4 i uy
Sakti f
iy Hit iH
ity
HO if iN
. it ah st dba
; My eM a i
Mas wi i
Moye
UI
hit
Me
wate pied
Raa DE
Papier Soa :
oe
aS Sse
ent
f
of
{
"\
ERE Ei
i
oS
Saas
Lee
=
pes
is
Saree
pig eae
OR
sev aan dune:
ce, rf nee
alate aaa
HA ay
hate
SSF
ae
Lan
mn at “ Ady
Pick
j
ne 2d6
ee Ae
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
_ BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 138
STONE MONUMENTS OF
SOUTHERN MEXICO
By A;
MATTHEW W; STIRLING
CHRCULA TIN:
ied A Gory,
y7/ ~
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 138
STONE MONUMENTS OF
SOUTHERN MEXICO
By
MATTHEW W. STIRLING
UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1948
I A a ee OL
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D. C. Price 35 cents
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
SmirHsonran INstiruTIon,
Bureau or AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY,
Washington, D. C., March 1, 1943.
Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled
“Stone Monuments of Southern Mexico,” by Matthew W. Stirling,
and to recommend that it be published as a bulletin of the Bureau of
American Ethnology.
Very respectfully yours,
M. W. Stim.ine, Chief.
Dr. C. G. Azssor,
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution.
It
WAAPAER FEY,
. , oo mr
wc 546
CONTENTS
PAGE
Mia Gltl CGI Tey c= eat em aes ee SIO cre a er ae ae eee 21 espe et ee 1
") SpzS EDP HESS SN eed id anche east ele een aL A Oy Ne ne ea 4
Roemmnapiny, OF be rSibes Seto a i eee a 2 PN ee ape Maree cren 8
SOME RIMOLUITD GTA LS cst Stave itr yan vanes eR MEAL Se ger T ee Leydig ns epee te 11
SHEETS eae eh pe rs ees (ey ed Oy eee ADR oct 2m AiR le had a a re es ital
AS Gree Lenawee 5 8 Pla com Bry ais hare sh inns 7 WiC eS a at Re eee Van re He 14
SG el sap is eal a Ag Ree es A NAN) LVEF leer ee arcs Weteaa 14
RSE Lek Wed) ES eo ae cero ee rte Ce crs NOEL AP AMIN I eet ta ee eee AY I Be 14
Cy eed ya] Dp Se tec a ae Die ot pepe paired ys otek ly ae at aa 16
ANAC) TAUIIT NN TIE HA ae eye es eet FPN TR ae Wes a el Se ea 16
TESA TOES EM Bel Be ge re ak at Nan an ae CEG SRY val oe ately Spe lage, se W7/
Wi lcorannraaveval el Clete Ses 5 Ses alpen ase at oe Salat AT sah Eas 18
IMOHUIMeNtT DEE ar eem rei 2h! 08 Baie ae ee ee ee 21
PVE OTUUETTNG Inte ener cena ters Shei RRM a eR at Inte toy aes ee ae Ea il
Nd ora eee OVEN a Fie ech eee), ak ey SR a S24 aoa tad fe nye heen 22,
Monument) Genesee Rtas: I ay a ENE ey Ae Ae RI SS 22,
PINT OTA UTI GTi Gspt de Te pee ae FSU Ek Ste a Ege Ua ge 23
RManuments le and Ane 22> ot Se ae Re ee 23
MaG@N ane Ta VEN ) CEL Ne 5 oN oa a ie eM Re AM Sr Tyna hash te NSM ea eee a LD aa peat 24
IA GyaNTOTAVE TAHSIN CFs ya KO Ie TN teh onete Lar emeMt emai A | ASE Nol a A alee Mia aye 24
IVA AUNTS 11 SO) sa 10 Cll ee a Me 6 a ee a gar ve eg Cle Oe 24
JEYo\EbavGu-(ero) Wbbaanake Water cons Che a MeN Een em Mea Sey yd ate teat a Cl ut ted Salis ais 25
PSAR(OEYS! 1 51 Fe 09m 001 pale es SOs ah eR EL ho apy i a pe I 25
SEQUELS EST LEV: yee RI tea 2 dy eal Re ak DR yl ate Ss We cB pla 26
Sif O50 oy 0 eh | 0) a SUR le 2 0 a MR Aa es RC yn ap ee 26
bar Rbuentes sn 8 6 2 es ee oy Nah ae I Sak 3 lig ett Cees sh ls Cease i 26
CPTEDS YEN C65 if ga De ges Sh AR I get nt pesado 26
Serva AY Beret Spe es en Ace aes ode ele ee ye OO ES a NN ce en A Sule ae ty i
The Arroyo San Juan and the Rio Tecolapan----------_---------- 27
WOTCIUS Ore ees A tes Ceres feee ase rag te ae alee BN Anal AYE SAEEN 28 30
Wernordedlas dies scene em nue pee mpm crs le ee ater ae poets AV ran te 31
AS Gres el ea eta alta cra ae age a AE scree Re pe gS na pap gE ON ee eR 33
S Fe a al tal WsaP A OI ee Nfl hd ON See Ue pe tee npc aR VES Rr eieaet SP 33
(SUPE Shs MeN a Ss ihe We ae ER eel eM Oe eae DSi aed ee re ee 33
Se ee Are mee tae ec caesar Mn WE alee: tc N NS ok REA LI pi Mn aL II LW ON OE RA IE 34
KS Ge eae tee meta fa feo Say hs ee pee he USN Nt eee Samual? he 35
SS Gee Lea meee a cin Mee adr o) v Seen her ne ap a es tn SR Rg PB REP ae 35
SEEN RSs ae OS PE ee Mey steer eed LI a Lote Mae pL kM Sane Ahaha seat Cana 39
GS Hel a1 See a arate mee tg Sco Fe NT Ne Ne ai Ue pre Hote aL AE GUE Ce Re 41
FB bay SOT il hp al a Mg oe Sl MR ae ce pa AG
tS etyed Foy TUCO) 2) 2s gem Ly ON aa ea OE RRA PAD, AR ESE CM al a AR nls AE 42
SSH 1 cams eeeraere ep pee iee ape a! A NE raat Te EAR eS RL LNG pr legs ye ALE RD ES Sey 43
SES Le ee re ne RL ST pL LS eral A ty BBR OR dad a de 2p 43
SS Ged Seedpeer mc ods) el DIL waa ay Nap be Ne Fa uP UN ASL SORE PS 43
Seen LA le Alle AL Filet Ne AA Me aa ey) OSA RU pyr eR mn Fs 44
IV CONTENTS
Cerro de las Mesas—Continued. PAGE
PSL e) fe od etc We a peph a cs a aN RAI Mem Ee GT pene LS RAR 44
Miomimle ntl ys Ac cee SE ck DTN a ed ey rn ee a a ay Ae ae 44
NMC WA UATY NE Ta Gi aac eg ts Tac he I ye Ip Pa 45
IVOTITINE Gh ee Se ER Se Pe ee ee 45
AVRO MTS TG CA Se Ue a 0a a a SAS AOR Ee Le aD 45
1A Wo ab oa ves oy hits pre meeh sS eel ek INN a A Cen vA ee Bes Dee ele ere Tyas ae Bgl St, 45
VU WN NYY Gn ty Gees ea ee Ye SEEN YS Slt ORT ey Oe pee 46
INTO TIMING Tt sips ee eee ee het (OANA 8 en ce Te nce 46
INTO UTITE TAG HS eee TA, Tap Saeco, tee ol 46
IMGiscellameo Use sek 2 RD SRP eGR AE Edy aN ie Cee CTA ae ie 47
@omelusion.:£e ees ae Oi eee tiny ce a)! oe i a ea 47
TG SRV TU coe ee Se A ae RS AIL Nhe oc 48
tel aa wiars So %6 Wha vanee aL pany ake BAe od Jt ee 50
RGR 0 es alee ark ra ah aE Ps Maes Sg a IO Cade TEE pee Ps LRU a 50
tela eee Sead Bienen UN IDG UIL Ns bik de Jel. Ides ek en Moe 51
Se Leeda teen aie ok Bap ty cs OCS lee BL tote lg) 21on) eel Sen ee rr 52
Stelayo ee aes Sia eS es ee teow eee SAE ee ser el ee 52
PAV GE Te Ee Se Saas PO ed nem 1 Sas Be Roa ee a OAR Sage) NY 52
oi Sk Aa eee pea eect le is Set De op GEER nme en! eee Oe aa MOTEL SST 53
J Nhs Ox Veale AS OR SAE Shy RE SNE Das Ae eed bea eR OM RE Ea Sone ty OS 53
PAN GSN A eee Aiea = eee ea Ee ah ER ue ERE Vile Une BS pet 54
GA Gears iy Me er eh eS gee Nees a es aR 55
RIGA ieee eth See ty te tase BRIE PUAN 2 eo tel eae oe Oe 56
Vio mim emt ers ae re see a ee ae et 56
Mime rise epee sce lls Cy SUN AGE Lele aps 10 ee ie 57
Monmumentiote sec ere oa ee tus ee ks pe eas Sle See ye ee LY (
IN Koyant bon Yep otic bee aay Sven a Ann EOA De HNMR Sed OE SOUENE Gee Ce a PC lS Ot 58
VEOTUUIMIE TG 5 tts ree erecta PN en ad ee Sl ee LD oe en a ee 58
‘Dhesstone Gnclosure sas. S420. eek fey Ds ee Oi a aa oe 59
MonIIMentOee esse oe Ses ne oN Ak We ee ee ee 59
INFO TRUIIE TG Re OFS OS hoe Ses EN | BR Us sen e 59
Stonercolumnse see a2 ae Lr es 2 See 60
Wonelusveo mee sa er ee 0 eat BS RE RL ea) 60
LAT GENS aS IP ae PG eR RTP, SS SMe ite Nned Meee LYON 61
(GAG) sips, Oe OR nea SEANAD MA RI NN Wy), SAME MBNA epee I Ee 62
Stelav ts sobs Oh bee BAe Me a ek de 62
AT Gage ee Bayo Sha eh es ree ay sey), 62
RS GOS ate Us LCE AR Ripa oO Be UN MR, CO Ly 3 2) nl 63
ASSN Fs Hs ie aes err Ba AD DIM RL MV Da ne AES Ona RM On ual PRR UE SETS 63
PANG aro Nee. Hae LS Moe ie Rs OL Se RE yt a LY eee lon 63
SS Ge Ter Oh LR eE OAS NC hae eee Otc et ne 63
Steeda ye Sia a a EN Nl hc ga eae ly A pa ein SR el ee 64
SNUG Tet she ey Se Rei RE MON 8 ha ty La nn YR a 65
INA TUE 1G ts A dR aU DFS a ee 65
Sela tGir See aa fae ee I Sn i 8 hg 65
UAT Gea Ale dh My Lat, The AS A DD ne 65
So say fear Oe i eRe es ae ke need oe) S OS 66
(CTC Ui Op! Ma ees eee OR MeO TSE aR Lo Dele Me bt ee 66
Se) Cn tc ee aaa RIP cp aie aime ROT EN Ce WES INE Ale areca tL ge) eth 78 3. 66
DA Ee oa ee ean me SI ey le RAR el eh oohe uae eV a Cee | 4 66
Sela Obey ee satis ah alin eR Mea om a haha erat hl Ree ae 66
DAML Gare Gg tes 2 eect ae ea Ug fo 208 ae mp a ce Oo a 67
ILLUSTRATIONS Vv
Izapa—Continued.
Group B—Continued. PAGE
Tol (a ag a Ps See inde We Ut 04s Chara UL 67
Sire) oo EGR WLS EVEL Ol ites cy a 2a hoy 0 a Tee (cha Meg ee Wie eee 67
Stelaplyee We eibike as | ee ape tee eee ee ia wees Pete et. Cio aby 67
PAN GATES). Baler Wh eee O Se ce SN OG to sata Mle Ae A as ey Uae an yh 68
IMrontmemt 228: ht 2 ANS dae, Pane a tips ea Mele ee feeb aie dp ate et 68
KETO UPD Cee Se eG OS Ok A Ree Ud are de a arte gab est pe Cie Ni A ML 2 68
STCLAPE GES Bee a. lene AA eill as Nay El piel Dilan Pah Bi ual Leet 69
JN Dee a BORSA Sods uve Aenean ene YC ia kV Te ee ne 69
SCL AIA re 2 oa Se to Ne aI a eat a eR ge et eS Sesh 2 69
/NLG2) eel 0a ee A RoE Sh eh oes Ana EL BS OA Sh nS teh 69
ORAS) Ey 1 ED fee SR A Real UWE rcs, ee, MPO MRM REWER) CMa oe, RE se eS 69
PAG ATO 78) ep So Seg Ra gL weet or oN NOME oe ee) MRA 69
SHTSLE AEG ee FR MG er A erie Seanad PRM cee ebro ALUN EE fey Weiiiga LS 69
PANG are S02 eee Bice ged ay hy es 0) hae eres, Fee ae hes 8 ah Z 69
PANT Garry Seas OE ge peal yy RT Bs ok 8 7 a ed ne a pepe hg cots Rela 70
Stel veins es he ee a ERS ae NE Ne 70
CTOUPIO ose OU See td | BA ee ae ee a one 70
S Lela Se Leite ah deh ARS CO MR Ce. ea 70
PAG To Arete VIM Pe wb ar on Ad oe ae ee a 70
PAU GS) Toll Cj ee ee pg eS 2 Oe ke gered ay = 0,2 fea OR 71
GHROUTO} pss Oe EE ere eh Re eee ee EE hak Stop wah s 71
Ste lap Omar tert. aha cee eS oS 2 SAYRE 2 [pipe OR preanipnsh 5 py 71
PNG ATG e etna SES Cae oe 2 CRs ayS Ve Oe oem EL eal
SSI EE Pd Oe PS SR ee ee ee SME ger Tie cP L Ye, Mee he fees 71
PANE ci Tegil (eee ee ets ah ELE A hn AS SS ach a Mg Ae 71
(Gao) oF he ee heath bat Aen Names WA SENT VETO Nees QaWe ae RE ce ees eee e Meree MALE oF the ines © 71
Wonunrent see We oo 2 es pete eT Re eae a2
INT OT NUIT TEA pene Sry 5 x cB 8S I an a2,
CONC S1O ese ee eee AGN LIS Lh EI ie ree eth hte ee aes Us en 72
2B LED STAN Ai lg oy RR re eS ee pe wee ee Veal Se | 74
TG xen eae erearn rp gn ES ne ee Ee eee 77
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATES
(All plates at end of book)
(Tres Zapotes)
1. The village of Tres Zapotes.
2. a, View showing typical slough in the lower Papaloapan Basin. 6b, General
view of Group 2 showing Stela A in the foreground. Left background
shows the long mound.
a, The principal mound of Group 2. 0b. The long mound.
. a, The Colossal Head. b, Rear view of the Colossal Head.
. Monument C, side A: The carved stone box.
a, Monument C, side B. 06, Monument C, side C. c, Monument C, side D.
a, Monument B, plain stone box. 6, Stela B. c, Stela E.
. d, Monument F. 0b, Monument G. c, Under side of Monument G.
a, Monument I, front view. 6, Monument I, rear view. c, Monuments J
and K.
10. a, Monument N. b, Monument D. c, Monument H.
DOADM Aw
ILLUSTRATIONS
. ad, Monument L. 0b, Monument M, front view. c, Monument M, side view.
d, Monument M, rear view.
. a, Stela A. 0b, Stela A, side view.
. a, Stone arm from La Puente. b, Stone platform.
. a, Stela D, front view. 0b, Stela D, south side. c, Stela D, north side.
. a, Curved stairway of sandstone flags. b, Stone jaguar from Tlapacoya.
ec, Stone column. d, Stone-lined fire pit.
. a, Carved stela of columnar basalt near El Meson. 0b, Stone with petroglyphs,
San Juan River. c¢, Stone head from San Marcos. d, Jaguar incised on
stone near Lirios.
. Monument GC. a, Side A. 0b, Side B.
. Monument C. a, Side C. 0b, Side D.
(Cerro de las Mesas)
. a, View of expedition camp at Cerro de las Mesas site. 0, View of the
monument plaza after excavation, Cerro de las Mesas.
. a, Stelal. 0b, Stela2. c, Stela 14.
. a, Stela 3. 0b, Stela 4. ec, Stela 9.
. a, Stela 5. 0b, Stela 15.
. Stela 6.
. Stela 8.
. ad, Stela10. 06, Stela 11.
. Left, monument 2; right, Stela 7.
. a, Stela 13. 6, Monument 2, back.
. Monument 5, two views.
. Monument 1, two views.
. a, Monument 7. b, Monument 4. c, Monument 8. d, Monument 3.
. a, Monument 2. _ 0, Stela 7.
(La Venta)
. a, View of the swamp between La Venta and the Blasillo River. 6, The
village of La Venta.
. a, Stela 1. b, Stela 5. c, Stela 4. d, Stela 4, showing scorings on base.
. a, Stela 2, south side. 0, Stela 2, north side.
. Stela 8.
. a, Altar 1, front. 6, Altar 1, north side. c, Altar 1, south side.
. a, Altar 4, front. 6, Altar 4, south side.
. a, Altar6. b, Altar 4, north side. c, Altar 2.
. ad, Altar 3, front. 6b, Altar 3, west Side.
. Altar 5, front.
. a, Altar 5, south end. 6, Altar 5, north end.
. @, Monument 1. 0b, Monument 3.
. a, Monument 2, side. 6b, Monument 2, front.
. a, Monument 4, front. 6, Monument 4, back.
. d, Monument 5. b, Stone column at base of Cerro Encantado.
. a, Northwest corner of the stone enclosure, partially excavated. 6, Large
stone column on the south end of the long mound.
. a, Monument 6. The stone sarcophagus with part of the lid removed. 8,
North end of Monument 6; design restored.
. Monument 7. a, Stone tomb before removal of the columns closing the north
entrance. 6, Stone tomb after excavation, showing limestone burial plat-
form in the rear.
49.
50.
51.
52.
_ 53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
ohne Genser
ILLUSTRATIONS
(Izapa)
a, Stela 1. 6, Stela 2.
a, Stela 3 and Altar 2. b, Stela 6 and Altar 4.
a, Stela 4. 0, Stela 7.
Stela 5.
a, Stela 11. 6, Monument 2.
Stela 12.
a, Stela 18, front. 6, Stela 18, north side. c, Stela 18, south side.
a, Stela 9 and Altar 6. 5b, Stela 10.
a, Stela 19, Altar 16. 0b, Stela 20, Altar 17.
a, Stela 8, Altar 5. 6b, Monument 1.
a, Altar 3. 6, Altar 1.
a, Stela 13, Altar 9. 6, Stela 16, Altar 12. ¢, Stela 15, Altar 11. d,
Monument 3.
a, Stela 14, Altar 10. 0b, Stela 17. c, Altar 18. d, Altar 15.
a and 6, Monument 4. c, Large stone mortar.
TEXT FIGURES
(Tres Zapotes)
. Monument E. Numerical inscription carved on base rock on the bed
GH He LATROV Oe edae Wil CO Sd a eis De SNe
. Monument O. One of two similar stone carvings on the bed of the
SATEY; CLV Ree eae ere see ttl a a ips NER See LOE SARE Dt 2 PY SIN ea nee
. Petroglyphs on a large boulder near Lirios__...______________-______
(Cerro de las Mesas)
. Carved monument from Santa Lucia Cozumalhualpa_-_____________-
» ‘Glyph column’ on Stela 6; partly restored__---. 22. 222-2 eee
. a, Stela 5. 6b, The Stela of San Miguel Chapultepec. c, Stela 3_____
PE SUELO sO Le La GA" Cy UCLA Gece 2 ns ig i aa at) ee ete) ee
. a, Stela 14. 6b, Stela 11. c, Stela 13. d, Monument 2, back______-
SE MOMUIMEM Gr ta TOMPAVIG WA es eee rl 2 betes ee WN
5 Gy Tey I, Ue The 2h ee hahha Se ee
NP Te Der wii
VD et oan
va i
i aE or) o f
‘LA, ral
re ¥ i
Lie, His b *
or 7”
oF ih Si ae pire aa
Cae ey pA fF, akk et bral | tatid raphe tak 23 ‘Te
Rata PERE a Ae NE? Se ete get We:
Pa tae Pht Hans Nea Ry MANY Hah: Line Ue ae % bs
— "se Pek’ 4 Ae
SULA kai ij :
one ww) i MNh yt od ny tea en j i a i" yd
ty Roane eos iat fen onal hte’ tt is" inne
Bs Se ON I ONT eA a Papetion ane
> Ae 1) Sian a, Dine tba 9 Oh ph and A) AEST, a Leann | ft
{ i ere mrt ee: Vole F um ah Reena tices 0 ra & Haine a ‘te aE
US CES ea a eA A Ese Rs de ist
ey ce AY aA GT bed) 8 ky vil, ‘ay waar. A ds baer a
| : P res + Ae. fie haa avr:
oe ka tate at Pe es ae ‘Du: ie
We ee Viren gree | ae “Poe Si» WAND ‘he - Valea
Oy Lah REDE ea a, REN a oy :
mAs? hy ee ee Me: seas Ay) he . Sa ;
4 ¢ a> ae an Memes) ae, a4} Lanwagay sal S
ey Ray Peta ae ce airy wad Ce .
1! ars, ya age vice any 4044
+ oe B Rid? any ind j cp nd ist a joni
fd i. i % with rea ma bya ena eer asia et el bt 1 : ie ae
Bee Ae Po REO ata
| \ ay Y Ae ; . “f ¥ “ ni mt wh Ve oma xa nie
ny rag Hyai San ong ity én any 7m)
ac ; mings! Sega! cm a ae ae '
: a wie Hes Any 7S ak
Say Walge a hee nue
NA cae ‘ tee Ni Na bea 2
aie i Wer Ni sala pa a 4
t)
i adele vale oe
4 ie 1 ah As
; a
STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO
By Matruaew W. STIRLING
INTRODUCTION
The practice of carving and erecting large stone monuments was
one of the conspicuous achievements of the aborigines of tropical
America, from northwestern South America to and including a con-
siderable area of southern Mexico. In the south this practice was
most common in Peru and Colombia. From this region northward,
the distribution is more or less continuous. From the State of Oaxaca
in Mexico the distribution is northward, and carries through the Valley
of Mexico and most of the State of Veracruz, but does not follow up
the Pacific slope much beyond the State of Oaxaca. The monument-
carving custom reached its apex in the Maya area, where it was most
frequently employed in connection with the use of the calendar
system of that area. Although the art styles employed and the nature
of the monuments differ considerably through this rather large region,
it seems evident that a certain interrelationship exists, an understand-
ing of which should cast considerable light on the chronologies and
pre-Columbian cultural exchanges between the two continents, espe-
cially since the monument-distribution area involves most of the high-
culture centers of the New World. The purpose of this paper is not
to offer any solution of this broad problem, but to present some new
and some little-known evidence concerning the region west of the
Maya area which may contribute to chronological and distributional
knowledge of the northern sector of the general monument region.
The material here presented represents one of the byproducts of
four seasons of archeological field work conducted under the direction
of the writer for the Smithsonian Institution and the National Geo-
graphic Society. This work in turn is part of a larger plan inaugu-
rated in 1932 by the Bureau of American Ethnology for the purpose
of studying cultural sequences in Middle America by attacking the
archeological problems of the eastern and western margins of the
Maya area, with the idea of determining relationships with the better-
known pre-Columbian Maya. Work on the eastern margin was begun
in 1933 under the direction of William Duncan Strong and terminated
by him in 1936, the preliminary results of which have been published
a
2, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 138
(Strong, 1938). In 1938 the writer began his work with a prelimin-
ary survey of the western margin. In the winter of 1938-89 excava-
tions were conducted at Tres Zapotes during a period of 4 months.
The writer was assisted in the field by Dr. C. W. Weiant. The
expedition was also accompanied by E. G. Cassedy, artist of the staff
of the Bureau of American Ethnology, and by Richard Stewart, staff
photographer of the National Geographic Society. Marion Stirling
\oZA VENTA
i rs
GULF OF TEHUANTEPEC
GULF
OF
- ‘ IZAPAN, OF
MEXICO AN he
Bian 22
Na
es
/
60 100
STATUTE MILES » SS
Figure 1.—General map of southern Mexico.
and Marian Weiant also accompanied the expedition and participated
in the work (Stirling, 1939).
The excavations at Tres Zapotes were resumed during the season
of 1939-40. Dr. Philip Drucker accompanied the writer as assistant
archeologist, and was specifically concerned with the stratigraphic
excavations. Mr. Stewart and Marion Stirling were again members
of the party. During the progress of the work at ‘Tres Zapotes, the
site of La Venta in northern Tabasco was visited for the purpose of
STIRLING ] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTITZERN MEXICO 3
excavating and photographing the stone monuments there. Ten days
were spent at this task (Stirling, 1940 b).
The same party returned to the field for the season of 1940-41,
when 4 months were spent excavating the site of Cerro de las Mesas
in Veracruz. An additional trip was made to the State of Chiapas,
where 7 days were occupied in excavating and photographing the
stone monuments at Izapa, in the southern corner of that State
(Stirling, 1941).
As a result of observations in the region west of the Maya area,
it would seem that a stela cult flourished at a relatively early date,
involving among other things the worship of a jaguar being and the
use of a ceremonial calendar. Together with the erection of stelae
is found the practice of setting up altars and colossal stone heads. In
the case of the early monuments, thé physical type represented is the
so-called Olmec, or La Venta, with flat nose and heavy drooping mouth.
Stelae are frequently carved in the highly conventionalized form of
a jaguar head with open mouth, in which various figures are repre-
sented in full relief or low relief. If one could assume an evolution
of art style, it would seem that the more realistic representations of
this form would be early and the more highly conventionalized, rela-
tively later. Realistic forms would be represented by Stela D, Tres
Zapotes; Stela 1, La Venta; and Monument 2, Izapa.
At Cerro de las Mesas; Tres Zapotes, Izapa, and La Venta, the
“tiger mask” panel was utilized as a decorative motive on stelae, a
feature which occurs also in Maya art.
The existence of carved stone stelae in Veracruz has been com-
mented upon frequently by various writers. Perhaps the best known
are two similar monuments from the vicinity of Huilocintla, repre-
senting Quetzalcoatl in the penetential rite of drawing a stick through
his tongue (Seler, 1906). One of these is in the National Museum
of Mexico. Another interesting stone, also in the National Museum,
is the stela of Tepatlaxco, the relief on which shows a bearded stand-
ing figure, probably a ball player, being assisted with his gear by
another person (Seler, 1906). Still another is the stela of Alvarado,
a tall pillar of columnar basalt which has carved on it a standing
figure before a kneeling bound captive. This stone has on one side
what appears to be a badly eroded glyph column. The similarity of
this monument to one at a mound site near El Meson is commented
upon later. Also in the National Museum is the so-called stone of
Chapultepec. This monument is of particular interest to the present
account since its design practically duplicates that of Stela 5 at
Cerro de las Mesas. This stone is supposed to have come not from
the hill of Chapultepec in the Federal District, but from the village
of Chapultepec south of Mexico City. It is highly improbable that
4 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 138
this could have been its place of origin, and it seems fairly safe to
assign it on stylistic grounds to southern Veracruz. Dr. Spinden
gave the verbal opinion to me that it probably came from Cerro de las
Mesas.
