1
wl^
^^
vP'^^
H
M
PI
ii
rniiv
..ImGDOM ON Earth,
OR THE
_ HURCH OF I
And Her
Divine Constitution^
— '-^^ »■— -v~- —
Organization Framework
VliNisTERS AND Officials
Explained.
/^brkeiey'N
-x^
Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive
in 2008 witii funding from
IVIicrosoft Corporation
http://www.arcliive.org/details/christskingdomonOOmeagrich
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA,
Washincton, D. C, January lo, 1893.
Rev. Jas. L. Mea<;iikr:
Rev. and Dkak Father — I am requested by Mgr. Satolli, the Apos-
tolic Delegate, to thank you both for the letter and for the book, (Christ's
Kingdom), you have kindly addressed to him. He read with great
pleasure the sentiments expressed in your letter. He wants me also
to congratulate you as the author of the Work, which you have presented
to him. He said to me that he had already read part of it, and that what
he had read pleased him greatly, and made him think favorably of the
whole.
I am very glad. Rev. Dear Father, to convey you these congratu-
lations. Coming from such an authority, they will, I hope, encourage you
to compose many other works in the interest of religion and of the Church.
I hope also that you will accomplish the promise that you have made
to Dr. Bouquillon and to me at Montreal, to gratify us with a visit.
Wishing you a happy new year, I remain with respect,
Yours in Christ,
A. ORBAN.
CHRIST KNOCKING AT THE DOOR OF THE READER'S HEART.
St. Joseph's Provincial Seminaky.
Perlegi opus cui titulus : Christ's Kingdom on Earth, or, The Church and
Her Divine Constitution, Organization andFramework, Explained for the People,
by the Rev. J. L. Meagher, et nihil in eo reperi quod obstai, quoad Fidem et
Mores, quominus typis evulgetur,
Trcgae^ 9a JDecembi-is, 1891.
H. GABRIELS, Censor Deputatus.
Bishop of Ogdetisburg.
Imprimatur,
■ii p. A. LUDDEN,
Bishop of Syracuse.
Imprimatur, ^^^^ Stack
^ M. A. CORRIGAN,
Archbishop of New York.
COPYRIGHT 1891.
BY REV. JAMES L. MEAGHER
ALL BIGHTS RESERVED.
Competent parties wishing to translate this and other books by the same
author into other languages are invited to write him at Cazenovia, N. Y., from
whom they may receive full authority and duplicates of the engravings.
Other "Works by the same Author :
Teaching Truth by Signs and Ceremonies, . . . 29th Edition.
The Festal Year, ...... 5th "
The Great Cathedrals and Churches, .... 2d "
The Seven Gates of Heaven on the Sacraments, 7th "
Man the Mirror of the Universe or the Agreement of Science and Religion.
Te^cL&e^
^tr^HERE never was and there never
r^^ will be on earth an institution, so
(^ wonderful and so wortliy of our
study as the Catholic Church.
She comes down from God the Son, as
he came from his eternal Fatlier, and:
coming to earth, she continues his work,
of redemption. She is the extension:
and the continuation of the atonement
of Christ. The Holy Spirit, coming
from Father and Son, comes down to
earth to form the church out of the scattered children of Adam^
binding all christians into the Mystic Body of Christ. The Son,
her Head, the Holy Ghost, her Soul, the church penetrates to all
nations, teaching with the authority of God, redeeming every
member of the fallen race, raising up men weighted with sin, heal-
ing the diseases of society, preparing her members for the glories
of heaven. Happy the peoples who sit at her feet, listening to her
teachings, feeding on. her sacraments, dwelling in peace under her
laws. Bride of the Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of his
members, the heavenly Jerusalem, the City of God, formed of the
chosen people, she fills the world with the glories of her Founder,
In the following pages will be found complete explanations of
her divine constitution and her organization, which enabled her
to survive the numerous revolutions, which overturned every hu-
man institution of the ancient world, showing how she flows down
from the divine nature of " The Word of God." A careful study
of the following pages will show the reader that the divine con-
iii
127
iv PEEFACE.
stitution of the church is a worthy work of God's only Begotten
Son.
In going through tliese years of research into the great writers,
we did not always give their names, lest it might load the book
with references, therefore we thought it better to cite only a
part of the chief authors in diverse languages, lest it niiglit re-
pel the reader. But we tried to make every tiling so plain that
the reader can read without an effort, and profit by the book.
After leaving no branch of learning untouched which might
throw light on the subject, we conclude that the See of Peter is
the "Rock" on which Christ built the whole church, that if it
were not for the Bishops of Rome, not a man on earth to-day
would believe in Christ or even in God. The Vatican council
gave the finishing touches to that wonderous organization, the
cljurch of God. Then all hail to Him who sits on Peter's 'J'lnone.
We but reflect the brightness of eternal Truth which shines forth
from our Jesus' Vicar, and the first step away from Him leads
farther and farther from God, till it ends in the destruction of the
whole framework of revelation in the mind of man.
Jas. L. Meagher.
Caaenovia, N. Y., Christmas, 1891.
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION.
Wonders of the church — "We are born of Christ — The church ever
the same — Why God created — Fall of the ano^els — Creation and
fall of man — How sin disturbed God's works — Why God had
mercy on us — The Incarnation — Adam's lost empire — Christ now
takes the place of Adam — The church Christ's empire — How we
are born of Christ — Politics and Reliifion — The Trinity the mod-
el of the church — The mission of Christ and of the Holy Ghost —
The live hierarchies of heaven and of the earth, &c.. 13-25
CHAPTER H.
GOD IS THE HEAD OF CHRIST.
How Christ became the new Head of the human race — Why the
Father sent the Son — How Christ sent the apostles — Christ's
prayer for unity of his church — The wonders of the Incarnation —
Christ wishes all men to partake in his glories — The church one
1
5J CONTENTS.
with Christ and by him one with the Persons of the Holy Trinity
— The Holy Ghost the Soul of the church — God rules Christ and
Christ rules the church — The mystery of the God-man explained
— The atonement of Christ — The grace of Christ flowing down on
the church — The church the mystic body of Christ — Christ as
head of the church — Christ the only Redeemer of mankind, &c. 26-40
CHAPTER HI.
CHRIST IS THE HEAD OF THE CHDRCH.
The Father generates the Son —The Father and Son give rise to the
Holy Ghost and the latter forms the church — Christ feeds and
the Spirit animates the church — Christ lays down the constitution
of the church — All Christ received from his Father he gave the
church — The parish and diocese coming from the universal church
as she comes from Christ, as the latter comes from his Father —
The glories ot the church— Union of the members of the church
through Christ — The clergy sending the Holy Ghost into the
souls of her members — The church reproducing the processions
of the Persons of God — Union of the church members — Union
of the episcopacy and of the clergy — Creation of new parishes
and dioceses— How clergy and laity are born of the church —
The clergy espoused to their churches — The sufferings of the
martyrs — The authority of the church, «&c 4l-5J>
CHAPTER IV.
THE ETERNAL PRIESTHOOD OF CHRIST.
Figures of Christ's Priesthood in the Old Testament — The eternal
High Priest of the human race — Ordination of the apostles — Sub-
stance and acts in creatures — Orders and jurisdiction in the church
— Christ offering his sacrifice to his Father — Christ giving his
priesthood to his clergy — Diverse ranks in hoh' orders — Christ ex-
ercising the order of porter, exorcist, reader, subdeacon, deacon,
priest and bishop — Christ gives his clergy the same powers — The
priesthood of Christ ever in act — In men holy ordeis is limited by
jurisdiction — The clergymen's titles to their churches — First was
the universal church, then the diocese, then the parish — Clergymen
first belong to the church universal, then to the diocese, then to
the parish — This is the foundation of their titles— The spouse
partakes in the dignity of her husband — The church has the au-
thority of Christ her spouse — Clergymen are the agents of Christ
and bind the latter by their ministry — Neither faith or morals
required in the minister — Christ and his clergy are one — Reasons
for addressing clergymen as Rev., Most Rev., «!cc. — The clergy
preach, sanctify and rule for Christ — Appointing delegates — Vic-
ars apostolic — The church governed by law — The nature of juris-
diction— The Priesthood of Christ will last forever— Ordination
of the clergy sent by Christ to do his work till he comes
ajiain, &c 60-78
CONTENTS. 6
CHAPTER V.
THE CHURCH TEACHING, SANCTIFYING AND GOVEKNING.
Jesus Christ the JProphet, Priest and King sends his clergymen as
teachers, sanctifiers and rulers — Civil governments compared to the
church— Christ's Priesthood given by holy orders — Clergymen as
teachers of the nations — What is truth ? — The constitution of the
church given by Christ — The church cannot change her doctrines
— The church is infallible — All truth'Christ received from the Fath-
er he gave the church to teach for him — She cannot teacli error —
The teaching Chair of the church — The church sanctifying souls
— What is holiness ? — The Sunday services — The wondrous works
of the sacraments — How the church differs from schools and col-
leges-How the clergy dispense the redemption of • Christ — The
nations first taught, then sanctified and governed— The church
governing her members — The church above all earthly powers su-
preme in spiritual things — The Bishop of Rome the Vicar of
Christ and Teacher of the church— The church has legislative,
judicial and executive powers over her own members — Effects of
rebellion against the church — The glories of the church foretold
by the prophets — How she teaches, sanctities, rules and civilizes
the nations of the earth, &c 79-98
CHAPTER VI.
THE CHURCH IS ONE AND IIOI>Y.
The oneness of the Godhead revealed — One church of the Jews be-
fore the coming of Christ — One himian race — The church the
mystic body of Christ — His kingdom oft foretold — His spiritual
monarchy ruling the souls of men — All other chiu'ches are nation-
al— Origin of the Protestant churches — The divisions of Christi-
anity— The church the image of the Divinity — Necessity of union
in examples of other denominations — The Holy Spirit the bond
of union— The one church foretold in holy Writ — The judge of
faith and morals — We believe what the church teaches — The church
mentioned in the Old and New Testaments — How the diocese and
parish come forth from and live in the universal church — Politics
and religion — How the Holy Ghost unites the members of the
church — The church as the one living body of Christ — The church
bringing forth and nourishing her children — The unity of faith —
One God one church — The Spirit of Christ embracing the church
— Holiness of the church, &c 99-1 18
CHAPTER VH.
I'lIE CHUKCH IS UNIVERSAL AND APOSTOLIC.
Meaning of the word catholic — Universal regarding time and extent
— No change in the teachings of the church— She was the origin
of all constitutional governments — The church and civilization —
Extent of the church — She comes down from the apostles — Works
of the apostles — Meanings of the apostles' names— History of Sts.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, Paul, John, «fec. — Figures of the Evangel-
4 CONTENTS.
ists — Meaning of the word apostle — History of Sts. Andrew,
James, Philip, Bartholomew, Thomas, Jude, Simon, Mathias
and Judas the Traitor, «&c 119-12ft
The Universal Chureh.
CHAPTER Vni.
Christ's vicar on earth.
Christ founds his church in the persons of his apostles, ministers
and converts — As a wise statesman he appoints his prime minister
— The apostles in holy orders were equal and required a head —
The nature of a vicar — The vicar-geueral in the diocese and in the
universal church — -Christ did not lower the bishops by appointing
one over them — Christ founding the Papacy in Peter — Simon's
name changed to Peter — " The Rock " — Peter receives the Keys
— Christ made Peter one with him in the government of the
church — Peter is commissioned to " confirm " his brethren — Ex-
planation of the Greek text — The apostles went fishing — Peter
three times told to " Feed " the members of his church — The word
" Phileo " — The words St. John wrote in Greek explained — In
no other place did God repeat three times his words — The words
"Feed my lambs, Feed my sheep" — In giving the care of his
church to Peter Christ used not the same expression twice — The
first '* Feed my Lamb-folds " — The next "Govern my Sheepfolds "
the last " Feed my Sheep-folds" — The Greek words in which St.
John wrote his Gospel — Christ foretells the crucifixion of St. Peter
at Rome — His eternal See where the Papacy remains till our day
— Peter ever a])pears as the first among the apostles — The power
and the Primacy of Peter overshadowing the other dioceses —
Spiritual and civil powers — The human and divine elements in the
church — The private and public lives of the clergy — The other
apostles were the heads of holy orders, having authority over the
sacraments and the true body of Christ— To Peter Chri.stalso gave
jurisdiction over his mystic body his holy church — Christ and his
Vicar are one authority — Christ the head of each diocese — Nature
of the supremacy given to Peter — The Papacy founded on Peter
must last till the end — The apostles as universal bishops with Peter
as their head — The Papacy keeps the church united — Wife and
husband are one flesh and authority — Peter and the Roman church
one — The universal dominion of Rome foretold in the Roman em-
pire before Christ — Christ, heir of David and Solomon by his Vic-
ar now rules his universal church — Foundation of the Roman
empire as a preparation for the J'apacy — Peter at Antioch where
he founded the Maronite Rite — Peter established the patriarchal
sees of Alexandria and of Antioch — Peter over the other sees in
the apostolic age, &c 129-150
CHAPTER IX.
Peter's throne.
The constitutions of nations— How Christ founded the constitution
of the church — A congress ir.aking laws — A congress of bishops
could not rule the church — Why the apostles wrote but little —
CONTENTS. 5
The works of the great fathers of the church — The oishops ia
council — Peter comes to Home — Sts. John, Paul andJames ruling
churches — Supremacy of Peter's See — Hennas' book — Testimony
of Sts. Ignatius, Polycarp, Ireneus, Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian,
Athanasius and the bishops of Egypt — What the apostolic fathers
say al)out Peter — St. Augustin on the Papacy — The community
he founded at Hippo — The Cyrils, Theodoret and the early coun-
cils—Remarkable proofs of Peter's authority — The African
churches — The testimony of the Eastern churches — Jerusalem
sends for help to Uome — The errors of Phyrus — St. Boniface first
apostle of Germany — The English church — In the time of Charle-
magne— The church in France — Hincmar, Raban Maur, and oth-
ers— The first council of the apostles at Jerusalem — The first coun-
cil at Nice in 325 — The first council at Constantinople — The
council at Ephesus in 431 — Eutyches the heretic condemned in
451 — The second council at Constantinople — The next council at
the same city — The Iraagebreakers — The fourth council at Constan-
tinople against Photius — The "Libellus" of Pope Adrian — Sts.
Leo and Chrystom on Rome, &c 151-176
CHAPTER X.
THE TEACHER ANP KULER OF THE CHURCH.
The teacher of faith and morals — Dogmatic and moral theology —
The Bible a book of faith and morals — The Son enlightens the
mind, the Holy Spirit rules the will — The bishops are the teachers
of faith and morals — The Bishop of Rome is their teacher— The
Pope in his public and private life — In what the Pope is not
infallible — Meaning of infallibility — Private interpretation of the
Scriptures — The Church teaches through her head animated by
the Holy Spirit — Bishops and priests reflect his teachings — Peter
still teaching, sanctifying and ruling Christ's mystic body — How
doctrines are examined — The Pa])acy defines the constitution of
the church — What are morals? — The Pope as heir of Peter teaches
the whole church — What is faith? — The supernatural virtues of
faith, hope and charity — How we believe what the church
teaches — The clergy teach only the doctrines of the church —
Each Protestant preacher teaches his private opinions — What is
the Mass? — The church is Christ's empire of redeemed souls-
Ancient empires were images of her — Civil government rules only
exterior actions — The church rules the souls of men — The bish-
ops at Nice, at Florence, Trent and at the Vatican — The
church like a monarchy — A republicof which Jesus is the king —
Meaning of the words Roman Catholic — The capital of Christ's
Kingdom — Could the Papacy be removed from Rome? — The
Bishops of Rome before the council of Nice — Words of the early
fathers — Acts of a Roman emperor in the third century — The
great bishop of Milan— The bishops at Aquilia, Antioch, &c. —
The Arian heresy denies the Divinity of Christ — St. Jerome at
Bethlehem — Pope Zozimus teaches the bishops of Africa — The
learned bishop of Hippo — The bishops at Melevit — The Ephesian
council — The monarch of religion — What the schismatics hold —
Constantine moves his empire to Byzantium and founds Contanti-
6 CONTEXTS.
nople — The council of Chalcedon — The Popes ruling the East —
How they deposed the bishops of the most famous sees —Early
appeals to Home — The Popes teaching the other bisho])s of the
early Church — Popes dispensing in her universal laws and pun-
ishing the disobedient — The Pope is over the laws of the
church, but he too must obey her constitution, founded or re-
vealed by Christ, &c 177-208
CHAPTER XI.
THE FIKST BrSHOPS OF ROME.
The first Bishops of Rome were the intellectual lights of the whole
church — All important measures which spread to the whole
church came from them — They first founded the parishes in
Rome and the nuptial Mass — They beautified the Sunday services,
— Condemned errors which led to the denial of the Divinity of
Christ,— Ordered Advent and Lent to be kept each year,— Con-
demned Cerdo — Incorporated strange clergymen into the Roman
diocese, — Sent missionaries to Brittany and other nations, — Com-
manded tho clergy to shave, — Laid down regulations for nuns, —
Marked the times for the ordination of the clergy, — Reserved ap-
peals to the Roman courts, — Established the Quarter Tenses, —
Regulated the oiTerings of the people, — Nominated seven deacons
for the seven regions of Rome, — Forbade vestments worn except
during the services, — Decided against the bishops of Africa that
lay-baptism was valid, — Defined the doctrine relating to the
Trinity, — That Mass should be said only over the martyr's re-
mains, — Re organized the 25 parishes of the city of which the
pastors were called cardinals, — Condemned the Donatists, — For-
bade fasting oq Sundays and Thursdays, — Excommunicated Arius,
who denied Christ's Divinity, — Upheld Athanasius of Alexandria
against the Arians, — Deposed Arian bishops and appointed cath-
olic bishops to their sees, — Called the bishops to councils and
presided by themselves or by their legates, — Ruled the whole
church from the days of Peter to the X century, &c 209-267
CHAPTER XII.
THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS, THE SENATE OF
THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH.
Peter came to Rome and made her his spouse to aid him in liis uni-
versal government of the church — When he was crucified Rome
became his heir — The Bishop of Rome the heir of Peter's author-
ity— The cardinals are the advisers, the councillors of the Pope —
Origin of the cardinals — Meaning of the word cardinal —The
Presbytery of the Roman church— The six cardinal bishops
— The 50 cardinal priests — The seven cardinal deacons — The
cardinals are the pastors of the Roman diocese — The six cardi-
nal bishops — The corporate body of cardinals — The venerable
senate of cardinals helping the Pope in his government of the
church — The election of cardinals — The reception of new mem-
bers—Who are made cardinals ?— The senate advises the Vope,
CONTENTS. 7
administers the church during a vacancy, and elects his successor
— The cardinals at the death of the Pope — Ceremonies when the
Pope dies — Preparing for the election— Arranging for the conclave
-The senate enclosed — Preparing to vote for a Pope — Manner of
casting the ballots — Rules relating to the election — The ballots-
How the ballots are cast and counted — Asking the consent of the
candidate— The nevF Pope at his election — The caronation cere-
monies—Taking possession of the church of St. John Latern
&c 267- 288
CHAPTER Xm.
THE ROMAN CONGUKGATIONS, GOVERNMENT BUREAUS, EMBASSADORS,
LEGATES, VICARS APOSTOLIC, NOTARIES, &C.
Antiquity and dignity of the Roman congregations — The ancient
presbytery of the Roman church aiding the Pope — A consistory
— The business before the Roman courts — Prelates and curials —
The congregations of the holy office of the index — Of the council
of Trent — The congregation of rites — Of bishops and regulars —
The congregation of Propaganda — Of indulgences and relics — The
penetentiary and the rota — Tiie Apostolic chancery office — The
secretary of state— Apostolic legates — Ablegates, Nuncies, Embas-
sadors, Vicars Apostlolic, &c 289-300
CHAPTER XIV.
THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES AND ARCHBISHOPS.
Complete jurisdiction given to Peter — Archbishops, primates
and patriarchs, branches of the Papacy — Their origin — The two
Archbishops established by Peter — Antioch and Alexandria next
after Rome — In the early church — Constantinople jealous of Alex-
andria— Bishops over bishops in the early church — History of the
patriarchal sees of antiquity — Metropolitans — The chief churches
after Rome — The patriarchal sees of the present time — Meaning of
the word jiatriarch — "The forms of Peter impressed on the
whole church " — The nature of dioceses over others — How they
elected and consecrated bishops — The clergy of metropolitan sees
over the other clergy of the province — Branches of the Papacy
partaking in the Primacy of Peter — ^Papal delegations in the
early church — Primates in the middle ages — The patriarchs of the
oriental rites at the present time — The first bishops of America
— Meaning of the patriarchate — The acient councils on the patri-
archs— Primates and archbishops — Their powers regulated by
canon law — Cases on appeal before them — The primate — Nature
of the office of primate — The archbishop's powers now more re-
stricted— His duties defined by canon law — The pallium, archie-
piscopal cross, &c 301 -322
CHAPTER XV.
THE BISHOPS AS PASTORS OP THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH.
The universal church as the diocese of Christ of which the other
bishops are pastors— The bishops as pastors of the universal
CONTENTS.
church — The Roman diocese only immortal — How the apostles
founded dioceses — The Papacy sending missionaries to all pagan
nations — Missionary countries subject direct to Rome — How
dioceses are established — Bishops have a radical jurisdiction over
the whole church but subject to Peter — Dignity of bishops —
Why one bishop is over others — Ancient episcopal deans — Senior
bishops — The image of the Trinity — The bishop's mission — Epis-
copal jurisdiction — The fulness of jurisdiction only in the Bishop
of Rome— Who elects bishops? — Appointment of bishops in the
early church — The bishop a complete priest can consecrate
another bishop — Only Rome can give jurisdiction — Consecra-
tion of bishops in the early church — Jurisdiction of bis-
hops in the first ages — The schism of the Greek church — The
bishops of Rome gave jurisdiction to all bishops in all ages of
the christian religion 323-345
CHAPTER XVI.
THE BISHOPS GATHERED IN COUNCIL.
The Son the Council of the Father in heaven — The council of the
Jewish church — A council a congress of the whole church —
Object of councils — They cannot define new doctrines — Only
bishops are members of the congress — Ecumenical councils— The
Pope alone can call, preside over and ratify the proceedings of
councils — Every bishop in union with Rome has a right to take
part — They are the pastors of the universal church — All bishops
are equal in the councils — As teachers of faith and morals all vote
- Bishops of old sees are the witnesses of the traditions of their
churches — The Pope alone personally or by his legates confirms
the decrees — A papal confirmation may extend decrees of any
partial council to the whole church — General, national and pro-
vincial councils — In what they differ— Decisions of all councils
must be reviewed by Rome — A diocesan synod — The celebrated
council held in Africa — Episcopal deans and prothonotaries
in the early church — Patriarchs, primates and archbishops pre-
siding over plenary and provincial councils— When councils
should be held, «fec 346-361
The Particular Church or Diocese.
CHAPTER XVII.
HISTOUY OK THE DIOCESE.
St John the Apostle established the church services — The diocese
in the apostolic age— Formation of the Liturgies — Charity of the
apostolic converts- The bishop and the presbytery formed a court -
Description of a church in the days of the apostles — Piety of the
early christians — Prominence of the Bishop of Rome — The con-
version of Europe — The selection of the clergy — The establish-
CONTENTS. ' 9
ment of schools — The incursions of the barbarians — They des-
troyed the Roman empire — The church converts Europe the
second time— The clergy the saviours of society — The Popes
taught the world civilization— Rise of the temporal power of the
church — Famous churchmen — Founding the great Universities —
The constitution of the diocese defined in canon law — The origin
of the aristocrats and nobles from robber captains — The church
protects the poor — The feudal system — The formation of chris-
tian nations — The governments claimed the right of ajjpointing
the clergy— Gregory VII. and ITenery IV. of Germany — The
golden epoch of Christianity — Building the great cathedrals —
Converting the nobility — Establishing the parishes — Rome teach-
ing the world — The epoch of the great writers of the church —
The conquests of the Turks— Relaxing of discipline— Officials
of the diocese — Adopting strange clergymen — Causes of tne ref-
ormation— Establishing the religious orders — The reforms of the
council of Trent — Wonderful religious activity of modern
times, &c 362-387
CHAPTER XVm.
THE DIOCESE OF ROME.
Rome the eternal city becomes the seat of the Papacy — Other dio-
ceses liable to fall — The Mother of churches — Christ's Vicar-
General on earth — Meaning of the Pope's tiara — How Christ
established the church universal — The Pope the model bishop —
The Pope above the church but cannot claange her constitution
given by Christ — Peter was the " Rock," one with Christ the
" Rock of Ages " — Pilate's letter about the death of Christ — Peter
comes to Rome — Converts Pudens and his family — Simon Magus
and his errors — Nero the emperor — Corruption of the Roman
Court — Simon the Magician persecutes Peter and Paul —Many
converts — The great disputes between Sts. Peter, Paul and
Simon Magus, who claims to be the Son of God — Death of
Simon — Sts. Peter and Paul put to death at Rome — Visits to
their tombs — The common law of the church coming from the
Bishops of Rome — The Popes gave laws to Europe — The clergy
from Rome teaching the nations — The official books of the Rom-
an diocese — Church architecture, &c 890-405
CHAPTER XIX.
THE ELECTION OP BISHOPS.
Election of the apostles — Laymen taking part in the early church
— How the apostles elected bishops — St. Cyprian says by apos-
tolic tradition the clergy elect their bishop, and the bishops
consecrate him — The Popes and councils on the election of bish-
ops— Role of the archbishops and bishops— A vacancy of a
diocese — The visitor bishop — Manner of voting— Examination of
the candidate — The way the great fathers of the church were
elected — Interference of governments — Princes abuse their veto
10 CO]S^TENTS.
power — Election of bishops in the middle ages — The election of
archbishops — Kings selling episcopal sees stopped by Gregory
VII — Rulers usurp concessions given the laity — Abuses con-
demned— The cathedral chapter — Confirmation of bishops re-
served to the Pope — The oath the bishop lakes at consecration —
Patriarchs, primates and archbishops as ])apal delegates— Con-
firming the election of the bishops of tlie East — Elections in
Europe reserved to the Pope — The first archepiscopal sees of
Europe — Establishing the hierarchy in England — Archbishops
and primates act and consecrate in the name of the Bishop of
Rome— Election and consecration of archbishops at the present
time — The Bishops of liome ever reserved the right of rejecting
unworthy candidates— Historic facts — Rome first .appointed all
the episcopal sees of Europe — St. Augustine in England, St.
Patricli in Ireland — The archbishops of Thessalonica and others
became the apostolic delegates — The Bishops of Rome confirmed
or rejected the candidates for the historic sees — Bishops when
elected by the laity and clergy of the diocese — A bishop elected by
the clergy and laity forbidden to be consecrated in the early
church — From the apostolic aoe the laity proposed the candidate,
the clergy of the diocese voted for him, the archbishop or patri-
arch with the bishops of the province confirmed and consecrated
him acting as the delegates of the Roman See — Manner of selecting
bishops at the present time — Proceedings at Rome for the confir-
mation of bishops, &c 405-429
CHAPTER XX.
THE BISHOP AND THE DIOCESE.
The bishop coming down from the universal church into his dio-
cese— How the bishop was named in the early church — Bishops
are superior to priests — Bishops have both external and internal
jurisdiction — Only a bishop can ordain priests and confirm — The
bishops are the successors of the apostles — Each diocese ruled
by a bishop— The bishop is a complete high-priest — Is the epis-
copacy a sacrament? — Regular bishops of their diocese and vicars
apostolic— The jurisdiction of bishops in their dioceses — Christ
the head of the diocese— How one bishop is over others — Tlie
perfections of the diocese in the bisho|) — The bishop brings the
perfections of the universal church into his diocese — The bishop
married to the diocese— Christ as head of the diocese — The bish-
op should be a saint — The diocese surrounding the bishop--The
government of the diocese compared to civil governments — Fal-
len dioceses still live in the persons of their titular bishops — The
church universal represented by the diocese — The bishop bring-
ing forth his sons, his clergymen of the diocese — The mission of
the bishop — The bishop as the teacher of the diocese — The bish-
op as the sanctifier of the diocese— The bishop pontificating at
the altar — The beauties of the liturgy — The diocese an image of
heaven — The Latin rite— The bishop sending the Holy Ghost—
The bishop the ruler of the whole diocese according to the com-
mon law of the church, «&c 429-455
CONTENTS. 11
CHAPTER XXI.
THE bishop's duties AND OBLIGATIONS.
Members of the hierarchies corning down to rule their churches —
The relations of the bishop to the cathedral parish — The Papacy,
the episcopacy, the priesthood — Custom makes law — What bish-
op defines matters of faith and morals ? — Papal laws in the dio-
cese— What is a dispensation ? — In what laws the bishop can
dispense— Fasting, abstinence, work on Sundays — The bishop's
powers relating to church services — Interference of civil govern-
ments— The bishop's powers regarding liturgical books, church
music, chapels, oratories, &c. — The sacrament of marriage — Im-
pediments of marriage — The bishop and the clergy of the diocese
— Dimissoral letters — The support of the clergy- — The education
of the clergy — Ordination and confirmation — Papal and episco-
pal reservations — The faculties of the diocese— The religious
orders in the diocese— The dispensations from vows — The
ordination titles — Strange priests coming into the diocese —
Indulgences— Offerings for the sacraments — Ap])oint.ing assistants
— Clerical dress, vestments, &c 457-477
CHAPTER XXII.
THE CATHEDRAL CHAPTEK, THE SENATE OF THE DIOCESE.
«
The apostles established the presbytery of the diocese — The ancient
fathers of the presbytery — The presbytery of the apostolic age
formed of ])riests and deacons — Twelve priests and seven deacons
— The bishop administered the whole diocese — How the apostles
founded churches — The cathedral, the mother church of ttie
whole diocese — The bishops of the early church did nothing
without consulting their presbytery — The senate of the diocese
in the early ages — Divisions between the bishops and chapters —
The cathedral chapter — Rome regulates their duties — The cathe-
dral chapter a corporate body of clergymen — The rural dean and
his office — Origin of the archdeacon and his duties — Head of the
deacons, he was often the bishop's vicar — The archpriest — The
teacher of the Bible — The penitentiary — The bishop's court —
The duties of each member of the chapter — The celebrated chap-
ter of Lincoln cathedral, England — The first chapter of Montreal
— The chapter as a senate aids the bishop in his administration
of the dioceses, and attends him on ceremonies — Singing the
divine office — The place where they meet — The chapter as a sen-
ate— The chairman of the senate — The duties of the senate — The
bishop must get the advice of the senate and follow their advice
in important matters — Separate from the bishop they have not
authority in the diocese— They have over their own members
— Enactments of the senate must be signed by the bishop — The
chapter gets their powers from the common law — Bishop and sen-
ate together administer the diocese — The chapter admonishes
the bishop of his faults — The administration of seminaries — Can-
onical vestments — The chapter during a vacancy of the see — The
chapter appoints an administrator of the diocese — The bishop's
council in the U. S., &c 477-502
12 CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XXIII.
THE PARISH PRIEST.
The diocese was first called a parish — Before the IV. century the
bishop administered the whole diocese as a large parish — Parish-
es began first in Rome and then in Alexandria — Country purishes
established in the IV. century — City parishes founded in the X.
century — Before this the archpriest as vicar of the bishop admin-
istered the country parts of the diocese — Were the seventy-two
disciples priests? — Errors of the University of the Sorbonne —
The ancient presbytery of the diocese aided the bishop —
They administered the sacraments in the name of the bishop —
The errors of Aerius — The parish is an imperfect church — The
Jansenist's errors regarding parish priests and bishops — Parish
priests have only internal jurisdiction — They cannot excommuni-
cate like bishops — Meaning of the word parish — Parish priests
have the care of souls iu their own name — A parish must have
but one rector — The common law gives the rectors their rights —
The trial of rectors in this country — Who appoints pastors ? —
The clergy are first missionaries, then they become pastors — The
Pope can suppress all dioceses and parishes in any country —
Tl)e appointment of all oflacers in the church — The selection of
rectors for vacant parishes — Monsignors, apostolic, Lotaries, etc.
— TJie removal of pastors only for cause given in the law —
Assistant pastors — Pastoral rights regarding the sacraments —
Marriage laws — The offerings of the people — Financial reports —
Baptismal and marriage records — Duties of the pastor relating to
his people, &c 503-520
CHAPTER XXIV.
THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS.
The religious orders not essential to the church — The precepts and
counsels of the Gospel — The whole church follows the commands
of Christ, while the religious orders follow also his advices —
The religious state the perfection of the christian — The religious
orders strive for perfection — The three chief passions of the soul
— The three vows of poverty, chastity and obedience— The
property of the religious orders — Their mode of living — They
die to the world and live for God — The religious orders founded
on the holiness of the church — Our Lord gave them the example
— The hermits and religious of the early church — The great
fathers of the church were the religious of that epoch — TTie
dioceses and the monasteries of the early church — The secular
and the resrular clergy — The religious orders belong to the
diocese of Home — The approval of religious orders — The novi-
tiate— Breaking their vows and rules — Leaving the community —
A reliifious vocation — Solemn and simple vows — The three vows
of religious — They ciin administer the sacraments to their own
members in every diocese, but not to the clergy or laity without
the consent of the bishop — The religious men of ancient Egypt —
CONTENTS. . 13
St. Antony the father of monks — Where they built the great
monasteries — The hiy brothers — The monk's title at ordination —
The Mohammedans drove the monks to Europe — The monks
unite into associations for mutual protection — St. Augustine es-
tablishes a house of monks at Hippo-^The community founded
by St. Benedict — St. Francis and his followers — The Jesuits,
Dominicans, Lazarists, Christian Brothers, and other religious
orders, &c 551-564
^- .■^■^■
OAii: ^Mtll me gentle reader and
I A\ill show you the Church
of God, the Mother of Christ's
chiklren, the bone of his bone and
flesh of liis flesh,' she was born of
him in the waters of baptism and
blood of redemption, when Christ
slept the sleep of death upon the
cross. ° Let ns see the spouse of
Christ, who brings us forth, as the
" sons of God." ^ " Come and I will
show thee the bride, the wife of the
Lamb." "
Together we will study her di-
vine constitution, her structure, her
organization, her framework, her
head, her different officials, her
rulers and her way of bringing forth her children to Christ her
husband. We will see that wonderful structure built by the
Son of God, that '' House of God,"' that ''Kingdom without
end," " that universal empire of God founded by Christ to unite and
to regenerate the human race.
Sutter fopjusKce salte.
18 'to imitate J.C> on. earth, aad to mentto
reio-a-wdlh Min.in.1ieaveiL.
] Gen. 11., 23.
Apoc. xxi., 9.
2 John xlx., 34.
6 Matt, xii., 4.
3 John t., 12.
« Luke 1., 33.
THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH.
THE BEIDE OF CHRIST. 15
Other writers seemed to have stood as it were on the outside, ap-
pearing reluctant to enter that holy ground, and they described
her from afar. We will go inside, and penetrating into the Holy of
Holies within her, we will describe her wonderous beauties and
perfections, so that the simplest child may see and love its Mother
espoused to our Father, Jesus Christ, our blessed Redeemer.'
" The holy Catholic Church is the beginning and the end of all
things." ^ Her history fills the ages with the glory of her works.
From the dawn of creation to the day of Christ, the Old Testament
was a preparation for her coming, till the end of time all men born
upon this earth will be hallowed by her presence. She alone will
pass through all future ages, nations, peoples, arts, sciences, homes,
hearts. She wall stand by, blessing, refining and giving to each in-
dividual, family, discovery, tribe, and nation her supernatural life
and her providential blessing. But that is not all. After the last
day, the Grod of eternity awaits her to reward her with his everlast-
ing rest. Upheld by Christ, her head, the Church floats over the
ever changing ocean of human events, tossed by the storms of error,
persecuted by the frenzy floods of human passion, or impious men,
attacked on every side, she still remains the guardian of true re-
ligion, and still " she keeps the deposit of faith/' which Christ
gave to the apostles.^
True ark of Noe,* she floats for a time over the waters of false
teaching, till revolutions roused by human passions sweep by, whea
the individuals saved in the Church come forth and people the-
earth with her truths of salvation. Ark of the covenant,^ she heals,
the spiritual diseases of men, and raises up everywhere our fallen
human nature bent by sin. Lucifer and his angels still rise against,
her and always try to destroy her, but like her head she is im-
mortal, for of her Jesus said; " The gates of hell shall not prevail'
against her."®
Of human organizations she alone remains unchanged. Govern-
ments, politics, customs, manners, laws, languages change from
age to age, while she remains eternal as the everlasting truths she
preaches, living on earth an image of the changeless God, who made
her like unto himself, differing from all worldly institutions, she
alone cannot change, for she is an image of the Holy Trinity.
Not a human institution on the face of the globe but which is
young compared to the Church. No society, royal family, govern-
ment, organized body of men but began yesterday compared to the
Church. She lived to see the rise and fall of all the governments
and institutions, which rose and lived since the time of Christ, and
she will stand by at the death and burial of every government
and human institution of to-day. We live amid the ever-changing
world around us. The Church alone stands aloft still young,
and looks down on the crumbling ruins of systems, teachings, states,
institutions buried in the past, her feet on earth, Christ her
head in heaven, eternal years are hers, smiling with the face of
1 Ephes., V. 23-33. 2 gj. Epiph. Adv. Haer. L. I. C. ^ i_ Tim., vl., 20.
* Gen., vil. 6 Exod., xxv. « Matt., xvi., 18.
16 THE BRIDE OF CHRIST.
everlasting youth, she is to-day stronger than ever before, and still
she wears the diadem of truth, holiness, peace, beauty and divinity.
What is the Catholic Church? The Church is Christ himself.
She is his " mystic body,^' * his spouse," " his fulness," ' his *'com-
pleteness.*
The Church is Christ. The Church and Christ form one being.
•"And these three are one."* With him .she is "the beginning
and the end of all." " " In him all things were made and without
him was nothing created in heaven and on earth. ... all things
were created by him and in him." ' Christ is the * Church and
the Church is Christ. " He is the head of the body, the Church."
She is his body. " He is the head of the body, the Church. . . .
that in all things he may hold the primacy."
Let us explain. Three times God came forth from the dwel-
ling of his eternity and acted in time, — at the creation of the
angels at the creation of man and at the Incarnation.
In eternity, the three adorable Persons of the Trinity dwelled
alone, clothed with all the infathomable perfections of the Godhead
— but they wished to show their glories and their perfections to in-
tellectual and reasonable creatures made like unto themselves; for
that they created the angels, one above another, forming nine
heavenly choirs, each a complete race or species in himself,'" each
individual angel having lights and graces according to his wants
and nature. While two-thirds of the angelic hosts remained faithful,
the others rebelled, and with a mighty crash they fell away from God
and plunged themselves into the bottomless pit of that intellectual
darkness and the endless horrors of the loss of God. Thus the first
sin of the angels disturbed the wonderous works of the Creator.
But God will not be frustrated in his works. For the second time
coming forth from his eternity, he made this material world of
suns, and stars, and planets; he clothed the earth with lowest
vegetable life, living beings, the weakest likeness of his own eter-
nal life. He then created the animals to represent in a higher
manner him, the ever-living God. When all was ready he made
*'man to his own image and likeness." " As he continually gener-
ates the divine Son and the Holy Spirit, so man was to generate
others, images of himself, " Male and female made he them, and
then he blessed them saying; increase and multiply." " Man was
a far more wonderful being thaii the angel, and in this respect
at least a more perfect image of his Maker than the others, for man
only generates another person like himself. With a body of clay, a
pure spiritual soul, in him the visible and the invisible, the mater-
ial and the immaterial were united. Increasing by good works
while on this earth, he was made to take the place of the fallen
angels." While God made countless angels, differing one from the
other, each angel a complete species in himself; he made only one
> C0I08.. 1. 24. ' Apoc., xxl. 2. * Ephes., 1. 38. ■• Gal., Iv. 4.
• John. V, 7. • Apoc. xll. 36. ' Col.. 1. 18. » Col., i. 18.
• Col., 1. 76. "> St. Thomas Sum. Theo. >' Gen., i. 86. »» Gen., 1, 28.
" St. Thomas Sum. Theo. Q. zlil. a. 6 ad i, St. AURUstin, Each. C. 29.
GOD REDEEMED MAN BUT NOT DEMONS. 17
human race upon the earth ' ' for God hath, of one, all mankind
to dwell upon the whole face of the earth." ' From that one race of
Adam was to be born a great multitude, each differing in merits
and in graces, as they differ in natural talents, and as the individual
angel differs in species. What the angels got by nature and by
the free gifts of God's grace, the children of Adam were to get
by their merits founded on grace, through their good works while
on this earth. Man was not to die. He was to be carried up
to heaven after his time of probation here upon this earth, and thus
fill the vacant seats or mansions of the fallen angels, that the ex-
ternal glory of the Godhead might be completed by the praises of
his reasonable creatures.
Deceived by the wiles of the serpent, man sinned in his turn, and
again the harmony of the universe was disturbed. For the third
time the Lord came forth from His own eternal being, and repaired
the sin of Adam by the Incarnation of his Son.
In the creation of the angels, God began that series of beings,
which exist outside of and differ from himself. In the creation of
man, he united the material and the reasonable, the physical and
the spiritual beings of the world. But in the Incarnation he
United the creator and the creature. Then he bridged the infinite
distance which separates the finite from the Infinite. Such was the
union of the divine Word with the nature of man in Christ. *
Up to that time, the works of God praised him by the symbols,
types and figures of himself. He saw in them the creatures he had
made to his linage. Then he united them all in the Incarnation say-
ing: " For I myself that spoke, behold I am here.''' In the Incar-
nation, all the works of God were completed; creation received its
crown and the Deity obtains his highest praise.
Twice sin disturbed the harmonies and the beauties of the works
of God. Creation was upset by the sin of the angels and by the sin
of Adam. He damned the angels and redeemed mankind. Why?
We find the reason of that in the very nature of angels and of men.
There can be no sin without knowledge and free will. It is the
very nature of every mind to seek the truth and of the will to seek
the good, the possession of both giving rise to knowledge and to
happiness. But while on this earth men freely seek trruth and hap-
piness and they afterwards change and seek something else. It is
not so in the other life. For there, where all should rest in God,
the created minds fixedly adhere to what they think is right, and
the wills hold fast and unchangeable what they consider good and
happiness. This is founded in the very nature of a reasonable
being, because the minds of men and of angels were made to see
the Truth of the Father, who is the divine Son, and their wills
were created to rest in the Holy Spirit, who is the Spirit of the
Father and of the Son.
Leaving the fallen angels without his grace, he had mercy on
us and he sends salvation to the human race, because our first
» Acts xvU. 26. 2 St. Aug. Epist. 137, n. ii. ^ Isaias, lit. 6.
18 THE WONDERS OF THE INCARNATION.
parents were more deceived than sinning. For that reason he " took
compassion on them and poured forth his mercy upon them," ' and
''The mercy of God is upon all flesh."'' While he treated the
fallen and rebellious angels with the rigors of his justice, all is
mercy in his treatment of mankind, " For thy mercy is great
above the heavens."" "For the mercy of God is upon all his
works." That mercy shines forth through all his creation. But
only dimly did they see it there, till the coming of his Son, the
chosen arrow of his mercy, before whom all the nations were to fall.
Then in the salvation of sinners, there we see the mercy of our God.
Therefore the greatest of God's works, the deepest showing forth
of his mercy, the complete brilliancy of his attributes are seen in
the Incarnation in the God-man Jesus Christ. " The coming of
the Word of the Father, finished the works of creation. ' * He is
therefore the first-born of every creature, '' the Word of the Father
from whom all hang, the Model and divine Plan of every creature.
*'A11 things were made by him and without him was nothing
made that was made." ' All things were created by him and in
him. " He is the principal,' the Head of the Body, the Church." '
He took pity on us, and moved by his infinite mercy, he came
to save us coming " through the bowels of the mercy of our God,
in which the Orient, from on high hath visited us."* For seeing
that in the *' pride of paganism that the world by wisdom hath
not known God, it pleased him, by the foolishness of preaching, to
save them that believed." '" The mercy of God is founded in his
Love, and the Holy spirit is the Love of God. Thus the same
Spirit who moved him to become man, who formed the body of
Christ, who animated him during his life, now the same Holy
Spirit animates the Church, *' the mystical body of Christ.""
The works of God are perfect and therefore he does not repeat.
" He works without repentance," " He does not destroy his works
and make them over again. He destroyed not the bad angels or
wicked men, nor does he take away our liberty and free will.
He leaves demons and wicked men to themselves, till the last great
day of his justice. So he became man and died only once to save
the human race from everlasting perdition. " For by one oblation
he hath perfected for them that are sanctified." " From that one
atonement of Christ upon the cross, flow all the blessings and
the graces, Avhich are showered down on the souls of men. The
channels of these graces are the sacraments. The Mass is the
mystery of Calvary and of the last supper, repeated over again, unto
the uttermost ends of the earth. ** For from the rising of the sun
to the going down thereof, my name is great among the Gentlies,
and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my
name a clean oblation."
The wonders of the Incarnation are around us. The redemp-
> Bccl. xvlll, 9. 2 Ibidem xvlli, 18. » Psal. cvlli, 64.
* St. Atbanasius Orat. 1. contra Arian. n. fse. * Col., i. 15. • John 1, 3.
1 John vll. 25. « Gal. 1, 18. • Luke 1, 78. "• I Cor. 1. 21.
>> Colos i, 18. >> Psalm ciz. ** Heb. x, 14. >« Malachl. i.
Adam's fatherhood. 19
tion in ceaseless unseen streams of graces flow out from him and
fill the world. The Church spreads every where, being one with
Christ, being his body, brings down the streams of graces from
him, her head, and scatters them into every heart and soul
redeemed. " The Church, which was founded in the name of Christ
partakes in his name." ' ' ' The Church being the communication of
Christ, "^ all the members of the church are one with Christ, for
she is one with him, and with him they partake in the divine na-
ture. As we were first born of the race of Adam by natural birth,
so all Christians must be born of the race of Christ, by baptism,
and then fed by his sacraments.
As all men are born of the race of Adam at their birth, so all
should be born of the race of Christ by spiritual birth. As Adam is
the father of worldly men, so Christ is the father of all Christian
peoples. Christ is the second Adam. Let us understand it.
In the beginning by these words " Iiicrease and multiply, " ' God
made Adam and Eve the ministers of the generation of others, im-
ages of themselves. In this they are images of the Holy Trinity
generated one from another. In that primeval order, man would
have been born in a state of grace and perfection. Not only each
individual person, but also society was to be raised to the super-
natural, because of the indwelling of God in each man and in
nature. Adam was to live forever and govern his children, be-
cause he was their father, and had fatherly authority over all the hu-
man race his children. Or he might have been translated to heaven,
while his children lived on earth where they could have remained.
Authority comes from the Author, the Creator, Maker or Generator.
The rule or authority of Adam was therefore founded on his
fatherhood, and it was like unto the fatherhood of God the Father,
over the other two Persons of the Trinity. As the Persons of the
Trinity come from, and are ever coming forth from the Father or
from the Father and the Son together, so from Adam came Eve
and from Adam and Eve were born the children of men. Adam and
Eve, with their children, images of the Holy Trinity, were to form
one race, one country, one Government. Adam the father of them
all was to rule them all by the most venerable authority, of his father-
hood. That was to be a paternal government. In the original de-
signs of God, he was to be the emperor over the whole world, as
his sons were to be the kings and rulers under him. Then they
would not have to choose their rulers, for they would be ruled by their
fathers. That was to be an image of the Trinity, where the Per-
sons of God are ruled by the strictest laws of their own eternal origin.
But sin came, upset and destroyed the authority of Adam. God
cursed the earth. He pronounced the decree of death on Adam and
on his children. By Adam's death the human race lost their natural
head and ruler, then they scattered over the face of the earth and
formed the nations by increasing and multiplying. Whence the
word nation comes from the Latin, natus, born. For the early races
' St. Justin Dial, coin Tryphn. 63. ^ st. Ireneas Con. Hser. ). ili. c. xxv. ii. n. 1. ' Gen. i. 38.
20 CHILDREN OF ADAM AND OF CHRIST.
came from one head and were related. That is why the members of
a nation resemble each other even to our day. By a special provi-
dence, Adam and his sons lived long upon the earth, till the nations
were well established and ruled with stable governments. Till his
death he ruled his children with his fatherly authority. When he
died, his sons took his place and therefore the fatherly, or patriarch-
al form of government was the first established.
With the curse of God on Adam for his sin, came also the promise
of the Redeemer, that from his seed would arise another who would
crush the serpent's head.
At that moment by eternal decree was established another head
for the human race in the place of Adam. He the promised Ee-
deemer was to found a kingdom more wonderful than the universal
empire which Adam lost. The serpent had overcome the first Adam,
but there was to come another Adam , who would crush the serpent's
head. That was Christ, His kingdom is the church. Well then,
St. Augustine exclaims: " 0 happy guilt which merited such and so
great a Redeemer. " '
In the beginning God saw that Adam alone was not perfect. He
could not generate his race alone. For that reason God putting a
deep sleep upon him, took a rib from his side, and from it formed a
woman, his wife. By and through that wife he generated his race,
and without her he could not bring forth his children, images of
himself. What did that mean?
Adam was but the image of Christ. As he was the natural head
of the human race, so Christ is the supernatural head of the christ-
ians. The creation of Eve was but a figure of the formation of the
church. When Christ died upon the cross, impelled by the Holy
Spirit, the soldier Longinus opened his side with a spear, and
there came forth a great flood of water and blood. * Behold the
waters of baptism and the blood of redemption. That moment the
church, the spouse was formed. As Eve was one with Adam, one
bone, one flesh, so the church is one with Christ, her husband. As
Christ is one, with his Father in heaven, so through the church
we are one with him and in him and by him, one with God. " Who
is he that overcometh the world . . . .This is he that came by water
and blood And there are three that give testimony in heaven,
the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost .... and these three are
one. And there are three that give testimony on earth, the Spirit,
the water and the blood and these three are one.'' Thus St. John says
that as the Persons of the Trinity are one with Christ, so Christ with
them and with the church are also one. * Therefore the Holy Trinity
and Christ and the church all form but one, for through the church
we all partake in the divine nature. * As Adam was one in nature
with Eve and with his children, as through her he brought forth his
children, so through the church the Saviour brings forth his chil-
dren his ** sons of God. " *
' Cerem. Bless. Pascbal Candle Holy Saturday. » John xlx, 34.
» I John V. 5, 6. 7, 8. * II Peter i. 4. » John 1. 12.
KELIGION AND POLITICS. 21
At creation the Imman race received from God the right of rul-
ing themselves, but at tJie death of Adam that authority descend-
ed to his children taken altogether. The sons of Adam have
therefore the right of choosing their rulers, the presidents, gov-
ernments, kings or royal houses. They have the right of regu-
lating their temporal matters. That is politics, and by divine
right it belongs to the people of every nation. When they have no
government the authority of Adam descended to the chiefs of
families. But they have not the right of choosing their religion, or
of changing their form of belief; for religion, being the duties of
man to his God, to his neighbor, and himself, no one but God
can lay down the way he is to be worshipped, or the service he
will receive. God will receive only that homage and that worship
which comes to him through his Son, who by the Incarnation
united the Godhead with all creatures. He alone is the bond of
unity between God and man.
For that reason, in states, in governments, and in politics, all
power may come from the people up to the ruling members of the
government, and they elect their rulers. But it is the direct opposite
in religious aifairs. In the Church all power comes down from its
head, Jesus Christ, through the Papacy, through the bishops and
through the pastors to the people. Whence the people do not
choose their pastors, as they did not choose their Redeemer, nor
their fathers, for these were given them by God. The children of
Adam did not choose liim for their father, for the Son and Holy
Ghost in their eternal processions are founded in the divine de-
crees, and in the very nature of the Godhead.
There is no power but from God, whether it comes direct from
him as in the Church, or indirectly through the people to the
rulers, as in politics. It is still the authority of God, and they that
resist it resist God and " and purchase to themselves damnation." '
All other Churches, modeling their organizations after the civil
powers, the forms of governments under which they live, the
people exercise authority in the Church, they put the laity over
the ministers, — the lower over the higher, which is wrong.
The mission of the church therefore upon this earth is to seek
out the scattered children of Adam bending under the heavy bur-
den of sin, sorrow, and death, and to infuse into them the graces
and the infinite merits of her head, Jesus Christ. Sickness, sorrow,
death, and every misery finds its remedy in the Church. There,
in her, all men find saving grace flowing from the wounds of the
crucified Lord. "As we all sinned in Adam so we are all re-
deemed in Christ." "' That as sin hath reigned to death, so also
grace might reign by justice unto life everlasting through Jesus
Christ our Lord."''
To redeem ns, he took upon himself our fallen nature, he
placed his second Person of the Trinity in the place of the human
person natural to us all. Thus he defied us. By that he became
> Rom. xili. 2. 2 jjQQ^ y -20.
22 CHRIST THE HEAD OF THE RACE.
the great high Priest of the whole human race, the eternal Pontiff
of the universe. He offered himself, his life, his death and pas-
sion, his whole being as a sacrifice for all our sins. Whence he
was dead, from his opened side was born che Church which was to
replace the fallen empire of the faithless sinning Adam.
The fatherly authority of Adam was to continue perhaps over
all his children, and last through all ages, for he was not to die.
His was to be a universal, civil, political, and worldly government.
The promised Saviour, came to take the place of the dead Adam
and by the church to rule all nations. The Jews had preserved
the memory of that promise, for they looked for a Messiah who
would make them rulers over all the earth. They expected a
political and worldly power. They could not see in the lowly
Jesus, a king, with all the grandeur they had expected. They
would not believe that he came to establish a spiritual kingdom,
his holy Church, which was to unite the nations in an organization
greater and more perfect than the lost kingdom of Adam.
Cursed by God for the sin of their father, the children of Adam
are blessed by the holiness of their second father, Jesus Christ.
By natural generation they still ** increase and multiply " ' for the
blessings of wedlock were not taken away by original sin, nor
wiped out by the waters of the flood. " The Church, the body of
Christ, meets on ev6ry side the scattered and broken remains of
Adam's children, and she gathers them into her bosom. Through
her Christ brings forth again to life everlaSting those who before
had been born to death. She leads them into the boAvels of the
mercy of our God, who rising from on high comes to us as the
giant of eternity to save from damnation the children of his own
race.
The plans and the model according to which the Church was
built, will not be found on earth, cursed by sin, nor among the in-
stitutions of fallen men. We must look higher for it. In heaven
the Father is the principle who generates the Son, and the Holy
Ghost proceeds from both Father and Son, both together sent the
Holy Ghost into the Church. The Son, sent into the world is
Christ the Redeemer, who in his turn sent the apostles. As God
is the head of Christ, so God sent Christ. As Christ is the head
of the Church, so he sent the Apostles. " As the Father hath
sent me so I also send you." ' He sent them as he himself was
sent with the very same power he received from his Father. " He
that receiveth you receiveth me, he that receiveth me receiveth
him that sent me."*
The church then comes down from the glorious throne of God,
bearing in its bosom and in its structure the very nature of the
deity, being one with God because of her head Jesus Christ, who is
God eternal. The bride of the lamb " she is one bone and one flesh"
with her husband Jesus Christ. Because he is her head, as heat!
and body are one, she is one with Christ. With him she comes
> Geo. i. 28. * Men.. Rom.. Benedictlo Spon. et Spoosse. ' John ix. 21. * Luke xU. 28.
THE FATHER SENT THE SON. 23
down from the Father of lights. ' " And I, John, saw the holy city,
the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared
as a bride adorned for her husband." ^
The Church is rooted in the very nature of the Deity. It is a
copy of the Trinity. The Son was born of the Father before all
ages. " In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with
God. And the word was God." '^ The Father sent the Word, the
Son, into this Avorld that the world might be redeemed by him.
*' And the Word was made flesh and dwelled amongst us." * * ' And
we saw His glory as it were of the only begotten Son of God" " full
of grace and truth. " " Twice born therefore, was the Son of
God — once from his Father in eternity, and that is called His eter-
nal generation — again from his Mother in time, and that is called
his mission. But he never left the bosom of his Father, for he
ever remained the Son of God, even when he became the ''Son
of man."** He still continues his relations with the other Persons
of the Trinity.
The eternal Father sent him into the world, because he is ever
generated by the Father. He with the Father sends the Holy
Ghost into the world, because the latter proceeds from both Father
and Son. The Father sending his Son into the world, invests him
with the sacred character of the Supreme High-Priest of the hu-
man race, to which he united to. and assumed at his second birth.
He anoints him with the Holy Ghost, and gives him " all power
in heaven and on earth." ' He sent him as a priest forever ac-
cording to the order of Melchisedech/' * to take our fallen nature
and redeem it — to offer it as the Victim of the Cross.
But that is not all. As the Father gives rise and origin to the
Son and Holy Spirit, as the latter proceeds from both Father and
Son together, so the Holy Spirit gives rise to no other person in
the Trinity. He, as it were, stands between God and man. To
him was given to form the holy body and soul of Christ. For
Mary, " conceived of the Holy Ghost." " He not only made the
body of Christ, but he dwelled in Him from the beginning, and
during all His life, for, " he was full of grace and truth," " and
the spirit of God ever rested upon him. As the Church is but an
extension of the body and soul of Christ, ''the first born among
many brethren," " so the Holy Ghost animates the whole Church.
He came upon her in fiery tongues the day of Pentecost," Unseen
because he is a spirit, he fills the bride of the Lamb, with the glories
of his indwelling. '^
Sent by his Father, Christ comes down from the eternal heights
of heaven and comes into the earth. He in his turn sends his
apostles, "As the father sent me, so I also sent you." '^ From his
Father he received all the powers of his eternal Priesthood this he
gives to his apostles. " All power is given me in heaven and on
^ I John i. 5. " Apoc. xxl. 2. ^ jo^n 1. 1. « John 1. 14.
* John i. 14. « Matt, xxvili, 18. 7 Ps. clx. 4. « Luke 1. 31.
« John 1.14. 10 Rom. vlii, 29. »i Acts 11. 3.
" Cardinal Manning Internal Mis. Holy Ghost. " jqJjq ^x. 21.
24 THE FINE HIERARCHIES.
earth, going forth therefore teach ye all nations." ' He sends them
in his very own personality, bearing his own sacred character and
the same with the Godhead of his Father. " As the Father hath
sent me so I also send you.'' * " He that receiveth whomsoever I
send, receiveth me, and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent
me." •
Let us go deeper. A hierarchy is a relation of persons one above
another, bound together by the laws of their nature. In God is
the hierarchy of the Trinity, the Father, Son and Holy Ghost,
proceeding one from the other, according to the eternal and un-
changeable laws of their eternal nature. There is another hier-
archy, that of Christ generated from the Father, coming to the
earth and assuming our nature. There is another hierarchy,
that of Christ sending His apostles with His power and
priesthood into the whole world, to preach the tidings of redemp-
tion, that is the hierarchy of Christ and the Church universal.
There is another hierarchy, that of the bishops and dioceses pro-
ceeding from the universal church, and founding other churches,
the parishes, the images of the catholic church from which they
proceed. There is an image of a hierarchy the parish proceeding
from the diocese, but a type of the diocese from which it was born.
In each of these hierarchies we find an image more or less perfect
of the blessed Trinity, after which they were all formed.
God is ever with His Church and living in each of these hierarch-
ies which he made to the image and likeness of God in the Trinity
'• Behold I am with vou all days even to the consumation of the
world." * God is the Head of Christ. ' " Christ is the Head of the
church." * As God sent Christ that is the Messiah, which means
the Sent, so Christ sent his apostles, his Church. " Going forth,
therefore teach ye all nations. ' To save the race he was first born
of a woman like unto other men. " When the fulness of time was
come, God sent his Son made of a woman." * He in his turn sent
his church universal. '' As the Father sent me so I also send you."*
As a wise builder he founded his church in the bond of unity.
" Careful to keep the unity of the spirit, .... in bond of peace
one body, one Spirit, . . . .one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God
the Father of all," *" To keep His church Catholic together, so that
nations would not establish, national or branch churches, he found-
ed the Papacy in the person of Peter, giving him supreme authority
over the other dioceses and churches, mothers of the lambs and
sheep of Christ. " Feed my lambs Feed my sheep." " Until we
all meet in the unity of faith and of the knowledge of the Son of
God .... unto the measure of the fulness of Christ. . . . but doing all
truth in charity, we may in all things grow up in him who is the
head Christ." "
Thus there are five hierarchies flowing from each other down to
> Matt, xxvlil. 18. 19. » John xx. 21. * John xiU. 30.
« Matt, xxvlil. 20. » I Cor. xl. 14. • Eph. v. 28. ' Matt, xxvlll. 19.
« Gal. Iv. 4 » John. xvll. 8. "Eph. Iv. 8. 4. 5. 6. " John. xxU 17.
>- Ibidem. 13. 14. 15.
THE VV^ONDERS OF THE HOUSE OF GOD. 25
earth. One is the hierarchy of the blessed Persons of the Trinity,
of whom the Father is the head; the second of Christ as Man, of
whom God is the head; the third of Christ and the Church universal
of which Christ is the Head; the fourth of the diocese and the uni-
versal Church, of which the Pope is the head; the fifth of the parish
and the diocese, of which the bishop is the head. Such are the
foundations of the Church, the last work of God on earth, the snj)-
ernatural acting in the mind of man, the Trinity living on earth.
With awe and holy reverence let us enter and see the wonders of
the House of God, that temple not made with hands.
mM}^
m^
creatures with their Great Crea-
tor. That Incarnation is the
loving embrace of the finite with
the Infinite. That union of
God and man was to bridge the
chasm of infinity, across which
the fallen children of Adam
were to pass to heaven. In the
Incarnation of Christ the crea-
tion of God was defied. But
the founding of the church was
to be the extension and the na-
tural consequence of the incar-
nation. For the church is the
organization created by Christ
which brings forth, nourishes,
and saves the children of Adam.
CHRIST AND THE CHURCH ARE ONE. 37
As God, Christ is not only the Creator of all things, but by the
incarnation he became also the head of every creature. " All things
were made by him, and without him was made nothing which was
made." ' " He is the head of the whole city Jerusalem, with all the
faithful, from the beginning even unto the end, to which are united
the legions of angels, that there may be one city under one king." '
Creatures were made to the image and to the likeness of God. In
the Holy Trinity, in' the mighty Three in One, in the Family of
heaven ; there we find the plan, the model of the church. The Son
ever coming forth from the Father by intellectual generation, the
Holy Ghost always coming from the Father and from the Son, there
is the pattern of the church. Eve was made from the flesh and blood
of Adam ; their child was born of both and these three were of one
human nature, as the three Persons of the Trinity form one God-
head. There, in the Trinity, we find the type according to which
Christ built his church.
The only begotten Son, sent by his Father into this world, be-
cause he is generated by the Father, that divine Son comes into this
world to seek the scattered members of his race, the children of men
bent and broken by the sin of his father Adam, he seeks his child-
ren, still born of man and woman everywhere coming into the world
bearing the remains of that original sin. The new Adam, Jesus
Christ, forms from his side his bride, his spouse his holy church.
By her he brings them forth, again born of him and of her by bap-
tism his children unto everlasting life. Born of him, he feeds them
on his body and blood, and he nourishes them by his graces given by
the other sacraments. By and in the church, the Son of God as-
sumes them, embraces them, assimilates them and incorporates
them into mystic body, making of them his new body, his own flesh
and blood, building his church of them the sinful scattered children
of Adam. By his church he raises them up to the infinite height of
the championship and society of the Holy Trinity, of which he is
the Second Person equal to the others. " 1'hat you may have fellow-
ship with us, and our fellowship maybe with the Father, and with
his Son Jesus Christ." ^
All perfections of the body are in the head. For tlie head and
the body make only one organism — one living being. As God is
the head of Christ, Christ is one and equal to the Father. As Christ
is the head of the church, so she may be called the one being with
Christ, and by him one being with the Most Holy Trinity. The Son,
the Father and the Holy Ghost are one. " And these three are
one." * The church and Christ are morally one, and these three,
God, Christ and the church are one in this sense.
The eternal Father opens his mind and gives rise to the Son: the
Word of God. " And the Word was with God, and the Word was
God." ^ The side of the Son was opened by Longinus on Calvary
and then the church was born of the waters of baptism and the
blood of Kedemption. ' ' And there are three who give testimony in
1 John i. 3. 2 St. Aug. Innar. In Ps. xxxv. « I. John 1, 3. * I. John ■". 7.
' John. i.
28 WHY THE SON BECAME MA.K.
heaven, the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost. And these three
are one. And there are three that give testimony on earth, the
Spirit, the water and the blood and these three are one." ' That
mystery was before prefigured in the creation of the first man
Adam, on whom God cast a deep sleep, and from his side took a
wife, a spouse, by whom he was to bring fortli his children, an im-
age of the church of God, by whom Christ brings forth his children
unto everlasting life. "
The divine Word, the image of the Father became man for us
sinners and for our salvation, that he might become the father of the
faithful, and bring forth a new race, the christians. The Church
he founded to become the mother of his children. From the
head all perfections flow down into the body, which, with the head
make one living organism. So all members of the church form
with him one mystic body, from him receiving all benefits, graces,
blessings, and salvation, for "^ of his fulness we have all received."'
By the ministry of his priests he brings into his mystic body the
church all souls saved by him. By that he forms them to his own
image, and likeness. " Whom he foreknew, he also predestined to
be made comformable to the image of his Son, that he might be the
first-born among many brothers." * '* God will ever after call them
sons and we will call him Father, because by him, his Son. we be-
come his sons." " Behold what manner of charity the Father hath
bestowed on us that we should be called and should be the sons
of God." * He came for love of us. He died by love, sent by the
Father to die for us. " For God so loved the world as to give his
only begotten Son."' But that was not enough.
To the uttermost ends of the earth, the glad tidings of the re-
demption was to be preached by Christ and him crucified, told to
every tribe and tongue and race and nation, that all mankind might
benefit in the death of Christ. Heaven was opened not only for the
generations or for the people living in the time of Christ, but for all
peoples born into this world unto the end of time. For that great
work he founded and organized his universal Church that in his
place and by his power and authority, she might lead them all up
to himself in heaven.
Christ as God is the Second Person of the Trinity, co-equal with
the others in eternity. In becoming man he united the natures of
God and man in that one Person of the divine Son. In him our
nature was raised to the heights of the infinite Deity. By him
alone are we raised up to be the partakers of the divine nature liv-
ing in the very life of God and in the delights of heaven, " sous of
God by adoption."' ** For there is no other name under heaven
given to men whereby we may be saved." * He is then the only
Saviour.
When the dark shadows of death were closing around the Son
of God, when after the last supper, praying for his whole Church
he said : " Holy Father keep them in my name that they may
» I. John V. 7, 8. » Gen. xl. 21. 22. » John 1, 16. * Rom. vlU. 29. » I. John HI. 1.
* John Ul. 16. "> Epb. 5. " Acts iv, 12.
HOW GOD AND THE CHUKCH ARE ONE. 29
be one as we also are. " ' He prayed not only for the apostles
around him, but also for all the members of the Church till the end
of time, that they might be one with him, and through Him one
with the other members of the Holy Trinity. " And not for them
only do I pray, but for them also, who through their word shall
believe in me. " ' He prayed for the members of his whole Church,
that not only might they be one in doctrine and one in faith, but
that they might be one Church organization Avith him united and
in him, one with the Holy Trinity. "That they may be one as
thou Father in Me and I in thee, that they may be also one in us. " '
From him, then the Church receives the glories of heaven, in
him and by him and from him comes the delights of the divinity^
because by and in him the Church universal is absorbed and raised
up into the divine nature. " And the glories which thou hast given
to me, I have given them, that they may be one as we also are
one. " * God is the head of Christ, by and through the union of God
and man, in the incarnation, God raises up to himself in heaven
all the members of the church. From the state of fallen nature
He elevates them to the unthinkable state of the divine nature, to
their union with the blessed Trinity, to the happiness of heaven,
to the beatific vision of God, to live God's own life, to become the
partakers of the infinite happiness of the Persons of the Trinity, " I
m them and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one." *
Thus the Church is one with Christ, and through Him one with the
holy Trinity. Not only that but God loves the Church as he
loves His only Son. "And the world may know that thou hast
sent me and hast loved them as thou hast loved me. '"' * The Church
being the body of Christ, he prays for his body, that all the
faithful members of the Church visible on earth may be with him;
partakers of his divine nature, partners in his glory, united by
liim to his Father in heaven. "Father, I will that where lam,
they also whom thou hast given me may be with me. " '
The Son of God, the Word or Idea of the Father, the Eeason, the
Plan according to which all things were made was God before the
incarnation, the equal of the other Persons of the Trinity. The
height of God above creation is infinite, and no created mind can
conceive the distance separating creature and Creator. The gift
of grace freely given to Adam and his race was lost by sin. There
sin stood an impassible gulf between God and man. For sin is an
offence against an infinite God; in that it is infinite and required an
infinite price, an infinite and measureless merit to wipe it out. Then
the Son became man. He placed the Person of the Son in the place
of the human person, which individualizes each member of our race.
Thus Christ as God and man was one person, one being, one indi-
vidual with the double nature of God and man. By that ineffable
union, the closest which could exist, man became one with God,
our human nature was raised to the throne of the Infinite, the bond
of creature and Creator was finished, God became our brother, the
» John X. 7, 3. * Johnxvli. 20. ^ jobn xvil, 21. * John xvil, 23. ■» John xvll. S3.
* John xvii, 23. ' John xvii, 21. 34.
30 CHRIST THE SOUBCE OF LIGHT AND GRACE.
chasm of infinity was bridged, the link binding heaven and earth
was made, then the High Priest of eternity was consecrated by his
Father with these words: " From the womb before the day-star I
begot thee . . . .Thou art a priest forever according to the order of
Melchisedech. " '
An honor to one is an honor to all. In the incarnation the human
race received its crown. By his eternal Priesthood Christ offered
his human nature, his body and soul, his life and sufferings as a sac-
rifice to his Father, for the sins of the membei-s of the fallen human
race. God the Son is the grace and light which flow down on
angels. As man all graces and benefits of redemption come from
him by the Holy Ghost, ever coming from him into man. With-
out him, the Word of the intellect of God, no created mind can
reason or think. Being by the incarnation the bond of union, be-
tween God and man, by him, in him, and through him'alone is salva-
tion, as he says '* No one man cometh to the Father but by me." "
The divine Word is the head of Christ. In him the Deity rules
the humanity. God is the head of man in Christ. But it was meet
and just that he might lead the other members of his race up to the
height of his divine nature, that he might make them also partakers
of his eternal happiness and glory, give them the priceless, measure-
less gift of heaven, and lead them into the society and companion-
sliip of his Father and Holy Ghost; *' Father" he says " I will that
where I am they also, whom thou hast given me, may be with me,
that they may see my glory which thou hast given me, because
thou hast loved me before the creation of the world. " * As the
human nature of Christ united to God partakes in the ineffable
and infinite joys of the divine nature in union with the Word in
heaven, so men redeemed become in heaven partakers in the very
life of God, living his infinitely happy life, filled with the super-
natural outpouring of God.
The church composed of men redeemed by Christ, extending to
every tribe and tongue, formed of the brethren of Jesus Christ the
divine Son who became man, she partakes of His human and divine
natures. The Holy Spirit ever coming forth from the Son and
from the Father, he is ever coming from the divine nature of the
Father and of Christ, he proceeds into the world, forming the church,
animating that whole organization of which Christ is the head. By
grace he dwells within us, making us one with him and with Clirist
our head. * The Holy Spirit animates that church, the body of
Christ, somewhat as the human soul animates the body. Christ and
the Holy Spirit are ever in the church. " In that day you shall
know that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you. " ' That
is the consolation of a christian in trials and troubles of this world.
" These things have I spoken to you that my joy may be in you,
and your joy may be filled. " '
God is the head of Christ, Christ is the head of the church, and
these three are one. Such is the burden of our story. We are
» Psalm cix. 8. 4. ■' John xlv. 6. ' John xvll, 84. •• Ephes. t. 5. Rom. xl. 4.
*Johnxlv. 20. • Johnl.lv.
THE PERSONS OF THE TEINITY. 31
one with the church, one with Christ and by him we will be at our
death raised up to the supernatural state of living the divine life
of the most Holy Trinity. That comes through Christ our Saviour.
''Our peace is a sacrifice worthy of God, and the redeemed are
united in the unity of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy
Ghost." '
Let us understand it better. The Father ever looking on his
eternal glories, brings forth his Son, the product of his mind, the
Idea, the Thought, the Word of God." The Word or Son of God
is equal to the Father m all things, for in God all must be infinitely
perfect. For in him can be nothing imperfect. The Son then
<3aunot be less than the other Persons divine. For that reason the
Son is a divine eternal Person. The Father loves the Son. For
the Son is perfect and perfection ever inspires love. The Son loves
the Father, for the latter is also perfect. There comes forth then
from both Father and Son, Love. This Love also must be perfect
for nothing imperfect can be in God, who in every way is infinitely
perfecD. Then coming forth from both the Father and the Son we
find Love, an infinitely perfect Love, and that is the Holy Spirit,
who comes forth equally from both Father and Son. Such is the
■eternal and everliving life of God. His life is the society of the
Persons of the Trinity. From the first the two others have ever been
coming. They are still being brought forth and they will unto
eternity.
To the image and likeness of the Trinity God made each being
and all creatures. The life and the generation of creatures are but
imperfect images of the production of Persons in God. "Shall
not I that make others to bring forth children, myself bring forth
saith the Lord?" ^ To the image and likeness of the Trinity, God
formed his church. The Son being the Thought of the Father, in
him are all sciences, all learning, all perfections which can be. For
that reason all things were made according to him as their model.
*'A11 things were made by him and without him was nothing made
that was made. " * " The first born among many brethren," ^ every
man is but an image of the Man-God Jesus Christ.
But the last work of God's Son is the Church. He founded the
•Church on the model of the Holy Trinity. As we read this book we
will see more clearly how the Church resembles the august Trinity.
In the creation of this world the Son was the counsellor of the Father.
* ' 1 Wisdom dwelled in Council and am present in learned thoughts,
and my delights were to be with the children of men." ^ As math-
ematics are the natural revelations of the Son, so we find all na-
ture ruled by mathematiss. The Holy Ghost was there at creation
as the Mover of matter. " For the Spirit of God moved over the
waters.'" He appeared to Moses in the burning bush, he gave
the ten commandments to Moses on the mount, his glory filled the
temple built by Solomon, he inspired prophets; he came on Christ;
in fiery tongues, he descended on the apostles and that " Spirit of
1 St. Cyprian de Orat. Dom. n. 23. « John 1. 1. 2. » jgaias M. 9. * John. i. 3.
* Rom. viil. 29. « Prov. xxx. 12. ' Gen. 1. 2.
32 THE SON AND SPIRIT OF THE CHURCH.
truth which the world cannot receive. . . . but you shall know him,
because he shall abide with you and shall be in you/' * that
Spirit of Christ proceeding from the Word now vivifies and ani-
mates the Church. " Behold 1 am with 3'ou all days, even to the
consummation of the world." " Then Christ and the Holy Spirit are,
in the Church. One is-the head and the spouse of the Church
the other is her Spirit. The Church is the organization animated
by the Holy Ghost, the Church is the body of which Christ is the
head.
It was not enough for Three Persons of the Holy Trinity ta
dwell alone in their eternal beatitude. Forming th£ heavenly
Family, ever producing and produced they lived in glory. The
Son and Spirit of God left their sacred sanctuary of heaven, sent
by the Father from whom they proceed. " For the Son of man is
come to save that which was lost." ' From the members of the
fallen race, they formed the Church, one with themselves, Christ
as the head, the Spirit as the soul its supernatural life. " And the
word was made flesh, and dwelt amongst us, and we saw his glory,
as it were of the only begotten of the Father."* " I will ask of the
Father and he shall give you another Paraclete, who will teach
you all things and will abide M'ith you forever." * The Son and
Spirit of God embrace the Church. They reside in the souls of her
members. They raise men up to the incomprehensible height of
the Trinity. They give us to live their own very life, and in heaven
where alone that union with God is complete, they give to saints
and angels to live the supernatural life and happiness of God.
"In him was life and life was the light of men." ' The Son came
into this world to give the life of God to the children of Adam,
dead by their father's sin. " I came that they may have life and
have it more abundantly."^
Christ is God and man. Inhimthehumanand the divine natures
united in the second Person of the Godhead. By that incarna-
tion, human nature received all the rights, privileges and merits of
God, for in him God and man form only one jierson. As man is
the compendium of the universe, as we are the mineral, the vege-
table, the animal and the angel all united in one person, it follows
that the universe of God's creation was divinized or completed in
Christ. When he became man, he crowned creation by his in«
carnation. In him the natural and the supernatural unite. He is
the fountain spring from wliich all the supernatural work begins in
God his head and flows down on all creatures of an intellectual
nature, streaming down on both angels and men. In him are all
perfections, holiness, truth, grace. Thus the world cursed by sin,
18 blessed by him. In him the human and tlie divine natures united
in and through his divine person.*
It follows that the divinity rules the liuman in him. The di-
vine nature being infinite, and in him being united to our human
nature, by such a union in one Person of the divine Son, it follows
• > John xtv. 17. ' Math, xxvlll. 20 » Math. x\rliJ. 11. * John 1. 14. » John xlv. 16.
• John I, 4. ' John x. 1<». " St. Thotna.<« Snni. Theolog.
THE EXTERIOR OF THE CATHEDRAL, SIENNA, ITALY.
34 THE CHURCH ELEVATES MANKIND.
that this htiman nature of ours now sits on the eternal throne, one
with God. From the boundless abundance of the perfections of
the Deity, that human nature of Christ showers down his graces
and blessings on manicind by and through the Church, of which
he is the head. He is our head and we are his members. We
form his body which is the church. By baptism we are born
again into the Church his body. From the head the members of
the body receive all life, nerve force, and animation. Cut off a
member from the body and it dies, for it receives no more life
from the head. While united to the Church, we ever receive su-
pernatural life and grace from Christ Her head. When we cut our-
selves away from the Church by infidelity, we are no more in
union with Christ, and if we die in that state, we remain separated
from him in eternity. The soul separated from God forever in the
other life is in hell, for heaven is the union of the soul with God and
hell is the separation of the soul from God in the otlier life. Being
Son of God by nature, Christ gives us to be the Sons of God by
adoption,^ that is partakers of God by the indwelling of the Holy
Spirit. When we are united to the Church he animates us in this
world, then he gives us to see him with the light of glory in the otlier
world which is heaven. " As many as received him he gave them
power to be made the sons of God."' From Christ, the Son of
God and of man, comes to us through the Church, redemption,
salvation, civilization, culture, wisdom, refinement, progress, grace,
peace, all which elevate mankind. From him as God, they flow
down into his human nature by the Holy Spirit, who comes fron>
him and the Father an:3 these benefits are spread by the Church
into all lands and climes. AVhere the Church has spread, there
you find true progress, true civilization, true religion. Where she
has not passed ; men who have forgotten primitive religion, are cruel,
barbarous, uncivilized. For the Church being the body of Christ,
from him her head as God, all members partake in the divine na-
ture, from him receiving grace in this life, and the union and the
vision of God in the other life, of which grace in this life is but the
means and the preparation.
Death came upon us by sin. " For the wages of sin is death.*' *
But Christ was free from sin. In him the divine nature ruled the
human nature, and he could not sin. " Which of you will convince
me of sin?"* His human nature was the most perfect creature
God ever created. He took human nature to redeem the race of
men to whom he belonged. For that was he born. ** For this
was I born" to do the will of God.* " In the head of the book
it is written of me that I do thy will 0 God." ' By his passion he
redeemed human nature from the sin of Adam as well as the sins
of all his children. He merited for us and for himself the glory
of heaven. " Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and
80 enter into his glory? " ^
Not for himself died he, but for all the children of Adam, that
> III John V. 4. « John 1. 12. * Rom. vl. 2. 3. ♦ John vlll. 26, » John xxvlll. 37.
• PHam zxix. 9. ^ Luke xxiv. 26.
HOW CHRIST REDEEMED US. 35
he might satisfy the eternal justice of his outraged Father, God.
" For it becamie him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all
things, who had brought many children unto glory, to perfect the
author of their salvation by his passion.^" Not for himself he
died but for us, " He sanctified himself for them. " * From the
moment of his birth he wished his death. "I have a baptism
wherewith I am to be baptized, and how am I straitened until
it be accomplished ? " ' If he died not, he alone Avould have been
sanctified and entered into his glory, while we would have been
damned. He was the grain of wheat, which falling into the
ground, sprouted forth, grew up and gave rise to many like him-
self, sons of God. * That through the grace of God he might
taste death for all. "' In his death the justice of God was satis-
fied for sin, and the race of Adam was redeemed.
Christ being the Word of the Father, and equally God with him, *
the divine nature of Christ could not suffer. But the divine and
the human natures being in him united in the divine Word, the
second Person of the Trinity, our human nature alone suffered and
died. That human nature had not a human person, but the Person
of the Word of God took its place. The acts and the merits of a
nature belong not to the nature but to the person. In Christ was
the second Person of the Divinity, which individualized that^human
nature common to us all. The merits of Christ followed the
Person upholding his human nature. Then the merits of Christ
followed his Person, and partook of the dignity of that divine and
infinite incarnate Person of the Word of God. Hissufferings and his
merits must then be measured according to the dignity of his
Person. The Person of Christ being infinite, so his merits were in-
finite in value, imiversal in extent and measureless as the divine Son.
One drop of his blood, one moment of pain would have redeemed a
million worlds and races of men. Infinite then are his graces, his
merits and his redemption.
As head of the church, from his merits and from his measure-
less ocean of graces, he showers down salvation on the children of
men. But like all other works of God, the benefits of redemption
come according to regular order. He works salvation only in his
body, the church, that is in the souls which at least by desire and
love belong to his church. His Spirit, who comes forth from him,
saves only in the church, as the soul works only in the body, and
does not animate things outside the body of man. Things not
belonging to a man's body are not animated by his soul, so people
not belonging at least to the soul of the church, the body of
Christ, are not animated by the Spirit of Christ. They are outside
of the pale of salvation. For he saves only his church, for only
those who are united to his Spirit are redeemed, only his body be-
longs to the head.
Such is the teaching of the fathers, those great writers who
gathered up the teachings of the apostles, St. Cyprian says. " The
» Heb. il. 10. ' John xvii. 19. » Luj^g jji, 50. * john xii. 24. 25. » Heb. II. 9.
• John 1. 2.
36 CHRIST BORN THREE TIMES.
Lord said. " I and the father are one," ' and again it is written of
the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.^ " And those three are one " and
who believes that this unity coming from the divine firmness, and
adhering to the heavenly mysteries can be cut away from the
church.^ In another place, he says: " Who so foolisly looks for
discord, as to believe the church can be divided, or dares to divide
the unity of God, . . . the church of Christ ? " ' The writings of
the fathers of the church are filled with such teachings.
He died. Yet death did not have dominion over him.* He
rose from the grave, as from a new birth.* As he died for us, so
he rose for us all, and his resurrection is the pledge and the seal
of our glorious and immortal resurrection from the grave on the last
day. That will be the day, when not only our soul, but also the
body will be immortal like unto his body, now immortal and spirit-
ualized in the everlasting glories of the skies. Thus born of the
Father before all ages, he was also born of his Father the day of his
resurrection. Of that the Father says: " This day I have begotten
thee." By the first birth he is the Son of God ; by the second
birth he is the son of Mary; by the third birth he became " the
first born among many brethren." ' Birth is the origin of a being
in which he receives his nature. In the first birth Christ is the
Son of God, the Word of the Father, in the second birth he be-
came the Son of man by his birth from Mary, but in his third birth
he became the head of the church, the source of redemption for
all the members of his mystic body, his kingdom on earth. "By
that he entered into glory he had with the Father before the world
was."*
His death was for us all. By that death we were all buried
with him in the waters of baptism, by which we become bone of
his bone and flesh of his flesh. For we form the church his spouse,
all we who come forth from him by the waters of baptism and the
blood of redemption. When dead on the cross, his side was opened
by Longinus. Then was the church his chosen people born, as
long before Eve was formed from the side of Adam, to be his
wife and to become the mother of his children. Adam, Eve, and
their children are one fleah and blood, forming one human race.
So Christ and the church are one race, one body, one organization.
At his death he became the father and the head of a new race, of
the christians, who came forth generated by him through the
church his spouse, as before Adam and Eve generated their child-
ren. "Know ye not that all wlio are baptized in Christ Jesus, are
baptized in hisdeath ? " For we are all buried with him by baptism
unto death, that as Christ is risen from the dead by the glory of
the Father, so we may also walk in the newness of life.*
The body of Christ was not made of earth like that of Adam.
But he was born of a woman of our race, that from her he might
take our nature, and by sufferings of that body and soul redeem
our nature lost to God by the sin of Adam. Thus Adam who was
> I. John X. 80. » John v. 7. * St. Cyp- de Unit. Ewl. n. 6. * IWd n. 8. » Rom. v. lH.
• Acts xlli. 82. 83. ' Psalmctx. 7. » Rom. vill. 29. » John. xvli. 5. '"> Rom. vl..3. 4.
HOW THE CHURCH IS THE BODY OF CHKIST. 37
our representative fell for us, and dragged us down, so Christ who
represented us raised us up. We were first born of Adam and we
were next in baptism born of Christ and of the church. " In him
we were born christians. The birth of Christ was the origin of the
christian people, for when the head is born the body is born."' ' In
ascending to the throne of God, at his ascension, he raised us also
up, raised us up who are the body he assumed. He raised us all
up to the same height with himself, and leads us into the compan-
ionship and the society of the adorable Trinity, of which he is the
second Person.'* As the body and the head form one being, so
Christ and church are one. The members of the church with Christ
form one and the same moral being, the same identical organization.
As the head of Christ is God, as the head of the churcli is Christ,
so God, Christ and the church are one. "And these three are
one." '
Christ is the Truth of the Father, while the Holy Spirit is the
Good of the Father and of the Son. The mind of man lives on
truth, for truth is the object of the mind, while the will seeks the
good in creatures. In heaven the mind rests in the divine Son,
and the will rests in the Good, the Holy Spirit. By and through
the Son and Spirit this union begins in this world, and it is com-
pleted in heaven by the Son wlio alone has taken on himself our
nature, and he alone is the bond of union between the creature
and the Creator.
In Christ is the whole church his mystic body. As God loves
his Son with an everlasting Love, which is the Holy Spirit, so he
loves the church this body of Christ with the same love. Therefore
he sends the Holy spirit, the love of Father and Son into the
church, the body of his Son. That church, the Avork of the Holy
Spirit and his union Avith man, began from the beginning of the
race, for the race was made to unite with the Son the "first born
of creatures." The work of the spirit of God in all its fulness
began only at the Incarnation. For that reason he filled Christ
with all graces, for he "was full of grace and truth." As God
loVes his Son, so he embraces his mystic body the church, with his
Holy Spirit, who ever works in the church his creation, according
to the Avords of Christ. " That the love Avherewith thou hast loved
me may be in them and I in them." * That love in us is the Love
of the Father for the Son, it is the Holy Ghost. God loves us be-
cause he made us to the image of his only begotten Son. Made
to his image and likeness, Ave form the church generated from him
in the blood and Avater from his side. Then from him from his
human nature comes the church, Avhile from his divine nature comes
the Holy Spirit, the soul of the church. Then from him comes not
only the visible organism of the church, but also the Holy Spirit,
which animates the Avhole church organism. Then by every right
and way, Christ is the head of the church, her Father, her hus-
band her redeemer, her Lord.
1 St. Leo Sermo. xxvi. n. 2. « St Ignatius Epist. ad Philad. n. 9, » I, John v. 7.
* John. xvii. 2(5.
38 THE WONDERS OF THE INCABNATION.
Up to the incarnation, the Son and Spirit of God lay hidden in
the bosom of the Deity. All things were made by God who wrought
them to his image and likeness. For having in him all perfect-
ions, God could not create what would not be like him. Only dim-
ly did the creatures of this world show forth the wonders of the
Almighty. Slowly prepared the Lord for the founding of his
church. The creation of the angels, the formation of the material
world, the living plants and animals told but dimly of his wonders,
till man, the last of his creatures came the last of his work, man
whom he made to his image and his likeness.
Then began the supernatural creation in man, by the dwelling
of his Holy Spirit. When man fell he promised the coming of his
Son. Brighter and clearer the Son and Spirit appeared in the law
of Moses and in the tabernacle of the Jews. The face of the
Spirit was seen in the ceremonies of the temple; the image of the
incarnate Son was pictured in the priests and in the prophets.
For 4,000 years God prepared the world for the coming of his Son.
Only at the Incarnation did God draw back the veil before his
face and show to man the wonders of his love and of his mercy.
Now both Son and Spirit dwell, not only in the church, but also
in the soul and the bodies of the good members of the church,
the same as the Holy Spirit dwelled in the soul and the body of
Christ. Thus God bends down to earth to lift us up to himself
by the wonders of the Incarnation.
The word Christ in the Greek means the "anointed." For
he was anointed by the Holy Spirit in an invisible way to be the
Saviour of mankind. Because of the Son, the Holy Spirit now
lives in our hearts, that he may anoint them to the image of the
Son from whom he proceeds. *'And because you are sons, God,
hath sent the Spirit of his Son into your hearts crying Abba,
Father;" ' The body of Christ at the resurrection was glorified,
spiritualized and became as near a spirit as it is in the power of God
to change it without ceasing to be a material body. His body passed
through the rock and an angel came and rolled away the stone.
He came through the walls when he appeared to the apostles after
his resurrection. His body being now glorified and spiritualized,
it partakes in the quality of a spirit, and it exists freed from the
imperfections of time and place which belong' to bodies. It is here
and there and in many places at the same time. The Church be-
ing everywhere spread through the world, the church everywhere
finds Christ her head as God, united to the glorified body of the
Lord, vivifying her members and giving grace and supernatural
life to all her children. Christ then is first, the head of the
church universal, and then he is the head of each diocese and of
each parish. He stands, preaches, offers sacrifice, sanctifies
and rules in each church. Complete in each, he showers down
salvation on the members of the whole church on both clergy and
people.
The reader now begins to see our meaning " God is the head of
' Gall. V. 6.
CIIKIST HEAD OF THE HUMAN RACE. 39
Christ/' * ''Christ is the head of the church." * The church and
Christ her head cannot be separated, without destroying the whole
life and being of the church and of Christ. For when the head
separates from the body, both head and body die. For the body
nourishes the head. " But Christ rising from the dead dieth no
more, and death shall no more have dominion over him." ' To
him the Father gave all the nations of the earth. " Ask of me
and I will give thee the Gentiles as thy inheritance." * From the
scattered race of Adam, the church then takes them in, and as it
Avere nourishes them and repairs by them the loss of death; then
by those converted and baptised she makes up the loss. Christ
buried them with him in baptism. He carried them even to the
rigors of his death and passion, but now he lifts them up to the
glories of the divine nature. " But God .... even when we were
dead in sin hath quickened us together in Christ, and hath raised
us up together in heavenly places through Christ Jesus."* He
drank to the dregs, the cup of all human sorrows, to hallow and
sanctify with heavenly merits all the sufferings of the members of
the church. ''All the children of the church are distinct by lapse
of time, but tiiere is one band of the faithful, crucified with Christ
in his passion, reawakened in his resurrection, in his ascension
placed at the right hand of the Father. '' °
Behold therefore Jesus Christ the great High priest of the whole
human race, of whom the Father said : " Thou art a priest forever
according to the order of Melchisedech; " ^ behold him anointed
by the Father with the Holy Ghost, he comes into this world to oifer
his life, his body and his whole being for a sacrifice of peace and
reconciliation to his Father for the sins of the whole race of Adam;
a race Avhich he assumed and took to himself at his incarnation.
He, the last chosen gift of the love of God to man, he said the
offerings of the Old Testament became unpleasing to thee my
Father then " Behold I come." ® He comes to become the head of
the whole race in the place of Adam, who by his sin had lost his
headship. He came to unite the children of Adam in anew organ-
ization, the church his kingdom, different from the union of nations
in which we were born. He came to become the head and the
father of a new race born of him, by the waters of baptism and by
the blood of redemption ever flowing from his side. Innocent and
beautiful above the sons of men, alone born of a virgin, he took
upon himself our sins, our iniquities, and he was stricken by his
Father " and bruised for our sins." ' " God spared not his own di-
vine Son, but delivered him up for us all." '" God and man, head
of the church, he gives the glories of his Godhead to the members
of the church united to him by innocence. " And the glory which
thou hast given to me, I have given to them, that they may be one,
as we also are one." "
Then the Church is the kingdom of Christ. He takes the place
1 Cor. vl. 3. 2 Ephis. v. 23 ' Rom. vi. 9. « Psalm JIJ. 8.
* Epis. il. 4, 5, 6. " St. Leo Sermo 26. n. ' Psalm civ. 4. s Psalm xxlx. 8.
' Isaias. '" Romans vlil. 32. n John xvli. 22.
40 CHRIST THE ONLY KEDEEMEE.
o£ Adam as our new father. As God, he reigns supreme in heaven
over angels and saints, us man lie is the head of the church. The
ministers of the church teach, sanctify, and rule in his name and
by his power. " And I dispose to you, as my Father hath disposed
to me, a kingdom, that you may eat and drink at my table in my
kingdom, and may sit upon the thrones judging the twelve tribes of
Israel." ' Thus Christ established the episcopal thrones through-
out the world wherever his kingdom has spread. One with him,
and in him, one with God, the church has the same authoi'ity with
him and with God. In spiritual teachings, in matters of religion,
the church teaches the doctrines of Christ. People listening to
her, receive the words of truth coming forth from Christ. " lie
that heareth you heareth me, he that despiseth you despise th me." '
The baptized members of the church born of Christ, form the
Church united to Christ. When they commit a mortal sin they cut
themselves off from Christ. No mqre are they parts fully alive of
his mystic body. Outside the church there is no ordinary way of
salvation. Only through Christ do souls go to heaven, for there is
but one kingdom of God, one house of the Lord, one fold and
one Shepherd, and one only Redeemer, Jesus Christ, by and
through whom only are the souls of men redeemed and saved; and
to him; "To the king of ages immortal, invisible to the only God
be honor and glory forever more." '
1 Math. xlx. 28. " Luke x, 16. ' I. Tim. i, 17,
OD the etei-nal Father is
head of the Son. From
eternity the Son is gen-
erated by him. All
the Father has he gives the
Son. The Son partakes with
him in his divine nature, and
with him the Son is equally
God Almighty. "In the be-
ginning was the Word and the
Word was with God and the
Word was God.'" The Son
is God because he receives
his divinity from the Father.
From him he comes and the
Father is his head. As the
Father is the head of Christ
the Son or Word of God. so Christ is the head of the church. The
church comes forth from Christ, as Christ comes forth from his
Father. As the Son and Father are one, so Christ and the church
are one, nature and divinity. All the Father has he gives his only
begotten Son, all that Christ has he gives his church. As the Fa-
ther and the Son are one, so Christ and the Church are one. As the
' Johnl. 1.
it
Eternal fclicily is th.e lasf metcjrwlicli. shaU
rid us of all evils, and oivc us all ricKes,
tuuisi tfcfcUlMi Mis i't.uj-Lt. ii.N iiiK. SACRAMENTS.
THE CHUECH COMES FKOM HIM. 43
Son is equal in power and might and nature to the Father, so the
church has the very same nature and power with Christ over the
souls of men, over the ways of preaching, over the spiritual ruling
of mankind, over the means of salvation. To disobey the church
is to disobey Christ, who is God the Son, the Word of God. " He
that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth
me and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me." '
When Christ became incarnate, he espoused our fallen nature,
then he was united to that soul and body formed in the
Virgin, and from that moment God and man united never to sepa-
rate. From the moment of his death, when his side was opened,
when he generated the church, from that time he and the church
cannot be divided. As the Father is his head so he is the head of
the church, and now he presides in the glories of the skies, as head
of that part of the church made of the saints and angels ever bask-
ing in the beatific vision of the Deity. Their souls are now filled
with the Truth of God, the divine Son, their wills are now filled
with the Good of God, the Holy Ghost. On earth Christ is the
head of church, composed of the saints not yet made perfect,
awaiting their delivery from this body of death, dwelling amid the
miseries and the troubles of this life. He is also the head of all
the souls in that other place now held by little sins awaiting the
day of their delivery. Then he is head over all the church.
" God hath made him head over all the church, which is his body,
and the fulness of him." ^ By him we partake in the divine nature,
by grace in this life and by glory in heaven, "For we are all
made partakers of Christ." ' As partakers in his nature we live in
him and he lives in us.
The action of the Son and of the Father are to produce the Holy
Spirit. The action of Christ in us is to give the Holy Ghost into
our hearts. As the Family of Heaven, the Holy Trinity, dwell in
everlasting peace subordinate to each other, in as far as one comes
from the other, according to the laws of their own eternal proces-
sion, as Christ is subject to the Father, who sends him into the
world, then the church is obedient to Christ from whom she is
ever coming forth by the water and the blood. * ^Nothing irregular
can be in the Trinity. All is also harmony and order in the
church. The side of Christ ever opened, the waters of baptism, the
blood of redemption continually flow down upon the church, wash-
ing men from sin, sanctifying the heart, lifting souls up to God
raising them up to heaven through Christ his only Begotten. That
vast organization the church born of him, and an image of Trinity
ever coming forth from him her generator, that church spread
through the world is regulated by the laws made by the Holy Spirit. ^
The Holy Spirit gives rise to no person of God. But he forms
another organization from the members of the fallen human race.
It is the Church which now he rules as the Father governs the Son
made man, as the Son presides over the Church, he brings forth
from the sufferings of his passion.
1 Luke X. 10. - Ei)h. i. 22, 23. ^ Heb. ii. 14. * John xii. 34. " I. John v. 7.
44 CHRIST THE HEALER OF NATIONS.
Behold then the wonders of God. In nature "we see liim as the
autlior of nature, as the one God represented by every act of crea-
ture, made to the image of the divine Son. But there we see him
only in the unchanging laws of nature. But the Son comes down
to earth, he becomes man by a miracle of birth, and by that he re-
veals the three Persons of the Trinity, the hidden supernatural
life of God, which no created reason unaided could have found
unless it had been revealed. Then he founds the Church,
wherein he continues the Avonders of the supernatural, the sublime
life of the Trinity. Grace bought by his death becomes from the
beginning of the world the medicine for the healing of nations,
the salvation of mankind, sitting in the darkness of death, the soul
is raised to a supernatural state by grace, peoples are taught, sanc-
tified, they are baptized and civilized by the preaching of the Gos-
pel, heaven is open to fallen man, and God becomes so familiar with
us, and raises us to the wonders of his own divine nature in the
heavens.
Christ did not come himself alone. He was sent by his Father
who now and ever generates him. Sent by him he comes to be-
come tlie great high Priest of eternity to offer sacrifice for the
whole human race. " For Christ also did not glorify himself that
he might be made a high priest.*' *
He was sent by his Father the head of the Trinity from whom
he ever proceeds in eternity. The Holy Ghost did not come into
the world of himself. He was sent by the Father and by the Son
by one of the eternal principles from whom he proceeds. ' Christ as
the head of tiie Church, sent his apostles into the world to found
the Church. "As the Father hath sent me so I also send you.*' *
Coming forth from him, their Father Christ, by baptism and by
Holy Orders, bearing his eternal priesthood, they went forth in-
to the whole world, to build the Church in every land formed
out of the scattered children of Adam. "Going forth therefore
teach ye all nations." * '"' All power is given me in heaven and on
earth.'' " He that believethnot shall be condemned." " They were
the twelve foundations of the heavenly Jerusalem, the Church of
God— his " kingdom on the earth." " 'He brought them forth up-
on the cro.ss by the waters of baptism and the blood of his redemp-
tion ' " And these three are one." " They were the first born of
the Church, they were one with him and through him one with his
Father. " He that heareth you hearetli me. He that despiseth
you despiseth me and he that despiseth me, despiseth him that sent
me."'
But that was not enough. The members of the Church, his
children were to be nourished not by a mother's milk but by their
Father's flesh and blood. " I am ,"" he says, "the living bread,
which came down from heaven." "* The Church not only comes
forth from liim, as he does from his Father, but it is also nourished
by his flesh and blood, that from him, her head, she may receive
' Heb. V. 5. 2 L„ke xxlv. 49. ' John xx. 31. * Mnth. xx. vltl. 19. » Mark xvl. 16.
• Lukexxli.29. ' Johu x. 11. » John v. 7. » Luke x. 10. '" John vl. .'>!.
HOW CHRIST FED HIS CHILDREIST. 45
eternal life. " This is the bread which cometh down from hea-
ven, that if any man eat of it he may not die." ' Those who are
born of the race of Adam, are supernaturally dead. They have
no supernatural life in them. " Your fathers did eat manna in the
desert and are dead." "^ From the head the members of the body
receive all their life. " I am," he says " the living bread, which
came down from heaven. If any one eat of this bread, he shall
live forever."^ "And the bread that I shall give is my flesh for
the life of the world."* From him comes all vitality in the Church.
Those who eat him not, die the death of sin, as without him they
cannot resist the temptations of this life. " Except you eat the
flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood you shall not have life
in you." ^ Without food to nourish it the body dies. Without
Communion the soul soon dies by falling into sin. " Not as your
fathers did eat manna and are dead. He that eateth this bread
shall live forever." ° As the head is the source of life for the body,
so Christ is the head of the Church. He is the source and the foun-
tain of all supernatural life for the Church his body, for all her
members who form the Church his mystic body.
The head and body are one, Christ and the church are one.
''He that eateth my flesh and driuketh my blood abideth in me
and 1 in him."' As he receives his divine life from the Father,
as he lives by and in his Father, so he gives that divine life to his
church, which proceeds from him. "As the living Father hath
sent me and I live by the Father, so he that eateth me the same
also shall live by me."* Being head of the church, where the'
head is, the body there is also, there shall the body be glorifying,
in the everlasting life of the head, Christ. " He that eateth mj
flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life and I will raise
him up on the last day."* When we eat, by digestion the food is
changed into us. But it is the opposite in eating and drinking
the body and the blood of Christ. " For we do not change him into
us, but he changes us into himself." Head and body being one
in nature and in being, he wishes to make us all perfect like him-
self. For that he gives himself to us in Communion, that he may
change us into himself, and make us perfect and glorious like unto
himself, that the church his body may be in all things like unto
him her head. He is the head of all, the '' Prince of Peace," the
"Lion of the Tribe of Judah." By his strength the martyrs suf-
fered, the pastors rule, the virgins remained chaste, the persecuted
got strength, the saints triumphed. From him come ceaseless
streams of unseen vivifying grace, his redemption into men; from
him the head flowing down upon all men, they penetrate into every
cell, fibre, soul, member, family, race and nation, conveying to all
the supernatural divine life of God, attracting them to him, mak-
ing them ready for the eternal joy and bliss he now enjoys with
his Father in the splendors of the skies that he may have " a glori-
ous church without spot or stain or anything of this kind." '"
iJohnvi. 50. 2 John vi. 49. » John vi. 49. « John vi. 57. * lb. 54. • lb. 59.
T lb. 57. Mb. sa » U). 55. ■<> Ephes. v. 27.
46 THE FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH.
God and man became one person in two natures in the wonders
of the incarnation, being united in the one heavenly divine
Word of God. Christ as man is now one with God. As head of
the church, the church is one and the same with God, and takes
her place high in heaven with the members of the Trinity. By
and in the church then, we rise to that ineffable union with the
Father Son and Holy Spirit. By and through Christ we enter
heaven, we rise to the companionship of these heights of the divin-
ity, we partake of happiness which not a man on earth can now
conceive. What wonders see we now before us. Who will give us
light to penetrate the mysteries of the incarnation and of the
church he founded for the saving of souls?
Centuries ago, on the banks of the Sea of Galilee, might be seen
a little band of fishermen. They are the followers of Jesus.
Not from the proud families of imperial Eome, nor from the
aristocratic nobles of Jerusalem, but among the rough men of
Galilee he chose his apostles, to show that he and not man did the
work of establishing the church. He chose these twelve apostles as
the foundations of his heavenly Sion. Under them he placed the
priests and ministers when he chose his seventy-two disciples.
But the crown the completion was the Papacy in the person of Peter.
*' There were laid the house of eternity built by Wisdom." * " Its
foundations are in holy mountains, for God hath loved Sion the
church more than the tabernacles of Jacob." " As a wise builder,
he raised his structure not on the moving sands of time but on the
immortal primacy of Peter. " Thou art Peter and upon this rock
I will build my church." '
The people united to their pastors, the pastors united to their
bishops, the bishops in union with the Papacy, the Pope one with
Christ heir of Peter the foundation stone * — there is the church —
there is the body in union with her head. These are one according
to the prayer of the Saviour before his passion, " Holy Father keep
them in thy name whom thou hast given me, that they may be
one as we also are " ' They were one with him and with the
Father. We his followers, the members of the body of which he
is head, we are all one with him and with his Father. *'And not
for them only do I pray but for them also who by their word shall
believe in me."* By Adam's sin the world was cui-sed and the
race doomed to eternal perdition in hell. Christ prays not for the
world which was damned by sin, but only for the members of his
church. ** I pray not for the world, but for them whom thou hast
given me." ' All he had, he received from his Father from whom
he proceeds. From his Father he received his personality and
the saving words of truth. All he received from his Father he
gave to his church, for what the head has it gives to the body.
" The words which thou hast given to me I have given to them
and they have received them."' What he gave them, the tidings
of salvation, he told them to preach to the ends of the earth; "Go
• ProT. U. 1. « Psalm IxxxyL 1. » Math. xvl. 18. * Math. vll. 25. » John xvU. 8.
* Jotan ZTlL SO. 1 John xvil. 9. • John xrii. 9.
THE PRIMAEY TRUTHS OF RELIGION. 47
ing forth therefore teach ye all nations, teaching them to observe
all things whatsoever I have commanded you/'' They spread his
Gospel into every land and clime. Their words were heard in
every tongue as the Psalmist says of them. "There are no speeches
nor languages where their voices are not heard. Their sound
hath gone forth into all the earth."' '
He is eternal Truth. From the Father he receives all he has and
he gives it all unto his church. He received the truth from the
Father, and he gave it to the apostles and by them to his church.
From the world he chose the'm as his friends and gave to them his
truth, which he received from his Father. " I have called you
friends, because all thingo whatsoever I have heard of my Father
I have made known to you. " ' He taught them the truth of the
Father. " The things therefore that I speak, even as the Father
said unto me so do I speak." ' All the truths are eternal and im-
mortal like to the Son of God, of which they are so many mighty
images. That which is eternal cannot be destroyed. So it is with
the teachings of our Lord. They will last till the end of time and
unto eternity.
Take the truths of the multiplication table, or the sciences of
mathemetics. They can never be destroyed, nor can they be changed
by man; for they are so many natural relations of the divine Son,
the Truth of the eternal Father. No matter how bad be the
lives of men, they cannot corrupt these immortal and eternal
truths. So with the truths the Son of God revealed to the
•church through the apostles. Like himself they are immortal un-
changeable,because eternal. Therefore we see how foolishly some
speak, who think that the church could or did change during all
the centuries of its existence since the time of Christ, for he said
*' Behold I am with you all days even to the consummation of the
world. " * The church is composed of all the immortal truths re-
lating to God, his nature, his works, the way man was redeemed.
The United States is the constitution or the frame-work upon
whose laws all the states are built. The people for a hundred years
might be bad, still they could not corrupt that constitution of the
country, for their lives would have nothing to do with these writ-
ten laws. So it is with the church. It was formed by the Lord,
its head. He built her upon these revelations given to the race by
the prophets, till at length he finished all by his coming, and all the
Popes, bishops, and priests in the world could not change one iota
of the truths revealed to the human race by the Son of God. They
are the immortal unchangeable treasures of the church. To her in
the persons of the apostles he said. " Teaching them to observe
all things whatsoever I have commanded you, and behold I am
with you all days even to the consummation of the world." " The
church therefore, like her founder and her head, ever lives unchange-
able and immortal like unto the eternal truths upon which he
founded her. Things which change soon decay. Thus the pass-
> Psalm xviil. 4, 5. « John xv. 15, 16. 3 John xii. 50. * Math, xxviil. 80.
« Math, xxvili, 20.
48 THE CHURCH IS A QUEEN^.
ing things of this visible world cease to exist, because they
change and pass away. But not so with the church. For no one
can change the revelation made by God to her. He as ever lives in
her guiding and directing. " Behold I am with you all days even
to the consummation of the world.'"
In God there is no change, for he is the immutable and un-
changeable Deity, " Christ the same to-day and forever." ' We re-
ceive eternal life and nourishment from him. But as in the human
body takes place a continual change by assimilation, nutrition, and
waste, parts are being thrown out and new materials are taken in
by digestion, so in the church. The old members die, new ones
are born to take their place, while they too in their turn will pass
away to give their places to the coming generations. But the
church our Mother, who brought us forth to Christ, she dies not
like her members, for she partakes in the immortality of her
husband, head, and founder Jesus Christ.
Christ is the head of the church that is the burden of our storv.
He is a king and she is his kingdom. For that he was born of
the kingly tribe of Juda and of the royal house of David, for he
came to be " The Prince of the house of David " ' to reign forever
in the splendors of heaven. The church therefore is the Queen of
his kingdom, which is to last to the end of time. " Of his king-
dom there shall be no end.'"" His father gave him that kingly
authority that he might give it to his church. " I dispose to you
as my father hath disposed to me a kingdom. That you may eat
and drink at my table in my kingdom, and may sit upon thrones
judging the twelve tribes of Israel." *
In various parts of the Holy Scriptures we find mention of
the kingdom of God, of which the Son of God is the king. That
was not a worldly kingdom as he said **' My kingdom is not of this
world."' The Jews expected that when the Messiah came he
would found for them a world wide kingdom, extending to the
uttermost ends of tlie earth. That kingdom so often mentioned
in the Bible, is the church of God, the spiritual rule and govern-
ment of Christianity, at whose head is Jesus Christ himself. Was
it not providential that he was crucified as the "' King of the
Jews?" ' for was he not the King of kings and the Lord of lords ? '
The church being therefore the Kingdom of God, it follows that
she has the same power as Christ. The church our mother rules
as the spouse, as the body and as the kingdom of Christ. For
that reason he said, "He that heareth you heareth me, and he
that despiseth you despiseth me, and he that despiseth me despis-
eth him that sent me."* A rebel against the government is
driven out from the protection of the laws, and if lie continues in
his insurrection, he is justly put to death. So it is with those wha
rebel against the church. They end in infidelity and in damnation,
because Christ still reigns in the pereon of his ministers. " There
is no power but from God, . . . and he that resisteth, resisteth to
» Math, xxvlll. 80. « Heb, xHl. 8. » Luke I. «. * Luke 1. 38. » Luke xxll. 29, 30.
• John xvUl. 36. ' John xlx. 19. » Apoc. xxll. U. » Luke x. 16.
THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH. 49
himself damnation" ' Being one in very life being and aifthority
with Christ, he reigns in and through his church. She has all his
power and authority, *'A11 power is given me in heaven and on
earth. Going forth therefore teach ye all nations" ' "He that hear-
eth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me." '
Only to Peter and to his disciples did he say "Going forth therefore
teach ye all nations." * The clergy therefore are the teaching church,
while the people are the listening and the believing church. Christ
has gone to heaven; He cannot now be seen by bodily eyes, but be-
fore he went he founded his church on the apostles and on their
successors, and gave to them that divine commission to " teach all
the nations" of the earth. Christ is the head of the universal
church. Unseen, immortal and eternal like him its founder and its
head, the universal church fills the world.
While Christ is the head of the universal church, and he alone
presides over it, at the same time he rules and presides over the dio-
ceses and over the parishes in the persons of the pastors, who rule in
his name and by his authority. Thus in the bishop of Rome, the
chief and central diocese of the whole church, there especially Christ
rules his church in the person of Peter his vicar, to whom he said
"Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church." The
Lord Jesus is the head of each diocese, and he rules it in the person
of the bishop, who in a lower and a feebler way than the Eoman
Pontiff represent to clergy and people Christ, the head of the uni-
versal church. Again he is the head of each parish and the people
see him in the person of their pastor. In his voice and in his per-
son they see the form of the Son of God the shepherd of our
souls.
The universal church is like to God. In God, the Father
generates the Son, who comes forth from the Father to the earth,
bearing in his person all the perfection of the Father. In the
church the diocese comes forth from the universal church, with
some of the necessary perfections of the whole church. Again
from the Father and the Son proceeds the Holy Spirit, with all
the perfections of the other two Persons of the Trinity. So from
the universal church and from the diocese come the parish with
the riches and perfections and graces and the sacraments of the
whole cliurch and of the diocese. But we must not expect to find
any perfect image of the Trinity in creatures. As from the
Father only comes the Son, so from the universal church alone can
come the particular church the diocese. As from Father and the
Son proceeds the Holy Spirit, so from the whole church and
from the diocese comes the establishing of parishes. The Persons
of the Trinity proceed from one another in a regular manner,
in conformity with the eternal laws of their common divinity. So
the ruling of churches, the erecting of diocese, the establishing
of parishes must take place according to the laws laid down by
the canons.
Christ is the head of the universal church. He rules her bv
» Rom. xlll. 2. ^ Matt, xxxiii. 18, 19. ^ Lm^g, ^ 16. * Matt, xxxlll. 19.
50 THE CHURCH THE CITY OF GOD.
the Pof>e his Vicar. He speaks to the world by him. In him the
universal church is centralized and undividualized, Christ is the
head of the particular church the diocese. He rules it by the
bishop, who stands at the head of the hierarchy of holy orders.
The bishop is one of the successors of the twelve apostles. The
diocese lives, moves, and has its being in the universal church, of
which it is only a great parish or member. Christ is also the head
of the single church the diocese and the parish. The pastor is one
of the successors of the priest, and ministers ordained by Christ. *
The parish came from and was born of the diocese, as the latter
was in its turn, born or came from universal church. Clirist is
the head of the parish? To him each soul in the parish is as dear
as the apple of his eye. He died for that particular soul as well
as he died for the whole human race. Thus we see the wonders
of the mysteries of the headship of Christ over all the church.
Here shines forth the greatness of the church of God " the Spouse
of Christ, our spotless Virgin Mother/' who every day brings forth
her countless children, sons and daughters of our father God. Mother
of all living, bearing the same relation to Christ as Eve did to
•Adam, she the church is bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh.
As the husband is the head of the wife, so Christ is the head of
our holy Mother the Church. As he is the spiritual King of the
human race in the place of Adam, so the church is the Queen
over all the races and nations of men.
How glorious is that city of God sitting on the mountains of
eternity, founded on the unchangable truths of God,- built on the
apostles whose sun and temple is the Lamb without spot. It
comes down from the Father of lights through Christ the Son
of God, streaming down from the eternal heights of glory, it comes
into this M'orld to seek suffering souls, which were being lost.
From Jesus Christ her head she receives all truth holiness good-
ness, power and authority. Her glories are only for him her
spouse, that he might freely give his glories to us. "' I John saw
the holy city tlie new Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from
God prepared for her husband." " By and through her all the lost
children are restored to our inheritance we lost in Adam. " And
I heard a great voice from the throne saying. Behold the taber-
nacle of God with men, and he will dwell with them, and they
shall be his people and God himself shall be their God."' '
But not every one who belongs to the visible church will be
saved. Only those, who free from sin united to Christ and who
persevere in that state, only these shall be saved. " He that shall
overcome shall possess these things, and I will be his God and he
shall be my son. " * Thus that, holy church is formed of the
saints made' perfect, "built only of those sanctified and washed in
the blood of the Lamb slain from the beginning of the world. " '
She rises from the earth, and penetrating the very skies, she en-
ters the secret sanctuary of the Holy Trinity, she takes her place
> Council Trld. Sera, xxlll. Can. vi. * Apoc. xxl. 1. ' Apoc xxl. 8.
* Apoc. xxl. 7. • Apoc. xUl. 8.
k
52 THE HOLY SPIRIT WORKS SALVATION.
as a member of, and in co-partmentship and in equality with the
Persons of the Trinity. " Blessed are they that wash their robes
in the blood of the Lamb . . and may enter in by the gates of the
city. " * Outside the soul of the church are the remains of the fallen
race of Adam, bending still beneath the curse of the original sin, in
which all were born. No salvation comes to them , for they do
not belong to the body of Christ, '' Without are dogs and sor-
cerers, and unchaste and murderers and servers of idols, and every
one that maketh a lie." " That is outside the church there is no
salvation for fallen man. For the church being the bride, or spouse
of Christ, by her he brings forth his children. Being his body, his
Spirit, that is the Holy Spirit does not work salvation outside his
body, no more than the soul of man works outside his body. For
that reason, those who do not belong at least to the soul of the
church, or bodyof Christ they do not belong to him, and they cannot
be saved. For salvation is the taking up, the raising up into the
Divinity of the fallen members of the race of Adam.
Christ is the fruitful source of all grace and redemption for men.
He works the salvation of mankind through the sacraments by the
indwelling of the Holy Ghost, who proceeds from him into the
souls of men. ^ While Christ, from whom the Holy Ghost proceeds
died for all men, it is the same Holy Ghost who sanctifies men.
He carries out the work of redemption in the world by the
church, which he inhabits. " Because the Word is in the Father
and the Spirit is given by the Word, therefore he wished that we
would receive the Spirit: then having the Spirit of the Word ex-
isting in the Father, we would seem through the Spirit to become
one with the Word and through him one with the Father. " *
What a wonder for the mind of man to contemplate us one with
the members of the Holy Trinity. To live the very life of God!
To ascend to the heights of the incomprehensible Godhead! Men
are all ambitious, proud. They ever strive for something higher.
Here they can satisfy that natural longing for the betterand for the
higher. The Holy Ghost as St. Basil says *' is the character of
the Son " stamped on us. *
That redemption of Christ began on the*cros8 the Holy Ghost
still works in us by the church his organ. Through the clergy
he speaks to the world, and teaches men the way of salvation.
He placed the pastors over the people. To rule the Church of God
which he hath purchased with his own blood. "' '* Through Christ
its head, by and in the Holy Ghost her soul the church is united to
the Trinity and the members ofthechiirch partake while on earth
in that fellowship of the two Persons of the Trinity, and they are
sanctified by the Holy Ghost. '' ** The Spirit completes all that God
did through the Son .... nor can the Trinity receive any separation.
As the Son receives from the Father to be one with nim, and to
be with him the one of the principle from whom proceeds the
Holy Ghost, so in his mission to the earth to save mankind he
also retains that quality or power of sending the Holy Ghost! "
> Apoc. xxii. 14. * Apoc. xxli. IS. > John xx. 23. * St. Atbanas. Orat. iU. contra Arianos.
* St. Basil adv. Eunoin L. V. * AcU xx 28.
SENDING THE HOLY GHOST. 53
As he sent his apostles, he also gave to them and their succes-
sors to send the same Holy Ghost into the hearts and souls of men.
Thus the clergy partaking in the Priesthood of Christ, like him
they send the Holy Ghost. Thus as Christ said to his apostles
when sending them with the powers of the priesthood: ''Receive
ye the Holy Ghost, whose sins you shall forgive they are forgiven,
and whose sins you shall retain they are retained; " ' in the same
way the clergy sends the same Holy Ghost into the hearts and the
souls of men. At the consecration of a bishop the consecrator and
the assisting bishops impose their hands on the newly consecrated
bishop saying. " Receive the Holy Ghost. ^"* At the ordination
of a priest, the bishop imposes his hands on the head of the young
priest saying the exact words of Christ when sending his apostles
into the whole world. "Receive ye the Holy Ghost whose sins
etc.^' '' At the ordination of a deacon the bishop imposes his hands
on the head of the young cleric saying: "Receive thou the Holy
Ghost for strength to resist the devil and his temptations, in the
name of the Lord.^' * At the ordination of the subdeacon the bish-
op prays that the Holy Ghost may come down on them: "May
the Spirit of wisdom and of knowledge rest upon them, the Spirit
of council and of strength, the Spirit of science and of piety, and
fill them with the S^sirit of thy love." ^ All who are raised to the
dignity of the minor order receive " the Holy Ghost, that by the
words of the exorcism the unclean spirits may be driven out of the
possessed." * The clergy send the Holy Ghost into the hearts of
men, because they partake in the eternal Priesthood of Jesus
Christ from whom in eternity comes forth the same Holy Ghost.
They send that Spirit of God into the hearts and souls of men to
sanctify them and make them like unto the Son of God, our
brother, from whom he the Holy Spirit ever proceeds. In the
confirmation of the people the bishop, who is the perfect priest,
and who in a more perfect manner represents the Lord Jesus, he
sends the Holy Ghost into the newly confirmed saying: " May
the Holy Spirit come upon you and the strength of the Most High
guard you from sin."' Extending his hands over them he says:
"send forth from heaven upon them the septiformal Paraclete
Spirit."' Seven times at every Mass the priest sends the Holy
Ghost into the hearts of the people when he says the "Dominus
vobiscum" "the Lord be with you," that is the Holy Ghost.
Every time a priest baptizes a person, he drives out the demons
and sends into that soul the Holy Ghost to sanctify it with his
presence.
Thus let us better understand the wonders of the hierarchies of
the Trinity and of the church. From God the Father, and from
his only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, comes forth the Holy Spirit
now as it was from the beginning and always will be. That is
taking place now and always will be, for it is the procession of the
1 John. XX, 22, 23. - Pontif. Rom. De Consecr. Epis. ' Pontif. Rom. De Ordinal. Presbyt.
^ Pontif. Roman De Ordinal. Diac. * Ponlif. Roman De Ordinal. Subdiaiiac.
' Pontif. Roman De Ordinal. Exorcist. ' Pontif. Rom. de Conflrmatione. * De Confirm. lb.
54 THE COMING OF THE HOLY GHOST.
Persons of the Trinity. The Son is ever being born of the Fath-
er. From him the head of the church, the church is 'ever coming
forth now and forever, as it did from his side on Calvary. From
both Father and Son comes even now as from eternity the Holy
Ghost. There is the internal the hidden life of God, which no
created mind can understand. These processions of the Persons
of the Trinity are taking place now in the church, inasmuch aa
the nature of weak created things can bear the image of the Trin-
ity. As Christ comes forth from his Father, so the church univer-
sal comes forth from him, the diocese from the universal church,
and the parish from the diocese. As the Father sends the Son,
his Image into the world, so the Pope the Father of all christians
sends the bishop, the image of the Pope himself, into the diocese
he created as an image of the universal church, which he rules in
the name of Christ, whose Vicar he is. In the same way the
bishop sends the pastor, the image of himself, into the parish the
image of the diocese. The Father in heaven is the Father of the
other Persons of the Trinity, so they call us priests fathers. For
we send the Son and Holy Spirit in the souls of men to sanctify
them by his holy presence, as the Eternal Father sent his Son and
Spirit into the world. In the administration of the sacraments, in
the Masses we offer up to God, by the " Dominus vobiscum,^' in the
ministry of the Word of God, in every office and priestly function,
there we stand ministers of God, we are ever sending into the
world the Holy Ghost, the spirit of the Son and of the Father, to
purify the hearts of men from sins.
In the days of the apostles, when in fear and trembling they
gathered in the upper chamber belonging to the mother of St.
Mark, on that Pentecost Sunday, the Promise of the Father, the
Holy Ghost came down on them in the form of tongues of fire and
sat on every one of them.^' '
That was his first coming into the universal church assembled
there. From the universal church, he, the Holy Ghost, comes into
the particular church the diocese. From the diocese he descends
to the parish, and from the pastor into the hearts and the souls of
the people to heal them from sin and to fill them with the glories
of his holiness. The clergy are born of God by priestly ordina-
tion. By that we partake in the eteraal priesthood of Christ. As
the Holy Ghost proceeds from Christ, so we receive his priestly
powers by ordination. In our turn we send him into the souls of
the people by our ministry. Thus we stop aghast, astonished at
the wonders of the church of God, wherein are reproduced on a
small scale the life itself of the Trinity, the processions of the Per-
sons of God.
Such therefore are some of the wonders and beauties of our
hierarchies. We are united together in the church by the very
bonds which unite the Persons of the Trinity. All members
within the church live in the most holy bonds of peace, bound to-
> Acts. u.
THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH. 55
gether with the bonds of the Trinity. In ancient times the word
" peace" meant the union of churches, and the union of the dif-
ferent members of the church with it and with each other. For
that reason from apostolic times the bishops when pontificating
said: '' Peace be with you." That meant, let you be always un-
ited with each other and with me, and through me with the uni-
versal church, and by that be ye all united to the Holy Trinity.
Then you will have the holiness of God and of his Holy Spirit.
For ^*In the unity of the Church the Trinity appears in the
unity of the Father, as the principle in which we unite the Son, as
the means by which we unite the Holy Ghost, as the Love which
unites us and all in one." ' The church is holy because it is an-
imated and vivified by the Holy Spirit of God, who lives in it and
animates it. The Holy Ghost is the soul of the church. The holy
church is as it were his body. As Christ united to man in the
Incarnation, so the Holy Ghost in a certain way took a body to
himself. That is the church. As the body and soul in man
make one individual man, not two beings, one the soul and the
other the body, so the church and the Holy Ghost may be said
make one Person. As the human soul gives life to the body
which it animates, so the Holy Ghost gives supernatural life or
holiness to the church his body. " The holy church is the body
of Christ living by one Spirit, all making one body, because of
one Spirit." **
The church lives chiefly in the bishops the episcopacy, the chief
members of the hierarchy, the successors of the apostles. Christ
taught the apostles, and through them he taught the clergy, while
the people but dimly the mysteries of faith. " To you it is given
to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but to them it is
not given.'' ^ The Apostles and the bishops received the fulness
of the eternal priesthood of Christ. By them chiefly Christ brings
forth his spiritual children of whom his church is formed.
They compose the different members of his mystic body on this
earth. The episcopacy is not divided. The episcopacy of Christ
is whole and complete in each bishop. " We especially, bishops,
who preside in the church, we must strongly hold and define its
unity, that we pro\e the episcopacy one and undivided. The epis-
copacy is one, of which each bishop holds the completeness."*
Each bishop therefore is a complete high jiriest, for in his consecra-
tion he received complete sacerdotal power from the exhaustless
fountains of the Priesthood of Jesus Christ. But there is but one
Priesthood, that of the Son of God, the great High Priest of
eternity. Therefore the priest, the bishop, all who partake in the
Priesthood of Christ, all are one with him. Being one with him,
they give to others the sanctifying Holy Ghost, who proceeds from
him the Son of God. Therefore Christ through the Holy Ghost
is the source and the fountain head of the holiness of the church
of God. From the clergy the ministers of Christ, who are " other
' Bosuet Let. iv. a une Dam. de Metz, n. 7. ' Hug. de St. Victor de Sacr, L. II p. il. c. 1. 2
^ Matt. xill. 3. * St. Cyprian, de Unit. Eccles. n. 5,
66 THE HOLY GHOST SANCTIFIES.
Christs " like unto himself from them comes forth the Holy Ghost,
who, sent by them tlie clergy comes into the hearts and the souls of
the people to sanctify and make them holy, pure, good, filling
them with grace drawn from the exhaustless fountains of the
Crucified.'
Hence as Christ is espoused to the whole church, the Pope is his
highest representative on this earth, while the bishop in his turn
is espoused to a part of the church of Christ, to the diocese,
over which the Holy Ghost has placed him " to rule the souls com-
mitted to his care."" Whence St. Paul says **I have espoused
you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to
Christ." ' The wonders of the universal church penetrate into
every part of the diocese and to the parish. The Holy Ghost the
Sanctifier is the Soul of the church. He is there and everywhere,
in the whole church, in the diocese, in the parish, in the souls of
men sanctifying. In him the whole church, the diocese, the parish,
and each individual christian live move and exist, and have their
supernatural life and being. What honor therefore should the
people give their clergy! From them conies the Holy Ghost into
their souls, to there take up his residence in man, the greatest tem-
ple built by the mighty hand of God. Above all should they re-
spect their bishop! For from him comes the chief mystery of
our religion. "Through the bishop comes all orders, all myster-
ies, every Sacrament." *
From the moment the Pontiff erects a new diocese, the epis-
copal city becomes a centre of spiritual forces, and varied en-
ergies of clergy spring up on every side. The universal church
living m the very bosom of the Holy Trinity, opens her fruitful
womb, and brings forth a daughter to God, a diocese, the image
of herself. The moment a new parish is erected by the voice of
the bishop, spiritual life, which before perhaps languished, spring
forth in all its strength, and priests and people rise to new and
more energetic endeavors for their salvation. The moment one
receives a sacrament, he feels an interior strength, a drawing
nearer to God, and a more lively sentiment of the things of heaven.
What is all this? where does this come from? It is the work of the
Holy Ghost given them by the ministry of the priesthood of
Jesus Christ, poured out upon a dying world. It is the Holy Ghost
healing suffering souls from the wounds of sin.
The Holy Ghost is therefore *' the author and finisher of our
faith." ' He lives in us completing our sanctification. He is the
source of all holiness, for to him we owe our spiritual life. He
and Christ from whom he proceeds, live in us. ** And I live,
now not 1, but Christ liveth in me."* Christ lives in the Father
who sent him; " As the living Father hath sent me and I live by
the Father." ' So by him and by his Spirit, we spiritually live here
on this earth the life of the Holy Trinity, a divine life, which will
be completed only when we see them face to face in splendors of
« I. Tim. 1. 17. » Acts XX. 28. » II. Cor. xl. 2. * Simeon Thess. de Sac Ord. C. I.
» Heb. xll. a. • Gal. 11. 20. » Johaxl. M.
THE UNIVERSAL CHURCH, THE DIOCESE A.ND PARISH. 57
heaven, Christ, head of the church, lives in the persons of the
clergy, whom he sent forth with all his powers and sanctifying
sacraments. " As the living Father hath sent me and I live by
the Father." ' So by the clergy, the people are unite to and enter
into the most intimate relations with the Trinity. In the clergy
the people see the images of the persons of the Trinity. " He that
receiveth you receiveth me and he that receiveth me receiveth him
that sent me." ^
Not only that, but in an other way we see in the wonders of the
church, the image of the Trinity. The Pope is the head of the
whole church, as well as the head of the particular diocese of
Eome. He is the Father of the people of God. For that he is
called Pope, — Papa, the Greek for father. As the Son is born of
the Father before all ages,' so the bishops and the dioceses are
born of him. The bishops are the spiritual sons of the Pope, as the
dioceses are the spiritual daughters of the universal church. They
are spiritually begotten by the Pope and by the universal church,
as the Son is generated by the Father. The parish and priest
proceed from the bishop and the diocese, as his son and daugh-
ter, as the Son and Spirit come forth from the Father in the
Trinity. From the priest and parish, the laity are born sons and
daughters of Christ, for all who receive him in the persons of his
clergy, to them he gave the power to be the sons of God." * " For
unless a man be born of water and of the Holy Ghost he cannot
enter the kingdom of God." * " And if sons, heirs also, heirs in-
deed of God, and Joint heirs with Christ." * In the coronation of
the Pope, in the consecration of the bishop, in the ordination of
the clergy, in every sacrament and service, we find the image of
the Son and Spirit, now and from eternity being generated and
proceeding from the Father, or from the Father and the Son.
Such are the wonders of the supernatural life of God ever acting
in his church.
Proceeding from the Father and the Son, the head of the
church, the Holy Spirit comes down into the world, comes
into the souls of men by the ministry of the eternal priesthood
of Christ, by the preaching of the Gospel, by the prayers of the
good, and there he works the wonders of salvation and of civil-
ization amongst men, raising them up into himself, that with
Christ they may be one with God. As the pastor is the bridegroom
of his parish, as the bishop^s bride is his diocese, as the whole church
is the Spouse of Christ, he is the spouse of the universal
church. "As the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is
the head of the church, he is the savior of his body. Therefore
as the church is subject to Christ .... that he might sanctify it
cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of life. That he
might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot or
wrinkle, or, any such thing, but that it should be holy and without
blemish." ' Thus as the church universal is the spouse of the Son of
' John xl. 58. "' Math. x. 40. ^ Athanas. Creed. * John 1. 17. » John iil. 5.
« Rom. vili. 17. ' Ephes. v, 23, 24, 26, 27.
58 THE CHILDREN OF THE CHURCH.
God, as the wife has all the perfections and the very nature and
flesh and blood with her husband, so the church like Christ is
holy. Being the mother of his children, as the mother brings forth
children of the same nature with herself, as the church is the
mother of all the saints, who ever appeared upon this earth, so
she in her turn must be holy, or she could not be their mother,
the spouse of such a holy man Christ.
We can only for a moment draw the mind of the reader to the
spectacle of the countless saints and martyrs and virgins and holy
men and women who belonged to the church. They became saints
because they belonged to her. It was her sanctity which filled
them. History tells us of the sufferings of the martyrs, of the
constancy they showed in their torments, of what they endured
before they overcame the world, and flesh and blood to gain the
immortal crown of martyrdom. No work of history, no page of
romance, no imagination of the greatest novelist, can fancy
greater heroism than that of the saints and martyrs of the church.
'* He that overcometh himself is greater than he that overcometh
a city. " But the saints and martyrs not only overcame them-
selves, that is mastered their passions, but they also overcame the
world, the devil and the flesh by their heroic virtues and their
constancy. Following in the footsteps of the greatest martyr
of them all, Jesus Christ, they made up by their lives, what was
wanting in his passion. " For the servant is not greater than
the master. "^ If he the head of the church suffered so, why not
they who come after him? As they walk in his footsteps, so they
must all enter the dark shadows of Calvary. All this he foretold.
"If any man will follow me let him deny himself and take up his
cross and follow me. " ' It is a surprising thing yet it is true,
that there was never a minister of Christ who did great good in
the world, but who was misunderstood, belied, slandered, perse-
cuted, and that in proportion to the amount of good he did to his
fellow men.
The church being one with Christ, she partakes in his spiritual
dignity and in his authority over men. " He that heareth you
heareth me, and he that heareth me heareth him that sent me."*
Therefore the church is Christ and Christ is the church. To her
is given to bring forth his and her children, sons of God, that they
may in all things be like to her head and founder Jesus Christ.
Not that they can be the sons of God by nature, for that alone
belongs to the divine Word, his only begotten Son. But by grace
the sons of man become like unto and conformable to the Son of
God her spouse, for whom she brought them forth the day of
their baptism, when they were born ''again of water and of the
Holy Ghost, " that they might enter into the church, the kingdom
of God, his Father. From the church alone we all received from
God the blessing of salvation and the "power to be made the sons
> John, xill 16. * Mark, rtll, S4. * Mark (x. 36.
THE CHURCH TEACHING, SANCTIFYING AND KULING. 59
of God, to them that believe in his name." ' For the church is
"the fulness of the only begotten Son of God." *
The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, with the church are therefore
one. Through Christ the second Person of the Holy Trinity, she
is united to and made one with the Trinity. In the Trinity the
church lives, moves, and has her being. By the grace of redemp-
tion and the merits of Christ poured out so abundantly on the
members of the church, they begin on earth that life, which ends
only in eternity, in the splendors of the beatific vision of God,
where they live on and Avith his eternal life. "The tunic of
Christ that is the church gets its unity coming from above, that
is coming down from heaven and from the Father." ^
Christ did not choose to remain ever on this earth. It was de-
creed in the councils of the Eternal that he was to be born man,
to die, to rise from the dead, and to enter into the glories of his
Father, which he had with him before the world was. He then
went back to heaven to prepare a place for us, and he will come
again at our death to take us to himself. " I will come again and
will take you to myself, that where I am, you also may be." *
» John i. 12. 2 Eph. 1. 23. ' Cyprian de Unit. Eccl. n. 7. * John xlv. 3.
^Aapi(
;3? ■(<
for the V
QrcL.'ikO^^
The Eternal Priest-
hood of Christ.
fESUS Christ at the mcar-^
nation was consecrated by
His Father the eternal
Priest of the human race:"
Sending him the Father said:
From the womb before the day
star I begot thee. Thou art
a priest forever according to
the order of Melchisedech.*" He
was not made a priest of the
old law according to the order of
Aaron, for the bloody sacrifices of
the law of Moses were not to last
forever. They only prepared for
the sacrifice of Calvary which they
typified; they ceased at the cruci-
fixion, when the veil of the tem-
ple was rent, and torn aside hy
angel hands at the death of
Christ. ' He was made a priest
according to the order of Melchis-
edech king of Jerusalem * who of-
fered bread and wine to God * because his sacrifice in the Mass is to
go on forever, for the atonement on the cross is ever before the eyes
of God, his humanity which was crucified and his blood which was
shed for us men and for our salvation, lasts unto eternity and he
will ever offer his passion before the throne of his eternal Father,
asking for forgiveness of sin.
Melchisedecli king of Salem, as Jerusalem was then called, offer-
ing bread and wine to God was but a figure of our Lord ' who at
Luke xzili. 45. * DuU«pon concord Scrip. * Gen. xIt. 18.
":'''^.
Pmlm clxlll. 4.
Heb. V. 6, 10 ; vl. 30.
60
THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE NEW LAW. 61
the last supper took bread and wine and changed them into his
body and his blood. There he instituted the new priesthood of
the New Testament. There he ordained his apostles priests by the
words: " Do this for a commemoration of me.'' * Such was the
origin of the Mass, wherein we see the mystic or the typical repre-
sentation of his coming and his death, which is to be offered on
every altar as a memorial of him, till he comes again, as St. Paul
says: "For as often as you shall eat this bread and drink this
chalice, you shall show the death of the Lord until he comes." *
Each good person, every incident and historic event of the Old
Testament pointed to the commg of the Messiah, the Redeemer,
or to the founding of the church. All prophecy prepared the.
world for his advent. The vast ceremonial of the Jewish taber-
nacle and temple pointed to his life and death. When he came
and died he accomplished all they foretold. At his sacrifice on the
cross, the sacrifices of the Jewish law ended, God the Father re-
ceived in their place the atonement of his Son, which they pre-
figured and from that moment God rejected the rites of the Old
Testament and cursed the Jews who like Cain had put their
brother Jesus to death. To this day they are wanderers on the
earth, like Cain without a country or a nation, while the abomina-
tion of desolation predicted by the prophets still stands in the holy
places, and will remain there until the end. ^ >
God having rejected the nation the ceremonial and the Jewish
priesthood, Christ, called the gentiles and instituted another priest-
hood to take their place to teach the world his Gospel and
his truths. The old priesthood of Moses and of Aaron was to last
but till the coming of him the desired of all nations. But his
new priesthood was institued so as to partake in his eternal priest-
hood and it must last unto the end of ages, even unto eternity. As
Christ came down from the eternal Father who generates him
bearing that everlasting Priesthood, so the new priesthood of the
New Testament comes from Christ, who receives from his Father God
all power and might and authority over men. To the priesthood of
the church then he gave his triple power of teaching, sanctifying
and of ruling the people of God. " All power is given me in
heaven and on earth.* Going forth therefore teach ye all nations"
behold the teaching power. ''^Baptising them in the name of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. " * Here we see
the sanctifying power of the priesthood. "Teaching them to
observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you, and behold
I am with you all days even unto the consummation of tlie world. "*
And here we find the governing power of Christ. "
Christ raised his apostles and disciples up into his priesthood,
for he made them one in power with himself. " If you ask any-
thing in my name, that I will do. " ' Here he solemnly promises
that he will do anything the apostles ask him. He and his clergy
are one, and they have but one and the same eternal Priesthood.
» Luke xxii. 19, " I. Cor. xi. 26. * Daniel Ix. 27.
" Math, xxxili. 19. « Matb xxxUi. 20. ' Johaxlv. 14. < Math, xxviil, 18. 19.
62 SUBSTANCE AND ACT.
As he is one with his Father, so they are one with him. " In
that day you shall know that I am in my Father, and you in me and
I in you. " ' The Father, Christ, the apostles and*^ clergy of the
church are one. Such are the teachings of the church enlightened
by the Holy Ghost. ' ' But the Paraclete the Holy Ghost, whom
the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and
bring to your mind whatsoever I have said to 3'ou."' Let us
study the workings of the eternal Priesthood of Christ.
Each creature has not only its substance, but also certain
powers or faculties, by which it acts. But its faculties differ from
its substance. Thus man has not only a body and a soul but also
twelve different faculties or powers by which the soul acts. These
faculties or powers of creatures differ from their acting substance.
Because of his eternal simplicity the substance, the essence and
the acts of God are one. His acts and his nature are the same.
He has not faculties by which he acts, for he is the eternal simple
and most infinitely perfect Act. Being ever living and in act,
his internal act is to produce the Son and Holy Spirit from his
mind and will. But mind and will in him are not faculties as in
created man and angel, for his mind and will are his intellectual
nature thinking and willing, and giving rise to his only begotten
Son and Holy Spirit, each a perfect and eternal Person like unto
the Father. ''And these three are one, " ' God the Father, Son
and Holy Ghost. For the Father generates the Son without
division or separation of Godhead, while the Son and Father
produced from eternity and still continue bringing forth the Holy
Spirit their mutual Love.
The Son is equal to the Father in nature and in eternal and
measureless power. Sending his Son to be the Redeemer of the
world, the Father crowns him with the diadem of the eternal
Priesthood. Father and Son giving rise to their Holy Spirit, they
send him into the world to form and shape and animate the church
born of the Son in the rigors of his death. That Pareclete comes
in fiery tongues upon the infant church assembled in the upper
chamber belonging to St. Mark^s mother. He then appeared on
that Pentecost Sunday and since his coming he remains ever with the
church teaching, inspiring, directing and keeping her from error,
that she may teach, sanctify and rule God's people bought by the
blood of the Son.
Behold the mystery of the Priesthood of the Son of God coming
from the Father yet ever standing before the eternal throne " the
Angel of the New testament * always interceding for us." * On
the throne of God high, above all creatures there is Jesus Christ
the man-God with his eternal Priesthood ever in act ever coming
forth from his Father, always offering the fruits of our priesthood
our good works in union with his sacrifice of calvary for the sup-
ernatural life of the dead race of Adam. Substance and act being
one and the same in the Son of God his priesthood never ceases, for
he is " A priest forever according to tlie order of Melchisedech." *
« John xU. 2. ' John xlv. 20. » John x. 7 ♦ Canon Missae. • Heb. xll. 25. • Psalm clx. 4.
DIFFERENT RANKS OF CLERGYMEN". C3
Christ could not give his divine nature to his clergy, for that
would make them sons of God by nature as so many Gods. But
he gave them his supernatural power, that is his Priesthood, his
complete power over his mystic body the church. But the powers or
faculties and the acts of creatures are not the same, for they can-
not be infinitely perfect like unto God, who is the infinite Act,
because of his infinity simplicity God cannot be divided. In the
Priesthood given to men the power of holy orders is the substance
while jurisdiction is the reguhition of the acts, or the exercise of
these holy orders. By ordination or by holy orders we come forth
from Christ, Then we are born into his eternal Priesthood. As
Adam is the father of the race according to the fiesh, so Christ is
the father of christians according to the Spirit. By natural birth
we come forth from Adam while by -supernatural generation we
come forth from Christ. Each person baptised is born again of
"Water and of the Holy Ghost."' By comfirmation we are
strengthened by his Holy Spirit. But by holy orders we receive
in a higher way the Holy Ghost the Spirit of Christ, for by that
we enter into his eternal Priesthood.
By holy orders therefore the clergy partake in the power of the
Priesthood of Christ, while jurisdiction regulates the exercise of
that power. The clergy are in higher or lower orders inasmuch
as they partake in a higher or lower degree in the eternal Priest-
hood of Christ. At his consecration the bishop receives the ful-
ness of that Priesthood. For that reason he stands at the head
of the ranks of holy orders. Under him are the priests, who have
all his sacerdotal powers, except the power of ordaining other
clergymen. Deacons can preach, baptise, wait on the priests and
tend to the temporal wants of the church. The subdeacons wait
on the deacons and on the priest. The acolyte prepares the water
and wine for the Mass, the exorcist drives out the demons, the
readers read the Bible in the church while the porter stands at
the church door to keep unworthy persons from entering the house
of God.
In the various ranks of beings, the higher contains the perfec-
tions of the lower, and therefore clergymen in superior orders have
all the spiritual power of the lower ministers. Clergymen cannot
exercise the functions of orders they have not received, even
the attempt is forbidden under severe punishment. But when
clergymen exercise the duties of orders below their rank, they
add to the function all the dignity of their superior order, Thus
we read that our blessed Lord deigned to exercise the duties of
every order. As a porter he drove out the buyers and sellers from
the temple ;* as an exorcist he expelled demons from the possessed,"
as a reader he rose in the synagogue and read the prophet Isaias, *
as a deacon and a subdeacon he waited on his priests the apostles,
as priest he said the first Mass at the last supper, and offered
himself on the cross, as a bishop he consecrated his apostles bishops,
and sent the Holy Ghost into the church. Being God he added
> John HI. 57. " LLke x. 1. » Math. iv. xxlv. viil. 16. etc. * Luke iv. xvi. to 27.
64 THE FULNESS OP THE PRIESTHOOD.
to these religious rites a dignity belonging only to the eternal Son.
But he could not go into every congregation to every nation and
church to preach, sanctify and govern all men, for he was only
one man, who could not be present in a visible form among all
peoples and tribes of the world. He must then provide a way by
which his redemption was to be preached to the uttermost ends
of the earth, so that not only all nations but also every future
generation might benefit by his redemption. He appointed clergy-
men to do that for him. *' Going forth therefore teach ye all
nations." ' " Behold I am with you all days even to the consumma-
tion of the world."* He died that sin might be wiped out. He
gave power to his apostles to forgive sins in his name. " Receive
ye the Holy Ghost whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven
them, and whose sins you shall retain they are retained." ' As his
almighty Father crowned him the eternal Priest, so he ordained
other priests to continue his work. *^ As the Father hath sent me,
so I also send you."* " Do this for a commemoration of me." '
Each apostle received from him the fulness of his eternal Priest-
hood. They became universal bishops of his universal church.
The bishops then are all equal in holy orders — even the Pope, is
but a bishop, not higher in holy orders than other bishops. Each
bishop and apostle received the fulness of the priesthood of Christ.
The apostles and the bishops of the early church were no higher
than the bishops of our time. For the bishop at his consecration
receives the fulness of the priesthood of Christ, and more than the
fulness cannot be received. Christ is to-day with the church, and
with all his eternal power with the clergy, as he was during his
life on earth. " Behold I am with you all days even to the con-
summation of the world."*
At Baptism the child of Adam, dead in original sin becomes the
child of God, living his supernatural life. By holy orders he be-
comes a priest of God, a member of the association of Christ, a
partner of the firm of which Christ is the head, whose business is
the saving of souls. Holy orders once received impresses a char-
acter in the soul, which like the seal of Baptism and confirmation
remains for eternity. Once a priest, a priest he will remain for-
ever even unto the future life. The clergy then can ever validly
although not always lawful, exercise the functions of their order,
and no power can ever take it away, for by holy orders they become
the images of the eternal Priest, Jesus Christ, whose priesthood
ever remains in action before the throne of his eternal Father.
In Christ as God his essence, power, nature and acts are the
same. His eternal priesthood ever acts, for he continually offers
his sacrifice on Calvary before the eyes of his eternal Father. In
God there is no past or future, for he dwells in eternity, where
all is present. Time then is one of the qualities of matter. All
being present to God, the sacrifice of the cross, that supreme act
of the eternal priesthood of Christ, he ever offers before the throne
» Mflth. xxxlll. Ifl. « Math. xxxlM. 30. » John xx. 22. * John xx. 21.
e Luke xxxl. 19. * Matt, xxxlli. 30.
HOLY ORDEKS AND JUKISDICTION". 65
of the Eternal pleading for mercy for sin. In Christ then the
Priesthood, his death and the offerings of that priesthood aijp the
same, for he offered himself and his offering and his sacerdotal act
cannot be divided.
But this is not so in imperfect men. The power of holy orders,
and the exercise of these powers are not the same. The priest-
hood received in holy orders, and the exercise of these sacerdotal
powers are not the same, for in creatures who by nature are im-
perfect the essence and the act are not identical as in God. Man
can abuse his sacerdotal powers and become unworthy of his office.
While the character of holy orders ever remain imprinted in the
soul, the exercise of holy orders must be regulated by jurisdiction,
which is the authority of our superiors over us, in the exercise of
our holy orders and sacerdotal powers. In Christ orders and juris-
diction are the same, while in men they differ. For while orders
remain imprinted in the soul, jurisdiction belongs to our superiors
and it can be restricted or taken away.
In ancient times jurisdiction was called hierarchial union or
communion. By baptism the laity are received into the commun-
ion of the church. By ordination the clergy are received into the
communion of their order. By sin a person may lose these bene-
fits. A lay person by sin may lose his faith.
A clergyman may disgrace himself and be degraded from ex-
ercising the functions of the office or from the church. A man in
the lower orders may be degraded to the ranks of the laity. A
priest may be suspended, a bishop reduced to the ranks of the
priesthood. But all this relates to jurisdiction, not to the power
of orders, but only to the exercise of these powers. For the char-
acter of baptism, of confirmation and of holy orders remain forever
imprinted in the soul. Taking away the exercise or the acts
of these spiritual powers is called suspension for clergymen.
The priest in union with his bishop takes part in the govern-
ment of the diocese, while the bishop in union with the Pope takes
part in the government of the universal church. The eternal
priesthood belongs not only to the whole church but also to each
particular church, or to the diocese and to the parish, for each
diocese and parish has in the bishop and priest the powers of teach-
ing, of sanctifying and of ruling souls bought by the blood of the
immaculate "Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the
world. ^' '
Bishops, priests, and ministers first belong to the whole or to the
universal church. In this respect they are all equal according to the
ranks of the orders they received. Thus in the universal church the
bishops are all equal, in the diocese the priests are all equal, in the
parish the laity are all equal before the church.
Let us better understand it. The bishops priests and clergy first
belong to the universal church. They are all under the guidance
and the leadership of the head of the universal church, the Pope.
» John 1. 29.
66 THE ETERNAL PRIESTHOOD.
The priests and lower clergy next belong to the diocese, and they
are al> under their bishop. In power of orders, all in the same
ranks are equal, but not in the exercise of these powers. Thus no
bishop can exercise religious functions in any other diocese but his
own, without the permission of the bishop of that diocese or the
orders of the Pope, who has direct jurisdiction over every soul
redeemed by Christ, because he is the vicar of the Redeemer of all
men. No pastor can come into another parish to exercise paroch-
ial duties without the expressed or implied consent of the pas-
tor, or of the bishop who is the pastor of the whole diocese. No
assistant priest can assume to perform any priestly duty against
the consent of the pastor, because they are not his people, for the
pastor is their shepherd. Thus the powers of orders are most beau-
tifully regulated by jurisdiction, centering in the visible head of the
church the Pope, the vicar of Christ, who is the source and the head
of all orders and jurisdiction. Every act being regulated by the
canon law of the church there can be no tyranny nor oppression.
Hence no bishop can rule a diocese in opposition to the Roman
Pontiil, no priest can be pastor without the appointment of the bish-
op, no assistant can administer the sacraments without the given
or tacit consent of the pastor or of the bishop. Without the con-
sent of the superiors given in a regular way, the clergy are forbid-
den to fulfil priestly functions for the people. But such functions
are valid but forbidden and sinful. But the sacrament of penance
alone is null and void without jurisdiction, so as to prevent un-
known clergymen from wandering around from place to place and
doing harm. But the otherfunctions of holy ordersare valid without
the consent of the bishop even when the clergyman is suspended
from exercising the powers of his orders. Thus we see th^t Christ
is so careful of his mystic body his people, that he takes more care
of them than of the sacraments he instituted for their redemption.
But for serious reasons, the functions of holy orders may be sus-
pended for a time or forever. The clergy being images of the
eternal Priest Jesus Christ, whose divine nature and the acts are
the same, who is ever in act fulfilling his office as High Priest of
God, because of the intimate relation of the clergy to him, only
the exercise of the sacrament of penance can be completely taken
away, suspended and rendered null and void by our superiors.
For penance, being a judicial act, it must be exercised on subjects
given the priest by nis superiors, while the other functions of
orders are valid even when forbidden for cause, but sinful on the
part of the clergyman.
Each clergyman after ordination is usually assigned by his
bishop to a certain church, that he may there exercise the func-
tions of his orders within defined limits, and not encroach on the
limits of other parishes. In former times no bishop was consecra-
ted, or clergyman ordained, without first being assigned a church.
From that church he took his title that is his office or dignity. '
That differs from the title of ordination to the title of mission, if
A CLERGYMAIS^S TITLE. 67
in a missionary country, of poverty if he belongs to a mendicant
order, or of famularity if he belongs to the bishop's household.
The title of which we speak then is the appointment of a clergy-
man to a particular church, with communion and jurisdiction com-
ing from the universal church and the diocese, by which he par-
takes in all the honors and privileges attached to the position. Be-
cause of the high episcopal dignity, no bishop is now consecrated
without a title. By his title the bishop becomes the head of the
diocese, to which he was assigned by the Pope. In his turn the
bishop appoints the pastor at the head of the parish, and nominates
the priest, who acts as assistant to the pastor.
The title of the supreme Pastor is Jesus Christ. In Hebrew
Jesus means Saviour. " For he shall save his people from their
sins." ' Christ in Greek signifies the anointed. Messiah also is
the Hebrew for the anointed. His titles are numberless in the
Bible. The title of the Pope is the Bishop of Rome, the successor
of Peter, the head of all churches, for to Peter Christ said : " Feed
my lambs feed my sheep." ' Each clergyman in holy orders is the
equal of all others in the same order. The Bishop of Rome is not
in holy orders above or superior to other bishops. But because of
his title as Bishop of Rome, and heir of Peter, he has jurisdiction
over all the other bishops and churches of the world, for Rome is
the mother church, having authority over all christians, because
to Peter her first bishop, Christ left the power of ruling his lambs
and sheep.
The church title therefore completes and crowns the work of
the clergyman. By ordination he enters into communion and
equality with all the others in the same orders in the church uni-
versal. Then he receives jurisdiction in the diocese and becomes
later a pastor, the equal of the pastors with the same orders and
jurisdiction in the diocese. After ordination the bishop may ap-
point a new priest to a particular church as assistant to the pastor.
First the clergy receive orders, then jurisdiction then their title.
For Christ first founded the church universal. From her came
the diocese and from the diocese the parish was born. The hier-
archy of orders begins with the bishop and ends with the porter,
while the hierarchy of jurisdiction begins with the Pope and ends
with the bishops of various degrees. The bishop is the head of
holy orders, as the Pope is the head of jurisdiction. To the Pope
in the person of Peter his predecessor Christ said: ^^ Thou art
Peter and upon this rock I will build my church and the gates of
hell shall not prevail against it." * " Whatever thou shalt bind upon
earth it shall be bound in heaven and whatever thou shalt loose
upon earth it shall be loosed in heaven."^
Holy orders comes therefore before jurisdiction, as the univer-
sal church was before any particular diocese, while jurisdiction
precedes the title, for the diocese existed before the parish was
formed out of it. A bishop without title belongs to the universal
church, as a priest without a parish belongs to the diocese, while
■ Matt. I. 21. ^ John xxi. 15, 16, 17. ^ Matt. xi. 18. < Math. xxi. 19.
68 THE CLEEGYMAN ESPOUSED TO HIS CHFKCH.
a clergyman without a diocese belongs to the universal church.
His union with the universal church goes before and is the foun-
dation of his union with the diocese. His union with the church
universal and the diocese are the foundations on which rests the
bishop's or priest's title to his diocese or parish. Therefore no
bishop priest or clergyman can become the head of a diocese or
parisn, or be attached to any church unless first he belongs to the
church universal. Each clergyman must first be received into the
church, be ordained by her and remain obedient to her laws and
discipline. While obedient to her, no bishop can be deprived of
his diocese, no good priest can be driven from his diocese or par-
ish, nor can his church title be taken away without a just cause,
neither can a priest leave his diocese till he has first been received
Into another diocese.
The Church universal, in whose bosom dwell all Christians, is
the spouse, the wife of Christ. She was born of him and wedded
to him m his sleep of death, on the cross prefigured by the crea-
tion of Eve.' Bearing his eternal Priesthood, the bishop and the
pastor is the husband of his diocese and of his Church. From
Christ, her husband, the Church universal receives her power, her
honors and her glories. The honors of the husband belongs to his
wife, and the dignities of the wife belong to her spouse for they
form one moral being, one family, one flesh, blood, and one body.
As Christ and his church are one so the bishop and the diocese
are one. Christ left to Peter power to feed his lambs and sheep,
and he came and chose Eome as his church, his diocese. When
Peter died Eome became the heir of him to whom the Lord left all
power and jurisdiction in the church. When the clergy of Rome
elects the successor of Peter over the Roman diocesQ, God gives direct
to him all the power of Peter. Thus the new Bishop of Rome re-
ceives direct from God the power given the Prince of the apostles.
When Evodius was put to death, St. Ignatius his successor in the see
of Antioch became the Archbishop of the churches of Asia. At the
election of Simeon the successor of St. James, the new bishop of
Jerusalem became the overseer of the churches of the holy city.
When the Pope erects an archdiocese it receives a part of the
power of Peter over the other churches in the province and the
bishops of that see become archbishops.
Now we begin to understand the nature of the church titles.
The title of Jesus Christ is The Anointed Saviour of mankind,
because he was anointed in an invisible manner by the Holy
Ghost and the Father sent him into the world to save all men.
He appointed his apostles and their successors to the work of the
ministry of teaching, sanctifying and ruling souls. He consecrated
the apostles bishops, he ordained priests and ministers to do that
work for him, ana then he gave the supreme government of that
whole organism, his mystic body into the hands of Peter and his
successors, that all might be carried out regularly and without
confusion.
> Gen. xi. 32.
70 ALL BISHOPS AEE EQUAL.
Christ will never die or cease to be the head of the church. But
all clergymen will die, and their titles will then pass to their suc-
cessors in office. A clergymen's title then is the actuality by which
in a certain church and over the people worshipping there he ful-
fills the functions of powers received in holy orders. First comes
holy orders, by which that power comes direct from Christ, then
the clergy receive jurisdiction by which they legitimately exercise
these powers of the Priesthood of Christ over the laity given them
as their spiritual subjects. Their titles come from the churches
in which they exercise these spiritual functions. Their titles are
taken from the churches to which they are wedded. The clergy
in the universal church are all equal, according to the orders they
received. They may be higher or lower in the ranks of jurisdiction
according to the rank of the churches they rule. Not only are
they equal with regard to place but also regarding times. For the
bishops and priests are the same as in the days of the apostles.
For they have the very same power which the" Lord gave to the
apostles disciples and ministers. The bishops are the successors
of the apostles as St. Leo says: " With us the bishops take the
place of the apostles." ' " Wherever the bishop is either at Rome,
Constantinople, or Alexandria, he has the same priesthood.*'"
" They are all the successors of the apostles." ' for they all bear
the eternal Priesthood of Jesus Christ who is the same to-day and
forever. It follows therefore that one clergymen in the same or-
ders is the same administrator of the sacraments as another. For
they are all the ministers of Christ and Christ gives salvation by
them coming direct from the Lord through t\\e sacraments.
For we must remember that to Peter Christ gave all power in
spiritual things. " Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will
build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it." " I will give to thee the gates of the kingdom of heaven, and
whatever thou shalt bind on earth it shall be bound also in heaven
and whatever thou shalt loose upon earth it shall be loosed also in
heaven."* *' Feed my lambs Feed my sheep." With these
words he gave Peter complete jurisdiction over all the members of
his church. The Pope, the heir and the successor of Peter, is the
head of the hierarchy of jurisdiction, as the bishop is the head of
the hierarchy of orders. Under the bishop are priests, deacons and
the lower clergy, the creations of his priesthood. Under the Pope
are patriarchs, primates, archbishops as so many images of the
Papacy.
They are the delegates of Christ who gave them the power of
ruling souls under the authority and direction of the Pontiff. Only
through his spouse does man bring forth his child, another like
himself. By and through Eve did Adam bring forth his children.
Only through the church hisspiritual spouse Christ brings forth his
sons and daughters. For in baptism when mc are born of water
and of the Holy Spirit are we made " comformable to the like-
> Epiat. 84. * St. Jerome Epist. 146 ad Evang. n. I. * Ibidem. * MaUi. ul. 19.
THE VALUE OF OUR MINISTRY. 71
ness of the son of God/' ' But after the child is born it is nour-
ished by the mother. So after our spiritual birth in baptism,
we are nourished by the church. But not only on the substance
of mother church do we live, but on the flesh and blood and on
the graces of our Father Jesus, live we our supernatural life.
Therefore those outside the pale of the church receive no nourish-
ment from our Father Christ.
Now let us draw near and see more clearly these wonders of the
supernatural. Let us better understand how those exhaustless
streams of grace flow down from the head, the finisher of our faith,
Jesus, penetrating even to the poorest and humblest soul living in
and dwelling in the house of God, safe in the bosom of the church
the spouse of Christ and the mother of his children.
Man works not only with his hands but he also uses tools. It
is impossible to do with his bare hands what he can do with tools.
Men work not only themselves, but they can also work by others.
We say a man built such a house, a priest erected a church, where
he may never have laid a hand to the buildings. We say they built
them because they got other men to do the work for them and
under their direction. Business men appoint others to do busi-
ness for them, and they are the agents of those for whom they
work. Men in the legislature and in congress represent us and
make laws in our name because they are our representatives.
Each government has at the seat of other governments their minis-
ters, who represent the sovereign government, and their official
acts bind the government which sent them. Thus when we use
a thing without reason to do our work it is called a tool, when we
use another man to do business for us he is an agent, a man who
makes laws for us is a representative or a congressman, while one
who represent a supreme government atthe seat of another supreme
government is called a minister. By holy orders men receive from
Christ supreme spiritual power in holy things for the salvation
of the whole race. For that reason the clergy are the ministers of
Christ, his agents, his representatives, his tools for the saving of
mankind. By virtue of the supreme Priesthood of Christ, which
they received at their ordination, their official acts bind Christ.
In their official functions and acts it is not a man but Christ who
acts in and by them for he chose other men to act for him they
do that work for him. They are the reasonable living tools he uses
to do his work in saving souls. They are his agents, his ministers.
They are the clergy of the church, the ministers of God. They
did not choose him but he chose them. " You did not choose me
but I chose you.'' * He took them from the world and gave them
full spiritual power to go and tell the tidings of his redemption
unto all the children of earth. He sent them with all the power
and authority which he received from his Father. " As the
Father hath sent me, so I also send you. Going forth therefore
teach ye all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father,
' Rom. vlli. 29. ' John xv. 16.
72 THE MINISTRY OF CHRIST.
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." ' " In the name" that is
by the power of the holy Trinity. For the grace of salvation does
not come from the one who administers the sacraments, but all
grace comes from the Son of God, who dies that all might live.
It matters not whether he be a sinner or a saint who administers
the sacraments. He only says the words. He goes through the
ceremony, but Jesus Christ himself gives the grace and pours the
saving healing graces into that soul. Hence it matters not to the
christian what may be the personal sanctity of his priest or
bishop. The great High Priest and Bishop of our souls Jesus is
the Saviour himself, and no one can stand between us and salvation.
