Skip to main content

Full text of "Bull Mountains coal field study : progress report, 1976 : research conducted by Montana Department of Fish and Game, Environment and Information Division and Consolidation Coal Company"

See other formats


L 


BULL  MOUNTAINS  COAL  FIELD  STUDY 
Progress  Report  1976 
Research  Conducted  by: 


MONTANA  DEPARTMENT  OF  FISH  AND  GAME 
Environment  and  Information  Division 

and 

CONSOLIDATION  COAL  COMPANY 


c 


-  -  " 


STATE  DOCUMENTS  COLL: 


"  '  -2003 

MCNTAN'A  STATE  LIBRAF 
1515  E.  6th  AVE. 

Prepared  by:  Gary  L.  Dusek,  Biologist,  Roundup,  Montana 

June  30,  1976 


MONTANA  STATE  LIBRARY 


3  0864  1002  4394  1 


^y 


u ,' 


't^F 


Ifar 


c 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  SEP  20   19/g 

_  KSOURCES  &  CONSERVATION 

List  of  Tables T.  tii 

List  of  Figures v 

Introduction 1 

Study  Area 1 

Location 1 

Climate 3 

Vegetation 3 

Phases  of  Study 3 

General  Wildlife  Ecology  Study 3 

Mule  Deer 5 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 5 

Distribution  and  Movements 5 

Group  Characteristics 6 

Use  of  Vegetati  on  Types 10 

Relation  to  Timber. 12 

Use  of  Slopes 13 

Use  of  Exposures 14 

Fall  Food  Habits 15 

Population  Characteristics 15 

Elk 18 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 18 

Distribution  and  Movements 18 

Group  Characteristics 27 

Use  of  Vegetation  Types 28 

Relation  to  Timber 28 

Use  of  SI  opes 30 

Use  of  Exposures 31 

Fall  Food  Habits 32 

Population  Characteristics 32 

Turkeys 36 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 36 

Flocking  Characteristics 36 

Use  of  Vegetation  Types 36 

Relation  to  Timber 39 

Use  of  Slopes 39 

Fal  1  Foods 39 

Population  Characteristics 41 

Other  Game  Species 42 

Antel  ope 42 

White-tailed  Deer 42 

Sharp-tailed  Grouse 42 

Revegetation  Studies 42 

Consol's  Test  Pit 43 

Vegetational  Analysis 43 

Soil  Mixture 43 

Gradient 46 

Exposure 46 

Use  by  Wildlife 46 


Square  Deal  Mine 49 

Vegetational  Analysis 49 

Summary  and  Discussion. 51 

Literature  Cited 53 


w 


sSfc 


, . ,     .......    .     ■   ■ 


3HR  ■■    ■■  m 


\t^ 


11 


LIST  OF  TABLES 
Table  Pa9e 

1.  Climatological  data  for  Roundup,  Montana,  covering  the 

period  of  January  1972  through  February  1976 4 

2.  Capture  and  movement  data  for  14  individually  marked  mule 
deer  that  were  observed  during  the  report  period  ending 
February  29,  1976 7 

3.  Frequency  among  group  sizes  and  average  group  size  of  mule 

deer  by  season  during  the  report  period 10 

4.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetational  types  by  mule  deer  as  deter- 
mined by  1677  observations  during  the  report  period 11 

5.  Occurrence  of  mule  deer  at  various  distances  from  the 
nearest  stand  of  timber,  determined  from  1677  ground  and 

aerial  observations 13 

6.  Seasonal  use  of  various  topographical  features  by  mule  deer 
as  determined  from  1677  ground  and  aerial  observations  dur- 
ing the  report  period 13 

7.  Seasonal  use  of  gradients  by  mule  deer  during  the  report 

period 14 

8.  Seasonal  use  of  eight  exposures  by  mule  deer  as  deter- 
mined from  734  observations  during  the  report  period 15 

9.  Fall  food  habits  of  mule  deer  as  determined  from  examina- 
tion of  rumen  contents  of  three  hunter-killed  mule  deer...     16 

10.  Population  characteristics  of  mule  deer  as  determined 
from  1675  ground  and  aerial  observations  from  March  1975 
through  February  1976 17 

11.  Capture  and  movement  data  for  seven  adult  cow  elk  captured 
and  individually  marked  during  the  winters  of  1974  and 

1975 19 

12.  Seasonal  radius  of  activity,  distances  between  consecu- 
tive observations,  mean  maximum  distances  between  observa- 
tions, and  distances  between  centers  of  activity  of  seven 
individually  marked  adult  cow  elk  in  the  Bull  Mountains...     26 

13.  Frequency  among  group  sizes  and  average  group  sizes  of  elk 

by  season  during  the  report  period 27 

14.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetation  types  by  elk  as  determined  from 

1426  observations  during  the  report  period 29 

15.  Occurrence  of  elk  at  various  distances  from  the  nearest 
stand  of  timber  as  determined  from  1426  observations 

during  the  report  period 30 

16.  Seasonal  use  of  various  topographical  features  by  elk  as 
determined  from  1426  observations  during  the  report 

period 31 

17.  Seasonal  use  of  gradients  by  elk  during  the  report 

period 31 

18.  Seasonal  use  of  each  of  eight  exposures  by  elk  as  deter- 
mined from  568  observations  during  the  report  period 32 

19.  Fall  food  habits  of  elk  as  determined  from  examination  of 

rumen  contents  of  four  el  k 33 

20.  Population  characteristics  of  elk  as  determined  from  938 
observations  during  summer  and  fall  1975  and  winter  1975- 

76 34 

21.  Seasonal  flocking  characteristics  of  turkeys  based  on  712 
observations  during  the  report  period 37 


m 


Table 


Page 


22.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetation  types  by  turkeys  as  deter- 
mined from  712  observations  during  the  report  period 38 

23.  Occurrence  of  turkeys  at  various  distances  from  the 
nearest  stand  of  timber  as  determined  from  712  observa- 
tions during  the  report  period 40 

24.  Seasonal  use  of  the  various  topographical  features  by 
turkeys  as  determined  from  712  observations  during  the 

report  peri  od 40 

25.  Seasonal  use  of  gradients  by  turkeys  during  the  report 

period 40 

26.  Fall  foods  of  turkeys  as  determined  from  analysis  of  crops 

from  two  hunter-killed  turkeys 41 

27.  Population  characteristics  of  turkeys  during  the  period 
August-October  based  on  251  observations 41 

28.  Constancy,  canopy  coverage  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  various  types  of  soil  on  spoils  material  as 
determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter  plots  on  each 

of  19  sites  at  Consol's  test  pit 44 

29.  Constancy,  canopy  coverage,  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  various  classes  of  gradient  on  spoils 
material  as  determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter 

plots  on  each  of  19  sites  at  Consol's  test  pit 47 

30.  Constancy,  canopy  coverage,  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  northerly  and  southerly  exposures  on  spoils 
material  as  determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter 

plots  on  each  of  14  sites  at  Consol's  test  pit 48 

31.  Constancy,  canopy  coverage  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  a  gently  sloping  southeast  exposure  as 
determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter  plots  on  each 

of  three  sites  at  the  Square  Deal  Mine 50 


J 


IV 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 


Figure 

1, 

2, 


1  Mountains  study  area 

Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  an  adult  male  mule 
deer  captured  during  February  1975  and  an  adult  female 
captured  during  January  1973  in  the  Fattig  Creek  drainage. 
Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  two  adult  female 
mule  deer  captured  during  December  1974  and  January  1975 

in  the  Halfbreed  Creek  drainage 

Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  1  from 

February  1974  through  February  1976 

Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  2  from 

February  1974  through  February  1976 

Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  3  during 
the  period  of  January  8,  1975  through  February  29,  1976... 
Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  4  during 
the  period  of  January  8,  1975  through  February  29,  1976... 
Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  6  during 
the  period  of  January  10,  1975  through  February  29,  1976.. 
Map  of  Consol's  test  pit  showing  respective  areas,  soil  mix- 
tures and  location  of  19  permanent  vegetational  analysis 
sites 


Page 

2 

S 

9 

20 
21 
22 
23 
24 

45 


INTRODUCTION 

This  study  was   the  first  of  several   coal /energy-related  planning 
inventories  to  assess  the  potential    impact  of  such  development  on  wildlife 
in  Montana.     These  studies  resulted  from  a  concern  by  resource  managers 
during  the  early  1970's  about  the  impact  of  large-scale  surface  mining 
for  coal   and  associated  on-site  conversion  plants  on  eastern  Montana's 
wildlife  resource.     Before  the  inception  of  this  study,  large-scale  mining 
and  exporting  of  coal   from  the  Bull   Mountains  appeared  imminent.     The 
threat  of  such  an  operation  has  diminished  somewhat,  due,  at  least  in  part, 
to  a  stricter  federal    leasing  policy  and  a  strict  state  mining  and  reclama- 
tion law.     The  two  active  surface  mines  in  the  Bull  Mountains  affect  small 
acreages  and  supply  a  local  market.     A  possibility  does  exist  that  the  two 
companies  may  merge  in  the  future  and  apply  for  a  permit  to  expand  the 
operation  and  mine  coal   for  export. 

This  study  was   initiated  with  the  following  overall  objectives: 

(1)  to  determine  the  impact,  or  potential   impact,  of  surface 
mining  upon  the  wildlife  resource  in  this  area; 

(2)  to  ensure  that  wildlife  habitat  values  receive  full   recogni- 
tion  in  any  mining  or  reclamation  effort;  and, 

(3)  to  investigate  possible  modifications  or  innovations  in  the 
reclamation  process  to  avoid  unnecessary  loss  of  wildlife 
habitat. 

This   is   the  fourth  interim  report  since  inception  of  the  project 
during  January  1972.      It  covers  the  period  beginning  March  1,   1975  and 
ending  February  29,   1976.     As  during  previous  years,  major  emphasis  was 
placed  on  baseline  data  such  as  distribution  and  movements,  range  use,  food 
habits,   and  population  trends  of  the  principal   game  species.     Vegetational 
development  was  monitored  on  small   acreages  that  had  undergone  mining  and 
a  reclamation  attempt. 

This  study  is  scheduled  for  completion  by  June  30,   1976,   and  a  final 
report  will    follow. 


STUDY  AREA 


Location 


The  study  area  includes  that  part  of  Musselshell   County  which  lies 
south  of  the  Musselshell   River  as  well   as  a  portion  of  northern  Yellowstone 
County  (Figure  1).     The  area  appears  to  be  representative  of  the  Bull 
Mountains  ecosystem,   and  includes   the  entire  Mammoth-Rehder  coal   seam. 
Livestock  production  is  the  principal   industry,  while  some  of  the  more 
gentle  terrain  is  under  cultivation.     Other  land  uses   include  logging  and 
homesite  development.     Underground  mining  for  coal  was  an   important  part 
of  the  local   economy  in  the  past.     The  physiography  of  the  study  area  was 
described  previously  (Dusek  and  McCann  1973  and  1974). 


W 


w^ 


'  ( 


£, 


Climate 

Climatological   data  were  taken  from  that  recorded  at  Roundup  (U.   S. 
Dept.   of  Comm.   1972,  1973,   1974,   1975  and  1976)   located  on  the  northern 
edge  of  the  study  area.     Monthly  data  appear  in  Table  1.     The  warmest 
monthly  temperature  normally  occurs  during  July  and  the  coldest  during 
January.     Annual   precipitation  averages  nearly  11   inches,  of  which  approxi- 
mately half  is  received  during  May,  June  and  July. 

Total   annual    precipitation  for  1975  was   18.48  inches.     The  May-July 
period  accounted  for  52  percent  of  the  total.     September  was  the  only 
month  during  1975  characterized  by  below  normal   precipitation. 

January  and  February  1976  were  characterized  by  above  normal   temper- 
atures and  monthly  precipitation  was  nearly   .2  inches  below  normal   during 
that  period  (Table  1).     These  conditions  were  similar  to  those  of  the 
same  period  during  1974. 

Vegetation 

Six  vegetation  types  were  identified  on  the  study  area  as  follows: 
grassland,  agricultural,  sagebrush-grassland,  deciduous  shrub,  ponderosa 
pine-grassland  and  ponderosa  pine.     Within  each  vegetation  type,  except 
for  the  ponderosa  pine,  two  or  three  subtypes  were  identified.     A  quanti- 
tative or  qualitative  description  of  each  type  and  subtype  appeared  in  a 
previous  report  (Dusek  and  McCann  1974). 

PHASES  OF  STUDY 

The  project  was   initially  divided  into  four  separate  parts.     This 
report  is  concerned  only  with  the  general  wildlife  ecology  study  and  the 
revegetation  study.     The  nongame  mammal   inventory  was  concluded  during 
1975  and  the  rest-rotation  grazing  study  on  the  ranch  owned  by  the 
Consolidation  Coal   Company  (Consol)  was  discontinued  because  the  company 
felt  that  improved  grazing  management  would  not  bring  in  a  desirable  monetary 
return   (pers.   comm.). 

General  Wildlife  Ecology  Study 

The  purpose  of  this  phase  was  to  conduct  an  inventory  of  game  animals 
in  the  Bull  Mountains  ecosystem  and  gather  baseline  data  related  to  distribu- 
tion and  range  use,  food  habits,  and  population  characteristics  of  those 
species  that  appeared  to  be  most  abundant  in  the  area.     Such  information 
will   be  used  to  identify  potential   conflicts  between  wildlife  and  coal 
development  and  help  determine  what  reclamation  procedures  will  best  meet 
habitat  requirements  of  wildlife. 

Observations  of  game  animals  were  facilitated  by  surveys  from  fixed- 
wing  aircraft,  by  vehicle,  or  on  foot.     When  practicable,  observed  animals 
were  classified  as  to  age  and  sex.     Vegetation  type  and  subtype,  class  of 
slope,  gradient  and  exposure  of  each  observed  animal  were  noted.     The 
estimated  distance  from  the  animal   to  the  nearest  stand  of  timber  was  also 


■3- 


Table  1 


Climatological 
February  1976. 


data  for  Roundup,  Montana,   covering  the  period  of  January  1972  through 


Temperature 

Prec 

ipitation 

Temp 

erature 
Dep.  from 

Precipitation 

Dep.  from 

Dep.  from 

Dep.  from 

Month 

Ave. 

Normal 

Total 

Normal 

Month 

Ave. 