The writer wishes to express his indebtedness to Richard Stewart,
of the National Geographic Society, who is responsible for most of
the photographs; to Edwin G. Cassedy, of the Bureau of American
Ethnology, for the drawings of Tres Zapotes monuments; and to
Miguel Covarrubias for the drawings of the monuments of Cerro de
las Mesas. All of the drawings reproduced are from sketches made
in the field. Mr. Covarrubias has not only contributed this valuable
addition to the report, but the writer has profited greatly from his
profound knowledge of the art and archeology of the early cultures
of Mexico, in which field he is without question one of the outstanding
authorities. Dr. Weiant is responsible for assembling the early his-
torical data on the Tres Zapotes region, and Dr. Drucker for the
geological and topographical material for the same area.
Most of all, acknowledgments are due to Dr. Alfonso Caso, Director
of the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia y Historia of Mexico, and
to Arquitecto Ignacio Marquina, Director of the Departamento de
Monumentos Prehispanicos. Not only in their official positions have
they done everything possible to encourage and facilitate the work,
but by giving freely of their personal knowledge of Mexican
archeology have contributed many ideas which have added to the
value of the report. The same might be said for all of the staff of
the Instituto Nacional, whose cooperation has been a source of great
personal pleasure to the writer; in particular, Eduardo Noguera and
Juan Valenzuela have willingly given their time and advice.
A particular description of the four principal sites excavated by
the expedition follows.
TRES ZAPOTES
The present village of Tres Zapotes is occupied by agriculturists
who depend for their living upon an ejido apportioned to them out
of the lands of the old Hacienda de Hueyapan, once the property
of the Mimendi family and in earlier times part of an estate be-
longing to a nephew of Hernan Cortés. It is within the jurisdiction
of the municipality of Santiago Tuxtla. Geographically, it lies
about midway between the important towns of Tlacotalpan and San
Andrés Tuxtla, in the southeastern part of the State of Veracruz.
What for our purposes is more important is that it is also situated
about midway between the Valley of Mexico to the northwest and
Old Empire Maya cities to the southeast. It is most conveniently
reached from 'Tlacotalpan, whence one can go by gasoline launch via
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 5
the San Juan River and connecting waterways as far as the Boca
de San Miguel—a 5-hour trip, if one has luck—and thence another
2 hours by horseback. It lies within a day’s journey by horseback
from the Gulf Coast (pl. 1).
By modern standards the village may justly be termed isolated.
There are people here who have never been to Tlacotalpan, and
some who have made the trip but once or twice in their lives. Few
have traveled farther afield than Catemaco, there to attend the annual
Holy Week celebrations, and anyone who has visited Mexico City
rates as a world traveler. So much outside the main current of
Mexican life is Tres Zapotes that one still hears many. of the forms
and idioms of sixteenth-century Spanish in daily conversation.
These considerations, however, do not argue for similar isolation
in pre-Cortesian times. That close ties with the Valley of Mexico
had been established by the fifteenth century is a matter of history.
Tlacotalpan and 21 other towns of the region were required to pay
tribute to Montezuma in the form of fine cloths, women’s garments,
weapons and insignia, jewels of gold, ornaments of amber, cacao, pre-
cious stones and feathers, fine liquid amber, and “skins” made of rubber
(Codex Mendoza, quoted by Paso y Troncoso, 1905). Moreover, Na-
huatl had become the prevailing language. Coastal waters and trib-
utary streams furnished easy access by small boats to territory to the
north and the east. Toward the southeast jungles may have offered
some obstacle to travel, especially during the long rainy season,
although hardly to the extent that this is true today, if we are to
judge by the number of archeological sites now enshrouded by the
jungle. Mountain barriers to the southwest can hardly have been
insurmountable, for even today mule-packs occasionally travel over-
land as far as Oaxaca, thus connecting with the routes once followed
by Alvarado and Cortés on their excursions into Central America,
routes which had long before been established by their aboriginal
predecessors.
It is apparent, therefore, that the aboriginal inhabitants were quite
favorably situated to influence and to be influenced by the successive
waves of culture which flourished in pre-Conquest times in adjacent
coastal areas, in Yucatan, on the great Mexican plateau, and in Central
America.
Early data on this region are very meager. Bernal Diaz, in his
account of the itinerary of Juan de Grijalva, notes that Alvarado
entered the Papaloapan River and went as far upstream as the town
of Tlacotalpan (Diaz del Castillo, 1928).
From the Relacién de Tlacotalpan y Su Partido (Paso y Tron-
coso, 1905, t. 5) we learn that Tlacotalpan was considered a healthful
place. Storms from the Gulf, “nortes,” are reported as occurring from
6 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY ‘BULL. 138
August to February, although sometimes a month would elapse with-
out one. Strong windstorms from the south, “sures,” were also
common. Fruits extensively cultivated included zapotes, chicoza-
potes, guayabas, and aguacates; while among the vegetables beans
maize, squash, chiles, tomatoes, sweetpotatoes, and xicamas, a root
tasting very much like the turnip, figured prominently. Floods were
frequent, and they often destroyed the plantings of maize and sweet-
potatoes. Among the fauna are mentioned deer, turkeys, aquatic
birds, armadillos, lizards, and turtles. Fishing and the trading of fish
constituted a major industry. All kinds of pottery were made (“loza
de todas maneras”). A little salt was prepared from sea water, but
it was of poor quality. Most of the salt used was imported by boat
from Campeche. Sickness was treated with herbs. People lived in
dwellings of palm and thatch of the same sort as those built today.
Men wore their hair long, dressed in cotton and skins, and used loin
cloths 2 yards long. They worshipped a female deity made of green-
stone, which was taken once a year to the river and given a bath.
At this time there was a human sacrifice with a ceremony attended
only by the important personages of the town.
Of Tuxtla, the same source tells us that the people spoke a rude
dialect of Mexicano (Nahuatl), employing certain sounds not heard
in the vicinity of the Mexican capital; that they dressed in white
cotton cloths, often decorated with painted designs, and wore loin
cloths from which hung tassels; that they carried on war with Guaz-
aqualco (Coatzcalco), using arrows, war clubs, flint knives, and
shields made from the bark of strong cane; and that they put a
kind of pepper which grew on a tree into their chocolate and their
medicines. It is reported, further, that sexual intercourse was pro-
hibited among them until they were “of much age,” and that they
were very healthy. They worshipped Uitzilopochtli, a god evidently
imposed by the Aztecs. To this god slaves were sacrificed by priests
who “did not know women.” The variety of animals mentioned in
connection with Tuxtla is greater than that given for Tlacotalpan; it
includes wildcats, jaguars, coyotes, monkeys, squirrels, and rabbits.
Parrots, also, get special mention. One custom is noteworthy, the
heads of children were flattened by the mother or by the midwife who
attended their birth.
In addition to the foregoing, we have, as further clues to the
ethnic composition of the region, data generously supplied by Prof.
Paul Kirchhoff and his colleague Arturo Monzoén, of Mexico, D. F.,
taken from the Archivo General de la Nacién (vol. 70). From two re-
laciones of the year 1600 bearing upon ecclesiastical matters in towns
along the Rio de Alvarado and in the vicinity of Tlacotalpan, it
would appear that Mexicano was everywhere spoken. Of Cozumal-
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 7
hualpa it is stated, however, that both Mexicano and Mixtec were
spoken, but that Mixtec was preferred. Again, of Mistlin it is
stated that, although the people spoke Mexicano, they were of the
Mixtec and Popoluca tribes. These references to the presence of
Mixtec-speaking groups so far east are rather surprising and should
be kept in mind for their possible bearing on the interpretation of
material found at Tres Zapotes. There is nowhere any mention
that Totonac was spoken in any of these towns, and this is in con-
formity with Krickeberg’s map of Totonacapan (Krickeberg, 1933),
which places the southern and eastern boundary of Totonac terri-
tory well to the west of Tres Zapotes, stopping at the Papaloapan
River.
Despite the scant attention that it has received until recently, the
site has been known to archeologists for nearly three-quarters of a
century. As early as 1869,.J. M. Melgar published an account of sev-
eral excursions to a place neighboring San Andrés Tuxtla in which
he referred to certain excavations of a cabeza colosal (Melgar, 1869).
Two years later he released a study dealing with the antiquity and
origin of the giant head in which he emphasized its “Ethiopian”
features, features which have since been identified with the style of
art called Olmec (Melgar, 1871). Thereafter, the Cabeza Colosal
de Hueyapan-(so named from the old Hacienda, though actually
much closer to the village of Tres Zapotes than to the modern village
of Hueyapan) had won a permanent place in the register of Mexican
archeological monuments.
_ In 1892 an Exposicién Histérico-Americana was held in Madrid.
According to del Paso y Troncoso’s catalog of the Mexican section,
the Museo Nacional of Mexico, in preparation for this exposition,
sent an expedition to Hueyapan, lasting 15 days, with the object of
obtaining specimens. Precisely where and how these specimens were
obtained is not recorded.
Karly in the present century, the Selers traveled through the Tuxtla
region, took photographs of the Cabeza Colosal and other stone
monuments, and made a collection of pottery and figurines which they
appear to have obtained largely by purchase. Their reports make
no mention of the many mounds near Tres Zapotes (Seler-Sachs,
1922).
Probably the first to sense the genuine archeological importance of
the locality was Albert Weyerstall (1932), whose observations did
much to intensify the writer’s interest in the site.
Early in 1938 the writer visited the site and determined to undertake
excavations there. The National Geographic Society became inter-
ested in the project and agreed td finance it. In December 1938, a camp
was established and the first of two seasons’ work begun.
8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 138
GEOGRAPHY OF THE SITE
The Tres Zapotes archeological site lies in the west-central portion
of the district of Los Tuxtlas nearly at the foot of Tuxtla Mountain.
Although within the coastal plain physiographic area, the district in
which the site lies, in fact most of the region, is a low upland (pl. 2, bd).
Instead of the flat plains crisscrossed with sloughs that border the
Bay of Alvarado and flank the Papaloapan and lower San Juan Rivers,
there are series after series of small but abrupt ridges and plateaus.
These are the remnants of a heavily eroded peneplain of sedimentary
origin.2, Above tower the volcanic formations whose major peaks are
Tuxtla and San Martin. Down the sides of the peaks race innumerable
streams. As they flow through the gullies and narrow valleys that sep-
arate the sedimentary ridges, they retain their mountain-stream ap-
pearance, clear and brisk-flowing, quite unlike the sluggish muddy
rivers of the lowlands into which they disembogue.
Despite the slight change in elevation, there appear to be but few
floral differences between lowland and “upland.” The fertile lowland,
now for the most part cleared for cultivation, once supported a dense
jungle growth (Kroeber, 1939, maps 2, 8,5). Recently cut-over areas
in the uplands have come back in low tangled second growth, but
stands of tall virgin jungle remain here and there. The upland fauna,
too, seems fairly typical of the coast plain in general, with deer, tapir,
jaguar, and monkey formerly the common larger forms. The chief
effect of the upland landscape, insofar as it affects human settlement,
would seem to be that the amount of fertile land, the sort repaying
primitive cultivation, is restricted. Consequently, the aboriginal pop-
ulation must have been concentrated in the favored localities. We may
infer, too, that such places would probably be occupied for long periods,
if the region was inhabited at all. A village could not straggle along
indefinitely, following the new clearings as old milpas became ex-
hausted. The natives would have to stay in the same place, or move
clear out to another valley. Thus, given a sizable population, condi-
tions seem favorable for the formation of deep archeological deposits.
That there was a dense population in the region is attested by the many
sites. Within a 10- or 12-mile radius of Tres Zapotes there are eight
other known sites, most of which have mound groups whose construc-
tion obviously involved a great number of man-hours of labor.
The site of Tres Zapotes itself extends more than 2 miles along the
floor and adjacent slopes of the narrow valley of the Arroyo Hueyapan
above the modern village of Tres Zapotes (see fig. 2). The valley
1 The climate is of the “Tropical” (as opposed to ‘‘Equatorial’’) type, with one wet season,
June to December, and a dry season, January to May.
2 According to Friedlander, this substructure is of Miocene origin (Friedlander and
Sonder, 1924, p. 165).
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 9
plain, at its widest less than a mile across, is a nearly level alluvial
formation through which the arroyo has cut a narrow steep-banked
channel. The abrupt banks of its bed and absence of meanders give
the stream a quite recent appearance. Flanking the plain on either
side are the much eroded remnants of once extensive sandstone blocks
whose tops rise perhaps 40 to 50 feet above the present plain. That
\
10 °
GROUPo eit
I
2)
Pi sl TO 72
TRAIN ZO ZEAC4 Oy 4
—
FIGuRH 2.—Map of the Tres Zapotes archeological site.
on the west is in the form of a small plateau rising in two or, in some
places, three terraces. It has a general northeastward trend, closing in
on the arroyo at the upper end. There are two main tables: One a
little less than a mile long and a half mile wide, with numerous spurs
and ridges along its southeastern face; the other, a small irregularly
shaped mesa at the northeastern end of the plateau. The sandstone of
which the plateau is constructed outcrops at numerous points along
516040—44_-2
10 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 138
the edges of the terraces. At one place a little more than halfway to
the upper end the sheer face of a ridge running out from the main
body suggests faulting. Elsewhere, however, there are no sheer faces -
or abrupt angles. The worn rounded edges of the plateau, the shallow
gullies that have cut back into its rim to leave a series of fingerlike
ridges extending into the plain, point to erosion as the chief factor in
modeling the present landscape. A thick layer of clay caps the sand-
stone. On the main body of the pleateau, the clay is a bright butter
yellow with occasional streaks of fine angular red-brown gravel. This
clay may be metamorphosed volcanic ash. The upper few inches of
the clay are gray to black in color, apparently owing to the intrusion
of humus materials. On the northeastern outlier of the plateau the
soil is likewise clay but of a bright brick-red color. Whether the two
clays are of different origin has not been determined. Adjacent ridges
to the north also are covered with red clay.
It is along the southeastern slopes of this plateau, the plain at their
foot, and on the northeastern outlier, that the greater part of the
archeologic remains are found. There are a few mounds and occupa-
tional deposits on the east side of the arroyo, but not nearly so many
as on the west. The eastern rim of the plain is formed by a system of
spurs and ridges that swing through a wide arc from behind the village
to a point nearly opposite the northeast end of the western plateau. At
this point the arc is intersected by a series of bluffs with nearly vertical
northwestern faces, whose tops dip steeply to the southeast. Their
appearance suggests a fault line which must run diagonally across
the valley, connecting with the previously mentioned block on the west
side. Not far downstream from this supposed fault a basalt dike has
been exposed in the arroyo bed. This is the only such formation in the
vicinity. Whether it bears any relation to the fault formation is not
known. To the south, just beyond the north end of Tres Zapotes
village, there is a “laguna,” really a basin that fills in the wet season.
A U-shaped sandstone reef, covered with sherds and some traces of
refuse, closes the southern end of the “lake.”
Earth mounds, carved stone monuments, and refuse deposits com-
pose the archeological remains at Tres Zapotes. The mounds are
arranged in irregular groups for the most part, but there are also
a fair number of small mounds which do not appear to be situated
with reference to any group. It should be made clear at the outset
that none of the assemblages of mounds that we designate as “groups”
were laid out on a precise geometric plan. The units are straggled
about at unequal distances, although in several cases they appear
to have been meant to outline a rather lopsided court. There is no
indication of attempts at orientation. One very definite mound-
group pattern does appear, however, and is made significant by its
recurrence at other sites in this region. This custom consisted in
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO TH
building a relatively high steep mound, often circular but sometimes
four-sided in plan, adjacent to a long narrow mound. Smaller
mounds, usually rather low domes, were built as flankers, often in
pairs, to complete the group.
The Tres Zapotes mounds are not large compared to the pyramids
of the classic Maya area, but some of them are of moderate size. The
two highest are in the neighborhood of 40 feet at their crests, and
something over 150 feet along their baselines (both are square in
plan). The most imposing of the long mounds is 425 feet long by
57 feet wide, and 25 feet high. At the other extreme are the small
mounds barely 6 to 8 feet high and 40 to 50 feet across. None of
the mounds were stone faced, nor are there remains of any major
stone structures, aside from a few small areas flagged with slabs or
blocks of sandstone, a small stone platform, and two small
stairways found in the 1939 season which had sandstone-paved treads.
It is interesting to note that in but one case is there anything re-
sembling a borrow-pit near a mound. Such depressions might have
been filled with alluvium, yet one would expect to see some traces of
them even after a long period of time.
STONE MONUMENTS
The stone monuments of Tres Zapotes occur singly and are widely
scattered over the large site. Most of them are carved from basalt, a
rock which is abundant in the region, especially around the base of
nearby Tuxtla Mountain. All of the monuments have suffered inten-
tional mutilation in greater or less degree, suggesting the work of
an invading people. Likewise, it is probable that many of them had
been moved from their original locations. Exceptions are Stela A,
which probably retains its approximate original location in front
of a large mound, the Colossal Head which still stands on a crude
foundation of rocks, and, of course, Monument E, the large numeral
in the arroyo bed, carved from the living rock. Because of their
condition and location and because of the art style employed, it is
the writer’s impression that most if not all of the larger monuments
belong to the early middle period of occupation of the site. The
stone columns which are found at various places on the site are
possibly of later date. For the sake of convenient reference, all of
the larger worked stones, with the exception of the stelae, have been
classified as monuments regardless of their nature. These include
human and animal figures, stone boxes, altars, basins, and the carvings
found in the arroyo.
STELA A
This large and interesting monument was discovered lying on its
back, at the southern base of Mound L, Group 2. Formerly it had
12
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
Fieurn 3.—Stela A. Tres Zapotes.
[BULL, 138
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 13
stood with the carved surface facing toward the west. It had fallen
on its back, with the result that the decorated face was very badly
eroded and mutilated (pl. 12 and fig. 3). In common with practi-
cally all of the monuments at Tres Zapotes, it had evidently been
intentionally broken. A large section from the middle of the south
side of the stela had been broken off and carried away. The upper
portion is carved in the form of a giant mask panel, which is some-
what reminiscent of that on the face of Stela C and which is best
described by reference to the illustration (fig. 3). Below this mask
panel is a curving and projecting ledge, and at the lower portion
of the monument is another similar projecting ledge. In the
middle of the flat area lying between those two projections
is carved a human figure in almost full relief. Unfortunately, it is
badly mutilated and weathered. The head is missing, having been
located at the position where the stela had broken in two. The
smooth area on either side of this central figure had been covered
with elaborate carving in low relief, most of which has now
weathered to such an extent as to be indistinguishable. However, the
central motives consist of a standing figure, on either side, facing
toward the central figure. One of these figures is apparently hold-
ing a human head suspended, while the other grasps a small baton-
like object. Al three figures are standing on the lower ledge. The
central figure is in full face, while the other two are shown in profile.
The two sides of the monument were also formerly covered by carv-
ings, the majority of which have been mutilated to such an extent
as now to be unrecognizable. However, the figure of a crouching
jaguar and portions of two reclining human figures are still quite
well preserved (pl. 12, 6). The back of the monument is perfectly
smooth and scored here and there with longitudinal striations. Dur-
ing the course of excavation, it was discovered that thousands of
obsidian flakes and prismatic blades had been packed all around the
edges of the monument after it had fallen, particularly around the
upper end, where probably 2 bushels were removed. Four figurine
heads of early type were found at the foot, and also the solid
effigy head of a king vulture. Although a large excavation was made
around the base, no sign of a foundation was discovered. The
dimensions of Stela A are as follows:
MenethvoL lower fragments+= 2-222 aoe ee ee 8 feet 3 inches.
enrth? of uppers fragmento 2223 be ae 9 feet 4 inches.
Depth of ledge on which the figures stand___________________ 1 foot 1 inch.
Widthtot stelaiat basciof foures! = 6.3 Soe ae ee 6 feet 9 inches.
PEHIGKNCSSOLADASC= see wes eee See se 8 feet 4 inches.
Mhicknessiofmnatrsuriace 2S jth ee ee 1 foot 6 inches.
PROtaL en phy seats oe Pe Se a ee a en age ye feet Tt Inches,
14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bunt 138
The material from which this stela is carved is different from any
of the other monuments at Tres Zapotes, being a volcanic breccia.
STELA B
Lying about 25 yards southeast of the base of Mound C, Group 3,
is a stela 5 feet long by approximately 3 feet in width (pl. 7, 5).
It consists of a slab of olivine basalt about 10 inches in thickness.
This is the same material as Stela C. The base has been squared
off and the top rounded by chipping away the edges of the stone.
Both surfaces of the stela are smooth and flat. During the process
of excavating this slab, it was discovered that the base had rested
upon a foundation of unworked stones.
STELA C
This fragment is the most interesting monument at Tres Zapotes
because it has carved upon it a bar and dot Initial Series date. It was
the only monument at the site accompanied by an altar. It has been
made the subject of a special paper by the writer (Stirling, 1940 a) and
so will not be described here. The stela is now in the National
Museum in Mexico City.
STELA D
About a mile and a half in a northeasterly direction from Group 1,
lies Mound Group 4. This consists of five rather small mounds,
grouped around a plaza. In the middle of this plaza hes Stela D.
It is carved from basalt and is in a generally good state of preserva-
tion, although it has been mutilated at a few points. In its entirety
the Stela represents the head and open mouth of a grotesque animal,
probably a jaguar. On the flat surface, constituting the back of the
mouth, are carved three human figures in low relief. The two right-
hand figures are standing, each with the right foot slightly in advance
of the left. On the left side, a third figure is kneeling, facing them.
The central figure is shorter than the other two and is wearing a skirt,
which hangs to the knees and is fastened by a sash around the waist.
The figure standing on the right has the right elbow bent and is carry-
ing a long staff in the right hand. The left arm hangs by the side,
the hand holding a small decorated rectangular object with a circular
handle. Armlets are worn on the upper arm and a broad necklace
hangs over the neck. All three wear elaborate headdresses and behind
each figure is a large circular object. The scene depicted is a peaceful
one. The central figure appears to be a woman. Over these figures
and under the projecting lip of the monster is shown what looks like a
pot-bellied gnomelike figure, placed horizontally, facing downward,
and carved in higher relief than the three human figures. The cheeks
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 15
of the animal are decorated with a series of curious conventional
designs, both on the front and sides, and the front surface of the
lower lip likewise has a somewhat mutilated conventional design
(pl. 14 and fig. 4). The back of the monument is smooth and undeco-
rated. The workmanship on this stela is of a high order. The figures
by
3
3
16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buux. 138
show an appreciation of perspective, are well modeled, and are free
from stiffness. Together with Monument C and the Colossal Head,
Stela D constitutes one of the most interesting art objects from Tres
Zapotes. Weyerstall calls this Monument 4. The dimensions of
Stela D are as follows:
Inches
let oh Gs es a ae ee ee eee ee ee 58
1. 0 a aR a Np PL AN he Se APU eT 39
Thicknessiat mid@les.o ee See Pe a ae se ee 14
Height ‘of:open mouth. 222322 2s ee ee a ae ee ee 33
Projection: of lower ledge. 25 sa ee ee 9
STELA E
On the east side of the arroyo, in a position about midway between
Groups 2 and 3, a high narrow promontory abuts on the arroyo. On
the flat area at the top of this promontory is a small mound. Lying
near the western foot of this mound was a well-worked slab of basalt,
constituting a portion of a Stela. It is possible that this fragment was
the lower portion of the monument intended to be set in the ground,
as it is broken off just at the point where the decorative carving on
the stone began. On each side a portion of this carved surface remains
(pl. 7,¢). The slab is about 4 feet long by 2 feet wide, and is 10 inches
in thickness.
MONUMENT A
The most striking single object at Tres Zapotes is the Colossal Head
(pl. 4). This remarkable sculpture is one of the major art objects
of the New World. It is carved from a block of gray basalt and is
exceptional for the realism of its treatment. At first impression the
features seem quite negroid in appearance, but in general the head may
be considered to represent an unusually fine example of the broad-
nosed, short-faced figures, evidently an early type, that are found over
a considerable area in Middle America. The ears are conventional in
treatment, in contrast to the face. The back of the head is flat and
marked with a number of vertical striations which may indicate hair.
A band is shown around the forehead and the figure appears to be
wearing a close-fitting headdress. The objects projecting on either
cheek apparently represent ear ornaments worn through the lobes of
the ears.
There is an outcropping of basalt in the bed of the arroyo about a
mile distant from Group 1. A large rectangular block has apparently
been quarried out at this place, and it may have been from this that
the head was carved. Otherwise it would appear that this great stone,
weighing more than 10 tons, must have been moved a distance of
approximately 10 miles from the vicinity of Lirios, where a number of
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO Li
large blocks of basalt identical in appearance lie upon the surface of
the ground.
Upon completing the excavation of the Colossal Head, it was dis-
covered that it had been placed upon a foundation consisting of a layer
of unworked stones at the ancient plaza level, indicating that the head
had been buried by a process of accumulation of earth and not as a
result of sinking. The head is placed in front of the south mound of
Group 1, and faces north. The tip of the nose and the left eye have
been mutilated. On the top of the head are some superficial cracks
which were probably caused by repeated exposure to fires made in
burning grass or clearing land for milpas.
The first mention of the Tres Zapotes site in print came about as a
result of the discovery of this monument. Writing in January 1871,
Melgar said:
It was in 1862 when I made several trips in the region of San Andrés Tuxtla
in the State of Veracruz in Mexico that I heard of a colossal head which had
been unearthed a few years before in the following manner. About a league
and a half from a sugar plantation (Hueyapan) on a shoulder of the San Martin
Mountains, while making a clearing for a milpa, a workman told of having
found projecting above the ground what seemed to be the bottom of a huge
inverted iron kettle. He notified the owner of the plantation who ordered its
excavation, when in place of a kettle the above-mentioned head was found. It
remains inside the hole made in exposing it because being made, in my opinion,
from granite and being two yards in height with the other proportions corre-
sponding, although they attempted to move it, they found it impossible to do so.
Thus the situation remained. The discovery was mentioned but nothing was
done about it. As I have already mentioned, on one of my trips in search of
antiquities I arrived at this same plantation and requested the owner to guide
me to the head. We went to it and on seeing it I was amazed. As a work of
art it is without exaggeration a magnificent sculpture as may be judged by the
photograph which accompanies this." But what amazed me most was the
Ethiopian type which it represented. [Melgar, 1871.]
