Skip to main content

Full text of "California fish and game"

See other formats


CAUFORNIAl 
FISH-GAME 

"COKSKRVATION  OF  WILDLIFE  THROUGH  EDUCATION" 


California  Fish  and  Game  is  a  journal  devoted  to  the  conservation  of  v/ild- 
life.  If  its  contents  are  reproduced  elsev/here,  the  authors  and  the  California 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game  would  appreciate  being  acknowledged. 

Subscriptions  may  be  obtained  at  the  rate  of  $5  per  year  by  placing  an 
order  with  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  1416  Ninth  Street, 
Sacramento,  California  95814.  Money  orders  and  checks  should  be  made  out 
to  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game.  Inquiries  regarding  paid  sub- 
scriptions should  be  directed  to  the  Editor. 

Complimentary  subscriptions  are  granted,  on  a  limited  basis,  to  libraries, 
scientific  and  educational  institutions,  conservation  agencies,  and  on  exchange. 
Complimentary  subscriptions  must  be  renewed  annually  by  returning  the  post- 
card enclosed  with  each  October  issue. 


Please  direct  correspondence  to: 

Kenneth  A.  Hashagen,  Jr.,  Editor 
California  Fish  and  Game 
1416  Ninth  Street 
Sacramento,  California  95814 


129 


Ij 


0 


VOLUME  66 


JULY  1980 


NUMBER  3 


Published  Quarterly  by 

STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA 

THE  RESOURCES  AGENCY 

DEPARTMENT  OF  FISH  AND  GAME 

—LDA— 


130  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA 
EDMUND  G.  BROWN  JR.,  Governor 


THE  RESOURCES  AGENCY 
HUEY  D.  JOHNSON,  Secretary  for  Resources 


FISH  AND  GAME  COMMISSION 

SHERMAN  CHICKERING,  President 
San  Francisco 

ELIZABETH  L.  VENRICK,  Vice  President  ABEL  GALETTI,  IVIember 

Cardiff  Los  Angeles 

BERGER  C.  BENSON,  Member  RAYMOND  DASMANN,  Member 

San  Mateo  Nevada  City 


DEPARTMENT  OF  FISH  AND  GAME 
E.  C.  FULLERTON,  Director 

1416  9th  Street 
Sacramento  95814 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 
Editorial  Staff 

KENNETH  A.  HASHAGEN,  JR.,  Editor-in-Chief Sacramento 

DARLENE  A.  OSBORNE,  Editor  for  Inland  Fishenes Sacramento 

RONALD  M.  JUREK,  Editor  for  Wildlife  Sacramento 

J.  R.  RAYMOND  ALLY,  Editor  for  Manne  Resources  Long  Beach 

DAVID  A.  HOOPAUGH,  Editor  for  Salmon  pnd  Steelhead Sacramento 

DONALD  E.  STEVENS,  Editor  for  Striped  Bass,  Sturgeon,  and  Shad Stockton 

KIM  McCLENEGHAN,  Editor  for  Environmental  Services ' Rancho  Cordova 


CONTENTS 


131 


Page 


Impact  of  Florida  Largemouth  Bass,  Micropterus  salmoides 
floridanus.  Introductions  at  Selected  Northern  California 
Waters,  With  a  Discussion  of  the  Use  of  Meristics  for  De- 
tecting Introgression  and  for  Classifying  Individual  Fish  of 
Intergraded  Populations     Ronald  J.  Pelznnan     133 

Exploitation,  Natural  Mortality,  and  Survival  of  Smallnnouth 

Bass  and  Largemouth  Bass  in  Shasta  Lake,  California 

William  F.  Van  Woert     163 

Diet  and  Behavioral  Aspects  of  the  Wolf-Eel,  Anarrhichthys 
ocellatus,  on  Sandy  Bottom  in  Monterey  Bay,  California  .. 
Larry  W.  FHulberg  and  Patsy  Graber    172 

Decline  of  the  Lake  Greenhaven  Sacramento  Perch 
Population     C.  David  Vanicek    178 

Notes 

A  Population  of  the  Endangered  Santa  Cruz  Long-Toed  Sala- 
mander, Ambystoma  macrodactylum  croceum,  from  Mon- 
terey County,  California      Larry  G.  Talent  and  Carline  L.  Talent    184 

Repeat  Spawning  of  Pacific  Lamprey      John  H.  Michael,  Jr.     186 

A  Diver-Operated  Snagging  Device  for  Capturing  Lingcod, 

Ophiodon  elongatus      James  L.  Houk    187 

Karyotype  of  the  Sacramento  Perch,  Archoplites  interruptus 

Craig  A.  Busack  and  Gary  H.  Thorgaard    189 

Book  Reviews    192 


ERRATUM 
Lesh,  E.  W.  1980.  A  head-off  method  of  measuring  chinook  and  coho 
salmon.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  66(1)  :  59-62. 
Page  60,  61.  The  coefficient  of  deterrpination  should  be  (r^). 
Page  61.  The  ordinate  of  Figure  3  should  read:  Fork  length  v^ith  head  off 
in  millimetres. 

The  abscissa  of  Figure  3  should  read:  Fork  length  with  head  on  in  mil- 
limetres. 


132  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


IN  MEMORIAM 

J.  BRUCE  KIMSEY 

J.  Bruce  Kimsey  was  born  in  Portland,  Oregon  on  18  July  1921  and  died  on  24 
January  1980  at  the  Kaiser  Hospital  in  Sacramento  after  a  lengthy  illness.  Bruce 
leaves  a  wife  and  two  grown  sons  and  a  legacy  of  devotion  to  his  family  and  his 
career.  He  had  a  long  and  productive  career  as  a  professional  biologist  in  fisheries 
research  and  management  that  spanned  about  32  years. 

Bruce  received  a  B.A.  degree  from  Chico  State  University  in  1948  and  an  M.A. 
degree  from  the  University  of  California  at  Berkeley  in  1951.  He  served  with  the 
Armed  Forces  in  the  South  Pacific  during  World  War  II.  His  first  permanent 
position  in  fisheries  was  with  the  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  as  a 
Junior  Aquatic  Biologist  in  1948. 

Bruce  had  wide  ranging  responsibilities  with  the  Department  on  matters  con- 
cerning inland  fisheries.  Probably  the  most  challenging  position  during  the  13 
years  he  worked  for  the  Department  was  as  a  leader  of  statewide  warmwater 
fisheries  coordination  and  research.  It  was  during  this  period  that  most  of  his 
publications  appeared. 

His  publications  numbered  about  45.  Most  appeared  in  either  California  Fish 
and  Game  or  the  Inland  Fisheries  Administrative  Report  series.  Bruce's  interest 
and  enthusiasm  for  all  aspects  of  natural  history  were  reflected  in  his  publications, 
some  which  concerned  birds  and  appeared  in  the  Condor. 

Bruce's  expertise  in  fisheries  matters  led  to  a  long  involvement  and  much 
overseas  travel  as  a  consultant  for  a  number  of  foreign  aid  organizations.  Bruce 
and  his  family  spent  an  entire  year  at  Lakes  George  and  Edward  in  Uganda  on 
an  assessment  of  the  fish  stocks  plus  the  training  of  African  fisheries  workers.  This 
was  just  the  begining  and  throughout  the  remainder  of  his  career,  Bruce  took  part 
in  numerous  short-term  overseas  assignments.  Besides  Uganda,  Bruce  traveled  to 
Kenya,  Tanzania,  Rhodesia,  Cameroon,  Brazil,  Colombia,  El  Salvador,  Nicaragua, 
Philippines,  and  Indonesia. 

After  leaving  the  Department  in  1961,  Bruce  went  to  work  for  the  old  U.  S. 
Bureau  of  Commercial  Fisheries  as  leader  of  a  shrimp  research  project  with 
headquarters  at  Galveston,  Texas.  He  later  moved  to  the  Bureau's  main  office  in 
Washington,  D.C.  where  he  assessed  fisheries  developments  in  various  countries 
around  the  world.  He  transferred  in  1 961  to  the  old  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Sport  Fisheries 
and  Wildlife  where  he  became  Chief  of  the  Branch  of  Ecosystem  Research.  In  this 
capacity  he  supervised  six  laboratories  engaged  in  reservoir  and  marine  sportfish 
research.  Bruce  returned  to  Sacramento  in  1971  where  he  assumed  the  position 
of  Regional  Environmental  Quality  Officer  for  the  Mid-Pacific  Region  of  the  Water 
and  Power  Resources  Service.  He  remained  at  this  post  until  he  died. 

Bruce  was  a  fellow  of  the  American  Institute  of  Fishery  Research  Biologists  and 
a  member  of  various  honorary  and  professional  societies.  He  was  President  of  the 
California-Nevada  Chapter  of  the  American  Fisheries  Society  in  1976  and  served 
as  chairman  or  member  of  numerous  national  and  regional  committees  of  this 
organization. 

Bruce  will  be  sorely  missed  by  his  many  friends  and  co-workers  from  around 
the  world. — Almo  J.  Cordone 


FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  133 

Calif.  Fish  and  Game  66  ( 3 ) :  1 33-1 62 

IMPACT  OF  FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS,  MICROP- 

TERUS  SALMOIDES  FLORIDANUS,  INTRODUCTIONS  AT 

SELECTED  NORTHERN  CALIFORNIA  WATERS  WITH  A 

DISCUSSION  OF  THE  USE  OF  MERISTICS  FOR  DETECTING 

INTROGRESSION  AND  FOR  CLASSIFYING  INDIVIDUAL 

FISH  OF  INTERGRADED  POPULATIONS  ^ 

RONALD  J.  PELZMAN 

California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game 

Inland  Fisheries  Branch 

1701  Nimbus  Road 

Rancho  Cordova,  CA  95670 

Florida  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus  salmoides  floridanus,  had  a  notable  genetic 
impact  following  their  introduction  into  five  northern  California  waters  containing 
northern  largemouth  bass,  M.  s.  salmoides,  populations:  Folsom  Lake,  New  Hogan 
Reservoir,  Lake  Amador,  Lake  Isabella,  and  Clear  Lake.  Analysis  of  malate  dehy- 
drogenase isozyme  patterns  of  fish  systematically  collected  in  years  subsequent  to 
the  introduction  indicated  that  intergraded  populations  developed  at  each  of  the 
waters.  Incidence  of  the  Florida  allele  at  the  study  waters,  based  on  malate  dehy- 
drogenase analyses,  eventually  ranged  from  0.35  at  Lake  Amador  to  0.52  at  both  New 
Hogan  Reservoir  and  Clear  Lake. 

Discriminant  function  analysis  of  meristic  data  for  fish  of  known  electrophoretic 
phenotype  showed  that  meristic  values  were  not  reliable  for  classifying  individual 
fish  from  mixed  populations  as  to  Florida,  northern,  or  hybrid  bass  categories.  This 
was  supported  by  meristic  data  for  known  F-,  hybrids.  Hybridization  could  not 
necessarily  be  detected  by  an  increase  in  mean  meristic  value  or  by  unimodality  of 
a  frequency  distribution  of  meristic  values.  The  mode  value  of  lateral  line  scale 
counts  appeared  to  be  the  best  meristic  indicator  of  hybridization. 

Information  from  this  study  and  from  a  similar  study  at  southern  California  waters 
indicates  that  introductions  of  Florida  bass  into  northern  bass  populations  have 
generally  been  beneficial  through  reducing  high  exploitation  rates,  increasing  the 
mean  size  of  bass  in  the  catch,  and  providing  exceptional  fishing  for  trophy-sized 
bass  at  some  waters. 

Results  of  this  study  indicate  that  current  largemouth  bass  populations  at  the  study 
waters  possess  a  wider  spectrum  of  performance  capabilities  through  the  inclusion 
of  desirable  traits  attributed  to  Florida  bass.  This  is  particularly  advantageous  in  the 
reservoir  setting  where  heavy  angling  pressure,  water  level  manipulation,  competi- 
tion of  prey  species  with  small  bass,  and  other  factors  work  against  the  maintenance 
of  a  bass  population. 

TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Page 

ABSTRACT 133 

INTRODUCTION   134 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 138 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 141 

Electrophoretic  Analysis — Malate  Dehydrogenase 141 

Frequency  of  the  Florida  Allele  Based  on  Malate  Dehydrogenase 

'  This  work  was  performed  as  part  of  Dingell-Johnson  Project  F-18-R,  "Coldwater  Reservoir  and  Special  Experi- 
mental Reservoir  Program,"  supported  by  Federal  Aid  to  Fish  Restoration  funds.  Accepted  for  publication. 


134  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Analyses  144 

Electrophoretic  Analysis — Tetrazolium  Oxidase  147 

Meristic  Analysis 148 

Use  of  Meristic  Data  in  Evaluating  Study  Populations 151 

Population  Sampling 154 

Rancho  Seco  Reservoir 155 

Maladaptive  Genes 156 

Performance  Capabilities  of  Fish  of  Intergraded  Populations  157 

Management  Implications 158 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  160 

REFERENCES  160 

INTRODUCTION 

Northern  largemouth  bass  were  widely  distributed  to  California's  low-  and 
mid-elevation  waters  in  the  years  following  their  introduction  from  Quincy, 
Illinois^  in  1891  (Shebley  1917).  Florida  largemouth  bass  were  not  introduced 
until  1959  when  about  20,400  fingeriings  from  Holt  State  Fish  FHatchery,  Pen- 
sacola,  Florida  were  liberated  at  Upper  Otay  Reservoir,  San  Diego  County, 
which  had  been  chemically  treated  to  eradicate  all  fish  and  closed  to  public 
access  (Sasaki  1961).  These  fish  and  their  progeny  were  stocked  at  many 
southern  California  waters  under  the  concept  that  Florida  bass  superiority  in 
growth  rate  and  longevity  and  possible  lower  vulnerability  to  angling  would 
provide  bass  stocks  with  more  large  fish  than  northern  bass  were  providing. 
While  Florida  bass  were  stocked  into  northern  bass  populations  at  most  of  these 
waters,  Lake  Hodges,  San  Diego  County,  which  served  as  a  source  for  some 
Florida  bass  plants  in  northern  California,  was  dewatered  and  chemically  treated 
prior  to  receiving  Upper  Otay  fish  in  1969  (L.  Bottroff,  Fishery  Biologist,  Calif. 
Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun.). 

Florida  bass  were  first  stocked  in  northern  California  (that  portion  of  California 
north  of  the  Tehachapi  Mountains)  in  April  1969  at  Clear  Lake  and  Hidden 
Valley  Reservoir,  both  in  Lake  County,  from  Upper  Otay  Reservoir  (R.  Wood, 
Fishery  Biologist,  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun.).  Northern  bass 
were  present  at  Clear  Lake,  while  newly  impounded  Hidden  Valley  Reservoir 
was  devoid  of  bass  at  the  time  the  introductions  were  made.  From  1970  through 
1973,  Florida  bass  were  stocked  at  a  limited  number  of  northern  California 
waters  containing  northern  bass  of  Illinois  origin,  including  the  five  waters  exam- 
ined by  this  study  ( Figure  1 ) .  During  that  period,  Florida  bass  were  also  stocked 
at  a  small  number  of  waters  that  were  devoid  of  bass  including  a  farm  pond  in 
the  San  Joaquin  Valley  and  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir,  Sacramento  County.  These 
two  waters  served  as  sources  for  plants  made  later  at  the  study  waters  (Figure 
1). 

The  largemouth  bass  present  at  the  study  waters  were  considered  descendants 
of  northern  bass  brought  to  California  from  the  northern  part  of  their  range  in 
the  United  States.  Based  on  a  review  of  fish  stocking  records  and  communica- 
tions with  knowledgeable  hatchery  personnel  and  fishery  biologists,  northern 

'  The  earliest  documentation  of  largemouth  bass  shipments  into  California  gives  1891  as  the  year  of  introduction 
(Shebley  1917).  According  to  Shebley  the  United  States  Commission  brought  largemouth  bass  and  warmouth 
"bass"  here  for  stocking  at  Lake  Cuyamaca  and  the  Feather  River.  While  the  source  for  largemouth  bass  is 
not  given  it  was  very  likely  Quincy,  Illinois  since  this  is  given  as  the  warmouth  "bass"  source. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


135 


HOLT    HATCHERY 
PENSACOLA,  FL. 


1959 


■^969- 


UPPER    OTAY 
RESERVOIR 


1972 
1973 


RANCHOSECG 
RESERVOIR 


REGION  4^ 
FARM   POND 


HIDDEN 

VALLEY 

RESERVOIR 


1970 
1971 


FOLSOM 
LAKE 


LAKE 
AMADOR 


HOGAN 
RESERVOIR 


LAKE 
ISABELLA 


1969 

u 


CLEAR 
LAKE 


FIGURE  1.  History  of  Florida  largemouth  bass  stocking  as  related  to  the  study  waters  (1-5).^ 
Region  4  is  one  of  six  geographical  areas  of  California  designated  by  the  Department 
for  administrative  and  mangement  purposes.  It  includes  largely  the  San  Joaquin  Valley 
and  adjacent  foothills. 


bass  from  other  portions  of  their  range  were  not  stocked  at  the  five  study  waters 
prior  to  the  period  of  this  study. 

Apparent  intolerance  of  Florida  bass  to  4°C  in  Missouri  (Johnson  1975)  and 
concern  that  maladaptive  genes  possibly  related  to  this  intolerance  would  be 
transmitted  to  northern  bass  populations  (Childers  1975),  prompted  the  Depart- 
ment to  establish  a  moratorium  in  May  1974  on  further  stockings  of  the  subspe- 
cies in  northern  California.  Consequently,  this  study  was  initiated  in  July  1975  to 
evaluate  the  survival  and  genetic  impact  of  Florida  bass  at  northern  California 
waters.  Largemouth  bass  populations  at  Folsom  Lake,  Sacrdmento  County;  New 
Hogan  Reservoir,  Calaveras  County;  Lake  Amador,  Amador  County;  Clear  Lake, 
Lake  County;  and  Lake  Isabella,  Kern  County  were  selected  for  evaluation.  The 
largemouth  bass  population  at  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  was  also  analyzed  since 
it  served  as  a  source  for  Florida  bass  plants  at  four  of  the  study  waters. 

Identification  of  Florida  and  northern  largemouth  bass  and  their  hybrids  was 
critical  to  evaluating  mixed  populations  at  the  study  waters.  Bailey  and  Hubbs 
( 1 949 )  first  used  scale  counts  for  separation.  Workers  since  have  counted  scales, 
pyloric  caeca,  and  vertebrae,  and  made  body  measurements  (Bottroff  1967; 
Buchanan  1968;  Bryan  1969;  Addison  and  Spencer  1971;  Buchanan  1973;  Chew 
1975;  Johnson  1975;  and  Bottroff  and  Lembeck  1978). 


136  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

Physiological  differences  between  Florida  and  northern  largennouth  bass  were 
reported  by  Hart  (1952).  Bryan  (1964)  noted  differences  between  serum  elec- 
tropherograms  of  the  two  subspecies.  Differences  in  the  electrophoretic  mobility 
of  isozymes  (different  molecular  forms  of  enzymes)  from  tissues  of  largemouth 
and  smallmouth  bass  and  their  hybrids  were  described  by  Whitt,  Childers,  and 
Wheat  (1971).  Chew  (1975)  reported  that  Dr.  William  Childers  of  the  Illinois 
Natural  History  Survey,  Urbana,  Illinois,  was  able  to  separate  Florida  bass, 
northern  bass,  and  fish  thought  to  be  their  hybrids  by  isozyme  analysis.  Childers 
( pers.  commun. )  utilized  starch  gel  electrophoresis  and  separated  the  fish  on  the 
basis  of  their  different  isozyme  patterns  of  the  enzyme  malate  dehydrogenase 
(MDH). 

As  related  to  this  study,  gel  electrophoresis  is  a  method  for  observing  genetic 
variation  of  mixed  populations  by  examining  variant  proteins  (isozymes)  manu- 
factured by  different  individuals.  A  tissue  sample  from  each  individual  to  be 
studied  is  homogenized  to  release  its  cell  contents,  including  isozymes.  These 
are  introduced  into  a  gel  made  of  starch  and  subjected  to  an  electric  current  for 
a  few  hours.  Each  isozyme  in  the  sample  migrates  through  the  gel  in  a  direction 
and  a  rate  that  depends  primarily  on  its  net  electric  charge  and,  to  some  extent, 
on  its  molecular  size  and  conformation.  The  gel  is  then  treated  with  a  solution 
containing  a  specific  substrate,  which  is  cleaved  by  the  enzyme  to  be  observed, 
and  a  salt,  which  couples  with  the  cleavage  products.  This  process  yields  a 
colored  band  at  the  zone  to  which  the  enzyme  has  migrated. 

Because  isozymes  that  are  specified  by  different  alleles  may  have  different 
molecular  structures  and  charges  (and  hence  different  mobilities  in  an  electric 
field),  the  genetic  makeup  at  the  gene  locus  coding  for  a  given  enzyme  can  be 
established  for  each  individual  from  the  number  and  position  of  the  electropho- 
retic bands  (Ayala  1978).  The  advantage  of  data  obtained  through  gel  electro- 
phoresis is  that  genetic  interpretations  can  be  made  directly.  Most  variant  alleles 
show  codominant  expression.  This  permits  designation  of  the  genotypes  of 
individual  samples  based  on  staining  patterns  (Utter,  Hodgins,  and  Allendorf 
1 974) .  When  animals  are  crossed  that  are  homozygous  for  different  codominant 
alleles  at  the  same  locus,  their  offspring  are  heterozygous,  receiving  one  allele 
from  each  parent.  Because  each  allele  codes  for  a  slightly  different  protein, 
heterozygosity  can  be  inferred  from  the  presence  of  two  variants  of  a  given 
protein  in  a  single  individual  (Ayala  1 978) .  The  simplest  form  of  diploid  variation 
is  when  two  codominant  alleles  are  present  in  a  population,  one  specifying  a 
fast-moving  band  and  the  other  a  slow-moving  band.  An  individual  homozygous 
for  either  allele  will  show  a  single  band,  whereas  the  heterozygote  will  have  both 
bands  (Gottlieb  1971). 

Childers  (pers.  commun.)  found  that  the  MDH  isozyme  patterns  (pheno- 
types)  of  Florida  largemouth  bass  and  northern  largemouth  bass  (from  the 
northern  part  of  their  geographic  range)  differed  (Figure  2).  Florida  bass  and 
northern  bass  were  both  homozygous  for  supernatant  MDH-A  and  MDH-B. 
However,  because  of  mutational  differences  in  the  makeup  of  the  B  gene  locus, 
the  most  anodal  band  (B„  B„,;  m  ==  fast)  of  the  Florida  bass  showed  greater 
mobility  than  the  most  anodal  band  (B,  B^;  s  =  slow)  of  northern  bass  (Figure 
2).  The  A  gene  locus  and  B  gene  locus  of  the  northern  bass  each  code  for  the 
production  of  a  different  subunit  (A  and  B^,  respectively).  These  translated 
subunits  randomly  combine  to  form  the  various  dimers  which  will  migrate 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


137 


through  starch  gel  differing  distances  in  response  to  an  electric  current  to  pro- 
duce a  three-banded  pattern.  The  Florida  bass  pattern  is  similarly  produced  by 
an  A  gene  locus  and  a  B  gene  locus,  each  coding  for  the  production  of  a  different 
subunit  (A  and  B„,  respectively).  When  northern  and  Florida  bass  are  crossed 
the  genotype  AA  B„B.  translates  subunits  that  randomly  combine  to  form  six 
dimers  (AA,  AB„  B,B.,  AB„,  B„B„  and  B„B„).  This  appears  as  a  five-banded 
pattern,  hov^ever,  since  two  dimers  (B,B,  and  ABn,)  migrate  the  same  distance 
in  starch  gel.  The  F,  hybrid  shows  all  bands  found  in  Florida  and  northern  bass 
plus  an  additional  band  ( B„BJ .  For  discussion  of  MDH  phenotypes,  MM  is  used 
for  Florida  bass,  SS  for  northern  bass,  and  MS  for  the  hybrid. 


[        NORTHERN 
I     UARGEMOUTH 
BASS 


FLORIDA   LARGEMOUTH  BASS 


F,  HYBRID 


FIGURE  2.  Malate  dehydrogenase  and  tetrazolium  oxidase  phenotypes  of  northern  and  Florida 
largemouth  bass  and  their  F,  hybrid.  '  Results  from  study  waters  showed  all  MS  fish 
by  MDH  pattern  to  show  only  MM  or  MS  by  TO. 

The  frequency  of  alleles  in  a  given  population  can  be  measured  by  direct 
counts  from  the  electrophoretic  expression  of  a  representative  sample  (Utter 
and  Allendorf  1977).  In  this  study,  the  number  of  M  alleles  (coding  for  the  B„B„ 
band)  and  S  alleles  (coding  for  the  83,  band)  in  a  population  was  determined 
(see  Figure  3  for  example).  The  number  of  MDhI  genes  in  a  particular  collection 
is  twice  the  number  of  individuals  sampled  because  a  complementary  pair  of 
MDH  genes  are  coded  in  each  individual.  A  homozygous  individual  codes  in 
duplicate  for  a  given  allelic  form  and  the  heterozygous  individual  codes  for  two 
different  allelic  forms. 

Childers  (pers.  commun.)  used  an  additional  enzyme  system,  tetrazolium 
oxidase  (TO),  which  permitted  partial  separation  of  Florida  and  northern  bass 
(Figure  2).  He  found  that  northern  bass  were  homozygous,  showing  a  single 


138 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


fast-moving  band  (MM),  whereas  Florida  bass  showed  either  the  fast-moving 
band  (MM),  or  a  single  slow-moving  band  (SS),  or  a  heterozygous  three  band- 
ed pattern  (MM,  MS,  and  SS).  Fish  thought  to  be  first  filial  generation  hybrids 
between  Florida  and  northern  bass  showed  the  MM  or  MS  pattern.  Tetrazolium 
oxidase  was  used  in  this  study  to  provide  supportive  data. 


PHENOTYPE 

SS 

MS 

MM 

NO.  OF  FISH 

SHOWING 

PHENOTYPE 

25 

50 

25 

NO.  OF  FLORIDA 
BASS  ALLELES 
IN  SAMPLE 

2X25^=^50 

Wms 

100 

NO.  OF  NORTHERN 
BASS  ALLELES 
IN  SAMPLE 

2X253=50 

"■  50n,s 
100 

FREQUENCY    OF 

FLORIDA 
ALLELE    (M) 

^00=0.50 
200 

FREQUENCY  OF 

NORTHERN 
ALLELE    (S) 

100   -0.50 
200 

FIGURE  3.  Calculation  of  gene  frequency  for  a  collection  of  100  fish  composed  of  25  fish  showing 
the  SS  phenotype,  50  showing  the  MS  phenotype,  and  25  showing  the  MM  pheno- 
type. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 

Fish  from  purportedly  pure  California  sources  of  Florida  bass  ( Upper  Otay  and 
Hidden  Valley  reservoirs)  and  northern  bass  (Central  Valleys  Warmwater 
Hatchery,  Sacramento  County;  Shasta  Lake,  Shasta  County;  and  Merle  Collins 
Reservoir,  Yuba  County)  were  examined  meristically  and  electrophoretically. 
Results  for  fish  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery  were  of  particular 
interest.  This  hatchery  had  been  involved  for  many  years  with  stocking  northern 


FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  139 

largemouth  bass  at  northern  California  waters,  including  Folsom  Lake,  New 
Hogan  Reservoir,  and  Lake  Amador  ( M.  Cochran,  Fish  Hatchery  Manager,  Calif. 
Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun.).  Also,  hatchery  brood  fish  had  been 
obtained  from  several  northern  California  sources. 

