been,  and  continue  to  be,  largely  expressions  of  our 
egocentric  attitude  towards  the  world ;  they  represent  us  and  our  experiences, 
our  feelings  and  emotions.  They  attach  meaning  to  our  world,  or  they  intensify 
and  extend  the  meaning  and  significance  of  our  world  and  of  our  life  and 
they  may  picture  a  world  and  life  from  which  fear  and  disharmony  are  more 
and  more  eliminated.  They  tend  to  convert  an  inanimate,  cold,  non-feeling 
world  into  an  animate  world,  in  which  feeling  and  human  meaning  is 
extended  and  intensified,  so  that  we  can  find  ourselves  and  beings  like  us 
everywhere.  But  gradually  the  character  of  this  egocentric  world  has  under- 
gone changes.  The  surrounding  world,  the  universe,  begins  to  center  around 
us  in  a  different  sense.  In  the  interactions  between  the  outer  world  and  our- 
selves we  find  identities  and  differences ;  we  abstract  from  the  differences  and 
combine  new  similarities.  In  this  way  there  is  gradually  created  a  second 
world,  that  of  simple  and  complex  sensations  and  a  logical  world  of  things 
and  interactions  in  which  we  and  beings  like  ourselves  live.  It  no  longer 
centers  around  ourselves  and  in  it  we  are  merely  a  small  part  of  a  strange 
universe ;  but  more  and  more  it  becomes  to  us  the  real  world ;  it  is  the  world 
revealed  by  scientific  analysis  and  synthesis.  We  adapt  ourselves  also  to  this 
world ;  we  make  it  our  own  by  understanding  it  and  we  attempt  to  make  it 
respond  to  our  needs,  wishes,  hopes  and  fears.  There  still  radiate  from 
ourselves  thoughts  and  emotions  out  to  the  universe;  the  universe  is  still 
bound  up  with  us  and  we  with  it  in  one  thought  structure. 

In  the  course  of  time  there  begins  to  be  added  to  this  analysis  of  the 
outer  world,  an  analysis  of  our  inner  world,  of  the  world  of  myth  which 
we  have  created,  of  social  and  natural  struggles  and  the  emotions  they  elicit. 
We  form  concepts  not  only  of  the  environment  and  of  other  human  beings, 
but  also  or  our  own  organism  or  parts  of  it  and  its  relations  with  the  outer 
world,  and  we  realize  the  vast  differences  between  the  egocentric  and  the 
non-egocentric  conceptions  of  the  universe.  These  two  developments,  that  of 
the  egocentric  world,  eventuating  in  the  formation  of  pictures  of  ourselves 
around  which  everything  else  centers,  and  that  of  the  objective  world,  of 
which  we  are  merely  a  very  small  and  relatively  unimportant  part,  have 
proceeded  side  by  side  throughout  human  history.  It  is  the  varying  relative 
importance  of  these  two  world  conceptions  which  have  determined  largely 
the  nature  of  our  civilization,  and  the  life  we  live  is  a  compromise  between 
these  two  antagonistic  attitudes. 

Yet  physiologically  each  of  us  remains  bound  up  with  his  organism,  and 
the  needs  and  functions  of  the  latter  continue  to  make  ourselves  the  center 
of  our  own  small  universe;  we  therefore  still  make  use  of  poetry  and  art  to, 
change  the  concept  of  the  world  around  us  and  of  human  beings  and  human 
relations  in  accordance  with  our  needs  and  wishes.  It  is  the  analytic, 
scientific  world  which  restricts  such  egocentric  thinking  and  influences  and 
changes  the  values  we  attach  to  things  and  the  laws  we  make.  Science  creates 


636  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

new  symbols  for  the  manipulation  of  things  and  events  and  for  the  under- 
standing of  reality.  The  new  thought  constellations,  including  those  concerned 
with  our  own  person,  are  more  and  more  removed  from  the  world  in  which 
we  directly  live  and  feel  pain  and  satisfaction,  the  world  of  the  natural  and 
social  struggle.  But  the  latter  also  forms  a  part  of  our  analysis ;  our  experi- 
ences are  split  by  us  into  parts  and  these  parts  are  shifted  and  similar  parts 
synthesized  into  new  concepts,  which,  as  abstractions,  become  more  and 
more  removed  from  the  original  direct  experiences.  This  thought  world  is 
therefore  different  from  the  directly  experienced  world ;  it  is  a  re-organized, 
a  differently  and  a  better  ordered  world,  which  allows  us  to  a  certain  extent 
to  understand  and  to  master  the  world  of  direct  experience.  The  concepts 
thus  created  are  devices  allowing  us  to  orient  ourselves  under  new  condi- 
tions, without  undergoing  again  all  the  manifold  experiencs  for  which  the 
concepts  stand.  Science  functions  in  an  objective  thought  world,  which  is 
less  emotion-tinged,  less  and  less  actively  involved  in  the  various  phases  of 
the  social  struggle  and  in  the  particular  desires  of  our  individuality.  It  is  the 
world  in  which  also  the  dominating  factors  of  the  egocentric  world  are  studied 
as  to  their  origin  and  nature ;  psychical  goods  and  material  goods  become 
here  objects  of  analysis  and  synthesis.  Imagination  and  its  creations  in 
poetry  and  art  are  likewise  objects  of  examination  and  our  particular 
individuality  recedes  in  importance,  except  that  it  continues  to  function  as 
the  analyzing  and  synthesizing,  and  thus  as  the  scientifically  creative  agent. 
Yet,  we  can  use  the  symbols  thus  created  in  modifying  the  frictions  of  the 
egocentric  world  in  an  effective  way;  the  cruelties  of  the  natural  and  social 
struggle  may  become  more  and  more  mitigated  and  the  individuality  sec- 
ondarily gains  in  value  on  a  more  realistic  foundation.  Thus,  by  means  of 
science  we  may,  within  a  certain  range,  learn  to  dominate  our  organism  as 
well  as  our  environment. 

The  scientist  enjoys  his  creative  work,  plays  with  his  thought  symbols, 
just  as  the  poet,  artist  and  musician  play  with  imaginative  thoughts,  colors, 
shapes  and  sounds ;  they  all  abstract  from  the  whole  reality  as  it  is  directly 
experienced  and  select  only  certain  parts  of  the  latter.  The  poet,  artist  and 
musician  create  things  that  are  meant  to  supply  and  maintain  or  elevate 
directly  or  indirectly  the  value  of  psychical  goods  in  the  natural  and  social 
struggle,  and  thus  to  sustain  and  elevate  the  struggling  and  suffering  indi- 
vidual. But  the  scientist,  playing  likewise,  creates  a  thing  that  becomes  his 
master,  is  independent  of  the  direct,  primitive  experience  of  the  individual 
and  of  his  struggles.  It  dominates  the  investigator,  who  finds  himself  more 
and  more  limited  by  his  own  creation,  the  thought  structure,  which  is  science. 
His  erection  of  these  thought  structures  represents  a  vital  process,  in  which 
imagination  is  an  important  instrument,  yet  which,  as  far  as  the  influence 
of  the  created  concepts  reaches,  restricts  his  imagination ;  it  limits  him  in 
shaping  his  life,  his  picture  of  reality  in  accordance  with  his  wishes  and  in 
accordance  with  his  imagination.  However,  even  into  the  building  up  of 
science  egocentric  tendencies  penetrate.  The  analysis  of  those  elements  of 
which  the  outer  world  is  constituted  makes  possible  a  mastery  of  this  world ; 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  637 

but  the  knowledge  thus  gained  is  used  in  the  social  and  natural  struggle, 
not  only  for  helpful  but  also  for  destructive  purposes.  Similarly,  biological 
concepts  are  employed  not  only  for  the  alleviation  of  the  cruelties  of  the 
social  and  natural  struggle,  but  also  as  weapons  in  the  social  struggle,  which 
serve  to  aggravate  the  latter  and  to  introduce  into  it  added  cruelties  and  to 
intensify  the  unbalance  of  the  mind  as  well  as  of  the  body.  Thus  the  science  of 
genetics  in  its  applied  form  as  eugenics  has  been,  in  certain  instances,  used  by 
scientists  themselves,  as  well  as  by  others,  in  the  interest  of  nationalistic  tenden- 
cies in  a  struggle  for  distinctive  psychical  class  goods  and  for  economic  ad- 
vantages. 

The  same  tendency  reveals  itself  in  still  other  ways.  There  are  certain 
concepts  which  play  a  great  role  in  the  social  struggle  and  in  the  adaptation 
to  the  painful  realities  of  the  natural  struggle.  Man  constructed  in  early 
times  the  thought  of  something  which  is  not  subject  to  the  sorrows  and 
destruction  that  we  experience  in  actual  life,  a  spirit  within  us  whose  ex- 
pression is  free  will.  Since  free  will  involves  intention  on  the  part  not  only 
of  ourselves  but  also  of  the  other  individual,  the  exercise  of  it  may  affect 
most  keenly  the  social  struggle ;  whether  we  consider  an  act  as  hostile  or  not 
depends  in  many  cases  not  so  much  on  the  act  itself,  as  upon  the  intention 
which  inspired  it.  The  idea  of  intention, 'furthermore,  is  intimately  connected 
with  that  of  responsibility,  hence  we  mete  out  gifts  to  one  who  is  helpful 
and  virtuous,  and  punishment  to  an  offender.  These  thought-constructions 
represent  an  adjustment,  by  means  of  which  we  uphold  our  individuality  in 
its  more  primitive  needs,  but  at  the  same  time  they  may  lead  to  cruel  re- 
pressions or  to  undue  elevation,  effects  which  often  aggravate  the  social 
struggle.  Into  such  a  mental  environment  of  the  egocentric  world  the  scientist 
is  born,  as  are  other  human  beings,  and  he,  too,  often  upholds  these  concepts 
which  are  active  in  him  as  suggestions.  On  the  other  hand,  the  application  of 
the  concepts  of  science,  based  on  an  increasing  understanding  of  the  springs 
of  human  behavior,  tends  to  substitute  understanding,  prevention  and  cure 
for  punishment  and  suppression,  and  thus  to  mitigate  the  harshness  of  the 
social  struggle. 

Human  life,  then,  may  be  considered  essentially  as  a  struggle  with  nature 
and  as  a  struggle  with  other  human  beings — a  natural  and  a  social  struggle. 
The  natural  struggle  is  a  struggle  for  the  maintenance  of  our  organism, 
which  is  so  constructed  that  it  gradually  deteriorates,  ceases  ultimately  to 
function  and  dies.  It  concerns  itself  with  the  satisfaction  of  material  needs 
in  an  environment  to  which  we  are  only  incompletely  adapted  and  which  only 
by  degrees  we  learn  to  know.  In  certain  respects  there  is  an  antagonism  be- 
tween us  and  nature,  which  ends  with  our  destruction.  At  the  same  time, 
we  interact  with  other  human  beings  and  in  this  interaction  a  complex  social 
structure  has  been  built  up;  to  this  also  we  are  insufficiently  adapted.  Thus 
the  struggle  for  our  preservation,  which  under  more  primitive  conditions  was 
largely  a  struggle  with  nature,  becomes,  over  a  wide  range  of  life,  a  competi- 
tive social  struggle  for  material  goods,  and  there  is  added  to  this,  more  and 
more,  a  struggle  for  psychical  goods.  This  struggle  for  psychical  goods, 


638  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

however,  is  closely  associated  with  the  struggle  for  material  goods ;  it  also 
affects  our  organism  in  its  most  vital  functions  and  is,  therefore,  as  is  the 
struggle  for  material  goods,  ultimately  a  contest  for  the  upholding  of  our 
individuality  in  both  its  bodily  and  psychical  aspects. 

Our  individuality  requires  consideration  and  respect ;  it  needs  appreciation, 
friendliness,  friendship  and  love.  These  are  primary  needs,  which  provide 
a  favorable  mental  medium  in  which  we  can  function  and  develop  without 
fears  and  inhibitions,  and  in  which  certain  fundamental  requirements  in 
social  intercourse  are  satisfied.  We  may  call  the  means  by  which  this  is  accom- 
plished simple  psychical  goods.  On  the  whole,  there  is  the  possibility  of  taking 
care  of  such  general  and  basic  needs  of  all,  and  the  satisfaction  of  the  re- 
quirements of  one  should  not  exclude  the  others  from  receiving  their  share. 
We  can  be  friendly,  courteous  and  understanding  to  everyone.  However,  some 
distinction  sets  in  even  here.  We  cannot  give  friendship  and  love  to  everyone 
to  an  equal  extent.  Certain  individual  distinctions  are  made ;  but  if  they  are 
associated  with  the  giving  of  the  more  common  simple  psychical  goods  to  all, 
with  understanding  and  appreciation  of  all  others,  and  if  the  latter  also  can 
be  supplied  by  those  nearest  to  them  with  the  needed  individual  psychical 
goods  in  the  form  of  friendship  and  love — which  in  a  measure  partake  of  the 
character  of  what  might  be  called  individual  distinctive  psychical  goods — no 
injury  should  result.  Still,  even  then  the  psychical  balance  may  be  imperfect 
and  the  giving  or  withholding  of  such  individual  distinctive  psychical  goods 
may,  in  many  cases,  lead  to  the  bitterest  struggles,  even  within  the  same  family ; 
intense  mother-love  may  become  so  exclusive  that  it  leads  to  bitter  jealousy 
and  to  severe  antagonism  towards  those  with  whom  she  has  to  share  the  love 
of  her  children. 

Of  still  greater  significance  perhaps  as  the  source  of  severe  social  struggle 
are  the  distinctive  psychical  class  goods ;  the  latter  usually  appear  as  social 
caste  spirit,  family  and  race  pride,  and  nationalism.  These  lead  to  destructive 
struggles  of  a  political,  economic  and  social  character.  They  may  end  in  war 
and  revolution.  It  is  of  interest  that  the  struggle  for  these  distinctive  psychical 
class  goods  is  usually  associated  with  a  struggle  for  material  goods ;  these  two 
types  are  intimately  connected,  material  goods  being,  to  a  certain  degree, 
valued  for  the  sake  of  the  distinctive  psychical  goods  they  provide,  while  the 
possession  of  psychical  goods  often  gives  ready  access  to  the  acquisition  of 
material  goods.  Among  the  distinctive  psychical  class  goods,  those  have  an 
especially  devastating  effect  which  make  the  possibility  of  acquiring  these 
goods  a  constitutional,  inherited  condition  in  certain  classes  of  human  society. 
Under  these  circumstances  no  hope  of  improvement  is  conceivable.  More- 
over, the  gain  in  distinctive  psychical  goods  in  some  is  predicated  on  the  lack 
of  them  in  others,  since  if  all  possessed  them  they  would  lose  their  signifi- 
cance as  distinctive  psychical  goods.  The  effects  on  these  others  of  social 
humiliation,  which  is  the  consequence  of  the  social  recognition  of  distinctive 
psychical  class  goods,  are  very  injurious.  They  cause  directly  a  serious  inter- 
ference with  muscular  coordination,  with  expression,  initiative,  controlled 
imagination  and  action,  and  indirectly,  an  interference  also  with  the  functions 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  639 

of  other  organ  systems.  In  the  end,  the  stunting  of  personalities  thus  initiated 
reacts  also  unfavorably  on  those  who  have  been  responsible  for  these  effects. 
Certain  nationalistic,  racial  and  social  caste-distinctive  psychical  class  goods 
are  the  most  prominent  types  of  these  injurious  agents,  in  the  production  of 
which  there  cooperate  human  inventiveness,  the  accidents  of  history  and  the 
desire  for  psychical  self-maintenance,  for  elevation  of  the  personality  picture, 
for  mental  security  and  for  compensation  for  injuries  received  in  the  social 
struggle.  Humanity  stumbled  on  these  social  instruments,  as  it  did  on  some 
of  the  basic  stimulants  and  narcotics;  those  who  had  the  power  made  use  of 
them,  found  them  to  their  taste,  and  their  use  became  general. 

These  functions  and  consequences,  which  apply  clearly  to  distinctive 
psychical  class  goods,  apply  more  or  less  to  all  distinctive  psychical  goods, 
although  their  injurious  effect  is  probably  greatest  in  the  case  of  distinctive 
psychical  class  goods.  There  are  other  types  of  distinctive  psychical  goods 
that  are  more  individual  and  less  injurious,  such  as  recognition,  fame  and 
glorification  of  a  person  who  excels  in  ability  and  creative  work.  Warriors, 
statesmen,  philosophers,  scientists  and  artists  wish  to  have  the  benefit  of  this 
type  of  distinctive  psychical  goods,  which  in  addition  to  other  advantages 
provides  a  certain  type  of  immortality  and  thus  promises  compensation  for 
the  inevitable  defeat  in  the  natural  struggle. 

Ultimately  all  psychical  goods — simple  and  distinctive — which  we  re- 
ceive from  the  outside  become  converted  into  and  contribute  to  the  creation 
of  inner  psychical  goods,  of  thoughts  and  emotion  complexes,  which  we 
cultivate  and  which  sustain  us  in  the  social  and  natural  struggle.  Art,  philoso- 
phy, religion,  science,  principles  in  general,  serve  as  the  objective  material 
of  these  inner  psychical  goods  and,  consciously  or  unconsciously,  they  center 
in  us  around  the  "I"  concept.  From  the  latter  there  develops  more  or  less 
clearly  in  every  person  a  personality  picture  of  himself,  which  is  perhaps  his 
most  precious  possession.  If  this  is  on  a  high  level  and  unchallenged,  the 
whole  organism  functions  relatively  well;  if  it  is  questioned,  attacked  and 
lowered,  serious  consequences  for  the  wellbeing,  mental  and  physical,  of  the 
individual  may  follow.  Thus  the  preservation  and  elevation  of  inner  psychical 
goods,  more  or  less  centering  around  a  personality  picture,  become  the  main 
objective  and  the  principal  agent  in  the  social  struggle  of  individuals  with 
one  another,  and  one  of  the  most  common  weapons  used  in  this  struggle  is  a 
suggestion,  often  attached  to  a  word,  thrown  into  the  system  of  inner 
psychical  goods  of  an  individual,  which  acts  as  an  incompatible  agent  and 
which  tends  to  distort  and  lower  his  personality.  In  different  individuals  the 
character  of  the  inner  psychical  goods  varies,  in  the  same  sense  as  do  their 
convictions,  the  prominence  and  potency  of  their  principles,  the  simple  and 
distinctive  psychical  goods  which  they  have  received,  and  their  inherent 
ability  to  face  the  difficulties  of  the  social  and  natural  struggle.  Suggestions 
which  have  been  given  to  human  beings,  often  in  the  early  years  of  their  life, 
determine  largely  the  character  of  their  inner  psychical  goods  and  their  person- 
ality picture.  Inner  psychical  goods  have  ultimately  the  function  of  steadying 
the  individual  in  his  social  and  natural  struggle ;  and  in  accordance  with  the  de- 


640  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

mands  arising  in  the  contingencies  of  these  struggles  he  may  alter  and  shape  his 
inner  psychical  goods,  add  to  them  or  subtract  from  them,  and  modify  his  per- 
sonality picture.  The  opportunist  or  politician  readily  sells  certain  inner  psychi- 
cal goods,  his  convictions,  principles,  for  the  advantages  of  material  and  dis- 
tinctive psychical  goods.  If  the  personality  picture,  and  in  particular  the  "I" 
around  which  it  centers,  becomes  unduly  prominent  in  all  social  manifestations, 
an  individual  is  judged  to  be  vain.  Very  often  this  is  a  reaction  of  a  compen- 
satory character  in  one  in  whom  social  injuries  make  the  personality  picture 
very  conscious  and  prominent.  Related  to  these  processes  is  the  self-conscious- 
ness frequently  associated  with  painful  discoordination,  also  the  result  of  social 
injuries  experienced  by  sensitive  individuals. 

While,  thus,  simple  psychical  goods  are  needed  for  the  maintenance  of  the 
bodily  and  psychical  organism  in  a  healthy  state,  it  is  especially  the  individual 
distinctive  psychical  goods  received  from  and  given  to  others,  and  above  all, 
the  inner  psychical  goods  that  differentiate  one  individual  from  another,  which 
individualize  human  beings  in  the  highest  degree ;  on  the  other  hand,  distinc- 
tive psychical  class  goods,  even  when  they  serve  as  a  source  of  self-elevation 
and  of  security  and  strength  for  one's  own  individuality,  as  a  rule  tend  to 
submerge  the  individual,  making  of  him  a  mere  representative  of  a  certain 
group. 

Such  are  the  main  factors  underlying  the  social  struggle;  and  they  also 
are  its  objectives.  Which  of  these  objectives  occupies  a  pivotal  position  in 
a  certain  constellation  or  phase  in  the  life  of  a  person  depends  to  a  consider- 
able extent,  although  not  entirely,  on  accidents,  on  suggestions  received. 
This  is  the  foundation  on  which  our  choices  and  decisions  are  made.  Material 
goods  are  so  important  a  factor  in  this  social  struggle,  as  far  as  it  concerns 
the  attitudes  and  actions  of  wider  groups,  largely  because  they  satisfy  the 
most  urgent  needs  and  also  because  they  are  the  least  individualized  and  can, 
therefore,  most  readily  unite  people  of  the  most  divergent  kind.  Psychical 
goods  are  much  more  individualized  and  therefore  can  less  readily  lead  to 
mass  movements ;  but  they  have  done  so  in  the  religious  wars  of  the  past  and 
they  often  do  so  even  now,  as,  for  instance,  in  the  nationalistic  struggles,  and 
when  originators  and  leaders  of  political  mass  movements  are  spurred  on  by 
certain  constellations  of  inner  psychical  goods  or  by  psychical  injuries  re- 
ceived, or  by  an  overwhelming  desire  for  power  and  distinction  rather  than 
by  a  desire  for  material  goods. 

The  objectives  of  the  natural  and  social  struggle  affect  the  daily  life  of 
every  individual  and  in  a  twofold  way ;  in  all  his  efforts  his  desire  for  material 
and  psychical  goods,  and  in  particular  also  for  distinctive  psychical  goods, 
enters  as  an  important  motive.  Thus,  in  general,  human  beings  carry  on  two 
kinds  of  activities,  one  objective,  the  other  subjective.  Their  objective 
activity  tends  to  increase  the  available  amount  of  material  goods  and  to  con- 
tribute new  values  to  the  psychical  reservoir  from  which  humans  obtain  what 
is  best  in  their  inner  psychical  goods ;  this  is  an  activity  which  tends  to  in- 
crease the  health  of  body  and  soul  in  the  life  of  an  individual  and  of  the  group. 
In  this  manner  the  values  of  science  and  ethics  are  created.  There  is  added  to 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  641 

this  objective  struggle,  in  which  important  work  of  value  to  humanity  is 
done,  the  subjective  struggle,  which  aims  at  material  goods,  not  for  the 
whole  human  society  but  for  the  individual  and  his  family,  and  at  distinctive 
psychical  goods.  This  second  struggle  is  largely,  although  not  altogether,  a 
competitive  one  for  a  position,  for  profits  in  the  realm  of  material  goods,  and 
for  distinctive  psychical  goods  yielding  recognition,  distinction,  honor  for  the 
individual  and  those  he  represents.  From  a  certain  aspect,  the  struggle  for 
distinctive  psychical  goods  might  be  considered  as  a  competitive  struggle  for 
profit  in  the  sphere  of  psychical  goods ;  but  it  is  not  designated  as  such,  because 
while  the  profit  motive  is  approved  by  public  morality  in  the  sphere  of  material 
goods,  it  is  regarded  objectionable  in  the  sphere  of  psychical  goods ;  here,  the 
aims  should  solely  be  objective.  But  if  we  analyze  human  activities,  we  find 
present  in  all  of  them  the  objective  and  the  subjective  motives.  This  is  true 
of  the  life  of  individuals  pursuing  commerce  and  industry,  as  well  as  of  those 
pursuing  pure  and  applied  science  and  art.  However,  these  two  motives  are 
present  in  varying  proportions  in  different  occupations  and  in  different  indi- 
viduals. 

It  is,  above  all,  the  manner  in  which  this  subjective  struggle  is  conducted 
which  characterizes  individuals.  All  the  psychical  characteristics  and  the 
corresponding  modes  of  reaction  which  distinguish  one  human  being  from 
another  may  be  called  his  personality,  and  it  is  especially  in  the  subjective 
social  struggle  that  the  personality  becomes  manifest.  There  is  still  another 
motive  which  may  participate  in  this  subjective  aspect  of  human  endeavor; 
this  involves  the  desire  to  be  distinct  from  others,  to  be  an  individual  in  the  true 
sense  of  the  word,  particularly  in  the  psychical  field,  in  thinking  and  feeling, 
and  in  creating;  it  is  accompanied  by  the  wish  not  to  imitate  others,  but 
to  express  one's  own  individuality,  to  receive  recognition  for  this  distinc- 
tiveness, and  to  be  accepted  as  an  individual  in  one's  own  right.  The  degree 
of  self-control  and  self-maintenance  and  determination  which  an  individual 
exhibits  in  the  social  struggle  is  a  measure  of  his  "morale."  It  represents 
his  ability  to  resist  the  results  of  injurious  suggestions  which  tend  to  disor- 
ganize his  personality,  depress  his  self  respect,  the  feeling  of  his  strength 
and  his  ability  to  maintain  himself  and  to  be  respected  by  others  and  by  him- 
self. 

To  harmonize  the  various  conflicts  of  individuals  and  groups  in  the  social 
struggle  certain  codes  have  been  established.  Ethics  and  law  have  significance 
as  means  of  such  an  adjustment.  They  represent  balances  that  compare  and 
weigh  two  or  more  contrary  claims  or  needs,  but  these  decisions,  although 
generalized,  are  as  yet  very  imperfect,  because  they  cannot  very  well  include 
in  their  comparisons  and  weighings  the  different  individualities  around  which 
the  needs  and  claims  center.  Ethics,  with  its  concepts  of  justice  and  of  the 
dignity  of  the  individual,  includes  in  its  consideration  also  the  sphere  of 
psychical  goods,  while  law,  with  its  more  formal  concept  of  justice,  pre- 
ponderantly limits  itself  to  the  sphere  of  material  goods  and  bodily  injuries, 
where  comparisons  and  weighings  can  be  made  more  readily  in  an  objective 
manner  than  in  the  sphere  of  the  more  individualized  psychical  goods.  In 


642  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

particular,  such  terms  as  egoism,  altruism,  have  a  meaning  only  in  the  con- 
text of  the  social  and  natural  struggle ;  they  signify  certain  attitudes,  balanc- 
ings between  our  needs  and  those  of  others  in  these  struggles.  It  is  largely 
in  such  a  world  of  varying  conflicts  that  the  individual  lives  and  his  activi- 
ties take  their  course. 

This  world  of  the  social  and  natural  struggle  is  essentially  the  egocentric 
world,  from  which,  step  by  step,  the  objective  world  of  science  has  detached 
itself  in  the  past  and  will  continue  to  detach  itself  in  the  future.  It  is  only 
if  we  consider  the  different  psychical  states  active  in  the  sphere  of  the  social 
and  natural  struggle  as  this  struggle  has  developed  in  the  course  of  human 
history  that  we  understand  some  of  the  characteristic  desires  and  needs  of  our 
individuality,  as  manifested  by  our  wish  to  attain  an  absolute  significance 
and  an  independence  of  time  and  space.  To  accomplish  these  aims  the  in- 
dividual longs  (1)  to  be  free  and  self-determining;  (2)  to  be  unique  and 
constant,  essentially  unchangeable,  a  self-conscious  continuity;  (3)  to  be 
eternal,  and  (4)  to  obtain  appreciation  and  self-justification  in  the  face  of 
attacks  and  criticism,  to  prove  worthy  of  existence  and  to  be  in  harmony 
with  the  laws  of  man  and  of  the  universe.  Let  us  examine  such  needs  and 
desires  and  state  to  what  degree  they  may  rest  on  constants  in  the  human 
constitution  finding  expression  in  the  present  social  constellations  and  how 
far  they  may  be  founded  on  illusions. 

1.  Free  will  and  self-determination.  The  concept  of  psychical  individuality 
implies,  as  we  have  seen,  the  feeling  of  freedom,  the  existence  and  manifesta- 
tion of  a  self-determining  entity,  which  according  to  the  belief  of  many 
assumes  the  character  of  a  spirit  or  soul,  which  is  an  eternal  factor ;  this 
"self"  is  distinct  in  each  person  and  sharply  differentiated  from  the  processes 
underlying  our  machine-like  automatisms,  and  it  presupposes  the  action  of  a 
directing  principle  coming  from  the  inside,  rather  than  a  mechanism  dependent 
upon  the  interaction  between  organism  and  environment  by  way  of  definite 
reflexes  acting  in  preformed  channels. 

That  there  are  fixed  factors  determining  our  actions  we  have  already  dis- 
cussed ;  in  certain  cases  the  automatisms  active  in  thinking  and  in  the  mani- 
festation of  emotions  become  so  evident  that,  under  these  conditions,  we  are 
ready  to  abandon  the  concept  of  individuality.  Thus  the  lack  of  freedom  is 
especially  clear  in  the  hypnotized  person,  or  in  the  person  who,  after  having 
been  hypnotized  and  then  awakened,  carries  out  the  commands  given  to  him 
during  hypnosis ;  others  around  him  recognize  his  lack  of  freedom,  although 
he  is  not  aware  of  it  himself.  A  lack  of  freedom  is  shown  also  by  a  sleeping 
person,  or  by  one  who  is  under  the  influence  of  certain  drugs,  which  change 
his  thoughts,  emotions  and  behavior ;  also  by  the  insane.  The  thoughts  of  in- 
dividuals suffering  from  the  same  type  of  mental  disease  may  be  very  similar 
in  character  and  only  slightly  or  hardly  at  all  individualized.  A  further  evi- 
dence of  automatism  is  furnished  by  cases  of  a  split  or  double  personality, 
where  normally  connecting  memories  are  conspicuously  disconnected  at  a 
certain  point,  although  in  reality  every  individual  has  a  multiple  personality 
dependent  on  the  existence  within  him  of  mutually  incompatible  suggestions, 


•INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  643 

tendencies,  principles;  between  such  incompatibilities  he  is  constantly  balanc- 
ing, at  one  time  one,  and  at  another  time  another  of  these  factors  predominat- 
ing. Our  feeling  of  freedom  and  self-determination  depends  upon  this  finely 
balanced  system  of  thoughts  with  which  we  adjust  ourselves  to  conditions  in 
an  ever-changing  environment.  It  depends,  too,  upon  a  certain  continuity  in 
thought;  the  thoughts  of  one  moment  must  be  remembered  in  the  following 
period  and  must  manifest  a  certain  degree  of  consistency.  We  may  lose  the 
feeling  of  freedom  in  the  case  of  ourselves  and  of  others  as  soon  as  this  finely 
balanced,  connected  system  of  thoughts  and  emotions  is  interfered  with, 
owing  to  abnormalities  in  the  functioning  of  the  organism. 

Thus,  although  the  lack  of  freedom  and  the  automatic  character  of  human 
behavior  may  be  evident  to  us  under  certain  conditions,  for  the  most  part,  we 
largely  ignore  the  factors  determining  our  reactions,  and  they  are  indeed 
mostly  unknown  to  us.  We  live,  think  and  act  in  accordance  with  the  require- 
ments of  the  situations  which  we  meet.  The  interactions  between  the  situations 
and  our  organism  and  our  responses  remain  largely  unanalyzed.  Even  if  we 
should  be  aware  of  them,  as  a  rule  we  abstract  from  this  knowledge  in  the 
process  of  living.  Here  we  feel  we  are  free. 

2.  Continuity  and  consistency  in  individuality.  We  need  not  only  the  feel- 
ing of  inner  freedom  and  self-determination,  we  also  need  a  feeling  of 
continuity  and  self-consistency.  These  needs  are  intimately  connected  with 
each  other  and  they  both  depend  upon  the  interlocking  of  thoughts,  the  un- 
interruptedness  of  memory  which  joins  the  experience  of  one  time-unit  with 
those  of  the  following,  which  creates  a  connected  texture  cf  remembered 
sensations,  feelings,  thoughts  and  wills. 

In  our  changing  environment,  amidst  the  varying  conditions  under  which 
we  live,  we  have  principles  which  as  such  remain  fixed,  in  contrast  with  the 
shifting  manifestations  and  expressions  of  these  principles.  We  have  conscious 
thoughts  which  direct  us  in  our  aims  and  we  have  memories  of  ourselves. 
When  we  become  aware  of  abnormal,  irrational  reactions  within  us,  we  try 
to  make  them  accord  with  our  directing  thoughts  and  principles.  These  latter 
attempt  to  co-ordinate  all  our  thoughts  into  one  consistent  whole,  which 
centers  around  the  "I."  Our  individuality  is  conceived  of  as  being  more  than 
merely  a  peculiarly  constituted  mosaic  of  factors,  all  of  which  may  exist  also 
in  others,  although  in  different  arrangements  and  with  different  degrees  of 
intensity;  the  picture  of  ourselves  as  a  coordinated,  rational  personality  be- 
comes fixed  in  our  mind,  notwithstanding  the  changes  which  take  place  in 
our  body  and  in  our  thoughts  continually.  Thus  we  live  in  a  world  of  illusion, 
since  in  reality  we  are  subject  to  a  continuous  change.  Furthermore  our  dis- 
tinctions as  to  what  is  our  own  and  derived  from  the  inside  and  what  is  derived 
from  our  environment  are  quite  generally  erroneous.  We  attribute  to  things 
within  us,  to  our  individuality,  what  is  really  of  external  origin,  such  as  the 
suggestions  which  have  acted  on  us  and  influenced  our  behavior.  Quite  com- 
monly we  believe  that  reflex  actions,  having  their  beginning  outside  of  us, 
originate  within  us  if  the  afferent  parts  of  the  reflex  arc  remain  hidden  from 
us.  Thus  we  may  hold  ourselves  responsible  for  actions  of  an  automatic  char- 


644  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

acter.  On  the  other  hand,  we  often  attribute  to  the  outside  and  we  blame  others 
for  what  is  essentially  determined  by  our  own  inherited  and  acquired  consti- 
tutions. 

Our  mental  processes,  and  in  particular  the  thoughts  concerned  with  our- 
selves, function  in  a  definite  mental  milieu,  in  a  medium  of  nerve  and 
endocrine  gland  activity,  to  which  we  are  accommodated.  We  have  adapted 
ourselves  to  a  certain  intensity  of  feeling,  energy  or  lassitude,  to  a  certain 
kind  of  emotional  reaction,  to  a  certain  mode  of  thinking  and  rhythm  of 
reactions  taking  place  within  ourselves  and  within  others.  In  this  milieu  we 
feel  at  home;  it  is  here  that  we  are  accustomed  to  direct  our  thoughts,  our 
movements,  to  talk  and  to  respond  to  other  persons.  If  these  processes  take 
place  smoothly,  we  do  not  especially  become  aware  of  ourselves,  of  the  control 
we  exert  over  ourselves  and  we  take  the  continuity  of  our  personality  for 
granted.  We  do  not  usually  notice  very  gradual  and  connected  changes.  But 
if  our  milieu  is  abruptly,  acutely  changed,  our  reactions  are  changed  in  a 
sudden  way.  also;  thus,  under  unfavorable  environmental  conditions,  under 
the  influence  of  drugs,  in  sickness,  we  may  become  tense,  irritable,  involved  in 
conflict  with  others  and  with  ourselves.  Our  usually  self-controlling  thoughts 
cannot  at  once  accommodate  themselves  to  the  altered  organism  on  which 
they  have  to  act ;  they  find  different  effects,  different  responses ;  there  is  an 
interference  with  our  personality,  a  disturbance  in  our  continuity,  a  rift 
within  us. 

Similarly  we  are  accustomed  to  the  set  of  suggestions  in  which  we  live. 
Often  insidious  in  their  action,  these  function  in  a  mild  way  because  we  are 
adapted  to  them,  because  they  have  been  with  us  for  a  long  time.  They  are 
not  considered  as  strange  to  us,  as  an  outside  product  forced  on  us,  but  as 
something  adopted  by  us,  or  as  having  originated  in  our  own  thought  system ; 
they  arouse  no  sensation  of  discontinuity  in  our  self-directing  personality. 
But  if  we  receive  a  sudden  command,  then  we  react  to  it  as  an  interference 
and  as  opposed  to  us.  This  changed  situation  is  no  longer  compatible  with 
our  feeling  of  freedom,  continuity  and  self-consistency.  The  same  result 
follows  if  forced  thoughts,  new  to  us,  incompatible  with  the  rest  of  our 
personality,  develop  in  us.  Then  the  idea  of  continuity  in  our  individuality 
is  interrupted ;  we  experience  an  interference  with  our  individuality,  especially 
if  under  the  changed  circumstances  our  responses  become  different  and  un- 
controlled. However,  should  other  disturbing  factors  interfere  also  with 
our  ability  to  reason,  to  analyze,  then  the  consciousness  of  cleavage  and  of 
discontinuity  in  our  personality  may  be  lacking. 

But  under  normal  conditions  we  have  the  feeling  that  we  are  constant  in 
a  changing  world.  We  have  an  intimate  acquaintance  with  our  environment, 
we  have  the  knowledge  of  what  to  expect  in  it ;  there  is  a  certain  permanence 
from  day  to  day  in  our  bodily  organism  and  it  is  distinct  from  other  organ- 
isms. Thus  we  are  satisfied  that  our  individuality  is  continuous,  forming  one 
definite  entity,  that  there  is  identity  of  the  self  in  one  moment  with  the  self 
of  the  past  and  of  the  future. 

And  furthermore,  the  individual  himself,  as  well  as  those  around  him, 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  645 

attribute  to  his  psychical  individuality  the  character  of  uniqueness  to  a  much 
higher  degree  than  it  actually  possesses.  As  we  have  stated,  also  the  psychical 
individuality  (personality)  is  a  mosaic  in  which  the  constituents  were  acquired 
from  various  sources,  partly  as  inheritance  of  peculiarities  in  the  structure 
and  function  of  certain  organs  from  the  ancestors  of  the  individual,  partly 
through  suggestions  and  thoughts  taken  over  from  other  individuals  with 
whom  he  has  been  in  contact.  Very  little,  as  a  rule,  has  he  himself  contributed 
to  this  mosaic.  What  distinguishes  an  individual  is  the  way  in  which  these 
various  constituents  are  combined  and  accentuated.  The  uniqueness  of  the 
psychical  individuality  is  furthermore  due  to  the  uniqueness  of  individual 
experiences.  And  here  again,  the  individual  experiences  are  not  really  unique, 
but  the  series  as  a  whole,  the  order  in  which  they  are  joined  together  and 
the  relative  significance  of  each  one  of  these  experiences  for  the  individual  may 
be  unique.  The  psychical  individuality  represents,  thus,  a  biological-historical 
system,  in  which  environmental  factors  play  a  very  important  role.  It  is  the 
selection  and  chronological  order  as  well  as  the  intensity  of  the  influences  and 
experiences  which  have  acted  on  the  individual,  especially  in  the  course  of 
his  most  formative,  impressionable  period  of  life — but  also  later — which  help 
to  determine  his  psychical  character  and  his  uniqueness.  But  even  these 
historical  factors  are  not  usually  entirely  unique.  Other  individuals  have 
experiences,  if  not  identical,  at  least  somewhat  similar,  and  the  scientific 
analysis  of  the  effects  of  these  series  of  experiences  on  the  nature  of  the 
psychical  individuality  seems  feasible.  In  contrast  to  the  psychical  individual- 
ity which  thus  represents  a  biological-historical  system,  the  other  two  types 
of  individualities,  one  of  them  based  on  the  character  of  the  various  tissues 
and  organs  and  of  their  combinations,  of  which  in  certain  respects  the  psy- 
chical individuality  really  represents  merely  a  part,  and  the  other  based  on  the 
character  of  the  individuality  differential,  are  purely  biological,  and  much 
more  independent  of  more  or  less  accidental  environmental  factors  and  more 
fixed  and  determined  in  their  nature.  This  genetic  fixity  and  relative  inde- 
pendence of  accidental  conditions  characterizes  especially  the  individuality 
differentials,  but  almost  equally  as  much  the  tissue  and  organ  differentials. 