Normal 

Total 

Normal 

January: 

July: 

1972 

17.3 

-  6.4 

.58 

.29 

1972 

68.0 

-  4.1 

1.50 

.29 

1973 

26.7 

.2 

.06 

-  .26 

1973 

71.1 

-  1.0 

.62 

-  .59 

1974 

24.9 

1.7 

trl/ 

-  .35 

1974 

- 

- 

.22 

-1.04 

1975 

24.8 

1.6 

.72 

.37 

1975 

- 

- 

2.51 

1.25 

1976 

29.6 

6.4 

.12 

-  .23 

August: 

February: 

1972 

71.4 

1.6 

3.07 

2.09 

1972 

29.5 

3.0 

.27 

-  .05 

1973 

71.9 

2.1 

1.73 

.76 

1973 

26.7 

.2 

tr 

-  .32 

1974 

65.1 

-  5.0 

3.00 

1.91 

1974 

35.8 

6.6 

tr 

-  .30 

1975 

65.5 

-  4.6 

.66 

-  .43 

1975 

17.4 

-11.8 

.30 

.00 

1976 

35.2 

6.0 

.13 

-  .17 

September: 

1972 

52.3 

-  7.3 

.81 

-  .15 

March: 

1973 

^ 

_ 

1.86 

.90 

1972 

43.0 

9.3 

.29 

-  .27 

1974 

57.0 

-  2.1 

2.22 

1.11 

1973 

36.4 

2.7 

.29 

-  .27 

1975 

58.3 

-  .8 

.26 

-  .85 

1974 

- 

- 

.17 

-  .29 

1975 

31.0 

-  2.6 

.24 

-  .22 

October: 

1972 

41.8 

-  7.4 

.91 

.09 

April : 

1973 

49.3 

.1 

2.06 

1.24 

1972 

46.3 

.6 

1.64 

.89 

1974 

51.3 

1.6 

1.18 

.57 

1973 

42.4 

-  3.3 

1.18 

.43 

1975 

48.8 

-  .9 

4.35 

3.74 

1974 

50.6 

4.7 

1.40 

.57 

1975 

39.5 

-  6.4 

1.37 

.54 

November: 

1972 

31.7 

-  4.4 

tr 

-  .36 

May: 

1973 

30.1 

-  6.0 

.46 

.10 

1972 

56.0 

.2 

3.00 

1.20 

1974 

35.0 

-  1.1 

.14 

-  .22 

1973 

55.7 

-  .1 

1.65 

-  .15 

1975 

33.9 

-  2.2 

.44 

.08 

1974 

- 

- 

2.65 

.55 

1975 

52.8 

-  2.6 

3.98 

1.88 

December: 

1972 

15.8 

-13.2 

.53 

.17 

June: 

1973 

32.2 

3.2 

.93 

.57 

1972 

68.4 

5.2 

.61 

-1.92 

1974 

_ 

„ 

.08 

-  .25 

1973 

66.3 

3.1 

2.19 

-  .34 

1975 

— 

-. 

.51 

.14 

1974 

67.5 

4.6 

1.13 

-1.71 

1975 

60.5 

-  2.4 

3.14 

.30 

JT tr  -  Trace  (aJT amount  tooTmall   to  measure) 


■  C 


recorded.  Observations  of  individually  marked  big  game  animals  were  plotted 
on  a  map  to  the  nearest  quarter  section,  or  if  possible,  to  the  nearest 
40  acres.  All  unmarked  animals  were  located  to  the  nearest  section.  Fall 
food  habits  of  big  game  animals  were  estimated  by  rumen  analysis,  and  foods 
eaten  by  turkeys  were  determined  by  crop  analysis.  Data  from  ground  and 
aerial  surveys  were  combined  in  the  following  analysis. 

Mule  Deer 


g 


Mule  deer  (Odocoileus  hemionus)   inhabit  the  entire  study  area.     A  total 
of  1,677  observations  of  individual  deer  was  made  during  the  report  period, 
including  411  and  1,266  observations  from  ground  and  aerial  surveys, 
respectively. 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 

Distribution  and  Movements 

Since  January  1973,  32  mule  deer  were  captured  and  fitted  with  color- 
coded  collars.     Included  were  three  adult  females  marked  during  January  1976, 


-5- 


but  none  of  these  were  observed  before  the  end  of  the  report  period.  Methods 
of  trapping  and  marking  appeared  in  a  previous  report  (Dusek  and  McCann 
1975).  Data  for  individually  marked  deer  that  were  relocated  one  or  more 
times  during  the  report  period  appear  in  Table  2. 

A  home  range  is  defined  as  the  area  over  which  an  animal  travels 
while  engaged  in  its  daily  activities  (Dice  1952).  A  minimum  home  range 
(Mohr  1947)  was  calculated  for  each  animal  observed  five  or  more  times  sub- 
sequent to  its  capture.  This  was  facilitated  by  connecting  the  outermost 
observation  points,  thus  forming  a  polygon,  and  calculating  the  area  inside. 
The  average  annual  home  range  for  six  adult  females  (Table  2)  was  619  acres 
(.97  sq.  mi.).  An  annual  home  range  of  709  acres  (1.11  sq.  mi.)  was  cal- 
culated for  the  adult  male. 

A  geometric  center  of  activity  was  determined  for  each  of  the  seven 
deer  (Hayne  1949).  The  distance  to  each  relocation  from  the  center  of 
activity  was  measured,  including  the  distance  to  the  capture  site.  The 
average  of  these  distances  is  known  as  the  average  radius  of  activity. 
The  average  radius  of  activity  for  each  of  the  seven  deer  appears  in  Table  2. 
When  data  from  six  adult  females  were  pooled,  the  average  radius  of  activity 
for  all  of  these  animals  was  .55  miles.  Robinette  (1966)  reported  that 
the  proportion  of  activity  of  mule  deer  decreases  as  the  distance  from  the 
center  of  activity  increases.  Sixty-four  percent  of  all  observations  of 
the  six  adult  females  occurred  within  one  standard  radius  while  98  percent 
occurred  within  two.  An  average  radius  of  activity  for  the  adult  male  was 
.67  miles.  Dasman  and  Taber  (1956)  and  Robinette  (op.   cit.)     reported  that 
mule  deer  males  exhibited  greater  mobility  than  females. 


Seasonal  movements  of  a  deer  within  its  home  range  were  perhaps  related 
to  changes  in  forage  preference  as  suggested  by  Mackie  (1970).  For  example, 
some  individually  marked  deer  were  observed  in  the  agricultural  type  along 
major  drainage  bottoms  during  spring  and/or  fall,  but  were  observed  in  native 
vegetation  types  in  the  side  drainages  during  the  remainder  of  the  year. 
Some  marked  deer  were  never  observed  in  the  agricultural  type  or  along  major 
drainages.  It  was  assumed  that  such  areas  did  not  occur  within  their  annual 
home  range.  Seasonal  movements  of  individually  marked  deer  are  represented 
in  Figures  2  and  3. 

Group  Characteristics 

Group  sizes  during  the  report  period  were  smallest  during  summer,  with 
a  mean  of  2.0  deer  per  group.   Fifty- two  percent  of  the  groups  observed 
during  summer  were  those  varying  from  2-5  deer  per  group  (Table  3).  This 
category  accounted  for  70  percent  of  the  total  deer  observed  during  summer. 
Solitary  animals  were  commonly  observed  during  early  summer.  This  was 
perhaps  related  to  fawning  activity  during  June  and  July.  Group  sizes 
started  to  increase  during  August. 

During  fall  and  winter,  group  sizes  continued  to  increase  with 
seasonal  means  of  3.2  and  5.2,  respectively.  During  fall  most  observed 
groups  varied  in  size  from  2-5  deer  (Table  3).  This  category  again  accounted 
for  70  percent  of  the  deer  observed. 


W 


( 


( 


Table  2. 


Capture  and  movement  data  for  14  individually  marked  mule  deer  that  were  observed  during 
the  report  period  ending  February  29,   1976. 


Age  &  Sex 


Date 
Marked 


i 


Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 

Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 
Adult 


F  (D- 
F  (A- 

F*(A- 


(A 
(A 
(A 
(A- 
(A- 
(A- 
(A- 
(A. 
(A 
(A. 
(A- 


■1629)1/   1/31/73 

■1714) 

■1715) 

•1717) 

■1718) 

•1719) 

•1720) 

■1721) 

1722) 

■1723) 

■1724) 

■1729) 

■1733) 

■1735) 


12/18/74 
12/18/74 
12/31/74 
1/  2/75 
1/  9/75 
1/10/75 
1/10/75 
1/17/75 
1/27/75 
2/  4/75 
2/  5/75 
2/10/75 
2/16/75 


Drainage 


Fattig  Cr. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Halfbreed  C. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 
Halfbreed  Cr. 
Fattig  Cr. 


Date  of 
last  Obser- 
vation 

2/  4/76 

2/  5/76 

2/  5/76 
10/29/75 

1/  8/76 

1/14/76 

3/18/75 

2/  5/76 

2/19/76 

2/  5/76 
12/30/75 

9/23/75 

4/19/75 

2/  4/76 


No.  of 
Reloca- 
tions 


82/ 

10 

n 

2 
3 
2 
2 

9 
11 

n 

3 
5 
4 
3 


Annual 
Home  Range 
(acres) 

550  (0.9)1/ 
533  (0.8) 
581    (0.9) 


Radius  of 
Activity  (mi . ) 

.56 
.59 
.58 


578  (0.9) 

.50 

952  (1.5) 
522  (0.8) 

.54 

.52 

709   (1.1) 


.67 


]_/  Number  on  metal  ear  tag. 

2/  Capture  not  included. 

3/  Home  range  in  square  miles. 

*  The  animal  was  a  yearling  when  marked. 


Adult  Male 
(A-1729) 


r*\. 


Adult    Female 
(D-1629) 


LEGEND: 

PAVED    ROAD     

INTERMITTENT    STREAMS 


RELOCATIONS    OF    ADULT    MULE   DEER: 

SPRING 

SUMMER 

FALL 

WINTER 


Scale 


B 


CAPTURE    SITE 


0       12      3  Miles 


Figure  2.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  an  adult  male  mule  deer 
captured  during  February  1975  and  an  adult  female  captured 
during  January  1973  in  the  Fattig  Creek  drainage. 


V 


X. 


Adult  Female        \  \ 

(A-1715)  :' 


X 


x; 


s'  o4-; 


/ 


v    r)  ^ 


/ '  r 


r-T 


Adult     Female 
(A-1722) 


LEGEND: 

Paunri     Road 

■c/ 

Intermittent     Streams 

Relocations    Of    Adult   Mule 
Spring 

Deer: 

r 

^timmpr 

- — ■  ♦ 

Fall   

* 

o 

Scale 

Winter 

|— 

-I       I       I 

Captlira     Sit" 

0 

1       2      3 

Figure  3.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  two  adult  female  mule 
deer  captured  during  December  1974  and  January  1975  in  the 
Halfbreed  Creek  drainage. 


Table  3.      Frequency  among  group  sizes  and  average  group  size  of  mule 
deer  by  season  during  the  report  period. 


Groups 

of  Mule  Deer 

Number  per 

1  Group 

Ave. 

Season 

1 

2-5               6-10 

11-15 

16  Plus 

Size 

Spring  1975 

3/ll/ 

51/29            32/37 

9/15 

5/18 

6.5 

Summer  1975 

46/23 

52/70             2/   7 

-/- 

-/- 

2.0 

Fall   1975 

20/   6 

69/70           11/24 

-/- 

-/- 

3.2 

Winter  1975-76         8/   1 

57/35           25/36 

6/15 

4/12 

5.2 

1/  Percent  of 
total  deer 

total   groups  observed  during 
observed  during  a  respective 

a  respective 
season. 

season/Percent  of 

During  spring  1975,  an  average  group  size  of  6.5  animals  was  recorded. 
The  largest  groups  observed  throughout  the  year  were  observed  during  spring. 
This  is  perhaps  at  least  partly  related  to  the  concentration  of  deer  on 
open  vegetation  types,  particularly  the  agricultural   type.     Such  areas 
appeared  to  green-up  earlier  than  other  vegetation  types. 

Although  the  size  and  composition  of  groups  of  mule  deer  change 
seasonally,  the  yearlong  distribution  of  deer  throughout  the  study  area 
appeared  to  change  very  little,   if  at  all    (Dusek  and  McCann  1975).     This, 
together  with  movement  data  from  individually  marked  deer,  tends  to  sub- 
stantiate the  conclusion  that  mule  deer  in  the  Bull  Mountains  ecosystem 
are  nonmigra to ry. 

Use  of  Vegetation  Types 

Observations  of  mule  deer  were  facilitated  by  periods  of  activity 
such  as  feeding.     Following  these  periods,  or  when  alarmed,  mule  deer 
used  stands  of  timber  for  escape  cover.     Since  only  the  vegetation  type 
and  subtype  that  deer  occupied  when  first  observed  were  recorded,  the 
actual   importance  of  timbered  types  to  deer  was  perhaps  underestimated. 
Seasonal   changes   in  relative  use  of  vegetation  types  during  this  report 
period  (Table  4)   generally  followed  a  pattern  similar  to  that  of  previous 
years  unless  otherwise  noted  (Dusek  and  McCann  1973,  1974  and  1975). 

Spring:     The  grassland  and  agricultural    types,  combined,  accounted 
for  78  percent  of  the  use  during  spring  1975.     The  grassland  park  and 
hay  meadow  subtypes   received  most  of  the  use  within  their  respective 
types   (Table  4)   during  1975,  as  opposed  to  the  drainageway  and  cropland 
subtypes  during  1974.      During  spring  1975  the  agricultural   type  received 
its  greatest  seasonal    use  between  April   21   and  May  18,  perhaps  due  to  an 
earlier  "green-up"  on   that  type  than  on  nonagri cultural   types.     As 
succulent  growth  became  abundant  on  the  nonagri cultural    types,  an  abrupt 
shift  to  these  types  occurred.     This  pattern  of  use  occurred  approximately 
1  month  earlier  during  1974,  perhaps  due  to  climatological   differences 
between  the  2  years   (Table  1). 


-10- 


~ 


f 


c 


c 


Table  4.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetational  types  by  mule  deer  as  determined  by  1677  observations  during 
the  report  period. 


Se 

ason 

Vegetation  Type 

Spring  1975 
(600)1/ 

162/ 
11 

12 

Summer 
(277) 

17 

8 
6 

1975 

Fall   1975 
(386) 

22 
11 

9 

Winter  1975-76 
(414) 

Grassland  Type: 
Grassland  Park  Subtype 
Drainageway  Subtype 
Burn  Subtype 

11 
6 
8 

TOTAL 

Agricultural   Type: 
Cropland 
Hay  Meadow 

39 

15 
24 

31 

8 
21 

42 

28 
14 

25 

27 
6 

TOTAL 

Sagebrush-Grassland  Type: 
Silver  Sagebrush-Grassland  ! 
Big  Sagebrush-Grassland  Sub 

Subtype 
type 

39 
5 

29 

2 
5 

42 

3 

33 
2 

TOTAL 

Deciduous  Shrub  Type: 
Skunkbush-Grassland  Subtype 
Snowberry  Subtype 

5 

2 

7 

1 
6 

3 

5 
3 

2 
trl/ 

TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine-Grassland  Type: 
Ponderosa  Pine-Bunchgrass  Subtype 
Ponderosa  Pine-Juniper  Subtype 

2 
15 

7 

24 
2 

8 

5 

2 

34 
2 

TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine  Type: 

15 

26 

5 

36 
1 

]_/   Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 

2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 

3/  Trace  -  a  value  less  than  1  percent  of  seasonal  observations, 


Summer:     Summer  1975  was  characterized  by  decreased  use  of  the 
grassland  and  agricultural   types  and  increased  use  of  the  ponderosa 
pine-grassland  type  as  compared  to  spring  (Table  4).     The  grassland 
park,  hay  meadow  and  ponderosa  pine-bunchgrass  subtypes  received  the 
greatest  use  in  the  respective  types.     The  combined  use  of  the  grass- 
land and  agricultural   types  accounted  for  60  percent  of  the  seasonal 
observations. 


„ 


Fall :     During  fall    1975  the  grassland  and  agricultural   types  re- 
their  greatest  yearlong  use,   each  accounting  for  42  percent  of 
observations.     The  grassland  park  and  cropland  subtypes 

The 


cei ved 
the  seasonal 

received  most  of  the  use  within  the  respective  types   (Table  4). 
ponderosa  pine-grassland  type  received  its  lowest  observed  yearlong 
use  during  fall.      Fall    1975  was  characterized  by  cooler  and  wetter 
conditions  than  normally  prevail   during  this  time  of  year  (Table  1). 
Resulting  "green-ups"  may  have  induced  greater  use  by  deer  of  the  grass- 
land and  agricultural   types,  particularly  the  cropland  subtype. 


