Skip to main content

Full text of "Bulletin"

See other formats


Hi 


111 


III 


iil 


^?EKIA1 


7 


Oqn  utfF 


Class (e.33..,'7.3 

Number  ..Jx  S. 3 

Volume I S*°~fa-  Zj 

Source 

Received 

Cost 

Accession  No.     j  4-  /  0  J 


£^.73    -m± 


*3"l 


Bulletin  41 


January,   1897 


NEW  HAMPSHIRE  COLLEGE 


AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 


Varieties 


POTATOES 

Fertilizers 


Scab 


BY  F.  WM.  RANE  AND  LEIQH  HUNT 


NEW  HAMPSHIRE  COLLEGE 

OF 

AGRICULTURE  AND  THE  MECHANIC  ARTS 

DURHAM 


NEW  HAMPSHIRE  COLLEGE 

OF 

AGRICULTURE  AND  THE  MECHANIC  ARTS 


AGRICULTURAL  EXPERIMENT  STATION 

Durham,  N.  H. 


BOARD  OF  CONTROL 

Hon.  GEO.  A.  WASON,  Chairman,  New  Boston. 
Pres.  CHAS.  S.  MURKLAND,  ex-officio,  Durham. 
CHARLES  W.  STONE,  A.  M.,  Secretary,  Andover. 
Hon.  JOHN  G.  TALLANT,  Pembroke. 
Hon.  FRANK  JONES,  Portsmouth. 


THE  STATION  COUNCIL 

President  CHAS.  S.  MURKLAND,  A.  M.,  Ph.  D.,  Acting 
Director. 

FRED  W.  MORSE,  B.  S.,  Vice-Director  and  Chemist. 

FRANK  WM.  RANE,  B.  Agr.,  M.  S.,  Agriculturist  and  Hor- 
ticulturist. 

CHAS.  H.  PETTEE,  A.  M.,  C.  E.,  Meteorologist. 

HERBERT  H.  LAM  SON,  M.  D.,  Bacteriologist. 

CLARENCE  M.  WEED,  D.  Sc,  Entomologist. 

ASSISTANTS 

LEIGH   HUNT,   B.   S.,  Assistant   Agriculturist   and   Horticul- 
turist. 
CHARLES  D.  HOWARD,  B.  S.,  Assistant  Chemist. 
CLEMENT  S.  MORRIS,  Clerk. 

The  Hulletins  of  this  Station  are  sent  free  to  any  resident  of  New  Hamp- 
shire upon  application. 


EXPERIMENTS  WITH  POTATOES 


BY    F.   VVM.   RANE  AND  LEIGH  HUNT. 


The  potato  is  more  commonly  grown  and  used  than  any  other 
vegetable.  Scarcely  any  farm  or  garden  is  without  them.  Owing 
to  this  fact,  growers  have  exerted  themselves  to  get  new  varie- 
ties, many  of  which  are  identical  with  old  ones,  except  that  they 
are  given  other  names.  One  person,  for  instance,  finds  that  in 
a  few  years  his  Early  Rose  is  superior  to  those  of  his  neighbors, 
and  therefore  distinguishes  it  by  a  new  name.  Not  all  new 
varieties  come  about  in  this  way,  however,  as  we  have  some 
noted  men  who  are  worthy  the  title  of  potato-breeders  or  origi- 
nators. 

In  taking  up  the  study  of  the  potato  during  the  past  season  at 
this  Station,  we  did  not  deem  it  necessary  to  enter  into  the  whole 
subject  in  detail.  Methods  of  culture,  size  of  cuttings  to  use, 
various  insecticides  and  fungicides  recommended  for  both  tops 
and  tubers,  fertilizers,  etc.,  have  been  very  fully  experimented 
on  in  recent  years  by  various  authorities,  and  we  have  their 
valuable  experience  to  begin  with. 

The  work  upon  which  this  report  is  based  is  as  follows,  in 
outline  : 

i.  Comparison  of  varieties. 