3.  The  permanence  of  our  individuality.  Wre  are  involved  in  a  struggle  with 
nature,  which  we  learn  to  dominate  only  within  a  very  limited  range.  Our 
organism  ages,  becomes  sick  and  dies.  This  natural  struggle  invariably  ends 
in  defeat.  But  the  directing,  apparently  self-determining  agent  in  our  individu- 
ality, that  which  seems  really  characteristic  of  us,  we  conceive  as  imperishable, 
eternal.  We  have  built  thought  structures  expressing  and  justifying  this 
interpretation.  But  even  if  we  do  not  accept  these  views,  still  we  live  essen- 
tially in  the  world  of  our  thoughts,  emotions  and  wishes,  which  are  "we," 
and  these  thoughts  we  feel  are  free,  not  limited  by  the  realities  of  life  and 
nature.  And  in  this  thought-world  we  apparently  continue  to  act  quite  inde- 
pendently of  the  changes  which  actually  take  place  in  us,  of  our  real  fate. 
Thus  we  see  ourselves  as  continuing  to  live  after  our  death  in  the  world 
of  our  thoughts.  We  want  to  transmit  to  the  world  our  thoughts  and  attitudes 
and  change  the  world  into  one  more  suited  to  our  needs,  into  a  better  world, 


646  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

the  idea  of  which  means  something  to  us  although  we  are  no  longer  here  to 
experience  it,  to  benefit  by  it.  Our  children  shall  live  in  our  spirit  and  con- 
tinue in  our  ways  and  lead  our  efforts  to  fruition.  But  even  in  the  face  of 
death  men  also  keep  up  their  petty  ambitions  and  competitive  self  assertion. 
The  individual  has  lived  and  may  still  continue  to  live  in  a  thought-world, 
which  does  not  take  heed  of  his  waning  powers  nor  of  the  mortal  disease  which 
may  affect  him ;  these  changes  often  do  not  tend  to  enter  as  real  constituents 
into  the  construction  of  his  mind.  His  thought-world  may  remain  fixed  and 
he  does  not  foresee  an  end  to  it. 

4.  Self-justification  of  our  individuality.  The  individual  lives  in  a  struggle 
with  nature  and  with  his  social  world ;  in  this  struggle  he  receives  injuries  and 
inflicts  injuries.  In  others,  he  sees  himself  and  the  injury  of  others  he  feels 
as  his  own  injury.  There  exist  laws  which  are  disregarded  by  him  and  he 
acts  contrary  to  them ;  he  suffers  from  the  pangs  of  conscience  and  fears 
the  consequences  of  what  he  does.  In  such  a  conflict  he  needs  approval  of 
his  actions  and  his  individuality,  he  needs  justification  for  his  existence, 
absolution  for  his  failures  and  for  his  infringements  of  those  laws  which  are 
believed  to  be  absolute.  And  yet,  in  determining  his  responsibility,  he  often 
attributes  to  himself  what  originated  in  others,  and  to  his  environment  he 
attributes  what  was  his  own ;  even  here  he  is  unable  to  discern  the  real  from 
the  unreal  and,  insofar,  he  again  lives  in  a  world  of  illusions. 

However,  all  these  psychical  reactions  in  human  beings  which  have  here  been 
discussed  and  which  tend  to  express  and  safeguard  their  individuality,  are  not 
elementary  psychical  phenomena,  but  are  conditioned  by  the  social  setting  in 
which  they  occur,  by  the  social  traditions,  customs,  and  ethical  standards  which 
direct  and  control  the  life  of  the  social  groups,  large  or  small,  to  which  the 
individuals  belong.  The  psychical  individuality  as  we  have  just  described  it, 
exists  therefore  only  in  an  advanced  stage  of  human  social  development,  where 
the  sets  of  active  suggestions  are  wider,  more  numerous  and  more  varied  than 
in  the  more  primitive  societies,  but  where  they  are  also  less  firmly  fixed,  more 
accessible  to  influences  which  may  change  them,  where  the  manifestations 
of  the  social  struggle  are  more  complex  and  may  affect  also  the  thought-life 
and  emotions  of  the  individual  to  a  higher  degree,  and  above  all,  where  a 
social  reservoir  of  scientific  and  philosophical  thought  is  available,  which 
may  serve  as  a  source  of  inner  psychical  goods  to  which  the  individual  has 
access.  There  has  thus  taken  place  an  evolution  also  of  the  psychical-social 
individuality;  but  it  is  the  task  of  the  history  of  civilization  to  trace  this 
evolution. 

Individuals  are  the  units  which  constitute  groups.  Groups  of  various  kinds 
are  aggregations  of  individuals  in  which  the  distinctive  characters  of  com- 
ponent parts  are  disregarded  and  characteristics  common  to  all  are  used  to 
distinguish  one  group  from  all  the  other  groups.  In  a  certain  sense,  the  group 
concepts  are  thus  opposed  to  and  destructive  of  the  features  which  constitute 
the  individual.  The  group  concepts  as  far  as  they  concern  man  are  abstractions. 
This  applies  to  all  groups,  whether  nations,  races,  economic  classes,  social 
castes,  or  societies  of  various  kinds ;  also,  whether  they  are  based  on  moral 


INDIVIDUALITY  AND  WORLD  647 

attributes,  beliefs  and  principles,  occupations  and  professions,  family  asso- 
ciations, or  other  personal  relationships  such  as  friendships  and  feuds.  It  is 
essentially  as  members  of  such  groups  that  we  enter  into  communication  with 
individuals ;  we  possess  the  group-suggestions  and  we  may  be  subject  to 
acutely  acting  ones,  such  as  those  manifest,  for  instance,  in  the  mob  spirit, 
and  individuals  are  largely,  to  us,  therefore,  representatives  of  groups,  sym- 
bols of  various  activities,  tendencies,  principles  or  associations  of  human 
beings.  Yet  within  these  groups  individuals  are  distinguished  by  the  possession 
of  special  group  characteristics.  Each  individual  is  a  composite  as  a  member  of 
many  groups  and  these  groupings  are  not  the  same  in  different  individuals.  But 
in  addition,  we  recognize  various  distinctive  signs  of  individuals,  such  as 
structural  characteristics,  movements,  ways  of  speaking,  expressions  of 
various  thoughts  and  emotions  and  special  attitudes  which  distinguish  one 
individual  from  another  and  which  are  partly  independent  of  groups. 

However  it  is,  after  all,  only  a  small  part  of  the  individuality  of  others 
and  of  himself  which  each  person  learns  to  know.  The  meaning  of  individual- 
ity, therefore,  is  based  largely  on  the  subjective  experiences  of  the  individual 
himself,  and  the  knowledge  thus  derived  is  imperfect  and  faulty.  The  recogni- 
tion of  the  distinctive  features  of  the  individual  and  of  the  meaning  of  in- 
dividuality are  problems  with  which  the1  study  of  the  body  and  mind  is 
concerned.  Science  provides  instruments  for  the  analysis  of  the  physical 
and  psychical  mosaic  of  which  the  individual  is  composed  and  makes  possible 
the  investigation  of  genetic  and  environmental  factors  entering  into  his  con- 
stitution. But  science  in  carrying  out  this  analysis  splits  individuality  into 
many  constituent  parts,  which  then  are  joined  together  again  into  new  groups 
or  types  more  significant  than  the  conventional  ones  which  a  more  superficial 
observation  furnishes.  Science  thus  shows  that  what  is  most  significant  in 
individuals  as  separate  entities  is  not  the  elements  of  which  the  individual 
consists,  but  the  mode  and  the  quantitative  manner  in  which  these  elements 
are  joined  together,  and  in  this  sense  it  deprives  to  some  extent  individuality 
of  its  distinctiveness  and  uniqueness  and  it  diminishes  in  man  what  has  been 
considered  as  the  most  characteristic  feature  of  his  individuality. 

As  we  have  pointed  out  earlier  in  this  chapter  there  is  a  far  going  differ- 
ence between  the  psychical-social  and  the  physical-physiological  individuality. 
In  contrast  to  the  physiological  and  physical  individuality  which  is  distinct 
and  sharply  separated  from  the  surrounding  world,  the  psychical  individuality 
forms  in  certain  respects  one  connected  whole  with  its  environment.  The 
evidence  given  in  our  preceding  discussion  has  shown  that  in  the  psychical 
sphere  the  individual  is  not  sharply  separated  from  the  non  living  things 
and  other  organisms.  The  psychical  individuality  is  composed  of  elements 
which  are  interwoven  in  such  an  intricate  way  with  the  world  surrounding 
the  individual  that  it  is  difficult  to  make  a  sharp  distinction  between  those 
elements  which  belong  to  the  one  and  to  the  other.  Moreover  the  intricacy  of 
these  connections  increases  the  difficulty  of  establishing  in  the  actions  of  the 
individual  the  relations  of  cause  and  effect.  If  we  consider  the  fact  that  the 
psychical-social  individuality  depends  largely  on  the  nervous  system  for  its 


648  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

development  and  expression  and  that  the  nervous  system  acts  as  the  agent  and 
representative  of  the  outer  world  within  us  it  can  be  readily  understood  that 
there  is  an  intimate  connection  between  the  psychical  individuality  and  the 
outer  world. 

It  is  these  relations  between  the  individuality  and  the  surrounding  world  as 
well  as  the  relations  which  exist  between  individuality  in  the  physical  and 
physiological  sense  (body)  and  in  the  psychical  sense  (soul)  which  have  been 
the  main  problems  with  which  philosophy  has  dealt  throughout  its  history. 
Therefore  essentially  the  problems  of  philosophy  have  been  largely  concerned 
with  the  meaning  of  individuality. 


Chapter  J 
The  Evolution  of  Individuality 

In  a  preceding  part  we  have  followed  the  evolution  of  organisms  from 
their  primitive  beginnings  to  man.  At  first,  the  organisms  are  relatively 
simple  as  far  as  the  differentiation  of  their  organs  and  the  character  of 
their  organismal  differentials  are  concerned.  They  are  still  very  plastic,  re- 
sponding readily  with  a  modification  of  organ  and  tissue  formation  to  certain 
changes  in  the  environment.  They  also  reproduce  with  ease  lost  parts  of  their 
body,  even  relatively  small  pieces  having  the  power  to  do  so.  Presumably 
this  relatively  great  plasticity  of  the  organs  and  the  relative  simplicity  of  the 
organismal  differentials  are  connected  with  each  other.     * 

With  advancing  evolution,  the  plasticity  of  the  organism,  its  readiness  to 
respond  to  the  environment,  decreases ;  more  and  more  the  organism  becomes 
a  fixed,  closed  system,  in  which  structural  complexity  and  integration  in- 
crease; at  the  same  time,  the  organs  become  more  specialized  and  the  or- 
ganismal differentials  more  differentiated  and  individualized.  The  increasing 
independence  of  the  environment  applies  not  only  to  the  adult  organism,  but 
also  to  the  embryo,  whose  development,  in  the  higher  organisms,  takes  place 
within  the  body  of  the  adult  mother ;  in  this  way  the  influence  of  environmental 
factors  on  development  is  more  completely  excluded.  Within  the  mother's 
body  the  greater  specialization  of  the  organ  and  organismal  differentials  takes 
place,  the  finer  structural  differentiation  and  the  fuller  integration  occur  and 
a  more  individualized  organism  is  formed.  It  is  born  in  a  state  in  which  the 
animal  is  more  or  less  fully  developed  as  far  as  its  structural  characteristics 
are  concerned. 

Concurrently  and  intimately  connected  with  this  increase  in  the  specializa- 
tion of  organ  and  organismal  differentials  and  in  the  individualization  of  the 
organism,  a  greater  refinement  in  the  immune  mechanisms  is  established.  This 
latter  change  adds  still  further  to  the  individualization  of  the  organism  and 
tends  to  transfer  a  greater  part  of  its  reaction  to  certain  environmental 
alterations  from  the  external  world  into  the  interior  of  the  ariimal.  We  can 
consider  the  gradual  refinement  of  the  organismal  differentials  and  of  the 
processes  on  which  their  manifestation  depends,  as  well  as  the  increasing 
delicacy  and  significance  of  the  immunity  reactions,  which  are  largely  based 
on  corresponding  changes  in  the  various  differentials,  as  mechanisms  of 
defense  on  the  part  of  the  organism  as  a  whole  against  interference  from  the 
outside,  and  therefore  as  mechanisms  guaranteeing  the  integrity  of  the  or- 
ganism and  its  increased  independence  of  the  environment.  As  a  result  of 
these  alterations,  there  is  a  change  in  the  circuit  of  relationship  between  or- 
ganism and  environment,  in  that  the  influence  of  the  environment  on  the  or- 
ganism becomes  less  and  the  effect  of  the  organism  on  the  environment  be- 
comes greater  in  the  course  of  evolution.  With  this  increasing  refinement  of 

649 


650  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

individualization  there  decreases  the  potentiality  of  small  somatic  parts  to 
reproduce  the  whole  organism  in  an  apparently  unending  series,  and  corre- 
spondingly, there  decreases  the  potentiality  ito  immortal  life  of  these  parts.  In- 
stead, this  potentiality  to  immortality  becomes  dependent  entirely  on  the 
special  mechanism  of  sexual  reproduction,  which  in  the  higher  organism  is 
of  such  a  kind  that  at  no  time  are  the  sex  cells  exposed  to  the  direct  action 
of  the  environment.  However,  certain  somatic  ceLls  and  tissues  of  these  dif- 
ferentiated organisms  still  retain  their  potential  immortality,  as  exemplified 
in  the  propagation  of  tumor  tissues  in  succeeding  generations  of  hosts  and 
of  embryonal  tissues  kept  in  tissue  culture ;  but  in  these  cases  the  tissues  are 
able  to  manifest  a  potential  immortality  only  if  they  are  supplied  with  an 
environment  in  which  the  complex  substances  specifically  needed  for  their 
growth,  as  well  as  other  needs,  are  experimentally  provided.  They  cannot 
be  propagated  in  the  natural  inorganic  environment,  which  would  be  adequate 
for  the  propagation  of  parts  of  lower  organisms. 

In  this  first  circuit  of  the  relationship  between  organism  and  environment, 
the  evolution  of  individuality  consisted  in  the  development  of  an  organism 
which  became  more  and  more  autonomous,  more  and  more  independent  of  the 
environment,  except  that  it  needed  the  environment  as  the  source  of  its  food 
and  energy.  However,  there  arose  on  the  basis  of  and  closely  connected  with 
this  circuit,  a  second  one,  in  which  the  evolution  went  in  the  opposite  direction. 
Here,  the  increasing  complexity  and  differentiation  of  the  organism  led,  on 
the  contrary,  to  a  more  intimate  interaction  between  the  organism  and  the 
environment.  This  environment  became  increasingly  important  and  it  deter- 
mined to  a  large  extent  the  fate  of  the  individual,  his  ability  to  maintain 
himself  and  to  find  satisfaction  in  his  world.  In  this  second  circuit,  organism 
and  environment  were  connected  by  way  of  sense  organs,  nervous  system  and 
muscular  system,  by  means  of  which  the  organism  acted  again  on  the  environ- 
ment. The  evolution  of  this  circuit  depended  on  the  refinement  of  these 
specific  organs  and  their  organ  differentials.  Thus  the  organism  came  into 
contact  with  a  much  more  extensive  part  of  its  environment  and  the  contacts 
became  more  specialized  and  variegated.  An  early  stage  of  this  development 
was  reached  with  the  production  of  conditioned  reflexes  in  the  interaction 
between  environment  and  organism.  Alterations  occurring  in  the  nervous 
system  as  the  result  of  repeated  stimulation,  made  it  possible  that  simple 
environmental  factors  more  or  less  loosely  or  accidently  connected  with  the 
direct  stimulus,  were  able  effectively  to  replace  the  latter.  Furthermore,  pic- 
tures and  thoughts,  representing  environmental  factors  and  systems  of  such 
factors,  eventually  could  substitute  for  the  environmental  factors  and  systems 
themselves  and  thus  determine  the  mode  of  reaction  of  the  organism.  Thus, 
conditioned  thought  reflexes  developed.  Concomitantly,  a  great  refinement 
took  place  in  the  manner  in  which  the  nervous  system  was  affected  by  these 
outer  and  inner  factors,  and  the  intracerebral  reactions  became  longer-lasting 
and  more  significant.  These  various  changes  left  important  after-effects  in 
the  form  of  memory  and  thoughts ;  analysis  and  synthesis  thus  became  possi- 
ble. 


THE  EVOLUTION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  651 

Thoughts  reproduced  environment,  and  in  the  environment  thus  reproduced 
the  social  environment  became  more  and  more  prominent ;  this  type  of  inter- 
action between  organism  and  environment  did  not,  therefore,  take  place  in  the 
same  rigid  way  as  in  primitive  organisms,  such  as  insects,  but  with  the  crea- 
tion of  thought  so  many  possibilities  of  response  arose  that  the  actions  of  the 
individual  became  very  varied.  At  the  same  time  the  environment  affected 
the  organism  in  a  new  way  through  the  development  of  imagination  and 
suggestion. 

As  a  result  of  these  modifications,  the  apparent  freedom  and  the  greater 
individualization  in  the  psychical-social  sense  of  the  higher  organism  have 
evolved.  In  this  second  circuit  the  environment  influences  and  in  a  delicate 
manner  changes  the  living  substratum  on  which  it  acts ;  it  gains  in  importance 
in  comparison  with  the  inheritable  rigidity  of  the  basic  functions  of  the  first 
circuit.  While  thus  in  the  more  primitive  organism  genetic  conditions  deter- 
mine more  directly  the  behavior,  and  while  also  in  the  highest,  most  complex 
organism,  man,  the  basic  functions  are  essentially  fixed  in  a  rigid  way  by 
genetic  factors,  there  develops  in  man  a  special  mechanism  which  makes 
possible  a  very  sensitive  interaction  between  organism  and  environment ;  in 
this  sphere,  the  environment  becomes  a  factor  of  great  importance  in  directing 
the  behavior  of  the  individual.  In  the  more  primitive  organisms,  individuality 
is  largely  fixed;  in  man  the  psychical  individuality  is  to  a  great  extent 
modifiable,  environmental  in  character.  The  content  of  our  mind  is  given 
us  by  the  daily  experiences  in  life;  in  particular,  by  the  suggestions  of  the 
persons  we  meet,  in  whom  all  these  influences  have  also  entered ;  but  it  is  also 
given  us  by  poets,  artists,  philosophers  and  scientists.  In  this  psychical-social 
aspect  our  individuality  has  become  the  more  modifiable,  the  greater  the  re- 
finement of  the  nervous  system  has  become. 

The  factors  entering  into  human  behavior  have  reached  such  a  degree  of 
complexity  that  the  actions  of  individuals  are  often  unpredictable,  and  the 
illusion  of  indeterminateness  in  Willing  and  doing  arises.  Furthermore,  the 
contacts  between  individual  and  environment  have  become  not  only  much 
more  varied  and  extensive — the  individual  being  in  contact  with  an  ever  en- 
larging part  of  the  universe — but  they  are  also  intensified.  Suffering  and  pain 
of  the  mind  and  elations  have  evolved,  which  had  previously  not  existed.  With 
the  increase  in  the  importance  of  the  central  nervous  mechanism  there  in- 
creased the  anticipations,  the  dread  of  disease  and  suffering  and  of  annihila- 
tion, as  well  as  the  fear  of  the  intentions  and  actions  of  other  human  beings ; 
but  there  developed  also  new  satisfactions  of  wider  visions,  of  deeper  under- 
standing. The  human  organism  is  not  only  shaped  by  the  environment,  but 
more  and  more  it  reacts  against  it  and  learns  to  understand  and  modify  it. 
There  develops  the  pleasure  of  creative,  playful  interaction  with  the  environ- 
ment ;  but  not  only  does  man  interact  with  the  environment,  he  interacts  and 
learns  to  experiment  with  and,  to  a  certain  extent,  to  shape  his  own  psychical- 
social  organism  and  those  of  others.  While  thus,  in  certain  respects,  the  in- 
dividuality becomes  increasingly  pronounced,  in  other  respects,  in  conse- 
quence of  the  more  and  more  intricate  interaction  between  environment  and 


652  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

psychical-social  individuality,  a  separation  between  individuality  and  environ- 
ment, especially  the  social  environment,  becomes  impossible.  Hence  the 
second  circuit  has  been  refined  into  a  modified,  a  third  circuit,  which  leads 
from  the  social  as  well  as  the  natural  environment  to  the  nervous  system,  to 
thoughts  and  suggestions,  and  back  again  to  the  social  and  natural  environ- 
ment. 

In  this  third  circuit  thoughts  and  suggestions  have  been  profoundly  modi- 
fied, not  only  by  the  natural  but  also  by  the  social  environment,  and,  more- 
over, they  have  become  the  more  important  and  powerful,  because  they  did  not 
live  an  isolated,  separate  existence,  but  were  connected  with  systems  of  tradi- 
tions, myths,  philosophy  and  science.  All  of  these  latter  formed  one  whole,  a 
system  acting  as  a  huge  social  thought-reservoir,  which  became  more  and 
more  independent  of  the  individual.  However,  the  individual  not  only  received 
from  this  thought-reservoir,  thoughts  and  suggestions  determining  his  actions 
and  orientation  to  world  and  life,  but  conversely,  he  contributed  to  it  his  own 
thoughts,  suggestions  and  emotional  reactions,  as  manifested  in  the  various 
forms  of  art,  in  science  and  philosophy  and  the  conventions  of  social  life.  In- 
tensified satisfactions  were  felt  in  the  creation  of  concepts  concerning  the 
universe  and  in  victories  won  in  the  social  and  natural  struggle,  and  these 
concepts  entered  into  the  social  thought-reservoir  and  thus  became  the  posses- 
sion of  all,  freed  from  the  index  of  the  individuality  which  had  contributed 
to  their  creation  and  which  was  able  to  create  because  it  had  previously 
received  important  constituents  from  this  common  source. 

At  the  same  time  this  social  thought-reservoir  has  become  the  source  of 
much  suffering  because  of  its  mode  of  origin,  reflecting  as  it  does  our  imper- 
fect manner  of  thinking.  Reality,  the  totality  of  our  environment  in  its  inter- 
action with  our  body  and  thoughts,  is  too  vast  and  too  complex  for  us ;  it  is 
more  than  we  can  manipulate.  We  can  concentrate  at  one  time  only  on  certain 
features  of  it ;  necessarily  we  abstract  and,  subsequently,  parts  which  diverse 
abstractions  have  in  common  are  synthesized  by  us  into  a  new  concept.  Thus 
generalization  follows  abstraction.  Some  of  these  procedures  are  carried  out 
in  a  relatively  satisfactory  manner,  such  as  the  abstractions  and  generaliza- 
tions in  mathematics  and  science ;  and  also  the  more  simple  abstractions  used 
in  ordinary  life,  sensations  such  as  hot,  cold,  red,  blue;  or  comparisons  of 
quantities  of  weighable  substances :  "much,"  "little,"  these  all  are  fairly  satis- 
factory abstractions,  serviceable  and  more  or  less  in  harmony  with  reality. 
But  there  are  many  inadequate  or  false  and  arbitrary  abstractions  and  gen- 
eralizations. They  occur  especially  in  all  those  realms  of  life  where  our  emo- 
tions are  affected,  and  where  the  social  struggle  enters.  This  is  true  especially 
of  many  moral,  political  and  social  concepts,  such  as  those  expressing  ap- 
proval or  condemnation,  those  of  fashions  and  rituals ;  the  fact  that  they  are 
often  purely  arbitrary,  and  not  representative  of  real  and  significant  things 
and  processes  is  not  usually  recognized.  And  some  of  these  concepts  not  only 
represent  inadequate  abstractions  and  generalizations,  but  also  injurious  ones ; 
this  applies  in  particular  to  many  social  concepts  which  serve  as  instruments 
in  the  social  struggle  for  material  and  distinctive  psychical  goods.  All  these 
ideas  enter  the  psychical-social  reservoir ;  here  they  remain,  as  it  were,  frozen 


THE  EVOLUTION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  653 

in  the  form  of  words  and  are  transmitted  from  generation  to  generation. 
They  are  used  as  suggestions  and  give  origin  to  conditioned  thought  reflexes, 
which  are  associated  with  a  certain  environment.  This  system  of  thought 
reflexes,  with  the  accompanying  emotions  and  the  psychical-social  environ- 
ment, forms  then,  one  whole;  it  carries  injuries  and  pain.  From  this  reservoir 
in  general,  we  receive  our  instruments  in  the  social  struggle ;  we  may  leave 
unchanged  what  we  have  taken  and  give  it  back  again  with  all  its  inherent 
imperfections ;  or  we  may  add  new  imperfections  by  using  concepts  faultily 
in  the  social  struggle.  Only  gradually  and  very  slowly  is  a  modification  of 
the  thought-reservoir  accomplished  through  the  psychical  reactions  of  in- 
dividuals who  suffer,  and  these  may  find  expression  in  the  work  of  poets, 
philosophers  and  scientists;  also  through  the  play  of  mind  which  leads  to 
the  creation  of  new  ideas. 

However,  the  social  thought-reservoir  acquires  an  additional  significance 
for  us.  In  seeking  for  something  to  take  the  place  of  the  absolute,  yet  some- 
thing to  which  we  may  fix  our  aims  and  motives  and  which  provides  more  than 
a  satisfaction  of  our  passing  needs,  something  which  is  lasting  and  independ- 
ent of  the  changing  and  ephemeral  in  us  and  in  things  around  us,  we  turn 
to  this  thought-reservoir  in  our  search  for  a  constant  in  the  universe  and  in 
man;  we  attempt  to  convert  it  into  a  trustworthy  source  of  our  valuations 
and  principles  and,  therefore,  also  of  our  inner  psychical  goods.  To  build 
it  up,  make  it  consistent,  to  extend  it,  so  that  it  becomes  more  and  more 
universal  in  the  course  of  time,  we  conceive  as  our  highest  task.  In  these 
efforts  there  begins  to  develop,  step  by  step,  a  common,  general  reservoir  for 
all  humanity,  instead  of  the  many  particularistic  group  reservoirs  which  had 
originally  existed. 

Our  psychical-social  individuality,  representing  combinations  of  thoughts, 
wishes  and  wills,  accompanied  by  emotions  and  functioning  within  the  frame- 
work of  the  body — the  elementary  organ  systems — with  the  aid  of  the 
nervous  system  and  of  the  system  of  hormones,  represents  thus  something 
intermediate  between  our  bodily  organism  and  the  social  thought-reservoir. 
It  takes  its  origin  in  the  body  and  reaches  out  into  this  reservoir,  which  is 
common  to  all  but  with  which  we  each  have  our  individualized  contacts. 
Within  this  reservoir  is  that  which  is  relatively  constant,  but  constant  only 
as  compared  with  the  fleeting  existence  of  the  individual.  The  individual 
varies  and  disintegrates,  but  our  social  thought-reservoir  appears  lasting,  the 
depository  of  fixed  values.  Here  is  what  remains  of  the  individual,  what  he 
took  from  it  and  what  he  added  to  it.  The  psychical-social  individual  to  a 
large  extent  consists  of  things  borrowed  from  this  reservoir,  and  to  it,  in  the 
pain  of  the  natural  and  social  struggle,  he  joins  his  fortunes.  Here  he  deposits 
his  discoveries,  thoughts  and  principles,  to  which,  if  possible,  he  adds  his 
individual  name,  so  that  in  the  reservoir  he  may  live  when  his  physical  self 
has  died ;  at  the  same  time  in  so  doing  he  eliminates  his  individuality  as  much 
as  he  can  from  the  social  struggle  and  disappears  in  the  impersonal,  the 
unselfish,  in  the  realm  of  lasting  principles  where  all  individual  pain  and 
individual  desires  end. 

Thus  a  fourth  and  shorter  circuit  has  developed  as  the  latest  phase  in  the 


654  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

evolution  of  individuality ;  it  connects  the  individual  with  the  social  thought- 
reservoir  and  from  there  leads  back  to  the  individual.  These  relations  of  the 
individual  to  the  thought-reservoir  were  used  by  man  in  an  attempt  to  regain 
the  potential  immortality  which,  in  the  sphere  of  the  first  circuit,  had  been 
lost  with  advancing  evolution,  and  thus  to  obtain  compensation  for  the  injuries 
and  destruction  experienced  in  the  social  and  natural  struggle.  But  this  effort 
is  in  vain.  The  thought-reservoir  reflects  the  world,  the  social  environment, 
life  as  a  whole,  and  in  making  connections  with  it  a  part  of  the  psychical 
individuality  is  sacrificed.  This  last  circuit  represents  the  highest  point,  the 
last  phase  in  the  evolution  of  individuality,  the  latter  entering  into  that  which 
is  common  to  all  and  thus  in  part  giving  up  its  separate  existence. 

Yet,  while  the  individual  lives  and  struggles,  the  social  thought-reservoir 
exerts  a  real  function  in  his  activities.  It  has  a  steadying,  stabilizing  effect  on 
him  and  it  may  restrict  the  excesses  in  which  his  personality  may  express 
itself.  Thus  he  is  limited,  is  made  less  free,  but  at  the  same  time  it  renders 
the  individual,  in  his  sensory-nervous-muscular  circuit,  less  dependent  on  the 
environment.  It  brings  continuity  into  his  reactions,  which  are  then  deter- 
mined not  solely  by  momentary  impressions  and  responses,  but  by  thoughts 
and  traditions  acting  as  relative  constants,  as  principles  in  an  ever  changing 
world  and  life.  In  this  manner  a  development  is  achieved  in  the  psychical- 
social  sphere,  not  unlike  that  acquired  in  the  first,  the  primary  circuit,  which 
latter  results  in  the  building  up  of  a  very  differentiated  system,  more  and 
more  detached  from  and  independent  of  the  environment,  a  process  charac- 
terized by  such  conditions  as  homoiothermia,  homoiohydria,  homoiotonia,  and, 
in  general,  by  what  has  been  called  by  Cannon,  homoiostasis.  Corresponding 
to  this  latter  development,  there  has  resulted  from  the  evolution  of  the 
thought-reservoir  and  from  its  interaction  with  the  individual  a  kind  of 
psychical  homoiostasis,  in  which  the  psychical  individuality  is  weighted 
down,  anchored  and  fixed  to  something  that  holds  it  firm  in  the  movements 
and  struggles  of  existence. 

There  has  thus  taken  place  an  evolution  of  two  types  of  individuality.  The 
first  is  connected  with  the  differentiation  of  the  organ  differentials  and  with 
the  evolution  of  the  individuality  differential  and  its  manifestations,  from  a 
very  primitive  character  to  the  state  of  great  refinement  reached  in  mammals. 
The  second  is  connected  with  the  evolution  of  the  psychical-social  factors, 
leading  to  the  gradual  creation  and  refinement  of  the  indivdual  in  the  psychi- 
cal-social sense.  This  second  evolutionary  process  is  related  only  indirectly 
to  the  development  of  the  individuality  differentials ;  it  depends  directly  upon 
the  increasing  complexity  and  refinement  of  certain  organ  differentials,  espe- 
cially of  the  nervous  system.  There  is,  therefore,  no  perfect  parallelism  between 
these  two  evolutionary  processes.  While  in  the  first  process  a  gradual,  step-by- 
step  development  of  the  individuality  differential  occurs,  in  the  second  process 
the  most  important,  far-reaching  change  has  taken  place  suddenly  in  the  tran- 
sition from  anthropoid  apes  to  man. 

Corresponding  in  certain  respects  to  the  types  of  circuits  which  connect 
the  individual  and  his  environment  four  stages  may  be  distinguished  in  the 


THE  EVOLUTION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  655 

evolution  of  the  psychical  individuality:  (1)  The  most  primitive  stage  is 
represented  by  that  of  the  simple  reflex  mechanisms,  to  which  the  simple 
conditioned  reflex  is  added  as  an  important  extension.  The  action  of  hormones 
may  further  complicate  this  mechanism.  (2)  Superimposed  upon  this  stage  is 
the  one  in  which  there  are  active  more  or  less  isolated,  disconnected  pictures 
of  things  and  events,  developing  in  response  to  the  needs  of  the  moment; 
they  may  become  memories  and  may  direct  actions.  (3)  In  a  third  stage, 
thoughts  which  represent  simple  abstractions  are  produced.  These  may  exert 
their  effects  as  suggestions,  extending  from  others  to  ourselves ;  or  as  auto- 
suggestions originating  within  us.  It  is  partly,  or  perhaps  largely,  by  means 
of  auto-suggestions  that  our  thought  determine  our  present  and  our  intended, 
our  future,  actions  and  attitudes.  (4)  The  highest  stage  is  reached  with  the 
functioning  of  extended,  conscious  and  rational  thoughts  which  then  may 
affect  our  actions  and  attitudes.  The  further  development  of  the  psychical 
individuality  coincides  with  the  history  of  civilization.  In  the  evolution  from 
the  first  to  subsequent  stages  the  directness  of  the  relationship  between  the 
organism  and  the  environment  decreases ;  more  and  more  there  are  placed 
between  the  two,  psychical  factors ;  and,  concomitantly,  the  contact  with  and 
the  understanding  of  the  environment  enlarges  and  deepens.  Thus,  in  the 
interaction  between  our  psychical  individuality  and  the  outer  world,  con- 
stituents of  the  latter  play  a  greatly  predominating  role,  so  that  the  relative 
importance  of  external  factors  and  of  inner  factors  in  the  functioning  of 
the  organism  becomes  entirely  different.  The  essential  content  of  what  we 
call  "mind"  is  composed  of  things  given  us  from  the  outside,  from  the  non- 
living environment,  and,  above  all,  from  the  living,  social,  human  environment. 
While  the  simple  reflex  action  is  largely  of  the  same  kind  in  all  individuals 
of  the  same  species,  with  increasing  psychical  development  and  especially 
with  the  development  of  analytic  thought,  the  differentiation  between  individ- 
ual organism  is  greatly  increased  and  real  psychical  individualities  are  created. 

But  while  the  dependence  of  our  personality  on  the  environment,  and 
especially  on  the  social  environment,  becomes  greater,  at  the  same  time  con- 
sistency of  thought  and  the  building  up  of  a  social  thought-reservoir,  with 
which  we  enter  into  increasingly  intimate  connection,  cause  our  individuality 
to  become  more  fixed,  steady,  independent  of  the  environment,  which,  on  the 
contrary,  we  now  begin  to  modify  and  to  shape  more  and  more  in  accordance 
with  our  desires ;  and  this  environment,  on  which  we  are  able  to  act  and  which 
we  can  alter,  includes  in  certain  respects  our  own  organism,  in  the  bodily 
as  well  as  in  the  psychical-social  sense. 

These  various  circuits,  which  develop  as  steps  in  the  evolution  of  individ- 
uality, remain  connected  with  one  another  in  a  more  or  less  intimate  manner. 
The  later  circuits  are  superimposed  upon  and  depend  for  their  existence  and 
function  upon  the  primary  circuit,  which  is  the  basic  one.  While  the  latter 
gives  thus  to  the  more  complex,  higher  circuits  the  possibility  of  maintenance, 
development  and  of  further  evolution,  while  changes  occurring  in  the  primary 
circuit  affect  all  the  higher  circuits,  and  while,  in  particular,  its  derangement 
causes  serious  interference  with  the  function  of  the  higher  circuits,  there 


656  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

takes  place  also  the  reverse  interaction,  inasmuch  as  the  character  and  func- 
tioning of  the  higher  circuits  in  which  thoughts  more  and  more  predominate, 
affects  very  potently  the  character  and  normal  function  of  the  primary 
circuit. 

As  a  result  of  this  evolution  of  individuality,  suffering,  injuries,  pains  and 
satisfactions  are  multiplied,  intensified  and  individualized;  and  all  these  ex- 
periences in  the  psychical-social  sphere  affect  also  the  primary  individuality 
as  manifested  in  the  first  circuit,  the  effects  of  psychical  experience  becoming 
very  far-reaching  and  important  for  the  organism  as  a  whole.  More  and 
more,  psychical  experiences  come  to  depend  on  intricate  social  organizations, 
on  social  structures,  in  which  the  social  struggle,  the  creation,  acquisition  and 
distribution  not  only  of  material  but  also  of  simple  and  distinctive  psychical 
goods  and  the  state  of  inner  psychical  goods  play  an  important  part.  Thus, 
with  the  increasing  differentiation  and  refinement  of  the  sense  organs  and 
of  the  central  nervous  system  and  with  the  corresponding  development  of  a 
complex  psychical  and  social  life,  our  interactions  with  the  environment  are 
extended,  our  experiences  multiplied  and  our  living  intensified.  The  psychical 
individuality  which  has  now  been  created,  attempts  to  maintain  and  to 
elevate  itself  and  in  these  efforts  it  collides  with  similar  efforts  of  other  in- 
dividuals and  this  is  one  of  the  principal  causes  of  the  social  struggle  which 
greatly  affects  the  psychical  life  and  may  lead  to  injuries.  Under  these  condi- 
tions there  develop  the  need  and  desire  for  an  adequate  environment,  suitable 
for  bodily  and  psychical  requirements ;  the  individual  is  spurred  on  to  modify 
the  natural  and  social  environment  and  the  social  thought-reservoir,  and  by 
these  means  to  effect  changes  also  in  the  character  of  the  material  as  well  as 
of  the  various  types  of  psychical  goods,  and  so  to  gain  rest  and  security 
for  himself  in  the  natural  and  social  struggle. 

It  is  primarily  by  facing  directly  the  difficulties  and  dangers  in  the  social 
and  natural  struggle,  by  analysing  and  learning  to  understand  these  difficulties, 
that  he  may  hope  to  overcome  them  and  be  victorious  in  these  struggles  as 
far  as  this  is  possible.  Thus  he  may  in  the  end  achieve  for  himself  calmness 
and  strength  and  he  will  give  to  others  understanding.  The  product  of 
analytic  and  generalized  thinking  has  thus  entered  the  social  thought  reser- 
voir; it  lias  become  an  instrument  which  man  uses  and  which  may  be  of 
advantage  to  him  in  the  material  and  social  struggle.  This  advantage  is  now 
accessible  to  all  and  is  no  longer  individual,  but  it  is  enduring  only,  if  the 
underlying  thinking  process  was  sound. 

Others  may  renounce  the  life  of  the  social  and  natural  struggle,  as  far  as 
their  thought  is  concerned;  they  know  the  impossibility  of  actually  overcom- 
ing the  struggle  in  life  and  they  retire  into  a  type  of  thinking  in  which 
thought  is  freed  more  and  more  from  the  disturbing  elements  inherent  in 
the  sphere  of  the  social  struggle.  Thought  reproduces  events,  life  and  world 
instead  of  serving  as  an  instrument  in  the  social  struggle  and  it  also  enters 
the  social  thought  reservoir.  Man  by  means  of  his  thoughts  divests  himself  in 
part  of  his  psychical  individuality  and  identifies  himself  with  the  whole. 

But,  as  indicated  already,  thinking,  especially  when  it  is  concerned  with 


THE  EVOLUTION  OF  INDIVIDUALITY  657 

the  furthergoing  analysis  of  man  and  his  life,  while  it  may  provide  satisfac- 
tion and  in  the  end  give  strength  and  calmness,  may  also  under  certain  condi- 
tions, interfere  with  the  normal  reflex  and  instinctive  processes ;  especially  if 
it  tends  to  reproduce  events  in  the  painful  social  struggle,  these  pictures  may 
have  disturbing  effects  and  be  injurious  to  the  thinking  individual.  Thinking 
in  general  causes  fatigue,  especially  consistent  thinking  that  subordinates  itself 
to  reality  which  it  wishes  to  express,  and  it  is  a  difficult  process.  It  is  due  to 
this  fact  that  in  general  man  avoids  analytic,  objective  thinking  as  much  as 
possible  and  devotes  himself  rather  to  the  processes  of  willing  and  doing,  and 
to  emotional  experiences,  and  the  events  in  the  social  struggle  are  allowed 
to  take  their  course  and  the  serious  consequences  of  this  struggle  may  become 
aggravated. 

