Skip to main content

Full text of "A course of modern analysis : an introduction to the general theory of infinite processes and of analytic functions ; with an account of the principal transcendental functions"

See other formats


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2007  with  funding  from 

IVIicrosoft  Corporation 


http://www.archive.org/details/courseofmodernanOOwhituoft 


A  COURSE  OF 

MODERN    ANALYSIS 


CAMBRIDGE   UNIVERSITY   PRESS 

C.  F.  CLAY,  Manager 

itonlion :   FETTEE   LANE,    E.G. 

lEtrinturgJ):    100  PEINCES   STREET 


i^eto  gorh:    G.  P.  PUTNAM'S  SONS 

ISombHp,  Calctttfa  anti  ilaUrag:    MACMILLAN  AND  CO.,  Ltd. 

STotonto:  J.  M.  DENT  AND  SONS,  Ltd. 

CToftgo:    THK   MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA 


All  rights  reserved 


A    COURSE    OF 

MODEEN    ANALYSIS 


AN   INTRODUCTION   TO   THE   GENERAL  THEORY   OF 

INFINITE   PROCESSES   AND   OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS; 

WITH   AN   ACCOUNT   OF  THE   PRINCIPAL 

TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


SECOND    EDITION,   COMPLETELY    REVISED 


BY 


E.   T.   WHITTAKER,   D.Sc,    F.R.S. 

PROFESSOR  OF   MATHEMATICS   IN   THE   UNIVERSITY   OF    EDINBURGH 


AND 


G.   N.   WATSON,   M.A. 


FELLOW   t/F   TRINITY   COLLEGE,   CAMBRIDGE,   AND   ASSISTANT   PROFESSOR 
OF   PURE    MATHEMATICS   AT  UNIVERSITY   COLLEGE,   LONDON 


CAMBRIDGE: 

AT  THE   UNIVERSITY   PRESS 

1915 


First  Edition  1902 
Second  Edition  1915 


PEEFACE 

When  the  first  edition  of  my  Course  of  Modem  Analysis  became 
exhausted,  and  the  Syndics  of  the  Press  invited  me  to  prepare  a  second 
edition,  I  determined  to  introduce  many  new  features  into  the  work.  The 
pressure  of  other  duties  prevented  me  for  some  time  from  carrying  out  this 
plan,  and  it  seemed  as  if  the  appearance  of  the  new  edition  might  be 
indefinitely  postponed.  At  this  juncture,  my  friend  and  former  pupil, 
Mr  G.  N.  Watson,  offered  to  share  the  work  of  preparation ;  and,  with  his 
cooperation,  it  has  now  been  completed. 

The  appearance  of  several  treatises  on  the  Theory  of  Convergence,  such 
as  Mr  Hardy's  Course  of  Pure  Mathematics  and,  more  particularly, 
Dr  Bromwich's  Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  led  us  to  consider  the  desirability 
of  omitting  the  first  four  chapters  of  this  work ;  but  we  finally  decided  to 
retain  all  that  was  necessary  for  subsequent  developments,  in  order  to  make 
the  book  complete  in  itself.  The  concise  account  which  will  be  found  in 
these  chapters  is  by  no  means  exhaustive,  although  we  believe  it  to  be  fairly 
complete.  For  the  discussion  of  Infinite  Series  on  their  own  merits,  we  may 
refer  to  the  work  of  Dr  Bromwich. 

The  new  chapters  on  Riemann  Integration,  on  Integral  Equations,  and 
on  the  Riemann  Zeta-Function,  are  entirely  due  to  Mr  Watson  :  he  has 
revised  and  improved  the  new  chapters  which  I  had  myself  drafted  and  he 
has  enlarged  or  partly  rewritten  much  of  the  matter  which  appeared  in  the 
original  work.  It  is  therefore  fitting  that  our  names  should  stand  together 
on  the  title-page. 

Grateful  acknowledgment  must  be  made  to  Mr  W.  H.  A.  Lawrence,  B.A., 
and  Mr  C.  E.  Winn,  B.A.,  Scholars  of  Trinity  College,  who  with  great 
kindness  and  care  have  read  the  proof-sheets,  to  Miss  Wrinch,  Scholar  of 
Girton  College,  who  assisted  in  preparing  the  index,  and  to  Mr  Littlewood, 
who  read  the  early  chapters  in  manuscript  and  made  many  helpful  criticisms. 
Thanks  are  due  also  to  many  readers  of  the  first  edition  who  supplied 
corrections  to  it ;  and  to  the  staff  of  the  University  Press  for  much  courtesy 
and  consideration  during  the  progress  of  the  printing. 

E.   T.   WHITTAKER. 
Juli/  1915 


CONTENTS 


PART  I.    THE   PROCESSES  OF  ANALYSIS 

CHAPTER  PAGE 

I  Complex  Niimb'ers 3 

II  The  Theory  of  Convergence 11 

III  Continuous  Functions  and  Uniform  Convergence    .      •  .         .         .        .  41 

IV  The  Theory  of  Riemann  Integration 61 

V  The  fundamental  properties  of  Analytic  Functions  ;  Taylor's,  Laurent's, 

and  Liouville's  Theorems 82 

VI  The  Theory  of  Residues ;  application  to  the  evaluation  of  Definite  Integrals  111 

VII  The  expansion  of  functions  in  Infinite  Series 125 

VIII  Asymptotic  Expansions  and  Summable  Series 150 

IX  Fourier  Series 160 

X  Linear  Differential  Equations 188 

XI        Integral  Equations 205 


PART  II.     THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS 

XII       The  Gamma  Function       .... 

XIII  The  Zeta  Function  of  Riemann 

XIV  The  Hypergeometric  Function  . 

XV  Legendre  Functions   ..... 

XVI  The  Confluent  Hypergeometric  Function 

XVII  Bessel  Functions 

XVIII  The  Equations  of  Mathematical  Physics 
XIX      Mathieu  Functions 

XX       Elliptic  Functions.     General  theorems  and  the 

XXI  The  Theta  Functions         .... 

XXII  The  Jacobian  Elliptic  Functions 

Appendix 

List  of  Authors  quoted 

General  Index         


Weierstrassian 


Functions 


229 
259 
275 
296 
331 
349 
379 
397 
422 
455 
484 

529 
541 
545 


[Note.  The  decimal  system  of  paragraphing,  introduced  by  Pe-ano,  is  adopted  in  this 
work.  The  integral  part  of  the  decimal  represents  the  number  of  the  chapter  and  the 
fractional  parts  are  arranged  in  each  chapter  in  order  of  magnitude.  Thus,  e.g.,  on 
pp.  181,  182,  §  9-632  precedes  §  97  becausis  9-632  <  97.] 


ADDITIONS   AND   COREECTIONS 

Page  13,  footnote,  Page  16,  line  29,  Page  27,  footnote  and  Page  29,  footnote,  for 
'  Algdbraique  '  read  '  Algdbrique.' 

Page  15,  line  2.  It  is  not  quite  obvious  that,  if  a  sequence  {x^  has  one  limit-point  I,  then  I 
is  the  limit  of  the  sequence.  To  prove  this,  observe  that,  if,  for  some  positive  value  of 
e,  no  number  %  could  be  found  such  that  |  ^„- J  |  <e  whenever  n>no,  then,  given  any 
suf&x  ?ir,  we  can  always  find  a  g7-eater  auffix  n^+i,  such  that  \Xn  —  l\^f  when  n  =  rir  +  i> 
the  sequence  ^Byj-^n,?.--  then  has  a  limit-point  (§  2'21)  other  than  I;  and  this  is 
evidently  inconsistent  with  {x^}  having  I  as  its  only  limit-point. 

Page  36,  line  7.  The  introduction  into  Analysis  of  Infinite  Determinants  is  due  to 
E.  Fiirstenau,  Darstellung  der  reellen  Wurzeln  algehraischer  Gleichungen  durch  Deter- 
minanten  der  Coeffizienten.     (Marburg,  1860.) 

Page  87,  line  30,  for  '  Raout '  read  '  Ravut.' 

Page  147,  example  13.  Demonstrations  of  Wronski's  expansion  have  been  given  by 
Cayley,  Quarterly  Journal,  xii.  (1873),  and  Transon,  Nouv.  Ann.  de  Math.  xiii.  (1874). 

00        I                                                »         1 
Page  186,  example  15, /or  2  ~ ^^  sin  (6?i -  3)  .^;  read  2 -ii\n{<o7i-2,)  x. 

n=l  OW  —  o  ,1=1  ZTi  —  1 

Page  186,  example  16.     The  value  of  f{x)  in  the  range  (g7r,  tt)  should  be  -^n,  not  ^rr. 

/z4-^\1n  /^  4. 1  \  4"' 

Page  320,  line  2,  for  (~^\     read  f^j      • 

Page  370,  line  1,  for  ''for  all  values  of  x'  read  '■vdth  limited  total  fluctuation.^  If  this 
condition  is  satisfied,  /'  {x)  may  be  written  as  the  difference  of  two  bounded  increasing 
functions ;  the  formula  defining  F{x)  then  shews  that  F{x)  is  the  difference  of  two 
such  functions,  and  so  F{x)  has  limited  total  fluctuation,  and  it  is  permissible  to 
apply  Fourier's  theorem.     See  also  Chapman,  Quarterly  Journal,  XLiii. 


PAET  I 

THE  PROCESSES  OF  ANALYSIS 


W.   M.  A, 


CHAPTER   I 

COMPLEX  NUMBERS 

I'l.     Rational  Numbers. 

The  idea  of  a  set  of  numbers  is  derived  in  the  first  instance  from  the 
consideration  of  the  set  of  positive*  integral  numbers,  or  positive  integers ; 
that  is  to  say,  the  numbers  1,  2,  3,  4, —  Positive  integers  have  many 
properties,  which  will  be  found  in  treatises  on  the  Theory  of  Integral 
Numbers ;  but  at  a  very  early  stage  in  the  development  of  mathematics 
it  was  found  that  the  operations  of  Subtraction  and  Division  could  only  be 
performed  among  them  subject  to  inconvenient  restrictions ;  and  consequently, 
in  elementary  Arithmetic,  classes  of  numbers  are  constructed  such  that  the 
operations  of  subtraction  and  division  can  always  be  performed  among  them. 

To  obtain  a  class  of  numbers  among  which  the  operation  of  subtraction 
can  be  performed  without  restraint  we  construct  the  class  of  integers,  which 
consists  of  the  class  of  positive^  integers  (+ 1,  +  2,  +  3,  ...)  and  of  the  class 
of  negative  integers  (— 1,  —  2,  —  3,  ...)  and  the  number  0. 

To  obtain  a  class  of  numbers  among  which  the  operations  both  of  sub- 
traction and  of  division  can  be  performed  freely:J:,  we  construct  the  class  of 
rational  numbers.  Symbols  which  denote  members  of  this  class  are  |,  3, 
u,  —-7-. 

We  have  thus  introduced  three  classes  of  numbers,  (i)  the  signless  integers, 
(ii)  the  integers,  (iii)  the  rational  numbers. 

It  is  not  part  of  the  scheme  of  this  work  to  discuss  the  construction  of 
the  class  of  integers  or  the  logical  foundations  of  the  theory  of  rational 
numbers  §. 

The  extension  of  the  idea  of  number,  which  has  just  been  described,  was  not  effected 
without  some  opposition  from  the  more  conservative  mathematicians.     In  the  latter  half 

*  Strictly  speaking,  a  more  appropriate  epithet  would  be,  not  positive,  but  signless. 

t  In  the  strict  sense. 

t  With  the  exception  of  division  by  the  rational  number  0. 

§  Such  a  discussion,  defining  a  rational  number  as  an  ordered  number-pair  of  integers  in  a 
similar  manner  to  that  in  which  a  complex  number  is  defined  in  §  1-3  as  an  ordered  number-pair 
of  real  numbers,  will  be  found  in  Hobson's  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable,  §§  1 — 12. 

1—2 


4  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  I 

of  the  18tli  century,  Maseres  (1731—1824)  and  Frend  (1757—1841)  published  works 
on  Algebra,  Trigonometry,  etc.,  in  which  the  use  of  negative  numbers  was  disallowed, 
although  Descartes  had  used  them  unrestrictedly  more  than  a  hundred  years  before. 

A  rational  number  x  may  be  represented  to  the  eye  in  the  following 
manner : 

If,  on  a  straight  line,  we  take  an  origin  0  and  a  fixed  segment  OP^ 
(Pi  being  on  the  right  of  0),  we  can  measure  from  0  a  length  OPx  such  that 
the  ratio  OPx/OPi  is  equal  to  cc;  the  point  Px  is  taken  on  the  right  or  left  of 
0  according  as  the  number  x  is  positive  or  negative.  We  may  regard  either 
the  point  Px  or  the  displacement  OPx  (which  will  be  written  OPx)  as  repre- 
senting the  number  x. 

All  the  rational  numbers  can  thus  be  represented  by  points  on  the  line, 
but  the  converse  is  not  true.  For  if  we  measure  off  on  the  line  a  length  OQ 
equal  to  the  diagonal  of  a  square  of  which  OP,  is  one  side,  it  can  be  proved 
that  Q  does  not  correspond  to  any  rational  number. 

Points  on  the  line  which  do  not  represent  rational  numbers  may  be  said  to  represent 
irrational  numbers ;   thus   the   point    Q    is    said   to    represent    the    irrational  number 

v/2  =  l"414213 But  while  such  an  explanation  of  the  existence  of  irrational  numbers 

satisfied  the  mathematicians  of  the  eighteenth  century  and  may  still  be  sufficient  for 
those  whose  interest  lies  in  the  applications  of  mathematics  rather  than  in  the  logical 
upbuilding  of  the  theory,  yet  from  the  logical  standpoint  it  is  improper  to  introduce 
geometrical  intuitions  to  supply  deficiencies  in  arithmetical  arguments ;  and  it  was 
shewn  by  Dedekind  in  1858  that  the  theory  of  irrational  numbers  can  be  established  on 
a  purely  arithmetical  basis  without  any  appeal  to  geometry. 

1'2.     Dedekind' s*  theory  of  irrational  numbers. 

The  geometrical  property  of  points  on  a  line  which  suggested  the  starting 
point  of  the  arithmetical  theory  of  irrationals  was  that,  if  all  points  of  a  line 
are  separated  into  two  classes  such  that  every  point  of  the  first  class  is  on 
the  right  of  every  point  of  the  second  class,  there  exists  one  and  only  one 
point  at  which  the  line  is  thus  severed. 

Following  up  this  idea,  Dedekind  considered  rules  by  which  a  separation 
or  section  of  all  rational  numbers  into  two  classes  can  be  made,  these  classes 
(which  will  be  called  the  X-class  and  the  P-class,  or  the  left  class  and  the 
right  class)  being  such  that  they  possess  the  following  properties : 

(i)     At  least  one  member  of  each  class  exists. 

(ii)  Every  member  of  the  X-class  is  less  than  every  member  of  the 
P-class. 

It  is  obvious  that  such  a  section  is  made  by  any  rational  number  x ;  and 
X  is  either  the  greatest  number  of  the  Z-class  or  the  least  number  of  the 

*  The  theory,  though  elaborated  in  1858,  was  not  published  before  the  appearance  of  Dede- 
kind's  tract,  Stetigkeit  und  irrationale  Zahlen,  Brunswick,  1872.  Other  theories  are  due  to 
Weierstrass  (see  von  Dantscher,  Die  Weierstrass' sche  Theorie  der  irrationalen  Zahlen)  and  Cantor 
(see  Math.  Ann.  Bd.  v.). 


1"2]  COMPLEX   NUMBERS  5 

J?-class.  But  sections  can  be  made  in  which  no  rational  number  x  plays  this 
part.  Thus,  since  there  is  no  rational  number*  whose  square  is  2,  it  is  easy 
to  see  that  we  may  form  a  section  in  which  the  iJ-class  consists  of  the  positive 
rational  numbers  whose  squares  exceed  2,  and  the  Z-class  consists  of  all 
other  rational  numbers. 

Then  this  section  is  such  that  the  i2-class  has  no  least  member  and  the 

X-class  has  no  greatest  member ;  for,  if  x  be  any  positive  rational  fraction, 

,         «(a^  +  6)    ,,  Ixi^-af)       ,     ,     „       (x'-iy  ,     , 

^^^  y^^^^T'  '^^^  y-''=~^^^  ^^^  2/^-2=(Wiy- ''  ^'  y 

and  2  are  in  order  of  magnitude ;  and  therefore  given  any  member  x  of  the 
Z-class,  we  can  always  find  a  greater  member  of  the  Z-class,  or  given  any 
member  x'  of  the  jR-cIass,  we  can  always  find  a  smaller  member  of  the 
jR-class,  such  numbers  being,  for  instance,  y  and  y ,  where  y'  is  the  same 
function  of  x'  as  y  of  x. 

If  a  section  is  made  in  which  the  i^-class  has  a  least  member  \i4 2,  or  if  the 
Z-class  has  a  greatest  member  ^1,  the  section  determines  a  rational-real 
number,  which  it  is  convenient  to  denote  by  the  samef  symbol  A2  or  A^. 

If  a  section  is  made,  such  that  the  jR-class  has  no  least  member  and  the 
Z-class  has  no  greatest  member,  the  section  determines  an  irrational-real 
numher\. 

If  X,  y  are  real  numbers  (defined  by  sections)  we  say  that  x  is  greater 
than  y  if  the  X-class  defining  x  contains  at  least  two§  members  of  the  ii-class 
defining  y. 

Let  a,  yS,  ...  be  real  numbers  and  let  A-y,  B^,  ...  be  any  members  of  the 
corresponding  Z-classes  while  J.2,  ^g,  . . .  are  any  members  of  the  corresponding 
jK-classes.  The  classes  of  which  A^,  A^,  ...  are  respectively  members  will  be 
denoted  by  the  symbols  (^1),  (A^),  .... 

Then  the  sum  (written  a  +  y8)  of  two  real  numbers  a  and  8  is  defined  as 
the  real  number  (rational  or  irrational)  which  is  determined  by  the  Z-class 
(Ai  +  B^)  and  the  i2-class  (^2  +  ^2)- 

It  is,  of  course,  necessary  to  prove  that  these  classes  determine  a  section  of  the  rational 
numbers.  It  is  evident  that  Ai  +  Bi<  A2  +  B2  and  that  at  least  one  member  of  each  of  the 
classes  (Ai  +  Bi),  {A2  +  B^)  exists.     It  remains  to  prove  that  there  is,  at  most,  one  rational 

*  For  if  pjq  be  such  a  number,  this  fraction  being  in  its  lowest  terms,  it  may  be  seen  that 
{2q-p)l{p-q)  is  another  such  number,  and  0<p-q<:q,  so  that 2^/2  is  not  in  its  lowest  terms. 
The  contradiction  implies  that  such  a  rational  number  does  not  exist. 

t  This  causes  no  confusion  in  practice. 

X  B.  A.  W.  Eussell  defines  the  class  of  real  numbers  as  actually  being  the  class  of  all  L-classes  ; 
the  class  of  real  numbers  whose  L-classes  have  a  greatest  member  corresponds  to  the  class  of 
rational  numbers,  and  though  the  rational-real  number  x  which  corresponds  to  a  rational  number 
X  is  conceptually  distinct  from  it,  no  confusion  arises  from  denoting  both  by  the  same  symbol. 

§  If  the  classes  had  only  one  member  in  common,  that  member  might  be  the  greatest 
member  of  the  L-ciass  of  x  and  the  least  member  of  the  iJ-class  of  ij. 


6  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  I 

number  which  is  greater  than  every  ^dj  +  5i  and  less  than  every  A2  +  B2;  suppose,  if  possible, 
that  there  are  two,  x  and  y  {y  >x).  Let  ai  be  a  member  of  {A  1)  and  let  a2  be  a  member 
of  (Jg) ;  and  let  ^be  the  integer  next  greater  than  (a2~^i)/{i  Cy~-^)}-     Take  the  last  of 

the  numbers  ai  + -^  {a^  — di),  (where  m  =  0,  1,  ...  N),  which  belongs  to  (^1)  and  the  first  of 

them  which  belongs  to  (J 2) ;  let  these  two  numbers  be  Cj,  c^.     Then 

C2-Ci  =  ^.(a2-«i)<i(y--»)- 

Choose  c?i,  c?2  in  a  similar  manner  from  the  classes  defining  ^;  then 

C'i  +  d^-Ci-di<y-x. 

But  c^  +  d^^y,  Ci  +  di^x,  and  therefore  C2  +  c?2  — <'i-<^i^2/~'^  j  '^e  have  therefore 
arrived  at  a  contradiction  by  supposing  that  two  rational  numbers  x,  y  exist  belonging 
neither  to  {A  +  B)  nor  to  (a  +  6). 

If  every  rational  number  belongs  either  to  the  class  {A■^^\-B■|)  or  to  the  class  {A2-\-B^, 
then  the  classes  {Ai+Bi),  {A^+B^)  define  an  irrational  number.  If  one  rational  number  x 
exists  belonging  to  neither  class,  then  the  Z-class  formed  by  x  and  (^i  +  ^i)  and  the 
i2-class  (Jj  +  ^g)  define  the  rational-real  number  x.  In  either  case,  the  number  defined 
is  called  the  sum  a  +  /3. 

The  difference  a  — jS  of  two  real  numbers  is  defined  by  the  Z-class  {Ai—B-^  and  the 
iE-class  {Ac^  —  Bi). 

The  product  of  two  positive  real  numbers  a,  /3  is  defined  by  the  ^-class  (-42-^2) 
and  the  Z-class  of  all  other  rational  numbers. 

The  reader  will  see  without  difficulty  how  to  define  the  product  of  negative  real  num- 
bers and  the  quotient  of  two  real  numbers  ;  and  further,  it  may  be  shewn  that  real 
numbers  may  be  combined  in  accordance  with  the  associative,  distributive  and  commuta- 
tive laws. 

The  aggregate  of  rational-real  and  irrational-real  numbers  is  called  the 
aggregate  of  real  numbers  ;  for  brevity,  rational-real  numbers  and  irrational- 
real  numbers  are  called  rational  and  irrational  numbers  respectively. 

1"3.     Complex  numbers. 

We  have  seen  that  a  real  number  may  be  visualised  as  a  displacement 
along  a  definite  straight  line.  If,  however,  P  and  Q  are  any  two  points  in  a 
plane,  the  displacement  PQ  needs  two  real  numbers  for  its  specification ;  for 
instance,  the  differences  of  the  coordinates  of  P  and  Q  referred  to  fixed 
rectangular  axes.  If  the  coordinates  of  P  be  (^,  77)  and  those  of  Q  (^  -f  a;,  77  -f  3/), 
the  displacement  PQ  may  be  described  by  the  symbol  \x,  y\  We  are  thus 
led  to  consider  the  association  of  real  numbers,  in  ordered*  pairs.  The  natural 
definition  of  the  sum  of  two  displacements  \x,  y\  [x,  y']  is  the  displacement 
which  is  the  result  of  the  successive  applications  of  the  two  displacements ; 
it  is  therefore  convenient  to  define  the  sum  of  two  number-pairs  by  the 
equation 

[x,  y]  +  [x,  y']=[x  +  x',y  +  y'\ 

*  The  order  of  the  two  terms  distinguishes  the  ordered  number-pair  [x,  y'\  from  the  ordered 
number-pair  [y,  x\. 


1-3]  COMPLEX   NUMBERS  7 

The  product  of  a  number-pair  and  a  real  number  x  is  then  naturally 
defined  by  the  equation 

x'  X  \x,  y\  =  \x'x,  x'y\    ■ 

We  are  at  liberty  to  define  the  product  of  two  number-pairs  in  any 
convenient  manner;  but  the  only  definition,  which  does  not  give  rise  to 
results  that  are  merely  trivial,  is  that  symbolised  by  the  equation 

[x,  y]  X  [x,  y']  =  [xx  -  yy',  xy  +  xy\ 

It  is  then  evident  that 

\x,  0]  X  \x\  2/']  =  \xx',  xy']  =  x  x  [x,  y'] 

and  [0,  y]  x  [x,  y]  =  [-  yy',  x'y]  =  yx[-  y,  x\ 

The  geometrical  interpretation  of  these  results  is  that  the  effect  of 
multiplying  by  the  displacement  \x,  0]  is  the  same  as  that  of  multiplying  by 
the  real  number  x ;  but  the  effect  of  multiplying  a  displacement  by  [0,  y] 
is  to  multiply  it  by  a  real  number  y  and  turn  it  through  a  right  angle. 

It  is  convenient  to  denote  the  number-pair  [x,  y]  by  the  compound 
symbol  x  +  iy ;  and  a  number-pair  is  now  conveniently  called  (after  Gauss) 
a  complex  number ;  in  the  fundamental  operations  of  Arithmetic,  the  complex 
number  x  +  iO  may  be  replaced  by  the  real  number  x  and,  defining  i  to  mean 
0  +  il,  we  have  i^  =  [0,  1]  x  [0,  1]  =  [—  1,  0] ;  and  so  i^  may  be  replaced  by  —  1. 

The  reader  will  easily  convince  himself  that  the  definitions  of  addition 
and  multiplication  of  number-pairs  have  been  so  framed  that  we  may  perform 
the  ordinary  operations  of  algebra  with  complex  numbers  in  exactly  the  same 
way  as  with  real  numbers,  treating  the  symbol  i  as  a  number  and  replacing 
the  product  ii  by  —  1  wherever  it  occurs. 

Thus  he  will  verify  that,  if  a,  b,  c  are  complex  numbers,  we  have 

a  +  b  =  b  +  a, 

ab  =  ba, 

(a  +  b)  +  c  =  a  +  (b  +  c), 

ab  .  c  =  a  .  be, 

a{b  +  c)  =  ab  +  ac, 

and  if  ab  is  zero,  then  either  a  or  6  is  zero. 

It  is  found  that  algebraical  operations,  direct  or  inverse,  when  applied  to 
complex  numbers,  do  not  suggest  numbers  of  any  fresh  type ;  the  complex 
number  will  therefore  for  our  purposes  be  taken  as  the  most  general  type 
of  number. 

The  introduction  of  the  complex  number  has  led  to  many  important  developments  in 
mathematics.  Functions  which,  when  real  variables  only  are  considered,  appear  as 
essentially  distinct,  are  seen   to  be  connected  when  complex  variables  are  introduced  : 


8  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  I 

thus  the  circular  functions  are  found  to  be  expressible  in  terms  of  exponential  functions 
of  a  complex  argument,  by  the  equations 

cos^  =  -(e''=^  +  e~"),     sin^=-^(e*^-e-"'). 

2  2^ 

Again,  many  of  the  most  important  theorems  of  modern  analysis  are  not  true  if  the 
ntimbers  concerned  are  restricted  to  be  real ;  thus,  the  theorem  that  every  algebraic 
equation  of  degree  n  has  n  roots  is  true  in  general  only  when  regarded  as  a  theorem 
concerning  complex  numbers. 

Hamilton's  quaternions  furnish  an  example  of  a  still  further  extension  of  the  idea 
of  number.     A  quaternion 

is  formed  from  four  real  numbers  w,  oo,  y,  z,  and  four  number-units  1,  i,  j,  k,  in  the  same 
way  that  the  ordinary  complex  number  x  +  iy  might  be  regarded  as  being  formed  from 
two  real  numbers  x,  y,  and  two  number-units  1,  i.  Quaternions  however  do  not  obey 
the  commutative  law  of  multiplication. 

1'4.     The  modulus  of  a  complex  number. 

Let  X  +  iy  be  a  complex  number,  x  and  y  being  real  numbers.  Then 
the  positive  square  root  of  x"^  +  y^  is  called  the  modulus  of  {x  +  iy),  and  is 
written 

\x  -\-iy\. 

Let  us  consider  the  complex  number  which  is  the  sum  of  two  given 
complex  numbers,  x  -f  iy  and  u  +  iv.     We  have 

{x  -f  iy)  -f  (w  +  iv)  =  {x -\- u)  -\- i  {y  +  v). 
The  modulus  of  the  sum  of  the  two  numbers  is  therefore 

[{x  +  uY  +  (y  +  vY]^, 

or  {{x^  +  2/0  +  {u^'  +  v^)  +  2  (xu  +  yv)]^. 

But 

{\x+iy\  +  \u  +  iv\Y=  {(x"^  +  y-)^  +  (u"^  +  v^^p 

=  (^2  +  2/0  +  (u^  +  V)  +  2{x''  +  2/0*  (u'  +  V)^ 

=  (x^  -f  2/0  +  (""  +  ^0  +  2  {(xu  +  yv)-  +  (xv  -  yuf]^, 

and  this  latter  expression  is  greater  than  (or  at  least  equal  to) 

{x"^  +  2/0  +  {u^  +  V')  +  2  {xu  -f  yv). 

We  have  therefore 

\  X  -\-  iy  \  -\-  \  u  +  iv  \'^  \  {x  -\-  iy)  +  {u  +  iv)  \ , 

i.e.  the  modulus  of  the  sum  of  two  complex  numbers  cannot  be  greater  than  the 
sum  of  their  moduli;  and  it  follows  by  induction  that  the  modulus  of  the  sum 
of  any  number  of  complex  numbers  cannot  be  greater  than  the  sum  of  their 
moduli. 


1-4,  1*5]  COMPLEX   NUMBERS  9 

Let  us  consider  next  the  complex  number  which  is  the  product  of  two 
given  complex  numbers,  x  +  iy  and  u-\-iv]  we  have 

{x  +  iy)  (u  +  iv)  =  {xu  —  yv)  +  i  (xv  +  yu), 
and  therefore 

I  {x  +  iy)  (u  +  iv)  I  =  {{xu  —  yvy  +  (xv  +  yuY}^ 

=  {{^  +  2/')  (w'  +  «')]* 

=  \x  +  iy\\u  +  iv\. 

The  modulus  of  the  product  of  two  complex  numbers  (and  hence,  by  in- 
duction, of  any  number  of  complex  numbers)  is  therefore  equal  to  the  product 
of  their  moduli. 

1"5.     The  Argand  diagram. 

We  have  seen  that  complex  numbers  may  be  represented  in  a  geometrical 
diagram  by  taking  rectangular  axes  Ox,  Oy  in  a  plane.  Then  a  point  P 
whose  coordinates  referred  to  these  axes  are  x,  y  may  be  regarded  as 
representing  the  complex  number  x  +  iy.  In  this  way,  to  every  point  of 
the  plane  there  corresponds  some  one  complex  number ;  and,  conversely,  to 
every  possible  complex  number  there  corresponds  one,  and  only  one,  point 
of  the  plane. 

The  complex  number  x  +  iy  may  be  denoted  by  a  single  letter*  z.  The 
point  P  is  then  called  the  representative  point  of  the  number  z;  we  shall 
also  speak  of  the  number  z  as  being  the  ajffix  of  the  point  P. 

If  we  denote  {x^  4-  y^Y  by  r  and  choose  6  so  that  r  cos  6  =  x,  r  sin  0  =  y, 
then  r  and  0  are  clearly  the  radius  vector  and  vectorial  angle  of  the  point  P, 
referred  to  the  origin  0  and  axis  Ox. 

The  representation  of  complex  numbers  thus  afforded  is  often  called  the 
Argand  diagramf. 

By  the  definition  already  given,  it  is  evident  that  r  is  the  modulus  of  z. 
The  angle  0  is  called  the  argument,  or  amplitude,  of  z. 

We  write  0  =  arg  z. 

From  geometrical  considerations,  it  appears  that  (although  the  modulus  of  a  complex 
number  is  unique)  the  argument  is  not  unique  J  ;  if  ^  be  a  value  of  the  argument,  the 
other  values  of  the  argument  are  comprised  in  the  expression  2nn  +  d  where  n  is  any 
integer,  not  zero.  The  priiidpal  value  of  arg  3  is  that  which  satisfies  the  inequality 
—  7r<arg2^7r. 

*  It  is  convenient  to  call  x  and  y  the  real  and  imaginary  parts  of  z  respectively.  We  fre- 
quently write  x  =  R{z),  y  =  I{z). 

t  J.  R.  Argand  published  it  in  1806 ;  it  had  however  previously  been  used  by  Gauss,  and 
by  Caspar  Wessel,  who  discussed  it  in  a  memoir  presented  to  the  Danish  Academy  in  1797  and 
published  by  that  Society  in  1798-9. 

X  See  the  Appendix. 


10  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  I 

If  Pj  and  Pg  are  the  representative  points  corresponding  to  values  z-^ 
and  z^  respectively  of  z,  then  the  point  which  represents  the  value  ^j  4  z^  is 
clearly  the  terminus  of  a  line  drawn  from  Pj,  equal  and  parallel  to  that 
which  joins  the  origin  to  Pj. 

To  find  the  point  which  represents  the  complex  number  z-^Z2,  where  z-^  and 
Z2  are  two  given  complex  numbers,  we  notice  that  if 

•s'l  =  r^  (cos  ^1  -F  i  sin  6^, 

Z2,  =  Tg  (cos  ^2  +  *  sin  ^2) 
then,  by  multiplication, 

z^z^  =  nrg  {cos  (^1  +  ^2)  +  *  sin  (^1  +  ^2)}- 

The  point  which  represents  the  number  z-^^z^  has  therefore  a  radius  vector 
measured  by  the  product  of  the  radii  vectores  of  Pj  and  Pg,  and  a  vectorial 
angle  equal  to  the  sum  of  the  vectorial  angles  of  Pj  and  Pg. 

REFERENCES. 

The  logical  foundations  of  the  theory  of  number. 

A.  N.  Whitehead  and  B.  A.  W.  Russell,  Principia  Mathematica. 

On  irrational  numbers. 

R.  Dedekind,  Stetigkeit  und  irrationale  Zahlen.     (Brunswick,  1872.) 

V.  VON  Dantscher,  Vorlesungen  ueber  die  Weierstrass'sche  Theorie  der  irrationalen 

Zahlen. 
E.  W.  HoBSON,  Functions  of  a  Real   Variable,  Ch.  i. 
T.  J.  I'a.  Bromwich,  Theory  of  Infinite  Series.,  Appendix  i. 

On  complex  numbers. 

H.  Hankel,  Theorie  der  complexen  Zahlen-systeme.     (Leipzig,  1867.) 
O.  Stolz,    Vorlesungen  iiber  allgemeine  Arithmetik,  li.     (Leipzig,  1886.) 
G.  H.  Hardy,  A  course  of  Pure  Mathematics.,  Ch.  in. 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that  the  representative  points  of  the  complex  numbers  l+4t,  2  +  7i,  3  +  10i, 
are  collinear. 

2.  Shew  that  a  parabola  can  be  drawn  to  pass  through  the  representative  points  of 
the  complex  numbers 

i  +  i,     4  +  4i,     6  +  9i,     8  +  16z,     10  +  25i. 

3.  Determine  the  nth  roots  of  unity  by  aid  of  the  Argand  diagram  ;  and  shew  that  the 
number  of  primitive  roots  (roots  the  powers  of  each  of  which  give  all  the  roots)  is  the 
number  of  integers  (including  unity)  less  than  n  and  prime  to  it. 

Prove  that  if  5,,  ^2)  ^3)  •••  be  the  arguments  of  the  primitive  roots,  2  cosp^  =  0  when 

n 
jo  is  a  positive  integer  less  than  ~r where  a,  b,  c, ...  k  are  the  different  constituent 

CtOC  » , »  tC 

primes  of  n  ;  and  that. 
the  constituent  primes 


primes  of  n  ;  and  that,  when  P  =  -, 7,  2  co>i  p6=  ~-^ — ,,  where  fi  is  the  number  of 


(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 


CHAPTER  II 

THE  THEORY  OF  CONVERGENCE 

2'1.     The  definition*  of  the  limit  of  a  sequence. 

Let  Zi,  z^,  Zz,  ...  be  an  unending  sequence  of  numbers,  real  or  complex. 
Then,  if  a  number  I  exists  such  that,  corresponding  to  every  p.ositivef 
number  e,  no  matter  how  small,  a  number  Wq  can  be  found,  such  that 

I  ^'n  —  ^  I  <  e 

for  all  values  of  n  greater  than  Wq,  the  sequence  {z^  is  said  to  tend  to  the  limit  I 
as  n  tends  to  infinity. 

Symbolic  forms  of  the  statement]:  '  the  limit  of  the  sequence  (^„),  as  n 
tends  to  infinity,  is  I '  are : 

lim  Zn  —  I,     lim  Zn  =  l,     Zn—^l  as  n—^  <x> . 

n-*'Oo 

If  the  sequence  be  such  that,  given  an  arbitrary  number  N  (no  matter 
how  large),  we  can  find  n^  such  that  |  ^^^  |  >  iV  for  all  values  of  n  greater  than 
rio,  we  say  that  '\zn\  tends  to  infinity  as  n  tends  to  infinity,'  and  we  write 

I  ^„  I  — ►   GO  . 

In  the  corresponding  case  when  —  Xn>  N  when  n  >  n^  we  say  that 
a;„  — >  —  00  . 

If  a  sequence  of  real  numbers  does  not  tend  to  a  limit  or  to  go  or  to  —  oo  , 
the  sequence  is  said  to  oscillate. 

2'11.     Definition  of  the  phrase  '  of  the  order  of 

If  (^n)  and  {Zri)  are  two  sequences  such  that  a  number  n^  exists  such  that 
I  i'^nlzn)  I  <  K  whenever  n  >  n^,  where  K  is  independent  of  n,  we  say  that  ^n  is 
*  of  the  order  of  Zn>  and  we  write  § 

?„  =  0  (zn) ; 

*  A  definition  equivalent  to  this  was  first  given  by  John  Wallis. 
t  The  number  zero  is  excluded  from  the  class  of  positive  numbers. 
X  The  arrow  notation  is  due  to  Leathern,  Camb.  Math.  Tracts,  no.  1. 
§  This  notation  is  due  to  Landau. 


12  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

thus  Mi+1?  =  0  f i 

1  +  W  \W 

If  lim  (^n/^n)  =  0,  we  write  ^n  =  o  (zn). 

2"2.     The  limit  of  an  increasing  sequence. 

Let  (xn)  be  a  sequence  of  real  numbers  such  that  Xn+i  ^  Xn  for  all  values 
of  n;  then  the  sequence  tends  to  a  limit  or  else  tends  to  infinity  (and  so  it  does 
not  oscillate). 

Let  cc  be  any  rational-real  number;  then  either: 

(i)  Xn'^x  for  all  values  of  n  greater  than  some  number  n^,  depending  on 
the  value  of  x. 

Or  (ii)  Xn<  X  for  every  value  of  n. 

If  (ii)  is  not  the  case  for  any  value  of  x  (no  matter  how  large),  then 

Xn—^<X>. 

But  if  values  of  x  exist  for  which  (ii)  holds,  we  can  divide  the  rational 
numbers  into  two  classes,  the  X-class  consisting  of  those  rational  numbers  x 
for  which  (i)  holds  and  the  i^-class  of  those  rational  numbers  x  for  which  (ii) 
holds.     This  section  defines  a  real  number  a,  rational  or  irrational. 

And  if  6  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number,  a  —  ^e  belongs  to  the  Z-class 
which  defines  a,  and  so  we  can  find  ?ii  such  that  Xn^o-  —  ^e  whenever  ti  >  Mj ; 
and  a+|e  is  a  member  of  the  -R-class  and  so  a;„<a4-^6.  Therefore, 
whenever  n>ni, 

\a  —  Xn\<€. 

Therefore  Xn  — >  a. 

Corollary.     A  decreasing  sequence  tends  to  a  limit  or  to  —  oo  . 

Example  1.     If  lim  Zm  =  li  lim  z^  =  l\  then  lim  (2m+2m')  =  ^+^'- 
For,  given  e,  we  can  find  n  and  n'  such  that 

(i)  when  m>n,  \  z^  —  l  \  <  ^e,     (ii)  when  m>n',  \  zj  -  ^'  |  <  Jf- 
Let  %i  be  the  greater  of  n  and  n'  ;  then,  when  ??i  >  rii , 

I  (2m  +  2„/)  -  {l  +  l')  1  ^  I  {Z,n-l)  I  +  I  (Zm'-l')  I , 

<f ; 

and  this  is  the  condition  that  lim  {zm  +  Zm')  =  l  +  l'. 

Example  2.      Prove  similarly  that  lim  (2^-2,„')  =  ^-^',  lim(2^2™')  =  ^^')  and,  if  Z'=t=0, 

lim(2,„/2^')  =  ^/^'- 

Example  3.     Ii  0  <  x  <\,  x^ -*-(). 
For  if  ^=(l  +  a)-i,  a>0  and 

0  <r'  r"  = <^ 

{l  +  aY      \+na' 

by  the  binomial  theorem  for  a  positive  integral  index.     And  it  is  obvious  that,  given  a 
positive  number  e,  we  can  choose  Mq  such  that  ( I  ^na)  ~  i  <  e  when  n>no\  and  so  x"^  -*►  0. 


22-2-22]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  13 

221.     The  Bolzano- Weierstrass*  theorem  on  limits  of  a  sequence. 

Let  (aJn)  be  a  sequence  of  real  numbers  such  that  X^Xn^p,  where  \,  p  are 
independent  of  n.  Then  the  sequence  has  at  least  one  '  limit-point '  G ;  that 
is  to  say,  there  exists  a  number  G  such  that,  if  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive 
number,  there  are  an  unlimited  number  of  terms  of  the  sequence  which  satisfy 

G-  €<  CCn<  G  +  e. 

For,  choose  a  section  in  which  (i)  the  ^-class  consists  of  all  the  rational 
numbers  which  are  such  that,  if  A  be  any  one  of  them,  there  are  only  a 
limited  number  of  terms  a;„  satisfying  Xn>  A;  and  (ii)  the  Z-class  is  such  that 
there  are  an  unlimited  number  of  terms  Xn  such  that  Xn>a  for  all  members  a 
of  the  X-class. 

This  section  defines  a  real  number  G ;  and,  if  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive 
number,  G  —  ^e  and  G  +  ^e  are  members  of  the  L  and  R  classes  respectively, 
and  so  there  are  an  unlimited  number  of  terms  of  the  sequence  satisfying 

G-e<  G-^€^Xn^G  +  ^€<  G+  e, 

which  is  the  result  stated. 

2*211.     Definition  of  '  the  greatest  of  the  limits.' 

The  number  G  obtained  in  §  2-21  is  called  'the  greatest  of  the  limits  of 
the  sequence  (Xn).'  The  sequence  (xn)  cannot  have  a  limit  point  greater 
than  G;  for  if  G' were  such  a  limit  point,  and  €  =  ^(G'—G),  G'  —  e  is  a 
member  of  the  i2-class  defining  G,  so  that  there  are  only  a  limited  number  of 
terms  of  the  sequence  which  satisfy  Xn>G'  —  e.  This  condition  is  incon- 
sistent with  G'  being  a  limit  point.     We  write 

G  =  lim  Xn . 
The  '  least  of  the  limits,'  L,  of  the  sequence  (written  lim  Xn)  is  defined  by  the 

equation 

Iim  (—  Xn)  —  —  L. 

2"22.  Cauchy's-f  theorem  on  the  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for 
the  existence  of  a  limit. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  the  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for  the 
existence  of  a  limiting  value  of  a  sequence  of  numbers  z^,  z^,  z-^,  ...  is  that, 
corresponding  to  any  given  positive  number  e,  however  small,  it  shall  be 
possible  to  find  a  number  n  such  that 


■"n-\-p 


—  Zn  \  <  € 


for  all  positive  integral  values  of  p.     This  result  is  one  of  the  most  important 

*  This  theorem,  frequently  ascribed  to  Weierstrass,  was  proved  by  Bolzano,  Paradoxien  des 
Unendlichen  (1851).     It  seems  to  have  been  known  to  Cauchy. 
t  Analyse  Algebraique,  p.  125. 


14  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

and  fundamental  theorems  of  analysis.     It  is  sometimes  called  the  Principle 
of  Convergence. 

First,  we  have  to  shew  that  this  condition  is  necessary,  i.e.  that  it  is 
satisfied  whenever  a  limit  exists.  Suppose  then  that  a  limit  I  exists ;  then 
(§  2'1)  corresponding  to  any  positive  number  e,  however  small,  a  number  n 
can  be  chosen  such  that 

i  ^n  -  ^  I  <  ie,     I  Zn+p  -l\<^e, 
for  all  positive  values  of  p ;  therefore 

I  ^n+p  -Zn\  =  \  (^n+p  -I)  —  {^n  —  I)  \ 

^  I  Zn+p  —l\  +  \Zn—l\<e, 

which  shews  the  necessity  of  the  condition 

I  ^n+p       ^n  I  "^  ^j 

and  thus  establishes  the  first  half  of  the  theorem. 

Secondly,  we  have  to  prove*  that  this  condition  is  sufficient,  i.e.  that  if 
it  is  satisfied,  then  a  limit  exists. 

(I)  Suppose  that  the  sequence  of  real  numbers  (ocn)  satisfies  Cauchy's 
condition ;  that  is  to  say  that,  corresponding  to  any  positive  number  e,  a 
number  n  can  be  chosen  such  that 

I  '^n+p       '^n  I  "^  ^ 

for  all  positive  integral  values  of  ^. 

Let  the  value  of  n,  corresponding  to  the  value  1  of  e,  be  m. 

Let  Xi,  pi  be  the  least  and  greatest  o( {v^,  x^,  ...  Xm]  then 

\-l<Xn<  pi  +  1, 

for  all  values  of  n ;  write  Xj  —  1  =  X,,  p^  +  \  =  p. 

Then,  for  all  values  of  n,  \  <  Xn<  p.  Therefore  by  the  theorem  of  §  2"21, 
the  sequeiice  {x^}  has  at  least  one  limit  point  G. 

Further,  there  cannot  be  more  than  one  limit  point ;  for  if  there  were 
two,  G  and  H  (H  <  G),  take  e  <  l(G  —  H).  Then,  by  hypothesis,  a  number 
n  exists  such  that  j  x^+p  —  Xn\<€  for  every  positive  value  of  p.  But  since  G 
and  H  are  limit  points,  positive  numbers  q  and  r  exist  such  that 

!  G  —  Xn+q  \<  e,    \H  —  Xn+r  |  <  6. 
Then        j  G  —  X^+q  \  +  \  X^+q  —  Xn\  +  \  X^  —  X^+r  I  +  I  OCn+r  —  H  \  <  ^e. 

But,  by  §  1-4,  the  sum  on  the  left  is  greater  than  or  equal  to  \G—  H\. 
Therefore  G  -  H  <  4>e. 

But  e  was  chosen  so  that  e<^{G  —  H). 
*  This  proof  is  given  by  Stolz  and  Gmeiner,  Theoretische  Arithmetik,  Bd.  ii.  (1902),  p.  144. 


23]  THE  THEORY  OF  CONVERGENCE  16 

Hence,  by  assuming  the  existence  of  two  limit  points,  we  have  arrived  at 
a  contradiction.  Therefore  there  is  but  one  ;  that  is  to  say,  the  limit  of  (a;„) 
exists. 

(II)  Now  let  the  sequence  {zr^  of  real  or  complex  numbers  satisfy 
Cauchy's  condition  ;  and  let  Zn  =  Xn  +  iyn,  where  Xn  and  y„  are  real ;  then  for 
all  values  of  n  and  p 

I  ^nr^       ^n  I  ^  I  ^n+p       ^n\}     \  yn+p  ~  yn\  ^  \  ^n+p  ~  ^n\' 

Therefore  the  sequences  of  real  numbers  (xn)  and  (yn)  satisfy  Cauchy's 
condition ;  and  so,  by  (I),  the  limits  of  (xn)  and  (yn)  exist.  Therefore,  by 
§  2  2  example  1,  the  limit  of  (zn)  exists.     The  result  is  therefore  established. 

2'3.     Convergence  of  an  infinite  series. 

Let  Wi,  Wj,  Wj,  ...  Un, ...  be  a  sequence  of  numbers,  real  or  complex.  Let 
the  sum 

U1  +  U2+  ...+Un 

be  denoted  by  Sn- 

Then,  if  Sn  tends  to  a  limit  S  as  n  tends  to  infinity,  the  infinite  series 

^1  +  ^2  +  ^3  +  ^*4+  •.. 

is  said  to  be  convergent,  or  to  converge  to  the  sum  S.  In  other  cases,  the 
infinite  series  is  said  to  be  divergent.  When  the  series  converges,  the 
expression  S  —  Sn,  which  is  the  sum  of  the  series 

'^n+i  +  ^n+2  +  ^n-t-3  +  •  •  • , 

is  called  the  remainder  after  n  terms,  and  is  frequently  denoted  by  the 
symbol  Rn. 

The  sum     ' w„+i  +  w„+2  +  • .  •  +  ^n+p 

will  be  denoted  by  Sn,p. 

It  follows  at  once,  by  combining  the  above  definition  with  the  results 
of  the  last  paragraph,  that  the  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for  the 
convergence  of  an  infinite  series  is  that,  given  an  arbitrary  positive  number  e, 
we  can  find  n  such  that  j  8n,p  |  <  e  for  every  positive  value  of  p. 

Since  u^+i  —  Sn,i>  i^  follows  as  a  particular  case  that  lim  Un+i  =  0 — in  other 
words,  the  nth  term  of  a  convergent  series  must  tend  to  zero  as  n  tends  to 
infinity.  But  this  last  condition,  though  necessary,  is  not  sufficient  in  itself 
to  ensure  the  convergence  of  the  series,  as  appears  from  a  study  of  the  series 

11111 

1+2  +  3  +  4+5+--- 

In  this  series,  'Sfn.n  =  ^1  +  ;^2 +  ,TT3  +  •■•  +  i- 

The  expression  on  the  right  is  diminished  by  writing  (2n)~^  in  place  of 
each  term,  and  so  Sn,n  >  i- 


16  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

Therefore        S2n^i  =  l+Sj^^+ 8^,2  + S,,i  + Ss,s  +  S,e,i6  + '•■  +  S^n^^"" 

>  2  (»?  +  3)  -»  00  ; 

the  series  is  therefore  divergent. 

There  are  two  general  classes  of  problems  which  we  are  called  upon  to 
investigate  in  connexion  with  the  convergence  of  series : 

(i)  We  may  arrive  at  a  series  by  some  formal  process,  e.g.  that  of 
solving  a  linear  differential  equation  by  a  series,  and  then  to  justify  the 
process  it  will  usually  have  to  be  proved  that  the  series  thus  formally  ob- 
tained is  convergent.  Simple  conditions  for  establishing  convergence  in 
such  circumstances  are  obtained  in  §§  2"31-2"61. 

(ii)     Given  an  expression  8,  it  may  be  possible  to  obtain  a  development 

n 

8=  S  Um,-^  Rn,  valid  for  all  values  of  n ;  and,  from  the  definition  of  a  limit, 

m  =  \ 

00 

it  follows  that,  if  we  can  prove  that  Rn  -^  0,  then  the  series  S  Um  converges 

m=l 

and  its  sum  is  8.     An  example  of  this  problem  occurs  in  §  5'4. 

Infinite  series  were  used  by  Lord  Brouncker  in  Phil.  Trans.  1668,  and  the  expressions 
convergent  and  divergent  were  introduced  by  James  Gregory,  Professor  of  Mathematics 
at  Edinburgh,  in  the  same  year.  But  the  great  mathematicians  of  the  18th  century  used 
infinite  series  freely  without,  for  the  most  part,  considering  the  question  of  their  con- 
vergence.    Thus  Euler  gave  the  sum  of  the  series 


as  zero,  on  the  ground  that 


■  +  ^  +  ^  +  J  +  ^  +  '+^'  +  ''  + (^) 


«  +  22  +  2H...  =  j^    (6) 


and  1  +  -+     +,..  =  ^ ^(c). 

The  error  of  course  arises  from  the  fact  that  the  series  (6)  converges  only  when  |  2  |  <  1, 
and  the  series  (c)  converges  only  when  |  ^  |  >  1,  so  the  series  (a)  does  not  converge  for  any 
value  of  z. 

The  modern  theory  of  convergence   may  be  said  to   date   from   the   publication  of 

Gauss'  Disquisitiones  circa  seriem  infinitam  \+—^x  +...  in  1812,  and  Cauchy's  Analyse 

1  .y 

Algebraique  in  1821.     See  Reiff,  Oeschichte  der  unendlichen  Reihen  (Tubingen,  1889). 


2-301.     Abel's  inequality*. 

I   ^ 
Let  fn  >  fn+x  >  0  for  all  integer  values  of  n.     Then  \   2   a„/n   :$  Af,  where 

A  is  the  greatest  of  the  sums 

\ax\,  I  ffi +  a2M  «'i  +  tt2  +  a3 1,  ...,   i  «!  + tt2+ ...  +  a^  I- 


*  Crelle's  Journal,  Bd.  i.  (1826),  pp.  311-339.     A  particular  case  of  the  theorem  of  §  2-31, 
Corollary  (i),  also  appears  in  that  memoir. 


2301,  2-31]  THE   THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  17 

For,  writing  aj  +  ag  +  . . .  +  ctn  =  *»i.  we  have 

m 

2    anfn  =  «i/i  +  («2  -  Si)/2  +  («3  -  h)f3  +  ...+iSm-  Sm--)fm 
n  =  l 

^^^  *i  \J\  ~J2)  "^  *2  (y  2  ~Ja)  +  . .  •  +  *m-i  \Jm—\  ~  Jm)  "I"  ^mjm- 

Since  /i  —fiifi—fs,  ■'•  s-re  not  negative,  we  have,  when  ri=  2,  3,  ...  m, 

1  5„_,  I  (/n-i  -fn)  ^  -4  (/„_i  -/n)  5    also  |  S^  \fm  ^  ^fm, 

and  so,  summing  and  using  §  1*4,  we  get 


•^   ^njn 


^Af,. 


Corollary.     If  aj,  ag*  •••  ^i>  ^2j  •••  'ire  any  numbers,  real  or  complex, 

m  I  fm—l  "j 


where  A  is  the  greatest  of  the  sums      2  a„ 


,  (p=l,  2,  ...  w). 


(Hardy.) 


2"31.     Dirichlet's*  test  for  convergence. 


Let  I  S  an 


K,  where  K  is  independent  of  p.      Then,  if  fn  ^fn+i  >  0 


and  lim/„  =  Of,    S  «„/„  converges. 

M  =  l 

For,  since  lim/,j  =  0,  given  an  arbitrary  positive  number  e,  we  can  find  m 
such  that  fm+i  <  €/2K. 


Then 


m+q 


m+q 

m 

^ 

S  an 

+ 

S  an 

n  =  \ 

M=l 

<  '2K,  for  all  positive  values  of  q  ;  so 


that,  by  Abel's  inequality,  we  have,  for  all  positive  values  of  p, 


m+p  1 


where  A  <  2K. 
Therefore 


'  n=m+l 


m+p 


S      a-nfn    <  ^Kfm+i  <  e  ;  and  so,  by  §  2-3,   S  a„/„  converges. 


n=m+l 

Corollary  (i).     Abel's  test  for  convergence.     If  2  «„  converges  and  the  sequence  (m„)  is 

jt=i 

monotonia   (i.e.    w„^%  +  i   always   or   else   M„^i<„  +  i   always)  and   |  li^ !  <  k,  where  <  is 
independent  of  n,  then  2  «„?<„  converges. 

For,  by  §  2'2,  «„  tends  to  a  limit  u;  let  [m— ?;„[=/„.  Then /,(-^0  steadily  ;  and 
therefore  2  «„/„  converges.     But,  if  (m,i)  is  an  increasing  sequence,  fn  =  u-u,i,  and  so 

2   (?(  — ?t„)  a,j  converges  ;  therefore  since    2   ««„  converges,   2  «„a,i  converges.     If  (?<„)  is 
11=1  (t=i  }i  =  i 

a  decreasing  sequence /ii  =  m,i  -  «,  and  a  similar  proof  holds. 

*  Liouville's  Journal,  ser.  2,  t.  vii.  pp.  253-255.  Before  the  publication  of  the  2nd  edition 
of  Jordan's  Conrs  d" Analyse,  Dirichlet's  test  and  Abel's  test  were  frequently  jointly  described 
as  tbe  Diricblet-Abel  test,  see  e.g.  Pringsheim,  Math.  Ann.  xxv.  p.  423. 

t  lu  these  circumstances,  we  say/„-*-0  steadily. 

W.   M.   A.  2 


18  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

Corollary  (ii).      Taking  «„  =  (-)"-!  in  Dirichlet'«  test,  it    follows   that,  if /„  >/„  +  ] 
and  lim/„  =  0,  /1-/2+/3-/4+  ■••  converges. 

Example   1.     Shew   that   if  0<^<27r,      2  sin  ?«5  < cosec  i^  ;  and   deduce  that,  if 

f^-^Q  steadily,  2  /„  sin  n6  converges  for  all  real  values  of  6,  and  that   2  fn cos  n6  con- 

n=l  »=i' 

verges  if  6  is  not  an  even  multiple  of  tt. 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  if  /«-*0  steadily,  2  (--)"•/■„  cos  7i^  converges  if  6  is  real  and 

n  =  l 

X 

not  an  odd  multiple  of  it  and  2  (  -  )"/„  sin  nd  converges  for  all  real  values  of  6.     [Write 
7r  +  ^  for  ^  in  example  1.] 

2'32.     Absolute  and  conditional  convergence. 

In  order  that  a  series   S  u^  of  real  or  complex  terms  may  converge,  it  is 

n  =  l 

00 
sufficient   (but   not   necessary)   that   the   series   of   moduli     S  ]  w„  ]    should 

00 

converge.    For,  if  crn,p  =  j  w^+i  |  +  |  Wn+2  j  +  •  •  •  +  |  w„+^  |  and  if  2  i  if^  |  converges, 

M=l 

we  can  find  n,  corresponding  to  a  given  number  e,  such  that  an,p  <  e  for  all 

oc 

values  of  p.     But  \Sn,p\^a'n,p<  e,  and  so    X  w„  converges. 

The  condition  is  not  necessary;  for  writing /„  =  l/n  in  §  2'31,  corollary  (ii), 
we  see  that  x  —  2  "^  3  ~"  4  "^  ••"  converges,  though  (§  23)  the  series  of  moduli 

1+9  +  3  +  1  +  .. .    is    known   to  diverge. 

In  this  case,  therefore,  the  divergence  of  the  series  of  moduli  does  not 
entail  the  divergence  of  the  series  itself 

Series,  which  are  such  that  the  series  formed  by  the  moduli  of  their  terms 
are  convergent,  possess  special  properties  of  great  importance,  and  are  called 
absolutely  convergent  series.  Series  which  though  convergent  are  not  abso- 
lutely convergent  (i.e.  the  series  themselves  converge,  but  the  series  of  moduli 
diverge)  are  said  to  be  conditionally  convergent. 

2'33.     The  geometric  series,  and  the  series    S  — . 

The  convergence  of  a  particular  series  is  in  most  cases  investigated,  not 
by  the  direct  consideration  of  the  sum  Sn,p,  but  (as  will  appear  from  the 
following  articles)  by  a  comparison  of  the  given  series  with  some  other  series 
which  is  known  to  be  convergent  or  divergent.  We  shall  now  investigate 
the  convergence  of  two  of  the  series  which  are  most  frequently  used  as 
standards  for  comparison. 


2-32,  2-33]  THE   THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  19 

(I)  The  geometric  series. 

The  geometric  series  is  defined  to  be  the  series 

Consider  the  series  of  moduli 

for  this  series  ,Sf„,p  =  |  ^  | "+^  + 1  ^^  | "+2  +  . . .  +  |  ^  | "+^ 

1  —  l^'l 

Hence,  if  |2^|<  1,  then  Sn,p<  \ —  ^ — 1  foi'  all  values  of  p,  and,  by  §  2*2 
example  3,  given  any  positive  number  e,  we  can  find  n  such  that 

I  ^  I  «+i  {1  -  I  ^  I  }-i  <  e. 

Thus,  given  e,  we  can  find  n  such  that,  for  all  values  of  p,  Sn,  p<  e.     Hence, 
'  by  §  2"22,  the  series 

1  +  1^1  +  1^1^  +  ... 

is  convergent  so  long  as  |  ^^  |  <  1,  and  therefore  the  geometric  series  is  absolutely 

convergent  if\z\<l. 

When  1 2^  I  ^  1,  the  terms  of  the  geometric  series  do  not  tend  to  zero  as  w 
tends  to  infinity,  and  the  series  is  therefore  divergent. 

(II)  The  series    1^  +  ^^  +  -+^^  +  -+.... 

n      \ 

Consider  now  the  series  8^=   S  —  ,  where  s  is  positive. 

AIT        1.  112  1 

We  have  __^  4  _  <  _  <  _  , 

11114        1 

4«  ^  5s  ^  (js  ^  7s  "-  4«  ^  4.S-1 ' 

and  so  on.     Thus  the  sum  of  2^  —  1  terms  of  the  series  is  less  than 

J_        1_      J_      J_  _1 1 

p-i  ~^  2«~i      4«-i      8*~'  +  •••  +  2(i'-i)  <«-!)      1  —  2'~' ' 

and  so  the  sum  of  any  number  of  terms  is  less  than  (1  —  2^"*)"^     Therefore 

n 

the  increasing  sequence  X  wi~*  cannot  tend  to  infinity ;  therefore,  by  §  2'2, 

>w  =  l 

«   1 

the  series  S   —  is  convergent  if  s  >1  ;  and  since  its  terms  are  all  real  and 

positive,  they  are  equal  to  their  own  moduli,  and  so  the  series  of  moduli  of 
the  terms  is  convergent ;  that  is,  the  convergence  is  absolute. 

2 2 


20  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

If  s  =  1,  the  series  becomes 

1111 

1  +  2  +  3+4"''  •••' 

which  we  have  ah-eady  shewn  to  be  divergent ;  and  when  5  <  1,  it  is  a  fortiori 
divergent,  since  the  effect  of  diminishing  s  is  to  increase  the  terms  of  the 

"    1    . 

series.     The  series    X  —  is  therefore  divergent  if  s  ^1. 

«.  =  !  "^ 

2'34.     The  GoTnparison  Theorem. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  a  series  Ui  +  u^-^-  u^-^  ...  is  absolutely  con- 
vergent, provided  that  \  Un  \  is  always  less  than  C  \vn\,  where  C  is  some  number 
independent  of  n,  and  v^  is  the  nth  term  of  another  series  which  is  known  to 
be  absolutely  convergent. 

For,  under  these  conditions,  we  have 

I  1A„+i  I  +  I  Wn+2  I  +  ...  +  I  Un+p  \<G  [\  Vn+i  j  +  |  Vn+2  |  +  ...  +  j  Vn^p\], 

where  n  and  p  are  any  integers.  But  since  the  series  ^Vn  is  absolutely 
convergent,  the  series  S  |  Vn  |  is  convergent,  and  so,  given  e,  we  can  find  n 
such  that 

I  -y/i+i  1  +  1  V«+2  I  +  •  •  •  +  I  ^n+p  I  <  ejC, 

for  all  values  of  p.     It  follows  therefore  that  we  can  find  n  such  that 

I  ?t«+i  i  +  I  'fn+2  I  +  . . .  +  I  Ww+p  i  <  e, 

for  all  values  of  p,  i.e.  the  series  S  |  Wn  |  is  convergent.  The  series  %Un  is 
therefore  absolutely  convergent. 

Corollary.  A  series  is  absolutely  couvergent  if  the  ratio  of  its  nih.  term  to  the 
nth.  term  of  a  series  which  is  known  to  be  absolutely  convergent  is  less  than  some 
number  independent  of  n. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  the  series 

cos  S  + J-,  cos  22  +  -;,  C0S32  +  — ;COS42  +  ... 
Z-  6^  V' 

is  absolutely  convergent  for  all  real  values  of  z. 

cos  nz 


When  z  is   real,  we   have  |  cos  nz  j  ^  1,  and  therefore 


n" 


<-T, .    The  moduli  of 
n- 

the  terms  of  the  given  series  are  therefore  less  than,  or  at  most  equal  to,  the  corresponding 

terms  of  the  series 

n      1       1        1 

l  +  ^  +  ^  +  _+..., 

which   by    §   2'33   is   absolutely  convergent.     The  given    series   is   therefore  absolutely 
convergent. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  the  series 

1111 


P(2-2l)         2^(2-22)         3^2-03)         4^(2-24) 

where                                                               2„  =  e»S               (yi  =  l,  2,  3,  ...) 
is  convergent  for  all  values  of  2,  except  the  values  z  =  zy^^  z^,  z-j, 


2*34,  2*35]  THE   THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  »  21 

The  geometric  representation  of  complex  numbers  is  helpful  in  discussing  a  question  of 
this  kind.  Let  values  of  the  complex  number  z  be  represented  on  a  plane;  then  the 
numbers  2i,  z^.,  z^, ...  will  give  a  sequence  of  points  which  lie  on  the  circumference  of  the 
circle  whose  centre  is  the  origin  and  whose  radius  is  unity  ;  and  it  can  be  shewn  that 
every  point  on  the  circle  is  a  limiting  point  (§  2'21)  of  the  points  2„. 

For  these  special  values  z„  of  z,  the  given  series  does  not  exist,  since  the  denomi- 
nator of  the  nth  term  vanishes  when  z  =  Zn-  For  simplicity  we  do  not  discuss  the  series 
for  any  point  z  situated  on  the  circumference  of  the  circle  of  radius  unity. 

Suppose  now  that  l^j  +  l.  Then  for  all  values  of  n,  i  2-2„  |  ^  |  {1 -|  2  |}  ]  >c~i,  for 
some  value  of  c ;  so  the  moduli  of  the  terms  of  the  given  series  are  less  than  the  corre- 
sponding terms  of  the  series 

which  is  known  to  be  absolutely  convergent.     The  given   series  is  therefore  absolutely 
convergent  for  all  values  of  z,  except  those  which  are  on  the  circle  |  2  |  =  1. 

It  is  interesting  to  notice  that  the  area  in  the  2-plane  over  which  the  series  converges 
is  divided  into  two  parts,  between  which  there  is  no  intercommunication,  by  the  circle 

\z\  =  l. 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  series 

2  sin --I-4  sin --f  8  sin  — -h ... +  2"  sin  j^-f ... 

converges  absolutely  for  all  values  of  2. 

Since*  lim  3"  sin  (2/3") =2,  we  can  find  a  number  fr,  independent  of  n  (but  depending 
on  2)  such  that  |  3" fein  (2/3")  \<k  ;  and  therefore 

2«szn-|<^(- 
Since  2^(5)    converges,  the  given  series  converges  absolutely. 

n=l      \<5/ 

2"35.     Gauchys  convergency  test'f. 

00 

//    lim  \un\'^'^<  1,    S  Un  converges  absolutely. 

n  — *-  ao  n  =  1 

For  we  can  find  m  such  that,  when  n^m,   \Un\^'^  ^  p  <  I,  where  p  is 

00 

independent  of  n.    Then;  when  n  >m,  |  m„  |  <  p'* ;  and  since      %    p"  converges, 

X  /  00  \ 

it  follows   from   §  2-34   that     S      Un   (and  therefore  %  iin]    converges   ab- 
solutely. 

[Note.  If  lim  |m„|^"*>1,  m„  does  not  tend  to  zero,  and,  by  §  2-3,  2  u^  does  not 
converge.] 

*  This  is  evident  from  results  proved  in  the  Appendix. 
t  Oeuvres  Mathematiques,  ser.  1,  t.  viii.  p.  270. 


22  ^  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

2'36.     D'Alembert's*  ratio  test. 
We  shall  now  shew  that  a  series 

til  +  ?«2  +  ^'3  +  W4  +  ... 

is  absolutely  convergent,  provided  that  for  all  values  of  n  greater  than  some 
fixed  value  r,  the  ratio   j-^^    is  less  than  p,  where  p  is  a  positive  number 
independent  of  n  and  less  than  unity. 
For  the  terms  of  the  series 

I  i<r+l  I  +  I  U-,.j^2  I  +  i  ?''r+3  I  +  . . . 

are  respectively  less  than  the  corresponding  terms  of  the  series 

|m,.+J(1+/J  +  /32  +  P=^+...), 

00 

which  is  absolutely  convergent  when  p  <\;  therefore  S  Un  (and  hence 
the  given  series)  is  absolutely  convergent. 

A  particular  case  of  this  theorem  is  that  if  lim  j  (wm+i/ww)|  =  ^  <  1,  the 
series  is  absolutely  convergent. 

For,  by  the  definition  of  a  limit,  we  can  find  r  such  that 

!^!f!i±j|_A|<l(l_/),whenJi>;-, 
and  then  I  !^i|  <  J  (1  +  ^)<  1 

n 

when  n  >  r. 

[Note.     If  lim  1 2/„  +  i-7-?f„  [>  1,  Un  does  not  tend  to  zero,  and,  by  §  2-3,  2  m„  does  not 

n=l 

converge.] 

Example  1.     If  |  c  |  <  1,  shew  that  the  series 

M=l 

converges  absohitely  for  all  values  of  z. 

[For  i(„  +  iK  =  c<'*+^)'-^'%^  =  c2»+i  e^-*0,  as  k-*  oo,  if  |  c  |  <  1.] 
Example  2.     Shew  that  the  series 

,,«-6  ,(a-b){a-2b)   „     (« -6)  (a- 26)  (a -36)  , 

converges  absolutely  if  |  s  |  <  [  6  [  ~  ^. 

[For'^^^^^^^-'^^s-^ 
!6^|<1,  i.e.  |2!<|6j-i.] 


rri      ''f»  +  i      a  —  nh 

'-     ''~!<~~  n  +  l  ^'^~     '   *^   >i-*«  ;   so   the  condition  for  absolute   convergence  is 


Opuscules,  t.  V.  (1768),  pp.  171-182. 


2-36,  2-37] 


THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE 


23 


Example  3.     Shew  that  the  series    2   — — j- zr^^n  converges  absolutely  if  \z\<\. 

n-  I 
[For,  when  |«|<1,  |  i»- (l  +  «-»)»  |  >  (l+»-i)»-|  s"  |  >  1 +  I  +  -2- +...  -  1  >1,  so  the 

moduli  of  the  terms  of  the  series  are  less  than  the  corresponding  terms  of  the  series 
00 
2  « |2"~i  I ;  but  this  latter  series  is  absolutely  convergent,  and  so  the  given  series  con- 

n  =  l 

verges  absolutely.] 

2'37.     A  general  theorem  on  series  for  which    lim    -^^ 

It  is  obvious  that  if,  for  all  values  of  n  greater  than  some  fixed  value  r, 
I  Un+1 1  is  greater  than  \Un  \,  then  the  terms  of  the  series  do  not  tend  to  zero  as 


=  1. 


tends  to 


/I  -*-  00 ,  and  the  series  is  therefore  divergent.     On  the  other  hand,  if 

is  less  than  some  number  which  is  itself  less  than  unity  and  independent 
of  n  (when  n  >  r),  we  have  shewn  in  §  2"o6  that  the  series  is  absolutely  con- 
vergent. The  critical  case  is  that  in  which,  as  n  increases, 
the  value  unity.  In  this  case  a  further  investigation  is  necessary. 
We  shall  now  shew  that*  a  series  Ui+  U2  +  Us+  ...,  in  which  lim 
will  be  absolutely  convergent  if  a  positive  number  c  exists  such  that 

I  '^71+ 1 


=  1, 


lim  n 

n-^  CO 


-1     =-1 


For,  compare  the  series  ^  |  m^  j  with  the  convergent  series  ^v„,  where 

Vn  =  An-^-^^' 
and  J.  is  a  constant ;  we  have 


Vn 


n  +  1 


^^*'=ri  +  iv'''*'=i-~v±-i%o 


As  n  -*  CO  , 


n{^^-l[--l-ic, 

i   Vn  ) 


and  hence  we  can  find  m  such  that,  when  n  >  m, 


By  a  suitable  choice  of  the  constant  A,  we  can  therefore  secure  that  for 
all  values  of  n  we  shall  have 

\Un\<  Vn. 

As  ^Vn  is  convergent,  S  j  w„  |   is  also  convergent,  and  so  l,Un  is  absolutely 

convergent. 

*  This  is  the  second  (D'Alembert's  theorem  given  in  §  2-36  being  the  first)  of  a  hierarchy  of 
theorems  due  to  De  Morgan.  See  Chrystal,  Algebra,  Chap.  xxvi.  for  an  historical  account  of 
these  theorems. 


24 


THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  II 


Corollary.     If  K^  =1  +  — +  0(-J   where    A^  is  independent   of  n, 
then  the  series  is  absolutely  convergent  if  A^<  —  1. 


Example.     Investigate  the  convergence  of  2  «'"  exp  (  —  ^  2  —  ] ,  when  r>  k  and  when 
?•  <  ^. 

2"38.     Convergence  of  the  hypergeometric  series. 

The  theorems  which  have  been  given  may  be  illustrated  by  a  discussion 
of  the  convergence  of  the  hypergeometric  series 

a.h         a(a+l)b(b  +  l)   ^      a(a  +  l)(a  +  2)b(b  +  l)(b+2)   ^ 
^l.c"""^     1.2.c(c  +  l)  1.2.3.c(c  +  l)(c  +  2)        ^  + '•■> 

which  is  generally  denoted  by  i''  (a,  6 ;  c ;  z). 

If  c  is  a  negative  integer,  all  the  terms  after  the  (1  -  c)th  have  zero 
denominators;  and  if  either  a  or  6  is  a  negative  integer  the  series  will 
terminate  at  the  (1  —  a)th  or  (1  —  6)th  term  as  the  case  may  be.  We  shall 
suppose  these  cases  set  aside,  so  that  a,  b,  and  c  are  assumed  not  to  be 
negative  integers. 
In  this  series 


(a  +  n-l){b-\-n-l) 


I  n{c  +  n—\)  I 

as  ?i  ^  00  . 

We  see  therefore,  by  §  2"36,  that  the  series  is  absolutely  convergent  when 
I  2:  j  <  1,  and  divergent  when  \z\  >  1. 
When  \z\  =  l,  we  have* 


nn-\-\ 


1  + 


1  + 


/>- 

1 

1- 

n 

/1\ 

+ 

0 

{^i) 

c-\      ^  /I 

+  0    -, 

n  \n^ 


_  a-\-b—  c  -1 

n 

Let  a,  b,  c  be  complex  numbers,  and  let  them  be  given  in  terms  of  their  real 
and  imaginary  parts  by  the  equations 

a  =  a'  +  ia!',     b  =  b'  +  ib",     c  =  c  -\-  ic" . 
Then  we  have 


1  ^ ^ +  0    - 

n  \n- 


= ^  1 1 + «:±  _*'_-  «i- ly + ("""^'--"y + 0  {^  (' 


a'  +  b'  —  c  -1      ^  /  1 
n  \n- 

By  §  2'37,  Corollary,  a  condition  for  absolute  convergence  is 

a'  +b'-c'  <0. 


*  The  symbol  0  (1/w^)  does  not  denote  the  same  function  of  n  throughout.     See  §  2-11. 


2-38-2-41]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  25 

Hence  when  \z\  =  l,  a  sufficient  condition*  for  the  absolute  convergence  of 
the  hypergeometric  series  is  that  the  real  part  of  a  +  b  —  c  shall  be  negative. 

2*4.     Effect  of  changing  the  order  of  the  terms  in  a  series. 

In  an  ordinary  sum  the  order  of  the  terms  is  of  no  importance,  for  it 
can  be  varied  without  affecting  the  result  of  the  addition.  In  an  infinite 
series,  however,  this  is  no  longer  the  casef,  as  will  appear  from  the  following 
example. 

Let  S=l  + 3-2  +  5  +  7-4 +9 +  11 -6  +  ..., 

J  cf        1  1        1        1        1        1 

and  ^  =  i_-  +  __-  +  -_^-  +  ..., 

and  let  ^n  and  Sn  denote  the  sums  of  their  first  n  terms.  These  infinite 
series  are  formed  of  the  same  terms,  but  the  order  of  the  terms  is  different, 
and  so  2^  and  8n  are  quite  distinct  functions  of  n. 

Let  cr^  =  J-  +  2  +  •  •  •  +  .;j '  so  that  Sn  =  cr^n  —  CTn  • 

mi-  V  1        1    .  Ill  1 

Then  X3n  =  i  +  3+...+4-ji-2-4--"-2^ 


2n 


—  ^iii        o  ""an        o  O'r, 


2 

Making  /i  -*  00  ,  we  see  that 


1 

—  (0"4>i  —  0"2n)  +  2  \^2n  —  <^n) 


2  =  o  +  n  o  ; 


2 

this  equation  shews  that  the  derangement  of  the  terms  of  S  has  altered 
its  sum. 

Example.     If  in  the  series 

the  order  of  the  terms  be  altered,  so  that  the  ratio  of  the  number  of  positive  terms  to  the 
number  of  negative  terms  in  the  first  n  terms  is  ultimately  a^,  shew  that  the  sum  of  the 
series  will  become  log  (2a).  (Manning.) 

2"41.     The  fundamental  property  of  absolutely  convergent  series. 
We  shall  shew  that  the  sum  of  an  absolutely  convergent  series  is  not 
affected  by  changing  the  order  in  which  the  terms  occur. 

Let  S  =  Ui  +  U2  +  U3  +  ... 

*  It  may  be   shewn  that   the  condition  is  also  necessary.     See  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series, 
pp.  202-204. 

t  We  say  that  the  series  S  f„  consists  of  the  terms  of  2  w,^  in  a  different  order  if  a  law 

is  given  by  which  corresponding  to  each  positive  integer  p  we  can  find  one  (and  only  one) 
integer  q  and  vice  versa,  and  Vq  is  taken  equal  to  «„. 


26  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  ll 

be  an  absolutely  convergent  series,  and  let  S'  be  a  series  formed  by  the  same 
terms  in  a  different  order. 

Let  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number,  and  let  n  be  chosen  so  that 

I  I      I  I  I  I      ^ 

I  ^»i+i  I  +  I  W'»+2  I  +  •  •  •  +  I  Ufi+p  I  <  2  ^ 

for  all  values  of  p. 

Suppose  that  in  order  to  obtain  the  first  n  terras  of  S  we  have  to  take 
m  terms  of  S' ;  then  if  A;  >  m, 

^k  =  ^n  +  terms  of  S  with  suffices  greater  than  n, 
so  that 

Sfc'  —  S  =  8n  —  S  +  terms  of  S  with  suffices  greater  than  n. 

Now  the  modulus  of  the  sum  of  any  number  of  terms  of  8  with  suffices 
greater  than  n  does  not  exceed  the  sum  of  their  moduli,  and  therefore  is  less 

than  2  f  • 

Therefore  \Sk' -  S  \<  \  Sn- S  \-\rle. 

But  \Sn-S\^   lim    {I  Un+i  I  +  I  Un+2  !+...  +  !  Un+p  | } 

1 

<2^. 

Therefore  given  e  we  can  find  m  such  that 

\S,'-S\<e 
when  k>m;  therefore  Sm^8,  which  is  the  required  result. 

If  a  series  of  real  terms  converges,  but  not  absolutely,  and  if  >S^^  be  the 
sum  of  the  first  p  positive  terms,  and  if  o-„  be  the  sum  of  the  first  n  negative 
terms,  then  Sp^  cc  ,  an-*—  oo  ;  and  lim  (Sp  +  an)  does  not  exist  unless  we 
are  given  some  relation  between  p  and  n.  It  has,  in  fact,  been  shewn  by 
Riemann  that  it  is  possible,  by  choosing  a  suitable  relation,  to  make 
lim  (Sp  + an)  equal  to  any  given  real  number*. 

2'5.     Double  seriesf. 

Let  Um^n  he  a  number  determinate  for  all  positive  integral  values  of  711 


and  n ; 

consider  the"  array 

Ul,u 

Wl,2, 

Wl,3,   •• 

U2,l, 

Ur.,2, 

U2,i,   ■■ 

^3,l> 

Uz,-2, 

U3,3,.. 

*  Gea.  Werke,  p.  221. 

t  A  complete  theory  of  double  series,  on  which  this  account  is  based,  is  given  by  Pringsheim, 
Miliichener  Sitztrngsberichte,  xxvii.  pp.  101-152.  See  further  memoirs  by  that  writer,  Math.  Ann. 
Liii.  pp.  289-321  and  by  London,  ibid.  pp.  322-370,  and  also  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series, 
which,  in  addition  to  an  account  of  Pringsheim's  theory,  contains  many  developments  of  the 
subject.  Other  important  theorems  are  given  by  Bromwich,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  i. 
pp.  176-201. 


2-5,  2'51]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  27 

Let  the  sum  of  the  terms  inside  the  rectangle,  formed  by  the  first 
m  rows  of  the  first  n  columns  of  this  array  of  terms,  be  denoted  by  <S,„^„. 

If  a  number  S  exists  such  that,  given  any  arbitrary  positive  number  e,  it 
is  possible  to  find  integers  m  and  n  such  that 

\S^,.-8\<e 

whenever  both  ix>m  and  v>n,  we  say*  that  the  double  series  of  which  the 
general  element  is  u^^  ^  converges  to  the  sum  S,  and  we  write 

lim       S^^  ^  =  S. 

jit  -»  JO,  J/-*  oo 

If  the  double  series,  of  which  the  general  element  is  \u^^^\,  is  convergent, 
we  say  that  the  given  double  series  is  absolutely  convergent. 

Since  Wm,^  =  ('S^m,i' ~ 'S^M.t— i)  — ('S^Mr*- *— 'S^M-i.^-iX  i*  is  easily  seen  that,  if 
the  double  series  is  convergent,  tfien 

lim       w^_  „  =  0. 

JUL  -^  QO  ,  V  —^  00 

Stolz'  necessary  and  sufficient  j-  condition  for  convergence.  A  condition  for 
convergence  which  is  obviously  necessary  (see  §  2-22)  is  that,  given  e,  we  can 
find  m  and  n  such  that  j  jS'^+p, ^+,  —  >Sf^  „  |  < e  whenever  ix>m  and  v>n  and 

p,  (T  may  take  any  of  the  values  0,  1,  2 The  cndition  is  also  sufficient ; 

for,  suppose  it  satisfied  ;  then,  when  /jb>ni  +  n,  \  »S^+p,;x+p  -  S^^^  \  <  e. 

Therefore,  by  §  2-22,  S^^^  has  a  limit  S;  and  then  making  p  and  a  tend  to 
infinity  in  such  a  way  that  fji.  +  p  =  v  +  a;  we  see  that  \  8  -  S^^^\-^e  when- 
ever fi>m  and  v>n;  that  is  to  say,  the  double  series  converges. 

Corollary.  An  absolutely  convergent  double  series  is  convergent.  For  if  the  double 
series  converges  absolutely  and  if  t-^n  be  the  sum  of  m  rows  of  n  columns  of  the  series  of 
moduli,  then,  given  f ,  we  can  find  /x  such  that,  when  p>m>  jx  and  q>  n>  /x,  tp^ ^  -  ^,„, n  < f • 
But  \Sp,q-  Sjn,n\^tp,q-tm,n  ^^d  so  \  Sp^q-  Sm,n\<f  when  JO  >  wi  > /Li,  J  >  ?i  > /x  ;  and  this 
is  the  condition  that  the  double  series  should  converge. 

2"51.     MethodsX  of  summing  double  ser'ies. 

00  00 

Let  us  suppose  that  %  u^^^,  converges  to  the  sum  8^.  Then  S  S^  is 
called  the  sum  by  rows  of  the  double  series ;  that  is  to  say,  the  sum  by  rows 

00/00\  00/CO\ 

is   S  (  S  u^^A.     Similarly,  the  sum  by  columns  is  defined  as   S  (  S  u^^^j. 
That  these  two  sums  are  not  necessarily  the  same  is  shewn  by  the  example 

S^^^=  ,  in  which  the  sum  by  rows  is  —  1,  the  sum  by  columns  is  +  1  ; 

and  S  does  not  exist. 

*  This  definition  is  practically  due  to  Cauchy  {Analyse  Algebraique,  p.  540). 
t  This  condition,  stated  by  Stolz  (Math.  Ann.  xxiv.),  appears  to  have  been  first  proved  by 
Pringsheim. 

X  These  methods  are  due  to  Cauchy. 


28  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

Pringsheim's  theorem  *:  If  S  exists  and  the  sums  hy  rows  and  columns 
exist,  then  each  of  these  sums  is  equal  to  S. 

For  since  S  exists,  then  we  can  find  m  such  that 

I  ^ft,  v~  S  \<  ^,   if  fJb>  m.,  V  >  m. 

And   therefore,  since  lim  8^^^  exists,  |(  lim  Sfj,^^)  —  8\^e\   that  is  to   say, 

S  Sp  —  S\i^€  when  yu,  > m,  and  so  (§  2'22)  the  sum  by  rows  converges  to  ^S'. 
In  like  manner  the  sum  by  columns  converges  to  8. 

2"52.     Absolutely  convergent  double  series. 

We  can  prove  the  analogue  of  §  2*41  for  double  series,  namely  that  if  the 
terms  of  an  absolutely  convergent  double  series  are  taken  in  any  order  as  a 
simple  series,  their  sum  tends  to  the  same  limit,  provided  that  every  term  occurs 
in  the  summation. 

Let  a^^t,  be  the  sum  of  the  rectangle  of  jx  rows  and  v  columns  of  the 
double  series  whose  general  element  is  !  u^^  „  \ ;  and  let  the  sum  of  this  double 
series  be  a.  Then  given  e  we  can  find  m  and  n  such  that  a  —  a^^^,  <  e 
whenever  both  /x  >  7n  and  v  >  n. 

Now  suppose  that  it  is  necessary  to  take  N  terms  of  the  deranged  series 
(in  the  order  in  which  the  terms  are  taken)  in  order  to  include  all  the  terms 
of  >S^3/_,.i  j^+i,  and  let  the  sum  of  these  terms  be  t]^. 

Then  tj^^r—  8m+i,3i+\  consists  of  a  sum  of  terms  of  the  type  Up^q  in  which 
p  >m,  q  >n  whenever  M  >  m  and  M>n;  and  therefore 

I  ^A'  —  ^^31+1,  M+1  I  <  O"  —  0"3/+l,  31+1  <  2^' 

Also,  *S^  —  8m+i, 3T+1  consists  of  terms  iip^ q  in  which  p  >  m,  q  >  n;  therefore 
I  8  —  8M+i,3i+-i  I  ^  cr  —  o-3[+i,3T+i  <  2  ^ '  therefore  \8—t2f\<e;  and,  corresponding 
to  any  given  number  e,  we  can  find  N;  and  therefore  tN-*'8. 

Example  1.     Prove  that  in  an  absolntelj  convergent  double  series,   2   2<,„,n  exists,  and 

n  =  l 

thence  that  the  sums  by  rows  and  columns  respectively  converge  to  S. 

[Let  the  sum  of  ^i  rows  of  v  columns  of  the  series  of  moduli  be  t^^v,  and  let  t  be  the  sum 
of  the  series  of  moduli. 

Then  2  |  ?ija, v\<t,  and  so  2  Uf^, „  converges  ;  let  its  sum  be  h^  ;  then 

v=l  v=\ 

\W  +  \b.2\  +  ...  +  \h^\^  lim  t^^v^t 

f-*-  00 

and  so  2  6^  converges   absolutely.     Therefore   the   sum   by  rows   of  the  double   series 

//.  =  ! 

exists,  similarly  the  sum  by  columns  exists  ;  and  the  required  result  then  follows  from 
Pringsheim's  theorem.] 

*  Loc.  cit.  p.  117. 


2-52-2'6]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  29 

Example  2.     Shew  from  first  principles  that  if  the  terms  of  an  absolutely  convergent 
double  series  be  arranged  in  the  order 

Wl.  1 +  («2.  l  +  Wl, 2) +  (W3.1  +  ^*2.2  +  «1.3)  +  (W4.1 +  •••+«!. 4) +  •.., 

this  series  converges  to  S. 

2"53.     Cauchys  theorem*  on  the  multiplication  of  absolutely  convergent 
series. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  if  two  series 

<S  =  Iti  +  Ms  +  ^3  +   .  .  . 

and  T  =  Vi  +  V.2  +  V3  +  . . . 

are  absolutely  convergent,  then  the  series 

P  =  UiVi  +  U2V1  +  U1V2  +  ..., 

formed  by  the  products  of  their  tei^ms,  written  in  any  order,  is  absolutely  con- 
vergent, and  has  for  sum  ST. 

Let  Sn  =  U^  +  «2  +  . . .  4-  Mn. 

Tn  =  Vi+  V.+  ...  +Vn. 

Then  ST  =  lim  Sn  Hm  T,,  =  lim  (S,,  Tn) 

by  example  2  of  §  2'2.     Now 

Sn  Tn  =  WiVi  +  U^Vj  +  . . .  +  UnVi 
+  U^V2  +  U2V2  +  ...  +  UnV2 
+ 

+  UiVn  +  IhVn  +  . . .  +  UnV^. 

But  this  double  series  is  absolutely  convergent;  for  if  these  terms  are 
replaced  by  their  moduli,  the  result  is  cTnTn,  where 

0'n=  |Wi|  +  1^2!+  •••  +  i^nl, 

and  o-„T„  is  known  to  have  a  limit.  Therefore,  by  §  2*52,  if  the  elements  of 
the  double  series,  of  which  the  general  term  is  u^Vn,  be  taken  in  any  order, 
their  sum  converges  to  ST. 

Example.     Shew  that  the  series  obtained  by  multiplying  the  two  series 

2        ^2        2^        3*  111 

1+2  +  25  +  2^  +  25+-'    ^+.-+.^  +  .-5  +  -' 

and  rearranging  according  to  powers  of  z,  converges  so  long  as  the  representative  point  of  z 
lies  in  the  ring-shaped  region  bounded  by  the  circles  |  2  1  =  1  and  |  z  |  =  2. 

2 '6.     Power- Series  f. 

A  series  of  the  type 

Oo  +  fli  2  +  a-.z-  +  a.jZ^  +  ..., 

in  which  the  coefficients  a^,  ai,  a.^,,  «y,  ...  are  independent  of  ^'j  is  called  a  series 
proceeding  according  to  ascending  powers  of  z,  or  briefly  a  poiuer-series. 

*  Analyse  Algebraique,  Note  vii. 

t  The  results  of  this  section  are  due  to  Caucby,  Analyse  Algebraique,  Chap.  ix. 


30  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

We  shall  now  shew  that  if  a  power-series  converges  for  any  value  z^  of  z, 
it  will  be  absolutely  convergent  for  all  values  of  z  whose  representative  points 
are  within  a  circle  which  passes  through  Zq  and  has  its  centre  at  the  origin. 

00 

For  if  z  be  such  a  point,  we  have  1 2^  j  <  |  ^'o  | .    Now  since  S  a„V*  converges, 

»=o 

anZo^  must  tend  to  zero  as  n  ^  cc ,  and  so  we  can  find  M  (independent  of  n) 
such  that 

I  anZo""  I  <  M. 


Thus  I  anZ''  i  <  31 


Therefore  every  term  in  the  series  2  \anZ^  \  is  less  than  the  corresponding 

71  =  0 

term  in  the  convergent  geometric  series 

2  m\-\    ■ 

the  series  is  therefore  convergent ;  and  so  the  power-series  is  absolutely 
convergent,  as  the  series  of  moduli  of  its  terms  is  a  convergent  series; 
the  result  stated  is  therefore  established. 

00 

Let  lim  |  a„  \~^'"^  =  r;  then,  from  §  2"35,  S  a,i^"^  converges  absolutely  when 

M=0 

00 

\z\<r;  if  I  ^  I  >  r,  a^^r"  does  not  tend  to  zero  and  so  S  a„^"  diverges  (§  2"3). 

«=o 

The    circle    \z\=r,  which  includes  all    the    values    of  z  for  which    the 
power-series 

«o  +  a^z  +  a.,z^  +  agZ^  +  ... 

converges,  is  called  the  aVcZe  of  convergence  of  the  series.  The  radius  of 
the  circle  is  called  the  radius  of  convergence. 

In  practice  there  is  usually  a  simpler  way  of  finding  r,  derived  from  d'Alembert's 
test  (§  2'36)  ;  r  is  lim  («„/«„ +  1)  if  this  limit  exists. 

A  power-series  may  converge  for  all  values  of  the  variable,  as  happens,  for 
instance,  in  the  case  of  the  series* 

z^       z^ 

z J 

3!      5!      ■"' 
which  represents  the  function  sin  z ;  in  this  case  the  series  converges  over  the 
whole  ^--plane. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  radius  of  convergence  of  a  power-series  may  be 
zero  ;  thus  in  the  case  of  the  series 

we  have  ,  ™'±i  -^  ^^^  1  2: 1 

9/     I         11' 

[     "m 

*  The  series  for  e*,  sin  z,  cos  z  and  the  fundamental  properties  of  these  functions  and  of 
log  z  will  be  assumed  throughout.  A  brief  account  of  the  theory  of  the  functions  is  given 
in  the  Appendix. 


2-61]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  31 

which,  for  all  values  of  n  after  some  fixed  value,  is  greater  than  unity  when 
z  has  any  value  different  from  zero.  The  series  converges  therefore  only  at 
the  point  z  =  0,  and  the  radius  of  its  circle  of  convergence  vanishes. 

A  power-series  may  or  may  not  converge  for  points  which  are  actually  on 
the  periphery  of  the  circle ;  thus  the  series 

z      z^      z^      z* 

iH 1 h  — I — ^-1-..., 

1*     2*     3»     4« 

whose  radius  of  convergence  is  unity,  converges  or  diverges  at  the  point  z=l 
according  as  s  is  greater  or  not  greater  than  unity,  as  was  seen  in  §  2*33. 

Corollary.     If  («„)  be  a  sequence  of  positive  terms  such  that  Hqi  (a,n-i/«„)  exists,  this 
limit  is  equal  to  lim  a^}''^. 

2"61.     Convergence  of  series  derived  from  a  power-series. 

Let  ao  +  aiZ  +  a^z^  +  asZ^  +  QiZ*  +  ,., 

be  a  power-series,  and  consider  the  series 

tti  -I-  2a2Z  +  SttsZ^  +  4taiZ^  +  ..., 

which  is  obtained  by  differentiating  the  power-series  term  by  term.  We 
shall  now  shew  that  the  derived  series  has  the  same  circle  of  convergence  as  the 
original  series. 

For  let  z  he  a  point  within  the  circle  of  convergence  of  the  power-series ; 
and  choose  a  positive  number  ?'i ,  intermediate  in  value  between  |  z  j  and  r  the 

radius  of  convergence.    Then,  since  the  series  ^  ofn^i"  converges  absolutely,  its 

re  =  0 

terms  must  tend  to  zero  as  n  -♦  oc ;  and  it  must  therefore  be  possible  to  find  a 
positive  number  M,  independent  of  n,  such  that  |  a„  |  <  Mr-^~''^  for  all  values 
of  w. 

Then  the  terms  of  the  series  2  n  j  «„  |  \z\'^~'^  are   less   than   the  corre- 

M  =  l 

spending  terms  of  the  series 

M  ^   n  |^!"-i 


ji— 1 


n  «=i     r. 

But  this  series  converges,  by  §  2"36,  since  \z\<r-^.     Therefore,  by  §  2-34,  the 
series 

•  •  00 

n  =  \ 

oc 

converges ;  that  is,  the  series  S  nanz''^~^  converges  absolutely  for  all  points  z 

situated  within  the  circle  of  convergence  of  the  original  series  2  a„^".     When 

\  z\>  r,  anZ'^  does  not  tend  to  zero,  and  a  fortiori  nanZ''^  does  not  tend  to 
zero ;  and  so  the  two  series  have  the  same  circle  of  converoence. 


32  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

Similarly  it  can  be  shewn  that  the  series  X   — — - ,  which  is  obtained  bv 

»j=o  w  +  1  -^ 

integrating  the  original  power-series  term  by  term,  has  the  same  circle  of 
convergence  as    S  <x„2^**. 

2  "7.     Infinite  Products. 

We   proceed   now   to  the  consideration  of  a  class  of  limits,  known  as 
infinite  products. 

Let  1  +  «!,  1  +  a2,  l+tta,  ...  be  a  sequence  such  that  none  of  its  members 
vanish.     If,  as  ?i  -*  oo  ,  the  product 

(1  +  aO (1  +  ^2) (1  +  as)  •••  (1  +  aj 
(which  we  may  denote  by  n„)  tends  to  a  definite  limit  other  than  zero,  this 
limit  is  called  the  value  of  the  infinite  product 

n,  =  (1  +  a,) (1  +  a,) (l+tts)  ..., 

and  the  product  is  said  to  be  convergent.    It  is  almost  obvious  that  a  necessary 
condition  for  convergence  is  that  lim  a„  =  0,  since  lim  Hn-i  —  li^^  ^n  =1=  ^• 

The  limit  of  the  product  is  written   11  (1  +  o.^). 

in  Cm  ^ 

Now  n  (1  +  a^)  =  exp  ]   X  log  (1  +  an)\, 

and*  exp  {  lim  Um]  =  bni    {exp  Um] 

if  the  former   limit  exists ;   hence  a  sufficient  condition  that  the  product 

00 
should  converge  is  that  S  log  (1  +  «»)  should  converge  when  the  logarithms 

have  their  principal  values.     If  this  series  of  logarithms  converges  absolutely, 
the  convergence  of  the  product  is  said  to  be  absolute. 

The  condition  for  absolute  convergence  is  given  by  the  following  theorem  : 
in  order  that  the  infinite  product 

(1  +ai)(l  +  a2)(l  +  a3)... 

may  he  absolutely  convergent,  it  is  necessary  and  sufficient  that  the  series 

tti  +  a2  +  0.3  +  . .  . 

should  he  absolutely  convergent. 

For,  by  definition,  11  is  absolutely  convergent  or  not  according  as  the 
series 

log(l+ai)  +  log(l  +  fto)  +  log  (1  +  tta)  +  ... 

is  absolutely  convergent  or  not. 

*  See  the  Appendix. 


27,  271]  THE  THEORY  OF  CONVERGENCE  33 

Now,  since  lim  a„  =  0,  we  can  find  m  such  that  when  n  >  m,  |  a„  |  <  ^  ;  and 
then 

dn  O/fi  O'n 


I  a„-^  log(l  +  a„)  -  1  I  =  I  -  ^  +  ^  -  ^  +  ... 

^  22       2»  2 


And  thence,  when  n>m,  ^  ^  —^ —  ^  o  '  therefore,  by  the  comparison 

theorem,  the  absolute  convergence  of  S  log  (1  +  «„)  entails  that  of  2a„  and 
conversely,  provided  that  a„  =f  —  1  for  any  value  of  n. 
This  establishes  the  result*. 

If,  in  a  product,  a  finite  number  of  factors  vanish,  and  if,  when  these  are  suppressed, 
the  resulting  product  converges,  the  original  product  is  said  to  converge  to  zero.     But  such 

CO 

a  product  as  n  (1  -  n~^)  is  said  to  diverge  to  zero. 

Corollary.  Since,  if  Sn-»~l,  exp  {Sn)-*-exi)  I,  it  follows  from  §  2'41  that  the  factors 
of  an  absolutely  convergent  product  can  be  deranged  without  afifiecting  the  value  of  the 
product. 

00  00 

Example  1.  Shew  that  if  n  (1  +a„)  converges,  so  does  2  log  (1  +«„))  if  the  logarithms 
have  their  principal  values. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  the  infinite  product 

sin  z    sin  \z    sin  ^z    sin  \z 
z     '     iz     '      ^z     '     ^z 
is  absolutely  convergent  for  all  values  of  z. 

For  (sin  ^ )  /  (  ^ )  can  be  written  in  the  form  1  — ^ ,  where  |  X„  |  <  ^  and  k  is  inde- 
pendent of  n  ;   and  the  series  2   -^  is   absolutely  convergent,  as  is  seen  on  comparing 

n=l  'i 

it  with  2    -^.     The  infinite  product  is  therefore  absolutely  convergent. 

2"71.     Some  examples  of  infinite  products. 
Consider  the  infinite  product 

which,  as  will  be  proved  later  (§  7'5),  represents  the  function  z~'^  sin  z. 

In  order  to  find  whether  it  is  absolutely  convergent,  we  must  consider  the 

series  X  — r-„,  or— „  S    -;   this  series  is  absolutely  convergent,  and  so  the 

product  is  absolutely  convergent  for  all  values  of  z. 
Now  let  the  product  be  written  in  the  form 

*  A  discussion  of  the  convergence  of  infinite  products,  in  which  the  results  are  obtained 
without  making  use  of  the  logarithmic  function,  is  given  by  Pringsheim,  Math.  Aim.  xxxiii. 
pp.  119-154,  and  also  by  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series,  Chap.  vi. 

W.    M.    A.  3 


34  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

The  absolute  convergence  of  this  product  depends  on  that  of  the  series 


z       z       z         z 

IT      TT      27r      27r   "* 


But  this  series  is  only  conditionally  convergent,  since  its  series  of  moduli 


\z\      \z\      \z\      \z\ 
— '  +  —  +  ^-^  +  k-  + 


is  divergent.  In  this  form  therefore  the  infinite  product  is  not  absolutely 
convergent,  and  so,  if  the  order  of  the  factors  [  1  +  —  j  is  deranged,  there  is 
a  risk  of  altering  the  value  of  the  product. 

Lastly,  let  the  same  product  be  written  in  the  form 

in  which  each  of  the  expressions 

I  1  +  —  )  e^rmt 

is  counted  as  a  single  factor  of  the  infinite  product.  The  absolute  convergence 
of  this  product  depends  on  that  of  the  series  of  which  the  (2m  —  l)th  and 
(2m)th  terms  are 

\        mTTj 
But  it  is  easy  to  verify  that 

\        mirj  \m^J 

and  so  the  absolute  convergence  of  the  series  in  question  follows  by  comparison 
with  the  series 

-       1       1       1       1       1       1 

l+l  +  2^.  +  25+32  +  p  +  p+45+.... 

The    infinite    product    in    this    last    form    is    therefore    again    absolutely 

±  — 
convergent,    the    adjunction  of  the   factors    e  "''  having  changed  the  con- 
vergence from  conditional  to  absolute.     This  result  is  a  particular  case  of 
the  first  part  of  the  factor  theorem  of  Weierstrass  (§  7"6). 

Example  1.     Prove  that  IT  ]( 1 ]  e»4  is  absolutely  convergent  for  all  values  of 

2,  if  c  is  a  constant  other  than  a  negative  integer. 

For  the  infinite  product  converges  absolutely  with  the  series 


2   ni~--~]e^-l 
n=\\\       c  +  n 


2-71]  THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  35 

Now  the  general  term  of  this  series  is 

But    2    -^converges,  and  so,  by  §2-34,  2    \{l ■)e''-li  converges  absolutely, 

n=l'«"  n=l     l\         C  +  7lJ  ) 

and  therefore  the  product  converges  absolutely. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  n   -|l-(l — j      2~"^  converges  for  all  points  z  situated 
outside  a  circle  whose  centre  is  the  origin  and  radius  unity. 

For  the  infinite  product  is  absolutely  convergent  provided  that  the  series 

2      1--        2-" 
n=2  \       nj 

is  absolutely  convergent.     But  lim    (1  —  j      =e,  so  the  limit  of  the  ratio  of  the  (?i+l)th 
term  of  the  series  to  the  Kth  term  is  -  ;  there  is  therefore  absolute  convergence  when 


Example  3.     Shew  that 


<  1,  i.e.  when  U  |  >  1. 
1.2.3...(7n-l) 


{z  +  \){z+2)...{z  +  m-l) 
tends  to  a  finite  limit  as  m  -*-  oc ,  unless  2  is  a  negative  integer. 

For  the  expression  can  be  written  as  a  product  of  which  the  nth  factor  is 

This  product  is  therefore  absolutely  convergent,  provided  the  series 

is  absolutely  convergent ;  and  a  comparison  with  the  convergent  series  2    -^  shews  that 

this  is  the  case.     When  2  is  a  negative  integer  the  expression  does  not  exist  because  one  of 
the  factors  in  the  denominator  vanishes. 


Example  4.     Prove  that 

.6- 


1-^-111+^ 


1-; 


1  +  ; 


--log2     . 
:  e    T         SHI  2. 


For  the  given  product 


lim  2(1- 


i-^Ui+^ 


1- 


:  lim 


V  2  •.^     4    2  2A:-1    -ilckl 


1- 


2ki 


1  + 


X2      1- 


1- 


2h 


(i'lkn  ,      1  + 


,>     Icn 


lime    -'^    2^3    "^t-i    2k)ji_^Vlfi+L\e    ^  ('i  _  AV,2.  ^ +_l')  ^"2^  ... , 


3—2 


36  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  II 

since  the  product  whose  factors  are 


\        rr  j 


is  absolutely  convergent,  and  so  the  order  of  its  factors  can  be  altered. 

Since  log2  =  l-|  +  ^-i  +  ^- •••> 

this  shews  that  the  given  product  is  equal  to 

--log 2   . 
e    T         sin  z. 

2*8.     Infinite  Determinants. 

Infinite  series  and  infinite  products  are  not  by  any  means  the  only 
known  cases  of  limiting  processes  which  can  lead  to  intelligible  results.  The 
researches  of  G.  W.  Hill  in  the  Lunar  Theory*  brought  into  notice  the 
possibilities  of  infinite  determinants. 

The  actual  investigation  of  the  convergence  is  due  not  to  Hill  but  to  Poincar^  Bull,  de 
la  Soc.  Math,  de  France^  xiv.  (1886),  p.  87.  We  shall  follow  the  exposition  given  by 
H.  von  Koch,  Acta  Math.  xvi.  (1892),  p.  217. 

Let  Aik  be  defined  for  all  integer  values  (positive  and  negative)  of  i,  k, 
and  denote  by 

■L-'m^^  \_-^ik\i,k  =  —m,...-\-m 

the  determinant  formed  of  the  numbers  Ai]c{i,  k=  —  m,  ...+wi);  then  if, 
as  VI  ^  oc  ,  the  expression  D^  tends  to  a  determinate  limit  D,  we  shall  say 
that  the  infinite  determinant 

L-^  ifcJi,A;  =  — 00  — f-x 

is  convergent  and  has  the  value  D.  If  the  limit  D  does  not  exist,  the  deter- 
minant in  question  will  be  said  to  be  divergent. 

The  elements  An,  (where  i  takes  all  values),  are  said  to  form  the  principal 
diagonal  of  the  determinant  D\  the  elements  A^k,  (where  i  is  fixed  and  k 
takes  all  values),  are  said  to  form  the  row  i;  and  the  elements  Ai]c,  (where  k 
is  fixed  and  i  takes  all  values),  are  said  to  form  the  column  k.  Any  element 
Aijc  is  called  a  diagonal  or  a  non-diagonal  element,  according  as  i  =  k  ov  i^k. 
The  element  A^^^  is  called  the  origin  of  the  determinant. 

2'81.     Convergence  of  an  infinite  determinant. 

Wo  shall  now  shew  that  an  infinite  determinant  converges,  provided  the  product  of  the 
diagonal  elements  converges  absolutely,  and  the  sum  of  the  non-diagonal  elements  converges 
absolutely. 

For  let  the  diagonal  elements  of  an  infinite  determinant  D  be  denoted  by  l+aji, 
and  let  the  non-diagonal  elements  be  denoted  by  aj^,  (^=t=^),  so  that  the  determinant  is 

...  l  +  <x_i-i  a-io  a~n-- 

«()  _  1  1  -j-  Cloo  <^01 

«!_!  aio        l  +  ai,      ., 

Repriuted  in  Acta  Mathematica,  viii.  pp.   1-3G  (1886). 


2-8-2-82]  THE   THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  _  87 

Then  since  the  series 


is  convergent,  the  product 

is  convergent. 

Now  form  the  products 


2       i  a,-fc  j 


'=    n    (l+    2     \aa\) 


P,„=    n       1+    2     a,fc 

i=~in  \         k=—m 


P,n=     0         1+2 

i=  —  m  \         k=—m 


hk !  j ; 


then  if,  in  the  expansion  of  /*,„,  certain  terms  are  rei^laced  by  zero  and  certain  other 
terms  have  their  signs  changed,  we  shall  obtain  D^  ;  thus,  to  each  term  in  the  expansion 
of  2>„  there  corresponds,  in  the  expansion  of  /*,„,  a  term  of  equal  or  greater  modulus. 
Now  D,n  +  p  —  J)m  represents  the  sum  of  those  terms  in  the  determinant  i),„  +  p  which  vanish 
when  the  numbers  an^li,  k=  ±  (m+1) ...  +  {m-^p)}  are  replaced  by  zero  ;  and  to  each  of 
these  terms  there  corresponds  a  term  of  equal  or  greater  modulus  in  Pm  +  p-P-m- 

Hence  I  D^^^  +  p  —  D^  \  ^  P^  +  p~ P.^. 

Therefore,  since  P,„  tends  to  a  limit  as  to  -*•  x ,  so  also  D,„  tends  to  a  limit.  This 
establishes  the  proposition. 

2'82,     The  rearrangement  Theorem  for  convergent  infinite  determinants. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  a  determinant,  of  the  convergent  form  already  considered, 
remains  convergent  when  the  elements  of  any  row  are  replaced  by  any  set  of  ele^nents  whose 
'moduli  are  all  less  than  some  fixed  positive  number. 

Replace,  for  example,  the  elements 

■•• -^0,  -wi)  •••      ^0  ••• -4o,m  ••• 
of  the  row  through  the  origin  by  the  elements 

...  /x_,„,  ...     ^0  •••  Mm  ••• 
which  satisfy  the  inequality 

!  Mr  I  <  M> 

where  /x  is  a  positive  number  ;   and  let  the  new  values  of  i),„  and  D  be  denoted  by 

Z)„/  and  ly.     Moreover,  denote  by  /*,„'  and  P"  the  products  obtained  by  suppressing  in 

/*„i  and  P  the  ftxctor  corresponding  to  the  index  zero  ;  we  see  that  no  terms  of  /)„/  can 

have  a  greater  modulus  than  the  corresponding  term  in   the  expansion  of  /xP,^' ;    and 

consequently,  reasoning  as  in  the  last  article,  we  have 

which  is  sufficient  to  establish  the  result  stated. 

Example.  Shew  that  the  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for  the  absolute  conver- 
gence of  the  infinite  determinant 

lim       1       ai      0      0    ...   0 


^1        1           02 

0       /32      1 

0     ... 
ag   ... 

0 
0 

0      ...      0      13,, 

1 

is  that  the  series 

shall  be  absolutely  convergent.  (von  Koch.) 


38 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  II 


REFERENCES. 

Convergent  series. 

A.  Pringsheim,  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  xxxv. 

T.  J.  I'a.  Bromwich,  Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  Chs.  ii.  lii.  iv. 

Conditionally  convergent  series. 

G.  F.  B.  RiEMANN,  Ges.  Math.    Werke,  pp.  221-225. 
A.  Pringsheim,  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  xxii. 

Double  series. 

A.  Pringsheim,  Milnchener  Sitzungsherichte,  Bd.  xxvii. 

„  „  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  Liii. 

G.  H.  Hardy,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc,  ser.  2,  vol.  i. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Evaluate  lim  (e~"''#),  liin  («~"  logw)  when  a>0,  6>0. 

2.  Investigate  the  convergence  of 

3.  Investigate  the  convergence  of 

ri.3,..2w-l     4?i  +  3]2 


°°    fl-3...2?z-l     4?i  +  31 2 
.^i{2T4...2n     '  2n  +  2)    ' 


(Trinity,  1904.) 


(Peterhouse,  1906.) 


,  2n       2n 

4.  Find  the  range  of  values  of  z  for  which  the  series 

2  sin2  0-4  sin^^  +  Ssin^z-... +  (-)»  +  !  2»sin2"a+... 
is  convergent. 

5.  Shew  that  the  series 

1  _  _1_      J[ 1_ 

z      z  +  l"^  z  +  2      z  +  3'^'" 

is  conditionally  convergent,  except  for  certain  exceptional  values  of  z  ;  hut  that  the  series 


1         1  1 

+  — T  +  --  + 


1 


1 


+ 


+  ..., 


2      2  +  1      ■■"     z+p-l      z+p      z+p  +  l      '"     z-\-2p  +  q-l      z  +  2p-\-q 
in  which  {p  +  q)  negative  terms  always  follow  jo  positive  terms,  is  divergent.        (Simon.) 

6.     Shew  that 


i-*-i+fi-J-Hi-.-=*iog2. 


7.  Shew  that  the  series 

is  convergent,  although 

8.  Shew  that  the  series 
is  convergent  although 


1111 

1*      2^      3*      4^ 


M2n  +  l/M2n-*=0- 

a  +  l3^  +  a^  +  ^*+... 


(Trinity,  1908.) 

(l<«0) 

(Ceskro.) 

(0<a</3<l) 

(Cesaro.) 


THE  THEORY   OF   CONVERGENCE  39 

9.  Shew  that  the  series 

"    TOg'*-'{(l+it-^)"-l} 
„!x(2»-l){0»-(l +«-')»} 
converges  absolutely  for  all  values  of  z,  except  the  values 

\       m) 
(a  =  0,  1;   >{;=0,  1,  ...  »?-l;  m  =  l,  2,  3, ...). 

10.  Shew  that,  when  «>1, 

nfl  »•       «  -  1  ^  ^ti !_%»  ^  «  -  1   1(%  +  1 )«-!       «<•-»/ J  ' 

^  and  shew  that  the  series  on  the  right  converges  when  0  <  s  <  1. 

(de  la  Valine  Poussin.) 

11.  In  the  series  whose  general  term  is 

M„  =  ^"■"^ri''(''+^>,  (0<?<1<^) 

where  v  denotes  the  number  of  digits  in  the  expression  of  n  in  the  ordinary  decimal  scale 

of  notation,  shew  that 

J 
lim    u^n=q_^ 

and  that  the  series  is  convergent,  although  lim  m„  +  i/m„  =  xi  . 

12.  Shew  that  the  series 


where 


?n  =  r"*""%  (0<J<1) 

is  convergent,  although  the  ratio  of  the  (?i+l)th  term  to  the  wth  is  greater  than  unity 
when  n  is  not  a  triangular  number.  (Cesaro.) 

13.     Shew  that  the  series 

«>       Jlrnrix 
2      ^ , 


where  w  is  real,  and  where  {w+7iy  is  understood  to  mean  e^^°s(w+n)^  the  logarithm  being 
taken  in  its  arithmetic  sense,  is  convergent  for  all  values  of  s,  when  the  imaginary  part  of 
X  is  positive,  and  is  convergent  for  values  of  s  whose  real  part  is  positive,  when  x  is  real. 

14.     If  Un>0,  shew  that  if  2tt^  converges,  then  lim  (nM„)=0,  and  that,  if  in  addition 


Un  >  Un  + 1,  then  lim  (nUn)  —  0. 
15.     If 

shew  that 


m  —  n  (w  +  ?^-  1)  ! 


"m,  n       gm  +  n 


2m  +  n        mini 


2(2  a^„ 
»=o  \»=o 


—  1,         2     12   Clm,n 
ji=0  \m  =  0 


{m,  n>0) 


(Trinity,  1904.) 


16.     By  converting  the  series 

89^       16£^       2V   , 
^l-9^1+?2      1-93         ' 

(in  which  |  g- 1  <  1),  into  a  double  series,  shew  that  it  is  equal  to 


1  + 


(1-^)2      {l+q^f      (l-j3): 


(Jacobi.) 


40 


17.     Assuming  that 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 
sin3  =  3  n  ( 1  - 


[chap.  II 


^2^2  ]  ' 


shew  that  if  m  -^  oo  and  %  -*-  tx)  in  such  a  way  that  Hm  {mln)=k,  where  k  is  finite,  then 

lim  U'    U+'-\  =  k^l-^^}^, 
r=-n  V       rtrj  z 

the  dash  indicating  that  the  factor  for  which  r  =  0  is  omitted.  (Math.  Trip.,  1904.) 

18.     If  ■WQ  =  wi  =  tt2=0,  and  if,  when  ?i>  1, 

1  111 

00  00  00 

then  n  (H-M„)  converges,  though  2  m„  and  2  ?«„2  ^re  divergent. 

«=0  n=:0  7t=0 


19.     Prove  that 


(Math.  Trip.,  1906.) 
TT  \(^     ^^"*        (^^^  ^-w'^'AI 
where  k  is  any  positive  integer,  converges  absohitely  for  all  values  of  z. 

00  00 

20.  If  2  a,j  be  a  conditionally  convergent  series  of  real  terms,  then  11  (l+a„)  con- 

«=i  jt=i 

verges  (but  not  absolutely)  or  diverges  to  zero  according  as  2  a^  converges  or  diverges. 

(Cauchy.) 

21.  Let  2  ^„  be  an  absolutely  convergent  series.     Shew  that  the  infinite  determinant 


A(c)  = 


(c- 4)2-^0 


4-'-^o  \        4''i-^o  42-^0  42-^0  42- 

-^1       (c-2)2-^o     -e^         -fi.> 


•••       22-^,  22-^  22-^0  22-^0  22-^0      •• 

-^3  -62  -Ql  (C  + 2)2-^0  -^1 

■■■      22-^0  22-^;  22-^0      '22-^0,  22-^0      ■■■ 


-^i^c  +  4)2-^o 


42-^0 


42-^0      42-^0      42-^0      42-^0 


converges  ;  and  shew  that  the  equation 


is  equivalent  to  the  equation 


A(c)  =  0 
sin2  -^770  =  A  (0)  sin2  \n6()K 


(Hill.) 


CHAP.TER  III 

CONTINUOUS   FUNCTIONS  AND   UNIFORM  CONVERGENCE 

3'1.     The  dependence  of  one  complex  number  on  another. 

The  problems  with  which  Analysis  is  mainly  occupied  relate  to  the 
dependence  of  one  complex  number  on  another.  If  z  and  f  are  two  complex 
numbers,  so  connected  that,  if  z  is  given  any  one  of  a  certain  set  of  values, 
corresponding  values  of  ^  can  be  determined,  e.g.  if  f  is  the  square  of  z,  or  if 
^=1  when  z  is  real  and  ^=0  for  all  other  values  of  z,  then  ^  is  said  to  be  a 
function  of  z. 

This  dependence  must  not  be  confused  with  the  most  important  case  of 
it,  which  will  be  explained  later  under  the  title  oi  analytic  functionality . 

If  ^  is  a  real  function  of  a  real  variable  z,  then  the  relation  between  f  and  z,  which 
may  be  written 

can  be  visualised  by  a  curve  in  a  plane,  namely  the  locus  of  a  point  whose  coordinates 
referred  to  rectangular  axes  in  the  plane  are  {z,  ().  No  such  simple  and  convenient 
geometrical  method  can  be  found  for  visualising  an  equation 

considered  as  defining  the  dependence  of  one  complex  number  ^=^-\-ir)  on  another 
complex  number  z=.v  +  i}/.  A  representation  strictly  analogous  to  the  one  already  given 
for  real  variables  would  require  four-dimensional  si)ace,  since  the  number  of  variables 
I,  77,  X,  y  is  now  four. 

One  suggestion  (made  by  Lie  and  Weierstrass)  is  to  use  a  doubly-manifold  system  of 
lines  in  the  quadruply-manifold  totality  of  lines  in  three-dimensional  space. 

Another  suggestion  is  to  represent  ^  and  x)  separately  by  means  of  surfaces 

^  =  l(-^,  y),     '?  =  '?(•^^  .'/)• 
A  third  siiggestion,  due  to  HefFter*    is  to  write 

then  draw  the  surface  r  =  r{x,  y)— which  may  be  called  the  modular-surface  of  the 
function — and  on  it  to  express  the  values  of  6  by  surface-markings.  It  might  be 
possible  to  modify  this  suggestion  in  various  ways  by  representing  6  by  curves  drawn 
on  the  surface  r  =  r  {x\  y). 

*  Zeitschriftfiir  Math.  u.  Phys.  xliv.  (1899),  p.  235. 


42  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

3'2.     Continuity  of  functions  of  real  variables. 

The  reader  will  have  a  general  idea  (derived  from  the  graphical  represen- 
tation of  functions  of  a  real  variable)  as  to  what  is  meant  by  continuity. 
We  now  have  to  give  a  precise  definition  which  shall  embody  this  vague 
idea. 