2.  Difference  in  effect  of  muriate  and  sulphate  of  potash 
upon  potatoes. 

3.  Potato  seed  treated  with  corrosive  sublimate  as  compared 
with  that  untreated. 

I.    COMPARISON    OF    VARIETIES 

This  being  our  first  season's  test,  we  desire  to  state  that  it  is 
offered  only  that  others  may  make  use  of  it  in  comparison  with 
their  own  experience.     Just  because  a  certain  variety  has  given 


4  EXPERIMENTS    WITH    POTATOES 

a  fair  yield  this  year,  it  does  not  follow  that  it  will  do  equally 
well  next  season.  The  causes  of  variation  from  year  to  year  in 
the  same  variety  cannot  be  due  to  the  soil  alone.  It  is  not 
uncommon  to  be  able  to  select  two  hills  of  the  same  variety  side 
by  side,  the  one  far  more  productive  than  the  other. 

Some  varieties  of  potatoes,  as  the  Rural  New  Yorker  No.  2, 
American  Wonder,  Early  Rose,  White  Star,  etc.,  have  sufficient 
merit  to  gain  a  generally  good  reputation,  while  others  become 
valuable  only  locally.  These  facts  are  found  out  only  by  trial 
tests. 

The  accompanying  photograph,  Figure  1,  will  give  a  fair  idea 
as  to  the  characteristic,  form,  and  appearance  of  each  of  the 
eighty  varieties  under  test  the  past  season.  The  number  above 
each  potato  refers  to  the  same  number  before  its  name  in  the 
table.  That  specimen  was  selected  that  contained  the  most 
decidedly  typical  characteristics  of  its  variety. 


I        I 


"3 


9  10  11 


12        rj 


1  l 


15  16 


*>\ 


%>■  %>3 


"S  i 


17 


18 


19  20  21         22 


23 


21 


31  32 

25         26      27         28  29  ^ 


^SMfct*^  w 


33  34  35         36        37 


^ 


38         39  l0 


<**» 


i 

13         |(  15  17  IS 

52  53 

57  58  59^       60  61  62       63A       64 

65  66         67         68  69  70  ^71         72 


41 


48 


0„        51         52  53  54 


73  74         75        76  77 


78 


79        80 


Fig.  2 — Varieties  of  Potatoes. 


6 


EXPERIMENTS  WITH  POTATOES 


TABLE  I. —Comparison  of  Varieties  of  Potatoes.      (Yield  Per  Acre  Cal- 
culated from  Forty-eight  Feet  of  row,  and  Four  Pounds  of  Seed.) 


s 

55 


Variety. 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

li 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

37 

3-t 

39 

40 


Uncle  Sam  (2  lbs.  to  36  ft.  of  row) 

American  Wonder 

Banner 

Blush 

Brownell's  Winner 

Burpee's  Extra  Early 

Burpee's  Superior 

Bill  Nye 

Bracey's  Rising  Sun 

Carman,  No.  1 

Carman,  No.  3 

Champion 

Clark's  No.  1 

Clay  Rose 

Crown  Jewel 

Country  Gentleman 

Delaware 

Dewdrop  Rose 

Early  Harvest 

Early  Market 

Early  Norther 

Early  Puritan 

Early  Rose 

Earlv  Six  Weeks 

Everitt 

Early  Fortune 

Early  Wisconsin 

Early  Thoroughbred 

Freeman 

Farmer's  Alliance 

Good  News 

Great  Divide 

Green  Mountain 

Harbinger 

Houlton  Rose 

Harvest  Queen 

Howe's  Premium 

Honeoye  Rose 

Irish  Cobbler — 

Irish  Daisy 


0> 

o 
a 

- 


214 
240 
273 
272 
305 
215 
209 
195 
165 
230 
239 
152 
193 
243 
223 
270 
214 
258 
248 
99 
244 
198 
267 

no 

160 
148 
233 
220 
174 
246 
232 
224 
180 
155 
305 
287 
140 
224 
301 
154 


Variety. 