Here again we see the goodness of Christ, Avho lets not the salva-
tion or the damnation of his people depend on the good or bad
lives of the ministers of his church. The public ceremonies of
the ministers of his church, their administration of the sacra-
ments and their official acts are the acts of Christ himself. Their
private lives belong to themselves, for their good or bad actions
their sins belong to confession and they will have to give an ac-
count on the day of death and judgment just the same as the
laity.
Thus let us understand the eternal Priesthood of Christ. As
the Father sent his Son into the world to redeem mankind, so the
Son sent his apostles disciples and minister whom he brought forth
as the Father brought him forth saying: " Going forth therefore
teach ye all nations. "' " He that heareth you heareth me, and he
that despiseth you despiseth me, and he that despiseth me, de-
spiseth him that sent me. " *
As the Father and he are one, so his clergy and he are one. Be-
cause it was not meet that he would remain in this world of misery
and of suffering unto the end of time, for he suffered once enough
for the salvation of all men. It was in the designs of his Father
that he would return to him, and take his place at the right hand
of the glory of the Deity there to always make intercession for
us. * Thus he came died and founded his church and appointed his
bishops and priests to administer his sacraments "that wo might
have life and have it more abundantly. " '
The perfections of the head belong to the body. The head and
body are one for the whole man partakes in the learning, culture
power and eminence of the head Avherein the soul directs every
member of his body. From the head all vital force flows do\vn
into the body. The head of the church being Christ from him
the authority, learning, light, holiness of his eternal Priesthood flow
down into every member of the clergy. The clergymen rule be-
cause of the authority they receive from the head, Christ in holy
orders. Inasmuch as they partake in his authority, and learn-
ing, 80 they should be like unto him in holiness and sancity. For
the spirit of the church has always been to promote to her highest
offices only men of learning, sanctity, bearing the spiritual perfec-
> Matb. zzzUl. 19. * Matb. xxviii. 10. * Luke z. 16. * Heb. TlL SS. • Jobn z. 10.
THE HEAD OF ORDERS AND OF JURISDICTION. 73
tions of the Lord. This we see in the manner of addressing the
higher officials of the church. The Pope is called His Holiness,
or Most Blessed Father, for he reflects the boundless holiness of
God the Son, whose place he holds as visible head of his visible
church. A cardinal is addressed as Your Eminence, for he is a
member of the august and venerable Senate of the universal
church. We call an archbishop. Most Kev., because he should
be more holy than his suffragan bishops, who are entitled Rt. Rev.
bishops. Their holy office bearing the power of jurisdiction re-
quires more sancity than a simple priest with episcopal authority
as a vicar general a rector of a seminary or a dean before whose
name we prefix Very Rev., for they are over simple priests, dea-
cons and subdeacons, who are simply Rev., because they should
be more holy than the laity. Holiness thus is reverenced, for
sanctity is but the grace of Christ the Holy Ghost working in the
souls of men.
As the bishop is the head and source of holy orders in the diocese,
so the Pope is the head and fountain of jurisdiction in the whole
church. For to Peter the first Bishop of Rome, Christ gave the
care of his whole flock. As Christ could not preach the Gospel
in every land, he appointed his apostles and their successors to go
forth and preach that Gospel unto every intellectual creature on
the face of the earth. The Pope cannot preach rule and govern
in every church of the world. He appoints other bishops equals
of himself in holy orders, as Christ is equal in divinity to the
Father, who sent him to the world. The Bishop of Rome ap-
points other bishops with jurisdiction over bishops. Such was
the origin of the patriarchs, primates and archbishops, whose
honor are attached to their dioceses, and their successors will al-
ways be of the same rank as long as the see retains its jurisdiction
over the other bishops of the provinces. But Rome can erect,
disestablish, change or modify the power of the metroplitans as the
changed circumstances of the churches require. As long as the
diocese remains the seat of a patriarch, primate or archbishop,
so long will the bishops be patriarchs, primates or archbishops,
for the spiritual wife gives her honors to her husband, for husband
and wife are one moral person.
But the Pope can appoint another to represent him in such a
way, that the appointment belongs to the clergymen and not to
the place. Such is the origin of the legates, nuncios, ablegate and
representatives of the Holy see. They are personal and not local
like the metroplitans. The office being generally personal, it
ceases when revoked or dies at the death of the person, and descends
not to his successor. The Bishop of Rome will always be the Pope,
for the title is attached to the place or city. If the Pope would
resign the diocese of Rome, his successor would be the Pope in his
place. Because of the nearness of the Pope to Christ and by
reason of his peculiar relation to the whole church, as Vicar of the
Redeemer, he remains Pope till his relations be broken by his death.
74 APPOINTING DELEGATES.
or by resignation. Bishops of other sees besides Rome are bishops,
archbishops or patriarchs, according to the ranks of the episcopal
sees they govern. Their church is called the cathedral, for in
each bishop's church stands his episcopal chair, or cathedra in
Greek, from which throne as a judge he rules that part of the
flock of Christ placed under his care by the Roman Pontiff.
Whence the seat of the Bishop of Rome is called the Holy See,
as from that throne of the, fisherman Peter, he rules all the other
churches of the world, while the other bishops rule dioceses or
spiritual states under and subject to him, as our blessed Lord said
to the apostles, his first bishops. "I will give to you to sit on
twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel."'
Appointing delegates, the superior can extend or limit their
power, reserve certain cases to himself, or at any time recall their
appointment. When the Holy See appoints a delegate, the latter
receives his instructions, the limits of his authority are marked
out for him, and at any time his mission may be recalled. For
cause the Bishop of Rome may ask a bishop to resign, suspend
him revoke his jurisdiction or lower him to the exercise of only
priestly power. But never can the episcopal or priestly character
be taken away, for that is impressed by God, on the soul in holy
orders.
A bishop may not be able to exercise any of his episcopal or
priestly functions, even in his own diocese, as when a bishop con-
secrated to the title of a diocese which flourished in former times,
but is now overrun by infidels, and under the jurisdiction of a
missionary bishop, the titular bishop of that see when travelling in
that infidel county, so as not to have any conflict of authority, the
bishop bearing the title of that see he cannot exercise any epis-
copal functions in that diocese. Such bishops with the titles of
these old sees act as coadjutors of disabled bishops, as missionary
bishops, or as Vicar apostolics. They often belong to the Roman
courts, or they may live as retired bishops. For a clergyman may
become incapable of ruling a diocese or of administering a parish
and still retain his title. In that case a coadjutor bishop or assis-
tant pastor will be appointed to his aid, and he Avill be the admin-
istrator. As in the early ages no bishop or clergyman was conse-
crated without first being appointed to some church, following
that custom no bishop to-day is consecrated without the title of
some diocese.
In God every act takes place with regularity and according to
the eternal laws of his divine Being; and in the church, the image
of God, everything should work with harmony and regularity, and
according to the laws and canons which regulate the movements
of that vast organization. The Popes and councils enacted wise
laws and rules according to which each movement takes place.
Xo superior can be arbitrary, headstrong or oppressive on his sub-
jects. Nothing the church so abhors as tyranny. Jesus Christ,
> Luke xxil. 30.
THE OFFICE OF VICAR. 75
the head and source of both hol}^ orders and of Jurisdiction rules in
the person of his prime minister the Poj^e, his Vicar. The Pope
being one in government with Christ, the Papacy is not an order
between Clirist and the bishops; it follows that all the perfections,
of orders and of jurisdiction centre in Christ's Vicar, the Pastor
of the universal and visible church. In the particular church or
diocese, the head of orders and of jurisdiction is the bishop. As
the diocese is an image of the universal church, so the bishop, who
represents Christ, takes a priest, raises him up from the ranks of
the other priests, and makes him the vicar general, making him
-one in authority with himself, as the Pope is one in authority with
Christ over the church universal. In a still more imperfect way,
the pastor in the parish gives his authority to the assistant, his
vicar, who is one with him in authority. Thus the wonders of the
universal church reproduce themselves throughout the whole vast
organization.
Jurisdiction is the power of ruling and of governing the faith-
ful in the name of Christ flowing down from Christ's Vicar on all
spiritual rulers in the church. In a certain way, all the bishops
of the church aid the Pope in a general council in making laws
and ruling the whole church. In a diocesan synod, the priests of
the diocese aid the bishop in making rules and regulating discipline
for the whole diocese. In this country priests have jurisdiction
in all parts of the diocese, while in parts of Europe, the pastors
have not that power except in their own jjarishes. It follows then
that the priest can exercise faculties outside his own church and
parish with the consent of the bishop and in another diocese with
the permission of the authorities of the diocese. Without juris-
diction the sacrament of penance would be totally null and void,
while the other sacraments and functions would be valid, but sinful.
Jusus Christ, being God, the purest Act, his essence, power and
acts are one and the same; in him eternal Priesthood, jurisdiction
and divinity are one and undivided. But in creatures we find no
such perfections. For their power, faculties and acts are not the
same. They cannot ever be in action, but they must rest and sleep.
Holy orders, is the foundation of communion, of jurisdiction and
of priestly power, while the title completes orders. Therefore the
laity are incapable of any church authority, for they lack the
foundation or holy orders, although the Pope could delegate
a layman to transact church business. But a man elected to a
church can take possession in hope of receiving orders. A bishop
has jurisdiction in his diocese the moment of his appointment,
before his consecration, for the benefits of the Priesthood of Christ
was poured out on the holy ones of the Old Testament before he
came, for they were redeemed by the foreknowledge of his atone-
ment on the cross, for Christ is the same " to-day, yesterday and
forever. '^ " A bishop elect takes possession of his diocese before
his consecration, and his consecration completes his title to the
> Heb. xiii. 8.
76 THE COMMUNION OF THE CHURCH.
diocese. The same may be said regarding priests appointed to
parishes before their ordination. Such appointments frequently
took place in former times but rarely at present.
An act once done is a truth, a fact, and it is ever true that it was
done. " The gifts of God are without repentance," ^ the mission
of Christ is for eternity, * For that reason the Priesthood of Christ
is for eternity. " The Lord has sworn and he shall not repent. "*
He does not work in vain. He said to his Son " Thou art a priest
forever according to the order of Melchisedech."* When baptism
confirmation and holy orders has been once received, they remain
forever, for they imprint a sacred character on the soul, which can- ,
not be wiped out either in this life nor in eternity, for they make
the soul more like unto the Son of God. Therefore a priest once
is a priest forever. The power of orders still. remain. But the acts
or the exercise of these orders are regulated by the will of the su-
perior or by jurisdiction. A clergyman deprived of jurisdiction
because of sin is said to be suspended. He cannot exercise his or-
ders. But no one can be deprived of the communion of his orders.
For holy orders imj)resses a character everlasting on the soul. But
the clergyman for sufficient reason may be deprived of the exercise
of his orders, his care of souls may be taken from him if he be-
comes unworthy. But no one can resign his charge unless into the
hands of his superior, only his own bishop or Rome can punish him,
for other bishops have no authority over him.
In Jesus Christ, his eternal Priesthood takes its rise in the eter-
nal decree of his Father sending him to earth to be the Saviour of
men. Dying on the cross he espoused the universal church then
born of him. All priests, bishops and clergyman are born of him
by holy orders, and they are married to their churches when ap-
pointed to their pastorate. The Lord Jesus is the spouse of the
whole church, the Pope is the husband of the Roman diocese, the
bishop married his diocese the day of his consecration, while the
priest espoused his parish the day he took charge of his church.
Their union with their churches is but a type and a figure of that
ineffable marriage of Christ to the church universal. Christ is not
only the husband of the church universal, but he is also the spouse
of the soul of every christian washed from sin in his blood, because
he redeemed all men. The Bishop of Rome being the Vicar of
Christ, his chief agent, his vicar general for the whole world the
diocese of Christ, the Pope is one with Christ, as the vicar general
is one with the bishop in each diocese. It follows that the Pope
has complete jurisdiction and authority over every soul, both pas-
tors, bishops and people in every diocese. *
The Jewish priesthood, formed without an oath, * was only for
the Jewish nation. It was imperfect and it passed away. It was
established that it might prepare the way for the coming of Christ
and for the clergy of the church. The clergy of the Old Testa-
ment were of the tribe of Levi and of the family of Aaron. But
' Rom. xi, 17. » Heb. vl 29. » Psalm clx. « Ibid.
* Council Vatican Const. Pastor .fiternus- * Heb. vil, 20.
THE UNIVERSAL AND TAETICULAR CHUECH. 77
the clergy of tlie New Testament are of Christ born of him by holy
orders. Each priest, bishop and Pope are his spiritual sons, " made
to his image and likeness/' " conformable to the image of his
Son" ' we offer bread and wine ''according to the order of Mel-
chisedech." * But as Christ is married to the universal church and
can never be divorced from her, like him we are married to our
churches, and only death sliould separate us from our people; — the
pastor is seldom changed, the bishop hardly ever, the Pope ceases
to be Bishop of liome at his death or resignation, only Christ is the
eternal and everlasting Priest and husband of the universal church.
Jesus Christ, husband of the whole church and spouse of every
christian member, receives his divinity, power and Priesthood
from his eternal Father, the head of the three Persons in God.
Keceiving all he has from his Father, from Avhom he comes forth,
he sends his Priesthood down to us by the sacrament of holy
orders, while he gives us jurisdiction, or the exercise of holy orders
through Peter and his successor in the See of Kome. He works
these wonders of the supernatural in the church, that the internal
and unseen life of the Trinity may be eeen on eaVth, and that we
may at death by him be raised up to the mystery of the internal
the life of God. ''For in Christ life was manifested, and
life eternal which was with the Father, hath appeared to us,,
that you may have fellowship with us, and our fellowship,
may be with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ." ^ The-
clergy, raised up by the direct act of God in holy orders, partake^
in the eternal Priesthood of the divine Son, bearing all the super-
natural powers of Christ himself, born of him by orders, as he is born
of his Father in eternity. The clergy come down from the universal
to the particular church to fertilize the souls of men with the seed
of eternal life, flowing down from the Father of Lights through
his Son Jesus Christ. As the Son came into the world from his
Father, the clergy come into the church from him, and from the
universal church, his spouse. They came into their dioceses and
parishes, bearing with them all the power of the eternal Priesthood
of Christ, which he received from his Father. He came as the
Saviour of men, so the Pope, the bishop, the priest come into
their churches as the saviours of their people, bearing with them
life everlasting to dying souls. " I came that they may have life
and have it more abundantly."*
God works the supernatural only by his divine Son, who comes
from him, and by his Holy Spirit who proceeds from both Father
and Son. The Father alone gives rise to the Son. Father and
Son open their divine will and give rise to the Holy Spirit. Being
the last production of the act of the divine nature, his special
work is with God's creation. He moved over the waters. * He
inspired the prophets; he covered the mount of Sinai; he showed
his face in the ceremonies of the temple; he made the Virgin con-
ceive; he filled Christ with the glories of his indwelling, and he
1 Rom. Till. 29. ' Psalm cix. 4. * I. John 1. 2. 3. * John x. 10. » Gen. 1. 2.
78 THE SPIRITUAL RICHES OF THE CHURCH.
now animates the clergy, the last and most wonderful work of
God. He speaks to mankind by the mouths of the priesthood, as
before he spoke by the mouth of prophet. He ever works salva-
tion in the souls of men. He is in the priesthood of Christ, dwell-
ing with power in the clergy. The three Persons of God form
one undivided Godhead. What one does in nature all do, for
creation was the work of all three acting as one creative principle.'
The Father is the Head of the divinity, as the Pope is the head
of the church. From the Father comes the Son. From the Pope
and the universal church comes the diocese. The Son has all the
riches and the perfections of the Divinity. The diocese has the
riches and the perfections of the universal church, " a temple not
made with hands," " Conformable to the image of the divine
Son." '* The same essence which is in the Father is Fatherhood
in the Son it is his Sonship. " But christians cannot become sons
of God by nature, as that alone belongs to the divine Son. But
they are made like unto his perfections by his grace and merits.
That grace is not natural to us, nor does it belong to our human
nature, for it is a free gift of God. The calling of men then to
the priesthood is a supernatural act of God. " Let no one take
to himself the honor, but who was called as Aaron was." *
Christ as God is equal to the Father, but as man he is less than
the Father, as he says. " The Father is greater than I." There-
fore as the Son in his divinity is equal to the Father, he is not the
eame in Fatherhood, so the Pope by holy orders is not higher than
the other bishops, but he is higher in jurisdiction.
The Son ever coming forth from his eternal Father, all power he
has he gives to the clergy ever coming forth from him, as he
comes from the Father. Being thus generated by the Father, he
does not lower himself below the Father, so the bisliops do not
lower themselves in receiving their spiritual jurisdiction and author-
ity from the Papacy their head. The Holy Ghost receives all he
has from the Father and the Son, from whom he ever proceeds.
In this he does not degrade himself. He still retains all the per-
fections of the Divinity, and gives it to the church he animates with
his indwelling. So the diocese coming forth from the universal
church, the diocese has all the graces and the riches of the whole
church.
In the councils of the Divine Persons the Father presides. In the
councils of the whole church the Pope presides. In a plenary coun-
cil of all the bishops of a nation, the primate or bishop of the first see
by his office is the chairman of the meeting. But as to the Pope in
the person of Peter was given to " feed the lambs and sheep " of
Christ, and to *' guard the deposit of faith," the acts of every coun-
cil must be reviewed by the Pope, for they may have matters relating
to faith and morals, while the decrees of a diocesan synod only re-
late to matters of discipline and church government in the diocese.*
» Condi. Lat. Cap. Firmlter. • St. Tbomas Sum. Theol. I. Pars Quest. 42 Art. tL adS.
* Heb. T. 4. * St. Itrnatlus Epist. ad Epbis. n, ilL
^
jESUS Christ the eternal Son of
God, coming into this world re-
ceived from his Father his com-
mission to become the Prophet,
Priest and King of the human race.
As a prophet he was the greatest of the
prophets; as a priest he was the great
High Priest of the New Testament; as
a king he is the spiritual King of all
the earth.
As a prophet he taught true religion
to the world. As a Priest he offered
up his body and soul, his life and suf-
ferings to the Almighty Father, as a
sacrifice for the sins of men. As a
King he came the heir of the kingly
throne of David and of Solomon, he
was crucified " King of the Jews/^ He
is the teacher of mankind, the true light
which enlighteneth every man who
Cometh into the world. " ^
As Priest he sanctifies souls, making them like unto himself.
*' For them I sanctify myself that they also may be sanctified in
truth. " * As king he is the ''King of kings and the Lord of
Lords. " '
The church being one with him, to her his spiritual spouse, the
virgin mother of all his children, to her he gave his triple power of
teaching of sanctifying and of ruling all the spiritual sons and
daughters she brings forth to him.
Before going from earth he chose and ordained his followers,
his ministers. In them he formed the infant church. He sent
them forth as the Father had sent him into the world, with the
very same. spiritual power and authority which he had received
from the Father, from whom he ever proceeds, as they proceed
» John 1. 9.
» John xvll. 19.
Apoc. xrU. H
THE CHUECH TEACHING, SANCTIFYING AND RULING ACCORDING TO THE GOSPELS FIGURED
BY THE FOUR ANIMALS, TYPES OF THE EVANGELISTS.
LEGISLATIVE, JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE POWEES. 81
from liim, as lie did from the Father, saying, '' as the Father had
sent me so I also send you ' going forth therefore teach ye all
nations.'' Behold the teaching power. Continuing he said: "Bap-
tising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the
Holy Ghost. " " Behold the sanctifying power of the priesthood.
" Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have com-
manded you, and behold I am with you all days even unto the
consummation of the world. " ^ In that you see the kingly or the
ruling power given the church. From the Father from whom he
comes forth, he receives all the Divinity, and the Father has noth-
ing which he does not give to the Son. In the same way the church
proceeds from Christ and all spiritual power which he receives
from the Father, he gives it all to his church saying: " All pow-
er is given me in heaven and on earth going forth therefore teach
je all nations. "
From him the church comes forth, in him she lives moves and
has her being, and to her he gives all his teaching, sanctifying
and kingly powers. He is with her in all the ages and through all
the generations of men. " Behold I am with you all days even
unto the consummation of the world. " ^ Let us better under-
stand the nature of this triple power left by Christ to his church.
Each civil government in every nation has the three powers of
making, of interpreting and of excuting laws. They are the legisla-
tive, the judiciary and the executive branches of the government.
In this country the legislatures of the different states and congress
for the United States form the legislative branches. The courts,
both state and national make the judicial branch, while for the
United States the president or governors of the different states
form the executive branches. These three officers of these branch-
es were elected to these offices by the votes of the people, who have
received from God the power of governing themselves. But it is
not so in the church of God. For in the church all power comes
not from below — from the people up to the clergy, but from
above down, from Jesus Christ to the clergy, who by holy orders
partake in his Eternal Priesthood.
The church formed especially of the clergy, who are the teach-
ing church, they are the ministers of Christ ; in them is found the
power of the priesthood of Christ. Each clergyman is at the same
time a prophet a priest and a king, because he partakes in the
everlasting priesthood of Christ, which he received in holy orders,
and he renews in the church the divine life of the Holy Trinity.
The Divinity is the head of Christ and Christ is the head of the
church. Sitting now at the right hand of his eternal Father as
man and God, Christ reigns supreme as head of the glorious church
of angels and saints in the splendors of the skies. As head of the
church on earth, he appoints other men with his spiritual teaching
sanctifying and ruling authority to preside over churches in his
» John XX 21. ' Matth. xxvlli. 19. ' Mattb. xxviii. 20. •< Matth. xxvlll. 18. 1.
* Matth. xxvlll. 20.
82 THE PROPHETS, PRIESTS AND KINGS.
name. By holy orders they receive his priesthood. His Yicar
the Pope is the visible head of his visible universal church on
earth. The bishop is the head of the particular church, the dio-
cese. The pastor is the head of the imperfect church the parish.
Each Pope and bishop is a spiritual prophet priest and king, receiv-
ing from Christ power to teach sanctify and rule the people of
God in his name. Before going back to heaven Christ appoint-
ed them to teach sanctify and rule all the children of Adam, say-
ing: " Going forth therefore teach ye all nations, baptising them
in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost,
teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you. He that heareth you heareth me and he that heareth me
heareth him that sent me. " " And behold I am with you all
days even to the consummation of the world;" words falling from
divine lips filled with power and authority, not only for the apostles
but for their successors "even unto the consummation of the
world." '
A prophet is a teacher. Thus the prophets of the Old Testa-
ment came as images of the last and the greatest teacher, Jesus
Christ, the teacher of the whole race, " the light of every man
who Cometh into the world."". Being God the Son, the Image, the
Word of the Father, the product of the eternal mind of God, in
him is intellectual light "and light was the life of men." The
beauties of all creatures are but so many natural revelations of his
perfections, for every thing God made he made it to the image of
the divine Word, his only begotten Sou. The Son being eternal
Truth, it was just and right that he reveal the truths of God to-
mankind sitting in the shadows and the darkness of spiritual death.
The Church being his mystic body, he being her head, in him and
by him she teaches his truths to mankind. By his Spirit the
prophets spoke to the Jews of his coming, of his redemption they
foretold. Every incident and person, or historic fact in the Old
Testament pointed to his coming. Every Pope and bishop and
priest and clergyman of the Church, preach his doctrines and tell
of him crucified. To bind them together, he appointed Peter th&
head of the Church universal, and he nominated the other apostles
to be the teachers of the churches. Each of these in a higher or
lower degree partakes in the teaching sanctifying and governing
powers of Christ.
The Church is the teacher of mankind, for to her was given the
sublime commission: *' Going forth therefore teach ye all nations. " *
Christ was the teacher of his disciples and his followers. The
three years of his public life were devoted to that work of teaching.
The Church devotes all her energies to that saving work, for sh&
finds that her greatest enemy in the ignorance of men. Each bish-
op and priest being a follower of Christ, having received his spirit,
bearing a part of his eternal Priesthood, each bishop and priest is a
teacher of his people. He ever enlightens their minds with heavenly
' Mattb. xirlli. 28. * 3<Am i. 9. * Matt. xzTtll. 19.
WHAT IS A COISrSTITUTIOl^. ' 83
truth, drawing them nearer to God by showing them the way of
salvation. Now Christ as the Son of God is the Truth of the Fath-
er. He is the Truth of the Father ever coming forth from the al-
mighty mind of the Eternal. Each truth or idea coming forth
from the human mind, is but a weak image of the Son of God pro-
ceeding from the Father now and in eternity. '' I am" he says,
" the way, the Truth and the life. " Now and ever during eter-
nity, he as the Truth, he is coming from the Father. From the
Father he received all truth and he preached that truth to men.
" Because the words which thou hast given me I have given to
them." * Being the eternal Truth of God in him all other truths
are found. During his earthly life, he taught his followers all
supernatural truth received from his Father which was necessary
for their salvation. Then he finished his work. " I have finished
the work which thou gavest me to do." * By his preaching he
founded his kingdom on the earth, his Church which he had built
up and which he had formed out of the broken remains of the fal-
len children of Adam, that Adam whom the demon had conquered.
Up to his coming the demon was then the prince of this world and
he always filled the minds of men with the hatred of the followers
of Christ. " I have given them thy word and the world hath hated
them, because they are not of the world." *
The laws given by Christ to the apostles are the constitution of
the Church. A constitution is the framework, the general prin-
ciples on which an organization is founded. The constitution of
the Church was laid down by its founder Christ. It is found in
the Bible and in the traditions of Christianity. These are the two
sources of the truths preached to the apostles and by them spread
to the whole Avorld. Truth, being a revelation of the divine Son,
truth is that Avhich is. Therefore every truth is immortal, eter-
nal, unchangable and indestructible, like unto the Son of God of
which it is the image. Truth first lived and dwelled in the bosom
of God from eternity. Truth was with God as his divine Son, as
the word of God, "and the Word was God." " In the second place
that same Word came down from heaven " and was made man
and dwelled among us, and we saw his glory, as it were of the only
begotten Son of God, full of grace and truth." '
Thus the constitution of the Church came forth from the Son
of God as he comes forth from his Father, as the truth of the
Father so the constitution of the Church comes forth from him
the Truth of the Father. Such were the truths he taught to his
apostles. Truth being immortal and unchangeable, the constitu-
tion of the Church must remain ever the same, unchangeable as it
was when it was first proclaimed to the world from the lips of
Christ. The constitution of the Church depends on the free will
of God and he could have made it liable to change.
Thus we begin to see that the Church cannot change. For no
> .lolin xiv. 6. « John xvU. 8. * John xvil. 4 * John xvl. 14. ^ John i. 1.
e John i. 14.
84 THE CHURCH CHANGES NOT.
one can change truth. Thus the truths of the multiplication ta-
ble, the truths of mathematics are as eternal, and as unchangeable
as the Son of God, of which they are so many natural revelations
through the reason of mankind. Whence it follows that tlie morals
of men have no bearing on the Church of God. For let us sup-
pose that all the men of all the ages from now back to the time of
Christ were all without a single exception corrupt and bad. That
would not corrupt the constitution of the Church, for it is com-
posed of the immortal truths revealed by Christ to man contained
in the Bible and in tradition, and these truths being unchangeable
and immortal, they cannot be corrupted. Thus the Holy Bible is
the same as it was in the days of the apostles. We see therefore
how foolishly those argne, who think that they can find an excuse
for not coming into the Church, because they think that the
Church has changed by the badness of men. In the same way if
all the citizens in the United States for a whole generation were
bad and corrupted in their public and private lives that would
not corrupt the constitution of the United States, because it con-
sists of a written instrument, a series of laws immortal and above
the lives of men.
We know that the collection of laws, which form the cousti-
tution of the church, which were revealed and left to us by our
Lord that to-day they are the very same as they were wlien the
apostles received them from Christ. They are the same unchanged
as he in his turn received them from his Father from whom he re-
ceives his divinity, *' The only begotten Son, who is in the bosom
of the Father he hath declared him."'
Christ is a King. He said to Pilate: " I am King for this I
was born, and for this I came into the world, that I should give
testimony to the truth. Every one who is of the truth heareth
my voice." * Having Jesus as our Teacher, having him the Truth
of the Father, he reveals to us all truth which we require for our
salvation, and we know that we are safe when we follow his voice.
But how are we to know that the voice of Christ calls to us amid
the ceaseless voices of all the churches around us? we are to look
for the church, which our Lord founded. There are certain marks
by which the true church of Christ may be known from all the
other organizations claiming to be his churches, and which are
but stumbling blocks to the Christians of every country and to
every age.
The Church of Christ is infallible in her head, that is it cannot
teach error to the children of men. All the perfections of the
creature centre in the head. For that reason all the holiness,
and the sanctity, and the teaching power of the church are in the
head Jesus Christ. He is our High Priest. Having therefore a
High Priest Jesus the Son of God, in him the teaching powers of
the church centres. But he lives not now in a visible form in the
midst of men, as he was before he returned to his Father. He has
'John 1.18. » John XTlIl. 8T.
'IT IS FINISHED." " FATHER INTO THY HANDS I COMMEND MY SPIRIT."— LUKE XXIII, 46.
86 THE CHURCH CANNOT ERK.
another his vicar, the Pope, who takes the place of the Saviour wha
has gone away to heaven. The Pope then takes his place as the
teacher of the world. To him the Lord said in the person of
Peter *'I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and
whatever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be bound also in
heaven and whatever thou shalt loose on earth it shall be loosed
also and in heaven." Here we see the most astounding powers ever
given to men, the power of opening and of closing the gates of
heaven to the races of men. Again he said to Peter ''Feed my
lambs feed my sheep." ' Our Lord at the last supper said to Peter
that the Demon had desired to grind him as wheat but that he
prayed for him that his faith fail not and that he being converted
that he might confirm his brethren. * Thus we see that the Lord
did not leave his church to the mercy of every wind of doctrines on
a shoreless sea of human frailty without a guide or a rudder. Peter
was the captain of the ship of Christ. Such is the infallibility of the
Pope, when speaking to the whole human race in matters of faith
and morals as the successor of Peter the first Pope.
Here appears in all its beauty the teaching power of the church
of God, a power which comes forth from God, as the Son from
his Father. " I do nothing of myself but as the Father hath
taught me these things I speak. " ' As Christ can teach only
what he received from his Father, his head, so the church teaches
only what she received from Christ her head, from whom she pro-
ceeds as he said, " Going forth therefore teach ye all nations.
Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you, and behold I am with you all days even to the consummation
of the world."* The church therefore because of the infallibility
of her head, she is kept from error by a direct act of the Holy
Spirit, who animates and vivifies the ^hole church. In the ere- •
ations of God all the perfections of every animal are in the head.
For that reason all the perfections of the visible church are at the
same time in the head of the visible church the Pope. *' Where
Peter is there is the church" says St. Ambrose. The Pope there-
fore as the visible head of the church, the vicar of Christ on this
earth, he takes the place of Christ the great Bishop of our souls,
who has entered into his rest in the bosom of his Father, where he is
now glorified with the " glory which he had before the world was." "
He did not desert us abandoned to every wind of doctrine during
his absence. Before going he appointed Peter as his Vicar Gen-
eral over all the world, his universal church, his vast diocese, that
by his infallible doctrines he might keep the other churches from
falling into error in the faith. Whence to understand the mystery
of the headship of Christ over the church and his way of teaching
through the Pope, we must refer to the following chapters of this
work.
Not only through the church ha teaches the world, but at the
> John xxi. 15, 16. 17. * Luke zzii. 88. * John rlli. 88. * Matt. xxTtU. 80.
* Jobn xvli. 5.
THE NATURE OF HOLINESS. 87
same time Christ sanctifies the soul of men through the church
his spouse. There we see the sanctifying powers of the church.
The church sanctifies the souls of men. But let us understand
the deep meaning of the word sanctifying. The word sanctifying
and saint come from a Latin word which signified blood. Thus
among the pagans, all things which were dedicated to the use of
religion were dipped and sprinkled with blood, and by that they
were dedicated to the services of the gods. Sanctity and religion
mean very nearly the same thing, and Cicero and Virgil seem to
confound them as having one meaning. ' In the old Law every
altar and the utensils dedicated to the use of the Lord in the tem-
ple were sprinkled with the blood of the victims sacrificed to the
Lord. So in the church all objects, every person dedicated to the
services of the Lord are sanctified, not with the blood of the vic-
tims of the Old Law, but by the blood of the Victim of the world,
the Lord Jesus. Thus we dedicate churches persons and things to
the services of religion by special ceremonies, by which in an in-
visible manner we sprinkle the blood of our Lord on them. By
him they partake in his infinite holiness.
Holiness is freedom from moral defects or sacredness. Sanctity
means devoted to the work of God, and the more one is devoted to
God's work the holier is he. The salvation of souls is the highest
and the holiest work one can do, for the more saved the greater
glory will they give to God. Christ came into this world and
died for men that he might save them. The clergy having re-
ceived from him in their ordination his zeal and his desire for
the salvation of souls for the greater glory of God, the more they
devote themselves to that work the holier they become. For the
holy Spirit ever lives in them, inspiring them to work more for
the glory of God in the work of the ministry. Whence the people
are inspired to work out their salvation by the works and words of
their pastors and their priests. That work of the ministry of the
clergy is the work of the sanctification of souls. But human
nature inspires them not to that work, but the Spirit of Jesus,
whose Priesthood they received at the time of their ordination.
Salvation then is not the work of men but of Christ. For he is-
the great High Priest of our fallen race, now sitting at the right
hand of his Father, ever offering up our works to God. The clergy
are called by ordination, to a higher state of holiness than the
laity. For they are dedicated to the work of the salvation of souls.
Soul and body they belong to the Lord. From the Lord they received
the sacrament of holy orders, by which they obtain a part of hi»
eternal priesthood, all coming from his blood, from his merits on
the cross. Christ ever lives in the persons of his clergy. They
did not choose him, but he chose them and makes them the best
and the most perfect of men.
The clergy of the church are the ministers of Christ, the dispen-
sers of his mysteries, the saviour of his people, the fathers of hi»
» Cicero De OfHc. Lib. I. Virpril ^neid. Lib. xil.
88 THE BLOOD OF CHRIST.
children, the shepherds of his flock. The Pope is the chief minis-
ter of Christ. Rather he is Christ himself. For as the agent and
the one for whom he acts form one moral person, so Christ and
his Vicar form one moral person the person of Christ himself.
Thus the bishop the chief minister of Christ in the diocese is one
with Christ. Each priest in his public ministry is Christ himself,
and he binds Christ by his official acts. By and in the ministry
of the clergy, the people become the children of God the heirs
of everlasting life, ' and partakers of the divine nature.
Among the Romans before the time of Christ who touched the
blood of the victims sacrificed to the false gods were supposed by
that to have been sanctified and cleansed from their sins. That
ceremony was commanded by the law. Thus ancient nations felt
by instinct that man had been called to a higher state which by sin
they had lost. True holiness consists in tending toward that state,
to that supernatural end . "^ The victim of the world is the Lord
Jesus, who died for man and bought holiness for the wliole race.
From him, the head of the church his body, in ceaseless unseen
streams flow down that blood of holiness on men. But it comes
through the channels of the sacraments, the external means he
founded for the sanctification of souls. To the church he left
these sacraments and holy rites, that by them the church might
redeem all the generations of the children of Adam, as they are
born into this world. As in the Old Testament, the altars, the
tabernacles, the vestments, the utensils and all things used in the
divine worship were sprinkled with the blood of the victims, so
the blood of Christ fills the Church, washing souls, purifying
hearts, healing passions, and purifying all her members. "The
whole world is red with the blood of the Lamb slain from the
foundations of the world."
Each Sunday and holiday the people gather at the church where
the clergy oiler the Mass to God. We see the tragedies of Shakes-
pere or the representation of historic facts acted by artists, who re-
present as taking place some great tragedy of the past. We are •
entertained and delighted by the vivid manner in which they make
believe in the play, that they are the real personages of the striking
scene. But nothing on any stage ever equalled the ]\[ass. There
the Old and the New Testaments, the prophets and patriarchs, the
kings and priests of the old law, the prophets and disciples of the
new law, the coming and the life of Christ, the last supper and the
crucifixion, the death and resurrection of our blessed Lord are all
brought before us in the Mass, and there he comes into the world
and dies again in mystic ceremonies for man. There the priest
typifies him, and in virtue of his eternal priesthood, he offers again to
the eternal father, the life and the death of Christ for the salvation
of mankind. Thus in the Mass, the greatest event, the most won-
derful tragedy of earth again takes place on our altars, and over
and over again Christ dies for us men and for our salvation.
' John 1. 12. * St. Thomas Sum. Tbeol. 1 1, Queat. Ixxx. A. rilL
■ WHILE THEY LOOKED ON, HE WAS RAISED UP AND A CLOUD RECEIVFD HIM OUT OF
THEIR SIGHT." -ACTS I, 9.
90 THE HOLY SPIRIT WOHKING IX THE SOUL.
In him, by him, and through him the services of the church are
offered to the eternal Father as a sweet oblation in his sight.
Standing at the right hand of the awful throne of God, as the An-
gel of or messenger between God and man, as the mediator between
a sinful world, and an outraged God, he receives our prayers and
offers them in union with his atonement to his Father for the sins
of his brethren. The High Priest of the heavens, the Aaron of
the tabernacle, the David according to the heart of God, the great-
est of the prophets, the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of
the world, the Bishop of our souls, the real Pope, the spiritual
ruler of mankind, he now stands the only Christ and Redeemer.
Popes, Bishops, priests, ministers, every churchman, all they who
labor in his vineyard are but feeble images of him. We are his
spiritual agents. "What we do for the salvation of souls he does
through us. They are his people, for he created and redeemed them,
and to them we give his sacraments. " So let a man so account
of us, as the ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries
of God.'' '
The sacred blood of Christ, streaming down on suffering souls,
heals all spiritual diseases of mankind. No state or condition of
life but feels the influence of that grace and redemption. The
father generates the child and the mother feeds it on her own sub-
stance. Christ is our father and the church our mother. They
generate us, feed and nourish us after our spiritual birth, doing that
in a more wonderful manner than our natural parents. First we
are born of the race of Adam, but dead to grace and to
heaven, the curse of his sin still pressing on us. When the child
is baptized, it is born of water and of the Holy Ghost. By that
ceremony it becomes the child of Christ and of the church. Then
the first supernatural life of God is implanted in the soul by the
faith, hope and Charity, with the other divine gifts, which the Holy
Ghost implants in that person. Then begins the first dawn of the
supernatural life of God, without which the person belongs not to
God, and has no part with him or in the benefits of redemption.
But the first workings of grace given by baptism is weak. Like
a new born child it is liable to die. Twenty or more years are re-
quired to obtain the full natural growth of man. By confirmation
full spiritual growth and strength are given. Such is the sacra-
ment which makes us strong and perfect Christians, soldiers of
Jesus Christ, and full members of his church.
When the child comes into the world it must live for a time on
its mother's milk. So in the Church from Christ her head, we
receive his body and his Blood the food of all christians, which they
receive in Holy Communion. No father feeds his children on his
own flesh and blood. No mother opens her side and pours her
blood into the mouth of her child, so that the little one may live.
Only our blessed Lord so loves his children as to feed them on his
flesh and blood, his bones and sinews.
« I. Cor. Iv. 1.
REDEEMING BY THE SACEAMENTS. 91
Children get sick, and unless tended they die. So the children
of the church, forgetting the benefits they receive fall into mor-
tal sin. Left to die in this state they would be damned. But Our
Lord has provided a way, by which these sins may be forgiven.
It is the sacrament of penance, by which the sins committed after
baptism are forgiven, a wonderful means of grace by which again
and again we wash our souls bright and clean from the stains of
sin.
Penance is the applying of the merits of Christ to our souls. He
took upon himself our sins and wiped them all out with the ruddy
gore of his blood.
But sin makes a wound in the soul. Sin dims the brightness
of the mind, even when wiped out it leaves a stain and a scar in
the spiritual substance of the souls. So there is another sacra-
ment which takes away the remains and the scars of sin. That is
Extreme Unction or the last putting on of oil. Christ instituted
this sacrament so that the soul at death may stand bright and
pure before its Maker.
By holy orders certain men, the chosen of the Lord, become in-
corporated into the eternal Priesthood of Christ. By it they be-
come his agents to carry out his work for the salvation of their
brethren. From him their Model, their Master, and their Head
they receive the powers of teaching, sanctifying and of ruling the
members of his mystic body the church '' which he purchased by his
blood." '
In christian marriage the image of the union of Christ with his
church husband and wife receive love and tender affection for each
other, with the grace to bring up well their children so that from
their union may spring peace, joy, pleasure, and mutual help, that
they may bring forth children to the race of Adam their father.
These holy rites pour healing graces into our souls. These are
the seven Gates of Heaven, the channels of salvation drawing their
healing powers from the fountains of the Crucified. While our
prayers and other good works give us grace, because of the good dis-
positions we have and the work we perform, these sacraments by
themselves do their work, if Ave put nothing in the way of the grace
of God. Thus the sleeping child or the unconscious man, if before
he had tliB intention to receive it may be baptized or ordained a
priest, for these sacraments draw their powers directly from the
wounds of the suffering Lord on the cross.
The church sanctifies as well as teaches. In that she differs
from other teachers. For she is more than a simple school or a
government. Her teachings and her government are for the sanc-
tification of souls, for their salvation through Christ. Schools were
founded to enlighten the mind, while governments are for the tem-
poral and worldly good and happiness of the people in this world.
The holy church, our mother, acts not altogether on the mind as a
teacher, or on the will alone as a ruler, but on the whole human
> Acts IX. 28.
92 HOLINESS KOT REQUIRED IX A MINISTER.
being as a saiictifier. She teaches, sanctifies and rules, to soften
the flinty hearts of men, to bring them back to God, to civilize
them in this world, that they may be prepared for the other world,
where they will reign with God their Head their Saviour and their
Lord.
The passion and death of Christ, the sanctity of the Virgin
Mother, the holiness of the saints, the sufferings of the martyrs,
the good works of all those who went before and sleep the sleep of
the just, all these form a vast and unfathomable ocean of merits
and of graces, the treasures of the church. These the church day
by clay pours out upon the world. Christ as the head has given
these benefits and merits into the hands of holy church for the heal-
ing of the nations.
As his agents, the clergy have the fulness of this sanctifying
power. The bishop being the chief minister, to him belongs
to preach the Gospel to dispense the ministry of the word and to
oversee the work of the salvation of souls. '' It belongs to the
bishop to judge, to interpret, to consecrate, to offer sacrifice, to
baptize and to confirm. "" ' The bishop, in whom dwells the
fulness of the eternal priesthood of Christ, by the ceremony of the
imposition of his hands on the young levite, he sends down on him
the Holy Spirit and propagates his priesthood.
As Christ chose his apostles and disciples from the laity, and
made them partakers with him in the work of saving souls, so the
bishop chooses certain men in the diocese, he ordains them to the
work of the ministry of Christ, he gives them power to preach
sanctify and to govern. For ** it belongs to the priest to offer
sacrifice, to bless to preach, to preside and to baptize." * But
from Jesus Christ himself direct, and not from the bishop, priest,
or minister comes the powers and the graces of the sacraments.
For the sacraments belong to Christ and not to the priest. Al-
though the priestly character ever rests in the priest even during
eternity, yet, because of the government of the church, he cannot
exercise that sacerdotal power without the authority of the bishop,
otherwise there would be no regularity in the church of God.
" The high priest, who is the bishop has the power of baptizing,
and after him the presbyter, but not without the authority of the
bishop," says one of the oldest of the fathers.'
No matter how good or how saintly may be the minister of the
sacraments, or how bad may be his life and, morals, that makes no
difference in the sacraments. Whether administered by saint or
sinner, they are all the sacraments of Jesus Christ, who alone the
supreme High Priest gives them through his agents his consecrated
mmisters. He, not men is the fountain head, the real source of all
the graces and the blessings of salvation for mankind, for he alone
redeemed men on the cross.
The Christiana are not therefore independent of the pastor, nor
is fhe priest exempt from the power of the bishop, nor can the
' Pontlf. Roman De con Episc ' PontlX. Roman De Ord. presbyterli.
» Turtul. de Bap. C. 17.
THE G0VERN3IENT OF THE C'HUKCH. 93
bishop be free from the authority of the Vicar of Christ, as the
latter depends on his Father from whom lie proceeds. Thus he
said: ''In the head of the book it is written of me that I do thy
will 0 God." '
As the Father is tlie head of Christ, the Pope is the head of the
Bishop, the bishop is the head of the diocese, the pastor is the head
of the parish. Pope, bishop and priest have certain priestly acts,
common to them all, as to say Mass, to administer each of the sacra-
ments except Holy Orders, which belongs to the bishops alone.
This is but an image of the workings of the Trinity. For the
Father is not subject to any one. For he is not generated like the
other Persons. The Son is subject to the Father, from whom he
comes forth, and the Holy Ghost is obedient to both Father and
Son, for he proceeds from both. In all things the August Persons
of the Trinity are obedient to the one from whom they proceed.
They ever and ceaselessly obey the changeless laws of their nature,
while they have in common the Divinitv, which belongs to the
Three.
But creatures cannot fully imitate the eternal and internal life
of God; nor can we look for a perfect model of the Trinity in the
church formed of imperfect members. Therefore, except penance
aad confirmation by a priest, the sacraments may be given by any
priest or bishop, even without jurisdiction, for they depend on holy
orders, which no power on earth can take away from the soul.
•The bishop may make certain regulations for the internal admin-
istration of the diocese, the pastor may do certain things for the
good of his parish. Thus matters of small importance are left to.
the home rule of superiors in the diocese and in the parish.
Now the reader begins to understand the wonders of the church^
By the preaching of the Gospel, the children of Adam are tanghfc-
the way of salvation. They are called to partake of the bene-
fits and the riches of redemption. When they come into her bosom,
they are then sanctified by the Sacraments. The wounds of the
Crucified pour his blood into their souls; then invisible graces sof-
ten them and prepare them for the glory of the skies. Then they are
governed as one flock of the sheep of Christ, they are ruled by
their pastors who speak in the power of God.
The Son of God born of the Father before all ages " True God
of True God, begotten not made, one in divine substance with the
Father by whom all things were made,"^ at the command of his
Father, he came down from the heights of heaven, and became man
for us sinners and for our salvation. As God the Son, he is always
subject to the Father, obedient to the eternal decrees of his mys-
terious generation now and always taking place. No discord, rebel-
lion or irregularity can ever disturb the harmonious relations of the
processions of the Persons of the Deity, As man he was subject to
his Mother and supposed father '' And he went down to Nazareth
with them . . . and he was subject to them." ^
^ Psalm xxxix. 8. ^ Nicene creed. ■" Luke ii. 51.
04 CHRIST SPIRITUAL RULER OF NATIONS.
As God he was subject to and obedient to his Father, Son of man
he became subject to his Mother, to give us all an example of obe-
dience. As the Son is obedient to the Father, so the church obeys
Clirist, so the people should obey the clergy, the parishioners then-
pastor, the priests their bishop, and the bishops the Pope. Subject
to the Father, the Father gave him all power, '* All power is given
me in heaven and on earth. " * He gives all power in heaven and
on earth to his church "As the Father hath sent me so I also send
you. " * His Father from whom he comes forth gave him all au-
thority over all the nations of the earth; " Ask of me and I will
give thee the Gentiles for thy inheritance and the uttermost parts
of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt rule them with a rod
of iron."' To the church his body, one with him he said:
" He that heareth you heareth me, he that despiseth you
despiseth me, and he that despiseth me despiseth him that sent me."*
At the moment of his death he purchased salvation for all the na-
tions of the earth, and at that moment they were given him to teach
them, sanctify them and rule them, and by that to save them from
death and hell.
He raises up his clergymen to a partnership with him in his
priesthood. To them he gave the power of preaching his
doctrines, of administering his sacraments, and of ruling his peo-
plein his name and by his authority. The church being the spouse
of Christ, she brings forth his children to him. As the wife and
husband have the same authority over the children, so the church *
has the authority of a mother over all the children she brings forth
to Christ, Like a mother she feeds them with his truths and
sacraments. For to Peter he said "Feed my lambs feed my sheep" *
As the Pope is the chief shepherd of the sheepfold of Christ, so to
Peter the first Pope the Lord said these words. By and with the
authority of Christ, the clergy are the regal rulers of the people
of God.
The Pope, heir and successor of Peter, is the visible head and
ruler of all peoples here below. He is the spiritual ruling mon-
arch of the "City of God," the " New Jerusalem" the "Kingdom
of Christ." Through her and in her, we are all united to Christ.
In her Christ still sits upon the spiritual throne of David, " and
of his kingdom there shall be no end, " * for the church is to last
till the end of time, to save all generations of men, as they are
born of the fallen race of Adam.
The church therefore is a perfect form of a spirituaT government,
a complete society, rising above and independent of all earthly
governments. She alojie is subject to Christ, who rules her
through his vicar the Pope, while dioceses and parishes are ruled
by the bishops and pastors under him. The church is ruled by
God and not by men. All power comes down from God and not
from below up, as in civil and in politicaf affairs and governments.
From this it follows that the influence of civil governments, or the
> Mark zxvUl. 10. *Jobnxx. 21. * Psalm. 1. 8. « Luke x. 16. * John. zxl. 15, 17.
• Luke i. 38.
HOW CHRIST GOVERNS THE CHURCH. 95
interferences of the laity in the spiritual affairs of the church is
wrong, and contrary to its constitution and contrary to common
sense. As well might we expect the body to rule the soul, the ma-
terial to rule the spiritual, as to allow the laity to rule in the spirit-
ual matters of the church. But church rules and regulations ex-
tend only to matters of faith and morals, to spiritual things, and
but indirectly to world interests. As the spiritual rules the material,
as the soul rules the body, so the church rules the spiritual order
through the world. It is not an earthly or a temperal government,
nor does it interfere with the civil government of the world. It
deals only with matters of faith and morals, for Christ said "My
Kingdom is not of this world." '
Christ rules his church through his Vicar, the Pope, who fol-
lows the constitution partly laid down for him in the Bible, in holy
scriptures and in the constitutions of his predecessors. He cannot
do as he wishes, for his authority is not his own, over things revealed
by God. He is the Vicar of Christ whom he represents. United
with him, all the pastors and bishops make but one- government.
The rules and regulations according to which the church shall be
administered are made either in general councils or by the Popes
themselves. But no living man can change either the laws given
by God nor the natural laws of human reason, for they are the
dictates of the reason of God, and like himself they are eternal
and unchangeable. The church then cannot change any revealed
truths, for truth is eternal and cannot change. That is one of the
greatest marks of the true church, that it cannot change, but
must ever remain the same as it was when Christ founded it.
The authority Christ left the church is legislative or the power
of making laws, judicial or the power interpreting her own laws,
and of interpreting the holy Scripture, and executive or the poAver
of enforcing laws. All power of Christ has he gave the universal
church and from the universal church, this mighty spiritual power
comes down to the bishop, who by that power of Christ rules his
<3iocese. Christ being the real head, not only of the universal
but also of the particular, and of the imperfect church the parish.
He governs all his members in the persons of the pastors who rule
peoples in his name. AVhence Christ being the real head and ruler
of each and every church, both universal and particular and imper-
fect churches, it follows that no other authority in this world can
in any way be likened to the church, neither can any earthly
power control or command her.'' Will the City of Babylon, con-
ceived in sin, control the City of Sion born of Christ ? Thus we
see that the clergy, representatives and bearers of the fulness of
the power and Priesthood of Christ, rule the church which he
purchased with his blood.
Multitudes of souls are lost because of rebellions against the ruling
authority of the church. Whole nations fall away by rebellion
against the church, the soul of the world. For as the body without
« John xvili. 36. * Concil. Vat. Const. Eccl. I. CI.
96 THE GLORIES OF THE CHURCH.
the soul is dead, so Christendom and society cannot live without the
church. Withouther civilizingand vivifying influence peoples and
nations soon die. ' Jesus Christ is not only the ruler and head of
the church but also the ruler of every creature made to his image and
likeness. ' His spouse, the church, one with him received from him
power over all the creatures of God. ' From him and through him
flowsdownuponthechurch, all civilization, all learning, aliadvance-
ment. The learning and spiritual authority of her ministers direct
all in human affairs to the greater glory of God. Every citizen she
commands to obey, foster and uphold government, law and order.
Woe to the people or the nation which will not serve her: "For the
kingdom and the nation that shall not serve thee shall perish '*'*
Born of God, a stranger on the earth, she blesses the inhabitants
of the world, who come in through her holy gates. The great and
powerful rulers of the earth have come and knelt at her altars, and
learned wisdom from the lips of her humblest priests, '' For the
lips of the priest shall guard wisdom, and they shall seek the law
at his mouth."
Through her from Christ descends the blessings of heaven. She
spoke by the prophet saying: " Behold I will lift up my hand to the
Gentiles, and I will set my standard to the people. And they shall
bring their sons in their arms, and carr}' their daughters upon their
shoulders, and kings shall be their nursing fathers, and queens
their nursers, they shall worship thee (the church) with their faces
to the earth, and they shall lick up the dust of thy feet. *
The church then one with Christ, is a spiritual government abova
and independent of the governments of this world. Civil govern-
ments are but so many aids and props to uphold her, and in her
turn she blesses them. Of her Isaias foretold: " In the last days
the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be prepared on the
top of mountains, and it shall be exalted on the top of hills and all
nations shall flow into it " * She is the guide of nations as well as^
of individuals, and nations and governments should serve her as
well as the individuals. By her we are all placed in battle array, ^
fighting against the darkness of hell, conquering ignorance in the
minds of men poisoned by error " For the weapons of our warfare
are not carnal but mighty to God. . . .and bring into captivity every
understanding unto the obedience of Christ." *
Every one can serve the church in some way: " For he that is
not for me is against me"* says Christ. The world, to-day is af-
flicted by the rebellion of nations and peoples against the church.
We see the sad example of ancient Egypt, of Syria, of Arabia, of
Asia Minor, of peoples of the north of Africa. Once they were
highly civilized and flourishing nations, till they fell away into re-
bellion and sciiism, which cut them off from the fountain of grace
and holiness, the church.
So with the individual or family in the parish when they rebel
* Syllabus Prop. 56, 28. 7!, 78, etc. « I. Cor. x?. 86. 88; Philip. II. », M. » I. Cor. xxlU.
* Lsaiu Ix. 18. * Isaias xxii. S, 8. * Isaias 11. 2.
* Cant. vl. 3. " II. Cor. x. 3, 4, 5. • Matt. xll. 30.
THE GLORIES OF THE CHURCH. 97
against their pastor sooner or later they go to ruin and lose the
faith. Sad examples are seen in every parish. The punishment
of such rebellion is loss of faith and eternal damnation, the most
terrible spiritual chastisement. " He that will not hear the church
let him be to thee as the heathen and the publican."' The
church cannot bend to the ideas of any men. She let all England
fall away before she could give a divorce to Henry VIII. because
it was beyond her power to give a divorce. Either her children
must remain obedient to her laws and discipline, or go out from
her to perdition.
Such then are the three primeval elements of the church, her
teaching, sanctifying and ruling powers. There are not in the
church an order of teachers, another of sanctifiers and a third
of rulers. For the priesthood of Christ is not divided — but one.
Lifted to a union with Ciirist, animated with the Holy Spirit,
all priests, each bishop, has these three powers undivided. " To
one indeed by the spirit is given the word of wisdom, to another the
word of knowledge to another faith in the same spirit, to an-
other the working of miracles, to another the interpretation of
speeches. For as the body is one and hath many members, and all
the members of the same body, whereas they are many, yet are
one body, so also is Christ. *
Vie must remember that the Father rules Christ because he gen-
erates him. Christ rules the church because she comes fi-oni him,
the Pope rules the bishops because they are appointed by him, the
bishop rules the pastors because he ordains and sends them, the
pastor rules the people because he brings them forth in baptism
and feeds them on the sacraments. As the mother rules her chil-
dren, wdiom she generates according to the law of Nature, so Christ
givesthis his power to the church, his wife, his spouse, because by and
in and through her, he brings forth his spiritual children. She is
their mother and they are the sons of God and the children of
Christ. First comes into play the i^reaching power of the Church.
For how can they believe unless they hear. First the nations must
be taught. Then they are sanctified by the holiness of Christ, by
the sacraments of the Church, The Church calls the nations, not
from the nothingness of dark night and chaos as God bid the world
come forth at Creation, but she seeks them in the darkness of error,
in infidelity and the blindness of the sin of Adam, — she calls them
into the Avonderful light of the Gospel of the Son of God.
When the fallen children of Adam hear her voice, she pours in-
to their souls the saving graces of salvation, coming from the foun-
tain of all graces Christ. Sanctified and through her made new
creatures, children of God, heirs of heaven, then she rules them
unto Christ making them •' conformable to the image of his glory."
At death she sends these redeemed souls to God the Son, her
Spouse. Thus ever harvesting the souls of men, she is carrying out
the great work of redemption begun by Christ.
1 Math, xvlli. ir. 2 I. Cor. xll. 8-10, 12.
CARDINAL NEWMAN.
(^^IMLY in the Old Testament
4]^)) but clear and distinct in
(;U^ the New, God revealed to
the human race that he is
one in nature and Three in Divine
Persons. The Father com i ng from
none, — the Son ever generated
from the eternal Mind of the Fath-
er,— the Holy Spirit ever proceed-
ing from the will of both Father
and Son. These three form the
mighty hierarchy of the blessed
Trinity, they are one and the same
Deity, the Eternal, the Incompre-
hensible who created the whole uni-
verse both material and spiritual.
Each created being is an image of
God subject to the laws which direct its movements. A law to them-
selves, the persons of the Trinity proceed one from the other, they
made the laws governing the movements of creatures representing
the eternal laws which the divine persons are unto themselves.
The Son organized the church, as the last creation of God, with
her hierarchies of laity, of priests of bishops, with the Pope at their
head as the Father is the head of the Trinity.
Having all perfections in themselves, the Son is the Reason of
God, and no perfection can be, but which is the Son, infinitely Per-
fect containing all perfections for any imperfection cannot be in
the God. When God made the world he made man to the image
of himself — to the likeness of the divine Son, for he could not make
it like to anything not in him, for he being infinitely perfect has
all perfections.
The mind conceives truth and every right idea in the mind
is a truth. The image or Idea in the mind of God is the
Son. But when Adam sinned, God revealed still farther the
100 ONE GOD, ONE CHCBCH.
wonders of his Word his Son. He then decreed the incarnation,
by which he restored man again to the supernatural state, which
Adam lost. The Son being the truth of God revealed to man,
that revelation of Truth in the Son is one. Being a revelation
of the Son, religion is one and undivided. The Father has his
only begotten Son. That Son has his only church, which he
alone founded. Only the religion established by God among the
Jews of old was the religion of God. The sacrifice of Moses,
the ceremonies of the temple, the priesthood of Aaron, these only
pleased the Lord of hosts in the days of yore, while all the false
religions of the pagan nations were abominable in the eyes of God.
Only in the church of Christ, in the church established by him are
prayers and sacrifices received in heaven. AVhere are the countless
millions of the pagan nations who lived before the time of Christ?
They were lost. Tiiey had not the true religion. So it is to-day.
There is but one only church of God, where in his Truth is preached,
wherein his sacraments wash souls, there his government exists,
there his people are redeemed. All other churches are unpleasing
before his eyes, he receives not their services for they drag people
from his church. " He that is not with me is against me."
Who can suppose that Adam had more than one spouse or wife?
Only by Eve, taken from his side, did he bring forth his children.
So our dear Lord has but one spouse, born of him in the tor-
ments of the cross shown visibly in the water and with the
blood flowing from his side. The man who marries more than one
woman, who has at the same time many wives, all living and co-
habiting with him, he and they commit a crime. Can any one
think that Christ has a lot of spouses and concubines, numerous
churches all married to him? Could he be a Mohammedan, a pagan,
a Mormon with all the churches united to him in that spiritual
wedlock by each bringing forth spiritual children? Can a people
found a church and marry her to Christ without his consent?
And where in the Bible do we read that he was married to all
these churches? •
Man and wife are one bone, flesh and nature. Yet all these
different churches in the world are not one and the same, for each
one is of a different nature, having each its own peculiar teaching,
doctrines and discipline. Each church being different, thev can-
not be all at the same time the churches of Christ. A man and
woman must both give their consent, or the marriage will be null
and void. For a union of a church with Christ, both the latter
and the church must give a mutual consent. Yet where do we
hear of such a union of Christ with churches founded 1,500 years
after he went^ack to heaven.
As the Scriptures says, as the prophets foretold, Christ is the
head of the church. Her members are bone of his bone and flesh
of his flesh. Tliat union with Christ, which begins in the church
on earth, becomes completed in heaven, where dwell the perfect
church formed by the saints and the good who have passed away.
CHUECH GOVERNMENT. 101
'Kow they reign with him in glory. Unless that union with Christ
begins on this earth before death, in the other life the soul will be
separated from God, and that is hell, — the loss of God in the spirit
world Avhere minds and wills cling unchangeably and fixedly to prin-
ciples true or false, for that is the nature of beings in the world of
spirits.
The church is the mystic body of Christ. He is her head.
What head has a lot of bodies all united to it, all receiving power and
life from that single head. God does not create in that monstrous
manner. Every head has but one body. The visible is but an
image of the spirit world. Christ is the spiritual head of the
church, and he has but one church, one body, the image of the
body he assumed, when he was born of Mary. The other churches
which were rose centuries after Christ and formed from the catholic
church, of which he is the head, these churches could not become
other bodies attached to him as their head. They may claim him
as their head, but they are like headless bodies, seeking to be at-
tached to the head of a great man, because they have no head of
their own.
The church is a kingdom. Such was she foretold to be by the pro-
phets. A kingdom has but one king, one government, one auth-
ority, one code of laws, one form of administration. AVhen a part
of the nation throws off the authority of the kingdom, the citi-
zens of that section belong no more to that kingdom. They are
no longer subjects of that king, for they have rejected his author-
ity. So it is with the churches. When a people reject the catho-
lic church, the kingdom of Christ, that kingdom he established
before he left the earth, they no longer belong to him, for while
on earth he founded his kingdom, the church he established in the
persons of his apostles, disciples and followers, akingdomjstill ruled
by his Vicar, his prime minister, Peter, and his successors in the
See of Rome.
The church is a society, a spiritual government, a constitutional
monarchy with Christ at the head. It is a visible government,
extending over all the earth, ruling the souls and the consciences
of men. Other governments rule the whole man in his tempor-
al civil welfare, taking into account the external actions of citi-
zens, but unable to penetrate into the hidden secrets of the heart.
But the church, being a spiritual society, she rules the souls of men.
She teaches them to hear her, she penetrates into the conscience
of her subjects in the confessional, she comes into direct contact
with the m'ind and will, and regulates the highest and noblest part
of man, his immortal soul. In this all civil laws are imperfect.
For they can see only the external act, while the church passes
judgment on the most secret sins and shortcomings of man revealed
in the secrets of confession. By her dogmatic teachings, she
tells men to believe the truths God revealed to the human race.
By this she enlightens mens' minds. By her moral principles she
tells people what to do, what is siu, the difference between good
102 PROTESTANT CHURCHES.
and bad actions. By this she regulates the will of all peoples and
nations. Bnt she has but one and tlie same doctrines for all
men. In tliis she is one and the same. Her priests and bishops
reflect the light which shines on them from the Roman Pontiff
to whom was given to confirm his brethren.
All other churches are more or less national. They bear more or
less the peculiar marks of race characteristics and prejudices. The
Episcopal church, formed of the catholic teachings, which for a
thousand years had penetrated all the ranks of that people, the
church of England partakes of the wealth culture and customs of
the English race. The Lutheran church, founded by the bad priest
Luther holds to the German character. The Presbyterian church
founded by John Knox in Scotland on the remains of the catholic
church driven out, still preaches the singular doctrines of Calvin.
The Methodist church depends mostly on physical excitement and
on the feelings, as taught by her founders John and Charles Wesley.
The Congregational churches founded first in England but intro-
duced into the country by the first colonists of New England, when
they organized *' a state without a king, and a church without a
bishop" is a purely American church, each church and congregation
being free and independant from all other congregations. The Bap-
tists hold to the necessity of immersing the whole person in the
waters, without which they say the baptismal rite is not valid. So
all modern churches are infected with peculiar doctrines to which
they hold, to which they give prominence, to the forgetfulness of
the other teachings of the Gospel. They were founded on a bad
interpretation of the Scriptures, which does not give the true mean-
ing of the word of God, which a writer says has 25,000 false
doctrines and more than 200,000 mistakes. ' A new version was
made in late years, but the work of the King James' Bible had
gone on for 300 years, still leading men from the true fold of
Christ.
The church is a sheepfold. Around Jerusalem and in the Holy
Land may still be seen the sheep pens, where the shepherds shut up
their flocks at night safe from the wild beasts. They guarded
them during the day while they fed. There our Lord found the
figure of the sheepfold. He is the shepherd, "I am the good shep-
herd I know my sheep and my sheep know me.'" The shepherd or
pastor guards his sheep from the wolves and the wild beasts of every
bad doctrine. The Lord still feeds his sheep by the shepherds or
pastors he has placed over them. There is but one visible shepherd
in the world, the Vicar of the Good Shepherd, and all others rule his
flocks and feed his sheep by delegated power, coming down from the
successor of Peter, to whom the Lord said '' Feed my lambs Feed
my Sheep." *
'These other churches are not the sheepfolds of Christ, "And
other sheep I have that are not of this fold, them also I must bring,
• Ward's ErraU of the Protestant Bible. ' John x. 11. * Jotao zz. 16.
THE TKOTESTANT SERVICES. 103
and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold and one
shepherd/"
Nothing so startles a thinking man as the failure of the other
churches to hold the people. Not one in ten among them go to
churcli each Sunday in the year to worship God. The larger
part of the population in Protestant countries are practically white-
washed pagans. Religion is something second to their business.
They are attracted by the show or the society of the congregations,
or they take the occasion of showing their wealth, but the majority
go not for the reason of '' worshipping God in spirit and in truth''. *
When they do go each church is a stage whereon the minister comes
to preach what he believes is the word of God, and what will please
them as they hire him for that; the choir sings nice hymns in
English, which pleases the hearers; the people see each other and
meet socially; the minister dismisses them with his benediction,
and they go home thinking they belong to the church of Christ
and that they have worshipped God. They practically worship the
good sermon and the music. If they do not come each Sunday,
the minister goes to their houses to ''drum them up." The men
women and children believe what they wish, and reject what they
do not like. Each is his own pope, and there are as many churches
as members, for no two believe alike. Thus outside the catholic
church there is no true religion, no sacrifice of the divine Son, no
worship received by God through Jesus Christ.
Each generation outside the church drifts farther from the doc-
trines given their forefathers. They are gradually losing the
sublime teachings given by the catholic church, which they admire,
when they find it in their churches. There is then but one church,
one faith, one baptism, one God the father of all, who rejects all
worship, but that coming up to the eternal throne from the church
and spouse of his Son through the Eedeemer, ''who always makes
intercession for us.'' ^
The church is the image of the Trinity. In heaven the Son is
in the Father, the Holy Ghost is in the Father and in the Son,
and the Father is in both. *'I am in the Father and the Father
is in me." "He that seeth me seeth the Father." * By the mystery
of the incircumsession, the Persons of the Trinity are one and un-
divided. So in the church. The diocese is in the universal
church, and the parish is in the diocese, and both diocese and
parish are in the church universal. The diocese is not to be
taken as a part of the church universal, but one with it; the
parish is not be considei'ed as a part of the diocese, but one with
it, and one with the church universal. All the churches of a na-
tion must not be taken as a part or branch of the church, but one
with it. They are all one of which the Holy Ghost is the Soul.
God cannot be divided. For division belongs not to spirits but to
material things. Christ has not many mystical bodies nor parts of
bodies, but one body the church. Thus it is impossible for the
> John X. 16. 2 John iv. 2^, ^ Heb. vll. 25. * John xlv.
104 THE VINE AND BRANCHES.
church to be divided, nor can dioceses, or parishes, or pastors, or
peoples divide from her and form other churches. If they divide
and separate from her. they cut themselves from the body of
Christ. Then being dead they receive no nourishment from
her head, Christ, and soon they begin to disintegrate and fall to
pieces for want of the one Spirit of God. They become like
,these parts of the human body cut off which dies. It is not a
church but the withered image of what was once a church, which
before the division was united to Christ through and by the uni-
versal church, his mystic body. "I am the true vine, and my Fa-
ther is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not
fruit, he will take away.'^ ' Where are the great churches of Asia^
of Egypt, of the cradle lands of the faith? They bore not fruit.
They separated from the central trunk, the Koman Pontiff, and
they died, and these once fair regions are now cursed with every
heresy.
" I am the vine you are the branches, as the branch cannot
bear fruit of itself, unless it abide in the vine, so neither can you
unless you abide in me."* Look at a grape vine, notice a spruce
or pine tree. Every branch shoots from the main trunk, an image
of the central stem, a perfect copy, each limb having other
branches shooting forth from it. So every diocese in the world
springs forth from the central trunk, Rome, bringing forth othei-
churclies and parishes, the images of itself. It is the im-
age of the Roman church, of which Christ is the head,
giving it spiritual jurisdiction, life, grace, supernatural sap and
heavenly nourishment, from whence it flows down into all the
other churches of the world. Let one of the churches or a dio-
cese, or a member either of the clergy or laity divide from Rome
and they witlier and die, for they receive, no sap or supernatural life,
for the channels of grace, the arteries, carry no more to it the life-
giving blood of redemption, flowing from the head, the Crucified.
" If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch
and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into
the fire."' The head nourishes the body with life and vital
force, flowing down into it through the great central nerve trunk
the spinal cord. Cut that spinal cord and the body dies in an in-
stant, for it is then separated from the head, Christ teaches and
nourishes the church with his teachings coming down through
the central trunk the Bishop of the diocese of Rome. The
church, the people, the nation dies when they separate from that
marrow of religion. They may for a time continue in the eyes of
men as a church, they will seem on the outside to the eyes of men
as a church, but they are a body spiritually dead. For a time
they will keep the shape and the appearance of a living ciiurch, but
like all these churches separated from Rome, they instatitly die.
They have no supernatural life. They did not abide in him the
head of the churcli. 'J'hey will keep for years the form and ap-
• John XV. 1,8. » John xv. 5. * John xv. 6.
HOW MANY CHURCHES BELONG TO CHRIST ? 105
pearance of a church, they will attract people by the teachings of
Christ, they received from the catholic church before their sep-
aration, but little by little, they will lose the forms, the customs,
the teachings of the true church, they will fall away from gener-
ation to generation, into infidelity. The younger generation become
infidels in sjjite of the attractions of society, the continual " drum-
ming up^' of the minister. This we see takes place what the
prophet says: '' The nation and the kingdom that will not serve
thee shall perish." '
It is evident then that other ciiurches do not belong to Christ.
They were formed at the reformation from the remains of the
teachings and the doctrines, they received from the catholic
church. They were founded for the most part on some peculiar
doctrines, which became prominent at that time of religious and
political excitement. Every doctrine, every custom, every church
form of government they have kept as parts of the catholic church.
Whatever people admire in other churches, what speaks to human
reason, religious teachings and things men love and venerate in
other church denominations, they will find them in the catholic
church, but perhaps under another name, or more or less hidden
in our vast ceremonial. Then persons coming from another
church into the catholic church, must not give up anything
they admire in their own, or throw off these things which speak
to reason. Let them keep all these, believe a little more get
cleared up their ideas about God, Christ, the Eedemption, and
the way of saving souls. Let them keep what they learned at
their mother's knee, come into the bosom of their true mother
the spouse of Christ, let them break off from that church founded
by men, and come back to the church of their fathers, and there
draw from the fountains of the Saviour grace, peace, rest, redemp-
tion, salvation.
No people can form by themselves a congregation or church,
claiming that they follow the teachings of Christ. For number-
less are the false churches thus organized. They must be born of
the parish and of the diocese, who in their turn come from the
Roman Pontiff. St. Augustine truly says: "Heretics think false
things about God, and call it their faith. Schismatics, by bad dis-
putes, cut themselves off from brotherly charity, although they
believe what we believe." " "^ No heretics who separate from the
church but believe that they still hold the right doctrine," says
St. Jerome. No people yet separated from the church, but who
supposed that they were doing right. They lost their faith
planted in them by the Holy Spirit at their baptism, and by some
continued sin, by their neglect of the sacraments, or by some
allurement of the world, the devil or the flesh, they lost that
faith and left the church.
The unity of the church comes from the one Holy Spirit, the
hearts of the people, united to Christ, as St. Paul says: " Who hath
* Isalas Ix. 12. ^ pg pj^jg gj Syrab.
106 UNIOX ox FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES.
delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us
into the kingdom of the Son of his love. . . . who is the image of
the invisible God, the first born of every creature, And he
is the head of the body the church. . . Yet now he hath in the
body of his flesh through death, to present you holy and blame-
less before him." ' How false it is to say that all christians may
be united on fundamental principles, and divided on non-essential
doctrines Will appear in the following pages. No nation can
allow citizens to judge the laws they will keep, and break or
allow them to reject the laws they do not like. Where can you
find a body of men in business, in an army, in a nation, in a
company, even a few men working on a railroad without a head
or a man over them Avho binds them together by his authority?
How insane in religion must be the people, who try to found a
church, without a head. There is an element of insanity in re-
ligious matter, or there would not be so many churches, all
claiming to be the church of Christ.
Human reason relates to the things of this earth, while re-
ligion is the bond of union between God and man. As religion is
the supernatural in man, the supernatural is above reason and
above nature which guides man on earth and is incapable of the
things of God. From this it follows that only God can tell men
the way he will be worshipped, the service he will receive. No
worship will God regard but that which comes to him through
Christ, his Son, who in the incarnation united man and God and
opened heaven to his brethren. As the Bible is the word of God
given to man, to the church belongs the power of defining its
meaning. If God wished that every one would understand the
Bible he would have written it as easy and as plain as the sun-
light. But it is so difficult, that the most learned men cannot
understand it. Even the greatest and most learned saints
admitted they could not understand its meaning. The division
of churches, all following the Bible, show they differ as to its
meanings. There must then be some court, some tribunal
established by God, to teach mankind the meaning of his re-
vealed word, — That is the church which through her visible head,
officially proclaims the meaning of the Scriptures.
How often find we the kingdom of God mentioned in the Bible? '
The prophets foretold so often the coming of his kingdom, that the
Jews supposed the Messiah would come and make of them rulers
over all the earth. That error had been so ingrafted into them, that
they refused to receive our blessed Lord because he came so poor
and lowly. Everywhere the Old Testament tells us of the *' house
of God ■' " the kingdom without end " '* the house of David the line
of Judah. " On almost every page the New Testament proclaims
the beauties of the church, the founding of his kingdom, the
members of his members, the beauties of his religion. No pas-
I C0I088. 1. 13, 15, 22. * Matt. xli. ».
INTERIOR OF THE CATHEDRAL, MEXICO.— THE LARGEST CHURCH IN AMERICA.
108 SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES.
sage of Holy Writ speaks of many churches or of more than one
church. Search the Scriptures for the purposes and perfections
of his only church. Read the 1st and 5th Epist. of St. Paul to
the Ephesians: the 12th to the Corinthians; the 5th to the Rom-
ans ; the 1st to the Colossians ; the 3rd to Titus ; the 5tli to the
Galatians, and the revelations given to St. John in the last book
of the Bible. Study the Apostles Creed, the Creed of the
Councils of Nice and of Constantinople. Study the writings of
the fathers, and you will find that there is but one only church
of Christ, and there can be but that one form of religion found-
ed by Christ, for the teaching of the nations, for the saving of
souls. That church lived and survived the storms of all ages from
now back to the time when the Saviour walked the earth.
Each person, who recites the creed says "1 believe in one holy
catholic and apostolic church. " Such is the burden of the service
which ascends from every church which believes in God the
Saviour. The church one holy catholic and universal, presided
over by the Vicar of Christ, overshadows all the dioceses. They
live in her bosom. The diocese extends over all the parishes and
churches within her limits. They receive their life from her, and
she gets her existence, her teaching, her redemption from theuniver-
sal church. The diocese comes from the universal church as the
Son comes from the Father. The parish comes from the church
universal and from the diocese, as the Holy Spirit comes from
both the Father and the Son. All the Son has he gets from the
Father, all the Holy Ghost has he receives from both the Father
and the Son. All power and life and doctrines in the diocese come
down from the church universal, from the Vicar of Christ, who
officially proclaims Avhat Christ has revealed in the Bible and in
the traditions of Christianity. From the church universal, and
from the bishop of the diocese, the parish receives its sacraments,
its teachings, its regulations, its power, which bind it back into
that one whole organization, the universal church, Christ's king-
dom on tiie earth.
«From Christ who came to fulfil all prophecy, the church univer-
sal received her teachings and her doctrines. Her head the Vicar
of Christ finds in the Bible, in the traditions of the apostles, in the
works of the fathers, in the traditions of all nations and churches
the true teachings of the Lord. In his official capacity, as head
of the church, as the confirmer of his brethren,' he teaches all
men the truths revealed to the churches. 1'he bishop comes down
from him and from the church universal, from which he received
episcopal consecration, down he comes to the diocese, and thus he
comes bearing with him all the riches of the universal church. He
comes to his diocese, to whom the Pope sends him as the father sent
the Son into the world to teach the world the way of salvation.
From the universal church and the diocese the priest comes down
into the parish, bringing with him the Bible, the sacraments and
• Luke xxil. 32.
DEAD SBPAEATED BRANCHES. 109
the means of redemption and salvation to the members of his parish.
All he receives from the Father the Son brought to the earth. All
spiritual riches the bishop receives from the church universal,
he brings to the diocese. All power the priest gets from the diocese
and the universal church, he carries with him to the parish and
deals out these mysteries of redemption to the souls under his care.
Who can suppose the Son separated from his Father ? What
bishop can separate from his father the Pope ? what priest can be
divided from his father the bishop of the diocese ? what congre-
gation can separate from their pastor ? what nation can be in-
dependent in Spiritual things of the Vicar of Christ who died
to redeem the nations ? The church then cannot be separated
into branches. The branch cut off from the trunk of a tree at
once dies ; the member cut from the human body withers ; the
church which separates from the Soman Pontiff separates from
Christ of whom he is the Vicar.
There must be some judge to decide the questions of religion,
these vital issues which rise every year and everywhere among
men. The judges of the civil courts cannot decide matters of
religion, for they pass only on civil and criminal disputes between
men. " Going forth therefore teach ye all nations. " The church
is the teacher of every man in every nation. The civil judges,
of nations cannot teach her. There must be then a supernatural?
tribunal, like the tribunal established by Moses for the ending of
disputes about religion. He must be a judge, before whom alii
men will bow and who receive his words his final sentence, to
end the controversy. In the churches outside the catholic church
there is no end of disputes, of misunderstandings, of the divisions
of churches, of the founding of different beliefs. In the church
of God, there is but one belief, one faith one form of religion. The
moment that the Bishop of Rome proclaims that such a doctrine
has been revealed by God and that it is contained in the deposit
of faith, the dispute ends. Peter has spoken by the words of his
successor, and all minds in the church bend before his official de-
cree. The living teaching power of the highest court of the
church ends all dispute, and thus the church is one. Outside the
church, these who reject this teaching power, try to set themselves
up their own teacher, they claim that they can interpret the
Bible by the light of the Holy Spirit. In this way they deny the
teaching power of the Pope, and make themselves their own pope
and teacher of God's word.
Therefore the teaching power of the church is clear to all minds.
They believe what the church teaches, whether they understand
it or not. The wise and the ignorant, the simple and the learned,
the women and the children, all feel that they are safe within
her fold, as the prophet foretold of the church. " And a path
and a way shall be there ; and it shall be called the holy way, the
unclean shall not pass over it, and this shall be to you a straight
way, so that fools shall not err therein. "
' Isalas XV. 8.
110 THE CHURCH IK THE BIBLE.
Many times in the Gospel the Lord uses the word church; but
he means one church and he speaks not of many churches. Thus
He says " He that will not hear the church let him be to tJiee as
the heathen and the publican. '^ ' He speaks of the church in
numerous figures. Thus he tells us of the " city on the moun-
tain which cannot be hid.'"' He frequently mentions his "King-
dom'' ''the house of God'' " the kingdom of heaven." Speak-
ing to Peter, Christ says "Upon this rock I will build my church'"
not churches, for he came not to build many but only one church
in union with him through Peter and his successors.
Forty-seven times the word church is found in the Old Testament
and in each passage it means but one church, one way of worship-
ping the Lord before the coming of Christ. That was the
Jewish church, tlie religion and the law of Moses established by
God. From no other altars did God receive the sacrifice of
prayer. They were all abominations to him. The law of Moses
and the religion of the Jews were but preparations and figures of
the church of God.
The church being one with Christ, and through him one with
the Persons of the Trinity, it follows that she has the same author-
ity as God. Thus Christ says " Amen I say to you whatsoever
you shall bind upon earth shall be bound also in heaven and
whatsoever you shall loose upon earth it shall be loosed also in
heaven."* Twenty-four times the church is mentioned in the
Acts of the Apostles, and you find but one church mentioned.
Sixty-eight times St. Paul speaks of the church in his Epistles,
everywhere meaning but the one church of God. Fifteen times
St. John mentions the church in his revelations in the Book of
the Apocalypse, and in every text where he uses the word, he
tells us of one church. Nowhere do we find even the faintest hint
of the many churches into which to-day the world is divided.
On the contrary we are warned in many passages against divisions.
Sometimes it is tru'e St. John speaks of the church at Ephesus, at
Smyrna, at Philadelphia, etc., but these were the different dioceses
into which the church was divided at that early date. They all
belonged to the universal church under Peter.
For according to the constitution of the church laid down by
our Lord, the universal church centers in the Primacy of Peter, to
whom Christ gave the charge of feeding his lambs and sheep.
The universal church built on the Papacy, the Eock of Peter, takes
in, embraces, absorbs, holds in its fruitful bosom all the particu-
lar churches or dioceses of the world, as each diocese in its turn
holds, embraces all the different parishes into which the diocese
in its turn is divided which it brought forth. But these particu-
lar churches the dioceses live, have their being, derive their life
from the universal church, of which they are so many images and
daughters, whom the universal church brought forth to Christ
for the universal church is his spouse. The parishes and dioceses
> Matt, xvlll. 17. » Matt. v. 14. » Matt. xvl. 18. * Matt. xvUl. 18.
HOW CHRIST ORGANIZED THE CHURCH. Hi
depending from, coming forth from, deriving all their being,
life and very existence, from the universal church, through her
they are united to Jesus Christ.
Christ prefigured the ministers and priest by the seventy-two dis-
ciples, and he organized the episcopacy in the persons of twelve
apostles. That was but the frame work of the universal church, and
he left to the apostles the labor of carrying out the details of that
wonderful organization. We see the same thing in the organiza-
tion of the United States. The wise founders of the republic
first only laid down the general plan of the Constitution,
while they left the carrying out of the details to their successors.
In the same way Christ only laid down the general plan or out-
line of the constitution of the church, while he left to the supreme
Pontiffs, the successors of Peter, the authority of carrying out the
numerous details, by these words to Peter and in him to all his
successors: "I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of
heaven, and Avhatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be
bound also in heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth
it shall be loosed also in heaven." '
The one cliurch coming forth from God, as the universal
kingdom of Christ, liolds in its fruitful breast all the churches of
the world, the dioceses, the parishes the congregations, the peoples
of the earth. 'JMi rough their pastors, their bishops and the Pope,
through these they all unite into one church, one kingdom of
Christ, nil animated by one Spirit of Christ the Holy Ghost, who
comes forth from Christ as the Son comes from his Father God,
" itself being a mystery of unity. " ^ "Although the church
appears to be many, still it is single. Even if it seems by its lo-
cation to be divided, nevertheless in its completeness, the mystery
of its internal union cannot be corrupted." ^
The race of Adam, having lost their head by sin, having lost
the bond which united them, after the sin of Adam they scattered
over the face of the whole earth, and gradually thus they gave
rise to the various races of men. Having lost their natural ruler
and their i^aterntil king Adam, they replace him as best they can
by electing rulers in his place. The government of Adam being
the first established by God's natural providence and that having
been overturned by sin they replace it by choosing their rulers by
election. For that reason no civil government can be perfect.
Civil governments all bear the impress of the weakness of human
nature. Hence the discords of rulers, the divisions of politics,
the wars of nations, the disputes between politicians, the divisions
between diverse peoples, the peculiar customs and manners of na-
tions, the different tribes tongues and nations of the earth. These
divisions are results of the sin of Adam and of his death the natural
father of the race.
Christ came to repair the sin of Adam, to unite again the divid-
ed human race. Being the second Adam he takes his place, the
» Matt. xvi. 19. 2 St. Peter Dam. L. Dom. Verb. n. 6. » Ibid. c. 5, 6.
112 HOW CHRIST ORGAXIZED THE CHURCH.
new Adam as the head of the whole race. He founded the
church to replace the lost kingdom of Adam. Therefore the
church is one not many, as the race is one not many. The church
'' The Bride of the Lamb, " she who came forth from him in death
on the cross as Eve from the side of Adam, she brings forth her
children to Christ. She seeks out the scattered races of Adam's
lost kingdom and she absorbs them into her bosom. She incor-
porates them into the mystic body of Christ, and by that she
leads them up and into the society of the adorable Trinity in
membership with the eternal Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
The Spirit of Christ, the Holy Ghost who comes forth from
Christ as the Son from the eternal Father, that same Spirit of God
is the soul of the church. As the soul of man animates and makes
one body out of the different materials of which the human body
is composed, so the Holy Spirit animates, vivifies, binds together
and forms one church out of all the members of the race of Adam.
Both Christ and the Holy Ghost are whole and complete in the
church, one is the head, the other is the soul of that church, the
mystic body of Christ, which is " his fullness." While Christ is
her head, the Holy Spirit is in each and every part, whole and com-
plete, as the human soul is whole and complete in each and every
part of the human body. From the human head comes through
the nerves all the vital activity in the human body. The head of
the church being Christ, from him comes forth the Holy Ghost
into the church his body. As the vitality of the soul comes down
into the living body from the brain the head of the nervous sys-
tem, thus all supernatural life in the church comes down into her
his body, from Christ her head. But the human body even united
with the head could not live without the soul. So the church
could not live an instant separate from the Holy Spirit. The soul
of that body is the Holy Spirit who comes forth from Christ the
Son of God. As the soul animates the head as well as the body,
80 the Holy Spirit animates the whole church, the head Christ as
well as his body, his church.
Each spirit is one complete and whole, complete in each and
every part. Thus the Holy Ghost, who is the soul of the church
is whole and complete in each and every member and part of the
church, as the human soul is whole and complete in each and every
part of the body. Thus the diocese, the parish, the particular
church, each member or individual belonging to the parish has all
the privileges and the benefits of the universal church, whole and
complete in as far as they are useful or necessary for salvation.
Thus, each diocese, each parish each congregation has Christ as
its head, Christ lives in and through the bishop, the pastor or
clergyman at their head, as well as the universal church has him
at its head in the person of the Pope his Vicar overall the churches.
Living in and by the universal church, these particular
churches partake in all her riches, as they come forth as her
children and her heirs. For she brings them forth to Christ.
EOME THE HEAET OF THE CHURCH. 113
^' The gift of God belongs to each as much as it belongs to the
whole. " ' Each church can say : '' For a child is born to us, a son
is given to us and the government is upon his shoulder .... the
Prince of Peace his empire shall be multiplied .... he
shall sit upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom " * He,
the heir of the kingdom of David, he is the head and of all churches
and kingdoms, not only of the universal church but also of each
particular church or congregation throughout the world.
As in the human body the head and the heart are the chief cen-
tres of vital actions, so Christ the head of the universal church
has his chief place of activity the heart and the centre of the uni-
versal church. That is Rome the heart and the head of the christ-
ian world, there the Vicar of the Lord, one with Christ, sits and rules
the church his body, by his power and in his name. From the hu-
man heart the life-blood sweeps in crimson streams through the
arteries to nourish every member, and it is driven even to
the smallest cells which it penetrates to vivify and nourish. So it
is with the church of God. From Rome its heart the powers and
impulses of Christ come forth through regular channels, through
patriarchs, primates, archbishops and bishops, till it comes into
hearts and souls of the poorest and most humble members of the
church of God. Cut away a member from the body from heart's
blood and it dies. All in union with the centre of authority at
Rome, all feel the life-blood of the Son of God penetrating, healing,
binding up the wounds made in them by sin. Those churches, peo-
ples and congregations who are not in union with the heart and
with the centre Rome, and with the Vicar of Christ, those do not
belong to the mystic body of Christ. They are not in union
with him. They receive not his graces, his redemption. For they
can no more receive salvation without belonging to the body of
Christ, than a stick or a stone can receive the life-blood from the
human heart, when they do not belong to the body of the man.
The reader then will understand that the members of the fallen
race of Adam, the congregations, the parishes, the dioceses, the nat-
ions, the races of men, all together when baptized, all form the
whole church of God the body of Christ. All these compose the
one and only universal church. The congregations, the parishes
the dioceses, the national churches, all came forth from the uni-
versal church, as she in her turn came forth from Christ on calvary
as he in eternity came forth and is now, and always will be
coming forth from his eternal Father, as the Second Person of the
Trinity.
Thus on every side we begin to see the wonderful works of God
in his church. The Son born of the Father before all ages, "Light
of Light, true God of true God " comes forth into this world for us
men and for our salvation. Arising from on high, he comes and
takes upon himself our nature, and becomes a man. Sent into
1 John Iv. 10. St. Cyprian de Unltate Eccl. n. 5, « Isaias ix. 6, 7.
114 THE CHURCH GIVING ALL LIFE.
the world for that by his Father, from whom he came and is ever
coming forth, here he founds the universal church his body, by
which he embraces all the children of Adam. He the Word of the
Father, he founds the church in the persons of his apostles, whom
he sent to preach his word.
Wonderful is the mystery of the church of God, because it is the
most wonderful image of the Trinity we have as, it were the last
work of God upon this earth, a continuation of the Incarnation.
The faithful people live in and by the parish — the parish par-
takes of spiritual life in and by the diocese, — the diocese lives and
has its being in and by the universal church, the universal church
is the body, the bride the wife of Christ, in and by Christ she lives
in and by the Father from whom he is ever generated. "As the
living Father hath sent me and I live by the Father: so he that
eateth me the same also shall live by me, " ' says Christ, As he
lives by the Father so the church lives by him. " So do you also
reckon that you are dead to sin, but alive unto God in Christ Jesus
our Lord.''* The diocese lives in the universal church. "For
whether we live, we live unto the Lord; or whether we die we die
unto the Lord. Therefore whether we live or whether we die we
are the Lord's. " * Each member of the church lives the superna-
tural life of Christ and of God. " And I live now not I but Christ
liveth in me. And that I now live in the flesh, I live in the faith
of the Son of God, who loved me and delivered himself for me. " *
The church of God therefore is one, indivisible, indestructible,
unchangeable, eternal as the world and as tlie human race she was
sent to save. The spouse of the Lamb, the Mother of his children,
the Virgin who conceives and brings forth, while remaining still a
Virgin, as the Father brings forth the Son in heaven, so the univer-
sal church brings forth the dioccvse, these bring forth the parishes,
and these parishes in their turn bring forth and give birth to the
people of God without division or change, for she still remains the
Mother Virgin wife of Christ. The propagation of the species in
nature takes place by division of substance. But it is not so in
the church for there can be no division in her, for she is spirit-
ual like God and has no parts and therefore she cannot be
divided. She multiplies her children over the whole face of the
earth, and nourishes them with the body and blood and graces of
her head, Jesus Christ. She feeds them on his Body, and his
Blood. " For we being many are one bread, one body, all that par-
take of one bread. " * " In him and by him and througli him we
are one church all united through him to the Father, Son and Holy
Ghost,"ashe said. "And I in them and thou in me, that they
may be perfect in one. " *
This surprising oneness and unity of the church is what separates
and distinguishes her from all false and counterfeit churches, which
were established by men. The oneness and unity of the church
» John Tl. 88. » Kom. rl. 11. » Rom. xlv. 8. * Qalat. 11. ».
• I. Cor. X. 17. • John xvll. 23.
THE SOUL OF THE CHURCH. 115
extends beyond this world and takes in all the saints who now
rejoice in heaven. It stretches to the suffering souls of purgatory
and soothes those who are waiting for the coining of their salva-
tion, the day of their delivery. The church therefore extends
to heaven to purgatory and is spread through the earth.
It is a living body or organism animated by his Spirit, the Holy
Ghost, for it is his body. As head and body cannot be divided, so
the church or any part of it never be separated from Christ its
head. Each organism has a spirit, a soul, which holds it together.
The soul of the church is the Holy Ghost the Spirit of the Son
of God. Pie promised that the Holy Spirit would teach and speak
in the church. '•' For " he says '' it is not you that speaketh but
the Spirit of your Father that speaketh in you.^' ' No one could
enter that church unless he was born of that Spirit by the waters
of baptism. ''Unless a man be born again of water and of the
Holy Ghost he cannot enter the kingdom of heaven."" Life in
a living body comes from the animating soul within. So in the
church "It is the Spirit that quickeneth." ' Christ promised to
send the Holy Ghost to his church to remain in her forever, " I will
ask of the Father and he will give you another Paraclete, that he
may abide with you forever, the Spirit of truth whom the world
cannot receive."*
That Spirit of Christ is to teach man all things necessary
for salvation. " But when he the Spirit of truth is come, he
will teach you all things." ^ He calls him the Spirit of truth
because he comes forth from himself who is the Truth of the
Father. Proceeding from him in eternity, to show that divine
procession "■ He breathed on them and he said to them: Receive
ye the Holy Ghost."" Fifty times the Holy Ghost is mentioned
in the Acts of the Apostles, everywhere guiding directing and
sustaining the infant church. Ninety times the same Holy
Spirit is found in the rest of the New Testament. The church
therefore having only one Spirit must be one, for one Spirit
or soul always animates only one organism or body.
St.' Paul writing from his prison house to the Ephesians says:
" Careful to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace,,
one body, one Spirit as you are all called in the hope of your
calling, one Lord, one faith one baptism, one God the Father of
all, who is above all and through all and in us all. Until we
meet in the unity of faith and of the knowledge of the Son of
God."^ Who will say that there can be more than one true
church wherein " he gave some to be apostles and some prophets
and some others evangelists and other some pastors and doctors
for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry,^
for the edifying of the body of Christ." *
The church is one and undivided, because it is the most perfect
mage of the oneness of the undivided Trinity. From eternity the
> Matt. X. 30. 2 John Hi. 5, ^ John vi. ft4. •• John xlv. 16, 17.
s John xvl. 13. « John xx. 22. ' Eph. iv. 3, 4, 5, 6. "^ Eph. iv. 11, 13.
116 THE HOLY SPIRIT COMES DOWN TO US.
Pather and the Son dwell together, but their union is completed
and perfected by the Holy Spirit, who comes forth as the mutual
love of both. The Son, the Second Person of the Trinity comes
forth from "the bosom of his Father." * Coming forth from
the sanctuary of eternity he comes into the world on his mission
of salvation. ^ He becomes man *' and dwelled amongst us, " *
to redeem us. He comes to become the head of the church, the
head of the regenerated children of Adam. "Full of grace and
truth we have all received from his superabundance."* From
eternity the Father loved him and, because of him he also loves us,
made to the image and likeness of the divine Son. He is in us and
we in him, " I in them and they in me that they may be perfect in
one, and the world may know that thou hast sent me and hast loved
me." " " Thou hast loved me before the creation of the world."*
*' That the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them and
I in them." ^ But the Love spoken of here is the Holy Ghost, the
Love of the Father and of the Son.
Contemplate for a moment the Love of the Father and of the
Son coming down from the highest heavens, from the adorable
Trinity into the church which is one with the Trinity. Through
Jesus Christ the Second Person of the Trinity that Spirit em-
braces the whole church animates it, gives life to it, fills us
with charity, for " the charity of God is poured forth in our
hearts by the Holy Ghost who is given us," * he comes into the
church because he comes from the head Christ the Son of the
Father. As he is the head of the church, as head he sends the
Holy Ghost into the whole church his body that he may give
life to the whole organism. That Spirit of Christ broods over
the whole church, covering it, sanctifying it, blessing it, penetrat-
ing it, animating it, binding it together, uniting all its members
into one body which belongs to Christ its head. Coming into the
church from Christ its head, from whom he proceeds in eternity,
he animates the lowest member and sanctifies him, and continually
works to make him more and more like unto Christ the head.
He calls the clergy to their vocation, he sanctifies souls by the
sacraments, he inspires men with good thoughts, he entices them
to do good, he calls sinners to repentance, he goes after the stray
sheep, he pours out the graces of Christ on dying souls. All the
wonders of the supernatural life are worked by the Holy Ghost.
*' No man can say the Lord Jesus but by the Holy Ghost."*
" But in all these things one and the same Spirit worketh. For
as the body is one and hath many members, and all the members of
the body, whereas they are many yet one body, so also is Christ.
For as in one Spirit were we all baptized into one body. For the
body is also not one member, but many, that there might be no
schism in the body. Now you are the body of Christ and mem-
bers of member, and God indeed hath set some in the church first
> John 1. 18. » John vlU. 42. » John 1. 14 « Rom. t. 17.
• John xvll. 28. • Ibidem 24. » lb 26. • Rom. t. 6 • 1. Cor. xl. 8.
WHA.T IS HOLIifESS? 11?
apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly doctors, after that miracles
then the graces of healings " etc. ' The Holy Ghost then is the
*'Sign of Salvation, " ' the " Seal of redemption" "
The church is holy. Her holiness comes from Christ as St.
Paul says " Christ also loved the church, and delivered himself
up for it, that he might sanctify it, cleansing it in the laver of water
in the word of life." * Holiness is freedom from sin and firmness
in keeping the laws of God. Sanctity comes from the Latin, and
means washed in blood, — that is purified from every sin, by the
blood of Christ, * The tabernacle and all things used in the ser-
vices of the temple were sprinkled with blood, ' typifying that
every member of the church is washed in the blood of the Lamb
of God. For no one in sin is clean before the Lord. Then cleaned
from the filth of wickedness, from the passions which drag it
down, the soul of the christian stands firm in the law, in every
virtue of the christian. " He that loveth me keepeth my com-
mandments." '
Holiness comes into man by the infusing of the Holy Spirit,
who comes from Christ as the Son of God, whose blood washed the
soul from sin. Then the church is holy in her members, because
her head Christ is holy. For he was filled with the Holy Ghost,
*'full of grace and truth."* She is holy because she too is filled
with the Holy Spirit, who on pentecost Sunday, came down in the
form of firey tongues, and sat on every one of the apostles and
disciples. "
Coming down from the Father and from the Son from whom
he proceeds in eternity, the Holy Ghost comes into the church,
and takes up his abode in the purified hearts of the redeemed.
Ever coming forth from the Father and the Son, he ever proceeds
into the souls of men, and there he works in them his holiness,
giving rise to every virtue, coming into generations and gener-
ation of countless saints who live in every age.
Who can tell the hidden virtues of the saints of the church?
The constancy of the persecuted, the chastity of the virgins, the
heroism of the clergy, the firmness of those martyrs who died?
Who could describe sufferings of the church? the torn limbs, the
ghastly wounds, the flowing blood, the cold and hunger, the mental
anguish, the fierce hate of men, the rage of hell poured out from
the days of the crucifixion to the present time? The history of
the church is a tale of blood known only to God. We admire the
hero, but the world never saw a heroism which could in any way
€qual or approach the wonders of the saints and martyrs of the
church, who suffered and died from the time of Christ the first
and greatest martyr.
The nations have profited by her holiness. From the day when
Christ first sent his apostles forth to teach the nations, she has
» I. Cor. xii. ' Eph. 1. 13 ' Ibidem Iv. 30. * Ephes. v. 25, 36.
» See St. Thomas, Quest. Ixxxi. Art. 8. « Heb. Ix. 21, 23. •? John xlv. 15.
« John i. 14. » Acts. 11. 3.
118 WHAT IS A MTKACLE?
never ceased to raise them up from paganism and sin to a higher
life, a better form of civilization a more virtuous mode of life. All
great movements for the bettering of man took rise in her and
from her spread to the uttermost ends of tlie earth. Everywhere
her missionaries scattered, " preaching Christ and him crucified " *
almost without an exception the first missionaries were martyred
by the people they came to save. Thus Christ and his holiness,
living in his church is still crucified in his members.
The chief marks of holiness are miracles in Avhich God inter-
feres with the course of nature and the laws of the universe given
at the creation. A miracle is a wonder, worked by God to attract
the eyes of men to reward the faith of the good, and to draw men
to the church. In the early church many wonders were worked
so as to attract men to the church and to show the world her
divinity. The saints in every age performed miracles for their
holiness was such that God with all his power was Avith them.
After thQ ascension of the blessed Lord, the apostles went forth
and "preached every where, the Lord working with all and con-
firming the word with signs that followed."'' Many were the
wonders the apostles and their disciples wrought, by which the
ancient world was drawn to their teachings. St. Augustine says.
" The consent of peoples and of nations holds me in her bosom.
Her authority begun by miracles keeps me." " At many confirma-
tions in the early church the Holy Spirit worked the most stu-
pendous miracles. All these signs and wonders showed that the
holiness, the wisdom and the supernatural power of God was with
the church. God is the author of nature, and he can change
nature's laws and physical workings, when he wishes. This he did
that the human mind might be drawn to the church founded by
his Son for the salvation of mankind. No one but a stupid fool
would say God cannot suspend or change the laws he made for
the government of the universe he created.
' 1. Cor. 11. 2. » Mark xvl. 20. » St. Aur. Con. Epist. Fund. C. 4.
is catholic, that is
for universal. That
name was given her in the very
days of the apostles, who often
preached in that cultured language.
The church is catholic or universal
both with regard to time and place.
She is the very same now as in the time
,of the apostles, going back to the very
days of the apostles^ and she spread
among all nations where there are souls
to save. The church is called Roman
catholic, for her visible head the vicar
of Christ is the Bishop of Korae.
Without the Papacy there would not be to-day a man believing or
teaching the religion of Christ, for on this Rock the Lord built his
church " and the gates of hell did not prevail against her." '
The Church is universal Avith regard to time. We trace the
venerable line of the Roman Pontiffs from Leo XIII. back through
long reigns of spiritual rulers, to the day when Peter was cruci-
fied. Not a link of that golden chain was ever broken. We read ,
the histories of the bishops of Palestine, of Asia, of Egypt, of
France, of Spain, of England and of every country where
the Gospel was preached, and we find that many of the first bish-
ops of these countries were sent by Peter or by his successors to
preach the faith. They were all the spiritual sons of the Prince
of the apostles. We find no change of faith in the church. In
the church to-day we read the writings of the apostolic men and of
the converts of the apostles, when we study the Augustins, the
Gregories, the Chrysostoms, the Basils, the Jeromes, the Leos,
the Cyrils but we find no change. The chief ideas of this
book, the sublime principles of the Church universal;, the diocese,
the bishop, the presbyteries, the form of church government
may be found in the writings of St. Ignatius, the disciple of St.
Peter, the second after him to sit on the archiepiscopal throne of
Antioch. The ideas of the hierarchies of heaven and of the
1 Matt. xvi. 18.
119
TUE HEAD
OK THE CHURCH.
A BOOK ON THE CHURCH. 121
Church may be found in the writings of St. Dionysius, the
Greek, who at Athens cried out when he saw the sun darkened at
the crucitixion, " Either the God of the universe is dying or the
machinery of nature is dissolving.'^ ' When St. Paul later came
to Athens there preaching Christ crucified, Dionysius remem-
bered the darkening of the sun, he became a convert, and first
preached to the people of Letitia, ancient Paris.
The writer spent the early years of his priesthood reading the
great fathers of the church, the men taught by the apostles, and
there, in the cradle of the faith, he finds his ideas of the Church.
The man who writes a book on the Church ever lives in history,
and all ages to the end of time will profit by his work. The
Church cannot preach new doctrines. He who explains her
teachings gives her old dogmas in a new dress, adapted to our
age. When new doctrines arise and spread among men, we
search the Bible, the traditions of churches, the histories of na-
tions, the writings of the apostles, the traditions of Christianity
to see if they have been revealed by God. That tends to clear up
the truths held in "the deposit of faith."" If such truths are
found in the Scriptures and in the traditions of Christianity, the
head of the Church, he to whom was given to "Feed his lambs
and sheep," he who was commissioned to confirm his brothers, he
the heir of Peter, he officially pronounces that they were re-
vealed and then they become dogmas of faith for all mankind.
If these doctrines are not found in the Bible and in tradition they
are condemned as error, for revelation was ended and completed
by the coming of Christ, who while on earth taught all things re-
quired for salvation.
The Church is catholic, that is it spreads everywhere. For as
the Saviour died for all the children of Adam, she was founded
for them all. She has no peculiar mark or character of any na-
tion or people. She is as universal as the race. They partake in
her doctrines, her graces, her beauties, her perfections. To all
men the Church comes preaching salvation, peace, redemption,
charity, brotherly love. In every man she sees the image of God,
the likeness of the divine Son made man. To every man she
teaches the rights of men, the laws of God, the rights of proper-
ty, of life, of justice. In every nation she taught the sacredness of
life, the horror of war, the value of souls, the laws and principles
of the Gospel. From her the kings and governments learned the
misfortunes of slavery the rights of subjects, the way of government.
From her constitution of the papacy, the episcopacy, the dio-
cese and parish, men in former ages learned the constitutional
form of civil christian governments. Parliaments and Sen-
ates were founded by the teachings of her clergy in England,
France and other European nations. From them came our form
of government, where the rights of the people are respected, a form
of government spreading over all the earth. She is the living force
» Brev. Rom. 9 Oct. 2 i, xim. vl. 20.
122 CATHOLIC MEANS UNIVERSAL.
which brought forth our present civilization from the chaos of
paganism, and established the Christianity of our day. Every
good comes down tlirough her from God the Father of lights to
man, raising him up towards heaven through his Son Jesus Christ.
She is now spread over the world, teaching, refining, convert-
ing and softening the hard and stony hearts of men, left in
S2)iritual death by the sin of Adam.
To the king upon his throne she teaches the way of salvation
the same as to those who dwell in cabins. To the rich and poor,
to the holy and the sinner, to the wise and ignorant, to the na-
tions and to individuals, to the weak and strong, to sick and
well, to every creature of the human race she preaches the very
same doctrines, to all she says this is the way of eternal life, do
this and thou shalt live, come into my bosom and be saved; hear
me not and thou shalt be damned. He that heareth you heareth
me. " '■' He that believeth not shall be condemned." '
With her striking ceremonial, her ancient dead Latin lan-
guage, her Mass and sacraments, her ritual and Gospel, her un-
changing truth she comes to all men, seeking them out every-
where they have wandered, and to them all she tells the glad
story of salvation and redemption.
The church is catholic that is universal. The sun never goes
down upon her spiritual empire over the souls of men. In the
forests of the south, amid the snows of the frozen north, on the fiery
sands of Africa, amid the ancient religions of Asia, in the halls of
^statesmen, in the courts of kings, on vessels plowing the oceans,
in the professor's chair of great schools, in the laboratories of
of the learned, in the busy marts of commerce, in the family,
everywhere you find the doctrines of Church penetrating deep into
every heart.
No other church ever claimed to be catholic. The other
churches were ever national, and did not extend beyond the na-
tion or the race where first they took their rise. The religion of
the Jews was only for the people of Israel, they were chosen that
the Lord might be born of them, that they might prepare for the
coming of his Son. Born of Abraham they guarded the revela-
tion first given to Adam till Christ came to found his universal
church for all men.
The Church is apostolic that is, it comes down to us un-
broken from the time of the Apostles, her clergymen descend in
an unbroken line from the Apostles, who ordained them, and who
in turn were ordained by Christ. She preaches the very same
doctrines and truths which the Apostles preached in the days of
the early Church. "The Apostles" says Tertulian "founded
churches in every city, whence all the other churches received the
doctrines of faith, by this they became churches and children of
the apostolic churches, whence although there are many, there is
but one the first Church, from which all others come.
» Mark. xvl. 16.
THE MEANING OF MATTHEW AND MARK, 133
After the Ascension the Apostles made Jerusalem their home.
From the holy city they went forth to convert the Jews, who were
first called to the faith. But after Peters vision at Joppa, they
preached to the Gentiles. Among the jDagan nations they founded
many churches. St. James the first bishop of Jerusalem was put
to death by Herod. Simeon was consecrated the second bishop
of the holy city. '
St. Matthew, in Hebrew, gift of Jehovah jireached first in Judea.
He wrote his Gospel in Hebrew for the Jews of Palestine. Then
he went to the East and converted many of the Persians, Parth-
ians and Ethiopians, performing numerous miracles among them.
At one time he raised the king's daughter from the dead, when
the royal family and the whole province came into the church.
When this king was succeeded by Hirtacus, the latter wished to
marry Iphigenia, daughter of the dead king, Avhom St. Matthew
had raised from the grave and whom he had induced to take a
vow of virginity. When the king could not force her to become
his queen, he commanded his servants to put St. Matthew to death,
which they did as he was saying Mass at the altar. ^
St. Mark, in Hebrew, a sign, or from the Greek for hammer, a
Jew, the disciple of St. Peter, he was converted by him after the as-
cension. Some think he only translated into Greek the Gospel
St. Peter had written. He wrote the Gospel at the request of the
Romans, recalling to them what he heard from St. Peter, Avhom
he accompanied many years in his travels, visiting with him all
the churches. St. Peter revised his Gospel and commanded that
it to be read in all the churches. St. Peter sent him to found
churches in Aquilia and Egypt, where he became the first bishop
of Alexandria, after Rome then the second city of the world and
noted for its wealth, learning and culture. It was in the year 60,
the seventh of the reign of Nero, that Mark came to Egppt to be-
come the archbishop of Alexandria, the second see of the world.
Evodius at that time had been appointed by Peter at Antioch to
report to him at Rome the state of the churches of Asia.
St. Mark landed first at Cyrene, in Pentopolis, bordering on
Egypt, where he performed numerous miracles. In this ancient
land, where the gigantic works of a former civilization still stood,
there he first preached the religion of Christ. For twelve years he
traveled up and down the Nile valley before he took his seat as
first bishop of the great city, founded by Alexander and called
after his name. He converted many of the Jews, whose fore-
fathers had come to Egypt in the days of the Ptolemies and en-
gaged in trade. But his success roused a persecution against him,
and consecrating his disciple Anianus bishop, he retired to Pento-
polis. When after two years again he returned to Alexandria the
pagans called him a magician because of his wonderful works. On
the feast of the god Serapis, they found him saying Mass. They
tied him with ropes, dragged him during the whole day over the
1 Brev. Roman Off. * Brev. Roman, of St. Math. Sept. 21.
124 STS. LUKE AND JOHN.
ground and stones. At night they threw him into prison, and the
next day Monday April 25 in the year 68 put him to death.
St. Luke a native of the great city of Antioch the metropolis
of Syria, educated in her celebrated schools early became the dis-
ciple of St. Paul in his wanderings. He was a physician and a
painter. As many fables and peculiar histories of our Lord were
written about this time, which tended to bring ridicule on relig-
ion, which are probably contained to-day in the Apocryphal Gos-
pels, St. Luke wrote his Gospel to refute them. St. Paul is
generally believed to have corrected, and some say took part in
the actual composition of the Gospel of St. Luke.
In the year 56, St. Paul, the Latin for little, sent him with Titus
to Corinth. Latter he went with St. Paul to Rome, whither in
61 the latter was sent as a prisoner from Jerusalem. For two years
St, Paul with Luke lived in a hired house in Eome, where now
stands the church of St. Mary. There St. Luke wrote the Acts
of the Apostles. Later St. Luke preached in Italy, France, Del-
matia, and Macedon. He died by crucifixion.
The apostle St. John, in Hebrew the gracious gift of God, called
by the Greeks the Divine, was the most beloved of all the apostles
and dearest to the heart of our Lord. He lived 70 years after the
ascension, the last member of the apostolic college. He never
married because he loved the Lord. Into his care, Christ gave
his holy Mother, who lived with him as his adopted mother till
her death. He attended Peter in his ministry at Jerusalem. He
was with the other apostles when they met so often in the upper
chamber belonging to the mother of St. Mark, where the last
supper was celebrated, and where the Holy Spirit came down on
the apostles, St. Jerome and the breviary say he lived till
old age. When in 51 the first general council of the church was
called at Jerusalem, John was there with all the other apostles
and disciples of our Lord.' He made Jerusalem his residence for
a long time after the ascension, going on missions into many
places, especially to Parthia, preaching and converting many of
the people of this province. Even in our day, some of the cities
at the mouth of the Tigris and the Euphrates say their forefathers
were converted by St. John. In 62 he returned to Jerusalem,
where all the other apostles had gathered, where they elected Simeon
bishop of Jerusalem after the martyrdom of St. James. ' Diony-
sius, converted by St. Paul at Athens came to see St. John, and
there he met the mother of our Lord. He says that her appear-
ence was so striking, that if he did not know that there was a
God he would have fell prostrate before her and worshipped her as
a goddess.
St. John ever appears as a missionary bishop, taking possession of
no particular see. He preached especially in Lesser Asia, making
Ephesus his home, of which St. Timothv the disciple of St, Paul
was the first bishop. In all histories the authority of St. John
> St. aementof Alexandria. * Euseblus L. iif. c. it, p. 105.
* Dyooes. De Dlvln. Nomia.
TYPES OF THE FOUR EVANGELISTS. 135
appears as that of an archbishop, with metropolitan jurisdiction
over the churches of Asia Minor, which he founded and governed
till he died. He consecrated bishops and appointed them to the
different cities and towns.' As each of the apostles received apos-
tolic power in the universal church, he appears to have established
all the first bishops of Asia Minor. To his last day he continued
to visit the bishops and the churches he established. He deposed
a priest who wrote a false account of the voyages of St. Paul and
Thecla.
Soon after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Ronians under
Titus in 73, Ebion taught that Christ was not the Son of God, but
a created angel, conceived and born like other men, but that he
became the Son of God when the Holy Spirit came down on him.
Cerinthus also preached that the Jewish ceremonies of circumcis-
ion, etc., bound christians, that the world was not created by God,
that God was only an angel, as \Yell as other errors in matter of
faith. To refute these errors St. John composed his Gospel.
He wrote especially to defend the divinity of our Lord. It is said
he asked all the churches to pray for him before he began his sub-
lime description of the birth of the Son from the Father. ^ In 95.
he was arrested, sent to Eome, thrown into a vat of boiling oil,,
saved by a miracle, banished to the Isle of Patmos by the emperor-
Domitian, where he wrote the Apocalypse or Revelations,,
which close the Bible. In 97 he returned to Ephesus, where:
Timothy had been put to death a short time before, and he took
on himself the government of that vast diocese which he held till;
the reign of Trajan. His disciple St. Polycarp tells us that ha-
wore on his forehead a plate of gold when saying Mass.
The evangelists were seen in vision by the prophet Ezechial
under the form of mysterious animals, which commentators say
represented the four authors of the Gospels. St. John because of
his sublimity of thought is the eagle. St. Luke, because he begins
by the history of the sacrifices in the temple is typfied by the ox,
one of the chief victims of the sacrifice of the temple. St. Mark
begins by the preaching of St. John the Baptist like a lion roar-
ing in the desert and calling men to his baptism of penance for
the coming of the Lord, while St. Matthew begins his Gospel by
the geneology of Christ as a man, and for that reason he is repre-
sented as a man. Such are the types of the four Evangelists. The
word evangel comes from the Greek and means good tidings of
redemption. Gospel is an Anglo-saxon word and signifies a good
word, a joyful history, or God's word to mankind.
Apostle is a Greek word which means a messenger, one sent,
for the apostles were sent by our Lord to preach his doctrines to
the whole world. '' As the Father hath sent me so I also send
you. " ^ Going forth therefore preach the Gospel to every creature. *
The apostle Andrew, the Greek for manly, was a native of Beth-
saida on the banks of the Sea of Galilee. He was first a disciple
' Tertullian L. 4. Contra Marcion. ^ John i. 1. * John vi. 29. * Luke x?j. 15.
126 HISTORY OF ST. JAMES.
of St. John the Baptist, but when he heard our blessed Lord,
he was attracted to him b}' his grace and brought his brother Simon
called later Peter to the Lord. After the descent of the Hoi}'
Ohost, Andrew preached the Gospel in Scythia, Sogdiana, to the
Colchis and the Greeks, where he silenced the learned philosophers
of Athens. Authors say he travelled into Kussia, even to the bor-
ders of Poland. He was crucified on a cross made like an X in
the city of Patrae.
St. James from Jacob, the supplanter, called the Great, the
brother of John the Evangelist was the son of Salome the cousin
of our Lord's Mother. He was 12 years older than Christ. Li
the year 30, the persecution in which St. Stephen perished raged
jigainst the church in Judea and the apostle fled preaching even to
Spain. Herod Agrippa, son of Herod the Great, gained the confi-
dence of the lioman emperor Caligula, who gave him a part of his
father's dominions, and later the emperor Claudius added to them
Judea, Samaria and the surrounding country. Li the year 43, to
please the Jews at the ceremonies of the Passover, he began to
persecute the Christians, arrested St. James and condemned him
to be beheaded, a martyrdom which he suffered with great courage.
St. James the Less, the son of Alpheus and Mary, the sister of
the blessed Virgin, was the first cousin of our Lord. Some au-
thors say our Lord gave charge of the church of Jerusalem to St.
James, and he became its first bishop. In this case it appears that
here we first find the appointment of bishops, to a particular
See, made in the person of St. James. All the apostolic churches,
Eome alone excepted, lost their lines of bishops at some time dur-
ing the years of persecution, and this brings still brighter before
lis thelineof the Eoman Pontiffs, going backunbroken to St. Peter.
Saying Mass St. James wore on his forehead a plate of gold, the
first mitre of the bishop. It was a lamina of pure gold worn at
the same time by Sts. John at Ephesus and Mark at Alexandria.
It was copied after the mitre of the high-priest in the ceremonies
of the Jewish temple. The first bishop of Jerusalem was noted
for his singular piety and self-denial. He worked so many miracles
that even the Jews held him in great veneration. Kneeling often
in prayer, his knees became hardened like a camel's knees. He com-
posed an Epistle, which he sent to all the churches, showing them
that faith alone without good works will not save souls, lie ar-
ranged a liturgy or form of saying Mass and administering the
eacraments, which first learned by heart was later written by the
saints and reformed by St. Chrystom. It gave rise to the Greek
and other Eastern rites.
The Jews, maddened by the appeal of St. Paul to Caesar, called a
meeting of the Sanhedrim, a council of the chief authorities of
the temple under the high-priest Ananus, son of Annas, who put
our liord to death. They called St. James for trial before them,
accused him of breaking the laws, condemned him to be stoned to
death. First they took him to the top of the temple, and asked
A LETTER FROM OUR LORD, 127
t
him to renounce Jesus. Eefusing, he preached from the battle-
ments to a great assembly, who had come to celebrate the Pass-
over. They then threw him down. Nearly killed, he had barely
strength to rise to pray for liis murderers, when the rabble smashed
him with stones, and one hit him on the head with a club which
broke his skull. His death took place April 10 in the year 62, the
7th. year of the reign of Nero. *
St. Philip, the Greek for a lover of horses, born at. Bethsaida in Gal-
ilee was a married man who became a great saint. After the sep-
aration of the apostles, he preached in the two Phrygias. St. Poly-
carp the disciple of St. John the second bishop of Ephesus after
St. Timothy, lived for a time with Philip. St. Polycretes, the
successor of Polycarp at Epliesus, says that after his martyrdom,
St. Philip was buried at Hierapolis in Phyrgia.
Bartholomew, meaning Son of Tholomew or of a warrior, was
first named Nathaniel.^ He was a doctor or teacher of the Jewish
law, and at first one of the 72 disciples.^ He penetrated to the In-
dies, converting numberless persons. He usually preached from
the Gospel of St. Matthew, which he carried with him. Eeturn-
ing he went into Lacaonia, the people of which country he brought
into the church. From there he penetrated into greater Armenia,
where attacking the worship of idols, he was arrested and put
to death. Some say he died by crucifixion, others that he was
flayed alive.
St. Thomas, in Hebrew and Chaldaic a twin, after the descent
of the Holy Ghost, appointed Thaddeus to instruct and baptise
Abgar king of Edessa, who had before written a letter to Christ,
asking him to come and heal him of a disease with which he was
afflicted. *
Our Lord replied to his letter, that he must fulfil the things for
which he came, and return to his Father, who sent him, but that
after his ascension, he would send one of his disciples, who would
heal him and bring health to all his family. This promise was
fulfilled by Thaddeus, after the ascension who came cured the king,
baptised all his family and planted the faith in that country. When
the apostles divided the world and assigned a part to each, Parthia
a part of Persia fell to the lot of our apostle. He labored among
the Medes, Persians and other nations in these parts, penetrating
even to the Indias and Ethiopia, as the south-east of Arabia was
then called. He suffered martyrdom at Meliapor on the west
bank of the Ganges, where he was pierced with lances till he died,
because he had converted some members of the royal family. The
remains of christian doctrines are found in Thibet, Tartary and
in the East said to have been taught them by this apostle.
St. Jude, praised, called also Thaddeus that is the wise, first
labored in the kingdom of Edessa, where he converted the royal
family and members of the court, although some say this Jude
> Butler's Lives of the Saints. * Am. Cyclopedea Bartholomew.
' Butler's Lives of the Saints. ♦ Euseblus. Hist. L. L C. 13 p. 36.
128 STS. SIMOX, MATTHIAS AND JUDAS.
•
wasanotlier person one of the 73 disciples. He preached in Judea.
Samaria, Edumia, Mesopotamia, L^bia and neighboring coun-
tries. After the death of his brother, St. James, he returned to
Jerusalem in G2, where he assisted at the election of his other
brother, St. Simeon, as the second bishop of the hol}^ city after the
martyrdom of St. James. He then wrote an Epistle to all the
churches, which became a part of the New Testament. He com-
posed it especially against the heretical Simonians, Nicholites and
Gnostics. Then he travelled into Persia, where at Ararat, in
Armenia, he was shot to death by arrows, or as others say he was
crucified.
St. Simon, in Hebrew hearing with acceptance, for his zeal called
the Zealot went first to Mauritania. Some writers say he also
preached in Britain. He spent some time in Egypt and other
parts of Africa. He was martyred at Suanar in Persia, being put
to death by the pagan priests.
St. Matthias, in Hebrew gift of Jehovah, one of the 72 disciples
of our Lord was elected an apostle in the place of the traitor Ju-
das. * After the coming of the Holy Ghost, he preached es-
pecially the obligation of self-denial and the mortification of
our passions. The traditions of the Greek church say that he
planted the faith in Cappadocia and along the shores of the
Caspian Sea, fixing his see at the little city of Issus. He was mar-
tyred at Colchis.
All know the history of Judas who sold his divine Master for
about 118. Getting sorry he brought the money back to the Jew-
ish priests. When they would not take it he threw it to them,
saying he had betrayed an innocent man. Falling into despair he
took a rope and hanged himself to a fig-tree on the side of Cal-
vary. The next morning the rope broke and the body burst, and
when the crowds accompanying our blessed Lord to the crucifixion
passed by the wild dogs of Jerusalem were feeditig on his flesh.
> Acts.
Christ, "true
*' The Lord of
the " King of
true God,"
lords'' and
kings," the last heir of the
throne of David comes down from
the ** Father of lights" to become
the supreme spiritual ruler of the
Church. By right of creation and
of redemption he governs his Uni-
versal Church, each diocese, each
parish and each soul baptized, who by that becomes his child sub-
ject to the laws of the Church his empire.
Before he left the earth he gave his ministers, his priests and
bishops supreme authoritv over his people and sent them forth
with all his power. On them he built his church which he organ-
ized according to the eternal decrees and truths, which he receives
with his nature from his eternal Father. His last forty days be-
tween the resurrection and the ascension, he spent with his fol-
lowers explaining to the apostles the wonderful organization of his
PETER STILL TEACHING THE ONI VERSA L CHURCH.
CHRIST'S PRIME MINISTER. 131
church his kingdom on the earth. St. John says that if all he
told them were written, the world would not hold all the books.'
We find these teachings in the Acts, in the Epistles of the New
Testament, in the church organization and in the writings of thf>
early fathers who gathered up the teachings of the apostles. We
must now see how Christ now rules and governs this spiritual em-
pire of souls purchased by his blood. Kings and emperors rule
not by themselves but by others to whom they delegate their au-
thority. Emperors, Kings and Queens, the President of the
United States cannot personally oversee all the details of their
governments. They delegate departments of the government to
their ministers. They often appoint a prime minister to take charge
of the universal external department of the scate, while inter-
nal affairs are in the hands of other heads of the departments or
bureaus.
Christ was a wise and farseeing statesman. He appointed and
ordained his apostles bishops over the priests and ministers he
ordained. In the apostles the priests and ministers he founded the
universal church." Then to bind them all into one universal
sheepfold, he raised up one of the apostles to be his prime minister,
his ruler, one with him, bearing his delegated authority, ruling
his constitutional empire of religion, that his church might re-
main one and indestructible, till the end of time. That visible
head of the church was Peter. His office was to descend to Peter's
successors in the See of Rome. He chose Peter one of the apos-
tles, so that the church might be ruled by an apostle, a bishop,
and not by one of the inferior ministers, the higher by the lower.
As the government of Christ was to last as long as the church, so
the heir of Peter was to ever be the visible head of the church.
Then he returned to the glory of the Father, which he had with
him before the world was, for he was not to ever live in the suffer-
ings of this world, for he suffered once and that was enough to
redeem us.
In holy orders the bishops are equal. ''Wherever the bishop
is, either at Rome or at Eugubius, he has the same merit and
the same priesthood."^ "The other apostles were the same as Peter —
all equal with the same power and honor."' "For Peter and
John were equal in honor and dignity, and the bishop of Rome is
no greater in orders than the bishop of any small city." " How
many reading such texts go astray, not thinking that all this re-
lates to holy orders and not to jurisdiction. In holy orders
bishops are all equal, for all receive the fulness of the Priesthood
of Christ. But in jurisdiction, or in the power of ruling spiritual
subjects, they are not equal, for to Peter, Christ gave full power
of binding and of loosing, of feeding his lambs and sheep. The
Bishop of Rome the successor of Peter is at the head of the universal
visible church, while the bishop is at the head of his diocese.
1 John xxl. 2, 5. 2 concil. Trident. s st. Jerome Epist. 140 ad Evang. n. I.
* St. Cyprian De Unitate Eccl. n. 4. * St. Cyril Alexandria.
132 THE OFFICE OF VICAR.
Then the Pope, as the heir of Peter, has a power and an authority
over the church not fou^nd in holy orders, which comes from
his position as bisliop and head of the diocese of Peter, whom
Christ made the rock, the corner-stone of the whole church
the one foundation with him.
For Christ and Peter became one authority and government. For
'the agent, the prime minister, the vicar form but one government
with the ruling power who appoints him. "Thus there are not
many but one government, and not one body like a monster
with two heads, namely Christ and Peter, the Vicar of Christ, and
the successor of Peter, the Lord himself saying to Peter, **' Feed
my sheep" he said generally not singularly these or those." '
The church universal being the diocese of Christ, and each
diocese proceeding from the universal church, in each diocese we
find an image of the universal church her mother. Each bishop
chooses from the ranks of the priests his vicar -general, who be-
comes one in authority with the bishop, for they form one govern-
ment over the diocese. The vicar-general does not get his power
from the election of the priests, for they have no episcopal juris-
diction. The vicar of the bishop has jurisdiction and power over
them, which he receives from the bishop. Not from his priest-
hood or from holy orders does the power of the vicar-general of
the diocese come, but from the jurisdiction of the bishop. What
the vicar-general does in his office as vicar of the bishop, binds
the bishop and no one can appeal from the vicar to the bishop, but
to the archbishop for they are one and the same authority. The par-
ish is an image of the diocese and of the universal church, and the
vicar of the pastor is one authority with the pastor. The vicar or
assistant of the pastor does not get his authority from the people,
whom he rules, but from the bishop and the pastor. Thus we see
that the office of vicar runs all through the church from the Pope
down to the bishop of the diocese. The vicar has the fulness of
the power of him he represents, as the prime minister of a king, the
cabinet minister of the president, the congressman the agent have
the fulness of the power of the persons for whom they act. Thus the
vicar-general in a diocese, forms one governing power with the
bishop, the Pope is one with Christ in the whole church. Christ
and the Pope are one and the same governing power and authority
over the universal church.
The governing power and jurisdiction over the whole church
then is one not double but one, as the episcopal authority in the
diocese is one. Thus Christ rules his church through and by his
vicar, the Bishop of Rome. In order not to lower the episcopacy,
Christ did not make the Papacy an order over the bishops, stand-
ing as it were between him and the bishops, who have received
the fulness of his spiritual power in holy orders, for there can be
no order higher than that of the bishop, for each bishop is a per-
* Boniface viii. Unam Sanctam.
THE FOUNDATION ROCK OF THE CHURCH. 133
feet priest, and nothing can be more than perfect. But .he made
Peter one with him in jurisdiction. There is the rock, the founda-
tion on which he built the church, Christ still being the head of
each diocese and the head of the universal church, individualized in
the Bishop and diocese of Rome. He is then the everlasting
source of power and of jurisdiction of the whole church. For to
the other apostles he conferred only holy orders. Then to these
spiritual powers he added in the case of Peter full jurisdiction
saying, " Feed my lambs. Feed my sheep." '
Thus Peter is the key-stone of that wonderful arch, the church
build of every diocese and parish and congregation throughout
the world. The Pope then is not like a chairman elected by the
bishops to preside over their deliberations. His authority does
not come from the votes of the other bishops. For they have not
authority over the church universal, they rule only in their own
dioceses, and what they have not they cannot give. The authority
of the Pope over the universal church comes to the Bishop of
Rome through Peter, who received it from Christ, whom he
made one with him. For the church has only one head, one
government, one teacher, one sanctifier, one king and supreme
ruler Jesus Christ ever visible in his Vicar. This the council of
Florence defined " The Roman Pontiff is the true Vicar of Christ,
{ind the head of the whole church."*
While on earth Christ organized his church. To guide her
till the end of time, he gave his apostles her constitution, her rules
and laws which were to direct her movements, for ''of his king-
dom there shall be no end."^ That constitution must not be
changed. For things which change perish by change. The presi-
dent of the United States cannot change our constitutiou. The
same power which gives a constitution is required to change it.
Only Christ himself could change the constitution of the church.
No one now is equal to Christ in the church. We are only his
ministers, his administrators. The vicar-general in the diocese, the
Vicar of Christ, the Pope cannot change the laws made by their
superiors. They only administer them. Thus the Pope cannot
make any new doctrine. He must keep the "deposit of faith "
revealed by Christ when he was on this earth, which is contained
in the Bible and in holy tradition. This the Vatican Council pro-
claimed: " For the Holy Spirit did not give to Peter and to his
successors, that he revealing they might teach new doctrines, but
that by his aid they might guard the revelation given by the
apostles and faithfully teach it." '
At the beginning of his public life, our Lord unfolded to his
apostles his grand design of establishing the Papacy, that one au-
thority to rule the others in order to keep his church one and un-
divided. At Cesarea Philipi he tested the faith of his apostles.
1 John xxl. 18. 2 concil. Florent. Apiid. Lab. T. xii. col. 515.
^ Luke i. .33. ■• Concil. Vatican, held in 1870. Pastor ^ternus.
134 MEANING OF PETER AND THE KEYS.
**Jesus said to them: But whom do you say I am?" While the
others gave different answers Simon replied: " Thou art Christ the
Son of the living God." * As a reward for his lively faith, our Lord
said to him: " Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build
my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it, and
I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatso-
ever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be bound also in heaven,
and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also
in heaven/"
The word for " keys " here means in Greek a key, a bolt, any-
thing which fastens a door or trunk," Although in ancient times
they had no locks, yet they had many things to fasten with were called
keys. The one who had the key could open or close the door to
any other. To give the keys of a city to a man is to honor him
with the freedom of the city. Thus Christ gave the opening or
the shutting -of heaven to Peter. The word for the kingdom of
heaven means in Greek, not only a kingdom, but also power of a
hereditary monarchy.* It means the keys of the kingdom of the
heavens, for in Greek and Latin heaven is in the plural. By these
words the Lord makes Peter his agent to bind or loosed in heaven
by his official acts, and to rule men as the minister of Christ, for
his official acts bind Christ who sent him.
Later Christ gave the power of loosing and of binding to Peter
and all the apostles together. For the Pope and bishops assem-
bled in council have the power of binding and of loosing, by the
laws and enactments they make for the discipline and government
•of the whole church.
He then and there changed his name to Peter that is, " The
Rock " on which the church was built. Before that his name
was Simon Bar-Jona. When God before gave any man a re-
markable work to do, he changed his name. Thus, the first man
he called Adam that is of the earth, the first woman Eve, the
mother of all the living. Abram, " the father of light," he changed
to Abraham, " the father of a multitude," and Jacob, "the sup-
planter," he changed to Israel, '^ ruling with God," In our
day Popes change their names on ascending the throne of Peter,
Following these customs our Lord changed Simon^s name to
Peter,* meaning in Hebrew, Syro-Chaldaic, Greek, Latin, French,
etc., • The Rock. Christ is the " Rock of Ages " struck by
Moses in the desert, from which flowed the waters of life to heal
the hearts and souls of men wounded by sin.' He is the "corner
stone" of the universal church, * rejected by the bad and wicked
Jews, which became the head of the corner. He is the foundation
of the universal church. For that reason each church has a corner-
stone, laid with great ceremony, representing Christ the rock on
which the universal church rests.
> Math. xvl. 15, 16. * Math. xvl. 18, 19. * Homer's Od. 21. 6.
•• Thuo. 1. la ; Arist. Pol. ill. 14. » See Greek Testament.
• The Syro-Chaldftic has not genders as In other lanfoiages. ' Num. xx. 10.
• Mark xil. 10.
THE ROCK OF AGES. 135
He made Simon Bar-Jona one with him, the corner-stone of
the whole church, and in the Popes that corner-stone will last till
the end of time.
The prophet Daniel saw that stone of the Papacy '' cut out of
the mountain not made with hands " that is the divinity of our
Lord, and he looked till " it struck all the empires of idolatry and
of paganism and filled the whole earth.' Isaias saw that stone in
the shape of a mountain. *'In the last days the mountain of the
house of the Lord shall be prepared on the top of mountains, and it
shall be exalted on the above the hills, and all the nations shall
flow into it."'
Thus did the inspired prophets see the glories of the house of
Peter, centuries before the coming of our Lord. But it is only the
glories of Christ himself. For as the agent, the minister is one
with he who sends him, so the Vicar of Christ and Christ are one,
as St. Leo says: "He united him with himself in an undivided
unity, and wished him to be called by the same name, saying
'' Thou art Peter," etc. ' "As to say I am the Rock— the inde-
structible stone on which the church is built, I will make thee Sim-
on The Peter, that is The Rock on which I will build my church,
that the foundations may rest unshaken for eternity, and not be
laid on the changing and shifting sands of worldly teachings." *
For the church was to be built so that "the gates of hell should not
prevail against it." *
Thus numerous other diocese fell away from the church, they
went down because of the infidelity of the people, because of the
sins of christians, because of the infidelity of pastors, because of
the misfortunes of politics, because of the horrors of war and of
conquest, as seen in the destruction of the great historic churches
of the East. The lamp of faith which once burned in them was
taken away as, St. John prophesies in his Revelations. The Roman
diocese ever stood because of the faith of Peter. And still she
stands like a vast pillar of light to the nations, her feet on earth
her head in heaven, tossed by storms of error still she stands, her
head upheld in heaven by the Son of God, who said that " The
gates of hell shall not prevail against her." ' Christ gave to Peter
the keys of the kingdom of the heavens. AVhat a wonderful power
to open or lock the doors of heaven, where God dwells with saints
and angels, that no man of the fallen race of Adam can enter
there unless Peter opens to souls suppliant at the feet of Peter
and his successors in the See of Rome! Who does not wish to
go to heaven? That is written in the very nature of men. For
all seek joy *nd happiness. But to go back to heaven and
leave the key of the door to one man, that is v/onderful: but
that Christ did, that we might know the power he left to Peter,
so that no one might doubt Peter's authority as one with that of
Christ.
> Dan. 11. "M, 3.5. - Isaias 11. 2. ' Eplst. x. n. 4. * St. Leo Sermo 83 n. I.
5 Matt. xxl. 18. « Malt. xvl. 18.
136 PETER AVENT FISHIKG.
When our Lord was at the last supper, when all the apostles
were at the table, at that solemn moment, before his death he
said to Peter, " Simon, Simon, behold satan hath desired to have
you, that he may sift you as wheat. But I have prayed for thee
that thy faith fail not, and thou being once converted confirm
thy brethren." *
In the Vulgate and other Latin versions of the Gospel, the word
which is translated: 'Miatli desired to have you," means to reach,
seek after, desire or wish to get you, that is not Peter alone, but
all tiie apostles — you being the plural of thee. The Greek word
used by St. Luke means to examine into you, to belong to or re-
view you, to join you. To sift you all as wheat, that is to separate
the good wheat from the chaff the bad, alluding to Judas and
those who fall away from the church. Tlie word translated " thy
faith" in the Greek is, thy faith thy trust, belief, faithfulness, or
means of persuasion and argument over others. Such are the
meanings of the word when used by Plato, Sophocles, Aristotle, &c.
St. Luke uses the word "pote," meaning "and when thou art con-
verted later confirm your brothers." He gives the Greek
*'sterizon," which means to confirm to firmly fix like the fixed
stars,* to make the other apostles immovable in the faith. What
remarkable words to show that Peter is to be the converter, the
power and the strength of the apostles against the wiles of the devil.
After the resurrection and before the ascension, when all the
apostles gathered at the Sea of Galilee, Peter said he was going
fishing. The other apostles said they would go with him. All
night they fished and caught nothing. When in the morning
the Lord Jesus came he told Peter to cast his net on the right
hand side of his boat.
"And now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of
fishes. Simon Peter went up and drew the net to the land full
of great fishes And although there were so many, the net was
not broken. When therefore they had dined, Jesus said to Simon
Peter, Simon son of John lovest thou me more than these? He said
to him: Yea Lord thou knowest that I love thee. He said:
Feed my lambs. He said to him again. Simon son of John
lovest thou me? He said to him: Yea Lord, thou knowest that
I love thee. He said to him: Feed my lambs. He said to him
the third time, Simon son of John lovest thou me? Peter was
grieved because he said to him the third time: Lovest thou me?
And he said to him: Lord thou knowest all things, thou know-
est that I love thee. He said to him: Feed my sheep."
Such was the triple commission given by St. Jehn an eye-wit-
ness. Nowhere in the Scriptures did God repeat three times his
orders. But this Christ did, so that there would be no mistake,
that the apostles and all men might know that Peter was
appointed the head of the apostolic college, the ruler of the sheep-
> Luke zxil. 81. 82. * Arat. 280, 274.
THE BEAUTIES OF THE GREEK TESTAMENT. 137
fold of Christ. Twice he told him to " feed his lambs," the laity,
and the third time he gave him power to feed his sheep, the other
dioceses and churches, the motliers of his laity his lambs. Some
Latin versions of the Testament say that the first time, Christ
said, "Feed my lambs" and the two last times he said ''Feed my
sheep." '
But the full beauties of Christ's words come out in the rich
Greek in which St. John wrote. The first and second times
that Christ asked Peter if he loved him, St. John uses the Greek
"agaj^as" which means to treat with regard and affection. In
such a sense Homer and the other Greek writers use it. " Xeno-
phon and later writers use the word to mean sexual love or affec-
tion. ° Xenophon used it in the sense of being satisfied or grati-
fied with any one. *
In the three replies of Peter to Christ, the Greek Testament says
Peter used the word "Phileo." The Greek authors employ this
word to signify the love of the gods for men, or to express the
higest kind of love. * As the ancients knew nothing of the virtue
of charity, which is the love of God above all, they had no word
to express so sublime a virtue, whence charity comes from earns,
dear. When they wished to express the highest kind of love the
Greeks used the verb "phileo." In the first two questions Christ
used the word "agapas," expressing friendship. In the last inter-
rogation he used the word ''phileo" expressing the highest and most
sublime love. Thus the early christians used to gather at a feast
and invite their friends to the banquet, and they called these
meetings, their love feasts, their ''agapas." Because of the abuses
at these feasts at which they celebrated the last supper or the
Mass, St. Paul reproves them. ® But when they wished to express
a higher and more sublime love, they used the word ''phileo."
From this comes philanthropy, the love of mankind, philosophy
the love of learning and numerous words expressing high and
pure love.
Each time Peter replied he used the word "phileo." Now we
begin to see the beauties of the Greek Gospel written in that
language by the beloved apostle. The two first times our blessed
Lord asked Peter, doest thou love me with the love of friendship.
Peter replied I do and more I love thee with charity, the highest
kind of love, higher than that of friendship. The last time Jesus
said to him, doest thou love me with the love of charity? Peter
saddened because his Master seems to doubt him replies, I love
thee with the love of charity. '
But there are other beauties in the Greek which neither the
Latin nor the English translations show. When Our blessed
Lord said to Peter the first time, "Feed my lambs," St. John
1 Novum Testamentum Ariae Mont. Vulg. Vei-s. Douay Bible.&c. ^ Od. L. C. 2. 224.
^ Luc. Jup. Trap. 2. ■• Xen. Mem. I. 5, 4.
« lb. 2. 197 Od. & 11. 146 & 15, 245 Soph. Ant. .54.3, &c, &c. « I.Cor. 11.
' See the Greek Testament of St. John by J. Leusden, published by Llpplncott, Philadelphia,
the Greek for city of brotherly love.
138 "FEED MY LAMBS FEED MY SHEEP."
uses a Greek word for lambs which has no nominative case. '
The Greek word for " feed " means to nourish, uphold, support. '
The next time Christ said 'Teed my lambs, " St John uses the
Greek word Poimaino, signifying to herd, cherish, guide, govern,
conduct. In Hebrew it is Rahah, that is to govern, or rule as a
prince, with external jurisdiction and authority. In Isaias, Cyrus.
King of Babj'lon, is called by the name rahah, the pastor of God.
" Who say to Cyrus : Thou art my shepherd. " ' In the same
word the Acts say the apostles are placed by the Holy Ghost to
rule the church of God. * Homer in the same way calls Aga-
memnon the ruler of men. The Greek Gospel gives each time
the plural case for sheepfold in the second and third orders to Pe-
ter, so that Peter received the power to feed, rule and govern the
sheepfolds, that is the churches of Christ. Besides this Christ
used three distinct words for lambs and sheep.
But that is not all. With prophetic eye our divine Master sees
that Peter will go to Eome, there establish his eternal See as head
and ruler of his everlasting sheepfold, that there he will stretch
out his hands like him upon the cross, his head down, thus will
he die at Rome, his body will be buried on the Vatican hill, that
Rome, his diocese, may receive all these spiritual powers over the
universal church just given him, and that his successors will be the
rulers of the people of God. The Son of God continuing says to
him.
*' Amen, amen I say to thee, when thou wast younger, thou didst
gird thyself and did walk Avhere thou woiildst. But when thou
shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall
gird thee, and lead thee whither thou wouldst not. And this he
said signifying by what death he should glorify God. And. when
he had said this he said to him: Follow me." '
Such was the appointment three times given to Peter, by which
he became the supreme Shepherd of souls, the Vicar of Christ.
*' There is certainly but one Shepherd, and one sheepfold, the
church of Christ, of whom Christ is the supreme Pastor ruling in
heaven, and he left one supreme Vicar on earth, in whose voice
the sheep heard the words of Christ."'
From the time that our Lord changed his name from Simon to
Peter, the latter always appeared as the head of the apostolic
college. In the Syro-Chaldaic there is no distinction of mascu-
line and feminine words as in the Greek and Latin, and the words
of Christ were "thou art no more Simon but The Rock, and on
thou the Rock, I will build my church, " etc. From that time
whenever the apostles were named together, Peter was always
named first. He alone walked upon the waters with the Lord.
To him the Father revealed the divinity of the Son. ' To him
alone the Saviour said " On this Rock I will build mv church and
the gates of hell shall not prevail against it, " ' while he says noth-
> Boske ta arnia. * See Homer Od. 11. 865. * Isaias zllT. 2& * Acts xx. 28
* Jobn xxl. 18, 19. • Plus vl. Bref. Super Solid. ^ Matt. xvl. 16. « Matt. xvl. 18.
PETERS FIRST WORKS. 139
ing about the other churches or dioceses represented by the apos-
tles. As St. Augustine says, " He is the Rock and the proud
gates of hell shall not conquer him."
To Peter alone our Redeemer said that whatever he should bind
upon earth it would be bound in heaven. When he said the same
to all the apostles, he meant that when the apostles and bishops of
the world met in council with Peter and his successors at their
head, that the laws they would make for the church universal,
would bind the consciences of men before God in heaven. The
blessed Lord went into Peter's boat and told him to put down his
net, when he caught a miraculous lot of fish. Christ prayed alone
for Peter at the last supper, that his faith might be fixed so he
might confirm the others. To Peter he first appeared after his
ascension, before he showed himself to any of the other apostles.
As St. Augustine says he first washed the feet of Peter. To him
alone he first revealed his death and resurrection. '
Peter called the apostles together that they might elect a suc-
cessor to Judas. After the coming of the Holy Spirit, Peter
first spoke in defence of the others. At his first sermon 3,000
<!onverts joined the church. He worked the first miracle by heal-
ing the lame man at the gate Beautiful. St. Chrysostom says that
after the resurrection, Peter passed from church to church visit-
ing all as their universal bishop. He exposed the hypocrisy and
lying of Ananias and Saphira who at his word fell dead. * To
him at Joppa God revealed that the Gentiles had been called
to the faith. ^ When he was thrown into prison, the whole
church prayed for him, as they recognized in him their supreme
Pastor, * which was not done when James or Stephen were arrested.
At the first council of Jerusalem j the voice of Peter decided
points of dispute. To him St. Paul came to give an account of
his labors. ° The traditions of the church carry out the teach-
ings of the Scriptures regarding the supreme apostolate of Peter.
Having raised Peter from the ranks of the. other apostles up to
the same supreme spiritual power with himself, after having
made him his Vicar or the principal minister of his eternal
jurisdiction with authority over the universal church, there is but
one ruling power in the church, that is the government of Christ
himself, who bore to earth all the power and might he received
from his Father with his divine nature. "All power is given me
in heaven and on earth. Going forth therefore teach ye all na-
tions. He that heareth you heareth me. As the Father hath
sent me so I also send you, he that heareth me heareth him that
sent me. " That was his commission to the whole church given
the persons of the apostles. They were the first bishops and rul-
ers of the different dioceses or spiritual states, of which these
apostles were to become the first governors and rulers. Later
in the church, the bishops had under them the priests and min-
> John xxi. 2 Acts v. ' Acts x. ■• Acts xii. « Gal. 1.
140 A CENTRALIZED GOVERNMENT.
isters attached to the parishes or counties, into which the dioceses
are now divided.
But a centralized and overshadowing power was required to
bind all these apostles or bishops, with their dioceses or spiritual
states into one kingdom and empire. For if there were no su-
preme ruling government, to which the other diocese would belong
and from which they would be born, there would not be one
church, but as many churches as dioceses. Christ saw the mis-
fortunes of divided churches. To unite them he takes Peter from
the ranks of the apostles, he raises him up to himself in the gov-
ernment of his church, he gives him his authority over the other
churches and pastors. But he does not leave Peter or his suc-
cessors to rule by arbitrary power. They must follow the con-
stitution of the church given in the Bible and in tradition, as the
president must follow the laws. Peter then and his successors ar-
under the law, which Christ gave to his church, as Christ him-
self follows the eternal principles relating to his Personality and
his nature received from his Father.
The agent has full power from the one who appoints him to do
business for him. The prime minister, the chief minister of the
congress or parliaments of kingly governments, the cabinet min-
isters at Washington have full power with their chief to bind the
subjects of the king, or the people of the whole nation. In the
same way Peter, and his heirs in his See of Rome, received from
Christ full power to bind Christ in their official acts. The official
acts of the Pope are the acts of Christ. What he binds or loosens,
Christ ratifies, binds and loosens in heaven. For in the nation,
in the kingdom, in the church, there are not many but one gov-
ernment. There is but one authority in the church, the author-
ity of Christ. But worldly governments are built on the moving
sands of politics. T'hey rise and fall, they come and go and change,
according to the changed condition of those nations, whom God
gives the power of electing their rulers. But the church of God
is as perpetual, while the human race lasts as the nature of the Deity
from whom it comes through Christ to Peter, and by him to his
successors in his everlasting See, built on the Rock of eternity,
Christ our Redeemer and our blessed Lord. " As Christ received
the fulness of power from his Father, all this he gave to Peter
and to liis successors " says St. Cyril. '
The ruler both in religion and in politics governs, not for him-
self but for the good and for the prosperity of his subjects. Christ
died not for himself but for us. He founded the church for our
salvation. He consecrated bishops, he ordained priests, he sent
them forth for the salvation of souls. He appointed Peter liead
of the Church for the union and the welfare of the church. Su-
periors in the church rule in and by the name of Christ, ever seek-
ing the salvation of immortal souls purchased by his blood. Kings
> Bib. Tbesur. quoted by St. Thomas, Opus. I. C xxxll. Suarez L. 111. de prim. Rom. PonUff
0.175.
142 THE HUMAX AND DIVINE ELEMENTS.
and presidents rule by the authority of God, for there is no au-
thority but from God, coming from him as the Creator to the peo-
ple, who elect their civil rulers, or coming from him as the Kedeem-
er into the church. But civil power rests in the people to
whom God gave the power of ruling and they delegate it to the
civil authorities, but church authority comes down direct from
God the Son to the clergy, and it does not pass through the peo-
ple. The church is the supernatual act of God working the won-
ders of the Holy Trinity in men. Therefore while politics are sub-
ject to the changes of opinions, while thrones tremble and fall,
while people throw off forms of government and establish others,
the church is eternal as God who created it, as the last and most
wonderful of his creations. From this it follows that the See of
Peter has stood the test of time. No royal house, no government
on earth can be compared to the Papacy, which stood by and saw
the birth of all the governments and nations, which goes back to
days of the apostles, and the Popes will be here at the death and
burial of every government of the earth, for it is the Rock of ages,
the Eternal See.
Christ came as God and man, his two natures being united in
the one Personality of the divine Son, the Word of God. He
founded his church having the very same double nature, compos-
ed of both human and divine elements. Christ came as the Truth
of the Father. All truth he received of the Father he gave to the
church. The truths God revealed to the human race are in the
Bible and in the traditions of Christianity and they form the ever-
lasting unchangeable constitution of the church. The Holy Spirit
ever proceeding from Christ and from the Father, ever speaks by
the mouth of Peter in the See of Rome. — There are the divine ele-
ments of the church. The human elements are the members of
the human race, the baptized laity, the ordained priesthood, the
consecrated bishops, the sublime Papac}'. But while the divine
elements of the church, the Holy Spirit and the eternal truths re-
vealed to man, remain the same, for they are either God or his
eternal truth, the human elements being formed of men, they bear
the imperfections of the creature. Men are sinful, liable to fall
away from the light which comes down from God through Jesus
Christ. We must not then be surprised to find that sometimes
the clergy fall from the church or give scandal, for "it must be
that scandal cometh " ' owing to the weakness of men. Only in
their official function do the clergy bind Christ. Every official
act of any clergyman binds Christ, for whom they act as his agents,
his ministers. In their private life their acts belong, not to Christ,
but to themselves, and if they sin they sin as private men. But
the Pope being so closely united to Christ, his faith fails not
because our Redeemer prayed for Peter, that his faith fail not.
Hence nothing so disturbs the church as an attack on the Papacy.
■ Matt, zrlli. 7.
CHRIST HAS TWO BODIES. 143
*'If the See of Peter is shaken the whole episcopacy is disturbed '*
say the ancient bishops of France." '
Such then is that supreme authority, that wonderful power of
ruling and administrating the whole constitution, which our bles-
sed Kedeemer gave to Peter, and through him to the Popes and to
the church. From the da^'s of the apostles, the whole church
obeyed him as the supreme ruler of the people of God.
By holy orders Christ ordained ministers, priests and bishops.
By that he gave tliem power over his real body. He made them
the ministers of the sacraments, for the healing of the nations,
for the salvation of souls, for the remission of sins, for the exer-
cise of his eternal Priesthood. There is the substance of a holy
power, which acts in the souls of men, spreading and scattering ta
the ends of the earth, the salvation bought by Christ upon the
cross. But each substance, each thing acts according to the laws
of its being. So the powers of holy orders, which Christ left in the
world, must act in saving men according to the church laws. The
right of administering the powers received by holy orders belongs
to jurisdiction. Then jurisdiction gives the right to exercise the
powers of holy orders over the people of God, who compose the
body of Christ his holy church.
For Christ has not only his natural body, born of his mother
Mai'y, but he has another body, born of him in death, his mystic
body, his church, formed of living stones and timbers, his christian
people, born of him by the waters of baptism and of the Holy
Ghost. The power of ruling souls is called jurisdiction. Thus
each government has supreme jurisdiction, that is the power of
making laws, of interpreting its laws and of enforcing its laws-
They are the legislative, the judicial and the executive powers or
branches of the government. Congress makes laws, the supreme
court interprets law, and the president puts them in force. Christ
gave these three elements of jurisdiction to Peter, from whom
they descended to his successors in the See of Kome. The Pope
then is the source of jurisdiction for the whole church, as the
bishop is the source of holy orders for the diocese. In him cen-
ters the legislative, the judicial, and the executive departments of
the government of the church.
The foundation of all spiritual authority in the church is the
commission given her by Christ, given direct by God by the laying
on of the hands of tlie bishop. Any bishop can ordain or conse-
crate a bishop, for one of the perfections of living beings is to
bring forth another like himself. For Christ is the'head of every
diocese, as well as he is the head of the church universal. Each
diocese then is incomplete church a spiritual state living within the
bosom of the universal church her mother. But while the source
of universal jurisdiction is the universal church, as the bishop is
the source of holy orders, the Bishop of Eome, the visible head of
the universal church, becomes the Vicar of Christ. Christ is the
> Sr. Arvit. Epis. Lab. T. IV. col. 1363.
144 PETER THE HEAD OF JURISDICTION.
head and fountain of both holy orders and of jurisdiction, the
exercise of holy orders. Therefore no bishop or pastor can exer-
cise his orders without the consent of the Pope, whom Christ ap-
pointed in the person of Peter to feed his lambs and sheep belong-
ing to his whole flock.
The agent, the Vicar, the prime minister, being one and the
same moral person with the one who appoints him, it follows that
the Pope is one and the same power with Christ. He rules the
bishops of the whole church, as the bishop governs the pastors and
priests of the diocese. Christ is the head of the diocese, and the
bishop is but the image of him, the bishop of our souls. But to
keep the church one, with one the same jurisdiction over all
the churches of the world, he chose Peter as the rock, the founda-
tion-stone on which to build that structure of eternity, that the
gates of error might not prevail against her, that he might rule
and govern her by the laws and the constitution, which at her founda-
tion he laid down. In raising a bishop, the head of holy orders,
up to be one in spiritual and supreme power with himself, Christ
crowned the episcopal order with the authority of jurisdiction over
the church, giving her the same power and authority he had received
from his Father. The Pope then is the Vicar of Christ his chief
minister. In him the church receives her crown. This is why
we give such honors to the Pope, for he is the Vicar of the Re-
deemer, and to Christ all honors belong and go back to our Eedeemer
when offered to his Vicar.
The constitution of the church is the work of Christ. For he
came not only to die for men, but also to organize his church, that
she might shower the benefits of his redemption to every son and
daughter of Adam, so that his saving graces and the benefits of his
death might save all coming generations to the end of time. The
church then takes the place of Christ, who at the resurrection finished
his work. *'Ihave finished the work which thou hast given
me to do.*' * That work he ended was the redemption of the
race, and the founding of the church. He was first the teacher
of the human race, and the church is the teacher of mankind.
As the Pope is one with Christ, so he is first the teacher of the
world in the place of our Lord, for Christ teaches by and through
him, his Vicar. Christ cannot teach error, for God can neither
deceive nor be deceived. If the Pope would teach error in his
office, as Vicar of Christ, Christ himself who would teach falsity
through his Vicar, and God would deceive the human race in the
most important things of life, the salvation of immortal souls.
Then the Lord by his Holy Spirit in the church speaks to the world
by the mouth of the chief minister of the church the Pope. That
is the infallibility of the Pope.
The Pope being the Vicar of Christ and his chief minister, it
follows that he has all the power of Christ over all the children of
God born to Christ by the waters of baptism. ** All power is given
* Jobn ZTil. 4.
PETEE IS ONE WITH CHRIST. 145
me both in heaven and on earth.'' ' '^ As the Father hath sent me so I
also send you. Going forth therefore teach ye all nations/' "com-
manding them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded
you, and behold I am with you all days even to the consummation
of the world." "
The Pope then, the Vicar of Christ has the very same power as
Christ. For the agent has the same power as the one who appoints
him. Christ having redemeed all men, it follows that he has direct
and complete authority over all christians. For this reason the
Vatican Council defined: "If any one says that the Roman Pon-
tiff has only an office of inspection, or direction, but not a full and
supreme jurisdiction over the church universal, not only in things
which belong to faith and morals, but also in things relating to
discipline, and which belong to the church scattered over all the
earth, or that he has only the larger part, but not the fulness
of this supreme power, or that this his power is not ordinary or
direct in each and every church, and over each and all the pastors
and faithful, let him be an anathema."'
It is evident that the Papacy was to last till the end of time. For
without the supremacy of the bishop of Rome over all the other
bishops and churches of the earth, the whole church would in a
few years divide and split up into many sects and churches. This
we see among those religious sects, who at different times fell
away from the church universal. For the Papacy, being one with
Christ, speaking, teaching and ruling in his name, it follows that
by and through the Bishop of Rome, the whole church derives its
whole unity power life and strength. Then all jurisdiction over
the fountains of grace and salvation comes down from him "the
Father of lights," into his Son Jesus Christ, and into his Vicar
into all the members of his mystic body the church, scattered over
all the earth. As without the head^ the body dies, so the church
visible cannot be separated from her visible head the Bishop of the
Roman diocese.
Christ first founded the church universal in the persons of
Peter, the apostles, the priests and the ministers he ordained.
To the apostles as the first bishops he gave the constitution of the
church, the fundamental principles of faith, the primary truths
of the christian religion. Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit,
these fundamental doctrines have developed into the vast organi-
zation of the church, which astonishes all men who study her
constitution. Christ consecrated the apostles universal bishops of
the universal church, appointing them to no particular cities.
To St. James, first bishop of Jerusalem, the apostles fix the title
of his see, when they gave him the care of the church at Jerusa-
lem." Then the apostles were at first missionary bishops. Peter
chose Rome as his See, the seat of his labors. When the other
apostles died, their universal apostolate died with them, as St.
» Matt, xxviii. 18. 2 jjatt. xxviil. 19,20. » Vatican Council, Sess. Iv. Caput. 111.
* Butler's lives of the Saints, St James.
146 THK POPE THE HEIR OF PETER.
James excepted, they had no titular episcopal sees. But the su-
preme apostolate of Peter remained in the Roman diocese. It
devolved on his successor, and lives in him to this day. That it
why it is called the Apostolic See. Then Peter and' James ex-
cepted, the apostles had no fixed sees or episcopal cities and titles.
When a bishop without a title dies at the present time, his authority
falls back into the universal church to which he belonged, while
when a bishop dies, who has the title to an episcopal see, his suc-
cessor in that see becomes his heir to all the spiritual authority he
As the family honors and the wealth of the husband at death
belong to his wife and family, so the spiritual riches of the bishop
remain in his church his diocese, of he has the title, or when he
has no diocese, they go back from whence they came to the church
universal, to which Avhile living he belonged. The successor then
of the bishop consecrated to a see, acquires all the honors, digni-
ties, jurisdiction and power attached to the see over which he pre-
sides, unless the Holy See otherwise disposes, for they are local,
attached to the see, and not personal, belonging only to and dy-
ing with the bishop. Thus the bishop consecrated to an archi-
episcopal see, by that becomes an archbishop, with authority over
the bishops and churches in the province, over which the jurisdic-
tion of the archidiocese extends. From this it follows that the
clergyman elected to the See of Rome, at that moment receives
direct from God universal authority and jurisdiction over all the
churches of the earth. For he is the heir and the successor of
Peter, whom Christ made his Vicar to " feed his lambs." to '* feed
his sheep." By his union with the Roman diocese Peter made
her one with himself. There he labored and there he died, that
there might be no dispute about his heir and successor. These
principles were so well known by the apostolic men, that there was
no disputes in the early church about the successor of Peter the
Fisherman. They all looked to the Roman Bishops as the suc-
cessors of Peter.
Here we see the deep designs of God, who reigns in history.
The guiding Providence of the Almighty is with the great move-
ments of the human race, but his designs do not at first appear to
the eyes of men. He chose Abraham to be the father of those
who believed, that the first revelation given to Adam might not
be lost to the world, but that it might be preserved by the Jews.
He selected Moses, that the Israelites might not be lost among the
pagan nations. The functions of the priesthood he gave to the
tribe of Levi, and the government of his people to the family of
David for 300 years, while the members of the family of Aaron
were the high priests of the Old Law. Jesus Christ was born of
these. The blood of Abraham, of Moses, of I^evi, of Aaron and of
David flowed in his veins, for he was to be the Prophet Priest and
King over all the members of his church, the Kingdom of God.
In the same manner the light of ancient civilization first rose over
ROME MISTEESS OF PAGANISM. 147
Egypt, because of the children of Israel, who dwelled within its
confines. The empire of Babylon lived to preserve the records of
the captive Jews. The empire of Alexander spread over
Greece, Egypt, Syria, Palestine and Mesopotamia, to scatter the
Greek language and spread the Bible into pagan nations, for the
preaching of the apostles who preached and wrote in Greek.
Following the same providential designs, with a mighty hand
the Lord God had beforehand prepared the foundations of the
•city, which was to be the seat of the Papacy. When the finger
of God shaped the shores of the continents, he dug the deep
channel of the Mediterranean Sea between Europe and Africa,
so as to give free access to the very heart of the old continent,
while by an upheaval of a geological era, the Italian continent rose
from the bosom of the deep giving free access on every side.
'•Between the Tyrehenean Sea and the dark summits of the Ap-
pennine mountains, a handful of brigands had built their cabins
around the hills. In digging the first foundations for their ram-
parts, they found a bloody head, and the oracle declared that the
city would become the head of the world.'" Such was the begin-
ning of the foundations of Eome, a city which, with the glories of
her sons, fills history, and attains the highest eminence in the
christian civilization. Eome the city of the seven hills grew
and conquered all her enemies. She sent her valiant soldiers to
every clime, and victory after victory crowned their wonderful
discipline. At first a republic, it was later changed into an em-
pire. At the time of Christ, tlie Roman empire had spread from
the frozen regions of the north, to the burning sands of Africa,
and from the Straits of Gibralter to the rivers of India. The
Eoman soldiers had overrun the world and brought nearly every
nation of the earth, bowed and suppliant to the feet of the Cassars.