Fish  from  mixed  populations  were  analyzed  using  meristic  and  electrophoretic 
information  for  pure  populations  as  baseline  data.  The  study  plan  was  to  assess 
the  degree  of  hybridization  of  Florida  and  northern  bass  by  analyzing  100 
young-of-the-year  bass  from  each  of  the  study  waters  annually.  Electrophoresis 
was  the  primary  method  used;  however,  since  no  largemouth  bass  study  involv- 
ing both  meristic  and  electrophoretic  evaluations  of  the  same  fish  was  found  in 
the  literature,  meristic  data  were  collected  through  1977  for  fish  analyzed  elec- 
trophoretically.  This  provided  a  means  to  assess  the  value  of  meristic  data  for 
classifying  individual  fish  from  mixed  populations  and  to  determine  if  meristics 
could  be  used  by  fishery  managers  in  their  assessment  of  the  degree  of  hybridiza- 
tion of  mixed  populations. 

Fish  were  collected  by  electroshocking  each  fall  from  1975  through  1978.  So 
that  samples  would  be  representative  of  populations  being  evaluated,  collections 
were  made  using  the  following  guidelines: 

(1 )  Sample  at  each  of  the  four  major  compass  directions. 

(2)  Sample  representative  cover  types. 

(3)  Collect  young-of-the-year  of  all  sizes. 

(4)  Collect  no  more  than  10  fish  when  encountering  heavy  concentrations 
of  fish  such  as  at  the  apex  of  coves,  in  brushy  areas,  etc. 

Fish  were  sacrificed,  individually  enclosed  in  plastic  bags,  and  transported  in 
crushed  ice  to  prevent  breakdown  of  enzyme  systems.  At  the  laboratory  they 
were  retained  in  ice  until  each  received  an  identifying  tag  and  tissue  was 
removed  for  analysis.  When  time  did  not  permit  this,  fish  were  frozen  and  later 
thawed  a  few  at  a  time  for  processing.  Skeletal  muscle  tissue,  used  for  MDFH, 
was  removed  from  an  area  just  below  the  dorsal  fin  on  the  right  side  of  the  fish 
to  facilitate  scale  counts.  Liver  tissue  was  taken  for  TO  analysis.  All  utensils  and 
the  worker's  hands  were  thoroughly  cleaned  after  each  fish  was  processed.  Each 
fish  and  all  samples  removed  from  it  received  an  identifying  code  which  includ- 
ed information  as  to  the  year  and  water  of  collection.  For  example,  F-lll-1  was 
the  first  fish  of  the  third  year  of  collection  at  Folsom  Lake,  and  F-lll-2  was  the 
second  fish,  etc.  Tissue  samples  were  frozen  separately  in  vials  until  analysis 
could  be  made. 

In  some  cases  older  fish  were  used  and  information  from  them  was  back- 
logged  to  their  year  of  birth  based  on  scale  analysis.  Use  of  older  fish  was 
generally  avoided,  however,  because  of  possible  differential  survival  and  was 
done  only  to  provide  information  for  years  prior  to  1975  or  to  provide  samples 
for  years  when  drought  conditions,  scarcity  of  fish,  or  other  factors  limited  or 
prevented  collection  of  young-of-the-year  fish. 

Meristic  data  were  collected  following  procedures  outlined  by  FHubbs  and 
Lagler  (1949).  The  six  counts  made  included  the  number  of  1 )  scales  along  the 
lateral  line,  2)  scale  rows  above  the  lateral  line,  3)  scale  rows  below  the  lateral 
line,  4)  scale  rows  around  the  caudal  peduncle,  5)  scale  rows  on  the  cheek,  and 
6)  pyloric  caeca.  A  pointer  was  used  for  making  scale  counts.  A  dissecting  scope 
was  used  for  counts  on  small  fish.  In  most  cases  individual  scale  counts  were 
made  twice  and  if  they  were  the  same  the  value  was  accepted.  If  they  were  not 


140  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

identical  an  additional  count  was  made  and  the  dominant  value  was  used. 
Pyloric  caeca  were  counted  once. 

Each  tissue  sample  was  thawed  to  permit  removal  of  a  small  portion  which 
was  homogenized  in  two  volumes  of  0.1  M  tris-HCl  at  pH  7.0  in  a  "Thomas" 
homogenizer  for  6  to  10  s  using  a  variable  speed  electric  drill.  The  sample  was 
then  centrifuged  for  20  minutes  in  a  "Sorvall  Superspeed  RC  2-B  "refrigerated 
centrifuge  at  48,000  X  g  at  4°C.  The  supernatant  was  removed  and  held  at  4°C 
until  analysis  was  completed.  The  homogenizer  and  utensils  were  thoroughly 
cleaned  after  each  sample. 

A  tris-citrate  pH  6.8  stock  buffer  of  0.75  tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane 
and  0.25  M  citric  acid  (monohydrate)  was  diluted  1:30  for  the  gel  and  1:7  for 
the  electrodes.  In  preparing  the  gel,  195  ml  of  buffer  was  brought  to  a  boil,  and 
added  to  a  solution  composed  of  30  g  of  potato  starch  and  55  ml  of  the  same 
buffer.  All  air  bubbles  were  extracted  with  vacuum  drain  by  a  waterjet  aspirator 
and  the  warm  solution  was  poured  into  a  plastic  frame  (21.0  cm  X  12.2  cm  X 
0.7  cm)  positioned  on  a  flat  glass  plate  slightly  larger  in  area.  When  the  gel  had 
cooled  the  frame  was  removed  and  plastic  strips,  half  the  thickness  of  the  gel, 
were  placed  along  each  side  of  the  gel.  A  length  of  monofilament  line  was  placed 
tightly  across  the  strips  and  drawn  through  the  length  of  the  gel,  slicing  it  into 
equal  layers.  The  upper  layer  could  then  be  discarded  or  carefully  positioned  on 
another  glass  plate  to  provide  two  gels. 

A  small  piece  of  filter  paper  was  wetted  with  the  supernatant  sample  and 
implanted  in  the  gel.  Up  to  20  samples  were  implanted  along  a  straight  line  7 
cm  from  one  end  of  the  gel,  spaced  far  enough  apart  to  prevent  contamination. 
Utensils  were  thoroughly  cleaned  between  implants.  The  gel  was  then  covered 
with  plastic  wrap  to  prevent  drying,  except  for  an  area  about  2  cm  wide  along 
each  end. 

The  gel  was  placed  horizontally  in  an  electrophoresis  chamber  such  that  the 
portion  containing  the  samples  was  nearest  the  cathodal  end  of  the  chamber. 
The  chamber  was  constructed  of  plastic  and  included  reservoirs  along  opposite 
ends.  Each  of  these  contained  a  platinum  wire  electrode  along  its  length  and 
150-200  ml  of  tris-citrate  bridge  buffer  at  pH  6.8.  A  nonwoven  towel  (made  by 
"Masslinn")  served  as  a  wick  and  electrical  conductor  from  reservoir  to  gel. 
Each  wick  was  drawn  up  onto  the  gel  to  cover  that  portion  of  the  gel  not  covered 
by  plastic  wrap.  The  wicks  were  also  covered  with  plastic  wrap.  The  chamber 
was  then  placed  into  a  refrigerator  and  connected  to  a  regulated  power  supply. 
The  gel  was  subjected  to  200-VDC  (9.5V/cm)  for  10  h  at  4°C. 

The  zones  of  isozyme  activity  were  stained  for  identification  using  100  ml  of 
tris-citrate  buffer  (Trizma  0.03  M  and  citric  acid  0.005  M)  at  pH  8.5,  20  ml  of 
malate-NaOH  at  pH  7.0  (0.5  M),  5  mg  of  nicotinamide  adenine  dinucleotide, 
5  mg  of  nitro  blue  tetrazoiium,  and  3  mg  of  phenazine  methosulfate.  The  gel  was 
covered  with  this  solution  and  incubated  in  the  dark  at  37°C  until  the  banding 
patterns  were  interpretable.  It  was  then  rinsed  with  water  and  fixed  with  a 
solution  of  water  (five  volumes),  methanol  (four  volumes),  and  acetic  acid 
(one  volume)  to  facilitate  handling. 

The  procedure  for  tetrazoiium  oxidase  was  identical  to  that  used  for  malate 
dehydrogenase  with  the  exception  of  a  different  stain  solution  of  100  ml  of  0.5 
M  tris-HCl  at  pH  9.0,  15  mg  of  nitro  blue  tetrazoiium,  and  15  mg  of  phenazine 
methosulfate. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  141 

Isozyme  patterns  of  fish  collected  annually  at  the  study  waters  were  used  to 
interpret  the  genetic  impact  of  Florida  bass.  Presence  of  the  MS  pattern  in  a 
population  indicated  that  hybridization  had  occurred,  and  the  frequency  of  the 
Florida  allele  in  a  population  indicated  the  extent  of  genetic  influence  of  Florida 
bass  on  that  population. 

Reciprocal  crosses  of  single  pairs  of  Florida  and  northern  largemouth  bass 
were  made  in  tanks  at  the  Department's  experimental  management  facility 
(Field  Station)  in  Sacramento  in  spring  1978.  This  was  done  to  confirm  the 
isozyme  pattern  (MS)  of  suspected  hybrids  from  mixed  populations,  to  obtain 
meristic  data  for  F,  hybrids,  and  to  eventually  determine  the  frequency  of  iso- 
zyme patterns  resulting  from  crosses  of  F,  hybrids,  and  from  backcrosses. 

Meristic  data  for  fish  of  known  electrophoretic  phenotype  were  statistically 
analyzed  to  determine  if  individual  fish  could  be  assigned  to  Florida  bass,  north- 
ern bass,  or  hybrid  categories  on  the  basis  of  five  different  scale  counts  and 
pyloric  caeca  counts.  Group  membership  was  examined  using  discriminant 
function  analysis.  This  method  finds  an  axis  so  that  when  the  original  variables 
are  projected  onto  this  new  axis  there  will  be  minimum  overlap  of  the  groups. 
Grouping  by  electrophoretic  pattern  and  using  meristic  measures  as  variables 
enabled  an  evaluation  of  the  usefulness  of  meristics  as  group  discriminators. 
Also,  a  stepwise  procedure  determined  an  economic  subset  of  these  measures. 
Inclusion  into  the  subset  was  determined  by  an  F-statistic  based  on  a  one-way 
analysis  of  variance  test  ( Afifi  and  Azen  1 972 ) .  The  stepwise  discriminant  func- 
tion analysis  was  an  unmodified  Biomedical  Computer  Program-BMD07M 
( Dixon  1 976) .  The  program  generates  posterior  probabilities  for  group  member- 
ship. Prior  probabilities  for  each  group  member  were  determined  to  be  the 
fraction  the  group  represented  of  the  total  sample.  The  first  two  canonical 
variables  for  each  group  were  plotted  to  display  the  relationships  of  the  groups. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 
Electrophoretic  Analysis-Malate  Dehydrogenase 

All  largemouth  bass  electrophoretically  analyzed  from  Upper  Otay  Reservoir 
(69  fish)  and  Hidden  Valley  Reservoir  (114  fish)  showed  the  MM  phenotype. 
All  bass  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  FHatchery  (100  fish).  Merle  Collins 
Reservoir  (117  fish),  and  Shasta  Lake  (73  fish)  showed  the  SS  phenotype. 
Isozyme  patterns  for  fish  from  these  sources  were  consistent  irrespective  of  the 
size  of  fish  analyzed;  larval  fish  provided  patterns  identical  to  those  for  fish 
weighing  over  2.3  kg. 

Known  F,  hybrids  from  reciprocal  crosses  of  Florida  and  northern  largemouth 
bass  all  showed  the  MS  phenotype  (Figure  4). 

Fish  of  the  MS  phenotype  appeared  in  collections  from  year  classes  spawned 
1  year  after  the  introduction  of  Florida  bass  at  Folsom  Lake  and  Clear  Lake 
(Figures  5  and  9).  Similarly,  hybrid  patterns  were  found  within  2  years  at  Lake 
Isabella  (Figure  8),  within  3  years  at  New  Hogan  Reservoir  (Figure  6),  and 
within  4  years  at  Lake  Amador  (Figure  7).  By  1975,  fish  of  the  MS  phenotype 
were  well  represented  in  collections  from  all  study  waters.  In  1978,  the  final  year 
of  the  study,  fish  showing  the  MS  phenotype  constituted  over  44%  of  collections 
from  each  of  the  study  waters  (Figures  5  through  9). 


142 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


NORTHERN  f 

FLORIDA  i 

Fi   HYBRIDS 

MDH 
PATTERN 

S/S 

M/M 

ALL  M/S 

NO.  OF 
LATERAL 
LINE 
SCALES 

65 

68 

66, 68,65,67  64,66,68,66,64,68, 
65,66,67  64,69,65,62,66,66,67, 
67  68,68,65,69,63,63,66,65,71, 
70,58,65,60,61,58,66 

^=65.4 

RANGES 
58-71 
n=37 

GRAND 

MEAN= 

65.7^ 

RANdE= 
58-72^ 

N=53^ 

NO.  OF 
LATERAL 
LINE 
SCALES 

63 

72 

65,66,66,63,6771,66,6766,  67 
67, 69,69,59, 60, 72,46^47^ 
52i^ 

X=66.2^ 

RANGE  = 
59  -  72^ 
n=162^ 

MDH 
PATTERN 

S/S 

M/M 

ALL    M/S 

NORTHERN  (i 

FLORIDA  ? 

Fi  HYBRIDS 

FICURE  4.  Malate  dehydrogenase  phenotype  and  lateral  line  scale  counts  for  F,  hybrids  from 
reciprocal  crosses  of  northern  and  Florida  largemouth  bass.  ^  Abnormally  low 
counts.  ^  Does  not  include  low  counts. 


FREQUENCY    OF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


048 


LEGEND 

oS    Mo-  MM 


%    FISH  BY  PATTERN 


NO.  OF  FISH    BY  PATTERN 

NO.  OF  FISH  ANALYZED 

YEARISI   OF  COLLECTION-AGE 
subscript  =  no.  collected 

YEAR  CLASS 

1972 

2     0 


1976-3  + 


1973 


19 


24 


1976-2  + 


1974 


W 


0.39      a42       044 


fts 


A 


^ 


18  3 


25 


1975j-0+ 
1977,^-2+ 


1975 


15 


35 


46 


14 


95 


1976-0  + 


1976 


KJei 


t« 


6  28 


146 


1977-0  + 


1977 


m 


256312 


M 


100 


1978-1+ 


1978 


FIGURE     5.     Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  Folsom  Lake. 

Results  indicate  that  Florida  bass  survived  and  had  an  impact  at  each  of  the 
study  waters.  Fish  shov^ing  the  MS  or  MM  pattern  made  up  no  less  than  32% 
(Clear  Lake — 1975)  and  as  much  as  91%  (New  Hogan  Reservoir — 1977)  of 
collections  made  from  1975  through  1978.  Of  1,767  fish  examined  during  this 
period,  1,168  (66%)  showed  the  MS  or  MM  pattern  (Figures  5  through  9). 

Fish  showing  the  MS  pattern  only,  made  up  no  less  than  1 0%  ( Lake  Isabella — 
1976)  and  as  much  as  63%  (Folsom  Reservoir— 1978;  Lake  Isabella— 1978)  of 
individual  collections.  Of  1,767  fish  analyzed,  783  (44%)  showed  the  hybrid 
pattern.  The  actual  number  of  hybrid  fish  included  in  individual  collections. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


143 


however,  likely  exceeded  the  number  of  fish  showing  the  MS  pattern.  According 
to  Childers  ( pers.  commun. )  the  offspring  of  a  cross  of  two  MS  fish  should  show 
SS,  MS,  and  MM  patterns  at  a  1 :2:1  ratio,  respectively.  A  cross  of  MS  and  SS  fish 
should  yield  fish  showing  MS  and  SS  patterns  at  a  1 :1  ratio.  Similarly,  MS  crossed 
with  MM  should  yield  MS  and  MM  at  a  1 :1  ratio.  For  this  reason  it  is  impossible 
to  ascertain  the  incidence  of  hybrid  fish  in  a  population  beyond  the  F,  genera- 
tion. Hybrid  fish  from  subsequent  generations  may  show  an  SS,  MS,  or  MM 
pattern;  results  presented  in  Figures  5  through  9  almost  surely  include  hybrid  fish 
among  those  reported  as  SS  or  MM. 

Collections  of  bass  from  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir,  thought  to  contain  a  pure 
population  of  Florida  bass,  consistently  contained  fish  of  the  MS  phenotype.  One 
fish,  a  member  of  the  1973  year  class,  was  of  the  SS  phenotype  (Figure  10). 


FREQUENCY  OF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


LEGEND 
88    MS  MM 


%  FISH  BY  PATTERN 


NQ  OF   FISH    BY    PATTERN 

1    1 

NO.  OF  FISH    ANALYZED 

YEARISl  OF   COLLECT  ION -AGE 
subscript  -no.  collected 

YEAR   CLASS 

1971 

1    1 

4|0|  1 

5 

1975^    2  + 
19763-3  + 

1972 

1973 

20|  8|  1 


29 


1975,, 


1974 


0.65      0.64      0.70       0.52 


49 


32 


101726 


53 


1975,j   0+ 
19766  .  1+ 


1975 


42 


43 


19  51  52 


122 


1976   0  + 


1976 


42 


9   42  49 


100 


1977    0  + 


1977 


54 


W\ 


ISi 


22  57  27 


106 


1978-0-1 


1978 


FLORIDA    BASS    PLANTS 

■iil^t:  1      \_±tn      1         T973 

1 

FIRST   SPAWN 

..--. 

FIRST   SPAWN    OF  PROGENY 

-■"■-'.•■■■! 

1         1 

I;;::;::::::] 

FIGURE  6.       Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  New  Hogan  Reservoir. 

0.39       0.33       0.37      0.35 


FREQUENCY  OF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


LEGEND 
SS  MS  Ml 


FLORIDA    BAS.S    PI  awTS 
FIRST  SPAWN 


FIRST  SPAWN  OF  PROGENY 


^ 


FLORIDA  BASS   PLANT 


%  FISH  BY  PATTERN 


NO     OF  FISH   BY    PATTERN 

1   1 

NO.  OF  FISH  ANALYZED 

YEARISl  OF  COL  LECTION -AGE 

YEAR  CLASS 

1970 

1971 


1972 


1    1 

7|lo|  1 

18 

i9;;-3«- 

1973 

1974 

21  29  8 


58 


1975 


26|24[7 


57 


1976 


446213 


119 


1977 


t&T6 


1973 


JI: 


FIGURE     7.     Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  Lake  Amador. 


^ 


isi 


515515 


121 


1978 


144 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


FREQUENCY   OF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


LEGEND 
^«S  MM 


%FISH  BY   PATTERN 


NO.  OF  FISH   BY    PATTERN 

1    1 

NO.   OF    FISH    ANALYZED 

YEARISI  OF  COLLECTION -AGE 

YEAR   CLASS 

1972 

8    0   10 


18 


1976-}+ 


1973 


T[5TT 


14 


1976-2+ 


1974 


0.43 


20|12|14 


46 


1976-1+ 


1975 


0.33 


29 

3a(6|l7 


61 


1976-0+ 


1976 


0.41 


^ 


n 


54|49|29 


132 


1977-0+ 


1977 


0.51 


» 


m 


m 


13  2714 


54^ 


1979-1+ 


1978 


FLORIDA  BASS    PLANTS 

l-.i.i«7i:--:1   [  ia7.T  1 

FIRST    SPAWN 

■■••-'•"-•■.•.■.■.•j.i    \ — =1 

FIRST  SPAWN   OF  PROGENY 

[■^^ 

•^^^1    ^^                 1 

FIGURE     8.     Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  Lake  Isabella.'  Twenty  samples 
analyzed  by  Dr.  D.  Phiiipp  of  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey. 


Frequency  of  the  Florida  Allele  Based 
on  Malate  Dehydrogenase  Analyses 

Considering  that  the  incidence  of  the  Florida  allele  ( M )  was  0.00  in  collections 
made  at  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  and  Merle  Collins 
Reservoir,  values  recorded  for  the  study  waters  indicate  that  Florida  bass  had 
substantial  impact  at  these  waters  containing  northern  bass.  Expectedly,  there 
were  differences  in  the  incidence  of  the  Florida  allele  in  the  study  populations, 
based  on  collections  from  1975  through  1978  year  classes.  The  highest  values 
recorded,  0.65,  0.64,  and  0.70,  were  from  New  Hogan  Reservoir  fish  of  the  1 975, 
1976,  and  1977  year  classes,  respectively  (Figure  6).  Fish  from  Lake  Amador 
showed  the  most  uniform  values,  ranging  from  0.33  to  0.39  (Figure  7).  Values 
for  Clear  Lake  fish  showed  consistent  increases  from  0.1 7  in  1 975  to  0.52  in  1 978 
(Figure  9).  Values  ranged  from  0.39  in  1976  to  0.44  in  1978  at  Folsom  Lake 
(Figure  5),  and  from  0.33  in  1976  to  0.51  in  1978  at  Lake  Isabella  (Figure  8). 
Sample  sizes  for  1975  were  comparatively  small  at  both  waters. 

Comparison  of  the  study  populations  based  on  these  varying  values  is  some- 
what speculative  considering  the  many  variables  related  to  the  complex  environ- 
ments involved  and  the  following  factors  that  varied  by  water: 

(1)  Number  of  Florida  bass  planted  (Figure  11). 

(2)  Number  of  Florida  bass  planted  in  relation  to  the  number  of  northern  bass 
present. 

(3)  Size  of  Florida  bass  planted  (Figure  11). 

(4)  Surface  acreage  (Figure  11). 

(5)  Time  of  Florida  bass  plants  (Figure  11). 

(6)  Supplemental  stocking  of  northern  bass  (Figure  11). 

(7)  Morphometrv. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


145 


Consideration  of  values  obtained  in  the  final  year  of  the  study,  however, 
provides  some  measure  of  the  comparative  impact  of  Florida  bass.  Frequency 
of  the  Florida  allele  in  the  study  populations  based  on  fish  analyzed  from  the 
1978  year  class  was  0.44  at  Folsom  Lake,  0.52  at  New  Hogan  Reservoir,  0.35  at 
Lake  Amador,  0.41  at  Lake  Isabella  (1977  value  used  because  of  the  compara- 
tively small  sample  size  of  the  1978  collection),  and  0.52  at  Clear  Lake  (Figure 
11 ).  The  Lake  Amador  value,  lowest  of  the  five  populations,  was  significantly 
different  from  that  recorded  for  both  New  Hogan  Reservoir  and  Clear  Lake 
(Z  =  2.59,  p  < 0.05),  but  was  comparable  to  values  for  Folsom  Lake  (Z  =  1.36, 
p  >0.05)  and  Lake  Isabella  (Z  =  0.98,  p  >0.05).  All  other  values  were  equiva- 
lent when  compared  (Figure  11). 


FREQUENCYOF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


LEGEND 
S3  MS  MM 


%  FISH  BY  PATTERN 


NO-  OF  FISH  BY    PATTERN 

1    1 

NO.  OF  FISH  ANALYZED 

YEARIS)  OF  COLLECTION-  AGE 
8ubacript-.no.  collected 

YEAR  CLASS 

1969 

2    10 


1970 


1971 


4|1|0 

9|8|2 

5 

19 

19;5|-3^- 
1971^-  4+ 

1972 

1973 

0.17      0.27         0.36       0.52 


14|7|3 


24 


I975j-  I- 


1974 


20 


W  20  2 


70 


1975 


121111 


24 


1976 


40 


20 


Ift 


•/5|68^8 


171 


1977 


2lW'6 


7* 


107 


T57Fir; 


1978 


FLORIDA     BASS   PLANTS 

■•■i9W:-\  nrnn 

vm\-i                                                                                i 

FIRST  SPAWN 

;:".:v.d 

f:-  -1 

FIRST   SPAWN  OF  PROGENY 

.•.■.•.■■• 

^    1 :::::! 

FIGURE     9.     Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  Clear  Lake. 

0.86        0SS9 


FREQUENCYOF 

FLORIDA  ALLELE 


LEGEND 
Mo    MM 


FISH  BY  PATTERN 


NO.  OF    FISH    BY    PATTFRN 

1 

NO.  OF  FISH    ANALYZED 

YEAR  S)  OF  COLLECTION -AGE 
subscript- no.  collected 

YEAR    CLASS 

1971 

1972 


1     0    2 


1975-2+ 
1976j  3+ 


1973 


0    0    3 


1976-2+ 


1974 


29 


n 


0  14   35 


49 


1971-0  + 

1975-1  + 
21 


1975 


78 


22 


0  28102 


130 


1976-0  + 


1976 


0.85 


69 


104 


1977-0  + 


1977 


FLORIDA     BASS    PLANTS 

■  ^!^^, 

1 

FIRST    SPAWN 

■  .°;'.v''.  •  • 

1 

FIRST   SPAWN    OF  PROGENY 

.'•'■•" 

*■?■'.■ 

1 

FIGURE  10.     Results  of  malate  dehydrogenase  analyses  of  fish  from  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir. 

2—80510 


146 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


WATER 

Surface 
acreage 
(maximum 

Florida 

bass 

plants 

No.  of  fish 
planted 

Size  of 

fish 

planted 

Supplemen- 

Frequency 

95%C.l,for 

2   VALUES             1 

stocking  of 
rxjrthern 

allele  in  1978 

llorida  allele 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

FOLSOM  LAKE 
(1) 

11,450 

APR  1972 

160 

1-5/lb 

NO 

0.44 

034-0  54 

1 

- 

— 

— 

— 

— 

APR  1973 

262 

1-5/lb 

MAR«APR 
1974 

245 

1-1-^LB 

NEW 
HOGAN 
RESERVOIR 
(2) 

4,410 

OCT 1971 

990 

32/lb 

NO 

0.52 

0  42-  062 

2 

115 

— 

— 

- 

- 

JULY  &  OCT 
1972 

2,967 

5/lb 

JULY  1973 

1y430 

^%B 

LAKE 

AMADOR 

(3) 

385 

MAR  i  JULY 
1970 

259 

a75^/^^ 

NO 

0.35 

026-045 

3 

136 

259 

- 

- 

— 

OCT1973 

942 

«^/lb 

LAKE 
ISABELLA 

11  Ann 

JUNE  1972 

3,000 

~200/lb 

NO 

0.41^ 

031-  051 

4 

048 

169 

0,98 

— 

— 

(4) 

JUNE  1973 

24,000 

800/lb 

APR  1969 

136 

V,B 

YES^ 

0.52 

0.43-063 

5 

t15 

0 

2i59 

1.70 

— 

CLEAR  LAKE       43,800 

MAY  1970 

242 

Vlb 

(5) 

OCT  1971 

58 

Vlb 

FIGURE  1 1 .  Relationship  of  surface  acreage,  Florida  bass  plants,  supplemental  stocking,  and  com- 
parison of  frequency  of  Florida  allele  in  collections  made  at  the  study  waters 
in  1978.  '  A  total  of  120,000  fish  was  stocked  by  a  private  group  from  1975  through 
1978  (L.  Week,  Fishery  Biol.,  Dept.  Fish  and  Came,  pers.  commun.)  ^  1977  value  used 
due  to  the  comparatively  small  1978  sample. 