41 
12 
43 
44 
45 
16 
47 
is 
III 
50 
51 
52 
53 
51 
55 
56 
57 
58 
59 
60 
61 
62 
63 
64 
65 
66 
67 
68 
69 
Vll 
71 
72 
73 
71 
75 
76 
77 
7* 
79 
80 


u 
o 

ea 
u 

- 


King  of  the  Roses 309 

Koshkonong 227 

Late  Puritan 316 

Leonard's  Favorite 307 

Maggie  Murphy 201 

Money  Maker 223 

Mill'sEndurance 118 

New  Queen 289 

Ohio  Jr 256 

Orphan    |  240 

Parker's  Market i  255 

Polaris 242 

Peerless  Jr 219 

Prize  Taker !  274 

237 
315 
342 
453 
263 
303 
209 
247 
149 
300 
354 
229 
243 
271 
394 
325 
171 
307 
323 
399 
257 
329 
184 
373 
232 
375 


Pride  of  Ireland 

Queen  of  the  Valley 

Quick  Crop 

Reeve's  Rose 

Rochester  Rose 

Rupert's  Perfection 

Rutland  Rose : 

Rural  New  Yorker,  No.  2.. 

Rose,  No.  9 

Seneca  Beauty 

Sir  William 

Somerset 

Salzer's  World's  Fair 

Victor  Rose  

Vick's  Perfection 

Vaughan  

Vick's  Advancer 

White  Star 

White  Mountain 

White  Rose 

Wilson's  Fair  Choice 

Woodhull's  Seedling 

World's  Fair 

Woodburv  White 

White  Ohio 

Governor  Rusk 


The  potato  plot  was  a  good  loam  soil,  grading  into  a  light  clay 
towards  the  south  and  east.  A  crop  of  millet  was  grown  upon 
the  land  in  1895,  and  potatoes  in  1894.  In  the  spring  of  1896 
a  light  coating  of  cow  manure  and  a  heavy  application  of  a  com- 
plete potato  fertilizer  were  spread  upon  the  plot.  The  land  was 
furrowed,  and  the  potato  seed  cut  in  the  ordinary  manner,  two 
or  three  eyes  to  each  piece,  and  two  pieces  dropped  every  two 
feet.     At  the  second  hoeing,  the  rows  were  partly  hilled.     After 


NOTES    ON   VARIETIES  7 

the  bugs  appeared,  the  vines  were  treated  three  times  with  Paris 
green,  and  twice  sprayed  with  Bordeaux  mixture.  The  second 
and  third  time  that  Paris  green  was  used,  it  was  stirred  into 
the  Bordeaux  mixture. 

May  and  June  were  cool,  dry  months,  and  potatoes  started 
slowly.  While  the  rest  of  the  season  was  sufficiently  wet,  there 
was  no  continuous  moist,  muggy  weather  to  induce  late  blight 
and  rot. 

TABLE  II. — The  Fifteen  Heaviest  Yielders,  in  Order  of  Productiveness. 


<x> 
,0 

a 

a 


Varieties. 


Yield  per 
acre. 


58 
74 
69 
80 
78 
65 
57 
76 
70 
73 
43 
56 
41 
44 
72 


Eeeve's  Rose.   

White  Rose 

Vick's  Perfection  — 

Governor  Rusk 

Woodburv  White 

Sir  William 

Quick  Crop 

Woodhull's  Seedling 

Vaughan 

White  Mountain 

Late  Puritan 

Queen  of  the  Valley  . 

