Skip to main content

Full text of "The Bulletin of the Beach Erosion Board"

See other formats


We 
203 


bY 


VK NA 


VOL. 5 


Vol. 


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 
CORPS OF ENGINEERS 


aT ETT ET MN a 


Marine rine Bioloz sical Ls 


[ 
| JAN 29 i951 


WOODS HOLE, MAS 


5) Apis 


JAN 22 1957 


AUIS 
LIBRA HR RY 


3; 


THE oH oT 
j DOCU : VENT ) 
BULLETIN : OOLeE : Sony 


Rn AT ae 


OF THE 


BEACH EROSION BOARD 


OFFICE, CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 


JANUARY 1, 1951 NO.1 


go? 


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 


CORPS OF ENGINEERS 


THE BULLETIN 
OF THE 
BEACH EROSION BOARD 


TABLE OF CONTENTS 


Page 
British Coast Protection act of 1949 .ccccccccccccee 1 
Generalization of the Formula for Calculation of 
Rock Fill Dikes and Verification of its 
Coefficients e@eeeoeootcevoeaeevpeeeoesevsereoeve7ee eee eoeeeegeeeenes 4 


Announcement of Publication .......- C0D006 d000000000 24 


Application ef Asphalt in Hydraulic fngineering 


Works PCSSTHSHCAOSHSHSOCHHSOHESHSSSSSSSSHETHHOESGHHHEHHHEHSHSHHEH BC 25 

Beach Erosion Studies CR 65 

Beach Erosion Literature eeoeeeetoeveoCeocseeoeoe ee eor77e 8% 69 
VOL. 5 


won 


Lae. ne 
fi Dae eh Ate KIM Le DONE G 


ME. AOE A ae te 


Sip E4 84 oe 


Peas AS eae ear eon SRS S| 


Soc MaMa eS Yee fy eee nS, 2a ect Te Mal ed 
1 , af let tote ‘ 


yy ’ AR WMO ORD. Ree, We ewer HEI hae AS PR OL Re 


BRITISH COAST PROTECTION ACT OF 1949 


The purpose of the Coast Protection Act of 1949 is to amend the 
law relating to the protection of the coast of Great Britain against 
erosion and encroachment by the sea, to provide for the restriction 
and removal of works detrimental to navigation, to transfer the 
management of Crown foreshore from the Minister of Transport to the 
Commissioners of Crown Lands, and for purposes connected with the 
foregoing. The more important parts and sections of the act are 
summarized in the following paragraphs. 


Part I 


Section 1. Coast protection authorities are established with 
powers and duties in connection with protection of land in their 
area as are conferred or imposed on such authorities by the act. 
The council of each Maritime county area shall be the coast pro— 
tection authority for that area. 


Section 2. Coast protection boards may be established where 
it appears expedient for the protection of land in any area. Such 
boards shall be the coast protection authority for that area. 
They shall consist of representatives of the council of every maritime 
county area any part which is within the area for which the board 
is constituted and may also include representatives of other af- 
fected bodies or persons. 


Section 3. Any coast protection authority may concur with 
any one or more other coast protection authorities in appointing 
a joint committee of those authorities either for the aggregate 
of the areas of the authorities or for any part thereof. 


Section 4. A coast protection authority is empowered to 
carry out such coast protection work within or outside its area 
as may appear to be necessary of expedient for the protection of 
any land in its area. An authority may acquire any land required 
for the purpose. — 


Section 5. A coast protection authority proposing to carry 
out any coast pretection work, other than maintenance or repair, 
shall publish notice of that proposal. Any person objecting to 
the proposal shall be granted a hearing, after which decision will 
be made by the Minister of Health as to approval, rejection or 
modification of the proposal. Urgently needed protective work 
may be carried out without publication of notice. 


Section 6. Where it appears to a coast protection authority 
that persons interested in land to he protected should pay charges, 
the authority may prepare a plan known as a “works scheme" which 
shall indicate the nature and estimated cost of the proposed work. 


Section 7. Coast protection charges shall be levied against 
land benefiting by the work, as indicated by the works scheme. 
The charges shall not exceed the amount by which the value immediately 
after completion of the works is greater than the value would then 
be if the works had not been undertaken; the works in the future 
to be maintained without expense tc person interested in the land. 


Section 8. <A coast protection authority shall publish notice 
of the preparation of the scheme and serve copies of the scheme on 
owners and occupiers of affected land and on persons on whom charges 
will be levied. Objectors shall be granted a hearing after which 
decision will be made by the Minister of Health as to approval, 
rejection or modification of the scheme. 


Section 9. After approval of a works scheme by the Minister 
of Health, the authority is empowered to take all necessary steps 
for carrying out the work. Land owners have the option of carrying 
out the work themselves upon notice to the authority and subject 
to certain time limitations. 


Section 10. Coast protection charges levied upon a person 
under a works scheme become due on completion of the work and 
service upon him of a notice specifying the amount of the charge, 
or in case of dispute, when the dispute is finally determined. 
Coast protection authorities may declare charges payable in in- 
stallments covering not more than 30 years with interest at such 
rate as may be determined by regulations prescribed by the Minister 
of Health. 


Section 12. A coast protection authority may serve notice of 
needed repairs to protective works on the owner or occupier of 
land. If the repairs are not completed within the specified period 
or if the repairs are urgently needed, the authority may take all 
necessary steps for carrying out the work. 


Section 13. The reasonable cost of maintenance accomplished 
by an authority under section 12 may be recovered from the owner 
of the land, except for works constructed, altered or improved 
under a works scheme. 


Section 14. A coast protection authority may be authorized 
to acquire by compulsory purchase any land which it is authorized 
to acquire under section 4 of the Act. 


Section 16. Any person desiring to carry out coast protection 
work, other than maintenance or repair, must secure the consent 
of the coast protection authority in whose area the work is to be 
carried out. Works constructed,altered or improved without such 
consent, or in contravention of any conditions subject to which 
the consent was granted, may be required to be removed or altered, 


Section 18. The excavation or removal of any materials on or 
forming part of the seashore is unlawful except under licens? 
granted by the coast protection authority for the area, subject 
to such conditions as it may determine. 


Section 19. “here the performance of coast protection work 
by a coast protection authority results in depreciation of land, 
compensation therefor is authorized subject to certain conditions. 


Section 21. The Munister of Health may make grants toward 
any expenditure incurred under the Act by a coast protection 
authority, subject to such conditions as may be determined by the 
Treasury. 


Fart VT 


Part JI contains provisions for the safety of navigation. 
Gonsent of the Minister of Transport must oe secured to construct, 
alter or improve works, deposit or remove objects or materials 
from the seashore so that obstruction or danger to navigation is 
caused or is likely to result. 


WwW 


GENERALIZATION OF THE FORMULA FOR CALCULATION OF 
ROCK FILL DIKES AND VERIFICATION OF ITS COEFFICIENTS 


by 
Ramon Jribarren Cavanilles 
with the collaboration of 
Casto Nogales y Olano 
Highway Engineers 


Published in the Review of Public Works, May 1950, 
Madrid, Spain, as Generalizacion de la formula 
para el calculo de los diques de escollera y 
comprobacion de sus coeficientes, por Ramon 
Iribarren Cavanilles con la colaboracion de Casto 
Nogales y Olano, Ingenieros de Caminos; publicado 
en la Revista de Obras Publicas de Mayo de 1950, 
Madrid, Espana. 


FOREWORD 


The following translation is related to an article 
by the same author which appeared in translation in the 
Bulletin of the Beach Erosion Board, Vol. 3, No. l, 
January 1949. It is published at this time for the 
benefit of American engineers concerned with breakwater, 


jetty, and groin design and as a means of acquainting 
them with Mr. Iribarren's latest thinking on the subject. 
Ths editors of the Bulletin wish to acknowledge the 
kindness of Mr. Ro. O. Eaton, through whose efforts the 
translation was made available. 


The opinions expressed are those of the author and 
not necessarily those of the Beach Erosion Board. 


In the booklet Una formula para el calculo de los diques de 
escollera (A Formula for the Calculation of Rock-fill Dikes), 
published July 1938% there was determined the expression 


Pe NA? a 
(cosa — sinan)3 (d-1)3 
whe re 
P = weight of the individual stones or blocks in kilograms, 
N = 15 for dikes of natural rock fill, 
N = 19 for dikes of artificial block fill, 
A = 2h = total height of the wave that breaks on the dike, 


measured in meters 
*Translated and published in the January 1949 Bulletin of the 
Beach Erosion Board, Office, Chief of Engineers, Department of the 
Army. The coefficient K of that booklet is denoted by N in this 
one, to avoid confusion with K = cothw H, and similarly, the anglea 
we here denote a. Translation was [ made by D. W. Hullinghorst. 


4 


d = specific weight of material of the stones in tons (metric) 
per cubic meter 
a= angle of the dike's side slope with the moraine; 


Before the preliminary determination of those tentative values 
of N, each based only on a single observed case - the natural rock 
fill dike of Orio and the artificial rock fill dike of San Juan de 
Luz —- the booklet also stated: 


"It only remains now to determine the coefficient N and verify 
if it is sensibly constant, as seems to follow from the material 
presented, or varies with the other elements of the formula. 


™In the worst case, a coefficient similar to the classic and 
variable coefficient C of the formula of uniform flow, V = C YR i, 
will be considered," 


In spite of the twelve years intervening, during which the 
reasoning followed for the deduction of the formula has been re- 
fined, in a manner that might have been advantageously taken into 
account by the recent translators of the booklet, the coefficients 
15 and 19 still stand, due to the satisfactory results always ob- 
tained in numerous cases of practical application. 


The formula is actually derived for the upper slope of the 
dikes, and a generalization for-all the depths of the work was 
indicated only tentatively at the end of the booklet. In this 
connection substantially the following was said: 


"This generalization of the formula assumes a certain margin 
. Of security, but it is not logical to apply on the sea the 
strict results obtained from theoretical formulas when on land it 
is usual to multiply them by ample safety factors. 


"I should be most grateful to my colleagues who, acquainted 
in detail with concrete practical cases, would kindly furnish me 
information for refining the coefficients." 


Unfortunately those necessary details of each particular case, 
and especially the damages experienced, are difficult to obtain. 
Therefore, in this study, we are go ing to make special mention of 
one of singular interest. 


We refer to the interesting compilation on the port of Argel 
concerning weights of stones or blocks and their corresponding 
stable slopes at various depths, after repairs of numerous damages 
to deficient slopes. This outstanding compilation was made by 


#In this paper, the ton unit is the metric ton of 1000 kilograms = 
2205 lbs. - Trans. 


Messrs. J. Larras and H. Colin in their article of December 1947 
published in the periodical Travaux. 


