Circular

ay

SB

818
C57
ENT

8

No. 24, SECOND SERIES.

United States Department of Agriculture,
DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY.

THE TWO-LINED CHESTNUT BORER.

(Agrilus bilineatus Weber. )
RECENT DAMAGE TO FOREST GROWTH.

Recent years have witnessed extensive destruction of forest growth,
particularly of pine, spruce, and chestnut, in portions of the United
States east of the Rocky Mountains. This injury has been very
generally attributed to insects, and there is evidence that certain
wood and bark-boring species have largely contributed to the work
of demolition. The death of the chestnut trees was laid to the
account of the little buprestid borer, Agrilus bilineatus, which
forms the subject of this circular, and the destruction of the conifer-
ous trees was, in like manner, accredited to the scolytid bark-beetle,
Dendroctonus frontalis Linn.

A peculiar and interesting feature of what may be called primary
insect injury is that it was due very largely to native species not pre-
viously known to be injurious. Another singular fact is that the
invading forces disappeared as suddenly as they came, and, as is
usual in such cases, we are as ignorant of the reason for the insects’
disappearance as we are of the inducing cause. As usual also in so
many similar instances, these cases of forest-tree injuries were not
brought to the attention of entomologists until too late for thorough
investigation or experiment.

Since the year 1893 the pine-infesting species has not been reported
as injurious, and, in fact, it seems to have entirely disappeared. The
opinion has been expressed that its disappearance was due to a fungus
disease, and it is possible that such is the case. The chestnut-boring
species, however, is still living throughout its accustomed range and
in normal abundance.

PROBABILITY OF FUTURE DESTRUCTION OF TREES.

The severe wind storms that swept over the South Atlantic States
during the year 1896, particularly that of September 29, which was
the severest ever known in this region and caused very extensive
destruction of forest and shade trees, will doubtless result in still

greater destruction to trees through the opportunities that the dead,
dying, or injured trees afford for the propagation of injurious insects.
It should be borne in mind that wood and bark-boring insects gen-
erally prefer timber that has been recently killed, and that when this
is not available they will attack injured, weakened, or even healthy
growth.

It is thus quite possible that we may, within the next year or two,
hear of a similar invasion to that experienced afew years ago. As the
two-lined chestnut borer, by which name wemay know Agrilus biline-
atus, is a species very likely to cause injury in the immediate future,
it has been chosen as the subject of the present circular, and the mat-
ter here presented is, in the main, a compilation of facts published in
a former article by the writer in Bulletin No. 7, n.s., of this Division.

REPORTED INJURY TO CHESTNUT TREES.

A few of the more important instances of reported injury to chest-
nut trees may be enumerated herewith. In 1891 an instance was
reported from Botetourt County, Va., which, it is more than probable,
was due, in part, to the species in question. The following year
the two-lined chestnut borer was found to be injurious in the District
of Columbia. In 1893 serious injury was reported to the chestnut in
Fairfax County, Va., about 75 per cent of the chestnut trees, it was
estimated, having been killed by this insect in that and adjoining
counties. It was then too late for investigation looking toward reme-
dial experiment, but certain facts were gained concerning the insect
and its damage, which will be summarized under another heading.
During the same year specimens of the work of this insect in oaks
were brought to the writer’s attention from Richmond, Ill. Similarly
affected trees were noticed at the same time by Mr. G. B. Sudworth,
of the Division of Forestry of this Department, in the neighborhood
of Ann Arbor, Mich., and other cases of injury were reported by
Dr. A. D. Hopkins, entomologist of the West Virginia Agricultural
Experiment Station, in and around Madison, Wis.

PREDISPOSING CAUSES OF INJURY.

There has always been a certain degree of skepticism as to whether
perfectly healthy forest growth would, save in exceptional cases, suc-
cumb to insect attack. There is more often a predisposing agency at
work to cause a weakened condition of the trees. Whatever brought
this about in the cases reported, there is every appearance that the
insect in question multiplied in such numbers that it was forced to
attack living, if not healthy, plants or perish, as it belongs to a group
that does not develop in timber which has been dead long enough for
the bark to become separated from the wood. .