Winter:     Winter  1975-76  was  characterized  by  comparatively  mild 
climatological   conditions,  similar  to  those  of  the  winters  of  1972-73 
and  1973-74  (Dusek  and  McCann  1973  and  1974).     The  ponderosa  pine- 
grassland  type,  which  accounted  for  36  percent  of  the  seasonal  ob- 
servations,  received  the  greatest  seasonal    usage.     The  grassland  type 
received  its  lowest  yearlong  usage.     The  relatively  high  use  of  the 
agricultural   type  during  this  season  reflected  an  increase  in  observa- 
tions on  that  type  during  late  February.     Abnormally  warm  temperatures 
prior  to  and  during  that  period  caused  a  noticeable  "green-up"   in  the 
cropland  subtype  and  may  have  influenced  the  heavy  use  of  the  agricultural 
type  during  this  winter.     The  sagebrush-grassland  received  abnormally  low 
use  during  this  winter  as   compared  to  other  years. 


Relation  to  Timber 

Most  of  the  deer  observed  occurred  within  0-100  feet  of  the  nearest 
stand  of  timber  throughout  the  report  period  (Table  5).     More  than  60 
percent  occurred  within  300  feet  of  the  nearest  stand  of  timber.     During 
spring  60  percent  of  the  observations  were  evenly  distributed  between 
the  100-300,   300-600  and  600  plus  classes.     This  perhaps  reflected  seasonal 
preference  for  vegetation  types.     During  summer,  fall   and  winter,  8  percent 
of  the  seasonal   observations  occurred  at 
while  50  percent  or  more  occurred  within 
of  timber.     Generally  these  data  reflect 
previous  year  (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 


distances  greater  than  600  feet, 
0-100  feet  of  the  nearest  stand 
the  same  trend  observed  the 


S^' 


•12- 


c 


Table  5.  Occurrence  of  mule  deer  at  various  distances  from  the  nearest 
stand  of  timber,  determined  from  1677  ground  and  aerial 
observations. 


Distance  Class 

Spring  1975 
(600)1/ 

Summer 
(277) 

1975 

Fall    1975 
(386) 

Winter  1975-76 
(414) 

0-100  ft. 

422/ 

57 

50 

54 

100-300  ft. 

19 

18 

26 

16 

300-600  ft. 

20 

17 

17 

22 

Over  600  ft. 

19 

8 

8 

8 

1/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


Use  of  Slopes 

Seasonal  use  of  six  classes  of  topographical  features  by  mule  deer 
appears  in  Table  6.  Coulee  and  creek  bottoms,  ridges  and  plateaus  were 
collectively  termed  flatlands,  while  sidehills  and  coulee  heads  were 
separated  into  three  classes  based  on  degree  of  slope  (Table  7). 


Table  6,  Seasonal  use  of  various  topographical  features  by  mule  deer  as 
determined  from  1677  ground  and  aerial  observations  during  the 
report  period. 


Season 


Spring  1975  (600)1/ 
Summer  1975  (277) 
Fall  1975  (386) 
Winter  1975-76  (414) 


Sidehill 

Topographical 
Coulee       Creek 
Bottom       Bottom 

Feature 
Ri  dge 

Pla 

teau 

Coulee 
Head 

39i/ 

12 

18 

7 

15 

9 

38 

14 

5 

5 

30 

9 

22 

9 

14 

4 

42 

9 

38 

10 

3 

11 

30 

9 

V  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


-13- 


Table  7.     Seasonal   use  of  gradients  by  mule  deer  during  the  report  period. 


Gradient 

Spring 
(600), 

1975 
1/ 

Summer 
(277) 

1975 

Fall   1975 
(386) 

Winter  1975-76 
(414) 

Flat?./ 

521/ 

56 

69 

53 

Gentle  (0-15°) 

36 

25 

24 

39 

Medium  16-30°) 

10 

15 

7 

7 

Steep  (31-450) 

2 

4 

1 

2 

y  Seasonal  sample  size. 

2/  Includes  coulee  bottoms,  creek  bottoms,  ridges  and  plateaus 

3/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


Flatlands  accounted  for  more  than  50  percent  of  the  deer  observed 
during  each  season  throughout  the  report  period  with  the  greatest  usage 
occurring  during  fall   (Table  7).      During  spring  1975  creek  bottoms  received 
their  greatest  yearlong  usage  (Table  6).     Plateaus  accounted  for  the 
greatest  usage  among  flatlands  during  the  remainder  of  the  year,  but  re- 
ceived their  greatest  use  during  fall. 

Steep  slopes  received  only  minor  use  throughout  the  report  period. 
Use  of  gentle  and  medium  slopes  combined  was  greatest  during  spring  and 
winter  (Table  7).     Forty-six  percent  of  the  observations  occurred  on  these 
two  classes  of  gradient  during  spring  and  winter.     Sidehills  accounted 
for  more  than  one-third  of  the  total   usage  during  all   seasons  except  fall 
(Table  6).     The  overall   trend  is  similar  to  that  observed  during  the  pre- 
vious year  (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 

Use  of  Exposures 

During  winter  1975-76,  53  percent  of  the  observations  of  mule  deer 
associated  with  some  degree  of  slope  occurred  on  southerly  exposures 
(Table  8).  Those  exposures  also  received  considerable  use  during  spring. 
During  summer,  no  definite  trend  was  apparent.  Northerly  and  easterly 
exposures  received  considerable  use  during  fall. 


^^^z 


-14- 


V* 


Table  8.  Seasonal  use  of  eight  exposures  by  mule  deer  as  determined  from 
734  observations  during  the  report  period. 


l^  ■ 


Season 

North 

East 

Sou 

th 

West 

NE 

NW 

SE 

SW 

Spring  1975 
(290)1/ 

121/ 

14 

24 

6 

5 

8 

17 

16 

Summer  1975 
(128) 

20 

15 

11 

6 

18 

8 

n 

11 

Fall  1975 
(120) 

16 

22 

8 

- 

18 

10 

14 

9 

Winter  1975- 
(196) 

76 

19 

- 

33 

2 

5 

20 

14 

6 

V  Sample  size  occurring  on  some  degree  of  slope  during  a  respective  season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations  associated  with  some  degree  of  slope. 


3 


Fall   Food  Habits 

Food  habits  for  fall   1975  were  estimated  from  rumen  samples  from  three 
deer  taken  by  hunters  during  October  and  November  (Table  9).     Browse, 
forbs  and  grasses  constituted  56,  41   and  1   percent,  respectively,  by  volume 
Snowberry  ( Symphoriaarpos  spp.J,  which  occurred  in  all   three  samples  and 
averaged  41   percent  by  volume,  was  the  most  important  single  item  used. 
Other  browse  included  Oregon  grape  (Berberis  repens) _,  wild  rose  (Rosa  spp.J 
and  silver  sagebrush   (Artemisia  oana)  {7db\&  9).     Alfalfa  (Medicago  sativa) , 
which  occurred  almost  exclusively  in  the  agricultural   type,  averaged  35 
percent  and  was  the  most  abundant  forb  in  the  samples.     Other  forbs  included 
aster  (Aster  Spp.J   and  common  salsify  (Tragopogon  dubius) . 


Population  Characteristics 

During  spring  1975,  a  fawn:adult  ratio  of  24:100  was  calculated.     This 
compared  closely  with  data  collected  during  the  previous  winter  (Dusek 
and  McCann  1975). 

Fawn: doe  and  fawn: adult  ratios  were  not  calculated  from  summer  ob- 
servations, since  fawns  were  not  readily  observed  until  August.     The  buck: 
doe  ratio  of  70:100  calculated  during  summer  1975  was  considerably  higher 
than  during  the  following  fall   and  winter  (Table  10),  and  may  reflect  an 
observability  bias.     One  reason  for  this  may  be  a  differential   use  of 
vegetation  types  by  bucks  and  does  during  summer.     For  example,  the  buck:doe 
ratio  calculated  from  observations  in  the  ponderosa  pine-grassland  type 
was  33:100,  while  that  from  deer  observed  in  open  vegetation  types,  com- 
bined, was  86:100.     Many  does  were  observed  as  solitary  animals,  especially 


15- 


Table  9.      Fall   food  habits  of  mule  deer  as  determined  from  examination 
of  rumen  contents  of  three  hunter-killed  mule  deer. 


Taxa 


Browse: 

Artemisia  carta 
Berberis  repens 
Pinus  ponder osa 
Rhus   trilobata 
Rosa  spp. 

Symphoricarpos   spp. 
Unidentified  Browse 


Total  Browse 


Forbs: 


Aster   spp. 
Medicago  sativa 
Tragopogon  dubius 
Unidentified  Forbs 


Total  Forbs 

Grasses: 

Tritiaum   spp. 
Unidentified  Grasses 


Total  Grasses 


October-November 
1975 
3  Rumens 


67/  ll/ 

33/  6 

33/trU 

67/tr 
100/  4 
100/41 
100/  4 


100/56 


67/  1 

67/35 

33/  1 

100/  4 


100/41 


33/ tr 
100/  1 


100/  1 


1/  Frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  rumens )/percent  of  diet. 
2/  tr   -  Trace  (a  value  less  than  .5  percent). 


.. 


during  June  and  July,  while  bucks  were  often  observed  in  groups  of  two  or 
more.  Solitary  animals  were  sometimes  more  difficult  to  spot,  especially 
from  aerial   surveys,   than  were  groups  of  two  or  more  animals. 

During  fall,   fawn:doe  and  fawn:adult  ratios  were  38:100  and  29:100, 
respectively  (Table  10).     The  observed  buck:doe  ratio  during  this  period 
was  33:100.     The  same  ratio  calculated  for  adult  deer  observed  in  open 
vegetation  types  was  35:100.     Only  15  adult  deer  were  observed  in  the 
ponderosa  pine-grassland  type  during  fall   and  all  were  does.     Most  fall 
observations  were  made  prior  to  the  hunting  season. 


There  was  no 
winter  (Table  10). 
The  buck: doe  ratio 
during  fal 1 .  Duri 
use  of  timbered  an 
proportion  of  unci 
Based  on  fall  obse 
of  the  population 
observations,   the 


observed  chan 
The  fawn: ad 
of  19:100  wa 
ng  winter  the 
d  nontimbered 
assified  adul 
rvations,  the 
consisting  of 
increment  was 


ge  in  the  fawn: doe  ratio  between  fall   and 
ult  ratio  increased  slightly  to  30:100. 
s  considerably  less  than  that  observed 
re  did  not  appear  to  be  any  differential 

types  by  bucks  and  does.     Perhaps  a  larger 
ts  and  unclassified  deer  were  adult  bucks. 

calculated  annual    increment,  or  proportion 

fawns,  was  22  percent.     Based  on  winter 

23  percent. 


W 


■16- 


f 


Table  10.     Population  characteristics  of  mule  deer  as  determined  from  1675  ground  and  aerial  observa- 
tions from  March  1975  through  February  1976. 


Adults 

Fawns 
87 

Unci. 
Sex  & 
Age 

153 

Total 
600 

Fawns : 
100  Does 

Fawns : 
100  Adults 

24 

Bucks: 

Season 

Does 
26 

Bucks 

6 

Unci. 
328 

Total 
360 

100  Does 

Spring  1975 

- 

Summer  1975 

140 

98 

2 

240 

35 

- 

275 

- 

- 

70 

Fall  1975 

225 

75 

- 

300 

86 

- 

386 

38 

29 

33 

Winter  1975- 

76 

208 

40 

11 

259 

79 

76 

414 

38 

30 

19 

-^1 

! 


Elk 

Prior  to  1973,   there  had  been  no  hunting  season  on  elk   (Cervus 
canadensis)   in  the  Bull   Mountains.      Five  archery  permits  were  issued 
during  fall   1973  for  a  portion  of  hunting  district  590  which  consisted 
of  surface  owned  or  leased  by  Consol.     During  1974,   the  Consol   property 
was  again  open  to  archers,  and  five  rifle  permits  were  also  issued 
during  the  general  big  game  season.     No  elk  were  reported  killed  during 
either  year.     Ten  rifle  permits  were  issued  for  the  general   season  during 
1975  for  the  same  portion  of  hunting  district  590.     Three  elk  were  taken, 
which  included  two  bulls  and  one  cow. 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 

A  total   of  1,426  observations  of  individual   elk  were  made  during 
the  report  period.     Most  of  these  were  obtained  from  aerial   surveys. 

Distribution  and  Movements 

Elk  occupy  a  portion  of  the  Bull  Mountains  west  of  U.   S.   87  which 
includes  the  upper  portions  of  Pompey's  Pillar,  Railroad,  Hawk,  Fattig, 
Parrot  and  Halfbreed  Creeks   (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 

Seven  adult  cows  were  captured  and  equipped  with  individually 
identifiable  collars  during  the  winters  of  1974  and  1975.     Methods  of 
capturing  and  marking  were  discussed  in  a  previous   report  (Dusek  and 
McCann  1975).     Capture,   relocation  and  home  range  data  appear  in  Table  11. 
One  hundred  fifty-nine  relocations  were  obtained  subsequent  to  the 
capture  of  the  seven  animals. 

Annual   home  ranges  were  calculated  for  five  of  the  seven  elk 
(Table  11)   in  the  same  manner  as  those  of  mule  deer.     The  average  annual 
home  range  for  those  animals  was  35.4  square  miles,  which  was  comparable 
with  that  reported  for  adult  cow  elk  in  the  Missouri  breaks   (Knowles  1975). 

The  portion  of  the  Bull   Mountains  occupied  by  elk,  as  well   as  annual 
home  ranges  of  individually  marked  adult  cows,  were  differentially 
utilized  throughout  the  year.      It  was  also  apparent  that  some  portions 
of  annual   home  ranges  of  adult  cows  were  used  wery  little,  if  at  all 
(Figures  4,  5,  6,   7  and  8).     The  summer  home  range  of  adult  cows  was  con- 
sidered the  portion  of  the  annual   home  range  where  the  animal  was  ob- 
served from  June  through  mid-October  (Table  11).     Two  adult  cows   (Nos.   1 
and  2)   occupied  the  same  portion  of  their  annual   home  range  during  that 
period  of  two  consecutive  years   (Figures  4  and  5).     The  average  summer 
home  range  size  for  five  adult  cows  was  5.2  square  miles. 

Marked  adult  cows  were  generally  observed  on  what  was  considered 
the  winter  home  range  from  December  through  mid-April.     Size  of  the 
winter  home  range  varied  considerably  between  the  seven  animals  (Table  11), 
but  averaged  11.5  square  miles.     Nos.   6  and  7,  both  marked  in  upper 
Pompey's  Pillar  Creek  during  January  1975,  were  observed  in  the  same 


■18- 


to 

I 


r  c 


Table  11.  Capture  and  movement  data  for  seven  adult  cow  elk  captured  and  individually  marked  during 
the  winters  of  1974  and  1975. 


Ear  Tag 

Number 

Date 

Marked 

Drainage 

Where 

Marked 

Date  of  Last 
Observation 

Number 
Relocat 

of 
ions 

Home 

Range  (sq. 

mi . ) 

No. 

Annual 

Summer 

W  i  n  te  r 

1 

- 

2/  4/74 

Fattig  Cr. 

2/  5/76 

27 

29.9 

6.2 

11.4 

2 

A- 1709 

2/  6/74 

Fattig  Cr. 

11/  4/75 

40 

35.2 

3.5 

23.0 

3 

A- 1708 

1/   8/75 

Fattig  Cr. 

2/19/76 

24 

33.2 

6.5 

8.2 

4 

A-1707 

1/   8/75 

Hawk  Cr. 

