Skip to main content

Full text of "Comparison of effects of various tropical storms on the vertical temperature structure of the ocean using pictorial representation."

See other formats


COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  VARIOUS 
TROPICAL  STORMS  ON  THE  VERTICAL 
TEMPERATURE  STRUCTURE  OF  THE  OCEAN 
USING  PICTORIAL  REPRESENTATION 


Wi 1 1 iam  Revesz,  Jr. 


* 

* 


United    States 
Naval  Postgraduate  School 


THESIS 


COMPARISON  OF  EFFECTS  OF  VARIOUS 
TROPICAL  STORMS  ON  THE  VERTICAL 
TEMPERATURE  STRUCTURE  OF  THE  OCEAN 
USING  PICTORIAL  REPRESENTATION 


by 


William  Revesz  ,  J  r 


Thes  is  Advisor: 


Dr.  Dale  F .  Lei  ppe  r 


September  1971 


T14251 


Approved  faon.  pub  tic  nzlzaHiZ;   distribution  witimitzd. 


Comparison  of  Effects  of  Various  Tropical  Storms  on  the 
Vertical  Temperature  Structure  of  the  Ocean 

Using 
Pictorial  Representation 


by 


William  Revesz,  Jr. 
Lieutenant  Commander.  United  States  Navy 
B.S.,  University  of  Tulsa,  1 96 2 


Submitted  in  partial  fulfillment  of  the 
requirements  for  the  degree  of 


MASTER  OF  SCIENCE  IN  OCEANOGRAPHY 


from  the 


NAVAL  POSTGRADUATE  SCHOOL 
September  1971 


c.i 


ABSTRACT 


To  make  comparisons  of  the  effects  of  tropical  storms  on 
the  ocean's  vertical  temperature  structure,  temperature-depth 
c ross -sect i ons  were  constructed  using  bathythermograph  data 
and  data  from  published  articles. 

Upwelling,  downwelling  and  m i x i ng , caused  by  tropical 
storms  in  deep  and  shallow  water, are  analyzed  and  compared. 
For  a  slow-moving,  intense  and  very  intense  tropical  storm, 
upwelling,  from  a  depth  of  kO    to  65  meters,  is  observed  within 
the  radius  of  hurricane-force  winds.   Downwelling  as  much  as 
20  meters  occurs  from  45  to  110  nmi  from  the  path  of  the  storm. 
This  compares  favorably  with  the  theoretical  results  of 
O'Brien  and  Reid.   A  fast-moving,  intense  tropical  storm  has  a 
similar  effect  on  the  vertical  temperature  structure  if  the 
thermocline  is  shallow,and  upwelling,  of  a  lessor  degree  than 
that  caused  by  a  slower-moving  storm,  can  occur  from  a  depth 
of  35  meters  within  the  radius  of  h u r r i cane- f o r ce  winds.   A 
very  fast-moving,  very  intense  tropical  storm  can  cause  up- 
welling from  a  depth  of  30  meters  if  the  thermocline  is  shallow 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

I.  INTRODUCTION 9 

II.  PROCESSING  OF  DATA 11 

A.  STEP  ONE 11 

B.  STEP  TWO 12 

C.  STEP  THREE 13 

D.  STEP  FOUR 14 

III.  ANALYSIS  OF  TROPICAL  STORMS 17 

A.  CROSS-SECTION  A-A1 18 

B.  CROSS-SECTION  D-D' 19 

IV.  COMPARISON  OF  FIGURES 22 

A.  EFFECTS  IN  DEEP  WATER 22 

1.  Upwelling 22 

2.  Downwelling 23 

3.  Mixing 2k 

k.       Sea  Surface  Temperature 2k 

B.  EFFECTS  IN  SHALLOW  WATER 2k 

1  .   Upwel  ling 2k 

2.  Downwelling 25 

3.  Mixing 25 

k.       Sea  Surface  Temperature 25 

V.  COMPARISON  WITH  THEORY 27 

A.  SLOW-MOVING,  INTENSE  AND  VERY  INTENSE 

TROPICAL  STORM 30 

B.  FAST-MOVING,  INTENSE  TROPICAL  STORM 31 


C.   VERY  FAST-MOVING,  VERY  INTENSE  TROPICAL 

STORM 32 

VI.  CONCLUSIONS 33 

VII.  RECOMMENDATIONS 3k 

APPENDIX  A--Cruise  Track  Used  by  GUS  III  for  AFTER 

Hilda  (196*0 35 

LIST  OF  REFERENCES 51 

INITIAL  DISTRIBUTION  LIST 53 

FORM  DD  H73 55 


LIST  OF  TABLES 


Table 

I 


Characteristics  of  the  Tropical 
Storms,  the  Results  of  Analysis,  and 
the  Predictions  of  Theory 


Page 


50 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 


Figure 

1 


8 

9a 
9b 
9c 
9d 
10a 


Cruise  Track  Used  by  GUS  III  for  AFTER 
Hi  Ida  (1964) 

An  Example  of  the  Construction  of  the 
Figures  Used  for  Analysis 

Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS  for 
UNDISTURBED  Hilda  (1964)  and  BEFORE 
Betsy  (1965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico 

Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS  for 
AFTER  Betsy  (1965),  and  Location  of 
Cross-sections  C-C"  through  G-G" 

Position  of  C ros s -sect i ons  A- A"  and 
B-B"  across  the  Track  of  Betsy  (1965) 
with  Location  of  Rad i o- t ransm i t ted  BT ■ s 

Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  HIDALGO  for 
Thermistor-Chain  Tows  of  BEFORE  and 
AFTER  Carla  ( 1 9 6 1 )  and  Location  of 
Cross-section  A-A' 

Cruise  Track  used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS 
for  BEFORE  and  AFTER  Inez  (1 966)  and 
Location  of  Cross-section  A-A' 

Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ATLANTIS  II 
for  BEFORE  and  AFTER  Shirley  (1965) 
and  Location  of  C ros s -sect i on  A-A1 

Temperature-Depth  C ros s -sec t i on  A-A', 
UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  Hilda  (1964) 

Temperature-Depth  C ros s -sec t i on  B-B1, 
UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  Hilda  (1964) 

Temperature-Depth  C ros s -  sect i on  C-C1, 
UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  Hilda  (1964) 

Tempe ra tu re- Dept h  C ros s -  sec t i on  D-D1, 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Hilda  (1964) 

Temperature-Depth  C ros s -  sec t i on  A-A", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  (1965),  Based 
on  Rad i o- t ransm i t ted  Data 


Page 
35 
36 

37 

38 

39 


40 

41 

42 
43 
43 
44 
44 

45 


Fl  gure 


Page 


10b      Temperature-Depth  Cross-section  B-B", 

BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  (1965),  Based  on 
Radio-transmitted  Data ^5 

11a      Temperature-Depth  Cross-section  C-C", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  Cl 965)  in  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico ^6 

lib      Temperature-Depth  Cross-section  D-D", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  (1965)  in  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico Zj£ 

lie      Temperature-Depth  Cross-section  E-E", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  (1965)  in  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico ^7 

lid      Tempe ra tu re- Dep th  Cross-section  F-F", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  ( 1 965 )  in  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico 47 

lie      Tempe ra ture - Dept h  Cross-section  G-G", 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Betsy  (1965)  in  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico 43 

12  Temperature-Depth  cross-section  A -A", 

BEFORE  and  AFTER  Shirley  (1965) k8 

13  Temper  a tu re- Dep th  C ros s -sect i on  A-A1, 
BEFORE  and  AFTER  Carla  (1961), 

Based  on  Towed  The rm i s te r-Cha i n  Data....     l±q 

1  *»       Tempe  ra  tu  re- Dep  th  C  ros  s  -  sec  t  i  on  A-A1, 

BEFORE  and  AFTER  Inez  (  1  966 ) ^9 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 


I  would  like  to  express  my  sincere  appreciation  to 
Dr.  Dale  F.  Leipper  for  the  patience,  personal  interest,  and 
encouragement  he  provided  in  the  preparation  of  this  thesis. 

I  would  also  like  to  thank  Professor  Ken  Davidson  for 
his  encouragement  and  constructive  criticism. 

A  special  thank  you  to  my  friend  Patti  Povemba ,  who  spent 
many  hours  typing  and  retyping. 


INTRODUCTION 


Emphasis  on  the  study  of  the  effects  on  the  sea  surface 
and  vertical  temperature  structure  of  the  ocean  by  the  pass- 
age of  a  tropical  storm  began  in  the  mid  1950's.   Evidence 
of  marked  cooling  of  the  sea  surface  following  the  passage  of 
tropical  storms  has  been  reported  by  several  authors.   These 
include  Uda  [19S4],  Fisher  [1958],  Jordan  [1964],  Leipper 
[1967],  Stevenson  and  Armstrong  [1965],  Landis  and  Leipper 
[1968],  and  Hazelworth  [1968]  . 

The  first  systematic  observational  studies  on  the 
three-dimensional  effect  of  a  hurricane  on  the  sea  sur- 
face and  vertical  temperature  structure  were  conducted  by 
Leipper  on  the  effects  of  hurricane  Hilda,  (1964).   Further 
studies  were  conducted  by  Landis  and  Leipper,  and 
Franceschini  and  El-Sayed  on  hurricanes  Betsy  (1965)  and 
Inez  (1966),  respectively. 