The following data are obtained from page 609 of that 
compilation showing the corresponding slopes, depths, and weights. 


of blocks or stones. 
Minimum weight, 
metric tons slope 


Minimum 
Depth, meters 


Materials 


Artificial blocks —5 

Natural stones ollal 
same wld 

Quarry waste By -18 


There can also be adopted, as a stable upper surface slope, 
that of 3/1 formed by 50-ton concrete blocks, adopted for strengthen- 
ing the North dike which, according to the cited article, has 


. withstood perfectly even the worst storm (3 February 1934) ever 


suffered by the port of Argel and which destroyed a large part of 
the Mustafa dike, Likewise, we can adopt the toe depth of 35 
meters, which this North dike reaches, 


The maximum characteristics of waves from that very violent 
storm are known with an approximation acceptable for practical 
purposes, and will be used in comparisons which follow, The wave 
period reached 13 3/4 seconds. The maximum amplitude of a 
beacon buoy** in the exterior of the port was 7 mters, and this 
constitutes an approximate upper limit to the wave height. 


To explain the 9-meter sheets observed passing over the 
parapets of the dikes, it has been conjectured, simply by inertia, 
and abstracting other forces such as those of buoyancy, that the 
amplitude of the vertical movement of the buoy was less than the 
wave height. 


The buoy and whole float of constant horizontal section can be 
likened to a vertical oscillator whose own natural period, was un- 
doubtedly much less than the 13 3/4 seconds of the period of the 
wave. Under these conditions, the maximum vertical amplitude of 
the oscillator, or buoy, must be practically equal to or, better, 
somewhat greater than that of the sea. 


For hypothetical lesser periods of the sea, that might 
approximate the buoy's own natural period the vertical oscillations 
of the buoy, amplified by resonance, would be much greater than 
*% See the view presented to the second question (subject) of the 

second section of the XVI International Congress of Navigation by 
Messrs. M. Benezit and M. Renaud, 
*«i"boya de balizamiento" 


periods even briefer than the buoy's own period, couldth2 buoy's 
oscillations be less than those of the sea. 


For this to have happened, during the observations of the 
storm of Argel to which we refer, it should have been necessary 
that the natural vertical period of the boy itself be significantly 
greater than the 13 3/4 seconds, which we estimate to be impossible 
in a buoy of that type.x 


The maximum height of wave before reaching the dikes was, conse- 
quently, approximately 7 meters or somewhat less, and only on break 
ing over the dikes did this height, amplifieds* by the works 
(structure) itself, reach the order of 9 meters, as is demonstrated 
below. 


Due to the steep side slopes of the rock fill dikes, or rather, 
the short distance (relative to wave length) which the wave traverses 
from the vertical line through the dike toe to the highest point 
reached on the dike, the energy loss must be small, in spite of 
the rock fill roughness, always small relative to the wave length. 
Moreover, even were the energy loss to be appreciable, disregarding 
it only augments correspondingly and conveniently the margin of 
safety. 


In a sense (limited, for a breakwater is not a beach although 
the effects resemble one another for waves of the length under 
consideration), the graphs of our article published in the Revista 
de Obras Piblicas last November, in which the curves corresponding 
to slopes exceeding 10 per cent are almost coincident with those 
from conservation of energy, may serve to verify the smallness of 
such energy loss. 


More authentic verification, of this and other simplifying 
assumptions that are necessitated in these complex subjects, is 
the comparison with actual observations on the dikes of Argel, 
themselves, which we make in the following, 


*  “Boya de balizamiento" 

x* Inclosed in vertical dikes, a similar amplification is produced 
by the structure itself--amplification which in this case makes 
the amplitude of the vertical surface movement, on the wall, 
generally exceed twice the wave height. 

See the booklet Galculo de diques verticales (Calculation of 
Vertical Dikes), also published in July 1938 and translated and 
published in the Bulletin of the Inte-national Navigation Con- 
gress, July 1939. Also see the experimental confirmation of said 
amplification, constituted by Figure 13 and 18 of the article 
of A. Stucky and 1). Bonnard, published in Travaux of January 
1937. The results obtained in those publications are likewise 
admissibly proportioned to the height of wave indicated and its 
corresponding amplification, 


If we designate by Hp the depth of the tce of the slope and by 
Lp» hp, Kp the characteristics* of the wave over the depth Hp; by H 
the depth of the point on the slope that we are considering, and by L, 
h, K, etc., the corresponding characteristics of the wave, and if, for 
the reasons presented, we admit the conservation of energy, one deduces 
immediately: | 


where 


p=7K | = and Pp * {¥p 2 ’ 
p 


deduced from the approximate curve 


h a 28 
ho a 


of figure 22 of the cited report, or from its corresponding table, 
pages 32 and 33. 


The approximate curve can be utilized, neglecting the breaking 
factor /b, because the action cf breaking is so very rapid that 
there ie dnsuf ficient time for its effects to be really produced 
before breaking, and even if this should not be entirely so, as the 
said effects are very similar for all breakings, on being neglected 
they would remain implicitly in the coefficients N, determined by 
direct observation of the phenomena, 


With respect to the generalization of the formula, mentioned at 
the beginning of this study, it is proper to note that for some 
years it has been refined on the basis of the following reasoning; 
and that, although this reasoning also supposes some Simplifications, 
the final result we get will confirm, on comparison with an actual 
case (always the final test in technology), that the degree of ap- 
proximation is also sufficient for practical applications. 


The maximum horizontal particle velocity of the wave (on 
breaking under its limiting conditions, y, = 4/gh,3*) being the 
principal cause of the removal of the stones of the breakwaters, the 
effects of the maximum orbital velocity, also horizontal, correspond- 
ing to any depth 


xBoth these notations and the others can be found in our report pre- 
sented to the fourth communication of the Second Section of the 
XVII International Congress of Navigation. 

xxSee the cited booklet of July 1938, or its translation, and the 
aforementioned report to the Lisbon Congress. 


8 


will be similar to those of a hypothetical, or virtual, wave of 
equal velocity, That is, the equality “max = Yh would have to 
hold, or in orther words, 


Wr =z fen! =fe AM G 
We 2 


The semiperiod being 


Ps) eae 


g 
immediately one obtains the height of the virtual wave: 


Aly sh 2s 2.9rie re 


Seen 3 


LK 
which, introduced in place of A in the formula, thus generalizing 
it, permits us to calculate the slope or weight of the stones at 
the depth under consideration, 
Likewise, since 


Ke Scaling! th LK ita, 


and r in contact with the slope face 


ASL TE Aga) h 9 
Shia 
one obtains 
Moe) 12 Mike : 
Loi Shfig E 


The inclination of the slope, and other circumstances, could in-~ 
fluence all this somewhat, but not varying much from one dike 

to another, its influence would also remain implicitly in the 
coefficients which, as has been indicated, are determined by 
direct observation. 


As confirmation of all that has been presented, and has 
been applied for several years on numerous works that have 
resisted satisfactorily violent storms, we are going to apply 
it to the authentic and interesting case of the dikes at Argel 
on which for the reasons presented, we can soundly begin with: 


Hy = 35 m.5 A, =2 hy = 7m, 


2 Ly = 1056 (27) = 1.56 x 13.75% = 295 ms L, = 147.5 m. 


fe) 
For various values. of the depth H, measured from the mean level 
of movement, we obtain the informtion shown in Table 1. 


The curves of variation of A' and 2h as functions of the 
depth H, referred to the mean level of movement, are shown in 
Figure 1, in which also are drawn the curves of surface super- 
elevations Sj and the line of theoretical breaking H = h, 
corresponding to steep slopes of the rock-fill dikes.x 


The point of intersection of this straight line with the 
curve 2h determines for us the height of 9.70 meters of the 
wave on breaking over the dike, approximating, though somewhat 
‘greater than, the 9 meters adopted by the Argel engineers. 


In Figure 2 are shown the wave heights 2h referred to the 
level of the calm sea, H, = H = Sp, the superelevations S, 
taken into account, and the corresponding curve that gives us 
the virtual heights A', which we mst take into account for the 
calcuation of the dike in its submerged zones, 


The type section of the dikes of Argel, sanctioned by 
very long experience and deduced from the interesting table 
compiled by MM. LarrAds and Colin, is that indicated by the solid 
line in Figure 3. 


If, in a given zone, the slope of a dike is steeper than 
that required for equilibrium or stability, settling will result 
during storms, which, flattening the slope, will tend to adapt 
it to said equilibrium. It is, therefore, logical to make 
the corresponding confirmations, determining by means of 
theoretical calculations and the coefficients which it is 
desired to compare with actuality, the slopes corresponding to 
the points or zones whose characteristics are known through pro- 
longed direct observation, 


For this, from the formla 
P = N a3d 
(cop & - sin a)? (d-1)? 


x Note the section h, Rotura de las olas (Breaking of the Waves) 
page 26 et seq., of the cited report presented to the XVII 
International Congress of Navigation, convened in Lisbon. 


10 


0,2373 


1,3231 


222,96 


0,9211 


34,77 | 31,25 


34,80 


Table | 


0,1898 


1,4382 


205,03 


0,9372 


27,72 | 24,18 


Table 


0,1424 


1,6160 


182,55 


0,9690 


0,93 


0,38 


20,62 


0,32 


20,68 


2 


11 


0,1187 


1,7460 


168,92 


0,9951 


1,25 


0,46 


17,02 


151,75 


1,032 


7,84 


1,78 


0,61 


13,39 


0,0712 


2,1964 


134,31 


1,088 


8,27 


2,78 


0,0237 


3,7128 


79,47 


1,379 


10,48 


14,96 


Depth H referred to the mean elevation in movement, in meters 


Protundidad 4 referida al W.M. en movimento er m. 


2h, A’ and Sp in meters 
2h, ne os i Mm. 
MTA i 2h le A 9 10 1 i213 th 6m 


10 


a Oahcabo ich MisIEe) 
er ar, NG CE I” 
ie BP el ed of on ig oli wt a 


16 Terhade | ooh oe leclbey PORT OF ARGEL 


Increment of fhe height 
18 of wave over the batter 


20 err tte aie t oes virtual wove 


on submerged 
parler e oo ec 


A 
30 | Aura de ola virtual er faluges 


| sure, vdos HORE Attire seco rente ey cre nay 
creed | 


35 
oe of wave approaching the dike.. .. 2hp = 7 meters 
Altura oe ola gue aborda el adique 2hp=7 m. 


Altura de ole 6/ romper sobre e/ dique— 2h = 9.70 m. 


Height of wave on breaking ver the dike.......2h = 9.70 meters 


Figure | 


12 


Depth H-, referred to the elevation of the calm sea, in meters 


frofundidad Hr referida al N.M. en reposo, en mM. 


2h, A’ and Spin meters 
2h, A’ y Sh en mm. 
Ci le Cie whe iG AGT. BY OO, TIE Bie 15 4 15 


ine: 2h=9.7m]) © 


2 <7 = hotura: 2h=9.7 71. 