According  to  Dr.  David  Philipp  of  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey  (pers. 
commun.)  evaluation  of  mixed  populations  by  use  of  malate  dehydrogenase 
may  lead  to  overestimates  as  to  the  contribution  of  Florida  bass  genes  to  a  given 
population  of  northern  bass.  The  actual  quantitative  measurements  of  Florida 
bass  influence  at  the  study  waters  may  be  overestimated;  however,  he  is  of  the 
opinion  that  this  is  likely  a  small  and  relatively  constant  error.  Findings  by  Dr. 
Philipp  show  that  isocitrate  dehydrogenase  and  aspartate  aminotransferase  now 
provide  more  accurate  estimates.  These  enzyme  systems  will  be  required  for 
future  examinations  of  bass  populations  at  northern  California  waters  since 
northern  bass  from  states  south  of  Illinois  are  now  present  here.  Such  fish  have 
been  federally  stocked  at  military  installations  and  Indian  reservations  in  recent 
years.  The  Colorado  River,  which  has  had  a  long  and  complex  history  of  bass 
stocking  by  adjoining  states,  likely  also  contains  northern  bass  from  sources 
south  of  Illinois.  This  is  based  on  electrophoretic  and  meristic  data  collected 
from  fish  stocked  from  the  Colorado  River  area  into  ponds  at  the  Department's 
Imperial  Wildlife  Management  Area  in  the  Imperial  Valley  of  southern  California. 
Subsequent  to  the  collection  of  fish  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery, 
Merle  Collins  Reservoir,  and  Shasta  Lake,  fish  from  the  Imperial  Valley  ponds 
were  brought  to  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery.  These  fish  were  then 
marked  and  stocked  at  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  and  Coyote  Reservoir  (Santa 
Clara  County) .  Progeny  of  Imperial  Valley  fish  that  were  retained  at  the  hatchery 
were  stocked  at  East  Park  Reservoir  (Colusa  County)  and  Salt  Springs  Reservoir 
(Calaveras  County).  They  were  likely  also  included  with  other  bass  stocked  in 
1978  at  Shasta  Lake,  Biscar  Reservoir  (Shasta  County),  Mountain  Meadows 
Reservoir  (Lassen  County),  Lake  Almanor  (Plumas  County),  ponds  at  the  Oro- 
ville  Wildlife  Area  (Butte  County),  Clear  Lake,  Nicasio  Reservoir  (Marin 
County),  and  various  farm  ponds. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


147 


Electrophoretic  Analysis-Tetrazolium  Oxidase 
All  largemouth  bass  analyzed  for  tetrazolium  oxidase  from  Central  Valleys 
Warmwater  Hatchery  (100  fish),  Shasta  Lake  (68  fish),  and  Merle  Collins  Reser- 
voir (42  fish)  showed  the  MM  phenotype  (Figure  12)  as  expected  for  northern 
bass.  Of  68  fish  analyzed  from  Upper  Otay  Reservoir,  43  (63.2%)  showed  the 
MM  phenotype,  22  (32.4%)  were  MS,  and  3  (4.4%)  were  SS.  Of  83  fish 
analyzed  from  Hidden  Valley  Reservoir,  44  (53.0%)  were  MM,  36  (43.4%) 
were  MS,  and  3  (3.6%)  were  SS. 


WATER 

YEAR 
CLASS 

NUMBER  OF  FISH 
BY  PHENOTYPE 

NUMBER 
OF  FISH 
ANALYZED 

MM 

MS 

SS 

NORTHERN 

BASS 
POPULATIONS 

CENTRAL    VALLEYS 
WARMWATER    HATCHERY 

100 

0 

0 

100 

SHASTA    LAKE 

68 

0 

0 

68 

MERLE  COLLINS  RESERVOIR 

42 

0 

0 

42 

FLORIDA 
BASS 
POPULATIONS 

UPPER  OTAY  RESERVOIR 

43 

22 

3 

68 

HIDDEN  VALLEY  RESERVOIR 

44 

36 

3 

83 

STUDY 
POPULATIONS 

FOLSOM     RESERVOIR 

1974 

21 

4 

0 

25 

1976 

58 

2 

0 

60 

NEW  HOGAN   RESERVOIR 

1976 

103 

14 

1 

118 

LAKE    AMADOR 

LAITE    ISABELLA 

1975 

34 

4 

1 

39 

1976 

23 

1 

1 

25 

CLEAR  LAKE 

1973 

16 

3 

0 

19 

1974 

19 

3 

0 

22 

STUDY    POPULATIONS  COMBINED 

274 

31 

3 

308 

FIGURE  12.     Results  of  tetrazolium  oxidase  analyses  offish  from  northern  bass  populations,  Florida 
bass  populations,  and  study  populations. 


Predictably,  MM  was  the  most  frequently  found  phenotype  in  fish  analyzed 
from  the  study  populations.  Of  308  fish  examined,  274  (89.0%)  were  MM,  31 
(10.0%)  were  MS,  and  3  (1.0%)  were  SS.  Results  for  fish  from  Rancho  Seco 
Reservoir  were  comparable  to  those  for  fish  from  Upper  Otay  and  Hidden 
Valley  reservoirs.  Of  143  analyses,  81  (56.6%)  were  MM,  56  (39.2%)  were  MS, 
and  6  (4.2%)  were  SS. 


148  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

Known  Fi  hybrids  by  MDH  were  not  analyzed  for  TO;  however,  of  the  128 
MS  fish  (MDH)  from  the  study  waters  that  were  analyzed  for  TO,  109  were  MM 
and  19  were  MS. 

Considering  that  northern  or  Florida  bass  or  their  subspecific  hybrids  can 
show  the  MM  phenotype  for  tetrazolium  oxidase  (northern  bass  always  MM, 
Florida  bass  may  be  MM,  MS,  or  SS,  and  subspecific  hybrids  may  be  MM  or 
MS),  use  of  TO  for  classifying  individual  fish  has  limited  value.  This  system  is 
useful,  however,  for  determining  if  Florida  bass  or  subspecific  hybrids  are 
present  in  a  population  thought  to  contain  northern  bass  only.  In  this  regard,  the 
presence  of  the  MS  or  SS  phenotype  would  indicate  contamination.  One  would 
reasonably  expect  to  find  an  MS  phenotype  (SS  being  in  very  low  incidence 
even  in  Florida  bass  populations)  in  the  collections  from  Central  Valleys  Warm- 
water  FHatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  or  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  if  Florida  bass  or  sub- 
specific  hybrids  were  present.  For  example,  combining  TO  analyses  for  Upper 
Otay  (68  fish)  and  FHidden  Valley  reservoirs  (83  fish)  showed  that  58  fish,  or 
about  one  out  of  every  three  fish,  had  the  MS  phenotype.  Combining  the  TO 
analyses  for  fish  from  the  study  waters  (308  fish)  showed  that  31  fish,  or  about 
one  out  of  every  1 0  fish,  had  the  MS  phenotype  ( Figure  12).  Therefore,  it  would 
not  be  unreasonable  to  expect  to  find  at  least  one  MS  fish  in  the  collections  from 
Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  and  Merle  Collins  Reservoir, 
considering  the  number  of  fish  examined  from  each  source. 


Meristic  Analysis 

Results  from  discriminant  function  analysis  of  meristic  data  for  fish  of  known 
MDH  phenotypes  showed  that  meristic  values  were  not  reliable  for  classifying 
individual  fish  from  mixed  populations  as  to  Florida  (MM),  northern  (SS),  or 
hybrid  bass  (MS)  categories.  When  meristic  data  for  69  MM  fish  from  Upper 
Otay  Reservoir,  271  MS  fish  from  mixed  populations,  and  a  total  of  167  SS  fish 
from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery  and  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  were 
analyzed  as  a  whole,  a  considerable  number  of  fish  were  categorized  incorrect- 
ly. Only  32  Upper  Otay  fish  were  placed  in  the  MM  category,  while  35  were 
classified  as  MS  and  two  were  classified  as  SS  (Figure  13).  Similar  results  were 
obtained  when  a  total  of  370  MM  fish  from  Upper  Otay  and  mixed  populations, 
271  MS  fish  from  mixed  populations,  and  a  total  of  427  SS  fish  from  Central 
Valleys,  Merle  Collins,  and  mixed  populations  were  considered  as  a  whole.  Of 
370  MM  fish,  261  were  classified  MM,  83  MS,  and  26  SS.  Of  271  MS  fish,  115 
were  classified  MS,  91  MM,  and  65  SS.  Of  427  SS  fish,  369  were  classified  SS, 
57  MS,  and  one  MM.  When  69  MM  fish  (Upper  Otay)  and  167  SS  fish  (Central 
Valleys  and  Merle  Collins)  were  analyzed  together,  five  of  the  former  were 
categorized  SS  and  four  of  the  latter  were  classified  MM. 

Analysis  also  showed  that  the  lateral  line  scale  count  was  the  most  discriminat- 
ing meristic  character.  Based  on  calculated  values  of  the  F-statistic,  a  measure 
of  significant  difference  between  groups  for  the  character,  the  lateral  line  scale 
count  was  the  most  significantly  different  character  (F  =  563.0770),  followed 
by  pyloric  caeca  (50.3735),  scale  rows  around  the  caudal  peduncle  (21.2659), 
scale  rows  above  the  lateral  line  (4.3975),  scale  rows  on  the  cheek  (3.4029), 
and  scale  rows  below  the  lateral  line  (2.2009) .  For  this  reason,  data  are  provided 
for  lateral  line  scale  counts  only. 


FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  149 

CLASSIFIED    BY 

.ELECTROPHORESIS M  ERISTICS^ 


»  /69mm  upper  otay  reservoir 

507  FISH  ^271ms  mixed  populations 


MS       SS     TOTAL 

32  35  2  69 

52  183  36  271 


\yHg7         CEm-RAL  VALLEYS  W/W  HATCHERY* ►      1  20  146  167 

MERLE  COLLINS  RESERVOIR 


D  •STOmm  "PPER  otay  RESERVOIR  4 ►  261  83  26  370 

°  /  MIXED  POPULATIONS  ^ 

1,068  FISH  ^^ ^271mS     mixed  POPULATIONS    *      9'  ''^  65  2/1 

427qq   CENTRAL  valleys  VI//W/ hatchery, »•     1  57         369  427 

MERLE  COLLINS  RESERVOIR  & 


MIXED  POPULATIONS 


C  ^69mm       upper  OTAY  RESERVOIR  '- ►    64  5  69 


'MM 


236  FISH 

SS 


Nl67ec         CENTRAL  VALLEYS  W/// HATCHERY  4 *      4  163  167 


MERLE    COLLINS  RESERVOIR 


FIGURE  13.  Results  of  discriminant  function  analysis-classification  by  meristic  values  of  fish  of 
known  malate  dehydrogenase  phenotypes.  The  six  meristic  values  used  included 
number  of  1 )  scales  along  lateral  line,  2  and  3)  scale  rows  above  and  below  lateral 
line,  4)  scale  rows  around  caudal  peduncle,  5)  scale  rows  on  cheek,  and  6)  pyloric 
caeca.  A  =  507  fish  considered  as  a  whole  (MM  and  SSfish  from  Florida  and  northern 
populations  only).  B  =  1068fish  considered  as  a  whole  (MM  and  SS  fish  from  Florida, 
northern,  and  mixed  populations).  C  =  236  fish  considered  as  a  whole  (classification 
of  MM  and  SS  fish  only). 

Northern  largemouth  bass  lateral  line  scale  counts  ranged  from  59  to  68 
(x  =  63.3,  n  =  100)  for  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery  fish,  from  59  to 
69  (x  =  64.0,  n  =  129)  for  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  fish,  and  from  60  to 
69  (x  =  65.0,  n  =  73 )  for  fish  from  Shasta  Lake.  Florida  bass  counts  ranged  from 
66  to  75  (x  =  70.5,  n  =  81 )  for  Upper  Otay  Reservoir  fish,  and  from  64  to  76 
(x  =  70.2,  n  =  93)  for  fish  from  Hidden  Valley  Reservoir. 

Lateral  line  scale  counts  for  all  largemouth  bass  collected  from  the  study 
waters  following  the  introduction  of  Florida  bass  ranged  from  53  to  79 
(x  =  66.2,  n  =  1,386).  Counts  made  by  Bottroff  (1967)  on  largemouth  bass 
from  Folsom  Lake  prior  to  the  1972  introduction  of  Florida  bass  ranged  from  56 
to  69  (x  =  63.4,  n  =  223).  Post-introduction  counts  ranged  from  53  to  78 
(x  =  65.6,  n  =  559)  for  fish  collected  from  1974  through  1977  (Figure  14). 

Florida  bass  were  introduced  at  New'  Hogan  Reservoir  in  1971.  Counts  made 
prior  to  that  ranged  from  57  to  68  (x  =  63.4,  n  =  76).  Post-introduction  values 
for  fish  from  1975,  1976,  and  1977  year  classes  ranged  from  59  to  79  (x  ==  68.5, 
n  =  278)   (Figure  14). 

No  pre-Florida  bass  data  were  available  for  Lake  Amador  or  Lake  Isabella; 
however,  post-introduction  values  ranged  from  61  to  73  (x  =  66.1,  n  =  155) 
and  from  59  to  75  (x  =  67.2,  n  =  114),  respectively  (Figure  14). 

Pre-Florida  bass  introduction  counts  ranged  from  58  to  68  (x  =  63.7, 
n  =  140)  for  Clear  Lake  fish  (J.  Broadway,  M.  Fairbank,  and  S.  Morse,  Univ.  of 
California,  Davis,  unpublished  data).  Post-introduction  values  (1973  and  1975) 
ranged  from  58  to  74  (x  =  64.7,  n  =  280)   (Figure  14). 


150 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


< 

< 

d 


^0 

i§ 

98 
^^ 

Q- 

£  X 

CO     CO 

Z   O 


UJ 

"r    a 

0  0 

0 

-S 

z 

z  g 

LU 

D  0 

0 

0    TT 

UJ 

U  0 

^^^^ 

CO 

< 


X 


>- 

3 


E 

o 


c 

o 


re 


01 

c 


n3 
O) 


c 
o 


3 


>- 

u 

c 

0) 


D 
U 


FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  151 

Counts  for  known  F,  hybrids  ranged  from  58  to  72  (x  =  65.7,  n  =  53),  ex- 
cluding abnormally  low  counts  of  46,  47,  and  52  ( Figure  4) .  Values  for  fish  from 
the  study  waters  showing  the  MDFH  hybrid  pattern  ranged  from  59  to  77 
(x  =  66.9,  n  =  313). 

Scale  counts  for  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  fish  (1975  and  1976)  ranged  from  62 
to  82  (x  =  72.8,  n  =  284). 

Use  of  Meristic  Data  in  Evaluating  Study  Populations 

Electrophoretic  data  were  collected  because  meristic  data  appeared  to  be  of 
limited  value  in  meeting  the  objectives  of  this  study: 

(1)  Categorization  of  individual  fish  from  mixed  populations  would  be  dif- 
ficult because  of  overlaps  in  ranges  of  meristic  values  for  the  subspecies 
and  their  hybrids. 

(2)  FHybridization  could  probably  not  be  demonstrated  by  increases  over 
time  in  mean  meristic  values  for  study  populations  since  such  increases 
would  likely  occur  with  no  hybridization  because  of  higher  survival  by 
longer-lived,  less  vulnerable  Florida  bass. 

(3)  Hybridization  could  not  necessarily  be  demonstrated  by  a  frequency 
distribution  of  meristic  values  for  fish  sampled  from  a  mixed  population 
because  of  its  possible  similarity  to  a  distribution  postulated  for  a  compa- 
rable population  of  the  two  subspecies  spawning  independently  and  with 
differing  annual  mortality  rates. 

(4)  While  changes  in  meristic  values  may  have  provided  indications  that 
hybridization  had  occurred  (extended  ranges  and/or  unimodal  distribu- 
tion of  values,  etc.),  determination  of  the  extent  of  hybridization  was 
unlikely. 

Bailey  and  Hubbs  (1949)  reported  a  range  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  of  59 
to  69  for  northern  bass  from  the  Great  Lakes  and  the  Mississippi  River,  a  range 
of  65  to  75  for  Florida  bass  from  the  Florida  Peninsula,  and  an  overall  range  of 
58  to  76  for  apparent  hybrids  from  various  Florida  and  Georgia  waters.  Lateral 
line  scale  counts  for  fish  identified  electrophoretically  by  this  study  as  northern 
bass  ranged  from  59  to  69.  Counts  for  Florida  bass  ranged  from  64  to  76.  Counts 
for  fish  from  mixed  populations  ranged  from  53  to  78,  and  those  for  known  F^ 
hybrids  ranged  from  58  to  72.  It  is  apparent  from  these  overlapping  ranges  that 
one  cannot  expect  to  classify  individual  fish  from  mixed  populations  as  to 
subspecific  or  hybrid  categories  with  reasonable  accuracy  on  the  basis  of  a 
lateral  line  scale  count.  Similar  overlaps  occurred  for  other  scale  counts  and  for 
pyloric  caeca  counts. 

Mean  lateral  line  scale  counts  for  northern  bass  populations  reported  by  Bailey 
and  Hubbs  (1949)  ranged  from  62.6  to  64.6.  Bottroff  (1967)  reported  mean 
counts  of  61 .2  to  63.9  for  several  California  populations.  Lateral  line  scale  counts 
for  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery  fish  averaged  63.3,  and  those  for  fish 
from  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  averaged  64.0.  Fish  from  Shasta  Lake  averaged 
65.0.  While  this  mean  was  abnormally  high  for  a  northern  bass  population,  no 
individual  count  exceeded  the  range  typically  reported  for  northern  bass.  The 
mean  lateral  line  count  for  fish  collected  prior  to  introduction  of  Florida  bass  was 
63.4  at  Folsom  Lake  and  at  New  Hogan  Reservoir,  and  63.7  at  Clear  Lake.  Mean 
counts  for  fish  collected  at  the  study  waters  following  the  introduction  of  Florida 
bass  ranged  from  64.5  to  66.8  at  Folsom  Lake,  66.5  to  70.3  at  New  Hogan 
Reservoir,  and  65.8  to  66.6  at  Lake  Amador.  Post-introduction  values  were  67.7 


152  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

and  66.9  at  Lake  Isabella  and  64.4  and  65.2  at  Clear  Lake.  This  would  suggest 
that  hybridization  could  be  detected  by  an  increase  in  mean  lateral  line  count 
to  a  value  of  65  or  more.  Such  an  increase,  however,  would  likely  have  occurred 
at  the  study  waters  with  no  intersubspecific  spawning,  considering  the  differing 
annual  mortality  rates  of  0.55  for  northern  bass  and  0.25  for  Florida  bass  reported 
by  Bottroff  and  Lembeck  (1978).  Considering  that  Florida  bass  were  stocked 
into  established  populations  of  northern  bass  at  the  study  waters  at  a  ratio  of  at 
least  one  Florida  bass  for  every  50  northern  bass,  an  increase  in  the  mean  lateral 
line  scale  count  to  65  scales  for  fish  representatively  collected  from  the  study 
populations  would  likely  not  have  occurred  for  several  years.  However,  if  young 
Florida  bass  survived  at  a  disproportionate  rate  that  time  would  have  been 
substantially  reduced. 

One  might  expect  the  frequency  distribution  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  for  fish 
from  an  intergraded  population  to  show  a  unimodal  distribution  (Figure  15D). 
Conversely,  the  frequency  distribution  of  a  population  of  Florida  and  northern 
bass  spawning  independently  and  with  differing  mortality  rates  should  eventual- 
ly show  a  bimodal  distribution.  Bimodality  would  most  likely  occur  at  67,  68,  or 
69  scales,  which  are  at  the  upper  end  of  the  northern  range  and  near  the  lower 
end  of  the  Florida  range  (combining  A  and  B  of  Figure  15).  Bimodality  would 
be  most  apparent  in  populations  having  equal  numbers  of  the  two  subspecies. 
At  the  study  waters,  however,  Florida  bass  were  initially  outnumbered  by  north- 
ern bass  by  a  wide  margin.  For  this  reason,  bimodality  would  likely  not  be 
detected  in  representative  samples  for  several  years  (Figure  16). 

Figure  16  provides  frequency  distributions  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  that  one 
might  expect  to  find  if  a  yearling  population  of  15,950  northern  bass  and  319 
Florida  bass,  a  50  to  1  ratio  (a  conservative  estimate  of  the  initial  ratio  at  the 
study  waters),  was  examined  each  year  over  a  5-year  period  when:  1 )  the  two 
subspecies  were  dying  at  the  differing  rates  (0.55  for  northern  bass  and  0.25  for 
Florida  bass)  reported  by  Bottroff  and  Lembeck  (1978);  2)  within  the  respective 
groups,  no  scale  count  was  being  removed  disproportionately;  and  3)  all  fish 
were  marked  for  separation.  Northern  bass  scale  counts  were  expanded  propor- 
tionally from  the  302  counts  recorded  for  fish  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater 
Hatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  and  Merle  Collins  Reservoir.  Counts  for  fish  from  Upper 
Otay  and  Hidden  Valley  reservoirs  were  used  for  Florida  bass.  In  this  hypotheti- 
cal exercise  in  which  there  was  no  intersubspecific  spawning  and  recruited  fish 
were  not  considered,  bimodality  began  to  appear  among  the  surviving  fish  at  69 
scales  in  the  fourth  year. 

Given  the  same  initial  population,  the  frequency  distributions  of  Figure  16 
likely  also  approximate  the  scale  counts  of  fish  representatively  sampled  from 
that  population  (including  recruited  fish)  each  year  over  a  5-year  period  when: 
1 )  no  intersubspecific  spawning  occurred;  2)  the  two  subspecies  were  dying  at 
the  differing  rates  reported  by  Bottroff  and  Lembeck  (1978);  3)  survival  to 
sampling  of  young  fish  of  each  subspecies  was  comparable;  and  4)  the  incidence 
of  each  lateral  line  scale  count  for  fish  recruited  into  the  population  was  propor- 
tional to  the  incidence  of  that  count  in  the  initial  population.  Under  these 
conditions,  bimodality  could  conceivably  be  detected  as  early  as  the  fourth  year. 
If,  however,  fish  with  lateral  line  scale  counts  of  67,  68,  or  69  were  recruited  into 
a  population  at  a  disproportionate  rate,  bimodality  may  not  be  detected  and  the 
frequency  distributions  for  sampled  fish  would  likely  show  a  unimodal  distribu- 


FLORIDA  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES 


153 


I  =  COUNTS  OF  64 
OR   MORE 


X  =  70.3 
mod«  =  70 
n  =  319-1- 


58     60     62 


64     66     68     70     72      74      7$     78 

LATERAL    LINE      SCALES 


END  OF  1st  YEAR 


END  OF  3n)  YEAR 


END  OF  5th  YEAR 


5860626466687072      74      76 

LATERAL  LINE  SCALES     - 


FIGURE  15.  Frequency  distributions  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  for:  (A)  northern  bass  from  Central 
Valleys  Warmwater  Hatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  and  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  combined; 
(B)  Florida  bass  from  Upper  Otay  and  Hidden  Valley  reservoirs  combined;  (C) 
known  F,  hybrids;  and  (D)  A  +  B  +  C  (53  counts  expanded  to  300  on  a  proportional 
basis).  '  Includes  145  counts  made  by  L.  Bottroff  (unpubl.  data). 

FIGURE  16.  Frequency  distributions  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  for  an  initial  population  composed 
of  1 5,950  northern  bass  and  319  Florida  bass  ( a  50  to  1  ratio ) ,  and  applying  the  annual 
mortality  rates  of  0.55  for  northern  bass  and  0.25  for  Florida  bass  reported  by  Bottroff 
and  Lembeck  (1978)  over  a  5-year  period.  Northern  bass  counts  were  expanded 
proportionally  from  the  302  counts  recorded  for  fish  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater 
Hatchery,  Shasta  Lake,  and  Merle  Collins  Reservoir.  Counts  for  fish  from  Upper  Otay 
and  Hidden  Valley  reservoirs  were  used  for  Florida  bass. 


154  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

tion.  Inadequate  sample  size  or  sampling  error  may  also  give  frequency  distribu- 
tions falsely  suggestive  of  an  intergraded  population. 

Various  changes  in  lateral  line  scale  count  values  following  the  introduction 
of  Florida  bass  into  a  northern  bass  population  such  as  1 )  an  increase  in  mean 
count,  2)  the  occurrence  of  individual  values  that  exceed  the  combined  ranges 
of  the  two  subspecies,  and  3)  the  unimodality  of  a  frequency  distribution  of 
values  may  suggest  that  intersubspecific  spawning  has  occurred.  These  indica- 
tors do  not  provide,  however,  a  measure  of  the  extent  of  hybridization  or  an 
insight  into  the  makeup  of  the  resultant  population. 

Compilation  of  meristic,  as  well  as  electrophoretic  data  for  study  populations, 
for  populations  of  Florida  and  northern  bass,  and  for  known  Fi  hybrids  provided 
an  opportunity  to  assess  the  value  of  meristics  for  detecting  hybridization.  In  this 
regard,  the  mode  value  of  lateral  line  scale  counts  for  fish  of  a  mixed  population 
where  a  comparatively  few  Florida  bass  were  stocked,  appeared  to  provide 
greater  insight  than  other  indicators.  The  mode  value  of  a  distribution  of  lateral 
line  scale  counts  is  typically  63  or  64  for  a  northern  bass  population  (Bottroff 
1967  and  Figure  15A),  and  70  for  a  Florida  bass  population  (Bottroff  1967  and 
Figure  15B).  Mixed  populations  typically  exhibit  a  mode  ranging  from  65  to  70 
(Bottroff  1967).  Consistent  with  this,  a  hypothetical  population  composed  of 
equal  numbers  of  northern  bass,  Florida  bass,  and  known  Fi  hybrids  had  a  mode 
of  66  (Figure  15D).  While  distributions  for  fish  from  the  study  waters  were 
generally  multimodal  because  of  comparatively  small  sample  sizes  (Figure  14) 
it  is  apparent  that  the  mode  for  larger  samples  from  these  waters  would  fall 
within  the  aforementioned  range.  For  example,  combining  collections  from 
Folsom  Lake  (n  =  559)  gives  a  mode  of  65.  Combining  collections  from  New 
Hogan  Reservoir  (n  =  278)  gives  a  mode  of  69.  Also,  a  comparison  of  the 
percentage  of  fish  with  counts  of  64  or  greater  in  a  northern  bass  distribution 
(darkened  portion  of  Figure  15A)  with  the  percentage  of  fish  with  those  counts 
in  the  hypothetical  mixed  population  (darkened  portion  of  Figure  15D)  and  in 
the  study  populations  (darkened  portions  of  Figure  14  post-Florida  bass)  indi- 
cates that  the  mode  value  for  most  study  water  collections  lies  between  65  and 
70.  The  percentage  of  values  64  or  greater  in  a  northern  population  distribution 
is  usually  about  equal  to  or  less  than  the  percentage  of  values  less  than  64 
( Bottroff  1 967  and  Figure  1 5A ) .  Contrastingly,  the  percentage  of  fish  with  values 
of  64  or  greater  in  distributions  of  the  hypothetical  mixed  population  and  actual 
collections  made  at  the  study  waters  exceeds  the  percentage  of  fish  with  values 
less  than  64.  Bottroff's  (1967)  distributions  were  equivalent  in  this  respect. 