The worship of every false god, the peculiar religious ceremonial
of every pagan nation came with conquered kings and peoples,
chained to the chariot of the victorious Eoman generals, till
Eome became the seat of the worship of every superstitious race.
The wealth of empires, the learning of Greece, the civilization of
Egypt, the traditions of India, the pagan might and power of the
«arth came to Eome with her victorious armies. -At the preach-
ing of the apostles, Eome was the heart of the universe, pulsating
with the very life of the ancient world.
But the Providence of God had prepared her for a still higher
and a nobler destiny, and the city of the seven hills, the mistress
of the world, was to receive a power, of which her former great-
ness was but the shadow. Christ took Peter, a poor ignorant and
uncultured fisherman of Galilee, made him his Vicar on earth,
gave him his power, the Keys of his mighty spiritual kingdom,
and sent him forth as the Father in heaven had sent him. Fear
not Peter the Lord is with thee. Thou and thy heirs shall save
Eome from the fate of Babylon and of the mighty empires, which
1 Lacordalre, Conferences on the Church, 4. con. 8.
148 AV AS PETER BISHOP OF ANTIOCH?
have fallen. By you Rome will become the eternal city. Why did
not Peter set up his imperial Chair at Jerusalem, the capital of
Judea? From the words of Christ, from the prophecies of the
Old Testament, by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, Peter knew
that the Jews were rejected for crucifying their God, and that
like Cain they were to wander over the earth till the end of time
with the blood of their brother Christ upon them. Knowing the
calling of the gentiles, Peter turned towards Rome, that in the
city of idolatry he might destroy the pagan religions there
enthroned. Peter was filled with the Holy Ghost, and he came
to the imperial city and there he fixed his See. Because of the
Jewish religion, and because of the life and death of Christ, Jer-
usalem is called the " Mother of Churches." It was the first
diocese erected in the world. Like a wise and careful general grad-
ually advancing on the breastworks of the enemy, St. Peter ad-
vanced carefully on Rome the Mistress of the world. He stopped for
seven years at Antioch, to survey from afar the seat of his empire,
the See of Rome, the mother diocese of the christian world. Yearly
the Church celebrates the Feast of " The Chair of Peter at Antioch."
But was Peter ever the real titular bishop of Antioch, as he
was of Rome. We think not. An old tradition of the Greeks of
Asia Minor says, that the Lord appeared to Peter in the night and
said: "Arise Peter and take possession of the West. It wants
thee. Show them the light of thy face, and I will be with thee."'
St. Gregory says he never sat as bishop of Antioch, but that he
stopped at the latter city only for a time, on his famous journey to
Rome. * Pope Innocent holds that he only lived there tempor-
arily, that it was only his residence, that he never assumed the
episcopal title of that city, no more than he took the title of Jeru-
salem, where he also lived for some years during his first apos-
tolate, and that his title was only completed at Rome.'
For some years before their final separation, the apostles made
Jerusalem their home. According to St. Leo, when they began
their labors, they divided the whole known world, giving each one
his part. Some authors say our Lord gave the church at Jerusa-
lem into the care of St. James. His was the first episcopal title
and the model of all the others. Then the episcopal titles were
established by the Redeemer himself.
Peter lived for seven years at Antioch, overseeing all the other
churches of Asia. There he established the first Archiepiscopal
See. Before he left for Rome he consecrated his beloved disciple
Evodius bishop of Antioch giving him charge of the churches of
Asia. But Peter, so say the best writers, was never the titular
bishop of Antioch. He was still a missionary bishop, waiting till
Providence prepared the way for him to take possession of his own
See of Rome. We must understand that the Pope can be at the
same time the Bishop of Rome, and rule other dioceses, for he is
■ Apud Boland T. xxvii. p. 877. * L. vii. Epi«t. xl. ad EulOR.
^ I. Epist xxiv. ad Alex. Antiocb.
STS. PETER AND PAUL. 149
the Vicar of Christ, with universal jurisdiction. Thus Pope Leo
IX. was Bishop of Rome, and at the same time ruled the diocese of
Toul, and for seventy years the Popes lived at Avignon as bishops
of the latter place yet being at the same time Bishops of Eome.
To better understand the nature of the Papacy, we must remem-
ber that Christ has supreme and direct authority over all the mem-
bers of the church. The Pope being his Vicar, he has the same
authority as Christ himself. Therefore the Pope is the supreme
Bishop over the whole world as the Vatican Council declares. *
Peter exercised direct episcopal functions at Jerusalem, at Antioch
at Joppa and at other places, as seen in the Acts. He presided
at the council of Jerusalem. He chose an apostle in the place of
Judas. He ordained the deacons. He condemned Ananias and
Saphira. He did all that without trampling on the rights of
James, the bishop of Jerusalem. '' After the ascension of our
Lord, he held the priestly chair for four years, then he came to
Antioch after having overcome Simon Magus at Samaria, then at
Antioch he erected his pontifical Chair, which he held for seven
years, at the end of which time he came to Rome, and worthily he
presided over the Roman church for twenty-five years, seven
months and eight days." "*
It was customary in these times to write on the dyptics, or
official Records, the names of those who founded the church, besides
the names of the different pastors or bishops of the see. In that
way St. Peter was called bishop on the dyptics of the church he
founded at Antioch, although St. Evodius was its first titular bishop.
In our day we say that both Sts. Peter and Paul were the
founders of the church of Rome, although only Peter was the first
bishop of Rome, while St. Paul was only a missionary bishop of the
Jews and Gentiles, and he never had an episcopal title. Yet by
his preaching, he founded many churches. No diocese or church
can have more than one bishop or pastor, for no body can have
more than one head. Although Sts. Peter and Paul are said to
have founded the Church at Rome, yet only Peter was the Bishop
of that great city. Like the other apostles, at their consecration
by Christ, the whole world was the diocese of St. Paul the apostle
of the Gentiles.
Although St. James the less, became the first bishop of Jerusa-
lem, yet for fourteen years the other apostles made the holy city
their home, when resting from their labors on the missions among
the Gentiles. Thus St. John lived at Ephesus, but he was not the
bishop of that city. St. Paul consecrated Timothy bishop of Ephe-
sus, and Titus bishop of Crete. When St. Paul was arrested at
Jerusalem, because he was a Roman citizen he appealed to
Caesar ''Whose faith is spoken of in the whole world"' because
of St. Peter the Roman church was the mistress of all churches.
St. Paul expressly says, that he was not sent to administer the
1 Const. Pastor ^ternus. ' Acta S. Gudillse Bolland. ad diem 22 Feb. * I. Rom. vlU.
150 ST. MARK AND EXODIUS, FIRST ARCHBISHOPS.
sacraments to the people of any particular diocese, but to be a
missionary bishop, "For Christ sent me not to baptize but to
preach the Gospel," ' because one bishop cannot be the bishop of
a diocese belonging to another. Therefore St. Paul says " I have
so preached this Gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should
build on another man's foundation, .... but now having no more
place in these countries.""
The foundations of the Roman diocese had already been laid by
St. Peter, and St. Paul could not sit on the episcopal throne of
another bishop, *'on another man's foundation."' But the
apostle of the Gentiles came to Rome to sanctify it with his pres-
ence, to consecrate the Roman church with his martyrdom and
with his tomb. He was the greatest missionary bishop of the
churches, he brought the gifts of the Holy Spirit and the fruit of his
vast labors to Rome, and there with the Pnmacy of Peter, there they
rest with his hallowed bones under the great St. Peter's church.
Eusepius, the most ancient church historian says that Christ him-
self told Sts. Peter and Paul to remain twelve years in Judea, to
give the Jews a chance of embracing Christianity and after that he
told them to preach to the whole world.*
Peter then with the other apostles established the diocese of
Jerusalem, with James at its head. He did that for the conver-
sion of the Jews to whom the Kingdom of God was first to be
preached. Then he left for Antioch the chief city of Asia, where
he founded the first seat of an archbishop. He also sent St. Mark
his beloved disciple to Alexandria the chief or metropolitan see of
Africa. When that was done he started for Rome. ''The Mis-
tress of the Gentiles," that in her thecentre of the pagan world, he
might establish the centre and seat of his spiritual empire, "Thus
St. Peter brought to Rome, the prerogative of his faith and the au-
thority of his discipline."* To Rome therefore Peter brought all
the machinery of the central government of the church universal.
He made the Roman church his spiritual spouse. There under
that monster of cruelty Nero, he died. The central government re-
mains to this day with his successor the Father of bishops. "The
bishop therefore is called in worthy subordination to him, the
Prelate, who is the heir of the place and of the teachings of Peter,
and is worthily the origin and foundations of unity, ... .no one is
allowed to raise a teaching chair against him."'
The new Pontiff receives direct from Christ his authority as
Pope. But we must see in the next chapter the workings of the
authority given by Christ to Peter and his successors.
« I. Cor. I. 17. « Rom. xw. 20, 2S. » Rom. xv. 30.
* Eusep Htst. V. 18. * Bossuet Lit It. a une Dam. de Metz.
* III. CouDcIl of Baltimore Cap. I. do. II.
tHE fundamental constitu-
tion of a nation is not so
much the written instru-
ment, as their customs,
their manners, their education,
and their forms of social every-
day life. If their constitution
and their government be the ex-
pression of the genius and man-
ners of the whole people, they
will be happy, prosperous and
contented, for it fits them,
whereas if the government comes
not from them, as the expression
of their deep-seated customs and
manners, but forced on them by
conquest, they will be rebellious,
restless and unhappy.
Like the constitutions of most
of the European nations, the
divine constitution of the church is not a written instrument like
that of the United States. For our dear Lord wrote it not. He
taught it to his followers from whom it comes down to us for he
wished to show all men that the church he founded to take his
place was to be a living teacher of the human race, and not a
dead book, like the Bible, for all men to take any meaning
they liked from its sacred pages. The apostles went forth as
the teachers and spiritual rulers of the nations they converted.
They impressed the constitution of the universal church on every
church they founded, and each convert they taught the fundamental
doctrines they had heard from their divine Master. Hence we find
that every one of the churches founded by the apostles, had the
very same fundamental doctrines although they differed in litur-
gies and modes of discipline.
Jesus Christ founded his church therefore as a most perfect
151
"*^^
A PUBLIC RECEPTION AT THE VATICAN IN THE PAULINE (HA PEL.
LEGISLATIVE, JUDICIAL AND EXECUTIVE POWERS. 153
spiritual government over the souls of men. Living in the world
till the end of time, saving all the generations of mankind, a per-
fect government with the three functions of making, of interpret-
ing and of executing its own laws and statutes, the church must
have a visible head to enforce and execute her spiritual laws. In
our own beloved country, congress makes laws, the supreme court
interprets tliem, and the j^resident puts them in force for the
whole nation, while different states into which this nation is divi-
ded has also these three functions in their legislatures, their
courts, and their governors.
But Christ, the wisest statesman who ever walked this earth
knew, that the bishops of the whole world, scattered throughout
all nations and countries governing their dioceses, he knew they
could not gather each year in congress or council to make laws
for the whole church, because they would be taken up with the
internal administration of their own dioceses. Yet he did not
appoint a few learned bishops to form a supreme court to pass
judgment on disputed points, for the church has one not many
heads and that one head is the Pope his Vicar. He did not
found the constitution of the church so the Pope would be elected
by the people, for that would have been impracticable. We know
how popular elections excite the people, dividing them into hostile
parties, and in our day few nations are so trained and educated as
to carry out an election without great disturbances.
The foundations of the church were laid deep on principles of
wonderful wisdom by the Divine Wisdom himself, who established
another way to frame her laws, to interpret her constitution and
to execute her discipline. As a wise statesman, our blessed Lord
united these triple functions of government in one man, Peter
and his successors in the See of Kome. For the church to remain
one and undivided, it was necessary to unite all functions of the spir-
itual government of the church in one ruler, the Vicar of Christ,
whose decisions are the same as those of Christ, for he and
Christ make one and the same government of the whole church.
A congress or a parliament meets each year to change the laws
which do not suit, or to make others to take their place, for rul-
ers, politicians and statesman are only trying to find a way of
governing mankind who lost their first ruler Adam, and the
mind and will of man still remain weakened by his sin. Civil govern-
ments then change, for they are only trying to take the place of Ad-
am and rule his children fallen from the supernatural state. But a
congress of the bishops of the whole church meets but seldom. It is
called an ecumenical council.' It is a congress of the whole
church, which meets, not for the changing of the constitution of
the church, which made by Christ no power on earth can change,
but to receive from the successor of St. Peter the rules he makes,
and the laws he enacts for the better government of the universal
church. Then while the council under its head may legislate for
1 The Greek for the whole earth.
154 WHY ALL THE APOSTLES DID NOT WKIIE.
tlie cliurch, yet they cannot cliange the fundamental principles of
her divine constitution, which God revealed. Even the congress
of this country cannot change the constitution, for that was made
by the wliole people, and they the sovereign nation alone can
change it.
When the supreme court of this country defines an article of
the constitution, or interprets one of its principles, all take it as an
oracle of human wisdom. When the highest court of the queen's
bench of judges defines an article of the British constitution, al-
though their constitution is not a written instrument, but written
in the customs and manners of the English people, all take it as
a truth. So we must look for the constitution of the church in
the teachings of God, in the Holy Bible, in the writings of the
early fathers, in the great councils of the church. By them the Holy
Ghost spoke, as before he spoke to the Jews by the prophets.
Let us see what the Fathers and the councils say about Peter and
his successors the Roman Pontiffs.
The apostles being the universal bishops of the universal church,
travelling into various nations, founding churches, arguing with
the pagans, combatting errors, instructing the people, they found
no time to write. Their apostolic labors for the spread of the
faith left took up all their time. They left that duty of writing
to their followers. Sts. Matthew and John only wrote Gospels,
and they did it for peculiar reasons, while Sts. Mark and Luke
disciples of Sts. Peter and Paul, wrote the other two Gospels.
But the converts of the apostles, especially those educated in the
famous schools of Judea, of Egypt, of Gre.ece, of Rome etc., were
educated men, and they wrote the teachings of Christ, which they
received from the hallowed lips of the apostles. These holy men
gathered up the traditions and the teachings of the apostles.
They wrote the doctrines of the church. To them we must look
for the belief of the early church regarding its fundamental con-
stitution. Their writings have ever been received as the teach-
ings of the Christ. In every age they received the honor due
to the word of God. No christian church refused to bow before
them, as the exponents of the early church. In their writings we
will find the constitution of the church. They are called the
fathers of the church. Let us see what these apostolic men say
about the apostolic Chair of Peter.
Before leaving the earth Christ promised to send upon the apos-
tles the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of truth, who would to teach them
all things and to abide with them forever. ' The Holy Spirit
speaks through and by the councils of the bishops. The entire
episcopacy and great churchmen of the world meet in these coun-
cils, and they aie free to vote as they wish. If at any time they
believe that the bishop of Rome were not the teacher of the
world, or that the whole body of the bishops is infallible, they
would have declared it in one of the councils. But that they
> John x\1. 18.
PETER LEAVING ANTIOCH. 155
never did. They ever proclaimed that the Roman Pontiff alone
was the mouthpiece of the Holy Spirit. Not only that, but by
their oath of office, they were obliged in conscience and under
pain of a great sin to resist any encroachments of any bishop or of
the bishop of Rome over them. This encroachment of the Pope
is not found in the records of the councils or in the writings of any
age.
Men cling to power. No body of men are so jealous of their
power as a branch of government. No bishop ever obtained
power over another bishop, which did not come from his office, for
the bishop is always bound to guard his rights of office. The
Bishop of Rome could never have got power over other bishops un-
less it were given by Christ. In the early ages no council was ever
held as valid unless called by the Bishop of Rome. The Acts of
these councils were never binding till confirmed by the Holy See.
Leaving Antioch in the year 42 where during his seven years
residence he had established a flourishing church, where the fol-
lowers of Christ were first called Christians, St. Peter started on
his journey to take possession of the eternal See of Rome. During
the years he lived at Antioch, his most devoted disciples were Sts.
Evodius and Ignatius, one a Jew the other a gentile, and to Evo-
dius he gave charge of Jewish converts, while he placed Ignatius
over the gentiles.' Some authors say that Evodius succeeded him,
and that the great martyr Ignatius sat the second after Peter on
the patriarchal see of Antioch. But history is dim relating to the
details of Peter's administration of the church at Antioch, as his
long administration of the church at Rome overshadows his short-
er reign at the Asiatic city of culture. Of the exact time when
he appointed his beloved disciple and Evangelist St. Mark, as su-
pervising bishop of the churches of Egypt, with his see at Alexan-
dria, history is silent. We only know that St. Mark came there, that
he converted many of the Egyptians, that he bore with him the
authority of Peter, and that there he died a glorious death for the
faith.'
At the time of which we write, St. John the Evangelist
lived at Ephesus, with jurisdiction over the churches of Asia
Minor. To Ephesus St. Paul had sent his disciple Timothy, the
first titular bishop of that famous city. St. John never became the
titular bishop of any particular city, because Christ had established
the apostles as universal bishops of his universal church, not
giving them titles of any particular city or diocese, if we except
St. James, whom some writers say our beloved Lord told the day
of the ascension to look after the christians of Jerusalem.* Then
only Sts. Peter and James became titular bishops of particular
churches, for being teachers of the infant church already in their
lives spread to all the ends of the earth, the other apostles had to
travel from place to place, superintending and overseeing the
• Eusebius Hist. L. 3 C. 22, 36 Am. Cyclopedia St. Ignatius Baronlu? Butler's lives of the
Saints Feb. Isl Note&c.
^ Butler's Lives of the Saints. &c. ' Butler's Lives of the Saints. St. James.
156 THE BOOK HERMAS WROTE.
other bishops, everywhere preaching, regulating discipline, found-
ing liturgies and modes of worship, correcting abuses and seeing
that the sacraments were administered to the people.
No fact of history stands out so powerfully or can be so brilliant-
ly proved as the supremacy of the See of Peter in the early
church. Every church looked to Eome for light and government,
knowing that to her first bishop, Peter, the Lord said : ''Feed my
lambs Feed my sheep ." Numberless facts of history, countless
passages of the early writers show us that supreme and universal
Pastorate or Primacy of Peter extending over the whole church,
and no church, diocese or congregation was free or independent of
the See of Rome. No fact of history stands, nor can we prove so well,
as that Peter came to Rome, that there fixed his See, and that
there he died. If we deny that Peter ever came to Rome, we must
reject all history, all facts which come to us by the testimony of
the generations who have gone before us, we must believe only
what we see ourselves, and the human race has no knowledge of
the past. Let us see what history tells us of the Primacy of the
See of Rome in the early church.
When Hernias a disciple of St. Paul wrote a book which he called
"The Pastor," he tells us himself that he was obliged to send it for
examination to Clement Bishop of Rome, as the writer must send
this book to Very Rev. Father Gabriels, whom the bishop of
Syracuse had appointed to examine it, to see that there be nothing
in it contrary to the teachings of the church. St. Clement Bishop
of Rome had succeeded St. Cletus, who had succeeded St. Linus,
who had followed St. Peter as Bishop of the eternal city. Hernias
had written that book in the year 90 or 91, when St. John still lived
the last of the apostles taught by our blessed Lord himself, whose
learning had given him the title of the Theologian, whose sublime
Gospel was then read in nearly every church. St John was then
living at Ephesus the last of the apostolic college. Why was not
Hermas obliged to send his book to St. John, who had heard the
doctrines of God from the lips of our blessed Lord himself, in place
of sending his composition to Clement, the third after St. Peter,
if the whole Christian church did not look, not to St. John, but
to the heir of Peter as the teacher of the faith and the morals of
the early church?
St. Ignatius, converted by Peter himself, taught by St. John the
Evangelist, says: "The teachings of the Sucessorsof Peter are au-
thoritative: " ' Born in the year 82 at Smyrna, of which city he later
became bishop, St. Polycarp was long the disciple of St. John
the Evangelist. In the year 167, he went to Rome, to ask Pope
Anacletus what he would do regarding the celebration of Easter
for while living at Ephesus, St. John had given the christian
converts leave to celebrate Easter on the same day the Jews cele-
brated their Passover, while the Romans, taught by St. Peter,
held the feast of the resurrection on the first Sunday, following the
^ St. Ignatius Martyr " Quae decendo pnecipistfs " &c.
IRENEUS, TERTULLIAN, OEIGIK, &C. 157
full moon after the vernal equinox. According to the teachings
of St. John, the christians of Palestine, of Syria, of Egypt, of
Africa and of parts of Europe, held the festival on the same day
as the Jews, and there was a division in the early church. Why
did one of the oldest bishops of the church, one who was for long
years a disciple of St. John, why did he undertake such a danger-
ous and difficult journey to the throne of Peter, to sit at the feet
of Peter's heir and there to learn wisdom at its fountain head, if
it was not well known that all the bishops and churches of that
time know that they must be taught by the successor of Peter?
St. Ireneus born, in the year 135, a disciple of St. Polycarp writes
at least according to the sense of his words: ''All the churches
must depend on the church of Kome as their source and head ....
The higher Principality of the Eoman church exists because of the
supremacy of Peter, which is of apostolic tradition. By it we eas-
ily beat the malice of those, who either by pride or bad faith, preach
new doctrine."' This father came from the East to France and be-
came the Bishop of Lyons. In the year 177 he was sent by the
churches of Lyons and Vienna to Rome to consult Pope Eleuther-
ius on church doctrines.
Tertullian born at Carthage in 150 calls the church of Rome :
''The blessed church, which the Princes of the apostles Peter and
Paul, sealed with their blood, from which all authority comes
forth."* He says about an edict in another place: " I learn that
a very peremptory decree has been issued. The Sovereign PontifE,^
the Bishop of bishops declares," &c. '
In the beginning of this century St. Hippolytus, offering his
head to the executioner said: " We are bound to profess that faith
which is guarded by the Chair of Peter."*
Origin the great writer of the early church, born at Alexandria
in the year 185, and who with Tertullian was one of the mightiest
genius of the early christian ages says: "Consider what must be
the power and authority of Peter, the living rock upon which the
church was built, and whose decisions have as much force and va-
lidity as oracles coming from the very mouth of Christ himself."*
St. Cyprian, the great bishop of Carthage in 254 writing to Pope
Cornelius says: "All heresies and schisms have sprung from a
disregard for the one Priest and Judge, to whom Christ delegated
his power. For, if according to the intention of our Lord, every
one would obey in the church, no one could divide the church."*
" They dare come to the Chair of Peter, not thinking that they
are Romans among whom no errors can come." ' " One God one
Christ and one church founded by our Lord on Peter." * " You
wish me to send your letter to Cornelius " he writes to Anthoney
' ' because you want to satisfy his Holiness that you are one with him
and with the Catholic Church." *
St. Athanatius in 373 writes to Pope Felix II: "You are the
> Irea5us Lib. IH. Advers. Haeres. ^ ^rsss. C. 27. » Lib. De Pud.
* Martyr. Romau. ' Orijr. Oaten. » Epist. Iv. ad Corn. Ponst.
^ On Novatians &c. * Epist. xlylii. xlix. ' Epist. xliii.
158 BAZIL, JEROME, AUGUSTINE AND OTHERS.
nprooter of heresies, which destroy the church, you are the teacher
and prince of sound doctrine and unspotted faith." '
When the bishops of Egypt assembled in council, they sent a
letter of felicitation to Pope Felix II. They acknowledged that
he was the immovable foundation placed by Christ, upon which
the whole church rested. When the terrible Arian heresy broke
out in the IV. century denying the divinity of Christ, all the church-
es looked to the Chair of Peter for assistance. Against th'at Rock
of Peter was directed all the hatred of these heresiarchs, who de-
nied the divinity of Christ.
When the great St. Bazil wrote to Pope Damasus in 378 he said :
** To your Holiness is given to tell the spurious and adulterated
from the pure and orthodox belief, and to teach without adulter-
ation the faith of our forefathers There is no one but your
Holiness to whom we can turn for help."'
Optatus bishop of Melevi in 390 wrote: " Thou knowest, and
thou darest not den}^ that at Rome, Peter established the epis-
copal Chair, Avhicli he was the first to occupy."'
The great bishop of Milan St. Ambrose writing to Pope Siric-
ius in 397 says: " In the pastorals of your Holiness, we see the
■care of the Shepherd, who watches the entrance of the sheep-fold,"
•etc. In one of his sermons he says: " Where Peter is there is
the church." * *' Peter is the immovable Rock, which supports the
whole superstructure of Christianity."' Again he says that the
*' Roman church may be sometimes tempted but never changed. "
The forcible words of St. Epiphaniusat the end of the fourth
century and of St. Chrystom, archbishop of Constantinople at the
beginning of the fifth century, acknowledging the supremacy of
the Papacy, form some of the most eloquent expressions of these two
famous doctors of the early church. * St. Jerome called the great-
est expounder of the Bible wrote to Pope Damasus: " I hold fast
to the Chair of Peter, upon whom the church is built. Decide as
you please. If you order, I shall not hesitate in my belief in three
hypostaces." ' " If any one is firm in his allegiance to the Chair of
Peter,he is of my mind, for I hold with the successor of the fish-
erman."* '* The Roman Church cannot hold error, even if an
angel should come to teach it." *
St. Augustine teaches in the strongest terms the supremacy of
the Chair of Peter. We can find space for only a few of the most
striking of the passages in his works. Writing against the Dona-
tists, he says: ^' Count all the High Priests who followed each other
in that holy line, every one of them is that Rock against which the
gates of hell shall not prevail."" He answers the Pelagians by
telling them that two councils had referred a certain matter to the
Holy See, which decided the dispute. "Rome " he says "has spoken,
the case is settled." " Again he said: " By the letters of Inno-
' Eplst. Syn. ad Felecem II. * Eplst. 71, 74, 77. » Coutra Parnem.
• Sermon xlvll. • Lib U de Fide ad Gratlan.
• Hoiii. 11. in Acta Anost. Horn, a* In Math. xl. &c. ' Three Persons In God.
• St. Jerome In year 420. » Conra RuQnus. •* In Ps Contra DonaUsts.
" In Sermo de Verb. Apost
WRITEKS OF THE EA.RLY CHURCH. 159.
cent all doubt on this question has been removed."' Writing
against Julian he says: "Why do you ask for an examination,
since it has already been made by the Apostolic See?"* In a let-
ter he says: "The old catholic faith gets so much strength and
support from the words of the Apostolic See, that it is sinful to
have any doubts about it." ' " In the Catholic church I adhere to
the Chair of Peter, because the Lord gave him the care of the
faithful, and because his authority has come down through an un-
interrupted line of successors to our time. Again the divine
Shepherd said: " My sheep hear my voice and follow me." This
voice speaks to me in the clearest manner from Rome. Whoever
does not wish to stray from the true fold, must follow this voice."*
No man ever born of the human race uninspired was endowed with
greater natural talents and abilities than St. Augustine. Up to
his time, he was the most learned man the world produced, yet
when the Pope spoke he humbly bent his gigantic genius before
that divine oracle.
Two members of the religious community, which he established
at Hippo, were Prosper and Fulgentius, whom for many years he
had taught and instructed in the true faith while members of his
household. The former writes: " Rome the See of Peter was made
the head of the world in pastoral honor, whatever she does not
capture by war she holds by religion. " * Prosper writes to Pope
Zosimus saying: " to add force to your decision and with the right
hand of Peter strike to the detruncation of the wicked for he
strengthens all bishops." ' In another place he says: "Let not
your courage fail, have recourse to Rome, the Mother of the true
faith. What Rome believes, all Christianity believes." '
Maximian, Patriarch of Constantinople in the same age writes:
" From the fartherest ends of the world, the confessors of the
true faith look up to Peter as to the sun. God has raised him to
the teacher's chair, with the right of holding it forever; who
wishes to know anything deep must run to this oracle of doc-
trine." '
In 444 St Cyril bishop of Jerusalem writing to Pope Celestine
about his relations with the impious Nestorius says: " As
members of the mystical body of the church, it behooves us to
follow our head, the Roman Pontiff, who holds in trust the
deposit of the apostolic faith. From him we are to learn, what
we are bound to believe think and hold."' "We venerate and
consult the Bishop of Rome before all others, because he alone is
to reprimand, to correct, to command, to dispense, to bind and
loose in the place of Him who made him, and no others have full
power but he (Christ) gave it to him alone, to whom by divine
right all bend the head, and the prelates of the earth obey him
as Jesus Christ."'"
1 Lit li. C. 3. Con 2 Ep. Pelag. * Lib. 11. Adv. Julian. " Letter 157.
* De Unltate Eccl. C. xil. * Carmen de Ingrat. • Contra Collatorem.
^ Fulgentius C. I. X. xli. * Eplst. ad Orieutales. * Hard vlU.
*" Lib. Thausurus.
160 TESTIMONY OF THE ELDERS.
In the year 450 St. Peter Chrysologus wrote to the heretic Euty-
ches who denied that Christ has two natures which error he taught
the 300 monks under him; " We ask you to hear especially the
decision of the Pope at Rome^ with all readiness in his final sen-
tence, because the Blessed Peter, who lives and governs in his
own See, gives to those who consult him the truth of faith/^'
About the same time Socrates, a Greek, wrote: " Without the
Bishop of Rome nothing of importance can be done in the church
of God."' About the same age another Greek Father wrote:
" Whatever is done without the approval of the Roman Bishop is
null and void.'''
When the great writer Theodoret in 460 as bishop of Cyprus
was deposed by the local Synod at Ephesus, he appealed to the
Holy See against the unjust decision of the prelate who assembled
and condemned him at the Command of the emperor. At once he
wrote to the Pope, in these words: " If Paul a preacher of truth ran
to the great Peter, regarding those who were fighting at Antioch,
that he might solve the difficulty, how much more do we appeal
to your apostolic See? " While his case was under consideration
at Rome, he asked Cardinal Renatus to urge the Pope to decide
the trouble and restore him to his See, of which he had been
so unjustly deprived. He says: 'Tor the See of Rome has the
headship and the direction of all the churches throughout the
world, and that for many reasons, but especially because she has
been ever free from heretical wounds, nor has any one ever taught
contrary to the faith of him who sat in her Chair."
This doctrine was so perfectly engrafted into the early
christians, that it is found in the mass books of the early ages.
When the bishops of Spain met in a plenary council at Tarragon
in the year 465 they wrote to Pope Hilary: " We rely on that
faith, whose praise was in the mouth of the apostle, we are seek-
ing for an answer from that See, where there is no error because
presided over by Pontifical thought."
About the same year St. Avitus writing in the name of all the
bishops of France to the Roman clergy in relation to the election
of Pope Symraach says: "When any doubt occurs about a Papal
election, not one bishop but the whole hierarchy appears to be
wavering." In another letter he says: " When any differences
arise in church matters, it is our duty to abide by the decisions
of the Sovereign Pontiff, as members following our head." " The
truth is known to me inasmuch as the Pontiff of the Roman
City, by the privilege of his authority is pleased to reply to those
who ask him." * We have given but a small part of the writings
of the early Fathers from the days of the apostles to the end of
the fifth century. According to the testimony of all christians,
the pure doctrines of Christ flourished in all their vigor during
the first five centuries.
> Eplst. af Eutyh. Inter. Ecta Concll Ephes. » Socrat. II. 15 17 & Iv. 87.
* Sozomenus ill. 8, 0, &c. vl. 89. < See Gall. zi. p. 746.
IN THE SIXTH CENTURY. 161
In the beginning of the sixth century St. Pocessor a bishop of
Africa thus addressed the bishop of Rome: " Whom can we ask with
greater stability of faith, than the one who presides in his See,
whose first Rector heard from Christ: " Thou art Peter and upon
this rock I will build my church."
About this time Ferandus, the learned archdeacon of Carthage
in 505 wrote to a clergyman of Constantinople: "We are ready
to learn and not to teach. If you are anxious to know the truth
you must address the head of the Apostolic See. Rome is the head
of the world."
Stephen archbishop of Larissa was badly treated and imprisoned
by Epiphanius, patriarch of Constantinople, and sent Theodosius,
one of his suffragan bishops with a letter appealing to the Pope say-
ing i " No ecclesiastical rank can exceed the authority given you by
the Saviour and first Pastor of all." Still unmoved by the popular
cry, Stephen who wrote the above, faced all opposition, because he
appealed to the Pope saying: " In the confession of whose church
all the churches of the world rest."
Such was also the faith of the catholics of the early African church
as shown by the writings of Facundus Hermi.* The belief of the
British Isles appears by the writings of Gildas in 570 and the
other early Saxon writers." In the year 515 the celebrated St. Co-
lurabanus asked the Pope to settle the disputed question about the
time of celebrating Easter. After referring to the traditions of
the Scotch and Irish churches relating to the matter he added:
"It is not our place, nor does it belong to our rank to question
your great authority, which would be ridiculous, for you legiti-
mately sit in the chair of Peter, who holds the keys. My western
friends ask about the Easter" &c.^ At another time, when a dif-
ficulty arose relating to the Three Chapters, he wrote: " I told
the Irish that the Roman See would never give its support to any
one who held heretical doctrines. For to Thee belongs the danger
of the whole army of the Lord. Thee only they except because you
have the power of regulating all." . . ."We have no hope except in
the power you have inherited from St. Peter.". . . "Though Rome
is great and well known, by this Chair alone it is great and cele-
brated among us.". . ."Never did the Caesars place their imperial
standards on the shores of Ireland, but your Holiness reigns over the
islands of the sea, as well as in your capital. W^e are a province
of the new Rome, which the Vicar of Christ, if we are allowed to
so speak, has made almost heavenly." Historians tell us that at this
time the whole christian world stood astonished at the crowds of
pilgrims from the British Isles, who flocked to Rome to show their
respect and devotion to the Holy See.*
The churches of the East showed no less devotedness to the
Papacy. Soon after Sophronius ascended the chair of St. James
in the'patriarchate of Jerusalem, he declared that the mandate of
Pope Leo in 636 was to be his rule of faith. He also said that all the
* Hermianensis in 553. ^ increpatio in Clerum. ' Galland xU. 345. ■•Berc. vl. 274.
162 JERUSALEM APPEALS TO ROME.
papal bulls, briefs and constitutions emanating from the Popes up
to the time of Christ, the same should be received in Jerusalem as
though they came from St. Peter himself. These respectful senti-
ments of devotion were fully indorsed by all the bishops belong-
ing to the regions around Jerusalem. The bishops of Palestine
appointed Stephen the bishop of Dora to undertake a journey to
Rome to see the Pope to ask his assistance against the false doctrine
of the Monothelites, who claimed that Christ had only one will.
They gave him a letter to hand the Pope, containing among other
sentiments of obedience the following: "Peter, from whom you
hold the plenitude of Apostolic authority, was not only commis-
sioned to keep the Keys of Heaven and to feed the lambs of the
Lord, but he was moreover endowed with infallible faith, and
commanded to confirm his faltering brethren."
Then says Stephen, Sophornius the bishop of Jerusalem, led me
to Calvary, and on the spot sanctified by the awful mystery of our
redemption, he gave me this solemn pledge : "Hurry in all haste to the
Apostolic See, where the foundations of the orthodox faith exist.
Urge the "Vicar of Christ to pronounce his judgment, with that
apostolic prudence, which is fi-om God, that we may root out of
the church the novelties, which have of late sprung up among
us.'' For this, he says to the Pope, coming here I have approached
your Apostolic footstool, expecting and praying that you would hold
out your hand to the tottering faith of Christians. Grant then
this request. Holy Father, which I present in the name of all the
Orientals. You hold as a lamp the word of life for the whole world,
which when you introduce, you extinguish the darkness of
heresy."
About the same time 37 Archimandrites, Priests, Deacons and
clergymen of the Eastern church drew up a petition regarding these
matters presented by Stephen, concluding with: "We pray, we
appeal, and we conjure the Apostolic See to pronounce on this mat-
ter. " On the same occasion Sergius bishop of the island of Cyprus
wrote the Pope: "As the Divine Word has truly pronounced, you
are Peter and upon you the fundamental faith, the columns of the
church are founded. . .You keep the Keys of the Kingdom of
heaven, you have the power of binding and of loosing botli in hea-
ven and on earth, you are the Censor of hurtful errors, thou art the
prince and the teacher of unspotted faith."
The same hurtful errors having spread into Africa, the bishops
of Numidia, of Mauritania and of Byzantium presented an address
to the Pope saying: " There can be no doubt, that like a pure and
exhaustless spring, the Apostolic See pours its waters in constant
streams over the whole christian world. Whence no matter in
what regions, soever remote, nothing shall be done or received, un-
less it is first sent to your nourishing motherly See, that it may be
strengthened by a sentence of your just authority. " Farther on they
declare:. "From the See of Rome the other churches of the world
derive all their strength and authority. " In looking over the works
THE FIRST MISSIONARIES OF EUROPE. 163
of this early age we are struck with the simil?irity of the language
used by all bishops nations and sections of the church in Europe
Asia and in Africa. With one voice they all recognized the doctrin-
al authority of the Roman Pontiffs in matters of faith and of morals.
St. Maximus, master of the great Anastasius, from his secluded
retreat near Chalcedon wrote about the errors of Phyrrus: "If
Phyrrus wants to clear himself of the charge of heresy, let him
publicly justify his conduct. Let him prove his innocence to
the Pope of the Roman church, that is to the Apostolic See, which
to the fullest extent, has the power of binding and of loosing.
Because it is the Eternal Word Himself, who from the highest
heavens binds and loosens in the person of the Roman Bishop his
Vicar upon earth. If then Phyrrus justifies himself before
prelates of an inferior rank in the church, in place of before the
Sovereign Pontiff himself, he is like a man who when arraigned for
murder or other crime, tries to evade the law by establishing his
innocence before unauthorized persons, and not before the Judge,
who has the right of aquitting or of condemning him."
In the early ages of the Christian religion, the missionaries went
from Rome to christianize the different nations, and from the Holy
See they received their commissions. Whence we read that Pope
Celestine sent St. Patrick into Ireland; Gregory sent St. Augus-
tine to England; another Pope sent St. Dennis to convert the people
ancient of Paris; Pope Grregory commissioned St. Boniface to carry
the tidings of the Gospel to the Germans. So we could go on
and tell how all civilization in the world came from the Holy See.
When consecrated a bishop, St. Boniface the first aspostle of
Germany, as customary swore to guard inviolate the rights of the
Papacy saying: " Because the Blessed Peter, the Apostle, is the
head of the Apostolate and of the Episcopate." He used to ask the
advice of the Pope on many points of doctrine. One time the Pope
replied to his question: " We answer not of ourselves, as of our-
selves, but by power of our Apostolic authority." Boniface writing
of the christian Germans of his time: " They look for the doctrine
of primitive Christianity in the living Oracles of Christ's Represen-
tative, rather than in the holy pages or the traditions of our
ancestors."
In England, that great light of the early church Venerable
Bede, thus speaks the Pope and of the early English belief in
the primacy of Peter's successors: " Together with full judicial
power on all disputed points of doctrine, Peter received the keys
of heaven, as a sign to all the children of the church, that if they
separate from the one faith which he teaches, they give up all
hope of being acquitted of their guilt and of entering the eternal
portals." ' Writing about king Oswio, the same author says:
"^ This Saxon recognized the Roman Church as the catholic and
apostolic church, because her sovereign Pontiffs have succeeded
each other in an unbroken line from St. Peter down." The stat-
1 Horn, de Sts. Peter and Paul.
164 THE FOUR GREAT CHURCHES.
utesof the Synod held at Calchut, signed by all the bishops and
the chief clergymen of England living at that time, and which
were sent to Rome for approval, contains the most hearty obedi-
ence of the English church to the Pope.
There was no greater champion of the faith in that time than the
great St. John Damascene. Writing against the heretics of his age
he says: " Hear ye people and nations of every tongue. Hear
ye young and old. Depart not from the doctrine of the Apostolic
church, even though an angel should teach you otherwise." '
When the Abbot Stephen was confined in prison by the emper-
or, the latter called a council to further his evil designs, calling
it the Seventh General Council. The bishops who sat in it came
to announce its proceedings to Stephen, who at once exclaimed:
'^ How can a council meet and legislate without the authority and
consent of the Apostolic See?'"" Callistus reporting his answer to
the emperor said: "AVe are' conquered, it is impossible to resist
the learning and the reasoning of that man.'"
At that time the four gi*eatest churches after Rome were Con-
stantinople, Antiocli, Alexandria and Jerusalem, The patri-
archs of these ancient sees, together wrote to the emperor say-
ing, that because of the conquests of the Mahomedans in their
countries, they could not attend the council, stating at the same
time that their absence would not invalidate the proceedings, pro-
vided the decrees were confirmed by the Pope, at the same time
citing the Sixth General Council, the decrees of which had been
accepted all over the world, although the same three provinces
mentioned above were not represented in that council, saying that
the decrees had the very same authority as a General Council over
the whole church, because they were confirmed by the Pope.
At this time the great emperor Charlemagne associated with him
the celebrated and learned Alcuin, in the restoration of the litera-
ture of Europe, after it had been nearly destroyed by the incursions
of the Barbarians from the north, when they destroyed the Roman
Empire. To the newly elected Pope Adrian he wrote: ** As I ac-
knowledge you for the Successor of St. Peter, so I also recognize you
as the heir of his wonderful authority. I therefore surrender my-
self entirely to you. Blessed be the tongue of your mouth, which
speaks the saving words of life, at whose bidding the portals of
Heaven are opened to the believer." In his celebrated book On
the Divine Offices, he speaks in splendid language of the Pope. In
another letter to Pope Leo III he says: " In you, faith is resplendent.
Under your pastoral care the flock of the Lord increases. You are
the consolation of the afflicted, the help of the oppressed, the hope of
them that call on you, the light of life, the ornament of religion." *
In the same age Agilram bishop of Metz writing to Charlemagne
says: "Everyone knows that the Pope, wielding the power of
St. Peter, is authorized to pass sentence on all, the churches, and
that he is not subjected to the judgment of any other,"
» Sermo de Transfis:. ' Butler xvll. p. 368. * Baron, ad an, 772.
to rfi
O H
O M
166 LETTERS TO THE POPE.
The Caroline Books show us the faith of ancient France and
Germany in that early age. They state that: "the Holy See ad-
ministers the chalice of her preachings to all the churches of the
world."' ''From her after Christ they might get aid for the
nourishing of their faith, because the Holy See has neither spot
or stain, for she always crushes the proud heads of heretics, and
strengthens the hearts of the faithful in the faith." ** Wlience
it always receives the unction of faith." The same sentiments
are given by Agabond in his Letter to king Lewis the Pius. '
The religious teachings of the early French church may be
found in the Synods held at Soissons, " all teaching the infalli-
bility of the Pope, and his supremacy over all the churches of the
world, ^neas of Paris wrote a book about this time to show that
the Pope received his power, not from any council, or from other
authority, but from Christ by and through Peter. For proofs
he cites numerous historical documents, from the time of Ignatius
the martyred archbishop of Antioch, to the days of Photius the
author of the Greek schism. *
Theodore Studitain a letter to Leo IIL calls the Bishop of Rome
"The Head of all heads." Condemning the Greeks, then about
to fall into schism, he says: " Whenever those who err from truth
try to change anything in the catholic church, it is necessary to
refer it to Peter or to his successor." To Leo L he wrote these
words: " Imitate, we pray thee, the Pontiffs who bore your name,
and who sprang up like lions when the Eutychian heresy rose."
" Besides it belongs to him, led by the Holy Ghost, to make known
the wishes of God by whom other churches as well as this is ruled
and governed." " Again he says: ' ' I declare before God and man,
that in separating themselves from tliat chief See, in which Christ
has placed the keys of faith, against which the gates of hell have
never prevailed, nor will prevail as he promised, who does not lie
in separating from it," " they have separated from the body of
Christ."* In his letter to Pope Paschal he says: "For you are
Peter crowning and governing the See of Peter." ** Confirm then
your brethren. This is the proper time. Come from the West
and stretch out your saving hand to the East."
The Greeks and the national church of Russia on the 1 1th of
Nov. each year read the following, all relating to the Pope: "Stretch
out your hand to help the Church of Constantinople, and prove
thyself the successor of the first Leo. Listen favorably to our peti-
tion because thou art Peter to whom Christ said: "Confirm thy
brethren. " '
Again in the West rose the great Hincmar of Rheims. In
852 making his profession of faitli before the Council of Douzi he
said: "The Roman See is the Mistress of all the Churches
throughout the whole world." He continually declared that all dis-
* Lib Carol. » Delnstltutlon Retria.
' rt<!7. DonzlRTl. Pontlgny 876. Troyefl878. Tribur 895. < Speoll D'ArcheryHS, 148.
» Bar an 80». Berc vlll. 142. • Hard. Ix. 005.
' De Malstre Du Pap. page 90.
THE WRITERS OF THE MIDDLE AGES. 167
puted points once brought before that Holy See were ended
for all time, by the sentence of the Roman Pontiff. In a letter
to his nephew he said, that "it is the source of religion, from
which flows all discipline and canonical jurisdiction. " '
Eatramnus of Corby and Paulinus of Aquileia, both contempor-
ary with Hincmar, tell us, that such was the faith and the contin-
ual teachings of the church in their days. The former says: '' All
ecclesiastical decisions must be submitted to the judgment of the
Pope, that what is proper may remain and what is wrong may be
corrected. " ^ The latter writing of the continual troubles,
which disturbed the East, and contrasting it with the peace and
tranquility of the church in the West, or in Europe says: " We
strongly stand within the limits of the Apostolic doctrine and of
the Holy Roman Church, adhering to her most approved author-
ity and following its most holy doctrines."
The celebrated Raban Maur in the year 856 wrote the following
to Pope Gregory IV. : "Thou the golden light of the Apostolic See
of Rome, thou the teacher of the peoples, the nourishing love and
the ornament, .... Your tongue closes or opens heaven. For all
ages you are united to the Apostolic prince Peter. On earth
you carry his power. "
Lupus the friend and contemporary of Raban and of Hincmar in
the year 863 wrote of the See of Rome: " She neither deceived her-
self, nor was she ever deceived by another. " About the end of
the same century Hatto archbishop of Mayence, with the bishops
of Germany and of Bavaria, sent written communications to Pope
John IX. concluding: " That whatever may be wrong it may be
corrected by your authority. " Such are but a few proofs taken
from the writings of the early fathers and writers of the church.
We could give more but we hurry to other matters.
When councils meet, the bishops come, not because they can
define matters of faith and of practice, but that with and under
their head, they may examine the doctrines attacked, that by them
the definitions may receive more weight, be given more formality,
be defined by the Pope with more solemnity, and that they may be
carried back by the bishops to their dioceses in every part of the
world, and there taught to both clergy and laity, as coming from
the heir of him to whom Christ gave the feeding of his lambs and
sheep. No greater defenders of the supremacy and authority of
the Bishops of Rome can be found than the bishops themselves in
the early councils. Let us now see what the councils of the early
church say regarding the headship of the Bishops of Rome.
The first council of the church was held in the days of the
apostles, under the chairmanship of Peter at Jerusalem. ' In
that assembly, they deliberated relating to the keeping of the
Jewish ceremonials and customs. For while the Jewish con-
verts kept the law of Moses, the gentiles, who had entered the-
church, refused to follow the regulations of the Israelites.
1 Hist. Rem. 111. 13. ^ Nat Alexander, xli. * Acts vi. vil.
168 THE COUNCIL OF NICE.
The dispute waxed warm, till Peter rising in the midst of the
council; " The multitude held their peace,"' for the first Pope
was about to pronounce sentence, and Peter's decision settled the
matter. St. James, first bishop of Jerusalem, rose to introduce a
point of discipline, but in matters of faith he submitted to the
judgment of Peter.
The next general council of the church was held at Nice, in 325,
under the patronage of the emperor (/onstantine. It was called
by Pope Sylvester, who was not himself present, but he delegated
Osius bishop of Cardova and two priests as his companions to pre-
side in his name. Bishop Osius, with the two priests, occupied the
highest place in the assembly, over the great patriarchs and arch-
bishops of the other famous historic Sees, because they represented
the Papacy. ' Here we see in a year 325, bishojDS coming from all
parts of the world, still bearing the marks of suffering in that age
of faith. They assemble in council, and two simple priests take po-
sitions above all the ranks of the hierarchy of bishops and of arch-
bishops, because they reflected the rays of the authority of the Pope.
There two simple priests sit on the throne of the absent Pope, yet
not one word of protest rose from the patriarchs and archbishops of
the great apostolic chairs of Jerusalem, of Alexandria, of Antioch,
of Ephesus, of Caesarea, for they all acknowledged the Primacy
of Rome even at that early day. Not only that, but before the
meeting of the council, the three Legates of the Pope condemned
beforehand the heresy of Arius, who denied the divinity of Christ.
Before sending them as his delegates. Pope Sylvester drew up the
articles of faith relating to the Divinity of our Lord, and the
rules of procedure and of discipline, which he desired to be followed.
Not one found a word of fault, because they all recognized the
power of Peter in his successor St. Sylvester. At that, the first great
meeting for the first time of all the bishops of the whole world
gathered at Nice, because they could not meet at Rome before, on ac-
count of the persecutions of the pagan world. At one end of the great
hall of the assembly sat the three legates of the absent Pope, vested
in cope and mitre, and at the other in all the splenders of royalty sat
Constantine glittering in purple and gold, the first christian ruler
of the vast Roman Empire. At the close of the council, the Acts
were sent to Rome for the confirmation of the Pope. Before this
confirmation they were not held as having weight.
To this afterwards referred Pope Felix IIL in the year 483 when
he said to the clergy of the East *'The three hundred and eighteen
Fathers meet at Nice, remembering the words of the Lord **Thou
art Peter " ** transmitted all the decrees of the Council to the
Roman Church for confirmation. " Pope Gelesius, his successor
elected in the year 402, a hundred years before the conversion of
England, remmded the bishop of Darania that the Acts of no
Council bind till confirmed by the Pope, saying ** As that which,
the Roman See did not sanction could not stand, thus what she
' Acts zl. * Sozom. L. I. C. xtI. Concil Cbal. Act. i. and Act. xrtU. Condi ConsUnt 111.
THE FIRST COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 169
judges right, the whole church receives. The whole thing is placed
under the power of the Apostolic See. What the Apostolic See
confirms from her it receives strength, what she rejects cannot
have any strength."
We must remember that the Council of Nice assembled in the
year 325. It was the first council of any importance, and the
only one in which all the bishops of the world assembled since
the days of the apostles. The 39th Canon, very probably authentic
reads: " The incumbent of the Eoman See acting as the Vicar of
Christ over the whole church is the head of the patriarchs as
Peter was. " ' This canon is not positively authentic.
Pope Boniface I., elected in the year 418, said to the bishops of
Thessalonica: "The Fathers of the council did not legislate any-
thing for the Eoman See, because they saw that they could not
impose anything upon her, for they knew from the words of the
Lord that he had given all power to her."
The next General Council was held at Constantinople in the year
381. At first it was but a simple provincial Synod of the bishops
subject to the archbishop of that imperial city. They assembled
by command of Pope Damasus, who called them against the her-
etical doctrines of the Appolarians, Macedonians, &c. According
to the testimony of Sozomenus, they believed that these disputes
had already been ended by the decision of Pope Damasus. The
words of Sozomenus are ''Whence it happens that by the judgment
of the Eoman Church, the dispute is finished, they are at rest, and
it appears that an end has come." But as the false teachers did not
stay quiet, the Pope determined to comdemn them in a more
solemn and public manner, the emperor Theodosius the great
called the council.'* The bishops of the Eastern or Asiatic churches,
headed by Bazel, the primate of the province of Cappadocia,
addressed a letter to Pope Damasus, asking that the Papal Eescript
condemning the heretics be also published in the East, as well as
in the West, saying: " We ask that it be published and promul-
gated in all the churches of the East." The Pope replying
reminds them, that they must render him reverence and
obedience, concluding with " Let above all your charity render
the required obedience and reverence to this Apostolic See."
When the council met, the same Pope rejected their disciplinary
canons.^
For nearly a thousand years these disciplinary canons re-
mained without force, till they were at last confirmed by a re-
script of Pope Innocent III. in the thirteenth century. But those
parts of the council not confirmed by the Holy See, were never
considered as of any binding force in the church. The Pope saw
no necessity for issuing a bull condemning Timothy the heretic,
after the council met, because he had already given a formal con-
demnation of him before the assembling of the bishops. AVhence
» Acta Concll. Nicaena Can. 39. ^ Baronius ad Aa 381 N. 19.
* Gregor. Mag. ad Patriarch. Alexan. and to Cyriacus Constantinople.
170 THE COUNCIL AT EPHESUS.
he wrote to the assembled bishops: " For we have ah-eady given
the formula, that those who confess themselves as christians that
they hold it. Why then do you ask me a second time to condemn
Timothy 'i"
When in the year 431 the council of Ephesus was called at that
city, by the invitation of the emperor Theodosius in order to con-
demn the errors of Nestorius, who taught that Christ had two
Persons, one of God the other of man, before the meeting of the
bishops. Pope Celestin issued a bull to take effect ten days after
being received, in which he excommunicated Nestorius, if he did not
retract his errors within that time. The conditions laid down
by the Pope were, that he should be deposed from the See of Con-
stantinople. The Pope authorized Cyril patriarch of Alexandria
to proceed against him according to the following words of the
Pope to Nestorius: " You know our sentence, that unless
within ten days you openly and in writing condemn your errors,
you are deposed from the communion of the Catholic and univer-
sal Church."' Besides this letter to Nestorius, the Pope sent an-
other mandate to the bishops of the East declaring himself above
and independent of them, or of all the Bishops of the world even
when assembled in a General Council: '* We command you "he
wrote to his Legates, " to maintain the dignity of the Apostolic
See. When, therefore, any discussion arises, you shall pass sen-
tence on the opinions advanced, but you must not enter the lists as
disputants But what we have already decided, you shall
not interfere with." When the Papal Legates read these instruc-
tions to the assembled bishops, the latter replied: "From the
earliest ages of the church, it has always been held as indisput-
able, that the Prince of the apostles, the pillar of truth, the
foundation stone of the Catholic Church, is Peter, who received
the Keys of the kingdom of heaven. He always lives in his succes-
sors, and pronounces his judgment by their lips."
In the most solemn manner the bishops at the council condemned
Nestorius and his errors. But when the council officially notified
the emporer of their condemnation, they said that they acted thus
according to the instructions of the Pope, whose previous con-
demnation directed them to do so, while the Pope rested his
authority entirely on the authority of Peter. AVhile the sessions of
the council were being held, Theodore bishop of Ancyra rose and
said: '*The Lord of the universe, hath showed by the letter of
Celestin, that the sentence of condemnation promulgated by the
Synod is just." In a letter they wrote to the Pope, asking him
to confirm the decrees of the council, they stated that they had
followed his instruction in all things. Afterwards Celestin's suc-
cessor, Sixtus, writing to John, patriarch of Constantinople about
the matter says: " You may judge from the transactions of the
Council at Ephesus what is meant by conforming to the judgments
of the holy See. St. Peter has transmitted to his successors the
> Hard. 1. 1299.
THE FOURTH GENERAL COUNCIL. 171
power received from Christ." Even to-day, the Liturgical books
of the Russian church say that the errors of Nestorius were de-
stroyed by Pope Celestin, and not by the council at Ephesus. *
In 440, Leo the G reat sat on the throne of Peter. Eutyches in the
cloisters of Constantinople had more than 300 monks under him.
While combatting the errors of Nestorius who claimed that Christ
had two persons, Eutyches went to the other extreme, and taught
that Christ had but one nature. His doctrines soon became popu-
lar in tlie schools of Arabia and of Alexandria. The emporer Mar-
xian wrote to Pope Leo the Great, asking him to call a council of
the bishops of the universal Church, that the error might be con-
demned, ''as it were," he says, "by the Blessed Peter himself."
Yielding also to the empress Pulcheria, the bishops of the world
were called with a letter concluding with the words "that the
rights and the honors of the Apostolic See of Peter may be saved."
More than 630 bishops came to this council from all parts of the
christian world. Paschasius was the Legate of the Pope.
Opening the assembly in 451, he declared in the name of the
Pope, that Dioscorus, having held a council without the author-
ity of the Holy See, that therefore he had forfeited his seat in this
council of the universal church. Acting on the orders of the
Pope's legate, he was excluded from the assembly. The council
then entered on the deliberations, acting on the instructions of
the Pope. They all drew up a form of belief or articles of faith,
to Avhich each gave his assent, except the Papal legate, who re-
fused to receive his faith except from the Pope himself. Having
by this reversed the decisions of the fathers of the former council,
they all exclaimed: "What Leo believes we all believe. Anath-
ema be he who believes otherwise. Peter has spoken thiough Leo."
Then Acropius spoke up: " His Holiness the Pope sent us a form-
ula of faith. We are bound to follow it, and to subscribe to its
requirements." Then the members of the council cried out:
" That is what we wanted, no better exposition of faith can be
had." When the council adjourned this session, as had been cus-
tomary from the apostolic age, they sent the decrees of the coun-
cil to the Pope for confirmation, saying in the letter they for-
warded him: "We have a rock of refuge in Peter, who alone has
the absolute right of deciding in the place of God, because he alone
has the keys of heaven. All his definitions therefore bind as
coming from the Vicegerent of Christ." The council then de-
posed the bad bishop Dioscorus with the words: "He that is the
foundation stone of the faith, has divested him of the episcopal
dignity, Leo the Bishop of Eome, but re-echoes the sentence of
blessed Peter. Whosoever shall not abide by the instructions of
his Holiness is a heretic."'' In memory of this contest the Rus-
sian Church still says in its liturgy: "How shall I extol thee
Leo, heir of the invincible rock?"
1 Hard. 1. 1299 Nicephorus xiv. 34 Hard. 1. 1503 Condi. T. ill. p. 136 Malstre Du Pape 1. 91.
2 Acta Concil. Iv. Sess.
172 THE FIFTH AND SIXTH GENERAL COUNCIL.
We now come to the fifth General Couueil, which was the second
held at Constantinople. It opened in the year 553. The emperor
Justinian had before invited Pope Vigilius to visit him at the
imperial city of Constantinople. But the Pope could not agree to
the usurpations of the emperor, who wanted to interfere in the
church government, and who had confiscated church property and
encroached on the rights of the Holy See. The emperor got mad and
put the Pope his guest in prison. In going to prison the Pope said
to the emperor: *' Remember that although you have enchained
Vigilius, you cannot imprison Peter.'' The emperor then resorted
to violence. Soon afterwards, getting out of prison, the Pope took
refuge in the church of St. Sophia at Chalcedon. From tliere he
issued an anathema against all who dare to teach the condemned er-
rors, while beforehand he pronounced void and null all acts or
statutes enacted by a council which the . emperor had called.
When the emperor called the bishops of the Roman Empire to
the council, he invited also the Pope, who refused to attend,
to show that the Pope alone had authority to call and preside
over a council of the universal church. When the bishops assem-
bled, they followed to the most minute detail the instructions of
the Pontiff, stating in the letters they sent him: "We profess
that we receive the letters of the Roman Pontiff with the same
faith as we do the four Gospels."' After all this, such sus-
picions hung around this council, that it was many centuries be-
fore it was received as authentic in the church, until it was
known certainly that the decrees were confirmed bv the Holy
See.
In the year 680 Pope Agathon, at the request of the emperor
Constantine the Bearded, called a council of the whole episcopacy
at Constantinople, to condemn the teachings of those who held
that our Lord had only one will, the Divine will. The heretics
taught at that time that he had no human will.
The Legates of the Pope, presided over them. The Pope sent
them these Avords: "They shall not presume to increase, dimin-
ish or change, but keep the traditions of this Apostolic See, as
given and instituted by the Apostolic Pontiffs." In his letter to the
emperor, the Pontiff reminds him of the faith of the See of Rome:
" This Apostolic church never turned from the way of truth, or
held any kind of error This is the true rule of faith. All bish-
ops, priests and laics, who wish to please the God of truth, must
study to conform to the Apostolic rule of the primitive faith,
founded on the rock Peter, and kept by him from error."
In his letter to the council, the Pope tells the bishops that they
must not dare to debate the questions, but to embrace in a com-
pendious manner the articles he before had sent them, and then to
promulgate them his doctrines all over the world. Before the
council met, the Pontiff had already pronounced on the disputed
questions, and no one was allowed even to debate in the cQuncil,
> GreR. Mag. Ub. Ul. Ep. 27. Facand. Ub. U.
THE IMAGE BREAKERS. 173
the questions he had already settled by his infallible decision. Even
the bishops at the council exclaimed at one of the sessions: ''It
seemed to us paper and ink, but Peter has spoken through
Agathon." Demetrius, bishop of Persias, remarked at the council:
" I received the instructions of Agathon, as dictated under the in-
spiration of the Holy Ghost by the blessed Peter, the prince of the
Apostles." In their letter to the emperor, the bishops said that
they received the letters of the Pope as coming from heaven.
Even the same sentiments were re-echoed by the emperor himself.
Soon after he wrote to the Pope these words: ''We all received
your dogmatic words with open arms, and thought that we had,
when receiving them, the pleasure of embracing Peter himself,
when he confessed the Divinity of Christ." When the emperor
sent these decrees of the council around into every city of the
Greek empire, of which he was the head, he sent them not in the
name of the bishops of the whole world in council, but in the
name of the Pope himself.
The errors of the Imagebreakers rose some time later in the
East. In the year 787 Pope Adrian I. condemned them by two
letters, one to the emperor, the other to the empress and required'
that these letters be received as matters of faith from him, because
he sat on the chair of Peter. He said of the Popes his predeces-
sors: " To whom in Peter the Lord gave the power of authority,
and he also transmitted it by divine right to the Pontiffs his suc-
cessors." "From her" the Roman Church, " the other churches;
receive the documents of faith." ,
We must remember that the seat of the Roman Empire had been
removed from Rome to Constantinople by Constantine about the
year 312, and that from that date, Rome the City of the Popes,
was but a small city compared to Constantinople, the seat of the
great Empire of Rome. From that time, Rome and her Pontiffs
gave the faith to the whole world. The power of the Papacy rose
over other churches therefore, not from the importance of
its position, but it rested its authority in the successor of St. Peter
himself. At the opening of the II. council of Nice, the legates of
Pope Adrian I. presided over all the bishops, and they first read
the dogmatic letters of his Holiness, defining from the Chair of
Peter the doctrines in dispute. Then the presiding legate asked
in a most solemn manner of the archbishop of Cpnstantinople:
" Let the Patriarch tell us, let the council tell us, do they agree
to the letters of the most holy Pope, the senior of Rome or not ?
because as his Judgment is irreformable, neither reason nor faith
will allow us to change it. " All the Fathers of the council without
a single exception replied: " We follow him. We admit the let-
ters. We agree with him. " In signing the acts every bishop
added before his name: " With the grace of Christ our Lord,
the true God, I believe and profess whatever is contained in the
letters of his Holiness the Pope of Rome. My faith is that of
Pope Adrian. " Tarasius patriarch of Constantinople, writing
174 THE GREEK SCHISM.
afterwards to the Pope, made liis profession of faith in these words:
*' Your Holiness has attained the Chair of Peter the Apostle"
and speaking of the official definition of the Pope sent to the coun-
cil, before the meeting of the bishops, he says: "These are the Di-
vine Oracles. "
About the middle of the ninth century, by the treachery of
Photius, again the religious peace of Europe was threatened. In
the year 870 the VIII. General Council was called at Constantinople,
it being known as the IV. of Constantinople under Adrian II.
He was aided by the emperor Bazel, who took a great deal of pains
to gather together the bishops at Constantinople, the capital of the
"Greek empire. Before the first session of the council, the Pope
had sent a letter to the emperor, commanding the bishops of the
universal church under the most severe censures, to burn the acts
and decrees of the former meeting of the few bishops under Photius,
who claimed independence of the Holy See, and who was even then
beginning the division, which later resulted in separating the Greek
church from the seat of unity at Rome. This division exists to
our day in the Russian church and the separated schismatics of the
East or Asiatic churches. The Pope wrote: " Let not one iota, or
tittle remain of these decrees, for the clergymen who do so, will
be deprived, not only of their right as clergymen, but also of
the dignity of the whole christian name. " Having carefully ex-
•ecuted the commands of the Pope, the Fathers of the council ex-
claimed with one voice: " Blessed be the Lord, who has deigned
to accept some satisfaction for your Holiness. "
Before this Pope Adrian had sent to the council a rule of faith
called " The Libellus. " It contained all the chief articles of the
catholic faith. In it the Pope stated that unless the bishops sub-
scribed to it, they could not hope to be reconciled with the church
and with the Holy See. The first article of this statement says:
" Our Lord said to Simon ; * Thou art Peter and upon this rock
I will build my church. ' " He then decreed that history proves
that this promise of the Saviour has been kept. Then he con-
tinues: " What has been said proves the effect of these things,
because the holy catholic religion, and its famous teaching has
been kept and guarded unspotted by the Apostolic See. "
After the council had passed the decree as commanded by Pope
Adrian, the bishops signed the Acts of the council, every bishop
signing his na\ne with the formula: " In the presence of the un-
dersigned witnesses I (name of bishop) have affixed my signature
to the profession of my faith, drawn up by the most blessed Adrian,
the supreme Pontiff and universal Pope. " At the second session
of the council, all the bishops who had fallen into the schism by
following Photius, were separately asked if they still persisted in
their course.
After they had heard the " Libellus" of Pope Adrian read, they
replied to the legate: " We accept your judgment as that of the
person of the Son of God. " In the third session the legates read
KICHOLAS I. AGAINST THE COUNCIL. 175
still another letter from Pope Adrian to the patriarch Ignatius,
archbisliop of Constantinople, in which the bishop of Rome de-
clared, that the decisions of the Papacy are irrevocable. In Igna-
titus' reply to Nicholas I. the predecessor of Adrian, which was
read in the third session of this council, he says: " For the
trouble of the body there are many physicians, but for the wounds
of the soul there is but one the bishop of the soul. " " l^hey, the
Popes, are the rooters-oat of heresies, and the destroyers of the
tares and weeds of heresies. " " Whence we consider the blessed
Pope Nicholas and his most holy successor Adrian as being the
organ of the Holy Ghost. " All, including the emperor, wrote,
asking the Pope to recognize as valid the holy orders administer-
ed by the intruder Photius, who was related to the emperor, but
who ordained clergymen, who still required jurisdiction for some
of the sacraments. This was the request of a general council,
strengthened by the whole force of the empire, a powerful proof
of the belief of the whole world at that day. They requested in
vain. The Bishop of Rome refused to recognize the orders admin-
istered by the man, who had intruded himself into the See of St.
Ignatius. The Pope replied '• It is not in us. It is and it is
not. We cannot contradict ourselves. '' He replied thus, because
before the council had met, he stated that he would not consider
as legitimate the holy orders administei'ed by the bad usurping
bishop Photius, even with the whole power of the Roman empire
behind him.
Such is a brief history of the VIII. first important councils held
in the East, which show in striking manner the Bishops of Rome
independent of and above all councils of the church. During
these centuries numerous other councils, no less famous, had been
held in the West, that is in Europe, and they also show the Roman
Pontiffs in the same light as the Supreme Shepherds of souls. But
we have given the story of the Eastern councils, for the East was
«oon to fall into the Greek schism, inte which they still remain
plunged.
Thus in her great writers and in her councils, we find the divine
•constitution of the church so clearly proved, that any unbiased
mind must see, that Peter in his successors still feeds the sheep
and lambs of Christ.
Such therefore is Rome, the city of Peter and of Paul, the head
and the capital of the christian world. Let us end this chapter
by the words of two great christian fathers, regretting that no trans-
lation can give their original beauties. St. Leo says preaching to
the Romans long ago on the feasts of Sts. Peter and Paul:' " For
these are the men by whom the Gospel of Christ was preached at
Rome, which city was first the Mistress of error, but which later
became the disciple of truth. These were your fathers and your
true pastors. They built another empire for you, and led you into
a more heavenly kingdom, much greater than the kingdom con-
1 29th June.
176 STS. LEO AND CHRTSTOM.
quered by your fathers, better than the one Avhom your founder
soiled by a brother's death.' These apostles led you into this glory,
that you might be a holy nation, a people elect, a priestly and &
royal city. By the holy See of blessed Peter, you became the head
of the whole world, that by a divine religion you might rule wider
and by a power greater than by any earthly dominion. . . .For it
better agreed with divine providence, that many kingdoms might
unite in your one empire, so that later to many people the same
preaching might extend, which the power of one city held. But
this city, knowing not the destiny of providence over her, when she
had conquered nearly all nations she served and believed in the
errors of all. Then she received a religion which had no error,
whence inasmuch as she was held by the strength of the devil,
she was delivered more wonderfully by Christ.* " Whence these
two wonderful seeds of the divine Word sprouted and brought
forth their harvest, the thousands of Martyrs, emulating the tri-
umphant death of the apostles reddened our City with their
blood, and shone forth far and wide to other peoples But in
the superiority of these Fathers we give greater glory, for the
grace of God raised them to the highest pinnacle among all the
members of the saints, among those who form one body, of which
Christ is the head.'
''Yes, if we were there we would see him (Peter) although we
stand not near, we will see near by him, a royal throne shining
forth, where the Cherubim worship God, where the Seraphim fly;
there Ave will see Paul, with Peter the chief and the prince of the
choir of saints, and we will rejoice in their double charity And
therefore I love Rome, and for other reasons I look to her than for
her size, her ancient glories, her beauties, her numerous popula-
tion, her power, her riches and for the wonderful things done iu
her. But all these thrown aside, I call her blessed, because Paul,
while he lived was kind to her citizens, and therefore he loved
them, he preached to them, and later among them he ended his
life, they have his holy body, and therefore this city has become
great, greater than all other human things, and as the full-grown
body has two sparkling eyes, thus she has the bodies of these
two Here Paul was carried, here Peter. Think and be
frightened at the scene Rome is to see, — Paul with Peter rising
above to meet the coming of the Lord. What kind of a rose will
Rome send to Christ ? By what kind of a double crown will this
City bedecked? *
> He alludes to the Roman empire founded bv Romulus who killed his brother soon after
Rome was founded. ' St. Leo Sermo I In Nat. SS Ap. Petri et PauU.
> Ibidem in Fine. * St. Cbrystom Sermo 9i In moral. E. host.
:g?!p(itpSp^^^|l^^P^i^!!?!?^^
fHE Father opens his divine
intelligence and gives rise
^viiz/' to his Thought, his mental
Word, who "In the begin-
ning was the Word and the Word
was with God and the Word was
God.'" The Word is the Son re-
vealed to man from the time his
human nature was created. He
came down from heaven to earth,
that he might teach mankind the
way to heaven, that he might govern
his Kingdom on this earth, thus
preparing us for the Glories he had
with his Father before the world was.
All revelation then may be re-
duced to two kinds of supreme prin-
ciples or series of truths. — one relat-
ing to what we must believe — the
I John i. 1.
1;7
1
fli^^lrn '
1
1
THE CHURCH TEACHES FAITH AND MORALS. 179
other to what we must do in order to be saved. This agrees with
the nature of man,' whose mind sees truth and whose will rules
his moral actions. Mind and free will in action make our reason,
making us differ from beasts, who are ruled by instinct and by
passion. By reason then man rises to the serene sphere of an in-
tellectual being, like the angel and like unto God, whose divine
Intelligence, the Son, by his laws rules all creation.
The Intelligence or Truth of God is his only begotten Son, ever
generated from the Father, whose images are the thoughts of
every created mind, bringing forth faint reflections of his infinite
perfections. The Good of God is the Holy Spirit to whose like-
ness we foi-m each good thought and action. In creation God
made each creature to the image and the likeness of his divine
Son, and the Holy Spirit who "moved over the waters" on the
morning of creation now rules his church, the last and most won-
derful of created things. In the revelation of God to man, the
divine Son acts in the mind by the truths revealed of him, and la
the will the Holy Ghost acts by his grace. Dogmatic theology
treats of the truths of revelation proposed to the human mind,
and moral theology tells the will what to do, that the minds of
men may be enlightened by his truths and that the actions of
men may be right and according to the Will of God. Thus
while the Son enlightens the intelligence of the race, the Holy
Ghost strengthens the wills of men by his indwelling in the soul.
Thus the Son and Spirit of God poured out upon the world, act
on the noblest faculties of mankind, raising them up to a super-
natural state, and preparing them for the coming glories of heaven.
The church being the organ of God, she acts in the mind by teach-
ing truth, and on the will by pouring grace into the soul. Thus
the Son and Spirit of God teaches and sanctifies mankind. The
church alone has received from God the right and the power of
saying what God has revealed, and telling which actions are good
and which are bad. She is then the teacher of faith and of mor-
als, she is the spiritual government of mankind. But the church
is composed of a great many persons. The laity sit at her feet and
listen to her teaching. They are not the teachers but the listen-
ers. The bishops are the teaching officers of the church while
the priests under them are their aids and helpers. But the mem-
bers of the mystic body of Christ do not speak for themselves.
For the head speaks by and through the mouth. The head alone
directs the body. The head of the church teaches and directs the
members of the body. Thus in nature the head directs the body.
The Bishop of Rome is the head of the church. He is the teach-
er of faith and morals. To him in the person of Peter, Christ
gave the supernatural power of feeding his lambs and sheep, and
of confirming his brethren in the episcopacy. Every priest and
bishop in the church but reflects the intellectual light which flows
out from him the Bishop of Rome whom the Holy Spirit keeps
from error.
180 IX WHAT THE POPE IS NOT INFALLIBLE.
The Pope is not the teacher of the church in his private life,
but in his public and official life. Heir of Peter sitting on
the eternal throne of the Fisherman he teaches the universal
church what God has revealed, what we are to believe, and what
we must do in order to be saved. His teaching power has noth-
ing to do with his private life. It is attached to his office as the
visible head of the visible church. Because he is the Vicar of our
Eedeemer, the Holy Spirit keeps him from error, so that he
may not deceive the people of God. He cannot manufacture any
new doctrines; he cannot increase or weaken what God has re-
vealed as found in the holy Bible or in the traditions of the
christian church; his office as teacher is to " keep the deposit of
truth " revealed in the Bible and in tradition to the world, a rev-
elation finished and ended by the coming of our blessed Lord.
He is not infallible in appointing bishops, in forming rules for
particular dioceses or provinces of the church, in arranging treat-
ies and concordances with nations, in passing judgments in par-
ticular cases of discipline, in teaching a part of the church, but
leaving out some of the clergy or people, in correcting abuses in
certain dioceses, in appointing men to offices in the church, or in
writing private letters. He is infallible only when as Head of the
whole church ,he defines matters of faith and morals revealed by God
in the Bible and in tradition, and in teaching the whole world what
God has taught in the Bible and in all truths necessarily connected
with the preservation of religion. Many authors say that by the
words of Christ to Peter " I have prayed for thee, Peter, that thy
faith fail not, and that thou being once converted confirm thy
brethren," ' means that the catholic faith is secured to the
Bishop of Eome as heir of Peter's power, and that he will never
fall into even private error acting as a private man. In fact his-
tory does not give us the example of any Pontiff falling from the
faith of Christ. Even in their private lives they were all men of
the soundest faith and purest morals, and this seems reasonable.
For it would be difficult to suppose a Pope proclaiming to the
whole church as a truth revealed by God, what he did not in his
heart firmly believe.
All writers both within and without the church agree that the
Pontiff, even after advising with his cabinet could err in a dis-
puted point regarding any particular fact except a dogmatic fact,
proved by the testimony of men. All catholics say that he may
err as a private man in his private opinions regarding faith and
morals, the same as any other man. They also agree in saying
that the Pontiff presiding over a general council cannot err in
decrees of faith and morals. We cannot suppose a general coun-
cil of all the bishops of the world meeting without their natural
and only head and chairman, the Bishop of Rome, personally or
by his legate presiding over them. The bishops in such a univer-
sal council taken separately are not the infallible teachers of
> Luke xxli. 82.
MEANING OF THE WORD INFALLIBLE. 181
faith and morals, and when they assemble in a council they do
not change their nature and become infallible teachers. Taken
separately from their natural head, the Pontiff, either scattered
in their dioceses, or united in council they, are not infallible. For
not to the apostles did Christ say " Feed my lambs Feed my
sheep", but to Peter alone said the Lord these words. The un-
failing teacher of the church then is the heir and the successor of
Peter, lighting up the whole church by the teachings of his super-
naturally enlightened mind. The Pope is the head of the gener-
al council, and the head speaks but not the members of the body.
Thus the council of the whole church cannot reform the decrees
of the Pope as the Vatican council defined.'
Each organism comes into the world more or less imperfect,
but by the lapse of time it develops into a perfect animal or man.
God revealed to the human race all things wanted for the salva-
tion of mankind. But these truths were not given so clearly that
all men might see them at once. By lapse of time they became
more and more clear to the human mind, as the organism of the
church developed from age to age.*
The word infallible comes from the Latin and means not liable
to err. Thus any one who teaches truths coming from human
reason isiilfallible. But the Pope is infallible only when he teaches
the supernatural truths, that is what God revealed in the Bible
and in holy tradition. The constitution of the church is found in
the Bible and in tradition. But the Holy Spirit does not give
every one the power of interpreting the Bible. That belongs to
Peter and to his successors in the See of Rome, in office as confirmers.
of their brothers the other bishops. The Pope is infallible only
when he speaks from the chair of Peter as the teacher of the whole
world teaching matters belonging to faith and morals. If he were
to leave any one out, or teach only a section of the world, or pro-
claim a thing not pertaining to revelation, then he would not be in-
fallible. From this the reader will see that the Pope only claims
what all members of the Protestant churches claim for themselves,
the guidance of the Holy Spirit in the interpretation of religion.
Therefore what Protestants call — the private interpretation of the
Scriptures, — and which they think belongs to all persons, the church
holds as belonging only to the head of the church, to the Pope
the successor of St. Peter. The infallibility of the Pope consists
in this, that he is the divinely appointed Interpreter of revelation,
the Guardian of the ''Deposit of Faith, the Teacher of the chil-
dren of God, and the Vicar of Christ."
The church is infallible in her teachings because of the infalli-
bility of her head. The head and body cannot be divided, for
that would be the death of the body. To the church Christ said :
" Going forth therefore teach ye all nations." " Behold I am with
you all days even to the consummation of the world." * The Holy
* CoDcil. Vat. Cap. iv. ^ See Card. Newman, Development of Chrtstlan Doctrine.
8 Matt, xxvill. 20.
182 BISHOPS ARE NOT INFALLIBLE.
Spirit animates the whole body of the church, as the soul of man
animates his body. The soul of man speaks through and by his
mouth in the head. So the Holy Ghost speaks through and by
the head of the church. Whence the Pope is infallible by the as-
sistance of the Holy Spirit. In former days the same Holy Ghost
spoke by and through the prophets of the Old Testament. In the
same way he now speaks in and by the Pope but in a different
manner. For the inspiration of the prophets was a direct and a
positive act of the Spirit of God. But in the Pope the action of
the indwelling Spirit of God is not so prominent as in the prophets.
For the Holy Ghost only keeps the Pope from teaching error to-
the world, when sitting on the Chair of Peter.
Whence that infallibility given to the church through and by
Peter is a special and direct act of the supernatural, so that the
Vicar General, the prime Minister of Christ may not deceive the
human race, and in the name of Christ teach what is false; that
the church might keep bright and unspotted the series of truths
revealed to mankind. Thus the church is a ''path and a way,
there shall be, and it shall be called the holy way, the unclean
shall not pass ovc* it, and this shall be unto you a straight way so-
that fools shall not err therein ?" ' Therefore whosoever follows the
teachings of the infallible church, shall be sure of their salvation,
even if they are unlearned, because they shall be taught by Jesus
Christ himself, who speaks to them by the mouth of his Vicar the
Pope.
The Pope therefore is infallible because he is the teacher of the
universal church. The bishop and clergy are also infallible be-
cause they teach what the Pope teaches and reflect the rays of his
infallibility, like the planets which shine not by their own light
but by the light of the sun around which they revolve. " In
Peter therefore the firmness of all is strengthened, and the aid of
divine grace is so ordained, that the strength, which was given by
Christ to Peter, through Peter it was confirmed on the apostles." *
The infallibility of the Pope comes not from his union with the
bishop but from his union with Christ, while the infallibility of
the other bishops and the priests of the whole church comes from
him, and it is but the reflection of his individual infallibility.
The Pope being the Vicar and the prime minister of Ciirist.
what he does in his office as Pope binds Christ. For to him in
the person of Peter Christ said: " I will give to thee the keys of
the kingdom of heaven, and whatever thoushalt bind on earth it
shall be bound also in heaven, and whatever thou shalt loose up-
on earth it shall be loosed also in heaven."' In the Pope there-
fore the three powers of teaching, sanctifying and of ruling the
people of God exist in the highest and most eminent degree. As
the teacher of the church Christ said to him: "Confirm thy
brethren."* As the chief minister of the Lord he said: " Feed my
' Isalas XXV. S. » St. Leo Sermo. Iv. 8. * Matt. xvl. 19.
* Luke xxll. 32.
THE HEAD RULES THE BODY. 183
lambs Feed my sheep."' As the head and ruler of the whole
church he said to him: ''Whatever thou shalt bind upon earth
it shall be bound also in heaven " &C.''
It is false then to suppose that the church is infallible and that
the Pope is only the mouthpiece of the infallible church, and that
he is not infallible in his own person. For each of the bishops
are not infallible when considered separately, and when they meet
in council they cannot give an infallibility which they have not.
For in the councils of the church, they derive their infallibility
from their head the Eoman Pontiff, who in his turn obtains his
infallibility from his remarkable union with Christ. It is the in-
fallibility of the Spirit of Christ who dwells in him.
The Spirit of Christ, the Holy Ghost, the " Spirit of Truth," the
Soul of the church, he teaches the world through the Pope, and
that Spirit of Christ keeps him from teaching, erring and deceiving
the world in the name of Christ. For Christ " gave to Peter,
and gave to him alone, all the fulness of what belonged to him-
self." ^ ''The Roman Pontiff has been always called the head of
the church."- "The bishop of the catholic church."' "The
source and the origin of the episcopacy." * "The chief of bish-
ops."^ To sum all up we say with St. Ambrose: "Where Peter
is there is the church." *
The diocese of Rome has stood. The Papacy is eternal. For Christ
is the Son of God, infinite and he is all powerful to save from
falling the corner stone of the universal church he founded. For
that reason the Popes live forever in an atmosphere of the super-
natural. For they are the Vicars of Christ, the mouthpiece and
the organ of the Holy Ghost. That grace given to Peter was not
for him alone, not for him personally, but also for his successors
in the See of Rome. That commission was given him personally
for the universal church. That grace was to govern, confirm, and to
strengthen all his brethern in the episcopacy, in the work of the
apostolate, to uphold the other diocese by the strength Christ
gave to Peter, and by him to the Popes.
For if the head is strong and enlightened, the whole body par-
takes in its wisdom, and the organism advances sure on the
road to perfection. For that reason the Lord gave power to Peter
to direct the whole church confided to his care. Being the one
Rock with Christ, Peter and his successors form with him one
authority, one government. But lest they might direct the world
wrong, lest they might compromise the teachings left to the world
and deceive the human race, to avoid these terrible evils, the Lord
gave to Peter and in him to the Popes infallibility in teaching mat-
ters of faith and morals, when sitting on the episcopal throne of
Peter.
The Vicar of Christ then is the religious teacher of mankind.
1 John xxi. 19. ■ Matt. xvl. 19. ' St. Leo L. Cit. p. 140, 2.
■• St. Chrystom Hom. 80, ad prop. ^ Concil. Chal. et Constantinople In Epit Synod.
« St. Cvp'ren Eplst. 45, ad Cornel.
^ Synod Afric. ad Tbeod. St. Jerome Cont. Jovin Tertul. de Pudlc. cl. " In Psl. 40. n. 30.
184 HOW DOCTRINES ARK DEFINED.
By divine right it belongs to Peter to define what God has taught
in the holy Bible, what Christ left to the apostles, and what may
be found in the traditions of the church. Being head of the vis-
ible church, he is the mouthpiece of the whole mystic body of
Christ. For the body speaks by the head in any organization,
because the mouth is always in the head. But the head receives
nourishment and completeness from the body. So the Pope is
aided by the body of the whole episcopacy of the church, but above
all he finds his help in the body of the cardinals, the chief clergy
of the Eoman diocese, who have especially preserved the teachings
of Peter their first bishop.
When heretics attack any doctrine of the church, the Pope ap-
points the most learned men of Eome to examine the teachings of
God in the Bible, the traditions of the church, the writings of
the holy fathers and all the traditions of Christianity in the fathers
who wrote the teachings of the apostles. The matter passes
through the college of cardinals, and when it is found in the
Bible and in the deposit of faith, then the Pope as vicar of Christ
publicly proclaims that it was taught by God, and that it is a
part of the constitutions of the church. He does not then man-
ufacture any new doctrines, but he proclaims the old held from
the foundations of the christian religion. Then Rome and the
whole world shine with a brighter lustre by the truths of God
revealed to the human race.
The judge, the president, the king may sin in their private lives,
and still be good rulers, or give correct decisions. For one is an
act of private life and the other a public act, and each is independ-
ent of the other. Yet when it happens, no one appears to say the
whole nation or the courts have gone to ruin nor the church fallen
into error when any clergyman falls away from the sanctity of his
state. The Pope therefore in his private life is like any other man,
liable to sin. For only Christ and his Mother lived free from sin.
But we suppose, that being surrounded by so many safeguards, the
Pope does not sin as much as others. But if he does, he has to
go to the sacraments like other men.
The office of the Papacy is then to define what God has re-
vealed to man as contained in the Bible and in traditions, and to
pronounce what actions are good and what actions are bad. Faith
dwells in the mind of man, and morals in the free will. The doc-
trines of faith revealed by God to the human race are proposed to
our belief by the church, as contained in the Bible, explained by
the traditions of the church, and in every historic monument of
the past. The Papacy, as head of the church, solemnly defines
that these principles of truths have been revealed by God to the
human race, and that they are contained in *'the deposit of faith." '
To be saved all men must believe these truths, and " He that bliev-
eth not shall be condemned. " ' The Pope then is the teacher of
faith and morals. But let us understand morals.
' 1 Tltn. vl. 30. « Luke xvl. 16.
WHAT IS A HUMAN ACT ? 185
Man, by nature a mineral, a vegetable, and an animal and an
intellectual being, he has many acts, which belong to these four
great divisions of creation, actions ruled by varied laws which God
made to rule this forefold orders of creatures. When man acts
unconsciously, not knowing what he does, his acts belong to the
rank of the creatures below him, who are not capable of sin, for.
they know not what they do. But when he acts deliberately,
knowing what he does, his acts are good, bad or indifferent. If
they are good, they have their reward, if they are bad, they carry
with them a punishment. When therefore a man acts, not know-
ing what he does, because of want of knowledge, from forgetful-
ness or want of thought, his act is like that of any animal, having
neither punishment nor reward. But when a man acts with in-
tention and attention, it is not an animal but a human act, for in
that case the mind and will, which are man's reasonable and an-
gelic faculties, take part in it, and it is good, bad or indifferent,
according to the intention and attention. A human act then is
good or bad according as it agrees or disagrees with the rules of
morals, that is with the laws which regulate mens' free actions.
We must first take into account the laws of natural right and
wrong, which the God of nature has written in our hearts, next
the laws which God revealed in the Bible and in holy tradition,
thus the laws which the church makes, and the laws which
the state, makes' for our guidance and for the temporal
welfare of mankind. These laws are universal and external
to us. Knowing these laws, we say to ourselves this action is ac-
cording to or contrary to reason, or to the law of God in revelation,
or to the church, or to the state. Then we conclude that we can
or cannot do it without breaking a law. Such are the reasonings
of the mind in every human act. That is a conclusion of con-
science. Thus conscience concludes and judges in all our human
acts relating to good and bad acts.
To the head of the church belongs the power and authority of
defining what are the good and bad actions of men. For while
good acts lead man to heaven, bad actions lead him to hell.
Therefore as the shepherd of souls redeemed by Christ the Church
through her head tells men the good and the bad actions. He is not
infallible in politics, in the natural sciences, in disputes among
men about historic facts, for his infallibility extends only to the
truths revealed by God to mankind, and to dogmatic facts con-
tained in the Bible and in holy tradition.
In making Peter and his successors head and teacher of the
whole church, Christ did not lower but rather crowned the whole
episcopal order, and placed as a light to mankind the great
See of Peter. The bishops who especially form the teach-
ing church, are not to receive their teachings from the priests
under them, but from their father over them, from that Bish-
op who has not only complete orders like themselves, but also
who made them by his ofiBcial appointment and who has the com-
186 WHAT IS A VIRTUE ?
plete jurisdiction over all the souls of Christ, to whom Christ said:
"Feed my lambs/' "Feed my sheep," " Confirm thy brethren."
The words of our Lord to Peter were: "Thou art Peter and up-
on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall
not prevail against it, and 1 will give to thee the keys of the king-
dom of heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall
be bound also in heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon
earth it shall be loosed also in heaven."' *'I have prayed for
thee Peter, that thy faith fail not, and that thou being once con-
verted confirm thy brethren." " Feed my lambs Feed my sheep,"
etc. By these words Christ made Peter the teacher of the faith
and of the morals of the christian church. He has the power of
opening and of closing heaven, of binding and loosening the con-
sciences of men, and of feeding Christ's sheepf olds and lambs in
all the dioceses and churches of the world. If the Pope, whom
in the person of Peter, Christ made the head of the church, would
teach error, then he would do so in the name of the Christ.
The Pope then is the teacher of the human race in the place of
Christ. He is the official interpreter of the Bible, the guardian
of the truths God revealed to the human race. These truths
are of two kinds, the revelations of faith and of morals. Faith be-
ing in the mind and morals in the free will the Pope enlightens
and strengthens these two angelic faculties, by which man rises
above, and is superior to animals, and by which he is like unto
the angels and like unto God. The Pope then is the divine-
ly appointed custodian of the faith and the morals of man-
kind.
But let us see what is faith. Faith is a virtue infused into our
souls by the Holy Spirit, inclining us to believe what he has re-
vealed as taught by the church. A virtue in a habit of acting
rightly. By often doing right we get so accustomed to doing so,
that it becomes easy to us. By doing wrong often, we soon get so
used to it that wickedness comes easy to us. Then a good habit
is a virtue, and a bad habit is a vice. We see then by experience
how we should ahva\"s do right and shun badness.
A virtue being an acquired habit of acting rightly, it is called a
natural virtue. But a virtue, which we did not acquire ourselves,
but which comes by the grace of God, is an infused virtue, be-
cause it com"es not from us or from nature but from God. Vir-
tues are again called moral or theological according to the object
towards which they tend. There are four primary cardinal na-
tural virtues, prudence, justice, fortitude and temperance, natural
to the heart of every man, and by which he controls his passions
and the beastly tendency of his nature to drag him down. But there
are three chief supernatural virtues implanted in the soul by the Holy
Ghost at baptism, which may be compared to three eyes or powers
given to man in addition to what he has from nature. They
tend to elevate him and to raise him to God. These can never be
> Matt. zn. 19.
NATUKAL AND SUPERNATUEAL FAITH. 187
acquired without the grace of God, as they have for their object
Ood the Supernatural, working above nature, although every man
has besides a natural faith, hope and love. Fallen man cannot
rise to God unless by and through his Son Jesus Christ, the Auth-
or and the source of grace, lifting mankind from earth towards
heaven.
Faith is the assent of the mind, because of the authority of the
teacher. It is of two kinds, natural and supernatural, inasmuch
as it comes from nature or from grace. If you set a dog to hunt
for a rat, he will hunt because he imagines that there is an animal
to be hunted even before he finds the animal to be killed. AVe be-
lieve that Alexander conquered an empire, altliough we never saw
him, because we believe what historians tell us. The dog will hunt
for the rat because his hunting instincts tell him to find him. We
labor each day because we hope to get our pay for our labor. The
animals love each other and their young, as the mother loves her
•childre!!. But these are only natural virtues implanted in nature
by the Creator for the good of his creation.
But tliere is another kind of faith, hope and love, which comes
from God the Holy Ghost, which still farther complete man, and
directs him on his way to heaven. They are found only in the chris-
tian. Their object is not the natural but the supernatual in the
other life. The object of faith is God and his words, truths re-
vealed to man. The object of hope is God and his rewards in
heaven. The object of charity is God himself and our neighbor
for the love of God. We believe what God has revealed because
Ood can neither deceive nor be deceived. We hope because of
God's goodness to us. We love him because of his goodness
and perfections in himself. We believe his truths, we hope in his
goodness and we love himself. Such are the virtues God implants
in us by his grace, the first fruits of our redemption. Thus God
bends down to us, making of our souls and bodies the temples of
his Holy Spirit, that by these supernatural virtues, he may lift us
up to himself. But faith, being the belief of things we see not
now, in heaven where we will see God and his truths face to face,
there will be no faith. Hope looks for the rewards of God in
heaven, and when we go there we will have no more hope, for then
we will have God himself, and live his own supernatural life. But
in heaven, charity will increase, because the goodness and the per-
fections of things inspire love, for we love not the deformed — there
in heaven, where our minds will bask in the streams of intellectual
light flowing forth from the face of the Eternal Son, where the Lord
the Holy Spirit will fill them with charity, the love of God above
will last during all the endless ages of eternity.
Faith then is a supernatural virtue, supernaturally implanted in
the soul, by which the mind fixedly believes all the truths which
the church proclaims that God has revealed to the human race.
We believe because of the authority of God speaking. Two
things force us to believe — first the authority of God — second the
188 THE OBJECT OF FAITH.
authority of the church, he founded to teach what he has re-
vealed. God spoke first by the prophets, and his revelations are
found in the Bible and in the traditions of Christianity. At last
in the fulness of time, his Son came, the greatest of the prophets,
resuming in his sacred Person, and fulfilling in his life, all prepa-
rations for his coming. Then he founded his church to teach all men
his revelations, to live till the end of time, so as to preserve clear,
uudefiled and unbroken, all the revelations and teachings of God.
The object then of faith is the truth of God revealed. Our
faith therefore is founded on the infinite wisdom of God, who can-
not be deceived, and on the truthfulness of God who cannot
tell a lie or deceive anyone. By the true faith then God is known
from all false gods, from paganism, which is the worship of de-
mons, from Mohammedanism, which rejects Christ and puts Mo-
hammed in his place as the last of the prophets, and from heretical
churches, which hold but a part of our holy religion, and which
reject other articles of God's revelation. Faith therefore is
founded on the wisdom of God, who knowing all things cannot be
deceived — and on the goodness of God, who wishes all men to be
saved, and to partake in his everlasting happiness in heaven.
By faith we believe in God and in the truths he has revealed.
But God can be known by two ways, naturally and supernaturally.
God is known naturally by the study of the world and its wonders,
its laws, its movements, its mathematical foundations and its laws,
which guide the movements of its varied non-living and living
beings. As the traditions of the Babylonians say, thus Abra-
ham first studying the stars, rose to a natural knowledge of the
Creator. Then God gave him a supernatural faith in him. First
he concluded that the universe was not made by the gods his
father made to sell to idolaters, but by some great Creator. But
this was only a natural faith, while the supernatural faith given
him later, and of which we write has for its object not only God in
nature, but a faith which comes from the grace of God infused into
the soul, inclining us to believe what God has revealed, because the
church proclaims his revelation to the human race. Therefore
all men, who have not been baptized, or who have not a supernatural
faith, and have only natural faith in what they know and have
learned, without this supernatural faith which God sometimes gives
as he did to Abraham, they do not believe what the church teaches,
for they have not the supernatural faith or grace of believing.
They are spiritually blind, they have not that eye of the soul,
faith, they are of the earth earthly, they cannot rise of themselves
above their nature, and they do not believe, for they cannot see.
The church is the teacher of the things God has revealed. She
is the organization founded by God to teach the world his revela-
tion, to guard his sacred truths, to proclaim his doctrines. We
believe because she tells us that God has revealed these things,
that these are found in the "deposit of faith, " and that they are
a part of the revelation of God to man. The Son of God founded
THE ACTS OF FAITH. 18&
the church before there was a Bible. Only at the III. council of
Carthage was the canon of the Holy Scriptures proclaimed,
and by a decree of the Bishop of Kome, the Bible was given to the
world as the inspired Book written by the Holy Ghost. The books
were then separated from the Holy books, which up to that time
had been held by the Jews and christians as the historical writings
both of the Old and of the New Testaments, then they were
separated from the authentic inspired books, and they are known
to-day as the Apocrypha, curious specimens of ancient literature.
The learned in religion may believe in one article of faith after
another, or the unlearned may say : I do not understand all the
church teaches, but I believe all she asks me to believe, although
I do not understand the reasons why. The clergy believe each
article of faith they study while the laity believe what the church
teaches. It is not then necessary for the laity to spend long
years in the study of the revelation of God. They have only to
believe what the church teaches in order to be saved. But as
the clergy must teach the laity, as they are the officials of the
church, they must know the doctrines of the church, that they may
teach others. But they do not teach their private ideas of the
Bible and of religion they only reflect the teachings of the church.
The body speaks by the head, the Bishop of Rome. He is the
Teacher of the church and the clergy teach what they know from
the Bible and tradition, under the supervision of the Pope.
In the catholic church then no priest or bishop preaches hi&
own private belief, or inflicts on the people his own peculiar notions.
The priest preaching, governing his parish, administering the
sacraments, and fulfilling his duties, follows the line of action laid
down for him by the church. He acts as the official of the church
bound by her laws, acting as her minister, as the religious agent of
the Redeemer. His doctrines, his decisions in confession, his
mode of administering his parish, his daily ministerial acts
were regulated for him by the church. From the church univer-
sal and from the diocese he gets these spiritual riches, and he
gives these holy things to the people, who belong not to him but
to Christ. Therefore the man is absorbed up into the priest, and
he preaches not himself but Christ and him crucified, the way of
salvation such as the Bishops of Rome have officially proclaimed as
revealed by God in the Bible, and in tradition.
We have said that the Pope is the teacher of faith and morals.
Morals are the doctrines relating to the free actions of men.
Religion dwells in the mind and will of man. Faith enlightens
the mind and lights up the intellect of man, with the truths
which God revealed to the human race. But morals are the doc-
trines which regulate the free will of man.
In Adam first made to the image and the likenes of his creator,
all his movements were subject to the light of reason. But in fallen
man passion rebels against reason, and when the will consents it
is sin. But the good of man required that certain laws be given
190 PfiOTESTANT SERVICES.
him to rule his acts, telling him what actions are good and what
are bad. God gave the primary principles of man's action in the
Ten Commandments and in many other parts of the Bible. It
then belongs to the Pope to define, what is good and what is bad
in the actions of man, to say what is and what is not sin, accord-
ing to the laws of God and the principles of virtues and of sins.
The reader then can see that the Bible was not written as a book
•of history, of science or of literature, but as a book of faith and
■of morals for the hu man race. The Lord appointed the head of his
church as the official expounder and explainer of that wonderful
book written by his inspired prophets and apostles*
Then when the people attend a Protestant church the minister
monies forth, gives out the hymn, which the choir sings, the min-
ister then preaches his private opinions of the meaning of the
Bible, again the choir sings and he dismisses them with liis bene-
diction. The members of the congregation go home with the idea
that they have worshipped God, when they have only listened to
the music, and to a private man giving them his private ideas of
what he thinks the text of the Bible means. But in the catholic
church, the priest is the minister of Christ. He renews in mystic
rites, in vast ceremonial the whole history of the human race, the
preparations for the coming of the Redeemer, the life and preach-
ings of Christ, the last supper, the crucifixion, the ascension, and
the preaching of the Gospel into the whole world. To the Eternal
J'ather the sacrifice of the cross is offered up on every altar,
and the atonement is renewed before the eyes of God and man.
Thus we worship the Godhead by and through his Son, immolat-
ed for the supernatural life of man. The priest preaches, not his
thoughts or his ideas of the Bible, but he proclaims the teachings
of the universal church. From the altar and from the jiulpit, you
hear the infallible doctrines, Miiich God revealed to man, as de-
fined by the heirs of Peter on the eternal throne of the Fisherman.
Then the Mass each Sunday is the sacrifice of God's Son, offered
up again to the eternal Father, that sublime mystery where all the
people gather, that prayer of the whole parish ascending up before
the everlasting throne of God, asking blessings on us all, giving
thanks unto almighty God, for his blessings in the past and seek-
ing for his benefits in the future. Well then among the oriental
rites the Mass is called the " Mystery," for it is filled with all the
wonderful mysteries of the prophecies, the life the coming and
the death of our blessed Saviour. The traditions of Rome tell us
that the services of the mass were substantially comj)osed by St.
Peter in the Latin tongue, while the other apostles composed like
services in the languages of the people to whom they went to preach,
and therefore even to our day, the holy mysteries are offered up in
various rites and languages, while we follow the Latin rite, establish-
ed by St. Peter, and beautified by his successors in the See of
Rome.
The Pope, then, the successor of Peter, the head of the church
192 THE CHURCH IS AN EMPIRE.
universal, is the interpreter of the bible, the guardian of the tradi-
tions, the definer of morals, the supreme court of the church, the
tribunal of last resort. To him alone belongs to say what God
has revealed to the human race, what actions are morally good and
bad, what is virtue, what is vice, what are sins and what are good
actions. The Bishop of Rome then is the teacher of faith and of
morals.
Jesus Christ is not only the teacher of mankind but he is also the
Lord of lords and the King of kings. He came to found a king-
dom, iiis cliurch, a spiritual empire extending to the uttermost
ends of the earth, embracing the whole human race for which he
died. In this the church differs from othei" governments. For
while governments rule, they do not teach their subjects, nor do
they feed them on the body and the blood of the ruler.
This kingdom of Christ was so clearly foretold by the prophets
of the Old Testament, that the Jews looked for a Prince of the
house of David, whom they thought would come and make them
political rulers overall the earth. They expected a civil temporal
kingdom, but not a spiritual empire of religion like the church.
Their minds, distorted by worldly wisdom, they refused to receive
the Son of God, born of the royal house of David and heir of Sol-
omon; they would have no king but Caesar, whose successors later
scattered them from their country and their home when they des-
troyed Jerusalem.
An empire is a perfect government of men, ruled by an emperor
with kings under him, partaking in this authority. In the ancient
world, we find striking images of the church, the spiritual empire
of Chri§t. The ancient empire of Babylon extended over the
plains of Mesopotamia, from which came Abraham called by God
to be the father of the Hebrews. But it was a kingdom of con-
quest and not of love and learning like the church. Alexander,
with the disciples of Aristotle, in the fourth century before Christ
went forth as a conquerer from Greece, spreading Grecian civiliza-
tion over the East of Europe, the North of Africa, the East of Asia,
preparing the nations for the spread of the Gospel later written in
Greek. The Romans began their conquests in the ninth century
before Christ, and they spread the Latin language wherever their
armies had penetrated. But these were empires of blood and of
carnage. Tliey were foiced on conquered peoples by the sword.
They subdued the bodies, but they left the minds of men still slaves
of error, bowing down before pagan idols. They were but feeble
imjiges of the church the empire of religion, founded by the Son
of God, not for the enslavement of men but for their delivery from
the chains of demons.
Thus while civil empires and Governments rule men, they con-
trol only their external actions. They ciinnot penetrate into the
minds of men, judge their motives, i)urify the heart, elevate the
mitid, deliver men from sin and sorrow or lead them up to heaven.
While earthly governments rule the civil actions of men, the churcb
THE COUNCIL OF NICE. 193
rules the souls of men. Man is composed of a visible body and of
iin invisible soul. Civil governments rule the civil actions of men
while the church rules the souls. These are the only two kinds of
authority in the world now ruling the human race. There is no
power but from God. The civil authority comes from God through
the people, while the spiritual government of the church comes
direct from Jesus Christ in jurisdiction given to Peter. The ex-
ercise of jurisdiction belongs to the Vicar of Christ, the heir of
Peter, to whom Christ gave the power of binding and of loosing
and of feeding his lambs and sheep. AVhence the traditions of
Christianity call the successor of Peter ** The Prince of the
Church;" " The Bishop of Bishops;" "the Supreme Pastor;"'
The Foundation Eock ;" "The Leader of christians ;" "The eternal
Monarch," of that vast empire of souls, washed in the blood of
the spotless "Lamb of God slain from the foundations of the world."
Let us see what apostolic tradition and the councils say of him.
In the year 325 met the bishops of the world in the memorable
council of Nice, the first meeting of the bishops since the days of
the apostles. The Arabic decrees, perhaps not authentic, but giving
the spirit of this famous council preserved in a remarkable manner
tell us that there the clmi'ch decreed: "He who holds the See
of Pome is the Head and the prince of all the patriarchs. Indeed
he is the first, like Peter, to whom was given power in all christian
princes, and over their peoples, so that he is the Vicar of Christ
our Lord overall peoples, and over the universal christian church,
and he who would contradict him will be excommunicated by the
council."' Here at the very first meeting of the whole church
which took place since the apostolic days, the church decrees the
supreme empire of the church over all princes and peoples with the
successor of Peter at the head. The first christian emperor Con-
stantine, clothed in the red vestments of the Roman emperors,
crowned with the diadem of the Caesars rulers of the world, there
at the further end of the hall, he sits opposite the legates of the
Pope. The first christian ruler of the whole civilized world takes
part in that first meeting of the whole church, where he hears and
agrees to a decree proclaiming the spiritual supremacy of the Heir
of Peter over the whole world over the nations, over the rulers and
over the clergy.
The other councils of the church proclaimed the same teachings
as the doctrine of Christ. The council of Florence decreed: "We
define that the holy apostolic See holds the primacy over the whole
earth, that the Roman Pontiffs are the successors of blessed Peter,
the Head of the apostles. He is the true Vicar of Christ, the head of
the whole church, the Father and the teacher of all christians.
To him in blessed Peter, our Lord Jesus Christ gave the full power
■of ruling and of governing the universal church."" Again the
council of Trent proclaimed: "Because of the supreme authority
• Mansi Arabic Decrees of Nice Tom. 11. col. 935. 2 concll. Flor.
194 THE CHURCH LIKE A MOAAJfCHY.
given them over tlie universal churcli, above all the Pontiffs have
reserved cases of great crimes to their own judgment.'"
In our day the V'atican council proclaimed" in striking words the
supremacy of the Bishop of Rome over the whole church: "11
any one should say the Roman Pontiff has only the office of in-
spection and of direction, and not the full and supreme power of
jurisdiction in the universal church, not only in things which be-
long to faith and morals, but also in these matters which relate to
discipline, and to the government of the church scattered through-
out tlie whole world, but that he has only the larger parts, but not
the fulness of this supreme authority, or that this his power is not
ordinary or direct in each and every church, or over all pastors
and faithful, let him be anathema."' The documents of every age
proclaim that the whole christian world held the doctrine of the
supremacy of the Roman church from the very days of the apostles.
Christ gave the form of a monarchy to the church constitution.*
To deny that would be contrary to the teachings of the church, for
it belongs to faith. Christ did not found the church, so as to ad-
minister it as a republic, where bishops and pastoi-s would be elect-
ed by the laity. For all power in the church comes down from
Christ the King to his clergy, and thus the authority of the clergy
comes not from the people up to them. But the church partakes
in the perfections of both the democratic, of the aristocratic and
of the kingly forms of governments. For the Popes and bishops de-
scend not from ruling families, the clergy have no children like the
priesthood of the old law, but they are elected to their offices by
ways which will be described farther on.*
The doctrine of the unity and the supremacy of the Roman See,
from the days of the apostles, was so impressed on the world from
apostolic days, that we have ever been called Roman Catholics.
That is Rome is the city and the See of the visible head of the
church, while catholic is the Greek for universal. We are one be-
cause of the one headship of the Bishop of Rome, and we are
catholic or universal, because the one universal church extends
to all parts of the world, and holds within her bosom every church
which teaches the faith of Christ. But the scattered churches are
all one, because they all come forth from and bow down before
the supremacy and power of the Roman church, the Mother of
them all.
In the holy Scriptures the church was foretold by the prophets,
and described by our Lord as the sheepfold, the kingdom and the
body of Christ. Peter became the shepherd of the lambs and
sheep of Christ, the confirmerof his brothers, the guardian of the
keys of heaven, the holder of the power of binding and of loosing,
the foundation on which the other churches rest. "Because of it»
higher principality, to this church every church must come, where-
ever are the faithful."*
' Concil. Trid. Sob. xIx. Cap. vll. * Concll. Vat. Sosw. Iv. Caput. Hi. ad flnem.
» Brev. PU vi. Super solid. * Bellarmln De Bom. Pontlf. L. I. et 111.
* St. Irenlus CoQtra Uaeras. L. 111.
COULD THE PAPACY BE TAKEN" FROM ROME ? 195
Each king and ruler has some central city, his capital, from
which he rules his kingdom. The cliurch being the Kingdom of
Christ on the earth it has its capital, the eternal city Kome where
dwells her earthly head. From her flow out all power and author-
ity of Jurisdiction into all the churches of Christendom. In a
kingdom the ruler appoints men under him, to rule distant prov-
inces and parts of his dominions. With him they rule. If the con-
stitution of the kingdom allow, he can at once take away that an--
thority from those he appointed to partake with him in it. But
while the bishops have their jurisdiction from the PontifE, the}'^
govern their dioceses in their own name, for they are the titular
bishops of their sees, while the Pope is the titular Bishop not of
their sees, but of the See of Peter, of the eternal city Rome.
We ask the question. Could the primacy over the whole church
be taken away from the city of Rome and attached to any other
city? "As Peter fixed his See at Rome and there he died, crowned
with a glorious martyrdom, if he did that by an express revelation
of God given especially to Peter, although depending on the will of
Peter, it happened that the supreme Pontificate remains adherent
to the Roman See, so that he who succeeds Peter, must also suc-
ceed in the primacy of Peter in tlie whole church.^" The whole
church without the Pope could not take' that primacy from Rome
and give it to any other see. But could the Pope himself do so?
"That cannot be easily decided,'" It is a disputed point among
authors. Few authors say, that if while living, the Pope should
move the See from Rome to another city, that there the Primacy
of Peter would rest. They claim that as Christ did not choose
Rome, but Peter, that not to Rome but to Peter he said: "Feed
my lambs Feed my sheep", therefore what Peter did in choosing a
see, his successors can later do.
But nearly all writers say that Peter chose Rome, that there he
died, and that from Rome must the Roman Pontiff take his title.
For if the Popes could change their See from Rome, civil govern-
ments would try to change the supreme Pontificate from Rome,
moved by political reasons, and the church would be disturbed.
All Popes ruled as Bishops of Rome. If they should change their
titles, doubts would arise regarding the successors of Peter, there
would be schisms and divisions in the church, for many would
claim that such a translation of the Roman See was contrary to
the very constitution of the church, which even the Pope cannot
change. The councils have often declared that the Bishop of
Rome holds the primacy in the whole church. The whole voice
of tradition tells us that. Whence we conclude that the Pope
cannot change his title as Bishop of Rome, and become the titular
bishop of any other city. That is why we are called Roman Cath-
olics. While the Popes may be driven from Rome for a time by
political or other causes, and history tells us that they were driven
• Benedict xiv. De Synod. Dieo L. ii. Cap. I. n. 1.
2 Idem De Primat. See. I. p. 19 p. m.
196 THE FIRST THREE CENTURIES.
many times from the eternal city, yet when the storm passes by,
they return again to the city of Peter.
History tells us that for the first three centuries, before a gen-
eral council of all the bishops could meet, the Bishops of Rome
ruled the universal church, and condemned false doctrines in
every part of the christian world. They oflBcially condemned Cel-
cius and Ebion, Avho in Asia Minor while St. John lived, taught
that Christ was not the Son of God but a man born of Mary. Why
did not St. John the beloved apostle condemn these heretics, in
place of leaving them to the judgment of the Bishop of Rome liv-
ing so far away, if he did not well know, that it belongs to the
heir of Peter to keep the faith?
Born in the East in the year 157 St. Ireneus came to Lyons,
France, of which city he became the first bishop. From there he
wrote: ''Because of its more principality, every church must come
to this church, all those who are of the faith, because in it the
traditions of the apostles is guarded." ' Then, giving the names
of the Bishops of Rome from St. Peter up to his time, he contiu-
ues: ''This is the ordination and the succession by which the
preaching of the apostles have come down to us."
St. Cyprian, who became bishop of Carthage in the year 248,
says regarding the heretics who went to Rome to deceive the Pope:
"They dare to undertake a voyage to the episcopal chair of Peter,
from whence the unity of the priesthood rises, bringing letters
from impius heretics, not thinking that they are the Romans,
whose praiseworthy faith was preached to them by the apostles." '
Again he writes:
" Who would leave the chair of Peter, upon which the church
was built?* "In his XLV. Letter he calls the Roman church
*' The mother and the root of all churches." In another place
he says that " Christ the Lord founded one church on Peter, which
in the reason and the origin of unity."* The unity of its origin
from the beginning, he disposed coming from this authority."
" Although from the resurrection, he gave an equal authority to
the apostles, that their unity might be evident, he so disposed
that the origin of that unity might come from one authority.
Really the other apostles were like Peter, equal partakers of power
and authority, but the begining comes from unity, that the
church of Christ might be shown as one." Thus from his words
tile Roman church is the bond of unity between all the churcliea
of the world.
In the Third century Aurelianus, the Roman emperor was at
Antioch, .where Paul, the former bishop of that city had been de-
posed because of his heresy by a synod of 70 bishops over which pre-
sided the patriarch of Alexandria. Domnus was elected in his
place. The former would not agree, and the bishops appealed to
the emperor. The emperor, knowing that no bishop could rule a
' Contra Haer. L, 111, Cap. Ill, * Epist. Iv. ad Cor. Papaio.
» De. Unit. Eccl. p. liM. Ed. Pam. ♦ EpIst. UxlU.
OLD TESTIMONIES. 197
ohurch unless he was in union with the Bishop of Eome, decided
that the bishops should write to the Pope. Thus the Bishop of
Rome was so well known in that age, that even the pagan emper-
or of Eome knew that he alone could decide the dispute.
St. Optatus who died in 384 says of the Donatist hereitcs:
" You cannot deny that you know Peter first placed the epis-
copal chair, on which sat Peter the first head of all the apostles,
whence he was called Cephas, by which one chair the unity of
all is preserved by all, lest the other apostles might each claim
supremacy, and now he would be a schismatic and a sinner, who
would raise another chair against it. Therefore there is but one
only chair, which is the first church with the notes (of the church)
in which first sat Peter, then Linus succeeded him, to Linus succeed-
ed Clement". . .here giving the names of the Popes to St. Siricius,
he continues: " who is our comrade, with whom we with the
whole world agree and form one communion." ' The same an-
cient writer says in another book: '•' Because of unity, the blessed
Peter merited to be preferred to the other apostles. ... A. chair
by which Peter belongs to us." "^
To Eusebius bishop of Versellens Pope Liborius wrote in 373:
" Most beloved brother, for the consolation of the present life,
let thy strong faith rise, by which thou followest the commands
of the Gospel, in no way differ from the union of the apostolic
See. "
St. Ambrose the great bishop of Milan, who died in 397, in-
vited a bishop to come and baptize his brother Satyrus, rescued
from a shipwreck. But fearing that the bishop might be a heretic
he wrote to him: " Are you in union with the catholic bishops,
that is with the Eoman church ?" In explaining the Psalms St.
Ambrose says " He is Peter to whom He said : ' Thou art Peter
and upon this rock I will build my church.' Therefore where
Peter is there is the church. Where is the church there is not
death but everlasting life." ' Preaching against the Novatians,
the same great father of the early church says : " Those who have
not the Seat of Peter have no inheritance of Peter, which by an
impius division, they tear assunder."*
The bishops assembled at Aquilia in 381 thus wrot* to Gratian
the emperor: " Beseeching thy clemency, lest the most holy faith
of the apostles might be disturbed, that is the Eoman church, the
head of the whole city of Eome. From him flows all rights of
that venerable communion."^
Before his death in 384 Pope Damasus wrote to Paulinus pa-
triarch of Antioch enclosing in his letter for him the chief articles
•of faith saying : " Let not scruples disturb thee, .... We have
«entour faith not only to thee, for thou art united with us in the
same belief, but to these whose names are written in it, that they
may be united to thee and to us through thee." ^ Damasus wrote
1 Lib. 11. con. Parmen. Cap. il. ^ Lib. vU. Cap. ill. ^ In Psalm, xl. n. .30.
* Operum St. Am. T. 11. col. 399. Benedict. * Lab. T. 11. col. 999 ed. Par. 1671.
< Eplst. V.
198 EARLY TROUBLES A.T ANTIOCH.
to the bishops of the East as given by Sozominus, these words:
*' As these disputes were agitated and the controversy increased,
the Bishop of the city of Rome wrote to the Oriental churches,
that they should consider the Persons of the Trinity as of one
nature, and honor them with equal glory, as do the bishops of the
West. That being done, the dispute ended by the judgment of
of the Roman church, and the question received its end." '
When in the IV. century many Arian bishops denied the divinity
of Christ, by the aid of the civil powers they took possession of
the churches of the Roman empire forcibly holding them, after hav-
ing driven out the bishops in union with Rome. On his election to
the throne, the Emperor Gratianus wished to restore these churches
in his vast empire to the catholic bishops, saying in his decree: "Let
the holy places be given to those who are in union with Pope Damas-
ns."^ Three bishops, Meletius, Paulinus and Apollinaris strove
for the episcopal see of Antioch. The priest Flavius, espousing the
cause ofhis bishop Meletius wrote to him saying: "Friend, if you hold
communion with Damasus, show us the likeness of his teaching." *
Paulinus had received letters of union from Pope Damasus, but as
he did not believe in the three Persons of the Trinity, Flavius
would not receive him saying: " Show us then your agreement in
his doctrine, and take the churches as the law lays down."* To
Apollinaris he said: " I am surprised at you, my friend, to see you
so impudently resist the truth , when you know that Damasus teaches
that he (Christ) was a perfect man, assumed by God. . . .Now at least
renounce the novelty, which 3'ou imagined. Receive the doctrine
of Damasus, and then you can receive the churches." * Prudentius
composed in the IV. century a latin hyrnn s. lowering down curses
on the Donatists, calling them schismatics and calling on them to-
hold only the faith of Peter's chair.
St Jerome, the great teacher of the early church born in the year
331, wrote about the apostles: "whence among the twelve, one was
selected as the head, so that the danger of any division might be
taken away." ' Writing to Pope Damasus he says: " Therefore I be-
lieve that it is well for me to praise the Chair and the faith of Peter
the precious pearl, where the body is there gather the eagles,
.... with yau alone remains uncorrupted the inheritance of the
Fathers, ... .1 follow no one but Christ, the first, and I unite witii
your holiness that is with the chair of Peter. Whoever outside this
house eats a Iamb is profane, who is not in this arch of Noe will
perish in tiie flood, I follow your colleagues of Egypt, .... I do
not know Vitalis, I spurn Meletius, I ignore Paulinus. Who does
not gather with thee scatters, that is he who is not of Christ is
anti-Christ the teachers of the Arians ask of me, a Roman, to
believe in three hypostases, Give your decision. If you please
I will not bear to say there are three Persons, .. Let me Know
with whom I am to communicate at Antioch," &c. Here we see the
> Lib. v1. Hist. Cap. JUdl. » Thodoretus Hist. L. V. II. » Theodor. Hist. L. 7 c 111.
* Ibidem. • Ibidem ' Adv. Jovlnn. 26.
TESTIMONY OF ST. JEROME. 199
most learned man in the early church, a man whom the great St.
Augustine wished to come and teach him the meaning of the dif-
ficult parts of the Bible, this great saint and doctor writes to Pope
Damasus for his infallible decree about the errors of the Arians,
and the disputes in the church at Antioch. While he lived in Syria,
preparing by a study of the Hebrew and of tlie holy places for his
great translation of the Bible into Latin, he wrote to Damasus:
" The church here is divided into three parts, each trying to draw
me into their faction. But I recognize only the ancient authority
of the monks. In the meantime I cry out. He who belongs to the
chair of Peter is mine, Meletius, Vitalis and Paulinus say they
adhere to you. If only one said so, I could believe him, but
I believe they are all lying. Therefore I beseech your Holiness
write to me, and tell me to whom I shall unite while I am in
Syria."'
St. Jerome lived at Bethlehem within the jurisdiction of the bish-
op of Jerusalem , who got into a controversy with Theophilus, patri-
arch of Alexandria. To the latter Jerome wrote in reply to a letter
he had received about these troubles: "I am much obliged for the
ecclesiastical cannons you draw my attention to. Nothing is dearer
to us than to keep the rights of Christ, nor do we go outside the
limits of the fathers. We always keep the Eoman faith, praised by
apostolic lips, and we glory in partaking in the church of Alexan-
dria."'* St. Jerome had translated some of the books of origin
from Greek into Latin, and Rufin wrote that the Latin reader would
find nothing in them against his faith. Jerome says: "The Latin
reader will find nothing in them, which differs from our faith. What
faith does he mean? Is it that belief which is found in Origin^s
books? Or rather that faith which the Roman church holds ? If
it is the Roman faith, then we are catholics, because we did not
give any error in translating Origin." ^
In the year 418 Pope Zozimus, writing to the bishops of Africa,
who were"then holding a council at Carthage. says: "The tradition
of the fathers gives such authority to tlie apostolic See, that no one
dares to dispute its judgment, for by the judgments of all, canon-
ical antiquity gives such power to this Apostle, so that by the
promise of Clirist, he could untie the bound and tie the free. The
same power is given to those who are the heirs of this See, for he
saying, they merited it. For because of where he sits, he has the
care of all the churches, nor does he allow any privilege to disturb
his golden sentence .... Whence therefore Peter is the head of
such power, which the study of our elders strengthens, that both hu-
man and divine laws and disciplines strengthen the Roman church.
It is not hidden from you that we have come into the power of rul-
ing in his name, for you know it, most dear brethren, as all priests
should know, nevertheless as such authority has come down to us
so that no one can dispute our sentence."* .... Here we see a
1 Editio. Benedict. Epist.xvl. T. 4 col. S2. ^ Ibidem 58 col. 597.
3 Apol. Adv. Ruf . L. I. * Lab. T. ii. col. 1572.
^00 ST. AUGUSTIN.
Pope in the V. century teaching all the bishops of the province of
Africa assembled in a solemn council.
The greatest doctor of tliat age Avas St. Augustin, the bishop
of Hippo, the greatest intellect which ever appeared on this earth.
Born in the year 354, his works have ilkmiined the world. Explain-
ing the Psalms against tlie Donatist heretics, he says: "Come,
brethren, if you wish to be grafted on the vine. We feel bad to
see you cut off and thrown away. Number the priests who have
sat on Peter's Seat and in their order you will see who succeed-
ed these fathers. She is the Rock against which the proud gates of
hell have not prevailed." ' In one of his letters against Generosus
he says: 'Tor if you consider the order of bishops succeeding each
other, how much more safely and certainly we number them from
Peter, to whom in the figure of the whole chuj-ch the Lord said:
"On this Hock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall
not conquer her. " " For to Peter succeeded Linus Clement to Linus"
then giving a list of all the Bishops of Rome to Siricius he con-
tinues: "Anastasius succeeded Siricius. In tliis order of succes-
sion no Donatist bishop is found." "^ When the bishops of that
part of Africa met at Carthage in 416 to condemn the Pelagians,
St. Augustin, who took an active part, wrote to Pope Innocent I.
in the name of the bishops: "This was done brother Lord, which we
have shown to your holy charity, that the statutes of our poor
abilities may have also the authority of your Apostolic See, in
order to guard the faith of many, and also to correct the evil of
others." '
The same year met the fathers of the council of Milevit, who
wrote to the same Pope: " Because the Lord in liis grace placed
the chief duty on the Apostolic See, . . .we beseech thee to deign to
take greater care of the weak members troubled with many dan-
gers." Then St. Augustin wrote to bishop Hilary to tell him
iibout the Pelagian heresy, and of the two councils already held in
Africa, saying: "A new heresy has risen against the grace of
Christ, and the church of Christ. But they are evidently not yet
separated from the. church. Now.while I am writing these things,
we know that an episcopal council in the church of Carthage has
issued a decree against them, by a letter directed to the venerable
Pope Innocent, and by direction of the council in Xumidia, we
have likewise written to the Apostolic See."* Innocent I. gave his
reply in the year 417. But as the letter is long we will give only a
few words from it: "Knowing what belongs to this Apostolic See,
when all know that those in this place wish to follow the apostles
from whom the whole episcopacy and the whole authority of this
name arises,.... that whatever shall arise or is done, in no matter
how far distant or remote the province, it should not be finally
defined, till the notice of it has first came to the knowledge of
this See, that the sentence may be pronounced with the strength
of this authority, whence other churches get theirs, from which all
1 In Psalm Con. Donat. 2 Eplst. 111. 8 EpLst. 175. 4 Eplst. 178.
THE MONAIiCH OF EELIGIOK. 201
other churches are born in different parts of the world, that they
may remain pure united to their head" &c.
' The early writers are filled with the proofs of the Primacy of the
Apostolic See over the other churches, but we cannot find space
for the texts. There sits in Rome the head of the universal church.
According to the constitution of the church her form of govern-
ment differs from other governments. For while other rulers
govern only in matters of public welfare, the church teaches both
matters of faith and morals. Whence the Roman Pontiff is both
the centre of faith and of government. All christians must believe
what God has revealed. The Pope is the teacher of the doctrines
of Christ the supreme court of the church the definer of her con-
stitution. The clergy and laity must obey the laws of the church
made for their good, because they compose the body of Christ,
which like all other organizations must be governed by law. The
bishop of Rome rules the whole church, because he is the visible
head of the visible organism. Such has been the ever living voice-
of tradition as seen in the writings of the fathers of the early ages.
The council of Ephesus, held in 431, says: "There is no doubt,.
yes, and it was known to all ages, that the holy and most blessed
Peter, the prince and the head of the apostles, the column and
the foundation of truth, from our Lord Jesus Christ received
the keys of heaven ....He lives and exercises judgment even to
our time in his successors." * The council of Chalcedon, held in
the year 451, decreed: "The holy and blessed Peter is the head of
the universal church .... Leo is endowed with the dignity of the ,
apostle Peter, who is the foundation and the rock of heavenly faith,
and he is called the janitor of the heavenly kingdom." ^
The principality of the Roman Pontiff over the whole church is
like that of a monarch of religion. Now every government mon-
arch or ruler has supreme power over the subjects. The nature of
this authority given to Peter was to guard the unity of faith, to
govern the whole church, that this supreme government in his
successors might be visible to all men. It was given to one man,
to one bishop to one who was to ever remain visible in his suc-
cessors sitting on that one supreme See. No other bishop or
meeting of bishops ever claimed that supreme power. The Bishops
of Rome have ever claimed that they received it from Christ,
through their predecessor Peter. The bishops of the universal
church never met till the beginning of the IV. century, yet we
find that far beyond that time, the Popes claimed universal do-
minion in religious matters over the churches and bishops of the
whole world, and the one who questioned their universal jurisdic-
tion Avas at once condemned by all as a heretic.
The supreme power in a nation not only makes but also ex-
ecutes laws and enforces them by punishments. The Bishop of
Rome then can not only make, but also enforce the laws of thfr
church. He does all things required for the unity of the church^
1 Apud Lab. T. Hi. col. 626 Pails 1671. 2 Lab, T. iil. Col. 1419 ed. 1671.
202 DID THE PAPACY COME FROM THE CJESARS'?
He defines what all must believe as revealed in the holy Scriptures
and in tradition and what laws shall be enforced. He can abrogate
all laws of the church, suspend them for some or enforce them for
others, punish with censures and with suspensions or excommuni-
cate those who disobey. To him belongs the power of taking
away the exercise of the powers of holy orders or of jurisdiction,
both in the case of cardinals, patriarchs, primates, archbishops,
bishops, priests and ministers. As the Vatican council declares,
he is the direct and immediate pastor of every soul redeemed by
Christ, for he is our Redeemer's Vicar. At all times during the
past ages they exercised this power of binding and of loosing the
€onsciences of men, by the laws they made or abrogated, when the
requirements of the times demanded a change in the policy of the
church.
The Bishop of Rome then has the supreme monarchial power
received from Christ, and he rules the whole church /is the Vicar
of Christ. The schismatic Greeks hold nearly all the doctrines
of the church, but they deny the supremacy of the Roman Pon-
tiff, giving him only a kind of honor or dignity among the other
bishops. Other schismatics hold that he has only an honorary
office, but no jurisdiction over the church universal, or tbat he sits
only as chairman in a council of the universal church. Accord-
ing to some he has certain powers over the church taken apart at
a time, but not over the church taken all together, so that at a
meeting of the bishops of the whole church, he is appointed by
them their chairman, but that when he is considered separately
from the bishops in council, he has no power which they did not
give him. Others say that he has no right to interfere in the reg-
ulations of the civil laws regulating divine worship, or that he
must follow the canons of the church made by his predecessors.
From these erronious doctrines many evils in modern times have
fallen on the cnurch, especially in Europe.
Members of other churches, not knowing history, try to make
out that the Popes got their power over other bishops and church-
es from the Roman empire. But they should remember that for
300 years, from the days of Sts. Peter and Paul, the pagan
empire of Rome persecuted the church and the pagans hated the very
name Christ, and put nearly all the early Bishops of Rome to death.
Up to the time of the conversion of Constantine in 310, two pow-
ers in Rome disputed universal jurisdiction. They were the civil
government, represented by the emperors, and the church, repres-
ented by the popes. The gates of hell rose up against the Bishops
of Rome, and fo'* centuries rivers of the blood of martyrs filled
the eternal city. The church at last washed paganism from the
face of the civilized world. When Constantine was converted, he
moved his Roman empire to the new city he founded on the site
of Bizantium, and called it Constantinople. There his Greeko-
Roman empire found a capital, till it was destroyed t>y the Turks
in the XV. century. But as history shows, the emperors of Con-
ALL BISHOPS LOOKED TO EOME. 203
stantinople were nearly always unfriendly to the Pope. It was then
impossible for the Bishops of Rome to derive their universal power
from an hostile and unfriendly power. No one can give what he
has not. and how could the civil power give supreme spiritual
authority to the Popes, when they never claimed that they had
that spiritual dominion themselves?
History proves this. When in the year 382 Nectarius was con-
secrated archbishop of Constantinople, the emperor Theodosius,
knowing that his jurisdiction would not be valid without the con-
sent of the Pope, sent his legates to Pope St. Damasus, asking
him to confirm the election.' AVhen in 449 Anatolius was elected
to the same see of Constantiople, Leo the Great refused to receive
him into the communion of the church, until he had made his
profession of faith before the legate of the Holy See, sent to Con-
stantinople for that purpose.'' When Maximns, contrary to the
canons, ascended the patriarchial see of Constantinople, both
clergy and laity refused to obey him, because his election was not
regular. And when the council of Chalcedon met, the bishops
asked the legates of the Holy See to confirm his election, which
they did. In the tenth session of that council, they decreed that
the acts of the council would be valid only relating to the bishop
of Antioch, before the Pope had received it, because Pope Leo had
judged him worthy, and had received him into the communion of
the church.^ In the year 48^, when John had been consecrated
archbishop of Alexandria, he asked the confirmation of Pope Sim-
plicius, who replied to Acacius, that as it had been related to him
that Timothy, archbishop of Alexandria was dead, and that John
had been elected by the votes of the clergy and laity, he would
therefore confirm his election and consecration, although the
emperor had falsely accused him of the crime of perjury. When
at the death of Acacius Flavitas was elected to his see, he re-
fused to ascend his patriarcheal throne of Constantinople, till he
had received the consent of the Bishop of Eome. That was not the
custom at that time, for the Popes had before conceded, that as
soon as any one was elected to an episcopal throne, he should at
once take possession of his cathedral, and then send to Rome for
the confirmation of the Pope. Felix at once confirmed his election.
When in 490 Enphemiuse, became archbishop of Constantinople,
Pope Felix refusing to confirm his election. Even when a syond
of bishops was called on the matter, the letter of the Pope was
read to the bishops refusing to receive him into the communion of
the church.
The Popes exercised their powers as rulers of the church in va-
rious parts of the East. Thus Pope Gelasius wrote in 492 that
the Holy See ''had deposed Timothy of Alexandria, Peter of
Antioch, Peter, Paul and others", not only once but often when
they presumed to exercise their sacerdotal power without the
' Epist. Rom. Pont. Col. 1043. ' Opera Leonis Mag. T. I. col. 1149.
^ Ses. 10 Concll. Calched.
204 EARLY APPEALS TO ROME.
authority alone of the apostlic See. So says the letter of St,
Gelasius. Damasus likewise deposed Flaviauus, patriarch of
Antioch. Pope St. Agapitus deposed Anthimus of Constanti-
nople, and in his place he ordained Massilles.' He djd this against
the vehement protests of the emperor, and of many powerful
princes, because the former had obtained the episcopal see by
gifts, being therefore guilty of the crime of simony. Sixtus III.
deposed Polychronins, bishop of Jerusalem, while Pope Nicholas^
1. enumerates oight patriarchs and archbishops of Constantinople
deposed by the Roman Pontiffs. In 254 Basilides appealed ta
the Bishop of Rome against a provincial council of the bishops of
Baetica, which had deposed him, and Pope Stephen restored
him to his see. St. Julius 1. restored St. Athanasius to the
see of Alexandria, Paul to Constantinople, and Marcellus to
Ancyranus; when they had been deposed by Oriental councils.
St. Leo restored Theodoret to his see whom the second
council of Ephesus had deposed. When the ecumenical council of
Calchedon met, the first act of all the assembled bishops of the
world was to call: *' The most Rev. Bishop Theodoret to take
part in the council, because he had been restored to his epis-
copacy by the holy Archbishop Leo '' then Bishop of Rome.
From the days of the apostles members of the church
aggrieved by the acts of pastors or of bishops appealed to
Rome, the highest court in the church, to restore them to their
rights. Thus in 142 Marcion, excommunicated by his bishop in
Pontus, appealed to Rome to be restored and absolved, a&
Epiphanius says." In 205 Montanus, Florianus and others con-
demned by the courts of their dioceses, appealed to Pope Zephirin
to be restored to their churches.* Towards the year 251, bishop
Privatus, condemned by a council at Carthage, appealed to the
Holy See against the action of the council. In 252 Fortunatus
and Felix of Africa, condemned by St.Cyprian, crossed the Medit-
erranian sea to lay the matter before Pope Cornelius. In 254
bishops Basilid and Martial, deposed by the provincial synod of
Baetica appealed to Pope Stephen, who restored them to their
churches. In 342 St. Athanasius and otlier bishops deposed by
two synods held at Ephesus appealed to Julius I, who called
them and their accusers to Rome, that the cases might be settled
by the Holy See. The Arianian bishops, who had condemned
them, refused to come to Rome, and Pope Julius restored them
to their dioceses, calling the Arianian bishops sycopliants. To-
wards the year 350, a presbyter Pistus, condemned by the council
of Nice appealed to Pope Julius. In 401 the great St. Chrystora,
patriarch of Constantinople, was deposed by Theophilus of Alexan-
dria, whom the bad empress Eudoxia had turned against him.
He appealed to Innocent who commanded both to come to Rome
to be there judged.* In 417 Patroclus bishop of Orleans ap-
» Llberatus Brer. C. xxl. p . 147. * Haeresl. xlU.
* Cbrbt Lup. de Rom. Ap. T. L p. 882. * Am. Cyclopedia Cbrystom,
THE POPES REPLIED TO APPEALS. 205
pealed to Pope Zozimus against the sentence of Proclus bishop
of Marseilles and against the sentence of a council of bishops held
in that city. In 418 Briccius, bishop of Tours deposed from his
diocese by a provincial council, apppealed to Pope Zozimus.
In the same year Coelestius, a presbyter excommunicated by a
council of Carthage, appealed to Zozimus. Marius an intimate
friend of St. Augustin tells us that he " believed that he appealed
to the examination of the Roman Bishop." To the same Pope
appealed Tuentius a presbyter of Gaul. In 427 many bishops
and clergymen whom Nestorius condemned in a synod appealed
to Rome.' About the year 449 Theodoret bishop of Cyren,
Eusebius of Dorelen, and Flavins bishop of Constantinople ap-
pealed to Pope Leo the Great, against the sentence of the illegal
council of Ephesus deposing them saying : ''We wait the sen-
tence of your apostolic See. For that most holy See has the
principality over all the churches of the world. "^ In 450 Eutyches
appealed to St. Leo.^ To the same Pope appealed the archdeacon
Aetius of Constantinople.* To the same Pope appealed bishop
Lupicin, deprived of his diocese by a synod of bishops in Maurit-
ania. Replying to the bishops who deposed him, the Pope says :
'' We command you to hear the case of bishop Lupicin, and we
restore him, asking so many times to be restored to communion^
Because he brought the case before us, we do not think it right,
to suspend him from communion while the case is being tried.*'
Chilidonius, deposed from his diocese by Hilarius of Aries, ap-
pealed to St. Leo, who restored him to his rights in the church.
To the same Leo appealed Sabianus and Leo, priests of the dio-
cese of Narbon suspended by Rusticus, bishop of that diocese. But
they did not prosecute their appeal, because in Leo's letter to Rus-
ticus, the Pope said that they did not act in good faith, and the
Pope left them to their bishop to deal with them as he saw fit.*
In 526 Acasius patriarch of Constantinople, suspended and de-
posed Salomen a presbyter of that city, who at once appealed to
Pope Felix III. who restored him to his rights, sending a letter to
the clergy of the diocese. Towards the year 535 a council of
bishops deposed Contumeliosus and condemned him to a mon-
astery. He appealed to the apostolic See, and Pope Agapitus
replied to the bishop: '' Having appealed to the apostolic See,
he wished an examination." Towards the year 558 a number of
priests of the diocese of Aries appeared against their bishop to
Pelagius I. When Katalis deposed Honoratus, an archdeacon,
Gregory the Great, elected in 590, restored him to his office, and
in the two letters which the Pope wrote to Natalis, he threatens
him with the punishment of being deprived of the pallium and
with excommunication.'' So many appeals were heard coming
from all parts of the church after the time of Gregory the Great,
that we have not the time to give them. They all show
1 St. Coelest. Epist. xlx. ^ Epist. Coelest. cxvi. ^ Lab. Concll. T. Iv. col. 10.
* Ibiden T. Hi. col. 1.341. s Concll. Lab, T. lii. col. 1.594.
' Concll. Lab. T. ill. col. 1404. ' Epist. ad Joannem Just.
206 VICARS OF THE POPE.
the authority and supremacy of the Popes, over the bishops
and councils of the church, so that from that time there rests
not a doubt of the power of the Popes over the whole church.
The Popes in the early ages appointed certain clergymen as
their vicars in all parts of the church. Leo the Great appointed
Anastasins, bishop of Thessalonica, his vicar overall the churches
•of the East. And because he M-as the vicar of the Pope numer-
ous clergymen remained at Thessalonica, till the council of
•Sardonica made a law that strange clergymen, who came from
:all parts of Greece should not be received from other dioceses.'
lieo also appointed Pontentius his vicar over the churches of Af-
rica. ' When the case of the heretic Nestorius, patriarch of Con-
stantinople came up. Pope Celestin appointed Syril of
Alexandria as his vicar to govern the diocese of Constantinople
while the case was being heard; Nes^orius being in the mean-
time deposed by the Pope. When Pope Gelasius suspended tlie
Archbishop of Alexandria, he appointed Acacius, patriarch of
Constantinople to rule the vacant church of Alexandria. He then
wrote to the bishops of Dardania: " Why did not Acacius refer the
matter to the apostolic See, from which he received the care of
these regions? " Pope Hormistas appointed bishop Sallustius his
vicar over the churches of Spain and of Portugal. Gehisius nomi-
nated Vergilius, bishop of Aries, as his vicar over the churches of
France reserving to himself the most important cases.'
Being the supreme legislator of the universal church the Pope
can make laws for the whole church, and dispense in all laws and
enactments made either by himself or by his predecessors. In the
year 443 Leo the Great wrote to all the bishops of the world re-
garding discipline and the laws of the church. * • The same Pope
wrote to Julius, archbishop of Aquilia, directing him to quickly
and carefully put in force all things required for the good of re-
ligion. He also wrote to Dorus bishop of Benevent, accusiug him
of not keeping the church laws, but of wilfully trampling on them.
He wrote to the bishops of Sicely forbidding tliem to give, sell or
alienate the properties of the churches, without the consent of all
the clergy, " because," he says, ** it is not for the prosperity of the
church." ^ He made two laws for the church at Alexandria, which
he sent to Dioscorus, patriarch of that city, saying: "This also
we wish you to follow."* In the year 405 Pope Hilary decreed
in the council of Rome: ** No one can stand without danger
unless he keep the divine constitutions, or the decrees of the
a,postolic See." ^ When Gregory the Great conceded certain priv-
ileges to the monastery of St. Medard, he added to the decree:
" If kings or bishops violate the decrees of this, our apostolic au-
thority, they will be deprived of their honors.'*'
The Popes in every age used their power of dispensing in the laws
of the church. Gelasius I. wrote to the bishops of Lucania: " We
• St. Leo Eplst. Ixxxlv. " Leo Eplst. Ixxxvll. ' Mb. Iv. Eplst. 111.
« Condi. \ja\>. T. 111. col. ISM. » Lab. T. 111. rol. 143Rand 1440. * Eplst. Lelnls L Ixxxl.
» Lab. T. Iv.col. 1060. • L»b. T. v. col. 15»4.
THE EARLY POPES INFLICTING CENSURES. 207
are forced by the times to give dispensations, we unite in the
moderation of the apostolic See to annul the decrees and canons
of our fathers, and to mitigate the decrees of our predecessors " &c.
Gregory wrote to Felix Bishop of Sicily, that he had dispensed
the Eiiglish from the impediments relating to marriage within the
forbidden degrees, saying that he did the same regarding the peo-
ple of Sicily. These impediments had been enacted and formulated
by the first general council of the whole church held at Nice in
the year 325. '
The Popes inflicted the punishment of censures on the guilty
members of the church in all ages. Pope St. Victor, who was
elected in the year 192, threatened to excommunicate all the
bishops of Asia unless they celebrated the feast of Easter on Sunday
according to the custonis of the Roman Church, '^ although
St. John the Evangelist had established the custom of holding it
on a week day, the same as ihe Jew?. At the earnest request of
St. Irenius, St. Victor did not put the punishment into execu-
tion. St. Innocent I. excommunicated the Emperor Arcadius and
his empress Eudoxia for their sins, using these words: " Therefore
I the least and a sinner, to whom the throne of the great apostle
was given, 1 separate thee and her from partaking of the mysteries
of Christ our God. And the bishop or clergyman who will dare
to administer them to you, from the hour when they will be bound
by these my letters, I will degrade from his dignity." ^ Pope In-
nocent excommunicated the emperor of Constantinople, and for-
bade any clergyman to administer to him the sacraments. Gregory
III. excommunicated the emperor Leo. Nicholas I. excommunicated
Lotahrius the king, and Waldrada the bad woman with whom he was
living in sin, as well as the archbishops of Cologne and of Treviren.
The Popes exercised their supreme powers over the whole church
in thecases of public sinners, when their crimes disturbed the church
and they did that regardless of the positions they held. No rank
in church or state was independent of their powers as Vicars of
Christ.
The Pope being the rnler of the kingdom of God, he can dis-
pense in all laws and exactment made by the church by his prede-
cessors, for the equal in power can take away what his equal did.
But no Pope can ever dispense, abrogate, nullify or interfere with
the divine constitution of the church. That comes from God, and
only God can change it and not the Pope, or all the bishops or
powers of the world, for they too must obey the laws made by God
in the Bible. The people of a nation can change their laws, annul
and modify their statutes, and that they do every year in legisla-
tures and in parliaments. They can even change their constitutions
or change from one form of government to any other. But by these
continual changes of politics, nations fall, and from their ruins rise
other nations and other people, for they are built on the moviiig
sands of human policy and of politics. But the divine elements ia
1 Lib. xil. Eplst. xxxi. ^ Eusebius Hist. L. V. c. xxiv. 'Epist. ad Arcadius.
208 UKDER CHRIST BUT OVER THE CHURCH.
the church, her constitution coming down from God to us are
found in the words of God in the Bible and in tradition, and no
power on earth can change them. The Pope is bound to follow
the divine constitution of the Church, for in it he finds the laws
and the enactments determining his lines of action. They come
from God, his Superior, and in the acts of his Master Jesus
Christ he cannot interfere. He stands under these divine enact-
ments as the whole church lives under the laws he or his
predecessors made for the guidance of the whole church.
The Pope then is under the laws of Christ, the bishops are un-
der the laws of Christ and of the Popes, the clergy and laity are
bound by the laws of God of the Popes and of the bishops. Thus
God governs his kingdom by laws which Christ the Popes and the
bishops enact for the spiritual welfare of the church the empire
of religion.
DIVINITY BUILDING OF THE CATHOUC UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON D. C.
The First Bishops of Rome
OME has ever been the cen-
tral sun around wliich
circled all other dioceses,
churches, parishes and
clergymen, all receiving from her
Pontiff spiritual light, power
and strength. Every civilized
nation on the face of the earth
traces back its culture and free-
dom to Kome and to her bishops.
Like pillars of fire, burning
with the light of the Holy Ghost,
the Popes have stood the teach-
ers of Christendom, From them
the clergy, the bishops, the
kings, the rulers, the statesmen
received their spiritual light and guidance, for the Lord^s Vicar
stands as a light-house guiding all mankind, for like him they are
the '• light of every man who cometh into the world." ' We will
give the chief historic facts of the Popes for the first six centuries
of the early church, showing in a surprising manner, the suprem-
acy and authority of the Bishops of Rome over the churches of
the world at that early date. We regret that we cannot give the
complete history of the Pontiffs for that would require an entire
book.
J John i. 9.
MASS IN THE CATACOMBS DURING THE PERSECUTIONS.
LINUS, CLETUS AND CLEMENT. 211
The Popes have been the teachers of mankind, of peoples and
of nations, not only in a spiritual, but also in a worldly point of
view, because from them the whole civilized world derived the
fundamental knowledge of the rights of man, freedom from
oppression and modern civilization. At Caesarea Peter met and
converted a young man named Clement, who waited continually
on Sts. Peter and Paul. Coming with the former to Eome, he-
became his vicar general and ruled the church in his absence. '
Tertulian tells us that Peter consecrated him a bishop, so that in
the very days of the apostles, the Roman diocese had bishops be-
longing to her clergy. On the death of the two great apostles,,
Clement was elected to the See by the votes of the clergy and peo-
ple, " but he declined the honors, and Linus was selected in his-
place.
Born in Etruria, Linus had written a history of the reign of
Peter. In G6 or 67 he was elected in his place. He ordered that
women should enter the church with their heads covered, a cus-
tom which prevails to our day. Having great power over de-
mons, he delivered the daughter of Saturninus from their vexa-
tions, and converted her to the faith. For this Saturninus put
him to death. He had reigned over eleven years. He was buried
near the bodies of Sts. Peter and Paul on the Vatican hill.
In the year 78 Cletus son of Faustinus on the Celian hill of a
noble family became Bishop of Eome. He reigned during the
government of Vaspasius and Titus, who had destroyed Jerusa-
lem and captured the Jews and carried them to Rome in chains.
During Peter's life he was a great Avorker and divided the city
into seven districts. lie was one of the chief officials of the Ro-
man diocese. By Peter's direction during the life of the Prince
of the apostles, he divided Rome into twenty-five districts with a
priest attached to each. This was the origin of parishes, first
founded by St. Peter himself. The pastors of these parishes are
the chief officials of the Roman church. In later ages the parish-
es of Rome were divided and augmented, so that there are now
many more parishes with titular pastors. Cletus first used the
words '' Health and Apostolic Benediction." After reigning
twelve years he was put to death by the impious Nero and buried
near the body of St. Peter.
Clement who before had declined the Chair of Peter although
consecrated a bishop by St. Peter after his conversion from Ju-
daism, now became bishop of Rome. He is called by many an
apostle.* St. Paul says that his name is in the book of life."
He was held in great esteem by the apostles and christians of
Rome while acting as the vicar general of St. Peter in his absence.*
In this early day a trouble arose, which has more than any other
disturbed the discipline of the church, the desire of changing pas-
tors. At Corinth the people rose up against their priests and de-
' Epiphaniiis HaB. 27. C 6. ^ Tertul. Prescr. C. 32.
=* Butler's Lives of the Saints. Nov. 23d. "• Phil. Iv. 3.
^ Epiphanlus User. 27 C.
212 ANACLETUS, EVABISTUS AXD ALEXANDER.
sired to change them although they were good priests. From
Rome, Clement addressed them an epistle, among other things
stating that the laity could not either appoint or change their
pastors. He wrote many epistles, which became famous in the
early church, ranking next to those of St. Paul in the New Tes-
tament. He wrote them in the name of the Roman Church, and
as some think in the days while the apostles Peter and Paul lived.
This shows what the authority of the Roman Church was in the
very days of the great apostles. Fortunatus, mentioned by St.
Paul, had come from the unfortunate church of Corinth to Rome
to seek from the head of the church at Rome spiritual doctrine and
medicine, to heal the divided factions of that Greek city. Pope
dement dispatched at once four messengers to the Corinthians
with his first letter. ' In his third and fourth letters, he extols
virginity above married life. He was put to death in the year 100
in the third of the reign of the emperor Trajan.
In the year 100 Pope Anacletus ascended the throne and
ruled the universal church, while Trajan ruled the Roman Em-
pire. He was born at Athens, then famous for learning. He
ruled with great wisdom. He decreed that every bishop should
be consecrated by not less than three bishops, that the clergy
should be publicly ordained in the church by their own bishop,
and that after the consecration of the Mass all present should re-
ceive Holy Communion. He built a tomb over the body of St.
Peter on the Vatican hill, and set apart a cemetery for the burial
of bishops. When martyred his body was buried on the Vatican,
near the tomb of St. Peter.
St. Evaristus followed him as the successor of St. Peter. He
was born in Greece, of a Jewish father, but he was educated in the
best schools of Athens. He gave the titles to the chief churches
of Rome, and appointed the chief priests of the Roman clergy as
pastors of these churches, and the pastors of these churches ever
afterwards bear the titles of the churches over which they presided.
He is the author of the titles of the lower clergy all over the
world, by which they are appointed to work in a particular church
or diocese in place of being wandering missionaries. He also or-
dained, that when the bishop went to preach, he should be at-
tended by seven deacons, in memory of the seven deacons ap-
pointed by the apostles. " He commanded, that from a])ostolic
tradition, marriage should be entered into not secretly, but pub-
licly contracted before the church unless for some grave reason,
and that the contracting parties should receive the blessing of the
pastor. This was the origin of the Nuptial Mass. He too died a
martyr's death and was entombed near the Prince of the apostles on
the Vatican in the year 112.
The clergy and Roman people then elected Alexander. In re-
membrance of the passion of our Lord, he commanded that at
Mass these words should be said: '* Who the day before he suf-
> Butler's Lives St. Clement Nor. 23. ' AcU. vi.
8IXTUS A.ND TELESPHOKE. 213
fered, took bread in his holy and venerable hands, and raising his
eyes to thee, God, his almighty Father, giving thee thanks, he
blessed it, broke it, and gave it to his disciples saying: 'Keceive
ye all of this. ' " He regulated the amount of bread and wine
which should be used in celebrating Mass, so as to prevent abuses;
he directed that at mass water should be added to the wine in mem-
ory of the water which flowed from the side of our Lord; he ordained
that when the clergy blessed holy water that they should use salt,
and that this holy water could be used with prayer in all places
against the power of the spirits of darkness. A great preacher
and orator, under his eloquence many noble Romans became
members of the church. Many of his converts were the senators
or belonged to the first families of Rome. For this reason a per-
secution rose against him, and he was arrested, accused of being a
christian and put to death with the most horrible sufferings.
Sixtus I. took his place. He was a Roman born in the Wide
Way, one of the seven regions of the eternal city well knowing
the people and clergy of Rome. In his reign paganism, purified
from the gross forms of mythology took the form of agnosticism
which divided into many branches. The materialists claimed that
matter is eternal; the pantheists that matter is God; the dualists
that good and evil are eternal principles, while many held that
matter emanates by the work of inferior creators from one infin-
ite principle. These errors rose first in the schools of Alexandria,
which from the times of the Ptolemies had become the centre of
ancient learning. These false teachings modified in many ways,
led to a persecution of the christians, and paved the way for the
errors of Arius, who in the fourth century denied the divinity of
Christ. One of the last victims of this persecution under the
emperor Adrian was Pope Sixtus, who was put to death in 128,
after reigning 10 years. Before his death he decreed that only
the clergy should teach holy things; he added to the Mass the
" Sanctus ", and ordained that bishops who had been called to
Rome, should not return to their sees, till they had received let-
ters from the Holy See in form of greetings to their people.
Telesphore, a monk ascended the Throne of Peter in 128.
About this time this Pope ordained that they alone should pre-
side over the meetings of the christians in the catecombs; tliat
the clergy should be ordained about Christmas and Trinity and be
consecrated bishops to take the place of the martyred pastors.
He regulated the forms of divine worship; he appointed bish-
ops all over the chief cities of the world, and divided the ecclesi-
astical year into the seasons of Advent, Lent, &c., according to the
customs of the apostles. St. Telesphore commanded the seven
weeks of Lent to be held each year before Easter, that Mass should
be celebrated at nine in the "morning, and ordered the angelic
hymn " Gloria " to be said at Mass.
The holy city of Jerusalem, laid waste by Titus and Vaspasian
was rebuilt by orders of Adrian. The stones of the ruined tern-
314 HYQINUS, PIUS, AND ANICETUS.
pie were used to build a theatre; over one of her ruined gates was
erected a marble hog, an animal detested by the Jews as un-
clean; a statue of Jupiter Avas set on the site of the holy sepulchre
of our Lord, and another of Venus on Calvary, and the Jews pur-
chased with money the privilege of weeping over the destruction
of their city on the anniversary of its capture. Only gentiles
were allowed to live in the restored city. To weaken the proph-
esies of the Lord in tiie Old Testament, the Jews then began the
composition of the Thalmud, a compilation of foolish oral tradi-
tions, a book which has blinded them to our day. After ten years
of a glorious reign St, Telesphore died a martyr's death in 142. '
After the martyrdom of Telesphore in the year 142, Hyginus
was placed in the Chair of Peter. Lender his reign, Cerdo came
from Syria to Rome, and began to preach that there were two
Gods, one rigorous and severe, the anchor of the Old Testament,
the other good and merciful, the author of the New Testament
and the Father of Christ, who sent Christ to redeem mankind
from the punishments of the first god. According to him Christ
was not really born of the Virgin Mary, neither was he a true
man, being such only in appearance. Hyginus at once condemned
him, cut him off from the church, and condemned his teachings.
The heretic imposed on Hyginus with signs of conversion. He was
afterwards received into the church, but continuing to preach his
errors secretly, he was again excommunicated. Another, Valin-
tine, jealous, because he was not elected a bishop in Egypt, came
to Rome and revived the errors of Simon Magus. He too was con-
demned for his errors by the mild Pope Hyginus, who died in 142.
In 158 Pius I. was selected in his place. He belonged to
Aquilia, and had been made a presbyter of the Roman church be-
fore his election. This was the first time that any clergyman
from another diocese had been incorporated into the diocese of
Rome. Before his time many of the christians celebrated Easter
during week days as the Jews, but this Pope ordered that for all
future time the feasit of the resurrection of our Lord should be
held only on Sundays, reversing the discipline established by St.
John the Evangelist. He changed the house of tlie convert Pra-K-
edis into a church, in which he used to celebrate Mass and gave it
the title of a pastoral church.
Anicetus succeeded him. Soon after his accession he com-
manded that the clergy should shave their beards, and forbade
them to wear their hair long. Having been a native of Syria, he
brought many of the customs of Palestine to Rome and introduced
them to the clergy and laity of the imperial city.
Soterus began his reign in 175. He ordained that virgins, nuns
and deaconesses should not touch the holy vessels or vestments
of the church, that incense should be used in the services of the
church, and that all present at the Mass should receive Holy Com-
munion on Holy Thursday unless guilty of mortal sin.
» Dairas Hist, of the Church, Vol. I. p. 108 &c.
ELEUTHERIUS, ZEPHYRINU8, CALIXTUS AC. 215
Eleiitherius his immediate successor ascended the throne in 182.
A native of Greece, Pope Anicetus had ordained him a deacon of
the Roman church before his death. He ruled the church uni-
versal during the reign of emperor Comodus. In the beginning
of his pontificate he sent letters to Lucius king of the Brittany ( a
part of France) humbly asking that he would treat well the
christians in his kingdom. Afterwards he sent the pious and holy
men Fugatius and Damianus into Brittany, where they converted
both the king and nearly the whole kingdom. During his time the
great Ireneus bishop of Lyons, France, came to Eome and was be-
nignly received by this Pope. The church then enjoyed great
tranquility and the faith spread with great rapidity all over the
world, lie was succeeded by St. Victor, of whom we find little
relating to the universal church.
St. Zephyrinus who reigned in his stead began the government
of the church in 203. He ordered that those who were to be
raised to holy orders should be ordained only at the quarter tenses
or the four seasons, and that the imposition of the bishop's hands
should take place publicly before the whole clergy and people of
the church; that only men noted for their piety and learning
should elect the candidates for holy orders. He directed that
when the bishop pontificated, all the clergy should be present. He
commanded that no patriarch, primate, or achbishop should pro-
nounce any sentence against a bishop, till they had received the
authority of the Papal See. He was put to death under Antoninus
and buried on the Appianian Way, in the cemetery of St. Calix-
tus, who was elected in his place.
Pope Calixtus enacted a statute, that according to the Jewish cus-
tom, the four seasons of the year should be officially consecrated by
prayer and fasting in the churches. They are called the ember-days
or the quarter tenses. He beautified and enlarged the old ceme-
tery on the Appianian Way, which bears his name, and he buried in
it the remains of numerous martyrs. He built the historic church
across the Tiber and dedicated it to the Mother of Christ. He
was put to death in the year 217 under the reign of the emperor
Alexander.
In 223 Urban succeeded Calixtus. It was the third year of the
reign of the emperor Alexander. Then the church enjoyed peace
in the Roman Empire. In his letter toValerianus and Tiburtius,
he laid down the principle which the whole christian world has
since accepted: " The gifts of the people which are offered to tlie
Lord cannot be used for any other purpose than for the church,
or for the use of the poor or the orphans, for they are the gifts of
the people, the price of sins and the inheritance of the poor. '"'
He died in 227.
Pontian was the choice of the clergy and people of Rome. The
church enjo5'ed peace. But in a short time Maximus the emper-
or banished him to the isle of Sardinia, where he died after ruling
the church but five years.
216 AXTERUS, CORNELIUS, STEPHEN AND DENNIS.
Anterus reigned only a month, when he too was put to death.
When tlie clergy and people of Rome met in a large room to vote for
the Pontiff to the surprise of all, a dove appeared and settled on
the head of a layman named Fabian, a stranger to them all. They
took it as a sign from heaven, and elected him to the Chair of
Peter. He appointed a deacon in each of the seven regions of
Rome to look after the widows and tl)e orphans. About the same
time he ordained seven subdeacons and appointed them to churches
as notaries, to gather the remains of those put to death for the
faith and write the lives and acts of the saints and martyrs. This
was the origin of attaching the lower clergy to particular churches
and these were the first notaries ever appointed by any authority.
He commanded that on Holy Thursday, the old oils should be
burned, and new oils consecrated by the bishops, as given in the
ceremonies of Holy Week.
Cornelius began his reign in the year 250. He moved the bodies
of Sts. Peter and Paul buried by Lucina in her garden to the
more honorable church of St. Peter's on the Vatican. As he con-
verted many Romans to the faith, he was banished into exile,
where he was consoled by the letters of St. Cyprian the great
archbishop of Carthage. When recalled to Rome, he refused to
sacrifice to the statue of the god Mars and was put to death.
AVhen Stephen came to the throne in the year 253, he ordained
that priests and deacons should wear their sacred vestments only
in the church. Before this time the vestments had been copied
more or less after the vestments of the priests of the Jewish temple,
and the costumes of the nobility of that age. W'hen the cele-
brated question of the re-baptism of heretics rose in the African
church, they sent the dispute to the Roman Pontiff to be decided.
Pope Stephen in his reply to St. Cyprian archbishop of Carthage
wrote these celebrated words: "Let nothing be changed, hold only
what is given in tradition." ' When persecutions rose againsi the
church, he retired to the Catecombs, and there he held a synod of the
Roman clergy. Wliile saying Mass in the cemetery of St. Lucina, he
was surrounded by the officers of the government, and while on
his pontifical throne they cut off his head. Sixtus IL his successor
did not reign long before he too was captured and led to tiie place
of execution. St. Lawrence the deacon used to assist him in say-
ing Mass. When the latter asked him if he was going to offer
sacrifice, without a minister, the Pope predicted that he too would
soon lollow him to the martyr's crown.
Pope Dennis was a monk when he was selected to the chair
made vacant by the martyrdom of St. Sixtus. He wrote against
the Sabellians, who taught that there was only one Person in God,
that the eternal Father suffered in Christ and against those who
denied the divinity of Christ. Dennis the saintly archbishop of
Alexandria was accused of a heresy before Pope Dennis. The
Pope called at once a synod of the clergy of Rome to examine the
> Brev. Rom.
FELIX, MARCELINUS AND MAKCELLUS. 217
case. Bui; as the archbishop of Alexandria repeatedly wrote to
Rome that the accusations were false, and the Pope absolved him.
He appointed pastors to all the chief churches of Rome, erected new
parishes in the eternal city, and formed new dioceses in many
parts of the world. lie impressed his personality on the
whole church before his death.
In 269 Felix began to reign. He commanded that Mass should be
said only over the remains of the martyrs. Whence from him
arose the discipline of enclosing the relics of the martyrs in the
altar stones. This was evidently suggested by the custom of say-
ing Mass on the tombs of the martyrs in the Catecombs during
the persecutions of the preceding years.
St. Eutychianus took the chair in 275. He ordered that the fruits
of the earth and the things brought by the people to the church
should be blessed at the altar, that the clergy should wear the dal-
matics and purple vestments when burying the bodies of the mar-
tyrs.
In the year 283 the clergy and Roman people elevated Oaius to
the throne. He came from Dalmatia. One of his first acts was
to ordain that no one should be consecrated a bishop, till he had
received in their proper order the office of porter, reader, exorcist,
acolyte, subdeacon, deacon and priest.