, 

6 

8 

10 

see ee aa 

Pay aes 

De 
ar i Weber lle |e 
ae BG a a 


6 a 


20 


a Ve 
PRE E eo ME EE i ae 
le | 
FRE) Ua SAA 
PUERTO DE ARGEL 
28 |__ PORT OF ARGEL 


Alturas de olg referidas al N.M.en repose 


N 
& 


Height of wave approaching the dike uae 2hp = 7m 
Altura de ola que aborda el dique- 2hp =7 MM. 


Allura oe ola af romper sobre e/ ee =9.70 mM. 
Height of wave on breaking. over the dike......2h=9.70m 
Figura 2. 


Figure 2 


13 


€ sunbi4 


‘€ emaiy 
‘w0l6=42—enlip je asmos saiwas je 30 ap B/mly SF 
wL-%y2 antip ja epsoge anb B0 ap eIny 
$J9j9W O2'G = UZ — OxX!P ayy JaAao Bulyoasq uO aADM jo j4YybIaH Pra 
ssojow 2 =< 942 —eyIp ay Bbuly200sddo 9a0m jo 4yybIaH ott 
of 
i a 
a4S0OM KJIONOH gn 
esayue2 ap soysay ft See 
a7 ile 
-50) 
“ort 
“a? + 
ere ei 
SuO} JiJjaw | — SaUojs jOIN,ON WE 
“Wf [ - SAJBEINEU $0/UB7 aia! 
G : SE 1] 
SUO} I1JJIW y - SAUDIS JOINJON BA ie Ee at i fea iene ns peers enor Serta ROG 
‘Wy Y- SAJLINJEU SOULI Pa a!josd 0914aIOaY L 
TEL (uljod puD S04J07 WW oO 6uipso29D) Sajifosd |ajqDiS 
>7 i= 
SUO} DIJAW OG - $x90Iq 1O19IgHIy pa 13949” JO LYOd 
"uy os- sejerumie soning As oi Sy HI 
ee (uyog K sexier WH unbas) 2/92/88 1JaJ 
SOC OU ON OS Daz UIT ee Hes 7394V 30 OLUINd 


‘ay os -saypelnyupse satibojg ——<==—— 


a WE oy WSs * 
19 ut Nou OCs = rs 
oasor tn) Das WIDD ayy Jo uvOKoAa!y IS002s LA WH 


we deduce 


from which, the last member being known, immediately we deduce 
the batter cta that enables us to draw the theoretical profile, 
in order to compare it in Fieure 3 with that determined by 
nature e 


Thus, we obtain for the batter of the upper 50 tonx concrete 
blocks: 


cta-1 = 9.7 %igx2.36 = 0.688 
ofl + cle 1.36 50,000 


whence the batter ct aw = 3.51 


For the rock fill of artificial blocks situated below the 
dspth H, = -5 meters, referred to the calm level, we obtain 


eta -l =5.6 3fi9 x 2.36 = 0.397 


yl + Cte 1.36 50,000 
whence the batter is cte = 1.83. 


For the natural rock fill situated below H, = -ll m: 


ete MEETS 12/5120 3/15 x 2.7 = 0.293 , 
Vl + ote a 1.7 4000 


whence the batter is cba =1.53. 


For that situated below H, = -l4m: 


cts 2) 70 ea (sixes 0.343 
Vl + ct-« 1.7 1000 


or the batter is ct & = 1.67. 
For the deep zone -H, 2 18 m, composed of the quarry waste 
whose weight will vary from 1000 kilograms to a small minimum 


weight, the weight of the stones obtained for the fixed batter, 
ct &@ = 2, would be 


P=15 x1.15?x 2.7. 2143 ke, 
1\3 
(73) «1.77 
% Metric ton, 1000 kg = 2205 lbs. 


SUB) 


very acceptable for a weight of stones that, as has been indicated 
can range downward from 1000 kg to a small weight, and whose in- 
dividual stones of weight less than 143 kg placed near the upper 
part would descend down the slope, so that by this process, and 
surely without subsidence of importance, the surface would become 
constituted of stones cof greater weight. 


The necessary weight of stones at the foot of the dike, where 
the height of virtual wave is 0.39 m, would be only 


Pp =15 x 0.30°x 2.7 = 5.6 ke. 
PE ae 
(ye) 2-7 
The theoretical profile is obtained in this way and is 
indicated by the broken line in Figure 3, whose approximation to 
the real profile is already very satisfactory. But, if instead 
of adopting as height of incident wave its upper limit = 7 m; 
deduced from oscillations of the buoy, we assume the maximum 
height of wave of 9 m adopted by the engineers of Argel, we ob- 
tain Table 2, similar to the preceding and corresponding to a 


height 2 = 6.45 m, determined after several trials, so tha 
the maximum height of wave on breaking should be the 9 m cited. 


Figure 1' similar to Figure 1, confirms that, in effect, 
the height of wave at breaking is 9.05 meters, that is, practically 
the same as 9 m. 

In Figure 2! similar to Figure 2, are determined the height 
of virtual waves, A', corresponding to the various depths, in 
which, again by analogous procedure, we obtain the following 
batters; ; 


For the surface slope of 50 ton concrets blocks: 


ic ale1 2] Gh0s  iGpamoT = O-Ga 
nih emer les Vy 50000 


whence, the batter should be ctb@ = 3.04 


For the rock fill of artificial blocks situated below the 
depth Hy = —5m: 


cha-1 =5,0 %/19x 2.4 20.346 


fi + ct2x 1.4 V 50,000 
whence the batter should be ct@ =1.68 


For the natural rock fill situated below H, = -1l m; 


16 


Depth H referred to the mean elevation in movement, in meters 


Frofundidad H referida al N.M. en movimiento, en m. 


2h, A' and §, in mters 


ito Sh He 
ON eA) WON A i O78. 10 tf 2 ss 6 


2 ee eee 
ee eee See 
ges ete tre emf o| wir 


rroredent of the O BE ARGEL over 
the er o the dike 
[TTT asi 2 ae 
5OUL falud def argue aaa) ONSEN is 
32 bee Altura de ola vitlual en t3ludes 
| Hei f virtual ¥ 


Height of wave ae the dike Sdcc6 2 hp = 6.45 meters 
Altura de ols que abarda e/ dique ely = 6.45 mM. 


Mura de ola &# ronper sobre ef digue.,.2 
Height of wave on breaking 6 Lag: ee = ILS Mo 
Figura 1’. 


9.05 meters 


17 


the elevation of the calm sea, in meters 


Depth Mil referres i: 


Frofundidad Hr referida al N.M. en reposo, en m 


2h, A' and S) in meters 


2h; A’ y Sp en m7. 
) fo ND RNS 6 RB MS NOL NT) ONION, RAO Meh a inl Catt Ohne LoD 


a are = 


10 
i fen 
72 nian 


th +4 Bid 


30 TF Tabi to] 5 eee Alturasde ola referidas al N.M. en reposo 
Le Sept has [asker | Wave Ca: referred to elevation of 
S2\ul the calm e 


Height of wave approaching the dike ... 2hp = 6.45 m 


Altura de ols gue storda el aque. 2hp =6.45 17. 


Altura de ols af romper sobre el oique_ 2h- 9.05 M. 
Height of wave on breaking over the dike... 2h = 9.05 m. 


Figura 2. 


18 


Giro el) = 195) Sexier = 0.248 
Vl + ct-e 1.7 4000 


whence the batter should b8 cta = 1.43 


For that situated below H,, = —- 14 me 


G2 Ge) a WS, Te) ee MP 4 Oe 
dey 1.7 1000 


whence the batter should be cta@ =1.51. 


For the deep zone H, = - 18 m, one obtains a weight: 
a ae P< 1,002 x.2.7 |= 94 kilograms 
i, \e 
[> x Lae 


likewise quite acceptable, and the weight corresponding to the 
toe of ths dike will be: 


= 15 x 0.332 x 2.7 = 3.4 kilograms. 
7 \ 3} 
FF x 1.72 


In this way we obtain a theoretical profile, shown in Figure 3! 
Similar to 3, even more closely approximting the real profile; but 
the really interesting fact is that both figures, whose calculated 
wave heights differ by less than 8 per cent, a degree of approxima- 
tion that we consider difficult for anything practical to really ex- 
xeed, are now authentically confirmed by the very important direct 
observation from this interesting compilation. It is also now con- 
firmed undoubtedly, through authentic direct observation and despite 
the simplifications one is forced to introduce into the complex 
subjects of maritime engineering, that the degree of approximtion 
really obtained is superior to that of many calculations of 
engineering on terrestrial subjects, in which, even legally there 
are imposed large safety factors, generally greater than two and 
frequently approximating three. 


In the rock fill dikes the proportional increase of cost 
occasioned by these always convenient safety factors would not ‘be 
greater than that for terrestrial works, and moreover, their cost 
would be recovered in no long time, on the basis that, by placing 
somewhat heavier stones or blocks the movements and consequent 
expenditures diminish and thus very costly outlays for mintenance 
are saved. 


For these reasons it seems advisable, despite the very 
satisfactory confirmation just made and which one must remember 
refers to the strict equilibrium limit, to adopt at least a re- 
duced factor of safety of 1.5 on the coefficients N, so that they 


19 


“£ emai 


sl8qol 60°66 = US °° OXTp ouy JOAO JuTyeeiq uo SAeM JO TUsToR 
W506 = 42 anbIp fa 21908 Jatluas /@ 80 ap Binyy 
‘W 59'9= y2——enkip ja epsoge anb Yo 3p enyy Zz 
oa 
slejeu 67°9 = dyz** extp 6uy dutyoeoidde saem jo ys TeYy G24 
a 
ao 
eqsem Lrzend Wee 
CSWUEI FO sopsay + -jle 
et 
SE 
ae 
ao 
ao 
ee 
= z a 7 
HOR OF 7 BNET IIN as oa 
: \ 
= ge sug SU = SOUOIS TEIN FEN - ae 
WW #- SOJEINJEU SaJUeZ d oie 
suo} Of4ZeU OG — SHOOTQ [LeLOLTyTqIaAV BA “-* -=+=+aTT youd [eot1 e10s8uy, 
oO a, 
wy og-sejernyyse sanboyg gh (ut[O9 pue seqizeT WA 04 dsutpz000e8) seTTjoud etqeqs 
ZL = ODM [lsd 
A uiyjog A sesse7 wy ungas) 298158 la 
/2TIZ eu OS - SHOOT TeToOTsTIAV = 
Bu04 L0G -SHYOWIYIE Sai oy, iis TI9aV FO OLYTNd 
=) = ee UG 52! “908 [as1y jo 410g 
(ore onal gnbiD *  osodas Le o1pau arly ™ 


ees WTed |yy Jo uoTyeASTT 


20 


would be raised to 29 and 23, respectively, for the artificial 
blocks and natural stones. 