Such an enfeebled condition as suggested might be caused by bac-
terial or fungous disease; or it might be due to a variety of other

factors, among which may be numbered too close growth, defective
drainage, insufficiency or a superabundance of subterranean moist-
ure, or too great dryness; or, again, it might be produced by a dry spell
suddenly followed by an unusually wet one, or vice versa. In the
present case it seems more than probable that the soil had undergone
some change that interfered with the growth of the trees, or that a
combination of unfavorable atmospheric and soil conditions accom-
plished the supposed predisposing debility. The withering and dying
of leaves induced by a spell of
hot, dry weather following cool,
moist weather, and known as
sun scald, might be provocative
of the debilitated condition fa-
vorable to the attacks of this
borer.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSECT.

For the identification of the
beetle and its larva, the accom-
panying illustration (fig. 1) is
presented. The beetle, shown

ON ? ' : Fie. 1.—Agrilus Dilineatus: a, adult beetle; b,
at a, 18 elongate and subeylin- antenna of same; @°, claws of posterior tarsi
drical, like others of its genus. of female; <, same of male; ¢c, larva; d, pupa—
It is black, with a more or less eae EA aE RATE Se eS
greenish tinge. The sides of the
thorax and elytra are clothed with light golden-yellow pubescence,
and the elytra are each marked with a stripe of the same color. It
measures about three-eighths of an inch in length, and is fully three
times as long as wide. An enlarged antenna is shown at the left
(a), and below are the claws of the hind feet of both sexes. The
larva, drawn to the same scale as the beetle, is illustrated at c. It
is long, slender, and considerably flattened. In color it is milk white
or slightly yellowish, except the mouth-parts and the peculiar anal
fork, which are dark brown. Its length is nearly twice that of the
adult beetle. The pupa, which is white hke the larva, is shown at d.

DISTRIBUTION; TIME OF APPEARANCE.

This species is native to the United States, occurring from Maine
and Massachusetts southward to Texas and westward to the Rocky
Mountains. It will thus be seen that the species occupies what are
known as the transition, upper and lower austral life zones; but
injuries have been reported only from the upper austral zone, which
comprises a considerable portion of the most fertile and most popu-
lous parts of our country and that portion in which the chestnut
attains its highest development. The districts in which injuries have

4

been reported are in the District of Columbia and in the States
of Virginia, West Virginia, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan; but
in all probability the same species has been more or less trouble-
some in portions of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and possibly
Ohio, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Tennessee. With such a wide
distribution there would be expected a considerable variation in the
periods of appearance of the beetle according toclimate. In the lat-
itude of the District of Columbia beetles have been captured no earlier
than the last week of May, but they undoubtedly appear earher, and
farther south issue from the wood probably at least as early as April.
At Ithaca, N. Y., the writer has observed these beetles on oak from
May 26 to June 16; at Rosslyn, Va., they were noticed as late as
July 4.

NATURE OF DAMAGE AND MANNER OF WORK.

The two-lined chestnut borer works, in its larval stage, just under
the bark of the tree, making galleries which run mainly transversely
beneath the bark and which are, when completed, from 6 to 10 inches
inlength. Although none have been observed that completely encir-
cled a tree, the result, through the combined efforts of many
individuals, is practically that of girdling.

From the manner of the insect’s work it cannot be otherwise than
injurious when it occurs in excessive numbers, as it undoubtedly
stops the flow of sap, cuts off the natural supply of plant food and
moisture, and thus greatly weakens and eventually kills the tree.
The larval galleries occur from the base of the tree well up toward the
top. Itis obvious that only the earlier stage of the larva is passed
between the bark and the wood; indeed, it is likely that the entire
life of the insect may be passed, in some instances at least, entirely
within the bark.