A  theory  for  oceanic  changes  due  to  a  stationary 
or  slow-moving  hurricane  was  developed  by  O'Brien 
and  Reid  [196?];   and  O'Brien  [1967,  1968].   Although 
somewhat  limited  by  assumptions,  the  theory  provides 
an  explanation  of  some  of  the  time-dependent  non-linear 
processes  involved.   Basically,  the  initial  ocean 
response  to  a  hurricane  is  a  development  of  an  Ekman  type 
flow  which,  in  the  Northern  Hemisphere,  leads  to  a  diver- 
gence of  the  ocean  surface  layers  away  from  the  storm.   The 


outward  flowing  warm  water  converges  near  the  outer  edges  of 
the  wind  circulation  and  leads,  through  downwelling,  to  the 
formation  of  a  deep,  still  warm,  well-mixed  layer  in  the  ocean 
The  mechanical  effect  of  the  wind  and  the  convection  brought 
about  by  heat  loss  from  the  sea  surface  to  the  atmosphere 
causes  the  mixing  which  occurs  in  the  outward  moving  water. 
Near  a  coastline,  the  wind-induced  motions  are  modified  by 
the  presence  of  a  solid  boundary,  Franceschini  and  El-Sayed 
[1968]. 

To  date,  only  Fisher  [1958]  and  Hazelworth  [1968]  have 
concerned  themselves  with  a  comparison  of  the  effect  of  more 
than  one  hurricane  or  typhoon.   Both  used  sea  surface  temper- 
ature (SST)  as  the  basic  comparison  parameter.   The  objective 
of  this  paper  is  to  analyze  and  compare  by  use  of  selected 
numerical  indices  and  pictorial  representation,  the  effects 
on  the  vertical  temperature  structure  of  the  ocean  produced 
by  hurricanes  Carla  (1961),  Hilda  (1964),  Betsy  (1965),  Inez 
(1966)  and  typhoon  Shirley  (1965). 


10 


I  I .   PROCESSING  OF  DATA 

Leipper  [1967],  in  his  study  of  hurricane  Hilda  (1964), 
made  observations  and  displayed  vertical  sections  perpendicular 
to  the  hurricane's  path.   Comparison  with  data  collected 
before  the  storm  and  with  UNDISTURBED  cros s -sect i ons  (obtained 
during  the  next  hurricane  season  prior  to  the  passage  of  any 
storms  and  along  the  same  cruise  track  lines)  showed  signifi- 
cant d  i  ffe  ren  ces  in  temperature  and  salinity.   These  differences 
appeared  to  be  the  result  of  the  storm's  action  on  the  ocean. 
The  warm  surface  waters  were  displaced  to  either  side  of  the 
hurricane's  path  and  a  core  of  cold  water  with  a  shallow  therm- 
ocline  appeared  near  the  center  of  the  wake,  demonstrating 
active  upwelling.   The  Hilda  study  and  further  studies  by 
Leipper  ,  prior  to  and  following  Betsy  (1965),  indicated  an 
area  of  downwelling  outside  the  central  upwelling  region. 

This  investigation  and  pictorial  comparison  of  the  effect 
of  various  tropical  storms  on  the  vertical  temperature  struc- 
ture of  the  ocean  was  initiated  using  the  observations  of 
Leipper  [ 1 9  6  7 ]  .   A  method  of  pictorial  representation 
to  represent  the  areas  of  upwelling  and  downwelling  of 
Hilda  0964),  was  selected  as  follows: 

A.   STEP  ONE 

The  locations  of  all  bathythermograph  (BT)  observations 
made  AFTER  Hilda  and  all  BT  observations  made  of  the 


To  be  published. 


1  1 


UNDISTURBED  condition  were  plotted  on  the  same  chart  of  the 
Gulf  of  Mexico.   The  track  of  Hilda  was  superimposed  over 
this  data.   Cross-sectional  lines,  perpendicular  to  the 
hurricane's  track,  were  drawn   with  respect  to  the  ship's 
track.   For  Hurricane  Hilda,  the  placement  of  the  cross- 
sectional  lines  was  simplified  because  the  AFTER  and 
UNDISTURBED  cruise  tracks  were  made  normal  to  the  hurricane's 
track  for  both  the  first  (AFTER  )  and  second  (UNDISTURBED) 
cruises.   In  the  case  of  Betsy  in  the  Gulf  ,  the  BEFORE  and 
AFTER  plots  of  BT  stations  were  overlaid.   Three  of  the 
AFTER  lines  had  been  made  exactly  along  the  BEFORE  lines. 
The  other  two  c ros s -sec t i ona 1  lines  were  drawn  normal  to  the 
path  of  the  hurricane  through  the  area  of  greatest  observa- 
tional density  except  for  c ros s -sec t i ons  D-D"  and  E-E". 
All  observations  not  falling  directly  on  the  cross- 
sectional  lines  were  projected  normal  to  the  cross- 
sectional  line.   An  example  of  the  method  of  plotting  the 
BT  stations  to  the  c ros s -sect i ona 1  lines  is  shown  in  Figure  1, 
which  corresponds  to  the  study  of  Hilda. 

B.   STEP  TWO 

To  further  refine  the  pictorial  representation  of  the 
UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  vertical  temperature  structure,  each 


Hurricane  Betsy  will  hereafter  be  identified  as 
Betsy  in  the  Gulf  or  Betsy,  the  latter  referring  to 
hurricane  Betsy  in  the  Atlantic. 


12 


BT  observation  for  the  AFTER  data  was  plotted  with  a 
vertical  scale  of  50  meters/inch.   A  horizontal  scale  of 
60  nautical  miles/inch  was  used  to  represent  the  distance 
from  the  path  of  the  hurricane  with  the  zero  position 
representing  the  center  of  the  hurricane  path.   Each 
BT  observation  was  plotted  at  its  respective  distance  from 
the  center  of  the  hurricane  path  and  isotherms  were 
connected  between  observations  to  form  a  temperature  cross- 
section.   A  similar  method  was  used  to  plot  sections  for 
the  UNDISTURBED  BT  observations  at  their  respective 
distances  from  the  center  of  the  hurricane's  path. 

C.   STEP  THREE 

The  plot  of  the  UNDISTURBED  isotherms  was  overlaid  on 
the  plot  of  the  AFTER  isotherms  using  the  zero  nautical  mile 
position  and  the  sea  surface  as  the  common  points  of  allign- 
ment.   With  the  vertical  scales  being  the  same,  areas  of 
upwelling,  downwelling  and  mixing  were  readily  discerned  by 
comparing  equal  valued  isotherms.   To  construct  a  pictorial 
representation  of  the  effects  of  the  hurricane  for  use  in 
comparisons  to  other  storms,  the  following  procedure  was 
used.   With  the  AFTER  plot  overlaid  on  the  UNDISTURBED  plot, 
isotherms  of  the  same  value  were  compared  starting  from  the 
surface.   The  lower  stable  isotherm  was  selected  to  serve 
as  a  reference  for  changes  in  the  vertical  temperature 
structure;  that  is,  the  isotherm  was  chosen  as  one  which 
maintained  the  same  depth  within  the  area  of  upwelling  both 


13 


In  the  AFTER  and  UNDISTURBED  plot.   Examination  of  the 
isotherms  above  this  chosen  lower  reference  isotherm 
showed  that  an  isotherm  for  a  2°C  greater  temperature 
would  adequately  aid  in  representing  depth  changes  due  to 
the  processes  involved.   In  the  case  of  Hilda,  the  lower 
and  upper  isotherms  were  23°C  and  25°C,  respectively. 
Examination  of  the  UNDISTURBED  plot  of  isotherms  indicated 
that  the  layer  of  water  contained  between  these  two 
isotherms,  differing  by  2°C,  describes  a  layer  with 
generally  uniform  thickness  in  the  undisturbed  water. 
In  the  case  of  Betsy  (in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico)  this  index 
layer  was  best  represented  by  the  layer  contained  between 
the  26°C  and  28°C  isotherms.   Henceforth,  such  layers 
contained  between  the  two  chosen  isotherms  will  be  referred 
to  as  the  index  layer. 

D.   STEP  FOUR 

The  final  construction  of  the  figures  used  for  Hilda  and 
Betsy  for  pictorial  representation  was  accomplished  in  the 

following  manner.   Dashed  lines  ( )  were  chosen  to 

represent  the  UNDISTURBED  or  BEFORE  condition.   Solid  lines 

( )  were  chosen  to  represent  the  AFTER  condition.   When 

additional  isotherms  were  needed  to  more  clearly  show  the 
processes  involved,  a  dash-dot  line  (-.-.)  was  chosen  to 
represent  the  BEFORE  or  UNDISTURBED  condition  and  a 

dotted  line  C )  was  chosen  to  represent  the  AFTER 

condition.   Large  dots  occurring  in  any  of  the  above  lines 


\k 


represent  the  location  of  BT  stations  as  measured 
horizontally  from  the  path  of  the  hurricane  and  the  depth 
of  the  isotherm  as  measured  vertically  from  the  surface. 
An  example  of  this  representation  appears  in  Figure  2.   The 
completed  figures  were  then  labeled  and  they  represent 
simplified  views  of  the  temperature-depth  c ros s -sec t i on s 
chosen  for  analysis  and  comparison. 