More, really, than the weight of these blocks or stones, this 
increase would affect the batters of the projects, flattening them 
a little, and it should be remembered that the said reduced safety 
factor of 1.5 would only suppose a margin of </1.5 = 1.15 in the 
wave height or in the size of stones. 

In any event, and with respect for strict economy, one can 
neglect said reduced safety factor, continuing to use the primitive 
coefficients of 15 and 19 on large dikes where the stones are 
carefully placed to a considerable depth, provided that the in- 
crease of wave height produced by the work itself is always 
calculated following the indicated procedure. 


On the other hand, and to simplify the calculations on the 
smaller dikes, said factor of 1.5 can be adopted, that is, 
coefficients N equal to 23 and 29, on the dikes whose stones are 
carefully placed to a lesser depth, and by virtue of this pre- 
caution being able to take the incident wave height rather than 
the height of wave that breaks over the dike, as already indicated 
textually in 1938. 


The theoretical relative breaking depths, deduced from the 
cited table and the curve 1K of of Figure 22 of the report, 
eing H = 0.03, to which a wave height amplification 
Ty 
factor of 1.3 applies, it will be possible to calculate a rock 
fili dike on the basis ef the incident wave height and adopting 
the cited coefficients 29 or 23 that include the safety factor 
1.5, whenever the relative depth of its toe is less than H = 0.06, 
Lo 
corresponding to the amplification factor of the cited curve 
ape = 1.13, or whenever the depth of careful placing of the stone 
= 
of the dike is tess than H xl = 0.06 x 250 = 15 meters on our 


Cantabrian coasts, or x L, = 0.06 x 150 = 9 meters on the 


H 
ify 


Mediterranean coasts. 


As was made a matter of record in the XVII International 
Congress of Navigation convened in Lisbon, it is also highly 
satisfactory that the formula deduced in the American report of 
Epstein and Tyrrel for reflecting rock fill dikes, starting 
from our expression for pressures of refiection P,, = CV *, is 


Fay 


* Ses the cited report Calcuktion of Vertical Dikes (Caiculo de 
diques verticales). 


ao Soe SS ~~ g 
a 


21 


similar to that which we obtained in 1938 for breakwater dikes. 


In effect, the American formula is: 


P. = Ry 5H- 
5 


and ours; 


Naa 
P = oe 
(cosa - sinoc)? (d-1)? 
in which 
Py, = P = weight of the individual stones 
H =A = 2h = wave height 
Ss =4d = relative density of the material 
M = natural batter of the rock fill=—1 


tan @ = slope of the rock fill 
Ry and N being the coefficients. 


aR 
i} 


Expressing the American formula in our notation, it becomes: 


1 Je costec aa 
(cosa - sin a )? (d-1)3 ; 
which is ours except only that it includes the factor cos“m in ths 
coefficient. 


It is a matter of record that on establishing our formula it 
was already indicated, that the coefficient should be able to vary 
with the data of the problem. 


Practically the angle o , which varies most for the upper 
part of the dike, will not vary much, for from cotana,=3, correspond— 
ing to present rock fill dikes, it cannot get much steeper than cotan 
@, = 2, even in the reflecting dikes, because of the enormous 
weight of the stones this necessitates. Between those mximum 
limits the relation is: 


cos? ©1 ile 


cos 3 & 2 


which would represent only a small difference in the weight of 
the stones and even less in their size, whose relation would be 

1.2 =1.06. Only direct observation can determine properly N 
or R.> including cases of very steep batters. 


Concerning this last coefficient, it should be indicated 
that the expression for it determined in the American report can 
have reality only when the protecting blanket is made up of 
parallelopiped blocks perfectly aligned, with their three 
dimensions horizontal, normal to the slope, and following the line 


22 


of maximum slope, it being precisely under these theoretical con- 
ditions, of reduced joints, when the calculating procedure follow- 
ed, based on internal pressures which must be transmitted through 
those joints, lacks applicability. If the blocks move through 

any cause or settlement, the cited three theoretical dimensions 

no longer really exist, the coefficient R, becoming the N determined 
only on the basis of the overall dimension of the Stone. 


Although only under the heading of curiosity, it is also inter- 
esting to compare the results obtained for the theoretical value A! 
= 27 xf with the practical results pertaining to the limiting 

LK 
velocities of erosion on the bottom of a canal, whose bed we 
suppose horizontal, that is to say@® = 0, and the formla that 
gives us the weight of the individual stones would be: 


P= ma 
(d - 1)3 


as 
RO 3 Bier 
LK 


we get 


and since 


pmax= Wr and T =/9 IK 


one obtains 


P= 8Nav ee 


g? (d-1)3 


Applying this formla for the velocity in the canal, y max = 

1 meter/second, and with a mean specific weight of material that 
constitutes the individual stones or grains of d = 2.6 metric tons/ 
m-, one obtains: 


ped 8) 98 TLS) be nl) x 16 = 0.081 kilogram, 
9.813 x 1.67 


which represents a cube of side: 


: = (oo = 0.081 = 0.03 meter, 
1000 d 2600 


23 


- dimension of gravel whose order of magnitude is still in accord 
with observed reality for said limiting velocity of erosion, on 
“horizontal bottoms, of 1 m/sec, in spite of the enormous ex- 
trapolation made, which it would not be permissible to carry on 
indefinitely. The formla gives acceptable results, without 
“modifying the constants from those applying to stones or blocks of 
several .tons weight,to these gravels that don't weigh 100 grams. 


As a consequence of the foregoing, we estimate that we have 
confirmed authentically, through direct observations which always 
constitute the definitive ratification of these matters of techno- 
logy, the generalization of the formula and the valuss of its 
coefficients, despite the simplifications whose introductions in 
these complex subjects are unavoidable. 


ANNOUNCEMENT OF PUBLICATION 


The Beach Erosion Board announces the publication of its 
Technical Memorandum No. 21, "The Interpretation of Crossed 
Orthogonals in Wave Refraction Phenomena". Copies are being 
miled to those individuals and institutions on the mailing list 
for technical publications. 


A limited number of copies are available for distribution 


upon request to the President, Beach Erosion Board, Corps of 
Engineers, 5201 Little Falls Road, N. W., Washington 16, D. C. 


24 


APPLICATION OF .ASPHALT IN HYDRAULIC 
ENGINEERING WORKS 
by 


Jo He van der Burgt 


FOREWORD 


The following translation was furnished the Beach 
Erosion Board by the author following a recent visit to 
the Unitea States. It is published here to acquaint 


American engineers with Dutch progress in the use of asphalt 
mixtures for shore protection works. The paper has been 
abridged to permit publication in the Bulletin. The 
opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author 
and not necessarily those of the Beach Erosion Board. 


Introduction 


The extensive application of synthetic asphalt in road con- 
struction work started around 1923, whereas it took another ten 
years before this material was applied to any extent in hydraulic 
engineering works. This is caused by the fact that the almost 
horizontal road surface encased by the shoulders, was ideal for 
testing the new and rather unstable material, whereas the sloping 
surfaces of hydraulic works were highly unsuitable for this purpose. 


The share of the Netherlands in the research work regarding 
the application of asphalt in road construction and hydraulic works, 
has been appreciable. Extensive research done by the Rijkswegen- 
bouwlaboratorium at Scheveningen and the Research Laboratory of the 
Royal Shell at Amsterdam, combined with thorough testing and ob-— 
servation during the execution of ssphalt-works have led to such 
control of the properties of asphaltic bitumen and bituminous 
mixtures, that now it is possible to use this very durable product 
appropriately on sloping surfaces, even on steep slopes. 


Asphaltic Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures 


The asphaltic bitumen is derived to a small extent from 
natural sources and synthetically made on a large scale. 


The well known natural asphalt from Trinidad is a rather 
impure product, which is unfit for use in hydraulic works, as the 
enclosed clay-particles are affected by water. 


The synthetic asphaltic bitumen is derived from petroleum. 
The remaining product becomes harder as more oily components are 
evaporated during the process of distillation. 


xComposed after a lecture, given by the author on 10 Dec 1948 for 
guests and members of the V.B.W. (Association of Bituminous Works) 


25 


The asphaltic bitumen consists of tiny carbon particles ap- 
proximately of equal size called micelles, which might be imagined 
as floating in an oily medium. The stability of the bitumen cepc nes 
on the ratio of micelles and medium, Addition of a filler, i%e., 
a finely ground non-hygroscopic product increases the stability of 
the bitumen because, according to Professor Nellensteyn, the finest 
particles of the filler form new micelles, thus increasing the bind- 
ing properties of the asphaltic bitumen. 


Dependent on the kind of work, the asphaltic bitumen must meet 
certain standards, which are specified in the instructions for test- 
ing bituminous construction materials (K.V.B.B.). One of the most 
important points in the testing of asphaltic bitumen and asphalt 
mixtures for hydraulic works is the detemination of the softness of 
the material, which is measured by the degree of softness or the 
penetration index. ‘ 


Asphalt mastic or asphalt cement is the name of the mixture of 
asphaltic bitumen and filler. 

Asphalt mortar or sand asphalt is the name of the mixture of 
asphalt mastic and sand. 

Asphalt concrete is the name of the mixture of asphalt mortar 
with gravel or broken stone. 


In using asphalt mixtures which are to be transported over a 
certain distance, one should take care to heat and preferably isolate 
the containers, whereas for liquid mixtures the solid materials 
should be kept in suspension by a special stirring device. 


Standards for Asphaltic Ritumen and Asphalt Mixtures 


For hydraulic works asphaltic bitumen and asphalt mixtures 
should meet the following standards: 


1. Remain plastic, even after cooling down slightly; 

2. Be sufficiently elastic, even at low temperatures, so 
that the material will follow if the underlying base 
settles unevenly; 

3. Remain stable upon a slope, even above the water sur- 
face and at high temperatures; 

4. Be proof against oxidation; 

5. Stick to clean and dry surfaces; 

6. Be proof against aggressive water (salt water, swamp 
water, etc.); 

7. Be proof against abrasion by sand; 

8, Be proof against wave action. 


The combination of elasticity and stability mentioned under 2 
and 3 can hardly be expected in any material, but it has been 
proven that a satisfactory compromise can be achieved. 


Of course it depends entirely on the kind of work for which 
the material is to be used, which of the above mentioned properties 
should be predominant or whether any other standards should be met. 


26 


General Review on the Application of Asphalt Mixtures 


For hydraulic works the asphaltic bitumen is mostly used ina 
mixture, in which the percentage of the expensive asphaltic bitumen 
is kept as low as possible. The other materials such as the filler 
(partly), sand, gravel and broken stone are natural products, the 
gradation of which greatly influences the quality of the mixture. 
Therefore, to efficiently obtain reliable results, laboratory con- 
trol and information are of great value. 