The remainder of Melgar’s article consists of an attempt to prove
the former existence of a Negro population in Middle America.
MONUMENT B
Two large stone boxes were unearthed during the course of exca-
vations. One of these (Monument B) was found close to the arroyo
on an artificially elevated area lying to the east of the Burnt Mounds
(pl. 7,a). All four sides of the box had been broken in such a manner
that none of the upper edge remained. The box had been carved from
a massive block of basalt and had a very heavy bottom in proportion
to the sides, which were of unequal thickness. Judging from the
? There is no photograph accompanying the article, but an engraving shows among other
stone archeological specimens standing on a table, a miniature model of the Colossal Head
which seems fairly accurately done.
18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLy. 138
manner in which the inner and outer surfaces were finished, the box
had apparently been completed when broken. There is no decorative |
carving whatever on the portion which remains. The box is generally |
rectangular in shape, with slightly outward flaring sides. The outside |
cornefs are rounded, so as to give it somewhat of a “bathtub” shape.
The inside bottom is rectangular and perfectly flat. The height can-
not be determined but the other dimensions are as follows:
Botton length outsides’. 2-24 = ee a ee eee 4 feet 1 inch.
Borton!, width; -outsidese ss ele. ee ae ee ee 2 feet 3 inches.
Bottom! lengthy AmSid ess os eck cn eee he SE 2 ee ee 3 feet 8 inches.
Bottom: width; insides 222 = Cus 2 es a eee ee 23 inches.
Qutside lengths (approximate) oo) 2. ee ee eee ee 5 feet.
BOtLOMULMICKNeS Sse 2 eu me al ee ee Se 16 inches.
One end is completely miss:ng and one side almost so. None of the
missing fragments were encountered.
MONUMENT C
The second stone box (Monument C) was found in Group 2, lying
just south of Mound C. This box was seen by the Selers in 1908, and
had become reburied, excepting for a few inches of the highest portions
of one end and one side. Weyerstall refers to it as Monument 5. It is
approximately the same size and shape as Monument B, but differs from
it in that the entire outer surface, excepting for the bottom, is covered
with elaborate, carved decorations in low relief. Like Monument B,
it is made from a single block of basalt, and is broken so that the upper
edges are all missing. One side is almost completely gone. The
major portion of the other side and the two ends still remain, and the
carvings which decorate them are in very good condition. These
carvings make Monument C one of the most striking objects recov-
ered at Tres Zapotes.
Side A.—The principal features of the carvings consist of a number
of figures of men, or deities, apparently engaged in combat, amidst
an elaborate series of scroll-like designs. The writer does not feel
competent to attempt an interpretation of these carvings, but the
scrolls along the bottom of the two long sides appear to represent
water, and, from what remains of the principal side, it is possible
that the upper edge was decorated with a corresponding sky-band,
as the upper central feature displays a grotesque face, which may
represent the sun, or asky god. From the center of the conventional-
ized mouth projects a curling forked tongue and a 3-pointed figure,
with each point terminating in a dot. From each side of the mouth
there depends half of a broad bifurcated tongue, each end of which
terminates in a figure which may represent an outward-facing plumed
serpent head in profile, with four fangs curling from the fore part
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 19
of the mouth, and an elongated tongue depending from the back of
the mouth. If these are correctly identified, the scrolls, which con-
stitute a major portion of the design on all four sides of the box, may
represent the coils of plumed serpents. Outside of each serpent head
is an inverted human figure. These two figures face toward each
other. Each wears an elaborate headdress. The first figure has on a
helmet in the form of an animal head, from which projects a curious
spade-shaped ornament. His left arm is flexed across the breast,
holding in place a straight rod, which passes under a rectangular
object which may be an ornament depending from the headdress.
The right arm is upraised and the hand grasps the handle of a round-
headed club or mace. The knees are flexed in a position indicating
action. The other figure is shown in a similar posture, the lower
portion of the legs being broken off. One arm is flexed across the
breast, holding some unidentified object, while the other arm is
upraised, the hand grasping the middle of a slender staff, which is
pointed at each end. The facial features are somewhat coarser than
those of the first figure. The headdress is less clearly defined, that
portion of the box having been worn almost smooth. A curious con-
cave ornament hangs from the headdress in the position of a pendant
ear ornament (pls. 5, 17, a).
Side B.—The remaining portion of side B (pl. 17, 6) shows that the
design on this side must have been similar in composition to side A. In
one corner can be clearly seen the facial profile and headdress of a man
with upraised arm and hand, grasping a rod similar to that held by
the second figure, side A. The “water” scroll along the bottom is intact
and in the other corner can be seen a spade-shaped headdress ornament
like that worn by the first figure, side A, and a hand grasping a rod or a
club handle. 'The small portion remaining of this side is very well
preserved.
Side C.—On this end of the box is carved a central figure kneeling
within the arch of a large scroll. The left arm, slightly flexed, extends
backward, the hand grasping a long spearlike object which points
forward and upward. The right elbow is bent, the right hand rest-
ing on the upraised knee. This figure wears a headdress terminating
in the same spade-shaped ornament shown on the first figure, side A.
The face is looking upward, toward a figure in the upper left-hand cor-
ner of the design. This figure is shown from the waist up, the lower
portion of the body being concealed by a large scroll. He is wearing
a curious nose ornament and his gaze is directed downward at the first
figure. The left arm is flexed across the breast, the right elbow bent,
and forearm upraised. Both hands grasp a long spearlike object,
the lower point of which apparently touches the right knee of the first
figure. In the upper right-hand corner is shown the upper part cf an-
20 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 138 |
other human figure, also with gaze directed downward at the first figure.
The right arm is raised upward, as though lifting his animal headdress.
Under his flexed left arm he holds a good-sized rectangular object.
This figure appears to have a pointed beard and the ear is quite
realistically depicted (pl. 18, a).
Side D.—This side is decorated with a large triple scroll similar
to that on the opposite end of the box. Within the central loop is
a figure in human form, grasping a slender staff. The face, in profile,
is looking backward over the left shoulder. This face, the best
preserved of the eight human faces which appear on the box, is
strongly Mayoid in character and resembles the “Roman Nose” God
so frequently depicted in Maya art. He is wearing an ornate head-
dress, which is surmounted by a bird head over the forehead.
The wrists and forearms are decorated with bracelets. Apparently
a necklace is shown on the chest, with a concave pendant object
similar to that worn by the second figure, side A. In the upper left-
hand corner is shown the upper portion of another figure, with one arm
upraised, the other reaching forward, the hand touching the point
of the staff carried by the first figure. In front of this figure is a large
rectangular object, possibly a shield, grasped by the left hand. The
portion of the box on which the features of this personage were
carved has been worn quite smooth, but the outline of the profile is
still fairly clear, showing either a projecting chin or a beard. The
upper right-hand corner of this end of the box is missing. It is
probable that this contained a third figure, analogous to those shown
on the three remaining end corners. (PI. 18, 0.)
In its entirety, this box constitutes a magnificent art object. The
complex design is beautifully balanced and, although very intricate,
it is executed with fine taste and feeling. The scrolls are modified
just enough from geometric exactness to produce a sweeping grace-
ful effect. The position of the figures is easy and graceful. The
composition indicates deep imagination and symbolic thought. As
an object of art, it is thoroughly sophisticated, and represents the
work of a master craftsman. The dimensions of the box are as
follows:
Bottom Lem eth mts Cee oe I ee ge ee anata 4 feet.
Bottom lengthy insides 22 est) ee eee eels Ea ee 3 feet 3 inches.
Maximum top lensth outsides) 3 ee eee 5 feet.
Bottom width, inside-___.____-__ tel i Doel Balle pa oko taal 2 feet 2 inches.
Topywidth, outside (approximate). — 2) =a se ee 3 feet 2 inches.
SOULOM ,LNEGKMESS 2 tire ee ee 2a ee eee 12 inches.
“THICKNESS OL iSUGES ee ee eee ORE SiN al ee eee eee 6 inches to 8 inches.
The ends are somewhat thicker than the sides.
|
|
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 21
It is impossible to estimate exactly the height of the box, because
no portion of the upper edge remains. At present the greatest re-
maining outside height is 29 inches.
This monument is now in the National Museum in Mexico.
MONUMENT D
About 10 feet south of Monument B was excavated a barrel-shaped
stone, 2 feet 10 inches in height, carved from basalt. The bottom
is flat and the top contains a circular basinlike depression about 3
inches deep, with a rim 3% inches wide. Most of the rim had been
battered off, but about 12 inches of the top surface is intact. It is
possible that this stone served as a receptacle for offerings but it
seems more likely that it was a sacrificial stone, as it would be of the
correct dimensions for this purpose, and the basinlike bowl on the
top would serve for collecting blood. Since the analogous carved
stone boxes of the Mexican Plateau area were known to have been for
the purpose of storing sacrificial blood, the existence of this stone in
definite relationship to one of these boxes lends support to the idea
that the Tres Zapotes stone boxes also were intended for this purpose
1plAt0; 6).
FIGURE 5.—Monument HE. Numerical inscription carved on base rock on the bed of the
arroyo. Tres Zapotes.
MONUMENT E
Just east of the Burnt Mounds the arroyo cuts through a massive
rock formation. » Carved from the living stone on the bed of the
arroyo, and 3 to 4 feet under the surface of the stream at low water,
is a rectangular slab, approximately 6 feet long and 5 feet wide, that
projects 10 inches above the bedrock. On this is carved in relief, 2%
inches high, a dot and two bars, as shown in figure 5.
22 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 138 |
This interesting numerical inscription apparently was carved at a |
time when the bed of the arroyo was in another position. Its loca-
tion seems to equate it without much doubt to the deeply buried |
habitation level covered with a layer of consolidated volcanic ash.
Trench 26, where the principal stratigraphic excavation was made
penetrating this early level, was almost directly opposite this carving.
The physical evidence connecting the numeral with this earliest
ceramic horizon has been discussed in some detail by Drucker in his
report on Tres Zapotes ceramics (Drucker, Bull. 140, in press). This
is an important point because it demonstrates the use of bar and dot
numerals at the site during its earliest period of occupancy. This in-
creases the probability that Stela C likewise belongs to this period,
and makes the contemporaneity of its late Baktun 7 date more
probable.
MONUMENT F
This is one of two large grotesque figures in the form of a head
with shoulders and flexed arms, and with a long flat tenonlike pro-
jection instead of a body. It is possible that these stones may have
constituted decorative details at an entrance or the base of a stair-
way, being anchored by means of the tenons. However, the latter
are smooth and well finished, and it seems more likely that they were
utilized as seats or altars. Monument F has a depression on the top
of the head, which may have served to receive offerings (pl. 8, a).
This striking and powerfully modeled stone formerly lay in the
flat area west of Mound M, Group 2, about 50 yards from the mound.
In 1937 the natives of Tres Zapotes decided to move the stone to the
village. By means of a large number of oxen they dragged it across
the arroyo, but were unable to ascend the steep south bank. It was
abandoned on the bed of the arroyo where it now reposes, covered by
water in the wet season. This figure was seen by Weyerstall before
its removal and was illustrated by him. He refers to it as Monu-
ment 2. The stone is 8 feet 3 inches long and 3 feet 1 inch wide at
the shoulders.
MONUMENT G
This monument, belonging to the same class as Monument F, was
found lying on its side between Mounds B and C of Group 2. It
was partly up the west slope of Mound B but near the base, a posi-
tion which indicated that formerly it may have been placed on top
of this small mound. The features are so badly “defaced that the
face cannot be reconstructed. This is referred to by Weyerstall as
Monument 38. It is 6 feet 11 inches long, 3 feet 3 inches wide at the
shoulders, and 3 feet 10 inches high at the head (pl. 8, 0).
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 23
MONUMENT H
Near the base of the southernmost mound of the Burnt Mounds
Group was found the image of an owl, carved in gray basalt. This
figure resembles in technique the so-called Olmec or “baby-face” fig-
urines found in Veracruz and other parts of Mexico. The eyes are
oval in shape and slant upward from the base of the beak. The ears
are indicated in a long, narrow, rectangular fashion. The front of
the body consists of a double concavity, while the back of the image
is flat. The lower portion, which may have included the feet, has
been broken away. The remaining portion of the stone is 29 inches
in height and 17 inches in width (pl. 10, c).
MONUMENTS I, J, AND K
The lower portions of two seated figures, carved in basalt, were
found. These bear a striking resemblance to the torsos of certain
solid pottery figurines from the excavations. One of these, Monu-
ment I, lay in a cornfield near the base of a mound about 400 yards
west of Group 8. This had been broken into two pieces, which fitted
together perfectly. It evidently represented a male figure wearing a
breechcloth. On the side of each thigh is a small raised carving, which
appears to have represented the ends of a headdress hanging down the
side. The back of the stone is hollowed out in the form of a circular
basinlike depression (pl. 9, a, 6).
In excavating a small low mound in the great plaza just to the west of
Mound A, Group 1, at a depth of about 4 feet another somewhat simi-
lar figure, Monument J, was unearthed. This, however, appeared to
have been flat on the back, and the lap constituted a basinlike depres-
sion. The arms extended straight forward, the hands resting on the
knees. The crossed legs of the figure were not actually indicated, as
in that previously described. This image had been painted red, and
considerable sections of the red paint still adhered to the stone when
it was discovered. The fragment measures 16 inches in height, 16
inches from front to back, and 181% inches across (pl. 9, c).
On the surface of this same low mound was found another frag-
ment, Monument K, consisting of the head and shoulders of a stone
figure. Although the shoulders and the back are well modeled, no
features whatever are indicated on the head. Whether or not this
represents an unfinished carving, or whether it was intentionally made
in this form, it is impossible to say. The entire bust measures 17
inches in height and 17 inches in width. The head is 8 inches in width
and 14 inches high. The projection of the lower part of the face
is about 5 inches (pl. 9, ¢).
24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY - [BULL. 138
MONUMENT L
Near the top of one of the mounds in the Burnt Mounds Group,
one of the workmen noticed a projecting piece of stone, which upon
excavation turned out to be the representation of a dwarflike pot-
bellied human figure with bent elbows and hands placed over the
stomach. The surface of the stone is considerably eroded but the
general outlines of the figure are pretty much unaltered. The back
is somewhat flat, and it stands upon a circular base, which is also flat.
The material is gray basalt. The image is 26 inches in height, 18
inches across the flat portion of the back, and the head is 11 inches
in diameter (pl. 11, a).
MONUMENTS M AND N
A little more than a half mile above Group 3 on the west bank of |
the Arroyo Hueyapan is a good-sized mound about 40 yards from the |
arroyo bank. On the level ground between this mound and the arroyo |
were two stone objects. Monument M is a seated figure, somewhat
reminiscent in style of that from La Venta which is now in the town
of Villa Hermosa (Blom, 1926, figs. 79, 80). The features, although
somewhat eroded, are of modified “baby-face” style. The head is
rather long and flat. It is about 4 feet high. ‘The arms and legs were
broken off, presumably in ancient times. During the interval between
our two seasons of work at Tres Zapotes, one of the natives dragged it
by means of oxen to the edge of the village, where the head broke off
and where the figure now hes (pl. 11, d-d).
The second monument from this location, Monument N (pl. 10, a)
is a cylindrical stone basin or offertory, 19 inches high, 22 inches in
diameter, with a basin 4 inches deep and 138 inches in diameter. The
bottom is smooth and slightly concave. This stone basin is quite |
similar to Monument D, although it is smaller.
MONUMENTS O AND P
At a point almost half a mile northeast of the Long Mound, the
arroyo cuts through a mass of basalt in the bottom of the gorge. The
water has carved a narrow trough through the solid stone at this point,
about 8 or 10 feet deep. On the top of the east bank of the arroyo here,
is asmall mound which has been partially cross-sectioned by the arroyo.
Below the mound and lying on the bottom of the stone trough are
several large stones, including two peculiar carved objects, just alike
excepting for their size (fig. 6). At the lowest water, they are about |
5 or 6 feet below the surface of the swift-running stream, and it is
necessary to dive under in order to examine them carefully. They are
U-shaped pieces of basalt, but with arms of unequal length. The lower |
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 25
part of the curve is filled with a stone “web,” and to the longer arm,
as part of the monolithic carving, is attached a short cylindrical piece.
One of these stones is about 5 feet in length from the base of the curve
to the tip of the longest arm; the other is about a foot shorter.
SECTION A-A A
Ficurn 6.—Monument O. One of two similar stone carvings on the bed of the arroyo.
Tres Zapotes.
ROUND COLUMNS
At various points throughout the archeological zone, cylindrical
columns and column fragments were found. In two places these were
in situ. Mound E, Group 3, has on its southern front two rows of very
large boulders, which lead from the base to the top. Each of these
rows terminates with a column on the exact summit of the mound.
On the southern side of Mound D, Group 3, were three round
columns, two of which are still standing in a vertical position. Some
of these columns are crudely finished but in a few instances they are
well worked. None of them are ornamented in any manner by decora-
tive carvings. Most of them appear to have been made from columnar
basalt (pl. 15, ¢).
STONE PLATFORM
Excavation of a small mound lying just east of the Long Mound
revealed that it covered a rectangular platform made of earth and
faced with stone masonry. This platform measured 24 feet in length
by 18 feet in width, and was 3 feet 10 inches in height. On the west
side of the platform an abutment was constructed, up which a flight of
four steps led to the top of the platform. These stairs, constructed of
flat slabs of sandstone, were 6 feet in width and about 8 inches in depth.
They were constructed in such a manner that each slab overlapped
the succeeding one, covering half of the step below, thus making a very
firm, locked stairway. In laying the sandstone slabs with which the
516040—443
|
26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Burt. 138.
platform was faced on all four sides, the ancient masons were appar- |
ently careful to break the joints so as to strengthen the wall. No lime
was used to bind the stones (pl. 18, 0). |
STONE STAIRWAY
In completing a cross section of Mound A, Group 1, a stairway con- |
sisting of five steps, composed of flat sandstone flagstones set in clay, |
was encountered. These five steps are curved so as to form part of the
segment of a circle, and lead to the top of a primary mound which
was constructed of heavy red clay and was flat on top. Each step is |
about 30 feet in length. The construction of this stairway is much
more primitive in nature than that on the platform above described.
In this case no true masonry is employed and the stones do not overlap
(pl. 15, a).
STONE FiRE PIT
In almost the center of Mound F on the Ranchito terrace was a large
circular fireplace, walled in by stones set up on edge so as to make an
enclosure 5 feet in diameter and 2 feet deep. It was almost filled with
-burned earth, sherds, figurine fragments, and pieces of broken manos
and metates (pl. 15, d).
LA PUENTE
About 1 hour’s ride north of Hueyapan is a mound group at a place
known as La Puente on the Hacienda San Pedro de Aguirrez. It is
located on a small stream called Arroyo la Puente. The group consists
of a large double mound about 50 feet high, with two smaller long
mounds flanking it to the west. At a somewhat greater distance to
the west is a high pyramidal mound. In the middle of the little court
formed by the flanker mounds is a stone monument. When we found
this it was almost completely buried. On excavation it proved to be
a piece of basalt carved in the form of an arm, with bent elbow and
closed fist (pl. 18, a.) There is an ornament around the wrist and
another around the upper arm. It is not a fragment but was made
complete in this form. One side is well finished, the other rounded
off and smooth, showing that the stone was intended to lie flat. It is
44 inches long, 31 inches wide, and the diameter of the arm at the
shoulder is 16 inches.
TLAPACOYA
From the nearby village of Tlapacoya Arriba, at the foot of Tuxtla
Mountain, came one day a native carrying on his saddle the not incon-
siderable burden of a stone jaguar. The head and forequarters are
quite well carved, but the hind quarters taper off into a postlike pro- —
* SriRIING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 27
_jection, as though the figure were to be set up vertically in the ground
' (pl. 15, 6.) This is the only stone carving we heard of in this vicinity.
SAN MARCOS
Near the small town of San Marcos, which lies about 4 hours’ ride
In a southeasterly direction from Tres Zapotes, we conducted excava-
tions for about a week. At this site there are only a few very small
mounds and some small but rich sherd deposits. In the course of
excavations, a crude head of basalt (pl. 16, ¢) was encountered. This
head differs considerably in appearance from any other sculpture we
have seen in the region.
THE ARROYO SAN JUAN AND THE RIO TECOLAPAN
On March 24 (1939) we left on horseback for an exploratory trip
through the region lying between Tres Zapotes and Alvarado. We
rode first to La Providencia, near San Juan de los Reyes. Here there
is a group of mounds near the Arroyo San Juan. They are on the
south bank of the stream, about 400 yards from the arroyo. The
group consists of a steep, conical mound and, very close to this, in a
northwesterly direction, a larger, lower, flat-topped mound. These
mounds are about 25 feet and 20 feet in height, respectively. Close by,
in an easterly direction, are two other low and rather formless mounds.
Our guide said that 3 years ago a considerable number of hollow fig-
urines, averaging about 10 inches in height, were found at the north-
west base of the steep mound on the side facing the flat-topped mound.
About a mile and a half south of this group, and lying east of the
trail between San Pablo and La Providencia, can be seen another long
mound. From La Providencia we rode down the Arroyo San Juan to
Suchapa, where there are some small mounds, and where we saw a
hollow head from a frog figurine. We left our horses at Suchapa
and took a canoe down the San Juan to Macuile, where the San Juan
enters the San Augustine River. Here we took a launch headed in
the direction of Salto Barranca. About a mile below Macuile, on the
west bank of the river, lies a group of mounds, two of which are quite
large. One mound is cross-sectioned by the river, but the bank was
largely overgrown. At El Paso a railroad bridge for a narrow-gage
sugar line crosses the river. Here we disembarked and walked up
the tracks to Salto Barranca, where we spent the night. The next
morning we rode 2 miles southeast of town, where there is a group
of 25 or 80 mounds, several being very large. These are on the north
bank of the Rio Tecolapan, the largest tributary from the Tuxtla
Mountains north of the Rio Tuxtla. At the south foot of the largest
mound is a large fragment of columnar basalt. The story is told
28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY iBULL. 138
that it was broken from the top of a long stela 40 years ago, which
stood mostly buried near the top of the mound. At that time it was
said to have been excavated and the lower part carved with figures.
Before the bottom of the pillar was reached, the excavation caved in
and the lower part was reburied. One old man is said to know the
exact location. I am inclined to doubt that any stone monument
was ever placed on top of a mound in this area.
Riding up the river a mile or two, we came to another less impressive
mound group on the south bank of the Rio Tecolapan. Here, all the
natives agree, three worked stones had been visible in the flat but they
became covered 50 years ago as a result of the silt deposited by occa-
sional inundations. One old man is said to know just where they are
buried, but he was in Lerdo when we visited the place. He lives on
the site at present. The woman living there said she remembered the
excavation of the column at the other site and the fact that the stone
had decorations. Many figurines were described to us as found at
these two sites, one life-sized head having been found less than a year
ago at the south bank site. All of them had been broken by children
and lost. We visited the place on the river bank where this head had
been exposed by the river. Theriver was abnormally full for this time
of year, but a heavy layer of pottery was visible at the water level about
8 feet under the surface. Among the sherds were fragments of the
upright incensarios of the type which occur so abundantly at Lirios.
Returning to Salto Barranca, we saw one large hollow head of modified
“Totonac” type, also similar to some seen from Lirios. From Salto
Barranca, we rode to Lerdo, which is built on a group of mounds, and
continued to San Francisco, which joins Lerdo, and where there are
more mounds. Here we learned that a year or so ago a stone figure,
about 8 feet high with an elaborate headdress, had been dug up. One
of the Sugar Mill officials was said to have sent it to Mexico. From
San Francisco we took a bus over a rough road to El Meson. About
4 or 5 miles northwest of Meson is a very large and important group
of mounds called Cerro de Gallo. These mounds are now mostly
under cultivation for sugarcane and stand out very distinctly. They
continue all the way to Meson and are the most impressive group we
have seen. They can also be said to be on the north bank of the Tecola-
pan but not very close to the river. We spent the night at Meson.
The next morning we were driven in a truck to another group of
mounds about a mile further up the river on the north bank also.
Here in a little court lies a very interesting fallen monument. It isa
single piece of columnar basalt 12 feet long and 2 feet in diameter at
the base. It tapers slightly toward the upper end. About 2 feet from
the base, a deep groove goes all around the column. Above this groove
is carved a well-preserved figure or glyph which goes across one flat
STIRLING] “STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 29
surface of the column and laps over slightly on the two adjoining
surfaces. Above this is carved a narrow band and on this is carved
in low relief the standing figure of a man, slightly less than life-
size. The head is in profile, the shoulders shown full on, the right
foot in advance of the left. The arms hang by the two sides. The
figure wears an ear plug and headdress. The design probably con-
tinues on the adjoining facet, toward which the figure is facing (pl.
16, a). This column is closely similar to one in the hall of monuments
in the National Museum in Mexico said to have come from near
Alvarado. The stela near Salto Barranca was undoubtedly also of
this type and may even be the same one now in the Museum. Three
other stone fragments, apparently unworked, lie near this column, and
there is said to be also a round stone with a circle carved on it, but
our guide could not find this in the heavy grass. We heard that
beyond La Florida, further up the river, a man has a stone figure about
3 feet high, and that there is a stone with “letters” on the upper trail
between Meson and San Juan.
We left on horseback for Tres Zapotes. About a half hour’s ride on
the trail to San Juan, we crossed the Arroyo de la Sierra, and on the
south side of this stream, at a place called La Sierra, saw an interesting
mound group with at least one very high steep mound newly cleared
fora milpa. Most of the group is under heavy forest. Between this
point and San Juan the trail passes two or three other small mound
groups. Hearing of a stone with “letters” on it, we rode from San
Juan up the arroyo to Saltillo, where there is a very pretty waterfall,
which drops over the edge of an old lava flow. Here I bought from
an old woman a rather ornate small upright Red ware incensario and
a headless “toad god” whistle of San Marcos type. There are several
mounds to be seen near the trail between San Juan and Saltillo, all
rather small. Just across the arroyo from San Juan is a small group
on the right bank.
About a mile and a half beyond Saltillo is a small hill on a natural
ridge. Near the top of this was the inscribed stone. It turned out to be
a natural basalt boulder, roughly spherical in shape, and about 4 feet
in diameter. On it were carved some crude scroll designs (pl. 16, 0).
There appear to be more underneath, as the rock has rolled over.