2/24/76 

21 

38.7 

3.9 

10.7 

5 

D-1635 

1/  9/75 

Railroad  Cr 

2/10/76 

15 

- 

- 

13.0 

6 

A-1711 

1/10/75 

Pompey's   Pi 

11 

ar 

Cr. 

2/24/76 

19 

40.0 

6.1 

7.4 

7 

A-1712 

1/10/76 

Pompey's   Pi 

11 

ar 

Cr. 

2/19/76 

13 

- 

- 

6.5 

.^J 


IT 


I 


LEGEND= 
PAVED  ROAD 


INTERMITTENT  STREAM 

RELOCATIONS   OF  AN  ADULT  COW  ELK: 

SPRING 

SUMMER    

FALL 


WINTER 


CAPTURE  SITE 


Scale 


0       12      3  Miles 


Figure  4.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No,  1  from 
February  1974  through  February  1976t 


-20- 


.....   A 

\ 

3 J 

\ 

\ 

1 

<y  "X 


\v 


LEGEND= 

PAVED  ROAD     

INTERMITTENT   STREAM    

RELOCATIONS   OF   AN    ADULT   COW   ELK: 

SPRING 

SUMMER 

FALL 


WINTER 


Scale 

^       I— I 

0       12      3  Miles 


CAPTURE  SITE 


Figure  5,  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  2  from 
February  1974  through  February  1976. 


-21- 


V 

\ 

t 

\             1 

i 

■, 

[' 

^ . 

1 1 

Kj 

i 

1 


I 


LEGEND^ 

PAVED    ROAD 


Scale 


INTERMITTENT    STREAM  

OBSERVATIONS  OF   COW  ELK   #3: 

SPRING  

MAY 


0       12       3  Miles 


SUMMER 
FALL 


NOVEMBER 
WINTER  


■^J 


CAPTURE  SITE 


Figure  6.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No.  3  during 
the  period  of  January  8,  1975  through  February  29,  1976. 

-22- 


c 


*!s 

/      1 

i       / 

\     r 
\ 

J 

\        "V 

\ 

-V.      ' 


N 


^ 


~\ 


N 


: 


LEGEND^ 

PAVED    ROAD 


INTERMITTENT    STREAM 


OBSERVATIONS  OF    COW   ELK  #4: 
SPRING  

MAY 

SUMMER 

FALL 


NOVEMBER 
WINTER   


r\.,  r 


Scale 


0       12      3  Miles 


CAPTURE  SITE 


Figure  7.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No,  4  during  the 
period  of  January  8,  1975  through  February  29,  1976, 


_, 


*\ 


iC.r 

o- . 


i  <&'\  / 


)     x 


<* 


J$>    \        ; 


< 


/'     '' 

.-A 


1 


X 


/ 


rr  i 


v. 


,.x^1-' 


>'  -^ ' 

'jf\     "  O'.U^     N    HAWK 

i  BjirSSEbSHELl    COUNT* 


V 


W3 


>}    ^ 


"N 


1 

IT 


LEGEND: 


PAVED    ROAD 


INTERMITTENT    STREAM 


OBSERVATIONS  OF    COW    ELK  #6^ 

SPRING 

MAY 


SUMMER- 
FALL  


NOVEMBER 
WINTER   


CAPTURE  SITE- 


n. 


Scale 
0       12      3  Miles 


Figure  8.  Seasonal  distribution  and  movements  of  cow  elk  No,  6  during  the 
period  of  January  10,  1975  through  February  29,  1976, 


■24- 


^ 


general   area,  which  also  included  Railroad  Creek,  during  that  and  the 
following  winter  (Figure  8).     Those  marked  on  Consol's  property  (Nos.   1 
through  5)   had  larger  winter  home  ranges  and  their  use  appeared  more 
variable.     Marked  cows  occurred  almost  anywhere  within  their  annual   home 
range  during  May  and  November.     These  appeared  to  be  periods  of  movement 
between  summer  and  winter  home  ranges. 

Centers  of  activity  (Hayne  1949)  were  calculated  for  summer  and/or 
winter  home  ranges  of  the  seven  marked  cows.     May  and  November  data  were 
not  used  for  these  calculations.     The  average  distance  traveled  between 
summer  and  winter  home  ranges,  expressed  as  the  average  straight  line 
distance  between  the  two  centers  of  activity  for  each  of  five  cows,  was 
6.1   miles   (Table  12). 

The  average  radius  of  activity  for  five  and  seven  cows  during  the 
June-October  and  December-April   periods,   respectively,  appears  in  Table  12. 
During  the  June-October  period,  76  percent  of  the  observed  activity 
occurred  within  1.5  miles  of  the  center  of  activity  of  each  animal, 
while  96  percent  occurred  within  3.0  miles.     Fifty-eight  percent  of  the 
observed  activity  occurred  within  2.1  miles  of  centers  of  activity  during 
the  December-April   period,  while  91   percent  occurred  within  4.2  miles. 
This  also  suggested  that  adult  cow  elk  exhibited  greater  mobility  and 
areas  of  activity  were  greater  during  winter  and  early  spring  than  during 
summer  and  early  fall.     The  fact  that  mean  consecutive  distances  as  well 
as  mean  maximum  distances  between  observations  of  individual   animals 
were  smallest  during  summer  and  fall   and  greatest  during  winter  and  spring 
further  substantiates  that  conclusion   (Table  12).     These  data  compare 
closely  to  that  of  Mackie  (1970),   Knowles   (1975)   and  Komberec  (1976)   for 
the  Missouri  breaks. 

It  was  previously  determined  that  two  distinct  elk  summer  ranges 
occurred  in  the  Bull   Mountains   (Dusek  and  McCann  1975).     Based  on  sightings 
of  both  marked  and  unmarked  elk  during  the  report  period,  it  is  my  opinion 
that  these  summer  ranges  are  occupied  by  two  separate  segments  of  the 
population.     One,   including  at  least  four  marked  adult  cows   (Nos.   1,  2, 
3  and  4),   occurred  on  the  upper  east  side  of  Hawk  Creek  during  the  June- 
October  period  (Figures  4,  5,  6  and  7).     No.    5  is  perhaps  part  of  this 
segment,  but  summer  data  for  that  animal  were  lacking  and  fall   data  were 
sparse.     The  other  segment,  which  included  Nos.   6  and  7,  occupied  upper 
Halfbreed  and  Parrot  Creeks  as  well   as  the  upper  west  side  of  Fattig 
Creek  (Figure  8).     No.    7  was  only  observed  once  during  the  summer- fall 
period,  but  it  occurred  in  Halfbreed  Creek. 

During  the  December-April    period,   the  situation  was  more  complex. 
As  mentioned  previously,  Nos.   6  and  7  were  observed  exclusively  in  upper 
Pompey's  Pillar  and  Railroad  Creeks  in  northern  Yellowstone  County  during 
the  winters  of  1975  and  1975-76.     On  several   occasions   during  those 
winters,  between  40  and  60  head  of  elk  were  observed  in  that  area.     Nos.    1, 
2,   3  and  4,  which  represented  the  Hawk  Creek  segment,  were  all  marked  in 
the  Fattig  and  Hawk  Creek  drainages  on  Consol's  property  (Figure  1).     All 
were  observed  in  the  Railroad  Creek  drainage  several   times  between  February 
and  April,   1975  and  No.    3  was  observed  several   times  in  Pompey's  Pillar 
Creek.     No.    5  was  marked  along  the  divide  between   Fattig  and  Railroad  Creeks, 
and  observed  in  that  area  until  mid-February  1975.      It  then  moved  further 


■25- 


ro 
1 


Table  12.  Seasonal  radius  of  activity,  distances  between  consecutive  observations,  mean  maximum 
distances  between  observations,  and  distances  between  centers  of  activity  of  seven 
individually  marked  adult  cow  elk  in  the  Bull  Mountains. 


Radius  of 
Activity  (mi.) 

Consecutive  Distances 
Between  Observations (mi. ) 
Spr.       Sum.       Fall       Win. 

1.6         2.4         1.7         3.3 

Maximum  Distances 
Between  0bservations( 
Spr.           Sum.       Fall 

3.50           6.25       4.00 

mi . ) 
Win. 

8.50 

Distance  Between 
Centers  of  Activity 

No. 

Jun.-Oct. 
1.2   (11)1/ 

Dec. -Apr. 
2.5   (14) 

Miles 

1 

5.3 

2 

1.0   (22) 

3.0   (11) 

2.9 

1.0 

1.9         2.2 

10.25 

1.75 

4.50 

6.50 

4.0 

3 

1.6   (   6) 

1.4   (16) 

3.5 

1.3 

3.2          1.6 

8.00 

1.75 

5.50 

6.00 

9.0 

4 

1.1    (12) 

3.6   (    7) 

4.6 

1.6 

.8         2.8 

7.00 

4.00 

1.75 

5.00 

4.6 

5 

- 

1.8  (15) 

2.4 

- 

2.0 

5.00 

- 

- 

6.00 

- 

6 

2.4   (    4) 

1.3   (16) 

1.2 

3.2* 

1.6         3.2 

2.75 

3.25* 

2.50 

7.00 

7.4 

7 

- 

1.2   (12) 

1.6 

3.7* 

1.8 

3.00 

3.75* 

- 

3.25 

- 

Ave. 

1.5 

2.1 

2.5 

2.2 

1.8         2.4 

5.6 

3.5 

3.6 

6.00 

6.1 

V  Number  of  relocations  during  a  respective  period. 
*  Only  one  measurement  was  available. 


C  O  '  O 


\m* 


south  into  Railroad  Creek.     During  the  winter  of  1975-76  (Dec. -Feb.): 
No.   1  was  observed  in  both  the  Fattig  and  Railroad  Creek  drainages,  No.   2 
was  not  observed  at  all,  Nos.   3  and  5  spent  the  entire  winter  in  Railroad 
and  Pompey's  Pillar  Creeks  with  Nos.  6  and  7,  and  No.   4  remained  in  the 
Fattig  and  Hawk  Creek  drainages. 

Specific  sites  where  elk  were  observed  throughout  the  year  were 
those  where  cattle  were  few  in  number  or  absent.     When  large  groups  of 
cattle  were  turned  into  areas  that  elk  had  previously  occupied,  especially 
during  fall,  elk  were  no  longer  observed  in  such  areas. 

Consol's  property,   in  the  Fattig  and  Hawk  Creek  drainages,  re- 
ceived rather  heavy  use  by  livestock  during  the  winter  of  1974-75,  but 
this  usage  was  much  lighter  during  the  following  winter  of  1975-76.     The 
portions  of  Pompey's  Pillar  and  Railroad  Creeks,  were  elk  occurred,  re- 
ceived little  or  no  use  by  livestock  during  either  winter.     This  may 
partially  explain  differences  in  winter  home  range  size  and  movements 
between  elk  marked  in  Pompey's  Pillar  Creek  and  those  marked  on  Consol's 
property  (Tables  11  and  12).     Knowles   (1975)  and  Komberec  (1976)  reported 
livestock  distribution  to  be  a  major  factor  influencing  elk  distribution 
within  a  rest-rotation  grazing  system  in  the  Missouri  breaks.     The 
mobility  of  elk  appeared  to  allow  them  to  seek  out  the  most  favorable 
range  and  forage  conditions. 


Group  Characteristics 

Average  group  sizes  were  largest  during  fall  and  winter  and  smallest 
during  spring  and  summer  (Table  13).     This  trend  was  similar  to  that  ob- 
served during  previous  years  (Dusek  and  McCann  1974  and  1975).     Elk 
were  quite  gregarious  throughout  the  year,  although  a  greater  proportion 
of  solitary  animals  was  observed  during  spring  and  summer  than  during 
fall  or  winter  (Table  13).     This  was  largely  influenced  by  observations 
of  adult  cows  during  May  and  June  and  was  perhaps  related  to  calving. 
Calves  were  first  observed  on  June  12. 


Table  13.     Frequency  among  group  sizes  and  average  group  sizes  of  elk 
by  season  during  the  report  period. 


Groups 

of  Elk 

Season 

1 
27/  51/ 

2-5 
43/29 

6-10 
20/30 

n-15 

4/10 

16-20 
3/10 

21  + 
3/16 

Average 
Size 

Spring  1975 

5.0 

Summer  1975 

22/  4 

49/30 

18/25 

4/  9 

4/14 

3/17 

5.1 

Fall    1975 

15/  2 

40/18 

13/13 

15/23 

13/28 

4/16 

8.0 

Winter  1975- 

76 

10/  2 

45/27 

31/37 

12/25 

-/- 

2/   8 

6.0 

]_/  Percent  c 
of  total 

)f  total   groups  observed  durin 
elk  observed  during  a  respect 

g  a  respective 
ive  season. 

season/Percent 

•27- 


Yearling,  or  "spike,"  bulls  were  often  observed  with  cow/calf  groups 
throughout  the  summer,  but  older  bulls  were  not  observed  accompanying 
these  groups  until   the  last  week  of  August.     Mature  bulls  were  observed 
with  cow/calf  groups  throughout  fall   and  were  observed  showing  aggressive 
behavior  toward  other  bulls  during  September.      During  winter  1975-76  bulls 
were  generally  not  observed  with  cow/calf  groups. 

Based  on  observations  of  groups  containing  one  or  more  individually 
marked  cows,   composition  of  individuals  within  groups   appeared  to  change 
quite  often.     Cow/calf  groups  were  generally  closely  associated  on  seasonal 
herd  ranges. 

Use  of  Vegetation  Types 

Relative  use  among  vegetation  types  throughout  the  report  period  was 
similar  to  that  observed  during  the  previous  year  (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 
Results  appear  in  Table  14. 

Spring:     The  grassland  type  accounted  for  59  percent  of  the  observed 
use  among  vegetation  types  during  spring  1975.     This  was  confined  almost 
exclusively  to  the  grassland  park  subtype.     The  agricultural   type  received 
only  8  percent  of  the  seasonal   use  as  compared  to  27  percent  during  the 
previous  year.     Elk  were  not  observed  using  that  type  until  about  mid-May 
1975  as  compared  to  early  April   1974.     Abnormally  cool   and  wet  climatological 
conditions  during  spring  1975  perhaps  retarded  growth  of  succulent  vegeta- 
tion and  such  areas  were  not  attractive  to  elk  until  mid-May  1975.     The 
ponderosa  pine-grassland  type  also  received  considerable  use,  all  of  which 
was  observed  in  the  ponderosa  pine-bunchgrass  subtype  (Table  14). 

Summer:     The  agricultural   type,  which  accounted  for  42  percent  of  the 
seasonal  observations,  received  its  greatest  yearlong  use  during  summer  1975. 
This  was  followed  by  the  grassland  and  ponderosa  pine-grassland  types 
(Table  14). 

Fal 1 :     Seventy-two  percent  of  the  seasonal   use  was  quite  evenly 
distributed  among  the  grassland  and  agricultural   types   (Table  14).     The 
grassland  park  and  cropland  subtypes  received  most  of  the  use  within  the 
respective  types.     Use  of  the  deciduous  shrub  type  increased  over  spring 
and  summer,  all  of  which  occurred  in  the  snowberry  subtype. 

Winter:     The  grassland  type  accounted  for  its  greatest  yearlong  use 
during  winter  1975-76,  accounting  for  66  percent  of  the  seasonal  observations. 
The  grassland  park  subtype  accounted  for  most  of  this  use.     The  only  other 
types  where  use  was  observed  during  this  winter  were  the  ponderosa  pine- 
grassland  and  sagebrush-grassland  types   (Table  14).     This  was  the  only 
season  when  elk  were  not  observed  in  the  agricultural   type. 