Evolution  has  thus  led  to  a  gradual  loss  of  the  plasticity  and  to  an  increas- 
ing differentiation,  integration,  rigidity  and  fixity  of  the  body,  and  asso- 
ciated with  this  process  there  has  developed  an  increasing  individualization 
by  variious  means.  This  development  has  taken  place,  (1)  by  a  refinement  of 
the  organismal  differentials  and  the  creation  of  the  individuality  differentials 
or  by  making  the  latter  manifest;  (2)  by  an  increasing  differentiation  and 
integration  of  the  organ  and  tissue  systems,  and  (3)  by  the  creation  and 
intensification  of  the  psychical  individuality  with  the  aid  of  certain  organ 
systems.  Associated  with  this  increase  in  individualization  and  close  integra- 
tion, deficiencies  have  developed  in  the  organization  of  the  body  which  become 
more  apparent  with  advancing  age  and  in  the  end  lead  to  the  death  of  the 
individual. 

Not  only  the  bodily  organization  but  also  the  psychical  individuality  which 
has  developed  in  the  course  of  evolution  is  imperfect  and  deficient.  This  is 
composed  largely  of  suggestions  which  exist  as  separate,  mutually  dis- 
harmonious constituents  of  the  mind,  whereas  the  integrating  true  thought 
processes,  which  would  be  able  to  unify  these  disconnected  parts  into  one 
consistent  whole  and  to  effect  greater  harmony  between  the  individual  and 
human  society,  do  not  function  adequately. 

Parallel  to  the  evolution  of  the  individual,  the  social  life  as  well  has  under- 
gone a  progressive  evolution.  It  began  with  the  rigidity  of  the  social  organiza- 
tion of  animal  groups,  as  represented  by  the  relations  between  certain 
unicellular  organisms,  by  primitive  colonies,  by  the  essentially  fixed  and 
determined  character  of  insect  societies  and  by  the  less  firmly  knit  social 
organizations  among  vertebrates.  Within  the  vertebrates  a  further  evolution 
in  the  same  direction  has  taken  place ;  it  made  its  greatest  advance  in  the 
change  from  the  social  life  of  monkeys  and  apes  to  that  of  human  beings. 
In  the  latter,  free  imagination  and  thought  even  in  the  restricted  way  in 
which  they  are  active  have  almost  completely  overcome  the  limitations  of 
animal  societies.  Human  society  is  thus  no  longer  fixed,  but  it  has  become  a 
modifiable  state  determined  by  varied  suggestions  as  well  as  by  rational 
thought  and  directed  by  the  needs  and  desires  for  material  and  psychical 
goods.  While  the  simple  and  distinctive  psychical  goods  used  and  valued  by 
human  beings  also  may  have  roots  in  the  psychical  life  of  animal  groups,  they 


658  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

have  undergone  a  much  farther  and  individualized  development  in  man,  in 
whom  the  inner  psychical  goods  have  been  entirely  newly  created.  This  evolu- 
tion has  led  to  the  abolishment  of  those  rigid  modes  of  organization,  which 
characterize  the  different  types  of  animal  societies,  and  has  replaced  these 
by  the  modifiable  constitution  of  human  society  which  is  accessible  to  direction 
by  rational  thought. 

To  recapitulate,  the  evolution  of  individuality  has  taken  place  in  two  op- 
posite directions.  The  body  developed  from  a  state  of  relative  variability, 
which  depended  upon  and  was  to  a  large  extent  directed  by  the  environment, 
to  a  state  of  relative  fixity,  autonomy  and  unyieldingness,  much  less  subject 
to  environmental  conditions.  From  the  point  of  view  of  the  bodily  organism, 
the  inner  constitutional  factors  have  overbalanced  therefore  the  environmen- 
tal factors  to  a  larger  extent  in  the  further  advanced  organism  than  in  the 
more  primitive  ones.  There  then  took  place,  parallel  to  the  evolution  of  the 
body,  the  evolution  of  the  sense  organs,  of  the  central  nervous  system  and 
of  the  psychical-social  mechanism,  in  which  the  environment  again  has  be- 
come of  increasing  significance.  Associated  with  these  two  tendencies  in 
evolution  there  occurred  the  development  of  the  social  struggle  as  a  manifesta- 
tion of  the  greater  importance  of  psychical  activity  and  psychical  needs,  in 
contrast  to  the  natural  struggle,  which  was  primarily  concerned  with  the 
satisfaction  of  the  requirements  of  the  body. 

Thus,  in  matters  which  relate  to  man  as  a  psychical-social  organism,  it  is 
the  environment  which  has  become  a  preponderating  influence  and  which 
largely  determines  his  fate.  To  adapt  the  psychical-social  environment  to  the 
needs  of  man,  so  that  he  can  function  in  the  most  adequate  manner,  is, 
therefore,  the  most  important  task  which  humanity  has  now  to  face. 


Bibliography* 

I.  Books  and  General  Reviews 

Allee,  W.  C. :  The  Social  Life  of  Animals,  New  York,  1938. 

Frank,  Philipp:  Between  Physics  and  Philosophy,  Cambridge,  1941. 

Goldschmidt,  R. :  Mechanismus  u.  Physiologie  d.  Geschlechtsbestimmung,  Berlin, 
1920;  Einfiihrung  in  d.  Vererbungswissenschaft,  Leipzig,  1923. 

Jennings,  H.  S. :  The  Biological  Basis  of  Human  Nature,  New  York,  1930. 

Korschelt,  E. :  Regeneration  and  Transplantation,  Vol.  II;  Transplantation, 
Berlin,  1931. 

Landsteiner,  Karl:  The  Specificity  of  Serological  Reactions,  Springfield,  1936. 

Lexer,  Erich:  D.  Freien  Transplantationen,  Stuttgart,  1919-1924. 

Loeb,  Jacques:  Comparative  Physiology  of  the  Brain  and  Comparative  Psychol- 
ogy, New  York  and  London,  1900;  The  Mechanistic  Conception  of  Life, 
Chicago,  1912;  The  Organism  as  a  Whole,  New  York  and  London,  1916. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  and  Individuality,  Biol.  Bull.  40:  143,  1921;  Physiol. 
Reviews  10:  547,  1930;  The  Biological  Basis  of  Individuality,  Science,  86: 
1,  1937. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Causes  and  Nature  of  Cancer,  Am.  J.  Med.  Sc,  159:  781,  1920.  Acta, 
Union  Internat.  Contre  Cancer  2:  148,  1937;  Journal  National  Cancer  In- 
stitute, 1 :  169,  1940. 

Loeb,  Leo,  and  collaborators :  The  Venom  of  Heloderma,  Carnegie  Institution  of 
Washington,   1913. 

Marchand,  F. :  Der  Process  der  Wundheilung  mit  Einschluss  der  Transplanta- 
tion, Stuttgart,  1901. 

May,  R.  M. :  La  Transplantation  Animale,  Paris,  1932. 

Morgan,  T.  H.,  A.  H.  Sturtevant,  A.  J.  Muller,  and  C.  B.  Brii>ges  :  The 
Mechanism  of  Mendelian  Heredity,  New  York,  1922. 

Morgan,  T.  H. :  The  Theory  of  the  Gene,  Yale  Univ.  Press,  New  Haven,  1926. 

Muller- Freienfels,  Richard:  Philosophic  der  Individualist,  Leipzig,  1923. 

Nuttall,  G.  H.  F. :  Demonstration  of  Blood  Relationship  among  Animals  by 
Means  of  the  Precipitin  Test,  Cambridge  University  Press,  1904. 

Przibram,  Hans:  Tierpfropfung,  Braunschweig,  1926. 

Rensch,  Bernhard:  D.  Prinzip  Geographischer  Rassenkreise  u.  d.  Problem  d. 
Artbildung,  Berlin,  1929. 

Scharrer,  Berta:  Endocrines  in  Invertebrates,  Physiol.  Reviews  21:  383,  1941. 

Schoene,  Georg:  Die  heteroplastische  und  homooplastische  Transplantation, 
Berlin  1912. 

Snell,  G.  D.,  Editor:  Biology  of  the  Laboratory  Mouse,  Philadelphia,  1941. 

Stockard,  C.  R. :  The  Physical  Basis  of  Personality,  New  York,  1931. 

Sturtevant,  A.  H.  and  G.  W.  Beadle,  An  Introduction  to  Genetics,  Philadelphia, 
1939. 

Sumner,  F.  B. :  Genetic,  Distributional  and  Evolutionary  Studies  of  the  Sub- 
species of  Deer  Mice  (Peromyscus),  Bibliographia  Genetica  IX,  The  Hague, 
1932. 

Thorndike,  E.  L. :  Human  Nature  and  the  Social  Order,  New  York,  1940. 

Vochting,  Hermann:  Uber  Transplantation  am  Pflanzen  Korper,  Tubingen, 
1892. 

*  The  following  bibliography  is  very  incomplete.  In  view  of  the  considerable  number 
of  subject  matters  discussed,  reference  to  papers  had  to  be  limited  to  those  articles  on 
which  the  conclusions  presented  in  this  book  are  mainly  based  and  especially  the  articles 
by  the  author  and  his  collaborators  and  a  number  of  representative  articles  by  other 
investigators  are  listed;  but  equally  important  papers  had  to  be  omitted.  However  refer- 
ences to  the  latter  can  be  found  in  the  books,  reviews  or  papers  cited. 

659 


660  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Wells,  H.  G. :  The  Chemical  Aspects  of  Immunity,  New  York,  1929. 

Wilson,  E.  B. :  The  Cell  in  Development  and  Heredity,  III  edition,  New  York, 
1928. 

Woglom,  W.  H. :  The  Study  of  Exper.  Cancer,  George  Crocker  Special  Research 
Fund,  New  York,  1913. 

Wright,  Sewall:  The  Physiology  of  the  Gene,  Physiol.  Reviews  21:  487,  1941. 

Zinsser,  Hans,  J.  F.  Enders  and  L.  D.  Fothergill:  Immunity,  Principles  and  Ap- 
plication in  Medicine  and  Public  Health,  New  York,  1939. 


II.  Papers 


Auderhalden,  E. :  Individual  Biochemical  Differences,  "Lehrbuch  d.  physiol- 
Chemie"  III  edition,  vol.  1  page  376,  1914. 

Adams,  A.  E.,  E.  M.  Deforest  and  B.  Granger  :  Class  Specificity  of  Hormones, 
Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  42:  354,  1939. 

Addison,  W.  H.  F.  and  L.  Loeb  :  Relations  betwe.en  Structure  and  Growth  of  Epi- 
dermis of  Pigeon  and  Guinea  Pig.  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  37:  635,  1913. 

Adelmann,  H.  B. :  Transplantation  of  Neural  Plate  and  Eye  Formation  in  Uro- 
deles,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  54:  291,  1929. 

Adelmann,  H.  B. :  Effect  of  Substratum  on  Heterotopic  Development  of  Neural 
Plate  of  Amblystoma,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  57:  183  and  223,  1930. 

Allen,  B.  M. :  Effect  of  Grafted  Anterior  Hypophysis  on  Metamorphosis  in  Tad- 
poles, Anat.  Record  44:  207,  208,  1930.  Transplantation  of  Thyroid  Anlage 
into  Anuran  Tadpoles,  Anat.  Record,  44 :  207,  1930. 

Alloway,  I.  L. :  Transformation  in  Vitro  of  R  Pneumococci  into  S  Pneumococci 
of  a  Different  Type,  J.  Exp.  Med.  55 :  91,  1932. 

Ambrose,  A.  M.,  F.  W.  Power,  and  C.  P.  Sherwin  :  Phenylacetic  Acid  and  Its 
Mode  of  Elimination,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  101 :  699,  1933. 

Anderson,  R.  L. :  Skin  Grafts  as  Indicators  of  Interspecific  Relationship  in  Tri- 
turus,  Anat.  Record   (Supplement),  54:  60,  1932. 

Anderson,  Katherine:  Adaptive  Changes  in  Herpes  virus,  Science,  90:  497,  1939. 

Andervont,  H.  B.:  Immunity  Induced  by  Mouse  Sarcoma  180,  Publ.  Health 
Reports,  47:  1859,  1932. 

Andervont,  H.  B.:  Influence  of  Trypan  Blue  upon  Resistance  of  Mice  to  Trans- 
plantable and  Induced  Tumors,  Publ.  Health  Reports  51:  591,  1936. 

Andrewes,  C.  H. :  Immunological  Relationships  of  Fowl  Tumors,  J.  Path.  &  Bact. 
34:  91,  1931.  Transmission  of  Fowl  Tumors  to  Pheasants,  J.  Path.  &  Bact.  35: 
407,  1932.  Immune  Sera  Against  Fowl  Tumors,  J.  Path.  &  Bact.  35:  243, 
1932. 

Anson,  M.  L.,  J.  Barcroft,  A.  E.  Mirsky  and  S.  Oinuma:  Correlation  between 
Spectra  of  Hemoglobins  and  their  Affinities  for  Oxygen  and  Carbon  Mon- 
oxide, Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  Ser.  B.  97:  61,  1925. 

Appel,  Fred  W. :  Testes  Grafts  in  Ovariectomized  Fowls,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  53:  77, 
1929. 

Appel,  Max,  O.  Saphir,  M.  Janota  and  A.  A.  Strauss:  Complement-fixing  Anti- 
bodies in  Blood  Serum  and  in  Aqueous  Fluid  of  Anterior  Chamber  of  Eye, 
Cancer  Research  2:  576,  1942. 

Aschner,  M. :  Symbiosis  between  Insects  and  Bacteria;  Mycetoma  Formation, 
Naturwissenschaften  20:  501,  1932. 

Avery,  O.  T. :  Chemo-immunological  Study  of  Pneumococci  Infection  and  Im- 
munity, Naturwissenschaften,  21 :  777,  1933. 

Axhausen,  G. :  Transplantation  of  Bone,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  88:  23,  1909;  Trans- 
plantation of  Epiphyseal  and  Joint  Cartilage,  Arch.  Klin.  Chir.  Ill:  832, 
1919. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  661 


B 


Baldwin,  H.  A.:  Skin  Grafting  and  Blood  Groups,  Med.  Rec.  98:  686,  1920. 
Balinsky,  B.  J. :  Xenoplastic  Transplantation  of  Ear  Vesicles,  Arch.   f.  Ent- 

wicklgsmech.  110:  63  and  71,  1927. 
Ball,  H.  A. :  Effect  of  Intravenous  Glycogen  Administration  on  the  Growth  of 

Transplanted  Cancers,  Cancer  Research  2:  823,  1942. 
Baltzer,  T. :  Chromatin  and  Development  of  Hybrids  of  Echinoderms,  Arch.  f. 

Zellforschg.  5:  497,  1910. 
Barker,  L.  E. :  Effect  of  Proteolytic  Digestion  Products  on  Monocytes  in  Tissue 

Culture,  J.  Exp.  Med.  57:  689,  1933. 
Barnett,  E.  J. :  Species  Specificity  in  the  Production  of  Toxin  by  Woodticks, 

J.  Am.   Med.  Assn.   109:  846,  1937. 
Barrett,  M.  K. :  Anaphylaxis  and  Hemorrhage  in  Transplanted  Tumors,  J.  Nat. 

Cancer  Inst.  2:  625,  1942. 
Bashford,  E.  F.,  J.  A.  Murray  and  W.  Cramer  :  Natural  and  Induced  Resistance 

of  Mice  to  Growth  of  Cancer,  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  B.  79:  164,  1907. 
Bauer,  K.  H. :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Epidermis  in  Identical  Twins,  Beitr.  z. 

Klin.  Chir.  141 :  442,  1927. 
Baskirzew,  N.  J.  and  N.  N.  Petrow:  Transplantation  of  Bone,  D.  Zeitsch.  f. 

Chir.  113:  490,  1912. 
Baumgartner,  Leona:  Age  and  Antibody  Production,  J.  Immunol.  27:  407,  1934. 
Bautzmann,  H. :  Organizer  Action  of  Chordo-mesoderm  in  Triton,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 

wicklgsmech.  114:  177,  1928. 
Bautzmann,  H. :  Transplantation  of  Pieces  of  Organizer  Tissue  in  Amphibian 

Embryos,  Naturwissenschaften  17:  818,  1929. 
Bautzmann,  H.,  J.  Holtfreter,  H.  Spemann  and  O.  Mangold:  Induction  of 

Embryonal    Development,    Naturwissenschaften   20:    971,    1932. 
Bayer,   Gustav,   and  Th.   Wense:   Intraocular  Transplantation  of  Testicle  in 

Rabbit,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  137:  372,  1937-38. 
Bayliss,  W.  M. :  Principles  of  General  Physiology.  London  1915.  (Coalescence  of 

protoplasms,  p.  21.) 
Beadle,  G.  W.  and  B.  Ephrussi:  Transplantation  of  Organs  in  Drosophila  (Gene 

hormones)  C.  R.  Acad.  Sci.  201 :  620,  1935. 
Becher,  H. :  Blood  in  Parabiotic  Rats,  Verh.  d.  Anat.  Gesselsch.  37:  227,  1928. 
Belogolowy,  G. :  Transplantation  of  Eggs  into  Peritoneal  Cavity  in  Pelobates  and 

Rana,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  43 :  556,  1917/18. 
Bensley,  R.  R. :  Chemical  Structure  of  Cytoplasm,  Science,  96:  389,  1942. 
Bergel,   A. :   Homoiotransplantation  of  Tailblastema  in  Rana  Fusca,  Arch.   f. 

Entwicklgsmech.  113:  172,  1928. 
Bergmann,  Max,  S.  J.  Fruton  and  H.  Pollock:  Substance  Specificities  in  En- 
zyme Action  (Pancreatic  Trypsins),  Science,  85:  410,  1937. 
Bergmann,   Max  and  Carl   Niemann  :   Newer  Biological  Aspects  of  Protein 

Chemistry,  Science,  86:   187,  1937. 
Bernstein,  Felix:  Inheritance  of  Blood  Structures  in  Man,  Zeitsch.  f.  induktive 

Abstammgs  und  Vererbungslehre  37:  237,   1925. 
Bert,  Paul:  Transplantation  of  Animal  Tissues,  These,  Faculte  de  medecine  de 

Paris,  No.   118,   1863;  Transplantation  of  Tail  in  Rats;  Effect  of  Various 

Modes  of  Treatment  of  Tissue  Preceding  Grafting,  J.  de  TAnat  et  d.  la 

Physiol.  3:  417,  1866. 
Bert,   Paul:  Recherches  experimentales  pour  servir  a  l'histoire  de  la  vitalite 

propre  des  tissus  animaux,  Paris  1866. 
Birkelbach,  W. :   Nephrectomy  in  Parabiotic  Rats,  Zeitsch.  f.  exp.  Pathol.  & 

Therap.,  8:  465,  1911. 
Bittner,  J.  J. :  Genetic  Studies  of  Transplantation  of  Tumors,  Am.  J.  Cancer, 

15:  2202,  1931;  16:  322,  1932;  17:  699,  1933;  17:  709,  1933;  17:  717,  1933; 

17:  724,  1933;  36:  44,  1939;  J.  Genetics,  29:  17,  1934;  31:  471,  1935. 


662  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Bittner,  J.  J. :  Transplantation  of  Splenic  Tissue  in  Mice,  Public  Health  Rep.  51 : 

244, 1936. 
Blakeslee,  A.  F. :  Susceptibility  of  Colchicum  to  Colchicine,  Am.  J.  Bot,  26:  163, 

1939;  Science  89:  10,  1939. 
Bloch,   Bruno:   Allergy,   Anaphylaxis   and   Idiosyncrasy,   Klin.   Wochschr.,   7: 

1067  and  1113,  1928. 
Blumel,  P.  and  Heinrich  Poll:  Skin  Pattern  and  Mental  Characteristics,  Med. 

Klinik,  24:  1924,  1928. 
Blumenthal,  H.  T. :  Organismal  Differentials  and  Leucocytes  in  Circulating 

Blood,  Arch.  Path.,  27:  510,  1939;  Arch.  Path.,  31:  295,  1941. 
Blumenthal,  H.  T. :  Effect  of  Spontaneous  and  Transplanted  Rat  and  Mouse 

Tumors  on  Red  and  White  Cells  of  Blood  and  Bone  Marrow;  Cancer  Re- 
search, 1:  196,  1941. 
Blumenthal,  H.  T. :  Transplantation  of  Spontaneous  Tumors,  Cancer  Research, 

2:  56,  1942. 
Bodenstein,  Dietrich  :  Pupation  Hormone,  Biol.  Bullet.,  84:  14  and  34,  1943. 
Bohn,  G.  W.  and  C.  M.  Tucker:  Immunity  to  Fusarium  Wilt  in  the  Tomato, 

Science,  89:  603,  1939. 
Bonnevie,  Kristine  :  Skin  Patterns  and  Race  and  Family  Characteristics,  Zeitsch. 

f.  ind.  Abstammungs  u.  Vererbungslehre,  50:  219,  1929. 
Bordet,  J.:  Hemolysins  and  Hemagglutinins,  Ann.  de  lTnstit.  Pasteur,  12:  688, 

1898. 
Borghi,  B. :  Effects  of  Injections  of  Homoiogenous  and  Heterogenous  Leuco- 
cytes, Krankheitsforsch.,  8:  308,  1930. 
Born,  G. :  Union  of  Amphibian  Larvae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  4:  349  and 

517,  1897. 
Bornstein,  A.,  Fr.  Wohlwill  u.  K.  Schorlitz:  Transfusion  with  Heterogenous 

Defibrinated  Blood,  Arch.  Exp.  Path.  &  Pharmac,  127:  253,  1928. 
Borst,  Max  :  Grafting  of  Normal  Tissues,  Brit.  Med.  J.,  p.  383,  II,  1913. 
Borst,  Max  :  Transplantation,  Vol.  I  in  L.  Aschoff's  Textbook  of  Pathological 

Anatomy,  7th  edition,  p.  656,  Jena,  1928. 
Borst,  M. :  Lack  of  Success  in  Homoio  and  Heterotransplantation.  Report,  XII 

Internat.  Med.  Congress,  London,  Oxford  Univ.  Press,  1913. 
Boyd,  William   C. :  Cross  Reactivity  of  Hemocyanins,  Biol.  Bullet.,  73:  181, 

1937. 
Boyden,  A.  A.:  Precipitin  Reaction  and  Animal  Relationship,  Biol.  Bullet.,  50: 

73,  1926;  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  29:  955,  1932. 
Boyden,  Alan:  Serology  and  Biological  Problems,  Sigma  Xi  Quarterly,  24:  152, 

1936. 
Boyden,  A.  and  J.  G.  Baier,  Jr.  :  Precipitin  Technique,  J.  Immunol.  17:  29,  1929. 
Brahn,  B.  and  F.  Schiff:  Complex  Nature  of  Blood  Group  Substance,  A.  Klin. 

Wochenschr.,  5:  1455,  1926. 
Braus,  H. :  Biochemical  Reactions  of  Amphibian  Larvae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech., 22:  564,  1906. 
Breedis,  E.,  T.  Robertson,  R.  S.  Osenkop  and  J.  Furth  :  Sarcoma  Formation 

in  Transplanted  Lung  Tumors  in  Mice,  Cancer  Research,  2:  116,  1942. 
Breuhaus,  H.  C.  and  F.  A.  McJunkin:  Effect  of  Macerated  Kidney  on  Mitot. 

Rate  of  Kidney  Epithelium,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  29:  894,  1932. 
Browman,  L.  G. :  Testicular  Heterotransplantations  in  Rats  and  Mice,  J.  Exp. 

Zool.,  95 :  283,  1937. 
Brown,  J.  B  :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Skin  in  Identical  Twins,  Surgery,  1 : 

558,  1937;  (with  V.  P.  Blair)  Transplantation  of  Skin  to  Defects  Caused  by 

Burns,  Surg.  Gynec.  &  Obst.,  60:  379,  1935. 
Brown,  F.  A.,  Jr.,  and  H.  E.  Ederstrom  :  Dual  Control  of  Certain  Black  Chroma- 

tophores  of  Crago,  J.  Exp,  Zool.,  85 ;  43,  1940. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  663 

Brown,  F.  A.,  Jr.,  and  Allison  Meglitsch  :  Comparison  of  Chromatophorio- 

trophic  Activity  of  Insect  Corpora  Cardiaca  with  That  of  Crustacean  Sinus 

Gland,  Biol.  Bullet.,  79:  409,  1940. 
Bruck,  Carl:  Racial  Differences  in  Human  Blood,  Berl.  Klin.  Wochschr.,  44: 

793,  1905. 
Bruda,  B.  E.  and  H.  Pfeiffer  :  Significance  of  Spleen  and  Reticuloendothelial 

System   for   Immunity   Against   Transplanted   Tumors   in   Parabiotic   Rats. 

Zeitschr.  f.  ges.  exp.  Medic,  68:  116,  554,  1929. 
Bruda,  B.  E. :  Significance  of  Reticuloendothelial  System  in  Transplantation  of 

Tumors,  Centralbl.  allg.  Pathol.,  45:  409,  1929. 
Buchbinder,  L. :  Blood  Grouping  of  Macacus  Rhesus,  J.  Immunol.,  25 :  33,  1933. 
Bullock,  F.  D.  and  G.  L.  Rohdenburg:  Heterologous  Tumor  Grafts,  J.  Cancer 

Research,  3:  31,  1918. 
Bungeler,  W. :  Tumor  Transplantation  in  Animals  Which  Are  Under  the  In- 
fluence of  Colloidal  Substances,  Frankf.  Zeitschr.  f.  Pathol.,  35 :  67,  1927. 
Burgess,  A.  N. :  Reactions  of  Tissues  of  Susceptible  and  Non-Susceptible  Mice 

to  an  Inoculable  Tumor,  J.  Med.  Research,  16:  575,  1909. 
Burns,  E.  L.,  F.  H.  Scharles  and  L.  F.  Aitken:  Specific  Adaptation  in  Inter- 
action of  Blood  Serum  and  Tissue  Extract,  Am.  J.  Physiol.,  97:  233,  1931. 
Burns,  R.  K.,  Jr.  :  Parabiosis  of  Amphibian  Larvae.  Anat.  Record,  31 :  30,  1923 ; 

Transplantation  of  Larval  Gonads  in  Urodele  Amphibians,  Anat.  Record, 

39:  177,  1928. 
Burns,  R.  K.,  Jr.,  and  L.  M.  Burns  :  Growth  of  Whole  Organism  and  of  Limbs 

in  Two  Species  of  Amblystoma  United  in  Parabiosis,  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  53 :  455, 

1925. 
Burr,  H.  S.  and  F.  S.  C.  Northrop:  Electrodynamic  Fields  of  Living  Organisms 

(Individual  specificity).  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sc,  25:  284,  1939. 
Bytinski-Salz,  H. :  Action  of  Xenoplastic  Implants  and  Embryonal  Extracts  on 

Amphibian  Embryos,  Arch.   f.  Entwicklgsmech.,   114:  665,  1929. 
Bytinski-Salz,  H. :  The  Presumptive  Gastrula  Ectoderm  in  Hetero  and  Zeno- 

transplantations  in  Amphibia,  Arch.   f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  114:  593,  1929. 
Bytinski-Salz,  H. :  The  Ability  of  the  Posterior  Areas  of  Medullary  Plate  to 

Function  as  Organizer,  Arch.  f.  Entwickglsmech.,  123:  518,  1931. 


Campbell:  Psychiatry  and  General  Practice,  J. A.M. A.,  112:  2577,  1939. 

Cannon,  P.  R.,  R.  B.  Baer,  F.  L.  Sullivan  and  I.  E.  Webster:  Reticulo- 
endothelial System  and  Formation  of  Antibodies.  J.  Immunol.,  17:  441,  1929. 

Cannon,  P.  R. :  Antibodies  and  Protein  Reserves,  J.  Immunol.,  44:  107,  1942. 

Carnot,  P.  et  C.  Deflandres:  Transplantation  of  Pigmented  Skin  in  Guinea 
Pigs,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  48:  178,  430,  1896. 

Carrel,  Alexis  and  C.  C.  Guthrie:  Anastomoses  of  Blood  Vessels  and  Trans- 
plantation of  Kidney,  J.A.M.A.,  47:  16  and  48,  1906.  Amputation  of  Thigh 
with  Retransplantation,  Am.  J.  Med.  Sc,  81 :  297,  1906. 

Carrel,  Alexis  :  Double  Nephrectomy  and  Reimplantation  of  a  Kidney.  Arch.  f. 
Klin.  Chir.,  88:  379,   1909. 

Carrel,  Alexis  :  Transplantation  of  Blood  Vessels,  Organs  and  Limbs,  J.A.M.A., 
51:  1662,  1908;  Remote  Results  of  Retransplantation  of  Kidney  and  Spleen. 
J.  Exp.  Med.,  12:  146,  1910. 

Casey,  A.  E. :  Enhancement  of  Malignancy  in  Brown-Pearce  Rabbit  Tumor,  Proc. 
Soc  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  29:  816,  1932;  A  Species  Limitation  of  an  Enhanc- 
ing Material  Derived  from  a  Mammalian  Tumor,  Proc.  Soc  Exp.  Biol.  & 
Med.,  30:  674,  1025,  1933. 

Celakowsky,  L.  W. :  Phagocytosis  of  Substances  by  Plasmodia  of  Myxomycetae. 
Flora  76:  182,  1892  (Erganzgsband). 


664  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Celler,  H.  L.  and  F.  Hamburger:  Specific  Antibody  Formation  after  Feeding 
Protein,  Wien.  Klin.  Wochschr.,  18:  271,  1905. 

Chambers,  H.,  G.  M.  Scott  and  S.  Russ:  Action  of  X-rays  upon  Transplanta- 
tion of  Spontaneous  Carcinoma  of  Rat,  J.  Path.  &  Bact,  23:  384,  1919-20. 

Chambers,  H.  and  G.  M.  Scott:  Immunity  to  Jensen  Rat  Sarcoma  J.  Path.  & 
Bact,  35 :  283,  1932. 

Chase,  M.  W. :  Inheritance  of  Susceptibility  to  Skin  Sensitization,  J.  Exp.  Med., 
73:  7U,  1941. 

Cheever,  F.  S.  and  H.  R.  Morgan:  Intraocular  Inoculation  of  Brown-Pearce 
Carcinoma  and  Tumor  Immunity,  Cancer  Research,  2:  675,  1942. 

Child,  C.  M. :  Senescence  and  Rejuvenescence,  Univ.  of  Chicago  Press,  Chicago, 
1915. 

Christiani,  R. :  Thyroid  Grafts,  Arch,  de  Physiol.,  7:  65,  1895.  Grafts  of  Excess 
Thyroid  Tissue,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  52:  1136,  1900;  58:  361,  1905;  J.  de  Physiol, 
et  de  Pathol,  generale,  3:  200,  1901;  Vitality  of  Tissues  Separated  from  the 
Body,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  55:  828,  1903;  Compensatory  Hypertrophy  of  Thy- 
roid Grafts,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  55:  782,  1903;  Thyroid  Grafts  in  Birds,  C.  R. 
Soc.  Biol.,  56:  192,  1904;  Thyroid  Grafts  in  Fishes  and  Amphibia,  C.  R.  Soc. 
Biol.,  56:  227,  1904;  Heterotransplantation  of  Thyroid,  J.  de  Physiol,  et  de 
Pathol,  generale,  6 :  476,  1904. 

Christiani,  H.  and  A.  Christiani  :  Effect  of  Age  on  Transplantation  of  Thy- 
roid: C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  58:  531,  1905;  Persistence  of  Homoiotransplants  of 
Parathyroid,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.,  92:  1278,  1925. 

Claude,  Albert:  Constitution  of  Protoplasm,  Science,  94:  451,  1943. 

Clemmensen,  John:  Transplantation  of  Tumor  Cells  to  Normal  and  Preirradi- 
ated  Heterologous  Organisms,  Am.  J.  Cancer,  29:  313,  1937. 

Cloudman,  A.  M. :  Genetic  Analysis  of  Carcinomata  Developing  in  the  Same 
Gland  of  an  Individual  Mouse,  Genetics,  17:  468,  1932. 

Cloudman,  A.  M. :  Effect  of  Parabiosis  on  Transplantation  of  a  Hepatoma  in 
Inbred  Strains  of  Mice,  Cancer  Research,  3:  27,  1943. 

Cloudman,  A.  M. :  Parabiosis  and  Transplantation  of  Tumors,  Cancer  Research, 
3:  47,  1943. 

Coca,  A.  F. :  Atopy,  p.  1004  in  The  Newer  Knowledge  of  Bacteriology  and  Im- 
munity by  E.  O.  Jordan  and  I.  S.  Falk,  Univ.  of  Chicago  Press,  1928. 

Cohen-Kysper,  A. :  Significance  of  Genes  for  Determination  and  Development, 
Naturwissensch.,  21:  229,   1933. 

Cole,  Leo  J.:  Each  After  His  Kind,  Science,  93:  289,  316,  1941. 

Cole,  W.  H. :  Transplantation  of  Skin  in  Frog  Tadpoles,  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  35 :  353, 
1922. 

Collins,  H.  H.  and  E.  F.  Adolph  :  Skin  Pattern  in  Urodele  Amphibia,  J.  Morphol., 
42:  473,  1926. 

Coman,  D.  R. :  Human  Neoplasms  in  Tissue  Culture,  Cancer  Research,  2:  618, 
1942. 

Copher,  G.  H.  and  J.  A.  Key:  Transplantation  of  Bladder  and  Bone  Formation, 
Arch.  Surg.,  29:  64,  1934. 

Coonfield,  B.  R.  and  A.  Golden:  Physiological  gradient  in  Mnemiopsis  during 
regeneration   (Organ  differentials),  Biol.  Bullet.,  73:  197,  1937. 

Cori,  C.  F. :  Action  of  Hormones  as  Cause  of  Cancer,  J.  Exp.  Med.,  45 :  983, 
1927. 

Cornman,  Ivor:  Susceptibility  of  Colchicum  to  Colchicine,  Bot.  Gazette,  50: 
104,  1942. 

Correns,  C. :  Self  Sterility  and  Individual  Substances,  Biol.  Centralblatt,  33:  389, 
1913. 

Correns,  C. :  Individuality  and  Individual  Substances,  Naturwissenschaften,  4: 
183,  193  and  210,  1916. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  665 

Correns,   C. :   Non-Mendelian  Heredity,  Verhandl.  d.  V.   Internat.   Congress  f. 

Vererbungswissensch.   Berlin,   1927,  vol.  I.  Leipzig,   1928. 
Corson-White,  E.  P.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Effect  of  Physical  Injuries  on  Growth  of 

Tumor  Cells,  Centralbl.  Bakt.  56:  325,  1910.  Transplantation  of  Stationary 

and  Retrogressing  Tumors,  Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.,  56:  488,  1910. 
Cosak,  G. :  Defense  Powers  against  Infections  in  Young  Nurslings,  Jahrbuch  f. 

Kinderheilkunde,  149:  53,  1937. 
Crampton,  H.  E. :  Transplantation  of  Portions  of  Pupae  of  Lepidoptera,  Arch.  f. 

Entwicklgsmech.,  9:   293,    1900. 
Crossen,  R.  J. :  Homoiotoxins  and  Lymphocytes  in  Guinea  Pig,  Arch.  Pathol., 

6:  396,   1928. 

D 

Dakin,  H.  D.  and  H.  H.  Dale:  Crystalline  Egg  Albumens  of  Hen  and  Duck, 
Bioch.  J.,  13:  248,  1919. 

Dale,  H.  H.  and  P.  Hartley  :  Anaphylaxis  to  Proteins  of  Horse  Serum,  Biochem. 
J.,  10:  408,  1916. 

Danchakoff,  Vera  and  V.  E.  Danchakoff:  The  Age  Factor  in  Grafts;  Trans- 
plantation of  Embryonic  and  Adult  Spleen  of  Amphibia  into  Tail  of  Tadpoles. 
Contributions  to  Embryology,  Carnegie  Instit.  of  Washington,  21 :  127,  1930. 

Danchakoff,  V.  and  S.  M.  Leiden:  Digestive  Activity  of  Mesenchyme,  Biol. 
Bullet.,  43 :  97,  1922. 

Danchakoff,  Vera  :  Mesenchymal  Activity,  a  Factor  in  Resistance  Against  Mouse 
Sarcoma  in  Chick,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  16:  67,  1919. 

Danchakoff,  Vera:  Grafts  of  Adult  Spleen  on  Allantois,  Am.  J.  Anat,  24:  127, 
1918. 

Danforth,  C.  H.  and  F.  Foster:  Endocrine  and  Genetic  Factors  in  Skin  Trans- 
plantation in  Fowl,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  25:  75,  1927:  J.  Exp.  Zool., 
52:  443,  1929. 

Dannheiser,  F. :  Parabiosis  (blood  and  urine),  Beitr.  z.  Klin.  Chir.,  145:  304, 
1928-29. 

Davis,  J.  S. :  Skin  Transplantation,  Johns  Hopkins  Hospital  Reports,  15:  307, 
1910. 

Davis,  J.  S. :  Skin  Grafts  and  Blood  Groups,  Annals  of  Surgery,  66:  89,  1917. 

Davis,  Hallowell:  Electric  Phenomena  of  Brain  and  Spinal  Cord,  Annual  Rev. 
Physiol.,  1 :  345,  1939. 

Dawson,  A.  B. :  Transplantation  of  Skin  in  Necturus,  J.  Morphol.,  34:  487,  1920. 

Dawson,  A.  B. :  Degree  of  Differentiation  of  Mature  Erythrocytes  of  Vertebrates 
(Species  specificity),  Collecting  Net,  7:  117,  1932. 

Dawson,  A.  J. :  Bacterial  Variations  Induced  by  Changes  in  Composition  of  Cul- 
ture Media,  J.  Bacteriol.,  4:  132,  1919. 

Dederer,  C. :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Kidney  and  Ovary  (by  blood  vessel 
anastomosis),  Surg.,  Gynec.  &  Obst.,  31:  45,  1920. 

Defalco,  R.  I. :  Serological  Tests  for  Avian  Organismal  Differentials,  Biol. 
Bullet.,  83:  205,  1942. 

Demoll,  R. :  Injuriousness  of  Inbreeding,  its  Nature  and  Treatment,  Zool.  Jahr- 
bucher,  Abt.  f.  Physiol,  u.  Zoolog.,  39:  443,  1923. 

Dervieux,  M. :  Individual  and  Species  Specific  Precipitin  Reactions  against  Hu- 
man Sperm.  C.  R.  Acad.  d.  Sci.,  172:  1384,  1921. 

Detwiler,  S.  R. :  Transplantation  of  Limbs  in  Amblystoma,  Formation  of  Nerve 
Plexuses,  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  31:  117,  1920;  35:  115,  1922;  57:  183,  1930. 

Deucher,  W.  G.  and  A.  E.  W.  Ochsner:  Skin  Grafting  and  Blood  Groups,  Arch, 
f.  Klin.  Chir.,  132:  470,  1924. 

Van  Deventer,  I.  K.  and  T.  Reich  :  Antihuman  Fibrinolytic  Streptococci,  Proc. 
Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  31 :  821,  1934. 


666  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Van  Deventer,  I.  K. :  Fibrinolysin  of  Streptococci  and  Specific  Adaptation,  Proc. 

Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  32:  50,  366,  1934;  32:  1117,  1935. 
Dmochowski,  L. :  Serological  Specificity  of  Experimental  Tumors,  Am.  J.  Can- 
cer, 37:  252:  1939. 
Dobrzaniecki,  W. :  Homoiotransplantation  and  Blood  Groups,  Ann.  Surg.,  90 : 

926,  1929. 
Dobzhansky,  Theodosius  :   Biological   Adaptations   Scientific   Monthly,  p.  391, 

November  1942. 
Doerr,  R.  and  W.  Berger:  Immunological  Analysis  of  Serum  Protein,  Zeitschr. 

f.  Hygiene,  96:  191,  1932. 
Domm,  L.  V.:  Testes  Grafts  in  Ovariectomized  Fowl,  Anat.  Record,  44:  204, 

1930. 
Driesch,  H. :  Fusion  of  two  blastulae  of  Echinus,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  10: 

411,  1900. 
Durken,  B. :  Introduction  in  Experimental  Zoology,  Transplantation,  p.  227,  Ber- 
lin, 1919. 
Durken,  B. :  Interplantation  of  Embryonal  Cells,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  107: 

727,  1926. 
Dyke,  S.  C. :  Skin  Grafts  and  Blood  Groups,  Lancet,  p.  579,  1922. 
Dltschl,  L.  and  B.  Niekau:  Blood  Vessel  Communication  in  Parabiotic  Rats, 

D.  Zeitsch.  f.  Chir.,  186:  76,  1924. 

E 

Eden,  Rudolf:  Skin  Grafting  and  Blood  Groups,  D.  Med.  Wochschr.,  p.  85,  1922. 
Edwards,  J.  E.,  H.  B.  Andervont  and  A.  J.  Dalton  :  Transplantation  of  Malig- 
nant  Hemangioendothelioma  of  Liver  in  Mouse,  J.   Nat.  Cancer  Inst.,  2: 

479,  1942. 
Ehrenpreis,  Alfred:   Transplantation  of   Spleen  in  Urodeles,   Arch.   f.   Mikr. 