Let  f{x)  be  a  function  of  x  defined  when  a  ^x  ^h. 

Let  ooi  be  such  that  a^x^^^h.  If  there  exists  a  number  I  such  that, 
corresponding  to  an  arbitrary  positive  number  e,  we  can  find  a  positive 
number  t]  such  that 

\f{x)-l\<e, 

whenever  \x  —  x■^\<rj,  x^^x^,  and  a^x ^b,  then  I  is  called  the  limit  of  f{x) 
as  X  ^Xi. 

It  may  happen  that  we  can  find  a  number  l^  (even  when  I  does  not  exist) 
such  that  \f(x)  —  Z+  j  <  e  when  x^Kx  <x^+r).  We  call  1+  the  limit  of  f{x) 
when  X  approaches  x^  from  the  right  and  denote  it  by  f(xy  +  0)  ;  in  a  similar 
manner  we  define  f(xi  —  0)  if  it  exists^ 

If  f(xi+  0),  f(xi),  f(xi  —  0)  all  exist  and  are  equal,  we  say  that  f{x)  is 
continuous  at  x^^ ;  so  that  ii  f{x)  is  continuous  at  x-i,  then,  given  e,  we  can  find 
7]  such  that 

\f(x)  -f{x,)  i  <  e, 

whenever  \x  —  Xi\<7]  and  a^x^b. 

If  ^4.  and  L  exist  but  are  unequal,  f(x)  is  said  to  have  an  ordinary 
discontinuity*  at  x^;  and  if  l+  =  l^^f(x^),f{x)  is  said  to  have  a  removable 
discontinuity  at  Xj. 

If  f(x)  is  a  complex  function  of  a  real  variable,  and  if  f(x)  =  g  {x)  +  i  h  {x) 
where  g  (x)  and  h{x)  are  real,  the  continuity  of  f(x)  at  x^  implies  the  con- 
tinuity of  g  (x)  and  of  h  (x).  For  when  \f(x)  —f{x^)  \  <  e,  then  \g{x)  —g{xi)  \  <  e 
and  \h(x)  —  h  (xi)  \<  e;  and  the  result  stated  is  obvious. 

Example.  From  §  2-2  examples  1  and  2  deduce  that  if  f{.v)  and  (f)  (x)  are  con- 
timious  at  .Vi,  so  are / (^) ± </> (.r),  f{x)x4>{x)  and,  if  (/)(.ri)4=0,  f{x)l^{x). 

The  popular  idea  of  continuity,  so  far  as  it  relates  to  a  real  variable /(^)  depending 
on  another  real  variable  x,  is  somewhat  different  from  that  just  considered,  and  may 
perhaps  best  be  expressed  by  the  statement  "The  function /(.*■)  is  said  to  depend  con- 
tinuously on  X  if,  as  x  passes  through  the  series  of  all  values  intermediate  between  any 
two  adjacent  values  x^  and  X2,f{x)  passes  through  the  series  of  all  values  intermediate 
between  the  corresponding  values  /{xj)  and  /(*'2)." 

The  question  thus  arises,  how  far  this  popular  definition  is  equivalent  to  the  precise 
definition  given  above. 

Cauchy  shewed  that  if  a  real  function  /  (.r),  of  a  real  variable  x,  satisfies  the  precise 
definition,  then  it  also  satisfies  what  we  have  called  the  popular  definition  ;  this  result 

*  If  a  function  is  said  to  have  ordinary  discontinuities  at  certain  points  of  an  interval  it 
is  implied  that  it  is  continuous  at  all  other  points  of  the  interval. 


3-2,  3-21]       CONTINUOUS   FUNCTIONS   AND   UNIFORM   CONVERGENCE  43 

will  be  proved  in  §  3-63.     But  the  converse  is  not  true,  as  was  shewn  by  Darboux.     This 
fact  may  be  illustrated  by  the  following  example*. 

Between  x=  —  1  and  x=  +  1  (except  at  ^=0),  let / (a?)  =  sin  —  ;  and  let/(0)«»0. 

It  can  then  be  proved  that  f(x)  depends  continuously  on  x  near  x  =  0,  in  the  sense  of 
the  popular  definition,  but  is  not  continuous  at  ^s=0  in  the  sense  of  the  precise  definition. 

Example.  If  f{x)  be  defined  and  be  monotonic  in  the  range  (a,  b),  the  limits/ (a; ±0) 
exist  at  all  points  in  the  interior  of  the  range. 

[1{  f(x)  be  an  increasing  function,  a  section  of  rational  numbers  can  be  found  such 
that,  if  a,  .4  be  any  members  of  its  Z-class  and  its  iS-class,  a<f{x+k)  for  every  positive 
value  of  h  and  A  "^/(x  +  h)  for  some  positive  value  of  h.  The  number  defined  by  this 
section  is/(^  +  0).] 

3'21.     Simple  curves.     Gontinua. 

Let  X  and  y  be  two  real  functions  of  a  real  variable  t  which  are  continuous 
for  every  value  of  t  such  that  a^t^b.  We  denote  the  dependence  of  x  and  y 
on  t  by  writing 

x  =  x  (t),     y  =  y  it).  (a^t^b) 

The  functions  x  (t),  y  (t)  are  supposed  to  be  such  that  they  do  not  assume  the 
same  pair  of  values  for  any  two  different  values  of  t  in  the  range  a<  t<  b. 

Then  the  set  of  points  with  coordinates  (x,  y)  corresponding  to  these  values 
of  t  is  called  a  simple  curve.     If 

x(a)  =  x  (b),     y(a)==y  (b), 
the  simple  curve  is  said  to  be  closed. 

Example.     The  circle  x^  +  i/^=l  is  a  simple  closed  curve  ;  for  we  may  write  t 

A'=cos^,    7/  =  smt.  {0^t^2Tr) 

A  two-dimensional  continuum  is  a  set  of  points  in  a  plane  possessing  the 
following  two  properties : 

(i)  If  (x,  y)  be  the  Cartesian  coordinates  of  any  point  of  it,  a  positive 
number  3  (depending  on  x  and  y)  can  be  found  such  that  every  point  whose 
distance  from  {x,  y)  is  less  than  S  belongs  to  the  set. 

(ii)  Any  two  points  of  the  set  can  be  joined  by  a  simple  curve  consisting 
entirely  of  points  of  the  set. 

Example.  The  ^joints  for  which  x'^+y'^Kl  form  a  continuum.  For  if  P  be  any 
point  inside  the  unit  circle  such  that  OP=r<l,  we  may  take  8  =  1 -r;  and  any  two 
points  inside  the  circle  may  be  joined  by  a  straight  line  lying  wholly  inside  the  circle. 

The  following  two  theorems^  will  be  assumed  in  this  work ;  simple  cases 
of  them  appear  obvious  from  geometrical  intuitions  and,  generally,  theorems 
of  a  similar  nature  will  be  taken  for  granted,  as  formal  proofs  are  usually 
extremely  long  and  difficult. 

*  Due  to  Mansion,  Mathens,  ix.  (1899). 

t  It  may  be  proved  that  the  sine  and  cosine  are  continuous  functions.     See  the  Appendix. 
X  Formal  proofs  will  be  found  in   Watson's    Complex   Integration   and   Caiiclujs  Theorem. 
(Cambridge  Math.  Tracts,  No.  15.) 


44  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

(I)  A  simple  closed  curve  divides  the  plane  into  two  continua  (the 
'  interior '  and  the  '  exterior '). 

(II)  If  P  be  a  point  on  the  curve  and  Q  be  a  point  not  on  the  curve, 
the  angle  between  QP  and  Ox  increases  by  +  27r  or  by  zero,  as  P  describes 
the  curve,  according  as  Q  is  an  interior  point  or  an  exterior  point.  If  the 
increase  is  +  27r,  P  is  said  to  describe  the  curve  '  counterclockwise.' 

A  continuum  formed  by  the  interior  of  a  simple  curve  is  sometimes  called 
an  open  two-dimensional  region,  or  briefly  an  open  region,  and  the  curve  is 
called  its  boundary ;  such  a  continuum  with  its  boundary  is  then  called  a 
closed  two-dimensional  region,  or  briefly  a  closed  region  or  domain. 

A  simple  curve  is  sometimes  called  a  closed  one-dimensional  region ;  a 
simple  curve  with  its  end-points  omitted  is  then  called  an  open  one-dimensional 
region. 

3'22.     Continuous  functions  of  complex  variables. 

Let  f{z)  be  a  function  of  z  defined  at  all  points  of  a  closed  region  (one-  or 
two-dimensional)  in  the  Argand  diagram,  and  let  z^  be  a  point  of  the  region. 

Then/(^)  is  said  to  be  continuous  at  z-i,  if  given  any  positive  number  e, 
we  can  find  a  corresponding  positive  number  77  such  that 

\f{z)-f{z,)\<e, 
whenever  \z  —  Zy\<  7^  and  ^^  is  a  point  of  the  region. 

3'3.     Series  of  variable  terms.      Uniformity  of  convergence. 
Consider  the  series 

x!^  x^  x^ 

7.2 -I 4-      -1-  -I -  4- 

^  \  -^  x""      {I  +  x-'f  {1  +  x^Y      "" 

This  series  converges  absolutely  (§  2"33)  for  all  real  values  of  x. 
If  8n  {x)  be  the  sum  of  n  terms,  then 

and  so  lim  8^  {x)  =  1  +  a;^ ;  («  ^  0) 

but  >S'„(0)  =  0,  and  therefore    lim  >Sf„(0)=0. 

Consequently,  although  the  series  is  an  absolutely  convergent  series  of 
continuous  functions  of  x,  the  sum  is  a  discontinuous  function  of  x.  We 
naturally  enquire  the  reason  of  this  rather  remarkable  phenomenon,  which 
was  investigated  in  1841-1848  by  Stokes*,  Seidelf  and  Weierstrass J,  who 
shewed  that  it  cannot  occur  except  in  connexion  with  another  phenomenon, 
that  of  non-uniform  convergence,  which  will  now  be  explained. 

*  Collected  Papers,  i.  p.  236. 

+  Munchen  Abhandlunpen,  v.  (1848),  p.  381. 

+  Ges.  Math.  Werke,  1.  pp.  67,  75. 


3'22-3-31]    CONTINUOUS  functions  and  uniform  convergence  45 

Let  the  functions  u^  (z),  u^  (z), ...  be  defined  at  all  points  of  a  closed  region 
of  the  Argand  diagram.     Let 

Sn  (z)  =  Wi  (Z)  +  U^{z)+  ...+  Iln  {z). 

00 

The  condition  that  the  series    S  w„  {z)  should  converge  for  any  particular 

M  =  l 

value  of  z  is  that,  given  e,  a  number  n  should  exist  such  that 

I  Sn+p  {z)  -8n{z)\<e 

for  all  positive  values  of  p,  the  value  of  n  of  course  depending  on  e. 

Let  n  have  the  smallest  integer  value  for  which  the  condition  is  satisfied. 
This  integer  will  in  general  depend  on  the  particular  value  of  z  which  has 
been  selected  for  consideration.  We  denote  this  dependence  by  writing 
n{z)  in  place  of  n.  Now  it  may  happen  that  we  can  find  a  number  N, 
independent  of  z  such  that 

n{z)<  N 

for  all  values  of  z  in  the  region  under  consideration. 

If  this  number  N  exists,  the  series  is  said  to  converge  uniformly 
throughout  the  region. 

If  no  such  number  N  exists,  the  convergence  is  said  to  be  non-uniform*. 

Uniformity  of  convergence  is  thus  a  property  depending  on  a  whole  set  ot 
values  of  z,  whereas  previously  we  have  considered  the  convergence  of  a  series 
for  various  particular  values  of  z,  the  convergence  for  each  value  being  con- 
sidered without  reference  to  the  other  values. 

We  define  the  phrase  '  uniformity  of  convergence  near  a  point  z '  to  mean 
that  there  is  a  definite  positive  number  S  such  that  the  series  converges 
uniformly  in  the  domain  common  to  the  circle  \z  —  Zi\^h  and  the  region  in 
which  the  series  converges. 

3"31.     On  the  condition  for  uniformity  of  convergence\. 

If  Rn,p  {z)  =  Un+\  {z)  +  i*n+2  (^)  +  . . .  +  u^+p  (z),   WB   have   seen   that    the 

necessary  and  sufficient  condition  that    S  Un  {z)  should  converge  uniformly 

n  =  \ 

in  a  region  is  that,  given  any  positive  number  e,  it  should  be  possible  to 
choose  N  independent  of  z  (but  depending  on  e)  such  that 

I  Rn,p  (^)  \  <  e 
for  ALL  positive  integral  values  of  p. 

*  The  reader  who  is  unacquainted  with  the  concept  of  uniformity  of  convergence  will  find  it 
made  much  clearer  by  consulting  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series,  Chap,  vii.,  where  an  illuminatiug 
account  of  Osgood's  graphical  invest  gation  is  given. 

t  This  section  shews  that  it  is  indifferent  whether  uniformity  of  convergence  is  defined  by 
means  of  the  partial  remainder  Ii,^,p(z)  or  by  R^iz).  Writers  differ  in  the  definition  taken 
as  fundamental. 


46  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

If  the  condition  is  satisfied,  by  §  2 '2  2,  Sn  {z)  tends  to  a  limit,  S  (z),  say  for 
each  value  of  z  under  consideration ;  and  then,  since  e  is  independent  of  p, 

|{lim  Rtf^p{z)]\^€, 

and  therefore,  when  n>N, 

S  (z)  -  Sn  (z)  =  { lim  Ej^,^  (^)l  -  Rif^  n-N  (z), 

and  so  \S{z)-Sn{z)\<^e. 

Thus  (writing  \e  for  e)  a  necessary  condition  for  uniformity  of  convergence 
is  that  \S{z)  —  Sn  (z)  \  <  e,  whenever  n>  N  and  N  is  independent  of  z ;  the 
condition  is  also  sufficient ;  for  if  it  is  satisfied  it  follows  as  in  §  2'22  (I) 
that  j  Rn,p  {z)  I  <  2e,  which,  by  definition,  is  the  condition  for  uniformity. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  x  be  real,  the  sum  of  the  series 


1  {x  +  \)      {x+\){'-lx  +  \) {{n-\)x+\}{nx+\} 

is  discontinuous  at  ^=0  and  the  series  is  non-uniformly  convergent  near  x=0. 

The  sum  of  the  first  n   terms   is   easily  seen   to   be   1 zr ;   so  when  x  —  0  the 

''  nx+l 

sum  is  0;  when  ^4=0,  the  sum  is  1. 

The    value    of    Rn  {x)  =  S  {x)  -  Sn{x)    is      -,VT  ^^  •^'  +  0;   so   when   x  is  small,  say 
;»  =  one-hundred-millionth,  the  remainder  after  a  milUon  terms  is  — j or  l-:f7rj-,  so 

the  first  million  terms  of  the  series  do  not  contribute  one  per  cent,  of  the  sum.     And  in 

general,  to  make r  <  e,  it  is  necessary  to  take 

°  '  nx  +  \ 

X    \€ 

Corresponding  to  a  given  e,  no  number  N  exists,  independent  of  x,  such  that  n<JV  for 
all  values  of  x  in  any  interval  including  x=0 ;  for  by  taking  x  sufficiently  small  we  can 
make  n  greater  than  any  number  JV  which  is  independent  of  x.  There  is  therefore  non- 
uniform convergence  near  x  =  0. 

Examjjle  2.     Discuss  the  series 

X  {n{n+l)x^  —  l] 


2 


„Ii  {l+n^x'}{l  +  (n  +  lfx^}' 
in  which  x  is  real. 

^,  ,  1  •      ,  ^^•^'  (n+l)X  ry  X  1 

The  nin  term  can  be  written  ^ 5— „  -  _— f-^ — tinp    9)  so  /b=  ,  ,   -„,  and 

\+n^x^      \  +  {n  +  lf  X'  \+x^ 

[Note.     In  this  examjjle  the  sum  of  the  series  is  not  discontinuous  at  .r  =  0.] 

But  (taking  6<|,  and  jr  4=0),  \  Rn{x)\  <f  iU-'^{n-{-l)  \x\<l  +  {n  +  iy  x^ ;  i.e.  if 
n-t-l>^{e-i-t-v'6-^-4}  1^1-1  or  n  +  l  <i  {f-i- Vf-^- 4}  |^|"^ 


332]  CONTINUOUS   FUNCTIONS   AND   UNIFORM   CONVERGENCE  47 

Now  it  is  not  the  case  that  the  second  inequality  is  satisfied  for  all  values  of  n  greater 
than  a  certain  value  and  for  all  values  of  x ;  and  the  first  inequality  gives  a  value  of 
n  (x)  which  tends  to  infinity  as  ^  -^0  ;  so  that,  corresponding  to  any  interval  containing  the 
point  .r  =  0,  there  is  no  number  N  independent  oi  x.  The  series,  therefore,  is  non-uniformly 
convergent  near  ^=0. 

The  reader  will  observe  that  n{x)  is  discontinuous  at  x  =  Q;  for  n(^)-^oo  as  ^-^0, 
but  n(0)  =  0. 

3'32.     Connexion  of  discontinuity  with  non-uniform  convergence. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  if  a  series  of  continuous  functions  of  z  is  uniformly 
convergent  for  all  values  of  z  in  a  given  closed  domain,  the  sum  is  a  continuous 
function  of  z  at  all  points  of  the  domain. 

For  let  the  series  be  f(z)  =  Ui{z)  +  U2(z)+  ...  +Un(z)  +  ...  =  Sn  (z)  +  Rn  (•s^), 
where  Rn  (z)  is  the  remainder  after  n  terms. 

Since  the  series  is  uniformly  convergent,  given  any  positive  number  e,  we 

can  find  a  corresponding  integer  n  independent  of  z,  such  that  |  Rniz)  i  <  o  e 

for  all  values  of  z  within  the  domain. 

Now  n  and  e  being  thus  fixed,  we  can,  on  account  of  the  continuity  of 
8n  (^),  find  a  positive  number  i)  such  that 

|>Sf,,(^)->S.(/)|<^e, 

whenever  \z  —  z'  \<'r]. 

We  have  then 

I  f{z)  -f{z')  \  =  \[Sn  (Z)  -  Sn  (Z)}  \  +  \  R^  (z)  -  R^  {z')  \ 
<\8n{z)-Sn{z)\+\Rn{z)\  +  \  Rn{z')\ 

<  e, 
which  is  the  condition  for  continuity  at  z. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  near  x  —  0  the  series 

Ui  (x)  +  «2  (x)  +  U3{x)+  ..., 

1  1 

■where  Ui(x)  =  x,     M„(a7)  =  ^^"~^-^-"~^, 

and  real  values  of  x  are  concerned,  is  discontinuous  and  non-iinifornily  convergent. 

In  this  example  it  is  convenient  to  take  a  slightly  different  form  of  the  test ;  we  shall 
shew  that,  given  an  arbitrarily  small  number  e,  it  is  possible  to  choose  values  of  x,  as 
small  as  we  please,  depending  on  n  in  such  a  way  that  |  R^  (x)  \  is  not  less  than  e  for  any 
value  of  n,  no  matter  how  large.  The  reader  will  easily  see  that  the  existence  of  such 
values  of  x  is  inconsistent  with  the  condition  for  uniformity  of  convergence. 
1 

The  value  of  *S',i(*')  is  x^^''~^  ;  as  7i  tends  to  infinity,  S^  {x)  tends  to  I,  0,  or  -  1,  accord- 
ing as  X  is  positive,  zero,  or  negative.  The  series  is  therefore  absolutely  convergent  for  all 
■values  oi  X,  and  has  a  discontinuity  at  :r  =  0. 


48  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

1 

In  this  series  Rji{x)  =  l  -x^"'~^,  {x>0)  ;  however  great  n  maybe,  by  taking*  ;r=e"(2"-i) 
we  can  cause  this  remainder  to  take  the  value  1  —  e~',  which  is  not  arbitrarily  small.  The 
series  is  therefore  non-uniformly  convergent  near  x  =  0. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  near  z  =  0  the  series 

-"  -2g(l+2)»-i 

„£i  {l  +  (l+2)»-i}{l  +  (l+^)~} 
is  non-uniformly  convergent  and  its  sum  is  discontinuous. 
The  nth.  term  can  be  written 

l-(l+2)"  _  l-(l+2)»-l 
1  +  {1+Z)"         l-t-(H-2)"-l' 

1  —  (1+2)" 

SO  the  sum  of  the  first  n  terms  is         .        .    .     Thus,  considering  real  values  of  z  greater 

than  —  1,  it  is  seen  that  the  sum  to  infinity  is  1,  0,  or  —  1,  according  as  z  is  negative,  zero, 
or  positive.  There  is  thus  a  discontinuity  at  2=0.  This  discontinuity  is  explained  by  the 
fact  that  the  series  is  non-uniformly  convergent  near  2=0;  for  the  remainder  after  n  terms 
in  the  series  when  z  is  positive  is 


l+(H-2)»' 


and,  however  great  n   may  be,  by  taking  2  =  7,  this  can  be  made  luimerically  greater 

2 
than ,  which  is  not  arbitrarily  small.     The   series  is  therefore  non-uniformly  con- 
vergent near  2  =  0. 

3'33.     The  distinction  between  absolute  and  uniform  convergence. 

The  uniform  convergence  of  a  series  in  a  domain  does  not  necessitate 
its  absolute  convergence  at  any  points  of  the  domain,  nor  conversely.     Thus 

the  series  2  p. converges  absolutely,  but  (near  z=())  not  uniformly ; 

(1  -|-  z^Y 

while  in  the  case  of  the  series 

V  V  J 

the  series  of  moduli  is 

1 ^ 

which  is  divergent,  so  the  series  is  only  conditionally  convergent ;  but  for  all 
real  values  of  z,  the  terms  of  the  series  are  alternately  positive  and  negative 
and  numerically  decreasing,  so  the  sum  of  the  series  lies  between  the  sum  of 
its  first  n  terms  and  of  its  first  {n+\)  terms,  and  so  the  remainder  after 
n  terms  is  numerically  less  than  the  nth.  term.  Thus  we  only  need  take  a 
finite  number  (independent  of  z)  of  terms  in  order  to  ensure  that  for  all  real 
values  of  z  the  remainder  is  less  than  any  assigned  number  e,  and  so  the 
series  is  uniformly  convergent. 

Absolutely  convergent  series  behave  like  series  with  a  finite  number  of 
terms  in  that  we  can  multiply  them  together  and  transpose  their  terms. 
*  This  value  of  x  satisfies  the  condition  I  a;  j  <  5  whenever  2n  -  1  >  log  5"  1. 


i 


8-33-3-341]    CONTINUOUS  functions  and  uniform  convergence  49 

Uniformly  convergent  series  behave  like  series  with  a  finite  number  of 
terms  in  that  they  are  continuous  if  each  term  in  the  series  is  continuous 
and  (as  we  shall  see)  the  series  can  then  be  integrated  term  by  term, 

3'34.     A  condition,  due  to  Weierstrass* ,  for  uniform  convergence. 

A  sufficient,  though  not  necessary,  condition  for  the  uniform  convergence 
of  a  series  may  be  enunciated  as  follows : — 

If,  for  all  values  of  z  within  a  domain,  the  moduli  of  the  terms  of  a  series 

8=Ui  (z)  +  Wa  (z)  +U3(2)+  ... 

are  respectively  less  than  the  corresponding  terms  in  a  convergent  series 
of  positive  terms 

where  Mn  is  independent  of  z,  then  the  series  S  is  uniformly  convergent  in 
this  region.  This  follows  from  the  fact  that,  the  series  T  being  convergent, 
it  is  always  possible  to  choose  n  so  that  the  remainder  after  the  first  n  terms 
of  T,  and  therefore  the  modulus  of  the  remainder  after  the  first  n  terms 
of  S,  is  less  than  an  assigned  positive  number  e;  and  since  the  value  of  n 
thus  found  is  independent  of  z,  it  follows  (§  3"31)  that  the  series  S  is  uni- 
formly convergent ;  by  §  2"34,  the  series  S  also  converges  absolutely. 

Example.     The  series 

cos  2  + -,  COS'' 2  4- ;Ti  COS^  2  +  . . . 

is  uniformly  convergent  for  all  real  values  of  2,  becavise  the  moduli  of  its  terms  are  not 
greater  than  the  corresponding  terms  of  the  convergent  series 

I  +  2I  +  3-2+-, 
whose  terms  are  positive  constants. 

3*341.      Uniformity  of  convergence  of  infinite  products^. 

A  convergent  product  11  {1  +  Un  (2)}  is  said  to  converge  uniformly  in  a  domain  of  values 
of  2  if,  given  e,  we  can  find  m  independent  of  2  such  that 

I  m+p  m  1 

n  {i-i-ii„(2)}-  n  {i+M„(2)}|<< 

I   n=\  n=l  1 

for  all  positive  integral  values  of  p. 

The  only  condition  for  uniformity  of  convergence  which  will  be  used  in  this  work 
is  that  the  product  converges  uniformly  if  |  Un  (2)  j  <  M^  where  l/„  is  independent  of  2  and 

2  Mn  converges. 

n=l 

*  Ahhandlungen  aus  der  Funktionenlehre,  p.  70.  The  test  given  by  this  condition  is  usually 
described  (e.g.  by  Osgood,  A^mals  of  Mathematics,  Vol.  in.  p.  130)  as  the  il/-test. 

t  The  definition  is,  effectively,  that  given  by  Osgood,  Funktionentheorie,  p.  462.  Tlie 
condition  here  given  for  uniformity  of  convergence  is  also  established  in  that  work. 

W.    M.    A.  4 


dO  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  ^  [CHAP.  Ill 

To  prove  the  validity  of  the  condition  we  observe  that  n  (l  +  Mn)  converges  (§  2"7), 
and  so  we  can  choose  m  such  that 

m+p  m 

n    {l  +  M^}-    a  {l+M,,}<e; 
n=l  ?i=l 

and  then  we  have 


m+p  m 

n  {i+u^{z)}-  n  {l  +  u„{z)} 


=    n  {i+u,{z)}\     n    {i+«„(^)}-i 

1  n=l  \_n  =  m+l  J  | 

^n{l  +  M„)\     n     {l  +  Mn}-l\ 


and  the  choice  of  m  is  independent  of  z. 

3*35.     Hardy's  tests  for  uniform  convergence* . 

The  reader  will  see,  from  §  2-31,  that  if,  in  a  given  domain,      2  a„  (2)  \^k  where  «„(«)  is- 

I  n=l  I 

real  and  k  is  finite  and   independent  of  p  and  2,  and  if  /n  (2)  ^./ji  + 1  (2)  and  /„(2)-^0 
unifoTinly  as  n  ^.  oo  ,  then    2  a„  (2)/n  (■^)  converges  uniformly. 

n=\ 

Also  that  if 

^  ^  w™  (2)  ^  w„  + 1  (2)  ^  0, 

where  k  is  independent  of  2  and    2    «„  (2)  converges  uniformly,  then    2  a„  (?)  «„  (2)  con- 
verges  uniformly.     [To  prove  the  latter,  observe  that  to  can  be  found  such  that 

«»»  +  l(2),    «m  +  l(2)  +  «OT  +  2(4  •••,     «m  +  l(2)+«m  +  2(«)  +  ---+«m  +  p(2) 

are  numerically  less  than  ilk  ;  and  therefore  (§  2-301) 

I    m-Vv  I 

2     a„  (2)  M„  (2)    <  eM^  + 1  (2)/^  <  f , 

and  the  choice  of  t  and  to  is  independent  of  2.] 
'    Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  S  >  0,  the  series 

*    cos  n^        "*    sin  nB 
2     2     

converge  uniformly  in  the  range 

S  <  ^  ^  27r  -  S. 

Obtain  the  corresponding  result  for  the  series 

°"    ( —  )"■  cos  n6        °°    ( -  )"  sin  n6 
2  ,        2  , 

7i=\  n  n=i  n 

by  writing  6 +  17  for  6. 

Example.  2.     If,  when  a^x^b,  |a)„(.r)|<^i   and   2    |  co„  +  i  (a;)-o)„  (^)  |  <^2)  where 

M  =  l 

X-j,  ^2  ai"6  independent  of  n  and  ^,  and  if  2  an  is  a  convergent  series  independent  of  x, 

n=l 
then  2  a„a)„(j7)  converges  uniformly  when  a  ^^^6.  (Hardy.) 

12=1 

*  Proc.  London  Math.  Sac.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  iv.  (1907),  pp.  247-265.  These  results,  which  are 
generalisations  of  Abel's  theorem  (§  3-71,  below),  though  well  known,  do  not  appear  to  have  been 
published  before  1907.  From  their  resemblance  to  the  tests  of  Dirichlet  and  Abel  for  con- 
vergence, Bromwich  proposes  to  call  them  Diiichlet's  and  Abel's  tests  respectively. 


3-35-3"4]    CONTINUOUS  functions  and  uniform  convergence  51 

<i,  and  then,  by  §  2-301 


I     m+p 

[For  we  can  choose  m,  independent  of  x,  such  that        2     a„ 

I  n=w+l 
m+p 

2     a„«„(j?)  <{kt-i-k2)f.] 

n=m+l 


corollary,  we  have 


3'4.     Discussion  of  a  particular  double  series. 

Let  tui  and  Wg  be  any  constants  whose  ratio  is  not  purely  real;  and  let 
a  be  positive. 

The  series   S  -. ^ ^i zz ,  in  which  the  summation  extends  over 

all  positive  and  negative  integral  and  zero  values  of  m  and  n,  is  of  great 
importance  in  the  theory  of  Elliptic  Functions.  At  each  of  the  points 
z  =  —  2mwi  —  2n.G)2  the  series  does  not  exist.  It  can  be  shewn  that  the  series 
converges  absolutely  for  all  other  values  of  ^^  if  a  >  2,  and  the  convergence  is 
uniform  for  those  values  of  z  such  that  |  z  +  2m&)i  +  2nco^  j  ^  S  for  all  integral 
values  of  m  and  n,  where  B  is  an  arbitrary  positive  number. 

Let  S  denote  a  summation  for  all  integral  values  of  m  and  n,  the  term  for 
which  m=n  =  0  being  omitted. 

Now,  if  m  and  n  are  not  both  zero,  and  if  |  2r  4-  2m(Oi  +  2nco2 1  ^  S  >  0  for 
all  integral  values  of  m  and  n,  then  we  can  find  a  positive  number  G,  de- 
pending on  B  but  not  on  z,  such  that 

1  '<c!        1 


(z  +  27710)1  +  2na)2)°- 1  I  (2mft)i  +  2weo2)°'  \ 

Consequently,  by  §  3"34,  the  given  series  is  absolutely  and  uniformly* 
convergent  in  the  domain  considered  if 


I  mcoi  +  710)2 1 " 
converges. 

To  discuss  the  convergence  of  the  latter  series,  let 

0)i  =  «!  +  i^i ,      0)2  =  Oa  +  i^2, 

where  a^,  a^,  yQj,  ySg  are  real.     Since  0)2/0)1  is  not  real,  ai/32  — Oa/Si  =f  0.     Then 
the  series  is 

S 1 

This  converges  (§  2 "5  corollary)  if  the  series 

S  =  t' ^ 

(771-  +  n-f"^ 

converges ;  for  the  quotient  of  corresponding  terms  is 


1  +  ix' 

The  reader  will  easily  define  uniformity  of  convergence  of  double  series  (see  §  3-5). 

4—2 


62  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

where  /x  =  w/m.  This  expression,  qua  function  of  a  continuous  real  variable  fx, 
can  be  proved  to  have  a  positive  minimum  *  (not  zero)  since  OjySj  —  aa/Si  =f  0 ; 
and  so  the  quotient  is  always  greater  than  a  positive  number  K  (independent 
of  /a). 

We  have  therefore  only  to  study  the  convergence  of  the  series  8.     Let 

50  9  1         . 

t 


*■'  r^-p    rZ-q  (m^  +  71^)^*  ' 

1 


<4  t   t 


Separating  /Sp_  q  into  the  terms  for  which  m  =  n,  m>n,  and  m<n,  re- 
spectively, we  have 

pi  p    m-\  1  q     n-\  1 


M-1  (2m2)i''      m=i  w=o  (m^  +  n^)^"      «=i  m=o  (m^  +  ri^)** 
But  "S'         ^  ^  ^ 


Therefore  i>S^  S  ^^  +  5  -^  +  i  —  . 

But  these  last  series  are  known  to  be  convergent  if  a  —  1  >  1.  So  the  series  8 
is  convergent  if  a  >  2.  The  original  series  is  therefore  absolutely  and  uni- 
formly convergent,  when  a  >  2,  for  the  specified  range  of  values  of  z. 

Example.     Prove  that  the  series 

X ' , 

(»ii2 + wig^  + . . .  +  m^^)'' 

in  which  the  summation  extends  over  all  positive  and  negative  integral  values  and  zero 
values  of  mi,  m2, ...  m^,  except  the  set  of  simultaneous  zero  values,  is  absolutely  convergent 
if  fji>jir.  (Eisenstein,  Crelle,  xxxv.) 

3'5.     The  concept  of  uniformity. 

There  are  processes  other  than  that  of  summing  a  series  in  which  the  idea 
of  uniformity  is  of  importance. 

Let  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number;  and  let  f(z,  ^)  be  a  function  of 
two  variables  z  and  ^,  which,  for  each  point  ^  of  a  closed  region,  satisfies  the 
inequality  \f{z,  ^)  |  <  e  when  ^  is  given  any  one  of  a  certain  set  of  values 
which  will  be  denoted  by  (^2) ;  the  particular  set  of  values  of  course  depends 
on  the  particular  value  of  z  under  consideration.  If  a  set  (^)o  can  be  found 
such  that  every  member  of  the  set  (^)o  is  a  member  of  all  the  sets  (Q,  the 
function  f(z,  ^)  is  said  to  satisfy  the  inequality  uniformly  for  all  points  z  of 

*  The  reader  will  find  no   difficulty  in    verifying   tliis  statement ;    the  minimum   value  in 
question  is  given  by 

K-^''^  =  ^  [Cti2  +  a22  +  ^i2  +  p,2  _  I  („j  _  ^^)2  +  (^2  +  ^i)2}i  {  (aj  +  p,)2  +  (a^  -  ^1)2}  ij. 


35,  36]         CONTINUOUS   FUNCTIONS   AND   UNIFORM   CONVERGENCE  53 

the  region.  And  if  a  function  4>  (^)  possesses  some  property,  for  every  positive 
value  of  e,  in  virtue  of  the  inequality  \f{z,  ^)  |  <  e,  ^  (z)  is  then  said  to  possess 
the  property  uniformly. 

In  addition  to  the  uniformity  of  convergence  of  series  and  products,  we  shall  have 
to  consider  uniformity  of  convergence  of  integrals  and  also  uniformity  of  continuity ;  thus 
a  series  is  uniformly  convergent  when  \  Rn{z)\<f,  f(  =  n)  assuming  integer  values  in- 
dependent of  z  only. 

Further,  a  function  f{z)  is  continuous  in  a  closed  region  if,  given  t,  we  can  find  a 
positive  nimaber  i;,  such  that  \f{z  +  Ci)  ~f{'^)  I  <  f  whenever 

^<\Cz\<riz 
and  2+f  is  a  point  of  the  region. 

The  function  will  be  uniformly  continuous  if  we  can  find  a  positive  number  rf  inde- 
pendent of  2,  such  that  t]  <r]g  and  \f{z  +  ()  -f{z)  \  < e  whenever 

0<lC|<i7 
and  z  +  ^  is  a  point  of  the  region,  (in  this  case  the  set  (f)o  is  the  set  of  points  whose 
moduli  are  less  than  17). 

We  shall  find  later  (§  3*61 )  that  continuity  involves  uniformity  of  continuity  ;  this  is 
in  marked  contradistinction  to  the  fact  that  convergence  does  not  involve  uniformity 
of  convergence. 

3'6.     The  modified  Heine-Borel  theorem. 

The  following  theorem  is  of  great  importance  in  connexion  with  properties 
of  uniformity ;  we  give  a  proof  for  a  one-dimensional  closed  region  *. 

Given  (i)  a  straight  line  CD  and  (ii)  a  law  by  which,  corresponding  to 
each  pointf  P  of  CD,  we  can  associate  a  closed  interval  I(P)  of  CD,  P  being 
an  interior],  point  of  I{P). 

Then  the  line  CD  can  be  divided  into  a  finite  number  of  closed  intervals 
Ji,  J2,  •■•  Jk,  such  that  each  interval  Jr  contains  at  lea^t  one  point  {not  an  end 
point)  Pr,  such  that  no  point  of  Jr  lies  outside  the  interval  I{Pr)  associated 
{by  means  of  the  given  law)  with  that  point  Pr^. 

A  closed  interval  of  the  nature  just  described  will  be  called  a  suitable 
interval,  and  will  be  said  to  satisfy  condition  {A). 

If  CD  satisfies  condition  (A),  what  is  required  is  prov^ed.  If  not,  bisect  CD; 
if  either  or  both  of  the  intervals  into  which  CD  is  divided  is  not  suitable, 
bisect  it  or  themj|. 

*  A  formal  proof  of  the  theorem  for  a  two-dimensional  region  will  be  found  in  Watson's 
Complex  Integration  and  Cauchy\  Theorem  (Camb.  Math.  Tracts,  No.  15). 

t  Examples  of  such  laws  associating  intervals  with  points  will  be  found  in  §§  3'61,  5"13. 

X  Except  when  P  is  at  C  or  D,  when  it  is  an  end  point. 

§  This  statement  of  the  Heine-Borel  theorem  is  given  in  Hobson's  Functions  of  a  Real 
Variable,  p.  87,  where  it  is  pointed  out  that  the  theorem  is  practically  given  in  Goursat's  proof 
of  Cauchy's  theorem  {Trans.  American  Math.  Sac.  Vol.  i.  p.  15) ;  the  ordinary  form  of  the 
Heine-Borel  theorem  with  historical  references  will  also  be  found  in  the  treatise  cited. 

II  A  suitable  interval  is  not  to  be  bisected ;  for  one  of  the  parts  into  which  it  is  divided 
might  not  be  suitable. 


54  THE   PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

This  process  of  bisecting  intervals  which  are  not  suitable  either  will 
terminate  or  it  will  not.  If  it  does  terminate,  the  theorem  is  proved,  for  CD 
will  have  been  divided  into  suitable  intervals. 

Suppose  that  the  process  does  not  terminate ;  and  let  an  interval,  which 
can  be  divided  into  suitable  intervals  by  the  process  of  bisection  just  described, 
be  said  to  satisfy  condition  {B). 

Then,  by  h3rpothesis,  CD  does  not  satisfy  condition  {B) ;  therefore  at  least 
one  of  the  bisected  portions  of  CD  does  not  satisfy  condition  {B).  Take  that 
one  which  does  not  (if  neither  satisfies  condition  {B)  take  the  left-hand  one) ; 
bisect  it  and  select  that  bisected  part  which  does  not  satisfy  condition  (J5). 
This  process  of  bisection  and  selection  gives  an  unending  sequence  of  intervals 
*oj  *i>  *2'  •••  such  that: 

(i)      The  length  of  s„  is  2-"Ci). 

(ii)     No  point  of  5^+]  is  outside  Sn. 

(iii)     The  interval  s„  does  not  satisfy  condition  {A). 

Let  the  distances  of  the  end  points  of  Sn  from  C  be  Xn,  yn\  then 
sOn^Xn+\<yn+\'^yn-  Therefore,  by  §  2*2,  Xn  and  yn  have  limits;  and,  by  the 
condition  (i)  above,  these  limits  are  the  same,  say  |^ ;  let  Q  be  the  point  whose 
distance  from  C  is  ^.  But,  by  hypothesis,  there  is  a  number  Sq  such  that 
every  point  of  CD,  whose  distance  from  Q  is  less  than  Sq,  is  a  point  of  the 
associated  interval  I {Q).  Choose  n  so  large  that  2~^CD  <  8q;  then  Q  is  an 
internal  point  or  end  point  of  5„  and  the  distance  of  every  point  of  Sn  fi'om 
Qis  less  than  Sq.  And  therefore  the  interval  «„  satisfies  condition  (A),  which 
is  contrary  to  condition  (iii)  above.  The  hypothesis  that  the  process  of 
bisecting  intervals  does  not  terminate  therefore  involves  a  contradiction ; 
therefore  the  process  does  terminate  and  the  theorem  is  proved. 

In  the  two-dimensional  form  of  the  theorem*,  the  interval  CD  is  replaced  by  a  closed 
two-dimensional  region,  the  interval  I{P)  by  a  circlet  with  centre  P,  and  the  interval 
J  (Fn)  by  a  square  with  sides  parallel  to  the  axes. 

3*61.     Uniformity  of  continuity. 

From  the  theorem  just  proved,  it  follows  without  difficulty  that  if  a 
function  f(x)  of  a  real  variable  x  is  continuous  when  a^x^b,  then  f(x) 
is  uniformly  continuous  J  throughout  the  range  a^x^b. 

For  let  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number;  then,  in  virtue  of  the  con- 
tinuity of  f(x),  corresponding  to  any  value  of  x,  we  can  find  a  positive 
number  Bx,  depending  on  oc,  such  that 

\f(x)-fix)\<le 

for  all  values  of  x'  such  that  \x'  —  x\<  Bx- 

*  The  reader  will  see  that  a  proof  may  be  constructed  on  similar  lines  by  drawiug  a  square 
circumscribing  the  region  and  carrying  out  a  process  of  dividing  squares  into  four  equal 
squares. 

t  Or  the  portion  of  the  circle  which  lies  inside  the  region. 

X  This  result  is  due  to  Heine;  see  Crelle,  lxxi.  p.  361,  and  lxxiv.  p.  188. 


3'61,  362]     CONTINUOUS  functions  and  uniform  convergence  55 

Then  by  §  3"6  we  can  divide  the  range  (a,  b)  into  a,  finite  number  of  closed 
intervals  with  the  property  that  in  each  interval  there  is  a  number  x^  such 

that  \f(x')—f{xi)  I  <  4  e,  whenever  x'  lies  in  the  interval  in  which  a?,  lies. 

Let  ^0  be  the  length  of  the  smallest  of  these  intervals ;  and  let  ^,  ^'  be 
any  two  numbers  in  the  closed  range  (a,  6)  such  that  |  ^  —  |'  1  <  So-  Then 
^,  f'  lie  in  the  same  or  in  adjacent  intervals;  if  they  lie  in  adjacent  intervals 
let  fo  be  the  common  end  point.  Then  we  can  find  numbers  x^,  x^,  one  in 
each  interval,  such  that 

l/(n-/(^i)l<S€,         l/(|o)-/WI<ie, 

l/(r)-/(^2)i<i^,          l/(ro)-/(^2)|<ie, 
so  that 

i/(i)-/(r)i=ii/(^)-/(.^i)i  -  {/(?o)-/(^oi 

-i.Ar)-/(^.)}  +  {/(io)-/(^.)}i 

<  6. 

If  f,  ^'  lie  in  the  same  interval,  we  can  prove  similarly  that 

i/(i)-/(r)i<2^- 

In  either  case  we  have  shewn  that,  for  any  number  f  in  the  range, 
we  have 

l/(l)-/(^+DI<6 

whenever  |^4-  f  is  in  the  range  and  —  So  <  ^<K,  where  So  is  independent  of  ^. 
The  uniformity  of  the  continuity  is  therefore  established. 

Corollary  (i).  From  the  two-dimensional  form  of  the  theorem  of  §  3  "6  we  can  prove 
that  a  function  of  a  complex  variable,  continuous  at  all  points  of  a  closed  region  of  the 
Argand  diagram,  is  uniformly  continuous  throughout  that  region. 

Corollary  (ii).  A  function  f{x)  which  is  continuous  throughout  the  range  a ^^^6  is 
bounded  in  the  range  ;  that  is  to  say  we  can  find  a  number  k  independent  of  x  such  that 
\f{x)  \<K  for  all  points  x  in  the  range. 

[Let  n  be  the  number  of  parts  into  which  the  range  is  divided. 

Let  a,  £i,  ^2)  •••  ^n-l^  ^  be  their  end  points  ;  then  if  x  be  any  point  of  the  rth  interval 
we  can  find  numbers  Xi,  X2,  ...  Xn  such  that 

LA«)-/(^i)l<if,    \f(^i)-f{^i)\<h,    \f{^i)-f(^2)\<b,    l/(^2)-/(^2)l<K- 

...!/(^r-i)-/WI<^- 

Therefore  \f{a)—f{x)  \  <  \re,  and  so 

l/WI<l/(«)l  +  i^f> 
which  is  the  required  result,  since  the  right-hand  side  is  indej^endent  of  x.'\ 

The  corresponding  theorem  for  functions  of  complex  variables  is  left  to  the  reader. 

3'62.  A  real  function,  of  a  real  variable,  continuous  in  a  closed  interval, 
attains  its  upper  bound. 

Let  f{x)  be  a  real  continuous  function  of  x  when  a^x  ^b.  Form  a 
section  in  which  the  ii-class  consists  of  those  numbers  r  such  that  r  >f(x) 


56  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

for  all  values  of  x  in  the  range  (a,  h),  and  the  Z-class  of  all  other  numbers. 
This  section  defines  a  number  a  such  that  f{x)  ^  a,  but,  if  Z  be  any  positive 
number,  values  of  x  in  the  range  exist  such  that  f{x)  >  a  —  8.  Then  a  is 
called  the  upper  hound  oi  f{x);  and  the  theorem  states  that  a  number  x 
in  the  range  can  be  found  such  that  f{x')  =  a. 

For,  no  matter  how  small  8  may  be,  we  can  find  vahies  of  x  for  which 
\f{x)—a\~'^>h~''^;  therefore .  j{/(i»)  -  a}  I  ~^  is  not  bounded  in  the  range; 
therefore  (§  3"61  cor.  (ii))  it  is  not  continuous  at  some  point  or  points  of  the 
range;  but  since  \f{x)  —  a\  is  continuous  at  all  points  of  the  range,  its  re- 
ciprocal is  continuous  at  all  points  of  the  range  (§  3*2,  example)  except 
those  points  at  which  f{x)  =  a ;  therefore  f{x)  =  a  at  some  point  of  the 
range;   the  theorem  is  therefore  proved. 

Corollary  (i).  The  lower  bound  of  a  continuous  function  may  be  defined 
in  a  similar  manner ;  and  a  continuous  function  attains  its  lower  bound. 

Corollary  (ii).  If  f{z)  be  a  function  of  a  complex  variable  continuous  in 
a  closed  region,  I  f{z)  \  attains  its  upper  bound 

3'63.  A  real  function,  of  a  real  variable,  continuous  in  a  closed  interval, 
attains  all  values  between  its  upper  and  lower  bounds. 

Let  M,  m  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  off(x);  then  we  can  find  numbers 
^>  ^.  by  §  3"62,  such  that /(^)  =  M,f{x)  =  m\  let  fi  be  any  number  such  that 
m  <  fx<M.  Given  any  positive  number  e,  we  can  (by  §  3"61)  divide  the  range 
{x,  x)  into  a.  finite  number,  r,  of  closed  intervals  such  that 

\f(x,^r^)-fix,^'-^)\<e, 

where  aJi'*"',  i»2""'  are  any  points  of  the  7^th  interval;  take  *-i""',  a;,*'''  to  be 
the  end  points  of  the  interval ;  then  there  is  at  least  one  of  the  intervals 
for  which/(iCi''"')  -  /a,  /(aJa""*)  -  yu.  have  opposite  signs  ;  and  since 

\{f(x,^r^)-,M]-{f(x,ir>)-^]\<e, 

it  follows  that  \f(x,^'-^)-fi  |  <  e. 

Since  we  can  find  a  number  Xi^^^  to  satisfy  this  inequality  for  all  values 
of  e,  no  matter  how  small,  the  lower  bound  of  the  function  [  f(x)  —  /a  |  is 
zero ;  since  this  is  a  continuous  function  of  x,  it  follows  from  §  3"62  cor.  (i) 
that  f{x)  —  [JL  vanishes  for  some  value  of  x. 

3"64.     The  fluctuation  of  a  function  of  a  real  variable*. 
Let /(a;)  be  a  real  bounded  function,  defined  when  ai^x  ^  b.     Let 
a^x-i^^x.2,1^  ...  -^ Xn ^ b. 

Then  \f(a)-f(x,)\  +  \f(x,)-f(x,)\  +  ...+\f(xn)-f(b)\  is  called  the 
fluctuation  oi  f(x)  in  the  range  (a,  b)  for  the  set  of  subdivisions  x^,  x.^, ...  Xn. 

*  The  terminology  of  this  section  is  partly  that  of  Hobson,  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable  and 
partly  that  of  Young,  Sets  of  Points. 


3-63-3-71]      CONTINUOUS   FUNCTIONS   AND   UNIFORM   CONVERGENCE  57 

If  the  fluctuation  have  an  upper  bound  FJ*,  independent  of  n,  for  all  choices  of 
x^,  003,  ...Xn,  then  f(x)  is  said  to  have  limited  total  Jluctuation  in  the  range 
(a,  b).     FJ*  is  called  the  total  fluctuation  in  the  range. 

Example  1.  If  f{x)  be  monotonic  in  the  range  (a,  b],  its  total  fluctuation  in  the  range 
i8|/(a)-/Wl- 

Example  2.  A  function  with  limited  total  fluctuation  can  be  expressed  as  the  differ- 
ence of  two  positive  increasing  monotonic  functions, 

[These  functions  may  be  taken  to  be  |  {/^/+/(^)},  h  {Fa''-f{x)}.] 

Example  3.  If  f{x)  have  limited  total  fluctuation  in  the  range  (a,  b),  then  the  limits 
f{x±0)  exist  at  all  points  in  the  interior  of  the  range.     [See  §  3'2  example.] 

Example  4.     If  f{x),  g  {x)  have  limited  total  fluctuation  in  the  range  (a,  b)  so  has 

[For         \f{x')gia/)-f{x)g{x)\^\fix')\.  \g{x')-g{x)  \  +  \g{x)\.  \f{x')-f{x)  |, 
and  so  the  total  fluctuation  of  f{x)  g{x)  cannot  exceed  g  .  FJ'+f .  GJ',  where/,  g  are  the 
upper  bounds  of  \f{x)  \,  \g(x)  |.] 

3*7.      Uniformity  of  convergence  of  power  series. 

Let  the  power  series 

tto  +  a■^z  4-  ...  +a,i^"  +  ... 
converge  absolutely  when  z  =  z^. 

Then,  if  |  2^  |  ^  |  ^o  I ,  I  o^nZ'^  |  ^  |  a„2o"  | . 

CO 

But  since    2  |  anZ^^  \  converges,  and  is  a  series  of  positive  terms  independent 
»=o 

00 
of  z,  it  follows,  by  §  3*34,  that    2  anZ'^  converges  uniformly  with  regard  to 

the  variable  z  when  j  ^^  |  ^  |  ^0  !• 

Hence,  by  |  3"32,  a  power  series  is  a  continuous  function  of  the  variable 
throughout  the  closed  region  formed  by  the  interior  and  boundary  of  any 
circle  concentric  with  the  circle  of  convergence  and  of  smaller  radius  (§  2'6). 

3'71.     Abel's  theorem*  on  continuity  up  to  the  circle  of  convergence. 

Let    2    a^z"^  be  a  power  series,  whose  radius  of  convergence  is  unity,  such 
«=o 
00 
that    2  ttn  converges;   and  let  O^^a;^!;  then  Abel's  theorem  asserts  that 

M  =  0 

(00  \  00 

2  anX^ )  =  2  a^- 
~    -  ^      w=0  /         n=0 

For,  with  the  notation  of  §  3'35,  the  function  a;"-  satisfies  the  conditions 

00 
laid  on  Un{x),  when  0^«^1;   consequently  f(oc)=  2  a,i*'*  converges  loii- 

n  =  0 

*  Crelle's  Journal,  1.  (1826),  pp.  311-339,  Tlieorem  iv.  Abel's  proof  employs  directly  the 
arguments  by  which  the  theorems  of  §  3-32  and  §  3  "35  are  proved.  In  the  case  when  2  «„  | 
converges,  the  theorem  is  obvious  from  §  3-7. 


58  THE   PEOCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

formly  throughout  the  range  O^^a;^!  ;  it  is  therefore,  by  §3'32,  a  continuous 
function  of  x  throughout  the  range,  and  so    lim  f(x)  =/(l),  which  is  the 

x^-l-O 

theorem  stated. 

3'72.     Abel's  theorem*  on  multiplication  of  series. 

This  is  a  modification  of  the  theorem  of  §  2*53  for  absolutely  convergent 
series. 

Let  Cn  =  aobn-\-  «! 6n-i  +  . . .  +  anbo. 

00  «)  00 

Then  the  convergence  of  %  an,    S  bn  and   X  Cn  is  a  suficient  condition  that 

I  2  a,J    Z  6„    =  2  Cn. 

\n=0       J   \n=0       /        M=0 

For,  let 

A{x)=  2  a„a;",      B{x)=  2  6«a;»,      0(a;)=  2  c„a;". 

>i  =  0  «  =  0  M=0 

Then  the  series  for  A{x),  B{x),  C(x)  are  absolutely  convergent  when 
I  a;  I  <  1,  (§  2"6) ;  and  consequently,  by  §  2"53, 

A{x)B(x)=C(x) 

when  0  <  i»  <  1 ;  therefore,  by  §  2'2  example  2, 

{  lim    A{x)]{    lim    B(x)]  =  {    lim    C{x)^ 

a:-^l-0  a;-».l-0  a;^.l-0 

provided  that  these  three  limits  exist;  but,  by  §  3'71,  these  three  limits  are 

00  00  CO 

2  o-nj     X  K>     S  c„ ;   and  the  theorem  is  proved. 

M=0  w=0  w=0 

3'73.     Power  series  which  vanish  identically. 

If  a  convergent  power  series  vanishes  for  all  values  of  z  such  that  \z\^r-^, 
where  r-^  >  0,  then  all  the  coeffi^cients  in  the  power  series  vanish. 

For,  if  not,  let  a^  be  the  first  coefficient  which  does  not  vanish. 

Then  am-\-am+iZ  +  am^2z'^+  •••  vanishes  for  all  values  of  z  (zero  excepted) 
and  converges  absolutely  when  1 2^  |  ^  r  <  rj ;  hence,  if  s  =  «,„+!  -<■  am+2^  +  . . . ,  we 
have 

00 

I  s  I  ^  2  I  a^-irn  I  ^"     ) 

n  =  \ 

and  so  we  can  findf  a  positive  number  S  ^  r  such  that,  whenever  j  ^^  j  ^  S, 

I  ^m+1'2'  +  am^^Z    +...1^21  ^m  \  \ 

and  then   |  am  + «  I  ^  |c<^jw  I  —  |  *  I  >  2  I  ^w»  |,  and  so   \am-\-s\^0   when    \z\<h. 

*  Crelle's  Journal,  i.  (182G),  pp.  311-339,  Theorem  vi.  This  is  Abel's  original  proof.  In 
some  text-books  a  more  elaborate  proof,  by  the  use  of  Cesaro's  sums  (§  8-43),  is  given. 

t  It  is  sufficient  to  take  5  to  be  the  smaller  of  the  numbers  r  and  i  |  «m  !^  2  |  a^+„  |  r"~i. 

n=l 


3-72,  3-73]     CONTINUOUS  functions  and  uniform  convergence  59 

We   have   therefore   arrived   at   a   contradiction   by   supposing   that   some 
coefficient  does  not  vanish.     Therefore  all  the  coefficients  vanish. 

Corollary  1.     We  may  'equate  corresponding  coefficients '  in  two  power 
series  whose  sums  are  equal  throughout  the  region  \z\<h,  where  S  >  0. 

Corollary  2.     We  may  also  equate  coefficients  in  two  power  series  which 
are  proved  equal  only  when  z  is  real. 

REFERENCES. 

T.  J.  Fa.  Bromwich,  Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  Ch.  vii. 

E.  GouRSAT,  Coxirs  d' Analyse,  Chs.  i,  xiv. 

C.   J.    DE    LA    Vall^e    PoussiU,    Cours   d^ Analyse  Infinitesimale,   Introduction    and 
Ch.  vin. 

G.  H.  Hardy,  A  course  of  Pure  Mathematics,  Ch.  v. 

W.  F.  Osgood,  Lehrhuch  der  Funktionentheorie,  Chs.  ii,  in. 

G.    N.   Watson,  Complex  Integration  a^ad  Gauchy's   Theorem  (Camb.   Math.   Tracts, 
No.  15),  Chs.  I,  II. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.     Shew  that  the  series 


A  (1-2")  (1-2"^') 

is  equal  to  7:; rx  when  |  z  I  <  1  and  is  equal  to  —tt r^  when  \z\>\. 

{\  —  zf  z{\  —  zY 

Is  this  fact  connected  with  the  theory  of  uniform  convergence  ? 

2.  Shew  that  the  series 

28ini  +  4sinl  +  ...  +  2™sin3L  +  ... 

converges  absolutely  for  all  values  of  2  (2  =  0  excepted),  but  does  not  converge  uniformly 
near  2  =  0. 

3.  If  «„(.r)=-2(?i-l)2.re-(™-i)'-'^''+2'rt,2^e-"''^, 

shew  that   2    Un{x)  does  not  converge  uniformly  near  x=0.  (Math.  Trip.,  1907.) 

4.  Shew  that  the  series  —p. ^  +  -r-— ...  is  convergent,  but  that  its  square  (formed 

by  Abel's  rule) 

is  divergent. 

5.  If  the  convergent  series  «  =  y7  ~  H'r +  ^  ~  2r  "^•"  ^'"'^^^  ^®  multiplied  by  itself 
the  terms  of  the  product  being  arranged  as  in  Abel's  result,  shew  that  the  resulting  series 
diverges  if  r  ^  |^  but  converges  to  the  sum  s^  if  /•  >  |.  (Cauchy  and  Cajori.) 


60  THE   PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Ill 

6.  If  the  two  conditionally  convergent  series 

00    /'_Nn  +  X  00    /  _'\H  +  1 

2  ^ — '- —  and  2  ^^ — V    . 

where  r  and  s  lie  between  0  and  1,  be  multiplied  together,  and  the  product  arranged  as  in 
Abel's  result,  shew  that  the  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for  the  convergence  of  the 
resulting  series  is  7"  +  5>  1.  (Cajori.) 

7.  Shew  that  if  the  series  l-|^  +  i-|+... 

be  multiplied  by  itself  any  number  of  times,  the  terms  of  the  product  being  arranged  as 
in  Abel's  result,  the  resulting  series  converges.  (Cajori.) 

8.  Shew  that  the  g-th  power  of  the  series 

ajsin  ^  +  02 sin  2^  +  ...  +  a„sin«^+... 
is  convergent  whenever  q{\-r)<\,r  being  the  greatest  number  satisfying  the  relation 

for  all  values  of  n. 

9.  Shew  that  if  6  is  not  equal  to  0  or  a  multiple  of  27r,  and  if  Uq,  Mj,  U2,  ...  be  a 
sequence  such  that  Un'-*-0  steadily,  then  the  series  2w„  cos  {nd  +  a)  is  convergent. 

Shew  also  that,  if  the  limit  of  m„  is  not  zero,  but  «„  is  still   monotonie,  the  sum 

6  6 

of  the  series  is  oscillatory  if  —  is  rational,  but  that,  if  —   is  irrational,  the  sum  may 

TT  TV 

have  any  value  between  certaii)  bounds  whose  difference  is  a  cosec|^,  where  a=  lim  m„. 

(Math.  Trip.,  1896.) 


CHAPTER  IV 

THE   THEORY  OF  RIEMANN  INTEGRATION 

4*1.     The  concept  of  integration. 

The  reader  is  doubtless  familiar  with  the  idea  of  integration  as  the 
operation  inverse  to  that  of  differentiation ;  and  he  is  equally  well  aware  that 
the  integral  (in  this  sense)  of  a  given  elementary  function  is  not  always 
expressible  in  terms  of  elementary  functions.  In  order  therefore  to  give 
a  definition  of  the  integral  of  a  function  which  shall  be  always  available, 
even  though  it  is  not  practicable  to  obtain  a  function  of  which  the  given 
function  is  the  differential  coefficient,  we  have  recourse  to  the  result  that  the 
integral*  oi  f{x)  between  the  limits  a  and  h  is  the  area  bounded  by  the 
curve  y=f{x),  the  axis  of  x  and  the  ordinates  x  =  a,  x  =  h.  We  proceed  to 
frame  a  formal  definition  of  integration  with  this  idea  as  the  starting-point. 

4*1 1.      Upper  and  lower  integrals'^'. 

Let  f{x)  be  a  bounded  function  of  x  in  the  range  (a,  h).  Divide  the 
interval  at  the  points  x^,,  x^,  ...  x^-i  (a  ^ x^ ^x^^  . . .  ^x^-i^b).  Let  U,  L  be 
the  bounds  of  f{x)  in  the  range  (a,  6),  and  let  U^,  Lr  be  the  bounds  of  f(x) 
in  the  range  {x^-i,  x^),  where  Xq  =  a,  Xn  =  b. 

Consider  the  sums  J 

8n  =Ui{x^  —  a)+  U^(X2-X^)  +  ...  +  Un  (b  —  Xn-i), 
Sn  =  L^  (^1  —  a)  +  X2  (^2  -  ^i)  +  •  •  •  +  Ln  (b  —  Xn-i). 

Then  U (b -a)^  Sn>Sn> L  {b- a). 

For  a  given  n,  Sn  and  Sn  are  bounded  functions  of  x^,  x^,  ...  x^-i.  Let 
their  lower  and  upper  bounds  §  respectively  be  S^,  ««,  so  that  Sn,  Sn  depend 

*  Defined  as  the  (elementary)  function  whose  differential  coefficient  is/(^). 

t  The  following  procedure  for  establishing  existence  theorems  concerning  integrals  is  based 
on  that  given  in  Goursat's  Cours  (TAnalyse,  Chapter  iv.  The  concepts  of  upper  and  lower 
iutegrals  are  due  to  Darboux,  Annales  de  I' locale  norm.  mp.  ser.  2,  t.  iv. 

X  The  reader  will  find  a  figure  of  great  assistance  in  following  the  argument  of  this  section. 
/S„  and  «„  represent  the  sums  of  the  areas  of  a  number  of  rectangles  which  are  respectively 
greater  and  less  than  the  area  bounded  by  y~f{x),  x  =  a,  x  =  b  and  y  —  0,  if  this  area  be 
assumed  to  exist. 

§  The  bounds  of  a  function  of  Ji  variables  are  defined  in  just  the  same  manner  as  the  bounds 
of  a  function  of  a  single  variable  (§  3*62). 


62  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

only  on  n  and  on  the  form  of  f(x),  and  not  on  the  particular  way  of  dividing 
the  interval  into  n  parts. 

Let  the  lower  and  upper  bounds  of  these  functions  of  n  be  >S',  s.     Then 

Sfi  ^  S,       Sn  ^  S. 

We  proceed  to  shew  that  s  is  at  rnost  equal  to  8 ;  i.e.  8'^  s. 

Let  the  intervals  (a,  x^,  {x^,  x^,  ...  be  divided  into  smaller  intervals  by 
new  points  of  subdivision,  and  let 

a,  Vx,  2/2,  •••  Vk-x,  yk(=^i),  Vk+i,  •••  yi-i,  yi(=^2),  yi+i,  •••  ym-i,  h 

be  the  end  points  of  the  smaller  intervals;  let  Ur,  X/  be  the  bounds  of  f{x) 
in  the  interval  (y,—!,  yr)- 

m  m 

Let  Tyn^t  {yr  -  yr-i)  U,!,       tm^^  {yr  -  yr-i)  W . 

r=l  r=l 

Since  Ui  ,  U^',  ...  C/*'  do  not  exceed  t/j,  it  follows  without  difficulty  that 

^n  ^  -^  m  ^  ^m  ^  ^n  • 

Now  consider  the  subdivision  of  {a,  b)  into  intervals  by  the  points 
Xi,  X.2,  ...  Xn-1,  and  also  the  subdivision  by  a  different  set  of  points 
x/,  X2,  ...  x'n'-i-  Let  S'n',  s'n'  be  the  sums  for  the  second  kind  of  sub- 
division which  correspond  to  the  sums  aS^„,  s^  for  the  first  kind  of  subdivision. 
Take  all  the  points  Xi,  ...  ic„_i ;  x/,  ...  a'V-i  as  the  points  yi,  y^,  ...  ym- 

Then  8,^  ^  T,„  >tm>Sn, 

and  8\'  >T^>  Un  >  «'„'. 

Hence  every  expression  of  the  type  8,^  exceeds  (or  at  least  equals)  every 
expression  of  the  type  s'^ ;  and  therefore  8  cannot  be  less  than  s. 

[For  \{  8<s  and  s  —  8=27)  we  could  find  an  8^  and  an  s'„'  such  that 
8n-8<'r],  s  —  s'n'<'n  and  so  Sn'>8n,  which  is  impossible.] 

The  bound  8  is  called  the  upper  integral  off{x),  and  is  written  /  f{x)  dx ; 

J  a 

s  is  called  the  lower  integral,  and  written  1   f{x)  dx. 

J  a 

If  8  =  s,  their  common  value  is  called  the  integral  of  f{x)  taken  between 
the  limits*  of  integration  a  and  b. 

/■* 
The  integral  is  written  /    f{x)  dx. 

J  a 
ra  rb 

We  define     |   f{x)dx,  when  a<b,  to  mean  —  I   f{x)dx. 

J  b  J  a 


rb  rb  rb 

Example!.      \    {f{x)  +  ^{x)]dx=\    f(x)dx+  I    (f){x)dx. 

J  a  J  a  J  a 


Example  2.     By  means  of  example   1,  define  the  integral  of  a  continuous   complex 
function  of  a  real  variable. 

*  'Extreme  values'   would  be  a  more   appropriate  term  but  'limits'   has   the    sanction   of 
custom. 


4-12,  413]  THE  THEORY  OF   RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  08 

4*12.     Riemann's  condition  of  integr ability  *. 

A  function  is  said  to  be  '  integrable  in  the  sense  of  Riemann '  if  (with  the 
notation  of  §  4"11)  *S'„  and  s„  have  a  common  limit  (called  the  Riemann 
integral  of  the  function)  when  the  number  of  intervals  {xr^i,  Xj)  increases 
indefinitely  in  such  a  way  that  the  length  of  the  longest  of  them  tends  to 
zero. 

The  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  that  a  bounded  function  should  be 
mtegrahle  is  that  S^  —  s^  should  tend  to  zero  vjhen  the  number  of  intervals 
{Xr-iy  Xr)  increases  indefinitely  in  such  a  way  that  the  length  of  the  longest  tends 
to  zero. 

The  condition  is  obviously  necessary,  for  if  >S^^  and  «„  have  a  common  limit 
S^  —  s^^Osi^n-*-(X).  And  it  is  sufficient ;  for,  since  S^'^S'^s'^s^,  it  follows 
that  if  lim  {S^  —  s^)  =  0,  then 

lim  Sji  =  lim  s„  =  S  =  s. 

Note.  A  continuous  function  f{x)  is  'integrable.'  For,  given  e,  we  can  find  8  such 
that  \f{xf)—f{a/')\<fl{h-a)  whenever  \af-af'\<b.  Take  all  the  intei-vals  (^g_i,  Xg) 
less  than  8,  and  then  Ug- Lg<f/{b  —  a)  and  so  *S'„-s„<e  ;  therefore  Sn-Sn^^-O  under  the 
circumstances  specified  in  the  condition  of  integrability. 

Gorollari/.  If  Sn  and  s„  have  the  same  limit  S  for  one  mode  of  subdivision  of  (a,  b) 
into  intervals  of  the  specified  kind,  the  limits  of  Sn  and  of  5„  for  any  other  such  mode  of 
subdivision  are  both  ^S'. 

Example  1.     The  product  of  two  integrable  functions  is  an  integrable  function. 
Example  2.     A  function  which  is  continuous  except  at  a  finite  number  of  ordinaiy 
discontinuities  is  integrable. 

[If  f{x)  have  an  ordinary  discontinuity  at  c,  enclose  c  in  an  interval  of  length  Si; 
given  f,  we  can  find  S  so  that  \f{x')—f{x)  \  <e  when  x'  —  xl<8  and  x,  x'  are  not  in  this 
interval. 

Then  Sn-Sn^e{b-a  —  8i)+k8i,  where  k  is  the  greatest  value  of  \f{x')—f{x)\,  when 
X,  x'  lie  in  the  interval. 

When  8i^0,  ^^|/(c4-0)-/(c-0)  |,  and  hence  lim  (.S'„-s„)  =  0.] 

Example  3.  A  function  with  limited  total  fluctuation  and  a  finite  number  of  ordinary 
discontinuities  is  integrable.     (See  §  3'64  example  2.) 

4*13.     A  general  theorem  on  integration. 

Let  f{x)  be  integrable,  and  let  e  be  any  positive  number.  Then  it  is 
possible  to  choose  S  so  that 

n  rh  j 

t  (xp  -  Xp.,)f(x'p_i)  -  I   f{x)  dx\<  €, 

p=l  J  a 

provided  that  Xp  —  Xp^^  ^  B,     Xp_-^  ^  x'p^^  ^  Xp. 

*  Eiemann  (Ges.  Math.  Werke,  p.  239)  bases  his  definition  of  an  integral  on  the  limit  of  the 
sum  occurring  in  §  4*13;  but  it  is  then  difficult  to  prove  the  uniqueness  of  the  limit.  A  mote 
general  definition  of  integration  has  been  given  by  Lebesgue,  Annal'i  di  Mat.  Ser.  iii.  A,  t.  vii. 
See  also  his  Lemons  sur  Vintegration. 


64 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  IV 


Therefore 


To  prove  the  theorem  we  observe  that,  given  e,  we  can  choose  the  length 
of  the  longest  interval,  8,  so  small  that  >S^„  —  s„  <  e. 

n 

Also  'Sfn^  S  (a;p-Xp_,)f(x'p_,)^Sn, 

J  a 
n  1*6  ] 

t  (Xp  -  Xj,_i)f{x'p_,)  -      f{x)  dx\^Sr,-s^ 

p=\  J  a 

<  €. 

As  an  example*  of  the  evaluation  of  a  definite  integral  directly  from  the  theorem 
of  this  section  consider    I     r,  where  X<\. 

j  0   (1  -  ^2)4 

Take  8  =  -arcsinX  and  let  ^g=sinsS,  (0<s8<^7r),  so  that 
•^«  + 1  ~  ^»= 2  sin  ^S  cos  (s  + 1^)  8  <  8  ; 
also  let  jr/  =  sin  («  +  |)  S. 


Then 


2         "        " 


_  P    sin«8-8in(a-l)?8 


,=  1    (]  _^2^_j)i        8=1  COS(5-^)S 

=  2p  sin  \b 

=-arc  sin  Z.  {sin  ^S/(^8)}. 

By  taking  p  sufficiently  large  we  can  make 


arbitrarily  small. 

We  can  also  make 
arbitrarily  small. 

That  is,  given  an  arbitrary  number  €,  we  can  make 


Jo    (l-.r2)i~  «=i    (l_^'2^_j; 

.     „    fsiniS       ] 
arcsmZ.|^|--lj 


f^      dx 

U   (1  -  x^-. 


•arc  sin  X 


<( 


(1  -  ^2)4 

by  taking  p  sufficiently  large.  But  the  expression  now  under  consideration  does  not 
depend  on  p  ;  and  therefore  it  must  be  zero  ;  for  if  not  we  could  take  e  to  be  less  than  it, 
and  we  should  have  a  contradiction. 


That  is  to  say 
Example  1.     Shew  that 


'^      dx  .     „ 
,  =arc  sin  ^i. 

0   (l-a,-2)^ 


lim 


X  2x  (n  —  l)x 

1  +  cos  -  +  cos h  . . .  +  cos — 

n  n  n  &\nx 


Example  2.     If  f  {x)  has  ordinary  discontinuities  at  the  points  aj,  «2?  •■•  <^«)  then 
fb  (  fa,-S,         fa.i-S.,  fb  ] 

I    f{x)dx  =  Y\m\  +\  +...+  f(x)dxy  , 

J  a  [J  a  J  ai+ei  J  a^^+e^  ) 

where  the  limit  is  taken  by  making  Si,  82, ...  8k,  (i,  f^j  ■••  *«  tend  to  +0  independently. 
*  Netto,  Zeitschriftfilr  Math.  xl.  (1895). 


4'14]  THE   THEORY   OF   RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  66 

Example  3.     lif{x)  i»  integrable  when  ai^x^hi  and  if,  when  aj  ^ a  <  6<  ftj,  we  write 

/   f{x)dx'=<f){a,b), 
and  if/{b  +  0)  exists,  then 

lim    ii^Ll±^i«'l)=/(6  +  0). 


5^  +  0 

Deduce  that,  iff{x)  is  continuous  at  a  and  b, 

d_ 
da 


jjix)  dx=  -f{a\    ^  Jy  (^)  dx=f{b). 

Example  4.     Prove  by  differentiation  that,  if  </>  {x)  is  a  continuous  function  of  x  and 
-J-  a  continuous  function  of  t,  then 

J  xo  J  t„  at 


Example  5.     If  /'  {x)  and  0' (^)  are  continuous  when  a^x^b,  shew  from  example  3 
that 

f /' W  0  (-y)  c?^+  f  0'  (*')/(-^)  ^•=^=/(&)  <^  (h)  -f{a)  <l>  (a). 

y  a  J  a 

Example  6.     If /(:p)  is  integrable  in  the  range  (a,  c)  and  a  ^  6  ^  c,  shew  that  I   /(^)  ci?a' 
is  a  continuous  function  of  b. 

4'14.     Mean   Value  Theorems. 

The  two  following  general  theorems  are  frequently  useful. 

(I)     Let  U  and  L  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  of  the  integrable  function /(.r)  in  the 
range  (a,  b). 

Then  from  the  definition  of  an  integral  it  is  obvious  that 

r{U-f{x)}dx,     \\f{x)-L}dx 

J  a  J  a 

are  not  negative  ;  and  so 

U{b-a)^  l^f{x)dx^L{b-a). 

J  a 

This  is  known  as  the  First  Mean  Value  Theorem. 

lif{x)  is  continuoxis  we  can  find  a  number  ^  such  that  a^^^b  and  such  that/(^)  has 
any  given  value  lying  between  U  and  L  (§  3-63).     Therefore  we  can  find  |  such  that 


rf(x)dx  =  ib-a)f{i). 

J  a 


If  F(x)  has  a  continuous  differential  coefficient  F'  (x)  in  the  range  (a,  b),  we  have,  on 
writing  F'  (x)  for/(^), 

F{b)-F{a)^{h-a)F'{i) 
for  some  value  of  ^  such  that  a^^^b. 

-  Example,      li  f{x)  is  continuous  and  (^  (.*;)  >;0,  shew  that  |  can  be  found  such  that 

-h  fb 


j    f{x)4>{^)dx=^f{^)  I    4>(x)dx. 

J  a  J  a 


W.  M.  A. 


fi6  THE   PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP,  IT 

(II)  Let  f{x)  and  <^  {x)  be  integrable  in  the  range  (a,  h)  and  let  <^  {x)  be  a  positive 
decreasing  function  of  x.  Then  Bonnet's*  form  of  the  Second  Mean  Value  Theorem  is 
that  a  number  ^  exists  such  that  a^^^h,  and 

I    /  {^)  ^  (•*')  dx  =  (l){a)  j     f{x)  dx. 

J  a  J  a' 

For,  with  the  notation  of  §§  4'1-4'13,  consider  the  sum 

p 

S=    2    {Xs-X,_i)f{x,_i)(l){x,_i), 

«=1 
Writing  (;*;g-^g_i)/(^g_i)  =  ag_i,  (^(^g_i)  =  <^g_i,  ao  +  ai  +  ...  +  a,  =  6g,  we  have 

p-i 

s=l 

Each   term   in   the  summation   is  increased   by  writing   b  for   6g_i   and   decreased  by- 
writing  6  for  6g_i,  if  6,  6  be  the  greatest  and  least  of  6o?  ^i)  •••  ^p-i  >  ^"d  so  b(f>Q  ^S^b(f>Q. 

m 

Therefore  S  lies  between  the  greatest  and  least  of  the  sums  (p  (xq)   2  {Xg-Xg_i)f(xg^j) 

s=l 

where  m  =  1,  2,  3, ...  jo.     But  given  e  we  can  find  8  such  that  when  a'g  — .^'g_l  <  S 
2   (.rg-.^■g_l)/(^■g_l)  0  (^g_i)  -        /(.r)  4>  (x)  dx\<f, 

I  "l  /"aim  I 

I  »  =  1  J  Xo  \ 

and  so,  writing  a,  b  for  .t'o,  .v„,  we  find  that  I    /  (;^^)  ^  (.:r)  rfo;  lies  between  the  upper  and 

lower  bounds  oft  <^  («)  I     f{x)dx±2f,  where  ^j  may  take  all  values  between  a  and  6. 
y  o 

Let  fT'  and  Z  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  of  (f)  (a)  j     f  (x)  dx. 

J  a 
fb 

Then  U  +  2f'^j    f{x)(f>  (x)  dx'^L  —  2e  for  all  positive  values  of  e  ;  therefore 

J  a 

C^  j    f{x)(f>  (x)  dx ^  L. 

Since  (f>  (a)  j     f{x)  dx  qua  function  of  ^i  takes  all  values  between  its  upper  and  lower 

.     .  /-ft 

bounds,  there  is  some  value  ^,  say,  of  |i  for  which  it  is  equal  to  I    f{x)(f)  (x)  dx.     This 

J  a 
proves  the  Second  Mean  Value  Theorem. 

Kxample.  By  writing  I  (f){x)  —  (fi  (b)  \  in  place  of  <^  {x)  in  Bonnet's  form  of  the  mean 
value  theorem,  shew  that  if  ^  (x)  is  a  monotonic  function,  then  a  number  ^  exists 
such  that  a^^^b  and 

r  f{.v)  (P  (.r)  dx.=  cf,  (a)  I  \f{x)  dx  +  (p{b)  j    f{x)  dx. 

(Du  Bois  Reymond.) 

*  Lionville's  Journal,  Vol.  xiv.  (1849),  p.  249.  The  proof  given  is  a  slight  modification 
of  one  due  to  Holder. 

t  By  §  4-13  example  0.  since  /(.t)  is  bounded,   /  '^f(x)  dx  is  a  continuous  function  of  fi. 


4-2]  THE   THEORY   OF   RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  67 

4"2.     Differentiation  of  integrals  containing  a  parameter. 

The  equation*  -j-  \  f{x,  a)dx=  \    4~  ^  is  true  if  f{x,  a)  possesses  a 


bothf  the  variables  x  and  a. 

For  -J-  \  f  (x,  a)  dx  =  lim       •^-^— ^ 1 — '^ dx 

if  this  limit  exists.      But,  by  the  first  mean  value  theorem,  since  fa  is  a 
continuous   function   of  a,   the   second   integrand   is  fa  (x,    a  +  Oh),   where 

But,  for  any  given  e,  a  number  8  independent  of  x  exists  (since  the  con- 
tinuity of /a  is  uniform  J  with  respect  to  the  variable  x)  such  that 

I  fa  (x,  a')  -fa  (x,  a)  j  <  6/{b  -  a), 
whenever  \a.'  —  a\  <B. 

Taking  |  A  |  <  S  we  see  that  \6h\<  B,  and  so  whenever  \h\<B, 
I  l^f(x,a  +  h)-f(x,a)  ^^  _  p^^  ^^^  ^^  ^^  <  f  l/«  (^>  «  +  Oh)  -fa  (x,  a)  \  dx 

'  J  a  "'  J  a  J  a 

<  €. 

Therefore  by  the  definition  of  a  limit  of  a  function  (§  3"2), 

h^dJa  h 

exists  and  is  equal  to   I  fadx. 

J  a 
Example  1.     If  a,  6  be  not  constants  but  functions  of  a  with  continuous  differential 
coefl&cients,  shew  that 

Example  2.     If /(^,  a)  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables,  I    f{x,  a)  dx  is  a 

J  «■ 
continuous  function  of  a. 

*  This  formula  was  given  by  Leibniz,  without  specifying  the  restrictions  laid  on/(x,  o). 

t  <f>  (x,  y)  is  defined  to  be  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables  if,  given  e,  we  can  find 
5  such  that  |  <l>(x',  y')  -<f>(x,  y)  \<e  whenever  {(x' -x)^  +  {y' -y)^}^<d.  It  can  be  shewn  by  §  3-6 
that  if  </»  (x,  y)  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables  at  all  points  of  a  closed  region  in 
a  Cartesian  diagram,  it  is  uniformly  continuous  throughout  the  region  (the  proof  is  almost 
identical  with  that  of  §  3-61).  It  should  be  noticed  that,  if  <p  {x,  y)  is  a  continuous  function 
of  each  variable,  it  is  not  necessarily  a  continuous  function  of  both  ;  as  an  example  take 

this  is  a  continuous  function  of  x  and  of  y  at  (0,  0),  but  not  of  both  x  and  y. 

X  It  is  obvious  that  it  would  have  been  sufficient  to  assume  that  /^  had  a  Eiemann  integral 
and  was  a  continuous  function  of  a.  (the  continuity  being  uniform  with  respect  to  x),  instead 
of  assuming  that  /  was  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables.  This  is  actually  done  bj' 
Hobsou,  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable,  p.  599. 

5—2 


68  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

4'3.     Double  integrals  and  repeated  integrals. 

Let  f{x,  y)  be  a  function  which  is  continuous  with  regard  to  both  of  the 
variables  x  and  y,  when  a%  x^h,  a^y  ^^. 

By  §  4-2  example  2  it  is  clear  that 

a  VJ^^'  ^^  ^^\  ^^'    J    V  '^^'^'  ^^  ^\  ^^ 
both  exist.     These  are  called  repeated  integrals. 

Also,  as  in  §  3*62,  f{x,  y),  being  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables, 
attains  its  upper  and  lower  bounds. 

Consider  the  range  of  values  of  x  and  y  to  be  the  points  inside  and  on  a 
rectangle  in  a  Cartesian  diagram  ;  divide  it  into  nv  rectangles  by  lines  parallel 
to  the  axes. 

Let  Um,^^,  Lm,n  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  oi  f{x,  y)  in  one  of  the 
smaller  rectangles  whose  area  is,  say,  Am,ii',  and  let 

n        V  n        V 

m  =  l   ix  =  l  m=l   ;a  =  l 

Then  S^i^y  >Sn,v,  and,  as  in  §  4'11,  we  can  find  numbers  Sn,v,  Sn,v  which 
are  the  lower  and  upper  bounds  of  >S^^_„,  Sn,v  respectively,  the  values  of 
^n,v,  Sn,v  depending  only  on  the  number  of  the  rectangles  and  not  on  their 
shapes ;  and  S^^  „  ^  Sn,  v  We  then  find  the  lower  and  upper  bounds  {8  and  s) 
respectively  of  N^^^,  s„^^  qua  functions  of  n  and  v ;  and  Sn,v^  S^s'^  Sn^^,  as  in 
§  4-11. 

Also,  fi:"om  the  uniformity  of  the  continuity  oi  f{x,  y),  given  e,  we  can  find 
B  such  that 

'^  171,11.        -^m, /i  ■*^  f) 

(for  all  values  of  m  and  /x.)  whenever  the  sides  of  all  the  small  rectangles  are 
less  than  the  number  8  which  depends  only  on  the  form  of  the  function /(a;,  y) 
and  on  e. 

And  then  *S„_  ^  —  5n,  ^  <  eih  —  a){j3  —  a), 

and  so  S  —  s<e(h  —  a){^—  ol). 

But  S  and  s  are  independent  of  e,  and  so  S  =  s. 

The  common  value  of  S  and  s  is  called  the  double  integral  of  f{x,  y)  and 
is  written 

rb    fp 

f(x,  y)  (dxdy). 


It  is  easy  to  shew  that  the  repeated  integrals  and  the  double  integral  are  all  equal 
when  f{x,  y)  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables. 


4-3,  44]  THE  THEOEY  OF  BIBMANN   INTEGRATION  09 

For  let  Y,n>  Am  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  of 

aa  a;  varies  between  ar^.j  and  0?^. 

Then  2  Y„,(a7^-^^_,)  >  /    ]/    f{x,i/)d^\dx^2AmiXm-x,n-i)' 

m=l  J  a   U  "■  )  m=l 

V  V 

But*  2    Um,y.{yy.-yy.-i)'^Yr„^A.m'^     2    -^m.|x  (^m  "^M-l)- 

Multiplying  these  last  inequalities  by  Xm—Xm-u  using  the  preceding  inequalities  and 
summing,  we  get 

2      2   C/'^^^„,,M^  I     W    f{x,y)dy\dx'^^     2Z^,^^^^; 

m=l   (11=1  J  a  \J  <*■  )  m=l  (ut=l 

and  so,  proceeding  to  the  limit. 

But  S=s=        /    f{x,y){dxdy\ 

J  a  J  a- 

and  so  one  of  the  repeated  integrals  is  equal  to  the  double  integral.     Similarly  the  other 
repeated  integral  is  equal  to  the  double  integral. 

Corollary.     lif{x,  y)  be  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables, 

J    dx\\        f{x,y)dyj  =  j    dyU^      f{x,y)dx\. 

4'4.     Infinite  integrals. 

If    lim   [  I  f{x)da;\  exists,  we  denote  it  by  /    f{x)dx;  and  the  limit  in 
question  is  called  an  infinite  integral'^. 
Examples. 

(3)     By  integrating  by  parts,  shew  that  /     P^e~^ dt  =  n  !.  (Euler.) 

fb  fb 

Similarly  we  define  /       /(x)  dx  to  mean     lim       /    /  (.r)  dx,  if  this  limit  exists  ;  and 

J  ~^  a-^  —  cD    J  a 

I      f{x)dx  is  defined  as    I      f(x)dx+j     f(x)dx.     In  this  last   definition  the   choice 
of  a  is  a  matter  of  indifference. 

*  The  upper  bound  of  f  {x,  y)  in  the  rectangle  A^^^^  is  not  less  than  the  upper  bound 
of  f(x,  y)  on  that  portion  of  the  line  x=f  which  Hes  in  the  rectangle. 

t  This  phrase,  due  to  Hardy  (Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  xxxiv.  p.  16),  suggests  the 
analogy  between  an  infinite  integral  and  an  infinite  series. 


70 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  IV 

4'41.      Infinite  integrals   of  continuous  functions.      Conditions  for   con- 
vergence. 

A  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  for  the  convergence  of  1    f{oc)  dx  is 

J  a 

that,  corresponding  to  any  positive  number  e,  a  positive  number  X  should 
exist  such  that      I    f{x)dx\<e  whenever 

J  x'  \ 

x'^x'^X. 
The  condition  is  obviously  necessary ;  to  prove  that  it  is  sufficient,  suppose 

ra+n 

it  is  satisfied ;  then,  if  n'^X  —  a  and  w  be  a  positive  integer  and  8^  =  I       /(^)» 

J  a 

we  have  |  S^+p  -  ^^  |  <  e. 

Hence,  by  §  2'22,  S^  tends  to  a  limit,  S ;  and  then,  if  ^  >  a  +  w, 

S  -      f{x)  dx    ^    S-  \       f{x)  dx   +    I       fix)  dx 

■'a  J  a  J  a+n 

<2e; 
and  so    lim   /   f(x)  dx  =  S;  so  that  the  condition  is  sufficient. 

f -*.oo  J  a 

4*42.     Uniformity  of  convergence  of  an  infinite  integral. 

The  integral  /    f{x,  a)  dx  is  said  to  converge  uniformly  with  regard  to  a 

J  a 

in  a  given  domain  of  values  of  a  if,  corresponding  to  an  arbitrary  positive 
number  e,  there  exists  a  number  X  independent  of  a  such  that 


L 


<  € 


f(x,  a)  dx 

for  all  values  of  a  in  the  domain  and  all  values  of  x'  ^  X. 

The  reader  will  see  without  difficulty  on  comparing  §§  2*22  and  3*31  with 
§  4"41  that  a  necessary  and  sufficient  condition  that    I    f(x,  a.)dx   should 

J  a 

converge  uniformly  in  a  given  domain  is  that,  corresponding  to  any  positive 
number  e,  there  exists  a  number  X  independent  of  a  such  that 


f 


f  {x,  OL)dx\<  e 


for  all  values  of  a  in  the  domain  whenever  x"  >  a;'  ^  X. 

4'43.     Tests  for  the  convergence  of  an  infinite  integral. 

There  are  conditions  for  the  convergence  of  an  infinite  integral  analogous 
to  those  given  in  Chapter  ii  for  the  convergence  of  an  infinite  series. 

The  following  tests  are  of  special  importance. 


4-41-4-43]  THE   THEORY   OF  RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  7l 

(I)  Absolutely  convergent  integrals.     It  may  be  shewn  that  I    f{x)  dx 

J  a 

certainly  converges  if  1     |  f{x)  \  dx  does  so ;  and  the  former  integral  is  then 

J  a 

said  to  be  absolutely  convergent.     The  proof  is  similar  to  that  of  §  2-32. 

/■«. 
Example.     The   comparison   test.     If  \f{x)\^g{x)  and  i     g{x)dx  converges,   then 

r  " 

/    f{x)dx  converges  absolutely. 

[Note.     It  was  observed  by  Dirichlet*  that  it  is  not  necessary  for  the  convergence  of 
I    f{x)dx  that  f{x)-*-0  as  x-»-od  :  the  reader  may  see  this  by  considering  the  function 

f{x)=0  (n'^x^n+l-in  +  l)-^), 

f(x)  =  {n  +  iy{n  +  l-x){x-(n  +  l)  +  {n  +  l)-^}  (n  +  l-{n  +  \)-^^x^n  +  l), 

where  n  takes  all  integral  values. 

ft  fn+l 

For    I   f(x)dx  increases  with  ^  and    /        f{x)dx=^{n+l)~^;  whence  it  follows 
Jo  J  n 

without  difficulty  that   I     / (x)  dx  converges.     But  when  x  =  n  +  l  —^  {n+l)~^,  f{x)  =  ^  : 

J  a 
and  aof{x)  does  not  tend  to  zero.] 

(II)  The  Maclaurin-Cauchyf  test.     If  f(x)>0  and  f(x)^0  steadily, 
I    f(x)  dx  and  S  f{n)  converge  or  diverge  together. 

Jl  M=l  ^ 

/"m  +  l 

For  f{m)^  f{x)dx^f{m  +  l), 

J  m 
n  fn+l  M+l 

and  so  2  f{m)^  j       f{x)dx^    2    f{m). 

m=l  J  1  m=2  ' 

The  first   inequality   shews   that,   if  the   series   converges,  the  increasing  sequence 

fn+l 

I         f{x)dx  converges  (§  2'2)  when  7i-*^ao  through  integral  values,  and  hence  it  follows 

fx' 

without  difficulty  that  I    f{x)dx  converges  when  ^-'^x  ;  also  if  the  integral  diverges, 

.'  1 
so  does  the  series. 

The  second  shews  that  if  the  series  diverges  so  does  the  integral,  and  if  the  integral 
converges  so  does  the  series  (§  2"2). 

(III)  Bertrand's\  test.     If  f{x)  =  0  (x^"^),  1    f{x)dx   converges   when 

J  a 

\  <  0 ;  and  '\ff{x)  =  0  (a'~*  [log  xY~^),  I    f{x)  dx  converges  when  X  <  0. 

J  a 

These  results  are  particular  cases  of  the  comparison  test  given  in  (I). 

*  Crelle,  Bd.  xvii. 

t  Maclaurin  {Fluxions,  Vol.  i.  pp.  289,  290)  makes  a  verbal  statement  practically  equivalent 
to  this  result.     Cauchy's  result  is  given  in  his  Collected  Works,  ser.  ii.  t.  vii.  p.  269. 
:J:  Liouville^s  Journal,  t.  vii.  pp.  38,  39. 


72  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

(IV)     Ghartiers  test*  for  integrals  involving  periodic  functions. 

is  bounded  as  x^  <x  , 


If  f{x)  -*  0  steadily  as  a;  -*  oo  and  if     I    </>  {oc)  dx 

J  a 

then  I    f{x)  ^  (x)  dx  is  convergent. 
J  a 

For  if  the  upper  bound  of     /     (j)  {x)  dx    he  A,  we  can  choose  X  such  that/(;c)  <e/2^ 

J  a 

when  .r  ^  X ;  and  then  by  the  second  mean  vahie  theorem,  when  x"  ^x''^X,  we  have 
r  f{x)(t>(x)dx\=  fix')  j    (}){x)dx    =f{x')  I  r(f>{x)dx-  r  (t>{x)dx\  ^2Af(x')<f, 

\  J  X'  I  J  X'  \  j  a  J  a  I  ■ 

which  is  the  condition  for  convergence. 

Example  1.      /      dx  converges. 

Jo       *' 

/•oc 

Example  2.      I     x~^ sin  {x^  —  ax)  dx  converges. 

J  0 

4"431.     Tests  for  uniformity  of  convergence  of  an  infinite  integral  f . 
(I)     Be  la  Vallee  Poussin's  testl.     The  reader  will  easily  see  by  using 

the  reasoning  of  §  3'34  that  I    f{x,  a)  dx  converges  uniformly  with  regard 

to  a  in  a  domain  of  values  of  a  if  { f(w,  a)\<  fi  {x),  where  yu,  {x)  is  independent 

of  a  and        fx  (x)  dx  converges.     [For,  choosing  X  so  that   I     fi,{x)dx<  e 

when  a?"  ^  ic' ^  A'',  we  have     I    f(x,  a)dx    <  e,  and  the  choice  of  X  is  inde- 

J  of 

pendent  of  a.] 

Example.      I     o(f—'^e~'^dx   converges   uniformly   in   any   interval   (4,    B)   such 
.'  0 


that 


\<A<B. 


(II)     The  method  of  change  of  variable. 
This  may  be  illustrated  by  an  example. 


Consider 
We  have 
Since 


/""  sin.o 


dx  where  a  is  real. 


J  x'     X  J  ax'     y 


sm  y 


So 


./o      y 
sin  ax 


dy  converges  we  can  find  I' such  that 


— --  dy  \<e  when y^y ^  Y. 

V'    y       \ 


dx  '•  <  e  whenever  j  a.r'  |  ^  F ;  if  |  a  |  ^  S  >  0,  we  therefore  get 


p"  s 


dx  \  <i 


*  Liouvillcst  Journal,  t.  xviri.  (1853).  It  is  remarkable  that  this  test  for  conditionally 
convergent  integrals  should  have  been  given  some  years  before  formal  definitions  of  absolutely 
convergent  integrals. 

t  The  results  of  this  section  and  of  §  4-44  are  due  to  de  la  Vallee  Poussiu,  Ann.  de  la  Sac. 
Scientifiqiie  de  Bru.velles,  t.  xvi.  pp.  150-180. 

X  This  name  is  due  to  Osgood. 


4-431,  4-44] 


THE   THEORY   OF  RIEMANN    INTEGRATION 


78 


when  y  ^  a/  ^  jr=  Yjb  ;  and  this  choice  of  X  is  indei^endent  of  a.     So  the  convergence  is 
uniform  when  a  ^  8  >  0  and  when  a  ^  -  S  <  0. 

Example.     \      \\     sin  {^'^x^)  d^\  dx'  is  uniformly  convergent  in  any  range  of  real 

(de  la  Valine  Poussin.) 


values  of  a 


/: 


"or* 


'~hs\mdz 


does  not  exceed  a  constant  inde- 


[ Write  ff^x^=Zf  and  observe  that 

pendent  of  a  and  x  since  /     z-i  sin  z  dz  converges.] 
Jo 

(III)  The  method  of  integration  by  parts. 

If  /  f{x,  a) dx=<f>  (x,  a)-]-  j  X  (^>  «) ^•^ 

and  if  <^  (:r,  a)  -*•  0  uniformly  as  .y-*  qo  and  I     ;^  (^,a)  c?^  converges  uniformly  with  regard 

.'  a 

to  a,  then  obviously  /    f(x,  a)  dx  converges  uniformly  with  regard  to  a. 
J  a 

(IV)  The  method  of  decomposition. 

Example.        f  °°  cos^-sin  a..^^^^  p  sin(a  +  l)  x-^^_^^  ^  sin  (a- 1)  ^^^  . 

J  0  X  J  0  ^  Jo  X 

both  of  the  latter  integrals  converge  uniformly  in  any  closed  domain  of  real  values  of 
a  from  which  the  points  a  =  + 1  are  excluded. 

4'44.     Theorems  concerning  uniformly  convergent  infinite  integrals. 

/•« 
(I)     Let  I    f(x,  a)  dx  converge  uniformly  when  a  lies  in  a  domain  S. 

J  a 

Then,  if  f{x,  a)  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables  when  x'^a  and 
a  lies  in  S,  I    fix,  a)  dx  is  a  continuous  function*  of  a. 

J  a 

For,  given  e,  we  can  find  X  independent  of  a,  such  that         f{x,0L)dx\<e 
whenever  ^^  X. 

Also  we  can  find  S  independent  of  x  and  a,  such  that 

\f(x,a)-f(x,a')\<el{X-a) 
whenever  j  a  —  a'  <  8. 

That  is  to  say,  given  e,  we  can  find  B  independent  of  a,  sucK  that 
I    f{x,  a')  dx  —  I    f(x,  a)  dx   1^  \       {f(x,  a)  —f(x,  a')}  dx 

•la  J  a  :        ]  J  a 


+  ,  I    f(x,  a.')dx   +    I    f{x,  a)dx 

I  J  X  •  J  X 


<3e, 
whenever  |  a'  —  a  j  <  S ;  and  this  is  the  condition  for  continuity. 


*  This  result  is  due  to  Stokes.     His  statement  is  that  the  integral  is  a  continuous  function 
of  a  if  it  does  not  '  converge  infinitely  slowly.' 


74  THE  PEOCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

(II)     If  fix,  a)  satisfies  the  same  conditions  as  in  (I),  and  if  a  lies  in  S 
when  A  ^a^  B,  then 


Therefore 


I     4  I    f{x,  a)  dxi  da  =  i    \  j    f  {x,  a)cZa^  dx. 
For,  by  §  4-3, 

I     \  I  f{x,  (x)dx\  da=  i    11   f(x,  a)dal  dx. 

I     \j    f(x,  a)dxl  dcL—  I    \j    f(x,a)da[dx 
—  \  I     \  j    fi^y  ci)dxl  da 
<       eda  <  e(B-A), 

J  A 

for  all  sufficiently  large  values  of  ^. 

But,  from  5S  2*1  and  4'41,  this  is  the  condition  that 


should  exist,  and  be  equal  to 


lim   I    \  I    f  (x,  a)  day  dx 

■.^aoJa  [J  A  ) 


I     \  I    f{x,  a)dx\da. 
Corollary.     The  equation  -j-  \     (^{x,  a)dx=  \      ^—  dx  is  true  if  the  integral  on  the 

da  J  a  J  a     <J(^ 

right  converges  uniformly  and  the  integrand  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables, 
when  x'^a  and  a  lies  in  a  domain  S,  and  if  the  integral  on  the  left  is  convergent. 

Let  J  be  a  point  of  >S^,  and  let  ^=f{x,  a),  so  that,  by  §  4-13  example  3, 

va 

j    fix,  a)da  =  (l>  (x,  a) -(f)  (x,  A). 

JA 

Then    I     i      /  (a;,  a)  c?a >  o?^  converges,  that  is    I     {(f)  (x,  a)  -  (f)  {x,  A)}  dx  convergea, 
and  therefore,  since  /     (f)  (x,  a)  dx  converges,  so  does  i     (f)(x,  A)  dx. 

J  a  J  a 

Then  T     /     ^  (■^j  ")  ^■^'  r=  ^     /     ^^  ('^' ")  ~ *^  (^'  ^)}  <^'^ 

=  [    f{x,a)dx=\      ^dx, 
which  is  the  required  result ;  the  change  of  the  order  of  the  integrations  has  been  justified 
above,  and  the  differentiation  of  /  "  with  regard  to  a  is  justified  by  §  4-44  (I)  and  §  4-13 
example  3. 


45,  4-51]  THE  THEORY   OP  RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  75 

4'5.     Improper  integrals.     Principal  values. 

rb 

If  l/(^)|-*  <»  as  a;-^a  +  0,  then     lim  f{x)dx  may  exist,   and   is 

written  simply  /  f{x)  dx ;  this  limit  is  called  an  improper  integral. 

J  a 

If  I  f(x) I  -*  00  as  x-^c,  where  a  <c  <b,  then 

fc-s  rb 

lim    /      f{x)dx+  lim    I       f{x)dx 

may  exist;  this  is  also  written    /  f(x)dx,  and  is  also  called  an  improper 

-'  a 

integral ;  it  might  however  happen  that  neither  of  these  limits  exists  when 
B,  S'  -^-O  independently,  but 

lim   \  I      f(x)  dx  +  I       f(x)  dx\ 

6-*.+0    Ua  J  c+S  ) 

exists;  this  is  called  * Cauchy's  principal  value  of  /  f(x)dx'  and  is  written 
for  brevity  P  I  f{x)dx. 

J  a 

Results  similar  to  those  of  §§  4*4-4"44  may  be  obtained  for  improper 
integrals.  But  all  that  is  required  in  practice  is  (i)  the  idea  of  absolute 
convergence,  (ii)  the  analogue  of  Bertrand's  test  for  convergence,  (iii)  the 
analogue  of  de  la  Valine  Poussin's  test  for  uniformity  of  convergence.  The 
construction  of  these  is  left  to  the  reader,  as  is  also  the  consideration 
of  integrals  in  which  the  integrand  has  an  infinite  limit  at  more  than  one 
point  of  the  range  of  integration*. 

Examples.     (1)      I    ;p~"' cos  ;r  o?a:  is  an  improper  integral. 
J  0 

(2)  I     .t?^""-"  (1  -  ^)'*~^  dx  is  an  improper  integral  if  0<X<1,  0<fi<l. 
J  0 

It  does  not  converge  for  negative  values  of  X  and  /x. 

(3)  P  I     dx  is  the  principal  value  of  an.  improper  integral  when 

J  Q  1—x 

0<a<l. 

4'51.     The  inversion  of  the  order  of  integration  of  a  certain  repeated  integral. 

General  conditions  for  the  legitimacy  of  inverting  the  order  of  integration  when  the 
integrand  is  not  continuous  are  difficult  to  obtain. 

The  following  is  a  good  example  of  the  difficulties  to  be  overcome  in  inverting  the 
order  of  integration  in  a  repeated  improper  integral. 

*  For  a  detailed  discussion  of  improper  integrals,  the  reader  is  referred  either  to  Hobson's  or 
to  Pierpont's  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable.  The  connexion  between  infinite  integrals  and 
improper  integrals  is  exhibited  by  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series,  §  164. 


Now 


76  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

Let  f{x,  y)  he  a  continuoiis  functioti  of  both  variables,  and  let  0<X^1,  0</i^l, 
0  <  j/^1  ;  then 

/o  '^"^  ill"  ^'"'y""'  (1  -^-y)''"V(^,  y)  dy] 

=  \yy{\'~'  x^~^y''-Hi-^-yr^f{x,y)dxY 

This  integral,  which  was  first  employed  by  Dirichlet,  is  of  importance  in  the  theory  of 
integral  equations  ;  the  investigation  which  we  shall  give  is  due  to  Hurwitz*. 

Let  x^~^f-~^  (1  -x-yy~'^f{x,  y)  =  (j)  (x,  y)  ;  and  let  M be  the  upper  bound  of  \f{x,  y)  \ . 
Let  8  be  any  positive  number  less  than  J. 

Draw  the  triangle  whose  sides  are  x  =  8,  y  —  8,  x+y=l  —  8;  at  all  points  on  and  inside 
this  triangle  0  (x,  y)  is  continuous,  and  hence,  by  §  4'3  corollary, 

n-25        c  n.—x—s  )        fi—as        (  fi—y—s  1 

/■1-25       (  n-x  1       n-as       c  fi-x-s  ■)       r\-2S  fi-iS 

J&  [Jo      "f'^'^'^^^^j^  js       '^^{js         ^(^'^)^i'| +J5       Iidx+\        l^x, 

fs  n-x 

where  1^=  \    ^{x,y)dy,     h^  \  ^{x,y)dy. 

Jo  J  i-a-S 

But  I  A  I  <  f  *  Jifx^-^y^-"^  (1  -  x-T/)"-^  dy 

Jo 

<  i/"^-'  (1  -  ^  -  8)"-'  r  y^-'  dy, 
since  (1  _.^_y)''-i^(l  _^_ §)"-!, 

Therefore,  writing  x={\-8)xx,  we  havet 

/         hdx    ^M8f^fi-n        x^-\l~x-8Y-^dx 

^  i/r  ^-1  (1  -  8)^+"-'  r  xi"-'  (l-xi)"-'  dx 

J  0 

The  reader  will  prove  similarly  that  /2-*-0  as  S-*>0. 

Hencel         \  ^'^^  A        ^  (•^''  ^)  M  =  ^^"^  /^   '  ^'^'  |  /        ^  ^^^  3/)  '^yj 

n-'iS  (  fi-y-S  ] 

=  hm  /         ^y  \  L         ^  (**''  ^)  ^*j  ' 
*  Annals  of  Mathematics,  Vol.  ix  (1908),  p.  183. 

t    I     xi^'l  (1  -  xi)"-'^  dxi  =  B(\,  v)  exists  if  \  >  0,  >/  >  0  (§  4-5  example  2). 
J  The  repeated  integral  exists,  and  is,  in  fact,  absolutely  convergent ;  for 

j     "^  \  x^-'^  y'^-'^  (1-  X  -y)''-\f{.r,  y)  dy  \<M.x''-'^  (1  -  xf-^"-'^  j    s'^-'^  (1  ^s^'^ds, 

writing  ?/  =  (l-a;)s  ;  and  I     Mx^~^  {l--x)'^^''~^dx  .  i     s'*~^  (l-s)""-^  ds  exists.     And  since  the 
Jo  ^  Jo  r 

fl-e  fl-2S 

integral  exists,  its  value  which  is   lim     /         may  be  written  lim    | 

5,  e-»0  J  5  S-*0  J  S 


46]  THE  THEORY   OF  RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  T7 

by  what  has  been  already  proved ;  but,  by  a  precisely  similar  piece  of  work,  the  last 
integral  is 

We  have  consequently  proved  the  theorem  in  question. 

Corollary.  Writing  ^  =  a  +  (6-a)^,  rj  =  h  —  {h-a)y,\vie  see  that,  if  0  (|,  i;)  is  con- 
tinuous, 

/„'  ^^  1  i]  ^^  ~  ''^'"'  ^^  "  "'^'^  ^''  ~  ^^"'^  "^  ^^'  ''^  "^4 

This  is  called  Dirichlet's  formula. 

[Note.  What  are  now  called  infinite  and  improper  integrals  were  defined  by  Cauchy, 
Lecons  sur  le  calc.  inf.  1823,  though  the  idea  of  infinite  integrals  seems  to  date  from 
Maclaurin  (1742).  The  test  for  convergence  was  employed  by  Chartier  (1853).  Stokes 
(1847)  distinguished  between  'essentially'  (absolutely)  and  non-essentially  convergent 
integrals  though  he  did  not  give  a  formal  definition.  Such  a  definition  was  given  by 
Dirichlet  in  1854  and  1858  (see  his  Vorlesungen,  1904,  p.  39).  In  the  early  part  of  the 
nineteenth  century  improper  integrals  received  more  attention  than  infinite  integrals, 
probably  because  it  was  not  fully  realised  that  an  infinite  integral  is  really  the  limit 
of  an  integral.] 

4*6.     Complex  integration*. 

Integration  with  regard  to  a  real  variable  x  may  be  regarded  as  integration 
along  a  particular  path  (namely  part  of  the  real  axis)  in  the  Argand  diagram. 
Let  f{z),  (=  P  +  iQ),  be  a  function  of  a  complex  variable  z,  which  is  continuous 
along  a  simple  curve  AB  m  the  Argand  diagram. 

Let  the  equations  of  the  curve  be 

x  =  X  (t),     y  =  y  (t)         (a^t^  b). 

Let  X  (a)  +  iy  (a)  =  z^,     x  (6)  +  iy  (b)  =  Z. 

Then  iff  oc  (t),  y(t)  have  continuous  differential  coefficients^  we  define 

f{z)  dz  taken  along  the  simple  curve  AB  to  mean 


\>-Ht--i) 


-\-i-~]  dt. 


The  'length'  of  the  curve  ^5  will  be  defined  as  r^('^Y+  (^X dt. 


doc     du 
It  obviously  exists  if    j7>   ;^  are  continuous;   we  have  thus  reduced  the 

discussion  of  a  complex  integral  to  the  discussion  of  four  real  integrals,  viz. 

/>!-■  />!-.  M-.  />!- 

*  A  treatment  of  complex  integration  based  on  a  different  set  of  ideas  and  not  making 
so  many  assumptions  concerning  the  curve  AB  will  be  found  in  Watson's  Complex  Integration 
and  Cauchy^s  Theorem. 

t  This  assumption  will  be  made  throughout  the  subsequent  work. 

X  Cp.  §  4-13  example  4. 


78  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

By  §  4*13  example  4,  this  definition  is  consistent  with  the  definition  of  an 
integral  when  AB  happens  to  be  part  of  the  real  axis. 

Examples,      j     f{z)dz=  —  j     f{z)  dz,  the  paths  of  integration  being  the  same  (but  in 

J  Zo  J  Z 

opposite  directions)  in  each  integral. 

\jz=Z-z,.      /^«^^=/^'fS-2'|  +  ^-(-'J+y§)}^^ 


=  l^^-^y^+i^'y 


4'61.  The  fundamental  theorem  of  complex  integration. 
From  §  4*13,  the  reader  will  easily  deduce  the  following  theorem : 
Let  a  sequence  of  points  be  taken  on  a  simple  curve  z^Z;  and  let  the  first 
n  of  them,  rearranged  in  order  of  magnitude  of  their  parameters,  be  called 
^■i*"',  2^2 w,  . . .  ^„(«>  (^o^  =  z^,  2'„+i<'*'  =  Z) ;  let  their  parameters  be  ^i<"',  ^.2<">, . . .  t^*"', 
and  let  the  sequence  be  such  that,  given  any  number  8,  we  can  find  N  such 
that,  when  n>N,  ^r+i"*'  -^r'"'  <  K^ov  r  =  0,  1,  2, ... ,  ri ;  let  ^r**"'  be  any  point 
whose  parameter  lies  between  i;.'"',  ifr+i"** ;  then  we  can  make 

r  =  0  -l  Za 

arbitrarily  small  by  taking  n  sufficiently  large. 

4'62.     An  upper  limit  to  the  value  of  a  complex  integral. 
Let  M  be  the  upper  bound  of  the  continuous  function  \f{z)\. 

Then  !f;/(.)rf.|«f;|/Wlj(^  +  i|)|rf( 

^Ml, 
where  I  is  the  '  length  '  of  the  curve  z^Z. 

I  r^         I 

That  is  to  say,     I    f{z)dz\  cannot  exceed  Ml. 

4"7.     Integration  of  infinite  series. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  if  *S^ {z)  =  u-^  {z)  +  Wa {z)  +  ...  is  a  uniformly  con- 
vergent series  of  continuous  functions  of  z,  for  values  of  z  contained  within 
some  region,  then  the  series 

I   u-^  {z)  dz  +  I   Uo  {z)dz  +  ..., 
'  c  J  c 

(where  all  the  integrals  are  taken  along  some  path  G  in  the  region)  is  con- 
vergent, and  has  for  sura   I   aS'(^)  dz. 


R^  {z)  dz 
c 


4-61-4'7]  THE   THEORY   OF   RIEMANN   INTEGRATION  79 

For,  writing 

*Sf  {z)  =  Ml  {z)  +  M2  (^)  +  . . .  +  M„  {z)  +  Rn  {z), 

we  have 

1  S{z)dz=\  Ui{z)dz+  ...  +     Un (z)  dz+  I   Rn  (z)  dz. 

Jo  J  c  -'  c  J c 

Now  since  the  series  is  uniformly  convergent,  to  every  positive  number  e 
there  corresponds  a  number  r  independent  of  z,  such  that  when  n^r  we  have 
\Rn{z)\<€,  for  all  values  of  z  in  the  region  considered. 

Therefore  if  I  be  the  length  of  the  path  of  integration,  we  have  (§  4*62) 

Therefore    the    modulus    of    the    difference    between     /    S  (z)  dz    and 

J  c 

S    /  Urn  (z)  dz  can  be  made  less  than  any  positive  number,  by  giving  n  any 
m=i  J  c 

sufficiently  large  value.     This  proves  both  that  the  series    1    i  u^  {z)  dz  is 

m=l  J  c 

convergent,  and  that  its  sum  is    I    8{z)dz. 

J  c 

Corollary.     As  in  §  4*44  corollary,  it  may  be  shewn  that* 

0?    °°        ,  ,       '^     d       ,  . 

u/Z  n=0  n=o  '*■' 

if  the  series  on  the  right  converges  uniformly  and  the  series  on  the  left  is  convergent. 

Example  1.     Consider  the  Series 

""       2x  {n  (n  + 1)  Hiu^ sc^  —  1}  cos  x^ 
„li  {1+^2 sin2 x^}{l  +  (n+lf  sin2 x^} ' 
in  which  x  is  real. 

The  nth  term  is 

2a:ncosa;2         2x{n  +  l)Gosx'^ 


1  +  n^sin^  x^      1 +(rj.  +  l)2  sin^^^' 
and  the  sum  of  n  terms  is  therefore 

2x  cos  x^        2x  (n  +  l)  cos  x^ 
l  +  sin^ar^      l  +  {n  +  iysm''x^' 

Hence  the   series   is   absolutely  convergent  for  all   real  values  of  x  except  ±  sJ{miT) 
where  m=l,  2, ...  ;  but 

„  2x{n-\-\)  cos  x"^ 

"  ^^'  ^  H-(«  +  l)2sin2.r2 ' 

and  if  n  be  any  integer,  by  taking  x  =  {n -^-1)"'^  this  has  the  limit  2  as  w^-  00  .     The  series  is 
therefore  non-uniformly  convergent  near  ^  =  0. 

*  — ;— means  lim  -^^ / —  where  h-*-0  aloncr  a  definite  simple  curve;  this  definition 

is  modified  slightly  in  §  5-12  in  the  case  when  f  {z)  is  an  analytic  function. 


80  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IV 

2 /y*  cos  7 
Now  the  sum  to  infinity  of  the  series  is  ^  ^     ,  and  so  the  integral  from  0  to  a;  of 

the  sum  of  the  series  is  arc  tan  (sin  x'').     On  the  other  hand,  the  sum  of  the  integrals  from 
0  to  X  of  the  first  n  terms  of  the  series  is 


arc  tan  (sin  x"^)  —  arc  tan  (%+ 1  sin  x"^), 
and  as  «  -»  00  this  tends  to 

arc  tan  (sin  x^)  —  -^. 

Therefore  the  integral  of  the  sum  of  the  series  differs  from  the  sum  of  the  integrals  of 
the  terms  by  \tt. 

Example  2.     Discuss,  in  a  similar  manner,  the  series 


=1  «  (m  + 1)  (1  +  e"^2)  (1  +  e"  + 1 A-2) 
for  real  values  of  x. 

Example  3.     Discuss  the  series 

M1  +  M2  +  W3+--M 

where 

Ml  =  26"^",     Un=nze~'^"—  {n  -  1)  ze-("-i)*^, 
for  real  values  of  z. 

The  sum  of  the  first  n  terms  is  nze~^^ ,  so  the  sum  to  infinity  is  0  for  all  real  values 
of  z.  Since  the  terms  «„  are  real  and  ultimately  all  of  the  same  sign,  the  convergence 
is  absolute. 


In  the  series 


I   Uidz+  I   U2dz+ I    u^dz-'r..., 
Jo  Jo  Jo 


the  sum  of  7i  terms  is  -1(1  —  e"*"'),  and  this  tends  to  the  limit  |  as  n  tends  to  infinity ;  this 
is  not  equal  to  the  integral  from  0  to  2  of  the  sum  of  the  series  2m„. 

The  explanation  of  this  discrepancy  is  to  be  found  in  the  non-uniformity  of  the 
convergence  near  2  =  0,  for  the  remainder  after  n  terms  in  the  series  U1  +  U2  +  ...is  —  nze~^  ; 
and  by  taking  z=n~^  we  can  make  this  equal  to  e"V»,  which  is  not  arbitrarily  small;  the 
series  is  therefore  non-uniformly  convergent  near  2  =  0. 

Example  4.     Compare  the  values  of 

I    \  "2,  uA  dz     and      2    I    ?«„  dz, 
J  0   {n=\      J  ft=l  J  0 

where 

2^22  2(W  +  1)22 


"     {l+'A:^z^)\og{n  +  l)      {l-|-(%  +  l)2s2}log(;i  +  2)" 

(Trinity,  1903.) 

REFERENCES. 

G.  F.  B.  RiEMANN,  Ges.  Math.    Werke,  pp.  239-241. 

G.  Lejbune-Dirichlet,    Vorlesungen.     (Brunswick,  1904.) 

F.  G.  Meyer,  Bestimmte  Integrale.     (Leipzig,  1871.) 

E.  GouRSAT,  Cours  d" Analyse,  Chapters  iv,  xiv. 

C.  J.  DE  LA  Vall^e  Poussin,  Cour.<i  d' Analyse  Infinitesimale,  Chapter  vi. 

E.  W.  HoBSON,  Functions  of  a  Real   Variable,  Chapter  v. 

T.  J.  I'a.  Bromwich,   Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  Aj^pendix  iii. 


the  theory  of  riemann  integration  81 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that  the  integrals 

/     sin  {x^)  dx,     I  cos  (x^)  dx,      I     x  exp  ( -r  x*^  sin^  x)  dx 
Jo                         Jo  Jo 

converge.  (Dirichlet  and  Du  Bois  Reymond.) 

2.  If  a  be  real,  the  integral 


cos (ax)    , 

'  '  dx 

.  0     1+^- 
is  a  continuous  function  of  a.  (Stokes.) 


/: 


3.     Discuss  the  uniformity  of  the  convergence  of  the  integral 

/"" 

/     X  sin  (x^  —  ax)  dx. 
Jo 

3  j X sin (x^ - ax) dx=  -  (-  +  ^-3)  cos{x^-ax) 

(de  la  Valine  Poussin.) 

4.  Shew  that  /     exp  [  —  ei<^(x^-nx)]dx  converges  uniformly  in  the  range  {-^n,  ^ir) 

J  0 
of  values  of  a.  (Stokes.) 

/• "  x'^dx 

5.  Discuss  the  convergence  or  divergence  of   I      — ■ when   /x,  v,  p  are 

Jo    l+^''|sin^|P 
positive.  (Hardy.) 

6.  Examine  the  convergence  of  the  integrals 

7o    \^      2        ^l-e^J  X  '     Jo  of- 


f^        dx 
7.     Shew  that  I      „  exists. 

J  IT  x 


(Math.  Trip.  1914.) 


2  (sin  x)^ 

8.  Shew  that  I     .r-^e^in^  sin  2.ro?^  converges  if  a>0,  w>0.        (Math.  Trip.  1908.) 

J  a 

00 

9.  If  a  series  g{z)=   2  (cv  —  Cy+i)  sin(2i/  +  l)  m,  (in  which  Co  =  0),  converges  uniformly 

IT  °°      C 

in  an  interval,  shew  that  a  (z)   ■  is  the  derivative  of  the  series  f(z)=  2   —  sin  2v7tz. 

^  ^  ''  sm  TTZ  •'  ^  '     ^^i  V 

(Lerch.) 