Relation   to  Timber 

More  than  half  the  elk  observed  occurred  within  0-100  feet  of  the 
nearest  stand  of  timber  during  all   seasons   (Table  15).     The  greatest  use 
within  this  class  occurred  during  winter,  when  it  accounted  for  83  percent 


•28- 


c 


Table  14.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetation  types  by  elk  as  determined  from  1426  observations  during  the 
report  period. 


Season 


Vegetation  Type 


Grassland  Type: 

Grassland  Park  Subtype 
Drainageway  Subtype 
Burn  Subtype     

TOTAL 


Spring  1975 
(372)1/ 


592/ 
tr3/ 


Summer  1975 
(372) 


21 
8 


Fall    1975 
(375) 


29 
10 


Winter  1975-76 
(307) 


65 
1 


Agricultural 
Cropland 
Hay  Meadow 


Type: 


59 


3 
5 


29 


13 

29 


39 


24 
9 


66 


TOTAL 


42 


33 


i 

o 
i 


Sagebrush-Grassland  Type: 
Silver  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype  12 

Big  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype  tr 


TOTAL 


12 


12 


12 


Deciduous   Shrub  Type: 
Skunkbush-Grassland  Subtype 
Snowberry  Subtype 


TOTAL 


Ponderosa  Pine-Grassland  Type: 
Ponderosa  Pine-Bunchgrass  Subtype 
Ponderosa  Pine-Juniper  Subtype 


18 


27 


21 


21 
1 


TOTAL 


Ponderosa  Pine  Type: 


18 


27 

1 


21 


22 


V  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 

2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 

3/  Trace  -  a  value  less  than  1  percent  of  seasonal  observations, 


of  the  observations.     A  greater  proportion  of  seasonal   elk  observations 
occurred  in  the  300-600  and  600  feet  plus  classes  during  fall   than 
during  other  seasons.     This  was  perhaps  related  to  use  by  elk  of  large 
open  areas  such  as  the  agricultural   type.     This  trend  was  similar  to 
that  observed  during  the  previous  year  (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 


Table  15.     Occurrence  of  elk  at  various  distances  from  the  nearest  stand 
of  timber  as  determined  from  1426  observations  during  the 
report  period. 


Distance  Class 

Spring  1975 
(372)1/ 

Summer 
(372) 

1975 

Fall    1975 
(375) 

Winter  1975-76 
(307) 

0-100  ft. 

512/ 

55 

63 

83 

100-300  ft. 

40 

33 

14 

16 

300-600  ft. 

8 

1 

13 

- 

Over  600  ft. 

1 

- 

10 

1 

]J  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal   observations. 


Use  of  Slopes 

Seasonal  use  by  elk  of  six  classes  of  topographical  features  appears 
in  Table  16.  More  than  50  percent  of  the  elk  observations  occurred  on 
flatlands  during  all  seasons,  but  the  greatest  yearlong  use  occurred 
during  fall  (Table  17).  This  was  influenced  largely  by  use  of  plateaus, 
coulees  and  creek  bottoms  which  was  apparently  related  to  use  by  elk  of 
the  agricultural  type.  Plateaus  received  considerable  use  during  all 
seasons  except  winter,  but  the  heaviest  use  occurred  there  during  fall 
(Table  16).  Creek  bottoms  received  their  only  significant  use  during  fall. 
Coulee  bottoms  received  their  greatest  use  during  spring  and  summer, 
while  ridges  were  most  important  during  winter.  This  was  similar  to  the 
trend  of  the  previous  year  (Dusek  and  McCann  1975). 

Gentle  slopes  received  the  greatest  use  of  all  three  classes  throughout 
the  report  period  with  the  greatest  use  occurring  during  spring  and  winter 
(Table  17).  The  only  use  observed  on  steep  slopes  occurred  during  summer. 
Sidehills  received  greater  use  than  coulee  heads  during  all  seasons,  although 
their  greatest  use  occurred  during  spring  and  winter.  Coulee  heads  received 
their  greatest  use  during  summer  and  fall. 


J 


^J 


-30- 


Sl^^^ 


Table  16.  Seasonal  use  of  various  topographical  features  by  elk  as 

determined  from  1426  observations  during  the  report  period. 


Season 


Spring  1975  (372)1/ 
Summer  1975  (372) 
Fall  1975  (375) 
Winter  1975-76  (307) 


Topographical  Features 


Coulee 

Creek 

Coulee 

Sidehill 

Bottom 

Bottom 

Ridge 

Plateau 

Head 

322/ 

40 

_ 

6 

15 

7 

29 

35 

3 

2 

19 

11 

20 

18 

14 

8 

26 

13 

44 

24 

- 

24 

5 

3 

w 


]_/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


Table  17.  Seasonal  use  of  gradients  by  elk  during  the  report  period. 


Spring  1975 

Summer 

1975 

Fall    1975 

Winter  1975-76 

Gradient 

(372)1/ 

(372) 

(375) 

(307) 

Flat2./ 

611/ 

60 

67 

53 

Gentle  (0-15°) 

36 

27 

24 

35 

Medium  (16-30°) 

3 

10 

10 

n 

Steep  (31-45°) 

- 

3 

- 

- 

1/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 

2/  Includes  coulee  bottoms,  creek  bottoms,  ridges  and  plateaus. 

3/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations 


Use  of  Exposures 

During  winter  1975-76,  86  percent  of  elk  observations  associated  with 
some  degree  of  slope  occurred  on  southerly  exposures  (Table  18).  Those 
exposures  also  received  most  of  the  observed  use  during  spring  and  fall. 
During  summer,  northerly  exposures  received  65  percent  of  the  observed  use. 


•31- 


Table  18.  Seasonal  use  of  each  of  eight  exposures  by  elk  as  determined 
from  568  observations  during  the  report  period. 


Season 

North 

East 

South 

West 

NE 

NW 

SE 

SW 

Spring  1975 
(141)1/ 

32/ 

13 

35 

8 

7 

- 

24 

10 

Summer  1975 
(158) 

24 

2 

5 

3 

21 

20 

17 

8 

Fall  1975 
(125) 

11 

9 

51 

- 

12 

- 

17 

- 

Winter  1975- 
(144) 

76 

3 

3 

45 

6 

2 

- 

13 

28 

J 


y  Sample  size  occurring  on  some  degree  of  slope  during  a  respective 

season. 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal   observations  associated  with  some  degree  of  slope. 


Fall   Food  Habits 

Food  habits  of  elk  during  October  and  November  1975  were  determined 
by  analysis  of  four  rumen  samples:     three  from  hunter-killed  elk  in  the 
Hawk  and  Fattig  Creek  drainages  and  one  from  an  animal   killed  illegally 
in  Halfbreed  Creek. 

Grasses,  browse  and  forbs  accounted  for  61,  25  and  11   percent,  by 
volume,  of  the  four  rumens   (Table  19).     Most  grass  material   in  the  rumens 
was  not  identifiable,  but  wheat  (Triticwv  sppj   accounted  for  most  of  that 
which  was.     Wheat  and  western  wheatgrass   (Agropyron  smithii)     constituted 
22  and  4  percent  of  the  diet,   respectively. 

Snowberry  occurred  in  all   four  samples  and  accounted  for  18  percent 
of  the  seasonal    diet.     Other  important  browse  included  silver  sagebrush, 
wild  rose  and  rubber  rabbi tbrush   (Chrysothamnus  nauseosus) .      Ponderosa 
pine  (Pinus  ponderosa)    in  the  diet  during  fall   consisted  of  dried  needles, 
perhaps  picked  up  incidentally  while  elk  were  feeding  on  other  plants. 
Important  forbs   included  cud-leaf  sagewort  (Artemisia  ludoviciana)   and 
fringed  sagewort  (A.   frigida) . 

Population  Characteristics 

Calfrcow  ratios  for  summer  and  fall    1975  were  53:100  and  52:100, 
respectively.     The  same  ratio  was  55:100  during  winter  1975-76  (Table  20). 


*J 


■32- 


Table  19.  Fall  food  habits  of  elk  as  determined  from  examination  of 
rumen  contents  of  four  elk. 


Taxa 


Browse: 

Artemisia  aana 
Chrysothamnus  nauseosus 
Pinus  ponderosa 
Rhus    tvi loba ta 
Rosa   spp. 

Symphoricarpos   spp. 
Unidentified  Browse 


Oct. -Nov.  1975 
4  rumens 


75/  31/ 
25/  1 
75/  2 
25/trl/ 
50/  1 
100/18 
75/ tr 


Total  Browse 


100/25 


^ 


Forbs : 

Artemisia  frigida 
Artemisia   ludovioiana 
Aster   spp. 
Tragopogon  dubius 
Yucca  glauca 
Unidentified  Forbs 


Total   Forbs 


75/  1 
25/  2 
50/tr 
25/tr 
25/tr 
100/  8 


100/11 


Grasses: 

Agropyron  smithii 
Andropogon  scopavious 
Koeleria  cristata 
Triticum  spp. 
Unidentified  Grass 


50/  4 
25/tr 
25/tr 
75/22 
100/35 


Total   Grass 


100/61 


1/  Frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  rumens) /percent  of  diet. 
2/   tr  -  trace  (a  value  less  than   .5  percent). 


"Spike"  bulls  were  observed  with  cow/ calf  groups  throughout  summer  and 
fall    1975,  but  older  bulls  were  rarely  observed  with  these  groups  except 
during  fall.     For  this   reason,   the  calf:adult  ratio  of  37:100,   calculated 
for  fall   observations,  was  perhaps  the  most  accurate.     The  ratio  of 
older  bulls:cow,  which  was  21:100,  was  also  most  accurate  during  fall 
(Table  20). 


-33- 


r 

CO 

l 


Table  20.  Population  characteristics  of  elk  as  determined  from  938  observations  during  summer 
and  fall  1975  and  winter  1975-76. 


Unci.  Calves:         Older 

"Spike"  Older  Sex  &       Calves:   100    Spikes:   Bulls: 

Season Cows  Bulls  Bulls  Total  Calves  Age    Total  100  Cows  Adults  100  Cows  100  Cows 


Summer  1975 
(Jul. -Aug.) 

144 

27 

9 

180 

76 

- 

256 

53 

42 

19 

6 

Fall    1975 
(Sept. -Nov.) 

176 

30 

37 

243 

91 

41 

375 

52 

37 

17 

21 

Winter  1975-76 
(Dec. -Feb. ) 

175 

11 

2 

188 

% 

23 

307 

55 

51 

6 

1 

( 


'   '  '•   ;'.- 


The  annual  increment,  calculated  from  fall  observations,  was  27  percent. 
Production  data  during  this  report  period  were  similar  to  that  of  the 
past  2  years  (Dusek  and  McCann  1974  and  1975). 

Various  observability  bias'  precluded  an  estimate  of  a  total 
elk  population  by  direct  count.  An  estimate  of  the  cow  segment  (yearlings 
and  older)  was  computed  from  ratios  of  marked  to  unmarked  cows.  This 
was  accomplished  by  use  of  a  modified  Lincoln  Index  ( Marti nka  1969)  as 
f ol 1 ows : 

PE  =  M/PM 

where  PE  is  the  estimated  cow  population,  M  is  the  number  of  marked 
cows  present,  and  PM  is  the  percent  of  the  cows  that  were  marked.     A 
total   population  was  estimated  from  this,  as  well  as  summer  calf:cow 
and  "spike":cow  ratios  and  fall  older  bull:cow  ratio. 

All  seven  marked  cows  were  observed  during  the  summer- fall   period 
during  1975.     The  estimated  cow  segment  was  67  animals.     From  this  the 
estimated  numbers  of  calves,   "spike"  bulls,  and  older  bulls  were  36, 
13  and  14,  respectively.     Thus,  the  estimated  population  of  elk  in  the 
Bull  Mountains  during  the  summer- fall   period  of  1975  was  130  animals. 


-35- 


J 


Turkeys 

Merriam's  turkeys  (Meleagvis  gallopavo  merriami)   were  introduced 
in  the  Bull  Mountains  in  1958  using  wild  trapped  stock  from  the  Long 
Pines  area  of  southeastern  Montana  (Greene  and  Ellis  1971).  Annual 
fall  hunting  seasons  for  turkeys  in  the  Bull  Mountains  were  initiated 
in  1962.  The  area  has  subsequently  provided  the  greatest  turkey 
hunting  potential  in  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  administrative  region  5 
in  terms  of  numbers  of  hunters  afield  and  birds  harvested  (Compton  1975). 

Distribution  and  Range  Use 

The  following  analysis  resulted  from  712  observations  of  turkeys 
during  the  report  period,  including  326  and  386  ground  and  aerial  ob- 
servations, respectively.  Trends  in  range  use  were  similar  to  those 
of  previous  years  (Dusek  and  McCann  1973,  1974  and  1975)  unless  other- 
wise noted.  Most  of  the  observations  during  the  report  period  occurred 
in  southern  Musselshell  County. 

Flocking  Characteristics 

Gobbler  flocks  were  prevalent  throughout  the  year,  but  were 
largest  in  number  during  spring  and  winter  (Table  21).  Flocks  con- 
sisting only  of  hens  were  rarely  observed.  Hens  were  generally  associated 
with  some  other  type  of  flock. 

During  April,  mixed  flocks  gave  way  to  courtship  flocks  consisting 
of  several  displaying  males  accompanied  by  hens  and  averaging  4.2  birds/ 
flock.  Brood  flocks,  consisting  of  one  to  three  hens  with  poults, 
were  observed  during  summer  and  fall.  The  mixed  flocks  observed  during 
late  fall  and  winter  perhaps  resulted  from  aggregation  of  brood  flocks 
during  fall. 

Use  of  Vegetation  Types 

Spring:     The  grassland  type,  which  accounted  for  57  percent  of 
observations,   received  the  greatest  use  during  spring  1975.     The  grass- 
land park  and  drainageway  subtypes  received  considerable  use  during 
this  season   (Table  22).     The  ponderosa  pine-grassland  type  also  received 
considerable  use  during  spring.     The  agricultural   type  received  only 
minor  use  which  was   in  contrast  to  other  years. 

Summer:     As  during  spring,   the  grassland  type  received  the  greatest 
seasonal    use  accounting  for  59  percent  of  the  observations.     Nearly  all 
of  this  occurred  in  the  grassland  park  subtype  (Table  22).     The  ponderosa 
pine-grassland  and  agricultural    types  were  also  important  during  summer. 

Fall :     Use  of  the  grassland  type  decreased  slightly  from  summer, 
but  still    received  the  greatest  seasonal   usage  (Table  22).     Use  of  the 
drainageway  subtype  increased  from  summer.     The  agricultural   type 
accounted  for  45  percent  of  fall   observations,  representing  a  marked 
increase  over  summer.     Most  of  this  usage  occurred  in  the  cropland  subtype. 


-36- 


c 


r 


i 

J 


Table  21.     Seasonal   flocking  characteristics  of  turkeys  based  on  712  observations  during  the  report 
period. 


Spring  1975  (121)1/     Sumner  1975  (114) 
No.       Fl         Avg.  No.       Fl .       Avg. 


1 

No. 

Fl. 

Avg. 

Gobbler 

75 

11 

6.8 

Hen 

2 

1 

2.0 

Brood 

- 

- 

„ 

Mixed 

35 

3 

11.7 

Courtship 

25 

6 

4.2 

80         17        4.7 


32 


1/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 


Fall   1975  (220) 
No.       Fl.       Ave 

67        12        5.6 


4        8.0  II 


53 


7       14.3 
2       26.5 


Winter  1975-76     (241) 
No.       Fl.       Avg. 