King  of  the  Roses 

Leonard's  Favorite. 
White  Star 


453 
399 
394 
375 
373 
354 
342 
329 
324 
323 
316 
315 
310 
307 
306 


NOTES    ON    VARIETIES. 


i.  Uncle  Sam  (Henderson). — This  variety  was  first  put  upon 
the  market  last  season.  The  introducers  claim  it  to  be  a  heavy 
yielder,  of  uniform  shape  and  size,  and  superior  in  cooking 
qualities,  which  claims  seem  to  be  well-founded — from  our  results 
the  past  season.  It  made  strong,  healthy  vines,  continued  to 
grow  late,  and  yielded  well.  The  tubers  were  oval  in  shape,  of 
handsome  appearance,  and  but  few  small  ones.  Skin  mostly  a 
clean  white,  with  a  somewhat  russetty  appearance.  It  ripens 
with  Rural  New  Yorker.  All  things  considered,  this  potato 
gives  great  promises  for  the  future.  Mr.  H.  N.  Hammond,  a 
seedsman  and  potato-grower  of  Michigan,  says  :  "  Heretofore.  I 
have  considered  the  Carman,  No.  3,  the  most  perfect  of  all  late 
varieties  I  have  tested,  but  from  one  season's  trial,  I  must  admit 


8  EXPERIMENTS    WITH    POTATOES 

that   Uncle  Sam  even   surpassed  Carman,  No.  3,  in  wonderful 
growth,  in  yield,  and  last,  but  not  least,  in  quality." 

2.  American  Wonder. — Within  the  past  few  years,  this  variety 
has  been  very  generally  grown.  From  general  reports,  it  stands 
up  well  in  productiveness.  The  vines  are  very  vigorous,  and  do 
not  blight  readily.  The  potatoes  are  white  ;  medium  to  large; 
quite  uniform  in  size,  and  regular  in  shape.  Its  yield  at  the 
Michigan  Station,  in  1895,  was  379  bushels,  with  an  average 
yield  for  four  years  of  242  bushels.  At  the  Ohio  Station,  in  1895, 
it  yielded  276  bushels,  with  an  average  yield  for  two  years  of 
222  bushels.     Our  yield  the  past  season  was  240  bushels. 

3.  Banner  (Livingston). — This  potato  is  of  very  pleasing 
appearance.  It  does  not  appear  to  have  the  fixed  characteris- 
tics that  mark  other  stable  varieties  ;  the  eyes  are  both  shallow 
and  deep,  and  the  color  not  sufficiently  uniform.  It  was  above 
the  average  in  productiveness. 

4.  Blush. — A  very  vigorous,  red  and  deep-eyed  variety.  Fairly 
productive,  and  medium  early ;  round  to  oblong  in  shape. 

10.  Carman,  No.  1  (Thorburn,  1894). — This  variety  was  intro- 
duced in  1894,  and  is  one  of  Carman's  seedlings.  The  vines 
were  large,  with  far  spreading  branches,  making  a  thick  foliage. 
The  tubers  were  numerous  but  not  large,  running  from  medium 
to  small,  and  usually  oval  in  form,  squaring  off  at  the  ends.  The 
eyes  were  shallow  ;  color,  white.  It  ripened  in  midseason.  Its 
greatest  drawback  seemed  to  be  its  setting  more  tubers  than 
could  be  matured  of  fair  size.  It  is  reported  by  others  as  out- 
yielding  and  giving  better  size  than  the  Rural  New  Yorker,  No.  2. 

Carman,  No.  j  (Thorburn,  1895). — This  variety  is  widely  and 
favorably  known,  because  of  its  very  general  introduction  and 
growth  in  1895.  It  is  another  seedling  of  Mr.  Carman's,  and 
resembles  in  appearance  of  growth  the  Rural  New  Yorker,  No.  2, 
with  purple  sprouts,  purple  blossoms,  and  dark-colored  stalks. 
It  is  a  late  variety.  The  shape  is  somewhat  longer  than  that  of 
the  Rural  New  Yorker,  No.  2.    There  were  but  few  small  tubers. 

14.  Clay  Rose. — This  potato  is  a  late  red  variety.  It  is 
claimed  to  be  specially  adapted  for  stiff  clay  soils.  It  was  small 
and  short  in  shape,  and  eyes  rather  deep.     Not  promising. 