Anat.,  102:  573,  1924. 
Ehrhart,  Albert:  Immune  Reactions  and  Phylogenesis  in  Zoology,  Zeitschr.  f. 

Imm.  forsch.,  60:  156,  1929. 
Ehrich,  W.  E.  and  Harris,  T.  N. :  Seat  of  Production  of  Immune  Substances, 

J.  Exp.  Med.,  76:  335,  1942. 
Ehrlich,  P.  and  J.  Morgenroth  :  Isohemolysins  in  Goats,  Berl.  Klin.  Woch.,  37: 

453,  1900. 
Ehrlich,  P. :  Immunization  against  Transplants  of  Cancerous  Tissues  by  Inocu- 
lation of  Normal  Tissues,  Zeitschr.   f.  arztl.  Fortbild.,  3:  211,   1906;  Arb. 

a.  d.  Inst.  f.  Exper.  Therap.  z.  Frankfurt,  1 :  77,  1906. 
von  Eiselberg,  A.:  Transplantation  of  Skin,  Wien.  Klin.  Woch.,  666,  1889. 
Eisen,  M.  J. :  Constancy  of  Transplanted  Mammary  Carcinoma  in  Inbred  Rats, 

Cancer  Research,  2:  488,  1942. 
Eisler,  M. :  Antigen  Common  to  Human  Cells  and  to  Shiga  Bacillus,  Zeitschr. 

f.  Imm.  forsch.,  65 :  38,  1930. 
Ekman,    G. :    Transplantation   of   Ectoderm   of    Gills    in    Anuran    Amphibians, 

Morphol.  Jahrbuch,  47:  419  and  576,  1913. 
Elson,  J. :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Cross  Striated  Muscle  Tissue  in 

the  Rat,  Am.  J.  Pathol.,  5 :  425,  1929. 
Enderlen,  u.   M.   Borst:   Blood  Vessel  and  Organ  Transplantation,  Verh.   d. 

deutsch.   Path.   Gesellsch.   13,   1909;  Munch.   Med.  Wochenschr.,  57:   1865, 

1910. 
Ephrussi,  B.  and  G.  W.  Beadle:  Transplantation  of  Organs  in  Drosophila  (gene 

hormones),  C.R.  Acad.  Sci.,  98:  1935. 
Erdmann,  Rhoda:  Explantation  and  Relationship,  Zeitschr.  f.  indukt.  Abstam- 

mungs  und  Vererbungslehre,  30:  301,  1923. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  667 

Erdmann,  Rhoda  :  Relationship  of  Anuran  Families  Tested  by  Means  of  Im- 
plantation Experiments  of  Skin  Grown  in  Tissue  Culture,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 
wicklgsmech., 112:  739,  1927. 

Ericks-Aensel,  I.  B.  and  The  Svedberg:  Molecular  Weights  and  P.  H.  Sta- 
bility Regions  of  Hemocyanins,  Biol.  Bullet.,  71 :  498,  1936. 

Ermatinger,  L.,  F.  B.  Queen  and  R.  F.  Parker:  Fate  of  Skin  Bacteria  after 
Autogenous  and  Heterogenous  Transplantation  of  Skin,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp. 
Biol.  &  Med.,  26:   113,   1928. 

Ernst,  Max:  Hormonal  Growth  of  Mammary  Gland  in  Parabiotic  Rats,  D. 
Zeitschr.  f.  Chir.,  202:  231,  1927. 

Eysh,  W.  H.:  Selfsterility  in  Plants,  Science,  94:  144,  1941. 


Famulener,  L.  W. :  Transmission  of  Immunity  (serum  hemolysins)  from  Mother 

to  Offspring  in  Goats,  J.  Inf.  Diseases,  10:  332,  1912. 
Faure-Fremiet,    M.    E. :    Experimental    Involution    and    Tissue    Structure    of 

Sponges,  Arch,  d'anat.  microscop.,  27:  421,  1931;  28:  121,  1932. 
Fels,  Erich  :  Effect  of  Parabiosis  on  Internal  Secretion,  Med.  Klin.,  25 :  557, 

1929. 
Ferguson,  L.  C,  Clyde  Stormont  and  M.  R.  Irwin  :  Antigens  in  Erythrocytes 

of  Cattle,  J.  Immunol.,  44:  147,  1942. 
Fichera,  M.  G. :  Immunization  by  Means  of  Embryonal  and  Fetal  Grafts,  Arch. 

d.  Medec.  Exp.  et  d'anat.  pathol.,  21 :  617,  1909. 
Fick,  R. :  tiber  d.  Vererbungssubstanz,  Arch.  f.  Anat.  u.  Physiol.  (Anat.  Abt.) 

p.  101,  1907. 
Filatow,  D. :  Lens  Formation  in  Rana  Esculenta  from  Transplanted  Epithelium 

of  Bufo.,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  106:  475,  1925.  Transplantation  of  Epi- 
thelium and  Mesenchyme  of  Extremity  Bud  in  Embryos  of  Axolotl.,  Arch.  f. 

Entwicklgsmech.,  113:  240,  1928. 
Finkler,   W. :    Transplantation   of   Head   in   Insects,   Arch.    f.   mikr.   Anat.   u. 

Entwicklgsmech.,  99:   104,   119,   126,  1923. 
Fischer,  A.:  Interaction  of  Two  Fragments  of  Pulsating  Heart  Tissue,  J.  Exp. 

Med.,  39:  577,  1924. 
Fischer,  H. :  Regeneration  and  Transplantation  of  Pancreas  in  Amphibia,  Arch. 

mikr.  Anat.,  77:  1,   1911. 
Fischer,  Heinrich  :  Attempts  to  Influence  Homoiotransplantation  in  Animals, 

Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.,  156:  224,  1929. 
Fischer,  O. :  Paroxysmal  Hemoglobinuria,  Klin.  Wochschr.,  7:  2061,  1928. 
Fitzgerald,  J.  G. :  Racial  Differences  in  Human  Blood,  J.  Med.  Res.,  21 :  41,  1909. 
Flanders,  S.  E. :  The  Role  of  Arrhenotoky  in  the  Adaptation  of  Insects,  Science, 

90:  82,  1939. 
Fleisher,  M.  S.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Transplantation  of  Tumors  in  Animals  with 

Spontaneous  Tumors,  Surg.,  Gynec.  &  Obst.,  17:  203,  1913;  J.  Med.  Res., 

34:  1,  1916;  J.  Cancer  Research  1:  331,  1916. 
Fleisher,  M.  S.,  Miguel  Vera  and  Leo  Loeb:  Immunization  against  Actions 

of  Substances  Inhibiting  Tumor  Growth,  J.  Exp.  Med.,  20:  522,  1914. 
Fleisher,  M.  S.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Heredity  Transmission  of  Differences  in  Sus- 
ceptibility to  Growth  of  Transplanted  Tumors  in  Various  Strains  of  Mice, 

J.  Cancer  Res.,  1:  331,  1916. 
Fleisher,  M.   S. :  Variations  in  Percentage  of  Takes  and  Growth  Energy  of 

Transplanted  Tumors,  Zeitschr.  f.  Krebsforsch.,  14:  8,  1914. 
Fleisher,  M.  S. :  Relationship  of  Various  Antiorganic  Sera,  J.  Immunol.,  7:  51, 

1922. 


668  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Fleisher,  M.  S.  and  N.  Arnstein  :  Specificity  of  Antiorganic  Sera,  J.  Immu- 
nology: 6:  222,  1921. 

Fleisher,  M.  S.:  Reaction  about  Heterogenous  Transplants,  J.  Med.  Res.,  37: 
483,  1918.  Influence  of  Immune  Serum  upon  Reaction  about  Transplanted 
Tissues,  J.  Med.  Res.,  39:  1,  1918.  Leucocytic  and  Fibroblastic  Reactions 
about  Transplanted  Tissues,  J.  Med.  Res.,  42:  163,  1921.  Heterotransplanta- 
tion of  Lens  and  Cornea,  J.  Med.  Res.  42:  491,  1921.  Autotransplantation 
and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Cornea,  Iris,  and  Lens,  J.  Med.  Res.,  42:  173, 
1921.  Immunity  in  Relation  to  Transplanted  Tissue,  J.  Med.  Res.,  43:  145, 
1922. 

Fleisher,  M.  S.,  E.  P.  Corson-White  and  Leo  Loeb:  Quantitative  Investigations 
on  Immunity  against  Tumors  in  Mice,  Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.,  63 :  450,  1912. 

Forssman,  J. :  Problems  of  Immunity  and  Heterogenetic  Antigens,  Wiener  Klin. 
Wochenschr.,  42:  669,  1929. 

Frank,  J.  A.:  Sperm  Extracts  and  Fertilization,  Biol.  Bullet.,  76:  190,  1939. 

Freeman,  W.,  and  I.  W.  Watts:  Functions  of  Frontal  Lobe,  Yale.  J.  Biol.  & 
Med.,  11:  527,  1939. 

Freeman,  N.  E.  and  A.  E.  Schechter:  Specific  Adaptation  of  Dog  Serum, 
Science,  96:  29,  1942. 

Frei,  W.,  H.  Biberstein,  and  H.  Frohlich  :  Sensitization  of  Skin  and  Rela- 
tionship in  Animals,  Klin.  Woch.,  6:  71,  1928. 

Freund,  E.  and  G.  Kaminer  :  Biochemische  Grundlagen  der  Krebsdisposition. 
Wien,  1928. 

Freund,  Jules:  Age  and  Antibody  Formation,  J.  Immunol.,  18:  315,  1931.  Age 
and  Skin  Reactions  against  Pneumococci,  J.  Exp.  Med.,  54:  171,  1931. 

Friedenreich,  V. :  Heredity  of  Human  Blood  Group  Factors,  Hospitals  tidende., 
81 :  293,  1938,  Abst.  in.  J. A.M. A.,  Ill :  760,  1938. 

Friedenthal,  H. :  Production  of  Specific  Precipitins  with  Blood  of  Mammoth, 
D.  Med.  Woch.,  30:  901,  1904. 

von  Frisch,  R. :  Psychology  of  Fish  Clusters,  Naturwissenschaft.,  26:  601,  1938. 

Fruton,  J.  S.  and  Max  Bergmann:  The  Specificity  of  Pepsin  Action,  Science, 
87:  557,  1938. 

Fuchs,  H.  I.  and  collaborators :  Tumor  Specific  Antigens  and  Antibodies  in  the 
Blood  of  Cancer  Patients,  Z.  f.  Imm.  forsch.,  80:  420,  1933;  78:  272,  1933; 
80:  233,  1933.  Diagnostic  Methods  for  Cancer,  Munch.  Med.  Woch.  No.  43, 
p.  1711,  1932. 


Galtsoff,  P.  S. :  Amoeboid  Movement,  Regeneration  and  Agglutination  of  Dis- 
sociated Sponge  Cells,  Biol.  Bullet,  45:  153,  1923;  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  42:  183, 
1925;  Biol.  Bullet,  57:  250,  1929  (with  V.  Pertzoff) ;  J.  Gen.  Physiol.,  10: 
239,  1926-27. 

Gargano,  C. :  Transplantation  of  Selachian  Embryos,  Arch.  Ital.  de  Biologic, 
63:  398,  1915. 

Gassul,  R. :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Explanted  Adult  Frog  Skin,  D.  Med. 
Woch.  35:  1163,  1922;  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  52:  400,  1923. 

Gates,  Ruggles,  R. :  Process  of  Organic  Evolution,  Science  93:  335,  1941. 

Gebhardt,  H. :  Regeneration  and  Transplantation  in  Planarians,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 
wicklgsmech. 107:  684,  1926. 

Geinitz,  B. :  Embryonal  Transplantation  between  Urodeles  and  Anurans,  Arch, 
f.  Entwicklgsmech.  106:  357,  1925. 

Gerard,  R.  W. :  Higher  Levels  of  Integration,  Science  95:  309,  1942. 

Gey,  G.  O. :  Tissue  Cultures  of  Endocrine  Organs  and  their  Transplantation, 
Anat  Record,  70:   1937-38  (Supplement). 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  669 

Giard,  Alfred:  Antagonism  between  Transplantation  and  Regeneration,  C.  R. 
Soc.  Biol.  3:   180,  1896. 

Gier,  H.  T. :  Morphology  and  Behavior  of  Intracellular  Bacteriods  of  Roaches, 
Biol.  Bullet.  71 :  433,  1936. 

Gilman,  L.  C:  Mating  Types  in  Paramecium,  Biol.  Bullet.  80:  384,  1941. 

Glaser,  Otto:  Fertilization  and  Egg  Secretions,  Biol.  Bullet.  41:  63,  1921. 

Glaser,  R.  W. :  Fungi  as  Intracellular  Symbionts  in  Insects  (Mycetocytes  and 
Mycetomas)  ;  the  Relation  of  these  Symbionts  to  Rickettsia,  Arch.  Path. 
9:  71  and  557,  1930. 

Godlewski,  E. :  Stimulation  and  Inhibition  of  Regeneration  in  Axolotl,  Arch.  f. 
Entwicklgsmech.  64:   108,   1928. 

Goebel,  W.  F. :  Hydrolytic  Products  of  Specific  Carbohydrate  from  Friedlander 
Bacillus,  J.   Biol.   Chem.  74:  619,   1927. 

Goebel,  W.  F.  and  O.  T.  Avery:  Chemo-immunol.  Studies  in  Conjugated  Carbo- 
hydrate-Protein, J.  Exp.  Med.  50:  521,  and  533,  1929. 

Goebel,  W.  F. :  Saccharide  Containing  Antigen  in  Immunity  Against  Pneumo- 
cocci,   Science,  91:  20,   1940. 

Goetsch,  W. :  Regeneration  and  Transplantation  in  Planarians,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 
wicklgsmech. 49:  359,   1921. 

Goetsch,  W. :  Animal  Chimaerae  and  Artificial  Individualities,  Naturwissen- 
schaften  11:  327,  1923. 

Goetsch,  W. :  Chimaerae  in  Coelenterates,  Zool.  Anzeig.  56 :  289,  1923. 

Goetsch,  W. :  Reproduction  in  Animal  Chimaerae,  Zeitsch.  f.  ind.  Abstammgs. 
u.  Vererbgslehre  33:  294,  1924. 

Gohrbandt,  E. :  Transplantation  of  Homoiogenous  Skin  in  Parabiotic  Animals, 
Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  139:  471,  1926. 

Golanitzky,  I.:  Transplantation  in  Animals  in  Which  Dyes  had  been  Injected, 
Centralbl.  f.  allg.  Pathologie  24:  809,  1913. 

Goldfarb,  A.  J. :  Experimentally  Fused  Larvae  of  Echinoderms,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 
wicklgsmech. 41 :  579,  1915. 

Goldner,  Jacques  et  I.  Frasin  :  Intraocular  Transplantation  and  Retransplanta- 
tion  of  Thyroid  in  Rabbits,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.  125 :  210,  1937. 

Goldschmidt,  R. :  Some  Aspects  of  Evolution,  Science  78:  539,  1933. 

Gonzalez,  P.,  M.  Armanque  and  F.  Morato  :  Use  of  Absorbents  in  Immuniza- 
tion with  Lipoids,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.  110:  216,  1932. 

Goodman,  Leroy:  Transplantation  of  Ovaries  into  Anterior  Chamber  of  Eye 
of  Adult  Male  Rats,  Anat,  Record  59 :  223,  1934. 

Goodpasture,  E.  W. :  Virus  Infections  of  Tissues  Transplanted  on  Chorioallantois 
of  Chick  Embryo,  Science  95 :  391,  1942. 

Gorer,  P.  A. :  Genetic  and  Antigenic  Basis  of  Tumor  Transplantation,  J.  Path.  & 
Bact.  44:  691,  1937;  47:  231,  1938. 

Gortner,  R.  A. :  Biochemistry  and  the  Problem  of  Organic  Evolution,  Scientific 
Monthly  30:  416,  1930.  ' 

Goto,  N. :  Internal  Secretion  of  Ovary  in  Parabiosis,  Arch.  Exp.  Path.  & 
Pharmac.  94:  124,  1922. 

Gottschaldt,  K. :  Urnwelterscheinungen  im  Erbpsychologischen  Bild.  Natur- 
wissenschaften.  25:  431,   1937. 

Graefenberg,  E.  and  I.  Thies:  Effect  of  Fetal  Guinea  Pig  Serum  on  Normal 
and  Pregnant  Guinea  Pigs;  Difference  in  Toxicity  Between  Serum  of  New- 
born and  Older  Individuals,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  9:  749,  1911. 

Graefenberg:  Toxic  Effects  of  Transplantation  of  Testicle  in  Rabbits,  D.  Med. 
Woch.  No.  7:  331,   1911. 

Grauer,  R.  C.  and  G.  H.  Robinson  :  Lactation  in  Benign  mam.  Adenoma  in 
Rats,  Am.  J.  Cancer  16:  191,  1932. 

Grave,  Caswell:  Metamorphosis  in  Ascidians,  Collecting  Net  12:  No.  8,  1937. 


670  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Graves,  W.  W. :  Organ  Specificity  of  Scapula;  its  Age  Incidence,  Am.  J. 
Psychiatry  93:  1109,  1937. 

Green,  C.  V.:  Size  Inheritance  and  Growth  in  Cross  of  Mouse  (Heterosis), 
J.  Exp.  Zool.  59:  213,  247,  1931. 

Green,  R.  G. :  Nature  of  Virus  Adaptation,  Science  95:  602,  1942. 

Greene,  H.  S.  N. :  Heterologous  Transplantation  of  Human  and  Other  Tumors 
in  Anterior  Chamber  of  Eye  of  Guinea  Pigs,  Science  88:  357,  1938;  Cancer 
Research  2:  649,   1942. 

Greene,  H.  S.  N. :  Immunity  Against  Tumors  Transplanted  into  Anterior  Cham- 
ber of  Eye  and  into  Testicle,  Cancer  Research  2:  669,  1942. 

Gregoire,  Ch.  :  Lymphocytic-epithelial  Symbiosis  in  Thymus,  Extrait  des  Ar- 
chives d.  Biol.  46:  717,  1935. 

Gregory,  P.  W.  and  W.  E.  Castle:  Size  Inheritance  in  Rabbit,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  59: 
199,  1931. 

Griffith,  Fred:  Types  of  Pneumococci,  J.  of  Hyg.  27:  113,  1928. 

Gross,  Ludwik  :  Specific  Immunity  to  Transplantable  Neoplasm,  Am.  J.  Cancer 
31 :  609,  1937.  Spontaneous  Recovery  from  Transplanted  Sarcoma  in  Sexually 
Immature  Mice,  Cancer  Research  2:  571,  1942.  Intradermal  Immunization  of 
C3H  Mice  Against  a  Sarcoma  that  Originated  in  an  Animal  of  the  Same 
Line,  Cancer  Research  3:  326,  1943. 

Gruneberg,  H. :  Inheritance  of  Human  Skin  Patterns,  Zeitsch.  f.  ind.  Abstammgs 
und  Vererbgslehre  46:  285,  1928. 

Guerriero,  C. :  Action  of  Hormones  on  Transplanted  Uterus:  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol. 
103 :  719,  1930. 

Guyer,  M.  F. :  Testes  of  Hybrids  from  Guinea  Hen  and  Common  Fowl,  J.  Morphol. 
23 :  45,  1912. 

Gyorgy,  P.  and  E.  Witebsky:  Transfusion  of  Blood  from  Identical  Blood  Group 
and  Anaphylaxis,  Munch.  Med.  Wochschr.  76:  195,  1929. 

H 

de  Haan,  J.  A.  Bierens:  Homoiogenous  and  Heterogenous  Union  of  Eggs  and 

Early  Embryonic  Stages  in  Echinids,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  36:  473,  1913; 

37:420,1913. 
von  Haberer:  Transplantation  of  Adrenal  Gland,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  86:  399, 

1908;  94:  606,  1911. 
Haddow,  Alexander:  Erythrocyte  Individuality  and  Transplantation  of  Fowl 

Sarcoma,  J.  Path.  &  Bact.  39:  345,  1934. 
Hadley,  C.  E. :  Compatibility  of  Skin  of  Rana  Pipiens  and  Rana  Clamitans  as 

Tested  by  Transplantation,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  54:  127,  1929. 
Hadorn,  E. :  Ring  Gland  in  Drosophila,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.  23:  478,  1937. 
Hadorn,  E.  and  James  Neel:  Effects  of  Hormone  of  Ring  Gland  on  Pupation  in 

Drosophila,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.  23:  478,  1937;  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech. 

138:281,  1938. 
Haeckel,  E. :  Allgem.  Entwicklgsgeschichte  der  Organismen,  1866. 
Haecker,  V. :  Individual  Biochemical  Differences,  in  "Allgemeine  Vererbungs- 

lehre,"  1911,p.23ff. 
Halsted,  W.  S. :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Parathyroid  in  Dogs,  J.  Exp. 

Med.  11:  175,  1909. 
Hamburger,  Fr.  Arteigenheit  und  Assimilation,  Leipzig  u.  Wien  1903. 
Hamburger,   Fr.  :  Assimilation  of  and  Immunization  against  Proteins,  Wiener 

Klin.  Woch.  14:  1202,  1901;  15:  1188,  1902;  (with  B.  Speck)  17:  641,  1904; 

Species  Differences,  Digestive  Changes  and  Assimilation  of  Proteins,  Wien. 

Klin.  Woch.  26:  1948,  1913. 
Hammond,  J.  Uterine  Grafts,  Brit.  J.  Exp.  Biol.  4:  349,  1926-27. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  671 

von  Hansemann,  D. :  Relations  between  Hybridization  and  Transplantation, 
Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  42:  126,  1916. 

Harde,  E. :  Intracerebral  Transplants  of  Tumors,  Annales  de  l'Instit.  Pasteur, 
42:  1259,  1928. 

Harms,  W. :  Transplantation  of  Ovaries  in  Lumbricidae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech. 34:  90,  1912;  in  Tritons,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  35:  748,  1913. 

Harms,  W. :  Transplantation  of  Thumb  Pad  in  Rana,  Zool.  Anzeiger,  39:  145, 
1912. 

Harms,  W. :  Transplantation  of  Ovaries  into  Different  Species  in  Triton,  Zool. 
Anzeiger  37:  225,  1911;  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  35:  748,  1912-13. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Embryonic  Transplantation  and  Development  of  Nervous  Sys- 
tem, Anat.  Rec.  2:  385,  1908. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Growth  and  Regeneration  of  Tail  of  Frog  Larvae,  Arch.  f. 
Entwicklgsmech.  7:  430,  1898. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Transplantation  of  Limbs  and  the  Development  of  Nerves,  J. 
Exp.  Zool.  4:  239,  1907;  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.  1:  539,  1915. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Heteroplastic  Transplantation  of  Limbs,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci. 
10:  69,  1924.  Heterotransplantation  of  Eye  in  Amblystoma,  Anat.  Record. 
31 :  299,  1925. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Relations  of  Symmetry  in  Transplanted  Limbs,  J.  Exp.  Zool. 
32:  1,  1921. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Development  and  Growth  of  Eye  Studied  by  Means  of  Hetero- 
plastic Transplantation,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  120:  1,  1929. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Development  of  Balancer  in  Amblystoma  J.  Exp.  Zool.  41 :  349, 
1925. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Organizer  Action,  Science  85 :  373,  1937. 

Harrison,  R.  G. :  Symmetry  in  the  Developing  Embryo,  Collecting  Net,  11:  217, 
1936. 

Harvey,  E.  B. :  Parthenogenetic  Merogony,  Biol.  Bullet.,  71 :  101,  1936. 

Harvey,  E.  B. :  Crossfertilization  in  Echinoderms,  Collecting  Net,  p.  118,  1932; 
Science,  94:90,  1941. 

Harvey,  E.  N. :  Specificity  of  Luciferin  and  Luciferase,  J.  Gen.  Physiol.  4:  285, 
1922. 

Haterius,  H.  O.,  M.  M.  Schweizer  and  H.  H.  Charipper:  Persistence  of  Hypo- 
physeal Transplants  in  the  Eye,  Endocrinol.  19:  673,  1935. 

Haurowitz,  F.,  K.  Sarafran  and  Paula  Schwerin :  Antigenic  Properties  of  Sub- 
stituted Serum  Globulins,  J.  Immunology  40:  391,  1941. 

Hazen,  E.  L. :  Incitants  of  Human  Botulism;  Specificity  of  Toxins  and  Species 
Differentials,  Science  87:  413,  1938. 

Hedin,  S.  G. :  Specific  Inhibition  of  Action  of  Rennet,  Zeitschr.  f.  Physiol. 
Chemie  63:  143,  1909;  74:  242,  1911;  Immunization  against  Rennet  of  Calf, 
Zeitschr.  f.  physiol.  Chem.  77:  229,  1912. 

Hediger,  H. :  Psychological  Investigations  in  Circus,  Naturwissenschaften  26: 
242,  1938. 

Hediger,  H. :  The  Significance  of  Flight  in  the  Life  of  Animals,  Naturwissen- 
schaften 25 :  185,  1937. 

Heidelberger,  M.  and  F.  E.  Kendall  :  Protein  Fractions  in  Streptococcus  Hemo- 
lyticus,  J.  Exp.  Med.  54:  515,  1931.  Polysaccharides  of  Pneumococci,  J.  Exp. 
Med.  53:625,  1931. 

Heidelberger,  M.  and  K.  Landsteiner:  Antigenic  Properties  of  Hemoglobin, 
j.  Exp.  Med.  38:561,1923. 

Heidelberger,  M.,  W.  F.  Goebel  and  O.  T.  Avery:  Polysaccharides  in  Fried- 
lander  Bacilli,  J.  Exp.  Med.  42:  701  and  709,  1925. 

Heidelberger,  M.  and  W.  F.  Goebel:  Hydrolytic  Products  of  Specific  Poly- 
saccharides of  Pneumococci,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  74:  613,  1927. 


672  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Heidelberger,  Michael:  Structure  of  Natural  and  Synthetic  Antigens,  Science 

84:498,  1936. 
Hektoen,  L.  and  W.  H.  Welker:  Precipitin  Reactions  of  Serum  Proteins,  J. 

Inf.  Dis.  35 :  295,  1924. 
Hektoen,  L.,  H.  Fox  and  K.  Schulhof:  Precipitin  Reaction  of  Thyroglobulin, 

J.  Inf.  Dis.  40:  641,  1927. 
Hektoen,  L :  Precipitin  Test  for  Human  Serum,  J. A.M. A.  78:  704,  1922. 
Hektoen,  L.,  and  A.  G.  Cole:  Precipitin  Reaction  of  Egg  Albumin  and  Fowl 

Blood  Protein,  J.  Inf.  Dis.  40:  647,  1927;  Protein  of  Egg  White,  J.  Inf.  Dis. 

42:1,1928. 
Hektoen,  L.  and  W.  H.  Welker:  Precipitin  Reaction  of  Fibrinogen,  J.  Inf. 

Dis.  40:  706,  1927;  J.A.M.A.  85:  434,  1925. 
Hektoen,  L.  and  K.  Schulhof:  Lens  Precipitins  (alpha  and  beta  crystallins), 

J.  Inf.  Dis.  35 :  433,  1924. 
Hektoen,  L. :  Precipitin  Reaction  of  Lens,  J.  Inf.  Dis.  31 :  72   1922. 
Hektoen,  L.  and  K.  Schulhof:  Erythroprecipitins,  J.  Inf.  Dis.  33:  224,  1923. 
Hektoen,  L.  and  W.  H.  Welker:  Precipitin  Reaction  of  Bence-Jones  Protein, 

J.  Inf.  Dis.  34:  440,  1924. 
Hektoen,  L.,  F.  S.  Robscheit-Robbins  and  G.  H.  Whipple:  Precipitin  Reaction 

of  Muscle  Hemoglobin,  J.  Inf.  Dis.  42:  31,  1928. 
Heller:  Transplantation  of  Parts  of  Joints,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  104:  845,  1914. 
Henle,  Werner:  Specificity  of  Mammal.  Spermatozoa,  J.  Immunol.  34:  325,  1938. 
Henle,  W.,  Gertrude  Henle,  and  L.  A.  Chambers:  Head  and  Tail  Specific 

Fractions  of  Spermatozoa,  J.  Exp.  Med.  68:  335,  1938. 
Henle,  Werner  and  Leslie  A.   Chambers:   Serological  Specificity  of  Heavy 

Particles  from  Normal  Organs,  Science  92:  313,  1940. 
Henshaw,  P.  S.:  Autogenous  Antigens  Produced  in  Skin  Exposed  to  Radiation, 

Physiol.  Zool.  2:  168,1929. 
Hermannsdorfer,  A.:  Toxic  Effects  in  Parabiotic  Rats,  D.  Zeitschr.  f.  Chir.  178: 

289,  1923. 
Herrick,  C.  J.:  Evolution  of  Cerebral  Localization  Pattern,  Science  78:  439, 

1933. 
Herrick,  E.  H. :  Skin  Grafts  and  Cell  Movements  in  Frog  Tadpoles,  Biol.  Bullet. 

63:271,1932. 
Hertwig,  O. :  Vegetative  Affinity  and  Species  Specificity  of  Cells  and  Tissues, 

in  "D.  Zellen  and  Gewebe,"  Jena,  1898  and  Hertwig,  O.  und  G.  Allgemeine 

Biologie,  Jena,  1923. 
Heston,  W.  E. :  Parasites,  in  "Biology  of  Laboratory  Mouse,"  Philadelphia,  1941. 
Hesselberg,  Cora:  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Thyroid  in  Guinea  Pig, 

J.  Exp.  Med.  21 :  164,  1915. 
Hesselberg,   Cora,  William  Kerwin  and  Leo  Loeb:  Auto  and  Homoiotrans- 
plantation of  Uterus  in  Guinea  Pig,  J.  Med.  Research  38:  11,  1918. 
Hesselberg,  Cora  and  Leo  Loeb  :  Successive  Transplantations  of  Thyroid  Tissue, 

J.  Med.  Res.  38 :  33,  1918. 
Hicks,  R.  A.  and  C.  C.  Little:  Blood  Relationships  of  Four  Strains  of  Mice, 

Genetics,  16:397,  1931. 
Hinschberger,  G. :  Reaction  of  Homoiotransplants  of  Thyroid  Gland  in  Guinea 

Pigs  to  anterior  Pituitary  Gland,  C.R.  Soc.  Biol.  106:  234,  1931. 
Hirschler,  Jan  :  Serological  Differences  between  Larval  and  Adult  Tissues  in 

Amphibia,  Biol.  Zentralblatt,  42:  303,  1922. 
Hirszfeld,  Ludwig:  Inheritance  of  Blood  Groups,  Klin.  Woch.  10:  1910,  1931. 
Hirszfeld,  L.  and  W.  Halber  :  Differences  and  Relationships  of  Blood  Groups  in 

Man  and  Animals,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.  99:  1166,  1928. 
Hirszfeld,  L.  and  W.  Halber:  Relations  between  Group  Specific  Structures  in 

Man  and  Animals,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  59:  17,  1928. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  673 

Hirszfeld,  L.,  W.  Halber  and  J.  Rosenblatt:  Reactions  of  Human  Embryonal 
Extracts  with  Anticancer  Immune  Serum,  Serum  of  Carcinoma  Patients, 
and  Serum  of  Pregnant  Women,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  74:  209,  1932. 

Hirszfeld,  L.  and  W.  Halber:  Complement  Fixing  Antibodies  against  Extracts 
of  Cancer  Tissue  with  Serum  of  Cancer  Patients  and  Pregnant  Women, 
Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  67:  286,  1930. 

Hirszfeld,  L. :  Immunity  and  Serological  Maturation  of  Cells,  Klin.  Woch.  schr. 
10:  1931. 

Hirszfeld,  L.,  W.  Halber  and  J.  Laskowski:  Serological  Specificity  of  Cancer 
Cells,  Klin.  Woch.  8:  1563,  1929. 

Hitchcock,  H.  B. :  Amphibian  Skin  after  Transplantation  into  Lymphsac  (tissue 
culture  in  vivo)  and  in  Tissue  Culture  (in  vitro),  J.  Exp.  Zool.  81 :  299,  1939. 

Hoffmeistek,  W. :  Homoiogenous  and  Heterogenous  Transplantation  of  Organs, 
D.  Zeitschr.  f.  Chirurg.  207:  1,  1928. 

Hofmann,  K.  and  Max  Bergmann:  Enzyme  Specificity  (Heterotrypsin),  Sci- 
ence, 89:  86,  1939. 

Holman,  Emile:  Skin  Grafting  and  Protein  Sensitization,  Surgery,  Gynec.  and 
Obstetrics,  38:  100,  1924. 

Holtfreter,  J;:  Character  of  Inductor  Substances,  Naturwissenschaften,  20:  973, 
1932;  21:  766,  1033. 

Holtfreter,  J. :  Organizer  Action  of  Combination  of  Entomesoderm  and  Ecto- 
derm, Biol.  Zentralbl.  53 :  404,  1933. 

Holtfreter,  J. :  Induction  by  Dead  Embryonic  Material  and  Specificity  of  In- 
duction, Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  128:  584,  1933;  132:  225  and  307,  1934. 

Hooker,  S.  B.  and  W.  E.  Boyd:  Tyrosin  and  Histidin-diazo-arsanilic  Acids  as 
Haptens,  J.  Immunol.  25  :  61,  1933. 

Hopfner,  E. :  Transplantation  of  Blood  Vessels  and  Replantation  of  Amputated 
Extremities,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chirurg.  70:  417,  1903. 

Horowitz,  N.  H. :  Tissue  Reaction  to  Transplantation  of  Muscle  in  Triturus 
viridescens,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  76:  105,  1939. 

Horstadius,  Sven  :  Determination  in  Development  of  Echinoderm  Egg,  Acta 
Zoologica9:  1,  1928. 

Huggins,  C.  B. :  Transplantation  of  Bladder  and  Bone  Formation,  Proc.  Soc. 
Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  27:  349,  1930;  J.  Exp.  Med.  58:  393,  1933;  60:  199,  1934. 

Humphrey,  R.  R.  and  R.  K.  Burns,  Jr.  :  Toxic  Effects  in  Heteroplastic  Parabiosis 
or  Grafting  in  Amblystoma,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  81 :  1,  1939. 


Ingebrigtsen,  R. :  Transplantation  of  Arteries  and  Isoagglutinines,  Miinch.  Med. 

Wochschr.  59:  1475,  1912. 
Ingle,  D.  T.  and  R.  W.  Cragy:  Effect  of  Hormone  on  Autotransplants  of  Thyroid 

Tissue,  Endocrinology  24:  550,  1939. 
Ingle,   D.   T.   and  E.   C.   Kendall  :   Effect  of  Adrenal  and  Pituitary   Cortical 

Hormone  on  Atrophy  of  Adrenal,  Science,  86 :  245,  1937. 
Irving,  Laurence:  Adaptive  Processes  and  Species  Differences  in  Respiration 

of  Mammals,  Am.  J.  Physiol.  124:  729,  1938;  Physiol.  Reviews,  19:  112,  1939. 
Irwin,  M.  R.  and  L.  J.  Cole:  Immunogenetic  Studies  of  Species  and  of  Species 

Hybrids  in  Doves,  J.  Immunol.  33:  355,  1937. 
Irwin,  M.  R. :  Resistance  to  Disease  in  Inbred  Strains  of  Rats,  J.  Immunol.  24: 

285,  297,  1933. 
Irwin,  M.  R.  and  R.  T.  Hill:  Parabiotic  Twins  in  Doves;  Agglutination  of 

Erythrocytes  by  Blood  Serum,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  33 :  566,  1936. 
Irwin,  M.  R. :  A  Genetic  Analysis  of  Species  Differences  in  Columbidae,  Genetics, 

24:709,  1939. 


674  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Irwin,  M.  R.  and  R.  W.  Cumley:  Speciation  from  the  Point  of  View  of  Genetics, 
Biolog.  Symposia  2:  31,  1941. 

Irwin,  M.  R. :  Dissimilarities  between  Antigenic  Properties  of  Red  Blood  Cells 
of  Dove  Hybrids  and  Parental  Genera,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  29: 
850,  1932. 

Ishii,  O.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Transplantation  of  Mouse  Carcinoma  with  an  Experi- 
mentally Decreased  Virulence,  J.  Med.  Res.  31 :  223,  1914. 

Issajew,  W. :  Inheritance  in  Animal  Chimaerae,  Biol.  Centralbl.  43:  115,  1923- 
24;  J.  Genetics  14:  278,  1924. 

J 

Jacobs,    M.   H.   and  A.   K.   Parpart:   Species   Differences   in   Permeability  of 

Erythrocytes,  Biol.  Bullet.  73 :  380,  1937. 
Jacobs,  M.  H. :  Permeability,  Annual  Rev.  Physiol.  1:  1,  1939. 
Jacobs,  M.  H. :  Absorption  of  Chemicals  by  Red  Blood  Corpuscles  and  Relation- 
ship, Science  89:  10,  1939. 
Jaeger,  Gustav:  Uber  d.  Bedeutung  d.  Geschmacks  u.  Geruchsstoffes,  Zeitschr. 

f.  Wissensch.  Zool.  27:  319,  1876. 
Jehn,  W. :  Nephrectomy  in  parabiosis,  Zeitschr.  f.  exper.  Pathol.  &  Therapie  6: 

16,  1909. 
Jennings,  H.  S. :  Fundamental  Units  in  Biology,  Science  84:  445,  1936. 
Jennings,  H.  S. :  Individual  Reactions  in  Protozoa,  Science,  92:  539,  1940;  94: 

447,  1941. 
Jennings,  H.  S. :  Sex  Reaction  Types  and  their  Interrelations  in  Paramecium 

Bursaria,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sc.  24:  112,  1938. 
Jensen,    C.    O. :    Transplantation    of    Mammary    Gland    Carcinoma    in    Mice, 

Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  34:  28,  1903. 
Jensen,  Paul:  Individual  Physiological  Differences  Between  Cells  of  the  Same 

Species,  Pfliigers,  Arch.  62:  172,  1896. 
Jianu,  J.:  Retransplantation  of  Thigh  in  Dog;  Retransplantation  of  Extremities 

in  Man,  Pedicle  Transplantations,  Arch.  Klin.  Chir.  102:  57,  1913. 
Joest,  Ernst:  Transplantation  in  Lumbricidae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  5:  419, 

1897. 
Johnson,  M.  W.  and  Oscar  Riddle:  Class  Specificity  of  Hormones,  Proc.  Soc. 

Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  42:  260,  1939. 
Jollos,  Victor:  Genetik  u.  Evolutions  Problem,  Leipzig  1931.  Modifications  and 

Mutations  in  Drosophila  through  Action  of  Heat,  Naturwissenschaften,  21 : 

831,  1933. 
Jones,   E. :   Breakdown  of  Hereditary  Immunity  to  Transplantable  Tumor  by 

Introduction  of  Irritating  Agent,  J.  Cancer  Res.  10:  448,  1926. 
Jones,  P.  F. :  Selective  Fertilization  in  Pollen  Mixtures,  Biol.  Bullet.  38:  251, 

1920;  Science  55:  348,  1922. 
Jost,  L. :  Self  Sterility  in  Some  Plants,  Bot.  Zeitschr.  65 :  77,  1907. 
Jungeblut,  C.  W.  and  E.  T.  Engle:  Neutralization  of  Virus  of  Poliomyelitis 

by  Certain  Normal  Animal  Sera;  Effect  of  Age  of  Animals,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp. 