A knowledge of the full life history of the species was not obtained,
but it is approximately as follows: In the District of Columbia the
adult beetles make their appearance in May and the early part of
June, the particular season for their appearance varying according
to season and locality, and deposit their eggs upon the trees. The
larvee work under the bark in the manner previously described, and
by the following spring construct a chamber which, as far as observed
in living trees, is always in the bark; but, in the case of small, dead
trees, they work also in the wood under the bark, and in the cells
thus formed transform into pup. The pupal stage lasts about two
weeks or more, according to locality and season, when the beetles
again issue from the trees and lay eggs for another brood.

In addition to chestnut this species infests also white oak, scarlet
oak (Quercus coccinea), and yellow oak (Q. velutina).

Or

OTHER BORERS IN CHESTNUT.

As in most cases of insect damage a considerable number of other
species of borers and bark-beetles, as well as predaceous and scay-
enging species, follow the attacks of the primary borer, whether it
be the particular species under consideration or some other form.
What may be considered as secondary species, judged by the nature
of their attack, belong chiefly to the family Cerambycids, or long-
horned beetles, but there are a few also which belong to the Bupres-
tidee, Scolytidze, and Curculionids. There are also numerous other
families of different orders represented, but it is not within the
province of this circular to consider any but the present species,
which is the one that has been the cause of the greatest injury in
recent years. Many of the secondary forms of borers, although they
do not attack or injure living trees, do considerable damage to timber
that it is desired to use for building and similar purposes.

PARASITIC ENEMIES.

The two-lined chestnut borer undoubtedly has many insect ene-
mies, as several genera of parasitic Hymenoptera are known to attack
other species of its genus. Of the parasitic species observed in this
vicinity Spathius simillimus Ashm. was the most abundant, and
is an undoubted parasite of this borer, as the circumstances of its
capture in the galleries of the boring larve indicate. It was
exceedingly abundant in the vicinity of the District of Columbia
during the latter years of the chestnut infestation, and probably
played an important role in reducing the numbers of its host. One
other parasite has been reared with this species, but it has not been
identified at the present writing.

PREVENTIVE AND REMEDIAL MEASURES.

In the absence of a more complete knowledge of the life history
and habits of this species, and of an opportunity to test the efficacy
of preventive and remedial measures against it, a somewhat general
consideration of deterrents and remedies will be given. What is of
value against the present species will apply, in the main, to many
other true borers.

After the borers once obtain possession of a tree it is next to impos-
sible to save it. Some few species of trees are able to withstand
borer attacks for years, while others succumb, unless remedies are
applied, in a year or two after the attack begins.

Large forms of boring insects, such as the round-headed apple-
tree borer and other species of Saperda, may be cut out of the wood
with a knife or may be killed by the insertion of a pliable wire into

the openings of their galleries in the bark. But this is laborious and
impracticable against small borers like Agrilus.

Our chief reliance is in preventives, in the employment of mechan-
ical precautionary measures that will serve the double purpose of
effectually deterring wood- and bark-boring insects from boring into
or depositing their eggs on the trees and from effecting their egress
through the bark once they have begun their attack, and in other
mechanical measures.

The most important requisite 1s clean culture; in fact, little of sub-
stantial value can be accomplished remedially without it. Owners
of forest land who have sufficient financial interests at stake will do
well to cut down the dead and to trim the injured trees. For the pro-
tection of chestnuts all dead oak as well as chestnut trees, and such
as are infested and too feeble to recuperate should be cleared away
and burned. Much can be accomplished by simply removing the bark
of the dead timber.

Unfortunately, in too many cases storm-killed and injured trees
are carelessly permitted to remain as a nidus for borers, and when
this wood becomes too dry and the bark too loose for the insects,
those that have bred in them emerge and migrate to neighboring
living trees.