To  construct  figures  for  analysis  of  tropical  storms 
Betsy  (1965),  Shirley  (1965),  Carla  (1961),  and  Inez  (1966, 
results  representing  the  BEFORE  and  AFTER  isothermal 
structure  were  extracted  from  published  articles  by 
Landis  and  Leipper  [1968],  Wright  [  1  9 6 9 J  ,  Stevenson  and 
Armstrong  [1.965],  and  Franceshini  and  El-Sayed  [1968].   A 
search  of  literature  showed  that  these  articles  contained 
suitable  results  for  comparison.   These  results  were 
presented  In  figures  similar  to  those  constructed  in  this 
study.   The  figures  were  modified  so  that  the  depth  scale 
would  be  one  inch  per  50  meters  and  correspond  to  the  depth 
scale  used  in  the  Hilda  and  Betsy  (in  the  Gulf)  analyses. 
The  horizontal  distance  scale  assumed  the  dimensions  per  inch 
created  by  the  one  to  one  enlargement  of  the  published  data. 
This  enabled  a  direct  comparison  of  changes  in  the  thickness 
caused  by  upwelling,  downwelling  and  mixing  of  the  index 
layer.   After  the  modification  of  the  published  figures, 
steps  three  and  four  were  completed  and  the  figures  were 
used  to  compare  the  depth  changes  involved.   To  facilitate 


15 


ease  in  comparison,  all  depths  are  presented  in  meters, 
distances  in  nautical  miles,  and  temperatures  in  degrees 
Celsius.   The  final  pictorial  representations  used  for 
comparison  were  not  meant  to  give  exact  values  of  horizontal 
measurement  such  as  the  exact  distances  where  upwelling 
or  downwelling  occurs  on  either  side  of  the  hurricane's 
path.   The  isotherms  chosen  were  representative  isotherms 
and  show  approximate  distances  to  the  most  dominant  features 
The  vertical  pictorial  representation  indicates  the  change 
in  depth  and  thickness  of  the  index  layer  due  to  the  effect 
of  the  hurricane  on  the  vertical  temperature  structure. 
The  isotherms  for  Hilda,  and  Betsy  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico, 
were  plotted  within  +  one  meter  of  their  true  depth  on  the 
BT  graph  or  on  the  value  on  the  NODC  data  printout.   There- 
fore, the  vertical  scale  represents  the  actual  change  in 
depth  and  thickness  of  the  index  layer.   The  accuracy  of 
the  vertical  scale  of  Betsy  ,  Carla,  Shirley  and  Inez, 
was  assumed  to  be  the  same  since  original  data  was  not  used 
to  plot  i  sothe  rms . 

Section  III  explains  in  detail  the  construction  of  each 

temperature-depth  c ros s -  sec t i on .   Analysis  of  a  sample  cross 

t 
section  is  included.   Section  IV  is  a  comparison  of  the 

figures,  and  Section  Visa  comparison  of  the  results  of  the 

pictorial  analysis  with  the  theoretical  model  proposed  by 

O'Brien  [1968]. 


16 


III.   ANALYSIS  OF  TROPICAL  STORMS 

Figures  1,  3  and  k    show  the  cruise  track,  cross- 
sections,  and  the  extent  of  hurricane  force  winds  of 
hurricanes  Hilda  [1964)  and  Betsy  (1965)  in  the  Gulf  of 
Mexico.   Figures  5,  6,  7  and  8  show  the  same  information 
for  tropical  storms  Betsy  (1965),  Shirley  (1965),Carla  (1961), 
and  Inez  (1966),  respectively.   Figures  9  through  14  are 
tempe ra t u re -dept h  c ros s -sec t i ons  of  each  tropical  storm.   Each 
cross-section  was  constructed  normal  to  the  path  of  that  storm 
with  the  exception  of  c ros s -  sec t i on s  D-D"  and  E-E"  of  Betsy 
in  the  Gulf  and  A-A'  of  Shirley.   Each  temperature-depth 
c ros s -  sec t i on  was  analyzed  using  the  same  procedures.   The 
following  is  a  sample  analysis  of  Hilda  (1964).   The  analysis 
examines  two  situations;  first,  a  hurricane's  effect  on  the 
vertical  temperature  structure  in  deep  water,  (c ros s -  sec t i on 
A-A');  and  second,  the  effect  on  the  vertical  temperature 
structure  in  shallow  water  (c ros s -  sec t i on  D-D1): 

The  path  of  hurricane  Hilda  as  it  crossed  the  Gulf  of 
Mexico  from  30  September  to  4  October  1964,  is  shown  in 
Figure  1.   When  the  hurricane  was  centered  250  nmi  off  shore 
in  waters  greater  than  1,000  fathoms,  she  became  more  intense 
with  winds  up  to  130  knots.   The  wind  decreased  to  105  knots 
as  she  moved  toward  the  coast.   The  width  of  the  zone  having 
winds  of  hurricane  force  is  shown  in  Figure  1.   The  average 
propagation  speed  was  six  to  eight  knots,  and  the  width  of 
the  eye  was  approximately  35  nmi  in  the  northern  Gulf. 


17 


The  data  for  the  analysis  was  gathered  in  three 
ways.   Some  BEFORE  data  was  collected  by  RV/ALAMINOS  as  it 
proceeded  into  port  just  ahead  of  the  hurricane.   Three  bathy 
thermograph  (BT)  observations  were  made  near  the  locations 
of  BT ■ s  26,  21,  and  18,  respectively,  as  shown  in  Figure  1. 
Three  additional  BEFORE  BT  observations  were  obtained  from 
the  Bureau  of  Commercial  Fisheries  at  locations  near  those 
indicated  for  BT's  57.  63,  and  65  as  shown  in  Figure  1.   The 
remaining  data  was  collected  on  cruise  65~A-11,  conducted  by 
the  RV/ALAMINOS  from  1 0 - 2 ^  August  1 9 6 5  and  represents  the 
UNDISTURBED  condition  taken  eleven  months  later.   Data  was 
taken  over  the  same  paths  used  for  observations  of  conditions 
after  Hilda.   The  AFTER  data  was  gathered  using  the  90-foot 
shrimp  boat,  GUS  lil,  operated  by  the  Galveston  Biological 
Laboratory,  Bureau  of  Commercial  Fisheries.   The  observations 
after  the  storm  were  made  using  the  same  BT  instruments  used 
on  the  RV/ALAMINOS. 

A.   CROSS-SECTION  A-A'  (See  Figure  1  for  Location) 

The  UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  data  are   plotted  in  Figure  3a, 
with  all  stations  projected  to  the  baseline  A-A',  constructed 
normal  to  and  centered  around  Hilda's  path.   UNDISTURBED  data 
was  selected  for  analysis  from  hydrographic  stations  two 
through  eight  and  NODC  data  printouts  of  BT's  kO    through  69, 
gathered  on  cruise  65-A-ll.   AFTER  data  was  selected  from 
photographs  of  BT's  25  through  41,  gathered  5  days  after 
HMda  by  GUS  III. 


18 


The  UNDISTURBED  condition  was  represented  by  the  index 
layer  contained  between  the  23 'C  and  25  °C  isotherms.   The 
thickness  of  the  index  layer, 60  nmi  either  side  of  the  path 
of  Hilda,  indicated  a  uniform,  undisturbed  layer  approximately 
10  meters  thick,  with  the  uppermost  part  of  the  index  layer 
being  50  meters  below  the  surface. 

The  AFTER  condition  was  represented  by  the  same  pair  of 
isotherms.   As  a  result  of  the  radial  divergence  of  the  sur- 
face water,  colder  water  was  upwelled  from  the  index  layer 
to  the  surface  for  a  distance  of  k$    nmi  to  the  left  and  50  nmi 
to  the  right  of  Hilda's  path  as  shown  by  the  surfacing  of  the 
25°C  isotherm.   A  reduction  of  SST  by  3°C  in  this  area  was 
observed   by  comparing  the  UNDISTURBED  and  AFTER  BT  readings. 
Beyond  60  nmi  to  the  left  and  right  of  Hilda's  path  there  were 
strong  indications  of  downwelling,  probably  caused  by  con- 
vergence of  the  warm  surface  water  displaced  from  the  area 
of  up welling.   In  these  areas  the  25  °C  isotherm  was  depressed 
approximately  18  meters  deeper  than  the  observed  UNDISTURBED 
position.   At  a  distance  greater  than  120  nmi  to  the  right  of 
Hilda's  path,  steeply  sloping  isotherms  were  observed  and  are 
believed  to  be  caused  by  horizontal  advection  toward  the 
hurricane  path,  Leipper  [1965].    * 

B.   CROSS-SECTION  D-D1 

The  BEFORE  and  AFTER  data  are  plotted  in  Figure  9d,  with 
all  stations  projected  to  baseline  D-D',  which  is  normal 
to  and  centered  to  the  far  left  of  Hilda's  path.   BEFORE  data 
was  selected  from  BT ' s  10,  5  and  2,  obtained  by  the  Bureau 


19 


of  Commercial  Fisheries  in  40  fathoms  of  water.   AFTER  data 
was  selected  from  photographs  of  BT ' s  57  through  65,  gathered 
nine  days  after  Hilda  by  GUS  III.   This  represents  an  area 
where  Hilda  reached  shallow  water  and  the  wind-induced  motions 
were  modified  by  the  presence  of  a  coastline. 

The  BEFORE  condition  was  represented  by  the  index  layer 
defined  by  the  23°C  and  25°C  isotherms.   The  thickness 
of  the  index  layer  from  120  nmi  to  the  left  and  30  nmi  to  the 
right  of  Hilda's  path  represents  a  uniform,  undisturbed 
layer  averaging  10  meters  thick,  with  the  uppermost  part  of 
the  index  layer  being  about  kO    meters  below  the  surface. 