’ Years ago, according to a native who joined us, someone excavated on
the south side of the hill by the rock and found a number of small
figurines. There are several other boulders on the hill and some large
ones at the foot. All of these are unworked and the natives say this
one stone is the only worked one in the region. Beyond this, about a
half hour’s ride, we went to see a fine crater lake about one-half mile in
diameter. It is called Laguna Colorado, because on some days it is
said to look red in color. It was green when we saw it under a good
|
30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bout. 120|
|
sun. It has no outlet and is said to contain many crocodiles and fish
of one species. It is said to be very deep. There are traces of ab- |
original occupancy all through the foothills, as we frequently saw |
sherds on the ground, but no indication of large sites. |
Near the edge of the town of Lirios is a large basalt boulder with
petroglyphs (fig. 7), and on a high ridge about 2 miles from the town |
is a boulder with the figure of a jaguar (pl. 16, d).
Figurb 7.—Petroglyphs on a large boulder near Lirios.
It is evident that the entire area between the Sap Augustine River
and the base of the mountains was heavily populated in aboriginal |
times, the settlements centering mainly on the arroyos flowing from |
the ee to the river. In almost any spot that one crosses an
arroyo, the bottom will be seen to be littered with sherds. From our
brief survey it would appear that El] Meson was a very important |
center in aboriginal times. |
CONCLUSION
It is unfortunate that it is impossible to relate the stone monuments |
of Tres Zapotes and vicinity in a satisfactory manner to the ceramic |
cultural column so clearly established at the site (Drucker, Bull. 140, |
in press).
However, in at least three instances there is some evidence bearing |
on this relationship. Stela A, although fallen and considerably
damaged, is probably in its original position. Excavations around |
it indicate that it had been set up on an artificial clay platform and
" STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 31
‘had fallen on its back. All of the ceramic materials recovered from
‘the original base level of the stela belong to the late lower or early
‘middle Tres Zapotes horizons. Monument A, the Colossal Head, is
also prebably in its original position. The ceramics in the ground
‘immediately surrounding the head are not significant owing to the
‘fact that the head had been excavated previously. However, if we
may relate the head to the mounds of Group 1 surrounding the quad-
rangle in which it stands, we again find the early ceramic horizon
represented. From the cross-section trench through the east mound
of Group 1 were recovered only solid figurines of lower Tres Zapotes
type and early pottery including quantities of Incised Black ware.
The relationship of Monument N to the earliest Tres Zapotes
horizon has already been discussed.
The limited archeologic evidence all points toward a relatively
early period for the larger stone monument. It appears likely that
all of the major stones were carved before the beginning of upper
Tres Zapotes and probably belong to the Lower and Lower Middle
periods.
CERRO DE LAS MESAS
The site of Cerro de las Mesas lies near the south bank of the
Rio Blanco, some 15 miles east of the Bay of Alvarado. The Rio
Blanco, with its sources in the snows of Citlaltepetl, flows in an
easterly direction into the Bay of Alvarado. During the dry season
from December to May it is for the most part a stream of clear water
too swift and too shallow to be navigable excepting in its extreme lower
reaches. During the remainder of the year it is a muddy torrent,
which inundates much of the bottom land bordering it. The archeol-
ogical site is situated on an “island” of relatively high land apparently
of aeolian origin, which from earliest times has been known as “the
Mixtequilla,” suggesting a former Mixtec occupation. On this “high”
ground are numerous mound groups, of which at least five, Los
‘Pajaros, Santana, Cerro de Gallo, Coyol, and Cerro de las Mesas
may be considered of major importance. These groups cover an
area about 15 miles in length from east to west. The spaces between
the principal groups are dotted with lesser mounds to such an extent
that it is practically impossible to tell where one group ends and
another begins. None of the mound groups are systematically
arranged, although rough quadrangles are usual, with flanking long
mounds, as at Tres Zapotes and La Venta and various other sites in
the general southern Veracruz region. Another feature of the
Mixtequilla groups is the building of mounds on large rectangular
platform bases. The highest mound in this region is that of Cerro
'de Gallo, which, with its platform base, must reach an elevation of
32 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLy. 138
about 100 feet. This may be exceeded in volume, however, by the
principal long mound at Cerro de las Mesas. The Cerro de las Mesas
group, which is located approximately in the middle of the area, is,
however, the most impressive and was probably the ceremonial center
for the region. Excepting for a single crude stela at Cerro de Gallo,
it possesses the only stone monuments in the Mixtequilla. The two
mounds forming the north corners of the monument area are each
pyramidal in shape and approximately 80 feet in height. The two
southern mounds forming the other corners of this quadrangle are
smaller in size. Between them lies a fifth mound, elongated in shape.
Between this mound and the southwestern corner mound lies Plaza 2,
containing the majority of the stone monuments. South of this is
Plaza 1, and just beyond is the laguna, which may be a huge borrow
pit. West of the principal quadrangle is the big long mound, which
parallels the quadrangle, forming Plaza 4, the largest of the four
central squares.
The site is most easily reached from the little town of Piedras
Negras on the Veracruz-Tehuantepec Railway. From here it is about
12 miles by car along the road to Ignacio Llave. This road is pass-
able only during the dry season and then only part of the time.
During the early 1920’s there was considerable oil prospecting in
the Mixtequilla, and a camp was set up at Cerro de Gallo, since re-
named “Numero Uno” for the reason that a prospect well was sunk
at this place. The oil men were attracted by the monuments at nearby
Cerro de las Mesas and, according to the natives, many of the stones
were moved by them in search of treasure.
Curiously enough, there does not seem to be any early publication
on the site, in spite of its accessibility. In 1899 Strebel published
pictures of a number of figurines, mostly of the “laughing face”
type from Cerro de las Mesas. If these actually came from Cerro de
las Mesas, they must have come from a cache, as this type of figurine
is quite rare and not at all typical of the site. However, they do
occur abundantly at the nearby sites of Joaquin, Cerro de Gallo, and
Cocuite.
In 1921, EK. R. Dunn and Prescott Townsend visited the Mixtequilla
and photographed some of the monuments. These pictures were first
called to the writer’s attention by Francis Richardson. In 1924,
D. McH. Forbes, of Portero Viejo, Veracruz, visited the site and
later showed the writer photographs which he had made of some
of the monuments.
In 1927, Dr. Herbert Spinden visited Cerro de las Mesas and,
apart from Strebel’s brief early mention, published the only account
of the site which has appeared. This article in the New York Times
contained drawings of Stelae 4 and 6 and descriptions of several of
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 30
the other monuments. Dr. Spinden identified a number of the figures
as representations of the god Quetzalcoatl and pointed out the frequent
use of the Venus symbol on the carvings (Spinden, 1927).
STELA 1
This monument, in the middle of Plaza 1, is one of the two stelae
in the plaza. When discovered, but a few inches of the top were
visible. The stone is well dressed and shaped, but the only decora-
tion on it is the rudimentary representation of a nose and eyebrows
on the upper part, facing toward the south.
On the lower part of the back of the stone there appears to be
what was once the lower portion of a vertical column in relief.
Except for the extreme lower part, it has been eradicated by a large
concavity, apparently gouged from the back for that purpose after
the stone had originally been shaped. The two stelae in Plaza 1
are the only ones at the site which are undoubtedly in situ.
Near the base of Stela 1 a considerable quantity of lime was en-
countered, together with some heavy fragments of an ornate incen-
sario. The stela is 63 inches high and has a maximum width of
25 inches (pl. 20, a).
STELA 2
Stela 2 was completely buried at the base of the mound at the
west end of Plaza 1. One of the local natives remembered having
struck a stone there years before in cultivating his milpa, and thus
we were able to locate it. Like Stela 1, it was found standing erect,
evidently in situ. The stone was well dressed, but heavier and
thicker than Stela 1 and perfectly plain. Sitting against the south-
west corner of the base was the lower half of an elaborate winged
incensario embedded in a mass of lime made from burned sea, shells,
including some of oyster. A few feet away lay the remains of
another incensario in the form of a “Tlaloc”; this had been coated
with a thin white stucco layer. The stela is 60 inches high and 84
inches in circumference. It is almost square in cross section
(pl. 20, 5).
STELA 3
This stela stands at the south end of Plaza 2 and is carved from a
block of volcanic breccia, the upper part being much eroded. With
this exception, however, the design is pretty well preserved, although
the surface is somewhat rough. The carving represents a standing
figure facing to the left and wearing a buccal mask and circular ear
disk. At first glance it Iooks as though he were holding a long spear,
point downward. Closer inspection, however, shows that what looks
34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ BULL. 138
like the lower part of a spear is really an ornamental apron drape, like |
those worn by the figures on Stelae 5, 6, 8, and 10, while the upper part |
of the “spear handle” which the figure holds in both hands is an |
upright tridentlike object analogous to that held by the figure on
Stela 8. The bustle or rear apron string is in the form of a plumed |
serpent tail, like that on Stela 9. On the feet are sandals, tied with |
elaborate knots in front, and the figure is standing on a rectangular |
“jaguar mask” panel. The stela is 73 inches long, 30 inches wide, and
18 inches thick (pl. 21, a, and fig. 10, ¢).
Ficurr 8.—Carved monument from Santa Lucia Cozumalhualpa.
STELA 4
This stela has carved on it the representation of a man seated on a
“throne” and facing to the right. He wears a large circular ear orna-
ment and a curious wide rectangular headdress. In his left hand he
holds a fan upraised in front of his face; in his right hand he holds a
long pointed bag, like that on Stela 11. Over his knee is a large glyph
representing what seems to be an animal head in profile. Over this
is the number 5 expressed by five dots. Not only does Stela 4 resemble
Stela 11 in style, but these are the only two monuments at the site
carved from the same fine-grained basalt (pl. 21, 6, and fig. 14, 0).
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 35
The stone is 66 inches long, 36 inches wide and 18 inches thick. This
figure is reminiscent of one from Santa Lucia Cozumalhualpa, Guate-
mala (fig. 8).
STELA 5
This stela has been broken in two pieces, which we fitted together as
closely as possible. An elaborately costumed standing figure is rep-
resented, facing to the left with left hand upraised, the fist clenched.
The right index finger points to the middle of a vertical “glyph”
column, which he faces. The designs on this column have been almost
completely effaced, but faint traces of bar and dot numerals can be
detected in the lower half. By analogy with Stelae 6 and 8, it seems
probable that the lower half of this column formerly contained an
Initial Series date, at the beginning of which the figure
is pointing. The personage depicted on the stela wears
an elaborate animal headdress, on top of which is a
plumed serpent with arched body, and on the back of
which is a serpent head with wide-open mouth (pl. 22, a,
and fig. 10, a).
An extremely interesting feature of this monument
is that it is almost a duplicate, in every elaborate de-
tail, of the so-called tapas stone, of unknown
provenience, now in the National Museum of Mexico.
For the sake of comparison, a reproduction of the latter
is published here (fig. 10, 6). An important item in
this connection is the well-preserved glyph column on
the Chapultepec stone, which gives a clue as to the
probable nature of the glyphs used at Cerro de las
Mesas.
The stela is 86 inches long, 38 inches wide, and 18
inches thick.
STELA 6
The carving on Stela 6 is the best preserved of any
monument at Cerro de las Mesas (pl. 23, and figs. 9;
11,6). The figure on the stela represents an elaborately
costumed individual, shown in profile facing to the left.
The headdress represents a conventionalized animal 3 © =i
head surmounted by a serpent whose tail hangs down Fisurs 9.—Glyph
behind the headdress to the right, and whose head with ere
open mouth and projecting bifurcated tongue can be stored. Cerro
seen at the left. The upper middle part of the design eh maces
is defaced. From the mouth of the figure is a small but com-
plex speech scroll. To the left of the figure is a vertical glyph column
36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buut. 138
1
Gin
il ] ob]
Bell
aN
es
Tee
b
FIGURE 10.—a, Stela 5. 6, The Stela of San Miguel Chapultepec. c, Stela 3. Cerro de las Mesas.
carved in the same relief as the figure itself. The glyphs and bar and
dot numerals on it are in very low relief, so that the elements on the
upper part of the column are in large part indistinguishable. Those
portions which remain can only be seen with the light striking them
at an angle. The bar and dot numerals on the lower half of the
column are still fairly clear when the right light is thrown across them.
The bars and dots were drawn freehand, the dots being of somewhat
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 37
irregular circular form and the lines of the bars not geometrically
exact. The elements of each numeral are placed with a minimum of
spacing. When bars and dots are combined, the dots rest directly
onthebar. Where asingle dot is used to indicate the Katun coefficient,
a, Stela 9. 0b, Stela6. c, Stela 8. Cerro de lag Mesas.
Figure 11.
38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (BULL. 138 |
FIGURE 12.—a, Stela 14. 06, Stela 11. c, Stela 13. d, Monument 2, back. Cerro de las
Mesas.
the dot is considerably enlarged. This is reminiscent of the Katun 2
date at Oxintok, Yucatan, in which the Katun dots are considerably
enlarged (Hay et al., 1940, pl. 1).
The Initial Series reads 9-1-12-14-10=1 Oc (8 Uayeb) (fig. 9).
This date is interesting in that it records the next to the last day of
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 39
the year. In the Maya area there are several inscriptions terminating
in 3 Uayeb, but the writer does not know of any ending in any other
day of the Uayeb period. The day sign at the base of the column
is puzzling. According to the calculation it represents one Oc. The
dot representing the one is closely spaced between the numeral 10
and the day sign. The latter is not very clear. It looks something
like a bat face in profile, with a bare mandible over the lower part
of the face. Of this identification, the writer feels very uncertain.
FIGURE 13.—Monument 1, four views. Cerro de las Mesas.
Just above the Baktun coefficient, where in a Maya date the introduc-
ing glyph should be, is a defaced glyph, the exact nature of which is
also uncertain. Parts of other glyphs above this can still be discerned.
The back of Stela 6 is not flat like almost all of the others at the
site, but is irregularly round, the stone having been left in its natural
shape.
STELA 7
This monument lay face down, looking like an ordinary boulder
in the middle of the monument plaza. When turned over, it was
found to have on its face the well-preserved carving of a standing,
40
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
DEN Feet ns rand
[Butt. 188
Cerro de las Mesas.
ce, Monument 5.
b, Stela 4.
Ficurw 14.—a, Stela 12.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 41
full-face, male figure. The legs are separated in a wide V, the toes
pointing outward. A belt, with a conventionalized knot in front,
is worn around the hips. A double, flat collar hangs over the chest
and a tear-shaped pendant hangs from each ear. The right hand
grasps what looks like the handle of a stone ax with decorative
plumes hanging from the upper part. (Compare with Stela 2, La
Venta.) The left hand grasps a circular object with a spiral inside
and from which hangs an object like a fringed pouch. This spiral
ornament reminds one somewhat of the Quetzelcoatl cross section of
a conch shell. A headdress like an inverted U hangs over the top
of the head. A groove passes along the middle of it, and it is curi-
ously spotted with small circular pits. This same pitting decorates
the upper element of the collar. On top of the headdress is carved
a small head. Over the left shoulder is a circular ornament like a
sunflower with four long narrow “ribbons” hanging from it, each with
a circle and dot in the middle. Originally the carved surface was
highly polished, sections of polished surface remaining on the lower
portions of the design. The basalt from which this monument was
carved is harder and finer grained than most monuments at the site.
It is about 60 inches high and seems to have been carved on a naturally
shaped flat boulder (pls. 26; 31, 0).
STELA 8
This is the largest stela at Cerra de las Mesas and is the most
carefully dressed and squared. It is made of basalt of even texture,
but unfortunately the carved surface has suffered considerable ero-
sion. Apart from its size and artistic merit, it is of exceptional
interest because it has on it one of the two decipherable Initial Series
dates at the site. In many respects it resembles quite closely the
design on Stela 3. The principal figure is an elaborately costumed
individual, facing to the left and standing on a well-carved jaguar
mask panel. In front of his face he apparently holds up a rather
bulky object terminating in a tridentlike object resembling a familiar
Zapotec and Mixtec glyph. In front of the standing figure are two
vertical glyph columns as high as the size of the stone permits. The
entire outside column is so badly eroded that probably none of the
glyphs can be restored. The upper half of the inside column is in
the same condition. However, the Initial Series occupying the lower
half of this column is carved in higher relief than the glyphs and
is still in fair condition and may be read. The Baktun number has
been somewhat defaced, the second dot from the left having been
knocked off and the one on the right has a crack in the stone passing
through it. However, there seems little doubt that a 9 was repre-
516040—44—_-4
42 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buut. 138
sented. The complete series reads 9-4-18-16-8=9 Lamat (11 zotz).
The interesting feature of this series is that the day sign at the
bottom of the column actually is a close approximation of the Lamat
sign as used by the Maya. It is also the conventional Venus symbol.
The numbers comprising the column are equally separated, the final
space being bisected by the coefficient of the day sign (pl. 24 and
fig. 1dsie).
As in Stela 6, and probably Stela 5, the hand of the standing figure
points at the beginning of the Initial Series, as though to direct espe-
cial attention to it. From traces remaining of the undecipherable
glyphs on this stela and Stela 6, it is likely that they resembled in char-
acter those on the so-called “Chapultepec stone” (fig. 10, 0).
Stela 8 is 96 inches long, 42 inches wide, and 21 inches thick.
STELA 9
This stone, on the east side of Plaza 1, has carved on its face the
representation of a kneeling figure with the left arm upraised and the
hand grasping an upheld object. The right hand, with elbow on knee,
is holding in front a circular object which seems to have plumes
depending from it. The figure wears an animal headdress, a neck-
lace with tassellike pendants, a broad belt, and a bustle which evidently
takes the form of a plumed serpent. He wears wrist and leg orna-
ments and has sandals on his feet (pl. 21, c, and fig. 11, a).
The stone of which the stela is carved is a volcanic breccia, which has
eroded, producing a rough surface which obscures the finer details of
the design. The stone is well dressed and squared, and before suffer-
ing from erosion it must have been one of the handsomest stelae at the
site.
The figure on this stela resembles quite closely a kneeling figure with
an “Olmec” face, recently discovered by Eric Thompson, carved on a
large boulder at San Isidro Piedra Parada, Guatemala.
STELA 10
This stela, made from a volcanic breccia, has suffered more from
erosion than any other stone at the site. It has carved on it a standing
figure facing to the right, an unusual feature, as the orthodox position
at Cerro de las Mesas is facing to the left. Although the surface is
badly defaced, the standing figure apparently has a jaguar rather than
a human face, another unique feature. Although the carving seems
to have been less skillfully done, this stela resembles most closely Stela
6. The figure wears the same bustle and apron drape and the same
ankle ornaments (pl. 25, a). Resemblances are also evident with
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 43
Stelae 3 and 8, as the same tridentlike object appears to be represented.
Stelae 3, 6, 8, and 10, in fact, seem to constitute a group.
Of this group Stela 10 exhibits the least artistic skill.
The stone is 76 inches long, 45 inches wide, and 16 inches thick.
STELA 11
This stela seems to be carved in a style somewhat different from the
majority at the site, but resembling somewhat Stela 4. Although
parts of the design are well preserved, on the whole the stone is rather
badly damaged. A standing figure is represented, facing to the left.
He wears a large circular ear disk and holds a long pointed pouch in
one hand. In front of him is an object that looks ike a banner and
what seems to be a stand on which is a head mounted on two bars
bound together and looking somewhat like a Zapotecan glyph. The
stone was evidently not very carefully dressed in the first place, al-
though traces of a well-smoothed surface remain (pl. 25, 6, and fig.
12.0).
It is 65 inches long, 85 inches wide, and about 14 inches thick, the
thickness being irregular.
STELA 12
This stone lies in Plaza 3 in the flat just north of Mound 5, and is
one of the three stelae in this plaza. It is shaped about the same as
Stela 6, being round on the back and flat on the face. However, it
contains no carved decoration whatever, sharing this doubtful distinc-
tion only with Stela 2.
It is 66 inches long and 28 inches wide.
STELA 13
This monument had become almost completely buried. Apparently
the upper part of the stela had been broken off and the stone reworked
into an oval shape. All of the carved design had been carefully pecked
off, excepting for the mask panel at the base (fig. 12, ¢). Because of
the existence of this mask panel, it seems probable that the original
stela belonged to the group containing Stelae 3 and 8. Excavation
beneath this monument revealed that it had been erected on an indi-
vidual rectangular stucco-covered earth platform (pl. 27, a). This
platform was in the shape of a much truncated pyramid with rounded
corners. It had been resurfaced about 20 times, and in each instance
the corners had been painted red. This platform is 72 inches square
and 18 inches of stucco remain at the base, although it was undoubtedly
higher originally. In its present form the stela is 48 inches long, 34
inches wide, and 14 inches thick.
44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ Bux, 138
STELA 14
This stela, the third in Plaza 3, lies at the northeast base of the
high mound. It is incomplete, the upper part being broken off. Ap-
parently, it had been broken while still standing and partially buried,
since the upper part of the remaining portion has eroded so badly as
to have completely eradicated that portion of the carved design. The
lower part shows the lower half of a standing figure facing to the
left (pl. 20, c). The stone from which the monument was carved is
well squared, the sides and back being flat and smooth. The stela
is 82 inches wide, 15 inches thick, and its present length is 65 inches.
STELA 15
This stela les alone at the west base of the principal mound, being
the only monument on that side. The carving on the stone seems
quite different in character from that on the other stelae at the site.
It represents an ornate figure in full face, with circular Tlaloc-like
eyes and wearing a jaguar headdress with a damaged glyphlike
ornament in front, and long plumes hanging down the sides. The
hands are each grasping a short twisted object resembling a piece
of rope unraveled at the end. Large circular ear plugs are worn,
below which are circular ornaments showing a cross with a dot in the
center. A wide collar passes over the chest, from which depend seven
tassellike ornaments. Most of the remainder of the design area is
covered with a puzzling series of objects, which may represent shells.
In the lower center are two vertically placed glyphs. The upper
one shows an animal head in profile, and below this the numeral 4 and
another glyph. This may represent the date 1 Ocelot 4 Water. The
stone has suffered damage on the upper right-hand side, but excepting
for surface detail, most of the design is intact. The stone was care-
fully shaped and dressed, the sides and back being smooth (pl. 22, bd).
It is 77 inches long, 44 anes wide, and 20 inches thick.
MONUMENT 1
This stone les at the southern edge of the monument plaza. It is
in the form of a somewhat laterally compressed hemisphere, the
curved surface of which is covered with carving. The stone itself
may represent a conventionalized head, as it has on either side what
looks like a large ear plug. On one end of the stone is represented
a standing or kneeling figure, with one empty eye socket, and a sharp
implement in the act of gouging out the other eye. This is an episode
which is occasionally represented in the codices.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 45
On the other end of the stone is what may be a sun symbol. A
face is shown in the middle of a device like a simplified Mexican
“calendar stone” (pl. 29 and fig. 13).
MONUMENT 2
From an artistic standpoint Monument 2 is probably the most
striking object at Cerro de las Mesas (pls. 26, 31, a). It consists of
a head powerfully sculptured in full relief. On the forehead is an
ornament something like a fleur-de-lis. A large nose ornament lies
over the upper lip, with a curling, moustachelike scroll on each side
of the mouth. The lower jaw seems bare, and the upper teeth exposed.
Circular ear ornaments are worn, and from each eye three streaks,
like tears, pass over the cheeks. This head may represent the same
personage indicated on Stela 3, the principal point of difference being
the absence on the latter of the curling “moustaches” beside the mouth.
There are also similarities with Stela 8, and these may give us a clue
to the period to which this fine head belongs. The back of the head
is flat, and it is decorated with a design in low relief, so crudely done
that it seems certain to have been done at a later time than the head
itself was sculptured (pl. 27, 6, and fig. 12 d). This design shows
at the left a standing male figure, facing to the right. At the right
is a seated nude female figure in what appears to be an attitude of
complete dejection. Between these two figures is a vertical column
which may once have been decorated, but which now contains no
ornamentation whatever. From the shape of the head, it appears that
it was made to lie on its back, looking upward. It is 69 inches long,
40 inches wide, and 380 inches thick.
MONUMENT 8
This is a plain stone ball carved in the form of a slightly oblate
spheroid. This stone hes within the monument plaza (pl. 30, d).
MONUMENT 4
This is a stone ball somewhat smaller than Monument 8, and with
one plane surface. It also lies in the monument plaza (pl. 30, d).
MONUMENT 5
An almost completely buried stone, near the middle of Plaza 2,
when excavated turned out to be this curious monument, seemingly
representing a fat standing male figure, with the toes pointing out-
ward, and, because of the shape of the stone, backward as well. The
46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLt. 138
genitalia are plainly represented. The right hand is shown as grasp-
ing some object over the right knee, while the left hand hangs by
the side. Two pendant ornaments hang over the front of the shoul-
ders. A broad low crest covers the top of the head and a triple belt
goes around the waist. A broad rectangular ornament passes across
the upper lip, and from it hangs a broad rectangular object, almost like
a protruding tongue. The observer is struck at once by the resem-
blance of this monument to the famous Tuxtla Statuette, a resemblance
which is more in form and spirit than in detail (pl. 28 and fig. 14, c).
MONUMENT 6
Near the southeastern base of the principal mound at one corner of
the monument plaza, a small portion of a hard, fine-grained basaltic
stone projected above the ground. When excavated this proved to
be what was left of a large and massive monument which had been
so carefully and thoroughly defaced that only a few small sections
of the decorated surface remain. These exhibit a well carved and
highly polished surface, but not enough of the surface remains to
give a hint as to the nature of the monument. It must have been,
however, one of the finest, if not the finest at the site.
MONUMENT 7
This is a stone carved in the form of an animal or reptile head, and
is complete. The eyes are shown as half closed, with a wide circle
surrounding them. Teeth are indicated the full length of the wide
mouth, with a long canine fang projecting downward on each side of
the front part of the mouth (pl. 30, a).
At present this monument lies under a mango grove at the edge of
the village of Ojochal, about a mile north of Cerro de las Mesas. It
was moved from the monument plaza at Cerro de las Mesas to its
present site about 15 years ago, according to the natives.
MONUMENT 8
This monument is in the form of a head, probably of an anthropo-
morphic monkey. The eyes are round and wide and have realistic
eyebrows represented over them. The nose is broad and rather flat.
The lips are thin and parted, exposing six teeth, with the two front
incisors long and rodentlike. On each side of the mouth is a curling
“moustache” element as on a Tlaloc. Hair is represented on the top
and back of the head by parallel vertical striations. A headband
passes over the forehead and has an ornament in glyph form in front.
The head is 30 inches high (pl. 30, ¢).
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 47
At present this monument lies in a field near the edge of the village
of Cocuite. It was moved from the east side of the monument plaza at
Cerro de las Mesas several years ago, where, of all the monuments
at the site, it was the center of the most superstitious regard from the
natives of the region. It was formerly the custom among many to
bring eggs or chickens to it at night as offerings; for what specific
purpose we were unable to determine, other than to ward off witch-
eraft. A native of Cocuite, wishing to profit by it, brought it to his
house, but before long became frightened, and hauled it out to the
field outside the town, where it now reposes.