Biol.  &  Med.  29:879,  1932. 
Jungeblut,  C.  W. :  Blood  Groups  and  Power  of  Human  Serum  to  Inactivate 

Virus  of  Poliomyelitis,  J.  Immunol.  24:  157,  1933. 
Jungeblut,  C.  W.  and  Murray  Sanders:  Transmission  of  Murine  Strain  of 

Poliomyelitis  to  Guinea  Pigs  and  Rhesus  Monkeys,  J.  A.  M.  A.  116:  2137, 

1941. 

K 

Kallas,  Hellmuth  :  Precocious  Puberty  in  Parabiosis,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.  100:  979, 
1929. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  675 

Kalmanson,  G.  M.  and  J.  J.  Bronfenbrenner:  Bacteriophage,  J.  Immunol.  45: 

13,  1942. 
Karshner,  W.  M. :  Hemagglutination  in  Chicken,  J.  Lab.  &  Clinical  Med.  14: 

346,  1928/29. 
Keeler,  Clyde  E. :  Transplantation  of  Adult  Frog  Eyes,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  54:  461, 

1929. 
Kelley,  R.  W.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Autogenous  Transplantation  of  Pigmented  Dorsal 

and  Ear  Skin  to  Defects  in  White  Skin  in  the  Guinea  Pig,  Anat.  Record  44: 

487,  1939. 
Keysser,  Fr.  :  Transplantation ;  Attempt  to  Improve  Results  of  Homoiogenous 

Transplantation    by    Immunization    with    Tissue    Extracts,    Beitr.    z.    Klin. 

Chir.  110:660,  1918. 
King,   H.   D. :   Regeneration   and   Transplantation   in   Hydra  viridis,  Arch.    f. 

Entwicklgsmech.  13:  135,  1902. 
King,   H.    D. :   Regeneration   and   Transplantation   in   Asterias,   Arch.    f.   Ent- 
wicklgsmech. 7:  351,  1898. 
Kirk,  J.  S.  and  J.  B.  Sumner:  Immunological  Identity  of  Soy  and  Jack  Bean 

Urease,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  29:  712,  1931-32. 
Klopstock,  A.  and  H.  Lehmann-Facius:  Cytolytic  Reactions  against  Carcinoma 

and  Embryonal  Cells  in  Immune  Sera,  Klin.  Woch.  67:  1085,  1928. 
Klopstock,  Felix  and  Ernst  Simon:  Specific  Antigens  in  Cancer,  Z.  f.  Krebs- 

forsch.  37:127,  1932. 
Kodama,  H. :  Serological  Tests  for  Fish  Eggs,  Arch.  f.  Hyg.  78:  247,  1912/13. 
Kodama,    Sh.:   Effect   on   Liver   of   Parenteral    Injection   of   Liver   Emulsion, 

Transaction  Jap.  Path.  Soc.  13:  86,  1923. 
Koller,  G. :  Internal  Secretion  in  Invertebrates,  Biol.  Reviews  4:  269,  1929. 
Koller,  Gottfried:  Hormone  bei  Wirbellosen  Tieren,  Leipzig  1938. 
Kolodziejski,  Z. :  Transplantation  and  Regeneration  of  Skin  in  Axolotl,  Extrait 

d.  Bullet,  de  FAcad.  Polon.,  Serie  B  1928. 
Kopec\  St.  :  Effects  of  Castration  and  Transplantation  of  Sex  Glands  in  Lepidop- 

tera,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  33:  1,  1912.  Effect  of  Brain  on  inception  of 

Insect  Metamorphosis,  Biol.  Bullet.  142:  323,  1922. 
Koppanyi,  Th.:  Retransplantation  of  Eyes  in  Vertebrates,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech. 99 :  15,  42,  60  and  76,  1923. 
Koppanyi,  T. :  Transplantation  of  Testicles  of  Urodeles,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech. 102:  707,  1924;  Transplantation  of  Spleen  in  Rats,  J.  A.  M.  A.  83: 

1654,  1924. 
Kornfeld,  Werner:  Metamorphosis  of  Transplanted  Gills  in  Salamanders,  Arch. 

f.  Entwicklgsmech.  40 :  369,  1914. 
Korschelt,   E. :   Regeneration   and   Transplantation   in   Lumbricidae,   Verh.   d. 

deutsch.  Zoolog.  Gesellsch.  Vol.  6-8 :  79,  1896-98. 
Korschelt,   E. :   Morphogenetic  Induction  Following  Transplantation,  Arch.   f. 

Entwicklgsmech.  117:  1,  1929. 
Kossel,  H. :  Proteins  of  Fish  Sperm,  Zeitsch.  f.  physiol.  Chem.  88:  163,  1913. 
Kozelka,  A.  W. :  Genetic  and  Hormonal  Factors  in  Skin  Grafting  in  Fowl,  J. 

Exp.  Zool.  61 :  431,  1932.  Individuality  of  Red  Blood  Cells  in  Fowls,  J.  Im- 
munol. 24:  519,  1933. 
Kczelka,  A.  W. :  Serological  Studies  of  Tissue  Antagonism,  Physiol.  Zoology, 

6:  159,  1933. 
Kozelka,  A.  W. :  Parabiosis  of  Chicks;  Effect  on  Secondary  Sex  Characters, 

27th  annual  meeting,  Am.  Assoc.  Zoologists,  Anat.  Record  44:  209,  1930 

(Abstract). 
Kraus,  R.,  K.  Ishiwara  and  R.  Winternitz:  Effect  of  Normal  Serum  and  of 

Serum  of  Carcinoma  Patients  on  Embryonal  Cells,  Wien.  Klin.  Wochenschr. 

25 :  583,  1912. 


676  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Kreezer,  George:  Individuality  in  Electroencephalogram,  Report  of  Committee 

on  Research,  Yearbook,  Am.  Philosoph.  Society,  p.  196,  1938. 
Kritschewski,  J.  L. :  Antigenic  Differences  between  Embryonal  and  Adult  Tis- 
sues, Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  72:  81,  1914;  J.  Inf.  Dis.  32:  192,  1923. 
Kritschewski,  J.  L.  u.  R.  E.  Messik:  Relation  of  Forssman  Antigen  to  Blood 

Group  Antigens  in  Man,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  65:  405,  1930;  52:  339, 

1929. 
Kronenberg,  M. :  Individuality,  Naturwissenschaften  11:  325,  1923. 
Krusius,  F.  F. :  Antigenic  Characteristics  of  Lens,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  5 : 

699,  1910. 
Kubanyi,  A.:  Skin  Grafting  and  Isoagglutination,  Arch.  Klin.  Chir.  129:  644, 

1924. 
Kuhn,  Alfred:  Physiological  Effects  of  Some  Genes  on  Development  in  Ephestia 

(Gene  hormones),  Naturwissenschaften  20:  974,  1932. 
Kuttner,  H. :  The  Problem  of  Heterotransplantation,  Zentralbl.  f.  Chir.  51:  19, 

1934. 
Kupelwieser,  H. :  Stimulation  of  Echinus  Eggs  by  Sperm  of  Worms,  Arch. 

Zell  forsch.  8:352,  1912. 
Kurz,  Oscar:  Transplantation  of  Leg  in  Triton,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  34: 

588,  1912. 
Kylin,  Eskel:  Transplantation  of  Hypophysis,  Acta  Med.  Scandinavia  91:  428. 

1937. 


Lake,  G.  C,  T.  B.  Osborne  and  H.  G.  Wells:  Immunological  Relationship  of 

Hordein  of  Barley  and  Gliadin  of  Wheat,  J.  Infect.  Dis.  14:  364,  1914. 
Lambert,  R.  A.  and  F.  M.  Hanes:  Cultivation  of  Tissue  in  Plasma  from  Alien 

Species,  J.  Exp.  Med.  14:  129,  1911. 
Lambert,  R.  A. :  Comparison  of  Growth  of  Normal  Cells  and  Cancer  Cells  in 

Tissue  Culture,  J.  Exp.  Med.  17:  499,  1913. 
Lambert,  R.  A.:  Influence  of  Mouse-Rat  Parabiosis  on  Growth  in  Rats  of  a 

Transplantable  Mouse  Sarcoma.  J.  Exp.  Med.  13:  257,  1911. 
Lancefield,  D.  S. :  Genetics  of  Crosses  of  Two  Races  of  Drosophila  obscura, 

Zeitschr.  f.  ind.  Abstammungs  u.  Vererbungslehre  52:  287,  1929. 
Lancefield,   R.   C. :   Serological   Differentiation   of   Hemolytic   Streptococci,   J. 

Exp.  Med.  57:  571,  1933. 
Landsteiner,   K. :   Agglutination    Reactions   of   Normal    Human    Blood,    Wien 

Klin.  Woch.  14:  132,  1901. 
Landsteiner,   K. :    Hemolysins,   Agglutinins   and   Anti-Ferments,    Centralbl.    f. 

Bakt.  27:  357,  1900. 
Landsteiner,  Karl  and  Karl  Leiner:  Differences  in  Erythrocytes  of  Different 

Individuals.  Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  38:  548,  1905. 
Landsteiner,  Karl  and  Max  Reicher:  Differences  in  Erythrocytes  of  Indi- 
viduals in  Various  Diseases.  Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  39:  712,  1905. 
Landsteiner,  K,  J.  van  der  Scheer,  and  D.  H.  Witt:  Group  Specific  Floccula- 

tions  with  Human  Blood.  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  22:  289,  1925. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Serological  Examination  of  Species 

Hybrids.  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  21:  252,  1924.  J.  Immun.  9:  213 

and  221,  1924. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  C.  P.  Miller,  Jr.  :  Serological  Studies  on  Blood  of  Primates. 

J.  Exp.  Med.  42:  841,  853,  and  863,  1925. 
Landsteiner,  Karl:  Cell  Antigens  and  Individual  Specificity.  J.  Immunol.  15: 

589,  1928;  Complex  antigens,  Klin.  Woch.  6:  103,  1927. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Serological  Differentiation  of  Steric 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  677 

isomers,  J.  Exp.  Med.  48:  315,  1928.  Antigens  of  Erythrocytes,  J.  Exp.  Med. 

42:  121,  1925. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  P.  A.  Levene:  Heterogenetic  Haptens,  J.  Immunol.  14:  81, 

1927. 
Landsteiner,   K.   and  C.   P.   Miller,  Jr.  :   Individual  differences   of  blood  of 

chickens  and  ducks,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  22:  100,  1924-25. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  P.  Levine:  Individual  Differences  in  Human  Blood,  J.  Exp. 

Med.  47:  757,  1928.  J.  Immunol.  17:  1,  1928;  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med. 

28 :  309,  1930. 
Landsteiner,    K.    and    P.    Levine:    Inheritance    and    Racial    Distribution    of 

Agglutinable  Properties  of  Human  Blood,  J.  Immunol.  18 :  87,  1930. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  P.  Levine:  Group  Specific  Substances  in  Human  Spermato- 
zoa, J.  Immunol.  12:  415,  1926. 
Landsteiner,  K. :   Serological  tests  with  Blood  of  Cavia  Porcellus  and  Cavia 

Rufescens,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  28:  981,  1931. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  A.  S.  Wiener:  M.  Agglutinogens  in  the  Blood  of  Monkeys, 

J.  Immunol.  33:  19,  1937;  Rh  Antigen  in  Erythrocytes,  Proc.  Exp.  Biol.  & 

Med.  43:  223,  1940;  J.  Exper.  Med.  74:  309,  194. 
Landsteiner,   K.   and   P.   Levine:   Multiplicity   of   Isoagglutinin   Reactions   in 

Human  Blood.  J.  Immunol.  17:  1,  1929. 
Landsteiner,  K.,  Levine  P.,  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Anaphylactic  Reactions 

produced  by  Azo  Dyes.  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  27:  811,  1930. 
Landsteiner,   K.   and   P.   Levine:   Differentiation   of   Human   Blood  Type  by 

Means  of  Normal  Animal  Serum,  J.  Immunol.  20:  179,  1931. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  P.  Levine:  Immunization  of  Chimpanzees  with  Human 

Blood,  J.  Immunol.  22:  397,  1932.  Individual  Differences  in  Chicken  Blood, 

Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  30:  209,  1932. 
Landsteiner,   K.   and  John  Jacobs  :   Immunization  with   Haptens,   Proc.   Soc. 

Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.,  29:  570,  1932;  30:  1055,  1932-33. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Anaphylactic  Shock  by  Azo  Dyes,  J. 

Exp.  Med.  57:633,  1933. 
Landsteiner,  K.,  L.  G.  Longsworth,  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Electrophoresis 

of  Egg  Albumin  and  Hemoglobins,  Science,  88 :  89,  1938. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  J.  van  der  Scheer:  Cross  Reactions  of  Egg  Albumin  sera, 

J.  Exp.  Med.  71 :  445,  1940. 
Landsteiner,  K.  and  M.  W.  Chase :  Sensitization  with  Simple  Chemical  Com- 
pounds, J.  Exp.  Med.  66:  337,  1937;  73:  431,  1941. 
Lane,  C.  E.  and  I.  E.  Markee:  Responses  of  Ovarian  Intraocular  Transplants 

to  Gonadotropins,  Growth  5 :  61,  1941. 
Lathrop,  A.  E.  C.  and  Leo  Loeb:  Action  of  Hormones  as  Cause  of  Cancer, 

J.  Cancer  Research  1 :  1,  1916. 
Lauer,  A.:   Skin  Patterns,  Zeitsch.   f.  ind.  Abstamm.  u.  Vererbgslehre  50,  74, 

1929. 
Lauer,  A. :  Blood  Groups  in  Dog,  Zeitschr.  f .  Imm.  forsch.  68 :  434,  1930. 
Lazarus-Barlow,  W.  S.  and  R.  H.  Parry:  The  Brain  and  Immunity  Reactions 

to  Jensen's  Rat  Sarcoma,  Brit.  J.  Exp.  Path.  4:  80,  1923. 
van  Leeuwen,  W.  Storm  :  Allergens  of  Animal  Hair,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch. 

68:427,  1930. 
Lehmann,  W.  and  H.  Tammann:  Transplantation  and  the  Action  of  Dyes, 

Beitr.  z.  Klin.  Chirurg.  135 :  259,  1925. 
Lehmann,  W.  and  H.  Tammann:  Immunizing  Function  of  Reticuloendothelial 

System,  Z.  F.  Imm.  forsch.  45 :  493,  1926. 
Lehmann-Facius,  H. :  Serological  Diagnosis  of  Cancer,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch. 

67:  377,  1930  (with  T.  Toda) ;  Klin.  Woch.  9:  2430,  1930;  75:  217,  1932;  80: 

181,  1933. 


678  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Lenart,  Georg  and  Julius  Konig:  Skin  Grafting  and  Isoagglutinins,  Klin. 
Wochschr.  7:549,  1928. 

von  Lengerken,  H. :  Head  Transplantation  in  Coleoptera,  Zool.  Anzeiger,  59 : 
166,  1924. 

Levine,  Milton  and  David  State:  Blood  Transfusions,  J.A.M.A.  120:  275,  1942. 

Levine,  Milton  and  David  State:  Skin  Sensitivity  to  Human  Plasma,  Science 
96:68,  1942. 

Levine,  Philip  and  E.  M.  Katzin:  Isoimmunization  in  Pregnancy,  Proc.  Soc. 
Exper.  Biol.  &  Med.  45 :  343,  1940. 

Levine,  Philip,  E.  M.  Katzin  and  Lyman  Burn  ham  :  Isoimmunization  in  Preg- 
nancy, Erythroblastosis  Foetalis,  J.A.M.A.  116:  825,  1941. 

Levine,  P.,  E.  M.  Katzin,  P.  Vogel,  and  Lyman  Burnham  :  Pathogenesis  of 
Fetal  Erythroblastosis,  Science  94:  371,  1941. 

Levine,  P.  and  K.  Landsteiner:  Immune  Isoagglutinins  in  Rabbits,  J.  Immunol. 
21:513,  1931. 

Levy,  S.  E.  and  Alfred  Blalock:  Transplantation  of  Adrenal  in  Dog  Leg  by 
Blood  Vessel  Anastomosis,  Annals  of  Surgery  109:  84,  1939. 

Lewis,  J.  H.  and  H.  G.  Wells:  Immunological  Properties  of  Alcohol-soluble 
Vegetable  Proteins,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  66:  37,  1925. 

Lewis,  J.  H. :  Immunological  Specificity  of  Brain  Tissue,  J.  Immunol.  24:  193, 
1933.  Antigenic  Properties  of  Insulin,  J.  A.  M.  A.  108:  1136,  1937. 

Lewis,  M.  R. :  Transmissible  Monocytoma  of  Mouse,  Am.  J.  Cancer,  36 :  34,  1939 ; 
and  E.  G.  Lichtenstein  :  Breaking  Down  of  Resistance  of  Mice  to  Trans- 
plantation of  Tumors  of  Another  Strain,  Am.  J.  Cancer  28:  746,  1936. 

Lewis,  W.  H. :  Development  of  the  Amphibian  Lens  under  Influence  of  Optic 
Vesicle,  Am.  J.  Anat.  3:  505,  1904.  Transplantation  of  Otic  Vesicle  in  Am- 
phibian Embryos,  Anat.  Record  1 :  141,  1907.  Transplantation  of  Neural 
Plate  in  Amphibian  Embryos,  Anat.  Record  4:  191,  1910. 

Leypoldt,  H. :  Transplantation  in  Lumbricidae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  31:  1, 
1911. 

Lieske,  Rudolf:  Grafting  in  Plants,  Ber.  d.  Bot.  Gesellsch.  38:  353,  1921. 

Lignac,  G.  O.  E.  u.  G.  A.  Kreuzwendedich  von  dem  Borne:  Heterotransplan- 
tation of  Tumors  in  Mice  Injected  with  Trypan  Blue,  Krankheitsforschung, 
6:  265,  1928;  7:  119,  1929. 

Des  Ligneris,  M. :  Biological  Characters  of  a  Tumor  Produced  in  Vitro ;  Speci- 
ficity of  Neutralizing  Substances,  C.R.  Soc.  Biol.  121 :  1579,  1936.  Specificity 
and  Immunity  in  Tissue  Cultures  with  Liquid  Media  (Immune  and  heterog- 
enous sera),  Arch.  f.  Exper.  Zellforschung  18:  456,  1936. 

Lindeman,  V.  F. :  Transplantation  and  Metamorphosis  of  Frogskin,  Physiol. 
Zool.  2:255,  1929. 

Lillie,  F.  R. :  Problems  of  Fertilization,  Univ.  of  Chicago  Press  1919. 

Lillie,  F.  R. :  Growth  Rate  and  Hormone  Threshold,  Am.  Naturalist,  46:  171, 
1932. 

Lillie,  F.  R.:  Studies  of  Fertilization,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  14:  515,  1913;  Biol.  Bullet. 
40:1,  1921. 

Lipschutz,  A.:  Transplantation  of  Dried  Ovaries,  Virch.  Arch.  272:  245,  1929. 
Lipschiitz  and  H.  Kallas,  Virch.  Arch.  277:  694,  1930. 

Little,  C.  C. :  The  Genetics  of  Tumor  Transplantation,  in  "Biology  of  the  Labo- 
ratory Mouse,"  p.  279,  1941. 

Little,  C.  C.  and  E.  E.  Tyzzer  :  Inheritance  of  Susceptibility  to  a  Transplantable 
Tumor,  J.  Med.  Res.  33:  393,  1916. 

Little,  C.  C. :  Factors  Influencing  Growth  of  a  Transplantable  Tumor  in  Mice, 
J.  Exp.  Zool.  31 :  307,  1920. 

Little,  C.  C.  and  L.  C.  Strong:  Genetic  Studies  of  Transplantation  of  Two 
Adenocarcinomata,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  41 :  93,  1924. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  679 

Little,  C.  C.  and  B.  W.  Johnson,  Inheritance  of  Susceptibility  to  Implants  of 

Spleen  Tissue  in  Mice,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Med.  Biol.  19:  163,  1922. 
Little,  C.  C. :  The  Genetics  of  Tumor  Transplantation  in  Mammals,  J.  Cancer 

Research  8:  74,  1924. 
Little,  C.  C. :  Role  of  Heredity  in  Determining  Incidence  and  Growth  of  Cancer, 

Am.  J.  Cancer  15:  2780,  1931;  J.  A.  M.  A.  106:  2234,  1936. 
Little,  R.  B. :  Isoagglutinins  in  the  Blood  of  Cattle,  J.  Immunol.  17:  377,  1929. 
Loeb,  Jacques:   Nature  of  Hybrids  Between  Eggs  of  Strongylocentrotus  and 

Sperm  of  Molluscs,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  26:  476,  1908. 
Loeb,  Jacques:  Is  Species  Specificity  a  Mendelian  Character?  Science  45:  191, 

1917. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Syngenesiotransplantation  in  Guinea  Pig,  J.  Med.  Res.  39:  39,  1918; 

41:  305,  1920;  Am.  J.  Pathol.  3:  29,  1927. 
Loeb,  Leo  :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  in  Guinea  Pig  Kidney,  J.  Med.  Res. 

37:  229,  1917;  cartilage,  Am.  J.  Pathol.  2:  111,  1926;  thyroid,  Am.  J.  Path. 

2:99,  1926. 
Loeb,  Leo,  Marian  Moskop-Kirtz  and  H.  T.  Blumenthal  :  Transplantations  in 

Mice,  Unpublished  Experiments. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Factors  in  Life  and  Growth  of  Transplanted  Tissues,  J.  A.  M.  A.  59: 

726,  1917;  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  17:  153,  1921;  Transplantation  and 

Family  Relationship,  Am.  Naturalist  54:  45,  1920;  Mode  of  Inheritance  of 

Individuality  Differential,  Am.  Naturalist  54:  55,  1920. 
Loeb,  Leo  :  Individuality  Differential  and  Reactions  against  Transplanted  Tissues 

and  Tumors,  J.  Cancer  Res.  10 :  252,  1926. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  Sewall  Wright:  Individuality  Differentials  in  Inbred  Families 

of  Guinea  Pigs,  Am.  J.  Path.  3:  251,  1927. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  H.  C.  McPhee:  Individuality  Differentials  in  Inbred  Families  of 

Guinea  Pigs,  Am.  Naturalist,  65:  385,  1931. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  H.  D.  King:  Transplantation  and  Individuality  Differentials  in 

Inbred  Strains  of  Rats,  Am.  J.  Path.  3 :  143,  1927. 
Loeb,  Leo:  The  Organization  of  Blood  Clots  after  Auto,  Homoio  and  Hetero- 
transplantation, J.  Med.  Res.  37:  353,  1918. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  and  Potential  Immortality  of  Mammalian  Tissues, 

J.  General  Physiol.  (Jacques  Loeb,  Memorial  Vol.)  8:  417,  1926. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Tissue  Transplantation  and  Anaphylaxis,  J.  Immunol.  2:  557,  1917. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  of  Regenerating  Epithelium  and  Serial  Transplan- 
tation of  Epithelium,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  24:  638,  1907. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  W.  H.  F.  Addison  :  Transplantation  of  Skin  of  Guinea  Pig  into 

Animals  of  Different  Species,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  37:  73,  1909. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  W.  H.  F.  Addison  :  Transplantation  of  Pigeon  Skin  into  Pigeons 

and  into  Other  Species,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  32:  44,  1911. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  H.  D.  King:  Transplantation  and  Individuality  Differentials  in 

Inbred  Strains  of  Rats,  Am.  J.  Path.  3:  143,  1927;  Arch.  Path.  12:  203,  1931; 

Loeb,  Leo,  H.  D.  King  and  H.  T.  Blumenthal,  Biol.  Bullet.  84:  1,  1943. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  H.  D.  King:  Analysis  of  Organismal  Differentials  of  Gray  Nor- 
way Rats  and  of  Two  Mutant  Races,  Am.  Natur.  69:  5,  1935. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  R.  M.  Simpson:  Effects  of  Age  and  Hormones  on  Stroma  of 

Thyroid  and  Mammary  Gland,  Science  88:  433,  1938. 
Loeb,  Leo  :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Cartilage  and  Bone  in  Rat,  Am. 

J.  Path.  2:  315,  1926. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Thyroid  Gland  in  Rat,  Am.  J. 

Pathol.  2:  301,  1926. 
Loeb,   Leo:   Behavior  of  Organs  after  Transplantation  in  Rat  and  Power  of 

Resistance  of  Constituents  of  Various  Organs,  J.  Med.  Res.  39:  189,  1918. 


680  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Loeb,  Leo:  Heterotransplantation  of  Kidney,  J.  Med.  Res.  42:   1317,  1920-21; 

Heterotransplantation  of  Thyroid,  J.  Exp.  Med.  31 :  765,  1920. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Influence  of  Changes  in  Chemical  Environment  on  Life  and  Growth 

of  Tissue,  J.A.M.A.  64:  726,  1915. 
Loeb,   Leo:   Grafting  of  Tissues  into   Nearly  Related  Individuals  in  Rat  and 

Mode  of  Inheritance  of  Individuality  Differentials,  J.  Med.  Res.  39:  393, 

1918. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Syngenesiotransplantation  in  Rat,  Am.  J.  Pathol.  3:  45,  1927. 
Loeb,  Leo  :  Multiple  Transplantations  of  Thyroid  and  the  Lymphocytic  Reaction, 

J.  Med.  Res.  39:  71,  1918. 
Loeb,  Leo  :  Tumor  Growth  and  Tissue  Growth,  Proc.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  47 :  3,  1908. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  of  White  and  of  Pigmented  Skin  in  the  Ear  of  the 

Guinea  Pig,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  6:1,  1897. 
Loeb,   Leo:   Growth   of  Epithelium,   Arch.   f.   Entwicklgsmech.    13:  487,    1902; 

Growth  of  Epithelium  in  Agar  and  Blood  Serum,  J.  Med.  Res.  8:  109,  1902. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  Cora  Hesselberg:  Hypertrophy  in  Autotransplants  of  Thyroid 

Gland,  J.  Med.  Res.  40:  265,  1919;  The  Effect  of  Homoiotoxins  in  Hyper- 
trophy of  the  Thyroid,  41 :  283,  1920. 
Loeb,  Leo  :   Effect  of  Administration  of  Thyroid,  Thymus,  Theelin  and  of  a 

Meat  Diet  on  Hypertrophy  of  Thyroid,  J.  Med.  Res.  42:  77,  1920. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  of  Tissues  from  Mouse  to  Rat  and  vice  versa,  Am. 

Naturalist  69:  239,  1935. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  W.  J.  Siebert:  Transplantation  of  Skin  and  Cartilage  in  Chicken, 

Arch.  Path.  20 :  28,  1935. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  J.  S.  Harter  :  Heterotransplantation  of  Cartilage  and  Fat  Tissue, 

Am.  J.  Path.  2:  521,  1926. 
Loeb,   Leo:   Thyroid   Gland,   Iodine  and  Anterior   Hypophysis;   Mechanism  of 

Compensatory  Hypertrophy  of  Thyroid  Gland,  Klin.  Woch.   11:  2121  and 

2156,  1932. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  of  Benign  Tumors  in  the  Rat,  J.  Med.  Research,  7: 

44,  1902;  in  dog:  J.  Med.  Res.  17:  299,  1907  (with  S.  Leopold);  in  rat,  J. 

Cancer  Research  1:  427,  1916  (with  M.  S.  Fleisher). 
Loeb,  Leo:  The  Causes  of  Cancer,  Scientific  Monthly  47:  51,  1938. 
Loeb,  Leo,  V.  Suntzeff  and  E.  L.  Burns:  Effects  of  Age  and  Estrogen  on 

Stroma  of  Vagina,  Cervix  and  Uterus,  Science  88:  432,   1938. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Action  of  Hormones  as  Cause  of  Cancer,  J.  Med.  Res.  40:  477,  1919; 

J.  Cancer  Research  8:  274,  1924;  Internat.  Confer,  on  Cancer,  London  1928, 

p.   48;   Quantitative  Relations  Between  Factors  Which  Cause  Cancer  and 

the  Rapidity  and  Frequency  of  the  Cancerous  Transformation,  C.R.   Soc. 

Biol.  89:  307,  1923;  La  Presse  Medicale  31:  709,  1923. 
Loeb,  Leo  and  M.  S.  Fleisher:  Inheritance  of  the  Factors  Determining  Growth 

of  Tumors,  Centralbl.  f.  Bakt.  67:  135,  1912. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Transplantation  of  Tumor  in  Rats,  Virchow's  Arch.  167:  175,  1902; 

172:  345,  1903;  J.  Med.  Res.  6:  28,  1901;  8:  44,  1902. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Tissue  Growth  and  Tumor  Growth,  J.  Cancer  Res.  2:  135,  1917. 
Loeb,  Leo:  General  Problems  and  Tendencies  in  Cancer  Research,  Science  43: 

293,    1916;    Quantitative   Relations   between   Factors    Causing   Cancer   and 

Rapidity  and  Frequency  of  Cancerous  Transformation,  J.  Cancer  Res.  8: 

274,  1924. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Inheritance  of  Cancer  in  Mice,  Am.  Naturalist  55:  510,  1921 ;  Heredity 

and   Internal   Secretion  in  Etiology  of  Cancer,  Rep.  Internat.   Confer,  on 

Cancer,  London,  p.  48,  1928. 
Loeb,  Leo:  Inoculability  of  Tumors  and  Endemic  Occurrence  of  Cancer  Internat. 

Clinics  3:  115,1907. 
Loeb,    Leo:    Problems    of    Experimental    Tumor     Investigation,    Zeitschr.     f. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  681 

Krebsforsch.  5:  451,  1907;  Transplantation  of  Tumors,  Virchow's  Arch. 
172:  345,  1903;  Conditions  Determining  Variations  in  Energy  of  Tumor 
Growth,  Am.  Medicine  10:  265,  1905. 

Loeb,  Leo:  A  Contact-combination  Tumor  in  a  Mouse,  Centralbl.  f.  allg.  Pathol. 
u.  path.  Anat.  22:  993,  1911. 

Loeb,  Leo  :  Formation  of  Sarcoma  after  Transplantation  of  Adenocarcinoma  in 
a  Japanese  Mouse,  Zeitschr.  f.  Krebsforsch.  7:  2,  1908. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Germ  Cells  and  Somatic  Cells,  Am.  Natural.  49:  287,  1915. 

Loeb,  Leo  :  Graded  Relation  Between  Intensity  of  Hormone  Action  and  the 
Character  of  Recipient  Tissue,  Endocrinology  12:  161,  1928. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Inherited  Organ  Specificity  and  Its  Age  Incidence  (hormones  and 
the  process  of  ageing),  Harvey  lectures  36:  228,  1940-41. 

Loeb,  Leo  :  Mode  of  Action  of  External  Stimuli  in  Formation  of  Placentomas, 
Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  32:  67,  1911;  Effect  of  Combination  Stimuli  on 
Growth  of  Transplanted  Uterus  of  Guinea  Pig,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech. 
31:  456,  1911. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Production  of  Deciduomata,  Zentralbl.  f.  allg.  Path.  &  Path.  Anat. 
18:  563,  1907;  J.  A.  M.  A.  50:  1897,  1908;  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  27:  463, 
1909;  31:  456,  1910-1911. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Immunity  and  Adaptation,  Biol.  Bullet.  9:  141,  1905. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Movements  of  Amoebocytes  and  the  Experimental  Production  of 
Amoebocyte  Tissue,  Washington  University  Studies  8:  5,  1920;  Amoeboid 
Movement  and  Agglutination  in  Amoebocytes  of  Limulus  and  the  Relation 
of  These  Processes  to  Tissue  Formation  and  Thrombosis,  Protoplasma  2: 
512,  1927. 

Loeb,  Leo  and  I.  T.  Genther :  Differences  in  the  Reactions  of  Individual  Amoebo- 
cytes, Arch.  f.  Exper.  Zellforsch.  9:  214,  1930. 

Loeb,  Leo  and  Oscar  Bodansky:  Ursease  of  Limulus,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  61:  79, 
1926;  72:  415,  1927. 

Loeb,  Leo  and  I.  Lorberblatt:  Urease  of  Limulus,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  & 
Med.  25:  323,  1928;  T.  Biol.  Chem.  78:  417,  1928  (with  M.  E.  Field); 
Biochem.  Zeitschr.  236:  298;  244:  222,   1932. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Specific  Adaptation  of  Tissue  Coagulins,  Montreal  Med.  J.  32:  507, 
1903;  Virchow's  Arch.  176:  101,  1904;  Biochem.  Centralbl.  6:  829  and  889, 
1907;  with  M.  S.  Fleisher,  Biochem.  Zeitsch.  28:  169,  1910. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Evolution  of  Thrombosis,  Virchow's  Arch.  173:  35,  1903;  176:  10, 
1904;  185:  160,  1906;  Hofmeister's  Beitr.  z.  Chem.  Physiol,  u.  Pathol.  5: 
534,  1904;  6:  260,  1905;  8:  67,  1906;  9:  185,  1907;  Protoplasma  2:  512, 
1921;  4:  596,  1928. 

Loeb,  Leo,  M.  S.  Fleisher  and  L.  Tuttle:  Interaction  Between  Blood  Serum  and 
Tissue  Extract  in  Coagulation  of  Blood,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  2:  461  and  485,  1922. 

Loeb,  Leo,  A.  Strickler  and  Lucius  Tuttle:  Cause  of  Death  after  Injection 
of  Heterogenous  Blood  Serum,  Virchow's  Arch.  201:  5,  1910. 

Loeb,  Leo:  Specific  Adaptation  Between  Body  Fluids  and  Blood  Cells  in  In- 
vertebrates, J.  Med.  Res.  42:  277,  1921 :  Amoeboid  Movement,  Tissue  Forma- 
tion and  Consistency  of  Protoplasm,  Am.  J.  Physiol.  56:  140,  1921. 

Lohner,  L. :  Theory  of  Effects  of  Inbreeding,  Zeitschr.  f.  ind.  Abstammungs  und 
Vererbgslehre,  33:  260,  1924. 

Lohner,  L. :  On  Individual  Substances  and  Biochemical  Individual  Specificity, 
Pfiuger's  Arch.  198:  490,  1923. 

Lohner,  L. :  On  Human  Individual  and  Regional  Scents,  Pfliiger's  Arch.  202: 
25,  1924. 

Lohner,  L. :  Inbreeding  and  Biochemical  Individual  Specificitv,  Rivista  di  Biol. 
3:  3,  1921. 

Loeper,  M.  et  R.  Turpin  :  Influence  of  Artificial  Lymphocytosis  on  Evolution  of 


682  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Sarcoma  in  Rat,  C.  R.  Soc  Biol.  91:  164,  1924:  Lymphocytes  and  Cancer, 

a  Critical  Review;  Annales  de  Medicine  16:  236,  1924. 
Lorenz,  Konrad  :  Formation  of  Concept  of  Instinct,  Naturwissenschaften  25 :  289, 

307  and  324,  1937. 
Lucre,  B.  M.  Strumia,  S.  Mudd,  Morton  McCutcheon  and  E.  B.  H.  Mudd: 

Specific  Adaptation  of  Serum  in  Phagocytosis,  J.  Immunol.  24:  455,  1933. 
Lucke,  B.,  M.  McCutcheon,  M.  Strumia  and  S.  Mudd:  Specific  Adaptation 

in  Opsonin  and  Bacteriotropin  Action,  J.  Exp.  Med.  49:  797,  1929. 
Lumsden,  T. :  Immunity  to  Transplanted  Tumors,  Lancet  213:  1283,  1917;  217: 

814,  1920;  Am.  J.  Cancer,  15:  563,  1931. 
Lumsden,  T. :  Method  of  Demonstrating  Effect  of  Cytotoxins,  J.  Pathol.  &  Bact. 

44:  515,  1937. 
Lumsden,  T. :  Agglutination  Tests  in  the  Study  of  Tumor  Immunity;  Am.  J. 

Cancer  32:  395,  1938.  Blood  Groups  and  Agglutination  of  Human  Red  Blood 

Corpuscles  by  Rat  Sera,  Am.  J.  Cancer,  35:  222,  1939. 
Lumsden,  T. :  Antiserum  Against  Spontaneous  Mouse  Carcinoma,  J.  Path.  & 

Bact.  35:  441,  1932. 
Lumsden,  T.   (with  A.  C.  Kohn-Speyer) :  Cytotoxins  for  Normal  and  Tumor 

Cells;  Protection  of  Cells  Against  Homologous  Antibodies,  J.  Path.  &  Bact. 

32:  185,  1929. 
Lurie,  Max  B. :  Human  and  Bovine  Tubercle  Bacilli  in  Organs  of  Rabbits, 

J.  Exp.  Med.  48:  155,  1928. 
Lux,  L.,  G.  M.  Higgins  and  F.  C.  Mann:  Functional  Homoiografts  of  Rat 

Adrenal  Gland  Grown  in  Vitro,  Anat.  Rec.  70:  29,  1937. 

M 

MacDowell,  E.  C,  J.  S.  Potter  and  M.  J.  Taylor:  Influence  of  Transplanta- 
tion upon  Immunological  Properties  of  Leukemic  Cells,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sc. 
25 :  416,  1939. 

MacDowell,  E.  C. :  Genetic  Aspects  of  Mouse  Leukemia,  Am.  J.  Cancer,  26 :  85, 
1936. 

McJunkin,  F.  A.  and  B.  D.  Roberts:  Effects  of  Insulin  on  Pancreatic  Islets  of 
Young  Rats  (Tissue  specificity  of  hormones),  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med. 
29:  893,  1932. 

MacNider,  Wm.  DeB.  :  Acquired  Resistance  to  Injury  of  Regenerating  Renal 
Epithelium,  Science  88 :  447,  1938. 

Madison,  R.  R. :  Fibrinolysis  by  Streptococci  of  Human  and  Animal  Origin, 
Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  31 :  1018,  1933/34;  34:  299,  301,  1936. 

Mahr,  M.  M. :  Serological  Tests  for  Organismal  Differentials  in  Monezia,  Biol. 
Bullet.  83:  88,   1942. 

Mangold,  O. :  Induction  by  Neurula  in  Urodeles,  Naturwissensch.  21:  761,  1933. 

Mangold,  O. :  Heterogenous  Induction  in  Urodeles,  Naturwissensch.  19:  905, 
1931. 

Mangold,  O. :  Autonomous  and  Complementary  Induction  in  Amphibia,  Natur- 
wissensch. 20:  371,  1932. 

Mangold,  Otto:  Transplantation  in  Triton  and  the  Specificity  of  Germ  Layers, 
Arch,  f .  Entwicklgsmech.  100 :  198,  1923/24. 

Mangold,  Otto  and  F.  Seidel:  Homoiogenous  and  Heterogenous  Fusion  of 
Segmenting  Triton  Eggs,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  Ill:  593,  1927. 

Manley,  O.  T.  and  David  Marine:  Transplantation  of  Ductless  Glands, 
J.  A.  M.  A.  67:  260,  1916.  Age  and  Autotransplantation  of  Spleen  in  Rabbits, 
Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  14:  123,  1916-17. 

Mann,  L.  S.  and  W.  H.  Welker:  Antiserum  for  Carcinoma,  Am.  J.  Cancer, 
39:  360,  1940. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  683 

Mann,  F.  C. :  Failure  of  Homoiotransplantation  of  Mammary  Carcinoma  in 
Dogs,  J.  Cancer  Res.  4:  331,  1919. 

Manwaring,  W.  H.  and  I.  L.  Azeverde  :  Serum  Antibodies  and  Their  Precursors 
in  Tissues,  J.  A.  M.  A.  91 :  386,  1928. 

Marine,  David  and  O.  T.  Manley:  Homoiogenous  and  Autogenous  transplanta- 
tion of  Spleen,  J.  Exp.  Med.  32:  113,  1920. 

Marker,  I.  E. :  Role  of  Nerves  in  Transplants  of  Uterus,  Am.  J.  Physiol.  100: 
374,'  1932. 

Markham,  F.  S. :  Submaxillary  Gland  Virus  of  Guinea  Pig,  Am.  J.  Pathol.  14: 

311,  1938. 

Marshall,  H.  T.  and  Oscar  Teague:  Racial  Differences  in  Human  Blood, 
Philipp,  J.  Science  3:  357,  1908. 

Martins,  Th.:  Exchange  of  Hormones  in  Parabiotic  Animals,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol. 
102,  605  and  614,  1929.  Transplantation  of  Hypophysis  into  Anterior  Cham- 
ber of  Eye  of  Rat.  Action  of  Oestrin,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.  123 :  702,  1936. 