10.  Shew  that  r  r  ...  f ""       d-^idx,...dx,        ^^^    r   r        r      dx,dx,...d^ 

J        J  J        (Xi'^  +  X^^+.-.+Xr,^)"  J        J  J        Xi''  +  X.f  +  ...+X„'' 

converge  when  a>hn  and  a~^+^~^  + ...+\~^<l  respectively.  (Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

11.  If/(ji;',  ^)  be  a  continuous  function  of  both  x  and  ^  in  the  ranges  {a^x^b),  (a^i/^b) 
except  that  it  has  ordinary  discontinuities  at  points  on  a  finite  number  of  curves  with 
continuously  turning  tangents,  each  of  which  meets  any  line  parallel  to  the  coordinate  axes 

only  a  finite  number  of  times,  then   I    f{x,  y)  dx  is  a  continuous  function  of  y. 

[Consider    I  -I-  I  +...+  I  {/(•^'j  l/  +  ^i)-f{^,  ]/)}  dx,  where  the  nmubers 

J  a  J  ai  +  fi  J  ttn+fn 

Si,  82,  ...  fi,  f2)  •••  ^^^  ^o  chosen  as  to  exclude  the  discontinuities  of /(.r,  y  +  /0  from  the 
range  of  integration  ;  aj,  a2,  ...  being  the  discontinuities  oi  fix,  y).']  (Bocher.) 

W.   M.   A.  6 


CHAPTER   V 

THE   FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES   OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  ; 
TAYLOR'S,   LAURENT'S   AND   LIOUVILLE'S   THEOREMS 

5'1.     Property  of  the  elementary  functions. 

The  reader  will  be  already  familiar  with  the  terra  elementary  function,  as 
used  .(in  text-books  on  Algebra,  Trigonometry,  and  the  Differential  Calculus) 
to  denote  certain  analytical  expressions*  depending  on  a  variable  z,  the 
symbols  involved  therein  being  those  of  elementary  algebra  together  with 
exponentials,  logarithms  and  the  trigonometrical  functions ;  examples  of  such 
expressions  are 

z^,,     e^,     log  z,     arc  sin  z"^. 

Such  combinations  of  the  elementary  functions  of  analysis  have  in  common 
a  remarkable  property,  which  will  now  be  investigated. 
Take  as  an  example  the  function  e^. 
Write  ,     .  e'=f{z). 

Then,  if  2^  be  a  fixed  point  and  if  z'  be  any  other  point,  we  have  ^ 

f{z)-f{z)_e^'-e^_^    e<^-)_-l 
z  —  z 

=  e~ 

and  since  the  last  series  in  brackets  is  uniformly  convergent  for  all  values  of 
z,  it  follows  (§  37)  that,  as  z  ^  z,  the  quotient 

/(^')-/(^) 

z  —  z 

tends  to  the  limit  e^,  uniformly  for  all  values  of  arg(ir'—  z). 
This  shews  that  the  limit  of 

fi^')-f{^) 
z  —  z 
is  in  this  case  independent  of  the  path  by  which  the  point  z    tends  towards 
coincidence  with  z. 

*  The  reader  will  observe  that  this  is  not  the  sense  in  which  the  term  function  is  defined 
(§  3'1)  in  this  work.  Thus  e.g.  x-iy  and  |  z  \  ave  functions  of  z  {  =  x  +  iy)  in  the  sense  of  §  3'1, 
but  are  not  elementary  functions  of  the  type  under  consideration. 


6-1-5  12]         FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES  OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  83 

It  will  be  found  that  this  property  is  shared  by  many  of  the  well-known 
elementary  functions;  namely,  that  if  f{z)  be  one  of  these  functions  and 
h  be  any  complex  number,  the  limiting  value  of 

\\f{^  +  h)-f{z)] 

exists  and  is  independent  of  the  mode  in  which  h  tends  to  zero. 

The  reader  will,  however,  easily  prove  that,  if/(^)  =  x—  iy,  where  z=x-\-  iy, 

then  lim*^ r — - — -  is  not  independent  of  the  mode  in  which  h-*-0. 

5*11.     Occasional  failure  of  the  property. 

For  each  of  the  elementary  functions,  however,  there  will  be  certain 
points  z  at  which  this  property  will  cease  to  hold  good.     Thus  it  does  not 

hold  for  the  function   at  the  point  z  =  a,  since 


lim 


..„    ,   J U 

h^o  h  [z  —  a  —  h     z  —  a] 
does  not  exist  when  z  =  a.     Similarly  it  does  not  hold  for  the  functions  log  z 
and  z^  at  the  point  ^=  0.        •    , ' 

These  exceptional  points  are  called  singular  points  or  singularities  of  the 
function  /(^)  under  consideration;  at  other  points  the  function  is  said  to  be 
analytic. 

The  property  does  not  hold  good  at  any  point  for  the  function  \z\. 

5"12.     Cauchy's*  definition  of  an  analytic  function  of  a  complex  variable. 

The  property  considered  in  §  5*11  will  be  taken  as  the  basis  of  our 
definition  of  an  analytic  function,  which  may  be  stated  as  follows. 

Let  a  two-dimensional  region  in  the  ^-plane  be  given;  and  let  m  be  a 
function  of  z  defined  uniquely  at  all  points  of  the  region.  Let  z,  z-\-hz  be 
values  of  the  variable  z  at  two  points,  and  u,  u  +  8u  the  corresponding  values 

ult 

of  u.    Then,  if,  at  any  point  z  within  the  area,  -^  tends  to  a  limit  when  S^-*-0, 

By-i-O,  independently  (where  8z  =  Sx  +  iBy),  u  is  said  to  be  a  function  of  z, 
which  is  analytic^  at  the  point.  If  the  function  is  analytic  and  one-valued 
at  all  points  of  the  region,  we  say  that  the  function  is  analytic  tlirougJiout 
the  region\. 

We  shall  frequently  use  the  word  '  function '  alone  to  denote  an  analytic 
function,  as  the  functions  studied  in  this  work  will  be  almost  exclusively 
analytic  functions. 

*  See  the  memoir  cited  in  §  5 "2. 

t  The  words  '  regular '  and  '  monogenic  '  are  sometimes  used  in  place  of  '  analytic' 

:J:  See  §  5-2  cor.  2,  footnote. 

6—2 


84  THE    PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

In  the  foregoing  definition,  the  function  u  has  been  defined  only  within 
a  certain  region  in  the  ^-plane.  As  will  be  seen  subsequently,  however,  the 
function  u  can  generally  be  defined  for  other  values  of  z  not  included  in  this 
region;  and  (as  in  the  case  of  the  elementary  functions  already  discussed) 
may  have  singularities,  for  which  the  fundamental  property  no  longer  holds, 
at  certain  points  outside  the  limits  of  the  region. 

We  shall  now  state  the  definition  of  analytic  functionality  in  a  more 
arithmetical  form. 

Let  f{z)  be  analytic  at  z,  and  let  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number ; 
then  we  can  find  numbers  I  and  S,  {h  depending  on  e)  such  that 

f{z')-f{^) 


-I 


<  € 


whenever  \  z'  —  z  \  <  B. 

l{f{z)  is  analytic  at  all  points  2^  of  a  region,  I  obviously  depends  on  ^ ;  we 
consequently  write  I  =/'  (2). 

Hence  f{z)  =f(z)  +  {z' - z)  f  {z)  +  v  (/ - z), 

where  w  is  a  function  of  z  and  /  such  that  |  ?;  |  <  e  when  \  z'  —  z  \  <  8. 
Example  1.     Find  the  points  at  which  the  following  functions  are  not  analytic  : 

2—1 

(i)     z^.  (ii)     cosec2      (z  =  mtt,  ?i  any  integer).  (iii)     -^ — .       „      (2  =  2,3). 

(iv)       e^         (2  =  0).  (V)       {{Z-\)Z}^        (2  =  0,1). 

Example  2.  If  z=x-iriy,  f{z)  =  u-\-iv,  where  u,  v,  x,  y  are  real  and  /  is  an  analytic 
function,  shew  that 

d-x  =  d-r      d-r-dx-  (Riemann.) 

5*13.     An  application  of  the  modified  Heine-Borel  theorem. 

Let  f{z)  be  analytic  at  all  points  of  a  continuum ;  and  on  any  point  z  of 
the  boundary  of  the  continuum  let  numbers  f  (z),  8  (8  depending  on  z)  exist 
such  that 

\f{z')-f{z)-iz'-z)f,{z)\<e\z'-z\ 

whenever  \z'  —  z\  <8  and  /  is  a  point  of  the  continuum  or  its  boundary. 

[We  write  /j  (2)  instead  of  /'  (2)  as  the  differential  coefficient  might  not  exist  when 
2'  approaches  2  from  outside  the  boundary  so  that/j  (2)  is  not  necessarily  a  unique  derivate.] 

The  above  inequality  is  obviously  satisfied  for  all  points  z  of  the  continuum 
as  well  as  boundary  points. 

Applying  the  two-dimensional  form  of  the  theorem  of  §  3'6,  we  see  that 
the  region  formed  by  the  continuum  and  its  boundary  can  be  divided  into 
a  finite  number  of  parts  (squares  with  sides  parallel  to  the  axes  and  their 


5-13,  52]         FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES   OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  85 

interiors,  or  portions  of  such  squares)  such  that  inside  or  on  the  boundary  of 
any  part  there  is  one  point  z^  such  that  the  inequality 

I  /(/)  -f{z,)  -  {z'  -  z,)f,  (z,)  \<e\z'-z,\ 

is  satisfied  by  all  points  z'  inside  or  on  the  boundary  of  that  part. 

52.      Cauchy's  theorem*  on  the  integral  of  a  function  round  a  contour. 

A  simple  closed  curve  G  in  the  plane  of  the  variable  z  is  often  called 
a  contour;  if  A,  B,  D  be  points  taken  in  order  in  the  counter-clockwise  sense 
along  the  arc  of  the  contour,  and  if  f{z)  be  a  one-valued  continuous  + 
function  of  z  (not  necessarily  analytic)  at  all  points  on  the  arc,  then  the 
integral 

1  /  {z)  dz     or     I     f{z)  dz 

J  ABDA  J  (C) 

taken  round  the  contour,  starting  from  the  point  A  and  returning  to  A  again, 
is  called  the  integral  of  f{z)  taken  along  the  contour.  Clearly  the  value  of  the 
integral  taken  along  the  contour  is  unaltered  if  some  point  in  the  contour 
other  than  A  is  taken  as  the  starting-point. 

We  shall  now  prove  a  result  due  to  Cauchy,  which  may  be  stated  as 
follows.  If  f{z)  is  a  function  of  z,  analytic  at  all  points  on^  and  inside  a 
contour  G,  then 

\    f{z)dz  =  0. 

For  divide  up  the  interior  of  G  by  lines  parallel  to  the  real  and  imaginary 
axes  in  the  manner  of  §  5"13  ;  then  the  interior  of  C  is  divided  into  a  number 
of  regions  whose  boundaries  are  squares  Cj,  Co,  ...  Gm  and  other  regions 
whose  boundaries  Dj,  D^,  ...  Dy  are  portions  of  sides  of  squares  and  parts 

of  C;  consider 

Mr  N     c 

2  f{z)dz+t    \       f{z)dz, 

71  =  1  J  iCn)  «  =  1   J  (Dn) 

each  *  of  the  paths  of  integration  being  taken  counter-clockwise ;  in  the 
complete  sum  each  side  of  each  square  appears  twice  as  a  path  of  integration, 
and  the  integrals  along  it  are  taken  in  opposite  directions  and  consequently 
cancel§;  the  only  parts  of  the  sum  which  survive  are  the  integrals  of/(^) 

*  Memoire  siir  les  integrales  defmles  prises  entre  des  limites  imaginaires  (1825).  The  proof 
here  given  is  that  due  to  Goursat  {Cours  d' Analyse,  t.  ii.). 

t  It  is  sufficient  for  f(z)  to  be  continuous  when  variations  of  z  along  the  arc  only  are 
considered. 

:{:  It  is  not  necessary  that  f(z)  should  be  analytic  on  C  (it  is  sufficient  that  it  be  continuous 
on  and  inside  C),  but  if  f{z)  is  not  analytic  on  C,  the  theorem  is  much  harder  to  prove.  This 
proof  merely  assumes  that/'  (z)  exists  at  all  points  on  and  inside  C.  Earlier  proofs  made  more 
extended  assumptions ;  thus  Cauchy's  proof  assumed  the  continuity  of  /'  {z).  Riemann's 
proof  made  an  equivalent  assumption.  Goursat's  first  proof  assumed  that  f(z)  was  uniformly 
differentiable  throughout  C. 

§  See  §  4-6,  example. 


86  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

taken  along  a  number  of  arcs  which  together  make  up  G,  each  arc  being 

taken  in  the  same  sense  as  in  I     f{z)dz;  these  integrals  therefore  just  make 

hc) 


Now  consider  f{z)dz.     With  the  notation  of  §  5"12, 

J  (C„) 

[      f{z)  dz=\  .     {f{z,)  +  (^  -  z,)  f  {z,)  +  {z-z,)v]  dz 

J  (Cu)  J  {Cn) 

=  {/(0-'2^i/'(^i)}  I        dz+f'(z,)  zdz  +  {z-z,)vdz. 

•I  (Cn)  UCn)  J  (Cn) 

But  [       dz  =  [z].,  =0,       f       zdz=    Iz^l     =0, 

JiCn)  ^"  J(Cn)  L  JCn 

by  the  examples  of  §  4*6,  since  the  end  points  of  C„  coincide. 
Now  let  l^  be  the  side  of  (7„  and  A^  the  area  of  C„, 
Then,  using  §  4*62, 

f{z)dz\  =  n       {z  —  z^)vdz    <,  \        ](z—Zi)vdz\  .-       ■ 

J  (Cn)  I  M(C„)  J(Cn)' 


<el^^/2.        \dz\  =  eln^/2.4>l^=4,eAn^/2. 


In  like  manner 


(Dn) 


f{z)dz 


^  I        \{z  —  Zi)  vdz  I 
Ur>n) 


where  A  J  is  the  area  of  the  complete  square  of  which  D^  is  part,  Z,/  is  the 
side  of  this  square  and  X,^  is  the  length  of  the  part  of  G  which  lies  inside  this 
square.  Hence,  if  \  be  the  whole  length  of  C,  while  I  is  the  side  of  a  square 
which  encloses  all  the  squares  C„  and  D^, 


(C) 


f(z)dz 


^  s 


M  =  l  I  J  (Cn) 


f{z)dz 


+  s 


(Dn) 


f(z)dz 


<46V2    S  A^+  t  AJ  +  l  %  \A 

(.«  =  !  n  =  l  n  =  l        } 

<  46  V2  .  (l'  +  IX). 


Now  e  is  arbitrarily  small,  and  I,  \  and   I      fi^)  dz  are  independent  of  e. 

-'  iC) 

It  therefore  follows  from  this  inequality  that  the  only  value  which   1    f(z)  dz 

J  c 

can  have  is  zero ;  and  this  is  Cauchy's  result. 


5'2]  FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES   OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  87 

Corollary  1.  If  there  are  two  paths  z^AZ  and  z^^BZ  from  ^o  to  Z,  and  if  f(z)  is  a 
function  of  z  analytic  at  all  points  on  these  curves  and  throughout  the  domain  enclosed  by 

these  two  paths,  then    |    f{z)  dz  has  the  same  value  whether  the  path  of  integration  is 

Zf^^AZ  ox  z^BZ.  This  follows  from  the  fact  that  zqAZBzq  is  a  contour,  and  so  the  integral 
taken  round  it  (which  is  the  difference  of  the  integrals  along  zqAZ  and  ZqBZ)  is  zero. 

Thus,  \i  f{z)  be  an  analytic  function  of  z,  the  value  of   1       f{z)dz  is  to  a  certain  extent 

J  AB 

independent  of  the  choice  of  the  arc  AB,  and  depends  only  on  the  terminal  points  A  and  B. 
It  must  be  borne  in  mind  that  this  is  only  the  case  when  f{z)  is  an  analytic  function  in  the 
sense  of  §  5'12. 

Corollary  2.  Suppose  that  two  simple  closed  curves  Co  and  Cy  are  given,  such  that  Co 
completely  encloses  Cj,  as  e.g.  would  be  the  case  if  Co  and  C\  were  concentric  circles  or 
confocal  ellipses. 

Suppose  moreover  that  f{z)  is  a  function  which  is  analytic*  at  all  points  on  Co  and  Cj 
and  throughout  the  ring-shaped  region  contained  between  Co  and  Ci .  Then  by  di-awing  a 
network  of  intersecting  lines  in  this  ring-shaped  space,  we  can  shew,  exactly  as  in  the 
theorem  just  proved,  that  the  integral 


I 


f{z)dz 


is  zero,  where  the  integration  is  taken  round  the  whole  boundary  of  the  ring-shaped  space; 
this  boundary  consisting  of  two  curves  Co  and  Ci,  the  one  described  in  the  counter-clockwise 
direction  and  the  other  described  in  the  clockwise  direction. 

Corollary  3.  In  general,  if  any  connected  region  be  given  in  the  2-plane,  bounded  by 
any  number  of  simple  closed  curves  Co,  Ci,  C2,  ...,  and  if /(2)  be  any  function  of  z  which 
is  analytic  and  one- valued  everywhere  in  this  region,  then 


} 


f{z)dz 

is  zero,  where  the  integral  is  taken  round  the  whole  boundary  of  the  region  ;  this  boundary 
consisting  of  the  curves  Co,  Ci,  ...,  each  described  in  such  a  sense  that  the  region  is  kept 
either  always  on  the  right  or  always  on  the  left  of  a  person  walking  in  the  sense  in  question 
round  the  boundary. 

An  extension  of  Cauchy's  theorem   I  f{z)dz=0,  to  curves  lying  on  a  cone  whose  vertex 

is  at  the   origin,  has  been   made  by  Raout  {JVouv.  Annales  de  Math.   (3)  xvi.  (1897), 

pp.  365-7).    Osgood  {Bull.  Amer.  Math.  Soc,  1896)  has  shewn  that  the  property  j  f{z)dz=0 

may  be  taken  as  the  property  defining  an  analytic  function,  the  other  properties  being 
deducible  from  it. 

Example.     A  ring-shaped  region  is  bounded  by  the  two  circles  [  2 1  =  1  and  ;  s  ,  =  2  in  the 

/dz 
— ,  where  the  integral  is  taken  round  the  boundary 

of  this  region,  is  zero. 

*  The  phrase  '  analytic  throughout  a  region  '  implies  one-valuedness  (§  5-12)  ;  that  is  to  say 
that  after  z  has  described  a  closed  path  surrounding  CQ,f{z)  has  returned  to  its  initial  value.  A 
function  such  as  log 2  considered  in  the  region  1^]*]  ^2  will  be  a^iA  to  be  'analytic  at  all 
points  of  the  region.' 


88  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

For  the  boundary  consists  of  the  circumference  |z|  =  l,  described  in  the  clockwise 
direction,  together  with  the  circumference  |  z  |  =  2,  described  in  the  counter-clockwise 
direction.  Thus  if  for  points  on  the  first  circumference  we  write  z=e^'^,  and  for  points  on 
the  second  circumference  we  write  z  =  2e'<t>,  then  d  and  <f)  are  real,  and  the  integral  becomes 

Jo  e«*  Jo         2e"/> 

5"21.     The  valube  of  an  analytic  function  at  a  point,  expressed  as  an  integral 
taken  round  a  contour  enclosing  the  point. 

Let  C  be  a  contour  within  and  on  which  f{z)  is  an  analytic  function  of  z. 

Then,  if  a  be  any  point  within  the  contour, 

.fJA 

z  —  a 

is  a  function  of  z,  which  is  analytic  at  all  points  within  the  contour  C  except 
the  point  z  =  a. 

Now,  given  e,  we  can  find  S  such  that 

I  /(^)  -/(")  -(z-a)f(a)\^e\z-a\ 
whenever  \z  —  a\<  B;  with  the  point  a  as  centre  describe  a  circle  7  of  radius 
r  <  B,  r  being  so  small  that  7  lies  wholly  inside  C. 

Then  in  the  space  between  7  and  G  f(z)/(z  —  a)  is  analytic,  and  so,  by    ' 

S  5'2  corollary  2,  we  have 

j  f(z)dz^ff(z)dz 

J  c  z  —  a       j  y  z  —  a 
where  I     and  1     denote  integrals  taken  counter-clockwise  along  the  curves 

C  and  7  respectively. 

But,  since  |  2:  —  a  |  <  8  on  7,  we  have 

r  f(z)dz  ^  f  f(a)+(z-a)f(a)  +  v(z-a)  ^^ 

J  y  z  —  a      J  y  z  —  a  ' 

where  j  ^'  j  <  e ;  and  so 

Now,  if  z  be  on  7,  we  may  write 

z  —  a  =  re^^, 
where  r  is  the  radius  of  the  circle  7,  and  consequently 

jyZ-a     Jo       re'^  Jo 

and  I    dz  =  j     ire'^dd  =  0  ; 


also,  by  §  4'62, 


// 


dz  \  ■C  €  .  27rr. 


521,  522]         FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES  OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  89 


Thus  I  [  f^^  -  27nf{a)   =    f  ,dz 

\Jc  z-a  -^  ^  '         jy 


^  27rre. 


I 


But  the  left-hand  side  is  independent  of  e,  and  so  it  must  be  zero,  since  e 
is  arbitrary ;  that  is  to  say 

•^  ^  '     Ittx  J  c  z  -  a 

This  remarkable  result  expresses  the  value  of  a  function  'f{z)  (which  is 
analytic  on  and  inside  G)  at  any  point  a  within  a  contour  G,  in  terms  of  an 
integral  which  depends  only  on  the  value  of  f{z)  at  points  on  the  contour 
itself 

Corollary.     If  f{z)  is  an  analytic  one-valued  function  of  «  in  a  ring-shaped  region 
bounded  by  two  curves  C  and  C",  and  a  is  a  point  in  the  region,  then 

2nt  J  c  Z  —  a  ZttI  J  c'  z  —  ct 

where  C  is  the  outer  of  the  curves  and  the  integrals  are  taken  counter-clockwise. 

5"22.     The  derivates  of  an  analytic  function  f(z). 

The  function  /'  (z),  which  is  the  limit  of 

f(z  +  h)-f(z) 
h 

as  h  tends  to  zero,  is  called  the  derivate  oi  f(z).  We  shall  now  shew  that 
/'  (z)  is  itself  an  analytic  function  of  z,  and  consequently  itself  possesses  a 
derivate. 

For  if  C  be  a  contour  surrounding  the  point  a,  and  situated  entirely 
within  the  region  in  which  f{z)  is  analytic,  we  have 

/(a)=lim-^("  +  ^> ->'<"> 
^-♦0  h 

=  Um  ,1^  I  (     f^^,  -  [  /i^l 
h-^n  ZTTih  [J  c  z  —  a  —  h     J  c  z  —  a 


j,^Q  'Zwi  ]  c{z-  a)  {z-a-  h) 

27ri  J c  (^  —  «)^      h^o  27rt  J c  (^  —  (^y (z—  a  —  h)' 
Now,  on  C,  f(z)  is  continuous  and  therefore  bounded,  and  so  is  (z  —  a)' 
while  we  can  take  j  h  \  less  than  the  upper  bound  of  ^\z  —  a\. 


90  -    '  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 


Therefore 


/(^) 


is  bounded ;  let  its  upper  bound  be  K. 


{z  —  af{z-  a  —  h) 
Then,  if  I  be  the  length '  of  C, 

lim  ^.  f   , {y^^       ,,  k  lim  I A  I  (2^)-^Kl  =  0, 

and  consequently  /  (a)  =  ^.  j^  ^^", , 

a  formula  which  expresses  the  value  of  the  derivate  of  a  function  at  a  point 
as  an  integral  taken  along  a  contour  enclosing  the  point. 

From  this  formula  we  have,  if  the  points  a  and  a  +  h  are  inside  C, 

f(a  +  h)-f(a)_    1     rf(z)dz\         1 1^ 

h  ^TTiJc      h       \(z-a-hy     {z  -  of 

2iz-a--^h 
'    f{z)dz 


2'7riJ  c  '  {z-a-  hf  (z  -  af 

_  2  f  mdz 

and  it  is  easily  seen  that  A^  is  a  bounded  function  of  z  when  \h\<  ^l^  —  ci\' 

Therefore,  as  h  tends  to  zero,  h~~^  {/' (a  +  h)  —  f  {a}]  tends  to  a  limit, 
namely 

2    /•    f(z)dz 


i 


27ri  J  c  {z  —  af 

Since  /'  (a)  has  a  unique  differential  coefficient,  it  is  an  analytic  function 
of  a;  its  derivate,  which  is  represented  by  the  expression  just  given,  is 
denoted  by  f"  {a),  and  is  called  the  second  derivate  of /(a). 

Similarly  it  can  be  shewn  t\ia.tf"{a)  is  an  analytic  function  of  a,  possessing 
a  derivate  equal  to 

27ri  Jclz-  ay ' 

this  is  denoted  by  /"'  (a),  and  is  called  the  thi7-d  derivate  of  /(a).     And  in 
general  an  nth  derivate  /'"^'  (a)  of  f{a)  exists,  expressible  by  the  integral 

7?!    [     f(z)dz 


27ri  J  c{z-  af^^ 

and  having  itself  a  derivate  of  the  form 

{n  +  1) !  r     f{z)dz    . 
2Tri     Jc(z-ay+'' 

the  reader  will  see  that  this  can  be  proved  by  induction  without  difficulty. 


5-23,  5*3]         FUNDAMENTAL   PROPERTIES   OF   ANALYTIC   FUNCTIONS  91 

A  function  which  possesses  a  first  derivate  with  respect  to  the  complex 
variable  z  at  all  points  of  a  closed  two-dimensional  region  in  the  2^-plane 
therefore  possesses  derivates  of  all  orders  at  all  points  inside  the  region. 

5'23.     Cauchys  inequality  for  /'"'  (a). 

Let  f{z)  be  analytic  on  and  inside  a  circle  C  with  centre  a  and  radius  r. 
Let  M  be  the  upper  bound  of  f{z)  on  the  circle.     Then,  by  §  4-62, 

'  -^      ^  ^ '     'Ztr  J  c  ^"^'     ■ 
M.nl 

Example.     If/ (2)  is  canalytic,  z  =  x-\-iy  and  V''  =  ^-^  +  ^-2  5  shew  that 

V21ogi/(2)|  =  0;  and  V-i  1/(3)  |>0 
iinless/(2)=0  or/'(2)  =  0.  (Trinity,  1910.) 

5*3.     Analytic  functions  represented  by  uniformly  convergent  series. 
Let    2  /w(2')  be  a  series  such  that  (i)  it  converges  uniformly  along  a 

n=0 

contour  C,  (ii)  f^  (z)  is  analytic  throughout  C  and  its  interior. 

00 

Then     %  fn  (z)   converges,  and  the  sum  of  the   series   is   an   analytic 

n=0 

function  throughout  C  and  its  interior. 

CO 

For  let  a  be  any  point  inside  C;  on  C,  let    S  /„  (z)  =  $  (z). 

«=o 

dz 


Then  ![*(£)<;,       l.[   J  i/.  (4 


z  —  a 


„=o  r^TTi  J  c^-a      ) 
00 
by*  §4*7.     But    this  last  series,  by  §  5"21,  is    S  fn{a);   the   series   under 

w=0 

consideration  therefore  converges  at  all  points  inside  C;  let  its  sum  inside 
G  (as  well  as  on  C)  be  called  ^(z).  Then  the  function  is  analytic  if  it 
has  a  unique  differential  coefficient  at  all  points  inside  C. 

But  if  a  and  a  +  h  be  inside  C, 

^{a  +  h)-^  (a)        1     f  ^(z)dz 


h  2iTi  j  c{z —  a){z  —  a  —  h)' 

and  hence,  as  in  §  5-22,  lim  [{^  (a  +  h)  —  ^  {a)]  h~^']  exists  and  is  equal  to 

*  Since  j  z  -  a  |~i  is  bounded  when  a  is  fixed  and  2  is  on  C  the  uniformity  of  the  convergence 

of  2  /„(z)/(z-a)  follows  from  that  of  S  f^,{z). 
n=0  w=0 


92  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  Y 

1      r       <E>(^)  .        . 

^ — .  I    7 ^dz;   and  therefore  ^(z)  is  analytic  inside   G.      Further,  by 

27ri  J  c{z  —  o)  ''  '' 

transforming  the  last  integral  in  the  same  way  as  we  transformed  the  first 

00  oo 

one,  we  see  that  <!>'  {a)  =  2  //  (a),  so  that    S  /„  (a)  may  be  '  differentiated 

M=0  w=0 

term  by  term.' 

If  a  series  of  analytic  functions  converges  only  at  points  of  a  curve  which  is  not  closed 
nothing  can  be  inferred  as  to  the  convergence  of  the  derived  series*. 

"^  COS  7X3C 

Thus  2  ( — )" n—  converges  uniformly  for  real  values  of  x  {%  3"34).     But  the  derived 

n=\  n^  '' 

00  sin  Thz 

series   2  (  — )"~^  converges  non-uniformly  near  2  =  (2m+l)7r,  {m  any  integer)  ;  and 

n=l  ^* 

the  derived  series  of  this,  viz.    2  ( —  )"~^  cos  nz,  does  not  converge  at  all. 

Corollary.     By  §  3*7,  the  sum  of  a  power  series  is  analytic  inside  its  circle  of  con- 
vergence. 

5'31.     Analytic  functions  represented  hy  integrals. 

Let  f{t,  z)  satisfy  the  following  conditions  when  t  lies  on  a  certain  path 
of  integration  (a,  h)  and  z  is  any  point  of  a  region  8 : 

?)f 
(i)     /  and   ~-  are  continuous  functions  of  t. 

(ii)     /  is  an  analytic  function  of  z. 

(iii)     The  continuity  of  ^-  qua  function  of  z  is  uniform  with  respect  to 
the  variable  t. 

Then       f{t,  z)  dt  is  an  analytic  function  of  z.     For,  by  §  4*2,  it  has  the 
unique  derivate  \' —  dt. 

J  a         OZ 

5'32.     Analytic  functions  represented  by  infinite  integrals. 

From  §  4-44  (II)  corollary,  it  follows  that        f{t,  z)  dt  is  an  analytic 

J  a 

function  of  z  at  all  points  of  a  region  ^S^  if  (i)  the  integral  converges,  (ii)  f{t,  z) 
is  an  analytic  function  of  z  when  t  is  on  the  path  of  integration  and  z  is  on  aS^, 

(iii)        V        is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables,  (iv)   /      --^' —  dt 
^        dz  Ja        dz 

converges  uniformly  throughout  S. 

For  if  these  conditions  are  satisfied   1     f{t,  z)  dt  has  the  unique  derivate 

J  a 


f 

J  a 


OZ 


*  This  might  have  been  anticipated  as  the  main  theorem  of  this  section  deals  with  uniformity 
of  convergence  over  a  two-dimensional  region. 


5-31-5-4]       Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  93 

A  case  of  very  great  importance  is  afforded  by  the  integral   /     e~'^/(<)  dt, 

where  f{t)  is  continuous  and  |/(0I  <  ^^'^^  where  K,  r  are  independent  of  t; 
it  is  obvious  from  the  conditions  stated  that  the  integral  is  an  analytic 
function  of  z  when  R (z) ^ r,  > r.     [Condition  (iv) is  satisfied,  by  §  4431  (I), 

since  I     te^^~^^^^dt  converges.] 

5*4.     Taylors  Theorem*. 

Consider  a  function  f{z),  which  is  analytic  in  the  neighbourhood  of  a 
point  z  =  a.  Let  C  be  a  circle  with  a  as  centre  in  the  ^-plane,  which  does 
not  have  any  singular  point  of  the  function  f{z)  on  or  inside  it ;  so  that  f{z) 
is  analytic  at  all  points  on  and  inside  G.  Let  z  =  a+h  be  any  point  inside 
the  circle  C.     Then,  by  §  5*21,  we  have 

•^  27rr  J  c  z  —  a  —  h 

_J_r  (    1  h  A"  ^1"+^  I 

''liriic^^''^       \z-a^{z~af^  ---'^  {z-aY+^'^{z-aY^'{z-a-h)] 

=  f{o)  +  hf  (a)  +  %,  /'  (a)  +  . . .  +  ^  /"»'  {a)  +  ^.  1  fif>dz-h''^' 

y  V  /^  y    V  y-Tgi^    V  /  ^t-^      V  /     ^iri  } c  {z  -  aY+^  {z  -  a  -  h) 

f(z) 

But  when  z  is  on  C,  the  modulus  of  — p  is  continuous,  and  so, 

z—  a  —  h 

by  §  3"61  cor.  (ii),  will  not  exceed  some  finite  number  M. 
Therefore,  by  §4-62, 


•I'm  J  c(z  - 


f(z)  dz .  k'^^ 


^  M.27rR  A  h  ly+i 
^       27r       \R)      ' 


a)'»+^  {z-a- h) 

where  R  is  the  radius  of  the  circle  C,  so  that  'i.irR  is  the  length  of  the  path 
of  integration  in  the  last  integral,  and  R  =  \z  —  a\  for  points  z  on  the  cir- 
cumference of  G. 

The  right-hand  side  of  the  last  inequality  tends  to  zero  as  n^  cc .     We 
have  therefore 

/(a  +  /0=/(a)-h;./'(a)  +  |',/"(a)  +  ...+^/<-)(rO+..., 
which  we  can  write 

This  result  is  known  as  Taylor  s  Theorem ;  and  the  proof  given  is  due  to 
Cauchy.     It  follows  that  the  radius  of  convergence  of  a  power  series  is  always 

*    The   formal  expansion  was  first  published  by  Dr  Brook  Taylor  (1715)   in   his  Methodus 
Incrementorum. 


94  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

at  least  so  large  as  only  just  to  exclude  from  the  interior  of  the  circle  of  con- 
vergence the  nearest  singularity  of  the  function  represented  hy  the  series.  And 
by  §  5*3  corollary,  it  follows  that  the  radius  of  convergence  is  not  larger 
than  the  number  just  specified.  Hence  the  radius  of  convergence  is  just  such 
as  to  exclude  from  the  interior  of  the  circle  that  singularity  of  the  function 
which  is  nearest  to  a. 

At  this  stage  we  may  introduce  some  terms  which  will  be  frequently 
used. 

If  f(a)  =  0,  the  function  f{z)  is  said  to  have  a  zero  at  the  point  z  =  a. 
If  at  such  a  point  /'  (a)  is  different  from  zero, .the  zero  of  /(a)  is  said  to  be 
simple;  if,  however, /'(a), /"(a),  .../<"~^>  (a)  are  all  zero,  so  that  the  Taylor's 
expansion  of  f(z)  aX  z  =  a  begins  with  a  term  in  {z  —  a)",  then  the  function 
f{z)  is  said  to  have  a  zero  of  the  nth  07^der  at  the  point  z  =  a. 

Example  1.     Find  the  function  /(s),  which  is  analytic  throughout  the  circle  C  and  its 
interior,  whose  centre  is  at  the  origin  and  whose  radius  is  unity,  and  has  the  value 

a  —  cos  6  .  sin  6 

+  2 


a^  -  2a  cos  ^  + 1        a^  —  2a  cos  ^  + 1 
(where  a>l  and  6  is  the  vectorial  angle)  at  points  on  the  circumference  of  O. 

We  have 

f{z)dz  .         .,  ,       ,  ',.. 


•'      ^  '     2m  J  c  2"^ 
27n  J  0 
"277  jo      a-e"»9  ~"27rt  jc'S"(a-2)^L^«- J 


«,7>    -7/1   a-cos(94-isui^      ,      ,,.  ... 

e -  "'« .  idQ .  — r. — jT n — r  ■■<     (puttuig  z = e^^) 

a^-2acos^+l  '     ^^  e.  i 


Therefore  by  Maclaurin's  Theorem*, 

or  f{z)  =  {a-z)~'^  for  all  points  within  the  circle. 

This  example  raises  the  interesting  question,  Will  it  still  be  convenient  to  define  f{z) 
as  (a-z)~i.  at  points  outside  the  circle  ?     This  will  be  discussed  in  i^  5-51. 

Example  2.     Prove  that  the  arithmetic  mean  of  all  values  of  s""  2  (XyS",  for  points  z  on 

the  circumference  of  the  circle  |2|  =  1,  is  a„,  if  "SavZ"  is  analytic  throughout  the  circle  and 
its  interior. 

/■(")  (0) 
Let  2  at,z''=f{z),  so  that  a„=- — -—  .     Then,  writing  2  =  e'^,  and  calling  C  the  circle 

1     r^-f{z)d6        1     [  f{z)dz     /(")(0)     ^, 


1_     f2nf(z)dB^     1 

27r  j  0         2"  271 


*  The  result / (2)  =/ (0)  + 2/' {0)+-/"(0)  +  ...,  obtained  by  putting  a  =  0  in  Taylor's  Theorem, 

is  usually  called  Maclaurin's  Theorem ;    it  was  discovered  by  Stirling  (1717)  and  published  by 
Maclaurin  (1742)  in  his  Fluxions. 


5'41]  Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  95 

Example  3.     Let /(«)  =  «'■ ;  then  f{z-\-h)  is  an  analytic  function  of  h  when  |  A  |  <  |  a  |, 

T  (t  —  1 ) 

for  all  values  of  r  ;  and  so  («  +  A)*'  =  «'"  +  r«'"~iA+  --- — -z'^~^h'^  + ...,  this  series  converging 

when   I  A  I  <  \  z\.     This  is  the  binomial  theorem. 

Example  4.  Prove  that  if  A  is  a  positive  constant,  and  (1  -  'izh-^h^)~^  is  expanded  in 
the  form 

,      ,  1+AP,(2)+A2P2(2)+A3P3(2)  + (A), 

(where  Pn{z)  is  easily  seen  to  be  a  polynomial  of  degree  n  in  z),  then  this  series  converges 
so  long  as  z  is  in  the  interior  of  an  ellipse  whose  foci  are  the  points  2  =  1  and  z=  —  1,  and 
whose  semi-major  axis  is  \{h  +  h~'^). 

Let  the  series  be  first  regarded  as  a  function  of  h.  It  is  a  power  series  in  A,  and 
therefore  converges  so  long  as  the  point  h  lies  within  a  circle  in  the  A-plane.  The  centre 
of  this  circle  is  the  point  A  =  0,  and  its  circumference  will  be  such  as  to  pass  through  that 
singularity  of  {\  —  2zh-\-h?')~^  which  is  nearest  to  h  =  0. 

But  I  -<izh  +  h'^  =  {h-z  +  {z^  -\)^}  [h-  z-{z^  -l)^, 

So  the  singularities  of  {l-'izh  +  h?)'^  are  the  points  h  =  z-{z'^-\)^  and  h  =  z  +  {z'^-\)^. 
[These  singularities  are  branch  points  (see  §  5'7).] 

Thus  the  series  (A)  converges  so  long  as  \h\  is  less  than  both 

|2-(22-i)i!  and  |2  +  (22-i)i|. 

Draw  an  ellipse  in  the  z-plane  passing  through  the  point  z  and  having  its  foci  at  ±1. 
Let  a  be  its  semi-major  axis,  and  6  the  eccentric  angle  of  z  on  it. 

Then'       '    '  2  =  acos  ^-t-t"(a2— 1)2  sin^, 

which  gives  2±(22-l)^=  {a  +  (a2- l)i}  (cos^  +  isiu^), 

so  .,:     .,•  |z±(s2-l)*|  =  a±(a2_i)4. 

Thus  the  series  (A)  converges  so  long  as  h  is  less  than  the  smaller  of  the  numbers 

a  +  {a^-\)^  and  a  —  {a?-\)^,  i.e.  so  long  as  h  is  less  than  a—  (a^  — 1)2.  But  A  =  a  — (a^-  l)i 
when  a=\  {h  +  h~^). 

Therefore  the  series  (A)  converges  so  long  as  z  is  within  an  ellipse  whose  foci  are  1  and 
—  1,  and  whose  semi-major  axis  is  ^{h  +  h~^). 

5'41.     Forms  of  the  remainder  in  Taylor  s  series. 

Let  f{x)  be  a  real  function  of  a  real  variable ;  and  let  it  have  continuous 
differential  coefficients  of  the  first  n  orders  when  a  %  x  %  a-{-h. 
If  0^t%l,  we  have 

(1    (n-l   hm  \         hn  {^  ^  f\n—i 

Integrating  this  between  the  limits  0  and  1,  we  have 

f{a  +  h)=f(a)+:^    ^, /*"'(«)+  A      1     f-Ha  +  th)dL 

Let  R^  =  ^-^^,  £  (1  -  0"-'  /'"'  (a  +  th)  dt ; 

and  let  jj  be  a  positive  integer  such  that  p  $  n. 


96  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

hn         n 

Then        Rn  =  7 ^,      (1  -  ty-'  ■  (1  -  0""^  /'"» (a  +  th)  dt. 

{n—  L)]j  0 

Let  U,  L  be  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  of  (1  -  ty-Pf''^  (a  +  th). 

Then 

r  L{1  -  t)P-'  dt<  f  (1  -  t)P-^ .  (1  -  ty-Pf''^  (a  +  th)  dt<[   U{1  -  t)P-'  dt. 
Jo  Jo  Jo 

Since  (1  —  i)"~^y<"'  (a  +  th)  is  a  continuous  function  it  passes  through  all 
values  between  U  and  L,  and  hence  we  can  find  6  such  that  0  ^  ^  ^  1,  and 


/: 


(1  _  ty-ifin)  (a  4-  th)  dt=p-'  (1  -  ^)«-i'/(")  {a  +  Oh). 
0 

h^ 

Therefore  Rn  =  , ttt"  (1 "  QY'P  f^'^^  (a  +  Qh). 

{n  — 1)1  p  ^  '       *' 

h'^ 
Writing  p  =  n,we  get  Rn  =  —;/*"'  («•  +  6h),  which  is  Lagrange's  form  for 

h^ 
the  remaiTider ;  and  writing p  =  l,  we  get  Rn  =  ,    _  ^x,  (1  —  ^y'~^/''*'  {a  +  Qh), 

which  is  Cauohy  s  form,  for  the  remainder. 
Taking  tj  =  1  in  this  result,  we  get 

f{a  +  h)-f{a)  =  hf{a  +  eh) 
if  f  {x)  is  continuous   when   a^x^a+h  ;   this   result  is  usually  known  as  the   First 
Mean  Value  Theorem  (see  also  §  4"14). 

Darboux  gave  in  1876  {Journal  de  Math.  (3)  11.  p.  291)  a  form  for  the  remainder  in 
Taylor's  Series,  which  is  applicable  to  complex  variables  and  resembles  the  above  form 
given  by  Lagrange  for  the  case  of  real  variables. 

5'5.     The  Process  of  Continuation. 

Near  every  point  P,Zq,  in  the  neighbourhood  of  which  a  function  f{z)  is 
analytic,  we  have  seen  that  an  expansion  exists  for  the  function  as  a  series 
of  ascending  positive  integral  powers  of  {z  —  z^,  the  coefficients  in  which 
involve  the  successive  derivates  of  the  function  at  Zq. 

Now  let  A  be  the  singularity  of  fiz)  which  is  nearest  to  P.  Then  the 
circle  within  which  this  expansion  is  valid  has  P  for  centre  and  PA  for 
radius. 

Suppose  that  we  are  merely  given  the  values  of  a  function  at  all  points  of 
the  circumference  of  a  circle  slightly  smaller  than  the  circle  of  convergence 
and  concentric  with  it  together  with  the  condition  that  the  function  is  to  be 
analytic  throughout  the  interior  of  the  larger  circle.  Then  the  preceding 
theorems  enable  us  to  find  its  value  at  all  points  within  the  smaller  circle 
and  to  determine  the  coefficients  in  the  Taylor  series  proceeding  in  powers 
of  z  —  Z(^.  The  question  arises,  Is  it  possible  to  define  the  function  at  points 
outside  the  circle  in  such  a  way  that  the  function  is  analytic  throughout 
a  larger  domain  than  the  interior  of  the  circle  ? 


6'6]  Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  97 

In  other  words,  given  a  power  series  which  converges  and  represents  a 
function  only  at  points  within  a  circle,  to  define  hy  means  of  it  the  values 
of  the  function  at  points  outside  the  circle. 

For  this  purpose  choose  any  point  Pj  within  the  circle,  not  on  the  line 
PA.  We  know  the  value  of  the  function  and  all  its  derivates  at  Pj,  from 
the  series,  and  so  we  can  form  the  Taylor  series  (for  the  same  function) 
with  Pi  as  origin,  which  will  define  a  function  analytic  throughout  some 
circle  of  centre  Pj.  Now  this  circle  will  extend  as  far  as  the  singularity* 
which  is  nearest  to  P,,  which  may  or  not  be  A;  but  in  either  case,  this  new 
circle  will  usuallyf  lie  partly  outside  the  old  circle  of  convergence,  and  for 
points  in  the  region  which  is  included  in  the  new  circle  hut  not  in  the  old  circle,. 
the  new  series  may  he  used  to  define  the  values  of  the  function,  although  the 
old  series  failed  to  do  so. 

Similarly  we  can  take  any  other  point  P^,  in  the  region  for  which  the 
values  of  the  function  are  now  known,  and  form  the  Taylor  series  with  Pg 
as  origin,  which  will  in  general  enable  us  to  define  the  function  at  other 
points,  at  which  its  values  were  not  previously  known ;  and  so  on. 

This  process  is  called  continuation^.  By  means  of  it,  starting  from  a 
representation  of  a  function  by  any  one  power  series  we  can  find  any  number 
of  other  power  series,  which  between  them  define  the  value  of  the  function 
at  all  points  of  a  domain,  any  point  of  which  can  be  reached  from  P  without 
passing  through  a  singularity  of  the  function ;  and  the  aggregate  §  of  all 
the  power  series  thus  obtained  constitutes  the  analytical  expression  of  the 
function. 

It  is  impoi'tant  to  know  whether  continuation  by  two  different  PBQ,  PB'Q  paths  will 
give  the  same  final  power  series  ;  it  will  be  seen  that  this  is  the  case,  if  the  function 
have  no  singularity  inside  the  closed  curve  PBQB'P,  in  the  following  way :  Let  Pj  be  any 
point  on  PBQ,  inside  the  circle  C  with  centre  P  ;  obtain  the  continuation  of  the  function 
with  Pi  as  origin,  and  let  it  converge  inside  a  circle  Oj  ;  let  Pj'  be  any  point  inside  both 
circles  and  also  inside  the  curve  PBQB'P  ;  let  *S',  Si,  Si  be  the  poAver  series  with  P,  Pi, 
Pi'  as  origins  ;  then  1 1  aSj  =  Si  over  a  certain  domain  which  will  contain  Pi ,  if  P/  be  taken 
sufficiently  near  Pj  ;  and  hence  »S'i  will  be  the  continuation  of  Si  ;  for  if  Ti  were  the 
continuation  of  Si,  we  have  7\  =  Si  over  a  domain  containing  Pj,  and  so  (§  3-73) 
corresponding  coefficients  in  *S'i  and  7\  are  the  same.  By  carrying  out  such  a  process  a 
sufficient  number  of  times,  we  deform  the  path  PBQ  into  the  path  PB'Q  if  no  singular 
point  is  inside  PBQB'P.  The  reader  will  convince  himself  by  drawing  a  figure  that 
the  process  can  be  carried  out  in  a  finite  luimber  of  steps. 

*  Of  the  function  defined  by  the  new  series. 

i  The  word  'usually'  must  be  taken  as  referring  to  the  cases  which  are  likely  to  come 
under  the  reader's  notice  while  studying  the  less  advanced  parts  of  the  subject. 

X  French,  prolongement ;   German,  Fortsetznng . 

§  Such  an  aggregate  of  power  series  has  been  obtained  for  various  functions  by  M.  J.  M.  Hill, 
by  purely  algebraical  processes,  Proc.  Londo)i  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  xxxv.  (1903),  pp.  388  et  seq. 

II  Since  each  is  equal  to  S. 

W.   M.   A.  7 


98  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 


Example.     The  series 

1           Z          ^2          23 

represents  the  function 

f^'^  =  a-.z 

only  for  points  z  within  the  circle  |z|  =  ja|. 

But  any  number  of  other  power  series  exist,  of  the  type 

-  1,^-6         {z-hf      {z-hf  . 

a  _  6  +  (a  _  6)2  -^  (a  -  6)3  "^  (a  -  6)4  "^  •  ■  ■ ' 
if  hja  is  not  real  and  positive  these  converge  at  points  inside  a  circle  which  is  partly 
inside  and  partly  outside  |2|  =  |a|;   these  series  represent  this   same  function  at  points 
outside  this  circle. 

5  "SOI.     On  functions  to  xohich  the  continuation-process  cannot  he  applied. 
It  is  not  always  possible  to  carry  out  the  process  of  continuation.     Take  as  an  example 
the  function/ (2)  defined  by  the  power  series 

/(3)  =  l+2-'^  +  24  +  28  +  2l6+..,+22»+...^ 

which  clearly  converges  in  the  interior  of  a  circle  whose  radius  is  unity  and  whose  centre 
is  at  the  origin. 

Now  it  is  obvious  that,  as  2^1-0,  /(2)-^-f  x  ;  the  point  +1  is  therefore  a 
singularity  of/ (2). 

But  /(2)  =  22+/(22), 

and  if  22-»-l -0, /(22)-»-qo  and  so  f  (z) ->•  cc  ,  and  hence  the  points  for  which  2^=1  are 
singularities  of  f{z) ;  the  point  2=  -  1  is  therefore  also  a  singularity  of  f(z). 
Similarly  since 

/(2)  =  22  +  24+/(2*), 

we  see  that  if  2  is  such  that  2*=  1,  then  2  is  a  singularity  of  f(z) ;  and,  in  general,  any  root 
of  any  of  the  equations 

22  =  1,  24  =  1,  28=1,  2i6=l,  ..., 

is  a  singularity  of /(z).  But  these  points  all  lie  on  the  circle  |2|  =  1  ;  and  in  any  arc 
of  this  circle,  however  small,  there  are  an  unlimited  immber  of  them.  The  attempt  to 
carry  out  the  process  of  continuation  will  therefore  be  frustrated  by  the  existence  of  this 
unbroken  front  of  singularities,  beyond  which  it  is  impossible  to  pass. 

In  such  a  case  the  function  f{z)  cannot  be  continued  at  all  to  points  2  situated  outside 
the  circle  |2|  =  1  ;  such  a  function  is  called  a  lacunary  function,  and  the  circle  is  said  to  be 
a  limiting  circle  for  the  function. 

5'51.     The  identity  of  two  functions. 

The  two  series 

1+Z  +  z''  +  z'^-h  ... 

and  -1  4- (^-2) -(5 -2)-  + (2 -2)^ -(^-2)4+... 

do  not  both  converge  for  any  value  of  z,  and  are  distinct  expansions. 
Nevertheless,  we  generally  say  that  they  represent  the  same  function,  on  the 
strength  of  the  fact  that  they  can  both  be  represented  by  the  same  rational 

1 

expression     — —  . 


5-501 -5-6]     Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  99 

This  raises  the  question  of  the  identity  of  two  functions.  Under  what 
circumstances  shall  we  say  that  two  different  expansions  represent  the  same 
function  ? 

We  might  define  a  function  (after  Weierstrass),  by  means  of  the  last 
article,  as  consisting  of  one  power  series  together  with  all  the  other  power 
series  which  can  be  derived  from  it  by  the  process  of  continuation.  Two 
different  analytical  expressions  will  therefore  be  regarded  as  defining  the 
same  function,  if  they  represent  power  series  which  can  be  derived  from  each 
other  by  continuation. 

Since  if  a  function  is  analytic  (in  the  sense  of  Cauchy,  §  5*12)  at  and  near 
a  point  it  can  be  expanded  into  a  Taylor's  series,  and  since  a  convergent 
power  series  has  a  unique  differential  coefficient  (§  5"3),  it  follows  that  the 
definition  of  Weierstrass  is  really  equivalent  to  that  of  Cauchy. 

It  is  important  to  observe  that  the  limit  of  a  combination  of  analytic 
functions  can  represent  different  analytic  functions  in  different  parts  of  the 
plane.     This  can  be  seen  from  the  following  example. 

Consider  the  series 

1  /  1\       V    /  1\/      1  1 


The  sum  of  the  first  n  terms  of  this  series  is 

1      /        1\        1 


z      \        zj    l+z"" 

The  series  therefore  converges  for  all  values  of  z  (zero  excepted)  not  on  the 
circle  |  2;  j  =  1.  But,  as  ?i  -»-  00  ,  |  ^i*^  |  ^  0  or  |  ^"  |  -*  00  according  as  |  ^  j  is  less 
or  greater  than  unity ;  hence  we  see  that  the  sum  to  infinity  of  the  series  is 

z  when  J2;|<1,  and  -  when    J2'|>1.     This  series   therefore  represents  one 

function  at  points  in  the  interior  of  the  circle  \z\  =  l,  and  an  entirely  different 
function  at  points  outside  the  same  circle.  The  reader  will  see  from  §  5 '3 
that  this  result  is  connected  with  the  non-uniformity  of  the  convergence  of 
the  series  near  \z\  —  l. 


Z  Z''       z' 


Example.     Shew  that  the  series 
represent  the  same  function  in  the  common  part  of  their  domain  of  convei-gence. 


2    4    1     /    2^ 


5"6.     Laurent's  Theorem. 

A  very  important  theorem  was  published  in  1843  by  Laurent* ;  it  relates 
to  expansions  of  functions  to  which  Taylor's  Theorem  cannot  be  applied. 

*  Comptes  Rendus,  t.  xvii. 


100  THE    PROCESSES    OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

Let  C  and  C  be  two  concentric  circles  of  centre  a,  of  which  C"  is  the  inner ; 
and  let /(^)  be  a  function  which  is  analytic*  at  all  points  on  C  and  C  and 
throughout  the  annulus  between  C  and  C  Let  a  +  h  be  any  point  in  this 
ring-shaped  space.     Then  we  have  (§  5-21  corollary) 

where  the  integrals  are  supposed  taken  in  the  positive  or  counter-clockwise 
direction  round  the  circles. 
This  can  be  written 

1     r  (    1  h  h"'  A**"*"^  ) 

/(« + ^) = 2:;^- j  ^ /(^)  I JT^  +  (^3^.  +  •  •  •  +  (T^oT  1  +  (T-^^ 

We  find,  as  in  the  proof  of  Taylor's  Theorem,  that 

f(z)dz.h''+'  [    f(z)dz(z-aT+' 


c{2-  ay+'  {z-a-  K)  J  c   {z  -  a  -  h)  /i"+i 

tend  to  zero  as  w  ^  oc  ;  and  thus  we  have 

•  /         7  \  7  7  o  bi      bo 

y  ((t  +  h)  =  a-o  4-  ttj/i  4-  a^h^  +  ...  +  j  +  j^„  +  ..., 

where  t     «,,  =  ---.       j-^-Vn+i  and   6,,  =  -—.        (z  -  ay-' f(z)dz. 

This  result  is  Laurent's  Theorem ;  changing  the  notation,  it  can  be 
expressed  in  the  following  form:  If  f(z)  be  analytic  on  the  concentric  circles 
C  and  C  of  centre  a,  and  throughout  the  annulus  betiveen  them,  then  at  any 
point  z  of  the  annulus  f{z)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

f{z)  =  Oo  +  a^  (z  -  a)  +  a,  (z  -  af  +...+  -^jira)  ^  G-af  ^'"' 
where         «.  =  ^.j^^,  ^^,   and  b^.  =  ^,j^^,  (t  -  ar~' f  (t)  dt. 

An  important  case  of  Laurent's  Theorem  arises  when  there  is  only  one 
singularity  within  the  inner  circle  C,  namely  at  the  centre  a.  In  this  case 
the  circle  C  can  be  taken  as  small  as  we  please,  and  so  Laurent's  expansion 
is  valid  for  all  points  in  the  interior  of  the  circle  C,  except  the  centre  a. 

Example  1.     Prove  that 


;(-")=x 


(x)  +  zJ,  (x)  +  z'-J,  (.r)  +  . . .  +  s»/„  (,r)  + . . . 

-  „  -A  (,r)  +  -,  J.,  (x)  -...  +  ^  J    J,  (X)  +  . . 


1     f"^"' 
where  J^^  (.(;)  = --  coh  {nd  -  x  >ihi  6)  dd . 

■In  J  0 

*   See  §  5'2  corollary  2,  footnote. 

t  We  cannot  write  (;„=/(«)  («)/«  !  as  in  Taylor's  Theorem  since  /'(£)  is  not  necessarily  analytic 
inside  C". 


56]  Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  101 

For  tho  function  of  z  under  consideration  is  analytic  in  any  domain  which  does  not 
include  the  point  2  =  0  ;  and  so  by  Laurent's  Theorem, 

jH)  =  ao  +  ai2  +  a222  +  ...  +  ^  +  ^'  +  ..., 
and  where  G  and  C  are  any  circles  with  the  origin  as  centre.     Taking  C  to  be  the  circle  of 


radius  unity,  and  writing  2  =  e'*,  we  have 

1    r^"- 

1     r^"' 
=  ;r—  I      cos  {n6  -  X  sin  6)  d6, 

ZTT  J  0 

since  I      sin  hid  —  r  sin  6)  dd  vanishes,  as  may  be  seen  by  writing  27r  -(f)  for  B.     Thus 

Now  &n  =  (-)"«n»  since  the  function  expanded  is  unaltered  if  —  2"^  be  written  for  z. 
Thus 

which  completes  the  proof. 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  in  the  annulus  defined  by  |a|  <[2|  <  |ft|,  the  function 

h 


\{z-a)(b-z)\ 
can  be  expanded  in  the  form 


,                                    -,       "  1.3. ..(2^-1). 1.3.. .(2?  +  2n-l)/a\2 
where  8.,=  2 ^ojx  — 7  .^7 — Vi ij}' 


The  function  is  one-valued  and  analytic  in  the  annulus  (see  §  5'7),  for  the  branch-points 
0,  a  neutralise  each  other,  and  so,  by  Laurent's  Theorem,  if  C  denote  the  circle  |2|  =  ?*, 
where  |  a  |  <  /•  <  1 6 1 ,  the  coefficient  of  s"  in  the  required  expansion  is 

1      r    _dz_  ( bz         1  i 

27ri  j  cz'^*'^  \{z^){b - 2) j    * 

Putting  z=re^,  this  becomes 

-    I       ft-nitfr-nr/H\    I t>w  \ 

27 


i^J%_»«.-.rf«(l-;-e»)-*(l -%-»)-*, 


1      /'S' 

-_    I      e-ni0r-nde  2 
2n-  yo 


fc=o  2*./{:!  b"    iZo  2Kl\  r^      ' 

the  series  being  absolutely  convergent  and  uniformly  convergent  with  regard  to  B. 

The  only  terms  which  give  integrals  different  from  zero  are  those  for  which  k  =  l-\-n. 
So  the  coefficient  of  2"  is 


1    r^n-        1  r 

^  dB2   — 

2ir  J  Q  , 


3. ..(21-1)  1 .  3  ■..(2^-|-2?t-l)    g' 
6"* 


102  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

Similarly  it  Ccan  be  shewn  that  the  coefficient  of  -  is  .S^a". 

Example  3.     Shew  that 

e«  +  ''/«  =  ao  +  a,2  +  a222  +  ...  +  j  +  ^  +  ..., 

where  «„= —  I    "  e("*'"'^'^''^  GOii{{u-v)s,m  6-ne]dd, 

•Itt  J  0 

and  bn= —  |    '^e("  +  '')'=°'*cos  {(t;- w)  sin  ^-7i^}o?^. 

2rr  jo 

5"61.     The  nature  of  the  singularities  of  one-valued  functions. 

Consider  first   a   function  f{z)  which   is   analytic   throughout  a   closed 
region  S,  except  at  a  single  point  a  inside  the  region. 

Let  it  be  possible  to  define  a  function  ^  (z)  such  that 

(i)     (ji  (z)  is  analytic  throughout  S, 

(ii)     when   z  i=  a,  f{z)  =  (f){z)-\ ^~+/      ^  \2+-"  + 


z  —  a  '  (z  —  af  {z  —  ay^ 

Then  f(z)  is  said  to  have  a  'pole  of  order  n  at  a' ;  and  the  terms 
'    +  ^  +  ...  +  , ^i  are  called  the  principal  part  of  f(z)  near  a. 


z  —  a     {z  —  af      '"      (z  —  a)" 

By  the  definition  of  a  singularity  (§  5'12)  a  pole  is  a  singularity.     If  w  =  1, 

the  singularity  is  called  a  simple  pole. 

Any  singularity  of  a  one-valued  function  other  than  a  pole  is  called  an 
essential  singularity. 

If  the  essential  singularity,  a,  is  isolated  (i.e.  if  a  region,  of  which  a  is  an 
interior  point,  can  be  found  containing  no  singularities  other  than  a),  then  a 
Laurent  expansion  can  be  found,  in  ascending  and  descending  powers  of  a 
valid  when  A  >\z  —  a\>  B,  where  A  depends  on  the  other  singularities  of  the 
function,  and  B  is  arbitrarily  small.  Hence  the  '  principal  part '  of  a  function 
near  an  isolated  essential  singularity  consists  of  an  infinite  series. 

It  should  be  noted  that  a  pole  is,  by  definition,  an  isolated  singularity,  so 
that  all  singularities  which  are  not  isolated  (e.g.  the  limiting  point  of  a 
sequence  of  poles)  are  essential  singularities. 

There  does  not  exist,  in  general,  an  expansion  of  a  function  valid  near  a  non-isolated 
singularity  in  the  way  that  Laurent's  expansion  is  valid  near  an  isolated  singularity. 

CoroUaty.  If  /{z)  has  a  pole  of  order  n  at  a,  and  i|/-(2)  =  (2-«)"/(2)  {z^a\ 
y^{a)=\\xn{z  —  aYf{z),  then  y\r{z)  is  analytic  at  a. 

Example  1.     A  function  is  not  bounded  near  an  isolated  essential  singularity. 

[Trove  that  if  the  function  were  bounded  near  z  =  a,  the  coefficients  of  negative  powers 
of  :  — «  would  all  vanish.] 


561,  5-62]     Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  103 

c  z 

Example  2.     Find  the  singularities  of  the  function  6*~*/{e'*  —  1}. 

At  z  =  0,  the  numerator  is  analytic,  and  the  denominator  has  a  simple  zero.     Hence 
the  function  has  a  simple  pole  at  2  =  0. 

Similarly  there  is  a  simple  pole  at  each  of  the  points  2niria  (n=  ±1,  ±2,  ±3,  ...);  the 
denominator  is  analytic  and  does  not  vanish  for  other  values  of  z. 

At  z  =  a,  the  numerator  has  an  isolated  singularity,  so  Laurent's  Theorem  is  applicable, 
and  the  coefl&cients  in  the  Laurent  expansion  may  he  obtained  from  the  quotient 


z  —  a 


,3. 


IMz-af'^' 


/ -.     z  —  a 

e    1  + +... 

\  « 

which  gives  an  expansion  involving  all  positive  and  negative  powers  of  {z  —  a).  So  there  is 
an  essential  singularity  at  z  =  a. 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  function  defined  by  the  series 

I       ?t2»-l{(l+?i-l)"-l} 
„=l(0«-l){2»-(H-7i-i)»} 

has  simple  poles  at  the  points  2  =  (1 +  71-1)6^*^"/",     {k=Q,  1,  2,...  n-  1 ;  n=\,  2,  3,  ...). 

(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 

5*62.     The  'point  at  infinity.' 

The  behaviour  of  a  function  f{z)  as  \z\-*  cc  can  be  treated  in  a  similar 
way  to  its  behaviour  as  z  tends  to  a  finite  limit. 

If  we  write  z  =  -,  so  that  large  values  of  z  are  represented  by  small 

values  of  z'  in  the  ^^'-plane,  there  is  a  one-one  correspondence  between 
z  and  z',  provided  that  neither  is  zero ;  and  to  make  the  correspondence 
complete  it  is  sometimes  convenient  to  say  that  when  z'  is  the  origin,  z  is 
the  '  point  at  infinity.'  But  the  reader  must  be  careful  to  observe  that  this 
is  not  a  definite  point,  and  any  proposition  about  it  is  really  a  proposition 
concerning  the  point  z  =  0. 

Let  f{z)  =  ^  {z').  Then  <^  (/)  is  not  defined  at  z  =  0,  but  its  behaviour 
near  z  =0  is  determined  by  its  Taylor  (or  Laurent)  expansion  in  powers 
of  z  ;  and  we  define  <^  (0)  as  lim  ^  {z')  if  that  limit  exists.     For  instance 

the  function  ^{z')  may  have  a  zero  of  order  w  at  the  point  /  =  0;  in  this 
case  the  Taylor  expansion  of  ^  {z')  will  be  of  the  form 

and  so  the  expansion  of/(^)  valid  for  sufficiently  large  values  of  |  ^  j  will  be 

of  the  form 

A       JS  C 


/  \   )        ^m  "^  ^»n+i        2'""^" 


In  this  case,  f{z)  is  said  to  have  a  zero  of  order  m  at  '  infinity.' 


104  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

Again,  the  function  <f) (z)  may  have  a  pole  of  order  m  at  the  point  /  =  0  ; 
in  this  case 

^  u')  ^  A  +  _^  +  ^,  +  ...  +  ^  +  il/+  iV^/  +  Pz'  +  ...; 

and  so,  for  sufficiently  large  values  of  j  z\,f{z)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

N     P 

f{z)  =  Az'"  +  Bz'»-'  +  Cz"'-^  +  ...+Lz  +  M  +  -  +  -  +  .... 

In  this  case,  f(z)  is  said  to  have  a  pole  of  order  m  at  '  infinity.' 

Similarly  f(z)  is  said  to  have  an  essential  singularity  at  infinity,  if  <f)  (z) 

has  an  essential  singularity  at  the  point  z'  =  0.     Thus  the  function  &"  has  an 

1 
essential  singularity  at  infinity,  since  the  function  e^'  or 

1      J^  1 

^'^  z''^2\z~''^Slz'■''^'■^ 
hsiS  an  essential  singularity  at  z'  =  0. 

Example.     Discuss  the  function  represented  by  the  series 

2    — .  :, ^r~o5  (a>l). 

The  function   represented  by   this   series   has   singularities   at  z  =  —  and   z= , 

^  a^  a^ 

(m  =  l,  2,  3,  ...),  since  at  each  of  these  points  the  denominator  of  one  of  the  terms  in  the 

series  is  zero.     These  singularities  are  on  the  imaginary  axis,  and  have  2  =  0  as  a  limiting 

point ;  so  no  Taylor  or  Laurent  expansion  can  be  formed  for  the  function  valid  throughout 

any  region  of  which  the  origin  is  an  interior  point. 

For  values  of  z,  other  than  these  singularities,  the  series  converges  absolutely,  since  the 

limit  of  the  ratio  of  the  (?i  +  l)th  term  to  the  ?ith  is  Vmi  {n  +  1)- ^  a-'^  =  0.     The  function  is 

an  even  function  of  z  (i.e.  is  unchanged  if  the  sign  of  z  be  changed),  tends  to  zero  as 
1 2 1  -s-Qo ,  and  is  analytic  on  and  outside  a  circle  C  of  radius  greater  than  unity  and  centre 
at  the  origin.     So,  for  points  outside  this  circle,  it  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

22+24+2C  +  "-' 

where,  by  Laurent's  Theorem, 

Now  2     -p7 ^- ^,  =    2        2      , (_)mo,-2mn2-2m_ 

This  double  series  converges  absolutely  when  j  2  |  >  1,  and  if  it  be  rearranged  in  powers 
of  2  it  converges  uniformly. 

00    / \k  —  \fj,—  'ikn 

Since  the  coefficient  of  z~^  is   2 and  the  only  term  which  furnishes  a  non- 

zero  integral  is  the  term  in  z~^,  we  liave 

1        r        CO     (_)Jr-l„-2t,t  ^2 

^77?.  ;  (-  „=o  n  !  2 


5'63,  5  64]      Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  105 

Therefore,  when  \z\  >  1,  the  function  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 


ai        a*        a* 

e        e       e 


The  function  has  a  zero  of  the  second  order  at  infinity,  since  the  expansion  begins  with 
a  term  in  «~2, 

563.     Liouville's  Theorem*. 

Let  f{z)  he  analytic  for  all  values  of  z  and  let  \f{z)  \  <  K  for  all  values 
of  z,  where  K  is  a  constant  (so  that  \f(z)\  is  bounded  as  \z\^oo).  Then 
f(z)  is  a  constant. 

Let  z,  z'  be  any  two  points  and  let  C  be  a  contour  such  that  z,  z'  are 
inside  it.     Then,  by  §  521, 

/(^')-/(.)  =  5^./jf^,-fi-j/(f)<^f; 

take  C  to  be  a  circle  whose  centre  is  z  and  whose  radius  is  /a  ^  2  |  ^'  —  0  j ;  on 

0  write  ^=z  +  pe'^ ;  since  \^-  z'l'^^P  when  ^  is  on  C  it  follows  from  §  4-62 
that 


^2n  \z'  -z\  .  K 

27rJo  y 

<2\z-z\Kp-\ 
Make  /o  ^  oo  ,  keeping  z  and  /  fixed;  then  it  is  obvious  that  f{z')  —f{z)  =  0 ; 
that  is  to  say,  f(z)  is  constant. 

As  will  be  seen  in  the  next  article,  and  again  frequently  in  the  latter  half  of  this 
volume,  Liouville's  theorem  furnishes  short  and  convenient  proofs  for  some  of  the  most 
important  results  in  Analysis. 

5'64.     Functions  with  no  essential  singularities. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  the  only  one-valued  functions  which  have  no 
singularities,  except  poles,  at  any  point  (including  x  )  are  rational  functions. 

For  let  f(z)  be  such  a  function ;  let  its  singularities  in  the  finite  part 
of  the  plane  be  at  the  points  Ci,  Ca,  ...  Ck'.  and  let  the  principal  part  (§  5"61) 
of  its  expansion  at  the  pole  Cr  be 

Z  —  Cr       (Z  —  CrY        '"        (z  —  C^)"''  ' 

Let  the  principal  part  of  its  expansion  at  the  pole  at  infinity  be 

ttiZ  +  a^z^-\-  ...  +  a,i2"; 

if  there  is  not  a  pole  at  infinity,  then  all  the  coefficients  in  this  expansion 
will  be  zero. 

•  This  theorem  (first  published  in  1844  by  Cauchy,  Comptes  Rendus,  xix)  was  given  this  name 
by  Borchardt  (Crelle,  Lxxxviii),  who  heard  it  in  Liouville's  lectures  in  1847. 


106  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

Now  the  function 

f{z)-  S  |-^^  +  ^S2  +  --  +  r-^'vrl-«i^-«^^'----«-^" 

•^  ^   ^        r=l  V  -  Cr       {Z  -  CrY  {z  -  Crf^  j 

has  clearly  no  singularities  at  the  points  Ci,  Cg,  ...  Cu,  or  at  infinity;  it  is 
therefore  analytic  everywhere  and  is  bounded  as  \z\-*  qc  ,  and  so,  by 
Liouville's  Theorem,  is  a  constant;  that  is, 

/(.)=  C+a..  +  „,.'+ ... +a...+  I  j-«:;  +  ^-j^,+ ...  +  (-^"^  j  , 

where  C  is  constant;  f{z)  is  therefore  a  rational  function,  and  the  theorem  is 
established. 

It  is  evident  from  Liouville's  theorem  (combined  with  §  3'61  corollary  (ii)) 
that  a  function  which  is  analytic  everywhere  (including  oo  )  is  merely  a 
constant.  Functions  which  are  analytic  everywhere  except  at  x  are  of 
considerable  importance;  they  are  known  as  integral  functions* .  Examples 
of  such  functions  are  e^,  sin  z,  e*".  From  §  5*4  it  is  apparent  that  there  is  no 
finite  radius  of  convergence  of  a  Taylor's  series  which  represents  an  integral 
function ;  and  from  the  result  of  this  section  it  is  evident  that  all  integral 
functions  (except  mere  polynomials)  have  essential  singularities  at  oo  . 

5T.     Many-valued  functions. 

In  all  the  previous  work,  the  functions  under  consideration  have  had  a 
unique  value  (or  limit)  corresponding  to  each  value  (other  than  singularities) 
of  ^. 

But  functions  may  be  defined  which  have  more  than  one  value  for  each 
value  of  z ;  thus  \i  z  =  r  (cos  6  -^  i  sin  6),  the  function  z^  has  the  two  values 

ri  fcos  \d-\-iQm\d\,    r^  -jcos  \{d  +  27r)  +  i  sin  I  (6  +  27r)|- ; 

and  the  function  arc  tan  x  (x  real)  has  an  unlimited  number  of  values,  viz. 
Arc  tan  a;  +  WTT,  where  -  2  7r<  Arctana;<  2  tt  and  n  is  any  integer;  further 
examples  of  many-valued  functions  are  log  2^,  z~^,  sin(^^). 

Either  of  the  two  functions  which  z^  represents  is,  however,  analytic 
except  at  z  =  0,  and  we  can  apply  to  them  the  theorems  of  this  chapter ;  and 
the  two  functions  are  called  'branches  of  the  many-valued  function  zk' 
There  will  be  certain  points  in  general  at  which  two  or  more  branches 
coincide  or  at  which  one  branch  has  an  infinite  limit;  these  points  are  called 
'branch-points.'  Thus  ^i  has  a  branch-point  at  0;  and,  if  we  consider  the 
change  in  z^  as  z  describes  a  circle  counter-clockwise  round  0,  we  see  that  6 
French,  foiict ion  flntiere  ;  German,  (janze  Funktion. 


57]  TAYLOR'S,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  107 

increases  by  27r,  r  remains  unchanged,  and  either  branch  of  the  function  passes 
over  into  the  other  branch.  This  will  be  found  to  be  a  general  characteristic 
of  branch-points.  It  is  not  the  purpose  of  this  book  to  give  a  full  discussion 
of  the  properties  of  many-valued  functions,  as  we  shall  always  have  to 
consider  particular  branches  of  functions  in  regions  not  containing  branch- 
points, so  that  there  will  be  comparatively  little  difficulty  in  seeing  whether 
or  not  Cauchy's  Theorem  may  be  applied. 

Thus  we  cannot  apply  Cauchy's  Theorem  to  such  a  function  as  zi  when  the  path  of 
integration  is  a  circle  surrounding  the  origin ;  but  it  is  permissible  to  apply  it  to  one  of 

the  branches  of  z^  when  the  path  of  integration  is  like  that  shewn  in  §  6'24,  for  through- 
out the  contour  and  its  interior  the  function  has  a  single  definite  value. 

Example.  Prove  that  if  the  different  values  of  a*,  corresponding  to  a  given  value  of  z, 
are  represented  on  an  Argand  diagram,  the  representative  points  will  be  the  vertices  of  an 
equiangular  polygon  inscribed  in  an  equiangular  spiral,  the  angle  of  the  spiral  being 
independent  of  a. 

(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 

The  idea  of  the  different  branches  of  a  function  helps  us  to  understand  such  a  paradox 
as  the  following. 

Consider  the  function  y  =  xr^i 

for  which  '     -^  =  .r^(l -f-log.r). 

When  X  is  negative  and  real,  ~-  is  not  real.     But  if  x  is  negative  and  of  the  form 

Q  (where  p  and  q  are  positive  or  negative  integers),  y  is  real. 

Lq  +1 

If  therefore  we  draw  the  real  curve 

y=xF, 

we  have  for  negative  values  of  x  a  set  of  conjugate  points,  one  point  corresponding  to  each 
rational  value  of  x  with  an  odd  denominator ;  and  thus  we  might  think  of  proceeding  to 
form  the  tangent  as  the  limit  of  the  chord,  just  as  if  the  curve  were  continuous;  and 

thus  -—- ,  when  derived  from  the  inclination  of  the  tangent  to  the  axis  of  x,  would  appear 

to  be  real.     The  question  thus  arises,  Why  does  the  ordinary  process  of  differentiation 

give  a  non-real  value  for  -^  1   The  explanation  is,  that  these  conjugate  points  do  not  all 

arise  from  the  same  branch  of  the  function  y  =  x^.     We  have  in  fact 

y  =  g.r  log  X  +  Ikvix  ^ 

where  k  is  any  integer.  To  each  value  of  k  corresponds  one  branch  of  the  function  y. 
Now  in  order  to  get  a  real  value  of  y  when  x  is  negative,  we  have  to  choose  a  suitable 
value  for  k:  and  this  vahie  of  k  varies  as  we  go  from  one  conjugate  point  to  an  adjacent  one. 
So  the  conjugate  points  do  not  represent  values  of  y  arising  from  the  same  branch  of  the 

function  y  —  x^,  and   consequently  we   cannot   expect   the   value  of  -f^  when   evaluated 

for  a  definite  branch  to  be  given  by  the  tangent  of  the  inclination  to  the  axis  of  x  of  the 
line  joining  two  arbitrarily  close  members  of  the  series  of  conjugate  points. 


108  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

REFERENCES. 
E.  GoURSAT,  Cours  d' Analyse,  Chs.  xiv  and  xvi. 

J.  Hadamard,  La  Serie  de  Taylor  et  son  prolongement  analytique  (Scientia). 
E.  LiNDELOF,  Le  Calcul  des  Residus  (Borel  Tracts). 
C.  J.  DE  LA  Vall^e  Poussin,  Cours  d' Analyse  Infinitesimale,  Ch.  x. 
E.  Borel,  Lecons  sur  les  Fonctions  Entieres. 
G.  N.  Watson,  Complex  Integration  and  Camhy's  Theorem  (Camb.  Math.  Tracts). 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Obtain  the  expansion 

/(.)=/(a)  +  2|--/  (^-2--;+  23-731-^     V'2~;+2^.X!-^V~2~; +  •••]' 
and  determine  the  circumstances  and  range  of  its  validity. 

2.  Obtain,  under  suitable  circumstances,  the  expansion 

z-aV  .J        z-ci\      r,  {        3(0-a)l  ,,  f        (2m-l)  (z-a)!"] 

+  ....  •  (Corey.) 

3.  Shew  that  for  the  series 

1 

the  region  of  convergence  consists  of  two  distinct  areas,  namely  outside  and  inside  a  circle 

of  radius  unity,  and  that  in  each  of  these  the  series  represents  one  function  and  represents 

it  completely. 

(Weierstrass.) 

4.  Shew  that  the  function 

00 

11  =  0 

tends  to  infinity  as  .r-»-exp  {2nip/m  !)  along  the  radius  through  the  point ;  where  m  is  any 
integer  and  p  takes  the  values  0,  1,  2,  ...  {m\  -  1). 

Deduce  that  the  function  cannot  be  continued  beyond  the  unit  circle.  (Lerch.) 

5.  Shew  that,  if  2-  -  1  is  not  a  positive  real  number,  then 


1.3...(2»-1) 


2         2.4  2.4...27i 

(Jacobi  and  Scheibner.) 


Taylor's,  Laurent's  and  liouville's  theorems  109 

6.  Shew  that,  if  z—1  is  not  a  positive  real  number,  then 

m(m+l)  ...(m  +  n) ,,      ,        f^     ,-.      .      ,  , 
n\  Jo 

(Jacobi  and  Scheibner.) 

7.  Shew  that,  if  z  and  1  —  z  are  not  negative  real  numbers,  then 

^  Jo  m  +  l\   ^m+3     ^  {m  +  3)...(m  +  2n-l)  J 

+  ^^     '^        (m  +  l)(m  +  3)...(«i  +  2»-l)  Jo  ^       ^ 

(Jacobi  and  Scheibner.) 

8.  If,  in  the  expansion  of  (a  +  a^z  +  a2Z^)'"^  by  the  multinomial  theorem,  the  remainder 
after  n  terms  be  denoted  by  Rn  (z),  so  that 

(a  +  ai2+a2s2)'»=Jo  +  JiS  +  J22^+...+^»-i2"~^  +  /?»(2), 
shew  that 

R^iz)  =  ia  +  a,z+a,z^rj^  (,^1^,^,^,.)../  ^^- 

(Jacobi  and  Scheibner.) 

9.  If  {aQ  +  aiZ  +  a2z'^)-"^-'^  j    {aQ  +  a^t+aot^)"'dt 

J  0 

be  expanded  in  ascending  powers  of  z  in  the  form 

^12  +  ^2^^..., 

shew  that  the  remainder  after  (n  —  l)  terms  is 

{aQ  +  aiZ  +  a^z^)-"^-^  j    {aQ  +  ait  +  a^f^y^ {naQA^-{27n  +  7i  +  l) a2A^_it} (''-^ di. 
J  0 

(Jacobi  and  Scheibner.) 

10.  Shew  that  the  series 

2    {H-X„(2)e'}--J^^ 

Z~  3''  2™ 

where  ^n (2)= -1 +2-2I  +  3I -•••+(-)"— ,, 

and  where  ^(2)  is  analytic  near  2  =  0,  is  convergent  near  the  point  2=0  ;  and  shew  that  if 
the  sum  of  the  series  be  denoted  by/(2),  then/ (2)  satisfies  the  differential  equation 

/'(-')=/ (2) -0(2)-  (Pincherle.) 

11.  Shew  that  the  arithmetic  mean  of  the  squares  of  the  moduli  of  all  the  values  of 

the  series  2  a^z''   on   a   circle  |2|  =  r,  situated  within   its  circle   of  convergence,  is  equal 

0 
to  the  sum  of  the  squares  of  the  moduli  of  the  separate  terms. 

(Gutzmer.) 

12.  Shew  that  the  series 

i    c--('"»)i2'»-i 
111= I 


110  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  V 

converges  when  \z\  <  1;  and  that,  when  a  >  0,  the  function  which  it  represents  can  also 
be  represented  when  |2|  <  1  by  the  integral 


(S)- 


~  3    f 

0   e"  -z  xii 


and  that  it  has  no  singularities  except  at  the  point  2=1. 

(Lerch,  Monatshefte  fur  Math,  und  Phys.  vili.) 

13.  Shew  that  the  series 

2  _        2       f z_ z^ 1 

-{z+z     )+^  2  |^i_2„_2,/'2i)(2i/  +  2i/'2i')2'*'(l-2i/-2./'2-ii)(2i'  +  2i/'2-ii)2|  ' 

in  which  the  summation  extends  over  all  integral  values  of  v,  v\  except  the  combination 
(j/  =  0,  ^'  =  0),  converges  absolutely  for  all  values  of  z  except  purely  imaginary  values;  and 
that  its  sum  is  +1  or  -  1,  according  as  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive  or  negative. 

(Weierstrass.) 

14.  Shew  that  sin  |  m[ 2  +  -  1  [  can  be  expanded  in  a  series  of  the  type 


o  ^1         ^2 

ao  +  ai2  +  «22  +...  +  -  +  -2  +  . 


in  which  the  coefficients,  both  of  2"  and  of  z   ",  are 

1   r2T 

;r—  I       sin  (2  m  cos  6)  cos  tiddd. 
2Tr  J  0 

shew  that  f{z)  is  finite  and  continuous  for  all  real  values  of  z,  but  cannot  be  expanded  as 
a  Maclaurin's  series  in  ascending  powers  of  z ;  and  explain  this  a^jparent  anomaly. 


CHAPTER  VI 

THE  THEOEY  OF   EESIDUES  ;  APPLICATION  TO  THE  EVALUATION  OF 

DEFINITE   INTEGRALS 

6*1.     Residues. 

If  the  function  f{z)  has  a  pole  of  order  m  aX  z=-a,  then,  by  the  definition 
of  a  pole,  an  equation  of  the  form 

where  <f>  (z)  is  analytic  near  and  at  a,  is  true  near  a. 

The  coefficient  a_i  in  this  expansion  is  called  the  residue  of  the  function 
f(z)  relative  to  the  pole  a. 

Consider  now  the  value  of  the  integral    I  f(z)dz,  where  the  path  of 

integration  is  a  circle*  a,  whose  centre  is  the  point  a  and  whose  radius  p  is  so 
small  that  (/>  (z)  is  analytic  inside  and  on  the  circle. 

f     .  ''^^         f       dz  f 

We  have  I  f{z)  dz  =  ^  a^r  I    ; — ' — w  +1    4>  (■^)  dz. 

J  a  r  =  m  J  a  \^  (^)  J  a 

Now  1    (f)  (z)  dz  =  0  hy  ^  5  2  ;  and  (putting  z  —  a  =  pe^)  we  have,  if  r  ^jfe  1, 

J  a 

L{z-aY     Jo     p'-e'^'       ^        Jo  ^        LI -'•Jo 

But,  when  ?'  =  1,  we  have 

JaZ-a     Jo 
Hence  finally  /    f  (z)  dz  =  27ria_i. 

J  a 

Now  let  C  be  any  contour,  containing  in  the  region  interior  to  it  a  number 
of  poles  a,h,  c,  ...  of  a  function  f{z),  with  residues  a_i,  6_i,  c_i,  ...  respec- 
tively :  and  suppose  that  the  function  f{z)  is  analytic  throughout  G  and  its 
interior,  except  at  these  poles. 

*  The  existence  of  such  a  circle  is  implied  in  the  definition  of  a  pole  as  an  isolated 
singularity. 


112  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 

Surround  the  points  a,b,  c,  ...  by  circles  a,  /3,  7,  ...  so  small  that  their 
respective  centres  are  the  only  singularities  inside  or  on  each  circle ;  then  the 
function /(2')  is  analytic  in  the  closed  region  bounded  by  C,  a,  /3,  7,  .... 

Hence,  by  §  5"2  corollary  3, 

f   f(z)dz=(  f{z)dz+!  f{z)dz+... 

=  27rm_i  +  27ri6_i  +  — 

Thus  we  have  the  theorem  of  residues,  namely  that  if  f{z)  he  analytic 
throughout  a  contour  C  and  its  interior  except  at  a  number  of  poles  inside  the 
contour,  then 

\    f{z)dz=2'7ri'ER, 

J  c 

where  %R  denotes  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  the  function  f(z)  at  those  of  its 
poles  which  are  situated  within  the  contour  C. 

This  is  an  extension  of  the  theorem  of  §  5'21. 

Note.     If  a  is  a  simple  pole  oi  f{z)  the  residue  of  f{z)  at  that  pole  is  lim  {{z  —  a)f{z)]. 

6"2.     The  evaluation  of  definite  integrals. 

We  shall  now  apply  the  result  of  §  Ql  to  evaluating  various  classes 
of  definite  integrals ;  the  methods  to  be  employed  in  any  particular  case  may 
usually  be  seen  from  the  following  typical  examples. 

6'21.  The  evaluation  of  the  integrals  of  certain  periodic  functions  taken 
between  the  limits  0  and  tir. 


An  integral  of  the  type 


2Tr 


R  (cos  d,  sin  6)  dd, 


where  the  integrand  is  a  rational  function  of  cos  6  and  sin  6  finite  on  the 
range  of  integration,  can  be  evaluated  by  writing  e^^  =  2^ ;  since 

cos  d  =  -^{z  +  z~^),       sin  6  =  ~.{z  —  z~'^), 

the  integral  takes  the  form        S  (z)  dz,  where  S  (z)  is  a  rational  function  of  z 

■  c 

finite  on  the  path  of  integration  C,  the  circle  of  radius  unity  whose  centre  is 
the  origin. 

Therefore,  by  §  G'l,  the  integral  is  equal  to  ^-ni  times  the  sum  of  the  residues 
if  S  (z)  at  those  of  its  poles  ivhich  are  inside  that  circle. 

Example  1.     If  0  <  p  <  1, 

'2'^  cie  f  dz 


0       l-2pcOs6+p'^         J  (;l{l  -pz)  {Z—p)' 


6-2-6"22]  THE  THEORY   OF   RESIDUES  118 

The  only  pole  of  the  integrand  inside  the  circle  is  a  simple  pole  at  /? ;  and  the  residue 
there  is 

lim    "^ ^ 


Hence 


d6  27r 


tin 


2p  cos  6  +p'^     \—p^ 
Example  2.     If  0  <  jo  <  1, 

jo    1  - 229 cos 26  +p^   "^      J  c  iz  Vi     ^ 2  ^     ;    (1  -pz^)  (1  -pz-^) 
—  27r2R, 

where  2R  denotes  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  ,  .  ,/ :;—-, r  at  its  poles  inside  C :  these 

42°  ( 1  —pz^)  {z^-p)  • 

poles  are  0,  -pa  pi  ■  and  the  residues  at  them  are ,  ,       ,  jt^-t^ — -s^,  ^r^, — -:k  5 

'^  4p3  8p^{l-p^)    8p^{l—p^) 

and  hence  the  integral  is  equal  to 

ir(l-p+p^) 
1  —p 

k    Example  3.     If  71  be  a  positive  integer, 

[  ^^  e""*' "  cos  (m^  -  sin  ^)  rf^  =  ^ ,       P"  6*^°' "  sin  {nO  -8md)de= 0. 

Example  4.     U  a  >  b  >  0, 

p'^ dd  _      27ra  p'T  d6  _7r(2a  +  b) 

Jo    (a  +  bcosef     (a2-62)t'     h    (a  +  bcos'^ef     a^{a+b)^' 

6*22.     The   evaluation   of  certain  types   of  integrals  taken   between   the 
limits  —  00  and  +  00  . 

We  shall  now  evaluate   I       Q  (x)  dx,  where  Q  {z)  is  a  function  such  that 

(i)  it  is  analytic  when  the  imaginary  part  of  z  is  positive  or  zero  (except  at  a 

finite  number  of  poles),  (ii)  it  has  no  poles  on  the  real  axis  and  (iii)  as  1 2^  |  ^  00  , 

zQ  {z)  -*  0  uniformly  for  all  values  of  arg  z  such  that  0  ^  arg  z-^ir;  provided 

that   (iv)   when   x   is   real,   a;Q(«)-*0,  as  x^±<X),   in  such   a   way*    that 
ro 
Q  (x)  dx  and  I       Q  (x)  dx  both  converge. 


/, 


0 

Given  e,  we  can  choose  p^  (independent  of  arg  2^)  such  that  \zQ{z)\  <  ejir 
whenever  \z\>  p^  and  0  ■>  arg  z  ^  it. 

Consider       Q  {z)  dz  taken  round  a  contour  C  consisting  of  the  part  of  the 
J  c 
real  axis  joining  the  points  ±  p  (where  p  >  po)  and  a  semicircle  F,  of  radius  p, 
having  its  centre  at  the  origin,  above  the  real  axis. 

*  The  condition  xQ  (x)-^O  is  not  in  itself  sufficient  to  secure  the  convergence  of  I      Q{x)  dx; 
consider  Q  (x)  =  (x  log  x)~^. 

W.    M.  A.  8 


114  THE   PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 

Then,  by  §6-1,  [  Q{z)dz=  2iril.R,  where  2E  denotes  the  sum  of  the 
residues  oi  Q{z)  at  its  poles  above  the  real  axis*. 

Therefore  If  Q{z)dz-2TritR\  =  \\  Q(z)dz  . 

\J  -p  \         \JT 

In  the  last  integral  write  z  =  pe^^,  and  then 

f  Q(z)dz  =    r  Q{pe^)pe^Hde 
Jt  J  a 

<  r(€/7r)dd 
Jo 

=  €, 

by  §  4-62. 

Hence  lim  /     Q  (z)  dz  =  2^"^ R. 

P~^odJ  — p 

But    the    meaning    of    /       Q  (x)  dx    is       lim    I     Q  {x)  dx ;    and    since 
lim  I    Q  (x)  dx  and  lim  |      Q  (x)  dx   both   exist,  this   double   limit   is   the 

O-^CdJO  p-»-OD  j    -p 

same  as   lim  I     Q{x)dx. 

p-^-oo  J  — p 

Hence  we  have  proved  that 

f"    Q{x)dx  =  2'!ritR. 

J  —to 

This  theorem  is  particularly  useful  in  the  special  case  when  Q{a;)  is  a 
rational  function. 

[Note.     Even  if  condition  (iv)  is  not  satisfied,  we  still  have 

f    {Q(x)  +  Q{-x)}dx=lim    I      Q  (x)  dx=27ri2R.] 

J  0  p-*=o  J  -  p 


Example  1.     The  only  pole  of  {z^  +  l)-^  in  the  upper  half  plane  is  a  pole  at  2:=t  with 

dx  3 


3 

residue  there  -  ^^  i.     Therefore 
lb 


/: 


(x^  +  lf      8 
Example  2.     If  a  >  0,  6  >  0,  shew  that 

r°°        x'^dx 


•  Example   3.     By   integrating    \e~^^^dz   round    a    parallelogram    whose    corners    are 
-  R,  R,  R-\-  ai,  -  R  +  ai  a,nd  making  /?  -*  co ,  shew  that,  if  X  >  0,  then 

I        e->^x''coH{2\nx)dx  =  e-'"^'- j       e->^x- dx  =  2X~i  e->^<^''  j      e-^^dx. 

*   Q  (z)  lias  no  poles  above  the  real  axis  outside  the  contour. 


6-221,  6-222] 


THE  THEORY.  OF   RESIDUES 


115 


6*221.     Certain  infinite  integrals  involving  sines  and  cosines. 
If  Q  (z)  satisfies  the  conditions  (i),  (ii)  and  (iii)  of  §  6*22,  and  m  >  0,  then 
Q  (z)  e"*"  also  satisfies  those  conditions. 

Hence  f    {Q  (x)  e'^*' +  Q  (- x)  e-^^]  dx  is  equal  to  27ril>R',  where  IR 
Jo 

means  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  Q  (z)  e™*^  at  its  poles  in  the  upper  half  plane; 
and  so 


(i)     If  Q  (x)  is  an  even  function,  i.e.  if  Q(—  x)  =  Q  (x), 

I     Q  (x)  cos  (thx)  dx  =  TriXR'. 
Jo 

(ii)     If  Q  (x)  is  an  odd  function, 

Q  (x)  sin  (mx)  dx  =  tt^R'. 


f 

Jo 


6*222.     Jordan's  lemma*. 

The  results  of  §6*221  are  true  if  Q{z)  be  subject  to  the  less  stringent 
condition  Q{z)^0  uniformly  when  0  ^  arg  z^  tt  as  |  ^^  |  -»  oo  in  place  of  the 
condition  zQ{z)--0  uniformly. 

To  prove  this  we  require  a  theorem  known  as  Jordan's  lemma,  viz. 

If  Q(z)-*-0  uniformly  with  regard  to  arg  z  as  \z\^oo  when  0  ^ arg z^ir, 
and  if  Q (z)  is  analytic  when  both  \  z\  >  c  {a  constant)  and  0  ^  arg z  "^tt,  then 


lim  (       e'^'^Q(z)dz)=0, 

where  T  is  a  semicircle  of  radius  p  above  the  real  axis  with  centre  at  the  origin. 
Given  e,  choose  po  so  that  |  Q  (^)  |  <  e/ir  when  \z\  >  p^  and  0  ^  arg z  ■^tt] 
then,  if  p  >  poj 


/. 


e^^''Q{z)dz 


gmi(pcosfl+tpsin9)  Q  {pe'">)  pe^« idd 


But  le^itpcosoi  =  1^  and  so 

e'^i''Q{z)dz 


L 


<  I     {e/'Tr)pe-'^p^''^^d6 
Jo 

=  (2e/7r)        pe-'^'o^'^Hd. 
Jo 


Now  sin  6  ^  lOjir,  whenf  0  ^  6  ^^ir,  and  so 


/. 


e'^^'^Q  {z)  dz 


<  (2e/7r)  f     pe-^^p^l^ 
Jo 


dd 


<  {2e/'rr)  .  (7r/2m)     -  g-^'^pe/'r 


0 


<  ejm. 
*  Jordan,  Cours  d' Analyse,  t.  ii.  §  270. 

t  This  inequality  appears  obvious  when  we  draw  the  graphs  y^sinx,  y  =  2xlw\  it  may  be 
proved  by  shewing  that  (sin  6)16  decreases  as  6  increases  from  0  to  ^tt. 

« 0 


116  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 

Hence  lim   f   e'^^Q(z)dz  =  0. 


p- 
This  result  is  Jordan's  lemma. 

Now 


f "  {e'»^Q  (x)  +  e-'^^Q  (-  a;)]  da;  =  2'jriXR'  -  f   e'^^Q  (e)  dz, 
Jo  •'  r 

and,  making  p-*'  ao  ,  we  see  at  once  that 

r  {e'^^^'Q  (x)  +  e-'^^'^Q  (-  x)}  dx  =  liritR', 
Jo 

which  is  the  result  corresponding  to  the  result  of  §  6-221. 
Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  a  >  0,  then 


/: 


cos  a;    ,       TT 

ax=  — -e"". 


Example  2.     Shew  that,  if  a  ^  0,  6^0,  then 


/: 


cos  2a^  -  cos  26a;  ,  ,,       , 
2 ax=  TT  (o  -  a). 


(Take  a  contour  consisting  of  a  large  semicircle  of  radius  p,  a  small  semicircle  of 
radius  8,  both  having  their  centres  at  the  origin,  and  the  parts  of  the  real  axis  joining  their 
ends ;  then  make  p  -♦-  oo  ,  8  -»-  0.) 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  if  6  >  0,  m  ^  0,  then 

j  0  {xU^^f  ^^^  ^^'^^ ^  "^^W  *^^^  -a^-mh  (362  +  «2)}, 

Example  4.     Shew  that,  if  ^  >  0,  a  >  0,  then 

'  X  sin  ax 


/, 


q     ,„  dx=hive' 
0    A'-'  +  Z:^ 

Example  5.     Shew  that,  if  m  ^  0,  a  >  0,  then 


/ 


(Take  the  contour  of  example  2.) 

Example  6.     Shew  that,  if  the  real  part  of  z  be  positive, 

/     {e-i-e-t^)—=\ogz. 
J  i)  t 

[We  have 


-dt 


lim         /["^'^..["^-''^ 

-O.p^oc    lyS     ^  J  Sz     U  J 

{/rT*-/:?*}. 

since  i!-i  e-<  is  analytic  inside  the  quadrilateral  whose  corners  are  8,  8z,  pz,  p. 


«-*-0,p- 

—        lim 


6*23,  6*24]  THE  THEORY   OF   RESIDUES  117 

f  pz 
Now  /     t-^e-^dt-^O&s  p-t-ao  when  B(t)>0;  and 

fsz        ,   .       r«« 

/     t-U-tdt=\ogz-  j     t-^{l-e-i)dt-^logz, 
since  <-i(l-e-')-*l  as  «-*0.] 

6 '23.     Principal  voUues  of  integrals. 

It  was  assumed  in  §§  6'22,  6-221,  6-222  that  the  function  Q{x)  had  no  poles  on  the  real 
axis ;  if  the  function  has  a  finite  number  of  simple  poles  on  the  real  axis,  we  can  obtain 
theorems  corresponding  to  those  already  obtained,  except  that  the  integrals  are  all  principal 
values  (§  4-5)  and  2^  has  to  be  replaced  by  2R  +  ^2Rq,  where  2^  means  the  sum  of 
the  residues  at  the  poles  on  the  real  axis.  To  obtain  this  result  we  see  that,  instead  of 
the  former  contour,  we  have  to  take  as  contour  a  circle  of  radius  p  and  the  portions  of  the 
real  axis  joining  the  points 

-p,  a-8i;    a+8i,  b-82;     b  +  82,  c-83,  ... 

and  small  semicircles  above  the  real  axis  of  radii  81,  82,  ...  with*  centres  a,b,c,...,  where 
a,b,c,...  are  the  poles  of  Q{z)  on  the  real  axis;  and  then  we  have  to  make  Si,  82 >  ...-^0; 
call  these  semicircles  yi,  y2>  ••••     Then  instead  of  the  equation 

j  ^   Q(z)  dz+  /    Q  (z)  dz  =  2iri2R, 
we  get  P  I     Q{z)dz  +  ^  lira    [     Q{z)dz+       Q{z)  dz=2iri2B. 

Let  a'  be  the  residue  of  Q  (z)  at  a ;  then  writing  z=a  +  8ieio  on  y^  we  get 
f    Q{z)dz=  rQ{a+8ieiO)8ieiHdd. 

J  yi  J  IT 

But  $(a+8ie»"^)Sie»*-^a' uniformly  as  Si-*-0;  and  therefore  lim  1  Q{z)dz=  —nia' ; 
we  thus  get 

P  r     Q(z)dz+j     Q{z)  dz=2Tri2R  +  niSRo, 

and  hence,  using  the  arguments  of  §  6-22,  we  get 

pf     Q{x)dx=2viC2R+^2Ro). 

J     -QO 

The  reader  will  see  at  once  that  the  theorems  of  §§  6-221,  6-222  have  precisely  similar 
generalisations.  ^ 

The  process  employed  above  of  inserting  arcs  of  small  circles  so  as  to  diminish  the  area 
of  the  contour  is  called  indenting  the  contour. 


6"24.     Evaluation  of  integrals  of  the  form        x^  ^Q  {x)  dx. 

Jo 

Let  Q(x)  be  a  rational  function  of  x  such  that  it  has  no  poles  on  the 
positive  part  of  the  real  axis  and  af'Q{x)-»-0  both  when  x--0  and  when 
x-*-  00 . 


118  THE  PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 


ure 


Consider  1  (—  zf-^  Q  (z)  dz  taken  round  the  contour  C  shewn  in  the  fig 

consisting  of  the  arcs  of  circles  of  radii 
p,  8  and  the  straight  lines  joining  their 
end  points ;  (—  z)"'~^  is  to  be  interpreted 
as 

exp{(a-l)log(-^)} 
and 

log  (-  ^)  =  log  j  ^  i  +  *  arg  (-  z), 
where        —  tt  ^  arg  (—  z)  ^  tt  ; 
with  these  conventions  the  integrand  is 
one-valued  and  analytic  on  and  within 
the  contour  save  at  the  poles  of  Q  (z). 

Hence  if  'Zr  denote  the  sum  of  the 
residues  of  (—  zY'^  Q  (z)  at  all  its  poles, 

[  (_  zf-i  Q  (z)  dz  =  liritr. 
J  c 

On  the  small  circle  write  —z  =  8e^*,  and  the  integral  along  it  becomes 

—  I      {—zYQ{z)idd,  which  tends  to  zero  as  h-*-0. 

■J  n 

On  the  large  semicircle  write  —  z  =  pe^^,  and  the  integral  along  it  becomes 

—  I      (—  zY  Q  (z)  idd,  which  tends  to  zero  as  p  -»•  oo . 

On  one  of  the  lines  we  write  —  z  =  x&'^,  on  the  other  —  z-=  xe~^^  and 
(_^)a-i  becomes  a;«-^e*  <«-!'''*. 

Hence 

lim        \    {fl:;«-i6i-(«-i)'^Q  {x)  -  a;«-ie<«-^"^*Q  {x)\  dx  =  ^iritr ; 

(S-*-0,  p-*-oo)  J  8 

/•OO 

and  therefore  1    af-^Q{x)dx  =  '7r  coBec{a'ir)%r. 

Jo 

Corollary.     If  Q  (x)  have  a  number  of  simple  poles  on  the  positive  part 
of  the  real  axis,  it  may  be  shewn  by  indenting  the  contour  that 

P  1    x^-'^  Q  (x)  dx  =  7r  cosec  (air)  Xr  —  ir  cot  (a7r)  Xr', 

where  tr'  is  the  sum  of  the  residues  o{z^-^Q(z)  at  these  poles. 
Example  1.     If  0  <  a  <  1, 

I      f—:^a.T=Tr  cosec  an,      PI o?*- =  tt  cot  ajr. 


63,  6*31]  THE  THEORY   OF   RESIDUES  119 

Example  2.     If  0  <  «  <  1  aud  —  tt  <  a  <  jt, 


/: 


«   f  +  e*"  sin  TTZ 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  if  - 1  <  a  <  3,  then 


^»-l  „gi(»-l)a 

cfe = — ^. .  (M  inding. ) 


/: 


^  ,<&="('-'' 


0  (1 +0^2)2  Acos^itz' 

Example  4.     Shew  that,  if  -  1  <  jo  <  1  and  -  tt  <  X  <  tt,  then 

x~^dx        _      TT      sinjoX 


y  0 


(Elder.) 


0    \+2x cos \-\-x^     sin /jtt    sin X 
6*3.     Cauckifs  integral. 

We  shall  next  discuss  a  class  of  contour-integrals  which  are  sometimes  found  useful 
in  analytical  investigations. 

Let  Cbe  a  contour  in  the  2-plane,  and  let  /(«)  be  a  function  analytic  inside  and  on  C 
Let  0  (2)  be  another  function  which  is  analytic  inside  and  on  C  except  at  a  finite  number 
of  poles;  let  the  zeros  of  ^(2)  in  the  interior*  of  Cbe  ai,  a^,  ...,  and  let  their  degrees  of 
multiplicity  be  rj,  /•2,  ... ;  and  let  its  poles  in  the  interior  of  Cbe  61,  h^,  ...,  and  let  their 
degrees  of  multiplicity  be  «i,  S2)  •••• 

Then,  by  the  fundamental  theorem  of  residues,  - — .  /     fiz)  \  //  dz  is  equal  to  the  sum 

27nJ  c-^       <t>{z) 

of  the  residues  of       !;,     -  at  its  poles  inside  C. 
(t>{z) 

Now      1T\      ^^"  have  singularities  only  at  the  poles  and  zeros  of  </>  (2).     Near  one 

of  the  zeros,  say  aj ,  we  have 

(f){z)==A  {z-ai)r,  +  B(z-ai)rL+l  +  .... 
Therefore  0' (2)  =  Jrj  (2-ai)»-i-i  +  5(ri  +  l)(2-ai)n  +  ..., 

and  /(2)=/(«i)+(^-«i)/'(«i)  +  .... 

Therefore  \^^^  -  '-^^^^l  is  analytic  at  a,. 
\     (f>{z)  z-ai  j  ^ 

Thus  the  residue  of       jjs      ,  at  the  point  z  =  ai,  is  ri/(ai). 
Similarly  the  residue  at  2  =  61  is  —Sif{bi) ;  for  near  z  =  bi,  we  have 

0(2)  =  (7(2-6i)-».-|-Z)(2-5i)-»i  +  l-i-..., 

and  f{z)=f{W)  +  (z-b,)f'{br)+..., 

so  ^^'l  f}'^  +  '^  is  analytic  at  b,. 
(^(2)      ^   2-61  ^  ^ ^ 

Hence  -^.  f  /(2)  ^^  c^2  =  2/-i/(a,)-2«i/(fei), 

2ni  J  c  9(2) 

the  summations  being  extended  over  all  the  zeros  and  poles  of  <^  (2). 

6 "SI.     The  number  of  roots  of  an  equation  contained  within  a  contour. 
The  result  of  the  preceding  paragraph  can  be  at  once  applied  to  find  how  many  roots  of 
an  equation  cf){z)  =  0  lie  within  a  contour  C. 

For,  on  putting  f{z)=l  in  the  preceding  result,  we  obtain  the  result  that 

1  (  *-(^)^, 


2TriJ  C(f)iz) 

is  equal  to  the  excess  of  the  number  of  zeros  over  the  number  of  poles  of  (f)  (2)  contained  in 
the  interior  of  C,  each  pole  and  zero  being  reckoned  according  to  its  degree  of  multiplicity. 

*  <p(z)  must  not  have  any  zeros  or  poles  on  C. 


120  THE  PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 

Example  1.     Shew  that  a  polynomial  <^  (2)  of  degree  m  has  m  roots. 
Let  <^(2)  =  ao2'"+«i2'""^  + •••  +  «>«,     («o=f=0). 

^)  ^ maog"'-H...+«m-i 
•^^^  </)(25  ao2'»+. ..  +  «,„       ' 

Consequently,  for  large  values  of  [s], 

(^  (2)       2  \z^J 

Thus,  if  C  be  a  circle  of  radius  p  whose  centre  is  at  the  origin,  we  have 

_L,f  ■ma.^i  *  +  J-.f  of^)*,™^!^  ofi)*. 

But,  as  in  §  6-22,  f   0  (^^  dz^O 

as  p-t-cc  ;   and  hence  as  (f)  (2)  has  no  poles  in  the  interior  of  C,  the  total  number  of 
zeros  of  (f>{z)  is 

lim   — — .  /       ,  ,  ,  az=m. 


p^^  2iri  J  c  (j)  (2) 
Example  2.     If  at  all  points  of  a  contour  C  the  inequality 

is  satisfied,  then  the  contour  contains  k  roots  of  the  equation 
a,„2'"  +  a„j_i2"''-i  +  ..,+ai2  +  ao  =  0. 
For  write  /(2)  =  a,„2'"  +  a„_i2'"-i  +  ...+ai2  +  ao. 

Then  /(2)  =  a,2^  ^^^a^2»^  +  ...-f  %.,2^^^.t.^^_^,.-i  +  .„+^^ 

=  a,2''(l  +  C^), 

where  |  fj  ^a  <  1  on  the  contour,  a  being  independent*  of  2. 

Therefore  the  number  of  i-oots  of  /  (2)  contained  in  C 

_  J_  /"    /lii)  ^  _  _1_  /■    /^'  ,  ^_  ^\  ^ 
~  27ri  J  a  fiz)  27riJcVl+UdzJ  "*'■ 

f    dz 
But  I     —  =  27ri;  and,  since  |  f/"!  <  1,  we  can  expand  (1 +  £/■)-!  in  the  uniformly  con- 
vergent series 

Therefore  the  number  of  roots  contained  in  C  is  equal  to  k. 
Example  3.     Find  how  many  roots  of  the  equation 

2«  +  62+10  =  0 

lie  in  each  quadrant  of  the  Argand  diagram.  (Clare,  1900.) 

•  I  17  1  is  a  coutinuous  function  of  2  on  C,  and  so  attains  its  upper  bound  (§  3-62).     Hence  its 
upper  bound  a  must  be  less  than  1. 


6'4]  THE  THEORY   OF   RESIDUES  121 

6*4.     Connexion  between  the  zeros  of  a  function  and  the  zeros  of  its  derivate. 

Macdonald*  has  shewn  that  if  f{z)  he  a  function  of  z  analytic  throughout  the  interior  of 
a  single  closed  contour  G,  defined  hy  the  equation  \f{z)\  =  M,  where  M  is  a  constant,  then  the 
number  of  zeros  of  f{z)  in  this  region  exceeds  the  number  of  zeros  of  the  derived  function 
f'{z)  in  the  same  region  hy  unity. 

On  C  let  f{z)  =  JKei^;  then  at  points  on  C 

Hence,  by  §  6*31,  the  excess  of  the  number  of  zeros  of  f{z)  over  the  number  of  zeros 
of  f  (z)  inside  t  C  is 

_L    [    IMrf.        J-    [    f-^d.-       J-    [     f^/'^\^. 

2»ri  J  c  f(z)       "  27r^•  j  cf  {z)  2W  j  c  Wl  dz)  '*'• 

Let  s  be  the  arc  of  C  measured  from  a  fixed  point  and  let  \/r  be  the  angle  the  tangent  to 
C  makes  with  Ox ;  then 

1     /•    /rf2^  Id6\  _,  1    r      d6^ 

-^ijc  Kd^ldz) ^^=  -  2^-rS  dz\c 

1  r,    de  ,    dz~\ 

d6 

Now  log  -r-  is  purely  real  and  its  initial  value  is  the  same  as  its  final  value  ;   and 

dz 
log-j-  =  i-^;  hence  the  excess  of  the  number  of  zeros  oi  f{z)  over  the  number  of  zeros  of 

/'  (2)  is  the  change  in  -^12^  in  describing  the  curve  C;  and  it  is  obvious  J  that  if  G  is  any 
ordinary  curve,  yjr  increases  by  27r  as  the  point  of  contact  of  the  tangent  describes  the 
curve  G;  this  gives  the  required  result. 

Example  1.  Deduce  from  Macdonald's  result  the  theorem  that  a  polynomial  of  degree 
n  has  n  zeros. 

Example  2.  Deduce  from  Macdonald's  result  that  if  a  function  f{z),  analytic  for  real 
values  of  2,  has  all  its  coefficients  real,  and  all  its  zeros  real  and  different,  then  between 
two  consecutive  zeros  of  f(z)  there  is  one  zero  and  one  only  of/'  (2). 


REFERENCES. 

M.  C.  Jordan,  Cours  d'Analyse,  t.  11.  Chap.  vi. 

E.  GrOURSAT,  Gours  d^ Analyse,  Chap.  xiv. 

E.  LiNDELOF,  Le  Calcid  des  Residus,  Chap.  il. 

*  Proc.  London  Math.  Sac.  xxix.  (1898). 

t  /'  (2)  does  not  vanish  on  C  unless  G  has  a  node  or  other  singular  point ;  for,  if  f=(j>  +  i\p, 

where   </>   and   \p   are   real,   since   i  J- =  ^,    it   follows   that   if  f'{z)  =  0  at    any   point,   then 
^  ^  ox      dy 

^     -^ ,  J^      -J^   all  vanish ;    and   these   are   sufficient   conditions   for   a   singular   point   on 
ox     dy     ax      ay 

X  A  formal  proof  could  be  given,  but  it  would  be  long  and  difficult. 


122  THE  PROCESSES  OF  ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.     A  function  </>  {z)  is  zero  when  z=0,  and  is  real  when  z  is  real,  and  is  analytic  when 
\z\^\;  if  ■f{x,y)\s,  the  coefficient  of  i  in  0  {x  +  iy),  prove  that  if  - 1<  ^  <  1, 

'2t         ^sin^ 


/, 


;  /  (cos  6,  sin  6)dd  =  TT(f)  (x). 


0    l-2^cos^  +  .r2 

(Trinity,  1898.) 


*-aia 


'    2.     By  integrating  -| round  a  contour  formed  by  the  rectangle  whose  corners  are 

0,  R,  R+i,  i  (the  rectangle  being  indented  at  0  and  i)  and  making  R-*-cc,  shew  that 


/, 


sin  a^    ,       16"+ 1       1  /T         J     \ 

dx= =-  —  ;;—•  (Legendre.) 

0    e^'^*-!  4e»-l      2a  ^     ^  ' 


3.  By  integrating  log  {-2)Q  (2)  round  the  contour  of  §  6*24,  where  Q  (z)  is  a  rational 
function  such  that  zQ{z)-f~0  as  |2|^-0  and  as  \z\-^ao,  shew  that  if  Q{z)  has  no  poles 

on  the  positive  part  of  the  real  axis,   I     Q  (x)  dx  is  equal  to  the  sum  of  the  residues  of 

log {-z)Q (z)  at  the  poles  of  Q (2) ;  where  the  imaginary  part  of  log ( - 2)  lies  between  +  it. 

4,  Shew  that,  if  a  >  0,  6  >  0, 


/ 


gacosJia:  gin  (^^  gin  6^)  —  =|7r  (e"  -  1). 
0  ^ 


5.     Shew  that 


/ 


a  sin  2.r  ,       1     ,      /,  ,     \      /     -,   ^      ^  i\ 

,xdx  =  -T\og{\  +  a),     (-l<a<l) 


0  1 -2a  cos  207+ a^  4 


=  l,rlog(l+a-i),     (a2>l) 


(Cauchy.) 


6.     Shew  that 


/sin  d)ix  sin  (b„x     s\\id>„x                                sm  a^  ,       t  ,    ,  , 
^-^— ... —  cos  aiX  ...  cos  a„,x —  dx=  -  q)\(p2  ...  (pnt 
Q          X              X                  X                                                 X                 2^"^"^ 

if  ^1,  (^.2,  ...  <pn,  oi,  02, ...  a,rt  be  real  and  a  be  positive  and 

a>  !0i|  +  |02l  +  --.  +  l<^n|  +  |ail  +  ...  +  |aml-  (Stormer.) 

7.  If  a  point  z  describes  a  circle  C  of  centre  a,  and  if  f{z)  be  analytic  throughout 

C  and  its  interior  except  at  a  number  of  poles  inside  C,  then   the  point   u=f{z)   will 

describe  a  closed  curve  y  in  the  w-plane.     Shew  that  if  to  each  element  of  y  be  attributed 

a  mass  proportional  to  the  corresponding  element  of  C,  the  centre  of  gravity  of  y  is  the 

fiz) 
pomt  r,  where  r  is  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  -^-^  at  its  poles  in  the  interior  of  C. 

z  —  a 

(Amigues.) 

8.  Shew  that 

dx  IT  (2a  +  h) 


i: 


9.     Shew  that 

dx  TT     1  .3...(2?i-3)      1 


/ 


0    {a  +  hx'^y^      2"h^    l.2...(n-\)  a'*"*' 


THE   THEORY   OF   RESIDUES  128 


10.     If  Fn  (^)=    n    n  (1  -  x^),  shew  that  the  series 


/(^)=-   2 


F^{xn-^) 


is  an  analytic  function  when  x  is  not  a  root  of  any  of  the  equations  ^=n" ;  and  that  the 
sum  of  the  residues  of  f{x)  contained  in  the  ring-shaped  space  included  between  two 
circles  whose  centres  are  at  the  origin,  one  having  a  small  radius  and  the  other  having 
a  radius  between  n  and  »+ 1,  is  equal  to  the  number  of  prime  numbers  less  than  w-f  1. 

(Laurent.) 

11.  li  A  and  B  represent  on  the  Argand  diagram  two  given  roots  (real  or  imaginary) 
of  the  equation/ (2;)  =  0  of  degree  n,  with  real  or  imaginary  coefficients,  shew  that  there  is 
at  least  one  root  of  the  equation  /'  (^)  =  0  within  a  circle  whose  centre  is  the  middle  point 

o{  AB  and  whose  radius  is  ^AB cot—.  (Grace,  Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.  xi.) 

12.  Shew  that,  if  0  < ./  <  1, 

=  - — ;  lim     2 


[Consider  / 


1  -  e2«^     2»ri „^«  fc=_„  ^  -  ^  * 
■round  a  circle  of  radius  n+j^  ;  and  make  w-^oo  .] 


sm  irz     z  —  x 

(Kronecker.) 

13.     Shew  that,  if  m  >  0,  then 

sin"  mt 


/. 


'  dt 


„m^~i      (  „    ,     n,       „s„    ,     n(n  —  l),       ,.      ,     n(n-l)(n—2) ,       .,      ,        "1 
=  2M^^=^!r  l^"""^^       +      2!      ("-^)        ^^3! ^(^-6)"-^  +  ...} 

Discuss  the  discontinuity  of  the  integral  at  wi  =  0. 

14.     If  A  +  B  +  C+...=0  and  a,  b,  c, ...  are  positive,  shew  that 
A  cos  ax  +  B  cos  bx+  ...  +  Kcoskx 


I 


dx=  —A  loga  — 51og  6—  ...  —  Klogk. 
0  *^ 

(Wolstenholme.) 
15.     By  considering  I    .       .  dt  taken  round  a  rectangle  indented  at  the  origin,  shew 


that,  if  y?;  >  0, 


/p     gz  (*;  +  M)  r  p    gxti 

~f — --rdt  =  7ri+  lim  Pi       — dt, 
—  p  IC-\-tl  a-*-oo       J  -p    ^ 


and  thence  deduce,  by  using  the  contour  of  §  6-222  example  2,  or  its  reflexion  in  the  real 
axis  (according  SiS  x^O  or  x  <0),  that 


1    fp   e^(*  +  «)  ', 
hm   -  ,       ,  dt  =  2,  1  orO, 

a^oo   «•  J  -p  K  +  tl 


according  as  a;  >  0,  .r=0  or  .r  <  0. 

[This  integral  is  known  as  Cauchy's  discontinuous  factor.'] 

16.     Shew  that,  if  0  <  a  <  2,  6  >  0,  r  >  0,  then 

Jo  '  x^-Vr^     ~ 


124  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VI 

-  17.     Let  <>0  and  let    2    e-n^t=y\t{t). 

n=—co 

By  considering  /  -r— ; dz  round  a  rectangle  whose  comers  are  ±  {N-\-\)±i,  where 

N  is  an  integer,  and  making  iV-»-oo  ,  shew  that 

By  expanding  these  integrands  in  powers  of  e'^''^^  e^'"*'^  respectively  and  integrating 
term-by-term,  deduce  from  §  6*22  example  3  that 


(irtr  J  -=0 


Hence,  by  putting  t  =  l  shew  that 

V.(0=«-*^(i/0. 