The  AFTER  condition  was  represented  by  the  same  pair  of 
isotherms.   As  a  result  of  the  radial  divergence  of  the  sur- 
face water,  colder  water  was  upwelled  from  the  index  layer  to 
the  surface  for  a  distance  of  20  nmi  to  **0  nmi  to  the  left  of 
Hilda's  path  as  shown  by  the  surfacing  of  the  25°C  isotherm. 
A  reduction   of  SST  in  this  area  of  5°C  was  indicated  by 
comparing  BEFORE  and  AFTER  BT ' s .   Seventy  nautical  miles  to 
the  left  of  Hilda's  path  there  were  strong  indications  of 
downwelling,  probably  caused  by  convergence  of  warm  surface 
water  displaced  from  the  area  of  upwelling.   In  this  area, 
the  25°C  isotherm  is  depressed  approximately  10  meters 
deeper  than  the  observed  BEFORE  position.   From  110  nmi 
to  the  left  and  10  nmi  to  the  right  of  Hilda's  path,  large 
areas  of  mixing  were  indicated  by  the  equal  distribution 
of  the  index  layer  above  and  below  the  BEFORE  data  position. 


20 


The  data  obtained  from  the  analysis  of  all  of  the 
temperature-depth  cross-sections  prepared  in  this  way  is 
summarized  in  Table  1. 


21 


IV.   COMPARISON  OF  FIGURES 

The  comparison  of  figures  is  considered  in  two  parts: 
hurricane  effects  in  deep  water  and  hurricane  effects  in 
shallow  water.   In  each  part,  comparisons  are  made  of  upwell- 
ing,  downwelling,  mixing,  sea-surface  temperature  decrease, 
and  the  extent  of  winds  of  hurricane  force. 

A.   EFFECTS  IN  DEEP  WATER: 
1 .    Upwe 1 1  ?  ng 

As  a  result  of  radial  divergence  of  the  surface 
water  in  all  directions,  sub-surface  water  is  usually 
upwelled  to  compensate  for  the  initial  loss  at  the  surface. 
O'Brien  [1970]  shows  that  the  upwelling  is  a  result  of  the 
influence  of  the  radial  component  of  wind  stress.   The 
component  of  wind  stress  was  viewed  as  a  steady  state 
component  by  O'Brien,  which  enabled  him  to  adequately  describe 
the  ocean  dynamics  under  the  core  of  the  hurricane. 

Table  1  shows  the  comparison  of  the  various  cyclonic 
disturbances.   In  each  case,  the  area  immediately  beneath  the 
path  of  the  hurricane  was  upwelled  from  a  depth  of  at  least 
kO    meters  to  the  surface.   This  is  demonstrated  by  the  surfac- 
ing of  the  upper  portion  of  the  chosen  index  layer.   Currents 
have  also  had  an  effect  on  the  observed  location  of  the  upwelled 
water.   This  is  demonstrated  in  cros s -sec t i ons  C-C",  D-D",  and 
E-E"  of  Betsy  (in  the  Gulf).   In  the  upwelled  area,  the  chosen 
lower  isotherm  has  remained  essentially  stable.   This 


22 


indicates  that  water  is  brought  in  from  below  the  mixed  sur- 
face layer  probahly  causing  a  decrease  in  thickness  of  the 
index  layer  in  areas  near  the  outer  limits  of  the  hurricane 
force  winds.   Most  cross^sect ions  studied  exhibited  upwelling 
beneath  the  path  of  the  storm  and  were  offset  to  the  left 
of  the  path  of  the  storm  as  shown  in  cross-sections  A-A1, 
B-B',  C-C,  D-D'  of  Hilda;  B-B",  C-C",  D-D",  F-F"  of  Betsy 
Cin  the  Gulf);  A-A'  of  Shirley;  A-A'  of  Carla;  and  A-A1  of 
Inez.   The  upwelling  effect  is  a  lasting  effect,  with 
indications,  in  at  least  the  Hilda  case,  that  it  may  last 
for  up  to  twenty  days. 
2  .    Downwe 1  1  i  ng 

As  a  result  of  the  radial  divergence  of  the  surface 
waters  from  the  storm  centers,  still  warm  water  displaced  from 
the  upwelled  area  converges  near  the  outer  area  of  the  wind 
stress  component.   Leipper  in  his  study  of  Hilda,  and  Betsy 
(in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico)  found  that  downwelling  was  signifi- 
cant outside  the  upwelled  area.   Table  1  shows  that  an  area 
of  downwelling  occurs  near  the  outer  edge  of  hurricane  force 
winds  which  would  agree  with  the  onset  of  downwelling  as 
described  in  theory  by  O'Brien  [1967]-   The  mechanisms 
involved  in  downwelling  are    not  as  simple  as  those  occurring 
directly  beneath  the  hurricane  and  downwelling  cannot  be 
treated  with  the  simple  dynamic  steady-state  model  used  for 
upwelling.    A   common  effect  in  the  downwelled  areas  was  a 
decrease  in  the  thickness  of  the  index  layer  and  an  increase 
in  the  depth  of  the  index  layer. 


23 


3 .   Mixing 

As  a  result  of  the  radial  divergence  of  the  surface 
water  from  the  upwelled  area  and  the  combined  effect  of  wind 
stress  and  turbulence  in  the  diverging  surface  water,  areas 
of  deep,  well-mixed  waters  are  often  encountered  inside  the 
storm  area,    and  usually  in  concurrence  with  areas  of 
maximum  downwelling.   An  area  of  mixing  is  easily  recognized 
by  equal  displacement  of  the  upper  and  lower  isotherm, 
thickening  the  BEFORE  or  UNDISTRUBED  index  layer.   Mixing  was 
not  a  common  occurrence  in  deep  water,  but  will  be  discussed 
in  greater  detail  under  EFFECTS  IN  SHALLOW  WATER. 

k .   Sea  Surface  Temperature 

A  decrease  in  sea  surface  temperature  was  observed 
in  the  wake  of  each  hurricane,  and  has  been  noted  by  many 
authors.   The  amount  of  decrease  of  sea  surface  temperatures 
is  dependent  upon  the  conditions  existing  prior  to  passage, 
the  speed  of  passage,  and  the  intensity  of  the  cyclonic 
disturbance.   The  total  decrease  in  the  SST  can  not  always 
be  attributed  to  the  effect  of  upwelling,  but  may  be  the 
result  of  heat  loss  to  the  hurricane,  if  no  upwelling  occurred 

B.   EFFECTS  IN  SHALLOW  WATER: 
1  .   U  pwe 1  1  i  ng 

Three  c ros s -sect i on s  demonstrate  that  the 
decrease  in  ocean  depth  and  the  presence  of  a  coastline 
apparently  alter  the  effects  of  a  hurricane.   C ros s -  sec t i on 
D-D'  of  Hilda;  cross-section  G-G"  of  Betsy  (in  the  Gulf), 


2k 


and  cross-section  A-A'  of  Inez  each  show  similar  features. 
Upwelling  is  mostly  confined  beneath  or  slightly  offset  to 
the  left  of  the  hurricane  centers.   Also,  these  areas 
exhibit  extensive  upwelling. 

2 .  Downwe 1  1  ?  ng 

Downwelling,  as  a  result  of  the  divergence  of  the 
warm  water  from  the  upwelled  area,  is  not  as  clearly  defined 
as  in  the  deep  water  case.   The  extent  of  downwelling  is 
less,  being  only  several  meters,  as  compared  to  observed 
effects  in  deep  water.   Areas  where  extensive  downwelling 
was  noted,  such  as  c ros s -sec t i on  A-A'  of  Carla,  were 
possibly  associated  with  areas  of  convergence  of  an  induced 
current  with  an  already  present  current  in  an  opposite 
direction. 

3 .  Mixing 

The  mixing  in  the  areas  of  upwelling  and  downwelling 
is  more  common  in  shallow  water  as  evidenced  by  c ros s -  sec t i ons 
D-D'  of  Hilda,  G-G"  of  Betsy   (in  the  Gulf)  and  A-A'  of  Inez. 
The  extensive  mixing  exhibited  in  the  case  of  Betsy  is 
probably  a  result  of  the  effect  of  the  geographical  coastal 
boundary  and  the  effect  of  the  outflow  of  the  Mississippi 
River .  * 

k .   Sea  Surface  Temperature 

The  presence  of  a  coastal  boundary  and  the  added 
complication  of  the  outflow  of  a  major  river  makes  SST 
analysis  difficult.   The  outflow  of  the  Mississippi  River 
places  a  warm,  less  saline  tongue  of  water  over  the  area 


25 


where  Betsy  had  immediately  passed.   This  tongue  of  water 
soon  masks  any  effects  of  Betsy  on  the  SST. 


26 


V.   COMPARISON  WITH  THEORY 

O'Brien  and  Reid  [1967]  developed  a  theoretical  decryp- 
tion of  upwelling  induced  in  a  stratified,  rotating,  two- 
layered  ocean  by  momentum  transfer  from  an  intense  stationary, 
ax i a  1 1 y-symme t r i c  atmospheric  vortex.   The  dynamic  internal 
response  of  the  ocean  was  assumed  to  be  ax i a  1  1 y-symme t r i c . 
Transfer  of  momentum  between  the  air  and  the  sea  and  between 
the  upper  and  lower  layers  was  allowed. 

O'Brien  and  Reid  found  that  the  results  predicted  by  the 
model  agree  qualitatively  with  the  following  observations 
taken  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico  after  hurricane  Hilda,  1967. 
Intense  upwelling  was  confined  within  the  radius  of 
hu r r i cane- force  winds.   The  displaced  warm,  central  waters 
produced  some  downwelling  outside  the  upwelled  region.   The 
maximum  upwelling  occurred  at  approximately  16  nmi  from 
the  hurricane  path,  which  is  an  expected  response  to  the 
maximum  value  of  surface  wind  stress.   The  displaced 
warmer  waters  accounted  for  downwelling  and  thickening 
of  the  upper  layer  between  h$    and  100  nmi  from  the  hurri- 
cane path.   A  shallow  mixed  layer  less  than  25  meters  deep 
was  observed  along  the  hurricane  path  and  a  deeper  mixed 
layer  ^60-80  meters)  along  the  edges  of  the  c ros s -  sec t i on. 