Masson,  J.  C:  Skin  Grafting,  J.  A.  M.  A.  70:  1581,  1918. 

Matson,  A.  A.  and  E.  O.  Brady:  Serological  Determination  of  Blood  Relation- 
ship, Especially  of  the  American  Indian,  J.  Immunol.  30:  445,  1936;  Matson, 
A.  A.  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  31 :  964,  1934. 

Matsuyama,  Rokeno:  Parabiosis  in  Rats,  Frankf.  Zeitschr.  f.  Pathol.  25:  97, 
1921. 

Matthey,  Robert:  Transplantation  of  Eye  in  Triton,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech. 
109:  326,  1927. 

May,  R.  M.:  Skin  Grafts  in  Lizards,  Br'it.  J.  Exp.  Biol.  1:  539,  1923-24. 

May,  R.  M. :  Hormonal  Effects  of  Embryonal  Hypophysis  after  Intraocular 
Transplantation  in  Rats,  C.  R.  Soc.  Biol.   124:  920,  1937. 

May,  R.  M. :  Subcutaneous  Transplantation  of  Thyroid  from  Embryos  or  New 
Born  Animals  in  Rats,  C.  R.  Acad.  d.  Sciences  199:  807,  1934.  Intraocular 
Transplantation  of  Thyroid  and  Parathyroid  in  Rat,  C.  R.  Acad.  d.  Sc.  194: 
1525,  1932;  Arch.  d.  Biol.  44:  149,  1933. 

Mayeda,  T. :  Transplantation  of  Skin  in  Parabiotic  Rats,  D.  Zeitsch.  f.  Chir. 
167:  295,  1921. 

Meisenheimer,  J. :  Transplantation  of  Ovaries  in  Butterflies,  Zool.  Anzeiger  35 : 
446,  1909-10. 

Meyns,  R. :  Transplantation  of  Testicles  in  Frogs,  Arch.  f.  Physiol.  132:  433, 
1910;  Arch.  f.  mikr.  Anat.  79:  148,  1912. 

Mez,  Carl  and  H.  Ziegenspeck:  Serological  Diagnosis  of  Species  Relationship 
of  Proteins  in  Plants,  Bot.  Arch.  12:  163,  1925. 

Mez,  Carl:  Phylogenesis  in  Plants  and  Serum  Reactions,  Naturwissenschaften, 
18:  1125,1930. 

Miles,  W.  R. :  Polarity  Potential  of  Human  Eye  (organ  specificity),  Science  88: 
437,  1938. 

Milojevich,  B.  D. :  Transplantation  of  Regenerates  of  Extremities  in  Triton, 
Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  103 :  80,  1924. 

Mirsky,  A.  E.  and  Linus  Pauling:  Structure  of  Native,  Denatured  and  Coagu- 
lated Protein,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sc.  22 :  439,  1936. 

Moevus,  Franz:  Caritonoids  Directing  Sex  Reactions  in  Algae,  Naturwissen- 
schaften, 27 :  97,  1939. 

Montalenti,  G. :  Ontogenesis  of  Hybrids  between  Bufo  Vulgaris  and  Bufo 
Viridis;  Mechanism  of  Injury,  Physiol.  Zoology  6-  329,  1933. 

Moore,  A.  R.  and  J.  C.  Welch :  Association  Hysteresis  in  Amblystoma,  J.  Comp. 
Psychol.  29:  283,  1940. 

Moore,  A.  R. :  Function  in  Aganglionic  Central  Nervous  System,  J.  Comp.  Psychol. 
28:313,  1939. 

Moore,  C,  V.  Suntzeff  and  Leo  Loeb  :  Specificity  in  Inhibiting  Action  of  Blood 


684  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Serum  on  Coagulating  Effect  of  Tissue  Extract,  Am.  J.  Physiol.  114:  1,  1935. 
Moore,  R.  A.,  H.  B.  Rosenblum,  S.  G.  Tolins,  and  R.  Melchionna:  Physiol. 

Response  of  Prostatic  and  Vesicular  Tissue  Transplanted  into  Eye,  Proc. 

N.Y.  Path.  Soc.  18:  1936-37. 
Moran,  T. :  Lipoid  Antibodies  after  Treatment  with  Organ  Suspensions,  Zeitsch. 

f.  Immunitatsforsch.  67:  115,  1930. 
Morgan,  T.  H.:  Auto  fertilization,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  78:  271,  319,  1938;  80:  19,  1939; 

85 :  1, 1940;  Biol.  Bullet.  161 :  82  and  172:  82,  1942. 
Morgan,  T.  H.:  The  Rise  of  Genetics,  Science  76:  261,  285,  1932. 
Morgan,  T.  H.:  Self  Fertilization  in  Ciona,  Biol.  Bullet.  8:  313,  1905. 
Morgan,  J.  E.  and  S.  J.  Webster:  Malformations,  Tumors,  and  Certain  Other 

Abnormalities  in  Identical  Twins,  J.  A.  M.  A.  110:  1744,  1938. 
Morgenroth,  J.  and  R.  Bieling:  Amboceptors  and  Receptors;  Organ  Specificity 

and  Tissue  Specificity,  Biochem.  Zeitschr.  68:  85,  1915. 
Moritz,  Otto:   Psytoserology,  Biol.  Zentralbl.  48:  431,   1928;  Arch.   f.  Wiss. 

Botanik.  Planta,  Abt.  E.  7:  759,  1929;  Beihefte  z.  Bot.  Centralbl.  46:  II  Abt. 

114,  1929. 
Morpurgo,  B. :  Parabiosis  in  rat,  Verhandl.  d.  deutsch.  pathol.  Gesellsch.  13:  150, 

1909;  Klin.  Woch.  2:  129,  1923;  Frankfurt.  Zeitschr.  f.  Path.  34:  337,  1926. 
Morpurgo,  B. :  Effect  of  Trypan  Blue  Accumulations  and  of  Starvation  on  Homoio 

and  Hetero  Transplanted  Skin  in  Rats,  Verh.  d.  d.  path.  Gesellsch.  p.  330,  1928. 
Morville,  P.:  Development  of  Blood  Characteristics  During  First  Years  of  Life, 

Acta  Path.  Scandinavia  6:  39,  1929. 
Mottram,  I.  C. :  Effect  of  Radiation  on  Rous  Chicken  Tumor,  Brit.  J.  Exp.  Pathol. 

9:147,  1928. 
Mudd,  Stuart  and  Maria  Wiener:  Antigenic  Structure  of  Hemolytic  Strepto- 
cocci; Relationships  of  Nucleoproteins,  J.  Immunol.  45:  21,  1942. 
Murphy,  J.  B.  and  E.  Sturm  :  Action  of  Inhibitor  Extracted  from  Chicken 

Tumors  on  Mouse  Tumor,  J.  Exp.  Med.  56:  483,  1932. 
Murphy,  J.  B. :  A  Source  of  Defense  to  Heteroplastic  Tissue  Grafting,  J.  A.  M.  A. 

59:  874,  1912;  62:  199,  1914;  J.  Exp.  Med.  17:  482,  1913. 
Murphy,  J.  B. :  Heteroplastic  Tissue  Grafting  Effected  Through  Roentgen  Ray 

Lymphoid  Destruction,  J.  A.  M.  A.  62:  1459,  1914. 
Murphy,  J.  B.  and  J.  J.  Morton  :  The  Lymphocytes  as  a  Factor  in  Natural  and 

Induced  Resistance  to  Transplanted  Cancer,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sc.  1 :  435, 

1915;  J.  Exp.  Med.  22:  204,  1915. 
Murphy,  J.  B. :  The  Lymphocyte  in  Resistance  to  Tissue  Grafting,  Malignant 

Disease,   and  Tuberculous   infection,   Monograph  21,   Rockefeller   Institute 

1926. 
Murphy,  J.  B. :  Factors  in  Resistance  to  Heteroplastic  Tissue  Grafting,  J.  Exp. 

Med.   19:   181,   1914;   19:  513,   1914;  The  Effect  of  Adult  Chicken  Organ 

Grafted  on  the  Chick  Embryo,  J.  Exp.  Med.  24:  1,  1916. 
Murphy,  J.  B. :  Transplantability  of  Tissues  to  the  Embryo  of  Foreign  Species ; 

Tumor  immunity,  Jr.  Exp.  Med.  17:  482,  1913. 
Murphy,  J.  B.  and  Ernest  Sturm  :  Conditions  Determining  Transplantability  of 

Tissues  in  the  Brain,  J.  Exp.  Med.  28:  183,  1923. 
Myer,  Max,  W. :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Kidney  in  Guinea  Pig,  Arch. 

f.  Entwicklgsmech.  38:  1,  1913. 

N 

v.  Naegeli,  C. :  Mechanisch-physiol.  Theorie  d.  Abstammungslehre,  Munchen  u. 

Leipzig  1884. 
Naegeli,   Oscar  F.  de  Quervain   and  W.   Stalder:   Cellular  Localization  of 

Allergy,  Klin.  Woch.  9:  924,  1930. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  685 

Nather,  Karl:  Attempts  at  Immunization  Against  Transplanted  Tumors  with 

Weakened  and  Killed  Carcinoma  Cells  and  Autolysates,  Zeitschr.  f.  Krebs- 

forsch.  19:  115,  1922. 
Needham,  J. :  Chemistry  and  Biology  of  Organismal  Growth,  Proc.  Roy.  Soc. 

Med.  29:  1577,  1936. 
Neumann,  H.  O. :  Transplantation  of  Uterine  Mucosa.  Virch.  Arch.  272:  265, 

1929. 
Neurath,  A. :  Shape  of  Protein  Molecule,  J.  Am.  Chem.  Soc.  61 :  184,  1939. 
Newman,  H.  H. :  Production  of  Monsters  by  Hybridization,  Biol.  Bullet.  32:  306, 

1917;  Inheritance  in  Teleost  Hybrids,  J.  Exp.  Zoology  16:  447,  1914. 
Niekau,  B.  and  L.  Duschl:  Haematol,  u.  pathol.-anatom.  Studies  in  Parabiotic 

Rats,  D.  Zeitschr.  f.  Chir.  191 :  221,  1925. 
Nilson,  H.  W.  and  D.  I.  Ingle:  Auto,  Syngenesio  and  Homoiotransplantation  of 

Adrenal  Cortex  in  Rats,  Science  84:  424,  1936. 
Nissen,  R. :  Lymph  Glands  and  Bone  Marrow  in  Parabiosis,  Zeitschr.  f.  d.  ges. 

Exper.  Med.  35:  251,  1923;  D.  Zeitschr.  f.  Chir.  19:  197,  1925. 
Northrop,  J.  H. :  Chemistry  of  Enzymes,  Columbia  University  Press,  1939. 
Noble,  G.  K. :  Neural  Basis  of  Social  Behavior  in  Vertebrates,  Collecting  Net, 

14:  121,  1939. 
Noble,  G.  K. :  The  Experimental  Animal  from  the  Naturalist's  Point  of  View, 

the  Instinctive  Basis  of  Human  Actions,  Am.  Naturalist  73:  113,  1939. 
Noble,  G.  K.  and  Brian  Curtis  :  Social  Behavior  of  Jewel  Fish.  Bullet.  Am.  Mus. 

Nat.  History  76 :  1,  1939. 
Noble,  G.  K.,  M.  Warm  and  A.  Schmidt:  Social  Behavior  of  the  Black  Crowned 

Night  Heron,  The  Auk  55 :  7,  1938. 


Oberling,  C,  M.  Guerin  and  P.  Guerin:  Transplantation  of  Mammary  Fibro- 
adenoma in  Rats;  Bullet.  Assoc,  franc,  p.  l'etude  du  Cancer,  26:  483,  1937. 
Obermayer,  F.  and  E.  P.  Pick:  Precipitin  Formation,  Wien.  Klin.  Woch.  16:  659, 

1903;  17:  265,  1904;  Precipitin  Reactions  and  Species  Specificity,  19:  327, 

1906. 
Ohli,  Masato  :  Organ  Specificity  of  Spermatozoa,  Okayama-Igakkai-Zasshi  43 : 

2441  and  2641, 1931. 
Ollier,  L.  J. :  Transplantation  and  Regeneration  of  Bone,  C.  R.  Acad.  d.  Sciences 

126:  1252  and  1316,  1898. 
Ollier,  L.  J. :  Traite  experiment,  de  la  regeneration  des  os  et  de  la  production 

artificielle  de  tissus  osseux,  Paris,  1867.  Bone  Transplants  in  Man,  Arch,  de 

Physiol,  norm,  et  path.  21 :  166,  1889. 
Opie,  E.  L. :  Significance  of  Allergy  in  Disease,  Medicine  15:  487,  1936. 
Orcutt,  M.  L.  and  P.  E.  Howe:  Globulins  and  Agglutinins  in  Blood  of  Calves, 

J.  Exp.  Med.  36:291,1922. 
Osborne,  H.  F. :  The  Creative  Principle  in  the  Origin  of  Species,  Science,  79 

41,  1934. 
Oshikawa,  K. :  Antibody  Formation  by  Transplants,  Z.  F.  Imm.  Forsch.  33 

297,  1922. 
Oshima,  T. :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Skin  in  Man,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  103 

440,  1914. 
Ottensooser,  F.  and  E.  Strauss  :  Immunochemistry  of  Globin,  Biochem.  Zeitschr 

193 :  426,  1928. 


Parker,  G.   H. :  Humoral  Agents  in  Nervous  Activity,  Cambridge  University 
Press,  1932. 


686  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Parker,  R.  C. :  Stability  of  Functionally  Distinct  Races  of  Fibroblasts,  Science, 
76:  219  and  446,  1932. 

Pauling,  Linus  and  C.  Niemann:  Structure  of  Protein,  J.  Am.  Chem.  Soc.  61: 
I860,'  1939. 

Pauling,  Linus  and  D.  H.  Campbell:  Production  of  Antibodies  in  Vitro,  J. 
Exp.  Med.  76:211,  1942. 

Peebles,  Florence:  Regeneration  and  Grafting  in  Hydrozoa,  Arch.  f.  Entwick- 
lgsmech.  10:  435,  1900;  14;  49,  1902. 

Perkin,  E.  B.  and  B.  Kropp:  The  Crustacean  Eye  Hormone  as  a  Vertebrate 
Melanophore  Activator,  Biol.  Bullet.  63:   108,   1932. 

Perthes,  Georg:  Homoiogenous  Transplantation  of  Skin,  Centralbl.  f.  Chir.  44: 
426,  1917. 

Pfeiffer,  C.  A.:  Hormones  and  Transplantation  (ovaries)  (age  and  transplanta- 
tion), Am.  J.  Anat.  55:  195,  1936;  (testicles)  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and 
Med.  32:603,  1935. 

Pillemer,  L.  and  E.  E.  Ecker:  Specificity  of  Keratin,  Science  88:  16,  1938. 

Pirschle,  Karl:  Grafting  Experiments  with  Petunia,  Naturwissenschaften.  26: 
629,  1938. 

Plant,  F. :  Antisera  Against  Brain,  Klin.  Woch.  8:  1801,  1929. 

Poll,  H. :  Skin  Patterns,  Hereditary  Skin  Diseases  and  Malformations,  Dermat. 
Woch.  89 :  849,  1927. 

Pressman,  D.,  D.  H.  Campbell  and  Linus  Pauling:  Mechanism  of  Immune 
Agglutination,  J.  Immunol.  44:  101,  1942. 

Prowazek,  S. :  Coalescence  of  Protoplasm  in  Algae,  Biol.  Centralbl.  27 :  737, 
1907. 

Putnoky,  J.:  Growth  of  Mouse  Carcinoma  in  Rats,  Am.  J.  Cancer  32:  35,  1938; 
38:  191,1940. 

Pybus,  F.  C.  and  H.  R.  Whitehead:  Immune  Reactions  and  Cancer,  J.  Path, 
and  Bact.  32:  195,  1929. 

R 

Rabes,  Otto:  Transplantation  in  Lumbricidae,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  13: 
239,  1902. 

Rabl:  Homologie  und  Eigenart,  Verh.  d.  deutsch.  pathol.  Gesellschaft.  II  Jahr- 
gang,  1899.  (Centralbl.  f.  Allgem.  Pathol.  10:  831,  1899.) 

Raffel,  D. :  Gene  Mutations  in  Paramecium  Aurelia,  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  63:  371,  1932; 
Biol.  Bullet,  62:244,  1932. 

Rand,  H.  W. :  Inhibiting  Agencies  in  Ontogeny  and  Regeneration,  Anat.  Record 
29:98,  1924-25. 

Rand,  H.  W.  and  Mildred  Ellis  :  Form  Determining  Dominance  in  Transplanta- 
tion in  Planarians,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.  12:  570,  1926. 

Rand,  H.  W.  and  E.  Browne:  Inhibition  of  Regeneration  in  Planarians  by  Graft- 
ing, Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sci.  12:  575,  1926. 

Raper,  J.  R. :  Hormones  in  the  Sexual  Reactions  of  Heterothallic  Achlyas, 
Science,  89:321,  1939. 

Reed,  Sheldon,  C.  and  J.  M.  Henderson  :  Skin  Grafting  and  Pigment  Cell  Mi- 
gration, J.  Exp.  Zool.  85 :  409,  1940. 

Rehn,  E.  and  A.  Wakabagashi:  Syngenesiotransplantation  of  Bone  and  Joint, 
Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  97:  1,  1912. 

Rehn,  E. :  Transplantation  of  Fat  Tissue  in  Rabbits,  Arch.  Klin.  Chir.  97:  35, 
1912. 

Renner,  O. :  Inheritance  in  Species  Hybrids,  Zeitschr.  f.  inductive  Abstammungs. 
u.  Vererbgslehre,  32 :  317,  1923. 

Reynolds,  B.  D. :  Interaction  of  Protoplasmic  Masses  in  Arcella  Polyposa,  Biol. 
Bullet.  46 :  106,  1924. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  687 

Ribbert,  Hugo:  Transplantation  of  Ovaries,  Testicles,  Mammary  Gland,  Arch. 
f.  Entwicklgsmech.  7:  688,  1898. 

Ribbert,  H. :  Transplantation  of  Fibroma  in  Dog,  Centralbl.  f.  allg.  Pathol,  u. 
path.  Anat.  21 :  625,  1910. 

Ribbert,  H. :  Compensatory  Hypertrophy  and  Regeneration,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech.  1 :  69,  1895. 

Rich,  A.  R.  and  M.  R.  Lewis:  Nature  of  Allergy  in  Tuberculosis  as  Revealed 
by  Tissue  Culture  Studies,  Bull.  Johns  Hopkins  Hosp.  50:  115,  1932. 

Richter,  M.  N.  and  H.  L.  Jaffe:  Transplantation  of  Thymus  into  Bone  Mar- 
row, J.  Exp.  Med.  47:  981,  1928;  Regeneration  of  Autoplastic  Lymphoid 
Transplants,  J.  Exp.  Med.  47:  977,  1928. 

Richter,  M.  N.  and  E.  C.  MacDowell  :  Experiments  with  Mammalian  Leukemia, 
Physiol.  Reviews,  15:  509,  1935. 

Ries,  Erich  :  Regeneration,  Reduction  and  Budding  in  Clavellina,  Arch.  f. 
Entwicklgsmech.  137:  326,  1937-38. 

Ries,  Erich  :  Differentiation  of  Organs  and  Tissues  during  Embryonal  Develop- 
ment, Naturwissenschaften.  25:  241,  1937. 

Ries,  Erich  :  Experimental  Study  of  Symbiosis ;  Transplantation  of  Mycetoma, 
J.  Morphol.  u.  Okol.  d.  Tiere  25 :  184,  1932. 

Riess,  E.  Transplantation  of  Periosteum,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  129;  750,  1924. 

Rife,  D.  C. :  Handedness  of  Twins,  Science  89:  179,  1939. 

Ritter,  E. :  Analysis  of  Coloration  in  White  Axolotl,  Naturwissenschaften.  17: 
874,  1929. 

Rivers,  T.  M. :  Virus  Diseases  (Species  and  tissue  specificity  of  viruses), 
J.  A.M.  A.  107:206,1936. 

Robb,  C.  K. :  Growth  of  Parts  in  Relation  to  the  Whole,  Brit.  J.  Exp.  Biol.,  6: 
311,  1929. 

Robbins,  W. :  Heterosis,  Am.  J.  Bot.  28 :  216,  1941. 

Robbins,  W.  J.:  Thiamin  and  Plant  Growth;  Specificity  in  the  Power  to  Syn- 
thesize Thiamin,  Science,  89:  303,  1939. 

Robinson,  G.  H.  and  R.  C.  Grauer:  Transplantable  Benign  Adenomas  in  Rat; 
Am.  J.  Cancer  16:  184  and  191,  1932. 

Rohde,  Carl:  Homoiotransplantation,  Parabiosis,  Blood  Groups,  Beitr.  z.  Klin. 
Chir.  134:  111,  1925.  Transplantation  of  Bone,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  129:  435, 
1924. 

Roessle.  R. :  Chemical  Individuality  of  Embryonal  Cells,  Miinch.  Med.  Woch. 
52:  1276,  1905. 

Roffo,  A.  H. :  Transformation  of  a  Race  of  Rats  Non-Receptive  to  Cancer  into 
a  Receptive  Race,  C.R.  Soc.  Biol.  83 :  968,  1920. 

Rothen,  A.  and  K.  Landsteiner:  Adsorption  of  Antibodies  by  Egg  Albumin 
Films,  Science  90:  65,  1939. 

Rous,  Peyton  and  J.  B.  Murphy:  Tumor  Implantations  in  the  Developing 
Embryo,  J. A.M. A.  56:  741,  1911. 

Rous,  Peyton,  and  O.  S.  Robertson:  Production  of  Homoiogenous  Antibodies 
in  Rabbits :  Free  Antigen  and  Antibody  Circulating  Together,  J.  Exp.  Med. 
27:509,  1918. 

Rous,  Peyton:  Comparison  of  Transplanted  Tumor  and  of  Embryonal  Tissue 
Transplants  in  Mouse,  J.  Exp.  Med.  12:  344,  1910. 

Rous,  Peyton:  Sarcoma  of  the  Fowl  Transmissible  by  an  Agent  Separated  from 
the  Tumor  Cell,  J.  Exp.  Med.  13:  397,  1911. 

Rous,  Peyton  and  J.  B.  Murphy:  Histological  Signs  of  Resistance  to  Transmis- 
sible Sarcoma  of  Fowl,  J.  Exp.  Med.  15:  270,  1912. 

Rous,  Peyton:  A  Transmissible  Avian  Neoplasm,  J.  Exp.  Med.  12:  696,  1910. 

Rous,  Peyton  :  Transmission  of  a  Malignant  Newgrowth  by  Means  of  a  Cell- 
free  Filtrate,  J.  A.  M.  A.  56:  198,  1911. 


688  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Rous,  Peyton:  The  Virus  Tumors  and  the  Tumor  Problem,  Am.  J.  Cancer  28: 
233,  1936. 

Roux,  W.:  Cytotropism,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  1:  43,  161,  1895;  3:  381,  1896. 

Rubens-Duval,  H. :  Local  and  General  Reactions  of  the  Organism  Against  Can- 
cer, Rapport  Congres  du  Cancer,  Strassbourg  1923,  Paris. 

Russ,  S.  and  G.  M.  Scott:  Cross  Immunity  with  Rat  Tumors,  J.  Path.  &  Bact. 
30 :  564,  1927. 

Russ,  S.,  Helen  Chambers,  and  G.  M.  Scott:  Local  and  Generalized  Action 
of  Radium  and  X-rays  upon  Tumor  Growth,  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  92:  125,  1921. 


Sabin,  A.  B.  and  P.  K.  Olitzky:  Cultivation  of  Poliomyelitis  Virus  in  Vitro  in 

Human  Embryonic  Nervous  Tissue  (organ  specificity  of  virus),  Proc.  Soc. 

Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  34:  357,  1936. 
Sachs,  Hans:  Age  Differences  in  Blood,  Centralbl.  Bakt.  34:  686,  1903. 
Sachs,  H. :  Species  and  Individuality  Differentials  as  Antigens ;  Their  Chemical 

Constitution,  Wiener  Klin.  Wochenschr.  41 :  431,  1928. 
Sale,  Llewellyn:  Autogenous  and  Homoiogenous  Transplantation  of  Pigmented 

Skin  in  Guinea  Pigs,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  37:  248,  1913. 
Saltykow,  S. :  Transplantation  of  Tails  of  Embryos  or  Adult  Rats  and  Mice; 

Effect  of  Age.  Arch,  f .  Entwicklgsmech.  9 :  329,  1900. 
Salzer,  H. :  Transplantation  of  Thyroid,  Arch.  f.  klin.  Chir.  83:  881,  1909. 
Sampson,   M.   M. :   Iso  and   Heteroagglutination  of   Spermatozoa  by  Egg  Ex- 
tracts, Biol.  Bullet.  43 :  267,  1922. 
Sandstrom,  C.  J.:  Chorio-allantoic  Transplantation,  Anat.  Rec.  (supplement)  54: 

59,  1932;  Biol.  Bullet.  79:  329,  1940. 
Santos,  F.  V.:  Transplantation  in  Planaria,  Biol.  Bullet.  57:  188,  1929;  Physiol. 

Zoology,  4:  111,1931. 
Sauerbruch,  F.  and  M.  Heyde:  Parabiosis  (Ileus  and  uremia),  Ztschr.  f.  exp. 

Path.  u.  Ther.  6 :  33,  1909. 
Sauerbruch,    F.   and   M.   Heyde:   Parabiosis    (Causes   of   induction  of  labor) 

Munch.  Med.  Woch.  57:  2617,  1910. 
Sauerbruch,    F. :   Cellular    Defensive    Processes    in    Parabiosis,    Munch.    Med. 

Woch.  70 :  860,  1923. 
Saxton,  J.  A.,  Jr.,  M.  M.  Schmeckebier,  and  R.  W.  Kelley:  Transplantation 

of  Autogenous  Pigmented  and  Unpigmented  Ear  Skin  in  Guinea  Pigs,  Biol. 

Bullet.  71 :  453,  1936. 
Schaxel,  J. :  Transplantation  and  Pigmentation  of  Skin  in  Axolotls,  Verhandl. 

d.  deutsch.  Zool.  Gesellschft.  28-31 :  32,  1923-26. 
Schaxel,    J.:    Transplantation    of   Regenerating   Buds    in    Different    Races   of 

Axolotl,  Verh.  d.  deutsch.  Zool.  Gesellsch.  28:  55,  1923.  Inhibition  of  Re- 
generation in  Urodeles,  Zool.  Anzeiger  56 :  128,  1923. 
Schenck,  E.  G. :  Constitution  of  Globin  in  Animals  and  Man,  Arch.  exp.  Path. 

u.  Pharmak.  150:  160,  1930.  Genealogy  of  Proteins,  Naturwissenschaften  18: 

824,  1930. 
Schermer,   S.   and  O.   Hofferber:   Blood   Group   of   Horse,  Zeitsch.   f.   Imm. 

forsch.  67:  497,  1930. 
Schermer,  S.  and  A.  Kaempffer:  Blood  Groups  of  the  Horse,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm. 

forsch.  80:  146,1933. 
Schermer,  S.,  W.  Kayser,  and  A.  Kaempffer:  Isoagglutinins  in  Blood  of  Man 

and  Hog,  Zeitschr.  f .  Imm.  forsch.  68 :  437,  1930. 
Schiff,  F. :  Mode  of  Inheritance  of  Factors  M  and  N,  Klin.  Woch.  9:  1956,  1930. 
Schiff,  F.  and  O.  v.  Verschuer:  Blood  Groups  in  Twins,  Klin.  Woch.  10:  723, 

1931. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  689 

Schmidt,  Georg:  Parabiosis,  D.  Zeitschr.  f.  Chir.  171:  141,  1922. 

Schoene,   G. :   Transplantation  of   Non-Autogenous   Tissues,  Verh.   d.   deutsch. 

Gesellsch.  f.  Chir.  37:  174,  1908.  Transplantation  of  tumors  and  normal  tis- 
sues,  Beitr.   z.   klin.   Chir.   61 :    1,    1909.   Transplantation   Immunity,   Munch. 

Med.   Wochenschr.  59:  457,  1912.  Hair  in  Skin  Grafts,  Zeitschr.  f.  d.  ges. 

exp.  Med.  1:  444,  1913.  Syngenesiotransplantation,  Beitr.  z.  Klin.  Chir.,  99: 

233,  1916. 
Schoene,  G. :  Immunization  Against  Transplants  of  Cancerous  Tissues  by  Inocu- 
lation of  Normal   Cells,   Verhandl.  d.  deutsch.  Gesellsch.  f.  Chir.  36:  213, 

1907. 
Schotte,  O.  E.  and  K.  P.  Hummel:  Lens  Induction  at  Expense  of  Regenerating 

Tissues  of  Amphibians,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  80 :  131,  1939. 
Schultz,  W. :  Transplantation  and  Hybridization,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  35: 

484,  1912;  36:  353,  1913;  37:  285,  1913;  41:  120,  1915;  43:  361,  1917-18. 
Schultz,  W. :  Transplantation  of  Ovaries  to  Different  Species  and  Varieties, 

Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.,  29:  79,  1910. 
Schulze,  Werner  :  Parabiosis,  Klin.  Woch.  1 :  2007  and  2052,  1922. 
Schweitzer,  M.  D.  and  J.  Furth  :  Susceptibility  to  Transmitted  Leukemia  in 

Inbred  Mice,  Am.  J.  Cancer  37:  224,  1939. 
Schwind,  J.  L. :   Heterotransplantation  of  Limb  and  Shoulder  Girdle  of  Am- 

blystoma,  J.  Exp.  Zool.,  59:  265,  1931. 
Secerov,  S. :  Transplantation  of  Skin  and  Change  in  Coloration  in  Fish,  Arch.  f. 

Entwicklgsmech.,  33:  716,  1912. 
Seelig,  M.  G. :  Autogenous  and  Homoiogenous  Transplantation  of  White  Skin 

in  Guinea  Pigs,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  37:  259,  1913. 
Seevers,  C.  H.  and  D.  A.  Spencer  :  Autoplastic  Transplantation  of  Guinea  Pig 

Skin  Between  Regions  with  Different  Characters,  Am.  Naturalist  66:  183, 

1932. 
Selter,   G.   E. :    Chemical   Antigens   and   Lipoid   Antibodies,   Zeitschr.    f.    Imm. 

forsch.  68 :  409,  1930. 
Shaw-Mackenzie,  J.  A.:  Immunity  and  Malignant  Tumors,  Lancet  256,  1926. 
Shawan,  H.  K. :  Skin  Grafting  and  Blood  Groups,  Am.  J.  Med.  Sciences  157: 

503,  1919. 
Shen,  Gertrud:  Regulation  in  Early  Gastrula  of  Triton  and  origin  of  Cyclopia, 

Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  137:  271,  1937-38. 
Shimidzu,  Takeo:   Haemagglutination  in  Animals,  Tohoku  J.  Exp.  Med.   18: 

27,  1931-32. 
Shiple,   G.  and  C.  P.   Sherwin:  Phenylacetic  Acid,  its  Mode  of  Elimination, 

J.  Am.  Chem.  Soc.  44:  618,  1922. 
Shirai,  Y. :  Transplantation  of  Rat  Sarcoma  into  Brain,  Japan.  Med.  World, 

No.  2,  page  14,  1921  (cited  from  Woglom,  Cancer  Review  1929). 
Shull,  G.  H. :  The  Genotypes  of  Maize,  Am.  Naturalist,  45:  234,  1911. 
Siebert,  W.  J. :  Auto  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Thyroid  Gland  into  Brain 

of  Guinea  Pigs,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  26:  236,  1928. 
Siebert,  W.  J.:  Effects  of  Graded  Degrees  of  Heat  on  the  Results  of  Homoio 

and  Heterotransplantation  of  Cartilage  and  Thyroid,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol. 

&  Med.  26:  238,  1928;  Arch.  Path.  12:  590,  1931. 
Silberberg,  Martin  :  Causes  and  Mechanisms  of  Thrombosis,  Physiol.  Reviews 

18 :  197,  1928. 
Silberberg,  Martin  :  Influence  of  Anterior  Pituitary  Extract  on  Autotransplan- 

tation  and  Homoiotransplantation  of  Thyroid,  Arch.  Path.  17:  381,  1934. 
Simmonet,  H.  and  J.  Pretresco:  Parabiosis,  Bullet,  et  Memoires  de  la  section 

d'endocrinology  21 :  417,  1938. 
Simpson,  G.  G. :  The  Role  of  the  Individual  in  Evolution,  J.  Washington  Acad. 

Sci.  31 :  1,  1941. 


690  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Smirnova,   E. :   Heterogenous  Transplantation  of  Malignant  Tumors  into  An- 
terior Chamber  of  Eye,  Bullet,  de  Biologic  ct  de  m^decine  exper.  4:  6,  1937. 

Smith,  E.  L. :  Solution  of  Chlorophyll-protein  Compounds,  Science  88,  170,  1938. 

Smith,  P.  E. :   Parabiosis  Between  Hypophysectomized  and  Normal  Tadpoles, 
Anat.  Record  21 :  83,  1921. 

Smith,  Theobald  and  R.  B.  Little:  Protective  Effect  of  Colostrum  in  New- 
born Calf,  J.  Exp.  Med.  36:  181,  1922. 

Smith,  Theobald  and  R.  B.  Little:  Cow  Serum  as  Substitute  for  Colostrum, 
J.  Exp.  Med.  36:453,  1922. 

Sonneborn,  T.  M. :  Sexuality  and  Genetics  in  Paramaecium  Aurelia,  Proc.  Am. 
Philos.Soc.  79:411,  1938. 

Sonneborn,   T.   M.   and   R.   S.   Lynch  :   Racial   Differences   in   Conjugation  in 
Paramaecium  Aurelia,  Biol.  Bullet.  62:  258,  1932. 

Spangler,  J.  M.,  J.  M.  Murray,  and  C.  C.  Little:  Genetics  of  Susceptibility  to 
Transplanted  Tumors,  J.  Nat.  Cancer  Inst.  3:  123,  1942. 

Spek,  Josef  :  Winter  buds,  Regeneration  and  Totipotent  cells  in  Clavellina,  Arch. 
f.  Entwicklgsmech.  Ill :  119,  1927. 

Spemann,    H.    and    O.    Schotte:    Xenoplastic    Transplantation,    Naturwissen- 
schaften20:463,  1932. 

Spemann,  H. :  Transplantation  in  Larvae  of  Triton :  Species  and  Organ  Speci- 
ficity, Naturwissenschaften  7:  581,  1919. 

Spemann,  H. :  Chimaerae  Produced  Through  Embryonal  Heterotransplantation 
in  Triton,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  48:  533,  1921. 

Spemann,  H.  and  H.  Mangold:  Implantation  of  Heterogenous  Organizers  in 
Triton,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  100:  599,  1924. 

Spemann,  H.  and  B.  Geinitz:  Heterogenous  Transplantation  and  Organization, 
Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  109:  129,  1927. 

Stakman,  E.  C. :  Plant  Disease  Fungi  Constantly  Evolving  New  Types,  Science 
88:438,  1938. 

Steinach,  E. :  Feminization  of  Male  Guinea  Pigs  and  Rats  Through  Transplan- 
tation of  Ovaries,  Arch.  f.  Physiol.  144:  71,  1912. 

Steinecke,  Fr.  :  Serodiagnosis  of  Plant  Proteins  and  Phylogenetic  Development 
of  Plants,  Naturwissenschaften  13:  853,  1925. 

Stern,  Kurt  and  R.  W.  G.  Wyckoff:  Specificity  of  Catalase,  Science  87:  18, 
1938. 

Stern,   L. :   The   Functioning  of  Barrier  Between   Blood   and  Brain,  Schweiz. 
Med.  Woch.  59 :  935,  1929. 

Stevenson,  H.  W. :  Tumor  Immunity  in  Chick  Embryo,  J.  Cancer  Research,  2: 
449,  1917;  3:  63,  1918. 

Stilling,  H. :  Transplantation  of  Adrenal  into  Testicle,  Beitr.  z.  path.  Anatomie, 
37:480,  1905. 

Stone,  L.  S.  and  P.  Saphir:  Regeneration  of  Lens  of  Eye  of  Anurans,  Urodeles 
and  Fishes,  J.  Exper.  Zoolog.  85  :  71,  1940. 

Stout,  A.  B.  and  Clyde  Chandler:  Tetraploidy  and  Compatibility  in  Fertiliza- 
tion in  Plants,  Science  94:  118,  1941 ;  96:  257,  1942. 

Strong,  L.  C. :  Genetics  of  Pituitary  and  Ovarian  Grafts,  J.  Heredity,  27:  219, 
1936. 

Strong,  L.  C. :  Transplantation  of  Two  Tumors  Originating  in  the  Same  Mouse ; 
Somatic  Mutations,  J.  Cancer  Research,  13 :  103,  1929. 

Strong,   L.   C. :   Tissue   Specificity  in  Transplantation   of  Tumors ;   its   Genetic 
Basis,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  36:  67,  1922;  J.  Exp.  Med.  39:  447,  1924. 
Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sciences,  12:  181,  1926;  J.  Exp.  Zool.  45:  231,  1926. 

Strong,  L.  C.  and  C.  C.  Little:  Tests  for  Physiological  Differences  in  Trans- 
planted Tumors,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  18:  45,  1920. 

Strong,  L.  C,  R.  T.  Hill,  C.  A.  Pfeiffer,  and  W.  U.  Gardner:  Genetic  and 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  691 

Endocrine  Studies  on  a  Transplantable  Carcinoma  of  Ovary,  Genetics  23: 
585,  1938. 

Strong,  L.  C. :  Genetic  Study  of  Transplantation  and  Origin  of  Tumors,  J.  Can- 
cer Res.  10 :  219,  1926. 

Stunkard,  W.  H.  and  C.  H.  Willey:  Immunity  to  Infection  with  Heterophyid 
Trematodes,  Biol.  Bullet.  81 :  279,  1941. 

Summers,  F.  M. :  Normal  and  Regulative  Development  in  the  Colonial  Ciliate, 
Zoothamnium  Alternans,  Biol.  Bullet.  73:  354,  1937. 

Sumner,  F.  B. :  Genetic  and  Distributional  Studies  on  Peromyscus,  J.  of  Genetics 
23 :  275,  1930. 

Sumner,  J.  B.  and  J.  S.  Kirk:  Antienzymes,  Science  74:  102,  1931. 

Sumner,  J.  B. :  Isolation  and  Crystallization  of  Urease,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  69:  435, 
1926. 

Sussman,  Ph.  O. :  Individual  Differentiation  of  Protein  by  Means  of  Precipi- 
tates, Wiirzb.  Abhandl.  aus  d.  ges.  Gebiet  d.  Med.  22:  297,  1925. 


Takakusu,    S. :    Internal    Secretion    in   Parabiotic   Rabbits,    Biochem.   Zeitschr. 

128:  1,  1922. 
Takewaki,   K. :   Endocrine  Factors   in  Transplantation  of  Ovaries,  J.   Faculty 

Science,  Univ.  Tokyo  3:  155,  1933. 
Takewaki,  K. :  Ovary  in  Parabiosis  of  Rats,  Faculty  of  Science,  Imp.  Univ. 

Tokyo  3:  153,  1933. 
Taliaferro,  W.  H.  and  Clay  G.  Huff:  Genetics  of  Parasitic  Protozoa.  Am. 

Assoc.  Advancement  of  Science,  Publ.  No.  12,  p.  57,  1940. 
Taube,  E. :  Transplantation  of  Amphibian  Skin,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  98: 

98,  1920;  49:  270,  1921. 
Taylor,  Alfred,  J.  Thacker,  and  D.  Pennington  :  Growth  of  Cancer  Tissue 

in  Yolk  Sac  of  Chick  Embryo,  Science  96 :  342,  1942. 
Ten  Broeck,  C. :  Enzymes  (trypsins)  as  Antigens  in  Anaphylactic  Reactions  in 

Vitro,  J.  Biol.  Chem.  106 :  729,  1934. 
Tennent,   D.   H. :  Heterogenous  Fertilization  and  Hybrids  in  Echinoderms,  J. 