Population  Sampling 
Two  major  factors  related  to  sampling  could  have  affected  the  evaluations: 

(1 )  A  correlation  between  isozyme  pattern  and  susceptibility  to  electrofish- 
ing. 

( 2 )  Differences  in  the  makeup  of  collections  between  years  being  a  reflection 
of  sampling  error  rather  than  changes  within  the  populations. 

Most  fishery  workers  involved  with  comparative  tests  report  that  Florida  bass 
are  considerably  more  wary  than  northern  bass  (Zolczynski  and  Davies  1976; 
Rieger,  Summerfelt,  and  Gebhart  1978).  For  this  reason,  one  would  expect 
Florida  bass  to  be  more  difficult  to  capture  by  electrofishing.  Consistent  with  the 
findings  of  Zolczynski  and  Davies  (1976)  that  Florida  bass  ceased  feeding  and 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  155 

moved  into  deeper  water  in  response  to  fishing,  Florida  bass  should  move  from 
shallow  water  into  deeper  water  in  reaction  to  an  approaching  electrofishing 
boat  with  its  associated  bright  lights  and  noisy  generator  (or  alternator) .  I  found, 
however,  that  adult  Florida  bass  were  no  more  difficult  to  capture  at  Hidden 
Valley  Reservoir  and  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  (mostly  Florida  bass  present),  than 
northern  bass  were  at  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  and  other  waters.  If  Florida  and 
northern  bass  differ  in  susceptibility  to  electroshocking  the  age  group  least  likely 
to  demonstrate  this  would  probably  be  young-of-the-year  fish.  Most  fish  collect- 
ed at  the  study  waters  were  young-of-the-year.  While  these  fish  ranged  consider- 
ably as  to  size,  no  correlation  was  found  between  a  given  MDH  pattern  and  size. 
Considering  the  incidence  of  the  three  MDH  patterns  in  collections  from  the 
study  waters,  over  time  and  when  comparing  one  water  with  another,  I  do  not 
believe  that  MM,  MS,  or  SS  fish  showed  appreciably  different  susceptibilities  to 
the  electrofishing  gear. 

It  is  possible  that  sampling  error  was  responsible  for  some  differences  in  the 
makeup  of  collections  between  year  classes.  There  are  indications,  however, 
that  through  rigid  adherence  to  collection  guidelines  previously  listed,  these 
differences  were  mostly  a  reflection  of  actual  changes  in  the  population  makeup 
rather  than  changes  falsely  represented  through  sampling  error.  For  example,  the 
incidence  of  fish  showing  the  three  MDH  isozyme  patterns  in  collections  from 
Lake  Amador  remained  relatively  constant  from  1975  through  1978  (Figure  7). 
Appreciable  sampling  error  would  have  caused  noticeable  differences  between 
two  or  more  of  these  years. 

Rancho  Seco  Reservoir 

A  small  pond  at  the  eventual  site  of  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  was  chemically 
treated  to  eradicate  all  fish  life  prior  to  inundation  of  the  reservoir  basin.  It  is 
likely  that  this  treatment  was  successful  and  that  northern  bass  were  not  present 
when  Florida  bass  were  introduced  in  1971.  The  presence  of  one  fish  of  the 
northern  bass  MDH  phenotype  among  fish  analyzed  from  the  1973  year  class, 
however,  showed  that  the  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  population  included  northern 
bass  alleles.  It  is  possible  that  a  small  number  of  northern  bass  were  inadvertently 
pumped  into  the  reservoir  from  the  nearby  Folsom  South  Canal  or  were  trans- 
planted by  anglers  from  another  source. 

While  no  SS  (northern  bass)  phenotypes  were  found  in  collections  from  the 
1975,  1976,  and  1977  year  classes,  MS  (hybrid)  phenotypes  were  represented 
( Figure  10).  It  is  probable  that  the  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  population  contained 
hybrid  fish  at  the  time  it  was  utilized  as  a  source  for  some  of  the  study  waters 
(Figure  1 ).  The  incidence  of  hybrid  fish  in  groups  stocked  from  the  reservoir 
from  1 971  through  1 974  was  likely  low,  however,  considering  that  comparatively 
few  northern  bass  were  initially  involved.  An  indication  that  Rancho  Seco  Reser- 
voir contained  few  hybrids  in  the  early  years  comes  from  a  comparison  of  the 
frequency  of  the  Florida  allele  in  1978  at  New  Hogan  Reservoir  (0.52)  and  Clear 
Lake  (0.52).  New  Hogan  Reservoir  was  the  only  study  water  that  received  fish 
from  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir  only.  Clear  Lake  was  planted  from  Upper  Otay  and 
Hidden  Valley  reservoirs.  Also,  it  is  unlikely  that  the  high  incidence  of  the  Florida 
allele  at  New  Hogan  Reservoir  in  1975  (0.65),  1976  (0.64),  and  1977  (0.70) 
would  have  occurred  if  an  appreciable  number  of  hybrids  were  present  in  plants 
made  there  from  Rancho  Seco  Reservoir. 


1  56  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Maladaptive  Genes 

Apparent  intolerance  of  4°  C  by  Florida  bass  reported  by  Johnson  (1975) 
prompted  concern  that  maladaptive  genes  possibly  related  to  this  intolerance 
would  be  transmitted  to  northern  bass  populations  through  Florida  bass  intro- 
duction. Quoting  from  Johnson: 

"Low  temperature  stress  was  suspected  as  the  cause  of  poor  survivorship  of 
Florida  bass  in  the  Ashland  ponds  and  Phillips  Lake.  As  a  preliminary  test, 
three  Florida  and  three  northern  bass  were  subjected  to  rapid  temperature 
decreases  (acclimated  to  2rc  for  48  hours  and  then  exposed  to  a  reduction 
in  temperature  from  21°  to  4°  within  12  hours).  Florida  bass  mortality  was 
100%  in  the  two  replicates  over  a  7-day  test  period.  Only  one  of  the  six 
northern  largemouth  bass  died.  Although  the  experimental  design  was  limited, 
the  results  point  to  a  greater  sensitivity  for  Florida  largemouth  bass  than  for 
the  northern  subspecies.  A  subsequent  investigation  of  this  question  utilized 
a  large  outside  tank  which  held  20  Florida  and  20  northern  largemouth.  The 
fish  were  acclimated  at  15°C  (59°F)  and  then  subjected  to  gradually  decreas- 
ing temperatures.  Mortality  was  similar  in  the  two  subspecies  until  the  ninth 
day  at  a  temperature  of  5°C  (4rF).  The  temperature  was  held  at  4°C  (39°F) 
for  5  days.  Fourteen  days  after  the  inception  of  the  experiment,  all  Florida  bass 
were  dead  while  only  three  northern  bass  had  died.  While  these  data  do  not 
prove  winter  mortality  in  ponds  is  caused  by  low  temperature,  it  does  indicate 
a  difference  in  temperature  tolerance  between  the  two  subspecies.  The  Florida 
bass  is  much  more  sensitive  to  a  rapid  decline  in  temperature." 

Results  of  these  tests  suggest  that  Florida  bass  are  more  sensitive  to  a  rapid 
decline  in  temperature  than  are  northern  bass.  These  tests  should  have  included, 
however,  control  fish  of  both  subspecies  held  in  comparable  tanks  at  optimal 
temperature.  My  experience  with  Florida  bass  has  been  that  they  initially  are 
more  wary  and,  as  a  result,  more  stressed  by  handling  than  are  northern  bass. 
For  this  reason,  one  might  expect  that  Florida  bass,  disproportionately  stressed 
before  entering  comparative,  stressful  tests  with  northern  bass,  would  show  a 
higher  mortality.  Colby  ( 1 973 )  cautioned  against  extrapolating  laboratory  results 
to  explain  natural  events.  He  cited  laboratory  tests  of  temperature  tolerance  of 
alewives,  Alosa  pseudoharengus,  and  endemic  species  that  showed  differential 
mortalities  of  alewives  at  temperatures  <3°C,  suggesting  that  they  were  likely 
vulnerable  to  the  low  temperatures  which  occur  in  the  Great  Lakes.  The  fact  that 
alewives  were  captured  in  trawls  in  the  Great  Lakes  in  waters  colder  than  2°C 
suggested  that  captivity  may  reduce  low  temperature  tolerance. 

Several  points  should  be  considered  in  relating  Johnson's  findings  to  Florida 
bass  in  northern  California  waters: 

( 1 )  It  is  unlikely  that  temperature  declines  at  rates  comparable  to  those  used 
by  Johnson  would  occur  at  California's  low-  and  mid-elevation  reser- 
voirs. 

(2)  Florida  bass  survived  outdoor  temperatures  (including  freezing  condi- 
tions in  which  only  aeration  of  the  holding  tanks  prevented  them  from 
freezing  over)  for  two  winters  (1977-78,  10  fish;  1978-79,  13  fish)  at  the 
Department's  Field  Station. 

(3)  No  mortalities  occurred  among  61  F,  hybrids  held  in  outdoor  tanks  at  the 
Field  Station  during  winter  1978-79. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  157 

(4)  Considering  the  obvious  genetic  impact  of  the  comparatively  few  Florida 
bass  stocked  at  the  study  v^aters,  it  is  unlikely  that  they  or  their  progeny 
suffered  appreciable  wintertime  mortalities. 

(5)  No  unusual  wintertime  dieoffs  of  bass  at  the  study  waters  were  reported 
by  fishery  workers,  marina  operators,  or  anglers. 

Results  of  this  study  indicate  that  considerable  variation  exists  among  fish  of 
the  intergraded  populations.  Of  particular  interest  here  are  variant  forms  of 
enzymes  related  to  temperature  compensation.  The  enzyme  reactions  which 
exhibit  the  highest  degree  of  temperature  compensation  are  primarily  those 
involved  in  generating  the  energy  "currency"  (ATP,  NADH,  etc. )  needed  by  the 
cells  at  all  times  (Hochachka  and  Somero  1973).  Malate  dehydrogenase  is  such 
an  enzyme.  According  to  Hochachka  and  Somero  (1971)  for  an  organism 
experiencing  changes  in  habitat  temperature  over  daily  or  hourly  time  spans,  it 
would  seem  advantageous  to  have  two  or  more  variants  of  a  given  enzyme  in 
its  tissues  which,  by  acting  together,  could  promote  thermally  independent 
enzyme  function  over  a  wider  range  of  temperatures  than  would  be  possible  if 
only  a  single  form  of  the  enzyme  were  present. 

Performance  Capabilities  of  Fish  of  Intergraded  Populations 
Malate  dehydrogenase  isozyme  patterns  used  to  identify  northern  and  Florida 
bass,  for  which  some  performance  capabilities  have  been  described,  have  lim- 
ited use  in  predicting  the  performance  of  individual  fish  of  intergraded  popula- 
tions. A  fish  showing  a  Florida  bass  enzyme  pattern,  for  example,  may  or  may 
not  spawn  earlier,  grow  faster,  live  longer,  or  demonstrate  other  attributes  as- 
signed to  Florida  bass.  The  performance  capability  of  a  fish  is  ultimately  deter- 
mined by  its  biochemical  makeup  (Hochachka  and  Somero  1973).  While  MDH, 
an  enzyme  involved  in  energy  transfer,  is  a  part  of  that  makeup,  isozyme  patterns 
of  MDH  do  not  necessarily  indicate  the  behavioral,  anatomical,  or  physiological 
characteristics  of  fish.  Results  of  this  study  showed,  however,  that  the  heterozy- 
gote  of  Florida  bass  x  northern  bass  possesses  MDH  isozymes  of  both  parents 
plus  an  additional  isozyme  found  in  neither  parent.  Similarly,  Dr.  Philipp  (pers. 
commun.)  identified  heterozygous  patterns  for  two  additional  enzymes,  iso- 
citrate  dehydrogenase  and  aspartate  aminotransferase,  in  Lake  Isabella  fish  of  the 
1978  year  class.  Several  workers  have  reported  variant  isozymes  for  several 
enzymes  in  hybrids  resulting  from  inter-  and  intraspecific  crosses  (Goldberg 
1966;  Aspinwall  and  Tsuyuki  1968;  Bailey  and  Wilson  1970;  Whitt,  Childers,  and 
Wheat  1971;  Metcalf,  Whitt,  and  Childers  1972;  Wheat,  Whitt,  and  Childers 
1973;  Whitt,  Childers,  and  Cho  1973;  Whitt  et  al.  1973;  Avise  and  Smith  1974). 
Umbarger  (1961 )  proposed  that  additional  isozymes  provide  auxiliary  routes 
for  energy  transfer.  According  to  Ayala  (1978)  the  manufacture  of  slightly 
variant  proteins  by  the  heterozygote  may  enable  it  to  adapt  to  a  broader  range 
of  conditions  and  individuals  that  are  heterozygous  at  a  number  of  loci  are 
usually  stronger  and  reproductively  more  successful  than  individuals  homozy- 
gous at  a  large  number  of  loci.  Several  workers  have  reported  that  progeny  from 
crosses  between  species  or  inbred  lines  show  increased  vigor  termed  heterosis 
(Hubbs  and  Hubbs  1930;  Shull  1948;  Whitt  et  al.  1973;  Wheat,  Childers,  and 
Whitt  1974;  Ayala  1978).  Utter,  Hodgins,  and  Allendorf  (1974)  pointed  out  that 
studies  of  interspecific  variation  can  be  extended  through  studies  of  species 
hybrids  because  of  the  greater  amount  of  genetic  variation  that  exists  between 


158  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

any  two  species  than  that  which  exists  within  either  of  them.  Ayala  ( 1 978)  stated 
that  a  population  that  has  considerable  variation  may  be  hedged  against  future 
changes  in  the  environment. 

Results  of  this  study  indicate  variability  of  characteristics  among  fish  of  the 
intergraded  populations  in  two  major  ways.  Firstly,  the  range  of  meristic  values 
for  fish  sampled  from  the  mixed  populations  typically  equalled,  and  in  some 
cases  overlapped,  the  combined  ranges  for  the  subspecies  involved.  Fish  of 
given  MDhH  isozyme  patterns  had  quite  variable  meristic  values,  particularly 
those  collected  in  the  latter  years  of  the  study.  For  example,  some  fish  showing 
the  northern  bass  pattern  had  counts  as  high  as  75,  while  some  fish  showing  the 
Florida  bass  pattern  had  counts  as  low  as  62.  Meristic  values  for  MS  fish  typically 
showed  the  greatest  variability.  Lateral  line  scale  counts  of  MS  fish  collected  in 
1 976  from  Folsom  Lake  ranged  from  60  to  76.  Similarly,  MS  fish  from  New  FHogan 
Reservoir  in  1976  had  counts  ranging  from  60  to  78.  It  is,  therefore,  reasonable 
to  assume  that  if  variability  exists  between  isozyme  pattern  and  meristic  values 
this  variability  could  extend  to  other  characteristics. 

Secondly,  since  fish  of  the  study  populations  exhibited  one  of  three  MDH 
isozyme  patterns,  and  some  fish  from  Lake  Isabella  demonstrated  heterozygous 
patterns  for  two  other  enzymes,  it  is  likely  that  fish  of  the  intergraded  populations 
exhibit  variant  forms  of  other  enzymes.  The  possible  combinations  resulting  from 
this  are  considerable. 

It  is  reasonable  to  assume  that  the  current  largemouth  bass  populations  at  the 
study  waters  possess  a  wider  spectrum  of  performance  capabilities  than  that 
previously  present.  This  is  consistent  with  the  original  intent  of  introducing 
Florida  bass  which  were  reported  to  grow  faster,  live  longer,  spawn  earlier,  and 
be  more  difficult  to  catch  than  northern  bass.  Inclusion  of  these  and  other  traits 
likely  yielded  populations  composed  of  individuals  ranging  from  those  showing 
mostly  Florida  bass  traits  to  those  showing  mostly  northern  bass  traits.  This 
variability  would  be  particularly  advantageous  in  the  reservoir  setting  where 
heavy  angling  pressure,  water  level  manipulation,  competition  of  prey  species 
with  small  bass,  and  other  factors  work  against  the  maintenance  of  a  bass 
population. 

Management  Implications 
Indications  of  the  management  implications  of  Florida  bass  introduction  come 
from  Bottroff  and  Lembeck  (1978)  in  relating  their  findings  at  San  Diego  County 
reservoirs  where  Florida  bass  were  introduced  into  established  populations  of 
northern  bass: 

. . .  populations  with  Florida-like  characteristics  are  resistant  to  overharvest  by 
anglers.  The  mean  size  of  bass  caught  and  the  incidence  of  trophy  specimens 
has  increased  in  reservoirs  where  Florida  bass  have  been  established.  In- 
creased bass  yields  were  associated  largely  with  the  development  of  hybri- 
dized   populations    although    one    impoundment    containing    bass    with 
Florida-like  characteristics  provides  angling  of  exceptional  quality. 
Pre-  and  post-Florida  bass  introduction  census  data  were  not  available  for  the 
study  waters.  There  are  indications,  however,  that  Florida  bass  had  a  positive 
impact  at  some  of  these  waters.  According  to  R.  Lockhart,  Sr.  (Operator,  Lake 
Amador  Resort,  pers.  commun.)  bass  fishing  has  been  excellent  at  Lake  Amador 
in  recent  years.  In  spring  1978  anglers  caught  over  100  largemouth  bass  weighing 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  159 

between  3.2  kg  and  5.9  kg.  During  the  first  9  months  of  1979,  anglers  caught  over 
100  bass  weighing  between  3.2  kg  and  4.9  kg.  Lockhart  pointed  out  that  his 
records  include  only  the  catches  of  anglers  who  voluntarily  stop  at  the  resort 
headquarters  prior  to  departing. 

B.  Burke  ( Marina  Owner,  New  Hogan  Reservoir,  pers.  commun. )  reports  that 
largemouth  bass  fishing  has  been  good  at  the  reservoir  in  recent  years.  Highlight- 
ing catches  made  during  the  first  9  months  of  1 979  were  four  bass,  each  weighing 
over  4.5  kg. 

In  1976  L.  Week  (Fishery  Biologist,  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  com- 
mun.) verified  the  weight  of  a  4.6  kg  largemouth  bass,  establishing  a  new  record 
weight  for  bass  at  Clear  Lake.  According  to  Week,  bass  fishing  has  improved 
considerably  at  the  lake  since  early  1978,  after  more  than  a  decade  of  poor 
fishing.  He  does  not  relate  this  to  the  heavy  supplemental  stocking  of  northern 
bass  conducted  at  the  lake  for  several  years  by  a  private  group.  Electrofishing 
surveys  directed  at  assessing  the  survival  of  these  fish,  mostly  fingerlings,  have 
yielded  very  low  returns.  For  example,  the  marked  fingerlings  (110,000)  stocked 
in  July  1979  made  up  only  3.8%  of  young-of-the-year  bass  collected  one  month 
later.  Week  also  reports  that  largemouth  bass  reproduction  has  increased  con- 
siderably. Electrofishing  surveys  in  August  1978  and  1979  yielded  123  and  243 
young-of-the-year  per  kilometre,  respectively. 

Loss  of  habitat  in  the  form  of  underwater  trees  and  brush  is  thought  to  be 
responsible  for  the  decline  in  largemouth  bass  catches  at  Folsom  Lake,  which 
began  in  the  early  1960's.  Since  then,  smallmouth  bass,  M.  dolomieui,  have 
dominated  bass  catches  (Pelzman,  Rapp,  and  Rawstron  1980).  No  information 
was  obtained  that  would  indicate  that  this  trend  was  reversed  by  the  introduc- 
tion of  Florida  bass.  In  1965  largemouth  bass  constituted  only  about  3%  of  the 
sport  catch  at  Lake  Isabella  (Hayden  1966).  No  information  was  obtained  that 
would  suggest  that  Florida  bass  substantially  improved  this  situation.  While  in  the 
long  term,  the  introduction  of  Florida  bass  may  increase  bass  catches  at  Folsom 
Lake  and  Lake  Isabella,  it  is  perhaps  unrealistic  to  expect  Florida  bass  to  marked- 
ly improve  bass  fishing  at  waters  where  conditions  are  such  that  established 
northern  bass  populations  are  providing  only  marginal  fishing. 

Results  of  this  study  and  of  the  study  at  San  Diego  County  reservoirs  ( Bottroff 
and  Lembeck  1978)  showed  that: 

(1 )  There  is  considerable  overlap  in  the  spawning  periods  of  northern  and 
Florida  bass,  and  intersubspecific  spawning  will  likely  occur  when  the 
two  are  present  in  the  same  water. 

(2)  Introduction  of  Florida  bass  provides  a  method  for  reducing  the  high 
harvest  rates  typically  recorded  for  northern  bass  populations  in  Califor- 
nia. 

(3)  Anglers  may  catch  fewer  bass  following  the  introduction  of  Florida  bass; 
however,  the  mean  size  of  bass  in  the  catch  is  greater. 

(4)  The  incidence  of  trophy-sized  bass  increased  at  most  waters  where  Flori- 
da bass  were  introduced. 

For  these  reasons,  consideration  should  be  given  to  stocking  Florida  bass  into 
northern  bass  populations  at  additional,  selected  northern  California  waters. 
Also,  intergraded  populations  should  serve  as  a  source  for  stocking  at  newly 
created  reservoirs  and  for  restocking  dewatered  reservoirs. 


160  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
Robert  R.  Rawstron  was  instrumental  in  getting  this  study  underway  and 
provided  helpful  advice  during  its  term.  William  F.  Childers  of  the  Illinois  Natural 
History  Survey  provided  information  necessary  to  carry  out  the  electrophoretic 
analyses.  His  willingness  to  provide  guidance,  particularly  in  the  early  stages  of 
the  study,  is  most  appreciated.  Robert  V.  Pollard  of  the  Biostatistical  Unit, 
Department  Planning  Branch,  carried  out  the  discriminant  function  analyses,  and 
prepared  the  brief  description  of  the  method.  Stephen  A.  Rapp  contributed 
considerably  toward  completion  of  the  study  through  his  attention  to  detail  and 
enthusiasm  toward  all  phases  of  the  work.  David  B.  Hohler,  Lucy  G.  Williams, 
and  Bruce  G.  Trotter  made  valuable  contributions  to  the  project  through  their 
attention  to  accuracy  in  handling  the  often  tedious  meristic  work  and  in  carrying 
out  other  assignments.  Julie  M.  Cullen  prepared  the  figures  and  helped  organize 
the  data  into  their  final  form.  Michael  H.  Fairbank,  Mary  E.  Bacon,  David  P. 
Drake,  William  C.  Robinson,  Susan  L.  Vandermeer,  Prudence  Silger,  Dennis  D. 
Waterhouse,  Robert  W.  Sneddon,  Vida  B.  Wong,  Wayne  K.  Hubbard,  Dale  K. 
Hoffman,  Paul  F.  Ogasawara,  and  Katharine  Shotwell  also  made  significant 
contributions.  The  intersubspecific  spawning  of  Florida  and  northern  bass  at  the 
Field  Station  was  accomplished  largely  through  the  help  of  Michael  D.  Cochran 
and  Donald  F.  Estey,  who  shared  their  considerable  knowledge  of  bass  culture. 
Cochran  also  provided  northern  bass  from  Central  Valleys  Warmwater  Hatch- 
ery. Lawrence  J.  Bottroff  collected  fish  from  Upper  Otay  Reservoir  and  provided 
information  on  the  history  of  Florida  bass  plants.  William  F.  Van  Woert  provided 
fish  from  Shasta  Lake.  Larry  E.  Week  and  Charles  W.  Marshall  made  the  1978 
year  class  collections  from  Clear  Lake  and  Lake  Isabella,  respectively.  Janice  M. 
Rhinehart  typed  the  manuscript  draft.  The  manuscript  was  reviewed  by  Charles 
E.  von  Geldern,  Jr.,  David  P.  Philipp,  Robert  V.  Pollard,  Earle  W.  Cummings, 
David  A.  Jessup,  Kenneth  F.  Levine,  and  M.  Ralph  Carpenter.  Charlene  B.  Gage 
typed  the  final  copy. 

REFERENCES 

Addison,  ).  H.,  and  S.  L.  Spencer.  1971.  Preliminary  evaluation  of  three  strains  of  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus 
salmoides  (Lacepede),  stocked  in  ponds  in  south  Alabama.  Proc.  25th  An.  Conf.  Southeast,  Assoc.  Came  Fish 
Comm.  pp.  366-374. 

Afifi,  A.  A.,  and  S.  P.  Azen.  1972.  Statistical  analysis — a  computer  oriented  approach.  Academic  Press.  New  York 

and  London.  366  p. 
Aspinwall,  N.,  and  H.  Tsuyuki.  1968.  Inheritance  of  muscle  proteins  in  hybrids  between  the  redside  shiner 

Richardsonius  balteatus  and  the  peamouth  chub  Mylocheilus  caurinum.  Can.,  Fish,  Res.  Bd.,  J.,  25  (7)  :1 317- 

1322. 

Avise,  J.  C,  and  M.  hi.  Smith.  1974.  Biochemical  genetics  of  sunfish.  II.  Genetic  similarity  between  hybridizing 

species.  The  American  Naturalist,  108  (962):458-472. 
Ayala,  F.  A.  1978.  The  mechanism  of  evolution.  Scientific  American,  239(16):56-69.  S.  1978. 

Bailey,  G.  S.,  and  A.  C.  Wilson,  1970.  Multiple  forms  of  supernatant  malate  dehydrogenase  in  salmonid  fishes.  J. 

of  Biol.  Chem.,  245(22):5927-5940. 
Bailey,  R.  M.,  andC.  L.  Hubbs.  1949.  The  black  basses  (Micropterus)  of  Florida  with  a  description  of  a  new  species. 

Univ.  Mich.,  Mus.  of  ZooL,  Occas.  Papers,  516:40  p. 