In working with asphalt mixtures, one should keep the 
temperature as high as possible until the job is reached. Care 
should be taken that no superheating occurs, since then the 
asphaltic bitumen will be cracked, which means that free carbon is 
formed, changing the mechanical properties unfavorably. 


In many instances wnere hydraulic works are constructed the 
water can be retained temporarily so that the asphalt mixture can 
be applied on a dry base. In other areas subject to tidal- and 
wave-action it often occurs that the job must be completed within 
a short period of time and the mixture has to be applied to a wet 
base or even under water. In the latter case one cannot depend 
on adhesion and special measures must be takem in order to carry 
the asphalt mixture into place at the required temperature. The 
recent experiments in the 1st kercsene-harbour at Rotterdam, 
where a plastic mixture was carried to its destination through 
isolated tubes, indicated that it is quite possible that this 
material can even be applied under water. Certainly, the last 
word regarding these problems has not been said yet, but by 
proper cooperation between the research institutes and those who 
design and execute hydraulic work bitumen is being used, 
the solution of these problems can definitely be found. 


Gola anc Hot Asphait 


Asphaitic bitumen is used in hydraulic works as coid asphalt 
and as hot asphait. 
Hot asphalt may be used in; 


1. Permeable works. 


ic bitumen 


1c 


a. by penetration with pure asphai 
b. by penetration with asphalt mas 
Ge by sheeting with bituminous sand 


u 
+ 
iv) 


2. Impermeable works. 


a. by surface-treatment, with pure asphaltic bitumen 
do. by sheeting with asphalt mortar (sand asphalt) 

ce. by sheeting with asphalt concrete 

d. by grouting with pouring asphalt. 


27 


Cold Asphalt 


This material is liquid at normal temperatures as a result of 
the addition of certain volatile components which evaporate and thus 
cause the mixture to stiffen gradually. Therefore, as a rule this 
material cannot be used under water or in thick layers as it remains 
soft. It would be worth while to improve the quality of this pro- 
duct, because it may prove of great value where hot asphalt cannot 
be used or where repairs must be carried out. Cold asphalt was 
used in 1936 at a trial section on the outer slope of the north 
east polder dike near Urk. 


Cold asphalt grouting containing 16% of asphalt emulsion, 25% 
of cement, 53% of sand and 6% of water was applied at normal 
Amsterdam level (N.A.P.). On eachsquare meter of the basalt stone 
slope protection 19 kg of grouting material containing 3 kg of 
asphalt emulsion were used. This grouting was often submerged and 
almost constantly subject to wave action and has gradually vanished. 


Hot Asphalt 


This product has been used in various compositions both below 
and above the water surface. 


To apply thin layers (surface treatment with pure asphaltic 
bitumen or asphalt mastic) above water, a dry and dust free base 
is essential for good adhesion. For thick layers (sheeting with 
bituminous sand, asphalt mortar or asphalt concrete) a stable 
mixture is required, which often should be elastic as well. 


On a wet base or under water there will never be any ad-— 
hesion between the base and the bituminous material and therefore 
the mixture should be carried to its destination in such a way 
that the internal heat is preserved as long as possibie. This 
can be achieved by applying the material in solid masses of sub- 
stantial size, for instance by the aid of clamshells, shoots or 
isolated tubes. Thus, even under water the masses will stick 
together where they touch, because the surfaces which cooled 
will be reheated by the radiation from the centre. Thanks to 
this phenomenon asphalt grouting may penetrate deeply (1 to 1.5m 

under water). This is necessary, not only to envelop the 
stone in order to anchor it safely to its base, but also to fill 
the cavities. In works along the seashore this is imperative 
in order to insure that the wave and groundwater action does not 
result in internal water and air pressures which may have a 
disastrous effect. If the voids between the stones are too small, 
the bitumen or the mixture cools off too rapidly and there will 
be little penetration, resulting in unsound work. Therefore, the 
kind of works and the forces to be resisted determine to what 
extent the cavities should be filled. Hspecially in sea-work one 
should be on the alert against being penny-wise and pound-foolish. 


28 


If the asphalt mixture travels freely through the water over 
a certain distance or is exposed to wave action while it is being 
poured, the mixture will change into a porous mass which hardly 
penetrates at all, with unreliable work as a result. It has been 
found that in poor mixture which are submerged permanently or 
regularly, the film of asphaltic bitumen which covers the particles 
is gradually replaced by water, causing the mixture to lose its co- 
herence and fall apart. Since it is impossible to coat the wet layer 
of porous material with an impermeable layer of asphaltic bitumen 
or tar, it is recommended that a sufficiently rich mixture be 
chosen initially for layers which are constantly or regularly sub- 
merged by water. 


In the following description of works executed with the use 
of hot asphalt, the above-mentioned points will further be dis- 
cussed where necessary. 


Works Executed with the Use of Hot Asphait 


Since hot asphalt has been used in a great many hydraulic works, 
it is impossible to give a complete record in this short review. 
Therefore only a description of a number of applications will be 
given for the following constructions. 


° 


bank protection along canals 

impermeable sheeting of the wetted profile of canals 
impermeable sheeting of weirs 

bank protection along rivers 

slope protection along sea shores 

mattresses 

reinforcement of beach groins and harbour-—dams. 


° 


° 


° 


° 


NOAWE Ww NE 


° 


The original translation contained discussions of the first 
four types of works; these have been deleted in this presentation. 


Slope Protection Along the Sea-shore 


The following applications of asphaltic bitumen or asphalt 
mixtures have been made. 


Trial Section on the Outer Slope of the "Northeast Polder" Dike 
Near Urk 1936 


At this trial section (total area of 2000 m) tests were 
made in cooperation with and under control of the Research Lab-— 
oratory of the Royal Shell at Amsterdam. The slope of the dike 
ranged from 124 at the bottom to 1:3 at the top, separated by a 
5 m terrace at about 2.00 m + N.A.P. (Normal Amsterdam Level). 


Test la. Penetration of macadam with pure asphaltic bitu- 
mene The area extends from +2.00 to +3.50 m (Normal 
Amsterdam Level) and is covered respectively by a layer 
of set bricks, an 8 cm layer of dumped rubble stone 
and an 8 cm layer of compacted broken stones of 3-5 
cm. This last layer was penetrated with 9 kg/m@ 


29 


asphaltic bitumen 60/70 covered with a 1, 5 cm layer 
of broken stones of 1-2 cm which was treated in turn 
with a surface treatment of 3 kg/m2 asphaltic bitumen 
60/70 and finally protected by a 1.5 cm compacted cover 
of broken stones of 1-2 cm. This protection has served 
well although attack3d heavily during southwest gales. 


Test lb. Penetration of macadam with asphalt mstic. The 
area has approximately the same cover as described under 
1. It reaches from N.A.P. to 3.50 m+N.A.P.. The 
lower part is subject to wave action daily. Bulges 
have formed in this lower part, the cause of which is 
unknown. Possibly sand was deposited between the rubble 
stones during the construction. Water may have accumu- 
lated in this sand creating a2pressure behind the 
impermeable cover. Since the voids in the rubble stone 
are rather small anyway, it is imperative that care be 
taken to prevent sand and fine material filling the 
voids. 


It seems undesirable to use the procedures des- 
cribed under 1 and 2 under less favorable conditions 
although they did prove satisfactory under the circum- 
stances of the tests. 


Test 2d. Grouting of set stone with pouring asphalt. 
Three areas were covered, reaching from N.A.P. to 
+0.90 and +2.00 m N.A.P. respectively. The stones were 
set in the usual way, after which the spaces were filled 
with rubble stone, gravel and sand to 8 cm from the 
surface. Then the sides of the stones’were treated 
with a cold bituminous priming coat, after which the 
spaces were filled with pouring asphalt to 2 cm from 
the surface. The pouring asphalt consisted of 43, 3% 
DX 10, 4.7% asbestos fiber 2-4 mm and 52% sand 0-2 mn. 
Twenty-two kg per square meter of pouring asphalt 
wereused, containing 9.5 kg of asphaltic bitumen. 
The lower parts of the spaces were kept open to let 
the water pass freely and thus prevent the building up 
of pressure under the layer. 


This construction appears to be very solid, has 
served well, and seems sound and economical at ex- 
posed slopes. 


Protection of the Dune Foot of the "Green Beach" at Terschelling 
1937 (Figure 1) 


In 1937 the beach near the dune foot at one end of the 


"Green Beach" at Terschelling was repaired and protected after it 
had been damaged by the sea during high tides. The beach was 


30 


SECTION OF REVETMENT 


Lime grass 


Clay layer 
“20 thek 


Clay shells 


LOCATION MAP— WESTERSCHELLING 


GREEN BEACH 


WADDENZEE 
Revetment 


Constructed 1937 


Figure 1. Protection of the "Green Beach" at Terschelling. 


31 


covered with a © cm layer of so-called shell-clay, which is a 
natural deposit often found in the Wadden-sea, containing clay and 
shells and being slightly permeable. Three layers of compacted 
broken basalt stone (3-5 em) were placed upon this, each of which 
was penetrated with pure asphaltic bitumen 60/70. Although the 
cambered slope was rather flat, the construction proved unstable 
and slides occurred. Saeieeely high ground water pressure under the 
construction was the main reason for this failure since a high 
range of dunes was near. The bituminous protection was removed 
after some years and replaced by a brick pavement on shell-clay. 


Repairs On the Outer Slope of the Westkapel Seadike 1946-47, 
(Figure 2) 


The Westkapel sea dike was badly damaged during the 
struggle for Walcheren by bomb and shell explosions over a 
section north of the gap which was made in 1944. This damage 
was spreading gradually under the action of high tides. 


Part of the slope protection was repaired with concrete; else- 
where pouring asphalt was used extensively to form a protection in 
a Quick and efficient maou of the loose stones which were pre- 
sent on the slope. 


Furthermore, part of the slope was protected at the top by 
a layer of rubble stone penetrated with asphalt. 


Test lb. Penetration of rubble stone with asphalt mastic. 
Area IV, from +5.00 to +7.25 m N.A.P. was protected 
by a 0.20 m layer of dumped rubble stone, penetrated 
with asphalt mastic (15% bitumen, 7% filling and 78% 
sand), in such a way that an impervious asphalt cover 
was obtained at the surface. 


The rubble stone layer was filled ge a depth of 
10 em by 110 kg of asphalt mixture per m2 (Figures 3 
and 4). In order to prevent the spaces in the rubble 
stone being filled with water which might create a 
dangerous pressure, the penetrated section was sealed 
at the top by an asphalt coffer. This construction 
has proved satisfactory, but it cannot resist water 
pressure from beneath. 


Test 2d. Grouting of set stone and dumped stone with 
pouring asphalt. 