[This  result  is  due  to  Jacobi,  Ges.  Werke,  ii.  p.  188.] 
18.     Shew  that,  if  «>0, 

jl  +  2  2  e  "  "'''/^  cos  2w7ral . 

(Jacobi ;  and  Landsberg,  Crelle,  cxi.) 


2    e-«'T<-2»T««^^-ig,ra2<^j_j.2  2  g- 

n=-(x> 


CHAPTER  VII 

THE  EXPANSION  OF  FUNCTIONS  IN  INFINITE  SERIES 

7"1.     A  formula  due  to  Darhoux*. 

Let  f{z)  be  analytic  at  all  points  of  the  straight  line  joining  a  to  z,  and 
let  <^  {t)  be  any  polynomial  of  degree  n  in  t. 

Then  if  0  $  <  ^  1,  we  have  by  differentiation 
I-   2  (-)"» {z  -  a)'"  c/)'*^-"**  (0/*"^'  {a  +  t{z-  a)) 

=  -{z-a)  <^<«»  (t)f  {a-\-t(z-  a))  +  (-f  {z  -  ay+'  </>  (0/<"+^*  {a  +  t(z-  a)). 

Noting  that  0''''  (t)  is  constant  =  ^<™'  (0),  and  integrating  between  the 
limits  0  and  1  of  t,  we  get 

</>"^'(0){/(^)-/(a)} 

=  i  (-)'""'  (^  -  «)"*  {<!)<''"""  (^)/'"'*  (^)  -  </>*""'"*  (0)/""'  (a)] 

m=l 

+  (-)»» (z  -  ay^^'  I  <b  (t)p'+'^  (a  +  t(z-  a))  dt, 

Jo 

which  is  the  formula  in  question. 

Taylor's  series  may  be  obtained  as  a  special  case  of  this  by  writing 
(^  (ty  =  {t  —  1)"  and  making  n^  oo  . 

Example.    By  substituting  2n  for  n  in  the  fonnula  of  Darboux,  and  taking  0  (t)  =  t"  {t  —  l )", 
obtain  the  expansion  (supposed  convergent) 

f{z)-f(a)=  i  ^ ~ ^"." ',f r "^" {/"" (^) + ( - )" - v<"> (^)}, 

and  find  the  expression  for  the  remainder  after  «  terms  in  this  series. 
*  Liouville's  Journal  (3),  ii.  (1876),  p.  271. 


126  THE   PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

7'2.     The  Bemoullian  numbers  and  the  Bernoullian  polynomials. 

The  function  \zcot^z  is  analytic  when  \z\<2'rr,  and  since  it  is  an  even 
function  of  z  it  can  be  expanded  into  a  Taylor's  series  thus 

2^ cot  2  ^  =  1  -  5i  2j  - -Sa ^j  -  5s  gj  -  ... ; 

then  Bn  is  called  the  nth  Bernoullian  number*.     It  is  found  thatf 
p 1    T> L    7? L    R 7? A 

-Di  —  6  '   -"2  —  30  '  -03  —  42  '  -"4      30  '   ^6      66  ' 

These  numbers  can  be  expressed  as  definite  integrals  as  follows: 
We  have,  by  example  2  (p.  122)  of  Chapter  vi, 
sin  pxdx  1       i      ,  ■ 

-      2p^  2p  r^^'     2!        ^-^    4!     +•••[• 

1      \ 
niTj 

dx 


f 

Jo 


Since 


x'^  sin  [px  +  -E  nir  j 


e^oc_i 


converges  uniformly  (by  de  la  Vallee  Poussin's  test)  near  p  =  0  we  may,  by 
§  4*44  corollary,  differentiate  both  sides  of  this  equation  any  number  of 
times  and  then  put  p  =  0 ;  doing  so  and  writing  2t  for  x,  we  obtain 


Bn  =  ^n       -—. — - 
Jo  e^'^'-l 


A  proof  of  this  result,  depending  on  contour  integration,  is  given  by  Carda,  Monatshefte 
fur  Math,  und  Phys.  v.  (1894),  PP-  321-4. 

Example.     Shew  that 

"     7r2»(22»-l)  jo     sinh^   -^^■ 

gZt  _  1 

Now  consider  the  function  t  i>— jy,  which  may  be  expanded  into  a 
Maclaurin  series  in  powers  of  t  valid  when  |  ^  |  <  27r. 

The  Bernoullian  polynomialX  of  order  n  is  defined  to  be  the  coefficient  of 
—  in  this  expansion.     It  is  denoted  by  <^„  {z),  so  that 

n  =  l 

*  These  numbers  were  introduced  by  Jakob  Bernoulli  in  his  Ars  Conjectandi. 
t  Tables  of  the  first  sixty-two  Bernoullian  numbers  have  been  given  by  Adams,  Brit.  Ass. 
Rep.  1877. 

X  The  name  was  given  by  llaabe,  Journal  filr  Math.  Bd.  xlii.  (1851),  p.  348. 


'<f-^=^r^r w- 


7-2,  7*21]       THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES  127 

This  polynomial  possesses  several  important  properties.     Writing  (^  + 1) 
for  z  in  the  preceding  equation  and  subtracting  the  two  results,  we  have 

te^=  i  {<^„(^  +  i)-<^„(^)j^,. 

n=l  '''• 

On  equating  coefficients  of  V^  on  both  sides  of  this  equation  we  obtain 

which  is  a  difference-equation  satisfied  by  the  function  <^„  {£). 

An  explicit  expression  for  the  Bemoullian  poljoiomials  can  be  obtained 
as  follows.     We  have 

^e_i  =  ,^  +  _  +  _  +  ...^ 

J  t  t  t       t 


~        2  "*"    2!        4!  "*" 


Hence 


From  this,  by  equating  coefficients  of  P^  (§  3"73),  we  have 

the  last  term   being  that  in  z  or  z^  and  JJ^,  nPi,  ...  being  the  binomial 
coefficients ;  this  is  the  Maclaurin  series  for  the  /ith  Bernoullian  polynomial. 

Example.     Shew  that,  when  «.  >  1, 

7'21.     The  Euler- Maclaurin  expansion. 

In  the  formula  of  Darboux  (§  7"1)  write  ^n(0  for  ^  (0'  where  ^n{t)  is  the 
nth  Bernoullian  polynomial. 
Differentiating  the  equation 

n  —  k  times,  we  have 

<^n'"-*>  {t  +  l)-  <^„'"-*>  {t)  =  n{n-\)...  kt^-\ 

Putting  ^  =  0  in  this,  we  have  </)^<"-*'  (1)  =  (/)n <"'"*'  (0). 
Now,  from  the  Maclaurin  series  for  ^„  (z),  we  have  if  A:  >  0 

^^<n-.fc-i)  (0)  ^  0,      (/)J--^)  (0)  =  ^-^  {~f-'Bk, 


128  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

Substituting  the  values  of  <^n'""*'  (1)  and  <^„<»-*)  (0)  thus  obtained  in 
Darboux's  result,  we  find  what  is  usually*  known  as  the  Euler-Maclaurin 
sum  formula, 

(,  _  a)f'{a)  =  f{z)-f{a)  -  ^  {f'{z)  -/'(«)} 

m=l  (2w) ! 


-^^-J^jy^^(^^f'^'^''  {c^  +  (^-<^)t]dt. 


In  certain  cases  the  last  term  tends  to  zero  as  n-*oc ,  and  we  can  thus 
obtain  an  infinite  series  for  f(z)  —  f{a). 

Writing  tu  for  ^  —  a  and  (p  {x)  for  /'  {cc),  the  last  formula  becomes 
^{x)dx  =  2(^[4>  («)  +  <^  (a  +  «)} 

J  a 

Writing  a  +  co,  a  +  2&),  ...  a  +  (r-  —  1)  o)  for  a  in  this  result  and  adding  up, 
we  get 

ra+ru)  [j  1        ,  .1 

(f) (x) dx  =  a}U<f> (a)  +  (j) {a  +  co)  +  (f)  (a+  2o})  +  . . .  +  ~2(f> (»  +  rcon 

where  7?,^  -  -  r^^--.      ^,n  (t)     2  (^<^*^>  (ci  +  moj  +  o)^)^  dt. 

{Zn)iJo  („j^o  J 

This  last  formula  is  of  the  utmost  importance  in  connexion  with  the 
numerical  evaluation  of  definite  integrals  and  also  in  the  higher  theory  of  the 
Gamma  function.  It  is  valid  if  (f)  (x)  is  analytic  at  all  points  of  the  straight 
line  joining  a  to  a  +  rw. 

Example  1.     If  f{z)  be  an  odd  function  of  z,  shew  that 

where  (f)^  (t)  in  the  Bernoullian  polynomial  of  order  n. 

*  A  history  of  the  formula  is  given  by  Barnes,  Froc.  London  Math.  Soc.   Ser.  2,  Vol.  iii. 
p.  253.     It  was  discovered  by  Euler  (1732),  and  rediscovered  by  Maclaurin  (1742). 


7-3]  THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE  SERIES  129 

Example  2.    Shew,  by  integrating  by  parts,  that  the  remainder  after  n  terms  of  the 
expansion  of  ^  2  cot  ^  z  may  be  written  in  the  form 

(2»)!8m«     /o^ 

(Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

73.     Burmann's  theorem'*. 

We  shall  next  consider  several  theorems  which  have  for  their  object  the 
expansion  of  one  function  in  powers  of  another  function. 

Let  <^  {z)  be  a  function  of  z  which  is  analytic  in  a  closed  region  *Sf  of  which 
a  is  an  interior  point ;  and  let 

<^{a)=h. 

Suppose   also   that    <^'  (a)  =|=  0.      Then   Taylor's    theorem   furnishes   the 
expansion 

<f>(z)-b  =  <(>'  (a)(z  -a)  +  ^^^^^  (z-ay+  ..., 
and  if  it  is  legitimate  to  revert  this  series  we  obtain 

which  expresses  z  as  an  analytic  function  of  the  variable  {(f)(z)  —  b},  for 
sufficiently  small  values  of  j^;  — a|.  If  then /(2^)  be  analytic  near  z  =  a,  it 
follows  that  y* (2')  is  an  analytic  function  of  {(^  (z)  —  b}  when  |  z  —  a  |  is  sufficiently 
small,  and  so  there  will  be  an  expansion  of  the  form 

f{z)=f(a)+a,{<i>(z)-b]+^^{cp(z)-bY  +  ^^{<f>(z)-bY+.... 

The   actual   coefficients  in   the  expansion   are   given    by  the   following 
theorem,  which  is  generally  known  as  Burmann's  theorem. 

Let  i/r  (z)  be  a  function  of  z  defined  by  the  equation 

z  -a 

then  an  analytic  function  f(z)  can,  in  a  certain  domain  of  values  of  z,  be 
expanded  in  the  form 

»*"!  [ck(z\  —bV"'   d"'^~^ 

f(z)  =f(a)  +  S    ^^^{^  '^     '-^_,  [f  (a)  [f  (a.)}-]  +  R^, 


m  =  l 


where  Rn  =  7: — .  I 


m\         do'' 
cf>{z)-b' 

:^(t)-b_ 


-'  f  (t)  (f>'  (z)  dtdz 


c}>{t)-4>(z)     ' 

and  7  is  a  contour  in  the  t-jdane,  enclosing  the  points  a  and  z  and  such  that,  if 
^  be  any  point  inside  it,  the  equation  (f)  {t)  =  (f>  (^)  has  no  roots  on  or  inside  the 
contour  except  j"  a  simple  7'oot  t  =  ^. 

*  Memoires  de  Vhistitut,  ii.  p.  13. 

t  It  is  assumed  that  such  a  contour  can  be  chosen  if  j  2  -  a  |  be  sufficiently  small ;  see  §  7'iil. 
W.   M.  A.  9 


130 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  VII 


To  prove  this,  we  have 


2'7ri]aJ 


-2  (^(Q-h 


+ 


But,  by  §  4-3, 


mt)-h]--^[^{t)-4>{t;)]\ 


^-rrl  JaJy  L^ 


^/'(Of  (0^^t^r_{<^(^)-6}-+^  [      f'(t)dt 


<f)  {t)  -h\  4>{t)-h 


m+l     r 
1)    i. 


27ri(m  +  l)   J^  [</>(0-&} 


m+l 


~  ^Triini  +  1)  J,         (^ -  cir+^  {m  +  1) !      cZa^  K   ^''^  ^^  ^  ^^       -■• 

Therefore,  writing  m  —  1  for  m, 

m=n-\  \fk(2:\  —  h]^^^    (Im-i 


+ 


m! 
1  ' 

2^' 


l4>{t)-b] 


-^f(t)cf>'(Odtd^ 

</>(^)-«/'(0  ' 


If  the  last  integral  tends  to  zero  as  n  -*-  oo ,  we  may  write  the  right-hand 
side  of  this  equation  as  an  infinite  series. 

Example  1.     Prove  that 


where 


^a+  2 


(-)""^(?«(2-a)"e"(^'-«^) 


C,i  =  (2na)"    1 ^ ^^,^ {2na)"^-\ ^ — — g,-- — ~  (2«a)"'^  — 


1! 


2! 


To  obtain  this  expansion,  write 
in  the  above  expression  of  Burmann's  theorem ;  we  thus  have 


But 


z=a+    2   — 1(2-  «)»  e"  ("'  -  «')  ^  ~, 7  e"  C' "  ^') 


\d;2"-i 


g«  (a2  —  32 


g-)i(2a(  +  t3) 


(putting  2  =  a  +  0 


=  (7i-  1)  I  X  the  coefficient  of  <"~^  in  the  expansion  of  e~"*(^"'^') 


=  («  - 1) !  X  tlie  coefficient  of  ^""^  in    2 

^         ^-      ,=oCH-l-r)I(2r-7i  +  l)!- 


(-)'-?i'V(2a  +  0'' 


The  highest  value  of  r  which  gives  a  term  in  the  summation  is  r  =  7i-l.     Arranging 
therefore  the  summation  in  descending  indices  /•,  beginning  with  r  =  ?i  — 1,  we  have 


■(-)"-'£■., 


which  gives  the  required  resuU. 


7*31]  THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES  131 

Example  2.     Obtain  the  expansion 

„      .  o      2    1..        2.4    1    .  „ 

Example  3.  Let  a  line  p  be  drawn  through  the  origin  in  the  2-plane,  perpendicular  to 
the  line  which  joins  the  origin  to  any  point  a.  If  z  be  any  point  on  the  2-plane  which  is 
on  the  same  side  of  the  line  p  as  the  point  a  is,  shew  that 

log2=loga  +  2    2  ^ — -[ ) 

*  ^  ™=i  2»i  +  l  \z  +  aj 

7"31.     Teixeira's  extended  form  of  Burmann's  theorem. 

In  the  last  section  we  have  not  investigated  closely  the  conditions  of 
convergence  of  Burmann's  series,  for  the  reason  that  a  much  more  general 
form  of  the  theorem  will  next  be  stated ;  this  generalisation  bears  the  same 
relation  to  the  theorem  just  given  that  Laurent's  theorem  bears  to  Taylor's 
theorem :  viz.,  in  the  last  paragraph  we  were  concerned  only  with  the 
expansion  of  a  function  in  positive  powers  of  another  function,  whereas  we 
shall  now  discuss  the  expansion  of  a  function  in  positive  and  negative  powers 
of  the  second  function. 

The  general  statement  of  the  theorem  is  due  to  Teixeira*,  whose  exposi- 
tion we  shall  follow  in  this  section. 

Suppose  (i)  that  f{z)  is  a  function  of  z  analytic  in  a  ring-shaped  region  A , 
bounded  by  an  outer  curve  G  and  an  inner  curve  c ;  (ii)  that  6  {z)  is  a  function 
analytic  on  and  inside  C\  and  has  only  one  zero  a  within  this  contour,  the  zero 
being  a  simple  one ;  (iii)  that  ^  is  a  given  point  within  A ;  (iv)  that  for  all 
points  z  of  G  we  have 

and  for  all  points  ^  of  c  we  have 

\d(x)\>\d(z)\. 

The  equation  6  (z)  -  6  (x)  =  0 

has,  in  this  case,  a  single  root  z  =  x  in  the  interior  of  G,  as  is  seen  from  the 
equation  f 

1     C      d'{z)dz     _    1     \l  ^'(^)  ^       a,  ^  f    0'(^)    ^ 
27rilc0(z)-d(x)-27ri    J  c  ^  (^)       "^  ^"''M  c  I^MF       "^  ' ' 


c0{z)-d(x)      27rilJceiz)  "'ici^W 

0' (z)  dz 


2inir 


of  which  the  left-hand  and  right-hand  members  represent  respectively  the 
number  of  roots  of  the  equation  considered  (§  6'31)  and  the  number  of  the 
roots  of  the  equation  0{z)={)  contained  within  G. 

*  CreUe's  Journal,  cxxii.  (1900),  pp.  97-123. 

°°     id  Ix)]  " 
t  The  expansion  is  justified  by  §  4*7,  since  S    L  ,Tf    converges  uniformly  when  z  is  on  C. 

n=i   I''  \^} ) 

9—2 


132  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

Cauchy's  theorem  therefore  gives 
1 

27ri 


/(^)  =  9i:;- 


c  f{z)e'{z)dz     rf(z)e'(z)dz 

i.d{z)-d(x)         Je 


\.d{z)-e{x)    },e{z)-e{x) 

The  integrals  in  this  formula  can,  as  in  Laurent's  theorem,  be  expanded 
in  powers  of  6  {x),  by  the  formulae 

/•  f{z)e'{z)dz_  -        ..  (  f{z)d'{z)dz 

We  thus  have  the  formula 
where 

Integrating  by  parts  we  get,  if  ?i  =i=  0, 

This  gives  a  development  of  f{x)  in  positive  and  negative  powers  of 
6 {x),  valid  for  all  points  x  within  the  ring-shaped  space  A. 

If  the  zeros  and  poles  of /(2^)  and  6  {z)  inside  G  are  known,  An  and  Bn  can 
be  evaluated  by  §  5"22  or  by  §  6"1. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  |.t'|  <  1,  then 

_1  (   ^x  \        1     /   '2x  Y        1.3     /   2^  Y 

^~2  Vi+^V  """2.4  vT+^v  ■*■  27476  Vi+^^V  "^ ■■■■ 

Shew  that,  when  \x\>  1,  the  second  member  represents  x~'^. 

Example  2.     If  ^v*    denote  the  sum  of  all  combinations  of  the  numbers 

22,  42,  62,...(2n-2)2, 
taken  m  together,  shew  that 

i=j_+iizL):i:ij_i ^(Lh)+   +tZ::^)i(3in.)^»- 

2      sinz     „=o(27i  +  2)!  (271  +  3      2?i+l  3  j^         ^        ' 

the  expansion  being  valid  for  all  values  of  z  represented  by  points  within  the  oval  whose 
equation  is  |sin  2!  =  1  and  which  contains  the  point  z  =  Q.  (Teixeira.) 

7"32.     Lagrange  s  tJieorem. 

Suppose  now  that  the  function  f{z)  of  §7'31  is  analytic  at  all  points  in 
the  interior  of  G,  and  let  6  (x)  =  (x  —  a)  6^  {x).  Then  6^  {x)  is  analytic  and 
not  zero  on  or  inside  G  and  the  contour  c  can  be  dispensed  with ;  therefore 
the  formulae  which  give  A^  and  B^  now  become,  by  §  5*22  and  §  6"1, 

"■      277^^  Jciz-  af  [6,  (^)P      n !  da^-'  V,"  (a)|        ^    ^    ^' 
_    1     i  f{z)d'{z)     dz 

B,  =  0. 


7 -32]  THE  EXPANSION  OP  FUNCTIONS  IN  INFINITE  SERIES  133 

The  theorem  of  the  last  section  accordingly  takes  the  following  form,  if 
we  write  0^  {z)=  1/^  {z)'- 

Let  f(z)  and  <j>  (z)  be  functions  of  z  analytic  on  and  inside  a  contour  C 
surrounding  a  point  a,  and  if  the  such  that  the  inequality 

\t<f>{z)\<\z-a\ 
is  satisfied  at  all  points  z  on  the  perimeter  of  C ;  then  the  equation 

e=a+<</,(r), 

regarded  as  an  equation  in  ^,  has  one  root  in  the  interior  of  G ;  and  further 
any  function  of  ^  analytic  on  and  inside  G  can  be  expanded  as  a  power  series 
in  t  by  the  formula 

This  result  was  published  by  Lagrange*  in  1770. 

Example  1.    Within  the  contour  surrounding  a  defined  by  the  inequality  1 2  (z  -  a) |  >  \a\, 
where  |a|  <  ^|a|,  the  equation 

z—a =  0 

z 

has  one  root  {",  the  expansion  of  which  is  given  by  Lagrange's  theorem  in  the  form 

Now,  from  the  elementary  theory  of  quadratic  equations,  we  know  that  the  equation 

z 

has  two  roots,  namely  9ll  +  \/l  +  "^r    ^'^^    9  l^~\/^'''~^l  '  ^"^^  ^^'^  expansion  re- 

presents  the  former  ■^  of  these  only — an  example  of  the  need  for  care  in  the  discussion  of 
these  series. 

Example  2.     If  y  be  that  one  of  the  roots  of  the  equation 

3/=  1+2/ 
which  tends  to  1  when  2-»-0,  shew  that 

,  n(ii  +  b){n  +  %){n  +  1)   ^  ,  n{n  +  6){7i  +  7)(n  +  8)(n  +  9) 
+  4!  z  +~  gj  -  2'  +... 

so  long  as  \z\  <  |-. 

Example  3.     If  x  be  that  one  of  the  roots  of  the  equation 

x=l  +yx^ 
which  tends  to  1  when  y^-0,  shew  that 

,  2a 

logx=y+—^ 

the  expansion  being  valid  so  long  as 


,                  2a- 1    ,     (3a -1)  (3a -2)    , 
log:r=y+-^-/  +  ^ 2  73 ^y'+-, 


\y\  <  |(a-l)«-ia-«|.  (McClintock.) 

*  Mem.  de  VAcad.  de  Berlin,  t.  xxiv. ;  Oeuvres,  t.  11.  p.  25. 
t  The  latter  is  outside  the  given  contour. 


134  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

7"4.     The  expansion  of  a  class  of  functions  in  rational  fractions*. 

Consider  a  function  f{z),  whose  only  singularities  in  the  finite  part 
of  the  plane  are  simple  poles  a^,  a^,  as,  ...,  where  [  Oi  |  ^  |  aj  |  ^  |  ag  |  ^  ... :  let 
61,  62.  h,  •••  he  the  residues  at  these  poles,  and  let  it  be  possible  to  choose  a 
sequence  of  circles  C,^  (the  radius  of  C^  being  Rm)  with  centre  at  0,  not 
passing  through  any  poles,  such  that  |/(^)  |  is  bounded  on  C^.  (The  function 
cosec  z  may  be  cited  as  an  example  of  the  class  of  functions  considered,  and 
we  take  R^  =  (m  +  ^)  tt.)  Suppose  further  that  R^^  -*  00  as  m  ^  qo  and  that 
the  upper  bound  f  of  f(z)  on  C„^  is  itself  bounded  as:|:  m-*  00  ;  so  that  for  all 
points  on  the  circle  G^,  |  f(z)  |  <  M,  where  M  is  independent  of  m. 

Then,  if  x  be  not  a  pole  of  f(z),  since  the  only  poles  of  the  integrand  are 
the  poles  of  f{z)  and  the  point  2  =  x,  we  have,  by  §  6'1, 

^irl  J  C^Z  —  X  -"^  r  dr  —  X 

where  the  summation  extends  over  all  poles  in  the  interior  of  C^. 
But      J-.f     /(i^rf.=   If     /(i^f^  +  JLf      /«,d. 

'iTTlJC^Z  —  X  ^TTl  J  C^  Z  2-771 J  C^Z  (Z  -  X) 

=  /•(0)+  S  ^  +  —  [      fi^i 
7  «>•      ^"rri  J c^  z(z  —  x)' 

if  we  suppose  the  function  f(z)  to  be  analytic  at  the  origin. 

Now  as  m  ^  c»  ,  -^ ,  is  0  (R~^),  and  so  tends  to  zero  as  m  tends 

JC„,2{Z-X) 

to  infinity. 

Therefore,  making  m^  ao  ,  we  have 

0  =f(x)  -/(O)  +Xbn(  -  ~-  -  -  )  -  lim   ^.  f     IMA^  , 

„  =  1  \an-^        aJ       m^oo^TTl  JC^Z{Z-X)' 

which  is  an  expansion  of/(^)  in  rational  fractions  of  x;  and  the  summation 
extends  over  all  the  poles  of  f(x). 

If  |%|<|a„+i|  this  series  converges  uniformly  throughout  the  region  given  by 
|.r|^a,  where  a  is  any  constant  (except  near  the  points  a^).  For  if  R,^  be  the  radius 
of  the  circle  which  encloses  the  points  \ai\,  ...  |«,i|,  the  modulus  of  the  remainder  of  the 
terms  of  the  series  after  the  fii-st  n  is 


f{z)dz 


Ma 
IL,  -  a ' 


I  2nt  J  (,',„  z{z  —  x) 

by  §  4-62 ;  and,  given  f,  we  can  choose  ?i  independent  of  x  such  that  Maj(R„,-a)  <  e. 

*  Mittag-Leffler,  Acta  Soc.  Fennicae,  Vol.  xi.  p.  273. 
t  Which  is  a  function  of  m. 

t  Of  course  R„  need  not  (and  frequently  must  not)  tend  to  infinity  continuously;  e.g.  in  the 
example  taken  R„^={m  +  ^)  ir,  where  m  assumes  only  integer  values. 


ex 

j  c  z-x 

1       1  .  ^ .  ^p+' 

z 


7-4]  .  THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES  185 

The  convergence  is  obviously  still  uniform  even  if  I«,ii  <|an  +  i!  provided  the  terms  of 
the  series  are  grouped  so  as  to  combine  the  terms  corresponding  to  poles  of  equal  moduli. 

If  instead  of  the  condition  \f{z)  |  <  J/"  we  have  the  condition  |  i~^f(z)  I  <  J/",  where  M  is 
independent  of  m  when  z  is  on  (7^,  and  jo  is  a  positive  integer,  then  we  should  have  to 

pand  I    —^—r  fjy  writnig 

and  should  obtain  a  similar  but  somewhat  more  complicated  expansion. 
Example  1.     Prove  that 

1  /       s      /       1-  1   \ 

cosec2  =  -  +  2(-)"      -       + —    , 

Z  \2  -  TiTT       nir) 

the  summation  extending  to  all  positive  and  negative  values  of  n. 

To  obtain  this  result,  let  cosec  *  —  =fi?)-     The  singularities  of  this  function  are  at  the 
points  z=niT,  where  n  is  any  positive  or  negative  integer. 

The  residue  of  f(z)  at  the  singularity  nn  is  therefore  (-  )",  and  the  reader  will  easily 

see  that  \f{z)\  is  bounded  on  the  circle  \z\  =  {7i+^)Tr  as  n-^x> . 

Applying  now  the  general  theorem 

f{z)=f{0)  +  2cJ:r^  +  y\, 
|_«  -  a^      «„  J 

where  c„  is  the  residue  at  the  singularity  «„,  we  have 

/(.)=/(0)  +  .(-).^^  +  J-}, 

But  ■'  ■■       /(0)=  lim— !"— ^  =  0. 

■^  '  '      ^^0  ^  sin  s 

Therefore  cosec  s  =  -  +  2  (  -  )'M -\ , 

z  \_z  —  7i7r      nirj 

which  is  the  required  result. 

Example  2.     If  0  <  a  <  I,  shew  that 

go?    ^i       ^22  cos  2na7r  -  Aim  sin  2nair 

Example  3.     Prove  that 

1  1112  1 

+ 


27r^^(cosh;i?-cos  A')      27r.r^      t"^  — c-'^  tt^  +  ^a'*      e^n-- e-2n- (27r)4-f^.r* 

_  _^ 1 

The  general  term  of  the  series  on  the  right  is 


{ev^-e-rn){(^r7rf  +  \x*y 
which  is  the  residue  at  each  of  the  four  singularities  r,  —  ;•,  ri,  —ri  of  the  function 


(7r*2*  +  |.r-*)  {eirz  —  f-  irz)  sin  ttZ  ' 


136  THE   PROCESSES    OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

The  singularities  of  this  latter  function  which  are  not  of  the  type  r,  -  r,  ri,  -  ri  are 
at  the  five  points 

0     -^^^ — ~  '    . 

2 
At  2=0  the  residue  is  — -i ; 

at  each  of  the  four  points  ^=       ^Z       '  *^^  residue  is 

{inx^  (cos  X  —  cosh  x)]  ~  ^ . 
Therefore 

oc      (-!)'•/•  1  2 2 

^^^  grTT  _  e  -  j-TT  (,.^)4  + 1 X*      77^*      77^2  (cosh  X  -  cos  *■) 

1       .        C  TTzdz 

^  2^1  }!^i  J  c  (77*02 _ia,-*)(e-^-e-T^)  sin  ,72 ' 

where  C  is  the  circle  whose  radius  is  n+-,  {n  an  integer),  and  whose  centre  is  the  origin. 

But,  at  points  on  C,  this  integrand  is  0  (j^l-^) ;  the  limit  of  the  integral  round  Cis  there- 
fore zero. 

From  the  last  equation  the  required  result  is  now  obvious. 

Example  4.  Prove  that  sec  ^-=477  (^^^34^.,  -  ^^2  '^4^2  +  ^r^J_  4^2  -•••)• 

Example  5.  Prove  that  cosech  x  =  -  -  2,r  (^^^  +  ^72  "  4^2 ^.^.2  +  9,^2+^2  -•••)• 

Example  6.  Prove  that  sech ^.=477  {~_-^~i -  g^^^^^  +  25772  + 4^.2  "  -)  ' 

Example  7.  Prove  that  coth  -'^=  -  +2.*'  (    2  ,    ,2  +  .    2_i.   2  +  q   2T  .2  +  ••• )  • 

X  \  77" -J- tt'  ^TT    ~x' X  tjTT    'J' X  J 

cc  X  "I  2 

Example  8.     Prove  that     2         2      7--^ ...  ,  .. — y-k  =  ^  coth  77a  coth  776. 

(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 

7'5.     TA-e  expansion  of  a  class  of  functions  as  infinite  products. 

The   theorem  of  the  hist   article   can  be  applied  to  the  expansion  of 
a  certain  class  of  functions  as  infinite  products. 

For   let  f{z)    be    a    function    which    has    simple    zeros    at    the    points* 
tt),  a.,,  a-i,  ...,  where  lim    a,^  j  is  infinite  ;  and  let  f(z)  be  analytic  for  all  values 

of  Z. 

Then/'(2')  is  analytic  for  all  values  of  z  (§  5"22),  and  so  •   .        can  have 
singularities  only  at  the  points  ctj,  a.,,  a-^,  .... 
Consequently,  by  Taylor's  theorem, 

f{z)  =  {z-  a,)f'  (a,)  +  t-.«zl'/" (,,^.)  +  . . . 

and  f'{z)=  f  {a,)  +  (^  -  a,)/"  {a,)  +  . . . . 

*  These  being  the  only  zeros  of/ (2);  and«,,  \:0. 


7*5,  7*6]         THE   EXPANSION  OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE  SERIES  137 

f  (z) 
It  follows  immediately  that  at  each  of  the  points  a^,  the  function  "^ ,    . 

has  a  simple  pole,  with  residue  +  1. 

If  then  we  can  find  a  sequence  of  circles  C,„  of  the  nature  described  in 

%.  7 '4,  such    that  -^r-!.    is   bounded   on   C,„    as   m --  cc ,  it  follows,  from  the 

expansion  given  in  §  7 '4,  that 

f(^)       /(O)      ,1=1  [2 -an     a„] 
Since  this  series  converges  uniformly  when  the  terms  are  suitably  grouped 
(§  7*4),  we  may  integrate  term-by-term  (§  4*7 ).     Doing  so,  and  taking  the 
exponential  of  each  side,  we  get 

/W  =  o./.».    n{(i-£).».|, 

where  c  is  independent  of  z. 

Putting  z  =0,  we  see  that  /(O)  =  c,  and  thus  the  general  result  becomes 

/(^)=/(0)./(")      n     (l-^je 

This  furnishes  the  expansion,  in  the  form  of  an  infinite  product,  of  any 
function  f(z)  which  fulfils  the  conditions  stated. 

Example  1.     Consider  the  function  f{z)  = ,  which  has  simple  zeros  at  the  points 

z 

Tit,  where  r  is  any  positive  or  negative  integer. 

In  this  case  we  have  /(O)  =  1,    /'  (0) =0, 

and  so  the  theorem  gives  immediately 


sin 2       ="     (A       z\    -]    r/        z\    -—1 
z         n=i   {\       rnvj        )    W       nnj  J 


f  (z) 
for  it  is  easily  seen  that  the  condition  concerning  the  behaviour  of  •-~r-  as  |^]-*-X!   is 

fulfilled. 

Example  2.     Prove  that 

{-m  hG.-^.)}  {-G.U}  l-GM  \^<J^\ 

_  cosh  k  —  cos  .r 
1  —  cos  X 

(Trinity,  1899.) 

7*6.     The  factor  theorem  of  Weierstrass*. 

The  theorem  of  §  7*5  is  very  similar  to  a  more  general  theorem  in  which 
the  character  of  the  function /(^•),  as  |  ^^  |  -*  oo  ,  is  not  so  nan-owl}-  restricted. 

*  Math.  Werke,  Bd.  ii.  pp.  77-124. 


138 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  VII 


Let  f{z)  be  a  function  of  z  with  no  essential  singularities  (except  at  '  the 
point  infinity');  and  let  the  zeros  and  poles  oi  f{z)  be  at  (h,  a^,  a^,  ...,  where 

0  <  I  tti  I  ^  I  tta  ]  ^  I  as  I . . . .     Let  the  zero*  at  an  be  of  (integer)  order  m„. 

If  the  number  of  zeros  and  poles  is  unlimited,  it  is  necessary  that 
!  a„  I  ^  00 ,  as  n^  oo;  for  if  not,  the  points  a„  would  have  a  limit  pointf, 
which  would  be  an  essential  singularity  of  f(z). 

We  proceed  to  shew  first  of  all  that  it  is  possible  to  find  polynomials 
(jf,i  (z)  such  that 


n 


1   _  Jl   )  efl-nC^) 

a 


converges  for  rWI  finite  values  of  z. 

Let  K  be  any  constant,  and  let  \z\<  K;  then,  since  \an\^^ ,  we  can 
find  N  such  that,  when  n  >  iV,  |  a„  |  >  2K. 

The  first  iV  factors  of  the  product  do  not  affect  its  convergence:]: ;  consider 
any  value  of  n>  N,  and  let 


^"(")  =  a:  +  5t'+-  + 


k„  —  l\a 


kn-l 


Then 


m  =  k 

1  /zy 

Z 

smce  |2^rt,r':<2 


Hence 


<  2  I  {Ka-'f-  I , 

(1 )e3,J'n     =e"-<^> 

V       aj         1 

u,,{z)\^'2\m„{Ka-^fn\, 


Now  ?/i„  and  a,^  are  given,  but  k,^  is  at  our  disposal  ;"[since  Ka^"'^  <  1,  we 
choose  k„  to  be  the  smallest  number  such  that  2  |  m„  (^a,,~^)*=»  |  <  6,^  where 

S  h,^  is  any  convergent  series§  of  positive  terms. 

M=l 


Hence 


n 


g<7„(2) 


n=.Y+l 


where  [  w,^  {z)  \<h„;  and  therefore,  since  6,^  is  independent  of  z,  the  product 
converges  absolutely  and  uniformly  when  \z\<  K,  except  near  the  points  a„. 


*  We  here  regard  a  pole  as  being  a  zero  of  negative  order. 

t  From  the  two-dimensional  analogue  of  §  2-21. 

:;:  Provided  that  z  is  not  at  one  of  the  points  «„  for  which  in^^  is  negative. 

§  E.g.  we  might  take  ?>„=2-". 


7-7]  THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE  SERIES  139 


Now  let  F{z)=  n 

n  =  l 


Then  \i  f{z)^  F{z)  =  Oi{z),  Gi{z)  is  an  integral  function  (§  5-64)  of  z 
and  has  no  zeros. 

It  follows  that  ri  /  \  j^^it-^)  is  analytic  for  all  finite  values  of  z;  and 

(jt^yZj  CiZ 

so,  by  Taylor's  theorem,  this  function  can  be  expressed  as  a  series  2  n6„2"~^ 
converging  everywhere ;  integrating,  it  follows  that 

00 

where  G{z)=  2  bnZ"-  and  c  is  a  constant ;  this  series  converges  everywhere, 

and  so  G  (z)  is  an  integral  function. 
Therefore,  finally, 

f(z)=:fiO)eOi^)  U^  r|(i  _-i)e^„(^)|"'' 

where  G  (z)  is  some  integral  function  such  that  G  (0)  =  0. 

[Note.     The  presence  of  the  arbitrary  element  G(z)  which  occurs  in  this  formula  for 

f{z)  is  due  to  the  lack  of  conditions  as  to  the  behaviour  of /(z)  as  |  z  |  -»-  oc  .] 
Corollary.     If  m,i==l,  it  is  sufficient  to  take  kn=n,  by  §  2'36. 

7'7.  The  expansion  of  a  class  of  periodic  functions  in  a,  series  of 
cotangents. 

Let  f{z)  be  a  periodic  function  of  z,  analytic  except  at  a  certain  number 
of  simple  poles ;  for  convenience,  let  tt  be  the  period  of  f{z)  so  that 
f{z)=f{z^'rr). 

Let  z  =  x-\-iy  and  let  f{z)  -*  I  uniformly  with  respect  to  x  as  y  ^  +  oo  , 
when  O^x^ir;  similarly  let  f{z)  -*  I'  uniformly  as  y  ^  —  x  . 

Let  the  poles  oi  f{z)  in  the  strip  0  <  ^  ^  tt  be  at  ttj,  a.2,  ...  a„ ;  and  let  the 
residues  at  them  be  Cj,  c^,  ...  c,^. 

Further,  let  ABGD  be  a  rectangle  whose  corners  are*  —ip,  ir  —  ip, 
TT+ip'  and  ip'  in  order. 

Consider  -— .  I  f  (t)  cot  (t  -  z)  dt 

taken  round  this  rectangle ;  the  residue  of  the  integrand  at  a^  is  c,.  cot  (a^.  —  z), 
and  the  residue  at  z  is  f(z). 

Also  the  integrals  along  DA  and  CB  cancel  on  account  of  the  periodicity 
of  the  integrand ;  and  as  p^cc ,  the  integi-and  on  AB  tends  uniformly  to  I'i, 
while  as  p'  ^  GO    the  integrand  on  CD  tends  uniformly  to  —  li ;  therefore 

2  (l'  —  I)  =f{z)  +  2  Cy  cot  («,.  —  z). 

)•  =  ! 

*  If  any  of  the  poles  are  on  x  =  ir,  shift  the  rectangle  slightly  to  the  right ;  p,  p'  are  to  be 
taken  so  large  that  aj,  ao,  ...a^  are  inside  the  rectangle. 


140  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

That  is  to  say,  we  have  the  expansion 

1  " 

f{z)  =  2  {V  -  ^)  +    S    Cr  cot  {Z  —  ttr). 
r=l 

Example  1. 

n  , 

cot  {x  —  ai)  cot  (.r  -  a2)  •  •  •  cot  {x — a„)  =  2 '  cot  (a,.  —  a^)  ...*.. .  cot  (a^  —  a„)  cot  (;r  —  a,.)  +  ( -  )3", 

r=l 

or  =  2'  cot  (a,.  — CTj)  ...*...  cot  (a^-  <^n)  cot  {x  —  a^, 

according  as  n  is  even  or  odd ;  the  *  means  that  the  factor  cot  (a,.  -  a^)  is  omitted  from  the 
product. 


Example  2.     Prove  that 

sin  {x-hi)  sin  (^  —  62)  •  •  •  sin  (,-r  —  hn)  _  sin  («!  -&i)  ...  sin  (at  -  6,^) 
sin  (.r  —  tti)  sin  {x-a^j  ...  sin  (^ -  «„)      sin  (aj  —  02)  •  •  •  sin  (aj  —  a„) 

sin  (a.2  —  6,) . . .  sin  (a2  —  b„) 


sin  («2  — «i)  •••  sin  (a2  —  an) 


cot  (.r  —  ai) 
cot  (.r  -  a2) 


+  . 


+  cos{ai  +  a2  +  ...+an-bi-b2-...-bn). 
7'8.     Borel's  integral^. 

Let/(0)  =  S  a^s^**  be  analytic  when  \z\^r,  so  that,  by  §  5"23,  |  a„?'"  j  <  if, 

re=0 

where  M  is  independent  of  n. 


00  yn,  ^71 


Hence  if  <p{z)  =  X  -^^ ,  </>  (2^)  is  an  integral  function,  and 
and  similarly  |  <^<"'  (z)  \  <  ilfel^l/'Y?'". 

/•CO 

Now  consider /i(^)=  I    e~^  (f)  {zt)  dt ;  this  integral  is  an  analytic  function 
of  z  when  \z\  <r,  by  §  5%32. 
Also,  on  integrating  by  parts. 


M^)  = 


-e-f(p(zt) 


+  z      e-*<^'{zt)dt 


=   t  z" 

m  =  0 


e-t^m  (-^^) 


+  ^'^+1  I    e-*(li^''+'^(zt)dt. 
0  J  0 


But  liin e-«<^('«)  (^i)  =  a,,^ ;  and,  when  \z\<r,  lim e-«<^<'«)  (t)  =  0. 


Therefore 


/i(2)=  2  «,«2'"  +  i2„, 


t  LeQons  sur  les  series  divcrgcntes,  Ch.  iii.     See  also  the  memoirs  cited  on  p.  94  of  that 
work. 


7-8,  7*81]        THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS  IN  INFINITE  SERIES 

where  I  i2„  k  |  ^«+M  f  e"' .  Me  l^HIrr-^-^  dt 

Jo 

<  I  zr-^  i^+^ilf  {1  -  I  ^ !  r-^}-^  -►  0,  as  w  -«-  (30 . 
Consequently  when  \z\<  r,   ' 

Mz)=  2  arr^z-^^fiz); 


141 


>»=0 


and  so 


f{z)=re-'<f>{zt)dt, 
Jo 


00    fji     vU  oo 

where  <f>(z)=  2  ^-^ ;  <f>  (z)  is  called  BoreVs  function  associated  with  %  ttnZ^. 

M=0    U I  n=0 

If  >S'=  2  a„  and  (}>{z)=  2  -^  and  if  we  can  establish  the  relation  S=  I    e"'d>  (t)  dt, 

the  series  *S'  is  said  (§  8"41)  to  be   '•  summahle  (BY;   so  that  the  theorem  just  proved 
shews  that  a  Taylor's  series  representing  an  analytic  function  is  summable  (B). 

7'81.     BoreVs  integral*  and  analytic  continuation. 

It  can  now  be  shewn  that  Borel's  integral  represents  an  analytic  function  in  a  more 
extended  region  than  the  interior  of  the  circle  |2|=r. 


This  extended  region  is  obtained  as  follows :  take  the  singularities  a,  h,  c,  ...  oi  f{z)  and 
through  each  of  them  draw  a  line  perpendicular  to  the  line  joining  that  singularity  to  the 
origin.  The  lines  so  drawn  will  divide  the  plane  into  regions  of  which  one  is  a  polygon 
with  the  origin  inside  it. 

Then  BoreVs  integral  represents  an  analytic  function  (which,  by  §  5  "5  and  §  7  "8,  is 
obviously  that  defined  by  f{z)  and  its  continuations)  throughout  the  interior  of  this 
polygon.  The  reader  will  observe  that  this  is  the  first  actual  formula  obtained  for  the 
analytic  continuation  of  a  function,  exce^jt  the  trivial  one  of  §  5"5,  exam})le. 

*  Borel,  Le<jons  sur  les  series  divergentes,  pp.  122-129. 


142  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

For,  take  any  point  P  with  affix  (  inside  the  polygon ;  then  the  circle  on  OP  as 
diameter  has  no  singularity  on  or  inside  it* ;  and  consequently  we  can  draw  a  slightly 
larger  concentric  circlet  G  with  no  singularity  on  or  inside  it.     Then,  by  §  5*4, 

and  SO  ^{(t)  =  -^.  2  ^        '^[dz; 

but  2  ^ — ■  =^-^  converges  uniformly  (§  3*34)  on  C  since  f{z)  is  bounded  and  |  2 1  ^  8  >  0 
7i=o  n\  2"  +  i 

where  b  is  independent  of  z. 
Therefore,  by  §  4"7, 

0aO  =  A.  f   2-V(2)exp(C«0-i)c?0, 

and  so,  when  t  is  real,  i  0  {^t)  \<F{^)  e^^,  where  F  (^)  is  bounded  in  any  closed  region  lying 
wholly  inside  the  polygon  and  is  independent  of  t ;  and  X  is  the  greatest  value  of  the 
real  part  of  ^jz  on  C. 

If  we  draw  the  circle  traced  out  by  the  point  zj^,  we  see  that  the  real  part  of  ^jz  is 
greatest  wlien  z  is  at  the  extremity  of  the  diameter  through  ^,  and  so  the  value  of  X  is 

lf|.{|fl  +  S}-i<l. 

We  can  get  a  similar  inequality  for  0' (CO  and  hence,  by  §  5'32,    /     e~^cf)  (^t)  dt  is 

./  0 
analytic  at  f  and  is  obviously  a  one-valued  function  of  ^. 

This  is  the  result  stated  above. 

7'82.     Expansions  in  series  of  inverse  factorials. 

A  mode  of  development  of  functions,  which,  although  first  investigated 
by  SchlomilchiJ:  as  long  ago  as  1863,  has  only  recently  been  recognised  as 
being  of  considerable  importance  §  is  that  of  expansion  in  a  series  of  inverse 
factorials. 

To  obtain  such  an  expansion  of  a  function  analytic  when  l^l  >  r,  we  let 
the  function  he  f{z)=  "t  anZ~'\  and  use  the  formula /(^)  =  I    ze~^^^{t)dt, 

11  =  0  Jo 

00 

where  (}>(t)=  X  anf^/(n !) ;  this  result  may  be  obtained  in  the  same  way  as 
that  of  §  7-8.     Modify  this  by  writing  e-«  =  1  -  ^,  <^  (t)  =  F{^) ;  then 


Jo 


Now  if  t  =  u  +  iv  and  if  t  be  confined  to  the  strip  — 'n-<v<7r,  tisa  one- 
valued  function  of  ^  and  F  (^)  is  an  analytic  function  of  ^ ;  and  |  is  restricted 

*  The  reader  will  "easily  verify  this  by  considering  the  figure ;  for  if  there  were  such  a 
singularity  the  side  of  the  polygon  corresponding  to  it  would  pass  between  0  and  P  ;  i.e.  P  would 
be  outside  the  polygon. 

t  The  difference  of  the  radii  of  the  circles  being,  say,  5. 

J  Compendium  der  Iwheren  Analysis. 

§  By  Kluyver,  Nielsen  and  Pincberle.  See  Comptes  Rendus,  Vols.  133,  134,  Annales  de  VEcole 
norm,  sup.,  Ser.  3,  Vols.  19,  21,  23,  and  Palermo  Eendiconti,  Vol.  34. 


7-82] 


THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES 


143 


SO  that  —  TT  <  arg  (1  —  ^)  <  tt.  Also  the  interior  of  the  circle  |  ^  =  1  corresponds 
to  the  interior  of  the  curve  traced  out  by  the  point  t  =  —  log  (2  cos  5^)  +  h*^, 
(writing  ^  =  exp  [i{d  +  tt)})  ;  and  inside  this  curve 

\t\-R{t)^WR{t)Y-\-ir^-\^-R{t)-^0, 
as  J2  (<)  •♦  00 . 

It  follows  that,  when  |||^1,  |F(^)|  <  ife''l<l  <  il/i|  e*"'!,  where  My  is  in- 
dependent of  t ;  and  so  F  (|)  <  M,  \  (1  -  |)-^  | . 

Now  suppose  that  0  < |  <  1 ;  then,  by  §  5-23,  j  J?**"'  (|)  \<  M^.n  lp-»,  where 
M2  is  the  upper  bound  of  \F(z)\  on  a  circle  with  centre  ^  and  radius 
/,<l-e 

Taking  p  = r-  (1  —  |)  and  observing  that*  (1  +  ??"*)"  <  e  we  find  that 


|i^(">(^)|<  Jfi 


lHl  +  :r^^^ 


;r:ri^|J    -^'j-VTl 


<  Mye (n  +  ly .nl(l-  ^)-'-«. 

Remembering  that,  by  §  4-5,        means  lim   /       ,  we  have,  by  repeated 

Jo  f^+0^0 


integrations  by  parts. 


f{z)  =  lim 

e-*-  +  0 


=  lim 


0  Jo 

1-e  1^ 

0      ^^  +  1 


1     -1-e 


1-e 

0 


=  bo  + 


h         

z  +  1'^  {z  +  I)  {z  +  2)'^  "-  '^  (z  +l){z  +  2)  ...  {z  +  11) 


+ 


+  ...+ 


h 


where 


bn  =  lim 

e-»-0 


-(1    -  ^)^+«i^<«)  (^) 


1-e 


=  F""  (0), 

if  the  real  part  of  z  +  n  —  r  —  n>0,  i.e.  if  R{z)>  r;  further 

\Rn\  < 


lim  |(l-|^)"+"i^<"+^*(^)'^^ 


\(z+l){z  +  2)...(z  +  n)\  ,^oJo 
Mie(n  +  2y.  n  I 
^  \(z  +  l)(z  +  2) ...  (z  +  n)\ .  R{z  -r) 

M,e(n  +  2y.n\ 

^  (r  +  1  +  B){r  +  2  +  B) ...  {r  +  n  +  8) .8' 
where  8  =  R  (z  —  r). 

*  (l  +  x^^"  increases  with  x;  for >  e",  when  w<l,  and  so  log  ( )  >  n.     That  is  to 

1-2/  ^       '  Vl-2//      -^ 

say,  putting  y-i  =  1  +  x,  ---  x  log  (1  +  x-i)  =  log  (1  +  x-i)  -  :; >  0. 

ax  }.  +  X 


144  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 


A{i'-'i.y"] 


tends  to  a  limit  (§  2-71)  as  n-*oo  ,  and  so  j  -KJ— 0  if  {n  +  ^fe-^'^'^^'"^  tends 
to  zero ;  but 

n  f  n+1  fl^ 

1  l/m>  -  =  log(n  +  l), 

by  §  4-43  (II),  and  {n  +  2y  (n  +  l)-**-^  -^0  when  8  >0;  therefore  Rn^O  as 
n^oc ,  and  so  when  R(z)>r  we  have  the  convergent  expansion 

J{^)  =  (^o  +  ^-:^rl+(^+l)(z  +  2y^•''^(z  +  l)(z+2)...iz  +  ny"" 
Example  1.     Obtain  the  same  expansion  by  using  the  results 

1  1  r^ 

(3+1)  (2  +  2)...  (2  +  71  +  1)        ?l!./o  ^  ^  ' 

f  fjfydt^^l  ^^  (' f(t)(i-^iY-t--^du. 

Example  2.     Obtain  the  expansion 

/       1\      1  or-i  a^ 

where  «„=  /    t(l-t){2-t)...{n-l-t)dt, 

J  0 

and  discuss  the  region  in  which  it  converges.  (Schlomilch.) 

REFERENCES. 
E.  GouRSAT,  Cours  d^ Analyse,  Chs.  xv,  xvi. 
E.  BoREL,  Lecons  sur  les  series  divergentes. 
T.  J.  Pa.  Bromwich*    Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  Chs.  viii,  x,  xi. 

0.  Schlomilch,  Compendium  der  hiiheren  Analysis,  ii  (Dresden,  1874). 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  If  y -.v-(j}  [y)  =  0,   whei'e   (/>   is   a  given   function   of   its  argument,   obtain  the 
expansion 

/(„)=/(,.)+ J_  A  (^  (,)j,.  (^  _^,^^^  ^)'V(,,), 

where  /  denotes  any  analytic  function  of  its  argument,  and   discuss  the  range  of  its 
validity.  (Levi-Civitk..) 

2.  Obtain  (from  Darboux's  formula  or  otherwise)  the  expansion 

/(2)-/(«)=  i  ^"j"n^'7v5^{/<"K^)-^-"/'"H«)}; 

n=l        '<'  •  \i-  ~  '  ) 

find  the  remainder  after  n  terms,  and  discuss  the  convergence  of  the  series. 

*  The  expansions  considered  by  Bromwich  are  obtained  by  elementary  methods,  i.e.  without 
the  use  of  Cauchy's  theorem. 


THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES  145 


3.    Shew  that 


+ 

where 


J  0 

and  shew  that  •/„  (a;)  is  the  coefficient  of  n ! «"  in  the  expansion  of  {(1  -tx)  (1  +  <  -  tx)}  ~  ^  in 
ascending  powers  of  t. 

4.     By  taking 

in  the  formula  of  Darboux,  shew  that 

f{x+h)-f{x)=  -  J^  am  ^  {/(™)  {x  +  h)  -  l/C")  (^)| 

+  (-)«A™  +  i  \(f){t)fC''*'^){x->rht)dt, 
J  0 

1  -  r        ^  M  tfi  u^ 

1  — re    "  1        -*  2  !        ^  3 ! 


where  . ^  =  1  -  a,  -  +  a„  -^  -  a„  —  + 


5.     Shew  that 


2% ! 


,-     al^t  +  i   /"i 


2nl 


where  ^^(t)  =  -^[P^  (^^Y] 

6.     Prove  that 

-  Ci  {Z2 - ^i) V^  (^i)  +  •••  +  (-)" (^2 - hY ^'  I'  \^,  (e'" sech  H)l       /(»  + 1) (3i  +  ^^2 - ^) (^^ ; 

/    0     l«W.  j  „^g 

in  the  series  plus  signs  and   minus  signs  occur  in  pairs,  and  the  last  term  before  the 
integral  is  that  involving  {z^  -  Sj)"  ;  also  C„  is  the  coefficient  of  &"•  in  the  expansion  of 

cot  f --- j  in  ascending  powers  of  2.  (Trinity,  1899.) 

*    7.     If  x^  and  x^  are  integers,  and  <^  {z)  is  a  function  which  is  analytic  and  bounded  for 
all  values  of  z  such  that  x^^  R  {z)^X2,  shew  (bv  integrating 

/   (^  {z)  dz 

J  e±27i-i5r  _  1 

round  indented  rectangles  whose  corners  are  x^,  x<,,  X2±  oc  i,  Xi  ±  oo  {)  that 

I  (^  (.ri)  +  (^  (:?;i  + 1 )  +  (/)  (.Ti  +  2)  + . . .  +  (^  (.i-2  -  1 )  + 1 <|)  (o-'g) 

=  ('''cb  (z)dz+-  f  "  </> (^-2  +  ^^y)  - <^  (.^i  +  ty) - 0  (a-2  - ^>/)  +  (f>(x^-  >>/)  , 
J  x>  i  J  0  e2Tj/  - 1  •^' 

W,  M.  A.  10 


146  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

Hence  by  applying  the  theorem 

where  B^,  B.^,  ...  are  Bernoulli's  numbers,  shew  that 

<l>{l)  +  cl>{2)  +  ...  +  (f>{n)  =  C+^_cp{n)+  j''(f>  (z)  dz+l^^-^^^^'  (l>i'^-'){n), 

(where  C  is  a  constant  not  involving  n)  provided  that  the  last  series  converges. 

.    (Plana.) 

8.  Obtain  the  expansion 

X       -^     ,     ,      ,1.3...  (2n-S)  x" 

for  one  root  of  the  equation  x  =  2u  +  u%  and  shew  that  it  converges  so  long  as  \x\  <  1. 

9.  If  aSI"^',  ,  denote  the  sum  of  all  combinations  of  the  numbers 

V,    32,    52,  ...  (27i-l)2, 

taken  m  together,  shew  that 

z         smz^nto{2n  +  2)\\2n  +  3      ^^n+i)  271  +  I  ^  •••^^     ^'^2(»+i)3j' 

fTeixeira.) 

10.  If  the  function  f{z)  is  analytic  in  the  interior  of  that  one  of  the  ovals  whose 
equation  is  |sins|  =  C  (where  C^  1),  which  includes  the  origin,  shew  that  f{z)  can,  for  all 
points  z  within  this  oval,  be  expanded  in  the  form 

/(.)=/(0)+  i  /"-U0)+.n^"-"(0)+...+<r"/»(0)^,^^..„^ 

n=i  2n  ! 

-  /'^»-^)(0)  +  <V,/(^"-MO)  +  -  +  <',,.r(0)    .   ^,^^^ 
«=o  (2n  +  l)!  ' 

where  S ,    is  the  sum  of  all  combinations  of  the  numbers 

in 

2%  42,  62,  ...  {2n-2)\ 
taken  m  together,  and  'S'^™*    denotes  the  sum  of  all  combinations  of  the  numbers 

12,    32,    52,  ...(2W-1)2, 

taken  m  together.  (Teixeira.) 


11.     Shew  that  the  two  series 


2z^     2z^ 
2z  +  ^  +  ^  +  ..., 


,  2z  2      /    2z  y       2.4  /    2z 

and  +. 


1-22      1.32  Vl-32;    ^3.52  Vl-£2 

represent  the  same  function  in  a  certain  region   of  the  z  plane,  and  can  be  transformed 
into  each  other  by  Burmann's  theorem.  (Kapteyn.) 

12.  If  a  function  /(z)  is  periodic,  of  period  27r,  and  is  analytic  at  all  points  in  the 
infinite  strip  of  the  plane,  included  between  the  two  branches  of  the  curve  |sin2|  =  C 
(where  C  >  1),  shew  that  at  all  points  in  the  strip  it  can  be  expanded  in  an  infinite  series 
of  the  form 

/(2)  =  .lo  +  ^iSin3  +  ...+^l„sin"2+ 

+  cos2(Z?,  +  52sins  +  ...+i?„sin»-i2+...); 
and  find  the  coefficients  A„  and  B^. 


THE   EXPANSION   OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE   SERIES 


147 


13.     If  (f)  and/  be  connected  by  the  equation 
of  which  one  root  is  a,  shew  that 


X  1 


!  2 
the  general  term  being  ( - ) 


X3 


^^^)-^    1(^'-^^''^1!2!(^'3|<^"    (/2i^')  I      1!2!3!>'8 


multiplied  by  a  determinant  in  which 


1!  2!...m!((^')^"*('»  +  i) 

the  elements  of  the  first  row  are  0',  (0^)',  (0')',  ...,  {<i>^~^)',{p  F')  and  each  row  is  the 
diflferential  coefficient  of  the  preceding  one  ;  and  F,  /,  F\  ...  denote 

dF{a) 


J'W,  /(«), 


da     ' 


(Wronski,  Philosophie  de  la  Technie,  Section  ii.  p.  381.) 

14.     If  the  function   W  {a,  b,  x)  be  defined  by  the  series 

Tir  /      X      V           a  —  h„     (a-b)  (a  —  26)    , 
W{a,  b,  ^)=^+-Yr^+  3! ^^  +  .-, 


which  converges  so  long  as 
shew  that 


I   77  I  ^  


^^^  W{a,  b,  x)  =  l  +  (a-b)  W{a-b,  b,  x)  ; 

and  shew  that  if  ?/=  W(a,  b,  x), 

then  x=  Tf  (6,  a,  y). 

Examples  of  this  function  are 

ir(i,  0,  x)= 6=^-1, 

W{0,  1,  .r)  =  log(l +.»;), 
{l  +  xY-l 


W{a,  1,  x)-- 


(Jezek.) 


15.     Prove  that 


_1  .   %   (-)"^"  p 


2  a„a;" 

re=0 


where 


6?„= 


2ai 

4a2 


«0 

5a, 


ao       1  ?i !  ao" 
0 

4ai 


0 

0 

3an 


(2»-2)a„_i (ri.-l)ao 

7ia„  {n-  l)a„_i «! 

and  obtain  a  similar  expression  for 

(--  \h 

\   2  a„.^•'7    . 
l»=o  J 

(Mangeot,  Jti?*.  de  VEcole  norm.  sup.  (3)  xiv.) 
,•=0  ?*  +  l     oai 


16.     Shew  that 


2  a^x'^ 

0 


10—2 


148  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VII 

where  Sj.  is  the  sura  of  the  rth  powers  of  the  reciprocals  of  the  roots  of  the  equation 

n 
r=0 

(Gambioli,  Bologna  Memdrie,  1892.) 

17.  If  /n(z)  denote  the  nth  derivate  of /(z),  and  if /_„(z)  denote  that  one  of  the  nth. 
integrals  of /(z)  which  has  an  7i-ple  zero  at  2  =  0,  shew  that 

f{z+a;)g{2+x)=    2    fn{z)g-n{x) ; 

and  obtain  Taylor's  series  from  this  result,  by  putting  g  (z)  =  l.  (Guichard.) 

18.  Shew  that,  if  x  be  not  an  integer, 

"         "  ^x+m  +  n 

J'-.nLA^'rmf^x  +  nf* 

as  1/  -*-Q0 ,  provided  that  all  terms  for  which  m  —  n  ai-e  omitted  from  the  summation. 

(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

19.  Sum  the  series 


n  =  -q\{-Yx-a-n      nj'' 


where  the  value  w  =  0  is  omitted,  and  jo,  q  are  positive  integers  to  be  increased  without 
limit. 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 

20.     If  i^(.r)  =  J>"^"'^"''^''^  shew  that 


V  [il--\   e^+i'-^ 


F{x)  =  e-- 


"i    1 


n    ^(l+: 


-x+y- 


7 

and  that  the  function  thus  defined  satisfies  the  relations 


Further,  if 


shew  that 

when 

21.     Shew  that 

[-©"] 

1  + 

V'(2)  =  2  +  2-2  +  32+-=-j^log(l-0y, 

F{x)-=e  2771^^ 

I  l_e-27rM;  I  <  1. 


(Trinity,  1898.) 

i-.)l-G-^.)"][-(-r/.:.)"][-(a-J] 


n  {l-2e-a^cos  (;r+/3p)+e-^'4a  {1  -  2e-a^  cos  (.r-/33)  +  e-2«i,}i 


7     •     2(7-1  ^         , 

Ug  =  k  sui  -^— —  TT,     Py  —  K  cos 


2^(1  -cos  xY^  e 
2g-l 


A:cos- 


where 

and  0<x<2tt. 

22.     If  j  a;  I  <  1  and  a  is  not  a  })ositive  integer,  shew  that 


Z        ^'"  iirix'^  X 

2     = f- 

ji=i  n  —  a      1— e^airj      i^gZani 


fa-l__^,a-l 


t  —  X 


dt, 


where  C  is  a  contour  in  the  ^plane  enclosing  the  points  0,  x. 


(Mildner.) 


(Lerch.) 


THE   EXPANSION  OF   FUNCTIONS   IN   INFINITE  SERIES  149 

23.     If  01  (e),  <f)2(2),  ...   are  any  polynomials   in  z,  and   if  F(z)  be   any  integrable 
function,  and  if  ^i(z),  ^(^2(2), ...  be  polynomials  defined  by  the  equations 

J  a  z  —  a; 

J  a  ?  — X 

/  '  Fia;)  4>,  (.;)  <t>2  (^) ...  <t>.n-i  (^)  '^"^ ^^ ~ t"  ^^'^  '^•^=^'»  (^)' 

/a  Z  —  CO 


J  a       S-X  01  (2)       01  (2)  02  (2)       01 


^^3(2) 


(2)  02  (j)  03  (Z) 


+ 


^/'mC^) 


+ 0.(.)0.(.)...0.(.)  j  ;^^")  *^^")  0.(-)-«^.n(-),— , 


01  (2)  02(2).  •.0m  (2) 

24.     A  system  of  functions  p^  (z),  p^  {z),  p^  (z),  ...  is  defined  by  the  equations 

P(,(z)=l,      p^  +  i  (z)  =  (z2  +  UnZ  +  bn)  fn  (z), 

where  a„  and  6„  are  given  functions  of  n,  which  tend  respectively  to  the  limits  0  and  -  1 
as  n-*-  QC . 

Shew  that  the  region  of  convergence  of  a  series  of  the  form 

2e„p„  (2), 

where  ej,  e^,  ...  are  independent  of  z,  is  a  Cassini's  oval  with  the  foci  +1,  —  1. 

Shew  that  every  function  f{z),  which  is  analytic  on  and  inside  the  oval,  can,  for  points 
inside  the  oval,  be  expanded  in  a  series 

f{z)  =  2(Cn  +  ZCn')pn{z), 


where 


2«  =27nj  ^^"  "^  ^^  ^"  ^^^-^^^^  ^^'      ^"' ""  2^"  /  ^"  ^^^-^^^^  ^^' 


the  integrals  being  taken  round  the  boundary  of  the  region,  and  the  functions  qn  (z)  being 
defined  by  the  equations 

^0 ^'^ ^z^-^-az^h  '     ^"  +  ^  ^^) " 22T.y TTTh —  ^" ^^^-  (Pincherle.) 

Z   -i-aoZ-^Oo  Z   i-ttn  +  i-i  +  On  +  i 

25.     Let  C  be  a  contour  enclosing  the  point  a,  and  let  0(2)  and  f{z)  be  analytic  when 
z  is  on  or  inside  C.     Let  |  ^  j  be  so  small  that 

I  ;0  (2)  I  <  1 2  —  a  I 
when  2  is  on  the  periphery  of  C. 
By  expanding 

^ni  J  c'       'z-a-t(f>{z) 
in  ascending  powers  of  t,  shew  that  it  is  ecpial  to 

Hence,  by  using  j5j^6'3,  6-31,  obtain  Lagrange's  theorem. 


CHAPTER   VIII 

ASYMPTOTIC   EXPANSIONS  AND   SUMMABLE   SERIES 
8"1.     Simple  example  of  an  asymptotic  expansion. 

Consider  the  function  f(x)  =  I     t~'^  e^~^  dt,  where  cc  is  real  and  positive, 
and  the  path  of  integration  is  the  real  axis. 

By  repeated  integrations  by  parts,  we  obtain 

%Aj  tAj  \Aj  tAj  J    X  ^ 

In  connexion  with  the  function  /(x),  we  therefore  consider  the  expression 

(_)n-](^_l)! 


and  we  shall  write 


^  hKy  tA^  tAy  lAj 


in  =  \ 


Then  we  have  j  Umlum-i !  =  (^^  —  1)  ^~^  -^  °c  as  m  -^  go  .  T/ie  smes  %Um  is 
therefore  divergent  for  all  values  of  x.  In  spite  of  this,  however,  the  series 
can  be  used  for  the  calculation  oif{x) ;  this  can  be  seen  in  the  following  way. 

Take  any  fixed  value  for  the  number  n,  and  calculate  the  value  of  Sn- 
We  have 

f{x)-S,,{x)  =  {-Y^-{n^V)V 


and  therefore,  since  e*^~*^l 

''^e'^-^dt    .  ,     ,  ^,.  f^^  dt        ni 


l/(^-)-'S'„(.Oi  =  («+l)!j"  ~^  <  (n  +  !)!£ 


For  values  of  x  which  arc  sufficiently  large,  the  right-hand  member  of  this 
equation  is  very  small.     Thus  if  we  take  x  ^  2??,  we  have 

<f(ar)-Sn(xy<—^  , 


8-1,  8-2]  ASYMPTOTIC   EXPANSIONS  151 

which  for  large  values  of  n  is  very  small.  It  follows  therefore  that  the  value 
of  the  function  f  (x)  can  be  calculated  with  great  accuracy  for  large  values  of  x, 
by  taking  the  sum  of  a  suitable  number  of  terms  of  the  series  "Zum . 

Taking  even  fairly  small  values  of  x  and  n 

55(10)  =  -09152,  and   0</(10)-aS5(10)<-00012. 

The  series  is  on  this  account  said  to  be  an  asymptotic  expansion  of  the 
function  f(x).  The  precise  definition  of  an  asymptotic  expansion  will  now 
be  given. 

8"2.     Definition  of  an  asymptotic  expansion. 
A  divergent  series 

z        z^  z^^ 

in  which  the  sum  of  the  first  {n  +  1)  terms  is  Sn  {z),  is  said  to  be  an  asymptotic 
expansion  of  a  function  f{z)  for  a  given  range  of  values  of  arg^,  if  the 
expression  i2„  {z)  =  z^^  [f{z)  —  Sn  (z)}  satisfies  the  condition 

lira    Rn  (z)  =0      (n  fixed), 

|2r|-»-oo 

even  though  lim  i-Rn(^)i  =  ^     (2^  fixed). 

When  this  is  the  case,  we  can  make 

l^-{/(^)-.Sf,(^)}i<e, 

where  e  is  arbitrarily  small,  by  taking  \z\  sufficiently  large. 

We  denote  the  fact  that  the  series  is  the  asymptotic  expansion  off(z)  by 
writing 

The  definition  which  has  just  been  given  is  due  to  Poincare*.  Special 
asymptotic  expansions  had,  however,  been  discovered  and  used  in  the 
eighteenth  century  by  Stirling,  Maclaurin  and  Euler.  Asymptotic  expan- 
sions are  of  great  importance  in  the  theory  of  Linear  Differential  Equations, 
and  in  Dynamical  Astronomy ;  some  applications  will  be  given  in  subsequent 
chapters  of  the  present  work. 

The  example  discussed  in  |  8"1  clearly  satisfies  the  definition  just 
given  :  for,  when  x  is  positive,  \x'^  {f{^)  —  ^n  (x)} \  <nl  x~^  -  ^  0  as  ^' -»•  cc  . 

For  the  sake  of  simplicity,  in  this  chapter  we  shall  for  the  most  part  consider 
asymptotic  expansions  only  in  connexion  with  real  positive  values  of  the  argument. 
The  theory  for  complex  values  of  the  argument  may  be  discussed  by  an  extension  of  the 
analysis. 

*  Acta  Mathematica,  viii.  (1886),  pp.  295-344. 


152 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VIII 


8 '21.     Another  example  of  an  asymptotic  expansion. 

As  a  second  example,  consider  the  function  f{x\  represented  by  the  series 

where  x>0  and  0<c<l. 

The  ratio  of  the  kih  term  of  this  series  to  the  {k-  l)th  is  less  than  c,  and  consequently 
the  series  converges  for  all  positive  values  of  x.  We  shall  confine  our  attention  to  positive 
values  of  x.     We  have,  when  x>k, 

1     _1_^      A^_:^4.^_ 
^+I•~a;     x'^     x^     x^      x^ 

If,  therefore,  it  were  allowable*  to  expand  each  fraction  — ^  in  this  way,  and  to 

rearrange  the  series  for  f{x)  in  descending  powers  of  x,  we  should  obtain  the  formal  series 

X       x^  x^^ 

where  J„  =  (-)»-iife 

fc=i 

But  this  procedure  is  not  legitimate,  and  in  ftict  2  ^„a-"  diverges.     We  can,  however, 

shew  that  it  is  an  asymptotic  expansion  olfix). 

Forlet  '^»(^)  =  lr'  +  ^'  +  -+^^i- 

Then  '^"^■^')=,!,t  ~  ^'  ^  :^  +  -  +  -^ 


^^y^"^ 


sothat  i/(^)->S„(.-.-)|  =  |  2  (-^y^'^i<^--2i^nc^. 

Now  2  b'd'  converges  for  any  given  value  of  n  and  is  equal  to  C„,  say ;  and  hence 

|/(a;)-*S„(A')|<(7n^-"-2_ 

Consequently  f  {x)  ~  2  AnX''^. 

Example.     If  f  {x)—\     e^  ~  ' dt,  where  x  is  ])ositive  and  the  path  of  integration  is  the 

real  axis,  prove  that 

.  1 1_      1.3      1.3.5 

[In  fact,  it  was  shewn  by  Stokes  in  1857  that 

e^-^dt^+^J^/"      (^  ^         1.3_1.3.5 

6         dt~±-,s/nc     -(^--^3+-3-._-^5^  +  .., 

the  upper  or  lower  sign  is  to  be  taken  according  as  -|7r<argA'<j7r  or  ^7r<ai'g.r<f7r.] 

8'3.     Multiplication  of  asymptotic  expansions. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  two  asymptotic  expansions,  valid  for  a  common 
range  of  values  of  arg^-,  can  be  multiplied  together  in  the  same  way  as 
ordinary  series,  the  result  being  a  new  asymptotic  expansion. 

*  It  is  not  allowable,  since  k  >  x  for  all  terms  of  the  series  after  some  definite  term. 


8-21-8-31]  ASYMPTOTIC   EXPANSIONS  153 

For  let  f{z)'^  2  AmZ'"", 


111  =  0 


»t  =  0 

and  let  8n{z)  and  Tn{z)he  the  sums  of  their  first  (w  +  1)  terms;  so  that, 
n  being  fixed, 

f{z)  -  Sn  (Z)  =  0  (!-"),      </,  (Z)  -  Tn  {z)  =  0  {z^). 

Then,  if  Cm  =  ^o^»r  +  ^i 5^.-1  +  ...  +  ^m^o,  it  is  obvious  that* 

Sr^{z)Tr,{z)=    I    C,,^— +  0(^-"). 
m=0 

But  f(z)  </,  (^)  =  {Sn  (z)  +  0  (z-)]  [Tn  {z)  +  0  (^-")} 

=  8n{z)Tn{z)+0{z-) 
n 

This  result  being  true  for  any  fixed  value  of  n,  we  see  that 

f(z)<f>(z)^  i  (7^^—. 

8*31.     Integration  of  asymptotic  expansions. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  it  is  permissible  to  integrate  an  asymptotic 
expansion  term  by  term,  the  resulting  series  being  the  asymptotic  expansion 
of  the  integral  of  the  function  represented  by  the  original  series. 

00  n 

For  let         /(a;)'^  %  AmX-"",  and  let  Sn(x)=  t  A.nX-"^. 

m  =  2  w  =  2 

Then,  given  any  positive  number  e,  we  can  find  Xq  such  that 

\f{x)  —  Sn{x)\<€\  ^'  ]""■  when  x  >  x^, 


and  therefore 


I    f{x)  dx  —  I     8n  {x)  dx\  ^  \     \f{x)  —  Sn  {x)  \  dx 


< 


.n—i 


{n  -  1  )*•"-! 
But  /Js„(.)^.4^+^4j-....  +  ^__4^, 

and  therefore  1     f(x)dx'^  S   , ,^ . 

On   the  other  hand,  it  is  not  in  general  permissible  to  differentiate  an  asymptotic 
expansion;   this  may  be  seen  by  considering  e~'^sin(6'*). 

*  See  §  2-11 ;  we  use  o  (2-")  to  denote  any  function  \f/  (2)  such  that  2"  i/-  (2)  -*-  0  as  I  2  I  -*  30  . 


154  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VIII 

8"32.     Uniqueness  of  an  asymptotic  expansion. 

A  question  naturally  suggests  itself,  as  to  whether  a  given  series  can  be 
the  asymptotic  expansion  of  several  distinct  functions.  The  answer  to  this 
is  in  the  affirmative.  To  shew  this,  we  first  observe  that  there  are  functions 
L  (x)  which  are  represented  asymptotically  by  a  series  all  of  whose  terms  are 
zero,  i.e.  functions  such  that  lim  a;"X  (x)  =  0  for  every  fixed  value  of  n.     The 

a;-*- 00 

function  e~*  is  such  a  function  when  x  is  positive.    The  asymptotic  expansion* 
of  a  function  J(x)  is  therefore  also  the  asymptotic  expansion  of 

J  {x)  +  L  (x). 

On  the  other  hand,  a  function  cannot  be  represented  by  more  than  one  distinct 
asymptotic  expansion  over  the  whole  of  a  given  range  of  values  of  z  ;   for  if 

»i=0  m=0 

then  ii,^'^(^o+4-^  +  -  +  ^'-^o-f-...-ff)  =  0, 

which  can  only  be  if  Aq=Bo;   Ai  =  Bj^,  — 

Important  examples  of  asymptotic  expansions  will  be  discussed  later,  in  connexion 
with  the  Gamma-function  (Chapter  xii)  and  Bessel  functions  (Chapter  xvii). 

8'4.     Methods  of  '  summing  '  series. 

We  have  seen  that  it  is  possible  to  obtain  a  development  of  the  form 

fix)  =  t  A^x-'^  +  Rn  {x), 

m  =  l 

where  Rn  (x)  -^  oc  as  w  -^  cc  ,  and  the  series    X  AfnX~'^  does  not  converge. 

m  =  l 

We  now  consider  what  meaning,  if  any,  can  be  attached  to  the  '  sum '  of 
a  non-convergent  series.  That  is  to  say,  given  a  set  of  numbers  aj,  a^,  ..-, 
we  wish  to  formulate  definite  rules  by  which  we  can  obtain  from  them  a 

00  CO 

number  S  such  that  S  =  S  a^  if  X  a.^  converges,  and  such  that  8  exists 

n==0  n=0 

when  this  series  does  not  converge. 

8'41.     Borel's'f  method  of  summation. 
We  have  seen  (|  7"81)  that 

00  Too 

S  UnZ''  =       e~f  6  (tz)  dt, 

«  =  ()  Jo 


00    ,,    fn  ,?i. 

where  (}>  (tz)  =  S     —  ^—  ,  the  equation  certainly  being  true  inside  the  circle 

*  It  has  been  shewn  that  when  the  coefficients  in  the  expansion  satisfy  certain  inequalities, 
there  is  only  one  analytic  function  with  that  asymptotic  expansion.  See  Fhil.  Trans.  213,  a, 
pp.  279-313. 

t  Borel,  Lerons  sur  les  Series  Divergeiites. 


8-32-8-43]  SUMMABLE   SERIES  155 

of  convergence  of  2  ftn^".     If  the  integral  exists  at  points  z  outside  this 

w  =  0 

00 

circle,  we  define  the  '  Borel  sum '  of  S  a^z^  to  mean  the  integral. 

M  =  0 

00 

Thus,  whenever  It{£)<\,  the  '  Borel  sum  '  of  the  series  2  z^^  is 

!  W  =  0 

If  the  *  Borel  sum '  exists  we  say  that  the  series  is  '  summable  {B)! 

8'42.     Euler's*  method  of  summation. 

A  method,  practically  due  to  Euler,  is  suggested  by  the  theorem  of  §  3'7l ; 

00  00 

the  '  sum  '  of  S  a„  may  be  defined  as   lim      2  a^a;",  when  this  limit  exists. 

»=0  a;-*-l-0  w=0 

Thus  the  '  sum  '  of  the  series  1  —  1+1  —  1  +  ...  would  be 
lim    {\  — X  ■\-x^  —  ...)=    lim   {1  +  x)~^  =  \. 

a;-»-l-0  a;^l-0 

8"43.     Cesar os^  method  of  summation,  ' 

Let  5,1  =  «!  +  tta  +  ...  +  an',  then  if  S  =  lim  - (si+s.2+  ...  +  Sn)   exists,  we 

»l-*-00    ^ 

00 

say  that    S  a„   is  'summable   (CI),'  and   that  its   sum  (CI)   is  ^.      It  is 

M=l 

00 

necessary  to  establish  the  'condition  of  consistency  J:,'  namely  that  *S/=  S  an 
when  this  series  is  convergent. 

00  w 

To  obtain  the  required  result,  let  %  am  =  s,    X  s^  =  nSn ;  then  we  have 

w  =  l  w=l 

to  prove  that  Sn-^s. 


Given  e,  we  can  choose  n  such  that 

so  jS  — s,jj<  e. 

Then,  if  v  >  n,  we  have 


n+p 


<  €  for  all  values  of  p,  and 


S,  =  a^  +  ajl-  -)  +  ...  +  ttn  (l  -  ^^^-^)  +  f'n+i  fl  -  H 


1--    +...+aJl 


V 


Since  1,  1  —  v~\  1  —  2i^  \  ...  is  a  positive  decreasing  sequence,  it  follows 
from  Abel's  inequality  (§  2"301)  that 


"n-ri 


l-l)  +  an^.{l 


)+  ...+ajl <    l-~ 

\  V/  \  V       /  \  V      J  \  V 


*  Instit.  Calc.  Diff.  (1755).     See  Borel,  loc.  cit.  Introduction. 
t  Bulletin  des  Sciences  Math.  s6r.  2,  t.  xiv.  p.  114. 

t  See  the  end  of  §  8-4. 


156  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VIII 

Therefore 

S^-\a,  +  aJl--]  +  ...+an(l-  ^~^^]l\<  (1  -  - )  e. 


Making  v  ^- oo  ,  we  see  that,  if  >S^  be  any  of  the  limit  points  (§  2"21)  of  S^, 
then 

8—  ^  ami  -^e. 
Therefore,  since  |  s  —  5„  |  ^  e,  we  have 

This  inequality  being  true  for  every  positive  value  of  e  we  infer,  as  in  §  2*2 1, 
that  S  =  s;  that  is  to  say  S^  has  the  unique  limit s ;  this  is  the  theorem  which 
had  to  be  proved. 

Example  1.     Frame  a  definition  of  'uniform  sammability  (Cl)  of  a  series  of  variable 
terms.' 

Example  2.     If  bn,v'^bn+i,v'^0  when  n<v,  and  if,  when  n  is  fixed,  lim  6w,i»=l,  and 
if  2  am=s,  then  lim  J   2  a,ibn,v\=S. 

1)1  =  1  l—^-OO    \)l=l  j 

8  "431.     Cemro's  general  method  of  srimrnation. 

00  V 

A  series  2  a»  is  said  to  be  'simimable  (Cr)'  if  lim    2  anhn,v  exists,  where 

M  =  0  v-*-:o  w  =  0 

-1 


6o..=i,  i,,.=  |(^i4-^,^:^J  (,i  +  Mr2^J-A'  +  r-i 

It  follows  from  §  8'43  example  2  that  the  'condition  of  consistency'  is  satisfied  ;  in 
fact  it  can  be  proved*  that  if  a  series  is  summable  {Cr')  it  is  also  summable  {Cr)  when 
r>r' ;  the  condition  of  consistency  is  the  particular  case  of  this  result  when  r=0. 

8*44.      The  method  of  summation  of  Riesz\. 

A  more  extended  method  of '  summing '  a  series  than  the  preceding  is  by  means  of 


lim 


2    (1-^)  a. 


in  which  X„  is  any  real  function  of  n  which  tends  to  infinity  with  n.     A  series  for  which 
this  limit  exists  is  said  to  be  'summable  {Rr)  with  sum  function  X,,.' 

8*5.     Hardy's  j  convergence  theorem. 

00 

Let  S  tt)i  he  a  series  which  is  summable  (Cl).     Then  if 

n  =  l 

an  =  0  (l/n), 

00 

the  series  %  a„  converges. 

*  Bromvvich,  Infinite  Series,  §  122. 
t   Comptes  Rendiis,  cxLix.  pp.  18-21. 

:;;  Proc.  London  Math.  Sac.  ser.  2,  vol.  viii.  pp.  302-304.     For  the  proof  here  given,  we  are 
indebted  to  Mr  Littlewood. 


8-431-8-5] 


SUMMABLE   SERIES 


157 


Let  «„  =  ai  +  tta  +  . . .  +  a„ ;  then  since  2  an  is  summable  (CI),  we  have 


n=l 


S1  +  S2+  ...  +  Sn  =  n{s  +  o  (1)|, 


where  s  is  the  sum  (01)  of  2)  a„. 

M  =  l 


Let 
and  let 


Sm-S=tm,      (m=  1,  2,  ...  W), 
*i  "r  t2  "T  •  •  •  'T  *n  '''^  ^n  • 


With  this  notation,  it  is  sufficient  to  shew  that,  if  | «« |  <  K^n~^,  where  K 
is  independent  of  n,  and  if  0-^  =  ^.0(1),  then  <,i  -*-  0  as  w  -*-  00  . 

Suppose  first  that  a^,  a^,  ...  are  real.  Then  if  tn  does  not  tend  to  zero 
there  is  some  positive  number  h  such  that  there  are  an  unlimited  number  of 
the  numbers  tn  which  satisfy  either  (i)  tn>h  or  (ii)  tn<  —  h.  We  shall  shew 
that  either  of  these  hypotheses  implies  a  contradiction.  Take  the  former*, 
and  choose  n  so  that  L  >  h. 


Then,  when  r=0,  1,  2,  .. 


f'n+r 


<K/n. 


Now  plot  the  points  Pr  whose  coordinates  are  (r,  tn+r)  in  a  Cartesian 
diagram.  Since  tn+r+i  — tn+r=  ^n+r+i,  the  slope  of  the  line  FyPr+i  is  less 
than  0  =  arc  tan  (K/n). 

Therefore  the  points  Pq,  Pi.  P2,  •••  lie  above  the  line  y  =  h  —  xtan0. 
Let  Pic  be  the  last  of  the  points  Po,Pi, ...  which  lies  on  the  left  of  cc  —  h  cot  6, 
so  that  k ^h  cot  6. 

Draw  rectangles  as  shewn  in  the  figure.  The  area  of  these  rectangles 
exceeds  the  area  of  the  triangle  bounded  by  y  =  h  —  x  tan  6  and  the  axes ; 
that  is  to  say 

<^n+k  ~  ^n—\  =  tn  +  tn+i  +  •  •  •  +  tn+k 

>  ^h^ cot  e  =  ^h'K-^n. 

*  The  reader  will  see  that  the  latter  hypothesis  involves  a  contradiction  by  using  arguments 
of  a  precisely  similar  character  to  those  which  will  be  employed  in  dealing  with  the  former 
hypothesis. 


158  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  VIII 

But  I  (Tn+k  —  CTfi-i  I  ^  I  O-n+k  I  +  i  0"n-i  | 

=  (n  +  k).o(l)  +  {n-l).o(l), 
=  n.  o(l), 
since  k  ^  hnK~\  and  h,  K  are  independent  of  n. 

Therefore,  for  a  set  of , values  of  n  tending  to  infinity, 

which  is  impossible  since  ^h^K~^  is  not  o  (1)  as  n  ^-^  cc  . 

This  is  the  contradiction  obtained  on  the  hypothesis  that  lim  i„  ^  /i  >  0 ; 
therefore  limifn^O.  Similarly,  by  taking  the  corresponding  case  in  which 
tni^  —  h,^'e  arrive  at  the  result  lim^^^O.     Therefore  since   lim^w^lim^^, 

we  have  lim  tn  =  lim  tn  ^  0, 

and  so  tn  -^  0. 

00 

That  is  to  say  s„  -^  s,  and  so  2  an  is  convergent  and  its  sum  is  s. 

w  =  l 

If  an  be  complex,  we  consider  R  (an)  and  /  (an)  separately,  and  find 

OC  CO 

that  2  Il(an)  and  S  I  (an)  converge  by  the  theorem  just  proved,  and  so 

00 

S  ttn  converges. 

n-l 

The  reader  will  see  in  Chapter  IX  that  this  result  is  of  great  importance 
in  the  modern  theory  of  Fourier  series. 

Corollary.     If  an{$)  be  a  function  of  ^  such  that  2  «re(|)  is  uniformly  summable  {C  1) 
throughout  a  domain  of  values  of  ^,  and  if  |  «„  (^)  |</ui~\  where  K  is  independent  of  ^, 
2  Un  ($)  converges  uniformly  throughout  the  domain. 

n=l 

For,  retaining  the  notation  of  the  preceding  section,  if  tn{^)  does  not  tend  to  zero 
uniformly,  we  can  find  a  positive  number  h  independent  of  n  and  ^  such  that  an  infinite 
sequence  of  vahies  of  n  can  be  found  for  which  t„  {^n)>h  or  tn  {^n)<  -  h  for  some  point  |„ 
of  the  domain*;  the  vahie  of  ^„  depends  on  the  vahie  of  ?i  under  consideration. 

We  then  find,  as  in  the  original  theorem, 

^h'^K-hi<n.o{l) 

for  a  set  of  values  of  ?i  tending  to  infinity.     The  contradiction  implied  in  the  inequality 
shews  +  that  h  does  not  exist,  and  so  tn{^)-*-0  uniformly. 

*  It  is  assumed  that  a,,  (^)  is  real ;  the  extension  to  complex  variables  can  be  made  as  in  the 
former  theorem.     If  no  such  number  )i  existed,  <„(^)  would  tend  to  zero  uniformly. 

t  It  is  essential  to  observe  that  the  constants  involved  in  the  iuequality  do  not  depencj  on  !„. 
For  if,  say,  K  depended  on  ^„,  A'""'  would  really  be  a  function  of  n  and  might  be  o  (1)  qua  function 
of  n,  and  the  inequality  would  not  imply  a  contradiction. 


ASYMPTOTIC   EXPANSIONS   AND   SUMMABLE   SERIES  159 

REFERENCES. 

H.  PoiNCAR^,  Acta  Mathematica,  vol.  viil,  (1886),  pp.  295-344. 

E.  BoEEL,  Lecona  sur  leu  Series  Divergentes. 

T.  J.  I'a.  Bromwich,  Theory  of  Infinite  Series,  Ch.  xi. 

E.  W.  Barnes,  Phil  Trans,  of  the  Royal  Society,  206,  a,  pp.  249-297. 

G.  H.  Hardy  and  J.  E.  Littlewood,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  ser.  2,  vol.  xi.  pp.  1-16*. 

G.  N.  Watson,  Phil.  Trans,  of  the  Royal  Society,  213,  a,  pp.  279-313. 

S.  Chapman  t,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  ser.  2,  vol.  ix.  pp.  369-409. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

-=«^«         1      2  !     4 : 
— -.  dt T  +  ^ 


Too  g-x«  1      2!      4! 

1.     Shew  that  I     y^~^' "'^~~-  -^+^- 


when  X  is  real  and  positive. 

2.  Discuss  the  representation  of  the  function 

f{x)  =  ^''  J{t)e^-dt 

(where  x  is  supposed  real  and  positive,  and  </>  is  a  function  subject  to  certain  general  con- 
ditions) by  means  of  the  series 

y-.^N    <^W    <^'(Q)  I  ^"(Q) 

■'  ^  X  X^  X^ 

Shew  that  in  certain  cases  (e.g.  (f){t)  =  e"^)  the  series  is  absolutely  convergent,  and 
represents  f{x)  for  large  positive  values  of  x  ;  but  that  in  certain  other  cases  the  series  is 
the  asymptotic  expansion  of  f{x). 

3.  Shew  that  the  divergent  series 

1  ^  g-l  ^  (a-l)(a-2)^    ^ 
z         z^  z^ 

is  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  the  function 

e'z-"  I     e~''x"~'^dx 

•  .  .  J  ^ 

for  large  positive  values  of  z. 

4.  Shew  that  if,  when  x>0, 

/w=/;{iog»+iog(j-i,.)}'^.-, 

J.V,  J-/     \  1  -^1  -^2  -^3 

Shew  also  that  /  (x)  can  be  expanded  into  an  absolutely  convergent  series  of  the  form 

■^^^^=1  ix  +  l)ix  +  2)...ix  +  ky  (Schlomilch.) 

5.  Shew  that  if  the  series  1+0+0-1+0+1+0  +  0-1  +  ...,  in  which  two  zeros 
precede  each  —1  and  one  zero  precedes  each  +1,  be  'summed'  by  Cesaro's  method, 
its  sum  is  f .  (Euler,  Borel.) 

6.  Shew  that  the  series  1  -  2  !  +  4  !  —  . . .  cannot  be  summed  by  Borel's  method,  but  the 
series  1  +  0  —  2!+0  +  4!  +  ...  can  be  so  summed. 

*  This  paper  contains  many  references  to  recent  developments  of  the  subject. 
t  A  bibliography  of   the  literature  of  summable  series   will   be  found   on   p.    372   of   this 
memoir. 


CHAPTER   IX 

FOURIER  SERIES 

9'1.     Definition  of  Fourier  series*. 
Series  of  the  type 

l-tto  +  (tti  cos  x  +  hi  sin  x)  +  (a^ cos  2w  +  62 sin  2x)  +  ... 

00 

=  ^ao  +  2  (an  cos  na;  +  bn  sin  wa;), 

where  an,  bn  are  independent  of  a;,  are  of  great  importance  in  many  investi- 
gations.    They  are  called  trigonometrical  series. 

If  a  function /(^)  exists  such  that  I      \f{t)\  dt  exists  as  a  Riemann  integi'al 
or  as  an  improper  integral,  and  such  that 

7ra„=  I      f(t)  cos  ntdt,    7rbn=  I      f(t)sinntdt, 

J  -TV  J  —n 

then  the  trigonometrical  series  is  called  a  Foiirier  series. 

Trigonometrical  series  first  appeared  in  analysis  in  connexion  with  the  investigations 
of  Daniel  Bernoulli  on  vibrating  strings ;  d'Alembert  had  previously  solved  the  equation  ot 

motion^  =  a2-^  in  the  form  y  =  \  {f{x  +  at)-\-f{x  —  at)},  where  y=f{x)  is  the  initial  shape 

of  the  string  starting  from  rest ;  and  Bernoulli  shewed  that  a  formal  solution  is 

"    ,      .    nnx        nnat 
y—  2   On  sm  —j—  cos  — j —  , 
11=1  t  I 

the  fixed  ends  of  the  string  being  (0,  0)  and  (l,  0) ;  and  he  asserted  that  this  was  the  most 
general  solution  of  the  problem.  This  appeared  to  d'Alembert  and  Euler  to  be  impossible, 
since  such  a  series,  having  period  21,  could  not  possibly  represent  such  a  function  ast 
cx{l  —  x)  when  t  =  0.  A  controversy  arose  between  these  mathematicians,  of  which  an 
account  is  given  in  Hobson's  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable. 

Fourier,  in  his  The'orle  de  la  Chalevr,  investigated  a  number  of  trigonometrical  series 
and  shewed  that  in  a  largo  niunber  of  particular  cases  a  Fourier  series  actually  converged 

*  Throughout  this  chapter  (except  in  §  9'11)  it  is  supposed  that  all  the  numbers  involved  are 
real. 

t  This  function  gives  a  simple  form  to  the  initial  shape  of  the  string. 


91,  911]  FOURIER   SERIES  161 

to  the  sum  f{x).  Poisson  attempted  a  general  proof  of  this  theorem.  Two  proofs  were 
given  by  Cauchy;  these  proofs  are  concerned  with  rather  particular  classes  of  functions 
and  one  is  invalid. 

In  1829,  Dirichlet  gave  the  first  rigorous  proof*  that,  for  a  general  class  of  functions, 
the  Fourier  series,  defined  as  above,  does  converge  to  the  sum  f{x).  A  modification  of  this 
proof  was  given  later  by  Bonnet  t. 

The  result  of  Dirichlet,  stated  in   modern  phraseology,  is  that  if /(.a?)  is  defined  in 

the  range  (-tt,  it)  and    I       |/(0 1  ^^   exists   and,   further,   if  f{x)   is  defined   by  the 

equation 

f{x  +  2n)=f{x) 

outside  the  range  ( -  tt,  tt),  then,  provided  that  J 

7ra„=  I      f(t)co8ntdt,     7r6„=  I      f{t)sinntdt, 
the  series  |ao+  2  {uncosiix-i-bnsinnx)  converges  to  the  sum  ^  {/(•^  +  0)+/(^  — 0)}  pro- 

n=l 

vided  that  these  limits  exist  and  that  f{x)  has  limited  total  fluctuation  in  an  interval  of 
finite  length  of  which  x  is  an  interior  point. 

Later,  Riemarm  and  Cantor  developed  the  theory  of  trigonometrical  series  generally, 
while  still  more  recently  Hurwitz,  F^jer  and  others  have  investigated  properties  of  Fourier 
series  when  the  series  does  not  necessarily  converge.  Thus  Fejer  has  proved  the  re- 
markable theorem  that  a  Fourier  series  (even  if  not  convergent)  is  'summable  (Cl)' 
at    all    points    at    which   f{x±0)   exist,   and    its    sum    (Cl)   is    ^  {/(^  +  0)+/(.r-0)}, 

provided  that   I       \f{t)  \  dt  converges.     The  investigation  of  the  convergence  of  Fourier 

series  which  we  shall  give  later  is  based  on  this  result. 

For  a  fuller  account  of  investigations  subsequent  to  Riemann,  the  reader  is  referred  to 
Hobson's  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable. 

9*11.     Nature  of  the  region  within  which  a  trigonometrical  series  converges. 
Consider  the  series 

^  ao  +  2  (a,j  cos  nz  +  bn  sin  nz), 

where  z  may  be  complex.     Writing  e'^  =  ^,  the  series  becomes 

l^ao  +  J^  1^  («„  -  ib,,)  ^ « + 1  (c/„  +  ib^)  t  -  «| . 

This  Laurent  series  will  converge,  if  it  converges  at  all,  in  a  region  in  which  a^\(\^by 
where  a,  b  are  positive  constants. 

But,  if  z  =  x-\-iy.,  ICI  =  ^  ^  ^^^  ^'^  we  get,  as  the  region  of  convergence  of  the  trigono- 
metrical series,  the  strip  in  the  z  plane  defined  by  the  inequality 

log  a  ^-y^  log  6. 

*  Crelle's  Journal,  Bd.  iv. 

t  Memoires  des  Sava7its  etrangers  of  the  Belgian  Academy,  vol.  xxiii.  Bonnet  employs  the 
second  mean  value  theorem  directly,  while  Dirichlet's  original  proof  makes  use  of  arguments 
precisely  similar  to  those  by  which  that  theorem  is  proved. 

X  The  numbers  a,^,  6„  are  called  the  Fourier  constants  of  /(x).  The  letters  «„,  b,i  will 
be  employed  iu  this  sense  throughout  §^  9-1-9  "O.     It  is  easily  seen  that  the  integrals  defining 

a„,  b,^  converge  absolutely  if  I        l/(f)  i  dt  converges. 

W.   M.   A.  11 


162  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

The  case  which  is  of  the  greatest  importance  in  practice  is  that  in  which  a  =  6  =  l,  and 
the  strip  consists  of  a  single  line,  namely  the  real  axis. 

Example  1.     Let 

/  (3)  =  sin  2 --sin  22+  -sin  Zz-  "Sin4z+..., 
where  z=x-\-iy. 

Writing  this  in  the  form 

/(2)=  _  1  i  U^-  1  e2u  +  l  ^3.^  _  _  J^  +  1  j;  L-iz^  _  1  g-2u  +  1  e-3i^  -  ...  j 

we  notice  that  the  first  series  converges*  only  if  y  ^  0,  and  the  second  only  if  y  ^0. 
Writing  x  in  place  of  z  (x  being  real),  we  see  that  by  Abel's  theorem  (§  3-71), 


f  (.r)  =  lim  (r sin x-  -  7'^  sin  2x  +  5  '"^ sin 3x— ...) 
-^  lini  I  -  L  ^•  [re'^  -  \  r^e"-'--"  +  \  r^e^*^  -  . . .  ) 


This  is  the  limit  of  one  of  the  values  of 

-  ^i  log  ( 1  +  re'*)  +  \i  log  ( 1  +  re  -  '*), 

and  as  )•-»►  1  (if  -it  <  x  <  n),  this  tends  to  ^x  +  kn,  where  k  is  some  integer. 

X    z' ...  Vi  ~  1  sin  71JC  1        n 

Now    2    — •  converges  uniformly  (§  3-35  example  1)  and  is  therefore  con- 

tinuous  in  the  range  —7r  +  8^x^Tr~8,  where  8  is  any  positive  constant. 

Since  hx  is  continuous,  k  has  the  same  value  wherever  x  lies  in  the  range  ;  and  putting 
.v  =  0,  we  see  that  ^=0. 

Therefore,  when  —  tt  <  a*  <  tt,  f  ix)  —  \x. 

But,  when  tt  <  x  <i  Stt, 

/(.r)=/(.^-2,r)  =  |(a7-27r)  =  ^;r-7r, 

and  generally  if  (2ji  — 1)  tt  <  .r  <  (2«+l)  tt, 

f{x)=-\x-'Mz. 

We  have  thu.s  arrived  at  an  example  in  which  fix)  is  not  represented  by  a  single 
analytical  expression. 

It  must  be  observed  that  this  phenomenon  can  only  occur  when  the  strip  in  which  the 
Fourier  series  converges  is  a  single  line.  For  if  the  strip  is  not  of  zero  breadth,  the 
.\ssociated  Laurent  series  converges  in  an  aunulus  of  non-zero  breadth  and  represents  an 
analytic  function  of  f  in  that  annulus  ;  and,  since  ^  is  an  analytic  function  of  s,  the  Fourier 
series  represents  an  analytic  function  of  z ;  such  a  series  is  given  by 

r  sin  X  —  \r'^  sin  2.r+ ^/^  sin  3.r  —  . . . , 
where  0  <  r  <  1  ;  its  sum  is  arc  tan ,  the  arc  tan  always  representing  an  angle 

J.  ~j~  V  COS  oc 

between  •^\it. 

Example  2.     W^hen  -  tt  ^  x  ^  n, 

^   (-)"-icos>i.x'       1      2      1    2 
n=i  n-  12  4 

*  The  series  do  converge  ii  tj  =  0,  see  §  2'31  example  2. 


91 2]  FOURIER  SERIES  163 

The  series  converges  only  when  x  is  real ;  by  §  3'34  the  convergence  is  then  absolute 
and  uniform. 

Since  ^^=sina;-|8in2a;+Jsin3.r- ...        (  — w +8  <^  ^  «•  — 8,  8  >  0), 

and  this  series  converges  uniformly,  we  may  integrate  term-by-term  from  0  to  :r  (i;^  4'7), 
and  consequently 

1     9       "(-)"-!  (1 -COS  wo;) 

4  n=l  li 

That  is  to  say,  when  —ir  +  h^x^ir-b, 

4  n=i  n^ 

where  C  is  a  constant,  at  present  undetermined. 

But  since  the  series  on  the  right  converges  uniformly  throughout  the  range  —tr^x^ir, 
its  sum  is  a  continuous  function  of  x  in  this  extended  range ;  and  so,  proceeding  to  the 
limit  when  x-*-  ±  tt,  we  see  that  the  last  equation  is  still  true  when  x=  ±ir. 

To  determine  C,  integrate  each  side  of  the  equation  (§  4*7)  between  the  limits  —  tt,  tt  ; 
and  we  get 

277(7-^773  =  0. 
D 

^  ,,  1        „       1      „  "^     (— )"~^C0S7l^  ,  , 

Consequently  —it^—-x^=  2  ^ — ~ ^ ( -  tt  ^  .r  ^  it). 

Lai  4  7J  =  1  '*' 

*  Example  3.     By  writing  tt  —  2^7  for  x  in  example  2,  shew  that 
sm^nx  (=^x  {tt  —x)  (0  ^ x  ^  tt), 


„=i      n^       \  =  1{it\x\-x^\  (-TT^x^ir). 

9"12.     Values  of  the  coefficients  in  terms  of  the  sum  of  a  trigonometrical 
series. 

00 

Let  the  trigonometrical  series  |  Co  +  S  (c„  cos  nx  +  dn  sin  nx)  be  uniformly 

w  =  l 

convergent  in  the  range  (—  tt,  tt)  and  let  its  sum  hef(x).     Using  the  obvious 

results 

f  ^     (=0     (mi^n), 

I       cos  mx  cos  nxax  ■{  \  ,  ^\ 

j  _„  l=-jr     {m  =  ni=  0), 

f      •  ■  ,     (=0     (m^n),  r    ^       o 

sin  mx  sin  nxax  ■{  ;  ,  ^^  I      aa;  =  27r, 

J-^  i=7r     (m  =  ni=0),         J  _„ 

00 

we  find,  on  multiplying  the  equation  |Co+  S  (Cn  cos  7iic  +  o?,i  sin  wa;)  =/(.t) 

w  =  l 

by*  coswa;  or  by  sinna;  and  integrating  term-by-term  (§  4"7), 
7rCn=l      f{x)cosnxdx,      7rdn=  \      f(x)  sin  nxdx. 

J  —n  J  —n 

Corollary.     A  trigonometrical  series  uniformly  convergent  in  the  range  ( -  tt,  tt)  is  a 
Fourier  sseriess. 

*  Multiplying  by  these  factors  does  not  destroy  the  uniformity  of  the  convergence. 

11—2 


164  the  processes  of  analysis  [chap.  ix 

9-2.    F^jer's  theorem*. 

The  Fourier  series  of  a  function  f{x)  is  summahle-f  (01)  at  all  points  x 
at  which  the  limits  f{x-\-  0),  f{x  -  0)  exist.     And  its  sum  (0  1)  is 

i{/(^  +  0)+/(a.-0)}. 

In  accordance  with  §  9-1,  let/(0  be  such  that  I      |/(01  dt  converges,  and 

J  —It 

let  I     f  (t)  cos  ntdt=  Iran,      I     f  (t)  sin  ntdt  =  7rhn. 

J    -IT  J     -It 

m 

Also,  let    ^ao  =  Ao,    an  cos  nx  +  bnsinnx  =  An  (x),     X  An{x)  =  Sm{x). 

n=0 

Then  we  have  to  prove  that 

lim  -  {^0  +  S,  (x)  +  S,{x)+...+  Sm-,  (x)]  =^{f(x  +  0)  +f{x  -  0)}, 

if  f(x  +  0)  and  f(x  —  0)  exist. 
It  is  easy  to  see  that  J 

m-  1 

^0+2  Sn{x)  =  mAo  +  {m-l)A,(x)  +  {m-2)A^{x)  +  ...+Am-i{x) 

1    /■'^ 

=  -         [^m  +  (m  -  1) cos (x-t)-^  (m  -2)cos2{x- t)  +  ... 

+  cos  {m  -  l){x-t)\f  it)  dt 
sm^m(x-t)^.^^^^^ 


27rj_^    sm^^{x  —  t) 
1    ['^'^•^    sin"  ^m(x  —  t) 


27rj_^+,    sin^i(^--0  -^         ^' 

if /(O  be  defined  outside  the  range  (-  tt,  tt)  by  the  equation /(*  +  Stt)  =f(t). 

Dividing  the  range  of  integration  into  the  ranges  {—tt  +  x,  x)  and  (x,  tt+x), 
and  writing  ^  =  a;  ±  2^  in  the  respective  ranges,  we  get 

A       ""v^  o  /  N       1  f^'^sin^m^  .,        ^,,    ,.      1  fi^'sin'md  .  .      . 

A,+  t  Sn  («^)  =  ^       ^.Tr^/  -^  +  2e)de  +  ^       -^-^  fix  -  26)  dd. 

Consequently  it  is  sufficient  to  prove  that§,  if  a  be  independent  of  m  and 
0<  a'^^TT,  then 

1  p  ^_^'!}0j.^^  ^  2^  ^^  _  ^^^  1  p  sm'^^^    (^  _  2^)  d^-iTT/ U-0) 


m 

as  wi  ^-  X 


Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  lviii.  pp.  51-69.  f  See  §  8-43. 

It  is  obvious  tliat,  if  in  the  second  line  we  -pwt  e»(*-0  =  X,  then 

m  +  [m  -  1)  (X  +  X-i)  +  (m  _  2)  (X2  +  X"^)  +  . . .  +  (X»»-i  +  X^-™) 

=  (l-X)-i  {Xi-"'  +  X'-i-«-f-...+X-i  +  l-X-X2-  ...-X"'} 

=  (1  -  X)--'  {Xi-'»  -  2X  +  X»'+i ;  =  (X*  -  x-i)-2  (xi™  -  x-^'")2. 
§  The   reason  for  investigating  the  integrals  with  a  as  their  upper  limit  will  be  apparent 

J    fl.O'J 


in  §  9-23 


92]  FOURIER  SERIUS  166 

To  prove  the  first  of  these  results*  we   observe,   on   integrating   the 
equation 

1  sm^  =  i  m  +  (m  -  1 )  cos  2^  +  . . .  +  cos  2  (m  -  1 )  ^, 

2  sin'^ 

fi'sin^m^  „     , 
that  -.  „^-  aff  =  it7rm. 

Jq    sin^^ 

Also,  if^7r>a>S>0  and  8  is  independent  of  w, 

1  r^sin^m^  ,.     I  f'   de        .         ^  ^.       . 

—         .  „^   a0  <—  I      .     -^  <  itirmr^  cosec'^o  -*►  0  as  m  -»-  oo  . 

mj s   sm'^^  mj s  sin^S 

Now,  given  an  arbitrary  positive  number  e,  we  canf  choose  S  ^  a  such  that 

|/(^  +  2^)-/(a;  +  0)|<6 

whenever  0  <  0^8.     This  choice  of  8  is  obviously  independent  of  m. 

.      Then 

1   r*  sin^m^  . .        -,^,  ,^      1   r^sin^m^,  ,.        ^^,       ..        „.,   ,^ 
mjo    sin^^  -^  ^  mjo    sin26^   ^-^  /    ^  v  /) 

1  ^/       /^^  f^^sin' 
m-^  ^         Wo      sii 

1   r*  sin^m^ 


sin^C7 


+ 


m  J  s    sin' 


^f{x+2d)de 


1  ^/       /^^  r^'^sin^m^  ,^ 


=  I1  +  I2  +  IS  +  li,    say. 
Now  I,=  i-7rf{x+0), 


^1 1  ^  -  •  ,^    /(^  +  20)  -  f{x  +  0)\de 


mjo      sin-t^ 

Also        i/3|  +  i/4i<,-j^,J^'^{i/(^  + 2^)1 +  1/(^  +  0)1^^ 

-0, 
as  m  ^-  oc  ,  since  the  integral  converges  and  8  is  independent  of  m. 
Consequently,  whatever  positive  value  e  may  have, 

1  ( ^^  ^in^  mO  ,,        ^^,   ,^      ,      ..        _J 


^'™   \\m\        ^r.^  -f^""  +  ^^^  ^^  ~  ^'^f^''  +  ^H 


^^Tre; 


•  The  proof  of  the  second  is  precisely  similar  to  that  of  the  first, 
t  On  the  assumption  that/(ar  +  0)  exists. 


166  THE   PROCESSES   OF  ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

and  consequently,  by  the  definition  of  a  limit, 

^^oo w  Jo     sin-a 
Similarly,  i{f{oc  —  0)  exists, 

»t^-oo  wj  0     sin  (7 
Therefore,  if  f(oo  +  0),  /(^  —  0)  both  exist,  and  if  /      {/(t)  \  dt  converges, 

J    —IT 


then 


If         "'-1  ) 

lim  -    ^4-  S  ^n(^)    =i{/(^  + 0) +/(«.- 0)}. 

m-*-x   III'  J.  n=l  J 


Corollary.     Let /(a*)  be  continuous  in  the  range  a^x^b.     Since  continuity  implies 

uniform  continuity  (§  3*61),  the  choice  of  b,  corresponding  to  any  value  of  x  in  this  range, 

is  independent  of  .?7,  and  the  upper  bound  of /(a?+0)  is  independent  of  x.     Therefore  the 

If        ™-i  1 

upper  bounds  of  |  /i  ] ,  |  /s  |  and  |  /j  |  are  independent  of  x,  and  consequently  —  j  Jq  +  2  «SV  {x)  \ 

tends  to  the  limit  f{x)  uniformly  throughout  the  interval  a^x^b. 

9"21.     Riemanns  lemma*. 

Let  yjr  (6)  have  limited  total  fluctuation  in  the  range  (a,  b).     Then,  as 
X  —  X  ,  [  V  (^)  sin  {\d)  dd  is  0  (IjX). 

J  a 

For,  by  |  3"64  example  2,  we  may  write 

where  (f>i{0),  <j>2{6)  are  positive  increasing  bounded  functions  in  the  range 
(a,  h). 

Then,  by  the  second  mean-value  theorem  (§  4-14),  we  can  find  |  such  that 
a ^^ ^b  and 


</>!  (0)  sin  (\e)  dO 


=   <f,,(b)      sm{\d)dd 


^2x-^<p,(by 


Therefore  [  (Pr(0)sm(\d)dd, 

J  a 

rb 
and  snnilarly  ,^2  (61)  sin  {\d)  dd 

J  a 

is  0(1/X),  and  the  lemma  is  then  evident. 

Corollary.     In  the  same  circumstances   I     ^  (d)  cos  (X^)  dd  is  0  (1/X). 


Ges.  Math.  Werlce,  p.  241. 


9  21-9-23]  FOURIER  SERIES  107 

922.     Lebesgue's  lemma*. 
Let   I    \'^ {6)\dd  exist  and  let  ^ (6)  be  such  that  when  a  finite  number  of 

arbitrarily  small  intervals  8j,  8^,  ...  8^  are  omitted  from  the  range  (a,  b),  ^{0) 

has  limited  total  fiuctuation  in  each  of  the  r  +  1  surviving  portions  of  the  range. 

rb 
Then,  as\-^x>,       ^  ((9)  sin  (\^)  dS  is  o  (1). 

J  a 

A  function  possessing  the  proi)erties  attributed  to  ^  (6)  will  be  said  to  satisfy  Dirichle^s 
conditions  in  the  range  (a,  h).  This  phraseology  is  convenient,  although  Dirichlet  really 
contemplated  only  such  functions  as  were  continuous  except  at  a  finite  number  of  ordinary 
discontinuities  and  had  only  a  finite  number  of  maxima  and  minima  t. 

Let  6  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number;  take  8^,  8^,  ...  8n  so  small  that 


"^{ey^ddKe 


(w=l,  2,  ...r). 


If  r„  be  any  one  of  the  r  +  1  surviving  portions  of  the  range,  by  Riemann's 
lemma  we  can  find  a  number|  N,  independent  of  X  but  depending  on  e,  such 
that 


L 


M>  {d)  sin  {\d)  dd 


<  NX-\ 


(n  =  l,2,...r  +  l). 


)^ 


Hence 

[    ^  (6')  sin  (\^)  c^^   =   T  f  ^(0)sm{\d)dd+  2  f  ^(e)dd 

•la  n=lJ  r„  n=lJ  Sn  ^ 

<  (r+  l)NX-^  +  r€. 
Therefore,  when  X,  >  N'€~\ 

'^(e)sm(X0)dd  <(2r  +  l)e, 

rb 


lim   [  ^'(d)sm{\e)d0=O; 


and  so 

this  is  the  result  stated. 

9-23.     Dirichlet's  statement  of  Fourier's  theorem. 

Let  f(t)  be  a  function  which  satisfies  Dirichlet's  conditions  (§  9*22)  in  the 
range  (—  ir,  ir).  Let  f{t)  be  defined  outside  the  range  (—  tt,  tt)  by  the  equation 
fit  +  27r)  =f(t).  Let  X  be  an  interior  point  of  an  interval  {a,  b)  in  which  f(t) 
has  limited  total  fiuctuation. 


Then  if         Tra^— j      f(t) cos  ntdt,     7rbn=  I      f{t)sinntdt, 

J  -n  J  —n 

00 

the  series  ^ao+  S  ((X„  cos  nx  +  6„sin  nx)  is  convergent  and  has  the  sum^    . 

^[f(^+0)+f{x-0)}. 

*  Series  Trigonovietriques,  Cliapter  iii. 

t  These  functions  are  such  as  occur  in  applications  of  Fourier  series  in  various  branches  of 
Applied  Mathematics. 

X  N  may  be  taken  to  be  four  times  the  fluctuation  of  ^  {6)  in  all  the  ranges  ri,  r^,  ...  »V+i- 
§  The  limits /(x±0)  exist  by  §  3-64  example  3. 


168  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

First,  suppose  that  the  interval  {a,  h)  may  be  taken  to  be  the  interval 
(— TT  +  a;,  TT+ic).  Then,  by  Riemann's  lemma  (§  9'21),  a^  cos  twc  +  6„  sin  wa; 
is  0  (l/n)  as  w  -^  00  ;  and,  by  Fejer's  theorem  (§  9'2),  the  series 

^tto  +  S  (an  cos  7ix  +  bn  sin  nx) 

is  summable  (Gl)  and  its  sum  (C 1)  is  ^  {f(x  +  0)  +f(cc  —  0)}.     Therefore,  by 

00 

Hardy's  convergence  theorem  (§  8*5),  ^ao  +  S  (a,i  cos  ??«  +  6,i  sin  Aia;)  is  con- 

n  =  l 

vergent  awe?  its  sum  is  ^  {f(x  +  0)  +f(x  —  0)}. 

Secondly,  suppose  that  it  is  not  legitimate  to  take  the  interval  (a,  b)  to 
be  the  interval  (—  ir  +  x,  tt  +  x),  so  that  —  ir  +  x  <  a  <  x  <b  <  ir  -\-  x. 

Let  iran  =\  f{t)  cos  ntdt,      Trbn  =  I  f{t)smntdt. 

Then,  by  Riemann's  lemma  (§  9"21)  and  Fejer's  theorem  (§  9"2), 

^  do'  +  X  (un  COS  nx  +  6,i'  sin  ??a;) 

n  =  l 

is  convergent  and  has  the  sum 

hm  J, -^—^  f  (x  +  2d)  dd  + —  ^-^-^f(x-2d)dd[, 

and  this  limit  is  ^  {/(a;  4-  0)  +f{x  -  0)|,  by  Fejer's  theorem. 
Now  consider 

TO 

I  (tto  -  tto')  +  S  [{an  —  ttn)  COS  ??ir  +  (bn  -  bn  )  siu  nx] 

=  -]|  +1        i  .{^  + COS  (x-t)  + COS  2  {x-t)+ ...+ COS m(x-t)]f  (t)dt 

^  1    f.       sini(2,.+  l)(..-0         ,^  ^   1    p-  -i(2!» +l)i£::_ 0  ^(,) ,, 

27rJ_„+^  sm^{x-t)         -^  ^  ^  2ir]b  sm^(a-'-^)         ^^' 

1  /-i-      sin  (27/1 +  1)6>  1  ri-       sin  (2m  +1)6',,       ^  „,    „ 

=  -  ^-^ — —/(x-26)dd+-  — ^-^—a — ~'f{x  +  2d)d6. 

In  the  first  integral  |  cosec  6  \  ^  cosec  ^  (x  -  a),  and  so  f(x  —  2^)  cosec  0 
satisfies  Dirichlet's  conditions  in  the  range  (^x  -  ^a,  ^tt);  consequently,  by 
Lebesgue's  lemma  (§  9'22), 

,.       r^'^        sin(2m  +  l)<9  ^,        ^^,   ,^     ^ 
lim  -J         f{x-2e)dd  =  0. 

Similarly         limf*'       "'"  <^'"  + '^  V(.+ 2^)  rfff  =  0. 
Therefore  the  series 

00 

i  («o  -  «o')  +  S  {(a„  -  a,/) cos  «^  +  (bn  —  bn) sin 7?a;} 

n  =  l 

converges  and  its  sum  is  zero 


9*24]  FOURIER  SERIES  169 

Since  ^Qo  +  t  {an  coanx  +  bn  sin  nx] -j^{f(x  +  0)-\-f(x -0)}, 

n=l 

we  get  by  addition 

00 

^  tto  +  S  {dn  COS  nx  +  bn  sin  nx]  =  ^  {f(x  +  0)  +f{x  -  0)} ; 

M  =  l 

and  this^s  the  required  result. 

Corollary.     Since  ^ao+  2  ancosnx  is  the  Fourier  series  associated  with  the  function 

n=l 

00  00 

i  {/(•^■)  +/( ~  *')}>  ^^6  series  ^ao+  2  ««  cos  nx  converges,  and  so  does  the  series  2  6»  sin  no; 

n=l  n=l 

provided  that  x  and  -  ,r  are  interior  points  of  intervals  in  which  the  conditions  concerning 
limited  total  fluctuation  are  satisfied. 

•  Example  1.     Deduce  from  Fejer's  theorem  that,  if  f{t)  satisfies  Dirichlet's  conditions 
and  X  is  an  interior  point  of  an  interval  in  which /(^)  has  limited  total  fluctuation, 


lim 


where  0  <  a  <  \ir. 
'  Example  2.     If  <^  (6)  satisfies  suitable  conditions  in  the  range  (0,  n),  shew  that 

lim     /•-^in(2m  +  l)^  ^^^   ^.^    p^sin(2^+l)^  ^^ 

m^'^.Jo  Sine         ^^'  m  — oojo  sm^ 

,.        /"J"-sin(2»i  +  l)  ^  ,  ,        .,   ,. 
+    hm  —    ■     '    '     (b(7r-6)dB 

=i7r{(/)(+0)  +  (^(7r-0)}. 