FLORIDA  LARCEMOUTH  BASS  ELECTROPHORETIC  STUDIES  161 

Bottroff,  L. ).  1967.  Intergradation  of  Florida  bass  in  San  Diego  County.  M.  S.  Thesis.  San  Diego  State  College,  San 

Diego,  California.  131  p. 
Bottroff,  L.  ).,  and  M.  E.  Lembeck.  1978.  Fishery  trends  in  reservoirs  of  San  Diego  County,  California,  following 

the  introduction  of  Florida  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus  salmoides  floridanus.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  64  ( 1 ) :  4-23. 
Bryan,  C.  F.  1964.  Growth  and  systematic  relationships  of  Micropterus  punctulatus  (Rafinesque)  using  merlstic 

traits  and  serum  electrophoresis.  Ph.D.  Thesis,  Univ.  Louisville,  Kentucky.  184  p. 

1969.  Variation  in  selected  meristic  characters  of  some  basses,  Micropterus.  Copeia,  1969,  2:  370-373. 

Buchanan,  J.  P.  1968.  A  meristic  and  morphometric  comparison  of  Arkansas  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus  sal- 
moides salmoides  (Lacepede),  and  the  Florida  subspecies,  Micropterus  salmoides  floridanus  (Lesueur).  M. 

S.  Thesis.  LJniv.  of  Arkansas,  Fayetteville,  Arkansas.  45  p. 
1973.  Separation  of  the  subspecies  of  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus  salmoides  salmoides,  and  M.  s. 

floridanus  and  intergrades  by  use  of  meristic  characters.  Proc.  27th  Ann.  Conf.  Southeast.  Assoc.  Game  Fish 

Comm.  pp.  608-619. 
Chew,  R.  L.  1975.  The  Florida  largemouth  bass.  Pages  450-^58  in  H.  Clepper,  ed.  Black  bass  biology  and 

management.  Nat.  Symp.  Biol.  Mgmt.  Centrar.  Basses.  Sport  Fishing  Inst.  Washington,  D.  C.  534  p. 
Colby,  P.  J.  1973.  Response  of  the  alewives,  Alosa  pseudoharengus,  to  environmental  change.  Pages  163-196  in 

W.  Chavin,  ed.  Responses  of  fish  to  environmental  change.  Charles  C.  Thomas,  Publisher.  Springfield,  Illinois: 

459  p. 
Childers,  W.  F.  1975.  Bass  genetics  as  applied  to  culture  and  management.  Pages  362-372  in  H.  Clepper,  ed.  Black 

bass  biology  and  management.  Nat.  Symp.  Biol.  Mgmt.  Centrar.  Basses,  Sport  Fishing  Inst.  Washington  D.  C. 

534  p. 
Dixon,  W.  ).  1976.  Biomedical  computer  programs.  University  of  California  Press.  Berkeley.  773  p. 
Goldberg,  E.  1966.  Lactate  dehydrogenase  of  trout:  Hybridization  in  vivo  and  in  vitro.  Science,  151:  1091-1093. 
Gottlieb,  L.  D.  1971.  Gel  electrophoresis:  New  approach  in  the  study  of  evolution.  BioScience,  21:  (18):  939-944. 
Hart, ).  S.  1952.  Geographical  variations  of  some  physiological  and  morphological  characters  in  certain  freshwater 

fish.  Univ.  Toronto  Biol.  Ser.,  60:  1-79. 
Hayden,  R.  P.  1966.  Estimated  angler  use  and  harvest,  Isabella  Reservoir,  Kern  County,  California.  Calif.  Fish  Game, 

Inland  Fish.  Admin.  Rep.  No.  66-7,  11  p.  (mimeo.) 
Hochachka,  P.  W.,  and  G.  N.  Somero.  1971.  Biochemical  adaptation  to  the  environment.  Pages  99-156  in  W.  S. 

Hoar  and  D.  ).  Randall,  eds.  Fish  Physiology.  Academic  Press.  New  York.  559  p. 

1973.  Strategies  of  biochemical  adaptations.  W.  B.  Saunders  Co.,  Philadelphia.  358  p. 

Hubbs,  C.  L.,  and  L.  C.  Hubbs.  1930.  Increased  growth  in  hybrid  sunfishes.  Papers  Michigan  Acad.  Sci.  Arts  Letters 

13:  291. 
Hubbs,  C.  L.,  and  K.  F.  Lagler.  1949.  Fishes  of  the  Great  Lakes  region.  Bull.  No.  26.  Cranbrook  Institute  of  Science. 

Bloomfield  Hills,  Michigan.  186  p. 

Johnson,  D.  L.  1975.  A  comparison  of  Florida  and  northern  largemouth  bass  in  Missouri,  Ph.D.  Thesis,  Univ.  of 
Missouri.  Columbia,  Missouri.  1 11  p. 

Metcalf,  R.  A.,  G.  S.  Whitt,  and  W.  F.  Childers.  1972.  Inheritance  of  esterases  in  the  white  crappie  (Pomoxis 

annularis),  black  crappie  (P.  nigromaculatus)  and  their  F,  and  Fj  interspecific  hybrids.  Anim.  Blood  Grps. 

Biochem.  Genet.,  3:  19-33. 
Pelzman,  R. ).,  S.  A.  Rapp,  and  R.  R.  Rawstron.  1980.  Mortality  and  survival  of  tagged  smallmouth  bass,  Micropterus 

dolomieui,  at  Merle  Collins  Reservoir,  California.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  66(1):  31-35. 
Rieger,  P.  W.,  R.  C.  Summerfelt,  and  G.  E.  Gebhart.  1978.  Catchabiiity  of  northern  and  Florida  largemouth  bass 

in  ponds.  Prog.  Fish-Cult.  40(3):  94-97. 
Sasaki,  S.  1961.  Introduction  of  Florida  largemouth  bass  into  San  Diego  County.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  Inland  Fish. 

Admin.  Rep.  No.  61-11,  6  p. 
Shebley,  W.  H.  1917.  History  of  the  introduction  of  food  and  game  fishes  into  the  waters  of  California.  Calif.  Fish 

Game,  3(1):  3-12. 
Shull,  G.  H.  1948.  What  is  "heterosis?"  Genetics  33:  439. 
Umbarger,  H.  E.  1961.  Quoted  in.  J.  H.  Wilkinson.  1970.  Isoenzymes.  J.  B.  Lippincott  Co.  Philadelphia.  369  p. 

Umbarger  not  seen. 

Utter,  F.  M.,  and  F.  W.  Allendorf.  1977.  Determination  of  the  breeding  structure  of  steelhead  populations  through 
gene  frequency  analysis.  Pages  44-54  in  J.  J.  Hassler  and  R.  R.  VanKirk,  eds.  Genetic  implications  of  steelhead 
management.  Coop.  Fish.  Res.  Unit.  Spec.  Rep.  77-1.  57  p. 


162  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

Utter,  F.  M.,  H.  O.  Hodgins,  and  F.  W.  Allendorf.  1974.  Biochemical  genetic  studies  of  fishes:  potentialities  and 
limitations.  Pages  213-238  in  D.  C.  Malins  and  J.  R.  Sargent,  eds.  Biochemical  and  biophysical  perspectives 
in  marine  biology.  Academic  Press.  London,  New  York,  and  San  Francisco.  Vol.  1.  J 

Wheat,  T.  E.,  W.  F.  Childers,  and  C.  S.  Whitt.  1974.  Biochemical  genetics  of  hybrid  sunfish:  differential  survival  ' 

of  heterozygotes.  Biochem.  Genet.  11(3);  205-219. 

Wheat,  T.  E.,  C.  S.  Whitt,  and  W.  F.  Childers.  1973.  Linkage  relationships  of  six  enzyme  loci  in  interspecific  sunfish 
hybrids  (genus  Lepomis) .  Genetics,  74:  343-350. 

Whitt,  G.  S.,  W.  F.  Childers,  and  P.  L.  Cho.  1973.  Allelic  expression  at  enzyme  loci  in  an  intertribal  hybrid  sunfish. 
J.  Hered.,  64:  55-61. 

Whitt,  G.  S.,  W.  F.  Childers,  J.  Tranquilli,  and  M.  Champion.  1973.  Extensive  heterozygosity  at  three  enzyme  loci 
in  hybrid  sunfish  populations.  Biochem.  Genet.,  8(1):  55-72. 

Whitt,  G.  S.,  W.  F.  Childers,  and  T.  E.  Wheat.  1971.  The  inheritance  of  tissue-specific  lactate  dehydrogenase 

isozymes  in  interspecific  bass  (Micropterus)  hybrids.  Biochem.  Genet.,  5:  257-273. 
Zolczynski,  S.  ).,  Jr.,  and  W.  D.  Davies.  1976.  Growth  characteristics  of  the  northern  and  Florida  subspecies  of 

largemouth  bass  and  their  hybrid,  and  a  comparison  of  catachibility  between  the  subspecies.  Am.  Fish.  Soc, 

Trans.,  105(2):  240-243. 


BLACK  BASS  POPULATION  DYNAMICS  163 

Calif.  Fish  and  Came  66  ( 3 ) :  1 63-1 7 1 

EXPLOITATION,  NATURAL  MORTALITY,  AND  SURVIVAL 

OF  SMALLMOUTH  BASS  AND  LARGEMOUTH  BASS  IN 

SHASTA  LAKE,  CALIFORNIA  ^ 

WILLIAM  F.  VAN  WOERT 

California  Department  of  Fish  and  Ganne 

627  Cypress  Avenue 

Redding,  CA     96001 

To  obtain  information  on  mortaility  and  survival  of  black  bass  in  Shasta  Lake,  $5 
reward  trailer  tags  were  attached  to  smallmouth  bass,  Micropterus  dolomieui,  in 
1973  and  1975  and  to  largemouth  bass,  M.  salmoides,  in  1975. 

First-year  exploitation  of  203  to  356  mm  (8  to  14  in.)  smallmouth  bass  tagged  in 
1973  was  0.68,  natural  mortality  was  0.24,  and  survival  was  0.08.  First-year  exploitation 
of  254-  to  305-mm  (10-  to  12-in.)  smallmouth  bass  tagged  in  1975  was  0.70,  natural 
mortality  was  0.28,  and  survival  was  0.02.  First-year  exploitation  of  254-  to  406-mm 
(10-  to  16-in.)  largemouth  bass  tagged  in  1975  was  0.50,  natural  mortality  0.28,  and 
survival  0.22. 

First-year  exploitation  of  both  species  probably  was  lower  than  that  indicated  by 
tag  returns  since  anglers  were  known  to  release  some  small  bass  after  removing  the 
tag.  Survival  of  both  species  may  have  been  underestimated  since  high  turbidity 
levels  in  1974  and  the  beginning  of  a  2-year  drought  in  1976  may  have  reduced  angler 
use  and/or  success. 

High  exploitation  of  smallmouth  bass  in  Shasta  Lake  is  the  result  of  heavy  angling 
pressure  and  high  vulnerability  of  young  smallmouth  bass  to  natural  baits.  This  high 
exploitation  appears  to  be  responsible  for  the  large  population  of  small  smallmouth 
bass  in  Shasta  Lake. 

INTRODUCTION 

Fishery  management  efforts  at  Shasta  Lake  have  centered  primarily  on  the 
stocking  of  salmonids  large  enough  to  utilize  the  large  population  of  threadfin 
shad,  Dorosoma  petenense,  (Weidlein  1971 ),  but  a  substantial  warmwater  fish- 
ery is  also  present.  Largemouth  bass  were  introduced  in  1948  and  smallmouth 
bass  in  1952.  Largemouth  bass  fishing  was  excellent  in  the  1950's  and  early 
1960's,  but  more  recently,  largemouth  bass  fishing  has  declined.  Smallmouth 
bass  have  become  the  most  frequently  caught  warmwater  species  (Weidlein 
1971 ).  In  1973,  smallmouth  bass  outnumbered  largemouth  bass  in  the  catch  by 
about  13  to  1   (Healey,  MS9). 

Weidlein  (1971)  noted  a  decline  in  both  total  catch  and  catch/h  of  small- 
mouth bass  in  Shasta  Lake  from  1968  to  1969  and  recommended  that  the  fishery 
be  closely  examined  to  see  if  this  species  was  being  overharvested.  Creel  checks 
conducted  in  1968  and  1969  (Weidlein,  unpubl.  data)  and  1972  and  1973  (Van 
Woert,  unpubl.  data)  showed  that  the  mean  length  of  smallmouth  bass  in  the 
catch  ranged  from  274  to  287  mm  ( 1 0.8  to  1 1 .3  in. ) .  During  these  4  years,  64.3% 
to  74.5%  of  the  smallmouth  bass  in  the  catch  were  under  305  mm  (12  in.). 
Relatively  few  smallmouth  bass  larger  than  356  mm  (14  in.)  entered  the  catch 
or  were  found  during  electrofishing  surveys. 

Studies  by  Rawstron  (1967),  Rawstron  and  Hashagen  (1972),  and  Rawstron 

"  Accepted  for  publication  February  1980.  Parts  of  this  study  were  performed  as  part  of  Dingell-Johnson  project 
California  F-34-R,  "Experimental  Warmwater  Reservoir  Management",  supported  by  Federal  Aid  to  Fish 
Restoration  funds. 


164  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

and  Reavis  (1974)  showed  that  largemouth  bass  were  heavily  exploited  in  some 
California  waters;  however,  mortality  and  survival  of  smallmouth  bass  have 
received  little  attention  in  California.  Rawstron's  (1967)  findings  also  suggested 
that  the  harvest  of  smallmouth  bass  might  be  as  high  or  higher  than  that  of 
largemouth  bass  in  Folsom  Lake. 

As  part  of  a  program  designed  to  collect  the  basic  biological  information 
needed  to  develop  a  management  plan  for  warmwater  fishes,  smallmouth  bass 
were  tagged  in  Shasta  Lake  in  1973  and  both  smallmouth  and  largemouth  bass 
tagged  in  1975  to  determine  exploitation,  natural  mortality,  and  survival  rates. 
Smallmouth  bass  were  tagged  in  1975  to  obtain  comparable  estimates  of  mortal- 
ity and  survival  for  254-  to  305-mm  (10-  to  12-in.)  smallmouth  and  largemouth 
bass  in  the  Pit  River  Arm  of  Shasta  Lake  and  for  comparison  with  smallmouth 
estimates  obtained  in  1973  in  the  Sacramento  River  Arm  of  Shasta  Lake.  The 
tagging  studies  would  provide  the  information  needed  to  evaluate  current  an- 
gling regulations,  particularly  the  bag  limit  and  possible  need  for  a  minimum 
length  limit.  This  report  summarizes  the  results  of  the  1973  and  1975  tagging 
studies  and  discusses  some  future  management  possibilities  for  black  bass  in 
Shasta  Lake. 


DESCRIPTION  OF  SHASTA  LAKE 

Shasta  Lake  is  located  on  the  Sacramento  River  11  km  (7  miles)  upstream 
from  Redding,  Shasta  County,  California  (Figure  1).  Completed  in  the  early 
1940's,  this  reservoir  is  operated  by  the  U.S.  Water  and  Power  Resource  Service 
for  irrigation,  power  generation,  and  flood  control. 

Shasta  Lake  has  three  long,  narrow  arms  named  for  its  major  tributaries;  the 
Sacramento,  McCloud,  and  Pit  Rivers.  At  full  pool  the  Lake  has  a  surface  eleva- 
tion of  325  m  (1,067  ft),  impounds  5,551  hm^  (4.5  million  acre-ft)  of  water, 
covers  11,947  ha  (29,500  acres),  and  has  587  km  (365  miles)  of  shoreline. 
Maximum  water  storage  is  generally  reached  about  May  and  summer  draw- 
down begins  by  early  June. 

Surface  water  temperatures  range  from  about  10°C  (50°F)  in  winter  to  27°C 
(80°F)  in  summer.  Thermal  stratification  takes  place  usually  in  June.  Lake  margins 
have  mostly  moderately  steep  to  steep  slopes,  with  very  little  vegetation  in  the 
fluctuation  zone. 

Shasta  Lake  is  open  year-round  to  fishing  for  all  species.  Daily  bag  limit  during 
the  study  was  five  black  bass,  with  no  minimum  length  limit.  Boat  anglers  have 
good  access  to  the  Lake  from  numerous  public  boat  launching  ramps  and 
privately-owned  resorts.  A  relatively  small  portion  of  the  shore  is  accessible  by 
road  for  shore  fishing. 

METHODS 
Tagging  studies  were  designed  to  study  each  major  arm  of  the  Lake  separately 
because  of  Shasta  Lake's  large  size.  Smallmouth  and  largemouth  bass  were 
tagged  by  length  groups  and  returns  analyzed  by  length  groups  and  age  classes 
in  an  effort  to  determine  an  optimum  length  limit  by  evaluating  the  effects  of 
incremental  increases  in  minimum  length  on  maximum  yield.  All  bass  were 
collected  with  an  electrofishing  boat  usually  operated  within  3  m  (9.8  ft)  of  the 
shore  and  in  water  under  2  m  (6.6  ft)  deep.  Pulsating  direct  current  was  used. 


BLACK  BASS  POPULATION  DYNAMICS 


165 


FIGURE   1.     Shasta  Lake  showing  areas  where  black  bass  were  tagged  in  1973  and  1975. 


166  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

All  electrofishing  was  done  at  night  during  March,  April,  and  May. 

In  1973,  electrofishing  was  conducted  along  156  km  (97  miles)  of  shoreline 
in  the  Sacramento  River  Arm  in  an  effort  to  tag  203-  to  356-mm  (8-  to  14-in.) 
smallmouth  bass. 

In  1975,  electrofishing  was  conducted  along  208  km  (129  miles)  of  shoreline 
in  the  Pit  River  Arm  in  an  effort  to  tag  254-  to  406-mm  ( 1 0-  to  1 6-  in. )  largemouth 
bass  and  254-  to  305-mm  (10-  to  12-in.)  smallmouth  bass. 

Smallmouth  bass  larger  than  356  mm  ( 1 4  in. )  were  not  tagged  in  1 973  because 
previous  bass  tagging  studies  in  California  suggested  that  too  few  large  bass 
would  be  tagged  to  give  significant  returns  after  the  second  year.  Early  electro- 
fishing in  1975  indicated  that  few  largemouth  bass  under  254  mm  (10  in.)  were 
available  for  tagging  while  largemouth  bass  356  to  406  mm  (14  to  16  in.)  were 
fairly  abundant.  Only  254-  to  305-mm  (10-  to  12-in.)  smallmouth  bass  were 
tagged  in  1975  because  of  limited  reward  tag  funds. 

As  the  electrofishing  boat  moved  along  the  shoreline,  stunned  bass  were 
netted,  measured  to  the  nearest  2.54  mm  (0.1  in.),  tagged,  and  a  scale  sample, 
for  use  in  aging  fish,  taken  near  the  tip  of  the  pectoral  fin.  Stunned  bass  generally 
recovered  in  less  than  5  minutes  and  were  released  as  soon  as  they  appeared 
to  be  recovered.  An  effort  was  made  to  release  tagged  bass  close  to  where  they 
had  been  captured. 

All  bass  were  tagged  with  trailer  tags.  The  method  of  attachment  was  de- 
scribed by  Nicola  and  Cordone  (1969).  Tags  used  in  this  study  were  16-mm 
(Vs-in.)  long,  6-mm  (y4-in.)  wide,  0.8-mm  (.030-in.)  thick,  and  made  of  laminat- 
ed green  vinyl  plastic.  Tags  had  a  number  and  $5  REWARD  on  one  side  and 
instructions  for  returning  the  tag  on  the  other  side.  Tag  frame  and  link  were  made 
of  0.3-mm  (.012-in.)  diameter  soft  stainless  steel  wire. 

Bass  caught  from  zero  through  365  days  from  the  date  of  tagging  were  consid- 
ered first-year  returns.  Bass  caught  from  366  to  730  days  and  731  to  1,095  days 
after  the  date  of  tagging  were  considered  second-  and  third-year  returns,  respec- 
tively. The  computation  of  mortality  and  survival  rates  follow  Ricker  (1958). 

Age  determinations  were  made  by  counting  annuli  on  scale  impressions  made 
on  cellulose  acetate  strips  with  the  aid  of  a  binocular  microscope  and  an  Eber- 
bach  scale  projector. 

RESULTS 
Smallmouth  Bass — 1973 

Between  8  March  and  25  April  1973,  530  smallmouth  bass  were  tagged  in  the 
Sacramento  Arm  of  Shasta  Lake.  Anglers  returned  a  total  of  391  ( 73.8% )  of  these 
tags  within  3  years.  Only  first-  and  second-year  tag  returns  were  used  in  calcula- 
tions of  mortality  and  survival  because  muddy  water  in  1 974  may  have  adversely 
affected  fishing  success.  Since  no  tags  were  returned  during  the  fourth  year,  tag 
returns  were  considered  complete.  First-year  exploitation  for  all  length  groups 
combined  amounted  to  0.68,  natural  mortality  was  0.24,  and  survival  from  the 
first  to  the  second  year  was  0.08  (Table  1 ). 

When  calculated  for  25.4-mm  (1-in.)  length  groups,  first-year  exploitation 
increased  from  0.59  to  0.79  for  bass  203  mm  (8  in.)  to  279  mm  (11  in.)  and 
decreased  from  0.79  to  0.52  for  fish  279  mm  (11  in.)  to  356  mm  (14  in.)  (Table 


BLACK  BASS  POPULATION  DYNAMICS 


167 


.1 ) .  A  chi-square  test  of  homogeneity  showed  a  significant  difference  in  exploita- 
tion by  length  at  the  5%  level  (X'  =  18.78;  d.f.  =  5;  p<0.01 ). 

Analysis  by  age  class  showed  that  younger  smallmouth  bass  were  exploited 
at  higher  rates  than  older  fish  (Table  2).  First-year  exploitation  amounted  to  0.72 
for  Age  II,  0.58  for  Age  III,  and  0.47  for  Age  IV  fish.  Length  at  any  given  age  was 
highly  variable.  Age  II  smallmouth  bass  ranged  from  208  to  307  mm  (8.2  to  12.1 
in.)  and  averaged  254  mm  (10.0  in.).  Age  III  fish  ranged  from  221  to  350  mm 
(8.7  to  13.8  in.)  and  averaged  305  mm  (12.0  in.).  Age  IV  smallmouth  bass  were 
incompletely  represented  in  the  study  since  only  fish  under  356  mm  (14  in.) 
were  tagged. 


TABLE 

1.     Exploita 

tion,  Natl 

jral  Mor 

talitv,  and 

1  Survival  ( 

of  Tagg 

ed  Smallmouth  Bass 

by  Length 

Croups 

in  1973  at  Shasta  Lake. 

Number  of  tags 

Foi 

■k  Length 
tagging 

Number 
tagged 

returned 

First-year 
exploitation 

Natural 
mortality 

Annual 

at 

First 

Second 

Third 

survival  * 

(mm) 

1973 

year 

year 

year 

Total 

(u) 

(v) 

(s) 

203-228  , 

44 

26 

2 

_ 

28 

0.59 

0.34 

0.07 

229-253  . 

156 
133 

109 
105 

9 

4 

1 

118 

110 

0.70 
0.79 

0.22 
0.17 

0.08 

254-279  . 

0.04 

28(^305  . 

67 

47 

3 

1 

51 

0.70 

0.24 

0.06 

30^330  . 

67 

41 

4 

- 

45 

0.61 

0.30 

0.10 

331-356 , 

63 

33 

6 

- 

39 

0.52 

0.30 

0.18 

Total 530  361  28 

Mean _  _  _ 

'  Based  on  ratio  of  second-year  to  first-year  returns. 


391 


0.68 


0.24 


0.08 


TABLE  2.     Exploitation,  Natural  Mortality,  and  Survival  of  Tagged  Smallmouth  Bass  by  Age 
Classes  in  1973  at  Shasta  Lake. 


Ill 

Number 

tagged 

1973 

Number  of  tags 
returned 

Total 

First-year 
exploitation 

(u) 

Natural 
mortality 

(v) 

Annual 

Age 

First       Second 
year         year 

Third 
year 

survival  * 
(s) 

II 

...       254 
...      305 

346 

70 
45 

250            16 
41               6 
21               3 

1 
1 

48 

24 

0.72 
0.58 
0.47 

0.21 
0.27 
0.40 

0.07 

Ill 

0.15 

IV  t 

0.14 

Total  -  461  X         312  25  2  339 

*  Based  on  ratio  of  second-year  returns  to  first-year  returns. 

t  Age  group  incompletely  sannpled  because  bass  over  356  mm  (14.0  in.)  were  not  tagged. 

X  Scales  in  69  samples  could  not  be  aged. 


Snnallnnouth  Bass — 1975 
Between  11  March  and  9  May  1975,  200  smallmouth  bass  were  tagged  in  the 
Pit  River  Arm  of  Shasta  Lake.  Anglers  returned  a  total  of  1 43  (71 .5% )  of  the  tags 
within  2  years  after  tagging  (Table  3).  Since  no  tags  were  returned  during  the 
third  year,  tag  returns  were  considered  complete.  Total  first-year  exploitation 
was  0.70,  natural  mortality  was  0.28,  and  survival  from  the  first  to  the  second 
year  was  0.02.  Mortality  and  survival  rates  by  age  class  were  not  calculated  for 
this  group  of  fish  because  of  the  narrow  length  range  of  fish  tagged. 


168 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


TABLE  3.     Exploitation,  Natural  Mortality,  and  Survival  of  Tagged  Smallmouth  Bass  by  Length 
Groups  in  1975  at  Shasta  Lake. 

Number  of 


Fork  length 

at  tagging 

(mm) 

Number 

tagged 

1975 

tags 
returned 
First       Second 
year          year 

254-279.. 
280-305.. 

100 

100 

73 
68 

2 

Total 


First-year      Natural       Annual 
exploitation  mortality    survival* 

(u)  (v)  (s) 


73  0.73  0.27  0.0 

70  0.68  0.29  0.03 

Total  200  141  2  143 

Mean _  _  _  -  0.70  0.28  0.02 

*  Based  on  ratio  of  second-year  to  first-year  returns. 

Largemouth  Bass — 1975 

Between  11  March  and  9  May  1975,  461  largemouth  bass  were  tagged  in  the 
Pit  River  Arm  of  Shasta  Lake.  Anglers  returned  a  total  of  309  (67.0%)  tags  within 
5  years  after  tagging.  Only  first-  and  second-year  tag  returns  were  used  in 
calculations  of  mortality  and  survival  because  of  possible  changes  in  fishing  use 
and/or  success  during  the  1 976-77  drought.  Total  first-year  exploitation  amount- 
ed to  0.50,  natural  mortality  was  0.28,  and  survival  was  0.22  (Table  4). 

A  chi-square  test  of  homogeneity  showed  no  significant  difference  in  exploita- 
tion by  length  groups  at  the  5%  level  (X'  =  3.06;  d.f.  =  5;  p  =  -0.69). 

Natural  mortality  showed  considerable  variation  among  length  groups,  rang- 
ing from  0.15  for  fish  331  to  356  mm  (13  to  14  in.)  to  0.35  for  fish  306  to  330 
mm  (12  to  13  in.)   (Table  4). 


TABLE  4. 