When Marcelinus was elected in 296, the terrible persecution of
Dioclesian raged against the christians of Rome and tliroughout the
empire. It is said, but still disputed by the learned, that Marcel-
inus, frightened by the fear of a terrible death by martyrdom, of-
fered incense to the false gods of Rome so as to save his life, think-
ing that his external act was harmless while in his heart he still re-
mained a christian. But soon, recognizing his error, he called a
council of bishops to Rome, where clothed in sackcloth and ashes,
he entered the council. Publicly and before them all he confessed
what he had done with tears streaming down his face. But not
a bishop rose to condemn him. With one voice they all cried out:
"You are judged by your own mouth. For no one can judge the
first See. For Peter also fell into the same weakness of mind,
and he asked God's forgiveness with the same tears." Returning
to Rome, he publicly and boldly went before the emperor and
accused him of tempting him to sacrifice to idols. At once he
was arrested and put to death in the year 296.
Marcellus his successor was a Roman citizen, well knowing the
clergy and people of Rome. He reorganized the 2/> divisions of
the city into which it had been divided by his predecessor St.
Cletus, appointing pastors to each, and giving them the titles of the
churches to which they were thus attached. Many years later the
clergy belonging to these churches began to be called cardinals,
while at this time they were called the titulars of the churches of
Rome. These divisions were called regions or dioceses. This Pope
directed that the people living in these quasi parishes should go to
their own pastor for baptism, confession and for the arrangements
218 EUSEPIUS AND MELCHIADES.
of the funerals of the martyrs, who belonged to these parishes.
These regulations were later extended to the whole church, and
they are the rules of every diocese of the world to-day.
When Pope Marcellus was imprisoned for the faith, he sent letters
to be read in the various churches which he founded in various
parts of the world. Through the patriarch of Antioch, he wrote
to tiie bishops and archbishops of that part of the East, defending
the supremacy and authority of the Roman See over all the bishops
of the world.
In the year 309 Eusepius became the head of the universal church.
He instructed and baptized Eusepius, son of Restitutaanoblelady
of Sardiuia and called him after his own name. This young man
became the great and celebrated bishop and writer, who sustained
the waning faith of the church in the East.
Melchiades began his reign in 311, a native of Africa, he had
been incorporated into the diocese of Rome. While a priest, he sent
letters to the Emperor Maxentius, asking him to mitigate the per-
secutions of the christians. Soon after this Maxentius was con-
quered by Constantino in battle, and the latter being couverted,
declared the freedom of worship. At that time the Donatist her-
esy began to make trouble. They believed that the true church
only remained then in Africa, that all the rest of the world was
heretical and that no baptism except given by them was valid. They
re-baptized catholics who joined them; taught that those who com-
mitted suicide were martyrs, and asked others to kill them as well
as practising other fanatical errors. A deputation from them came
to Constantino asking him to condemn Ca?cilianus archbishop of
Carthage. Constantine replied : "You ask of me a judge of worldly
things to give my sentence, when I am awaiting for the sentence of
Christ himself. Nevertlieless three bishops as judges have been
sent to Rome, to Melchiades the Pontiff, that for the unity and the
peace of the brethren a bvnod may be called. " When these three bish-
ops from Africa came to Rome accompanied by fifteen others, un-
der Pope Melchiades they held a council at the house of Faustus
at the Lateran Palace, where they all pronounced Cjecilianus inno-
cent of the accusations of the Donatists. Thei* sentence was at
once confirmed by Pope Melchiades. lie ordained that when a
dispute rose between bishops regarding a diocese, the oldest in
episcopal orders should be preferred, and that the defeated bishops
should be appointed to some other sees. He commanded that no
one should fast on Sunday or on Thursday, because on tlu^se days
the Pagans celebrated their superstitious rites: that the offerings
of the people blessed by the bishop phould be divided among the
churches of the diocese, and that while governing a parish or
celebrating the services of the church no pastor could be separated
from the authority of the bishop. During his reign, the church
began to enjoy peace from persecutions, as the emperor Constan-
tine had already began to study the church, and had become more
and more attracted to the teachings of Christ.
SYLVESTER AND COKSTANTINE. 319
When the foregoing Pontiff died in the year 314 Sylvester be-
came his successor. From his youth he was educated in the chris-
tian doctrines by Cyriuus whom his father Rnfinus selected as his
tutor. When he was 30 years old. Pope Marcellinus made him a
presbyter or cardinal of the Eoman church. During this time he
excelled all the other clergy in piety and learning. It is said that
Constantine the emperor had been at this time afflicted by an in-
curable leprosy, and baths of blood were recommended by his phy-
sicians. At niglit it is said the holy apostles Peter and Paul ap-
peai-ed to him, and told him that if he wislied to be cured from that
loathsome, incurable disease, he must go to Pope Sylvester. The
latter instructed and baptized him, when at once he was healed
of the fatal disease. In all parts of the Eoman empire Constan-
tine gave liberty to the christians. He erected and restored the
churches, gave Pope Sylvester the Lateran palace, the residence
of the Roman emperors from the time of Nero. Up to this time
St. Helena the pious mother of Constantine, had quietly pre-
pared a chamber in the palace where Sylvester used to secretly say
Mass. Under the advice of this holy and learned Pope, Constan-
tine did much for the church. Before going into his battle against
Maxeutins, lie prayed for light, when suddenly there appeared to
him and to the whole army a cross of light in the sky, while over it
sparkled the words in Latin: "In this Sign you will conquer.''
From that time the cross of Christ became the sign of the Roman
armies. He rebuilt the old church of St. Peter's, tlie tomb of St.
Peter on the Vatican. He laid the bodies of Sts. Peter and Paul in
-a metallic casket, on the lid of which he placed a cross of solid gold
weighing 150 lbs. and deposited the casket to rest forever under the
altar of the great St. Peter's church. There it remains even to our
time. Tiiere all the bishops of the world must come at regular
times to give an account of the state of religion in their dioceses
to the Successor of Peter the Father of souls.
At this time Arins a priest of Alexandria began to revive the
errors of Celsius ; teaching that Jesus Christ was not the Son of
God, but the most perfect creature that God could make. When
his errors began to disturb the whole church, an ecumenical
council, the first of nineteen or twenty ever held was called at
Nice, where the legates of Sylvester presided in his name, the
emperor being present. There were assembled 318 bishops from
all parts of the world, many of them bearing the marks of the
persecutions, which they had suffered for the faith. When the
acts of the council condemning Arius and defining the divinity of
Christ were laid before him, Sylvester confirmed them and en-
acted most important matters relating to the celebration of Easter
and other disciplinary measures, which we practice even in our
day. Like all teachers of error, Arius would not submit. An-
other council was called by Sylvester at Rome, where 84 bishops
again condemned his errors relating to the divinity of Christ.
He promulgated wise laws for the good of the church, decreeing that
220 PEACE GIVEN BY CONSTANTINE.
holy chrism could be blessed by only one bishop, that a priest should
anoint the top of the head of the baptized when baptizing ; that
deacons should wear the dalmatics in the church; that the clergy
should wear the maniple on the left hand ; that Mass should be
said with linens ; that the clergy should be ordained at stated
times ; that they should exercise each order before ascending to
a higher grade of orders ; that the laity should not accuse the
clergy of crimes, and that no clergyman should be tried before any
civil judge, but before the ecclesiastical tribunals. As the pagans
had dedicated the days of the week to their false gods, from which
custom came the names of the week days he decreed that Sunday
should be called the Lord's day, that Saturday should be called the
Sabbath day as was customary among the christians from the days
of the apostles, and that the other days should be named ferials,
because the clergy, freed from worldly work and cares, could de-
vote their entire time to the work of the ministry during the
week as on Sundays. He directed that poor clergymen should live
with wealthy pastors so as to partake in their livings ; that the
church should support nuns and virgins consecrated to God, be-
sides other measures for the whole church.
When the emperor Constantine now converted to Christ had
studied the constitution of the church, he saw that her visible
head was the Bishop of Rome, with universal jurisdiction over all
the bishops of the world. He learned that Christ had founded an
immortal spiritual empire, and that her primal See was the city
of Rome, It was evident that the two great empires, the civil, of
which he was head, and the spiritual, of which the Bishop of
Rome was head, could not live in peace in one city Rome. Ho
looked over the world for a new seat for his civil government. On
the shores of the Bosphorus separating Europe from Asia, stood a
little city Byzantium, whose bishop was subject to the archbishop of
Heraclea. From that site the emperor saw he could easily govern
Europe, Asia and Africa, over which his vast empire ruled. There
he laid the foundations of the great historic city of Constantinople,
called after himself, and which has since so figured in history as
the seat of the Greek or Byzantium empire, of which it remained
the capital, till captured by the Turks in 1453. Leaving Rome
to the Popes, Constantine moved the seat of his vast empire to
the new capital. It was a stroke of statesmanship which all gener-
ations have admired. From that time the Bishops of Rome were
free from the blighting influence of a pagan empire dwelling in
their city and, which had persecuted them from the days of St.
Peter.
When Sylvester died in 336 Mark succeeded him. During the
reign of Constantine, he directed that the bishop of Ostia, who
always consecrates and crowns the Pope, should wear the pallium
of an archbishop. He built two beautiful churches in Rome which
Constantine enriched.
St. Julius, son of Rusticusa Roman, came to the Chair of Peter»
222 JULIUS AND LIBORIUS.
after the death of St. Mark. The Arian heresy denying the di-
vinity of Christ had made great progress in tlie East, many of the
bishops of Arabia, of Egypt and of Asia Minor being driven from
their episcopal sees, by tiie Arians. Athanasius a deacon of Alex-
andria, and later the successor of Alexander in the archiepiscopal
see of St. Mark, was the greatest opponent of Arius at the council
of Nice, called m 325 to examine the new doctrine. The greai
historic churches of the apostles in the East were now disturbed
by the errors of Arius and his followers. Arianism became the
greatest foe of the christian religion. The whole fury of hell ap-
peared to concentrate now on the devoted head of Athanasius.
When they could not ruin him by getting a woman to swear against
him, they drove him into exile from his episcopal city of Alexan-
dria. He came to Rome to lay his troubles before the Pope, the
Father of the whole church. Pope Julius received him with the
greatest kindness,- and defended him with the whole weight of his
Pontifical authority. The Arian bishops then held a council at
Tyre. There they proclaimed that the doctrine of the Divinity of
Christ defined at Nice was not correct, and that Christ was not
the son of God but a creature. Pope Julius at once condemned all
the bishops present at this council. Again be proclaimed the Di-
vinity of Christ.
Then the Arian bishops held another council at Antioch, where
they went through the same process and again they were condemned
by the Bishop of Rome. The latter then called two councils at
Rome, where the exiled bishops were ordered to give an account
of their exile. The Pope then restored the right bishops to their
sees, and deposed and drove the Arian bishops out of the
episcopal sees they had usurped. Under the influence of Constan-
tius the emperor, Pope Julius restored St, Athanasius to his see
of Alexandria. He rejected the formula of faith composed by the
Arian bishops, in the second synod of Antioch. He called a coun-
cil of the bishops of both the East and of the West to Sardica,
where he sent his legates to preside, there he restored the ancient
discipline of the church. Again he defined the catholic faith re-
lating to the Divinity of Christ, and enacted many useful measures
of discipline for the church universal, which are in force even in
our day. He commanded that the clergy should bring their dis-
putes only before an ecclesiastical judge, and that all documents
relating to church affairs should be sworn to before church notaries.
When Liborius took upon himself the government of the uni-
versal church, John a wealthy Roman belonging to the highest
nobility with his wife of equal rank. They were both pious people
of Rome, but they had no children. They prayed to our Lord for
light to know what to do with their great riches. On the night
of the 5th of August, when all Rome is usually oppressed with the
heat, snow in the morning covered the top of the Esquilian hill,
the Virgin appeared to these good persons, telling them to build a
church in her honor, or the spot where they would find the snow.
THE WORKS OF DAMASUS. 223
When John went to the Pope in the morning, he found that the
Pontiff had seen the same vision during the night. The fame of
the prodigy quickly spread all over Kome, and in a little while the
clergy and people of the city, with the Pope at their head came to
the top of the hill, where they found it all white covered with snow.
They began at once the building of the great church, dedicated
to the Virgin Mother of God. They called it Mary at the Snows,
the Basilica of St. Liborius, or St. Mary at the Manger. But as
many churches from almost the apostolic age had been dedicated
to the Mother of God in Rome, as this was most magnificent of
them all they called it St. Mary Major. That was the origin of
the great and famous church of that name. Liborius died in 366.
When Constantius had banished Liborius to Beroea and tried
to put up Felix as an anti-pope, Damasus, who had lived for
many years as a presbyter of the Eoman church, with the title of
the church of St. Lawrence, had become the archdeacon of the
Roman church. He followed the Pope into his exile, but soon
returned. Liborius then condemned the decrees of the council of
Rimini, wherein the bishops upheld the errors of the Arians. He
lived for some time in the catecombs, and then he appointed
Damasus to oversee the government of the whole church. On
the death of Liborius, Damasus when 60 years of age became Pope.
Ursinus got mad because he had not been elected in his place^
gathered a crowd of people in the church of St. Mary Major, and
got Paul of Tivoli to consecrate him bishop of Rome, all of whichi
was contrary to the ancient discipline. In 381 the matter irt
dispute was settled by a great council held at Aquileia, where the
regular election of Damasus was confirmed.
The Eunomians held all the errors of the Arians. But they
differed from the latter by teaching more explicitly than the
others, then called Semiarians, that the three Persons of the Trin-
ity differed in ns.ture, thus making out three Gods. They bap-
tized with the words: " In the name of the uncreated Father, in
the name of the created Son, and in the name of the Holy Spirit
the Sanctifier, created by the Son. " ' They re-baptized the
catholics who joined them, teaching that they could understand
the nature of God as well as he understood himself ; that the Son
did not take a human soul, but that the Divinity animated his
body; that the saints were to be despised; that the miracles per-
formed by them were the work of the demons, and that if we be-
lieve, no matter what sins we commit, we will be saved. These
were also the errors of the Macedonians, Semiarians and Arians,
who likewise believed that the Holy Spirit was created as the em-
bassador of God to man. The Apollonarians taught that Christ
had not a reasonable but an animal soul ; that the Persons of the
Trinity were not equal to each other, and that after the last resur-
rection we will have to keep the law of Moses in the other life.
Pope Damasus was a wise and learned Pontiff. He condemned
' Gautler De Haeres Sec. 14.
224 ORIGIN OF THE VULGATE VERSION.
nil these errors. He called a council at Constantinople, where
lie confirmed the decrees of the council of Nice. He enacted that
those who falsely accused others should suffer the same punish-
ment as they wished to inflict on the innocent ; that the Psalms
of David should be sung in the churches by alternate choirs, as
was customary among the Jews, and that the *' Glory be to the
Father " &c. be said at the end of each psalm.
The Septuagint version of the Bible, used so much by our Lord,
in the days of the apostles had been translated into Latin, and
used in every church. But by the mistakes of those who copied
it, there were many various readings. The most celebrated
translation was tlie Vulgate, that is common Italian Version
used mostly in Italy. The most learned man of the age was
St. Jerome, who later became the private secretary of this Pope,
and some writers say he became a cardiual. By command of Pope
Damasus, St. Jerome translated nearly all the Old Testament
into Latin, and revised the New Testament, thus giving a very
perfect rendering of the original Hebrew and Greek Scriptures.
Por years he had lived in and travelled over the Holy Land, study-
ing Hebrew and the traditions of Christ and of the Jews relating
to the holy Books, so that of all men he was the best prepared for
this great work in the church of God, Damasus at once confirmed
his rendition of the Bible, and it was read so often in the churches
that it was called even at that time the Vulgate, that is the Com-
mon Version. From that date the Vulgate of St, Jerome has been
the official Version of the Scriptures in the church.
To reform abuses. Pope Damasus forbade the clergy to frequent
the homes of widows and orphans, or to receive from them personal
gifts. 'I'll is decree of the Pope was read in all the churches of
Pome, and later it became a law of the Koman Empire. He took
vigorous measures against the Arians, who denied the Divin-
ity of Christ, and condemned the Apollinarian followers of bishop
Apollinarius*, who taught that Christ had not assumed a mind or
soul, but only a body and an animal soul, that the Divine Person of
the Son was to him the same as the mind in man, and that there-
fore Christ was not a complete man. Damasus also condemned
many famous Arian bishops so as to root out the terrible heresy.
At that time Greece and all the surrounding countries, even to the
shores of the Danube were called Illyricum. Over the churches of
these countries the Popes of this age had before appointed bishops
and archbishops as their Vicars or legates, while the patriarchs of
Constantinople now claimed jurisdiction over them* and the right
of appointing all the bishops of these countries. This Pope
Damasus resisted, as being anew thing in the church, for the
Bishops of Rome had reserved the appointment of bishops in
in these regions to themselves. Damasus appointed St. Ascholius
bishop of Theesalonica his vicar over this vast country, telling him
in letters still extant, to watch lest nothing be done in Constanii-
nople against the faith, or against the canons, thus showing that this
SIRICIUS AND ANASTASIUS. 225
great Pope was even then suspicious of the Greeks at such an early-
age, even then the patriarchs of Constantinople claiming jurisdic-
tion over the Illyricum viciariate.'
When Nectarius was elected archbishop of Constantinople, then
the seat of the vast Roman empire, the emperor Theodosius
sent a deputation to Rome asking Damasus to confirm the election.
The delegation was composed of Sts. Epiphanius and Paulinus with
St. Jerome as their secretary. The Pope retained St. Jerome till his
death in Rome and incorporated him into the Roman diocese ap-
pointing him his secretary. In 431 the bishops of the East official-
ly proclaimed that they would follow the example of Damasus.
Ambrose, Athanasius, &c., who in the early church were eminent for
their learning. He drained the Vatican, rebuilt and ornamented
his titular church of St. Lawrence, and did many things for the
good of the church. He died in 384.
Pope Siricius was next elected by the universal acclamation of the
clergy and people of Rome. He was a Roman well known to them
all. His first act was to issue to the bishops of Spain a decree relat-
ing to the reformation of the morals of the clergy. He then ordered
the bishops of Africa to hold a council. At once they met
to the number of 80, and put the commands of the Pope into ex-
ecution. He condemned Jovinian, who attacked the practice of
virginity, as well as Bonosus, bishop of Sardicensem, who denied the
divinity of Christ, and the virginity of Mary after the birth of our
Lord, and the Manichians, who held that the universe was ruled by
two Gods one good the other bad as well as the errors of the Euno-
mians, Appolarians, Arians, &c. He commanded that they should
be denied Communion till on their death-bed, and that they should
do penance in a monastery when they belonged to the clergy. He
induced emperor Theodosius to forbid idolatry in all parts of
the Roman empire. During his reign the church rapidly spread in
all parts of the world.
Anastasius, the son of Maxim us became Pontiff on the death of
Siricius. He was consecrated by the bishop of Ostia as customary
from the apostolic age. He at once turned his attention to healing
the wounds of the church universal, by condemning or reconciling
those who held the false doctrine of the Arianians, the Originists
and the other heretics of the East. He condemned those who
persecuted the christians of the Orient in union with the apostolic
See of Rome. When the bishops of Africa held a council, they
sent as a legate to him, Venerius archbishop of Milan, asking that
he would help them in their difficulties, as they had not sufficient
clergymen for the needs of the church in Africa. Pope Anastasius
sent them a kind and paternal letter, warning them not to be mis-
lead by the errors of the Donatists, who at that time afflicted the
African church with their false doctrines. By his authority as
Bishop of Rome, the Donatist bishops and clergy of that country
were received back into the catholic church, after they had abjured
' Butler's Lives St. Damasus Dec. 11.
226 lifNOCElSTT I. AND ZOSIMUS.
their heresy, and adhered to the teachings of tlie Roman church.
He ordained that no one from a distance, or from across the sea
should be elevated to the ranks of the clergy without the testi-
mony of at least five bishops. He commanded that when the
Gospel was recited or sung, that all the priests should stand with
their heads bowed. He died in the year 399.
When Innocent I. came to tlie throne, a controversy had arisen.
Some claimed that children born of catholic parents were members
of the church and would go to heaven without baptism. At once
Innocent decreed that the teachings of Pelagius and Ccelestin were
false, that children, even when born of christian parents should be
baptized, that they may be born again in Christ, and that the origi-
nal sin in Avhich they were conceived and born might be wiped out.
He commanded Saturday to be kept holy as a fast day in memory
of Christ's burial. A native of Albano he lived in the time of the
great Sts. Augustine and Jerome, whom he much admired. Of this
Pope St. Jerome wrote to Demetriades the Virgin: *'You must
hold the faith of holy Innocent, who has been elected to the Apos-
tolic Chair of Anastasius of blessed memory.'^'
In 417 Zosimus took the reins of government. He was a Greek,
reared in all the polite learning of the famous schools of Athens.
His first important pontifical act was to confirm the decrees of
the African councils against the Pelagians, who denied original
sin, saying that man can himself merit grace. This he did so
as to strengtlien the hands of the bishops all over the world
against these impius heretics. He issued apostolic letters to the
whole cHurch condemning Pelagius and Coelestius. He tlien
took active measures to reform the discipline of the church, with
that object sending briefs and letters to all the churches of the
world. He enacted a law that when boys were studying for the
church, they should remain readers till their twentieth year as was
customary from the earliest times, that if they were old when con-
verted and baptized, they were to remain in minor orders for fif-
teen years, and acolytes or subdeacons for four years, before being
promoted to deaconship, which order they were to exercise for five
years before they could be promoted to the priesthood, which
they could only attain by tlie votes of the other priests. He
directed tliat deacons should bless the paschal candle on Holy
Saturday in all parish churches, that deacons should wear the
stole on their right side, that the clergy should not use wine or
intoxicating drink in public houses, but rather they might in the
iiouses of the members of the church, especially in the homes of
the clergy, but that they must do so with moderation.
AVhen Zosimus went to his reward in the year 417, Boniface, a
sou of the Roman Jucundus, a presbyter of the Roman church,
by the unanimous votes of the clergy and people of Rome ascended
to the Pontificate. The cardinals and all the clergy of Rome
with the bishops of nine provinces took part in his election.
^ Brev. Boman Sup. 28 Jan.
BONIFACE AND C(ELESTIN I. 227
Although he was unwilling, they persuaded him to take upon
himself the care of the universal government of the church. I3ut
troubles at once arose. Eulalius, an archdeacon, called some of
the deacons and people together, and in the meeting got himself
ordained in Constantine's I3asilica and consecrated as the Bishop
of Kome. This usurper, being a wily politican, caused much
trouble in the church, till at last the matter was settled by the
bishops and people of Home proclaiming that Boniface was the
real successor of St. Peter. The latter at once reformed the
manner of electing the Pope, so that in future after his death such
a dispute about the Papacy could not take place again. He had
the full confidence of the Emperor of the Koman empii'e, who
while he lived used all his efforts to promote religion in all parts
of the world. Although he was a very learned man, Pope Zosi-
mus asked the advice of St. Augustine in his answer to the
attacks of the Pelagians. In his reply the great St. Augustine
tells the Pope that he sends his works to him, not to teach him,
but rather that the Pope may examine and correct his writings.
Tiiat was a remarkable declaration or profession of the supremacy
of the Bishop of Rome by St. Augustine, the greatest mind of
the early church. The Pope corrected Patroclus, Bishop of
Aries, who tried to force himself into the archiepiscopal see of
another archbishop. He sent letters to Hilary, Bishop of Narbon,
commanding him to do nothing except according to the rights of
his own metropolitan and of the apostolic See. He forbade nuns
or Avomen to wash the paliums of the archbishop. To reform
abuses, he ordained that no one should offer incense in the church
except the minister celebrating at the altar. He forbade clergy-
men to become slaves, as slavery was quite common in Europe at
that time, till it was gradually and quietly abolished by the church
in after ages.
Coelestin I. who had been created a cardinal deacon by Pope
Innocent I., now came to the Eoman See, without any contest or
division of the people. Knowing that it was no use to try to con-
vert (ycelestius, he ordered him out of Italy, as the only way of
having peace in the church, because he was the first and chief
disciple of Pelagius, and he was continually preaching his false
doctrines and disturbing the people. Celesius then became the
leader of the Pelagians. He retired to the East where he con-
tinued to preach his false doctrines as did his disciple Agricola
one of his disciples, who retired into England where he poisoned the
people with his false teachings. To counteract the errors Pope
Celestinus sent missionaries into England, Avho met with such
success, that they converted many of the people. Having become
acquainted with the people of the British Isles, he sent to them
Germanus as his legate to Ireland. Soon after he consecrated
Palladius a deacon of the Roman church, and sent him as the
apostle of Ireland. At this time St.* Patrick was a slave among
the Irish. When he was liberated he came to Rome where he made
228 SIXTHS III. AND LEO THE GREAT.
his studies and there he received episcopal consecration and Pope
Celestine sent him as the apostle of Ireland.
In the imperial city of Constantinople now arose another diflB-
culty. Nestoriiis its archbishop began to preach that Christ was
only a man, born of the Virgin, but not the natural Son of God,
the divinity having been united to him only for his merits. Pope
Celestine at once condemned him and his teachings. He appoint-
ed St. Cyril of Alexandria as his delegate to Constantinople to
represent him and examine Nestorius, stating that he would give
Nestorius ten days in which to retract liis errors, otherwise he
would condemn him. When Nestorius would not retract, the Pope
called the third ecumenical council of the church at Ephesus, over
which Celestine presided by his Legates. In that great council of
the church, the Pope condemned Nestorius, his false doctrines,
the Pelagians and the other heretics. He commanded that at the
time of death, no one should be denied absolution; that criminals or
any one from the ranks of the laity should not be directly pro-
moted to the episcopacy, that archbishops, should not exercise epis-
copal functions in the province of another archbishop, that one of
another diocese could not be elected to a vacant episcopal see, that
the 150 Psalms should be sung.
When he died in the year 432 Sixtus III. came to preside over
the church universal. Wonderful peace and harmony then
reigned in the church. While he was a cardinal presbyter of the
Roman church, the great St. Augustin highly praised him for his
writings and his works against the Pelagians then afflicting the
church in Africa. One of his first acts in the chair of Peter was
to confirm the acts of the council of Ephesus, held a short time be-
fore his election. With his confirmation he sent the decrees of this
council to all the churches both of the East and of the West, de-
fining against Nestorius that Christ had two perfect natures, one
of God the other of man united in the Person of God the Son. He
sent his definitions with the decrees of the council to Nestorius
himself, and to all the bishops of the East. To the archbishop of
Antioch, he wrote: "Nothing new is allowed, for nothing can be
added to the old. Look for the faith of the elders, and let not our
faith be disturbed by a mixture of new doctrines." When he could
not be induced or forced to alienate the property of the church, he
was accused of crimes by the ex-consuls Anicius Bassus and the
patrician Marinianus. But a council of 56 bishops, the emperor
and senate and the whole clergy of Rome being called by him at
Rome, after examining the case they declared him innocent, and
condemned his calumniators.
In the year 440 Leo I. began his reign. He was an Etuscan. At
that time the Roman empire was falling before the inroads of the
barbarians from the North. Attila the king of the Huns, called
''the Scourge of God," after laying the rest of southern Europe in
ruins, with fire and sword hcinvaded Italy. Tiie northern barbar-
ians were haters of learning, of arts, of the science. They had
LEO I. MEETING ''THE SCOURGE OF GOD. " 229
destroyed all before them. Having captured Aquilia with great
carnage they burned and levelled it. Then they advanced with an
irresistible army on Eome, the centre of religion and of civilization.
The treasures of books, of bibles, of sculpture, of the fine arts,
of architecture, from which the whole world copied, were then
within the walls of Rome, and Rome was to meet the fate of Troy,
of Babylon, of Jerusalem. The work of the human race was to
be blotted from the face of the earth by the legions of Attila.
Under an inspiration. Pope Leo put on his pontifical robes, accom-
panied by all his clergy, he went out and met Attila near the river
Po on his march to the doomed city, and there with an inspired
eloquence he asked Attila to spare Rome. At the sight of the fear-
less Pontiff, Attila appeared struck powerless. He turned his army
aside at the voice of the weak but brave Pope, and thus he spared
Rome. When his generals and his army grumbled at the loss of
the spoils of the greatest city of the world, Attila told them that
the night before God Almighty appeared to him in sleep, clothed
in the same priestly robes worn by Leo, and threatened him with
instant death unless he listened to the Pope. As the Nestorians
and Eutychians still troubled the church, St. Leo called a coun-
cil at Chalcedon, which condemned them and there he confirmed
the decrees of that celebrated council. He built a monastery near
St. Peter's tomb on the Vatican; he rebuilt and beautified many
churches of the city. He ordered that to the canon of the Mass
should be added these words: "The holy sacrifice the spotless
host." He ordained that no nun receive the veil till she had
lived in virginity for forty years. While living, Leo had ap-
pointed Hilary, then a deacon of the Roman church, as his legate to
preside as chairman over the council of Ephesus, called the "robber
council.'' Persecuted by the violence and the fear of Dioscorus,
archbishop of Alexandria, Hilary fled from the council and came
b*'5k to report to Ijco. At once Leo issued an encyclical letter to all
the churches of the world, condemning the errors of Nestorius and
Eutyches.
Li 461 Hilary was elected to succeed Leo. At his request Vic-
torinus of Aquitain reformed the calendar which the whole chris-
tian world used for many centuries. He forbade bishops to nominate
their successors, or be consecrated without the consent of their
archbishop, to move from one diocese to another, or to do any-
thing forbidden by the canons. He forbade men twice married to
receive holy orders. He confirmed the four first councils of the
church. He appointed Leontius archbishop of Orleans his vicar
in all France, whom he commanded to call the bishops each four
years together in council. He commanded that lands belonging
to the church should be sold only by order of a council. He ap-
pointed places in the eternal city, where stations could be held and
forbade the clergy to mix in worldly things. He died in 461.
Simplicius Tiburtinus was the son of Castorius. It was a time of
great difficulties for the church, as most of the rulers of the world
230 SIMPLICIUS TIBURTINUS AND FELIX III.
were followers of the Arians, the Nestorians, the Eutychians and of
other false teachers. These conspired and asked of Leo, the
emperor of the Greek empire, that the archbishop of Constanti-
nople might have certain privileges detrimental to the See of Rome.
Certain concessions had been apparently conceded to the see of
Constantinople by the bishops of the Orient assembled in the
council of Chalcedon. But they had been vetoed by former Popes.
Simplicius sent his legate to the imperal city of Constantinople,
to settle the difficnlty. After his report, the Pope decreed that
Timothy ^Elurus, had wrongly invaded the see of Alexandria, that
aided by the power of the central government at Constantinople
he had driven out the right bishop. He did this under the plea
or pretention that the rightful bishop of the see was propagating
false doctrines. But Pope Simplicius condemned him. Then he re-
sisted calling a new council for the settlement of the diflflculties of
the church. Again Peter Mogg invaded the episcopal chair of Alex-
andria, but Pope Simplicus condemned him, and ordered him from
the city, so he could not cause an insurrection. Through his
legates, he restored Timothy the legitimate archbishop of Alexan-
dria. Simplicius absolved Solofaciolus after he had asked forgive-
ness of the Roman See, for having nominated Dioscorus to holy or-
ders, which was contrary to the canons of thechnrch then in force.
He confirmed the election of the archbishop of Antioch, which
took place contrary to the rules of the council of Nice, and de-
creed that for the future, the election of the archbishop of Antioch
should be reserved to the bishops of the East subjects of the patri-
archate of Antioch. He commanded that the revenues of the church
should be divided into four parts, one for the bishop, another for the
clergy, and the others for the building of churches and the sup-
port of the widows and the orphans. He appointed Zeno, one of
the bishops of Spain, his legate for that whole country, and gave
him orders how to keep the other bishops of Spain within the
canons of the church. He marked out the limits of the regions
of Rome, into which the city had been divided by his predecessors,
directing where the people were to go for the reception of the
sacraments.
Felix III., son of the noble house of the Anicians, the great-
great grandfather of Gregory the Great, ascended the throne of
Peter in 483 on the death of Simplicius. A man of great firmness
of mind, when Rome was captured by the Arian heretics, he alone
and almost single handed, would not cede the right of the Papacy,
although urged to do so by Zeno the emperor. He issued an edict
condemning the invasion; deposed Peter FuUo, archbiehop of Anti-
och; called Acasui us archbishop of Constantinople to Rome to give
an account of his false teachings and bad life, and commanded
him under pain of excommunication to obey the Roman Pontiff.
He ordained that no church could be consecrated except by a
bishop; that when a person was once baptized he must not be bap-
tized again under severe punishment.
GEI.ASIUS AND ANASTASIUS. 231
"When Felix died in 492, Gelasius of Africa rose lo the Roman
See. He was a man of great and ardent faith, well versed in all
learning of his day. He defended his See from her enemies.
He reformed the Massbook. Under his short reign of four years
the clergy rapidly increased all over the world. In his day the
emperor Anastasius was a heretic, and king Theodoricns an
Arian. But such was the eminence of the Roman See all over
the world, that these two powerful rulers both of the East and of
the West respected the power and the authority of St. Gelasius.
He delivered Rome from famine, forbade pagan theatricals, which
had remained as the debaucheries and deviltries of the pagan ages of
Rome and thus blotted out the last vestiges of idolatry in Rome.
He ordained many things relating to the beauty and dignity of di-
vine worship; condemned Euphemius of Constantinople; wrote
many beautiful letters and documents to the churches in all parts
of the world; enlightened them regarding the true doctrines of the
church; confounded the Manichians and Pelagians of Africa;
condemned their writings to the flames; composed many of the Lat-
in hymns of the breviary and missal; issued decrees relating to
canon law and wrote fine articles against Arius, Pelagius, Nestorius
and others of his time. He separated the canonical books of the
Bible from the aprocryphal writings, and gave us the canon of
Scriptures as we have them at the present day. He called a synod
of seventy bishops to Rome, and in that council, he there officially
decreed that such would be forever the authentic and canonical
books of the Holy Scriptures. The great works he did for the
church universal are too numerous to mention.
When Anastasius took upon himself the government of the
universal church in 496, his ttrst attention was turned to the church
of the East, then greatly afflicted with the false doctrines of the
Eutychians, and the j)eculiar teachings of the disciples of Origin.
Using his apostolic authority, with zeal and prudence, he rooted
out these heresies in many parts of the Orient. He sent many apos-
tolic letters and mandates to the bishops of Europe. He taught
the whole church by his many briefs, encyclicals and apostolic man-
dates, while at the same time he carefully guarded the discipline of
the clergy and people of Rome. When the bishops of the African
church met in plenary council, they sent to this Pope their legate
Anastasius Venerius, a priest of Mileri, asking the Bishop of Rome *
to send them missionary priests, which the church in Africa,
afflicted by the Arians, the Donatists and Pelagians so much want-
ed at that time. By the hand of Anastasius, he sent them a reply
full of fatherly charity and apostolic zeal for the church in Africa,
warning them not to be deceived by the wiles of the Donatists. By
the authority of this Pope, the bishops of Africa made a law, that
no bishop or clergyman of the Donatist church could exercise their
orders, when converted, if it would be an occasion of scandal to
the catholics. He made laws that no stranger could be received
into the ranks of the clergy, unless he had the recommendations of
232 SYMACHUS AND HORMISDAS.
at least five bishops, that when reciting the Holy Gospel at Mass
the celebrant must not sit but stand with bended head, out of
reverence to the word of God.
Pope Anastasius died in the year 498 and in 498, St. Symachus
was elected on the fourth day after the death of his predecessor.
His father was Fortunatus. At the time he was only a deacon.
The conclave met in the basilica of Constantine. The larger part
of the Roman clergy were present with the Roman senators. But
many of the laity , under the bad advice of Festus, the chairman of
the Roman senate, gave their votes for Lawrence, the arch-priest of
the Roman diocese. There arose then a division and a schism.
But the zeal and prudence of Symachus who called four synods of
the Roman clergy, at last put an end to the division. When peace
was restored, he laid down laws for the election of the future
Popes and the selection of bishops all over the world, so that such
divisions and contests could not arise again. He made laws relat-
ing to the alienation of church property and for the reforming of
abuses. Following his advice the bishops of Orleans and of Agatho
held synods, in which wise statutes were formed for the govern-
ment of the dioceses and churches under their care. He issued
letters to all the churches of the christian world relating to the
preaching of the Gospel in that age of war, bloodshed and of
plunder. He gave both money and clothes to the captives of the
Vandals, Huns and Visigoths, as well as beautified many of the
churches of Rome then held captive under Arianian and other
barbarous kings.
When St. Symachus died, the clergy and laity of Rome met,
and on the seventh day the deacon Hormisdas received their UTian-
imous votes. The election was providential. For at that time
the church wanted a man of strong will and a saint to cope with
barbarian infidels and heretical knigs. In the eight years of his
reign he changed the whole face of the christian world. For eighty
years the churches of the Orient had been separated from the Ro-
man See. He sent them apostolic letters borne by his legates, by
which he brought them back again into the unity of the universal
church. He restored to their Sees the orthodox bishops of Africa,
whom the Vandals had banished to Sardinia. Remi. archbishop
of Rheims, had Clovis the king of France a short time before con-
verted and baptized at Rheims and with great ceremony he crowned
him king of the Franks. Hormisdas condemned the Maniciiians
and publicly burned their false books before the Constantinian
basilica. He taught the whole church by his numerous letters which
he sent to all parts of the world. His every act breathed zeal for
souls. His writings possess a singular beauty of style. He became
the most famous literary man of his age. Full of glory and honor,
esteemed among both pagans and christians, he died after nine
years of a glorious pontificate.
During the pontificate of the good Hormisdas, John of Con-
stantine was the cardinal priest or pastor of the church of
FELIX IV. AND BONIFACE II.
23^
Pammachins. He was elected Bishop of the universal church by
the unanimous votes of the Roman clergy. He ruled in the times
of Justinus the emperor. As Theodoric the heretical king had in-
vaded and conquered Italy, the Pope went to Constantinople to ask
aid from the Roman emperor. When entering the Golden gate
of the great city of Constantinople, before the whole people he
restored sight to a blind man. At once the Roman emperor before
the whole population prostrated himself at his feet. Having ar-
ranged to his satisfaction matters with the emperor, he returned
to Rome, and there issued letters to all the bishops of Italy com-
manding tliem to consecrate the churches of the Arianians accord-
ing to the catholic rite, and receive them into the fold, adding to his
letters these words: "Because when we were at Constantinople,
both for the catholic religion and for tlie cause of Theodoric,
wherever we could find sucli churches, we consecrated them."*
Soon after he Avas seized by the sameimpius Theodoric and prison-
ed at Ravenna where he died.
In 526 Felix IV^. was elevated to the Throne of the Fisherman.
He was the son of Castor and noted for his luimility and learning.
When Athalaric, the successor of Tiieodoric, began his reign as
emperor of Rome, although an Arian and denying the divinity of
Christ, for the honor of the Roman church, he made a law for the
members of his vast empire, that according to the apostolic custom,
the clergy should not be sued or cited before civil courts; that
tliey should first bring their case or dispute before the Roman
Pontiff; and that any one who would not do so would be considered
as in contempt of the Papal authority, and would have to pay a
large fine into the hands of their own bishop. This Pope con-
demned the error of those who held that a man ordained a priest
could return to worldly business. When he died on the 30th of
January, 530, Justinian the emperor and Athalaric the king of
Italy came to his funeral to do him honor.
Boniface II. was the first of the Popes up to this time, who does
not rank as a saint. He was elected to the headship of the church
universal in the year 530 by the votes of the clergy and people of
Rome. He was the son of Sigisvult the Goth. When the emper-
ors of the Byzantian empire had become masters of Rome, they
tried to control the election of the Popes, or at least they claimed
the right of vetoing or of confirming such election. Followingthis,
at the election of Boniface II., Athalaric, king of Italy presumed
to elect a pope. He tried to put his tool, Dioscorus. on the spiritual
throne of Peter. But the death of the latter, 29 days after the
election of Boniface, put an end to the threatened division in the
church. The latter then took measures to prevent such inter-
meddling political intrigues for the future and appointed his succes-
sor in the person of Vigilius the Deacon. But seeing that it was
contrary to the constitution of the church for a Pope to name his
successor he assembled a council of bishops in Rome, and then
* "Brev. Roman" May 17th.
•534
OFFICIAL DECISIONS.
publicly before them, he revoked and burned his own mandate.
Each year of his pontificate, he assembled a council of bishops
in Rome to legislate for the universal church.
One council of 531 bishops heard the appeal of Stephen of Lar-
issa, archbishop of Thessaly, whose election Epiphanius archbishop
of Constantinople contested. The latter then appealed to the
Roman See, because as the patriarch of Constantinople he claimed
the right of suspending Stephen from his episcopal functions. Pope
Boniface restored Stephen to his see reversing the sentence of the
patriarch of Constantinople; the same year he confirmed the de-
crees of the council of Orange, which had been laid before him
by St. Cesarius of Aries. He also condemned the teachings of
some of those bishops of France, who claimed that the first act of
religion comes from nature and not from the grace of Christ. He
regulated the education of students for the clergy; he ordained
the mode of electing bishops and regulated the sale of church
property. In his day rose that patriarch of the monastic life St.
Benedict. Although before his time religious houses had been
established in the Westby Sts. Augustin, Ambrose, Jerome, Martin
of Tours and Cassian, yet Benedict in the West first united them
all under one fixed and detailed rule which was soon almost every-
where adopted."'
John II. was consecrated Jan. 22, 532. His first act was to
confirm the decree of his predecessor against the sin of simony
that is selling spiritual things for money. His decree was con-
firmed by the emperor Athalaric, who had it engraved on a marble
tablet and set up before the entrance to St. Peter's church Rome.
At that time the prime minister of the king of Italy, wrote to the
Pope these words: " I have become the judge of the palace
The See of Peter, the admiration of the world, should grant a
special protection to those who are most closely bound to it, as
rulers of Italy we feel privileged to claim from it a larger share
of benevolence."'
Justinian the emperor sent to Pope John at Rome, Hypatius,
archbishop of Ephesus, and Demetrius, bishop of Philippi, asking
that certain concessions be allowed the Eutychians so they could
enter the church. Some claimed at this time that the Virgin
was not the mother of God, and that it could not be said that one
of the Persons of the Trinity suffered for us. The Pope at
once declared this to be heresy, citing the decision given before
by Pope Hormisdas deciding that all who held tliis doctrine were
without the food of the universal church. He wrote his decision
to the emperor Justinian, and announced it to the Roman senators
saying: "The emperor lias made known to us that three questions
have lately arisen in the East, viz. 'Can Jesus Christ be called one
of the Trinity?' Did he really suffer in the flesh the Divinity re-
maining impassible? Can the blessed Virgin be properly called
the Mother of God? We have given an affirmative answer to
> Darras Hist, of tbe Cburcb Vol. II. S. ir. * Darras Hist, of tbe Churcb Vol. II- p. iSt.
THE CUAIH IN WJIICH SI. VEiiJ-iv bAi' as UloxxUi" uF ROME.
236 INTRODUCING THE CALENDAR.
these questions *".... Justinian placed the reply of the Pope among
the laws of the empire, in the second edition of his Code of laws
published in the year 534. During the last year of his life, the
church of France was disturbed, by the scandalous life of Contu-
meliosus, bishop of Eeez. St. Cesar, bishop of Aries, and the other
prelates of the province examined the charges and sent a report of
the testimony to Pope John II. This was in 534. He at once
pronounced sentence against the bad bishop, deposing him from
the see he had so disgraced. He sent him to a monastery to do
penance for his sins, and at the same time he commanded St. Ce-
sar to appoint an administrator of the vacant See of Reez, till the
death of the deposed bishop. The latter appealed, but John II.
died and his successor St. Agapitus confirmed the sentence of his
predecessor.
St. Agapitus, son of Gordianus, was an archdeacon of the Eoman
church. Because of his remarkable learning and his holiness, he
was the elect of the whole Roman clergy at the death of John II.
Before his time they used to date the years from the appointment
of the consuls, and the dates of the chief historic events become so
mixed, that it was getting almost impossible to tell when they
took place. The Roman empire, swept away by the arms of the
barbarians from the North, had so complicated the reckoning of
the years, that events could not be accurately computed. Dennis
the Little was appointed by the Pope to carry out the cycle of St.
Cyril, which ended in the year 531. Agapitus conceived the idea
of reckoning events the from birth of our Lord. Dennis spent liis
wholelifein this great work. Under Pope Agapitns the •whole world
received the calendar of the Roman church. To him the human
race is indebted for the christian era or mode of counting the years
from the birth of Christ. On learning of his consecration, the
empei'or Justinian sent him his profession of his faith, and asked
that the converted Arians might be allowed to keep their ciiurches;
that Achilles, bishop of Larissa, be received in place of Epiphanius
of Constantinople, and that the vicariate of lllyria be changed to
Justiniana, a city which Justinian was then building in Dardania.
In his reply the Pope refused to recognize the holy orders of the
Arians as valid quoting an ancient canon against it. He appointed
legates to examine the matter of bishop Achilles, and deferred the
other questions. With the emperor's letter came to the Pope came
also the acts of a council of the 200 bishops of Africa Jissem bled
at Carthage, under the presidency of their metropolitan archbishop
Reparatus. Before deciding the question of admitting converts
from Arianism into the church, and whether they should be bap-
tized over again at their conversion, the bishops of that council
wished to submit the question to the decision of the Bishop of
Rome.
Agapitus decided that tlie converted Arian bishops could not be
given jurisdiction, but directed that they live as laymen and be
> Ibidem p. IZT.
THE POPE IN EXILE. 237
supported from the revenues of their churches, because their orders
were invalid, also deciding that the Arian converts could not be
ordained to the ministry. He went to Constantinople to ask aid
of the emperor against the persecutions of Theodatus then ravag-
ing Italy. There he deposed the Anthimus, the Entychian bishiop
of Constantinople, who had been uTilawfully raised to that see by the
empress Theodora. While in Constantinople, the churches of the
East asked his aid against the Eutychians, who continued to
teach their false doctrines. The death of the Pope in the imper-
ial city soon after put a stop to the good work for the quieting of
the East. He had the greatest funeral ever seen up to that time.
His remains were brought to Kome, and laid beside those of his
predecessors in the crypt of St. Peter's church.
Having heard of the death of Agapitus at Constantinople
King Theodatus brought about the consecration of the deacon
Sylverius, not allowing the clergy of Rome to vote. But seeing
that they would be forced into submission the Eoman clergy
ratified the choice in June 536. The new Pope proved himself
no tool in the handa of a bad king. He was a worthy successor
of the noble Pontiffs who preceded him. Theodora, empress of
Justinian, wished to place on the Chair of Peter, a Pope who-
would admit the Eutychians to the communion of the church, re-
store Anthemus to the see of Constantinople and reject the coun-
cil of Chalcedon. For that reason she sent as delegate to Vigilius
a deacon, who when he arrived at Rome found that Sylvei-ius had
been elected to the Pontificate, and the project fell to the ground.
When Sylverius would not yield to Theodora's wishes and re-
store Anthimus to the see of Constantinople, Theodore notified
Belisarius, Justinian's general commander in Italy, who invaded
the country near Rome and persecuted the Pope. Then the
bishop of Patrata started for Constantinople to boldly upbraid
and condemn Justinian, for the way he had allowed his forces
in Italy to treat Sylverius the head of the church. The em-
peror thep ordered that the Pontiff be at once sent back to
Rome, but the Pope was seized on his way back by Belisarius
and died in exile on the Island of Palmaria.
After having been stripped of his pontifical robes by Belisarius,
the emperor's general in Italy, who was moved to this by the lies
and calumnies heaped on him by his enemies and thus driven
into exile, the deacon Vigilius called a meeting of the clergy of
Rome to elect a Pope in the place of the exiled Pontiff. Fright-
ened by threats, or rather bribed by diverse influences, they
elected Vigilius himself on Nov. 22 in 537. When the deposed
Sylverius was on his way back to Rome, Vigilius was considered
as a usurper, but on the death of the real Pope Sylverius, the elec-
tion of Vigilius was made valid by the action of the Roman clergy.
Thus his accession at first, while the Pope lived, was irregular and
invalid, but it became valid and regular at his death by the ac-
tion of the electors. Although the ruler of Italy, Belisarius,
238 SETTLING DISPUTES.
thought he had a willing tool in Vigilins, he soon found he was
mistaken, for the Popes from the very beginning of the church
are animated with a different spirit when sitting on the everlast-
ing throne of Peter, than they were before being raised to that
highest office of earth. The Holy Spirit fills them with wisdom
for the government of the universal church.
Vigilius as Pope soon repaired his failings as a deacon. He
wrote two letters, one to' the emperor Justinian, the other to
Mennas, patriarch of Constantinople, declaring his faith and
policy to be the same as that of Sts. Celestin, Leo, John, and his
other great predecess^^ors. He again confirmed the four general
coun-cils of the church and condemned the Eutychians, Arians
and especially Anthemus, who persisted in holding the see of Con-
stantinople against the wishes of the Holy See. Both the empress
and Justinian wished to retain this bishop iheir tool at the seat
of their great government. In 547 Vigilius came to Constanti-
nople, at the earnest request of Justinian, to settle the dispute
among the bishops of the Orient relating to the matter contained
in the Three Chapters. His first act was to condemn the patri-
arch Mennas, and excommunicate the Eutychians. Calling a
council of 70 bishops he then examined and coudemned the
Tiiree Chapters. He wrote to Aurelius bisiiop of Aries, his legate,
asking him to warn all the bishops not to give heed to any of the
reports, which they hear, as lie held to the faith of his predecessors
in the Roman See.
'During the Pontificate of Vigilius Pelagius was a deacon of the
Roman church. He took part in the condemnation of the Three
Chapters, and this brought on him the most atrocious slanders,
which alienated from him the clergy and people of Rome, so that
John of Perugia and Bunus only took part in his consecration.
He rooted out simony then prevalent in many parts of the
church. Wiien some of the bishops of Italy, with blind zeal ex-
communicated Narces, the lieutenant of the emperor Justinian,
Pope Pelagius revoked it and commended and praised Narces. He
wrote and corrected the false opinions of the bishops Of Tuscany.
Pelagius dyijig on March 26, 559, while building the church of
the Twelve Apostles, John III. came to the chair His first act was
to ratify what his predecessors had done. He condemned the
errors of the emperor Justinian and his followers. The latter
claimed that Christ's body could not suffer, and that his passion
was not real. The emperor himself banished St. Eutychius patri-
arch of Constantinople, and issued a decree forcing all the bi>»ho])8
of the empire to subscribe to this peculiar faith. When Justinian
the emperor died Nov. 14th, 5GG, his niece Sophia took the reins
of government. She insulted Nares her lieutenant in Italy who,
at once invited Alboin, king of the Lombards, to invade Italy,
which he at once conquered. With his whole army he was an
Arian, not believing in the divinity of Christ. From this fatal
error the Popes again delivered Italy.
THE ENGLISH AS SLAVES. 239
When John III. died July 13, 572 the throne of the Fisherman
remained vacant ten months, because the Lombards, besieging
Eome, prevented the meeting of the Roman clergy. Chosroes
was devastating Syria; the Arian king of the Visigoths were per-
secuting the catholics of Spain; France was the seat of civil wars.
St. Leander the fearless bishop of Seville Spain, after living
in banishment, established churches and monasteries. The cath-
olic faith was then prescribed in many countries.
Such was the condition of the christian world when on May
16th, 573, Benedict was selected by the Roman clergy. He at
once chose the deacon Gregory to the office of archdeacon of the
Roman church. Tlie latter belonging to a senatorial family was
of the highest nobility of Rome. Feeling himself called to the
church, he resigned his pretorian dignity to enter tlie religious
life. The house of his uncle, where for generations his family had
lived on the Celian hill shaded by the lofty pine trees, tliis
palace he turned into the monastery of St. Andrew for the pious
disciples whom he gathered around him. Taking a walk in Rome
one day, he saw among the slaves for sale in the slave market a
number of men and women of light fair complexion. Struck with
their intelligent looks and their great beauty, he asked where
tliey were from. Tiiey told him they were from pagail England
in Latin Angles. "Not Angles '' lie said "but they are like Angels."
With a sigh that such a noble looking people should be buried in
paganism, he begged of Pope Benedict to send him to England
foi'tlie conversion of that nation. Touched with his great zeal
the Pope gave liis consent, and Gregory with thirty followers set out
at once. When he had gone as far as the foot of the Alps on his
mission for the conversion of England, a messenger came with or-
ders to return for the Romans had rebelled at the departure of
one so great and famous a churchman from their midst. The
great archdeacon returned, and for years looked after the affairs of
the Roman church.
When Benedict died July 31st, 577 the choice of a Pontiff fell on
a monk who took the name of Pelagius IL Having come to an
arrangement with the Lombards, who at that time had conquered
Italy, Pelagius recalled his legate the deacon Gregory from the
seat^f the empire at Constantinople, and directed him to write in
his name to the bishops of the province of Istria, who refused to
abide by the decisions of the Roman Pontiffs, and of the fifth gen-
eral council. When they would not submit they were called to
Ravenna where arguments convinced them.
At this time what is now France was composed of many little
nations, often hostile to their neighbors, and many councils were
held by which the framework of the present nation was laid down.
St. Gregory of Tours was then the master spirit of all these coun-
cils and reforms. When Sagetarius and Salonius, bishops of Gap
and Embrun, gave up their see to take part in bloody wars,
they were deposed by the council of Lyons held in 5C7, but Pope
240 GREGORY AS DEACON.
Paul III. restored them. But not reforming, again they were de-
graded from the episcopacy. When the troubles of the East cul-
minated in the council held at Antioch, June 589, against Greg-
ory, patriarch of Antioch, John the Faster sat chairman of the
council. This John had usurped the title of Ecumenical bishop,
that is universal bishop. At once Pelagius II. wrote to Constanti-
nople, and annulled the whole council. He then reviewed all that
Popes Julius, Celestine, Innocent and Leo, had proclaimed to the
christian world regarding the authority of the Bishop of Rome
over the whole church, and he forbade his legate St. Gregory to
have anything to do with John the Faster patriarch of Constanti-
nople. This Pope died Feb. 8th, 590.
Gregory the deacon was the directing mind of Peter's bark in
the time of tiie utmost dangers and difliculties. The patriarch of
Constantinople claimed to be the chief of the East. The Lombards
had invaded Italy, England was pagan, France was torn by civil
wars, Europe lay bleeding from the fire of the sword of the bar-
barians of the north. Gregory's house turned into a monastery
stood on the Celian hill. Hisfamily had given her greatest son to
Rome. His fame as a preaclier had filled all Rome, and his homi-
lies or explanations of the Bible had attracted all minds. The
clergy, the senators and the people of Rome were unanimous in
their choice. On Sept. 3d Gregory ascended the spiritual
throne of Christ, although he tried to escape the great and
heavy burden. In the words of Bossuet, " the great Pope ap-
peases the age with his prayers, he teaches kings and emperors, he
consoles Africa, encourages Spain, converts the Arians, sends mis-
sionaries to England, restores discipline in France, conciliates the
Lombards, saves Italy and Rome from being conquered, crushes
the growing pride of the patriarchs of Constantinople, teaches the
whole church by his learning, rules both the East and the West by
vigorous hands, and before his death he brings back the whole
christian world to the customs of the apostolic age." Even to our
day we feel the power of the wise and vigorous measures he enact-
ed for the discipline of the church. He reformed and collected
into one book the prayers said at Mass, he codified the rites of ad-
ministering the sacraments, he reformed the music of the church,
and founded schools all over the world. He took the most remark-
able care of the thirty missionaries, whom he sent to England to
convert her from paganism. They came from the monastery of St.
Andrew which he had ruled on the Celian hill in the home of his-
forefathers. Gregory the Great died March 12th 604 in his 64th
year.
At the pontificate of Gregory I. began a new epoch in the history
of the church. At this time the most deadly principles afflicted
society. The great Roman empire was tottering ready to fall,
the primal principles of morality had been undermined, paganism
was dying out, and festering corruption had everywhere sapped the
foundations of law, order, peace and prosperity.
APOSTOLIC MAKTYKS AND LEGISLATORS. 341
But the world began to feel a new power, the supernatural,
above and superior to any they had ever felt before. It was the
Papacy. The gates of hell had not prevailed. That universal
authority of the Bishops of Rome from the days of the apostles,
rising above all other authorities, extending to every part of the
known world, bound peoples, nations, tribes and tongues into one
solid body the church catholic. From the days of Peter to those
of Melchiades, the Popes had resisted the gates of hell even unto
most cruel deaths, for without a single exception they all died as
martyrs, offering their sufferings, their blood and their lives, as
witnesses of the realities of the truths they taught the world.
From Melchiades to Gregory the Great, they laid down the
written laws of the church, which became the foundations of
christian society. " The first were apostolic martyrs, the latter
apostolic lawgivers." ' The first epoch saw sowed the seeds of the
ruin.
In France the archbishops of Aries had it seems been appointed
of the Roman empire while the second epoch saw laid the founda-
tions of modern christian society, whichrose totake the place of
paganism. Up to this time the Popes were teachers and lawgivers
now they appear as real sovereigns, that is as Bishop of Rome, as
bishop of the universal church, as temporal ruler, Gregory first
put on the tiara, the triple crown representing this triple power.
When in 604 Gregory went down to the tomb of his fathers, for
five months the Roman See remained vacant, ruled by the clergy
of Rome. Sept. 1st they elected Sabenian, the apostolic nuncio at
Constantinople. He first commanded that bells be rung to call
the people to the canonical hours. His pontificate lasted only six
months as he died Feb. 22, 605.
Boniface III. was nuncio at the court of Constantinople, when
on Feb. 25, 605 he was selected in the place of Sabenian. He had
before his election sent to represent Gregory at the imperial court
because he was of the highest merit. The encroachments of the
proud Constantinople, and of the Greek empire had given rise to
numerous difficulties. Before the time of Constantine, the little
city of Byzantium, nestled on the banks of the strait leading to
the Black Sea. There Constantine built the great city which
still bears his name. Till it became the seat of his empire, the
bishop of Byzantium was only a suffragan bishop, subject to the
archbishop of Heraclea. Now a new trouble arose for the Roman
Pontiff. In 606 the archbishop of Constantinople claimed to be
universal bishop. Eighty years before the great Justinian, emperor
of Constantinople and of the Greek empire, had declared that only
the Bishop of Rome was "the Head of all the holy Churches, the
first of all the bishops." The emperor Phocas again ratified the
decree proclaimed to the world by his predecessor Justinian.
Boniface foresfieing the difficulties raised in the proud city, on the
Bosphorus, religious trouble which afterwards culminated in the
' Darras Hist, of the Church Vol. II. p. 195.
242 THE TRUE CROSS.
Greek schism, called a council at Rome, where he regulati-d the
manner of electing his successors.
After his death the Roman See was vacant 10 months, when
on Sept. 18th, 614 Boniface IV. was elected. He was connected
with the imperial court at Constantinople, and to him Phocas
gave the Pantheon at Rome, which he dedicated to the Virgin and
to all the saints. From that time the feast of All Saints has been
held on the 1st of Nov. each year. Miletus, first bishop of London,
England, seeing the English church divided on the question as to
the time to celebrate Easter, he set out to visit Pope Boniface,
who called a council on the matter. On his return to England
St. Miletus brought back to England the decision of the Pope re-
garding Easter and matters relating to monastic life, besides let-
ters to Lawrence archbishop of Canterbury, to king Ethelbert,
and to the clergy and people of the whole English nation. On
his return in England in 610 he laid the foundations of West-
minster Abbey, on a marsh on the west banks of the Thames,
hence the name, — minster being the old Saxon for monastery, lie
dedicated it to St. Peter, in memory of the great church at Rome
built by Constantine on the Vatican, while he dedicated his cathe-
dral to St. Paul, whose body rests with that of St. Peter under
the great church in Rome, where St. Miletus was born and reared.
Under the pontificate of Boniface two important councils were
held, one at Paris and the other at Toledo, enacting laws relating
to important matters of discipline.
In May 614 Boniface IV. died and Deusdedit ascended the throne.
A storm now arose in the English church. When in 616 king
Ethelbert died, Eadbald his son, a pagan of bad morals, refused
the religion of Christ, and the people, led by his bad example fell
back again to heathenism. Saberet the first christian king of
Essex banished St. Miletus first bishop of London, but the death
of Saberet and the conversion of Eadbald paved the way for the
return of Miletus. Deusdedit died in 617 and was succeeded by
Boniface V.
Chosroes II. king of Persia, carried away the cross on which
Christ was crucified, but it was reconquered by emperor Ileraclius
and restored to Jerusalem. As a remembrance of this event,
each year the church celebrates the restoration of the true cross
on the 14th of Sept. At this time rose Mohammedanism the great-
est enemy of the christian religion. The teachings of Zoroaster,
the religion of the Jews, the paganism of the gentiles, the Gospel
of Christ, these four religions had been for centuries preached
side by side in the East, when Mohammed the father of fanaticism
began to bind them into one form of belief, teaching with fire
and sword that " there is but one God and Mohammed is his
Prophet. " The eloquence and the genius of this wonderful man
carried all before him. From the fragments of the four religions
mentioned, he formed a new religion the greatest foe of the
church. Brought down from heaven by the archangel Ga-
THE ENGLISH CHURCH APPEALS TO ROME. 243
brlel the Koran he claimed was the revealed repository of
his teachings. It was received by them as an inspired book, and to
this day among them it takes the place of the Bible. In ten years
Mohammed had spread his teachings from the Persian gnlf to the
Red Sea. and from the Euphrates to the Nile. In after ages his fol-
lowers spread over the cradle lands of the faith, and Rome alone
excepted, they destroyed every episcopal see established by the
apostles. Under the influence of the Koran, industry was des-
troyed, women degraded, the fields lay untilled, commerce was
smothered and all progress of the race uprooted.
During this time the English church called on the Roman
Pontiff for his protection.' St. Justus and king Ethelbold wrote
the Pope about the difficulty of keeping the English people in
the faith. To him Boniface replied in a kind letter, congratulat-
ing him on his apostolic labors, and he sent him the pallium the
insignia of an archbishop, and gave him power to consecrate bish-
ops. Edwin V. king of Northumbria, wishing to wed Edilburga,
daughter of Ethelbald, promised to allow her to practice the
catholic faith, as we require now in mixed marriages. To him
Boniface V. wrote consenting, besides sending him presents for
himself and for his intended queen.
Under his pontificate was held the council of Rheims, where
the last remains of paganism was rooted out of France. Under
him flourished St. Anastasius of Mount Sinai, who first wrote a
book of controversy in that concise mode of argument called the
scholastic method, which has since become the form both of di-
vinity and of philosophy in all the schools of the church. Then
flourished the great St. Isidore of Seville in Spain, John Mos-
chus of Rome author of the Spiritual Meddow, and a host of
Avonderful men, who illustrated this epoch with their writings.
Their devotion to the Bishop of Rome was wonderful. But we
have only space for the words of St. Isidore of Seville in his pref-
ace to his collection of the old canons of the church. "To the
canons of the councils, we add the decrees of the Roman Pontiffs,
because their authority, standing upon the supremacy of the Apos-
tolic See, is unquestionable. ""^ Boniface V. died in 625.
When Honorius succeeded Boniface, Mohammed ism, before
.confined to Arabia, had reached Jerusalem and threatened the
ruin of the holy city. The new Pope was called to settle the dis-
putes relatina: to the Three Chapters, which he accomplished by
deposing Fortunatus, archbishop of Gradi, because he led a re-
bellious faction against the republic of Venice, which had been
established by the fishermen, who had generations before fled
from the horrors of Attila: "The scourge of God." The republic,
weak because of its small extent and population, turned to the
Pope their father for protection. To them the Pope wrote: "This
is a crime hateful to both God and man. We therefore beg that
as soon as you have restored Adaloald to the throne of his fathers,
» Darras Vol. II. p. 210. =* Darras Hist, of the Church. Vol. II. p. 213.
244 TRIED TO DECEIVE THE POPE.
you will send those bishops to Eome, that we may treat their case
in due form of law. " '
The reign of Honorius was distributed by the intrigues of Ser-
gius, archbishop and patriarch of Constantinople. ** The New
Rome "as they liked to call it, Constantinople the seat of the
Roman empire, the chief city of the world, filled with wealth and
power, was ever jealous of old Rome, the seat of the Pontiffs.
Constantinople was the mother of heresy, as Rome was the mother
of Christianity. Macedonius, its bishop, gave rise to a heresy,
holding that the Holy Ghost was a creature. Nestorius bishop
of the same city claimed that Christ had two persons. Euty-
ches, one of her archabbots taught that Christ had only one na-
ture. Now Sergius held that Christ had only one will. The
emperor favored and protected the heresy. To all the bishops of
the East, Sergius sent forged letters purporting to have been
written by Pope Vigilius favoring the error. He secured as his
followers the archbishops of the two great sees of Antioch and of
Alexandria, and they spread the heresy among the churches both
of Asia and Africa. Sophronius bishop of Jerusalem alone op-
posed the error. Sergius sent a guileful letter to Pope Honorius,
stating that the emperor had asked him if any of the fathers had
taught that Christ had only one will: " I answered him yes. and
sent him a letter written by Mennas patriarch of Constantinople
to your predecessor Vigilius," «&c. He complains to the Pope
about the monk Sophronius, patriarch of Jerusalem, who teaches
that there are two wills in Christ, that the dispute is of little in-
terest, and does not hurt the faith. Yet it threatened to divide
he East into two hostile camps.
The Pontiff, not seeing the crafty design of Sergius, and believing
that the error would soon die out wrote him a nice reply, commend-
ing his zeal. He did so wishing to leave the question to the dis-
putes of grammarians, rather than disturb the church by a formal
discussion. He little saw that it was to become one of the most dan-
gerous heresies of the early church. But St. Sophronius called a
council at Jerusalem, which defined that Christ had two wills, the
will of God and the will of man. Pope Honorius looked on this meet-
ing at Jerusalem as tending to stir up discord. He at once wrote to
all the bishops of the world warning them not to create disputes and
divisions saying: " We acknowledge that the two natures in Jesus
Christ act and operate, each with the participation of the- other,
the divine nature operates what is of God, the human what is of
man, without division, without confusion, without a change of
the divine nature into man, or of the human nature into God. "
St. Sophronius, archbishop of Jerusalem, sent his chief suffra-
gan, Stephen bishop of Dora, to Rome to warn the Pontiff, and
to explain to him the disturbed state of the Eastern churclies.
But Stephen reached Rome only to find Honorius dead," while
St. Sophronius who sent him died before Stephen returned to
» In 637. Darras p. 216. » 658.
HAS CHRIST ONE OR TWO WILLS ? 246
Jerusalem. Stephen lived to see Jerusalem captured by Omar,
the leader of the fanatical Mohammedans, the crescent, the emblem
of the false prophet, planted on the top of Calvary, the name and
worship of Christ driven from the holy city, while Stephen only
had time to carry the cross on which Christ had been crucified lo
Rome, there to lay it before the feet of Pope Honorius. With the
exception of about one century from 1099 to 1187 Jerusalem has
since been under the yoke of the Mohammedans. About this time
Honorius sent Birinus to convert the warlike inhabitants of Wes-
sex, England, and he fixed his see at Dorchester, of which he was
the first bishop. Honorius died in 638.
A vacancy of 18 months now elapsed before Severinus was
elected in his place. During this interregnum, the emperor, wish-
ing to end the disputes about the wills in Christ, issued a royal
decree to his whole empire, saying he did not countenance one or
two operations in Christ, but that in him all operations were
ruled by the same divine Word incarnate, thus favoring the Mon-
othelites. A council of the Asiatic bishops met at Constantinople,
where they favored the decree of the emperor, thus crowning the
intrigues of the patriarch Sergius, who died in the same year 639.
Tlie imperial troops then sacked the Lateran palace of the Popes,
and robbed the papal Treasury, sending a part of the spoils to
Constantinople. The emperor hearing that Severinus had been
elected, refused to confirm him till he had signed the new decree
about the operations in Christ. The emperor sent deputies to
Rome for that purpose. They said to the Pontiff? " The church
of Rome has received the prerogative of settling questions of faith,
she cannot then receive her faith from any other." The Pope re-
mained firm and the emperor gave in. His first pontifical act
was to call a council at Rome and condemn the Monothelites and
the emperor's decree. He died in 640 and John IV. took his place.
The question whether Christ had one or two wills still agitated
the world, and John called a council, wherein the one will error
was again condemned. Pope John made this decree known to
Phyrus patriarch of Constantinople, and he condemned the ob-
stinacy of those who upheld the cause of error. Heraclius, re-
gretting the stand he had taken in the controversy, wrote the Pope
retracting and laying the blame on the dead patriarch Sergius.
While these were taking place, the Mohammedans were overrunning
Egypt and burning the great Library of Alexandi'ia, for months
using the greatest works of human genius to warm the 4000 baths
used there at that time. The loss of the human race of these
great works can never be repaired, as numberless books were
then lost. Among them was destroyed the original Septuagint
copy of the Bible, quoted so often by our Lord himself in the
Gospels. At this time Constantinople seemed the seat of every
error, and her patriarchs in pride and power often fought the
Bishops of Rome, while the latter gave a wonderful firmness in
resisting errors so prolific in the Greek mind.
246 TROUBLES IN CONSTANTINOPLE.
In 642 John IV. died and Theodore I. ascended in his place. Hi?
first act was to define that Christ had two wills. He demanded
that the edict of the emperor be revoked. He condemned the
teachings of the Monotiielites. But a new champion of the truth
appeared at Constantinople in the person of the monk Maximus,
whose lofty conceptions and masterly eloquence in the cause of
Christ, and his explanations of his two natures bore everything be-
fore him as he preached in fiery words to the cultured citizens of
the capitol. He writes against the heresy. He defends the
Popes and their dogmatic decisions. He publicly discusses the
agitated questions with Phyrus, the banished patriarch of Con-
stantinople. Even the heretics admitted that the decisions of the
Popes ended every disputed question, but they tried to prove that
the Popes taught their own false doctrines. When couvinced of
the meanings of the Pope's letters, Phyrus archbishop of Con-
stantinople candidly replied: "My predecessor misunderstood
the Pontiff's words, I ask pardon for him and for myself. Ignor-
ance was the cause of our error .... I shall prove my sincerity at
the tomb of the holy apostles, at the feet of the Sovereign Pon-
tiffs." * Asking Maximus to go with him, Phyrus the exiled pa-
triarch of the first see after Rome, went to Rome and there at
the feet of the Pontiff Theodorus I. he made his profession of faith.
The Pope had hoped to restore him to his see, but his profession
of faith did not last long. He again fell into the same errors and
was deposed by the Pope in a council held in Rome in 648.
The emperor now forbade any further discussion of the question
of one or two wills in Christ. The bishops of Asia wrote ta
Pope Theodorus relating to Paul patriarch of Constantinople, suc-
cessor of Phyrus saying: " If Paul continues to dissemble, it be-
longs to your Apostolic See by its authority to cut him off from
the body of the church. " The Pope then deposed him, as he
would not submit, but the emperor sustained him in the see of
Constantinople. Theodorus died in 649, and Martin I. rose in his
place.
Martin had been a legate of the Holy See at the emperor^s court
at Constantinople, and now the latter claimed the right of con-
firming or of rejecting the choice of the clergy of Rome to the
Chair of Peter. The first act of the Pontiff was to call a council
in the Lateran palace, where 105 bishops assembled from nearly all
parts of the world.
St. Martin I, opened the council with a statement giving his
reasons why he called the council. Speaking from the "ambo, "
he told them of the controversy about the one or two wills of
Christ; how it still disturbed the world; how the emperor upheld
the error; that Phyrus and Paul for teaching it had been by his
predecessors in the Roman See deposed from the patriarchate of
Constantinople; that letters had poured in from all parts of the
world to the Holy See about the error, and yet Constantinople
'Darraa Hist. Church Vol. IL p. 228.
THE POPE CONDEMNS THE EMPEROR. 347
upheld the false doctrines that Christ had only one will. Original
documents were then read; five sessions were held, and Pope
Martin set forth the catholic doctrine in 20 canons, clearly defin-
ing the two natures of Christ united in one Person of the Word of
God. — He clearly defined the two wills in Christ, and condemned
all contradicting doctrines. The Bishop of Rome signed the de-
crees in these words: " I Martin, by the grace of God, Bishop of
the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of the city of Rome,
have signed as Judge, this definition, which confirms the orthodox
faith" &c. The bishops who could not come to the council also sent
their signatures and assent.
As the decree condemned not only the bishop of Constantinople,
but also the emperor and the government, it was translated into
Greek, and sent to both the Eastern and Western churches. Know-
ing the difficulty of treating with the Greeks of the imperial city,
St. Martin sought the aid of Clovis II. king of the Franks, ask-
ing him for bishops of his realm to be sent as legates of the Holy
See to Constantinople, as they would be more independent in
treating with the acute Greek minds, whom he had learned to
know so well during his residence at Constantinople as legate of
the Apostolic See. But the French king's ministers were at that
time bishops and clergymen, and they neglected the duty, and the
Pope sent the decrees direct to Constantinople. He nominated
John bishop of Philadelphia as his Vicar, directing him to appoint
only true believers to the Episcopal sees of the East, then torn by
heresy. He wrote fatherly letters to the bishops of the old apostolic
sees of Antioch and of Jerusalem, exhorting them to bear up against
the inroads of the Mohammedans. Paul bishop of Thessalonica
sent to Rome his profession of faith, but St. Martin found it taint-
ed with the error of the only one will heresy. Paul would not re-
tract, and Pope St. Martin deposed him from the episcopal office.
Constans the new emperor of Constantinople -believed in the
one will error. Finding himself incapable of preventing the
voice of the Bishop of Rome reaching to the uttermost ends of
the earth, defining that Christ had two wills, the will of God and
the will of man, the emperor sent his chamberlain, Olympius to
murder the Pontiff, who attempted to doit when the Pope was
giving Holy Communion. But he could not find courage, or as
writers say, divine Providence shielded his Vicar, who later forgave
the crime. To carry out his bad design, the emperor accused the
Pope of not honoring the Virgin, of favoring the Mohammedans,
and of treachery to the empire, and he sent Calliopis with a band
of soldiers, who carried the Pope forcibly to Constantinople, where
he was imprisoned 13 months. Both on the journey and in the
city he loaded him with insults. '^IMie Pope was banished to the
Thauric, Chersonese, where in 655, he died a martyr to the doc-
trine, he ever taught, that Christ had not one, but two wills. "We
have given these details to show that the Popes were not upheld by
any authority of the Roman empire, but that the emperor, the people
248 THE EMPEROR PERSECUTES THE CHURCH.
and even the bishops of Constantinople nearly always opposed the
Bishops of Rome.
While St. Martin was in exile, Eugenius as his vicar ruled the
church of Rome. On the death of the former, the latter was
elected to the supreme ^Pontificate. Archbishop -Peter, who suc-
ceeded Phyrus in the see of Constantinople, sent the new Pope
the usual letter of communion with the Roman See. It was full
of the one Avill error, and the Pope rejected it. The emperor con-
tinued to persecute the church. He banished the monk Maximus
and his two companions to Thrace, because they would not change
their doctrine, Avhich they assumed up in these words of the dis-
ciple of Anastasius: " We do not yield our firm belief, that
according to the promise made to Peter, the seed of faith will
remain at least in the Roman Church. " Such has ever been the
way the laity have tried to control t.'ie church and persecuted the
clergy, when they could not.
After t\vo years of a pontificate, Eugenius died and St. Vitalian
filled his place. The day of Justice had come for Constans II.,
who had persecuted the Papacy. He murdered his brother
Theodsius then a priest, from whose hand he had but a few days
before received Holy Communion. The crime aroused all Con-
stantinople, and the emperor was forced to fly. He then cap-
tured some of the cities of Italy, entered Rome, plundered her
churches, set out for Sicily and entered Syracuse. There he per-
suaded Maurus archbishop of Ravenna to declare himself inde-
pendent of the Pope, depending only on the emperor. St.
Vitalian summoned him to Rome, and not obeying the Pope ex-
communicated him, and he died in that state. Repar.itus his
successor hastened to return to the church. An officer murdered
the emperor in 668. His son Constantine IV. succeeding him.
He professed the catholic faith and gave peace to tiie church at
least in the Greek empire.
During this time the English church gave great promise. Her first
bishops, who came from Rome were most devoted to her Pontiffs.
The priests of Ireland had spread the faith into nearly every part
of Europe, wbich before had been overrun by the baibarians of
central Asia, but who had spared Ireland from their depreciations.
Some of the early bishops of Europe came from the East, and
they introduced the Jewish customs, especially about Easter, taught
them by St. John the Evangelist into England. In 664 a notable
meeting was held in the monastery of Streaneshalch which was
attended by the three bishops Colman, Cedde, Agilbert and king
Oswiu. There they decreed to follow the Roman custom of cele-
brating Easter on the first Sunday following the fourteenth moon of
March, as St. Peter had commanded at Rome, and concluded to give
up the Jewish custom taught by St. John the Evangelist to the
churches in Asia minor. To bind still better the English people to
the Roman See, king Oswiu sent Vigard bishop elect of the pri-
mal English see of Canterbury to Rome, to be consecrated by the
A GREAT BISHOP IN ENGLAND. 249
Pope, but he dying on the way, the Pope wrote a beautiful letter
to the English king, thanking him for his gifts, praising him
for his zeal and devotion to the Eoman See, and presented him
with across made of a part of the iron which had bound St. Peter
in prison. ' He also sent St. Theodore^^once a philosopher of
Athens, as archbishop of Canterbury. Wonderful were the works
of religion and of civilization undertaken by St. Theodore, and the
monks who came with him from Rome to England. In the year
673, he called a council of the English church at Canterbury,
where they introduced salutary measures for the government of
the church. He founded a famous school at Canterbury, where
the sons of England at that time were educated, and the
English nation soon saw that the words of the Pope were realized
in his letter to the king, when he promised to send a " learned and
pious man, a bishop adorned with every virtue. "
In a council held at Eome in 667 the Pope reinstated John
bishop of Lappa in Crete, unjustly deposed by his archbishop
Paul, and the Pope declared null and void the decrees of a coun-
cil held by the bishops of Crete. St. Vitalian died in 072, and
Adeodatus, a benedictine monk of St. Erasmus Rome, was selected
in his place. He confirmed to the republic of Venice the right
to elect their presidents, who were called doges; he ratified the
privilege given by Crotpert bishop of Tours to the monastery of
St. Martin, by which the monks became free from the jurisdic-
tion of the bishop, and he first used these words: " Health and apos-
tolic blessing." He died in 676.
St. Domnus, a citizen of Eome, was the choice of the Roman cler-
gy. He received into the church archbishop Raparatus, successor
of the heretical Maurus in the see of Ravenna, and that gave the
death blow to the schism raised by the emperor Constans II. At
this time came into prominence the Maronites. Taking their
name from St. Maro of St. Chrystom's time, they guarded their
faith and their devotion to the Roman See, living in the caves and
fastnesses of the Libanan Mountains during the storms of the Mo-
hammedan persecutions. They live even to our day, still holding
the pure faith of the church as taught them by their first bishop
John Maro sent to them by St. Martin I., vicar of the Holy
See and bishop of Philadelphia.
Some of the patriarch archbishops of Constantinople were good
catholics, while others believed in the one will error. Such dis-
tractions forced the emperor Constantine Pogonatus in 666 to ask
the Pope to call the VI. general council at Constantinople. But
before Constantine's letter reached Rome, Domnus had died and
the letter was handed to St. Agatho, a benedictine monk selected
June 26th, 679.
When the embassadors of the emperor Constantine arrived at
Rome with the letters to the Pope, th«y found that a council had
been called by the Bishop of Rome to inquire into the unjust de-
> Acts.
250 THE SIXTH GENERAL COUNCIL.
position of St. "Wilfred archbisliop of York, England, who had ap-
pealed to Rome against the proposed division of his archdiocese
by Egfrid the Saxon king. Directed by the Bishop of Rome, the
council annulled all which had been done against him, and the
holy bishop returning to England, presented the judgment of the
Pope to king Egfrid, wno refused to submit. He first imprisoned
St. Egfrid, then banished him from the kingdom, and it was
only at the death of the king in G80 that he could return to his dio-
cese.
The Pope now took up the case of the emperor Constantino
Pogonatus. For that he summoned 100 bishops, who condemned
again the error claiming only one will in Christ. Then he se-
lected the legates of the Holy See at the court of Constantinople
during the VI. general coui'cil, which the Pope had called to meet
the rising errors of that time. In the letter to the emperor, the
Pope says among other things: *' The catholic world looks upon
this Church as the Mother and Mistress of all the other churches
&c." On the arrival of the priests Theodore and George, with the
deacon Joim, legates of the Bishop of Rome, the VI. general
council of the church was called at Constantinople Nov. Tth, 680.
When the council met the bishops of the universal church as-
sembled in the hall of the palace, with the emperor Constantine
present in person, the legates of the Pope at his^ right, the patri-
arch of Constantinople on his left, with the book of the Gospels
in the middle of the hall. The legates speaking first reminded
the emperor of the errors regarding the one will and one opera-
tion in Christ, how it had spread, how the Bishop of Rome had
so often condemned it, how other bishops of the empire and of
the East had upheld it; then they ask the emperor to have- the
teachers of this #alse doctrine show their authorities for it. The
emperor then ordered Macarius, patriarch of Antioch, to explain
the new belief. The latter rose and said that their doctrine of
the one will in Christ had been held and taught by the Popes, by
the councils, by the patriarchs of Alexandria, of Constantinople
and by others. The discussion thus opened before the most dis-
tinguished assembly of the world, took up 18 sessions of the
council. They searched the Scriptures, the Fathers, the tradi-
tions of all churches, the histories of the apostolic converts, every
tradition which could throw light on a subject, which was then
agitating the whole christian world. The imperial library, one
of the greatest of the world, gave them all documents they
wanted. The letter of Pope Agatho condemning the one will
theory was at last read.
No sooner did the bishops hear the clear doctrinal decision of
the Bishop of Rome, than they cried out with one voice: " Peter
has spoken by the mouth of Agatho. We believe with him, that
there are two wills in Jesus Christ. Anathema to him who up-
holds the contrary opinion." All the bishops of the world ac-
knowledged the teachings of the Pope excepting Macarius, patri-
THE ONE WILL ERROK CONDEMNED. 251
iircli of Aiitioch, who remained obstinate in spite of the tears of
his friends and suffragan bishops. He vas then deposed from
his episcopal office. His intimate friend, the monk Stephen,
tried to defend him, but it only aroused the ire of the bisiiops,
who cried out: " The question is cleared up, drive out the heretic."
We must remember that this was in the year 680, and that he
was the bishop of Antioch, where the followers of Christ were
first called christians, and that St. Peter himself had established
that see. All this shows the supreminent power of the Bishop
of Rome before the whole christian world, and before the emper-
or. The bishops closed their labors of many weeks by these
words: " By the inspiration of the Holy Ghost, in agreement
with the dogmatic letter of our Holy Father, the Sovereign Pon-
tiff Agatho, we acknowledge in Jesus Christ two natures, with
two respective wills and acts AVe have followed the teach-
ings of the Pope, as he has followed the traditions of the apostles
and of the fathers. If we have worsted the enemy, the great chief
of the apostles fouglit with us by his imitator and heir, the suc-
cessor to his throne, the Holy Pontiff, whose learning is the glory
of Catholic truth. 0 Prince, thou art the new Constantine arisen
to meet a new Arius, ancient Rome holds out to you a profession
of faith, coming from God himself. A letter from the West has
brought back the light of truth. Peter has spoken by the voice
of Agatho." The bishops of the world then signed the decrees,
and they were sent to Rome for the signature of Agatho. But
the latter died before his legates had returned to Rome and he
was followed by St. Leo II. of Naples.
St. Leo II. examined the decrees of the VI. general council
just ended, which Constantine had sent him with the words:
** To the holy and blessed Leo, Pontiff of Old Rome and ecumen-
ical Pope." St. Leo II. published them to the world, and ratified
them, " with the authority of Peter, " thus giving them the same
authority as the five former general councils. He regulated the
ceremony of the kiss of peace at Mass, and the sprinkling of the
people with holy water. He died in 683.
St. Benedict II., brought up in poverty, Avas elected, and the em-
peror Constantine IV. decreed that the election of the Pope should
not need the confirmation either of the emperor, or of the exarch
of Ravenna. But it was again revived by his son Justinian II.
Benedict II. did all he could to convert Macarius deposed by the
council, so as to restore him to his see of Constantinople, and daily
he sent a learned man to confer with him in Rome. Not yielding,
he was forced to condemn him for his obstinacy in holding that
Christ had only one will. Amid the crumbling and decaying hu-
man institutions of that time, the emperor saw that only the
Papacy and the church would last, and he placed his two sons un-
der the protection of the Pope, who adopted them as his sons.
But Justinian II. showed himself unworthy of his foster father.
St. Benedict II. died in 685.
■«>
252 THE POPE REJECTS AN IRREGULAR COUNCIL.
John, one of the legates of the Pope at the late council of Con-
stantinople was raised to the spiritual throne of Home in the reg-
ular way and independent of politics. But he lived scarcely a
year, being succeeded by Conon, who had to seek the approbation
of Justinian. But he lived only a year and St. Sergius followed
him.
A new division rose in the Roman church— one party tried to elect
Theodore another Paschal, while the clergy, the judges, and the
larger part of the people chose Sergius. Theodore yielded but
Paschal would not. The churches of Spain, of France and of all
Europe subscribed to decrees of the late council of Constanti-
nople. But the latter city, ever liking change, began to show dis-
content under the intrigues of Justinian 11. who wished to rule in
spiritual as well as in political matters. He called a council at
Carthage, which drew up canons suitable to his wishes. This ir-
regular council allowed the ordination of married priests, subjected
the election of Popes to emperor's whims, and passed other disciplin-
ary measures opposed to the whole traditions of the church. When
the canons were sent to Pope Sergius for his approval, he refused
to receive them. That angered the emperor, who sent his officer
Zachary to seize the Pope and bring him to Constantinople. But
the Roman people, remembering the fate of their former Pontiff,
St. Martin, rose and defended their Bishop, and Zachary was
forced to beg the protection of the holy Pontiff. An anti-pope
set up by the lieutenant of the eniperor at Ravenna, forced the
Pope to fly from Rome, and for seven years he lived in exile. On
his return, he took measures for the conversion of Germany and
the people of the north of Europe. He died in 701.
John VI. was the next Bishop of Rome. The new emperor Ti-
berius sent his lieutenant at Ravenna to exact under threats unlaw-
ful measures from John, but the people of Rome again rose to de-
fend him, and Italy ready to throw off the rule of the emperors of
Constantinople, defended the Roman Pontiff. This was the prepa-
ration for the temporal power of the Popes, later given them by
Pepin and increased by Charlemagne, by which they were elevated
above the blighting changes and misfortunes of politics.
In 703 Alcfrid king of Northumberland called the English
bishops to a council at Nesterfield, and before them summoned
St. Wilfred, whom he had banished from his see. St. Wilfred
came and showed them the letters of Pope Agatho, dated 23 years be-
fore, restoring him to his episcopal see of York. But the king de-
manded that he resign. St. Wilfred refused, appealed to the
Holy See, and started for Rome with the embassadors of the bad
king following him. John VI. called a council to examine the
case, and the innocence of St. Wilfred being established, the Pope
sent him back with letters to the king to restore him to York.
John died in 705.
John VII. then took the government of the church universal.
Justinian, restored to his empire, now undertook to force the
H
^^
EC
z
M
H
m
•t
P3
t>
■Jl
o
H
EO
tt
n
•ii
(J
H
Z
a
w
M
c!
5
V,
H
W
CO
Kj
M
O
H
!?;
W
M
W
2
't!
o
W
ff^*
O
ts
>>
254 THE POPE VISITS CONSTANTINOPLE.
Pope to approve the illegal council held at Constantinople. But
John VII. sent back the decrees without reading them saying :
" The council was not lawfully held in the presence of the leg-
ates of the Holy See." John VII. died in 707, and was followed
by Sisinnius, who lived only 20 days, and they elected Constan-
tine of Syria. Justinian II,, seeing that he could not get the Pope's
approval by force, tried trickery, and invited the Pope to Con-
stantinople on the plea of having many things to regulate with
him regarding religion in his vast empire. Accompanied by Ti-
berius the emperor's son, and a great assembly of cardinals and
prelates, the Pope set out for Constantinople, resolved to en-
danger his life for the peace of the church. At their first meet-
ing, crowned as he was with the diadem of the Csesars, the emperor
threw himself before the Pontiff and kissed his feet. They had a
private conversation regarding the rejected council of Constanti-
nople, and the Pope appointed bis deacon Gregory, later his suc-
cessor, to enlighten the emperor regarding the objections against
the illegal council. Gregory soon convinced the emperor of the
faults and errors in the decrees. The emperor thus instructed
was converted, and showered every favor on the Pope, who re-
turned a year later and re-entered Eome his episcopal city.
When in 711 Justinian died, he was succeeded by Bardanes
Philippicus, the leader of a revolution. He believed that Christ
had only one will. He drove every orthodox bishop from his em-
pire, and filled their places by heretical bishops, who believed as he.
Nearly all the Greeks of the East became followei*s of the one will
error. The bad emperor was dethroned, and Anastasius II. suc-
ceeded him. He was a catholic. At his coronation in the historic
church of St. Sophia, the people cried out with one voice: ** We
embrace the faith of the sixth council," He wrote to the Bishop
of Rome his profession of the faith, and the patriarch arclibishop
of Constantinople fallowed his example. Thus the trreek christians
were ever ready for any kind of a change in religion. The Moors
now invaded Spain at the request of Julian of Cent, whose
daughter Roderic, a slave to his passion for her, he had carried
off. For 700 years the Moors held Spain. Constantine died in
715. Up to this time 89 Bishops had sat on Peter's throne, 40
had been chosen from among the Roman clergy or laymen, and
49 came from various other parts of the christian world.
Gregory II. took the helm in times of difficulties. He began by
restoring monastic discipline in Italy; he sent the Sts. George and
Dorotheus to preach to the Bavarians, and he appointed Winfrid
or as he is better known Boniface to convert the Germans, Three
times this Englishman, reared in the monasteries of England, re-
ceived power from the Popes, on his mission of peace to the Ger-
mans. First he came to the Pope with his letters from Daniel his
English bishop to the saintly Gregory, who sent him to convert
the German nation. Again, when he succeeded, he came to the
feet of the Pope, who called him Boniface, that is doing good, and
RELIGIOUS TROUBLES IN THE EAST. 256
consecrated him as the missionary bishop of the Germans. For
the third time he went to Rome to receive the archiepiscopal
pallium of metropolitan of Mayence. To Rome and to her Pontiffs
therefore must the Germans look for their christian faith.
But while the Gospel was spreading over the West, the East was
the seat of internal disturbances, as well as threatened by the fire
and sword of the Mohammedans. Leo III. , son of a poor peasant sat
on the imperial throne of the Cfesars. He raised a storm by claim-
ing that christians worshipped images of Christ and of the saints.
By royal edict, he banished all the images and pictures from the
churches. He banished the bishops who would not obey. He con-
fiscated the gold and silver ornaments of the churches. He burned
even the libraries. The fanaticism of the image breakers was spread-
ing destruction into all the churches of the East, when alone and
unsupported the eloquence of St. John Damascene rose against the
royal decree. He proves by Bible examples the use and custom of
images and pictures. He reproves the emperor for intruding into
religious matters. The emperor then calumniated him and the
Mohammedan Caliph ordered his right hand cut off. The people of
the East looked to Rome for a settlement of the discussions, which
divided the churches of the empire. Gregory II. wrote the emperor
a clear difinition of the use of images in the churches. The emperor
would not he convinced. He sent Marinus to Rome to raise a con-
spiracy against the Pope. The lieutenant of the emperor, seeing-
that the conspiracy did not succeed, that the assassins were arrestedt
and put to death, took up arms against the Pope and advanced on:
Rome. But the Romans flew to arms and defeated the imperial^
forces.
These continual interferences in religious matters, which belong
only to the church and not to the empire, hastened an event of
the greatest importance to the church — the establishment of the
temporal dominions of the Popes, by which they became indepen-
dent of worldly rulers. The people of Rome and of the surrounding
country, seeing Marinus still trying to assassinate the Pope, asked
the latter to take upon himself a temporal dominion, to be their
ruler, so they could raise an army to defend him and the eternal
city from such continual onslaughts. Leo and the king of the
Lombards joined forces and laid siege to Rome. Pope Greg-
ory with his clergy went forth outside the walls, like another St.
Leo confronting Attila, and persuaded the Lombard king that the
capture and the sacking of the eternal city would be
a misfortune for the whole world, that they ought to .unite
against the Mohammedans, then threatening Christendom. Luit-
prand moved to tears, threw himself at the feet of the Pontiff.
Laying aside the vestments of a king, with the Pope he enters St.
Peter's, together they kneel at the tombs of the apostles Sts. Peter
and Paul and there they swear eternal friendship to the church,
and there the king asked pardon, which was then and there
granted. Gregory II. died in 731.
256 THE MOHAMMEDANS THBEATEN CHRISTENDOM.
Five days later Gregory III. was elected, and waiting till they got
the confirmation of the emperor's exarch at Ravenna, he was
crowned. But the emperor still carried on his persecution against
the images and religious pictures in the churches. Under the
guidance of Gregory, the people of Rome, ever given to the fine
arts, adorned the interior of St. Peter's on one side with images of
Ohrist and the apostles, on the other with those of the Virgin and
saints. He wrote an indignant reply to the emperor's threat
to destroy the statue of St. Peter at Rome, and seize the person of
tlie Pontiff. In a second letter the Pope told him he liad no au-
thority in the government of the church, showed him the line divid-
ing the church from tlie state and the priesthood from the empire.
Laying his hand on the keys adorning St. Peter's tomb Charles
Martel, emperor of the French, swore to protect the Holy See and
to allow no one to desecrate the tomb of the great apostle. Greg-
ory gave him a title of Most Christian Prince, a title ever after-
wards born by the kings of France.
At this time the Arabs and Moors, with their Koran, teaching
that all comes to pass by fate, taking away human liberty, degrading
women, blighting industry, stifling advancement, these Mohamme-
■dans overran Europe, and poured in countless hosts into the plains of
Poitiers. There Europe and Asia, the Koran and the Gospel, the
followers of Mohammed and of Christ met, and whether the world
was to be Mohammedan or Christian depended on the result of the
battle. Charles, king of the Franks smote the Sarasans, drove
them back to their arid plains and Christendom was saved. From
that he was called Martel, the Hammer. A messenger loaded
with gifts carried the good news to Gregory III. and told him that
his victorious son Charles would never allow the infidels or the Greek
emperors to insult the Father of the christians. The emperors
of the empire of the East now saw in the powerful Charles, a pro-
tector of the Papacy they had so long persecuted.
The image breakers still went on in the East. The Pope called
a meeting of bishops at Rome, and formally condemned the error,
depriving of Communion and cutting off from the church all
followers of the sect. The emperor Leo would not receive the letters
of the Pope, threw his legate into prison, treated another embassy
the same way, raised a fleet to attack Italy, but it perished in a storm
at sea, and his army was defeated at Ravenna. He stillpersecuted
the church with great vigor both in Italy and in the East. The
Pope now wrote Charles Martel asking him to protect the Holy
See. Tiie French king wrote Luitprand to abstain from hostili-
ties against the Pope. But in 741 died Gregory III., Charles his
defender, and Leo his persecutor.
Now mounts the steps of Peter's throne Zachary, who consulted
no power on earth before his consecration, for the persecutions of
the former rulers had freed the church, from State interference.
He held a friendly meeting with Liutprand, the Lombard king,
who gave back to him many unjustly held cities of Italy. Zacli-
BONIFACE IN GEKMANY. 257
ary restored the discipline of the church in France, disturbed by
the invasion of the Mohammedans. He ordered a council in Ger-
many under St. Boniface, which forbade clergymen to take up
arms; he allowed armies to take with them chaplains; he command-
ed clergy to wear the long gown or cassock; he forbade noisy hunt-
ing by the clergy; he rooted out the remains of pagan worship of
Wodden, Thor, Friga &c., after whom the days of the week are
named; he also stopped the worship of ghosts, incantations, dreams,
charms &c., pagan customs. When Zachary received the decrees
of this German council held by St. Boniface, he was pleased with
the church in Germany, and wrote a letter to all the clergy. St.
Boniface asked this Pope many questions relating to faith, morals
and discipline, which shows that the Bishop of Rome was the
only tribunal for the settling of such matters. Zachary settled
his doubts, told him to excommunicate a Scotch priest, who taught
that baptism was a useless formality, as well as another clergyman,,
who taught that there were men under the earth, not redeemed
by Christ.
The religious zeal of Pepin son of Charles Martel was not less
than that of his father. The decrees of the councils he called at
Soissqns in 745 were approved the year following by Zachary. The
English bishops under St. Cuthbert of Canterbury gathered at
Cliff, and decreed, besides other things, that ''the rules of the
Eoman Church, which we have in writing shall be followed in all
the liturgy.'' St Egbert archbishop of York, and brother of king
Egbert, composed the first form of anointing the Saxon kings,
and the faith fostered by the Popes, was spreading in every part
of the British Isles, in the Spanish peninsula and in the North of
Europe.
But the East was still troubled by bad rulers. The patriarch
Anastasius from the very pulpit of St. Sophia, the historic cathe-
dral of Constantinople, swore by the Cross of Christ that he had
heard Copronmus the emperor deny the divinity of Christ, and
that the bad emporor said he desired to immortalize his name by
destroying the church in his dominions.
By the retirement of his brother to the monastery of Monte
Casino, Pepin son of Charles Martel, by the advice of Zachary and
by election became king of Franks, and was consecrated by St. Bon-
iface at Soissons. The Pope liberated numerous slaves, which the
Venicians were about to sell to the African infidels. He died in 752,
and the priest Stephen, whom they elected lived but a day in the
Lateran palace. Stephen III. was elected in his place by the
clergy and people of Rome in the church of St. Mary Major. He
was carried on the shoulders of the multitude to his cathedral and
palace of St. John Lateran. That was the origin of the ceremony
of carrying the Pope on his pontifical chair by twelve of the noble
guards, a splendor and pomp never seen in the coronation of any
temporal ruler.
Now rose a new danger for the Papacy. Astolphus, king of the
258 PEPIN THE DEFENDER OF THE CHURCH.
Lombards, desiring to rule all Italy, with his army, invaded the
Koman territory, signed a treaty of a 40 years of peace, broke it
and laid siege to Rome. The Pope sent word to Constantinople,
but the Greek emperor would do nothing. Then Stephen III.
sent word to Pepin for help. The French armies had recently
driven the Mohammedans from the south of France and Spain.
Pepin now placed tlie armies of France at the disposal of the Pope,
who, pressed by the Lombard king, fled to France for safety. Pepin,
victorious on every battlefield, met the Pope and prostrated him-
self with his family and all his court before him the Successor of
Peter. When the Pope rode, Pepin held the bridle of his horse
before his army. Thus in triumph all entered the royal palace at
Pontyon, Jan. 6th, 754. The next day, in sackcloth and ashes,
Stephen III. prostrates himself before king Pepin in the presence
of both the royal and the pontifical courts, thus he humbly asks
him to rescue the Holy See and the Eoman people from the tyran-
ny of the Lombards. There prostrated he remained till tlie great
Pepin gives him his hand, and the nobles swore never to sheathe
the sv/ord, till the Lombards had been punished for their unjust
invasion of the temporal dominions of the Popes.
The bishops of France took occasion of the Pontiff's residence
among them to settle many disputed points on marriage, baptism,
and the discipline relating to the clergy. He solemnly crowned
Pepin at St. Dennis July 28, 754, his queen and his two sons, one
of them being the great Charlemagne, his successor. Pepin with
his army started for Italy to restore Rome to the Popes. Astol-
phus king of the Lombards sent Carloman, Pepin's brother to treat
with him. He was then a humble monk at Monte Casino.
But Pepin replied that he had sworn to defend the Papacy. The
Lombards were put to flight, the French army conquered on every
field, and besieged the Lombard king in Pavoa. The Pope be-
seeched Pepin to spare christian blood, a treaty was drawn up, and
Stephen III. the deliverer of Italy returned to the City of the Popes.
Escorted by Jerome brother of Pepin and the Roman court, he was
met on the field of Nero by the Roman clergy and people with the
cry: " Our Father has come back to us."
But Astholphus soon forgot his agreement and laid siege to
Rome. The Pope again called on Pepin. His army crossed the
Alps, defeated the Lombards, who cede all the territory belonging
to the church, which by solemn deed was given by Pepin, to the
Holy See. The keys of 22 cities of Italy, with the deed, signed
by Pepin, were laid on the confessional of St. Peter. Snch was
the beginning of the temporal dominions of the Popes which play-
ed such an important role in the fnture histories of tlie Bisliops
of Rome.
When Stephen III. died in 757, Paul was elected heir not only
of the Papacy, but of the temporal rule for which centuries the
events in Italy had been preparing. For the people of Rome and
of the surrounding country had for generations looked on the
DO CATHOLICS WORSHIP IMAGES? 259
Soveriegn Pontiffs as their natural protectors, even since Constan-
tine moved the seat of the empire to Constantinople. Many of
the first bishops of France had come from the East, and they tol-
erated different rites up to the time of Pepin. To the latter Paul
sent tlie liturgical books of tlie Koman diocese, and the christian
king ordered that the customs of the Holy See should be intro-
duced into his vast kingdom . Paul now wrote to the emperor Con-
stantine to forsake the errors regarding images, then spreading over
the East, But the Greek emperor would not listen to the voice
of the Father of the faithful. Then rose that other error, that the
Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone, and not from both
Father and Son together. That heresy afflicts the Greek church
even to this day. In 767, Paul as well as Pepin his protector pass-
ed from earth, followed in 708 by his protector Pepin, the founder
of the carlovingians kings of France.
Stephen IV. rose to the Roman purple, while Charles the Great
ascended the civil throne of his father Pepin. A layman had been
irregularly elected, and he disputed the Chair of Peter. Stephen
IV. sent to the French king for bishops to attend the council he
had called at Rome to settle the disputes. The council declared
the election of Stephen regular, and to prevent disputes of that
kind in future, it was decreed that only clergymen would be can-
dijdates for the Papacy, that under pain of excommunication the
laity were excluded from taking part in the election of any of the
Popes. Thus disputes tend to regulate the discipline of the church.
The council also condemned the iconoclast error relating to the
use of pictures and images in the churches. Even to this day
catholics are accused of adoring images, as they were at that time.
The Lombard king, wishing to take the temporal power from the
Pope, proposed the marriage of his daughter to one of the sons of
Pepin, and of their sister to his son although they Avere already
married. The Pope at once proclaimed that legitimate marriage
could not be dissolved, and that the church never allowed such
divorces. Laying his letter on the tomb of Sts. Peter and Paul,
he said Mass and laid it in the Confession, then he sent them to
the French kings, threatening with excommunication any one who
would oppose the decrees.
Stephen died in 772, and Adrian I. came to the Chair, while
Charlemagne took the sceptre of his brother Carloman, carried off by
death in the beginning of his reign. Charlemagne was a great
christian king, the friend of religion, the protector of the Holy
See. The Lombard king now invades the States of the Church,
the Pope calls on Charlemagne, and the latter marches to Italy to
restore "the domain of St. Peter to the Sovereign Pontiffs," and
he wipes out the Lombard kingdom, which has existed for 200
years, ever threatening the independence of the Holy See. Charle-
magne now confirmed the gifts of the temporal dominions given by
his father to the Sovereign Pontiffs. One copy of the deed was
left on Peter's tomb, the other was carried to France, and placed
260 ORIGIN OF THE "FILIOQUE" DISPUTE.
in the royal arcliives. The Greek emperors, successors of the great
Coiistantiiie, far from being like him, the protectors of the Pope,
became their persecutors. But in their place rose another power-
ful emperor monarch of the West, Charlemagne. Adrian became
the mediator of a dispute between Charlemagne and the duke of
Bavaria. That was the first time the Sovereign Pontiff acted a
supreme judge between nations and rulers, a court of arbitration
they fulfilled so often in the following ages, thus acting as Vicar
of the Prince of Peace and preventing so often the horrors of war.
Europe now presented the magnificent spectacle of a religious
union under the Pope as ruler of the church, and under Charle-
magne as ruler of the state. But a heresy arose in the church of
Spain. Some words of the Mozarbic liturgy, then used in that
country, gave rise to the error that Christ is only the Son of God
by adoption, supposing that there were two Persons in Christ.
Adrian I., often consul ted by the Spanish bishops, wrote to all the
bishops of Spain explaining to them the real doctrine of the two
natures in Christ with only one Person, that of the divine Word,
proceeding from the Father, and which had been approved by
many councils held to define the catholic doctrine.
Irene, empress and regent ot the Greek empire, wishing to re-
pair the evils caused by three centuries of the persecution of the
church in the East, wrote Adrian asking him to call a universal
council to put a final end to the errors and the excesses of the
image breakers. In his reply, Adrian reproves her for calling
Tarasius the patriarch of Constantinople a Ecumenical or universal
bishop, telling her that the presidency or government of all the
churches was given to Peter by Christ and in him to the Roman
Pontiffs. The Pope then called the VII. general council, which
met in 787 at Nice under the chairmanship of Adrian's legates.
There the matters relating to pictures and to images were settled.
The council defined that they siiould not be worshipped witii divine
worship, which belongs to God alone, but that they should be
honored because of our Lord, his Mother and the saints they rep-
resent. The decrees of this council, signed by all the 377 bishops
present, by Irene, by her son Constantino VI. were then sent to
Pope Adrian, who had them translated from Greek into Latin,
and sent a copy of them to Charlemagne, with the joyful news
that the troubles of the Eastern churcii had found an end. ' But
unfortunately the translator used the word adore in the sense of
the worship due to God alone, in place of the Greek word meaning
to honor J to bow, to prostrate before. The bishops of Germany and
France supposed the Greeks at Nice had decreed to adore images
as we would adore God. Thus the world has ever been afflicted
by misunderstandings. The bishops of the West condemned the
bishops of the East, and the church was on the point of being
divided into two hostile parties when Adrian wrote to the French
explaining the meaning of the council of Nice. After 23 years
of a glorious pontificate Adrian died in 795.
ORIGIN OF THE TEMPORAL POWER, 261
A new epoch now opened in the world's history. The Empire of
the East, forgetting the dangers of the Mohammedans threaten-
ing them from the South, spent their time interfering with the
spiritual authority of the church, fritted away their time disputing
about the dogmas of religion, while the followers of the false prophet
had gathered almost at the walls of Constantinople. But a new
protector of the Holy See arose in the persons of the sons of
Charlemagne. Martel, united Europeinto the new AVest, which
became the seat of religion and of civilization driven from
the East by the curse of Mohammedanism. The See of Peter,
strengthened by the temporal power given it by Pepm and
Charlemagne, now rose above the floods of the errors of the East,
the barbarism of the West, the continual wars and carnage on all
sides, she towered aloft as the beacon of light, of truth and of
peace to the young nations rising from the ruins of paganism and
from the ruined Roman empire.
In 795 Leo HI. was crowned on the steps of the Vatican basilica.
As a temporal king, as Bishop of Rome, and as Bishop of the uni-
versal church he wore the triple crown. When Charlemagne re-
ceived the Pope's letter announcing his election, he sent to
Rome with his reply the vast treasures stolen from the churches
and hoarded by the Huns, since Attila plundered Italy. To his
father Pepin and to himself the Popes had given the title of
Roman Patrician, a figure of the Popes in later times giving the
titles of honor to eminent christian laymen of each christian nation.
Olla, king of the Mercians, increased the tax levied by Ina for the
support of an English college at Rome, built for the training of
the English clergy. His successor Kenilf asked the new Pope to
unite the bishopric of Litchfield to Canterbury, which was granted,
Alphonso of Spain asked the Pope's prayers for the success of his
army against the Moors, then overrunning his country. The East,
delivered from heresy, offered its congratulations by the empress
Irene, But a new persecution rose against Leo, led by two bad
clergymen, who drove him from the city, and he was obliged to
take up his residence in France, where he was received by
Charlemagne with the highest honors. When he came, the em-
peror, the bishops, the clergy and the whole army prostrated
themselves three times before the feet of the exiled Pontiff,
thanksgiving sevices were held, and soon Leo retui'ned again in
triumph to Rome his capital. The Pope had thought it well to
answer the foul slanders brought against him by his enemies,
but the bishops assembled in a council cried out with one voice:
"It belongs us not to judge the Apostolic See, the head of all the
churches. That See and its Pastors are our judges rather. "
Nearly all the bishops of the world, Charlemagne and his army,
with multitudes from all nations were present.
At that time Charlemagne ruled that part of Europe conquered
by the Romans, which thus embraced the West of Europe, On
that Christmas night in 800, in the great church of St. Peter's,
262 HOW CHALEMAGNE FOSTERED RELIGION.
Leo crowned Charlemagne emperor of the West. Great heroes
of the past were wise enough to learn from scholars. Thus
Alexander the great was taught by Aristotle. Constantiue the Great
was the humble pupil of Pope Sylvester, while Charlemagne
profited by the learning of an Englishman, Alcuin who lived
at the court. This priest monk directed the great ruler in his
restoration of literature, arts, and sciences, ruined by the fall of
the Eoman empire. The Bible was corrected, the valuable works
of the Greek and Roman poets and writers w-ere rescued from
destruction. The Roman alphabet took the place of the confused
letters of diverse peoples, and under this learned English priest,
the foundations of modern literature were laid. In Charlemagne's
time were established the historic schools, which later became the
great universities. Alcuin himself presided over the palace school
at court, where he taught Charlemagne himself, his sons and the
nobles of the empire. Broken down by labors and old age, Alcuin
returned to the monastery of St. Martin of Tours, given him by
Charlemagne, which he enriched by copies of the valuable manu-
scripts at York, where he the learned disciple of Yen. Bede, died
in 804. Under the impulse of the Pope, Rome sent to the em-
peror of the West the greatest scholars, the best books and all
the sciences and the learning of that time. Thus from Rome its
source, as Charlemagne said, came the civilization of Europe.
With such scholars, under the bishops, the emperor drew up his
celebrated Capitularies, the foundations of the laws of modern
Europe, which he founded on the Roman and Canon laws.
Both in the East and in the West, rulers had for some time
claimed the rightof electing the bishops and the pastors of the va-
cant churches. Charlemagne restored the election of bishops to
the clergy .ind the laity of tlie dioceses, according to the customs of
the early church. lie consulted Leo IIL regarding ordinations
and church administrations made by chorebishops, who had re-
ceived only the simple order of the priesthood. The Pope replied
that the holy orders conferred by simple priests were invalid. He
referred all important cases to the Holy See, and the decisions
of the latter became the laws of his vast empire. Tiie bishops of
Spain in the IIL council of Toledo had added the word "Fili-
oque" to the Creed of Constantinople, showing that procession of
the Holy Spirit from the Son as well as from the father, and the
phrase had been some time before introduced into the churches of
France, and the Greeks of the East found fault with it. The em-
peror called a council at Aix-la-Chapelle, where he lived, and the
council sent envoys to Leo asking a formal decision from Peter
on the question, which then began to divide the East and the West.
The Pope said that the Spirit came from both Father and Son, but
he prudently advised the churches of the West to omit singing the
Creed at Mass which was then the custom at Rome. But Leo had
the Creed engraved on silver escutcheons, each weighing 100 lbs.
one in Latin, the other in Greek, and he placed one on each side of
SEEDS OF THE GREEK SCHISM. 263
the Confessional of St. Peter. After a reign of 47 years, fortified
by the sacraments of the church from the hands of the archbishop
of Cologne Charlemagne died in 814.
The seeds of division were fast maturing which at last divided
the East from the Papacy. The emperor Nicephorus led an
adulterous life. When two priests reproved him he drove them into
exile, and- they appealed to Leo. With the most touching words
the latter made all efforts to release them. Then his son contracted
an adulterous union. When the Pope would not give his consent
to this scandalous union, the emperor joined the Manichians, this
being the first indication of the woeful heresy, which later plunged
the whole East into the Greek schism. To Leo IH. Sts. Plato and
Theodore wrote from their exile, forced on them by the wicked
emperor: " Save us supreme pastor of the church Save us we per-
ish Holy Father denounce this new heresy," &c. ' Then the bad
emperor Michael I. ascended the throne. But when Leo the Ar-
menian raised a civil revolution against him, disregarding the re-
quests of the nobles, the senate and the people of Constantinople,
he resigned the throne, and sent the imperial insignia to Pope Leo
III., as signs of the latter's spiritual supremacy. Pope Leo died -a
year after the death of Charlemagne.
Stephen V. came to the throne of Peter in 816, when Louis sat
on the throne of Charlemagne, and Leo V. was emperor of the East.
Pope Stephen went to Kheims to crown the new manarch. The
bishops and clergy of the empire with the emperor Avent forth to
meet the Pope one mile from the monastery of St. Remigius, where
the emperor Louis dismounted from his horse, helped the Pope to
dismount, and with his whole court, he prostrated himself at the feet
of the Pontitf . Then they embraced. On the following Sunday the
Pope placed on his head a costly royal diadem, which he had brought
from Rome. He likewise crowned the empress, to whom he gave the
name of Augusta. Under the advice and directions of the Pope,
many measures for the reform of discipline were enacted by the
councils held in the empire of Louis the Mild. The latter sent
the regulations of the councils to all the archbishops of the em-
pire, ordering that they be sent to the bishops and the churches,
stating that they should be put in practice within one year. The
same year at Celchyt, England, met a council, which ordered that
the ceremonies of the Roman Ritual should be carried out in ad-
ministering the sacraments, and that baptism by pouring the water
should be used in cold countries. Stephen died after a pontificate
of only 5 months. He was succeeded by St. Paschal I., a priest of
the Roman church. He officially informed Louis the Mild of
his election, and the latter sent him letters confirming to him the
States of the church, given him by his forefathers as emperors of
the West, Louis the Mild restored to the clergy and people of each
diocese the right of electing their bishops according to the decrees
«f the ancient canons of the church.
» Darras Hist. Vol. II. p. 433
264 THE MOHAMMEDANS THREATEN EUROPE.
While these things were going on in Europe, the church in the
East was persecuted by the bad emperor Leo the Armenian. He
sent his soldiers to destroy all the images, paintings and works of
art in the churches. He banished every catholic bishop and abbot
from the empire. Theodore the Studite, from his exile wrote to
all the bishops of the church, asking their aid against the emperor.
To Pascal he wrote: ""You who are clothed with Divine power, in-
trusted with the keys of the kingdom of Heaven, appointed by
God over the whole flock of Christ, the rock upon which was found-
ed the Catholic Church, for you are Peter since you fill iiis chair,
0 come to the assistance of his children, never more cruelly ex-
posed to the rage of the ravenous wolves of heresy," &c. This let-
ter, signed by the abbots of nearly all the monasteries of Constan-
tinople, was answered by the Pontiff, who sent his legates to Con-
stantinople. That action of the Pope inspired the faithful to re-
newed fervor. Leo fell under the swords of conspirators. Michael
reigned in his place and recalled the exiled bishops. Pope Leo
died in 824.
Eugenius II. began his reign in 824. The first year of his reign
was disturbed by a schism of an anti-pope called Zizimus. Michael
emperor of Constantinople tried to restore the Jewish law, denied
Jesus Christ as the Messiah, placed Judas among the saints, con-
demned Sunday worships, renewed the heresy of the imagebreakers,^
destroyed all books he could find on catholic teachings, and con-
tinually persecuted the church. Eugenius died in 827 and his
successor Valintin lived only 40 days after his consecration and the
Apostolic chair was filled by Gregory IV.
The Mohammedans, victorious in Asia Minor and in Spain, threat-
ened Europe, captured the islands of the Mediterranean, and threat-
ened Constantinople. Gregory opposed them Avith all the power
of the church. The sons of Louis the Mild rebelled against their
father, and Gregory came to their camp to make peace between
the armies. But the father's warriors fled to the camps of his sons,
and the Pope returned to Rome. The king did public penance
before a council. But unforeseen events restored him again to the
French throne. Bishop Ebbe resigned according to the desire of
Gregory IV. The latter ordered the feast of All Saints celebrated
in France. In a council at Aix-la-Chapelle, the bishops were re-
strained from intermeddling in temporal affairs, and the clnirch
property taken by Pepin, king of Aquitaine was restored. After the
death of Louis the Mild, his sons fought each other, and Gregory
tried to make peace between them. But they would not listen,
and the empire of Charlemagne disappeared in cruel wars, in
blood on the battle field of Fontenay, in spite of every effort of the
Holy See to prevent bloodshed.
In the East the empire of the Greeks, ruled by Theophilus was
rapidly falling before the inroads of the Mohammedans. He was the
last of the church persecuting emperors of Constantinople. Ha
filled the prisons of the empire with bishops, priests, christians^
THE LAST CHRISTIAN EMPEROR OF THE EAST. 265
painters, sculptors and artists, who dared to make an image of
Christ or of his saints. Christian blood deluged the land. The
<3lergyraan who preached catholic doctrine, the artist who sketched
a religious picture, or carved an image of our Lord was burned at
the stake. He forced on the episcopal throne of Constantinople
a bad man, John Lecanomantis, so called from his habit of giving
oracles from God by a metal dish. Alone the empress Theodora'
remained faithful to the church of her fathers. She was no less
celebrated for her beauty, than for her piety. When her bad hus-
band died, and she became the regent for her son Michael III., she
banished the bad bishop John from Constantinople, called a coun-
cil of bishops in the church of St. Sophia, where the errors regard-
ing the images were again condemned, the bad patriarch deposed
from his see, and MethodiuSj who had defended the faith, elected
in his place.
These things filled the heart of Gregory with gladness. But the
Northmen began their depredations along the coasts of France,
England and Ireland, while the Mohammedans overran the south of
Europe, threatened Rome and sacked St. Peter's not yet enclosed
by the walls of the city. To save the eternal city Gregory began
to fortify it, but death carried him off in 844.
When Sergius II, came to the Chair, a deacon named John
gathered a faction to oppose him and gain the triple crown. But
the people of Rome rose to the defense of their Pontiff. Avho was
crowned, before the embassadors of the emperor of the West could
come to take part in the ceremonies. The new Pope met the
emperor's son and suite at the closed doors of St. Peter's, saying
that if they came for the good of the church, the doors would be
opened for him, if not they would remain closed. The king pro-
tested that his coming was peaceable, and together Pope and king
entered and prostrated themselves at the tomb of St. Peter. The
Pope crowned the king and girded him with the royal sword.
Under the impulse of this Pontiff many councils to reform abuses
were held in France.
The good bishops St. Methodius and Ignatius successively sat
on the throne of Constantinople, and with the help of the pious em-
press Theodora, they kept the people in union with Kome. They
sent Sts. Cyril and Methodius to convert the people of the Crimea,
of the Slaves, and the Moravians. The great writers Hinc-
mar and Rabanus were bishops in the West, and by their learning
they revived learning in these parts of the church. Again the
Mohammedans sacked Rome and all the surrounding country in
spite of the able defence made by Sergius.
Sergius II. was scarcely in his grave in 847, when the unan-
imous voice of the clergy and people of Rome raised a priest to
the tiara who took the name of Leo IV. The Mohammedans then
threatened Rome, but a tempest dispersed them and the waves
washed back to shore some of the spoils of St. Peter's which were
again returned to the church. Leo IV. resolved to enclose the
266
THE LEONINE CITY.
Vatican with a wall and unite it to the eternal city; hence that
part with the Vatican is called the Leonine City. The Moham-
medans landed at Ostia, attacked Rome but they were repulsed by
Leo IV. , and never again did the crescent of the Turk appear be-
fore the eternal city.
Thus far we have given but a rapid sketch of the chief acts of
the Bishops of Rome for the first nine centuries of their glorious
reigns, showing what they did for the peace and prosperity of
the human race. No line of kings or human rulers can be in any
way compared to them, they have been the fountain head and the
source of all progress upon this earth. Through them God speaks
to the world.
But we must now speak of the Roman clergy, these noble men
of the diocese of Rome, who ever guard the traditions of Peter their
first bishop. For that reason we tell in the next chapter of the
College of Cardinals the chief clergy of the Roman diocese.
BRINGING FOOD TO THE CARDINAI-S IN CONCLAVE.
tHE Holy Persons looking down upon the earth saw no living
plant or animal with reason and free will like unto them-
selves. Then they said: '^' Let us make man to our own
image and likeness." * Then "male and female he created
them. ''* First he created Adam, that means in the Babylonian
language first spoken by man "red earth," to show him that he
came from the earth by the mighty hand of God. Then from
his rib, the nearest bone to his heart, he created Eve. That was
» Gen. 1. 2 Ibidem, i.
267
TllK CAIJDINAL lUHiil' i <] o- | | .\ ( KoWMNd IIIK VnVK.
THE TRIPLE CKOWN SIGNIFIES HIS POWER AS UNIVERSAL BISHOP.
BISHOP OF ROME AND TEMPORAL RULER.
THE SPIRITUAL SPOUSE OF PETER. 269
the first marriage, to show that man and wife are one bone and
flesh, that she is the nearest to the husband's heart, and that
she was to be the same in human nature with him, partaking in
his authority and government over their children. All was a fig-
ure and a preparation for that other and more Avonderful wedlock
of Christ with his church, born from his side the day of his cruci-
fixion, a mysterious union still continued in the diocese of Eome,
and in every diocese throughout the world. Let us first consider
the diocese of Rome before we descend to the other dioceses.
Bearing all the power Christ gave him, Peter came to Rome and
chose that church as his spiritual spouse, of which he became the
first titular bishop. By that holy union the Roman church re-
ceived from him a part of his power, and a partnership in his
government over all the other churches scattered throughout the
whole world. To Peter our Blessed Lord gave the power of feed-
ing his sheep and lambs, an authority which opens and closes the
gates of heaven to mankind, the authority of a father over the
children of God. But the wife has the very same power as her
husband in the household, for she too generates the children of
her husband. From the moment Peter chose Rome as his church,
the Roman church became his spouse, with authority over all his
lambs and sheep, the other churches and dioceses of the universal
church, of which Peter was the first shepherd.
The Bishop of Rome is the heir of Peter, the inheritoi* of all the
spiritual power and authority the latter received from Christ. At
his election God in heaven gives him direct all the authority,
which at first he gave to Peter. But the wife is the helpmate of
her husband in the generation of others like themselves. So the
Roman church aids the Pope in the government of all the other
dioceses, their spiritual children, whom they bring forth images of
themselves.
The honors, the perfections, the wealth of husband and wife
belong to both. The church universal is great because of her
head Jesus Christ. The holiness and the learning of St. Augus-
tine still sheds a halo over the little diocese of Hippo, which 'he
ruled for so many years, the greatness of Sts. Ambrose and of
Charles Borromeo still linger around Milan, the fortitude of St.
Thomas A Becket adds glory to the diocese of Canterbury, and
the transcendent works of the Gregories, of the Benedicts, of the
Leos still illumine the world from the Chair of Peter on which
they sat. Following these simple rules the power of the Bishop
of Rome flows down on the Roman clergy. Therefore because of
greatness their Bishop, the clergy of Rome are over all the other
clergy and churches of the world.
When Peter oame to Rome, he brought with him the whole ma-
chinery of the church, knowing that first God chose the Jews as
the repository of his revelation to man. But when Peter had un-
derstood that God had rejected the Jewish nation because of their
sins, filled with the Holy Spirit, Peter chose Rome the mistress
270 THE ANCIENT PRESBYTERY OF ROME.
of the Gentile world the city of destiny which had conquered the
world long before the daj's of Christ. To the clergy and people
of Rome Peter preached for 35 years, and Roman clergy became
the depository of his teachings, which they have kept unspotted
even to our day. No error or heresy ever rose among the Romans,
for the heresies which disturbed the world came from strangers.
While Rome was the city of power at the time of the apostles,
Athens was the city of learning and of culture. Rome was the
Latin and Athens the Greek centre of learning and of literature.
When in the VI. century the barbarians swept down from north-
eastern Euroj^e and from Asia, they wiped out the language and
literature of Rome, and Latin became a dead language, from
which sprung the modern tongues of southern Europe. But they
never penetrated as far as Greece, whence Greek is still spoken
and written as in the days of Aristotle.
The Eternal Father in heaven does nothing without the councils
of his Son, and this rule of acting was from the beginning con-
ferred on the Roman church. Before acting the Popes first con-
sulted tlieir councilors the clergy of Rome. We find then that
the clergy of Rome from the very beginning had three functions,
to advise their Bishop, to aid him in the government of the uni-
versal church, when he died they administered the whole church
during the vacancy, and they elected his successor. Such are the
tliree chief duties of the venerable College of Cardinals the most
august and venerable legislative and consultive body of men which
ever existed.
The word cardinal comes from the Latin "cardo,"a hinge or
pivot around which anything turns or circles. It means the
chief, the highest, the principal, the one to whom others adhere.
The word was first used by Pope Anacletus in the year 84, when
he said that the Roman church was the cardinal or chief church
of the world.' It is found in the monuments of the council held
at Rome in 324 under Sylvester, although some think that these
documents are not authentic. Numerous historic facts show us
that the chief clergy of Rome were always afterwards called car-
dinals.
Each Bishop of the early church had under liim his aid.s and
helpers in the work of the ministry of the Gospel. They were
called the presbytery or senate of the diocese in the early ages,
and the chapters or canons of the cathedral in more modern times.
Wliile living they helped the bishop, when he died they adminis-
tered the diocese and then with the clergy and people of the
diocese they elected his successor. But as the Roman church
ruled the whole christian world, the presbytery of the Roman church
took part with their Bisliop in his supreme authority. This Pope
Eugenius decreed, ' and all monuments of that early age show.
Writers say that the senate of cardinals and the presbytery of
the diocese were established by God himself. For when the people
> Gratianus C&n. Sacrosancta Dlst. 22. * Bull. Rom. T. III. p. 3.
MEANING OF THE WORD CARDINAL. 271
of Israel murmured for the flesh-pots of Egypt, God commanded
Moses to gather a council of seventy ancients, to help him in the
government of the people of God. * Christ not only consecrated
the apostles bishops of the universal church, but he also ordained
priests and ministers to aid them, and they ordained deacons to
look after the temporal business of the churches. ^ Innocent III.
says: ''The priests are of the levitical order of our brothers, who
exist and are our aids in the fulfilment of our priestly duties."*
EugeniusIV. confirms the same, and John VIII. ''says that as Moses
had seventy elders to aid him, so the Pontiff has the same number
of helpers. The emperor Frederick II. writing to the cardinals in
1239 says: '' As Christ is the head of the church, and by the name
Peter he founded the church on that Rock, thus he ordained that
you are the successors of the apostles." * One of the Galican coun-
cils proclaimed that the Papal dignity was established in Peter,
the cardinals and in the other apostles. * The university of Prague
declared in 1413 the same doctrine. '' But some authors deny that
the apostles were the first cardinals, saying that they could be sup-
pressed by the Pope, which he could not do if they had been founded
by God, as what God did only he can undo. But these are idle
questions, for the college of cardinals always was and always will be
in the church of God, and it seems probable according to some
writers, that they are of divine institution.
Gregory the Great calls some of the bishops of his time cardinals,
and the chief priests and ministers of many dioceses were at that
time called cardinals, that is the advisers of their bishops. He
wrote to the bishop of Syracuse to call Cosmaa pastor in the coun-
try to the cathedral, and make him a cardinal of that church that is
a canon, because he was so homesick in the country that he was
going to run away. He wrote to another bishop of the same city to
incardinate Felix a deacon into the cathedral clergy. Many monu-
ments of the early church show us that the clergy of other dioceses
even in the lower orders were sometimes called cardinals. The
word incardinate meant the same as incorporate into a strange
diocese, for the clergy of the cathedrals were especially called cardi-
nals, because above all they aided the bishops in administering the
diocese. From the eighth century, these clergymen of other dioceses
formed the presbytery of the cathedral and the senate of the
diocese.
After the eight century only the clergy of Eome were called car-
dinals. In 769 under Stephen IV. a Roman synod decreed that
no one except a cardinal should be elected to the honor of the Roman
Pontificate. After this time only clergymen belonging to the Ro-
man See were called cardinals, and the cathedral of the Popes, the
churcji of St. John Laceran was called the "hing" or "cardo" of
the city of Rome, because of the Pontiff who sat in it as the heir of
Peter. Following the Roman custom, the chief clergymen of the
' Num xi. Deut. xvii. ^ Acts vi. ^ Cap. per venerab. 13. Tit. 17. L. 4. Decret.
* Bouix De Curea Romana Fia, » St. Thomas. Sum. p. I. L. 2, C. 114.
« Concll Constant. T. vi. p. 18. ' T. I. p. 188.
272 THE "VARIOUS RANKS OF CARDINALS.
other cathedrals of the world were also called cardos or hinges,
around which the laity and clergy of the diocese swung or united.
But the special clergymen or cardinals of all the dioceses of the
early church formed the cathedral chapters, the venerable presby-
teries of the ancient churches of the apostles. At the present time
only the chief clergy of the Koman church are called cardinals.
The cardinals are divided into cardinal bishops, cardinal priests
and cardinal deacons,— because of the eminence of the Eoman
church over the otlier churches of the world, all orders and perfec-
tions of the whole body of the church are found in her head, the
diocese of Rome. But these three grades were not in the early
church, for before the year 769 there were no cardinal bishops in
Rome, while there were always cardinals, priests, aud deacons from
the time of the apostle Peter.
Pope St. Cletus, elected in the year 75, and who lived with Pe-
ter, divided the city of Rome into twenty-five parish-sections, and
appointed a body of clergymen to each church, saying St. Peter had
ordered him to do so during his life.' Such was the beginning and
origin of all the parishes in the world. Evaristus elected in 108
confirmed the erection of these parishes.* These parishes and
churches of Rome were cardinalates. As it was customary in the
old law to give a name to the altar where they offered the sacrifice
to God, so in the early church they gave names to the houses or
places where they offered the holy sacrifice of the Mass, and that
was the origin of the titles of these early tituhir churches in Rome
from which to-day the cardinals take their titles.
^ In the time of Pope Dennis in 259, there were twenty-five such
titular churches in the eternal city. Later they became more
numerous as the wants of the people required. ' In the days of
John XXII. five patriarchs, seven titular bishops of sees near Rome,
and then thirty-one cardinal priests and fourteen deacons assisted
the Pope in ruling the whole church They then formed the vener-
able senate of the universal church. The number of cardinals
varied in the different orders or ranks. The council of Constance
ordered that there should be only twenty-four cardinal priests.
Paul IV. decreed that there should not be more than forty cardinal
priests, while Gregory XIH. increased the number to seventy-six,
Sixtus V. restricted them to seventy and assigned fifty of the titu-
lar churches of Rome to them.
The ajwstles ordained seven deacons ' and from the days of Peter,
there were seven deacons in the church at Rome. According to
Pope Fabianus, who sat in 136, they were to look after the widows,
the orphans, the sick, and take care of the fourteen parishes into
which tlie city had been divided long before his time. In tlie days
of Pope Symmachus each deacon had a certain territory to look
after. When the needs of the church increased the number of car-
dinal deacons was doubled. They took their titles from the par-
ishes or regions which they governed. Gregory III. added four
• Lib. Pont. * TamffDa Orifrin de Card. P. 4. cap. 4. art. I. n. 64. > Acts vl.
BISHOPS, PRIESTS AND DEACONS MAY BE CARDINALS. 273
more deacons, whom he attached to the cathedral of St. John Lat-
eran, that they might assist the Pope on important ceremonies.
They were called cardinals of the palace, that is the Latei'an palace
of tiie Roman emperors given by Constantino to Pope Sylvester in
312, where the Popes lived for a 1000 years, before they moved
to the Vatican. In 141 0 there were nineteen cardinal deacons, but
Sixtus V. restricted the number to fourteen.
In 1057 Victor II. ordained Fredrick as a cardinal subdeacon.
After that we find many cardinal subdeacons. But for many cen-
turies there have been no cardinal subdeacons in the Roman church,
because it is not certain that subdeaconship is a holy order
instituted by Christ, for it began to be considered as a holy order
only from the middle ages.
Before the middle of the eighth century we find no records of
cardinal bishops among the Roman clergy. They are first mention-
ed by a synod of Rome, held in the year 769 under Stephen III.,
which forbids bishops, presbyters and deacons to become cardinals
of Rome, without the consent of the Pope. From this it seems
that before this date clergymen in episcopal orders had become car-
dinals. Stephen IV. states that the seven cardinal bishops must
celebrate Mass each Sunday at St. Peter's altar in the Lateran
church and recite the " Gloria. " From documents dating from
1410 we find that seven cardinal bishops having no titles but ruling
the seven neighboring dioceses near Rome in the Lateran church
waited on the Bishop of Rome'. The cities from which they took
their titles were Ostia, now united with Velletri, Porto, Albano,
Palestrina, Sabina, and Frascati. The bishop of Ostia is the dean
of the sacred college, wears the pallium of an archbishop, and
crowns the Pope.
At the present time there are only six cardinal bishops, fifty
cardinal priests and fourteen cardinal deacons, making seventy
in all. Such this august senate has been since the time of Sixtus V.
Paul II. commanded that they must not wear purple or any other
than red church garments. Those cardinals who belong to the
religious orders can wear the habit of their order, except the red
biretta and skull cap. An archbishop or patriarch niay be only a
cardinal priest in the Roman church. Thus Cardinal Newman was
only a cardinal deacon although in priest's orders. Archbishop
Manning is a cardinal priest in the Roman church, although he is
the archbishop of Westminster.
The very essence of the cai'dinalate requires that it be a college
or senate forming a special body of clergymen to aid the Pope in his
universal government. In this they differ from all other bodies of
clergymen, who aid the bishops in governing their dioceses. The
chief office of this holy senate of the universal church is to aid the
Pontiff while living, when he dies to administer the church till
the new Pope takes his place, and elect the Pope. The election of
the Bishop of Rome is not such an essential office as the two former,
for in the early church both the clergy and laity of Rome took
274 THE SENATE OF THE CHURCH.
part in the election, till so many political abuses rose, that the
election was confined alone to the college of cardinals. Whence
although the chief priests of a diocese always aid the bishop and ad-
minister the diocese at his death, still the canons of the cathe-
dral chapter do not always elect their bishop, for the election of »
bishop is not essential to their office.
The senate of cardinals then is a body of clergymen elected to
help the Pope in his government of the church and to administer
it during a vacancy of the See. From this it will appear, that
they exceed in dignity all other men in the church, being over all
patriarchs, primates, bishops or prelates. The Pope alone is their
superior. This has always been the custom of the church from
the very beginning, as Pope Eugenius says when writing to the
archbishop of Canterbury in 1438.' In all meetings of the bishops
of the church, the cardinals, even those only in priest's and deacon's
orders take their place after the Pope, and ahead of all the patri-
archs, primates, archbishops, &c., because as Innocent III. says a
cardinal is not only for the Roman, but for all the churches of the
world." Their preeminence over all other churchmen was confirmed
by many councils, especially these held at Lyons and at Florence
and at Trent.
The college of cardinals then forms the senate of the universal
church. We must remember that to Peter, and not to the college
of cardinals or to any other person did Christ say: "Feed my lambs
Feed my sheep." " Therefore the Pope as successor of Peter rules
the church. Even without consulting the cardinals, he can do
what he thinks right. It is a matter of faith that he alone is the
supreme visible ruler of the church. Many acts of the president
of this country would be invalid without the consent of the senate.
But the president does not get his authority from one man as the
Pope does from Christ, but from God by and through the election
of the people, while the Pope is the Vicar of Christ, and gets his
authority direct from Christ, and his acts are valid without the
consent of the senate of cardinals. Nor can we say that the bish-
op is obliged to get the consent of the chapter of the diocese be-
fore he can do certain things in the diocese, * because the bish-
op is bound by the laws of the church, while the Pope, being over
all the church laws, having only the laws of God over him, he is
free. But although such acts would be valid, yet it would be
unusual for the Pope to take such measures, which no Pope ever
did, for they always first took council with their senate before
taking any important measures in the church. That has ever
been the custom of the church. The Pope follows the constitu-
tions of his predecessors, unless the changed circumstances of the
times require that he act differently. He asks the opinions of the
cardinals in all matters relating to the government of the church.
But as God is above all and does as he sees fit, acting as lie wishes,
80 the Pope having no superior but God, he is above the church,
> Const. Non medlocrl. » 8 de Postul. Proel. * John xxl. * Condi. BalUm.
HOW CARDINALS ARE ELECTED. 276
and he may act according to the lights given him by the Holy
Ghost, although in practice, he always seeks the advice of his sen-
ate, the sacred college of the cardinals.
The cardinals are elected by the Pope. For it is not a sacred
order, like the priesthood or the episcopacy instituted by Christ.
Eugene IV. decreed that no one elected a cardinal can fulfil that
office, till he has been received by the Pope according to the
usual ceremony of reception. When first nominated the Pope closes
the mouth of the cardinal elect, a ceremony by which he is given to
understand, how useful it is to be prudent in revealing the secrets of
the church, or the line of action of the papal court before the time
comes. But as Pius V. says, the election of the Bishop of Rome is the
chief duty of the cardinal, even before the ceremony allowing him to
open his mouth and vote, before the ceremony of opening his
mouth a cardinal can vote for the election of a Pope when the
Eoman See becomes vacant. At his election the new Pope takes,
an oath, that he will not elect any cardinal without first consulting
the cardinals.
Most of the cardinals are aged men, a number die each year, and
their vacancies must be filled. When the Pope wisiies to create
others in their place, he calls a meeting of the sacred college, re-
veals to them the new men he selects, and says: "What do you
think about it?" If they are willing, each cardinal uncovers his
head by taking off his biretta and makes a bow. If all agree a
decree is drawn up relating to the matter. If the newly nominated
candidates are in Rome, they at once wait on the Pope, and one of
the cardinals presents them to his holiness, who places on their
heads the red biretta of the cardinal until the public consistory,
when all the insignia of their holy office will be given them. They
are not allowed to visit or receive visits. If the new candidate
does not live in Rome, the Pope sends one of his household to
bring him the red biretta. According to the constitution of
Pope Sixtus V. the new cardinal must swear that he will go to
Rome within a year then to receive the full insigna of his high
office.
When the proper time comes for the reception of the new car-
dinals, the sacred college assembles in a public consistory, presided
over by the Pope vested in full pontificals, sitting on the throne
of the fisherman. The candidates come before the Pope, who in-
structs them in the duties of their office. Then they kneel before
him and kiss his feet and hands, while he receives them with a
kiss on the lips. From the other cardinals they then receive the
kiss of peace. The Pope then invests them in their red vestment
with the words; '-'Unto the praise of the omnipotent God, and
the adorning of the Holy See, receive thou the red vestment, the
sign of the wonderful dignity of the cardinalate, which means even
unto the shedding of blood and unto death, thou must bravely
work for the spread of holy faith, for the peace and prosperity of
the christian people, and for the increase and the augmentation
276 WHO SHOULD BE MADE CAKDIITALS.
of the most holy Roman church, in the name of the Father and
of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Amen."
At a later meeting of the consistory, the Pope asks the other
cardinals if the ceremony of opening their mouths should now
take place. All having agreed, the Pontiff says: "We open your
mouth for you, that you may give advice both in councilsand
in the election of the supreme Pontiff, and in every official act,
Tphich relates to the cardinalate, both in consistories, as well as
outside, which belong to the cardinals, in the name of the Fath-
. er and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.''
From the very days of the apostles the clergy of the Roman
church have been noted for great learning, experience, diplomacy
and faith. Only the most eminent men, says Paul II. should be
elected to the office of cardinal. The council of Trent decreed that
the most learned men in the church should be selected to aid the
Pontiff in his universal government. One having an uncle or neph-
ew in the sacred college, the illegitimate one having the defects pre-
venting him beinga bishop, or other obstacles cannot be a cardinal.
The council of Trent says: "When the most holy Roman Pontiff
finds them worthy he will elect the cardinals from all the christian
nations."' Sixtus V. decreed that the cardinals should be most
learned in church matters, and that at least four should belong to the
religious and mendicant orders. ' From the time of the Pope's
exile at Avignon, the cardinals have been selected from various
christian nations, but the larger number are from Italy, because
as God chose the Jewish nation to be the mother of Christianity,
so Peter chose the Roman church as his spouse, and the Romans
above all have preserved his teachings.
The Cardinals who are besides bishops of other dioceses must
live in their dioceses. They are asked for their advice when the
Pope is about to legislate regarding the nation to which they be-
long. Thus when the question of dealing with the Knights of La-
bor in this country came up, Leo XIII. counciled with cardinal
archbishop Gibbons of Baltimore, who advised that the question
be dropped. The six cardinal bishops of the neighboring dioceses
live in Rome, for they are so near their dioceses that they can ad-
minister their sees from the eternal city. All the other cardinals,
without the express permission of the Pope, must live at Rome, so
as to help the latter in Ins universal government.
The six cardinals bishops of the cities near Rome mentioned
above, have the titles of the dioceses of which they are the titular
bishops. The cardinal priests have the titles of the fifty chief
churches of Rome, while the cardinal deacons have no regular
titles, being attached to the deaconates of Rome.
In former times the cardinals had quasi-episcopal jurisdiction
over the regions into which the eternal city was divided, and they
ruled their flocks as pastors. We may then consider the cardinal
priests as pastors of the Roman diocese.
* See. xxtv. C. i. * Const. Postquam. Art. 1. n. 2S.
WHO CAN VOTE FOK A POPE ? 277
As the Pope is tlie emperor of religion, tlie cardinals rank as
kings ruling under an emperor. Hence, Pius II. when creating
cardinals used to say: ^' You are like kings.'' According to the
Roman ceremonial, when catholic kings take part in the Roman
ceremonials the Pope ranks first, then the first cardinal bishop,
then the kings. When there is a dispute about an election of
the Pope, the cardinals call a council of the whole church to set-
tle the dispute.
The cardinal bishop of Ostia is the dean of the holy senate,
ranking next the Pope himself. If the Pope elect be not a
bishop, he must be consecrated by the cardinal bishop of Ostia.
At the coronation of a Roman emperor, before the ceremony he
sits after the bishop of Ostia. But after he is crowned, the em-
peror sits between the Pope and the cardinal dean of Ostia^ while
a king ranks above the cardinals and next to the dean of the sa-
cred college the bishop of Ostia, but never before him, which be-
longs only to an emperor of the Romans. The cardinal bishop of
Ostia wearing the pallium of an archbishop, fills the office of pre-
fect of tlie Congregation of Rites, and secretary of the congrega-
tion of the Holy Office. The secretary, or clerk of the senate of
cardinals, is an Italian. He takes care of the books, documents,
and papers of the senate. He had before the reformation four
clerks, which according to the constitution of Urban VIII.' he se-
lected from the German, the Spanish, French and English na-
tions. In their turn they helped him as clerk of the senate.
When the whole college of cardinals meets, the Pope is their
chairman.
Nowhere in the Bible do we find that God ordained the way of
electing the successors of St. Peter. Then the matter of electing
a Pope Christ left to the church. But as to Peter he gave full
power of ruling the church, then to the Pope his heir it belongs to
appoint the manner of the election of his successors. From the
very beginning the Roman clergy and people selected their Pon-
tiff, and to their Bishop alone belongs the power of defining the
mode of election. During the first four centuries the clergy alone,
that is the priests and deacons of Rome elected their Bishop. From
the time of Pope Sylvester the laity of Rome took part Avith the
clergy in the election, but they only confirmed the election. Many
rules were made regarding the way of voting. For the last four
centuries only the cardinals can vote. * During the middle ages
kings and emperors took an active part. But their action like
that of the laity of Rome Avas a usurpation, and became later an in-
tolerable abuse, Avhich the church found great trouble in rooting
out. The election of the Bishop of Rome belongs by right to the
Roman clergy, for only the wife can select her husband. The
cardinals are the heads and the chief pastors of Rome and they rep-
resent the whole Roman clergy. The clergy of Rome received
the power of election from the apostles as all writers say, and the
1 Admonet nos. ^ Card. Petra. T. Iv. ad Const. Clem. vi. n. 18.
278 THE CARDINALS WHEN THE POPE DIES.
laity had only a confirming but never a deciding voice in the se-
lection. In later ages the clergy of Rome were called cardinals,
so that the election of a Pope by the college of cardinals is of
apostolic origin.
In the times of the persecution of the Roman empire, before
Constantine gave liberty to the church by his famous edict of the
freedom of worship, the christian Romans with their Bishop,
lived mostly in the underground catacombs, although it is true
that for some time before this, Sylvester had privately lived in the
Lateran palace, the home of the Csesars, and that Helena, Con-
stantine's mother, had fitted up a little chapel for him in the
palace. Yet the first Popes were elected in the catacombs.
The Pope is the administrator of the churcii universal, and the
cardinals are his senators. As the Pope is not elected for a term
of years but for life, his office becomes vacant only by deatii or
resignation. Then the administration of the whole church be-
longs to the supreme senate, the college of cardinals. But they
have not the power of the Pope, neither while he lives nor when
he dies. They can undertake no important measures during a
vacancy of the Roman See, unless urgent causes force them to act.
This was decreed by Gregory X. in the council of Lyons in 127'^.
They cannot create new cardinals, receive those cardinals nom-
inated but not received by the dead Pope, appoint bishops, nor
confirm those elected but not confirmed by tlie Pope before his
death, neither can they exercise any act of jurisdiction belonging
to the Pope. Thus as a senate of the universal church, in the early
ages they exercised much more authority during a vacancy of the
Roman See than at present, somewhat as the chapters of the
cathedrals administered the vacant sees at the death of the bish-
ops. But the Roman congregations have ordinary jurisdiction,
and they can exercise that authority during a vacancy, because
cases of great and urgent importance come up before them every
day, and they could not be interrupted during a vacancy of the Holy
See without detriment to souls. That authority was given them
by Sixtus V. '
In case of great danger to the church, in matters of universal
importance, the senate of cardinals has universal jurisdiction over
the whole church during a vacancy, and they can administer and
pass judgment on these urgent cases. When a dispute arises
about the legality or validity of the election of a Pope, as wheti
two are contending, each claiming to be the legitimate successor
of Peter, and a council of the whole church cannot meet, the sen-
ate of the cardinals can pass judgment, impeach the usurper and
drive him out. *
When the Pope dies the chief chamberlain, aided by the bishop
of Ostia the dean or chief of the cardinal bisiiops, the dean of the
cardinal priests and the dean of the cardinal deacons, form a board
for the administration of the universal church during the vacancy.
> Const. " Immensa." ' 81 quls 9. dist. 79.
TOMB OF THE POPE OVER THE DOOB LEADING INTO THE VESTRY OF ST. PETER'S.
PREPARING TO VOTE FOR A POPE. 281
Before 24 hours have elapsed since tlie death of the Pope was offi-
cially announced, the chief chamberlain summons every cardinal
in the world without an exception, to take part in the election of
the new Pontiff. Even if one cardinal were not allowed to cast
his vote, the election would be invalid. The chamberlain then
sees that the body of the deceased Pope is inclosed in three coffins
and buried with great pomp. The body of the Pontiff was for-
merly placed over the door of the choir leading into the vestry-
room of the papal court, as shown in the engraving, where it
remained for a year, a continual remembrance to the new Pope,
and to the whole papal court of the end of all men, death.
The wife always selects her husband and if she does not give
her consent the marriage is invalid — no one can force her to mar-
ry a man she does not want. So the Koman clergy elected their
Bishop from the days of the apostles. Representing the Roman
church the spiritual spouse of the .Pope, they elect the ghostly
husband of the Roman church. We have not space to give the
complete history of the elections of the Popes from the times of
the apostles. From time to time the laity and governments in-
terfered, so regulations had to be made preventing abuses and po-
litical intrigues. But the chief clergy of Rome, which in our day
are called cardinals nearly always voted, and their votes alone de-
cided the elections.
At the first meeting of the college of cardinals, they read the
Bulls of Alexander III., Gregory X., Clement V., Clement VI.,
Julius II., Pius IV., Gregory XV., Urban VIII . and of Clement
XII., regulating the way of casting the ballots &c. The election
must begin on the tenth day after the Pope's death. No power
on earth can deprive a cardinal of his vote if he be present. Bat
the senate will not wait longer than ten days ai'ter the death of
the Pope for the cardinals living at a distance. When the absent
cardinals come, they have a right to enter the senate now formed
into a solemn conclave for the election of Peter's successor.
The cardinals first take a solemn oath on the holy Gospels, to
caretnlly observe the rules of the conclave. The Fisherman's
ring, worn by the deceased Pontiff, is first broken by the master of
ceremonies, by order of the cardinal chamberlain. The funeral
oration over the dead is preached, and the session of the fii'st day
comes to a close. The next day only political matters are dis-
cussed; they confirm the officers of the Pontifical states, who come
forward and offer their obedience to the sacred senate; then the
following three days are devoted to electing the officers of the
conclave. On the sixth day they allot the ceils wherein each
cardinal will live during the meeting; on the seventh day they
choose other attendants in addition to the two already selected by
the chamberlain; they enter the names of all the officers of the
senate on the books; on the last day they choose three cardinals to
preside over the meeting.
In the meantime the usual business of this great senate has
282 TBE CAK DINARS WALLED IN.
been carried on; audiences have been granted; the embassadors
of foreign governments the ministers of nations come before them
and bend the knee, as the}' stand before the senate with uncovered
heads, as before the Pope himself, for the cardinals now have su-
preme power in the church. The dean of the sacred senate as
chairman replies to all matters proposed by any governments in
the name of all. The sermon before the election delivered in
Latin relates to the importance of the duty they are about to per-
form, at the close of which they march in solemn procession to
the place where the conclave is to sit, the papal choir singing at
the same time the beautiful words of the hymn: •' Come Creator
Spirit." The conclave for the election of the Pope usually meets
at the Vatican, but for sufficient reasons they can assemble at the
palace of the Quirinal. When they come to "the chapel, the Bulls
and constitutions of the Popes regulating papal elections are again
read, again they take the solemn oath to do their duty conscien-
tiously, and the cardinal dean addresses them on the importance
and the solemnity of the occasion. Up to this time the cardinals
can receive visitors, &c. But at the stroke of midnight, the mas-
ter of ceremonies rings a bell, and all not belonging to the con-
clave retire. Then the marshal in the presence of the three
cardinals solemnly closes the doors, and from that time no one is
allowed to go in or out, except the absent cardinals, who may be
late in coming from distant countries.
The word conclave comes from the Latin, and means a key, be-
cause the building is entirely closed, and the cardinals as it were
are locked in from all earthly influences, so as to be free in elect-
ing the most worthy, for such a high office in the church. No
other assembly of cardinals is called conclaves, but congregations,
as they are not inclosed when occupied with other business of the
church.
By orders of Nicholas IL and Clement IV. the cardinals must
meet at Rome for the election of the Pope. But for good reasons
the election can be held at any other place. But the Vatican
palace is the favorite place, because of its nearness to St. Peter's,
although Pius IX. was chosen at the Quirinal.
Each cardinal hasa cell twenty feet square and the same in height
built of light frames and covered Avith violet tapestry, if elected by
the deceased Pope, otherwise they are covered with green or red.
It is divided into two rooms one for himself the other for his at-
tendants, or conclavists.
When all have entered, the entrances to the conclave, the doors,
windows &c. are walled in, only one entrance being allowed, and
this is guarded with the greatest care. This sole entrance has two
locks, one on the inside the other on the outside. The governor
of the conclave has the key of one, the master of ceremonies the
other key. The gate has four openings through which the cardi-
nals receive their meals, aiul whatever else is absolutely required.
But great care is shown that no communication with the outside
HOW THE CONCLAVE IS ARRANGED. 283
world can take place, or that the cardinals could be influenced in
their votes. Even the halls next to the conclave are locked with
two locks, the keys of which are in the hands of the cardinal cam-
erlango, the marshal of the conclave a prince of the house of Chigi
has the otlier key. Under him are drawn up the papal troops,
surrounding the conclave and guarding the city.
These precautions are taken to prevent political intrigues or out-
side influences, and to stop any pressure brought by European
governments on the election, so that the cardinals may be free to
select the man whom they in conscience judge the best to rule the
Kiugdom of Christ. Even the food is carefully examined to see that
it contains no letters.
When they are enclosed, all cardinals, attendants &c. without ex-
ception take the oath of fidelity and of secrecy and to observe the
rules of procedure. They then carefully examine the whole en-
closure to see that no unauthorized person is there, and that the
walls and passages are closed. This they do twice a day after-
. wards.
The next day the election begins without waiting for absent
cardinals, who when they come after the conclave has been closed,
have the right to enter in a solemn procession. Nothing can pre-
vent a cardinal from taking part in the election. The cardinals
are entirely free to choose any one, even a layman. From the time
of Urban VI. it has been customary to elect one of the cardinals,
and in modern times, because of the temporal power of the Pope,
he has usually been an Italian. The celebrated canonist Phillips
says that even a married layman can be elected, who would have to
separate from his wife. Any member of the catholic church
is a candidate, only pagans and heretics are excluded. An elec-
tion brought about by money or by influences of that kind is in-
valid, null and void.
The voting takes twice a day morning and evening in the chapel,
where each cardinal takes his allotted seat, the first cardinal
bishop of Osti sitting in the highest seat at the left of the entrance,
while tlie first cardinal priest is opposite on the right. The seats
and floor are draped in green, before each seat is a desk for writing
and praying, decorated with the cardinal's coat of arms.
Before the election begins, the sacristian of the conclave, an
Angustian monk says the Mass of the Holy Ghost for the light
and the guidance of the Holy Spirit. The Mass over, all the at-
tendants leave the chapel, except the cardinals, who prepare to
cast their votes.
The Pope may be elected in three ways — by quasi-inspiration,
by compromise, or by ballot. The first takes place when without
any delay, all at once would agree to the election of a certain man,
all being convinced that he is the most worthy. If they could
not agree, but would select two cardinals to vote in the name of
all the others, but on condition that they would not vote for them-
selves, it would be a compromise. The election would be by bal-
284 THE KIND OF BALLOTS USED.
lot, were all to cast their votes after deliberation, two-thirds being
necessary for a choice, no one voting for himself. This is the
usual way the Popes are elected. When no candidate has receiv-
ed the necessary two-thirds votes, the ballots are burned, the smoke
telling the Romans that no choice has yet been made. Then the
cardinals retire again to their cells to wait for the following day.
This is done each day till the election takes place.
Before they vote, by lot they appoint three inspectors of the
election, three cardinals to take the vores of the sick members
who may be confined to their cells, and three to revise the election
and officially certify to its regularity. The ballots are printed
on 6x5 pieces of paper, divided into eight sections. The first is
for the name of the voter, the second is a blank, the third for the
cardinal's seal, the fourth has the name of the candidate he votes
for, the fifth a blank, the sixth for the second seals, the seventh for
any motto or verse of the Bible, and the eighth a blank. The oth-
er side of the ballot is so tilled up with ornamental work, that the
name of the candidate written cannot be seen nor what is on the
other side of the paper. Each cardinal writes the name of his
candidate on these ballots at the centre table, and in the presence
of all casts his vote. The ballots are so folded that no one can
tell for whom they vote, and they must not use their customary
seals, but have other seals made for this occasion. These meas-
ures are taken to insure secrecy. At the beginning, they place
a large chalice and paten on the altar, near where the cardinal
inspectors take their seats. Then the voting begins. The bish-
op of Ostia Dean of the sacred college rising first, takes his bal-
lot, approaches the altar kneels, prays, then rises and says: '* I take
Christ our Lord to witness, that 1 vote for the one whom in the
sight of God I judge worthy, and I will do the same in case the
accessus is used." He then places his sealed ballot on the paten,
and allows it to drop from the paten into the chalice. In the or-
der of their rank, all the cardinals now do the same. The three
cardinals above mentioned collect the ballots of sick cardinals
with great ceremony, just after the vote of the dean of the college
has been deposited. All votes being deposited in the chalice, the
first cardinal inspector covers the chalice with the paten and
shakes it. The third cardinal inspector in the presence of all
counts the ballots from one chalice into another. If the number of
ballots does not agree with the number of cardinal electors, they
are burned and another election takes place. Besides other pro-
ceedings are taken to insure secrecy in the voting.
As only the name of the candidates, and the seal appears on
the outside af the folded ballot, the first inspector of the election
takes one ballot after the other, reads the candidate's names but
low to himself, the second does the same, and ])asses it to the
third, who reads the names of the candidate aloud, so all the other
cardinals can hear him. Each cardinal writes the name, so
read, and thus keeps the accounts of the number of votes cast for
HOW THE POPE IS ELECTED. ^85
the candidates. The third inspector after reading the names of
the candidate, strings all the ballots on a string and after knotting
the string puts them back into the chalice.
All the cardinals now look to see if the necessary two-thirds
votes have been given to any candidate, who by that becomes the
Pope. In case they cannot agree on any candidate, they may del-
egate certain members of the conclave to vote by proxy for the
whole assembly. In this case, there are wise rules laid down,
which we will not speak of now, as the rules are about the same
as given above with certain measures for exactness &c.
The ballots having been examined, and it has been found that
one of the candidates has received the required two-thirds votes,
he is the declared head of the church, the votes are burned and
the conclave is at an end. The youngest cardinal at the door of the
chapel rings a bell, which calls the atteiidant secretary of the con-
clave, with the master of ceremonies, who go to the cardinal-dean,
then with him all go to the Pope-elect, and standing before him,
the cardinal-dean asks: " Doest thou accept the canonical election
made of thee as Supreme Pontiff ? " If he replies " I Accept, "
at that moment he becomes the Bishop of Home, the head of the
church, the Vicar of Christ. If he were to refuse, the Chair of
Peter would be still vacant, and they would begin another election.
If he does not reply at once, the question is asked three times.
When he agrees or consents to accept the office, the master of cere-
monies claps his hands, the cardinal-dean genuflects before him;
all rise and remain standing, while the dean asks; "By what
name wilt thou be called ? " He then tells them the name by
which he will be known ever after. A record of all these cere-
monies is taken down and signed by the master of ceremonies.
The new Pope is thus taken by the oldest cardinal to the altars,
where after prayer, he is clothed in the white robes of the Supreme
Pontiff. Having seated himself at the altar, there he receives the
''obedience" of the cardinals. When the cardinal chamberlain
pays his homage to him he places on his finger the "Fisherman's
Ring." In the meantime the masons have removed the wall, and
all go in procession to the balcony over the main entrance to the
Vatican, ( If the election took place at the Vatican ), and the car-
dinal-deacon proclaims the election to the city and the people
waiting outside.
From the moment of his election, the elect of the cardinals is
the Pope, and he governs the whole church. Even Clement V.
threatens with excommunication those who would claim that his
orders are not to be obeyed before he is crowned. If the new Pope
is a layman, or in orders below a bishop, he must at once be or-
dained and consecrated a bishop. The ordaining and consecrat-
ing bishop in that case is the cardinal bishop of Ostia, the dean of
the holy senate of the cardinals. This ceremony of his episcopal
consecration must take place before he is crowned. In later
time it takes place in private.
286 THE COEONATION CEREMONIRS.
The coronation ceremonies usually take place on the following
Sunday, or on the next great feast after the election. Headed by
the papal cross, preceded by all the great dignitaries of the church,
marching in grand procession, the new Pope seated on his sedan
chair carried by the highest nobility of the eterual city, sur-
rounded by the ministers and embassadors of foreign nations,
guarded by the pontifical army, whose officers are nobles, enclosed
by the Swiss guard, they enter the great basilica of St. Peter's,
where he mounts the everlasting throne of the P'isherman of Gal-
ilee. First they come to the chapel of the Blessed Sacrament,
where they adore Christ there present and thank him for the suc-
cess of the election. Then they enter the Clementine chapel,
gorgeous with the works of the great masters of art. When the
Holy Father comes to the altar, he ascends the throne, and there
sitting he receives the homage of all the great cardinals, bishops,
clergy and laity of the church. He gives them his apostolic bless-
ing and intones the divine office of Tierce, which the papal choir
sings while he vests himself.
No man can attain a higher office than to be the bishop of Rome,
whose predecessors made and unmade nations and empires. From
the throne of Peter, he now looks down on all the peoples and
races of earth with benignity and fatherly kindness. Only death
or resignation can deprive him of his office. When again the pro-
cession forms, lest he might be carried away by his exalted
station, one of the masters of ceremonies draws near the Pope, and
three times he burns before him a little flax on a silver salver, say-
ing each time: " Holy Father thus passeth away the glory of
this world."
The Mass begins. The Pope recites the "Confiteor," two car-
dinals read the collects at the altar. The Pope now receives the
pallium from the cardinal dean which was once the garment of
the Jewish high priest saying: "Receive the holy pallium, the
fullness of Pontificial authority, in honor of God Almighty " &c.
He then incenses the high altar as a sign of prayer ascending to
the Most High. He again receives the homage of the cardinals,
patriarchs, primates, archbishops, bishops, abbots and officers of
the Roman Courts, as a sign of the complete power of Peter over the
whole church. The high Mass continues to the " Collect, " when
he again retires to the throne. Now the cardinal deacon with the
subdeacons, auditors, secretaries of the Roman church &c. go down
to the "Confession" of St. Peter, where respose the bodies of Sts.
Peter and Paul, where he repeats three times the words over the
tombs of their most illustrious apostles: "Life to our Lord, N-(call-
ing out the name of the new Pope) whom God has given us as Bish-
op, and Vicar of Christ" to which all reply: " 0 God help him O
Mary aid him." Then returning the high Mass is continued with-
out interruption to the end.
With great pomp after Mass the Pope goes to the balcony of
St. Peter's, where seated on a throne, the second in rank of the
THE POPE TAKING POSSESSION OF HIS CATHEDRA.L. 287
cardinal deacons, removes the bishop's mitre which he has worn,
and the dean of the college of cardinals places the tiara on his
head saying: " Receive the tiara adorned with the triple crown
and know that thou art the father of princes and kings, the ruler
of the earth, the Vicar of our Saviour Jesus Christ." The Pope
then solemnly gives his blessing to the people and receives the
congratulations of the cardinals.
The last act of the coronation ceremonies consists in the Pope
taking possession of his cathedral the Ba^licaof St. John Lateran,
the Cathedral of tlie Popes, the Mother Church of all the churches
of the world. For more than a thousand years, from the days of
Sts. Sylvester and of Constantine, the Popes lived in the Lateran
Palace, adjoining the Church of St. John Lateran, but since the
Popes took up their abode at St. Peter's at the Vatican, they
solemnly take charge of St. John Lateran. Informer times after
a light breakfast the Pope started for his cathedral on horseback,
followed by all the ofticials of church and state, all riding with
him a most striking procession.
In our day in his sedan chair the Pope is carried in this pro-
cession. At the bridge of St Angelo, under a triumphal arch —
one of the senators of Rome, who in the' times of the Republic
were compared to kings, with his ivory staff the image of the
•departed Roman empire addresses the Pope, and swears to him the
fidelity of the Roman people. The procession passes under the tri-
umphal arcli of Titus, built in remembrance of the sacking and of the
capture of Jerusalem according to the prophecy of our Lord, they
approach the vast ruins of the Coliseum built by the captive Jews,
where the chief rabbi of the exile Jews still living in Rome hands
the Pope the five books of Moses, (a copy of Genesis, Exodus,
Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy), asking his protection for his
people, which the Pope at once promises, a rebuke to the persecu-
tors of the Jews. At the portals of the historic St. John Lateran
the cardinal archpriest of tlie Lateran Basilica offers him a golden
cross, which he kisses. There he receives the homage of all the
clergy of his cathedral. Now the archpriest presents him with
the keys of the church, one of gold the other of silver, and then
he reads him an address. The vast procession then enters the
church and proceeds to the council hall, made famous by the
long residence of the great historic Popes, and by the audiences
given there to the most famous emperors, kings, men of letters
and historic personages of the past ages. The Pope then gives
to each a medal struck in memory of the event. From the bal-
cony of the church he blesses all the people, money is scattered
among them, and then he returns again to his great palace at the
Vatican.