In 1946 an area was repaired by simply arranging 
the old and worn basalt stones in a more or less 
orderly manner and filling the voids with pouring 
asphalt. As the voids were large (50%) an average of 


32 


Cwest Kapelic 
WALCHEREN 


ASFALT BITUMEN 99/65 
FILLER 
SAND 


“PEARL” GRAVEL 


G.HW=160* 


Se 
GLW:I7 
Slope protection | i Basalt stone set and | Bepteles | 
Of basalt stone | grouted with asphalt. | gicuted 
stone 
i pele 


sl 


Figure 2. Reinforcement of the outer slope protection of the 
Westkapel sea dike, partly with asphalt mixtures. 


33 


yt 


p bes Tedeyysem oyy jo edojTs Jeqno ayy uo 


*d¥N eAcge W OS*L 04 00°S Wours 
uotzoaejord euoqys sTqqns ey jo uot ZeIyoUeg 


°€ einatd 


34 


UV~ peqerqeued uofyoeqord euoys eTqqnaz syy Jo 4yno us04 qualseIy y 


*oTaseu 4 [eudse 
*exTp ees Tedeyxysom 


*7 einaya 


35 


475 ke/m* of pouring asphalt, consisting of 13% 
asphaltic bitumen 50/60, 7% filler, 35% dune sand and 
45% "pearl" gravel was used. In 1947 other areas were 
repaired by roughly setting the basalt stones on a thin 
base of rubble stone and filling the spaces with pour- 
ing asphalt, consisting of 17% asphaltic bitumen 50/60, 
9% filler and 74% dune sand. 250 kg per square meter 
of pouring asphalt were used, which filled the spaces 
in the rubble stone base as well. About 12 ke/m? of 
asphalt remained on the upper ends of the stones. This 
was removed by wave action (Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8). 


The protection built in this way proved satis- 
factory; practically no damage was caused by gales. 
The designers state that this construction method must 
be considered as an experiment. Due to the urgency of 
the work and the lack of time, there was no opportunity 
to investigate the economy and efficiency of this con- 
struction in comparison with others which might have been 
preferable. In spite of this the work, which was ex- 
ecuted within a short period of time, may be considered 
as a success. 


Sheeting of the New North Harbour Dam at Harlingen 1947-48, 
(Figure 9) 


Quite a different kind of experiment with the application of 
asphaltic bitumen on a large scale is found in the protection of 
the new North harbour dam at Harlingen, where a dam consisting 
of sand was simply covered with a layer of so-called bituminous 
sand, that is a warm mixture of 5% asphaltic bitumen and 95% 
sea sand. This material was produced in the Netherlands for the 
first time by the Research Laboratory of Royal Shell at Amsterdam 
in the spring of 1947 at the road building section of the Dutch 
Concrete Association Ltd. (Hollandsche Beton Maatschappy) at 
Amsterdam. A small addition of asphaltic bitumen proved sufficient 
to bind the sand-particles strongly. The 160 m test section of 
the North harbour dam at Harlingen, which was built in the same 
year, was protected to the low water level by a layer of bituminous 
sand containing 5% asphaltic bitumen and 95% sea sand, 0.40 m 
thick to +4.00 m N.A.P. and 0.25 m thick above that level. 


The under water slope protection on the sea side, which was 
constructed as a bituminous mattress, crumbled after it had 
been undermined as it did not have the required flexibility. 
Therefore during 1948 the existing work was re-covered over about 
100 m length with a layer of a richer mixture containing 16% 
asphaltic bitumen (40/50) and 84% sea sand. 


In 1948 the 900 m harbour dam was completed (figures 10, 11 
and 12). The 1947 method was used once more with the exception 
that: 


36 


*4 ,eudse Zut.mod eyq Jo uofqgeozidde syq esozeq 4 [eseq utom Jo dead -cextp ees Tedexqsem °S SBT 


°u0o 
Ta e0TTdde reqzse aTeseq UsOm jo dead 


"stp ees Tedeyqsey 


*extp ees [Tedeyqysem 


Q eunata 


38 


‘paaowed ueeq SBY SPTOA ayy OUT SxeLqoued 4oU PTpP YoTUM req ZOU a Teud 
uopzeotidde ey, seqye syquow moj ‘yes ATYSNOI ‘seuo4s 4[BSeq UTS 


*uot,zoe eaem AQ 
se seul °yreudse jo 
*exTp Bes Tedeyxqsom 


39 


-qTeudse Sutanod uytm peqynois suoqys 4[eseq jo uotyoeqo1d edoTg *extp ves [Tedeyqsom °g ound Ty 


40 


BITUMINEUS ZAND 


8% ASF. BIT.40/50 
10% stone filler 
80/> % sand 
1%, WETFIX 


10% ASF. B1T.40/50 


5% ASF. BIT.40/50 
90% sand 


BeSCINe 95% sand 


WADDENZEE New Outport 


; ... Bottom of new Fill. 


As it on 
mattress A-A 
20% ASF. BIT. ALS / 
60% §$ BOVEN 
gnsend ( see NEW NORTH HARBOR NEW NORTH HARBOR DAM 
above 
WADDENZEE \C Asphalt mattress Asphalt mattress 
vs 
ge Be EE 


a> Fascing mattress : 
with stone 


HARBOR ENTRANCE HARLINGEN 


\\ \\WILLEMS 
CONSTRUCTED : DOCK Bee 


1947 = 1948 Se 


Figure 9. Sheeting of the new north harbor dam at Harlingen with 
bituminous sand and asphalt mattress. 


41 


Jeqjno ey uo puss 


snouzuniyiq Sutpeeids pue Zutdung 


*edots 


*uesUTLIeY 92 Wep JoqIey YYtON 


MeN 


°OT sand ty 


42 


*sTleys pues ueum4tq ofq Teydse yoy 
Ui peteaod pue peqyoeduoo ‘peeuds Suteq wep uesuT[zey jo edo[s seqno eyy jo zaAoo sul 


*TT emats 


43 


°LY61 UT peqonazqysuoo uofZqoes 6uy Saver Sy 


Ul ‘pues snouTuM4tq yytm peqyoeqyord st yoTym ‘wep meu ey JO 4OOs eUy 4B 
ey, Jo uoTqoes @ ST pumalzgerloy euy UL “UusedUT [IBY ye Wep Joqaey eyy jo ded 


wep [ety TuyT 
SuUTSOLO yy 


°ZL eaunaty 


44 


Le the under water slope protection at the side of the 
vwadden sea was made of fascine mattresses, covered with 
stone. 


2. the terrace at +0.10 m N.A.P. and the lower part of 
the outer slope were covered with a rich mixture, con- 
taining 8% asphaltic bitumen (40/50), 10% filler, 80.5% 
sea sand and 1.5% Wetfix. 


36 the under water slope protection on the harbour side 
below the terrace at +0.45 m N.A.P. was laid on a dry 
base and consisted of bituminous sand containing 10% 
asphaltic bitumen and 90% sea sand 


4. the remaining surfaces were covered with bituminous 
sand containing 5% asphaltic bitumen and 95% sea sand, 
sheeted with an impermeable layer of pure asphaltic 
bitumen or tar, and covered with shells. 


Modification 1 was necessary because it had been proven that 
the bituminous sand could not follow the local changes of the sea 
bottom due to wave action andstrong currents. On a short section 
of the under water slope prefabricated asphalt mattresses were 
placed, containing about 20% asphaltic bitumen and 80% sea sand. 
These will be discussed later in the section on mattresses. 


Modification 2 proved necessary because in the original 
mixture (5% asphaltic bitumen and 95% sea sand) the adhesion 
diminished as a result of the replacement of the asphalt film 
around the particles by water, It was impossible to provide this 
area, which remained wet constantly, with an imvermeable sheeting. 


For the same reason the under water slope on the harbour side 
where no substantial changes of the bottom were to be expected, d 
was provided with a rich cover of bituminous sand. : 


The impermeable sheeting mentioned under 4 seemed desirable 
to check the weathering of the porous layer which would be ex- 
posed to waves running up the slope and to rain water, and 
furthermore to form an acceptable construction i rom an aesthetic 
point of view. 


Post war conditions, which hampered the import of basalt 
from Germany and the lack of foreign currency, were the main 
reasons for this large scale experiment. The construction with- 
stood the high tide of 1 March 1949 in an excellent manner and other- 
wise lived up to expectations. The poor mixture however remiins 
rather soft; and it remains to be sean whether the material will 
last. 

This experiment is very important to determine the solidity 
of poor asphalt mixtures of various compositions as a temporary 


45 


or permanent slope protection along the sea shore. 
Mattresses 


Along the lower part of the Mississippi where the strong 
current undermines the banks along the bends, mattresses of as-— 
phalt mortar have been used extensively as a bank protection since 
1932. 


In April 1934 a great floating asphalt plant was put into . 
use for this purpose, With this plant mattresses could be made 
65 m in width and 190 m in length, reaching down to 50 m below 
low water and covering slopes of 123 to 1:5. The maximum current 
velocity was 2.4 m/sec. 


In one season 7500 m@ of asphalt mattresses, 5 cm thick were 
placed. The composition of the asphalt mortar was 12% asphaltic 
bitumen 30/40, 22% filler (loess) and 66% river sand. The 
mattresses were reinforced with steel wire netting (5 x 10 cm) 
and provided with steel wire ropes, spaced at 0.9 m, for lower- 
ing them into place. 


In 1935 and 1936, reinforced asphalt slabls of 7 x 16.5 m 
were used on the beach groins near Galveston and Florida City. 
These slabs were placed under water with the aid of floating 
crane Se 


This method was also used on mattresses of asphalt mortar, 
size 13 x 5 m and 0.15 m thick, weighing 20 tons, which were used 
on the outer slope of the North harbour dam at Harlingen (Figures 
13, 14, and 15). These asphalt slabs contained 20% asphaltic 
bitumen and 80% sea sand, and were reinforced with four steel 
wires of 1" diameter. Some slabs cracked while they were being 
lifted, probably due to insufficient stretching of the wires 
before and during the fabrication (Figure 16). 


Other mattresses of asphalt mortar, 15 x 5 mand 0.05 m 
thick were placed nearby. These were fabricated at Harlingen 
and wrapped around a drum 2 m in diameter after which they were 
transported and put into place (Figure 17). Both types of 
mattresses, which emerge during low water, have fitted themselves 
perfectly to the uneven base and show few if any defects. 


Three slabs wrapped around drums were placed on the dumped 
stone in front of the north east polder dike. The upper 
part of these slabs has been destroyed completely; they contained 
only 15% asphaltic bitumen and proved to be very porous, probably 
as a result of insufficient stirring of the mixture during trans- 
portation from the point to the construction site. 