MISCELLANEOUS
In addition to the foregoing, there are four large unworked stones
in Plaza 2, one unworked cigar-shaped stone in Plaza 3, one flat
unworked stone in the middle of Plaza 4, and a large stone set up at
the north edge of the platform on which Mound 2 is erected.
CONCLUSION
On stylistic grounds, it is possible to suggest a relative chronology
for the stone monuments at Cerro de las Mesas. Monument 5 seems
to be the earliest in style. The low, flat median crest, the outpointing
feet, and the simple yet confident handling of the subject matter sug-
gest an early but developed art style. The representation of the
genitalia, relatively unusual in Mexico, suggests the early “Danzante”
figures of Monte Alban. The generalized resemblance of the entire
sculpture to the Tuxtla Statuette suggests a Baktun 8 dating. Next
in point of time would come the dated Stelae 6 and 8, and Stela 5 with
its undecipherable glyph column. ‘These three stelae are made from
fairly fine-grained basalt of good quality, and all three of these stones
probably came from the same source. Very close to them in point of
time must be Stelae 3, 10, 138, and 14. These stones are so closely
related in style and subject matter to the preceding three as to be as-
signable to the same general period. This group has been manu-
factured from basalt from a different source apparently, since it con-
tains hard inclusions like a volcanic breccia, and erosion produces a
rough surface effect. Whether they precede or follow the dated stones
in time isa problem. In this complete group 3, 8, and 13 have “mask
panels” below the carved figures.
The most recent of the stelae, the writer would surmise, are 4 and
11. They are carved from a hard fine-grained basalt different from
the others at the site. Stylistically, they stand alone. The numerical
“name” glyph on Stela 4, the long pouch, the seat, and the fan suggest
subject matter of more recent origin, as does the banner and the pouch
48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY {Bux 138
on Stela 11. Stela 15 also seems to be of relatively more recent date. |
The Tlaloc-like eyes, the flowing plumes, and especially the “Tonala-
matl” date seem to belong to a different culture. The twisted “ropes”
held in the hands suggest the ceremonial penitential ropes of the ©
Zapotecs (Seler, 1904, p. 283). Incidentally, this is the one stela
which stands alone, having been placed on the opposite side of the |
principal mound from all the rest.
Stela 9 with the kneeling figure is somewhat puzzling. The writer
is inclined to place it with the more recent group. The necklace of
“tassels” is reminiscent of that on Stela 15. The use of flowing plumes
is another later feature. The kneeling posture is unique and also |
tends to place it with the later monuments, each of which is highly |
individual in composition as contrasted with the early group, which
is quite stereotyped in style.
Monument 1 the writer would also assign to the more recent group.
The incident of gouging out an eye is frequently represented in the
Zapotecan and Mexican codices. In the former, the act is performed
by another, priest or god, while in the latter it is self-inflicted. Ac-
cording to Seler, this act, as represented in the codices of the Borgian
group, is connected with Venus ceremonials (Seler, 1906, p. 367). The
“sun” symbol on one end of the stone also suggests a relatively recent
art style.
The relationship of Monument 2 to Stelae 3 and 8 has already been
pointed out, and it can be placed with confidence in that group, which
represented the “golden age” of stone carving at Cerro de las Mesas.
LA VENTA
The archeological site of La Venta is situated on a sandy island
lying between the Tonala River and its tributary, the Blasillo, in the
midst of the great coastal mangrove swamp of northern Tabasco
(Stirling, 1940 b). The central feature is a large pyramidal earth
mound erected on a rectangular platform, almost 100 yards square.
The combined height of the base and the mound is 105 feet. At the
north base of this mound lies an unusually interesting rectangular
stone-fenced enclosure. About 300 yards south of the main mound
is a long mound which extends about 200 feet in a north-south direc-
tion. Near this are a few smaller mounds. Scattered about the site
are numerous stone monuments, many of which are remarkable for
their size and their high artistic merit. The grouping of high pyram-
idal earth mounds in conjunction with a long mound is reminiscent
of many sites in southern Veracruz, such as Tres Zapotes and Cerro
de las Mesas. Unlike these, however, there appears to be a certain
amount of orientation to the principal structures at La Venta, the
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 49
alignment being based on an axial line in an approximate north-south
direction.
The first mention of the La Venta site is by Charnay (1887), who
in 1881 heard about it in an inaccurate way from a native in Comal-
calco. Charnay says:
Besides these ruins [Comalcalco] others are to be met at Blasillo, situated on
the Toltec march of migration, answering the description given by Bernal Diaz
regarding Tonala. I hear from a montanero, who first discovered them, that an
important Indian City formerly existed there, whose monuments, like those of
Comalcalco, consist of caryatides, columns, and statues; but in this abominable
weather it is utterly impossible to visit them.
The first real description of La Venta is by Blom and La Farge
(1925), who visited it in 1925. They were able to spend but one day
at the site, and did not have the time or equipment for excavation.
However, they saw Stelae 1, 2, and 3; Altars 2, 3, and 4; and Monu-
ment 1. In addition to this, Blom proved that the two stone figures
now standing in the grounds of the Instituto Juarez in Villa Hermosa
originally came from La Venta. It was Blom’s photograph of the
almost buried Monument 1 that attracted the writer’s interest to La
Venta, because of the obvious resemblance of this monument to the
Colossal Head of Tres Zapotes. To avoid confusion, the numbers
given by Blom to the monuments discovered by him have been re-
tained, with the exception of the one he calls Altar 1, which on excava-
tion turned out to be a stela; this has been designated as Stela 3.
In 1931, Joyce published a note concerning the site from informa-
tion received from H. A. Knox, who stumbled onto it during a hunting
trip, and furnished pictures showing Altar 4 and Stela 1. (Joyce,
1931). The most interesting feature of the illustrations accompanying
this note is a picture of two good-sized pottery heads of related forms,
presumably from La Venta, one of which is a typical “baby-face” type.
Joyce was evidently unaware of Blom’s previous publication.
Not counting the stone columns, we located 17 carved monuments
at La Venta, including those listed above. With the 2 at Villa
Hermosa, this makes a total of 19 now known from the site. To these
might be added the unique stone sarcophagus and the tomb of basalt
columns discovered by Dr. Drucker during the 1942 excavations. It
is quite probable that further explorations will reveal more, either
hidden in the dense jungle or buried in the thick deposit which has
accumulated over the site. There seems little doubt that a carved altar
lies completely buried near the base of the detached mound known as
Cerro Encantado, since two natives independently led me to the place
and each seemed surprised that it was not visible. They stated that a
short time ago the upper surface was flush with the ground. Our time
at the site was limited and we did not have time to probe for it. A
50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ Buu, 138
smal] circular carved stone “like a calendar stone” was formerly on
the surface near Monument 4. Hunters carried it away a few years
ago.
One of the striking features of La Venta is the lavish use of col-
umnar basalt. We have been unable to locate the source of this mate-
rial. The nearest occurrence of volcanic rock is in the region of the
San Martin Pajapan volcano, some 60 miles in an air line to the north.
Insomuch as columnar basalt is also used at archeological sites such
as Tres Zapotes and El Meson, it would seem highly probable that the
material was obtained somewhere in the Tuxtla-San Martin region.
The question of its transportation to La Venta constitutes an interest-
ing problem. The transportation of 20- to 50-ton blocks of stone over-
land for such a distance would seem to constitute an almost super-
human task, especially when it is remembered that La Venta is on an
island in the middle of a great swamp region.
The most probable hypothesis would seem to be that the stones
were secured near the seacoast, and placed on large rafts, whence they
were floated along the coast to the mouth of the Tonala River, which
was then ascended to La Venta Island. At the present time, the river
is a considerable distance from the island, but aerial photographs
show clearly an old channel which touched the north end of the island.
It is quite probable that this marked the course of the river at the time
the site was occupied. At the present time, there is enough water
along this old course for the inhabitants of La Venta to use it as a
short cut in going by canoe to Tonala.
STELA 1
This unusual monument probably represents the open mouth of a
jaguar, with a standing human figure in almost full relief. The panel
above the figure shows a conventionalized jaguar face, while below the
feet are a series of defaced serrations which are probably meant for
teeth. The human figure, possibly representing a female, is nude ex-
cept for a short fluted skirt, a forehead band, and possibly a close-
fitting helmet. Ornaments appear to be hanging from the ear lobes.
A trench dug beneath the stone indicates that the back is plain. At
present this stela lies a short distance outside the southwest corner of
the stone-fenced enclosure, and probably formerly had been set up
within it. The stela is 8 feet 3 inches long, 2 feet 11 inches wide at the
base, and 2 feet 5 inches thick. The human figure is 4 feet 10 inches
high (pl. 33, a).
STELA 2
This large stela represents a standing male figure in half relief.
The lower part of the design is mutilated, but evidently the toes point
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 51
outward. Diagonally across his chest the figure holds a staff, the
handle of which is grasped with both hands. From the upper end
a tassellike ornament hangs over the right shoulder. Behind the
shoulders and back is a circular object, possibly a shield with orna-
ments hanging on either side ef the hips. Bands are worn around
the wrist and ankles. In the ears are circular ear disks, and on the
head is a remarkably tall and elaborate headdress, the extreme upper
part of which is mutilated. The headdress seems to be held in place
by means of a chin strap.
In the spaces on either side of the central figure, carved in low relief,
are six crouching, barefooted figures, three on each side, one over the
other. All six appear to be brandishing axes or batons. Each of
them wears a broad belt, circular ear ornaments, and a headdress
fastened by means of a chin strap. The three figures at the observer’s
left are better preserved than the ones on the right. Their faces are
like anthropomorphic jaguars with projecting fangs. All of these
figures are looking to the right, the first group looking backward
over their shoulders in order to do so. The face of the central figure,
although somewhat worn, is “a Venta” in type and the expression
one of serene dignity (pl. 34).
Judging from the erosion of the stone, the monument had fallen
in such a manner that the right side became buried, leaving the left
side exposed for a longer period. ‘This stela is 11 feet 5 inches long,
and has a maximum width of 6 feet 9 inches. The thickness is
approximately 18 inches.
It seems to have been carved from a naturally formed slab of
stone, which had a smooth but irregular surface. Not much attempt
was made to level off these irregularities, and the carved designs fol-
low them over the surface.
STELA 3
This interesting monument, the largest at La Venta, is located
in the middle of the stone-fenced court, and faces north. The back
and sides are plain, but the face is entirely covered with an elaborate
composition in low relief (pl. 35). This huge stone was excavated
and photographed with considerable difficulty, since it was leaning
forward at a steep angle. Although protected somewhat from the
elements by the angle of the stone, nevertheless the upper portion
of the design is considerably weathered. The lower two-thirds, which
had been buried, is very little weathered, but it had been mutilated,
apparently intentionally, in aboriginal times. The lower part of the
composition consists of two large human figures represented in profile,
facing each other. The one on the observer’s left wears a belt, arm
bands, a skirt, and an extremely tall headdress. In the right hand is
ao BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY L[BoLL. 138 |
carried a staff. No ear disk is worn, the ear being realistically rep- _
resented. Unfortunately, the face has been scaled off. It is possible |
that a female is intended. The other large figure, slightly taller,
represents a handsome bearded man with aquiline nose, large cir- |
cular ear ornament, and a complicated headdress. Most of the body |
has been scaled off. Both figures appear to be wearing shoes with |
pointed, upturned toes. Above these two principal figures can be |
seen at least four other human or anthropomorphic forms, floating |
about in various postures. One of these is a “jaguar” man closely |
similar to those represented on Stela 2.
This stone, which has a calculated weight of about 50 tons, is 14
feet high, 6 feet 8 inches wide, and 36 inches thick. A large fragment
broken from the upper right-hand side of the monument was found
in the excavation in front of the stela.
This is probably the stone which Blom refers to as Altar 1, a
natural enough mistake, as the stela was buried excepting for the
curved upper portion, which made it appear as though it might have
been circular in form.
STELA 4
This stone, well buried, lay in the flat about 100 feet north of the
long mound. Judging from its shape, it was intended as a stela
(pl. 383, c). Formerly covered on three sides with carved decorations,
it has been defaced so completely that nothing can be deciphered of
the original designs. The base is covered with scored striations
(pl. 38, d). These may have been used to sharpen the stone tools of
the carvers of the monument, as the surface of the base would not
show when the stela stood up. It is about 5 feet high.
STELA 5
A large fragment of a worked stone was excavated just outside
the stone enclosure near the southwest corner. Although there is
no carved decoration, it seems to be a piece of what was once a large
stela (pl. 33, b). In excavating this stone several large slabs of lime-
stone were found lying south of the base. It is 7 feet high and 2 feet
6 inches thick.
ALTAR 1
This stone, presumably an altar, was discovered almost completely
buried in the level ground south of the big mound. The altar, which
is rectangular in shape, is in the form of a colossal head, which faces
east toward the mound. It has been considerably mutilated, particu-
larly on top. In spite of this mutilation the face still produces a
striking effect on the observer. The nostrils are broad and flaring
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 53
and below them is represented a curving nose or lip ornament. The
eyes are long and narrow, being almost rectangular in form. Above
the eyes the beetling brows are separated by a puckered forehead,
and over each brow rise vertical elements which may have been
similar to those conventionalized “eyebrows” frequently represented
on “baby-face” figures in jade. The north and south ends of the
altar are decorated with a curious branching five-pronged element
(pl. 36). A broad hairdress runs down the back. <A curious feature
of this altar is an irregular hole, possibly of natural origin, which
runs through the stone from the north end and emerges through the
mouth in front. Although the stone is roughly rectangular, the corners
have been rounded off. The length is 9 feet 7 inches, the width 6 feet
10 inches, and the height 6 feet 2 inches.
ALTAR 2
This altar, placed on the south apron of the big mound, lies but a
few feet east of Altar 3. It had fallen over on its back, or, more
likely, was re-used in that position, so that the original front of the
altar is now on top (pl. 38, c).
The carving represents a male figure seated cross-legged in an
arched niche, holding some object, possibly a baby, on his lap. Per-
haps the same subject as that on Altar 5 is intended, but the work-
manship on Altar 2 is so primitive as to make the comparison a libel.
The east and west sides of the altar are smooth and undecorated.
The south side is rough. The stone is 4 feet 5 inches long, 4 feet 3
inches wide, and 8 feet 3 inches high.
ALTAR 3
A few feet west of Altar 2, on the south apron of the great mound,
is Altar 3 (pl. 39). The workmanship on this altar is much superior
to that of Altar 2, but unfortunately it has been considerably defaced.
The front of the altar faces north, and, like the others, represents a
male figure seated in a deep niche. He wears a high headdress with
a chin strap similar to that on Altar 5, and also has ear plugs, a flat
collar over his shoulders, and a rectangular, glyphlike chest orna-
ment. The lower arms are broken off, and if they once held anything
it is now gone. At the left of the niche is a panel with a standing
figure in profile, carved in low relief. This figure wears a longish
skirt and probably represents a female. The west end of the altar
is bordered near the top with a horizontal band, below which is a
row of circular dots. The base is bordered with another horizontal]
band originally supported by three oval elements, two of which
still remain. On this, represented in low relief, are two figures seated
54 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Burw. 138
in profile. They face each other and are apparently engaged in
lively discussion. They are skillfully carved, and the attitude and
action is surprisingly realistic. The figure on the observer’s right
has a rather large pointed beard. He has a small headdress with a
forehead band, and wears a belt and a string of beads around his
hips. The other figure also wears a small headdress with a chin
strap, and seems to have a small beard or a pointed chin. He wears
a necklace and a broad belt. The east end of the altar has been
entirely broken away. It is probable that this section contained a
carved panel to balance that on the other side of the niche, and that
the east end of the altar was also decorated in low relief.
Altars 2 and 3 are closely related in style to Altars 4 and 5, and
if it were not that the principal figure of Altar 3 is so badly defaced,
it might have compared favorably with them in artistic merit. The
altar is carved from an almost cubical block of basalt, which formerly
had an overhanging top, all the projecting sides of which have been
broken off. It is 5 feet 6 inches long, 5 feet 3 inches wide, and 5 feet
3 inches high.
ALTAR 4
This interesting altar is remarkable both for its size and state of
preservation (pl. 37, a). It is in the form of a rectangular block
supporting a table top which projects on all four sides. The only
notable mutilation which the altar has suffered has been the breaking
off of the projecting top on the south side. On the front of the altar
top is carved the face of a jaguar with an X-shaped element between
the fangs. On either side of this face are some simple geometric
elements. Stretching across the top of the altar behind this face
is a raised area, giving the impression that a jaguar skin thrown
across the altar is represented. The face of the altar stand shows
a human figure in full relief seated cross-legged in a deep arched
niche. He wears a small headdress with a band across the forehead,
a broad flat collar over his shoulders, and a chest ornament. In each
hand he grasps the end of a rope, which runs around the base of the
altar, forming a border. That held in the right hand rounds the
corner, where it is tied to the wrist of a seated figure carved in low
relief on the south end of the altar (pl. 87, 6). On each side of the
niche in front of the altar are two pleasing, curving elements which
break the blank areas on the front.
The north end of the altar had originally contained a design in low
relief, probably comparable to that on the south end, but in aboriginal
times this end was defaced and two deep rectangular niches carved
in it (pl. 38, 6). The back of the altar is plain. The niche in the
front evidently represents the ‘““Olmec” open-jaguar-mouth motive
since the designs on the band over the niche represent eyes.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 5D
Altar 4 faces east and is located in the fiat near the east base of
the long mound, being on the opposite side of this mound from
Altar 5. In excavating in front of the altar, 99 large, highly polished
jade beads, cylindrical and spherical in form, and one round amethyst
bead were found. These beads were in position as strung in a necklace
and two bracelets. The measurements of the altar are as follows:
HOSTS HOLE ASC eee om at td ee ae ea Re ee 8 feet 5 inches.
\WVEGITIEY GLE DEUS EE 3 ae SE Sek EA kL Es ee A TL Ne ip eee 6 feet.
TRUBAEVOUE GE |UPEESTSNE =e I ey eS aed a a ae ae 3 feet 6 inches.
Omermnalwen stl tO. ea oe 2 ee A ee ee 11 feet 5 inches.
AVAIL OUR WO Se ee Ae Pe ie pe OS 6 feet 4 inches.
BIRIEKMeSS Oe COP. et | ert a ee 1 foot 9 inches.
Ienethorioverhamg a Ses ce 5 i coders eee Yeasts ees eas Se 1 foot 6 inches.
Totaleneieh tof altar ate oe. 20 eee a ee 5 feet 3 inches.
ALTAR 5
This handsome example of aboriginal sculpture was discovered in a
newly cleared banana patch, almost completely buried. It is located
on level ground on the opposite side of the long mound from Altar 4,
which it resembles in general form. Originally, it possessed a flat
projecting table top, but this has been almost completely battered off.
It is sculptured on the front and both ends, but the back is plain. Like
Altar 4, it faces away from the mound, toward the west. Altar 4,
being on the east side of the mound, faces east. The altar had settled
forward at an angle, making it difficult in our limited time to obtain
photographs of the front in proper perspective. The face of the altar
shows an arched niche, in which is seated cross-legged a male figure
carved in full relief. This figure wears a tall headdress in the form of
a truncated cone. A band around the base of the headdress is deco-
rated with an X on either side and in front a face with down-curved
mouth set in an oval cartouche over which are three vertical cone-
shaped elements. The ears of the principal figure are adorned with
spool-shaped ear plugs, he wears a flat collar with a gorget over the
chest, and on his lap he holds the limp figure of a baby (pl. 40).
The south end of the altar is carved in low relief and shows two
seated adult figures facing west, and each holding a nude infantile
figure in amusingly realistic positions. The faces of these small
figures, however, have an adult appearance (pl. 41, a).
The north end of the altar is decorated with a similar design, repre-
senting two more seated adults, each holding an infantlike figure (pl.
41,6). Unfortunately, the southwest corner of the altar has been bro-
ken away, taking with it the faces of one of these pairs. As in Altar
4, it seems possible that the niehe in front represents the open mouth
of a jaguar.
56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bout 138 |
Although this altar has been badly battered, fortunately most of the |
decorated areas remain in quite good condition, probably as a result of |
the stone being buried. In its entirety, this altar is one of the finest
examples of sculptural art from pre-Columbian America. Because |
of the mutilations that it has suffered, the original over-all measure- |
ments cannot be given. At present the altar is 5 feet 1 inch high. The
height of the seated figure in front is 3 feet 4 inches. The stone is a
greenish-gray basalt with black crystalline inclusions.
ALTAR 6
This altar is located near a small mound in the Cerro Encantado
group about a mile northwest of the main La Venta site. Although |
related in concept to the previously described altars from the main La |
Venta site, the art style is conspicuously different, the carving being
angular and relatively crude (pl. 38, a). A figure seated cross-legged
in a vestigial niche is represented. A small, broad headdress with a
chin strap is worn, and possibly a face was represented in the middle
of the headdress. The eyes of the figure are crudely carved and the
nose is a triangular blob. The lower part of the face is broken off.
The entire figure is represented as sitting on a projecting ledge, and
the “table top” of the altar is indicated with a minimum of projection.
At present the altar has settled backward somewhat, so that the figure
in front looks upward. It was excavated with difficulty, as it had
become wrapped in the buttresses of a large sapote tree. The top
length is 4 feet 6 inches and the top width 2 feet 10 inches. The bot-
tom length is 3 feet 5 inches and the height 3 feet 9 inches.
MONUMENT 1
This monument in the form of a colossal head was erected near
the south base of the great mound only about 15 yards distant from
Stela 2. The head faces south, away from the mound. It has
settled to one side, but is apparently otherwise in position as set up
(pl. 42, a). In general appearance this head, although considerably
larger, is very similar to the Colossal Head of Tres Zapotes. The
features are realistically represented and are “Olmec” in character.
It is represented as wearing a helmetlike headdress with a headband
and a U-shaped figure and jaguar fangs over the forehead. The back
of the head is flat, a feature which it also shares with the Tres Zapotes
head as well as with the other heads at La Venta. The state of preser-
vation is very good. Most of the damage which has taken place is at
the back of the stone. The top of the head is marked with a number
of striations. It is difficult to tell whether these were intended as part
of the decorative scheme or whether they are more modern tool
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 57
sharpening grooves. The following are some of the more interesting
measurements:
PER eee eee eee ae ee ee ee ee 8 feet 1 inch.
AOga ETT ROT) G Omen ee ete tet yr ES ae ee ee 20 feet 10 inches.
Neer AnMeGiRe VC Daler fest. et eo ee oo ee 1 foot 4 inches.
VANDEL OYE, ICONS gE SU ee ee 1 foot 11 inches.
PMT tM OSGeo ee ee SP Be 1 foot 4 inches.
eT NeO ae Te OU teres ee et 2 feet 5 inches.
ee dh wOremOulne = 2s eae ee 8 ee es 2 11 inches.
MONUMENT 2
This is the middle one of three heads set in a row and facing north,
two hundred yards north of the big mound. Like Monument 1, it
wears a helmetlike headdress, which has an ornament like a bowknot
in front. The cheeks are full, and the mouth represented with the
lips parted and four front upper teeth showing. The corners of
the mouth are wide, producing somewhat of a smiling effect. The
stone is spotted with a number of hemispherical holes which look as
though they may have been ground in. However, they may be owing
to the eroding out of soft inclusions in the basalt. They are not
bubbles such as often occur in lava. In the ear lobes are worn plain
and moderately small ear disks. The head is well preserved, al-
though some damage has been done to the upper lip and the lower
part of the nose (pl. 43). The following are some of the measure-
- ments:
EV ply (oe menernees et eek Se SE Tee SDE reli Sie ee eee 6 feet 3 inches.
Circumterenceiat herdband=== 2" 2s St Se 12 feet 11 inches.
MC GhUEO tee Ve auerers sn ee te ks Fee LTE ek BENE Ue 12 inches.
HICISNtLOL Cy Chall sees ee Lee er eee Ee PLPC ET ee 6 inches.
INOS@R Drea CGI ee = ree oa aye Beh cecal indie: seme 2 abe) aso pets 1 foot 10 inches.
PINS ob i 2 Bp Ta a 4 ea ae 1 foot 2 inches.
‘\AVSUG CELA OME: TO 6CO U Vaepe etal a A nee te Miata ery Ee tN alee 2 feet.
MONUMENT 3
This is the easternmost of the three heads placed in a row north
of the great mound. It is flatter than the other heads at the site
and the style is somewhat different. The fact that the face has
suffered considerable erosion may enhance this individual appear-
ance. The eyes are large and deep-set, the nose broad, and the
mouth shown with the lips parted. In the ears are worn circular
_ ear disks, with holes in the middle. No helmet or headband is indi-
cated. On the back and to a lesser extent, on top, are many striated
grooves, similar to those on the base of Stela 4. In addition to these,
_ there are a number of hemispherical holes that look as though they
_ had been ground, as in Monument 2. In this instance, however, sev-
516040—44—_5
58 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (Buu. 138
eral of these holes are fairly large (pl. 42, 6). The principal meas-
urements are as follows:
Ee] on Cae See ee ee ee ee oe ee BREN S eee es Sa 6 feet.
Width es 22 ee eae Be Beer alh tie a ea eee, aL ee 5 feet 3 inches.
BUREN CSI OS Sees ee af en Lg ee Pee arog Pee ee Se 2 feet 9 inches.
Gircumfterences A oe 22s sees ee 8 Poe ee eo Vee ee eel BT CCU on Chess
Myevene th See = © Jove seth Ae A ee ee ee ee __. 1 foot 8 inches.
Nyeswidth= 220s 2 ees Re ee eee uP Bae neh eet eel 7 inches.
BreadenvOLmoses =) ew aes Sees SN ee DP Sa ee 1 foot 8 inches.
ET QTS COLI OS Ca ee a ee ee 1 foot 3 inches.
Poneth OL Mowe ee ee ee en eee
1S (es Fel ni roy MY ECVO| 5480 ONE Re Se Rah OIE ese RL A eG. RI 1 foot 1 inch.
MONUMENT 4
This is the largest colossal head at the site, being slightly larger
than Monument 1, which it resembles in many respects (pl. 44, a).
The features are very realistically represented and the face has a
slight scowl produced by a puckering at the base of the nose. The
lips are parted and four upper teeth are shown. An ornamented
helmetlike headdress is worn, with striations on top as in Monument
1. The decorations on the headdress evidently represent jaguar fangs.
The back of the head is flat (pl. 44, 6) and the headband is
represented as passing entirely around. The ears are shown with
large ear disks decorated with a cross. The nose has been worn flat
and the chin broken. Damage has also resulted from scaling, particu-
larly on the right side, but in spite of these defects, this huge
head still presents an imposing appearance. A fragment of the head
recovered in excavating around it was coated with a smooth-surfaced
dark purplish-red paint, indicating that originally the head had been
so painted. The principal measurements follow:
18 (i) ee ee ee ae ee 8 feet 5 inches.