O'Brien  [  1 9  6  7  3  continued  the  study  with  a  second  model 
that  included  mixing.   He  found  that  the  velocities  of  the 
two  models  are  essentially  the  same  and  mixing  had  little 
influence  on  the  dynamic  response  of  the  system  but  that  the 


27 


dynamic  response  does  influence  mixing.   Mixing  tends  to 
lower  the  temperature  and  increase  the  salinity  of  the 
surface  layer  of  the  ocean  oyer  a  broad  region.   Comparing 
the  theoretical  results  to  Hilda  observations,  O'Brien 
noted  that  in  observations  the  mixing  and  upwelling  were 
not  symmetric  about  the  hurricane  path.   He  concluded  that 
this  may  be  due  to  the  observed    asymmetry  of  the  wind  stress 
distributions  in  a  moving  cyclone-   The  latter  was  not 

incorporated  in  the  model. 

In  a  later  study,  O'Brien  [1968],  two  important  limitations 
to  the  above  models  were  relaxed.   They  were;  first,  a 
specifically  defined  tropical  storm  was  used  to  drive  the 
ocean;  and  the  second,  this  tropical  storm  was  constrained  to 
be  stationary  and  symmetric.   He  relaxed  these  limitations  to 
some  extent  and  varied  the  initial  layer  depth  from  30-150 
meters  (previous  model  100  meters),  the  radius  of  maximum  winds 
from  5~110  nmi  (previous  model  16  nmi),  and  varying  the  speed 
of  the  storm  from  three  to  eight  knots. 


The  relationships  used  by  O'Brien  were: 


du     ou     du     dh    r 


dv     dv     dv     dh     r 
^ —  +  u^ —  +  v —  +  g^—   =   — ru- 
at     3x     dy    y^y 


^n  +  ahu      ahv     0 


aPa  +  Tx  /Ph  -  Tx  /ph 


:*P     Tb  / ph  T1  /Ph 

d  „  a  ■  +   v  y  v 


ay 


at     ax       ay 


(1) 
(2) 

(3) 


whe  re 


p  is  the  density  of  the  ocean 

f    is  the  Coriolis  parameter 

g    is  the  acceleration  of  gravity 


28 


°a  is  the  pressure  at  a  radius  in  the  hurricane 

h  is  the  thickness  of  surface  layer  of  the  ocean 

t  is  the  independent  temporal  coordinate 

u  is  the  radial  velocity  in  the  ocean 

v  is  the  tangential  velocity  in  the  ocean 

e  is  the  density  contrast 

T^,  "m   are  the  wind  stress  components  at  sea  surface 

x  y 

T  ,  T'   are  the  components  of  internal  shearing 

x  y   stress  at  interface  between  layers. 


The  results  we  re : 

1.  Cold  wakes  associated  with  upwelling  occur  sooner 
if  the  tropical  storm  acts  on  a  shallow  layer  than  if  it 
acts  on  a  deep  layer. 

2.  As  the  tropical  storm  intensifies,  upwelling  is 
enhanced  . 

3.  As  the  tropical  storm  intensifies,  the  extent  of 
maximum  upwelling  becomes  independent  of  the  effective 
thermocline  depth.   For  weak  tropical  storms,  the  extent 

of  upwelling  is  highly  dependent  on  the  undisturbed  thermo- 
cline depth. 

k .   A  slowly-moving  tropical  storm,  even  though  not 
too  intense,  would  tend  to  produce  upwelling  in  its  wake. 
A  fast-moving  storm  might  not  produce  much  upwelling  if  the 
thermocline  is  deep,  simply  because  there  is  too  much  water 
to  move  in  a  short  time  and  the  rate  of  momentum  transfer 
to  the  ocean  would  be  too  slow. 


O'Brien's  [1968]  model  for  the  response  of  the  ocean  to 
a  slow-moving  tropical  storm  was  used  for  comparison  with 
the  data  contained  in  Table  1,  taken  from  Figures  9  through 
\k.       Actual  comparison  with  theory  can  only  be  made  with  slow 
moving,  intense,  and  very  intense  tropical  storms,  when  the 
speed  of  propagation  falls  within  the  three  to  eight  knot 
range  used  in  the  development  of  theory.   However, 


29 


conclusions  reached  by  O'Brien  can  be  extended  to  apply  to 
faster  propagating  and  more  intense  tropical  storms,,  since 
speed  and  intensity  were  independent  variables,  and  varia- 
tions of  these  showed  some  specific  tendencies;  that  is, 
that  a  tropical  storm's  increase  in  propagation  speed  lessens 
the  amount  and  extent  of  upwelling,  but  an  increase  in 
intensity  increases  the  amount  and  extent  of  upwelling. 

The  comparison  between  results  from  theoretical  model 
and  conclusions  drawn  from  observations  of  the  present  study 
is  considered  in  three  parts:   first:   slow-moving,  intense 
tropical  storms  (Hilda,  Betsy), and  a  very  intense  tropical 
storm,  (Carla).   Second:   a  fast-moving,  intense  tropical 
storm  (Betsy  in  the  Gulf);  and  third:  very  fast-moving, 
very  intense  tropical  storm  (Shirley).   Observations  from 
tropical  storm  Inez  and  c ros s -  sec t i ons  D-D'  of  Hilda  and 
G-G"  of  Betsy  (in  the  Gulf),  were  not  compared  to  results 
from  theory,  since   the  nearness  of  the  coastline  and  the 
shallow  depth  of  water  imposed  boundary  conditions  not  used 
i  n  theory . 

A.   SLOW-MOVING,  INTENSE  AND  VERY  INTENSE  TROPICAL  STORM 

O'Brien  and  Reid  and  O'Brien  have  shown  from  numerical 
studies  that  the  upwelled  isotherm  may  decrease  in  depth 
from  its  original  position  as  much  as  80  to  90  meters  and 
that  the  downwelling  isotherm  may  increase  in  depth  as 
much  as  10  to  20  meters.   Maximum  upwelling  occurs  within 
the  area  of  hu r r i cane- force  winds  and  maximum  downwelling 
occurs  k5    to  100  nmi  from  the  path  of  the  tropical  storm. 


30 


Comparison  of  c ros s -sec t i ons  A-A1,  B-B'  and  C-C'  of 
Hilda  and  cross  section  A-A"  and  B-B"  of  Betsy  to  show  the 
expected  variations.   As  the  intensity  of  the  winds  of  Hilda 
decreased,  the  depth  to  which  upwelling  occurred  (Sec.  C-C1) 
also  decreased.  An  examination  of  c ros s -sect  ion  A-A1  of  Carla 
shows  that  the  greater  intensity  of  this  hurricane  resulted 
in  upwelling  from  a  deeper  depth  than  in  Hilda.   This  is  as 
intuition  and  theory  would  predict. 

B.   FAST-MOVING,  INTENSE  TROPICAL  STORM 

Theory  predicts  that  as  the  propagation  speed  increases, 
the  amount  and  extent  of  upwelling  and  downwelling  decreases 
for  a  given  thermocline  depth.   Theory  also  predicts  that  as 
the  depth  of  thermocline  decreases,  the  amount  and  the  extent 
of  upwelling  increases  for  a  given  speed  of  propagation. 
Hurricane  Betsy  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico  was  of  the  same 
intensity  as  Hilda,  but  the  depth  of  the  thermocline  was 
shallower.   Examination  of  c ros s -  sec t i on s  C-C",  D-D",  E-E", 
and  F-F",  shows  extensive  upwelling  and  downwelling,  but  for 
a  shallower  depth  than  that  of  slower-moving  hurricanes  Hilda 
and  Carla.   This  agrees  with  what  theory  predicts.   Compari- 
son of  the  extent  of  upwelling  and  downwelling  with  that 
predicted  for  a  slow-moving  tropical  storm  of  the  same 
intensity  shows  agreement  in  c ros s -  sec t i on s  D-D"  and  F-F". 
C ros s -sec t i on  C-C"  and  E-E"  do  not  show  this  agreement,  and 
is  possibly  due  to  the  effect  of  the  eddy  described  by 
Wunderly  [1970]  . 


31 


C.   VERY  FAST-MOVING,  VERY  INTENSE  TROPICAL  STORM 

This  case  has  not  been  examined  theoretically,  but 
conclusions  from  theory  of  slower  and  less  intense  storms 
and  observations  imply  that  even  with  a  very  high  speed 
of  propagation,  the  high  intensity  of  typhoon  winds  would 
cause  a  significant  influence  on  the  vertical  temperature 
structure.   C ros s -sec t i on  A-A'  of  Shirley  shows  that 
Shirley,  a  storm  of  these  characteristics,  did  affect  the 
vertical  temperature  structure  and  caused  water  to  be 
upwelled  from  30  meters  to  the  surface. 


32 


VI  .   CONCLUSIONS 

Previous  studies  of  upwelling,  downwelling  and  mixing 
caused  by  a  tropical  storm  indicate  the  effects  to  be 
governed  by  several  parameters.   They  are: 

1.  Initial  depth  of  the  thermocline 

2.  Propagation  speed  of  the  hurricane 

3.  Intensity  of  the  hurricane 
k .  Depth  of  water 

5.   Nearness  of  shallow  water  and  coastal  boundaries 

Comparison  of  tropical  storms  Hilda,  Betsy,  Carla,  Inez 
and  Shirley  show  that: 

1.  Observational  data  for  slow-moving,  intense  trop- 
ical storms  is  relatively  consistent  from  storm  to  storm, 
and  agrees  qualitatively  with  the  theory  of  O'Brien,  and 
O'Brien  and  Re  i  d  . 