We see that at the beginning of the foundation of the United
States, the states of Maryland and of Virginia gave a small part
of their territory to form the District of Columbia, so as to leave
•Congress free from state authority, and influence. That was a
288
THE pope's temporal DOMINION.
wise foresight. In the same way the Popes liave had from the
most remote times a small territory around Rome, which they
governed as kings in temporal authority so that they might be
free from any influence on the part of the governments of Europe.
This is absolutely wanted for the freedom of the Pope in his
government of the universal church. In him then the spiritual
and temporal governments of the world centres. In his person
the spiritual blesses tlje temporal authority of the earth. But
his power in the world is spiritual not temporal, for Christ whom
he represents said: " My kingdom is not of this world. "
If in former times, if he has taken part or settled disputes among
nations, it was because he was asked to do so, and because as the
Father of the faithful, he wanted to have peace and good will
among men.
The cardinals living in Rome meet once or twice a week with
the Pope as their chairman, to discuss the religious matters of the
whole world, the political and social movements taking place in all
nations. There they 'shape the policy of the Holy See. These
meetings had been held from the time of the apostles. With their
chairman the Pope, heir of that long and glorious line of Pontiffs all
the reigning royal and elective rulers are of yesterday compared
to the senate of cardinals, all the congresses, parliaments and leg-
islative assemblies are young, and no legislative body of men
can be likened to that august and venerable senate of the univer-
sal church. The councils and the histories of the Roman Church
are filled with the accounts of these meetings, wherein measures
were undertaken for all the christian nations of the world.
EXAMINING THE FOOD FOR LETTERS TO THE CARDINALS IN CONCLAVB.
agates, ADiegs
Vicars Apostolic, Notaries, &e.
tHE cardinals, senators of the universal church, aid the Pope
in his universal church government, when he dies they ad-
,^_^ minister the whole church, and then they elect his successor.
Stop for a moment to study this venerable senate with the
Pontiff their head. There on the chair of Peter the apostle, sits
a spiritual ruler head of a visible and universal spiritual govern-
ment, before which the empires of Cyrus, of Babylon, of Alexan-
der, of the Cesars seem dwarfed. No ruler of earth ever governed
men with such a title. Jesus Christ was the founder, God is the
upholder, the Holy Ghost makes the laws and men bow before him,
knowing that rebellion brings a curse on earth and damnation at
death. No royal house ever exercised such a sway over the souls
and bodies of men. Civil rulers govern, but their authority rests
on the changing principles of politics. Thrones tremble, govern-
ments rise and fall, nations change their rulei's, kingdoms become
republics or empires, peoples increase or diminish their territories
by wars or by conquests, their restless subjects chafing under the
sorrows of original sin seek relief hy changes of constitutions, by
throwing off the yokes of kings, while the sacred House of Peter
still lives rising aloft above them, yet still surviving, ruling the
universal church with all the power Christ left Peter. Thus, the
heirs of Peter the Roman Pontiffs stand in spite of the numberless
revolutions against them. They were witnesses of the birth of all
royal houses of to-day, and they will stand by and see the ruin and
B
THE CHURCH THE MOST ANCIENT. 291
the death of all modern governments, for they are the heirs of
Peter to whom Christ said: ''On this Rock I will build my church,
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against her."
The royal houses of the world to-day are as children compared
to that long line of noble Pontiffs, wno sat on the chair of the
humble Fisherman of Galilee. In ages past, the Bourbons of
France alone could be likened to them. But they died out with
Louis Philip of France and the Papacy withstood the revolutions
which unseated them. The llapsburgs of Austria go back but
a few hundred years, and in our day it totters; often were the royal
houses of England changed, and in our time the English govern-
ment rapidly changes to the form of a republic; the German empire
dates from 1701, when the elector of Brandburg became king in
the days of Luther; the house of Napoleon fell from the throne of
France; the autocratic Tzars of Russia whose histories are written
in blood took their rise with Ivan the Terrible; the Irish monarchs
have vanished from the earth; the house of Italy is of yesterday;
the United States, the gem of the earth go back but about a
hundred years, but compared to these the Roman Pontiffs stand
alone, linking the old world with the new, going back to the time
beyond the fall of the Roman empire, when all Europe was pagan,
when the smoke of the sacrifices ascended from the altars of the
false gods of Greece and of Rome.'
Stop for a moment and look at that sacred college of cardinals.
In their veins flows the noblest blood of earth. They are the sons
of the Romans, the children of these wonderful men who ten cen-
turies before Christ began the conquest of the world. They are
the heirs of the senators of Rome, the descendants of the Cesars, be-
fore whose sceptres empires crumbled, powerful emperors who made
and unmade nations, whose authority extended from the frozen
North to the burning sands of Africa, and from the Atlantic to the
rivers of India. Pagan Rome was but a figure and an image of
christian Rome, with her greater and more wonderful empire of
God and of his holy church. As the Roman senate in the days of
the pagan empire aided the Cesars in their empire of conquest,
spreading an infidel civilization, the Latin language and literature,
the sciences and arts which come down to us to this very day, so
the Pontiff with his sacred senate still spreads religion, peace and
the laws of christian prosperity over a much greater empire of
cbristendom, ruling and swaying souls even to the uttermost ends
of the earth.
From the very days of the apostles each bishop had his senate, or
body of priests, his advisers, which in the early church was called
the presbytery of the diocese. They met at stated times to advise
and help the bishop in his spiritual government. It is said and is
probable that each of the apostles had a senate of clergymen, copied
after the twelve apostles, with seven deacons images of the seven
deacons established at Jerusalem.^
* See Macauly Essay Ranke's Hist, of the Last Four Popes. ^ Acts. vl.
292 HOW THE SENATE MEETS.
Because of its universal government, the senate of the Roman
church was formed of a much larger number of priests and deacons.
The Koman Ceremonial says: '*But the senate of the Roman
church was instituted by St. Peter under the inspiration of God, as
it passes on all difficult business of the church."' St. Ignatius the
successor of Peter at Antioch calls them: "The holy meeting" "The
council" "The Assembly of the bishop." St. Jerome says: "The
church has a senate, a heavenly presbytery," and St. Cyprian
says that according to the apostolic custom, the bishop did
nothing without a consultation with his council. All authors say
that the senate of the Roman church was introduced by St. Peter
himself. Pope Siricius, elected in 384, called a meeting of the
Roman clergy, which was called the presbytery of the church, and
with their advice he condemned Jovinian, convicted of heresy.
In 483 Felix III. asked the advice of the presbytery of the Roman
priests and deacons, when he condemned and deposed the bad
Cuapheus who had intruded himself onto the episcopal throne of
Antioch. From numerous examples of the early church, we may
understand the dignity of the Roman clergy united as a senate or
legislative body with their Bishop as chairman.
When the cardinals meet in this senatorial form it is now called
a consistory, but in the early church they named it the senate or
presbytery of the Roman church. In our day the senate or con-
sistory of cardinals have private, semi-private and public sessions,
according as the business is private or public. The senate now
meets twice a month, but the Pope may call a special session at
any time. The Pope is the president of the senate or consistory
of cardinals. Each cardinal may speak privately with the Pope
before the session opens. The cardinals vote for or against the
measures proposed to the senate, but the Pope has always a vetoing
power, because he is the supreme legislative, judicial and executive
authority in the church.
In the consistory as described above, they discuss the most im-
portant business of the church, such as the selection of new cardi-
nals, the erection of archiepiscopalsees, the appointment of church
officers and other important church dignitaries, the changes of
discipline, the election or confirmation of bishops, the appointment
of coadjutor bishops, the creation of new dioceses, the unions or the
divisions of old dioceses, the giving of the pallium to an archbishop,
and generally matters of great importance, such as dealings with
kings, governments and such important matters. In the meetings
of the cardinals the Pope often preaches in Latin, on the state of
religion, the spread of the faith, the difficulties the church finds
on the part of governments, rulers &c.
The other Roman courts are composed not only of cardinals, but
also of special persons appointed by the Pope to aid him in the
government of the church. They are divided into prelates and
curials. The prelates are not only bishops living in Rome, with.
» L. I. Tit. I. 8. ft.
HOW BAD BOOKS ARE EXAMINED. 293
titles of dioceses now overrun by infidels, but also monsignors, who
wear the purple. A monsignor is a clergyman, not in episcopal
orders but attached to the Roman diocese, a member of the papal
household and of the Roman ecclesiastical courts. The honor is
-often conferred on distinguished priests in various parts of the
world. Attached to the Roman church courts, are many magis-
trates not in orders, besides lawyers, solicitors, notaries, &c., who
practice before the different ecclesiastical courts. As much busi-
ness coming from all parts of the world accumulated before the
Holy See, which one court alone could not look after, the Popes
appointed different courts, committees, congregations &c., to take
charge of the business. They are somewhat like the committees,
or bureaus at Washington for simplifying of the business accumu-
lating before the central government. We will give but a rapid
sketch of each.
The congregation of the holy office was formed to look after
matters of faith. The members of this committee were first chosen
from the most learned members of the famous orders of Sts. Dom-
inic and Francis. In the XIII. century Innocent III. gave thetn
their constitution according to which they act. The Pope him-
self is the prefect or president of the congregation of the inquisi-
tion, and the dean of the sacred congregation of cardinals is the
secretary. The number of cardinals belonging to this congregation
varied from time to time as seemed fit to the Pope. All matters
relating to heresy, apostasy from the faith, schisms in the church,
superstitious practices, the abuse of the sacraments, &c., come
before this tribunal, which has jurisdiction over all patriarchs,
archbishops, bishops, &c. If there be an appeal from the other
congregations about episcopal afairs, they bring it before this
committee. They formerly examined and forbid bad books, con-
demned false teachings, and looked after the most important mat-
ters relating to faith and morals. They are divided into two houses,
the house of cardinals and the house of consultors. The house or
congress of consultors meets each Monday, and deliberate on the
matters before the house. On the next "Wednesday the house of
cardinals meet, without the Pope as chairman and hear the reports
of the consultors. If the matter be of little importance, they then
pronounce sentence. But usually after deliberating, they post-
pone the final sentence till the next day, when they meet again with
the Pope as chairman, whose sentence ends the whole matter. In
condemning a bad and immoral book the congregation of the
index appoints a censor to read it. If he condemn it, they se-
cretly appoint another, when both agree in condemning it the
book with the parts marked which are erroneous or immoral is
brought before the whole congregation. If the both readers do
not agree, they secretly appoint a third and pass on the judgments
of the three consultors
The church from its very foundation ever exercised the right of
forbidding bad and immoral books, for nothing so poisons the mind
294 VARIOUS GOVERNMENT BUREAUS.
of men as bad and erroneous teachings. Since the invention of
printing, the press has become a vast power for good or evil. But
with greatest care the church has ever forbidden and proscribed
bad and filthy books, lest they might poison the minds of the
faithful. Paul III. conferred the duty of examining such books
on the congregation of the office. But when at the reformation,
the number of such books increased, so that the latter committee
could not find time to examine them, PaulIV. commanded that
they draw up an index giving the names of all such bad books.
They published it in 1559. The council of Trent selected 18 fath-
ers to revise the catalogue of forbidden books, but they referred it
to the Holy See. Paul IV. appointed the most learned men in the
church to look after the matter, and Clement VIII. in 1594 or-
dered that the list of bad books be published to the whole world.
As the congregation of the office had so much business that they
could not see after bad books, Paul V. appointed a special com-
mittee for that purpose. It is called the congregation of the index.
Pious IV. founded a congregation for defining and executing^
the decrees of the council of Trent. Later Popes delegated to
it the examination of the decrees of provincial synods, the receiv-
ing of the accounts of the state of religion, and the reports of the
bishops coming from all parts of the world on their visits to the
tombs of the apostles, replying to their requests, seeing to their
business, and promoting special devotions in their dioceses.
In 1587 Sixtus V. formed the committee or congregation of rites
which is composed of a cardinal prefect, as well as other cardinals,
consultors, a secretary, a sub-secretary, a chancellor and other offi-
cers. This bureau sees that the ancient rites and ceremonies of the
church are carried out in all parts of the world. They supervise the
masses, the divine offices and the administration of the sacraments.
They also correct abuses, revise aud correct the ceremonial, and the
official books relating to these rites. They also examine the
case of the canonization of the saints, and see that kings, princes
and persons of authority coming to the Holy See are received
with proper honors. But the Pope himself issues the decree of
the canonization of the saints, after this congregation pronounces
on the proofs of the holiness of the servant of God, which the church
wishes to hold up as an example to all men. The church canon-
izes a saint only after the most extraordinary proofs of a holy life,,
an edifying death, and well attested miracles after his decease.
In 1G68 Clement IX. formed the congregation of regulars for
Italy, which Innocent X. and Innocent XI. confirmed for the
whole world. They regulate matters relating to the religious
orders, their novitiate, their vows, their suspensions, the exten-
sion of the order, the reception of members and the confirmation of
their constitutions. Innocent XII. formed a branch of it for reg-
ulating the discipline of the religious orders. This was confirmed
with little change by Pius IX.
Gregory XIII. and Sixtus V. established the congregation of
THE CONGREGATION OF THE PROPAGANDA. 295
bishops and regulars, before which come all matters relating to
bishops, the administration of their dioceses. This bureau hears
complaints against bishops and decides charges of a minor nature
against them, their vicars general, and other officials of the diocese.
They also appoint administrators of the diocese, when the bishop
becomes incapable, settle disputes between different religious
orders, and between them and bishops as well as controversies of
that kind.
In 1622 Gregory XV. instituted the congregation of the prop-
aganda for the spreading of the faith into all parts of the world.
The church in all countries where the full machinery of the
diocese cannot be enforced is under the supervision of this con-
gregation.
The church throughout the world may be considered in two
respects, where the common law or canon law prevails, or where the
bishops have not the title of the episcopal see where he lives, but
when he has the title of a see in the hands of the infidels, and where
he administers the churches not as their bishop, but as the vicar or
delegate of the Pope, waiting till the diocese has grown so as to
become a perfect church with its own bishop. In the latter case
it is a missionary diocese, or it is like a territory waiting to be ad-
mitted into the church as a perfect diocese, with its own titular
bishop. Thus where the larger number of citizens are not catholics,
the church is considered to be in a missionary state, and it is sub-
ject to the congregation of the propaganda, while matters of
purely catholic countries come before the regular bureaus or con-
gregations in Rome. The propaganda then has within itself, in
certain degree, the authority of all the other committees at Eome,
for the settlement of matters belonging to missionary countries.
Nearly two-thirds of the countries of the world are under the
direction of this committee, whose authority is both legislative,
judicial and administrative. But matters of great moment go
before the Pope himself. According to Urban VIII. and Innocent
X. when the decrees of this committee are signed by the cardinal
prefect and the secretary, they have the force of a pontifical law.
They educate young men for the ministry, and send them to all
parts of the world to preach the Gospel to pagan and infidel na-
tions, and receive clergymen coming from all parts of the world,
to lay before the feet of his Holiness the accounts of their labors
of the church. Almost all the languages of the world may be
heard within the great palace of the propaganda, built for this con-
gregation by Urban VIII. They spend vast sums of money for
the support of these numerous missions. An ordinary meeting
of the congregation takes place before the cardinal prefect and
secretary, where the business to come before the full meeting is
arranged. Later the whole committee discusses the business and
their sentence is laid before the Pope, who confirms or vetoes it.
In the beginning of this century so many political questions
came up, that the other committees could not find time to attend to
296 OTHER COMMITTEES.
them, and Pius VII. in 1814 established the congregation of extraor-
dinary church matters to settle them. They are bound by the most
solemn oaths not to reveal what takes place in this committee.
In 1669 Clement IX. delegated to the congregation of indul-
gences and relics the power of regulating indulgences, settling
doubts about them, and the care of the remains of the saints and
martyrs. They root out abuses regarding these things, condemn
false and erroneous teachings about relics, but they do not pass on
matters of christian doctrines, as this belongs to the congregation of
the office described above. The general indulgences granted by
the church are null and void unless they bear the signature of
the secretary of this committee.
By the common law of the church, each bishop must live in
his diocese, and Urban VIII. founded a congregation to see that
these laws are carried out. Benedict XIV. appointed a prosecut-
ing lawyer, who will proceed against a bishop, who breaks these
laws and oblige him to live in his diocese. When for reasonable
cause, the bishop must leave his diocese for a time, the Holy See
will give him the necessary permission.
The congregation of immunity from the interference of the
civil authorities was erected by Urban VIII., to take measures to
protect the church and her ministers from all secular abuses and
intermeddlings. The business coming before this committee
nearly always arises in the pontifical states, and in nations having
an agreement or concordate with the Holy See, about the freedom
of divine worship, the support of the church, &c.
From the very beginning the church has shown her hatred and
abhorrence of great and atrocious crimes, so that she ever visited
severe censures on those guilty of them. These are called ecclesi-
astical censures and punishments. The first Popes usually reserve
to themselves tlie absolution of these great penalties. In 1744
Benedict XIV. in his constitution gave the reasons for forming
the tribunal of the penitentiary, which is a court for the remission
of such great punishments and censures reserved to the Pope.
This court also grants dispensations, changes of vows, &c. Some
writers find the origin of this court in the power given certain
priests in the days of Sts. Cornelius and Cyprian, who imposed
penances on the Christians, who fell by weakness during the per-
secutions, and took measures to reconcile them to the church.
They were called penitentiary priests. Many later Pontiffs ex-
tended their powers and jurisdiction. When a person has commit-
ted a great crime reserved to the Holy See, he can write to the card-
inal of the penitentiary in any language, not giving the name,
but the sin with all the circumstances relating to it, as well as the
name of the clergyman to whom lie will direct his reply, and the
cardinal will empower a clergyman to absolve the sinner from the
censures and the crime.
The apostolic or chancery office sees to the issuing of pontifical
bulls and letters of the Pope. They are called bulls. Ihtjiusc they
IMPORTANT OFFICIALS. 297
are sealed with a little lead ball called in Italian a "bulla. " The
chancery of the Eoman church, is one of the most ancient offices
in the church. St. Jerome says: " For many years I helped Da-
masus, Bishop of the Roman church, taking care of his ecclesiastical
papers, and replying to questions coming from synods both of tho
East and of the West. " ' The name chancery was given to it
later. In the early church it was called the notary's or librarian's
office, &c. In former times churchmen below cardinals held the
office. The Jurisdiction of this court or office of vice-chancellor
ceases at the death of the Pope, and then the vice-chancellor
breaks the fisherman's ring before the cardinals. The datery is
an office by which the Pontiff grants benefices, pensions, honors
and dignities to worthy clergymen and dispenses in irregularities
in marriages, &c.
The rota is the most ancient court of the Roman church. This
tribunal in the early church heard appeals, examined controversies,
and replied to questions asked the Pontiff coming by people of
different parts of the world. They did not give any decision, as
that belongs to the Pope, but they heard the questions and in-
formed the Pontiff about the matters asked. Later when the
Pope was so occupied that he could not give his time to these
matters, the court of the rota defined and settled such business.
John XXII. laid down the rules they follow in the court. This
tribunal often settled civil disputes between nations, peoples and
princes, thus often prevented war. The officers of this court are
called auditors, from their original duty of hearing the cases re-
ferred to them in the ancient church. They act both as chaplains
and subdeacons of the Pontiff on ceremonies. The oldest of the
twelve auditors presides as chairman of the meeting. Before the
French revolution they were chosen from Italy, Austria, Spain,
France, the republic of Venice, and other christian nations. They
are France Venice two from Spain often appointed by the govern-
ments of these nations and confirmed by the Pope. In serving the
Pope on ceremonies the deacon always wears the episcopal mitre.
One of the most important officials of the Roman church is the
cardinal secretary of state, before whom comes all political and
government matters, The Pontiff, head of a supreme spiritual
empire, enters into relation with supreme nations, governments
&c., and the secretary of statedeals with them as the prime minis-
ter of the Pope, a spiritual sovereign over the vast kingdom of
Christ spread throughout the whole world, above and independent
of all civil rulers.
As defined by the Vatican council, proved by the voice of tra-
dition and by the very constitution of the church, the Roman
Pontiff is the Vicar of Christ and has direct and universal juris-
diction over every soul redeemed by our blessed Lord. On him
rests the government of the whole church. For the first VIII.
centuries the Bishops of Rome used to send vicars and churchmen
* Eplst ad Gerantine de Monogam.
298 ANCIENT VICAKS OF THE POPE.
to every part of the christian world to represent him, and in his
name to administer the church laws and carry out the discipline.
From the time when Constantine moved his empire to the banks
of the Bosphorus, fixing his seat at Byzantium, whicli he called
Constantinople, the Pope had appointed his vicar at the seat of
the Koman empire, who informed him on all matters relating to
the church in the Greek empire. ' These vicars of the Pope liad
more or less jurisdition over the churches in these co'.intries to
which they were sent.' In 682 Constantinus Pogonatus wrote to
Leo II.: " I exhort your most holy Supremacy, that as soon as
convenient you send as customary a legate, that all matters be re-
ferred to him."' The Pope appointed Anysius bishop of Thessa-
lonica his vicar for the JUirican regions, and Innocent I. con-
firmed the office. Innocent in 412 appointed a new nuncio for
that country. In 422 Boniface wrote to that bishop, telling him
to look after the dioceses and churches in these provinces. ■• He
wrote another letter to the bishops of the province of Thessaly
reproving them for not obeying the laws as was customary with
their fathers. The Pontiffs from the very beginning of the
church, used to appoint such vicars over the bishops of certain
kingdoms and nations, directing them to see that the laws and
disciplines of the church were carried out.
In France the archbishops of Aries had, it seems, been appointed
by the Popes their vicars before the appointment of the bishops of
Thessalonica. In 461 Hilary wrote to Leontius, bishop of Aries,
about Hermetes, a bishop who had unjustly invaded the see of
Narbon, reproving him for not reporting the dispute to the Roman
See.' In /iM Hormistas appointed Kemigius his legate over the
churches of the kingdom of King Clovis, where so many had lately
been converted to the church.
Simplicius elected in 467 appointed Zeno his vicar over the
churches of Spain." The same Pope nominated Sallustius his vicar
for Portugal. Gregory the Great sent Peter, a deacon of the Roman
church, as his legate to the churches of Sicily, and Gregory II.
sent St. Boniface as his legate to the churches of Germany, thus
in all ages the Holy Pontiffs looked after the church in different
parts of the world. For the first eight centuries the bisiiops of
the most important sees acted as permanent agents or vicars of the
Popes. From the ninth to the fifteenth centuries the Popes ap-
pointed regular legates. From that time they nominated embas-
sadors, legates and nuncios to represent them at the seats of differ-
ent governments.
A legate of the Holy See has ordinary jurisdiction in the province
or country to whom the Pope sends him. A legate differs from a
ablegate in this, that the former has authority over all cases brought
before him, while the latter is appointed only for certain and
specified cases. Whereas a legate has the same power as the Pope
» Hlncmar T. II. p. 20. 206. » Ivo Eptet 50. » Ccncll Hard. T. III. col. 1468.
* Lab. T. V. col. 840. * Lab. T. IV. ooL 1040. • Lab. T. IV. col. 1U68.
EMBASSADOKS, LEGATES AlfD 7ICAKS OF THE HOLY SEE. 299
himself, while an ablegate has only a restricted authority, deter-
mined by the Holy See on his nomination. But the 'Pope can
restrict any embassador or nuncio. Such embassadors can subdele-
gate their power to another. Their powers do not cease at the
death of the Pope, who sends them. In cases of appeal from the
episcopal courts, the matter comes before them, before being ap-
pealed to the Holy See. This was decided by Alexander III.
against the archbishop of Canterbury and also by the council of
Trent.' But when the Pope delegates any special case, another
legate cannot touch it. A legate has also legislative power in the
province to whom he is seiU and can take measures for the reforma-
tion of discipliue. But from the time of the council of Trent, he
cannot proceed criminally against any bishop or archbishop, that
being reserved to the Holy See. As a general rule a legate can do
what a bishop or archbishop can do in his diocese or archdiocese.
In the early ages of the church, the Pope used to appoint bishops
over all the archbishops, bishops and churches within a certain
territory. They were called the vicars of the Apostolic See. They
differed but little from the legates of modern time. Thus Pope
Damasus appointed the archbishop of Thessalonica liis vicar over
the neighboring bishops. Hermodistas thus nominated the arch-
bishop of Tarracon his vicar in parts of Spain and Portugal, and
appointed archbishop Eemigius of Eeims . his vicar over the
churches of southern France. Even to our day the cardinal vicar
of the Pope rules the diocese of Rome.
In our day vicars apostlic are bishops, whom the Pope appoints
to rule certain missionary regions, where the faithful are too few
and scattered for a diocese with its own bishop. They admin-
ister these churches, not in their own, but in the name of the Pope.
The bishops of the regular dioceses have in their own name the
ordinary power of ruling both in external and internal jurisdiction,
while vicars apostolic govern not in their own, but in the name of
the Pope. Some vicars apostolic are bishops with the titles of the
old sees now overrun by the infidels, w^hile others are only simple
priests with episcopal jurisdiction in their vicariates. The latter
are called Apostolic prefects. They are nearly always consecrated
bishops of these old sees, so they can confirm and ordain the
clergy. The quasi-dioceses which they govern are in a territorial
state, waiting till they can be erected into regular dioceses. Such
are the numerous districts of Africa, Asia and America, where a
canonical diocese cannot be formed, or the clergy and churches
supported. They are missionary countries. Again when the bish-
op of a diocese dies, leaves, or becomes incapable of governing his
diocese, a vicar capitular or an administrator is appointed to rule
during the vacancy, not as the pastor of the diocese, but as the
vicar of the Holy See. According to Benedict XIV. the bishops
.should appoint a vicar general who at their death, becomes the
Ticar apostolic, during the vacancy of the see.
1 Cap. Cum non Ignor. I de Officio Legal. Concil Trid. Cap. 20 Ses. 84.
300 APOSTOLIC ADMINI8TRATI0N.
These missionary regions, being directly under the jurisdiction
of the propaganda, this congregation makes laws for the government
of the churches. All appeals come before this tribunal, but
matters of great importance came before the Pope himself.
When because of old age, bad health, or for other causes a bish-
op cannot govern his diocese, the Holy See either appoints a coad-
jutor to help him, or an administrator of the diocese so the churches
may not suffer. In these cases it is customary to consecrate the
administrator to the episcopal oflBce, so he may ordain, confirm,
and carry out the episcopal duties, when he becomes the administra-
tor. When the bishop retains the title of the see, the latter or titu-
lar bishop can exercise no act of jurisdiction, without the consent of
the administrator, for the latter has the whole administration in
his hands.
In the early ages of the church Clement I, and Antherus appoint-
ed learned men to write the histories and lives of the martyrs, so
that the histories of their heroic deaths might go down as examples
to posterity. They were called notaries, but when they were hon-
ored by special dignity they were named proto-notaries. Former-
ly they took precedence of bishops, but Pius II. ordained thafc
bishops even elected and not consecrated should precede them. In
public consistories or meetings of the cardinals, when the Pope
takes possession of his cathedral of St. John Lateran, receives
kings in audience, &c. four notaries sit next the Pope and then
these notaries precede bishops and archbishops not taking part in
the pontifical ceremonies.
tHE church is like a vast army of the people of God, " in bat-
tle array," fighting out their salvation under her different
grades of officers divided into distinct ranks, with author-
ity which comes from Jurisdiction and not from holy
orders. For the power Christ left the church divides into two
distinct streams ever flowing down from him. They are holy
orders and jurisdiction. Holy orders relate to the real body of
■Clirist born of the Virgin and to the sacraments he left for the feed-
ing of his people, while jurisdiction relates to the government of
aoi
ST. REMUS BAPTIZING KINO CL0VI8 IN THE CATHEDRAL RHEIMS.
BBAl<fCHES OF PETER^S AUTHORITY. 303
the mystic body of Christ, his holy church. The head of holy
orders is the bishop the chief administer of the sacraments, while
the head of jurisdiction is the Pope the chief ruler of the church.
The Lord while on earth founded his church on the apostles,
heads of the dioceses, and in Peter the Papacy. The apostles then
were the heads of holy orders and Peter the head of jurisdiction.
The church, the mystic body of Christ, is a vast kingdom, a per-
fect spiritual government of souls, and he rules his kingdom by
and through his prime minister, the Pope the heir of Peter to
whom he gave all jurisdiction.
In holy orders all the bishops of the world are equal, as the
apostles were equal. But to one to Peter he gave complete juris-
diction saying: '' Feed my lambs. Feed my sheep." ' But for the
better government of such a vast empire over the souls of men, it
was meet and right that the rays of complete jurisdiction centring
in the heir of Peter, might flow unto other bishops, and that
the care of the whole church given to the Prince of the Apostles,
might be divided among the other bishops scattered throughout
the world. The bishops then are equal in holy orders but they
are not the same regarding jurisdiction. For the patriarchs, pri-
mates and archbishops partake in the jurisdiction of the Pope,
and they are the aids and the lieutenants of the Roman Pontiff.
They are appointed by him "not to partake in the fulness of his,
power, but to a part of his care of souls.""
Thus the Vicar of Christ, by appointment, sends down on some~
of his brethren in the episcopacy parts of his supreme jurisdic-
tion, by w|iich they preside over the bishops of the surrounding
country, and by that he makes them so many images of himself.
The patriarchs, primates and archbishops partake in a way in the
the primacy of Peter. They have a share in the care of the Pope
over the bishops of the provinces under them. As the Pope is
over the whole episcopacy, so they are over the bishops in, their
provinces. One of the peculiar qualities of creatures is, that each
part is but a reproduction of the whole. Thus any part of a
metal has all the perfections of the whole. As I look through
the window I see some beautiful spruce and pine trees before me.
But each limb is but a copy and an image of the central trunk,
each limb is a reproduction of the whole tree. Our Lord himself
compares his church to a vine of which we are the branches,
to a "grain of mustard seed," a peculiar tree of Syria "which
filled the whole earth." ^
The archbishops, patriarchs, &c., are but the branches of
the Papacy, ''All the apostles are equal, but to one was given
to preside ever the others. That is the image of Peter thus im-
pressed on the whole church, that there might be in each province
certain ones, who would have the chief sentence, and again that
those who were in the larger cities might have larger charges, so
that the care of the whole church might flow to the one chair of
1 John xxli. 2 §(;_ Leo Eplst. xiv. ad Anast. Thess. n. I. ^ jjatt. .xui. 31, 33, 33.
304 ORIGIN OF ARCHBISHOPS.
Peter, and that nothing might fall away from the head." ' Such
therefore is the nature, the origin of the great foundations of
these archiepiscopal sees we find so celebrated in history. These
bishops became heads over their neighboring bishops and churches,
not because they were elected to that office by the bishops, because
the bishops being all equal, they could not give what they did not
have, authority over each other. That power and authority of
the metropolitan cities came from the Successor of Peter, who
alone received that power from Christ. Tlie archbishops are as so
many little papacies over their suffragans and the churches under
them.
We find that they were established at the very beginning of the
church. They are not archbishops, because they are the succes-
sors of the apostles, but because they were established by the
Eoman Pontiffs. Thus the apostles with Peter appointed St.
James the first bishop of Jerusalem. But neither James nor his
successors in that old and venerable see, had any authority over
the neighboring bishops. He, like them, was subject to the
archbishop of Oesarea. St. John the Evangelist lived the latter
part of his life at Ephesus, of which St. Timothy was the first
bishop. But he and his successors in that see were subject to tlie
patriarch of Antioch, Peter's first church. St. Timothy as well
as St. Titus, consecrated bishops by St. Paul, became subject to
the patriarch of Antioch. It is true that now Jerusalem is the
seat of a patriarch, but for many centuries in the early church it
was only a simple bishopric. All these are striking examples
among the many other historic facts which we could cite from
the very apostolic days, proclaiming the Primacy of Peter and the
supremacy of the Popes.
Who knows the intimate and familiar counsels, advices and di-
rections which Christ gave the apostles, and especially to his chief,
Peter, during the three and a half years he lived among them?
St. John says the world would not contain all the books if all the
Lord told them were written down. For several years after the
ascension the apostles lived at Jerusalem. They were all then
missionary bishops. They went back and forth establishing
churches and missions. The title of bishop of Jerusalem was
first given to St. James. Why was not that city of the scenes of
life and death of our Lord made the centre of the church?— be-
cause of the rejection of the Jews and the calling of the Gentiles.
When the apostles separated, it was to preach to the Gentiles sit-
ting in the darkness of the shadows of death.
After his vision at Joppa of the clean and unclean animals, St.
Peter turned his face towards the great West. First he stopped at
Antioch. There for seven years he lived and labored. Then, either
inspired by the Holy Spirit, or following the directions given him
by Christ before the ascension, he turns his steps towards Rome,
and there on the very steps of the Caesar's throne ho fixes
* St. Leo Epist. zlT. ad Anast Tbess. n. I.
ST. PETER ESTABLISHES ARCHBISHOPS. 305
his apostolic Chair. He brought the whole machinery of the
government of the church from Jerusalem to the imperial City,
and there the heart of the church, Peter lives till this very day in
his successors the Popes.
He consecrated his companion, and disciple St. Evodius, as
bishop of Antioch. Before this he had sent his disciple St. Mark
to become the first bishop of Alexandria. While living at Anti-
och Peter directed the missionary labors of the other apostles. It
is said that while he lived at Antioch he gave the care of the Jew-
ishjcon verts to St. Evodius a Jew, and that St. Ignatius a Gentile
took care of the converts coming from the Gentiles. When leav-
ing for Eome he gave the care of the churches to his two chief
disciples Sts. Evodius and Mark, because they had lived long
with him and had become imbued with his spirit. Evodius
looked after the churches of that part of Asia, while St. Mark
superintended the aifairs of the church in Egypt and Lybia.
Such was the beginning of the archbishops, primates and patri-
archs in the church. In the early church they came from Peter
like all great church movements, as to-day they come by appoint-
ment of Peter's successors.
Therefore we see that Peter first laid the foundations of, and
presided over the establishment of the three great historic sees of
Antioch, of Alexandria and of Eome. The first was the chief city
of Asia, the second the metropolis of Egypt and of Lybia, while
the third was the great central city of Europe. Then by him-
self or through his two intimate disciples, Peter gave the faith
to the three great geographical divisions of the old continents.
But there is another lesson to learn from these first metropolitan
cities of Peter. The first bishops of Antioch presided over the
bishops of all the neighboring countries of Asia, while the suc-
cessors of St. Mark supervised the churches of Egypt and of Lybia,
yet Antioch and Alexandria rest not in the centres of countries
over which their first bishops presided as patriarchs, images of
Peter. These cities are on the borders of the Mediterranean
Sea, so that they can at once communicate with Rome the central
city where Peter lived so long. The bishops of these cities were
to become the channels of communication between these churches
and the head the Popes of Rome.
We are sometimes astonished why writers do not see the real
reason why Peter stopped at Antioch on his way to Rome. Was
it not to establish the patriarchate of Antioch as a striking exam-
ple to all future ages, to show that the archbishops, primates and
patriarchs came from no other source but from the Papacy? Be-
sides we would naturally conclude that Antioch would be the
chief see after Rome, but it is not. During all the early ages,
Alexandria was the chief see af terRome. When Constantine found-
ed on the site of the little city of Byzantium the imperial city of
Constantinople, when he moved there the seat of the vast Roman
Empire, the bishops of the imperial city of Constantinople became
306 HISTORIC ABCHDIOCESES.
very prominent. Before the founding of the great city, the bish-
ops of Byzantium were subject to the archbishops of Heraclea.
Because of the prominence of the city of Constantinople, as the
seat of the Koman empire, it soon became the seat of an archbish-
op, and soon it applied for the first place after Eome, which Alex-
andria held at that time. But that question was agitated in the
council of Chalcedon, and the measure was passed but it was
later disapproved by the Pope. Thus Constantinople got the
honor of being the first patriarchate after Rome from Pope
Innocent III. at the Lateran council. From the days of
the apostles, the chief cities of the converted world became
the seat of Archbishops, each having under him a more
or less numerous episcopate. Thus while Jerusalem, the very
fountain-head of the christian religion and of the Gospels, re-
mained for some time the seat of a simple bishop, successor of
St. James put lo death by the impious Ilerod, Cesarea, Herac-
lea, Carthage, 1'oledo, Constantinople, Ephesusj Antioch, Alexan-
dria and other cities early became the seats of celebrated archbish-
ops, and centres of great religious activity. They looked in the
early church for guidance not to Jerusalem, the see of James, nor
to Ephesus the home of John the see of Timothy, not to Alex-
andria where Mark lived, but to Eome where Peter died.
The whole history of the apostolic ages tells us, that Peter
founded the three great sees of Rome, of Alexandria and of Anti-
och. The other great cities of the world by consent of Petei'^s
successors soon became the seats of archbishops, primates and
patriarchs. But the church also showed that she is not obliged
to follow the civil and political divisions of countries. That she
proved in the establishment of the primitive episcopal sees of
Asia Minor, of Pontus, of Thrace and of Gaul. When Pope Syl-
vester in 325 called the bishops of the world together to deliberate
regarding the celebration of Easter, and to condemn Arius for de-
nying Christ's divinity, nearly every chief city was the residence
of an archbishop. In the expressive Greek languages they were
called metropolitans, which means the mother cities. This
may be seen in the provincial councils called by the Popes who
lived a few years removed from Peter and the apostolic age. '
But antiquity shows us the Roman Pontiff, rising like a pillar. of
light from the supreme Throne of the Fisherman, above the
archbishops, the primates and the patriarchs of every country of
the ancient world. As St. Boniface says: " The universal custom
of the rising church was to derive all from the primacy, in honor
of blessed Peter, in which his authority and primacy consisted
... all this was given by the word of the Lord. The council of
Chalcedon attended by 318 bishops re-echoed tte voice of an-
tiqjuity by proclaiming: " That the Roman church always held the
primacy.^' ' These ancient councils and monuments of antiquity
» See Labbe Concll. ' St. Boniface I. Eptet. ad Eplacop. Thess. T. iv. col. 1706.
» Concll. Chalcld. act. xvl. col. 812.
ARCHDIOCESES IN ANCIENT TIMES. 307
show us, that the priesthood, the episcopacy and the Papacy were
established by the Lord Jesus himself. But the patriarchs, pri-
mates and the archbishops are purely church institutions, and de-
rive all their force from church polity and ecclesiastical law.
They are the images and the shadows of the Papacy.
The highest representatives of St. Peter in the world are there-
fore the patriarchs. St. Peter first founded them by the ap-
pointment of Sts. Evodiiis and Mark, to the cities of Antioch
and of Alexandria. They were to represent him in the churches
of Asia and of Africa, while he was the great patriarch of the
West, living at the seat of the Roman empire. He reserved in a
special way to himself the Latin nations conquered and governed
by the Romans, with the North-west of Africa and the Greek j)onin-
sula. Tliat was to show in a striking way the primacy of Peter over
all the otiier apostles. As St. Gregory says: "Although there were
many apostles, nevertheless the See of one, of the prince of the
apostles, prevailed over all in authority. It is in three places,
yet it is of one. He raised up his see in which he was to rest and
end his life. He honored the see to which he sent his disciple the
Evangelist. He strengthened the see in which he lived for seven
years. "^ . In the words of the Hincmar: ''The chief sees of the
cliurcli are at Rome, at Alexandria and at Antioch although
they are separated by distance, they are but the one see of the
great Peter, Prince of the apostles.'"
Antiquity tells us that St. Peter founded many episcopal sees
besides the three above mentioned, but these were his in a special
manner. They were the organs or the channels by which he com-
municated witli these vast regions of the world. ^ The reader
will now see that the patriarchs, primates and archbishops partake
in a part of the primacy of the Pope, that with him they have a
certain authority over their suffragan bishops both clergy and
people, not that they were elected to tliat office by the latter, but
they were appointed to it by the Roman Pontiff, whom they rep-
resent. "
The patriarchs are the occupants of the oldest and most vener-
able sees m the world after Rome. We have already spoken
enough of the patriarchs of Alexandria and of Antioch. The
Pope having in his august person all the perfections of tlie clergy
below him, he has always been the patriarch of the West, as well
as the primate of Italy, the archbishop of the Roman province,
and the Bishop of Rome. Soon after the time of the Apostles^
the cities of Ephesus, Heraclea and of Cesarea became the seats of
archbishops. In later times the archbishop of Aquila received
the honor of being called a patriarch.
All know how the Greeks separated from us in the eleventh
century. But they have in many cases come back again and be-
come reconciled to" the church. This reconciliation of the schis-
> Greg. Mag. Eulog. Alexander. L. vli. Epist. xl. 2 pjjnp Qpp. t. li. p 431 Ed Miirne
3 St. Leo Episl. xiv, ad Anast. ■» Coucil. Lugd. II. ap. Lab. T.' xi. col. 966!
308 PATBIARCHS, PRIMATES AND ARCHBISHOPS.
matics has increased the number of the patriarchs. For to keep
them in union with us, the Holy See allowed their chief bishops to
retain the old and venerable title of the patriarchate. Thus we
have the patriarchs of Constantinople, of Alexandria and of Jeru-
salem, both for the Latin and Greek liturgies, a third of
Alexandria and of Antioch, for the Coptic and Maronite Rites.
Besides these there are others for the Ethiopians, the Armenians,
the Chaldeans, the Syrians and one for the East Indies.
The patriarchal sees we have mentioned, do not exhaust all
the riches of the Papacy. These vast regions over which Peter
appointed his disciples, Evodius and Mark, were in their turn
divided up again into ecclesiastical provinces, each presided over
by a primate or an archbishop. The primate from the Latin primus
is the first bishop in a nation, the archbishop is the chief bishop
of a province, while a patriarch from the Latin father is the
father of bishops. Hence a patriarch is a bishop of one of the old
apostolic sees, a primate sits on the first seat of a nation while an
archbishop is a bishop of the chief or metropolitan city.
Then the patriarchs, primates and archbishops are but so many
branches of the Papacy. They represent and carry out in their
person the power and authority given to Peter: " Feed my lambs
Feed my sheep;" by that supreme apostolate ruling other bishops
and churches under them. Whence they always preside over the
other bishops of their provinces, or nations, or patriarchates under
them. When the decision of the bishop is disputed the appeal is
taken before the archbishop, and if the latter's sentence seems not
just the appeal is taken to Eome. The archl)ishops in our age
have authority only in provincial councils, in visitations and in
appeals. In former times because of the difficulties of travelling,
or of acquainting Rome with the details of administration of far
distant countries, the archbishops, primates or patriarchates as dele-
gates of the Holy See approved the election of bishops, and regu-
lated many things now reserved to the Popes. That was the
ancient discipline because of the difficulty of laying these matters
before the Roman Congregations, which did not exist in the early
ages. '
The patriarch, primate and archbishop, presiding over these
bishops, are so many images of the Papacy over the whole chris-
tian world. St. Peter rules them in the person of the metropolitan
wearing the pallium taken from the tomb of the Prince of the
apostles. For that reason St. Leo calls them " The forms of Peter
offered to the episcopacy." The reader now sees that one bishop
can have no authority over another except it comes from the
Chair of Peter, to whom Christ gave it saying: " Feed my
lambs Feed my sheep."' St. James bishop of Jerusalem, and
one of the apostles would certainly claim authority over the other
pishops of Palestine and of Syria, if it came from his apostolate.
But history tells us that his see was also subject to the archbishop
• Const. Apost. Can. 9 Lab. T. I. col. 31. Concll. Laodlc. Can. 12. col. 1498. * John xxL
THE CLERGY OF THE ARCHDIOCESE. 309
of Cesarea, while the bishops of Antioch and of Alexandria and of
Kome shine forth in all antiquity with the glorious powers of
Peter, although they were only disciples and had not the honor of
the apofetolate like Sts. James, John and the other apostles.
The clergy of Eome partake in the honor, power and dignity of
their bishop, the Pope. They assist him in the government of
the Roman diocese, and of the whole church. They govern the
church universal; when the See of Rome is vacant, they elect his
successor. In a like way the clergy of the patriarchal, primatical
and metropolitan dioceses partake in the honors and powers of their
bishops. They aid them in the ruling of these churches, they
govern the diocese when the see is vacant and they present to the
Pope a candidate for the widowed church.
Whence we see that all through the church, the clergy of these
great and honorable sees have taken an active part in matters, be-
longing not only to their own dioceses, but also in things relating
to the other dioceses, over which the archbishop primate or pa-
triarch presided as metropolitans. When any one appeals from
the bishop to the archbishop, the latter lays the matter before his
most learned clergy and asks their advice before giving his de-
cision. The archbishop is surrounded by his court of clergymen his
crown, who partake in the splendors of his powers over the other
bishops of his province. Whence during a provincial council the
most important offices are filled by the clergy of the archdiocese.
In the same way, the clergy of the great patriarchal sees stand in
higher honor than the clergy of any other diocese. That is shown
in a more striking manner by the cardinals, who are the clergy of
the Roman diocese, whose bishop is the Pope himself, for they are
the pastors of Rome.
But there is this diiference between them and the clergy of other
dioceses. For while the clergy of all other dioceses only propose
the name of their candidate for the vacant see and he is confirm-
ed or rejected by the Pope, yet the elect of the cardinals for the
See of Rome becomes at once the Pope, and the anointed of God,
for there is no power or authority on earth above the Papacy which
can reject or confirm the choice of the cardinals. We find that
they always precede the other bishops of the world, even when
they are only simple priests or belong to the lower clergy. This
gave rise to much ill-feeling on the part of the Greeks, because the
cardinals of the Roman diocese ranked higher than their patriarch
bishop of Constantinople. * In every part of the world the Ro-
man clergy in all ages ranked higher than the clergy of any other
church. Following the same rule the pastors of the archdiocese
preceded in honor the pastors of the other dioceses of the prov-
inces. In many places the clergy of the great sees were called
cardinals. Thus we read that the clergy of Ravenna signed their
names as cardinals to the decrees of a council held there. * The
> Codinus, Offlc Mag. Eccl. Constantinople Ed. 1635. Essai Historic Sur les Arcliidac. Ed. 1851
par D. A. Grea. 2 concil. Raven, iu the year 998.
310 PROMINENCE OF THE ARCHDIOCESES.
bishops of the province of Cologne signed their names: ''with the
chapter and the prelates/" The archbishop of Narbon when
signing his name to the decrees wrote: "We the archbishop of
Narbon with the bishops present and our venerable chapter
&c.'" The same dignity may be seen in parts of history. *
Not only that, but we see the archdeacons and officials of the
metropolitan sees fulfilling very important functions in the dio-
ceses subject to their archbishops. Thus cardinal Jules, retained
at Rome, ordered the archdeacon, the president of the chapter
of his cathedral, to hold a council in his absence. That was in
1517, and all the bishops of his arehiepiscopal province attended.
The chapter of that same archdiocese held a council in 1573 dur-
ing the absence of their archbishop. Even to-day when the pow-
ers of the archbishops over their provinces liave been much restrict-
ed, because of modern facilities of reaching Rome, still while the
arehiepiscopal see is vacant, the clergy of the metropolitan diocese
have certain rights over the other dioceses of the province. For
it belongs to them to supply the absence of the archbishop by
guiding the clergy of any diocese while he is away, or when the
arehiepiscopal throne becomes vacant. History shows us some ex-
amples of that kind. In the year 1^43 the chapter of the diocese
of Canterbury, England, while the arehiepiscopal see was vacant, ex-
comniunicated the suffragan bishop of London. * While the arch-
diocese of Reims was vacant in 1271, the chapter of that cathedral
adjourned a council called by Milon bishop of Soissons. ' In 1290
the cliapter of the cathedral cluirch of Tours allowed the clergj'
of Angers to elect a pastor as bishop. They examined and confirmed
his election, and commanded the bishops of the province to assem-
ble and consecrate him a bishop. The chief of the chapter of the
archdiocese of Cashel in Ireland revoked the election of a bishop
carried out contrary to the laws of the church provided in such
cases. " We see the jilace of honor given to the metropolitan
clergy in the councils of the middle ages notably in the II. council
of Soissons and at Frioul &c. In our own country we see that
when a provincial council is held in any part of tlie United States,
the clergy of the archdiocese takes a more prominent part than
any of the clergy of the other dioceses, and the clergy of the arch-
diocese of Baltimore took a most prominent and active part in the
three plenary councils of the American church held there.
As the archbishops, primates and patriarchs are the branches and
copies of the Papacy, holding the place of the latter with regard
to the dioceses under them, so their dioceses bear the likeness of
and are the images of the diocese of Rome. Tims, because the
Bisiiop of Rome is by that very fact the Pope and head over the
universal churchy so the bishop of any of the archdioceses or patri-
archal sees becomes by his appointment to that dioceses a patriarch,
archbishop or primate, according to the rank of his see his spirit-
> Condi. Colon. In the year 1810. » Concll. Narbon- In the year 1374.
> Concil. Hispalean. 1512. Cfmcil. Colon. 1649 &c. * Lab. T. XI. ool. 601.
* Ibidem col. 1922. * Thomas. Diac. Eccl. Ireland. P. I. 111. c. X.
TOMB OF MARGARET OF AUSTRIA IN THE CATHEDRAL BRUNN.
312 ANCIENT PAPAL DELEGATIONS.
ual spouse. Whence these honors and dignities' are inherent in
the see. They are not personal as the cardinalate, nor do they
die at the death of the prelate, but they live in the person of his
successor. We see that in the diocese of Rome, Peter is not dead,
for he ever lives in the person of his Successors the Roman Pontiffs.
That is why the clergy of these metropolitan archdioceses and
patriarchal sees are honored above the bishops of common dioceses.
The reader will see at once that the archbishops, primates or
patriarchs do not receive any episcopal consecration, which makes
them in holy orders the superiors of bishops. For all bishops, even
the Popes, are by power of holy orders equal, and one is not above
the other in episcopal rank. It is in jurisdiction that the Pope is
over the whole world and the Bishop of bishops.
The archbishops, primates and patriarchs are above the other
bishops, because they partake in the jurisdiction of the Pope.
They have been called by the latter to partake in his primacy, to
represent him, and in his name to preside over the other bishops.
They are the copies of and the branches of the Papacy. As the
branches of a tree are the copies and images of the trunk, and re-
ceive all their sap and life from the trunk, so that they may in their
turn have branches growing out of them, so the patriarchs, prim-
ates and archbishops have other dioceses and other churches under
them, which they rule in the name of the Pope.
The best known of these ancient papal delegations of the early
church M'as the region or diocese of Illyricum, ruled by the arch-
bishops of Thessalonica. Popes SS. Damasus, Leo the Great and
Gelasius, one after the other appointed the archbishops of this city
their legates over the aforesaid country. Representing the Popes,
they appointed bishops; they decided disputes; they ended minor
matters, and they sent those of greater importance to Rome. '
They could in the name of the Pope call the bishops of their prov-
ince to meet in council. ' Each archbishop at his appointment
received from the Pope his appointment as the delegate of the
latter. '
In ancient Gaul, now France, the archbishop of Aries was the
papal delegate for all surrounding regions of southern France, till
because of abuses St. Leo revoked the authority given by his pre-
decessors. * In the same way we read that the bishops of Sens
and of Vienna were in former times the delegates of the Roman
Pontiffs. The latter appointed various bishops with metropolitan
jurisdiction without regard to the sees they occupied. Such was
St. Syagrius bishop of Autun under Gregory the Great. Such was
Gregory VII. before his election to the Papal Chair. Such were
also St. Bernard of Clairveaux, St. Boniface archbishop of Germany
and many bishops and archbishops of France and of Germany under
Charlemagne and his successors. In England the archbishops of
Canterbury often bore the honors of an apostolate delegate. St.
' S hm Epist. V. ad Metrop. Illyricum n. 4, 0. et Epist. VI. ad Anas. Tbes. n. 4, &.
' Supra, n. 4. > Ibidem n. lU. * Ibldenf Epist. z.
REPRESENTING THE POPE. 313
Patrick was during the latter part of his life the papal delegate
for Ireland. In Spain the archbishops of Toledo and of Seville
were often appointed to that honor."'
The bishops and dioceses of the north of Africa were subject to
the archbishop of Carthage, so celebrated for being the see of St.
Oyprian. History tells us how close and intimate was the union
of that see with Rome. The writings of St. Cyprian show the
honor with which he held the Roman Pontiff. Carthage was for
many centuries the seat of a simple archbishop, till in the days of
SS. Leo IX. and of Gregory VII. the churches of Carthage and
of Africa were totally destroyed by the oppression and tyranny of
the barbarians and Mohammedans. The meetings of the bishops
of the north of Africa in those days always took place under the
presidency of the archbishops of Carthage, who represented the
Pope in the midst of and as chairman of the bishops of Africa
assembled in council. When the archbishop was absent the common
or cation law provided that his place sliould be tilled by the
dean of the episcopacy, that is by the oldest or Senior bish-
op. For that reason the Popes did not appoint any delegate in
the north of Africa, as they were well represented there by the pa-
triarch of Alexandria and by the archbishop of Carthage, till the
flourishing churchesof Africa weredestroyed by the Mohammedans.
At an early age the vast regions of Syria, of Asia Minor, of Greece
and of southern Europe were divided into provinces then called
dioceses. Over each presided an archbishop, as the delegate of
the Roman Pontiff, while in each city of these countries sat a bish-
op. There were often no archiepiscopal sees like they are now,
for the delegation was purely personal and died with the one so
honored. That was the way the Popes of the early ages exercised
their powers over far distant countries. Besides they limited the
power of these delegates to certain specified acts, which could be
revoked by the Pope at any time. The ecclesiastical laws did not
regulate these delegates of the Roman See. Being delegates of
the Popes, the latter at their appointment laid down their duties.
The honor was purely personal, and was not attached to the epis-
copal sees they ruled. Thus, although we see that many of the
ancient sees in the early church were honored with bishops, who
became one after the other the delegates of the Popes, yet the
delegation was not attached to the see itself as the archiepiscopal
and patriarchal dignities are now attached to metropolitan cities
in a lasting and stable manner.
At first these papal delegations were nearly always given to
the bishops of certain dioceses, as to the metropolitans of Aries, of
Thessalonica, &c. But in Spain, in France and in other countries
the honor was conferred on bishops of diverse dioceses, because of
the personal merits of the bishops of these ancient sees, who in
many cases were great saints and men of God. But little by
' St. Hormisda Epist. xvl. ad Salust. Spalen. ap Lab. T. IV. col. 1469. Id. Epist. xxiv. ad Joan.
Tarracon. col. 1466.
314 THE PRIMATES.
little, the custom of conferring it on the bishops of certain flour-
ishing cities gave them a pre-eminence among their brethren of
the episcopac}' of the whole nation, and that gave rise to their
permanency in the nation. From that they were called the primates
and their episcopal sees became the primatial sees. Thus the chief
sees of Europe, as Armagh in Ireland, Canterbury in England,
Bourges, Paris, Lyons and Aquitaine in France, Milan in Italy
with Seville and Toledo in Spain occupied the first rank in
Europe, like the great patriarchal see of Antioch, Constantinople,
and Alexandria in Asia and Africa, But it was in appearance
only, as Rome alone could equal or be really above the great
sees of antiquity. This St. Gregory meant when he wrote: " The
patriarchs or primates, hold the same poAver, although they are
of different names." '
In the middle ages there were many misunderstandings regard-
ing the primacies. Some bishops claimed the honor, because they
occupied the sees of the former delegates of the Roman Pontiffs.
For that reason Hincmar claimed that all the archbishops, who
were subject direct to the Pope became by that primates. A
number bore the honor only. Thus, when there was a dispute
between the archbishops of Armagh and Dublin regarding the
primacy of Ireland, the Pope solved the difficulty by giving the
title of primate of all Ireland to the former and the title of pri-
mate of Ireland to the latter.
The primates, being the chief bishops of a country,- and repre-
senting the Pope himself, the Popes alone can appoint them to
that honor. Thus we read that Popes Nicholas I. and Alexander
III. recognized the primacy of the bishops of Bourges over the
churches of Aquitaine; IJrban that of Narbonne over Aix,
that of Lyons over the provinces of Tours of Rouen," and St. Greg-
ory VI. over Sens. This was the custom of the West. In the
East, before the destruction of the Greek empire, the patriarchal
sees mentioned before received from various Popes the care of the
regions near their cities. They were the direct delegates of the
Supreme Pontiffs. In the expressive Greek language, which from
the conquest of Alexander, 400 years before Christ, prevailed in
these eastern countries, these delegates of the Holy See were
called katholikoi, that is universal delegates. Thus tlie regions
of upper Asia depended on the papal delegate archbishop of Seleu-
cia, the vicar of the patriarch of Antioch. The Etheopians were
ruled by a vicar of the patriarch of Alexandria. The churches of
Armenia were subject to a katholikos, who belonged to the arch-
diocese of Cesarea.
Tiiese in their turn gave rise to the patriarchs of the various
oriental rites which we see to-day in the East. The patriarch of
the Chaldeans represents the old katholikos of Seleucia. The pa-
triarch of the Maronites represents the papal delegate of that na-
tion. So it is with the catholics and united Armenians, the Syr-
" Pat. Lab. T. cxivlll. col. rm. » St. GreRory VM. L. vl. EpUt. 34 and 85.
THE FIRST BISHOPS OF THE UNITED STATES. 315
ians, the Abyssinians, the Copts, &c. ; they are all the disciples of tlie
ancient catholics of these countries of the East, where thecliurch
so flourished, before the political revolutions divided them from
Eome, the centre of unity and of faith. This rapid sketch will
give the key to many historic facts of history, which the ordinary
reader cannot understand. Thus it appears that in ancient times
any archbishop, primate or patriarch could appoint and consecrate
a bishop, divide a diocese, and perform many acts now i-eserved
to the Pope. They could do this because they were the delegates
of the Roman Pontiffs for these functions, because travelling and
communications with Eome were so difficult in those times, that
Popes had to appoint bishops to represent them in these dis-
tant regions.
Coming back to our own country we will now better understand
the nature of the titles of the bishops of this country. The first
bishops appointed in tliis country were the bishops of Quebec,
the bishop of which city was made a V^icar Apostolic by
the appointment of Francis de Laval in 1674. His jurisdiction
then extended over all Canada and the French possessions of the
Mississippi valley to the Eocky Mountains. The see of Quebec is
therefore the first diocese of that country.
In the United States the few and scattered catholics living with-
in our boundaries before the revolutionary war were subject to the
vicar apostolic of Ijondon. This arrangement remained till 1789,
when at the request of the clergy and by the votes of the priests, Eev.
John Carroll, cousin of Chas. Carroll of Carrolltown, one of the
signers of the Declaration of Independence, and himself a personal
friend of Washington, became the first bishop of Baltimore. His
diocese was then the whole United States. In 1808 the church had
so increased that Baltimore became an archdiocese, and New York
and Philadelphia, Boston and Bardstown, became the seats of bish-
ops. New York was erected into an archdiocese in 1850, having
subject to its archbishop all the New England states, with the
states of New York and New Jersey. In 1875 Boston became an
archdiocese, having as suffragans the New England states, leaving
to the archdiocese of New York the two states of New York and
New Jersey. Thus all the dioceses of these two states form the
ecclesiastical province of New York, and their bishops are the suf-
fragans of its archbishop, who presides over them in councils and
in meetings of this kind. But when the bishops of the whole
country meet in council, the archbishop of Baltimore usually pre-
sides over them, because he is the bishop of the oldest diocese.
Three plenary councils of the whole church have been held in Bal-
timore, and the prelates of this archdiocese presided over them as
the delegates of the Pope. There they enacted laws for the whole
country. From these customs the archbishops of Baltimore have
been called the primates of the United States, without really hav-
ing the title or the authority of a primate.
Pope St. Leo says, that in his time the great rule of the church
316 ANTIQUITY OF PATEIARCHS. '
was to give to each province and nation: "The form or image of
Peter," by the union of all bishops and churches under the head-
ship of one archbishop, primate or patriarch representing the.
Pope. * That was the universal custom in every age and country
back even to the time of the apostles. We trace it back, till we
find it lost in the silence of the apostolic times. No Pope or coun-
cil established then that ancient office. The most ancient councils
speak of them as being already ancient in their days. The council
of Antioch says: "It was the rule of the fathers from the begin-
ning. '" It may be seen in the Apostolic Constitutions.' The
council of Laodecia speaks of archbishops over bishops. The writ-
ings of the fathers are filled with texts, which sliow that some
bishops were over other bishops in their time. These bishops may
be called by different names, but it only shows that they were known
in the church at the time these fathers lived.
The word patriarch from the Greek meaning a prince of fathers,
in the first ages signified those bishops, who had authority over
others bishops. The bishops who occupied the old apostolic sees
were mostly known by that name. The bishojjs of these venerable
sees ruled not only bishops, but also primates and archbishops.
The most ancient patriarchal sees were Rome, Alexandria and
Antioch, the sees of Peter. Later the cities of Jerusalem and
Constantinople became the seats of patriarchs. Some times arch-
bishops were called patriarchs. In one council the bishop of Lyons
is called a patriarch, and often the Arian heretical bishops were
called by the same name. The names pope, patriarch, primate,
archbishop &c., are sometimes used in a misleading way in the early
church, so that men not well versed in ecclesiastical lore, make many
mistakes by confounding the names with their offices.
The first universal council of all the bishops of the church since
the days of the apostles met at Nice in the year 325. At that
time there were archbishops over other bisliops, and the office was
even then old in the church. The fathers of this council decreed:
" Let the old customs be kept, which are in Egypt, Lybia and Pen-
tapolis, that the bishops of Alexandria should have power over the
others, similar to the Bishop of Rome, for this is customary. In
the same way and in Antioch and in the other provinces, let the
privileges of these churches be guarded, as was clone in antiquity."*
" Because custom and the ancient tradition thus holds, that he who
sits bishop in JEVm " (the pagan name for Jerusalem after its
destruction and rebuilding by the Romans,) " let him be honored,
and the consequence of this honor, let the dignity of his Metropolis
be guarded." ' Here we see that the authority of these three great
patriarchal dioceses according to the very words of the first great
council of the whole church, extended over all the other bishops of
the surrounding nations. That is the real nature of the power of
a patriarch in the church, although the name itself is not given
> Senno Iv. * Concll. AnUocb in the year 341 Lab. T. U. col. 666. * N. 38.
* ConcU. Nicaenl Can. G. * Coacil. Nlcaeni Can. 7.
WHAT THE COUNCIL OF NICE SATS. 317
"by the fathers of the council of Nice. But while they do not
say that the bishop of Jerusalem has the same authority as the
bishops of Aiitioch and Alexandria, but the honor only, they show
in striking words the authority of these two sees which Peter found-
ed before going to Eome. Yet the see of Jerusalem was probably
established by Christ himself as some say when on the day of his
ascension he gave the church at Jerusalem to St. James, as tradi-
tion says. Yet according to the great council, the sees of Peter
have full authority over dioceses and nations, while the see found-
ed by Christ himself or by the apostles at Jerusalem has only an
honorary title or the dignity of the patriarchate without the power,
a wonderful testimony of Peter's sees established in his disciples
Sts. Mark, Evodius and Ignatius.
The council of Nice mentions not the see of Constantinople, be-
-cause a few years before the emperor Constantino had moved the
seat of the Roman empire to the little city of Byzantium, till then
subject to the archbishop of Heraclea, which he called Con-
stantinople after himself. In the fourth century the bishops of
Constantinople made themselves patriarchs, which the Popes toler-
ated, but they did not give them the first place till the thirteenth
century. In the ancient church then only the three sees of
Peter, Eome, Alexandria, and Antioch were called patriarchal
churches.'
Later the Popes erected the sees of Jerusalem and Constanti-
nople to the honor of the patriarchate, because at the former city
Christ lived and died, and they conferred the honor on the imperial
city, that they might conciliate the favors of the Roman emperors,
jealous of the supreme power of the Bishops of Rome. That took
jilace in the thirteenth century. Before this, the imperial city
of Constantinople endeavored to obtain the second place after
Rome, and to rank her archbishop over the patriarchs of Alexandria
and Antioch, but the Roman Pontiffs rejected the canons formed
for that purpose. Only twenty canons of the council of Nice now
remain, but the learned tell us that they passed other canons which
have been lost. The canons decreeing that Easter must be cele-
brated on Sunday, that men twice married must not be ordained,
that there must not be two bishops of the same see, the canons
relating to the scriptures, that clergymen saying Mass must be
fasting, that appeals must be to the Bishop of Rome, the decree
relating to the examination of synods, the addition of the ^' As it
was in the beginning '^ &c,, after the "Glory be to the Father"
&c., all these canons mentioned by later writers are nowhere now
to be found. Like so many other precious monuments of antiquity
they h^.ve perished.
In 451 a council was called at Chalcedon over which presided
Pascasinus, Lucentius and Boniface, legates of the Pope, who had
in the meantime died, and when in the decree of this council was
read in the council erecting Constantinople into a " new Rome, "
• Cardinal Petra'T. iv. ad Const. 17 Eug. Iv. sec. ill. n. 4.
318 CASES AGAINST BISHOPS.
next to the *'old Rome of Pqter/' the legates of the Pope refused
to confirm the decree formulated by the one hundred and fifty as-
sembled bishops, as being contrary to the council of Nice, stating^
that: " The Apostolic Throne of the Papacy had commanded them
to refer it to The Apostolic Bishop and prince of the whole church."
Thus they vetoed the action of the bishops, who the day before
while the legates were absent had passed this decree placing Con-
stantinople over the apostolic sees of Alexandria and of Antioch.
'* In the course of time Constantinople and Jerusalem became pa-
triarchal sees, because they were not so from the beginning" says-
the council of Florence.' Pope Nicholas in 858 said that only the
sees established by the apostles were the seats of patriarchs, but
that Constantinople or Jerusalem had not the same patriarchal pow-
er as Alexandria and Antioch established by Sts. Mark and Peter,
that the council of Nice did not name the bishop of Jerusalem,
because the true Jerusalem is heaven, of Avhich Christ our Lord is-
the real Bishop. But they called him bishop of ^Elia, the city
built on the ruins of Jerusalem by Adrian, after the holy city had
been destroyed by the Romans, as foretold by our Lord. '
The council of Nice commanded the metropolitans or archbish-
ops to meet in council under their patriarch once each year, and
forbade them to proceed criminally against any bishop without the
consent of the patriarch. The council of Chaledon gave to the
archbishop of Constantinople the privilege of sitting in judgment
in the controversies between bishops and archbishops within his
province or subject to him. ' In the year 1215 the Lateran coun-
cil granted the long desired honor to Constantinople, that of being
the first metropolitan see after Rome, next coming Alexandria,
then Antioch and Jerusalem. The patriarch of Constantinople
could sit in cases of appeal coming from all provinces of the
Greek empire before the cases would go to Rome. * In these times
many archbishops and bishops were called patriarchs, without hav-
ing any authority attached to their titles.
The authority of the patriarchs is given in the common or canon
law of the church. Pope Nicholas the I. wrote to Archbishop
Rodolph that all cases of appeal in the dioceses of the bishops, arch-
bishops and primates come before them, before coming to the last
court of appeal the Roman Curia. ' In the early church, criminal
cases against bishops often did not come before the patriarch, but
before a provincial synod of tlie bishops. But they could not
depose the bishops unless the Pope agreed, after hearing the
case on appeal, because the Pope is the Bishop of bishops, and
alone to him belongs to create or depose bishops. Cases against
archbishops first came before the patriarch, who called a council of
all the bishops and archbishops in his patriarcliate to hear and
{)ronounce on the charges. That was incorporated into the Roman
aw under the emperor Justinian. * But the metropolitan could
' Parte H. col. 22. » Lab. T. 8 ool. M.'i n. 92. » Can. 17.
* Coocil. Lat. iv. an. 1215 under Innocent HI. * Concil. Lat. Iv. cap. 5. ■ Novel. 128.
HISTOEIC NOTES. 319
not be deposed by that court, without the confirming voice of the
Bishop of Home. A patriarch always presided over national coun-
cils of all the bishops and archbishops in any country. ' But no
patriarch could call such a meeting without the consent of the
Pope. Julius I. condemned a council of this kind called at An-
tioch by the bishop of that city. In the council of Chalcedon
the papal legates Paschasianus and Lucentius, would not let
Dioscorns, patriarch of Alexandria sit with the other bishops, be-
cause without the consent of the Bishop of Rome, he had called
and held such a council, stating that either he should leave the
council or they would. ' Such councils then could neither be held,
nor the decrees published without the consent and approbation of
the Pope. In 1112 Primas, bishop of Lyons, called a council, but
some of the bishops refused to come, saying that he did so without
the consent of the Pope. ' Damiburtus. archbishop of Siens, Ivo,
bishop of Chartres, Walo, bishop of Paris and John, bishop of
Orleans wrote him refusing to attend the council, stating that
patriarchs and primates had not authority over bishops, except
what was given them by the common laws of the church, and that
no council could be held without the consent of the apostolic See.
As a sign of their authority, the cross must be carried before a
patriarch, except when they are in Rome, or when the Pope or a
legate of the Pope is present. This is a privilege granted to some
other prelates below patriarchs.
In finishing this historic research into the powers of the patri-
archs who sit on the apostolic sees, we might say that every on&
of these old sees established by the apostles have been overturned,
not only once but many times, since they were established by
the apostles. Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, Constantinople,
the great historic cities have fallen from their honors. They
were overrun by the Saracens, the Mohammedans, the Turks
&c.
The archbishop of the first diocese is called the primate. He
is over all the archbishops, bishops and churches of the country.
They are not really primates unless they have certain jurisdiction
or authority over the archbishops of the country. This was
stated by Pope Boniface I. in 418. After the Saracens were driven
from Spain, Urban II. in 1088 restored the primatial dignity to
the archbishop of Toledo, who by that obtained authority over the
archbishops, bishops and churches of Spain. At the same time he
made him the legate of the Holy See for this nation, with instruc-
tions to respect the privileges and rights of the church and of the
bishops given them by the common laws. The councils held at
Toledo, Spain became very celebrated, and many things there first
introduced became universal by the customs, or by the acts of the
Pope or by universal councils. The Pope appointed the archbishops
of Lyons the primate of that part of France. Later the archbishop
of Aries became the legate of the Pope over all France. But he
' Benedict xiv. De Synod. Dloces. 1. 1. c. i, n. 2. * Lab. Concll. T. 4. Act. i. col. 94.
320 THE POWERS OF PRIMATES.
was never the primate, for it was a personal power which did not
descend to his successors in the see.
Whence the patriarchal dignity is a power over primates, arch-
bishops, bishops and churches permanently affixed to the see. A
primate may be subject to a patriarch, while the latter is subject
only to the See of Rome. This was always the custom in the East,
while in the West many primates are directly subject to the Pope,
who in his own person has all the honors and dignities of every
grade both of orders and of jurisdiction. In the East there are the
primates of Ephesus, of Cesareaand of Heraclea, with archbishops
under them. In the early church they were called exarchs, from
the Greek meaning a chief or leader. The council of Chalcedon
says that when controversy rises between archbishops, the appeal
must be heard by the exarch of the province or before the patri-
archal throne of Constantinople, The primates were sometimes
called catholici, because of their partial universal authority. That
name was given them in the council of Nice. *
They were forbidden by this council to create archbishops where
there was a patriarch. Often the region over which they ruled
was called a diocese, from the Greek meaning the administration
of a house or of a province. The second council of Carthage for-
bade bishops to consecrate a bishop without consulting the primate
of the church in Africa. Some authors say that the primatial
sees were instituted by the apostles, but the more certain opinion
seems to say that they were erected by the Popes. Pius VI. sup-
pressed all those of France when the concordate with that country
was signed in 1801.
The primate has no authority over churches unless it is found
in the common law, as Nicholas I, wrote to archbishop Rodolph.
Appeals from the archbishop go before the primate. Such was
determined in the council of Chalcedon. ' The primate under
the direction of the Pope, may call a national council, and he us-
ually presides over the other bishops as chairman. * But they
cannot undertake episcopal visitations in the provinces of other
archbishops. When the II. council of Baltimore was called in
1884, by order of Leo XIII., the archbishop of Baltimore presid-
ed, as did his predecessors in the former national councils. The
primacy appears to have fallen into disuse in modern times. Thus
since Pius VI. suppressed all the provinces and dioceses of France
in 1801, there are no primatial sees in that country.
The word archbishop comes from the Greek and means the first
or chief bishop, the same as an archangel, archpriest, &c., are over
others in the hierarchies. In the early church they were called
metropolitans, that is bishops of the mother churches, the mean-
ing of the word in Greek. The bishops then of the chief cities
were called in the early churches metropolitans. They were first
called thus in the Greek empire. In the council of Chalcedon,
the bishop of Alexandria is called an archbishop. In the third
^ Tom. 11. col. 301. * Can. 9. et. 17. * Benedict xiv. de Synod, dioces. L. I. C. I, n. 2.
THE archbishop's POWERS. 321
council of Carthage the metropolitan is called: ''the prince of
priests, or the supreme priest." But in the church of Africa the
oldest consecrated bishop, presided over the council, and the office
was not fixed to any particular see. He was called the senior
bishop. The only exception was Carthage, to which the office of
metropolitan was permanently fixed, and her bishop was called
the primate.
The name metropolitan is much older than that of archbishop,
and seems to go back to the very days of the apostles. In our
day the words metropolitan and archbishop mean the very same,
that is the bishop, who by right attached to his see, presides over
the bishops of his province, and before whom comes the appeals
from the episcopal courts.
An archbishop then is a prelate who has authority over suffra-
gan bishops not having jurisdiction over other bishops. The
archiepiscopal office was instituted by Peter and his successors, for
we find that the archiepiscopal office existed long before the first
general council of Nice held in 325. The archbishop takes an active
part in the election of the bishoiDS of his province, and he usually
consecrated them, while formerly he even ordained clergy of the
dioceses of the bishops under him. But in the East he could not
consecrate any bishop without the consent of the patriarch. He
presided over the bishops of his province assembled in council, and
there passed judgment on important matters appealed from
these dioceses of his j^rovince. But he cannot depdfee a bishop,
for he can only take testimony and obtain information, which
will be later laid before Rome. The council of Trent decreed
that important episcopal cases must be passed on only by the
Holy See. In former times the archbishop could undertake epis-
copal visitations in the dioceses of their suffragan bishops, but
they do not do so now, except by orders of Rome when the state
of religion demands it.
The archbishop can do notliing in the diocese of his suffragan
bishops except what the common law says. Being a branch of
the Holy See, the archbishop must report his actions and judg-
ments in the dioceses of his province. ' The archbishop takes
charge of matters of appeal from the dioceses of his province, and
passes judgment for or against the appellant according to the tes-
timony passed on by the bishop's court. Although in the early
ages of the church, archbishops, not being able to inform Rome,
could elect and consecrate bishops in their provinces, in modern
times, because it is so easy to write to the Holy See, the Pope re-
serves to himself the election and consecration of bishops.
Neither can archbishops sit in judgment in serious episcopal cases,
that being reserved to the Holy Father, while matters of small
importance come before provincial councils. *
It is disputed whether the archbishop is the judge in civil cases
between bishops and their subjects, as the council of Trent says
' Innocent III. 9. Duo simul. ^ Trld. Concil. Ses. 24. C. 5.
323 APPEALS TO THE ARCHBISHOP.
nothing about such cases, stating only that small cases should be
tried in a provincial council and important ones must go before
Rome. When the archbishop calls the bishops of his province to
meet in council, they are obliged to attend. The archbishop can-
not pass judgment on subjects of the dioceses in his province, ex-
cept on appeal after the episcopal court has given its sentence.
Neither can he take any action while such cases are pending, nor
receive any appeal, except when the sentence of the bishop's final
court would not justify the complainant. But if the case be not
decided within two years, the case may come before the metropoli-
tan court. ' The archbishop therefore is the court of appeal for
all the members of the dioceses in his province, when the appeal
is regularly made within ten days. If a vicar general abuses his
office, the archbishop can correct him. Where no cathedral
chapter exists, when the episcopal see becomes vacant, the arch-
bishop has jurisdiction and can appoint an administrator of the
vacant see. In former times the archbishop could officially visit
the dioceses and parishes within the limits of his province, but
the council of Trent made a law, stating that could be done only
for a cause heard in a provincial council. But this hardly ever
takes place now. The archbishop can use the pallium and have
the cross carried before him in all parts of his province.
The pallium is an ornament of the Popes in the form of a scarp,
made of the wool of the lambs kept by the sisters of St. Agnes at
Rome, and sent by the Pope to patriarchs, primates and archbish-
ops, after being laid on the tomb of St. Peter under the main al-
tar of St. Peter's church. It is sent to them as a sign of their
authority over other bishops as branches of the Papacy, for tliey
partake in the power of Peter. Some say that the Roman emper-
ors used to give a pallium to the Bishops of Rome in ancient
times In 336 Pope St. Mark conferred the pallium on the bish-
op of Ostia, and from that time he wears it on pontifical ceremonies.
The moment a bishop receives the oflficial notification of his elec-
tion by the Pope, he can exercise episcopal jurisdiction in his dio-
cese even before his consecration. But before he receives the
pallium an archbishop cannot call a council, bless the chrism,
dedicate a church, or ordain the clergy, because the fulness of his
power comes with the reception of the pallium. Within three
months the new archbishop must ask for the pallium. If he be
at Rome, the Pope himself imposes the vestment on his shoulders,
otherwise the Holy Father appoints a cardinal, an archbishop or
bishop to place it in his name.
The Pope alone wears the pallium everywhere every day, for to
him descends the fulness of Peter's power over bishops, while
archbishops wear it only in their own church or province, when
celebrating Mass on certain great feast days. He cannot wear it
in another province without the consent of the archbishop of that
province, for he has no jurisdiction outside of his own province.
> Ooncil. Trld. Ses. 24. Cap. 20.
|HE other bishops are like pastors within thenniversal church,
of which the Pope is their bishop, while the dioceses they
rule may be likened to great parishes within the church uni-
versal. Therefore we must consider the whole church as a
great diocese of which Christ is the Bishop, and the Pope his Vicar
General with full jurisdiction, wherein the bishops are subject to the
rule and authority of the Vicar of Christ. In the same way the
church universal spreads everywhere, but we cannot tell who belong
to it for, " man looketh on the outside while God alone beholdeth
the heart," and he only can tell who is in the state of grace belong-
ing to the universal church. But like the Son of God becoming in-
carnate and visible as a man, the church becomes individualized
and visible in the Roman diocese.
To him alone it belongs to call a meeting of all the bishops of the
church, and they meet under the presidency of their chairman as
pastors of the great diocese of the universal church.
Not only when assembled in council, but even when scattered all
383
INTERIOR OF THE CATHEDRAL, SIENNNA, ITALY.
THE BISHOPS AND THE POPE. 325
over the whole world in their own dioceses, the bishops aid the
Pontiff in his government of the universal church. Both united
in council and scattered in their dioceses, they are completely
under the authority and headship of their- bishop the Pope, sub-
ject to the laws of the Papacy made for their guidance. For the
Son coming forth from the Father in heaven, acts not in any ir-
regular way, but he is always subject to the laws eternal of the
divine filiation. In that he is under the authority of the eternal
Father, because he is begotten of the Father in whose divine
nature he partakes. So all the bishops of the world are begotten
of, and come forth in a spiritual manner from their Father the
Pope, and they are one with him, as the Son is one with the
Father, and the church is one and has only one divine Priest-
hood. Ill the Deity, the Son is equal to the Father and has
only one divine nature with him, but the Father has his father-
hood and the Son has his sonship and in these they differ. So in
holy orders the bishops are one with the Pope, for there is but
one eternal Priesthood, that of Christ, and in holy orders the
bishops are the equals of the Pope, for all bishops have received
the fulness of the Priesthood of Christ, as Christ receives the
fulness of his Divinity from his Father. But the bishops have
not the fatlierhood of the Pope over the whole church, but only
that of holy orders in their own dioceses.
We see therefore that there is a continual interchange of
power, of aid and of help between the bishops of the church and
their earthly head, which resembles the communication of nature
and of action taking place between the august Persons of the
Trinity. The bishops of the world reflect the infallible teaching
and the sanctifying action of the Pope. They partake in his
supreme government over the members of their own diocese,
because they partake with him in the government of the flocks
given to their care. The bishops put in force the common or
canon laws of the church, which come from the Papacy. They
can make rules and regulations for the particular good of their
own people. Thus each diocese is like a Sovereign State which
has the regulation of its internal affairs in the most perfect
manner, yet forming a part of the general Government of the
church.
In that way many customs rise in different parts of the world,
and by the silent consent of the Popes they continue, till at last
they become universal laws in the church. For custom makes
law as well as legislatures. In this way rose the custom of reciting
the Roman Breviary in the apostolic ages, the fasting from meat on
Fridays, because the pagans dedicated Friday to the impure wor-
ship of Venus, goddess of impurity, and because Christ died on
that day. In the same way rose ' the custom of calling three
times the names of parties about to be married and numerous
other customs. When the Sovereign Pontiff confirms these local
' la England.
326 EXTRAORDINARY POWER OF BISHOPS.
customs, when he extends them to the whole church, it is the same
as the approval of the canons of a council. They then become the
law for the whole church. The same may be said relating to the
canonization of the Saints. Many saints of the early church were
held as such by the people and bishops of one or more dioceses.
The Pope tolerated that till it spread to the whole church. The
Saints of the Roman Missal were considered as holy by the pas-
tors and people of the Roman diocese, without any official action
on the part of the authorites of the church. In all this we see
the life of the church ever acting, producing from witliiii, that
life is the Holy Spirit flowing from the Head Christ, down on the
members and rising again from the members to the head visible,
the Pope.
The bishops not only in council when assembled are united in-
to their chief the Sovereign Pontiff, but also when scattered into
all parts of the world. Then they keep order, preach the Gospel,
and upliold the discipline of the church in the diocese over which
the Holy Ghost has placed them to " rule the church of God." '
At the preaching of the apostles the whole world lay before their
feet, ripe for the harvest of the Lord. They went first as mis-
sionary bishops where they wished to found cliurches. Later they
became the titular bishops of different dioceses. In this we see
that the church universal existed before any particular church or
diocese or parish. It follows that the church universal is not de-
prived of ite authority over souls by the establishment of dioceses,
no more than the authority of the bishop in his diocese is taken
away by the erection of parishes. In the hierarchy of the church
universal, the Pope is the Pastor of all men, for he is the Vicar
of Christ who died for all mankind. But because they are the
pastors of the universal church, the bishops take part in its gov-
ernment, as in a much inferior way the pastors of the diocese
take part with the bishop in the government of the diocese. In
this the bishops have a power in the universal church, which ex-
tends beyond the limits of their diocese, as the pastors may have
the faculties of administering the sacraments in all parts of the
diocese.
Thus we see in history that the bishops took charge of souls
outside their diocese. They often become the titular bishops of
dioceses where the church has been overturned by wars and the in-
cursions of the infidels. They are often appointed to dioceses to
rule, not in their own names, but as apostolic vicars of the Pope.
But all this is absolutely under the direction of the Pope, for he
is the Vicar of him who died for all. In a similar way the pas-
tors of the diocese rule their people in union with their bishop,
because he is for the pastors what the Pope is for the bishops.
This is called the extraordinary ministration of the Gospel. For
when the diocese or the parish is complete, and canon law in its
full extent has been introduced, then tne church is in its normal
> Acts u. 28.
THE ONLY IMMOETAL DIOCESE. 327
or ordinary state. In that case the canon law regulates every
action of the clergy, and nothing is left to the arbitary action of
the ministers of the church. In this case every act of priest or
of bishop has been laid down and regulated by the canon law, and
they must follow the law in every case or be punished. Then
the human element in the church is curbed by the divine element,
the law which keeps the human passion under, and the oppression of
any of Christ's sheep is impossible, because they are protected by
the wise enactments and laws of the church. Then the particular
church, the diocese, and the imperfect church the parish, flourish
in every land, and the church universal rejoices in the health and
the prosperity of her daughters, the dioceses and parishes. On
the contrary the phurch universal suffers when her children suf-
fer or become weak members, when they die by persecution or by
the loss of faith.
From this we learn that the particular churches the dioceses
are not immortal. For being great moral and religious persons
they are subject to destruction and to death. For history tells us
of the former flourishing dioceses of Palestine, of Egypt, of Ara-
bia, of Asia Minor and of many other famous and historic churches
in these countries now oveiTun by infidels. They now live only
in the persons of their titular bishops. But as dioceses they have
been destroyed for the sins of their people as was said by Jesus of
the churches of Asia. ' The church universal alone is immortal
because it is the bride of the lamb. The Roman Church alone
has withstood the rage of the demon, for of her Christ foretold:
" Thou art Peter and upon this rock I will build my church and
the gates of hell shall not prevail against her." "''
Because it is the seat of the Papacy, the Vicar of Christ is its
Bishop. To him belongs all souls redeemed. For that reason
the Chair of Peter is called the Apostolic chair. For to the
apostles under Peter, Christ gave power to preach to the Jews
and pagans before their conversion. Whence all missions are
directly under the power of the Pope. When by any misfortune
one of the dioceses ceases to exist, the Apostolic authority again
assumes full power over the remaining christians in that diocese.
For when they have no bishop of their own, they become more
especially the people of Christ, and his Vicar takes charge of them.
The Propaganda looks after them. For we see that at the begin-
ning of the church, the apostles and their disciples went forth as
teachers of the universal church, according to those words of our
Lord. '* Going forth therefore teach ye all nations." That was
their universal mission. He said that only to the apostolic college.
He did not want to make them bishops of any particular diocese,
because there were no dioceses till they had formed them by their
preaching. That universal power of the apostolate belonging to
all the apostles and which made them universal missionary bishops
is still in the church, for he continued: " behold I am with you
» Apoc. 1. il, lit. 2 Matt. xvi. 19. 20.
328 PERSONAL POWERS OF EACH APOSTLE.
all days even to the consummation of the world." ' Acting on these
words of our Lord, they went forth to the uttermost ends of the
earth for " their sound went fortli unto all the earth."" When
they had founded churches, then they or their disciples became
the titular bishops of these newly formed churches. Thus we see
that St. Paul left his disciple Titus at Crete and he consecrated
his other disciple Timothy as bishop of Ephesus. St. Peter sent
St. Mark to Alexandria and left his friend St. Evodius at Antioch.
But things could not continue always in that \ ay. For soon
one bishop might encroach on the limits of another, and confu-
sion and disputes would soon undo all the good they had achieved.
For that reason they were from the beginning subject to St. Peter,
to whom alone was given supreme control and an unlimited
apostolate to convert the entire world. St. Cyprian calls Peter
'' The Origin of the apostolate."^ And Innocent says of him:
**By whom in Christ the apostolate and the episcopate received
their origin." * For " the keys of the kingdom of heaven which
were to be given to the others, Peter alone received them."^
For that reason Peter chose one of the disciples to be an apostle
in the place of Judas, ' and as St. Clirysostom says: " With his
power alone he could elect and consecrate him " ' although out of
regard for the other apostles he called them to the council.
The priest or the assistant of the pastor is not necessary for
the parish. A vicar general is not so required that the diocese
cannot get along without him, because the parish or the diocese
are not perfect churches. But the universal church, being per-
fect, it could not exist without the Bishop of Rome, the Vicar of
Christ. " For in raising blessed Peter over the other apostles,
in him he raised an everlasting principle and visible foundation,
upon whose strength he might raise an eternal temple, that by the
strength of his faith, the head of the church might rise to the
heavens. "® " Therefore we teach and we declare, that by the ac-
tion of the Lord Peter has obtained a principle of ordinary power
over all other churches. " *
Each apostle received a personal confirmation in grace and in
holiness and they were at the same time wonderfully united to their
chief, St. Peter, for they heard his commission given direct by
their Master. They acted with more freedom than any of their
successors, the bishops who had not received their commission from
Christ himself, but from Peter, the head of the church. The apostles
were bounded by no limits, for they were first on the field,
when there was no church, .no diocese, no spiritual organization.
Only the universal church then appeared in their pei-sons, and it
was freed from abuses and from the dangers of older dioceses, and
edified by the personal holiness, light and grace of the apostles.
Converts at that time had great faith, and the Holy Spirit worked
• Matt, xxvlll. 19. " Psalm xvlU. 6. * St. Cyprian Eplst xlv. ad Cornel.
■• St. Innocent I, Eptet. II. ad. Vlctric. • St. Uptatus MUev. con. Farm. I. 7.
• Aci«. 1. ^ St. Chryst. In Acts Apoet. Horn. II.
• Council Vat. Const. Pastor £temus. * Vatican Council Ibidem Council Lateran IV.
HOW THE APOSTLES FIRST PREACHED. 329
wonderful miracles to attract the nations to the Gospel. Thus
we read of wonderful things done by the apostles. Even they
raised the dead, cured all kinds of diseases and worked the most
wonderful works. Eusebius, one of the earliest christian historians
tells us that, " Besides these, at the same time flourished among
the disciples of the apostles, men of the highest merits. For
these disciples of such great and wonderful men were evidently
divine. When the apostles laid the foundations of the church in
different places, they added to the edifice, by the preaching of the
Gospel, by sowing the seed of the heavenly teachings, and scat-
tering it all over the earth Then having left their own country,
they went forth to fulfil the duty of evangelists, for those who
have not heard desired to know Christ, and to have the books of
the Holy Gospel given to them. And after these had laid the
foundations of the faith in the most remote places, they ordained
other pastors, satisfied to give to them the care of the new planta-
tion, that they, with the help of God, might hurry to new regions"
&c. ' By this we see that the apostles were mostly m issionary bish-
ops of the universal church , without being attached to any particular
church, and that when they converted any people, they estab-
lished pastors over them, and then hurried away to new con-
quests of Souls for Christ.
Thus we read that St. Peter and the first Popes sent legates to
the pagan nations to convert them to the GospeL St. Peter him-
self sent the first bishops to Spain soon after Sts. Paul and James
began to preach the Gospel to that nation. Sts. Peter and Clement
sent to Paris St. Dennis, the Greek who at the time of the
crucifixion said: "Either the Lord of the universe is dying or the
universe is dissolving. " St. Dennis preached on the banks of the
Seine at the little city of Leutitia, now Paris. " The monks came
to Vienna from Rome. The first bishops of France came from
the East sent by Eome to that nation. They were Trophimus,
Paulus, Martialis, Gratianus, St. Saturnenus, Valerius, &c.,
sent to that nation by St. Peter himself, because they were his
companions in his work at Rome. * St, Boniface was sent to
preach to the Germans, St. Augustine to the English, St. Patrick
to the Irish, all sent by the Popes, because from Rome and
from the Chair of Peter the whole of Europe received its civiliz-
ation, christian faith and teachings.
But not all of these apostolic men received full power to be the
legates and the representatives of the Papacy. For many of them
were only simple bishops, or priests, preaching the Gospel and
establishing missions among the pagans of Europe. When their
labors became fruitful, when congregations increased, parishes
^nd dioceses w^ere formed out of the large territory. In time the
full machinery of the church took the place of the imperfect mis-
-sionary organization which they founded. We see that taking
* Eusebliis Hist. Eccl. L. lU. C. 37. 2 Cathedrals of the World, Notre Dame Church, Paris.
* Vet. MS. Arelat. ap. Falon. Monum. Ined. T. li. p. 33.
330 MISSIONAKY BISHOPS.
place under our eyes to-day in this country, and in all missionary
countries of the world. Missions are first established, they become
more and more perfected, till at last the complete organization of
the parish and diocese takes the place of the mission. In the first
ages the apostles went forth with the complete authority of Christ
to do what they could to save souls. They had from Peter the
full authority to do the best they could, and the Head of the
church left things rather to their judgment. In that age travel-
ling was difficult, and because of the persecutions they could but
seldom see their chief, the Roman Pontiff.
To-day priests and bishops go forth into Asia, Africa and every-
where among the pagans or the heretics, and they are either apos-
tolic delegates, that is, they represent the Pope, or they are mis-
sionary priests, bishops, vicars of the Pope, representatives of the
Eoman Pontiff, with the titles of old dioceses now in the hands of
the Turks. When by their labors people come to hear them,
and converts are numerous, they form a diocese. Then they
become the bishops of the place, and the laws and organization of
dioceses obtain full force. It was necessary for them at first to
go out as missionaries, because they must be free from the com-
mon laws binding bishops and pastors to reside in their dioceses
and parishes, to consecrate the holy oils during holy weeks with
many clergymen, besides binding them to numerous other epis-
copal duties which regular bishops are required to perform, where
the common law of the church is in full force, which could not be
carried out in a missionary country.
After the diocese has been established and when by some misfor-
tune of war, of persecution, of infidelity, the organization of the
church has perished, then the universal church throws her pro-
tecting powers over her unhappy daughter, the unfortunate peo-
ple look to Rome to help them in their spiritual wants. Thus in
the IV. century St. Eusebius went from place to place in the East,
preaching and ordaining priests for the churches destroyed by the
Arian heresy, which denied the divinity of Christ. When the
Huns, the Vandals, the Visigoths, and the other barbarians com-
ing down from the North-east of Europe, overunning the South,
destroying churches, and putting bishops and priests to death, the
neighboring bishops looked after the wants of the persecuted dio-
ceses, till regular pastors and bishops could be regularly ordained
and consecrated. When the church was persecuted by Henry
VIII. and by his illegitimate daughter Elizabeth, when bishops
and priests were put to death or driven out of England, the clergy
of France, of Belgium, and of other neighboring countries attend-
ed to the English people, till at the rising of the faith again in
England, an apostolic Legate at London was appointed by the
Holy See bishop of that city. The bishops of Ireland often at
that time administered to the people of the neighboring dioceses,
when their own pastors were put to death by the conquering Danes
or English.
HOW BISHOPS DIFFER FKOM THE APOSTLES. 331
By virtue of these laws one bishop can give letters to another
bishop to ordain one of his own clergymen. When one bishop is
absent, another can consecrate the holy oils for him or do any
other episcopal work in his diocese. But as the Sovereign Pon-
tiff is at all times the Vicar of Christ, who by redemption has com-
plete power over souls, he can ask a bishop to resign, appoint
an administrator to a vacant diocese, or do anything in any dio-
cese, which the bishop of the same can do, because he is the direct
pastor of the whole flock of Christ. '
But the interference of one bishop in another's diocese cannot
take place, except when the necessities of the case require.
Otherwiseone would interfere in the business of his episcopal broth-
er, and confusion would result. All these cases are regulated
by the canon law of thechuch. Therefore that universal power
of the bishops, by which they can go outside the limits of their
diocese to exercise episcopal functions, is rooted in episcopal or-
der, because they belong first to the universal church, which has
no boundaries. But only in extraordinary cases can they do so,
as when they become bishops of a certain place, there they live
and spend their days in working for the good of their own dio-
ceses. When bishops have the titles of dioceses among the infi-
dels, but work in another diocese, they are forbidden to exercise
their functions in their episcopal city, lest a contest regarding jur-
isdiction should arise. Thus one of the auxiliary bishops of this
country, or a titular archbishop of Petra, in Arabia, but who
would be a coadjutor of some archbishop in this country could
not enter the city of Petra, to there perform episcopal functions
if he were travelling there, because these regions are usually in the
care of apostolic vicars.
It is evident from what we said that the bishops are the pastors
of the universal church, and that they have ordinary jurisdiction.
But they are subject to the Roman Pontiff. They have not the
gifts of the apostolate as given to the apostles. For by reason of
their close relationship with our Lord, the apostles were universal
bishops in the church. He confirmed them in grace. They were
all infallible by a peculiar gift of the Holy Ghost. They could
perform miracles and speak all languages. These were given them
on Pentecost, because they wanted all these for the establishment
of the church at that time.* These personal gifts remained with
them till they had organized churches over all the nations of
antiquity, that they might command respect from their converts,
inspire reverence in their successors, and that by the weight of
their personality, they might keep the church together till the full
organization of the diocese was completed.
Even St. Paul preached till there was no place for him in the
countries divided up among the apostles: " But now having no
more place in these countries." ' We must then consider the kinds
of gifts given to the apostles, one of the personal gifts of mir-
1 Concll. Vatlcanum. ^ pjyg yi. Brev. Super. Nynclat. C. HI. Sec, 1. ^ Rom. xv. 23.
332 THE HEAD OF THE APOSTLES.
acles, confirmation in grace, the unlimited power of preaching,
infallibility and the gift of speaking all languages. But alone
the authority of preaching and of governing was to be handed
down to their successors in the episcopacy under the presidency
of Peter and of his successors. Suarez thinks that they received
only delegated authority, Peter only having the ordinary jurisdi-
tionem ' while Bellarmine thinks that the power of miracles and of
infallibility was given to each of the apostles which was to die with
them except in the case of Peter, who was to hand it down to his
successors in the See of Rome."
Christ gave full power to all of the apostles. Then when he as-
cended into heaven, he became invisible to human eyes, but he
remains for all time visible in the person of his Vicar in the
Roman See. The first Bishops of the church, the apostles, who
heard the Lord speak by his own mouth, now hear him speak by
the words of his Vicar on earth. Thus the bishops of the world
come forth from their father the Pope, as the Son of God comes
forth from his Father in heaven. In this, the workings of the
church are an image of the working of the Persons of the Holy
Trinity. When St. Paul was persecuting the church, the Lord
Jesus said to him: "Saul, Saul why persecutest thou me?"' The
church is one with Christ, and for that reason he asked why he was
persecuting him, not the members of the church. AVhen St. Paul
was instructed and ready for the ministry, he was baptized at
Bamasus and ordained at Antioch by the disciples of the apostles
in union with St. Peter. From that time he began to convert the
pagans to the church. But he had to go to Jerusalem, to give an
account to Peter of his work in the ministry, as he says: "after
three years I went to Jerusalem to see Peter."* Peter gave him
the special mission of converting the Gentiles. From that day to
this, St. Paul has been the greatest missionary the church ever
had.*
As Peter gave St. Paul his mission, we must conclude also that
he gave their missions to all the other apostles." His judicial
power appears in the condemnation of Ananias and Sapphira,' and
also in the election of the successor of Judas. We see that power
in his successor. Pope St. Victor, who replied to the disciples of
the apostle St. John: "You must hold the solemnity of holy
Easter on Sunday^ this our predecessors have already ordered, and
we command you to solemnly celebrate it on the same day, be-
cause it is not right for the members to separate from the head, or
do what is contrary to him."" We must remember that this Pope
who issues such a command to all Asia Minor and to the disciples
of St. John the Evangelist, was elected to the Roman diocese in
the year 193.
> Suarez De Sum. PnnUf. Sec- 7. I. n. 4. ' Bellarmine De Sum. PonUf. L. I. C. Ix. n. 44.
* Acts U. 4. « Gal. 1. 18. Ibidem II. 2. » Gal. II. 7. 8. 9. 10.
• Oerson De Potest, Eccl. Cons. 9. ^ Acts 5.
■ St. Victor Epist. I. and Tbeop. Epls. Alezan. apud Labb. T. I. col. 502. Tbia is only prob-
ably Kenuiue.
OKDERS AND JURISDICTION. 333
What we have said so far about the bishops of the pastors of the
universal church, shows the reader the great dignity of the bishops
of the church. Except our Lord himself there cannot be in this
world any higher or more wonderful person than a bishop of the
catholic church. Stunding above the world and below Jesus
Christ, ruled only by his Vicar the Pope, the bishops hold the
power of tlie Lord over the church of God. They have received
the fulness of the eternal Priesthood of the Son. They have re-
ceived fl'om him, his fulness of priestly power, not for themselves
but for the church, to teach, sanctify and rule his holy people.
Christ by episcopal consecration gives complete power to the
bishops, that they in tlieir turn may give a part of it to the priests
and to the lower ministers of the church. Now the fulness of a
thing is such that you cannot give any more. Thus the bishops
have so much of the priesthood of Christ, that even Christ him-
fielf could not give them any more of his priestly power. The
bishops are then so high, that they could not rise any higher in
the sacerdotal powers tliey received of Christ.
By that the episcopacy is one, simple and undivided in each
bishop.' It also follows that the bishops of the whole church are
absolutely equal, as St. Cyprian says: "the apostles were endowed
with equal honor and authority."* St. Jerome says that: ''the
bishop of Gubbino is equal to the bishop of Eome,^" inasmuch
as tliey are both bishops, jiot considering the Bishop of Rome as
being the head of another kind of power, that is of jurisdiction.
By that he is the Vicar of Christ and the head of all the bishops
of the world, because he is the head of the church universal.
But at a meeting of the bishops some will precede others. The
Bishop of Rome, because he is the Heir and the successor of Pe-
ter and Vicar of Christ, is the head of the whole church, and he
presides over all the bishops of the world. But he is only a bishop,
and considering holy orders he is not higher than the bishop of
the most obscure city. For that reason he addresses the bishops of
the world in all his communications to them as "Venerable
Brethren" because they are his brethren and equal in episcopal
order. St. Peter was at all times named the first among the apostles
after he had received the Primacy from Christ. For that reason
the Council of Lyons solemnly proclaimed that the "Holy
Roman church obtained the full and highest primacy and princi-
pality over the whole catholic church."*
For that reason the patriarchs, primates and archbishops being
the branches of the power given to Peter, they are like little Popes
over the bishops subject to them. At all meetings of the bishops
they precede the bishops, because they represent the Pope. Not
only that, but the church wishes to honor certain sees because of
peculiar reasons. In the meetings of the first bishops of the early
church, the bishop of Jerusalem was subject to the archbishop of
1 St. Cyprian De Unltate Eccl. n. 5. > Ibidem. ' Eplst. ad Evangellum.
^ IQ Profes. Fld^e. Grecorum.
WHO TAKES THE ABCHBISHOP'S PLACE ? 335
Cesarea, who in his turn was under the authority of the patriarch
of Antioch. But because of the honors due Jerusalem the holy
city, he was at length placed next after the archbishop of
Cesarea. When the council was called at this latter city under
Pope St. Victor, to discuss the celebration of Easter,' the arch-
bishop of Cesarea sat above the bishop of Jerusalem, as the repre-
sentative of the authority of St. Peter given to each archbishop.
Is not this a striking proof of the supremacy of Peter over all the
churches at such an early date ? But in after years, when the
whole episcopacy of the church met at the council of Nice, the
archbishop of Cesarea stepped down, and took his place with the
other bishops, because he no longer represented the authority of
Peter in the council, for he came as a simple bishop. At that
council, the bishop of Jerusalem who was only a bishop, sat among
the archbishops as the fourth bishop of the world, because they
wished to honor in him Jerusalem the holy city at that the
first general council of the church.* That forms one of the can-
ons of that celebrated council held in the year 325.' We give
these facts of history to show that these distinctions between the
bishops of antiquity, not only related to the Papacy, but also be-
longed to the old venerable apostolic cities of antiquity, and because
of their peculiar relations to our Lord or to the church.
Besides, certain peculiar circumstances elevated one bishop over
the others. In the East they are called protothroneries and in the
West deans. Thus the archbishop of Tyre,* was the prothronotary
of the bishops subject to the patriarch of Antioch. The bishop of
Ostia is the dean of the college of cardinals.^ In ancient times h&
was also the dean of the bishops of the province of Rome. The bish-
op of Autun was the dean of the province of Lyons." The bishop of
London was in former times in the middle ages and before
the reformation, the dean of the province of Canterbury.' In
Africa the bishop of Citra was the dean of all the bishops of
Numidia.
In the United States they have only deans of age in the episcopacy,
having no analogy with the episcopal deans of the early church.
When the III. council of Baltimore assembled in 1884, the arch-
bishop of St. Louis was the oldest in years of consecration, and
the other bishops showed him the utmost respect. When an
episcopal see becomes vacant and the council and the permanent
rectors of the diocese meet for the selection of three candidates for
the vacant throne, the aforesaid council says that if the archbishop
cannot come, the bishop longest consecrated shall take his place and
preside over the meeting, who, if he too cannot come he must appoint
another bishop to take his place.' In this we see, that the senior
bishop should be the dean of the bishops, when their customary head
the archbishop is not present. Thus from the most ancient times,
' Concil. Palaestin. Labbe T. I. Col. 596. ^ CoDcll. Vic. Can. 7. Col. 314 418
3 Labbe T. II. col. 51. ■» Ibidem T. vlil. col. 978 &c. « Ibidem T. x. col. 388.
« Le Cointe in the year 685. "> Le Cointe year 685.
8 Concil. Bait. T. III. D Eplscopis. No. 15.
336 WHAT IS A MISSION ?
when the representative of the Papacy, the archbishop, the primate
or the patriarch is not there, the church honors the oldest in epis-
copal orders by electing him to preside over them in the absence of
their regular head or chairman. From all that has been said, the
reader will see that when the bishops of the church meet without
their real head, the Successor of St. Peter, the distinctions between
ithem flows from three sources — the Papacy represented by the patri-
:archs, primates and archbishops, the privileges of illustrious sees as
.Jerusalem, Antioch, &c., or age in years of episcopal consecration.
The holy hierarchy of the bishops resembles the hierarchy of the
Persons of the Trinity. As the Son comes from the Father, so the
ibishops come forth from their father the Pope. From him alone
they get their jurisdiction, authority and their mission. From
liie Father, Christ received his mission and the fulness of his eter-
nal Priesthood. The mission once given is lasting in its effects.
Thus the sacrifice of Christ on the cross still goes on in the Mass,
and it will last as long as the world remains. The holy wounds of
Christ still remain in his sacred body, and from them flows down
•on us all the benefits of his atonement. Once ordained a man
forever remains a priest, consecrated a bishop, he will be a bishop
.as long as Christ remains the Son of God.
This is so with all the works of God. He rested on the Sabbath
•day from creating and creation still goes on, his creatures remain
•ever showing forth his glories, although he stopped creating new
species on the Sabbath day at the seventh great epoch of time. All
this is but an image of the hidden internal and eternal life of God.
For " In the beginning was ihe Word, and the Word was with
•God, and the Word was God."' That was the eternal generation
of the divine Son. His origin had no beginning, but it is still
going on and will be so, for with God there is no time, but eter-
nity without beginning or end.
We are all made to the image and likeness of God, but the
church was made to the likeness of the holy Trinity, while each
member of the church resembles the divine Son. The three
.sacraments of baptism, confirmation and holy orders raise us up to
& supernatural union with Christ, to the likeness of Jesus. Once
received, holy orders cannot be received again, because of the
changeless beauties of the priesthood of Jesus. Then once a priest
or bishop, he is that for eternity. Founded on hoiy orders is the
mission, that is the authority to exercise the powers received in
holy orders. But mission also comes only from Christ, who said :
** All power is given me in heaven and on earth going forth then
teach ye all nations."* The power of holy orders comes direct
from Christ himself at the ordination of the priest or the consecra-
tion of the bishop. But jurisdiction, or the mission, comes from
him through his Vicar the Pope. Unlike orders, the mission can
be taken away. That was necessary for the good of the church,
lest bad ones might intrude themselves into the ranks of the clergy
' Jobn i. 1. 1 Matt, urill. 19.
WHO GIVES JURISDICTION ? 337
to the destruction of souls. But jurisdiction or the mission once
given lasts till it is taken away by the one who gives it. To St. Peter
Christ gave complete jurisdiction, when he gave him the care of his
" lambs and sheep/' and the power to '' close or open heaven" to all
men. Then while any bishop can administer holy orders, only the
head of the church can allow the exercise of these orders. But as
the works of God are without repentance, every sacrament except
penance and confirmation is valid although forbidden when admin-
istered without jurisdiction or mission. From this it follows that
the orders given by the bishops of the schismatic Greeks and Orien-
tals, who reject the authority of the Pope are valid but forbidden.
From the principles here laid down it follows that only the Pope
can give a bishop jurisdiction over any diocese. Only by his com-
mand can bishops be consecrated in the church. As the Pope is
the Vicar of Christ and the supreme Pastor of the whole church,
then it follows that only he can appoint a bishop to a diocese one
of the great parishes of the universal church. Then those bishops
not in union with the Vicar of Christ are not the right bishops.
Even if they have received valid episcopal consesration, the people
must not receive the sacraments from their hands, for they do not
belong to the body of Christ. Only in the regular way, and ac-
cording to the laws, Christ saves souls, for as the soul works only
by and through the organs of the body, thus Christ saves only by
the organs of the church his mystic body. At the consecration
of a bishop, the letters of the Bishop of Rome are read before the
bishops impose their hands on the candidate.
The testimony of the early ages tells us that often by commis-
sion of the Popes or patriarchs, they consecrated bishops in every
age up to the time of the apostles: " It belongs to Peter to choose
the election of bishops his equals, that he may raise them to an
equal honor with himself, and we know that it belongs to no other
but to Christ, . . . .and among all mortals this belongs to Peter, who
in the place of Christ is the leader established, the Prince set up
by Christ." ' " The episcopacy and all authority flows from the
apostolic See," says Innocent I. in his letter to the council of Car-
thage. In his letter to another council he repeats: " Peter is
the author of the name and of the dignity of bishops."' "All
that Jesus Christ gave to the other bishops, he gave to them by
Peter," says St. Leo/ "From him as from his head, his grace
flows down on the body." * " If you think heaven is closed." says
Tertullian, " remember that the Lord gave the keys of the king-
dom of heaven to Peter, and by him he left them to the church. " *■
" For the sake of unity Peter was preferred to the other apostles,
and he also got the keys of the kingdom of heaven, which he was
to give to the others." ® " By Peter, Jesus Christ gave the keys
of the kingdom of heaven to the other bishops." ^
1 Maxim. Planud. Econ. in SS. Peter et Paul, Patrum Grace T. cxlvii. col. 1070.
^ Epist. ad Concil. Milev. ^ Sermo. Iv. in Nat. suo. No. 2.
* Ibidem Epist. X. rd. Episcopos Provinc. of Vienna. * Adv. Gcost.
• St. Optatus De Schism. Donatist. L. vii. n. 3.
'' St. Gregory of .Vyazan. Adversus Mfije Ferentes Castlsrat.
338 WHO APPOINTS BISHOPS ?
We might give many other citations from the early church, but
these are enough to show the belief of the apostolic age, that from
the apostolic See of Peter, the bishops in every age and nation re-
ceived their consecration and their authority. As authors say,
" partake in the authority and the freedom of that See." ' *' They
succeed Peter." 'or " They are the vicars of Peter," as the VI.
council of Paris proclaimed." ''Because their authority is only
given them by the blessed Peter," as the council of Rheims de-
clares.* The reason why the appointment and selection of bish-
ops belongs alone to the Pope, is because he is the Bishop of the
whole world, the Vicar of Christ who redeemed the world. The
bishops are the pastors of that great diocese, the whole redeemed
world. It belongs alone to the bishop of the diocese to ordain
and appoint priests and pastors in his own diocese. Therefore to
the Papacy, as the Bishop, who alone has universal jurisdiction
over all the souls redeemed by Christ, to him alone it belongs to
appoint pastors over his people, partaking in his supreme author-
ity in the universal church of Christ.
The reason of this is still deeper. The priesthood of Christ is
eternal. To him the Father said: " Thou art a priest forever ac-
cording to the order of Melchisedek." * His Vicar is the Bishop
of Rome. Being the most perfect image of that great High
Priest, Jesus, because of the indweUingof the Holy Spirit in him,
the Pope will never fail in teaching the world the true doctrines
of faith and morals. This comes from his remarkable union with
his chief Jesus Christ. The Pope cannot be deposed. For he is
one with his Bishop Christ, of which he is only the Vicar-general.
But no such a union exists between Christ and any of the other
bishops of the other dioceses. For that reason we never see the
Bishop of Rome doing an injustice to all, while sometimes the
bishops of the other dioceses have fallen into heresy or oppressed
the clergy and the people under their charge. The Pope is their
pastor. As it belongs to him to appoint them to their dioceses,
so to him belongs to depose them if they live not faithful
to their divine office. In the bishop of Rome then, dwells the
fulness of the Priesthood and jurisdiction of Christ, as well as
in all the other bishops. But the Pope may take away the jur-
isdiction of the other bishops, restrict or entirely suspend their
?owers depending on jurisdiction. But the jurisdiction of the
'ope cannot be so restricted, taken away, or curtailed by any earth-
ly power. For Peter lives in his successors " And the gates of hell
shall not prevail against" " that Rock of Peter," because of the
direct indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
Then by the very constitution of the church, the appointment
of the bishops of the church belongs to the Pope, the bead of the
church. In modern times the Pope appoints them by letters, bulla
and briefs. In the early church it was not easy to go to, or apply
> St. Ephlr. Encon. St. BazU. ^ Gaiident. Brlz. Tract, in die suae. ord.
» Apnd. Labbe T. vll. col. 166L * Ibidem T. ix. col. 4»1.
• Psalm clx. 4.
APPOINTING THE FIRST BISHOPS. 339
to Kome, or to get into direct communication with the Holy
Father, because of the difficulties of travelling, and oecause of the
frightful persecutions of the first three centuries. To overcome
these difficulties the first Popes impressed " The Image of Peter,"
on the whole church, by the appointment of patriarchs, primates
and archbishops in the great cities, each as a little pope over the
neighboring bishops and churches of his province. In delegating
a part of his supreme power to the bishops of these large and im-
portant cities, so that they represented the Bishop of Rome, over
the bishops and laity, and clergy of their provinces, he but gave
them a part of the supreme authority Christ gave to Peter, so
that the perfections and the form of the whole church might be
impressed on each part or province. As the bishops of every see
in the early church were elected by the votes of the clergy and
iaity of the vacant diocese, the churchmen thus elected and conse-
crated to these important sees, notified the Pope of their election
and consecration, and the patriarchs did not wait for the comfirma-
tion of the Pope, but exercised the functions at once as was cus-
tomary and given them by the councils.
The system was very simple. God alone through Jesus Christ
gave power to the Bishop of Rome through Peter, and from him all
jurisdiction came down from Christ, and flowed down on the
archbishops of other important sees, " images of Rome." From
the eternal throne, through Christ, the power of jurisdiction with
love and redemption for fallen man comes down on the anointed
Bishop of Rome. From him it flows to the archbishops to the im-
ages of himself over the other bishops, till the grace of redemption
and of salvation flows like living waters through the regular cliaii-
nels, till it touches and heals every wound afflicting mankind.
The root and the foundation of that power is the episcopal con-
secration. In former times the archbishops and the patriarchs
usually consecrated the bishops of the vacant sees within their
jurisdiction. That was always the custom among the Greeks of
the early church.' They were very careful whom they raised to
such a dignity in the church, for the consecration of a bishop at
that early time not only gave holy orders, but also jurisdiction or
the communion of the episcopacy, with his title as pastor of a
particular church. As delegates of the Roman Pontiff, these pa-
triarchs, primates and metropolitans consecrated the bishops of
the early church.
In holy orders the superior always confers them on the inferior.
But at the consecration of a bishop, one bishop raises another
<ilergyman up to an office, which makes him the equal with him-
self, for the bishop represents the Son coming forth from and the
equal of his Father, the Persons of the Trinity having one and the
same divine nature, as the bishops have one and the same holy and
complete priesthood. Whence Jesus Christ, entering into the
-eternal glories which he had with his Father before he became
' Barlaam de Papse Primatu C. 6. Patr. Grec. T. cli. col 1287.
340 CONSECRATING A BISHOP.
man, he supplies his absence since the ascension by the ministry
of his bishops, to whom he gave the fulness of his priestly powers.
Therefore any bishop can consecrate another bishop.
But no priest can ordain another priest, for no simple priest
receives the fulness of the priesthood, and therefore he cannot bring
forth another like himself. We see this in the natural generation
of living creatures. The complete race, represented by both fatlier
and mother must take part in the natural generation of another
like themselves, and full health and strength must be there. Th&
material is but an image of the spiritual. Christ the eternal Priest
went to heaven at the ascension, but the bishops take his place as
the complete ministers of the sacraments. Yet Christ still lives-
here regarding jurisdiction or the exercise of the powers of holy
orders, for his Vicar takes his place, because the vicars are the very
same, or form one moral person and one authority. But the sacra-
ments cannot be given rightly without jurisdiction. Therefore no-
bishop is allowed to consecrate another bishop without the official
letters of the Pope, the father of all bishops from whom they come
forth as the Son in heaven comes forth from his Father.
Although one bishop can consecrate another bishop, and it will
be a valid but sinful action, without the express letters of the Sover-
eign Pontiff, yet according to the laws of the church, the Pope
is there taking part as father by his official letters, and the episco-
pacy is there because three bishops must take part in the consecrat-
ing ceremony to represent the whole episcopacy of the ciiurch.
But there is one exception to this august representation of the
episcopacy. The Pope alone is allowed to consecrate a bishop with-
out any assistant bishops to aid him,' because he is the complete
source and father of the bishops, and takes the place of their real
Chief Christ. In the consecration of any bishop, the archbishop
lays hands on him, as the representative of the Roman Pontiff, who
cannot be present at all such ceremonies throughout the world.
It is very natural for the inferior to receive from the superior, the
bishop to receive the laying on of hands of the archbishop his met-
ropolitan, but not prescribed, the archbishop from the primate, the
latter from the patriarch, while he may be consecrated by the Pope
the Vicar of Christ, the great Bishop of us all.
It is evident that this cannot be carried out at all times, for it
would be very hard sometimes for nominated bishops at a distance
to go to their archbishop for episcopal consecration, or for the
metropolitan to come to tiiem. In the early ages, when travelling
was difficult, this could not be done. Otherwise the diocese migiit
be left a long time without a bishop. In the early church,
neighboring bishops came and consecrated the candidate, when the
archbishop could not come. There was still greater difficulties
regarding the consecration of an archbishop, whose see was far from
the city of the primate or the patriarch who usually consecrated
him. But when a patriarch was to be elevated to one of the vener-
■ i'lilKent. Ferand. Breviat can. n. 6, &c.
BRANCHES OF PETER. 341
able and historic sees, the Pope could not always leave Eome, be-
cause of political troubles, or because his time was taken up with the
business of the universal church. In that case the Pope sometimes
appointed one of the neighboring patriarchs or metropolitans to
take his place, but this appointment was not always waited for.
Thus we read that the archbishop of Tyre, in the early church, was
consecrated by the patriarch of Antioch, while the archbishop of
Ravenna received the imposition of hands from the Bishop of Rome
himself. When the archbishop, primate or the patriarch could
not come, all the bishops of the province assembled around the
vacant throne, and the dean, that is the bishop oldest in episcopal
orders, imposed his hands on the bishop elect, who in that was
aided by his brothers, the other bishops. They only supplied by
the common law the absence of the Pope their chief as the coun-
cil of Nice says. ' When they had not the express license of their
patriarch, they presumed his permission, which he afterwards rati-
fied. That was according to the common law. The simple bish-
ops thus consecrating an archbishop, did not by their act give
jurisdiction to their metropolitan, for before this the see which they
supplied with a prelate had been raised to the dignity of an arch-
bishopric, and by that any bishop consecrated to that see, became an
archbishop, a branch of Peter, with authority over all his suffragan
bishops, of the ecclesiastical province over which his predecessors
presided. But if it were found that the candidate thus consecrated
was unworthy, or a heretic, or preached false doctrines, the Pope
condemned him, or gave him ten days in which to retract his errors.*
Otherwise he was denied jurisdiction, which flows down on the
members from the Pope, the head of the visible body of Christ.'
In the ancient church jurisdiction was called communion or
rather the acknowledgement of confirmation of jurisdiction or
the " Pax," peace. In many of the monuments of the early church,
the Pope is said to give communion to a bishop, when he acknowl-
edges or confirms his jurisdiction in the diocese to which he had
been consecrated. When the Pope refused to receive a bishop in-
to his communion, by that he was excommunicated and cut off from,
the church. But this, the most severe punishment of the church,
was never inflicted except when there was no hope of reclaiming
the public sinner, as when a bishop illegally intruded himself into
the episcopal office and diocese of another bishop. " For " the in-
stitution of all priests and of all churches throughout the world has
its rise in the Prince of the apostles." ^
From this it follows that the authority of the bishops to exercise
their orders of jurisdiction comes from the head and the father of
bishops, the Roman Pontiff. Any inequality or authority they
have, one over other bishops, comes from the Pope, as he represents
the power given to Peter. Numerous proofs might be given from
' Concil. Nic. I. canon 4 Labbe T. il. col. 30.
* St. Coelestln I. Epist. ad St. Cyril Alex, ad Pat. Lat. T. L. col. 463.
» St. Fel. III. Epist. xiii. ad Flavlt. ■• St. Leo. Epist. L. ad Constan.
• Steven VI. ad Bazil. Labbe T. ix. col. 366.
342 THE GREEK SCHISM.
the writings of St. Cyprian from the council of Chalcedon with
almost numberless quotations from the writings of the early
church, to show that no priest or bishop was ever received in the
church except he lived in union with the See of Peter. But this
would make this book too large for its object. When the senior
bishop or the dean of the episcopal college in the absence of their
chief, imposed his hands with the other bishops on the head of the
candidate, he acted in the name of their superior the Pope who
was away and who could not come. When the Pope received the
newly consecrated bishop in communion, by that he confirmed what
was done in his name, and this confirmation gave the new bishop
full jurisdiction. We read that Pope St. Leo received the patri-
arch of Antioch in the council of Chalcedon, and gave him juris-
diction over all churches subject to that patriarchate. '
But when the candidate was a holy and worthy man, when the
election and the consecration were regular, the Pope never refused to
receive the new bishop into full communion, and always allowed him
to exercise complete jurisdiction in his diocese. We read that Pope
St. Leo confirmed the election of Proterius, archbishop of Alex-
andria. Pope St. Simplicius thus received Calendion, patriarch of
Antioch. * Even if there was any defect in the regularity of the pro-
ceedings, the Pope often supplied what was wanting. This was
done by Pope St. Leo, regarding Anatolius, archbishop of Constan-
tinople, who was consecrated by heretical bishops as he said: " I am
sorry that the weakness of his ordination troubles him."'
When the bad Photius drove the legitimate St. Ignatius archbish-
op of Constantinople, from his see by the power of the emperors of
the Greek empire, he was excommunicated by the Pope, and the
good and venerable St. Ignatius restored by the Roman Pontiff.
But after the death of Ignatius the clergy and the bishops of the
Byzantium empire with the government asked for the restoration of
Photius, who was related by the marriage of his uncle to the em-
peror's family. In reply Pope John VIII. elected to the Papal
chair later in 872 restored Photius to full communion of the church,
because he had before been excommunicated for his villainy. At
the death of St. Ignatius the Pope appointed him to the vacant see
of Constantinople. As a council of 318 bishops in 861 had confirm-
ed his election, and sent the archbishop Ignatius into exile the
reader can imagine the power of the Pope, who restored Ignatius
against all those bishops, with the whole power of the empire of
Constantine at their back. At that time began the unfortunate
division of the Greek schism, by which the East was separated from
the West. Often it was healed, but it broke out again by the per-
fidy and the bad faith of the schismatics. * The council of Nice held
in 325 enacted again the old rule that the archbishops should conse-
crate their suffragan bishops, and introduce them into their episco-
> Concll. Chal. Act. X. ap. Labbe T. Iv. 673, 682.
' St. Leo KplRt. cxvll. ad Julian. EpLst. Coens. n. I. et St. Simplicius Epist xvi. ad Acac.
* St. Leo EpLst. rxll. ad Pulrhor Auk- n. I. &<•.
* John vlli. Epist. ex cix ad Bazll ap. Labbe T. ix. col 181. 18S.
APPOINTING BISHOPS IN EARLY TIMES. 343
pal church in the presence of the archpriests, the archdeacons and
clergy of the diocese. ' In the Eoman province of Italy of which
the Pope is the archbishop, Pope Innocent III. reserved the ex-
amination of the candidates for vacant sees to the Papacy.
From the very beginning of the church the Bishops of Rome
watched and supervised the election and the consecration of bish-
ops. When they could not do so, they delegated it to the representa-
tives of the Holy See, to the patriarchs and archbishops. For that
reason some authors in canon law say that in the early church the
appointment of bishops was left in the hands of the archbishops.
Even the pagan emperors considered that rule of such weight, that
when there was a dispute regarding a vacant see, they looked to
the Bishop of Rome for a solution of the trouble. When Paul of
Samosates was deposed from the see of Antioch and his successor
Domnus received the letters from St. Dennis in the year 264 confirm-
ing his election in the place of the deposed Paul of Antioch,
the latter refused to give up the bishop's house, and the emperor
Aurelianus was called upon to settle the case. Although a pagan,
the emperor knew so well the customs of the church even in that
early time that he decided that the house belonged to the bishop
with whom the Bishop of Rome was in communion. This case is
given by Eusebius, one of the earliest historians of the church. ^
We must remember that this took place in the year 264, when the
■church was in the midst of a terrible persecution, and that the em-
peror and the whole empire was then fighting the church, showing
us that even the pagans believed in the supremacy of the Bishop
of Rome.
St. Ambrose tells us that all the bishops of that time were ac-
customed to look to the Bishop of Rome for letters confirming
their election and consecration to the episcopal office. In one part
of his writings he complains that Flavins alone was the only ex-
ception to that universal rule of the early church. " If, " before the
consecration, the bishops or archbishops could not receive such
letters from the Pope, they were very careful after their consecration
to go to Rome, or send some one to represent them, and get the
blessing of the Pope on their work. " *
When the troubles of the times of the persecutions would not
let them hurry to the feet of Peter's heir, they used to have their
names written on the dipfcics of their churches to show their suc-
cessors that they ruled the diocese. There were no exceptions
even for the great historic sees like Jerusalem, Antioch, Constan-
tinople, or Cesarea. The canons of the church and the customs
of the early ages required that the archbishops of these great sees
at once start for Rome to receive from its bishop jurisdiction, not
only in their own diocese, but also over all the bishops of the
provinces under them. " They did this in order to tell the Pope
* Concil. Nic. Can. 71. " Hist. Eccl. L. vll. C. 30. ' St. Ambrose Epist. Ivl. ad Theop.
* Soz. Hist. Eccl. L. 8. C. 3. Theod. Hist. Eccl. L. v. C 23.
* St. Simplicius Epist. ad Acac. Labbe iv. c. 10. 35. et St. Horm. Epist. Ixxi. ad Epiph,
Ibidem col. 1533.
344 GIVIKQ THE PALLIUM.
what took place in their provinces and to get from him their letters
confirming their jurisdiction. " Our predecessors " sa3's St.
Gelasius, ** addressed to the See, where sat Peter the Prince of
the apostles, laying before him the beginning of their labors,
asking of him strength and force in their work. " ' These great
bishops of the early church asked of the Roman Pontiff " authen-
tic letters of the Papacy confirming their election to the episcopal
office. " »
On their part the Popes of these early ages gave them the letters
as St. Leo says, thus " strengthening these foundations. " ' Pope
St. Boniface I. about the year 420 wrote: "No one doubts that
Flavins has been received into the grace of communion, which he
would never have received if he had not asked by these writings. '* *
The great council of Chalcedon published solemnly that: ''The
holy and most blessed Pope had conSrmed the episcopacy of the
holy and venerable Maxiraus the bishop of the church of Antioch.'"^
This custom was necessary. For the chief and important arch-
dioceses, primacies and patriarchates of the early church repre-
sented the Roman Pontiff in all the foreign countries over which
they ruled, as the branches of the Papacy, because iu those days
travelling was difficult and seldom undertaken.
Therefore in the early church, the jurisdiction of the Pope was
confirmed to those, who represented him over the other bishops by
apostolic letters, from almost the apostolic age, the authority of
Peter was typified by the pallium. Thus we read that in the IV.
Council of Constantinople they enacted that the bishops of Old
Rome and of New Rome, that is Constantinople, of Antioch and
Jerusalem, that the bishops of these sees should be consecrated,
as the old custom obtained by the imposition of hands, or by the
reception of the pallium from those who had the power. " * As
St. Innocent says the pallium aptly represents the office of the
" good shepherd, ** and the Pope sends them to the patriarchs,
primates and archbishops of the world, as a sign of the part they
take with him in the government of the universal church. ^
This was done in the early church as it is to-day, and the patri-
archs in their turn gave the pallium to the archbishops under them
as the IV. Lateran council says. *
The difficulties of going direct to the Pope then gave rise ta
such customs in the church. For the bishops of the sees near
Rome received their consecration from the Pope himself, or from
some one whom the Pope appointed to take his place. * But the
last remains of the custom allowing the archbishop to first consecrate
and then look to the Pope for the confirmation of that act, ended
with the decree of Innocent III., because travelling became easier
and the times of persecution had passed away in Europe. The
> St. Gelasius Eplst. xlv. » St. Boniface 1. Eplst. Vad. Ruf. et. Episoopas MacedoD. 6.
» St. Leo Eplst. Ix. ad Disc. Alex.
« St. Boniface elected In the year 430. Eplst. xv. ad Bef. n. 6.
• Concll. Chal. Act. Ix. * Concll. ConsUnt. Att- x. Reg. 17.
T De Sac. Altar. Myst. L- I. C. 63. • Can. 5.
• Innocent III. In Deer. GrBRory IX. L. I. Tit. t1. c. 44. Nihil, est Barlaam.
BISHOPS APPOINTING OTHER BISHOPS. 345
custom of archbishops, primates and patriarchs consecrating
bishops, before they got the permission of the Pope was only a con-
cession on the part of the Bishop of Rome. The metropolitans
never claimed it as a right. For the office of archbishop &c. is an
institution of the ciuirch, a branch of the power of Peter over the
other bishops, and it can be taken away at any time by the Pope
who gave it. Only the Pope, the bishops and the lower clergy are
of divine establishment, and they never can be taken awav by
man, for no man can interfere with the works of God. " Of all
tie members of mortals, Peter alone can establish others like him-
self over the bisiiops, for in the place of Christ, by Christ, he was
made their prince. " '
Because they could not do otherwise, the Popes allowed the
archbishops and the patriarchs to institute bishops in countries
far from Rome. When they could the Popes did it directly them-
selves. Thus we read that Pope Constantine, when travelling in
the East appointed twelve bishops in as many cities. " Pope
St. Martin told the bishop of Phihidelphia to appoint bishops in
every city depending on the dioceses of Jerusalem and of Antioch.'
We liave therefore seen the bishops scattered in their dioceses
throughout the world, we must now consider them united in coun-
cil legislating for the universal church, and that will be the matter
of the following chapter,
1 Maxim. Planud. * Anastas. Biblioth. in Constant. P. P.
' St Martin I. Epist. Phidel.
The Bishops Gathered in Council.
OD the Father dwells not alone in heaven. With him
are his Son and Holy Spirit, forming the Council of
the mighty Three in One. Before acting in creatures
they take council. At the creation of man they counciled to-
gether, saying: ''Let us make man to our own image and
likeness."' All things God made, he wrought to the image of
his divine Son. For having in himself all perfections in an intinite
and measureless degree, he could not create anything which would
not be like his Image, his Council, his Son, who "'In the begin-
ning was with God and the Word was God."' The Son therefore
is the Councillor of the Godhead. " I Wisdom dwelled in council
and am present in learned thoughts, ... .Council and equity is
mine. By me kings rule and lawgivers decree justice. " ' In all
his works therefore the Father takes council with his only begotten
Son.
The church the image of the Holy Trinity formed as the model
of the mighty Three, the church also has her councils, where the
Father of bishops takes council with his sons in the episcopacy of
the universal church. When God established the Jewish religion
as a preparation for the christians, he told Moses to make the tab-
ernacle according to the model shown him on the mount. * Acting
on the advice of his father-in-law, Moses appointed councillors
over Israel, * while the high-priest never undertook any important
matter without first getting their advice. Such was the figure
given the christian church, and such has been the custom from
the apostolic age. The Son and Holy Spirit are the councillors
of the Father. They come forth from the Father. The cardinals
are appointed by the Roman Pontiff, for they are his councillors,
the cathedral canons are the councillors of the bishop for they
are appointed by him, the bishops are the councillors of the Pope,
for he creates them. When they assemble from all parts of the
world round his throne, they form as it were the venerable congress
of the whole church, under the presidency of him their head and
father.
1 Oen. 1. 26.
* Exod. XTll.
» John 1. 1. * Prov. tIU. 12. 18. 14» 15. 16.
846
* Exod. XXT. zztL
348 THE FIRST COUNCILS AT JERUSALEM.
Some knowing no better, think that the councils make new
doctrines. But that is not so. For truth, being the image of
the Son in the mind of man, it cannot change. As revealed and
completed by the coming, of the Son, these supernatural truths
must remain the same as in the apostolic days, for they form the
constitution of the church, which Christ alone established and
only he can change them.
A council is a meeting of the bishops called by their head the
Roman Pontiff, who in person or by his legates presides over them.
They meet to make laws and to legislate for the churches under
them. But they also meet to take council together, to pray with
and for each other, to foster charity and brotherly love, and to
unite as the successors of the apostles, as they did in the cenacle,
the upper chamber belonging to the mother of St. Mark where
the Holy Ghost descended on the apostles.' The apostles them-
selves give us the first example of a council, for we read that they
often united in the upper ciiamber." While in council the Holy
Ghost came down on them in the form of tongues of fire." Be-
fore their death they held four councils at Jerusalem, which meet-
ings became the type and the model of all the future councils of
the church. Again they came together at the death and burial of
the Virgin Mother of their Lord. St. Paul also held a council.
For "sending from Miletus to Ephesus, he called the ancients of
the church....'' and said* "Take heed to yourselves and to the
whole flock, wherein the Holy Ghost hath placed you bishops to
rule the church, which he hath purchased with his own blood."*
Councils therefore are not new in the church. They proclaim
again the doctrines of the church held from the very beginning.
Christ being the source and the fountain head, because from him
through the apostles, come all the teachings and doctrines in tlie
church. For all the bishops, priests and Popes altogether could
not make a single new doctrine of the church.
While the church in unchangable in her doctrines, she is not so
regarding her discipline. For discipline relates to the way of ad-
ministpring the church, and she regulates her way of adapting her-
self to the various customs, manners, nations, tribes and peoples
of the world. As the people change from country to country and
from age to age, so the church changes her own laws to suit tiiese
changed conditions of men. That is discipline. Councils are
called then mostly to define doctrines when attacked, and to make
disciplinary laws for the better carrying out of church work when
the needs of the people require it. But no new doctrines can be
manufactured by any council.
Let us understand the church in her councils. Having been
made as an image of the Holy Trinity, the church shows us the
likeness of the mighty Three in One in her councils. The Pope
has his council, the bishops of tlie world. They are for him
> Acts 11. "Acta of the Apostles vUl. 14 ; xl. 1-2 ; ill. 2-3 ; xv. 2-3(). Gal. U. 2, 9.
» Acts 11. * Acta XX. 17-28.
THE bishops' titles TO THEIR DIOCESES. 349
as the Son is for the Father, the image of himself, coming forth
from him by his appointment. They never separate from him, but
rule their dioceses in and for him, and united to him they form
the grand presbytery of the universal church, as the priests of the
diocese compose the presbytery of the diocese. Thus we see that
the mystery of the church penetrates to each and every part and
■each part is a copy and an image of the whole church of Christ.
Christ first founded the universal church in the persons of the
apostles, and they erected the dioceses over which they presided
as bishops, ordaining priests to aid them in that work of their
ministry. But they formed the diocese according to the organ-
ization of the universal church, and when later the parishes were
formed out of the diocese they then became an image of the
latter. Thus we see that each church is a reproduction of the
church universal the image of the Holy Trinity.
The bishops of the universal church united in council, compose
the congress of the universal church, as the college of cardinals
form the senate of the Roman diocese, as the cathedral chapter
makes the senate of the diocese. But because the bishops partake
in the communion of episcopal orders, the bishops first of all be-
long to the universal church, as the cardinals belong to the Roman
diocese, and as the members of the cathedral chapters belong to the
diocese. But because of their titles, as bishops of certain dioceses
they rule these dioceses. Whence their episcopal consecration
gives them a subordinate power over the whole church, while
their titles as bishops of certain dioceses gives them power to rule
these dioceses as their own. Such it is in the universal church,
and we see an image of the same in the diocese, the copy of the
church universal. Ordination gives a clergyman tlie right of be-
ing numbered with the clergy of the diocese, and his appoint-
ment to a church of the diocese gives him the right to be the pas-
tor of that church, and to rule it in his own name, guided by the
discipline of the diocese and according to the laws of the universal
church.
Thus episcopal consecration gives to all bishops the right of
belonging to the universal church, making them all equal, and
in episcopal orders one is not above another, for they all are com-
plete priests, and all bishops have the same power over the real
body and blood of Jesus Christ. But founded on holy orders, we
find the title, giving the right to rule a certain diocese and in this
the bishops are not equal. For because of his title as Bishop of
Rome, the Pope is over all the churches of the world, while other
bishops rule not simple dioceses but archdioceses and patriarchal
sees, and in these things the bishops are not equal, and this differ-
ence of authority among them comes not from holy orders but
from jurisdiction, because the Pope with the fulness of jurisdic-
tion erected some dioceses over others, giving the bishops of these
sees the titles of archbishops, primates or patriarchs.
Therefore as a priest may belong to no parish but to the whole
350 THE CONGRESS OF THE CHURCH.
diocese, when he has charge of no parish, thus a bishop may be-
long to no diocese but to the whole church when he has no title.
But because of the dignity of the episcopal order each bishop should
have the title of some episcopal city as well as episcopal consecra-
tion, and in theearly church no priest or bishop was advanced to holy
orders, without giving him the title of a diocese or of a church.
Whence the reader can see that the power of the bishops over the
universal church diifers from the authority by which they rule
their dioceses, the great parishes within the universal church.
For this reason St. Ignatius calls the bishops: "The pastors of the
catholic church."' That St. Paul meant when he said to the bish-
ops he had established: "Take heed to yourselves and to the whole
flock, wherein the Holy Ghost has placed you to rule the church
of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.'"
The mystery of the whole episcopacy of the world, united with
their head the Bishop of Rome appears above all in an ecumenical
council, where they assemble with the Pope as their chairman,
and in that meeting, the most august which can assemble, there
the wonders of the episocpacy appears in all its strength, beauty
and perfection. In such a congress or legislature of the church
universal, under the presidency of the Roman Pontiff, there the
mystery of the kingdom of God shines forth with all its brightness
before the eyes of mankind. Let us stop and study it more in
detail. But first we should raise our thoughts to heaven, to the
Holy Persons of God, of which the church is the image.
In heaven the Father gives all his divinity to the Son, and all
the Son has he receives from his Father. The nature of the God-
head is in the Wisdom of the Father, the Light, the Truth and
every perfection of the Father, the Son receives all from the Father,
and the church brings forth images of these perfections in God,
but marked with the imperfections of created things. In the
council, all the bishops being equal in holy orders, they are not nor
can they be supreme in authority, or as teachers of faith and momls.
What they have not they cannot give, and as they have not au-
thority over the universal church, they do not elect their chairman
or their head. The Pope is their head, as the Father is the head
of the Son, and as the Father gives all he has to the Son, so the
Pope the Father of bishops gives the bishops light, power, strength
and divine influence.
Therefore an ecumenical council to have force, must have
these three marks: it must be called by the Pope; he must preside
over it either personally or by his legate, and he must confirm
the decrees. If one or more of these conditions be absent the
decrees or laws of the council have no force. As in the Deity all
comes from the head, the Father, so in the church all comes from
the head of the church the Pope. Without him no council can
be held, he or one representing him is always the head and the
chairman, and without him they could have no presiding officer.
> Eplst. ad Phlladel. ad Ephes. ad Trail. Llv. I. Cap. v. vll. se<'. HI. » AcU xx. 28.
THE CHAIEMAif OF THE CONGRESS. 351
For the bishops being equal in holy orders, they could not choose?
a chairman in the place of the Pope or in place of his representa-
tive the patriarch, primate or archbishop or the papal delegate.
The bishops who would unite without their head could not hold
a council. For when united in such a council of bishops would
be no greater united together than they were when separated.
Now the bishops scattered throughout the world have but a rad-
ical, unformed and incomplete authority over the universal
church, and united without their head, the Pope, they would
have no more and no less than the same power. The presence
then of the bishop of Rome completes their radical and incomplete
authority over the church universal, because he is the Bishop of
the whole world, the Pastor of Christ's sheep-fold to whom Christ
said : " Feed my lambs Feed my sheep." From this appears how
falsely conclude some, who think that the bishops of the Avhole
world could meet in council, depose a Pope, make laws indepen-
dently of him, reform his decrees and judge him or his actions.
The Pope being the bishop of bishops, he is the head and chair-
man of the council. He confirms the decrees, ratifies their decisions,
vetoes their laws, and can reject the bills or measures which he does
not approve. In doing this he uses the form: " The whole coun-
cil approving, " not that the council approves but because he ap-
proves. These words show that he and the council are one, and
united as the members of the body with their head, it shows
that there is no division among them. The force and authority
of the decrees of the council come, therefore, not from the bishops;
composing it, but from the Pope calling them together, presiding
over them, and promulgating the statutes and decrees. "The
Holy See is of the Roman Church, by whose authority and sanction
allsynodsand holy councilsare strengthened and receive power.*
Again we must consider the united bishops sitting in this au-
gust assembly of that congress of the whole christian world. AH
the bishops of the world must be called to the council. If some stay
away, because of sickness etc., yet by divine right all can come, and
no power on earth can take away that right from any bishop in
union with the Roman Pontiff. Every one with episcopal conse-
cration, who is not excommunicated can come and take his seat.
For they do not come as the representatives of their dioceses, but as
the senators and the pastors of the universal church. Whence
those bishops who rule flourishing dioceses, those bishops who
have the title of dioceses now overrun by the pagans, bishops-
without titles, all without an exception have a right to sit in the
council. Those who would hold a contrary opinion do not ap-
pear to understand the nature and the organization of the church of
Christ. The bishops sit in council, because they belong to and
are the pastors of the universal church. For the Lord Jesus,
first founded the church universal in the persons of the apostles,
and they belonged to the universal church founded by him before
> St. Nicholas I. Epist. aPhotiis. Lab.
352 THE MEMBEES OF THE C0XGKES8.
they become the pastors of any particular churches or dioceses.
We read in the Acts of the apostles that they held the first uni-
versal councils of the church at Jerusalem before their separation,
when only one of them, St. James first bishop of Jerusalem, was
:a bishop of any particular church or diocese.' The apostles sat
in that first council by right of their pastorate over the whole
•church.
No one but a bishop who has received episcopal consecration
-can sit in the universal or ecumenical councils of the church, be-
cause only the bishops are the senators or pastors of the universal
■church. To them in the persons of the apostles the Lord said:
•*' Going forth therefore teach ye all nations."' By that he made
them the spiritual teachers, the doctors and the rulers of all
the nations of the earth. The reader will therefore understand
that the church is not a reunion of all bishops representing the
dioceses of the world. The church was founded by our Lord in
the persons of the apostles before there was a diocese in existence,
and therefore the bishops sit in council, not as the heads and repre-
sentatives and spokesmen of the dioceses, but as the senators, pas-
torsand bishops of this same universal church founded by our Lord.
By divine right given them by our Lord himself, the bishops teach
the nations of the world, the matters of faith revealed to the apos-
tles by Jesus Christ himself. The decisions of the council of the
church are to be obeyed as the voice of God himself, for Christ
said: " Behold I am with you all days even to the consummation
of the world.'"
As the bishops meet in council not as the pastors of their dio-
ceses, but as the senators of the universal church, it follows that
they are all equal as judges of faith and morals. From that
it follows also that the votes of the patriarchs of the venerable sees
of Alexandria, of Antioch or of Constantinople, have no more
weight than the votes of the bishops of the most obscure dioceses,
or even of those bishops who rule no dioceses. In the early
church that principle was not clearly understood. In the council
of Chalcedon, frightened at the tyranny and persecutions of
Dioscorus, some of the bishops of Egypt pretended that the patri-
archs of Alexandria could cast their votes for them, and claimed the
right to abstain from voting, till Hierarchus archbishop of Alex-
andria had voted, saying: "We wait the vote of our blessed arch-
bishop, and we ask your kindness to let us wait for the vote of
■our president, for we follow him in all things. For the Holy
Fathers gave this rule, that all Egypt shoull follow the archbish-
op of the great name of Alexandria, and that nothing should be
done by any bishop subject to him without his consent. '* At
once the whole council cried out against the bishops of Egypt,
and they.had to vote in their turn. * The voice of antiquity
tells us that the bishops in ancient councils did not vote because
1 Acts of tbe Apost. * Matb. utIU. 19. * Hatli. xzrUi. 90.
* Concil. Cbalc SesB. IV. Labbe T. It. ool. 518.
BISHOPS OF ANCIElfT SEES IN THE COUNCIL. '663
of the sees they occupied, but because of their episcopal diguity
and consecration To give them any prominence or attach more
weiglit to the vote of any bishop, because of the prominence of
liis episcopal see, is to lay the seeds of heresy and division.
This we see in the case of the impious Photius, archbishop of Con-
stantinople. Constantinople being the seat of the Greek empire,.
its bishop became very prominent over the bishops of the whole
East. They all looked to him for direction. Although for
many centuries the episcopal chair of Constantinople had been;
occupied by saints, still when Photius fell into schism all the
bishops of the empire, who looked to Constantinople as to their
patriarchs and archbishops, they nearly all followed him into the
heresy of the Greek schism. Their followers are known to-day as
the Greek schismatics. Ethiopia and Egypt followed the arch-
bishop of Alexandria into the schism of the Copts. The same
can be said of the christians subject to the patriarchs of An-
tioch. They now form the schismatics of the East. Only the
Bishop of Rome has any superiority over the other bishops, and
that comes from his position as Bishop of Rome, heir of Peter and
supreme Pontiff over the whole church.
Yet we must admit an exception in the case of one of the old and
venerable apostolic dioceses of the world, where the church has
flourished for many centuries from apostolic times. A bishop of
such a diocese is the witness of the old traditions of his church. As
the bishop is the head of the diocese, he carries in his person all
the perfections of the body of the people, his church and spouse,
and therefore he can give a better testimony of the traditions
of his church and people, than any bishop of a newer diocese.
As the faith of the apostles comes down to us, not only by holy
Scriptures, but also by tradition, so the words of such a bishop
will have great weight in the council. In the same way the
bishops of Jerusalem, of Alexandria, of Antioch, of Ephesus and
of the old apostolic sees were better witnessess of the faith of the
apostles transmitted by their churches, than other bishops of re-
cently erected dioceses. The bishop of a people disturbed by
false doctrines, by heresies and by the teachings of infidels, will
be a better Judge of the needs of the church to remedy these
troubles, than the bishops of a diocese where exist no difficulties
of this kind. But all these relate to the discussion and not to
the decisions of the council. In deciding the bishops are all
equal, but in discussing matters before arriving at the conclusion,
they are not equal, for they may be of unequal learning, elo-
quence, experience, &c. The bishops are entirely free both in
discussing and in voting in all the coancils of the church. Thus
when the decree of infallibility of the Pope was defined in the IV.
chapter of the Vatican council, all voted for it but two bishops,
who voted against it, thinking that the time had not yet come
for defining that dogma held from the very days of the apostles.
As tlie Pope is the head and infallible guide of the churchy his
354 THE GREAT COUNCILS.
confirmation alone is required that the decrees of any council
may be legitimate and binding in conscience. Therefore the
number of bishops, whether there be few or many at the council,
makes no difference regarding the decrees. If they were con-
firmed by the Pope, that is enough to make them binding on the
whole christian world. Following this rule, we find that many
of the councils, which are now considered of the highest weight,
were at first but provincial or national meetings, or attended by
few of the bishops. They were afterwards confirmed by the Popes,
and that made them binding throughout the whole christian church.
In thus confirming national or provincial councils, the Pope
shows his power as the head of the church universal by giving author-
ity and strength to these partial assemblies, and sending their de-
crees outside the boundaries of the jurisdiction of the bishops,
which compose them, and extending them to the whole church by
virtue of his supreme pontificate. To him alone the Vicar of
Christ it belongs to give force, sanction and authority to these
laws, because from him flows the life of Jesus down on all the
church his body.
Many examples of history could be cited where the councils
were not universal, or they were formed of the episcopacy of the
church, or labored under a defect or they were incomplete till rem-
edied by the solemn confirmation of the supreme and visible
head of Christ's body the Pope. Thus the second council of
Constantinople was not called by the Pope, nor presided over by
him or his legates, neither did any bishops attend beside the prel-
ates of the East. But the Eoman Pontiff afterwards confirmed
the decrees of this council, and that was enough to supply the
above mentioned defects, for they have since been considered as
binding on the whole christian world. Although numerous coun-
cils were held in the early church, where all the bishops were
called, and over which the Popes presided, either in person or by
their legates, and these assemblies have great weight in the church,
yet because of the importance of their decrees, the four councils
of Nice against the Arians in 325, of Constantinople against the
Macedonians in 381, of Eplieseus against the Nestorians in
431, and of Chalcedon against Eutyches and Marcian in 451,
these have been held in such esteem as to be compared to tlie four
Gospels.
Up to the present time nineteen ecumenical councils have been
held in the church, as well as forty-one remarkable particular
councils.
But each and every council presided over and ratified by the
Roman Pontiff as Pope, their decrees relating to faith and morals
were considered as infallible, the same as coming from Christ
himself. Such are the councils of Sardica, the IV. council
of Rome held in the year 382, that of Bari presided over by
Urban II., where was settled a difficulty regarding St. Anselm
archbishop of Canterbury. The councils may be divided into two
HOW COUNCILS EXTEND TO THE WHOLE CHUECH. 355
classes, those which were presided over by the Pope, as Bishop of
the whole church, and those assemblies where he sat not as Pope,
but as patriarch of the West, as primate of Italy, or as archbish-
op of the Koman province. In the councils of the first rank,
shine forth the mystery of the church in all the splendors of the
whole episcopate, united to their head and receiving all their life
from him.
The Greek schism caused by the rebellion of Photius archbishop
of Constantinople, and the total destruction of the Greek empire
by the capture of Constantinople by the Mohammedans in 1453
put an end to the great unions of the East and the West, or of
the Latin and the Greek speaking nations. But the church still
continued her legislative enactments and decrees by the councils
she held in the West. The Greeks, having been cut off from the
head by their rebellion, and by the devastations of the Turkish
empire, they belong no more to the body of Christ, for they
separated themselves from the head the Papacy. Before this
time many general councils called Eoman councils had been held,
but from this epoch they began to disappear. They had been at-
tended chiefly by Latin bishops of the West or European prelates,
while the great ecumenical meetings were composed of all the
bishops of the whole christian world. We do not include in any
of these meetings the councils of the bishops of Italy under the
Pope as their primate, or the numerous councils of the Roman
province presided over by the Pope as archbishop of his province,
such as Pope Benedict XIII. held with his suffragan bisnops of
the Roman province. These legislative bodies, not belonging
to the universal church, or presided over by the Pope as head of
church and Vicar of Christ, their statutes only bound the dioceses
under these bishops Avho were called, and not the whole body of
Christ, unless the Pope extended them to the whole church by a
positive decree. Thus as a tradition of the Roman councils, the
Pope at the canonization of the saints calls to take part with him
in the ceremonies all the bishops present in Rome. That has the
appearance of a council. ' Thus the first council of Constanti-
nople was not an ecumenical or even a general gathering of the
bishops of the world. But later it acquired the authority of an
ecumenical council, and its decrees were extended to the whole
church by a decree of the Pope after it was held. In the same
way the council of Orange was but a provincial meeting, but its
decrees regarding faith were approved by Pope Boniface^ and thus
he extended them to the whole church, because it condemned the
Pelagians and Semi- Pelagians and their peculiar errors regarding
free will and grace.
We have written not only regarding ecumenical but also general
and provincial councils. Let us understand it better. The
church is the mystic body of Christ, receiving all her life, grace,
strength and movements from him her head. He gives all his
* Benedict, xlv. de Beatif. et Canon. Sanct. L. I. C. xxxiv.
356 COUNCILS THAT ARE KOT UNIVERSAL.
powers to the Pope his Vicar, from whom all jurisdiction flows
down upon the rest of the body. As in any living organism all
life comes from the head, as the branches of every tree live on
the trunk, so live the branches of the vine of Christ — for he is the
vine we are the branches. All men must be united to the Papacy
to spiritually live. We have spoken of the patriarchs, the pri-
mates and the archbishops the branches of the supremacy of Pe-
ter. These are as so many little popes. They represent the Pope
presiding o'ver their suffragan bishops as the branches of the Pap-
acy. To them by direction of the Pope it also belongs to call a
council of the bishops under them. There again in that solemn
assembly of prelates we find: "the form of Peter," the type, the
image of the universal church. There the bishops of the patriarch-
ate, of the whole nation or of the province united under their
chief, from whom they received the impulse by which they hold
the council. There we see again an image of an ecumenical coun-
cil of the church universal. The presiding officer of these meet-
ings is the archbishop, if it be a provincial council, the pri-
mate or legate of the Pope if it is a council of the whole nation,
or the patriarch if a council of all the bishops of a patriarchate,
the same as the Pope presides over all the bishops of the universal
church. The bishops do not appoint a chairman, because
they have no authority one over the other, as they are all equal in
holy orders, whence authority over them must come from Peter
in his successor.
As the Pope either in person or by his delegate presides over
the bishops of the whole world, a likeness of Jesus over his church,
so the patriarch, as the image of the Pope, presides over the bish-
ops of all the dioceses and archdioceses subject to his patriarchate,
and under his care. That is a council of a part of the church,
composing only the prelates of that part of the world, over which
the patriarch presides. The dignity of the chairman, the numer-
ous episcopacy, and the extent of territory ruled by the assembled
bishops make it the next to an ecumenical council. But in ac-
knowledging the right of the patriarch to preside over them, they
see in him not his own personal authority, but that of the Pope,
whom he represents. The Pope being one with Jesns Christ, the
Lord himself is their chairman in the person of their patriarch.
When the bishops of a whole nation meet in council the primate
presides over them in the name of Peter. When a provincial
council is called, the presiding officer is tiie archbishop. There-
fore the bishops do not choose their chairman, as is always done
in political meetings, for the people have the right to choose their
chairman, for they rule themselves. But in the church all having
been regulated by our Lord at the time he was on earth, the whole
machinery of its government, is provided by the common laws of
its divine constitution. When the patriarch, primate or arch-
bishop dies or is absent, the council is deprived of the head pro-
vided for it by the common law. The law of the church provides-
THE CHAIRMAN IN PROVINCIAL COUNCILS. 357
that incase the archbishop, primate or patriarch representing the
Pope be absent, the authority falls back on all the bishops equally
to supply a chief. By the common law and custom the presiding
bishop will be oldest in consecration. By priority of episcopal
years lie is the dean of the assembled college, because he is the
senior bishop. But he is not their real and natural head, because
he has not received the pallium or the appointment of the Pope
by which he represents or heads a branch of the Papacy. His
brethren of the episcopacy have been deprived of their father by
death or accident, and he only supi)lies for the time being his place.
Somewhat in the same way the priests of a diocese, the adminis-
trator, the cathedral chapter, or the vicar-general supply the ab-
sence of their bishop when the latter dies or is absent. Thus the
divine life of the body of Christ flows from the heart of the
church, the Papacy, thi'ough all the channels and arteries unto the
uttermost ends of the earth, giving life and grace and salvation
unto all in union witn Rome through Peter and up to Christ.
When decrees of these councils relating to faith and morals have
been formed, they must be sent to Rome for review, because to the
Roman Pontiff it belongs to define matters relating to faith and
morals. He alone is infallible in faith and morals, and not the bish-
ops separated from him. He examines them to see that these
decrees of councils have no false doctrines, before they are promul-
gated to the clergy and the people of the regions under these
bishops. For these reasons the decrees of any councils are never
published till they have been reviewed by the Popes, or the congre-
gation appointed for that purpose.
When all the priests of a diocese assemble together under their
bishop in an assembly of the diocese they make laws for the diocese.
It is a kind of a council, but it is called a diocesan synod. The
decrees of such a synod relate mostly to matters of discipline, the
administration of church property, the sacraments, &c. Not touch-
ing faith and morals, the statutes of diocesan synods are not sent
to Rome for review. For the Pope wishes to leave each diocese
free in the administration of its home government or internal af-
fairs. In the case of a diocesan synod, the diocese being the image
of the universal church, of which the Pope is the universal bishop,
the bishop presides in the diocese as tlie Pope in the church uni-
versal, and of which the diocese and the parishes are the image.
Whence as the bishops are the pastors of the church universal, and
in a council they all meet under the presidency of their bishop the
supreme Pontiff, so in the diocese, which is a copy of the whole
church, the pastors of the diocese meet under the presidency of
their bishop, although they are not the judges of faith and morals.
The bishop makes laws and enacts statutes for the territory sub-
ject to him. As in a councilof the bishops of the universal church,
the whole assembly receives its impulse, strength and power from
the head, the Pope, so in an ecumenical council the Pope or his
representative presides but if a provincial, it is the primate or arch-
358 THE EPISCOPAL DEANS.
bishop. From the Pope must come all movement and authority
in any council. Without his sanction either personally or through
his legate there is no council of bishops. Thus we see that the
church like a living organism reproduces itself and brings forth its
images in every part of its vast extent.
Ancient history offers us many examples of councils, which ex-
plains the mystery of the church we have been describing in her
councils. We will cite but a few of them for want of space. We
have said that the North of Africa was subject to the archbishop of
Carthage. Under him were once six ecclesiastical provinces. The
bishops of each province often assembled in council. Not having
among them their metropolitan, the archbishop of Carthage,
they fell back on the common law, and appointed as their chair-
man their dean, who by ordination was senior bishop. He took
the name of primate according to the customs of these countries.
In some countries such prelates were called deans of the episcopal
college. In other places they were known as prothonotaries.
These primates of Africa were in no way compared to the primates
of other parts of the world. For while the former presided over
councils only composed of the bishops of a province, when the
archbishop M^as absent, the latter presided over all the bishops of
many provinces, or of a whole nation, because they were the arch-
bishops of the oldest or chief see in the nation. In Numidia, the
primacy usually belonged to the see of Cirta or of Constantine,
which never became the seat of an archbishop. Yet this rule
regarding the senior bishop being the dean and primate in the
episcopal college, was not always followed in the ancient church of
Africa. For the primacy was sometimes attached to certain promi-
nent sees of the ecclesiastical provinces. Thus we read that the
bishop of London was the dean of the ecclesiastical province of the
archdiocese of Canterbury, the bishop of Anton was the dean of
the province of Lyons in ancient France. The most celebrated of
these deaneries is that of Ostia in the Pontifical province of Rome
of which the Pope is the archbishop. For that reason the bishop
of Ostia has the right of consecrating the Pope, if the latter is not
already a bishop on his election, and he crowns him with the tiara,
the triple Papal crown, because he is the dean of the cardinals with
the rank of chief bishop in the college of cardinals.
The councils presided over by the archbishops of Carthage were
called plenary councils. Following that ancient custom, the coun-
cils of Baltimore, composed of all the bishops of this country and
presided over by the archbishops of Baltimore are called plenary
or national councils, although the church knows no race or nation,
because national divisions and distinctions of peoples into nations,
come from climatic and natural causes influencing them for many
generations after they came from the race of Adam. The church
tends to unite them all again into the race of Christ, which is the
christian church. These councils of Africa composed of the bish-
ops of many provinces must be considered as so many provincial
HISTORIC PROVINCIAL COUNCILS. ?/59
gatherings under the great archbishops of ancient Carthage. From
what has been said, it will appear that the deans or prothonotaries as
they were called, or primates of the African churches only presided
in the absence of the metropolitan, the regular head of the council
and not in their own name, as the latter alone represented St. Peter.
The councils of ancient Carthage, especially the first tour, were
very celebrated in history. It was at the third and fourth councils of
Carthage that the apocrypha] gospels were rejected from the Bible,
and there the canon of the holy books as we have them now was
finally established, as well as many measures, which the church fol-
lows even till our day. The ancient city of Toledo, Spain, as well
as Orleans in France saw numerous celebrated councils meet with-
in their walls. May we hope that Baltimore in future ages may
become as famous for the wisdom and far reaching utility of the
statutes of the plenary councils which will meet within the walls
of its noble cathedral.
The archbishops, primates and patriarchs, who in the name of
the Pope, and as his representatives, preside over these provincial or
partial councils, shed down their powers on the bishops under them
as the Pope himself. They publish the decrees with the words
" the council approving.^' There again appears the authority of
Peter over all bishops. For that authority and supremacy over
the assembled prelates, comes from Peter through the Papacy to the
presiding archbishop, who as holding that supremacy over them
sits as another Peter. St. Charles Borromeo, archbishop of Milan,
held that it properly belonged to the one archbishop presiding
over the council as the representative of the Peter to define and
interpret the decrees. But this does not take place when the
archbishop or apostolic delegate being absent, the dean or sen-
ior bishop of the assembled episcopacy takes his place. For the
latter has no part in the supremacy of Peter over the other bishops,
the same as the patriarch, primate or archbishop. The common
law and ]iot the direct act of the Pope has made him chairman.
The archbishop, primate and patriarch, when their office is at-
tached to the see they occupy and ex officio come from the direct
appointment of the Holy See, and they represent the Pope in
presiding over councils. The archbishop is the head of the
ecclesiastical province, and the bishops their subjects, are called
their suffragans, and they preside as metropolitans. All this was
determined by the Pope when he erected their episcopal metropoli-
tan sees. We see at once that their whole authority depends on the
Pope, the successor of Peter, to whom Christ gave to "■ feed his
lambs and feed his sheep."
As the Holy See marks out the boundaries of the ecclesiastical
provinces, and nominates the city which will be the seat of the met-
ropolitan, and the bishops of these sees will be afterwards archbish-
ops, primates or patriarchs. But no bishops of other provinces have
any right to sit in a council of that province. Other bishops may
' ConcU. Medlolan. in the year 1565. Concil. Burdigal, in 1624, &c.
360 WHAT BISHOPS SIT IN PROVINCIAL COUNCILS.
come and take part in the deliberations, hear the matters discussed,,
but only the prelates of the province have a vote. History offers
us many examples of this, but we will not take up space giving
them. Archbishop Lynch of Toronto in this way sat in the III.
Plenary council of Baltimore in J884, but he did not vote, as he did
not belong to the United States.
Ecumenical councils, being composed of all the bishops of the
world, they extend to the whole church. But national and pro-
vincial councils, being formed of the bishops of these regions,
their decrees do not extend beyond the confines of the the prov-
inces of the bishops who sit in them, because their authority and
jurisdiction does not extend beyond the dioceses over which they
preside as bishops. The bishops being the pastors of the universal
church, in a council of the province, they exercise their powers as^
bishops of the whole church only over the province, of which they
compose the episcopacy. Having the titles of bishops of cities of
that province, by virtue of which they govern their dioceses, in a.
council they exercise the common rights of the episcopal order, by
which they are bishops or pastors of the universal church. By
this episcopal communion, they apply the power they have over the
whole church to the province of which their dioceses form a part.