71 
21 

149 


11 
2 


6.5 
10.5 


8      18.6 


Table  22.     Seasonal    use  of  vegetation   types  by  turkeys   as  determined  from  712  observations  during 
the  report  period. 


Vegetation  Type 


Grassland  Type: 
Grassland  Park  Subtype 
Drainageway  Subtype 
Burn  Subtype 


Spring  1975 
(137)1/ 


371/ 
20 


Summer  1975 
(114) 


58 

1 


Fall    1975 
(220) 


31 
20 


Winter  1975-75 
(241) 


2 
1 


TOTAL 


57 


59 


51 


CO 

co 
I 


Agricultural 
Cropland 

Hay  Meadows 


Type 


4 
2 


TOTAL 

Sagebrush-Grassland  Type: 
Silver  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype 
Big  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype 


TOTAL 


13 

4 


17 
4 


4 


42 
3 


45 


54 
17 


71 


Deciduous  Shrub  Type: 

Skunkbush  Subtype 

Snowberry  Subtype 


TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine-Grassland  Type: 
Ponderosa  Pine-Bunchgrass  Subtype 
Ponderosa  Pine-Juniper  Subtype 


31 
2 


TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine  Type: 
Feedlots  and  Farms: 


20 


18 


33 


20 


2 

2 


18 

7 


]J   Sample  size  for  a  respective  season 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


( 


I 


( 


c 


Table  21.  Seasonal  flocking  characteristics  of  turkeys  based  on  712  observations  during  the  report 
period. 


Spring  1975  (121)1/  Summer  1975  (114) 

No.       FT  ~    Avg. 


No. 
75 

Fl. 

11 

Avg. 

Gobbler 

6.8 

Hen 

2 

1 

2.0 

Brood 

- 

- 

-- 

Mixed 

35 

3 

11.7 

Courtship 

25 

6 

4.2 

32 


80         17        4.7 


8.0 


Fall  1975  (220)         Winter  1975-76     (241) 
No.       Fl.       Avg.  No.       Fl.       Avg. 


67        12         5.6 


100 
53 


7 

2 


14.3 
26.5 


71 
21 


2 


6.5 
10.5 


149  8       18.6 


i 


]J  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season. 


I 

co 
i 


Table  22.  Seasonal  use  of  vegetation  types 
the  report  period. 


by  turkeys  as  determined  from  712  observations  during 


Vegetation  Type 


Grassland  Type: 
Grassland  Park  Subtype 
Drainageway  Subtype 
Burn  Subtype 


TOTAL 

Agricultural   Type: 

Cropland 

Hay  Meadows 
TOTAL 


Spring  1975 
(137)1/ 


371/ 
20 


Sagebrush-Grassland  Type: 
Silver  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype 
Big  Sagebrush-Grassland  Subtype 


57 


4 
2 


Summer  1975 
(114) 


58 

1 


59 


13 

4 


17 


Fall    1975 
(220) 


31 
20 


51 


42 
3 


45 


Winter  1975-76 
(241) 


2 
1 


54 
17 


71 


TOTAL 


Deciduous  Shrub  Type: 

Skunkbush  Subtype 

Snowberry  Subtype 


TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine-Grassland  Type: 
Ponderosa  Pine-Bunchgrass  Subtype 
Ponderosa  Pine- Juniper  Subtype 


TOTAL 

Ponderosa  Pine  Type: 
Feedlots  and  Farms: 


31 
2 


33 


1/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season, 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


20 


20 


2 

2 


18 


18 

7 


( 


A 


L 


Winter:     During  winter  1975-76  the  agricultural   type  received  the 
greatest  use,  accounting  for  71   percent  of  the  observations.     This 
pattern  was  in  contrast  to  that  of  the  previous  winter  (Dusek  and 
McCann  1975)  when  most  of  the  observed  use  occurred  in  the  ponderosa 
pine-grassland  type.     Use  of  farmsteads  and  feedlots  by  turkeys  during 
winter  1975-76  was  minor  (Table  22). 


Relation  to  Timber 

During  spring,  summer  and  fall   of  1975,  two-thirds  or  more  of  the 
turkeys  observed  occurred  within  0-100  feet  of  the  nearest  stand  of 
timber  (Table  23).     All   observations  were  within  300  feet  of  the 
nearest  stand  of  timber  during  spring  and  summer.     Only  during  winter 
were  turkeys  observed  at  a  distance  from  timber  of  greater  than  600 
feet.     Throughout  the  report  period  the  proportion  of  turkeys  observed 
at  distances  greater  than  100  feet  increased  as  use  of  the  agricultural 
type  increased. 

Use  of  Slopes 

Seasonal  use  by  turkeys  of  the  six  classes  of  topographical 
features  appears  in  Table  24.  More  than  75  percent  of  the  observations 
occurred  on  flatlands  during  all  seasons  except  summer  (Table  25). 
Coulee  bottoms  and  plateaus  accounted  for  the  greatest  use  of  flatlands 
during  spring  and  fall,  while  creek  bottoms  received  the  heaviest  use 
during  winter.  The  greatest  use  of  sidehills  by  turkeys  occurred 
during  summer.  Turkeys  were  not  observed  on  steep  slopes  during  the 
report  period. 


Fall  Foods 

Turkeys  are  omnivorous  feeders  and  demonstrate  distinct  food  pref- 
erences  (Edminster  1954).     Animal   foods  eaten  by  turkeys  include  a  variety 
of  arthropods,  while  plant  material   includes  mainly  fruits  and  seeds  with 
some  minor  use  of  leaves   (Martin  et  at.    1951). 

Crop  contents  were  examined  from  two  turkeys  killed  by  hunters  during 
fall   1975  (Table  26).     The  most  abundant  item  used  was  barley  seeds 
(Eovdeum  vulgar <e) ,  but  occurred  in  only  one  sample.     Seeds  from  prairie 
coneflower  (Ratibida  oolwmifera)  were  abundant  in  both  samples.     Fruits 
from  shrubs  included  those  from  wild  rose,  skunkbush  sumac  (Rhus  trilobata) 
and  snowberry.     Animal  matter  in  the  diet  consisted  of  insects  and  in- 
cluded grasshoppers  (Orthoptera)   and  beetles   (Coleoptera).     These  findings 
are  similar  to  those  of  Jonas   (1966)   in  the  Long  Pines.     The  absence  of 
ponderosa  pine  seeds  in  the  two  crops  may  indicate  poor  pine  mast  produc- 
tion  in  the  Bull  Mountains  during  1975,  since  that  item,  when  available, 
was  found  to  be  preferred  by  turkeys  during  the  study  in  the  Long  Pines. 
This  might  explain  the  heavy  use  of  the  agricultural   type  during  fall 
and  winter  of  this  report  period. 


•39- 


Table  23.  Occurrence  of  turkeys  at  various  distances  from  the  nearest 
stand  of  timber  as  determined  from  712  observations  during 
the  report  period. 


Spring  1975 

Summer  1975 

Fall   1975 

Winter  1975-76 

Distance  Class 

(137)1/ 
642/ 

(114) 

(220) 
70 

(241) 

0-100  ft. 

81 

38 

100-300  ft. 

36 

19 

28 

32 

300-600  ft. 

- 

- 

2 

20 

Over  600  ft. 

- 

- 

- 

11 

1/  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season, 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations 


Table  24.  Seasonal  use  of  the  various  topographical  features  by  turkeys 
as  determined  from  712  observations  during  the  report  period. 


Coulee 

Creek 

Coulee 

Season 

Sideh- 

n 

Bottom 

Bottom 

Ridge 

Plateau     Head 

Spring  1975  (137)1/ 

11 2/ 

36 

« 

10 

30              13 

Summer  1975  (114) 

34 

9 

n 

12 

23              11 

Fall    1975   (220) 

10 

46 

2 

- 

42 

Winter  1975-76  (241) 

20 

11 

39 

2 

28 

\^ 


y  Sample  size  for  a  respective  season, 
2/  Percent  of  seasonal  observations. 


Table  25.     Seasonal   use  of  gradients  by  turkeys  during  the  report 
period. 


Spring  1975  Summer  1975       Fall    1975       Winter  1975-76 

Gradient (137)1/  (114)                    (220) (220) 

Flat?/                       761/  55                         go                     80 

Gentle  (0-15°)       24  39                           2                     17 

Medium  (16-30°)       -  5                           8                       3 
Steep  (31-450)         - 


1/ 

Sample  size  for  a   respective  season. 

2/ 

Includes  coulee  and  creek  bottoms,   ridges  and  plateaus. 

3/ 

Percent  of  seasonal   observations. 

■40- 


w 


t 


Table  26.  Fall  foods  of  turkeys  as  determined  from  analysis  of  crops 
from  two  hunter-killed  turkeys. 


October  1975 
Taxa 2  Crops 

Shrubs:  , 

Rhus   trilobata  50/  41/ 

Rosa   spp.  50/  9 

Symphorioarpos   spp.  100/  2 

Total  Shrubs  100/15 

Forbs: 

Carnelina  dentata  50/   1 

Ratibida  eolwmifeva  100/17 

Tragopogon  dubius  50/   2 

Total   Forbs  100/20 

Grasses: 

Hordeum  vulgave  50/43 

Unidentified  Grasses  50/  1 

Total  Grasses  50/44 

Insects: 

Orthoptera  50/15 

Coleoptera  50/  4 

Total  Insects  50/19 


1/  Frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  crop  samples )/Percent  of  diet. 


Population  Characteristics 

Twenty- three  broods,  including  108  poults,  were  observed  from 
August  through  early  October  1975.  The  average  brood  size,  or  poults/ 
adult  hen,  was  4.7  (Table  27).  The  number  of  poults/adult  was  .8. 
Except  during  winter,  the  number  of  males  occurring  in  seasonal  observa- 
tions exceeded  females.  For  this  reason  the  poult: adult  ratio  may  have 
been  underestimated. 


Table  27 

Population  characteristics  of  turkeys 
August-October  based  on  251   observatii 

during  the  period 
)ns. 

Period 
Covered 

August- 
October 

No.           No.         Avg.Br.     Adults 
Broods     Young     Size       M       F       Total 

1975     23           108         4.7     120     23       143 

Young:         Young: 
Adult  F.     Adult 

4.7               .8 

•41- 


Other  Game  Species 

Antelope 

Only  during  spring  and  summer  were  antelope  ( Antilocapra  amerioana) 
distributed  throughout  the  entire  study  area.  During  fall  and  winter 
they  occurred  primarily  in  portions  of  the  study  area  lying  in  northern 
Yellowstone  County  and  at  the  west  end  of  southern  Musselshell  County  in 
the  vicinity  of  Dewey  Creek.  Such  areas  are  characterized  by  extensive 
stands  of  big  sagebrush-grassland  whereas  big  sagebrush  is  rare  throughout 
much  of  southern  Musselshell  County.  Results  from  studies  in  central  and 
southeastern  Montana  indicated  big  sagebrush  to  be  the  mainstay  of  the 
winter  diet  of  antelope  (Bayless  1969  and  Freeman  1971). 

Portions  of  hunting  districts  540  and  550  occur  within  the  study 
area.  During  July  1975,  121  antelope  were  classified  in  hunting  district 
540.  Fawn:doe  and  fawn:adult  ratios  were  23:100  and  19:100,  respectively, 
and  compared  closely  with  those  from  the  previous  year  (Dusek  and  McCann 
1975). 

White- tailed  Deer 

White- tailed  deer  (Odocoileus  vivginiana)   were  observed  primarily  in 
the  deciduous  tree/shrub  and  agricultural  areas  associated  with  the 
Musselshell  River  floodplain  which  is  typical  of  whitetail  habitat  in 
eastern  Montana  (Allen  1971).  They  were  occasionally  observed  in  the 
Bull  Mountains  ecosystem  just  adjacent  to  the  floodplain.  Several  sightings 
were  also  made  in  a  portion  of  the  Hawk  Creek  drainage  approximately  20 
miles  south  of  the  river.  Observations  of  white-tailed  deer  in  the  study 
area  were  not  numerous  enough  to  provide  meaningful  range  use  and  popula- 
tion data. 

Sharp-tailed  Grouse 

Sharp- tailed  grouse  (Pedioeoetes  phasianellus)   were  rarely  sighted 
in  the  Bull  Mountains  during  the  report  period,  or,  for  that  matter,  since 
initiation  of  the  study.  Optimum  sharptail  habitat  includes  open  and 
brushy  areas  and  not  the  forest  proper  (Edminster  Op.  ait.).     The  absence 
of  a  deciduous  tree/shrub  habitat  type  in  the  Bull  Mountains  may  serve 
as  a  limiting  factor.   Intensive  grazing  may  also  be  limiting,  since 
standing  grasses  provide  shelter  and  night  roosting  sites  for  sharptails 
(Brown  1971). 

Revegetation  Studies 

The  purpose  of  this  phase  was  to  monitor  development  of  vegetational 
cover  on  areas  that  were  recently  mined,  graded  and  reseeded  to  assess 
their  value  as  wildlife  habitat.  Included  are  two  areas:  Consol 's  test 
pit  and  the  Square  Deal  Mine  (Figure  1).  The  two  areas  affect  12  and  7 
acres,  respectively. 


-42- 


c 


Consol 's  Test  Pit 

Mining  and  grading  of  the  site  (Figure  9)  were  completed  during  1971 
and  the  entire  area  was  seeded  during  May  1972.  Approximately  half  of 
the  disturbed  area  was  reworked,  refertilized  and  reseeded  where  the 
initial  seeding  attempt  had  failed  (Consol  pers.  cornm.)  during  November 

1974.  This  included  the  entire  portion  of  the  south  spoils  ridge  covered 
with  shale,  the  level  portion  and  steep  south  exposure  of  the  north  spoils 
ridge  covered  with  the  sandstone-shale  mixture,  and  the  south  exposure 

of  the  north  spoils  ridge  covered  with  sandstone  (Figure  9).  The  steep 
slopes  were  mulched  with  straw  and  covered  with  netting.  Vegetational 
analysis  sites  affected  are  those  circled  in  Figure  9.  During  late  April 

1975,  2,500  ponderosa  pine  seedlings  were  planted  by  hand  on  the  reworked 
steep  slopes.  By  early  fall  1975  no  live  seedlings  were  observed. 


Vegetational  Analysis 

Vegetational  cover  was  evaluated  during  early  July  1975.  This  was 
facilitated  by  a  canopy  coverage  method  (Daubenmire  1959)  whereby  20  2x5 
decimeter  plots  were  sampled  along  a  100-foot  transect  line  at  each  of 
19  permanent  sites  (Figure  9).  Lines  were  placed  parallel  to  the  contour 
where  practicable  and  the  site  marker  was  used  as  a  midpoint.  Seven 
coverage  classes  were  used  to  estimate  the  percent  of  bare  ground,  litter 
and  canopy  coverage  of  vegetation  by  forage  class  and  species.  Unless 
otherwise  noted,  trends  observed  during  1975  were  similar  to  those  of 
previous  years  (Dusek  and  McCann  1973,  1974  and  1975). 

Soil  Mixture 

The  following  analysis  compares  data  by  soil  mixture,  regardless 
of  slope  or  exposure.  Data  for  1975  appear  in  Table  28. 

Topsoiled  portions  exhibited  the  greatest  canopy  of  grasses  and 
residual  vegetation  and  the  smallest  percentage  of  bare  ground  of  all 
soil  mixtures  (Table  28).  The  canopy  of  grasses  increased  on  all  soil 
mixtures  from  1974  to  1975,  but  the  greatest  increase  occurred  on  sand- 
stone-shale and  shale  portions.  This  was  attributed  to  the  reseeding  and 
mulching  work  done  during  fall  1974  on  those  sites. 