•    Example  .3.     Prove  that,  if  a>0, 

,.        /"*  sin  (2/1  +  1)^       zi  7/,     1         ^11 


[Shew  that 
'  sin  (2)1  +  1)^ 


aTT. 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 


sin  d 


e-a9 


/"""'sin(2?i  +  l)<9 
dB=    hm    /        •   T        e-aOdd 

lim    /""  «yLL2'i+l)i  (e-ae  +  e-a(e+7r)+...  +  e-a(fl+m,r)i, 
,^^  J  0         sm<9 


't  sin(2n  +  l)(9    e-a^d6 
sin  ^  1  -  e  -  ftT  ' 

and  use  example  2.] 

Example  4.  Deduce  from  Lebesgue's  lemma  that,  if  a„  and  &„  are  Fourier  constants, 
<^»,  &H-^"0  as  »-»oo. 

9"24.      Uniformity  of  convergence  of  Fourier  series. 

Let  /X^)  satisfy  Dirichlet's  conditions  in  the  range  (-tt,  tt)  ;  and  let  a4-S^^'$6-5 
where  S  >  0  and  f{t)  is  continuous  and  has  limited  total  fluctuation  in  the  range  (a,  b). 
Then  the  Fourier  series  associated  with  the  function  f  {x)  converges  uniformly  to  the  siC7nf{x) 
when  a  +  B  <x<b—8. 


170  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

fb-S  fb-S 

For  if  7ra„'=  I        f{t)  cos  ntdt,     irbn'=  j        f  {t)  sin  ntdt, 

J a+S  J a+S 

by  §  9-2  corollary,  it  follows  that  |ao'+   2  (a„'cos  na;+bn' sin  nx)  is  uniformly  summable  ; 

n=l 

and  since 

I  a„'  cos  nx-\-hn  sin  nx  \  <  (an'^  +  6n'^)*, 

which  is  independent  of  ^  and  is  0  {Ijn)  by  §  9"21,  it  follows  from  i^  8-5  corollary  that 

\aQ  +  2  {an  cos  nx  +  W  sin  n^) 

converges  uniformly  to  the  sum  /  {x). 
Now,  by  §  9-23, 

\  («„  -  cto')  +   2  {{an  -  an)  COS  nx-\-{bn  —  bn)  sin  nx) 


n=\ 


1    /"i'r        sin(2OT  +  l)^ 


T  j  i(a;-a)         sin  6 


f{x-2e)d6+'-  f^"      ^^(^^'^^4A)V(,,  +  2^)^^; 

■^  ^  T^  J  i{b-x)         smi9 


and,  as  in  §  9*22,  given  e,  we  can  take  the  intervals  yi,  y^,  ...  y,.  (in  which  /(<)  is  not 
bounded)  so  small  that 


/      \f{t)\dt<e  sin  8         {n=l,2,...r) 
J  y . 


and  then  if  i^  be  the  range  {^x  —  ^a,  ^tt)  with  the  intervals  -yi,  y^,  ...y,-  omitted,  we  have 
sin  (2??i  +  l)^ 


/., 


sin  d 


^f{x-2e)de    <#(2m  +  l)-i. 


where  iVis  four  times  the  fluctuation  of /(«-2^)  cosec^  in  the  range  i,. ;  and  it  follows 
from  §  3-64  example  4  that     • 

vV^iVoCosec  8, 

where  N^^  depends  only  on  the  values  of  f{t)  in  the  range  (  — tt,  n)  with  the  intervals 
yi>  ■y2)---yr  omitted. 

rru       e  I    /"*"■         sin(2??i  +  l)^    .,        ^.,    ,.  i  {r-\-\)  N^ 

Therefore  /  ■    Z         /(-^  -  2(9)  rf^    <  ,-r-^^^v- •     ^  + '"f 

<(2r+l)e 

when  2??i  +  l>  A^o  cosec  S  ;  since  this  choice  of  m  is  independent  of  x,  the  integral  tends  to 

zero  uniformly.     Applying  the  same  arguments  to    I  '  —^^ a'       f{x  +  26)dd,  we 

J  Hb-x)         smp 

see  that  ^{a,y  —  ao')+  2  {{a^  —  a^')  cos 7ix  +  {bn-  b„')  sin  nx]  converges  uniformly  to  the  sum 

n=l 

zero. 

Since  the  sum  of  two  uniformly  convergent  series  converges  uniformly,  we  see  that 
^00+  2  (a„cos?i^+6„sin?i.r)  converges  imiformly  to  the  sum/(^)  when  a  +  8^x^b  —  8. 

n=l 

Note.  It  must  be  observed  that  no  general  statement  can  be  made  about  uniformity 
or  absoluteness  of  convergence  of  Fourier  series.  Thus  the  series  of  §  9'11  example  1 
converges  imiformly  except  near  x={2n  +  l)ir  but  converges  absolutely  only  when  x^nn, 
whereas  the  series  of  5^  9'11  example  2  converges  uniformly  and  absolutely  for  all  real 
values  of  x. 


9-3,  9-31]  FOURIER  SERIES  171 

9"3.     The  representation  of  a  function  by  Fourier  series  for  ranges  other 
than  (— TT,  tt). 

Consider  a  function  f(a;)  satisfying  Dirichlet's  conditions  in  the  range 

Write  a;  =  l(a  +  b)-l(a-b)'rr-'iv',    f{x)  =  F{x'). 

Then  we  have  proved  that 

1  1  " 

g  [F {x'  +  0)  +  jP {x  -  0)}  =  g  tto  +  S  {an cos  nx'  +  &„  sin nx), 

^  ^  n=l 

and  so 

|{/(^  +  0)+/(^-0)l 

1  5    f  nTT  (2a;  —  a  —  6)      ,     .    nir  (2x  —  a  —  b)) 

=  ^ao+  S   -^ancos 7 +  6„sin — ^ '-y , 

^         n=i  [  0  —a  o  —  a) 

where  by  an  obvious  transformation 

^{b  —  a)  an=  j   J  {x)  cos  —    , ax, 

2  (6  —  a)  bn  =\   f{x)  sin ^-r dx. 

J  a  0       a 

9*31.     The  cosine  series  and  the  sine  series. 

Let  f(x)  be  defined  in  the  range  (0,  I)  and  satisfy  Dirichlet's  conditions 
in  that  range.     Define  f{x)  in  the  range  (0,  —  I)  by  the  equation 

f{-a:)=f{x). 
Then 

-  {/(a;  +  0)+/(^'-0)}  =  2^0+  X   ia„cos*-y'^  +  6.rtSin*^   , 
where,  by  §  9"3, 

lan=  \     f  (t)  cos —J- dt  =  2  j  f(t)  cos  ^-^cL»; 

lK=f  f{t)sm^dt^O, 

so  that  when  —  I  ^x^l, 

9  l/(^  +  0)  +/(^  -  0)}  =  ^  <Xo  +  t  an  cos  —r- ; 
this  is  called  the  cosine  series. 

If,  however,  we  define /(a?)  in  the  range  (0,  —  I)  by  the  equation 


172  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

we  get,  when  —I ^004,1, 

I  {/(^  +  0)  +Ax  -  0)}  =  i  6„  sin  ^ , 

where  lbn  =  2  j  f(t)  sin  -^  dt ; 

this  is  called  the  sine  series. 

Thus  the  series 

1  S  nTTX         2,    ,      .    rnrx 

g  tto  +  S  a„  cos  -J- ,       Z   On  sm  —j- , 

^  n=l  I'  w  =  l  '' 

where  ^lan=  \  f  (t) cos —j- dt,        ^lbn=  j  f  (t)  sin— j-dt, 

have  the  same  sum  when  0 ^x^l;  but  their  sums  are  numerically  equal  and 
opposite  in  sign  when  O^w^  —  l. 

*    Example  1.     Expand  ^(tt  — ^■)sin^  in  a  cosine  series  in  the  range  O^x^tt. 

[We  have,  by  the  formula  just  obtained, 

^{7r—x)sm.v=^aQ+  2  a^cosw.^, 
w=l 

where  iiran=  i    ^  (tt  —  ^)  sin  ^ cos nx dx. 

Jo 

But,  integrating  by  parts,  if  w  4=1, 

I    2{Tr  —  x)  sin  x  cos  nxdx 
J  0 

=  I    {tt  —  x)  {Hin  (n  + 1)  X  -  sin  {71  —  I)  x}  dx 
Jo 

_r.    _    ,  Jcos(%  +  l)^      cos {n  —  I) xYl"^       f~  jcos(n  +  l)x      cos{n  —  l)x'\    ,  ^ 
~L  1      w  +  1  »^^^      J  Jo  "jot      »i+l  ^^^i      J 

/^^ 1_\    _  -277 

~ ""  V^r     n-\)~  (/i  + 1 )  (7^  -  1 )  * 
Whereas  if  w=l,  we  get  I    2  (tt  — .r)sin.'«7C0SA-(i^=  J-tt. 

JO 

Therefore  the  required  series  is 

7;  +  -  cos:>7  — - — T  cos  2,^■  — - — -cos  3^  — — -~  cos 4^— 

24  1.3  2.4  3.5 

It  will  be  observed  that  it  is  only  for  values  of  x  between  0  and  tt  that  the  sum  of  this 
series  is  proved  to  be  A  (tt  —  x)  sin  x  ;  thus  for  instance  when  x  has  a  value  between  0  and 
—  TT,  the  sum  of  the  series  is  not  ^(7r-^)sin^,  but  —\ijf\- x)  sva. x  ;  when  x  has  a  value 
between  tt  and  27r,  the  sum  of  the  series  happens  to  be  again  ^  (tt  —  a*)  sin  a-,  but  this  is  a 
mere  coincidence  arising  from  the  special  function  considered,  and  does  not  follow  from 
the  general  theorem.] 


Example  2.     Expand  'J.-r  (tt  —  j.')  in  a  sine  series,  valid  when  0  ^.r^i 

in  3 
"33" 


rrr.!            •       •       ■           sin  3.:^      sin  bx  ^ 

[The  series  is  sin  x  H — -^^ 1 — h  . . . .] 


9-4] 


FOURIER  SERIES 


173 


Example  3.     Shew  that,  when  0  ^  :p  ^  tt, 

1        /  ^    V  ,    ..      ^  ^    o\  COS  3^       C08  5;» 

—  TT  ( IT  -2x){7r^ +  27rx-2x^)  =  COS  x  +  —:ij-  +  — ^i- + 

yb 


3* 


5* 


[Denoting  the  left-hand  side  hy  f{x),  we  have,  on  integrating  by  parts  and  observing 

that/(0)=/(7r)  =  0, 

/  f{x)coanxdx=-\f{x)ii'mnx\ I   f  (x)ainnxdx 

=  — ,    f  (x)  cos  nx  \ 5       f"  (x)  cos  nxdx 

n^H  ^  '  Jo      w-'./o-^ 

= -A  f"  (x)  sin  no;      +  ^  I   /'"  {x)  sin  nxdx 

«^L  Jo      ^-Vo 


=  4[r 


(a7)cosn^      = -|(1 -cosMjr).] 


'    Example  4.     Shew  that  for  values  of  x  between  0  and  tt,  e**  can  be  expanded  in  the 
cosine  series 

2s,  ,x/l       cos2a'     cos  4^        \      2s,  ,./cos^     cos  3a; 

and  draw  graphs  of  the  function  ^^  and  of  the  sum  of  the  series. 

.   Example  5.     Shew  that  for  values  of  x  between  0  and  tt,  the  function  Jn-  {■n  —  'ix)  can 
be  expanded  in  the  cosine  series 


cos  X  +  - 


cos  3^     cos  hx 
+ 


+  ..., 


32      '      5^ 
and  draw  graphs  of  the  function  \tt  (tt  —  ^x)  and  of  the  sum  of  the  series. 

9'4.     The  nature  of  the  coejficients  in  a  Fouriei-  series. 

Suppose  that  (as  in  the  numerical  examples  which  have  been  discussed) 
the  interval  (—  tt,  tt)  can  be  divided  into  a  finite  number  of  ranges 
(—  TT,  k^),  {k^,  k.2) ...  {kn,  tt)  such  that  throughout  each  range  f{x)  and  all  its 
differential  coefficients  are  continuous  and  have  limited  total  fluctuation  and 
have  limits  on  the  right  and  on  the  left  (§  3'2)  at  the  end  points  of  these 
ranges. 

Then 


Tram  =  I      /  (0  ^os  mtdt  +  I     f  (t)  cos  7ntdt  + 


+  I    f{t)  COS  mtdt. 


Integrating  by  parts  we  get 


7n~^  f  (t)  sin  mt 


+ 


m~^  f  (t)  sin  mt 


+  ...+ 


A-, 


m  ^  f  (t)  sin  mt 


SO  that 
where 


k,  ft, 

f'{t)  sin  mtdt  —  m~^  I    /'  {t)  sin  mtdt  — 

-TT  ''    A, 

m  ' 


—  m 


/'  (t)  sin  mtdt, 


/>■„ 


a  in  — 


A., 


m 


TrArn  =  S   sin  mkr  [f{k,  -  0)  -/(^•,  +  0)|, 


and  hm  is  a  Fourier  constant  of  /'  {x). 


174  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 


bimilarly  Om  = r 


m       m 
where 


TrBm  =  -  i  cos  mkr  [f{kr  -  0)  -f{kr  +  0)}  -  /cos  m  {/(tt  -  0)  -/(-  TT  +  0)}, 


r=\ 


and  a^'  is  a  Fourier  constant  of  /'  {x). 
Similarly,  we  get 

A      '         h     "  Ti    '  n     " 

ttm   —  >  ^wi   ^  + J 

mm  mm 

where  a^',  bm"  are  the  Fourier  constants  of  /"  (x)  and 

n 

'rrAj=      S   sinmA;^{/'(^,.-0)-/(A;,  +  0)}, 

?•  =  ! 

n 

TrBm'  =  -  S  COS  mkr  {/'  (kr  -  0)  -  /'  (A;,  +  0)} 

r=l 

-  COS  m-rr  [f  (tt  -  0)  -  /'  (-  tt  4-  0)j. 
Therefore 


m        nv        irr  m        m-       iir 


Now  as  m  -*»  00  ,  we  see  that 

AJ  =  0{\),    Bm'=0(l), 
and,  by  §  9*21,  it  is  evident  that 

am"  =  0(1),       Kr  =  o(l). 

Hence  if  Am=  0,  Bm  =  0,  the  Fourier  series  forf(x)  converges  absolutely 
and  uniformly,  by  §  3'34. 

The  necessary  and  sufficient  conditions  that  ^,^  =  ^^  =  0  for  all  values  of 
m  are  that 

f{kr-0)  =f{K  +  0),      /(tT-O)  =/(-  TT  +  0), 

that  is  to  say  that */(;»)  should  be  continuous  for  all  values  of  x. 

9*41.     Differentiation  of  Fourier  series. 

The  result  of  differentiating 

1  "" 

^  ao  +  %  (ttm  COS  mx  +  6,„,  sin  mx) 

^  m  =  l 

00 

term  by  term  is  2   {nibm  cos  mx  —  ma„i  sin  mx]. 

m  =  l 

With  the  notation  of  |  9*4,  this  is  the  same  as 

-  tto'  +   2   (a  J  cos  mx  +  6„,'  sin  mx), 

provided  that  J.,„  =  B^^  =  0   and   I      /'  {x)  dx  —  Q; 

J    — IT 

these  conditions  are  satisfied  ii  f(x)  is  continuous  for  all  values  of  x. 

*  Of  course /(a;)  is  also  subject  to  the  conditions  stated  at  the  beginning  of  the  section. 


9-41-9-5]  FOURIER   SERIES  176 

Consequently  sufficient  conditions  for  the  legitimacy  of  differentiating 
a  Fourier  series  term  by  term  are  that  f{x)  should  be  continuous  for  all 
values  of  x  and  /'  {x)  should  have  only  a  finite  number  of  points  of  discon- 
tinuity in  the  range  (—  tt,  tt),  both  functions  having  limited  total  fluctuation 
throughout  the  range. 

9'42.     Determination  of  points  of  discontinuity. 

The  expressions  for  a^  and  h^  which  have  been  found  in  §  9"4  can  frequently  be  applied 
in  practical  examples  to  determine  the  points  at  which  the  sum  of  a  given  Fourier  series 
may  be  discontinuous.  Thus,  let  it  be  required  to  determine  the  places  at  which  the  sum 
of  the  series 

sin  2  + J  sin  3z-|-^  sin  50+... 
is  discontinuous. 

Assuming  that  the  series  is  a  Fourier  series  and  not  any  trigonometrical  series  and 
observing  that  a,„  =  0,  6^=(2m)~*(l  —  cosmTr),  we  get  on  considering  the  formiila  found  in 
§  9-4, 

Hence  if  ^i,  /(".i,  ...  are  the  places  at  which  the  analytic  character  of  the  sum  is  broken, 
we  Ijave 

0  =  7rJ^=[sinm^i{/(^i-0)-/(^i+0)}  +  sinm^2{/(^2-0)-/(^2+0)}  +  ...]. 

Since  this  is  true  for  all  values  of  m,  the  numbers  ^i,  ^2>  •••  must  be  multiples  of  tt  ;  but 
there  is  only  one  even  multiple  of  tt  in  the  range  —  7r<a;^7r,  namely  zero.  So  ^i=0, 
and  ^2»  ^3)  •••  do  not  exist.     Substituting  ^i  =  0  in  the  equation  B^^^^-^cosmn-,  we  have 

7r(^-JcosTO7r)=-[cosm7r{/(7r-0)-/(-7r  +  0)}+/(-0)-/(  +  0)]. 

Since  this  is  true  for  all  values  of  m,  we  have 

A7r=/(  +  0)-/(-0),     W=/(7r-0)-/(7r+0). 

This  shews  that,  if  the  series  is  a  Fourier  series,  f{x)  has  discontinuities  at  the  points 
nir  (n  any  integer),  and  since  a^  —  b^  =  0,  we  should  expect* /(a;)  to  be  constant  in  the 
open  range  (  — tt,  0)  and  to  be  another  constant  in  the  open  range  (0,  tt). 

9"5.     The  Hurwitz-Liapounoff '\  theorem  concerning  Fourier  constants. 

Let  f{x)  he   hounded  and  satisfy  Dirichlet's  conditions  (§  9"22),  so  that 

1  "" 

its  Fourier  constants  an,  hn  exist.     Then  s  ao"  +   2  (a^^  +  hn)  converges  to  the 


sum 


x\r  [fixyf-dx. 

^  J    -IT 


For,  Sn  (x)  being  defined  as  in  §  9*2,  if  x  is  not  a  point  of  any  one  of 
r  intervals  each  of  arbitrarily  small   length  S,  given  e  we  can  choose  mi 
depending  on  B  and  e  but  independent  of  x,  so  that,  when  m  >  m^, 


(  1  '"-I  ) 

(  m  „=o  ' 


<  e; 


*  In  point  of  fact  f{x)=-^ir         (-7r<x<0); 

/(x)  =  i7r  (0<x<ir). 

+  Math.  Annalen,  lvii.  (1903),  p.  426.     Liapounoff  discovered  the  theorem  in  1896. 
X  This  integral  converges,  by  §  412  example  1. 


176  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

and  if  ;»  be  a  point  of  one  of  these  intervals,  it  follows  from  the  integral 

TO  — 1 

obtained  for  2  /S„(a;)  in  §  9*2  that  if  k  be  the  upper  bound  of  \f{x)  \,  then 
«=o 
-1 
2  ^„  {x)  I  <  mK,  and  so 


M  =  0 


1    m-l 

^  2  .Sf„(^)-/(^) 


<2/e. 


Therefore,  when  m>m-^,  we  have 

I    m-\  )2 

fix)--  t  8n(x)[  dx  <  (27r  -  r8)  e^  +  4>K'r8. 
Since  this  is  true  for  all  values*  of  8  and  e  no  matter  how  small,  it  follows 


that 


rir       f  \    m-l  ]2 

lim  /(^)--  S  ^n{x)i  dx  =  0. 


But 


f        /(^)--^  S  >S«(^)    dx^\      \f{x)-    t  ^~-A^(x)\  dx 

=         {/(«;)p  dx-2        fix)  t  "^  A,,  (x)  dx 

j  An(x)y  dx. 


But  since 


m  —  n\ 


13a;        qxdx  =  0,  when  « =1=  o,  and  since 

.  cos  cos  ^  112 


/(ii:)  cos  wa;c?a;  =  7ra„,       I     /(*')  sin  ?iA"c?a;  =  irbn, 


we  have 


1  '""^  )- 

/'(ic) 2    Sn(x)>    dx 

r  TT  171— L  f^Y^ ,^  1 

J     -TT  W-1  ''^^  •^ 

»J  -  1 


+   2 {cin^  +  h,;^) 

m-l 


f{x)Y~dx-^7ra^-'n   t  K^  +  6n^)  +  —   2  w^  (««' +  V) 


1 


w— 1 

2 

n  =  l 


>H  -  1 


f{x)  -  -  cIq  -  %  An  {x)\  dx  +  -—  2  n"  (a„"  +  hn% 


IT 

Consequently,  since    the   left-hand  side  tends  to  zero  and  both   of  the 
expressions  in  the  last  line  are  positive, 

TT  '""^ 
rii   ,j  =  1 

*  To  make  the  right-hand  side  of  this  inequality  into  a  function  of  one  variable  e,  we  may 
take  5  =  6. 


9*6,  9-61]  FOURIER   SERIES  '  177 

and  therefore,  considering  the  last  but  one  of  the  above  set  of  equal 
expressions, 

J^    {f{x)Y  dx  -  TT 1^  a„2  +  V  {an'  +  6„^)|  -  0. 

This  is  the  theorem  stated. 

Corollary.  ParsevaVs  theorem,  li  f{x),  F{x)  both  satisfy  the  conditions  laid  on  /(.r) 
at  the  beginning  of  this  section,  and  if  J„,  5„  be  the  Fourier  constants  of  F{x\  it  follows 
by  subtracting  the  pair  of  equations  which  may  be  combined  in  the  one  form 

J"  ^  {fix)  ±  F  {x)Y  dx  =  7rh  (ao  ±  ^o)2 + J  «««  ±Anf  +  {K  ±  i?0"^}] 
that  /      f{x)F{x)dx=nhaoA^i+-2{anAn  +  bnBn)\- 

9"6.     Riemanns  theory  of  trigonometrical  series. 

The  theory  of  Dirichlet  concerning  Fourier  series  is  devoted  to  series 
which  represent  given  functions.  Important  advances  in  the  theory  were 
made  by  Riemann,  who  considered  properties  of  functions  defined  by  a  series 

1  * 

of  the  type  *  ^  «o  +  X  (an  cos  nx  +  bn  sin  nx),  where  it  is  for  the  most  part 

assumed  that  lim  (a„  cos  )ix  +  bn  sin  nx)  =  0.     We  shall  give,  as  an  illustration 

of  Riemann 's  theory,  the  propositions  leading  up  to  the  theorem f  that  if  two 
trigonometrical  series  converge  and  are  equal  at  all  points  of  the  range 
(—  TT,  tt)  with  the  possible  exception  of  a  finite  number  of  points,  corre- 
sponding coefficients  in  the  two  series  are  equal. 

9'61.     Riemanns  associated  function. 

2  GO  00 

Let  the  sum  of  the  series  -ao-l-  S  (a,iCos  wa?-f- ^nsinwa;)  =  ^o  +  2  An{x) 
at  any  point  x  where  it  converges  be  denoted  hy  f{x). 

Let  F{x)=\a^''-   S  n-'-An{x). 

Then,  if  the  series  defining  f{x)  converges  at  all  points  of  any  finite  interval, 
the  series  defining  F{x)  converges  for  all  values  of  x. 

To  obtain  this  result  we  need  the  following  Lemma  due  to  Cantor : 
Cantoris  lemma\.     If  lim  An  (^)  =  0  for  all  values  of  x  such  that  a  ^x  ^b,  then  an  -»•  0, 

bn^O. 

For  take  two  points  x,  x  +  8  of  the  interval.  Then,  given  f,  we  can  find  Hq  such  that§, 
when  n>nQ 

I  an  cos  nx  +  bn  sin  nx  |  <  e,     |  a„  cos  n  {x  +  8)  +  bn  sin  n  (x  +  8)\<€. 

Therefore 

I  cos  w8  (a,(  cos  nx  +  bn  sin  nx)  +  sin  9i8  ( —  a„  sin  «^  +  b„  cos  nx)  \  <  e . 

*  Throughout  §§  9 '6-9 '632  the  letters  a,„,  b^  do  not  necessarily  denote  Fourier  constants, 
t  The  proof  given  is  due  to  G.  Cantor,  Journal  fiir  Math,  lxxii. 

X  Riemann  appears  to   have  regarded  this  result  as  obvious.     The  proof  here  given  is  a 
modification  of  Cantor's  proof  (Math.  Annalen,  iv.). 
§  The  value  of  ?io  depends  on  x  and  ou  5. 

W.    M.    A.  12 


178  THE    PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

Since  |  cos  n8  {an  cos  nx  +  hn  sin  nx)  \  <  f , 

it  follows  that  |  sin  nh  ( -  a«  sin  nx + 6„  cos  nx)  \  < 2f , 

and  it  is  obvious  that  |  sin  n8  {ctn  cos  nx  +  bn  sin  7ix)  |  <  2e. 

Therefore,  squaring  and  adding 

(a„2^-6„2)4|sin%S|<2fV2. 

Now  suppose  that  a„,  6„  have  not  the  unique  limit  0;  it  will  be  shewn  that  this 
hypothesis  involves  a  contradiction.  For,  by  this  hypothesis,  some  positive  number  to 
exists  such  that  there  is  an  unending  increasing  sequence  tij,  n2,...  of  values  of  n,  for 
which 

Now  let  the  range  of  values  of  S  be  called  the  interval  /j  of  length  Zj  on  the  real  axis. 

Take  w/  the  smallest  of  the  integers  n^  such  that  Wi'Zi>27r ;  then  sin?^l'y  goes  through 
all  its  phases  in  the  interval  /^ ;  call  /g  that  sub-interval*  of  /j  in  which  sin %i'y>  1/^/2  ; 
its  length  is  irj{2ni)  =  L2.  Next  take  n^  the  smallest  of  the  integers  nj.{>ni)  such  that 
n2'Ii2>27r,  so  that  sin%'y  goes  through  all  its  phases  in  the  interval  I2 ;  call  Is  that  sub- 
interval*  of  I2  in  which  sin%2'y>l/v/2  ;  its  length  is  7r/(2n2')  =  L^.  We  thus  get  a 
sequence  of  decreasing  intervals  Ii,  I2, ...  each  contained  in  all  the  previous  ones.  It  is 
obvious  from  the  definition  of  an  irrational  number  that  there  is  a  certain  point  a  which 
is  not  outside  any  of  these  intervals,  and  sinna^l/v/2  when  n  =  ni,  «2'j  •••  (^V+i  >»*/)• 
For  these  values  of  n,  (aj  +  b„^)^  sin  na>2fQ  ^2.  But  it  has  been  shewn  that  corresponding 
to  given  numbers  a  and  e  we  can  find  «o  such  that  when  n>no,  {an^  +  bn^)h(smna)<2f  ^2  ; 
since  some  values  of  n,.'  are  greater  than  ??.(,,  the  required  contradiction  has  been  obtained, 
because  we  may  take  f  <eo ;  therefore  a„  -^  0,  bn  ->-  0. 

Assuming  that  the  series  defining /(a?)  converges  at  all  points  of  a  certain 
interval  of  the  real  axis,  we  have  just  seen  that  a^^-O,  6„-^0.     Then,  for  all 

real  values  of  x,  \  an  cos  nx  +  b^  sin  nx  j  ^  (a„-  +  bn^)--^0,  and  so,  by  §  3'34,  the 

CO 

series  ^A^x'^  —  ^  n~^  An{x)  =  F(x),  converges  absolutely  and  uniformly  for  all 

M  =  l 

real  values  oi  x;  therefore,  (§  3"32),  F(x)  is  continuous  for  all  real  values  of  x. 

9'62.     Properties  of  Riemanns  associated  function ;  Riemann's  first  lemma. 
It  is  now^  possible  to  prove  Riemann's  first  lemma  that  if 
F  (x  +  2a)  +  F(x-2a)-  2F(x) 


G  {x,  a)  = 


4a2 


then  lim  G{x,  a)  =f(x),  provided  that    %  An{x)  converges  for  the  value  of  x 
under  consideration. 

Since  the   series  defining  F{x),  F{x  ±  2a)  converge  absolutely,   we  may 
rearrange  them  ;  and,  observing  that 

cos  n  {x  -f  2a)  +  cos  n  {x  —  2a)  —  2  cos  nx  =  —  4  sin-  no.  cos  nx, 

sin  n  (x  +  2a)  +  sin  n  {x  —  2a)  —  2  sin  nx  =  —  4<  sin^  wa  sin  nx, 

it  is  evident  that 

n  /       \       A         Z  /sin  naV    .    ,  , 
G(x,a)  =  A,+  2  -—     An(x). 

n  =  i  V    na    J 

*  If  tbere  is  more  than  one  such  sub-interval,  take  that  which  lies  on  the  left. 


962]  FOURIER  SERIES  179 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  this  series  converges  uniformly  with  regard  to 

00 

a  for  all  values  of  a,  provided  that   2  ^»(a?)  converges.     The  result  required 

n  =  l 

/sin  7icc\^ 
is  then  an  immediate  consequence  of  §  3'32  :  for,  if/„(o)=  f J  ,  (a^O), 

and/„(0)  =  1,  then/„(a)  is  continuous  for  all  values  of  a,  and  so  G(x,  a)  is  a 
continuous  function  of  a,  and  therefore,  by  §  3'2,  G(a;,  0)  =  lim  G(x,  a). 

To  prove  that  the  series  defining  G  (x,  a)  converges  uniformly,  we  employ 
the  test  given  in  §  3'35  example  2.  The  expression  corresponding  to  (On{x) 
is  /n(a),  and  it  is  obvious  that  !/„(«)  j^^l;  it  is  therefore  sufficient  to  shew 

00 

that  1  |/n+i(«)— /n(a)  i  <  K,  where  K  is  independent  of  a. 

n  =  l 

In  fact*  if  s  be  the  integer  such  that  s|a|^7r<(s  +  l)la|,  when  a=t=0  we  have 

s — 1                                    s — 1                                    sin^  fl      sin  5fl 
2    I  /»  + 1  («)  -/n  (a)  I  =    2   ( /„  (a)  -/„  + 1  (a))  =  —7^ —ili-  • 


Also 

2     l/„  +  i(«) 

-Ma) 

=    i 

n=s+l 

[sin2«a/I            1       \]    ^  sin2«.a-sin2(7i  +  l)a 

t     a2       U"^      {n  +  l)y]    '             (7H-l)2a=' 

^     *       1  /I            1      \        -    |sin2na-sin2(?i  +  l)a| 
■"  n=s+l  a'  W       {n  +  1  )y    '  „=,                {n  +  iy  a2 

1                 ^      1  sin  a  sin  (2%+ 1)  a  1 

^{s^+l) 

,  1  sin  a  1     °°            1 

2a2^       a2      „=,+!  (71  +  1)2 

1       1 
<-,+  - 

TT- 

sin  a  1  /"*      dr 

a'      Is   i^+iy 

<^  +  (- 

1 

'+i)i«r 

Therefore 

2    l/n.l 

(«)- 

-/n 

^  ^1      sin^a     sin^sa      fsin^ sa     sin2(s  +  l)a^       1       1 

(«)l^       „2                 ,2„2       ^(^,2„2       1        (5+l)2a2;  +  ,r2  +  ^ 

<1  + 

1         -2 
-  +  —  ■ 

TT          TT- 

Since  this  expression  is  independent  of  a,  the  result  required  has  been  obtained  t. 

00 

Hence,  if  X   An(x)   converges,   the    series   defining.  G{x,   a)   converges 
uniformly  with  respect  to  a  for  all  values  of  a,  and,  as  stated  above, 
lim  G (x,  a)  =  G (x,  0)  =  ^0  +  i  An{x)  =f{x). 

a^O                                                                     n=l 
Example.     1{  E  (x,  a,  ^)  =      ^ —    -  ---^ ^^-^ — ^ ^ ^ shew 

that  ff{.v,  a,  ^)-*-f{x)  when  f{x)  converges  if  a,  /3-»-0  in  such  a  way  that  a//3  and  fija 
remain  finite.  (Riemann.) 

*  Since  x~'^  sin  x  decreases  as  x  increases  from  0  to  tt. 
t  This  inequality  is  obviously  true  when  a  =  0. 


180  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

9-621.     Riemanns  second  lemma.     With  the  notation  of  §§  9-6-9-6f,  if 
a..,  6,^0.  th^  lim  J-(^+2a)  +  f(.-2«)-2f(.)  ^  ^  ^^  ^„  „^,,,^^  „^  ^^ 

For  la-'[F{x+2oL)+F{x-1a)-^F{x)]  =  A,a+  ^  -— -^„(^;);    but 


sin'''  na 


bv  ^  9-11  example  3,  if  a  >  0,  ^  — ^ —  =  i  (tt  -  a) ;  and  so,  since 

•^  "^  n=i    wa 

,    ,  ,         ^  sin'^wa  .    .  ^ 

n  =  l  i  m=l      ''<'  "     J 

it  follows  from  §  3-35  example  2,  that  this  series  converges  uniformly  with 
regard  to  a  for  all  values  of  ct  ^  0*. 

But  lim  la-'{F(x+2a)  +  F(x-2a)-2F{x)] 


=   lim 


Ao{x)a+^{ir-a)A,{x)+  2  gn(cc)  {An+i(x) -  An(x)] 

n  =  l 

and  this  limit  is  the  value  of  the  function  when  a  =  0,  by  §  3-32;  and  this 
value  is  zero  since  lim  An(x)  =  0.     By  symmetry  we  see  that  lim  =  lim. 

9'63.     Riemanns  theorem-f  on  trigonometrical  series. 

Two  trigonometrical  series  which  converge  and  are  equal  at  all  points  of 
the  range  (— tt,  tt),  ^uith  the  exception  of  a  finite  number  of  points,  must  have 
corresponding  coefficients  equal. 

An  immediate  deduction  from  this  theorem  is  that  a  function  of  the  type  considered 
in  §  9-23  cannot  be  represented  by  any  trigonometrical  series  in  the  range  ( -  tt,  tt)  other 
than  the  Fourier  series.     This  fact  was  first  noticed  by  Du  Bois  Reymond. 

We  observe  that  it  is  certainly  possible  to  haVe  other  expansions  of  (say)  the  form 

CO 

Oq  +   2   (oto  cos  I  mx  +  /3,„  sin  |  mx), 

which  represent  f{x)  between  0  and  2it  ;  for  write  .^'  =  2^,  and  consider  a  function  (^  (^), 
which  is  such  that  </)(^)=/(2|)  when  -^7r<^<^7r,  and  4>i^)=9ii)  when  -7r<|<  ^^ir, 
and  when  ^7r<^<7r,  where  g  {^)  is  any  function  satisfying  Dirichlet's  conditions.  Then  on 
expanding  0  (^)  in  a  Fourier  series  of  the  form 

ao+  2   (a„iCOS  m£  +  /3„iC0sm^), 

this  expansion  represents /(.x-)  when  -  7r<.^•<7^  ;  and  clearly  by  choosing  the  function  c/  (^) 
in  different  ways  an  unlimited  number  of  such  expansions  can  be  obtained. 

The  question  now  at  issue  is,  whether  other  series  })roceeding  in  sines  and  cosines  of 
integral  multiples  of  x  exist,  which  differ  from  Fourier's  expansion  and  yet  represent  f{x) 
between   -  rr  and  n. 

"*      Sill''  tJlCL 

*  If  we  define  f7„  (a)  by  the  equations  (/„  (a)  =  ^  (tt- a)  -    2i  ,-,      ,  (a4=0),  and  r/,^(0)  =  i7r, 

then  (/,i(a)  is  continuous  when  a  >  0,  and  (;„_,.,  (a)  c<  gn(a). 

+  The  proof  we  give  is  due  to  Cantor,  Journal  fur  M<ith.  lxxii. 


9-621-9  632]  Fourier  series  181 

If  possible,  let  there  be  two  trigonometrical  series  satisfying  the  given 
conditions,  and  let  their  difference  be  the  trigonometrical  series 

»=i 
Then  f{x)  =  0  at  all  points  of  the  range  (—  tt,  tt)  with  a  finite  number  of 
exceptions;  let  ^i,  ^2  be  a  consecutive  pair  of  these  exceptional  points,  and 
let  F{x)  be  Riemann's  associated  function.      We    proceed   to   establish   a 
lemma  concerning  the  value  of  F{oi;)  when  ^i<x<  ^2- 

9'631,  Schwartz'  lemma*.  In  the  range  |i<^<|2j  ^{^)  ^^  <^  linear  function  of  x, 
if  f{x)  =  0  in  this  range. 

For  if  ^=1  orif  ^=-1 

<f^ix)  =  d^F{x)-F{^,)--^-^'^{F{^,)-Fi$,y^-ih\x-^0i$2-:^) 

is  a  continuous  function  of  ^  in  the  range  |^i<a7<^2)  ^^^  <t>{^i)  —  ^  {$2)  =  ^- 

If  the  first  term  of  4>{x)  is  not  zero  throughout  the  range  t  there  will  be  some  point 
x=c  at  wliich  it  is  not  zero.  Choose  the  sign  of  6  so  that  the  first  term  is  positive  at  c, 
and  then  choose  h  so  small  that  <^  (c)  is  still  positive. 

Since  ^(^)  is  continuous  it  attains  its  upper  bound  (§  3*62),  and  this  upper  bound  is 
positive  since  cp  (c)>0.     Let  (j)  (x)  attain  its  upper  bound  at  Ci,  so  that  Ci  +  ^i,  Ci  +  ^-i- 

Then,  by  Riemann's  first  lemma, 

a-*0  «^ 

But  (f)  (Cj  +  a)  ^(j)  (ci),  (^  (Cj  —  a)  ^  <^  {Cj),  so  this  limit  must  be  negative  or  zero. 

Hence,  by  supposing  that  the  first  term  of  ^  (x)  is  not  everywhere  zero  in  the  range 
(li,  ^2))  we  have  arrived  at  a  contradiction.  Therefore  it  is  zero  ;  and  consequently  F{x)  is 
a  linear  function  of  x  in  the  range  |i<.^'<^2-     The  lemma  is  therefore  proved. 

9"632.     Proof  of  Riemann's  Theorem. 

We  see  that,  in  the  circumstances  under  consideration,  the  curve  y  =  F{x) 
represents  a  series  of  segments  of  straight  lines,  the  beginning  and  end  of 
each  line  corresponding  to  an  exceptional  point ;  and  as  F{x),  being  uniformly 
convergent,  is  a  continuous  function  of  x,  these  lines  must  be  connected. 

But,  by  Riemann's  second  lemma,  even  if  ^  be  an  exceptional  point, 

lim  F^^-^^)  +  J'(^-^)-^F{^)  ^  ^ 

Now  the  fraction  involved  in  this  limit  is  the  difference  of  the  slopes  of 
the  two  segments  which  meet  at  that  point  whose  abscissa  is  ^ ;  therefore  the 
two  segments  are  continuous  in  direction,  so  the  equation,  y  =  F{x)  represents 

*  Quoted  by  G.  Cantor,  Journal  fiir  Math,  lxxii. 

+■  If  it  is  zero  throughout  the  range  F  (x)  is  a  linear  function  of  .v. 


182  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

a  single  line.     If  then  we  write  F{x)=^cx  +  c',  it  follows  that  c  and  c'  have 
the  same  values  for  all  values  of  x.     Thus 

00 

^A(,x'^  —  cx  —  c'=  ^  n—^An{x), 

the  right-hand  side  of  this  equation  being  periodic,  with  period  27r. 

The  left-hand  side  of  this  equation  must  therefore  be  periodic,  with  period 

27r.     Hence 

A,  =  0,     c  =  0, 

00 

and  —  c'=  X  n-^An{x). 

M=l 

Now  the  right-hand  side  of  this  equation  converges  uniformly,  so  we  can 
multiply  by  cos  nx  or  by  sin  nx  and  integrate. 

This  process  gives 

■an  =  —  c'  I      cos  nxdx  —  0, 


7rn~ 


'7rn~-  6„  =  —  c'  I     sin  nxdx  =  0. 


Therefore  all  the  coefficients  vanish,  and  therefore  the  two  trigonometrical 

00 

series  whose  difference  is  J-o  -f-  2  An{x)  have  corresponding  coefficients  equal. 

n=l 

This  is  the  result  stated  in  §  9"63. 

9"7.     Fourier  s  representation  of  a  function  by  an  integral''^. 

It  follows  from  §  9"23  example  1  that,  if  f{x)  be  continuous  except  at  a 
finite  number  of  discontinuities  and  if  it  have  limited  total  fluctuation 
in  the  range  (—  oo  ,  oo  ),  then,  if  x  be  any  internal  point  of  the  range  (—  a,  /3), 

lim  [^  sm(2m-H)(^-a;)^^^^^^  ^  ^.^  ^^^_^  ^.^  ^  ,^^^  ^  2^)  +y(^  _  2^)}. 
Mt-*-ooJ -a  (t  —  X)  e_^o 

Now  let  X  be  any  real  number,  and  choose  the  integer  m  so  that 
X  =  2m  -I- 1  +  277  where  0  ^  77  <  1. 

Then        [     {sin  X  (i -«)- sin  (2m  +  1)  («-«;)}  (^-a;)-\/"(^)  tZ^ 

J   —a 

2  {cos  (2m  -^  1  -F  7;)  {t  -  x)]  .  {sin  'n{t~  x)]  {t  -  x)-^f(t)  dt 

as    m-*QO    by    §    9-21,    since    (t  -  x)-^  f  {t)  simj  (t  -  x)    has    limited    total 
fluctuation. 

*  Theorie  Anaiytique  de  la  Chaleur,  Ch.  ix. 


9*7]  FOURIER  SERIES  183 

Consequently,  from  the  proof  of  Lebesgue's  lemma  (§  9'22),  it  is  obvious 
that  if  /     \f{t)\dt  and   1       \f{t)dt\  converge,  then* 

J  0  J  -co 

limf    ^'^)Stlf^f(^t)dt  =  ^7r{f(x  +  0)+f{a^-0)], 


and  so 


lim  f      I  Tcos  w  (« -  ^)  du\f{t)  dt  =  ^tt  {/(a;  +  0)  +f{x  -  0)}. 


To  obtain  Fourier's  result,  we  must  reverse  the  order  of  integration  in 
this  repeated  integral. 

For  any  given  value  of  A.  and  any  arbitrary  value  of  e  there  exists  a 
number  ^  such  that 


r\f{t)\dt<he/x; 
J  p 

writing  cos  u{t-  x)  .f{t)  =  j>  (t,  u),  we  havef 

I    \j(f>(t,u) dii>  dt-      \j     4){t,  u) dt\  dii 

=    I    \i    (f)  {t,  ii)  du  i  dt  +  i     \i    (f) {t,  u)  dul  dt 

-j    \j     (f>{t,n)dt\du-l   \j     <f>(t,u)dtldi 

=  I  I     \l(f}{t,u)  dul  dt-  I  \  I    j>{t,  u)  dt\  du 

<  1     \  I    \(f>{t,  u)\dur  dt+  I  \<j>  (t,  u)  I  dt^du 

<2X      \f{t)\dt<€. 
J  s 


Since  this  is  true  for  all  values  of  e,  no  matter  how  small,  we  infer  that 

•  —  00     /"A.  /"A    r-aa 


/•<»   rK        rK  /•<»  r- 

=  ;  similarly 

J  0    J  0        J  0  J  0  Jo 


0         J  Q  J  0 


to  lim 


means  the  double  limit  lim  I       .     If  this  limit  exists,  it  is  of  course  equal 

p^-oo,(r-*-x   J  -P 


t  The  equation    |      i     =  l      I     is  easily  justified  by  §  4*3,  by  considering  the  ranges  within 
J  0  ;  0      ./  0  7  0 

which /(a;)  is  continuous. 


184  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

Hence    ^tt  [f{x  +  0)  +f{x  -  0)}  =  lim  [    [      cos  u  (t  -  x)f{t)  dt  du 


^00       fOO 

=  j     I      COS  Ji  {t  —  x)  f  (t)  dt  du. 

J  0    J  -00 


This  result  is  known  as  Fourier's  integral  theorem* . 
Example.     Verify  Fourier's  integral  theorem  directly  (i)  for  the  function 

(ii)  for  the  function  defined  by  the  equations 

fix)  =  l,     {-l<x<l);    f{x)=0,     {\x\>l).  (Rayleigh.) 

REFERENCES. 
G.  F.  B.  RiEMANN,  Ges.    Werke,  pp.  213-250. 
E.  W.  HoBSON,  Functions  of  a  Real   Variable,  Chaj^.  vii. 
H.  Lebesgue,  Lecons  sur  les  Series  Trigonometriques.     (Borel  tract.) 
C.  J.  DE  LA  Vall^e  Podssin,  Cours  d' Analyse,  t.  ii.  Chap.  iv. 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

.    1.     Obtain  the  expansions 

1  —  r  cos  2         ,  «        ^ 

(a) r,  =  1+  r  cos  z  +  r^  cos  2z+ ..., 

^  '     l-2rG0iiz  +  r^ 

(b)  -  log (1  —  2r  cos z  +  r^)  =  —r  cos z  —  ^r^ cos  2z  —  ~r^  cos  3z—  .,,, 

,  ,  r  sin  z  .  1    o    •    ^       ^    n   ■    ^ 

(c)  arc  tan  ,        =rsinz  +  --r^  8in2z  +  --')-^iiin3z+..., 

'  1  -  }•  cos  s  2  3 

,  ,,  I  ,       2r  sin  z         .  1    o   •    „      1    r   •    ,- 

{a}/  arc  tan  .j ^  =  r  sin  z  +  -r^  sm  3z  +  -  r^  sm  02  4- ... , 

and  shew  that,  when  |  r  |  <  1,  they  are  convergent  for  all  values  of  z   in  certain  strips 
parallel  to  the  real  axis  in  the  2-plane. 

2.  Expand  x'-^  and  x  in  Fourier  sine  series  valid  when  —  tt  <x<jr;  and  hence  find 
the  value  of  the  series 

1    •    o        1    ■    o        1    •     . 

sin .r -  — ,  sin  2x  +  ^,  sin  Sx  -  —,  sin  ix  +  ..., 
2-i  ,^'  4^ 

for  all  values  of  x.  (Jesus,  1902.) 

3.  Shew   that   the  function   of    x   represented   by  2  n~'^  sin  nx  sin-  na,   is   constant 

j(=i 

(0<.^'<2a)  and  zero  {2a<x  <tv),  and  draw  a  graph  of  the  function. 

(Pembroke,  1907.) 

4.  Find  the  cosine  series  re})rosenting  f  {x)  where 

_/' {x)  —  ii\nx-\- cos  X  {0<x-^\n)    ■ 

/ (.r)  =  (siiK-i?  —  cos  07  {\TT^x<ir).         (Peterhouse,  1906.) 

*  For   a   proof   of   the    theorem   when  f{x)    is   subject   to   less   stringent   restrictions,   see 

Hobson,  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable,  §§  492-493.     The  reader  should  observe  that,  although 

[^       f\  /'""       f  /"°°  1 

bra    I  j      exists,  the  repeated  integral   I  \    I      sin  ?f  (f -a;)  ci?/  -/(f)  dt  does  not. 

A^x./  -X  ./  0  j  _x    (,_/  0  J 


FOURIER  SERIES 


185 


5.     Shew  that 


sin  Snx     sin  bnx  '  sin  Inx  .     ,  , 

HinTTX-i —  H — H i-...  =  ^Tr[x], 


3  5  7 

where  [x]  denotes  + 1  or  -  1  according  as  the  integer  next  inferior  to  x  is  even  or  uneven, 
and  is  zero  if  x  is  an  integer.  (Trinity,  1895.) 

6.     Shew  that  the  expansions 


and 


log 


log 


2  cos  ^  X 


2  sin  X  X 


=  cos  o;-  -  cos  2a;  +  .j  cos  ^x. 


-COS  X—  r  cos 207-=  cos  3a;... 
2t  o 


are  valid  for  all  real  values  of  x,  except  multiples  of  tt, 

7.  Obtain  the  expansion 

«     (  _ )"» cos  tnx 

and  find  the  range  of  values  of  x  for  which  it  is  applicable. 

8.  Prove  that,  if  0<a?<27r,  then 


=  (cos  X + cos  2.r)  log  ( 2  cos  -x\-\--x  (sin  1x  +  sin  x)  —  cos x, 

(Trinity,  1898.) 


sin  X      2  sin  'ix     3  sin  2x  _Tr  sinh  a{iT  -x) 

aHT2  "^  a2  +  22  "*"  a2:r32  "^  "•  ~  2       sinlTa^i^       ' 

(Trinity,  1895.) 

9.     Shew  that  between  the  values  -  n  and  +  tt  of  .r  the  following  expansions  hold  : 

2    .  /  sin  X       2  sin  2x     3  sin  3.^ 

sin  7nx=-  sni  tott    ~ —  „  ~  -^ •>  +  "52 J  ~ 


/   1 

cos  mX=-  sin  JJITT  (  ;;^ — H 


TO  cos  X     m  cos  2a;      m  cos  3.r 

+ 


V2m  ^  12  -  r)f'       22  -  ^2        3^  -  m^ 
gmx^g-mx      2/1       mcoax     m  COS  2a;     m  cos  3.*' 

10.     Let  07  be  a  real  variable  between  0  and  1,  and  let  n  be  an  odd  number  ^  3. 
Shew  that 

,     ,,      1       2*1,      7nit 

(  —  lY=--\ —   2   —  tan cos  2?tt7ra7, 


if  X  is  not  a  multiple  of  - ,  where  s  is  the  greatest  integer  contained  in  nx  ;  but 

(Berger.) 


^     1      2    =^^     1  ,      mrr 

0= -H —   2    -  tan cos  27mrx, 

11        n  m=\  "i  '* 


if  X  is  an  integer  multiple  of  \jn, 

11.  Shew  that  the  sum  of  the  series 

^  +  47r ~  1    2    m~^  sin  § mir  cos  2»i7ra7 
/«  =  i 

is  1  when  0<x<}^,  and  when  *<.^■<l,  and  is  —  1  when  ]^<x<'i. 

12.  If 


(Trinity,  1901.) 


shew  that,  when  -  l<a-'<l. 


ae«»  _   =^   a"  l'^  {x) 


cos47r.t;      cos67r.r  ,     ,,  ,22»-ijr2'' 


22n  '  32n 

.     ^  sin  47r.r     sin67r.'«;  ,     ,,  ,, 

sm27ra;+   ^,„,^-  +    g.^.^   +. ..  =  (-)"+! 


F2„(^), 

^2,.,l(.^•). 


2h  : 

22it^'2»  +  l 

2?J  +T! 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 


186  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  IX 

13.     If  m  is  an  integer,  shew  that,  for  all  real  values  of  x, 

^    1.3.5...(2m-l)  fl  ,      OT  „     ,       m{m-\) 

cos2»»^ = 2        ^    ,~cr^^ 1  o  +  — TT  ^^^  2^7  + , — -\^, — ~  COS  Ax 

2.4.6  ...2m       [2      m  +  l  (TO+l)(m  +  2) 

m(m  — l)(m  — 2)  "j 

"^ (;n+'l)(m  +  2)(m  +  3)  ^^^  ^-^  +  •  •  •  j' ' 


COS'""- '07 


4  2.4.6...(2m-2)   fl      2to-1        ^       (2m-l)(2m-3)         ,  ) 

-^lT3.5..:(2m-l)i2  +  2^;^^"^'^+(2/n+l)(2m  +  3)^"'^^+--r 


14.  A  point  moves  in  a  straight  line  with  a  velocity  which  is  initially  u,  and  which 
receives  constant  increments,  each  equal  to  u,  at  equal  intervals  r.  Prove  that  the  velocity 
at  any  time  t  after  the  beginning  of  the  motion  is 


u      ut      u    ^    I     .     2m7rt 
-  +  -  +  -    2   -  sin 

2        T        -T  jn=im  T 


(Trinity,  1894.) 


and  that  the  distance  traversed  is 

ut ,        .      UT       Mr     *     1  2riint\ 

2r  '12      27r'^M=i»i  t 

15.  If 

f(x)=  2  p^^sill(6J^-3).^'-2   2   -^  sin(2«- 1)  .r 

Z  JZ  [  .          sin  hx     sin  Ix     sin  1  \x 
+  —  jsm^-- ^  +  -,^, 112- +• 

shew  that  /(  +  0)=/(7r-0)= -Jtt, 

and  /(J^  +  0)-/(l^-0)=-|7r,     /(|^+0)-/(f7r-0)=j7r. 

Observing  that  the  last  series  is 

6    *   sin^(2w- 1)  TT  sin  (2/1- l):r 

^  „!i     '       (2^rri)2  ' 

draw  the  graph  of/(j;).  (Math.  Trip.  1893.) 

16.  Shew  that,  when  0<^<7r, 

/ W  =  -^  (  cos.r--  cos  5.r+^  cos  Ix-^^  cos  11^  +  ...  1 

=  sin  2x  +  ^  sin  4a"  +  j  sin  8a'  +  ^  sin  10:*;+...  ♦ 

where  /(■^)  =  ;|7r  (0<.r<i7r), 

/(■*')=0  (l7r<.r<§7r), 

f{x)^\iv  (§7r<a.-<7r). 

Find  the  sum  of  each  series  when  .r  =  0,  ^tt,  fw,  tt,  and  for  all  other  values  of  x. 

(Trinity,  1908.) 

17.  Prove  that  the  locus  represented  by 

X    (_)«-i   , 

2       — -, —  sm  nx  sm  ny — 0 
«=]       n" 

is  two  systems  of  lines  at  right  angles,  dividing  the  coordinate  plane  into  squares  of 
area  tt^.  (Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

18.  Shew  that  the  equation 

2   ^—^ ,  -^  =0 


FOURIER  SERIES  187 

represents  the  lines  y=  ±ni-n^  {m=0,  I,  2,  ...)  together  with  a  set  of  arcs  of  ellipses  whose 
axes  are  n  and  3~*  tt,  the  arcs  being  placed  in  squares  of  area  rr^.  Draw  a  diagram  of  the 
locus.  (Trinity,  1903.) 

19.  Shew  that,  if  the  point  (x,  y,  z)  lies  inside  the  octahedron  bounded  by  the  planes 
±^±y±2=»r,  then 

*   ,     ,      ,  sin  nx  sin  ny  sin  nz     1 

(Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

20.  Circles  of  radius  a  are  drawn  having  their  centres  at  the  alternate  angular  points 
of  a  regular  hexagon  of  side  a.  Shew  that  the  equation  of  the  trefoil  formed  by  the  outer 
arcs  of  the  circles  can  be  put  in  the  form 

""^    =1  +  J^,  cosSd-J^  COS  ee  +  K^T.coaQe- ..., 


6^3a      2^2.4  5.7  "'8.10 

the  initial  line  being  taken  to  pass  through  the  centre  of  one  of  the  circles. 

(Pembroke,  1902.) 
21.     Draw  the  graph  represented  by 

r     ^      2m    .     TT  (1       *   (  — )"coswTO^1 


a 


m[2'^„ti  'l-{nmf    j' 


where  m  is  an  integer.  (Jesus,  1908.) 

22.  With  each  vertex  of  a  regular  hexagon  of  side  2a  as  centre  the  arc  of  a  circle  of 
radius  2a  lying  within  the  hexagon  is  drawn.  Shew  that  the  equation  of  the  figure 
formed  by  the  six  arcs  is 

2a  ^  „=i  {6n  —  l)(6n+l) 

the  prime  vector  bisecting  a  petal.  (Trinity,  1905.) 

23.  Shew  that  if  c>0, 


lim    f" 


'  1  1 

e~'^  cot  x  sin  {2n  +  l)  x .  dx=^ir  tanh  ^  cir. 

(Trinity,  1894.) 

24.  Shew  that 

sin(2»  +  l)a;    dx        1         . ,  , 

^— ^ — -- .  =  -7rC0thl. 

0  sm.r         l+x^     2 

(King's,  1901.) 

25.  Shew  that  when  - 1  <a;<l  and  a  is  real 

sin  (2n+l)  6  sin  {\-\-x)6      6      ^/)_     1     sinha.r 
sin^  a^  +  6^      ~  ~2^  sinh  a  ' 

(Math.  Trip.  1905.) 


lim    /"" 

M-*-00  J  0 


lim    [" 


26.  Assuming  the  possibility  of  expanding  f{x)  in  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of 
the  form  lAfiSinkx,  where  ^  is  a  root  of  the  equation  ^cosa^  +  6  sina^=0  and  the 

summation  is  extended  to  all  positive  roots  of  this  equation,  determine  the  constants  A^. 

(Math.  Trip.  1898.) 

1  * 

27.  If  /(■^)  =  H«o+  2  (a„cos  ;ia;+6,isin?«^) 

is  a  Fourier  series,  shew  that,  iif{x)  satisfies  certain  general  conditions, 

4       /"*  1    dt  4   /"^  1    dt 

an=-P  I    f  {t)  cos  nt  tan  -  t -— ,      b,^=-    I   f  (t)  sin  nt  tan- t -- . 

IT      J  0  '  2,       t  '"'Jo  2       t 

(Beau.) 


CHAPTER   X 

LINEAR  DIFFERENTIAL  EQUATIONS 

lO'l.    Linear  Differential  Equations*.   Ordinary  points  and  singular  points. 

In  some  of  the  later  chapters  of  this  work,  we  shall  be  concerned  with  the 
investigation  of  extensive  and  important  classes  of  functions  which  satisfy 
linear  differential  equations  of  the  second  order.  Accordingly,  it  is  desirable 
that  we  should  now  establish  some  general  results  concerning  solutions  of 
such  differential  equations. 

The  standard  form  of  the  linear  differential  equation  of  the  second  order 

will  be  taken  to  be 

dru        /  ^du         .  .         .  ,  .  . 

S.+i>«3-  +  2W"  =  0  (A). 

and  it  will  be  assumed  that  there  is  a  domain  aS'  in  which  both  p  (z),  q  (z)  are 
analytic  except  at  a  finite  number  of  poles. 

Any  point  of  >S^  at  which  p  (z),  q  (z)  are  both  analytic  will  be  called  an 
ordinary  point  of  the  equation ;  other  points  of  S  will  be  called  singular 
'points. 

10'2.  Solution-f  of  a  differential  equation  valid  in  the  vicinity  of  an 
ordinary  point. 

Let  h  be  an  ordinary  point  of  the  differential  equation,  and  let  Si  be  the 
domain  formed  by  a  circle  of  radius  r^,  whose  centre  is  h,  and  its  interior,  the 
radius  of  the  circle  being  such  that  every  point  of  S^  is  a  point  of  8,  and  is 
an  ordinary  point  of  the  equation. 

Let  z  be  a  variable  point  of  S^. 

In  the  equation  write  u^v  exp  \-  ^\   p(^)d^i  ,  and  it  becomes 


]" 


^J  b 


£  +  ^(-)^  =  0    (B), 

where  /(.)  =  ^(.)  _  ^  ^^  _  i  j^(,)|, 

*  The  analysis  contained  in  this  chapter  is  mainly  theoretical ;  it  consists,  for  the  most  part, 
of  existence  theorems.  It  is  assumed  that  the  reader  has  some  knowledge  of  practical  methods 
of  solving  differential  equations  ;  these  methods  are  given  in  works  exclusively  devoted  to  the 
subject,  such  as  Forsyth,  xi  Treatise  on  Differential  Equations  (1914). 

t  This  method  is  only  applicable  to  equations  of  the  second  order.  For  a  method  applicable 
to  equations  of  any  order,  see  Forsyth,  Differential  Equations,  vol.  iv.  (1902),  Chap.  i. 


101,  10-2]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL  EQUATIONS  189 

It  is  easily  seen  (§  5*22)  that  an  ordinary  point  of  equation  (A)  is  also 
an  ordinary  point  of  equation  (B). 

Now  consider  the  sequence  of  functions  Vniz),  analytic  in  Sb,  defined  by 
the  equations 

Vq  (z)  =  «„  4- «!  (^  -  h), 

where  ao,  a^  are  arbitrary  constants. 

Let  M,  fihe  the  upper  bounds  of  \J{z)\  and  |vo('2')|  in  the  domain  St. 
Then  at  all  points  of  this  domain 

I  Vn (z)  I  ^  /A^"  \z-b  {"^/(n  !). 

For  this  inequality  is  true  when  n  =  0;  if  it  is  true  when  n  =  0, 1, . , .  m  —  1, 
we  have,  by  taking  the  path  of  integration  to  be  a  straight  line, 


Vm  (^)  I  = 


{^-z)J(OVm-r{Od^ 
b 

j;^^J'^\^-z\.\j(o\f^Mm-^\^-b'r-.^^^^^ 

1  r\z-b\ 

{■m-l)y  'Jo 

1 

m 


<  —  f^M"^  \z-b  l""^. 


Therefore,  by  induction,  the  inequality  holds  for  all  values  of  n. 

Also,  since  |  Vn  (z)  \  ^ , —  when  z  is  in  S^  and  2  /Ai¥'V^^'7(^  0  con- 

n !  n=o 

00 

verges,  it  follows  (§  3*34)  that  v{z)=  S  v„  (z)  is  a  series  of  analytic  functions 

n=0 

uniformly  convergent  in  Si ;  while,  from  the  definition  of  Vn  (z), 

^^Vn{z)  =  -jy{OVn-^(Odt  (W=l,  2,  3,   ...) 


it  follows  (§  5-3)  that 


b 
-T-2  Vn  (z)  =  -J{z)  Vn-i  (z), 


d^{z)  ^  d%{z)      ^  dh!n{z) 
dzr  dz-       H^i     dz^ 


=  -J(z)v(z). 

Therefore  v{z)  is   a  function    of  z,    analytic   in   S^,    ivhich   satisfies   the 
differential  equation 

d-v(z)  T,    ^      r    s        rv 

az- 


190  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  X 

and,  from  the  value  obtained  for  -r-  Vn{z),  it  is  evident  that 

ivhere  a^,  a^  are  arbitrary. 

10'21.      Uniqueness  of  the  solution. 

If  there  were  two  analytic  solutions  of  the  equation  for  v,  say  v^{z)  and  v^{z) 
such  that  Vi(6)  =  v.^Q))  =  a„  v/{b)  =  v^  (b)  =  a^,  then,  writing  w{2)  =  v^{z)  -  v^{z), 
we  should  have 

Differentiating  this  equation  n-2  times  and  putting  ^^  =  6,  we  get 

w<")  (b)  +  J{b)  w<«-^'  (b)  +  n-2  C\  J'  (6)  w<*-^)  (6)  +  . . .  +  J"*-^'  (6)  w  (6)  =  0. 

Putting  w  =  2,  3,  4,  . , .  in  succession,  we  see  that  all  the  differential  coefficients 
of  w{z)  vanish  at  b  ;  and  so,  by  Taylor's  theorem,  w{z)  =  0 ;  that  is  to  say  the 
two  solutions  Vi(z),  v^iz)  are  identical. 


Writing  u{z)  =  v(z)exip  \-^j   p{^)dd, 


we  infer  without  difficulty  that  u{z)  is  the  only  analytic  solution  of  (A)  such 
that  u{b)  =  Ao,  u' (b)  ^  A^,  where 

Ao  =  ao,     Ai  =  ai-^p(b)ao. 

Now  that  we  know  that  a  solution  of  (A)  exists  which  is  analytic  in  S^ 
and  such  that  u{b),  u  (b)  have  the  arbitrary  values  A^,  A-^,  the  simplest 
method  of  obtaining  the  solution  in  the  form  of  a  Taylor's  series  is  to  assume 

00 

u{z)=  2  An{z  —  hY,  substitute  this  series  in  the   differential  equation  and 

M  =  0 

equate  coefficients  of  successive  powers  oi  z  —  b  to  zero  (|  3"73)  to  determine 
in  order  the  values  o{  A^,  A^,  ...  in  terms  of  ^o>  A-y. 

[Note.  In  practice,  in  carrying  out  this  process  of  substitution,  the  reader  will  find 
it  much  more  simple  to  have  the  equation  'cleai-ed  of  fractions'  rather  than  in  the 
canonical  form  (A)  of  §  10-1.  Thus  the  equations  in  examples  1  and  2  below  should 
be  treated  in  the  form  in  which  they  stand  ;  the  factors  1  -z'^,  (■'-2)  (2  —  3)  should  not  be 
divided  out.     The  same  remark  applies  to  the  examples  of  §§  10"3,  10'32.] 

From  the  general  theory  of  analytic  continuation  (§  5'5)  it  follows  that 
the  solution  obtained  is  analytic  at  all  points  of  8  except  at  singularities 
of  the  differential  equation.  The  solution  however  is  not,  in  general, 
'  analytic  throughout  8 '  (|  5'2  cor.  2,  footnote),  except  at  these  points,  as  it 
may  not  be  one-valued ;  i.e.  it  may  not  return  to  the  same  value  when  z 
describes  a  circuit  surrounding  one  or  more  singularities  of  the  equation. 


10-21,  10-3]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL  EQUATIONS  191 

[The  property  that  the  solution  of  a  linear  differential  equation  is  analytic 
except  at  singularities  of  the  coefficients  of  the  equation  is  common  to  linear 
equations  of  all  orders.] 

When  two  particular  solutions  of  an  equation  of  the  second  order  are  not 
constant  multiples  of  each  other,  they  are  said  to  form  a  fundamental  system. 

*  Example  1.     Shew  that  the  equation 

(l-«2)tt"-23%'  +  |M=0 

has  the  fundamental  system  of  solutions 

Determine  the  general  coefficient  in  each  series,  and  shew  that  the  radius  of  con- 
vergence of  each  series  is  1. 

Example  2.     Discuss  the  equation 

(2-2)(3-3)?<"-(22-5)  ic'-\-2u  =  Q 
in  a  manner  similar  to  that  of  example  1. 

10'3.     Points  which  are  regular  for  a  differential  equation. 

Suppose  that  a  point  c  of  ^  is  such  that,  although  p  (z)  or  q  (2)  or  both 
have  poles  at  c,  the  poles  are  of  such  orders  that  (z  —  c)p(z),  {z  —  cfq{z)  are 
analytic  at  c.  Such  a  point  is  called  a  regular  point*  for  the  differential 
equation.  Any  poles  oi p{z)  or  of  q{z)  which  are  not  of  this  nature  are  called 
irregular  points.  The  reason  for  making  the  distinction  will  become  apparent 
in  the  course  of  this  section. 

If  c  be  a  regular  point,  the  equation  may  be  written  f  , 

where  P{z  —  c),  Q{z  —  c)  are  analytic  at  c;  hence,  by  Taylor's  theorem, 

P{z-c)=po  +  Pi{z-  c)+p^{z-cy-ir  ... 

Q{z-c)  =  q,  -\-q^{z-c)+qo{z-cf+  ..., 

where  po,  Pi,  ...,5'o,  qi,  ■■•  are  constants;  and  these  series  converge  in  the 
domain  Sc  formed  by  a  circle  of  radius  r  (centre  c)  and  its  interior,  where  r  is 
so  small  that  c  is  the  only  singular  point  of  the  equation  which  is  in  Sg. 

Let  us  assume  as  a  formal  solution  of  the  equation 


u  =  {z  —  cY 


1  +  S  an{z  -  cf 


n  =  l 


where  a,  aj,  a2,  ...  are  constants  to  be  determined. 

*  The  name  'regular  point'  is  due  to   Thome,  CrelWg  Journal,  Bd.  lxxv.  (1872),  p.  266. 
Fuchs  had  previously  used  the  phrase  'point  of  determinateuess.' 
t  Frobenius  calls  this  the  normal  form  of  the  equation. 


192  THE   PROCESSES    OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  X 

Substituting  in  the  differential  equation  (assuming  that  the  term-by-term 
differentiations  and  multiplications  of  series  are  legitimate)  we  get 

a((x-l)+  t  an(0L  +  n)(a+n-l){z-c)"] 


{z-cy 


n=l 


+  (z-  cY  P{z-c). 


a-f-  X  an{oL-^n){z-cy 


-\-{z-cYQ{z-c) 


l  +  tan{z-cf 


=  0. 


Substituting  the  series  for  P  (z  —  c),  Q(z  —  c),  multiplying  out  and  equating 
to  zero  the  coefficients  of  successive  powers  of  z  —  c,  we  obtain  the  following 
sequence  of  equations : 

a,  {{a+iy  +  {po-l)(a.  +  l)  +  q,]  +  ap^  +  q^  =  0, 
a^ {{a  +  2y  +  (po -  1) (a  +  2)  +  q,}  +  a,  {(a  +  l)p,  +  q,]  +  ap.^  +  q,=  0, 

iin  {(a  -I-  Tif  +  {po-l){a.  +  n)  +  q,] 

n-l 

+  2  an-m  {(a  +  n-  m)  p^  +  qm]  +  ^Pn  +  5n  =  0. 

The  first  of  these  equations,  called  the  indicial  equation*,  determines  two 
values  (which  may,  however,  be  equal)  for  a.  The  reader  will  easily  convince 
himself  that  if  c  were  an  irregular  point,  the  indicial  equation  would  have 
been  (at  most)  of  the  first  degree ;  and  he  will  now  appreciate  the  distinction 
made  between  regular  and  irregular  singular  points. 

Let  a  =  pi,  a  =  p„  be  the  roots  f  of  the  indicial  equation 
F{a)  ^ce  +  {p,-l)a.  +  q,  =  0; 
then  the  succeeding  equations  (when  a  has  been  chosen)  determine  a^,  a.^,  ..., 
in  order,  uniquely,  provided  that  ^(o  -|-  ri)  does  not  vanish  when  w  =  1,  2,  3, . . . ; 
that  is  to  say,  if  a  =  pi,  that  p,  is  not  one  of  the  numbers  p-^-\-\,  p-^-\-1,  ...\ 
and,  if  a  =  p^,  that  pi  is  not  one  of  the  numbers  /32  +  1,  P2  +  2, 

Hence,  if  the  difference  of  the  exponents  is  not  zero  or  an  integer,  it  is 
always  possible  to  obtain  two  distinct  series  which  formally  satisfy  the 
equation. 

•     Example.     Shew  that,  if  m  is  not  zero  or  an  integer,  the  equation 
is  formally  satisfied  by  two  series  whose  leading  terms  are 

determine  the  coefficient  of  the  general  term  in  each  series,  and  shew  that  the  series 
converge  for  all  values  of  z. 

*  The  name  is  due  to  Cayley,  Quarterly  Journal,  vol.  xxi.  (1886),  p.  326. 

t  The  roots  pi,  p>   of  the  indicial  equation  are   called   the    exjjoiients   of   the    differential 
equation  at  the  point  c. 


10-31] 


LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL   EQUATIONS 


193 


10*31.     Convergence  of  the  eaypansion  of  §  10*3. 

If  the  exponents  p^,  p^  are  not  equal,  let  p^  be  that  one  whose  real  part  is 
not  inferior  to  the  real  part  of  the  other,  and  let  pi  —  Pi  =  8;  then 

F{pi  +  n)=n{s  +  n). 

Now,  by  §  5*23,  we  can  find  a  positive  number  M  such  that 
\pn\<  Mr-"",     \qn\<  Mr-"",     \p^Pn  +  qn  I  <  Mr-"", 
where  M  is  independent  of  w ;  it  is  convenient  to  take  M^l. 
Taking  a  =  pj ,  we  see  that 


„  .iPiPi  +  qil^ 


M 


M 


F{p^  +  l)\     r|s  +  l|      r' 

since  |s  +  1 1  ^  1. 

If  now  we  assume  |  ««  I  <  M^r~^  when  w  =  1,  2,  ...  m  —  1,  we  get 

ni-l 


ttm,     — 


t  a^-t  {{pi  +  m-t)pt  +  qt]+  piPm  +  Qr 
^ipi  +  m) 


m—l  m-1 

S  I  a^_t  !  .  I  Pipt  +  qt\  +  \  piPm  +  ^m  I  +    S   (m-t)\  arn-t  \\pt\ 


7n\s  -\-  ni 


t=i 


< ^-^ ,J .. 

m'^\\  +  sni  ^  I 

Since  1 1  +  sm~'^  |  ^  1,  because  R  (s)  is  not  negative,  we  get 

m  +  1 


O'm.     "^^ 


2m 


J\^m,f,—m  ^  J^m^—m 


and  so,  by  induction,  |  a,i  |  <  M^r~'^  for  all  values  oi  n. 

If  the  values  of  the  coefficients  corresponding  to  the  exponent  p^  be 
<-h\  (-h,  ••■  we  should  obtain,  by  a  similar  induction, 

\an\<  M'^K'^r-'^, 

where  k  is  the    upper   bound   of  jl— s|~\   \l—^s^-\  jl— ^s|-^...;    this 
bound  exists  when  s  is  not  a  positive  integer. 

We  have  thus  obtained  two  formal  series 

w,  (z)  =  {z-  c)"'     1  +  S  a„  (2  -  cy 


w.^(z)  =  (z-  cf' 


l+%an'(z-cY 


The  first,  however,  is  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic  functions 
when  \z  —  c\<  rM~\  as  is  also  the  second  when  \z  —  c\<  rM~^K~\  provided 

W.   M.  A.  '  13 


194  THE   PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  X 

in  each  case  that  arg  (z  —  c)  is  restricted  in  such  a  way  that  the  series  are 
one-valued;  consequently,  the  formal  substitution  of  these  series  into  the 
left-hand  side  of  the  differential  equation  is  justified,  and  each  of  the  series  is 
a  solution  of  the  equation ;  provided  always  that  p^  —  p^  is  not  a  positive 
integer  or  zero*. 

With  this  exception,  we  have  therefore  obtained  a  fundamental  system  of 
solutions  valid  in  the  vicinity  of  a  regular  singular  point.  And  by  the  theory 
of  analytic  continuation,  we  see  that  if  all  the  singularities  in  >S^  of  the  equation 
are  regular  points,  each  member  of  a  pair  of  fundamental  solutions  is  analytic 
at  all  points  of  S  except  at  the  singularities  of  the  equation,  which  are  branch- 
points of  the  solution. 

10*32.  Derivation  of  a  second  solution  in  the  case  when  the  difference 
of  the  exponents  is  an  integer  or  zero. 

In  the  case  when  pi  —  p2  =  s  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero,  the  solution 
W2{z)  found  in  §  lO'Sl  may  break  downf  or  coincide  with  Wi(z). 

If  we  write  u  =Wi  (z)  ^,  the  equation  to  determine  ^  is 
of  which  the  general  solution  is 

=  A  +  Bj(z-  c)-Po-^p^  g  {z)  dz, 

where  A,  B  are  arbitrary  constants  and  g{z)  is  analytic  throughout  the 
interior  of  any  circle  whose  centre  is  c,  which  does  not  contain  any  singu- 
larities of  P  (2:  —  c)  or  singularities  or  zeros  of  {z  —  c)~p^  w^  (z)  ;  also  g  (c)  =  1. 

Let  g{z)  =  l  +  :ig,,.{z-cy\ 

Then,  if  5  :jfe  0, 


l;=A+BJ'i^l+i{z-  c)4  (z  -  c)-^->  dz 


=  A+B 


-l(z-  c)-  -  t'  -^  (z  -  c)"-  +  g..  log  (z  -  c) 

4-  5   -^"  {z-cy- 

n  =  s^\  n  —  s 


*  If  Pi  -  P2  is  a  positive  integer,  k  does  not  exist ;  if  Pi  =  p2 ,  the  two  solutions  are  the  same. 

t  The  coetlieient  «/  may  be  imletermiuate  or  it  may  be  infinite ;  in  the  former  case  202  (z) 
will  be  a  solution  containing  two  arbitrary  constants  a^'  and  a/ ;  the  series  of  which  a/  is  a 
factor  will  be  a  constant  multiple  of  Wi{~). 


10-32]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL   EQUATIONS  195 

Therefore  the  general   solution   of  the   differential   equation,  which   is 
analytic  at  all  points  of  C  (c  excepted),  is 

A  w,  (z)  +  B[g,Wi  (z)  log  {z-c)  +  w  (z)] , 

where,  by  §  2-53,      w (z)  ==.(z  -  cyA  -  -  +  t  hn(z -  c)""]  , 

the  coefficients  A„  being  constants. 

When  5  =  0,  the  corresponding  form  of  the  solution  is 

00 

A  Wi (z)  +  B    Wi (z) log (z-c)  +  {z- cY"-  1  hn(z-  cY 
L  M=i 

The  statement  made  at  the  end  of  §  1031  is  now  seen  to  hold  in  the 

exceptional  case  when  s  is  zero  or  a  positive  integer. 

In  the  special  case  when  g8  =  0,  the  second  solution  does  not  involve 
a  logarithm. 

The  solutions  obtained,  which  are  valid  in  the  vicinity  of  a  regular  point 
of  the  equation,  are  called  regular  integrals. 

Integrals  of  an  equation  valid  near  a  regular  point  c  may  be  obtained 
practically  by  first  obtaining  w^  {z),  and  then  determining  the  coefficients  in 

CO 

a  function  w^ {z)  =  X  bn(z  —  c/^+'S  by  substituting  w^ (z) log {z  —  c)  +  w^ (z)  in 

the  left-hand  side  of  the  equation  and  equating  to  zero  the  coefficients  of  the 
various  powers  of  ^  —  c  in  the  resulting  expression.  An  alternative  method 
due  to  Frobenius*  is  given  by  Forsyth,  Treatise  on  Differential  Equations, 
pp.  243-258. 

»     Example  1.     Shew  that  integrals  of  the  equation 

d^u      I  du        „ 
-y~,  H -. —  m^u  =  0 

dz^      z  dz 

regular  near  3  =  0  are 

,  ,  ,  ,  «=        m2'*32n     /l        1  1\ 

and  wM^ogz-^^^  ^,,^,  (^_  +  _  +  ...+-J. 

Verify  that  these  series  converge  for  all  values  of  z. 

♦     Example  2.     Shew  that  integrals  of  the  equation 

,      , ,  d^u     ,^       ^.dtil        ^ 
.(.-l)^  +  (2.-l)^  +  _«=0 

regular  near  2=0  are 

,  ,    ,,  ^    ^      /1.3...27i-l\2    /111  1\ 

Verify  that  these  series  converge  when  |2|<1  and  obtain  integrals  regular  near  2  =  1. 

*  Crelle,  lxxvi.  pp.  214-224. 

13—2 


196  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  X 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  hypergeometric  equation 

is  satisfied  by  the  hypergeometric  series  of  §  2-38. 

Obtain  the  complete  solution  of  the  equation  when  c  =  l. 

10'4.     Solutions  valid  for  large  values  of  \z\. 

Let  ^=l/^'i;  then  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation  is  said  to  be 
valid  for  '  large  values  of  |  ^^  | '  if  it  is  valid  for  sufficiently  small  values  of  \zi\; 
and  it  is  said  that  '  the  point  at  infinity  is  an  ordinary  (or  regular  or  irregular) 
point  of  the  equation '  when  the  point  z^  =  0  is  an  ordinary  (or  regular  or 
irregular)  point  of  the  equation  when  it  has  been  transformed  so  that  z^  is 
the  independent  variable. 

Since 


d?u 
dz^ 


,  .  du         ,  .  ,  dhi   .    (^   .,        ,     [1\]  du         /1\ 


we  see  that  the  conditions  that  the  point  z  =  cc  should  be  (i)  an  ordinary 
point,  (ii)  a  regular  point,  are  (i)  that  2z  —  z'^p{z),  z*q(z)  should  be  analytic 
at  infinity  (§  5"62)  and  (ii)  that  zp  (z),  z^q  (z)  should  be  analytic  at  infinity. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  every  point  (including  infinity)  is  either  an  ordinary  point  or 
a  regular  point  for  each  of  the  equations 

(jL  1L  d'iL 

0(l-z)^-^  +  {c -(«  +  &  + 1)2}  -r-ahu  =  ^, 
dz^  '  dz 

„,  d'^u     r^  du        , 

where  a,  h,  c,  n  are  constants. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  every  point  except  infinity  is  either  an  ordinary  point  or  a 
regular  point  for  the  equation 

dH        du 
dz''         dz 
where  n  is  a  constant. 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  equation 


has  the  two  solutions 


dz^         dz 


1       1,3^  1       3.4.5.6  1 

3'     s-i  ■'■2.7  25  +  27477:9?"^' 


the  latter  converging  when  |  s  i>  1. 


10"5.     Irregular  singularities  and  confluence. 

Near  a  point  which  is  not  a  regular  point,  an  equation  of  the  second  order 
cannot  have  two  regular  integrals,  for  the  indicial  equation  is  at  most  of 
the  first  degree ;  there  may  be  one  regular  integral  or  there  may  be  none. 
We  shall   see    later    (e.g.  §  16-3)  what  is    the   nature  of  the  solution  near 


10-4-106]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL   EQUATIONS  197 

such  points  in  some  simple  cases.    A  general  investigation  of  such  solutions* 
is  beyond  the  scope  of  this  book. 

It  frequently  happens  that  a  differential  equation  may  be  derived  from 
another  differential  equation  by  making  two  or  more  singularities  of  the 
latter  tend  to  coincidence.  Such  a  limiting  process  is  called  conflixence; 
and  the  former  equation  is  called  a  confluent  foi'm  of  the  latter.  It  will  be 
seen  in  §  10"6  that  the  singularities  of  the  former  equation  may  be  of  a  more 
complicated  nature  than  those  of  the  latter. 

10"6.     The  differential  equations  of  mathematical  physics. 

The  most  general  differential  equation  of  the  second  order  which  has 
every  point  except  a^,  a^,  a^,  ^4  and  00  as  an  ordinary  point,  these  five  points 
being  regular  points  with  exponents  a^,  /3r  at  ar{r  =  1,  2,  3,  4)  and  exponents 
/*],  /Lt2  at  00  ,  may  be  verified f  to  be 

dz^'      ir=i     z-CLr     ]  dz      u=i(^ -««•)'  U  (z  -  a,)     ^ 

r=l 

where  A  is  such  that  J  /Aj  and  ^2  are  the  roots  of 

fju'  +  fllt  (ar  +  /3r)  -S\+l  ttr^r  +  A  =  0, 
[r=l  }        r  =  l 

and  B,  G  are  constants. 

The  remarkable  theorem  has  been  proved  by  Klein  §  and  B6cher||  that 
all  the  linear  differential  equations  which  occur  in  certain  branches  of 
Mathematical  Physics  are  confluent  forms  of  the  special  equation  of  this 
type  in  which  the  difference  of  the  two  exponents  at  each  singularity  is  \ ; 
a  brief  investigation  of  these  forms  will  now  be  given. 

If  we  put  /S,.  =  a,.  +  I,  (r  =  1,  2,  3,  4)  and  write  ^  in  place  of  z,  the  last 
written  equation  becomes 

dhi      {   4   ^  -  2a,|  du      (  I  a,K  +  i)     AC'  +  2B^-^G\     ^ 

r=l 

^*   Some   elementary  investigations   are   given   in  Forsyth's   Differential  Equations   (1914). 
Complete  investigations  are  given  in  his  Theory  of  Diff'erential  Equations,  Vol.  iv. 

t  The  coeflELcients  of  —  and  u  must  be  rational  or  they  would  have  an  essential  singularity 

4  4 

at  some  point;   the   denominators   of  p(z),q{z)  must  be  IT  (2  -a,.),   II  (2  -  a,.)-  respectively; 

putting  p  (z)  and  q{z)  into  partial  fractions  and  remembering  that  j)  {^)  =  0{z~^),q{z)  =  0{z~-) 
as  ]  J  I  -*■  00  ,  the  required  result  follows  without  difficulty. 

4 
X  It  will  be  observed  that  fj-i,  1J.2  are  connected  by  the  relation-/ij  +  /x2+  2  (0^4-/3,.)=  3. 

r=l 
§    Ueber   lineare   Differentialgleichungen   der   zweiter    Ordnung,    p.   40;    see   also   Vorlesuny 
ilher  Lame'schen  Funktionen. 

IS   Ueber  die  Reihenentwickeluugen  der  Potentialtheorie,  p.  193. 


198 


THE  PEOCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  X 


where  (on  account  of  the  condition  /ij  —  /ij  =  |) 

This  differential  equation  is  called  the  generalised  Lam6  equation. 

It  is  evident,  on  writing  a^^a^  throughout  the  equation,  that  the 
confluence  of  the  two  singularities  a^,  a^  yields  a  singularity  at  which  the 
exponents  a,  ^  are  given  by  the  equations 

a  +  y8  =  2  (ai  +  a^),     a/3  =  Wj  («!  +  i)  +  ^2  (a2  +  i)  +  D, 

where  D  =  (^ai^  +  'IBa^  +  G)l[(a^  -  as)  (a^  -  a^)]. 

Therefore  the  exponent-difference  at  the  confluent  singularity  is  not  ^, 
but  it  may  have  any  assigned  value  by  suitable  choice  of  B  and  C.  In  like 
manner,  by  the  confluence  of  three  or  more  singularities,  we  can  obtain 
one  irregular  singularity. 

By  suitable  confluences  of  the  live  singularities  at  our  disposal,  we  can 
obtain  six  types  of  equations,  which  may  be  classified  according  to  (a)  the 
number  of  their  singularities  with  exponent-difference  ^,  (b)  the  number  of 
their  other  regular  singularities,  (c)  the  number  of  their  irregular  singu- 
larities, by  means  of  the  following  scheme,  which  is  easily  seen  to  be 
exhaustive* : 


(a) 

(&) 

{c) 

(I) 

3 

1 

0 

Lam^ 

(11) 

2 

0 

1 

Mathieu 

(III) 

1 

2 

0 

Legendre 

(IV) 

0 

1 

1 

Bessel 

(V) 

1 

0 

1 

Weber,  Hermite 

(VI) 

0 

0 

1 

Stokes  t 

These  equations  are  usually  known  by  the  names  of  the  mathematicians 
in  the  last  column.  Speaking  generally,  the  later  an  equation  comes  in 
this  scheme,  the  more  simple  are  the  properties  of  its  solution.  The 
solutions  of  (II) — (VI)  are  discussed  |  in  Chapters  XV — Xix  of  this  work. 
The  derivation  of  the  standard  forms  of  the  equations  from  the  generalised 
Lame  equation  is  indicated  by  the  following  examples : 

*  For  instance  the  arrangement  (a)  3,  (h)  0,  (c)  1  is  inadmissible  as  it  would  necessitate  six 
initial  singularities. 

t  The  equation  of  this  type  was  considered  by  Stokes  in  his  researches  on  Diffraction 
(Collected  Papers,  ii.);  it  is,  however,  easily  transformed  into  a  particular  case  of  Bessel's 
equation  (example  6,  below). 

X  For  properties  of  equations  of  type  (I),  the  reader  is  referred  to  the  works  of  Klein  and 
Forsyth  cited  at  the  end  of  this  chapter ;  also  to  Todhunter,  The  Functions  of  Laplace,  Lame 
and  Bessel. 


106]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL  EQUATIONS  199 

•  Example  1.     Obtain  Lamp's  equation 

(where  h  and  n  are  constants)  by  taking 

01  =  02=03  =  04  =  0,     85  =  /i(n  +  l)a4,     ^G=ha^^ 
and  making  a4  -^  » , 

•  Example  2.     Obtain  the  equation 

dhi  .(ij  ,     i   \  c?«  ,  (a-16y  +  32g0w_ 
^f'     Vc     f-i/^C  4C(f-l) 

(where  a  and  ^  are  constants)  by  taking  ai  =  0,  a2=l>  ^^^^  making  a3  =  a4-*oo.     Derive 
Mathieu's  equation  (§  19"1) 

T-^  +  (a + 1 6^  cos  22)  24 = 0 

by  the  substitution  ^^cos^  z. 

Example  3.     Obtain  the  equation 

by  taking 

«i  =  «?=0,     a3=a^=l,     01  =  02=03=0,     04  =  J. 

Dei'ive  Legendre's  equation  (§§  15*13,  15'5) 

by  the  substitution  (=z~'^. 

'     Example  4.     By  taking  ai  =  a2=0,  01  =  02  =  03=04  =  0,  and  making  a3=a4-*-x,  obtain 
the  equation 


Derive  Bessel's  equation  (§  17"11) 

,^       _ 
dz'^       dz 


od^a       du     ,  „       „, 
z^  -r^  +  z  -^  +{z^  -  n^)  u  =  0 


by  the  substitution  f =2^. 

^    Example  5.     By  taking  ai  =  0,  01  =  02  =  03  =  04  =  0,  and  making  a2==«3  =  '^4^  ^  1  obtain 
the  equation 

Derive  Weber's  equation  (§  165) 


dz'^ 
by  the  substitution  f =2^. 


^  +  (.i  +  i-i22)«  =  0 


Example  6.     By  taking  0^  =  0,  and  making  a^.^'cc  {r  =  l,  2,  3,  4),  obtain  the  equation 
By  taking 


dh/ 


u=^{B,C+C,)^v,     Z?iC+Ci  =  (5A)*4 
shew  that 

,,d^v       dv     ,  .,     ^. 

''d?^'dz^^':-^^'=''- 


200  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAJ*.  X 

Example  7.  Shew  that  the  general  form  of  the  generalised  Lamd  equation  is  un- 
altered (i)  by  any  homographic  change  of  independent  variable  such  that  oc  is  a  singular 
point  of  the  transformed  equation,  (ii)  by  any  change  of  dependent  variable  of  the  type 
u  =  {z  —  a,.)^  V. 

Example  8.  Deduce  from  example  7  that  the  various  confluent  forms  of  the 
generalised  Lam^  equation  may  always  be  reduced  to  the  forms  given  in  examples  1-6. 

[Note  that  a  suitable  homographic  change  of  variable  will  transform  any  three  distinct 
points  into  the  points  0,  1,  c» .] 

10'7.     Linear  differential  equations  with  three  singularities. 

Let  -^^+p(,)-  +  q(,)u  =  0 

have  three,  and  only  three  singularities  *,  a,  b,  c ;  let  these  points  be  regular 
points,  the  exponents  thereat  being  a,  a' ;  ^,  l3' ;  y,  <y'. 

Then  p  {z)  is  a  rational  function  with  simple  poles  at  a,  h,  c,  its  residues  at 
these  poles  being  1  —  a  —  a',  1  —  /3  —  yS',  1  —  7  —  7' ;  and  as  ^^  -*  00  ,  p{z)  —  2z~^ 
is  0(0-     Therefore 

z  —  a  z  —  0  z  —  c 

andf  a  +  a'+yS  +  )S'  +  7  +  7'  =  1. 

In  a  similar  manner 

g  (A  =  K(«-fe)(o^-c)  ^  ^^'(b-c)(b-a)  _^  yy'{c-a)(c-b)] 
\  z  —  a  z  —  b  z  —  c  j 


{z  -  a){z  —  b)  {z  —  c)' 
and  hence  the  differential  equation  is 

^  +  [!-«-«      I-  ^-^'     1  -  7  -  7  )  dM 
dz^      \     z  -  a  z  -  b  z  —  c     ]  dz 

+  |««^(«-^)(ft-c)  ^  I3^'{b-c){b-a)  ^  yy'{c-a){c-b)] 
(  z  —  a  z  —  b  z  —  c  J 

u 

(z  —  a){z  —  b)  {z  —  c) 
This  equation  was  first  given  by  PapperitzJ. 

To  express  the  fact  that  u  satisfies  an  equation  of  this  type  (which  will  be 
called  Riemann's  P-equation),  Riemann§  wrote 

{a      b      c        \ 
«'     ^'     7         J 

*  The  point  at  infinity  is  to  be  an  ordinary  point. 

t  This  relation  must  be  satisfied  by  the  exponents. 

X  Math.  Ann.  xxv.  (1885),  p.  213. 

§  Abhandlungen  d.  K.  Gesell.  d.  Wiss.  zu  Gottingen,  vii.  (1857).  It  will  be  seen  from  this 
memoir  that,  although  Eiemann  did  not  apparently  construct  the  equation,  he  must  have  inferred 
its  existence  from  the  hypergeometric  equation. 


107,  10*71]  LINEAR  DIFFERENTIAL   EQUATIONS  201 

The  singular  points  of  the  equation  are  placed  in  the  first  row  with  the 
corresponding  exponents  directly  beneath  them,  and  the  independent  variable 
is  placed  in  the  fourth  column. 


4   Example.     Shew  that  the  hypergeometric  equation 

,,       .  d^u     ,      ,       ,     ,.   ,du 
z{l-z)^,  +  {c-{a  +  b+l)z}-^^ 

is  defined  by  the  scheme 


10"71.     Transformations  of  Riemanns  P-equation. 

The  two  transformations  which  are  typified  by  the  equations 

(a     b      c       \  (a  h  c 


(I)     (t^J   (t-7J  ^    «  ^  7     ^    =P    «+A;    ^-k-l     y+l     A, 

[a  ^'  y     J  [o!  +  k    ^'-k-l     y+l      J 

(a  b  c 

a  /3  7 


(where  z-^,  a^,  b^,  c^  are  derived  from  z,  a,  b,  c  by  the  same  homographic 
transformation)  are  of  great  importance.  They  may  be  derived  by  direct 
transformation  of  the  differential  equation  of  Papperitz  and  Riemann  by 
suitable  changes  in  the  dependent  and  independent  variables  respectively ; 
but  the  truth  of  the  results  of  the  transformations  may  be  seen  intuitively 
when  we  consider  that  Riemann's  P-equation  is  determined  uniquely  by  a 
knowledge  of  the  three  singularities  and  their  exponents,  and  (I)  that  if 


I*  /%  —  r\^ 


then  «i  =  f 7  j    ( 7  J  XI   satisfies  a  differential   equation  of  the  second 

order  with    the   same   three    singular   points   and  exponents  a  4-  h,  a'  +  A' ; 
^  —  k  —  I,  ^'  —  k  —  I;  y  +  I,  y'  +  I ',  and  that  the  sum  of  the  exponents  is  1. 

Also  (II)  if  we  write  z  =  j^ ^^ ,  the  equation  in  z^  is  a  linear  equation 

of  the  second  order  with  singularities  at  the  points  derived  from  a,  b,  c  by  this 
homogi-aphic  transformation,  and  exponents  a,  a  ;  /y,  l3' ;  y,  y  thereat. 


202  THE  PROCESSES  OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  X 

10*72.     The  connexion  of  Riemanns  P-equation  with  the  hypergeometric 
equation. 

By  means  of  the  results  of  |  10'71  it  follows  that 

(ahc^                                        (a               h  '^l 

Pa      /.     ,      4  =  (:-^:nH7P        O        ^^a^,  ,        ^\ 

[a!     /3'    y      J                                         [oi'-OL    /3'  +  a  +  7  7-7      J 

r     0              00  1          \ 

[oL  —a    ^'  +  oi  +  <y     7'  -  7      J 

where  x  =  -. r^— ^ . 

{z  —  b){c  —  a) 

Hence,  by  §  10'7   example,  the  solution  of  Riemann's  P-equation  can 
always  be  obtained  in  terms  of  the  solution  of  the  hypergeometric  equation 

whose  elements  a,  6,  c,  a?  are  a. -\-  B  -^  <y,  a-\-  B'  +  <y,  1  +  a  —  a',  )-  yf^ ~ 

'  r-       /,  '  (^z  —  b)  {c  —  a) 

respectively. 

10"8.     Linear  differential  equations  with  two  singularities. 

If,  in  §  10*7,  we   make  the   point  c   a  regular   point,  we    must   have 

1  /A         '      n         .    aoi'(a-b)(a-c)      /3/3' (b  -  c)  (b  -  a)  ^    , 

1—7-7=0,   77  =0   and    — ^ — +  '-^-— ^ ^-y^ ^    must   be 

z  —  a  z  —  0 

divisible  hy  z  —  c,  in  order  that  p  {z)  and  q  {z)  may  be  analytic  at  c. 
Hence  a  +  a'  +  /S  +  /3'  =  0,  aa'  =  ySyS',  and  the  equation  is 
dru      il-a-a!      1  -f-  «  +  g']  da        aa  {a  -  b)"  u    _ 
dz'  ^  I    z'-  a      ^      z-b     I  d^  "•■  {z-af(7^'by  ~    ' 

of  which  the  solution  is 

.  fz  —  aY      ^  (z  —  a 
u  =  A\ J     +  B 


^z  —  b)  \z  —  b/ 

that  is  to  say,  the  solution  involves  elementary  functions  only. 
When  a  =  a',  the  solution  is 

REFERENCES. 

L.  FucHs,  Crelle,  lxvi. 

L.  W.  Thom^,  Crelle,  Lxxv,  Lxxxvii. 

L.  ScHLESiNGER,  ffandhuch  der  linearen  Differentialgleichungen. 

G.  Frobknius,  Crelle,  Lxxvi. 

G.  F.  B.  RiEMANN,  Ges.  Math.    Werke,  pp.  67-87. 

F.  C.  Klein,   Ueher  lineare  Differentialgleichungen  der  zweiter  Ordnung. 

A.  R.  Forsyth,  Theori/  of  Differeiitial  Equations,  Part  iii.  (Vol.  iv.). 

T.  Craig,   Differential  Equations. 


10-72]  LINEAR   DIFFERENTIAL   EQUATIONS  203 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that  two  solutions  of  the  equation 

are  « -  j^ «*  +  ... ,  1  -  J2^  + . . .,  and  investigate  the  region  of  convergence  of  these  series. 

2.  Obtain  integrals  of  the  equation 

regular  near  z=0,  in  the  form 

16' 


U2  =  Ui  log  Z-^  +  ... 


3.     Shew  that  the  equation 
has  the  solutions 


0?2tt       /        1       1 

^.  +  (^  +  2-4^'^^  =  ^ 


''        l2~^+         80         ""'"•••' 
and  that  these  series  converge  for  all  values  of  z. 

4.  Shew  that  the  equation 

-,-5  +  ^2    ^—^7   J-  +  1  2    7-^T2  +   2    ^  V  ?<  =  0, 

az^         [r=i        Z—ttj.     )    az         (.r=l  (■2  — «r)         r=l  ^  -  (^r) 

where 

2  (a^+/3r)  =  n-2,      2  i)r  =  0,       2  (a,.Z>^  +  a,/3,.)  =  0,      2  (cf^2^r  +  2a,.a^/3^)  =  0, 

r=l  r=l  r=l  r=l 

is  the  most  general  equation  for  which  all  points  (including  qc  ),  except  ai,  ag)  •••  ^»)  ^^^ 
ordinary  points,  and  the  points  a^  are  regular  points  with  exponents  a,.,  /S^  respectively. 

(Klein.) 

5.  Shew  that,  if  ^  +  y  +  /3' + y'  =  ^ ,  then 

pJo     ^      y     s^l^pjy       2/3     y     zi.  (Riemann.) 

U    ^'     y      )  [  i      2^'    i     J 

[The  diflferential  equation  in  each  case  is 

6.  Shew  that  if  y  +  y'  =  i  and  if  w,  w^  are  the  complex  cube  roots  of  unity,  then 


ro    00     1      \        ri    CO   0)2     ^ 

PJo      0      y     3n  =  P-|y     y      y     sj.  (Riemann.) 

IJ     \     y        J 
[The  differential  equation  in  each  case  is 

cPu         2z^     du        Qyy' zu 
'd^^W~\  ^5  ■*■  (sS'^  1)2 


204 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  X 


7.     Shew  that  the  equation 


a-z')'^,-{'-<'  +  ^)^'^,+nin  +  2a)u  =  0 


is  defined  by  the  scheme 


and  that  the  equation 


{l+CV^,  +  n{n  +  2)u=0 


may  be  obtained  from  it  by  taking  a=l  and  changing  the  independent  variable. 

(Halm.) 
8.     Discuss  the  solutions  of  the  equation 


(Cunningham.) 


valid  near  z  =  0  and  those  valid  near  2  =  oo  . 

9.  Discuss  the  solutions  of  the  equation 

d^u     2u  die     ^  du     ^ ,        .        ^ 

^  +  75^-2^^.  +  '^"-^)"=" 

valid  near  2  =  0  and  those  valid  near  2  =  x  . 
Consider  the  following  special  cases  : 

(i)    /^=-i-)       (ii)    M  =  i,       (iii)    ^  +  "  =  3. 

10.  Prove  that  the  equation 

,,       ,  d^u      1  _      ^  .  dii     ,         ,, 

has  two  particular  integrals  the  product  of  which  is  a  single-valued  transcendental 
function.  Under  what  circumstances  are  these  two  particular  integrals  coincident  ? 
If  their  product  be  F [z)^  prove  that  the  particular  integrals  are 


(Curzon.) 


'1,  u-2  =  '^'F{z)  .  exp  \±C  \ 


dz 


F{z)\'z{\-z) 


where  C  is  a  determinate  constant. 


(Lindemann  ;  see  §  19'5.) 


11.  Prove  that  the  general  linear  difierential  equation  of  the  third  order  whose 
singularities  are  0,  1,  00 ,  which  has  all  its  integrals  regular  near  each  singularity  (the 
exponents  at  each  singularity  being  1,  1,  - 1)  is 

(Pu      f 2     ^   I  d'hi  _  J 1 3  1      \  du 

dz^  ■•"  Xz  "*" ^1  j  ~cP       (_7^     V{z-  1)  +  '{z^^\  'dz 


j\__  3  cos'^g  _  3sih^a  1 


,2(,_1)        ,(2_1)2    ■    (,_1); 

where  a  may  have  any  constant  value. 


u  =  0, 


(Math.  Trip.  1912.) 


CHAPTER  XI 

INTEGRAL    EQUATIONS 

ll'l.     Definition  of  an  integral  equation. 

An  integral  equation  is  one  which  involves  an  unknown  function  under 
the  sign  of  integration  ;  and  the  process  of  determining  the  unknown  function 
is  called  solving  the  equation*. 

The  introduction  of  integral  equations  into  analysis  is  due  to  Laplace 
(1782)  who  considered  the  equations 

f{x)  =  je-'  </>  (t)  dt,     g  {x)  ^jt^-'  <f>  (t)  dt 

(where  in  each  case  ^  represents  the  unknown  function),  in  connexion  with 
the  solution  of  differential  equations.  The  first  integral  equation  of  which 
a  solution  was  obtained,  was  Fourier's  equation 


f{x)  =  I      cos  {xt)  ^{t)  dt, 

J    -  OD 


of  which,  in  certain  circumstances,  a  solution  isf 

2   f^ 
(f)  {x)  =  —  I    cos  (ux)f{u)  du, 

f{x)  being  an  even  function  of  x,  since  cos  {xt)  is  an  even  function. 

Later,  Abel  was  led  to  an  integral  equation  in  connexion  with  a  mechanical 
problem  and  obtained  two  solutions  of  it ;  after  this,  Liouville  investigated  an 
integral  equation  which  arose  in  the  course  of  his  researches  on  differential 
equations  and  discovered  an  important  method  for  solving  integral  equations, 
which  will  be  discussed  in  §  11 '4. 

In  recent  years,  the  subject  of  integral  equations  has  become  of  some 
importance  in  various  branches  of  Mathematics ;  such  equations  (in  physical 
problems)  frequently  involve  repeated  integrals  and  the  investigation  of  them 
naturally  presents  greater  difficulties  than  do  those  elementary  equations 
which  will  be  treated  in  this  chapter. 

To  render  the  analysis  as  easy  as  possible,  we  shall  suppose  throughout 
that  the  constants  a,  h  and  the  variables  x,  y,  |  are  real  and  further  that 

*  Except  in  the  case  of  Fourier's  integral  (§  9-7)  we  practically  always  need  continuous 
solutions  of  integral  equations. 

t  If  this  value  of  0  be  substituted  in  the  equation  we  obtain  a  result  which  is,  effectively,  that 
of  §9-7. 


206 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  XI 


a^x,y,  ^^b;  also  that  the  given  function*  K(w,  y),  which  occurs  under  the 
integral  sign  in  the  majority  of  equations  considered,  is  a  real  function  of 
X  and  y  and  either  (i)  it  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables  in  the 
range  {a^x-^h,  a^y  ^h),  or  (ii)  it  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables 
in  the  range  a^y  ^x  ^b  and  K  (x,  y)  =  0  when  y  >  x;  in  the  latter  case 
K(x,  y)  has  its  discontinuities  regularly  distributed,  and  in  either  case  it  is 


easily  proved  that,  i(f(y)  is  continuous  when  a^y  ^b, 
continuous  function  of  x  when  a<.x ^b. 


f{y)  K(x,y)dy  is  & 


ll'll.     An  algebraical  lemma. 

The  algebraical  result  which  will  now  be  obtained  is  of  great  importance  in  Fredholm's 
theory  of  integral  equations. 

Let  {xi,  yi,  2i),  (^2)  y2>  ■^2))  (■^3>  y^i  ■23)  be  three  points  at  unit  distance  from  the  origin. 
The  greatest  (numerical)  value  of  the  volume  of  the  parallelepiped,  of  which  the  lines 
joining  the  origin  to  these  points  are  conterminous  edges,  is  +1,  the  edges  then  being 
perpendicular.     Therefore,  if  Xy?+yr^  +  z^?=\  (r  =  l,  2,  3),  the  upper  and  lower  bounds  of 

the  determinant 

^1 


yi 

Z\ 

y-i 

z% 

yz 

zz 

*'3 

are  ±1. 

A  lemma  due  to  Hadamardt  generalises  this  result. 


Let 


«ii, 


^12)   •••  %jj 
0!22,  ...  a^n 


(t-nli 


=  A 


where  a,„,.  is  real  and   2  a\i,.=  1  (m  =  l,  2,  ...  w)  ;  let  A^^  be  the  cofactor  of  «,„,.  in  D  and 
let  A  be  the  determinant  whose  elements  are  -4,„,.,  so  that,  by  a  well-known  theorem  J, 

Since  2)  is  a  continuous  function  of  its  elements,  and  is  obviously  bounded,  the 
ordinary  theory  of  maxima  and  minima  is  applicable,  and  if  we  consider  variations  in 

n     92> 

air(r=l,  2,  ...  n)  only,  D  is  stationary  for  such  variations  if    2  ^ —  8ai,.  =  0,  where  Saj,., ... 

n 

are  variations  subject  to  the  sole  condition    2  ax,.Sai,.  =  0;  therefore  § 

n 

but  2  airAyr=D,  and  so  \2d\T.-=  D ;  therefore  ^ir  =  Z)aj,.. 

r=\ 

*  Bocher  in  his  important  work  on  integral  equations  {Caiitb.  Math.  Tracts,  No.  10),  always 
considers  the  more  general  case  in  which  K{x,  ?/)  has  discontinuities  regularly  distributed, 
i.e.  the  discontinuities  are  of  the  nature  described  in  Chapter  iv,  example  16.  The  reader  will 
see  from  that  example  that  the  results  of  this  chapter  can  almost  all  be  generalised  in  this 
way.     To  make  this  chapter  more  simple  we  shall  not  consider  such  generalisations. 

t  Bulletin  des  Sciences  Math.  ser.  2,  t.  xvii. 

X  Burnside  and  Panton,  Theonj  of  Equations,  Vol.  11.  p.  40. 

§  By  the  ordinary  theory  of  undetermined  multipliers. 


1111,  112]  INTEGRAL  EQUATIONS  207 

Considering  variations  in  the  other  elements  of  Z),  we  see  that  D  is  stationary  for 
variations  in  all  elements  when  Amr  =  Dumr  (w=l,  2,  ...  n  ;  r=l,  2,  ...  n).  Consequently 
A=D^ .  D,  and  so  Z)"  ■*" '  =  Z)"~  ^     Hence  the  maximum  and  minimum  values  of  D  are  + 1. 

Corollary.     If  a^^  be  real  and  subject  only  to  the  condition  |  a^^  |  <My  since 

r=l 

we  easily  see  that  the  maximum  value  of  |  Z)  |  is  {n^  MY  =  n^^  M^. 

11*2.     Fredholms*  equation  and  its  tentative  solution. 
An  important  integral  equation  of  a  general  type  is 

J  a 

where  f{x)  is  a  given  continuous  function,  X  is  a  parameter  (in  general 
complex)  and  K{x,  |)  is  subject  to  the  conditionsf  laid  down  in  §  111. 
K  {x,  ^)  is  called  the  nucleusl  of  the  equation. 

This  integral  equation  is  known  as  Fredholm's  equation  or  the  integral 
equation  of  the  second  kind  (see  §  11  "S).  It  was  observed  by  Volterra  that  an 
equation  of  this  type  could  be  regarded  as  a  limiting  form  of  a  system 
of  linear  equations.  Fredholm's  investigation  involved  the  tentative  carrying 
out  of  a  similar  limiting  process,  and  justifying  it  by  the  reasoning  given 
below  in  §  11'21.  Hilbert  {Gott.  Nach.  1904)  justified  the  limiting  process 
directly. 

We  now  proceed  to  write  down  the  system  of  linear  equations  in  question, 
and  shall  then  investigate  Fredholm's  method  of  justifying  the  passage  to 
the  limit. 

The  integral  equation  is  the  limiting  form  (when  S-*-0)  of  the  equation 

n 

^  (^)  =/  (■*■)  +  >*■  2  K{x,  x^  (f)  (Xq)  8, 
9=1 

where  Xg - a', _ i  =  S,  XQ  =  a,  x^—h. 

Since  this  equation  is  to  be  true  when  a^x^h,  it  is  true  when  x  takes  the  values 
Xi,  X2, ...  x^;  and  so 

-  XS  2  K{xp,  Xg)  4>  {Xg)+(}i  (Xj,)  =f{Xp)         (p=  1,  2,  ...  n). 

9=1 

*  Fredholm's  first  paper  on  the  subject  appeared  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Sicedish  Academy, 
Vol.  Lvii.  (1900).     His  researches  are  also  given  in  Acta  Mathematica,  Vol.  xxvii.  (1903). 
+  The  reader  will  observe  that  if  K  (x,  ^)  —  0{^>  x),  the  equation  may  be  written 


<p{x)=f{x)+\  [^  K{x,^)4,i^)d^. 


This  is  called  an  equation  with  variable  upper  limit. 

J  Another  term  is  kernel ;  French  noyau,  German  Kern. 


208 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  XI 


This   system   of  equations  for   (\){Xp),  {p  =  \,2,  ...n)   has   a  unique  solution   if  the 
determinant  formed  by  the  coefficients  of  ^  (^'p)  does  not  vanish.     This  determinant  is 

\-\bK{xx,Xi)       -\bK{x-^,  X2)  ...     -X8K{xi,Xn) 
—  \8K{x2,  Xi)     1  -\8K {x2,  X2)  ...     —X8K{x2,  x^ 


I>nW- 


-X8K  {Xn,  Xj)  —\8K  (Xn  ,X2)  ...   l  —  X8K{Xn,  Xn) 

A.  (Xpj  Xp)      A  {^Xpj  Xqj 


:1-X  2  8K{xp,Xp)  +  ^^     2     82 


X3  n 


K    {Xq,    Xp)  K     \Xq,    Xq) 


li.  \Xp,  Xp)     A  [Xpi  Xq)     A  \Xp,  Xy.) 

K{Xq,Xp)       K(Xq,Xq)       K{Xq,Xr) 

on  expanding*  in  powers  of  X. 

Making  S  -*-  0,  %  -»-  qo  ,  and  writing  the  summations  as  integrations,  we  are  thus  led  to 
consider  the  series 

X2    Cb    fb 


i)(X)  =  l-X  j 


K{^u^i)d^i  + 


2! 


d^i  d^2  - 


Further,  if  Dn{x^,  Xv)  is  the  cofactor  of  the  term  in  Z>„(X)  which  involves  K{xv,  a>), 
the  solution  of  the  system  of  linear  equations  is 


(p  (Xf^)  = 


Z>„(X) 


Now  it  is  easily  seen  that  the  appropriate  limitingTform  to  be  considered  in  association 
with  D„  (.i>,  x^)  is  D  (X) ;  also  that,  if  /i  +  i/, 


D,  (.r^,  x,)^\8  \  K{x^,  .Vy)  -  XS  2 

1 


"  ■  V,  '7  =  1 


A  \X^^  Xv)      A  (•^fi,  Xp) 
A  \Xp^  Xv)      A  \Xpj  Xp) 

A  (.^'(X)  Xv)  A  \Xp_^  Xp)  A  (Xfj^^  Xq) 
A  (Xp^  Xv)  A  \Xp^  Xp)  A  (Xp^  Xq) 
A  (Xq^    Xp)       A  (Xqj   Xp)       A  (Xq^   Xq) 

So  that  the  limiting  form  for  8-ii>(.x>,  Xv)  to  be  considered t  is 

K{xp.,Xv)     K{xp.,^^)    j^^ 

A'  (.^^ ,  ^i,)     K  (xp. ,  ^1 )     A'  (.»> ,  I2) 


i>  (.^> ,  Xv ;  X)  =  X  A  (% ,  .r^)  -  X^  I 


^:-/:/: 


(i^l  rf^2 


A(|,,^.)    A(ii,^,)   a: (^1,^2) 
A(6,^.)   A(^„^,)   a: (^2,12) 

Consequently  we  are  led  to  consider  the  possibility  of  the  equation 

ct>  (^)=/(^) +^  fy  (•^■>  ^ ;  ^)/(^)  ^^> 

giving  the  solution  of  the  intcgnxl  equation. 

*  The  factorials  appear  because  each  determinant  of  .s  rows  and  columns  occurs  s  I  times  as 
p,  q,  ...  take  all  the  vakies  1,  2,  ... «,  whereas  it  appears  only  once  in  the  original  deter- 
minant for  I>„(X). 

t  The  law  of  formation  of  successive  terms  is  obvious  from  those  written  down. 


11-21]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  209 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  in  the  case  of  the  equation 

<f){x)  =  x  +  \l    xy4){2i)dy, 

we  have 

D{\)  =  \-\\,     D{x,y;  \)  =  \xy 
and  a  solution  is 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  in  the  case  of  the  equation 

(\>{x)  =  x->r\\     {xy  +  ?/2)  0  (^)  dy, 
we  have 

D{x,y;  \)  =  'k{xy+y'^)+\Wxy-lxy-ly^  +  ky), 
and  obtain  a  sohition  of  the  equation. 

11  21.     Investigation  of  Fredholms  solution. 

So  far  the  construction  of  the  solution  has  been  purely  tentative ;  we  nov^^ 
start  ah  initio  and  verify  that  we  actually  do  get  a  solution  of  the  equation ; 
to  do  this  we  consider  the  two  functions  D(\),  B{x,  y;  X)  arrived  at  in  §  11-2. 

We  write  the  series,  by  which  D  (X)  was  defined  in  §  11  "2,  in  the  form 

1+  2  ^  so  that 

since  K  (x,  y)  is  continuous  and  therefore  bounded,  we  have  \K{x,  y)\<  M, 
where  M  is  independent  of  x  and  y]  since  K{x,  y)  is  real,  we  may  employ 
Hadamard's  lemma  (§  ll'll)  and  we  see  at  once  that 

\an\  <'n-  M    .{o  —  a)  . 
Write  71*  il/"  (b  -  a)''  =  n  !  6„ ;  then 

n^*  «^x    (71+  1)5     (V  Wy    J 

f-,    '^y 

since  I  1  +  -  1   ^-  e. 

The  series  2  6„A,"  is  therefore  absolutely  convergent  for  all  values  of  \ ; 

n  =  l 

and  so  (§  2'34)  the  series  1  +  S     ^'      converges  for  all  values  of  X  and  there- 

71=1    nl 

fore  (§  5"64)  represents  an  integral  function  of  \. 

Now  write  the  series  for  D  (x,  y:\)  in  the  form  2    '^     '    . . 

W.    M.   A.  14 


210 


THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS 


[chap.  XI 


Then,  by  Hadamard's  lemma  (§  ll'll), 

W-dx,y)\<n'^''M\h-af-\ 

Vn  (^,  y) 


and  hence    "J^^^-L^   <  c„,  where  c„  is  independent  of  x  and  y  and  2  c„X«+i  is 
n !  «=o 

absolutely  convergent. 

Therefore  I){x,  y;  \)  is  an  integral  function  of  X  and  the  series  for 
D{x,y;\)-  \K{x,  y)  is  a  uniformly  convergent  (§  3-34)  series  of  continuous* 
functions  of  x  and  y  when  a^x^b,  a^y^h. 

Now  pick  out  the  coefficient  of  K  {x,  y)  in  D{x,y;\);  and  we  get 


D(x,y;\)  =  \D  (\)  J^  (x,  y)+t  (-)-X"+^ 


Qn  («,  y) 


where 


rb   rb        rb 

Qn{x,y)=\        ... 

■I  a  J  a        J  a 


0,      K{x,  fo,  ir(^-,|2X...^(^,^n) 


d^i...d^n- 


Expanding  in  minors  of  the  first  column,  we  get  Qn  {oo,  y)  equal  to  the 
integral  of  the  sum  of  n  determinants;  writing  ^i,  ^^, ...  ^m-i,  ^,  ^m,  ••■  fn-i 
in  place  of  |i,  fg,  •••  ^n  in  the  mth  of  them,  we  see  that  the  integrals  of  all 
the  determinants  f  are  equal  and  so 


where 


Q,  (x,  y)  =  -nr  ('...['k  (f,  y)  Pnd^,  . . .  d^n-i, 

J  a  J  a         J  a 


P„  = 


K{x,^),         K(x,^,), 


■  ■    Kix,  ^n-i) 


It  follows  at  once  that 

D{x,y;  \)^\D{X)K{x,  y)  +  \  j'  D  {x,  |;  \)  K  {^,  y)d^. 

J  a 
Now  take  the  equation 

<^{^)=f{^)  +  ^\'  K{ly)<l>{y)dy, 
multiply  by  D{x,  f ;  X)  and  integrate,  and  we  get 

=  rct>(^)D(x,  f ;  \)d^-xt'  r  D(x,  ^;  X)K(^,  y)ct>(y)dyd^, , 

•/a  J  a  J  a 

the  integrations  in  the  repeated  integral  being  in  either  order. 

*  It  is  easy  to  verify  that  every  term  (except  possibly  the  first)  of  the  series  for  D  {x,  y  ;  X) 
is  a  continuous  function  under  either  hypothesis  (i)  or  hypothesis  (ii)  of  §  11-1. 
t  The  order  of  integration  is  immaterial  (§  4-3). 


11'21]  INTEGRAL  EQUATIONS  211 

That  is  to  say 

J  a 

=  f<f> (f ) D (x,  ^;  X) d^ -  f * {D (X,  y;\)-\D  (X)  K{w,  y)\  c}>  (y) dy 

J  a  J  a 

^\D{\)\'K{x,y)4>{y)dy 

■I  a 

=^D{\)[<\>{x)-f{x)], 

in  virtue  of  the  given  equation. 

Therefore  if  D  (X)  4=  0  and  if  Fredholm's  equation  has  a  solution  it  can  be 
none  other  than 


^(.)=/(.,+/V(f)^-§lp<^f; 


D(\) 

and,  by  actual  substitution  of  this  value  of  ^{x)  in  the  integral  equation, 
we  see  that  it  actually  is  a  solution. 

This  is,  therefore,   the   unique   continuous  solution   of  the   equation   if 

D  (X)  4=  0. 

Corollary.     If  we  put  f{x)  =  0,  the  'homogeneous'  equation 

J  a 

has  no  continuous  solution  except  (f)(x)  =  0  unless  Z>(X)  =  0. 

Example  1.     By  expanding  the  determinant  involved  in  Q„  {x,  y)  in  minors  of  its  first 
row,  shew  that 

D{x,y;\)  =  \D{\)K{x,y)^\f'  K{x,^)D{^,y;\)d^. 