But while they are the bishops and pastors of the whole church,
the Pope is their bishop, as they are in their turn bishops over their
priests. Therefore the mystery of Peter spreads over the world, ex-
tends to the whole church, binding all into the most perfect and
harmonious whole. There are wheels without and wheels within,
all moving with the most wonderful harmony, but the whole ma-
chinery put in motion by the main wheel the Papacy, while this^
was first set in motion by the authority Christ gave to Peter.
The bishops sit in councils, not because they are bishops of cer-
tain dioceses, that is because of their titles to these dioceses, but
because they are members of the whole college of bishops scattered
throughout the world, united to their head the Pope, through
their archbishops, primates and patriarchs. The limits of the
dioceses having been marked by the Holy See, the bishops of a-
province sit in a provincial council. As the bishops are known by
their titles, as prelates of certain dioceses, so tnese titles give
them the right to sit in these particular councils. But in former
times, thev were not so restrained. We read that St. Hilary, bish-
op of Poitiers, when in exile from his native France, sat in the
councils of the bishops of Asia assembled at Selucia, after he had
subscribed to the faith proclaimed by the Nicene council as was-
customary in these ancient times. '
The councils composed of the bishops of a province, of a country,
or of a patriarchate held under their regular patriarchs, primates
or archbishops are the regular councils of the church. 1 he com-
mon or canon law of the church provides, that they should be held
frequently, " for the reformation of morals, the correcting of ex-
• Sulp. Sev.
WHAT BISHOPS SIT IN PEOVINCIAL COUNCILS. 361
■cesses, the ending of controversies,'^ and for other things stated in
the canons. Whence they are presided over by the metropolitans
or if prevented, by the senior bishop. Such councils should be
frequently held. " Within three years from the last they should
hold another council."* An extraordinary council is formed not
of the ordinary province, nation or patriarchate, but of many prov-
inces united together by order of the Holy Father and under him
or his legate as presiding chairman. They legislate for the special
needs of the church in that part of the world. Such were the
councils of ancient France under Pope St. Boniface," the councils
of Rheims ' and of Paris * held under Pope Sts. Leo IX., and
those of Pictavia, Wirtzeburg, Avingnon &c. under Pope St.
Oregory VII.' The third council of Baltimore was called by or-
der of Leo XIII. under archbishop Gibbons of Baltimore, after-
wards a cardinal. It was an extraordinary meeting of the bishops
of the United States to remedy the evils which threatened the
church in this country. The church in the United States and in
fact in about all English speaking countries is still in a missionary
state not yet having its complete organization.
The Apostolic Constitutions say that a provincial council should
be held twice each year." But while that might have been done
in the early days, it is scarcely practical now. That was also
given in the councils of Nice ' and of Chalcedon.*
' CdDcil. Trident. Sess. xxiv. de Ref. Cap. 11.
^ Concil. German. 1. apud. Labbe T. vl. col. 1555. Concil. Liptin Ibidem col. 1537. Con-
cil. German. Hi. Ibidem col. 15.55.
' Conoil. Rhem. Labbe T. ix. col. 103?. ■» Concil. Paris Ibidem col. 10.50.
5 Concil. Pictav. i. Ibidem col. 1046. Concil. Pictav. 11. Ibidem col. 1078. Concil. Wirtze-
burg. Ibidem col. 385. Concil. Avenion. Ibidem col. 391, &c.
• Const. Apostol. n. 38. ' Concil. Nlc. can. 5. » Concil. Chalcidon. can. 19.
Mm
;.A.: ill' . •ii'^'B^;
V
^^^
i/
,in
A
History of the Diocese.
^JT his vision of heaven, St.
2Tli John saw the triumphant
(^ church of the saints and an-
gels made perfect in count-
less numbers assembled before the
face, of God Almighty. There
stood the twenty-four ancients,
clothed in white robes, with gold-
en crowns upon their heads.
High on the throne of glory sat
the eternal Father. The holy Spir-
it was represented by the seven
lamps ever burning with the fire
of Charity. There also stood the
''Lamb of God slain from the
foundations of the world."' In
their midst were the four living
creatures, which are the symbols of
the four Evangelists, f he book,
the holy Gospel was closed sealed with the seven seals, for no one
but the Lord Jesus could open it, because no one can understand
its meaning unless taught by the church. Then all the members
of that supernal court of God sang a hymn of sweetness and of
gladness to the Lamb of God: *' Who hath made us to our God a
kingdom and priests and we shall reign on earth."*
Such was the first vision given to the beloved apostle in the Isle
of Patmos, when he was banished by the cruel emperor Domitian.
That was the model of the christian church. From the verv be-
ginning of their preaching, the apostles followed that arrangement
which God gave the early church in the vision seen by St. John.
When the apostles established dioceses and churches over all parts
of the world, they introduced the services not only according to
the temple of the Jews the model shown to Moses on the mount,
but also according to the court of heaven St. John saw in the vision.
• Apoc. xlll. 8. * Apoc. V. 10.
an
^
CHRIST IS HEAD OF THE DIOCESE A8 WELL AS OF THE WHOLE CHURCH.
364 THE WORK OF STS. PETER, JAMES AND JOHN".
At Ephesus, where St. John lived the latter part of his life as a
missionary superintending bishop of the churches of Asia Minor,
he formed the services of these churches according to what he saw
in heaven. He was the last of the apostles. For as his Master
foretold he waited till he came. ' In the feablquess of old age he
could not celebrate the Mass with the golden diadem on his head,
as before, nor was he strong enough to preach. Tlien they carried
him into the church each Sunday and feast day, that they might
see him at the celebration of the mysteries. As he passed -along
the rows of worshippers, each knelt to get the blessing of the last
•of the apostolic college, while he repeated to each one: " Little
■children love one another," his whole person beaming with that
love which shines all throughout liis Gospel, for he said love was
the whole law.
Under him the churches of that part of the world were estab-
lished. The other bishops and apostles copied after the services
of the churches of Asia Minor founded by St. John. Tiie people
•of that time were filled with the most extraordinary piety, devo-
tion and good works.
In the mystic meaning of the church, while the nave where the
people sit means the christians, the sanctuary signifies heaven.
As St. John saw the members of the glorious church of heaven
clothed in white garments around the throne of God, so he
formed the services of his churches of Asia Minor according to
the model shown him in his vision. The clergy of these churches
of St. John were vested in white flowing garments, each in the
rank of his orders while attending the holy services. From these
customs introduced by St. John, all the other churches copied,
and from his day to our time the clergy in the sanctuary, and the
altar boys are vested in white garments, the altar and the sanc-
tuary are lighted up with the candles, which but typify the light
of glory of that heavenly churcii, which the beloved apostle saw
in Patmos. Thus while Peter formed the Latin Rite and stamped
his character of universal jurisdiction on the churcli universal, St.
John first gave the form and the peculiar beauties to the diocese,
while St. James composed the Greek Rite, and he was the model
bisiiop. Peter, James and John were the witnesses of the glories of
the Son of God in his transfiguration, when Moses representing the
Jewish Law and El ias personating the Propiiecy of the Old Testa-
ment on Thabor's heights spoke of the Saviour's death. And when
his death approached, the Lord called these three apostles into the
garden witli him, for they were to stamp their character on the
universal church, on the diocese, and on the episcopacy, and on the
Liturgies for all future time.
The people of the apostolic age were filled with the most re-
markable piety, devotion and good works. They often had no
rulers but their bishops and the priests in union with him. ' At
the founding of the church by the preaching of the apostles, the
> John xxi. «i. * Acts. 11. 42, 40, &c.
HOW THE SERVICES WERE FORMED. 365
whole time of the clergy was taken up with the work of the min-
istry. Often the people whom they converted were poor, some of
them even slaves^, owned by cruel pagan masters, and the early
christians had to work hard for their living. It was only later
that the church converted the rich. When not occupied with
their daily labors, they frequently met in church and there recited
the Psalms and canticles of the Bible in praises to the Lord. We
do not find exactly when the services were formed, but the grand
Liturgies, which at least in substance go back to the apostolic days,
were then about forming under the guiding hands of either the
apostles themselves or their converts.
As a great part of the people of the Eoman empire spoke the
Latin language, they soon translated parts of the Scriptures into
that tongue, and later the whole Bible was rendered into that
sweetly sounding language, and it became so well known that even
in the apostolic age it was known as the Vulgate, that is the Latin
for the common Bible. From that day to this the Vulgate
revised by St. Jerome has been the official Bible of the whole
church.
The laity with the clergy took part in reciting the divine offices
of the breviary. St. Cyprian of Carthage tells us how the people
of his episcopal city, not only on Sundays, but even during week
days, came to sing the hours of tierce, sext and none. He says
that they were so numerous that their united voices rose towards
heaven. AVe do not think that the offices were always thus sung
by the laity in the early church, because St. Ambrose tells us that
only after the people had been shut up in his cathedral at Milan
for some days by the soldiers did they learn to sing the offices. '
It seems that the apostles and their disciples first said Mass, recit-
ing the service as we now do at a low Mass, and that only later were
the sacred words sung.
When the people of the early church met for prayer, if they had
no clergymen among them, one of them read parts of the Bible, the
acts of the martyrs, and some of the explanations of the early fath-
ers. When the bishop was present, he explained the part of the
Scriptures read by the reader. * St. Bazil tells us that in Arabia,
Phenecia, Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and Mesopotamia, the people
rose in the night to recite or sing the praises of the Lord. * We
see these ancient rites to-day in the ceremonies of holy week, of
Advent, of Lent and in other ancient ceremonies in the venerable
liturgies, and in the monuments of the apostolic age. The Lit-
urgies of the early church give us an insight into the way the
services were carried out soon after the apostles. The Liturgy of
the Babylonians, composed by St. Thomas, and which his disciples
Sts. Adaeusand Maris wrote down are precisely the same as they came
from their hands. It is said that not a word has been changed. *
The words of consecration and the substantial parts are the very
' Given by Cardinal Newman. ^ Const. Apost. 1. 11. C. 59. Ibidem 27, 57.
' St. Bazil Epist. ccvll. ad Cleros Neoces. n. 3. Thomas Disc. Eccl. T. I.
* See Liturgy of the B. Apostles in Early Liturgies Ante-Nicene Fathers.
366 CHARITIES OF THE EARLY CHRISTIANS.
same in all these ancient Liturgies or services of the Mass, which
among the Orientals is still called " The Mystery."
At these services the people brought their gifts to the church,
and after the Gospel they offered them at tlie altar, on a table
placed within the sanctuary. Hence even to our day this part of
the Mass is called *'The Offertory." The bishop alone was
charged with the administration of the church property. ' One
of the early Popes decided that these gifts should be divided into
four parts — one for the support of the bishop, the other to main-
tain the clergy of the diocese, the third for the expenses of the
church, and the rest for the poor, for the widows and orphans. ^
When the conversion of the emperor Constantine gave peace to
the church, these offerings became more numerous, the christians
began to build more costly churches, to increase the splendors of
divine worship, to erect asylums, hospitals, monasteries, &c. , and to
establish schools for education of both sexes. Then were laid
the foundations of these great charitable and educated works,
which flourish all over the christian vi'orld to-day, where every
misfortune of poor fallen humanity finds a help and a cure. So
many gifts were given, and such valuable property left to the
churches, that in his time St. Ambrose tells us they were enough
for all the poor of his episcopal city, Milan. '
At Jerusalem only, in the apostolic age, the people sold their
goods and gave the price to the church. * As said the law of God
to the Jews, in the following centuries the christians gave the
tenth part of their goods to the church. ' The christians, es-
pecially in Judea, having all worldly goods in common, they lived
like the monks and religious orders of the present time, bringing
the first fruits of the earth and the proceeds of their business to
the church, as the Jews did to the temple under the law
of Moses.
The diocese of Alexandria in Egypt fitted out ships, loaded
with provisions from the historic Nile valley, and sent them to
the christians stricken with famine in the East also appointing a
feneral manager with officers under him to take charge of all such
inds of chaiitable works. Many of the ancient councils speak of
these things. * St. Gregory says that they often rebuilt the walla
of, and repaired the cities of the christians, after they had been
captured and pillaged by pagan enemies. ' At one time the early
christians gave so much to the churches, that the bisiiops com-
plained that they gave too much, but they did not stop but con-
tinued still to give.
In the early church the chapters of the cathedrals were like
courts, before whom the people came to confess their sins, both
in private and in public. The private court for the hearing of
confessions was composed of the bishop himself, and associated
• Const. Apost. n. 37. » GreR. \az. Oral. xUli. in Laud. St. Bazll. n. 63.
' S«Ttn<) Contra Auxent. n. 8. ♦ Acts iv. iM. ;ii. » Const. Apost. L. vll. C. 30.
• (Dncll. Chalce<lon. Sess. xv. Can. 20. Concll. Hiapal. Can. 3. Concil. Toletan. lil. Can. 9.
Concll. Toletan. Iv. Can- 48 Ac- ^ Eplst. v.
THE A.GES OF SAINTS. 367
with him were a number of the chief cathedral clergy, which
formed a court presided over by the bishop. Before this court
came all who wished to go to confession, and openly they con-
fessed, then the court gave them absolution. The public court
of the diocese was also formed of the bishop and the same clergy-
men, and in public they decided the disputes among clergy and
people; and heard cases relating to both temporal and spiritual
matters. The court thus repressed disorders, punished the
guilty, legislated for the diocese, presided at the divine offices of
the church, at the reciting of the breviary, sang in some places
the daily Liturgy, and fulfilled the same duty as the cathedral
chapter of the present time. They called and educated the stu-
dents for holy orders, and in the name of the clergy of the diocese,
the archdeacon presented them to the bishop for holy orders, the
remains of which are still seen in the ordination of the clergy of
our day.
In the apostolic age the diocese was much simpler than it is
now, and there appeared to be a bishop in almost every small city,
as there were no parishes in the country till the fourth century
and in cities till the tenth century. The bishops therefore looked
after the spiritual wants of the people. But the various depart-
ments of the diocese and her offices grew, as the christian nations
and states multiplied, and as the wants of religion required.
At the head of the diocese stood the bishop, daily at the altar
offering the " Mystery," the sacrifice of the Cross, surrounded by
his priests, the creations of his own priesthood. In the cata-
combs, in the forests, or in the deserts, the whole sanctuary was
lighted with the candles, like the vision of heaven which St. Jolm
saw. In the nave below the clergy, were the members of the
church in good standing all following the services in Greek, Lat-
in, &c., for then the laity well knew these ancient tongues as we
know English now. Lower down were the catechumens, that is
the applicants for admission to the church, but who were on pro-
bation and under instruction, while outside the door were the
public sinners, whose crimes, prescribed by the law, prevented
them from entering the church till they had finished their pen-
ances. During the persecutions, which lasted for more than 300
years, all members of the church expected to be put to most
cruel deaths, and they lived most devoted and pious lives. At
their conversion at the hands of the bishops, or of a priest dele-
gated by him for that function, the converts received baptism,,
and on the same day, or soon after, they were confirmed by the-
bishop, and often they also received Holy Communion. On each
Sunday at least, they secretly came to the church, where the bish-
op oflFered up the Mass, which in the Latin speaking peoples was
called the Communion Service, among the Greeks the Eucharist,
that is the Sacrifice of Praise to God, and among the Orientals it
was called " The Mystery." For the first few years, the Mass was
said in the evening after supper, following the example of the
368 HOW EUROPE WAS CONVERTED.
Last Supper of our Lord. In that service the bishop was always
surrounded by the priests of the diocese, his presbytery, who with
him formed one spiritual government. All together with him
they pronounced the words of the Mass. We see the remains of
that ancient custom in the ordination of a priest, who says the
very same words with the bishop ordaining him. There at the
very beginning of the church in all the meetings and services,
the bishop presided at the head of his priests. Sitting on his
■episcopal throne, often erected in the apse of the cathedral, with
them hearing the confessions of clergy and laity, acting as judge
in the disputes of the members of the church and of the clergy,
or sitting on his episcopal throne at Mass and other services, in
the name of Christ he ruled, surrounded by his clergy. The cler-
gy of the city or the priests attached to the cathedral first formed
the chapter or the senate of the diocese in the early church. Be-
fore any important matters could be undertaken by the bishop,
they had first to come before this spiritual legislature to be
passed upon by them. The bishop could veto any measure he
did not like. The catechumens and the pagans, attracted by the
teachings and the beauties of the church, each century approached
nearer the church, till at last all Europe became catholic. Then
christian civilization spread over the known world, and the light
of truth coming from God shone over the world from the Vicar
-of Christ, the Teacher of mankind.
At that time every church was an association of prayer, a char-
itable society, a community for the teaching of men, and a power-
ful organization for the reformation of morals. The central sun
was the Bishop of Rome, who in every age was most zealous and
-active in sending missionaries into every nation of the world.
Thus the ancient saints and monks started from Home, destined
for every part of the then known world, penetrating everywhere
where there were souls to save. The clergy from Rome pene-
trated to every clime, and began to preach the Gospel of the Cru-
ci lied, in the tents and the cabins of the poor, in the streets of the
pagan villages, in every place they could find an audience of
people to hear them. With few exceptions they ended their lives
of suffering and of self-denial by a martyr's death. St, Peter sent
St. Barbara to preach to the people of Milan; priests from Rome
first announced the Gospel to the people living where now stands
the great city of Vienna; St. Remi came from Rome to the city
of Rheims; Lazarus raised from the dead, after being with his
sisters sent adrift to France, and fixed his episcopal residence at
Marseilles, his sister Mary Magdalen passed her days in a cave of a
neighboring mountain; Longinus, who opened the side of Christ
with the spear, evangelized the people of the south of F'rance; St.
Dennis with Rusticusand Eleutherius came and converted the peo-
ple of Laetetia, the ancient name of Paris. From Rome St. Patrick
came to Ireland. Gregory I. sent St. Augustine as first bishop of
Cauterbnry, England, with Paulinas first bishop of Lincoln, and
WHY THE LAITY DO NOT VOTE. 369
Miletus first bishop of London with their thirty followers, sending
them with full powers for the conversion of pagan England. An-
other Pope sent St. Boniface as his legate to Germany, where he
laid the earliest foundations of christian civilization in that na-
tion. Every civilized people and tribe and tongue to-day upon
the surface of our planet who rejoice in liberty and Christianity
are indebted to the church, especially to Roman Pontiffs for the
benefits they enjoy.
The monks and the priests from Rome, when coming to establish
the church among the pagan people of that age found great diffi-
culty. Simple was their way of carrying out the services. ' In
the open air, in the cabins of the poor, in the basilicas or
court houses of the Roman empire, in every place where they
could call the people, there they said Mass, and there they estab-
lished missions. Soon by conversions and by the natural increase
of the populations, the churches they founded, increased and be-
came the parishes. When these parishes or cities grew larger, they
became the seats of the great dioceses of Europe, of Asia or of Africa,
since so famous in past history. The people of that time took a
lively interest in the workings of the church, in the ordinations
of the clergy, even in the consecrations of the bishops, the people
took an active part. Thus we read that the laity took part in the
elections of the Bishops of Rome and in the selection of the other
bishops all over the world. This was the discipline for the first
centuries.
But by the intrigues of designing politicians and by the inter-
ference of the Roman emperors, that concession granted to the
laity was revoked, and the other dioceses of the world following
Rome, soon i^eserved the election of their bishops to the clergy.
Thus an ancient Roman Ritual during an ordination service says
to the laity: "Speak, we cannot hear you if you keep silent. "
St. Cyprian ' gives his reasons for ordaining Saturusa priest. St.
Augustine tells us how he resisted the clamors of the people of
Hippo, who wanted to force him against his will to ordain St.
Pinian. The history of the election of the first Bishops of Rome
shows us the manner of electing the clergy of the first ages.
Excepting the Popes, whose office belonged to the whole world,
the clergy of the early church belonged to the parish or
cathedral for which they were ordained. For that reason the
people know them, as they saw them in the ranks of the lower
clergy waiting on the bishop, as the inferior clergy of the cathe-
dral, or attached to the parish churches, aids and helpers of pastor
of the church of which they frequently became pastors. They were
educated in the house of the bishop or of the pastor, for
there were no seminaries at that time. Pope Sergius first estab-
lished schools, which were enlarged afterwards by Popes Leo HI.
and Sylvester. The ancient councils forbade clergymen to change
from one diocese to another. " At that time the clergy rarely or
* Epist. xxiv. Ad Cler. * Concil. Nic. Can. 16. Sardic. Can. 18. Chalc Can. 20, &c.
370 THE POOK AND THE RICH.
never resigned. And seldom were they deposed from adraister-
ing the sacraments or their titles taken from them. In the early
church the suspension of a priest happened very frequently. It
took place only after open trial before the bishop and the members
of the chapter. They were never tried except for enormous sins,
which shocked the whole church. Such trials took place usually
in a council of the bishops, in the case of an accused bishop, or in
a, synod of the priests if a priest were accused.' Seeing in the clergy,
united to their church and congregations, an image of the union of
Christ with his church universal, that union was only broken by
the death of the clergy, bishop or pastor. As the people chose
and presented to the bishop the candidates for holy orders, as the
clergy and laity of tiie diocese chose their bishop and presented
him to the archbishop, or to the three consecrating bishops, so
these churches or spiritual brides chose their spiritual husbands,
and that ghostly marriage only ceased at death.
Such was the state of the church in Europe while the Homan
empire lasted, up to the time when the barbarians from the North
came down with fire and sword on the sunny plains of Southern
Europe, when they wiped outthe last remainsof pagan Roman civil-
ization. All the laws, literature, letters and customs of pagan civil-
ization fell before the rude attacks of the savage hordes of the Teu-
tonic races. When the captains of these robbers found no more
rich regions to conquer and pillage, they built their castles in the
fairest valleys, or on the strongest natural positions, and then
turned and made war on their neighbors. Then the wealthy
people of all Europe looked to Ireland for the education of their
eons and daughters, while the common people sought the protection
of the bishops and the clergy of the church, who alone had saved
the laws and the literature of Rome from the destruction of the
barbarians.
In the following ages the bishops and the pastors became the judges
and the magistrates of Europe. They gave the peoples and
nations their laws and customs. On the ruins of the Roman
empire, they laid the foundations of a new civilization, differing
from that of destroyed pagan Rome, which had been completely
swept away. Everywhere the clergy of the catholic church became
the fathers of the people. The first work of the church was then
to convert, to reform and to educate this horde of Northern savages,
and to civilize and christianize them. The proud, haughty aris-
tocrats of Europe, being the descendants of these robber-murder
chiefs, they resisted the church more than the common people.
For that reason even to our day the poor .are in the church, which
ever protected them from the rapacity and the slavery of the rich.
Slavery then existed in every part of the world. Those captured
in battle were always sold into slavery.
Above all the Roman church and the diocese of the Pope,
showed herself most anxious for the softening of the rigors and
* ooDcii. Qev-
KISE OF THE TEMPORAL POWER. 371
the gradual suppression of slavery, for the protection of the poor,
for the refining of the manners of the people, for the spread of
learning, for the peace, advancement, and the prosperity of the
church. When Pope Leo I. stopped Attila on his march to Kome,
when Leo requested him to spare the eternal city, no king could
resist him. Then left without a government, without laws, without
any stability of institutions, the people of Eomeand of Italy looked
up to the Pope, as to their protector. Then rose the temporal
power of the Popes, which has existed even to our times, the only
government which goes back 1400 years to the destruction of the
Roman empire, and which was recognized and strengthened by the
great emperors Pepin, Charlemagne, and by all the great rulers of
the world.
After the fall of the Roman empire the Gospel was preached in
the country places. When the monks first taught the rotation
.system of farming, as we have it to-day, then the people became
fixed to the soil. Gradually the church taught them to turn from
robbery, bloodshed and war, and to change their swords into the
instruments of peace. The chief work of the church then was the
conversion of Europe, the reclaiming of the barbarians, and the
civilization of the nations. All Europe, lying in ruins from the
invasions of the barbarians, the only salvation of mankind was
the church, and to the church alone the nations of the world then
looked for their safety, as the civilization of Greece and Rome
had been completely wiped from the face of the earth.
The saviours of society at that time were alone the clergy. Above
all, the Roman Pontiffs, following the example of St. Leo, who
-arrested Attila, gave an example to all the other bishops of the
world. Under the instructions of the Popes, the bishops began
the conversion of the robber princes and their descendants, living in
the castles they had built in the regions they or their fathers had
•conquered and settled, surrounded with their half-civilized and
half-clothed soldiers. Pope Anastasius in his letters to Clovis,
king of France, approved all the good work of bishop Remi in
his instructions and conversion of that king. St. Gregory T. did
the same with the Goths, the Lombards, the English and the Irish.
At Gregory's time first rose the temporal power of the church,
and Pontiffs with all their power who came after him aided the
bishops in their contest with these robber princes. In every coun-
try the legates of the Popes pleaded with the savage, ignorant kings,
and nobles the cause of learning, of literature, of manners and
taught refining morals. In that way they gradually impressed the
Roman civilization on all Europe, and little by little the nations
of that part of the earth received from Rome the religion of
Christ. This was the chief work of the clergy and monks who re-
ceived their constitutions and their foundations from the confirma-
tions of the Popes. Thus in Ireland flourished St. Columba, who
after his exile at lona, formed numerous monasteries according to
the rule of St. Benedict. The cities of Germany were called
372 ORIGIN OF DIOCESAN OFFICERS.
burghs in the mountains and forests where the monks settled. St.
Bruno founded the Great Chartreuse in France. St. Miletus-
founded the monastery of the famous Westminster Abbey in
England, and thus that great and famous monastic institution
became the cradle of the British parliament, which was the model
of all legislative bodies all over the world.
In every place the bishops, the priests and the monasteries
opened schools for the children, colleges for young men and con-
vents for young ladies. As the church grew in numbers dioceses
were formed, archdioceses erected, parishes established all over
Europe, and religion spread. The clergy were mostly chosen from the
higher ranks of the people, and in each nation a national priest-
hood and episcopacy sprung up devoted and loyal to the church
and to the nation. Some of the teacher priests became famous in.
all history, as Miletus and Bede in England, Jerome and Gregory in
Home, Wilfred, St. Thomas Bernard, &c. Slavery then extended
all over Europe as human ownership is the remains of pigan
times. The rich oppressed the poor, the strong ground the weak
the nobles sometimes treated the people as cattle. The rich and
powerful often lived in splendid idleness, their only occupation
robbery, war and bloodshed, while the poor labored in hovels built
under the shadows of the castles. In these early ages the clergy,
the monks, the priests and bishops were the only protectors of
society. The poor fled to the protection of the clergy, the bishop's
homes, the churches and the monasteries became the asylums of the
oppressed. Whence the people crowded around these ecclesiastical
institutions, and in a short time populous towns grew up around
these church foundations, till in time they beaine great cities.
As the population grew, parishes were established, which were
attended by the monks or by regular clergy from the monastery.
At last what was only a forest when they came, later became the
seat of a bishop. For that reason most of the bishops of Europe
at first came from Rome, while the second generation of bishops
and clergy were chosen from the native clergy of the monasteries.
As the clergy grew to be more numerous, duties were as.signed to
each. Then divine service and the church functions belonging to
each order were marked out for each, so there would be no con-
fusion. In episcopal ceremonies, they reserved all the duties of
the deaconate to the archdeacon, and as time went by he became
the vicar-general or the natural aid and lieutenant of the bishop.
For that reason in the early church, he fulfilled the office and place of
the vicar-general in many parts of the church. The archpriests,
provosts, priors and other officers of the church were established
as the needs of religion required. As the parish grew in import-
ance and in numbers, their pastors became more and more prom-
inent in the diocese, and the bishops consulted them in ruling and
in making important changes in the diocese. From that in the
lapse of centuries, rose the cathedral chapters in every diocefie,
copied after the constitution of the Roman diocese.
374 ORIGIN" OF THE CHRISTIAN NATIONS.
As certain princes became by force of arms, by diplomacy, or by
other means more powerful than the others, they at last became
the ruling house, and they thus gave the kings and rulers to their
nation. This was the origin of all the ruling families of Europe.
As the clergy had rights given them by Eome, by which the bish-
ops could not oppress them, as Rome ever followed her constitu-
tion in dealing with bishops, so the laity soon copied after the
church and founded civil courts after the manner of the Eomans,
as the church taught them law or order when the Roman empire
had fallen before the barbarians. In this way civil courts were
founded all over Christendom. The settlement of disputes be-
tween man and man came before these tribunals, and the rulers of
Christendom were forced by the church to listen to the people, and
and to give the people their rights. Many of the clergy wlien or-
dained brought their property to the church and gave it to the
diocese when they died. Frequently rich families, when they had
no heirs, left all their riches to the church. In this way the
churches became rich and powerful, to uphold the trampled rights
of the people, to educate the masses, found colleges and universi-
ties and to christianize all Europe.
After a thousand years had passed by, the feudal system of the
nobility and the poor, the castle and the cabin were found side by
side. The remains of the fallen Roman empire had been converted,
civilized and educated. All else of the ancient world had went
down before the incursions of the barbarians, but the church
alone had survived the shock, and she came forth from the ruins
of the ancient levelled destroyed world, more beautiful, more perfect
than before. She turned a'.id reformed the modern iiations
coming from these ruins, but they were christians, not pagans.
Above the kingdoms of the earth rose the church, the mother of
them all. Then the Popes were the fathers of rulers and of na-
tions. For that reason the nations of the middle ages gave to the
Popes authority to settle disputes. The people called on the
Popes when their rulers oppressed them. Therefore we read that
tlie Bishops of Rome deposed kings and princes, for the Roman
court formed a court of arbitration in the disputes between king-
doms and peoples. During these times, called the middle ages,
there were many wars but moderated by the ** truce of God," the
sufferings, the carnage and all the ills of conquest and of in-
vasion were avoided, for the church forbade wars and the Popes
were the supreme courts for the settlements of disputes among
nations. Many of the foremost statesmen of that time were
monks, priests or bishops, and they guided the destinies of the
chief governments of Europe, during the age when few men were
educated. Thus history gives us the example of St. Thomas a
Becket, prime minister of England, before lie became the great
archbishop of Canterbury, of Suger, Abbot of St. Dennis, Paris,
prime minister of the king of France before he began to rebuild
the monastic church of St. Dennis, of Cardinals Richelau, Maza-
RISE OF CON^STITUTIONAL GOVERNMENTS. 375
rini, and all the great statesmen of the chief European governments
who stepped down from the ranks of the clergy to guide the ship
of state in troublous times.
The church consecrates the Pope and the Pontiff, that they may
like Aaron and Moses rule the people of God with judgment and
•equity. She consecrates the king, she enthrones the emperor as
the prophet anointed Saul, David and Solomon, that the spiritual
may bless the temporal, for the spiritual cliurch ever sanctifies
and completes the temporal. For that reason every king or rifler
of the middle ages was crowned and consecrated by the bishops or
by the Popes.
In the days of feudalism, that is when the nobles and the poor
lived in the relation of master and worker, rather when a few
aristocrats owned the people under them and kept them almost
as slaves, then the church fought the rich and powerful. She
gained the rights of the poor. She forced from the rich and the
powerful, the concessions which the people enjoy to-day. For we
must remember that in those early days the common people were
sometimes oppressed by pagan princes more than the people of Rus-
sia are oppressed to-day. There was not a constitutional govern ment
on tlie face of the earth at that time. The government of the
■church alone was the constitutional government, from which the
nations copied in the middle ages. Right then took the place of
might, till the church forced kings and rulers to give the people
of the European nations justice and right, and if the people of the
world to-day have their rights they are indebted to the church
for them. It is true that the fight for their rights was long and
bitter. Even to our day the lies and the slanders which wicked men
heaped on the church, still live in the minds of the children of
those who fought her, still the world is getting to know and realize
that the church was right.
From the tenth century, the church, having recovered from the
evils arising from the incursion of the barbarians by the complete
conversion of their children, soon she began to refine and civilize
them.
At that time the kings of the christian nations claimed as a
right what was only a concession or a privilege, that is the presen-
tation of the bishops and of the pastors of the church. The Roman
See alone has the right of naming the bishops of the universal
•church, as the bishops alone have the right of appointing the pas-
tors of the diocese. When Henry IV. of Germany came to the
throne of the most powerful empire upon the earth, he claimed
the right of naming the bishops to the vacant thrones of dioceses,
and of appointing to the vacant parishes the men whom he wanted,
or the clergy who gave him the most money. This sin was the
crime of simony so called from Simon Magus who offered money
to St. Peter. It had spread into many parts of the church, and
dioceses and parishes were suffering fiom the unworthy heads
forced on them by civil rulers. This was the condition of things.
376 GREGORY VII. AND HENRY IV.
when the great Hildebraiid under the name of Gregory VIL
came to the throne of Peter. He determined at once to reform
this abuse, which was poisoning the church in its very root and
foundation, the clergy and pastorate. The powerful Henry
fought the Pope. He invaded Italy. He declared war against
the Pope, and the latter was obliged to fly from Rome. For
years the fight continued. The great Pope was broken down in
health by his fights for the purity of the clergy and for the rights of
the church, he found a refuge and asylum in the fortress of Can-
osa. Here at last came Henry IV. of Germany to make peace-
with him, when he found he could not fight that spiritual power
the church. Standing at the door, the emperor sent up word
to the tottering, feeble Pope saying that he wanted to speak with
his Holiness. Gregory VII. sent word, that if he wanted to see
him he should stand three days and three nights barefooted in
the snow before the door of the monastery before he could see
his Holiness. And Henry stood, thus penitent, before his army,
and in the eyes of all his court, and there he made peace with the
church. From that day the church is free in the appointment and
the dismissal of the clergy. No civil power can claim the right of
interfering with the election of Popes, bishops or pastors of the
church. That is the meaning of the words: " Going to Canosa."
Then opened the greatest religious epoch of the church. In every
city of the christian world, she built a cathedral which Sundaj's
and holidays could not hold the multitudes of people who crowded
there to worship God. The bishop presided, surrounded by hi&
clergy. The kings and members of royalty sat within the sanct-
uary, for the church granted this privilege to honor the law and
to bless the government in their persons. The lofty vaulted naves
and aisles re-echoed with the grand and stately strains of the plain
chant, the solemn music of the church. The entire people took
part in the congregational singing. The voice of the people rose
towards heaven as a mighty sound. That Latin service was in the
language of Rome, the chief liturgy which the church had treas-
ured and rescued from the remains, of the mighty Roman em-
pire, which centuries before had been blotted from the face of the
earth. In the cathedral cities of England, we find still standing
to-day the great cathedrals built in the time of which wo write, but
now silent and abandoned monuments of the ages of faith, be-
fore the political rage and the spiritual delirium of the reformation
tore from the heart of the English people that catholic religion,
which had flourished among them from the preaching of St.
Augustine in 492. Now but a small wing of these cathe-
drals holds the protestant people, children of noble catholics of
England, who built them. There you find the sanctuary where
the clergy sat surrounding their bishop, the nave where the people
heard Mass, often closed from the sanctuary by the chancel screen,
the charter house for the meeting of the senate of the diocese, the
cathedral chapter, the bishop's house, the cloisters for the monks.
FOUNDING THE GREAT SCHOOLS. 377
ihe buildings for the convent and monastic schools, and the build-
ings for the whole machinery of the complete diocese. The Eng-
lish church was one of the noblest daughters of the universal
church, before the bad king Henry VJII. persecuted and put to
death the bishops, priests and monks of the Ens^lish church, and
appointed laymen in their place, such as we see in the English Prot-
estant church of to-day.
As the church then enjoyed peace, she could give her wliole
attention to the work of converting and saving souls. The clergy
were found in every walk of life, at the head of every public move-
ment for the advancement of the race. They established schools
and colleges in every land. They laid the foundations of the great
universities of Oxford, of Cambridge, of Paris, of Salmanca, of
Freiberg, of Rome, and of every seat of learning. No work
was begun without the blessing of the priest. More than 1^0,000
students each year flocked to Paris to attend the great univei'sicy.
The other universities were as nearly well attended. The priest pro-
fessors opened their classes in every department with the prayers,
and all great works were undertaken with the blessings of the
priests who were the leaders of men. There in the Uiiiversity of
Paris, Albert the Great taught St. Thomas, there Abelard delivered
his lectures, which opened the way for the rationalism of our day
till he was condemned by the Bisliop of Rome.
In the country and in the little villages which grew up with the
settlement of Europe, the missionaries labored till they had founded
parishes, built parish churches, established monasteries and schools
to educate the people. By the lapse of ages these little hamlets
grew into cities, great and famous in history. In Ireland the or-
iginal people were patriarchal in their habits, living on their flocks.
They had no cities till the Danes came and conquered certain parts
where they built cities. The whole Irish nation was divided into
-certain districts or counties, which the people owned in common, and
where they pastured their flocks. The people of each section were
related either by descent or by blood, and they elected their chief.
This was the origin of the counties of Ireland. This is why the
people from each county have a peculiar affection for those who come
from the same neighborhood or county. A number of councies
formed a province, over which reigned a king elected by the chiefs.
Over all kings, chiefs and people ruled the monarch of all Ireland.
This was the state of society in that country when in 432 St. Patrick,
sent by Pope Celestine, come to convert the Irish to the faith.
When in the rest of Europe the clergy had converted the nobles,
children of the robber chieftains, who had generations before
destroyed the Roman empire, the clergy established chapels in their
castles. That gave rise to the discipline of the private chapel.
Rome made laws relating to the services held in these private chap-
els of the nobility so they would not interfere with the regulations
of the parish Mass. The nobility had their chaplains. They were
often the tutors of their children. To the clergv were the nobles
378 DIRECTED BY THE MOTHER CHURCH,
indebted for their education, their manners, their social culture and
their breeding. When they were at war with their neighboring
chiefs, the church was frequently built under the walls of the castle,
as a protection against robbers, or on a high rock, as we see in the
examples of the churches near the castles of central Europe, in
the monasteries of the Orient, in Cormack's chapel on the rock
of Cashel, Ireland and in numerous other examples of Europe.
Religion then penetrated intoevery fibre of social life. The kings
sometimes recited the breviary, or they became honorary members
of the cathedral chapter, the brightest sons of the nobles entered
the ranks of the clergy.
The discipline of the diocese gradually changed from age to age.
The stations in private houses became parish churches, the clergy
of the city took part in the episcopal ceremonies, the cathedral
clergy replaced the ancient presbytery, the clergy of the bishop's
household became the cathedral chapter, the pastors ruled by rigiit
of office and not as vicars of the bishops, and Rome defined in
canon law the movements of that vast organization, the church
the body of Christ. Many disputes rose relating to the rights of
certain members of the clergy in the same orders. Tiie limits of
authority and the places of all those, and the dealings between the
bishops and the parish priests were defined by the councils, or they
were referred to Rome for the decision of the Pontiff. These decis-
ions forever regulated the standing of each office. From time to
time the Roman Pontiffs gave decrees relating to these functions,
and these decisions explained the canon law, which regulates
the movements of every officer and clergyman belonging to that vast
army of the cliurch, in its most minute details. The eyes of the
whole world turned to Rome and to her Bishop in all their disputes.
The Roman diocese of Peter was the model for all the other
dioceses of the world. From the Lateran church, where the Pope
lived for a thousand years, the Mother of the churches of the world,
came the mighty impulsions which moved and formed the other
diocese and brought order into every rank and file of the other
parishes and dioceses. In her seven cardinal bishops, her cardinal
priests and deacons, her twelve canons, her archpriest and arch-
deacon, in her rites and ceremonies, in her unchanging customs
they heard the voice of God the Son, and saw the image of the Holy
Ghost. The world copied these till the constitutions of the Popes,
their diocese and cathedral gave a constitution to all the churches,
parishes and dioceses of the world, born of her their Mother at their
erection. The Popes with their senator cardinals had direct juris-
diction over each and every cathedral, church and parish of the
world. That was the doctrine of every church even before it was
defined by the Vatican council. ' Thus we read that St. Leo IX.
visited Besancon, and that the members of the two chapters of its
double cathedral met under his presidency as had been done before
by Pope Calixtus I.
' CoDcll. Vat. Sess. Iv.
THE SENATE OF THE DIOCESE. 379
In that age the chapters of the cathedrals all over the world were
divided into three ranks, following the example of the cardinal
bishops, priests and deacons of the Roman church. The canons of
the diocese living at and attached to the cathedral represented the
seven cardinal bishops of Rome, the clergy of the city parishes or
pastors of the city represented the cardinal priests, pastors of Rome,
while the country pastors, who became by right of pastorate, or
who had been made honorary members of the chapter, represented
the cardinal deacons of the Roman diocese. As all matters of im-
portance came first before the chapter of the diocese, so the execu-
tion of its decrees belonged to the bishop, as the governor and the
president in the United States are the executors of the laws. So
in every diocese the bishop had his archpriest, liis vicar-general, his
archdeacon, or his legate, to execute his decrees and the decrees of
the chapter. As the needs of the church grew by the natural growth
of its members, or by conversions, so the church offices grew, till
at last the perfect diocese rose on the foundations of the mission,
the parish, the missionary diocese or the vicar apostolic. Thus we
see the perfect diocese existed with her own bishop, her chancery
office, vicar-general, cathedral chapter of canons, &c., and they were
formed m all the dioceses of central Europe during the latter part
of the middle ages before the reformation.
The thirteenth century appears to be the golden epoch of the
middle ages. Then flourished the great writers of the church. St.
Thomas codified all the writers of the world from the ancient
Greeks to his teacher Albertus Magnus, and he gives us the
substance of the learning of the race in his wonderful codifications.
Before him flourished St. Bernard the model of the monk and tiie
man of the world, who ruled nations, regulated society, saved the
church from a schism by a dispute about the chair of Peter, and
wrote the sweetest works of later times. We must not pass by St.
Bonaventure of the Franciscans, or Abelard teaching rationalism
at the university of Paris, till condemned by the Bishop of Rome.
He was the father of modern rationalism or the right of reason to
examine all the works of God and reject what we do not under-
stand.
At that time the church had converted the remains of the Roman
empire. The Turks were knocking at the gates of Constantinople.
The Moors had captured the fairest parts of Spain. The followers
of Mohammed had wiped out the church in Arabia, Asia Minor,
Egypt, Syria. Europe was threatened by the Saracens, The
nations of Christendom looked to the Pope their christian father
to save christian civilization from utter destruction. Peter the
Hermit was preaching the Crusades. The religious orders wei-e
doing a wonderful work. A schism devastated parts of the church.
Kings and princes ceased to hear her teachings. Europe was torn
by cruel wars, when the voice of the Roman Pontiff cried out call-
ing them to save Europe from the invasions of the Turks, the infidel
followers of Mohammed. Then rose the cry of saving the Holy
380 ORIGIN OF CHURCH LIVINGS.
Sepulchre of our Lord from the despoiling profanations of the
Saracens. '^L'hat turned the attention of warlike European peoples
to Jerusalem. The latter city was captured, Godfrey de Bullion the
first christian king refused to wear a royal crown in the city where
our Lord wore a crown of thorns. Often the priests imposed as pen-
ance on sinners an obligation of going to Jerusalem. They enjoined
it especially on those guilty of great sins, and the holy city was filled
with pilgrims from every land. Such was the height of perfection
to which the church had elevated society, that all Europe appeared
peopled with saints, and the foundations of the civilization of our
modern society were laid so deep, that we are reaping the benefits of
the work of the church even in our days.
The first parishes, having been founded by the monks and by
priests who lived together in the monastic community life, that
custom continued in Europe down till almost modern times. Some
of the clergy of the cathedrals lived together as regular canons.
They ate at the same table with the -bishop, aud they had their
living from the common fund. When the rich died childless and
left their wealth to the churches, at later times each diocese or
parish church had a certain revenue. Later, parts of this revenue
called benefices were divided among the clergy. Even in our time
they are called benefices or livings in the church of England. In
the Episcopal church in England to-day they are sold or given by
the nobility to the highest bidders. To such a degree of corruption
has the noble English church fallen, since England fell away from
theauthority of the Roman Pontiffs, who alone receive power from
Christ to heal the wounds of society and to keep the sheepfold of
Christ pure and undefiled. Even in our time and country the
people of other churches call their ministers, and they dismiss
them at will, and give them the salary they think they earn by their
eloquence and popularity. Thus church salaries and ecclesiastical
livings outside the catholic church have degenerated into wordly
professions.
When benefices were established in the 13th century, the com-
mon monastic life of the canons of the cathedral ceased, and
they met only at stated times, or at the call of the chairman as
members of the same corporation. The clergy of the great cathe-
dral churches separated, the cloister regulations ceased, the great
dining rooms were found only in the colleges and seminaries,
the clergy slept no more in large dormitories as before, the offices
of the breviary were not sung by the chapters in the cathedrals,
the reformation disturbed Christendom and the discipline of this
age was introduced.
Up to the times before the reformation the canons of the ca-
thedrals lived as monks. They now lived as secular priests and the
monastic customs were abandoned. At this epoch, the wliole
discipline of the middle ages relaxed, not only in the cathedrals
but also in the monasteries and convents. Lent was not kept
with such rigors as before, the nuns mitigated their rules, the
THE BISHOP AND CHAPTER. 381
clergy and laity relaxed their austerities of the body, and the church
mitigated the harsh customs of the former ages. The mildness
of Kome spread over the world. The knowledge of the
eacred rights of man became better known. The church be-
gan to accommodate herself to the changing opinions, peculiari-
ties and the modern customs and beliefs of mankind. The clergy
mixed up more with the laity and the laity better knew them.
But the clergy of the religious orders did not change their rules.
They regulated and modified the most rigorous discipline, and they
eubmitted their rules to the Roman Pontiff, to whom alone
they belonged. Because of their regular lives and customs, they
were called the regular clergy, while the clergy who belonged to the
different dioceses, and who as pastors gave themselves up to the
salvation of others, because they lived separated in the world from
those they preached to, they are known as secular clergy. Only
those ordained to the priesthood had charge of souls. The lower
clergy took part in the divine office, they looked after the poor, the
orphans, and took charge of the temporal matters of the churches.
They were appointed to these offices by the bishop, with and by
the consent of thechapter, or the senate of the diocese. At first the
chapter and the bishop were one. But by the lapse of the ages, they
separated, and each had the proper functions belonging to them
by law, and whicli the others could not invade, somewhat like the
president and the senate of the United States, and other civil offi-
ces in our country. That there might not be any conflict of author-
ity, the Roman Pontiffs regulated the relations of the bishops with
their chapters, and the Popes defined the rights and limits of
each authority. There was but one authority in the diocese. But it
came from one episcopal throne in two streams, through the bish-
op, or through the chapter to the clergy and people of the diocese.
When disputes rose between the bishop and the chapter, the
Roman Pontiff was the judge, and his decision was final, because
he as the Vicar of Christ has direct authority over the whole church
of Christ.
The archpriest or archdeacon of the diocese, being like the vicar-
general, one authority with the bishop, he did not belong to the
cathedral chapter. The bishop was not the chairman of the chap-
ter, as the president or governor are not members or chairman of
the senate. The vicar-general, archpriest and archdeacon, were ap-
pointed to execute or carry out the orders of the bishop, when these
orders had been passed by the chapter and signed by the bishop.
The clergy having belonged to and having been raised up from
the ranks of the laity, they worshipped in the church to which they
ministered, the clergy belonged to the parish and all knew them.
They were not therefore strangers to the people to whom they min-
istered. When the clergy changed from the regular to the secular
life, at the division of the benefits, when they no longer lived a
community life, then the people and the clergy became more
united. The bishops and pastors having charge of souls, had as-
PECULIAR CUSTOMS. 383
sistants to work in their place, while they sometimes spent the
most of their time away from their charges. That abuse was re-
formed by the council of Trent, which forbade bishops to live away
from their dioceses. From that rose the custom of having assist-
ant priests and assistant bishops, or as they are called vicars and
curates. In England the names were reversed. For the word cu-
rate or cure in French means one having the cure, that is the care
of souls. Those having the care of souls are attached or united
by a spiritual marriage to their parishes or dioceses, while the as-
sistants aid them in their charges. When towards the end of the
middle ages, pastors of large parishes got others to assist them,
then rose the custom of ordaining priests asassistants, who had no
care of souls, but who belonged to the whole diocese. After some
time they did not ordain the clergy for their particular church, as
in the early ages, but they ordained them for the diocese. This
the bishops do at the present time. When these priests have ex-
ercised the ministry for some years as assistants, they are ap-
pointed pastors. But bishops were never consecrated without a
title. For the episcopal office has better preserved the dignity of
the apostolic age. When a bishop was consecrated as assistant
bishop, or to rule a diocese as coadjutor to another infirm bishop,
he receives as his title one of the ancient dioceses among the
infidels.
The ancient customs having changed, it came to pass in mod-
ern times that a clergyman can resign his benefice, his charge of
souls, his parish, into the hands of his bishop, which could not be-'
done in early ages. But no one can resign unless to his superior,
the pastor into the hands of the bishop of the diocese, the bishop
into the hands of the Pope. But the Pope, having as his supe-
rior only Christ, he can resign as Pope Celestine did. From
the frequent resignation of the clergy rose the custom of mov-
ing from one diocese to another, which became so common
that it became an abuse. Thus we read that the canons of the
cathedral of Toledo, Spain became canons of Lincoln, England,
and that the priests of one diocese in this country often left and
went to other dioceses. The legislation of the third council of
Baltimore made strict rules to renew the ancient canons. But
the laws of missionary countries laid down by Eome for this
country directed the clergy to take an oath that they would not
leave their own diocese. But these laws perhaps were required for
the countries settled by emigrants from all parts of Europe,
for their priests naturally followed their people into exile to attend
to their spiritual necessities. Thus we see that the first clergy of
America, of Australia, of India and countries settled by the Eng-
lish speaking race were Irish, for these countries received the
faith from the Irish emigrants.
When the French Popes lived for seventy years at Avigne, France,
there they had the usual revenues of their estates. They invested
many of the bishops of other dioceses with the dignity of the car-
384 ORIGIN OF PEOTESTANTISM.
dinalate of the Roman church, and they incorporated the lower
clergy of other dioceses into the Roman diocese, so they might de-
rive a revenue from other dioceses and from the livings and
benefices of these rich churches. That was the beginning of the
custom of making the clergy of other dioceses members of the dio-
cese of Rome. Thus the acts of the Pontiffs at that time is felt
for the good of the church even in our day. For from that time
the brightest and best of the clergy of the world, became members
of the apostolic college of cardinals. Thus every people and na-
tion can have a voice in the election of the Pontiff through their
cardinal.
The diocese and religious orders became very rich during the
middle ages, and the bishops and superiors of these orders were the
administrators of this wealth. In the hands of the church it
was the property of Christ and of the poor, when the reformation,
like a destructive flood swept over the north of Europe. Covetous
for the wealth of churches and monastic institutions, the bad kings
and corrupt nobles raised an insurrection against the clergy, and
put them to death, or drove them from the country. They seized
these rich estates of the church and stole the property of the
clergy. From that date they began to lie about the clergy and to
paint them in the blackest light, so as to poison the minds of the
laity against their priests, so that they could confiscate their rich
possessions. That was the origin of the calumnies and prejudices,
■which have lived in the minds of the Protestant people for gener-
ations, and only in our day are they finding out, that by bad designing
warfare their fathers were driven from the church their mother.
Then in all the northern countries of Europe, the property of the
church was stolen, and the ancient catholic faith of the people of
the catholic church was driven out. Feeling the want of some re-
ligion, still keeping a part of the christian religion, they had received
from the teachings of the church, these people founded other systems
of religious belief, or organized churches on the foundations of the
catholic teachings, their fathers had received during the thousand
years when all Europe was catholic, and when a Protestant church
did not exist. Thus the difference between Protestants and Cath-
olics consists in this, that while the Catholic church holds all the
revelation made by God to man, the Protestant churches have
only a part and their belief is fragmentary. The church has all
truths which Protestant churches hold and more, but they are
known under a different name.
Thus, coming from a Protestant church into a catholic church,
one has not to reject anvthing which is true that he learned in the
Protestant churcn, but lie holds all and believes with a little more
added to it, then he is a catholic. From the days of the reforma-
tion, when the church received such a shock, the English speaking
clergy had to devote their time to saving the few souls left to them.
They could not give much attention to writing. For that reason,
the English literature of the church is very poor compared to the
ORIGIN OF PROTESTAIS^TISM. 385
great riches of the church in Latin, French, Italian, German, &c.
In reality the literature of the church by far exceeds all the books
ever written on any other subject in all languages. But we see
little of these great works unless we go into the other languages.
When impiety, fanaticism and irreligion, roused by the reforma-
tion, tore peoples from the bosom of their mother, the Holy Spirit
roused St Ignatius at Manresa to found his order for the combat-
ting of Protestantism. Before this Pope Innocent had seen Sts.
Francis and Dominic upholding the shaken Lateran church the
cathedral of the world. Then rose the Jesuits and many other
religious orders, and likewise the great sisterhoods. The divine
Spirit appeared to be poured out upon the world in greater meas-
ure than even in the apostolic age. The invention of printing, the
spread of commerce, the discovery of America, the attacks and de-
fence of different revealed truths, the proclaiming of infallibility, all
combined to the spread of religion and to the strengthening of the
bonds of unity. In our day the world is becoming one. The
greatest minds of men are turning to the church, looking to her
for relief from the wounds of sin and ignorance.
The reformation of manners, and the changes of modern times
are felt even in the religious orders, in the clergy as well as among
the laity. The rights of man to life, liberty and happiness,
in the political sense spreads over the world. The self inflicted
tortures of the middle ages have given away to the bowing down
of the will, to the obedience of the religious orders, and to the
submitting of the mind to the teachings of the church. The altar
boys have taken the place of the lower clergy, under the direction
of the council of Trent. The ancient rites and ceremonies are
better understood by our congregations; the modern music and
the plain chant live side by. side in the choir and in the chancel;
the church has harnessed to its use the press, that modern, tremen-
dous power for good or evil first turned against her; the English
speaking race spreads over the earth, bringing the catholic Irish
with them. The telegraph, the mails, the steamships, the telephone
are uniting mankind. Business enterprise penetrates all nations,
and on the wings of modern progress in triumph, rides the church
coming with her words of peace and salvation to all men. Never
before had the church such a prospect before her. Never before
was she so united within and so admirable without. Now the
attention of the human mind is attracted by her beauty, her teach-
ings, and her most wonderful unity and discipline.
No longer are the offices ot the breviary sung in the churches,
as in the days of yore, but the vespers, the high Mass, the episco-
pal ceremonies, the beautiful rites of the church still remain to
remind us of the early ages. When the church shall have again
for the third time converted Europe, when the errors of the re-
formation will have been cleared up, the church in triumph
shall again enter her grand cathedrals, in England, in Scotland
and in all the north of Europe, and from the Pacific to the Atlantic,
386 ORIGIN OF PROTESTANTISM.
from the Hudson Bay to the Cape of Horn, from the straits of Gib-
raltar to the shores of China, the daily offices will be sung in all
our cathedrals, and anew the poems of praise and of gladness will
rise to Christ the King of glory, for his greatest victory over error
and over all the powers of hell.
Never in the history of the church were so many religious or-
ders of men and of women working for the good of mankind as at
the present time. There every soul can find repose and an outlet
for zeal of every kind, and fully gratifying their desire for the
good of their fellow man. The church is gradually repairing the
wounds of human nature made by the fall of Adam, and the times
of peace prophesied by the sages, and foretold by the prophets
come to pass. The Roman diocese, to which these great religious
orders belong, foster them and guard them from the encroach-
ments of the other churches. When they are persecuted in one
place, according to the words of our Lord, they fly to other places,
and there they still continue their work for the benefit of their fel-
low man.
When fifty years had passed after the rise or the revolt of
Protestantism against the church, the fanaticism started by Luther
had made no headway. The council of Trent then reformed the
morals of the laity, the lives of the clergy, and re-established the an-
oint discipline of the church, in these matters where they had fal-
len away from the normal given by the Roman Pontiffs. The
children of the once catholic peoples after the reformation estab-
lished numerous Protestant churches, each man and woman by
the so called right of interpreting the Bible to suit themselves
made each man his own Pope, and by the lapse of 300 years scarce-
ly a vestige of religion remains in the Protestant churches. In our
day every doctrine is attacked and the rising generation have not
the faith of their fathers. Now is the age of infidelity, when
every teaching, even the very existence of God and his creation
are attacked. When the Protestant churches were tottering with
their own frailty, the church again comes to the rescue to save
the race from the utter horrors of infidelity. Then our great
writers tackled infidelity and saved religion.
This is the state of religion at the present time, when the church
has come forth from her last and greatest fight, first with Arianism,
later with Protestantism and then with infidelity. Now she lifts
her glorious head, crowned with the Holy Spirit. She raises it
aloft above the waters of every system of modern and of ancient
times, and she calls all people into the fold and rescues them
from the floods of error sweeping over the human mind. Now
begins her greatest conquests. Now she is united. No more
can the bishops of France or of any other country proclaim their
independence of the Holy See. No Luther now can hide behind
the excuse of calling a general council to examine his errors, and
still keep poisoning the mind of man before the council can be
called. The decisions of the Bishop of Rome will be heard at
ORIGIN OF PROTESTANTISM. 387
once and flashed under the ocean, teaching the nations the revealed
matters of faith, and the ways of daily life as revealed in the
Bible, and contained in holy traditions. He is the teacher of things
relating to the faith and morals of mankind. The walls of the
heavenly Jerusalem have now been firmly built, its streets are
covered with the gold of everlasting truth, its buildings, pearls of
purity are finished, the decree of the infallibility has made it im-
pregnable. Now let the gentiles rage, and let the kings devise
new things, the church has come out triumphant and glorious
from every contest, her march from now forward will be more
glorious than in any of the ages of the past.
fHE diocese has all the spiritual perfections of the universal
church its mother from which it was born. As the Son
lives in the Father, as the universal church lives in Christ
her head, in the same way the particular churches, the
diocese and parish live in the univ-ersal church.
But now we begin to see the imperfections of creatures. The
dioceses are not immortal like the universal church. Only one,
the diocese of Rome, is immortal, indestructible, eternal. Ronie
is everlasting because of its peculiar and remarkable relation with
the universal church, of which it is the centre and the heart.
Thus while other dioceses may fail, while their people may lose
the faith, while their sees may be overturned by wars or be wiped
out by conquest, the diocese of Rome alone stands, eternal, inde-
"FEED MY LAMBS'
FEED MY SHEEP."— JOHN XXI, 16-17.
390 WHY ROME IS THE ETERNAL CITY.
struct! ble, immortal, because it is upheld by the power of the Son
of God, whose Vicar is the bishop of tliat central Roman diocese.
Thus we read that all the old dioceses founded by the apostles, or
by their successors, fell away and died, while the See of Peter,
the Eoman diocese alone rises above the ruins of the ancient
world, still she holds aloffc its head the Papacy in all its strength,
beauty and indestructibility. Where is the diocese of Hippo, the
chair of the great St. Augustine? Where is ancient Carthage the
see of St. Cyprian? Where is the archdioc^e of St. Mark at
Alexandria? Where is Epiiesus the diocese of Timothy and the
house of St. John? The schismatic or half pagan Copts are the
remains of the once flourishing christian church of Egypt, where
for centuries every apostolic virtue bloomed and in the Nile valley
flourished. Where is Cesarea the church of the great St. Bazil?
From the destruction of Jerusalem under Titusand Vespasian, when
not a stone was left upon a stone, as foretold by the prophets and
by our Lord, when the very site of the holy city was plowed and
sowed, to the beginning of the IV. century, the very name of
Christ was blotted from the see of St. James. ^Elia was the name
of Jerusalem till Helena, Constantine's sainted mother found
the holy site of Calvary and there restored again the worship of
the living God. Again the Moliammedans, the Saracens laid waste
the great apostolic cities, and again the lines of the bishops of the
apostolic sees were broken. Alone amid the ruins of the ancient
world the See of Peter stood, and still she stands to our day, the only
direct Apostolic See. Her Bishops alone go back in an' unbroken
line to the days of her first Pope Peter. Was not this the work of holy
Providence carr3'ing out the words of Christ to Peter: *' on this rock
I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail
against her. " ' The ancient sees of the apostles have perished
from the earth. War, conquest, famine, infidelity have done
their work. The apostolic dioceses now live only in the persons
of their titular bishops, who rule other churches in the name of
the Pope, as vicars apostolic, as assistant bishops, or they live
attached to the congregation of Rome aiding the Pope in his uni-
versal government of the church.
How history has proved the words of the Lord to Peter that he
was to be the rock of eternity. In the Chaldean language spoken
by our Lord and probably by Adam, as well as in neaiTy all the
ancient tongues, Peter means the Rock the Stone. And that
Peter, that Rock, came to Rome and there became the foundation
Stone of the universal church. His body still rests under the
great St. Peter's church as the corner stone of that greatest tem-
ple built to the worship of the true God. On that Rock, that is
on Peter and on his successors, the Lord built his church and
against them the gates of hell will never prevail.
While Rome has stood, while the diocese of Peter never waved
in the faith, the other dioceses have not been as immovable in
> Matb. zvl. 19.
CHKIST HEAD OF THE KOMAN DIOCESE. 391
truth. The great christian churches of other lands may fall away
from the religion of Christ, such as Canterbury, Jerusalem, Con-
stantinople, Cappadocia, Alexandria, Antioch, &c., because of
the sins of the people, or because of the secret designs of God
which we cannot now understand, but the church universal with
its central diocese Rome will last forever, to show the truth of the
prophecy of Christ. Thus the Roman diocese is upheld from on
high, for its head its sumit is crowned by the Person of Christ the
Son of God himself. It has withstood the greatest onslaughts
that any government has ever met, and lived, and still it stands
the only institution which binds modern times with the dead and
silent ages of the world, which have gone and which lie buried in
the tomb of the bygone ages. The Roman diocese is therefore like
a vast pillar of spiritual light, reaching from earth to heaven, its
base jarred and buffeted by the revolutions, the changes of time,
and the weakness of fallen human nature, but it is upheld by
Christ himself, for it is his diocese, and the Pope is only his Vicar
General, ruling it for him till he comes again.
Christ therefore founded the dioceses in the persons of the
apostles, the first bishops of his church. His design was to divide
the whole world into small districts and territories, over each to
be a bishop ruling for Christ that part of the people of God.
While the chief matters which related to the whole church be-
long to the central authority of Rome, the simpler matters of
administration, the carrying out of the discipline, the administra-
tion of property, the purely local affairs were to be left in the
hands of the other bishops. Each diocese has then at its head a
bishop, the chief minister of Christ, in whose person and author-
ity the whole clergy and laity see Christ himself. The diocese as
well as the whole church is the spouse of Christ. Through the
bishop, at her head, who wears the marriage ring, the diocese is
wedded to Christ. She has all the riches of the graces of Christ
her spouse. The bishop by the laying on of hands brings forth
his clergy, the fruit of the superabundance of the complete
Priesthood of Christ. He administers the saving sacraments, the
channels of the graces of the Crucified. He enforces the rules
and laws of the universal church. He celebrates the wonders
of the crucifixion and of the last supper in the Mass each
Sunday, and the Gospel he preaches to the people. All the bene-
fits and the riches of the universal church are in the dioceses.
That is the nature of any living organism. Whatever is in it is
also found in each and every part of it. Each part of the church,
each diocese, each parish is a reproduction of the whole church.
'^ Whatever belongs to the whole organism in a certain way it
appears also to belong to a part. " '
But we must not fall into the error of thinking that the dioceses
and churches are independent, one of the other, or that they form
so many independent churches. They are all in the universal
* St. Peter Dam. Lit. Com. v- vol. c. 6.
392 HOW DIOCESES ARE FOUNDED.
church. They are the members of her that is the body of Christ.
Each diocese being a perfect church within and living in the uni-
versal church, there is a perfect home government in each diocese.
But they are all subject to the central diocese Rome, for the dio-
ceses live not in themselves but in the universal church, of which
the Roman Pontiff is the universal bishop and the Vicar of Christ,
who is the head of the jurisdiction of the whole church. Hence
those who try to find the model and the image of the church in
earthly governments will be mistaken, for she was formed and
modeled according to the image of the Holy Trinity. '* She ad-
heres to the heavenly mysteries. She is founded on the divine
stability. " '
Thus as Christ is the head and the spouse of the church,
by whom he brings forth his spiritual sons and his daughters, so
the Pope, his vicar, is the spouse of the diocese of Rome, and
each bishop is the spouse of his diocese, as the pastor is of his
parish. The Holy Ghost organizes the churches and brings these
forth as so many images of the Persons of the Trinity, " made
conformable to the image of his Son. "^ That Holy Ghost who is
the Breadth of the Father and of the Son, he was promised to the
world to be sent by the Father and by the Son, when he breatlied
on his disciples saying: ^'Receive ye the Holv Ghost. " ' That
same Holy Spirit, who is the bond of union between the Father
ind the Son, he is at the same time the bond of union between
)he Pope and the bishops, between the clergy and their bishop,
and between the people and their pastors. By the bishops, as
the chief ministers of Christ, the Holy Ghost teaches the races of
men. " The bishop has the power of enlightening, because he
resembles the Father of lights, and abundantly he has this power.
There is but one grace and power and order coming forth from
God first, and from the Father alone and from the bishop. " *
As Christ the eternal Bishop of bishops, comes down from his
supernatural sanctuary, the bosom of his Father, into the world
to found his universal church, which he rules by his Vicar the
Bishop of Rome, so the church universal by the voice of the Vicar
of Christ, sends the bishop into the diocese to be her head, her
spouse, as Christ is the spouse and the head of the church, as the
Father is the head of Christ. The bishop, head of the diocese
sends the pastor to the parish, to rule and govern it in the name
of Christ the head of every church on earth.
The world then is a great diocese, of which Christ is the head,
and the Bishop of Rome is his Vicar General ruling and adminis-
tering it till he returns. The dioceses are the great parishes of
the universal church, and the Pope is their Bishop. But the
bishops divide their dioceses into parishes, and over each they ap-
point a rector. Wonderful is the church in her sublime perfec-
tions, the last and most stupendous work of the Almighty. God
> St. Cyprian De Unit. Eccl. C. 6. n. 6. » Bom. vlll. 20. • John x. 22.
* Simeon Tbaa. de Sacer. Ord. c. 1.
ALL PERFECTIONS OF THE DIOCESE IN THE BISHOPS. 393
the Father embracing the Son, who came to earth, Father and
Son giving all their divinity to the Holy Ghost, he comes into
the world and forms the universal church of the fallen race of
Adam. The universal church gives birth to the diocese, and the
latter to the parish, which bring forth the laity '' born again
of water and of the Holy Ghost " into the kingdom of Christ, ail
peoples and churches being held together by the bond of the very
Trinity. " That you also may have fellowship with us and that
our fellowship may be with the Father and with his Son Jesus
Christ. '" Thus as Christ is the head of the diocese and church, we
are all united to him, and through him to the Persons of the Tri-
nity, " I in them and thou in me that they be made perfect in one."'
The adorable Persons of the Trinity are in the diocese, poured out
into the hearts of the people by the ministry of the clergy, all spirit-
ually born of the infinite richness of the atonement of Clirist the
head of the diocese, " I in the Father and the Father in me. " '
Thus Christ the head of the diocese presides over it in the person
of the bishop and in the ministry of the priests, *' In that day
you shall know that I am in my Father and you in me. " * The
body lives in and by the head. As Christ is the head of the dio-
cese, so the members of the diocese live and move and have their
whole spiritual being in Christ, who is their head. As St. Ambrose
speaking of the universal church said: " Where Peter is there is
the church " " so we can say that the whole diocese lives and has
its being in the person of the bishop. According to the designs of
Christ, all the learning of the clergy, all the sanctity of the people,
all the virtues of the whole diocese should centre in the perfections
of the bishop, as all the perfections of the universal church centre
in Christ. "You must know that the church is in the bishop
and the bishop in the church. " * Each bishop therefore should
be a model of every virtue and learning to both clergy and people,
as the Bishop of Eome shows every virtue and perfection of law
and of order to the other bishops and dioceses of the world. *' It
is necessary that where the bishop is there is his people, as where
Jesus Christ is there is the catholic church. " '
All science and learning centre in Christ. For *'all things were
by him made, and without him was nothing made that was made.'' *
The sciences of the saints, the knowledge of holy things are found
in the Pope the Vicar of him, to whose image and likeness they
were niade. To him in the person of Peter was given to feed the
laity, the lambs, and the other diocese the sheepfolds of Christ.
Alone of all the bishops of the world, he confirms the bishops
whom satan hath desired to sift as wheat. Aloft, sitting on the
Chair of Peter, crowned with the triple crown of the teaching,
the sanctifying and the ruling powers of Christ the Prophet,
Priest and King of ages, to whom be power and glory the immor-
tal and invisible God, " * the Bishop of the Roman diocese
1 John 1. 3. 2 John xvii. 33. « joi,n xiv. 10, * John xiv. 20.
• St. Ambrose In Psalm xl. 30. • St. Cyprian.
' St. Ignatius of Antioch Epist. Ad Smyr. n. 8. * John I. » I. Tim. I.
394 WHERE ARE THE FALLEK DIOCESES?
guards the '^deposit of faith, " given to the saints. From him
go forth apostolic men into every diocese and parish, teachers
of the nations sitting in the darkness of death.
Shining with the spiritual light of Christ, reflected from the
everlasting Throne of the Fisherman of Galilee, bishops preach
the Gospel of the Crucified, administer the sacraments, rule
churches, because they partake in the jurisdiction of the Vicar of
our blessed Lord. He is the administrator of the constitution and
the laWs of the church universal. Sent by him the bishops come
into their dioceses, bearing all the spiritual riches of their pastor-
ate, giving them without money and without price to the races
and the nations of the earth.
Following then these principles, the dioceses live in the persons
of their bishops.. Even the fallen churches, the once flourishing
dioceses of Asia, of Africa and of other parts of the world, but
now fallen from their ancient glories, still they live in the persons
of the titular bishops, who now bear their titles. Thus the bish-
ops who have been consecrated to these dioceses, bear radically in
their persons all the lights and privileges of these ancient fallen sees.
Christ established the Papacy in Peter, the episcopacy in the
apostles and the priests and ministers in the disciples. ' As the
Pope rules the church universal, so the bishops rule their dioceses,
so the pastors administer their churches. The Pope appoints
the bishops, the bishop appoints the rectors of the churches of the
dioceses. Christ laying down the supreme principles of the con-
stitution of the church, appointed the Papacy, the episcopacy as
well as the priests and the ministers of the church as the Council
of Trent declares. He founded the church universal alone, and
left the appointment of pastors and bishops to particular sees, to
the administration of the church. The administration of the
church is an act of jurisdiction, and it belongs to the Bishop of
Rome, in whom alone centres all jurisdiction in the church.
The bishop saving Mass, administering the sacraments or preach-
ing the Gospel is the most perfect image of Christ. He does so
according to the laws of the universal church. In him the clergy
and people see Christ the Bishop of eternity. " He that receiv-
eth you receiveth me. He that- despiseth you despiseth me."
That relates not only to the Pope, to the bishop, but in a less de-
gree to any pastor, to any minister of Christ. For the ministers
of Christ preach not themselves but " Christ and him crucified. " *
The bishop is the head of the diocese. He is the father of all the
faithful in the diocese. For he brings forth his spiritual children,
his priests and clergymen by rite of holy ordination. They are the
images of himself. The Priests he ordains are his sons whom he
brings forth to God. He feeds his children by the words of life,
by good example, by heavenly food, by the teachings of eternal
life. Happy is the diocese and the clergy who have a bishop
after the heart of Jesus Christ, who lives the life of the Master.
» ConcU. Trident. « I. Cot. U. 2.
WHERE THE CHURCH IS VISIBLE. 395
The good bishop loves his clergy; looks on them as a father on
his children; he upholds the good priest; he rewards the men of
God; he defends the weak; he treats them with justice, be-
nignity, gentleness, kindness; he is clothed with the bowels of
the mercy of Jesus Christ, with forgiveness looking down from on
high on those who falter on the way. Behold his name will be called
blessed, his clergy and people will love him, they will uphold him;
like Moses on the mount, they will stand under his weary hands,
strengthening him till he gains the victory over all enemies of the
Lord and of his church. Both clergy and people will love him
because he is "like unto the only begotten Son of God full of
grace and truth" ' who '' for us men and for our salvation left the
bosom of his Father, came down from heaven and was made man
and dwelt among us'"* to show pa'stors how to rule their sub-
jects.
The church universal then becomes individualized and person-
ified in the person of the Roman Pontiff, as God the Son became
visible and walked the earth, as Christ both God and man. Now
invisible to the eyes of men, he is visible to us in the person of
his Vicar or in the other bishops or pastors, the ministers of Christ
the spiritual heads of the churches, wherein God dwells whose
*' delights are to be with the children of men. " As the laity are
under their bishops and pastor, so the bishops and pastors are
under their superior in the Roman See. In spiritual power the
clergy are the same as Christ, because the sacraments adminis-
tered by them are the very same in healing power as though
Christ himself came and gave them. For to them in the persons
of the apostles the Lord said: " All power is given me in heaven
and on earth. Going forth therefore teach ye all nations. "" "What-
soever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be bound also in heaven,
and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth it shall be loosed al-
so in heaven. "* The Pope has this power over the canons and
laws made by himself or by his predecessors in every age. He
binds and loosens the doors of heaven, by making laws for the
good of the community which bind the consciences of men. For
being the Vicar of him, who received all power from his Father in
heaven and on earth, he is the chief legislator of the church uni-
versal and of each diocese, for he takes the place of him who is
the real head of every church and congregation in the world.
Leaving untouched and inviolate the laws of God in the revelation
and the primary truths of human reason, the Bishop of Rome can
annul, reform or abrogate every law enacted by the councils or by
his predecessors, for he has the same power and authority as they
had. To him was given charge of the sheepfolds of Christ.
For Christ in heaven now reigns over the spiritual church re-
joicing in the happiness of these celestial abodes. There, as the
head of "the saints made perfect," high over the prophets, patri-
archs, over angels and archangels, "the first born among many breth-
1 John I. 2 Nlcene Creed. ' Matt, xxvill. 19. < Matt. xvi. 19.
896 WHAT UNITES THE CHURCH ?
ren," there sits Christ as the head of the church universal. But
the church universal takes in not only the saints in heaven and
the saints not yet made perfect, but those who after death still
suffer for their sins and faults. He is at the same time the head
of the church on earth. But he presides on earth in the person
of the Bishop of Kome over all the dioceses into which the church
on earth divides. We give some of the beautiful words of St.
Ignatius, the second archbishop of Antioch after St. Peter and dis-
ciple of the Prince of the apostles. As he lived in the apostolic age
his words have great weight: "1 ask you to unite to the Sentence
of God, for Jesus Christ is the Sentence of the Father, as the bish-
ops scattered over the world are the sentences of Jesus Christ;
and you * should unite in the words of the bishop, because your
worthy priests of God unite with and harmonize with the bishops
as the strings of a lyre, and thus in your union and in your charity
Jesus Christ is praised without ceasing."' In another place he
says: "I think you are happy, you who are united to your bishops,
as the church is to Jesus Christ, and as Jesus Christ is to his Fath-
er."' "If the prayer of one or two has such power, how much
greater that of the bishop and the whole church united." "It is then
true that we should receive the bishop as the Lord himself."*
"Obey the bishop and the priests as one undivided." " These
words, still sounding from the apostolic age, he wrote when he was
about to die the most horrible death of martyrdom, and consequent-
ly his words have great weight.
The bishop then the head of the diocese takes the place of
Christ, both for priests and people. But we must consider the
first diocese and the first bishop of the world. The bishop and the
diocese of Eome is the model for all the bishops of the world, and
the diocese of Rome is the normal and the pattern according to
which all the other dioceses of the world are founded.
Christ founded the church on Peter saying: "Thou art Peter and
upon this rock I will build my church and the gates of hell shall
not prevail against it."' Peter, the head of the apostolic college,
came to Rome. There on the very steps of the throne of the
Caesars he fixed his apostolic Chair. "When the twelve apostles had
received from the Holy Spirit the power of preaching the Gospel
in all the languages of the earth, and when they divided the world
among them, blessed Peter the prince of the apostolic order, re-
served to himself the imperial city and Roman Empire, that the
law of truth, which was to bring salvation to the Gentiles, might
be better preached by him the head to the whole body of the
world from the head. You did not fear to come to this city. 0
most blessed Peter the apostle, and thy companion was Paul,
that apostle taken up with the ministry of so many churches. You
entered this wood filled with wild beasts of prey, this ocean of
deep iniquity, you walked over it safer than when you walked
' Church of Ephesus. ' St. Ignatius Eplst. ad Epbesus n. 3. 4. • IMdem n. ^.
* Ibidem n. 6. * Ibidem n-HO. * Hath. xt. 18.
WHAT PETER DID. 397
over the waters. Now you teach the people who believed coming
from the circumcision. You founded the church at Antioch,
where the dignity of the christian name rose, you filled Pontus,
Galacia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithania with your preaching of
the Gospel," &c. ' •
The diocese of Peter was to be the foundation of the church.
As Christ said to Peter: " And I say to thee that is as my Fath-
er has shown you my Divinity, thus I will show you your excel-
lency, because thou art Peter that is, as I am the unchangeable
Kock, I the corner stone, I who make both of us one. I am the
foundation on which no one can lay another foundation, but
thee thou also art a rock, because thou shalt be strengthened with
my power, and those which belong to me by my own power, I
will give you, so they will be common to us both, ' and upon this
rock I will build my church and the gates of hell shall not prevail
against it.' " " Upon this strength I will build my everlasting tem-
ple, and the height of my church shall pierce the heavetis, and in the
strength of this faith it shall rise. The gates of hell shall not
hold out against this confession. The bonds of death will not
bind it, for this word is the word of life. . . .Therefore he said to
blessed Peter: 'I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of
heaven, and whatever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound
also in heaven, and whatever thou shalt loose upon earth it shall
be loosened in heaven.' " '
An ancient tradition tells us that Pontius Pilate sent i-uch on
account of the life and miracles of Christ to the Roman emperor
Tiberius, that the latter was veiy angry at him for allowing Christ
to be crucified. The Aprocryphal Gospels give some curious details
of these times." But the persecutions at Jerusalem still continu-
ing, twelve or fourteen yeai's after our Lord's ascension, the apos-
tles divided the world up among them. St. Peter started on his
famous journey to Rome. He stopped at Antioch and there he
lived for seven years. He used to travel into different parts of
the surrounding countries giving missions to the people. He was
at Jerusalem in the year 37, when St. Paul came to see him and
stayed with him fifteen days. " The historian Eusebius tells us that
he preached to the Jews in various parts of Asia, before setting
out on his historic journey for Rome.
When Peter came to Rome, being a Jew, he first preached to
the Jews residing in the Jewish quarter of the imperial city. He
came in the year 43, in the reign of the emperor Claudius. Two
years after he returned to Jerusalem, where in the year 44 he was
arrested and thrown into prison by king Herod Agrippa, ° from
which he was delivered by an angel, for it was God's design that he
might die not at Jerusalem but at Rome. He then travelled into
many parts of Asia, preaching and establishing bishops in many
cities. When again he returned to Rome, the Jews raised such a
' St. Leo Ser. de SS. A post. Petri et Pauli ante raed. ^ jjatt. xvl. 18.
' St. LeoSermoS In Anniv. Assumpt. Suae p. in.
* Butler's Lives of the Saints. Si. Peter. * Gal. 1. 19. • Acts xU.
398 PETER^S OPPOSITION IN ROME.
disturbance over his coming, that the emperor Clandins banished
both christians and Jews from the city. With St. Paul, St, Peter
soon returned again to tlie eternal city, and tliere he made his
home. He stili travelled into many provinces, even into Judea,
but soon the increase of the (fluistian religion at Rome engaged
all his time.
One of his first converts was the celebrated Senator Pudens
and his daughter Pudentiana. The latter waited on tiie Prince
of the apostles in lier father's house, where Peter took up his
permanent abode. The table on which Peter said Mass in this
senator's house has been preserved in Rome as a relic of the times
of the great apostle. We must remember that the sctiators of the
time of Christ were great and powerful men, which Pyrhus com-
pared to kings. At that time they had collectively greater power
than kings at the present time. The conversion of this cele-
brated and wealthy family gave not only a place of residence for
the prince of the apostle, but the power and the standing of this
family attracted the attention of the Roman nobility.
Peter found opposition from an unexpected source. The reader
Avill remember, that when Peter went to comfirm the converts of
Samaria ' when they received the Holy Ghost the made new
converts worked many miracles. Simon Magns had practised his
trickery and magic amojig the Samarians, and being in league with
the devil he had deceived many of them. He wanted to perform
as great wonders as he saw the apostle and the converts work, and
he offered Peter money for the power of conferring the sacrament
of confirmation. For that inculent, to buy spiritual things with
money or with worldly gifts is called the sin of simony.
Simon was a complete hypocrite, yet he pretended to be a firm
christian. The works of Simon made him famons and liis reputa-
tion spread even to Rome, where he wejit and soon made an im-
pression on the superstitious Roman people, especially on the mind
of the emperor. In Rome all the errors of the world had found a
resting place, and Simon was received with great favor, even di-
vine honors being offered to him, and on an island in the Tiber tliey
erected to him a statue with an inscription. " Above all he ex-
erted agreat influence on Messalina, wife of the emperor Claudius.
Because of her adulteries and crimes, Messalina was put to death
in the year 48, and then the emperor Claudius, who was like a
child with gray hairs and as big a fool as ever reigned took to wife
his niece Agrapina, a crime till then condemned by the Roman
law. By her first husband Agrapina had a son Nero, whom Chin-
dius adopted as his own son, although he had another son by
Messalina called Britanicus. This bad woman pushed Claudius
to every extreme, and enflamed the Romans against the church.
Thus rose the first persecution against the Christiana. It was di-
rected especially against Sts. Peter and Paul. In tlie year 51
Agrapina poisoned the emperor Claudius, and by a series of aw-
> Acts. * "SeiQoni Deo Sancio." SU. Justin. Ireneus. TertuIMsD. &c-
PETER AT NERO'S COURT. 399
ful crimes, she prepared the way to the throne of the Roman em-
pire for her son Nero, who became the greatest monster of the fal-
len race of Adam.
For five years the young prince Nero, ruled well, after he had
set aside his bad mother. He did this because in his administration
he was guided by his master Seneca. In the year 55 he poisoned
his brother Britanicus while they were at supper. In 58 he killed
liis own mother, so as to put her out of his way to complete mastery
of the throne. Simon Magus soon gained the esteem of this tyrant,
by acting on his supertitious mind. The emjieror's only ambition
was to become master of magic. For this reason he called the
chief magicians of the world to Rome to teach him their magic arts.
This was the state of things when St. Peter returned to Rome, and
there he found as his chief opponent this impious Simon Magus,
whom before he had met at Samaria.
Peter continually suffered from the persecutions and the plottings
of this Simon the Sfagician, who had become the leader of the Jews
agait\st him. When St. Paul returned from his preaching among
tlie gentiles, after the Romans thought him dead, Peter told Paul
all the difficulties raised before him by this bad Simon. ^ It is said,
but we do not vouch for its truthfulness, that when a tumult rose
between the Gentiles and the Jews, St. Paul came to Rome and
Peter rose up and explained how as Eve was created out of the side
of Adam so the church came out of the side of Christ &c. At this
Sermon Nero's wife Libia believed, and was baptized, besides a slave
of Agrippa and some of the soldiers, as well attendants on the bed-
chamber of the emperor Nero.
The eloquence of Sts. Peter and Paul penetrated every mind,
and the church at Rome was growing rapidly, when Simon Magus
rose up to oppose the good work. By his magic he made statues
move, he raised himself in the air and did other wonders, while
Peter healed the sick, gave sight to the blind and even raised the
dead, performing miracles like to his Divine Master. Peter and
Simon each had their following, and such a noise was raised that the
tumult came to the ears of Nero, who first sent for Simon and then
for the apostle St. Peter. Simon claimed to be the Son of God,
while St. Peter told the emperor that he was an imposter, and ad-
vised the emperor to look up the report of Pontius Pilate about
Christ sent in to his predecessor the emperor Tiberius. The report
having been read before the court as given by Pilate, relating that
the Jews claimed that the Holy One of God would come, that
Jesus did great wonders, that the Jews cruqified him, that the
soldiers guarded his grave, that he rose from the dead, and that
the Jews bought the soldiers up to say that while they slept the disci-
ples came and stole his body &c. Then Peter told the emperor
how all these things took place as related in Pilate's letter.
The dispute between Sts. Peter and Paul on one side, and Simon
Magus on the other waxed strong and warm for many days before
' Acts or Peter and Paul Aprocr. Gospels.
400 DEATH or STS. PETER A.KD PAUL.
the emperor's court, till Simon claimed that if the emperor put him
to death he would rise on the third day. Then they secretly put
a ram to death, and Simon's followers claimed that Simon was
beheaded. Simon claimed to be the Son of God. But when he
found that Nero inclined to believe Sts. Peter and Paul, he prom-
ised to ascend into heaven to his Father, from the top of a tower
as Christ had ascended from the mount of Olives.
Nero ordered a lofty tower built in the Campus Martins, and
the next day the whole city turned out to see the ascension.
When Simon went up into the tower St. Paul fell upon his kneesand
began to pray. Crowned with laurels Simon began to fly, held up
aloft it is said by demons. Then Peter with Paul prayed to the
Lord, that he might fall. At once Simon Magus fell from a great
height into the street Via Sacra, and broke his legs and later he
died from his injuries.
His followers claiming that he would rise from the dead the
third day, the emperor imprisoned the two apostles in the Mamer-
tine prison, where they converted their guards. The emperor
condemned them to be killed in a sea fight for the amusement of
the populace. But Agrippa advised that they be put to death by
violence. St. Paul was a Roman citizen, and Romans were never
condemned to the disgraceful and excruciating death of crucifix-
ion, he was beheaded outside the walls at the Three Fountains.
A few days before St. Peter, fearing the terrible persecution had
fled from the city. Outside the walls he met our Lord bearing his
cross towards the city. Peter asked him where he was going, and
Christ replied: '* To Rome to be crucified." Taking the hint the
apostle again returned to the city.' Remembering that he had
denied his Master, when they were about to crucify him, Peter
asked that he might be crucified with his head down. Thus died
the great apostles on the ;i9th of June in the year 66.
Marcellus, Basilissa, and Anastasia with others, took the body
of St. Peter and hid it under the terebinth of the circus on the
Vatican hill. A little oratory rose over their tomb. There the
bodies of both apostles found a resting place, while their heads
were afterwards placed in the Pope's cathedral St. John Lateran.
When in 313 Constantino repaired the tomb, and built the great
St. Peter's church, he placed the bodies in metalic caskets, on the
lid of which he laid a cross of gold weighing 150 lbs. Over
their bodies to-day stands the great St. Peter's Church, the
grandest church raised to the glory of the Living God. The
crypt where rest the bodies of Sts. Peter and Paul is called the
Confession of St. Peter. In the days of Constantino, before ho
moved the seat of the empire to the banks of the Bosphorus and
founded the great capital of Constantinople, he covered the M'alls
of the Confession of St. Peter's with plates of gold encrusted
with most precious gems.
In the days of the pagan empire, captive kings and conquered
* Boman Tradition. Apocryphal Gospels, Arti of Peter and Paal.
INFLUENCE OF ROME ON NATIONS. 401
nations thronged the streets of Rome. But they came as slaves.
From the days of Peter strangers still come to Rome, but they
come as christians rescued from the darkness of error walking in
tlie light of the Gospel. They come to the feet of the successor
of the humble Fisherman of Galilee, and to the tomb of the two
great apostles Peter and Paul. Each bishop of the universal
church must come and give an account of his diocese to Peter
in his successor. Once each three years come the bishops of It-
aly, the bishops of Europe every four years, and the bishops of
Ireland, of Asia and of America, every ten years must render an ac-
count of their stewardship to the the Pope, and pray at the tombs
of the great apostles, and their visits are called their visits to
" Limina Apostolorum," — Tombs of the Apostles. Tiius the great
St. Peter's Church is the tomb of Peter the first Bishop of Rome.
In the sixteenth century Clement VII., with cardinal Bellarmin
and the members of the Papal court went down into the Confession
and found the casket and tlie cross of gold placed on it by Constan-
tine in 312. From the days of the apostles, Sts. Peter and Paul,
Rome and her Bishops ever stood as a lighthouse to guide the na-
tions sitting in the darkness of death and error. But the gates of
hell rose up against that throne, and for 300 years the whole power
of pagan Rome raged against the church, personified in her /isible
head, the successor of Peter. But the Popes at once began the
providential work given them by God. The sons of Esau child
of Isaac, who sold his birthright to his younger brother Jacob
the father of the Jews, his children having settled Italy, the
Jews rejected the Lord, who chose the Italians children of Esau, as
the people selected for the seat of the Papacy, and the children of
Esau received at last his birthright. From that time, Rome and
not Jerusalem, became the city of God.
The Popes at once began the conversion of paganism. Up to
that time there was no law or courts where Justice was found
among men. The Popes issued laws and canons to every nation,
people, and church. The church tempered the cruelty of these
pagan idolaters by wise and just regulations. Oufside her pale
there was neither mercy, forgiveness, or justice for the fallen.
The Bishops of Rome thundered against the oppressions of rulers
grinding their subjects. The ignorant laity, crushed with the
weight of sin and of bad rulers, found that the clergy were their
only friends, and tyrants found in the church a power they had
to respect. The constitutions of Popes, the apostolic letters of
the Roman Pontiffs, their bulls and briefs then became the
framework of that wonderful code of laws the canon law of the
church, by which the whole vast organism of Christendom was
ruled and regulated. The relations of the people to their pastors,
the duties of priests to the bishops, the functions of every office
in the church, the way each sacrament must be administered, the
official act of every officer of the church, from the Pope down
to the simplest layman, was regulated by the enactments and the
402 ROMAN INFLUENCE ON THE WORLD.
laws made by the Popes. They form the canon or ecclesiastical
law of the church, which should be written in letters of gold
shining with the sunlight for the instruction of mankind.
At the time of Christ, the Roman empire in the secret designs
of God's Providence settled by the sons of Esau, blessed by Isaac
had spread over the earth, sending everywhere Roman civiliza-
tion, an image of the more wonderful destin}' of christian Rome
over modern christian civilization, as before the sons of Japhet
blessed by Noe had founded the Greek empire. From the Roman
law the church took many principles of justice and of reason be-
tween man and man, and incorporated them into her canon law.
Then having purged Roman law from the errors of paganism, and
incorporated christian principles into what was good among the
Romans, she sent them blessed with the truths of the Gospel to
all the nations who received their faith from the royal line of Pe-
ter. She spread these truths over the whole christian world.
These were the first rays of the liberty of 'conscience, of the dig-
nity of man redeemed, and of the priceless value of immortal
souls. From that exhaustless font of the Papacy, in the later
middle ages, men drew their rules of politics, their forms of legal
procedure, their framework of courts, their modes of government,
their international law, and their inspiration for the bettering of
human life.
In the bishops' houses, in the monasteries and schools of chris-
tian scientists, in the confessional, from the pulpits of the churches,
the Gospel truths were taught the people, not as coming from the
teacher but as the reflections of the Bishop of Rome, and the def-
initions of Peter. All the founders of the christian nations were
taught by the clergy of the church, and from them the statesmen
of the middle ages learned the wisdom of governing well their
subjects. Under the shadow of Westminister Abbey, the first Eng-
lish parliament sat inspired by tiie clergy who infused christian
principles into the great nssembly of the Saxons, and in the lapse
of ages they wrested the liberties of the people from tyrannical
kings. In France, Spain, Austria and in every country of Chris-
tendom it was the same. From England we get our laws thus pur-
ified, and the people of this country must look to the clergy and to
the Popes for the liberty and prosperity they enjoy.
Under the eyes of the Popes, or by their directions in the early
ages, the Missal used in saying Mass, the Ritual containing the
prayers in administering the sacraments, the Pontifical which the
bishop uses in episcopal functions, the Breviary containing the
prayers said by all the clergy in sacred orders, all the liturgical
works of the church have grown up from the apostolic age, and we
do not know their authors. They go back till they are Tost in the
time following the apostles. Tiie Bible alone excepted, no Liter-
ature can compare with these official books of the church. The
power and sublimity of the Scriptures, the polish and sweetness
of the finest poetry, the eloquence and stately figures of the
JESUS CONSOLING AND HEALING THE SICK.
404 MYSTIC MEANING OF CHURCH BUILDINGS.
greatest orators, the mysticism of the Jewish church and the tem-
ple sacrifice, the grandeur of tlie Greek and Koman writers, the
matchless compositions of the Latin and Greek aiitliors, all seem
consecrated and embodied in these official works of the Koman
chnrch. Fur they have spread to the uttermost ends of the
earth, and on the title pages you will see that they are the ofiicial
books of the Eoman diocese.
From the tabernacle of tiie Jews, christian Rome learned the
fundamental plan of church bnil^^ings, for the model of the tab-
ernacle came from God, who told Moses to make it according to
the model shown him on the mount. The Roman basilica or
court lionse gave tiie idea of the gothic and Greek cross. The
first fine churches were bnilt in Rome under the direction of the
Popes, and from there all church architecture decorated with the
finest works of the artists and sculptors, church buildings spread
over the world. The cathedral itself is but a model in material
form of the diocese, while tlie parish church is the ritual embodied
in the church building, filled with mysticism of the revelation
made to man, which was treasured up by the apostolic men,
guarded by the Bishops of Rome, impressed on Rome's most beauti-
ful building, and from the eternal city spread over the christian
world, by Christ speaking through the lips of his Vicar. Thus
the Holy Spirit, the Soul of the church speaks to the world, not
only by the voice of the visible head, but also we might almost say
by the customs, observances and traditions of the Roman diocese,
and by the christian civilization which spreads from Rome to the
whole world.
God the Son dwelled invisible in the bosom of his Father; but
he became man that we might know and see him. So the
church universal and invisible becomes individualized and visible
in the Bishop and diocese of Rome to whom Pefer brouoht all
the riches of the Papacy, which he had received from his Master.
Little by little did the wonders of that papal power appear be-
fore the minds of men, till the Vatican Council gave it tlie finish-
ing touch. Before this time, seventeen great legislative bodies of
bishops or councils had met and offered to the world salutary meas-
ures for the accommodation of the changing customs of men, so the
nations might better receive the good tidings of the Gospel. But
these councils did not change any old doctrines or form new truths
different from what had been received from the apostles. Under
the direction of the Bishop of Rome they decreed certain changes
of discipline and customs, while the fundamental constitution of
the church remained the very same. The Roman Pontiffs gave
the diverse impulses to these great legislative councils in every
age. and without him they could do nothing in any council. These
legislative bodies of the church, or these councils, first gave the
key to all the other popular legislative branches of modern gov-
ernments. The courts of the cliurch for the trial of cases first met
in Rome, from which they spread to the other dioceses of the world.
The Election of Bishops-
jESUS Christ called his apostles from the ranks of the disciples,
" And going np into a mountain, he called unto him whom
he wonld himself; and thoycame to him. And he made
that twelve should he with him, and that he might send
them to preach."* To them after the resurrection he said: " As
the Father hath sent me so I also send you: Going forth there-
fore teaoli all nations.'^' Such was the election of the first bish-
ops oi' tlie church. To the clergy of Ephesus St. Paul said:
"Take heed to yourselves and to the whole flock, wherein the Holy
Ghost hath placed you bishops to rule (Poimainein) the church
of God." ' The apostles with the laity and clergy elected Mat-
thias in tlie place of Judas. In the first chapter of his Epistle to
Titus, St. Paul tells him the qualities a bishop should have be-
fore he consecrates him to that holy office. Thus history shows
us that following the example of Christ bishops, were ever conse-
crated by bishops.
In the early church the clergy and laity were usually called to take
part in the selection of the candidate for the vacant church. The
bishops of the early church always consulted the clergy regarding
the piety and learning of the priest or deacon they elevated to the
episcopal office. In the age immediately following the apostles,
they often selected a heroic confessor of the faith, one who had.
showed his virtue and faith by suffering for the church. For
that reason many of the immediate bishops the followers of the
apostles bore the marks of persecution. This way of electing
prelates continued for the first three centuries, so that many of
the bishops sitting in the Council of Nice were disfigured, or bore
» Mark ill. 13, 14. * John xx. 21. » f^f.^ ^x. 28.
405
8E.\T8 rOB THE MEMBEfM OF THE CATHEDRAL CHAPTEK. BRUNN CATUEURAL, AUSTRIA-
WHAT ST. CYPRIAN SAYS. 407
the scars and wounds of the persecutions of the Roman empire, to
which Constantine put a stop by his conversion.
The apostles appointed bishops in each city where they had
made converts. The consecration ceremony was very simple.
After the selection of the candidate, in which the apostle took the
most active part, they prayed and fasted, and then surrounded by
the whole people, they imposed their hands on the elect, inducted
him into his episcopal chair, and before the whole church they
gave him his commission to rule that part of the church of God.
From the time of Constantine, the christian peoples increased,
and the nobles, the judges, the magistrates, &c. , took an active
part in the election of their bishop. But the chief duty belonged
to the clergy of the diocese, and the laity were given a voice, not
as a right but as a privilege. St. Cyprian in numerous parts of
his writings tells us the role each rank of clergyman took in the
election, saying that such came from the traditions of the apos-
tles.' ** It is required of us," he says, " to guard the divine and
apostolic traditions, such as are held by us and by all other prov-
inces. That the ordination may be carried out in a proper man-
ner, all the bishops of the province gather at the place where a
pastor is to be promoted, and he must be elected in the presence of
the people, who know the life of each one, for he lived among
them for a long time. We saw how this took place among us at
the consecration of Sabin, our colleague, to whom we gave the
episcopacy following the votes of his brethren and the judgment
of the bishops, as well as those who were present, besides those
whom we notified by letters, that they mighc think of him after
which we had imposed hands on him, and we substituted him in
the place of Basilidus, who had been deposed because of his
crimes."
Such St. Cyprian says was the way Christ ordered bishops to be
elected. That was the way he was elected himself. When the
clergy and people were unanimous regarding a candidate, it was
taken as a judgment of God. Not only the people and the clergy
of the cathedi'al city, but also the laity and clergy of the country,
and of all the towns and cities of the whole diocese were called to
take part in the election of the father of the diocese." When the
diocese of Tours became vacant, a great crowd of people and of
clergy from all the surrounding country gathered at Tours and
elected the great St. Martin of Tours.'
That was not only the discipline of Europe, but also the custom
of the Orient. When the Council of Chalcedon met, some of the
bishops doubted the regularity of the election of St. Lawrence
bishop of Ephesus, who replied: " Forty bishops of Asia ordained
me with the votes of the nobles, the princes and the venerable
clergy of the whole city." ^ When Pope St Leo called the bish-
ops of the world to this council, he wrote to the bishops of the
' Epist. 08. 2 Sererua Sulpiclus. ' Severus Sulpicius. In Vita S. Martini C. 7-
* Act. 2.
408 HOW ST. BAZIL WAS ELECTED.
province of Vienna, that no episcopal election would be considered
as rightly carried out in any different way, adding: "they must have
the signatures of tiie clergy, the testimony of honorable persons,
and the consent of the magistrates and of the people .... he who
is to be over all should be elected by all." ' Such was the way of
electing bishops in all parts of the church up to the middle of the
fifth century, and it was the way the great bishops such as the
Cyrils, the Chrystoms, the Augustines, the Bazils and the great-
est men of the church were elected.
But the minor details were not always the very same in all parts
of the world at that time. The archbishop and the bishops of
the province at all times took the most prominent part in the
election. They asked the people and the clergy for their votes,
** It was," as Pope St. Oelestine says, *' lest a bishop they would
not receive be placed over them."* The confirnnition or the
vetoing of the choice was always in the hands of the bishops, who
acted as the delegate of the Bishop of Rome. Pope Oelestine
wrote to the bishops of Calabria, that, ** In these times they must
teach the people and not follow them, toll them what is allowed
them and what is not." ' When Eusebius bishop of Cesarea died,
the clergy of the diocese wrote to all the bishops of the province
to come to the election. Gregory a priest with a little country
parish was old and could not come, but he wrote to the clergy
saying that he gave his vote for Bazil, " He is a man I say before
God, whose life and teachings are pure and the only man or the
one most proper to oppose heresy," &c. The good old priest
Gregory also wrote to bishop Eusebius, who was not of that prov-
ince, imploring him to come because of the spread of heresy at
Cesarea, and Gregory was carried to Cesarea in his bed of sickness.
The great St. Bazil was thus elected to the vacant see of Cesarea
although the rich and well to do of the diocese opposed his selec-
tion. *
Thus we see how careful they were in the early church in the elec-
tion of tiie bishops, so much sothatevenbishopsof otherprovinces
took an active part in the selection of the candidiites. In Africa
it was customary to send one of the neighboring bishops to the
widowed cathedral church, to teach the people and clergy the
manner of holding the election, so it might not degenerate into a
political intrigue. That bishop then governed the vacant church
and was called the Intercessor or Visitor. His duties were regu-
lated by the V. Council of Carthage. ' The see remained vacant
for one year, so ns to give the clergy and people plenty of time to
select the new bishop, while if the see was not filled at the end of
the year, the visiting bishop returned home, and another neighbor-
ing bishop took his place. That was the custom in Africa,
but tlie council of Chalcedon gives oidy three months for a
vacancy. *
• Epist. X. n. e<1. » Eptat. H. Cap. 6. » Epist. 111. c. 8.
* (ireg, Eplst. 1» oral. 10 el 1». » Can. 6. • St. Greg. L. 6. Eplat. A
EXAMINING THE EPISCOPAL CANDIDATE. 409
"When the clergy and laity were well instructed by the visiting
bishop, a day for the election was appointed, and all the bishops
of the province were called to the city to take part. Then they
appointed three days of prayer and fasting in which to ask the
light of the Holy Spirit. When the bishops assembled, they placed
before them a list of the voters, the archbishop with his suffragan
bishops presiding as inspectors of the election. They counted the
voters cleric and laic. They examined the candidate, his learning,
morals and his worthiness for the office. The candidate received
no right to the diocese or to the vacant see, till he was ap-
proved by the archbishop and the bishops, who always selected the
candidate proposed by the clergy and people, unless very urgent
reasons required them to veto the choice.
The IV. Council of Carthage, composed of 214 bishops held in
389, tells us how the candidate was examined before iiis conse-
cration to the vacant see. They carefully examined if he were
prudent, moderate, chaste, temperate, attentive to his religious
duties, affable with all, merciful, well versed in the laws of God,
a good biblical student, well knowing the meaning of the Gospels
and posted in the dogmatic teaching of the church. But above
all things they examined him in matters relating to faith. So as
not to surprise him or confuse him before the whole church, they
allowed him to write his answers to their questions on the chief
dogmas of religion. According to this Council, they asked him
among other things, if he believed that God is the Author of both
the Old and New Testaments, of the law, of the prophecies, and of
the Gospels; if he believed that the devil is bad by his own will,
if he approved marriage, if he was certain that outside the cath-
olic church there was no salvation &c.
That examination having been found satisfactory, the clergy
and people presented him to the bishops for consecration. The
archbishop assisted by two of his suffragan bishops then consecrated
him according to the rules of the council of Nice. ' Such was
the mode of electing bishops during the first five centuries of the
church, and many of the bishops selected with such care became
the very flower of the whole episcopacy of the Church, they were
the great saints and doctors who illuminated the whole world by
the splendors of their talents and the beauties of tlieir wi-itings.
Even to this day their Avorks are mines of learning, from Avhich
we learn the truths of the traditions of the apostles.
The Roman emperors following Constantine were for the
most part at least christian, if only nominally, and they began
to mix in the election of the bishopsof their empire. First they left
the church free to follow the holy canons, except in the election of
the Bishops of Eome and of Constantinople. They asked that
the name of the bishop elect might be sent to them for their
approval before his consecration, and to this the church agreed
rather than excite their poAverful hostility. Justinian the ein-
* Concll Nic. Can. 4.
410 FIRST GOVERNMENT INTERMEDDLING.
peror first obtained that concession. Lyons, then the principal
city of France, often waited for what tliey thought was a special
mark of Providence before they elected their .bishop. ' Once
after the death of their beloved bishop, it is said an angel
appeared in the form of a ciiild, and told them to send for St.
Encher, who had hidden in a cave, and they sent their archdeacon
to bring him to Lyons to be consecrated.
When in the V. and VI. centuries the barbarians swept down
from the North overran Europe, and laid the foundaions of the
modern nations of Christendom, many of these princes fell into the
Arianean heresy which denied the Divinity of Christ. Seeing the
power exercised by the bishops over the people, they asked to be
given a voice in their election. * Rather than fight them, the
church conceded that, not as a right but as a favor, allowing the
kings to represent the people in such elections, still reserving to the
bishops and the clergy the right of vetoing an unworthy candidate.
A council held at Paris in 557 regulated that matter for the king-
dom of France, and forbade the consecration of any bishop with-
out the consent of the bishops and the clergy of the widowed
diocese. Later when a bishop died, they had to get an order
from the king to elect and consecrate his successor. '
When the bishop of Aixdied, Nicetius the Count received from
king Chilperic permission to have another bishop consecrated for
the vacant see. King Thirry, the eldest son of king Clovis, had
St. Quintien consecrated to the see of Clermont, and when bish-
op Pientius died at Paris, king Charibert ordered them to elect
Pascentius in his place. * Many elections took place in this way
throughout the diffierent kingdoms of Europe. The Visigoths of
Spain and the kings of France obtained the same privilege, which
was conceded to the former by the VL council of Toledo, * and
by the XIV. council held at the same place. These elections took
place thus: the king named a person in sacred orders whom he
would like to see promoted to the vacant see; the bishops and
the clergy examined the candidate in the same way as described
above, and if no obstacle stood in the way they consecrated him
in the regular manner and installed him in his episcopal throne.
In the beginning of the eighth century King Louis the Meek re-
nounced that royal concession or privilege in the parliament at
Attigni, saying that the church should be free in such actions, he
being the first emperor who gave complete liberty to the church
since the dominion of the Franks, and the conquests of the Bar-
barians.
Regarding the election of the archbishops, they always informed
the emperor to see if he had any objection to their candidate.
When a see became vacant, the clergy and people informed the
archbisliop, who reported the fact to the emperor or king. Then
the archbishop nominated a bishop to visit the vacant diocese
« MabUloti Consr. T. I. p. 24«. » Fleuri Inat. Cad. 10. * St. Greg, of Tours.
« Grejt. L. a. C. 16. 1. b. C. W. » Tit. I. C. 10.
HOW ABUSES AIIOSE. 411
who presided over the election and saw that the canons of the
church were observed. The visiting bishop called a meeting of
the clergy and people in the cathedral, where ho read the Lesson
of St. Paul regarding the qualities of a bishop, and the laws of the
church defining the mode of election. Then the clergy attached
to the cathedral and other churches of the diocese, the monks,
nuns and people, voted for the candidates. At that time the
monks took an active part in the proceedings. For three days
they fasted and prayed before they voted. All voters signed the
paper and sent it to the archbishop, who called together all the
bishops of the province. They usually met in the vacant cathe-
dral, and examined to see if the election had been held in a reg-
ular way, and according to the laws of the church. The candi-
date who had received the most votes then appeared before the
meeting of bishops, where the archbishop as chairman examined
him regarding his birth, his life, his promotion to the orders he
had already received, so as to see if there might be any irregular-
ity, after wiiich the bishop elect made a profession of faith, then
a day for the consecration was appointed. If any obstacle were
found, they rejected him, and at once held another election.
Such was the way of electing bishops from the VII. to the IX.
centuries in many parts of Europe.
Later Lothair son of Charles the Bauld disposed episcopal sees
almost as he wished, against which abuse Pope Leo IV. protested
in the election of the deacon Colonus to the vacant see of Reiti.
Pope Engenius IV. wrote the same kind of a protesting letter to
Count Guy. The successors of Louis the Meek on the other side
of the Ehine followed the example of their father, and left the
church free in the selection of her bishops. But the rulers who
came later often abused this privilege, once granted tiieir ances-
tors by the church, and they frequently disposed vacant sees as
they wished, sometimes even nominating their unworthy relatives
to the vacant dioceses. Above all these abuses grew especially in
Germany and England, kings giving the ring and pastoral staff to
whom they wished, taking no notice of the elections or votes of
the clergy and laity of the vacant sees.
Henry IV. son of Henry the Black claimed the right of nom-
inating all the bishops and pastors of his empire, and he even
sold the vacant churches and dioceses to the highest bidders. In
this way many unworthy men were introduced into the church.
Many Popes protested against these crying abuses, till the cele-
brated Hildebrand ascended the throne of Peter. Taking the
name of Gregory VII. he began a bold contest causing many
wars, the Pope protested against Henry appointing bishops and
pastors to the vacant churches of his empire, and Henry claimed
the right. The whole of Europe was arrayed on one side or the
other, with the church or with the state. The emperor held that
-his predecessors for centuries had the right of appointing all the
bishops of the kingdom, while the Pope protested that it was
412 THE CHURCH ASSERTS HER RIGHTS.
only a favor given them by the church, which the church could
at any time withdraw. St. Oihon had been appointed the guar-
dian of the episcopal rings and pastoral staffs of the vacant bish-
oprics of Germany, and which he was accustomed to lay before
the throne of the'emperor. When he himself was elected to the
episcopal throne of Bamberg, he received his iuvestature, not
from the emperor, but at Rome from the hands of the intrepid
Pope Gregory VII. who consecrated him. St. Anselm had re-
ceived the crosier and ring from Henry I. of England, but on re-
ceiving a protesting letter from Gregory VII., he sent the Pope
the insignia of his office and retired to a monastery, from which
he was again recalled by the Pope to take charge of his diocese.
In that day even the saints were not well instructed regarding
the matters in dispute till taught by the Holy See. The abbot of
Cluny, St. Hugues, became the mediator between Henry of Ger-
many and the Holy See. In England, St. Anselm had trouble
with Henry I. of England regarding the same question, and he
refused to consecrate bishops selected by the king, claiming that
the chuich alone could choose her ministers. Tlie question so
agitated the civilized world, that neither clergy or people could
with safety exercise their right of voting for tbeir bishops, the
kings and political rulers claiming the whole right. Such was the
condition of the church in the XII. centnry. From that time
the church has maintianei her freedom in the choice of the bishops,
and temporal rulers lost the right of electing themselves bishops and
abbots, as well as the concession regarding tlie election of the clergy
Such was the discipline of the XIII. century. The victory
which Gregory VII. gained over the oppressions of the state and
of politicians interfering in the election of church officials will
last to the end of the world. From that time the church has
been free in the appointment of her ministers, although later
cruel rulers received the privilege of nominating candidates for
ecclesiastical dignities.
During these epochs and the centuries following the devas-
tations of the barbarians, the laity, having been for the most part
intimidated from taking part in the election of the bishops, the
kings and rulers retained and assumed as a right that they alone
could elect bishops. The church having asserted her rights in
that most important matter in the historic contest with Henry of
Germany, from the XII. and XIII. centuries the members of the
cathedral chapter took their place as the electors of the bishops,
and the llolv See generally confirmed their choice. Forming the
senate of tlie diocese, the canons met in regular form and se-
lected their candidate to the exclusion of all others. At this
epoch they did not even allow the bishops of the province to take
any part in the selection of their bishop. We see the remains of
that in the election of the rulers of the religious orders, which
were established or reformed at that time.
Grave contests rose in the cliurch at Canterbury England, be-
FROZEN BODIES OF THE MONKS IN THE MORTUARY CHAPEL,
THE CELEBRATED HOSPICE OF ST, BERNARD ON THE ALPS.
414 CUSTOMS OF THE MIDDLE AGKS.
tween the archbishop of that see and the chapter of the cathedral,
composed for the most part of regular cauons or monks. The
Holy See favored the chapter. Innocent III. proclaimed the
ancient rights of the chapters, and upheld their right of electing
their bishops, both in Canterbury and in Strigonie and in Coloza.
In 1269 St. Louis, king of France, issued a letter telling all the
canons of the vacant cathedrals to assemble for the election of
bishops to the vacant sees of his kingdom, stating they could on
condition that they would first get the consent of the king before
proceeding to ballot. The cathedral chapter used to send the
archdeacon with a letter from the dean of the chapter to the
king, asking license to proceed to the election of a bishop ta
the vacant see.
During this epoch when all Europe dwelled in peace, the mem-
bers of the cathedral chapter to the exclusion of the rest of the
clergy, of the laity and of civil princes — this senate of the
diocese alone took part in the election of their bishops. 1 hen
when Rome had confirmed their choice, they called on the arch-
bishop to consecrate him. Usually the bishop elect himself
asked the Holy See to confirm his election. As the bishops of
that time for the most part ranked as great lords, and adminis-
trators of vast properties then belonging to the church, such
elections sometimes became the cause of civil contests, and
John XXII. reserved all confirmations to the Holy See, so that
they might examine the proceedings at Rome and exclude the
unworthy. By agreements with the kings of France and of
Spain in 1516, the latter took part again in the election of bish-
ops of these countries, the bishops of these kingdoms being
temporal princes of these nations. In 1447 the church formed
an agreement with the kings of Germany regulating the election
of bishops in that country. The bishops at thai time took two
oaths at their consecration, one to the state, the other to the
church, swearing on the holy Gospels to fulfil their duties to
both powers. Halinard abbot of St. Benigne de Dijon, elected arch-
bishop of Lyons refused to take the customary oath to the king of
France, as he did not wish to be a bishop, being very humble,
and the king did not press the matter at his consecration, being
requested to omit that part at the request of Bruno of Toul,
who later became Pope Leo IX. This took place in 1046.
The custom of taking an oath at the consecration of a bishop
began first in England, because there the bishops had become lords
sitting in parliament, and taking an active part in the temporal
administration of the realm. Some of the archbishops of York
refused to acknowledge the supremacy of the archbishops of Can-
terbury over them, and the latter archbishops, being the primates
of the whole kingdom, demanded that they take an oath of obe-
dience to them at their consecration. Thus in 1072 archbishop
Lafranc primate of Canterbury, made Thomas archbishop of York
take an oath of obedience to him at his consecration to that see^
GOIKG BACK AGAIK. 415
as was customary for many years before. These were only local
customs, differing in different countries, while the Popes only re-
quire canonical obedience of all the officials of the church, that is
obedience according to her wise canon laws, by which the whole
organization is ruled, regulated and kept together. Before the
time of Gregory VII., only a promise of canonical obedience was
required by the church. Before giving them the pallium, this
Pope required archbishops to take an oath of fidelity to him.
This was required at that time of trouble with the civil powers in
the appointment of all bishops and pastors, as the civil govern-
ments claimed such appointments.
In the rapid sketch given here of the diverse ways of nominat-
ing bishops, we have not stopped to give the many and deplorable
abuses which arose from the days of the apostles in different coun-
tries. The office of bishop is so high, and brings with it such
power, that in all ages designing men have coveted it, and gov-
ernments have tried to use it for political purposes. To the great
Gregory VII. we are indebted for the freedom every christian
church has now in the appointment of their pastors. We must
now go back to the apostolic age and trace the true and legitimate
way of electing bishops in the church of God.
To Peter Christ gave the office of feeding his lambs, his laity
and his sheep the other churches of his kingdom. To Peter then
and to his Successors belongs the appointment of bishops. Christ
himself first appointed the apostles the first bishops of his church,
and to the Papacy it ever belonged. No matter how they were-
selected, from the days of the apostles their confirmation ever-
belonged by an inherent right which was not always executed by^
the Holy See. Because of the difficulties of travelling and the
delays in getting word from Rome, in the early church the Popes
first appointed the patriarchs, both of the East and of the West,
and then by the same confirmation the patriarchs became the del-
egates of the Holy See in the appoiniraent of the archbishops and
bishops under them. The patriarchs of Antioch, of Alexandria
and of Constantinople were appointed directly by the Bishop of
Rome, and after their consecration they acted as his delegates in
Asia, Africa, and in that part of Europe not directly subject to
Rome. Numberless historic documents prove all this.
When in 382 Nectarius was elected archbishop of Constantinople,
the emperor Theodosius sent his legates with a number of the bish-
ops of his empire to Rome asking Pope Damasus to confirm his elec-
tion, . . . . " that the Roman See might strengthen his priesthood." '
In 449 Analtolius was elected patriarch of Constantinople, but
Pope Leo the Great refused to confirm him, unless he first signed
the profession of faith laid before him by the legates of the said
Pope. When he had signed he was confirmed. Then he wished
to have Constantinople placed as first patriarchal see after Rome,
but Leo wrote to the emperor denying the request. '■*
» Boniface Lit. an. 423. Epist. 15. * gj, j^q Opera Epist. 105.
416 WHO APPOINTS THE PATRIARCHS?
When in 451 Maximus was elected patriarch of Antioch, the
«anie Pope confirmed him in his see, and appointed him the leg-
ate of the Holy See for all the churches subject to the jurisdic-
tion of Antioch. He had been elected by the council of Ephesus,
which had not been canonically held, and Pope Leo the Great an-
nulled all the acts of the synod, except the election of Maximus,
which he alone Jis Pope confirmed. At the council of Chalcedon,
some of the bishops were opposed to him, but the bishop of Con-
stantinople spoke up in the council in his favor, saying that no
act of the council of Ephesus prevailed except the election of
Maximus, for: " The most holy Leo, archbishop of Rome, received
him into communion, and gave him authority to preside over the
church at Antioch." ' In 482 Simplicius thus wrote to Acacius
regarding John, bishop elect of Alexandria, who had been elected
to that see in a synod of the clergy and laity of the church in
Egypt: "Timothy being dead John was elected in his place, and
the clergy of the diocese of Alexandria asked him the Pope to con-
firm such election.^' The Pope replying says he refuses to con-
firm such election according to the custom, because the emperor
accused the said .Fohn of perjury and therefore he revoked his
confirmation.
In 489 Acacius having died, Flavitas was elected in his place,
«,nd to Pope Felix they wrote to get his authority and confirmation
before his consecration.' When in 490 Euphemius succeeded
archbishop Flavita, without delay he wrote to Pope Felix, and
Theophanes tells us that the Pope refused to acknowledge him as
the bishop of Constantinople, because of the prior rights of
Acacius to that see, although he recognized him as in communion
with the church. In 536 Agapitus refused to acknowledge An-
themus, who was proposed by the empress for the see of Con-
stantipole. When Authemus was forced against the wishes of the
Roman Pontiff, the latter deposed him and had Menna consecrated
in his place.*
After this historic account taken from the very best and most
authentic documents, we must pass by numerous proofs and con-
clude with the words of Roussel:* "From the ancient documents
this is evident to me, that the Roman Pontiffs confirmed the pa-
triarchs of the East, which without doubt shows his Principality
over all the churches."
We may then conclude that in the East, and all over the Asi-
atic continent, the Popes in the early church confirmed or re-
jected the patriarchs, who, when confirmed, became the delegates
of the Holy See for the consecration of the archbishops, while
the latter consecrated the bishops. This confirmation of both
the patriarchs, archbishops and bishops, took place only after
they had been elected by the laity and clergy of their respective
dioceses, and in the regular and canonical order laid down by
> Concil. Cbalo. Sea. x. * Uberatus Brer. C. 18. * Lib. Brev. Cap. 21. p. 147-
* Hist. Pontlf. JuiIikUc. L. 2. no. 12.
THE FIKST ARCHBISHOPS OF EUROPE. 417
the ancient discipline. This discipline was expressed by Inno-
cent I. in his letter to Alexandrus, patriarch of Antioch: '
" Thus we believe beloved brother, that as yon consecrate met-
ropolitans with one only authority, thus other bishops must not
be created without permission and without thy authority, in
which you will rightly follow this way. If they live far away
give letters to those you judge worthy, and let them be conse-
crated according to your judgment. But for these who live
nearer, if you so think, you can go and impose hands on them.'*
Whence without the permission of the patriarch, no bishop
could be consecrated even after he had been elected by the clergy
and laity of the diocese, as appears from the words of the Pon-
tiff, and from the historic confirmations of patriarchs given above.
The Pope alone therefore confirmed the election of the
patriarchs.
In all other countries of the world, except in parts of Africa and
Europe, and in those regions of Asia known as the East, there
were no archbishops except the Roman Pontiff. To him alone
belonged the confirmation of the elected bishops. He confirmed
the election of the bishops of France, of Brittany, of Spain, of
Africa, of Italy, &c. Such was the discipline of. the first four
centuries. It was only during the centuries following that archi-
episcopal sees were erected in these countries. " The Bishop
of Eome alone was the metropolitan or the archbishop of the West
or of Europe during these times, while to the patriarchs of the
distant East, he delegated the confirming of the elected bishops,
for travelling was very difficult in these days, and it would take
months sometimes to travel from Rome to the Levant. To him
alone then belonged the confirmation of all the bishops of Europe
and of the North of Africa, as these countries were nearer and
more in direct communication with Rome.
Whence most of the early missionary bishops of Europe were
first consecrated by the Pope, and then he sent them as the first apos-
tles of these nations of Europe. When the church had spread,
and when the episcopal sees began to multiply, the archbishops
were established as branches of the Papacy, having jurisdiction over
the neighboring dioceses, and then the canon law of the church
obtained full sway. The first archbishop established in Italy was
that of Milan. That was in the days of the great St. Ambrose,
Then the next was at Aquilia. But the archbishops were to re-
ceive episcopal consecration only from the hands of the Bishop of
Rome, the only font of jurisdiction. In the year 556, when
Pope Pelagius I. ascended the Chair of Peter, this was even then
called ''the ancient custom."^
From a letter of Gregory the Great, we learn that the two arch-
bishops of Milan and of Aquilia took turns in conferring holy orders.
When Lawrence archbishop of Milan died, and the clergy and
' Apud Custant. Epist. 24. T. I. Col. 851. ' See Bacchlnus Ballerini Frat. &c.
3 See Zaccarla Antileb. T. 3- p. 138. ed. Cesenae 1770. See Frag. Epist. Pelag. T. 9. Council.
- Mansi. col. TsO.
418 WHO CONSECEATED THE ARCHBISHOPS ?
laity were about to meet to select his successor, Pope Gregory the
Great sent John, a subdeacon, to Milan to preside over the conclave
wherein they elected Constantius in his place. The subdeacon
first stated the common law, that " only the Holy See could con-
firm the election of all bishops in the world as had been the
ancieni custom. " Towards the middle of the V. century, Ravenna
was erected into an archdiocese by a privilege of the Roman See, '
but her archbishop was to be consecrated by the Pope himself.
Maurus, one of her prelates, tried to change that discipline, and
get the archbishop of that see consecrated by three suffragan
bishops, he was aided in that by the emperor Constantine. But
the schism did not last long, for under Leo II. it became extinct,
and the ancient custom again prevailed. '
When gradually archbishops had been appointed by the Holy
See in the chief cities of Europe, after they had been elected by
the laity and clergy of their respective dioceses, their consecration
was reserved to the Pope alone. But Avhen archiepiscopal sees be-
came so numerous that the labor of consecrating them was too great,
the difficulties of travelling multiplied, troubles caused by the
unsettled state of Europe, by the incursions of the barbarians, the
Holy See delegated their consecration to the bishops of their respec-
tive provinces.' By an indulgence then of the Holy See, they became
exempt from the long and dangerous journey to Rome, to receive
from the heir of Peter episcopal consecration. In Illyrico, the arch-
bishops could be consecrated only by the vicar of the Pope, who
was usually the archbishop of Thessalonica, as the works of Pope
St. Leo show.*
When in the year 491, Gregory the Great sent Augustine, the
superior of hismonasteiy of St. Andrews on the coelian hill, with
his 30 monks for the conversion of England, and the English peo-
ple received the pure Roman doctrines from these saintly men,
then many dioceses were soon erected all over the realm. Then Can-
terbury became the seat of the holy St. Augustine, who acted as
the delegate of the Pope. Gregory the Great, ever mindful of the
noble English race whose first members he had seen as slaves of-
fered for sale in the Roman Foram when he was a deacon, this
Pope erected the sees of London and York into archiepiscopal
sees, each having under them twelve suffragan bishops and diocese.
He empowered these two archbishops and their successors to con-
secrate bishops in any provincial councils which they might hold.
Yet he required them to come to Rome, in order to receive from
the hands of the Pope the pallia, the insignia of their authority
over the bishops forming their provinces.* According to that in-
dult, only the archbishops could consecrate bishops, while they
were obliged to go to Rome themselves for their episcopal consecra-
tion.*
In the early churohea of France and of Spain, we find the same
' Blanrhl Vca^XA e PoMzIa (1«11b Chlesa T. 4. L. 2. C. I. Wh-. 16. p. 285.
» ADaHtajtJiM Vita St. Leonls II. • Innocent 1. ad Alexandruni. Antloch. Constant, col. R51.
* T. I. col. oiH. » St. GreK. verba Antlfebronio T. 8. p. 150. • Honorius I.
GRANTING THE PALLIUM. 419
discipline with little change. The Popes gave power to the arch-
bishops of these nations to consecrate their suffragan bishops, in
a synod of the province subject to each. The archbishop had to
go to Rome to receive episcopal consecration from the hands of
the Pope, as in the churches of Asia and parts of Africa tlie bish-
ops received consecration from the patriarchs, representing the
Pope. But when difficulties of travelling to Rome arose, the Pope
dispensed with the voyages and appointed other bishops their
immediate primates or superiors to impose hands on them. But
the Pope never did that regarding the archbishops of Milan and
of Aquilia, as these cities were near Rome, and the cause exempt-
ing them from this journey did not exist. As it was often dan-
gerous or difficult to cross the Mediterranean sea, the bishops of
the North of Africa received the same indult, while at the same
time the Popes conceded that the archbishops of Carthage could
be consecrated in provincial council, after they had been elected
by the laity and clergy of the historic diocese of that great city
which once rivalled Rome.
Wlien by the indults received from the Holy See, the archbish-
ops, elected by their dioceses, were accustomed to be consecrated in
a provincial council, they were obliged to first get the approbation
of the Pope before the ceremony took place. From the year 743
each archbishop was accustomed to wear the pallium, coming from
the tomb of St. Peter, as a sign of the power of Peter over the
bishops of their provinces, and the giving of this insignia to the
archbishop elect was the same as the confirmation of the Pope,
^iven to the election held by the clergy and laity of the metropoli-
tan diocese. Then only were the bishops of the province called to
assemble in council to impose their hands on the candidate. In
the important selection of the archbishop, took part the laity and
■clergy of the archdiocese, the bishops of the province under the
archbishop elect, and the confirmation of the Holy See.
A German council held in the year 742 thus commanded: ""We
decree in our synodal convention, that the archbishops must seek
the pallium from that See and try to canonically follow the precepts
of Peter, that they may be numbered among the sheep given to
him."' Numerous councils and writers of the IX. century show
us that the archbishops were then obliged to ask their pallia from
the hands of the Bishop of Rome. ' Hincmar, archbishop of
Rheims, rose in an assembly of bishops, kings and princes, and
showed them the letter he had received from the Pope confirming
his election to that see. In his reply to the Bulgarians, Nicholas I.,
giving the discipline of his day, says that because of the ''long
journey the archbishops were exempt from coming to Rome, but
that they must not sit on their episcopal thrones before they had
received the pallium from the Pope." The archbishops of Ulyri-
cum could not be consecrated without the confirmation of Rome.
Numberless historic facts tell us, that even when the bishops of
* Lab. Edit. Venetas T. 8 col. 281. ' See. Hincmar Concil. Suesslonen. 11. an. 853.
420 WHAT THE BISHOPS OF ROME DID.
the early church were elected by any of the means given above,
the Bishop of Rome confirmed the candidate, either directly, as in
Europe, or indirectly by his representative or legate as in the East.
Everywhere was seen the authority of Peter living in his successor.
Such was the discipline given by the decretals of Siricius to
Himerus, of Innocent I to Victricius, of Zozimus to Patroclus,
of Celestin to the bishops of the provinces of Vienna and of Narbon,
of St. Leo to Anastasius of Thessalonica, of Symmachus to Caesar
of Aries, of Gregory the Great in his epistles, and other numerous
monuments of this early age of the church. Every historic
proof shows us the Roman Pontiff feeding the churches and
sheepfolds of Christ all over the world, all following out that com-
mission of Christ to Peter. If a dispute arose relating to any of
these elections of the bishops of the early church, it was settled
by the official decision of the Pope. Thus we read that the con-
troversy of Minicias and of Rufinus in Spain was settled by Inno-
cent I and the dispute between Sylvanus and Irenaeus and Hilary
was ended by the same Pope.
At the same time we find that many of the episcopal elections
were declared illegal, null and void by the Popes, who sent other
bishops in their places. The Holy See sent Eunomius and Olym-
pius as bishops to Africa, with letters deposing two contestants,
and with power to consecrate another candidate for the see in dis-
pute. When Ravenna became vacant, Donatus and John both
contended for the vacant throne, but Gregory rejected both and
consecrated to that see Marinianus. ' When the clergy of Ariminses
elected Ocleatinus as their bishop, Gregory the Great rejected
him, and appointed a visitor bishop to preside over a new election,
which he ordered, because of the informalities in the first election,
and he did this without communicating with the archbishop of
Ravenna, the metropolitan see to which this diocese was then
subject.
In the year 649, when the errors of the one will in Christ were
spreading over the Greek nations, Martin I. appointed John of
Philadelphia as his legate, with power of instituting bishops, priests
and deacons in the churches subject to the sees of Jerusalem of
Antioch and of other cities in the East. Not one of the patriarchs
of these old historic churches then protested, although their pre-
decessors from time immemorial had confirmed and consecrated the
bishops of these churches, for they knew that they did that only
as the delegates of the Holy See, which they knew could recall as
Pope Martm did, these delegated powers. *
The cases of such action on the part of the Popes in the early
church are so numerous, that we cannot take up space in giving
more examples. We may conclude then by summing up all we
have said thus far: The Pope confirmed the patriarchs of the
great historic and apostolic churches; the patriarchs confirmed the
primates and the archbishops within their respective jurisdiction,
1 Ei>lst. Lib. I Epist. B7. * Eplst. 6 puad Mansi T. la
REGULAR EPISCOPAL CONSECRATIONS. 421
doing that as the delegates of the Koman Pontiffs; the archbishops
approved and consecrated the bishoi^s under them, while the bish-
ops confirmed the election which took place by the votes of the
laity and clergy of the vacant diocese. In Europe, the Pope con-
secrated the archbishop elected by the laity and clergy of the vacant
^ diocese, and when the Pope could not, he was consecrated by the
suffragan bishops assembled in council. When the vacant see was
far from Eome, the Popes dispensed with the journey to the eter-
nal city, so that the archbishops of this part of the church were
consecrated by the council of bishops, after the election had been
confirmed by the Holy See. In Europe the archbishop consecrated
the bishop, when their election had been confirmed by Rome.
The laity and clergy of the vacant diocese, the bishops of the
ecclesiastical province, and the archbishops took part in all these
elections, while the patriarchs in the East confirmed these actions,
as the delegates of the Bishop of Rome. But Europe, being nearer
to Rome than the regions of Asia, the Pope reserved the confirma-
tion or rejection of bishops elect to himself, and no one was conse-
crated without his approval, for to him belonged to feed the lambs
and sheep of Christ, and to provide all the churches with pastors
according to the heart and mind of Christ, whose Vicar he was.
To him all churches ever looked as the fountain of universal juris-
diction over the whole unique sheepfold of Christ.
The great writers of the holy church, as Sts. Leo, Gelasius, In-
nocent I, Chrystom, &c., tell us that St. Peter himself appointed
the first bishops of the great churches of Antioch and of Alexan-
dria, and then filled his own See at Rome. In 494 the Roman
councils defined that: " the holy Roman and Apostolic church was
founded by no synodal institutes, but by the words of our Lord and
Saviour it received its Primacy saying: " Thou art Peter, " &c., giv-
ing Christ's words to Peter. '' Therefore the Roman Church is
the first See of Peter, which has no spot or stain or anything of
this kind.' But the second see of blessed Peter is at Alexandria
which was established by his disciple and Evangelist, for Peter the
apostle sent him into Egypt, to there preach the word of truth,
where he finished a glorious martyrdom. But the third see of the
same blessed Peter the apostle is at Antioch, which is honored by
his name because there he lived before he came to Rome.'* Thus
speaks the council of bishops of the early church assembled in Rome
at this early date.
Such has ever been the teachings of the whole christian world,
and every testimony but proves the truth of this historic fact,
which has often been proclaimed by Popes and councils in every
age. " To the patriarchs of these venerable apostolic sees, the
Popes often confirmed that jurisdiction given them first by Peter,
to oversee the churches subject to them, and to report to him at
stated times the condition of religion on the two great continents
of Asia and of Africa,. Pius VI. tells us that their authority came
- 1 Concil. Roman, held In 494. ' Pope Nicholas 1. Resp. ad Bulg.
422 HOW CANTERBURY OBTAINED THE PRIMACY.
not from the law of God, not from a universal council, not from
provincial synods, not from any agreement among the bishops, but
that it came alone from Peter the apostle, who received universal
jurisdiction from his Master.' And when in the council of Chal-
cedon, the archbishop of Constantinople, urged on by the emperor,
tried to elevate himself over the archbishops of Pontus, of Thrace
and of Jerusalem, then called Aelia, Pope St, Leo refused to give
his consent, but vetoed the 28th canon of this great council. Only
long after did Constantinople receive from Rome the honor of be-
ing a patriarchal see.
From Rome, coming with the blessing of her Bishop, came all the
bishops and priests who first evangelized Europe, as Innocent I.
says : '* It is evident that the venerable Peter the apostle and his
successors appointed priests in all Italy, France, Spain, Africa,
Sicily and the adjacent islands, and without them no churches
were established in these places."' To St. Augustine the apostle
of England St. Gregory the Great wrote: ** And because of the
Omnipotent God, and by your works, the church of the English
has come forth and increased, "We grant jon the use of the pallium,
so that in twelve places you may consecrate so many bishops, who
will be subject to your word, in so much that the bishop of London
must be consecrated by the bishops of his own synod, and from the
Holy and Apostolic See he may have the honor of the pallium.
But We wish you to send a bishop to York, send him whom you
judge worthy of consecration, so that in the neighboring places
near that city, which receive the word of God, let him consecrate
twelve bishops, and be himself their metropolitan, because he also
was your companion, and the Lord favoring, We propose to confer
on him the pallium But not only the bishops whom you con-
secrate, but those ordained by the bishop of York and all the
priests of England, the Lord favoring, We wish to be subject to
you."' From that time the successor of St. Augustine is the pri-
mate of England. Even after the deplorable schism, from the ref-
ormation to our day, the successor of St. Augustine is the primate
of the church of England.
When by the grace of God, and by the appointment of Pope Cel-
estine, in 432 St. Patrick became the apostle of Ireland, and after
he had established bishops in many cities, he still remained till
his death in 495, the legate of the Holy See for the consecration of
the bishops of the " Isle of the Saints, " the same as St. Boniface
the apostle of Germany ruled the bishops whom he had consecrated
in that country, for he too was the legate of the Pope.
In the West of Europe and the East of Asia, the bishops of the
chief cities were delegated by the early Popes to confirm and con-
secrate the bishops elected by the laity and clergy of the vacant
dioceses. Thus no bishop could be consecrated or enthroned in
any vacant diocese in the province under the archbishops of Thes-
' Phw VI. In Respon. de. Nunciat. Cap. 9 sec I. n. 8 etc * Splst. 88.
* Ureg. Mag. Lib. 12 Eplst.15.
SEATS FOR THE MONKS OF THE MONASTIC CHURCH AT WETTINGEN, BADEN.
424 THE CONFIRMATION OF THE BISHOP-ELECT.
salonica without his consent, for their confirmation was reserved to^
the archbishop of Thessalonica, who was the delegate of the Roman
Pontiffs for all that part of the church, the same as the bishop of
Aries was the delegate of the Pope for ancient Gaul, as the bishop
of Seville was for Spain. These ancient delegates of the Holy See
had great authority over the churches of these countries, for they
settle disputes among the bishops, they called national councils over
which they presided as chairman in the name of the Eoman Pon-
tiffs, and they took the place of the latter in many circumstances.
In these early days in the East, that is that part of the church
in the west of Asia, then so flourishing, now known as the Greek
church, the consecration of not only the archbishops, but also of
the bishops was reserved to the patriarchs, as the delegates of the
Bishop of Eome, who alone confirmed them, after they had been
elected by the votes of the clergy and laity of these great historic
dioceses. Thus Innocent I. wrote to the patriarch of Antioch:
" As by your authority alone the archbishops are consecrated, thus
and other bishops you will see, are not created without your
permission and your knowledge.^' ' Not only that, but it seem&
most probable, that the approbation of the Pope was required for
the consecration of even the simple bishops, except where by his-
express delegation, the patriarch or archbishop acted as the papal
delegate. Innocent I. recognized this custom, as we find by hi&
letter to Alexandrus, patriarch of Antioch cited above. In said
letter, he says that such authority comes from the council of Nice:
*' Therefore revolving on the authority of the Nicine Synod, which
with one mind explains the mind of the priests all over the whole
world. "^ We could cite numerous proofs from the councils and
letters of the Popes, and the writings of the fathers of this age to
prove these assertions, but space forbids — we have given enough
to show any fair minded reader, that the Pontiffs of Rome have
ever followed the words of Christ to their chief, Peter, to *' feed his
lambs and sheep. "
Now we come to the confirmation of bishops in the early church .
The -confirmation of bishops, whether elected by the clergy and
people, or by the civil powers representing the laity, their con-
secration was not in the early church reserved to the Popes as at
the present time. When elected by the laity and clergy of the
widowed diocese, the confirmation and consecration of the can-
didate belonged to the bishops of the province, over whom presid-
ed thearchbishop.the patriarch or primate, representing the Roman
Pontiff as given above. This discipline was given in the IV. canon
of the council of Nice, which says: ** It behooves the bishop to be
especially consecrated by all who are in the province. But if this
be difficult, because of urgent reaj^ons, or of the long distance, at
least three bishops must gather at the place, and vote in the name
of the absent bisliops, writing down the essential things, then let
the consecration take place. But all which takes place in each
> Ap. Ck>nsUnt. col. 861. * Ibidem.
THE LAITY BECAME VIOLENT. 425
province must be confirmed by the metropolitan." ' The council
of Laodocia gave somewhat the same directions. John the Schol-
astic, ' in a rubic, says that the bishop should be consecrated by
the archbishop, and by all the other bishops of the province, and
that the absent bishops should send their consent in writing.
St. Cyprian says that the election and consecration of the bish-
ops of the whole church, in his day took place by the votes of the
laity and of the clergy of the vacant diocese, and that the bishops
of the pi'ovince, at least to the number of five, came to the conse-
cration. ' Peter, patriarch of Alexandria, tells us that the election
of bishops took place in his day by the people, the clergy of the
diocese, and the consent of the bishops. * The votes of the
people in the early church were cast, not to elect the bishop, but
to propose him as their candidate, lest a pastor which they did
not want might be imposed on them. Then the clergy of the
widowed church voted for their candidate, the bishops later con-
firmed the election, and the archbishop, primate or patriarch,
with the aid of the bishops of the province, came, consecrated and
enthroned the new bishop in his cathedral, with all the ceremo-
nial customary at that time. St. Cyprian says that the clergy and
people of the diocese only voted, but that the final judgment or
confirmation belonged to the bishops, and archbishop. Sometimes
these assemblies of the people became so noisy and boisterous in
the churches, that they were a disgrace to religion. That excel-
lent author Christ. Lupus says, that they resorted to crime and
even to the spilling of blood in the churches, as the people often
divided into factions, each favoring their candidate.
Pope St. Leo forbade any one to be consecrated a bishop, who
had not received the votes of the clergy, and people of the diocese,
as well as the approbation of the bishops of the provinces, and the
confirmation of the archbishop.* Gregory the Great, in his direc-
tions to the archbishop of Eavenna, tells him to send the name of-
the person proposed by the people of the diocese, and voted for by
the clergy, to him at Rome, that he might confirm the election.
Hincmar, archbishop of Rheims in France, wrote to one of the
bishops of his province, that when a diocese became widowed by
the death of her bishop, it belonged to him as archbishop to nom-
inate a visitor bishop, to examine the candidate proposed by the
people and by the clergy, stating that it belonged to this bishop,
wlio was then interfering in the business of his metropolitan, to
simply come with the other bishops of the province to the conse-
cration of the elect. «
We conclude then that the votes of the laity were first required,
then the votes of the clergy of the diocese, then the consent of
the bishops of the province, then the confirmation of the Pope or
of the archbishop, primate or patriarch, as papal delegate represent-
ing the Roman Pontiff, These preliminary actions were required
■ » The archbishop. 2 jn jjis Collection, Tit. 7. » Eplst, 64.
* Apud. Theodor. Lib. 4. Cap. 20. « Ed. Bal. T. I. col. 1420.
426 THE ELECTION RESERVED TO THE POPE.
before any one could become a bishop in the early church. The
meetings of the people, formed first of saints with the good of
religion only at heart, became at last political gatherings, the
seats of the lowest political intrigues, of bloodshed, and of every
crime, so that by the tacit consent of the Popes, emperors, kings
and governments took the place of the people, and proposed the
candidates to the Pope or to his representative, the archbishop or
patriarch.
Such were the methods of electing bishops in the early church
before the cathedral chapters took their place, and as the senate of
the diocese, represented the laity and clergy in the election of
their bishop.
To the apostles therefore Christ left the power of appointing
bishops in this way, that while the other apostles received juris-
diction from the Lord as a personal privilege, which was to die
with them, it was to remain forever in the Bishop, who became
the successor and the heir of Peter. He alone was to feed the
church of Christ, by appointing pastors over all the churches. In
the middle ages, many abuses crept into this particular part of the
discipline of the church. Kings and princes appointed the most
unworthy persons, even the archbishops representing the Roman
Pontiff sometimes elevated unworthy candidates to the vacant
thrones of the sees within their provinces. From this rose many
abuses and grave contests, between these diverse powers and the
Holy See. The remains of that may be seen in England to our very
day, where the civil government, or the English sovereign, appoints
all the bishops of the schismatic church of England.
To reform the church from such abuses, the Holy See took an
active part, issuing many decrees. The chapters of the cathedrals
took their places as the electors of the bishops, whiile the Pope
usually confirmed their candidate, when he found that the election
was regular. The chapters represented the clergy of the diocese,
or the ancient presbytery of the church. But even then abuses
rose, and many were the contentions between the bishops and the
chapters sitting as the senate of the diocese.
Christ did not determine the way of electing the bishops. He
therefore left to the church the power to change her discipline, as
the customs and the needs of the ages seemed to require. Benedict
XII., elected to the pontifical throne in the year 1334, reserved to
the Pope all confirmations of both archbishops and bishops all over
the world, so as to put an end to the divisions and contentions on
that subject, then disturbing the church.' From that time the Holy
See alone confirms or rejects the candidates for the vacant thrones
all over the christian world, no matter by what means elected.
From that time, then the bishops were both elected and confirm-
ed by the Pope, in a public consistory or meeting of the senate of
cardinals. After they had carefully examined the qualities of the
candidate for the episcopal throne, by the numerous means at the
* Ferrarto V. Epiac. Art. 8 n. 6.
ANOTHER WAY OF ELECTING BISHOPS. 427
disposal of the authorities, the Pope chose the one he judged tlie
most worthy, and pronounced the sentence: ''By the authority
of the Almighty Father, Son and Holy Ghost, and of the blessed
apostles Peter and Paul, and by onr power. We provide for the
church, (naming the diocese) in the person of, (naming the bish-
op), and We nominate him as Bishop and pastor, and We commit
to him the fulness of power, both in spirituals and in temporals/"
Then they sent him the papal bulls, (thus called because they
are sealed with leaden balls, in Italian bulla) officially notifying him
of his appointment, and giving him power to be consecrated by
neighboring bishops, or by the archbishop, representing the Pope
at the ceremony.
The right of nominating bisiiops, which some of the christian
governments still have, as given in the agreement with the Holy
See, is not the right of appointing them, but only of nominating, or
presenting the candidate for confirmation to the Pope, to whom
alone is reserved the final confirmation and appointment. For,
not from the government, nor from the election, by whatever
way it takes place, does the "bishop get his power, buc alone from
the heir of Peter, who ever feeds the sheepfolds of Christ, the
other dioceses of the world.
The council of Trent directs that the legates, the papal nuncios,
and the neighboring bishops be asked regarding the character of
the candidates for episcopal consecration.* In another place, the
holy Synod directs that the bishops may examine into the abilities
and qualities of the candidates in a provincial council, so that the
whole matter, with the documents, may be sent to the Pope, as
well as the profession of the faith of the candidates, that the Pon-
tiff may select the one he judges the most worthy. The docu-
ments are first examined by the committee of four cardinals, who
report to the consistory.*
In May 1591 Gregory XIV. issued his famous Constitution, *
still better defining the mode of examining candidates for the
episcopacy, as given by the Tridentine council. He defined that
all relatives of the candidates should be rejected, that the nuncios
and legates should obtain the information personally, and not del-
egate this duty to others, that in places where there were no leg-
ates, the archbishop, or if he could not attend, the senior bishop
should perform the duty, that they should carefully examine the
candidates relating to their parents, their age, where they studied,
where they exercised their ministry, their success in fulfilling their
duties, &c., so that such details may be laid before the Holy See in
regular form. The documents are first examined by a committee
composed of the cardinal dean bishop, the cardinal dean priest,
and the cardinal deacon living at the papal court.
In 1627 Urbanus VIII. issued another instruction, incorporat-
ing the foregoing directions, both of the council of Trent and of
> Benedict XIV. De Synod. Dioces. L. 5 n. 3. ^ ggg. 22 de Refer. Cap. 2.
■^ Concil. Trid. Ses. 24 Cap. I de Ref. ■• Onus Apost.
428 THE PRESENT MODE OF ELECTING BISHOPS.
Gregory IV., but going more into detail in the matter there ex-
amined regarding the candidate, whether proposed either by the
civil authorities testifying how the candidates shall be examined,
the qualities of the witnesses allowed to give testimony in favor
of the candidates for the episcopacy, the population and peculiar-
ities of the episcopal city, and all things relating to the church
and diocese, to which the candidate will be sent as bishop.
In March 1631 the congregation of the Consistory issued an-
other decree relating; to the same matter, defining still better the
mode of proceeding m selecting bishops. In Oct. 1746 the great
Benedict XIV. still farther regulated the matter by abrogating
the constitutions of both Clement XI. and Urban VIII. regarding
the manner of electing bishops, with titles of dioceses destroyed
by the infidels,' but who were to be promoted to other dioceses, or
assigned to offices in Koman courts. He ordered that questions
should be sent to the bishops and prelates of Albania, Macedonia,
Servia, Bulgaria, Persia, Armenia and Egypt, that the replies
might be filed in the congregation of tl^e Propaganda to be referred
to as wanted. If the candidates then resided at the eternal city,
two witnesses were required to testify regarding them, but if they
did not live at Rome, then information regarding them "was to be
obtained in the regular way. When vicar apostolics were to be
sent to missionary countries, the questions relating to their
churches were omitted.
The three cardinals deans of the sacred college, having carefully
examined all the documents relating to the candidates for the
episcopacy, and reported the candidates they found most worthy
for the office, the cardinal relator, or chairman of the committee, re-
ports to the consistory. If the vacant see be in one of the cath-
olic nations, this cardinal relator will be the cardinal protector of
this nation, otherwise he will be delegated by the Pope for this
office. In the first consistory or meeting of the cardinals, the
relator proposes in a formal way the candidate to the Pope who
sits as chairman. The same is again done in a more formal man-
ner in the next meeting of the cardinals. Then the Pope asks all
the cardinals : " What seems to you best ?" When each card-
inal gives his opinion, if they all agree, the Pope uncovers his
head, and pronounces the form by which he confirms the election.
This was the way the candidate was promoted a few years ago, but
now the Pope himself, and not the cardinal relator, proposes the
name, and the question : " What seems to you best," is merely a
ceremony, as before the matter comes to this point, all things
have been carefully examined by the various processes mentioned
above. The vice-chancellor cardinal, who is the clerk, of the
senate, keeps a record of all the promotions, and he sends noti-
fication of his election to each of the bisliops, wlio must take a
solemn oath of obedience and fidelity to the Roman Pontiff. This
oath is usually taken by the bishop the day of his consecration.
> In Partlbiu InndeUum.
omtnTt forth from the Futlier, the eternal Son ever remains
i'^ with the Father, having in common with him all the per-
fections of the Divinity, never breaking his relations with
the other Persons of of the Trinity, coming to earth to be-
come man, the Father who sent him crowns him with the tiara of
his eternal Priesthood, saying: 'Thou art a Priest forever accord-
ing to the order of Melchisedech."*
So it is with the bishop, the high priest of that New and eternal
Testament the church, that mystery of faith, now spread through
the world, everywhere exercising the ministry of Christ in saving
the souls bought by his passion and death. As the Son came
down from his sanctuary of heaven, from his equality with the
other Persons of the Trinity, so the bishop comes forth from the
higher companionship of his brothers in the episcopacy, he comes
down from the universal church, yet he never leaves that hierarchy
of the universal church; he comes at his consecration by the
appointment of his Father the Bishop of Eome, he comes down to
the particular church of his diocese, there to become in his turn
the head of holy orders and jurisdiction in the diocese, that image
of that universal church, from which he came at the bidding of
the Pope.
As the Son in heaven has all the perfections of the Father,
from whom he descended into the world at his incarnation, so the
bishop coming by appointment of the Roman Pontiff, he bears in
his eternal priesthood all the riches of the universal church, which
^ave him spiritual birth at his consecration. As the Son ever
• Psalm cix, 4.
429
MURDER OF THOMAS-A-BECKET.
THE DIOCESE A DAUGHTER OP THE CHURCH. 431
lives ill his eternal Father, so the bishop and the diocese live in
the universal church, from which she cannot be separated, no
more than the Son can separate from his Father in heaven. As
Christ is the head of the universal church, so the bishop is the
head of the particular church the diocese. Christ is the spouse of
the universal church, and the bishop, his image, is the spouse of
his diocese, the image of the church universal. From our bless-
ed Lord the church universal receives her crown, her glory. All
the spiritual riches which he received from his Father, he gave
her his spouse. So from the universal church, the diocese receives
all her spiritual riches, her Gospel, her sacraments, her doctrines,
her rites and ceremonies, her religious principles, her salvation,
which she pours out over the souls of the dying world.
From the universal church in which still he dwells, then the
bishop receives his holy orders, his apostolic succession, his teach-
ings, his words of saving faith, his holy sacraments, his power of
ruling souls, his jurisdiction over clergy and laity, his spiritual
authority over men and his everlasting priesthood. At his con-
secration and appointment to his diocese, the universal church by
the voice of her head the Pope, gives him all these graces of re-
demption for the souls given into his charge, and now bearing all
these, he comes down from the universal church into the particu-
lar church his diocese, as the Son came down from his unseen^
Holy of Holies from his Father's eternal throne. Thus the bishop
comes to become the head of the diocese, the spiritual father of
the christians of his church. As the divine Son received his com-
mission from the Father, head of the Trinity, to become the Sav-
iour of mankind, thus from the Pope, head of the universal
church, the bishop becomes the head and the chief pastor of the
diocese, having authority to rule that part of the universal church
which is called a diocese. Thus the bishop, a member of the
episcopacy of the whole church, with Christ at their head, be-
comes in his turn the visible head of another church, the diocese,
the daughter of our holy mother the universal church, of which
she is the likeness and the image.
God then is the head of Christ, Christ is the head of the univer-
sal church, while the bishop is the head of the diocese. For the
church, being the work of the Holy Ghost, each part is a repro-
duction of the whole, following that universal law in nature, by.
which each part of any living being has everywhere the perfections
of the whole. As the form or soul of each living organism is whole
and complete in each and every part, thus the Holy Spirit extends
to every part of the whole church, and reproduces the perfections
of the whole in each church and diocese. The parish, not being
a perfect church, it cannot form itself without the bishop's
authority, or ordain ministers. The diocese has the perfections of
each and every holy order, but not of jurisdiction in the uni-
versal church.
Let us first see the nature of the episcopal office, its rights and
432 HOW BISHOPS WERE CALLED IN THE EARLY CHURCH.
dignities, then we can examine the relations of the bishops with
the diocese. He is head of the diocese and to him belongs to
superintend or oversee the spiritual business of the whole diocese.
In the early church the first bishops were called by many names,
signifying Iheir holy office, their spiritual power, or the veneration
with which they were held by the apostolic converts. According
to Theodoret, they were called apostles, that is the men sent by
our Lord to preach the Gospel, the good tidings to the whole world.
In this way St, Paul was called the apostle of the gentiles,
although he was not an immediate follower of our Lord, as he was
converted only after the ascension, yet he was the equal of the
other apostles.
In the early writers of the church we find many names given to
the bishops. They were called antistes, that is standing first or
before, as they were the leaders in the church, and stood in the
place of honor before the priests or inferior clergy. The bishops
converted and consecrated by tlie apostles were sometimes named
apostolic men. They were held as princes of the people, or princes
of the church, while the body of the episcopacy was known as the
principality of the church. Again we find them given as prefects
in the Greek fathers, or as presidents, inspectors, leaders of the
'church, the princes of priests, or the supreme pontiffs. Among
.the Greeks they were known as popes, the meaning of which is
tfather, a title later reserved entirely to the Bishop of Rome. In
their relation to the priests of their dioceses, they were sometimes
•called the fathers or the judges of the clergy.
Because of the holiness of their office they were addressed as the
most holy, most reverend, most blessed, most venerable, most
Iionorable, most amiable, most devoted, most religious, most
pious; the vicars of Christ, the angels of the church. When one
bishop addressed another, he used the words my colleague, my
brother, my co-minister, my venerable brother, &c., words still
used by the Holy See in official letters to the bishops.
In the apostolic times, the clergyman who had charge of the
church was called the bishop, that is the superintendent, whether
he was in episcopal orders or not, for among the pagan Romans
the word bishop meant the man who had charge of the public
works.' Even to this day a clergyman elected, but not yet con-
secrated may be called a bishop.
Aerius first in the fourth century, and many of the reformers of
"the sixteenth century, held that bishops are not superior in holy
orders to simple priest or presbyters, a new doctrine attacked by
St. Epiphanius, rejected by the great fathers of the church, as
well as condemned by the councils, especially by the council of
Trent.* Our Lord chose twelve men, whom he called his apos-
tles, and he promised to place them on *' twelve thrones judging
the twelve tribes of Israel." When Judas committed suicide,
lest the college of bishops should remain unfilled, they chose Mat-
> Cicero Lib. 7. Epist. ad St. * Sea. 28 can. 7.
BISHOPS AKE ABOVE PEIESTS, 433
thias in his place. The whole tradition of the church shows us
that the bishops, and not the priests are the successors and heirs of
the apostles. St. John in his Revelations directs his threatening
words to one of the seven angels of the seven churches, that is to
one of the seven bishops of these churches, threatening him un-
less he does better. They were the bishops of the churches of
Asia Minor, for in these days bishops were called the angels of
the churches.
St. Ignatius, a disciple of both Sts. Peter and John, the second
bishop of Antioch after St. Peter, in many parts of his works
mentions both bishops, priests and deacons. He says that bishops
are the superiors of priests, Avhom he calls presbyters.
We can give but one or two passages from the beautiful writ-
ings of this saint, made so illustrious by his glorious martyrdom in
107. In his letter to the people of Smyrna he says: " Let us all fol-
low the bishop, as Jesus Christ does his Father, and the presbytery
as the apostles, but let us revere the deacons, as the command
of God." * " That you being subject to the bishop and to the
presbytery, you may be sanctified in all." * Writing to his dis-
ciple Polycarp, whom St. John taught, he says: ''Look to the
bishop as God does to you. I am devoted to these who are sub-
ject to the bishop, to the priests and to the deacons, and it hap-
pens that I have apart with them in God." ' "It becomes you
to agree in the sentence of the bishop; this do. For your vener-
able presbytery worthy of God, is thus united to the bisliop, like
the strings to the zither." ^
Clement of Alexandria says: ''In the church there are grades of
bishops, distinct from the presbyters and the deacons, to whose
power and government both of the body of the presbyters, the dea-
cons and the rest of the laity are subject." * Tertullian writes:
" The supreme priest, who is the bishop, has the power of giving,
from him the presbyters and the deacons have it, but not without
the authority of the bishop." " We will not stop to give any more
texts from the early writers to show that bishops are of a higher
rank than presbyters in the church, for very few chi-istians believe
the contrary.
In the early churches established by the apostles, it was custom-
ary to carefully guard the names of the bishops, which succeeded
each other from the founding of the diocese, and the lists of suc-
cession were used against the early heretics, to show that the latter
did not come from the apostles. In these lists of ancient bishops,
they are always given as the superiors of the priests and deacons.
The names of the dead pastors of these ancient churches were
written on the diptics placed at the side of the tabernacle, so
their memories could be recalled during the Mass, for their de-
parted souls or ask their prayers. In that way the names of the first
bishops, saints and martyrs of Rome became inserted into the canon
' Epist. ad Symrnos, Cap. 8. - Epist. ad Polycarp Cap. n. ^ Ad Polycarpum Cap. 6.
- ■» Epist. ad Ephes. Cap. IV. ^ Lib. 6 Strom. Cap. 13 ed Pot. « Lib. de Fuga Cap. II.
434 THE JUEISDICTION OF THE BISHOPS.
of the Mass. The lists of the priests were not always as carefully
kept, because the succession of presbyters in a church was not of
such importance as that of the bishops, who like Aaron in the an-
cient tabernacle was the father of his clergy.
Centring in the bishop, we find the power of orders and the pow-
er of jurisdiction. The power of orders comes by holy orders from
God direct to him on the day of his consecration, by which he
can administer all the sacraments, because the bishop is a perfect
priest. Thus a bishop can ordain the clergy, which no priest can;
without any special delegation he can confirm, while confirmation
given by a priest without a special delegation of the Pope would
be invalid. These powers given by holy orders are the same
in all bishops, even the Bishop of Eome is only a bishop in
holy orders. In this the)- are superior to priests or presbyters.
But it is doubtful if episcopal consecration be an order and a sacra-
ment distinct from the priesthood.
The jurisdiction which resides in the bishop is of two kinds,
external and internal, according as it is exercised in the ecclesias-
tical courts of the diocese, or in the confessional. To the external
jurisdiction belongs the legislative, administrative, and governing
authority, that is the ruling of the diocese both clergy and people,
while to the last belongs the power of absolving from sins in the
tribunal of penance. As we have already treated on the internal
court of penance in another book, ' we will speak here only of the
external jurisdiction of the bishop in his own diocese, by which
he guides and rules the souls of the clergy and people under his
<;harge.
It is evident that episcopal jurisdiction can be granted to any
clergyman not in episcopal orders. A simple priest, elected to
the episcopacy, may govern his diocese before his consecration,
and an administrator in simple priest's orders may rule the dio-
cese in the absence of the bishop. A clergyman consecrated a
bishop, to whom the Pope has not given any diocese has the epis-
copal powers of orders, but no subjects on whom he can exercise
these powers. The Pope can restrict the powers of a bishop, so
that he can exercise no episcopal functions, at least without sin,
for although it is a disputed point whether the bishops get their
jurisdiction direct from Christ, or from the Pope, yet it is certain
that their jurisdiction, that is the exercise of holy orders, remains
tied by Papal authority. But it is disputed whether episcopal or-
ders can be given at the consecration of a bishop, without giving
him at the same time episcopal jurisdiction, at least tied by his
superior the Pope. That is, can simple episcopal orders be given
without episcopal jurisdiction?
The wliole tnwlition of the church, the councils and the writ-
ings of the fathers tell us that no one but a bishop could ever
ordain a priest or confer the major or sacred orders. ' St. Ath-
anasius tells us that Colluthus, a priest who pretended that he
" THE SEVEN GATES OF HEAVEN. » CJoncU. Trident. Ses. 83. can. 7.
THE MINISTER OF ORDERS AND CONFIRMATION. 435
was a bishop ordained Ischyra a priest. He as well as others
whom Colin thug ordained were by the synod of Isius reduced to
tlie ranks of the laity, because such orders were not valid. ' Eu-
sebius tells us that Novatus wished to become the bishop of Rome,
and asked many bishops to consecrate him, showing that only a
bishop can consecrate a bishop. St. Epiphanius referring to the
errors of Aerius, who claimed that priests were equal to bishops,
wrote: " For indeed the order of bishops is chiefly to bring forth
fathers. For this is the propagation of fathers in the church.
There is another order of presbyters, which cannot bring forth
fatners, but it brings forth sons in the church by the regeneration
of washing."^ The IV. council of Carthage ordered priests to im-
pose their hands with the bishop at the ordination of priests, but
stated that it was only a part of the ceremony, and it did not
belong to the essence of the sacrament, which is given alone by
the laying on of the hands of the bishop. The council of Nice
directed priests to impose hands on the newly ordained, because
the candidates for the priesthood were selected by the presbyters
in the early church.
It is an article of faith that the bishop alone is the ordinary
minister of confirmation. ^ But a simple priest, having been
delegated for that function, he can confirm with the chrism
blessed by a bishop. * It is disputed whether a bishop can dele-
gate a simple priest to administer confirmation, where the Holy
See has not reserved this faculty. But in case the Holy See has
reserved such power, it is certain that a bishop then cannot
delegate such power to any priest. The Pope reserves such pow-
er from all priests of the Latin rite, while in the Greek church,
where the priests confirm, the sacrament is valid for the Holy
Father tolerates such a custom. '
The bishops of the church are the successors of the apostles.
The council of Trent defines* and declares that they have suc-
ceeded to the place of the apostles. The same was defined by the
council of Florence. Such has been the teachings of the church
from the beginning, and it is found in the writings of all the
fathers and apostolic writers from the very beginning, as shown
in the former chapters of this work.
Each apostle received from Christ the fulness of the priesthood
aiid universal jurisdiction, subject to Peter the head. For we
must consider in each apostle, the priesthood, episcopal consecration,
and universal jurisdiction, because these three were given each
apostle by Christ our blessed Lord. The night before his death,
he ordained them priests by these words : " Do this in commem-
oration of me," ' words of power by which he gave them author-
ity over his body and his blood, power to offer him as the ever-
lasting sacrifice to his Father, for the salvation of the whole world
' Athuas. Tom. I. p. 193. ed. Mont. ^ St. Epiphan. Hspres. 75.
^ Concil. Trident Ses. vli. can. 3. Concll. Constan. Eupenius iv. Ad. Armen.
■* Benedict xlv. De Synod. L. 7. c. 7. n. 7. * Benedict xiv. de Synod. L. 7. c 9.
" Ses. 23. Cap. 4. ' Matthew, Mark. Luke, John.
436 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APOSTLES AND BISHOPS.
unto the end of time.' He gave them the fulness of jurisdiction,
for he sent them into the world saying: " Going foith therefore
teach ye all nations." "As the Father hath sent me so 1 also send
vou." "All power is given me in heaven and on earth." &c. This
IS the common teaching of all catholic writers, Suarez says :
"All the apostles received from Christ the Lord jurisdiction and
spiritual power in the whole church, and in the whole world. This
conclusion is certain and common among writers.'"' Some say
that Christ did not give them jurisdiction directly, but through
Peter, but the larger number of writers reject that, and say the
Lord gave that jurisdiction directly to each. ' But they were
subject in authority to Peter, to whom he gave the power of feed-
ing his sheep and lambs.
