The chestnut bark disease; a grave danger which threatens our forest trees, with its remedy

fl

Nitin

we

——

i
« p=
lt oe adgiiny ©

ms

ee ee atetecaslgliis

3 608
745 M4
311

apy 1

whe Chestnut Bark Disease

bind

A Grave Danger which Threatens
Our Forest Trees, with
Its Remedy

STATE FORESTER’S OFFICE
BOSTON, MASS.

F. W. RANE, STATE FORESTER

BOSTON
WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS
18 POST OFFICE SQUARE
1911]

APPROVED BY
THE STATE BoarD OF PUBLICATION.

a
i
~

)

on,

ch
3

%

SoBe Wr

5
oa’ a, \\

THE CHESTNUT BARK DISEASE.

Tue DisEasr AND Irs Meruop or ATTACK.

The State Forester wishes to call the attention of the citizens
of the Commonwealth to a serious disease of the common chest-
nut (Castanea dentata),—a disease which has been working
for some time in the States of New York, New Jersey, Con-
necticut and Pennsylvania, and which has been found to be
slowly gaining a foothold in Massachusetts. This disease is
caused by a fungus known botanically as Diaporthe parasitica
(also as Valsonectria parasitica), and grows in and derives nour-
ishment from the tissues of the inner bark of the chestnut tree.
The fungus is conveyed from one place to another by means of
“spores ” or fruiting bodies, which are analogous to seeds in the
higher orders of plants. These spores, being small and very light,
are easily carried long distances by the wind, and when blown
against a chestnut tree find lodgment in any wounds, of which
even the healthiest tree often has a great many, that may be in
the bark. It makes no difference with the disease whether the
spores find a refuge in the tissues of the thick bark of the trunk
or the thinner bark of the small twigs, — the fungus develops
equally well. It is true that in localities where the disease is
rare the spread is slow, but the fact that it can increase to an
alarming rate has been proved in our sister States, where it is
no exaggeration to say that in certain sections the chestnut is
becoming extinct.

GROWTH.

The spores having gained an entrance, the fungus begins to
spread by sending out many small fibers, much in the same way
that a plant sends out roots. These fibers, pushing about and
through the growing cells of the tree to obtain nourishment, form
a close network which soon saps the life of the section where
they are.

4

Now, the serious part of this process of growth, looked at from
the tree standpoint, lies in the fact that the fungus shows a
marked tendency to grow around the infected branch or stem,
thus girdling it, and killing all growth above that point. When
this happens to the trunk of a tree it is easily seen that it becomes
a serious matter.

Furthermore, the trunk of a tree may be infected by spores
coming from diseased parts of its own branches, thus multiplying
the disease within itself so to speak.

APPEARANCE OF DISEASED PARTS.

The following features are characteristic of the external ap-
pearance of the diseased tree. The outer bark over the diseased
part is of a slightly reddish tinge, more so than the rest of the
bark, and as the disease progresses this reddish area becomes coy-
ered with yellowish, brownish, or orange-colored pustules. Fur-
ther, in damp weather or damp situations the spores are often
extruded in the form of greenish-yellow “ strings.” The bark
splits open up and down the length of the infected spot and often
shows a swelled appearance. The cracks are filled with twisted
and criss-crossed fibers of a slightly yellowish color. Among the
smaller branches the cracks are of course less visible, but they
still occur.

It should be here stated that these same characteristics may
be the result of the work of other species of fungi than the one
in question, and therefore, in order to be sure, specimens should
be sent to a botanist for a microscopic examination. Such iden-
tification will be gladly made by the Bureau of Plant Industry,
United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.,
or by the Massachusetts Agricultural College, Amherst, Mass.

TIME FOR MAKING OBSERVATIONS.

The best time for seeing the evidences of the work of this
fungus is the season now approaching, viz., in the spring, when
the leaves begin to appear. The reason for this is not that the
disease does the greatest amount of damage at this time, but be-
cause trees that have been injured the previous season by having
much of their live tissue destroyed, instead of putting forth

‘6 Ei ....~ » ey

Two trees killed by the disease. Note the dilapidated or shreddy appearance of the bark
and the few persistent dead leaves; also, portion of upper part of left-hand tree, where
bark is falling off. (All photographs taken at Wilbraham, Mass., Feb. 23, 1911.)

Infested trunk, showing how bark splits open.
(This is a nearer view of section marked “ y”
in photograph to the left.)

Infested stem. The fungus
tends to girdle the dis-
eased portion rather than
to extend up and down.
sy and i i ese are dis-
eased sections,

5)

healthy new leaves can produce only sickly and stunted foliage,
the extent of the blighted area depending on whether the main
stem or only a branch was attacked.