16.    Country    Gentleman    (Jerrard,    1896). — This     potato    was 


NOTES    ON   VARIETIES  9 

introduced  the  past  season  by  Mr.  Jerrard,  of  Caribou,  Me.  It 
grew  very  well  during  the  fore  part  of  the  season,  but  blighted 
early.  The  tubers  were  not  very  large,  and  of  various  shapes. 
It  was  a  medium  late,  of  rose  color,  with  shallow  eyes.  Forty- 
three  per  cent,  scabby. 

21.  Early,  Norther  (Jerrard,  1892). — A  medium  early  market 
variety.  It  resembles  the  Early  Rose  in  general  appearance. 
Was  not  very  uniform  in  size  and  form  this  season. 

28.  Early  Thoroughbred  (Maule,  1896). — This  newly  intro- 
duced variety  does  not  seem  to  have  any  points  of  special  merit 
to  recommend  it.  It  may  need  a  soil  different  in  some  respects 
from  ours.  The  tubers  were  generally  small,  oblong,  and  not 
attractive.      It  belongs  to  the  Rose  family. 

29.  Freeman  (Maule,  1891). — This  variety  is  very  highly  fla- 
vored ;  tubers  white ;  shape,  round  to  oblong.  It  seems  to 
require  high  culture.  Potatoes  too  small  for  marketable  pur- 
poses. 

38.  Honeoye  Rose  (Dibble,  1896). — Mr.  Dibble  offered  this 
for  the  first  time  the  past  season,  ahd  says  it  is  a  seedling  of  the 
Victor  Rose,  which  in  turn  was  a  seedling  of  the  Reeve's  Rose. 
It  did  not  yield  as  well  as  either  of  its  ancestors  with  us  last 
season.  The  size  was  good,  having  but  few  small  tubers  ;  eyes, 
shallow.      Promising. 

41.  King  of  the  Roses. — A  medium  early,  strong-growing 
variety,  of  good  rose  color  ;  oblong  in  shape,  resembling  Reeve's 
Rose  quite  closely.  Rather  too  large  a  proportion  of  small 
tubers.     Good  yield.     Nine  per  cent,  scabby. 

43.  Late  Puritan. — A  late,  yellowish-colored  variety,  of  vigor- 
ous habits  of  growth.  The  tubers  long,  uniform  in  size  and 
regular  in  shape  ;  fine  appearance. 

44.  Leonard's  Favorite. — Was  fairly  productive,  of  rose  color, 
and  with  long,  slender,  spreading  growth.     A  good  early  variety. 

45.  Maggie  Murphy  (Vick). — A  midseason  variety,  pink  in 
color,  and  quite  widely  grown.  Its  yield  was  light  here  this 
past  season,  but  the  tubers  were  mostly  of  marketable  size.  In 
some  sections  of  the  state  it  is  reported  as  not  being  a  good 
keeper,  and  of  poor  quality.     Generally,  it  seems  to  be  a  favorite. 

46.  Money  Maker  (Dibble,  1895).— A  long,  white,  cylindrical 


10  EXPERIMENTS  WITH  POTATOES 

potato,  with  a   tendency  to  have   protruding  knobs.     A  rather 
large  proportion  of  small  potatoes. 

50.  Orphan. — A  fine,  long,  slender,  smooth,  white  potato; 
shallow  eyes.  Uniform  in  shape,  size",  and  color.  It  presents  a 
good  appearance. 

51.  Parker's  Market  (Jerrard,  1895). — Oblong  to  cylindrical  in 
shape.  Red  color  ;  claimed  to  withstand  rot,  and  adapted  to 
heavy  soil.     Medium  size,  but  too  many  small  tubers. 

53.  Peerless,  Jr. — Flat  and  rectangular  in  shape.  Eyes  shal- 
low, and  mostly  at  the  tip  end  of  tuber.  All  of  good  size.  Re- 
sembles the  Rural  New  Yorker,  No.  2. 