The Roman Pontiff, the heir of Peter alone excepted, the other
bishops are not the direct successors of the apostles, because they
do not sit now on the sees founded by the apostles. Tims the
present patriarch bishop of Jerusalem, in a certain way may be
called the successor of St. James as the first bishop of that city
but not as an apostle. But he does not trace the line of his pre-
decessors back to the days of the apostles, for after the destruction
of Jerusalem, the see was suppressed for many years, till re-estab-
lished by the Bishops of Rome. Rome and Jerusalem, the cities
of Peter and James excepted, the apostles did not become the bish-
ops of any cities. For this reason the Bishop of Rome alone can be
said to be the direct successor of the apostles, and therefore the
Popes alone sit on the only apostolic See.
Although the apostles received from our blessed Lord univer-
sal jurisdiction over the whole church, and the bishops are their
successors as bishops, yet no bishop except the Pope has universal
jurisdiction in the whole church the same as the apostles had.
That is the universal teachings of writers in the church. The
church has always condemned the contrary doctrine as being er-
roneous and subversive of faith. St. James' jurisdiction did not
extend beyond the limits of Palestine as ancient documents show.
St. John in the Apocalypse mentions the seven bishops of the
churches of Asia Minor, and what he says to them relates to their
churches, and his words show that these first bishops had no au-
thoi-ity over other churches of the world. The early fatlrers tell
us that each bishop of that time had jurisdiction only in his own
church and diocese, and not in the churches of other bishops.
St. Ireneus says that St. Polycarp was not only educated by the
beloved apostle St. John, but that he was also appointed by the
apostles in Asia as bishop of Smyrna. * St. Cyprian says: " A
part of the sheepfold is given to each pastor, which each one
rules and governs." *
The councils of the early ages are filled with canons and stat-
utes forbidding bishops to interfere in the dioceses and churches.
' Council of Trent Ses. SJ2. Cap. I. » De Fide Part. I. DIsp. 10 Sec. 1. n. I.
' Itttllmarmin De Sum. Pont. I. 4. C. 22. Suarez &c. * L. 3. contra Haeres. 0. 8. n. 4.
* Eplst. 55. ad Cor. Papam.
THE SOURCE OF JURISDICTION. 437
of neighboring bishops. The council of Constantinople, held in
the year 381, says: " According to the rules, he who is appointed
tlie bishop of Alexandria, will govern only in these things which
belong to Egypt, the Oriental bishops will take care only of the
Orient, while the bishops of Asia will govern only the things whicii
belong to the church in Asia." The Apostolic Constitutions for-
bade bishops to hold ordinations beyond the limits of their dio-
ceses. ' Numerous are the texts of the fathers and numberless
are the laws of the early church showing that the bishops have
not universal authority over the whole church, the same as the
apostles had, for Christ gave that to Peter alone, otherwise there
would be nothing but disputes, no order but everlasting turmoil
would reign in the church of God.
The bishops therefore are the successors of the apostles regard-
ing the powers of holy orders, that is each bishop has the charac-
ter of the fulness of the priesthood imprinted in his soul, as in
the apostles, by episcopal consecration. By holy orders therefore
each bishop of to-day has the very same power and episcopal au-
thority which the apostles received from Christ. By this the
bishops are the equals of the apostles and the superiors of the sim-
ple priests or presbyters. While the apostles received from
Christ the fulness of this episcopal consecration, and the fujness
of jurisdiction over the whole world, each bishop at the present
time receives the same fulness of the priesthood, and a particular
jurisdiction in his own diocese, but not in the dioceses subject to
other bishops.
But whether each bishop taken separately receives his juris-
diction directly from God, but subject to the Pope, or whether
he receives such power in his diocese not direct from God but
from God through the Bishop of Eome, is disputed among writ-
ers. There is no doubt but holy orders, like the other sacra-
ments, comes direct from Christ the Kedeemer, and the charac-
ter of the high Priesthood is impressed by God directly in the
soul of the bishop at his consecration, because the effects of the
sacraments come direct from God into the soul. Some writers
say that in instituting the episcopacy in the apostles, he gave
each bishop jurisdiction to the end of the world, so that at his
consecration, each bishop receives from God this jurisdiction,
which he radically has as a power, but that he cannot exercise it
till the Pope assigns him a diocese or territory, in which he can
perform his episcopal functions. The other opinion says, that
while each bishop receives at his consecration the powers of holy
orders, yet jurisdiction or the exercise of holy orders comes from
the Pope alone, to whom Christ gave the power of feeding his
lambs and sheep. The Pope gives each bishop jurisdiction,
when he appoints him to a diocese. This seems to be the more
probable and common opinion in the church. The matter was agi-
tated in the council of Trent, but no official decision was rendered.
» Can. 28.
438 THE HIGH PRIEST OF THE DIOCESE.
The church is a kingdom formed somewhat like a monarchy,
with one ruler and King, Jesus Christ, who governs by his Vi-
car, Tiie governors and rulers of any province in a kingdom re-
ceive their authority from the king, so the bishops receive their
spiritual jurisdiction from the Roman Pontifif. Thus during all
antiquity, the Pope has been called the supreme High Priest, the
Bishop of bishops, the Prince of priests, the universal Bishop,
the Fountain of authority in the church. Such is the testimony
of the fathers and early writers of the church. St. Thomas sums
them all up with his usual force, saying: "To Peter alone he
(Christ) i)romised: *' I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom
of heaven,'' that he might show that the power of the keys,
through him (Peter), was to descend to others, so as to preserve
the unity of the church." ' In creating a bishop, the Pope
closes his letter " Committing to him the administration of
both temporals and spirituals. In the name of the Father, and
of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, Amen."
The constitution of the church requires each diocese to be
ruled by a bishop as her pastor. For it is impossible for one man,
the Pope, to govern the whole world alone by himself. Hence
the council of Trent decreed: "The holy Synod declares
the fcishops are placed as the apostle says: "to rule the church of
God." ' St. Ignatius, the disciple of St. Peter, says: " As Jesus
Christ, our inseparable life, is the Word of the Father, thus
the bishops scattered to the ends of the earth are the words of
Jesus Christ. " * Thus we see that Christ wished bishops ap-
pointed in every section of the world. In missionary countries,
the Holy See first appoints a simple priest to rule a few scattered
faithful, and later the Pope appoints a bishop with one of the
titles of the old sees. When a bishop dies, an administrator
will be appointed but where canon law exists the cathedral chap-
ter rules the diocese, till the new bishop is appointed. All this
serves to show tliat the Holy See gives jurisdiction to the bishops
and pastors of the whole world, and that jurisdiction comes from
the Roman Pontiffs.
The episcopacy is the fulness of the new priesthood insti-
tuted by Christ. Aaron and the high priesthood of the Old
Testament were but figures of the bishop, the head and high-
priest of the diocese. Tlie fulness of the priesthood belongs to
the essence of the episcopacy. The presbyters or priests are not
bishops, for they have not received the completion and the ful-
ness of the priestly character. Christ did not intend to ordain
or give holy orders to the laity of each church and parish. There-
fore he established that priests would administer only the sacra-
ments required for the salvation of the souls of the people. But
the bishop, being the head and fountain of holy orders, to him
lielongs the power of ordaining the clergy for the churches of the
diocese, and therefore he must have the fulness of the powers of
' CoDtra GentM L. It. C . 7. * Ses. 23 C. 4. * £ pist. ad Epiies. Cap, 8.
THE FATHEE OF THE DIOCESE. 439
the priesthood, that he may bring forth spiritual sons, priests
like unto himself. The bishop is a higlier and more perfect
priest than the simple presbyters of the diocese. The priesthood
is common both to priests and bishops, but the priesthood of the
priest or presbyter is completed by episcopal consecration, by
which he receives its fulness and complete power to confer orders,
confirmation and to rule a diocese. The power of orders comes
therefore direct from God like baptism and the other sacra-
ments, while jurisdiction or the power of ruling a diocese comes
from the Eoman Pontiff,
The word bishop means an overseer, a superintendent and gov-
ernor of churches, over the clergy the spiritual children he brings
forth from the fecundity of his priesthood. As the Father rules
the Son in heaven, so it belongs to the bishop to rule his children,
for Christ wished the bishop, not only to ordain, but also to rule
the priests he brings forth at ordinations. From the beginning
of the church, they had jurisdiction over the churches, congrega-
tions and clergymen of the part of the church composing the
diocese under their care. The actual ruling of souls is not
essential to the office of bishop, the same as holy orders, or the
episcopal character imprinted in his soul by consecration. For
he may be a bishop and have no diocese or subjects, or he may re-
sign his diocese and take no other episcopal title. In every age
a clergyman once consecrated a bishop, was ever after considered
a bishop, no matter what diocese he had, or even if he had no
diocese to govern.
The episcopate therefore may be called the fulness of the
priesthood instituted by Christ to rule the church. For not to
the laity or to the disciples did Christ give the fulness of his
power, but alone to his twelve disciples he said: " All power is
given me in heaven and on earth. As the Father hath sent me so
I also send you. Going forth therefore teach ye all nations. He
that receiveth you receiveth me, " &c. This all catholic writers
say. No catholic writer denies that the episcopacy is the fulness
of the priesthood of Christ, and they agree in saying that Christ
Avished each section or part of the universal church to be ruled
and governed by a clergymen, with the fulness of the priesthood,
that is by a bishop, and not by simple priests or deacons. They
also agree in saying the power and effects of holy orders,
like the other sacraments, comes directly from Christ. The
larger part say that episcopal jurisdiction comes from God
through the Roman Pontiff, to whose predecessor the Lord said:
" Feed my lambs Feed my sheep."'
But it is disputed whether the episcopal consecration be a sacra-
ment distinct from the priesthood, which simple priests receive
at their consecration. To enter a little into that question, we
must first give a definition of the priesthood, which is a sacrament
of the New Law, which once received impresses a character on the
1 Johnxxl, 19.
440 PAPAL AND EPISCOPAL AUTHORITY.
soul, by which a special power is given a man to administer the
sacraments and consecrate the Eucharist. The Council of Trent
says: " By the testimony of Holy Writ, by the apostolic tradition,
and by the unanimous consent of the fathers, it is evident that
holy orders, which is given by exterior signs and words, that in
it grace is given, and so no one can doubt but what it is one of
the seven sacraments of the church. " * The apostle says: " I ad-
monish thee, that thou stir up the grace which is in thee by the
imposition of my hands."" St. Paul ordained his disciple Timothy
a bishop, and it is evident that it was a sacrament of the Church,
as decreed in the Tridentine Council. It is also certain that in
holy orders priests receive a sacrament.
The bishops who rule the dioceses, of which they have the
episcopal titles, that is of which they are the titular bishops, do
not govern their dioceses in the name of the Pope, but in their
own names as pastors of that part of the flock of Christ. This is
not so regarding vicars apostolic and other administrators;
for they govern the diocese as the vicars of the Pope. On the
one hand M. A. De Dominis held that all bishops were the simple
delegates of the Pope, and at his death their jurisdiction ceased,
which is false. On the other hand the Galican school taught that
the bishops Avere in their dioceses independent of the Holy See,
which is the other extreme. The Pope chooses the bishops to take
part in his care of souls, and each diocese has a kind of home rule
relating to matters of discipline, while from the universal church,
she gets her doctrines, her sacraments, her services and her juris-
diction, in all things acting according to the common law of the
universal church.
The Pope then appoints the bishops, giving them jurisdiction,
but they are not his vicars, nor can he remove all the bishops
at once without cause. The customary jurisdiction of the bishop
in his diocese does not exclude the ordinary and direct jurisdiction
of the Pope in his diocese, the same as the jurisdiction of the
United States still extends over all the people of any state in the
union, the same as the ordinary authority in the county does not ex-
clude the state and federal authority over the people living in that
county. Therefore the Pope can restrict the authority of any bish-
op in his own diocese, reserving to himself important cases, crimes
and dispensations. He can divide the diocese, appoint members
of the diocesan senate or cathedral chapters, or declare certain per-
sons independent of the jurisdiction of the bishop. He can send
legates, nuncios, &c., with papal jurisdiction to settle difficulties,
hear complaints, receive appeals against the bishops, &c. Not
only that, but the Pope for grave reasons can ask any bishop to
resign. He can depose him or excommunicate him, if he becomes
a heretic. But as the bishops were first established by Christ in
the persons of the apostles, the Pope could not depose all the
bishops of the world at once, and rule the dioceses by vicars, as
• Set. 88. Cap. 8. » II. Tim. I. ft.
THE bishop's relations WITH THE DIOCESE. 441
that would be contrary to the divine constitution of the church,
which the Council of Trent declares is formed of bishops, pres-
byters and deacons. We know that the design of Christ was to
give each diocese into the care of a bishop, its own pastor, who
would govern the souls there living by his own authority received
from Rome and limited alone by Rome.
Thus have we outlined the relations of the bishop with the
universal church, let us now see his relations with the diocese,
with the clergy and the laity under him. To understand that
better we must repeat a little. The diocese is an image of tiie
universal church, as the Son is the Image of his Father. Christ
is the head of the whole church, and at the same time, he is the
head of every church, and diocese, and parish. But the univer-
sal ciuirch, being like to him, invisible and unseen, Christ rules
the diocese through his chief minister the bishop. As the Pope
rules the universal church for and in the name of the Saviour as
his Vicar, so the bishop rules the diocese in and for Christ whom
he represents. For before leaving the world Christ gave to tlie
apostles all the fulness of the eternal priesthood, saying at the
last supper: " Do this m commemoration of me, " saying after
the resurrection: "^ Going forth therefore teach ye all nations,"
*' As the Father sent me so I also send you, " " He that receiveth
you receiveth me, he that despiseth you despiseth me and, he
that depiseth me despiseth him that sent me. " Having received
the fulness of the priesthood of Christ, the apostles ordained
their followers, and placed them over churches and over dioceses.
Thus that power of holy orders comes from Christ down to our
■day, and it is called orders, or the apostolic succession.
They have then the very same spiritual power as Christ him-
self, for the salvation of man. The bishops then being equal in
the church universal, whence is it that they are not the same in
authority?
One is above another because of jurisdiction and of the dio-
ceses they rule. Thus the bishop of Rome, because of the See of
Peter is by that the bishop of Rome, the archbishop of the province
•of Rome, the primate of Italy, the patriarch of the West and the
Vicar of Christ. The Elect of the clergy of Rome, becomes the
Pope, no other power on this earth can elect a Pope, or take that
■electing power from the clergy or cardinals of the Roman diocese.
The diocese being the spouse of the bishop, as Christ is the Spouse
■of the universal church, the clergy of the diocese should present
the bishop to the Pope for confirmation, as the wife alone can choose
her husband, and without her consent the marriage is invalid. To
Rome, to the rules and customs of the See of Peter, the whole church
looks for example, faith, discipline and government. Therefore
the other dioceses of the world should copy after Rome, for to that
diocese of Rome the Lord said in the person of Peter: '^ Thou art
.Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my church and the gates
•of hell shall not prevail against her." The clergy of the Roman
442 THE DIOCESE OF ROME EVEELASTING.
diocese, in the persons of the chief clergy of that diocese, that is
the cardinals, elect their Bishop, who by that becomes their head
and Vicar of Christ, tlie Pastor of every soul redeemed by him.
No authority on eartii but the Koman clergy can elect a Pope. All
tlie bishops, priests, clergy and laity, all the governments of eartli
without the cardinals could not elect a Pope, for to them alone it
belongs to select their Bishop.
The Roman diocese, consecrated by the teachings of Sts. Peter
and Paul, and hallowed by their blood, never fell away from the
faith, because its Pastor is the eternal Rock on which the Lord
built his church. As every other diocese is but a copy and an
image of her, whose bishop is the Vicar of our beloved Redeemer,
so every church and diocese should copy the forms and modes of
action of the diocese of Rome, and each bishop should be guided
by the benignity and example of the Bishop of Rome, through
whose mind the Holy Ghost teaches the world by word and ex-
ample.
The diocese has all the perfections of the church universal, inas-
much as these religious things are wanted for the salvation of souls.
But the diocese of Rome alone excepted, no other diocese is immor-
tal, because to her where it is possible the Lord said: *'Thou art
Peter and upon this Rock I will build my church and the gates of
hell sliall not prevail against her." Eternal years are hers, and
alone amid the ruins of the ancient world, she stands imperishable
as the human race, because she is the diocese of Peter. Christ
sees that his prophecy is being fulfilled each year and age, " For
the gates of hell shall never prevail against her," because she is the
seat of the Papacy. Without tlie Popes then, Rome would have
long ago met the fate of Babylon, of Carthage, of Memphis, of
Palmyra and of the great cities, whose extensive ruins in silent but
in eloquent words now proclaim their former greatness.
All the higher perfections of the body are in the head, so all the
sanctity and graces of the universal church center in Clirist, from
which they flow down in silent but invisible streams into the souls
of the men he redeemed. So all the virtues perfection and graces
of the whole diocese should be found in the bishop. Not from
men or from tliis world did Christ receive his Godhead and his
perfection, but alone from his eternal Father, from whom he came
into this world to become the head of the church. Not from the
diocese but from the church universal, from whom he comes down
does the bishop receive his holy orders and his autbority over
the clergy and the laity, whom he spiritually brings forth, teaches,
rules and sanctities.
Therefore, coming from the universal church, of which he is a
pastor, the bishop comes down into his diocese, bearing all the
perfections of his eternal priesthood, an image of that Son of God
our blessed Redeemer leaving his Father's throne and coming to
this earth, to become the head and father of the regenerated hu-
man race. Thus from that hierarchy of the bishops, whose father
THE BISHOP IS MARRIED TO HIS DIOCESE. 443
is the Bishop of Eome, the bishop comes as another saviour of his
clergy and people. He lays his consecrated hands on the best of
his students, and thus he brings them forth by the Holy Ghost,
priests like unto himself, workers with him in the vineyard of the
Lord. In the bishop then the diocese has the fulness of the eternal
Priesthood of Christ, his Gospel, his Bible, his sacraments, his
Body, his Blood, with all the riches of Christ's redemption. In
and by the universal church, the bishop lives and moves and has
his being, as in the Son in heaven lives in his Father. By the mys-
tery of that union of the diocese with the bishop, one of the
daughters of the universal church becomes a complete church, an
image of our blessed mother. The diocese therefore becomes
espoused to the bishop, whose episcopal ring is but an image of
that union. The parish priest wears no ring, because he is pastor
of an imperfect church, the parish, whose supernatural life lives
only in that higher and more perfect church the diocese. The
parish priest does not sit on a throne judging one of the twelve
tribes of Israel, for his power mostly relates to the internal and
secret tribunal of penance, while the bishop is a pastor of the uni-
versal church, having both internal and external jurisdiction in
his diocese. The bishop brings forth his spiritual children, sons
and daughters from the fecundity of his everlasting priesthood in
the administration of the sacraments, which he receives from the
universal church, whose canon law rules and guides his every
move and action. Such then is the mystery of the mystic marriage
of the bishop with his diocese.
The family is founded on the union of man and wife in the
sacrament of marriage. But in the new and redeemed humanity
of Christ, the universal church rests on a spiritual marriage of
Christ with the universal church, and the bishop with his diocese
and the pastor with his church. But that union of the bishop
and of the pastor with their churches, by which they bring forth
their spiritual children unto Christ, are but so many images of
the wonderful wedding of Christ with his church universal.
The diocese is espoused like a chaste virgin to one man, the
bishop, for and to whom she continually brings forth spiritual
children to the Lord. The dioceses are the "sheep*' of the
flock of Christ ever bringing forth lambs, of whom he said to
Peter and to the Popes: "Feed my lambs. Feed my sheep."
Then to the bishops and to the dioceses we can say: " They adhere
to the heavenly mysteries founded on the divine stability." '
Let us deeper penetrate the mystery. The diocese is in the
bishop, the bishop is in the universal church, the church univer-
sal is in Christ and Christ is in his Father. " He that receiveth
you receiveth me, and he that receiveth me, receiveth him that
sent me.'"*
Thus as the Lord Jesus is the husband of the universal church,
which is now unseen like unto himself, so the bishop is the hus-
> St. Cyprian De Unitate Eocl. n. 6. » Mark ix. 36.
444 THE BEAUTIES OF THE DIOCESE.
band of the diocese, that part of the invisible church which
he rules in the name of Christ.' As the whole church centres
and becomes personified and visible in the Roman diocese, so
each diocese should be an image and a faithful copy of the
diocese of Rome. Each bishop should be an image, a likeness
and a copy of the Roman Pontiff. Whence it follows that those
parts of the church which in former times copied better after
Rome, became stronger and more powerful to keep the faith
and to resist the attacks of the revolutions of past ages. Thus
we see that Europe, which from the apostolic age copied the
canons, the customs of the Roman diocese, the Missal, the
Breviary Ritual, the Pontifical and the Roman Rite and Ceremo-
nies, thus enlightened Europe, blessed by Noe, still retains the pure
faith taught by the Chair of Peter, while the Greeks and the
Orientals in Asia, who preserved the other venerable Rites, easily
and early fell away from the faith and perished by revolutions
and the inroads of the Mohammedans.
Not only that but the bishop is the father of the diocese. " For
the bishops have the power of enlightening, because they imitate
the Father of lights, and abundantly they have his power,"' In
heaven are the Father and the Son, who is generated from him,
and from both proceeds the Holy Ghost, and these three are one.
On earth we have the bishop and the clergy of diocese, w'hich by
holy orders proceed from him, and with the laity these three are one.
They form the diocese. With the Father and Son is the Holy
Ghost. With the bishop and the clergy are the people. The
Holy Spirit is the bond of union between bishop, clergy and the
people. The Holy Spirit is the Soul of the diocese, as he animates
the universal church.
Then from the depths of eternity the Father sends his Son to
redeem the fallen race. He comes into the world, and from him
and from the Father comes the Holy Ghost, to gather together
all the children of men, to bring them forth in baptism, born for
Christ as his children unto everlasting life.' As from that
higher hierarchy of the* Holy Trinity comes the Son and Holy
Spirit into the world, so from the higher hierarchy of the bishops
of the universal church, the bishop comes into his diocese. So
the pastor of the parish comes down from the hierarchy of the
priests of the diocese to the parish, all bringing the glad tidings
of the Gospel of salvation to fallen man. All is order in the mys-
teries of God, Christ the eternal Son comes from the heights of
the most holy Trinity, the church universal proceeds from Christ,
the diocese descends from the universal church and the parish is
born of the diocese, and the people are born of the parish '* of
water and the Holy Ghost." *
Thus the Persons of the Holy Trinity come from heaven into
the church, that they might unite man with them in this world,
and that union with God is to be finished with them in heaven.
> Sum. Tbeol. Suppl. 9. xl. a. 7. * Simeon Tbea. * John Till. 42. * John.
THE MODEL BISHOP. 445
''I am in the Father and the Father in me," * "and j^ou in me
and I in yon,"* " I in tliem, and thou in me, that they may be
made perfect in one, and the world may know that thou hast sent
me."' As the Persons of the Holy Trinity are one iii nature, so
Clirist and the diocese are one in nature. For the church is
formed of the race of Adam redeemed by Christ, who being God
became a son of Adam, to redeem and save his race by the church
of which he is the head. As Eve the wife of Adam came from
the side of Adam, so the church was born of Christ, so the diocese
was born of the universal church at its erection by decree of the
Pope, so the diocese is the spouse of the bishop, so the parish is the
bride of the pastor.
As all tlie senses of the body are in the head so all the wisdom
learning, prudence and sanctity are in Christ the head of the
whole church, and so they should be and in tlie bishops who pre-
side over parts of the church of Christ. Thus Christ is the only
begotten Son of the Father. Being the Image of the Father
he is eternal Wisdom itself. He is the Teacher of the universal
church. The bishop being the head of a particular church, the
diocese, he is the teacher of the clergy and laity of the diocese.
For that reason the bishop should be the ablest, most learned
among the clergy, so that he may be the brighest mind in the dio-
cese. At the same time he should be a saint. In the elec-
tion of bishops, the electors of the chapter should look to the
learning of thecandidates, and elect a man of God like to the bish-
op of our souls Christ Jesus. For Christ as the Son of God is
full of the Holy Ghost. He is the source of all the holiness
which flows down on men. * From his sacred wounds comes all
the sanctity of the church. The bishop being the husband of the
diocese or particular church, he should be also " full of grace
and truth,"* like unto Christ, For that reason holiness and
sanctity should abound in the bishop. For in what would men of
learning without holiness differ from professors in college, or fallen
archangels, whose minds are exceedingly bright, but whose wills
have become depraved ?
Following then these rules of the church, inasmuch as the
pastors and the rulers of the church approach Christ in learning
and in holiness, as they ascend thrones of power in the church,
they will merit mansions of glory in heaven.
As the whole church centres in Christ, so the sanctity and
learning of the wliole diocese centres and becomes personified in
the bishop of the diocese, and the whole parish lives in the pastor.
For that reason the church preserves those old and venerable
dioceses of the East now overrun by the Infidels. 'J'hese fallen
churclies now live and exist in the persons of -the titular bishops
of these ancient dioceses, without subjects. All the powers of
holy orders, the virtues of the clergy, the holiness and the sanctity '
of clergy and of people, the perfections of fallen dioceses now exist
' John xiv. 10. » John. xiv. 20. 3 John xvii. 23. * St. Bernard. » John 1. ,
446 heaven's glorious image.
and live in a higher degree in their titular bishops, ornamented
and as it were crowned with tlie f nhiess of the Priesthood of Christ.
Thus by a special privilege many clergy of the Roman diocese, the
coadjutors of bishops, the administrators of vacant sees, the vicar
apostolics, and all titular missionary bishopfc have the titles of these
ancient dioceses once so flourishing, now overturned by persecu-
tions and by the ravages of wars, they still live in these bishops,
as all the property and the titles of a princely family may live in
the person of the only living heir, when all the others have passed
away in death.
But we must consider the bishop in the midst of his clergy
and people on his episcopal throne. "Judging the twelve tribes
of Israel. " What a spectacle for angels and men to see the whole
diocese around the throne of the bishop they selected and ele-
vated to that office, and which represents to them the throne of
the Most High God ruling the souls of men.
In heaven the Father has his Council, his only begotten Son,
who ever comes forth from him. So the bishop in his diocese has
his council, the chief members of his clergy, who are so many
images of himself, and who came from him by rite of ordination
and by appointment. As the Son partakes in the authority of his
Father, and sits on his eternal throne with him, so the bishop has
his council, his senate, his legislature, for the government of the
diocese his church. They form the presbytery of the diocese.
They are the venerable senate of the diocese. In completely or-
ganized dioceses they form the chapter of the cathedral. Being
the chief members of the clergy, they aid the bishop in the ad-
ministration of the spiritual affairs of the diocese, they govern the
diocese in his absence, and at his death they elect his successor. In
this they imitate the venerable college of the cardinals of the
Roman church.
The bishop is the head of the diocese, as the Father is the head
of the other Persons of the Trinity. He is the father of both
clergy and people, born of him and of the diocese his spouse, which
comes from him like Eve from Adam and is the fruit of the fe-
cundity of his priestliood.
What a sight to see the diocese complete in all the splendors of
the beauty of the perfect church, bearing in its bosom the perfec-
tions of the church universal. The Saviour suffered for the uni-
versal church, that he might unite to her his virgin spouse, still
unspotted ever rejoicing with everlasting youth, immortal over
all the earth, bringing forth to him his cnildren unto everlasting
life, preparing to unite with him in the splendors of the skies. For
that spouse of the Lamb of God, ever coming forth from his side
pierced on Calvary, is crowned by him as his Queen in heaven,
and now she sits with him on his throne of glory. From Calvary
then as his virgin, she comes forth a universal church, the bride of
Christ, everywhere giving birth to his daughters the dioceses of
the world, espousing them to bishops, who rule them in the name of
THE BISHOP SUliROUNIJED BY HIS CLERGY. 44?
Christ, who is espoused to the universal church, of which the
best part is in lieaven rejoicing with him after their victory over
the world, the flesh and the devil.
Wiiat an image of tl>e glories of heaven and of the universal
church, we see wiien the bishop pontificates, surrounded by his
clergy and his people, who have elected him to the episcopal tin-one.
The lights of immortal trntli come forth from the Son of God.
The sanctifying grace comes forth from the Holy Spirit. Tlie clergy
come forth from the bishop, and the laity come forth from both
bishop and clergy by the saving ordinances of the holy sacraments
of Christ. And all these comedown in silent, unseen streams from
Christ in the ministry of the bishop " full of grace and truth." '
See in the bishop an example for both clergy and people of Christ
who is the bishop of our souls the head and the husband of the uni-
versal church.
The bishop is also an image of the Pope the infallible head
of the Roman diocese and the Vicegerent of Christ. The bishop
but reflects the teachings of the Roman Pontiff. Coming down
from the universal church, he brings with himself the spiritual
lights and graces of his head the Pope. In his turn he teaches these
by word and example his clergy, the pastors of the diocese,
who carry from hini the glad tidings of the Gospel of redemption
to the people of their parishes. Then the bishop sits on his epis-
copal cliair on the Gospel side, as one of the "' Judges of the tribes
of Israel." lie sits on the Gospel side as he is the chief teacher of
the Gospel in the diocese. The priest in his parish sits on the
Epistle side, for he is not the chief teacher of the diocese or of
the people, nor does he speak against the will of the bishop.
They teach not worldly things, but the revelation of God in the
Bible founded on the stability of the divine decrees at the founding
of the church, while civil governments are founded on the chang-
ing politics, on the passions and the ambitions of men. Let the read-
er study the history of nations, and of the efforts of men to estab-
lish a stable government in the place of Adam their natural father.
What wars, rebellions, insurrections, changes, upheavels ! What
sorrows, misfortunes, calamities and divisions have not taken place
in nations, in governments and in the politics of men, since the begia-
ing of the world, when they lost their natural ruler Adanv y^ho. by
sin lost his kingdom. But there is one government, that of the
church universal and her centre and heart, the Roman diocese,
which because of her peculiar relation to the universal church
rises above the chsinges and the mutations and the misfortunes of
this earth. The Roman diocese alone excepted no other diocese is
immortal and eternal. They may die out as they have not the
promises of Peter to withstand the gates of hell like the universal
church, and the diocese of Rome. Yet the other dioceses are
themostperfectimagesof the universal church, and for that reason
they partake in part in her immortality. Even when the people and
> John 1. 12.
448 SHE COMES BLESSING ALL 3IEN.
the clergy of the diocese fall away, the diocese still lives in the per-
son of her titular bishop, working in some other part of the world as
an assistant bishop a vicar apostolic, or at Konie, in some of the con-
gregations, aiding t!ie Papacy. Even after the diocese has died out
as many of the great chuiches of the East were swept from the
earth, they have been fruitful mothers of the children of God, for
their clergy and laity now sing the pra'ses of the " Lamb of God "
before the eternal throne. They have added to the external glory
of God; they have gathered up the harvest of the Lord; ar.d they
have accomplished their missio.i on earth. Perhaps their light is
only for a time obscured by infidelity or revolution, and that in
after ages the people of these countries, now in the hands of the
heathens or Mohammedans, will be called again to the faith of their
fathers, and the great dioceses of the East will once again flourish
as they did in the early ages of the church. They are at least sad
lessons of the chastisements and punishments of God, when he
takes away the light of faith, as said to the churches of Smyrna, of
Ephesus and of the East.'
But alone above the changes of time, because she is the spotless
spouse of the Lamb, the church universal is eternal, immortal and
unchangeable. She repairs the loss of dioceses, of churches and
of souls by ever engrafting, assuming and incoiporatij)g into her
organism, the other peoples "sitting in the darkness of death.'*
Thus throughout the ages, the church universal travels from place to
place; like her husband who when on earth had no resting place,
she is ever an exile and a traveller on this earth, ever rescuing souls
from the demon, who goes around *' like a lion seeking whom he can
devour." When the nations and the peoples receive her, as they
received Jesus Christ her spouse, she teaches them, she sanctifier
them, she civilizes them, she protects them, she raises them up to
a higher level, she brings them forth sons of Christ her spoiise, by
the ministry of her clergy, and thus she fills heaven with the scat-
tered members of the lost race of Adam, who born of her become
the children of the new Adam Jesus Christ, because born of the
church universal his wife by the waters of baptism and the Holy
Ghost. Everywhere the universal church works through the dio-
ceses its instruments. She blesses the earth, the land, the people
and the nation Avhere she passes, driving out the "prince of this
M'orld " from the minds of men, whom he had before led to infidelity
and idolatry and deceived from the foundations of the nations.
But woe to that race, nation or men who will not receive the church.
'• For the nation that shall not serve thee shall perish.'*' And
when a people will not receive the church represented by the bish-
op and the clergy, then let them shake the dust off their feet, and
leave them to their darkness, and when they persecute them in
onecity they follow the words of the Master and " flee into another.'*
Then the church universal flourishes and grows strong when the
particular churches, the diocese and the parish flourishes. This
> Apor.il. < Ia»ia«.
THE BISHOP AND HIS CLERGY. 449
shows that the church is of heaven, and that she does not really
belong to this world but to heaven, where her spouse Christ now
lives in " the splendors he hud with the Father before the world
was."
The diocese with the bishop alone cannot make a perfect church.
For froni the fulness and the pei'fection of the priesthood of the
bishop, come forth and are spiritually born the priests of the diocese.
He forms, ordains and appoints them at the proper time to rule
parishes within tlie diocese, as he was by his bishop the Pope ap-
pointed to rule a diocese, one of the great parishes of the universal
church. The pastors of the diocese then in some manner foi'm the
presbytery or the senate of the diocese, as the cardinals, the Pastors
of the Roman diocese, compose the senate of the universal church.
As Jesus Christ comes forth from his Father, as he is the eternal
Council and the Image of the heavenly Father, so the priests com-
ing from the fecundity of the eternal Priesthood of the bishop are
the images of the bishop, so they are the council of the bishop.
The diocese is tiie spouse of the bishop, and she has all the
spiritual fruitfulness of a virgin mother. She brings forth spirit-
ual sons to the bisliop. They are the clergy of thedio(!ese. They
are, as clergymen, the images of the bishop. Not only that but
the bishop gives the last perfection to his diocese, by forming aud
ordaining the lower ministers of the priests, the deacons and
lower clergy. They are to be the aids and the helpers of himself and
of the priests. The wife is also a man, the female man, the bone
of his bone and flesh of his flesh, of the same race with him, equal
in nature to her husband. By her he brings forth his children
his images, members of the race like unto himself. So it is with
the diocese. She is the spouse of the bishop, as the universal
church is the spouse of Christ. The church universal is equal to
Christ, her spouse, for no beings can generate others like unto
themselves. excei)t by tlie union of another of the same race, like
themselves their equal in nature.
The whole diocese then is like a spiritual family and rests on
the bishop, from whom both clergy and laity proceed. But
the bishop's office rests on the eternal Priesthood of Christ. For
because he has received the fulness of tlie Priesthood of Christ
he is a bishop. For if he had no holy orders he would be a lay-
man. Then the whole foundation of the particular church or
diocese is Christ. He is the ' ' Rock of Ages" on which every church
was built. Without him, their Redeemer, they would be built in
the ail", aud they would soon fall. The elernal Priesthood of
Christ in the bishop is the whole foundation of the diocese, as the
foundation of the universal church is in the Pope the successor
of Peter.
The mission of the bishop and of all pastors is an extension in
time of the eternal mission of Christ, coming from his Father in
time to this earth to save mankind. The mission of Christ
has three elements — to teach truth found in the Gospels, to sanctify
450 THE BISHOP A TEACHER AND SANCTIFYER.
son Is by the sacraments, and to govern men by the common ecclesi-
astical law. We have seen that the church universal has received
from her founder Ciirist these three powei-s of teaching, of sanc-
tifying and of governing souls. Being the image of tlie universal
church, the diocese has in the bishop these three powers. .Coming
down from the higher hierarchy, the head of the universal church,
the bishop brings these three powers to the diocese, tliat by them
he may teach, sanctify and govern both clergy and people, whom
he brought forth from the diocese by the ministry of his eternal
Priesthood.
Then the bishop first begins by being the teacher of the diocese.
Without faith it is impossible to please God. But how can
they believe unless they are taught, and how can they be taught
without a teacher ? How can the teacher come unless he is sent ?
The bishop is sent by tlie universal church, as the pastor is sent by
the bishop. By his teaching, then the bishop first lays down the
foundation of the christian religion which is faith. Then the
people first begin by listening to his teachings. For Christ first
taught his apostles before he sanctified them by his passion. The
pagan unbelievers first come to hear him before they are baptized.
For he is not their pastor at first but their teacher, even before
they come into the " Kingdom of God by water and the Holy
Ghost."' Even after their baptism the bishop continues to teach
them the ways of eternal life. Whence the bishop must either
preach or get a priest to do so. The foundation of religion is
faith. The Son of God is the Word of the Father. He is eternal
Truth. The bishop teaching truth to his people feeds them on the
Son who is the Truth of the Father by teaching them the Gospel
truths. But the bishop or the clergy are not their own strength.
They are infallible teachers only inasmuch as they teach the
truths in revelation explained and interpreted by the Vicar of
Christ the Roman Pontiff. Then the bishop and clergy of the
diocese must live in union with the Pope, whom alone the Lord
keeps from error, because he is his Vicar and speaks in his
name.
But the office of bishop is not alone to tench the members of his
diocese. For teaching alone belongs to a school, a college where
minds are trained. But after educating, instructing and teaching
them, the bishop must sanctify his people by the sacraments in-
stituted by Christ, and by that infusing into them from his eternal
Priesthood the Holy G host, the Spirit of God the Son. By preach-
ing and teaching they become enlightened. Thus from all these
holy sacraments the Christians, membei-s of the diocese, receive
grace and power and strength, all flowing from the fountains of
the Saviour.
But the bishop is the chief minister under Christ of all these
sacraments. For he too is but the minister of Christ. By virtue
of the fulness of the eternal Priesthood of Christ received at his
> John 1.
THE BISHOP AS A SANCTIFIEB. 451
consecration, he administers these saving ordinances to the souls de-
prived of grace by the sin of Adam.
At tlie Altar he stands the mediator between God and man, not
because he is a man, but because in the diocese lie is tlie chief min-
ister of Christ. At the altar he stands saying Mass, distributing
the Body and Blood of Christ to the clergy and to the people.
There he breaks the bi-ead of life. There he blesses the Holy Oils.
He sits on his episcopal throne, clothed in the royal purple and
gold of ancient kings, surrounded by his clergy like buds of
roses, while the people fill the nave of the great cathedral. Thus
the Roman Pontifical as well as the Apostolic Constitution say
that: "It belongs to the bishop to offer sacrifice and to consecrate. ''
At the altar the bishops ever opens anew the wounds of Christ, and
the fountains of grace flow from "he superabundant merits of the
Crucified Lord. Thus the bishop showers down unseen redemp-
tion from Calvary, and pours graces by the sacraments into the
wounds of human souls gasping for eternal life.
To typify the power of the prayer of the bishop at the altar, to
show forth his office in all its beauty, the church says that when
the bishop says a pontifical Mass, he will have his assistant priest,
his deacons of honor, his deacon and subdeacon of the mass. All
wait on him, to give dignity to such high and sacred functions. On
the great feasts or Sundays, the diocese by him offers up to God
the eternal F'ather through Jesus Christ the praises and the thanks-
givings of the clergy and people. The cathedral itself was built as
it were to write in wood and stone in a visible image the frame-
work of the diocese, the form of the episcopal ceremonies. The
throne of the bishop tells of the episcopal power to judge that tribe
of Israel, that is the christians of the diocese to whom the Roman
Pontiff sent him. As one of the successors of the apostles he
teaches from the pulpit. The sanctuary filled with clergy and
brilliant in light tells of heaven. The nave speaks of the christian
world, and the porch typifies the pagans living in the spiritual
darkness of death, because they have not yet come into the light
of the Gospel. When the bishop sits there on his throne on the
Gospel side, no other bishop can occupy it, even his assistant bishop
Bits on the Epistle side, for the bishop of the diocese alone is head
of the cathedral, the husband of the diocese which can have no other
husband, till he is removed by death or by the Roman Pontiff.
What a spectacle for angels and for men to see the diocese blos-
soming forth in all its beauties, perfections and grandeurs Sundays
and holidays at the offices and the prayers of the liturgy of the
Roman Rite. The bishop sits on his episcopal throne. Near him
his vicar general. Along each side of the chancel sit the canons
of the cathedral. They form tlie senate of the diocese, an image
of the Roman diocese and of the august college of the cardinals
with the Roman Pontiff at their head. There to the cathedral
.chancel come the bishop and the chapter morning and evening to
sing the glories of God in the divine office. The harmony of the
462 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PRAYERS.
church music, as beauti6ecl by St. Ambrose and reformed by the
first Gregory, floats out from the sanctuary. The custom of the
great choirs of the ancient temple of Solomon, and the harmonic
music heard by Moses and Aaron still lives in the majestic liturgy
of the churcli. No works tiie writer ever saw are like the beauties
of the Roman liturgy. To see a diocese in all its grandeur is a sight
which leaves an impression on the mind which lasts forever.
When a person prays, he oifers up his heart to God as a private
person. But if when two or three unite in prayer, God is in the
midst of them, what must be the power and the force of the
whole diocese, praying througli their bishop and their clergy recit-
ing or singing the divine office in the cathedral. But that is not
all. The divine office said by a clergyman in any rank of holy orders
above a subdeacon is tiie prayer of Christ himself. As St. Ignatius
says: " If the prayer of two or three has such power, what will be
the prayer of the church and of the bishop? " * That Mass and office
of the bishop is the prayer of the whole church, the spouse of Jesus
Christ. Of that prayer of the diocese and of the episcopal Mass St.
Cyprian says: " The great sacrifice offered to God is the peace of our
meetings, and the people united to their Father, and to the Son,
and to the Holy Ghost."'
There when the bishop pontificates you see the image of heaven,
where the angels and the saints ever stand before the eternal throne,
praising and blessing God, through Jesus Christ the only Mediator
of man. Clothed in white garments, washed in the " Blood of
the Lamb ''slain from the foundations of the world," the choirs
of heaven ceaselessly sing the hymns of glory and of praise, as they
bathe in the light of perfected reason and of glory outflowing from
the eternal throne. The bishop, the clergy and people singing
the praises of the Lord in the cathedral and in our churches, form
80 many images of the heavenly abode of bliss. But the clergy
and people being men, cannot forever sing the songs of joy, or ever
chant those prayers unto God. For they must rest and sleep and
have their diversions, because they have a body of earth which must
seek repose. But if they are not present all the time in the churches
as angels and saints are in heaven, they at least mav be present in
spirit. Although these beautiful offices of the church, by the
reformation, were driven from the great cathedrals of England", and
although they have ceased in many parts of Europe, yet the bishops
and the clergy have to privately say that office, that prayer of the
church, each day under pain of mortal sin. Whether united with
the bishop in the chancel of the cathedral, or taking his place at
the head of the parish, or in choir, the clergy and the bishop are
one when saying the divine office. And the" people are one with
them when saying their beads and private prayers, inasmuch as
they all belong to the diocese and to the universardiurch, and they
all pray through Jesus Christ, who sits in glorv on the eternal
throne, ''always interceding for us." Then the divine office is
» St Ign. EpiBt. ad Epii. n. «. ■ aL Cyprtan de Orat. Doin. n. 28.
MYSTIC MEANING OF THE LITL^RGY. 453
the prayer of the diocese and of the universal churcli, and every
clergyman from the subdeaeon to the Pope must say that office
every day, and when they recite its holy words, the whole church
with Christ at the head prays through them.
God called the laity to take part in these sacred functions of the
Roman liturgy, that divine service transcendent over all others.
For in former times, in the early church when the people under-
stood Latin, they took an active part in the divine offices. The
hymns of praise then came not only from the sanctuary but from
the laity of the whole church. As the apostles formed tiiese offices
from the Bible in the Latin tongue, the offices of the church were
for the ear of God alone, and the church cannot now change them.
What the clergy say to the people they speak to them in their own
language. But the laity should take part by congregational
singing in these great offices of the church. Li this way they can
enter into the spirit of the ditt'ereut offices during the year. For
the church oifers to God through Christ, "the thoughts and the
desires of all; the ti'oubles of the people, the dangers of nations, the
groans of captives, the misfortunes of orphans and of those witliout
homes, the pains and the weaknesses of the sick and of the wound-
ed, the feebleness of the old, the desires of the young, the vows of
virgins and the tears of widows and of orphans. " '
Almost in the very days of the apostles, St. Ignatius wrote:
" The church is a choir and the bishop presides at her concerts,
Avhich are like the choirs of heaven, which cease not day or night." "
Again he says that: " The church is a harp, with clergy and peo-
ple united to their bishop, like the strings of a lyre, tied to the wood
of the instrument, which binds them together, and in that union
of souls and of voices, on that lyre of the church, the Holy Spirit
sings to Jesus Christ. "*
As Jesus Christ gives spiritual life to his church by the Holy
Ghost, his Spirit, who comes from him, and builds and forms the
whole church organism, so the bishop by the Priesthood of Christ
of which he has the fulness, the bishop by his ministry sends that
same Holy Ghost into the whole diocese. Whence, as Christ is the
head of the whole church, so the bishop is the head of the whole
diocese. For as the bishop is a living man and an image of Christ,
and as tlie diocese is the material image of the invisible chur3h
universal, so the workings of divine grace in the diocese but
copy or typify the workings of the Holy Spirit in the whole
church, and in the souls of the members of the diocese. As
the Lord Jesus rules his universal church by the constitution he
laid down for the whole church, at its foundation on the apostles
and on the prophets, so the Vicar of Christ lays down the consti-
tution of the diocese. If the diocese falls away from the divine
model seen in tlie constitution of the universal church, and in
the constitution of the Roman diocese, M'hich has ever preserved
* St. Ambrose Orat. ante Mlssaai In Mis. Roman. * St. Ifrnatlus Epist. ad Ephes. n. 4.
» Ibidem.
454 MYSTIC MEANING OF THE LITURGY.
unchanged the '' deposit of faith " and the frame-work left by
Peter, it belongs to Peter's Successor to bring back the diocese to
apostolic customs.
As the Pope, the Vicar of Christ, rules the whole church, not
for himself but for the Lord, whose church and bride she is, so
the bishop rules the diocese, not for himself, but for the Jesus
the spouse of the church universal, he who bought these precious
souls with the price of his passion and his blood. For that reason
the bishop cannot do everything he wants to. He must follow the
laws and the canons of the church. He must not change any of
the laws of the universal church. He keeps to the traditions of
the apostolic age. He must live in peace with his clergy and
with the people, for the Lord hath called us in peace and not
in continual quarelling and contention. For the Holy Spirit
is not in the whirlwind, not in the storm, but in the still small
voice of the Gospels. Whence if the clergy and people are con-
tinually disturbed, they cannot grow in holiness, but in that case
the devil will soon find a way of destroying the sheep fold.
But to each diocese belongs home government. For the con-
ditions of peoples, and of nations, the customs of countries change
from age to age, and from nation to nation. And that the laws of
the universal church may be accommodated to the changing condi-
tions of men, each bishop in his diocese has the triple authority
of making laws for the diocese, of judging the guilty and con-
demning them to spiritual punishments stated in the laws, of ex-
ecuting the laws of the church, and of regulating financial, dis-
ciplinary and temporal matter. Then the bishop makes laws for
the diocese, gives decisions as an ecclesiastical judge, and enforces
and executes the laws both of the whole church and of the diocese.
The bishop is not free in doing this. For he too must follow the
laws of the universal church, — the canon law enacted by his Bish-
op the Roman Pontiff. The Roman Pontiff too must follow the
constitution given by Christ to the apostles and found in the reve-
lation as known by tradition. The statutes or laws of the diocese
are promulgated by the bishop in the diocesan synod, as the laws
of the universal church are made in the Ecumenfcal councils. In
matters relating to the home government of the diocese and the stat-
utes of the diocese are not sent to Rome for revision, as they relate
not to faith or morals as the statutes of the bishops of a province in
provincial councils or as the bishops of a nation in a national
council.
Each age, each country has its time of peace, or persecution, its
customs, aspirations, peculiar dangei-s and temptations. For that
reason the diocese is small in extent, so that the bishop and the
clergy may make laws to meet these new and changeable traps and
snares laid by Satan for the destruction of souls. The manners of
people, their diverse conditions, theirsocial standing, their educa-
tion vary from generation to generation. And the church, the
diocese and the parish, coming from God, with all his authority
MYSTIC MEANING OF THE LITURGY. 455
in spiritual powers, comes and seeks these remains of tlie race of
Adam. Bride of God, Queen of heaven, she passes through tliis
world of exile, seeking tlie members of the fallen I'ace. The
christian lives in this world, while he does not belong to this
world, but to heaven where his Ijord and Master dwells in glory
waiting, that " where he is there may his people be. "
The bishops and the pastoi's of souls, with prudence apply
these laws of the universal church and of the diocese to the vary-
ing conditions of the people. Every act of the bishop and of the
pastor is laid down in the canons and the laws of the church. They
should follow these laws in all their dealings with the people and
Avith the clergy of the diocese. Nothing is left to the arbitrary
whim of tlie bishop, or of the pastor, or of the priest dealing with
matters relating to the salvation of souls. For the whole church
is a vast spiritual government, with Christ at the head having un-
der him his ministers. We have seen in a former work (Man the
Mirror of the World), how God rules every creature of the world
so that it acts and moves and lives. And to change one of these
natural laws is a miracle, so the bishop rules the diocese, not ac-
cording to his whims and moods, but according to the laws
laid down in the canon laws of the church, enacted in the coun-
cils or by the Roman Pontiff. If troubles arise in the church, it
is because some of these laws have been broken, and the oppressed
is looking for justice.
THE PARISH PRIEST ADMINISTERING COMMUNION.
jM»s»»iia«!»iJ«i«?if»i!r»«^^^
dROM tlie society of the Father and Holy Spirit comes the
Son down to earth, to become the liead of the nniverpal
chiircli. He has no eqnal on the earth for he belongs to the
liierarchy of the Holy Trinity. From the Roman Pontiff
Vicarof Christ comes the bishop, down he comes into the diocese
from the hierarchy of the bishops of the nniversal church, find-
ing not his equal in the diocese, but among the bishops of the
nniversal chnrcii. Thns he comes into his diocese to become the
head of holy orders and the font of jurisdiction for the whole dio-
cese. Again from the hierarchy of the priests of the diocese comes
the pastor into his parish, as head of his church and congregation.
Bishops and priests therefore come down from the ranks of the
hierarchies to which they belong, berj-ing with them the teaching,
the sanctifying and the ruling powei-s Avhich Christ bore from
heaven, and with which he sent them forth as the Father had sent
liim.
Therefore we must consider the bishop as the chief teacher, sanc-
457
458 TEE BISHOJ* AND THE CATHEDRAL.
tifyer and rnler of the diocese, bearing in his person tlic truths of
the Gospel, the sanctifying powers of Christ, the authority of the
whole church; tlierefore lie rules both clergy and laity whom he
brings forth as his spiritual children, and he rules both laitv and
clergy for he is their spiritual father.
Peter chose Rome as his eternal diocese from among all the
cities and dioceses of the whole world when Christ had establish-
ed the universal church. So when the diocese, the image of the
universal church is born of her by appointment of the Pope, the
bishop comes into the city of his see and chooses one of the church-
es as his cathedral, there he erects his spiritual throne, fi-om which
he judges that tribe of Israel given into his care. The relations of
the Bishop of Rome to the Roman people differ from his relations to
the other dioceses of the world, for he is the titular Bishop of Rome.
The relations of the bishop to the people of the cathednil parish differ
from his relations to the other parishes of the diocese. As the
Pope is not the titular bishop of all the other dioceses of the world,
so the bishop is not the pastor of all the other parishes of the dio-
cese, but he sometimes is of the cathedral parish. As the Pope is
the Vicarof Christ, and has direct and immediate jurisdiction over
every soul redeemed by Christ, so the bishop has a supervision
over the parishes and people of the other parishes of the diocese,
80 that if the pastors do not attend to the spiritual wants of the
people, the bishop supplies them. Thus there are other pastors
in the diocese, who rule their churches and parishes in their own
pastoral rights, because they have the titles of these churches.
But the relations of the bishop with the cathedral do not change.
Other parishes of the diocese may rise or fall, pastorsand priests may
move, other dioceses may be formed out of the territory, or diocese
may be united or added to the diocese making it larger, but the re-
lations of the bishop to the cathedral ever remain the same. No
matter what change or upheavels may take place in the diocese or
whether it may become the see of an archbishop, the relations of the
bishop with the cathedral remain the same. He will lemain bish-
op of that see, as the Pope will ever be the Bishop of Rome, nor
can the See of Peter be ever changed from the eternal city, and
Christ will always be the Pastor Eternal of the universal church,
individualized and visible in his Vicar.
The Bishop of Rome appoints certain bishops of important sees
as archbishops, primates and patriarchs over the other bishops
and churches. They are representatives of his complete power.
So the bishop appoints other pastors with a part of his jurisdiction
over the other churches and pastors of the diocese. They are the
rural deans, and they have a certain supervision of the finances and
condition of the churches in their deaneries.
We read in the Gospel of the establishment of the Papacy in
Peter and of the bishops in the apostles. At the last supper Christ
ordained his apostles priests, later he consecrated them bishops of
his universal church, while the council of Trent says that Christ
THE bishop's powers LIMITED. 459
also ordained priests and ministers, and the Acts of the apostles
tell us of the ordination of the deacons. But we find but few
and dim traces of the priests or presbyters of the church. Why do
not the evangelists and writers of the New Testaments give the
priests ordained by Christ more prominence ? Their silence shows
all ages, that our blessed Lord built his church on the Papacy and
on the episcopacy, so as to take away all danger of the parishes or
priests separating from their bishop and from Rome, and founding
separate communions, independent of the universal church and of
the diocese. That false principle carried to its extreme is found
to-day in the Baptist, Presbyterian and other churches, who claim
that each congregation is independent of all other congregations.
The bishop then, a pastor of the universal church, comes down
from the universal church, never leaving that everlasting and
wonderful organization founded by our blessed Lord, he comes in-
to his diocese, bearing with him all the doctrines, teachings, sac-
raments, authorities and. powers of oi'ders and of jurisdiction over
the clergy and laity of his diocese. He has all the spiritual riches
of the universal church, and these he deals out to his spiritual
children his clergy and laity, the fruit of his complete priesthood.
Butasthelimitsof the powers of the Pope in the universal church are
bounded by the revelations of God, and by the divine law revealed
to man, so the powers of the bishop and his actions are regulated
by the laws of the universal church, by her canons and her statutes
made by the Pope in councils, and issued in his constitutions,
briefs and letters. The bishop must proceed according to the
canon law, as the Pope must obey the divine law, as Christ the
Son acts according to the eternal laws of his divine nature re-
ceived fi'om his Father. We will treat therefore of the duties
and obligations of the bishop in this chapter.
As the Pope has supreme legislative authority over the whole
church, so the bishop has legislative power over all the members
of his diocese. He can therefore make laws for the diocese, and with
severe spiritual punishments he can chastise those who refuse to
obey these laws. He can suspend the clergyman and excommu-
nicate the lay person who will not obey the laws he makes for the
diocese. ' Laws made at a synod last till revoked, but the
legislatrve enactments made by a bishop outside the synod probably
cease at his death or resignation. But no bishop can make a law
which conflicts with the common laws of the universal church.
For they originated with the Pope, or they were made in a council,
which by the Pope's apjiroval became common to the whole church,
and the bishop cannot make any law in conflict with the superior's
statutes. When a custon prevails in a diocese, Avhich is con-
trary to the common law of the church, the bishop may act ac-
cording to this old custom, for custom makes law, but his cannot
make any law agreeing with a custom contrary to the uni-
Yersal church, because he has not the power to go contrary to the
> Benedict xiv. L. I 13. C. 4. n. 5. De Synod. Dlo.
460 THE BISHOP AND ROM AX LAWS.
universal law. ' For that reason when the acts and decrees of
provincial councils, confiictiiig with the universal laws of the
church are sent to Rome for review, the congregation always
repeals such things. Each diocese is more or less free regarding
home discipline, and therefore home rule prevails in each diocese.
For the bishop alone does not define matters of faitli and prac-
tice, for that belongs to the Bishop of Rome, who alone has the
note of infallibility, which belongs to no other bishop in the
world. But the bishop in his diocese sees that the doctrines of
the universal chnrch alre.idy proclaimed are believed by both
clergy and people. Bnt he cannot act as jndge about things agi-
tated among theologians, nor decide dispntes in matters relating
to the whole church, for he is not infallible, nor can the bishop
punish a clergyman who will not agree with him in such things.
The laws made by the Pope for the universal church oblige in
the diocese nnder pain of sin, before the bishop accepts them, for
they come from his superior. Bnt the bishop can give the
reasons why the pontifical laws cannot be introduced into the
diocese, and the laws may then be suspended till the bishop receives
the reply from Rome. But if the reply from Rome states that
the reasons are nut enough, then the law of the universal church
obliges and has fnll force in the diocese. But this rule can be
applied only to some, but not all pontifical laws. The laws of
the Pontiff obtain their full force all over the world, when they
are promulgated at Rome, although in some countries and at di-
verse tim6s the Popes allow the bishops to examine and approve
the papal laws before they promulgated them in their dioceses.
This is like a concession to the bishop, lest it might be difficult to
carry out the laws of the Roman Pontiff, or lest they might be-
come oppressive for any peculiar or local reasons. But the Holy
See will not consent that the Roman law for the universal church
does not oblige, unless the bishop consents. But often Rome
does not insist, lest the bishop may have peculiar local reasons,
which arise in his diocese. The bishop then cannot examine and
pass judgment on apostolic letters and laws, before allowing them
to be enforced in his diocese. On the contrary he would greatly err
in subjecting papal decrees to his judgment. If he j)ievented
their execution, he would be excommunicated, as Clement VII.
says. '
The church is so careful lest her laws might become oppressive
in particular cases, that she gives dispensation, by which a law,
which binds all, is taken away for this particular case. The same
power which made the law can alone dispense it. Thus the
Pope alone, who makes laws for the church universal can dispense
them for the whole church, and the bishop can dispense only
liis own or his predecessor's laws for the diocese. The general
rule is that the inferior cannot dispense in the laws of his super-
ior. Some authors say that the bishop can disjwnse in all the
* BeoHdlct xtr. De Synod. L. 12. C. 8. d. 8. " Const. 47 T. 4 p. I.
THE BISHOP GIVING DISPENSATIONS. 461
laws of the Pope, except where the Pope reserves such dispensa-
tions to himself in a special manner, while others are reserved in a
special manner to the Pope. The more probable opinion is that
no bishop can give dispensations in laws for the whole church,
made either by the Pope alone, or by the Pope in the councils,
because the inferior cannot repeal, or wipe out the laws of his
superior, and because the giving of a dispensation is an act of
jurisdiction, and the bishop has no jurisdiction over the Pope,
nor over his laws. Besides if every bishop could thus interfere
with papal laws,these laws would become useless, the Pope would
not be the Pastor of all the sheepfolds of Christ, as the Vatican
council declared. The Holy See gives the bishops power to dis-
pense in certain laws, as the keeping of feasts, the regulations of
lent, in laboring works on Sundays, fasting, &o. Many of the laws,
made in the universal councils and by the Pope, directly state
that the bishops can dispense for certain reasons. Even custom,
which Rome tolerates, gives the bishop the power of dispensing,
for custom makes law. When there is danger in delay, or when
^rave necessity urges, the bishop can grant a dispensation, for
necessity knows no law. Law M'as made for the good of souls and
when therefore any law becomes oppressive, the people would be
led by it not to eternal life, which is the object of all church laws,
but they might sometimes be inclined to break these wise laws
and commit sin. The church ever seeking the good of her mem-
bers, wishes not to enforce a law which good in most cases, may
become oppressive and hurtful for a few, and in such occasions
the church allows the bishops to dispense in church laws.
The law being universal for all people, and a dispensation being
a taking away of the law for one or more cases or persons, there
must be a good and valid reason for granting a dispensation. For
these wise laws, having been made by the bishop's superior for
the universal church, he must act with reason in giving dispensa-
tions. The bishop may grant a dispensation without any reason in
the laws of the diocese, made by himself or by his predecessor, and
it will be valid for what the same power did it can undo.
According to these rules the bishops have the power of dispens-
ing in the laws relating to fasting, and from abstaining from
manual labor on feast days. If there be doubts about the cause
for granting such dispensation, the bishop may change the fasting
to some other work of piety. In special cases, and for one or more
occasions, he may dispense a person from the general law of fast-
ing, for special reasons and for the furthering of works of piety.
But Benedict XIV. ' decreed that bishops could not dispense
for their whole flocks in the law of fasting, and he gave them au-
thority of so dispensing that year in the said law regarding the
feast of St. Mathias. By the common law a pastor can dispense
his people from the law of fasting, in particular cases but he can-
not dispense all the people of the parish.
1 Bull Tom. 3.
462 WHAT DISPENSATIONS HE CAN GIVE.
The church in the early ages made a law forbidding laboring-
work on Sundays, which the whole christian world has since ob-
served. The Pope can dispense in that law for the whole world,
if there be a just cause the bishop for the diocese. But if he were
to do so without any reason, it would be a great sin. A parish
priest can give such a dispensation for particular cases, and for a.
few days, when his parishioners cannot see the bishop.' All this-
relates to fasting from food, for it is harder to fast from food than
to abstain from meat and other kinds of food.
But the bishops cannot dispense the laws relating to abstaining
from meat and white meats, such as milk, cheese, eggs, &c., for
these things are regulated by the common laws of the church re-
lating to lent, advent, &c. But the Pope has given special facul-
ties for dispensing, unless the law reads that a dispensation may
be given; when the case is urgent; when there be danger in a de-
lay; when the bishops are accustomed to give such dispensations,
and Avhen there is a doubt regjirding the power of the bishop to-
grant such a dispensation. But for good reasons the bishops can
dispense in these laws for particular reasons. As it is impossible
for such persons to apply to the Holy See and wait for an answer^
the custom is to apply to the bishop.
The law obliging us to abstain from meat, &c., during Lent was-
made by the universal church, and it is customary for the bishop*
to give particular persons dispensations from this law, because it
would be impossible for each one to address the Pope asking for a-
dispensation, when weakness, disease, or other reasons make them
incapable of keeping the law. Even inferior prelates, administra-
tors of dioceses, and parish priests may dispense in these laws.
But no bishop, without an indult from the Pope, can give a dis-
pensation for the whole diocese, for the bishop cannot take away
the common law of the whole church even in his own diocese, except
in the cases stated; otherwise the laws of the whole church would
be nullified. As the natural law is the foundation of all laws,
the physician can declare that the law of fasting does not exist
for those whose health does not allow them to fast. But no
one can declare any diocese or multitude of people free from the
laws of fasting as Benedict XIV. says." But any widespread dis-
ease or raging epidemic in a country or diocese, or the difficulty of
getting fish, eggs, butter, oil, cheese, &c., is enough to give the bish-
op cause to dispense in the Lenten fasts of the church, as Benedict
aIV. says. But if a contrary custom exists in any diocese, and the
Pone knowing it says nothing, we must conclude that he agrees
ana that it is allowed.
The bishops cannot give dispensations relating to the sacred rites
and services of the church, nor can he change any of them, as that
belongs to the Holy See. But the bishop may dispense from the
laws of the diocese, which were enacted either by himself or by his
predecessors, for the same power which made laws can take them
* St. Llsory L. 3 n. 1032, 288, &c * Bull. Ubentlaslme Tom. I n. 130.
CHURCH AND STATE EIGHTS. 463
away, except in the case where these diocesan laws have been
specifically approved by the Pope, in which case they are approved
and strengthened by the bishop's superior.
But whether the bishop can do in his own diocese, what the
Pope can do in the whole church, except these things specially
reserved to the Holy See, is disputed by authors. But the best
authors say the bishops cannot do that. For if bishops could
do so, they could take away all the acts of the councils, the decrees
of Popes, the laws of discipline, and overturn the whole common
law of the universal church ; whereas most of the laws of the uni-
versal church say that the bishops are forbidden to abrogate, repeal
or dispense them for their own dioceses. The opinion which holds
that bishops can do so is contrary to the teachings of the great
masters. ' As we have seen the Pope is the ruler and administrator
of the universal church, and the bishops are under him as well as the
other clergy and laity, for the council of Florence and of the Vati-
can defined, that the Pope has full and direct Jurisdiction overall
pastors and people, because he is the Vicegerent of Him who re-
deemed all men.
The council of Trent states that any man who accidentally com-
mits murder, even if it be secret, that he can never advance to holy
orders. If in defending himself from an unjust attack on his life,,,
he takes life, his bishop, his metropolitan or a neighboring bishop^
may dispense him so he can be ordained. In all other irregulari-
ties or suspensions arising from secret crimes, the bishop omi
dispense, says the council of Trent. *
The governments of the world have often invaded the church,
persecuted her, stole her property, and trampled on her most sacred
rights. The division of churches was caused by such unjust usur-
pations. The church is a perfect and complete government and
society, and to lier alone belongs the sacred things given into her
hands by Christ for the salvation of the human race. All spiritual
things, as the sacraments, articles of faith, divine worship, &c.,
belong to her alone, and in these things the people or the govern-
ment has no control. " The rulers of nations are her sons, not her
rulers, and they are saved by her like the people they govern.
According to the laws of the church, the clergy are exempt from
being cited before the civil courts, but liable before the courts of
the church. It is disputed whether they derive this from the divine
or from the church laws. But in very few countries are these
things now carried out. Benedict XIV. tells bishops to try and
hold their rights over purely holy things, and that it would be
useless for them to try to regain the full freedom of the church,
such as she had in the middle ages. Who could count the millions
of property, which the governments of the world stole and confis-
cated from the church?*
1 Suares L. 6. de Leg. C. 14. n. 4, et6. Benedict. XI V, de Synod. Dioces. L. 9, C. I. n. 5.
2 Ses. 14. C. 7. Ses. 24. C. 6. » Benedict XIV. De Synod. L. 9. C. 9. n. 2.
* De Synod. Dioces. L. 9. n. 11. et 12.
464 LITURGICAL BOOKS AND CHAPELS.
The bishop has not legislative power regarding the liturgic books
of the church, such as the Missal, the Breviary, the Ritual, &c., as
that belongs to the Pope. The Missal and Breviary edited by Pius
V. must be used in all churches where the Latin Rite prevails, and
no other liturgical books less that two hundred years old from the
time of his edition can be used, without a special indult from the
Pope. Many of the dioceses formerly used new editions, which
had been changed from the authentic Roman books, and they were
becoming very corrupt, when Pope Pius V. published new editions
revised and modified of the liturgical books, which conformed with
historic books of the Roman diocese. Therefore the bishops of
the Latin rite cannot use any other kinds of liturgical works, which
originated later than two hundred years before the publication of
the Brief of Pius v.; neither can they change anything in these
books, nor in the ceremonies of the church. The same may be
said regarding the office of the Virgin, the Martyrology published
by Gregory XIIL, and corrected by Benedict XIV., the Pontifical
used by the bishops and the Pontifical Ceremonial followed in
episcopal ceremonies. It is not so clear regarding the Roman Rit-
ual, for authors commonly say that each diocese may keep or have
its own Ritual, although thecontrary opinion is also held, that if the
rites are praiseworthy and approved, that is, that all belonging to
the Latin Rite when they make a change they should adopt the
Roman Ritual. The appointing of days of obligation for feasts
belongs to the Pope, as well as the suppression of feasts of obliga-
tion. We see that according to the request of the III. Council of
Baltimore, Leo XIIL suppressed some of the feasts, which before
that council were held and celebrated in this country holy the same
as Sunday.
The bishop can forbid certain kinds of music in the churches, or
the singing of the services in the modern languages, as thelTridentine
Council says.' The bishops regulate the pew rents and modes of
raising moneys for the support of the churches in his diocese."
A public chapel or oratory is one that has a door opened for
the public, and that is exempt from private ownership. Only
by the awthority of the bishop can such a chapel be erected and
Mass said in it. The Blessed Sacrament is reserved for the sick in
parish churches, and It cannot be served in private chapels without
"the permission of the Pope, unless a long custom gives such per-
mission.* But the colleges, hospitals, chapels of monks, convents
•of nuns, &c., are exempt from that law.* From the most re-
mote times bishops have had private chapels in their houses, where
ihey have been accustomed to say Mass; and the council of Trent,
ivhich forbids Mass to be said in private chapels, exempts such
Masses in the private chapels of episcopal residences. Each bishop
may have a portable altar, and he can say Mass on it in any house,
either in his own or in another diocese, when travelling, even
• Ue Evltand. In Celeb. Mis. * 8. Congregatio Rlt.
» Benedict XIV. Const. Quamvis Justo 30 April. 1749.
* Qsrdlnal Petra Tom. III. ad Congt. Urbaoi IV. n. 15.
RELATING TO MAERIAGE. 465
without the consent of the bishops of the diocese in which he stops. *
That is a very old custom, which neither the council of Trent nor
the decree of Paul V. revoked." In the private chapel of the bish-
op, any one may hear Mass on Sundays and holidays, and satisfy
the obligation either by saying or by attending the services there,
for the palace of the bishop is not a private house.
Before the council of Trent the bishops used to give permission
to say Mass in private oratories or chapels. But that council took
away this permission and reserved it to the Pope, who alone cam
give the permission of saying Mass in private chapels. Nevertheless-
for just causes, the bishop may give such authority, for example in
the case where otherwise the people could not hear Mass on Sundays^
and holidays, where the custom exists, as in Ireland and in mis-
sionary countries, or where there are no churches. The law was-
made by the council to prevent abuses, and relates only to the per-
petual use of such a private chapel in private houses, but not to
occasionally one or two Masses, or in case the owner is sick, dis-
abled so that they cannot attend the parochial Mass. Hence the
council of Trent did not entirely take away this permission,
but rather restricted it.' The decisions of the congregation re-
lating to these things do not include the chapels of seminaries,
colleges, monasteries, convents, &c., for these are public not private
chapels. The superiors of religious orders have the faculties of
allowing Mass said in the chapels belonging to the members of
their orders.
At his coming Christ took the natural contract between man
and wife and elevated it to the dignity of being one of the sacra-
ments of the New Law. A sacrament is a holy ceremony, giving
grace coming from the fountains of the Saviour. To the church
alone all holy things belong, and no other power can interfere in
holy rites and sacraments for they are of God made by him for
the sanctification and the salvation of souls bought by the blood
of the " Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world. ^'
Marriage is a holy union between man and woman, an image of
the ineffable and fruitful union of Christ with his church, which
never will be dissolved. All things then relating to marriage be-
tween christians belong to the church, and the interference of the
secular governments in marriage matters works to the destruction
of souls, the disturbing of civil society and ruin of the family.
The church being the guardian of the family, the upholder of
every government founded on right reason, the church protects
society in its very origin and foundation, the marriage tie. For
that reason the church made wise laws relating to the marriage
contract, and the sacrament of marriage founded on the contract.
The promise of marriage is a contract between two parties capable
of marrying, and it i*s founded on the natural law, like other con-
tracts into which the church does not enter. Therefore the bishop
- * Boniface Vin. Quoniam De Previp. ^ Benedict XIV. Encycl. 4, et 5.
* Card. Petra Tom. 3 ad Const, viii. Honorii iil. n. 10.
466 MARRIAGE IMPEDIMENTS.
cannot give a dispensation releasing the parties from a valid engage-
ment, when one of the parties is unwilling to release the other.
If before the wedding, one of the parties take a vow of entering a
religious order, or makes a vow of prepetual chastity, tlie bishop
cannot grant a dispensation, for the Holy See has reserved this.
The party has promised God to enter a more perfect state of life,
and only the Pope can release him according to the words of our
Lord : ' ' Whatever thou shaltbind upon earth it shall be bound also
in heaven, and whatever thou shalt loose upon earth it shall be
loosed also in heaven."
Marriage between a catholic and a baptized heretic is forbidden,
because of the danger of the catholic party or of the children be-
ing perverted to the religion of the other. In this case the bish-
op cannot dispense, as that is reserved to the Holy See.* That
law was made in the council of Chalcendon, and relates to the
universal church, over which the bishop has no control, the Su-
preme Pontiif alone having the power to dispense in the general
laws of the church." But as St. Ligory says, in many cases tiie
custom is for the bishop to grant such dispensations. Besides the
Pope delegates to the bishop the power of giving such the per-
mission, on the condition that the catholic party will have full
liberty to follow his religious duties; that there be no danger of
losing the faith; that all children shall be brought up in the
catholic faith. In all other impediments forbidding or impeding
marriage the bishop can dispense.
But there are other impediments which not only impede, and
because of which the marriage is forbidden, but which render the
contract entirely null and void. Before the nuptials, the bishop
cannot grant such dispensations, and the congregations of the coun-
cil and of the inquisntion have often condemned the contrary
opinion. But in secret cases of great urgency, the bishop may give
a dispensation so the parties may marry. Even after the wedding
the bishop can give the dispensation, when the impediment is
secret, but not when it is well known. Even sometimes, in very
extraordinary circumstances, the pastor might declare that the laws
of the church do not oblige, but when possible he may apply to
the bishop for a dispensation. As the sacraments were made by
Christ for the whole church, and to the whole church belongs the
autiiority of regulating them by its laws, the bishop cannot make
any law or impediment rendering marriage null and void. Urban
Vill. approved a degree of the congregation forbidding bishops
to do 80. Nevertheless not only the bishop, but the parish priest
for a reasonable cause may forbid a marriage. A marriage with-
out the consent of the parents is forbidden but valid. If tlie ob-
jections of the parents be frivolous, the marriage is lawful as well
as valid, for tiie parents often object for tiie most foolish reasons.
The Holy See gives authority to missionary bishops to grant dis-
' Benedict xlv. De Synod. Dloc. L. 9. C. 3.
* Natalia Alexander Tbeo. Do^mat. T. II. Art. 8.
468 DUTIES OF BISHOPS TOWARDS STUDENTS.
pensations for nearly all impediments of marriage, reserving to the
Pope only the most important impediments. The way to obtain
a dispensation is to apply to the pastor, who will communicate
with the bishop.
We now come to the dealings of the bishop with the most import-
ant persons of the diocese, the clergy, and we will begin with the
priests, both of the diocese and of the religious orders, before they
are ordained to the priesthood. The bishop is the superior of
all the clergy in the diocese, that is of the students for the min-
istry, who have acquired a residence in the diocese before they
became clerics, who for three years have partaken at his table, or
who have been received by him coming from another diocese.'
The councils, especially the one held at Trent, say that they must
look to him for ordination." This relates to all clerics below
priesthood studying for the ministry,— each must be ordained by
either his own bishop, or if by another bishop with letters from
his own bishop. This law was to prevent candidates or clerics-
from wandering from one diocese to another, so that the bishop
may be able to judge who are the worthy candidates for holy or-
ders. This was decreed by so many councils, that we cannot give the
decrees now. The bishop therefore must not ordain clerics wan-
dering from place to place without letters from their bishop, for
as St. Paul says the bishop must not impose hands lightly on any
one. If the student were born in another diocese or place,
but lived for a time in the diocese of the bishop, so that
he acquires a domicile or residence in the bishop's diocese,
the latter can ordain him.' If for three years the cleric has exer-
cised the ministry in the diocese, and if within one month before
the ordination, the bishop grants him a benefice or means of
living then he can ordain him.* But the bishop who would ordain
a stranger, without the consent of or letters from his bishop, for
one year would be suspended from episcopal functions, and the
man he would ordain would be suspended as long as would seem
right to his own bishop.
A bishop may give another bishop authority to ordain one of
his subjects, even the vicar general can do so when the bishop i»
away, or cannot act, but without his express consent the latter
cannot do so when the bishop is at home. When the see has been
vacant for a year or more, the vicarof the chapter can grant such
letters, * and within eight days after the death of the bishop, the
chapter is obliged to appoint the vicar for the administration of
the diocese, and to him all jurisdiction belongs. Patriarchs,
primates, archbishops, &c., cannot give such letters or ordain the
subjects of their suffragan bishops, or give them letters so the
other bishops may ordain them, because their powers relate
to jurisdiction over them on appeals, and not to holy orders.
Students who live for four months in Rome cannot be ordained by
I Boniface rlJl. an. 1299. » Concil. Trid. De Ref. Cap. 8. 8es. ?8.
* Con&t. Spec. Innocent xil. Sec. 13. * CoDCll. Trtdeut Ses. 23 C. 9. Const. Citat. D. 18.
* Concil. Trident Cap. 10. Sea. 7.
LAWS RELATING TO ORDINATIOJST. 469"
another bishop, even when they have letters from him, but for
ordination they must present themselves to the cardinal vicar of
the Pope. When the bishop gives letters to one of his students
to be ordained by another bishop, it is not enough to give only a
testimonial of the student's good character, but the letter must also
give permission to another bishop to ordain him.
No one should be promoted to holy orders unless he can be
supported in an honorable and decent way, lest disgrace be
brought on the clergy and the priesthood. Neither can he resign
his benefice or office, unless there be some other way of supporting
him because: "Those who serve the altar should live by the
altar " says St. Paul. The clergy are supported by the revenues
of the mission or parish they serve, by their own inheritance or
by the religious order to which they belong. When they live on
the revenues of ihe parish or mission, the bishops regulate the
amount or maintenance they are to receive each year from the parish.
It is generally the same for all the priests of the diocese. But if
they live on the revenues of their own property, they cannot
sell or alienate any of this property without the consent of the
bishop. ' Only those whom the bishop selects should be or-
dained, for he is the judge of the wants of the churches of his
diocese. " The clergyman who would deceive his bishop regard-
ing his property, so that he can be ordained to the title of his
patrimony when he has none, becomes at once suspended.
Although tonsure may be conferred at any time on any day,
and the clergy may be promoted to minor orders on Sundays and
feast days, yet the regular ordination to the higher orders should
take place only on the Saturdays of the quarter Senses, on holy
Saturday and the Saturday before passion Sunday and during the^
mass said by the bishop, although the strict law does not require
the last for minor but does for the sacred orders. A certain time
should elapse between the reception of one order and another, so as to
give the clergyman time to exercise the functions of his order al-
ready received, but often the wants of the church are such that
the bishop may dispense.
The clergy must be highly educated in order to " teach all na-
tions. " Therefore the bishop should examine them before
ordination. In the early ages when the bishops' houses were
seminaries for the education of the clergy, the bishop himself per-
sonally examined the candidates for holy orders. In these early
days the bishops' houses and the monasteries were the only schools
and colleges, and the bishops' students lived in the house with
him and he was often their teacher, and therefore he personally
knew them all. That was the origin of the present education
title of familiarity, where the student partakes of the bishop's
table for three years. But in modern times seminaries take
charge of the education of the diocesan students. Therefore
when the bishop sends a student to the seminary, he places him.
1 Concll. Trident. Ses. 21. Cap. 2. * Couucll of Trent Ses. 21. Cap. 2.
470 ORDINATIOX OF OTHERS NOT SUBJECTS.
jinder the charge of the professors. Although the council of Trent
says that the bishop should examine the students for ordination
in the presence of learned men, ' not only regarding their stud-
ies, but he should also inquire about their families, their char-
acter, age, faith and morals, yet synodal examiners do that now
for him. A bishop is not required to examine a student sent
him by another bishop for ordination, for the bishop to whom he
belongs should do this." But he may do so if he so desires, as the
sacred congregation defined. '
Without a formal trial but from secret information the bishop
may refuse to ordain any student, he is not obliged to give his
reasons. If the rejected student has a benefice, that is an office
which he will receive as soon as he receives the orders, then he
may appeal or have recourse for relief to the bishop's superior. If
lie has no benefice he may appeal to the Supreme Pontiff. The
reason for this is because often bad men, led by the desire of the
priesthood, get themselves ordained and they do great harm in the
church by the scandals they cause, when they have no divine call
to that holy office. But the church, in order to be just to all, gives
the student the right to appeal and apply to the Pope for relief, by
what is called a recourse to the Supreme Pontiff, and the secretary
of the congregation to whom the Pope delegates the matter writes
to the bishop for his reasons, when if the reasons are not good, the
student receives a letter empowering any bishop in the world to
ordain him.
The bishop is the judge of the wants of his diocese, and of the
number of priests required for the work of the ministry. There-
fore the council of iTent * forbids bishops to ordain clergymen,
unless he has a place for them, and the council also says that no
clergyman can leave his post without the permission of the bishop.
If a clergyman leaves his church without permission of the bishop,
going to another place or diocese, the council says he should be
suspended from the exercise of his orders, for churches and parishes
must not be left without priests to administer the sacrameuts and to
say mass for the people.
The bishop of the diocese in which the monastery or religious
order is, ordains the members when they have a letter from their
own supeiior. But as these things relate little to the laity, we will
pass them by for the more practical question relating to the sacra-
ment of confirmation.
The bishop is the ordinary minister of the sacrament of confir-
mation, 80 that without the delegation of the Pope, no priest can
■confirm. As it is a sacrament properly belonging to the bishop,
no bishop can confirm in another diocese, not even his own people,
without the consent of the bishop of that diocese. If he were to
do so he would be suspended from pontifical functions. ' When the
bisiiop comes to the parish to give confirmation, and to make his
» Sea. 28. Cap. 7. = Com-il trident. Ses. 23. C. 3.
» Nulllus 16 Jan. Ifi86. et 17 Jan. ltl!«. llenedlct xlv. De Synod. L. 12.C. 8. n. 7.
* Cap. 16 Ses. 28. * St. Ug. L. 6. n. 171.
PAPAL RESEEVATION. 471
episcopal visit, it is a great clay for the pastor and the people. Iq
catholic countries tlie whole population turn out to receive him,
the streets and houses then are decked in their brightest hues, and
it is one of the scenes seldom seen in our day especially in this
country.
No layman can be the judge of the teachings of the church, not
even relating to a question of fact, ' for the laity belong to the believ-
ing, while the clergy belong to the teaching part of the church.
The judges of the teachings and of the doctrines of the church
are the Supreme Pontiff for the whole world, the bishop for all
the members of his diocese, even for the regular religious orders.
Other officers of the church, whom the Pope delegates for that
purpose are judges of faith, " but they cannot proceed against bish-
ops, apostolic legates and officials of the Roman court, but they
are to inform the Holy See if the latter lose the faith. The
bishop and the Roman official, both acting together, or separately
may proceed against the one who preaches false doctrines. But
in the latter case, each must inform the other before pronouncing
sentence, which carries with it a severe spiritual punishment,
even to the depriving of his office in the case of a clergyman, for
the church will not allow one of her officers to teach false matters
of faith and practice.
The Pope reserves certain great and enormous sins to himself,
^nd the bishop cannot absolve from them. But the council of
Trent gives the bishops authority to absolve them in confession. '
But the crimes contained in Bull Caenae of the holy See cannot be
brought before the bishop.
As the Pope reserves certain great crimes to his own judgment,
so the bishop can reserve certain sins in his own diocese. That
the bishops generally do in a synod. The congregation tells bish-
ops to reserve only few cases of great crimes in their diocese. *
Sins which are only mental and entirely internal are not reserved.
The reason why such cases are reserves as given flows from the
nature of the church, which is Christ still living with all his power
in the world, and because he said to his apostles: " Whose sins you
shall forgive they are forgiven them and whose sins you shall retain
they are retained.^' When the confessor refuses to give absolution,
or when his powers of absolving are restricted by the Pope or by
the bishop of the diocese these sins are really retained.
No priest can validly give absolution to any one, lay person or
clergyman in confession, without approbation and jurisdiction, or
as they are called the faculties of the diocese given him by the
bishop. The religious orders belong to the Roman diocese, and
they can hear their own subjects, but they are also restricted by
the same laws of the diocese relating to the laity and clei-gy of
the diocese. ^ The priest must first get the faculties from the bish-
op of the diocese, or from the administrator if the bishop be ab-
sent, because confession is a judicial act, which requires jurisdiction
> 18 De Haer. Ut. Inq. in 6. &c. = 9 De Haer. Ad Abol. ^ ges. 24 C. 6.
* Jan. 9, 1601. 26 Nov. 1603. » Council Trid. Ses. 23 C. 15.
472 kun's confessors, vows, &g.
over subjects before it can become valid. The general faculties
once given do not cease at the death or resignation of the bishop.
At the moment of death any catholic priest can absolve any sin
no matter how grievous \ where no other priest can attend him
before death. The members of the religious orders without the
approbation of the bishops can hear the confessions of the mem-
bers of their own order, the novices, servants, &c., who belong
to and live in the monastery. If the bishop finds the priests of
the religious orders in his diocese worthy, he should give them
the regular faculties of the diocese, or he may grant only limited
faculties."
The faculties of hearing the confessions of nuns are not given to
all the priests of the diocese, but the bishop appoints a confessor
for each convent. They cannot elect their confessor unless it i&
the custom, or unless they have this concession from the founda-
tion of the house or convent. If they are exempt and reserved to
the Pope, the bishop appoints a confessor for them. Besides this,
once, twice or three times the bishop should appoint an extraordi-
nary confessor, for all the nuns of whatever order in his diocese,
and if he omits to do so the cardinal penetentiary will appoint one,
taken from those appointed by the bishops to hear the confessioni*
of nuns. While the extraordinary confessor is fulfilling his
duties, the regular confessor has no faculties in that convent, and
when the former has fulfilled his duties he can no more hear them.
The same confessor cannot hear their confessions for more than
three years, without a dispensation from the congregation. These
rules relate to cloistered nuns, who take solemn vows, and wise
and prudent priests, specially approved by the bishop, should hear
them.
A vow is a deliberate promise made to God of doing something
better, made to God so that not to fulfil the vow would be a sin. It
is like a particular law one makes for himself, binding him-
self under sin. In this a vow differs from a resolution, which does
not bind under sin. The matter we vow must be something better,
as to vow to say so many prayers, to give money to a religious
object, or to take a vow of not marrying, &c. As to Peter Christ
said: " Whatever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be bound
also in heaven. And whatever thou shalt loose upon earth it sliall be
loosened also in heaven," the Pope his succesor can nullify and
dispense in all vows made to God. A few dioceses in the East ac-
cepted, all clergymen in the higher orders from subdeaconship
up take a vow of chastity, for this is the discipline of the church,
and no one can minister at her altars unless they take such a vow.
It belongs to the Pope alone to dispense in the vows taken by clergy-
men. Other vows the Pope reserves to their own dispensing and
in them the bishops cannot act. In all other vows not so reserved
the bishop can dispense. The bishop cannot dispense in the vows
taken by the members of religious orders. The church can-
> CoDcil. tiid. S68. 14. C. 7. * Clement X Bull Seperna Cong. Epist. et BeglL
LEAVING THE DIOCESE. 473
tiot enter into contracts between men, for they are founded on
the natural law. There must exist a just cause for dispensa-
ting in vows, and when such a cause exists, the superior is bound
to grant the request. Five vows the Holy See has reserves; the vow
of perpetual chastity; of making a pilgrim to the tomb of Christ at
Jerusalem; of visiting the tombs of Sts. Peter and Paul at Rome;
of entering a religious order approved by the church, and of visit-
ing the church of St. James, called the Compostellana. Under
pain of excommunication, no one without a special delegation from
the Pope can or must attempt to dispense in them. The bishop
may change a vow at the request of the one taking it, if there be
a legitimate reason.
The bishop being the head and superintendent of the whole dio-
-cese, he sees that the clergy attend to their duties, and they can-
not leave their post without his permission. If they do so he may
suspend them. * That was also decreed in the council of Aries held
in the year .314.' Later the council of Nice decreed that bish-
ops, presbyters, or deacons must not leave the churches to which
they are assigned,^ while the council of Chalcedon says that the
clergy should not be ordained unless they are assigned or appointed
to some church, which they are to serve. Later in the church
rose the discipline of having benefices to support the clergy, and
they were not always obliged to reside at their church in order to
derive the revenues. Later began the custom of ordaining the
clergy to patrimonial or missionary titles, when they are support-
ed by their own properties, when they live on the revenues of their
missions. According to the latter title nearly all the clergy of
missionary countries are now oi'dained. Many abuses rose, which
wishing to take away the Trident council decreed that no one should
be ordained unless the churches required his services, thus renew-
ing the ancient decrees. At the present time the priests of this
country take an oath when ordained subdeacons, that they will
not leave the diocese for which they are ordained without the per-
mission of the Holy See, and later a decree was issued by which
they may with the permission of their bishop go to another dio-
cese within the province. From decisions given by the congre-
gation in Rome, which has authority over these things, it appears
that the bishop must see that the priests of the diocese have suf-
ficient means on which to live, and that they cannot leave the dio-
cese when they have no place, even without his consent or even if
they have not the means wherewith to live as becomes the clerical
order.
The council of Trent forbids bishops to allow strange priests
to say Mass and administer the sacraments in his diocese unless
they have letters from their own bishop. * That has always been
the custom in the church, and this council only renewed the an-
cient discipline. In reply to a question of the patriarch of Jeru-
1 Benedict xiv. De Synod. L. il. C. 2. n. 4. ^ Canon 3 et 21. ^ can. 15.
« Ses. 23 C. 16 de Ref.
474 THE SUPPORT OF THE CLERGY.
salem about priests coming there and asking to say Mass, Innocent
III. told him that if they had no letters from their own bishops,
that he must be certain of their canonical ordination by the testi-
mony of witnesses, but not to let unknown priests say Mass in
public. This wise law, first promulgated by the council of Chal-
cedon, ' at present relates, not only to the secular priests, but also to
the members of religious orders living in another diocese, although
they may celebrate Mass in their own churches. ' It is easier to
allow an unknown priest who has not letters from his bishop to
celebrate privately than before the public.
An indulgence is the remission of temporal punishment due
for sin after the sin has been forgiven. It is the application of
the sufferings of Christ and of the saints, so that Christ atoned
on the cross for us. The right of giving a plenary or full indul-
gence belongs alone to the Pope in virtue of the words of Christ:
" Whatever thou shalt loose upon earth it shall be loosed also in
heaven." The bishops have from the Roman Pontiff the privi-
lege of publishing partial indulgences greater or less according to
their position on the occasion.
The clergy are supported in this country by the offerings of
the people. The offerings for Masses, funerals, &c, , are regulated
by the bishop, and the priest cannot ask more for the low Masses
he may say than the usual offering. The pastor may regulate
the offerings for funerals and high Masses for the dead of his
parish. It is disputed whether any priest can rightly accept lesa
than the ordinary offering for low Masses except when he is
understood to do so for charity or for the sake of friendship.
The Lateran council under Innocent II. decreed that " Every
one of the faithful of either sex, after he has come to the use of
reason must faithfully confess all his sins to his own priest at
least once a year. " * That is the law at the present time. The
law was made obliging us all under pain of sin, so the people
might be forced to receive the sacraments, not deprive themselvea
of the graces of confession, and that sin might not remain like a
chronic sore eating the spiritual life of the soul. That confession
may be made to any priest having the proper jurisdiction ns well
as to the penitent's own priest, even without the consent of the
pastor, as the Roman congregations often decided, * for the church
wishes to leave her children free to choose their confessor, and the
bishop may forbid any pastor requiring his people to confess to
him alone. *
Innocent XI. enacted a statute forbidding bishops to receive
any offering for conferring holy orders. The council of Trent
allows only a small offering given to notaries for granting official
documents. A certain offering is given the chancery office for
the dispensations from marriage laws. But each diocese has its
own regulations in this matter. Besides it is allowed to ask ladies
' Can. 13. » Benedlct;xlv. Const. Quam Gravis. 2 Aiiff. 2 1757. » Canon 21.
* Benedict xiv. De Synod L. II. C. H. * ConK- Eplst. et Reg. 8 April, 1684.
assistant's clerical garments. 475
entering convents to give a certain amount to the community
which pays their board during their novitiate as a dovvery. This
constitution of Innocent XI. forbids anything to be exacted for
the sacraments of baptism, confirmation. Communion, confes-
sion and extreme unction. Tiiis does not relate to the offerings
freely given to the bishop or pastor, offerings which are custom-
ary in this country. The meaning of all this is that salvation
and the graces given us by Christ through the church are so
great and so valuable, that no price can be put on them, and
to exact money for such benefits would be to sell spiritual
things for temporal tilings, which would be the crime of simony
punishable by severe penalties. Yet as St. Paul says : " He wha
serves the altar lives by the altar, '' the ministers of religion and
the dispensers of holy things must receive their living from the
people and the churches they serve. The church has made wise
laws for their maintenance — so that not being obliged to work for a
living, they can devote their whole time in the ministry of Christ
and for the salvation of souls.
In many parishes are associations, congregations, sodalities, &c.,
formed under the guidance of the pastor for the exercise of pious,
charitable and other works. The formation aiid erection of such
societies belongs either to the bishops or to the generals of re-
ligious having special concessions from Eome for that purpose.
When the bishop judges that a pastor by reason of poor health,
or for other reasons, cannot attend to the duties of the parish, he
can oblige the pastor to receive one or more priests to attend to
the spiritual wants of the people, and carry out the services of the
church. This is stated in the council of Trent.' By the com-
mon law, the selection of the assistant belongs to the pastor and
not to the bishop, but the bishop alone can approve him and give
him the faculties of the diocese and of the parish. But when the
pastor refuses or neglects to appoint the assistant, the bishop him-
self can do so. From the revenues of the church the bishop can
assign the assistant his means of living. The assistant's salary
comes from the revenues of the church, while all incomes from funer-
als and offerings for the reception of the sacraments belong by
common law to the pastor.
The common law of the church does not say of what kind
should be the garments of the clergy. The church only prescribes
the vestments of their official duties, and the clerical dress may
vary from time to time and from one country to another, never-
theless, in every day dress the Pope is clothed in white, the color
of innocence; the cardinal's dress is red, the color of the Roman
emperor; the bishops have the purple and gold of the ancient
kings; while the priests and lower clergy have the black dress, the
color of death, for they are dead to the world. To the bishop be-
longs to determine the clerical habit of the clergy of his diocese,
and see that they wear garments becoming to their state, " for the
» Ses. 1. C. 42. 2 Council Trident. Ses. 16 Cap. 6.
476 THE PRECEDENCE OF BISHOPS.
councils say that he can make regulations relating to the clergy's
dress.
In his own diocese the bishop precedes all others, except the
Pope and his representatives, the cardinals or the archbishop of that
province. In provincial councils the bishops rank according to
their years of episcopal consecration, and not according to their
dioceses, for the bishops are all equal in holy orders. A bishop
who resigned or who belongs to another province can sit and vote
in a provincial council, when invited to take part by the other
bishops. But if an archbishop from another province is admitted to
the council, because of his higher rank, he precedes the simple bish-
ops. AVe have given here but a few of the most important episcopal
duties and obligations but there are many more all regulated by
the common law of the church..
'vf^THEN the apostles established dioceses in the oomitries
^^^u^ m which they preached, in ejich city they appointed
^c) bishops, consecrating them and giving them author-
ity to rule that part of the church of God, but they
also ordained a body of clergymen, priests and deacons to be
the bishop's helpmate, his crown in the government of the diocese.
They wei-e called the presbytery of the diocese from the Greek
word meaning priest.
Each diocese of the apostolic church had its body of priests, its
presbytery or senate of the diocese, or the bishop's advisory board
of priests. No council, pontifical decree or ancient writer who
mentions them, but speaks of them as beinj; ali-eady old m their
time, and therefore with nearly all the solid writers, we conclude
that the presbytery or the bishop's council was established by the
apostles.
St Ignatiusof Antioch, converted by St. Peter, or as some say the
little child blessed by our Lord, spenks in many places in his
fifteen Epistles of the presbytery of the diocese, the priests and
the deacons: "For your justly renowned presbytery, being
worthy of God, is fitted exactly to the bishop as are the strings
477
THE "D0MINU3 VOBISCUM." OR THE PUIEST SENDING THE HOLV SFiBlT INTO
THE HEARTS OF THE PEOPLE.
A VOICE FKOM THE APOSTOLIC AGE. 479
to the harp. Thus being joined togetlier in concord and har-
monius love, of which Jesus Christ is the Captain and the
Guardain, do ye man by man become but one choir." " Be ye
therefore ministers of God and tlie mouth of Christ."' Exiiorting
them to hokl fast in tiie faitli he continues: " Being un-
der the guidance of the Comforter, be in obedience to the bishop
and the presbytery, with an undivided mind breaking one and
the same breail, which i^the medicine of immortality, and the
antidote which prevents us from dying, but a cleansing remedy
driving away evil, that we should live in God through Jesus
Christ. "* " 1 exhort you to study to do all things with a divine
harmony, while your bishop presides in the place of God, and
your presbyters in the place of the assembly of the apostles, along
with you deacons, who are most dear to me and are entrusted with
the ministry of Jesus Christ. " * " Study therefore to be estab-
lished in the doctrines of the Loi'd and of the apostles, so that all
things whatsoever you do may prosper, both in the flesh and
spirit, in faith and love with your most admirable bishop, and the
well woven spiritual crown of your presbyterv, and the dea-
cons who are according to God." * " Be ye subject to the bishop
and one another as Christ to the Father, that there may be a
unity according to God among you." ^
To the Trallians he writes : " And be ye subject also to the pres-
bytery as to the apostles of Jesus Christ, who is our hope, in
whom if we live we shall be found in him. It behooves you also in
every way to please the deacons, who are ministers of the mys-
teries of Christ Jesus, And do ye reverence them as Christ
Jesus, whose place they are the keepers, even as the bishop is
the representative of the Father of all things, and the presbyters
are the sanhedrim of God, and the assembly of the apostles of
Christ. Apart from these there is no elect church, no congre-
gation of holy ones, no assembly of saints. " ' We close these
writings of the apostolic age by the following words of this
father and companion of the apostles made so famous by his
martyrdom: "And do you also reverence your bishop as Christ him-
self, according as the blessed apostles have enjoined you. lie
that is without the altar is pure, wherefore also he is obedient to
the bishop and the presbyters For what is the bishop but
one who bevond all others possesses all power and jtuthority, so
far asitis possible for a man to possess it, wlionccordingtohis ability
has been made an imitator of the Christ of God. And what is the
presbytery but a sacred assembly, the counsellors and assessors of
of the bishop? And what are the deacons but the imitators of
the angelic powers.'
The early apostolic writers tell us that the apostles founded the
presbytery of the dioceses, formed of priests and deacons in each
diocese, often to the number of twelve priests, images of the twelve
- * Ibid. Cap. X. - Epist. ad Mag. xx. ' Episr. ad Magnes. Cap. vl.
* Ibidem Cap. xlll. » Eplst. ad Magnes. Cap. xill. • Cap. iii.
' Ad Trallians Cap. vu.
480 FORMATION OF THE PRESBYTERY.
apostles and of seven deacons, copied after the deacons established
by the apostles in the church at Jerusalem. * -They were the coun-
sellors of the bisliop, the senate of the diocese, as the Son is the
Counsellor of the Father in heaven in all the works of the Divinity.
The apostles founded them jis the presbytery of the diocese, the
bishop's council, as an image of the twelve apostles established by
our Lord. While with them in each diocese were seven deacons,
copied after the deacons established by the apostles. * as the wants
of the early christians required, they also ordained lower ministers
to take care of the church, to read the Scriptures, to look after the
finances, the widows and orphans, to prepare the bread and wine for
the ssijCred mysteries of the mass, and to wait on the bishops and
priests of the first ages of the church. These twelve priests
and seven deacons were even in apostolic times called the bi.sliop's
council or the senate of the church. These alone excepted, there
were no other ju'iests \jV deacons in the days of the apostles. In
the famous archdiocese founded by St. Mark at Alexiindria, this
peiKiie of the diocese was celebi'ated for her learned churchmen.
From this senato the bishop of this see was always elected, at whose
(ionsecration thevclected and ordained a priest to fill the vacancy.
The decrees of Nice, probably genuine foibid any diocese to have
less than these twelve priests and seven deacons: " f^st the prayers
of the church might cease or her ministry suffer, l)ut not more
than these lest the expenses might become too great.'" On Sun-
davs and feast days, the bishop sent one or more of these clergymen
to places outside the city to attend t<> the sjiiriiind wants of the
people living there, and after fulfilling these duties they returned
to the cathedral, and reported to the bishop that thev had fulfilled
the functions for which he had appointed them, licoause of her
universal dominion over all the other cliurches of the apostolic
age, Rome had a dotible presbytery of twenty-four priests and
fourteen deacons, whose chaiiinan was the arehpriest, and the
superior of the desicons was the archdeacon, who to<»k care of the
pioperties, the finances, the widows and the orphans of the Roman
diocese.
T'he bishops, heirs of the apostles, were the pastors of the dio-
cese, and they administered the whole diocese by and through the
members of the presbyteries. When in the IV. century the coim-
try parishes began to be established in some places, priests and
deacons were appointed to these parishes outside the episcopal
cities, but they were considered as inferior to the cathedral clergy,
who as from the apostolic age stdl formed the seiuite of the dio-
cese. In all the chanires of discijjline, the twelve priests and the
seven deacons always formed the senate of the diocese, the council
of the bishop, the chosen members of the diocesan clergy. They
were ktiown by divers names in different ages, as the presbyters,
the senate, the bishop's crown, the Ijishoji's council, the cathedral
chapter, &c., but from the days when they were est jiblished by the
I Acts vli - Acts v2. * Canon 62 Nloente-Anblctu.
HOW THE APOSTLES FOUNDED DIOCRSES. 481
apostles, np to our time, they liavo rernuiiied siibstantiully the same,
for tliey beloiiof to tlie perfect orfrniiizatioii of the dioeet^e.
In each city where the apostles |)reach(^d. they built iij) a cliiirch
from tiie converts they made, then they appointed and conseciated
a bishop for them. This 8t. Panl did when he appointed his dis-
ciples Sts. Timothy and Titus. St. Peter did it at Antioch. St.
Thomas did thi same at Babylon in nominating his followers Sts.
Adaeusand Maris. There these beloved disciples wrotedown the Lit-
urgy, which he bad composed in the Babylonian tongue, which
remains to our day not a word changed.' When the church was
well established in tiie city, the apostle left them under the guid-
ance of the bishop he had given them, and went forth to convert
other people to the faith of Christ.
But the apostles did not leave them alone to the care of the bish-
op, for he too must have his helpmate for the work of the minis-
try. Befoi-e leaving the apostle appointed and ordained a dio-
cesan clergy, spiritual sons and images of the bishop, and they
preached and administered under the eye and care of the bishof).
They were to the number of twelve pi'iests and seven deacons in
every church founded by the apostle--. The bishop was the head
of the diocese, and they were one with him, hisadvisers and helpers
in his diocese, hence their name the chapter, from capitulum from
caput, the Latin for head, or from the capitulum read by them in
the Office. According to the rules of the early church, and the
customs found in the fathers before the council of Nice.* the sen-
ate of the clergy was found in every diocese of the early church.
Their names were often written in the catalogue, after that of the
bishop and his former predecessors, who had departed this life.
That list of names was often called the canon of that church, and
therefore they were called the canons of the cathedral. We see
thus the chief saints of the Roman church even to our day in the
canon of the Mass. The bishop was their father in Christ, because
he or his predecessor had ordained them and he looked after their
support.'
When an apostle had converted a city, each Sunday and feast
day he assembled the clergy and people for the services, and his
senate of priests and deacons altogether with him said the Mass,
altogether pronoum-ing the sacred words, the same as we still do
at the ordination of a priest. This took place in the catecombs,
in secret places, or in the fastness of the mountains, for they were
ever belied and misunderstood. The pagans heard of the Mass,
the "mystery" as it is still called in eastern Rites, and they sup-
posed the christians met to put a little child to death and eat his
flesh.
The diocese had then one church, the cathedral or mother church
of the whole diocese, while at Rome was the Mother church of
the world, the Chair of Peter. The other dioceses of the world
1 See Lit. of the Blessed Apostles. Early Lltunries Anti-Nlcene Librarj'.
^ Anti-Nicene Library. ' Concll. I'achiitli an. VSr. ;
482 THE SENATE ADVISES THE BISHOP.
were the daughters of this Mother church at Roine,as the par-
ishes established later were the daughters of the cathedral. The
bishop alone was the pastor of the whole diocese, while these twelve
])riests and seven deacons aided him in preaching the Gospel, in
administering the sacraments, and in ruling his christian people.
The bishops of the early church did nothing without first consult-
ing their senateof priests and deacons, a body which was sometimes
called the cathedral college. Later the country parishes were
formed each with a priest as rector, the number of priests and
lower clergy of the diocese increased, the wants of the churches
multiplied, but still the twelve canons were found at each cathe-
dral aiding and helpijig the bishop. The bishop and his senate
sat in the church; often the bishop's throne was behind the altar
in the apse of the cathedral, with the seats of the priests and
deacons around it. There they heard confessions as a spiritual
court, both bishops and priests pronouncing the words of absolu-
tion. AVithout them the bishop could not hear cases or give
judgment. " The deacons and presbyters shall assist at the
judgment" says the A[)ostolic Constitutions.' "The bishop
shall hear no case without the presence of his clergy, otherwise
the sentence of the bishop shall be null and void, unless it be
strengtiiened with the sentence of the clergymen," says the IV.
council of Carthage.* That was the discipline in England in the
days of the great Egbert of York, who says:' " The bishop shall
hear no case without the presence of his clergy, confession alone
excepted." The great St Chrystom complains of his cathedral
chapter at Constantinople in these words: "Those who with us
guide th.e ship have tried to sink the vessel."* '* The bishop
jnust not ordain the clergy without the advice of his clergy " says
the TV. council of Carthage. Such was the discipline of the
early church. The council of Trent wishing to renew that wise dis-
cipline says: *' Ordinations should take place in the cathedral.
Tlie canons of the cathedral being called and present at the
function."'
Numerous monumentsof the early church show us that the presby-
tery, or the priests of the cathedralformed thesenate of the diocese.
The first bishops did nothing without first consulting them. For
the first three centuries of the church, the presbytery of the dio-
cese was the senate, without the consent of which the bishop un-
dertook nothing. As St. Jerome says it was a body likened to the
great senate of the Roman empire under the Caesars. The arch-
priest was head of the twelve priests, and the arohdcaoon was the
chief of the deacons composing this. They did all the work
in the diocese now done by the country pastors up to the establish-
ment of rural parishes after the IV. century, and they carried out
the work of the city pastors till the XI. century, when the city
parishes were founded. The diocese is an inuige of the whole
• L. 2. C. 4T. » Canon 28. » Excerpt- can. 43. « 8er. post red. n. 5.
• Ses. 88. C. 8. DeRef.
THE SENATE AND BISHOP DISAOREE. 483
church, and tliey were in the diocese and lield a similar relation re-
garding their bishop, that the venerable college of cardinals are
regarding th3 universal church, and regarding their own Bishop
the Pope. For centuries they formed a brotherhood under the
presidency of the bishop, living in his palace, eating at his table,
and having all things in common like the christians of the apostol-
ic age.
In the XI. century began divisions between the bishops and the
chapters— the members of the chapters in some places wished no
longer to live a community life ; the bishops sometimes did not
consult them before taking important steps in the diocese ; they
often were Jiot called to take part in provincial councils ; occasion-
ally they did not receive the usual means of living ; they were even
away from their duties at the cathedral ; some chapters acted inde-
pendently of the bishop ; others refused to allow the bishop to make
episcopal visits among them ; in some cases they claimed that they
were independent of the bishop in the administration of the church
property, and at last they refused to attend the bishop on episco-
pal ceremonies, or give him the honor due his office. These diffi-
culties, flowing from human weakness, upset the holy relations be-
tween the bishop and his chapter, and numerous were the disputes
appealed to and settled by the Holy See, whose wise decisions reg-
ulated the relations of the chapter to the bishop. From such de-
crees of Rome grew up the common law of the church, that mon-
ument of wisdom coming from the Holy Ghost, the fountain from
whici) streams the rules regulating the whole body of Christ, his
holy church. The Popes reduced the chapter to its i-ight place as
the iiid and the council of the bishop, as the apostle had founded it
for that purpose.
The chapter then is to aid the bishop in his administration and
to supply his al)sence from the diocese. They are the senators of
the dioceso, as the cardinals are the senators of the universal
church. When founded by the apostles, they did not live a life in
common, at le;ist in every country, for community life was intro-
duced m the IV. century after the division of the diocese outside the
episcopal city into country parishes. Even in our time, very few
cathedral chapters live a community life, having all things in com-
mon like religious orders. During the middle ages, they met each
Sunday and iVast day to say Mass, to sing the divine Office of the
Breviary, but the latter is not essential to their duties. As Pope
Felix said in deposing the bad Peter Cnapheum from the see of
Antioch: '• This is your final deposition from me and from those
who with me rule the apostolic throne." The cardinals rule the uni-
versal church with the Pope, and the canons help the bishop to rule
the diocese, partaking with him in bis jurisdiction over the diocese
both in spiritual as well as in temporal things. St Jerome says :
" And we have our senate the board of presbyters ; " " The senate
of presbyters in the city ; "' " The councillors and aids of the bish-
) St. Bazil. Epist. 319.
484 RELATIONS OF THE CHAPTER TO THE BISHOP.
op in tlie place of the senate of the apostles." ' The senate of the
Roman diocese was the most perfect and honorable of all the sen-
ates of the ancient church.
The council of Elnense rejected certain matters to the judg-
ment of the bishop and of the chapter. Pope Calixtus II. forbade
archpriests or archdeacons to suspend clergymen without the
council of canons, and required first the consent of the archbishop
and of his council. Alexander III. wrote to the bishop of Jeru-
salem: " You and your brethren are one body, of which 30U are
the head and they the members, whence it is not becoming
that, leaving out the members, you follow different councils in
church matters, for without doubt it is not well to contradict the
institutions of the holy fathers. It has come to our ears that,
without the council of your brothers, you appoint abbots, superi-
ors of nuns, and other church officers, as well as suspend them. *'"
The council of Trent requires the bishops to call the chapter of
the diocese and have them vote on the matters he proposes to
undertake in the diocese. This council enacted wise laws guid-
ing the bishop in his administration of the diocese, pointing out
how the chapter helps him in his work. When the French revohi-
tion disturbed the church in France and Belgium, Pius VII.
asked the bishops of these countries, as well as the cathedral
chapters, to send in to him within ten days their resignations, that
he migiit erect these dioceses in another way, to better agree with
the changed condition of things after the French revolution. In
1851 Pius IX. when forming his concordate with Spain, used
these words: *' The cathedral chapters of the archbishops and of
the bishops form the senate and the council of the bishops."'
The letters of the Popes in every age, as well as the decisions of
the Roman councils, call these bodies the senates of the dioceses
the counsels of the bishops, stating that the mind of the church
is to erect such bodies in each and every diocese of the world, so
that the bishops may consult them in important matters relating
to the diocese. We" see therefore that the chapter or senate of
the diocese should be in every diocese, as the helpmate of the
bishop and as the legislature of the diocese.
They are called Hie cathednil cha[)ter because they assist th?
bishop", whope church is the cathedral wherein he erects his teach-
ing chair. When God created man he said: " It is not well for
man to be alone, let us make help like unto himself,"* so the
chapter is as it were a help unto the bishop, aiding him in his
episcopal labors.
'i'he cathedral chapter then is a corporate or a united body of
men, or a college of clergymen instituted by the church under
one prelate, with him living and forming one and the samenionil
body, to aid him in tlie administration of the diocese, and to take
his place when the see becomes vacant. As the cardinals the
' St. Isrnatlus the Martyr ad Tralllanes. ' Caput. Novlt. •■• Art. l.">.
* Gen. IL 18.
WHO COMPOSE THE CHAPTER. 485
senate of the Roman diocese in honor precede all otlier prelates
of the church, I'anking next to their chief the Pope, so the canons
of the catliedral precede all other clergymen in the diocese, ever
ranking next to their bishop. ' Neither the bishop nor his vicar-
general, nor any other dignitary of the diocese belonging to the
bishop's court belong to the chapter, unless they are admitted, or
it is the custom of the diocese.
But the chief head of tiie ciiapter is always the bishop, or the
prelate who administers the diocese. The senior priest of the
chapter in former times was called the archpriest. In the absence
of the bishop, lie presides over the members as their head and
chairman when they meet for business, and he is the pivsidiiig
officer when the chapter sits without the bishop, for the latter
has not a vote in all their meetings.
The council of Trent says: *' In all cathedral chui'ches let
there be presbyters, deacons aud subdeacons. having chaptei'al
rights and livings. Aud with the advice of tiie chapter, let the
bishop distribute honors and ordain candidates to holy orders
as seems well to him, so that each may exercise his order, but let
it be so that at least half will be priests, and the rest deacons ami
subdeacons. But where the custom ])rev{iils, it is praiseworthy
to have moi-e or even all of them in priest's orders."* But few
cathedrals in the English speaking world have the means and reve-
nues of supporting a cliaptei", and the priestsof the diocese, called the
bishop's council, take their place in the present state of the
church in this country.
The canons instituted by the apostles were genei-allv to the
numl)er of twelve in each diocese, an imnge of the apostolic college
founded by our Lord. At the present time, no absolute number
is given by the common law of tiie church, that being left to the
judgment of the Supreme Pontiff, to whom alone belongs the
erection of a cathedral cinipter. 'I'hen he states the luiinber of
clergymen which will compose the board, and he alone can increase
or diminish the number of canons of each cathedral. Sometimes
worthy clergymen are named as honorary canons. The council
of Trent gives the bishops power to diminish the number of canons
with the consent of the chapter, where the condition of the diocese
requires such a measure. ' But the original number cannot be
diminished without the consent of the chapter, because the Pope
states the number of clergymen who will form the chapter,
nor can any change be made during a vacancy of the see.
Formerly the chief priest was usually called the archpriest
and the head of the dencous of the chapter is the archdeacon, the
same as the superior of bishops is the arclibishop. There are two
kinds of archpriests, one who presides at the head of the presby-
ters of the chapter, the others live often in a country parish, and
formerly he was called the choi-ebif;hop. now he is the rural dean,
or as the Greeks- call him the protopapa. They were often the
' Concil. Cologne. 11. p. 3. C. 2. ■ Ses. 24. C. 4. ^ geg_ 2\. C. 15. de Ref.
486 THE ARCHPRIEST A3fD ARCHDEACON.
vicars of the bishop, having jurisdiction in certain parts of the dio-
cese in the early ciiurch. Having sometimes in the early church
ten parishes and pastors under them, they were called deans from
the Latin decern, ten. As the rural dean hud authority over the
ten parishes of his deanery, so the arch priest, the head of the
presbyters of the chapter, had authority overall the priests of the
cathedral city. He was the first in dignity, ranking next after the
bishop, whom he attended on all episcopal ceremonies, fulfilling
the duties of the assistant ])riest in our days. He was the vicar-
general of the bishop for spiritual matters, while the archdeacon
was the bishop's vicar for tern peral things and in the administration
of church property. But they differed from the vicars-gener-
al of our time, in this, that the latter may be removed by the bish-
op, while the former could not be so removed. The dignity of
the archpriest in the church by custom has been reduced to an
honorary office, when separated from the office of vicar-general.
He occupies the first place in the ceremonies of the church but
that is all.
The most ancient dignity among the clergy of the diocese was
that of the archdeacon, because from the time when at Jerusalem
the apostles ordained the seven deacons, each diocese had its band
of deacons, and one of these was their superior. That was the
origin of this office. In the first five centuries of the church, he
was called the hand and eye of the bishop, that is he was his
vicar-general, the judge in criminal cases, the guardian of the tem-
poral properties of the church, and the chief and the leader of the
inferior clergy. The IV. council of Carthage says that at the
reception of minor orders, he handed the instruments of their
office to the candidates during the ordination ceremonies. Al-
though he was only in deacon's orders, yet being the bishop's vicar-
general, he formed one moral person with the latter, and was
therefore in jurisdiction over the priests and other clergy of the
diocese, the same as the cardinal deacons of the Roman church to-
day, even when only in deacon's orders, yet precede all bishops,
archbishops, &c.. for they follow their chief, the Bishop of Rome
in his universal jurisdiction, " Really he is the first of the
ministers because he always preaches to the people, he leaves not
the Pontiff's side, an eviTfollows if he is ordained a presbyter,"
says St. Jerome when writing about the archdeacon.' Peter
Blesensis a deacon of London refused to be ordained a priest,
saying that he would lose his authority over the priests, for he
was the vicar-general of the bishop.' When the archdeacon died,
the six remaining deacons belonging to the chapter elected his
successor, but in some placesthey presented the candidate to the bish-
op for his approval, and after his ordination and installation in office,
the bishop could not remove him without a cause established by a
trial. During the VI., VII. and VIII. centuries the archdeacon
was everywhere the vicar-general of the bishop, and the judge of
> lo Ezflcb. C. 18. - Epist. 138.
ARCHPRIESTS AND ARCHDEACONS REGULATED. 487
criminal cases, exercising his authority over the lower clergy of
the diocese, and even over the country pastors. During the reign
of Charlemagne, they visited the different parishes and parts of
the diocese on episcopal visitations with the bishop sonietitnes in
place of the bishop's vicar-general. There was only one archdeacon
in each diocese, but in some cases we find two or more. Thns
Hincmar, archbishop of Rheims, France, had two sucli otHcials in
his diocese. Often they had also jurisdiction over the priests and
archpriests as vicars of the bishop, ' but this never obtained in the
Greek church. They could not be removed at the wish of the
bisliop, as the vicar-general of our time, as they had authority
from the common law with officials attending on them. Contests
arose between some of them and the bishop, as in the case of
Theobald, archdeacon of Paris, who, without notifying the bish-
op, closed and interdicted all services in the churches of his
deanery, and he would not let even the bishop enter them for
divine service.* From being the aid and the iielper of the bishop,
the archdeacon in some dioceses became a hindrance and a stumb-
ling block, till bishops got over the difficulty by appointing other
vicars-getteral removable at will. Then the councils forbade the
archdeacous to touch important cases, especially relating to mar-
riage. At Romeand at Constantinople tlieoffice was disestablished,
and by the lapse of titne. the duties of the archdeacon were reduced
to one only of dignity when on episcopal ceremonies, as we see it
at the present time. The church may change her own institutes
founded by himself, while these officers established by our Lord
and the apostles, as ttie Papacy, the episcopacy, the priesthood
and the lower ministers ever remain, for they are fundamental to
the very church's existence.
The council of Trent says that the archdeacons should be the
helpers and as the eyes of the bishop in every diocese. They should
be doctors in theology, licentiates in canon law, and they must not
act in important cases, as these thiugsare now reserved to the bish-
op, thus showing that the office itself was not taken away by this
council, but only that its powers were restricted. The archdeacons
still remain the judges of civil cases arising between the clergy.
They examine the clergy for promotion to holy orders and pre-
sent them for ordination. They are over the lower clergy, from
whom they receive the honors due their state and holy office. But
they are appointed by the bishop and may be removed by him for
cause."
Th^ council of Trent says: ''The same holy synod, following
the constitutions of the Supreme Pontiffs, and the councils,
embracing and increasing them, lest the heavenly treasury of the
Holy Bible, which the Holy Ghost with such liberality gave men
might be neglected, the council defines and decrees, that in each
church, where there is a foundation or a stipend, or a support, or
• Greg. L. 1. Decret. Tit. xxiii. C. I. 7. Innocent lli. &c 'In the year 1131.
» I Decret. C. De Haec.
488 IMPOllTANT OFFICERS.
called by any other name left for readers of holy tlieology, the
bishops, archbisliops, primates and ordinaries of these places,
where were left these foundations for the explanations and inter-
pretation of the holy Scriptures, they will explain them either by
themselves if capable or by another worthy man," &c.' The official
of the diocese for the explanation of the Holy Bible, thus pointed
out by the council, should be a member of the cathedral chapter,
and a doctor of theology, and he should be supported by the funds
above mentioned by the bishops and by the council, or by any other
way which tiie bishop judges best. He is called the theological
canon. The bishop appoints and removes him with the advice of
the senate or chapter of the diocese. In certain cases given in the
canon law the appointment belongs to the Pope, in Italy there is
an examination of the candidates, which follows the same rules as
the examination of the candidates for the permanent rectorships
of this country given in the III. council of Baltimore. The rules
to guide this official are given in canon law of the church, but they
would not interest the laity.
" In every cathedral church, where it can be done, let the bishop
appoint a penitentiary. . .who is a master, doctor, or licentiate in
divinity or in canon law, and of forty years of age, or any other
more apt considering the church, who while he hears confessions
maybe considered as present in the choir.'*' The penetentiary
thus nominated hears confessions, for which duty more learning
is required than for any other duty in the church. His faculties
extend to the whole diocese, and the common law gives him the fac-
ulties as soon as the bishop appoints him to the office. But he
cannot absolve cases reserved to the Pope nor to the bishop witiiout
special faculties. The discipline of the church has changed re-
garding these things. "When in later centuries the duties of the
bishop multiplied, he delegated this duty to the penetentiary as
given above. At the present time all the priests of the diocese
hear confessions, and the office of penetentiary is no more re-
stricted to one member of the chapter.
Each canon had his official duties assigned him by the bishop or
the chapter. Although these duties differed from time to time and
from one diocese to another, we will give- the offices of the chapters
attached to most of these 24 great cathedrals of England, before
the reformation swept the true church from the whole lealm. and
left these great monuments of the ages of faith silent witnesses of
that church, once so flourishing, but now fallen into heresy.
The governing court otiicers of the bishop, as head of the diocese,
were his vicar-general, the archpriest, the archdeacon, the chan-
cellor of the diocese and the bishop's secretary. The archpriest
and archdeacon were often members of the chapter, one being the
head of the priests the other the chief of the deacotis belongitjg to
the chapter. The bishop and his vicar did not properly belong to
the chapter, yet sometimes the bishop chose one of the members
« Ses. 6. C. I. de Ref. * CodcII. Trld. Sea. 24 d. 18. De Ref.
THE CHAPTER ESTABLISHED IN ENGLAND. 489
of the chapter as liis vicar. The officers proper of tlie senate were,
the dean of the priests, or as he was called thearchpriest, who })re-
sided as chairman at the sittings of the chapter. The presenter
trained tlie choir in all the beauties of the church music or plain
chant. The chancellor kept the records and minutes of the meet-
ings, and was the clerk of the senate. The treasurer took charge
of all moneys and properties belonging in common to the senate;
another was a doctor in Divinity and two were doctors in canon
law; the vicar choral looked after the services and was the master
of ceremonies; the archschola was the schoolmaster and head of the
seminary for the education of the young levites, candidates for
holy orders; another was the chief singer, and lead the chancel
choir; another was the master of the fabric and took care of the
buildings attached to and belonging to the cathedral, while still
another looked after the parish duties. But they had other minor
duties, as the preaching of the Gospel, various learned and scien-
tific studies, tlie hearing of confessions and other obligations of
their sacred ministry.
AV hen 8t. Augustine, tall of stature and imposing in appearance,
landed on thesliores of Kent,' leading his forty Benedictines sent
by Gregory the Great for the conversion of England, carrying with
tiiem their library of sacred books and their knowledge of Koman
customs, which they have practised in St. Andrew's monastery on
the Coeliaiiian hill, the ancient home of the senatorial family of
whicli Gregory was the heir, they formed themselves into a band or
college of monks. St. Augustine Apostle of England founded Can-
terbury Cathedral. Miletus then built St. Paul's, London and laid
the foundations of Westminster Abbey, around which cluster the
history of Enghmd's greatness. Under the shadow of those hallow-
ed walls was born the British parliament, that mother of legislative
assemblies in all the English speaking nations. Paulinus establish-
ed the church at Lincoln and became her first bisiiop. Hissucces-
sor. bishoiiRemi, organized the firstchapter of thishistoric church,
which later became the most famous senate of the early English
dioceses. Henry of Huntingdon in his " Epistle to Walter " gives
us description of each member, in hisown quaint English, of that
famous chapter of Lincoln cathedral. '• The founder Remigius L
never saw, but of the venerable clergy, to whom he first gave places
in his church, I have seen every one. R.ilph the first Dean — a ven-
erable priest. Reyner first Ticiisurer, full of religion* had prepared
a tomb against the day of his death, and oft sate by it singing of
psalms, juid jirayinglong whiles, to use himself to his eternal home.
Hugh. (Chancellor), wni-thv of all memory, the mainstay, and as it
were the foundation of thechiirch. Osliert, Archdeacon of Bedford,
afterward Chancellor, a niiin wholly sweet and lovable. William, a
youngcanon of greiitgenius. Albin, (my own tutor), Albin's brotii-
er, '• most honorable men," my dearest friends— men of f)rofoundest
science, brightest purity, utter innocence, and yet by God's inscrut-
* Acta Sanctorum 399.
490 THE FIRST CHAPTER AT MOXTKKAL.
able judgment smit with leprosy— but death hath made them clean.
Nicholas, Archdeacon of Cambridge, Huntingdon and Hertford, —
none more beautiful in person, in character beautiful no less, " Stel-
la Cleri,'^ so styled in his epitaph, a married canon, and Henry's
father, — Walter, prince of Orators, Geslebert, elegant in prose, in
verse, in dress. With so many other most honored names, I may
not tax your patience. ..." In his descriptions of the members of
this famous chapter, we find the " The Priest to the temple, the
Assetic, the Theologian, the Schoolmen, the great Preacher, the
Canonist, the winning manner of the Administrator, the polished
elegance of the Scholar, '^ all eminent leaders of that wonderful
English people, who even then were preparing the laity in future
ages to overrun and colonize a large part of the world, and introduce
their form of government but slightly modified into so many nations.
While reading this sweet description of Walter, the idea struck
the writer, that he too saw the first chapter which bishop Bourget
established in iiis ciithedral at Montreal, who went to Eome for that
purpose, and there lived two years, studying the cermonies of St.
Peter's, so he might introduce the pure Latin Rite into his church.
For nearly two years, each Sunday and holiday, the writer took
part with the canons at that new St. Peter's cathedral, Montreal, as
subdeacon or deacon waiting on the bishop on these great episcopal
ceremonies. And well he remembers the twelve canons and the
peculiarities of each; but alas he forgets their names, and they are
all now dead, but one alone remains, Rev. P. Lablanc, down whose
cheeks the tears ran two years ago in i-emembrance of the olden
times recalled to his mind, when the writer again vii^ited the ca-
thedral. Of the canons, one was full of grace in every movement,
peculiar because of his long beard; another most learned in the
sciencesof saintsj another washandsome, tall and slim, of a fair face;
all were dignified ajid courtly in manners. Like in the first chapter
at Lincoln, one was a married man, and the day he was received
into the chapter in the bishop's chapel, his little daughter nine
years of age knelt at the side of the writer, while the bishop coad-
jutor, now Archbishop Fabore, placed on his shoulders the insignia
of the canon. He had been a physician across the river, till his
wife died, when he became a priest, in that following the footsteps
of Card. Manning, and others, for the church condemns not mar-
riage, but sanctifies and hallows the legitimate union of man and
woman. Their saintly founder is dead, the canons were dispei-sed
and became pastors of other parishes, because they could not be
supported, as the diocese became involved in debt, and the sweet
singing of the holy office is heard no more in that church the same
as of yore, when the Roman ceremonial was carried out so beauti-
fully. But the time will come wiien the ciiapters will be established
in the cathedrals of this coui\try, and the senate will take its place
as becomes the perfectly formed diocese.
The twelve canons, with other clergymen took part on ceremonies
with the bishop. The archpriest stood at the bishop's side in cope.
THE DUTIES OF EACH CANON. 491
The archdeacon was the deacon of the Mass. The chief of the
subdeacons was below the deacon as the siibdeacon of the Mass.
The chief canons in deacon's orders were tlie deacons of honor,
while the other canons occupied the stalls along the chancel walls.
The ceremonies of the church show the true organization of the
diocese on holy week, and when the bishop solemnly pontificates,
surrounded by both the members of his court of jurisdiction, the
canons and cathedral clergy. There we see the officials of the
diocese in their true places, as the aids and helpers of tlie bishop.
For the church holds to her ceremonial given in the Missal and
the Pontifical of the Roman diocese, and each bishop and diocese
of the Latin Rite must follow it. As the diocese of Peter ever re-
mains the same unchanged, to be the model and the normal of all
the other dioceses of the world, the episcopal ceremonies show the
varied beauties of the diocese in all its splendors, such as was prac-
ticed from the days of the apostles, and kept unchanged, unspotted
by that long line of Bishops, who sat on the throne of Peter, against
which the " Gates of hell have not prevailed. " The canons and
cathedral clergy, who do not take part in the ceremonies during
the pontifical ceremonies they compose the chancel choir and sing
parts of the Mass. At stated times each day they gather in the
sanctuary and sing the divine office of the Roman Breviary. The
punctator culls their names and keeps an account of the absent.
The supernumei'aries fill the stalls or seats below the regular canons,
for they are candidates for any stalls which may become vacant.
But the bishop cannot add any honorary canons without the con-
sent of the chapter. '
In the early ages the bishop's house was the school or college for
the students, as there were no other schools at that time, and one
of the canons was the teacher of these students for the priesthood.
He was called the school master. Each week the bishop appointed
in his turn one of the canons to lead the people in congregational
singing, another to lead at the public prayers of the laity morning
and evenitig in the cathedral, another to attend the sick, to baptize
the children and look after the spiritual wtiuts of the whole city.
We find this latter official mentioned by the council held at Con-
stantinople in the year 536. Often a deacon, a siibdeacon and a por-
ter waited on this official, and they remained in the vestry of the
cathedral all night, where vvei'e guarded the holy oils, the vestments,
&c., so that they (iould attend the sick calls in the city without
delay. To-day thi.< official says the office in the choir in these
cathedrals where still are cathedral chapters, while on Sundays and
feasts, the whole cliu[)ter gather to sing or recite the office in the
cathedral chancel.
In the early ages, even during that epoch called the middle ages,
numerous gifts were left to the church and for the support of the
clergy. The bisho]) as head of the diocese was the administrator
of all these goods. The canons being the senate of the church, and
i S. CQDgreKatio 26 Feb. 1639.
492 now IHE CHAPTER WAS SUPPORTED.
one authority with hirn, tliey partootc of and lived on these offer inors,
Avliich were tlie revenues of the cathedrah Thev first lived in the
episcopal palace with the bishop, but jjiter they had a separate house
attached to the cathedral, which in England to this day is called
the chapter house. Yon will find that cliapter house still standing
attached to many of the great cathedrals of England, Avith the bish-
op's palace, the monastery where the canons lived, the school
wliere they taught the students, the stalls where they sat when sing-
ing the divine oftice. But the chapter house where they met and
legislated for the diocese, the cathedral excepted, was usually the
finest buiUling, often it was decorated like the cathedral. Fre-
quently the chii])ter house was a chapel or part of the cathedral itself.
To understantl the comj»lete architecture of one of these famous
cathedrals, one must nndeistand the constitution of the diocese,
which there is impressed on the sacred buildings of England, now
isad and Filent monuments of these ages of faith.
1'he way the canons must be snpported was given by divers
early councils. The council of Trent says that the bishops, as the
delegates of the Pope, must distribute these offerings and reven-
ues of the church to the members of the cathedial clergy. The
details of this distribution would weary the reader, but all was
carried out in the most regular manner according to statute. The
canons who had served for forty years could be retired with full
support. The sick and disabled were supported as well as the well
and strong.
The complete destruction of the church in England, the confis-
cation of church property in France, the upheavals during the ter-
rible French revolution, and the persecutions of the church in other
countries have interfered with tiie full establishment and workings
of the cathedral chapters. In this country the bishop's council,
formed of liis officials at the cathedral, the heads of religious orders
in his diocese, and the chief pastors of the diocese, are but the
shadow of the venerable senate of the diocese. We are waiting
till the clr.u'ch grows, so we can introduce the chapter in its full
vigor into the dioceses of the English speaking races.
The cathedral chajiter is the diocesan senate. They form a
deliberative boily, theactsof which are complete and valid only with
the (;onsent and ratification of the bishop. Two-thirds of the mem-
bers form a quorum and are required for business, and if less than
that number meet, the absent ones can meet and nullify the
proceedings. In voting the juajority rules, the same as in all
civil legislative bodies, which have only copied the customs of the
cathedral chapter all over the christian world. The bishop there-
fore, with the majoritv of the chapter, can override the minority of
the chapter, and pass any measure they see fit for the good of the
diocese, or even in matters relating to the chajUer or its members
taken as a body. But they cannot interfere in the private and
personal business or properties of the members, as they are founded
on the natural law. No measure or diocesjvn law passed by the
THE POWERS OF THE CHAPTER. 493
senate becomes valid without the approbation of the bishop, who
can veto any measure he does not approve, the same as the Pope
may veto any decision of the cardinals, as the governor or president
can veto any law enacted by the legislature or by congress.
The reader will therefore see tiiat the bishop holds a relation to
the chapter, like the Pope to the senate of cardinals, or the
governor of a state, or the president of the United States regarding
laws passed by the legislature of the state or congress. But the
bishop has more power in his diocese than the governor has in the
state. For the Pope has supreme jurisdiction over the whole
church and over each member, and he can annul all enactments
of any diocese if he sees it is right to do so, but the president can-
not do regarding any state. Nor must any one say that the diocese
or cathedral chapter was formed or copied from any form of civil
government, because the cathedral chapter or senate of the dio-
cese was formed by the apostles themselves, for we find that they
were in every church or diocese founded by the apostles. No
council organized them, no writer mentions them, but speaks of
them as being everywhere spread fi'om the apostolic age.
The civil legislatni-es were copied from them and they gave the
first im|)ulse to the parliamentary and legislative forms of gov-
ernments throughout the whole world. But although desirable yet
the chapter is not essential to the diocese.
The chapter must meet in the church, hall or senate chamber
appointed for that purpose, nor Ctin they without a just cause sit
in any other place. ' But this does not oblige under pain of the
proceedings being invalid. The bishop cannot call the chapter
to meet in his house, but only in the church or in the usual place,
unless the contrary custom prevails, which may be followed.
The sacred congregation decided regarding the senate of the
archdiocese of Tourin,* defining that when they sat to deliberate on
matters relating to the private affairs of the archbishop himself,
neither the latter nor his vicar general could be present. The
chapter may elect a bishop when the see is vacant in any room,
chapel or hall, even without any reason, except the election of the
Bishop of Rome by the senate of cardinals, which must be held in
the conclave, as given in a former chapter, otherwise it would be
invalid. ^
The senate usually is called by the chairman or president of the
chapter, and they may meet at any time or place wlien they are
accustomed to meet. The bishop can call them together when he
wishes by its chairman to a special session, or to elect a bishop, be-
cause the see has become vacant, when new members of the senate
are to be received, and when important measures are to be brought
before them. It is not required of the chairman to tell them be-
fore the meeting what matters are to be discussed, * because having
heard the matters regularly brought before the senate, they can
adjourn.
■'Laurenliis For. Eccl. T. xi. L. Hi. * Nov. 28, 1650.
8 Cbl Perlc. De Elect. (5, ^terni Patris. Greff. XV, &c. < Concil. 13 March, 1655.
494 THE CHAPTER THE BISHOP's CKOWX.
The matters coming before the senate relate to religions affairs
in the diocese, the celebration of Mass, the holding of divine ser-
vices, the correction of abuses, the punishment of those who tend
not to their duties in the church, the temporal business and prop-
erties of the church and of the diocese generally, to all things which
relate to the spiritual good of religion in the diocese. Such say
the councils belong to the cathedral chapter. But when they meet
for the election of the bishop, in many places they follow the rules
of the conclave for the election of the Bishop of Rome. The re-
spective dignities and powers of the bishop and of the senate are
80 arranged by the canons, that there cannot be any clashing be-
tween them. Nothing so adds to the peace and prosperity of
religion in a diocese as to bring all matters before the chapter for
discussion, before the bishop puts them into execution.
The Pope alone can erect and form a cathedral chapter. When
he has erected such a body, without the consent of the senate, the
bishop cannot admit new members of the chapter nor new digni-
taries, as this frequently was defined by the sacred congregation.
But if the chapter act unreasonably, the holy congregation will
take the matter in their hands.
The appointment of pastors and ministers to parishes, benefices
and church livings, belongs not to the power of holy orders, but
to jurisdiction. Therefore as delegates of the Holy See, the bish-
ops appoint pastors and other officers in the diocese. For that
reason the bishop should consult his senate or chapter established
by Rome before making such appointments. In certain cases the
Pope himself appoints certain officials of the diocese and of the
chapter. Even it is a grave question whether the bishop alone or
only the chapter appoints the rector of the cathedral. The read-
er will see at once the wonderful wisdom of tlie apostles appoint-
ing that presbytery or chapter in each diocese, which the bishop
must consult before undertaking important matters. The univer-
sal church represented by the Pope, and the diocese represented by
the presbytery, his sons, surround the bishop with the chapter his
crown, who enlighten him regarding his movements for the good of
religion, and thus the mitre is not left to stand alone, but is helped
by other aids in that high and godly office.
The duties of the senate are fully given in canon law, and
here we will only give a rapid glance of them. Above all the
members of the chapter must show honor and respect to the bish-
op, the head of the diocese, the Aaron of the New Testament. He
sits on his episcopal throne as the high priest of the diocese, the
first in the sanctuary, and he is the chief authority at all meetings,
where in virtue of his office he presides.' Over his throne should
be a canopy, a sign of his supremacy. When he celebrates solemn
Mass, or carries out other episcopal ceremonies, he must be assist-
ed by the chapter and other dignities of the diocese.' The Roman
' Concll. Trident. Se». 26 De Ref. '
* CoocU. Trid. 8es. 84. c. 1«. Oe Bef.
THE BISHOP MUST CONSULT HIS COUNCII^. 49.5
Ceremonial points out the duties of eacli official waiting on the
bishop.' The chapter must aid him on all ceremonies within the epis-
copal city and on episcopal visitations outside the city. But the ca-
thedral must not be left without clergymen, to attend to the spiritual
wants of the parish during such episcopal visitations of the diocese.
From the days of the apostles to the middle ages, the bishop
could undertake no impoi'tant work, without first layi?ig it before
tlie senate, who first passed tiie statute, and when it was signed by
the bishop it became a law for the diocese. Without the consent
or signature of the bisliop, the senate could pass no measure.
Their relations with the the bishop as given by the documents of
the early church was similar to the relations of the congress to the
president, or to the state legislatures regarding the govei'nor, or
rather that of the senate of the United iStates with regard to the
president. But the church found it necessary to restrict the pow-
ers of the chapter, till the council of Trent defined the mutual
duties and obligations of both the bishop and the chapter. This
was caused by the action of the chapters, which in some places put dif-
ficulties in the way of the bishop, and tried to lestrict liis authority
in his diocese. The mind of tlie church, directed by the Holy
Spirit who dwells within her, is to liave a cathedral chapter or
senate in every diocese, who will be the ornament and the aid of
the bishop, thus giving a perfection and a beauty to the episcopal
order, and to the cathedral, the capitol of the diocese, which can-
not be replaced in the church by any other means.
By the common law, the bishop must consult his chapter in the
administration of important mutters of the diocese.^ Alexander
III. in writing to the patriarch of Jerusalem says : " Let it be
known to tliee in thy care and prudence, how thou and they form
one body, of wliich thou art the head, and they are the members.
Whence it doth not become thee to put aside the members, and
use the councils of others in the business of thy church, because
without doubt it would be against your welfare, and contrary to
the institutions of the holy fathers. For it has come to our ears,
that you act without the councils of your brethren We com-
mand you, our brother, tliat in appointments and comfirmations,
and in other religious business of your church, you seek the advice
of your brethren, and that you act with their council or with the
advice of the lai-ger part of them, and in that way you shall act
and proceed so that you form statutes, which are to be passed, and
correct errors, and root up and destroy evil." Following then
such decrees of Popes the decrees of councils, and the entire body
of ecclesiastical lawyers, we conclude that the bishop must con-
sult his council in important matters of the diocese. But he is not
obliged to follow their advice, ami where the contrary custom is
tolerated by Rome, he can even act without first consulting them.
The common law specifies the cases when the bishop is bound tp
' CoDR. Rlt. March 23, 1592. ' Lib. iii. Decrat. Tit. 10.
496 FORBIDDEN TO ACT WITHOUT HIS CLERGY.
ask the advice of liis council, but we will not stop now to give the
cases laid down in the common law.
We have said that the bishop was not obliged to follow the ad-
vice of his council, but tiiere are certain things he cannot do with-
out the consent of the chapter. Thus against their advice, he can-
not put a heavy debt on tiie church property, soil the cathedral,
alienate any part of the real estate belonging to the church," and
other things which would notably change the condition of the
church or diocese, all these are given in the councils of the church.
The IV, council of Carthage defined: ' *' The bishop must hear
the case of no one without the presence of his clergy, otherwise
the sentence of the bishop will be invalid, without it is con-
firmed by the presence of the clergy, " and that wise law was in-
corporated into the common law of the universal church, '
Alexander III, decreed: '' As the priests are sons and brothers,
you must foster them with brotherly charity. We command that
you in no way presume to exact from them unaccustomed duties,
or unreasonably weigh them down, or treat them dishonestly, or
suspend them without the judgment of the chapter, or try to put
their churches under an edict, , , . , and be it known to you for
certain, that if such rumors again come to our ears, or that if
you commit such excesses again, Ave will punish you, in such a way,
that the fear of such a punishment will make you abstain from
such things in the future,'' From these two texts Leurenins
concludes that the bishop's condemnation of any clergyman or
the suspension of divine services in his church without the consent
of the chapter w^uld be invalid. This seems to be the opinion
of all writers on the subject, because the bishop must get the
consent of the council on all important matters relating to religion
in the diocese, and the suspension of a priest or the forbidding of
divine services in a church, is certainly a most inipoitant thing
for the whole diocese, especially in our days when such things
are often published far and wide in the news})apcrs. According
to the recent decisions of the Roman tribunals, the bishop can
examine into charges and punish the clergy of his diocese witliout
the consent of the chapter. But in tliis country, in Italy, &c,,
he must follow tlie rules of the papal decree " Cum Magnopere."
before depriving them of any parish, or before moving any per-
manent rector, as a punishment.
The bishop is the head, and the senate or chapter is the body
and chief members of the cathedral and of the diocesan clergy.
The members do not rule the head, and therefore the chapter
cannot make regulations for the bishop, nor for the dioceses with-
out the consent of the bishop. But they can lay down rules for
their own meetings, and for themselves, as they compose a cor-
porate board. But without the bishop's consent, they cannot
make laws for the diocese, or do anything to change the existing
> Cap. sine Excep. 12 Q. 3. * C. 88. ' As given in Ub. V. Decrat. Tit. 31.
THE LEGISLATURE OF THE DIOCESE. 4^7
state of things in any church in the diocese. Taken separately
from the Bishop of Rome, the senate of cardinals or the other
bishops have not jurisdiction in the universal church, and wiien
they meet in council to legislate for the whole church, they meet
at the call and under the chairmanship of the Pope, present in
person or by his legate. Neither has the chapter of tiie cathe-
dral any jurisdiction in the diocese taken separately from the
bishop, and therefore separted from him they cannot make laws
and statutes for the diocese, — their enactments must be signed by
him befoi-e they become laws, only his consent or signature then
giving them all their force and authority. But as a body corporate,
they may make their own regulations regarding meetings, the
time and mode of procedure, they can elect their chairman, &c. The
senates and legislative bodies of civil governments in every nation
regulate their own internal affairs, and allow no one but a mem-
ber to interfere with thetn, or even to enter the senate chamber or
speak while they are in session without their consent. UMie
chapter then without tiie bishop can make laws which do not re-
late to the diocese, the cathedral church, or to the personal rights
of the bishop. This is given in the common law. But the
bishop can veto any measure which exceeds the authority, which
the common law gives the senate of the diocese. They may pass
laws relating to the personal rights of the bishop, and affecting
the cathedral church and diocese, even without the bishop's con^
sent, but they will remain null and void until the bishop consents.
But by his tacit consent or silence, or if he says nothing, after a
certain time they may become statutes for the diocese. As the
administration of the cathedral belongs to both the bishop and the
chapter taken together, and as when once formed by the Pope,
their authority comes from the universal church given them by
the common law, the council of Trent therefore says tiiat the
bishop forming a cathedral clergy or cliapter acts as the delegate
of the Apostolic See, ' and he may assign to each a part of the
revenues for his living. Then the administration of the cathedral
church belongs to the bishop and the senate together, and one
without the other cannot make laws relating to its services, the
administratioTi, &c., of the diocese. The bishop can force them to
take measures which he sees necessary for the churcli. The
laws passed by the senate and approved, either by the bishop or
by the Holy See. bind each and every member of the chapter, the
clergy and laity of the diocese, and the chai3ter can punish those
who disobey tliese laws.
The common law directs the bisliop to hold a synod of the dio-
cesan clergv jit stilted times, and he can call the clergy together
without iisking the advice of the chapter, for in this he is di-
rected by the comtnon law of the universal cliurch. In enacting
the statutes of the diocese in the synod, he need not ask the con-
sent of the chapter, for he is the legislator of the diocese. But it
> Ses. 22. C. 3. De Rcf.
498 WHO CORRECTS THE BISHOP.
is dispnted whether these statutes would be valid without the ad-
vice of the chapter.
The chapter, forming a social board or a moral body with their
chairman, they can punish any member of their own body, any
cleric or clergyman who is delinquent in his duties. Where it is
the custom, tiiey can meet without the permission of the bishop,
according to the accustomed time and place, but when it is cus-
tomary for the bishop to call tl.em for a special session, tiiey
come only at his call to such special sessions, as the Kota defined".
But most authors say that they can meet at any time without the
consent of the bishop, and that seems to be the intention of
Rome. ' Bouix says* that by tlie common law, thev can meet
any time or place they wish without the consent of the bishop,
except where the contrary custom exists, or when for a grave
reason the bishop forbade such a meeting.
The canons of the cathed'-al alone form the senate, and the par-
ish pi'iests or other clergy of the diocese do not belong to it, for
by the common law only the canons compose the senate. The
permanent rectors and the bishop's council take the place of the
chapter at present in the English speaking countries. But it is
only for a time, till the regular senate can be formed. ' The
other clergy of the diocese then cannot meet without the consent
of the bishop, or form a body for the business of the church or
t)f the diocese, for the common law does not give them any such
license. But when the cause of religion requires, the priests of
the diocese can meet to take measures to aid religion or for
other good works.
The wife being one with the husband, as shown by the creation
of Eve from the bone aiul flesh of the first man, and in the for-
mation of the universal church from Christ, the clergy and the
bishop of the diocese, from whom they come by ordination, are
one body and the laity are their spiritual children. The wife is not
only the aid and the helpmate of her husband, but she advises him
and admonishes him of his faults. The cathedral chapter, being
the chief clergymen of the diocese, formed and ordained by him,
they are united to the bishop by a closer tie than the other
clergy. As St. Paul admonished St. Peter, * although subject to
the authority of the latter, so the chapter can advise and admon-
ish the bishop, that by this brotherly warning the bishop may
correct his faults. And speaking of this, Gregory the Great
Bays: " Peter was silent, because as he was the first among the apos-
tles, he would be first in humility."* Of it St. Augustine says:
" A rarer and a holier example Peter left to posterity, by which
we deign to be corrected by our inferiors," • "take pity not
only on yon, but also on your prelates, because the higher places
they occupy, the more danger they are in.*'* Therefore with
great prudence and from the sole motive of charity, superiors
" Rota 9 March, 1684. » De Cap. p. 418. » Conrll. Bait. III. N. 17.
♦ Galat. 11. II. » Horn. 1». Ezech. • Eplst. ad Hler. ' Epist. 109.
THE PRESBYTERY ON HOLY WEEK. 499
may be correcfcod by inferiors pointing out tlieir ftuilts, and tlie
history of the chureb tells us bow those who did so were hon-
ored, wben they did it with wortby reverence, as becoming to
the episcopiil dignity. This duty belongs to the chapter or the
bishop's council, and under pain of sin they are obliged to notify
the Holy See if the bishop falls from the faith, or if he does any-
thing which would redound to the detriment of religion. But
this hardly ever happens, but it shows the wisdom of the church in
leaving no church or diocese tobecome the prey of human weakness.
The council of Trent directs seminaries for the education of
the clergy to be built in every diocese, when it can be done, and
the chapter with the bishop has the care of the institution.
The bishop, aided by two members of the chapter forming an
administrative board, takes charge of the spiritual government
of the diocesan seminary. The bishop himself elects these
two canons, but he cannot remove them without just and legal
reasons. He must seek their advice in the spiritual administra-
tion of the seminary, but he is not bound to follow their advice.
According to the same council, two other canons and two
clergymen of the cathedral city aid the bishop in the temporal
administration of the seminary. The bishop chooses one canon
and the chapter the other, while the bishop selects one of the
city clergymen and the diocesan clergy nominate the other. The
members of this board are permanent, being only removed for
cause. The bishop must consult this committee in administering
the seminary, and without so doing his action would be null and
void, but he is not required to follow their advice in the temporal
administration of the seminary. The common law and the de-
cisions of the Roman congregations, give minute details regarding
these tilings, which would not interest the laity and therefore we
pass them by.
On church ceremonies, the canons wear the rochet as a sign
of their radical jurisdiction, the cappa and other insignia of
their office which becomes administrative when the see is vacant.
The stalls where they sit are generally carved in most beautiful fig-
ures as given in the engravings. Each day they come at stated times
to sing the divine office in the cathedral chancel, with its peculiar
quaint music, reminding us of the strain of choral singing estab-
lished by David and by Solomon in the ancient tabernacle and
temple of the Jews. On Holy Week, during these ceremonies
which the church has guarded with such care, at the blessing of
the holy oils, and during the singing of the Lamentations, the an-
cient presbytery of the apostolic age may be seen in all its beauti-
ful simplicity, where the twelve priests, seven deacons, and seven
subdeacons surround the bishop, as they did when the apostles
appointed the senate of the diocese in every church which they
established. The canons fulfil the chief functions after the bish-
op, and the clergy of the city and of the country parishes come to get
the hallowed oils, which they carry home to use in the adminis-
600 WHEN THE SEE BECOMES VACANT.
tration of the sacraments, and in other church functions of their
parishes during the year. We refer the reader to one of our
former books' for a history, description and tlie mystic meanings
of the ceremonies of holy weeic. Tiie chancel of tiie cathedral rep-
resents to our eyes in a material form that heavenly Jerusalem,
seen by the beloved apostle while exiled in Patmos. As there are
divers grades of angels and men ministering before the eternal
throne of God Almighty, thus the canons of the cathedral ap-
proach near their bisiiop, who to them represents Jesus, and for
that reason the church defines the various grades they will occupy,
while taking part in the ceremonies of the cathedral.
What we said thus far relate^ to the duties of the senate, while
the see is occupied by her own bishop. Now we will give their duties
when the episcopal throne becomes vacant, which takes place at
the bishop's death, when he moves to another see, resigns, be-
comes a heretic or is deposed. Then the administration belongs to
the senate, because the administration of the diocese belongs to
the bishop, and the chapter as the head and body, as they form one
only authority. But if the head be takeii away, the administra-
tion falls back on the chapter, as the members of that moral body,
which lost its head. Such are the provisions of the common law. '
That happens the moment the bishop dies, is changed, or has
been pronounced a heretic, for the diocese ceases not a moment to
have the jurisdiction given her by the common law. If Rome re-
moves him to another diocese, the senate receives jurisdiction the
moment they are officially notified of the removal. Witiiin eight
days from the time they obtain jurisdiction, they must appoint a
vicar capitular administrator of the diocese, while during this in-
terval, before such appointment, the administration rcsts witli the
whole chapter, as the administration of the whole church belongs
to the cardinals when the.Popedies. The Council of Trent states
that the chapter cannot hold the administration longer than these
eight dayp.
Before the said council, the archdeacon took charge of the tem-
porals or worldly matters, while the archpriest had the spiritual
administration of the diocese. This seems to have been the cus-
tom in nearly all dioceses in former epochs up to the time of the
apostles. But according to our more modern mode of discipline,
ti)e administration of tne vacant diocese belongs to the whole
chapter taken as a body, with administrative powers, and within
eight days they must appoint a vicar, till the new bishop is ap-
pointed by the Holy See. ' In some places they used to appoint
two or more vicars during a vacancy, who took turns in adminis-
tering, or administered together the diocese. Where this has been
the custom for many centuries, it may be continued, as Rome de-
cided a number of times. Rome would not let the chapter of Lima,
Peru, select two administrators, one to administer the archdiocese,
• THE FESTAL YEAR.
» Boniface vlll. Decret.C. Si. EpW. Prael. In 6. Condi. TrW. Ses. C. 7. IQ. Sec.
* CoQcll. Trld. Ses. 24 C. 16 De Bet.
APPOINTING AX ADMIXISTRATOK. 501
the other to hear cases of appeal ^roin the suffragan diocese, be-
cause such a custom did not exist for centuries, and the congrega-
tion directed them to appoint one administrator versed in canon
law — a decree which was contirmed by Urban VIII. ' The custom
of appointing more than one administrator must have existed in
the diocese for a long time, otherwise the appointment belongs to
the archbishop, as the couiicil of Trent says. Therefore we sum
up bj saying, that within eight days from the time that tlie see
becomes vacant, the chapter must elect one administrator, who is
a doctor in canon law, or otherwise a wortiiy clergyn)an, and if
any of these three things be absent, the appointment belongs to
the archbishop.
Tiie chapter cannot reserve to itself any administrative powers
over the diocese, as the administrator has complete authority
given him by the common law. They cannot appoint him as a
temporary administrator, but his authority lusts for the whole
time during which the see remains vacant, nor can they remove
him without a just cause, on whicii the Koman congregation shall
first pass sentence. When disputes arise among them about
whom they ought to nominate, Rome often appoints another
belonging to neither faction, who will have charge of the diocese
till the new bioliop is appointed. The admniistrator is generally
taken from among the canons, but if they choose a priest not a
canon, Rome will not reverse the election. They frequently elect the
vicar-general of the former bishop, a member of the chapter, a
Avell-known priest, or a pastor of a city parish, and they are free in
choosing whom they think the most worthy. But the mmd of
tiie church seems to direct them to select a clergyman who is a doc-
tor in canon law, so that he will act according to the wise laws of
the church in all his official duties. He should live in the city,
as most authors say, and therefore it is not customary to choose a
country pastor. As pastors have enough to do to take care of
their parishes, it is not customary to choose one of them, but
rather a member of the chapter, who will be free to give all his
time to the administration of the diocese during the vacancy.
In the infancy of the American church, the bishops of the
ecclesiastical province met in council, and sent the names of three
candidates for the vacant see to Rome, with their fitness giveii as
tlie worthy, tiie more worthy, and the most worthy, and the Holy
See selected the candidate from among them, or rejected the three
and appointed another.
The III. council of Baltimore under the direction of the Great
Leo XIII., lays down the following rules to be followed for the
present time till cathedral chapters can be formed in this country.
When the see becomes vacant, the bishop's couiicil, the image of the
cathedral chapter, and the permanent rectors of the diocese, meet
nnder the chairmanship of the archbishop, or of a bishop of the
province named by the archbishop, or if tiie arch iepiscopal see it-
' Exponi Nobis.
SO^ ELECTING A BISHOP.
eelf be vacant, under the bishop*of tlie province the senior in epis-
copal orders. Then the members of this quasi senate of the dio-
cese, taice an oath that they will not be moved to vote for any one
by favorsof any kind, they choose the candidates they think wortliy
for bisho})ric of the vacant diocese, and ihe archbishop sends tlie
minutes of the meeting to the Holy See, and to each of the bishops
of tlie province. The bishops of the province then meet ami vote
for the candidates. If they reject the men proposed by the])iiests
of the diocese, they must send their reasons to Rome against
them.' In Ii-eland, England, and Scotland, and some of tiie col-
onies, the priests of the diocese propose the names to Rome for
the vacant diocese. Where regular chapters have been established,
they meet ajid nominate the bishop, many chapters following the
"wise rules of the venerable senate of the universal church, the col-
lege of cardinals in the election of a Pope.
' Council Bait. III. T. xv. 15.
^ N the early church the priests were called simply the preshytery^
%h or later presbyters of the diocese. ^ In the VI. and VII.
(^ centuries they were known as the parish presbyters or parish
priests.' In the VI. century some of them were named arch-
priests.* The Greek word meaninjr parish often sicrnified the whole
diocese or territory subject to tlie bishop. From tlie apostolic asre
the limits of the bishop's authority were defined forojich bishop, "
and clersfymen were forbidden to pass from one diocese to an-
other, 8t. Jerom uses the word parish to sisfjiifv the diocese."
Some authors say that the word parish comes from Greek meaning
subject to the bishop, while others think itmenns a little citv or
country villasfe outside the cities, toAvhich in the first ages the bish-
ops sent certain pi-iests to take care of the spiritual wants of the
christians there living. The early writers and first councils of
the church quite often used the word parish.
' Council earth. Iv. C. 34. Council Tar. held .510. &c. = Conncil Tol. 111. held In 589.
' Council Valent. ill. C. 9. ■• Council Tiiron. held in 561. C. 7. 19.
* Concil. Ant. C. 9. et 21. « Ep'st. Ad. Pam.
503
604 THE BISHOP PASerOE OF THE DIOCESE.
As Christ founded the church universal in the peraons of the
apostles, to them giving the care of the flocks in subordination to
Peter, thebishops and their successors have in their diocese ordin-
ary power of feeding the sheep of Christ in their own name.
But as a pastor has the care of souls in a certain part of the dio-
cese, and not over all the diocese, it follows that he is not the
pastor of all the parishes in the diocese. ' The Pope has complete
power over the whole church as the Vicar of Christ, but he is not
tlie bishop of all the dioceses, but of that of Rome. In the same
way the bishop may be especially the pastor of the cathedral par-
ish, but he has not the parish titles of all the other parish churches
in his diocese. As the bishop is subject to the rules of the uni-
versal church, from which he comes into his diocese, so the pastor
is subject to the rules of the diocese, from which he came by or-
dination and appointment to the parish.
Up to the IV. century there were no divisions of the diocesea
or parishes, except in Rome, Alexandria and Antioch. Before
this time the bishops sent clergymen each Sunday to say mass and
preach to the people of the diocese, who could not come to the
cathedral. The bishop at that time was the pastor of the whole
diocese, and both clergy and jieople of the episcopal city came
each Sunday and feast day to the cathedral, to celebrate the divine
mysteries with him. The remains of this are seen to day in the
ceremonies of holy week, when the bishop blesses the holy oils with
the priests, deacons and subdeacons taking part with him. 'J'he an-
cient authorities, who prove this are too numerous to cite. Thereto
the cathedral church, they all came to receive the sacraments, to
hear the Gospel preached, and to receive the spiritual nourishments
of religion. The bishop at that time ordained the priests, deacons
and clergy he wanted for the work of the ministry. He appointed
them for the needed work, and he removed them at his will.
In the early church then there were no parishes, either in the
country or in the cities, — each diocese was a large parish, with one
cathedral, and often some filial churches in the city and suburbs.
There was a bishop there in every city, where a large congregation
was found, which generally would be attended from the cathedral.
But as tlie people of the country became converts to the faith,
the bishopcould notalone with his cathedral clergy attend to them,
and certain country parts of the diocese were marked out called
villas, regions or later paishes. This took place about the mid-
dle of the IV. century. * Still most of the people of the cities at-
tend the bishop's church — or cathedral, it often being the only
one in the city. This continued till the X. century, when the
cities were in their turn divided up into city parishes. The early
exceptions to this general rule were found in the great cities of
Rome and Alexundna, which under the influence of St. Peter
and his immediate successors was divided into regions, a priest
called a cardinal being placed over each, the image of the future
> Bouiz Tract. De Parocbo C. ii. n. 2. > Tbomaaslaus.
THE ORIGIX OF PAUTSHES. 505
parish. ' Some writers say the parishes come from the apostles,
others that they were iiistitnted by the Popes, by St. Aiiacletus or
Clement I, while others think they were only instituted about the
IV. century, and even then they were found only in country
places in Europe, where the bishops could not personally attend
to the wants of tlie people. Even at the time of the Council of
Trent, some of the episcopal cities had no parishes. " Only the
country parishes were formed before the X. century, while the
cathedral parish took in the whole city. As the dioceses grew
larger and more populous, the bishop at his c:ithedral alone could
not attend to the spiritual wants of the people of his cathedral
city, and he appointed priests to administer the sacraments in
other churches. As a general rule, the arch]n-iest took upon
himself to provide for these wants, not only in the episcopal
city, but also throughont the diocese. Hence he was the vicar-
general of the bishop in spiritual matters, not only for the epis-
copal city, but for the whole diocese, Avhile the iii'chdeacon at-
tended to the temporal affairs. Such was the origin of the
vicar-general, who to-day takes the place of the archdeacon, and
sometimes of the archpriest, in our modern mode of administra-
tion.
We read that our blessed Lord chose 73 disciples, and sent
them into all the cities of Judea to go befoi'e his face." Accord-
ing to some writers the first deacons appointed by the apostles*
were chosen from them; others even think they were the priests,
saying that thus Christ founded the church — the pa])acy in Peter,
the episcopacy in the apostles, and tlie priesthood in the 72 dis-
ciples. 13ut it is generally held that these disciples were only
chosen temporarily for the mission of preparing for the coming
of Christ, like St. John the Baptist and the prophets, and that
they received no lasting power, such as the apostles received. They
may be compared to lay missionaries, who go from place to place
in pagan countries, preaching the Gospel and preparing for the
establishment of real parishes and dioceses. They were the tyjies
of the ministers of the church, as the Council of Trent says the
church was founded on the bishops, the presbyters and the min-
isters. From this it follows that parish priests were not insti-
tuted by our Lord, but that they are a purely church institution,
Avhich came later than the diocese. Yet the false decretals of
Mercator say that Pope Anacletus claims the parish priests were
instituted by the apostles in the persons of the 72 disciples, whom
they elected and ordained to the priesthood after the ascension of
our blessed Lord. According to the best authorities, each apostle
and bishop of the early church had with him a body of priests
and ministers, who formed a senate of the diocese. They aided
him in the government of the dioceses and in the administration
of the sacraments. But they had no charge of souls separate or
independent of the bishop. Pope Anacletus the second from St.
> Bouix De Parocho p. 85. ' De Ref. Chap. 13. ^ Luke x. * Acts.
506 WHO INSTITUTED PARISH PRIESTS ?
Peter in the Roman See. as reported in these Decretals, says:
'* The order of tlie priesthood is double, thns the Lord instituted
it, it should be disturbed by no one. The bishops hold the place
of the apostles of the Lord, the presbyteis hold the place of the
"72 disciples."' Ven Bede holds that the priests were typified by the
72 disciples. Numerous Popes, councils and famous writers of the
early ages liold the same doctrine, which probably shows that the
Lord laid the foundation of the three distinct organizations into
which the church is to-day divided, the papacy, the diocese
and the parish. The professors of the Sorbonne at Paris, a un-
iversity founded by Charlemagne in 790, held that the Lord insti-
tuted the parish priests in the persons of the '72 disciples, but the
doctrines of the Sorbonne were not always tiic most orthodox.