@UPCUIMMECHEN CO ia I A a eS ha es ae ee eee 21 feet 7 inches.
Dengthvot eyeball. 22 se ieee ee ee eee ee ee 1 foot 4 inches.
WW GLU Tr Ly Se ss: a oe Se es end ee Se 2 feet 4 inches.
Gio tOf MOSS 2e = 2 a Sk ie a is ee 1 foot 2 inches.
NYA Tay eV UC es 8005 Uy 0 Meme Ua ESE i BUF al Meo re 2 feet 8 inches.
MONUMENT 5
This interesting figure was discovered near Stela 1, within the stone
enclosure north of the big mound. It was completely buried except
for the upper part of the crest on top of the head. It is probably
the most typically “Olmec” of any carving from La Venta (pl. 45, a).
It represents a kneeling “baby-face” figure with a median crest
hanging over the forehead, and holding between the hands a rectan-
gular bowl. The figure is 4 feet 8 inches high.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 59
THE STONE ENCLOSURE
On the flat ground just north of the big mound lies a structure of
unusual interest. This consists of a rectangular enclosure about 75
yards wide in an east-west direction and about 50 yards wide in a
north-south direction (pl. 46, @). On the south side, nearest the
mound are two smaller rectangular offsets each about 15 feet square.
This entire area is fenced in by stone pickets of columnar basalt. The
tops of these columns project a little above the surface of the ground
and a number have the tops broken off. They are set as closely
together as they can be placed. We made a small excavation in one
corner of the enclosure, following these stone posts down to a depth
of 5 feet without finding indication of the bottom. One of the fairly
large columns was measured, and it was found to be 17 inches in diame-
ter and 4 feet 8 inches in circumference. The length is not known, as
we did not have time to excavate to the bottom. In about the middle of
the enclosure is Stela 3, the largest at the site. Several yards west of
this, Monument 5, the kneeling “baby-face” figure, was discovered ; near
the southwest corner was Stela 5. Old Sebastian told us that many
years ago, another “idolo” was taken away from this place. This is
probably one of those now at Villa Hermosa, illustrated by Blom
(Blom and La Farge, 1926). It is probable that Stela 1 was also
originally within this enclosure, as it now lies but a short distance
outside the southwest corner, whither it was moved many years ago by
mahogany cutters in an unsuccessful attempt to take it away, accord-
ing to Sebastian. It seems highly probable that complete excavation
of this area would produce interesting results, as the deep fill which
it contains would completely cover any small or fallen monuments.
MONUMENT 6
Directly south of the stone enclosure and in line with its center was
a low mound, which when excavated was found to cover a sandstone
sarcophagus in the form of a conventionalized jaguar. This was cov-
ered with a lid on which was a shallow, rectangular depression. The
box was almost filled with clay and contained a number of objects of
jade (Stirling, 1942). (PI. 47, a.)
MONUMENT 7
A few yards south of Monument 6, covered by the same mound
and on the same north-south line, was an interesting closed tomb con-
structed of columnar basalt. It contained a limestone covered plat-
form on which were placed several burials enclosed in cinnabar and
accompanied by a considerable number of jade offerings (Stirling,
1942). (PI. 48.)
60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bunn, 138
STONE COLUMNS
Several stone columns occur at various localities on the site. The
largest of these is located on top of the long mound at the south end.
It is made of a hard, gritty, greenish-white stone, apparently of remote
sedimentary origin. It is cylindrical in form, has a diameter of 2 feet
2 inches, a circumference of 6 feet, and an over-all length of 15 feet
4inches. It is broken into two pieces. Its position on top of a mound
is unique for a large stone among all of the sites we have investigated in
southern Mexico (pl. 46, 5).
A quarter of a mile northeast of the long mound is a steep gully.
Slanting against the bottom of this are two pillars of a very hard basal-
tic stone. They are smooth of finish and rectangular in cross section. .
The two sides of each which are visible are without carved decorations.
One is 5 feet 4 inches long and 13 inches square. The other is 6 feet
1 inch long by 13 inches square.
At the north base of the Cerro Encantado we excavated a cylindrical
column made of the same hard, greenish, gritty stone as the large col-
umn on the long mound. This column is 7 feet 9 inches long. A
groove passes completely around it about a foot from the top, and
another about a foot from the bottom. The top terminates in a stem-
like projection (pl. 45,6). It looks as though it may have originally
represented a human figure.
CONCLUSION
La Venta is an important and interesting site. It appears to repre-
sent a single occupation. It is hoped that the ceramic studies which
we are now conducting (1942) at the site will result in definitely placing
the heroic type of “Olmec” sculpture in its proper ceramic horizon.
If this can be successfully accomplished it is probable that this horizon
may be related to the ceramic cultural column of Tres Zapotes. The
close similarity of the Colossal Head of Tres Zapotes with the two
largest heads at La Venta should then enable us with some certainty to
place the approximate time of this interesting art. In accordance with
present evidence, this type of sculpture would appear to be early. The
infrequent use of feathers as an art motive seems to be an early trait
in Middle American art. Likewise analogies exist with the art style
of demonstrably early ceramic forms, specifically the “baby-face” heads
such as those recovered by Vaillant at Gualapita in the Mexican High-
lands, and in our excavations at Tres Zapotes; the use of chinstraps on
solid figurines at Tres Zapotes; and the representations of median
crests on the top of the head in early Tres Zapotes figurines similar to
that represented on Monument 5 at La Venta.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 61
IZAPA
This important site, located in the southeastern part of the State of
Chiapas near the Guatemalan border, has been known locally for many
years, but considering its relative accessibility, it is remarkable that
more attention has not been paid to it. It was visited briefly by Karl
Ruppert of the Carnegie Institution in 1938, and the next year by Dr.
A. V. Kidder, but until the visit of the writer in April 1941, no excava-
tions had been conducted there. On this occasion 7 days were spent at
the site with Marion Stirling and Richard Stewart, photographer of
the National Geographic Society. The excavations were confined to
the stone monuments, no mound or stratigraphic excavations being
undertaken. The new highway from Tapachula across the Guate-
malan border passes close to Izapa; in fact, it cuts through the northern
corner of the archeological zone. The site as such has no specific
name locally. The Arroyo Izapa, a tributary of the Suchiate River,
flows generally east of the locality, and the plain on which the site is
located is known as “Los Terrenos de Izapa.” The stream is relatively
small in size and is clear during the dry season. The ground is very
stony and large rocks and boulders are abundant. This fact adds to
the difficulty of locating new monuments, as the natives recognize only
those on which carved decorations show. The soil is fertile and at the
present time milpas of coffee, cacao, and cane are cultivated on the site,
although parts of it are covered with dense second-growth jungle. It
is quite likely that more monuments will be found in these sections.
The stone monuments at Izapa are segregated into six groups, which
for convenience have been designated by letters, although in three in-
stances the “group” consists only of two monuments, if we consider a
stela with its altar as one.
Groups A and B, which contain the majority of the carved stones,
are arranged in quadrangles near the middle of the site, north of the
principal mound. Group C contains six plain stelae with altars, ar-
ranged at the north and south bases of alow mound. An additional,
isolated unexcavated stela (No. 17) has been placed with this group.
In addition to these principal monuments there are scattered here and
there over the site various smooth flat stones which may have served
as altars, and in the section north of the principal mound groups are a
number of large stone mortars (pl. 62, c).
Very few potsherds are evident on the surface of the ground and
they are not especially numerous in the stream bed. Very few sherds
were encountered in the process of excavating the stelae. Such as were
found are of a plain, crude, buff-ccolored ware. Only two figurine frag-
ments were seen and these were not excavated. Both were solid, one a
torso and the other a worn head. The eyes of the latter were modeled,
and not of the punctate type.
62 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [ Buty. 138
There appears to be no true masonry, but there are signs of walls and
structures of boulders, particularly in Groups E and F.
GROUP A
STELA 1
Stela 1 (pl. 49, a) is one of the best preserved at Izapa, and a good
example of the typical art style which falls just short of realism to
the extent that interpretation of details is often difficult. The main
element in the design consists of a standing anthropomorphic figure,
leaning over and grasping a decorated bow! or basket, which rests on
a small stand or altar. The feet of this personage seem to represent
serpents’ heads, and the lower legs have winglike appendages attached,
not unlike a “flying Mercury.” A similar pair of appendages are
attached to the forearms. The face, although somewhat eroded,
appears never to have been very distinct, but seems more animal than
human. The headdress is apparently a serpent’s head. A raised
area in front of the mouth might represent speech, in lieu of a speech
scroll. The figure wears a breechcloth, which also terminates in a
serpentlike head. On his back he carries an olla or basket, with a
constricted neck and flaring rim. The area surrounding this, and
back of the figure, is decorated with a series of rather complicated
scrolls, reminding one of similar decorations on Stela 1 at El Baul,
Guatemala. It compares with page 74 of the Dresden Codex.
The figure is represented as standing on a narrow ledge under which
wavy lines depict water in which two fish are swimming. This
water band terminates at either side with a combination of scrolls
which suggest that this entire strip represents a two-headed monster.
Above the standing figure are two horizontal bands which evidently
represent a highly conventionalized jaguar “mask panel.” The area
above this panel is also covered with a puzzling decoration which
seems intended to confuse the observer. On one side are four small
circles or dots and directly above them another serpent head.
The little stand or altar in the main design area is a type that seems
to be represented on other stelae at Izapa. In form it resembles some-
what the “mountains” or place glyphs of the Mixtec Codices. The
upper portion of this element resembles somewhat a slightly askew
jaguar face. The height of this stela is 76 inches, the greatest width
36 inches, and the average thickness 12 inches.
ALTAR 1
The zoomorphic altar (pl. 59, 6) in front of Stela 1 represents a
crouching animal, evidently a jaguar, although some elements of the
face seem more like a serpent. The style of carving on this altar is
quite reminiscent of that on the so-called “jaguar” stone yokes from
Veracruz.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 63
STELA 2
Stela 2 (pl. 49, 6) contains a well-preserved carving, only the upper
part of the stela having suffered mutilation, which had probably
been the usual much conventionalized “mask panel.” The bottom
element of the design seems to be a plumed serpent with short, arched
body and a 4-plumed tail.
From the top of the serpent head, a gourd tree is growing. At either
side of the tree are two figures in human form, reaching outward and
upward. The upper portion of the main design panel consists of a
“diving bird” with the familiar X-shaped glyph on either wing. If
this design is inverted, it seems to represent a figure in human form,
kneeling and wearing a bird costume with wings and bird-head hel-
met. Unlike Stelae 1 and 3, which accompany it, no altar was found
in front of Stela 2. This stone is 71 inches high, 40 inches wide, and
18 inches in thickness.
STELA 3
The design on this monument (pl. 50, a) shows a figure in human
form brandishing a curved club, while in front of him rises a large,
upturned serpent’s head. In front of the serpent, and filling the space
in the lower left-hand corner, is another design element. The details
of this unit are clear, but it is difficult to tell what is represented. It
looks like an inverted head, wearing an ear disk, the body of which is a
simple heavy scroll.
Above the open mouth of the large serpent head is another curious
element which somewhat resembles a man in a canoe. Above the main
design area is a horizontal band with a broad V-shaped element above
it. In the fork of the V is a rectilineal U-shaped figure. The stela is
67 inches high, 43 inches wide, and 19 inches thick.
ALTAR 2
The altar (pl. 50, a) in front of Stela 3 is a round-eyed, wide-
mouthed, fairly realistic frog. It is 58 inches long, 51 inches wide, and
approximately 18 inches thick.
STELA 4
The design on Stela 4 (pl. 51, @) represents a standing figure with
curiously attenuated feet rather widely separated, standing on a basal
panel of tasteful geometric design. Around his knees and ankles he
wears knotted bands or garters. His left arm is upraised and holds
something, possibly a curved club similar to that represented on Stela 3.
He holds some other object in front of him by the other hand. On his
head is an animal or bird helmet. Behind the figure, apparently
64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLn. 138
attached to an X-shaped glyph, are four large curving plumelike
objects—possibly an elaborate bustle.
Above the standing figure is a “diving bird” closely similar to that
on Stela 2. This figure too, when inverted, seems to represent a kneel-
ing human figure in bird costume. Above this is a conventional
“mask panel” the upper portion of which is the same as that on Stela 3.
This stela is 90 inches high, 33 inches wide, and 24 inches thick.
STELA 5
This curious stela (pl. 52) is the largest and most ambitious in com-
position of any at Izapa. In the intricate design which covers its
broad surface in low relief, 10 figures in human form can be detected,
as well as several birds and fish. The central feature of the design is a
growing tree with eight branches spreading out at the top, and with
the roots extending into a horizontal rectangular panel near the base.
The panel on the left side is decorated with a series of triangles and on
the right by a single horizontal line. Below this panel is a scroll
design, evidently representing water, which carries across the base of
the design and part way up the right-hand side. Seated on the rec-
tangular panel in which the roots are growing, are six figures, three on
each side of the tree. On the left-hand side, a pair are seated facing
each other with a small altar or fire between them. A third figure
seems to be in attendance behind the outside figure of this pair. The
latter seems to be an old man wearing a gnomelike pointed cap and a
circular ear plug. Just behind and above his head is a grotesque face
or mask, quite Maya-like in style. On the right-hand side of the tree
trunk is another similar seated pair, with some object between them.
The right-hand figure of this pair sits with his right arm extended
straight ahead, while in the hand of the slightly flexed left arm he holds
something like a stylus. Behind him another person appears to be
grasping the handle of a parasollike object.
The two principal figures stand facing each other with the tree
between, one just above each of the two seated pairs just described.
The one on the right seems to represent a fat individual wearing a
bead necklace and a large elaborate headdress terminating in a ser-
pent’s head. Just behind him stands a smaller figure dressed in a
skirt and with a high plain headdress. Along the upper margin of
each side of the design area are the two upper elements of the
U-shaped two-headed serpent or monster, as in Stelae 11 and 12. The
heads are elaborately modeled with bared fangs and scrolls on top,
and they face inward. The one on the right has a series of tassels
depending from a circular ornament at the back of the head.
The large figure standing on the left of the tree is puzzling, as the
upper part of his body seems to terminate in a complicated maze.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 65
The figure may, however, be wearing a beaklike mask. A pair of
hummingbirds, with carved beaks probing into the eye of the two-
headed monster, stand one on the shoulder and one on top of the head.
Hanging head down from the upper left-hand corner of the design
are two fish, while in relatively the same position on the right-hand
side is a large bird like a pelican, apparently roosting on the scroll
forming the headdress of the two-headed monster on that side. On
the branches of the tree are leaves and fruit, and possibly other birds
are intended.
Framing the main design above are two horizontal panels with
geometric designs representing the jaguar “mask panel.”
ALTAR 3
This circular altar (pl. 59, a) has carved on it in low relief the figure
of a long-tailed bird with outstretched wings, probably the same as
represented on Stelae 2 and 4.
The bird is represented as roosting on or diving from a rectangular
panel. The greatest diameter of the stone is 60 inches. It is 17 inches
in thickness. From its position, this altar may have been associated
with Stela 7.
MONUMENT 1
This carved stone (pl. 58, 6) located near Group A may have been
an altar. Itis an irregular stone, roughly triangular in shape. At one
corner is carved in low relief the figure of an animal with a long,
curling tail, probably a jaguar. The carving is rather crude and the
surface of the stone is rough, excepting for the body of the animal.
This monument is about 40 inches in diameter.
STELA 6
The design on this stone (pl. 50, 6) represents a sitting, potbellied
jaguar. The head, which is turned directly upward, has a rather
serpentine eye. Directly over the partly open, upturned mouth is a
crescent-shaped object with a circle or large dot just above it. This
is reminiscent of the figure similarly placed on Stela 3. The tail ap-
pears to terminate in an animal head. Behind the seated figure is a
simple series of scrolls.
The stela is 63 inches high, 35 inches wide, and 21 inches thick.
ALTAR 4
The altar (pl. 50, 0) in front of Stela 6, is a plain, fiat, roughly
rounded stone, 59 by 52 inches, and 11 inches thick.
66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buuu. 138
STELA 7
This stela (pl. 51, 0) at one time must have been one of the best
carved at Izapa. Unfortunately, erosion, assisted no doubt by fires,
has scaled off most of the carved surface so that only fragments of
the design remain. In the lower right-hand corner is what appears
to be an inverted serpent head with a crest of the type usually shown
on monkeys. Attached to this is a carving which looks like inter-
twined serpent coils. The figure in the lower left-hand corner
resembles the upturned head of a predatory bird.
This stela is 80 inches high, 51 inches wide, and 18 inches thick.
GROUP B
STELA §
This stela (pl. 58, a), which has fallen on its back, face up, has
suffered considerable weathering. The upper horizontal band evi-
‘dently represents a simplified “mask panel.” Below this is a large,
raised cartouche with beveled edges. This was carved with a design
now unrecognizable. Below this is a series of simple heavy scrolls,
in the midst of which is a barely recognizable, small, standing figure.
The stela is 80 inches high, 31 inches wide, and 16 inches thick.
ALTAR 5
Altar 5 (pl. 58, a), which accompanies Stela 8, is perfectly round,
being 56 inches in diameter and 8 inches thick. The surface now
uppermost is plain, but we did not have the opportunity of turning
it to see if the under side is carved, as its carefully worked state
suggests it might have been.
STELA 9
In its upright position, this massive stone (pl. 56, @) makes the
most impressive appearance of any at Izapa. This is partly owing
to its prominent position and partly to the fact that it is carved from
a white stone. The upper part of the design in two broad horizontal
bands represents the usual conventionalized jaguar “mask panel.”
Below this is a rectangular sunken panel with a design in low relief,
which at first glance looks like an African elephant approaching head
on. Although the details are not clear, it evidently represents a
standing figure facing to the left, holding a curved stick in front of
him. Apparently three long feather plumes depend on either side.
The figure with its stiff slender legs may represent a bird deity
or a warrior in bird costume.
The stela is 83 inches high, 60 inches wide, and 18 inches in
thickness.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 67
ALTAR 6
The altar (pl. 56, a) accompanying Stela 9 is a heavy, flat stone,
roughly rounded. There are 2 or 3 circular depressions on the
surface, like small mortar holes. The altar is broken into two pieces,
which still remain in position, and is 96 by 92 inches in dimension,
and 19 inches thick.
STELA 10
The upper part of the design (pl. 56, 6) consists of the conventional-
ized “mask panel.” On the lower left-hand side of the main design
area is a vertical column which may represent a tree trunk. Leaning
against this in a seated position is a nude human figure. Two smaller
standing figures to the right face the seated figure. Filling the space
between these figures and the mask panel is a series of heavy scrolls
similar in style to those on Stela 8.
The stela is 69 inches high, 38 inches wide, and 13 inches thick.
ALTAR 7
The altar accompanying Stela 10 is a round, fiat stone, 51 by 47
inches, and 11 inches thick.
There are two other small, thick, circular altars near Stela 10.
STELA 11
This stela (pl. 53, 2), which had fallen face downward, was raised
with considerable difficulty. The upper part of the design represents
the conventionalized “mask panel.” Rising on either side at the bot-
tom of the design are the two heads of the double-headed monster or
serpent. Between these is the stylized, seated figure of the fat jaguar
with body in full face, upraised head in profile. This is evidently the
same being represented somewhat more realistically on Stela 6. The
figure between this and the mask panel is rather badly eroded. It
looks as if it might represent a head in profile, facing to the left, with
outstretched arms, and two scrolls rising from each shoulder.
This stela is 72 inches high, 88 inches wide at the base, and 15
inches thick. No altar was found in association with it.
STELA 12
This large stela (pl. 54) is decorated with an unusually interesting
design. The upper part consists of the horizontal panels comprising
the “mask panel” unit. In the two upper corners of the main design
area are the two heads, facing inward, of the double-headed serpent.
Their bodies form a U-shaped panel which borders the central design.
From the scroll-like head crests of the two serpent heads depend two
ropes, from which hangs suspended the limp body of a dead jaguar,
68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 138
with head hanging down and tongue protruding. The body of the
jaguar is draped over a woven object which might represent a mat-
covered altar. Below the jaguar are two seated figures in human form
with some carved object between them. Each of the figures is reach-
ing downward and grasping something like a rope.
The carvings, which appear to the right of the main design area,
are evidently for the purpose of breaking the space formed by the
wide bulge of the stela on that side.
Below the main design area is another panel design which may
represent the lower jaw of the open mouth of the “jaguar monster.”
ALTAR 8
The massive altar in front of Stela 12 measures 82 by 70 inches, and
is approximately 18 inches thick.
MONUMENT 2
This interesting monument (pl. 58, 6), which stands by itself in an
open area between Groups B and C, is unique at the site. It faces
to the south and represents an animal, probably a jaguar, with open
mouth, in which is carved in full relief, more than life-size, a seated
human figure. The legs and arms of this figure have been broken
off, and the head has either been worn smooth or it was intentionally
left by the sculptor in unfinished form. The carving was done in
such a manner that openings passed behind the head and under the
knees of the seated figure. The lower lip of the animal is carved
with simple geometric lines probably representing teeth, and the
cheeks are covered with a series of curious ornaments. Although
this monument was three-quarters buried before we excavated it, it
was sufficiently striking in appearance to be the center of most of
the local superstitions of the region. To the natives the stone is
known as “El Leon,” and it is supposed to be endowed with a guardian
spirit which makes occasional forays at the mystic hour of midnight.
The weird appearance of the monument is considerably augmented
by the contrast between the light color of the protected human figure,
and the black, weather-beaten surface of the animal head. This
stela is 101 inches high, 67 inches wide, and 48 inches thick. The
height of the human figure is 48 inches.
GROUP C
Group C is the northernmost monument group which we found at
the site. The stelae and altars here are all plain, and are placed at
the north and south edges of a broad low mound. Unlike other
stelae at the site, they face toward the mound instead of away from
it.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 69
STELA 13
Like all of the stelae at this group, Stela 13 (pl. 60, a) is plain. The
lower portion, which has been long buried, shows that originally the
surface had been polished smooth. The stela is 58 inches high, 27
inches wide, and 22 inches thick.
ALTAR 9
Altar 9, in front of Stela 13, is squarish in shape, with rounded
corners. It measures 50 inches across, and is 14 inches thick.
STELA 14
This rather squat massive stone (pl. 61, a) had a sunken rectangular
panel carved on its front surface, but if this contained a carved de-
sign, it is now completely effaced. A broad rectangular shallow
eroove runs across the top. The monument is 60 inches high, 46
inches wide, and 35 inches thick. It now leans forward at a steep
angle against its altar.
ALTAR 10
Altar 10, accompanying Stela 14, is roughly circular in form. It
measures 52 inches by 42 inches, and is 18 inches thick.
STELA 15
Stela 15 (pl. 60, c), like its companions, is plain, but contains a
beveled depression on its surface which has been carefully smoothed
to conform with the rest of the surface. Stela 15 is 75 inches high,
46 inches wide, and 29 inches thick.
ALTAR 11
The altar accompanying Stela 15 is a roughly rounded slab of
stone which, apart from smoothing, has not had its natural shape
altered very much. It measures 56 by 75 inches.
STELA 16
This stela (pl. 60, 6), being obviously plain, was not excavated
completely. ‘The portion projecting above the surface of the ground
measures 60 inches in height, 47 inches in width, and 31 inches in
thickness,
ALTAR 12
Altar 12, in front of Stela 16, is an irregularly rounded stone,
measuring 55 by 41 inches, and is 17 inches thick.
70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL 128 |
ALTAR 138
This flat stone (pl. 61, c), irregular in outline, is presumably an |
altar, although at present no stela accompanies it. Carved on its
surface is a shallow T-shaped depression with a groove or drain
leading from it to a natural concavity at one end of the stone. It is
58 inches long and 46 inches wide.
STELA 17
Standing by itself at a distance of 200 yards from Group C in a
northwesterly direction, the upper part of another stela projects
above the surface of the ground (pl. 61,6). This was not excavated
owing to lack of time.
GROUP D
STELA 18
Placed at the southeastern base of a rather large mound, and facing
west, this is the only stela visible at this location. Although a large
area of the upper part of the design (pl. 55, a) has been scaled off,
the lower half is still in rather good condition. The upper part of the
stela is decorated with a conventionalized mask panel.
Seated on each side at the base and facing inward, are two human
figures with a small stand or altar between them. This seems to be
carved in the form of a stylized animal head. The faces are indistinct,
but each is wearing a rather elaborate headdress in contrast to their
almost nude bodies.
Seated behind the right-hand figure and carved on the side of the
stela is a small male human figure (pl. 55, 6) wearing a bead necklace
and a circular ear ornament. He is represented with hands upraised
together in front of his face, as though handling a canoe paddle. On
his head is a crested helmet with an animal head projecting in front.
In a similar position on the opposite side of the stela is a similar
male figure (pl. 55, ¢) also wearing a bead necklace, circular ear orna-
ment, and crested helmet. Decorating the top of this helmet is a
monkey head. The seated figure holds out his hands with palms
upraised.
Below the main design is a horizontal rectangular panel, the simple
design on which is largely obscured by the altar, which contacts it.
ALTAR 14
Altar 14 is placed in front of Stela 18. It is approximately circular
in form and has four broad, shallow depressions worn into its surface.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO i
ALTAR 15
This is a heavy slab of stone which has been rounded on top (pl.
61, @). It is located well up on the southeast shoulder of the mound,
about 15 yards above Stela 18. This stone measures 83 inches in its
greatest dimension and 71 inches in its smallest diameter. It is about
30 inches in thickness.
GROUP B
STELA 19
This stela (pl. 57, a), together with Stela 20, is placed in front of
a small mound near the southern extremity of the site. Near this
mound, and apparently associated with it, are a number of small
boulder-faced, rectangular mounds. The two stelae are about 15 yards
apart and face west. The style of decoration on these two monu-
ments differs considerably from the others on the site. The design
on Stela 19 appears to represent a highly conventionalized face, and
is in a good state of preservation. The stela is 56 inches high, 24
inches wide, and 15 inches thick.
ALTAR 16
The altar in front of Stela 19 is carved with remarkable realism in
the form of a crab (pl. 57, a). It is 49 inches wide, 33 inches long,
and about 14 inches thick.
STELA 20
Stela 20 (pl. 57, 6), like its companion, is carved in the form of a
conventionalized face. Whereas Stela 19 has a horizontal panel of
broad diagonal stripes across the top of the design, Stela 20 has an
exactly similar panel at the bottom. The stela is 53 inches high,
28 inches wide, and 15 inches thick.
ALTAR 17
The altar in front of Stela 20 is circular in form, being 49 inches
in diameter at its greatest width. It is about 10 inches thick.
GROUP F
About 1 mile north of the main site of Izapa is a detached mound
group, just north of the road between Tuxtla Chico and Tapachula.