Exp.  Zool.  12:  391,  1912;  J.  Morphol.  23:  17,  1912;  Carnegie  Inst.  Public 

No.  391,  p.  105,  1929;  Scientific  Monthly  p.  117,  Aug.  1929. 
Thiersch:  Skin  Grafting,  Arch.  f.  Klin.  Chir.  17:  318,  1874.  Successful  Trans- 
plantation of  White   Skin  on   Negroes  and  vice  versa,   Verh.   d.  deutsch. 

Gesellsch.f.  Chir.  15:17,  1886. 
Thomoff,  Z.  Individuality  Reaction  and  Serum  Therapy,  Zeitsch.  f.  Imm.  forsch. 

67:  396,  1936. 
Thomsen,  O.  and  T.  Kemp:  Differentiation  of  Blood  Groups  in  Animals,  Zeitsch. 

f.  Imm.  forsch.  67:251,1930. 
Thurston,  E.  W.,  J.  E.  Smadel,  and  Leo  Loeb:  Inhibiting  Action  of  Serum  on 

Tissue  Extracts  in  the  Coagulation  of  Blood,  Am.  J.  Physiol.  114:  19,  1935. 
Tillett,  W.  S.  and  R.  L.  Garner:  Fibrinolysins  of  Streptococci,  J.  Exp.  Med. 

58 :  485,  1933 ;  60 :  239  and  255,  1934. 
Tirala,  L.  G. :  Transplantation  in  Criodilus,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  35 :  523, 

1912. 
Tiselius,  A.  and  E.  A.  Kabat:  Electrophoresis  of  Immune  Serum    Science  87: 

416,  1938. 
Todd,  Ch.:  Individuality  of  Red  Corpuscles,  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  B.  106:  20,  1930; 

107:  197,1930;  117:358,1935. 
Todd,  Ch.  and  R.  G.  White:  Hemolytic  Immune  Isolysins  in  Ox,  Am.  J.  Hyg. 

10:  185,  1910;  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  Ser.  B  82:  416,  1910. 
Todd,  Ch.  :  Recognition  of  the  Individual  by  Hemolytic  Methods.  J.  Genet.  3 : 

123,  1913-14. 


692  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Travis  L.  E.  and  Abraham  Gottlober:  Individuality  of  Brain  Waves,  Science 
84!  532,  1936. 

Treibman,  W. :  Immunization  of  Rabbits  Against  Human  A  Factor,  Zeitschr.  f. 
Imm.  forsch.  79:274,  1933. 

Turck,  F.  B. :  The  Action  of  the  Living  Cell,  New  York,  1933. 

Tschernischoff,  A.:  Transplantation  of  Ovaries,  Ziegler's  Beitr.  z.  path.  Anat. 
59:  162,  1914. 

von  Tschermak,  A.  :  Allgemeine  Physiologie,  Berlin  1916. 

Tureen,  L.  L. :  Effect  of  Age  of  Host  on  Fate  of  Thyroid  Transplants  in  Guinea 
Pigs.  Am.  J.  Path.  3:  501,  1927. 

Turner,  C.  D. :  Intraocular  Transplantation  of  Gonads  and  Sex  Accessories 
from  Mouse  to  Rat,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  36:  314,  1937.  Trans- 
plantation of  Suprarenal  Glands  of  Rat  into  Anterior  Chamber  of  Eye,  Proc. 
Soc.  Exp.  Biol.  &  Med.  39:  133,  1938.  Intraocular  Transplantation  of  Pre- 
pubertal Testes  in  the  Rat,  Am.  J.  Anat.  63:  101,  1938.  Homoiotransplanta- 
tion  of  Suprarenal  Glands  from  Prepubertal  Rats  into  Eyes  of  Adult  Hosts, 
Anat.  Record,  73 :  145,  1939. 

Turner,  C.  D.,  R.  Haffen,  and  L.  S.  Amant:  Persistence  of  Medullary  Tissue 
in  Homoiotransplanted  Adrenals,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  41 :  474, 
1939. 

Twitty,  V.  C.  and  J.  L.  Schwind:  Growth  of  Heterotransplanted  Eyes  and 
Limbs  in  Amblystoma,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  59:  61,  1931. 

Twitty,  V.  C. :  Growth  Directing  Substances  and  Transplantation  in  Amphibia, 
Cold  Spring  Harbor  Symposia  on  quantit.  Biol.  2:  148,  1934. 

Twitty,  V.  C.  and  H.  H.  Johnson:  Motor  Inhibition  in  Amblystoma  Produced 
by  Triturus  Transplants,  Science  80:  78,  1934. 

Tyler,  Albert:  Fertilizin  and  Specific  Adaptation,  Proc.  Nat.  Acad.  Sciences 
25:  317,  1939;  20:  39,  1942;  Biol.  Bullet.  81:  190,  1941. 

Tyzzer,  E.  E. :  Role  of  Inflammation  in  Immunity  of  Mice  to  Transplanted 
Tumors,  J.  Cancer  Research  1 :  117,  1916. 

U 

von  Ubisch,  L. :  Germ  Layer-chimaerae,  Naturwissenschaften  21 :  325,  1933. 
von  Ubisch,  L. :  Reciprocal  Chimaerae  of  Echinocyanus  and  Parechinus,  Arch. 

f.  Entwicklgsmech.  129 :  68,  1933. 
Uhlenhuth,   Eduard:    Metamorphosis   of   Transplanted   Eyes   in   Salamander, 

Arch.  f.  Entwicklgsmech.  36:  211,  1913;  J.  Gen.  Physiol.  1:  525,  1918-19. 
Uhlenhuth   and   Seiffert:   Immunity  Against  Transplantable   Tumors,   Med. 

Klin.  21 :  576,  1925. 
Underwood,  H.  L. :  Anaphylaxis  Following  Skin  Grafting  for  Burns,  J.  A.  M.  A. 

63:  775,  1914. 
Urbach,  E.  and  H.  Schnitzler:  Intracutaneous  Immunization  of  Mouse  Against 

Cancer  Tissue,  Wien.  Kiin.  Woch.  41 :  941,  1928. 


Veblen,  B.  B. :  Adaptive  Changes  of  Bacteria  to  Serum  Precipitins,  Proc.  Soc. 

Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  27:  204,  1929. 
von  Verschuer,  O. :  Constitution  and  Heredity,  Klin.  Woch.  8:  769,  1929. 
Verworn,  M. :  Transplantation  of  Nuclei,  Pfliiger's  Arch.  51:  115,  1892. 
Villata,  G. :  Effects  of  Trypan  Blue  in  Homoiotransplantation  of  Bone  in  Rats, 

Arch.  p.  1.  Science  med.  54:  401,  1930. 
Vogel,  H.  H.,  Jr.  :  Transplantation  of  Autogenous  and  Homoiogenous  Skin  in 

Adult  Rana  Pipiens,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  85 :  437,  1940. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  693 

Volker,  H.  u.  K.  Erichsen:  Transfusion  of  Surviving  Extremities  with 
Defibrinated  Blood,  Arch.  f.  exper.  Path.  u.  Pharmak.  127:  269,  1928. 

Voss,  H.  E. :  Endocrine  Function  of  Heterotransplanted  Organs,  Biologia  gener. 
3 :  571,  1927. 

W 

Waddington,  C.  H.,  J.  Needham,  and  D.  M.  Needham,  Physico-chemical  Nature 
of  Organizers,  Naturwissenschaften  21 :  771,  1933. 

Walsh,  L.  S.  N. :  Blood  Interrelationship  of  Horses,  Asses  and  Mules,  J. 
Immunol.  9 :  49,  1924. 

Warner,  S.  G.  and  M.  C.  Reinhardt:  Effect  of  X-rays  on  a  Tumor  of  Known 
Genetic  Constitution,  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  42:  673,  1939. 

Webster,  L.  T. :  Virus  of  Japanese  B.  Encephalitis,  of  St.  Louis  Encephalitis 
and  Louping  111  Virus,  Science  86:  202,  1937. 

Webster,  L.  T. :  Classification  of  Primary  Encephalitides  of  Man  According  to 
Virus  Etiology,  J.  A.  M.  A.  116 :  2840,  1941. 

Wedd,  B.  H.,  A.  C.  Morson,  and  S.  Russ:  Immunity  Conferred  Upon  Mice  by 
Radium  Irradiated  Mouse  Carcinoma,  J.  Path.  &  Bact.  18:  566,  1913-14. 

Weichardt,  W. :  Production  of  Isocytolysins,  Munch.  Med.  Wochenschr.  48: 
2035,  1901.  Individual  Blood  Differences,  Hyg.  Rundschau.  13:  756,  1903. 

Weigl,  R. :  Transplantation  and  Metamorphosis  of  Skin  in  Amphibia,  Arch.  f. 
Entwicklgsmech.  29:  620,  1910. 

Weijer,  Fr.  :  Races  and  Varieties  in  Mosquitos,  Naturwissenschaften  25 :  529, 
1937. 

Weil,  R.  and  C.  Bernheim  :  Hormone  Effects  on  Autotransplanted  Thyroid 
Glands  in  Guinea  Pigs,  C.R.  Soc.  Biol.  121 :  449,  1936. 

Weiss,  Ch.  :  Bacterium  Melaninogenicum,  Fibrinolysin  and  Serological  Types, 
Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.  37:473,  1937. 

Weiss,  Paul  :  Transplantation  of  Extremities  in  Amphibia,  Arch.  f.  Entwicklgs- 
mech. 99 :  168,  1923 ;  104 :  317,  1925. 

Wells,  H.  G.  and  T.  B.  Osborne:  Anaphylactic  Reactions  with  Proteins  of  Milk, 
J.  Inf.  Diseases  29:  200,  1921. 

Wells,  H.  G. :  Chemical  Constitution  and  Immunological  Reactions  of  Proteins, 
J.  Immunol.  1 :  467,  1916. 

Wells,  H.  G.  and  T.  B.  Osborne:  Anaphylactic  Reaction  with  Proteoses  of 
Seeds,  J.  Infect.  Diseases  17:  259,  1915. 

Wells,  H.  G.  and  T.  B.  Osborne:  Biological  Reaction  of  Vegetable  Proteins, 
J.  Infect.  Diseases  12:  341,  1913;  14:  377,  1914. 

Wells,  H.  G. :  Chemistry  of  Anaphylaxis;  Proteins  of  Hen's  Egg,  J.  Inf.  Dis- 
eases, 9:  147,  1911. 

Welsh,  J.  H. :  Specific  Influence  of  Host  on  Light  Response  of  Parasitic  Water 
Mites,  Biol.  Bullet.  61 :  497,  1931.  Laboratory  Experiment  in  Animal  Be- 
havior, Science,  75:  591,  1932. 

von  Wettstein,  F. :  Generic  Hybrids  in  Mosses,  Zeitschr.  f.  Induktive 
Abstammungs  u.  Vererbungslehre  33 :  253,  1924. 

von  Wettstein,  W. :  Effect  of  Hybridization  on  Resistance  to  Disease,  Natur- 
wissenschaften 25 :  434,  1937. 

von  Wettstein,  F. :  Inheritance  by  Means  of  Cytoplasm,  Naturwissenschaften 
19:280,  1931. 

Wetzel,  G. :  Transplantation  in  Hydra,  Arch.  f.  mikr.  Anat.  45 :  273,  1895. 

White,  P.  R. :  Growth  Without  and  With  Differentiation  in  Plants  in  the  Test 
Tube,  Science  89:  12,  1939. 

Wieman,  H.  L.  and  T.  C.  Nussman:  Heterotransplantation  of  Spinal  Cord  in 
Amblystoma  Embryos,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  53 :  45,  1929. 


694  THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 

Wiener,  A.  S. :  Rh  factor  in  Erythrocytes  and  Transfusions,  Arch.  Path.  32: 

227,'  1941. 
Wiener,  Maria,  C.  A.  Zittle,  and  Stuart  Mudd:  Antigenic  Structure  of  Hemo- 
lytic Streptococci ;  Type  Specific  M  Protein,  J.  Immunol.  45 :  29,  1942. 
Wigglesworth,  V.  B. :  Function  of  Corpus  Allatum  in  Growth  and  Reproduc- 
tion of  Rhodnius,  Quart.  J.  Micros.  Science  79:  91,  1936. 
Wildegans:  Transplantation  of  Skin,  Arch.  f.  klin.  Chir.  120:  415,  1922. 
Wilhelmi,  R.  W. :  Serological  Reactions  and  Species  Specificity  in  Helminths, 

Biol.  Bullet.  79:  64,  1940.  Serological  Tests  for  Organismal  Differentials, 

Biol.  Bullet.  79:  64,  1940;  82:  179,  1942. 
Willheim,  R.  and  K.  Stern:  Serodiagnosis  of  Cancer,  Biochem.  Zeitschr.  226: 

315,  1930. 
Williamson,  C.  S. :  Length  of  Survival  of  Homobgenous  Kidney  Transplants 

in  Dogs,  J.  Urology  10 :  275,  1923. 
Winkler,  F.:  Transplantation  of  Pigmented  Skin  in  Amphibia,  Arch.  f.  Ent- 

wicklgsmech.  29 :  620,  1910. 
Witebsky,  Ernest,  N.   C.  Klendshog,  and  P.  Swanson:  Agglutinogens,  Ag- 
glutinins and  Blood  Transfusions,  J.A.M.A.  116:  2654,  1941. 
Witebsky,  E.  and  G.  Sollazzo:  Organspecific  Brain  Structures  in  Ontogenesis 

Z.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  67:1, 1930. 
Witebsky,  E.  and  K.  Komiya  :  Antibodies  Against  Leucocytes,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm. 

forsch.  67:480,  1930. 
Witebsky,   Ernst:    Serological   Analysis   of   Cells   and   Tissues,   Naturwissen- 

schaften   17:  771,   1929.   Serological  specificity  of  Carcinoma  Tissue,  Klin. 

Woch.  9:58,  1930. 
Witebsky,  E.  and  E.  Morelli:  Serological  Analysis  of  Sarcoma,  Zeitschr.  f. 

Imm.  forsch.  78 :  179,  1933. 
Witebsky,  E. :  Common  Antigens  in  Human  Blood  Group  A  Hogblood  and  in 

Forssman  Differentials,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  48:  369,  1926;  49:  1  and 

517,  1927;  51:  161,  1927. 
Witebsky,   E.   and   K.   Okabe:    Group   Antigens   in   Human   Organ   Extracts; 

Reactions  with  Isoagglutinins,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  52:  359,  1927;  54: 

131,  1927. 
Witebsky,  E.  and  J.  Steinfeld:  Organspecificity,  Zeitschr.  f.  Imm.  forsch.  58: 

271,  1928. 
Wodsedalek,  J.  E. :  Sterility  in  the  Mule,  Biol.  Bullet.  30:  1,  1910. 
Woglom,  Wm.  H. :  A  critique  of  Tumor  Resistance,  J.  Cancer  Res.  7:  283,  1922; 

Rapport  Congres  du  Cancer,  Paris  p.  118  Strassbourg  1923. 
Woglom,   Wm.   H. :   Absorption  of   Protective  Agents   from  Rats  Resistant  to 

Transplantable  Sarcoma,  Am.  J.  Cancer  17:  873,  1933. 
Woglom,  Wm.  H. :  Recovery  in  Locke's  Solution  of  a  Retarding  Agent  from 

Immune  Rats,  Am.  J.  Cancer  30 :  477,  1937. 
Woglom,  W.  H. :  Immunity  to  Transplantable  Tumors,  Cancer  Review  4:  129, 

1929. 
Wolfe,  H.  R. :  Application  of  Precipitin  Reaction  to  Studies  of  Relationship  in 

Mammals,  Birds  and  Reptiles,  Biol.  Bullet.  76:  108,  1939. 
Woodward,  A.  E. :  Physiological  Significance  of  Precipitates  from  Egg  Secre- 
tion of  Arbacia  and  Asterias,  J.  Exp.  Zool.  26:  459,  1918. 
Woods,  A.  C,  E.  L.  Burky,  and  M.  B.  Woodhall:  Organ  Specific  Properties 

and  Antigenic  Power  of  Alpha  Crystalline,  Transact.  Am.  Ophthalm.  Soc. 

29:  168,  1931. 
Wormall,  A. :  Immunological  Specificity  of  Halogenated  and  Nitrated  Protein, 

J.  Exp.  Med.  51 :  295,  1930. 
Wyckoff,  R.  W.  G. :  Ultracentrifugal  Purification  of  Macromolecular  Proteins, 

Science  86:  92,  1937. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY  695 

Wyman,  L.  C.  and  C.  Tum  Suden  :  Homoiotransplantation  of  Adrenal  Cortical 
Tissue,  Science  85 :  589,  1937. 

Y 

Yamakami,  K. :  Individuality  of  Semen;  Specific  Inhibition  of  Isohemagglutina- 
tion,  J.  Immunol.  12:  185,  1926. 

Z 

Zacherl,  H. :  Ovarian  Function  in  Parabiosis,  Krankheitsforschung  6:  174,  1928. 
Zangemeister,  W.  and  Eva  Krieger:  Serological  Reactions  Between  New-born 

Children  and  Parents,  Miinch.  Med.  Woch.  75:  1577,  1928. 
Zeller,  E.  A. :  Specificity  of  Diamino  Oxydase,  Naturwissenschaften.  26 :  578 

1938. 
Zozaya,  J.  and  Janet  Clark  :  Immunization  with  Polysaccharides  of  Pneumo- 

cocci,  J.  Exp.  Med.  57:  21,  1933. 
Zuckerman,  S.  :  The  Social  Life  of  Monkeys  and  Apes,  New  York,  1932. 


Author  and  Subject  Index 


Abderhalden,  22 
Addison,  24,  59,  123 
Adelmann,  265 
Adelsberger,  481,  491 
Adaptation,  various  types  of,  14 

—  in    unicellular    organisms    and    viruses, 

584-587,  588 

—  of  bacteria  and  formation  of  new  en- 

zymes, 572 

—  of    symbionts   in   insects   to   mycetoma 

and  to  species,  564 

—  in  tissues,  580-584,  588 

—  to  autogenous  toxins  and  to  microor- 

ganisms, 559,  562-563 
Adaptive    changes   in   host   against   trans- 
planted tumors,  397,  398 

tissues,  tumors  and  viruses,  605 

transplantation  of  normal  tissues, 

396,  397 

transplantation    of    tumors,    390- 

397,  436-437,  438 

Adaptive  variations,  364,  376,  377 
Adolph,  226 

Affinity,  vegetative  and   sexual,   19 
Ageing,  chemical  changes  in,  527-528 

—  and  evolution,  601 

Algae,  specific  adaptation  in,  293,  294 

Allantois,  transplantation  into,  177-178 

Alloway,  586 

Alverdes,  246 

Amoebocytes  and  tissue  formation,  298-301 

Amphibia  (adult),  transplantation  and  in- 
dividuality in,  226-231 

— ,  autogenous,  homoiogenous,  and  heter- 
ogenous transplantation  of  skin,  226- 
227,  of  other  organs,  229 

— ,  urodeles  and  anurans,  differences  be- 
tween, 231 

Anaphylaxis  and  transplantation,  158,  163- 
164 

—  immunization  and  organismal  differen- 

tials, 556-557,  558,  559 
Anderson,  229 
Andervont,  357,  358,  409 
Andrewes,  357,  430 
Annelids,  transplantation  and  individuality, 

218-223 
— ,  homoiogenous  transplantation,  218-219, 

221,  222 
— ,  autogenous  transplantation,  219 
— ,  tissue  and  organ  equilibria,  219-221,  222- 

223 
Annelids,      heterogenous     transplantation, 

221-223 
Anson,  539 


Anterior-chamber  of  eye,  transplantation 
into,  179-182 

, and  hormones,  179-180 

,  transplantation  of  tumors  in- 
to, 181 
Antibodies,  against  autogenous  tumors,  402 
— ,  multiple,    against    single    experimental 

antigens,  570 
— ,  production  of,  in  vitro,  578-579 
Antigens  and  antibodies  in  embryonal  and 
adult  tissues,  524-526 

—  and  autogenous  substances,  516-518 

—  in  blood   of   horse,   donkey   and   mule, 

519-521 

—  in  cancer  and  in  embryonal  tissue,  429- 

430 
— ,  carrier  and  hapten,  568-570,  574-575 

—  in  Cavia  hybrids,  521 
— ,  complex,  565 

—  of  erythrocytes,  changes  in,  586-587 
— ,  experimental ;    graded    specificity    of, 

568-569 

—  in  hybrids  of  Berberis,  523 

—  in  hybrids  of  doves,  521-523 

—  and  individuality  differentials,  23 

— ,  other  than  organismal  differentials  in 
transplantation  of  tumors,  402,  427, 
431 

—  and  organ  specific  substances,  23 

—  (complex),  and  species  differentials,  22, 

23 

—  in  tumors,  organismal  differentials,  377, 

378,  380-381 

Apolant,  340,  343,  343,  344,  345,  385,  400, 
401,  412,  425,  432,  434 

Appel,  T.  W.,  138,  181 

Appel,  Max,  412 

Armangue,  570 

Aronson,  551 

Arthropods,  transplantation  and  individu- 
ality in,  223-225 

Arthus  phenomenon  and  idiosyncrasy,  551- 
556 

Ascoli,  407,  511 

Askanazy,  254 

Astbury,  566 

Athrepsia,  and  immunity  against  trans- 
planted tumors,  159,  169,  401,  403,  432 

Atopen,  553 

Atwell,  180 

Avery,  504,  570,  586 

Autogenous  equilibrium,  14,  24,  141,  142, 
212,  286 

and  cancerous  growth,  142 

—  substances,  13 

—  tissue  regulators,  71 


697 


698 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


Autogenous  transplantation,  139 

in  birds,  59-63,  138 

in  mice,  54-55 

in  guinea  pigs  and  rats,  37-51 

of  thyroid  gland,  37-38,  136-137 

of  thyroid  gland,  effect  of   feeding 

thyroid  substance,  41 

of  skin,  136 

of  cartilage  and  fat  tissue,  41,  42, 

45 

of  ovary,   136 

of  striated  muscle  tissue,  45,  46 

of  uterus,  47-48 

of  uterus  and  development  of  pla- 

centoma,   49-50 

of  arteries,  167-168 

of  kidney,  50-53 

of  leg,  167-168 

of  thymus,  138-139 

of  tumors,  136 

reactions  in,  61,  62,  141-142 

B 

Bacteriophage,  specificity  of,  577 

Baeslack,  388,  408,  419 

Bailey,  572 

Balinsky,  246,  305 

de  Baloghi,  349 

Baltzer,  309 

Bancroft,  539 

Barnes,   382 

Barth,  450 

Bartz,  577 

Bashford,  24,  256,  340,  345,  363,  373,  389, 
391,  400,  401,  402,  411,  412,  424,  425, 
432,  434,  435,  436 

Baumgartner,  Leona,  527 

Bautzmann,  262 

Bayer,  145,  147,  179 

Beadle,  272 

Becht,  181 

Beebe,  414 

B  eh  ring,   22 

Begg,  355 

Belogolowy,  251 

Benign  tumors,  effect  of  hormones,  359, 
360,  361 

,  organismal  and  tissue  differentials, 

359-362 

,  transplantation  of,  359-362 

Bensley,  542,  579 

Berger,  535 

Bergmann,  566,  573 

Bernstein,  471,  493,  494 

Bert,  166 

Besredka,  470 

Biberstein,  557 

Biochemical  differences  between  individu- 
als, 23-24,  150-151,  169 

Bittner,  96,  138,  370,  371,  373,  389 

Blacher,  446,  447 


Black,  499 

Blakeslee,  563 

Bloch,  552 

Block,  572 

Blood  cell  reaction  and  age  of  donors 
of  transplants,  186 

induced  by  protein,  197,  198 

induced   by   heated   tissues,    195- 

196 

induced  by  tissues  treated  chemi- 
cally,  196-198 

Blood,  transfusion  of,  19 

Blood  groups,  agglutinogen,  agglutinins 
and  organismal  differentials,  time  of 
origin,  492-493 

,  antigen,  agglutinins  and  organismal 

differentials,  478,  479-486,  487-488, 
495-497 

,  and  constitution,  153,  497 

Blood  group  differentials  and  Forssman 
differential,  491-492 

Blood  groups  and  individuality  differen- 
tials, 22,  150-156 

,  mode  of  inheritance,  494- 

495 

Blood  groups,  secondary  and  unusual;  in- 
dividuality differentials,  485 

in  different  species  of  animals,  486- 

491 

and  racial  differences,  486 

Blood  vessel  anastomosis  and  transplanta- 
tion, 166-167,  167-169 

Blumenthal,  12,  13,  28,  61,  63,  65,  119,  122, 
151,  162,  164,  186,  196,  197,  344,  362, 
422,  423,  424,  439,  493,  524,  540 

Bodansky,  Oscar,  577 

Bodenstein,  449,  611 

Bordet,  22 

Born,  223,  234,  235,  236,  247,  451 

Borrel,  24,  343,  358 

Borst,  24,  157,  168,  169 

Boyd,  W.  C,  499 

Boyden,  499,  500,  501 

Brain,   transplantation  into,   178-179 

— ,  homoiogenous    transplants    in,    178-179 

Braus,  236,  246,  247,  524 

Brian,  305 

Bronfenbrenner,  577 

Browman,  138 

Brown,  A.  P.,  461,  519,  539,  572 

Browne,  E.  N.,  204,  205 

Bruck,  150,  502 

Buchbinder,  479,  487 

Buchner,  22 

Bullock,  407 

Burack,  358 

Burgess,  158,  417,  418,  424 

Burnet,  585 

Burns,  R.  K.,  247,  451 

Burt,  204,  205 

Bytinski-Salz,  266,  267,  269,  561,  583 


INDEX 


699 


C 

Campbell,  578 

Camus,  525 

Cancer,  nature  and  causes,  333-337 

Cannon,  P.,  528,  551,  581 

Cannon,  W.  B.,  463,  593 

Caritonoids,  as  species  and  strain  specific 
substances,  293 

Carlson,  181 

Carnot,  136 

Carrel,  167,  168,  185,  190 

Caspari,  407,  408,  411,  426,  433,  438 

Castle,  320 

Celakowsky,  294 

Cellular  reactions  of  host  against  trans- 
planted tissues,  6,  8,  24,  27-28 

and     active     immunity, 

159-160,  162-163 

;  their  specificity,  130- 

141 

tumors,     416-427 

Chambers,  H.,  386,  389,  433,  438 

Chambers,  L.  A.,  542 

Chameleon,  transplantation  of  skin  in,  227 

Chandler,  318 

Charipper,  180 

Chase,  556 

Cheever,  181,  182,  412 

Chemical   constitution  of   organismal   dif- 
ferential,   196-197,   272-273 

and  of  organ  differentials, 

465,  565-579 

organizers,   272-273 

hemocyanins,    572 

hemoglobin,  572-573 

myosin  and  myogen,  572-573 

Chemical  nature  of  antigens  and  anti- 
bodies, 573-574 

carrier,   its   specificity,   569-570 

experimental  antigen,  566-571 

differentials  in  idiosyncracy,  565 

individuality,    species   and   organ 

differentials,  565-566,  571-574,  578 

species  differentials  and  precipi- 

..  tinogens,  567 

and   specificity  of  enzymes,  575-576 

and  specificity  of  viruses,  577 

Child,  204,  215,  216,  450 

Chimaerae  in  coelenterates,  209-213 

Christiani,   136,   144,   145 

Cienkowski,  294 

Circuits  between  organisms  and  environ- 
ment, 650-656 

Claude,  542,  579 

Clemmensen,   357 

Cloudman,  370,  371,  383,  398,  416 

Clowes,  340,  388,  408,  411,  414 

Coca,  553 

Coelenterates,  heterogenous  transplanta- 
tion in,  212-213 


Coelenterates,  colony  formation  and  indi- 
viduality in,  213-214 

—  organismal  differentials  and  tissue  equi- 

libria, 204-214 

—  and  potential   immortality,  214 
Cole,  A.  G.,  545 

Cole,  W.  H.,  226 

Cole,  L.  J.,  522-523 

Collins,  226 

Colloidal  dyes  and  immunity  against 
tumors,  357-358 

Colony  formation  and  individuality  differ- 
ential-like substances,  296,  302 

Coman,  357 

Compensatory  hypertrophy  of  thyroid 
gland,   endocrine    function  in,    148-149 

Conklin,   19 

Concomitant  immunity  against  transplant- 
ed tumors,  403-408 

in  inbred   strains,  404 

Constitution,  25-26 

Constitution   and   mosaic   individuality,   26 
Contact  substances,  13 
Cooke,  552 
Cornman,  563 
Xorrens,   18,  20,  21,  316,  319,  460 
Corson- White,  387,  406 
Cox,  526 
Cragy,  146 
Craig,  387 

Cramer,  389,  432,  434,  435,  436 
Crampton,  223 

Criteria  of  compatibility  between  host  and 
tumor    or    normal    tissue-transplants, 
366-367,  377-380 
Crossen,  67 
Cuenot,  364,  367 


Da  Fano,  160,  419,  420 

Dakin,  504,  505,  545 

Dale,  504,  505,  535,  537,  545 

Danchakoff,  420 

Danforth,  59 

Davis,  Hallowell,  462 

Dawson,  A.  J.,  585,  586 

Defalco,  500,  535,  541 

Demerec,  321 

Demoll,  325 

Dervieux,  516 

Desflandres,   136 

Detwiler,  245,  248,  277,  280 

Dick  test,  526-527 

Dmochowsky,  394,  429,  431,  583 

Doerr,  535 

Doncaster,   310 

Driesch,  237,  240,  625 

Dubos,  577 

Duhey,  470 

Duke,  555,  557 


700 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


von  Dungern,  159,  488,  491,  511,  520 
Dunn,  490 

Duran-Reynals,  356,  391 
Diirken,  229,  250,  251,  559 


East,  316,  317,  319,  323,  324,  325 

Eaton,  84,  89 

Ebeling,  A.  H.,  190 

Ebeling,  420 

Echinoderms,  transplantation  and  individu- 
ality, 225 

Egocentric  and  objective  world,  634-637, 
642 

Ehrenpreis,  228 

Eh  rich,  426 

Ehrlich,  22,  23,  24,  151,  158,  159,  248,  340, 
358,  373,  374,  386,  390,  400,  401,  403, 
411,  412,  432,  434,  501,  510-511,  514, 
515,  517 

von  Eiselsberg,  339 

Eisen,  376,  381,  413 

Eisler,  487 

Ekman,  245,  246,  280 

El  son,  45 

Embryonal  tissues  and  eggs,  homoiogenous 
and  heterogenous  transplantation,  237- 
242 

amphibian,  autogenous,  homoioge- 
nous and  heterogenous  transplantation, 
234-237 

avian,     transplantation     into     adult 

birds,  252 

mammalian,      transplantation      into 

mammals,  253-256 

syngenesiotransplantation,    255 

transplantation     into     allantois     of 

chick,  253 

Embryonal  and  tumor  tissue,  comparison, 
433 

Emge,  358,  360 

Enderlen,  24,  168 

Engle,  147,  526 

Ephrussi,  272 

Equilibrium,  organismal  (autogenous,  spe- 
cies, class),  331-332,  471,  475-476 

—  between  blastomeres,  282-283 
Erdmann,  Rhoda,  187,  229,  397,  581-583 
Ermatinger,  120 

Euler,  577 

Evolution  of  disease  and  death,  601-604 

—  and  genetic  constitution,  597-600 

—  of   individuality,  649-658 

and  change  in  relations  between 

organism    and    environment,    649 

and  of  nervous  system,  605-606, 

657-658 

and  of  civilization,  606-607 

Eysh,  317 


Famulener,   526-527 
Faur£-Fremiet,  301,  303 
Fere,  252 

Ferguson,  L.  C,   151 

Fertilization,    autogenous    and    transplan- 
tation, 315-321 

—  and  organismal  differentials,  307-314 

—  and   transplantation,   307-308,   311,  312. 

313-314 
Fibiger,  346 
Fichera,   159,  255 
Fick,  19,  20,  21 
Filatov,  244,  245 
Finkler,  224,  225 
Firket,  339 
Fischer,  Heinrich,  159 
Fischer,  488 

Fischer,  A.,   187,  205,  353,  397,  583 
Fitzgerald,  502 
Fleisher,   M.   S.,   161,  343,  344,  364,   366, 

368,  370,  389,  395,  400,  403,  406,  407, 

408,  534,  540,  542,  563 
Foreign  bodies,   cellular   reaction  against 

198-199 
Forssman,  479 
Forssman     (heterogenetic,     heterophilic), 

antigen    and    organismal    differential, 

478-482,  487 
Foster,  59 
Forster,    557 
Foulds,  407 
Freeman,  N.  E.,  471 

Free  will,  intention  and  responsibility   637 
Frei,  557 

Freund,   Paula,  255 
Freund,   E.,  429 
Freund,  J.,  527 
Friedberger,  526,  551 
Friedenreich,  490,  587 
Friedenthal,  22,  498 
Frohlich,  557 
Fuchs,  429 
Fujinami,  355 
Furth,  357,  374,  381,  382,  391,  392,  4^.  H§$ 


Galtsoff,  302,  303 
Gardner,  W.  U.,  361 
Garner,  470 
Gassul,  397,  581-582 
Gay,  591 

Gaylord,  340,  411,  414 
Gebhardt,  215,  217 
Gegenbaur,  20 

Gene-hormones   and   organismal    differen- 
tials, 272 
Genetic  constitution  and  antigens,  151-152 


INDEX 


701 


Genetic    constitution   and    individuality,   8, 

9,  10,  21,  22,  108,  134,  150-153,  175-176, 

292,  293 
of  normal  tissues  and  tumors,  373- 

374,  376,  378-379,  382 
and  organismal  differentials,  24,  74, 

596-597 
and    organ    differentials,    464, 

596 
Genetic  factors  in  fertilization,  315-318,  319, 

320-321 

in  behavior,  616-618 

Genther,  187 

Gey,  357 

Gheorgiu,  391,  392,  421 

Giani,  167,  168 

Giard,  275,  276 

Gley,  525 

Godlewski,  278 

Goebel,  504,  570 

Goetsch,  204,  209,  210,  215,  216,  217,  249 

Gohrbandt,   175 

Goldfarb,  237,  240 

Goldschmidt,  453-454 

Goldsmith,  205,  214 

Gonzalez,  570 

Goodale,  60,  84,  136 

Goodman,   180 

Gorer,  378,  410 

Gortner,  503-504,  536 

Goto,  172 

Grades  of  reaction,  34-35 

Graefenberg,  528 

Graeper,  246,  277,  281 

Graves,  W.  Wm.  459 

Grave,  C.,  473 

Grauer,  358 

Gray,  310 

Greene,  H.  S.  N.,  181,  182,  357,  392,  411, 

412,  421,  425 
Greer,  181 
Gross,  L.,  220,  440 
Growth   energy,   experimental   changes   in 

transplanted  tumors,  385-390,  391,  395- 

396 
,  its      stimulation      in      transplanted 

tumors,  388-389 
Growth    momentum    and   transplantability 

of  tumors,  375-376 
Growth   rhythms  in  tumors,  370 
Gruber,  22 
Griinbaum,  22,  498 
Guerin,  358 
Guerriero,  147 
Gussio,  353 
Guthrie,  167,  484 
Guyenot,  449 
Guyer,  517,  541,  555 
Gye,  355 

H 
Haaland,  343,  364,  403,  432,  435,  436,  437 


de  Haan,  237,  238,  240 

Haberer,  146 

Haddow,  154 

Hadley,  226 

Hadorn,  449,  611 

Haendel,  344,  408 

Halban,  569 

Halber,  428,  489 

Hallauer,  587 

Halsted,  136,  146 

Hamburger,  22,  23,  510 

Hammond,  253 

Hanau,  339 

Hanes,   187,  353,  414,  415 

Hapten  and  carrier,  504,  568-569 

Hapten,  inhibiting  effect  of,  569,  574 

Harde,   178,  421 

Harmes,  218,  227,  229 

Harris,  T.  N.,  426 

Harrison,   R.   G,  236,  237,  246,  247,  277, 

278,  279,  280 
Hartley,  535,  537 
Harvey,  G.   N.,  474 
Harvey,  E.  Browne,  309 
Haterius,  180 
Haurowitz,  578 
Heat,  effect  on  transplants,  69-70,  118-119, 

195-196 
heterotransplants,    118-119,     195- 

196 
Heart  embryonal,  union  of  parts  of  and 

organismal  differentials,  295 
Heidelberger,  538,  565,  572,  575 
Heiman,  358,  360 
Helff,  282 
Hektoen,  181,  488,  499,  535,  537,  540,  543, 

545,  546,  547,  548 
Hellmich,  245,  249,  282,  305 
Hemocyanins,  15 
Hemoglobins,  15,  18 
Hemolysins  and  hemagglutinins  for  homoi- 

ogenous  erythrocytes,  151-152,  510-511 
Henle,    542 
Henshaw,  517,  555 
Herbst,  20,  240 
Heredity   and   transplantation  of   tumors, 

363-383 
Hermannsdorfer,  174 
Herriot,  576,  577 
Hertwig,  O.,  18,  19,  307,  364 
Hesselberg,  Cora,  24,  39,  47,  124,  160,  425. 
Heteroagglutinin      and      heterohemolysin, 

482-483 
Heterogenous  transplantation,  7,  8,  116-130 
and  autogenous  transplantation,  208, 

209,  210,  211 

and  bacteria,  117-121 

in  birds,  59 

of  blood  clots,  121-122 

between  rat  and  mouse,  126-127 


702 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


between     Peromyscus    and     mouse, 

127-128 

Heterogenous  transplantation  and  blood 
cell  reaction,  162-163 

of  arteries,  167-168 

of  cartilage,  125-126 

of  kidney  tissue,  125 

of  guinea  pig  skin,   123-124 

of  pigeon   skin,   124 

of   thyroid  gland,    124-125,    136 

of  testicle,  138 

of  tumors,  391-392,  393-394 

of  cancer,  adaptive  changes  in,  350, 

351 

of  chicken  sarcoma,  355-356 

of  tumors  into  chorio-allantoic  mem- 
brane, yolk  sac  of  chick  embryo,  brain 
or  anterior  chamber  of  eye,  356,  357 

;  growth  in  radiated  animals,  357 

Heterosis,  323-325 

Heterotoxins,  8,   12,   13,   122 

—  primary      and      secondary      reactions 

against,  161-162 

—  and  blood  cell  reaction,  119-120,  162-163 

—  and  growth  processes,  129 

—  and  lymphocytes,  117-120 

—  and  polymorphonuclear  leucocytes,  118- 

123 

Heyde,  166 

Hicks,  499-500 

Higashi,  538 

Higgins,  146,  180 

Hiraiwa,  253 

Hirszfeld,  427,  428,  429,  486,  488,  489,  491, 
511,  520,  526,  527 

His,  19 

Hitchcock,  187,  188,  230 

Hoadley,  253 

Hoepfner,  167 

Hofferber,  488 

Hoffman,  503-504 

Holman,   154 

Holtfreter,  262 

Homoiogenous  transplantation,  6,  7 

Homoiogenous  transplantation,  effect  of 
age,  40,  41,  66,  67,  137 

three  phases  following,  66,  67 

mechanism  of,  66-70 

differences   in   intensity  of   reaction 

in  different  hosts,  67-69 

reaction  against  living  and  dead  tis- 
sue, 69-70 

and  immunity,  158,  159,  169 

and  blood  cell  reaction,  162,  163 

attempts  to  improve  results,  163,  164 

and  autogenous  transplantation,  208, 

210-211 

in  guinea  pig  and  rat,  38-47 

in    mice,    55-58 

in  rabbits.  139 


in  birds,  59-63 

of  arteries,    167-169 

of  blood  clots,  121-122 

Homoiogenous  transplantation  of  cartilage, 

bone  and  fat  tissue,  42-45 

of  leg,  167 

of  kidney  tissue,  50-53 

of  ovary,   136 

of  parathyroid,  136 

of  skin,  136 

of  striated  muscle  tissue,  46,  47 

of  thyroid,  38-41,  136-137 

;  effect     of     feeding     thyroid 

substance,  41 

of  tumors,  340-347 

of  uterus,  47-49 

;  development   of    placentoma, 

49-50 
Homoiotoxin,  8,  12,  122,  170 

—  and  lymphocytes,  117-119 

—  primary  and  secondary,   160-161 
Hormones,   specificity  of  577-578 
Hormones  and  transplantations,  49-50,  109- 