In preparation for the proposed drainage! of the Yssel lake 
several asphalt mortar slabs 2 x 2 m, 0.06 m thick, and of varying 
composition and reinforcement, were fabricated in 1948. The best 
result was obtained with a mixture of 15% asphaltic bitumen, 15% 


46 


*ssouyotuy 


°Zuni3s pue peoetd elem 


seTqeo BUTIFTT ©Uy YO UM uo (HoTUA W SLO*) JekeT 4SATF Fo doq uo pajetduioo Suteq (wST° 
Su ¢ X €T) sseqqqew qTeydse ue go Buypqseo ey] cuesUT[Iey Ye Joqzey YyZIOU MeN 


"EL eunaty 


*osueIO SUTQEOTS © UTM ET einsty ut umous ssei44 eu 


qleudse u04 


oz ey 


SuTI SET 


*7T eangaty 


48 


*sserqgem qTeydse u0q Oz oyq BuTOETd 


°ST eanatga 


49 


PeqystT 


*euero Aq 
Suteq e[ Tym Sutyxeetq ssei4qeu 4Teudse u0oq—-Aquem], 


°OT aln3aty 


® punoite peddeim suteq 


Ssuoq 6 SuTUusTOM 


‘yotuy W 90° 


Sug xX ST 


6 


*(uesuTTIeH) °wnip 
ssei4qew 4 Teydse uy 


°LT eangty 


dl 


filler and 70% Yssel lake sand, and reinforcement of cocos 
matting with 0.015 m gauge sprayed with a binder before use. 


The methods described above for construction, at the site 
or elsewhere, transportation and placing of asphalt mattresses 
can only be used in quiet water, whereas the slabs must be of 
restricted size when floating cranes or drums are being used. 
For some time therefore attempts have been made to find a method 
to transport and sink asphalt-mttresses, similar to the one 
which can be used with fascine mttresses. Also, if an asphalt 
mattress of any size could be kept afloat with inexpensive 
means and could be towed through a medium swell, the skilled 
fascine mattress workers could be used to assist in the difficult 
naudling and placing of the mattresses, which would be of great 
valuee in the system of W. J. van der Gord this can be achieved 
by providing the asphalt mattress with a temporary flexible rim 
of some impermeable mterial, thus forming a vessel of sufficient 
buoyancy . 


4 mattress of asphalt mortar was constructed for the piers 
at Heok of Holland according to this system. The mixture con- 
tained 20% asphaltic bitumen 60/70, 10% filler and 70% dune sand. 
The slab, 7.5 x 3 x 0.07 m, was reinforced with cocos mtting 
of O.C15 m gauge and three towing cables of wire rope. The 
slab was constructed on a horizontal wooden floor which was built 
at a small beach along the New Waterway near Hook of Holland, 
at 0.80 m below the high water level (Figure 18). The slab 
floated as soon as the water reached 0.20 m above the floor and 
was towed out on the river. The asphalt slab and rim followed 
the wave movement easily (Figure 19). Presently the slab was 
towed back and anchored above the floor after which water was 
admitted through the tube in the centre and the slab was sunk 
for the time being to await transport to its final destination. 


Although dependent on the most suitable construction method, 
it is to be expected that the cost of such a mattress will be 
considerably less than the cost of a fascine mttress with dumped 
stone o 


The advantage of an asphalt mattress over a fascine mattress 
is that in sea water the former will not be attacked by the ship 
worm (teredo navalis). Experience will show whether the asphalt 
mattress will stand up under current and wave action and whether 
it is suitable for the protection of steep and uneven submrine 
slopes © 


Reinforcement of Beach Groins and Harbour Dams 

One of the great difficulties met in the construction of 
beach groins and harbour dams, is ths removal of damped stone 
and set stone by wave action. This is true particularly near 
deep water, where the effect of a avy ground swell may be 


52 


‘Teast Jeqem UST UeeWl MOTE W Og® = d¥N + UOT’ 42 peyenqgys sft 1ooTy sutyseo oul 
*Sutaseo szeqge ATeqetpoumt w 40° x € xX S°L sserqqel qteqdsy °puelTOW JO HooH 4B Stetd “ST eins ty 


s caien — "18 jem 
Jo uotssTupe ey, Joy eqnq e& sft Jequed 9Yy4 UT *sqzoddns uepoom esoot Aq dn prey seaueo 


peqeussoiduy jo espe st sseiqqe s7Tyy jo WTs Azeiodwey eu, °Aem1eqem MoU SY4 SSso1OB 
pouoy Buteq (uz* qsesp ‘w LO* x € X S*L) ssetqquu qT EIdse UY “pULTTOH Fo Yooy ye Stet, 61 Sunsta 


54 


considerable, and rocks up to 3 tons and more have been moved. 


In the United States an attempt was made to consolidate the 
stones, for the first time in 1936 by filling the voids with 
asphalt mortar. This method was used in the Netherlands for the 
first time in 1938 by the Engineer in Chief of Delfland, A.C. 
Kolff, on some beach groins near Scheveningen, Since 1945 it has 
been increasingly used. 


a. Groin at the mouth of Columbia river 1936. - The groin 
is situated at the Pacific Ocean in an area of heavy wave-action 
and reaches from 18 m below to 7.5 m above low water. It has a 
top width of 12 m and is constructed of stones from 1 to 12 tons. 
The asphalt grouting contained 15-18% asphalt mortar and was 
applied only to the upper part. 


b. Galveston Jetty 1936. - The asphalt—groubing of this 
structurs proved satisfactory. 


e. Delfland Groins. - The voids of the groins were filled 
with an asphalt mortar containing 20% asphaltic bitumen [50/60 
(6%), 60/80 (7%) and 80/100 (7%), LO% filler and 70% dune sand, 
Three groins were treated from 1938 to 1940 and seventeen more from 
1946 to 1948. On each zroin 30 tons of the mortar were used, 
or an average of 0.5 tons per m-. This reinforcing method of 
the beach groin proved entirely satisfactory. When a floating 
mine exploded against one of these groins it was found that the 
voids were filled to a depth of 1 m below the surface. 


d. South Jetty of the outer saipping channel at Ymuiden, 
1926. - This jetty which was often badly dameged during heavy 
gales, was provided with asphalt mortar as described under c. 
Between the dumped stones 0.8 tons of asphalt mortar per me 
and between the set stones 0.5 tons per m* were used. Since 
then no more damage has occurred. 


@. WNorth- and South piers at Hook of Holland 1946-50, 
(Figure 20). - The piers are 2 lm in length, with the top, 
4m wide at mean sea level. The heavy stone protection (stones 
of O.l to 3 tons) of the outer section could not resist the 
heavy ground swell so that it was often damaged, and the normal 
gauge railroad which was laid on oak girders on top of the 
jetty required abnormally high expenditures for maintenance. 
In view of this, it has been decided to convert the railroad 
into a single lane road for trucks and to grout the set stone 
and dumped stone with asphalt-mortar where the attack is 
heaviest. 


The outer 1 km section of the North pier and the so-called 
connecting jetty, forming the connection between the South 
jetty and the low jetty which was constructed at a later date, 
were thus reconstructed (Figure 21-26) from 1946 to the middle 


39 


Trialsection bituminous sand eX, 


MN O2OLe2 wo 2rE Je 4 
aa eT AS I 5% ASFALT BITUMEN 60/70 i 
(Sag F BP ° x 

Fo nl 95% dune sand e 
wD A ee 

1 Poe 
o> North pier 

a pas = 

ar La 

: A O/ 
Ecaccting < wr Sy ew, 
»)/ 
< A 2; 
‘ (ei low dam 
we | ou 
Guiding SA a 
. dam NC 
South pier 
Y \ 
LEGEND: \ 
Sections which have been ef will 
HHH be treated with pouring asphalt. 
PIERS AT HOOK OF HOLLAND ra 


construction of 


20% ASFALT BIT. 9% 
asphalt mattress. 


10% FILLER 
70 % SAND 


Pouring asphalt 


Set and dumped stone 


G H.W. = 066* 


Concrete slabs 


an @ 
7 


OR ; 
i asiages 2 ays 
XC NEREVIE SIS SSA DOEES 


AEN ata 


Sy LAAAZKR RAZA ANAK ROARS s re oe SAIN NDONUS 


Mattress 


Figure 20. Reinforcement of the offshore sections of the piers at 
Hook of Holland. 


56 


“L76T JO uunqne ut pet{dde 3utqnou3 uytm 
uoyqoaz01d euogs payoegqe ATTAReY JO YIed *PUETIOH Jo Hooy 4e etd yqiou oyy Jo pug *Te eunsty 


Figure 22. North pier, Hook of Holland. The conversion of the railroad 
track,into track for trucks, consisting of concrete blocks and set stone 
with asphalt grouting carried out in 1948. The gutler to carry the light- 
house cable is in the center. In the foreground is the wide section near 
the foot of the lighthouse. 


58 


*dupynoid y[eydse uqtm pepytaoid eioum pes euepun st yousy euy punoisyoeq |8yy 
pe, eTduoo sem yoTuM yoeI4 BUY 


ul °pettdde useeq you pey Sutqnois y[eydse eyq steym 4nq 
JO uoTZOeS B 04 B76T Aequeydes ut eTes @ Aq poesneo ed eweg 


6 


*pueTIOH Jo yooy 


Szatd yqion 


°€e einsty 


D9 


WOCIZ S44 FO SEPTS SYR Soy gnq 
Tfidy uz etes Aq pesneo eseurg 


€ 


*peqynois ueeq 40k qou peu 
pezeTdwoo q4soWw[e sem YOTYM UOTIOSS 4uoYUS B UO 676T 
*pueltIOH JO Yooy 4e Jetd yynos aesu wep Zutqoeuu0g 


W 


@ 


eingty 


*epta FTey 4e L76T YNsny ut uexey sinqgoTgd septa ysty Aq pefarqsep 
ATTeTq1ed pue pesewep sem YOTYM PUSTTOH Jo YooyH 4e wep duyyoeuuo0o |yy4 Jo uoTyxoOes UAuOU su 


°Se eunaty 


61 


*T[ems punoisd Aaewey ay 

fq. wep eq Jeno pepTIzes erm yoTum edoTs sutieuqns ey} Woy saepTNog 3TqQ 4UdTI SU 4V 
°676T Yodel T Jo ates Aavsy ayQ 1eqye ATeqetpewwy Jeqem MOT Suftimp useyeq einyotgd ~*paet idde 
Suyqnous 4 eydse pue 67-B76T JO TequyM UT UOFZONAGSUOdDe I8zZe SZ eins tq se MOeTA aues 


9 


@ ean3ta 


62 


of 1949. Itis osostese to finish this work in Tne The asphalt 
mortar contained 20% asphaltic bitumen 60/70, 10% fille er and 70% 
dune sand. “Sefore the pouring of the mortar, the nor : of 
the stonss were wetted te prevent the 4 spha lb from st 
surfaces irom which it would be removed by wave action after some 
time in any event.° 


The POU Ee quantities cf pouring asohalt were used 
SUC ea Sean stween the peat s3s% stones and in the road on 
the North pisr 250 ken; & stween the heavy set stones (100-500 
) $00 Ke/m ; in the dumps ¢ stone (500-3000 kg} around the head 
f the pier 1000-1500 ke jm. ‘Th 1 preatest care was taken to 
Pall the voids completely in order to avoid cavities in which 


Cc S$ 
air and water pressure Spee develop. The new construction with- 
stood the gale of 1 March 1949 ex slave y 


S sand against 
tress which was 

ie was re- 
tic bitumen 
325 m? of the mixture was 


In order to test the spare of bin 
wave action, part of the dumped s of 
Situated in the breaker zone north 
placed by bituminous sand consistin 
60/70 and 95% dune sand. In tota 
dumped on the mattress. 


ca cee 
Ky q 


uring more than 
dist nteerated by 
of a 


ay 


It was learned from peri 
year, that the bituminous sean 


We ee action. Furthermore a Bee nae the fmerican 
stone borer (Fetricola pholadiformis) was found in a sample. 