The principal mound of this group, according to local superstition,
is inhabited by a guardian spirit which shares honors with that of
Monument 2. A number of the mounds of this group are faced
72 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuLL. 138
with boulders, and there are several rectangular boulder structures
like the remains of walls or foundations. The general type of the
mounds and the appearance of the two carved monuments seem to
set this unit apart from the main site of Izapa.
MONUMENT 3
This is a stone 82 inches long and 32 inches wide, carved in the form
of a serpent’s head (pl. 60, d@). A hollow opening runs through the
mouth and continues into a troughlike tenon, which projects at the
rear. The snakelike appearance of this head is much more striking
than the photographs show.
MONUMENT 4
This is a long, slender column, rectangular in cross section. The
base expands into a bulblike form, and the remainder tapers grad-
ually toward the other end, where the simple decorative carving ap-
pears. It evidently represents a phallus. The length is 112 inches,
it is 30 inches in thickness at the base, while the rectangular portion
averages 18 inches (pl. 62, a, 0).
CONCLUSION
Because of its size and location, Izapa is a particularly significant
site. The art style of the stelae bears a close resemblance to that on
Stela 1 at El Baul, Guatemala, and to the stelae recently discovered
by Eric Thompson at San Isidro Piedra Parada in the same region.
Since one of these, as well as Stela 1 at El Baul, contained an Initial
Series date, it offers the possibility of cross-dating Izapa, or the more
interesting possibility that further exploration at Izapa may reveal
dates at this site. If the Baktun 7 dates from southern Guatemala
should actually be contemporary dates in the same calendar as used
by the Maya, the implication would be that Izapa is a very early
site. Certain features would tend to bear this out. However, of
fundamental importance in this respect will be a study of the ceram-
ics. The paucity of sherds and figurine material encountered in the
course of superficial digging at the site has already been commented
upon. It is probable that the habitation level of the site is rather
deeply buried. The few nondescript sherds seen were of little value
in suggesting a time period. The two worn figurine fragments were
ofthe solid variety, which hints at their being early. This scant
evidence is, however, of little value.
In general Izapa appears to be much more closely related to the
earth-mound sites of southern Veracruz and the Isthmus of Tehuan-
tepec, than it does with sites in the Maya area. The use of altars
in front of stelae is a trait characteristic of some Maya sites. In
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 73
the Veracruz—Tehuantepec region, the only instance of a stela with
altar encountered by us was stela C at Tres Zapotes.
In the light of present incomplete information, the stone art of
the Izapa—San Isidro style seems related in some respects to the early
stone art of the southeastern Mexican coastal area, and in other respects
to early Maya art, yet it is sufficiently distinct to stand by itself. The
designs are made to stand out in low relief, the background being
cut away. The art itself is definitely impressionistic, complete realism
being studiously avoided. Scrolls and curving lines are generously
used, a feature resembling Maya art more closely than that of south-
eastern Mexico.
Sites with stelae decorated in the Veracruz—Tehuantepec style exist,
among other places, in the vicinity of Tonala, Chiapas. Standing
figures in profile are represented as wearing gorgets in the form of
“Olmec”-like heads. In at least one instance, that of a stela which has
been moved to the town of Tonala, a bar and dot numeral is repre-
sented. Much work remains to be done in this general area. In the
light of present evidence, the general fact appears to stand out that
there was an early spread of a stela cult extending from the south-
eastern Mexican coast across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec to the Pacific
coast region of southern Mexico, and possibly into Guatemala. The
use of large earth mounds including long mounds placed in a rather
unsystematic manner, and the general absence of stone masonry and
architectural features, were characteristic. It seems probable that in
part, at least, this development preceded the conspicuous growth of the
classic Maya culture, which was to a considerable degree influenced
by it. The use of bar and dot numerals is to be found in this area from
coast to coast, including the use of the Initial Series in Veracruz and
the Pacific slope of Guatemala. The carving of calendar dates or of
bar and dot numerals on stone monuments was of relatively rare
occurrence. ‘There are two or probably three instances of Initial Series
at Cerro de las Mesas, one at Tres Zapotes, one at Baul, and one at
San Isidro. Bar and dot numerals of a different type likewise occur at
Monte Alban and Tonala, sites characterized by the use of masonry.
Their absence on stone monuments at other related sites does not neces-
sarily indicate that they were not used on other media. At La Venta
and Izapa numerals do not occur on any of the monuments as yet
discovered. If the Initial Series occurring in this area represent con-
temporary dates, it would seem probable that the long-count calendar
was used here prior to its adoption in the Maya area proper.
While a related early cultural spread is indicated for the area extend-
ing from southern Guatemala through Veracruz, it is not necessary to
postulate that a single people or linguistic group is involved. As yet
there is not much direct evidence to indicate the direction of this cul-
516040—43_—6
74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY (Bou. 138
tural flow. It is interesting to note that the culture is primarily one
of the tropical lowlands. Present none-too-adequate archeological
information suggests that the early related ceramic horizons were two-
fold in nature. One of these followed the coastal lowlands on both the
Atlantic and Pacific sides, crossing by way of the Isthmus of Tehuan-
tepec, while the other followed the highlands from Guatemala to the
Mexican mesa central. While the exact nature of these movements
awaits a more complete study of the ceramic remains, the stone monu-
ments offer many suggestions towards the solution of the problem,
which is basic to an understanding of Middle American archeology.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANDREWS, EB. W.
1939. A group of related sculptures from Yucatan. Carnegie Inst. Wash-
ington Publ. No. 509, pp. 67-79.
ARCHIVO GENERAL DE LA NACION, Volumen 70 del Ramo de Tierras, Legajo 1: No.
1—afio de 1600, Cosamaloapa, Tlacotalpa, Guaspaltepec y Amatlin—proceso
de congregacién.
Biom, F. F., and La FARGE, O.
1926. Tribes and temples. Tulane Univ. Middle Amer. Res. Ser., vol. 1.
New Orleans.
Caso, A.
1928. Las Estelas Zapotecas. Monogr. Mus. Nac. Arquel., Hist. y Htnog.
Mexico, D. F.
CHARNAY, DESIRE
1887. The ancient cities of the New World. New York.
Diaz DEL CASTILLO, BERNAL
1928. The discovery and conquest of Mexico, 1517-21. Trans. by A. P.
Maudslay. New York and London.
DRUCKER, PHILIP
[In press.] Ceramic sequences at Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico. Bur.
Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 140.
[In press.] Ceramic stratigraphy at Cerro de las Mesas, Varacruz, Mexico.
Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 141.
FEWKES, J. W.
1907. Certain antiquities of eastern Mexico. 25th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer,
Ethnol., 1903-1904, pp. 221-284.
FRIEDLAENDER, I., and SoNDER, R. A. ;
1924. Uber das Vulkangebiet von San Martin Tuxtla in Mexiko. Zeitschr.
Vulkanologie, vol. 7, pp. 162-187, 1923-1924. Hamburg.
Hay, C. L., Linton, R. L., Lorurop, S. K., SHapizo, H. L., and VAILLant, G. C., Ed.
1940. The Maya and their neighbors. New York.
HOLMES, W. H.
1907. On a nephrite statuette from San Andrés Tuxtla, Vera Cruz, Mexico.
Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 9, pp. 691-701.
Joycr, T. A.
1931. Sculptured figures from Vera Cruz State, Mexico. Man, vol. 31, No. 17.
London.
KERBER, HDMUND.
1882. Eine alte Mexikanische Ruinenstiitte bei S. Andrés Tuxtla. Zeitschr.
Ethnol., vol. 14, pp. 488-489. Berlin.
STIRLING] STONE MONUMENTS OF SOUTHERN MEXICO 75
Kipper, ALFRED, 11. See STRONG, WILLIAM DUNCAN, et al.
KRICKEBERG, WALTER
1983. Los Totonaca: Contribucién a la etnografia hist6érica de la America
Central. Traducido por Porfirio Aguirre. Mexico City.
KRoOEBER, A. L. .
1989. Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Univ. Calif.
Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 38, p. 1-242. Berkeley.
La Farcx, O. See Blom, F. F.
Linton, R.L. See Hay, C. L., et al.
Loturop, 8. K. See Hay, C. L., et al.
MEZLGAR, J. M.
1869. Antigiiedades Mexicanas. Bol. Soc. Mex. Geog. y Estadistica, 2 ep.,
vol. 1, pp. 292-297. Mexico, D. F.
1871. Estudio sobre la antigiiedad y el origen de la Cabeza Colosal de tipo,
etidpico que existe en Hueyapam. Bol. Soc. Mex. Geog. y Estadistica,
2 ep., vol. 3, pp. 104-109. Mexico, D. F.
Meyer, EH. H. See PAwacios, E. J.
Mozino, JOSEPH
1913. Descripcién dei Volcan de Tuxtla, in: Noticias de Nutka...y
Descripcion del Volean de Tuxtla. Soc. Mex. Geog. y Hstadistica.
Mexico, D. F.
Paxacios, HE. J.. and MEYER, E. HE.
1932. La ciudad arqueolégica del Tajin. Bibl. estud. hist. y arqueol. Mexi-
canos, vol. I. Mexico, D. F.
Paso ¥ TRONCOSO, F’. DEL
1905. Papeles de Nueva Espana, vol. 5: Relaciones de la didécesis de Tlaxcala.
Mexico, D. F.
PAuL, A. J. DREXEL, Jk. See STRONG, WILLIAM DUNCAN, ET AL.
Rick arps, C. G.
1910. The ruins of Mexico. London.
SELER, E.
1906. Die Monumente von Huilocintla im Canton Tuxpan des Staates Vera
Cruz. Proce. Int. Congr. Amer., 15th sess., vol. 2. Quebec.
SmLer-Sacus, C.
1922. Altertumer des Kanton Tuxtla im Staate Vera Cruz. Festschr. Eduard
Seler, pp. 548-556. Stuttgart.
SHapIro, H. L. See Hay, C. L., et al.
SPINDEN, E. S.
1933. The place of Tajin in Totonac archeology. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 35,
pp. 225-270.
SpPINDEN, H. J.
1927. “Study dead city of ‘Rubber People.’”” New York Times, Sunday, May
at TATE
StrrLine, M. W.
1939. Discovering the New World’s oldest dated work of man. Nat. Geogr.
Mag., vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 183-218. Aug.
1940 a. An Initial Series from Tres Zapotes, Vera Cruz, Mexico. Nat. Geogr.
Soe. Contr. Tech. Pap., Mexican Archeol. Ser., vol. 1, No. 1.
1940 b. Great stone faces of the Mexican jungle. Nat. Geogr. Mag., vol. 78,
No. 3, pp. 309-334. Sept.
1941. Expedition unearths buried masterpieces of carved jade. Nat. Geogr.
Mag., vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 278-302. Sept.
76 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Butr. 138
Stretine, M. W.—Continued.
1942. Finding jewels of jade in a Mexican swamp. Natl. Geogr. Mag., vol. 82,
No. 5. Nov.
STREBEL, H.
1885-1889. Alt-Mexiko. Archiologische Beitrage zur Kulturgeschichte seiner
Bewohner, 2 vols. Hamburg u. Leipzig.
Strong, WILLIAM DuncAN; Kipper, ALFRED, IIT; and PAUL, A. J. DREXEL, JR.
1938. Preliminary report on the Smithsonian Institution—Harvard University
archeological expedition to northwestern Honduras, 1936. Smith-
sonian Mise. Coll., vol. 97, No. 1.
TuHompson, J. E. [S.]
1940. Archaeological problems of the Lowland Maya. In The Maya and their
neighbors, pp. 126-138. ‘
1941. Dating of certain inscriptions of non-Maya origin. Theoretical ap-
proaches to problems, No. 1. July. Div. Hist. Res., Carnegie Inst.
Washington.
VAGELER, P.
1933. An introduction to tropical soils. Trans. by H. Greene. London.
VAILLANT, G. C.
1941. The Aztecs of Mexico. New York.
See aiso Hay, C. L., et al.
WATERMAN, T. T.
1924, On certain antiquities in Western Guatemala. Pan. Amer. Union Bull,
vol. 58, No. 4.
1929. Is the Baul Stela an Aztec imitation? Art and Archaeol. vol. 28, No. 5.
WEIANT, C. W.
[In press.] An introduction to the ceramics of Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico.
Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 139.
WEYERSTALL, A.
1932. Some observations on Indian Mounds, idols, and pottery in the lower
Papaloapan basin, State of Vera Cruz, Mexico. Tulane Univ., Middle
Amer. Res. Ser., vol. 4, pp. 28-69. New Orleans.
|
|
|
‘SS 1LOdVZ SSAYL AO SOVTTIA SHL
PSE al die Gila INE tel an eet ASONONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVvVaYNSa
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 2
a, VIEW SHOWING TYPICAL SLOUGH IN THE LOWER PAPALOAPAN BASIN.
b, GENERAL VIEW OF GROUP 2, SHOWING STELA A IN THE FOREGROUND.
LEFT BACKGROUND SHOWS THE LONG MOUND. TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 3
THE LONG MOUND. TRES ZAPOTES.
a, THE PRINCIPAL MOUND OF GROUP 2.
“QVAH IWSSO1O0D AHL AO MAIA YVAN “49
> My
valvid 8s€! NILS1T1INa
ASOTIONHLA NVYOIYAWY AO NVaYyNa
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 5
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ET HNOLOG Y
TRES ZAPOTES.
MONUMENT C, SIDE A: THE CARVED STONE Box.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
a, MONUMENT C, SIDE B. b, MONUMENT C, SIDE C.
TRES ZAPOTES.
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 6
c, MONUMENT C, SIDE D.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE7
i
ae aS
» “aay ~ 4 ‘
ey
a, MONUMENT B, PLAIN STONE BOX. 6b, STELAB. c, STELA E.
TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 8
ae
we
a, MONUMENT F. b, MONUMENT G. c, UNDER SIDE OF MONUMENT G.
TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BUIEEETIN 188) PEATE YS
a, MONUMENT |, FRONT VIEW. 6, MONUMENT |, REAR VIEW. cc, MONUMENTS
JAND K. TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 10
a, MONUMENT N. 6, MONUMENT D. c, MONUMENT H. TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULPEEGRINGISS = ee Agnes Til
a, MONUMENT L.
VIEW.
*
b, MONUMENT M, FRONT VIEW. c, MONUMENT M, SIDE
d, MONUMENT M, REAR VIEW. TRES ZAPOTES.
“‘SHLOdVZ SAYL “M3AIA AGIS ‘VY VIALS 49 ‘SHLOdVZ SAUL “VY VIFLS ‘2
Aebh/arel cys) INCE iaiatsl ASOTNONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVSaHNSa
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 13
a, STONE ARM FROM LA PUENTE. b, STONE PLATFORM. TRES ZAPOTES.
“AGIS HLYON ‘GC YI1SLS 2
vl 3Siv1d 8€!1 NiILSaTIng
‘sojode7 Sol],
“ACIS HLNOS ‘Gq VIALS “9
“MAlIA LNOYS °G VIALS ‘2
A
é.
ASOVONH LA NVOIMSAWY JO NvaYuNnE
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
a. CURVED STAIRWAY OF SANDSTONE FLAGS.
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 15
b, STONE JAGUAR FROM TLAPA-
COYA. c, STONE COLUMN. d, STONE-LINED FIRE PIT. TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMER:‘CAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 16
a, CARVED STELA OF COLUMNAR BASALT NEAR EL MESON. 6b, STONE WITH PET-
ROGLYPHS, SAN JUAN RIVER. c, STONE HEAD FROM SAN MARCOS. d, JAGUAR
INCISED ON STONE NEAR LIRIOS. TRES ZAPOTES.
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 17
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
i
i
q
}
j
j
{
\
ide B.
s
c}
b
MONUMENT C.
TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 18
a, Side C.
”
b, Side D.
MONUMENT C. TRES ZAPOTES.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 19
&
4 A as a
a, VIEW OF EXPEDITION CAMP AT CERRO DE LAS MESAS SITE. b, VIEW OF THE
MONUMENT PLAZA AFTER EXCAVATION, CERRO DE LAS MESAS.
*SBSOT\] SV] Op O1IOD
‘yl WIALS 2 A N/MM uss 7 "| WIALS “9
Oc 31V1d 8&! NILSA11NaG ASOTONH LA NVODINAWY AO NVaHNa
)
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 21
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
b. STELA 4. c. STELA 9.
Cerro de las Mesas.
a, STELA 3.
ec 31V1d 8&1 NILATINGA
“SVSAW SV140 ONYAD
+.)
"Gl WIALS “9
"G VWIALS ‘0
ADSDONONHLS NVOIMAWY AO NvaHna
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 23
STELA 6. CERRO DE LAS MESAS.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 24
oie
sot Rig. ty
STELA 8. CERRO DE LAS MESAS.
SVSaeIAN SV ad SGOuss D>) Thi Vala Sd sO) Valsts?
S@¢AlvW1d 8€!1 NILS37T1INaA e ASONIONHLA NVODIYAWY 4AO NVAYNSG
9g A1V1d 8€! NILATINGA
“SVSAW SV71 30 O8NAD
“LWIALS SLHSIYN * 2 LNAWNNOW ‘14374
ADONIONHLA NVOIMAWY AO NVaHNSs
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 27
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
5b, MONUMENT 2, BACK.
a, STELA 138.
Cerro de las Mesas.
“SVSAW SV1430 OYNSD “SMAIA OM LS LNAWNNOW
Sco Evia! sal Nic Sanimaine ASOTONH LA NVOIYAWY SAO NVAYNAa
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 29
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
CERRO DE LAS MESAS.
MONUMENT 1, TWO VIEWS.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 30
a, MONUMENT 7. 6, MONUMENT 4. c, MONUMENT 8. d, MONUMENT 3. CERRO
DE LAS MESAS.
1€ ALW1d
sel NILA 1T1INa
&
ZLW1ALS
suerte
4
q
“SBSOT\ SP] AP O19)
z LNSWANO'-W
7)
5
eee
ADOTNONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVaYna
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 32
a, VIEW OF THE SWAMP BETWEEN LA VENTA AND THE BLASILLO RIVER.
b, THE VILLAGE OF LA VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 33
c
(IShelLA lb. ShEEA 5S. (ic STELA A. dd; SHELAA, SHOWING SCORINGS ON
BASE. lA VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 34
a, STELA 2, SOUTH SIDE. b, STELA 2, NORTH SIDE. LA VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 35
STELA 3. LA VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 36
SaPr
ars? Me
gt
a, ALTAR 1, FRONT. b, ALTAR 1, NORTH SIDE. ¢, ALTAR 1,
SOUTH SIDE. LA VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 37
a, ALTAR 4, FRON
+
. b, ALTAR 4, SOUTH SIDE. LA VENTA.
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 38
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 39
a, ALTAR 3, FRONT. 6, ALTAR 3, WEST SIDE. LA VENTA.
“VWLNAA V1 LNOYUSY GCG YVL1IY
é ae Ter
Ov ALV1d 8&1 NILATING ASOTONHLA NVOIMAWY AO NVSA4NSa
“VWINAA V1 “ON HLYON (GS YV1L1V “Y SONS HLNOS ‘SG YVI1Iy 2
ly S31V1d 8€! NILATING ASOTONHL]A NVOIYAWY AO NVvAYNa
“BUDA PT
“€ LNAWNNOW 4 “| LNAWNNOW
tv 31iVv1d 8&€! NiItSA7ING ASDOIONHL]A NVOIYaWY JO Nvayena
“WINSA V1 “LNOYS 2 LNAWNNOW “4 “SO0IS ‘2 LNAWNNOW “2
fv 31V1d 8&1 NILATINA ADOTIONHLA NVOIMAWY AO NVAYNSG
“BUDA ey
“Mov ‘vy LNAWNNOW “49 “LNOYY ‘vy LNAWNNOW
vy SLiV1d 8&€! NitS71INa ASOTONH LA NVOISAWYV AO NVAYNS
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 45
a, MONUMENT 5. 6b, STONE COLUMN AT BASE OF CERRO ENCANTADO. LA
VENTA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 46
a, NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STONE ENCLOSURE, PARTIALLY EXCAVATED.
b, LARGE STONE COLUMN ON THE SOUTH END OF THE LONG MOUND. LA
VENTA.
“BUI A ery
“QSAOWSY GIT SHL
“OaeYO1LSSY NOISSG ‘9 LNAWNNOW 30 GNA HLYON ‘49 dO LYVd HLIM SNOVHdOONVS ANOILS 3HIL °9 LINAWNNOW ~?
f4vy3aivid 8€! NiILa71Ina ASOTONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVaYHNEa
WINSA V1 ‘Y¥VveyH AHL NI WYOSLV Id WINN ANOLSAWIT DNIMOHS
NOILVAVOX9 YS14AV GWOL ANOLS “¢ “AONVYLNA HLYON SHL ONISONID SNWN10D SH1L AO IWAOWSY 3YOSRG AWOL ANOLS Y “£ LNAWNNOW
8r 31V1d 8€l NILSATING ASOIONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVSaHnNSs
6y Sivld 8&1 NiLta71INaA
“¢ VW1IS1S 49
“edez]
alte Ae btS)
ADOIONH1L]A NVOIMAWY AO NV3AHNG
‘yp UVLIV GNV 9 VISLS “9
OS A31V1d 8€! NILATING
“edez]
"2 YVLIV GNV € VIFLS “2B
ASOTONHLA NVDIYAWY 4AO NVAYNSaA
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOG Y BULLETIN 138 PLATE 51
a, STELA 4. 6,STELA7. IZAPA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 52
STELA 5. IZAPA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 53
Ge SuEEAy lili b, MONUMENT 2.
Izapa.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 54
STELA 12. IZAPA.
“edez]
“ACIS HLNOS ‘81 V1aLS ¥ “ACIS HLYON ‘81 V1SLS 4 “LNOYS ‘81 VISLS
SG3A1V1d 8€! NILS71NaA
*edezy
SOL VIALS “9 “9 YVINIV GNV 6 V1S1S °7
9S ALV1d 8€! NILATINA ASOTONHL]A NVOIMAWY AO NVsANNa
Ve ihtsh/tt Ord \/ AS USs 7) “Ol YVL1IV ‘61 VIALS
4S 31V1d 8€1 NILATING ASOTONHLA NVDIYAWY AO NVAYNSG
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 58
a, STELA 8, ALTAR 5. b, MONUMENT 1. IZAPA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY
a, ALTAR 3.
b, ALTAR 1.
BULLETIN 138 PLATE 59
IZAPA.
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 60
a, STELA 13, ALTAR 9. b, STELA 16, ALTAR 12. ce, STELA 15, ALTAR 11.
d. MONUMENT 3. IZAPA,
Wek iz4ih Se Shae Ass) Chee ee? O72 vate SS Poy tea eZ i ate Sy 2
19 31iv1d 8€! NILA1T1NE ASOTONHLA NVOIMAWY AO NVAYNSE
BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 138 PLATE 62
a AND b, MONUMENT 4.
|
:
:
}
f
\
i
INDEX
Altars, Izapa, descriptions of:
Altar 1, 62
Altar 2, 63
Altar 3, 65
Altar 4, 65
Altar 5, 66
Altar 6, 67
Altar 7, 67
Altar 8, 68
Altar 9, 69
Altar 10, 69
Altar 11, 69
Altar 12, 69
Altar 13, 70
Altar 14, 70
Altar 15, 71
Altar 16, 71
Altar 17, 71
Altars, La Venta, 52-56
Altar 1, description, 52
Altar 2, description, 53
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
Altar 3, description, 53
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
Altar 4, comparisons, 54, 55
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
picture of in Joyce note, 49
Altar 5, comparisons, 53, 54
description, 55
Altar 6, description, 56
Alvarado, Bay of, 8, 31
Alvarado, reference to excursion of, into
Central America, 5
Alvarado, Rio de, 6
Alvarado, Veracruz, similarity of stela
of to monument near El Meson, 3
Animal head, carved design, 34, 46
headdress, 42, 63
Archeological remains,
composition of, 10
Arroyo de la Sierra, 29
Arroyo Hueyapan, 8, 24
Arroyo Izapa, 61
Arroyo La Puente, 26
Arroyo San Juan, 27
“Baby-face” fgures, 58, 59
jade, 53
heads, 60
type from La Venta, 4
Baktun 7 date, Stela C, Tres Zapotes, 22
Bar and dot numerals, 14, 21-22
on Stela 6, Cerro de las Mesas, 36
sites where found, 73
516040—43——_7
Tres Zapotes,
Basalt, columnar, carved stela of near
EF] Meson, 28-29
Colossal Head of Tres Zapotes
carved from, 16
head of, at San Marcos, 27
Stela D, Tres Zapotes, carved from,
14
stelae at Cerro de las Mesas carved
from, 47
stela of Alvarado made of, 3
tomb of, 49, 59
Tuxtla-San Martin region probable
source of, 50
hypothesis of method of trans-
portation from, 50
use of, 50
Baul, see HE! Baul.
Bay of Alvarado, see Alvarado, Bay of.
Bird design, stone monuments, 63, 64
hummingbird, 65
Blasillo River, 48
Blom, F. F., first description of La Ven-
ta by, 49
numbers given by to La Venta stone
monuments retained by Stirling,
49
on provenience of stone figures in
Villa Hermosa, 49
refers to Stela 3, La Venta, as
Stela 1, 52
Boca de San Miguel, 5
SBorrow-pit, Cerro de las Mesas, 32
Tres Zapotes, 11
Burnt Mounds Group, Tres Zapotes, 17,
Pile Pah Oil
Cabeza Colosal de Hueyapan, 7
referred to by Melgar, 7
Calendar dates, see Initial Series; Bar
and dot numerals.
Calendar, long-count, 73
Calendar system, Maya,
carving connected with, 1
Campeche, salt imported from, 6
Carnegie Institution of Washington, 61
Caso, Dr. Alfonso, 4
Cassedy, Edwin G., 2, 4
Catemaco, 5
Central America, influence of culture of,
on early Tres Zapotes, 5
Ceramic horizons, discussion of, 73-74
Cerro de Gallo, mound group, Cerro de
las Mesas, 28, 31, 32
monument
77
78
Cerro de las Mesas, Veracruz, Mexico,
31-48
archeological site of, 31
excavation of, 3
earth mounds of, compared with
those of La Venta, 48
geographical location, 31
physical features of, 31
route to, 32
Initial Series at, 73
monuments, 44-47
See also Monuments, Cerro de
las Mesas.
mound groups, ceremonial center
for region, 32
description, 31-32
possibly place of origin of ‘““Chapul-
tepec Stone,” 4
stelae, 33-44
See also Stelae, Cerro de las
Mesas.