J  a 

Example  2.     By  using  the  formulae 

D{\)  =  1+  I  ^^-,     D{x,y;\)  =  \D{\)K{x,y)+  I  ( - )» ^^'^li^ii^'-^) , 


shew  that  /   D{^,^;\)  d^=  -\ 

J  « 


dD{\) 
dX 


Examples.     If        K{x,y)  =  l     (y^x),  K{x,y)  =  0      {y>x), 

shew  that  i>  (X)  =  1  -  (6  -  a)  X. 

Example  4.     Shew  that,  if  K  {x,  y)  =/i  {x) .  f-i  (y ),  and  if 

/    f\{x)h{x)dx==A, 

.'  a 

then 

i>(X)  =  l-^X,     D(x,y;\)  =  \f,{x)f,{y), 

and  the  solution  of  the  corresponding  integral  equation  is 


<t>  (■■^)=/(^-)+|4-jx  jj^^^^'  ^^^  '^^■ 


U— 2 


212  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

Example  5.     Shew  that  if 

K  {x,  y)  =/i  {x)  gi  {y)  +/2  {x)  g<i,  (y), 
then  D  (X)  and  D{x,y;  X)  are  quadratic  in  X  ;  and,  more  generally,  if 

n 

K{x,y)=  2  fm{x)gm{y\ 

OT=1 

then  D  (X)  and  D  {x,  y,  X)  are  polynomials  of  degree  n  in  X. 

11*22.     Volterra's  reciprocal  functions. 

Two  functions  K {x,  y),  k{x,y;  X)  are  said  to  be  reciprocal  if  they  are 
bounded  in  the  ranges  a-^x,  y ^h,  if  any  discontinuities  they  may  have  are 
regularly  distributed  (§  ll'l,  footnote),  and  if 

K{x,y)  +  k{x,y;\)  =  \\    k{x,  ^•,\)K{ly)dl 

•I  a 

We  observe  that,  since  the  right-hand  side  is  continuous*  the  sum  of  two  reciprocal 
functions  is  continuous. 

Also,  a  function  K{x,y)  can  only  have  one  reciprocal  if  Z)(X)=t=0;  for  if  there  were  two, 
their  difference  k^  {x,  y)  would  be  a  continuous  solution  of  the  homogeneous  equation 


h  0^,  3/ ;  ^)  =  ^  \  J^i  {x,  ^•,~^)K  (I,  y)  d^, 


(where  x  is  to  be  regarded  as  a  parameter),  and  by  §  11-21  corollary,  the  only  continuous 
solution  of  this  equation  is  zero. 

By  the  use   of  reciprocal   functions,  Volterra  has   obtained  an  elegant 
reciprocal  relation  between  pairs  of  equations  of  Fredholm's  type. 

We  first  observe,  from  the  relation 

D{x,y;  \)  =  \D(\)K(x,y)  +  \l    D{x,^;  \)K{ly)d^, 

J  a 

proved  in  §  11  "21  that  the  value  of  k  (x,  y;X)  is 

-D{x,y;\)/\\D{X)}, 
and  from  §  11-21  example  1,  the  equation 

k(x,y;\)  +  K{x,y)^xrK{x,^)k(^,y;\)d^ 

J  a 

is  evidently  true. 

Then,  if  we  take  the  integral  equation 

cf>(x)=f(x)  +  xrK{x,  B<i>{^)dl 

J  a 

when  a-^x^  h,  we  have,  on  multiplying  the  equation 

J  a 
*  By  example  10  at  the  end  of  Chapter  iv. 


11-22,  11-23]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  213 

by  k{x,  ^ ;  \)  and  integrating, 

■'  a 

=  fkix,  ^;\)f{^)d^  +  \f'  \'k{x,  ^;  X)K{1  ^,) <\> {^d d^.d^ 

J  a  J  a  J  a 

Reversing  the  order  of  integration*  in  the  repeated  integral  and  making 
use  of  the  relation  defining  reciprocal  functions,  we  get 

\''k{x,^;\)<f>{^)d^ 

J  a 

=  I'k  {X,  ^ ;  X)/(|)  d^  +  r  [K  {X,  ^0  +  k{x,^;  \)]  </,  (f,)  d^„ 

J  a  J  a 

and  so  \  f^k (x,  ^ ;  X.)/(|) d^=-\l^  K {x,  ^,) 0 (f ,) d^, 

J  a  J  —a 

=  -<t>(x)+f{x). 
Hence  f(x)  =  ^  {x)  +  X  ['k{x,  ^;  X)/(^)  d^; 

J  a 

similarly,  from  this  equation  we  can  derive  the  equation 
cl>{x)=f(x)  +  xfK{x,^)cf>{^)dl 

J  a 

so  that  either  of  these  equations  with  reciprocal  nuclei  may  be  regarded  as 
the  solution  of  the  other. 

11-23.     Homogeneous  integral  equations. 

The  equation  (ji(x)  =  X  I    K (x,  ^)  (f) (^) d^  is  called  a  homogeneous  integral 

■J  a 

equation.     We  have  seen  (§11-21  corollary)  that  the  only  continuous  solution 
of  the  homogeneous  equation,  when  D  (X)  4=  0,  is  0  (x)  =  0. 

The  roots  of  the  equation  D  (X)  =  0  are  therefore  of  considerable 
importance  in  the  theory  of  the  integral  equation.  They  are  called  the 
characteristic  numbers  f  of  the  nucleus. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  when  D  (X)  =  0,  a  solution  which  is  not 
identically  zero  can  be  obtained. 

Let:J:  X  =  Xo  be  a  root  m  times  repeated  of  the  equation  D  (X)  =  0. 

Since  D  (X)  is  an  integral  function,  we  may  expand  it  into  the  convergent 

series 

D  (X)  =  c,n  (X  -  Xor  +  c„,+,  (X  -  Xo)'«+'  +  . . .         {m>0,  c,n  +  0). 

*  The  reader  will  have  no  difficulty  in  extending  the  result  of  §  4-3  to  the  integral  under 
consideration. 

t  French  valeurs  caracteristiquen,  German  Eigenwerthe. 

X  It  will  be  proved  in  §  11-51  that,  if  K {x,ij)=K{y,x),  the  equation  D  (\)  — 0  has  at  least  one 
root. 


214  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

Similarly,  since  D  {x,  y;  X)   is   an   integral   function  of  \  there  exists 
a  Taylor  series  of  the  form 

by  §  3 '34  it  is  easily  verified  that  the  series  defining  gn{x,  y),  {n  =  l,  l-\-\,  ...) 
converge  absolutely  and  uniformly  when  a^x  ^.h,  a^y  ^b,  and  thence  that 
the  series  for  D{x,  y;  X)  converges  absolutely  and  uniformly  in  the  same 
domain  of  values  of  x  and  y. 

But,  by  §  11*21  example  2, 


J  a 


dX 


now  the  right-hand  side  has  a  zero  of  order  w  —  1  at  X.O)  while  the  left-hand 
side  has  a  zero  of  order  at  least  I,  and  so  we  have  m  —  l^L 

Substituting  the  series  just  given  for  D  (\)  and  D  {x,  y;\)\n  the  result  of 
§  11 '21  example  2,  viz. 

D{x,y;\)  =  \D(X)K(x,  y)  +  xf'K(x,  ^)D{1  y;  X)d^, 

J  a 

dividing  by  (X  —  X^f  and  making  X  ^  Xq.  we  get 

gi  («>  y)  =  \     K  (x,  f )  gi  (^,  y)  d^. 

J  a 

Hence  if  y  have  any  constant  value,  gi(x,  y)  satisfies  the  homogeneous 
integral  equation,  and  any  linear  combination  of  such  solutions,  obtained  by 
giving  y  various  values,  is  a  solution. 

Corollary.     The  equation 

(^(^)=/(^)-f-Xo  fV(^,^)</,(^)rf^ 

J  a 

has  no  sohition  or  an  infinite  number.     For  if  0  {x)  is  a  solution,  so  is  ^  {x)  +  2  CyQi  {x,  y), 
where  Cy  may  be  any  function  of  y. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  solutions  of 

4>{x)  =  \   r      cos"  {X~^)(li  (I)  d^ 

are  ^  (.2^)  =  cos  (n  -  2r)  .r,  and  (ii{x)=iim{n-2r)x  ;  where  r  assumes  all  positive  integral 
values  (zero  included)  not  exceeding  hi. 

Example  2.     Shew  that 

<^  (:r)  =  X  J  ^  ^  cos"  {x  +  ^)ct>(^)  di 

has  the  same  solutions  as  those  given  in  example  1,  and  shew  that  the  corresponding 
values  of  X  give  all  the  roots  of  Z)(X)  =  0. 


11-3-1 1-4]  INTEGRAL  EQUATIONS  215 

H*3.     Integral  equations  of  the  first  and  second  kinds. 
Fredholm's  equation  is  sometimes  called  an  integral  equation  of  the  second 
kind ;  while  the  equation 

f{x)  =  \\'K{x,^)<^{^)d^ 

J  a 

is  called  the  integral  equation  of  the  first  kind. 

In  the  case  when  K(x,  ^)  =  0  if  ^  >  x,  we  may  write  the  equations  of  the 
first  and  second  kinds  in  the  respective  forms 

f{a^)  =  \\^K{x,^)4>{^)dl 

J  a 

c}>(x)=f(x)  +  \rK(x,^)cf>(^)d^. 

J  a 

These  are  described  as  equations  with  variable  upper  limits. 

11*31.      Volterra's  equation. 

The  equation  of  the  first  kind  with  variable  upper  limit  is  frequently 
known  as  Volterra's  equation.  The  problem  of  solving  it  has  been  reduced 
by  that  writer  to  the  solution  of  Fredholm's  equation. 

Assuming  that  K(x,  |)  is  a  continuous  function  of  both  variables  when 
^  ^x,  we  have 

f(x)=^\rK{x,^)ci>(^)di 

J  a 

The   right-hand  side  has  a  differential  coefficient  (§  4*2  example   1)  if 

^r—  exists  and  is  continuous,  and  so 
ox 

f(x)  =  \K{x,x)(f>{x)  +  \f^-^cf>(^)d^. 

This  is  an  equation  of  Fredholm's  type.  If  we  denote  its  solution  by 
(f>{x),  we  get  on  integrating  from  a  to  x, 

f{x)-f{a)  =  \\''  K{x,^)4>{^)dl 

■J  a 

and  so  the  solution  of  the  Fredholm  equation  gives  a  solution  of  Volterra's 
equation  if  f{a)  =  0. 

The  solution  of  the  equation  of  the  first  kind  with  constant  upper  limit 
can  frequently  be  obtained  in  the  form  of  a  series*. 

11"4.     The  Liouville- Neumann  method  of  successive  substitutions  f. 
A  method  of  solving  the  equation 

cj>(x)=^f(x)  +  \f'K(x,^)<f>(^)d^, 

•'  a 

which  is  of  historical  importance,  is  due  to  Liouville. 

*  See  example  7,  p.  225  ;  a  solution  valid  under  fewer  restrictions  is  given  by  Bocher. 
t  Liouville's  Journal,  ii.  (1837),  iii.  (1838).      K.  Neumann's  investigations  were  later  (1870) ; 
see  his  Untersuchu7igen  iiber  das  logarithinische  and  Neicton'sche  Potential. 


216  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

It  consists  in  continually  substituting  the  value  of  <f>(x)  given  by  the 
right-hand  side  in  the  expression  ^  (^)  which  occurs  on  the  right-hand  side. 

This  gives  the  series 

J  a  w=2         ■'  a  J  a 

...Ik  (^rn-i,  ^m)f(^m)  d^m  -  "  d^i  +  ■  -  •  ■ 

J  a 

Since  \K(x,  y) \  and  \f{x)\  are  bounded,  let  their  upper  bounds  be  M,  M'. 
Then  the  modulus  of  the  general  term  of  the  series  does  not  exceed 

\X\mM'''M'{h-ay. 
The  series  for  8  {x)  therefore  converges  uniformly  when 

\\\<M-^{h-  a)-i ; 

and,  by  actual  substitution,  it  satisfies  the  integral  equation. 

If  K{x,  y)=0  when  y'> x^  we  find   by  induction  that  the   modulus  of  the  general 
term  in  the  series  for  S{x)  does  not  exceed 

I X '^M'^M' {x-af\{in !)< |  X  j™ Jlf^i^' (6 - aY'lmK, 

and  so  the  series  converges  uniformly  for  all  values  of  X  ;  and  we  iefer  that  in  this  case 
Fredholm's  solution  is  an  integral  function  of  X. 

It  is  obvious  from  the  form  of  the  solution  that  when  |  A- 1  <  M~^  (b  —  a)~\ 
the  reciprocal  function  k(x,  ^ ;  X)  may  be  written  in  the  form 

k(x,^;X)  =  -K(x,^)-  t  X— ^  rK(x,  |,)  fV(|„  ^,) 

TO  =  2  J  a  J  a 

...  i    K  {^rn-i ,  I)  d^m-i  d^,n-2  ...d^„ 
J  a 

for  with  this  definition  of  k  (x,  ^ ;  X),  we  see  that 

S{x)=f(x)-\fk(x,^;  X)f{^)dl 

J  a 

so  that  k{x,  ^;  X)  is  a  reciprocal  function,  and  by  §  11-22  there  is  only  one 
reciprocal  function. 

Write 

K  (X,  I)  =  K,  (x,  ^),      ['k^x,  r)  Kn  (f ',  I)  ^r  -  ^n+x  (^,  ^), 

■'  a 

and  then  we  have 

-k{x,^;X)=t  X'^K^^+M^), 


m=0 


while  f  V„,  (x,  r )  Kn  (r,  f )  d^' = K,,+n  (^  n 

J  a 

as  may  be  seen  at  once  on  writing  each  side  as  an  (m  +  n  -  l)-tuple  integral. 
The  functions  K,r,  (x,  f )  are  called  iterated  functions. 


11-5,  11-51]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  217 

11'5.     Symmetric  nuclei. 

Let  K^  {x,  y)  =  Ki  (y,  x) ;  then  the  nucleus  K  (x,  y)  is  said  to  be  symmetric. 

The  iterated  functions  of  such  a  nucleus  are  also  symmetric,  i.e. 
Kn{x,  y)=  Kniy,  x)  for  all  values  of  n;  for,  if  Kn{x,  y)  is  symmetric,  then 

Kn^,  {X,  y)  =  f V, {x,  I)  Kn  {I  y)  d^  =  f  V, (I,  x)  K^{y,  f) d^ 

J  a  J  a 

=  f  Kn  (y,  ^)  K,  (l  x)  d^  =  Kn^,  {y,  x), 

J  a 

and  the  required  result  follows  by  induction. 

Also,  none  of  the  iterated  functions  are  identically  zero ;  for,  if  possible,  let 
Kp  (x,  3/)  =  0 ;  let  ?i  be  chosen  so  that  2"~^  <  jo  ^  2",  and,  since  Kp  (x,  y)  =  0,  it 
follows  that  K^  (x,  y)  =  0,  from  the  recurrence  formula. 

But  then        0  =  Kqu  {x,  x)  =  I    K^n-i  (x,  f)  K^n-i  (^,  x)  d^ 

J  a 

==l\K,n-x{x,^)Ydl 

J  a 

and  so  K^-i{x,  ^)  =  0;  carrying  on  this  argument,  we  get  ultimately  that 
K^  (x,  y)  =  0,  and  the  integral  equation  is  trivial. 

11"51.  Schmidt's*  theorem.  If  the  nucleus  is  symmetric,  the  equation 
B  (A,)  =  0  has  at  least  one  root. 

To  prove  this  theorem,  let 

Un=  \     Kn  {X,  x)  dx, 

SO  that,  when  |  A,  |  <  i¥~^  (6  —  a)~S  we  have,  by  §  11-21  example  2  and  §  11-4, 

D{\)     dX        n=i     ""        • 
Now  since         I    I    {fxKn+i  (x,  ^)  +  Kn-i  (x,  ^)Y'  d^dx  ^  0 

J  a  J  a 

for  all  real  values  of  fi,  we  have 

A*"    ^211+2    I     ^f^  ^271  ">"    '-^ 2n—2  ^  "> 
and   so  t^2n+2  ^Zn—2  ^    ^271  )  ^2W— 2  -^  ^• 

Therefore  U.^,  17^,  ...  are  all  positive,  and  if  V'JU'2  =  v,  it  follows,  by  in- 
duction from  the  inequality  U^n+oU^n-^^  U^n,  that  11271+2/ U'271  ^  ^"'• 

00 
Therefore  when  |  X^  |  ^  v~^,  the  terms  of  "Z   ?7,iX"~^  do  not  tend  to  zero ; 

w  =  l 

and  so,  by  §  5-4,  the  function  yr—--    ^~~  has  a  singularity  inside  or  on  the 

*  The  proof  given  is  due  to  Kneser,  Palermo  liendiconti,  xxii. 


218  THE    PROCESSES   OF    ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

circle  \\\  =  v~^;  but  since  D  (\)  is  an  integral  function,  the  only  possible 
singularities  of  7^  r  t  -7        are  at  zeros  of  D  (X) ;  therefore  D  (X)  has  a  zero 

inside  or  on  the  circle  \\\  =  v~'^. 

[Note.  By  §  11 '21,  D  (X)  is  either  an  integral  function  or  else  a  mere  polynomial ;  in 
tbe  latter  case,  it  has  a  zero  by  §  6'31  example  1  ;  the  point  of  the  theorem  is  that  in 
the  former  case  D  (X)  cannot  be  such  a  function  as  e^\  which  has  no  zeros.] 

11"6.     Orthogonal  functions. 

The  real  continuous  functions  ^1  (x),  (fj^  (x),  . . .  are  said  to  be  orthogonal 
and  normal*  for  the  range  (a,  b)  if 

j    (f>,„(a;)(f)n{x)dx  (=0         (m^n), 

{—  1         (ni  =  n). 

If  we  are  given  n  real  continuous  linearly  independent  functions 
Ui  (x),  U2 {x),  ...  Un (x),  we  can  form  n  linear  combinations  of  them  which 
are  orthogonal. 

For  suppose  we  can  construct  m  —  1  orthogonal  functions  (/>i, ...  <^,„_i  such 
that  </)p  is  a  linear  combination  of  u^,  u^,  ...  tip  (where  p  =  l,  2,  ...  m—  1); 
we  shall  now  shew  how  to  construct  the  function  (f>m  such  that  (f>i,  ^o.  •••  (f>m 
are  all  normal  and  orthogonal. 

Let  ,4>,n  (x)  =  Ci^m  <^l  (^)  +  C2, m  (^2  (^)  +  . . .  +  C„i_.i (^„^_i  (x)  +  W,„  {x), 

SO  that  i(^,rt  is  a  function  of  u^,  u^,  ...  Um,. 
Then,  multiplying  by  <^p  and  integrating, 

I      10m  (^)  0^  (^)  dx  =  Cp^  ,n  +  I      Um  (x)  (f)p  (x)  dx  (p  <  Vl). 

J  a  .'a 

Hence  I    j^^^  (x)  (f)p  (x)  dx  =  0 

J  a 
if  Cp^  m  =  —   I      U,-n  {x)  <f)p  (x)  dx  ] 


a  function  ^^„^  {x),  orthogonal  to  0i  (.r),  ^.^  {x),  . . .  0„,_i  (x),  is  therefore  con- 
structed. 

Now  choose  a  so  that      a-  I    {i0,„  (x)]'^dx=  1 ; 

and  take  (^„, (x)  =  a. i0,„  (x). 

Then  /    </>„,  (x)  (f)p  (x)  dx  (=0      (p<  m), 

J  a  J 

[=1      (p  =  m). 

We  can  thus  obtain  the  functions  0,,  ^o,  ...  in  order. 

*  They  are  said  to  be  orthogonal  if  the  first  equation  only  is  satisfied  ;  the  systematic  study 
of  such  functions  is  due  to  Murphy,  Camh.  Phil.  Trans.,  Vols.  iv.  and  v. 


ire,  11-61]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  219 

The  members  of  a  finite  set  of  orthogonal  functions  are  linearly  inde- 
pendent.    For  if 

ai</>i  (^0  +  «202  (a;)+  ...+  an<f>n  (x)  =  0, 
we  should  get,  on  multiplying  by  <f>p(x)  and  integrating,  a^,  =  0 ;  therefore  all 
the  coefficients  Op  vanish  and  the  relation  is  nugatory. 

It  is  obvious  that  tt  ~  ^  cos  mx,  ir~^  sin  mx  form  a  set  of  normal  orthogonal  functions 
for  the  range  ( -  tt,  it). 

Example  1.     From  the  functions  1,  x,  x\...  construct  the  following  set  of  functions 
which  are  orthogonal  (but  not  normal)  for  the  range  -  1,  1  : 

1,  .r,  *2_^,    ^_a^,   ^_^^2  +  ^^.... 

Example  2.     From  the  functions  1,  x,  x^,  ...  construct  a  set  of  functions 
which  are  orthogonal  (but  not  normal)  for  the  range  a,  b  ;  where 

[A  similar  investigation  is  given  in  §  15-14.] 

11'61.     The  connexion  of  orthogonal  functions  with  homogeneous  integral 
equations. 

Consider  the  homogeneous  equation 

4>{x)  =  \A'<l>{^)K{x,^)dl 

J  a 

where  \q  is  a  real  *  characteristic  number  for  K  (x,  f ) ;  we  have  already  seen 
how  to  construct  solutions  of  the  equation  ;  let  n  linearly  independent  solutions 
be  taken  and  construct  from  them  n  orthogonal  functions  ^i,  (f).2, ...  ^n- 

Then  since  the  functions  <^^  are  orthogonal 

J  a    [_m  =  l  J  a  J  7n  =  \J  a  \_  J  a 

and  it  is  easily  seen  that  the  expression  on  the  right  may  be  written  in  the 
form 

'b 


1  =  1     (J  a 


on  performing  the  integration  with  regard  to  y ;  and  this  is  the  same  as 
t    \'k{x,  y)<f>,n(y)dy  J'k(x,  B^.n{^)dl 

w=l  -a  .  n 

Therefore  if  we  write  K  for  K  (.r,  y)  and  A  for 

n  rb    ' 

%  cf>,„(y)       K{x,^)c^,„{^)dl 


'b 

4>.a  (y)  I 

m=l 
It  will  be  seen  immediately  that  the  characteristic  numbers  of  a  symmetric  nucleus  are  all 


real. 


220  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

we  have  I    A?dy=\    KAdy, 

J  a  J  a 

and  so  [  A'dy=  I  K^-dy  -  (  (K  -  Afdy. 

Therefore 

rb  (    n  p  rb 

I    <  t  \(l>m(y)(f>m(x)\  dy^      [K{x,y)Ydy, 

n  rb 

and  SO  Xo  S   {(f>m(x)Y^      [K{x,  y)Ydy. 

7ft=l  J  a 

Integrating,  we  get 

n^Xo-'  \    I  {K{x,y)Ydydx. 

J  a  J  a 

This  formula  gives  an  upper  limit  to  the  number,  n,  of  orthogonal  functions 
corresponding  to  any  characteristic  number  \q. 

These  n  orthogonal  functions  are  called  characteristic  functiofis  (or  auto- 
f unctions)  corresponding  to  X,,. 

Now  let  ^'''*  {x),  ^<i'  {x)  be  characteristic  functions  corresponding  to 
different  characteristic  numbers  X^,  Xj. 

Then  </)(«>  {x)  <^(i'  {x)  =\A    K {x,  |)  (/><»>  {x)  <^(i>  (^) d^, 

J  a 

and  so 

[  <f>^'>^(x)(f>^'^(x)dx  =  \r  I  K(x,^)cf>^o^(x)<f>^'^{^)d^dx (1), 

J  a  J  a  J  a 

and  similarly 

[  (^(«)  (x)  (/)»'  (x)  dx  =  \J    (  K(x,  ^)  <^'»)  {^)  </)W  (x)  d^dx 

=  \  f  rK(^,x)4>i^^{x)<f>^H^)dxd^ (2), 

on  interchanging  x  and  ^. 

We  infer  from  (1)  and  (2)  that  if  \  =^  X^  and  if  K(x,  |)  =  K(^,  x), 

(f>^°^(x)(f>^'^{x)dx  =  0, 

J  a 

and  so  the  functions  ^c*  (x),  0<i'  (x)  are  mutually  orthogonal. 

If  therefore  the  nucleus  he  symmetric  and  if  corresponding  to  each 
characteristic  number  we  construct  the  complete  system  of  orthogonal 
functions,  all  the  functions  so  obtained- will  be  orthogonal. 

Further,  if  the  nucleus  be  symmetric  all  the  characteristic  numbers  are 
i-eal ;  for  if  Xy,  Xi  be  conjugate  complex  roots  and  if*  u„  (x)  =  v  (x)  +  iw  (x)  be 

*  V  {x)  and  w  (x)  beiog  real. 


117]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  221 

a  solution  for  the  characteristic  number  Xo,  then  u^  (x)  =  v  (x)  —  iw  (x)  is 
a  solution  for  the  characteristic  number  \ ;  replacing  0'"'  (x),  ^"'  (x)  in  the 
equation 

0«'>(a;)</>("(a!)rfa;  =  O 


J  a 


by  V  (x)  +  iw  {x),  v  (x)  —  iw  {x),  (which  is  obviously  permissible),  we  get 

[[v{x)Y-^{w{x)Y\dx=^0, 


which  implies  v{x)  =  w  {x)  =  0,  so  that  the  integral  equation  has  no  solution 
except  zero  corresponding  to  the  characteristic  numbers  Xo,  Xj ;  this  is 
contrary  to  §  11*23;  hence,  if  the  nucleus  be  symmetric,  the  characteristic 
numbers  are  real. 

11"7.     The  development*  of  a  symmetric  nucleus. 

Let  ^1  {x\  <f>2 (x),  ^3 (x),  ...  be  a  complete  set  of  orthogonal  functions 
satisfying  the  homogeneous  integral  equation  with  symmetric  nucleus 

4>(x)^xfK(x,^)cf>{^)d^, 

J  a 

the  corresponding  characteristic  numbers  being f  Xj,  Xg,  X3,  .... 

°°    d>  (x^  (b  (v) 
Now  supposel  that    the  series  S  rrn\yj  ^^   uniformly  convergent 

when  a  ^x  ■^b,  a%  y  ^b.     Then  it  will  be  shewn  that 

K(x,y)^t^'^^^l 

n=l  f^n 

For  consider  the  symmetric  nucleus 

<i>n  i^)  <i>n  (y) 


H{x,y)  =  K{x,y)-  t 


X~ 


If  this  nucleus  is  not  identically  zero,  it  will  possess  (§  11  "51)  at  least  one 
characteristic  number  /j,. 

Let  -^  (x)  be  any  solution  of  the  equation 

^lr{x)^f.l'H{x,^)ir(^)d^, 

■1  a 

which  does  not  vanish  identically. 

Multiply  by  0,i  {x)  and  integrate  and  we  get 

f  V  (^)  c/>n  {x)  dx  =  t.\'  f  \k  {x,  B  -  i  ^^i-l^H  ^  (^)  <^,  (.r)  dxd^ ; 

•  a  J  a  ■  a    [  n  =  l  ^n  I 

*  This  investigation  is  due  to  Schmidt,  the  result  to  Hilbert. 

t  These  numbers  are  not  all  different  if  there  is  more  than  one  orthogonal  function  to  each 
characteristic  number. 

:J:  The  supposition  is,  of  course,  a  matter  for  verification  with  any  particular  equation. 


222  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

since  the  series  converges  uniformly,  we  may  integrate  term  by  term  and  get 
f  V  {x)  <^n  (^)  dx  =  ^  f  V  (^)  </>-  (^)  d^-^I^M^)^  (B  d^ 

J  a,  '^w  J  a  '^n  J  a 

=  0. 
Therefore    yfr  (x)   is  orthogonal   to  <^i  (x),   (f)^  (x),  . . . ;    and    so  taking   the 
equation 

J  a  [  n=l  '^n  J 

we  have  ^fr{x)  =  /J^,|   K  (x,  ^)  yjr  (^)  d^. 

J  a 

Therefore  //-  is  a  characteristic  number  of  K  (x,  y),  and  so  t/t  {x)  must  be 
a  linear  combination  of  the  (finite  number  of)  functions  </>«(;»)  corresponding 
to  this  number ;  let 

■s^{x)  =  ^a^<^rn{sc). 
m 

Multiply  by  ^^  {^)  ^'^d  integrate ;  then  since  i/r  (x)  is  orthogonal  to  all  the 
functions  0„  {x),  we  see  that  a„^  =  0,  so,  contrary  to  hypothesis,  -»/r  {x)  =  0. 

The  contradiction  implies  that  the  nucleus  H  {x,  y)  must  be  identically 
zero ;  that  is  to  say,  K  {x,  y)  can  be  expanded  in  the  given  series,  if  it 
is  uniformly  convergent. 

Example.     Shew  that,  if  \  be  a  characteristic  number,  the  equation 

0  {x)  =/  {x)  +  Xo  \"  K  {X,  I)  (/>  (^)  di 

J  a 

certainly  has  no  solution  unless  f{x)  is  orthogonal  to  all  the  characteristic  functions 
corresponding  to  Xq. 

11  71.     The  solution  of  Fredholms  equation  by  a  series. 
Retaining  the  notation  of  §  11 '7,  consider  the  integral  equation 

^  (x)  =f{x)  +  \['k(x,^)cP  (I)  d^, 

■J  a 

where  K  (x,  |)  is  symmetric. 

If  we  assume  that  <t*(|)  can  be  expanded  into  a  uniformly  convergent 

00 

series    X  «n</>n(f)>  we  have 

n  =  l 

:£  an  <^„(.x)  =/(*:)+    S    r-an<^«  («-■)> 
M=l  »=1  ^n 

SO  that/(A')  can  be  expanded  in  the  series 

S   an    ~ (pn  (^)- 

ij  =  1  /^n 

Hence  if  the  function  f(x)    can  be  expanded  into  the  convergent  series 
<»  ^     b  X 

S  bn<pni^),   then    the    series    S  :.  *'   \  <l>n  (■^^')>  if  '^^    converges  uniformly  in 

71  =  1  M  =  l  X,,j  A/ 

the  7'ange  (a,  b),  is  the  solution  of  Fredhohn's  equation. 


11-71-11-81]  INTEGRAL   EQUATIONS  223 

ao 

To  determine  the  coefficients  6„  we  observe  that  ^  6„^„  {x)  converges  uni- 
formly  by  §  3"35* ;  then,  multiplying  by  0„  {x)  and  integrating,  we  get 

K=\   4>n  {x)f{x)  dx. 

J  a 
11  "S.     Solution,  of  AbePs  integral  equation. 
This  equation  is  of  the  form 

/(^)=r/''-%^^  (0</x<l,     a^x^b), 

where/'  (x)  is  continuous  and/(a)  =  0;  we  proceed  to  find  a  continuous  solution  u  (x). 

Let  0  (^)  =  I   11  ii)  d^i  and  take  the  formula  t 

TT       _  p  dx 

sin  (/iijr)  ~  J  ((z-  ^)i-M  (x  - 1)*^ ' 

multiply  by  u{^)  and  integrate,  and  we  get,  on  using  Dirichlet's  formula  (§  4-51  corollary), 

-4-^  {<!>  {z)  -  ^  («)} = r  d^  r  — ^#^^ 

= {'dx  r   ^^^^)^^ 

J  a        J  a{z-x)'^-f^{x-^Y 

^f'^  f{x)dx_ 

J  a{z-xY-l^' 

Since  the  original  expression  has  a  continuous  derivate,  so  has  the  final  one ;  therefore  the 
continuous  solution,  if  it  exist,  can  be  none  other  than 

and  it  can  be  verified  by  substitution  J  that  this  function  actually  is  a  solution. 

11  "SI.     Schlomilch's^  integral  equation. 

Let f{x)  have  a  continuous  differential  coefficient  when  —tt^x^tt.     Then  the  equation 

2    Ti"- 
fix)  =-         ^{xsva.6)de 
'^  J  0 

has  one  solution  with  a  continuous  differential  coefficient  when  —  tt^^^tt,  namely 

fin 

cf)  (x)  =^f{0)+x        f  (x  sin  d)  d6. 


From  §  4'2  it  follows  that 

2  A'^ 

/'  (.r)  =  -  "    sin  (90'  {x  sin  6)  d6 

■a  I  n 


(so  that  we  have  0  (0)=/(0),  0'  (0)  =  ^7r/  (0)). 

*  Since  the  numbers  X„  are  all  real  we  may  arrange  them  in  two  sets,  one  negative  the 
other  positive,  the  members  in  each  set  being  in  order  of  magnitude  ;  then,  when  [  X„  |  ^  \,  it  is 
evident  that  X„/(X„-  X)  is  a  monotonic  sequence  in  the  case  of  either  set. 

t  This  follows  from  §  6-'2-4  example  1,  by  writing  (z  -  x)j{x  -  f)  in  place  of  x. 

X  For  the  details  we  refer  to  Bocher's  tract. 

§  Zeitschrift  filr  Math.  ii.  (1857).  The  reader  will  easily  see  that  this  is  reducible  to  a  ease 
of  Volterra's  equation  with  a  discontinuous  nucleus. 


224  THE   PROCESSES   OF   ANALYSIS  [CHAP.  XI 

Write  X  sin  ^  for  x^  and  we  have  on  multiplying  by  x  and  integrating 

{\t  2x  /"i'r  r  Att  ■) 

xl     f  (xsin-^)  d-^= —  /      ij      sin  ^0  (x sm  $  am  xJa)  dd^  d^)r. 

Change  the  order  of  integration  in  the  repeated  integral  (§  4"3)  and  take  a  new  variable  x 
in  place  of  yjf,  defined  by  the  equation  sin  _;(^  =  sin  ^  sin  ■^. 

fi^  „  ,      •     ,  ^   7 ,      2.r  fh-^  (  p  d)'  (x  sin  y)  cos  v  dv]    , . 

Then  xj^  fixs.n^)d^=-j^    |j/-   "^^  I '^^^ 

Changing  the  order  of  integration  again  (§  4-51), 

/"^'"r//      ■     i\^i      2^  f*^  f  Z"*'^  ^' (-'^  sin  x)  cos  X  sin  ^     1 
X        f  {X  sin  V^)  d^^r=  —         ]  ^^'      _A=. —  d6\  dx. 

fi^        aindde            f            .    /cos^Nli'^     , 
But  I        ,  --=     —arc  sin    =2'^, 

Jx    \/c082;^-C0s''i^        L  \COS  X/ J  X 

fin  fin 

and  so  *  I     /'  i^  sin  yj/)  d^  =  x  j      cf)'  {x  sin  x)  cos  x^x 

=  cl>{x)-cf>{0). 
Since  0(O)=/(O),  we  must  have 

0  (.r)  =  f{0)  +  x  j^f  {X  sin  V.)  df  ■ 
J  0 

and  it  can  be  verified  by  substitution  that  this  function  actually  is  a  solution. 


REFERENCES. 

H.  Bateman,  Report  to  the  British  Association*,  1910. 

M.  BocHER,  Introduction  to  Integral  Equations  (Cambridge  Math.  Tracts,  No.  10). 

H.  B.  Heywood  et  M.  Fr^chet,  L' Equation  de  Fredholm. 

V.  VoLTERRA,  Lecons  sur  les  equations  integrates  et  les  eqvations  integro-differentielles 
(Borel  Tracts). 

T.  Lalesco,  Introduction  a  la  theorie  des  eqiiatioas  integrates. 

I.  Fredholm,  Acta  Mathematica,  xxvii.  pp.  365-390. 

D.  HiLBERT,  Grundzuge  einer  allgemeinen   Theorie   der   linearen  Integralgleichungen 
(Leipzig,  1912). 

E.  Schmidt,  Math.  Annalen,  Lxiii.  pp.  433-476. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that  if  the  time  of  descent  of  a  particle  down  a  smooth  curve  to  its  lowest 
})oint  is  independent  of  the  starting  point  (the  particle  starting  from  rest)  the  curve  is  a 
cycloid.  (Abel.) 

*  The  reader  will  find  a  more  complete  bibliography  in  this  Eeport  than  it  is  possible  to  give 
here. 


INTEGRAL  EQUATIONS  226 

2.  Shew  that,  if/(^)  is  continuous,  the  solution  of 

(f)  (x)  =/  (^)  +  X  I    cos  (2x8)  (f)  («)  ds 
Jo 

f{x)  +  \  I     /  («)  cos  (2X8)  cU 

''  *« i^TA^ • 

assuming  the  legitimacy  of  a  certain  change  of  order  of  integration. 

3.  Shew  that  the  Weber-Hermite  functions 

satisfy  <f)ix)=\  j       e**'*^  <^  (s)  ds 

for  the  characteristic  values  of  X.  (A,  Milne.) 


4.     Shew  that  periodic  solutions  (with  period  27r)  of  the  differential  equation 
satisfy  the  integral  equation 


^^)  +  (a2  +  peos2.^)0(^)  =  O 


0  {.v)  =  X  P^e^  °°^  x  cos  8  ^  ^^^  ^^       (Whittaker ;  see  §  19-21.) 
J  0 

6.     Shew  that  the  characteristic  functions  of  the  equation 

</) (a;)  =  X  /^^  j-TT-i  (^-y)2- -  |a;- y  ||  0  (^)  o?y 

are  ^  (x)  —  cos  mx,    sin  mx, 

where  X  =  m  ~  ^  and  m.  is  any  integer. 

6.  Shew  that  <t>  {^')=  j''  f~^ (l>{i)  d^ 

has  the  discontinuous  solution  (f)  {x)  =  kx^~'^.  (Bocher.) 

7.  Shew  that  a  solution  of  the  integral  equation  with  a  symmetric  nucleus 

f{x)=f"K{x,^)(l,{$)di 

J  a 
is  ^{^)=    2    an\n<i>n{^)i 

provided  that   this   series  converges  uniformly,  wliere  Xn,  <^b  (*')  are  the   characteristic 
numbers  and  functions  of  K{x,  ^)  and  2  «„^,i  (^)  is  the  expansion  off{x). 

8.  Shew  that,  if  |  A  |  <  1,  the  characteristic  functions  of  the  equation 


'^  ^^^  =  2^  jo    1 -2A  cos  (^--^y+A^'^  (^^  ^^ 


are  1,  cos  7nx,  sin  nix,  the  corresponding  characteristic   numbers  being  1,  A'",  A'";  where 
m  takes  all  positive  integral  values. 


W.  M.  A.  15 


PAKT  II 

THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS 


15- 


CHAPTER  XII 

THE   GAMMA  FUNCTION 

12"1.     Definitions  of  the  Gamma-function.     The   Weierstrassian  product. 
Historically,  the  Gamma-function*  V{z)  was  first  defined  by  Euler  as  the 

infinite  integral  I    t^~^e~*dt]  but  in  developing  the  theory  of  the  function,  it 

Jo 

is  more  convenient  to  define  it  by  means  of  an  infinite  product. 
Consider  the  product     ze"^^  n|n+-jenl 

where  7=  lim  i-+7^+...+ log  ml  =  0-5772157.... 

[The  constant  y  is  known  as  Euler's  or   Mascheroni's  constant ;   to  prove  that  it 
exists  we  observe  that,  if 

w,,  =  I     — -, c  dt  =  —  Ioq; , 

Jo  n{n  +  t)         n        °    n    ' 

/^  dt      1  °^ 

„  =  -5  ;  therefore  2  u,^  converges,  and 
0  ^       '^"  ji=i 

hm   \-  +  -+...-\r--\ogm\=   hm    \  2  u,Mog—-\=  2  u„. 

The  value  of  y  has  been  calculated  by  J.  C.  Adams  to  260  places  of  decimals.] 

The  product  under  consideration  represents  an  analytic  function  of  z,  for 
all  values  of  z ;  for  if  N  be  an  integer  such  that  |  z  j  ^^N,  we  havef,  if  n  >  N, 

liogfiH-l--  = 

!        \        nj      n 


= 

Xz"      Iz' 
2n^'^Sn^      '" 

\zf\^       \z\      \z'\           "1 

] 

INU,       1      1 
tlz^r  +  2  +  2~^  + 

)      IN"- 

■••\^2n' 

*  The  notation  T  {z)  was  introduced  by  Legendre  in  1814. 
t  Taking  the  principal  value  of  log  (l  +  zjn). 


230  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

00 

Since  the  series     S     {N^/{2n^)]  converges,  it  follows  that,  when  |  ^  |  ^  JiV, 

n=N+l 

%     •|log(l+-) \  is   an   absolutely  and   uniformly  convergent   series 

of  analytic    functions,   and    so   it    is   an    analytic   function   (§   5"3) ;    con- 
sequently its  exponential      11     -^(1  +-)e     «[  is  an  analytic  function,  and 

so  zey^   U.  \(l  +  -]  e    "i  is  an  analytic  function  when  \2;\  ^^N,  w^here  N  is 
any  integer ;  that  is  to  say,  the  product  is  analytic  for  all  finite  values  of  z. 
The  Gamma-function  was  defined  by  Weierstrass*  by  the  equation 

^  =  2ey^U  \(l  +  -)e~TX; 
r(^;)  „=i  [V        nJ         j 

from  this  equation  it  is  apparent  that  V  (z)  is  analytic  except  at  the  points 
2  =  0,  —1,  —2,  ...,  luhere  it  has  simple  poles. 

Proofs  have  been  published  by  Holder +,  Moore  J,  and  Barnes  §  of  a  theorem  known  to 
Weierstrass  that  the  Gamma-function  does  not  satisfy  any  differential  equation  with 
rational  coefficients. 

•  Example  1.     Prove  that 

r(i)=i,    r'(i)=-y, 

where  y  is  Euler's  constant. 

[Justify  differentiating  logarithmically  the  equation 

r4:)='-«'i{('+s)«'"} 

by  §  4"7,  and  put  z  =  \  after  the  diflPerentiations  have  been  performed.] 

•  Example  2.     Shew  that 

,11  I  r    l-(l-0"      7 

and  hence  that  Euler's  constant  y  is  given  by|| 


lim 

«-*-00 


[/:{-(-mT'-/:(-,o"T'] 


Example  3.     Shew  that 

e>^r(s  +  l 


>.=ilV       --  +  »A    ]~T{z-x+\y 

*  Crelle,  li.  (1856).     This  formula  for  T  (z)  had  been  obtained  from  Euler's  formula  (§  12-11) 
in  1848  by  F.  W.  Newman,  Cambridge  and  Dublin  Journal,  iii. 
t  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  xxviii.  p.  1. 
X  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  xlviii.  p.  49. 
§  Messenger  of  Mathematics,  Vol.  xxix.  p.  64. 
li  The  reader  will  see  later  (§  12-2  example  4)  that  this  limit  may  be  written 

Wl-e-^)''-"       ^"^"^^^ 


1211,  1212]  THE  GAMMA   FUNCTION 

12*11.     Euler's  formula  for  the  Gamma-function. 
By  the  definition  of  an  infinite  product  we  have 


231 


^{^) 


lim  e 


1  [lim  n  |fl4--V"[ 

~    [1 +-  +  ...  + \ogm]z   m    [f  z\      ~  Z.Y 

=  z\im     eV      2  m  7    n    (l  +  -)e    " 


=  z  lim 


=  z  lim 

m-*-w 

=  ^:  lim 

>»-*30 

m-^  n    1  +  - 

n=l  V  W 


n  f  1  +  -)    n  ( 1  +  ^ 

n=l\  W/      n=lV  '^^ 


Hence 


«=i  (V        n]\        nj    ]\        ml  y 


Zn=\\\        n)    \        n 


This  formula  is  due  to  Euler* ;  it  is  valid  except  when  2  =  0,  —  1,  —  2, ... , 
Example.     Prove  that 


,,       ,.  1.2...(»-1) 

r  (Z)  =     lim     —, -r ) ^-— T  '. 


(Euler.) 


12*12.     The  difference  equation  satisfied  hy  the  Gamma-function. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  the  function  V  {z)  satisfies  the  difference  equation 

T{z  +  l)  =  zV{z). 
For,  by  Euler's  formula,  if  z  is  not  a  negative  integer, 


r(^+i)/r(^)  = 


z+l 


lim  n 


(-ri 

-=- 

n 

1 + ^y 

Z  jre-*.3c  n=l     1     I    "^ 


Hm    U  y. ^ .— r 

1  w^x  M=i  I      2  +  n  +  1      ) 


1 .               771+1 
=  z  lim    7  =  2^. 

m^co  2;  +  m  +  1 

This  is  one  of  the  most  important  properties  of  the  Gamma-function. 

Since  F  (1)  =  1,  it  follows  that,  if  ^  is  a  positive  integer,  F  (^)  =  (2;  -  1) !. 

*  It  was  given  in  1729  in  a  letter  to  Goldbach,  printed  in  Fuss'  Corresp.  Math.    It  was 
deduced  by  Euler  from  his  definition  of  V  (2)  as  an  infinite  integral.     See  §  12-2. 


232  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

Example.     Prove  that 

1  ,  1  ,  1  ,         =_A./1       1J_4.1J__       1 

V{z->r\yv{z^^yV{z^'Sy"'     V{z)\z~  \\z-^\^^\z-\-^     '"]• 

[Consider  the  expression 

111  1 


Z        3(2+1)        2(3+1)  (0  +  2)  2  (0+1)...  (2 +  m)" 

It  can  be  expressed  in  partial  fractions  in  the  form  2    • — ~  ,  where 

n=0   S  +  'i- 

^i!      i        1!       2!  (m-»)!j  )l  !      ^        r=m-n+l»"U 

°°         1                e                                    "'-(  —  )"     1      r       =^'         1  "I 
Noting  that       2        —,< , r-r^.,  prove   that   2  -^ — '- \       2        — tV^O  as 

j-=m-7i+l»'!       (m-%  +  1)!  n=0     »i!     2  +  'i    lr=«i-H+l  '' U 

m  ^-  00  when  2  is  not  a  negative  integer.] 

12*13.     The  evaluation  of  a  general  class  of  infinite  products. 

By  means  of  the  Gamma-function,  it  is  possible  to  evaluate  the  general 

class  of  infinite  products  of  the  form 

00 

n  Un, 

M  =  l 

where  Un  is  any  rational  function  of  the  index  n. 

For,  resolving  Un  into  its  factors,  we  can  write  the  product  in  the  form 

1^  {A  (n -a^{n-ao^  ...{n-  a^)] 
«=i|  {n-h;}...{n-hi) 

and  it  is  supposed  that  no  factor  in  the  denominator  vanishes. 

In  order  that  this  product  may  converge,  the  number  of  factors  in  the 
numerator  must  clearly  be  the  same  as  the  number  of  factors  in  the 
denominator,  and  also  A=l\  for,  otherwise,  the  general  factor  of  the  product 
would  not  tend  to  the  value  unity  as  n  tends  to  infinity. 

We  have  therefore  k  =  l,  and,  denoting  the  product  by  P,  we  may  write 


1=1  \{n-\)...{n-hk)]  ' 
The  general  term  in  this  product  can  be  written 

(-t)-(-?)(-r-(-r 

_  -,  _  ai  +  g,  +  . . .  +  gfc  -  61  -  . .  ■  -  ?)fc  , 
n 
where  A^  is  0  {n~^)  when  n  is  large. 

In  order  that  the  infinite  product  may  be  absolutely  convergent,  it  is 
therefore  necessary  further  (§  2*7)  that 

tti  +  .  .  .  +  ttfc  —  61  -    .  .  .    -  6/;  =  0. 


12-13,  12-14]  THE   GAMMA  FUNCTION  233 

We  can  therefore  introduce  the  factor 

exp  {nr^{ai  +  ...  +  ajc  —  hi—  ...  —  hk)] 

into  the  general  factor  of  the  product,  without  altering  its  value ;  and  thus 
we  have 


p=  n  \ 


(l_|^)e"(l-^)6«...(l-^)e" 


['-W'-i'-iY 


But   it  is  obvious   from  the  Weierstrassian  definition  of  the  Gamma- 
function  that 

z 

1 


and  so 


n 
p  = 


^      n)^]      -zV{-z)e-y''' 


a^V{-(h)-..(ii,r{-aic) 


a  formula  which  expresses  the  general  infinite  product  P  in  terms  of  the 
Gamma-function. 


Example  1.     Prove  that 


n 


«(a-|-6  +  s)       r(a  +  l)r(6  +  l) 


8=1  {a  +  s){b  +  s)  r(a  +  6  +  l)     ' 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  if  a  =  cos  {'injn)  +  i  sin  {2ir/n),  then 

^(l-^)(^i-|„y..  =  {-r(-^-)r(-a^^)...r(-a»-i^^)}-«. 

12-14.     Connexion  between  the  Gamma-function  and  the  circular  functions. 

We  now  proceed  to  establish  another  most  important  property  of  the 
Gamma-function,  expressed  by  the  equation 


sm7r2 
We  have,  by  the  definition  of  Weierstrass  (§  12-1), 

2 
1 


T(.)T(-.)^-^^Uj[l^lU 


n 


I-",.- 


Z  Sm  TTZ 


by  §  7*5  example  1.     Since,  by  §  12-12, 

T{l-z)  =  -zV{-z) 
we  have  the  result  stated. 


234  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

Corollary  1.     If  we  assign  to  z  the  value  ^,  this  formula  gives  {r(J)}2  =  7r  ;  since,  by 
the  formula  of  Weierstrass,  r  (|)  is  positive,  we  have 

r(i)  =  7ri 
Corollary  2.     If  ^  {z)  =T'{z)lT (z),  then  yjr  {I  —  z)  -  -^  {z)  =  tt  cot  ttz. 

12*15.     The  multiplication-theorem  of  Oauss*  and  Legendre. 
We  shall  next  obtain  the  result 

r(.)r(.  + 1)  r  (.  +  ?)...  r  (.  +  ^)  =  (2.)*("-^)n^-rM. 

Jb  or  let  6  (2)  = nr — ^ • 

^  ^  '^  nl  {nz) 

Then  we  have,  by  Euler's  formula  (§12'11  example), 

^-^  ,.  1.2  ...  (m  -  1) .  m^+'""» 

w^^  n    hm  ^  ^ 


^^^^  , .  1.2...  (n^n  -  1) .  (mnY^ 

n  lim 


??2;(w2'+  1) ...  (nz+  nm  —  1) 
j(?n  — 1)!|  m       ^         'n 


^^^  {nm-l)\{nm) 


=  lim 


|(m  —  1)  !|  Tn^^       'n 


m-^oo  (nw-l)! 

It  is  evident  from  this  last  equation  that  </)  (z)  is  independent  of  z. 
Thus  ^ (2^)  is  equal  to  the  value  which  it  has  when  z=  -;  and  so 

Therefore  (^  ^^  =  n;  {  F  Q  F  (l  -  ^-)} 


.     TT    .     27r  .    (?^— l)7r 

sm  —  sm  —  ...  sm 


n  n  n 

Thus,  since  <^  (w~i)  is  positive. 


I.e. 


r  (z)  r(z  +  l^ ...  r  (^  +  ^)  =  7i*-"^(27r)*("-')r(n4 

Corollary.     Taking  «=2,  we  have 

22^-ir(2)r(2  +  *)  =  7r^r(22). 

This  is  called  the  duplication  formula. 

*  Werke,  Bd.  iii.  p.  149.     The  case  in  which  n  =  2  was  given  by  Legendre. 


12-15-12'2]  THE  GAMMA  FUNCTION  235 

Example.     If  jtt^  n\     r(y)r(g) 

shew  that 

B{p,q)B{p^.\,qy..B{p  +  '^,q) 
Bi^np,nq)=n-^        i^(?,  q)Bm,  q)...B{{n-l)q,  q\        ■ 

I 

12*16.     Expansions  for  the  logarithmic  derivates  of  the  Gamma-function. 
We  have  |r  (2  + 1)} " » =  e^^  n  jA  +  0  e' "I . 

Differentiating  logarithmically  (§  4-7),  this  gives 

d\ogT{z  +  \)_  z  z  z 

dz  ^"'"1(2+1)  "''2 (2  +  2)  "^3 (2+3)  ■''•••■ 

Therefore,  since  log  r  (2  +  l)  =  log2+T'  (2),  we  have 

d  1*1 

-J-  logr(2)=-y--  +  2  2       ■    ,     .. 

dz       °       ^  '  '       Z         n=lM'(2  +  7l) 

d^  d   (      z 

Diflerentiating  again,  ^logr(2  +  l)  =  ^  |^^ 


1)      2(2  +  2) 
1  1 

~(MnO=^(M^2  +  -- 

These  expansions  are  occasionally  vised  in  applications  of  the  theory. 
12"2.     Euler's  expression  of  V  {z)  as  an  infinite  integral. 
The  infinite  integral  /    e'H'^'^dt  represents  an  analytic  function  of  z  when  ■ 


0 

the  real  part  of  z  is  positive  (§  5'32) ;  it  is  called  the  Eulerian  Integral  of  the 
Second  Kindf.  It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  when  R  (z)  >  0,  the  integral  is 
equal  to  T(z).     Denoting  the  real  part  of  z  by  x,  we  have  x>0.     Now,  if:|: 

rn    /  f\n 

we  have  II{z,  n)  =  n^  j   (1  —  t)"t^~^c^t, 

Jo 

if  we  write  t  =  nT;  it  is  easily  shewn  by  repeated  integrations  by  parts  that, 
when  x>0  and  w  is  a  positive  integer, 

ri  ri  11    n  fi 

(1-t)«t^-1cZt=    -t^(I-t)'^     +-       (1  -  t)^-1t^c?t 

Jo  \_^  Jo         2:  J  Q 

z(z  +  l)  ...(z  +  n-l)J(i 

and  so  11  (z,  ??)  = ~ — ^-^^ r  n^. 

Hence,  by  the  example  of  §  12"11,  11  {z,  n)  -*  T  (z)  as  n -^  00  . 

*  If  the  real  part  of  z  is  not  positive  the  integral  does  not  converge  on  account  of  the  singu- 
larity of  the  integrand  at  f  =  0. 

t  The  name  was  given  by  Legendre  ;  see  §  12"4  for  the  Eulerian  Integral  of  the  First  Kind. 

:J:  The  many-valued  function  t^~'^  is  made  precise  by  the  equation  (^~i  =  e(^~^' '"»*,  log  t  being 
purely  real. 


236 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XII 


Consequently  r(^)=lim        (l--)t^-'dt. 

T,(z)=  f   e-H'^-'dt, 
Jo 


And  so,  if 
we  have 


T^{z)-T(2)=  lim 


[/:f-'-( 


nj 


/ 

J  n 


t^-^dt  +      e-H^-^dt 


Now  lim  [    e-H''-^dt  =  0, 


since  I    e~H^~^dt  converges. 

Jo 


To  shew  that  zero  is  the  limit  of  the  first  of  the  two  integrals  in  the 
formula  for  Fj  (z)  —  F  (z)  we  observe  that 


0<e- 


-(- 


<  n-H^e' 


[To  establish  these  inequalities,  we  proceed  as  follows  :  when  O^y  <  1, 
from  the  series  for  e^/  and  (I  -?/)~i.     Writing  t/n  for  y,  we  have 


and  so 


(l  +  ^)-%.-^(l 


0^e-t_(l-iY 


n)   ' 


<e-Mi-{i-5. 


A" 


Now,   if  O^a^l,   (l-a^'^l-na   by  induction   when   na<l    and   obviously  when 
?2a^l  ;   and,  writing  fijn^  for  a,  we  get 

\       n^J       n 

and  so*  0<e-«-(l j   ^e-H^jn, 

which  is  the  required  result.] 

From  the  inequalities,  it  follows  at  once  that 

je-'  -  (l  -  -)"1  t'-'dt  j  <  rn-'e-H^'+'dt 


<n-M     e-H''+^dt^O, 


as  n.  -^  oc  ,  since  the  last  integral  converges. 

*  This  analysis  is  a  modification  of  that  given  by  Schlomilch,  Compendium  der  hoheren 
Analysis,  ii.  p.  243.  A  simple  method  of  obtaining  a  less  precise  inequality  (which  is  sufiicient 
for  the  object  required)  is  given  by  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series,  p.  459. 


12-21]  THE  GAMMA   B'UNCTION  237 

Consequently  Fj  (z)  =  F  (z)  when  the  integral,  by  which  Fj  (z)  is  defined, 
converges ;  that  is  to  say  that,  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive, 


Jo 


e-H'-'dt 


And  so,  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive,  F  (z)  may  be  defined  either  by 
this  integral  or  by  the  Weierstrassian  product. 
'   Example  1.     Prove  that  when  R  (z)  is  positive 


Example  2.     Prove  that,  if  R{k)>0  and  R  (s)  >  0, 

T(s) 


/ 


0 


«  Example  3.     Prove  that,  if  R{z)>0  and  R(s)  >  I, 

1  1  1  _    1      pe-x^^-i 

•   Example  4.     From  §  12-1  example  2,  by  using  the  inequality 

deduce  that 

l_e-«_e-i/«  , 
a;. 


■=/: 


12 '21.  Extension  of  the  infinite  integral  to  the  case  in  which  the  argument  of  the 
Qammafunction  is  negative. 

The  formula  of  the  last  article  is  no  longer  applicable  when  the  real  part  of  z  is 
negative.  Saalschutz*  has  shewn  however  that,  for  negative  arguments,  an  analogous 
theorem  exists.     This  can  be  obtained  in  the  following  way. 

Consider  the  function 

where  k  is  the  integer  so  chosen  that  —k>x>  - /t  —  1,  x  being  the  real  part  of  z. 
By  partial  integration  we  have,  when  z<-\, 


r.(.)=[f(«--i+^-,4+...  +  (-r^;^,)' 


^k-l 


The  integrated  part  tends  to  zero  at  each  limit,  since  x-\-k  is  negative  and  x-^k  +  1  is 
positive  :  so  we  have 

Ti{z)  =  \T.^{z+\). 

The  same  proof  applies  when  x  lies  between  0  and  —  1,  and  leads  to  the  result 

r(2+i)  =  2r2(2)  (0>.i->-i). 

The  last  equation  shews  that,  between  the  values  0  and  —  1  of  .r, 

r2(2)=r(2). 

*  Zeitschriftfilr  Math,  und  Phys.  xxxii,  xxxiii. 


238  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

The  preceding  equation  then  shews  that  T^  {z)  is  the  same  as  r  {z)  for  all  negative 
values  of  R  (?)  less  than  -  1.  Thus  for  all  negative  values  of  R  {£),  we  have  the  result  of 
Saalschiitz 

where  k  is  the  integer  next  less  than  -  R  (2).  z     K  (^)  / 

Example.     If  a  function  F  (/x)  be  such  that  for  positive  values  of  fi  we  have 

Jo 
and  if  for  negative  values  of  yx  we  define  Pi  (fx)  by  the  equation 

Fii,x)=j\v'^-'(e-^-l+x-...  +  {-)^*'y^dx, 
where  k  is  the  integer  next  less  than  —  fj.,  shew  that 

AW  =  i'(M)-^+rT(^--  +  (-)^-^n(^-  (Saalschutz.) 

12*22.     Hankel's  expression  of  V  (z)  as  a  contour  integral. 

The  integrals  obtained  for  T{z)  in  §§  12-2,  12-21  are  members  of  a  large 
class  of  definite  integrals  by  which  the  Gamma- function  can  be  defined. 
The  most  general  integral  of  the  class  in  question  is  due  to  Hankel  *  ;  this 
integral  will  now  be  investigated. 

Let  D  be  a  contour  which  starts  from  a  point  p  on  the  real  axis,  encircles 
the  origin  once  counter-clockwise  and  returns  to  p. 

Consider  I    {— tf''^  e~^ dt,  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive  and  z  is  not 

an  integer. 

The  many-valued  function  (— 0^~^  is  to  be  made  definite  by  the  convention 
that  (—  ty~'^  =  e(«-i)iog(-0  and  log(-  t)  is  purely  real  when  t  is  on  the  negative 
part  of  the  real  axis,  so  that,  on  D,  —  tt  ^  arg  (—  t)  ^  tt. 

The  integrand  is  not  analytic  inside  D,  but,  by  §  5-2  corollary  1,  the  path 
of  integration  may  be  deformed  (without  affecting  the  value  of  the  integral) 
into  the  path  of  integration  which  starts  fi:om  p,  proceeds  along  the  real  axis 
to  h,  describes  a  circle  of  radius  8  counter-clockwise  round  the  origin  and 
returns  to  p  along  the  real  axis. 

On  the  real  axis  in  the  first  part  of  this  new  path  we  have  arg  {—t)  =  -  tt, 
so  that  (— ■^)^-i  =  e-''^(«-i)^~-i  (where  \ogt  is  purely  real);  and  on  the  last 
part  of  the  new  path  (- ^^-i  =  e"^(^-i)^«-i. 

On  the  circle  we  write  -t  =  8e^^ ;  then  we  get 

J  J)  J  p  J  -w 

+  \   e^^'^^-^H^-^e-Ht 
=  -  2i  sin  (ttz)  ("t'-'e-^dt  +  ih'  ['   e''^-^  (co,e+i^ne>  ^q 
*  Math.  Annalen,  i. 


12-22J  THE   GAMMA    FUNCTION  239 

This  is  true  for  all  positive  values  of  8  ^p;  now  make  S -►  0 ;  then  B'-^O 
and  j     ewfl-sc^ose+i^inoc^^-*  j     e'^HO  since  the  integrand  tends  to  its  limit 

J   —IT  J    -IT 

uniformly. 

We  consequently  infer  that 


/. 


(-  ty-^e-Ht  =  -  2t  sin  {irz)  ft^'-'e-^dt. 

D  Jo 


This  is  true  for  all  positive  values  of  p ;  make  p^  <x> ,  and  let  C  be  the 
limit  of  the  contour  D. 


Then  [  (-  tf-'  e"'  dt=-  2i  sin  (ttz)  (   t'-'  e"'  dt 

J  c  Jo 

Therefore  T(z)  =  -  ^ f  (-  tf-'  e"'  dt. 

zismirz  J  c 

Now,  since  the  contour  G  does  not  pass  through  the  point  t  =  0,  there 
is  no  need  longer  to  stipulate   that   the   real   part  of  z  is   positive ;   and 

I    {—ty~^e~*dt  is  a  one- valued  analytic  function  of  z  for  all  values  of  z. 
J  c 

Hence,  by  §  5*5,  the  equation,  just  proved  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive, 
persists  for  all  values  of  z  with  the  exception  of  the  values  0,  ±1,  ±2, 

Consequently,  for  all  except  integer  values  of  z, 

T(z)  =  -  —i f  (-  ty-'  e-'  dt 

^  '         2i  sm  iTz]  c 

This  is  Hankel's  formula ;  if  we  write  \  —  z  for  z  and  make  use  of  §  12-14, 
we  get  the  further  result  that 

/•(0+)  /•  .  , 

We  shall  write  for        ,  meaning  thereby  that  the  path  of  inte- 

Jco  J  C 

gration  starts  at  '  infinity '  on  the  real  axis,  encircles  the  origin  in  the  positive 
direction  and  returns  to  the  starting  point. 


Example  1.     Shew  that  if  the  real  part  of  z  be  positive,  I  ( -  t)~^e~*dt  tends  to 


zero  as 


p-*.Qo,  when  the  path  of  integration  is  either  of  the  quadrants  of  circles  of  radius  p  +  1 
with  centres  at  —1,  the  end  points  of  one  quadrant  being  p  +  1,  —l+i{p  +  l),  and  of  the 
other  p  +  1,  —  1 -i(p  +  l). 


240  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

■   Deduce  that  ■  lim    I      ~^\- t)-'e-*dt=  lim   j  {-t)-^e-*dt, 


p-*-ao  J   -1+ip  p-*-oo 

and  putting  t=  -l+i  tan  6  in  the  first  integral  shew  that 


r 


L  =  1   r "  cos  (tane-zd)  cos^ ~^edB. 
(z)      ^  Jo 


Example  2.     By  taking  as  contour  of  integration  a  parabola  whose  focus  is  the  origin, 
shew  that,  if  a  >  0,  then 

Y  (z)  =  ^'i^       e-a«2  ( 1  +  fi)z-i  cos  {2at  +  ( 22  - 1 )  arc  tan  t}  dt. 

^  '       SHI  TTS  j  0 

(Bourguet.) 
Example  3.     Investigate  the  values  of  x  for  which  the  integral 

-  I    ^^-isin^o^it 
TT  y  0 

converges  ;  for  such  values  of  x  express  it  in  terms  of  Ganama-functions,  and  thence  shew 
that  it  is  equal  to 

(St  John's,  1902.) 

Example  4.     Prove  that    |     (log  ^)"»  dt  converges  when   m  >  0,   and,  by  means 

jo  i 

of  example  3,  evaluate  it  when  m  =  l  and  when  ?«-  =  2, 

(St  John's,  1902.) 

12'3.     Gauss  expression  for  the  logarithmic  derivate  of  the  Gamma-function 
as  an  infinite  integral*. 

We   shall   now   express   the   function  j-  log  F  (z)  =  -pj^^  as  an  infinite 

integral  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive ;   the  function  in  question  is 
frequently  written  1^(2^).     We  first  need  a  new  formula  for  7. 

Take  the  formula  (§  12-2  example  4) 

-/:^*-/:T'--{/:f-/:T*-} 


where  A  =  l  — e    ,  since 


/'?  =  logr^,.^,-OasS-.0. 


t         ''l-e-s 
Writing  ^  =  1  — e~"in  the  first  of  these  integrals  and  then  replacing  w  by  ^  we  have 


y=  lim  i  I     , -dt-  i     ~  dti 


^       -^Xe-^dt. 


\\-e-i      t 
This  is  the  formula  for  y  which  was  required. 


Werke,  Bd.  in.  p.  159. 


12-3] 


THE  OAMMA   FUNCTION 


241 


To  get  Gauss'  formula,  take  the  equation  (§  1216) 

r'(^)  1      ,.        «    /I  1     \ 

^-J  =-7 4-lim    S 

r(^)  '       Z       »— 00  m  =  i  \"^      z  +  mj 


and  write 


1  f^ 

+  r>i     Jo 


this  is  permissible  when  vi  =  0,  1,  2,  ...  if  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive. 
It  follows  that 


p     ,   =-7-       e-'Ult  +  lim  t  (e-"**-e-<"*+^'*)(^^ 

^   K^)  Jo  n-*-oo  Jo    m  =  l 


=  —  7+  lim 


g-«  _  g— zt  _  g—  (n+1) «    r    g— (z+n+i)  f 


1-e- 


t/^ 


io     \  ^         1  -  e-V  n^oo  Jo 


0    \  ^        1  -  e- 


1  —  ^-^^ 

1    ^ — t 


n-*-oo  Jo      •••       ^ 
is  a  bounded  function  of  t  whose  limit  as  t^O  is  finite ; 


Now,  when  0<t^l, 

and  when  i;>l,  1^ — ' — ^    <  "  '  '" — —<■ 

^   '  I  l-e-«         1-e-i        1-e-i 

Therefore  we  can  find  a  number  K  independent  of  t  such  that,  on  the  path  of  integration, 


l  +  le- 


and  so 


1  —a-^t  I 
1  —  e    'I 


1-e- 


We  have  thus  proved  the  formula 

fW  =  ;|iogr(.)=/;(^-l'-ji^)* 

which  is  Gauss'  expression    of  i/r  (^)  as  an  infinite  integral.      It  may  be 
remarked  that  this  is  the  first  integral  which  we  have  encountered  connected 
with  the  Gamma-function  in  which  the  integrand  is  a  single-valued  function. 
Writing  i:  =  log  (1  -\-x)  in  Gauss'  result,  we  get,  if  A  =  e*  -  1, 


r(^)     6^0  ys    \t 


1-e-tj 


\-dt 


dx 

A  x{\-\-xy 


=  lim 

5^0 


{/: 


dt 


0<  --dt<\     —  =  log    -— -^OasS-^0. 


Hence 


so  that 


r'{z) 


=  lim 


1 


r  (2)        A^O  J  A 

T'{z)  =  r{z)  I      se 


an  equation  due  to  Dirichlet*. 


dx 

(l+.ttJ  "?' 

Werke,  Bd.  i.  p.  275. 


W.   M.   A. 


16 


242  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 

Example  1.     Prove  that,  if  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive, 


*(^)=/:{^4-rS/ 


dt. 


Example  2.     Shew  that 


{{\+t)-^-e-i}t-^dt. 


[chap.  XII 

(Gauss.) 
(Dirichlet.) 


12'31.     Binet's  first  expression  for  log  V  {z)  in  terms  of  an  infinite  integral. 

Binet*  has  given  two  expressions  for  logr(2^)  which  are  of  great 
importance  as  shewing  the  way  in  which  log  V  {z)  behaves  as  |  ^  |  -*  x  .  To 
obtain  the  first  of  these  expressions,  we  observe  that,  when  the  real  part  of 
2  is  positive. 


=/:It-;^i-. 


T{z  +  \) 
writing  z-\-l  for  ^  in  |  12'3. 

Now,  by  §  6*222  example  6,  we  have 

log  ^  =  M 


"^  «-«  _   c-tZ 


and  so,  since 

we  have 

d 


0  t 

"1 


dt, 


(2^)-i=       ^e-^'dt, 
0    ^ 


^^  log  r  (.  + 1)  =  ^^  +  log  .  -  j^  1^  -  ^  +  ^^}  e-"  dt. 

The  integrand  in  the  last  integral   is  continuous  as   ^^0;    and   since 

111 

h  - — -   is   bounded  as  t-*oo ,  it  follows  without  difficulty  that  the 

2      ^      e*  - 1  '  -^ 

integral  converges  uniformly  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive ;   we  may 

consequently  integrate  from  1  to  z  under  the  sign  of  integration  (§  4'44)  and 

we  getf 


logr(^+l)  =  U  +  ^    log  2^-^  +  1  -I- 


1      1 

K-T  + 


dt. 


^^"^M2-^  +  e^lU 


is  continuous  as  ^  ^  0  by  §  7"2,  and  since 


Ave  have 


log  r  (^  + 1)  =  log  2-  +  log  r  {z), 


iogr(2)  =  ('^--]  iog2-^  +  i  + I    L-T  + 


t 


dt 


2-7  +  e^-iiT^'- 


*  Journal  de  VEcole  Poly  technique,  xvi.  (1839),  pp.  123-143. 

t  Log  r  (2  +  1)  means  the  sum  of  the  principal  values  of  the  logarithms  in  the  factors  of 
the  Weierstrassian  product. 


12-31]  THE   GAMMA   FUNCTION  243 

To  evaluate  the  second  of  these  integrals,  let* 

so  that,  taking  «=^  in  the  last  expression  for  log  T{z),  we  get 

Ai        •         7      /""/l     2         1     \  «-i< 

Also,  since  1=  I     h^--+   ,. —     ——at,  we  have 

7o   \2     «      e*'-l/     «  •  ■ 

~  jo   V   «        e'-lj  «  • 

And  .so  J=\     \ — -.  +  4e-< \.  - — -I  _ 

jo    1   t        e'-l      2  t    ^e«-lj    t 

f^  {e-ht-e-*     ,      A  dt 

-j.  |-T — *n-T 

=jo  {-ja— r-;---7— --27^^ 

=L r-Jo+*Jo  -t--'' 

Consequently  /=  1  - 1  log  (27r). 

We  therefore  have  Binet's  result  that,  when  the  real  part  of  z  is  positive, 

If  z  =  x  +  iy,  we  see  that,  if  the  upper  bound  of    (  ^  —  -  4-  ^ — ^ )  7  ■  ^'^'^  "^^^^ 
values  of  t  is  K,  then 

|logr(^)-(^-^)log^  +  ^-^log(27r):  <k\    e-'^dt 

<  Kx-\ 
so  that,  when  x  is  large,  the  terms  iz  —  ^\  log  ^  —  ^^  +  ^  log  {2ir)  furnish  an 
approximate  expression  for  log  V  {z). 
Example  1.     Prove  that,  when  li{z)>0, 

log  r  {z)  =  JJ  {'7-T-' '  +  (-"  - 1)  «-'}  7  •  (Malm,sten.) 

Example  2.     Prove  that,  when  /^  (z)  >  0, 

*  This  artifice  is  due  to  Pringsheim,  Math.  Annalen,  xxxi. 

IG— 2 


244  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

Example  3.     From  the  formula  of  §  12-14,  shew  that,  if  0  <  ^  <  1, 

2logr(^-)-log-+logsm.^-  =  j^    [-^^ (1-2^0^- jy 

(Kummer.) 

Example  4.     By  expanding  sinh  {\  —  x)t  and  1  -  2.1?  in  Fourier  sine  series,  shew  from 
example  3  that,  if  0  <  .r  <  1, 

log  r(;r)  =  -^  log  TT--^  log  sin  77^  +  2  2  a„sin2/i7r^, 

n=\ 

Deduce  from  example  2  that 

a,i  =  2 — (y  +  log27r  +  logn).  (Kummer.) 

12*32.     Binet's  second  expression  for   log  F  (z)   in   terms   of  an   infinite 
integral. 

Consider  the  application  of  example  7  of  Chapter  vii  (p.  145)  to  the 
equation  (§  12'16) 

-f-„iogr(^)=  2  7-^,. 

The  conditions  there    stated  as   sufficient  for  the    transformation  of  a 

series  into  integrals  are  obviously  satisfied  by  the  function  (f)  (^)  =  ^ 77. ., , 

if  the  real  part  of  ^  be  positive ;  and  we  have 

where  2iq  (t)  =  -. r-r.,  —  ,   — .-rz . 

^  ^  ^     (z  +  ity      (z  -  itf 

Since  \q(t,  z  -\-  n)  \  is  easily  seen  to  be  less  than  Kit/n,  where  A''!  is  inde- 
pendent of  t  and  ??,  it  follows  that  the  limit  of  the  last  integral  is  zero. 

Hence  |,log  T  (.)  =  ^^^  +  J  +/^    ~y,  ^-^  . 

Since  '  ^ — -'  does  not  exceed  K  (where  K  depends  only  on  8)  when  the 

Z     "T~  V     I 

real   part   of  z  exceeds  8,   the   integral    converges   uniformly   and    we    may 
integrate  under  the  integral  sign  (§  4'44)  from  1  to  z. 

We  get 

f Z  ,      „ ,  ,  1        ,  X,     ^  f  "*  tdt 

-J-  log  r  (^)  =  -  — -  +  log  ^  +  C  -  2  ~ -.'^-.-irr, — ,-s , 

dz     ^     ^  ^         1z         ^  Jo  {z"  +  t^){e-''^  -1} 

where  0  is  a  constant.     Integrating  again, 

log  r  (.)  =  (.  -  ^)  log .  +  (C  - 1 ) .  +  c  +  2  JJ  •'"■'^i:^^^  dt, 

where  C  is  a  constant. 


12-32,  12-33]  THE   GAMMA   FUNCTION  245 

Now  if  z  is  real  0  <  arc  tan  t\z  ^  tjz, 

and  so 


dt. 


\ogV{z)-{z-^^\ogz-{C-\)z-C'\<\\^^^-^ 

But  it  has  been  shewn  in  §  12*31  that 

logr(^)-(^-|)log^  +  ^-^log(27r)Uo, 

as  2^  ^  00   through  real  values.     Comparing  these  results  we  see  that  C  =  0, 
C'  =  hog(27r). 


2 

Hence  for  all  values  of  z  whose  real  part  is  positive, 


logr(^)  =  (z-i)log^-0  +  llog(27r)  +  2J'J 
where  arc  tan  u  is  defined  by  the  equation 


arc  tan  (tlz)  ,, 


dt 

arc  tan  u  = 


'o  1  +  ^-^' 

in  which  the  path  of  integration  is  a  straight  line. 

This  is  Binet's  second  expression  for  log  T  (z). 

*  Example.     Justify  differentiating  with  regard  to  z  under  the  sign  of  integration,  so  as 
to  get  the  equation 

r'(2)  1  p  tdt 


-''^'-h-'jl 


T(z)      ^        2z        Jo  {t^  +  z^){e'i^t-i)- 

12*33.  The  asymptotic  expansion  of  the  logarithm  of  the  Gamma-function 
(Stirling's  series). 

We  can  now  obtain  an  expansion  which  represents  the  function  log  T  (z) 
asymptotically  (§  8*2)  for  large  values  of  \z\,  and  which  is  used  in  the 
calculation  of  the  Gamma-function. 

Let  us  assume  that,  if  z  =  x  +  iy,  then  x'^h  >0;  and  we  have,  by  Binet's 
second  formula, 

log  r  {z)  =[z-  -^\ogz-z  +  -  log  27r  +  <^  {z\ 


where  (f){z)  =  2  1 

Jo 


arc  tan  (t/z)  ,, 
dt. 


2nt  _   I 

Now 

,    .   ,        t        It'        It'  (_)n-i   pi-i        (-)n    rf   u^n^lf^ 

arc  tan  (t  z)  =  -- ^ -,  + ^ -,-■•■  +1       ,    ^;^,  +  V-fr       -—-..■ 
^  '   ^      z      S  z^      5  z^  2?i  —  I  2-"  1      Z^*'  ^  J  0  u-  +  z- 


Substituting  and  remembering  (§  7*2)  that 

r^-^  dt  _  Bn 
'  0   e-'''  -  1  ~  4n  ' 


y  0 


246  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

where  Bi,  Bo,  ...  are  Bernoulli's  numbers,  we  have 

(-)^  r  I  f^u^'^du)       dt 
'''-'  Jo    [JoU^+  n  e-'^'^-l' 

for  positive  values  of  uhe  K^. 


^2 


Let  the  upper  bound*  of 

Then 

du]      dt 


^    (    rt  u'^n 


0  li'  +  z""]  e^'^*  -  1 


ic^  +  ^■■' 

^  -ST,  I  ^  1 


"^  (  rt  \       (H 

u^^du[  ~--7 — - 

g-int  _   I 


0      \,J  0 
J^z  Bn+1 


Hence 


4(n  +  ])(2?i  +  l)j^|2" 


2(-y 


0    uo 


'li^'du)       dt 


y2  ^  ^2      g2,rt  _  I 


K,Bn 


2(?i  +  l)(27H-l)|^p"+i' 


and  it  is  obvious  that  this  tends  to  zero  uniformly  as  |  ^  1  ^  oo  if  |  arg  ^  j  ^  ^tt  —  A, 
where  :|7r  >  A  >  0,  so  that  K^  ^  cosec  2A. 

Also  it  is  clear  that  if  '  arg  ^  j  ^  :^7r  (so  that  Kz=  1)  the  error  in  taking  the 
first  n  terms  of  the  series 

,.=i2r(2r-l)2-'-i 
as  an  approximation  to  0  (z)  is  numerically  less  than  the  (n  +  l)th  term. 
Since,  if  j  arg  z\^^7r  —  A, 

\  z^^-'  U  {z)  -  I  -/:;t^{-J  \  <  cosec^  2  A  .  ^"+^ 


,=i2r(2r-l) 
as  ^  ^  X  ,  it  is  clear  that 


2(w+l)(2n  +  l) 


0, 


5,  B^ 


1.2.Z     3  . 4 .  ^«  '  5 .  6 .  ^^ 
is  the  asymptotic  expansion i*  (§  8-2)  of  ^{z). 
We  see  therefore  that  the  series 


1\  1  °°       (—y-^B 

z  -  ^\\og  z  -  z  +  -\o^  2ir  +  X  ' 


,.=i2r(2r-l)2^'-i 
is  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  log  V  {£)  when  |  arg  z\i^\'k  —  A. 

*  7u--  is  the  lower  bound  of  ^-^  ^^'  ~  -''^^  ^"  +  ^'"'"•^^ 


4.r'-')/- 


(.i-^  +  T/'-i)^ 


and  is  consequently  equal  to 


(x'^  +  y 


.,,   or    1    as  a;2  <  (/2  or   .t2>?/2. 


t  The  development  is  asymptotic ;  for  if  it  converged  when  |  2  |  ^  p,  we  could  find  K,  by  §  2-6, 
3h  that  B^  <  (2«  -  1)  2nKp^'' ;  anc 
function  ;  this  is  contrary  to  §  7'2. 


such  that  B^  <  (2n  -  1)  2nKp-"  ;  and  then  the  series   S      -    ,0  Ti  "  ^   would   define  an  integral 

n=i  (^'0  ! 


12-4]  THE   GAMMA   FUNCTION  247 

This  is  generally  known  as  Stirling's  series.     In  Chapter  xiii,  it  will  be 
established  over  the  extended  range  |  arg  ^^  |  ^  tt  —  A. 

In  particular  when  z  is  positive  (=  x),  we  have 

v?^dn^      dt  Bn+i 


-^/:i0 


+  ar*]  e=*'  -  1      2  (w  + 1)  {2n  +  l)a^ 

Hence,  when  ooO,  the  value  of  (f>{x)  always  lies  between  the  sum  of 
n  terms  and  the  sum  of  n  +  1  terms  of  the  series  for  all  values  of  n. 

n  Q 

In  particular  0  <  4>{x)<  ri — —■ ,  so  that  <f>  (x)  =  --^,  where  0  <  ^  <  1. 

Hence  T  (*•)  =  ^"^  ^  e  "  ^  {^irf  /^^''^l 

Also,  taking  the  exponential  of  Stirling's  series,  we  get 

_.,   .,_i         xf  1  1  139  571       ^^/IM, 

I(^)-^.      X     -  (2-)^  |1  + 12^ +  288^. -51840^,- 2488320^ +  ^t^^^ 

This  is  an  asymptotic  formula  for  the  Gammaf unction.  In  conjunction 
with  the  formula  F  (x  +  1)  =  xT  (x),  it  is  very  useful  for  the  purpose  of  com- 
puting the  numerical  value  of  the  function  for  real  values  of  x. 

Tables  of  the  function  logr(.r),  correct  to  12  decimal  places,  for  values  of  x  between 
1  and  2,  were  constructed  in  this  way  by  Legendre,  and  published  in  his  Exercices  de 
Calcul  Integral,  Tome  ii.  p.  85,  in  1817,  and  his  Traite  des  fonctions  elliptiques  (1826), 
p.  489. 

It  may  be  observed  that  r  {x)  has  one  minimum  for  positive  values  of  .r,  when 
jr  =  l-4616321...,  the  value  of  log  r(:r)  then  being  T-9472391.... 

Example.     Obtain  the  expansion,  convergent  when  R  {z)  >  0, 

log T{z)  =  (z-^)\ogz-z  +  i  log  (27r)  +  J {z), 
where 

^'     -  \2+1^2(z+l)(2  +  2)^3(0  +  l)(2  +  2)(s  +  3)^"'J  ' 
in  which 

^1  =  ^5       ^2=3,       ^3  =  1^^,       C4  =  -T(f5 

and  generally 

c^=  I    (.r  +  1)  (A-  +  2) ...  {x  +  n-\y{2x-l)xdx.  (Binet.) 

J  0 

12"4.     The  Eulerian.  Integrxil  of  the  First  Kind. 

The  name  Eulerian  Integral  of  tJte  First  Kind  was  given  by  Legendre  to 
the  integral 

B(p,q)=[  xP-'  ( 1  -  x)i-^  dx, 

Jo 

which  was  first  studied  by  Euler  and  Legendre*.  In  this  integral,  the  real 
parts  of  p  and  q  are  supposed  to  be  positive;  and  xP~'^,  (1  —  x)i~'^  are  to  be 
understood  to  mean  those  values  of  e*^~'""*''^  and  e(7-i)iog(i-a;)  which  correspond 
to  the  real  determinations  of  the  logarithms. 

*  Euler,  Petrop.  N.  Coinm.  xvi.  (1772);  Legendre,  Exerclces,  i.  p.  221. 


248  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

With  these  stipulations,  it  is  easily  seen  that  B  {p,  q)  exists,  as  a  (possibly 
improper)  integral  (§  4-5  example  2). 

We  have,  on  wi-iting  {1  —  x)  for  x, 

B{p,q)  =  Biq,p). 

Also,  integrating  by  parts, 

f  xP-^  (1  -  xy  dx  =  [  — ^^  ~  '^^^   V  2  C  ^'^  (1  -  ^Y-'  dx, 

Jo  L      i^      Jo    pJo     ^       ' 

or  B\p,q  +  \)  =  'i^B{p-^\,q). 

P 

•  Example  1.     Shew  that 

'  Example  2.     Deduce  from  example  1  that 

'  Example  3.     Prove  that  if  n  is  a  positive  integer, 

1.2...W 


^to»+i)=^(p+i)...(^+„, 


'  Example  4.     Prove  that 
Example  5.     Prove  that 


^(-'^)=/,°"(r^.^«- 


r(0)=    lim  n'  B  {z,  n). 


12-41.  Expression  of  the  Eulerian  Integral  of  the  First  Kind  in  terms  of 
the  Gamma  function. 

We  shall  now  establish  the  important  theorem 

B  {m,  n)  =  ~-~r^^-^' . 
1  (m  +  7? ) 

First  let  the  real  parts  of  in  and  n  exceed  ^ ;  then 

r  {m)  V  (n)  =  I     e-=^  .^'«-i  ^Z^-  x  I    e~y  y''~^  dy. 

■f  0  Jo 

On  writing  a;^  for  x,  and  ?/-  for  ?/,  this  gives 

[R  rR 

V  ( m)  r  {n)  =  4  hm   I    g-^-  a'-'^-i  dx  x       g-^/'  y^^-i  (it/ 

rll    rB 
=  4  lim    1      I    e-^'^'+y-^  x-"'-Uf'''-^dxdy. 

Now  for  the  values  of  m  and  ?i  under  consideration  the  integrand  is 
continuous  over  the  range  of  mtegration,  and  so  the  integral  may  be  con- 
sidered as  a  double  integral  taken  over  a  square  S^.     Calling  the  integrand 


12-41]  THE  GAMMA   FUNCTION  249 

f{x,  y),  and  calling  Qjt  the  quadrant  with  centre  at  the  origin  and  radius  R, 
we  have,  if  Tji  be  the  part  oi  8r  outside  Qr, 

I      f(^>  y)  dxdy  -  1 1      fix,  y)  dxdy ' 

JJSr  JjQji 

=  1     fi^>y)d^dy\ 

^    I     \f(^>y)\d^dy 

</[     \f(^>y)\da;dy-  \f{x,y)dxdy\ 

-*0  as  R-*  CO  , 
since   1 1      \f{^,  y)  I  dxdy  converges  to  a  limit,  namely 

2  I     g-^'  I  a;2'»-i  j  cZiT  X  2  I     e"!''  j  y''''-^  \  dy. 
Jo  Jo 

Therefore 


lim  /  /     f(x,  y)  dxdy  =  lim  f{x,  y)  dxdy. 


Changing  to  polar*  coordinates  {x  =  r  cos  6,  y  =  r  sin  6),  we  have 

f(x,  y)dxdy  =^  | 
Qr 

Hence 


[f    /('^j  y)  dxdy  =i    f    e-'-  (r  cos  df-'  (r  sin  (9)-"-^  rdrdd. 

J  J  Qn  ^  J  0   J  0 


r  (m)  r  (7^)  =  4       e-'V^  (m+n)-i  ^^       cos^"*-i  6  sin^^-^  ^c?(9 

Jo  J  i) 


2r  (7?i  +  n)        cos^'"-!  (9  sin-"-i  (9£^^. 


Writing  cos^  0  =  u  we  at  once  get 

r  (m)  r  (/?)  =  r  (m  +  ?i) .  i?  (r?i,  n). 

This  has  only  been  proved  when  the  real  parts  of  in  and  n  exceed  | ;  but 
it  can  obviously  be  deduced  when  these  are  less  than  2  ^Y  §  ^^'^  example  2. 

This  result  connects  the  Eulerian  Integral  of  the  First  Kind  with  the 
Gamma-function. 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

J -1  ^  ^{P  +  3) 

*  It  is  easily  proved  by  the  methods  of  §  4-11  that  the  areas  Am.iJ.  of  §  4-3  need  not  be  rect- 
angles provided  only  that  their  greatest  diameters  can  be  made  arbitrarily  small  by  taking  the 
number  of  areas  sufficiently  large ;  so  the  areas  may  be  taken  to  be  the  regions  bounded 
by  radii  vectores  and  circular  arcs. 


250  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP,  XII 

Example  2.     Shew  that  if 

/^^,y;-_^    -^07  +  1+       2r~^  +  2  3!  ^  +  3+- 

then 

/(^.y)=/(y  +  l,  ^-1), 
where  x  and  y  have  such  values  that  the  series  are  convergent.  (Jesus,  1901.) 

Example  3.     Prove  that 

r  [ f{^xy){\-xT-^y^{\-yY-^dxdy  =  ^-^$^  [ f{z){\-zr^^-Uz. 
J  0  J  0  i  V/^  +  ''}    y  0 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

12*42.     Evaluation  of  trigonometrical  integrals  in  terms  of  the  Gamma- 
function, 

We  can  now  evaluate  the  integral  I      coB'^~^xsm'^~'^  xdx,  where  m  and  n 

Jo 

are  not  restricted  to  be  integers,  but  have  their  real  parts  positive. 
For  writing  cos^r  =  t,  we  have,  as  in  §  12'41, 

,  '    cos--^  sin->^- dx  =  I  ^:(M^^ . 
0  2   r{^m  +  ^n) 

The  well-known  elementary  formulae  for  the  case  in  which  m  and  n  are 
integers  can  be  at  once  derived  from  this. 

Example.     Prove  that,  when  \k\<\, 

fm-\-\\      Ai+1\ 
/'^cos"'(9sin»(9c^(9_  ^  V     2    /  ^  V"2~/    [l      cos'"  + " (9 c^(9 

U  Ti^^I^'^T*  "    ./.r('i±|^)   ^"  (ilTW?' 

(Trinity,  1898.) 

12"43.  Pochhammers*  extension  of  the  Eiderian  Integral  of  the  First 
Kind. 

We  have  seen  in  §  12"22  that  it  is  possible  to  replace  the  second  Eulerian 
integral  for  T  {z)  by  a  contour  integral  which  converges  for  all  values  of  z. 
A  similar  process  has  been  carried  out  by  Pochhammer  for  Eulerian  integrals 
of  the  first  kind. 

Let  P  be  any  point  on  the  real  axis  between  0  and  1 ;  consider  the 
integral 

ra  +  ,  Of,  l-,0-) 

e-^'  (»+^>  r-i  (1  -  tf-'  dt  =  €  (a,  13). 

.'  p 

The  notation  employed  is  that  introduced  at  the  end  of  §  12-22  and 
means  that  the  path  of  integration  starts  from  P,  encircles  the  point  1  in  the 
positive  (counter-clockwise)  direction  and  returns  to  P,  then  encircles  the 
origin  in  the  positive  direction  and  returns  to  P,  and  so  on. 

*  Math.  Annalen,  Bd.  xxxv.  p.  495. 


12-42,  12-43] 


THE  GAMMA   FUNCTION 


251 


At  the  starting-point  the  arguments  of  t  and  1  —t  are  both  zero ;  after 
the  circuit  (1  +)  they  are  0  and  27r ;  after  the  circuit  (0  +)  they  are  27r  and 
2'7r ;  after  the  circuit  (1  — )  they  are  27r  and  0  and  after  the  circuit  (0  — )  they 
are  both  zero,  so  that  the  final  value  of  the  integrand  is  the  same  as  the 
initial  value. 

It  is  easily  seen  that,  since  the  path  of  integration  may  be  deformed  in 
any  way  so  long  as  it  does  not  pass  over  the  branch  points  0,  1  of  the 
integrand,  the  path  may  be  taken  to  be  that  shewn  in  the  figure,  wherein 
the  four  parallel  lines  are  supposed  to  coincide  with  the  real  axis. 


If  the  real  parts  of  a  and  /3  are  positive  the  integrals  round  the  circles 
tend  to  zero  as  the  radii  of  the  circles  tend  to  zero  * ;  the  integrands  on  the 
paths  marked  a,  h,  c,  d  are 

i»-i  (1  -  ty-\   ^-Hi  -  0^~'  e^"'  *^~'^ 

^a—lg2TTi(a—l)  Q   _  A3-1  g27ri(/3-l)  ^a-1  g27rt  (a-1)  Q  _  A(3-T 

respectively,  the  arguments  of  t  and  1  —  ^  now  being  zero  in  each  case. 

Hence  we  may  write  e(a,  /3)  as  the  sum  of  four  (possibly  improper) 
integrals,  thus : 


e(a,  ;Q)-e-"'''+^) 


[  ^*-i  (1  -  tf-'  dt+(  ^-1  (1  -  ty-'  e'^'^  dt 
Jo  .'  1 


dt 


Hence 


+  r  f^-'  (1  -  ty-'  e-^'  <'^+^»  dt  +  (   ^-1  (1  -  0^-' 
Jo  -1 

€  (a,  /3)  =  e-'^  <"+^'  (1  -  e''*'<^)  (1  -  e'^'^)  f  t''-'  (1  -  ty-'  dt 

Jo 

...    .  .  ._  ,r(a)r(^) 

=  -  4  sm  (avr)  sm  {/dir)  YToT+Jj 

_   -47r' 

"r(l-a)r(l-/3)r(a  +  /3)- 

Now  6  (a,  /3)  and  this  last  expression  are  analytic  functions  of  a  and  of  /3 
for  all  values  of  a  and  /3.  So,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  this 
equality,  proved  when  the  real  parts  of  a  and  /S  are  positive,  holds  for  all 
values  of  a  and  /3.     Hence  for  all  values  of  a  and  /3  lue  have  proved  that 

-  47r^ 

^  ^"'  ^^ "  r(i-a)ra-y8)r(a+yS)  • 

*  The  reader  ought  to  have  no  difficulty  in  proving  this. 


252  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

12*5.     Dirichlet's  integral*. 

We  shall  now  shew  how  the  repeated  integral 

I=Jj...Jf(t,  +  t,+  ...+  tn)  «i"'-i  «/^-^  . . .  *n»"-^  dt,  dh...  dtn 

may  be  reduced  to  a  simple  integral,  where  /is  continuous,  a^  >  0  (r  =  1,  2,  ...n) 
and  the  integration  is  extended  over  all  positive  values  of  the  variables  such 
that  ^1  +  ^2+  ...  +^„^1. 

To  simplify         f'^  f^"^'  f{t+T^\)t'^-'  T^-' dtdT 

Jo        .'0 

(where  we  have  written  t,  T,  a,  /3  for  ti,  t^,  a^,  a^  and  A,  for  ^3  +  ^4+ ...  +tn), 
put  t=  T{1  —  v)/v ;  the  integral  becomes  (if  X  ^t  0) 

r~^  r         f{X+  T/v)  (1  -  vy-'  v-^-^  T-^+^-i dv  dT. 
Jo     J  r/(i-A) 

Changing  the  order  of  integration  (§  4*5 1),  the  integral  becomes 

f  r^^^yiX  +  T/v)  (1  -  vy-'  V-"-!  T'^+i^-'  dTdv. 
J  0  J  0 

Putting  T  ^  VT2,  the  integral  becomes 
I   I     V  (\  +  T2)  (1  -  y)«-i  v^-'  T/+^-i  dr.  <i-^^ 

Hence 

J.  ^  r  («l)I>0   [  f  .  .      /'y  (        ^.  ^    +  .  . .   +  t^^^  ^a^a^^  ^  .3-1   .  . .  tn'^n-^  cIt,  dt,  . . .  dtn , 

the  integration  being  extended  over  all  positive  values  of  the  variables  such 
that  T2  +  4  +  •  •  •  +  ^n  ^  1- 

Continually  reducing  in  this  way  we  get 

r(7,  +  a,+  ...+an)  Jo-^ 
which  is  Dirichlet's  result. 
Example  1.     Reduce 

to  a  simple  integral  ;  the  range  of  integration  being  extended  over  all  positive  valnes 
of  the  variables  such  that 

it  being  assumed  that  a,  6,  c,  a,  /3,  y,  y>,  f^,  -r  are  positive.  (Dirichlet.) 

*  Ges.  Woke,  i.  pp.  375,  391. 


125]  THE   GAMMA    FUNCTION  253 

Example  2.     Evaluate  j  I  xt>i/<'dxdy, 

m  and  n  being  positive  and 

•^^0,    y^O,     ji-"»+y»<l.  (Pembroke,  1907.) 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  moment  of  inertia  of  a  homogeneous  ellipsoid  of  unit 
density,  taken  about  the  axis  of  z,  is 

-  I  (a2  +  62)  „abc, 
where  a,  b,  c  are  the  semi-axes. 

Example  4.     Shew  that  the  area  of  the  epicycloid  x^+y^  =  l^  is  |jrR 


REFERENCES. 

N.  Nielsen,  Handbuch  der  Gamma-funktion*'. 

0.  ScHLOMlLCH,  Compendium  der  hoheren  Analysis,  Bd.  ii. 

E.  L.  LiKDELOF,  Le  Calcul  des  Re'sidus,  Ch.  iv. 

A.  Pringsheim,  Math.  Ann.  xxxi. 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that 

('-'O+O  0-1)  H)-'ni^ifvii-i7y 

(Trinity,  1897.) 

2.  Shew  that 

J^lih  iTP  ITF-  iTl^"^=^^"+'^-      ^^""^^^'  '^^'-^ 

3.  Prove  that 

r'  (I)    v  (i) 

rfi-)-f^=2log2.  (Jesus,  1903.) 

4.  Shew  that 

{r(i)}4       32      52-1       72      92-1      112 

T6,r2   =  3^:11  •  -^2-  •  7231  •  ^i^  •  11231  ••••    (Trinity,  1891.) 

5.  Shew  that 

„=o   [    (n+/3)(n  +  y)     \       n  +  iyj  tt        ^      ^      v'-'   /^ 

(Trinity,  1905.) 

8       /r\      640  /  TT  \3 

6.  Shew  that  n  r  ( -j  = -g^- (  —  j  .  (Peterhouse,  1906.) 

7.  Shew  that,  if  z  =  i^  where  f  is  real,  then 

'''^^^l==\/(c^rhTt)-  (Trinity,  1904.) 

8.  When  x  is  positive,  shew  thatt 

-^-  fJ^rZ  22»^!  .,h-         (^^^^h.  Trip,  1897.) 

*  This  work  contains  a  complete  biblioKvaphj'. 

+  This  and  some  other  examples  are  most  easily  proved  by  the  result  of  g  14-11. 


254  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

9.  If  a  is  positive,  shew  that 

r(g)r(a  +  l)_  I    ( - )"  g  (ct  -  1 )  (g  -  2) . . .  (g  -  ?i)  J. 
r  (2  +  g)         „=o  w  !  2  +  ?i' 

10.  If.^;>Oand 

Jo 
shew  that 

''^^     X      II  x+i.2lx  +  2      Slx  +  S'^'"' 
and 

.P(.r+l)=.rP(^)-e-i. 

11.  Shew  that  if  X  >  0,  .-^  >  0,  -  ^tt  <  a  <  ^tt  ,  then 

I      i^^-i  e-A.<cosa  cos  (X;  sin  a)  dt=\-='  T  {x)  cos  a.r, 

I     ^x-ie-A<cosasin(Xi!sina)c/(;  =  X-^r(a,')sina.r.  (Euler.) 

12.  Prove  that,  if  5  >  0  then,  when  0  <  2  <  2, 

r*^  sin  6.*'  ,    ,      ,  ,,      , ,    ,  , 

I     — -^    a^  =  -|7r6^-i  cosec  (i7r2)/r  (0), 

J  0        or 

and,  when  0  <  s  <  1, 

1     ^^^^^c?.r=i7r6^-isec(|7rs)/r(2).  (Euler.) 

J  a      x^ 

13.  If  0<»i<l,  prove  that 

|J(l+.xO"-cos..c^.  =  r(.)|cos('-J-l)-^^  +  ^--...}. 

(Peterhoiise,  1895.) 

14.  By  taking  as  contour  of  integration  a  parabola  with  its  vertex  at  the  origin,  derive 

from  the  formula 

1  /■(0+) 

V(a)=---r-. (-zY'-'^e-'dz 

2i  sm  an  J  ^ 

the  result 

Y(a)  =  —. I     e-'^Kv"-'^(l+x'^)^"'[3sm{x  +  aaYccot(-x)} 

^         2  suigTT  jo  \  /     L  I 

+  sin  {x+{a  —  2)  arc  cot  ( —  .!•)}]  dx, 

the  arc  cot  denoting  an  obtuse  angle. 

(Bourguet,  Acta  Mathematica,  i.  p.  367.) 

15.  Shew  that,  if  the  real  part  of  a„  is  positive  and  ^('g^)-*-oc  ,  then 


nr-i:l^^exp(I^^W(g„)n 


is  convergent  when  m  >  2,  where  \//(*)  (z)  =  -j--  log  r  (2).  (Math.  Trip.  1907.) 


16.     Prove  that 

d  log  r  (s)       /" "  e  -  «  —  e  - ' 


jo       1 


0^2  /  (1       1—e 


da- 


■y 


=  f''{(l+«)-'-(l+a)-}'^-y 


1  x^-i \ 

~dx  —  y.  (Legendre. 


THE   GAMMA   FUNCTION  255 

1 7.  Prove  that,  when  R  (z)  >  0, 

18.  Prove  that,  for  all  values  of  z  except  negative  real  values, 

\ogT{z)  =  {z-^)logz-z  +  ^\og{2n) 

(   1      -        1  2     "        1  3      =^        1  ] 

"*"*  12 .  3  rli  (z  +  r)'^  "^3.4;.!,  {z+rf  "'■4.5,.!,  (e+r)*"^  -J 

19.  Prove  that,  when  R  {z)  >  0, 

J^logr(.)=lug.-|^'  ^^^^^{i-^+logx}. 

20.  Prove  that,  when  R  (2)  >  0, 


^-,logr(.)  =  j^  -^ 


21.    If  I       logr(«)o?^=M, 

log  2, 


shew  that 

du 

~dz 

and  deduce  from  §  12-33  that,  for  all  values  of  z  except  negative  real  values, 

?(  =  2log2-2  +  ^log27r.  (Raabe,  Crelle^xxw) 

22.  Prove  that,  for  all  values  of  z  except  negative  real  values, 

,  ^     ,      ,,,  ,  .      ,^  ,       "^    C^  dx    sin  2?i7rd? 

log  r  {z)  =  {z-\)  log z-z+\ log  (2;r)  +    2  ;— -  • 

(Bourguet*.^ 

23.  Prove  that 

B{p,  p)B{p  +  h,  pH)  =  ^^Y^-  (Binet.) 

24.  Prove  that,  when  —t<i'<t, 


„,  ,1      f"^  cosh.  (2ru)du 


25.  Prove  that,  when  g'  >  1, 

B{p,  q)+B{p  +  \,  q)  +  B{p  +  2,  j)  +  ...  =  Z?(p,  q-]). 

26.  Prove  that,  when  p  —  a  >  0, 

B{p-a,q)_  aq_  a{a+\)q{q+\) 

B{p,q)  ^p  +  q^  l.^.ip  +  qKp+q  +  iy-'- 

^l.     Prove  that 

B{p,  q)B{p  +  q,  r)  =  B{q,  r)  B  {q  +  r,  p).  (Euler.) 

28.     Shew  that 

i'    a-in-    s,-,         ^-^-^        ^r(a)r(6) 1__ 

jo*^       ^'     ""^        (^■+p)«-''       r(a  +  6)     (l+p)«p''' 

if  rt  >  0,  6  >  0,  p  >  0.  (Trinity,  1908.) 

*  This  result  is  attributed  to  Bourguet  by  Stieltjes,  Liouville's  Journal,  (4)  v.  p.  43-2. 


256  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

29.     Shew  that,  if  to>0,  n>0,  then 


/ 


1    (l  +  .^^)2»»-l(l  -,;)2»-i  _,  T(m)T{n)  _ 

_1  (I+^2)m  +  n  '  r{m  +  7l)    ' 

and  deduce  that,  when  a  is  real  and  not  an  integer  multiple  of  ^tt, 
'if     /cos  ^4-sin  d\cos2a 


/: 


/cos  ^4- sin  d\c 
Vcos  6  —  sin  ^/ 


c;^= 


-  in-  Vcos  ^  —  sin  6/  2  sin  (tt  cos^  a) ' 

(St  John's,  1904.) 

30.  Shew  that,  if  a  >  0,  ^  >  0, 

and 

'  0  (1  +0  log  ^  ^'-^"^  r  (ia)  r  (HP)-  (Kummer.) 

31 .  Shew  that,  if  a  >  0,  a  -f-  ^  >  0, 

J  0 
Deduce  that,  if  in  addition  a  +  c>0,  a  +  b4-c>0, 

•ix^-i(l-x>')(l-a;')       _     ^r(a)r(a  +  b+c) 
(1  -  .r)  (  -  log  jcj"    ■^-  "^g  r(a  +  />)r(a+c) 

32.  Shew  that,  if  a,  b,  c  be  such  that  the  integral  converges, 


-1(1-^^),       1-      rr(a)r(8)     V{a+b)T{h)\      ,  ,    ,  ,,      ,,, 


/: 


P  (l-.r'')(l-^)(l-.r<')  r(6  +  c+l)r(c+a4-l)r(a  +  6  +  l) 

Jo       (i-.t')(-log.r)        ^     ^°r(a+i)r(6+i)r(c+i)r(a+6  +  c+i) 


33.  By  the  substitution  cos^  =  l  -  2  tan  |0,  shew  that 

f       y^  mP.  (St  John',,  18%.) 

J  0  (3  -  cos  ^)*       4  ^TT 

34.  Evaluate  in  terms  of  Gamma- functions  the  integral  /  da;,  when  jo  is  a 

jo      -v 
fraction  greater  than  unity  whose  numerator  and  denominator  are  both  odd  integers. 

[Shew  that  the  integral  is  i  I     sin^ x  \--\-  2  (-)"( h I \  dxJ] 

'Jo  U'     )(=!  \x  +  n7r      x-nnj] 

(Clare,  1898.) 

35.  Shew  that 

(l-ism^:^)     2     dx  = ,    2      -.-7 rr -^r     —n   ■ 

36.  Prove  that 

log  B  (p,  ,)==log  (P±^)  +  f  ^  (1^(1^^^)  rf,.  (Euler.) 

37.  Prove  that,  if  p  >  0,  p  +  s  >  0,  then 

B(r    ^\A-^(P^P)   fii    ^(^-1)     I    ^(^-l)(^-2)(^-3)  I 

^(P,  ^  +  ^)-       2«        V  +  272^1)  +  2.4.(2;.  +  l)(2^  +  3)  +  -r    ^^^"''*-) 

38.  The  curve  r'»  =  2'"~i  a'«-cos  ra^  is  composed  of  m  equal  closed  loops.     Shew  that 
the  length  of  the  arc  of  half  of  one  of  the  loops  is 

fi^  --1 

m    ^  a  j      (^cos.r)™      dx, 
J  0 

and  hence  that  the  total  perimeter  of  the  curve  is 


THE   GAMMA   FUNCTION  257 

39.     Draw  the  straight  line  joining  the  points  ±t,  and  the  semicircle  of  |  «  |  =  1  which 
lies  on  the  right  of  this  line.     Let  C  be  the  contour  formed  by  indenting  this  figure  at 

-I,  0,  t.     By  considering  /    «p~9  (2  +  2~^)P  +  «~2rf2;,  shew  that,  if /)  +  j>  1,  g'<|, 


io    • 


COSP  +  9-2^COS(»-o)^C?(9=, ,x^„4..     ,    D/ ^v    • 

Prove  that  the  result  is  true  for  all  values  of  p  and  q  such  that  jo  +  5'  >  1. 

(Cauchy.) 

40.  If  s  is  positive  (not  necessarily  integral),  and  -^jr^.r^j7r,  shew  that 

1        r(.?  +  l)      f,        «  „  s(«-2)  ,     .      1 

COS*^= r  7 — -4t;;   \\-\ ;rCOS  2X'\-  ,        \.  ,     '.  COS  4X+...}  , 

and  draw  graphs  of  the  series  and  of  the  function  cos*  x. 

41.  Obtain  the  expansion 

cos»^-=— -rfa  +  nf C08a^p_____     cos  3ax "I 

2.-1    y^  ^|_r(j,+^«  +  i)r(is-ja+i)"^r(i«+ia+i)r(i«-fa  +  i)'^-J' 

and  find  the  values  of  x  for  which  it  is  applicable.  (Cauchy.) 

42.  Prove  that,  if  jo  >  ^, 

i^p,      ^^_    ii^pji    !_2p  +  l  r  +  2(2p  +  3)^2.4.(2p+3)(2jo  +  5)  +  -jJ   " 

(Binet.) 

43.  Shew  that,  if  ^<0,  a;  +  2>0,  then 

r(-x)   (-X     ^{-a;)(l-x)     J-^)(l-^)(2-^)         1 
T{z)     \   z   ^-      z{l+z)     ■^•■^      2(1+2)  (2  +  2)      ■^•••j 

=r(^)/o^-^-'^-^«g(^-^)Hi-0--^^^, 

and  deduce  that,  when  x+z>0, 


d 
dz 


lo„r(2  +  ^)^^   ^x{x-l)        x{x-\){x-2)_ 
■     ^     T{z)  z     '^  z{z-\-\)'^'^  z{z  +  \){z-\-2)      ■••* 

44.  Using  the  result  of  example  43,  prove  that 
logr(2  +  a)  =  logr(2)+alog2-— ^ 

a\    t{l-t){2-t)...{n-t)dt-  I    t  (l-t)  {2-t)  ...(n- t)  dt 

_    I       .'  0 j_o 

11=1  {n  +  l)z{z  +  l){z  +  2)  ...{z  +  nj  ' 

investigating  the  region  of  convergence  of  the  series. 

(Binet,  Journal  de  I' e'cole  poly  technique,  1839,  cahier  27,  p.  256.) 

45.  Prove  that,  ii  p  >  0,  q  >  0,  then 

B(p,q)=P'-'-f;~^(2n)^e-^"-'\ 
W.   M.  A.  17 


258  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XII 

where 

and  p^=p^-\-(^-\-pq. 

46.     If  r=2**/r(l-i^),      V='L^\V{\-\x\ 

and  if  the  function  Fix)  be  defined  by  the  equation 

shew  (1)  that  F  {x)  satisfies  the  equation 

F{x->r\)  =  xF{x)^-      ^ 


r(i-a?)' 

(2)  that,  for  all  positive  integral  values  of  x, 

Fix)  =  T(x), 

(3)  that  F{x)  is  analytic  for  all  finite  values  of  x, 

'1  -X 


(4)  that  i.(..)=-i-^^,  log-i-1- 

47.  Expand 

{r(a)}-i 
as  a  series  of  ascending  powers  of  a. 

(Various  evaluations  of  the  coefl&cients  in  this  expansion  have  been  given  by  Bourguet, 
Btdl.  des  Sci.  Math.  v.  (1881),  p.  43  ;  Bourguet,  Acta  Math.  ii.  (1883),  p.  261 ;  Schlbmilch, 
Zeitschrift  fur  Math.  xxv.  (1880),  pp.  35,  351.) 

48.  Prove  that  the  G^-function,  defined  by  the  equation 

(?(.+  l)  =  (2.r)i^e-*^(^+l)-i^^\n^  iO'^O"  ^""^'''^'" 
is  an  integral  function  which  satisfies  the  relations 

G{z+l)  =  T{z)0{z\     G{\)  =  \, 

(n  \)''10  (»  + 1)  =  11 .  22 .  33  ...»».  (Alexeiewsky.) 

(The  most  important  properties  of  the  G'-function  are  discussed  in  Barnes'  memoir 
QvAirterly  Journal,  xxxi.) 

49.  Shew  that 


'(2«)l , 


and  deduce  that 


50.     Shew  that 


G'iz->r\)     ,  ,       ,^    X      1  T'{z) 

^l^  =  ilog(2.)  +  i-.  +  .^^ 

log ---^ {=  I     •rrz  cot  TTzdz-zlog  {27r). 

riogr(<  +  l)(^^  =  lslog(27r)-|2(z+l)+0logr(2+l)-logG'(s-f-l). 


CHAPTER  XIII 

THE  ZETA  FUNCTION  OF  RIEMANN 

IZ'l.     Definition  of  the  Zeta-function. 

Let  s  =  cr  +  it  where  a  and  t  are  real*  ;  then  if  S  >  0,  the  series 

is  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic  functions  (§§  2*33,  3*34)  in  any 
domain  in  which  cr'^l  +  S;  and  consequently  the  series  is  an  analytic  function 
of  s  in  such  a  domain.  The  function  is  called  the  Zeta-function ;  although 
it  was  known  to  Euler  j-,  its  most  remarkable  properties  were  not  discovered 
before  RiemannJ  who  discussed  it  in  his  memoir  on  prime  numbers;  it  has 
since  proved  to  be  of  fundamental  importance,  not  only  in  the  Theory  of 
Prime  Numbers,  but  also  in  the  higher  theory  of  the  Gamma-function  and 
allied  functions. 

13'11.     The  generalised  Zetaf unction^. 

Many  of  the  properties  possessed  by  the  Zeta-function  are  particular  cases 
of  properties  possessed  by  a  more  general  function  defined,  when  a'^1  +  8, 
by  the  equation 

where  a  is  a  constant.  For  simplicity,  we  shall  suppose ||  that  0  <a^l,  and 
then  we  take  arg  {a  +  n)  =  0.     It  is  evident  that  ^(s,  1)  =  ^(s). 

*  The  letters  o-,  t  will  be  used  in  this  sense  throughout  the  chapter. 

t  Commentationes  Acad.  Sci.  Imp.  PetropoUtanae,  Vol.  ix.  (1737),  pp.  160-188. 

:;:  Ges.  Werke  (1876),  pp.  136-144. 

§  The  introduction  of  this  function  appears  to  be  due  to  Hurwitz,  Zeitschrift  fiir  Math,  itiid 
Phys.  XXVII.  (1882). 

II  When  a  has  this  range  of  values,  the  properties  of  the  function  are,  in  general,  much 
simpler  than  the  corresponding  properties  for  other  values  of  a.  The  results  of  §  13-14  are  true 
for  all  values  of  a  (negative  integer  values  excepted);  and  the  results  of  §§  13-1'2,  13-13,  13-2  are 
true  when  R  (a)  >  0. 

17—2 


260  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

13'12.     The  expression  of  ^  (s,  a)  as  an  infinite  integral. 
Since  (a  +  w)"*  T  (s)  =  I     af-'^e-^'^+''^''dx,  when  arg  x  =  0  and  a  >0  (and 

JO 

a  fortiori  when  a  ^1  +  S),  we  have,  when  <r^l  +8, 


r  (s)  ^  (5,  a^  =  lim    t   r  af-'e-"'+''^='dx 

X'-^x,  n=OJ  0 


=  lim  ^  I     ^^^--  dx  -  r  -r^^  e-(^+i+«)^c^a;[ 


CO    /pS     Ip     dX 

jv-oc  U'o    1-e-*  Jo  l-<?-^  j 

Now,  when  a;  ^  0,  e^  ^  1  +  a;,  and  so  the  modulus  of  the  second  of  these 
integrals  does  not  exceed 

f "  af-'e-^^+''^^dx  =  (N+  ay-^r  (o-  -  1), 

^0 

which  (when  a  "^1+8)  tends  to  0  as  JV  ^  oo  . 
Hence,  when  o-  ^  1  +  S  and  arg  x  =  0, 

this  formula  corresponds  in  some  respects  to  Euler's  integral  for  the  Gamma- 
function. 

13*13.     The  expression*  of  ^{s,  a)  as  a  contour  integral. 
When  o-  ^  1  +  S,  consider 


/  ^  1  —  e~^ 


l-e- 

the  contour  of  integration  being  of  Hankel's  type  (§  12'22)  and  not  containing 
the  points  ±2n7ri(n=l,  2,  8,  ...)  which  are  poles  of  the  integrand;  it  is 
supposed  (as  in  §  12"22)  that  |  arg  (— 2^)  |  ^  tt. 

It  is  legitimate  to  modify  the  contour,  precisely  as  in  §  12'22,  when^f* 
o-  ^  1  +  S ;  and  we  get 


/•(0+)  / ^\s—ip—az  foo  ^s—ip—ax 

^  /^       —  d2=  {e'^<«-^> - e--<»-i)}         ,-- ^ dx. 


Therefore 


Now  this  last  integral  is  a  one-valued  analytic  function  of  s  for  all  values 
of  s.  Hence  the  only  possible  singularities  of  ^(s,  a)  are  at  the  singularities 
of  r(l— s),  i.e.  at  the  points  1,  2,  3,  ...  and,  with  the  exception  of  these 
points,  the  integral  affords  a  representation  of  ^{s,  a)  valid  over  the  whole 

*  Given  by  Riemann  for  the  ordinary  Zeta-function. 

t  If  0-  <  1,  the  integral  taken  along  any  straight  line  up  to  the  origin  does  not  converge. 


1312-1314]  THE   ZETA   FUNCTION   OF   RIEMANN  261 

plane.  The  result  obtained  corresponds  to  Hankel's  integral  for  the  Gamma- 
function.  Also,  we  have  seen  that  f  (s,  a)  is  analytic  when  cr  ^  1  +  S,  and 
so  the  only  singularity  of  ^(s,  a)  is  at  the  point  5  =  1.  Writing  s=  1  in  the 
integral,  we  get 

1      r(0+)      g-az 

which  is  the  residue  at  £;  =  0  of  the  integrand,  and  this  residue  is  1. 

Hence  lim  ^^^ — :  =  —  1. 

^^ir(l-5) 

Since  F  (1  —  s)  has  a  single  pole  at  5  =  1  with  residue  —  1,  it  follows  that 
the  only  singularity  of  ^{s,  a)  is  a  simple  pole  with  residue  +  1  at  «  =  1. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  when  R  (s)  >  0, 


r(s)  jo 


.8-1 

dx. 


e^  +  l 
Example  2.     Shew  that,  when  It  (s)  >  1, 

(20 -I) as) = as,  i) 

2'     f^  x»-^e^ 


T{s)  J  0    e^  -  1 
Example  3.     Shew  that 


/: 


dx. 


2i-»r(i-g)   /•(0+) (_2)«-i 

2iri{2^-'-l)  J  ^        e'  +  l    ' 
where  the  contour  does  not  inchide  any  of  the  points  ±7ri,  ±3Tri,  ±5Tri, 


13'14.     Values  of  ^{s,  a)  for  special  values  of  s. 

In  the  special  case  when  s  is  an  integer  (positive  or  negative),  -^- — ~ — 
is  a  one- valued  function  of  2'.     We  may  consequently  apply  Cauchy's  theorem, 

1       /•(0+)  (■_  ^y-ig-az 

so  that  ^ — ;  I  i"^^ — ^     ^^  ^s  ^h®  residue  of  the  integrand  at  0  =  0,  that 

/_\«— ig— a^ 

is  to  say,  it  is  the  coefficient  of  z~^  in  \ . 

•^  1  —  e~2 

To  obtain  this  coefficient  we  differentiate  the  expansion  (§  7*2) 

e-az_l         ^    (-)«<^„(«)0« 

—  z ^    ^ 

e-^-1       „  =  i  // ! 

term-by-term  with  regard  to  a,  where  (f)n{a)  denotes  the  Bernoullian  poly- 
nomial. 

(This  is  obviously  legitimate,  by  §  4"7,  when  \z\<2Tr,  since     _^—      can  be  expanded 

into  a  power  series  in  z  uniformly  convergent  with  respect  to  a.) 

Then  ^-^-=  I  (-il*!>:)i" 

e-^  —  1     «  =  i  n\ 


262  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

Therefore  if  s  is  zero  or  a  negative  integer  (=  —  m),  we  have 

f  (-  m,a)  =  -  (/)V2  {a)l[{m  +  1)  (m  +  2)}. 
In  the  special  case  when  a  =  1,  if  5  =  — m,  then  f  (5)  is  the  coefficient 
of  2;^~«  in  the  expansion  of  -   L     -i      • 
Hence,  by  §  7-2, 

r(-2m)  =  0,     r(l-2m)  =  (-)-5J(2m)      (m  =  1,  2,  3, ...), 

TAese  equations  give  the  value  of  ^(s)  when  s  is  a  negative  integer  or  zero. 
13'15.     The  formula*  of  Hurwitz  for  ^(s,  a)  when  a<0. 