Crested  wheatgrass  (Agropyron  cristatwn)   was  by  far  the  most 
abundant  grass  on  both  topsoil  and  sandstone  sites,  but  the  greatest 
increase  in  canopy  from  1974  to  1975  occurred  on  topsoil.  Orchard  grass 
(Dactylis  glomerata)   and  ryegrass  (Lolium  multiflorum)   were  the  most 
abundant  grasses  on  sandstone-shale  sites,  whereas  smooth  brome  (Bromus 
inevmis)   was  the  most  abundant  on  shale  sites  (Table  28). 

Topsoil  sites  exhibited  the  least  canopy  of  forbs  of  all  soil 
mixtures  (Table  28)  which  was  in  contrast  to  data  from  previous  years. 
The  canopy  of  yellow  sweetclover  (Melilotus  officinalis)   increased  from 
1974  to  1975  on  all  soil  mixtures  and  accounted  for  the  bulk  of  the  forb 
canopy  on  topsoil  and  sandstone  sites.  Russian  thistle  (Salsola  kali) 


-43- 


Table  28.      Constancy,   canopy  coverage  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  various  types  of  soil   on  spoils  material   as 
determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter  plots  on  each 
of  19  sites  at  Consol's   test  pit. 


Soil 

Sandstone 

Topsoil 

Sandstone 

&  Shale 

Shale 

Taxa 

7  Sites 

7  Sites 

3  Sites 

2  Sites 

GRASSES: 

99-/ 

Agropyron  cristatum* 

100/63/ 

100/26/ 

74 

67/  8/ 

65 

100/  6/  22 

Agropyron  elongata* 

71/  3/ 

16 

100/  7/ 

36 

100/  2/ 

15 

50/  4/  22 

Agropyron  smith-Li* 

57/  1/ 

?!/ 

86/  1/ 

11 

100/  3/ 

38 

100/  1/  20 

Agropyron  spicatwn 

14/tr/ 

- 

- 

- 

Agropyron   s  pp .  * 

14/tr/ 

1 

100/  1/ 

16 

67/  5/ 

42 

100/  2/  75 

Bromus  inermis * 

100/16/ 

61 

100/14/ 

56 

100/  8/ 

58 

100/  9/  52 

Bromus   tec torum 

100/  8/ 

35 

100/10/ 

39 

100/  5/ 

35 

100/  3/  27 

Dactylis  glomerata* 

43/  4/ 

11 

86/  4/ 

26 

100/10/ 

52 

50/  1/  2 

Lolium  multiflorurn* 

14/tr/ 

1 

57/tr/ 

a 

67/  9/ 

38 

- 

Poa  eompressa* 

86/  1/ 

8 

43/tr/ 

4 

67/  1/ 

13 

100/  2/  15 

Sporobolis  airoides* 

- 

29/tr/ 

1 

33/tr/ 

3 

50/  1/  7 

Stipa  viridula* 

57/tr/ 

4 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

Triticum   spp. * 

- 

- 

33/  1/ 

12 

50/  2/  25 

Unidentified  Grasses 

14/tr/  1 
100/86/100 

29/tr/ 
100/55/ 

1 
99 

- 

- 

TOTAL  GRASSES 

100/45/ 

97 

100/25/  97 

FORBS : 

Achillea  millefolium 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

- 

Artemisia  frigida 

29/tr/ 

2 

- 

- 

- 

Artemisia   ludoviciana 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

As tragalus   S  pp . * 

43/tr/ 

2 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

Atriplex   spp.* 

14/  1/ 

1 

43/  1/ 

4 

33/  1/ 

7 

50/tr/  2 

CHENOPODIACEAE 

- 

- 

33/tr/ 

2 

- 

Cirsium  arvense 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

CMJCIFERAE 

29/  1/ 

6 

14/tr/ 

1 

67/tr/ 

7 

100/  1/  15 

Kochia  scoparia 

- 

29/tr/ 

2 

33/tr/ 

2 

100/36/  95 

Lactuca  serriola. 

14/tr/ 

1 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

50/  1/  7 

Me  li to tus  officinalis  * 

100/17/ 

86 

100/12/ 

69 

100/  7/ 

70 

100/  4/  55 

Salsola  kali 

- 

57/  8/ 

24 

67/13/ 

52 

100/15/  50 

Taraxicwn  officinale 

- 

43/tr/ 
100/22/ 

3 
84 

- 

- 

TOTAL  FORBS 

100/19/ 

91 

100/20/ 

80 

100/55/100 

TREES  AND  SHRUBS: 

Pinus  ponder osa[ 1 i  ve ) 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

33/tr/ 

2 

- 

Pinus  ponderosai dead) 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

Symphoricarpos   spp. 

43/tr/ 
43/tr/ 

2 
2 

- 

- 

- 

"  TOTAL  SHRUBS 

14/tr/ 

1 

33/tr/ 

2 

- 

Bare  Ground 

100/12/ 

74 

100/47/ 

96 

100/50/100 

100/34/  92 

Rock 

100/  4/ 

30 

100/24/ 

82 

100/15/ 

97 

100/  6/  77 

Lying  Litter 

100/69/ 

99 

100/33/ 

92 

100/25/100 

100/28/  67 

Standing  Litter 

86/26/ 

74 

100/20/ 

68 

33/  3/ 

22 

50/  1/  7 

\j     t-uiib  lchilj    v  1-"='  <-cii  l    ullui  [tiin-t    ainuiiy    i>  i  Le;>  j /  ucuiu|jy    Luvcr  ay1 

area  covered)/frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  plots). 
2/  tr  -  trace  (a  value  less  than   .5  percent). 
*  Included  in  the  seed  mixture  used  at  the  test  pit. 


-44- 


r 


c 


( 


I 


AREA: 

A SPOILS  RIDGES 

B PIT  AREA 

C HIGHWALL 


TRANSECT  LOCATION 
ELEVATION    IN   FEET 


SOILS: 

TOPSOIL  

SANDSTONE   

SANDSTONE-SHALE 
SHALE 


TION  COAL  COMPANY'S 
TEST  PIT 


Figure  9.      Map  of  Consol's   test  pit  showing   respective   areas,   soil   mixtures   and  location  of  19 
permanent  vegetational   analysis  sites. 


an  annual,  was  the  most  abundant  forb  on  sandstone-shale  sites.     On  shale 
sites,  where  forbs  were  the  dominant  forage  class,  summer  cypress   (Koohia 
saoparia)  was  the  most  abundant  forb,  followed  by  Russian  thistle. 
Saltbush   (Atriplex  sppj   occurred  on  more  sites  and  in  a  greater  percent 
of  the  plots  on  sandstone  and  sandstone-shale  than  on  other  soil  mixtures. 

Ponderosa  pine  seedlings  occurring  in  plots  on  sandstone  and  sandstone- 
shale  sites   resulted  from  the  planting  during  April   1975.     Snowberry,  a 
native  shrub,  occurred  only  on  topsoiled  sites. 


Gradient 

When  the  1975  data  were  evaluated  by  gradient,  regardless  of  soil 
mixture  or  exposure,  sites  varying  from  2.5:1  to  3:1  (medium)  exhibited 
the  greatest  canopy  of  grasses  and  residual  vegetation,  whereas  sites 
varying  from  1.25:1  to  2:1  (steep)  exhibited  the  lowest  (Table  29).  Crested 
wheatgrass  was  the  most  abundant  grass  on  all  classes  of  gradient,  followed 
by  smooth  brome.  Ryegrass  exhibited  a  decrease  in  canopy  on  steep  slopes 
from  1974  to  1975. 

Yellow  sweetclover  was  by  far  the  most  abundant  forb  on  medium  and 
nearly  level  gradients.  Russian  thistle  and  summer  cypress,  both  annuals, 
were  the  most  abundant  forbs  on  steep  slopes.  Saltbush  was  abundant  on 
medium  slopes. 


Exposure 

Slopes  having  a  northerly  exposure  exhibited  a  greater  canopy  of 
grasses  and  residual  vegetation  and  a  lesser  canopy  of  forbs  than  did 
southerly  exposures  (Table  30).  Both  yellow  sweetclover  and  Russian  thistle 
were  more  abundant  on  southerly  exposures  than  on  northerly  exposures.  All 
of  this  perhaps  reflects  more  xeric  conditions  on  southerly  exposures 
resulting  from  longer  periods  of  direct  sunlight  throughout  the  year. 

Use  by  Wildlife 

Mule  deer  were  the  only  game  species  known  to  have  used  the  disturbed 
site  to  any  extent  since  it  was  seeded  during  1972.  Deer  were  not  actually 
observed  within  the  enclosure  during  the  report  period,  although  tracks  and 
pellet  groups  indicated  their  presence.  Yellow  sweetclover,  an  important 
item  in  the  summer  diet  of  deer,  was  abundant  on  the  site  during  summer  1975, 
although  not  as  abundant  as  it  was  during  summer  1973.  During  winter  1975-76, 
saltbushes  which  occurred  primarily  on  sandstone  and  sandstone-shale  sites 
appeared  to  be  the  major  item  on  the  disturbed  site  used  by  mule  deer. 
Nearly  all  the  annual  leader  growth  was  utilized  on  some  plants.  During 
late  January  and  February  1976  there  was  no  evidence  of  deer  using  the  site 
following  fresh  snowfall,  suggesting  that  the  area  may  not  have  been  used 
by  deer  during  late  winter.  Little  or  no  evidence  of  deer  was  observed  on 
topsoiled  sites. 


W 


-46- 


^ 


Table  29.     Constancy,  canopy  coverage,  and  frequency  of  low-growing 

vegetation  on  various  classes  of  gradient  on  spoils  material 
as  determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter  plots  on 
each  of  19  sites  at  Consol 's  test  pit. 


Slope 

1 .25:1-2 

!:1 

2.5:1-3: 

1 

Nearly  Level 

Taxa 

6  Site< 

7  Sites 

6  Sites 

GRASSES: 

Agropyron  cristatum* 

83/14/ 

481/ 

100/47/ 

90 

100/41/  77 

Agropyron  elongata* 

83/  2/ 

19 

71/  6/ 

31 

100/  5/  20 

Agropyron  srnithii* 

100/  1/ 

20 

57/  1/ 

6 

83/  2/  23 

Agropyron  spicatum 

17/tr/ 

\U 

- 

- 

Agropyron   spp.  * 

67/  3/ 

26 

71/  1/ 

9 

50/  1/  14 

Bromus  inermis* 

100/10/ 

53 

100/19/ 

66 

100/  9/  53 

Bromus   teotorvm 

100/  11 

50 

100/12/ 

38 

100/  3/  18 

Dactylis  glomerata* 

100/  6/ 

33 

43/tr/ 

4 

67/  8/  33 

Lolium  multiflorwn* 

67/  3/ 

12 

14/tr/ 

1 

33/  1/  12 

Poa  compressa* 

67/  1/ 

10 

57/tr/ 

4 

83/  1/  11 

Sporobolis  airoides* 

33/  1/ 

4 

14/tr/ 

1 

17/tr/  1 

Stipa  viridula* 

- 

43/tr/ 

2 

33/ tr/  2 

Triticum   spp. * 

33/  1/ 

14 

- 

- 

Unidentified  Grasses 

17/tr/ 

1 

29/tr/ 

1 

17/tr/  2 

TOTAL  GRASSES 

100/44/ 

96 

100/76/100 

100/62/100 

FORBS: 

Achillea  millefolium 

- 

- 

17/tr/  1 

Artemisia  frigida 

17/tr/ 

1 

- 

17/tr/  2 

Artemisia  lucoviciana 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

As traga lus   S  p p . * 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

50/  1/  2 

A  triplex   spp.* 

17/tr/ 

3 

43/  2/ 

4 

33/tr/  2 

CHENOPODIACEAE 

- 

- 

17/tr/  1 

Cirsium  arvense 

- 

14/tr/ 

1 

- 

CRUCIFERAE 

67/  1/ 

12 

14/tr/ 

1 

33/tr/  3 

Koohia  sooparia 

33/  9/ 

17 

- 

50/  4/  17 

Lactuca  serriola 

17/tr/ 

2 

29/tr/ 

1 

- 

Melilotus  officinalis* 

100/  6/ 

46 

100/15/ 

84 

100/16/  90 

Salsola  kali 

50/13/ 

35 

29/tr/ 

6 

50/  7/  28 

Taraxicum  officinale 

17/tr/ 
100/29/ 

1 
75 

29/tr/ 
100/18/ 

2 
91 

- 

TOTAL  FORBS 

100/26/  97 

TREES  AND  SHRUBS: 

Pinus  ponderosa   (live) 

33/ tr/ 

2 

- 

- 

Pinua  ponderosa   (dead) 

17/tr/ 

1 

- 

- 

Symphoricarpos   spp. 

- 

14/tr/ 
14/tr/ 

1 
1 

33/tr/  2 

TOTAL 

33/ tr/ 

2 

33/tr/  2 

Bare  Ground 

100/45/ 

97 

100/27/ 

82 

100/29/  85 

Rock 

100/21/ 

89 

100/14/ 

54 

100/  5/  45 

Lying  Litter 

100/30/ 

95 

100/54/ 

99 

100/47/  86 

Standing  Litter 

83/  6/ 

40 

86/25/ 

72 

67/20/  54 

]_/  Constancy  (percent  occurrence  among  sites)/canopy  coverage  (percent 

of  area  covered)/frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  plots) 
2/  tr  -  trace  (a  value  less  than   .5  percent). 
*  Included  in  the  seed  mixture  used  at  the  test  pit. 


-47- 


Table  30.     Constancy,   canopy  coverage,  and  frequency  of  low-growing 
vegetation  on  northerly  and  southerly  exposures  on  spoils 
material   as  determined  by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter 
plots  on  each  of  14  sites  at  Consol's  test  pit. 


_, 


Exposure 


Taxa 


GRASSES: 

Agropyron  oris  tectum* 
Agropyron  elongata* 
Agropyron  smithii* 
Agropyron  spicatum 
Agropyron  spp. 
Brornus  inermis  * 
Bromus  teotorum 
Dccc ty lis  glomevata* 
Lolium  multiflorum* 
Poa  compressa* 
Sporobolis  airoides* 
Stipa  viridula* 
Tritioum  Spp. * 
Unidentified  Grasses 
TOTAL  GRASSES 

FORBS: 

Achillea  millefolium 
Artemisia  frigida 
Artemisia  lueoviciana 
As traga lus   spp.* 
Atriplex   spp.  * 
CHENOPODIACEAE 
Cirsium  arvense 
CRUCIFERAE 
Kochia  scoparia 
Laetuaa  serriola 
Me  I  ilo  bus   officinalis  * 
Salsola  kali 
Taraxicwn  officinale 
TOTAL  FORBS 

TREES  AND  SHRUBS: 

Pinus  ponderosa  (live) 
Pinus  ponderosa  (dead) 
Symphoricarpos   spp. 

TOTAL  SHRUBS  AND  TREES 


Norther 

y 

Southerly 

8  Site; 

6  Sites 

100/34/ 

8ll/ 

83/30/  62 

75/  4/ 

22 

100/  5/  28 

75/   1/ 

12 

100/   1/   19 

- 

17/tr/     ll> 

50/   1/ 

13 

67/  3/   18 

100/17/ 

57 

100/11/  57 

100/14/ 

54 

100/   3/  29 

62/  6/ 

24 

100/  3/   18 

25/   3/ 

8 

50/ tr/     2 

87/  1/ 

9 

33/tr/     5 

25/tr/ 

3 

1 7/tr/     1 

25/ tr/ 

1 

17/tr/     1 

12/   1/ 

6 

17/   1/     6 

25/tr/ 

1 

17/tr/     1 

100/73/ 

99 

100/49/  97 

m. 