57.  Quick  Crop. — A  potato  of  the  Hebron  type,  although 
somewhat  darker  in  color.  Smooth,  oblong,  and  of  fair  size; 
yield,  good ;  a  promising  variety.  It  is  grown  mainly  in  the 
West. 

58.  Reeve's  Rose.  This  variety  is  grown  extensively  by  the 
Jersey  and  Long  Island  truckers.  It  was  the  most  productive 
grown  at  the  Station  last  season,  but  the  percentage  of  large 
tubers  was  not  as  great  as  of  some  others  ;  not  so  productive. 
It  is  rather  deep-eyed,  pink  in  color,  slender  and  oblong  in  shape, 
and  second  early  in  ripening.      Strong,  vigorous  tops. 

63.  Rose,  JVo.  g  (Dibble). — A  late,  red  variety,  introduced  the 
past  season  by  the  Dibble  Seed  Company,  who  claim  for  it : 
"  Our  latest  and  best  late  red  variety  for  general  field  culture." 
In  their  field  test  of  207  varieties,  covering  two  years,  this 
showed  the  best  average  yield  of  the  red  sorts.  Its  yield  here 
was  among  the  lowest.  The  tubers  were  of  good  size,  but  the 
greatest  objection  was  its  tendency  to  grow  bumps,  or  protruding 
eyes  upon  the  surface,  and  to  scab  readily.  It  may  overcome 
these  objections  upon  further  trial. 

65.  Sir  William. — A  vigorous  and  prolific  late  variety.  It  is 
a  strong  grower,  with  vines  erect  and  over  three  feet  in  length. 
Color,  white  ;  long,  square  ends.  Its  being  late  to  mature  frees 
it  from  the  early  blight.  It  stood  sixth  in  rate  of  yield,  but 
much  nearer  first  in  production  of  marketable  potatoes.  We  are 
much  pleased  with  it  thus  far.  We  find  it  highly  spoken  of  by 
those  who  have  tried  it.  Prof.  W.  J.  Green,  of  the  Ohio  Experi- 
ment Station,  after  having  grown  it  on  different  kinds  of  soils 


NOTES    ON   VARIETIES 


11 


for  two  years,  says :  "  It  is  an  almost  ideal  potato,  both  for 
home  use  and  for  market."  Dr.  I.  B.  Chamberlain,  of  the  Ohio 
Farmer,  claims  it  to  be  the  best  potato  he  ever  grew.  It  was 
about  twenty  per  cent,  scabby  with  us  this  season. 


Fig.  2. — Sir  William  Potato. 


66.  Somerset  (Jerrard,  1895). — A  rose-colored  variety,  ripen- 
ing midseason,  eyes  rather  deep.  Only  average  in  productive- 
ness last  season.  The  tubers  run  evenly,  and  make  a  good 
appearance.     Quality  excellent. 

69.  Vick's  Perfection. — A  second  early  variety,  productive, 
color  white,  shape  irregular,  eyes  both  deep  and  shallow ;  no 
uniformity.  A  good  many  small  tubers  ;  sixteen  per  cent,  scabby. 

70.  Vaughan. — Numerous  tubers  set,  but  did  not  reach  suffi- 
cient size.  Blighted  early;  twenty-seven  per  cent,  scabby. 
Beauty  of  Hebron  type. 


12  EXPERIMENTS  WITH  POTATOES 

72.  White  Star. — This  old  variety  stood  well  in  the  test, 
giving  a  yield  of  306  bushels  per  acre.  The  tubers  were  long, 
evenly  cylindrical,  and  of  a  clean,  white  appearance.  Vines 
rather  slender  and  long,  of  late  growth  ;  four  per  cent,  scabby. 

73.  White  Mountain. — Healthy,  vigorous  grower;  strongly 
resistant  to  early  blight.  Well-proportioned,  large  potatoes ; 
twelve  per  cent,  scabby,  and  these  among  the  smaller  tubers. 
Yield  good. 