A frequent and potent source of injury is in the almost universal
custom of permitting cut or sawed timber to season without remov-
ing the bark, a custom followed alike by the forest landholder, the
general farmer, and the mill owner. Even the family woodpile may
become a center of infestation. Wood that is cut during winter
becomes infested the following spring and early summer, and when
left to season through the summer and autumn months should be
consumed or otherwise disposed of before the following April. <A
few cords of wood may develop enough boring insects in a single
season to infest and injure acres of woodland. Another source of
infestation is in carelessness in permitting dead trees to come in con-
tact with living trees and in bruising or otherwise injuring healthy
growth.

The progeny of insects that deposit their eggs in one season so
loosen the bark that it may easily be removed and burned before the
following spring, thus destroying millions of the insects before they
have an opportunity to issue and lay their eggs for the destruction of
valuable trees.

In Kurope it is customary for foresters to girdle a few trees here
and there and leave them standing as traps for such beetles as may
not have been destroyed with their host trees, These trees in turn
are decorticated the following year and others treated in like manner
should appearances indicate the advisability of this course.

Another remedy, rarely if ever used on a large scale and one that
does not find favor except for the protection of very valuable shade
or fruit trees, consists in a mixture of clay and cow manure spread
thickly over the trunk and larger branches; and this may be held
in place with newspapers wrapped about the trunks and larger
branches. Newspapers alone or tarred paper also give protection.
These and similar measures effectually deter boring species from issuing
from the trees or laying their eggs upon them. The covering may
be removed as soon as the danger has passed, toward the end of July
in most cases, this date varying somewhat with the locality and the
species of borers which it is desired to guard against. Lighter appli-
cations of other mixtures serve the same purpose.

A wash of lime, to which a small quantity of Paris green or other
arsenical mixture and a sufficient amount of glue to make it adhesive
have been added, is a valuable deterrent, as are also a wash consisting
of soft soap reduced to the consistency of thick paint by the addition
of a solution of washing soda in water, and a thick wash of soap,
plaster of Paris, and Paris green. These washes are best colored like
the bark of the tree and this may be accomplished by the addition of
a little lamp or bone black. Fish oil is also a valuable deterrent.

Inrecent years a German product, manufactured from crude petro-
leum and know as ‘‘raupenleim”, insect lime, or caterpillar lime,
has come into use as a protective remedy against injurious forest-tree
insects, and has been the subject of experiment against certain borers
affecting fruit trees. This preparation is of nearly the same color and
consistency as oil blacking, and has a greasy, tarry odor.

A very similar American product has been lately placed on the
market under the name of ‘‘dendrolene”, and has proved of value
against fruit borers that work in a somewhat similar manner to the
species in question.

These insect limes must be used with considerable caution, partic-
ularly when applied to young trees; since if applied too thickly they
are apt to retard the growth and kill the trees. They may be applied
with a trowel or paddle and distributed with a stiff brush. The
preparation is viscid in character, and, being a mineral product, does
not become rancid. A thin application sufficient to retard the beetles
from ovipositing on the trunks will last about six weeks; a thicker
quantity, or enough to prevent the newly bred insects from emerging
through the bark, will endure a much longer time.

Raupenleim may be obtained of the importers in New York City
at wholesale in 25 to 250 pound kegs or barrels at the rate of 10 to 15
cents a pound, and dendrolene may be purchased of the manufac-
turers in New Brunswick, N. J., at about 6 cents.

INSTITUTION LIBRARIES

AAA

3 9088 01272 6824

Whatever is used should be applied for most species just before the

first warm spell of spring. At the very outset of an attack a very
thin application of kerosene, kerosene emulsion, or creosote by lightly
brushing or spraying it over the infested parts, would kill the beetles
with which it came in contact.

Protective measures against the two-lined chestnut borer should
begin about the first of May in the latitude of the District of Columbia
and a little later in more northern and colder localities.

F. H. CHITTENDEN,
Assistant Entomologist.
Approved :
JAMES WILSON,
Secretary.
WASHINGTON, D. C., July 14, 1897.

=)

ae