In cooperation with the Rijkswesenbouwlaboratorium a con- 
tainer with samples of bituminous sand of various compositi 
has been placed in the breaker zone so that it may be det 
which asphalt content is required to make the material pre 
against the stone borer. 


f. Miscellaneous asphalt works on beach eroins and harbour 
jettiss. - In 1948 the Somes stone deposits around the outer 
sections of the Scheveningen harbour jetties were filled with 
pouring asphalt. In the same year a beach groin built as a 
sand mound covered with bituminous sand, was constructed in the 
1944 gap in the Westkapel sea dike (Fig In 1949 the 

b 


reinforcement of dumped stone deposits of ¢ 
of Delfland, and the province of North Holl 
Kamperduin and along the North sea shore of 
carried out. 


mH Es ¢ 


Conclusion 


In hydraulic works as in road construction, synt ae 
asphalt has rapidly become a useful building materis 
to the extensive research work of various laborato 


i 
Gales st is 
now possible to produce asphalt mixtures with propert 


63 


suit the type of work. 


In many instances, the use of asphalt mixtures in hydraulic 
works has not led to favorable results, which seems only natural 
in view of the fact that this material originally was unsuitable 
for this purpose. However these failures should not make us look 
for other methods instantly. The age old science of hydraulic 
engineering has produced many an ingenious method to fight the 
water which undoubtedly may be used once more in the application 
of asphalt in hydraulic works. Only if this proves to be impossible 
will new working methods have to be found to solve the problem. 


Certainly the motto of J.i'.W. Conrad, which he used in 1864 
for his prize-winning contribution to a contest regarding the 
improvement of the Hondsbossche sea dike, still holds a truth: 
"Don't condemn the old because it's old, nor the new because 
it's new." 


64 


BEACH EROSION STUDIES 


The principal types of beach erosion reports of studies at 
specific localities are the following: 


a. Cooperative studies (authorization by the Chief of 
Engineers in accordance with Section 2, River and 
Harbor Act approved on 3 July 1930). 


b. Preliminary examinations and surveys (Congressional 
authorization by reference to locality by name). 


Ce Reports on shore line shanges which may result from 
improvements of the entrances at the mouths of rivers 
and inlets (Section 5, Public Law No. 409, 74th Congress). 


d. Reports on shore protection of Federal property (author- 
ization by the Chief of gngineers). 


Of these types of studies, cooperative beach erosion studies are 
the type most frequently made when a comminity desires investigation 
of its particular problem. As tnese studies have greater general 
interest, information concerning studies of specific localities con- 
tained in these quarterly bulletins will be confined to cooperative 
studies. Information about other types of studies can be obtained 
upon inquiry to this office. 


Cooperative studies of beach erosion are studies mad 
Corps of Engineers in cooperation with appropriats age 
various States by authority of Ssction 2, of the River 
Act approved 3 July 1930. By executive ruling the cos 
studies is divided equally between the United States and 
operating agency. Information concerning the initiation of a co- 
operative study may be obtained from any District Engineer of ths 
Corps of Engineers. ‘fter a report on a cooperative study has been 
transmitted to Consress, a summary thereof is included in the next 
issue of this bulletin. A list of cooperative studies now in pro- 
sress follows: 


COOPERATIVE BEACH EHROSION STUDIES IN PROGRESS 
Nev! HAMPSHIRE 


HAMPTON BEACH. Cooperative Agency: New Hampshire Shore and Beach 
Preservation and Development Commission. 


Problem: To determine the best method of preventing further 
erosion and of stabilizing and restoring the beaches, 
also to determine the extent of deral aid in any 
proposed plans of protection and improvement. 


65 


MASSACHUSETTS 


PEMBERTON POINT TO GURNET POINT. Cooperating Agency: Department of 
Public Works, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 


Problem: To determine the best methods of shore protection, 
prevention of further erosion and improvement of beaches, 
and specifically to develop plans for protection of 
Crescent Beach, The Glades, North Scituate Beach and 
Brant Rock. 


CONNECTICUT 


STATE OF CONNECTICUT. Cooperating Agency: State of Connecticut 
(Acting through the Flood Control and Water Policy 
Commission). 


Problem; To determine the most suitable methods of stabilizing 
and improving the shore line. Sections of the coast 
will be studied in order of priority as requested by 

‘ the cooperating agency until the entire coast.is in- 
cluded, 


NEW YORK 
JONES BEACH. Cooperating Agency; Long Island State Parks Commission 

Problem: To determine behavior of the shore during a 12-month 
cycle, including study of littoral drift, wave re- 
fraction and movement of artificial sand supply between 
Fire Island and Jones Inlets. 

NEW JERSEY 
OCEAN CITY. Cooperating Agency: City of Ocean City. 

Problem: To determine the causes of erosion or accretion and 
the effect of previously constructed groins and 
structures, and to recommend remedial measures to pre- 
vent further erosion and to restore the beaches. 

VIRGINIA 
VIRGINIA BEACH. Cooperating Agency: Town of Virginia Beach. 
Problem: To determine the methods for the improvement and 


protection of the beach and existing concrete sea 
wall. " 


66 


SOUTH CAROLINA 


STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Cooperating Agency: State Highway Depart- 
ment. 


Problem: To determine the best method of preventing erosion, 
stabilizing and improving the beaches. 


FLORT DA 
PINELLAS COUNTY. Cooperating Agency: Board of County Commissioners. 


Problem: To determine the best methods of preventing further 
recession of the gulf shore line, stabilizing the 
gulf shores of certain passes, and widening certain 
beaches within the study area. 


LOUISIANA 


LAKE PONCHARTRAIN. Cooperating Agency: Board of Levee Commissioners, 
Orleans Levee District. 


Problem: To determine the best method of effecting necessary 
repairs to the existing sea wall and the desirability 
of building an artificial beach to provide protection 
to the wall and also to provide additional recreational 


beach area. 
TEXAS 


GALVESION COUNTY. Cooperating Agency: County Commissioners Court 
of Galveston County. 


Problem: To determine the best method of providing a permanent 
beach and the necessity for further protection or ex- 
tending the sea wall within the area bounded by the 
Galveston South Jetty and Hight Mile Road. 


To determine the most practicable and economical 
method of preventing or retarding bank recession on 
the shore of Galveston Bay between April Fool Point 
and Kemah. 


CALIFORNIA 


STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Cooperating ‘genty. Division of Beaches and 
Parks, State of California, 


Problem: To conduct a study of the problems of beach erosion 
and shore protection along the entire coast of Calif- 
ernias The initial studies are to be madg in the 
Ventura-Port Huneme area, the Santa Monica area and 
the Santa Cruz area. 


67 


WISCONSIN 
RACINE COUNTY. Cooperating Agency: Racine County. 


Froblem: To prevent erosion by waves and currents, and to 
determine the most suitable methods for protection, 
restoration and development of beaches, 


KENOSHA. Cooperating Agency, City of Kenosha. 


Problem: To determine the best method of shore protection and 
beach erosion control. 


OHIO 


STATE OF OHIO. Cooperating Agency: State of Ohio (Acting through 
the Superintendent of Public Works). 


Problem: To determine the best method of preventing further 
erosion of and stabilizing existing beaches, of re- 
storing and creating new beaches, and appropriate 
locations for the development of recreational  . 
facilities by the State along the Lake Erie shore 
line. 


TERRITORY OF HAWAII 


WAIKIKI BEACH: 
WAIMBA & HANAPEPHE, KAUAI. Cooperating Agency: Board of Harbor 
Commissioners, Territory of Hawaii. 


Problem: To determine the most suitable method of preventing 
erosion, and of increasing the usable recreational 
beach area, and to determine the extent of Federal 
aid in effecting the desired improvement. 


a At x“ 
rN nw “ 


% % 


BEACH EROSION LITERATURE 


There are listed below some recent acquisitions to the Board's 
library which are considered to be of general interest. Copies of 
these publications can be obtained on 30-day loan by interested 
official agencies. 


"Refraction of Shallow Water Waves: The combined effect of currents 
and underwater topography," Trans. American Geophysical Union, 
Vol. 31, No. 4 


This paper gives a solution for determining the re- 
fraction effect according to Fermat's Principle for shallow 
water waves moving in any given distribution of currents and 
depth. Application is made to an analytic model of an intense 
rip current and theresults are compared to actual rips. 


"A Method of Measuring Electrically the Velocity of Fluids, B. 
Thurlema nn 


This paper discusses the theory on which an ocean current 
velocity meter is developed and also discusses the construction 
of a model instrument based on this theory. 


"The Limitations of the Principle of Superposition," Paul R. Heyi, 
Jour. Washineton Academy of Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 11, 1950. 


This paper gives a brief discussion of the principle 
of superposition as applied to harmonic analysis of wave 
forms. Several allowable and several erroneous applications 
of the principle are discussed which are of interest to 
engineers studying wave forms such as wind waves and tides. 


"Model and Prototype Stuides for the Design of Sand Traps," R. L. 
Parshall, July 1950 


The hydraulic laboratories at Fort Collins have made various 
investigations to develop a means for ridding channels of bed 
load deposits. Out of these investigations come two practical 
means, namely the vortex tube and the ripple deflector-vortex 
tube sand traps which are discussed in this paper. 


"Turbidity Currents as a Cause of Graded Bedding, Jour. of Geology, 
Vol. 58, No. 2, Narch 195C. 


This paper discusses the causes and magnitude of 
particle grading by the action of turbidity currents. 
Naturally cbserved grading and artificially produced grading 
are described. 


69 


"Talud limite entre la rotura y la reflexion de las olas: The 
Critical Slope Between Incipient Breaking and Reflecting of 
Waves! Ramon Iribarren Cavanilles, Casto Nogales y Olano, Feb. 
1950. 


Translation by Waterways Experiment Station and publish- 
ed as Translation No. 50-2, 1950. 


70