111 

in  amphibia,  228-229 

into    anterior    chamber    of    eye, 

182,   183 
Hooker,  499 
Horowitz,  229 
Huck,  484 
Huggins,  531 
Hunt,  270 
Huppert,  18 
Huxley,  Julian,  220 
Hybridization,  19 

—  and  transplantation,  24 

in  inbred  guinea  pigs,  91-94 

in  inbred  rats,  84-88 

in  inbred  mice,  98-115 

Hydra,  204,  205 

Hypersensitiveness,  and  heredity,  553,  555, 

556,  558 

— ,  lack  of  in  transplanted  uterus  and  re- 
actions against  homoiogenous  differen- 
tials,   555 

— ,  hapten  and  carrier,  556,  557 


Idiosyncrasy,  organ  and  organismal  differ- 
entials,  557-558 
— ,  and  mosaic  individuality,  558 

—  against  autogenous  substances,  555 

—  and  anaphylaxis,  551,  553-554,  556 
— ,  passive  transfer  of,  553-554,  555 
Immortality,  potential  of  tissues,   190-194, 

433 

Immunity  active,  against  transplanted  em- 
bryonal  tissues,   255-256 

, tumors,  401,  402 


INDEX 


703 


—  and   organismal   differentials   in   tumor 

transplantation,  400-432 

—  active,  against  tumors  and  organismal 

differentials,    345-347,   412-413 
Immunity  against  transplanted  tumors  fol- 
lowing regression  of  a  tumor,  408-412 

—  active,  against  transplanted  tumors  pro- 

duced   by    inoculated    normal    tissues, 
412-413  ' 

—  against  heterogenous  chicken  sarcoma, 

355-356 

—  active,  against  transplanted  tumors  and 

weakening  of  growth  energy,  406-407 
Immunization  against  heterogenous  cancer, 
348-349,  350-352,  354-355 

—  active,  of  tumor  cells,  395 

Immune  substances  against  transplanted 
tumors,  414-415 

,  homoiogenous    against    spleen    and 

lens,  547 

Immune  reactions  and  organismal  differ- 
entials, 5-6,  25 

against  altered  species  differentials, 

567-569,  570-571 

Inbreeding,   321-325 

—  and    individuality   differentials,  24,   60- 

61,  83-115,  365 
— ,  effects  in  different  strains  of  mice,  100- 

101,  109-111 
— ,  effects  of  mutation,  88 

—  and    intensity   of    tissue   reactions,   8-9, 

60-61 

—  in  rats,  84-88 

—  in  guinea  pigs,  89-97 

—  in  mice,  98-115 

Inbred  strains,   tumor  transplantations  in, 

363-371 
Inner  and  outer  world,  627-630,  634-635 
Individuality,  definition,  3 
— ,  history  of  concept,  17-18 
— ,  mosaic,  4,  5,  14-15,  21,  25 

—  essential,    14-15,   24-25 

— ,  differentials,  5-7,  10,  140-141,  150-151, 
169-170,  175-176 

— ,  and  the  organism  as  a  harmonious  sys- 
tem, 15 

— ,  mosaic,  its  phylogenetic  development, 
593 

— ,  in  the  psychical-social  sense,  17 

— ,  its  symbolic  representation,   16 

—  as  a  system  of  specificities,  595-596 

—  and  potential  immortality,  600-601 

— ,  psychical-social,  its  physiological  basis, 

609-626 
— ,  mechanisms    of    integration    and    their 

evolution,  609-612 

—  and  lymphocytes,  connective  tissue  and 

blood  vessels,  6 

—  and  immunity,  15,  23,  24,  139 

—  and  allergy,  15 


—  or  organs  and  tissues,  457-465 

—  of   tumors  and  environmental   factors, 

435-436 
Individuality,  structural  and  psychical,  their 
evolution,  623-624 

—  and  world,  627-648 

— ,  bodily    and    psychical,    its    integration, 
624-626 

—  and  mechanism,  630-631,  633-634,  642- 

643 
— ,  world   and   science,   647-648 

—  psychical,  its  uniqueness,  644-645 

—  and  the  social  and  natural  struggle,  641- 

642,  646 
— ,  contrast  between   "I"   and   the   others, 
620-621 

—  and  consciousness,  620-621 

—  and  free  will,  621,  623-624,  627-634,  637, 

642-643 

—  psychical  and  environment,  623 

—  psychical  and  predictability  of  actions, 

623-624 

—  and  its  psychical  needs,  642-647 

—  and  psychical  goods,  639,  641 

—  and  morale,  641 

— ,  ethics  and  law,  641-642 

—  continuity  and  consistency,  643-645 

—  and    self-justification,   646-647 

— ,  psychical,  its  permanence,  645-646 

—  among  primitive  people  and  in  civilized 

society,  646-647 

—  and  groups,  646-647 

—  and  the  problems  of  philosophy,  647-648 
Individual  differences  in  behavior  of  ani- 
mals, their  evolution,  612-619,  621 

as  to  relative  importance  of  analytic 

thought  and  suggestion,  633-634 

in  strength  of  reactions  against  in- 
dividuality differentials,  29,  161 

,  demonstration  by  serological  meth- 
ods, 510-518 

and  hemagglutinins,  513-514 

and  blood   group   differentials,   514- 

515 

,  comparison   of   transplantation   and 

serological  tests,  514-516 

and  heterogenous  production  of  pre- 
cipitins, 516 

,  attempts  to  change  their  nature,  165 

Individuality  differentials,  local  actions, 
67-69 

,  functions  of,  15,  593 

and   serological  tests,   518 

,  actions  against,  72-73 

Ingbrigtsen,  154 

Ingle,   146,   180 

Insects,  social,  613 

Instincts  and  bodily  structures,  parallelism 
in  evolution,  622 

— ,  behavior  and  organ  differentials,  622 


704 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


Interplantation    and    organismal    differen- 
tials, 251 
Interracial    transplantation,    131-135 

in  birds,  59-60 

Irving,  461 

Irwin,  151,  172,  175,  521-523,  599 

Ishii,  411,  421 

Issayew,  204,  209,  213 

Ito,  348 


Krebs,  357 

Krehbiehl,  358 

Kritschewski,  427,  481,  492,  525 

Kross,  353 

Krusius,  540 

Kiihn,  18,  21,  272 

Kunitz,  474,  575-576 

Kurz,  328 

Kusche,  250,  251,  559 


Jacobs,  M.  H.,  495 

Jacobson,   146 

Jaeger,  Gustav,  20,  460 

Jaffe,  H.  L.,  138 

Janda,  251 

Janota,   181 

Jennings,  291 

Jensen,  C.  O.,  24,  339,  340,  363,  385,  400, 

401,  404,  432,  435 
Jensen,  P.,  287,  288,  296 
Joest,  218 
Johannsen,  20 

Johannsen's   pure  lines,  316,  364,  367 
Johnson,  B.  W.,  96 
Johnson,  H.  H.,  560 
Jollos,  377 
Jolly,  228 
Jones,  323,  325 
Jores,   159 
Jost,  316 

Jungeblut,  526,  585 
Just,  473 

K 

Kaempffer,  488 

Kalmanson,   577 

Kaminer,  429 

Karshner,  490 

Kellars,   173 

Kelley,   141 

Kendall,  E.  C,  146 

Kendall,  F.  A.,  575 

Kerwin,  47 

Keysser,  170 

Kidd,  430 

Kimura,  397,  583 

King,  H.  D.,  73,  83,  84,  131,  184,  204,  209, 

219,  225,  324,  597-598 
Kirk,  576 
Kirschbaum,  382 
Klinckhard,  488 
Klopstock,  506,  556,  569-570 
Knauer,  23,  136 
Kodama,  544,  591 
Koller,  611 
Kopec,  224,  225,  611 
Koppanyi,  228 
Kornfeld,   451 
Korschelt,  218,  220,  221 
Kossel,  527,  590-591 
Kozelka,  60,  138,  152,  154,  184 
Kraus,  22 


Lambert,    172,    187,   353,   414,   415 

Lancefield,   D.  E.,  311 

Lancefield,  R.  C,  505 

Landsteiner,  22,  23,  150,  152,  478,  481,  483, 

485-487,  488,  490,  493,  494,  499,  502,  504, 

505,  506,  507,  514,  520-521,  525,  538,  548, 

553,  556,  567-571,  572,  573-574,  598-599. 
Lattes,  516 
Lauer,   170 

van  Leeuwen,  Storm,  557 
Lehmann,  F.  E.,  271 
Lehmann,  W.,  159,  164 
Lehmann-Facius,   H.,   427,   428,   429,   506, 

541 
Lens,  of  eye  and  individuality  differentials, 

12 
Leopold,  342,  358 
Letterer,  517 

Leukemia,  transmission  of,  361-362 
Levene,    P.    A.,   571 
Levin,   I.,  368,   425 
Levine,  M.,  495 
Levine,   P.,    171,  481,  487,  488,   491,   492, 

499,  502,  507,  514 
Lewin,  C,  351,  364,  414,  433,  438 
Lewis,  J.  H.,  503,  505,  535 
Lewis,  M.  R,  392,  419,  555 
Lewis,  P.  A.,  556 
Lewis,  W.  H.,  244,  267 
Leypoldt,  218,  222 
Lexer,  154,  167,  168,  169,  170 
Lieure,  228 
Lignac,  357,  395,  426 
Des  Ligneris,  355 
Lillie,  F.  R.,  454,  472-473 
Lindemann,  451,  452 
Linkage   between   susceptibility  and   other 

factors   in  transplantation  of   tumors, 

371 
Lipschiitz,  147 
Little,  C.  C,  24,  84,  96,  138,  369,  370,  371, 

373,  378,  434,  438,  439,  473,  499-500 
Little,  R.  B,  528 
Local   reaction  and  blood  cell  reaction  in 

transplantation,  comparison  of,  65 
Lockemann,  528 
Loeb,  Jacques,  21,  204,  205,  237,  309,  312, 

473,  519,  566,  612 
Loehner,  324 
Long,  365 
Loncope,  557 


INDEX 


705 


Lubarsch,   157 

Lucke,  470 

Ludford,  357 

Lumsden,  346,  347,  354,  355,  378,  394,  407, 
410,  414,  415,  429,  433,  436,  437,  583 

Lurie,  556 

Lux,  146 

Lymphocytes,  destructive  action  of,  62-63 

— ,  in  immunity  against  transplanted  tu- 
mors,  401,   416-426 

— ,  and  organismal  differentials,  24 

— ,  in  various  types  of  transplantation,  79- 
80 

— ,  specific  attraction  by  different  tissues, 
114-115 

M 

Mach,  Ernst,  629 

McCutcheon,  981 

MacDowell,  382,  394,  413,  431,  583 

McPhee,  84,  89 

Macrea,  354 

Maisin,  357,  358 

Mangold,  246,  262,  264,  265,  266,  267,  269, 

272,  279,  287 
Manley,  139 

Mann,  F.  C,  146,  343,  358,  359 
Mann,  L.  S.,  429,  542 
Marchand,    157 
Marine,   139 
Mark,  567 
Markee,  180 
Marks,  345 
Marsh,  84 

Marshall,  501,  502,  506 
Martins,  173,  180 
Masse,  357,  358 
Mathey,  228 
Mat  son,  486 
Matsuyama,  173 
Maus,  387 

May,  R.  M.,  60,  180,  227 
Mayeda,   175,    176 
Mayngord,  358 

Mechanistic  basis  of  behavior,   its  evolu- 
tion, 612-619,  620,  625 
Meisenheimer,  224 
Mendel,  18 

Mendelian  heredity  in  tumor  transplanta- 
tion,  367-373 
Mendlovitsch,  492,  525 
Mercier,  364,   367 
Metchnickoff,  22 
Meyer,  566 
Meyns,  227,  228 
Mez,  500-501 
Michaelis,  363,  388 
Miller  (with  Fibiger),  346 
Miller  (with  Rhoads),  413 
Miller,  C.  P.,  491,  502,  514,  599 
Milojevich,  279,  280,  453 
Mirsky,  566 


Moenkhaus,  312 

Moevus,  291,  292,  293,  294 

Montalenti,  312,  313 

Moore,  A.  R.,  610,  612 

Moore,  C.  R.,  147 

Moore,  R.  A.,   180 

Morato,  570 

Morau,  339,  363 

Morelli,  428 

Moretti,  215 

Morgan,  H.  R.,  181,  182,  412 

Morgan,   L.  V.,  204,  216,  220 

Morgan,  T.  H.,  204,  237,  240,  277,  320 

Morgenroth,  23,  151,  510-511,  514,  515,  517 

Moritz,  523 

Morpurgo,   171,   172,   173,  364 

Morphogenic  substances  and  recipient  tis- 
sues, organismal  differentials  and  rela- 
tive specificity  of,  443-456 

Mosaic  structure  of  organs  and  mosaic 
individuality,  457-459,  461-463 

Mottram,  353,  410,  418,  425,  430 

Mudd,  470 

Multiple  factors  in  transplantation  of 
tumors,  356,  357,  388 

Murphy,  J.  B,  24,  160,  163,  177,  178,  346, 
391,  412,  414,  418,  419,  420,  422,  425, 
434 

Murray,  P.   S.  F.,  253 

Murray,  J.  A.,  340,  363,  389,  391,  400,  432, 
434,  435,  436 

Murray,  J.  M.,  369 

Mutations  and  transplantability  of  tumors 
439 

Mutscheller,  218,  220 

Mutz,  204,  210 

Myers,  24,  125 

Myxomycetae,  specific  adaptation  of,  293- 
294 

N 

Naegeli,   C.  v.   17,   19 

Naegeli,  O.,  554 

Nathan,   553 

Natural     immunity     against     transplanted 

tumors,  401-403 
Needham,  262,   263 
Neilson,  254 
Neumann,   146 
Nicholas,  255 
Nilson,  146 
Noble,  617 

Northrop,  J.  H.,  474,  575-577 
Number  and  nature  of  susceptibility  fac- 
tors  in   transplantation  of   tumors,   369- 
371,  378-379 
Nussman,  246 
Nuttall  22,  498,  499 


Oberling,  358 

Obermayer,  23,  540,  548,  553,  566-568,  569 


706 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


Objective  and  subjective  aims  in  social 
actions,   640-641 

O'Brien,  557 

von  Oettingen,  492 

Ohki,  543 

Olitzky,  526 

Oliver,  430 

Oilier,  18,  23,  184 

Opie,  551,  557 

Orcutt,  528 

Organ  differentials,  5,  7 

as   antigens,    13 

autogenous,  homoiogenous,  heterog- 
enous as  antigens,  546-547 

Organ  and  organismal  differentials,  chem- 
ical nature  of,  547-549,  565-579 

,  evolution  of,  273-274,  589-607 

Organ  blood  group-and  Forssman  differ- 
entials and  secondary  organismal  dif- 
ferentials, phylogenetic  relationship  of, 
594-596 

Organ  differentials  during  embryonal  de- 
velopment, 545-546 

Organ  and  tissue  differentials,  their  an- 
alysis by  serological  methods,  530-549 

Organ  differentials,  serological  criteria, 
532-534 

Organ- (substance-)  and  organismal  dif- 
ferentials (as  tested  by  serological 
methods)  of  adrenal  gland  (medulla), 
541 

and  organismal  differentials  of  brain, 

535,  541-542,  546-547 

and  organismal  differentials  of  car- 
cinoma, 542-543 

and  organismal  differentials  of  case- 
in, 537 

and  organismal  differentials  of  egg 

albumin,  537,  545 

and  organismal  differentials  of  egg 

yolk,  544-545 

and  organismal  differentials  of  epi- 
physis, 541-542 

and  organismal  differentials  of  fib- 
rinogen, 547 

—  and  organismal  differentials  of  globin, 
538 

—  and  organismal  differentials  of  hemo- 

globin,  537-539 

and  organismal  differentials  of  kid- 
ney, 534,  542 

and  organismal  differentials  of  lens, 

530,  535,  540-541,  546,  547 

and  organismal  differentials  of  leu- 
cocytes, 540 

and  organismal  differentials  of  liver, 

542 

and  organismal  differentials  of  mi- 
tochondria, 542 

and      organismal      differentials      of 

mouse  organs,  542 


Organ-  (substance-)  organismal  differen- 
tials of  proteins  of  blood  serum,  535, 
537 

and  organismal  differentials  of  skin, 

547 

and      organismal      differentials      of 

spermatozoa,  543-544 

and  organismal  differentials  of  thy- 
reoglobulin,  539,   547 

Ontogenetic  development,  organ  and  tissue 
equilibrium  and  organismal  differen- 
tials, 242-243 

Organ  or  tissue  specificity,  444-446,  447-456 

Organizers,  205-207,  215,  239 

Organizers,  tissue  differentiation  and  or- 
ganismal differentials,  256-258,  259-274 

Organismal  differentials,  5,  10 

,  primary  and  secondary,  11,  17,  295- 

296,  321,  464-465,  545,  548,  549,   593- 
595 

and  organismal  specificity,  443,  446- 

447,  447-456 

and   specific  adaptation,  443 

Organismal  tissue  equilibrium,  463-464 

Organisms  as  systems  of  specificities,  595- 
596 

Organismal  differentials  and  non-living 
substances,  reactions  against,  64-65, 
199,  202 

and    the    reactions    against    strange 

differentials,  589-590 

of   hybrids   between   nearly    related 

species,  519-523 

and   reaction   of   blood   cells,    12-13, 

61,  63-65 

and  hormones,  13,  143-149,  271,  273- 

274 

and    unicellular    organisms,    295-297 

and  formation  of  Plasmodia  or  colo- 
nies, 204,  213 

in  coelenterates,  211-213 

in  invertebrates,  225 

and  growth  substances  in  transplan- 
tation in  amphibian  embryos,  247-249 

in  embryonal  tissues,  64 

and  organizers,  268-274 

and  plasticity  of  organs,  231,  286 

and  tissue  differentials,  evolution  of 

286,   589-607 

Organismal  differentials,  evolution  in 
plants,   590 

,  during  phylogenetic,  embryonal  de- 
velopment and  during  regeneration, 
591-593 

,  in    transplantation    of    tumors,    15, 

361-381 

,  growth  energy  and  adaptive  pro- 
cesses in  transplantation  of  tumors, 
384-399 

,  and  susceptibility  factors  in  trans- 
plantation of  tumors,  439 


INDEX 


707 


Organismal  differentials,  as  antigens  in  im- 
munity against  transplanted  tumors, 
402 

,  and  organ  differentials  as  antigens, 

13,  477 

Osborne,    502-503,    505,    536 

Oscillating  growth  of  transplanted  tumors, 
386-388 

Ottenberg,  484 

Ottensooser,  538 


Pagel,   555 

Panimmunity  and  organismal  differentials, 

411 
Parabiosis,  5,  166-167,  171-176 

—  and   individuality   differentials,    171-176 

—  union  of  nerves,  171 

— ,  harmonious  phases  in,   173 

— ,  disharmonious  phases  in,  173-176 

—  and  blood  group  antigens,   171 
Parasite    (symbiont)    and  host,   specificity 

of  relation,  603-605 

Parasitism  (symbiosis)  as  parabiotic 
state,  167,  176 

Parker,  G.  H.,  611 

Parker,  R.  C,  446,  462 

Parker,  R.  R,  120 

Parsons,  348 

Pasteur,  22 

Pauling,  566,  578 

Pavlow,  612 

Peebles,  204,  209 

Pennington,  D.,   178,  357 

Perkins,  611 

Perlzweig,  557 

Personality,  1,  2,  641 

— ,  inner  psychical  goods  and  health,  639- 
640,  641 

Perthes,  138 

Pertzoff,  303 

Petit,  343,  358 

Pfeiffer,  137,  147,  179,  184 

Pfliiger,  20 

Phelps,  354,  410 

Phisalix,  563 

Picco,  358 

Pick,  23,  540,  548,  553,  566-568,  569 

Piepho,  440,  450 

Pierce,   141 

Planarians,  transplantation  and  individual- 
ity in,  214-217 

— ,  homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  dif- 
ferentials, 217 

— ,  tissue  equilibrium  in,  214-217 

Plasma,   individual,   20 

Plasmodium  formation  in  myxomycetae, 
294-295 

Plasticity  of  behavior,  618-620,  622-623, 
625 

Phylogenetic  evolution  of  organismal  and 
tissue  differentials,  231-233 


Phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  development 
of  organismal  and  organ  differentials, 
256-257 

Poetry  and  art,  their  meaning,  634-636 

Poll,   327,  364,   459 

Polysaccharides  as  antigens,  574-575 

Prausnitz-Kiistner  reaction,   554,   555,   557 

Precipitins  and  species  relationships,  22 

Precursors  of  individuality  (organismal) 
differentials,  9,  21,  22 

Pregnancy  as  a  parabiotic  state,   167,   176 

—  of  host,  its  effect  on  transplants,  255 

Pressman,  578 

Pretresco,   173 

Price,  147 

Przibram,   225 

Protein,  specificity  of,   19,  22-23 

,  evolution  of,  590-592 

Proteinases  and  protein  synthesis,  573 

Protozoa,   union   of   free  living,  287-291 

Protozoan  protoplasm  and  organismal  or 
tissue  differentials,  287-293 

Prowazek,  294 

Pseudopods,  reactions  against  autogenous, 
homoiogenous  and  heterogenous  pro- 
toplasm,  287-289 

Psychical    goods,    638 

,  simple,  638,  639-640 

,  individual    distinctive,    638-639 

,  distinctive  class,  their  injurious  ef- 
fects, 638-639 

,  inner,  639-640 

Purdy,  350,  355 

Pure  lines,  20 

Putnoky,  349,  350,  392,  393-394 


Queen,  120 

de  Quervain,  554 


Rabes,  218 

Rabinovitch,  507 

Rabl,  18,  19 

Race  differences,  458-460 

Rand,  141,  204,  214,  215 

Reactions,  all  or  nothing,  138 

— ,  graded,  60 

— ,  variations   in   strength   against   strange 

individuality    differentials    in    different 

strains  and  individuals,  67-69 
—  against  primary  and  secondary  homoio- 

and  heterotoxins,  163 
Reciprocal  fertilization  and  transplantation, 

311-312 
Recovery    from    injuries    in    transplanted 

tumors,  386-387 
Reflexes,  conditioned,  612-613 
Regeneration  and  organismal  differentials, 

250,  257-258 
Regeneration  and  transplantation,  275-286 
Reichert,  461,  539,  572 


708 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


Reinhard,  393 

Resistance,  difference  between  embryos 
and  adult  organisms,  524-529 

— ,  increase  in  and  physiological  matura- 
tion, 526-527 

Retrogression-immunity  against  transplant- 
ed tumors  in  relation  to  organismal 
differentials,   411-412 

Reverdin,    18 

Reynolds,  288,  289,  290,  584,  586 

Reynaud,   147 

Rhoads,  413 

Ribbert,  24,  136,  159,  343,  358,  359 

Rich,  555 

Richter,  M.  N.,  138 

Ries,  224,  303 

Ritter,  446-448 

Rivers,  532 

Robbins,  324,  576 

Robertson,  O.  H.,  430,  526 

Robertson,  T.  B.,  591 

Robinson,   G.   H.,  358 

Roessle,  524 

Roffo,  364,  391 

Rohdenburg,  407 

Rollett,  18 

Romanes,  610 

Roskin,  426 

Rous,  24,  159,  177,  253,  254,  255,  256,  353, 
355,  358,  365,  388,  391,  412,  414,  415, 
418,  425,  430,  433 

Roux,  22 

Roux,  W.,  295 

Rubinstein,  427 

Russ,  386,  389,  410,  418,  425, 

Russell,  158,  256,  344,  401,  404,  407,  418, 
424,  425,  432,  434 

Rutloff,  218 

Ruud,  453 

Rywosch,  525 


Sabin,  A.  B.,  526 

Sachs,  Julius,  20 

Sachs,  H.,  491,  525 

Sale,  136 

Salter,   287 

Salzer,  146 

Sampson,  472 

Sanders,  585 

Sandstrom,   154,   155,  253 

Santos,  204,  215,  216,  217,  219 

Saphir,   181,  412 

Sarafran,  578 

Sauerbruch,    166 

Saxton,  141,   181,  357,  421,  448 

Scents  and  individuality,  459-461 

Schaxel,  246,  250,  277,  278,  280,  281 

Schecter,  471 

van  der  Scheer,  499,  520-521 

Schenk,  527 

Schermer,  488 


Schwerin,    578 

Schick  test,  526,  527 

Schiff,  481,  483,  491,  492,  494,  525 

Schmeckebier,  141 

Schmitt,  617 

Schoene,  23,  24,  74,  157,  158,  159,  176,  184, 
218,  326,  330,  345,  403,  412,  434 

Schotte,  250,  261,  266,  267,  270,  449 

Schrader,  487 

Schulhof,  535,  540,  543,  546,  547 

Schultz,  E.,  291 

Schultz,  W.  H,  551 

Schultz,  W.,  19,  24,  59,  229,  307,  326,  327, 
328,  329,  330,  453,  519 

Schultze,  Max,  287 

Schwarz,  407,  408 

Schwarzmann,  481 

Schweizer,  180 

Schwentker,  532 

Schwind,  247 

Sclerosis  of  thyroid  gland  of  mice  and 
transplantation,  102-103,  105-106 

Scott,  386,  389,  433,  438 

Seastone,  576 

Seelig,  407 

Seidel,  269 

Selection  in  strains  of  mice  as  cause  of 
hereditary  changes,  364,  373 

Selection  of  tumor  strains  in  serial  trans- 
plantation of  tumors,  390-391 

Self  consciousness,  639-640 

Self-fertilization  in  higher  plants,  315-320 

Ciona,  320-321 

Sellers,  556,  569-570 

Senescence  of  tissues,  194 

Serological  methods  for  analysis  of  or- 
ganismal differentials,  5,  6,  8,  129, 
158-163 

Serological  differences  between  reactions 
of  fetal  or  newborn  and  adult  organ- 
isms against  strange  differentials,  524- 
529 

Sherwin,  594 

Shimudzu,  490 

Shirai,   178,  357,  420 

Shope,  357 

Sia,  526 

Siebert,  60,  118,  119,  178,  195,  196 

Silberberg,  145 

Simonnet,   173 

Sittenfield,  368 

Skin  patterns  and  individuality,  457-459 

Skipper,  354 

Skubisrewski,  252 

Smirnova,  181,  357,  421 

Smith,  Carrol,  144 

Smith,  P.  E.,  173 

Smith,  Theobald,  528 

Somatic  mutations  in  transplantation  of 
normal  tissues,  397 

Somatic   mutations   in  tumor  transplanta- 
tion, 372-373,  375-376,  393-394 


INDEX 


709 


Sonneborn,  291,  292,  293 
Spangler,  369 

Species  differences  in  reactions  against  in- 
dividuality  differentials,  28-29 
Species    differentials    of    normal    tissues, 

constancy  of,  397-398 
in   transplantation    of    tumors,   con- 
stancy of,  393-395 
constancy    of,    in    heterogenous    tu- 
mors, 350-351,  352-353,  356 
,  demonstration  by  serological  meth- 
ods, 498-509 

and  anaphylaxis,  502-506 

and  complement  fixation,  502,  504 

and  electrophoresis,  573 

and  hemagglutinins,  502 

and  hemolysins,  501 

,  inhibition  of  reaction  against  them 

by  haptens,  502,  504 

and  precipitins,  498-501 

and  precipitins  in  plants,  500-501 

and    preformed    serum    agglutinins 

and  hemolysins,  506-508 
Specific   adaptation,    14,    16,    17,   292,   293, 
466-468 

in  transplantation  of  normal  tissues 

and  tumors :   see  parts  I  and  IV 

in  action  of  substances  in  autolyzed 

muscle    (cytose),  473 

in  agglutination  of  spermatozoa  by 

egg  extract,  472-473 

in  antifertilizing  action,  473 

in   blood   group   agglutination,    471- 

472 

in  enzyme  action,  473-474 

in  fibrinolysis,  470 

in  hemolysis,  470-471 

between  heterogenous  sera  and  cells, 

508 

in  immune  reactions,  468-469,  474 

in  metamorphosis  of  ascidian  larvae, 

473 

in  phagocytosis,  470 

in  relations  between  host  and  para- 
site, 475 
in  solution  of  egg  membrane  by  ex- 
tract of  spermatozoa,  472-473 

in  tissue  coagulin  effect,  469-470 

Specificity    of    organs,    tissues    and    sub- 
stances, three  types,  466-468 
Spek,  282,  304 
Spemann,  261,  262,  267,  269 
Splenectomy  in  homoiotransplantation,  165 
Spontaneous     and     transplanted     tumors, 

comparison,  437-439 
Stages  in  development  of  psychical   indi- 
viduality, 654-655 
Stalden,  554 
Stanley,  577 
State,  495 
Steinach,  137 


Steffenhagen,  344,  408 

Steinecke,  501,  590 

Steinfeld,  541 

Stern  Fr.,  553 

Stern  K.,  429 

Stern  L.,  179 

Stockard,  182,  227 

Stone,  H.  B.,  583 

Stormont,  151 

Stout,  318 

Strain  differences  in  intensity  of  reactions 
against  individuality  differentials,  29, 
363-383 

Strain  differences  in  transplantation  of  tu- 
mors in  mice,  364,  367,  368 

Strain  of  host  in  its  relation  to  hetero- 
transplantation of  tumors,  349-350, 
355-356 

Strassburger,  18 

zur  Strassen,  237,  240,  241 

Strauss,  E.,  538 

Strauss,  A.  A.,  181 

Strieker,  403 

Strickler,  507 

Stroma  reaction  in  immunity  against  trans- 

,       planted  tumors,  417,  424-426,  434,  436 

Strong,  L.  C,  84,  369,  370,  371,  372,  373, 
382,  437,  438,  439 

Strube,  543 

Struggle,  social  and  natural,  635,  636-638, 
639-642 

Strumia,  470 

Sturm,  346 

Sturtevant,  311 

Substance  specificity,  535,  536 

Summers,  302 

Suggestion,  616,  633-634,  637,  640,  644,  657 

Sumner,  F.  B.,  598,  611 

Sumner,  J.  B.,  474,  575-576 

Siissman,  516 

Svedberg,  566,  572 

Syngenesio-toxin,  8,  12 

Syngenesiotransplantation,  6-8,  72-73,  137, 
138 

—  in  rats,  73-74 

—  in  guinea  pigs,  80-82 

—  in  man,  138 

—  in  birds,  59-63,  136,  138 

—  of  testicles  and  ovaries,  137,  138 

—  of  skin,  138 

—  by  blood  vessel  anastomosis,  of  kidney, 

168 

—  by  pedicle,  170 
von  Szily,  541,  546 


Takewaki,  147 
Tamman,  159,  164 
Taube,  226 

Taylor,  Alfred,  178,  357 
Taylor,  A.  E.,  591 


710 


THE  BIOLOGICAL  BASIS  OF  INDIVIDUALITY 


Teague,  502 

Ten  Broeck,  576 

Tennent,  309,  310,  311 

Testicle,  transplantation  into,  182,  227 

Thacker,  178,  357 

Thiersch,  18,  23 

Thies,  528 

Thomoff,  514 

Thomsen,  483,  525,  587 

Thought  and  extension  of  personality,  656 

—  as  symbol  of  reality  and  as  suggestion, 
619-620 

— ,  will  and  emotion,  657 

Thought  world  and  experienced  world, 
635-636 

Thought  reservoir,  its  significance  for  the 
individual,  652-656 

Thrombus  formation  and  organismal  dif- 
ferentials, 306 

Tiesenhausen,  252 

Tillett,  470,  504 

Tiselius,  573 

Tissue  culture  and  individuality  differen- 
tials, 187-189 

Tissue  differentials,  5,  7,  10,  169 

and  organismal  differentials  in  trans- 
plantations in  amphibian  embryos,  244- 
252 

Tissue  equilibrium,  273-274 

,  isoregulation      and      alloregulation, 

285-286 

,  phylogenetic  and  ontogenetic  evo- 
lution, 283-286 

in  planarians,  214-215 

Tissue  formation  and  organismal  differen- 
tials, 298-306 

in  amoebocytes  and  organismal  dif- 
ferentials, 301    (298-302) 

in  sponges  and  organismal  differen- 
tials, 303-304 

in  Tunicates,  304-305 

in  embryos  and  organismal  differen- 
tials, 305-306 

Tissues  and  organs  in  invertebrates,  fixity 
and  plasticity,  225-226 

,  differences    in    transplantability, 

29-30 

in  the  rat,  74-80 

, in  the  guinea  pig,  80- 

82 

Tissues,  physiology  of,  36,  62,  127 

Todd,  23,  24,  151,  152,  512-514,  515,  516, 

523 
Toxins,    organ    and    organismal    differen- 
tials, 559-564 

— ,  bacterial,  560,  564 

—  in  Paramecia,  292 

—  in  invertebrate  eggs  and  embryos,  241- 

242,  267,  269 

—  in  amphibia,  227,  228,  251-252,  560-561, 

562 


Toxins,  in  reptiles,  561-563 

—  in  snakes,  561-562 

—  in   Heloderma,   562-563 
Transplantation,  methods  of,  30-32,  139 
— ,  methods  of  examination,  137-138 

— ,  as  method  for  analysis  of  organismal 

differentials,  5,  6,  33,  74-75 
— ,  terminology,  35-36 

—  and  athrepsia,  159 

— ,  variable  factors,  32-34,  62,  78-79 

—  and  lack  of  function,  159 

—  and  underfeeding,  145 

—  and  pregnancy,  145 

—  and  immunity,  157-165 

—  by  blood  vessel  anastomosis,  166-169 

—  by  pedicled  flaps,  169-171 

—  and  fertilization,  11,  307-314 

—  and  hybridization,  24,  307-314 

—  and  family,  relationship,  13,  24 

—  multiple,  33-34,  86,  90-91,  103 

—  successive   (serial),  24,  86,  90,  162-163 

of  thyroid  in  inbred  mice,  104-106 

of  ovary,  111 

in  rabbits,  139 

and  immunity,   160-162 

—  and  blood  group  antigens,  170-171 

—  and  age,  59,  60,  87-88,   100 
in   inbred   strains   of   mice,    101- 

104 
in  guinea  pigs  and  rats,  137,  147, 

184-186 
— ,  effect  of  non  genetic  factors,  52,  60, 

61,  62 

—  serial  and  potential  immortality  of  tis- 

sues, 104-105,  190-194 

—  reciprocal,  127-128,  130 

—  interracial,  131-135 

—  and  hormones,  136-137,  139,  143-149 

—  of  adrenal  gland  in  mice,  112-113 

—  of    anterior    hypophysis    in   mice,    111- 

112 

—  of  thyroid  and  parathyroid  in  mice,  113- 

114 

—  of  bone,  bone-marrow  and  cartilage,  78 

—  of  fat  tissue,  78 

—  of  Fallopian  tube,  76-77 

—  of  kidney,  77 

—  of  liver,  77 

—  of  ovary,  75-76 

—  in  inbred  strains  of  mice,  109-111,  98- 

115 

—  of  skin,  75 

—  of  spleen,  77 

— ■  of  striated  muscle,  78 

—  of  testicle,  77-78,  137 

—  of  uterus,  77 

—  of  blood  clots  and  plasma  clots,  effect 

on  blood  cells,  121-123 

—  of  normal  tissues  and  cancer,  338-340, 

433,  439-440 


INDEX 


711 


Transplantation,  of  tumors,  autogenous  and 
homiogenous,  340-347 

,  heterogenous,  347-358 

— and      organismal      differentials, 

432-441 

Transplanted  tumors,  their  growth  in  hy- 
brids, 367,  368-370,  371,  378-379,  380- 
382 

and  organ  and  tissue  differentials,  440 

and  spontaneous  tumors,  relations  be- 
tween, 373,  435 

Transplants  of  tumors  and  metastases,  435 

Transplantability  of  different  tumors,  364 

Transplantation  of  adenoma,  358-362 

Treibman,  489 

Trophoplasm,  19 

Tropisms,  612 

Trypan  blue  in  homoiogenous  transplan- 
tation, 164-165 

Tschistowitch,  22 

Tsurumi,  407 

Tubularia,  204-205 

Tumors,  nature  and  causes ;  their  organ 
and  organismal  differentials,  333-441 

Turn  Suden,  146,  180 

Turner,  G.  D.,  179,  180 

Tuttle,  507 

Turck,  473 

Twitty,  247,  248,  560-561 

Tyler,  A.,  473 

Tyzzer,  24,  96,  158,  343,  363,  367,  368,  369, 
370,  373,  378,  404,  414,  415,  417,  418, 
419,  424,  425,  433,  434,  437,  438 

u 

von  Ubisch,  331 

Uhlenhuth,  E.,  235,  451 

Uhlenhuth,    344,   408,   426,   433,   438,   499, 

511,  524,  530 
Uhlenhuth  effect,  344-345 
Umehara,  358 
Urease  of  Limulus,  specificity  of,  577 


Walsh,  519 

Warm,  617 

Warner,  393 

Weber,  A.,  252,  559 

Webster,  L.  T.,  556 

Weigl,  451 

Weiss,  P.,  263,  276,  277,  279,  448-449 

Weichardt,  510 

Welker,  429,  535,  537,  542 

Wells,  G.  H.,  502-503,  505,  536,  567,  591 

Welsh,  J.  H.,  475 

Welti,  228 

Wense,  145,  147,  179 

Wettstein,  18,  21 

Wetzel,  204 

White,  R.  G.,  512 

White,  P.  R.,  189 

Whitman,  622 

Wieman,  246 

Wiener,  152,  171 

Wigglesworth,  449,  611 

Wilhelmi,  499,  500,  501 

Williamson,  168 

Willier,  253 

Willheim,  429 

Wilms,  252 

Wilson,  H.  V.,  302 

Witebsky,  427,  428,  491-492,  536,  539-540, 

541,  542,  546,  548 
With,  490 
Woglom,  344,  345,  354,  372,  381,  389,  408, 

410,  412,  413,  415,  421,  425,  433,  434, 

436,  437,  438 
Wolfe,  H.  R.,  499,  500 
Wolfe,  J.  M.,  358,  360 
Wound   healing   in   mammals,   autogenous 

tissue  regulation,  306 
Wormall,  567,  569 
Wright,  A.  W.,  358,  360 
Wright,  Sewall,  83,  84,  89 
Wulff,  358 
Wyman,  146,   180 


Veblen,  586 

van  der  Veer,  552,  558 

Velich,  339 

Verworn,  20,  291,  296 

Vickery,  572 

Villata,  164 

Virus   of   chicken   sarcoma,   adaptation  to 

different  species,  356-357 
Vitamins,  578 
Voechting,  218 
Vogel,  142 
Vorlaender,  426 

w 

Waddington,  262,  263 


Xenotransplantation,  261-262,  268-269 
X-rays,  effect  on  transplantation,  177 


Yamagiwa,  414 

Yasuda,  317 

Yves  Delage,  275,  276 


Zakrzewski,  173,  383,  416 
Zangemeister,   516 
Zeinitz,  261,  267 
Zinsser,  507-508,  511 
Zogaya,  570 


THIS  BOOK 
THE 

BIOLOGICAL  BASIS 

OF 

INDIVIDUALITY 

By  Leo  Loeb 

was  set,  printed  and  bound  by  The  Collegiate  Press  of 
Menaslia,  Wisconsin.  The  type  face  is  Linotype  Old 
Style  N-o.  1  set  10  point  on  12  point.  The  type  page  is 
28  x  48  picas.  Tlie  text  paper  is  50-lb  Basis  White 
Stonewall  Eggshell.  The  binding  is  Bancroft  Buckram 
M.   Tire  jacket  is  Hammermill,  Gray,  Ripple  Finish. 


With  THOMAS  BOOKS  careful  attention  is  given  to 
all  details  of  manufacturing  and  design.  It  is  the  Pub- 
lisher's desire  to  present  books  that  are  satisfactory  as 
to  their  physical  qualities  and  artistic  possibilities  and 
appropriate  for  their  particular  use.  THOMAS  BOOKS 
will  be  true  to  those  laws  of  quality  that  assure  a  good, 
name  and  good  will.