Fork  Length 

at  tagging 

(mm) 


Exploitation,  Natural  Mortality  and  Survival  of  Tagged  Largemouth  Bass  by  Length 
Groups  in  1975  at  Shasta  Lake. 


Number 

tagged 

1975 


First 
year 


Number  of  tags  returned 


Second 
year 


Third 
year 


Fourth 
year 


First-       Natural     Annual 

Fifth  year      mortality  survival  * 

year       Total  exploitation     (v)  (s) 


254-279 68  38  4  3  -  1  46  0.56  0.34  0.10 

280-305 100  51  10  3  -  1  65  0.51  0.29  0.20 

306-330 100  52  7  1  1  3  64  0.52  0.35  0.13 

331-356 67  31  12  4  -  1  48  0.46  0.15  0.39 

357-381  72  33  9  3  1  -  46  0.46  0.27  0.27 

382-406 54  23  9  6  1  1  40  0.43  0.18  0.39 

Total 461  228  51  20  3  7  309 1        0.50 

Mean  _______  _  o.28  0.22 

*  Based  on  ratio  of  second-year  to  first-year  returns. 
t  Returns  through  January  1980. 

Analysis  by  age  class  showed  a  0.51  and  0.50  first-year  exploitation  for  Age 
II  and  Age  III  largemouth  bass,  respectively  (Table  5).  Age  IV  and  V  fish  were 
incompletely  represented  in  the  study  because  only  fish  under  406  mm  (16  in.) 
were  tagged.  Some  small  Age  II  fish  may  not  have  been  included  in  the  study 
since  fish  under  254  mm  (10  in.)  were  not  tagged. 

Age  II  largemouth  bass  ranged  from  254  to  353  mm  (10.0  to  13.9  in.)  and 
averaged  300  mm  (11.8  in.)  in  length.  Age  III  largemouth  bass  ranged  from  300 
to  401  mm  (11.8  to  15.8  in.)  and  averaged  358  mm  (14.1  in.). 


BLACK  BASS  POPULATION  DYNAMICS  169 

TABLE  5.     Exploitation,  Natural  Mortality,  and  Survival  of  Tagged  Largemouth  Bass  by  Age 
Classes  in  1975  at  Shasta  Lake. 

Mean    Number     Number  of  tags  returned  First-      Natural    Annual 

length     tagged      First     Second    Third    Fourth     Fifth  year     mortality  survival  * 

Age       (mm)       1975        year       year      year      year      year       Total  exploitation     (v)  (s) 


II 

300 

271 

139 

24 

10 

1 

6 

180 

0.51 

0.32 

0.17 

Ill 

358 

110 
43 

55 
15 

14 
8 

5 

4 

1 
1 

1 

75 
29 

0.50 
0.35 

0.25 
0.12 

0.25 

IV  t 

0.53 

vt 

- 

2 

1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

Total -  426 1       210  46  19  3  7  285 

•  Based  on  ratio  of  second-year  returns  to  first-year  returns. 

t  Age  group  incompletely  sampled  because  bass  over  406  mm  (16.0  in.)  were  not  tagged. 

X  Scale  samples  from  35  fish  could  not  be  aged. 


DISCUSSION 

Exploitation  rates  of  smallmouth  bass  in  Shasta  Lake  appear  to  be  nnuch  higher 
than  those  reported  by  Coble  (1975)  for  northern  lake  populations  of  this 
species. 

Annual  fishing  mortality  rates  compiled  by  Coble  (1975)  (assumed  by  the 
author  to  be  "m"  as  defined  in  Ricker  1958)  show  fishing  mortalities  of  28  to 
35  for  the  Great  Lakes  (Latta  1963,  Fry  1964,  and  White  1970),  35%  for  Oneida 
Lake  (Forney  1972)  and  38%  for  Lake  Opeongo  (Christie  1957).  Annual  fishing 
mortality  (m)  of  smallmouth  bass  in  Shasta  Lake,  computed  for  fish  tagged  in 
1973,  was  85%.  However,  this  figure  may  be  an  over-estimate  since  in  order  to 
obtain  an  accurate  estimate  of  annual  fishing  mortality,  fishing  effort  and  catcha- 
biiity  should  remain  constant  during  the  study  period.  In  the  case  of  smallmouth 
bass  tagged  in  1973,  effort  was  down  by  31%  in  1974  as  compared  to  1973, 
(USDA  1973-1977)  with  vastly  different  water  conditions.  During  the  spring  of 
1973,  water  was  relatively  clear,  while  in  the  spring  of  1974  the  water  was  turbid 
because  of  large  inflows  during  the  winter.  Also,  the  number  of  smallmouth  bass 
observed  in  the  catch  during  1974  was  down  27%  over  1973  (Healey,  MS). 
Creel  census  effort  each  year  was  comparable. 

An  annual  expectation  of  death  from  fishing  for  smallmouth  bass  tagged  in 
1973  (first-year  exploitation,  u)  of  68%  was  a  more  accurate  estimate  of  fishing 
mortality,  and  still  indicated  that  exploitation  of  smallmouth  bass  in  Shasta  Lake 
was  considerably  higher  than  that  reported  for  northern  populations. 

First-year  exploitation  of  largemouth  bass  (50%)  in  Shasta  Lake  was  similar 
to  that  reported  for  other  California  waters.  Exploitation  of  largemouth  bass  was 
40%  in  Folsom  Lake  (Rawstron  1967),  49%  in  Merle  Collins  Reservoir  (Raw- 
stron  and  Hashagen  1972),  and  47%  and  58%  in  Folsom  Lake  and  Lake  Berry- 
essa,  respectively  (Rawstron  and  Reavis  1974).  These  authors  consider 
exploitation  rates  over  0.50  to  be  excessive  for  black  bass  (R.  R.  Rawstron,  Fish 
Mgmt  Supervisor,  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun. ) .  In  small  Missouri 
lakes  and  ponds,  a  40%  harvest  of  adult  largemouth  bass  appeared  to  be  the 
maximum  that  could  be  allowed  and  still  maintain  a  balanced  sunfish  population 
and  adequate  growth  and  recruitment  of  bass  (Graham  1974,  Ming  1974,  and 
Redmond  1974).  Preliminary  results  of  tagging  studies  in  progress  at  Shasta  Lake 
show  that  many  anglers  release  largemouth  bass,  particularly  fish  under  305  mm 


170  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

(12  in.),  although  there  is  no  minimum  length  limit.  Since  no  adjustment  of 
exploitation  rates  was  made  for  fish  released  at  Shasta  Lake  and  apparently  was 
not  made  for  earlier  tagging  studies  conducted  on  largemouth  bass  in  California, 
the  true  rate  of  exploitation  of  largemouth  bass  populations  studied  in  California 
waters  was  probably  somewhat  less  than  that  computed  from  tag  returns. 

About  60%  of  the  anglers  checked  at  Shasta  Lake  between  April  and  Septem- 
ber 1973,  fishing  for  species  other  than  trout,  were  found  to  be  using  natural  baits 
(Van  Woert,  unpubl.  data).  These  anglers  caught  71%  of  the  smallmouth  bass 
and  9%  of  the  largemouth  bass  in  the  creel  samples.  Anglers  who  used  only 
crickets  for  bait  caught  42%  of  the  smallmouth  bass  and  3%  of  the  largemouth 
bass  sampled,  while  those  using  artificial  lures  caught  78%  of  the  largemouth 
bass  observed.  In  recent  years,  overexploited  bass  populations  in  many  Califor- 
nia waters  have  been  managed  by  the  imposition  of  a  305-mm  ( 1 2-in. )  minimum 
length  limit. 

A  minimum  length  limit  may  not  be  an  efficient  means  of  reducing  exploitation 
of  smallmouth  bass  at  Shasta  Lake  because  the  extensive  use  of  natural  baits  may 
result  in  excessive  hooking  mortality.  Pelzman  (1978)  observed  a  56%  mortality 
of  largemouth  bass  less  than  305  mm  (12  in.)  as  a  result  of  esophageal  hooking; 
however,  fish  hooked  in  other  parts  of  the  mouth  experienced  little  mortality. 

First-year  exploitation  of  largemouth  bass  (0.53)  between  254  and  305  mm 
(10  and  12  in.)  tagged  in  1975  was  substantially  lower  than  that  for  smallmouth 
bass  (0.70)  of  the  same  size  tagged  the  same  year.  Some  of  this  difference  in 
exploitation  may  be  caused  by  the  difference  in  vulnerability  of  the  two  species 
to  the  different  angling  techniques  noted  above.  Hooking  mortality  probably 
would  not  be  a  critical  factor  in  imposing  a  length  limit  on  largemouth  bass  since 
this  species  is  caught  mainly  (78%)  on  artificial  lures  (Van  Woert,  unpubl. 
data). 

While  high  exploitation  resulted  in  a  small  average  size  of  smallmouth  bass 
in  the  catch  at  Shasta  Lake,  recruitment  generally  was  good  and  smallmouth  bass 
were  abundant  during  most  years.  Since  smallmouth  bass  were  relatively  easy 
to  catch  on  natural  bait,  they  helped  satisfy  a  high  angling  demand  during  the 
spring  and  summer  months.  Any  attempt  to  improve  the  quality  of  smallmouth 
bass  fishing  by  protecting  smallmouth  bass  until  they  reach  larger  sizes  may 
require  restrictions  on  bait,  as  well  as  a  minimum  length  limit. 

Although  smallmouth  and  largemouth  bass  may  be  overexploited  in  Shasta 
Lake,  there  does  not  appear  to  be  a  serious  imbalance  between  bass  and  sunfish 
populations.  Electrofishing  surveys  indicate  that  recruitment  of  bluegill,  Lepomis 
machrochirus,  and  green  sunfish,  L.  cyanellus,  is  low.  Analysis  of  stomach  con- 
tents indicate  that  bass  in  Shasta  Lake  rely  more  heavily  upon  threadfin  shad  as 
a  food  source  than  upon  other  sunfishes.  Examination  of  scales  has  shown  that 
black  bass  appear  to  be  achieving  normal  growth  patterns  in  Shasta  Lake 
(Charles  E.  von  Geldern,  Jr.,  Sr.  Fish.  Biologist,  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  pers. 
commun.). 

Electrofishing  surveys  conducted  at  Shasta  Lake  indicated  that  recruitment  of 
largemouth  bass  is  low.  To  increase  production  and  survival  of  young 
largemouth  bass  in  Shasta  Lake,  bass  spawning  and  nursery  habitat  should  be 
restored.  If  efforts  to  enhance  shelter  for  largemouth  bass  are  not  feasible,  the 


BLACK  BASS  POPULATION  DYNAMICS  171 

combination  of  low  recruitment,  good  growth,  and  high  exploitation  strongly 
suggests  that  a  minimum  length  limit  would  provide  better  fishing  for  largemouth 
bass. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
I  wish  to  thank  Don  Weidlein  for  his  assistance  in  planning  the  study,  help  in 
the  field,  and  review  of  the  manuscript.  Charles  E.  von  Geldern,  Jr.  had  impres- 
sions made  of  the  scales  and  provided  the  initial  age  determinations.  Robert  R. 
Rawstron,  Alan  Baracco,  and  Darlene  Osborne  made  valuable  suggestions  re- 
garding preparation  of  this  report  and  reviewed  the  manuscript.  Terrance  P. 
Healey,  David  A.  Hoopaugh,  and  various  temporary  employees  helped  with  the 
tagging  and  electrofishing  operations. 


REFERENCES 

Christie,  W.  J.  1957.  The  bass  fishery  of  Lake  Opeongo.  M.  A.  thesis.  Univ.  of  Toronto,  77  p. 

Coble,  D.  W.  1975.  Smallmouth  bass.  Pages  21-33  in  Henry  Clepper,  ed.  Black  bass  biology  and  management. 
Sport.  Fish.  Inst. 

Forney,  J.  L.  1 961 .  Growth,  movements,  and  survival  of  smallmouth  bass  ( Micropterus  dolomieuf)  in  Oneida  Lake, 
New  York.  N.Y.  Fish  Came  J.,  8(2):  88-105. 

1972.  Biology  and  management  of  smallmouth  bass  in  Oneida  Lake,  New  York.  N.Y.  Fish  Came  J.,  19(2): 

132-154. 

Fry,  F.  E. ).  1964.  Anglers  arithmetic.  Pages  55-71  in\.  R.  Dymond,  ed.  Fish  and  Wildlife.  T.  H.  Best  Printing  Co., 
Toronto,  Canada,  214  p. 

Graham,  L.  K.  1974.  Effects  of  four  harvest  rates  on  pond  fish  populations.  Pages  29-38  in  symposium  on 
overharvest  and  management  of  largemouth  bass  in  small  impoundments.  N.C.  Div.,  Amer.  Fish.  Soc.  Spec. 
Pub.  (3). 

Healey,  T.  P.  1977.  A  review  of  Whiskeytown  Lake  fishery  management  from  1963-1975.  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and 

Came,  Inland  Fish.  Adm.  Rep.  77-2,  24  p.  (mimeo). 
Latta,  W.  C.  1963.  The  life  history  of  the  smallmouth  bass,  Micropterus  d.  dolomieui,  at  Waugoshance  Point,  Lake 

Michigan.  Mich.  Dept.  Conserv.  Inst.  Fish.  Res.  Bull.  No.  5,  56  p. 
Ming,  A.  1974.  Regulation  of  largemouth  bass  harvest  with  a  quota.  Pages  39-53  in  symposium  on  overharvest 

and  management  of  largemouth  bass  in  small  impoundments.  N.C.  Div.,  Amer.  Fish.  Soc.  Spec.  Pub.  3. 

Nicola,  S. ).,  and  A. ).  Cordone.  1969.  Comparisons  of  disk-dangler,  trailer,  and  plastic  jaw  tags.  Calif.  Fish  Game, 
55(4):  273-284. 

Pelzman,  R. ).  1978.  Hooking  mortality  of  largemouth  bass  (Micropterus salmoides)  less  than  305  mm  long.  Calif. 
Fish  Came,  64(3):  185-188. 

Rawstron,  R.  R.  1967.  Harvest,  mortality,  and  movement  of  selected  warmwater  fishes  in  Folsom  Lake,  California. 
Calif.  Fish  Came,  53(1);  40-48. 

Rawstron,  R.  R.,  and  K.  A.  Hashagen,  )r.  1972.  Mortality  and  survival  rates  of  tagged  largemouth  bass  (Micropterus 
salmoides)  at  Merle  Collins  Reservoir.  Calif.  Fish  Came,  58(3):  221-230. 

Rawstron,  R.  R.,  and  R.  A.  Reavis.  1974.  First-year  harvest  rates  of  largemouth  bass  at  Folsom  Lake  and  Lake 
Berryessa,  California.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  60(1):  52-53. 

Redmond,  L.  C.  1974.  Prevention  of  overharvest  of  largemouth  bass  in  Missouri  impoundments.  Pages  54-68  In 
symposium  on  harvest  and  management  of  largemouth  bass  in  small  impoundments.  N.C.  Div.,  Amer.  Fish. 
Soc.  Spec.  Pub.  (3):  54-68. 

Ricker,  W.  E.  1958.  Handbook  of  computations  for  biological  statistics  offish  populations.  Can.,  Fish.  Res.  Bd.,  Bull. 
(119):  300  p. 

USDA  Forest  Service.  1973-1977.  Annual  recreational  use  reports.  Shasta-Trinity  National  Forest,  Redding,  CA. 
Weidlein,  W.  D.  1 971 .  Summary  progress  report  on  the  Shasta  Lake  trout  management  investigations,  1 967  through 
1970.  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  Inland  Fish.  Adm.  Rep.  71-13,  25  p.  (mimeo). 

White,  W.  J.  1 970.  A  study  of  a  population  of  smallmouth  bass  ( Micropterus  dolomieuf) ,  Lacepede  at  Bale  du  Dore, 
Ontario,  M.  S.  thesis.  Univ.  of  Toronto,  83  p. 


172  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Calif.  Fish  and  Came  66  ( 3 ) :  172-177 

DIET  AND  BEHAVIORAL  ASPECTS  OF  THE  WOLF-EEL, 

ANARRHICHTHYS  OCELLATUS,  ON  SANDY  BOTTOM  IN 

MONTEREY  BAY,  CALIFORNIA  ^ 

LARRY  W.  HULBERC  ^  AND  PATSY  GRABER  ^ 

Moss  Landing  Marine  Laboratories 

P.O.  Box  223 

Moss  Landing,  California  95039 

We  studied  the  diet  and  behavior  of  wolf-eels  occurring  near  artificial  structures 
on  a  sandy  bottom  in  Monterey  Bay,  California,  to  obtain  information  about  their 
biology  and  natural  history.  Diet  was  determined  by  examining  stomach  contents. 
The  principal  prey  items  consumed  were  the  slender  crab.  Cancer  gracilis,  and  the 
sand  dollar,  Dendraster  excentricus.  Other  species  were  of  minor  importance  in  their 
diet.  Our  data  suggest  that  wolf-eels,  in  our  study  area,  are  nocturnal  predators 
which  forage  over  wide  areas  for  food. 

Scuba  divers  observed  wolf-eel  behavior.  The  individuals  observed  displayed 
strong  territorial,  homing,  and  itinerant  behaviors. 

Based  on  the  numbers  of  individuals  collected  and  observed  at  our  stations,  the 
wolf-eel  population  of  Monterey  Bay  may  be  quite  large. 

INTRODUCTION 

We  examined  the  diet  and  behavior  of  a  population  of  wolf-eels  on  a  subtidal 
sandy  bottom  in  Monterey  Bay,  California,  to  obtain  information  about  the 
biology  and  natural  history  of  the  species. 

Wolf-eels  occur  in  shallow  areas  along  the  west  coast  of  North  America  from 
Imperial  Beach  in  southern  California  (Radovich  1961),  through  Oregon  and 
Washington  (Schultz  and  DeLacy  1936),  and  as  far  north  as  the  Aleutians 
(Quast  and  Hall  1972).  A  few  specimens  have  been  reported  as  far  west  as  the 
Sea  of  Okhotsk  and  the  Sea  of  Japan  ( Popov  1 933,  Schmidt  1 965 ) .  They  inhabit 
relatively  shallow  rocky  areas  (Gill  1911;  Schultz  1930;  Barsukov  1959;  Miller 
and  Gotshall  1965;  Burge  and  Schultz  1973,  p.  161 )  although  Fitch  and  Laven- 
berg  (1971 )  reported  a  specimen  caught  as  deep  as  400  ft.  The  sandy  bottom 
environment  of  the  population  in  this  study  is  a  habitat  not  previously  reported 
for  wolf-eels  in  the  Pacific. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 
Twenty-five  wolf-eels  were  collected  randomly  from  August  1 974  to  July  1 975 
by  scuba  divers  using  hand  spears.  All  specimens  were  obtained  from  two  sites 
in  central  Monterey  Bay  at  Moss  Landing,  California  (Figure  1 ).  The  collecting 
sites  were  permanent  stations  established  on  sandy  bottom  in  18  m  and  24  m 
of  water  where  various  artificial  structures  had  been  emplaced.  They  were 
designated  M-4  and  M-5,  respectively.  All  specimens  were  collected  during  the 
morning  hours,  generally  between  0700  and  1 100  h.  Most  were  collected  during 
August  1974  and  June  and  July  1975. 

'  Accepted  for  publication  October  1979. 

^  Present  address:  Holmes  &  Narver,  Inc.,  Antarctic  Division,  999  Town  &  Country  Road,  Orange,  CA  92668. 

'  Present  address;  P.O.  Box  107,  Moss  Landing,  CA  95039. 


WOLF-EEL  DIET  AND  BEHAVIOR 


173 


DEPTH  CONTOURS  IN  METERS 


FIGURE  1.     Anarrhichthys  ocellatus  collecting  sites  M-4  and  fv1-5. 


All  wolf-eels  were  weighed  and  measured  (standard  length).  Their  stomachs 
were  removed,  fixed  in  10%  formalin,  and  later  stored  in  50%  isopropyl  alcohol. 
Subsequently,  prey  items  were  identified  to  the  lowest  taxa  possible  and  their 


174  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

volumes  determined  by  liquid  displacement.  Since  stomach  contents  consisted 
primarily  of  hard  parts  of  ingested  prey,  they  were  reassembled  as  much  as 
possible  to  determine  the  total  number  of  whole  individuals  consumed. 

An  index  of  relative  importance  (IRI)  (Pinkas,  Oliphant,  and  Iverson  1971 ) 
was  used  to  show  the  total  contribution  of  each  prey  species  to  the  diet  of  the 
wolf-eel.  This  index  was  calculated  as  IRI  =FO  (N+V)  where  N  is  the  numeri- 
cal percentage  a  food  type  contributed  to  the  total  diet,  V  is  its  volumetric 
percentage,  and  FO  is  its  percent  frequency  of  occurrence  (that  proportion  of 
stomachs  containing  the  food  item).  To  calculate  this  index,  data  from  all 
specimens  were  combined  and  treated  as  a  single  sample. 

Behavioral  aspects  of  wolf-eels  were  observed  by  scuba  divers  during  approx- 
imately 100  dives.  In  addition,  seven  specimens  were  tagged  to  document 
behavior  patterns  of  specific  individuals. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

The  specimens  obtained  ranged  from  109  to  145  cm  length  (X  —  131  cm). 
Their  weights  ranged  from  1400  to  4230  g  (X  ==2977  g),  with  much  variation 
depending  upon  the  amount  of  food  present  in  the  stomachs. 

The  slender  crab.  Cancer  gracilis,  was  the  most  frequently  consumed  species 
and,  by  far,  the  most  important  volumetrically  (Figure  2).  The  sand  dollar, 
Dendraster  excentricus,  was  occasionally  consumed  in  large  numbers.  Other 
items  were  taken  less  frequently  (Table  1 ).  The  only  evidence  of  fish  predation 
was  the  presence  of  several  fish  vertebrae  in  the  stomach  of  a  single  specimen. 
The  stomachs  of  most  wolf-eels  contained  an  appreciable  amount  of  food;  only 
four  wolf-eels  had  empty  stomachs. 

In  general,  our  findings  on  the  diet  of  A.  ocellatus  agree  with  those  of  other 
studies.  Clemens  and  Wilby  (1961 )  reported  a  diet  of  crustaceans,  sea  urchins, 
mussels,  clams,  and  other  hard  shelled  invertebrates  as  v/ell  as  fishes;  Fitch  and 
Lavenberg  (1971 )  reported  a  preponderance  of  crab  remains  in  the  stomachs, 
and  also  found  sea  urchin  fragments,  small  snails  including  abalones,  and  an 
occasional  piece  of  fish;  Jordan  and  Evermann  (1898)  found  stomachs  contain- 
ing sea  urchins  and  sand  dollars;  Jordan  and  Starks  (1895)  reported  a  diet  of 
chiefly  crustaceans  and  mussels.  In  our  study,  however,  bivalves  and  gastopods 
were  taken  rarely. 

Wolf-eels  probably  forage  over  large  areas  for  Cancer  spp.  because  we  did 
not  observe  many  large  crabs  during  hundreds  of  day  and  night  dives  in  our 
study  area  for  another  project.  We  did  observe  an  abundance  of  small  flatfishes 
in  the  area  but,  evidently  they  were  not  a  major  food  item  (Table  1 ) .  Apparently, 
A.  ocellatus  is  capable  of  capturing  only  relatively  slow  moving  prey  on  an  open 
sandy  bottom.  Fishes  may  be  easier  prey  in  rocky  areas  where  they  might  be 
trapped  more  readily. 

Of  nearly  50  wolf-eels  observed,  all  were  sedentary  (but  alert)  and  in  close 
proximity  to  an  artificial  structure.  They  were  never  observed  on  an  open  sandy 
bottom  away  from  structures.  Thus,  there  appears  to  be  strong  attraction  to 
structures  of  some  kind.  In  addition,  all  individuals  observed  exhibited  strong 
territoriality.  When  a  wolf-eel  was  approached  it  would  rear  its  head  back  and 
open  its  mouth  to  prominently  display  its  teeth.  It  would  continue  this  aggressive 
display  for  several  minutes,  occasionally  advancing  toward  the  intruder  in  a 


WOLF-EEL  DIET  AND  BEHAVIOR 


175 


threatening  manner.  A  wolf-eel  could  be  approached  to  approximately  30  cm 
before  it  would  leave.  When  it  did  leave  the  area,  it  did  so  at  a  slow,  apparently 
unhurried,  pace.  Despite  their  aggressive  displays,  none  ever  attacked,  even 
when  provoked.  They  did  not  possess  the  viciousness  reported  by  Miller  and 
Gotshall  (1965),  nor  that  reported  for  related  species  by  Goode  (1884). 

TABLE  1.     Prey  Items  Consumed  by  Individual  Anarrhichthys  ocellatus. 


I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

I  I 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 


8 


II 


I  I 


17 


Of  seven  wolf-eels  tagged  and  released  at  station  M-5,  two  were  observed  at 
the  same  location  on  subsequent  dives.  One  of  these  was  observed  in  exactly 
the  same  spot  (in  an  open  cylinder  placed  on  the  bottom)  for  nearly  a  month. 


176 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 


Other  individuals,  not  tagged  but  recognizable  by  anatomical  characteristics  and 
scars,  were  observed  at  particular  sites  for  up  to  a  month.  Wolf-eels  probably 
forage  over  wide  areas  during  their  occupation  of  a  territory  because  nearly  all 
of  those  collected  contained  an  appreciable  amount  of  food  in  their  stomachs 
and  the  abundance  of  major  prey  in  any  given  area  was  low.  By  returning 
repeatedly  to  specific  sites  for  periods  of  several  days  to  several  weeks,  the  fish 
displayed  a  strong  homing  behavior. 


iOOi 


C.  gracilis 

D.  excentricus 

Octopus 
/.  pilosus 


Bivalves 
Po  tin  ices  spp. 
—  %  F  0 


%  FREQUENCY  OF   OCCURRENCE 

FIGURE  2.     Index  of  relative  importance  (Pinkas,  Oliphant,  and  Iverson  1971 )  for  major  prey  items 
found  in  Anarrhichthys  ocellatus  stomachs. 


Because  all  wolf-eels  encountered  during  our  daylight  (morning)  dives  were 
sedentary  and  consistently  ignored  food  items  (such  as  crabs)  offered  to  them, 
and  because  most  of  those  collected  had  relatively  full  stomachs,  we  believe  that 
this  species,  at  least  in  our  study  area,  is  a  nocturnal  feeder.  On  the  other  hand, 
they  are  often  caught  during  the  day  by  hook  and  line  fishermen  (Fitch  and 
Lavenberg  1971 ).  Also,  because  locations  vacated  by  individuals  we  collected 
were  reoccupied  by  other  individuals,  generally  within  1  or  2  days,  we  conclud- 
ed that  they  are  itinerant. 

The  wolf-eel  population  in  Monterey  Bay  may  be  quite  large  if  the  numbers 
we  collected  and  observed  at  our  stations  are  any  indication  of  abundance. 


WOLF-EEL  DIET  AND  BEHAVIOR  177 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
Our  deepest  thanks  go  to  Gregor  M.  Cailliet  for  his  enthusiasm  and  support 
during  the  course  of  this  study  and  his  critical  review  of  this  paper. 