2.  Observations  show  that  an  increase  in  propagation 
speed,  while  maintaining  the  same  intensity,  results  in 
less  upwe 1  1  i  ng . 

3-  Observations  show  that  a  decrease  in  intensity, 
while  maintaining  the  same  propagation  speed,  decreases 
upwe 1  1  i  ng . 

k.       Observations  show  that  the  presence  of  a  coastal 
boundary  and  the  shallow  depth  of  water  results  in  exten- 
sive mixing.   This  lends  support  to  the  validity  of  the 
assumptions  of  Franceschini  and  El-Sayed  concerning  hurri 
cane  Inez. 

5.  The  simple-index  layer  method  of  comparison  is  a 
useful  method  for  comparing  the  effects  on  the  vertical 
temperature  structure  caused  by  a  tropical  storm. 

6.  A  search  of  literature  shows  that  observational 
data  suitable  for  this  type  of  study  is  extremely  scarce 
considering  the  number  of  hurricanes  observed  each  year. 


33 


VII.   RECOMMENDATI ONS 


It  is  recommended  that: 

1.  Procedures  be  set  up  to  take  aircraft  expendable 
bathythermographs  (XBT's),  prior  to,  and  after  severe 
tropical  storms.   Tracks  normal  to  the  projected  path  of 
tropical  storms  could  be  predicted  with  a  fair  degree  of 
confidence  at  times,  and  XBT  drops  made.   The  ready  avail- 
ability of  data  gathered  this  way  would  simplify  and  enhance 
the  study  of  the  effects  of  tropical  storms  on  the  vertical 
temperature  structure  of  the  ocean. 

2.  A  computer  study  based  on  the  model  proposed  by 
O'Brien  [1968]  should  be  conducted,  incorporating  the  effects 
of  evaporation,  precipitation,  sensible  and  turbulent  heat 
transfer,  and  radiation  exchanges  with  the  atmosphere.   The 
propagation  speed  of  the  tropical  storm  should  be  extended 
beyond  the  present  value  of  eight  knots. 


3A 


APPENDIX    A 


CRUISE      HILDA     TRACK 

SECTIONS      AND      B.T    NOS. 

GUS    m,      OCT,      1964 


Fig.  1.   Cruise  track  used  by  GUS  Ml  for  AFTER  HI  Ida (1964) . 
This  figure  represents  the  method  of  selection  of  cross- 
sectional  lines  A-A'  through  D-D'  and  the  method  of  projection 


35 


JLL 


120 

6T 

1— 


60 


8T 


0 

ST" 

r- 


60  NMi 


120 


50 


X 

a. 

UJ 

O 


100 


150 


REPRESENTS  BEFORE   OR  UNDISTURBED    ISOTHERMS 
ADDED   FOR    CLARITY 

BEFORE 


CC 

Ul 


5 


LU 

o 


50 


100 


150 


A0     NMi  1?0 

«r "  a -  er 

— I — f 


REPRESENTS    AFTER     ISOTHERMS 


'ADDED    FOR     CLARITY 


AFTER 


Fig.  2.   An  example  of  the  construction  of  the  figures 
used  for  analysis. 


36 


o 
oo 


Fig.  3.  Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS  for  UNDISTURBED 
Hilda  (1964)  and  BEFORE  Betsy  (1965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico, 
(after  Leipper  [1967]  )  . 


37 


Fig.  A.   Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS  for  AFTER 
Betsy  (1965),  and  Location  of  Cross-sections  C-C"  through 
G-G",  (after  Leipper  [ 1968J )  . 


38 


z 

2.  lO 

o 


o 

CO 


m 

CN 


o 

CN 


to 


'£><> 


in 
o 

Z 


> 

X"    CO 
/  <Ouj 

/        0.       CO.- 


^J^'O 


Ftg.  5.   Position  of  Cross-sections  A-A"  and  B-B"  across 
the  Track  of  Betsy  (1965)  with  Location  of  Radio-Transmitted 


BT'  s, 


(after  Landis  and  Leipper  [1968]). 


39 


Fig.  6.   Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  HIDALGO  for  Thermistor- 
Chain  Tows  of  BEFORE  and  AFTER  Carla  (1961 )  and  Location 
of  Cross-section  A-A',  (after  Stevenson  and  Armstrong  [  1965  3 ) 


*»0 


Fig.  7.   Cruise  Track  used  by  R/V  ALAMINOS  for  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Inez  (1966)  and  Location  of  Cross-section  A-A1, 
(after  Franceschini  and  El-Sayed  [1968]). 


k] 


134 


Fig.  8.   Cruise  Track  Used  by  R/V  ATLANTIS  II  for  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Shirley  ( I  9  6  5 )  and  Location  of  C ros s -  sec t i on 
A-A'  ,  (after  Wright  [ l 969] )  . 


hi 


SFC   £ 


120 


60 


60 


120NML/ 
A 


Fig.   9a.   Temperature-depth  cross-section  A-A1,  UND 
and  AFTER  Hilda  (1964).  (See  Fig.  1  for  location.) 


V23°C 

I  STURBED 


120      N.Mi^/ 

D 


«/> 


X 
>- 
a. 
ui 
Q 


200     - 


DASHED     LINE   IS   UNDIS 


Fig.   9b.  Temperature-depth  c ros s -sec t i on  B- B '  ,  UND  I  S i URBED 
and  AFTER  H i  l da  (l 964)  .  (See  Fig.  1  for  location.) 


43 


Fig.   9c.  Temperature-depth  cross-section  C -C '  ,  UND  I  STURBED 
and  AFTER  H  i 1  da  (1 964) .   (See  Fig.  1  for  location.) 


SFC 


OS 
UJ 

-  50 

UJ 

2 


100 


MIXING 


PATH  OF  HILDA 
DASHED  LINE  IS  BEFORE  ISOTHERM 


Fig.   9d .  Temperature-depth  c ros s -  sec t i on  D-D',  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  H i 1  da (1 964 )  .   (See  Fig.  1  for  location.) 


kk 


SFC 


60 
i 


0 

—r 


60 
— 1— 


120     N.Mi     // 

A 

I 


50 


X  100 

»- 
o. 

HI 
Q 


150 


y- 


26°C 
---26°C 

24°C 

24°C 


UPWELL !NG    y' 


PATH    OF     BETSY 
DASHED    LINE    IS    BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


Fig.     10a.    Temperature-depth    cross-section    A-A",     BEFORE 
and    AFTER    Betsy(1965)     based    on     radio    transmitted    data.     (See 
Fig.     5    for     1  oca  t  i  on . ) 


sfc£ 


180 


120 


50 


OS 


UJ 

—100 


o. 
ui 
a 

150 


60 

i 


0 


60    H.Mi 


DOWNWELLING 


UPYVELLING 
PAn  BETSY 


DASHED    LINE    IS    BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


Fig.     10b.     Temperature-depth    c ros s -sec t i on    B-B",     BEFORE 
and    AFTER    Betsy(1965)     based    on    radio    transmitted    data.     (See 
Fig.    5    for    1  oca  t  i  on  .  ) 


45 


SFC 


50 


UJ 

Ul 

X 


100 


X 

►- 

UJ 

a 


150 


120    N.  Mi'/ 


UPWELLIHG 


UPWELLING        /" 

\  / 

\  /       PATH    OF   BETSY 

\ 
\  /      DASHED     LINE    IS     BEFORE     ISOTHERM 


Fig.  lla.  Temperature-depth  c ros s -sec t i on  C-C",  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Betsy(l965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico.  (See  Fig.  k 
for  l.oca  t  i  on  .  ) 


120 


N.  Mi 


DOWNWELUNG 

28°C      28°C 
46°C 


I) 

-T 


DASHED   LINE    IS   BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


Fig.  II b.  Temperature-depth  cross-section  D-D",  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Betsy(l965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico.  (See  Fig.  k 
for  l oca  t  ?  on . ) 


kG 


SFC 


50 


2 


.100 


150 


120      N.Mi    c'' 


PATH    OF   BETSY 
DASHED    LINE    IS  BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


Fig.     11c.    Temperature-depth    cr os s -sec t i on    E-E",     BEFORE 
and    AFTER    Betsy(l965)     in     the    Gulf    of    Mexico.        (See    Fig.     k 
f or     1  oca  t  i  on . ) 


SFC 


50 


d: 
uj 

UJ 

2 


100 


Ui 

O 


150 


120    N.Mi    " 


DOWNWFLLING 


28°C 


DASHED  LINE  IS  BEFORE  ISOTHERM 


Fig.  lid.  Temperature-depth  cross-section'  F-F",  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Betsy(l965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico.   (See  Fig.  *t 
for  location.) 


hi 


SFC 


50 


cc 

Ui 
Ul 

1100 

►- 
Q. 

UJ 

O 


150  - 


120M.jftl 

TzFcT 


MIXING 


MIXING 


UPWELLING 


PATH    OF  BETSY 
DASHED  LINE    IS     BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


Fig.  lie.  Temperature-depth  c ros s -  sec t i on  G-G",  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Betsy(l965)  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico.   (See  Fig.  h 
for  location.) 


ctr 


_100 


Ul 

Q 


150 


PATH    OF  SHIRLEY 


DASHED    LINF     IS  BEFORE    ISOTHERM 


^_s 


Fig.  12.  Terppera  tu  re-depth  c  ros  s  -  sec  t  i  on  A-A1',  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Sh i r 1 ey  (J  965 )  .  (See  Fig.  6  for  location.) 