17/tr/     1 

- 

17/tr/     2 

25/tr/ 

1 

17/tr/     1 

12/tr/ 

2 

33/   1/     3 

12/tr/ 

1 

_ 

12/tr/ 

2 

50/  1/     9 

12/   11 

12 

17/tr/     2 

12/tr/ 

2 

17/tr/     1 

100/  9/ 

59 

100/15/  84 

12/  1/ 

2 

67/13/  40 

37/tr/ 

2 
76 

- 

100/18/ 

100/30/  98 

- 

33/tr/     2 

- 

17/tr/     1 

25/tr/ 

2 

- 

25/tr/   2 


33/tr/  2 


Bare  Ground  100/21/  82  100/48/  97 

Rock  100/14/  56  100/19/  87 

Lying  Litter  100/59/  97  100/30/  96 

Standing  Litter 100/27/  78  83/12/  52 

V  Constancy  (percent  occurrence  among  sites)/canopy  coverage  (percent 

of  area  covered)/frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  plots). 
2/  tr  -  trace  (a  value  less  than  .5  percent). 
*  Included  in  the  seed  mixture  used  at  test  pit. 


•48- 


Square  Deal  Mine 

This  site,  a  gentle  southerly  exposure,  was  seeded  during  the  late 
winter-early  spring  period  of  1974.  A  layer  of  topsoil  had  been  placed 
over  the  spoils  prior  to  seeding. 


Vegetational  Analysis 

Vegetational  cover  was  evaluated  during  July  1975  at  each  of  three 
permanent  sites:     one  at  the  bottom  of  the  slope,  one  at  mid-slope  and 
one  near  the  top.     Each  was  evaluated  by  a  canopy  coverage  method  des- 
cribed previously.     Data  from  the  three  sites  were  averaged  and  appear 
in  Table  31. 

Forbs  and  grasses  exhibited  a  canopy  of  58  and  46  percent,  res- 
pectively, during  1975.     The  canopy  of  both  forage  classes  more  than 
doubled  over  the  previous  year  (Table  31).     Yellow  sweetclover  was  by  far 
the  most  abundant  forb.     The  canopy  of  annual  forbs,  which  included 
Russian  thistle  as  well  as  other  members  of  the  goosefoot  family 
(CHENOPODIACEAE),  decreased  from  1974  to  1975.    Western  wheatgrass  and 
unidentified  wheatgrasses  showed  a  marked  increase  in  canopy  from  1974  to 
1975  (Table  31).     Both  green  needlegrass  (Stipa  viridula)  and  needle- 
and-thread  (S.  oomata)  occurred  in  plots  on  this  disturbed  site  for  the 
first  time  during  1975. 


/ 


■49- 


Table  31.  Constancy,  canopy  coverage  and  frequency  of  low-growing 

vegetation  on  a  gently  sloping  southeast  exposure  as  determined 

by  examination  of  20  2x5  decimeter  plots  on  each  of  three  sites 
at  the  Square  Deal  Mine. 


Taxa 


GRASSES: 

Agropyron  smithii 
Agropyron   spp. 
Stipa  comata 
Stipa  viridula 
TOTAL  GRASSES 


3  Topsoiled  Sites 


July  1974 


100/13/921/ 
100/10/  73 

100/20/100 


July  1975 


100/24/100 
100/14/  67 
67/  2/  7 
100/  3/  27 
100/46/100 


F0RBS: 

Atrip  lex  spp. 
CHEN0P0DIACEAE 
Kochia  sooparia 
Lappula  red.owsk.ii 
Mediaago  sativa 
Melilotus  officinalis 
Salsola  kali 
Unidentified  Forbs 
TOTAL   FORBS 

Bare  Ground 

Rock 

Lying  Litter 

Standing  Litter 


67/   1/  12 
100/  4/   17 

33/tr/     2 

33/  4/23 

100/   8/  77 

100/  9/  23 

67/tr/     5 

100/24/  98 

100/81/100 
100/  2/  12 


100/  5/  28 
67/  1/  7 
33/tr/     2£/ 


100/52/  93 
100/  3/  30 

100/58/100 

100/54/100 
100/  2/  22 
100/16/  97 
100/  5/  57 


]_/  Constancy  (percent  occurrence  among  sites)/canopy  coverage  (percent 

of  area  covered) /frequency  (percent  occurrence  among  plots). 
2/  tr  -  trace  (a  value  less  than   .5  percent). 


v 


■50- 


t 


V 


SUMMARY  AND  DISCUSSION 

1.     Seasonal   use  by  mule  deer  of  the  grassland  and  agricultural   types, 
combined,   varied  from  58  to  84  percent  throughout  the  report  period  with 
these  extremes  occurring  during  winter  and  fall,  respectively.     All   sub- 
types within  the  two  types   received  considerable  use.     The  ponderosa  pine- 
grassland  type  received  its  greatest  use  during  winter  and  summer  which 
was  confined  to  the  ponderosa  pine-bunchgrass  subtype  almost  exclusively. 
The  sagebrush-grassland  type  received  considerably  less  use  during  winter 
1975-76  than  during  previous  winters.     Differences   in  relative  use  of 
vegetation  types  between  years  appeared  related  to  climatological   differences 
Relative  use  of  the  various  topographical   features  appeared  related  to 
preferences  for  vegetation  types.     Since  most  observations  were  made  when 
deer  were  active  and  feeding,   it  was  assumed  that  these  seasonal   patterns 
were  related  to  changes  in  preference  for  forage. 

Mule  deer  fawn  production  has  been  comparatively  poor  since  the  study 
was  initiated  during  1972.     Production  during  this  report  period  was  no 
exception.     Evaluation  of  winter  browse  species  during  previous  years  did 
not  indicate  heavy  use  of  silver  sagebrush  and  skunkbush  sumac,   important 
winter  browse  species.     Rubber  rabbitbrush  showed  extremely  heavy  use  during 
the  past  3  years,  but  this  species   is  not  widely  distributed  in  the  Bull 
Mountains.     As  compared  to  elk,  mule  deer  have  rather  limited  mobility  and 
are  less  able  to  avoid  unfavorable  habitat  conditions.     This  may  partially 
explain  low  fawn  production. 


2.     The  grassland  type  received  considerable  use  by  elk  throughout  the 
report  period,   but  was  by  far  the  most  important  type  during  spring  and 
winter.     Except  during  fall,   the  grassland  park  subtype  accounted  for  nearly 
all  of  the  use  within  this  type.     The  agricultural   type  was  important 
during  summer  and  fall,  but  received  no  observed  use  during  winter.     The 
heavy  use  of  that  type  by  elk  during  summer  may  have  resulted  from  such 
areas  being  devoid  of  livestock  during  that  period.     The  ponderosa  pine- 
grassland  type  received  considerable  use  during  summer,   fall   and  winter. 
Over  90  percent  of  the  elk  observed  throughout  the  report  period,  except 
during  fall,  occurred  within  300  feet  of  the  nearest  stand  of  timber,  perhaps 


-51- 


reflecting  the  importance  of  timber  as  escape  cover.  As  with  mule  deer, 
the  relative  use  of  topographical  features  was  related  to  seasonal 
preferences  for  vegetation  types. 

Elk  exhibited  considerable  mobility,  moving  an  average  of  6  miles 
from  summer  to  winter  home  ranges.  Home  ranges  were  larger  during  winter 
than  during  summer.  Livestock  appeared  to  be  a  major  factor  influencing 
distribution  of  elk  within  their  seasonal  herd  ranges.  The  mobility  of 
cow  elk  perhaps  allowed  them  to  seek  out  the  most  favorable  habitat  con- 
ditions. Evaluation  of  fall  food  habits  suggested  that  elk  forage  among 
a  wider  range  of  vegetation  than  do  mule  deer.  The  major  difference  was 
reflected  by  the  greater  amount  of  grass  in  the  fall  diet  of  elk.  This 
would  perhaps  allow  elk  to  be  more  adaptive  in  their  feeding  habits  than 
deer.  This  mobility  and  adaptability  may  account  for  the  good  calf 
production  of  elk. 

3.  Over  50  percent  of  the  seasonal  use  of  vegetation  types  by 
turkeys  occurred  on  the  grassland  type  during  spring,  summer  and  fall 
of  this  report  period.  The  grassland  park  and  drainageway  subtypes 
accounted  for  all  of  the  use  in  that  type.  Use  of  the  agricultural  type 
increased  throughout  the  report  period  and  accounted  for  the  greatest  use 
among  types  during  winter  1975-76.  The  ponderosa  pine-grassland  received 
considerable  use  during  all  seasons  except  fall.  Except  during  winter, 
nearly  all  observations  of  turkeys  occurred  within  300  feet  of  the  nearest 
stand  of  timber,  reflecting  the  importance  of  timber  as  escape  cover. 
Seasonal  use  of  topographical  features  also  reflected  seasonal  preferences 
for  vegetation  types. 

4.  The  study  area  provided  primarily  spring  and  summer  habitat  for 
antelope.  During  winter  antelope  were  observed  on  the  margins  of  the  study 
area  where  big  sagebrush  was  abundant. 

The  Bull  Mountains  ecosystem  appeared  to  provide  only  marginal  habitat 
for  white-tailed  deer  and  sharp- tailed  grouse.  One  important  limiting 
factor  may  be  the  lack  of  suitable  deciduous  tree/shrub  cover  in  the 
drainages. 

5.  During  1975  at  Consol's  test  pit,  grasses  exhibited  an  increase 
in  canopy  over  previous  years,  with  crested  wheatgrass  showing  the  most 
marked  increase,  followed  by  smooth  brome.  The  forb  cover  appeared  inversely 
related  to  that  of  grasses  when  data  were  evaluated  by  soil  mixture, 
gradient  and  exposure.  The  canopy  of  yellow  sweetclover  increased  from 

1974  but  did  not  occur  in  the  abundance  observed  during  1973,  especially 
on  topsoiled  sites.  As  the  canopy  of  grasses  continues  to  increase  while 
that  of  forbs  decreases,  the  habitat  value,  as  it  concerns  mule  deer,  will 
perhaps  decrease  also.  Systematic  grazing  by  livestock  may  reverse  this 
trend. 

6.  At  the  square  Deal  Mine,  forbs  were  the  most  abundant  forage 
class  during  1975.  Yellow  sweetclover  was  the  most  abundant  forb  as  well 
as  the  most  abundant  single  species  on  the  disturbed  area.  The  relative 


-52- 


c 


abundance  of  grasses  and  forbs  during  1975  was  similar  to  that  exhibited 
on  topsoiled  portions  of  Consol's  test  pit  during  summer  1973.  The  two 
summers  represented  the  second  growing  season  following  seeding  on  the 
respective  areas.  Western  wheatgrass  and  green  needlegrass,  important 
range  grasses  in  the  Bull  Mountains,  were  more  abundant  at  the  Square 
Deal  Mine  during  summer  1975  than  they  were  at  Consol's  test  pit  during 
summer  1973.  Crested  wheatgrass  was  not  used  in  the  seed  mixture  at  the 
Square  Deal  Mine. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Allen,  E.  1971.  White-tailed  deer.  Game  management  in  Montana.  Mussehl 
and  Howell,  ed.  Mont.  Dept.  of  Fish  &  Game.  pp.  69-79. 

Bayless,  S.  R.  1969.  Winter  food  habits,  range  use  and  home  range  of 
antelope  in  Montana.  J.  Wildl.  Manage.  33(3) :538-551. 

Brown,  R.  L.  Sharptailed  grouse.  Game  management  in  Montana.  Mussehl  and 
Howell,  ed.  Mont.  Dept.  of  Fish  &  Game.  pp.  129-133. 

Compton,  H.  0.  1975.  Upland  game  bird  survey  and  inventory,  Region  5. 
Prog.  rept.  No.  W-130-R-6,  Job  No.  1 1-5.  22  pp. 

Dasman,  R.  F.  and  R.  D.  Taber.  1956.  Behavior  of  Columbian  black-tailed 
deer  with  reference  to  population  ecology.  J.  Mamm.  37(2) : 1 43-1 64. 

Daubenmire,  R.  F.  1959.  A  canopy  coverage  method  of  vegetational 
analysis.  N.  W.  Sci.  33(l):43-64. 

Dice,  L.  R.  1952.  Natural  communities.  Univ.  Mich.  Press,  Ann  Arbor. 
547  pp. 

Dusek,  G.  L.  and  S.  A.  McCann.  1973.  Bull  Mountains  coal  field  study. 
Mont.  Dept.  of  Fish  &  Game  &  Consolidation  Coal  Co.,  Prog.  rept. 
53  pp. 

1974.  Bull  Mountains  coal  field  study.  Mont.  Dept.  of  Fish 


&  Game  &  Consolidation  Coal  Co.,  Prog.  rept.  76  pp. 

1975.  Bull  Mountains  coal  field  study.  Mont.  Dept.  of  Fish 


&  Game  &  Consolidation  Coal  Co.,  Prog.  rept.  85  pp. 

Edminster,  F.  C.  1954.  American  game  birds  of  field  and  forest.  Castle 
Books,  New  York.  490  pp. 

Greene,  R.  and  R.  Ellis.  1971.  Merriam's  turkey.  Game  management  in 
Montana.  Mussehl  and  Howell,  ed.  Montana  Dept.  of  Fish  &  Game, 
pp.  167-173. 

Freeman,  J.  S.  1971.  Pronghorn  range  use  and  relation  to  livestock  in 
southeastern  Montana.  M.S.  Thesis,  MSU,  Bozeman.  45  pp. 

Hayne,  D.  W.  1949.  Calculation  of  size  of  home  range.  J.  Mamm.  30:1-18. 


■53- 


Jonas,  R.     1966.     Merriam's  turkey  in  southeastern  Montana.     Mont.  Dept. 
of  Fish  &  Game.     Tech.  Bull.  No.  3.     36  pp. 

Knowles,  C.  J.     1975.     Range  relationships  of  mule  deer,  elk  and  cattle 
in  a  rest-rotation  grazing  system  during  summer  and  fall.     M.S. 
Thesis,  MSU,  Bozeman.  Ill  pp. 

Komberec,  T.  J.     1976.     Range  relationships  of  mule  deer,  elk  and  cattle 
in  a  rest-rotation  grazing  system  during  winter  and  spring.     M.S. 
Thesis.     MSU,  Bozeman.     79  pp. 

Mackie,  R.  J.     1970.     Range  ecology  and  relationships  of  mule  deer,  elk 

and  cattle  in  the  Missouri  River  Breaks.     Wildl.  Monog.  No.  20.     77  pp. 

Martinka,  C  .  J.     1969.     Population  ecology  of  summer  resident  elk  in 
Jackson  Hole,  Wyoming.     J.  Wildl.  Manage.     33(3) :465-481. 

Martin,  A.  C. ,  H.  S.  Zim  and  A.  L.  Nelson.     1951.     American  wildlife 

and  plants— a  guide  to  wildlife  food  habits.     Dover  Press,  New  York. 
500  pp. 

Mohr,  C.  0.     1947.     Table  of  equivalent  populations  of  North  American 
small  mammals.     American  Midi.  Nat.     37:223-249. 

Robinette,  W.  L.     1966.     Mule  deer  home  range  and  dispersal  in  Utah. 
J.  Wildl.  Manage.     30(2) : 335-349. 

U.  S.  Dept.  of  Comm.     1972-76.     Climatological  data  with  comparative  data 
for  Roundup,  Montana. 


Y 


■54- 


\ 


c 


c 


3 


J