REFERENCES 

Barsukov,  V.  V.  1959.  The  wolffish  (Anarhichadldae).  Smithsonian  Inst.,  Washington,  D.  C.  (Transl.  from  Russian 

by  the  Indian  Natl.  Sci.  Doc.  Center,  New  Delhi)  292  p. 
Burge,  R.  T.,  and  S.  A.  Schultz.  1973.  The  marine  environment  in  the  vicinity  of  Diablo  Cove  with  special  reference 

to  abalones  and  bony  fishes.  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  Mar.  Res.  Tech.  Rept.  (19)  433  p. 
Clemens,  W.  A.,  and  G.  V.  Wilby.  1961.  Fishes  of  the  Pacific  coast  of  Canada.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Canada,  Bull.  (68). 

368  p. 
Fitch,  |.  E.,  and  F.  J.  Lavenberg.  1971.  Marine  food  and  game  fishes  of  California.  Univ.  California  Press,  Berkeley. 

179  p. 
Gill,  T.  1911.  Notes  on  the  structure  and  habits  of  the  wolffishes.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  Proc.  39:  157-187. 
Goode,  G.  B.  1884.  The  fisheries  and  fishery  industries  of  the  United  States.  Sec.  I.  Natural  history  of  useful  aquatic 

animals.  U.  S.  Govt.  Printing  Office,  Washington,  D.  C.  895  p. 
Jordan,  D.  S.,  and  E.  C.  Starks.  1895.  Fishes  of  Puget  Sound.  Proc.  Calif.  Acad.  Acad.  Sci.  2(5):  785-855. 
Jordan,  D.  S.,  and  B.  W.  Evermann.  1898.  Fishes  of  north  and  middle  America.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  Bull.  47,  Part  3: 

2183-3136. 
Miller,  D.  J.,  and  D.  Gotshall.  1965.  Ocean  sportfish  catch  and  effort  from  Oregon  to  Point  Arguello,  California. 

Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  Fish  Bull.,  (130):  1-135. 
Pinkas,  L.,  M.  S.  Oliphant,  and  I.  L.  K.  Iverson.  1971 .  Food  habits  of  albacore,  bluefin  tuna,  and  bonito  in  California 

waters.  Calif.  Dept.  Fish  and  Game,  Fish  Bull.,  (512):  1-105. 
Popov,  A.  M.  1933.  Fishes  of  Avatcha  Bay  on  the  southern  coast  of  Kamtchatka.  Copeia,  1933:  59-67. 
Quast,  J.  C,  and  E.  L.  Hall.  1972.  List  of  fishes  of  Alaska  and  adjacent  waters  with  a  guide  to  some  of  their  literature. 

NOAA  Tech.  Rept.  NMFS  SSRF-658.  47  p. 
Radovich,  J.  1961.  Relationships  of  some  marine  organisms  of  the  northeast  Pacific  to  water  temperatures.  Calif. 

Dept.  Fish  and  Came,  Fish  Bull.,  (112):  1-62. 
Schultz,  L.  P.  1930.  Miscellaneous  observations  on  fishes  of  Washington.  Copeia,  1930:  137-140. 
Schultz,  L.  P.,  and  A.  C.  DeLacy.  1936.  Fishes  of  the  American  northwest,  a  catalogue  of  the  fishes  of  Washington 

and  Oregon,  with  distributional  records  and  bibliography.  Pan-Pac.  Res.  Inst.,  J,  11:  127-142. 
Shmidt,  P.  Y.  1965.  Fishes  of  the  Sea  of  Okhotsk.  Smithsonian  Inst,  and  Nat.  Sci.  Found.,  Washington,  D.  C.  (Transl. 

from  Russian  by  the  Israel  Program  for  Translations.)  392  p. 


178  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

Calif.  Fish  and  Came  bbii):  \78-^8i 

DECLINE  OF  THE  LAKE  GREENHAVEN 
SACRAMENTO  PERCH  POPULATION 

C.  DAVID  VANICEK 

Department  of  Biological  Sciences 

California  State  University,  Sacramento 

Sacramento,  California  95819 

Fish  populations  at  Lake  Greenhaven  were  monitored  by  fall  surveys  from  1973 
through  1978.  The  Sacramento  perch  has  undergone  a  decline  in  abundance,  growth, 
and  condition,  and  has  failed  to  reproduce  in  3  of  the  last  4  years  of  the  study.  Other 
species,  particularly  the  bluegill,  have  increased  in  abundance  since  1973.  Competi- 
tive interference  by  the  bluegill  population  is  suggested  as  the  primary  reason  for 
the  decline  of  the  Sacramento  perch  population. 

INTRODUCTION 

Lake  Greenhaven  is  a  24-ha  eutrophic  lake  located  in  a  suburban  area  in 
southwestern  Sacramento,  California  (T8N,  R4E).  In  1973,  the  fish  population 
in  this  Lake  was  dominated  by  the  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites  interruptus, 
the  only  native  centrarchid  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains  ( Aceituno  and  Vanicek 
1976).  This  species,  endemic  to  the  lower  Sacramento-San  Joaquin  drainage 
system  and  the  Pajaro  and  Salinas  River  systems  has  undergone  a  marked 
decline  in  abundance  in  its  native  range,  although  it  has  been  successfully 
introduced  beyond  its  original  range  (Aceituno  and  Nicola  1976).  According  to 
Aceituno  and  Nicola  (1976),  Lake  Greenhaven  was  one  of  only  two  natural 
waters  in  the  state  reported  to  contain  Sacramento  perch  in  both  1955  and  1973 
statewide  surveys,  and  it  provided  the  stock  for  Sacramento  perch  introductions 
to  numerous  waters  in  the  state  by  the  Department  of  Fish  and  Game  since  1955 
(J.  Ryan,  Assoc.  Fish.  Biol.,  Calif.  Dept.  of  Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun.).  This 
paper  reports  on  changes  that  have  occurred  in  the  Lake  Greenhaven  Sacra- 
mento perch  population  since  1973. 

DESCRIPTION  OF  STUDY  AREA 

Lake  Greenhaven,  formerly  known  as  Brickyard  Pond,  was  dredged  and 
enlarged  to  its  present  size  in  1965  to  enhance  a  new  housing  development. 
Before  this  alteration,  the  Lake  contained  hitch,  Lavinia  exilicauda;  Sacramento 
blackfish,  Orthodon  microlepidotus;  carp,  Cyprinus  carpio;  Sacramento  perch; 
tule  perch,  Hysterocarpus  trash; and  sculpin,  Cottus  sp.  Just  prior  to  enlargement 
the  Lake  was  chemically  treated  with  rotenone  and  subsequently  restocked  with 
carp,  mosquitofish,  Gambus/a  aff/nus;  channel  catfish,  Ictalurus  punctatus;  Sac- 
ramento  perch;  largemouth  bass,  Micropterus  salmoides;  and  bluegill,  Lepomis 
macrochirus.  In  addition,  the  following  species  have  been  found  in  the  Lake: 
golden  shiner,  Notemigonus  crysoleucas;  white  catfish,  Ictalurus  catus;  green 
sunfish,  Lepomis  cyanel I  us;  and  white  crappie,  Pomoxis  annularis.  Fishing  pres- 
sure on  the  Lake  has  been  very  light  since  1973. 

A  description  of  the  Lake's  physical  and  chemical  characteristics  is  provided 
by  Aceituno  and  Vanicek  ( 1 976) .  Water  quality  analyses  conducted  in  July  1 979 
(dissolved  oxygen,  pH,  hardness,  alkalinity,  and  specific  conductance)  showed 


LAKE  CREENHAVEN  SACRAMENTO  PERCH  179 

little  change  in  the  chemical  nature  of  the  water  from  1973  conditions,  although 
secchi  disk  transparency  readings  were  higher  than  in  1973  when  the  water  was 
turbid  due  to  phytoplankton  blooms  resulting  from  the  addition  of  commercial 
fertilizer  to  control  submergent  vegetation.  In  1973  approximately  50%  of  the 
Lake's  shoreline  had  been  dredged  and  rip-rapped;  in  1977,  work  to  dredge  and 
rip-rap  the  rest  of  the  shoreline  began,  and  by  October  1978  virtually  all  of  the 
Lake's  shoreline  had  been  altered. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 

To  monitor  changes  in  the  Lake's  fish  fauna,  the  Fishery  Principles  class  at 
California  State  University,  Sacramento,  conducted  a  fall  population  inventory 
of  Lake  Greenhaven  from  1974  through  1978,  using  the  following  types  of 
sampling  gear:  a  30.5-m  (100-ft)  X  1.8-m  (6-ft)  bag  seine  with  2.5-cm  (1.0- 
inch)  mesh  wings  and  a  1.3-cm  (0.5-inch)  mesh  bag;  a  12.2-m  (40-ft)  X  1.8-m 
(6-ft)  bag  seine  with  1.3-cm  (0.5-inch)  mesh;  a  7.6-m  (25-ft)  X  1.8-m  (6-ft) 
bag  seine  with  3-mm  (0.1-inch)  bobbinet  mesh;  1.8-m  (6-ft)  X  .8-m  (2. 6-ft) 
fyke  nets  with  19-mm  (0.75-inch)  mesh;  multifilament  nylon  experimental  gill 
nets,  45.6-m  (150-ft)  X  1.8-m  (6-ft),  with  mesh  sizes  (square  measure)  of  19, 
25,  38,  50,  and  76  mm  (0.75,  1 .0,  1 .5,  2.0,  and  3.0  inches) .  Additional  collections 
were  made  in  May,  June,  and  July  1978.  Comparisons  were  made  with  fish 
collections  from  Aceituno  and  Vanicek's  (1976)  study  which  were  taken  from 
March  1 973  through  January  1 974  and  which  utilized  the  same  types  of  sampling 
gear. 

All  fish  were  measured  to  the  nearest  millimetre,  fork  length  (fl).  Scale 
analysis  techniques  for  age  and  growth  determination  described  by  Aceituno 
and  Vanicek  (1976)  were  used  in  this  study. 

SPECIES  COMPOSITION  AND  RELATIVE  ABUNDANCE 
Eight  species  of  fish  were  collected  in  Lake  Greenhaven  in  1 978:  golden  shiner, 
mosquitofish,  largemouth  bass,  bluegill,  white  crappie,  Sacramento  perch,  white 
catfish,  and  channel  catfish.  White  catfish  were  not  collected  in  1973,  while  carp 
and  goldfish,  both  collected  in  1973,  were  not  taken  in  1978. 

In  1 973  Sacramento  perch  dominated  the  species  complex,  as  they  comprised 
96%  of  the  total  catch  from  all  sampling  methods  combined.  In  1978,  however, 
they  comprised  only  2%  of  the  total  catch.  In  contrast,  bluegill  increased  from 
less  than  3%  of  the  total  catch  in  1973  to  94%  in  1978.  To  make  more  specific 
comparison  of  changes  in  abundance  of  the  species  between  the  2  years,  I 
contrasted  the  average  number  of  fish  by  species  caught  per  overnight  gill  net 
set  of  the  1 1  sets  made  in  1 973  with  the  9  sets  in  1 978  (Table  1 ) .  The  most  striking 
contrast  was  the  decrease  of  the  Sacramento  perch  from  an  average  of  53.0  fish 
per  set  in  1973  to  only  10.9  in  1978.  For  the  same  years,  bluegill  increased  from 
0.7  fish  per  set  to  6.8  fish.  White  catfish,  golden  shiner,  and  white  crappie 
showed  slight  increases.  During  the  1974-1977  period,  when  gill  net  collections 
were  made  only  in  September  or  October,  the  Sacramento  perch  decline  was 
indicated  by  the  abrupt  drop  in  catch  per  set  from  99.0  fish  in  1975  to  17.0  and 
7.3  fish  in  1976  and  1977,  respectively.  Comparisons  of  catches  with  fyke  nets 
and  seines  were  limited  since  the  shoreline  areas  where  these  nets  were  used 
have  been  altered,  and  the  nets,  especially  the  fyke  nets,  could  not  be  used 


180  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

effectively  after  1976.  September  fyke  net  catches  of  Sacramento  perch  dropped 
from  an  average  of  11  and  13  fish  per  net  in  1973  and  1974,  respectively,  to  7 
fish  per  net  in  1975  and  again  in  1976.  The  1975  figure  may  be  misleading  since 
several  of  the  fyke  nets  had  been  disturbed  by  intruders.  Small  bluegills  (age  0 
and  I)  dominated  minnow  seine  collections  in  1975,  1977,  and  1978,  whereas 
young  Sacramento  perch  were  the  most  abundant  fish  in  the  1973,  1974,  and 
1976  collections. 

TABLE  1.  Average  Number  of  Fish  Caught  per  Overnight  Gill  Net  Set,  1973  and  1978,  Lake 
Greenhaven. 

A  verage  no.  fish 
per  set 
Species  1973  (11  sets)  1978  (9  sets) 

Sacramento  perch 53.0  10.9 

Bluegill 0.7  6.8 

Largemouth  bass 0.7  0.6 

White  crappie 0.0  1.3 

Golden  shiner 0.1  0.3 

White  catfish 0.0  0.4 

SACRAMENTO  PERCH  POPULATION  CHANGES 

The  size  and  age  structure  of  the  Sacramento  perch  population  has  changed 
radically  since  1973.  Length-frequency  histograms  (Figure  1 ),  based  on  all  fish 
collected  during  fall  collections  from  1973-1978,  indicated  a  constant  reduction 
in  range  of  sizes,  with  the  disappearance  of  large  and  small  fish.  In  1973  perch 
in  the  samples  ranged  from  35  to  265  mm  PL,  while  in  1978  the  size  range  was 
reduced  to  130  to  155  mm  fl.  There  had  also  been  a  loss  of  younger  age  groups 
due  to  reproductive  failure  in  1975,  1977,  and  1978.  Although  successful  repro- 
duction did  occur  in  1976,  no  survivors  of  this  year  class  were  collected  in  1977 
or  1978.  Mean  size  of  these  young-of-the-year  perch  in  September  1976  was 
considerably  smaller  than  at  this  time  in  1973  and  1974  (Figure  1 ). 

Scale  analysis  of  fish  collected  in  1978  revealed  three  age  groups:  IV,  V,  VI. 
In  contrast,  in  1973  seven  age  groups  (0  through  VI)  were  present.  Growth 
histories  of  1978  fish  were  not  back-calculated  because  I  had  difficulty  in  estab- 
lishing a  body-scale  relationship;  however,  mean  lengths  at  time  of  capture  were 
much  shorter  in  1978  than  the  respective  age  group  from  1973  (Table  2).  I 
conclude  that  the  annual  growth  of  the  Sacramento  perch  has  been  dramatically 
reduced  over  the  past  4  years  (Figure  1 ). 

TABLE  2.  Comparisons  of  Mean  Fork  Length  (Millimetres)  at  Time  of  Capture  of  Sacra- 
mento Perch  by  Age  Group,  1973  and  1978,  Lake  Greenhaven  (Number  of  Fish  in 
Parentheses). 

Year  of  capture 
Age  1973  '  1978 

IV 241   (17)  145  (20) 

V 305  (1 )  151  (9) 

VI 319  (1)  164  (3) 

*  Data  from  Aceituno  and  Vanicek  (1976) 

Condition  factors,  Kfl  (  =  W3/L  X  10^),  were  calculated  for  fish  collected  in 
fall  surveys  (September  or  early  October)  from  1973  through  1978  (Table  3). 


LAKE  GREENHAVEN  SACRAMENTO  PERCH 


181 


The  mean  Kfl  value  dropped  considerably  from  1973  to  1974,  and  has  remained 
below  2.00  since.  Throughout  1973,  the  mean  K  values  never  fell  below  2.00 
(Aceituno  and  Vanicek  1976).  The  difference  between  the  mean  K  values  from 
1973  and  subsequent  years  is  significant  at  the  99%  level. 


-2 

o 

u 

o 


O 

111 

CO 


20         40         60         80        100        120       140       160       180       200       220      240       260 

FIGURE  1.     Length  frequencies  of  all  Sacramento  perch  captured  in  September-October,  1973 
through  1978,  in  Lake  Greenhaven. 


DISCUSSION  AND  CONCLUSIONS 
The  Lake  Greenhaven  Sacramento  perch  population  is  stressed  and  declining, 
as  evidenced  by  the  reproductive  failures,  reduced  growth,  and  low  condition 
coefficients  in  recent  years,  and  by  decreased  relative  abundance.  Concurrently 
the  bluegill  population  has  increased  and  is  now  the  domimant  species  in  the 
Lake.  Catch  per  unit  effort  statistics  are  not  valid  for  comparing  relative  abun- 


182  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

dance  of  different  species  due  to  differences  in  vulnerability  to  gear,  but  the 
major  changes  in  catch  per  gill  net  set  for  bluegill  and  Sacramento  perch  un- 
doubtedly do  reflect  changes  in  abundance  over  the  5-year  period.  Moreover, 
the  catches  in  the  minnow  seine  hauls  reflect  this  trend  as  no  Sacramento  perch 
young-of-the-year  were  collected  in  3  of  the  last  4  years  when  young  bluegill 
dominated  the  catches. 

TABLE  3.     Mean  Condition  Factors  of  Sacramento  Perch  Collected  in  Lake  Greenhaven, 
September-October,  1973-1978. 

Mean  K  factor 

(number  of  fish 

Date  of  collection  in  parentheses) 

3I2M73 2.40  (22) 

9/21/74 1.84  (43) 

9/13/75 1.74  (38) 

9/11/76 1.64  (52) 

10/6/78 1.83  (18) 

Competition  with  exotic  centrarchids,  especially  the  bluegill,  has  been  sug- 
gested as  a  major  cause  of  the  decline  of  the  Sacramento  perch  in  its  native 
waters  (Moyle,  Mathews,  and  Bonderson  1974;  Aceitunoand  Nicola  1976).  The 
mechanism  of  this  competition  may  involve  interference.  Observations  in 
aquaria  indicate  that  in  interspecific  encounters,  bluegill  consistently  dominate 
and  displace  Sacramento  perch  (Mary  Bacon,  California  State  University,  Sacra- 
mento, pers.  commun.;  Moyle  et  al.  1974).  Although  Imler,  Weber,  and  Fyock 
(1975)  concluded  that  Sacramento  perch  can  compete  successfully  with  a 
variety  of  species,  bluegill  were  either  scarce  or  absent  in  their  study  ponds  in 
Colorado.  Murphy  (1948)  attributed  decline  of  the  Sacramento  perch  to  its 
failure  to  guard  its  eggs;  however,  more  recent  investigators  have  reported  that 
perch  do  defend  their  nests  against  potential  egg  predators  (Mathews  1965, 
Aceituno  1974). 

While  bluegill  and  Sacramento  perch  were  both  stocked  in  Lake  Greenhaven 
after  it  was  renovated  in  1966,  it  is  not  clear  why  bluegill  did  not  become 
abundant  until  1975,  the  time  when  the  Sacramento  perch  began  to  decline.  By 
this  time  the  bluegill  may  have  become  abundant  enough  to  interfere  with  the 
perch  by  displacing  them  from  preferred  habitats  and  spawning  sites. 

No  major  changes  in  water  quality  that  might  be  detrimental  to  the  Sacra- 
mento perch  were  noted  between  1973  and  1978.  Commercial  fertilizer  was  not 
added  to  the  Lake  after  1973,  and  subsequently,  primary  productivity  has  proba- 
bly decreased,  as  the  increase  in  water  transparency  suggests.  However,  this 
decrease  in  productivity  would  be  expected  to  affect  all  species.  Perhaps  the 
reduced  food  supply  intensified  interspecific  competition  between  the  bluegill 
and  Sacramento  perch.  1  feel  that  it  is  unlikely  that  the  decrease  in  turbidity  in 
itself  was  responsible  for  the  perch  decline,  since  thriving  populations  have  been 
reported  from  Lake  Almanor  (Aceituno  and  Vanicek  1976),  Pyramid  Lake 
(Johnson  1958),  and  Crowley  Lake  (E.  P.  Pister,  Assoc.  Fish.  Biol.  Calif.  Dept. 
Fish  and  Game,  pers.  commun.)  where  water  clarity  was  high.  The  only  other 
apparent  environmental  change  has  been  the  shoreline  alteration  and  creation 
of  new  bays  along  the  northwest  shore,  but  the  decline  of  the  perch  population 
was  in  evidence  in  1975,  well  before  the  alterations  began  in  1977. 


LAKE  GREENHAVEN  SACRAMENTO  PERCH  183 

In  summary,  observations  on  these  changes  in  the  Lake  Greenhaven  fish  fauna 
support  the  hypothesis  that  Sacramento  perch  are  negatively  affected  by  intro- 
duced centrarchids,  particularly  the  bluegill.  If  the  present  trend  continues,  the 
Sacramento  perch  will  soon  become  extinct  in  Lake  Greenhaven,  one  of  the  few 
locations  where  this  species  has  sustained  a  population  in  its  native  range. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  wish  to  extend  my  appreciation  to  the  following  for  assisting  in  this  project: 
Peter  B.  Moyle  and  Martin  R.  Brittan,  for  reviewing  the  manuscript;  Gary  Gross- 
man, for  collecting  the  1977  data;  the  numerous  California  State  University, 
Sacramento  students  who  assisted  in  the  field  collections;  and  the  Lake  Green- 
haven Homeowner's  Association  for  allowing  us  free  access  to  the  Lake. 

REFERENCES 

Aceituno,  M.  E.  1974.  A  study  of  the  status  and  ecology  of  the  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites  interruptus  (Cirard), 
in  California.  M.S.  thesis,  Calif.  State  Univ.,  Sacramento.  66  p. 

Aceituno,  M.  E.,  and  S.  J.  Nicola.  1976.  Distribution  and  status  of  the  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites  interruptus 
(Cirard),  in  California.  Calif.  Fish  Came,  62(4):246-254. 

Aceituno,  M.  E.,  and  C.  D.  Vanicek.  1976.  Life  history  studies  of  the  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites  interruptus 
(Cirard),  in  California.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  62(1):5-20. 

Imler,  R.  L.,  D.  T.  Weber,  and  O.  L.  Fyock.  1975.  Survival,  reproduction,  age,  growth,  and  food  habits  of  Sacramento 

perch,  Archoplites  interruptus  (Cirard),  in  Colorado.  Am.  Fish.  Soc,  Trans.,  104(2);232-236. 
lohnson,  V.  K.  1958.  Lakes  Pyramid,  Walker,  and  Tahoe  investigations:  Life  history  of  the  Sacramento  perch. 

Nevada  Dept.  Fish  Game  Proj.  Rep.  D-J  F-4-R.  7  p.  (Mimeo). 
Mathews,  S.  B.  1965.  Reproductive  behavior  of  the  Sacramento  perch.  Copeia,  1965  (2):224-228. 
Moyle,  P.  B.,  S.  B.  Mathews,  and  N.  Bonderson.  1974.  Feeding  habits  of  the  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites 

interruptus.  Am.  Fish  Soc,  Trans.,  103(2):399-402. 
Murphy,  G.  I.  1948.  A  contribution  to  the  life  history  of  the  Sacramento  perch  (Archoplites  interruptus)  in  Clear 

Lake,  Lake  County,  California.  Calif.  Fish  Game,  34(3):93-100. 


184  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  GAME 

NOTES 

A  POPULATION  OF  THE  ENDANGERED  SANTA  CRUZ 

LONG-TOED  SALAMANDER,  AMBYSTOMA 

MACRODACTYLUM  CROCEUM,  FROM 

MONTEREY  COUNTY,  CALIFORNIA 

On  12  October  1973,  we  found  a  juvenile  Santa  Cruz  long-toed  salamander, 
Ambystoma  macrodactylum  croceum,  under  a  wooden  box  at  the  edge  of  an 
agricultural  field  3.2  km  north  of  Moss  Landing,  Monterey  County,  California. 
This  was  the  first  of  numerous  specimens  found  in  the  same  general  area  under 
debris  and  represented  the  discovery  of  a  third  breeding  population  of  A.  m. 
croceum.  Previous  to  the  discovery  of  these  specimens,  A.  M.  croceum  was 
known  to  occur  at  only  two  localities,  both  in  Santa  Cruz  County;  one  population 
breeding  at  Valencia  Lagoon  near  Aptos,  and  another  at  Ellicott  Pond  near 
Watsonville  (Russell  and  Anderson  1956;  Anderson  1967). 

In  an  attempt  to  discover  the  breeding  pond  of  this  new  population  of  A.  m. 
croceum,  we  examined  three  wetlands  located  within  1  km  of  the  original 
discovery  site  (Figure  1).  Initially,  we  concentrated  our  efforts  on  studying 
wetland  no.  2.  In  late  October  and  early  November,  1973,  we  placed  drift  fences 
and  can  traps,  constructed  as  described  by  Ruth  and  Tollestrup  (1973),  on  all 
sides  of  wetland  no.  2.  These  traps  were  monitored  daily  through  December 
1973.  From  January  through  June  1974,  we  periodically  examined  each  of  the 
three  wetlands  by  walking  the  shorelines  and  searching  for  adult  and  juvenile 
salamanders  under  logs,  debris,  and  emergent  vegetation.  Throughout  this  peri- 
od, we  used  dipnets  to  search  for  larval  salamanders  in  each  wetland.  We  found 
A.  m.  croceum  in  all  three  wetlands. 

Wetland  no.  1,  an  area  of  about  3  ha,  is  on  the  south  side  of  California  State 
Highway  No.  1  near  its  junction  with  Struve  Road.  The  wetland  is  surrounded 
on  three  sides  by  a  salt  water  marsh  and  on  the  fourth  by  agricultural  land. 
Willows,  Salix  sp.,  grow  along  the  northern  side  of  the  wetland  and  emergent 
vegetation  grows  throughout  most  of  the  wetland. 

An  abundance  of  larval  A.  m.  croceum  were  found  in  wetland  no.  1.  Most 
larval  salamanders  were  found  on  the  east  end  of  the  wetland  in  what  appeared 
to  be  a  man-made  ditch  approximately  100  m  long,  5  m  wide,  and  1  m  deep 
at  its  greatest  depth.  Many  juvenile  salamanders  were  found  under  logs  and 
debris  around  this  wetland.  Pacific  treefrog  tadpoles,  Hyla  regilla,  and  red-legged 
frog  tadpoles,  Rana  aurora,  were  common  in  the  wetland. 

Wetland  no.  2,  covering  an  area  of  about  8  ha,  is  a  pond  on  the  north  side 
of  California  State  FHighway  No.  1  approximately  100  m  NE  of  wetland  No.  1. 
Willows  are  scattered  around  the  wetland  but  are  most  concentrated  at  the  east 
and  west  ends.  Cattail,  Typha  sp.,  and  bulrush,  Scirpus  sp.,  form  dense  stands 
in  the  northern  half  of  the  wetland.  The  wetland  is  surrounded  on  three  sides 
by  agricultural  land  and  on  the  fourth  side  by  a  salt  water  marsh. 