Mertruops or ConTrROL.

It should be understood that there is no known method of cur-
ing the disease, or of saving woodland once it has become thor-
oughly infested. The experience of other States has proved
this. Nor is it possible to save single trees, if badly diseased,
except at great expense, and even then the chance for failure is
great, owing to the impossibility of locating all the infected
spots.

Vigorous Mrasurrs NEEDED IN Earty Stages.

To check its spread at the beginning of its entrance into a
locality is, therefore, the only hope, and this hope is considered
a strong one by those who have studied the disease most.

Dr. Haven Metcalf, who is the pathologist in charge of inves-
tigating this bight for the government Bureau of Plant Indus-
try, and who has spent a great deal of time in this work, states
that “in all cases we know of where the disease has been care-
fully eradicated, in localities where-it has just appeared, the
work has been very successful; so that we feel warranted in
advising a very considerable outlay of energy to eradicate the
disease at the outset.”

Metuops oF ERADICATING.

Inspection of Nursery Stock.

There are several ways of going about the eradication of the
blight. All chestnut nursery stock should be carefully inspected
for signs of the disease, as such stock has heretofore apparently
been one of the chief agencies of spreading the fungus. This
precaution should be taken by nurserymen and purchasers alike.

Prompt Destruction of Diseased Trees.
A careful inspection of trees for evidences of the disease
should be made by all owners of chestnut woodland during the
months of May and June, and any tree found infected should at

6

once be cut down, the wood put into marketable form, and all
brush, and if possible all patches of diseased bark, burned at the
first opportunity. If this is not done, the down tree merely
becomes a center of infection for the rest of the woods, as it is
known that the fungus may live on dead bark for at least six
months after cutting.

In answer to the question as to whether sprouts from the
stumps of infected trees that have been cut will also themselves
be infected, it should be said that for the first year at least they
will not be, but after that they should be carefully examined for
signs of the disease.

TREATMENT OTHER THAN CUTTING.
Spraying.

Experiments have shown it to be a matter of doubt as to
whether the spraying of infected trees is of any avail against
this fungus. It is possible, however, that in the case of valuable
shade trees very frequent sprayings might have a tendency
toward preventing infection.

Broken limbs, wounds, cracks and crotches of branches are
fruitful sources of attack, and the fungus should be looked for at
these points.

Local Cutting of Infected Spots.

The other method of individual treatment that has proved suc-
cessful, though only in the case of valuable trees, where the ex-
pense was warranted, is the one of cutting and removing all
patches of diseased bark and carefully protecting the exposed
surface with a coat of tar or paint. This treatment must be
thorough, and even then it will do no good if the disease has
progressed too far. Infected branches should be removed alto-
gether, at a good distance below the point of infection, and any
bark cutting should be done at least an inch beyond and outside
of the discolored area, which shows the location of the fungus.

A tree that has been already girdled should be cut down at
ence, and trees under treatment should be inspected frequently,
say about June 1, July 15 and September 1, or oftener in wet
weather.

Co-opERATION NeEcrEssary.

It is believed that by carefully following the foregoing instruc-
tions the disease can be kept under control in Massachusetts,
with the constant hope that some natural enemy will appear to
assist in the work. No controlling enemy, however, is known at
present. All persons are therefore urged to do their utmost,
either by reporting cases to this office or by actively using some
of the above measures of control, to aid in checking this enemy
of one of our best timber trees.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Reference is made to the publications of the United States
Department of Agriculture on this subject, especially Bulletin
141, Part V., of the Bureau of Plant Industry, from which
several extracts, including quoted passages in this pamphlet, have
been taken (those who are interested are advised to obtain a copy
of this bulletin) ; also to a report of the Main Line Citizensg’
Association of Haverford, Pa.

CoNncCLUSION.

Lest the serious results of this disease be underestimated, the
following instances of its work in other localities are cited : —

“A survey of the Forest Park, Brooklyn, showed ‘ that 16,695 chest-
nut trees were killed in the 350 acres of woodland in this park alone.
Of this number, about 9,000 were between 8 and 12 inches in diameter,
and the remaining 7,000 or more were of larger size.’ ”

“Tn a recent publication Dr. W. A. Murrill estimates the financial
loss from this disease ‘in and about New York City’ at ‘ between five
and ten million dollars.’ ”

With this loss in a city it can readily be seen what an enor-
mous loss would occur should the disease become prevalent in the
woodlands.

It becomes a question, therefore, as to which is the better
economy, — to do nothing, and lose our chestnut trees, or to do
our utmost at this early stage, with a fair chance of saving them.

- LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

@@2 810 869 2 ©