1*8 


SFC 


—   50 
cc 

UJ 
Ul 

2 


100 


o. 

Ul 

O 


150 


0 

T 


60 


N.Mi 


120A' 


DOWNWE  LNNG 


-s26vC 

26*fc 


-'^24  C 


PATH    OF   CARLA 


DASHED    LINE    IS     BEFORE     ISOTHERM 


Fig.     13.    Temperature-depth    c ros s -  sec t i on    A-A',     BEFORE 
and    AFTER    Car  1  a  (l'96l  )     based    on     towed     t  her  mister    chain    dat< 
(See    Fig.     7    for     location.) 


60  NMi 


Fig.  1  ^  .  Temperature-depth  c ros s -sec t i on  A-A',  BEFORE 
and  AFTER  Inez(l966),   (See  pfg.  8  for  location.) 


hS 


01  STANCE 

FROM  PATH 

TO  MAX. 

DOWNWELL ING 

■1 

65      80 
75      30 
70      50 
70      ' 

NOT  OBS 
60    NOT  OBS 

NOT  OBS 
18      120 

ON  PATH 
85        90 
110      110 

NOT  OBS    20 

50       50 

60      60 
1.5-100   1.5-100 

OEPTH 

OF 
WATER 

(METERS) 

1000 
1000 

loo-  iooo 

100 

1000 
1000 
1000 

iooo 

1000 
1000 
200-  1000 

500 

200-  2000 

200 
INFINITE 

TIME  DATA  WAS 
GATHEREO 

(DAY) 

O 

03 

UN                O                                                                                                    ^~~ 

cni              rN                                                O             —              -3-                                                                                                                    _ 
UN                 r^                 <-,                 ON                                       .                     ,                  CO                 UJ                 -                -                   •                                         ~                                      f                                      ?                 £ 

J;           V           +            +                          m           un           *            +            +           ■+            «                          +                           +                                        z 

~*            "+                                                                           *                                                                                                          u. 

cccz^'^                    '        ~        !C                                                                              o 

OOO*                                  UN               un                                                    fM               r* 

£i:_=5                     7          .          on         r^         ao         uj          un                                           f*-                                *r 
+            +            +■                                     >~*         w           1             1           w         V           '                          '                          '                          '            z 

EXTENT  OF 

HURRI CANE 

WINDS 

(NMI) 

o 

70    8f 
70    80 
80    85 
80    80 

85    85 
85    85 
85    90 
90    90 
90    90 
90    90 
90    90 

UKN 

90    90 

60    60 

5- 100  5-100 

MAXIMUM 

FORCE 
OF  WINOS 

(KNOTS) 

oooo                          o            o            o            o            o           o            un                          o                          o                          O 
^(s,_o                               f^^^rvjrM             —              o                               un                               un                              _^ 

PROPAGATION 
SPEED  OF 
HURRI CANE 

(KNOTS) 

—                         *.                        -r                         *■                       -^                      -*                       ^T                                                    O                                                  OO                                                  OO                      CO 

CO                 CO                 CO                 CO                                      j-uj^J-JJ-I                                       O                                      <= 

<  U-    I 
uj         o  h- 

uT    _1                  tt 

<  <   t-   u.  uj 
u>    Z    O    >- 

C    —    UJ           < 

uj  i-  x   r  _i 

_j   «r   uj   O 

uj   >   <   h-  uj 
3         _J  o  o 

^3  X   UN          — 

h*  —  UJ 
z       ox 

.-            1- 

4. 

4 

o 

60        65 
60        65 
55        50 
50        50 

110        70 

90        85 

120        55 
1.0        25 

1.1.        UO 

NO  DATA 

35        <tS 

1.5        50 

35        15 
115        60 

70        70 

50        1.5 
DECREASE  IN  DEPTH 

.- 

X 

o 

or: 
C9 

z 
z 

3 

o 

a 

e 

tr. 

I5A5      10/60 
20/1.0/     10/60 
10/50      8/70 
6/50      35/<.0* 

NOT  OBS 
NOT  OBS 
NOT  OBS 
8/28     25/1.8 

NO  DATA 
8/35      15/60 
32/  5     27/U 

20/1.5      15/75 

15/75      10/90 

8/55      15/65 

DECREASE/ INCREASE 
UP  TO  20 

GE  IN  THICKNESS/OEPT 
THE  INDEX  LAYER  (M) 

UPWELLING 

II 

O 

o 
«                                                                                                      on 

a£             oc             tc             at:                                                      a:  a:             a:             or.             a:             ^                       ^                                                                orujo 

U                  O                 U                  =>                                       OUN3Z3IJ15313                                =>  ^                                      "^                                      O                 U>00 

UN                      1/1                       UI                       M                                                   l~«                      ^N             J,^,                       UI                       UI                       UI                       ^                                          ""^                                                   <".                                                   UI                       < 

UN                   UN                   UN                   O                                            O                    UN           UN  UN                   O                    O                    UN                   ^                                    ^^                                           °                                            O                    CC(- 
UJ                 UN                J                  UN                                     -JT                 f\         .3"   r^\                J-                 rsj                 ^T                                                     —  —                                       UN                                      UNuj 

O   2J 

<                                                                                                                                                                                          ^ 

O                    O                    UN                   O                                            UN                   UN           UNO                    UN                   <                    O                   °                                    °°                                            ^                                            O                    < 
UN                 UN                -x                 -J                                      vOUJJ-'-N^NO^N'^                               r^ON                                     UJ                                      -JT                 UJ 

OO^OOOD                                      UNUN0UN00O00                               <°°                                      ^                                      OO 

CHAN 
OF 

OOWNWELLING  LEFT 

< 

c 

3/1.5  15/70 
30/50     20/95 

8/1.0  20/65 
10/35     50/65* 

NOT  OBS 
1.0/65     20/80 

NOT  OBS 
30/65     50/1*5* 
25/30     1.0/55 
8/30     12/1.0 
8/30     8/38 

NO  DATA 

6/70     15/80 

10/35     10/11.0 

OECREASE/INCREASE 
UP  TO  20 

MAX  1  MUM 

SEA 

SURFACE 

TEMPERATURE 

CC) 

u>                                                                                                                                                                                        ui                                                     < 
oou»u>                                  oooooo0                                  *-*                                  °                                     U»UJ 

a 

^.       

z  z 

<  o 

ui   O 

—    X 

•    c 

v.  a 

o  ~ 

^r                                                                                            un                                                                                                                                                 UJ                                  —                                  — . 

uj                  -                    -                    --vO"                    ------                    ON                 -                   UJ                 -                   UJ                 - 

ON<a3u^OON<o^u>OuJU.c,                —                <t                on               «I               UJ                < 

~<cooo-'<a3oouju.el               >-             <              ~--             <              —              <              > 

c 

CD 


</» 
>- 

ro 

c 
< 


v. 
0) 


o 

4-> 


fD 

o 

Q. 
O 

!_ 
I— 


<u 

• 

J= 

>- 

4-J 

s_ 

O 

4- 

0) 

O-C 

1— 

10 

04- 

— 

O 

4-J 

00 

tn 

.— 

C 

1_ 

o 

0) 

— 

4-J 

4J 

o 

o 

fD 

— 

S-XI 

fD 

0) 

x: 

1- 

OQ_ 

fD 


50 


1 . 


2. 


LIST  OF  REFERENCES 


Uda,  M.,  On  the  Variation  of  Water  Temperature  Due  to 
the  Passage  of  Typhoon,  Misc.  Papers  No .  %~,     Tokyo 
University  of  Fisheries,  pp. 297-298,  1954. 


Fisher,  E.  L.,  "Hurricanes  and  the  Sea-surface 
Temperature  Field,"  J .  Me  teoro 1  . ,  v.  15,  pp 
333,  1958. 


328- 


3.  Jordan,  C.  L.,  "On  the  Influence  of  Tropical  Cyclones 

on  the  Sea  Surface  Temperature  Field,"  P  roc .  Symp . 
Trop .  Meteor.,  New  Zealand  Meteor.  Service,  Wellington, 
pp.  614-622,  1964. 

4.  Leipper,  D.  F.,  "Observed  Ocean  Conditions  and  Hurricane 

Hilda,  1964."   J  .  Atmos .  Sci  .  ,  v.  24,  pp.  182-196,  1967. 

5.  Stevenson,  R.E.,  and  R.  S.  Armstrong,  "Heat  Loss  from 

the  Waters  of  the  Northwest  Gulf  of  Mexico  During 
Hurricane  Carla."   Geofis.  Intern.,  v.  5,  pp.  49-57, 
1965. 

6.  Landis,  Robert  C.  and  D.  F.  Leipper,  "Effects  of  Hurricane 

Betsy  upon  Atlantic  Ocean  Temperature,  Based  on  Radio- 
Transmitted  Data."   J.  Applied  Meteorol.,  v.  7,  pp. 
554-562,  1968. 


7. 


8. 


Hazelworth,  John  B.  "Water  Temperature  Variations 
Resulting  from  Hurricanes,"  "  J.  Geophys.  Res.  ,  v 
No.  16,  pp.  5105-5123,  1968. 


73, 


O'Brien,  J.  J.,  and  R.  0.  Reid,  "The  Non-Linear  Response 

of  a  Two-Layer  Baroclinic  Ocean  to  a  Stationary, 

Ax i a  1  1 y- Symme t r i c  Hurricane:   Part  I.   Upwelling 

Induced  by  Momentum  Transfer."   J  .  Atmos .  Sc  ?  .  ,  v.  24, 
pp.  197-207,  1967. 