74.  White  Rose. —  The  tubers  were  long  and  cylindrical,  with 
very  light  pink,  shallow  eyes.  A  medium,  second  early  potato, 
of  the  White  Star  type  ;  yield  heavy,  but  too  many  small  tubers. 
The  largest  were  not  large. 

79.  White  Ohio  (Vick,  1896). — This  is  a  seedling  of  the 
Early  Ohio,  only  white  in  color.  The  introducers  claim  it  to  be 
the  earliest  white  potato  grown.  It  did  not  prove  superior  with 
us,  although  its  general  appearance  was  good.  The  yield  was 
an  average  one,  tubers  flat  and  oblong  in  shape,  and  containing 
a  fair  proportion  of  small  ones.     Shallow  eyes. 

80.  Governor  Rusk. — A  potato  of  nice  appearance,  smooth, 
long  and  cylindrical  in  shape,  of  reddish  color,  and  very  pro- 
ductive. The  tubers  averaged  good  size  ;  the  vines  were  strong 
and  large;  eighteen  per  cent,  scabby.  A  desirable  variety  if  it 
continues  to  do  as  well  as  this  season.  Ripens  with  the  second 
early  varieties. 

2.    MURIATE    VS.    SULPHATE    OF    POTASH. 

It  has  been  thought  in  recent  years  that  although  muriate  of 
potash  is  the  cheaper  form  of  the  potash  salts,  for  the  amount 
of  fertilizer  it  contains,  it  nevertheless  has  some  properties  that 
render  it  undesirable  for  a  number  of  vegetables,  among  them, 
potatoes.  Experiments  in  Germany  and  at  the  Massachusetts 
Station,  point  very  conclusively  to  this  fact.  We  tested  these 
two  forms  of  potash  on  each  of  the  eighty  varieties  of  potatoes 
grown  the  past  season,  one  half  of  each  row  being  treated  with 
sulphate,  and  one  half  with  muriate.*  The  other  forms  of  fer- 
tilizer used,  as  phosphoric  acid  and  nitrogen,  were  the  same 
throughout.     The  results  were  as  follows  : 

Of  the  eighty  varieties,  forty-seven  gave  a  heavier  yield  with 


TREATMENT  FOR  POTATO  SCAB  13 

sulphate,  and  thirty-three  with  muriate  of  potash.  The  total 
yield,  however,  was  in  favor  of  the  muriate.  The  total  weight 
of  those  grown  with  sulphate  was  1,978  pounds  and  7  ounces, 
and  with  muriate,  1,996  pounds  and  9  ounces — making  a  differ- 
ence of  18  pounds  and  2  ounces  in  favor  of  the  latter. 

In  comparing  the  percentage  of  large  and  small  potatoes, 
there  was  but  a  slight  difference.  The  weight  of  the  large,  or 
marketable,  potatoes  with  sulphate  was  1,567  pounds,  and  with 
muriate,  1,586  pounds,  19  pounds  in  favor  of  the  latter.  The 
small  potatoes  yielded  411  pounds  with  sulphate,  and  409 
pounds  with  muriate. 

From  the  data  obtained  from  this  single  year's  test,  little  pref- 
erence is  shown  for  either  of  these  forms  of  potash,  as  far  as 
yield  is  concerned. 

3.    CORROSIVE    SUBLIMATE    TREATMENT    FOR     POTATO    SCAB. 

Most  of  the  trials  in  treating  the  potato  seed  before  planting 
with  corrosive  sublimate  have  proved  it  to  be  beneficial. 
During  the  past  season,  we  tested  its  efficiency  upon  each  of  the 
eighty  varieties  grown.  The  soil,  having  been  used  for  a  potato 
crop  two  years  previously,  was  inoculated  with  the  disease.  One 
half  of  each  variety  was  placed  in  a  coarse  sack,  and  after  soak- 
ing one  and  one-half  hours  in  a  solution,  in  the  proportion  of 
two  ounces  of  corrosive  sublimate  to  sixteen  gallons  of  water, 
was  taken  out  and  drained  off;  then  cut  and  planted.  Through- 
out the  fore  part  of  the  season  the  soil  was  comparatively  dry, 
but  during  the  remainder  was  very  moist,  and  offered  exception- 
ally favorable  conditions  for  scab  development,  as  it  is  well 
known  that  moisture  favors  its  growth. 