In that famous school, it is true, during the middle ages there
gathered sometimes .30,000 students. In it the great S*.s. Thomas,
Bonaventure, Peter Lombard, &c., taught. But in latter times,
it became the fountain head of many errors, which in the last
century developed into Galicanism, which endeavored to dimin-
ish the authority of the Poman Pontiff. The Vatican council
put an end to its errors. Frequently the Popes had condemned
the false tenets of that school, which ever tended to lower tlie
authority of the Pope, and to elevate in its stead the royal power,
and under this the bishops, the parish priests and the national
churches. Clement XI. condemned John Major, a professor of
the Sorbonne, who taught that Christ instituted parish priests.
From the earliest ages of the church, priests an(l deacons helped
the bishop in the administration of the church. They formed
the ancient presbytery or the senate of the diocese, which latter
became the cathedral chapter, as given in the preceding chapter.
But these were not parish priests. They did not fulfil the
office of a parish priest. They did what the bishop com-
manded them, and their authority ended when they finishe<l
that particular work. Their authority did not extend to any
particular part of the diocese as a parisli, but to the whole diocese.
They were the assistants, or the vicars of the bishop, and without
a special mandate of the bishop, they could not fulfil the duties
of the pastors. This St Ignatius thet-econd from St. Peter in the
see of Antioch tell us.' Many ancient councils and decrees of the
Popes prove to us the same. We must then conclude, that all
history tells us that the parish priests were not instituted by our
Lord, or by the apostles, but that parishes are the creations of the
church, while the orders of ministers, priests, bishops and the
Papacy were instituted by Christ.
In the IV. century rose the errors of Aerius, who claimed
that presbyters, or priests, are equal to bishops. That error was
revived at the reformation and condemned by the council of Trent,
but it is held by many of the separated churches in our day.
Towards the beginning of the IV. century, the population of
> Evaog. LucsC. la ' Epist. act Smyr. □. 8.
THE RISE OF GALICAN ERRORS. 607
the diooese grew so large, that even with tlie help of their pres-
byters or priests, the bishops could not attend to the spiritual
wants of tlie people. For that reason they gave the care of the
little cities of the diocese to the priests of the diocese. That was
the origin of the country parishes. But when they gave them such
care of souls, they did not take away their own power of sending
other priests to preach to them, or to admiuster to them the sacra-
ments, for the ])arish priests are subject to the bishop, as the latter
is subject to Rome. For the parish is not a perfect church found-
ed by Christ, as he founded the dioceses in the persons of the
apostles. ' The contrary was tlie error of the university of Paris
coiulemned by Alexander IV. " Such errors on the part of the
university of the Sorbonne gave rise later to the errors of the Jan-
senists, who extol the power of the parish priests, and of national
churches, to the detriment of the bishops and of the Apostolic See.
Their fathers were John Duvei'gier, abbot of St. Cyran and Jan-
senius, bishop of Ypres. The errors of the Jansenists in this
matter may be resumed in sayiug that: the Pope can do nothing in
any diocese without the permission of the bishop; the bishop can-
not act in the parish without the license of the pastor, a doct!-ine
which the Holy See often condemned. The professors of the Sor-
bonne took up the controversy, and held that a pastor could appeal
to the civil power, when his ecclesiastical supei'ior interfered in his
rights. These vicious principles at the reformation in England, had
resulted in founding the national church of England independent
of the Holy See. Some doctors of the university of Louvain
inclined to the same error in the XVIII. century. According
to these subvei-sive doctrines, the bishop would only have an in-
direct power in the parish, the Pope only an indirect and imperfect
authority in any diocese, the government of the church would at
last belong to parish priests, and not to the bishops, and to the
Koman Pontiffs, and there would be no need of either bishop or of a
Pope. It would overturn the whole organization of the church.
The parish priests then having no external jurisdiction in the
church, they are not the judges of faith and morals, and they have
no decisive voice in councils. If they sit in the councils of the
church, it is as advisers, as theologians, or as chaplains of the bish-
ops. They preach the teachings of Clirist as they receive them
from the bishops, and the Roman Pontiffs, explaining the teachings
of Christ found in the Gospels, the Bible, and in the traditions of
the church. They cannot publicly excommunicate even their own
parishioners. In a parish, a person may excommunicate himself
by sins forbidden under that penalty, and it belongs to the pastor
to bring him back again to the church by absolution with the neces-
sary power, when he is penitent and resolved to sin no more, while
it belongs alone to the Pope and the bishop to publicly excommu-
nicate for public and notoi-ious sins. The Pontiff and the bishop
alone can receive again that person into the church, for they are
» St. Thomas Opus. xvi. = In 1255.
508 INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL JURISDICTION.
the legislators of the church. They can reserve to themselves the
absolution from these censures. For to the apostles Christ said:
''Whatever you shall bind upon earth it shall be bound also in
heaven," &c. The power of excommunicating belongs to the legisla-
tive or public governing authority of the church, and not to the
pastors, but to the bishops and the Pope, for they form the hierarchy
of jurisdiction and government of the church. Tliereforea simple
parish priest has not the power of excommunicating, unless it were
given him by the bisho]) or by the common law of the church.
But a priest, having the administration of a diocese, with a special
mandate from the bishop or from the Holy See, can excommunicate
by virtue of this external jurisdiction. But the pastor can declare
that such a one is excommunicated, when he does anything to
which such a punishment is attached by the common law of the
church.
The word pastor, parish, &c., come from the Latin meaning to
feed. In Hebrew it is rahah, and in the Bible it not only means to
feed but also to rule or govern. * Princes who rule are called in
the Bible pastors; even the Lord calls Cyrus pastor. ' Homer calls
Agamemnon the pastor of men, because he ruled them. From this
it appears, that when Christ told Peter to feed his sheep and lambs
he meant to rule them. Whence the Bishop of Rome, Peter's suc-
cessors, are the spiritual rulers of the church univei'sal. The bish-
ops then carry tlieir pastoral staff, the sign of their episcopal juria-
diction over the sheepfold of Christ residing within their dioceses.
'I'liis is the sense of the council of Trent, when speaking of the
bishops, ' " ruling the church of God."* Such has ever been the
teachings of the church as found in the writings of the early
fathers. Only in modern times do we find parish priests called
pastors.
Tlie parish priest is not a prelate. For a prolate is a clergyman
having external jurisdiction over spiritual subjects, or a high
ecclesiastical dignity, while parish priests have only jurisdiction
proper in the secret tribunal of penance. The Pope, the cardinals
and bishops are the major, and the superiors of religious orders
are the minor prelates of the church, as the latter have authority
and jurisdiction over their spiritual subjects. The cardinals, even
of the Roman courts in deacon's or priest's orders have jurisdiction
over bishops, for being attached to the Roman diocese, they form
one and the same court or government with the Bishop of Rome,
who is over all the churches of the world.
The council of Trent ordered that a priest be appointed in di-
verse parts of the diocese from whom the people could receive the
sacraments. ' Hence we conclude that to be a parish priest, he
should have power to hear the confessions of the people, that he
is obliged to administer to them the other spcraments when they
ask, that he does so in his own name, that he does so in his own
> CnrnellimA. Ijip. Tn St. John C. 21 t. 15. > Isatas xUv. 29.
» Concll. Trid. Ses. 23. C. 4 « AcU. • 3es. 24 C. 18 De Ref.
THE DUTIES OF A PARISH PRIEST. 509
church and to his own people. ' The office then of the parish
priest is for the spiritual good of his people, wrought by the contin-
ual preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacra-
ments of Christ. To the parish priest then belongs the care of
souls living within a certain limit, who come to his church, and
they may be obliged to support it. He continually exercises to-
wards them the triple office of teacher, priest and ruler, the same
as the bishop is the teacher, priest and ruler of the diocese, as the
Pope is the teacher, priest and ruler of the church universal, — all
in the name and by the power of the eternal Prophet, Priest and
King, Jesus Christ. There is then for the parish priest an obliga-
tion of teaching, sanctifying and ruling his people. Nor can he
refuse when they reasonably ask from him these holy things. On
the part of the people, they must as far as necessary provide for
his support. Thus between the rector and the people there is a
holy contract, by which he gives them spiritual things, and they
give him temporal things, his living.
Now we begin to see the beauties of our holy mother the church.
From the bosom of the Holy Trinity came Christ to earth, and
all redeeming powers he receives from the Father, he gives to the
church. He left Peter as his chief pastor. The bishop comes
down from the universal church into his diocese. All he receives
from her he brings to the diocese. The parish priest comes down
from the diocese, and all he receives he gives to the parish, and he
comes bringing to his people the teachings of Christ and his sacra-
ments, which sanctifies their souls. A parish priest then is a rec-
tor, who has been regularly appointed to administer the parish ia
his own name, to preach the word of God, and administer the
sacraments to certain persons of the diocese, and these people
should receive these spiritual things from him. Each parish then
should have a parish church, where the pastor or rector may preach
and administer the sacraments to the people of that section of the
diocese.
A parish priest then has the care of souls redeemed by Christ.
But there are many different cares of souls. The Pope has the
care of all the souls of men in the world, for he is the Vicar of
Christ who died for all mankind. The bishop has the care of the
souls of those living in his diocese. The vicar-general partakes in
the same power with the bishop, for he is one and the same moral
person with the bishop, as the Pope is one and the same moral
person with Christ. The Pope has the care of souls, in such a
way that in him resides the full power of the church, both in the
internal and in external courts. The bishop has the care of souls
in his diocese, both in conscience and in the ecclesiastical courts,
while the parish priest has complete authority only in the confes-
sional, the internal or secret court of conscience. Only by persua-
sion, by advice, or by the denial of absolution, can he induce his
people to be good and avoid sin.
' Cong. Rotae Romanae.
510 THE REMOVAL OF PAllISH PRIESTS.
No parish should have more than one rector, for no woman can
have more than one spouse, ' nor can a body have more than one
head, else it will be a monstrosity. AYhen more th^n one priest
presides in a church, one is the parish priest and the others are the
assistants of the pastor. When one clergyman attends more than
•one church, all together they form one parish, for a man cannot
have more than one bride." Yet a parish may have two or more
pastors ' but in practice it gives rise to many difficulties.
In missionary countries, where catholics are few and scattered,
the bishop appoints priests to missions and removes them at will,
until the diocese and the parishes are fully established, then new
regulations are made, according to which all things are to be ruled
hy the common law. When the church spreads and the bishop
becomes the real titular bishop of the diocese, and not the vicar
apostolic of the Pope, then the common law may be established,
by which the bishop becomes the real spouse of the diocese, and the
parish priests may be made immovable by the canons of the church.
In this case the parishes are not only under the bishop, but also
under the common law, and from it the pastors derive their rights.
Thus the parish in its full organization depends not only on the
bishop, but also on the Papacy, the Father of all churches. The
III. council of Baltimore, according to the desire of the Holy See
made one in ten of the rectors of this country immovable, as com-
manded. Whensuch a priest is accused of any crime, Jie cannot be re-
moved before being tried by the canons given by Leo XIII. in the
3Iagnopere,or form of trial for this country.
According to the Magnopere, when a priest is accused, the pros-
ecuting attorney of the diocese examines the witness under
oath, sifts the charges, reports to the bishop if there be any foun-
dation for them. If he find that the accusers are lying, he drops
the matter, otherwise he draws up the charges in the form of an
indictment, and cites the accused for trial. The latter then ap-
points his advocate. If he admits that the witnesses were rightly
sworn and examined at the preliminary examination, their evidence
is accepted. If he reject them, they must be examined over again
in court, and cross examined by the advocate of the accused. Tlie
trial proper begins by the examination of the witnesses for the
{)rosecution, all proceedings being according to regular form of
aw. When the prosecution lias rested, theaccused brings liis wit-
nesses on the stand to refute the other testimony against him.
The prosecution may bring in rebuttal evidence, followed by re-
butting evidence on the part of the accused. Either side may ap-
peal to the archbishop within ten days after the decision has been
given by the priest appointed by the bishop as judge. The appeals
in every case shall take place according to the form prescribed by
Benedict XIV.* The metropolitan court then sits as a court of
appeal, and passes only on the evidence brought before the bishop's
> Rota Decls. 684 n. S. p. ■ * Alexander HI. et 4. QueteS. c. 21.
* S Cong. ConcU. 18 Junil 1757. * Ad MUltantis.
THE FORMATION OF PARISHES. 611
<;ourt. Many rules must be followed under penalty of rendering
the whole proceeding invalid from the beginning. Bishops are tried
by the Congregation at Rome, for the Holy See is their superior.
All this is to guard each clergyman in his rights, and to punish
those who are guilty of crime.
In former times, when monasteries and chapters had livings or
parishes, with the right of appointing the pastors to them, they
reserved a part of the revenues to themselves, till that abuse was
condemned by the Popes and the councils. In Ireland the bishops
often reserve certain parishes, and appoint an assistant to administer
them, giving them parts of the revenues and reserving the rest to
themselves. In France, in partial payment for the church pro-
perty confiscated during the revolution, the government gives the
pastors and bishops a certain income, called a salary. But the
amount is so small, that tliey can scarcely live. In this country the
pastors' and assistants' salaries are regulated in the diocesan synod,
each parish gives the bishop a fixed sum each year called the cathe-
draticum. If the bishop is the pastor of the cathedral parish, from
that he also may receive a pastor's maintenance.
As the pastor rules and governs the parish in the name of
Christ, to the people he takes the place of our Lord, an image
of the everlasting Head of the universal church, so the pastor
should not be moved from the parish without a reason. There
must be a sufficient cause for breaking the bonds of unity and of
fatherhood between the parish and the pastor. That the Eoman
Congregation often decided. For such changes in a parish give
rise to numerous difficulties, disputes and misunderstandings, and
work to the detriment of souls.
The pastor has jurisdiction to administer the sacraments to his
people, and he retains that authority as long as his office of pastor.
For CO the office of pastor belongs the duties of administering the
sacraments, preaching the Gospel and ruling his people. If he
becomes incapable for any reason, he can do so by the aid of an
assistant.
When a pastor is sent to a people who never before belonged to
any priest the parish is said to have been created.
After the French revolution Pope Pious VII. suppressed all the
parishes of France, and after the concordate of 180!^, pastors were
appointed to all the parishes of the kingdom. It seldom happens
that the people living in a section of a diocese do not belong to
any pastor, so that the creation of a parish except in missionary coun-
tries seldom takes place. It belongs to the bishop to assign and
appoint a pastor over a part of the diocese, and form them into a
parish. The bishops and the priests go first among the infidels
as missionaries, preaching to them the Gospel of Christ. When
they have converted them, from being wandering missionaries,
they become settled bishops and pastors, fixing their seats at a
certain place, usually where the most families and members of the
-church reside, so that the people may be better attended.
5l5f DIVIDING AND UNITING PARISHES.
As Vicar of Christ the Redeemer of souls, the Pope can suppress^
erect, or divide dioceses, or parishes. No one ever questioned hi»
authority, for he is the supreme Pastor of the world. We read
that in 1170 Alexander III directed the bishop of York to build
a church in his diocese, and appoint a pastor, in spite of the appeal
of the rector. The council of Trent commands the bishops, as
delegates of the Holy See, to appoint assistants to a pastor, where
he cannot attend to his duties himself. If the parish be so exten-
sive that the people cannot come to the parish church, the bishop
may divide the parish, appoint anew pastor to the part so divided,
assign him his sustenance from the mother church, and see
that the people of the new parish give their newly appointed rec-
tor the means of living.' According to the III. council of Balti-
more the bishop must consult his council before he divides a
parish, * hear the objections of the pastor, see that there be suf-
ficient cause, that the wants of the people require it, that the parish
they are going to divide is too large, and that the people live too
far from the church, &c. For the bishops in this matter as in
others must follow the laws laid down by the Holy See.' If the
pastor appeals against the division, it will not suspend the act of
the bishop, which may be reviewed by the archbishop, and if he
appeals to the Pope, the Propaganda, as a last court, may review
the case.*
The bishop may unite two parishes into one, when the two-
parishes cannot support two pastors. Then the two become one
parish, with only one rector, with the title of only one church.
Or the parishes may be united into one parish, still retaining
their old title, the pastor of one administering the other like a
mission attached to the parish where the rector lives. In this
way several dioceses of Ireland, once flourishing, have been at-
tached to others or united under one bishop. But says the coun-
cil of Trent, this should not be done to the detriment of the pas-
tor, and it may better take place at his death, resignation, or with
his consent, so that his rights may not be trampled on.
In former times as now, in some countries many rich people
build churches or found benefices for tlie support of the clergy,
and they are given the privilege of presenting candidates for
such churches. The bishops appointed the persons they named,
provided they had duly qualified according to the canons of the
church, which regulated these nominations, so that unworthy
clergymen might not be appointed to these benefices.
The Pope as the head of the universal church, appoints the
bishops, wherever they are nominated by the government, by the
pastors of the diocese, by the bishops of the province, by the
chapter of the cathedral, or by any other mode of nominating
bishops. The true appointing power resides in the Pontiff, the
Pastors of bishops. So in the diocese, to the bishop ordinarily
» CoDcll. Trld. Ses. 21. C. 4. » N. 20 ot 84. 89. et pp. 219, 231.
» 8. Cong. Oonctl. 18W T. 10 9 May. * Innocent III. Cap. Pastoralls, S2 T. 28.
WHO APPOINTS THE PASTORS? 513
belongs the appointment of pastors of tlie parishes. For as the
Son was sent by the Father to the world, so the pastors of the
■church are sent by their father the bishop. In appointing pas-
tors to permanent rectorships in this country, according to the HI.
council of Baltimore, the candidate must have labored in tiie dio-
cese for ten years, and during that time shown himself a capable
pastor, both in spiritual as well as in temporal things of the
church.' Benedict the XIV. laid down the rules to be followed
in electing such pastors, so that the unworthy may be excluded
and that the best maybe selected. The examination must be on mat-
ters relating to the pastoral office, before the bishop or his vicar
general, and before at least three of the clerical examiners of the dio-
cese," Having examined the candidates, the examiners report to
the bishop the names of those whom they think worthy for the
vacant parish, and the bishop can judge and appoint the one he
thinks most worthy.
To the Pope as the Vicar of Christ belongs the appointment of
all offices in the church. He is the supreme administrator of the
fold of'Christ. For to him was said in the person of Peter: "Feed
my lambs feed my sheep." When inferior administrators refuse or
neglect to fill vacancies, the Pope may supply their defect and fill
the vacant office. He can reserve the light of appointing to any
office in any diocese. He appoints the cardinals, the judges of the
Eoman courts, the ablegates of the Holy See, the bishops, the
archbishops, the pastors in certain dioceses, where the common
laws of the church obtain, even some of the canons of the cathe-
dral chapters, for he is the chief pastor of souls, the Vicar of him
who is the head of the church. From the days of Innocent VIII.
■Certain appointments were reserved to the Popes, and from the
XIII. century they reserved the appointments of offices in the
•chapters of the cathedrals, which become vacant during some
months of the year. This relates especially to benefices estab-
lished for the support of the clergy, for divine worship, and
for the confirmation of bishops elected by the diverse ways estab-
lished in different countries. This was done because abuses crept
into these appointments, and because the Holy See wished to re-
ward good clergymen and clerics, who had rendered great services to
religion, and also that the Pope might be indirect communication
with all parts of the world.' The Pope often promotes clergymen
to be monsignors, private chaplains, apostolic notaries, &c., in
many dioceses, thus making them members of the Roman diocese.
The appointment of all the patriarchs, primates, archbishops and
bishops of the world belongs to the Pope, from him they receive their
jurisdiction over the sheepfolds of Christ, so the Pope may appoint
the pastors under them. Hence in these countries where the
canon or common law of the church obtains, the Holy See appoints
some of the parish priests,* after the regular concursus for the
» Concll. III. Bait. n. 36. " Concil. Bait. n. 41. ^ Leurenius For. Benii. q. 525.
* Bouts De Parocbo Pars. 3d 9 rule.
514 WHO MAY BE APPOINTED PASTOR,
oflBce has been held. In France, according to the concordate of
1801, the bishops must nominate only pastors whom the govern-
ment accept.*
In missionary countries where the common law of the church
has not been promulgated, where the church is in an imperfect or
territorial state, the bishop appoints all rectors of parishes
and he removes nearly all of them at will. Where the church
has increased so as to become more fixed and stable, the laws of
the universal church are introduced, so that while the bishop may
change pastors, he must not do so without cause. "Where the
full canon laws obtains, when they refuse to go he can do so only
after a trial, where their unworthiness has been proved by a
regular legal process. In English speaking countries, where the
church is entirely free from government influence, she is independ-
ent in all her movements. This power of appointing to all offices in
the church resides in all its fulness in the Koman Pontiff, from
whom it flows down into the episcopacy." If the appointment has
been reserved to the Pope, the bishop cannot interfere when the
parish is vacant. But if the parish is not so reserved, the bishop
can appoint the pastor. No parishes of this country are reserved
to the Holy See.
As the Pope is the Vicar of Christ, what he does in the church,
he does for our dear Lord, for he rules the church for him, of
whom he is the prime minister. So in the diocese, the image of
the universal church, the vicar general of the bishop rules the dio-
cese in the absence of the latter. The vicar general then, or the
administrator of the diocese, can appoint a rector to a vacant
parish. At the death of the Pope the administrator of the church
universal belongs to the college of cardinals. On the death or
resignation of the bishop, the administration of the diocese falls on
the chapter or senate of the diocese, in countries where they exist.
But they cannot confer benefices, or appoint permanent rectors of
parishes, for they are only administrators till the see is filled.'
We now come to the candidate for a vacant parish. In the first
place the candidate must be in the 25th year,^ of sufficient knowl-
edge and of good morals. The council of Trent confirmed all
this which had been so often enacted by former councils.' Even the
bishop cannot dispense in this law. The proposed pastor must
have received at least tonsure, and he should be ordained at
least within a year a priest, as the sacraments depend on his
priesthood. These matters are looked into by the bishop, or the
authorities who appoint the pastor.
The union of the pastor with his parish is an image of the union
of Christ with his church universal. Our dear Lord espoused
forever his church, and nothing can ever dissolve that spiritual
matrimony. The union of the bishop with his people is an image
of the union of Christ with his church. Onlv death should part
' Pius VII. Bui. Eccl. Chrlsti. « Boulx De Parocho p. 327.
* Cap. Tic. Ne sede vacante. * Alexander III. In Conoil. Lat. GreR. X.
» Cap. Licet. U. T. 6. L. I. in 6.
HOW THE CHURCH PUNISHES THE GUILTY. 515
the pastor from his spiritual bride, his people. But we must not
look for perfection in this world. No priest or bishop can be as
perfect as our blessed Lord. The human and the divine elements
form the church, as the human and the divine blended in the one
Personality of Christ. The human nature in the priesthood tends
to fall away from the perfections of the priesthood of Jesus Christ.
The congregation then and the people who look for the perfections
of God in the clergy will be mistaken. Not understanding these
things, weak-minded people, who find faults in the clergy, tend to
fall away from the church, as though the church were founded on
men and not on her founder Christ. It matters little what the
priest does, the sacraments he administers are the holy ordinances
of God, the channels of. grace flowing from the fountains of the
Crucified, and they come direct into the hearts of the people, not
stopping on the way to pass by or through the priest, who admin-
isters them. Salvation comes direct from Christ into our souls.
The clergy may have their faults, but they are the faults of
individuals and not of the church, or of Christ who alone re-
deems.
Whence it follows that in every age some of the clergy have fall-
en under the weight of the weaknesses of mankind. They may
sin, but that does not poison the streams of salvation flowing fromt
the God-man, ever working by his Holy Spirit in the souls of men.
But when such sins have been deliberately and publicly com-
mitted so as to outrage public sentiment, the church punishes the
breaking of the laws. Hence bishops and pastors may be suspended,
deposed, excommunicated, or degraded from, the offices they dis-
grace. But like health, a man may lose his good name without
his fault. For no men are so exposed to being belied as the clergy.
Because of the dignity of the episcopacy, Rome alone deals with
bishops, the Pope, the bishop of bishops, alone can depose, degrade
or suspend them. The bishop of the diocese alone can deal with
a priest, unless the Holy See reserves him to itself. For heinous
crimes, the church may degrade a clergyman and deliver him to
the civil power to be punished. As it belongs not to the laity, but
to the church to ordain and appoint pastors, so to the church be-
longs the power of deposing clergymen. As the sacrament of
orders, like baptism, and confirmation, imprints a character in the-
soul, which ever remains even in the other life, so no one can-
ever be divested of his orders. But the exercise of these spiritual
powers may be suspended for crime. But the crime should be
proved in a regular court, subject to the rules of testimony, on
which the judgment of the court should be founded. A pastor
unwilling then should not be removed without a very grave cause..
His title should not be taken away without he willingly commits
a great crime, that can be proved before a court of justice, for
secret sins belong to the confessional only. If by reason of health,
or for other reasons, he becomes incapable of administrating his
parish, a coadjutor or an administrator should be appointed, while
516 HOW COADJUTORS AND ASSISTANTS ARE APPOINTED.
he remains the pastor. All these wise rules were established to
guard the rights of the office.
The extent of the parish, poor health, or other causes may ren-
der the pastor unable to attend to the spiritual wants of the peo-
ple. The bishop can send him an assistant priest. The latter is
called in English speaking countries the curate, assistant or chap-
lain. A coadjutor bishop must be a bishop consecrated. To
be a coadjutor, he must be in the same orders as the one he aids.
Thus the vicar-general, although he helps the bishop, is not his
coadjutor. A deacon who helps a pastor is not his assistant or
coadjutor, for the latter must be a priest. When by incurable de-
fect of either body or mind, a pastor cannot govern or administer
a parish, a coadjutor priest should be appointed to help him, he
retaining the title of pastor. But the council of Trent forbids
coadjutors to be appointed with the right of succeeding perma-
nent pastors.' But the council makes an exception for bishops and
abbois, when sufficient reasons are known to the Holy See, for such
appointments with the right of succeeding are contrary to the laws
of the church, in which alone the Pope can dispense.
The assistant must be supported from the revenues of the church
according to the statutes of the diocese, and the laws and regula-
tions of the church. If the pastor appeals against the appoint-
ment of an assistant, his appeal does not suspend the appointment,
but the bishop can execute the mandate, and wait the decision of
the higher courts of the church.
• The assistant must not be taken by the people as their pastor,
nor are they his people, for they belong to the pastor. He is there
as the assistant of the parish priest, to do his bidding, to take his
place, to administer the sacraments in his name. The assistant
then has not the title of the church, he has no call on the parish,
he can be changed at any time by the bishop. The assistants
are governed by all the rules of the church, as the pastors. The
pastor has the right of administering the sacraments to his peo-
ple, and the people should not go to another parish for the sacra-
ments without some good reason ; acting otherwise would sometimes
beeven grievously sinful.' Yet penitents can generally go anywhere
to receive the sacramemt of Penance, and also the Holy Eucharist,
except at Easter time. Each parish church should have a baptis-
mal font, where the converts and children must be baptised. If
one priest, without permission, baptizes the subjects of another
pastor without a reason he commits a mortal sin."
By the common laws of the church, the pastor has internal jur-
isdiction in the confessional. But the bishop mav reserve in the
diocese certain cases or sins, so that no priest of the diocese can
absolve of them. Only a few cases, as the salvation of souls may
require, should be reserved, for canonical pastors liavenot delegated
but ordinary jurisdiction, says Benedict XIV.* Although the jur-
> 868. 25 C. 7. * Vd. Boulx De Paroco p. 448. » De Paroctao p. 448.
** De Synod Dlooes. L. 5, c. 4. n. 3.
PAKOCHIAL RIGHTS. 517
isdiction of the pastor extends only to his pasirh, yet the Congre-
gation stated that the bishop may give pastors the faculties for the
whole diocese.' The pastor cannot give faculties to a priest from
another diocese to hear confessions in his parish. Only the bishop
€an do that, because the latter alone can give jurisdiction to strange
priests. The pastor can hear his own subjects in any place. The
pastor cannot dispense from vows, except by special faculties as
are granted for some cases to confessors. The pastor alone has by
common law the right to administer paschal Communion by him-
self or his assistants to his people. At the present time the pastor
cannot force his people to hear Mass or the Sunday sermon in his
church, for they can go to Mass to any church they choose.* With-
out cause, no priest can celebrate more than one Mass each day,
except on Christmas, when they may say three. But on Sundays,
when there are two congregations, or a large number of his people
who otherwise would be deprived of Mass, a priest can say two, one
Mass for each of them, but not without permission of the ordinary.
The council of Trent made a law obliging people to get married
before their own pastor, so that the marriage would be invalid if
contracted before any other priest. This law obliges only where
it has been duly promulgated. As far as we know that law, called
the law of clandestinity, has not been promulgated in this country,
except in some dioceses of the South and the West. When people
are about to be married, they should see at once there own pastor,
and make arrangments with him. It is a sin both for them and
for any other priest to marry them, the bishop or his delegate alone
excepted. If they be married before a minister, by that they are
excommunicated from the church. Such is the law in this
country. If one of the parties was not baptized, the marriage is
invalid, even when contracted before their own pastor, for a chris-
tian by a universal law of the church becomes incapable of mar-
riage with an unbaptized, till that impediment is removed by a
dispensation. No matter how long they live together, their union
is null and void, before God and before the church. As marriage
is a holy sacrament, and the church alone has the regulating of it,
no other power can interfere with the holy rites ordained by God.
Before marriage the parties should be called in the church, that
is have their banns proclaimed by the pastor or by his direction.
To the pastor belongs the marriage ceremony and the nuptial
blessing. But he can appoint another priest to take his place.
But as the bishop is the pastor of pastors in the diocese, he can
administer all the sacraments to the people in any parish. His
vicar-general can do the same, for he represents the bishop
throughout the whole diocese. But they should not do this un-
less there be some grave reason. The pastor should not marry
parties, unless their banns were called in the church, or unless
they obtained from the bishop a dispensation from the calls.
Pastors have been granted the authority of dispensing with one
i Aug, 1600 L. 9 Dec. p. 7. * Benedict xlv. De Syn, D. L. xl. c. U 7. il.
518 THE SUPPORT OF THE CLERGY.
call, and the good of souls sometimes requires them to marry in
certain cases without any calls, to prevent scandals. The pastor
should not marry people privately, without reason, for these wed-
dings are forbidden by the church, and they are causes of scandals-
and troubles.
It belongs to the pastor to anoint his people when they are-
sick unto death, so that no other priest except in case of necessity
can do so without sin. In former times it was such a sin to
anoint a person belonging to another parish without reason, that
a member of a religious order who did so without cause, in-
curred an excommunication reserved to the Pope. ' The same may
be said regarding the holy Viaticum or communion for the dying.
Even a canon or a member of the cathedral chapter had to be attend-
ed by the pastor in whose parish he lay dying. This was often
decided by the Holy See. The bishop alone is exempt from this
law, for he is the pastor of the whole diocese. The highest in dig-
nity in the chapter in former times anointed the dying bishop, and
prepared him for death in the presence of all the members of the
cathedral clergy." By this we see how carefully the church guards
the rights of the rector in these cases, so as to prevent people run-
ning around from church to church, and place to place. For the
pastor should know his sheep and give them their spiritual food^
and they should look to him for their spiritual wants.
We now come to the offerings of the people, the perquisites in
a parish. They belong to the pastor. The offerings for a Mass-
belong to the priest who says the Mass. The offerings for bap-
tisms, marriages, funerals, &c., belong to the rector. The pew
rents and other collections belong to the church. From them the
expenses of the church, the livings of the clergy, the salaries of
sextons, organists, &c., are paid. The custom of the place, the stat-
utes of the diocese, and the councils regulate these things. In this
country the rector or treasurer of the parish keeps a cash book, in
which all the revenues, not belonging to the pastor, are entered,
as well as the expenses. A report signed by the rector and the
trustees each year he sends to the bishop. In this way the account-
is balanced at stated times. There is never any cause of sus-
picion on this head, for the church makes wise laws to protect
the rector from being wrongfully accused regarding financial mat-
ters. When money or property is left to the church for any ob-
ject, it should be devoted to the object. The pastor in justice
can demand his living from the people he serves. * The livings
of the clergy are regulated by the bishop, or by the statutes and
customs of the diocese. The amount a clergyman receives is very
small considering his work, as he does not work for money but
for the salvation of souls. The rectorship is an office which he
holds for life, and he receives only enough so that lie can live like
a gentleman — as becomes his high and holy position as the minis-
' Clement I. de Prlv. » CsBremon. L. 2. C. 88, 8. 4.
• Barbosain dn Parocbo C. 34, n. 12.
REGULATIOKS REGARDING FUNERALS. 519
ter of Christ. *' Who serves the altar lives by the altar. "^ If a
priest saves money from his livings and from the offerings given
him by his people, or from a benefice, that is his business, and he
is free to dispose it during life or at his death, like any other man.
The pastor can regulate, under the supervision of the bishop
the offerings for funerals and high Masses in his parish. The of-
ferings for low Masses are regulated by the customs of the diocese.
When the bishop enacts rules for the whole diocese, the pastor and
people must follow them, for the diocese contains the parish, and
the bishop has legislativepower over all the parishes in his diocese.
Few clergymen have more than enough for their living, while some
of them are poor. The Jews were commanded by God to give for
the support of religion the tenth part of their revenues, the first
fruits of the earth, the first born of their flocks and of their chil-
dren. This was the custom in the middle ages, and the remains
may be seen to-day in the tithes, still exacted in some catholic coun-
tries. Few ever miss what they give for the support of religion.
The sums of money given for drink, for dissipation and for foolish
things, mount up into countless millions compared with the small
pittances given to God's worship, or for the saving of souls.
The rector has the right of burying his people for it is a religious
ceremony. ^ The funeral belongs to the pastor in whose parish the
person dies, or to the pastor whose church the deceased has chosen
for his funeral, not to the pastor in whose cemetery the dead will
be buried. But every one can select the cemetery in which they
wish their remains to rest. ' In this country converts, whose family
have a lot in a protestant cemetery, or catholics in good faith who
before the law was made bought such a lot, may be buried there
and the grave blessed by the rector, who can hold the funeral
ceremony either at the house or at the church, unless the bishop
forbid it. * No priest must officiate at a funeral in another church,
without the consent of the rector of that parish, for it is not his
church,
A pastor is obliged to attend the funerals of the very poor with-
out exacting any offering. But if they want a high Mass, he
can demand the usual offering, for a Requiem High Mass is an unusu-
al ceremony. The rector can dispense, or declare that a person is
dispensed from fasting from food or abstaining from meat, on the
days prohibited. He can also allow the people to work on holy-
days when necessary.
Religious orders can build a monastery or convent in the parish
without the consent of the pastor, for as they belong to the church
universal, by authority of the Bishop of Rome they can erect their
houses in any part of the world, when they get the permission of
the bishop of the diocese.
The council of Trent requires permanent pastors, and all having
the care of souls to make a profession of faith and obedience under
' I. Cor. Ix. 13. 2 Innocent III. 3 Tit- de Sepul. 12.
' I. de Sepult. et Licet 4. « III. Coacll. Bait. n. 318.
520 REGULATIONS REGARDING FUNERALS, ETC.
oath to the Roman Pontiff, according to the constitution of Pius
IV.' For neglecting or refusing, he may be deprived of the rev-
enues of his office. The council of Trent also commands both
bishops and pastors to live in their dioceses and parishes. The
bishop must not without cause be away for more than three, or the
pastor for more than two months, unless they have permission from
their superiors. Assistants and coadjutors are bound the same
way. But the common law allows all clergymen to take a vacation
each year, or to attend to pressing business. The danger of
catching a fatal disease will not excuse a pastor from residing in
his parish, and attending his people when sick with such diseases.
The pastor must keep regular records for baptisms, marriages,
confirmations, burials, moneys received and paid out. In the
baptismal records, he puts down the name of the baptized, the date
of birth and of baptism, the father, mother and sponsors. He
enters in the marriage records the names of the man and wife, the
witnesses and the date of the marriage. The book of confirmation
is wherein he keeps a record of those confirmed, and the date of the
bishop's visitation to the parish.
Every pastor must, ordinarily speaking, say Mass on Sundays and
holydays for the people of his parish. He must also preach the
Gospel, and explain the teachings of religion and the means of
salvation to the people. He alone is the judge of the matter and
the way of instructing them. The pastor has the right of preaching
if he wishes, or he can appoint another to do so in his place.
The temporal administration of the parish, the revenues of the
church, &c., are controlled in various ways. In some states, as in
New York and New Jersey, this is done by a board of trustees com-
posed of the pastor and two laymen, elected either by the bishop,
by the pastor, or by the congregation as the bishop may determine.
All business matters and temporals of the parish come before them.
The pastor is by his office president of the local board. The full
board comprises with these mentioned the bishop and his vicar-
general. At a meeting of the full board by right of office the
bishop presides. This corporation owns all the church property
in trust for the congregation. If the pastor and two laymen cannot
agree it is brought before the full board. No lay trustees can be
appointed without the consent of the pastor. *
> 868. 24 0. 12. * ConcU. Bait. n. 284 to 288.
The Religious Orders.
-HE religious orders do not belong to the essence
of the church. The church could live without
them. For the church lived and flourished
and brought forth countless saints, before
the establishment of the diverse brotherhoods and
sisterhoods now so flourishing. Only the Papacy
and the episcopacy belong to the essence of the
church, and to take them away, the teaching church
would go with them, and there would be no one to
teach the laity, or to ordain ministers to continue the
saving works of the eternal Priesthood of our bless-
ed Lord.
In the Gospel we find two kinds of teachings —
the commands of Christ and the counsels of our
Lord. The commands of Christ as well as the ten
commandments form the laws of God, which were
given to rule the mystic body of the Lord, his
church. They are the perfecting of human reason.
To break them is sin and damnation for the sinner.
No Pope, council, or legislative body can change
them, as they came direct from Christ or from God,
and the same authority which made them only
can change them.
But in the Gospel and in the Bible, we find
many advices or counsels for the guidance of men,
621
,^C10'« .«««B«A«S ^O.* ,j^^^ ^^^^
A LAW BINDS, AN ADVICE DOES NOT. 623
which are well to follow or not to follow, but not to follow is not a sin.
Por an advice does not bind as a law. When we ask a person's advice,
we are not obliged to follow it. Jesus told a young man to go sell what
he had, give it to the poor and to come and follow him if he wished
to be perfect; he told his disciples when they were struck on one
cheek to turn the other cheek to the striker ; if a man asked of
them their cloak he told them to give also their coats, and he
told them not to take the second coat when they went forth to con-
vert the nations. These were not commands but advices, which
they were free to follow or not. Many are the words of our Lord,
which are good advices but not laws. To follow his laws is to be
saved. To follow his counsels or advices is to be perfect. His
laws bind under sin but his counsels do not.
The whole church both clergy and laity follow the commands or
precepts of Christ, while the religious orders follow not only the
commands but also the counsels or the advice of Christ. They
ever strive to be perfect, more perfect than the other members of
the church and by such lives to gain a higher place in heaven.
In them the divine life of God the Holy Ghost develops not only the
laws of Christ, but also the advices of Christ, which lead them to
higlier perfection than the simple laws which rule the rest of the or-
ganization of the church.
To get the right idea of the religious orders, we must consider
the whole organization of the church, ever ruled by the laws of
nature, by the laws of God given in the revelation in the Gospel,
by the special laws of the church, at the same time governed by the
laws of the nations under which the various members live. These
are the four codes of laws for the whole church. But there will
be many persons in the church, who feel not satisfied with these
ordinary laws ; they will not be content with keeping from sin, by
obeying tlie laws only They will look for a higher and more
perfect st<-ite ; these souls dear to God, will feel called to follow the
counsels of Christ — call to sell all they have, give to the poor and
follow him — follow not only his laws and keep from sin, but also
choose to follow his counsels, and by that gain more holiness in
this world, and a higher place in heaven.
Then the religious state is an external profession of christian
perfection ; it is the perfection of the christian religion ; the ful-
filment of the baptismal vows ; the completion of christian holiness.
The keeping of the simple laws of the church and of the govern-
ment relates to justice, while the keeping of the counsels of our
Lord in the Gospel relates to charity, that is to the union of pious
souls with God. The very essence of the religious orders is to
strive towards the perfections of the christian life. The religious
try first to become perfect themselves, and then they labor for the
good of their neighbors. They die for themselves to live for others.
Following the example of their Lord, who delivered himself up for
others, the members of the religious orders devote their lives to the
good of their neighbors.
524 THE vows OF POVERTY, CHASTITY, AND OBEDIENCE.
The church universal, filled with the Holy Ghost, is by its very
nature holy. But the members of the church are not equal in
holiness. Some are holier and more perfect than others, for
there are many mansions in our Father's house left vacant by the
angles' fall, and to these were we called, and in this life there are
many ranks or stages in our approach to God. While the larger part
of the race marry and bring forth children, yet God calls others to
the higher state of virginity. These, listening to his inward voice,
renounce the world, the flesh, their own wilful desires and enter
the religious orders.
Holiness then is the very essence of the religious life. With-
out that holiness as its object, there can be no religious life. But
men can unite for many other ends than a holy life. Man and
woman join in wedlock for the propagation of the race, men form
companies to make money or for pleasure. But these are not
religious orders, for their ends are worldly, and they are for
the temporal advancement of the members. But when bodies of
men or of women unite to promote personal holiness, these are
religious associations.
But we must take men as we find them, born of the fallen race
of Adam with all the weakness of the race. We are attached to
the creatures of this world, and the things we see make deeper im-
pressions on us than the things of eternit}^ — visible things attract
and drag us down to their own level, creatures ever draw us from
God. The passions of the soul for worldly things may be re-
duced to three heads — the love of creatures, the instinct of prop-
agating our race, and the love of our own free will. Man has
not only a soul but also a body. By property and possession,
the goods of this world become his, and his means of bodily com-
fort are much increased. The race was not all created at once
by God as the angels, but the child is born of man and woman
in wedlock, an image of the Holy Trinity. ' The instinct of prop-
agating the race is in the nature of man, and of all other passions
it is the most abused. The will guides man in all his reasonable
acts. Being the head of creation, man instinctively loves to have
his own way in all things, and it is not pleasant for man to be
under another.
It would be impossible for men or women to live in religious
orders afflicted with all these passions. They would continually dis-
pute about property, quarrels would arise about the possessions
of each, many families could not live in the same house, their
children would fight and quarrel, and no house could be built
large enough for numerous united families, while Avithoutaunion
of strength they would divide and separate. To remedy these
evils the church offers three remarkable remedies or measures
never before proposed by man, and never put in practice outside
the church. Thev are the three vows ofpovertv, chastity and obedi-
ence. Thus with the wisdom of the Holy Ghost, the three great
> See Han tbe Mirror of tbe UniTeree by tbe Autbor.
THE PERFECTION OF THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS. 525
evils of the fallen man are rooted out at their very source. All
the advices or couucils of our Lord in the Gospels may be reduced
to these three heads, and by keeping these three vows the mem-
bers of religious orders keep the councils of our Lord in their most
heroic degree. We read of heroes and we admire their heroism,
but the heroism of the saints transcends all the heroism of the
world. For real nobility does not consist in conquering others,
but inovercommg ourselves. "He that overcometh himself is
greater than he that taketh a city. " '
By these three vows, the members of the religious orders detach
themselves from the things of this world, that they may be free
from earthly passions, that they may rise towards God, untramelled
by the weight of creatures. On earth they live the lives of the
angels of heaven. Angels have no bodies. For them material
things are useless. Wlience they have no possessions or dominion
over material things. ' They do not propagate their race, for they
have no generative powers. Divided by their nature into nine
choirs, one above another, each rank consists of countless numbers,
each individual spirit is a complete species or race in itself, they
obey one the other, the lower are subject to the higher, with the
eternal Son of God at their head — thus God at creation formed
the ranks of the angelic hosts. The religious orders resemble the
countless hosts of heaven, ever standing before the throne of God
worshipping the Almighty.
The property of the religious belong in common to the whole
order, they have no care for the things of this world, they curb
tiie passions of fallen nature, they obey their superiors on earth,
they live the life of angels, they practice lives of heavenly virtue,
inasmuch as it is possible for fallen man. Since mankind lost
the delights of paradise, there is no other state of life so peaceful,
so separated from the turmoils of life, so independent of the anx-
ieties and the crosses of this fallen state. But this is only for
those whom God calls to that perfect state. For those, who enter
without a call, or for those, Avho b}' their own fault have lost wholly
or in part their divine call, the religions state is a hell. The re-
ligious must first he sure that God calls him to that state, and
then take care that by his own sin he does not lose that call, and
all the graces belonging to it. Having arrived at that state where
he loves no creature, where all liis love is for the Creator, no crea-
ture can afflict him, and the Creator rewards them with his choic-
est blessings. No one can love a creature, but that creature will
sooner or later afflict him, because man was made to love God and
him alone. But for tlie good of the race and for the perfecting
of the individual, God has implanted the family instincts, and
the desire of worldly things in the hearts of those whom he calls
to "worldly lives, while to those whom he calls to the religious
life he fills Avith the desiies of the heavenly perfections. The
way then to know if you are called to the religious life, is to con-
^ Psalm. ' Card. De I.uro De Jusilcia et Jure.
526 OBJECT OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE.
suit your own heart and seek what the Creator has imphanted there.
The members of the religions orders live like the angels of
God; they marry not, neither are they given in marriage; their lives
begin the eternal life of heaven. By chastity they are married to
the " Lamb of God, " by poverty they take God as their eternal
inheritance, and by obedience they obey the Son of God, whom
they see represented in their superiors. Bnt as the things of heav-
en are seen only in their shadows iiere below, so one mnst not look
for the perfections of heaven in the imperfections of earth. The
religious fulfil the baptismal vows by their regular lives. Buried
in Christ by the waters of baptism^ dead to their friends and to
the world, in his death they live only for Christ, for the church,
and for the benefit of their neighbors. Taking into account that
all are not called to such a perfection in this world, Christ does not
invite every one baptized to the perfections of the convent and tlie
monastery. Those whom he loves with a special and particuhir
love, them alone he calls, while tlie greater pavt of the members
of the church still retain their attachments to worldly things, till
the moment of their death, when temporal goods will be useless
to tliem in eternity. Thus the religious orders, even while living
in this world, approach the perfections of that othei- high and lieav-
enly life, by purifying the soul from certain attachments to things
below us.
The members of the religious orders, the monks and nuns of the
church live by their lives the words of St. Paul: '* Know ye iiot
that all we, who were baptized in Christ Jesus, are baptized in his
death. For we are buried together with him by baptism unto death,
that as Christ is risen from the death by the glory of the Father,
so we also may walk in the newness of life. For if we have been
planted together in the likenes"? of his death, we slnill be also in the
likeness of his resurrection. Knowing this, that our old 7uan is
crucified with him. that the body of sin may be crucified, to the
end that we may serve sin no lonjrer. For he thntis dead is justi-
fied from sin. Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we
shall live with Christ. &c. ' Thus the members of the religious
orders follow the counsels of the Saviour. Dying to themselves
they live but for God. and for the good of their neighbors. But
the external habit of the religious will not .save them, unless
they follow their rules and become more or less perfect. Becjiu?e
if one belongs to the church, it will not save him unless he follow
its divine teachings. 'I'hose belonging to the spirit of the church
form a part of the invisililo body of Christ, they may still live un-
known in the world and follow the connsel.sof the gospel. These
may be leally religious, and they may become more perfect thaii the
members of the religious orders, with all their external profession
made before the church, when they do not put it in practice in
their daily lives.
As the religious orders tend to the perfection of the members,,
• Kom. V. 3. 1 Q.
OarOIif OF THE RELIGIOUS ORDERS. 527
and the object is to make them saints, it follows that the religious
orders are founded in the holiness of the church. They are theex-
ternul showing forth of the in visible holiness of the church universal.
For the churcli, the spouse of Christ, is holy by the indwelling of
the Holy Ghost, and the external profession of the religious orders
of the church is the outside expression of that holiness, which the
church enjoins on all her members. They carry that holiness
within their souls, hidden from the world. As the clergy, the of-
ficers of the church, form the highest and the most perfect part
of tlie bride of Christ, they too are called to all the perfections of
the holiness of the church, even to the highest perfections of the re-
ligious. Although the secular clergy do not take the three vows of
the religious orders at ordinations, they should cultivate the spirit
of the poverty, chastity and the obedience of the members of the
religious orders. For that reason St. "i'homassays that the bishop,
the summit of the sacrament of holy orders, should be poor in spirit
and have all the perfections of the religious. ' Thus we see that
the religious orders are like the exterior vestments of the church,
the beautiful bride of Christ.
The religious orders then form one of the chief branches of the
living trunk of Christ and it bears the finest fruit. As all the
members of the church were called to that internal perfection, of
which the religious orders are the external expression, it follows
that the internal profession of that perfection belongs to the
essence of the church. The essence of a thing is that without
which it cannot be. Therefore we conclude that the perfections
of the religious orders belong to the essence of the church, and it
was in the church from the very beginning. Thus we read that at
the foundation of the church at Jerusalem, the people sold their
goods and brought them to the feet of the apostles, and they spent
their whole time in prayer, like the religious orders at the present
time. The apostles were the first religious. While living with
our Lord, they had all things in common, and Judas kept the pnrse,
which was the common money of tiie little band. After the
ascension of our Lord, the rising church at Jerusalem offered the
world the example of a completed religious order, comprising the
members of the whole church. The example was given them by
our Lord himself, who while on earth lived with the apostles,
having all temporal things in common with them. Li every part
of the world where the church had spread in the apostolic age, the
Holy Ghost formed the dioceses and the parishes on the model of
the church at Jerusalem, having their goods in common, all un-
der the direction of the first bishops and priests.
As our Lord used to spend his nights and parts of his days in
solitude in the deserts, fasting and praying, this example was
followed by the laity and clergy of the early church. When lay
persons spent their lives in the solitudes of the deserts, they were'
called ascetics, hermits, ancorites, &c. The early history of the
• Sum. Theo. Ila Ilae Q. olxxxiv. a. 5.
528 THE RELIGIOUS OF THE EARLY CHURCH.
church is filled with stories of the reliofions of the deserts. That
was before the establisliment of the religious orders proper. The
early bishops, disciples of the apostles^ practised the religious life
to the highest degree.
From the very beginning of the church, holy souls felt called to
a higher state of perfection. These members of the church, not
satisfied with practising the commands of the Gospel, but wishing
to follow as well the counsels of Christ, they took vows of virginity,
sold all their goods to feed the poor, and lived as religious among
the laity. In the early church they did not form a body separate
from the laity. They were known alone to the clergy, they took
their vows in secret under the advice of their confessor. Even to
this day the laity may take vows in secret, in the confessional.
The early church was filled with religious men and women
practising among the people the most heroic virtues. The bishops
appointed special priests to take charge of these religious persons.
Thus within the dioceses of the early church, we find the commu-
nites of the perfect christians, for besides the regular organization
of the diocese, rose the convents and monasteries for both sexes.
Their title is mentioned in the council of Chalcedon.' The
religious then we find were from the very beginning of ciiristianity.
They were few at the beginning, but as the wants of the people
increased, also grew up colleges of religious priests, assisted by
deacons, subdeacons and ministers, each having his duties marked
out by the superiors.' They had an organization similar to that
of the diocese. They differed from the secular clergy only in the
practise of a higher religious life. They were a complete church,
but a more perfect church by the flourishing of the virtues of a
more perfect state. Fully organized, these religious communities
were governed by a double authority, that of tlieir own superioi-s
sent to them by the bishop, and by the bishop himself, who had
supreme authority over them.
Pushed on by the Spirit of God, many penetrated into the
wildest and most secluded places, where free from the distracting
cares of the world, they lived the most heroic lives of solitude and
of prayer. "When the dioceses and the parishes became vacant,
the clergy and laity often chose the bishops and the pastors from
the ranks of these solitaries and saints. Thus Sts. Bazel, the two
Cyrils, Chrystom, and nearly all the great men of the early ages
came from the solitude of their retreats, to rule the churches to
which they had been elected by the votes of both clergy and people.
At no time did the church have greater men at the head of tlio-
ceses, in the great historic churches, than these men chosen
from the solitudes of the Levant.* Later nearly all the abbots
were ordained priests by the bishop in whose diocese the commun-
ity was established. The abbots used to confer the lower orders
on the inferior ministers of their orders. Its vestiges remain even
to our day, abbots can give tonsure and ordain the clergy to mi-
> CODcU. Cbtd. Can. 0. ' Concil. Arelat an. 445. ' GreR. Mag. U VL Epist. UK.
DIFFEKENCE BETWEEIS" SECULARS. AND REGULARS. 529
nor orders. When a synod of the diocese was called, the priests of
the religious orders took part in the deliberations of the clergy.
Bat as the religious orders were established later than the dioceses,
as they had superiors more directly over them, they came in a place
second only to the secular clergy of the diocese. That is the prac-
tice even in our day. This is seen in the early councils. In com-
munities with numerous members, the abbot often became the
archpriest or the vicar -general of the bishop. As timewent by
many more members of the communities became priests, that they
might say mass, attend to the spiritual wants of the monks and
laity of the surrounding country. The monks not only looked
after the spiritual wants of the community, but they converted the
pagans of the Eoman empire. Then the bishop appointed them
pastors of these converted peoples whom they had brought into the
church. To avoid conflicts between the clergy of the diocese and
the monks, about the IX. century the councils enacted many regu-
lations, defining the limits of the authority of the monastic orders.*
The history of the church in these ages shows the immense labors of
the monks in christianizing the rude peoples of these times. All
Europe felt the works of these holy men. Only God knows the
hardships they underwent to soften the morals of the race, and to
drive out the abominable corruptions of the Roman empire. They
penetrated to every race, tribe, and tongue, preaching to all men
Christ and him crucified . By the lapse of ages, some of these mon-
asteries became not only parish churches, but also episcopal sees,
even many had archiepiscopal jurisdiction over other bishops, be-
cause they were the residence of the archbishops. In these cases
the members of the community were appointed to the titles of the
churches of the city, as were the priests belonging to the regular
diocesan clergy.
The ordinary clergy of the dioceses were called the secular clergy,
and the clergy of the monasteries were named the regular or ascetic
clergy, a distinction observed even in our day.' In the council
of Laodicia, Pope Sixtus called all the clergy, both canonic and
monastic to meet in tlie basilica of Helena. This distinction be-
tween the secular or canonic and the monastic clergy is mer.tioned
in the Capitulesof Charlemagne." It was held throughout the mid-
dle ages, even the council of Trent shows the difference between
the benefices of the clergy of the diocese and those of the monks.
Although the secular clergy of the diocese was organized by
Christ in the persons of the apostles and their disciples, yet the
church calls all her clergy to the perfection of the religious. If
the secular clergy of the diocese do not take the vows of poverty
and of obedience like the monks, still they are called to the same
in spirit. St. Jerome writing of this says that the clergy are thus
named from the Greek word "cleros" meaning a part, an inherit-
ance, for the ministei'S of Christ have chosen the Lord as their
> Concll. Constan. in 531! Synod Auxer. Synod Roman Can. under Pope Eii^enius II. &c.
^ Concil. Mogiint. Cap. U in 847. ^ Concil. Laod. Can. 90 held in 314.
* Capt. L. VI. C. 301.
.530 HOW RELIGIOUS ORDERS ARE FOUKUED.
inheritance; like the priestly tribe of Levi, they receive no inber-
iiance in the promised land, for the Lord God alone is their
part and their inheritance. ' To this day nearly all the religions
orders have not only priests, but also brothers, who never ascend to
the priesthood or receive any of the holy orders. But they are
as much bound to follow the counsels of the Gospel, as are
the clergy. We must not fall into the error of supposing that the
religious orders came later than the secular clergy of the church,
for Pope Pius V. says: "The regular canons derive their origin
from the apostles."* The words of St. Jerome are: "Whatever
is found in the monks is more abundantly among the clergy, who
are the fathers of monks. *' The monastery and the religious as-
sociations or communities are real parishes, with all the notes of
true parishes or dioceses, ruled by the common laws of the
church. They are the most perfect of the churches, living with-
in the womb of the church universal, living her life and drawing
from her their spiritual nourishment. As each diocese and paiish is
the church universal, individualized and particularized and vis-
ible where it exists, like each man is universal human nature
individualized with all the peculiarities of his own individuality,
so each religious community has its own peculiar ways, customs,
and characteristics.
The members of the religious orders in the Ejist separated one
from another from the beginning. Then each was free to
follow the bent of his own inclinations. When driven to the
West by persecutions, they formed and united again under the
common law of St. Benedict, and in place of living separate they
began to unite into communities. But numerous ditferent orders
sprang up, each with its own peculiar rules and customs, so that
in our day there are a great many difiFerent religious orders in the
church. Under the leivdership of the Holy Spirit, they have
banded into associations for the perfection of the members, some-
what as we see in ourday, business men form associations for busi-
ness, pleasure, and money making, each stockholder having a part of
the profits, according to the amount of his money in the company.
As the religious orders relate to the whole church, and not to
ajiy one diocese or nation alone, thus it comes to pass that before
they can exist, they must have the approbation of the head of the
church, the Roman PontilT. For no other bishop has ordinary
authority or jurisdiction over all the church. Therefore when a
saint established his order, he first got the approval of the Pope.
This is seen in the lives of all the founders of religious orders.
They received their impulse from the Holy Spirit, then the Vicar
of Christ established them by his supreme authority. But as the
bishop is the ruler of his dio(;ese, and the head of his diocese un-
der the Roman Pontiff, before any religious order comes into the
diocese the members must get tlie permission of the bishop of the
diocese. As the church universal profits by their labors, they
> St. Uier. Epist. 111. ad Nepot. ' Bull Cum ex ordlnem Dec. 19, 1570.
THE ESSENCE OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE. 531
belong to her, their bishop is tlie Pope, who alone in this world
has universal spiritual jurisdiction. They are apostles in the
sense tiiat they belong to the whole church, and every diocese into
which they come has the benefit of their labors. Often in this
cr-uitry they have charge of parishes, asylums, schools, colleges,
reformatories, in fact every work for the bettering of human life.
"JMie reader will now understand that there are two things to
consider in the Gospel words of our Lord, the law by which we
enter heaven, the council by wliich we get a higher place tlian those
who keep the law.' " If thou wilt enter into life keep the command-
ments." " If you wish to be perfect go sell what thou hast and
give it to the poor .... and come and follow me." ' Then the differ-
ent states of life may be reduced to three— the married state, the
religious life, and the state of celibacy in the world.
The religious state is a lasting mode of life, approved by the
church for those v.iio living under a regular rule, and strive to
perfection under the vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience. It
is a lasting kind of life, because by these three vows, they bind
themselves for life. As it is a holy community, it must be ap-
proved by the Pope, who alone has supreme authority in spiritual
things. In former times each bishop could approve any new
order in his diocese. But Innocent III., during the Lateran
Council, seeing so many new orders arising, forbade new ones to
be founded without the approval of the Pope. They must strive
towards perfection, for tiiat is the very essence of the religious
life, and the object for which the order was instituted. It is not
the essence of the order that they be all perfect, but that they
must try to be perfect. It is necessary that they take at least
simple vows, not solemn vows, although most of the orders of men
take solemn vows.* Those who take these three vows, and live
according to a rule approved by the Pope, form religious. But
these are not real religious, who although they take these three
vows, yet do not live according to such an approved rule. These
may be approved by the bishop in whose diocese they live, but in
that case they are only pious associations of either men or women
belonging to tliat diocese, but not to the universal church, because
they were not formally approved by the Bishop of Rome, vv'ho
alone can legislate for tiie church universal. Before God tiiey
will have the same reward for their good works as the members of
regular religious orders. At the present time the Holy See does
not readily approve religious orders, only approving them as
simple religious congregations bound by simple vows, which may
be dispensed much more easily, because of the troubles, the revolu-
tions, and attacks to which the religious orders are exposed at the
present time iti many parts of the world.'' Tliese taking vows for
life, of poverty, chastity and obedience to their bishop or to their
confessor, are not regular religions, because thev do not live sub-
ject to superiors. By decree of Pope Pius IX., when religious
' Math. xix. ir. 2 Math. v. 21. » Bull Gregorli XIII. * Analecta J. P.
532 RULES OF THE NOVITIATE.
have made their novitiate, they take simple vows for three years,
and tlien they may take solemn vows for iife. For good reasons
the taking of these solemn vows which bind for life may be post-
poned.' But the solemn profession cannot be put off' for more
than 25 years. This long probation under only simple vows, is to
try them well before admitting tliem to vows which bind them for
life, so that the bishop may dispense them from these simple
vows if they leave the community,' or if they be sent away by their
superiors. But they cannot bo sent away because of sickness only.
Even those who take only simple vows, partake in all the privileges
of the order, the same as the regularly professed.
That these vows bind, they must be at least 16 years old, make
one year of the novitiate, for that time wear the religious habit,
have no impediment, be received by the su])erior and freely give
their consent. It is the duty of the bishop to find out, either by
himself, by his vicar-general or by others delegated by him, who
may see that young ladies freely enter a convent, that they be not
unlawfully or unwillingly detained there, even after they have
made their profession. If she were forced to take vows, the vows
would be invalid. The whole year of the novitiate from the day
of taking the habit is so necessary, that if it lacks even a day, the
profession would be invalid.' If they interrupt their novitiate, even
for two hours, they must begin again a new novitiate.* If a relig-
ious without permission go aAvay with the intention of not re-
turning, when sent away by the superior, when they leave without
permission and go into another religious house, or to a house of
the same order in another province during their novitiate, they
interrupt their novitiate, so that they must begin over again. Sick-
ness preventing them attending all the exercises, or if they by
force they be driven from the house and return as soon as they can,
if with permission they spend a little time with their relatives out-
side, if falsely accused, and when the truth is found out they be
taken back, or if they undertake a journey at the command of
tiieir superiors, these interruptions do not render their novitiate
invalid. These rules have been made to prevent any one being de-
tained against his or her will in a religious order, and to make them
finish their novitiate, so as to try well if they have been called to
that state of life.
The first object of the religious life is to tend towards perfection
by these three vows and by the rules of the order. If they keep
not these vows, they are religious only in name but not in heart.
If they often break their vows, or if they do not obey the rules of
the order in important matters they sin mortally. But if led by
strong temptations, or think their vows and rules not necessary for
their salvation, or if they be guilty only of small things, or do
so from habit, they are guilty only of venial sins. Some writers
think that if they often break the rules of the house, they sin mor-
" Eplsl. S. Conjnv. neg. die 19 Mart. 185T. - Ibidpm die 25 Feb. 1858.
= Concll. of Trent. ■• 8. CoagtvgtMo.
%
WHAT BINDS UNDER SIN. 533
tally, because these rules were made to guide them to perfection.
It is not likely that they sin mortally, who keep the commandments
which bind under mortal sin, but break frequently the counsels of
the Gospel, tlie rules of the house, &c., which bind only under ve-
nial sin. But it is certain that sucli religious live in continual
danger of mortal sin, because their neglect is a kind of contempt
of the rules of their holy state, which was made to guide them to
perfection. The rules of the order itself in general do not bind
under sin. But the matters of the vows and the express commands
of the superiors should be obeyed. But there is always a wrong
in breaking these rules, full of wisdom for the guidance of the re-
ligious. The superior himself would sin if he should neglect to
correct the faults of the members of the order.
The members of religious orders professed for the choir, and the
clergy in the sacred orders must recite the divine oflHce each day
under pain of sin. That obligation begins from the day of their
ordination to subdeaconship, of religious profession, or when they
take solemn vows. But in religious orders, where they only recite
the Virgin's office, they are not bound under mortal sin to say it,
even when they take solemn vows in female orders. That was often
decreed by the Holy See. The same we say regarding the com-
munities, where they say certain prayers or recite psalms and
litanies. When there is reason for leaving the community, or when
for any reason they cannot recite their office, the Pope can dispense
them, because the whole matter belongs to the legislation of the
church, ' and not to the divine law established by Christ. AVhat
the Pope made he can unmake, but only God can repeal what he
has established, and those principles which flow from the natural
laws of reason. When during persecutions many monks and nuns
left their religious orders and married, Pius VIL dispensed them
from their vows, so that their marriages became valid. But seldom
the Popes dispense priests and bishops from the vow of chastity.
Once when the royal house of Poland became almost extinct, so that
only one maa and he a priest remained, the Pope dispensed him
from his vow of chastity,' and commanded him to marry so as to
continue the family. When his son became of age, he resigned his
throne, crowned his son in his place, and then retired to his mon-
astery.
God calls certain persons to the religious state and gives them
the graces to live according to that mode of life. He leaves others
to marry, and gives them the grace of marriage. That call is an
act of his divine providence, not in nature but the supernatural act-
ing in the human soul, as St. Paul speaking of the priesthood says:
*' Let no one take the honor, but who is called as Aaron was. "*
The same may be said about a religious vocation. Iso one is
obliged to follow the counsels or advices of the Gospel, for an ad-
vice does not bind like a law. But when a person is called to the
religious state, he has from God the graces of that state, and not
' Extravagantes Joan. xxil. Tit. C. et Bull. Assi; Com. GrcR. XIII. ' Heb. v. 4.
#
534 RULES RELATING TO PROP,EKTY.
thegnices of any other kind of life. It would be very dangerons
for him not to follow the divine cjill, for being deprived of the
grac3 of any other state in life, ho would live without any grace of
a state, in great danger of damnation. In the same way it would
be a great sin for any one to enter a religious order, feeling that
be had no vocation for that kind of life, for he would live in a
continual state of unrest, and disturb the whole community. A
parent who would prevent a cliikl from entering either the ranks
of the clergy, or a religious order, knowing that the child was
called to that state, he would commit a great sin. It would like-
wise be a great sin for a family to force one of their children to
take holy orders, when they knew he had not a divine call. For
he would be a disgrace to the clergy, because not having the gracHj
of the priesthood, he would live only with great difficulty a
priestly life. The best signs of a vocation are a continual desire,
and the facility and aptitude of fulfilling the duties of that state.
The member of any religious order approved by the church,
who takes a solemn vow of poverty, renders himself incapable of
having pro[)erty in his own Jiame, unless with the permission of
his superior. ' The community in general has temporal goods,
unless its constitution forbids it. Then by the vow of ])overty, tlie
members of a religious order have nothing, not even the clothes
they wear, nor can they either validly or legally have even the
property left them by their pnrents or friends. They can neither
give nor take temporal goods of any kind. The religious, who
take only simple vows of poverty may have property, but they can-
not dispose it without the permission of their superior, whether
the order has been approved either by the Holy See, or by the bish-
op alone. For by taking the vow of poverty, they bind themselves
to have nothing in this world, to live like our Lord, who had noth-
ing, not even a place whereon to lay his head. The religious not
oidy have no goods of this world, but they are bound lo weed out
of their hearts all affections for temporal things. They would even
violate the virtue of their vow by the desire of having the things of
this world. All they have belongs to the (immunity in general, and
the community gives them everything they want, clothes, money,
travelling expenses, &c. Before the law, a member of a religions
order has all his property, rigiits. &c., because the vow of poverty
has only an effect in religion and in the church. Then members
of the religious orders being free from the distracting care of tem-
poral things, they can devote their time to the work before them^
better than if they were troubled with the distract'ons of temporal
things.
By the vow of poverty the christian divests himself of the exter-
nal things of this world. But by the vow of einistity, he rejects
the pleasures of the senses, not only forbidden by the divine law
and the law of reason, but he even denies himself those things
which are allowed liitn in legitimate marriage. The solemn vow
• Cone::, of Trcnl Sol . 3\ C. ~.
OBKDIENCE IS THE GUEATEST vow. 535
of chastity renders marriage iinulid, while tlie simple vow does not
render a marriage invalid, but forbidden. That those who by these
vows l)ave dedicated themselves to God may live with more securi-
ty, the church has introduced the cloister, that they may be better
guarded from danger. Tiiey cannot go out without permission
except in stated cases. Men, even clergymen, are not allowed in the
cloisters of women, nor women within the cloisters of men,*
Considei'ing the three vows one with another, the vow of obe-
dience is the greatest. For by the vow of poverty the religious
separates himself from the external things of this world, by the vow
of chastity he despoils himself of the pleasures of the flesh given
for the preservation of the human race, but by the vow of obe-
dience he gives to God his will and the sweetness of ever doing what
he wishes: "For obedience is better than victims:" * and "The
obedient ma7i speaks victory. "'' By the vow of obedience, the re-
ligious is bound to do all his superior commands him under the I'ules
and the constitution of the religious oi'der to which he belongs.
But that there bea sin in his difobedience, he must disobey an ex-
press command given expressly, and not by way of coaxing. The
superior cannot only command these things given in the rule, but
also whatever are wanted for the good government of the house, and
therightadministrationof the affairs of the order. But no one must
obey anything ridiculous, or impossible, or do what would be a sin.
For these things are not contained in his vow of obedience, which
is an obligation not of wickedness, but of religion and of perfection.
The vow of obedience relates to the external carrying out of the
commands of the superior, while the internal virtue of obedience
relates to disposition of the mind, prepared to always obey the
Avorthy commands of this superior. Thus the religious, who, al-
though he obeys the commands of the superior, yet continually
grumbles or murmurs in his heart, has not the virtue of obedience.
Then the religious who disobeys his superior, sins first against the
commands of his chief, and against his vow. But those members
of simple religious associations who take no vows, but who disobey
their superiors do not sin against religion like regulars would, but
commit only one sin. Therefore thedisobedient religiouscomniits a
grievous sin, when he refuses to obey his superior in serious mat-
ters; wiien he openly refuses to do what he is told, or when from
his refusal scandal follows in the community. The members
should always obey from a motive of religion, seeing in the super-
ior the person of our blessed Lord, Avho is ever subject to his
Father in heaven, even to the horrors of his "passion obeying
him: "Father not my will but thine be done;" who was subject to
his mother and foster father: "And he went down to Nazareth
and he was subject to them" and who teaches us to do the will of God
as the angels and Siiints do in heaven: ■• Tliy will be done on earth
as it is in heaven."^
As the regular religious orders spread to all ])arts of the world,
1 Cpust. Clemens VIII. - I. Kings 15. 22. »Prov. £3.28. * Lord's Prayer, ,
536 RISE OF THE RELIGIOUS ORDER IN EGYPT.
the Pope himself is their superior, but he has not exempted them
from the jurisdiction of the ordinaries and bishops of the dioceses
in which they live, and the Pope being their immediate superior,
it follows that they are in a certain measure independent of the
bishops regarding the sacrament of penance for their own subjects,
Mass, censures, irregularities, their vows, and the bonds uniting
them to the community. Their superiors have an authority like
a bishop over them. They are exempt from episcopal visitation
both for themselves, their monastery, and their church. But this
does not include convents of nuns, because for them the bishop of
the diocese is the delegate of the Holy See, nor does it include
parishes ruled by members of religious orders, for the laity of these
churches belong to the bishop. But it includes the members of
the order, both the professed and those in the novitiate, for they
belong to tiie order, and they are subject to their own superiors.
Priests of a religious order, with tlie permission of their super-
iors, can absolve all members of their own order without the
faculties of the bishop. But this does not include those religious
congregations, which are not regular orders of tlie church. These
must go to the priests appointed by the bishop for that purpose.
Members of the order can absolve their own members from all
cases not reserved to the Pope, in the same way that a bishop can
absolve his own subjects, in papal cases, even from excommuni-
cation for striking a cleric. They can dispense from all secret
irregularities except for murder. They can say Mass three hours
before sunrise in their own church, and give Communion to their
own members, novices, servants and to the people, but not the Eas-
ter Communion to the laity, except when they have charge of a
parish.
In the days of the apostles, when Celsius, one of the 72 disciples
of our dear Lord, first denied his Divinity, Sts. Matthew and Mark
came preaching into Egypt, and in the fertile Nile valley, where the
pyramids still stand as the gateways of that mysterious land, where
the torrid blasts and parching sands encroach on the luxurious rich-
ness of the shores, yearly enriched by the overflowing Nile waters,
there these apostles found a naturally religious people, ready for
the Gospel. The Egyptians received the faith with gladness.
At that time God foresaw that later Arius of Alexandria would
rise up and deny the divinity of Christ, aiid Providence raised a
bulwark against that greatest enemy of Christ, Arius and his fol-
lowers. While Dccius was emperor of Rome, in 251 was born
Antony, the father of tlie monks of Egypt. Listening to the
voice of God, he sold the property left him by his parents, he gave
the i)urchase price to the poor, and following the inspiration of
the Holy Ghost, he retired into the desert, where in the vast sandy
solitude marked with the monuments of a former civilization, there
he found a home, and he dwelled the remainder of his life. The
fame of his holiness filled the church, and crowds of followers
flocked to see him and learn wisdom, and the way of salvation from
FOUNDING TfFE EARLY MONASTERIES. 637
his lips. His disciples soon made the solitudes bloom and blossom.
Wiieii later the terrible heresy of Arianism rose, teaching that
Ciirist was only a man, a creature, tlie greatest God coukl create,
the disciples of St. Antony were the upholders of the true
doctrine, that Christ is the Son of God as well as the Son of Mary,
with the double nature of God and man nnited in the one Person
of the divine Son, who ** In the beginning was the Word and the
Word was with God and tlie Word was God."' Soon religious
houses and monasteries, filled with the followers of Antony, rose
in every part of the Levant, whose members went forth preaching
Christ, and him crucified to the people of the Orient.
To guard them against attack in that epoch, they were often
built on tops of mountains, on the side of precipices, and there
we often find thetn even to our day, after having survived the re-
volutions, which have swept over these unhappy countries. These
monk-priests were often the pastors of the surrounding regions.
Each Sunday and holiday they went forth outside the gates of
their monasteries, to the chapels there to say Mass, and preach
to the people, or the people often came to the monasteries, to hear
Mass or to receive the sacraments. Tlie monks, or the lay relig-
ious, were often the most holy members of the church, while the
priest-monks were the educated and trained clergymen, who by
holy orders and by education were in rank over the other monks.
The monks, from monos, the Greek for alone, were the teachers of
the early christians. Because the priests could not attend to the
temporal affairs of the monasteries, they took into the house, to
help them in temporal matters, raligious men who never received
holy orders, but who always remained laymen, for they never in-
tended t) advance to holy orders. These were the lay-monks, or
brothers as we call them at the present time.^ As the parishes
were not at tliat time regularly established, the deserts and soli-
tudes of the East were peopled with tlie monasteries, built by the
disciples of the cultured Antony. From there they spread over
Arabia-Petra, into Palestine, wherein upon every place sanctified
by our Lord's life, or celebrated in the Old Testament there they
erected a religious house. 'JMius they crowned the heights of Sinai
where Moses received the law; a monastery rose on Horeb where
Elias lived, where he educated his disciples, called the son of the
prophet; Mount Carmel had its monastic institute for men and
women; another was built on Mount Olives from whence the Lord
ascended; even calvary itself had built upon its sides the moims-
tery, or the convent. As the brook Cedron leaves the walls of
Jerusalem and flows to the Dead Sea, in ages past it scooped for
itself a dark and dismal canon, and still it flows down deep in
the flinty mountain. Soon the sides of this rocky gorge was lined
with monasteries. The Lenten mountain, not far from the Jordan
and near the historic Jerico, hasa cave near its summit, where trad-
ition says the Lord spent his fast of forty days and forty nights. On
' John 1. 1. * Concll. Chald.
538 DRIVEN FROM THE ORIENT.
Hie very spot saiiclifioti by our Tjord's first Lent, the monks from
E,iry[)t came and built tlieii- house of prayer, and tliere even to our
day theyever ke})t tlie rigorous fast of Lent fh-st taught them by onr
Lord. Tabor also which saw his transfigui'ation soon wasiionored
by the moiuistery whose ruius attract the toui'ist of to-(hiy.
Because of ilie unsettled state of society at that time, churclies
and dioceses could not be regularly formed, the clergy could not
depend on a people continually harrassed by wars and robbers, and
the clergy were ordained for their monas/eries, to whom they
were to look for their support. That was the origin of the priest-
ly title of " the common table." The members of the religious or-
ders are ordained at present to the title of poverty. Because of
the dignity of the yiriesthood, the clergy ai'e now oidained for the
diocese, and the diocese must see that they get theii" living, or
they are ordained for the religious order to which they belong, and
the order must support them. In the early ages then, the priests
formed the presbytery of the order, and the monks and lower clergy
were the ministers of the monastery. The chief priests were the
quasi-carions, while the head of the order was called the abbot. Be- .
cause of his authority, more or less episcopal over the houses or
monastei-ies of tiie order, the abbots were like bishops. They
wore the ej)iscopal cross, the miter and the vestments of a bishop.
The word abbot, abbey, &c., come from the old Syro-Chaldaic and
means father, and in the early church it was applied to all the chief
clergymen of the church.
The monasteiios, the convents and the germs of the religious
orders then like the sun rose in the Orient, in time these religious
liouses were built in strong places, deep ravines, high mountains,
inaccessable rocks and natural strongholds were the ifavoi'ite places,
where alone the monks felt safe from the attacks of the robber
bandits of that age. That is the reason the monasteries of the East
are built on mountain tops, and why they look more like forts and
castles than houses of prayer.
When pagan Rome persecuted the church, when AriaTiism
threatened the very life of Christendom by denying the divinity of
Christ, the monks, priests, and bishops came forth from the soli-
tiides of the deserts, from the tombs of the Nile land, from the
heights of Carmel and of Ilermon, and nobly ihey defeated that
schism of irreligion and impiety. But the victory roused the de-
nrons of hell. Soon Mohammed came with his fanaticism and
errol's. ^'he monasteries were conquered and sacked, the monks
Iiut to death, Egypt, Palestine, Arabia. Syria, Turkey and the
^]ast became Mohammedan. Now the oft met ruins of these great
religious establishments tell the traveller of the once flourishing'
ftate of the church in these cradle laiuls of the faith. 'J'hc CJreek
m'in<l was sharp and penetrating, the IJomans were rulers and
statesmen, but the Oriental tendency Avas tow.-irds effemimuiy aiid
lilziness. In the unfortunate East, in ])lace of the self-denial of the
monks you now find the niimerous wives of the 'J'urk. 'J'he stag-
RELTGIOrS OR DEES TX ROME. 589"
nation of the Al Coran that most abominable book lias paralyzed all
eTiterpi'ise, and in place of the charity of the early religions, you
find an unbending fanaticism and a hatred of the christian )ianie.
With fire and sword the followers of Mohammed swept over the
ci'adle lands of the faith, and in a generation religion was swept
f)-om the hearts of the people, where once it had so flourished.
The monastic institutions then looked to the Father of the faith-
ful for protection. They fled to the Roman Pontiff for safety.
The religious honses then began to floui-ish moi-e than ever at
Rome. The Roman nobility soon imitated the wonders of the
monasteries of Egypt, of Thebs, of Sinai and of the Levant. The
senatorial families, whom Phyrrus compared to kings gave their
sons, their daughters and their property to the church for the es-
tablishment of religious houses in the eternal city. The children
of the Scipions, of the Marcellus, of the Gamillus, of the Anicius,
and the ])atricians became the holiest members of the religious
orders. The Roman morals during pagan Rome had fallen so low,
that the weight of a silk dress was a burden to a Roman lady, hosts
of servants waited on them, they even killed for a mistake
or in a fit of anger, chastity humility and christian virtues were
nnknown, the rich were corrupt, impure, haughty, overbearing.
No woman's virtue was safe ; no property was secure; human life
Avas ever in danger; men were ruled only by their passions, and
neither faith nor morals were known to the unconverted pagan
Romans, rotten Avith the vices of the abomiiuitions of dying pagan-
ism, whenhosts of monks, driven by revolutions from the East, came
to Rome to claim the protection of the Father of the faithful. From
the vei-y days of the great apostles Sts. Peter and Paul, the relig-
ions life had existed at Rome in the way described before. But
Avhen the monasteries of the East were pillaged by the infidels,
the persecuted religious in great numbers came to the West. To
Europe they brought their regular lives, their studies of the Scrip-
tures, their fasts and prayers, their saintly coi'versations. In a
Avord, driven from the scenes of our Saviour's life and death, fi'om
the places hallowed by the giving of the law to Moses, from the
]5iblical scenes so holy, and from the East they flocked to
Europe, and that favored region profited by the convulsions of the
Levant. Thusit always comes to pass, that the church, persecuted
in one place profits by the redoubled effoi'ts of the persecuted in
some more favored region, Avorking for the greater glory of the
Lord, for all things worketh for the good of those Avho love God.
The monks, strengthened by the solitudes of the A'ast deserts of
the East, could not find such desert regions in the West. A reform
was wanted. St. Antony tells us that the mission of reforming-
the monastic orders Avas first offered by God in a vision to a solitary of
the desert, Avho refused to underrake the great Avork. Sts.
Chrystom and Bazel lived as monks from their ordination till the
latter was called to the episcopal office, and Ave read hoAV on«-
reproached the other for leaA'ing him a priest, and ascending to
540 SPIRITUAL SOXS OF ST. ANTONY.
episcopacy Hie culminating point of the priestly ordere, when
botli had promised each other to remain simple priests. St. Jerome
lived as a monk for years in the desert, till called by St. Damasus
to become his private secretary, and to reform the Bible. He was
a monk in the highest terms. Amid the splendors of the papal
court, he kept the rules of the monastic house he founded at the
grotto where our Lord was born at Bethlehem. All the great bish-
ops and priests of the early church were monks, and the clergy lived
severe lives from the times of the apostles. Let us see first those
religious who follow the rule of St. Antony.
In tracing the origin of the religious order, we must go back to
the days of the kin^s of Juda. We read that the prophet Elias
founded a school of prophets, and often in the holy Scriptures we
find mention of these schools of the " sons of the prophets. '' This
school of the prophets was founded on Mount Oarmel, and existed
in the days of our Lord. They were monks of the old Law. But
they had not regular rules to guide them. Their daily lives were
spent in the studies of the Scriptures. When the apostles came to
preach Jesus crucified, they embraced the christian religion.
When the rules of St. Antony had spread into Syria, when
they saw the wise religious of St. Bazel, the monks of Carmel
adopted them, and from that time they have followed these rules
of St. Antony. In our day they are known as the Carmelites,
from Mount Carmel, where Elias dwelled before he was taken up
into heaven on a fiery chariot of the Lord of Hosts. ' They
form the oldest order in the church. In 1209 St. Albert, the
Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, gave them a modified rule. When
Syria was finally conquered by the Mohammedans, they spread all
over Europe. In 1259 St. Louis king of France enriched them
with many gifts, and gave them a convent at Paris. In 1287
they began to wear the scapular of Mount Carmel, which they
say was given to the Blessed Simon Stok. From that dates the
foundation of the Confraternity of the Scapular.
The regular Canons of St. Victor follow the rules of Sts. Antony
and Bazel. They wear a white robe of serge and the rochet,
with a surplice over it, and a white cloak in winter.
Under the rules of St. Augustin come the regular canons of the
Premonstrates, founded by St. Norbert under king Louis the Big.
In choir they wear the surplice, the white amice and the purple
mantle.
In the middle ages, the Turks threatened all Europe, and the
christians ever looked to their Father the Pope for protection
against the infidels, till they were defeated by the combined
christian troops under Don Joan at Lepanto. At that time the
inhabitants of southern Europe, as well as captured soldiers were
sold into slavery. Thousands of christian slaves lost their lives
on the burning sands of Africa, or spent their miserable days of
the most abject slavery, amidst the hardships of the Moham-
IV. Kings U.
ST. AUGUSTIN A FATHER OF MONKS. "541
medans. In 1198 Sts. John of Matliaand Felix of Valois fonntled
the Older of tlie Trinitarians. The object was the redemption of
these unfortnaate christians, held captive by the Saracans.
Three-quarters of the revenues of each religious house was to be
spent in buying these christian slaves. Many of the religious men
voluntarily gave themselves in place of the captives, and for their
love of their neighbor in danger of losing their faith for their de-
livery, they spent their lives in slavery, while the man they rescued
returned home to Europe. They lived entirely on vegetable food
except on Sundays and great feasts, when they ate a little meat.
A branch of them was reformed by Father Jerome Halies. They
are called The Barefooted Trinitarians.
In 1624 Father St. Charles Faure founded tlie Congregation of
France, Avhich soon became so numerous that they had 100 houses.
They took charge of parishes, opened hospitals for the cure of all
kinds of diseases, gathered the children into Sunday schools,
sang the divine office, and turned themselves to all kinds of
christian works.
When the great St. Augustin became bishop of Hippo, in the
North of Africa, he formed the clergy of his cathedral into a re-
ligious order; for thirty years he lived among them as their su-
perior, studying and writi'ig, and he gave the church these great
books, which have since illumined the whole christian world.
The order w-hich he founded still flourishes, and they are known
as the Augustinians. To that order once belonged the unfortunate
Luther, father of the modern religious revolt called the reforma-
tion. Numerous religious orders came from the order organized
by the great bishop of Hippo, and they soon spread intoevei-ypart
ofthe church. In 1254 Pope Alexander IV. reformed them and
iinited them again into one order. At the present Avriting the
Eeligious Hermits, the Congregation of France, the Dominicans,
the Order of Mercy, the Servites of Mary, the Celotes, the Thea-
tines, the Barnabites, the Brothers of Charity, &c., follow the rules
of St. Augustin.
But the church, ever fruitful in the variety of her children, soon
saw rise another code of laws for the guidance of her chosen
children called to the counsels of our Lord. At Eome in 480 was
born of noble parents Benedict, who frightened at the licentious
conduct of his companions at school, fled to desert mountains of
Subiaco, 30 miles from the eternal cit}^ where for three years he
lived in union with God separated from men. He was elected by the
monks of a neighboring monastery to be their abbot, but they
could not agree, and he left them and went back to his solitude. In
a few years he established twelve monasteries. The clergy and the
nobility of Rome flocked to see him, went to see an other St. John
the Baptist in the wilderness. In 529 he founded the great abbey
of Casino on a high mount, on the ruins of a pagan temple, where
np to that time the neighboring pagans offered sacrifices to the
false gods. From the pen of Gregory the Great, we learn most of
542 THE CHILDREN OF ST, BENEDICT.
the imformation we have of the third great father of the religions
life. P'illed with the science of the Saints, he composed a rule of
life, Mhich was to regnlate all the monasteries he founded. St.
Gregoi-y the Great says it is the best rule for religious, as it is
founded on silence and self -denial, solitude, prayer, humility and
obedience.
That rule of St. Benedict soon spread to all the monasteries of
Europe, and nearly all the religious houses of the middle ages
adopted it as their guide. For that reason he is called in history
the Patriarch of the Monks of the West. When in 895 the cele-
brated and historic Cluney was founded, the monks of that great
historic house adopted the rule of St, Benedict. So did St. Paul
Justinian in 1520, when he established the Camaldulesof France.
AVhen St. Kobert laid the foundations of the famous abbey of Ci-
teaux, which 100 years afterwards counted 180i> monasteries,
daughters of the fruitful parent, when they laid its foundations
amidst the mountains, they were regulated by the wise rule of St.
Benedict. In 1586 the order of Citeaux was reformed by Dominic
and his disciples. In 1140, under the same rules were founded
the Trappists, so called from their first house of la Trappe.
It is the severest order in the church. Reformed in 1602 from
its primeval rigors by John le Boutillier, to this day it frightens
the people of the world with the awful severity of its members.
Under Godfrey de Bullion in the days of chivalry, the crusaders and
the christians saw the holy land the prey of the Saracens, and they
flocked in crowds to rescue the places hallowed by the footprints
of our Lord from the desecrating hands of infidels. For that pur-
pose in 11 18, Ungues of Paganes and Godfrey of S. Amour, founded
the order of the Templars into a holy society for the defence of the
pilgrimson their way to Jerusalem the holy land. After giving great
assistance to religion, at last they left their first fervor, they became
proud ; they were condemned by the kings of France, of Spain, of
Portugal, of England. In 1311 they weYe formally suppressed by the
church. The religious of Fontevrault followed Benedict's rule,
when they became lax in their lives they were reformed by Mary
of Britagne. Tiiat was towards the end of the XV. century. The
religious of the Congregation of St. Maur were perhaps the most
illustrious of the family of St. Benedict during the middle ages.
They had colleges in various parts of Europe for the education of
the young.
We now come to the religious families, who follow the last of
the four great founders of religious orders St. Francis of Assissium.
The human race had advanced since the order of St. Benedict was
established nearly eight centuries before, and the Spirit of God
brooding over the church had raised up apostolic men to meet the
changing conditions of society. The old religious orders had seem-
ed to have done their work, and new life and new materials were
wanted to meet the new conditions of society. God raised up an-
other leader in Isi-ael. In the little city of Assissium, on the brow
THE WORK OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISSIL'M. 54^
of the hill of Assi, in 1182 was born St. Francis, one of the last
great fathers of the religions life of poverty. By tiie rapacity of
rulers, by the ignorance of the people, by the vices of the rich, and
by the indifference of the laity the church of God was shaken to
its very foundations. God called the poor P^'rancis to re-
pair his house. He supposed the Lord meant the church of St.
Damian outside the walls of Assissium. But God meant his church
universal, of which the material building is but the image and the
figure. He lived the most austere life. He gave his goods, even
his clothes to the poor. He gathered a little band of disciples
around him, then he laid the foundations of the great Franciscan
order at Portiuncula, Italy, on the 16th of August, 12U9. The same
year he received the approval of Innocent IV. He composed a
rule for the guidance of the members, which was chiefly formed
of the counsels of the Gospel, to which he added certain regulations
of human prudence. In a vision at niglit God gave to the great
Pope Innocent III. a prophecy of what the order was to be in the
universal church. The Pope saw Fi'ancis upholding the Lateran
Church, the Pope's Cathedral, the Mistress the Mother of all the
churches of world and the Cathedral of thelioman diocese. Five
years after he saw another vision, in which St. Dominic sustained
the same church when it was tottering to the ground. Thus did
God enlighten the mind of the Pope regarding the future mighty
works of the followers of these two great fathers of the religious
life.
When this order of St. Francis was approved by the supreme
head of the church, with his twelve disciples he began to preach
penance. Numerous holy men joined his order, and soon they
spread all over the cliristian world. Numerous dioceses, cities,
and nations asked his disciples to found houses of the new order,
that they might be animated by the examples of the heroic virtues
of his disciples. In 1212 he gave his habit and his rules to St.
Clare, Avho under his direction founded the second order of St. Fran-
cis for the sanctification of the holy virgins. Till his death he
took personal charge of the house she founded at the monastery
of St. Damian in Assissium. That Avas the mother and model
house of the great congregations of Franciscan nuns and sisters,
Avhich at this writing are doing good in almost every diocese of
the Avorld.
Towards the end of his life he was once in prayer on the mountain,
on the feast of the Exultation of the Holy Cross. He saw coming
down from heaven the Saviour himself as a Seraph nailed to the
cross. He had six wings of fire, two covered his body, two
stretched above his head, and with the other two he flew from the
heights of heaven to the man of God, whose heart so burned with
the fire of charity that he nearly died. The crucified Lord
fixed npon him the most tender eye of love, showing him that he
was not to die a martyr by the sufferings of the flesh, but by the
inward anofuish of the soul. From each of the wounds of the
544 BRANCHED OF THE FRANCISCANS.
Crucified, came rays of piercing light to the hands and feet and
side of the saintly Francis. From that moment till his death, his
feet and hands, as Avell us his side, bore the murks of tlie wounds
or stigmata, as though he had been crucified. The nails with
black heads made of living flesh penetrated through his hunds
and feet, while the points pierced the other side and were clinched
into his palms, and into the soles of his feet. In his side was
left an open wound which frequently bled. He died in the year 1226.
The Franciscans founded by St. Francis has undergone many
changes and reformations, according to the wants of the church
and the changed condition of society.
In 1368 Father Paulet founded a branch of them called the
Cordeliers, to whom Pope Leo X. gave precedence over the other
disciples of the saint. In Spain, about the year 1484, John of
Guudelouj)e organized the Ricolets, wlio in 155J5 came to France.
Matthew of Bassi and Louis of Fossembrun established the
Capuchins, so called from the crown or hood of their habit. They
were a branch of the minor Brothers of the Franciscans. The
order produced numerous distinguished persons.
In 1250 Pope Innocent IV. gave the name of Minor Conventuals
to all the Franciscans, who live a community life. But in 1517
Pope Leo X. restricted the name to the Franciscan monks, who
persisted in living a less rigorous life, while the other reformed
monaiiteries of St. Francis were named Observants.
After founding his first order for men and his second for
women under St. Clare, he organized a Third order for the laity,
who were impeded from entering the religious state, yet partake
in all the benefits of the religious. That order composed of both
feexes, became very extensive. Some of thtm actuated by piety,
wanted to form it into a community and have the members take
TOWS, but it was impracticable. They were named the Peneten-
tiaries of the Third Order of St. Francis. In 1287 it was estab-
lished in France. In 1594 Father Mousart reformed it. From
the name of the first house in Paris it was called Picpus, so
graphically described by Victor Hugo. Some of them wore the
mantle, and these were called the Religious of the Third Order
of St, Francis.
Tiie order of Chartreuse was thus named from the house where
St. Bruno first founded them in the year 1086, of which we
will treat more freely at another time. Tiie rule is very severe.
The order gave many celebrated saints to the church, and it ex-
erted the most powerful influence on the whole civilized world
during the middle ages.
In 1435 St. Francis of Paul founded the Minims. According
to their rule they never eat meat or any product of the animal
kingdom.
When the nations of the north of Europe, following the revolt
of Luther, rebelled against the church, the Holy Ghost raised up
another man to combat his teachings. He was St. Ignatius of
THE JESUITS, ORATORIANS, &C. 545
Loyola, the founder of the Jesuits. His conversion by reading
the lives of the Saints, when M'ounded in the hospital, his retreat
at Manresa, his calling of his disciples, the wonderful conversion
of his disciple, St. Francis Xavier, their voyages and discoveries
in North and South America, their great success as teachers of the
young, are facts of history. The reformation had thrown into the
church and into society the element of rebellion and of revolt against
all authority. To counteract it, the Jesuits muke a special vow of
obedience to the head of the church and to their own superiors.
Up to that time the mind of men in the church had tended to the
castigation of the body and to the severity of tlie middle ages.
These corporal austerities did not take with a people looking for
the ease and the luxury of wealth, revelling in the pleasures of life.
Tlie founder of the Jesuits above all taught the denial of the will,
the crucifixion of the intellect. They were suppressed by Pope
Clement XIV. in 1773, because of the pressure brought to bear on
him by the lying enemies of the Jesuits. They Avere restored by Pope
Pius VII. in 1814. To this day they continue their religious
work. The wi'iter knows of what he writes, for he spent the
greater parts of the years 1869 and 1870 as professor in a College
i;nder the Jesuits, und he knows them from his own observation,
because he has seen the daily lives of the Jesuits, and knows the
objects of the order.
13esides the illustrious orders mentioned before, we find in the
church many congregations founded for some particular work.
They usually follow wholly or in part the rules of religious orders.
There is not a weakness or disease of human nature but what the
Holy Ghost has established a remedy, by raising up great men
to combat it by the religious order or congregation they es-
tablished.
In 1611 Cardinal Berulle founded the Oratorians of Jesus, for
the management of colleges and seminaries for the education of
the clergy. Its chief house was at Paris.
In 163'^ St. Vincent of Paul organized the congregation of the
Mission, or as they are better known the Lazarists, so called from
their first house in Paris. Their chief object is to give missions
in parishes and to revive the faith of the weak. But they also
take charge of colleges for the education of the young.
The Christian Brothei's, who take charge of schools were or-
ganized by Blessed John Baptist de la Salle, who made his studies
with the Sulpicians. He found much opposition and many per-
secutions before he could succeed. The death of one of his disci-
ples showed him that they were not to be ordained a priest. They
are a band of school teachers devoting their whole lives to that
laudable object.
-In Italy, France, Spain, &c., we find congregations of religious
men who devote their whole time to the unfortunate persons con-
demned to death for capital crimes. These good men look after
the temporal and spiritual interests of these unhappy prisoners
546 IHE END OF THE BOOK.
before their execution and see tliat they are decently buried after
tlieir death.
The Chivaliers of St. John of Malta were organized in 1099 in
order to defend Christendom against the attacks of the Moham-
medans. In 1310 they captured Rhodes from the followers of the
false prophet, and that city became the seat of the order, half
religious and half military, till 1530 Avhen Charles V . gave them the
Island of Malta — hence their name. The order was divided into
three classes— the 6rst being chevaliers belonging to the nobility —
the second were priests or chaplains and the third rank were soldiers.
Since 1798 they have existed without leading a community life.
In 1802 the Island of Malta was annexed to England.
Thus far have we written of the church of God and of her di-
vine constitution as founded by our Lord to teach, sanctify and
save the members of his race which he came down to lead up into
the society and companionship of his Father and his Holy Spirit.
Now our work is done, but not complete. For we have only
given the principles wiiich require better and more complete ex-
planations, before the reader can see and appreciate the full
beauties of the Bride of the Ljimb. When we have rested from
the three years of labor spent in the writing of this book, in
another work, we may again take up our pen to continue our la-
bors for the glory of God for the instruction of the laity.
u
^';^.
^^».
ii^
Abbot, tlio, 529.
'Ablegate, a iiapal. 73, 298.
Absence irom cinircli, 383.
Acolyte, duties of, 63, 64.
Act, of orders juiisdiciioii, 63.
Act, a human, 185.
Adam, creation of. 267.
Adam's sin. 19, 46, empire, 18, 19.
Administrator of diocese, 501, qnalilies
of. 501.
Adrian I.. 259.
Advent, Lent, &c . when ordered, 213,
JElia., ancient name of Jerusalem, 316,
318.
Aerius, liis errors, 506.
Africa, bishops of, held a council, 225.
Agapitus, Pope, 236.
Agatho, Pope, 249.
Agent, nature of, 71, 92, 140, 144.
Agnosticism in ancient times, 213.
Alcuin, teacher of Cliarlemagne, 262.
Alexander, St., 212, 305.
All Saints, orinrin of the feast, 242, cele-
brated in France, 264.
Altar boys, 385, bisliops portable, 464.
Anacletus, St., 212, 214.
Anastasius, St.. 225, 231.
Andrew the apostle. 125, 126.
Angels, the fall of the. 16.
Angels, wliy they Avere not redeemed, 17.
Antioch, seat of an arclibi.shop, 305.
Antiquity of, 316, councils on, 318,
cliarcrcs against, 318,
Antony, S,., founded a religious order,
537, 539.
Apostles, powers of the, 435, 436.
Approbation required for confession, 471.
647
lM
«lfr-»w
»
548
INDEX.
Apollonarians, errors of, 223, 224.
Apostle, meaning of the wortl, 125.
Apocryphal Books, tlic, 189.
Apostolic church, the, 122, delesrates,
330.
Apostolic See, the, 146.
Apostles, tiieir communion, 47.
Apostles, tiieir works. 328, 329, 331, of
tlie christian nations. 329.
Appeals, 308, 309, 318.
Archbishops, 301, 322, consecration of,
340, 341, antiquity of, 505, 506,
consecrated the bishop, 409, l>y the
Pope. 418, 419.
Archbishop, 321, 322, duties of, 322,
a braucii of Peter. 333, election of, in
earlv churcli, 410, 411.
Archbishopric, tlie first, 150.
Archdeacon, 486, 487, abuse of, 487.
Archdiocese, clergy of, 309, 310, 312,
antiquity of, 316.
Architecture, clnirch origin of, 404.
Archpriest, 482, 485, two kuids of, 485,
on ceremonies, 490, 491, in early
church, 585, 505.
Aries, arclibisliop ot, 312.
Arius, liis errors. 213, 219, spread, 222,
410.
Arian bishops condemned, 222, 238.
Assistant priests, 383, 475, 516.
Athanasius of Alexandria lal.sely ac-
cnsc'd. 222.
Athens, the city of, 270.
Attila, tiio scourge of (Jod, 229, met by
I'()))e St. Lei>, 229.
Augustine, St., to the Pope, 227.
Augustinians, origin of tlie. 540, 541.
Bad books, a list of published, 294.
Baltimore, tlie first 8ec, 315.
Banns i>f marriage. 517.
Baptism, 44, received only once, 230.
Baptismal font. 5T6.
Baptist church, the, 102.
Barbarians, destruction caused bj*, 370.
Bartholomew^, St., 127,
Belisarius, invaded tiic Pope's dotninioua,
23-
Benedictines, origin of the, 541, spread
of tiieir rule. 542.
Benedict I. Pope, 239.
Benedict 11.. Pupc. 251.
Benefices, 380.
Bible, when proclaimed inspired, 189,
wiiat is in the, 106, 231, 331, 394,
j)roiioimced inspired by the Po[>e. 231.
Bishop, lu Part Iidulel, 74, meaning of
the word. 432, 439, when liis power
bt;gins, 75, 429, equal in lioly orders,
131, 333, preacliing. 212, election of,
232, 405 — 428, crimiiiul charges
against, 318, dignity of, 333, 394,
395, 434, relations with his diocese,
,429—455, tlie Head of bishops, 333,
441, wiio appoints them. 338, 242, con-
secratuiga, 339, 340, of Rome, tlie line
of tlie, 388, power of tlie, 394, 395,
436, 439, as head of the diocese.
429 — 457, origin of his jiower, 431,
432, names of in the early churcli,
432, errors of Aerius resrarding the,
432, 433, lines of the first. 433, only
can ordain priests, 434, 435, of Rome,
only successor of the Apostles, 436,
restricted by the law, 437, origin of
the b's jurisdiction, 437, governs his
diocese in his own name, 440, teach-
ing, sanctifying and governing, 450,
451, 452, pontificating, 451, 452, ob-
ligations and duties of the, 457-476,
how pastor of the dioceso in lato sen-
8u, 458, must consult the chapter,
492—497, legislative powers of the,
459, his powers limited, 460, over
students, 498, by whom admonished,
498, when removed from See, 500,
nomination of. in U. S.. 501, 502,
once pastor of the whole diocese, 504.
Body of Christ, the mystic. 70, 141, the
glorified. 38.
Boniface, St., sent to convert Germany,
254, consulls the Poix;. 257.
Born, wlien the church was. 13, 22.
Born, Christ b. three times. 36.
Bread and wine at Mass regulated,
213.
Breviary in early church, 365, 452.
Brothers in monasteries, 530.
Bull, a Papal letter, why so-Ciiiled, 297.
Byzantium becomes Constaniinopic 220,
241.
Caius, St.. 217.
Calixtus, St., 215.
Candidate for parish, 514.
Candidates for the episcopacy, 427, ex-
alliiiiiitiou of. 427.
Canoniz. tion of saints, 294, 326, 355.
Canosa, meaning of going to, 376.
Canon law, origin of the, 318, 378, 401,
402.
Canons, of the Cathedral, 477—502.
Cardinal, meaning of the word. 270.
Cardinals, duties of the. 270—288, an-
ti([ui y of the, 271, 217, three rank.s
ol. 272, bishops. 276, 273, de.icons,
272, 273, priests, 273, 276, how
elected, 275, 276, selected from all
nations, 276, candidates for, 276, re-
ception of. 275, antiquity of, 291.
Carmelites, origin of the. 540.
Catechumens in the early church, 367.
INDEX.
540
Cathedral, why so-called, 74, rektion of
i^ishop to the, 458, an imago of llie
diocese. 404, 451.
Cathedrals ot England, 376, 377.
Catholic, iiieanitifrof lliewoid. iliechiircli
is Caliiollc. 119, 121, 122, tlio llo-
miiii Catholic cluircli, 119, origin of
tlie Catholic church. 15, 20, iiiHiience
cf, 15, what is the, 16, clergymen be-
long fh'st to, 65.
Catholic king on ceremonies at Rome,
277.
Celestine, Pope.
Cemetery, laws relating to, 519.
Cerdo, his errors, 214.
Cerinthus, errors of, 125.
Cesarea, archhishop of at Nice. 335.
Change of pastors. 211, 212.
Chancery, ilie Roman, 256.
Chancel cJioir. 491, 500.
Chapters of the cathedrals, 366, before
the reformation, 380, during a va-
cancy, 500.
Chaplains in the army. 257.
Chapel, private origin of tiio, 377, bish-
op's power regarding, 464, 465.
Chapter houses, 492.
Chapter electing their bishop, 412, 426,
of Canterbury and the bishop. 412,
414, oKgin of the word, 483, of
France, 414, history of the, 477 —
502, founded by the apostles, 477,
479, of twelve priests and seven dea-
cons, 479, the senate of the diocese,
480, 482, 383, 384, 492, 498, 506,
Rome had a double ciiapler. 480, in
difficulties. 383, asked to resign. 384,
a corporate body, 384, 385, 496, 497,
otficials of, 488, 489, iirst of Lincoln,
489, 490, Montreal, 490, on holv
week, 491, 499, support of, 492, how
thc\' vote, 492, 493, relation of bish-
op to, 493, 495, 497, place of meet-
ing, 493, chairman of. 493, matters
treated by, 494, 496, duties of, 4Q4,
495, 497, its bishop head of the, 490,
\gy, acts of must be signed by the
isiiop, 497, dress of members of,
499, during vacancy, 500, 514, must
appoint an administrator. 500, 501,
two administrators forbidden. 500,
501.
Charlemagne, 259, 261, 262, crowned
at Rome, 261, 262.
Chartreuse, founding of the, 544.
Chamberlain, at death of Pope. 280.
Charity of the early christians, 365, 366.
Charity, the virtue of, 187, 188.
Chastity, the virtue of, 524, 525, 526.
Christian Brothers, founding of the, 545.
Children of Catholics must be baptized.
226,
Christ and the church one, 16, 20, 43,
62, 103, 104, preligiucd in the old
law, 6l, a king, 79, 84.
Chrism, holy, how blessed, 220.
Church, the, a copy of the Trinit}', 23,
how united with the Trinity, 30, 43,
outside of no salvation. 35, 40, 52,
obedient to Christ, 43, tlie spouse of
Christ, 68, 70, 77, 79, teaching, sanc-
tifying and ruling. 82, the city of God.
50.
Church, the congregational, 102.
Citeaux, founding of. 542.
Cited, before civil courts, clergy exempt
from, 23.
City of God, the. 50.
Clandestinity, laws aboiit. 517.
Clement, St.. 216, Kpistie ot to the Corin-
thians, 212, 214.
Clergy, support of the, 469, 470, 473,
474, 475, education, 469, me.ining of
ti;e word, 529, cited before church
courts, 223, reform of, 224, 381, regu-
lar and secular, 381.
Clerk of the .senate of cardinals, 280.
Cletus, St., 211.
Clovis, the emperor, 247.
Coadjutor, when ai)[)ointed, 300.
Communion, 47, 214, meaning of, ineany
church, 55.
Communion meant jurisdiction, 341,
342.
Confession in the early church, 366,
420, 421, annual. 474.
Constantine, I'ope, 254, tlie emperor,
220, liealed from leprosy. 219.
Constantinople, councils of, 173, 174,
Roman empire changed to, 173, when
taken by the Mohannnedans, 202, VJ.
council of. 250, refused the first place
after Rome, 422.
Confirmation of bishops. 424, 426,
foim of, 427, sacrament of, 470.
Confirmation, ordinary minister of.
435-
Congregation of extraordinary church
matters, 296, of indulgences, 296, of
immunity. 296, of France, S^I.
Congregations, the Roman, 289-300, of
• bishops. 295.
Congregation, of Regulars, 294.
Consecration of bishops, 405—428, by
the Pope, 421.
Consistory, what is a, 222.
Council, who calls a, 323, 350, of the
Father, 346, nature of a, 346-361,
in the earlj' church, 348, ecumenical,
an, 350, 360, chairman of a, 351,
550
INDEX.
members of a, 352, confirmation, 353
-354, the most iii)f>ort;int. 354, p-irtic-
"''i'-, 355, 356, of Africa. 358, 359, of
France and Spain, 359, visiting bish-
ops in a, 360, provincial, 360.
Conclave for eleciion of a Pope, 281,
288.
Consecration of bishop by three bishops,
212, of a chi rch by a bisiiop, 230.
Constitution, wliat is n, 83, 151.
Constitution of tiie United States, 47.
Consultors, house of, 293.
Conversion of Protestants, 384.
Copts, sciiism of the, 353.
Cornelius, St.. 216.
Counties in Ireland, origin of, 377.
Councils of Baltimore, 361.
Council of the Father, Christ the, 31, of
the church, 153.
Courts, in the early chnrch, 367.
Court, the snpreine 154, 129, to 289.
Courts, civil foundation of, 374.
Creation of the angels, 16, of Man, i6,
267, 269.
Custom, how it makes law, 325, 459.
Damasus, St.. 223.
Datary, the Roman, 297.
Dating the years from birth of Christ,
236.
Deacons, esUiblished by the Apostles,
272, office of, 63, appointed in Home,
216, 272, stole, how worn, 226, dia-
dem worn by St. John, 364.
Deans, among the bishops, 335, 357,
358, 359, origin of the word, 486.
Death, the cause of, 34, Christ delivered
ns from, 34, why Christ siilTcred. 34,
35, had no dominion over Christ, 36,
disciples, the, 72, 505, 506.
Delegate, a papal, 73, 74, 424.
Delegates, of Christ, 70.
Dennis, St., 216, falsely accused, 2l6.
Destruction of literature and arts, 229.
Diocese, how born, 49, 54, 56, s|X)use of
the bisiiop. 68, why some fall, 135,
why the Roman ever stands, 135,
history of the, 362, 387, head of the,
367, 389, diocese of Rome, 388-404,
only immortal, 388, 389, .some fell
away, 388, 389, founded on the Apos-
tles, 389, the spouse of Christ, 389,
ruled by a bishop, 438, authority of
Pope in, 440, constitution of the, 453.
Diptychs in the early church, 433.
Diptychs, the, 149.
Discipline, nature of, 348.
Dispensation, nature of a, 460, 461,
reasons for giving, 461, what bishops
can do regarding, 461, 466, for relig-
ious to marry, 333.
Disputes about a diocese, 218.
Division, of churches, effect of, 104, ol
the parishes of Rome, 217.
Domnus, Pope. 249.
Donatists, their errors, 218, 225.
Dualists, errors of, 213.
Easter, cele!>nition of 156,214.
Ebion, errors of, 125, 196.
Election of a Pope, 277-288.
Election of bishops in tiic U. S., 335,
early church. 405, 429, by the apos-
tles, 407, 426, St. Cyprian on, 407,
425, early look pnvt in tiio. 407, 425,
in Africa, Kgypt, Ac. 408, 409, 419,
mode of procedure, 409, 428, inter-
ference of government in, 409, 410,
4-26, patriarchs in 415, 416, contirm-
ation of the Po|k\ 416, 417, 418,
illegally declared invalid, 420, abuses
at, 425, 426, of bishop of Rome,
^, 367-388, 341, 347.
Elements, the divine and human in the
church. 142.
Eleutherius, St.. 215.
Ember days, 215.
Emperor, on ceremonies at Rome, 280.
Empire, what i.s an. 192.
English church looks lo Rome, 257.
England, conversion of, 29, 248.
English college at Rome, 261, apjK^ils to
Rome, 243.
Ephesus, councils of. 55, 228, confirmed
by the Pope. 228.
Episcopate, nature of the, 429, 456,
fulness of the priesthood, 439, is it a
saciameiii, 439, 440.
Episcopal cliurcii, the, 102.
Episcopacy, the, 55.
Espousal of tho bishop with Ibe diocese,
56.
Espousal of Christ with tho church, 15,
56, 269.
Essence in Gml, 64.
Eugenius, Pope, 248.
1. • 264.
Eulalius, schism of, 227.
Eunomians, the, 223.
Eunomians, errors of, 223.
Eutyches, errors of, 171, 231, 234.
Evangelists, figures of, 125.
Evaristus, St., 212.
Eve, crciition of, 16, 20, 267.
Evodius, Si., 155, archbishop of Antioch,
305.
Examination of candidate for bishop,
409.
Excommunication, 507, 517.
Exemption of clergy from civil courts,
463.
Exorcist, office of, 63.
INDEX.
551
Extraordinary confessor for nuns, 472.
Extreme Unciioii, 518.
Faculties of the diocese, 471, 517, for
rums, 472.
Faith, nature of supernatural, 186, 187.
Faith and morals, liie teachers of, 179.
Fall of the angels, 16.
Fall of man, 17.
Fasting, on Sunday and Thursday for-
bidden, 218, dispensations from, 462.
Father of the Apostles, Christ the, 44.
Fatherly authoritj^, 22.
Felix, St., 217.
Felix III., 230.
Felix IV., 233.
Feudalism and the church, 374, 375.
" Filioque," disputes about tlie, 262.
Franciscans, origin of the, 542, 543,
^ 544-
Freedom of worship, 218.
Fruits of tlic earth blessed, 217.
Funerals regulated by the Pastor, 519, of
the poor, 519.
Garments, clerical, 475.
Gelasius, St., 217.
Generation of men, 19.
in God, 62, 99, 100.
Gentiles, calling of the, 61.
Gifts of tlie people, 215.
Godfrey de Bullion, 380.
Gospel, u liy we stand at the, 226, 232.
" Gloria " when added to the Mass, 213.
Grace of the Aposiles, 328.
Grace, foundation of, 18, 32, 35, 45,
grace given by the S<icraments, 44, 45.
Greeks, the schismatic, 202.
Gregory the Great, 239, 241.
Gregory I., 240, 241.
11 , 254.
Gregory YII. and Henrj'^ IV'. of Ger-
many, 41 1, of England, 412.
Head of the church, Christ the, 39, 41,
49, 72, lOi, 113, of the whole race,
Christ the, 39, God the head of Christ,
41, of tlie Roman diocese, 392, of the
diocese, 393.
" Health,"' and apostolic Benediction when
lirst used, 211.
Helena, St., 219.
Hell, separation from God, 34.
Hermas, his book, The Pastor, 156.
Hierarchy of the Trinity, 99, tlie five, 24,
25, 46, 53, 54, of orders and of juris-
diction, 71.
Hilary, St., 229.
Hincmar, 265.
Holiness, meaning of, 87, 117.
Holy office, congregation of, 293.
Holy Ghost, how he speaks to the world,
52, 78, 154, how sent to man, 53,
54, 57, 116, the Soul of the church,
55, 56, 114, 115, 116, 183, errors
relating to, 244, 259, 262.
Holy orders lasting, 336.
Home government, 391, 392, 440, 454.
Honorius, Pope, 243.
Hope, the virtue of, 187.
Hormisdas, St., 232.
House of Peter, antiquity of, 289, 291,
compared to Kings, 291.
Hyginus, St , 214.
Ignatius, St., 68, 155, 156. Driven
from Constantinople, 342.
Illyricum, ancient, 224.
Image of the Trinity the church an, 15,
57.
Image breakers the 173, 256, 260, 265,
259.
Images, worship of 255, 259, 264, 260.
Imposition of hands of priests. 435.
Incarnation, the wonders of the 18, 26,
29, 46.
Incense in the services 214.
Index, congregation of the 293, 295.
Indulgences, nature of 474.
Infallible, 84, 86, 108, 189, 144, 154,
180, 181, 182.
Infallibility, meaning ot the word, 181.
Innocent I., St., 226.
Interpretation of the Bible private, 181.
Interpreter of the Bible, the, 181, 186.
Ireland the school house of Europe, 370.
Irene the empress, 260.
James the Apostle, 126, The Less, 126.
Jansenists, errors of the, 507.
Jerome, St., works of, 224.
Jerusalem, council of, 167, destruction
of, 213, 214, when destroyed, 245,
rebuilt by Adrian, 213, why Peter
left, 304, bishop of at Nice, 335.
Jesuits, founding of the, 385, 545.
John, meaning of the name, 124.
John, St., as an archbishop, 125.
John, St., the Evangelist, 124, 125, Pope,
233.
John II., Pope, 234, 252.
Judas, his end, 128.
Jude, St , 127, 128.
Judiciary powers of the church, 81, 95,
143.
Judges of faith, who are the. 471.
Jurisdiction, nature of, 65, 70, 301, 303,
in penance, 66, of the Bishop of
Rome, 69, 337, 394, given to Peter,
70, the head of, 73, 336, 337, 338,
339, deprived of. 76, bishops have
not an equal. 131, in the Papacj-,
141, 193, meaning of in early church,
65, two kinds of in bishops, 434,
restricted by the Pope, 434.
553
INDEX.
Justinian tlic emperor, 172, 234.
Key, meaning of, 134.
King on ceremonies at Rome, 280.
Kings of Europe, origin of the, 374, Jre-
laiui. 377, nominating hisliops, 410,
411, 412.
Kingdom of Christ. 39, 40, 48, lOl, I06,
not of tiiis world, 48.
Laity excluded from electing a Pope, 259.
Latin, when it became a dead language.
270.
Law courts established, 401, codes of,
523.
Lazarists, founding of the. 545.
Legate, a papal, 73, 420, arclibishop of
Thessalonica, a 224, his power, 298,
299.
Legislative powers, 81, 85, 143.
Leo I., 228.
Leo 11., 251,
Leo III., 261.
Leo IV., 265.
Letter written by Christ, 127.
Letters, our Latin introduced by Alcuin,
262.
LeTvis crowned at Rheims by Stephen V.
Libellus, the, of Adrian, 174.
Liborius, St., 222.
Lies about the clergy, 384.
Linus, St., 211.
Liturgies of the church, 365, 452, 453.
Liturgical Books at Babylon, 481.
Love of God the Holy Ghost, 18, for the
church, 37, 116.
Luke, St., 124.
Lutheran church, the, 102.
Macedonians, errors of, 223.
Manicheans, errors of. 225.
Marriage, bishops' |)ower relating to. 465,
promise of, 465, dispensations for,
466.
Marriage before tlieir own pastor, 517.
Marriage of Christ with the church, 108.
Marriage upheld by the Popes, 259.
Marriage, secret forbidden, 212.
Mary Major, church of, 222, 223.
Marcelinus, St., 217.
Marcellus, St., 217.
Mark, St., 220, the Evangelist. 123, 155.
Maronites, origin of the, 249.
Martin, St., 246.
Martel the emperor, 256.
Martyrs, the, 58.
Mass, the, 18, 88, 190, over the remaitis
of the Martyrs, 217, the (ir.<!t. 64,
called the Ifvstery in the early churcli,
36s, 366, 367.
Mass, the, 18, 88, 190, the first, 64.
Mathias, St.. 128.
Materialists, errors of, 213.
Melchiades, St., 218.
Melchisedech a iigure of Chri.st. 60.
Mercy, wiiy liod has on us, 18.
Metropolitans, meaning of, 506.
Methodist church, the, 102.
Ministers of Christ, 71.
Miracle, a. 71, 72.
Mission of the clergy, 336.
Missal, origin of the, 402.
Missions, tirst established, 329, 330, of
the clergy, 449, 450, 459.
Mission of Christ. 23, 62, of the Holy
Spirit. 23, of the church, 21, 24.
Mixed marriages. 243.
Mogg, Peter usurps tlie see of Constan-
tinople, 230.
Mohammed, 242.
Mohammedans, 242, 264, 243, 379.
Monothelites, or one will in ChrL-it, error
coridennied, 245, 246.
Monsignor, a, 293.
Monarch of Ireland, 377.
Monasteries in early church, 537, 538,
in Europe. 538, 539, dcsiriietion of in
the East. 538, of Mount Carinel, 540,
Moors invjide Spain. 256,
Morals, uiiat are. 188, 190.
Mother, meaning of the word, 123, his-
tory of, 123.
Mother, our, the church, 13.
Mozarabic Liturgy, 260.
Music of the church, 452, bishop's power
over, 464.
Mystic moaning of the church building,
364.
Natures in Christ, tho two, 228, the
Papacy enlighiens Spain on. 260.
Nero tho emperor, 398, 399.
Nestorius, his error.*, 70, 228, con-
demned, 228, 229, 244.
Nice, council of, 168, 193, 219, VII.
general council at, 260.
Nobility, formation of the, 370.
Northmen, the devastations, 365.
Notaries public, their origin, 301.
Novitiate of religious, 532.
Nuncio. Papal, 73.
Nuptial Mass, origin of, 212.
Oath of a bishop at his consecration, 414,
415-
Offerings of the church divided into lour
l)arts, 230, regulation of the, 474,
475, for holy orders forbidden, 474,
belong to the pastor, 518.
Offertory, origin of the word, 366.
Orders, holy, 66, power, of, 63, Christ
exercised all the, 63, must bo giver,
publicly, 212, conferred at tho Quarter
Tenses, 215, among the 8chiamatic8,
336.
INDEX.
653
Ordination, 71, time of, 469, title of,
469, 470.
Ostia, bisliop of wears the pallium, 220,
crowns llie Pope, 273, ranks next
tlie Pope, 280.
Paganism abolished in Rome, 231, d3-ing
out, 240, 241, rooted out of France,
243, destroy in Northern Europe,
257-
Pallium, 308, 322, 344, 419.
Pantheon, ilie consecrated, 242,
Pantheists, errors of, 213.
Papacy, why Christ founded the, 24, 46,
one with Christ, 75, 88, 95, why not
an order above the episcopacy, 75, the
bond of unity, no, in, establish-
ment of the, 133, wir. last forever,
145, in the early Church, 15, etc.,
193, 194, the councils on the, 167,
office of tiie, 184, the, could not be
moved from Rome, 195, the power of
in the early church, 203, etc., appeals
to the, 204, commission of, given to
Peter, 70, settling disputes between
nations, 374, authority of over all
ranks, 459.
Papal reservations, 440.
Paraclete, the, 62.
Parliament, origin of the British, 121,
153.
Parliament, the English, origin of, 402,
Parish, the origin of, 211.
Parish, origin of, 367, 380, in country
founded by monks. 380, sold in I'liig-
laud, 380 country p. founded, 480.
Parish, meaning of the word, 508, lirst
established in Rome, 211, 212, 272,
in Alexandria, 504, in tlio country,
480, once meant the dioce.se, 503,
no p. in early church, 504, division
of, 512.
Parish Priest, SO3-521, in country es-
tablished in IV. century, 504, 505,
city established in X. century, 504,
not instituted by Christ, 505, has not
external jiu-isdiction, 507, cannot
excommunicate, 508, duties of, 508,
509, 510, 517, appointment of. 509,
510, 512, 513, 514, trial of in U. S.,
500, 511, sui)port of, 511, in mis-
sionary countries, 514, imion of with
parish, 514, when an assistant is ap-
pointed. 516, livings of the, 518, 519,
must live in his parish, 520, must
say Mass for las people, 520, controls
finances, 520.
Paschal candle blessed by a deacon, 226.
Pastors, origin of the, 457.
Pastor, meaning of the word 138, 508.
Pastoral staff, meaning of, 508.
Paschal I., 263.
Paschal communion, 517.
Pastors appointed in Home, 217, laity
must go to their ow , 217, 218,
charges against. 515.
Patriarch, meaning of the word, 308,
316.
Patrick, St., 227, 228.
Patrick, St., papal delegate, 313.
Paul, meaning of the word, 124, confes-
sion of, 332.
Pelagians, their errors, 226.
Pelagius, Pope, 238, II., 239.
Penitentiary, the Roman, 296.
Penitentiary canon, 488.
Pepin, tlie emperor, 257, 258.
Persecutions in diverse countrie.s, 330.
Permanent rectors, 498.
Person in Christ, 35.
Peter, meaning of the word, 134, 388,
communion given him by Christ. 129-
150, his body in St. Peter's Church,
219, 388, came to Rome, 397, his
labors, 388-404, opposed by Simon
Magus, 398-400, and Pan! in jiri.><on,
400, Christ appeared to. 400, death
and burial of. 400, all bishops nmst
visit his tomb, 401.
Pew rents, the bishop on, 464, 518.
Philip, St., 127.
Photius excommunicated, 342, author
of the Greek schism, 353, 355.
Pius, St., 214.
Plan of the (Jimrch, the Trinity, 22, 29.
Politics and religion, 21, 22, 142.
Pontian, St.. 215.
Pontius Pilate's letter to the emperor,
397, 399.
Pope, his ottice. Public and private life,
181, 184, 192, elcciiun of a. 277-
288, ceremonies at death of, 281.
Porter, duties of the, 63.
Poverty, vow of, 524.
Prayer of Christ (or unity, 29, 46, public
of the Church. 452.
Prelates and curials, 292.
Precept and advice, difference between,
521, 523-
Priest, Christ the Great High, 44, 62, 63,
64. 65, 79, 90.
Priesthood of the apostles, 61.
Priesthood, the eternal. 60-79.
Primates and archbishops, origin of, 303,
304, established by Peter, 305, 307,
tiie different patriarchal sees, 307,
. 308.
Prime minister of Christ, 131.
Profession of faith. 519, 520, the eternal
of Christ, 60-78.
Prophet, what is a, 79, 82.
554
INDEX.
Presbyterian church, the, 102, origin of
the, 384.
Presbytery, the ancient, 220, 480-482.
Primate, meaning of tiie word, 308,
office of, 319.
Primacy, disputes regarding, 314, in the
ancient -church, 320.
Primate, 328.
Propaganda, congregation of, 295, what
churches are under the, 295.
Property of religious orders, 525.
Property, churcli, ahcnation ol, 229,232.
Protestant services, the, 103, 105, 106.
Protestantism, eifect of. 103, 104, lo6,
386.
Prothonotaries, 358.
Psalms sung by alternate choirs, 224.
Pudens tlie Senator converted, 398.
Punishment of false accusers, 224.
Quarter Tenses, 215.
Quebec the first see in N. America, 315.
Rationalism originated by Abelard, 378.
Rebellion against the church, effect of,
95, 96, 97.
Rector of cathedral, 494, a parish, 509,
immovable in the U. S , 510.
Redeemer, promise of a, 20.
Reformation, causes of, 384.
Regulars of baptisms, niarriages, &c. $20.
Religion, what is, 106.
Religious orders, 521 546, not necessarj-
ior the church, 521, perfections of ni
the church, 527, precepts and advices
of Christ, 521, 523, 531, follow
Christ's advice, 523, nature of tlie, 523,
526, 532, strive towards perfection,
523, the three vows of, 524, 525,
vocation for the, 526, Christ and re-
ligious, 527, origin of the, 528, in the
early church, 528, labors of the, 529,
secular and regular, 529, are parishes,
530, driven from the East, 530, how
establisiied, 530, 531, profession of,
532, vows of, 532, 534, 535, must
not be detained against tJieir will,
532, clergy of recite the Breviarj',
533, roust have a vocation to, 534,
l)roperty of tlie, 534, oljediencc of,
the, 535, the Pope is their superior,
536, exemptions of, 536, rights re-
garding sacraments, 536, origin of in
l^gypti 536, 537, Klias the lirsl monk
540, diverse families of, 540-546.
Representative, the, 71.
Report, lilt' (inancial, 518.
Reservations, Papal, 471.
Resignation of church offices, 383.
Ring, Pope's, broken at his deaUi, 281.
Rites, congregation of, 294.
Rock, Christ the, 133, 134.
Rome, foundation of tlie city, 147.
Roman Bishops, the lirst, 209-266,
Catholic, meaning of word. 194, con-
gregations during a vacancy, 280.
Roman Ritual introduced into England,
263.
Roman empire moved to Constantinople,
220.
Rome, the capital of the chnrcli, 195,
the diocese of, 103, the iirst bishop
of, 269, chosen by Peter, 269, 270,
396, 397, influences of Christian, 308,
369.
Rota the Roman, 297.
Rules of religious orders, 533,
Ruling power of the Church, 94, 95, 97,
185, object of. 140, 142.
Rural deans, 45*8, 485, 486.
Sabellians, errors of. 216.
Sacraments, tlie seven, 90, 91, 92, ad-
ministered by their own pastor, 230.
Salt at blessing holy water, 213.
" Sanctus," when added to the Mass,
213.
Sanctifies, how the church, 90, 91,
bishop, 451.
Sanctify, meaning of, 87, II7.
Saturday kept holy, 226.
.Scholastic method. 243.
Schools first established by Pope Sergius,
369.
Schism, the Greek, 342.
School, how the church differs from a,
450, origin of, 491.
Sedan chair of the Pope, origin of, 257.
Seminaries, council of Trent on, 499, in-
spectors of, 498.
Semiarians, errors of, 223.
Senate of the universal church. 274, an-
tiquity of, 289, 292, how it meets,
292, liusincss before the, of the dio-
cese. 477-502.
Senators, power of the Roman, 398.
Septuagint Version of tlie Bible, 224.
Sergius II., 265.
Services, origin of our, 362, 365, 366,
condemned, 238.
Severenus, Pope, 245.
Shave, clergy ordered to, 214.
Shepherd, the, 102.
Simplicius, St.. 229.
Simon Magus, his errors, 398, death,
400.
Simony,
Sin disturbed God's works, 16, 17, 19,
nature of, 29, how atoned for, 20, 30,
power of forgiving, 64.
Singing the services, origin of, 365.
Siricius, St., 225.
Sixtus I., St, 213, HI., 238.
INDEX.
555
Slavery in Europe, 370, 371, 372.
Son of God, Christ the, 34, crowned, 62.
Sons of God, we are tiie, 34.
Sorbonne, errors of Uie, 506, 507.
Soterus, St., 214.
Soul ol ilio olmrcli,,the, 23, 31, 32, II2.
Spain, liisliops of receive a papal decree,
225.
Spirit, ilic lioly in tlic clnircli, 35, 37, 43.
Spouse of llie clmrdi, 76, 68.
Statesman, Ciirisl a <rrcai, 153.
Stations in Home, 229.
Stephen, St., 216, II., 257, the heretic
condemned, 251, V.. 263.
Strangle priests, 473, 474.
Student for the minisir^-, 226.
Students, laws relating; to, 468.
Subdeacon, oBice of, 63, antiquity of,
215.
Substance and a % 62.
Sunday rest,origiri ^f the, 462.
Sunday called the Lord's da}'. 220.
Sunday .«er\ ices, origin of, 481.
Suspension of priests in early times, 370,
Sylvester, St, 219.
Sylverius, Wt., 237.
Symmachus, St., 232.
Synod, a diocesan, 357.
Synod, when lield, 497.
Teacher of the Chinch, the, 179, 180,
the bishop is a, 450,
Telesphore, St., 213.
Temporal power of the Popes, 255,241,
252,258,261, 371.
Theodore 1.. 246, bishop, appointment of,
249-
Theological canon, 488.
Thessalonica, archbisliop of, 312, 313.
Theodosius sends a delegation to Rome,
225.
Thomas, St., 127, 379.
Three cliaptcrs condemned, 238, 243.
Throne, the bishop's, 368, 451.
Tiara of the Pope, meaning of ilie, 393.
Time, elapsing between orders, 226.
Title, church natnre of, 66, 67, 349,
Christ's, 66, 68, of the Pope, 67, at or-
dination, 67, 473, of the (jlergy, 73,
originated in Rome, 212, esUiblis.lied
by Christ, 148, should not be taken
away without cause, 515.
Titular churches of Rome, 272.
Transfiguration, explanation of, 364.
Translation of Bible into Latin, 365.
Trinity, the, during eternity. 16, 177,
why they created 16, generation of the
Persons of, 19, 31, 43, and the
cluirch one being, 59.
Trinitarians, origin of, 541.
Triple crown or Tiara of the Pope, 261
Trials of priests in ear'v Church, 370,
Truth, what is, 82, 83, 84, of the Father.
Christ the, 37, 49, the object of the
mind 37, of mathematics, 49, in the
chnrcli unchanged, 121.
Twice married cannot be ordained, 229.
Union of God and man in Christ. 29, 46.
Uniting with other dioce.'^es, 383, 384.
Unity of God, 62, 63, of the church, 99
— 119.
Universal Cluirch, the, was first, 145.
Universities, founded by the church,
377-
Urban, St., 215.
Ursinus, schism of. 223.
Vacancy of an epi>copal throne, 409.
Vacation, each year allowed. 520.
Vestments, worn only in chuich, 216.
Viaticum, 518.
Vicar of Christ, 450.
Vicar of the Pope, 297—300, 326, 440,
for Thessalonica, 298, for ]''rjince,
298, nature of the office, 298, 299.
Vicar of the pastor, 132.
Vicar-General, nature of, 131, 132, of
Christ, 75, 76, 86, 113, 129- 151,
145, of the bishop, 132, of Christ, the
Pope the, 153, 184, 183.
Vigilius, Pope, 238.
Virgin nuns, rules for, 214, 227, 229.
Virtues, the cardinal, 186, or the saints,
117.
Visiting bishop, 408, 409, 425.
Vision of St. John, object of, 362, 364.
Vow, nature of a, 472, 524, 532, reserved
to tlie IIolv See, 473, power of bish-
op over, 473.
Vulgate version of the Bible, 365.
Water added to wine at Mass, 213, holy,
213.
Week days called ferials, 220.
Westminster Abbey, founding of, 242.
" Who the day before he suffeied " &c.,
when ihe.se words were added to the
Mass, 212.
Wife, antiquity of, 269.
Wilfred, bishop of York appeals to Rome.
250, 252.
Wills, the two in Christ, 245, 246, 247,
250, 420.
Women, covered in church, 211.
Wonders of the incarnation, 18.
Zachary, Pope, 256.
Zephyrinus, St., 215.
Zosimus, St., 226.
THE SEVEN
Gates of Hbaven,
Or, The Teachings, Discipline, Customs, and Manners of
ADMINISTERING THE SACRAMENTS
Among The Abyssiniaiis, The Anglicans, The Armenians, The Baptists, The Catriolics, The
t'ongregationalists, The Copts, The Episcopalians, The Greeks, The Jacobites, The
Lutherans, The Maronites, The Methodists, The Xestorians, The Presby-
terians, Tlie Syrians, Etc., Etc.
WITH THE DIFFERENCES
Between these Various Christian Denominations Clearly and Simply Explained for
the People ;
THE BEIjIEF of the EA-RIj-V- CIiE.ISTIA.3SrS,
The Changes of Discipline, and the Abuses Condemned in Different Centuries:
GIVEN WITH THE
^»|aditions of M\ ^bi|i8tian Jfeoples delating to these J^oly Bites.
SO AS TO SHOW THE RULES AND CEREMONIES OF EACH CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
Rev. Jas. Iv. IVIeagher,
Pastor of St. James' Church, Cazenovia, N. Y., author of "Teaching Truth by Signs and
Ceremonies," "The Festal Year," " The Great Cathedrals of the World," etc., etc.
OOISTTENTS.
INTRODUCTION. — Man, how bom, naturally and spiritually. — What is a sacrament ?— Dif-
ferent classes of sacraments. — Ceremonies of the sacraments. — Matter and form of the sacra-
ments.— The ministerof the sacraments.— Intention in the minister. — Effects of the sacraments.
— The character they impress on the soul. — Receiver of the sacraments. — Apostolic Liturgies.
— Liturgies of St. James, of the Copts, Alexandrian, of St. John, the Mozarabic, the Galilean,
of Salisbury, of Egbert of York, the Anglican, Episcopalian, Latin or Roman, Abyssinians,.
Albigenses, Armenians, Baptists, Congregationalists, Copts, Episcopalians, Greeks, Jacob-
ites, Lutherans, Maronites, Nestorians, Presbyterians, Syrians, Councils, etc.
BAPTISM. — Meaning of the word.— Definitions of baptism. — Prophets on, figures of baptism..
—Traditions of all nations relating to.— The wonders of water.— Baptism of Christ.— Tra-
ditions of the Church. — Necessity of baptism, of desire, of blood, and of water.— EflFects of
baptism. — Infant baptism. — The matter and form of baptism of water, baptism by sprinkling,
4)ouring, and by immersion. — Baptism among Catholics, Protestants, and Orientals.— The
minister of baptism. — Bishops, priests, laymen, and ladies baptizing. — Early troubles relating
to re-baptizing heretics. — Vestments worn in various Churches when baptizing. — Time and
place of baptism. — Baptismal fonts and baptisteries. — Godfather and godmother. — Origin and
history of the ceremonies of baptism, etc.
CONFIRMATION.— Makes us perfect.— Figures of, among Ihe Jews.— The Fathers on. —
Instituted by Christ.— Early Church on. — Imposition of hands.— Anointing with chrism in
the East and West. — Form of in East and West.— Among the Episcopalians. — Chrism among
the Orientals.— Sponsors.— In the East, priest or bishop, in the West, only bishops confirm. —
How the Episcopalians confirm. — Essential parts of —Minister of — History, ancient customs,
and preparations.— Effects of. — Origin, history, and meaning of ceremonies of confirmation,
etc.
EUCHARIST.- Names, figures, and definitions.— Bodily and spiritual foods.— Fathers and
St. Paul on.— Christ's promise.— The last supper.— How the change takes place. — Communion
in the early Church. — Chalice once given the laity. — Reasons for changing communion in \h*
early Church.— Oriental customs. — The chalice.— Grecian and Oriental ways and manners
The bread and wine.— Words, customs, and ceremonies at Communion. — Condemned abuses.
— Laity once gave Communion. — Reasons for changing that. — Communion of the sick.-^
Where kept. — Tabernacle. — How necessary for salvation.— First Communion.— Holy vessels.
— Words of, in Protestant Churches. — Minister and receiver, and preparations.— EflFects of.—
Time and place of. — Laws relating to Communion, etc.
PEN ABfCK.— Nature of.— Satisfying for sin. — Penance a virtue.— Sin the object of penance.-^
Perfect and imperfect contrition.— Penance as a sacrament.— Early Church. — Fathers on. —
History of penance in the Eastern and Western Churches. — Changes of discipline.— The keys.
— Minister of penance. — Public penances in past ages.— Material and words of penance. — Con-
trition necessarJ^ — Early customs. — Confessions among Copts, Greeks, and Orientals. — Places;
where heard.— Changed disciplines.— Object of.— Satisfaction for sin. — Severity of the early-
penances. — Penitents in the early Church. — Ancient penitential customs. — Public sisners.— •
Oriental confessions. — Receiver of this sacrament. — Necessity of penance. — Its effects. — Ex»
amination of conscience.— Manner of confessing sin.— Jurisdiction.— The priest a father, phy-
sician, a teacher, and a judge. — The secrets of the confessional, etc.
EXTREME UNCTION.— How called by early writers.— When established by Christ.—
Fatherson.— Matter and form of.— Parts anointed in all Churches. — Effects of — Ministers and
receivers of. — History of, in all ages. — Changes of discipline, and peculiar customs of other
Churches, etc.
HOLY ORDERS.— Nature of orders.— Ranks of clergymen in early Churches.— Orders a
sacrament.— Scriptures, Fathers, and early traditions on. — What orders Christ established. —
Propagated by external rites. — Bishops, priests, deacons, subdeacons, acolytes, exorcists,
readers, porters, tonsured. — Election of bishops in all ages and countries.— Election of lower
ministers. — Bishops superior to priests.— Episcopalians, Orientals, etc.— Ordination in various
Churches. — Imposition of hands.— Minister and subject of orders.— Hierarchy of orders and
jurisdiction.— Christ head of all orders.— Effects of orders.— Celibacy of clergy.— Exceptions
to law of celibacy.— Rules of the English Church.— Election, ordination, and mission of the
clergy.— Vocation.— Customs of early Church.— Time and place.— Obstacles.— Origin, cere-
monies, and history of lower orders. — Consecration of bishops in all Churches, etc.
MATRIMONY.— Generation of creatures.— .\dam and Eve's marriage figured union of Christ
with his Church.— Why Eve was made from a rib.— Object of marriage, courtship, engage-
ments.—Rules relating to.— Bans, and time and place of, publication of.— Nature of.— Marriage
a sacrament. — Matter, form and unity of.— Of widowers and widows.— What marriages can
be dissolved.— Rules for married people.— Time and place of marriage.— Receiver of nuptial
mass and blessing.— Oriental rules and ceremonies of.— The crowns in the Ea,st.— Impedi-
ments of some, rendering marriage invalid.— Others forbidding.— Dispensations, etc.
INDEX.— From pages 462 to 473.
The most exhaustive work in any language on the sacraments. Also it contains
43 Bet^utifVil Krncravin«s,
Showing the rites and ceremonies of all Churches, Catholic, Protestant, and Oriental Churches.
Extra fine paper, cloth, costly stamp in gold, 92.00 1 paper covers, SI.OO.
Aifenta make from $7!>.00 to $150.00 a month. Affftita trantrti in every place,
tvtcn atUl city. Address at onee^
Eer. Jas. L. MEAk^HER, CazenoTia, N. X
"A REMARKABLE BOOK."
Teacjing Truth iiif ^ign^^deiiBmoniB^,
OB,
The Church— Its Rites and Services Explained
FOR the People.
T\A7ENTY- FIFTH EDITION.
Beitig n grapliic ind clcnr desciiiptiox and explanation of the ChtuMJli— Its shape,
and why ii is bnilt in that manner, the meaning of each part, a history of akchitec-
TUUE, scuLPTUHK, MUSIC and PAINTING. —The THINGS in the Church, tlieirmeaning
and their object, the Statues, Images, Pictured, and the I'ictorial windows.
The Sanctuary, why separated frcm the rest of the Chmrh. — The riGHT, its
meaning. — The candles, why used, ihcir laeaiilnt;, tl'.eir reasons and their history.
The Altar, it^ hrstory, why made in that way, what it si^rnifies. The Altar
among the Jews, the way the tabkhnaci-b of Moses was made, the meaning or
each thing in the ancie'il i abrknaci.e, and how onr < hiirclies arc ma'le like it.
— The Holy Vessels and -.rNENs Ut-ed ia our Servi^.es. — Why we have latin .nnJ
uot some modem tongue.
The Vestments, their m-^anings and their histories.— The six worn by bishops
and priests, and the nine worn by tl:e bisl^oj.s nply.— .The meaning of each Vestment
in particular. — The color of the Vestments, and. meaning of the colors.
THE MASS EXPLAINED.
Every movement of the Celelirant given when safd bj' either a priest, a bishop, or
the POPE, with the reasons and the meanings of rach Ceremony.— The Mass op
IlIastek given word for word as a sptciineti of the other Masses. — A histokv of the
ilass us said by the Clergymen of the Latin liiXE.
The Funeral Ceremonies given, witli the'r m'^anings and the origin of all (he
rites around t lie coffin and ttie grave. The laws relaung^to the burial of the dead
and of the cemeteries in the Christian Churcli.
Vespers and IJenediction, with the siguificationc and histories of the cere-
monies of the afternoon service.
The most Complete and Exhaustive "Work ever published in the English lan-
guage on that subject. The Boole is ihe labou of many years, the ideas having been
lalcen from the Great Writers and the Fathers of the Church, and from all who
treat of these subjects.
The Boole is intensely interesting to all parties, of whatever religion, saying
nothing of any form of helipf, but telling in the simplest words the meaning of SQ
•auch that is mysterious in the Church.
Illustrated with Twenty-one Beautiful Engravings,
Done by the Greatest Engravers cf the world, never before published in this country,
ot all the Great Cathedrals and the most Celebrated Churches in the world,
and whatevr; is beautiful in religion.
PAPER, SO CENTS. CLOTH, Sl.OO.
Agents mfr'i* from $50 to $125 a month selling the Book. Agents wanted
wherever the English language is spoken.
. Address.- Rev. JAS. L. MEAGHER,
Cazenovia, N. ?■
THE FESTAL YEAR;
OR,
The Origiij, Ijistory, Ceremonies and ^eaijiijgs of the Suijdays, Sea-
soijs, Feasts and Festivals of the Churclj during the Year.
Explained for the Peoplbl
:By Rev. JA.S. Tj. MKiVC-HBjrt,
AuOwrqf Teaching Truths by Signs and Ceremonies ; The Oreat CaOMral* qfthe
World, etc.
FIFTH EDITiax.
<3ivinK in clear nnd simple words the origin, history and astrosomioai, causes of
the HouB, the day, the week, the month, and the year, with cnetome of the people
of antiquity as well as in oiir days, relating to these divisions of time, as well as the
origin and meaning of the names of the days of the week, and the months and
seasons of the year.
The rEASTS of the Pagans. Jews, and Chrktians are described wi» h the PtBUO
Offices of the Christian Church, with a complete history and description of the cele-
■brated Gregorian Calendar, the meaning of the religious seasons, the parts of the
Bible read during these times of the Christian Year, and the titles ol the Misfal
explained thoroughly.
The Advent Season, its origin, history and meanings with its 4 weeks tell-
ing of the 4.000 years before Christ's coming, and its 4 Sundays, typifying his 4 com-
ings, with the Spotless Conception and antiquity of all these feasts.
The C'liristiiias Season, ceremonies of Christmas Eve, anthjuity, history
and meanings of this time, celebrated by all Christians. Christmas Day, New Years
Day. Ei'iPHANY. the Holy Kame and the Pkbsentation with their history and the
meaning of their ceremonies.
The S«|>tiia}$esiiiia Season with its ORIGIN, history and XEANTNO.also Sep-
TDAGESIMA, SeXAOESIMA, QdINQUAOESIMA SUNDAYS, ASH WEDNESDAY aud SHROVE-
TIDE.
The I^enten Season with its origin fVom the Apostles, the la^vs of ancient
nations, councils and decrees aud its history from the time of Christ, -wrth ita 4 Sum-
days aud Passio.n Souday.
The Hol.v Week Season, its origin and history. The ceremotjies of Palm
Sunday, singine the Passion, the "Tenebrab," on Holy Wednesday, the blessing
of the Holy Oils, the washing op the feet, the processions of Hoi-y Tkursday
*nd of Good Friday, the 12 lessons, the kissing of the cross, blessing of the fike of
the PASCHAL CANDLE and of the baptismal font on Holy Saturday are oivkn with
THE meanings, HISTORIES AND AUTHORS OP THESE MOST ANCIENT and VENERABLB
CEREMONIES.
The Kaster Season, ancient troubles relating to Easteb, the antiquity, his-
tory and MEANING of this bea.<on, the greatest of the year, with the bervicks and
CEREMONIES of Easter and Low Sundays, the Annunciation, the A^icension and
Pentecost Siiudar.
The After-Pentecost Season, its history and meanino, with the history
and significations of Tiunity Sunday, Corpus Chiusti, the Asuumptiok, Feasts or
All Saints and of All Souls.
Thus the religious year is divided info 7 Seasons, with 5 Pbasts in Mch.
The whole work is the most complete and exhaustive ever published on that
Important subject perhajjs in anv language, and is like a vast libhaby condensed
into one book, the author having houglit over $>00.00 worth of books, besides those
in his possession and cotisuitwl in other libriirie*. Beautifully illustrated with 19
engravings of the most celebrated cathedrals of the world.
Fine English Cloth, 335 Pages, large, clear type, Postpaid $1,00-
J'lrnKe fitio,e thin to some one irho frill net n« Afjetit, Agentit mnlce
jrotnlftTS.Ott to ftSO.OO per month, a.s the hiifhext tli.teottutH are ifiren.
AffitntH ivanfeU in every town and city where the ICnyliah Utnyuoge i»
sj/ohen.
ADDRK8S: Rev. JAS. L. MEAGHER,
Cazeuoviai 9f> 7
A ^UATJIII'IIL ^OOK!
fiRaiCmilEDRALSjNDMOSTCELEBRllKO CHURCHES
OF THE \NOn\JD.
Giving their Founders, Patrons, Builders, and Architects ;
With^a Complete History of Each up to our times.
ALSO,
-^ DESCRIPTION OF THEIR DIFFERENT STVLES OF ARCHITECTURE.
AND THE SCULPTURES, PAINTINGS, ORNAMENTS, and CEREMONIES
OF THESE WONDERFUL TEMPLES OF CHRISTENDOIVI.
BEAUTIFUIiliY ILLUSTRATED with GO of the most isiiperb Eugrav-
iugs, by the Moi^t Kiiiiiivut Artists.
Adapted by
Rev. JA-S. L. jVIEAGHKR,
AUTHOR iOP "teaching TROTH BY SIGNS AND CEIIEMONIES: ' ""HE FESTAL TEAR J "
"the seven gates Of HEAVEN;" ETC., ETC.
One of the most beautifully gotten up works ever published in this
country ; and gives a historic account of the great and celebrated
churches of the world in the different countries where the Christian
religion has spread. The following are the church buildings described:
St. Peter's, Rome ; St. John, Lateran, Rome ; St. Mary Major, Rome ;
The Cathedral, Milan; St. Mark's, Venice; The Cathedral, Florence;
The Cathedral, Pisa.
Notre Dame, Paris ; Holy Chapel of the Palace, Paris ; St. Denis,
Paris ; The Cathedral, Rheims ; The Cathedral, Amiens ; Church of St.
Owen, Rouen; The Cathedral, Chartres; The Cathedral, Bourges.
The Cathedral, Canterbury; The Cathedral, York; The Cathedral,
Salisbury ; The Cathedral, Lincoln ; St. Patd's, Xiondon ; ■Westminster
Abbey, London.
The Cathedral, Cologne; The Cathedral, Metz; The Cathedral,
Spire; The Cathedral, Strasburg.
The Cathedral St. Stephen's, Vienna.
The Cathedral, Antwerp; Church of St. Gudtde, Brussels; The
Cathedral, Burgos.
The Cathedral, Cordova; The Cathedral, Seville; The Cathedral,
Toledo ; St. Sophia, Constantinople ; Church of the Holy Sepulchre,
Jerusalem ; St. Isaac's Church, St. Petersburgh ; Church of Notre
Dame, Montreal ; The Cathedral, New York ; The Cathedral, Albany ;
St. Joseph's Church, Albany ; The Cathedral, Rochester ; The Cathedral,
Buffalo; The Cathedral, Boston; The Cathedral, Providence; The
Cathedral, Hartford; The Cathedral, Springfield; The Cathedral,
Philadelphia; The Cathedral, Scranton; and some Volumes contain
Trinity Church, New York.
The engravings are mostly done by the great Pannamaker, who en-
graved Gustave Core's designs, and are exceedingly beautiful. * The
whole work is a masterpiece of beauty on fine thick paper.
FINE CLOTH, ^3.00 ; SUPERB GILT, $3.30.
Agents make from $75.00 to $150.00 per month. Agents wanted every-
where. Address,
Rev. JAS. L. MEAGHER,
Cazenovia, Sfn ir>
THE MIRROR OF THE UNIVERSE;
— OR, THE —
Agreement of Science and Religion.
This most interesting work in fine cloth, will be sent
to any address postpaid, on receipt of price, $i.oo.
Agents wanted for the sale of this and other works
•written by Father Meagher. Address, Rev. Jas. L.
Meagher, Cazenovia, N. Y.
The following Contents give but a few of the interesting
subjects treated:
CONTENTS.
Introduction — Science and Religion — Man, Beauty, Truth
and Goodness — Mathematics — Scholastics — Metaphysics —
Importance of Sound Principles for the Sciences, etc 9-22
THE MINERiVL KINGDOM.
CHAPTER I.
ORIGIN OF THE WOULD.
Creation— Reasons for and Against the Eternity of Matter— The
Nebular Theory Described— Formation of the Sun, Moon,
and Planets— Universal Gravitation— Origin of Light,
Heat, Motion etc.— Wonders of Astronomy, Geology,
Mineralogj', etc 23-3?
CHAPTER II.
CONSTITUTION OF MATTER.
The Dynamic, Atomic and Scholastic Theories Relating to Mat-
ter, Monads, Atoms, Molecules, Primeval Matter and Sub-
stantial Form— Physics— Chemistry— Movement— Force-
Energy— Laws of Crystalization— Forces of Matter, etc. . . 83-43
CHAPTER III.
LIGHT, HE.VT, ATTRACTION ETC.
Extension— Sound— Music— All Nature Founded on Mathematics
—Solids— Liquids— Gases— Laws of Light, Heat, Elec-
tricity—Chemical Changes— Geometry of Crystalization-
Substances— Modes and Accidents of Matter, etc 44-55
* CONTENTS.
THE VEGETABLE KINGDOM.
CHAPTER IV.
HOW PLAKTS DIFFER FROM MINERALS.
"Plants have a Different Origin, Composition, Constitution, De-
velopment, Dumtioii, Reproduction than Minerals — The
' Plant Compared to the Mineral, etc 56-63
CHAPTER V.
THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF PLANTS.
History of the Classification of Plants — Systems of Linnaeus,
Bernard de Jussieu, De CandoUe, John Lindley — The
Exogenae and Endogenae — Botany, etc 64-66
CHAPTER VI.
WHAT IS LIFE?
Life is Movement from "Within— Vegetable, Animal and Intel-
lectual Life — Substantial Forms of Minerals — Vital Prin-
ciple of Plants — Sensitive Souls of Animals— Immortal
Soul of Man — Pure Spirits— Various Objects of These Living
Princijjles — Life — Movement Remains "Within the Living
Being — Generation — Perfect Life Found only in God, etc. 67-75
CHAPTER VH.
NATURE OP VEGETABLE LIFE.
Living Organisms differ from Minerals — Testimony of the
Learned — Analysis — Synthesis — Plants and Animals Use and
Control Mineral Forces — Operations of Vegetable Life —
Growth, Nutrition, Reproduction, etc 76-89
CHAPTER VIII.
GROWTH OP PLANT, ANIMAL AND MAN.
"Wonders of Living Organisms — The Soul Builds the Body —
Development of the Young — Cold and Warm-Blooded
Animals — No Feeling in Plants — Cells — Manner of Growth
Determined by God— The Soul Builds the Body Accordina-
to Fixed Laws— The Child before Birth, etc '83-91
CHAPTER IX.
NUTRITION OF PLANT, ANIMAL AND MAN.
Pood — Growth and Nutrition Identical in Plants — Growth stops
at last in Animals and Man — Nutrition Continues —
Living Organisms Require Nourishment — Snirits Remain
CONTENTS.
Unchanged — Reasonable Beings Grow with Truth and
Happiness — Circulation of the Sap and Blood — Breathing of
Plants and Animals, etc 93-100
CHAPTER X.
THE GENERATION OF BEINGS.
All Living Beings Generate Another like Themselves — Animal
and Vegetable Souls Generated — Human Soul Created by
God — Generation in Creatures a Figure of tlie Trinity —
Seeds — Sexual and Uusexual Generation — Pollen— The
Egg — The Embryo — Generation of a Thought — Generation
of the Persons of the Trinity, etc 101-110
THE ANIMAL KINGDOM.
CHAPTER XI.
now ANIMALS DIFFER FROM PLANTS.
•Object of Vegetal)le Life — The Organism of Animals — All Sur-
rounding Bodies — Plants have No Sensation — Plants Com-
posed of Carbon. Oxygen and Hydrogen — To these in
Animals add Nitrogen — Animal Species more Numerous
than Those of Plants — Animals have Higher and More
Perfect Organizations than Plants — One or More Sense in
Every Animal — Animal Instincts, etc 111-119
CHAPTER Xn.
KINDS AND SPECIES OF ANIMALS.
Five Great Divisions of Animals — Animalcules — Radiates, Mol-
lusks. Articulates, Vertebrates — Description of Each Class —
Zoology, etc 120-125
CHAPTER XIII.
SKELETON, MUSCLES AND NERVES.
The Human Skeleton — Bones — Composition and Structure in
Man and Animals— The Muscular System — Conijnisition and
Description of the Voluntary and Involuntary ^Muscles — The
Heart — Tendons — The Nerves — Their Funrtinn«— Functions
and Structure of Spinal Column — Bruin, etc 126-134
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XIV.
THE FIVE SENSES.
Material Things, the Object of the Five Senses— Special Nerves of
the Senses — Touch Resides in all Parts of the External Skin,
but especially in Tongue and Fingers — Taste in the Mouth
espe( iall y in Tongue — Smell, Description of — Enorniousjv
Developed in some Animals — Hearing — External, Middle,
and Internal Ear in Man — The Drum, Hammer, Stirrup, An-
vil, Labyrinth, Cochha — Investigations of Helmholtz, Corti
and otners — Wonders of the Inner Ear— Seeing — Laws of
Optics — Description of the Eye, Cornea, Crystaline Lense —
Retina — 0[>tic Nerve, etc 135-149
CHAPTER XV.
IffTERIOR SENSES, IMAGINATION, MEMORY, INSTINCT, ETC.
The Common Sense — Sensations — Fancy — Memory — Wonders of
Instinct, etc 150-155
THE HUMAN KINGDOM,
CHAPTER XVI.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MAN AND ANIMALS.
3Ian a Reasonable Animal — The Highest and Most Complicated
Organism — Art, Commerce, Industry, Mind, Will, Liljerty,
Education, Sociability — Man a Mineral, a Plant and an Ani- "
mal — Reason — Development of Man — Growth, Decay and
Death, etc 156-167
CHAPTER XVII.
THE MIND.
Universal Truth, the Direct Object of the Mind — Particular
Truth, the Indirect Object of the Mind — Ideas — ^Thoughts —
In God the Thought or Idea is the Son — Superiority of the
Mind over Other Powers- -Origin of Ideas — Language — Wit
and Humor — Concrete and Alastract Ideas— Plans and Rea-
sons of All Things in God — Conduct of the Mind— Intel-
lectual Memorv-^The Mind, the Image of God — The Active
and Passive Mind, etc 168-180
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XVIII.
WHAT IS REASON?
The Mind in Action is Reason — Nouns, Adjectives, Verbs, Ad-
verbs, Pronouns — T!ie Foundations of Grammmar — The
Verb to Be — Substance, Existence— Tlie Eternal Idea of .
God's Mind, the Son, the Model of all Creatures — The
True— The False— The Good— The Bad— Axioms, Princi-
ples, Reasoning, Syllogisms — The Universal — Genus —
Species — Sentences, Subject and Predicate — Judgments —
Deduction, Induction — The Natural Sciences, etc 181-194
CHAPTER XIX.
THE FREE-WILL.
(Jniversal Good the Object of the Free-Will— The Will the
Reasonable Appetite — The Mind Enlightens the Will —
Happiness — Learning — Mind and Will in God — Power of the
Will over the Other Faculties — Sin the Abuse of Reason —
Sources of Laws — The Will the Foundation of Liberty —
Conscience— The Good — Happiness— The Mind of Man —
Motives — God the Final End of all Created Reasons — In
God, the True is the Son, the Good, the Holy Spirit, etc. 195-206
CHAPTER XX.
WHAT IS LIBERTY?
The Free-Will in Action is Liberty — To Possess the Good is Joy
and Happiness — Nature of Liberty — We are Free Regarding
Particular Good Not Relating to Our Final Happiness — Lib-
erty of Man, Angel and of God — Authority over Creatures —
Why We Are Never Satisfied in This World — Physical,
Metaphysical and Moral Liberty — Election — Human Liberty
a Primary Truth — Predestination — Sin the Abuse of Lib-
erty— God Free in Creating — Liberty and Grace, etc . . 207-325
CHAPTER XXT.
UNION OP SOUL AND BODY.
The Soul the Substantial Form of the Body— Bodily Heat — Sur-
prising Changes in the Body — Wonders of the Human Body
\ — Child Resembles the Parents — Influence of Soul on Body
Develops the Temperaments — The Nervous, Phlegmatic,
Bilious and Sanguine Temi)eraments— Substantial Union
of Soul and Body — Chemical and 3Iechanical Unions —
Union of God and Man in Christ — the Unity of the Organ-
ism— The Incarnation of Christ — Personality in Man, Christ
and in God — Accidental, Substantial and Personal Unions —
Mind and Will Superior to the Body — The Soul h Whole
and Complete in Every Part of the i3ody, etc 224-250
CO:s TENTS.
CH.VPTEH XXII.
IMMORTALITY OF TIIK SOUL.
Importance of tlieSuhjeet — Repu^-iiMiux- to Dfjith— TfeAFurds nnd
PLinishments of this Life not Sufficient -The Soul is Imni.i-
terial. and Tlierefore Immortal — Force Indestruetiltle — The
Soul Indestructible in the Mind — Mind and Will are the Im-
mortal Parts of Man — Animal Souls — Tiie Human Soul a
Complete Spiritual Substance — Truth Immortal is grasped
by the soul which also must be Immortal — The La-t
Resurrection — The Soul has No Parts — Generation Proses
Immortality, etc 231-270
CHAPTER XXIII.
THE FALL AND HOW REPAIKED.
Superiority of Man — Science — Creation of jVIan— Man was made
Perfect at First— The Temptation and Fall— Original Sin —
Remainsof the Fall — The Atonement — How Christ Re|)aired
the Fall of Man — The Agent, Representative and JNIinister
of Christ 271-290
THE SPIRIT KINGDOM.
CHAPTER XXIV.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SPIRITUAL AND THE MATERIAL.
Matters Visible and Invisible — Extension, Time, Space etc.
Belong Only to Matter — Substances — Living and Non-living
Bodies— Pure Spirits— The Visible World — Spiritual Thin<>s
Difficult to See, etc 201-297
CHAPTER XXV.
THE ANGELS.
The Angels are Intellectual Forces — Time, Place and State of
Their Creation — Their Wonderful Power — Sin and Fall of
the Angels — Their Manner of Life and Mode of Reasoning — ■
Their Mind, Will, Liberty etc — Angelical Conversations —
The Good See God Face to Face, the Bad are the Demons
in Hell — The Nine Hierarciiies of Heavenly Spirits — Each
Choir has a Special Name and Object, etc 298-32 J
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XXVI.
HEAVEN.
The True and the Good, that is the Son and Holy Spirit, the
Objects of Created Mind und Will— All Men Desire Hap-
piness—True Happiness Cannot be Found in This Life— Rea-
son Why— Heaven is for Created Reasonable Beings— Hea-
ven is to Have the True, to Possess the Good, that is the
Son and Spirit— Heaven is the Possession of God— Heaven
not a Place but a State— Love— Why God Loves Us— Love
Unites— The Light of Glory —The Vision of God— Different
Degrees of Happiness in Heaven, etc 322-33&
CHAPTER XXVH.
Hell follows the Abuse of Reason— No Redemption in Hell-
Hell God's Prison— Sinners send Themselves to Hell— Pains
of Hell not Purgative— The Evils of Sin— Death of the
Sinner— Hell the Absence of Truth and Goodness— Nature's
Laws Inflexible— Hell is the Loss of God— In Hell no
Supernatural Truth or Happiness— Hell is Mental Stiffering
-How the Demons Fell— The Sin of Lucifer— He Led the
Bad Angels to Perdition— State of the Damned— Demoniac
• Possession, Ghosts, etc— Hell a State not a Place— Stub-
borness of the Damned— They adhere to Error and to Evil-
No change in Hell— The Sufferings of Hell will Last For-
ever-Pains ot Hell are According to the Greatness of the
Sin— No Redemption in Hell— State of Those who Die
Guilty of Little Sins— Sensitive Pain in Hell— Is there Fire
in Hell? etc 339-35S
CHAPTER XXVIII.
GOD.
God Known to Us by both Reason and Revelation— Nature and
Grace— Utility of Religion— Atheism, or the Denial of
God— Atheists Monstrosities of the Intellectual Order-
All Nations Believe in Some God— Interior Conscience
Tells of God— Proofs of the Existence of God— God
Eternal Truth— Mathematics— Attrjbtites of God— His
Chief Attribute— More than One God Cannot be— God
Everywhere Infinite and Unchangeable— Life, Reason and
Knowledge of God— Predestination and Free-Will— Will
of God— His Omnipotence, Justice, Mercy, etc 359-37.>
p
U.C. BERKELEY LIBRARIES
CD3fifiDlb^T