9.   O'Brien,  J.  J.,  "The  Non-Linear  Response  of  a  Two-Layer 
Baroclinic  Ocean  to  a  Stationary,  Ax i a  1  1 y- Symme t r i c 
Hurricane:   Part  II.   Upwelling  and  Mixing  by  Momentum 
Transfer."   J  .  Atmos .  Sci  .  ,  v.  24,  pp.  208-215,  1967. 

10.  O'Brien,  J.  J.,  "The  Response  of  the  Ocean  to  a  Slowly- 

Moving  Cyclone."   Annalen  der  Me teoro 1 og ? e ,  v.  4, 
pp.  60-66,  1968. 

11.  Francesch i n i , G . A ,  and  Sayed  Z.  El-Sayed,  "Effect  of 

Hurricane  Inez  (1966)  on  the  Hydrography  and  Productiv 

ity   of  the  Western  Gulf  of  Mexico,"   Deutsche 

Hyd rog raph i sche  Zeitschrift  ,  v.  5,  pp.  193"202,  1 9  6  8  . 


51 


12.   Wright,  Redwood,  "Temperature  Structure  Across  the 

Kuroshio  Before  and  After  Typhoon  Shirley,"   Te 1  1  us  XXI 
v.  3,  pp.  409-i*l  3 ,  1969. 


13.  Wunderly,  W.  L.,  Indicated  Geostrophic  Velocities  and 

Volume  Transports,  Central  and  Eastern  Gulf  of  Mexico, 
Warmest  and  Coldest  Months.,  Master's  Thesis,  United 
States  Naval  Postgraduate  School,  Monterey,  1970. 

14.  Leipper,  D.  F.,  Hydrographic  Station  Data,  Gulf  of 

Mex  i  co ,  Texas  A&M  University  Department  of  Ocean- 
ography reports  6  8  -  1 3  T  ,  1 9  6  8 . 


52 


INITIAL  D  ISTRI BUTI ON  L I  ST 


1.  Defense  Documentation  Center 
Came  ron  Station 
Alexandria,  Virginia  2  2  31^ 

2.  Department  of  Oceanography 
Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 

3.  Oceanog raphe r  of  the  Navy 
The  Madison  Building 

732  North  Washington  Street 
Alexandria,  Virginia  223H 

k .   Dr.  Ned  A.  Ostenso 

Office  of  Naval  Research 

Code  ^80  D 

Ar 1  i  ngton  ,  Va .  222 1 7 

5  .   Dr.  D.  F.  Leipper 

Department  of  Oceanography 
Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939 -iO 

6.  Professor  Ken  Davidson 
Department  of  Oceanography 
Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 

7.  Professor  Robert  0.  Re i d 
Department  of  Oceanography 
Texas  ASM  University 
College  Station,  Texas  778^3 

8.  Professor  James  J.  O'Brien 
Department  of  Meteorology 
and  Oceanography 

Florida  State  University 
Tallahassee,  Florida  32306 

9.  Li  brary  ,  Code  021 2 

Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 

1 0  .   LCDR  William  Revesz ,  Jr . 
306  Genesee  Street 
Trenton,  New  Jersey  08611 


No .  Cop  i  es 
2 


53 


11.  Commanding  Officer 

Fleet  Numerical  Weather  Central 
Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 

12.  Graduate  Department 

Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography 

Box  109 

LaJolla,  California  92037 

13-   Dr.  C.  L.  Jordan 

Department  of  Meteorology 
Florida  State  University 
Tallahassee,  Florida  32306 

14.  Mr .  I  .  Per  1  roth 

National  Oceanog raph i c  Data  Center 
Washington,  D.C.  20390 

15.  Mr.  Henry  Odom 

National  Oceanog raph i c  Data  Center 
Wash  i  ngton ,  D.C.  20390 

16.  Dr .  R.  Cec  i  1  Gentry 

National  Hurricane  Research  Laboratory 

Box  8265 

Coral  Gables,  Florida  33124 

17.  Dr.  H.  Burr  Stei  nbach 
Dean  of  Graduate  Studies 

Woods  Hole  Oceanog ra ph i c  Institution 
Woods  Hole,  Massachusetts  0  2  5 ^.3 

18.  Dr .  R.  Wr  i  ght 

Woods  Hole  Oceanog ra ph i c  Institution 
Woods  Hole,  Massachusetts  025^3 

19.  Dr.  G.  A.  Granceschini 
Department  of  Oceanography 
Texas  A&M  University 
College  Station,  Texas  7  7  8  ^  3 

l 

20.  Dr.  R.  F.  Stevenson 

Scripps  Institution  of  Oceanography 

Box  109 

LaJolla,  California  92037 

21.  Department  of  Physics 
The  University  of  Tulsa 
600  South  Col  1 ege 
Tulsa,  Okl ahoma ,  7^104 


No .  Copies 
1 


5* 


Security  Classification 


DOCUMENT  CONTROL  DATA  -R&D 


[Security   classification  of  title,    body  of  abstract  and  indexing  annotation  must  be  entered  when   the  overall  report  is    classified) 


Originating    activity   (Corporate  author) 

Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 


2a.   REPORT    SECURITY    CLASblFICATIOf 

Unclassified 


2b.    GROUP 


I      REPORT     TITLE 


Comparison  of  Effects  of  Various  Tropical  Storms  on  the  Vertical 
Temperature  Structure  of  the  Ocean  Using  Pictorial  Representation 

*     DESCRIPTIVE   NOTES  (Type  of  report  and,inclusive  dates) 

Master's  Thesis;  September  1971 

5     *u  tmORiSI  (First  name,  middle  initial,  last  name) 

William    Revesz ,     Jr. 


.      REPOR  T    DATE 


Septembe  r  1971 


7m.     TOTAL    NO.    OF    PAGES 

57 


76.    NO.    OF    RE  FS 


»«.    CONTRACT    OR    GRANT    NO. 


6.    PROJEC  T    NO 


9a.    ORIGINATOR'S    REPORT    NUMBER(S) 


9b.    OTHER    REPORT   NO(S)  (Any  other  numbers   that  may  be  assigned 
this  report) 


10      DISTRIBUTION    STATEMENT 


This  document  has  been  approved  for  public  release  and  sale; 
Its  distribution  is  unlimited. 


II      SUPPLEMENTARY    NOTES 


12.    SPONSO  RING    Ml  LI  T  AR  Y     ACTIVITY 


Naval  Postgraduate  School 
Monterey,  California  939^0 


3.  ABSTRACT 


To  make  comparisons  of  the  effects  of  tropical  storms  on 
the  ocean's  vertical  temperature  structure,  temperature-depth 
cross-sections  were  constructed  using  bathythermograph  data 
and  data  from  published  articles. 

y  t  rop  i  ca 1 
nd  compa  red  . 
i  ca 1  storm, 
bserved  within 
g  as  much  as 
h  of  the  storm, 
u 1 ts  of 
al  storm  has 
ucture  if  the 
r  degree  than 
f  rom  a  depth 
e  winds.   A 
n  cause  up- 
line is  shall ow 


Upwe 1  1  i  ng , 

d 

ownwe 1 1 

i  ng  and  m  i  x  i 

ng  ,  caused  b 

s  torms  in  deep 

an 

d  shal  1 

ow  water,  are  analyzed  a 

For  a  si ow-mov  i 

ng 

,  intense  and  very 

intense  trop 

upwe 1  1  i  ng ,  f  rom 

a 

depth 

of  hO    to  65 

meters,  is  o 

the  radius  of  h 

urricane- 

force  winds. 

Downwe 1  1  i  n 

20  me  te  r s  occurs 

from  kS 

to  110  nm  i 

from  the  pat 

Th  i  s  compa  res  f 

a vorab 1 y 

with  the  the 

ore  t  i  ca 1  res 

O'Brien  and  Re  i 

d  . 

A  fas  t-mov  i  ng ,  in 

tense  t  rop  i  c 

a  similar  ef  feet 

on  the 

vertical  tern 

perature  str 

the  rmoc line  is 

sh 

allow, and  upwelling 

,  of  a  1 es  so 

that  caused  by 

a 

s 1  owe  r- 

mov  i  ng  storm 

,  can  occur 

of  35  meters  wi 

th 

i  n  the 

radius  of  hu r r i cane- for c 

ve  ry  fa  s  t-mov  i  n 

g, 

very  i 

ntense  tropi 

cal  storm  ca 

we  1 1  i  ng  f  rom  a 

de 

pth  of 

30  meters  if 

the  thermoc 

FORM 

1    NO  V   68 

/N    0101 -807-681 1 


1473 


(PAGE    1) 


55 


Security  Classification 


A-3M08 


Security  Classification 


KEV     WORDS 


Hurricanes 

Typhoon 

U  pwe 1  1  i  ng 

Air-Sea  Interactions 


FORM 

1    NOV    69 


1473  (BACK 


101-507-682  1 


56 


Security  Classification 


IS 


;t»tf 


130324 

Thesis  I 

R365       Revesz  Qf   effects 

.  compans    troo-,Cal 

°f  Var'°n  the  vertical 
storms  on  the  i ' 
temperature  struct         _ 

*    the  ocean  usany^K- 
"t-gjfii   represented. 

25700    ' 


4 


Thesis  ^.30324 

R365        Revesz 

c.l  Comparison  of  effects 

of  various   tropical 
storms  on   the  vertical 
temperature   structure 
of   the  ocean  using  pic- 
torial   representation. 


thesR365 

Comparison  of  effects  of  < 


3  2768  002  01322  9 

DUDLEY  KNOX  LIBRARY 


'*