Consider  —  - — ;  /    — ^^^^  dz  taken  round  a  contour  G  consisting  of 

a  (large)  circle  of  radius  (2iV+l)7r,  (N  an  integer),  starting  at  the  point 
(2iV+  l)7r  and  encircling  the  origin  in  the  positive  direction,  arg  (—z)  being 
zero  at  ^  =  -  (2iV  +  1)  tt. 

In  the  region  between  C  and  the  contour  (2N7r  +  tt  ;  0  +),  of  which  the 
contour  of  §13'13  is  the  limiting  form,  (— ^)*~^e~"^(l  —  e~^)~^  is  analytic  and 
one-valued  except  at  the  simple  poles  +  27ri,  ±  Atiri, . . . ,  +  2i\^7ri. 

Hence 

1    r  (    .).-..-.^     _  1    r<->     (-.)-.- ^^ ^  I  ■ 

where  i?„,  R^  are  the  residues  of  the  integrand  at  2^t7^^,  —  Irnri  respectively. 
Where  —  z=  27nre~'^^\  the  residue  is 

(2/i7r)'-^e-^''^('-l)e-2«'»'^\ 

and  hence  Rn  +  Rn  =  {2mrf-'^  2  sin  f  ^ -stt  +  ^iraii) . 

Hence 

1    /-(o-^)       (-4^-ie-«^ 


27rij(2jv+ij7r      1  — e 

_2sin-^S7r  E.  cos(27ran)      2  cos  ^ sir  ^  sin(27rcm) 
~  727r)i-^   ,,ri       ^^^^^        "^    (27r)i-« "  „=i       ^^^ 

;  1    n-zy-^e--^ 

^27riJa     l-e-^      '^'- 

Now,  since  0<a^l,  it  is  easy  to  see  that  we  can  find  a  number  K 
independent  of  N  such  that  \  e~"^  (1  —  e~^')~'^  j  <  K  when  5;  is  on  C. 

*  Zeitschriftfiir  Math,  und  Phys.  xxvii.  (1882),  p.  95. 


1 31 5-13-2]  THE  ZETA   FUNCTION   OF  RIEMANN  268 

Hence 

<ir{(2iV+l)7r|'^e-l*" 
-^0  as,  iV  ^  00  if  o-  <  0. 
Making  iV  -*-  x  ,  we  obtain  the  result  of  Hurwitz  that,  if  o-  <  0, 

-.,       .      2r  (!-*)(.    (\      \  :?,  cos(27ran)  l\      \  5.  sin(27raw)) 

each  of  these  series  being  convergent. 

13*151.     Riemamis  relation  between  ^(s)  and  ^(1  — s). 
If  we  write  a  =  1  in  the  formula  of  Hurwitz  given  in  §  13"15,  and  employ 
§  12*14,  we  get  the  remarkable  result,  due  to  Riemann,  that 

2i-«r(s)  ^(s)cos  Qstt]  =  7r«^(l  -s). 

Since  both  sides  of  this  equation  are  analytic  functions  of  s,  save  for  isolated 
values  of  s  at  which  they  have  poles,  this  equation,  proved  when  a  <  0, 
persists  (by  §  5*5)  for  all  values  of  s  save  those  isolated  values. 

Example  1.     If  m  be  a  positive  integer,  shew  that 

C  (2m)  =  22'"  - 1 TT^*"  BJi2m) ! . 

Example  2.     Shew  that  r  (|«)  n'  **  f  («)  is  unaltered  by  replacing  s  by  1  -  s. 

(Riemann.) 

Example  3. .  Deduce  from  Riemann's  relation  that  the  zeros  of  f  (s)  at  —  2,  —  4,  —  6, . . . 
are  zeros  of  the  first  order. 

13*2.     Hermite's*  formula  for  ^{s,  a). 

Let  us  apply  the  result  of  example  7  of  Chapter  vii  (p.  145)  to  the 
function  <f)  (z)  =  (a  +  z)~^,  where  arg  (a  +  z)  has  its  principal  value. 

Define  the  function  q  {x,  y)  by  the  equation 

q  {x,  y)  =  2i  '^^^  "^  ^  "^  *2^^~'  -{a  +  x-  iy)-'] 

=  -  {(a  +  xy  +  y-]  " *^  sin  \s  arc  tan   -—  [ . 

\  V  \  v\ 

Sincef    arc  tan     "^       does  not  exceed  the  smaller  of  A-tt  and   -         ,  we 
X  -\-  a  •  x  +  a 


have 


\q(x,y)\^{(a  +  xy  +  yf^-^^''\y-'\smhi^^'n-\s\\, 

k(^,2/)kl(«  +  ^)^  +  .y1~^"   jjsinh^lj. 

*  Annali  di  Matematica,  ser.  in.  t.  v.  (1901). 

t  If  ^  >  0,  arc  tan  ?=  I     ,  — -  <         ,       . ,;  and  arc  tan  ?  <  |    dt. 
^     Ji)  l  +  £-      jo   1  +  t-  jo 


264  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

Using  the  first  result  when  \y\>  a  and  the  second  when  \y\<a  it  is 

evident  that,  if  o-  >  0,  1     q  {x,  y)  {e^^'v  —  1)~^  dy  is  convergent  when  x'^Q  and 

J  a 

tends  to  0  as  «  •-*-  00  ;  also  I    (a  +  x)~^  dx  converges  if  o-  >  1. 

Hence,  if  o-  >  1,  it  is  legitimate  to  make  x^-*'qc  in  the  result  contained  in 
the  example  cited ;  and  we  have 

^  {s,  a)  =  1  a-«  +  r  (a  +  x)-'  dx+2J    {a^  +  y')  -  ^^  jsin  (s  arc  tan  ^^1  ~.~^—  . 
So 

Us,a)  =  la-^  +  ^^  +  2J\a^  +  yr'~'{^^{s^rctanf^^^^^ 

This  is  Hermite's  formula*;  using  the  results  that,  ify'^0, 

arc  tan  2//a  ^  2//a       (y<-a7r\,  arc  tan  2//a  <  -  tt       (y  >  ^air] , 

we  see  that  the  integral  involved  in  the  formula  converges  for  all  values  of  s. 
Further,  the  integral  defines  an  analytic  function  of  s  for  all  values  of  s. 

To  prove  this,  it  is  sufficient  (§  5-31)  to  shew  that  the  integral  obtained  by  diflferentiating 
under  the  sign  of  integration  converges  uniformly  ;  that  is  to  say  we  have  to  prove  that 


j^   ^-^log{a'+f){a'+f)    ^«sin(sarctan|)J-5^^ 


converges  uniformly  with  respect  to  s  in  any  domain  of  values  of  s.     Now  when  |  s  |  :^  A, 
where  A  is  any  positive  number,  we  have 

{a?  +  y2)  -  i«  arc  tan  ^  cos  is  arc  tan  -  )    <  (a^  +  ?/2)*^  -^  cosh  (^ttA)  ; 
I  "^  a        \  a)  \  ''         a  ^~      ' 

suice  -   I      (a^  +  iAf    ^^ — 

a  Jo    ^        -^  '     p}'y-\ 

converges,  the  second  integi-al  converges  uniformly  by  §  4'431  (I). 

By  dividing  the  path  of  integration  of  the  first  integral  into  two   parts   (0,  \na), 
(Jn-(X,  00 )  and  using  the  results 

sin  (  s  arc  tan  -  )    <  sinh  —  , 


sin  I  s  arc  tan  -  )    <  sinh  in-A 
aj  \  a  '  \  aj  \ 

in  the  respective  parts,  we  can  similarly  shew  that  the  first  integral  converges  uniformly. 

Consequently  Hermite's  formula  is  valid  (§  5"5)  for  all  values  of  s,  and 
it  is  legitimate  to  differentiate  under  the  sign  of  integration,  and  the 
differentiated  integral  is  a  continuous  function  of  s. 

*  The  corresponding  formula  when  a  =  l  had  been  previously  given  by  Jensen. 


N. 


13-21,  13-3]  THE   ZETA    FUNCTION   OF   RIEMANN  265 

13'21.     Deductions  from  Hermite's  formula. 
Writing  s  =  0  in  Hermite's  formula,  we  see  that 

f(0,a)  =  i-a. 

Making  s-*-l,from  the  uniformity  of  convergence  of  the  integral  involved 
in  Hermite's  formula  we  see  that 

Hence,  by  the  example  of  §  12*32,  we  have 

1    )         T'(a) 


Further,  differentiating*  the  formula  for  ^{s,  a)  and  then  making  5-^0, 
we  get 

+  2  1      \-^\og(a^  +  y'').{a''  +  y-)~^^sm(sarctan^\ 

+  (a^  +  v^)~^^  arc  tan  ^  cos  f  s  arc  tan  ^H    „    ^  , 

/        i\  ,  ,  o  /*°°  9,rc  tan  (;?//«)  , 

=  ^a--jloga-a+2J^       ^^^^  ^^   Uy. 

Hence,  by  §  12-32, 

|^^(.,a)|^^^^  =  logr(a)-^log(27r). 

These  results  had  previously  been  obtained  in  a  different  manner  by 
Lerchf. 

Corollary.        lim  |  ^  (s)  -  -^  1  =  7,     ^'  (0)  =  -  ^  log  27r. 

13"3.     Euler's  product  for  ^(s). 

Let  o-  ^  1  +  8 ;  and  let  2,  3,  5,  ...  /j  ...  be  the  prime  numbers  in  order. 
Then,  subtracting  the  series  for  2~*  ^(s)  from  the  series  for  ^  (s),  we  get 

^(.).(l-2-0  =  ^^  +  ^,+J,+  ^,  +  ..., 

*  This  was  justified  in  §  13-2. 

t  The  formula  for  f  (s,  a)  from  which  Lerch  derived  these  results  is  given  in  a  memoir 
published  by  the  Academy  of  Sciences  of  Prague.  A  summary  of  his  memoir  is  contained  in 
the  Jahrbuch  der  Math.  1893-1894,  p.  484. 


266  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

all  the  terms  of  Xn~^  for  which  w  is  a  multiple  of  2  being  omitted ;  then  in 
like  manner 

r  (.).(! -2-)  (1-3-)=^+!  +  ^+..., 

all  the  terms  for  which  w  is  a  multiple  of  2  or  3  being  omitted ;  and  so  on ; 
so  that 

f  (s)  .  (1  -  2-*)  (1  -  3-*)  ...  (1  -p-')=l  +  Sn-\ 

the  '  denoting  that  only  those  values  of  n  (greater  than  p)  which  are  prime 
to  2,  3,  ... p  occur  in  the  summation. 

CO 

Now*  |2'n-«j^2'w~^~^<     %     n-^-^  ^0  as  p^oo. 

Therefore  if  a-  "^  1  +  B,  the  product  ^(s)II  (1  —  p~^)  converges  to  1,  where 

p 
the  number  p  assumes  the  prime  values  2,  3,  5,  ...  only. 

But  the  product  H  (1  —  p~*)  converges  when  <r  ^  1  +  S,  for  it  consists  of 
p 

00 

some  of  the  factors  of  the  absolutely  convergent  product  IT  (1  —  n~^). 

M  =  2 

Consequently  we  infer  that  f  (s)  has  no  zeros  at  which  cr  ^  1  +  8 ;  for  if 

it  had  any  such  zeros,  IT  (1  -  p~^)  would  not  converge  at  them. 

p 

Therefore,  if  o-  ^  1  +  S, 

This  is  Euler's  result. 

IS'Sl.     Riemanns  hypothesis  concerning  the  zeros  of  f  (s). 
It  has  just  been  proved  that  ^{s)  has  no  zeros  at  which  cr  >  1. 
From  the  formula  (§  13']  51) 

r(5)=2*-i{r(s)}-^secfj57r)r(l-«)    "  ^ 


,2 
it  is  now  apparent  that  the  only  zeros  of  ^(s)  for  which  o-  <  0  are  the  zeros 

of  ■[r(s)|~^sec  [-  stt)  ,  i.e.  the  points  s  =  —  2,  —  4,  — 


^2 

Hence  all  the  zeros  of  ^(s)  except  those  at  -2,-4,  ...  lie  in  that  strip  of 
the  domain  of  the  complex  variable  s  which  is  defined  by  0  ^  o-  ^  1. 

It  was  conjectured  by  Riemann,  bub  it  has  not  yet  been  proved,  that  all 

the  zeros  of  ^(s)  in  this  strip  lie  on  the  line  o"  =  «;  while  it  has  quite  recently 

been  proved  by  Hardy  f  that  an  infinity  of  zeros  of  ^(s)  actually  lie  on  cr  =  -  . 

It  is  highly  probable  that  Riemarm's  conjecture  is  correct,  and  the  proof  of 
it  would  have  far-reaching  consequences  in  the  theory  of  Prime  Numbers. 

*  The  first  term  of  S'  starts  with  the  prime  next  greater  than  i). 
t  Comptes  Rendus,  t.  clviii.  (1914),  p.  1012. 


13'31,  13-4]  THE  ZETA   FUNCTION   OF   RIEMANN  267 

13*4.     Riemann's  integral  for  ^(s). 
It  is  easy  to  see  that,  if  o-  >  0, 

Hence,  when  <r>  0, 

^{s)r(ls]'7r-^'=  lim   f  f  e-'^'^'^x^'-'^ dx. 

\^    /  JV-^Qo  J  0    n  =  l 

00 

Now,  if  «•(«!)=  S  e""^""^,  since,  by  example  17  of  Chapter  vi  (p.  124), 
1  +  2'bt(x)  =  x~^  {1  +  2-57  (l/x)},     we     have     lim  x^ia  (x)  =  I;     and     hence 

a:-*"0  /:_ 

/•QO 

I     cr(a;)a;^*~-'^(Zic  converges  when  o- >  1. 

Jo 

Consequently/,  if  a  >  2, 
^{s)r(ls)7r~^'=  lim   \r  ny(x)x^'-'^ds-r      t     e' ''"'''' x^'-'^  dxl  . 

\^    J  JV"-*oo   L^O  Jo    n=N+-i  J 

Now,  as  in  §  13'12,  the  modulus  of  the  last  integral  does  not  exceed 


00  ,-      ex,  ._,■>,.  r<x>  g-(-N'+l)^TX^^(r-l 


0    U=iv+i  J  Jo      i-e    (^  +  ^)^^ 

Jo 

^  0  as  iV  ^  00  ,  since  o-  >  2. 
Hence,  when  cr  >  2, 

=  n_l  +  la;-^+a;-ii!r(l/a;)U^'-^fZa;+r'sr(a;)a;*^-l(^a; 
=  --  +  -^  +  f  a;*w(^)a^-*'  +  ^  (--]  dx+r^(x)xi'-\dx. 

S  S  —    1  J  oc  \        ^'J  J  1 

Consequently 

Now  the  integral  on  the  right  represents  an  analytic  function  of  s  for  all 
values  of  s,  by  §  5'32,  since  on  the  path  of  integration 

•GT  (x)  <  e-"""  t  e-"''^^  <  e-"""  (1  -  e-'^)-^ 


M  =  0 


Consequently,  by  §  5"5,  the  above  equation,  proved  when  a-  >  2,  persists  for 
all  values  of  s. 


268  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

If  now  we  put 

we  have 

no  =  2  ~  (^^  +  4)  I     ^~ ^  ^  («)  COS  (-  ^  log  x]  dx. 
Since  I     x~ 'i  zr  {x)  i-Xog  x  y    cos  f  -  ^  log  a;  +  -  n-n- j  cZa? 

satisfies  the  test  of  §  4*44  corollary,  Ave  may  differentiate  any  number  of  times 
under  the  sign  of  integration,  and  then  put  ^  =  0.  Hence,  by  Taylor's 
theorem,  we  have  for  all  values*  of  t 

by  considering  the  last  integral  a^^  is  obviously  real. 
This  result  is  fundamental  in  Riemann's  researches. 
13'5.     Inequalities  satisfied  by  ^  {s,  a)  when  a  >  0. 

We  shall  now  investigate  the  behaviour  of  ^  (s,  a)  as  ^  -*-  +  cx) ,  for  given  values  of  a. 
When  o-  >  1,  it  is  easy  to  see  that,  if  JV  be  any  integer, 

Us,  ■')=i„CH-")--(i_,)(],^^).,.-Jy„W 

where 

. ,  X  j_  r      1 1     ]        1 

•^"^^     1-s  t(?i  +  l +«)«-!      (?i  +  a)»-ij      (n  +  l  +  ay 

/""  +  !      u-n 
=  s  I  , —-r-.au. 


■w-  ,  fn  +  l  ■)/ —Qi 

Isow,  when  a>0,  \f„ {s)\^\s\  ,.  du 

J  n        (u  +  a) 


(u  +  a) 
'"  +  1         du 


=  \s\{n  +  a)-^~'^. 

CO 

Therefore  the   series  2  /„  (s)  is  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic  functions 

cc 

when  cr  >  0  ;  so  that    2    f^  (s)  is  an  analytic  function  when  o-  >  0  ;  and  consequently,  by 
§  5-5,  the  function  ^{s,  a)  may  be  defined  when  o-  >  0  by  the  series 

C{s,a)=    2    («  +  ,,)--  --—-^—— -J-   i    /„(.). 
11=0  [I  —  s)  {jy -t  a)"         n=N 

Now  let  [t]  be  the  greatest  integer  in  |  f  |  ;  and  take  N'=[t].     Then 

[t] 
|C(s,  «)|^   2    |(«  +  n)-«|  +  !{(l-s)-i(W  +  «y-1l+     2    \s\{n  +  a)-''~'^ 

«=0  n=[t] 

[t]  ^ 

<    2    {a  +  n)-''  +  \t\-^([t]  +  a)^-''  +  \s\    2    {n  +  a)-''-\ 

«  =  0  „=[t] 

*  In   this  particular  piece  of  analysis  it  is  convenient  to  regard  «  as  a  complex  variable, 
defined  by  the  equation  s  =  ^  +  it;  and  then  f  (<)  is  an  integral  function  of  t. 


13-5,  13-51]  THE   ZETA   FUNCTION   OF   RIEMANN  269 

Using  the  Maclaurin-Cauchy  sum  formula  (§  4*43),  we  get 

\C{s,a)\<a-''+(^'\a+x)-''dx'+\t\-^{[t]  +  a)^-''+\8\  I        (x  +  a)-"-'^ dx. 
Jo  J  [t]-i 

Now  when  S  ^  o-  <  1  -  8  where  S  >  0,  we  have 

Hence  ^{s,a)  =  0{\t  |^~*^),  the  constant  implied  in  the  symbol  0  being  independent  of  s. 
But,  when  1  —  8<o-^l+S,  we  have 

\C{s,a)\  =  0{\t\}-'')-\-\     {a+xydx 

<0{\t\^-'')  +  {a^-''  +  {a  +  tf-''}  \^'\a+x)-'^dx, 

J  0 

since  {a  +  x)~'^ ^a^'" {a-\-x)-'^  when  o-^l,  and  {a  +  x)'"^ ■^{a  +  {t]f~'^ {a+xy^  when 
«r^  1,  and  so 

Wheno-^l  +  S, 

\C{s,a)\^a-''+  2  (a  +  n)-i-«  =  0(l). 

n=l 

13*51.     Inequalities  satisfied  by  ( {s,  a)  when  tr  ^  0. 

We  next  obtain   inequaUties  of  a   similar  nature   when  o-^S.     In  the  case  of  the 
function  f  (s)  we  use  Riemann's  relation 

f  (s)  =  2«  ,r»-i  r  (1  -  s)  t(l  -  s)sin  (^  stt). 

Now  when  tr  <  1  -  8,  we  have,  by  §  12  "33, 

r  (1  -  5)  =  0  {e^ -«) log (1  -»)-(! -s)j 
and  so 

f(«)  =  0[exp{|7r|«|4-(|-o--z01ogl  1 -s  |  +  i  arctan  i;/(l -o-)}]  f  (1 -s). 

Since  arc  tan^/(l  -cr)=  ±-|7r+0  (^~*),  according  as  t  is  positive  or  negative,  we  see,  from 
the  results  already  obtained  for  ({s,  a),  that 

In  the  case  of  the  function  ^(s,  a),  we  have  to  use  the  formula  of  Hurwitz  (§  13'15) 
to  obtain  the  generalisation  of  this  result  ;  we  have,  when  o-  <  0, 

C  {s,  a)=-i  (2,r)«-i  r  (1  -  .)  [e**-"  ^  (1 "«)  "  ^"**"^  C-a  (1  -  «)] 
where  f„(l_s)=   2     -j-. 

Hence  (i  _  e^'*")  ^^  ( x  _  5)  =  e27r»a  _^   ^  g2«,r;a  j-^^g  - 1  _  (^^  _  j  )8  - 1] 

+  {s-\)      2      e^'*^*  ["      u»-^d^^, 

since  the  series  on  the  right  is  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic  functions 
whenever  a-  ^  1  -  S,  this  equation  gives  the  continuation  of  ^„  (1  -  s)  over  the  range 
O^o-^l  —  8;  so  that,  whenever  o-  ^  1  —  8,  we  have 

!sin7raf„(l-s)|$l+   2   {/i''~^  +  ('/i-l)''~'}  +  l  s-1  I      2       I        xi'-'^du. 

n='Z  n~N+l  J  n-1 


270  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

Taking  N'=[i],  we  obtain,  as  in  §  13"5, 

=  0(l<riog|i|)    (-S^o-<8). 
And  obviously 

Cail-S)  =  0{l)  (0-<-S). 

Consequently,  whether  a  is  unity  or  not,  we  have  the  results 

C{s,a)  =  Oi\t\^--'')  (<r<8) 

=  0(1^!*)  (S^o-^l-S) 

=  0(|«|*log|  ;|)    (-8^0-^S). 

We  may  combine  these  results  and  those  of  §  13-5,  into  the  single  formula 

C{s,a)=0{\tr^''hog\t\) 
where* 

r(o-)  =  -^-o-,  (o-=$0);    r(cr)  =  |,  (O^o-^i);  t{(t)  =  1-<t,  (^<o-^1)  ;  t(o-)  =  0,  (<r^I); 

and  the  log  1 1  j  may  be  suppressed  except  when  -  S  ^  w  ^  8  or  when  1— S^cr^l  +  S. 

13'6.     The  asymptotic  expansion  of  log  F  (z  +  a). 
From  §  12'1  example  3,  it  follows  that 

a'»=ilV        a  +  n)  j       r(z  +  a) 

Now,  the  principal  values  of  the  logarithms  being  taken, 


log 


n  ifi+_^^,-./4=  i  rf---  U  i  (-1^-.-^ 


00    / \m—i  ^m 

,„ti     m     a"""' 
If  I  2;  ]  <  a,  the  double  series  is  absolutely  convergent  since 

a\z\         ,      ( ^         \z\  \        \z 
-  log    1  -  -^-^    + 


n=\  \j'^  (ci  +  n)         '^  \        a  +  nj      a  +  n 
converges. 

Consequently 

,      e-y^r(a)     z        ^.         az  ^    (-)'""' 

_  X   r       7r^« 
Now  consider  ^ — .  I        .  - —   tl(s,  a)  ds,  the  contour  of  integration  beins' 

similar  to  that  of  §  12'22  enclosing  the  points  s  =  2,  3,  4,   ...  but  not   the 
points  1,  0,  —1,  —2,  ...;  the  residue  of  the  integrand  at  s  =  w  (?w  ^  2)  is 

^m,  ^77i^  a^  •  and  since,  as  o-  —  x   (where  s  =  a  +  it),  ^{s,  a)=  0  (1),  the 

integral  converges  if  j0;<  1. 

*  It  can  be  proved  that  r  {<t)  may  be  taken  to  be  i  (1  -  <r)  when  0  -^  cr^  1.     See  Landau,  Prim- 
zahleii,  §  237. 


13*6]  THE  ZETA   FUNCTION  OF  BIEMANN  271 

Consequently 

log  j^, — -=^:  =  -  -  S    —7--^  V  -  o— .      — r  -      ^{s,  a)  ds. 

Hence 

-         r(a)  r{a)        1     f       7rg« 

log  _  ,— ^^  =  —  ^  „  ,  ,  —  TT — ;  I   — ^ c  (s,  a)  rt5. 

^  r  (^^  +  a)  r  (a)      27rt  J  ^  *  sm  tt*  *  ^       ^ 

Now  let  Z)  be  a  semi-circle  of  (large)  radius  N  with  centre  at  s  =  f ,  the 
semi-circle  lying  on  the  right  of  the  line  o-  =  |.  On  this  semi-circle 
f(5,  a)  =0(1),  |^*[  =  |^|<^e-^'*'"»^  and  so  the  integrand  is*  0  {|^ j<'e-''l^i-^"'"K^}. 
Hence  if  |  ^  |  <  1  and  —  tt  -f-  S  ^  arg  2^  ^  tt  —  8,  where  h  is  positive,  the  integrand 
is  0(1 2^  {""e"*  1*^1),  and  hence 

J  2)  S  sm  7r5 
as  iV  -»-  00  .     It  follows  at  once  that,  if  |  arg  z\-^'k  —  Z  and  |  2^  |  <  1, 

log  T^  r^^^\  =  —  z  -^-,-  i  +  ^ — ;  — -. t(s,  a)  ds. 

But  this  integral  defines  an  analytic  function  of  z  for  all  values  of  |  ^^  |  if 

I  arg z\^7r  —  S. 

Hence,  by  §  5*5,  the  above  equation,  proved  when  I  ^  |  <  1,  persists  for  all 
values  of  1 2^  I  when  i  arg  ^  j  ^  tt  —  S. 

Now  consider  I  — -. f  (s,  a)  ds,  where  n  is  a  fixed  integer  and 

R  is  going  to  tend  to  infinity.  By  §  13*51,  the  integrand  is  0  [z'^e~^^'^  R''^'^'>\ 
where  —n  --:$cr^-;  and  hence  if  the  upper  signs  be  taken,  or  if  the  lower 
signs  be  taken,  the  integral  tends  to  zero  as  i^  -*-  00 . 

Therefore,  by  Cauchy's  theorem, 

where  R^  is  the  residue  of  the  integrand  at  s  =  —  m. 
Now,  on  the  new  path  of  integration 

'^^'     ^(5,  a)i<ii:^-"-^e-^l"^(-"-i)U|, 

.S  sm  TTS 

where  K  is  independent  of  z  and  t,  and  t(o-)  is  the  function  defined  in 
§  13*51. 

*  The  constants  implied  in  the  symbol  0  are  independent  of  s  and  z  throughout. 


272  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

rcc 

Consequently,  since  I       e  ~  ^  I  ^ '  I  ^  |  ^  ( "  "  "  4)  cZ^  converges,  we  have 

J    —  CO 

when  I  ^  I  is  large. 

Now,  when  m   is  a  positive  integer,  Rm  =   ~ ^-^^ '    ^    and  so 

—  m  ' 

by  §13-14,  R^  =  y-l—^^^^±^     where  </>,„' (a)  denotes  the  derivate  of 
Bernoulli's  polynomial. 

Also  Ro  is  the  residue  at  s  =  0  of 


1/.     .     TT^S^ 

s 


l  +  '^+---)(l+slog^+...)||-a  +  <(0,  a)+...l, 
and  so  R^  =  i-^  —  a]  log  z  +  ^'  (0,  a) 

=  (^  -  «)  log  ^  +  log  r  (a)  -  I  log  (27r), 
by  §13-21. 

And,  using  §13-21,  R^i  is  the  residue*  at  >Sf=  0  of 

1 /-.      c*      o.         N^      '^''Sf2  N      .,       ^.  /I      F(a)  N 

__(l_S  +  S=-...)^l  +  ^ +  ..,). (l+Slog.+  ...)(g--piJ  +  ...). 

Hence  jR_i  =  —  ^  log  2^  +  ^  t-,  7^  +  z. 

1  (a) 

Consequently,  finally,  if  |  arg z\  ^tt  —  B  and  | ^ |  is  large, 
log  r {z  +  a)  =  iz  +  a  —  ~]  log  z  —  z  +  ~  log(27r) 

mti  m  (77i  +  1)  (m  +  2)  ^^«  ^      '^  ^• 

In  the  special  case  when  a=l,  this  reduces  to  the  formula  found 
previously  in  §12-33  for  a  more  restricted  range  of  values  of  arg^. 

The  asymptotic  expansion  just  obtained  is  valid  when  a  is  not  restricted 
by  the  inequality  0  <  a  ^  1 ;  but  the  investigation  of  it  involves  the  rather 
more  elaborate  methods  which  are  necessary  for  obtaining  inequalities  satisfied 
by  ^(s,  a)  when  a  does  not  satisfy  the  inequality  0<  a  ^  1.  But  if,  in  the 
formula  just  obtained,  we  write  a  =  1  and  then  put  z  +  a  for  z,  it  is  easily 
seen  that,  when  |  arg  (z  +  a,)  [  ^^  tt  —  8,  we  have 

\ogr{z  +  a+l)  =  (z  +  a+l^  log  {2  +  a)-z-a  +  l  log  (27r)  +  0  (1) ; 

*   Writing  s  — S  +  1. 


13-6]  THE   ZETA   FUNCTION   OF   RIEMANN  273 

subtracting  log  (z  +  a)  from  each  side,  we  easily  see  that  when  both 

I  arg  (z  +  a)\^7r  —  B  and  |  arg  ^  |  :$  tt  —  3, 
we  have  the  asymptotic  formula 

\ogr{z  +  a)=(^z  +  a-^\ogz-z  +  l  log  (27r)  +  o  (1), 

where  the  expression  which  is  o  (1)  tends  to  zero  as  \z\-*  cc . 

REFERENCES. 
G.  F,  B.  RiEMANN,  Oes.    Werke,  pp.  145-155. 
E.  G.  H.  Landau,  Handhuch  der  Primzahlen. 
E.  L.  LiNDELOF,  Le  Calcul  des  Residus,  Chap.  I  v. 
E.  W.  Barnes,  Messenger  of  Mathematics,  Vol.  xxix.  (1899),  pp.  64-128. 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that 

(2«- 1)  C(«)  =  ^^'  +  2  IJ  (i+y^)"*' sin  (arc  tan  2y)  ^-2^^^- . 

(Jensen.) 

2.  Shew  that 

98-1  f"  ,  dy 

CW  =  — T-2»        (l+/)-i*sm(arctany)  — ^. 
s-i.         J  0  e"^  + 1 

(Jensen.) 

3.  Discuss  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  log  O  {z  +  a),  (Chapter  xii,  example  48)  by 
aid  of  the  generalised  Zeta-function.  (Barnes.) 


4.     Shew  that,  if  (r>  1, 


log  C(s)  =  '2  I     — — , 


the  summation  extending  over  the  prime  numbers  p  =  2,  3,  5,  ....  (Dirichlet.) 

5.  Shew  that,  if  a-  >  1, 

C(«)     »=i  ^^'  ' 

where  A  {n)=0  when  71  is  not  a  power  of  a  prime,  and  A  (»)=log^  when  w  is  a  power  of  a 
prime  p. 

6.  Prove  that 

e-^—^^^x^-^dx. 


-'0(1  +  4^0 


(Lerch,  Krakow  Itozprawy*,  11.) 


*  See  the  Jahrbuch  iiber  die  Fortschritte  der  Math.  1893-1894,  p.  482. 
W.  M.   A.  18 


274  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIII 

7.     If 


where  |  .r  |  <  1 ,  and  the  real  part  of  s  is  positive,  shew  that 

,  ,       ,        1      /"°°  xz*~'^dz 

(h  (s,  X)  =  — T-,     I  

and,  if  s  <  1, 


hm  (1  -  07)1  - « 0  (s,  ^)  =  r  (1  -  s). 

(Appell,  Coinptes  Rendus,  lxxxvii.) 


8.     If  .V,  a,  and  s  be  real,  and  0  <  a  <  1,  and  s  >  1,  and  if 


„2mnx 


shew  that 


<^(^,«.«)=^J^  V 


and 


^         j-     e  '(p^-a,x,s)  ^ 

rf)  (a\  a,  I  ~s)  =  7~-!  i  t 


(Lerch,  Acta  Mathematica,  xi.) 


f     ^ 


CHAPTER  XIV 

THE   HYPERGEOMETEIC   FUNCTION 

14'1.     The  hypergeometric  series. 

We  have  already  (§  2*38)  considered  the  hypergeometric  series* 

a.b        a(a  +  l)b(b  +  l)^      a(a  +  l)(a+2)b(b+l){b  +  2)  ^ 
"^l.c    "^     1.2.c(c+l)  1.2.3.c(c  +  l)(c  +  2)  '^ '" 

from  the  point  of  view  of  its  convergence.     It  follows  from  §  2'38  and  §  5*3 
that  the  series  defines  a  function  which  is  analytic  when  |  ^  |  <  1. 

It  will  appear  later  (§  14"53)  that  this  function  has  a  branch  point  at  ^  =  1 
and  that  if  a  cut  f  (i.e.  an  impassable  barrier)  is  made  from  +  1  to  +  oo  along 
the  real  axis,  the  function  is  analytic  and  one-valued  throughout  the  cut 
plane.     The  function  will  be  denoted  by  F  {a,  b;  c;  z). 

Many  important  functions  employed  in  Analysis  can  be  expressed  by 
means  of  hypergeometric  functions.     Thus  + 

\og{l+z)  =  zF{l,\-2;-z), 
'e'=  lim  F{l,B;  l;zll3). 


'    Example.     Shew  that 
d 

14"11.     The  value^  of  F(a,  b;  c;  1)  when  R{c  —  a  —  b)  >0. 


^  F{a,h;  c;  2)  =  — i^(a  +  l,  6  +  1 ;  c  +  1;  z). 


The  reader  will  easily  verify,  by  considering  the  coefficients  of  ;»"  in  the 

*  The  name  was  given  by  Wallis  in  1G55. 

t  The  plane  of  the  variable  z  is  said  to  be  cut  along  a  curve  when  it  is  convenient  to  consider 
only  such  variations  in  z  which  do  not  involve  a  passage  across  the  curve  in  question  ;  so  that 
the  cut  may  be  regarded  as  an  impassable  barrier. 

X  It  will  be  a  good  exercise  for  the  reader  to  construct  a  rigorous  proof  of  the  third  of  these 
results. 

§  This  analysis  is  due  to  Gauss.  A  method  more  easy  to  remember  but  more  difficult 
to  justify  is  given  in  §  14*6  example  2. 

18—2 


276  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

various  series,  that  if  0  ^^<  1,  then 

c{c  —  l—{2c—a  —  b  —  l)x]F{a,h;c;x)  +  (c  —  a){c  —  h)  xF  (a,  6 ;  c  +  1 ;  ^) 

=  c{c-\){l  —  x)F{a,h;c-l;x) 

=  C(C-I)jl+    ^    {Un-Un-^X"-)-, 

where  Un  is  the  coefficient  oi  x^^  in  F {a,h;  c  —  \;  x). 

Now  make   x^l.     By   §   371,   the   right-hand   side   tends   to   zero   if 

00 

1  4-  S  {un  —  it'n-i)  converges  to  zero,  i.e.  if  Un  -*  0,  which  is  the  case  when 
»i=i 

R{c-a-h)>0. 

Also,  by  the  theorems  of  §  2'38  and  §  3"71,  the  left-hand  side  tends  to 
c{a  +  h—  c)  F  {a,h;  c;l)  +  {c  —  a){c  —  h)  F  {a,h;  c  i-l;!)  under  the  same 
condition. 

Therefore 

F{a,h-c;  l)  =  ^V^^^'~^V(a,  6;  c-M;  1). 
^^       c(c  —  a  —  6)  ^ 

Repeating  this  process,  we  see  that 

=  -!hm    n   ) ^-7—-^ , \\  lim  F{a,h;c+m;\), 

U^oo  n=o  {c  +  n)(c-a-b  +  n)]  ,„^„ 

if  these  two  limits  exist. 

But  (^  12*13)  the  former  limit  is  ^, \  „  , j-,  if  c  is  not  a  negative 

"^  1  (c  —  a)  1  (c  -  6)  ° 

integer ;  and,  if  u^  {a,  b,  c)  be  the  coefficient  of  x'^  in  F(a,  b;  c;  x),  and 

m>\c\,  we  have 

00 

\F {a,  b;  c  +  m;  1)  —  1\  ^  2  \un{a,  b,  c  +  7n)\ 

n  =  l 

00 

^  S  Un{\a\,  \b\,  m—  \c\) 

n  =  l 

\  ab\      °° 
<  -  - — —-,  S  Un(\a\  +  1,  \b\  +  l,  m  +  1  —  \c\). 

'm-\c\n=o 

Now  the  last  series  converges,  when  m>\c\  +  \a\  +  \b\  —  l,  and  is  a  positive 
decreasing  function  of  m;  therefore,  since  {m  —  j  c  j}~^  -*  0,  we  have 

lim  F(a,  b;  c  +  7n;  1)  =  1 ; 

m-*-  00 

and  therefore,  finally, 

F(a  5-c-l)  =  ^^^^^^i^^^^> 


14-2,  14-3]  THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  277 

14"2.     The  differential  equation  satisfied  by  F{a,b;c;z). 

The  reader  will  verify  without  difficulty,  by  the  methods  of  §  10*3,  that 
the  hypergeometric  series  is  an  integral  valid  near  z  =  0  of  the  hyper  geometric 
equation*  , 

from  §  10*3,  it  is  apparent  that  every  point  is  an  '  ordinary  point '  of  this 
equation,  with  the  exception  of  0,  1,  oo ,  and  that  these  are  '  regular  points.' 

Example.     Shew  that  an  integral  of  the  equation 

is 

z'^Fia  +  a,  b  +  a;    a-^+l;    z). 

14"3.     Solutions  of  Riemann's  P-equation  by  hypergeometric  functions. 

In  §  10*72  it  was  observed  that  Riemann's  differential  equationf 

^      [!-«-«'      \-^-^'      1-7-7]  du 
dz^      \     z  —  a  z  —  b  z  —  c     )  dz 

\aoL'  {a-b){a-c)     ^jS' (b -c){b  -  a)     yj' (c-a)(c-b) 
\  z—  a  z  —  b  z  —  c 

u 


{z  —  a){z  —  b)  {z  —  c) 


=  0, 


by  a  suitable  change  of  variable,  could  be  reduced  to  a  hypergeometric 
equation;  and,  carrying  out  the  change,  we  see  that  a  solution  of  Riemann's 
equation  is 

/z  -  aY  /2-cy  j^(        _  _,  ^  /    (2-  -  a)  (c  -  b)) 

provided  that  a  —  a'  is  not  a  negative  integer ;  for  simplicity,  we  shall, 
throughout  this  section,  suppose  that  no  one  of  the  exponent  differences 
a  —  a',/3  —  /3',y~  7'  is  zero  or  an  integer,  as  (§  10'32)  in  this  exceptional 
case  the  general  solution  of  the  differential  equation  may  involve  logarithmic 
terms ;  the  formulae  in  the  exceptional  case  will  be  found  in  a  memoir  J  by 
Lindelof,  to  which  the  reader  is  referred. 

Now  if  a  be  interchanged  with  a,  or  7  with  7',  in  this  expression,  it  must 
still  satisfy  Riemann's  equation,  since  the  latter  is  unaffected  by  this  change. 

*  This  equation  was  given  by  Gauss. 

t  The  constants  are  subject  to  the  condition  a  +  a'  +  ^  +  ^'  +  y  +  y'  =  1. 

X  Acta  Soc.   Sclent.  Fennicae,   xix.    (1893).     See   also    Klein's   Lectures,    Ueher   die    hijpfr- 
geometrische  Funktion. 


278  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

We  thus  obtain  altogether  four  expressions,  namely, 

fZ  -  ay'  f2  -  C\y     ri  {    ^        n  >        a'  -i  /  {c-h)(z-  Ci)] 

(z-aY(z-c\y'  J,  (        „        ,         ,   n/  .     /      1   .  /    (c-&)(^-a)l 

which  are  all  solutions  of  the  differential  equation. 

Moreover,  the  differential  equation  is  unaltered  if  the  triads  (a,  a',  a), 
{13,  ^',  h),  (7,  7',  c)  are  interchanged  in  any  manner.  If  therefore  we  make 
such  changes  in  the  above  solutions,  they  will  still  be  solutions  of  the 
differential  equation. 

There  are  five  such  changes  possible,  for  we  may  write 

\b,  c,  a],  [c,  a,  h],  [a,  c,  h],  [c,  h,  a],  [h,  a,  c] 

in  turn  in  place  of  [a,  h,  c],  with  corresponding  changes  of  a,  a',  /8,  /3',  7,  7'. 

We  thus  obtain  4  x  5  =  20  new  expressions,  which  with  the  original  four 
make  altogether  twenty-four  particular  solutions  of  Riemann's  equation,  in 
terms  of  hypergeometric  series. 

The  twenty  new  solutions  may  be  written  down  as  follows : 

/z  —  b\^/z  —  aY   „  f  _  ^       ,  ,       _      ^,    (a  —  c)  (z  -  b)] 

fz  -cy  fz-by  ^{  ^  ,      n     -,  >     (b  -  a)  (z  -  c)] 

/^  —  CX^'  /■S'  —  &\^    rr  f    /  /I        /  /        /I      -.  /  (b  —  a)  (z  —  c) 


c)(^-tOj' 

z  -  cy  (z  -  by  „  (  _,  /      ^/     1  ,    (6  -  a)  (^  -  c)l 

\Z  —  a)    \z  —  al         ['  '  {b  —  c){z  —  a)] 

cy  fZ  -  Z>\^'  r,  f    ,   ,    ^   ,    0/      /   ,   ^/   ,    /O' .  1    ,      '  .  (^  -  a)  (^  -  C)] 


144]  THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  279 

f         fz-ay-  /z-h\^  ^{  _  /     o     ,  ,     {b-c){z-  a)\ 


z-c)   \z-cJ    -   |--v  •  ^^'  -    '   /    ■  A-'  -  ■  -      -'  (6_a)(z-c)l' 
/z  -  ay  (z  -  by  „  f  ^,  /      ^/     -,  /    (&  -  c)  (^^  -  a)] 

/^  -  c\y  fz-ay  -^{        ^  _,  ^  ,     (a  -h){z-  c)] 

fz  — c\y  fz  —  ay'      {        „       ,  „,       ,     ,  ,    (a—b)(z  —  c)] 

fz  —  cy'  /z~ay'      {  ,      „       /     /      0/       /I        '  (a-b)(z  —  c)] 

\2r  —  a/    \z  —  a/        [  {c  —  b){z  —  a)) 

^.,___Y/^y^(  ,^  (c-«)(.-i)) 

V^  — a/    V^-a/        i  (c  — 6)(2^— a)j 

=  (i:i^yf-^)V|0  +  „  +  y,  ^  +  a'  +  y;  l+;3-;3-;<^-">(^-''n, 

V^  —  a/   V^  -  aj        {  {c~b){z  —  a)] 

fZ  —  by'fZ—cy'   ri{n>    ,         ,       '     a'   ,      /    ,      '     ^     ,    a>        /^    (c  -  «)  f^' -  6)] 

I,  V^^  -  a)    \z-aj         {  (c  -  6)  {z  -  a)) 

By   writing   0,    1  -  G,  A,  B,   0,    G  -  A  -  B,   x  for  a,   a',   yg,   /S',   7,   7', 

^       ^-^ ^  respectively,  we  obtain   24  solutions   of  the  hypergeometric 

equation  satisfied  by  F  {A,  B,G;  ai). 

The  existence  of  these  24  solutions  was  first  shewn  by  Kummer*. 

14"4.  Relations  betiueen  'particular  solutions  of  the  hypergeometric 
equation. 

It  has  just  been  shewn  that  24  expressions  involving  hypergeometric 
series  are  solutions  of  the  hypergeometric  equation;  and,  from  the  general 
theory  of  linear  differential  equations  of  the  second  order,  it  follows  that 
if  any  three  have  a  common  domain  of  existence,  there  must  be  a  linear 
relation  with  constant  coefficients  connecting  those  three  solutions. 

*  Crelle's  Journal,  xv.     They  are   obtained   in    a    different    manner   in   Forsyth's   Treatise 
on  Differential  Equations,  Chap.  vi. 


280  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

If  we  simplify  Wj,  Wg,  ^s,  W4 ;  u^^,  Ui^',  "21.  ^22  in  the  manner  indicated  at 
the  end  of  §  14"3,  we  obtain  the  following  solutions  of  the  hypergeometric 
equation  with  elements  A,  B,  C,  x\ 

y,  =F(A,B;C;x), 

y^  =(^-  xf-c  F{A-G  +\,  B  -  C  +1;  'i.-  G ;  x), 

2/3  ={l-xf-^-^F{G-B,G-A-G;x), 

y^  ={-xf-''{l-xf-^-''F{l-B,l-A;2-G;x), 

y,r=^FiA,  B;A+B-G+l;l-x), 

y,,  =  {l-xy-^-''F(G-B,G-A;C-A-B  +  l;l-x), 

y,,  =  (-x)-''F{A,  A-G+1;A-B  +  1;  x-'), 

y^  =  (-x)-^F(B,B-G+l;B-A  +  l;x-'). 

If  I  arg  (1  —  a;)  I  <  TT,  it  is  easy  to  see  from  §  2'53  that,  when  |  a;  |  <  1,  the 
relations  connecting  2/1,  2/2?  ^a,  Vi  must  be  y^  =  y.^,  y.^  =  y^,  by  considering  the 
form  of  the  expansions  near  a;  =  0  of  the  series  involved. 

In  this  manner  we  can  group  the  functions  u^,  ...  ii^i  into  six  sets  of  four, 

VIZ.   Ui,   'W3,   Mis,    Mj5  ,     U2,    M4,   Wi4,   Wig,     W5,    Uj ,   U'Zli   ^23  3   ^6>    ^8)   ^22}   '^24  5   ^9  >   ^11)    ^17  >   '^19  3 

Uio,  1*12,  Wi8>  U20,  such  that  members  of  the  same  set  are  constant  multiples  of 
one  another  throughout  a  suitably  chosen  domain. 

In  particular,  we  observe  that  Ui,  u^,  Wjg,  u^^  are  constant  multiples  of 
a  function  which  (by  §§  5*4,  2"53)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 


{z  -  ay  |l  +   i  en  {z  -  ay\ 


when  \z  —  a\  is  sufficiently  small ;  when  arg  {z  —  a)  is  so  restricted  that 
{z  —  ay  is  one-valued,  this  solution  of  Riemann's  equation  is  usually  written 
P'"'.  And  P^"'^  ;  P'^',  P<^'> ;  P<>',  P'y*  are  defined  in  a  similar  manner  when 
\z  —  a\,  \z  —  h\,  \z  —  c\  respectively  are  sufficiently  small. 

To  obtain  the  relations  which  connect  three  members  of  separate  sets 
of  solutions  is  much  more  difficult.  The  relations  have  been  obtained  by 
elaborate  transformations  of  the  double  circuit  integrals  which  will  be  obtained 
later  in  1 14"61 ;  but  a  more  simple  and  singularly  elegant  method  has  recently 
been  discovered  by  Barnes ;  of  his  investigation  we  shall  give  a  brief  account. 

14'5.     Barnes   contour  integrals  for  the  hypergeornetric  function*. 
Consider  ^^j_^^  -^ -^.^ (-  zyds, 

where  j  arg  (—  z)\<  tt,  and  the  path  of  integration  is  curved  (if  necessary)  to 
ensure  that  the  polesof  r(a +  6')  r(6  +  s),  viz.  s  =  — a  —  7i,~b-n(n  =  0,l,2, ...), 

*  Proc.  London  Matli.  Soc.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  vi.  pp.  141-177.  References  to  previous  work  on 
similar  topics  by  Barnes  and  Mellin  are  there  given. 


14-5] 


THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION 


281 


lie  on  the  left  of  the  path  and  the  poles  of  r(—s),  viz.  s  =  0,  1,  2,  ...,  lie  on 
the  right  of  the  path*. 

From  §  136  it  follows  that  the  integrand  is 

0[\s |«+&-«-i  exp  {- arg {- z) .  I (s)  -7r\I(s)\]] 

as  5  -^  00  on  the  contour,  and  hence  it  is  easily  seen  (§  5 "32)  that  the  inte- 
grand is  an  analytic  function  of  z  throughout  the  domain  defined  by  the 
inequality  |  arg  2;  |  ^  tt  —  8,  where  8  is  any  positive  number. 

Now,  taking  note  of  the  relation  F  (—  s)  F  (1  +  s)  =  —  tt  cosec  stt,  consider 

^iri  J  c^{c  +  s)V{l+s)   sin  sir 
where  C  is  the  semicircle  of  radius  i\^  +  ^  on  the  right  of  the  imaginary  axis 
with  centre  at  the  origin,  and  N  is  an  integer. 

Now,  by  §  13*6,  we  have 

T{a  +  s)V{h  +  s)  irj-zr  ^  ^  .^«^,_,_,x    {-^ 
F  (c  +  5)  F  (1  +  s)    sin  sir  ' '  sin  sir 

as  JSf^oo ,  the  constant  implied  in  the  symbol  0  being  independent  of  args 
when  s  is  on  the  semicircle  ;  and,  if  s  =  (N  +  -  j  e^^  and  |  2^  |  <  1,  we  have 


(—  zy  cosec  sir  —  0 


exp  \lN+^jcos6log\z\-(N  +  ^j  sin  0  arg  (-  z) 


-    N  + 


sin  6 


exp  \(N  +  ljcosd\og\z\-(N+^jB\  sin  6 
Orexp|2-4('i\^+^')log| 


0  ^  I  ^  k  7  TT, 


0 


exp 


-2-^^8(n  +  1 


1 

4^^ 


1 


Hence  if  \og\z\   is  negative  (i.e.  \z\<l),  the  integrand  tends  to  zero 
sufficiently  rapidly  (for  all  values  of  6  under  consideration)  to  ensure  that 


/. 


0  as  iV^  ^  X  . 


Now 


J.-.y,i  (7-Oc/  JC  .(.V+i)ij 


by  Cauchy's  theorem,  is  equal  to  minus  27ri  times  the  sum  of  the  residues 
of  the  integrand  at  the  points  s  =  0,  1,  2,  ...  N.     Make  N ^  cc  ,  and  the  last 

*  It  is  assumed  that  a  and  b  are  such  that  the  contour  can  be  drawn,  i.e.   that  a  and  b 
are  not  negative  integers  (in  which  case  the  hypergeometric  series  is  merely  a  polynomial). 


282  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

three  integrals  tend  to  zero  when  \  arg  {—  2)\^7r  —  8,  and  |  ^  |  <  1,  and  so,  in 
these  circumstances, 

^ — -■  TTT^ T — ^ (—  ^y  ds  =   hm    X  — ^-Y^, — ' — ^ — ; — -  z^, 

2771  J. ^i  r(c  +  s)  N^oo  n  =  0  F  (c  +  tl)  .  H  \ 

the  general   term  in  this  summation  being  the  residue  of  the  integrand 

at  s  =  n. 

Thus  an  analytic  function  {namely  the  integral  under  consideration)  exists 
throughout  the  domain  defined  by  the  inequality  \  arg z\<  it,  and,  when  | ^  j  <  1, 
tills  analytic  function  may  be  represented  by  the  series 

„to       r  (c  +  n) .  n  ! 

The  symbol  F(a,b;c;z)  will,  in  future,  be  used  to  denote  this  function 
divided  by  T  (a)  T  {b)/r  (c). 

14'51.     The  continuation  of  the  hypergeometric  series. 

To  obtain  a  representation  of  the  function  F{a,  b;  c;  z)  in  the  form  of 
series  convergent  when  |  ^  |  >  1,  we  shall  employ  the  integral  obtained  in 
§  14'5.  If  D  be  the  semicircle  of  radius  p  on  the  left  of  the  imaginary  axis 
with  centre  at  the  origin,  it  may  be  shewn*  by  the  methods  of  §  14"5  that 

1   r  i>+^)r(i+^rj-.)  ^ ^^. ^^ , ^ 

^injj)  V{c  +  s)  ^ 

as  p  -*  CO  ,  provided  that  j  arg  (—  z)\  <7r,  \z\  >1  and  /a  -*  oo  in  such  a  way 
that  the  lower  bound  of  the  distance  of  D  from  poles  of  the  integrand 
is  a  positive  number  (not  zero). 

Hence  it  can  be  proved  (as  in  the  corresponding  work  of  §  14"5)  that, 
when  j  arg  (—  2;)  |  <  tt  and  !  ^  |  >  1, 

2-77*  J  r  (c  +  s)  ^ 

_   ^   r  (g  +  n)  r  (1  -  c  +  a+  n)        sin  {c-  a-  n)  ir ,      s  ^_,j 

„=o  r  (1  +  n)  r  (1  -  6  +  ft  +  n)  cos  nir  sin  (6  —  a  —  n)  tt  ^ 

I   r  (6  +  n)  V  {l-c  +  b  +ji)         sin  (c  -  6  -  n^Tr    __  ^^_^^ 

„=o  r  (1  +  ?i)  r  (1  —  ft  +  6  +  n)  cos  niT  sin  {a  —  b  —  n)7r 

the  expressions  in  these  summations  being  the  residues  of  the  integrand  at 
the  points  s  =  —  a  —  n,  s  =  —  b  —  n  respectively. 

It    then    follows  at   once   on  simplifying  these  series   that   the  analytic 

*  In  considering  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  the  integrand  when  [  s  |  is  large  on  the  contour 
or  on  D,  it  is  simplest  to  transform  V  {a  +  s),  T  (b  +  s),  V  (c  +  s)  by  the  relation  of  §  12-14. 


14-51,  14-52]  THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  283 

continuation  of  the  series,  by  which  the  hypergeometric  function  was 
originally  defined,  is  given  by  the  equation 

r(a)r(6)„,     ,  -      r(a)r{a-b),      ,_„„,     ,         ,17,     .  _u 

Tic)    ^^^'^'  ^'  ^)  =  ~-YW~-'^^~^^     ^^'  '  '       ^ 

^r(b)r{b-a)  1-c  +  b;  1  -a  +  b;z-^), 

r(6  — c) 

where  |  arg  (—  ^)  |  <  tt. 

It  is  readily  seen  that  each  of  the  three  terms  in  this  equation  is  a  solution 
of  the  hypergeometric  equation  (see  §  14-4). 

This  result  has  to  be  modified  when  a  —  6  is  an  integer  or  zero,  as  some  of  the  poles  of 
r(a  +  s)r{b  +  s)  are  double  poles,  and  the  right-hand  side  then  may  involve  logarithmic 
terms,  in  accordance  with  §  14'3. 

Corollary.     Putting  b—c,  we  see  that  if  |  arg  {-  z)\  <  tt, 

r(a)(l-2)-«  =  -i-.  /"'  T{a  +  s)r{-s){-zyds, 
Znl  J  -xii 

where  (1  — 2)~"-^l  as  z-^-O,  and  so  the  value  of  |  arg(l  -z)  \  which  is  less  than  tt  always 
has  to  be  taken  in  this  equation,  in  virtue  of  the  cut  (see  §  14'1)  from  0  to  +oo  caused 
by  the  inequality  |  arg  {—z)\  <  tt. 

14 '52.     Barnes'  lemma. 

If  the  path  of  integration  is  curved  so  that  the  poles  of  Y  {y  —  s)T  {b  —  s)  lie  on  the  right 
of  the  path  and  the  poles  of  r  (a  +  s)  r  O  +  s)  lie  on  the  left*,  then 

Write  /  for  the  expression  on  the  left. 

If  C  be  defined  to  be  the  semicircle  of  radius  p  on  the  right  of  the  imaginary  axis  with 
centre  at  the  origin,  and  if  p-»-cc  in  such  a  way  that  the  lower  bound  of  the  distance  of 
C  from  the  poles  of  r  (y  —  s)  r  (8  -  s)  is  positive  (not  zero),  it  is  readily  seen  that 

T(a  +  s)ri^  +  s)T{y~s)T{8-s)  =  ^^^^^^^-^7r'^coseoiy-s)neOBecid-s)^ 

=  0[s<^+^+y+«-2exp{-27r|/(s)|}], 
as  I  s  I  -»•  X  on  the  imaginary  axis  or  on  C. 

Hence  the  original  integral  converges ;  and  I    -*.0  as  p  -*.  oo  ,  when  R(a  +  l3  +  y  +  8-l)<0. 

Thus,  as  in  §  14-5,  the  integral  involved  in  /is  ivi  times  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  the 
integrand  at  the  poles  of  r  (y  — s)  r  (S  — s)  ;  evaluating  these  residues  we  gett 

rt=or(?i+l)r(l+y-S  +  7i)  sin(S-y)7r   "*' «=o  T  ()i+ 1)  T  (1  +  8-y +  n)  sin(y-8)7r" 

*  It  is  supposed  that  a,  /3,  y,  d  are  such  that  no  pole  of  the  first  set  coincides  with  any  pole 
of  the  second  set. 

+  These  two  series  converge  (§  2-38). 


284  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

And  so,  using  the  result  of  §  12-14  freely,  by  §  14*11  : 

_7rr(l-a-3-y-S)    f        T{a  +  8)r{^  +  8) F  (g  +  y)  T  (g  +  y)        ] 

sin(y-8)7r  lr(l-a-y)r(l-^-y)       T  (1  -  a-S)  T  (1  -  ^-8)J 

-  sin  (a  +  8)  TT  sin  O  +  8)  rr}. 
But         2sin  (a  +  y)7rsin  0  +  y)  7r-2  sin(a  +  S)  tt  sin(/3  +  8)7r 

=  COs(a  — 0)  TT  -COs(a  +  ^  +  2y)  tt  — COS  (a-/3)  tt+COS  (a  +  3  +  28)  tt 

=  2sin(y-S)7rsin(a  +  i3+y  +  S)n-. 
Therefore  ^^r(a  +  y)  r(^+y)  r  (a  +  8)  r  (/3  +  8) 

r(a  +  i3  +  y  +  S)  ' 

which  is  the  required  result ;  it  has,  however,  only  been  proved  when 

7E(a  +  /3  +  y+8-l)<0; 

but  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  it  is  true  throughout  the  domain  through 
which  both  sides  of  the  equation  are  analytic  functions  of,  say,  a  ;  and  hence  it  is  true  for 
all  values  of  a,  /3,  y,  8  for  which  none  of  the  poles  of  r  (a  +  s)  r  0+s),  qua  function  of  s, 
coincide  with  any  of  the  poles  of  r  (y  — s)  r  (8  — s). 

Corollary.  Writing  s+^,  a  —  k,  ^-k,  y+k,  8  +  ^'  in  place  of  s,  a,  ^,  y,  8,  we  see  that 
the  result  is  still  true  when  the  limits  of  integration  are  —k±cci,  where  k  is  any  real 
constant. 

14 "SS.     The  connexion  between  hypergeometric fimctions  of  z  and  of\—z. 
We  have  seen  that  if  |  arg  ( -  2)  |  <  tt, 
V{a)V{b)  „,      ,  ,        1     /■*'■    T(a+s)T(b  +  s)T(-s) ,      ,     - 

^^      T{-s){-zY     ,„ 


r  {c  -a)V  {c-  b)      ' 
by  Barnes'  lemma. 

If  ^  be  so  chosen  that  the  lower  bound  of  the  distance  between  the  s  contour  and  the 
t  contour  is  jjositive  (not  zero),  it  may  be  shewn  that  the  order  of  integration  *  may  be 
interchanged. 

Carrying  out  the  interchange,  we  see  that  if  arg  (1  -2)  be  given  its  principal  value, 

V  {c-a)V  {c-b)V  {d)V  {b)  F{a,  b;  c;  z)jT  {c) 

'r{a  +  t)T{b  +  t)r{c-a-b-t)  i~  I  "'    T  {s-t)r  (-s)  (-zydsl  dt 

t-ooj  {.^TTl  J    _a=i  ) 

T  {a  +  t)  T  {b  +  t)  V  {c  -  a-b  -t)T  {-t)  {\  -  zY  dt. 

*  Methods  similar  to  those  of  §  4-51  may  be  used,  or  it  may  be  proved  without  much  difficulty 
that  conditions  established  by  Bromwich,  Infinite  Series,  §  177,  are  satisfied. 


277J   j 


14-53,  14'6]  THE   HYPERGKOMETRIC   FUNCTION  285 

Now,  when  |  arg  (1  -  a)  |  <  27r  and  \l—z\<l,  this  last  integral  may  be  evaluated  by  the 
methods  of  Barnes'  lemma  (§  14"52) ;  and  so  we  deduce  that 

r  {c-  a)  r  (c -b)  r  (a)  T  {b)  F {a,  b  ;  c  ;  z) 

=  r{c)T{a)T{b)r(c-a-b)F{a,b;  a+b-c  +  1;  1-z) 

+  r{c)r{c-a)T{c-b)r{a  +  b-c){l-zy-<*-^F{c-a,c-b;  c-a-b  +  1;  l-z\ 

a  result  which  shews  the  nature  of  the  singularity  of  F{a,  b  ;  c  ;  z)  at  2=1. 

This  result  has  to  be  modified  if  c  —  a  —  6  is  an  integer  or  zero,  as  then 

T  ia  +  t)T  {b  +  t)T  {c-a-b  -t)  r  {-  t) 

has  double  poles,  and  logarithmic  terms  may  appear.     With  this  exception,  the  result  is 
valid  when  |  arg  (-z)\<7r,  \  arg  (1  - 2)  |  < tt. 

Taking  |  2  |  <  1,  we  may  make  2  tend  to  a  real  value,  and  we  see  that  the  result  still 
holds  for  real  values  of  2  such  that  0  <  2  <  1 . 

14*6.     Solution  of  Rierrumns  equation  hy  a  contour  integral. 

We  next  proceed  to  establish  a  result  relating  to  the  expression  of  the 
hypergeometric  function  by  means  of  contour  integrals. 

Let  the  dependent  variable  u  in  Riemann's  equation  (§  107)  be  replaced 
by  a  new  dependent  variable  7,  defined  by  the  relation 

u  =  {z-aY{z-hY  {z-c)y  I. 

The  differential  equation  satisfied  by  /  is  easily  found  to  be 

d^I      (1  +  a-a'      H-/3-/S'      1+7-7']^/ 


dz^      [     z  —  a  z  —  b  z  —  c     ]  dz 

^  (a  +  ^  + 7)  {(«  +  yg  +  7  + 1)^  +  ^0^  («  +  /3^+7- 1)1  j_Q 
{z  —  a){z  —  h)  {z  —  c) 

which  can  be  written  in  the  form 

+  {I  (A.  -  2)  (A,  -  1)  Q"  {z)  +  (X  -  1)  R'  {z)]  1=0, 
where  (       A,  =  1  —  a  —  /3  —  7  =  a'  +  /3'  +  7', 

Q{z)  =  (z-a)(z-b){z-c), 

R{z)  =  'E(a.'  +  ^  +  y){z-b){z-c). 

It  must  be  observed  that  the  function  /  is  not  analytic  at  qo  ,  and  consequently  the 
above  differential  equation  in  /  is  not  a  case  of  the  generalised  hypergeometric  equation. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  this  differential  equation  can  be  satisfied  by  an 
integral  of  the  form 

1=  [  (t-  ay+P+y-'  {t  -  by+^'+y-'  {t  -  cY+^+y'-'  (z  -  i)-»-^-r  dt, 

■'  c 
provided  that  C,  the  contour  of  integration,  is  suitably  chosen. 


286  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

For  on  substituting  this  value  of  /  in  the  differential  equation,  the 
condition*  that  the  equation  should  be  satisfied  becomes 

(  (t-  aY+P^y-'  (t  -  hy+^'+y-^  {t  -  cY+p-^y'-'  {z  -  ty^-^-y-^  Kdt  =  0, 
J  c 

where 

K  =  (X-2)\q  (z)  +  (t-z)  Q  {z)  +  \{t-  zf  Q"  (z)^ 

+  (t-z){R{z)  +  (t-z)R'(z)] 
==(X-2){Q{t)-(t-zy]+{t-z){R(t)-{t-zyi(a'  +  ^  +  y)} 
=  {\-2)Q  (t)  +  {t-z)R  (t) 
=  -(l  +  a  +  ^  +  ry)(t-a){t-b)(t-c) 

+  t(a'  +  ^  +  ry){t-b)(t-c){t-z). 

f   dV 
It  follows  that  the  condition  to  be  satisfied  reduces  to       —5-  dt  =  0,  where 

J  c  at 

V=(t-  ay+^+y  (t  -  bY+^+y  (t  -  cY+^+y'  (t  -  2)-a+-+p+y), 

The  integral  /  will  therefore  be  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation, 
provided  C  is  such  that  V  resumes  its  initial  value  after  t  has  described  C. 

Now 

F=  {t  -  aY+^+y-'  (t  -  bY+^'-^y-'  {t  -  cY+p+y'-'  {z  -  ty'^-^-y  u, 

where  U=-  (t  -a)(t-  b)  (t  -c)(z-  t)-\ 

Now  ?7  is  a  one-valued  function  of  t ;  hence  if  C  be  a  closed  contour,  it 
must  be  such  that  the  integrand  in  the  integral  /  resumes  its  original  value 
after  describing  the  contour. 

Hence  finally  any  integral  of  tJie  type 

(z  -  aY {z  -  by  (z -  c)y !  {t-  ay+y+''-'{t-b)y+''-^P'-'{t-cY--p+y'~'{z-t)---p-ydt, 

where  0  is  either  a  closed  contour  in  the  t- plane  such  that  the  integrand 
resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing  it,  or  else  is  a  siinp)le  curve  such  that 
the  quantity  V  has  the  same  value  at  its  ter^mini,  is  a  solution  of  the  differential 
equation  of  the  general  hyper  geometric  function. 

The  reader  is  referred  to  the  memoirs  of  Pochhammer  {Math.  Ann.  xxxv.)  and  Hobson 
{Phil.  Trans.  187  a)  for  an  account  of  the  methods  by  which  integrals  of  this  type 
are  transformed  so  as  to  give  rise  to  tlie  relations  of  i^i^  14"51,  14*53. 

Example  1.  We  can  now  deduce  a  real  definite  integral  which,  in  certain  circumstances, 
represents  the  hypergeometric  series. 

*  The  differentiations  under  the  sign  of  integi-ation  are  legitimate  (§  4*2)  if  the  path  C  does 
not  depend  on  z  and  does  not  j^ass  through  the  points  a,  h,  c,  z  ;  if  C  be  an  iutinite  contour  or  if 
C  passes  through  the  points  a,  b,  c  or  z,  further  conditions  are  necessary. 


14-61]  THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  287 

The  hyi-Kjrgeometric  series  F{a,  b;  c;  z)  is,  as  already  shewn,  a  solution  of  the  differential 
equation  defined  by  the  scheme 

*       r     0       X  1  ^ 

{,  l-c      b     c-a-b      ] 
If  in  the  integral 

which   is  a  constant  multiple  of  that  just  obtained,  we  make  b-^-cc    (without  paying 
attention  to  the  validity  of  this  process),  we  are  led  to  consider 


/. 


c 
Now  the  limiting  form  of  V  in  question  is 

and  this  tends  to  zero  at  ^  =  1  and  t  =  cc  ,  provided  R{c)  >  R  {b)  >  0. 

We  accordingly  consider   I     t'^'"  {t-lY~''~''-  {t  -z)~"'dt,  where  z  is  not*  positive  and 
greater  than  1. 

In  this  integral,  write  t  =  u~'^ ;  the  integral  becomes 


/: 


u'>-^  {I  -  uy-^-'^  (l  -uzy  du. 


We  are  therefore  led  to  expect  that  this  integral  may  be  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation 
for  the  hypergeometric  series. 

The  reader  will  easily  see  that  if  R{c)>  R  {b)  >  0,  and  if  arg  «  =  arg  (1  —  «)  =  0,  while  the 
branch  of  l-uz  is  specified  by  tlie  fact  that  {l—7iz)~'^-*'l  as  u-*-0,  the  integral  just 
found  is 

This  can  be  proved  by  expandingt  {l  —  uz)~°'  in  ascending  powers  of  z  when  |2|  <  1  and 
using  §  12-41. 

Example  2.     Deduce  the  result  of  i^  14'11  from  the  preceding  example. 

14"61.     Determination  of  an  integral  u-hich  represents  P^'^'. 

We  shall  now  shew  how  an  integral  which  represents  the  particular  solution  P^'^^ 
(§  14-3)  of  the  hypergeometric  differential  equation  can  be  found. 

We  have  seen  (§  14-6)  that  the  integral 

]  =  {z-af{z-h)\z-cy\{t-af+y^^'-\t-b)y^^^^'-\t-cT^^+'''-\t-z)-''-^--^dt 

satisfies  the  differential  equation  of  the  hypergeometric  function,  jjrovided  C  is  a  closed 
contour  such  that  the  integrand  resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing  C.  Now  the 
singularities  of  this  integrand  in  the  ^plane  are  the  points  a,  b,  c,  z;  and  after  describing 
the  double  circuit  contour  (i^  12'43)  symbolised  hy  {b  +  ,c  +  ,b-,  c  - )  the  integrand  returns 
to  its  original  value. 

*  This  ensures  that  the  point  t—ljz  is  not  on  the  path  of  integration, 
t  The  justification  of  this  process  by  §  4-7  is  left  to  the  reader. 


288  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

Now,  if  z  lie  in  a  circle  whose  centre  is  a  circle  not  containing  either  of  the  points 
h  and  c,  we  can  choose  the  path  of  integration  so  that  t  is  outside  this  circle,  and  so 

1 0  -  a  i  <  I  ^  -  a  I  for  all  points  t  on  the  path. 

Now  choose  arg  (2  -  a)  to  be  numerically  less  than  ir  and  arg  {z  —  h\  arg  (2  —  c)  so  that 
they  reduce  to*  arg  (a -6),  arg(a  — c)when  2-*- a;  fix  arg(<-a),  arg(<  — 5),  arg(^  — c)  at 
the  point  N  at  which  the  path  of  integration  starts  and  ends ;  also  choose  arg  (f  —  2)  to 
reduce  to  arg(^-a)  when  z-^a. 

Then  (2-j/  =  (a-6/|l  +  fl(^j  +  ...l, 

and  since  we  can  expand  {t-z)""-'^"^  into  an  absolutely  and  uniformly  convergent  series 

we  may  expand  the  integral  into  a  series  which  converges  absolutely. 

Multiplying  up  the  absolutely  convergent  series,  we  get  a  series  of  integer  powers  of 
z-a  multiplied  by  {z-af.     Consequently  we  must  have 

(6+,c+,6-,c-) 

J  N 

We  can  define  p("'\  p(^\  P^^'\  p(v),  pW)  by  double  circuit  integrals  in  a  similar 
manner. 

14'7.     Relations  between  contiguous  hypergeonietric  functions. 

Let  P{z)  be  a  solution  of  Riemann's  equation  with  argument  2^,  singularities 
a,  b,  c,  and  exponents  a,  a',  y8,  jS',  7,  7'.  Further  let  P{z)  be  a  constant 
multiple  of  one  of  the  six  functions  P<"),  P*"^',  P'^»,  P'^',  PO',  P<>''.  Let 
P^+i^jft-i  (^)  denote  the  function  which  is  obtained  by  replacing  two  of  the 
exponents,  I  and  m,  in  P(^)  by  ^  +  1  and  m  -  1  respectively.  Such  functions 
P;+i,m.-i  (^)  are  said  to  be  contiguous  to  P  {z).  There  are  clearly  6  x  5  =  30  con- 
tiguous functions,  since  I  and  m  may  be  any  two  of  the  six  exponents. 

It  was  first  shewn  by  Riemann*f-  that  the  function  P(z)  and  any  two  of 
its  contiguous  functions  are  connected  by  a  linear  relation,  the  coejjicients  in 
which  are  polynomials  in  z. 

There  will  clearly  be  -  x  30  x  29  =  435  of  these  relations.     To  shew  how 

to  obtain  them,  we  shall  take  P  {z)  in  the  form 


p  (^)  =  {z-  ay  {z  -  by  {z  -  c)y  \    {t  -  ay^y+'^'-'  (t  -  6)y+-+^'-i 

{t-cy+P+y-'{z-t)-^-^-ydt, 

where  C  is  a  double  circuit  contour  of  the  type  considered  in  §  14"61. 

*  The  values  of  arg  {a  -  h),  arg  (a  -  c)  being  fixed. 

t  Abhandlurifien  der  Kon.  Ges.  der  Wins,  zu  Gottingen,  1857;  Gauss  had  previously  obtained 
15  relations  between  contiguous  hypergeometric  functions. 


14*7]  THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  289 

First,  since  the  integral  round  G  of  the  differential  of  any  function  which 
resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing  C  is  zero,  we  have 

0  =  f  i-Aii-  ay-^^'-y  {t  -  by+p'+y-'  (t  -  cy-^^+r-^  (t  -  zy-^-p-y]  dt 

J  CCI'i 

On  performing  the  differentiation  by  differentiating  each  factor  in  turn, 
we  get 

(a'  +  /3  +  7)  P  +  (a  +  yS'  +  7  -  1)  Pa'+^,^'-r  +  («  +  ^  +  7'  -  1)  i'a'+i.y-i 
_(a  +  ^  +  7)p 

Considerations  of  symmetry  shew  that  the  right-hand  side  of  this 
equation  can  be  replaced  by 

(a  +  ^  +  y)  J, 

These,  together  with  the  analogous  formulae  obtained  by  cyclical  inter- 
change* of  {a,  a,  a)  with  (b,  ^,  yS')  and  (c,  7,  7'),  are  six  linear  relations 
connecting  the  hypergeometric  function  P  with  the  twelve  contiguous 
functions 

■^a+l,P'—l>       -^^+1,-)''— 1)      -^-y+l.a'-l,        -Ta+l.v'-lj       ■Pfi+l,a'—l,      X"^y+i,^'— i. 

Next,  writing  t  -  a  =  {t  —  b)  ■{■  {b  -  a),  and  usingf  Pa'_i  to  denote  the  result 
of  writing  a'  —  1  for  a!  in  P,  we  have 

Similarly  P  =  P„-_i_  y+i  +  {c-a)  P^'_^ . 

Eliminating  Pa'_i  from  these  equations,  we  have 

(c-b)P  +  (a-c)  Pa'-i,§'+i  +  (b-a)  Pa'-i,y+i  =  0. 

This  and  the  analogous  formulae  are  three  more  linear  relations  con- 
necting P  with  the  last  six  of  the  twelve  contiguous  functions  written  above. 

Next,  writing  (t  —  2!)  =  (t  —  a)  —  (z  —  a)  we  readily  find  the  relation 
P  =  ^  P^-M.y-i  -  (^  -  ay^'  (^  -hnz-  c)y 


X 

'  c 


I  (t-  af+y+^'-'  {z  -  a)>+»+^'-i  {z  -  by+^+y'-'  {t  -  ^)-«-^-y-l  dt, 


which  gives  the  equations 

(^  _  a)-i  [p-{z-  by-  p,+,,y-x]  =  (^  -  by-  [P-{z-  cy-  P,+,,a--i} 


=  {z-  cy-  [P-{z-  ay-  p„ 


+1,0-1 ) 


*  The   interchange   is  to   be   maile  only  in    the   integrands ;    the   contour   C   is  to  remain 
unaltered. 

t  -Pa'-i  is  not  a  function  of  Riemann's  type  since  the  sum  of  its  exponents  at  a,  h,  c  is  not 
unity. 

W.    M.    A.  19 


290  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

These  are  two  more  linear  equations  between  P  and  the  above  twelve 
contiguous  functions. 

We  have  therefore  now  altogether  found  eleven  linear  relations  between 
P  and  these  twelve  functions,  the  coefficients  in  these  relations  being  rational 
functions  of  z.  Hence  each  of  these  functions  can  be  expressed  linearly  in 
terms  of  P  and  some  selected  one  of  them ;  that  is,  between  P  and  any  two  of 
the  above  functions  there  exists  a  linear  relation.  The  coefficients  in  this 
relation  will  be  rational  functions  of  z,  and  therefore  will  become  polynomials 
in  z  when  the  relation  is  multiplied  throughout  by  the  least  common  multiple 
of  their  denominators. 

The  theorem  is  therefore  proved,  so  far  as  the  above  twelve  contiguous 
functions  are  concerned.  It  can,  without  difficulty,  be  extended  so  as  to  be 
established  for  the  rest  of  the  thirty  contiguous  functions. 

Corollary.  If  functions  be  derived  from  P  by  replacing  the  exponents  a,  a',  /3,  /3',  y,  y' 
by  a+p,  a' +  5,  i3  +  ?',  i3'  +  «,  y  +  ^,  7+^)  where  jtj,  q.,  r,  s,  t,  u  are  integers  satisfying  the 
relation 

p  +  q  +  r  +  s  +  t  +  u  =  0, 

then  between  P  and  any  two  such  functions  there  exists  a  linear  relation,  the  coeflBcients 
in  which  are  polynomials  in  z. 

This  result  can  be  obtained  by  connecting  P  with  the  two  functions  by  a  chain  of 
intermediate  contiguous  functions,  writing  down  the  linear  relations  which  connect  them 
with  P  and  the  two  functions,  and  from  these  relations  eliminating  the  intermediate 
contiguous  functions. 

Many  theorems  which  will  be  established  subsequently,  e.g.  the  recurrence-formulae 
for  the  Legendre  functions  (§  15*21 ),  are  really  cases  of  the  theorem  of  "this  article. 


REFERENCES. 

C.  F.  Gauss,  Oes.    Werke,  Bd.  lii.  pp.  123-163,  207-229. 

E.  E.  KuMMER,  Crelle,  Bd.  xv.  pp.  39-83. 

G.  F.  B.  RiEMANN,  Ges.  Math.    Werke,   pp.  67-84. 

E.  Papperitz,  Math.  Ann.  Bd.  xxv.  pp.  212-221. 

E.  W.  Barnes,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  vi.  pp.  141-177. 

H.  J.  Mellin,  Acta  Soc.  Fennicae,  Vol.  xx.  No.  12. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that 

F{a,  h+l;c;  z)-F{a,  b;  c;  z)  =  '!^  F{a  +  l,  6+1  ;  c  +  1 ;  z). 

2.  Shew  that  if  a  is  a  negative  integer  while  id  and  y  are  not  integers,  then  the  ratio 
F{a,  j3;  a  +  ^  +  l-y;  l-.v)-^F{a,  /3;  y;  x)  is  independent  of  .v,  and  find  its  value. 


THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  291 

dP         cPP 

3.  li  P(z)  be  a  hypergeoraetric  function,  express  its  derivates  -r-  and  -t„  linearly  in 

terms  of  P  and  contiguous  functions,  and  hence  find  the  linear  relation  between  P,  -t-  , 

dz 

,  d^P   . 
and  -ry ,  I.e.  verify  that  P  satisfies  the  hypergeometric  differential  equation. 

4.  Shew  that  F {^,  I;  1 ;  42  (1  -2)}  satisfies  the  hypergeometric  equation  satisfied  by 
^(h  i ;  1  ;  ■^)-  Shew  that  in  the  left-hand  half  of  the  lemniscate  |  z  (1  —z)  |  =  ^,  these  two 
functions  are  equal ;  and  in  the  right-hand  half  of  the  lemniscate  the  former  function  is 
equal  to  F{^,  | ;  1  ;  1  -2). 

5.  If  Fa+  =F{a  +  l,  b;  c;  x),  Fa-=F{a  —  l,  b;  c;  x),  determine  the  15  linear  relations 
with  polynomial  coefficients  which  connect  F{a,  b;c;  x)  with  pairs  of  the  six  functions 
-^o  +  j  Fa-,  Fb  +  ,  Fi,_,  Fc  +  ,  F^_.  (Gauss.) 

6.  Shew  that  the  hypergeometric  equation 

is  satisfied  by  the  two  integrals  (supposed  convergent) 

\^-^  {\-z)-i-^-^  {\-  xzy  dz 


and 


/: 

["  z^-^{\-zf-^\l~{^\-x)z)-''dz. 


7.  Shew  that,  for  values  of  x  between  0  and  1,  the  solution  of  the  equation 

is  ^F{|a,  i^;|;(l-2^)2}-fi5(l-2^)i^{|(a+l),  H/3  +  l);|;(l-2^n, 

where  .4,  B  are  arbitrary  constants  and  F  {a,  i^;y,x)  represents  the  hypergeometric  series. 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 

8.  Shew  that 

x^l-oL    ^''^'^'    ^    nj    '  7i!r(y-a)r(y-^)r(«)r(^)  ^'    ^>  J 

^r^(y-„_/3)r(y) 

r(y-a)r(y-/a) 

where  k  is  the  integer  such  that  ^  ^  7^  (a  +  ^  -  y)  <  ^  -f  1. 

(This  specifies  the  manner  in  which  the  hypergeometric  function  becomes  infinite  when 
•*-■-►  1  -  0  provided  a  -f  /3  -  y  is  not  an  integer.)  (Hai-dy.) 

9.  Shew  that,  when  R{y-a-li)  <0,  then 

r(y)^°+^-v 
''"•(«4-^-y)r(a)r(^) 

as  n-^  CO  ;  where  Sn  denotes  the  sum  of  the  first  n  terms  of  the  series  for  F{a,  ^■,y;\). 

(M.  J.  1\I.  Hill,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  v.) 

19—2 


292  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

10.     Shew  that  if  yi,  y^  be  independent  solutions  of  • 


the  general  solution  of 

d^z  .  „  ^d^z 
d^ 


is  z  =  Ay-^  +  Byxy.^+  Cy^^  where  A,  B^  Care  constants. 

(Appell,  Comptes  Rendus,  xci.) 

11.  Deduce  from  example  10  that  if  a  +  6  +  |  =  c, 

/w,,   .-.-..v.  r(c)r(2c-l)         -    r(2a  +  n)r(a  +  6  +  n)r(26  +  r0  ■ 

^^*-"' ''''''•^^■'  ~r(2a)r(26)r(a  +  6)n=o        /i !  r(c  +  «)r(2c- l+«) 

(Clausen,  Crelle,  ill.) 

12.  Shew  that  if  |  :r  |  <  1  and  | ;r  (1  -.r)  |  < |, 

F{2a,  2^;a  +  ^+^;x}  =  F{a,  ^;  a  +  ^  +  i ;  4^(1 -«)}.  (Kummer.) 

13.  Deduce  from  example  12  that 

i^{2a,  2,3,  -  +  0  +  hh-^j^^jr^j:^jy 

14.  Shew  that,  if  w  =  e*'^'  and  /i  (a)  <  1, 

F(a,3a-l;2a;  -  o,^)  =  3^'^  -  ^  exp  {^.rt  (3a  -  1)}  |;  Igf,^)^^  ' 

F(a,3a-1;  2a;   -  co)  =  3^°  '  ^  exp  {^^^  (1  -  3a)}  ^  |3°LV)7(| ' 

(Watson.) 

15.  Shew  that 

r(i)T(n  +  S) 
F{-^n,-in  +  Ji;n  +  ^;  -  J)  =  (|)«  ^,A|L,|_±|j . 

(Heymann,  Zeitschrift  f.  Math.  XLiv.) 

16.  If  {l-x)"^^"^  F{2a,2^;2y;x)^l-\-Bx  +  Cx'^  +  Da^  +  ..., 
shew  that 

F{a,(i;y  +  \;x)F{y-a,y-^;y  +  ^;x) 

7+i         (y+i)(y+'l)  (y+i)(y+^)(7+l) 

(Cayley,  PA«7.  il/agr.  Ser.  4,  Vol.  xvi.) 

17.  If  the  function  F{a,  ^,  ^',  y,  x,  y)  be  defined  by  the  equation 


F{a,^,^',y;x,y)=_-~^ ^  f    u''-'  {I -u)y-'^-'  {I  -  uxy^  {l  -uy)-^'  du, 

I  (a)  r  (y  -  a)  Jo 

then  shew  that  between  F  and  any  three  of  its  eight  contiguous  functions 

F(a±l),    >(/3±l),     i^(/3'±l),     i^(y±l), 

there  exists  a  homogeneous  linear  equation,  whose  coefficients  are  polynomials  in  x  and  y. 

(Le  Vavasseur.) 


THE   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  293 

18.  Tf-y-a-j8<0,  shew  that,  as  07-^1-0, 

and  that  if  y  —  a  —  ^=0,  the  corresponding  approximate  formula  is 

(Math.  Trip.  1893.) 

19.  Shew  that  when  |  .r  |  <  1, 


f{x+,0+,x-,0-)    , 


where  c  denotes  a  point  on  the  straight  line  joining  the  points  0,  x,  the  initial  arguments 
of  V  -.r  and  of  v  are  the  same  as  that  of  a;,  and  arg  (1  -  v)  ^-0  as  v  -*0. 

(Pochhammer.) 

20.  If,  when  |  arg  (1  -  a?)  |  <  2n-, 

^  ^^^  ==  2^- /^l  ^^  ^  - ')  ^  ^H  «)}' (1  -  ^)*  ^«, 
and,  when  |  arga?  |  <  27r, 

by  changing  the  variable  s  in  the  integral  or  otherwise,  obtain  the  following  relations : 
K{a;)  =  K'{l-x),  if  |  arg(l-^)  |  <  tt. 

K(l-x)  =  E'{x),  if  |arg:y|<7r. 

K{a;)  =  (l-a;)-^K(^-^y  if  |  arg(l-^)|  <  ,r. 

Kil-x)=x-^K(^^y  if  |arg.ri<7r. 

K'{x)=x-^K'il/x),  if   |arg^!<7r. 

^'(1  -x)  =  (l-x)-i  K'  (]4^.)  ,  if  I  arg(l  -^)  |  <  tt.  (Barnes.) 

21.  With  the  notation  of  the  preceding  example,  obtain  the  following  results  : 

^^'<^'=- J,  fit  T"  h^-^'-'^'+^G  -  ^+--2»)}' 

when  I  a;  I  <  1,  I  arg^  I  <  TT ;  and 

K{x)=  i;.i{-x)- ^K{\lx)^{-x) -^K'  (l/.r), 

when  I  arg  (  -^)  |  <  tt,  the  ambiguous  sign  being  the  same  as  the  sign  of  I{x). 

(Barnes.) 


294  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIV 

22.  Hypergeometric  series  in  two  variables  are  defined  by  the  equations 

i^i  (a ;  /3,  ^' ;  y  ;  ^,  j/)=   2    ^^^^^  ^-y", 
m,  n  11''  •  •I'  •  7m  +  n 

i^'a  (a,  a',  ^,  ^'  ;  y  ;  ^,  3/)=   2    ^^^f"^.    x^y\ 

m,n  mini   ym  +  n 
»i,  Ji  '"'  •  "'  •  /m  yn 

where  a,„  =  a  (a+ l)...(a  +  wi~- 1),  and  2  means  2      2. 

m,  n  m=0  Ji=0 

Obtain  the  diflferential  equations 

and  four  similar  equations,  derived  from  these  by  interchanging  x  with  3/  and  a,  fi,  y  with 
a',  /3',  y'  when  a',  /S',  y'  occur  in  the  corresponding  series. 

(Appell,  Comptes  Rendus,  xc.) 

23.  If  a  is  negative,  and  if 

a=  —v\-a, 

where  v  is  an  integer  and  a  is  positive,  shew  that 
V{x)T{a)_    %     \  Rn 


,                                              o       (-)»(a-l)(a-2)...(a-»)^,        ^ 
where  Rn  =  ^ — -^ ^-^^-1 — ^ Cf  ( -  n). 


^wK'-^.-^OO^-^.) 0^^)' 


O^^  (^)  =  ^i^^)__^l_5) .  (Hermite,  Cre^^e,  xcii. 


24.     When  a  <  1,  shew  that 


Tix)Tia-x)^    2      ^'^-     2         ^ 


T (a)  n,=i  J7+%      M=i  .3?-a-«' 

where  /£„  = — ^^ ; — ^^ . 

n  I 

25.     When  a  >  1,  and  v  and  a  are  respectively  the  integral  and  [fractional  parts  of 
a,  shew  that 

T{x)T(a-x)^    -    0{.v)_pj,_    I    G'(^)p^+^ 


T  (a)  n=l     x+n         n=l    x-a-n 

\_X-a      X-a-\  X-  a  —  v\-\j 


THE  HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  295 


where  «(,)  =(i.?)  (:  ._i_)  ...  (i  ._^^^) 

(-)»«(a  +  l)...(a  +  »-l) 


and  pn — 


n\ 

(Hermite,  Crelle,  xcii.) 

26.  If 

/  f^  »  ,,^-^  _  r  -^Cy  +  ^  +  ^-l)  .    ^  x{x  +  l)(j/  +  v+n-l)(2/  +  v  +  n) 

where  «.  is  a  positive  integer  and  „(7i,  nC^, ...  are  binomial  coefficients,  shew  that 

f  (r  ,/  ..s_'^ij/)'^i^-x  +  n)T{x  +  v)T{v  +  n) 
JnK^,y,i^)     Y{^-x)T(jf  +  n)T{v)V{x  +  v  +  n)' 

(Saalschiitz,  ZeitschHft  f.  Math,  xxxv.) 

[See  also  Dougall,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  xxv.,  for  a  large  number  of  similar 
results.] 

27.  If         Fia,^,y;  S,  . ;  ^)=l  +  _.,+      S  (§+])  ^(^  +  1)  l72"     *  +-' 
shew  that,  when  Ti  (S  +  e  —  f  a  -  1)  >  0,  then 

i^(a,a-S+l,a-.  +  l,S,.,   l)-2       r  (8-|a)  T  (e-Ja)  T  (i  +  i«)  T  (S  +  f -a-1) ' 

(A.  C.  Dixon,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxxv.) 

28.  Shew  that,  if  i?  (a)  <  g,  then 

,        =°     fa(a  +  l)...(a  +  %-l)P  r(l-fa) 

(Morley,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxxiv.) 


CHAPTER   XV 

LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS 

■    .  _.     I 
15'1.     Definition  of  Legendre  polynomials. 

Consider  the  expression  (1  —  2zh  +  A^)  ~  ^ ;  when  i  '2zh  —  h?\<l,  it  can  be 
expanded  in  a  series  of  ascending  powers  of  2zh  —  ¥.  If,  in  addition, 
I  2zh\  +  \hf<l,  these  powers  can  be  multiplied  out  and  the  resulting  series 
rearranged  in  any  manner  (§  2*52)  since  the  expansion  of  [1  —  {|  2zh  \  +  \h  p}]~^ 
in  powers  of  |  2zh \  +  \h\^  then  converges  absolutely.  In  particular,  if  we 
rearrange  in  powers  of  h,  we  get 

(1  -2zh  +  h')-i  =  P,{z)  +  hP,{z)  +  h-'P.iz)  +  h'P,(z)  +  ..., 
where 

Po(^)  =  l,   P^{z)  =  z,   P,(z)  =  l(Sz^'-l),   P,{z)  =  l{5z'-Sz), 

P,  (z)  =  I  {S5z'  -  SOz^  +  3),   P,  (z)  =  I  (6Sz'  -  70z'  +  15z), 
and  generally 

p  (,^  =    (2>0'    L«  _  ^  (^Lull^n-.  .   nS^v-l)(n-  2)(n-S)  _      1 

"^^     2'\{niy\         2(2/1-1)         ^    2.4.(2n-l)(2w-3)  ■"] 

=  I  (_Y  (2n-2r)l 

r=o          2''.rl{n-r)l{n-2r)l 

where  m  =  ^  n  or  ^{n  —  1),  whichever  is  an  integer. 

If  a,  b  and  8  be  positive  constants,  b  being  so  small  that  2ab  +  b^  ^  1  —  S,  the  expansion 
of  (1  —  2zh+h'^) " 2  converges  uniformly  with  respect  to  z  and  h  when  |  2 1  ^a,  |  A  |  ^ 6. 

The  expressions  P^  (z),  P^  (z),  . . . ,  which  are  clearly  all  polynomials  in  z, 
are  known  as  Legendre  polynomials*,  Pn{z)  being  called  the  Legendre 
polynomial  of  degree  n. 

It  will  appear  later  (§  15-2)  that  these  polynomials  are  particular  cases  of  a  more 
extensive  class  of  functions  known  as  Legendre  functions. 

*  Other  names  are  Legendre  coefficients  and  Zonal  Harmonics.  They  were  introduced  into 
analysis  in  1784  by  Legendre,  Memoires  par  divers  savans,  x.  (1785). 


15'1-1512]  LEOENDRE   FUNCTIONS  297 

Example  1.     By  giving  z  special  values  in  the  expression  (1  -  2«A+ A*)  ~  *,  shew  that 
/'„(1)  =  1,  P„(-l)  =  (-l)» 

Example  2.     From  the  expansion 

shew  that 

1.3.(2»)(2«-2)     „        ,        .s>,,      1 
+  2:4.(2Lli(2.-3)^^"^(^-'^^  +  -r 
Deduce  that,  if  ^  be  a  real  angle, 

,„,       ^,,      1.3...2n-l    L        l.(2«)       „        1.3.(2«)(2?i-2)      „,       ] 

so  that  I  P„  (cos  e)\^l.  (Legendre.) 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  when  2=  —  ^, 

Pn=PoPu-PlP^n-l  +  P2P2n-2-.:+P2nPo'  (Clare,  1905.) 

15*11.     Rodrigues'*  formula  for  the  Legendre  polynomials. 
It  is  evident  that,  when  n  is  an  integer, 

i^«^^^^  ~rf^M.=o^    ^  r\{n-r)l'       ] 


dz 


r=o         r!(w-7-)!  (ri-2r)! 


where  7/1  =  571  or  ^(ti—  1),  the  coefficients  of  negative  powers  of  z  vanishing. 
From  the  general  formula  for  Pn  (z)  it  follows  at  once  that 

this  result  is  known  as  Rodrigues'  formula. 

Example.     Shew  that  P„  (2)  =  0  has  n  real  roots,  all  lying  between  ±1. 

15*12.     Schldjiisf  integral  for  Pn  (z). 

From  the  result  of  §  1511  combined  with  §  5"22,  it  follows  at  once  that 

^"^^^      27riJc2-{t-zr-^^'^^' 
where  (7  is  a  contour  which  encircles  the  point  z  once  counter-clockwise ;  this 
result  is  called  Schldfli's  integral  formula  for  the  Legendre  polynomials. 

*  Correnp.  sur  Vecole  poly  technique,  iii.  (1814-1816),  pp.  361-385. 
t  Schlatli,  Ueber  die  zwei  Heine'schen  Kugelfunctionen,  Bern,  1881. 


298  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

15*13.     Legendre's  differential  equation. 

We  shall  now  prove  that  the  function  u  =  P^  {z)  is  a  solution  *of  the 
differential  equation 

which  is  called  Legendre's  differential  equation  for  functions  of  degree  n. 

For,   substituting   Schlafli's   integral   in    the    left-hand    side,   we    have, 
by  §  5-22, 


(w  +  1)  r  d  [(f^-if+'i 


1'jri.2'^Jcdt\{t-zY-^A     ' 
and  this  integral  is  zero,  since  (t^  —  1)'*+'  (t  -  ^•)~'*-2  resumes  its  original  value 
after  describing  G  when  n  is  an  integer.     The  Legendre  polynomial  therefore 
satisfies  the  differential  equation. 

The  result  just  obtained  can  be  written  in  the  form 

A  (/-,      .,x  dPn  (z)] 
dz 


i^(l-,^^^\  +  n(n^l)P,iz)  =  0. 


It  will  be  observed  that  Legendre's  equation  is  a  particular  case  of  Riemann's  equation, 
defined  by  the  scheme 


drp    M 

Example  1.     Shew  that  the  equation  satisfied  by  —  ,"       is  defined  by  the  scheme 


Example  2.     If  z^=r],  shew  that  Legendre's  differential  equation  takes  the  form 

dr}'^         [2rj       l-i;J    dr]        4rj  (l  -  rj) 

Shew  that  this  is  a  hypergeometric  equation. 

Example  3.     Deduce  Schlafli's  integral  for  the  Legendre  functions,  as  a  limiting  case  of 
the  general  hypergeometric  integral  of  §  14-6. 

[Since  Legendre's  equation  is  given  by  the  scheme 

^-1    .    1    I 

P<      0     n  +  l     0    z\, 
0      -n     0 


15-13,  1514]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  299 

the  integral  suggested  is 

Urn  (l-0"*'  (    («+l)"(<-l)"  lim   6-0    "^  {t-z)-^-''cU 

=   I      (i2-l)"(«-2)-«-l0^^ 

taken  round  a  contour  C  such  that  the  integrand  resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing 
it ;  and  this  gives  Schlafli's  integral.] 

15*14.     The  integral  properties  of  the  Legendre  polynomials. 
We  shall  now  shew  that* 

1,      2w  -I- 1         ^  ^ 

Let  {u]r  denote  ^ ;  then  if  r  <  n,  {(z'  -  1)%.  is  divisible  by  (z'  -  l)"-*- ; 

and  so,  if  r  <  n,  {(z^  —  lY]r  vanishes  when  z  =1  and  when  z  =  —  1. 

Now,  of  the  two  numbers  m,  n,  let  m  be  that  one  which  is  equal  to  or 
greater  than  the  other. 

Then,  integrating  by  parts  continually, 

'     {{z'-ir]m{(z'-ir]ndz 


{{Z^  -  irU-^  {(Z'  -  ir}«     \^  -  W  {{^'  -  l)'"}m-a  {{Z'  -  If 


dz 


=  {-T  f     (^'  -  1)""  K^'  -  l)"}n+m  dz, 

since  {(^-  -  l)"»}m-i,  K^'  "  '^T]m-2,  •••  vanish  at  both  limits. 

Now,  when  m  >  n,  {{z^-  l)"}w,+n  =  0,  since  differential  coefficients  of  (z^-1)'' 
of  order  higher  than  2n  vanish ;  and  so,  when  m  is  greater  than  n,  it  follows 
from  Rodrigues'  formula  that 

['  Pm{z)Pn(z)dz  =  0. 
When  m  =  n,  we  have,  by  the  transformation  just  obtained, 

j   ^  {(z^  -  iy%  {(z^ -  ir]n  dz  =  (-)"  j_^(z^  -  ir  ^,  (z'  -  1)"  dz 

=  (2/0!  [    (1-^T^^ 

=  2 .  (2n)  \[  (1  -  z^y  dz 
Jo 

rhtr 

=  2.(2/?)!         sm^^'+'-ede 

Jo 

2.4... 2/7 

_2.(2w).^^^   --2,7+-^)' 

*  These  two  results  were  given  by  Legendre  in  1784  and  1789. 


300  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 


/: 


where  cos  6  has  been  written  for  z  in  the  integral ;   hence,  by  Rodrigues' 
formula, 

j_i^    "^  ^^  *       (2".w!)Hiiw+l)!      271  +  1* 

We  have  therefore  obtained  both  the  required  results. 

It  follows  that,  in  the  language  of  Chapter  xi,  the  functions  (w  +  D^  P„  (z)  are  normal 
orthogonal  functions  for  the  range  (  —  1,  1). 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  \i  x  >  0, 

(cosh2^-z)-ip„(3)c?2  =  2~*(w  +  i)-ie-(2»  +  i)*. 

(Clare,  1908.) 
Example  2.     If  /=  f  *  P,„  (2)  P„  {z)  dz,  then 

(i)      /=l/(2?i  +  l)  {m  =  n\ 

(ii)     /=0  (m- 71  even), 

i-T'^*'  n^  m^ 

(ni)     /= -—- — -—^ — ^-— :.,  ,    .,.,  ,    .,„         (7i  =  2v  +  l,  m  =  2u). 

(Clare,  1902.) 
15'2.     Legendre  functions. 

Hitherto  we  have  supposed  that  the  degree  n  of  Pn{z)  is  a  positive 
integer ;  in  fact,  P„  {z)  has  not  been  defined  except  when  n  is  a  positive 
integer.  We  shall  now  see  how  P„  {z)  can  be  defined  for  values  of  n  which 
are  not  necessarily  integers. 

An  analogy  can  be  drawn  from  the  theory  of  the  Gamma-function.  The  expression 
z\  as  ordinarily  defined  (viz.  as  0  (0- 1)  (2-2) ...  2 . 1)  has  a  meaning  only  for  positive 
integral  values  of  z ;  but  when  the  Gamma-function  has  been  introduced,  2 !  can  be  defined 
to  be  r  (2  +  1),  and  so  a  function  2  I  will  exist  for  values  of  2  which  are  not  integers. 

Referring  to  §  15*13,  we  see  that  the  differential  equation 
is  satisfied  by  the  expression 


n  _^2)  ^  _  2^  ^  +  n  (71  +  l)7t  =  0 
dz'^  dz 


u^j-.(  j':-^>:.di. 


27ri  j  c  2"  {t  -  ^)"+i 

even  when  n  is  not  a  positive  integer,  provided  that  C  is  a  contour  such  that 
(^2  —  1)^*+!  {t  —  z)~^~^  resumes  its  original  value  after  describing  C. 

Suppose  then  that  n  is  no  longer  taken  to  be  a  positive  integer. 

The  function  (t^  —  1)"+^  {t  —  z)~^''~'^  has  three  singularities,  namely  the 
points  ^=1,  ^  =  —  1,  t  =  z;  and  it  is  clear  that  after  describing  a  circuit  round 
the  point  ^  =  1  counter-clockwise,  the  function  resumes  its  original  value 
multiplied  by  e^'^*  '"+^* ;  while  after  describing  a  circuit  round  the  point  t  =  z 
counter-clockwise,  the   function    resumes    its    original    value    multiplied    by 


15'2,  15*21]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  301 

g!hri(-n-2)  jf  therefore  G  he  n  contour  enclosing  the  points  t  =  l  and  t  =  z, 
but  not  enclosing  the  point  t  =  —l,  then  the  function  (t^  —  1)^+^  (t  —  z)~^*~^ 
will,  after  describing  C,  resume  its  original  value.  Hence  Legendre's  differential 
equation  for  functions  of  degree  n, 

,,       „.d'^u      a   du        ,       ,. 
is  satisfied  hy  the  expression  _ 


27rtj. 


dt, 


for  all  values  of  n ;  the  many-valued  functions  will  be  specified  precisely 
by  taking  A  on  the  real  axis  on  the  right  of  the  point  t  =  l  (and  on  the 
right  of  2  if  z  be  real),  and  by  taking  arg(^— 1)  =  arg(^  +  1)  =  0  and 
|arg(^-2:)|  <  TT  at  ^. 

This  expression  will  be  denoted  by  Pn  (z),  and  will  be  termed  the  Legendre 
function  of  degree  n  of  the  first  kind. 

We  have  thus  defined  a  function  Pn  {z),  the  definition  being  valid  whether 
n  is  an  integer  or  not. 

The  function  P„  {z)  thus  defined  is  not  a  one-valued  function  of  z ;  for  we  might  take 
two  contours  as  shewn  in  the  figure,  and  the  integrals  along  them  would  not  be  the  same ; 


to  make  the  contour  integral  unique,  make  a  cut  in  the  t  plane  from  —  1  to  —  qo  along  the 
real  axis ;  this  involves  making  a  similar  cut  in  the  z  plane,  for  if  the  cut  were  not  made, 
then,  as  z  varied  continuously  across  the  negative  part  of  the  real  axis,  the  contour  would 
not  vary  continuously. 

It  follows,  by  §  5-31,  that  /*„(2)  is  analytic  throughout  the  cut  plane. 
15*21.     The  Recurrence  Formulae. 

We  proceed  to  establish  a  group  of  formulae  (which  are  really  particular 
cases  of  the  relations  between  contiguous  Riemann  P-functions  which  were 
shewn  to  exist  in  §  14'7)  connecting  Legendre  functions  of  different  degrees. 

If  C  be  the  contour  of  §  15'2,  we  have* 

^n  {Z)        2U+ Vi  j  ^  (^  _  ^y.4-1  ^^'       ^  n  {2)  -  2«+i^^-  I  ^  ^^  _-^^^,  dt. 
*  We  write  P„'  (2)  for  ~  P„  {z). 


302  THE    TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

^°"        dt  w 

and  so  integrating 


°^  dt  (t  -  ^)«+i  ~  {t-  ^)"+i  (t  -  ^)«+2 


t(f'-ir^^       f   (t^-l)n+^^^^ 


0  =  2  f  *^^^::^dt-[  ^^^ 


Therefore 

2'*+i7ri  J  c  («  -  ^)"  2"+^7rz  j  c  (i^  -  ^)'*+'  2'^+i7rt  J  c  (t  -  zf+' 

Consequently 

P„«W-.P„W  =  2J,„.J;|^*    (A). 

Differentiating*,  we  get 

P'n+,  (Z)  -  zP'n  (Z)  -  Pn  (Z)  =  nP^  (z), 

and  SO  P'n+i{z)- zP'r,(z)  =  {n+ 1)  P.„{z)     (I). 

This  is  the  first  of  the  required  formulae. 
Next,  expanding  the  equation 

f  ditii-iy) 

Jcdt\(t-zf\ 
we  find  that 

h ^  dt  +  2>i       -^ ^  dt-n       ,-f -^  dt  =  0. 

Writing  (^-  —  1)  +  1  for  t-  and  {t  —  z)  +  z  for  t  in  this  equation,  we  get 

Using  (A),  we  have  at  once 

{n  +  1)  [Pn+,  {Z)  -  zPn  {Z)]  +  nPn-^  {z)  -  UzP^  {z)  =  0. 

That  is  to  say 

{n  +  1)  P„+,  {z)  -  (2n  +  1)  zP,,  {z)  +  nP,_,  {z)  =  0  (II), 

a  relation  f  connecting  three  Legendre  functions  of  consecutive  degrees.    This 
is  the  second  of  the  required  formulae. 

We  can  deduce  the  remaining  formulae  from  (I)  and  (II)  thus : 

Differentiating  (II),  we  have 

(n  +  1)  [Fn^,  {z)  -  zP\  (z)]  -  n  [zP'n  (z)  -  P^i  (z)]  -  {2n  +  1)  P,,  {z)  =  0. 
Using  (I)  to  eliminate  P  n+i  {z),  and  then  dividing  by  j  n,  we  get 

zP\,{z)-P'n_,(z)  =  nPn{z) (III). 

*  The  process  of  differentiating  under  the  sign  of  integration  is  readily  justified  by  §  i-2. 

t  Heine  states  that  this  relation  is  due  to  Gauss. 

J  If  71  =  0,  we  have  Fq(z)  =  1,  P_^  (2)  =  !,  and  tlae  result  (III)  is  true  but  trivial. 


15-21]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  303 

Adding  (I)  and  (HI)  we  get 

P'n+,(z)-P'n_,(z)  =  (2n4-l)Pn(z)     (IV). 

Lastly,  writing  n-  1  for  n  in  (I)  and  eliminating  P'n-i  (z)  between  the 
equation  so  obtained  and  (III),  we  have 

(z'-l)P'r,(z)  =  mPr,(z)-nPn-^(z) (V). 

The  formulae  (I) — (V)  are  called  the  recurrence  formulae. 

The  above  proof  holds  whether  n  is  an  integer  or  not,  i.e.  it  is  applicable  to  the  general 
Legendre  functions.  Another  proof  which,  however,  only  applies  to  the  case  when  n  is 
a  positive  integer  (i.e.  is  only  appUcable  to  the  Legendre  polynomials)  is  as  follows : 

Write  F=(l-2/i3  +  A2)-i. 

Then,  equating  coefficients*  of  powers  of  h  in  the  expansions  on  each  side  of  the 
equation 

{\-^hz+h^)^^={z-h)V, 

we  have  nP„  (z)  -  {2n-\) zP^.^  {z)^{n-\) P„_2 (3)  =  0, 

which  is  the  formula  (II). 

Similarly,  equating  coefficients*  of  powers  of  h  in  the  expansions  on  each  side  of  the 
equation 

we  have  z-£J  -  -«^:=nP,  (.), 

which  is  the  formula  (III).     The  others  can  be  deduced  from  these. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  for  all  values  of  n, 

j^{z{PJ  +  P'n^i)-2PnPn^i}=-{^n  +  3)  P^„^,-{2n+l)  P,,K 

(Hargreaves.) 
Example  2.     If  Mn{x)  =  \  (-j-j   (ze*^  eosech  2)  , 

dM  Lv)  P 

shew  that  — J'       =nMn^i{x)    and     I      Mn{x)dx  =  0.  (Trinity, 

ax  J  _i 

Example  3.     Prove  that  if  ??i  and  n  are  integers  such  that  ?«^«,  both  being  even 

or  both  odd, 

fl     f/p     ri  p 

/       ^x   ^  '^^' ^ '"  ^''* ■*■  ^^*  ^^^*^^'  ^^^^-^ 

Example  4.     Prove  that,  if  m,  n  are  integers  and  m  ^  n, 

x{l+(-)"-^"'}. 
(Math.  Trip.  1897.) 

*  The  reader  is  recommended  to  justify  these  processes. 


1900.) 


304  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

15'211.     The    expression   of   any  polynomial   as   a   series   of   Legendre 
polynomials. 

hetfn  (z)  be  a  polynomial  of  degree  n  in  z. 

Then  it  is  always  possible  to  choose  ao,  a^,  ...  a„  so  that 

fn  (z)  =  aoPo  (z)  +  a^Pi  (z)  +  ...  +  anPn  {z), 

for,  on  equating  coefficients  of  z^,  z'^~^,  ...  on  each  side,  we  obtain  equations 
which  determine  «„,  a^-i,  •••  uniquely  in  turn,  in  terms  of  the  coefficients  of 
powers  of  z  in  /„  (z). 

To  determine  a^,  a^,  ...  an   in    the    most   simple    manner,   multiply  the 
identity  by  Pr{z),  and  integrate.     Then,  by  §  1514, 

when  r  =  0,  1,  2,  ...  w ;  when  r>  n,  the  integral  on  the  left  vanishes. 

Example  1.     Given  2"  =  aoA  (2)  +  «i  A  {z)  +  ...  +  anPn  (^X  to  determine  ao>  ^\^  •••  ««• 
[Equate  coefl&cients  of  2"  on  both  sides ;  this  gives 

2».(n!)2 
"^"^    {2n)\    ' 

Let  In,m=  \      z^Pm  {^)  dz,  SO  that,  by  the  result  just  given, 

"•'"      (2w  +  l)!  • 

Now  when  n  —  m'm  odd,  /„,  ^  is  the  integral  of  an  odd  function  with  limits  + 1,  and  so 
vanishes ;  and  /„,  ^  ^l^o  vanishes  when  n  —  m  is  negative  and  even. 

To  evaluate  /„, »»  when  n  —  m  is  a  positive  even  integer,  we  have  from  Legendre's 
equation 

=  -[2"(l-^^)i^,„'(2)]^^  +^i  j'^Z--^{l-Z^)P,r:iz)dz 

=  n[z--^{l-z-')P,n{z)J  ^~nj'  ^{in-l)zr^-^-{n-\-l)z^}P,^{z)dz, 

on  integrating  by  parts  twice ;  and  so 

m  (m  + 1)  /„,  ,„  =  7Z  («  + 1)  /„,  ,n-n  {n-\)  /„_2,  w 

Therefore 

J ^L^z2) r 

^"•'"~(n-m)(rt  +  m  +  l)    "-'^•"' 

%  («—  1)  ...  (m  +  1)  - 


{7i-m){n-2-m)  ...2.{n+m  +  l)in  +  m-l)  ...{2m  +  3)   *"•  "" 
by  carrying  on  the  process  of  reduction. 


15-21 1,  1522]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  305 

Consequently  /,. ^=  (^^_a^) ;  (^^  J+i), ' 

and  so  «to=0,  when  n-  m  is  odd  or  negative, 

a„.  =  Vi f — s .  /     ^TTT-  when  n-  w  is  even  and  positive.] 

(^n-^m):  (ti  +  w  +  I)!  ^  ■• 

Example  2.  Express  cos  «^  as  a  series  of  Legendre  polynomials  of  cos  6  when  n  is  an 
integer. 

Example  3.     Evaluate  the  integrals 

(St  John's,  1899.) 
Example  4.     Shew  that 

J  Jl  -^2)  {P„'  (2))2^,=?!|^^) .  (Trinity,  1894.) 

Example  5.     Shew  that 

nP„(cos(9)=    2  cosr^i'„_r(cos^).  (St  John's,  1898.) 

r=l 

Example  6.     If  «„  =  I      (1  -22)»P2m  (2)  c?2,  where  m<n,  shew  that 

(%-m)(2?i  +  2m+l)w„  =  2«-«„_i.  (Trinity,  1895.) 

15*22.     Murphy's  expression*  of  Pn{z)  as  a  hypergeometric  function. 

Since  (§  15"13)  Legendre's  equation  is  a  particular  case  of  Riemann's 
equation,  it  is  to  be  expected  that  a  formula  can  be  obtained  giving  P„  {z)  in 
terms  of  hypergeometric  functions.  To  determine  this  formula,  take  the 
integral  of  §  15"2  for  the  Legendre  function  and  suppose  that  1 1  —  2:  j  <  2 ;  to 
fix  the  contour  C,  let  h  be  any  constant  such  that  0  <  8  <  1,  and  suppose  that 
z  is  such  that  1 1  —  ^  j  ^  2  (1  —  8) ;  and  then  take  G  to  be  the  circle  f 

i  1  -  « I  =  2  -  S. 

Since    ^j I  :$  ^ — k-  <  1,  v^e  may  expand  {t  —  zy^'^  into  the  uniformly 

convergent  series  J 

Substituting  this  result  in  Schlafli's  integral,  and  integrating  term-by- 
term  (§  4"7),  we  get 


P   (z\=  S  (^-1X0^  +  1)0^  +  2). ..(n+r)  p  +  .-H     (^2_i)n 
""^  ^     r%'l''+'iri  r\  J  A  {t-lf+'- 


^n+^+rdt 


^  I  (z-iy.{n+l)(n  +  2)...(n+  r) 
r=o  2-.(r!)-^ 


*  Electricity  (1883).     Murphy's  result  was  obtained  only  for  the  Legendre  polynomials. 

t  This  circle  contains  the  points  t  =  l,  t  =  z. 

X  The  series  terminates  if  ji  be  a  negative  integer. 

W.   M.   A.  20 


306  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

by  §  5-22.     Since  arg  (^  +  1)  =  0  when  t  =  l,  we  get 

(t  +  l)n        =2''-^n(n-l)...{n-r  +  l), 
at  jt=i 

and  so,  when  1 1  —  ^^  |  ^  2  (1  —  8)  <  2,  we  have 

p    .._^    {n  +  l)(n  +  2)  ...  (n  +  r)  .(-n)  {1  -n)  ...(r-1 -n)  (i      i   V 

This  is  the  required  expression ;  it  supplies  a  reason  (§  14'53)  why  the  cut 
from  —  1  to  —  00    could  not  be  avoided  in  §  15'2. 

Corollary.     From  this  result,  it  is  obvious  that,  for  all  values  of  n, 

Note.     When  «  is  a  positive  integer,  the  result  gives  the  Legendre  polynomial  as 
a  polynomial  in  1  —  s  with  simple  coefficients. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  m  be  a  positive  integer, 

[d^-^'Pm.n{t^)\        _      r(2m  +  n  +  2)  fTrinitv   1907 ) 

1       ^"-  +  1      7^=i-2'»  +  i(m  +  l)!r(«)-  (irmity,  1907.) 

Example  2.     Shew  that  the  Legendre  polynomial  P„  (cos  6)  is  equal  to 
{-YF{n->r\,  -n;  I ;  coa'^  ^6), 
and  to  cos" \e F{-n,  -n;\;  tan^ \e).  (Murphy.) 

15*23.     Laplace s  integrals'^  for  Pn{z)- 

We  shall  next  shew  that,  for  all  values  of  n  and  for  certain  values  of  z, 
the  Legendre  function  Pn  {z)  can  be  represented  by  the  integral  (called 
Laplace  s  first  integral) 

-  \    [z-\-  (^2  -  1)*  cos  <f)|''  d<b. 

(A)     Proof  applicable  only  to  the  Legendre  polynomials. 
When  n  is  a  positive  integer,  we  have,  by  §  15'12, 

"V  ;     2^+Wi  J  c  {t  -  .^^''+' 


■zf 

where  C  is  any  contour  which  encircles  the  point  z  counter-clockwise. 
Take  G  to  be  the  circle  with  centre  z  and  radius  |^^^  — Ij^.  so  that,  on  C, 
t  —  z  +  {z^  —  l)^e^'^,  where  <^  may  be  taken  to  increase  from  —  tt  to  tt. 

*  Mecanique  Celeste,  Livre  xi.   Chap.  '2.     For  the  contour  employed   in    this    section,  and 
for  some  others  introduced  later  in  the  chapter,  we  are  indebted  to  Mr  J.  Hodgkinson. 


15-23]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  307 

Making  the  substitution,  we  have,  for  all  values  of  z, 


d<f> 


=  ^r- f   {z -{■  (z- -  1)^  COS  <j>Y' d<b 

=  -\      [Z^  {Z""  -  l)i  COS  <^}»  C?<^, 


since  the  integrand  is  an  even  function  of  ^.  The  choice  of  the  branch  of 
the  two- valued  function  {z^  —  1)^  is  obviously  a  matter  of  indifference. 

(B)     Proof  applicable  to  the  Leg endre  functions,  where  n  is  unrestricted. 

Make  the  same  substitution  as  in  (A)  in  Schlafli's  integral  defining 
P„(2^);  it  is,  however,  necessary  in  addition  to  verify  that  ^  =  1  is  inside  the 
contour  and  ^  =  —  1  outside  it,  and  it  is  also  necessary  that  we  should  specify 
the  branch  of  {z  +  (z^  -  1)^  cos  <f)]'^,  which  is  now  a  many-valued  function  of  cf). 

The  conditions  that  t=l,  t  =  —  l  should  be  inside  and  outside  C  re- 
spectively are  that  the  distances  of  z  from  these  points  should  be  less  and 
greater  than  |  ^^^  _  l  |i.  These  conditions  are  both  satisfied  ifj^  —  1|<  |0  +  1|, 
which  gives  R  (z)  >  0,  and  so  (giving  arg  z  its  principal  value)  we  must  have 

{argzlK-Tr. 

Therefore  P„  (z)  =  ^  f "   [z  +  (z'  -  1)^  cos  <f)}«  d6, 

where  the  value  of  arg  [z  +  {f-  —  1)^  cos  ^|  is  specified  by  the  fact  that  it 
[being  equal  to  arg  (^^— 1)  — arg (^  —  2^)]  is  numerically  less  than  tt  when  t  is 
on  the  real  axis  and  on  the  right  of  z  (see  §  15*2). 

Now  as  <^  increases  from  -  tt  to  tt,  2  +  (32  — 1)^  cos0  describes  a  straight  line  in  the 

Argand  diagram  going  from  2  — (z^  — 1)^  to  z-\-{^^  —  \Y  and  back  again;  and  since  this  line 

does  not  pass  through  the  origin*,  arg  {z  +  (0^- 1)^  cosc^}  does  not  change  by  so  much  as 
TT  on  the  range  of  integration. 

Now  suppose  that  the  branch  of  {2  +  (0^  -  1)  cos  (^}"  which  has  to  be  taken  is  such  that 
it  reduces  to  z^e^''^^'^  (where  k  is  an  integer)  when  ^  =  \ir. 

tnkni     r^ 

Then  p,^(^)  =  ___  {2  +  (22-i)4cos</)}«(;0, 

^tr         J     -TT 

where  now  that  branch  of  the  many-valued  function  is  taken  which  is  equal  to  2"  when 

Now  make  2^-1  by  a  path  which  avoids  the  zeros  of  /*„  (z) ;  since  P,j  {z)  and  the 
integral  are  analytic  functions  of  z  when  I  args  j  <  ^tt,  k  does  not  change  as  z  describes  the 
path.     And  so  we  get  e^"''"'  =  l. 

*  It  only  does  so  if  2  is  a  pure  imagiuary;  and  such  values  of  z  have  been  excluded. 

20—2 


308  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

Therefore,  when  |  arg  ^  |  <  -  tt  and  ?i  is  unrestricted, 

where  arg  [z  +  {z^  —  1)^  cos  </>}  is  to  be  taken  equal  to  arg  z  when  <f)  =  ^7r. 

This  expression  for  P„  (z),  which  may,  again,  obviously  be  written 

-  r  {z  +  (z'-  -  1)^  cos  (^}«  d<b, 
T  Jo 

is  known  as  Laplace's  first  integral  for  P,j  (z). 