From  the  data  secured,  we  arrive  at  the  following  results : 
Two  varieties,  Nos.  60  and  68,  were  free  from  scab  with  both 
treated  and  untreated  seed.  Two  varieties,  3  and  58,  showed 
the  same  percentage  of  scab  under  both  conditions.  Sixty-two 
varieties  favored  the  treatment,  while  the  remaining  fourteen 
did  not.  The  total  average  for  those  treated  was  24I  per  cent, 
of  scabby  potatoes,  while  for  those  untreated  it  was  35^  per 
cent.  The  efficiency  of  the  treatment,  therefore,  was  io|  per 
cent.     Considering  the  fact  that  the  soil  was  infected,  and  that 


14  EXPERIMENTS    WITH    POTATOES 

some  manure  was  used,  while  the  season  also  was  favorable  for 
scab  development,  the  results  seem  marked  in  favor  of  corrosive 
sublimate.  If  applied  to  the  seed  of  a  variety  that  gave  a 
yield  of  300  bushels  per  acre,  even  under  the  unfavorable 
conditions  mentioned,  there  would  be  30  bushels  more  free 
from  scab  than  otherwise.  This  treatment  is  very  generally 
accepted  as  being  sufficiently  practical  for  recommendation. 

SUMMARY    REMARKS. 

i.  This  being  the  first  season's  test,  we  hesitate  recom- 
mending many  of  the  varieties. 

2.  We  feel  little  hesitancy,  however,  in  recommending  such 
as  White  Star,  Rural  New  Yorker  No.  2,  American  Wonder, 
Carman  No.  3,  Governor  Rusk,  and  Sir  William,  as  these  have 
been  reported  on  favorably  from  so  many  sections. 

3.  The  fifteen  varieties  giving  the  heaviest  yield,  in  order  of 
productiveness,  are  given  in  Table  II. 

4.  The  ten  varieties  giving  the  least  yield,  in  order,  beginning 
with  the  poorest,  are  :  Early  Market,  Early  Six  Weeks,  Mill's 
Endurance,  Howe's  Premium,  Early  Fortune,  Rose  No.  9, 
Champion,  Irish  Daisy,  Houlton  Rose,  and  Bracey's  Rising  Sun. 

5.  The  average  productiveness  of  all  varieties  per  acre  was 
244  bushels,  the  lowest  being  Early  Market  with  99  bushels,  and 
the  highest,  Reeve's  Rose,  with  453  bushels. 

6.  There  was  very  little  difference  in  the  effectiveness  of 
muriate  and  sulphate  of  potash  on  potatoes.  One  appears  to 
be  about  as  effective  as  the  other. 

7.  Those  treated  with  corrosive  sublimate  gave  on  an  average 
ioi  per  cent,  less  scab  than  those  untreated;  or  about  25 
bushels  to  the  acre. 

8.  After  we  have  selected  a  sufficient  quantity  for  seed  pur- 
poses, we  shall  be  pleased  to  send,  at  the  expense  of  the  receiver, 
a  limited  quantity  (a  few  potatoes)  for  test  purposes,  provided 
the  person  receiving  them  has  had  experience  in  potato  growing, 
and  will  report  his  results  as  soon  as  the  crop  is  harvested. 


ffl\ 


111 


m 


■ '.  *VfHi 


mm 


iffi 


llllifili 


Mi 


till 


fpiSI 

lilill 


ISilPIS 

iiillii 


i 


liiiij