“tiger mask” panel, decorative mo-
tive on stelae at, 3
unworked stones at, 47
Cerro Hneantado, La Venta, 49, 56, 60
stone column at base of, 60
“Chapultepec Stone,’ compared with
stela 5, Cerro des las Mesas, 3, 35
compared with Stelae 6 and 8, Cer-
ro de las Mesas, 42
provenience of discussed, 4
Charnay, Désiré, quoted on La Venta
site, 49
Chiapas, State of, 3, 61
Chronology, relative, of stone monu-
ments at Cerro de las Mesas, 47
Citlaltepetl, 31
Cocuite, village of, 32, 47
location of Monument 8, Cerro de
las Mesas, 47
Colossal Head of Tres Zapotes,
16-17, 31
compared with La Venta head, 49,
56, 60
Colossal stone head, in region west of
Maya area, 3
heads, La Venta, 57, 58
Columbia, reference to stone monuments
of, 1
Columnar basalt, see Basalt, columnar.
Columns, round, Tres Zapotes, 25
Cortés, Hernan, 4
reference to excursion of, into Cen-
tral America, 5
Covarrubias, Miguel, 4
Coyol, mound group, Cerro de las Me-
sas, 31
Cozumalhualpa, see Santa Lucia Cozu-
malhualpa.
“Danzante” figures of Monte Alban, com-
pared with Monument 5, Cerro de las
Mesas, 47
Designs on stone monuments:
animal head, 34, 46
headdress, 42, 63
bird, 68, 64
hummingbird, 65
i
INDEX
Designs on stone monuments—Con.
fish, 62, 64, 65
frog, 63
human figure, 3, 138, 14, 18, 19, 20,
23, 24, 29, 33, 34, 35, 41, 42, 44,
45, 50, 51, 58, 54, 55, 56, 63, 64, 66
jaguar, face, 42, 50, 54, 62
figure, 26, 80, 59, 62, 65, 67, 68
headdress, 44
head with open mouth, 3, 14, 50
man, 52
mask panel, 34, 41, 62, 65, 66
monkey, head, 70
open jaguar mouth, 54, 55, 68
plumed serpent, 18, 34, 35, 42, 63
serpent’s head, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 72
Drucker, Dr. Philip, assistant archeol-
ogist, National Geographie Society-
Smithsonian Institution archeological
expedition, 2
geological and topographical data
on Tres Zapotes region assembled
by, 4
sr aie monuments discovered by,
9
Dunn, EE. R., 32
EKarth-mound sites, in Isthmus of Te-
huantepec, relation of to Izapa site, 72
in southern Veracruz, relation of to
Izapa site, 72
Earth mounds of La Venta, compared
with those of southern Veracruz, 48
El Baul, Guatemala, Initial Series at,
(P3783
Stela 1, 62
compared with art style of
Izapa stelae, 72
“El Leon,” native ndme for Monument
2 at Izapa, 68
El Meson, important center in aborigi-
nal times, 30
monument of, similar to Alvarado
stela, 3
stela of columnar basalt near, 28-29
use of columnar basalt at, 50
WH] Paso, Mexico, 27
“Ethiopian” features, identified with Ol-
mec style of art, 7
Exposicién Histérico-Americana, 7
Figurines, “laughing face” type, proven-
ience of, 32
Vigures, carved human, see Designs on
stone monuments.
Fire pit, stone, Tres Zapotes, 26
Forbes, D. McH., 32
Frog, stone altar in shape of, 63
Geography of archeological
southern Mexico:
Cerro de las Mesas, 31
Izapa, 62
La Venta, 48
Tres Zapotes, 8-11
Giant head, see Cabeza Colosal; Colos-
sal Head of Tres Zapotes.
Glyph column on Stela 6, Cerro de las
Mesas, 35
sites,
INDEX
Greenstone, deity of, worship of in
Tlacotalan, in pre-Conquest times, 6
Grijalva, Juan de, 5
Groups of mounds, see Mound groups.
Gualapita, 60
Guatemala, 73, 74
Guazaqualeo (Coatzealco), Tuxtla war
with, 6
Hacienda San Pedro de Aguirrez, 26
Head flattening, practiced in Tuxtla, in
pre-Conquest times, 6
Head of modified ‘“Totonaec” style, Salto
Barranca, 28
Heads, stone, see Cabeza Colosal ; Colos-
sal heads; Designs on stone monu-
ments.
Hueyapan, Hacienda de, 4, 7
village of, 7
Huilocintla, Veracruz, monument from
representing Quetzalcoatl, reference
LOM
Ignacio Llave, 32
Incised Black ware, 31
Initial Series, sites where found, 73
Cerro de las Mesas, 73
on Stela 5, 35
on Stela 6, 38-39
on Stela 8, 41-42
on Stela 15, 44
HI! Baul, 72, 73
San Isidro, 73
Tres Zapotes, 73
on Stela C, 14
Tnstituto Juarez, 49
Isthmus of Tehuantepec, sce Tehuan-
tepec, Isthmus of.
Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico, 61-74
altars of, descriptions, 62, 63, 65, 66,
(BUG ley AS Tale
See also Altars, Izapa.
archeological site of, 61
age of, 72
excavations at, 3
relation of-earth-mound sites
in Isthmus of Tehuantepec
toy %2
relation of earth-mound sites in
southern Veracruz to, 72
geographical location of, 61
monuments, 65, 68, 72
See also Monuments, Izapa.
paucity of sherds and figurines at,
stelae of, descriptions, 62, 63, 64, 65,
66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72.
“tiger mask” panel, decorative
motive on, 3
See also Stelae, Izapa.
stone art of, relation with other
areas, 73
stone monuments of, division into
six groups, 61
Group A, 62-66
Group B, 66-68
majority of carved stones
contained in Groups A
and B, 61.
79
Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico—Continued.
stone monuments of, division into
six groups—Continued.
Group C, 68-70
six plain stelae with altars
contained in, 61
Group D, 60-71
Group BH, 71
Group F, 71-72
signs of walls found
Groups E and F, 62
See also Monuments, Izapa.
Izapa-San Isidro, stone art of, relation
of with other areas, 73
Jade, “baby-face” figures in, 53
beads, found in front of Altar 4,
La Venta, 55
Jaguar being, worship of,
area, 3
face, 42, 50, 54, 62
figure, 14, 26, 30, 42, 59, 62, 65, 67, 68
headdress, 44
head with open mouth, 8, 14, 50
incised on stone near Lirios, 30
man, 52
mask panel, 34, 41, 50, 62, 65, 66
stone, from Tlapacoya, 26
stone yokes, from Veracruz, com-
pared with Altar 1, Izapa, 62
Jaguars, anthropomorphic, La Venta, 51
Joaquin, 32
Joyce, T. A., publication by, on La Ven-
ta, 49
Kidder, Dr. A. V., 61
King vulture, effigy head of, 18
Kirchhoff, Prof. Paul, 6
Knox, H. A., 49
La Florida, stone figure reported near,
29
Laguna Colorado, 29
La Previdencia, 27
La Puente, description of mound group
at, 26
La Sierra, mound group near, 29
La Venta, Tabasco, Mexico, 48-60
altars, 52-56
archeological! site of, 48
excavations at, 3
geography of, 48
chronological position of, 60
earth mounds of, compared with
those of southern Veracruz, 48
Island, 50
monuments, 56-58, 59
See also Monuments, La Venta.
physical type, see Olmec.
stelae, 50-52
See also Stelae, La Venta.
stone columns, 60
enclosure, 59
“tiger mask” panel, decorative mo-
tive on stelae at, 3
use of columnar basalt at, 50
Lerdo, 28
in
in Maya
80
Lirios, 16, 28
jaguar incised on stone near, 30
petroglyphs on large boulder near,
30
Long Mound, Tres Zapotes, 24, 25
Los Pajaros, mound group, Cerro de las
Mesas, 31
“Los Terrenos de Izapa,” 61
Los Tuxtlas, 8
Macuile, 27
Marquina, Arquitecto Ignacio, 4
Masonry, none found at Izapa, 62
Maya area, 1
calendar system in, monument cary-
ing connected with, 1
cities, Old Empire, 4
sites of, relation of to Izapa site, 72
Maya art, early, relation of to Izapa-
Isidro style, 73
Maya, Lamat sign as used by, 42
pre-Columbian, plan for study of
relationship of with other Mid-
dle American cultures, 1
Melgar, J. M., quoted on Colossal Head
of Tres Zapotes, 17
reference by to a cabeza colosal, 7
Mexican codices, reference to, 48
Mexican Highlands, 69
Mexicano, a language of early Tres Za-
potes region, 6
Mexican Plateau area, stone boxes of, 21
Plateau, influence of cultures of on
early Tres Zapotes, 5
Mexico City, 5
Mexico, Valley of, 1, 4, 5
Mimendi family, 4
Mistlin (early),
language in, 7
Mixtee Codices, design on Stela 1, Izapa,
compared with, 62
glyph, reference to, 41
-speaking groups in early Tres
Zapotes, 7
spoken in early Cozumalhualpa, 7
tribe, reference to, 7
“Mixtequilla” the, archeological site of
Cerro de las Mesas, 31, 32
Monkey head, stone carving, 70
stone image, 46
Monte Alban, 47, 73
Montezuma, tribute received from town
of Veracruz in 15th century, 5
Monuments, stone, Cerro del las Mesas,
44 A7
Monument 1, carved hemisphere,
chronological position of, 48
description, 44
Monument 2, head, chronological
position of, 48
description, 45
Monument 8, ball, description, 45
Monument 4, ball, description, 45
Monument 5, standing figure, chron-
ological position of, 48
description, 45
Mexicano preferred
INDEX
Monuments, stone, Cerro del las
Mesas—Continued.
Monument 6, large basaltic stone,
carvings defaced, description, 46
Monument 7, animal head, deserip-
tion, 46
Monument 8, anthropomorphic
monkey head, description, 46
Monuments, stone, Izapa:
Monument 1, carved stone, descrip-
tion, 65
Monument 2, “El Leon,”
head, description, 68
guardian spirit of, 68, 73
realistic form of jaguar head
with open mouth, 38, 68
Monument 3, serpent’s head, de-
scription, 72
Monument 4, slender column, de-
seription, 72
Monuments, stone, La Venta, 56-58, 59
Monument 1, colossal head, com-
parisons, 49, 57, 58
description, 56
animal
first seen by Biom and La
Farge, 49
Monument 2, colossal head, descrip-
tion, 57
Monument 3, colossal head, descrip-
tion, 57
Monument 4, colossal head, descrip-
tion, 58
Monument 5, “baby-face’” figure,
compared with early Tres Zapotes
figurine, 60
description, 58
located in stone enclosure, 59
Monument 6, sandstone sarcopha-
gus, description, 59
Monument 7, basalt tomb, deserip-
tion, 59
Monuments, stone, Tres Zapotes, 16-25
definition of term “monument,” 11
Monument A, Colossal Head, de-
scription, 16-17
in original position, 31
Monument B, box, description, 17-18
Monument ©, box, compared with
monument B, 18
description, 18-21
referred to by Weyerstall as
Monument 5, 18
Monument D, barrel-shaped stone,
description, 21
Monument BH, rock numeral in ar-
royo bed, description, 21-22
Monument F, human figure, descrip-
tion, 22
referred to by Weyerstall as
Monument 2, 22
Monument G, human figure, descrip-
tion, referred to by Weyerstall
as Monument 3, 22
Monument H, owl image, descrip-
tion, 23
INDEX
Monuments, stone, Tres Zapotes—Con.
Monuments I, J, and K, human fig-
ures, description, 23
Monument L, human figure, descrip-
tion, 24
Monuments M and N, human figure
and basin, description, 24
Monuments O and P, stone carvings,
description, 24-25
Monzon, Arturo, 6
Mortars, stone, 61
Mound group near La Sierra, 29
Mound groups, Izapa:
Group A, 65
stone monuments composing, 61
Group B, 68
stone monuments composing, 61
Group C, 68
stone monuments composing, 61
Mound groups, Tres Zapotes:
Burnt Mounds Group, 17, 21, 23, 24
Group 1, 14, 16, 31
Mound A, 23
Group 2, 16
Mound B, 22
Mound C, 18-22
Mound J, 23
Mound K, 23
Mound L, stela A found at base
of, 11
Mound M, 22
Group 3, 14, 16, 28, 24
Mound OC, 14
Mound D, 25
Mound BH, 25
Group 4, 14
Long Mound, 24, 25
Mounds, Cerro de las Mesas:
Mound 2, large stone near, 47
Mound 5, 43
Mounds, Tres Zapotes, size of, 11
Nahuatl, prevailing language of Tres
Zapotes in 15th century, 5
prevailing language of Tuxtla in
15th century, 6
“Name” glyph, numerical, Stela 4, Cerro
de las Mesas, 47
National Geographic Society, 7, 61
National Museum of Mexico, 3, 7, 14, 21,
29, 35
New York Times, article in, on Cerro de
las Mesas, 32
Noguera, Eduardo, 4
Numerical inscriptions, see Initial Se-
ries; Bar and dot numerals.
“name” glyph, Stela 4, Cerro de las
Mesas, 47
“Numero Uno,” modern name for Cerro
de Gallo, 32
Oaxaca, 5
State of, 1, 5
Ojochal, village of, location of Monu-
ment 7, Cerro de las Mesas, 46
Old Empire Maya cities, 4
81
“Olmeec” face, figure with, compared
with Stela 9, Cerro de las Mesas, 42
features, characteristic of Monu-
ment 1, La Venta, 56
open-jaguar-mouth motive on Altar
4, La Venta, 54
possibly on Altar 5, 55
physical type represented in colos-
sal stone heads, 3
style of art, “Kthiopian’” features
identified with, 7
shown on Monument 5, La Ven-
ta, 58
Open-jaguar-mouth design, 54, 55, 68
Owl, basalt image of, 23
Oxintok, Yucatan, Katun 2 date from,
compared with Stela 6, Cerro de las
Mesas, 38
Paint, dark purplish-red, used on Monu-
ment 4, La Venta, 58
Papaloapan River, 7, 8
entered by Alvarado, 5
Peru, reference to stone monuments
of, 1
Petroglyphs on large boulder
rios, 30
on stone, San Juan River,
Piedras Negras, 32
Platform, stone, Tres Zapotes, 25
Plazas, Cerro de las Mesas, 32
Plaza 1) 32
location of Stela 9, 42
location of Stelae 1 and 2, 33
Plaza 2, location of Monument 5, 45
location of Stela 3, 33
majority of stone monuments
contained in, 32
unworked stones in, 47
Plaza 8, location of Stela 14, 44
location of Stela 12, 48
unworked stones in, 47
Plaza 4, 32
unworked stones in, 47
Plumed serpent, see Designs on stone
monuments.
Popoluea tribe, reference to, 7
Quetzalcoatl, 33, 41
monument from Huilocintla repre-
senting, 3
Red ware incensario, 29
Richardson, Francis, 32
Rio Blanco, 31
Rio de Alvarado, 6
Rio Tecolapan, 27, 28
Rio Tuxtla, 27
Ruppert, Karl, 61
Saltillo, 29
Salto Barranca, 27, 28
stela near, 29
stone head of “Totonac” type at, 28
San Andrés Tuxtla, 4, 7
San Augustine River, 27
evidence in area between and moun-
tains of large aboriginal popula-
tion, 30
near Li-
29
82
San Francisco, Mexico, 28
San Isidro, Initial Series at, 73
San Isidro Piedra Parada, Guatemala,
figure from with “Olmeec” face com-
pared with Stela 9, Cerro de las
Mesas, 42
stelae of,
stelae, 72
San Juan, 29
San Juan de las Reyes, 27
San Juan River, 5, 8
San Marcos, 27
basalt head of, 27
San Martin Mountain, 8
San Martin Pajapan volcano, 50
San Miguel Chapultepec, see “Chapul-
tepec Stone.”
San Pablo, 27
Santa Lucia Cozumalhua!pa,
monument from, 34
figure from compared with Stela 4,
Cerro de las Mesas, 35
Mixtee preferred language in pre-
Conquest times, 6
Santana, mound group, Cerro de las
Mesas, 81
Santiago Tuxtla, municipality of, 4
Sarcophagus, sandstone, 59
stone, Monument 6, La Venta, 49
Seler, H., 7
Seler-Sachs, C., 7
Serpent, plumed, see Designs on stone
monuments. uN
Serpent’s head, Monument 3, Izapa, 72
See also Designs on stone monu-
ments.
Sherds and figurines, Izapa, paucity of,
Ws
compared with Izapa
earved
Site of archeological investigations.
Cerro de las Mesas, 31
Izapa, 62
La Venta, 48
Tres Zapotes, 8-11
Smithsonian Institution, see National
Geographic Society-Smithsonian In-
ae archeological expeditions,
Spinden, Dr. Herbert, visit to Cerro de
las Mesas, 32, 33
tairways, stone, Tres Zapotes, 25, 26
Stela cult, extent of, 73
in region west of Maya area, 3
Stelae, Cerro de las Mesas, 33-44
Stela 1, compared with Stela 2, 33
description, 33
Stela 2, comparisons, 41, 43
description, 33
Stela 8, chronological position of,
47, 48
comparisons, 33, 41, 43, 45
deseription, 33-34
INDEX
Stelae, Cerro de las Mesas—Con.
Stela 4, chronological position of, 47
compared with Stela 11, 48
description, 34-85
Stela 5, chronological position of,
47
description, 35
design similar to that
“Chapultepec Stone,” 3
Stela 6, chronological position of, 47
comparisons, 34, 35, 42, 43
description, 34-39
glyph column on, 35
Initial Series date on, 38-39
Stela 7, description, 89-41
Stela 8, chronological position of,
47, 48
comparisons, 34, 35, 48, 45
deseription, 41-42
Initial Series date on, 41-42
Stela 9, chronological position of, 48
compared with Stela 3, 34
deseription, 42
Stela 10, chronological position of,
4T
compared with Stela 3, 34
description, 42-48
Stela 11, chronological position of,
47
compared with Stela 4, 34
description, 45
Stela 12, deseription, 43
Stela 13, chronological position of,
47
description, 48
Stela 14, chronological position of,
47
deseription, 44
located on Plaza 3, 44
Stela 15, chronological
of, 48
description, 44
Stelae, Izapa:
Stela 1, accompanied by Altar 1, 62
description, 62
mention of, 63
Stela 2, comparisons, 64, 65
description, 63
Stela 2, comparisons, 64, 65
deseription, 63
Stela 3, accompanied by Altar 2, 63
comparisons, 64, 65
description, 63
Stela 4, description, 63-64
design of compared with Altar
DOD
Stela 5, description, 64-65
Stela 6, accompanied by Altar 4, 65
description, 65
design on compared with Stela.
11, 67
Stela 7, description, 66
possible association with Altar
8, 65
of
position
INDEX 8&3
Stelae, Tres Zapotes, 11-16
Stela A, description, 11-14
in original position, 30
Stela B, deseription, 14
Stela C, compared with Stela A, 13
description, 14
only stela with altar, 14, 73
probable date of, 22
Stela D, called by Weyerstall
Stelae, Izapa—Continuec .
Stela 8, accompanied by Altar 5, 66
compared with Stela 10, 67
description, 66
Stela 9, accompanied by Altar 6, 67
description, 66
Stela 10, accompanied by Altar 7, 67
description, 67
Stela 11, comparison, 64, 67
description, 67 Monument 4, 16
Stela 12, accompanied by Altar 8, description, 14-16
68 realistic form of jaguar head, 3
compared with Stela 5, 64 Stela E, description, 16
description, 67-68 Stela near Salto Barranca, 28, 29
Stela 18, accompanied by Altar 9, 69 | Stela of columnar basalt near EH] Meson,
deseription, 69 28-29
Stela 14, accompanied by Altar 10,}| Stewart, Richard, photographer of Na-
69 tional Geographic Society, 2, 4, 61
description, 69 Stirling, Marion, 2, 61
Stela 15, accompanied by Altar 11,] Stone art of Izapa-San Isidro style, re-
69 lations of, 73
description, 69 carvings, see Designs on stone
Stela 16, accompanied by Altar monuments.
12, 69 fire pit, Tres Zapotes, 26
description, 69 , head from San Marcos, 27
Stela 17, description, 70 jaguar from Tlapacoya, 26
Stela 18, accompanied by Altar 14, monuments, Cerro de las Mesas,
70 44-47
deseription, 70 majority found in Plaza 2, 32
mention of, 71
Stela 19, accompanied by Altar 16,
Tal
description, 71
re 20, accompanied by Altar 17,
1 :
compared with Stela 19, 71
description, 71
Stelae, La Venta, 50-52
numbers given by Blom retained by
Stirling, except Stela 3, 49
Stela 1, description, 50
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
mention of, 58
picture of shown in Joyce note.
49
realistic form of jaguar head,
3, 50
Stela 2, compared wiih Stela 3, 52
description, 50-51
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
mention of, 56
Stela 3, description, 51-52
first seen by Blom and La
Farge, 49
relative chronology of, 47
See also Monuments, stone,
Cerro de las Mesas.
monuments, Izapa, division into six
groups, 61
See also Monuments, stone,
Izapa.
monuments, La Venta, numbers
given by Blom retained by Stir-
ling, 49
total number known from site,
See also Monuments, stone, La
Venta.
monuments, Tres Zapotes, 11-25
relation to cultural column dis-
cussed, 30-31
See also Monuments, stone,
Tres Zapotes.
mortars, 61
platform, Tres Zapotes, 25
stairway, Tres Zapotes, 26
stelae in State of Veracruz, two
monuments described by Seler, 3
tombs, 49, 59
with “letters” reported near WI
Meson, 29
with petroglyphs, San Juan River,
29
located in stone enclosure, 59
referred to by Blom as Altar 1, Stones, unworked, Cerro de las Mesas, 47
Strong, Dr. William Duncan, 1
49, 52 Such 27
Stela 4, compared with Monument 3, Ree Mexico, State of, 2
57 Tapachula, 61, 71
description, 52
Stela 5, description, 52
located in stone enclosure, 59
Tehuantepec, Isthmus of, 73, 74
relation of earth-mound sites of to
Izapa site, 72
S4
Tepatlaxco, State of, stone monuments
from, reference to, 3
Thompson, Hrie, 42, 72
“Tiger mask” panel, provenience of, 3
Tlacotalpan, 4, 5
agriculture of, 6
climate of, 5-6
condition of, in pre-Conquest times,
ethnological notes on, 6
fauna of, contrasted with that of
Tuxtla, 6
human sacrifice practiced in, 6
reached by Alvarado, 5
tribute paid to Montezuma, 5
“Taloe,” incensario in form of, 33
reference to, 46
Tlapacoya, 26
“Toad god” whistle from San Marcos, 29
Tomb, basalt, 49, 59
stone, Monument 7, La Venta, 59
Tonala, Chiapas, 59, 73
“Tonalamatl” date, 48
Tonala River, 48, 50
Tononapan, Krickeberg’s
ferred to, 7
Totonac boundaries,
Krickebere’s map, 7
Totonae, not spoken in early Tres Za-
potes, 7
Townsend, Prescott, 32
Tree design, stone carving, 64
Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico, 4-30
archeological remains at, composi-
tion of, 10
Arroyo San Juan, 27
early historical data on, 5
earth mounds of, compared with
those of La Venta, 48
See also Mound groups, Tres
Zapotes.
geography of
§-11
Initial Series, occurrence at, 73
La Puente, 26
life in, in pre-Cortesian
sketch of, 5-6
modern village of, location, 4-5
mention of, 8, 10
population of, agriculturists, 4
isolation of, 5
eontrasted with pre
Cortesian conditions,
map of re-
according to
archeological site,
times,
region, ethnie composition of, 5-6
Rio Tecolapan, 27
San Marcos, 27
site, first mention of, 17
size of mounds at, 11
stelae, 11-16
See also Stelae, Tres Zapotes.
INDEX
Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico—Con-
tinued.
stone fire pit, 26
monuments, 11-25
definition of term, 11
See also Monuments, stone,
Tres Zapotes.
platform, 25
stairway, 26
“tiger mask” panel, decorative mo-
tive on stelae at, 3
Tlapacoya, 26
use of columnar basalt at, 50
Tuxtla Chico, 71
Tuxtla Mountain, 8, 11, 26, 27
Tuxtla, pre-Cortesian life in, sketch of, 6
head flattening practiced, 6
war with Guazaqualeo (Coatzcol-
co), 6
Tuxtla-San Martin region, probable
source of columnar basalt, 50
hypothesis of method of transpor-
tation from, 50
Tuxtla Statuette, compared with Monu-
ment 5, Cerro de las Mesas, 46, 47
Uitzilopochli, Aztec God, worshipped in
Tuxtla, 6
Vaillant, George C., 60
Valenzuela, Juan, 4
Valley of Mexico, see Mexico, Valley of.
Venus ceremonial, 48
Venus symbol on Cerro de las Mesas
carvings, 33, 42
Veracruz, State of, 1, 73
carved stone stelae of, 3
southern, earth-mound sites of, re-
lation to Izapa site, 72
Veracruz-Tehuantepee Railway, 32
Veracruz-Tehuantepec region, 73
Stela C, Tres Zapotes, only stela in
with altar, 73
Veracruz-Tehuantepec style, stelae dec-
orated in, 73
Villa Hermosa, 24, 49, 59
stone figure from compared with
Monument M, Tres Zapotes, 24
Weiant, Dr. C. W., field assistant, Na-
tional Geographic Society-Smithson-
ian Institution archeological expedi-
tion, 2
historical data on early Tres Zapo-
tes by, 4
Weiant, Marian, 2
Weyerstall, Albert, 7, 18, 22
Yueatan, influence of culture of, on
early Tres Zapotes, 5
Zapotecan Codices, reference to, 48
Zapotec glyph, reference to, 41, 43
fas, }
, 5 m i
* J \ Stn one an, f i ; rn
ey teat “ Pe —!
a iy a H Sue
er a eee ae *
' i + ray f pO i
} a i if i 1 His 1 1
ae “ei eles eh Ho iy
mA 4 ie uy Ar ‘I man f
4 ie I ih
We
ae, M
a,
vad ly ; : te ind |
cee r in ‘| i uF
a
i
*
; I
i
a
g
i
My ai i
I
t
; 1
i
I
We 1 i
j
\
‘ |
{
i
f
iy
i i i
L if
ae ;
ate ane
Vie, P,
; int
; ; ; i Re ost a
: Aly ai i} rn ,
1%, t
i i =
| . : : 7
i ii
\ TA |
a . i j iy rT u 7
f ‘ ni f
i _ , (i ) 1 LA
- i) ih
j nh fy oe fai) Oru
. i 7) it
q a i ;
i
a 7 5
' 7 i
Pity i
j ‘i ip cath 7
a
a
Vara ti
ive Al aN s ou a>
, Anal + waar
cael ede k
Ti id
gay7Th i oy,
[vee ‘ne
time baa
PeSET’ On Lae
hae ad a ;
ee i. Ph
| oe " eK, rf Ab a ele
Bey A NOR Pe
ri hie
i vane
DAU oh f
M ie ne
1
wre lj
wi args,
a i ne
:
Sa
vo
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11