Numerous  migrating  A.  m.  croceum  were  captured  in  can  traps  near  willow 
groves  on  the  east  and  west  ends  as  they  entered  wetland  no.  2.  Although 
numerous  mature  A.  m.  croceum  migrated  into  the  pond,  we  captured  only  one 


NOTES 


185 


Springfield 


X 


UJ 

w 

< 


ORIGINAL    SIGHTING 


d. 


N 


r 


■\KhoiI 


MOSS 
LANDING 


Wetland 
Habitat 


r- 

0 


Kilonfieters 


I 


FjCURE  1 .     Three  wetlands  in  Monterey  County,  California,  where  Santa  Cruz  long-toed  salamand- 
ers, Ambystoma  macrodactylum  croceum,  were  discovered. 


186  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

larval  salamander  throughout  the  season.  Possibly  the  dense  growth  of  emergent 
vegetation  in  the  wetland  prevented  additional  captures.  Other  amphibians 
observed  in  the  wetland  were  Pacific  treefrogs,  red-legged  frogs,  and  one  tiger 
salamander,  Ambystoma  tigrinum  californiense. 

Wetland  no.  3,  a  large  wetland  area  of  about  40  ha,  is  approximately  1  km 
northwest  of  wetlands  1  and  2  and  is  almost  completely  surrounded  by  agricul- 
tural land.  Dense  stands  of  cattail  and  bulrush  cover  much  of  the  wetland. 
Willows  are  scattered  around  the  wetland  and  two  small  groves  are  present  in 
the  northwest  end  of  the  wetland. 

Many  mature  and  juvenile  A.  m.  croceum  were  found  under  debris  and  dead 
emergent  vegetation  on  the  northwest  end  of  wetland  no.  3,  near  the  end  of 
Springfield  Road,  throughout  the  spring  and  summer.  The  presence  of  adult 
salamanders  in  the  wetland  during  the  summer  indicates  that  many  salamanders 
did  not  migrate  into  a  separate  terrestrial  habitat  after  the  breeding  season. 
Although  many  transformed  salamanders  were  found  under  vegetation,  we  were 
unable  to  capture  any  larval  salamanders.  Pacific  treefrogs  were  the  only  other 
amphibians  seen  in  the  immediate  area. 

It  seems  probable  that  the  Santa  Cruz  long-toed  salamanders  occurring  in 
wetlands  nos.  1 ,  2,  and  3  represent  what  remains  of  a  formerly  larger  population. 
The  lack  of  native  terrestrial  habitat  in  the  vicinity  of  the  three  wetlands  is 
presumably  a  major  factor  limiting  the  population  size  of  A.  m.  croceum  in  the 
area.  It  appears  that  the  most  suitable  habitat  is  now  restricted  to  the  wetlands 
themselves  and  many  salamanders  may  not  migrate  into  separate  upland  habitat. 
Additional  research  is  needed  to  evaluate  the  relative  importance  of  the  three 
wetlands  to  A.  m.  croceum.  In  addition,  the  area  in  the  vicinity  of  Elkhorn  Slough 
should  be  examined  for  additional  breeding  ponds  and  to  determine  if  the 
uplands  around  the  slough  serve  as  terrestrial  habitat  for  A.  M.  croceum. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
We  thank  Stephen  Ruth  and  Michael  Johnson  for  their  advice.  The  California 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game  supplied  the  materials  used  to  construct  drift 
fences. 

REFERENCES 

Anderson,  ).  D.  1967.  A  comparison  of  the  life  histories  of  coastal  and  montane  populations  of  Ambystoma 

macrodactylum  in  California.  Amer.  Midi.  Natur.,  77(2):  323-355. 
Russell,  R.  W.,  and  ).  D.  Anderson.  1956.  A  disjunct  population  of  the  long-nosed  (sic)  salamander  from  the  coast 

of  California.  Herpetologica,  12;  137-140. 
Ruth,  S.  B.,  and  K.  Tollestrup.  1973.  Aspects  of  the  life  history  and  current  status  of  the  Santa  Cruz  long-toed 

salamander   (Ambystoma  macrodactylum  croceum)   at  Valencia  Lagoon,  Santa  Cruz  County,  California. 

Report  for  California  Division  of  Highways.  54  pp. 

—Larry  G.  Talent  and  Carline  L  Talent,  Department  of  Fisheries  and  Wildlife, 
Oregon  State  University,  Corvallis,  Oregon  97331.  Accepted  for  publication 
January  1980. 


REPEAT  SPAWNING  OF  PACIFIC  LAMPREY 

Accounts  of  the  life  history  of  Pacific  lampreys,  Entosphenus  tridentatus,  state 
that  adults  die  after  spawning  (Hart  1973,  Scott  and  Crossman  1973).  The 
appearance  of  kelt  lampreys  at  the  Snow  Creek  and  Salmon  Creek  downstream 


NOTES  187 

migrant  traps  led  to  the  marking  of  these  fish  and  the  subsequent  recapture  of 
two  of  them. 

The  Washington  Department  of  Game  operates  permanent  fish  traps  near  the 
mouths  of  Snow  and  Salmon  creeks.  The  creeks  are  located  on  the  northeastern 
corner  of  the  Olympic  Peninsula  and  drain  into  the  Strait  of  Juan  de  Fuca.  The 
traps  operate  year  around  and  trap  upstream  and  downstream  migrants.  Lam- 
prey kelts  captured  in  the  traps  are  measured  to  the  nearest  millimeter  total 
length  (tl)  and  marked  by  cutting  a  notch  in  the  dorsal  fin.  All  lampreys  are 
subsequently  examined  for  marks. 

During  the  springs  of  1978  and  1979,  eight  lamprey  kelts  between  291  and  451 
mm  TL  were  marked  in  Salmon  Creek.  Most  of  the  kelts  were  in  good  condition; 
they  swam  strongly  and  did  not  appear  to  be  debilitated.  On  5  March  and  25 
October  1979,  two  marked  lampreys  measuring  575  mm  and  470  mm  tl,  respec- 
tively, were  captured  in  the  upstream  migrant  trap  in  Salmon  Creek.  A  more 
detailed  and  extensive  study  will  be  needed  to  determine  the  extent  of  the  ability 
of  lampreys  to  spawn  more  than  once  and  what  effect  this  has  on  their  popula- 
tion dynamics. 

REFERENCES 

Hart,  ).  L.  1973.  Pacific  fishes  of  Canada.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Can.  BulL,  (180):  1-740. 

Scott,  W.  B.,  and  E.  J.  Grossman.  1973.  Freshwater  fishes  of  Canada.  Fish.  Res.  Bd.  Can.  Bull.,  (184):  1-966. 

—John  H.  Michael  Jr.,  Washington  Department  of  Came,  Snow  Creek  Station, 
Star  Route  2,  Box  513,  Port  Townsend,  Washington  98368.  Accepted  for 
publication  December  1979. 

A  DIVER-OPERATED  SNAGGING  DEVICE  FOR 
CAPTURING  LINGCOD,  OPHIODON  ELONGATUS 

During  field  operations  to  obtain  lingcod  for  a  tagging  study,  diving  observa- 
tions revealed  that  large  numbers  of  lingcod  were  present  in  a  given  area  but 
few  were  being  taken  by  hook-and-line.  Also,  it  was  found  that  lingcod,  either 
in  the  open  or  concealed  in  caves,  could  be  approached  closely  by  divers 
without  being  frightened  away.  Based  on  this  knowledge  and  in  order  to  improve 
the  catch-per-unit-of-effort  of  this  species,  a  diver-operated  snagging  device 
(Figure  1)  was  invented  by  Reinhold  Banek  (Fish  and  Wildlife  Seasonal  Aid, 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  Monterey,  California),  which  causes  little  injury 
to  the  fish. 

One  part  of  the  device  consists  of  a  hollow,  fiberglass  fishing  pole,  about 
2.5-cm  of  which  was  cut  off  from  the  tip.  The  outside  diameter  of  the  pole's  butt 
is  2.5  cm  and  that  of  the  cut-off  tip  is  0.6  cm.  The  pole  has  one  eyelet  about  10 
cm  from  its  tip  and  another  just  above  the  handle.  A  female  electrical  fitting  was 
placed  inside  the  tip  end  of  the  pole  and  bonded  with  epoxy. 

The  other  part  of  the  device  consists  of  a  10.2-cm  long,  0.3-cm  diameter  metal 
shaft,  onto  one  end  of  which  was  bonded  a  male  electrical  fitting,  and  onto  the 
other  end  was  soldered  a  12/0  double  fish  hook  with  barbs  removed.  One  end 
of  a  90-cm  long  stainless  steel  wire  was  looped  through  the  eye  of  the  hook  and 
fastened  to  itself  with  a  crimp-type  cable  clamp.  The  other  end  of  the  wire  was 
threaded  through  the  upper  eyelet  of  the  pole  and  attached  by  a  ring  and  snap 
to  a  30.5-cm  long,  9.5-mm  diameter  piece  of  surgical  tubing,  which  was  threaded 
through  the  lower  eyelet  and  secured  to  the  handle  of  the  pole. 


188 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


12/0   DOUBLE      HOOK 


3.2  mm    FEMALE     FITTING 

3.2  mm  MALE    FITTING 

HOLLOW     SHAFT 


METAL    SHAFT 


CORK 
HANDLE 


SURGICAL     TUBING 


STAINLESS     STEEL    WIRE 


137   cm    TOTAL      LENGTH 

FICURE  1.     Snagging  device  used  to  capture  lingcod,  Ophiodon  elongatus. 

By  inserting  the  male  shaft  fitting  into  the  female  pole  fitting,  hooks  pointed 
upward,  the  snagging  device  was  ready  to  use.  When  a  lingcod  was  located,  the 
diver  would  position  the  hooks  under  the  lower  jaw  of  the  fish.  A  quick  jerk 
backward  would  both  set  the  hook  in  the  jaw  and  release  it  from  the  end  of  the 
pole.  The  fish  was  then  played,  much  like  one  would  be  with  hook-and-line.  The 
surgical  tubing  maintained  tension  on  the  line  but  provided  sufficient  elasticity 
to  minimize  injury  to  the  fish.  Only  one  lingcod  sustained  a  major  injury  from 
the  device;  the  fish  was  inadvertently  hooked  posteriorly  to  the  lower  jaw,  in 
the  gill  region,  causing  excessive  bleeding. 

When  snagged,  a  fish  would  fight  furiously  for  1 0-1 5  s,  then  sink  to  the  bottom, 
usually  with  mouth  agape.  A  second  diver  would  quickly  bag  it  and  remove  the 
hook  before  the  fish  recovered  and  began  to  fight  again.  The  fish  was  then  taken 
to  the  surface,  tagged,  and  released. 

During  200  d  of  hook-and-line  fishing  for  lingcod  in  the  Hopkins  Marine  Life 
Refuge  kelp  beds,  the  catch-per-day  (c/d)  was  0.32.  Using  the  device,  45  fish 
were  captured  in  3  d  for  a  c/d  of  15.0.  At  Chase  Reef,  in  open  water,  hook-and- 
line  c/d  was  0.82  compared  to  6.0  for  the  snagging  device.  The  highest  c/d  for 
the  device  was  24,  and  lingcod  in  this  group  ranged  in  size  from  400  mm  to  900 
mm  total  length. 

The  "snagger"  is  an  inexpensive  device  that  can  be  used  on  other  demersal 
fishes  such  as  cabezon,  Scorpaenichthys  marmoratus,  and  kelp  greenling,  Hexa- 
grammos  decagrammus.  By  altering  hook  size,  it  may  be  possible  to  use  the 
device  on  many  other  fishes. 

—James  L.  Houk,  Operations  Research  Branch,  California  Department  of  Fish 
and  Game,  2201  Garden  Road,  Monterey,  California  93940.  Present  address: 
Marine  Culture  Laboratory,  California  Department  of  Fish  and  Game,  Granite 
Canyon,  Coast  Route,  Monterey,  California  93940.  This  study  was  performed 
as  part  of  Dingell-Johnson  project  F-25-R  (Central  California  Marine  Sport  fish 
Survey),  supported  by  Federal  Aid  in  Fish  Restoration  funds.  Accepted  for 
publication  October  1979. 


NOTES  1 89 

KARYOTYPE  OF  THE  SACRAMENTO  PERCH, 
ARCHOPLITES  INTERRUPTUS 

INTRODUCTION 

The  family  Centrarchidae  contains  30  species  of  sunfishes  and  basses,  grouped 
into  nine  genera.  Karyotypic  information  is  presently  available  for  23  centrarchid 
species  representing  eight  genera  (Chiarelli  and  Capanna  1973;  Cold,  Karel,  and 
Strand  1979).  The  genus  yet  to  be  examined,  Archoplites,  contains  a  single 
species,  the  Sacramento  perch,  A.  interruptus.  This  species  was  once  common 
in  Clear  Lake  (Lake  County),  and  in  the  Pajaro-Salinas  and  the  Sacramento-San 
Joaquin  drainage  systems,  but  habitat  destruction  and  egg  predation  and  compe- 
tition by  introduced  fishes  have  made  it  rare  in  its  original  range.  It  has,  however, 
been  introduced  into  several  lakes  in  California  outside  the  original  range,  and 
into  other  states  ( Moyle  1 976) .  The  Sacramento  perch  is  the  only  extant  centrar- 
chid native  to  waters  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains.  Avise,  Straney,  and  Smith 
(1977)  pointed  out  that  since  centrarchids  are  lowland  forms,  Archoplites  has 
likely  been  isolated  from  the  other  centrarchids  since  the  time  of  formation  of 
the  Rockies  in  the  Miocene  or  early  Pliocene.  This  study  was  undertaken  to 
determine  if  the  Sacramento  perch  has  diverged  karyotypically  from  the  other 
centrarchids. 

METHODS  AND  MATERIALS 
Five  Sacramento  perch  collected  in  California  were  processed  for  chromoso- 
mal analysis,  one  from  Upper  Ruth  Lake,  Merced  County,  and  four  from  Lake 
Greenhaven,  Sacramento  County.  Chromosome  preparations  were  made  using 
either  the  leucocyte  culture  method  of  Thorgaard  (1976)  or  the  solid  tissue 
method  of  Kligerman  and  Bloom  (1977).  Both  pokeweed  and  phytohemaglutti- 
nin  were  used  as  mitogens  in  leucocyte  cultures,  but  only  phytohemagluttinin 
gave  satisfactory  results.  Only  well  spread  cells,  in  which  chromosomes  could 
be  counted  unambiguously,  were  scored. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Acceptable  chromosome  spreads  were  obtained  from  three  fish.  The  modal 
chromosome  number  for  all  three  fish  was  48  (Table  1 ) .  Of  the  85  cells  scored, 
61  (72%)  were  modal,  17  (20%)  were  hypomodal,  and  7  (8%)  were  hypermo- 
dal.  The  high  percentage  of  hypomodal  counts  was  due  primarily  to  chromo- 
some loss  in  the  poor  quality  spreads  of  fish  #4.  The  modal  karyotype  (Figure 
1 )  is  characterized  by  a  single  pair  of  subtelocentric  chromosomes  (the  first  pair 
shown)  and  23  pairs  of  acrocentric  chromosomes.  Using  the  criterion  that  only 
metacentric  and  submetacentric  chromosomes  be  counted  as  biarmed,  the 
chromosome  arm  number  of  the  fish  sampled  was  48.  No  sexual  dimorphism 
in  karyotype  was  seen;  none  has  been  reported  in  centrarchids. 

Two  basic  centrarchid  karyotypes  have  been  reported.  Most  species  have  48 
chromosomes  with  48  arms,  a  karyotype  found  in  many  diverse  groups  of  fish 
(Ohno  1974).  The  orange-spotted  sunfish,  Lepomis  humilis,  and  all  black  bass 
(Micropterus)  species  examined,  however,  differ  from  the  common  karyotype 
by  a  single  centric  fusion,  and  have  46  chromosomes  with  48  arms  (Roberts 
1964;  Post  1965;  Thompson,  Hubbs,  and  Edwards  1978).  The  green  sunfish, 
Lepomis  cyanellus,  is  polymorphic  for  the  two  karyotypes  ( Roberts  1 964;  Begak, 


190 


CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 


TABLE  1. 


Chromosome  Counts  of  Cells  of  Three  Sacramento  Perch.  Numbers  in  Paren- 
theses Indicate  How  Many  of  the  Counts  were  Obtained  by  Doubling  Bivalent 
Counts  in  Meiosis  I  Prophase  Spreads. 

Counts 


Fish  #    Sex  Tissues  sampled  <44 

1  F        Leucocytes 1 

3  M       Testes 

4  M       Kidney,  gill,  testes 2 

Total      3 


45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

50 

1 

1 

1 

22 

1 

1 

2 

11(9) 

1 

2(2) 

2 

3(1) 

2 

28(11) 

1 

2(2) 

5 

4 

5 

61 

3 

4 

FIGLIRE  1.     Metaphase  chromosomes  of  a  female  Sacramento  perch,  Archoplites  interruptus: 
2n  =48,  48  arms. 

Begak,  and  Ohno  1966).  Fontana,  Chiarelli,  and  Rossi  (1970)  reported  a  karyo- 
type of  46  chromosomes  with  56  arms  for  the  pumpkinseed  sunfish,  Lepomis 
gibbosus,  a  species  previously  reported  to  exhibit  the  common  karyotype  (Rob- 
erts 1964).  The  Sacramento  perch,  with  48  single-armed  chromosomes,  is  a 
chromosomally  typical  centrarchid. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
We  wish  to  thank  John  Dentler  for  providing  the  specimens  and  Dr.  Graham 
Gall  for  the  use  of  his  lab  facilities.  This  study  was  supported  by  a  U.  S.  Public 
Health  Service  postdoctoral  fellowship  to  G.  H.  T.  (1-F32-GMO6298-01 ). 

REFERENCES 

Avise,J.C.,  D.  O.  Straney,  and  M.  H.Smith.  1977.  Biochemical  genetics  of  sunfish.  IV.  Relationships  of  centrarchid 

genera.  Copeia,  1977(2):  250-258. 
Be^ak,  W.,  M.  L.  Begak,  and  S.  Ohno.  1966.  Intraindividual  chromosomal  polymorphism  in  green  sunfish  (Lepomis 

cyanellus)  as  evidence  of  somatic  segregation.  Cytogenetics,  5(5):  313-320. 
Chiarelli,  A.  B.,  and  E.  Capanna.  1973.  Checklist  of  fish  chromosomes.  Pages  206-232  in  A.  B.  Chiarelli  and  E. 

Capanna,  eds.,  Cytotaxonomy  and  vertebrate  evolution.  Academic  Press,  New  York. 


NOTES  191 

Fontana,  F.,  A.  B.  Chiarelli,  and  A.  C.  Rossi.  1970.  II  cariotipo  di  alcune  specie  di  Cyprinidae,  Centrarchidae, 

Characidae  studiate  mediante  colture  "in  vitro".  Caryologica,  23(4):  549-5&4. 
Cold, ).  R.,  W.  ].  Karel,  and  M.  R.  Strand.  1980.  Chromosome  formulae  of  North  American  fishes.  Prog.  Fish-Cult. 

42(1);10-23. 
Kligerman,  A.  D.,  and  S.  E.  Bloom.  1977.  Rapid  chromosome  preparations  from  solid  tissues  of  fishes.  Can.,  Fish. 

Res.  Bd.,  J.,  34(2):  266-269. 
Moyle,  P.  B.  1976.  Inland  fishes  of  California.  Univ.  of  Calif.  Press,  Berkeley  and  Los  Angeles,  CA  405  pp. 
Ohno,  S.  1974.  Protochordata,  Cyclostomata,  and  Pisces.  Pages  1-91  in  B.  John,  ed..  Animal  cytogenetics,  Vol. 

4,  Chordata  1.  Borntraeger,  Berlin. 
Post,  A.  1965.  Vergleichenede  Untersuchungen  der  Chromosomenzahlen  bei  Susswasser-Teleosteern.  Z.  Zool. 

Syst.  Evolforsch.,  3(1/2):  47-93. 
Roberts,  F.  L.  1964.  A  chromosome  study  of  twenty  species  of  Centrarchidae.  J.  Morphol.,  115(3):  401-418. 
Thompson,  K.  W.,  C.  Hubbs,  and  R. ).  Edwards.  1978.  Comparative  chromosome  morphology  of  the  black  basses. 

Copeia,  1978(1):  172-175. 
Thorgaard,  G.  H.  1976.  Robertsonian  polymorphism  and  constitutive  heterochromatin  distribution  in  chromosomes 

of  the  rainbow  trout  (Salmo  gairdneri).  Cytogenet.  Cell  Genet.  17(4):  174-184. 

Craig  A.  Busack  and  Gary  H.  Thorgaard,  Department  of  Animal  Science,  Univer- 
sity of  California,  Davis,  CA  95616.  Mr  Thorgaard' s  current  address  is:  Pro- 
gram in  Genetics,  Washington  State  University,  Pullman,  WA  99164.  Accepted 
for  publication  December  1979. 


192  CALIFORNIA  FISH  AND  CAME 

BOOK  REVIEWS 

Marine  Life 

By  David  and  Jennifer  George;  Published  in  the  USA  by  Wiley-lnterscience,  a  Division  of  John  Wiley  and 

Sons,  Inc.,  New  York;  1979;  288  pp;  $39.95. 
One  of  the  most  valuable  contributions  of  this  richly  illustrated  encyclopedia  of  marine  invertebrates 
is  that  it  contains  the  most  recent  survey  of  their  classification  by  taxonomists.  Since  it  was  written 
and  researched  by  two  biologists  from  Creat  Britain,  the  classification  scheme  probably  represents 
more  of  a  European  view  than  a  North  American  view.  For  example,  the  marine  members  of  Phylum 
ARTHROPODA,  crustaceans,  etc.,  have  been  separated  out  and  divided  into  three  new  phyla: 
Crustacea,  Chelicerata  (horseshoe  crabs,  sea  spiders)  and  Uniramia  (no  truly  marine  representa- 
tives). Twenty-seven  phyla  are  covered,  the  description  includes  a  schematic  breakdown  of  each 
phylum  into  classes,  superorders,  orders,  suborders,  and  infraorders.  The  narrative  contains  a  brief 
description  of  the  life  history  of  the  animals  within  each  group  and  representative  species  are 
discussed  in  terms  of  general  description  of  the  animal,  habitat  and  known  geographic  range, 
maximum  size,  and,  in  some  cases,  additional  life  history  data  is  given.  The  selection  of  the  1,300 
illustrated  species  is  biased  toward  the  Atlantic-Mediterranean-Caribbean  area  and  the  Indo-Pacific 
area. 

A  cursory  sample  of  Phyla  PORIFERA,  CNIDARIA,  and  CRUSTACEA  yielded  53%,  44%,  and  50% 
of  the  species,  respectively,  from  the  Atlantic  area  and  29%,  41%,  and  17%  of  the  species,  respec- 
tively, from  the  Indo-Pacific  area.  Northeastern  Pacific  species  are  poorly  represented.  Thus,  the 
authors'  statement  in  the  Introduction  .  .  .  "text  and  colour  photographs  of  the  living  marine 
animals  in  their  natural  environment,  which  should  enable  readers  to  identify  And  classify  the  marine 
invertebrates  that  they  see"  .  .  .  would  certainly  not  hold  true  for  the  Pacific  coast  area. 

Another  small  problem  arises  for  the  information  given  for  the  illustrated  species — it  appears  that 
some  of  this  information  may  be  misleading.  For  example,  the  range  of  the  common  California 
subtidal  snail,  Calliostoma  ligatum's  is  given  as  occurring  in  the  northeast  Atlantic;  their  occurrence 
in  the  northeast  Pacific  is  not  mentioned. 

The  photos  are  very  good,  ranging  from  fair  to  excellent,  and  add  greatly  to  the  overall  presenta- 
tion. I  recommend  this  book  to  those  marine  biologists  interested  in  the  most  recent  marine  inverte- 
brate classification.  Amateur  naturalists  and  divers  will  find  the  book  helpful  in  classifying  at  least 
some  of  the  invertebrates  they  may  observe. — Daniel  W.  Cotshall 

Big  Game  of  North  America — Ecology  and  Management 

Edited  by  John  L.  Schmidt  and  Douglas  L.  Gilbert  for  Wildlife  Management  Institute;  Stackpole  Books, 

Harrisburg,  PA.  1978;  490  pp;  illustrated;  $17.95. 
Big  Came  of  North  America  is  an  easy  to  read  collection  of  27  chapters  and  2  appendices  dealing 
with  the  animals,  their  management  in  the  past,  present,  and  future.  The  first  chapter  presents  the 
general  evaluation  and  taxonomic  key  to  North  America  big  game.  The  next  1 5  chapters  are  devoted 
to  individual  species  or  species  groups,  including  exotics.  Each  of  these  chapters  has  a  more  or  less 
standard  format  that  includes:  taxonomy,  population  dynamics,  ecology,  management,  and  future 
considerations  for  a  species  or  group.  The  remaining  chapters  present  management  considerations, 
including  behavior,  modeling,  carrying  capacity,  predator  control,  and  sociological  considerations 
in  management  and  in  the  future. 

All  chapters  are  not  equally  well  done,  but  as  a  text  for  students  of  big  game  management  or  as 
a  reference  for  managers  will  be  a  valuable  asset.  1  enjoyed  the  book  and,  as  California's  Big  Game 
Coordinator,  have  encouraged  its  use  by  our  big  game  biologists. — Brian  Hunter 

Tuna  and  Billfish — Fish  Without  a  Country 

By  James  Joseph,  Witec  Klawe,  and  Pat  Murphy;  paintings  by  George  Mottson.  Inter-American  Tropical 

Tuna  Commission,  P.O.  Box  1529,  La  Jolla,  CA;  1979;  VII  -\-  46  pp;  illustrated;  $7.95. 
Tuna,  billfish,  and  their  close  relatives  are  among  the  most  fascinating  and  sought  after  creatures 
inhabiting  the  world's  oceans,  but  well  grounded,  popular  accounts  of  their  life  have  been  rare.  This 
book  admirably  fills  that  gap,  presenting,  in  18  pages,  a  capsule  of  information  on  the  birth,  growth, 
adaptation,  migration,  fishery,  and  conservation  of  the  tunas  and  billfish.  Most  of  the  remainder  of 
the  book  is  devoted  to  12  of  George  Mattson's  superb  watercolors  of  tuna  and  billfish,  alone  worth 
the  purchase  price,  and  five  maps  detailing  present  knowledge  of  the  distribution,  migration,  and 
spawning  areas  of  albacore,  bluefin  tuna,  skipjack  tuna,  yellowfin  tuna,  and  striped  marlin.  A 
summary  of  International  Game  Fish  Association  world  record  catches  of  tuna,  billfish,  and  related 
species  completes  the  book. — Robson  A.  Collins 

PhotoelectTonic  composition  by 
80510 — 800    3-80    4,500    LDA  caupornu  omcE  of  state  printing 


I  Si 

-  ii 

2     -J 

-I  :? 


o 

CO 


u>  a 
tn 

0)  en 

-  »* 


^  a> 

4  so     CS 

'  -c    *» 
!  3»    rti 

iiS