Corollary.     From  §  16'22  corollary,  it  is  evident  that,  when  |  arg  2  |  <  ^tt, 

a  result,  due  to  Jacobi  {Crelle,  xxvi.),  known  as  Laplace^ s  second  integral  for  P„  (s). 

Example  1.     Obtain  Laplace's  tirst  integral  for  the  Legendre  polynomials  by  con- 
sidering 

2   A"    f  "  {«+  (22  -  l)i  cos  (/)}»  (^0, 

»=o      j  0 
and  using  §  6'21  example  1. 

Example  2.     Shew,  by  direct  differentiation,  that  Laplace's  integral  is  a  solution  of 
Legendre's  equation. 

Example  3.     If  s  <  1,  ]  A  |  <  1  and 

(1  -  2/i  cos  e-\-h?)-*=  2  6„ cos n6, 

n=0 

shew  that  ^'-^^  j„  (1"^^)' (T^A2)3«^^-  (^^"^^-^ 

Example  4.     When  2  >  1,  deduce  Laplace's  second  integral  from  his  first  integral  by 
the  substitution 

{z-{z'-l)^cos6}{z  +  {z^-l)icos(f)}==l. 

Example  5.     By  expanding  in  powers  of  cos  (p,  shew  that   for  a   certain   range   of 
values  of  z, 

-     [''{5  +  (22_l)^C0S<i}"rf(A  =  S"i^(-i?i,  i-i%;  1;  1-2-2). 

TT     J  0  -  -         - 

Example  6.     Shew  that  Legendre's  equation  is  defined  by  the  scheme 
(      0  X         1        1 

pj     -|h    i+hi    0    M, 
[^  +  hi       -in     0       J 
where  2=i(|^  +  ^~^). 

15-231.     The  Mehler-Dirichlet  integral*  for  P„  (2). 

Another  expression  for  the  Legendre  function  as  a  definite  integral  may  be  obtained  in 
the  following  way : 

*  Dirichlet,  Crelle,  Bd.  xvii.  (1837),  p.  35;  Mehler,  Math.  Ann.  Bd.  v.  (1872),  p.  141. 


15-231]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  309 

For  all  values  of  n,  we  have  by  the  preceding  theorem 

F„  (3)  =  i   [ '' {2  +  cos  (^  (?2  -  l)i}"  rf</). 
In  this  integral,  replace  the  variable  (^  by  a  new  variable  A,  defined  by  the  equatitm 

and  we  get  '    P„(2)  =  -  f'^'^^''"^'  h^{l-2hz+k^)-idh; 

the  path  of  integration  is  a  straight  line,  argA  is  determined  by  the  fact  that  h  =  z  when 
<^=-in-,  and  (1 -2Az  +  A''^)  -  i= -1(22- 1)*  sin  (^. 

Now  let  a=cos  6 ;  then 

P„(cos^)=-  /         k'{\-2hz+h^)-^dh. 

■f  J    -id 
e 

Now  {0  being  restricted  so  that  —  ^tt  <  ^  <  I^tt  when  n  is  not  a  positive  integer)  the 
path  of  integration  may  be  deformed*  into  that  arc  of  the  circle  |A|  =  1  which  passes 
through  A=l, and  joins  the  points  A  =  e~**,  h  =  e^,  since  the  integrand  is  analytic  throughout 
the  region  between  this  arc  and  its  chord  t. 

Writing  h=e^'^  we  get 

1    re  e("  +  i)*> 

P„(cosd)  =  - -dci>, 

■^  J  ~e  (2  cos  (^-2  cos  ^)2 


and  so 


D     /  /IN        2      f  C0S(/l  +  l)<^  ,, 

P„(cos^)  =  -        ^ -^    ,#; 

^  J^  {2(cos(^-cos^)P 


it  is  easy  to  see  that  the  positive  value  of  the  square  root  is  to  be  taken. 

This  is  known  as  Mehler's  simplified  form  of  Dirichlet^s  integral.     The  result  is  valid  for 
all  values  of  n. 

Example  1.     Prove  that,  when  w  is  a  positive  integer, 

P„(cos^)  =  -  /     ^ -^    ^;l- 

^  •/«  {2(cos^-cos(^)p 

(Write  TT  -  ^  for  ^  and  ir  —  (p  for  (ft  in  the  result  just  obtained.) 
Example  2.     Prove  that 


If  A" 

P„(cos^)  =  -^. ^d/i, 

27^^j   (A2_2Acos^+l)^ 


the  integral  being  taken  along  a  closed  path  which  encircles  the  two  points  /i~e  '  ,  and 
a  suitable  meaning  being  assigned  to  the  radical. 

*  If  ^  be  complex  and  R  (cos  ^)  >  0  the  deformation  of  the  contour  presents  slightly  greater 
difficulties.     The  reader  will  easily  modify  the  analysis  given  to  cover  this  case. 

+  The  integrand  is  not  analytic  at  the  ends  of  tlie  arc  but  behaves  like  (/t-c*'^)"^  near 
them ;  but  if  the  region  be  indented  (§  G-23)  at  e***  and  the  radii  of  the  indentations  be  made  to 
tend  to  zero,  we  see  that  the  deformation  is  legitimate. 


310  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

Hence  (or  otherwise)  prove  that,  if  6  lie  between  Jtt  and  f  tt, 

P   /pn^m-^       2.4...2?^        ,  co.s(^g  +  (^)  ,         P        cos(n^  +  3«^)  > 
jr  d.5...(2%+l)         (2sin^)*        2(2n  +  3)      (2  sin  ^)^      | 
1  1^32  cos(«^  +  5(^)  I". 

2.4.(27i  +  3)(2»  +  5)      (2sin^)^      | 

where  0  denotes  |^  -  \ir. 

Shew  also  that  the  first  few  terms  of  the  series  give  an  approximate  value  of  P„  (cos  Q') 
for  all  values  of  6  between  0  and  tt  which  are  not  nearly  equal  to  either  0  or  tt.  And  explain 
how  this  theorem  may  be  used  to  approximate  to  the  roots  of  the  equation  P„  (cos  ^)  =  0. 

(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

15'3.     Legendre  functions  of  the  second  kind. 

We  have  hitherto  considered  only  one  solution  of  Legendre 's  equation^ 
namely  P>i(^).     We  proceed  to  find  a  second  solution. 

We  have  seen  (§  15 "2)  that  Legendre's  equation  is  satisfied  by 


I  {t^-iy(t-zy-'dt, 


taken  round  any  contour  such  that  the  integrand  returns  to  its  initial  value 
after  describing  it.  Let  i)  be  a  figure-of-eight  contour  formed  in  the  following 
way :  let  z  be  not  a  real  number  between  ±  1 ;  draw  an  ellipse  in  the  ^-plane 
with  the  points  +  1  as  foci,  the  ellipse  being  so  small  that  the  point  t  =  z  is 
outside.  Let  A  be  the  end  of  the  major  axis  of  the  ellipse  on  the  right 
of  « =  1. 

Let  the  contour  D  start  from  A  and  describe  the  circuits  (1  — ,  —  1  -i-),, 
returning  to  A  (cf.  §  12'43),  and  lying  wholly  inside  the  ellipse. 

Let  I arg z\^7r  and  let  ]  arg (z  —  t)\^  arg z  as  t-*0  on  the  contour.     Let 
arg(^  + l)  =  arg(i5— 1)  =  0  at  A. 

Then  a  solution  of  Legendre's  equation  valid  in  the  plane  (cut  along  the 
real  axis  from  1  to  —  x  )  is 

if  n  is  not  an  integer. 

When  R{n+  1)  >0,  we  may  deform  the  path  of  integration  as  in  §  12*43, 
and  get 

Qn(z)=^,l\i-tr(^-t)-^'-'dt 

(where  arg(l  —  ^)  =  arg(l -f-^)  =  0);  this  will  be  taken  as  the  definition  of 
Qn  (^)  when  71  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero.  When  n  is  a  negative  integer 
(=  — TO— 1)  Legendre's  differential  equation  for  functions  of  degree  n  is 
identical  with  that  for  functions  of  degree  in,  and  accordingly  we  shall  take 
the  two  fundamental  solutions  to  be  Pm  (z),  Qm  (z). 

Qn  {z)  is  called  the  Legendre  function  of  degree  n  of  the  second  kind. 


15'3,  15-31]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  311 

15*31.     Expansion  of  Qn  (z)  as  a  power-series. 

We  now  proceed  to  express  the  Legendre  function  of  the  second  kind  as 
a  power-series  in  z~^. 

We  have,  when  the  real  part  of  w  +  1  is  positive, 

Suppose  that  1 2;  |  >  1.     Then  the  integrand  can  be  expanded  in  a  series 
uniformly  convergent  with  regard  to  t,  so  that 

where  r  =  2s,  the  integrals  arising  from  odd  values  of  r  vanishing. 
Writing  t^  =  11,  we  get,  without  difficulty,  from  §  12*41, 

Qn  (^)  =  2^+1  rln+i)^^  F(^ln+l,ln+l;n  +  l;  ^-^)  . 

The  proof  given  above  applies  only  when  the  real  part  of  {71 +  1)  is  positive 
(see  §  4*5) ;  but  a  similar  process  can  be  applied  to  the  integral 

the  coefficients  being  evaluated  by  writing  I    (t^—  ly^t^ dt  in  the  form 

J  D 
/•(1-)  /•(-!  +  ) 

Jo  Jo 

and  then,  writing  t^  =  u  and  using  §  12*43,  the  same  result  is  reached,  so 
that  the  formula 

is  true  for  unrestricted  values  of  w  (negative  integer  values  excepted)  and  for 
all  values*  of  z,  such  that  \z\  >  1,  |  arg  z\<  tt. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer, 

«.(»=<^f ,^  I-:  f- D" /;  (»- 1)-- *■}  ■ 

*  When  n  is  a  positive  integer  it  is  unnecessary  to  restrict  the  value  of  arg  z. 


312  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

[It  is  easily  verified  that  Legeiidre's  equation  can  be  derived  from  the  equation 

d^v) 
by  diflferentiating  n  times  and  writing  w  =  -j-^  . 

Two  independent  sohitions  of  this  equation  are  found  to  be 

/•OO 

(22-1)™   and   (22-l)»  I      (v2_l)-"-irfj;. 
It  follows  that  ~  1(32 -\Y  i     ( y2 _  1 ) - ~ - 1  ^i.j 

is  a  solution  of  Legendre's  equation.  As  this  expression,  when  expanded  in  ascending 
powers  of  2~i,  commences  with  a  term  in  2~"~\  it  must  be  a  constant  multiple*  of  Qn  (z) ; 
and  on  comparing  the  coefficient  of  0~."~i  in  this  expression  with  the  coefficient  of  z~'^~^  in 
the  expansion  of  §„  {z),  as  found  above,  we  obtain  the  required  result.] 

Example  2.  Shew  that,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer,  the  Legendre  function  of  the 
second  kind  can  be  expressed  by  the  formula 

C  OO       r  ao       '"00  /"qo 

$„(0)  =  2»n!  j      j^    j^  ...j^_  (i;2-i)-«-i(f;^;)»  +  i. 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer, 

"       9"   ■»?  '  /* "" 

Q,{z)=   2         — -^(-2)-t  i;'C.2-l)-"-irf,. 

[This  result  can  be  obtained  by  applying  the  general  integration-theorem 

r  r  /,"  -  /,"  ^<"'  <*>■"'  -  ,L4f?9i.r  "-^f"'  ^' 

to  the  preceding  result.] 

15*32.      The  reciirrence-formulae  for  Qn{z)- 

The  functions  P„  (2)  and  Q^  {z)  have  been  defined  by  means  of  integrals  of  precisely  the 
same  form,  namely 

\  {fi-lY{t-zy-^dt, 
taken  round  different  contours. 

It  follows  that  the  general  proof  of  the  recurrence-formulae  for  Pn{z),  given  in  ^  15"21, 
is  equally  applicable  to  the  function  Qn  (z) ;  and  hence  that  the  Legendre  function  of  the 
second  kind  satisfies  the  recurrence-formulae 

{n  +  l)  Qn^,{z)~{^n  +  \)  zQn{z)  +  nQ,,_^{z)  =  0, 

^V.  + 1  (--)-<?'. -1  (2)  =  (2H-fl)(>„  (4 
{z'-\)Q'n{z)-^nzQ„{z)-nQ,_,{z). 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

and  deduce  that  ^2  (2)  =  ^-^''2  (•')  log  ^—-  -  |2, 

z  —  \ 

Q,iz)  =  lP,iz)\i>g'^-iz^+-^. 

*  P„  [z)  coni&ina  poititive  powers  of  2  when  n  is  an  integer. 


1532,  15-33]  LEGENDBE   FUNCTIONS  313 

Example  2.     Shew  by  the  recurrence-formulae  that,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer*, 

jP„(2)logJ-+-i-Q„(2)=/„_,(2), 

where  fn-i{z)  consists  of    the  positive   (and   zero)   powers  of   z  in   the   expansion   of 

2  +  1 
^P^  (z)  log  — —  in  descending  powers  of  z. 

[This  example  shews  the  nature  of  the  singularities  of  Qn  (z)  at  ±  1,  when  n  is  an  integer, 
which  make  the  cut  from  —  1  to  +1  necessary.  For  the  connexion  of  the  result  with 
the  theory  of  continued  fractions,  see  Gauss,  Werke,  iir.  pp.  165-206,  and  Frobenius, 
Crelle,  lxxiii.  p.  16.] 

15*33.     The  Laplacian  integral^  for  Legendre  functions  of  the  second  kind. 
It  will  now  be  proved  that,  when  i2  (?i  +  1)  >  0, 

Q„  {z)  =r  [z+  {z^  -  1)^  cosh  6'}-"-^  de, 
Jo 

where  arg  [z  +  (^■^  —  1  y  cosh  6]  has  its  principal  value  when  ^  =  0,  if  n  be  not 
an  integer. 

First  suppose  that  z  >\.     In  the  integral  of  §  15"3,  viz. 

^     e'{z+l)^-{z-lf 
write  t=         -        , — ^-       \, 

e%z  +  \Y  +  {z-l)^ 

so  that  the  range  (—1,  1)  of  real  values  of  t  corresponds  to  the  range  (—  oo  ,  oo  ) 
of  real  values  of  6.  It  then  follows  (as  in  §  15*23  A)  by  straightforward 
substitution  that 


/•oo 
Qn  {Z)  ^\\         [Z  +  (Z'  -  1)2  cosh  ^}-'»-i  de 

/•oo 

=       {^  -f  (0^  -  1  )*  cosh  6]-^-^  dO, 

Jo 


since  the  integrand  is  an  even  function  of  6. 

To  prove  the  result  for  values  of  z  not  comprised  in  the  range  of  real  values  greater 
than  1,  we  observe  that  the  branch  points  of  the  integrand,  qua  function  of  s,  are  at  the 

points  +1  and  at  points  where  z  +  {z^  —  l)^ conh  6  vanishes;  the  latter  are  the  points  at 
which  z=  ±tanh^. 

Hence  Q,,  (z)  and   /     {z  +  {z'^-  1)^  cosh  0}-"'-'^dd  are  both  analytic  J  at  all  points  of  the 
plane  when  cut  along  the  line  joining  the  points  z=  ±1. 

*  If  -  1  <  2  <  1,  it  is  apparent  from  these  formulae  that  Q^  (^  +  0()  -  Q„  (^  -  0/)  =  -  7r/P„  (:). 
It  is  convenient  to  define  Q^iz)  for  such  values  of   z  to  be  iQ„{z  +  Oi)  +  hQ,^(z-Oi).      The 
reader  will  observe  that  this  function  satisfies  Legendre's  equation  for  real  values  of  r. 
t  This  formula  was  first  given  by  Heine  ;    see  his  Kiigelfunktionen,  p.  147. 
X  It  is  easy  to  shew  that  the  integral  has  a  unique  derivate  in  the  cut  plane. 


314  '         THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

By  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation  the  equation  proved  for  positive  values  of  2  — 1 

persists  for  all  values  of  z  in  the  cut  plane,  provided  that  arg{2  +  (22  — 1)2  cosh  6\  is  given 
a  suitable  value,  namely  that  one  which  reduces  to  zero  when  2  —  T  is  positive. 

The  integrand  is  one-valued  in  the  cut  plane  [and  so  is  $„(2)]  when  n  is  a  positive 

integer;  but  arg  {2  + (2^  —  1)^  cosh  &\  increases  by  %ir  as  arg2  does  so,  and  therefore  if  %  be 
not  a  positive  integer,  a  further  cut  has  to  be  made  from  2=  —  1  to2=— oc. 

These  cuts  give  the  necessary  limitations  on  the  value  of  2 ;  and  the  cut  when  n  is  not 

an  integer  ensures  that  arg  {2 +  (22  —  1)2}  =2arg{(2  +  l)2  +  (2— l)2},has  its  principal  value. 

Example  1.  Obtain  this  result  for  complex  values  of  2  by  taking  the  path  of 
integration  to  be  a  certain  circular  arc  before  making  the  substitution 

^^6^2  +  1)^ -(2-1)^ 

where  6  is  real. 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  if  2  >  1  and  coth  a=z, 

Qn  (2)  =  f  "  {z  -  (22  - 1  )i  cosh  ^»  die, 
where  arg  {2 -  (2^ -  l)i  cosh  u]  =  0.  (Trinity,  1893.) 

15*34.     Neumamtis*  formula  for  $„  (2),  when  n  is  an  integer. 

When  n  is  a  positive  integer,  and  2  is  not  a  real  number  between  1  and  —  1,  the 
function  Qn{z)  is  expressed  in  terms  of  the  Legendre  function  of  the  first  kind  by  the 
relation 

which  we  shall  now  establish. 

When  1 2  j  >  1  we  can  expand  the  integrand  in  the  iniiformly  convergent  series 

Pniy)    2   ;^K 

ni=0  * 

Consequently 

^  J  -\  ^-y       ^  ni=0  J  -1 

The  integrals  for  which  m  — ?i  is  odd  or  negative  vanish  (§  15-211) ;  and  so 

■^  J  -I  ^~y       ^  m=0  J  -1 

1    *  ,      ,2»  +  ^(n  +  2m)\  (n  +  m)\ 

2,„=o  m\{2n  +  2m  +  l)l 

2"  (il  n2 

by  §  15'31.  The  theorem  is  thus  established  for  the  case  in  which  |  2]  >  1.  Since  each 
side  of  the  equation 

I'epresents  an  analytic  function,  even  when  |  2  |  is  not  greater  than  unity,  provided  that  2  is 
not  a  real  number  between  —1  and  +1,  it  follows  that,  with  this  exception,  the  result  is 
true  (§  5"5)  for  all  values  of  2. 

*  F.  Neumann,  Crelle,  Bd.  xxxvii.  p.  24. 


15'34,  15-4]  LEGENDBE   FUNCTIONS  315 

Example  1,    Shew  that,  when  -\^R{z)^\,  |  $„(a)|  ^[/(z)  |-i;  and  that  for  other 
values  of  z,  |§n(«)l  do^s  not  exceed  the  larger  of  |2-1|~',  |3+1|"^ 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer,  (?„  (2)  is  the  coefficient  of  A"  in 
the  expansion  of  (1  -  2hz + A'^)  ~  2  arc  cosh  J r  L  . 

1(22- l)ij 

[For,  when  |  A  |  is  sufficiently  small. 


=  (1  -  2hz  +  A2)  -  i  arc  cosh  |  A^'^   ] 


This  result  has  been  investigated  by  Heine,  Kugelfunktionen,  i.  p.  134,  and  Laurent, 
LiouvUle^s  Journal,  (3)  I.  p.  373.] 

15'4.     Helms*  development  of  {t  —  z)"^  as  a  series   of  Legendre  poly- 
nomials in  z. 

We   shall   now   obtain   an   expansion   which  will  serve  as  the  basis  of 
a  general  class  of  expansions  involving  Legendre  polynomials. 

The  reader  will  readily  prove  by  induction  from  the  recurrence-formulae 

(2m+  1)  tQ,,{t)-(m  +  1)  Q,n+^  (t)  -mQ,n-^  (0  =  0, 

{2m  + 1)  zPm  (z)  -  (m  +  1)  Pm+i  (z)  -  mPm-,  {z)  =  0, 
that 

I       Z       OT=o  f  —  ^ 

Using  Laplace's  integrals,  we  have 

Pn+A^)Qn(t)-Pn(^)Qn+dt) 


n    1"^      f 
1 


TTJo  Jo 


z  +  (z'-  1)^C0S<^}' 


Now  consider 


x[z  +  (z-  -  1)^  cos  (^  -  {t  +  (t-  -  1)-  cosh  u]-^]  d(J3du 

j  z  +  {z^-  1)2  cos<^  i 

\t  +  {f--  l)"*coshM 

Let  cosh  a,  cosh  a  be  the  scnii-major  axes  of  the  ellipses  with  foci  ±1  which  pass 
through  z  and  t  respectively.     Let  6  be  the  eccentric  angle  of  z ;  then 

s=cosh  {a  +  i6), 

\z±{z^-l)^cos(})\  =  \  cosh  (a  +  id) ± sinh  (a  +  id)  cos cji  | 

=  {cosh2  a  -  sin-  d  +  (cosh"^  a  -  cos- 6)  cos^  0  ±  4  sinh  a  cosh  a  cos  <^}2. 

This  is  a  maximum  for  real  Vcilues  of  0  when  eos(f)=  +  l;  and  hence 

]  s±  (s2  -  l)i  cos  4)\^%2  cosh2  a  -  1  +  2  cosh  a  (cosh-  a  -  l)i  =  exp  (2a). 

Similarly  \t  +  {t--Vy-i  cosh  ic  \  ^  exp  a. 

*  Crdle,  Bd.  xlii.  p.  72. 


316  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

Therefore 

P~^i  (z)  Qn  (0  -  Pn  (z)  Qn+i  (t)  \  $  ^"^  exp  {n(a  -  a)]  f   /     Vd<f>du, 


n+i ' 


where  I  ^|  =  !  —^-^^ 1 ~ 

t  +  {P-l)^coshu 

Therefore  |  Pn+i  (z)  Qn  (0  -  ^«  (^)  Qn+i  (t)\^0,  as  7i^  cc  ,  provided  a  <  a. 
And  further,  if  t  varies,  a  remaining  constant,  it  is  easy  to  see  that 

the  upper  bound  of  Vd(f)du  is  independent  of  t,  and  so 

Jo  Jo 

Pn+i{z)Qn(t)-Pn(z)Qn+Ut) 

tends  to  zero  uniformly  with  regard  to  t. 

Hence  if  the  point  z  is  in  the  interior  of  the  ellipse  which  passes  through 
the  point  t  and  has  the  points  ±  1  for  its  foci,  then  the  expansion 

J-=     2     {%l+l)Pn{z)Qn{t) 
t  —  Z         n=0 

is  valid ;  and  if  t  be  a  variable  point  on  an  ellipse  with  foci  ±  1  such  that  z  is 
a  fixed  point  inside  it,  the  expansion  converges  uniformly  ivith  regard  to  t. 

15 '41.  Neumann's*  expansion  of  an  arbitrary  function  in  a  series  of 
Legendre  polynomials. 

We  proceed  now  to  discuss  the  expansion  of  a  function  in  a  series  of 
Legendre  polynomials.  The  expansion  is  of  special  interest,  as  it  stands  next 
in  simplicity  to  Taylor's  series,  among  expansions  in  series  of  polynomials. 

Let  f{z)  be  any  function  which  is  analytic  inside  and  on  an  ellipse  C, 
whose  foci  are  the  points  e  =  ±  1.     We  shall  shew  that 

f{z)  =  ttoPo {z)  +a,P,  (z)  +  a,P^  (z)  +  a,P, {z)  +  ..., 

where  a^,  a^,  a^...  are  independent  of  z,  this  expansion  being  valid  for  all 
points  z  in  the  interior  of  the  ellipse  C. 

Let  t  be  any  point  on  the  circumference  of  the  ellipse. 

00 

Then,  since    S    (2n  +  1)  Pn{z)  Qn{t)  converges  uniformly  with  regard  to  t 

71=0 

/<^>  -  2S-  l/t"^  =  2S  J.  /.  (^"  ^  1)  ^»  (^>  «•■  <')/<*>  '"' 

00 

X    anPniz), 


n  =  0 


2n  +  1  f 
where  Un  =     ^    .    j    f{t)  Qn  (t)  dt. 

*  K.  Neumann,  Ueher  die  Enticickelung  einer  Funktion  nach  den  Kugelfunktionen  (Halle, 
1862).  See  also  Thome,  Crclle,  Bd.  lxvi.  p.  337.  Neumann  also  gives  an  expansion,  in  Legendre 
functions  of  both  kinds,  valid  in  the  annulus  bounded  by  two  ellipses. 


15-41,  15o]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  317 

This  is  the  required  expansion ;  since  S  (2n  + 1)  P„  (z)  Q^  (t)  may  be  proved* 

w  =  0 

to  converge  uniformly  with  regard  to  z  when  z  lies  in  any  domain  C  lying 
wholly  inside  G,  the  expansion  converges  uniformly  throughout  C. 

Another   form  for  a„  can  therefore   be  obtained  by  integrating,  as  in 
§  15-211,  so  that 

an  =  (n  +1)  j     /(^)  ^n  (a?)  dx- 

A  form  of  this  equation  which  is  frequently  useful  is 


""^I^J!/"'^^^^^-^^"'^'^"^^' 


which  is  obtained  by  substituting  for  P„  (w)  from  Rodrigues'  formula  and 
integrating  by  parts. 

When  f{x)  is  a  function  of  a  real  variable  x  in  the  range  ( - 1  ^  «  ^  1),  f(x)  can  he 
expanded  in  a  series  of  Legendre  polynomials  v«,lid  in  this  range  and  has  limited  total 
fluctuation  in  the  range  (-1,  1). 

This  theorem  bears  the  same  relation  to  Neumann's  expansion  as  Fourier's  theorem 
bears  to  the  expansion  of  §  9'11. 

For  a  proof  of  a  more  general  form  of  the  theorem,  the  reader  is  referred  to  memoirs 
by  Hobsont  and  BurkhardtJ. 

Example  1.  Shew  that,  if  p  (>  1)  be  the  radius  of  convergence  of  the  series  2c„z",  then 
2c„P„(2)  converges  inside  an  ellipse  whose  semiaxes  are  ^(/>  +  p"*),  i(p-p~^). 

Example  2.     If      z=(^),    k^=  \'^--]\^l±^    ^„heve  y  >  x>  1, 
provethat  [' ^=.{(^+i)(y- i)}i  i  P,{x)Q,{,j). 

[Substitute  Laplace's  integrals  on  the  right,  integrate  with  regard  to  (f)  and  then 
take  a  new  variable  t  defined  by  the  equation 

(y  +  l)^  +  (i/-l)*cosh(9 


(y-l)^  +  (?/  +  l)i  cosh^ 
Example  3.     Shew  that 


=  t.] 


15-5.     Ferrers   associated  Legendre  functions  P,i'"  {z)  and  Q,j"*  {z). 
We  shall  now  introduce  a  more  extended  class  of  Legendre  functions. 
If  m  be  a  positive  integer  and  -\  <z  <1,  n  being  unrestricted §,  the 
functions 

P, - (.)  =  (1  -  .^)i-  ^J^^"> ,     Q, -  (.)  =  (1  - .•^)*-  ^'"^^^ 

*  The  proof  is  similar  to  the  proof  in  §  15'4  that  that  convergence  is  uniform  with  regard 
to   t. 

t  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  vi.  (1908),  pp.  388-395;  Vol.  vii.  (1909),  pp.  24-39. 

:;;  Munchcn.  Sitzungsbericltte,  Bd.  xxxix.  (1909),  No.  10. 

g  See  p.  311,  footnote.     Ferrers  writes  T„"'(z)  for  F,^"^{z).  , 


318  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

will  be  called  Ferrers'  associated  Legendre  functions  of  degree  n  and  order  m 
of  the  first  and  second  kinds  respectively. 

It   may  be   shewn   that  these   functions   satisfy  a  differential   equation 
analogous  to  Legendre 's  equation. 

For,  differentiate  Legendre's  equation 

m  times  and  write  v  for  -r-^ .     We  obtain  the  equation 

{l-z^)-r-^-22(7n  +  l)^ +{n-m){7i  +  m  +  l)v  =  0. 
Write  w  =  {1  —  0^)^"'  v,  and  we  get 

This  is  the  differential  equation  satisfied  by  P^^  (z)  and  Qn^  (z). 

From  the  definitions  given  above,  several  expressions   for  the  associated   Legendre 
functions  may  be  obtained. 

Thus,  from  Schlafli's  formula  we  have 

where  the  contour  does  not  enclose  the  point  ^=  —  1. 

Further,  when  n  is  a  positive  integer,  we  have,  by  Rodrigues'  formula, 

p  m  (,\  _  \ i ^ i_ 

Example.     Shew  that  Legendre's  associated  equation  is  defined  by  the  scheme 
r       0         00  1  \ 

p}.      ^m    n  +  1         ^m     ^-^zi.  (Olbricht.) 

\  —\m      —n      —^m  J 

15"51.     The  integral  properties  of  the  associated  Legendre  functions. 
The  generalisation  of  the  theorem  of  §  15*14  is  the  following: 
When  n,  r,  m  are  positive  integers  and  n  >  in,  r  >  m,  then 

[     Fn'""  {z)  Pr  (z)  dz=0  (r  :jfe  n)  ] 

2      (71  +  m) ! 


2n  +  l  {n  —  m.y. 


(r  =  n)  I 


To  obtain   the  first  result,  multiply  the  differential  equations   for  P,/"'  (z), 
P/" (z)  by  Pr^ (z),  P,i'^  (z)  respectively  and  subtract ;  this  gives 

+  {n  -r)(n  +  r  +  l)  P,'"  (z)  P,,»"  (z)  =  0. 


15-51,  15'6]  LEOENDRE   FUNCTIONS  319 

On  integrating  between  the  limits  —  1, +1,  the  result  follows  when  n 
and  r  are  unequal,  since  the  expression  in  square  brackets  vanishes  at  each 
limit.  "^ 

To  obtain  the  second  result,  we  observe  that 

,  fjp  m{g\  . 

Pn"*+'  (Z)  =  (1  -  Z')i  ^Y^  +  WIZ  (1  -  Z^)  -  4  PrT  {z)  \ 

squaring  and  integrating,  we  get 

+  ^lAPn^\z)Y]dz 
=  -J[^Prr(z)  ^  j(l-^^)^-^«^>|ci.-mJ'^  {Pn"^(z)Ydz 

+  j_^^^APn^{z)}^dz, 

on  integrating  the  first  two  terms  in  the  first  line  on  the  right  by  parts. 
If  now  we  use  the  differential  equation  for  P^^{z)  to  simplify  the  first 
integral  in  the  second  line,  we  at  once  get 

[     {P«"*+i  {z)Y  dz  =  (n-m){n  +  m  +  l)j      {P^^  {z)Y  dz. 
By  repeated  applications  of  this  result  we  get 


/ 


1 

{P„''*(z)}2  dz  =  {n-m  +  l){n-m+2)...7i 


x(n  +  m){n  +  m-l)...{n-\-  1)1      {Pn{z)Ydz, 

and  so  f  {P,r(z)Ydz=^^  ^:^'^. 

15'6.     Hohson's  definition  of  the  associated  Legendre  functions. 

So  far  it  has  been  taken  for  granted  that  the  function  (1  —  z'^)^'^  which 
occurs  in  Ferrers'  definition  of  the  associated  functions  is  purely  real ;  and 
since,  in  the  more  elementary  physical  applications  of  Legendre  functions,  it 
usually  happens  that  —  1  <  2;  <  1,  no  complications  arise.  But  as  we  wish 
to  consider  the  associated  functions  as  functions  of  a  complex  variable,  it  is 
undesirable  to  introduce  an  additional  cut  in  the  ^-plane  by  giving  arg  (1  —  2^) 
its  principal  value. 

Accordingly,  in  future,  ivhen  z  is  not  a  real  number  such  that  —  1  <  z  <  1, 
we  shall  follow  Hobson  in  defining  the  associated  functions  by  the  equations 

p-  (z) = {z^  - 1)4-  ^";^/"> ,  Q, - (.)  ^  (z^  -  i)i-  ^"2:i"^ , 

where  m  is  a  positive  integer,  71  is  unrestricted  and  arg  z,  arg  (z  +  1),  arg  (2—  I) 
have  their  principal  values. 


320  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

When  7)1  is  unrestricted,  Pn"*  (z)  is  defined  by  Hobson  to  be 

and  Barnes  has  given  a  definition  of  $„'"  {z)  from  which  the  formula 
_sin(?2H-m)n- r(%  +  m  +  l)r(^)  {f-\)^'^ 


^»'"(2)  =  - 


may  be  obtained. 

Throughout  this  work  we  shall  take  m  to  be  a  positive  integer. 

15'61.     Expression  of  Pn^  {z)  as  an  integral  of  Laplace's  type. 

If  we  make  the  necessary  modification  in  the  Schlafli  integral  of  §  15"5, 
in  accordance  with  the  definition  of  1 15"6,  we  have 

P, » (,)  =  (»»  +  l)(« +^2).. ■(»  +  «!) (,, _  i)4,„  J^-'  '+>(,,  _!)„(,_  ,^_,._.._,  ^, 

Write  t  =  z  +  {z'-  1)^6'*,  as  in  §  15-23 ;  then 

P  m  /,x  _  (ri+l)(n+2)...(7i  +  7n)  j,„  pT+a  |^  +  (^2_i)lcos<^p^ 

^^    ^^^~  2^r  ~^'-^^      j.  |(,._i)V*}-       "^^^ 

where  a  is  the  value  of  ^  when  Hs  at  J.,  so  that 

I  arg  {z^  —  1)^  +  a  I  <  TT. 

Now,  as  in  §  15*23,  the  integrand  is  a  one- valued  periodic  function  of  the 
real  variable  <p  with  period  27r,  and  so 

Since  [z  +  iz^  —  l)2cos0}'*  is  an  even  function  of  ^,  we  get,  on  dividing 
the  range  of  integration  into  the  parts  (—  tt,  0)  and  (0,  tt), 

p_  .„^^^  ^  (..  +  !)(«  + 2)...  (,.  +  m)  r  j^  ^  ^^,  _  j^j  _^^^  ^  „  ^^^        ^^ 

The  ranges  of  validity  of  this  formula,  which  is  due  to  Heine,  (according  as 
n  is  or  is  not  an  integer)  are  precisely  those  of  the  formula  of  §  15'23. 

Example.     Shew  that,  if  |  arg 2  |  <  Jtt, 

p^  m  (;;)  _  /     Nm  '<^  {n-\)...(n-m->r\)   f^  cos  mcjidcf) 

^  ^0     {2+(s''^-l)*COS0}"  +  l' 

where  the  many-valued  functions  are  specified  as  in  §  15-23. 

15*7.     The  addition  theorem  for  the  Legendre  polynomials*. 

Let  z=xx'  —  {x'^—\y^  {x"^  —  1)^  cos  co,  where  x,  x\  a  are  unrestricted  complex  numbers. 

*  Legendre,  Calc.  Int.  t.  ii.  pp.  262-2G9.    An  investigation  of  the  theorem  based  ou  physical 
reasoning  will  be  given  subsequently  (§  18-4). 


LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS 


15-61,  15-7] 

Then  we  shall  shew  that 

x  +  ^x^ - 1)^  cos  {<>>-<f>) 


321 


First  let  R  (a')  >  0,  so  that 


is  a  bounded  function  of  (f>  in  the 


range  0  <  0  <  27r.     If  31  be  its  upper  bound  and  if  |  A  |  <  M~^,  then 

«    ^J^  +  (:g--i-l)^C0s(a>-(^)}" 
«="  {a-'  +  (:p'2-1)^C08<^}"  +  i 

converges  uniformly  with  regard  to  cf),  and  so  (§  4'7) 

*         /■  T    {^+(^2_i)i  cos  (« -  <;())}»  , .  _  r "      5  A™J^(^2 -  iji cos  (co  - (^)}» 

n=0         j  -T     {^  +  (,r'2-l)ic0S^}''  +  l  j  -1)1=0       {ji;'  +  (;(7'2-l)i  cos  (/)}"  +  ! 


/: 


rf(^ 


-:r  ^'  +  (.??'^-  1)^  COS  (jy-h  {x  +  {x^-  1)^  cos  (w  -  <^)} 
Now,  by  a  slight  modification  of  example  1  of  §  6  "21,  it  follows  that 

dcf) 27r 


/: 


A  +  Bcoscfy  +  Csincl)     (A^-B^-C^)^' 
where  that  value  of  the  radical  is  taken  which  makes 

\A-{A^- 2?2 _ (;2)i I  <  I  (^2  +  (72)^ I , 


Therefore 


/ 


d(f) 


-n  ^  +  (^'2-l)icos(^-A{.r  +  (.r2-l)4cos(a)-<^)} 

2rr 


[(X'  -  hxf  -  {(^'2  _  1  )4  _  /j  (^2  _  1  )i  COS  ^}2  _  |/i  (^2  _  1  )4  gin  a>ff 

2tt 


(1-2A2+A2)i' 

and  when  /i-».0,  this  expression  has  to  tend  to  27rPo  C'^')  by  §  15-23.     Expanding  in  powers 
of  h  and  equating  coefficients,  we  get 


Pn{^  =  l 


{x  +  {x"-  -  l)i  cos  (q)  -  0)}» 


d4>. 


2  "■   ./    _  ^     {.f'  +  (a,-'2  -  1  )4  cos  (^}™  +  1 

Now  P„  (s)  is  a  polynomial  of  degree  n  in  cos  w,  and  can  consequently  be  expressed  in 

n 

the  form  ^^o+  2  J,„cosOTa),  where  the  coefficients  Jq?  -^i  ■■■  -Ui  ai"e  indei)endent  of  w; 
»i=i 

to  determine  them,  we  use  Fourier's  rule  (§  9'12),  and  we  get 
1 


Am  — 


1 

9^ 


Pn  (2)  COS  w^a)  dco 

^     {x  4-  (,i;2  -  1  )^  cos  (w  —  c^)}"  COS  wiw 

l''2 


2-  1)- COS  (w  — d))}"C0SHia)    ,,1    , 

^ -T — ^-^ dcf)    dco 

;'  +  (.x''2-l)4cos0}»-'i  J 

1       fn     r   /"t      {.*;  +  (.*-2- 1)2  cos  (co  -<i)}"COS  J?la)    ,    1    ,  , 
^-^,  I         ! !^ J — dco  \d(fi 

^■^     J    -n\_j    -n  {^'  +  (x'2-l)icOS(^}"+l  J 

1      [■^    \  i"^    {a'  +  (^^— 1)^  cos\//'}"cosm  (0  +  a//-) 

27^-  J  -TT   L  j       '^  (.,/  +  (.t;'2  _  1)1  COS  0;»  -  1  '       - 


c/0, 


on  changing  the  order  of  integration,  writing  co  =  (^  +  \/^  and  changing  the  limits  for  y\f 
from  +  TT  —  0  to  ±  TT. 

w.  M.  A.  21 


322  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.   XV 

Now   I       {^  + (072-1)2  cos !!/■}" sin  m^//c?^//•  =  0,  since  the  integrand  is  an  odd  function; 

and  so,  by  i:^  15"61, 

n\  [-^  cos  m(p .  Pji'"  (x)         , 

TT  (%  +  m)  !  7  _^  |_^.' +  (^2  _  1)4  COS  <^}»  +  1 

Therefore,  when  |  arg  z'  |  <  ^tt, 

n  f'Y)  —  qi-)\  t 

P^{z)=.P,,{x)P,{x')  +  2   2    (-)™^V-^P„-(^)P,-(.r')cosm«. 

m=I  (^/(.-(-//Ij  . 

But  this  is  a  mere  algebraical  identity  in  x,  x'  and  cos  u>  (since  w  is  a  positive  integer) 
and  so  is  true  independently  of  the  sign  of  R  [x'). 
The  result  stated  has  therefore  been  proved. 
The  corresponding  theoi-em  with  Ferrers'  definition  is 

P„  {xx'  +  ( 1  _  .r2)4  ( 1  -  .r'2)2  cos  a,}  =  P„  {x)  P„  {x')  +  22   ^ 3-^^  ^n"^ .(*■)  /^J"  (-r')  cos  mco. 

m=i  {n  +  inj . 

15*71.     The  addition  theorem  for  the  Legendre  functions. 

Let  X,  x'  be  two  constants,  real  or  complex,  whose  arguments  are  numerically  less  than 
\if ;   and   let   {x±l)^^  (-^'±1)^  be  given  their  principal  values;    let   u)  be  real  and  let 

Z  =  xx  —  (^2  —  1 )  2  (^ 2  _  1  )2  cos  O).  • 

Then  toe  shall  shew  that,  if  j  argi  |  <  Itr  for  all  vahies  of  the  real  variable  ta,  and  n  he 
not  a  positive  integer, 

P,,{z)=P,„{x)P,{x')  +  2     2     (  -  )'»  ^  L    ,   „:  1 1     1^:"'  (^)  Pn'  (^')  ^O^  »^"- 

)H  =  i  J^  (^71 -t-  /M -f-  i ; 

Let  cosh  a,  cosh  a  be  the  semi-major  axes  of  the  ellipses  with  foci  ±1  passing  through 
.r,  x'  respectively.     Let  ^,  ^'  be  the  eccentric  angles  of  x,  x'  on  these  ellipses  so  that 

-Itt  </3<  .^TT,      -\n  <fi'  <hn. 

Let  a  +  i0  =  I,  a'  +  2/3'  =  $',  so  that  ,r  =  cosh  |,  :r'  =  cosh  |'. 

Now  as  CO  passes  through  all  real  values,  R  (z)  oscillates  between 

R  {xx')  ±  R  (,f2  -  1  )i  (.*-'2  -  1 )  i  =  cosh  (a  ±  a')  COS  (3  ±  fi'), 

so  that  ?Y  is  necessary/  that  13  +  13'  he  acute  angles  positive  or  negative. 

Now  take  Schlafli's  integral 

and  write 

_ e"^  {e"'"'^  sinh  g  cosh  -^-f  -  cotsh  g  sinh  1  g'j  +  cosh  ^  cosh  Af  - e''"  sinh  g  sinh  jg' 

cosh  If +  e^*sinhig' 

The  path  of  t,  as  <^  increases  from  —  tt  to  tt,  may  l)e  shewn  to  be  a  circle;  and  the 
reader  will  verify  that 

_  ^  _  2je^^*2!i^^shJ|-i- sinh  \^)  {sinh  i^  cosh  ||'  -  e''"  cosh  1  g  sinh  ^f  | 
cosh  If +  </*  sinh  ig' 
■).  U  ("^  - '-)  sinh  |g  +  cosh  ig]  {cosh  |^  cosh  \^  -  e'"'  sinh  h^  sinh  if  J 


i  +  1^ 


C(wh|f  +  /*sinhif 
{e'*  cosh  Jf  +  sinh  ;}f }  {e'"  sinh  g  sinh-  h^'  +  e  " '"  sinh  g  cosh-  |-f  -  cosh  g  sinh  f } 
cosh  if  +  t''*  sinh  ^f 


15-71,  158]  LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  323 

Since*  |  cosh  J^'  |  >  |  siuh  ^^'  |,  the  argument  of  the  denominators  does  not  change  when 
<f)  increases  by  27r ;  for  similar  reasons,  the  arguments  of  the  first  and  third  numerators 
increase  by  27r,  and  the  argument  of  the  second  does  not  change;  therefore  the  circle 
contains  the  points  t=l,  t=z,  and  not  ^=—1,  so  it  is  a  possible  contour. 

Making  these  substitutions  it  is  readily  found  that 


P,,{z)  =  —  f"    {^'  +  (^^-l)^cos(<o-<^)}" 


d(f), 


and  the  rest  of  the  work  follows  the  course  of  §  15--7  except  that  the  general  form  of 
Fourier's  theorem  has  to  be  employed. 

Example.     Shew  that,  if  n  be  a  positive  integer, 

Qn  {XX'  +  (^2  _  1  )i  (^2  _  1  )i  cos  O)}  =  $„  {x)  P„  {x')  +  22    ^^^  {x)  1\  " '"  {x')  COS  ?««, 

TO  =  1 

when  o)  is  real,  R{x')  ^0,  and  \{x'  —  \)  {x  ■\-\)\  <\{x  —\)  {od  ->r\)\. 

(Heine,  Kugelfunktionen  ;  K.  Neumann,  Leipzig.  Ahh.  1886.) 

15-8.     The  functioni  C^  {z). 

A  function  connected  with  the  associated  Legendre  function  P„™  {z)  is  the  function 
€n  (z),  which  for  integral  values  of  7i  is  defined  to  be  the  coeflBcient  of  A"  in  the  expansion 
of  (1  -2hz  +  h'^)~''  in  ascending  powers  of  h.  , 

It  is  easily  seen  that  Cn  {z)  satisfies  the  differential  equation 

^      (2v+^  di  _  n{n  +  2v) 
dz'^    z'-l     dz         z'-l   ~^~^- 

For  all  values  of  n  and  v,  it  may  be  shewn  that  we  can  define  a  function,  satisfying 
this  equation,  by  a  contour  integral  of  the  form 


^^       ')  jp        («-2)»+l        '^^' 


where  C  is  the  contour  of  §  15-2  ;  this  corresponds  to  Schlafii's  integral. 
The  reader  will  easily  prove  the  following  results : 

(I)  When  n  is  an  integer 

Clz)-  {-2rv{u  +  l)...{u  +  n-l)  _      I  _  ,  d-  n  +  v  -  h  . 

^''  ^^'^7ili2n  +  2v-l){27i  +  2v-2)...{n  +  2p)^^     ''         dz^^^^       ">  '*' 

since  P^  (2)  =  C,r  (2),  Rodrigues'  formula  is  a  particular  case  of  this  result. 

(II)  When  r  is  an  integer, 

^n-r  (^)  =  (2r~iy"(27-  ^X^.ZT\  dz' ^''  ^^^' 

The  last  equation  gives  the  counexiun  between  the  functions  C„"(i)  and  P,,'  {z). 

""  This  follows  from  the  fact  that  cos  /3'  >  0. 

t  This  function  has  been  studied  by  Gegenbauer,    Wicn.  Sitzuiujbberichtc,  13de.   lxx,  lxxv, 
xcvii,  cii. 

21—2 


324  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

(III)     Modifications  of  the  recurrence-formulae  for  Py^  (z)  are  the  following : 

dCr,"  (2)  _  o„/f +1  M 

nC:'{z)  =  in-\  +  2v)zCl_^{z)-2v{\-z'^)C]-\{^). 


REFERENCES. 

A.  M.  Legendre,  Calcul  Integral^  t.  11. 

H.  E.  Heine*    Handbuch  der  Kugdfunktionen  (Berlin,  1878). 

N.  M.  Ferrers,  Spherical  Harmonics  (1877). 

I.  Todhunter,  Functions  of  Laplace,  Lame  and  Bessel  (1875). 

L.  ScHLAFLi,   Ueber  die  zwei  ■Heine' schen  Kugelfunktionen  (Bern,  1881). 

E.  AV.  HoBSON,  Phil.   Trans,  of  the  Royal  Society,  Vol.  187  a,  pp.  443-531. 

E.  W.  Barnes,  Quarterly  Journal,  Vol.  xxxix.  pp.  97-204. 

R.  Olbricht,  Studien  ueber  die  Kugel-  und  Cylinder -funktionen  (Halle,  1887). 

Miscellaneous  Examples!. 

1.  Prove  that  when  n  is  a  positive  integer, 

(Math.  Trip.  1898.) 

/"I  dP    dP 

2.  Prove  tlmt  zil-z^^^^dz 

J  —I  az     ctz 

is  zero  unless  m  —  n=  ±1,  and  determine  its  value  in  these  eases. 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 

3.  Shew  (by  induction  or  otherwise)  that  when  n  is  a  positive  integer,  • 

(2h  +  1)    I'  Pa'  (S)  dz=l-zP,;^-2z  (PjHp.,2+  ...  +  p2^_j)  +  2  {P,P.,  +  P.,Ps  +  ...  +  P,,_iP,,). 

(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 

4.  Show  that 

zP,:  {z)  =  nP,  (z)  +  (2h  -  3)  P„ _ ,  (.-)  +  (2/i  -  7)  P, -,{z)  +  .... 

(Clare,  1906.) 

5.  Shew  that 

z^  P,:'  (z)  =  n  {n  - 1 )  P„  (z)  +  2  (2/.  -  4/-  +  1 )  {r  (2/i  -  2/-  +  1 )  -  2}  P,,  _  2,-  {^), 

r=l 

where  p  =  In  or  I  (n  -  1).  (Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

*  Before  studying  the  Legendre  function  P„(2)  in  this  treatise,  the  reader  should  consult 
Hobson's  memoir,  as  some  of  Heine's  work  is  incorrect. 

t  The  functions  involved  in  examples  1-30  are  Legendre  'polynomials. 


LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS  325 

6.  Shew  that  the  Legendre  polynomial  satisfies  the  relation 

(a2-l)!i"^'  =  n(«-l)(w  +  l)(H  +  2)  /    dz  I    Pn{z)dz. 

(Trin.  Coll.  Dublin.) 

7.  Shew  that 


/ 


0  ^  ^-»  (')  ^"->  ^'^  ^^=  (27.-1)  (2^  +  1)  (2.^  +  3) • 

(Peterhou.se,  1905.) 


8.  Shew  that  the  values  of  I     (1  —z^yPm" (z)  Pn  i^) dz  are  as  follows : 

(i)    8n  (n  + 1)  when  m  —  n'vi  positive  and  even, 

(ii)  — 2w  (Ti^  — 1)  (7i_2)/(2?i+l)  when  ?H  =  n, 

(iii)  0  for  other  values  of  m  and  n.  (Peterhouse,  1907.) 

9.  Shew  that 

iihV'dP,„(sme)=   2    (-)'"-7-; — ^^^  cos'"  ^P^  (cos  ^). 
r=o  ^!  (n  —  r) !  r\         / 

(Math.  Trip.  1907.) 

10.  Shew,  by  evaluating  I     P^  (cos  ^)  dd  (§  15-1  example  2),  and  then  integrating  by 

r 
parts,  that   I      P„  (/x)  arc  sin  fi .  dfj,  is  zero  when  n  is  even  and  is  equal  to  n-  j^  '/■'"/ 1  \f 

when  %  is  odd.  (Clare,  1903.) 

11.  If  m  and  n  be  positive  integers,  and  m^n,  shew  by  induction  that 

P     (Z)P    (Z)-     S    An-r^yAn-r  f27l  +  2m  -  4r+l\ 

1.3.5...(2to-1) 

where  -^«i= ; • 

7n ! 

(Adams,  Proc.  Royal  Soc.  xxvfi.) 

12.  By  expanding  in  ascending  powers  of  ?i  shew  that 

(  —  V  r/"  1 

where  m^  is  to  be  replaced  by  (1  -z-)  after  the  differentiation  has  been  performed. 

13.  Shew  that  P„  (s)  can  be  expressed  as  a  constant  multiple  of  a  determinant  in 
which  all  elements  parallel  to  the  auxiliary  diagonal  are  equal  (i.e.  all  elements  are  equal 
for  which  the  sum  of  the  row-index  and  column-index  is  the  same) ;  the  determinant 
containing  n  rows,  and  its  elements  being 

_1       1         _1       1  1 

^'    ~3'    3^'      5'    5''' -a^T^^- 

(Heun,  Gott.  Nach.  1881.) 

14.  Shew  that,  if  the  path  of  integration  passes  above  <=1, 


„,,      2     r  {z{\-f-)-2t(\-z'^fY  ,  ,.,.,      , 


15.     By  writing  cot  ^'  =  cot  6  —  h  cosec  6  and  expanding  sin  Q'  in  powers  of  h  by  Taylor's 
theorem,  shew  that 

P„  (cos^)  =  ^  cosec"  +  i  ^  t'r^-^}  ■       (^lath.  Trip.  1893.) 
«1  rt(cot^)"  "■ 


326  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

16.  By  considering  2  A"  P,i  (2),  shew  that 

«  !  \/7r  J  -00  V      dzj 

17.  The  equation  of  a  nearly  spherical  surface  of  revolution  is 

r  =  1  +  a  {Pi  (cos  6)  +  P3  (cos  d)  +  ...  +  P2n-i  (cos d)}, 
where  a  is  small ;  shew  that  if  a^  be  neglected  the  radius  of  curvature  of  the  meridian  is 

n-l 
1  +  a   2   {%(4?rt  +  3)-(m  +  l)(8m-|-3)}  P2»j  +  i(cos^). 

TO  =  0 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

18.  The  equation  of  a  nearly  spherical  surface  of  revolution  is 

r = a  {1  +  fPn  (cos  6)}, 
where  e  is  small. 

Shew  that  if  e^  be  neglected,  its  area  is 

ina^  |l  +i.2  '-'^t^l .  (Trinity,  1894.) 

19.  Shew  that,  if  k  is  an  integer  and 

(\-2kz  +  h^)-^^=    2   a„P^(z), 


A»_   2^(^-3)  (2M  +  1)  (,^,l^l\^^^-^^^^,-U2n-k  +  i)    i(2n  +  k-2) 


then 

««  =  (T^A2p2  1.3.  5. ..'(>(;- 2)   V'^  dx^dy)  ^  ^'     '  " ''^' 

where  x  and  y  are  to  be  replaced  by  unity  after  the  difterentiations  have  been  performed, 

(Routh,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxvi.) 

20.  Shew  that 

j[^~~{Pn{:v)P,,_^iz)-P,,_,{x)P,,i^)}dx=-^^, 

J,2,^l  l[^"(^)  G^"-(^)  +  nil^"-(^))]=-l-      (Catalan.) 

21.  Let  A'2  +  ?/^  +  2-  =  /2,  z  =  fxr,  the  numbers  involved  being  real,  so  that  —  1  </i<  1. 
Shew  that 

(-)"r»^i  8"   /1\ 

where  r  is  to  be  treated  as  a  function  of  the  independent  variables  .v,  1/,  z  in  performing 
the  difterentiations. 

22.  With  the  notation  of  the  preceding  example  (cf  p.  313,  footnote  *),  shew  that 
(,.  +  1)P„(m)  +  M^,/(m)  = 


7i !        Si"  V'"'' 
23.     Shew  that,  if  j  A  |  and  ]  z  \  are  sufficiently  small, 

-^-^-,  =    2    (27i+  \)h"P,  (z). 
(l-2/iz  +  h^)'^       "=« 


LEGENDRE   FUNCTIONS 


327 


24.    Prove  that 


Pn.x{z)Qn.x{z)-P.-X  {z)  Qn.X  i')  =  ^^^^Y)'- 


(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

25.  If  the  arbitrary  function /(.r)  can  be  expanded  in  the  series 

f{x)=   2  a„P„(^), 

converging  uniformly  in  a  domain  which  includes  the  point  x=\,  shew  that  the  expansion 
of  the  integral  of  this  function  is 

/;/Wofc=-«.-^<.,+ J_  G:"f\-  |^)i'.W.  (Bauer.) 

26.  Determine  the  coefficients  in  Neumann's  expansion  of  e"^  in  a  series  of  Legendre 
polynomiala  (Bauer.) 


27.     Deduce  from  example  25  that 

77-/1.3.  5. ..(2/1- 1)^2 


arc  sm  2  =  -  2  , 

2  0  (     2. 4. 6. ..2/1 


{P2.^l{z)-P2n-l{z)]. 


(Catalan.) 


28.     Shew  that 


Qn  {Z)  =  \  log  (J^)  .  P„  (.)  -   |P„_,  (3)  Po  (^)  +  \  Pn-2(Z)  A  C^) 

+  lPn-3iz)P2{z)  +  ...+lPoiz)Pn-Az)\- 

(Schlafli,  Hermite.) 


29.     Shew  that 


«"<^)=2^|J.f-'-')"'»8;-^}-l^"WH':4{ 


Prove  also  that 


Qniz)  =  lPAz)log'--^-f.,,,{z), 


u        *           j:        /  \     2/1  - 1  „        ,  ^        2/t  -  5     „        /  V        2%  -  9     „        ,  X 
where*  f,i-i(z)  = F,,    ^  (z) -\ P„    ■t(z)+     P„    .-, (s)  +  ,.. 

,  -  J,..,(,.  ^  1)  '11-1^:1)  (irl)  ^  (,.  _  I  _  I)  "  (..- 1)  (..y)  (;i±j)  (eri)- 

^/.       .       1      rwi(n-l)(vi-2)(»  +  l)(7i  +  2)(«  +  3)  /2-l\3^        I' 
(  +(^^'.-1-2-3;  122232  (^-^j   +-^ 

where  >{-„=l+^  +  ^  +  ...+-.  (Math.  Trip.  1898.) 

30.     Shew  that  the  complete  solution  of  Legendre's  difterential  equation  is 

dt 


y  =  APn{z)  +  BP,.{z) 


(?^-l){/^„(OP' 


the  path  of  integration  being  the  straight  lino  which  when  produced  backwards  pas.se.s 
through  the  point  ^  =  0. 


The  tirst  of  these  expressions  for  f^-x  {^)  was  given  by  Christoffel,  Grelle,  lv. 


328  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS 

31.     Shew  that  {2  +  (22- l)i}«=    i  5,„fen-a-i  (s), 

?n=0 

where  B  a{a-^m  +  ^)  T{m-\)T{m-a-\) 

™  2iT  m\T{m-a+l) 


[chap.  XV 


(Schliifli. 


A-»-i 


32.     Shew  that,  when  R{n  +  l)>0, 

J  Z+{Z^-])^  (l-2/«2  +  A2)5 


and 


Qn(z)  =  j'^' 


■(z'-l)^ 


A" 


<^/i, 


c^A. 


33.     Shew  that 


(l-2A2  +  /j2)i 

cosh  ?»?< 


r(?i-m  +  l)7o   {s  +  (52_i)icoshtt}"+i 


c??^, 


where  the  real  part  of  (n  +  l)  is  greater  than  m. 


(Hobson.) 


34.     Obtain  the  expansion  of  P„  (z)  when  |  arg  3 1  <  tt  as  a  series  of  powers  of  l/z,  when 
n  is  not  an  integer,  namely 

Fu{z)  =  ~~'^{QAz)-Q-n-l{z)} 
TV 

2"J>^jJ)_  /l-_9i        _'_i       i_^      1 


+     r(-?or(i)"' 


[This  is  most  easily  obtained  by  the  method  of  §  14-51.] 


2   '  ^'       2     '   '^■*"'^"'   02 


35.     Shew  that  the  differential  equation  for  the  associated  Legendre  function  P,/"  {z) 
is  defined  by  the  schemes* 


0  00 


0 


X         1 


P\     -in        on        -hi       —^ \[,       p\     -hi         hn       0     -~ 

\;\«  +  i      -m     h'^  +  l  )  \hi  +  l      -hn     J 

(Olbricht.) 

36.  Shew  that  the  differential  equation  for  (7/  (z)  is  defined  by  the  scheme 

f  -■'     "      '      1 

P-l  h-v     7i  +  2v     i-p     z  y 

[     0  -n  0  J 

37.  Prove  that,  if 

^        (27^+ 1)  {2n  +  3U.  (2n  +  2s-l)  _       d>P, 

^''    ni^n^-\){^n^-\)  ...{n^-{s-\f}{n  +  sy^        '     dz'  ' 

u  n  2(2«  +  l)  2n  +  3  „ 

then  ^.  =  P,.,-    2„rr  ^"  +  2-]rrT^^-2, 

_3(2n  +  3)  3(2n  +  5)  (27^  +  3)  (2»  + 5) 

"  +  3        2h-1     '»->^     2;i-3        '"'      (2n-l)(2n-3)     "-''' 


and  find  the  [general  formula. 


(Math.  Trip.  189G.) 


See  also  §  1.5-5  example. 


LEGENDBE   FUNCTIONS  329 

38.  Shew  that 

p^m  (cos  6)  =  —  ^(^  +  "^+^)  r<iO^{{n+\)e-^n  +  lmn}  ^   V'  -  4m^  C08{(7^  +  §)^-J7r  +  |m7r} 

^ir     r{n  +  ^)    L  (2sin^)i  2(2«  +  3)  (2sin^)* 

(12 - 4m2)  (32^- 4m2)^  cos  {(n  +  f)  ^-f7r  +  ^W7r}  "1 

2.4.(2/H-3)(2ri  +  5)  (2  sin  ^)^  "'J' 

obtaining  the  ranges  of  values  of  m,  n  and  ^  for  which  it  is  valid. 

(Math.  Trip.  1901.) 

39.  Shew  that  the  values  of  n,  for  which  /*„~ '"  (cos  6)  vanishes,  decrease  as  6  increases 
from  0  to  TT  when  vi  is  positive;  and  that  the  number  of  real  zeros  of  P„~"*(cos5)  for 
values  of  B  between  —n  and  tt  is  the  greatest  integer  less  than  n  —  m+l. 

(Macdonald,  Froc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxxi,  xxxiv.) 

40.  Obtain  the  formula 

-—  I    "  [1  -  2A  {cos  0)  cos  (^  +  sin  co  sin  0  cos  {6'  -  6)]  +  A^]  ~^dd=   2  k^Pn  (cos  a>)  1\  (cos  <^). 

277   j  0  «=0 

(Legendre.) 

41.  li  f{x)=x'-  (^^0)  and /(^)  =—572  (^^<;0),  shew  that,  if/(^)  can  be  expanded 
into  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  Legendre  polynomials  in  the  range  (  —  1,  1),  the 
expansion  is 


^/  N      -i  rw   X       %    ,     .,.  1.3...(2r-3)  4r  +  3  „         .   , 
f^.y^lP^x)-  ^2^  (-)'     4.6.8...2.W4^^-^^(-^)- 


(Trinity,  1893.) 
42.     If  ^- =  1  /i»(7/(3), 

(1-2A2  +  A2)''       n=0 

shew  that 

Cn  {ooxx  —  {x^  —  1)^  (^r  —  1 )-  cos  0} 

_r(2i/-i)A=n       ■^4^r(n-x  +  i){r(v+X)}2 
{r(v)P  ;,io  r(«+2v+x) 

X  (.^^  -  1)^'  (.^.^  -  1)*'  ^r:  (.r)  C^:!:  (^0  Cf  ^"-^^  (COS  c/.). 

(Gegenbauer.) 


43.  If  fTn\z)=\     {fi-Ztz^-l)-^e'dt, 

where  ej  is  the  least  root  of  ^^  —  3i;2  4- 1  =  0,  shew  that 

(2?H-l)(r„  +  i-3(2?i-l)2o-,,_i  +  2(»-l)o-„_2=0, 
and 

4  (4^3  -  1)  o-,/"  +  144sV,/'  -  z  (12rt2  -  24?i  -  291)  o-,,'  -  (n  -  3)  {2n  -  7)  (2«  +  5)  o-„  =  0, 

where  o-«"'=     -J'z^    i  etc.  (Pincherle.) 

44.  If  (A3 -3^3  +  1)-^=    2   Rn{z)li'\ 

shew  that  2  («  +  !)  /i'„  +  i -3(2h  +  ])  s^„  +  (2?i-  1)  /4_2  =  0, 

nR„  +  R\,_2-zB,:  =  0, 
and 

4(423-l)i2,/"  +  96^2/?,/'-2(l2tt2  +  24m-91)/?;-?i(2ji  +  3)(2«  +  9)/i:„  =  0, 

where  R,'"  =—,-.-,  etc.  (Pineherlo.) 


330  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XV 

obtain  the  recurrence  formula 

(7i  +  l){2n-l)A,ix)-{{4n^-l).v-\-l}Ar,.i{x-)  +  {n-l){2n  +  l)A„_^{x)=0. 

(Schendel.) 

46.  If  n  is  not  negative  and  m  is  a  positive  integei',  shew  that  the  equation 

(^2_l)g  +  (2n  +  2).^^g=m(m  +  2«+l)y 
has  the  two  solutions 

K„,{x)  =  (.v^-l)-  ^  (.^^2_  ])„.  +  „^      x^^  (a;)  =  (a^2-l)-»  ^\^^^^  K,,,{t)  dt, 

when  X  is  not  a  real  number  such  that  —  1  ^.^' ^  1. 

47.  Prove  that 

,  X  In  +  m      l      /-/"■'""*     /r2_l\» 

^  ^  T    ^  i  V  ^    „=,„,  (?i  +  to)!  ?i  d(;"  +  '»  V    2     / 

(Clare,  1901.) 


48.    If  F,,M=  i  ^^r^-^-, 

shew  that  i^„,  „  (.*--)  =  |^.  (e««  +  ^«')|^_^^  =  e^P„  (.i-,  a), 

where  P^  {.i;  a)  is  a  polynomial  of  degree  n  in  a; ;  and  deduce  that 

)• 

(Trinity,  1905.) 


d 

Pn  + 1  {X,  a)  =  {.V  +  a)  P,,  (x,  a) + x  -^  P,,  (x,  a). 


49.  If  Fn  (x)  be  the  coefficient  of  z"-  in  the  expansion  of 

2hz 

(>XZ 

phz p  —  hz 

in  ascending  powers  of  z,  so  that 

Zx-  -  h^ 
F(,  {x)  =  1,     F^  (x)  =  X,     F.  (x)  =  — - —  ,  etc., 

shew  that 

(1)     F„  {.v)  is  a  homogeneous  polynomial  of  degree  a  in  x  and  k, 

^2^    ^-^=/^„_,(..)  coi), 

(3)  f"   FJx)dx  =  0  (n^l), 

(4)  If  _y  =  a,)/^Q  {x)-\-a-^^F^  (.r)  +a2-^2  (■^)  +  --m  where  «(,,  aj,  a2i  •••  ^^<^  ''^al  constants 
then  the  mean  value  of  — ^  in  the  interval  from  x=  -  h  to  x=  +/i  is  a,..         (Leautd.) 

50.  If  F„{x)  be  defined  as  in  the  preceding  example,  shew  that,  when  —h<x<h, 


,;.COS-^+.. 


^  2..  + 1  GO  =  ( - )"'  2  ^^,,^  ^  J  (  sm  -^-  -  ^^^  sni  -  ^^     +  g,„^  ^-,  sm  -^  +  •  •  ■ 


(Appell.) 


CHAPTER  XVI 

THE  CONFLUENT  HYPERGEOMETRIC  FUNCTION 

16'1.     The  confluence  of  two  singularities  of  Riemann's  equation. 

We  have  seen  (§  10"8)  that  the  linear  differential  equation  with  two 
regular  singularities  only  can  be  integrated  in  terms  of  elementary  functions ; 
while  the  solution  of  the  linear  differential  equation  with  three  regular 
singularities  is  substantially  the  topic  of  Chapter  xiv.  As  the  next  type 
in  order  of  complexity,  we  shall  consider  a  modified  form  of  the  differential 
equation  which  is  obtained  from  Riemann's  equation  by  the  confluence  of 
two  of  the  singularities.  This  confluence  gives  an  equation  with  an  irregular 
singularity  (corresponding  to  the  confluent  singularities  of  Riemann's  equation) 
and  a  regular  singularity  corresponding  to  the  third  singularity  of  Riemann's 
equation. 

The  confluent  equation  is  obtained  by  making  c  -*  oo  in  the  equation 
defined  by  the  scheme 

[0  00         c 

1  7 

p    I  ;^  +  7?l       —  C       C  —  K 

\t.  —  m       0  k 

The  equation  in  question  is  readily  found  to  be 

(}?ii      du      (k      \  —  m-\         ^  ,.. 

We  modify  this  equation  by  writing  u  =  e~  -~Wk,m{2)  and  obtain  as  the 
equation*  for  Wjc^y^iz) 

*Z+|_J  +  ^%t-^'l,r  =  o  (B). 

dz-        \     ^      z  z-     ) 

The  reader  will  verify  that  the  singularities  of  this  equation  arc  at 
0  and  X,  the  former  being  regular  and  the  latter  irregular;  and  when  "2m 

*  This  equation  was  given  by  Whittaker,  Bulletin  American  M(Uh.  Soc.  x. 


332  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

is  not  an  integer,  two  integrals  of  equation  (B)  which  are  regular  near  0  and 
valid  for  all  finite  values  of  z  are  given  by  the  series 

M^^,,\z}-z        e        |^  +  i,(2m+l)^    2\{%n  +  l){2m  +  2)    '^■"]' 

^r        /x        4-j»   -i?  (-.        ^  —  m  —  k  (l  —  m  —  k)(%  —  m  —  k)   „ 

*,_..(.)  =  .4    "e    "  |l  +  1^  (132^)  ^  +    2 !  (1  -  2iV(2  -  2m)    '  + 

These  series  obviously  form  a  fundamental  system  of  solutions. 

[Note.     Series  of  the  type  in  { }  were  first  considered  by  Kummer*  and  more  recently 

by  Jacobsthalt  and  Barnes  J.     In  the  notation  of  Kummer,  modified  by  Barnes,  they  would 

be  written  ^Fi  {\±m-k;  ±2m  +  l ;  z);  the  reason  for  discussing  solutions  of  equation  (B) 

(j   7/  (ill 

rather  than  those  of  the  equation  z-j^~{z- p)  ~'--ai/  =  0,   of  which  iFi{a;p;z)  is  a 

solution,  is  the  greater  appearance  of  symmetry  in  the  formulae,  together  with  a  simplicity 
in  the  equations  giving  various  functions  of  Applied  Mathematics  (see  §  16-2)  in  terms  of 
solutions  of  equation  (B).] 

16'11.     Kummer  s  formulae. 

(I)  We  shall  now  shew  that,  if  2«i  is  not  a  negative  integer,  then 

0 -  4  -  '«7lf,,,,  {z)  =  (-  ^)  -  i  -  "M-it,,.  (-  z), 
that  is  to  say, 

^  +  m  —  k  {\-\- m  —  k){^-{-m  —  k)  „ 

^  1!(27H  +  1)^''"    2!(2m  +  l)(2m  +  2)  ^"^■" 
_  l  +  m^  {\  +  mfk){^rn^k)    „_ 

~        1  !  (2w  +1)  ^  "^    2  !  (2m  +  1)  (2m  +  2)  ^'      * ' " 

For,  replacing  e"^  by  its  expansion  in  powers  of  z,  the  coefficient  of  z"^  in 
the  product  of  absolutely  convergent  series  on  the  left  is 

11  \        V  I        n\    V{iin-{-\^-k)V  (2m  + 1  +  n) 

by  §  14'11,  and  this  is  the  coefficient  of  ^"  on  the  right§;  we  have  thus 
obtained  the  required  result. 

This  will  be  called  Kummer  s  first  formula. 

(II)  The  equation 

°'"'^  ^"'"         i'^,ri2^^.^!(m  +  l)(m  +  2)...(m  +  j9)[' 

valid  when  2m  is  not  a  negative  integer,  will  be  called  Kummer  s  second 
formula. 

*  Crelle,  xv.  p.  139.  t  3Iath.  Ann.  lvi.  pp.  129-154. 

%  Trans.  Cmnh.  Phil.  Sor.  xx.  pp.  253-279. 

§  The  result  is  still  true  when  m  +  h  +  k  is  a  negative  integer,  by  a  slight  modification  of  the 
analysis  of  §  14-11. 


16*11,  1612]        THE   CONFLUENT  HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  333 

To  prove  it  we  observe  that  the  coefficient  of  2"+"' +  7  j^  the  product 

of  which  the  second  and  third  factors  possess  absolutely  convergent  expansions,  is  (§  3'73) 

w!  (2»i  +  l)(2m  +  2)...(2w+n)     ^       '  '  2         >  ./ 

(it  +  m)(^  +  m)  ...(n-m  +  h)     i,/     1  1  ,1  i\ 

=  —,-,^       \\  ,r.-      ?i^ —  /., —  \  F(  -  hi,  -m-hi;  -n  +  -k-m;  1), 

n\  {2m  +  l){2m  +  2)...{2m  +  n)     ^2)  2    »  2        >     /. 

by  Rummer's  relation* 

F{2a,  2^;  a-\-$  +  ^',  x)  =  F{a,  fi;  a+fi+^;  4x  (l-.v)}, 

valid  when  0^.»^^;  and  so  the  coefficient  of  /^  +  "*  +  ^  (by  §  14-11)  is 

{^  +  m){^+m)  ...{n-m+^)     _r {-n  +  ^-r-m)  r^|) 
»!  (2m  +  l)(2>n  +  2)  ...  (2m  +  n)  r(^-m-|n)  r('|-^») 

^  r(i-m)r(i) 

/^ !  (2?tt  +  1 )  (2m + 2) . . .  (2»i  +  /i)  r  (^  -  m  -  hi)  T{h-  \n) ' 
and  when  n  is  odd  this  vanishes;  for  even  values  of  n  {  =  2p)  it  is 

r(i-m)(-i)(-f)...(|-p) 

-      2p\  2:^P{m-irh){in+f)  ...{m+p-h)  (m  +  1)  (m+2) ...  (wi+^)  r  (i-m-^) 
1.3...(2/)-l)  1 


2j9!  23p(//i  +  l)(«i  +  2)  ...  {m+p)      2^P.^!(//i  +  l)(m  +  2)...(m+jo)' 

16*12.     Definition^  of  the  function   Wk,m{z)- 

The  solutions  ii;fc,±„i,(^)  of  equation  (B)  of  §  16'1  are  not,  however,  the 
most  convenient  to  take  as  the  standard  solutions,  on  account  of  the 
disappearance  of  one  of  them  when  ^.m  is  an  integer. 

The  integral  obtained  by  confluence  from  that  of  §  14"6,  when  multiplied 

by  a  constant  multiple  of  e'-^  ,  is;|; 

It  is  supposed  that  arg  z  has  its  principal  value  and  that  the  contour  is  so 
chosen  that  the  point  t=  —  z  is  outside  it.  The  integrand  is  rendered  one- 
valued  by  taking  j  arg  (—  ^)  [  $  tt  and  taking  that  value  of  arg  (1  -f-  tjz)  which 
tends  to  zero  as  ^  -*  0  by  a  path  lying  inside  the  contour. 

Under  these  circumstances  it  follows  from  §  5'32  that  the  integral  is  an 
analytic  function  of  z.     To  shew  that  it  satisfies  equation  (B),  write 

CO 

*  See  Chapter  xiv,  examples  12  and  13,  p.  292. 

t  The  function  W,^^„^{z)  was  defined  by  means  of  an  integral  in  this  manner  by  Wliittaker, 
loc.  cit.,  p.  125. 

X  A  suitable  contour  has  been  chosen  and  the  variable  f  of  §  ll-G  replaced  by  -  t. 


334  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

and  we  have  without  difficulty* 

^      /2^'_    \c?iJ     l-m''  +  k{k-l) 

dz^      \  z         )  dz  z'^ 

=  0, 

since  the  expression  in  |  }  tends  to  zero  as  ^  -»►  +  oo  ;  and  this  is  the  condition 
that  e~^^z^v  should  satisfy  (B). 

Accordingly  the  function  Wk^mi^)  defined  by  the  integral 

-_L.r(i  +  l-,„).-»^//"'-^'(-0-*-4+"'(i  +  J)'"*^'".-'rf« 

is  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation  (B). 

The  formula  for  Wk,m{z)  becomes  nugatory  when  k  —  ^  —  m  is  a  negative 
integer.     To  overcome  this  difficulty,  we  observe  that  luhenever 

R(k-l-m]<0 


2 

and  k—  V)—  m  is  not  an  integer,  we  may  transform  the  contour  integral  into 
an  infinite  integral,  after  the  manner  of  §  12'22 ;  and  so,  when 

R  [k  —  ^  —  m]  ^0, 


This  formula  suffices  to  define  Tfjfc,,„(^)  in  the  critical  cases  when 
m-\--^—k  is  a  positive  integer,  and  so  Ti^A;,w('2')  is  defined  for  all  values  of 
k  and  m  and  all  values  of  z  except  negative  real  values f. 


Example.     Solve  the  equation 

<F-u  ,  (     ,  b  ,   c^ 


in  tet-ms  of  functions  of  the  type  TF^.^  ^,^  (z),  where  a,  b,  c  are  any  constants. 

16'2.     Expressio7i  of  various  functions  hy  functions  of  the  type  W]c,m{z)- 

It  has  been  shewn;]:  that  various  functions  employed  in  Applied  Mathe- 
matics are  expressible  by  means  of  the  function  TF;t,;»  {z)\  the  following  are  a 
few  examples : 

*  The  differentiations  under  the  sign  of  integration  are  legitimate  by  §  4-44  corollary. 

t  When  z  is  real  and  negative,  Wj,,^{z)  may  be  defined  to  be  either  JFj.,„j(2  +  0(:)  or 
TFj.  „j  {z  -  Oi),  whichever  is  more  convenient. 

X  Whittaker,  Bulletin  American  Math.  Soc.  x. ;  this  paper  contains  a  more  complete  account 
than  is  given  here. 


16*2]  THE   CONFLUENT   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  335 

(I)  The  Error  function*  which  occurs  in  connexion  with  the  theories  of 
Probability,  Errors  of  Observation,  Refraction  and  Conduction  of  Heat  is 
defined  by  the  equation 

Erfc  (a?)  =  r  e-''dt, 
where  x  is  real. 

Writing  <=a;-(w'^  — 1)  and  then  w  =  s/a;  in  the  integral  for  W_i  i(x^), 
we  get 

and  so  the  error  function  is  given  by  the  formula 

Erfc  (cc)  =  ^  a;-*e-*-^'F_^,  ^  (x'). 

Other  integrals  which  occur  in  connexion  with  the  theory  of  conduction 

of  heat,  e.g.   I  e~^'~^''*''dt,  can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  error  functions,  and 

so  in  terms  of  Wk,m  functions. 

Example.     Shew  that  the  formula  for  the  error  function  is  true  for  complex  values  of  x. 

(II)  The  Incomplete  Gamma  function,  studied  by  Legendre  and  others + 
is  defined  by  the  equation 

r^{n,  x)=  jP'-'e-'dt. 

By  writing  t  =  s  —  x  in  the  integral  for  14'^/,j_ix  i,j(«),  the  reader  will 
verity  that 

7(n,^-)  =  rOO-^*(«-i).--^Tf,(„_i),,,(^.). 

(III)  The  Logarithmic-integral  function,  which  has  been  discussed  by 
Euler  and  others  j,  is  defined,  when  |  arg  {—  log  2]\  <  tt,  by  the  equation 

,.  ,  ,       ['   dt 

*  This  name  is  also  applied  to  the  function 

Erf  (x)  =  I  ""  <--«"  dt  =  Tri  -  Erfc  (x). 


t  Legendre,  Exercicen,  i.  p.  289;  Hocevar,  Zcitxc.hrift  fijr  Math.  xxi.  p.  449;  Schluniilcli, 
Zeittichrift  filr  Matli.  xvi.  yy.  261  ;  Prym,  Crelle,  lxxxii.  p.  1G5. 

X  Euler,  Iimt.  Cede.  Int.  i.  ;  Soldner,  Moiiatliclie  Corre.'ipojidenz,  von  Zach  (ISll),  p.  182; 
Briefwechsel  zwischen  Gauss  und  Bessel  (1880),  pp.  114-12(J;  Bessel,  Krinuinberfjt'r  Archir,  1812; 
Laguerre,  Bulletin  de  la  Soc.  .Math,  de  France,  vii.  (1879);  Stieltjes,  Ann.  de  I'Kc.  Svrin.  Sup. 
ser.  3,  t.  III.  The  logarithmic-integral  function  is  of  considerable  importance  in  the  highe) 
parts  of  the  Theory  of  Prime  Numbers.     See  Landau,  Prnnzahlen,  p.  11. 


336  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

On  writing  s  —  log  z  =  u  and  then  u  =  —  log  t  in  the  integral  for 

^-J,o(-log^), 
it  may  be  verified  that 

li  (2)  =  -{-  log  z)'hiW_.^Q(-  log z). 

It  will  appear  later  that  Weber's  Parabolic  Cylinder  functions  (§  16'5)  and 
Bessel's  Circular  Cylinder  functions  (Chapter  xvii)  are  particular  cases  of  the 
Wjc,m  function.  Other  functions  of  like  nature  are  given  in  the  Miscellaneous 
Examples  at  the  end  of  this  chapter. 

[Note.  The  error  function  has  been  tabulated  by  Encke,  Berliner  ast.  Jahrhuch,  1834, 
and  Burgess,  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  Edin.  xxxix.  The  logarithmic-integral  function  has  been 
tabulated  by  Bessel  and  by  Soldner.  Jahnke  und  Emde,  Funktiontafeln  (Leipzig,  1909), 
and  Glaisher,  Factor  Tables.,  should  also  be  consulted.] 

16'3.     The  asymptotic  expansion  of  Wk, m  (2),  when  \z\  is  large. 

From  the  contour  integral  by  which  Tf  i,  ,„  (z)  was  defined,  it  is  possible 
to  obtain  an  asymptotic  expansion  for  Wk^  ^  (z)  valid  when  |  arg  z\<  ir. 

For  this  purpose,  we  employ  the  result  given  in  Chap.  V,  example  6,  that 

V'^'z)^^'^  \z  +  •••  + n\ J-  +  ^'^^^'  ^)' 

where 

Rn{t,  Z)  =       ^ ^--^ ^^  (1  +  -)    j^      U-  (1  +  u)-'-^du. 

Substituting  this  in  the  formula  of  §16*12,  and  integrating  term-by-term, 
it  follows  from  the  result  of  §  12-22  that 

r,„.(.)= .-*'/ ji  +  ^!i_(^y^f.»'-(^-CTN^--(^-»)i ^ ...    . 

{m'  -{k-  If]  \m'  -  (k  -  ^y]  . . .  {m^  -(k-  n  +  m 


+ 


n !  z'- 
k-h  +  m 


provided  that  n  be  taken  so  large  that  R  yn  —  k  —  .,-(-  /h]  >  0. 

Now  if  I  arg  z\^'7r  —  a  and  U  j  >  1,  then 

1^1(14-^/^)1^1+^         R(z)^0 

1(1  +  ^/5)1^  sin  a  R{z)^0 

and  so* 

X(X-l)...(X-n):,,    ,  ,,„,, ,„,  /-K^/--)! 


Rn  (t,  Z)  i  ^ 


(1  -1-O'^'(coseca)l^l  iO'{l-¥u)\^\du. 

J  {) 


*  It  is  supposed  that  \  is  real ;  tlie  inequality  has  to  be  slightly  moJified  for  coniiDlex  values 
of  X. 


16-3-16'4]  THE   CONFLUENT  HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  337 

Therefore 

<  I H^-'^)^-^-(^-n)  I  ^j  _^  ^)1A| (cosec a)l^l  | (t/z)  \^+'  (1  +  0'^'  (^  +  1)"S 
since  I  +u<l  +  t. 

Therefore,  when  1 2^  |  >  1, 

r(-A;  +  ^  +  w;Jo 

=  0  (z—^), 

since  the  integral  converges.  The  constant  implied  in  the  symbol  0  is 
independent  of  arg  z,  but  depends  on  a,  and  tends  to  infinity  as  a  -*  0. 

That  is  to  say,  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  W]c^rn{z)  is  given  by  the  formula 

(       M=i  nl  2  ) 

for  large  values  of  \z\  when  \  arg 2  [  ^ tt  —  a <  tt. 

16*31.     The  second  solution  of  the  equation  for   Wj^^^ni^)- 

The  differential  equation  (B)  of  §16'1  satisfied  by  W]c,m{z)  is  unaltered  if 
the  signs  of  z  and  k  are  changed  throughout. 

Hence,  if  |  arg {—  z)\<  ir,  PF_a;,„i (—  z)  is  a  solution  of  the  equation. 

Since,  when  |  arg  z\<  ir, 

Wj,,,„(z)  =  e-^'z^{l  +  0(z-'^)], 

whereas,  when  |  arg  ( -  2^)  j  <  tt, 

W_,,,,(-z)  =  ei^-zy^{l  +  0{z-% 

the  ratio  Wic^,,^{z)/W-k,m(—  2)  cannot  be  a  constant,  and  so  Wi;^),^(z)  and 
^V^-k,m(—z)  form  a  fundamental  system  of  solutions  of  the  ditferential 
equation. 

16"4.     Contour  integrals  of  Barnes   type  for   Wk,  ,,>  (^)- 

Consider  now 

.  e^}^  /•-■   r{s)ri-s-k-m+^)r{-s-k  +  m  +  ^J 

where  |  arg  z\<  \^tt,  and  neither  of  the  numbers  k  ±  m  +  .,  is  a  positive  integer 


338  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

or  zero*;  the  contour  has  loops  if  necessary  so  that  the  poles  of  r(s)  and 
those  of  r(  —  s  —  k  —  m  +  2)  r[  —  s  —  A^  +  m  +  g)  are  on  opposite  sides  of  it. 

It  is  easily  verified,  by  §  IS  6,  that,  as  s^  qo  on  the  contour, 

r  (s)  r  (-  s  -  k-m  +  l^  r  (-  s  -  k  +  m  +  1)  =  0  (e-^''^'^  \s\-^^-^), 

and  so  the  integral  represents  a  function  of  z  which  is  analytic  at  all  pointsf 

3  3 

in  the  domain  |  arg  2;\%2'^~^'^2''^- 

Now  choose  N  so  that  the  poles  of  T  (—  s  —  k  —  m  +  ^]  T  (-  s  —  k  +  m  +  ;^] 
are  on  the  right  of  the  line  R  (s)  =^  —  N  —  2',  and  consider  the  integral  taken 

round  the  rectangle  whose  corners  are  ±  ^i,  -  i\^  —  2  ±  ^h  where  ^  is  positive:!: 

and  large. 

3 
The  reader  will  verify  that,  when  ]  arg^^  |  ^2'^  ~  ^'  ^^®  integrals 


N-i-^i  r-N-i  +  ^i 

tend  to  zero  as  |  ^  go  ;  and  so,  by  Cauchy's  theorem, 
g - i^ ^'^  /•  00 i   r{s)r(-s-k-m  +^)r(-s-k  +  m  +  ^) 


^TTi    J -ooi      '      r{-k-m  +  i)r{-k  +  m  +  ^) 


z^ds 


^       Ar ..  ^  +  cc  i  r  {s)V{-s-k-m  +  i,)V{-s-k  +  m  +  i)         ) 
+  27^^■j_;,_^_^,  r(-A;-m+4)T(-^  +  m  +  ^)  ''    '}' 

where  i^„  is  the  residue  of  the  integrand  at  5  =  —  «. 

Write  s  =  —  iV  —  ^  +  lY,  and  the  modulus  of  the  last  integrand  is 

\z\-''-^0[e--\'\\t\'''''\ 
where  the  constant  implied  in  the  symbol  0  is  independent  of  z. 


Since    I       g-aiti  \t\^'~-^dt  converges,  we  find  that 


in=0  '  } 

*  In  these  cases  the  series  of  §  16-3  terminates  and  Wic,„^[z)  is  a  combination  of  elementary 
functions. 

t  The  integral  is  rendered  one-valued  when  R(z)  <(i  by  si)ecif}ing  arg  z. 

%  The  line  joining  ±t'  niay  have  loops  to  avoid  poles  of  the  integrand  as  ex])lained  above. 


16'4]  THE   CONFLUENT   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  339 

But,  on  calculating  the  residue  Rn,  we  get 

_r(n-k-m+i!)T(7i-k  +  m  +  ^) 

^  {m"  -  (k  -  I)'}  {m'  -  (k  -  f )"}  . . .  {m='  -  (A;  -  71  +  hf] 

nlz" 

and  so  7  has  the  same  asymptotic  expansion  as  Wk^^ni'^)- 

Further    /    satisfies    the    differential    equation    for    Wk^mi^)',    for>   on 

substituting    I        T (s)  V  (—  s  —  k  —  m  +  2)  ^  [  —  (>'  —  k  +  m  +  A  z^ds  for  v  in 

the  expression  (given  in  §  16*12) 

we .  get 

p'  T{s)V(-s-k-m  +  ^^  vl-s-k  +  m^^^^ds 

-T'  T{s-vl)v{-s-  k-m  +  1]  r  [-6--  ^  +  m  +  g)  0*+ic;s 

=  (["'.-  ['^"1  r  (s)  r  (-  s  -  ^^  -  m  +  I)  r  f-  s  -  A;  +  m  +  ^j  2*d6'. 

Since  there  are  no  poles  of  the  last  integrand  between  the  contours,  and 
since  the  integrand  tends  to  zero  as  { 5  |  ^  00  ,  s  being  between  the  contours, 
the  expression  under  consideration  vanishes,  by  Cauchy's  theorem ;  and  so 
I  satisfies  the  equation  for  Wk,mi^)- 

Therefore  I  =  AWk,,n  (^)  +  BW^k,^,^  (-  2), 

where  A  and  B  are  constants.     Making  |  ^  j  ^  x  when  R(2)>0  we  see,  from 
the  asymptotic  expansions  obtained  for  /  and  W±k,m{+  ^)>  that 

^  =  1,     B  =  0. 
Accordingly,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  the  equality 

i=WkM^) 

persists  for  all  values  of  z  such  that  j  arg  2r  j  <  tt  ;  and,  for  values*  of  arg  ^ 
such  that  TT  ^  j  arg  z\  <  ,^  tt,  Tf^■,„(  (z)  may  be  defined  to  be  the  expression  /. 
Example  1.     Shew  that 

IV     fA-"!^  r"'  r(^-/(-)r(-.s-;;^  +  i)r(-^+y».+A).,  , 

"'""^  '~~27ri   J  _-,,i         r(-y(--/«  +  i)r(-/(-  +  m  +  |) 

taken  along  a  suitable  contour. 

*  It  would  have  been  possible,  by  modifying  the  path  of  integration  in  §  16-3,  to  have  shewn 
that  that  integral  could  be  made  to  define  an  analytic  function  when  |  arg  z  |  <  jtt.  But  the 
reader  will  see  that  it  is  unnecessary  to  do  so,  as  Barnes'  integral  affords  a  simpler  definition 
of  the  function. 

o  o       •) 


340  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 


Example  2.     Obtain  Barnes'  integral  for  IFj.,  „j  (2)  by  writing 

_   i^'    

2iTi  J -^i         T{-k-m  +  l) 

for  (1  +t/z)      '^'^'"^  in  the  integral  of  §  16'12  and  changing  the  order  of  integration. 


1      j'-'    ris)T{-s-k-vi  +  ^)^^^_^^^ 


16"41.     Relations  between  Wjc,  m  (2)  f^"c^  ^h,  ±m  (^)- 
If  we  take  the  expression 

F(s)  =  V(s)v(-s-k-m  +  f\  r  (-s-k  +  m  +  l) 

which  occurs  in  Barnes'  integral  for  W^.,  ,„  (z),  and  write  it  in  the  form 

ir'-Tis) 

r  {s  +  k  +  m  +  ^)T  (s  +  k  —  m  +  ^)  cos  {s  +  k  +  m)  tt  cos  (s  +  A;  —  m)  tt  ' 

we  see,  by  §  13"6,  that,  when  R  {s)  ^  0,  we  have,  as  j  s  j  ^  00  , 


F{.)  =  0 


exp  ■]  (  —  s  -  ^  —  2^• )  log  s  +  s 


sec  (.§  +  h  +  m)  tt  sec  {s  +  k  —  m)  tt. 


Hence,    if   |arg^'j<27r,    jF{s)z^ds,  taken    round    a    semicircle    on   the 

right  of  the  imaginary  axis,  tends  to  zero  as  the  radius  of  the  semicircle 
tends  to  infinity,  provided  the  lower  bound  of  the  distance  of  the  semi- 
circle from  the  poles  of  the  integrand  is  positive  (not  zero). 

Therefore      Wh  ,„  (z)=  -  .^  y-j  ,  x  U  7     7^  ,s. 

where  SJ?'  denotes  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  F(s)  at  its  poles  on  the 
right  of  the  contour  (cf.  §  14'5)  which  occurs  in  equation  (C)  of  §  IG'4. 

Evaluating  these  residues  we  find  without  difficulty  that,  when 

iarg^|<.^7r, 
and  2m  is  not  an  integer*, 

-iir        /  N  r(— 2//^)        -,         ,  ^  T  (2l}l) 

w,.  „  (.)  =  J,  ^^'-  ^^ _'^.^  ih, „  (.)  +  p  ^^  y^^^  >_ ^^^^  M,,  _„. (4 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  when  j  arg  {  —  z)  \  <  Stt  and  2»i  i.s  not  an  integer, 
W  ,     (-r\~    r(-2«0  r(2m) 

(Earnest.) 
Example  2.     When  -  .W  <  arg  2  <  f  tt  and  -  'in  <  arg  (  -  i)  <  Itt,  .shew  that 

*  When  2m  is  an  integer  some  of  the  poles  are  generally  double  poles,  and  their  residues 
involve  logarithms  of  z.  The  result  has  not  been  proved  when  h  -  i±m  is  a  positive  integer  or 
zero,  but  may  be  obtained  for  such  values  of  h  and  m  by  comparing  the  terminating  series  for 

t  Barnes'  results  are  given  in  the  notation  explained  in  §  IG'l. 


16'41-16"51]    THE  CONFLUENT  HYPERGEOMETRIC  FUNCTION  341 

Example  3.     Obtain  Kummer's  first  formula  (§  16-11)  from  the  result 

1     /"*■ 
z^e~*  —  - — .  I         T(n~8)  z'ds.  (Barnes.) 


16'5.     The  parabolic  cylinder  functions.     Weber's  equation. 


it   IS 


Consider   the   differential   equation    satisfied   by   w  =  z    *  W^  _ ,  ( 

this  reduces  to  -j-^  +  \2k  —  jz'^l  w  =  0. 

Therefore  the  function 

satisfies  the  differential  equation 

Accordingly  Dn{z)  is  one  of  the  functions  associated  with  the  parabolic 
cylinder  in  harmonic  analysis*;  the  equation  satisfied  by  it  will  be  called 
Weber's  equation. 

From  §  16'41,  it  follows  that 
when  I  arg  z\<-^'ir. 

and   these  are   one-valued  analytic  functions  of  z  throughout  the  ^•-plane. 
Accordingly  Dn  {z)  is  a  one-valued  function  of  z  throughout  the  2^-plane  ;  and, 

3 
by  §  16'4,  its  asymptotic  expansion  when  |  arg^^  j  <  j  tt  is 

^  - 12-   "  (i       'U'i  -  1 )  ,  n  {n  -  1)  {n  -  2)  (n  -  8) 

(  ^z-  2Az* 

16"51.     The  second  solution  of  Weber's  equation. 

Since  Weber's  equation  is  unaltered  if  we  simultaneously  replace  n 
and  z  by  —  ?i  —  1  and  ±  iz  respectively,  it  follows  that  D_u~iii^)  -^^id 
D^n-i{~iz)  are  solutions  of  Weber's  equation,  as  is  also  D,^{—z). 

*  Weber,  Math.  Ann.  i.;  Wbittaker,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxxv. 


342  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

It  is  obvious  from  the  asymptotic  expansions  of  Dn(z)  and  Z)_,i_i  (^e^'^*), 
valid  in  the  range  —  ^  vr  <  arg  z<  tt,  that  the  ratio  of  these  two  solutions  is 
not  a  constant. 

16'511.     The  relation  between  the  functions  Dn{z),  D_n-i{±  iz). 
From  the  theory  of  linear  differential  equations,  a  relation  of  the  form 
Dn  {z)  =  aD_n-i  (iz)  +  bD_n-i  (-  iz) 
must  hold  when  the  ratio  of  the  functions  on  the  right  is  not  a  constant. 

To  obtain  this  relation,  we  observe  that  if  the  functions  involved  be 
expanded  in  ascending  powers  of  z,  the  expansions  are 


jr(i)2;:^^_r(-i)22l;^.       ) 

+  'l    T{l+in)  r{^  +  ^n)       ''+■■']■ 

Comparing  the  first  two  terms  we  get 

a  =  (27r)-*  r  0^+1)  e•^"'^^      b  =  (27r)-*  r(n+  1)  e"^' 
and  so 

Anwi 


i).(.)=^^^^^^ 


e^'"^'i)_„_l(^■^)  +  e-■^"'^'i)_,_l(-^■^) 


V(27r)     L 

16'52.     The  general  asymptotic  expansion  of  Dn(z). 

So  far  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  i)„  (z)  for  large  values  of  z  has  only 

been  given  (§  16"5)  in  the  sector  |arg2:|  < /Tt.     To  obtain  its  form  for  values 

of  arg z  not  comprised  in  this  range  we  write  —  iz  for  z  and  —n—1  for  n  in 
the  formula  of  the  preceding  section,  and  get 

A.  (.)  =  ."'^^'  A.(-  z)  +  f^^^  ^  ("+^)  '^^  i)_._,  (-  iz). 

5  1 

Now,  if  I  TT  >  arg  z  >  -^'jt,  we  can  assign  to  -  ^  and  —  iz  arguments  between 

3  ,  1 

±  ^  TT ;  and  arg  (—  z)  =  arg  z  —ir,  arg  (—  iz)  =  arg  ^  —  g  tt  ;  and  then,  applying 

the  asymptotic  expansion  of  §  16"5  to  Dn(— z)  and  l)_n-i{—iz),  we  see  that, 

...5  1 

if  I  TT  >  arg  ^  >  ^  TT, 

r,   i.\      o-i~-^''U       n{n-l)      nin-l)in-1){n-Z)  \ 

V(27r)     nTTi    }  z-^    -«-![-,       (n  +  1)  (n  +  2) 
1  i-n)  [  2z" 

(n  +  l){n  +  2)(n  +  S){n-h4<) 


16-51 1-16-6]   THE  CONFLUENT  HYPERGEOMETRIC  FUNCTION  343 

This  formula  is  not  inconsistent  with  that  of  §  16'5  since  in  their  common  range  of 
validity,  viz.  Jrr  <arg3  <  |»r,  e^    2-2h-i  is  o(z~"^)  for  all  i)Ositivc  values  of  m. 

1  3 

To  obtain  a  formula  valid  in  the  range  —  ^ tt  >  arg z  >  ^ir,  we  use  the 
formula 

Dn{z)  =  e         ^"^~^^  +  r(-wV  D-n-ii^Z), 

and  we  get  an  asymptotic  expansion  which  differs  from  that  which  has  just 
been  obtained  only  in  containing  e  ~  "'^^  in  place  of  e"'^*. 

Since  Dn  (z)  is  one- valued  and  one  or  other  of  the  expansions  obtained 
is  valid  for  all  values  of  arg  z  in  the  range  —tt^  arg  z  ^tt,  the  complete 
asymptotic  expansion  of  D„  (z)  has  been  obtained. 

16*6.     A  contour  integral  for  Dn  (z). 

Consider  I  e'^^~^^'  {-t)-'^-'^dt,  where  |arg(-0l<7r;  it  represents  a  one-valued 
analytic  function  of  z  throughout  the  s-plane  (§  5-32)  and  further 

the.  differentiations  under  the  sign  of  integration  being  easily  justified;  accordingly  the 
integral  satisfies  the  differential  equation  satisfied  by  e"^^  Dn  {z) ;  and  therefore 

e-^'-   r^\-~^--^^^\-t)'^-'dt  =  aDn{.z)  +  hD_r,.x{iz), 

where  a  and  h  are  constants. 

Now,  if  the  expression  on  the  right  be  called  E^  (2),  we  have 

^,^(0)=  e--~U-t)-^'-'dt,      En'{0)=  e-i^  {-t)-dt. 

J    cc  ./go 

To  evaluate  these  integrals,  which  are  analytic  functions  of  /i,  we  suppose  first  that 
^(«)<0;   then,  deforming  the  paths  of  integration,  we  get 

En(0)= -2inin{n  +  l)7j-    I     e"^^' t-''-'^dt 

/GO 

=  2'"4"isin(?i7r)r(-|H). 

Similarly  En'  (0)  =  -  2^  ~  i"  i  sin  (mr)  r  (J  -  hi). 

Both  sides  of  these  equations  being  analytic  functions  of  n,  the  equations  are  true  for 
all  values  of  n ;  and  therefore 

b^O,     a  =  ^^  ^ -  "  -/'^  2  ^  ^"  i  sin  («7r)  r  ( -  hi) 

r(,i.)2-" 

=  2ir  (  -  ii)  sin  /in. 
Therefore  D,.{z)^ -"^^  e'^^  j'^^'e' ^^~^^  (-t)-'^'^  dt. 


344  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVI 

16*61.     Recurrence  formulae  for  D-n{z). 
From  the  equation 

=  1         ^.  —  z{—t)  +{-t)      +(^i+l)(— 0  \^         ^  at, 

after  using  §  16"6,  we  see  that 

Further,  by  differentiating  the  integral  of  §  16'6,  it  follows  that 

Exam'ple.     Obtain  these  results  from  the  ascending  power  series  of  5^  16  "5. 

16"7.     Properties  of  i)„  (z)  when  n  is  an  integer. 

When  n  is  an  integer,  we  may  write  the  integral  of  §  16'6  in  the  form 

at. 


(-  0"+i 

If  now  we  write  t  =  v  —  z,  we  get 


(-r^'^.(e-n 


a  result  due  to  Hermite*. 


Also,  if  m  and   ??    be    unequal    integers,  we    see    from   the    differential 
equations  that 

fJn  (z)  Dm"  {z)  -  D>„  {z)  Dn"  (z)  +  {m  -  n)  A«  (z)  A.  (z)  =  0, 
and  so 


{m  -  n)         Dy,  {z)  Bn  (z)  dz  = 

J    —00 


D,{z)DJ{z)-D,„{z)D,:{z) 


=  0, 

by  the  expansion  of  §  16'5  in  descending  j)owers  of  z  (which  terminates 
and  is  valid  for  all  values  of  arg^^  when  n  is  a  positive  integer). 

Therefore  if  ni  and  n  are  unequal  jjositive  integers 
r    D,„{z)Dn{z)dz  =  0. 

J    —00 

*  Comptes  liendus,  lviii.  pp.  2G6-273. 


16"61,  16'7]  THE   CONFLUENT   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  345 

On  the  other  hand,  when  m  =  n,  we  have 
(n  +  l)r    [l)n{z)Ydz 

J   —CD 

=  j         Dn(z)\-  Dn+,'  (z)  +  I  zDn+i  (z)\  dz 
=  r      {Dn^,{z)Ydz, 

J    —CO  ' 

on  using  the  recurrence  formula,  integrating  by  parts  and  then  using  the 
recurrence  formula  again. 

It  follows  by  induction  that 

r    [Bn{z)Ydz  =  n\r    {D,{z)Ydz 

J    -  X  J    —cc 

=  nl  I       e"^^  dz 


—  cc 


=  (27r)*w!, 
by  §  12-14  corollary  1  and  §  12-2. 

It  follows  at  once  that  if,  for  a  function /(^r),  an  expansion  of  the  form 

f{z)  =  cioDo  (z)  +  a,D,  {z)  +  ...  +  anDniz)+  ... 

exists,  and  if  it  is  legitimate  to  integrate  term-by-term  between  the  limits 
—  00  and  oc  ,  then 


««=-7^-,r      Dn{t)f{t)dt 


REFERENCES. 

W.  Jacobsthal,  Math.  Ann.  Bd.  lvi.  \\\).  129-154. 

E.  W.  Barnes,  Trans.  Camh.  Phil.  Soc.  Vol.  xx.  pp.  253-279. 

E.  T.  Whittaker,  Bulletin  American  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  x.  pp.  125-134. 

H.  Weber,  Math.  Ann.  Bd.  i.  pp.  1-36. 

A.  Adamoff,  Ann.de  rinstitut  P oly technique  cle  St  Petershourg,  t.  V.  (1906),  p^).  127-143. 

E.  T.  Whittaker,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  xxxv.  pp.  417-427. 

G.  N.  Watson,  Proc  London  Math.  Soc.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  viir.  pp.  393-421. 

H.  E.  J.  CuRZON,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  Ser.  2,  Vol.  xii.  pp.  236-2.")9. 

A.  Milne,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  Vol.  xxxii.  pp.  2-14,  Vol.  xxxiii.  pp.  48-64. 


346  the  transcendental  functions  [chap.  xvi 

Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that 

provided  that  the  constants  are  chosen  so  that  the  integral  converges. 

2.  Shew  that 

-^h,  m  (2) =s*  "^ '"  e  ~  *^  lim  F{^  +  m  -  /(•,  ^  +  m  -  /(;+p ;  2m  +  1 ;  s/p). 

3.  Obtain  the  recurrence  formulae 

4.  Prove  that    W,,^„,{2)  is  the  integral   of   an   elementary  function  when  either  of 
the  numbers  k-^±77i  is  a  negative  integer. 

5.  Shew  that  by  a  suitable  change  of  variables,  the  equation 


,         ,     .  d-y     ,        T     .  di/     ,        ,     , 

{a.2  +  h^x)  ^  +  («!  +  6, x)  ^^  +  (ffo  +  Kx) y=.0 


can  be  brought  to  tiie  form 


%?+(«-«  i-<.,=o, 


and  that  this  equation  is  derived  from  the  eqviation  for  F  {a,b;  c;  x)  hy  writing  x—^jh  and 
making  6  -*  x  . 

6.  Shew  that  the  cosine  integral  of  Schlomilch  and  liesso  {Giornale  di  Matematicke^ 
VI.),  defined  by  the  equation 

Ci(.-)=  /""~c?< 
when  I  arg  z  \  <  ^tt,  may  be  written  in  the  form 

Ci(.)=iz--iei'^+i'^Mr_^^o(-i^)+|s-i«-i'~-^'^Mr_i_o  (/.'). 

7.  Express  the  functions 

Si  {z)=['  ^~  dt,     Ei  (z)  =r  '''--  dt 

J  0         i  J  rj         ( 

in  terms  of  (Tj.  „j  functions. 

8*.     Shew  that  Sonine's  polynomicil  {Math.  Ann.  xvi.  p.  41) 

f »  ^n  - 1  ««  -  2 

T  "■(z)= - I - 

'"'  ^  ^      H\im  +  n)lO]      {a-l)l{m  +  n-l)\ll^{n-2)l{m  +  n-2)l2l     '"' 

where  n  is  an  integei',  may  be  expressed  in  tlie  form 

*  The  results  of  examples  8,  9,  10  were  communicated  to  us  by  Mr  Bateman, 


THE  CONFLUENT   HYPERGEOMETRIC   FUNCTION  347 

9.  Shew  that  Abel's  function  <f>m  (z)  defined  (Oeuvres,  1881,  p.  284)  as  the  coefficient  of 
A"»  in  the  expansion  of  (1  -A)"ie~**Ai-ft)  is  expressed  by  the  equation 

10.  Shew  that  the  Pearson-Cunningham  function  {Proc.  Royal  Soc.  Lxxxi.  p.  310) 

e-^(-^)"-^"^  L  _  (n+im)(n-im) 

{n  +  ^m)  {n+hn  —  \)  {n - ^m)  {n-\m  —  1 )  _       \ 
+  -  ""        2  \7'  ■ "  j 

may  be  expressed  by  the  equation 

11.  Shew  that,  if  |  arg  z  \  <  Jtt,  and  |  arg  (1  +0  |  ^  tt, 

(Whittaker.) 

12.  Shew  that,  if  n  be  not  a  positive  integer  and  if  |  arg  z  \  <  Itt,  then 

and  that  this  result  holds  for  all  values  of  arg  z  if  the  integral  be  /         ,  the  contours 
enclosing  the  poles  of  T  {-t)  but  not  those  of  T  {^t- ^n). 

13.  Shew  that,  if  |  arg  a  \  <  ^tt, 

['"+'.(i-'^)-'.-A.(^)^^- 

J    00 

?r  a\n  -  m   iri  (m  -  h) 

= ~-~ ;,     ^^.F{-hi,hn  +  h;hn-hi  +  l;  1 -*«-'). 

r(-m)r(*m-i/i  +  l)a5('"+^) 

14.  Deduce  from  the  preceding  example  that 

f  "  e -  3^' z"  A.  + 1  (^)  dz  =  (v/2) -  1  - '»  r  (m  +  1)  sin  (^  -  ^m)  rr 
if  the  integral  converges.  (Watson.) 

15.  Shew  that,  if  ?i  be  a  positive  integer,  and  if 

^n{^v)  =  j^^J-^'Uz-.i-r'  D„{z)dz, 

then  En  (x)  =  ±  je^""'  V(27r)  r(n  +  l)c~  i'^'"  /)_ „ _ i  ( +  iv), 

the  upper  or  lower  signs  being  taken  according  as  tlic  imaginary  part  of  .u  is  positive 
or  negative.  (Watson.) 


348  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP,  XVI 

16.  Shew  that,  if  w  be  a  positive  integer, 

where  fj,  is  ^n  or  ^{n-  1),  whichever  is  an  integer,  and  the  cosine  or  sine  is  taken  as  n  is 
even  or  odd.  (Adamoflf.) 

17.  Shew  that,  if  n  be  a  positive  integer, 

J)n  (^)  =  ( -  r  (4^) '  *  Wnf  + 1  e^^'  (J,  +  J,-  J,), 

where  ^i  =  [  "    e  "  "  ('^  - 1)'  '^^'^  (a^v^n)  dv, 

J  -00  sin  \     "*    '      ' 

Jo=  I      (T  (ij)    .     (xvJn)  dv, 
Jo  sin  ^     ^    ^      ' 

fO  _„(j;_l)2C0S  , 

^^^  I  -^^  sin  (•^■^>^**)^^'' 

and  cr  (i')  =  e*"  (^  "  '^'^  ."  -  e  "  "  (^  '  l)'.  (Adamoff.) 

18.  With  the  notation  of  the  preceding  examples,  shew  that,  when  .r  is  real, 

1     _  1    _  4..T2  cos        , 
sm 

while  ./Jj  satisfies  both  the  inequalities 

Shew  also  that  as  v  increases  from  0  to  1,  a{v)  decreases  from  0  to  a  minimum  at 
v=l—/ti  and  then  increases  to  0  at  ??  =  1 ;  and  as  v  increases  from  1  to  co  ,  o-  (v)  increases  to 
a  maximum  at  1  +  /i2  and  then  decreases,  its  limit  being  zei'o ;  where 

2  \/(l)  <^^<  \/(Jn) '      I  x/(l)  <  ^^^  <  \/(2T.)  ' 
and  I  o-(l-/ii)  I  <  ^H~2^  o-(l+/<2)  <  An~^,  where  ^4  =-0742,...  (Adamoff.) 

19.  By  employing  the  second  mean  value  theorem  when  necessary,  shew  that 

D„  {.V)  =  ( -  r  ,/2 .  (V»)"  e  -  ^"  P^'-'  {.V  ^In)  +  ^1 , 
^  '  |_sin  V'^  J 

where  co„  (,i')  satisfies  both  the  inequalities 


,    ,  ,  3'35...      i-r-        ,         /^s  I         1-1 


(Adamoff.) 


20.     Shew  that,  if  n  be  positive  but  otherwise  unrestricted,  and  if  m  be  a  positive 
integer  (or  zero),  then  the  equation  in  z 

has  m  positive  roots  when  2m  —  1  <  n  <  2m  +  1.  (Milne.) 


CHAPTER  XVII 

BESSEL  FUNCTIONS 

17'1.     The  Bessel  coefficients. 

In  this  chapter  we  shall  consider  a  class  of  functions  known  as  Bessel 
functions  which  have  many  analogies  with  the  Legendre  functions  of 
Chapter  XV.  Just  as  the  Legendre  functions  proved  to  be  particular 
forms  of  the  hypergeometric  function  with  three  regular  singularities,  so 
the  Bessel  functions  are  particular  forms  of  the  confluent  hypergeometric 
function  with  one  regular  and  one  irregular  singularity.  As  in  the  case  of 
the  Legendre  functions,  we  first  introduce*  a  certain  set  of  the  Bessel  functions 
as  coefficients  in  an  expansion. 

For  all  values  of  z  and  ^  (^  =0  excepted),  the  function 


e 


can  be  expanded  by  Laurent's  theorem  in  a  series  of  positive  and  negative 
powers  of  t.  If  the  coefficient  of  P\  where  n  is  any  integer  positive  or 
negative,  be  denoted  by  /„  (z),  it  follows,  from  §  5*6,  that 


1       r(o+)  1    ^>z  [  a  — 

Ztti  J 
To  "express  Jn  {z)  as  a  power  series  in  z,  write  u  =  Itjz ;  then 

since  the  contour  is  any  one  which  encircles  the  origin  once  counter-clockwise, 
we  may  take  it  to  be  the  circle  j  ^  j  =  1  ;  as  the  integrand  can  be  expanded 
in  a  series  of  powers  of  z  uniformly  convergent  on  this  contour,  it  follows 
from  §  4-7  that 

1        "^^    (_)»•  /-^     \n+-ir  /-(O+l 


27ri^^o  r!    V^   /        J 

Now  the  residue  of  the  integrand  at  ^  =  0  is  {(n  +  r)]}~'^  by  §  6'1,  when 
n  +  r  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero ;  when  n  +  /•  is  a  negative  integer  the 
residue  is  zero. 

*  This  procedure  is  due  to  Scblomileh,  Zeitschrlft  filr  Mdtlt.  ii.  (1857). 


350  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Therefore,  if  w  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero, 

'^^^'^-  Z,r\{n  +  r)\ 

_    z^     { z" Z'' 

"  Wn\  X      2M  (w  +  1)      2*  A  .  2  (n  +  \){n  +  2) 
whereas,  when  w  is  a  negative  integer  equal  to  —  m, 

"^^      rZnr\{r-m)\       ,%     (m  +  sjlsl      ' 
and  so  J„  {z)  =  (-)'"  /,„  (z). 

The  function  Jn{z),  which  has  now  been  defined  for  all  integral  values 
of  w,  positive  and  negative,  is  called  the  Bessel  coeffi^cient  of  order  n;  the 
series  defining  it  converges  for  all  values  of  z. 

We  shall  see  later  (§  17 "2)  that  Bessel  coefficients  are  a  particular  case  of  a  class  of 
functions  known  as  Bessel  functions. 

■Bessel  coefficients  were  introduced  in  1824  by  Bessel  in  his  Untersuchung  des  Theils  der 
planetarischen  Stomngen  welcheraus  der  Bewegung  der  Sonne  entsteht  {Berlin.  Abk.  1824) ; 
special  cases  of  Bessel  coefficients  had,  however,  been  previously  considered  by  D.  Bernoulli 
in  1732,  and  by  Euler. 

In  reading  some  of  the  earlier  papers  on  the  subject,  it  should  be  remembered  that  the 
notation  has  changed,  what  was  formerly  written  ,/„  (z)  being  now  written  J,,  (22). 

,     Example  1.     Prove  that  if 

26(1  +  ^2)  _       .....  ... 

then  e"'  sin  hz  =  J 1  Jj  (0)  +  J .^2  (2)  +  ^ a«^3  (2)  +  •  •  ■  • 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 

[For,  if  the  contour  D  in  the  '«-plane  be  a  circle  with  centre  ?t=0  and  radius  large 
enough  to  include  the  zeros  of  the  denominator,  we  have 

the  series  on  the  right  converging  uniformly  on  the  contour  ;  and  so,  using  §  47  and 
replacing  the  integrals  by  Bessel  coefficients,  we  have 

2 


1    r    ie(«--)     ^^v^^'^W      ^      1    {    i4«--)/^,    A.    A,      \  , 

^r— .        e-   V      "/ ^ o??<  =  „--        e     ^      n/  I     1  +  -i  +  -j  +  ... )  du 

2m  J  D  /       2a       1  \2      4b'^  2,Tn  J  u  \u-       ?//       u'^         J 


1---    -     +     . 

=  A,Jy  (z)  +  A.rh  iz)  +  ^3-/-!  (2)  +  . . .  • 
In  the  integral  on  the  left  write  \i^u  —  u~'^)  —  a  =  t,  so  that  as  ti  describes  a  circle  of 
radius  e^,  t  describes  an  ellipse  with  semiaxcs  cosh  /3  and  sinh^  with  foci  at  —  a±?'  ;  then 
we  have 

the  contour  being  the  ellipse  just  specified,  which  contains  the  zeros  of  i"  +  b-.     Evaluating 
the  integral  by  §  6'1,  we  have  the  required  result.] 


17  11]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  351 

,  Example  2.     Shew  that,  when  n  is  an  integer, 

Jn{y  +  Z)=       2      J,niy)Jn-m{z)- 
TO  =  — 00 

(K.  Neumann  and  Schlafli.) 
[Consider  the  expansion  of  each  side  of  the  equation 

exp  \^{^^z)[t-  ^)|  =  exp  l^y  (t  -  J)|  .  exp  ^z[t-  J) j.] 

'  Example  3.     Shew  that 

giecos* ^  j^ ^^^ _l_ ^. ^^g ^  j^  ^^^ _|_ 2^-2  ^^^ 20^2  (2)  + ... • 

•  Example  A.     Shew  that  if  r2=a;"^+2'^ 

Jo  (r) = Jo  (^0  Ji>  (y)  -  2^2  (^)  J^  (y) + 2  J4('^^)  ^4  (y)  - . . .  • 

(K,  Neumann  and  Lommel.) 
17"11.     BesseVs  differential  equation. 

We  have  seen  that,  when  n  is  an  integer,  the  Bessel  coefficient  of  order  n 
is  given  by  the  formula 

From  this  formula  we  shall  now  shew  that  Jn{z)  is  a  solution  of  the 
linear  differential  equation 

dhi     Idy  ^        r^\ 

which  is  called  Bessel's  equation  for  functions  of  order  n. 

For  we  find  on  performing  the  differentiations  (§  4'2)  that 

d'Jnjz)        IdJnjz)        (  n^ 


A.'dt 


=  0, 

since  ^"'''"^  exp  (^  —  ^^/4^)  is  one- valued.     Thus  we  have  proved  that 

dz^  z      dz  \        z-J 

The   reader  will   observe   that   z=  0  is  a  regular  point  and  ^  =  oc    an 
irregular  point,  all  other  points  being  ordinary  points  of  this  equation. 

Example  1.     IJy  differentiating  the  expansion 

with  regard  to  -a  and  with  regard  to  t,  shew  tluit  the  Bessel  coefficients  satisfy  Bessel's 
equation.  (St  Jolin's,  1899.) 


352  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Example  2.     The  function  P„"'  ( 1  —  — g )  satisfies  the  equation  defined  by  the  scheme 

{4n'^      00  0  ^ 

^m     n  +  1         \in    z^  Y  ; 
—  \m      -n      —  Jm        J 

shew  that  t/„j  (z)  satisfies  the  confluent  forra»of  this  equation  obtained  by  making  n-^ao  . 

17*12.     The  connexion  between  Jn{z)  and   Wk,m  functions. 
The  reader  will  verify  without  difficulty  that,  if  in  Bessel's  equation  we 
write  y  =  z~^  V  and  then  write  z  =  a;/2i,  we  get 

d^v      f     1      }  —  7i^\     _  ^ 
dx'      V     4         .'/-    /' 

which  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  Wo,»n(^')j  i*  follows  that 

Jn  (z)  =  Az--M,,n{'^iz)  +  Bz  "  4ifo,_,,  (2t>). 

Comparing  the  coefficients  of  z^"-  on  each  side  we  see  that 

z-^ 

except  in  the  critical  cases  when  2n  is  a  negative  integer;  when  n  is  half  of 
a  negative  odd  integer,  the  result  follows  from  Rummer's  second  formula 
(§  16-11). 

17"2.  The  solution  of  Bessel's  equation  luhen  n  is  not  necessarily  an 
integer. 

We  now  proceed,  after  the  manner  of  §  15'2,  to  extend  the  definition  of 
Jniz)  to  the  case  when  n  is  any  number,  real  or  complex.  It  appears  by 
methods  similar  to  those  of  §  17"11  that,  for  all  values  of  n,  the  equation 

d-xj      1  dy      /'        n~\     _ 
dz-     z  dz      \        Z'j 

is  satisfied  by  an  integral  of  the  form 

y  =  z''  I     r«-i  exp  U  -  ^)\  dt 

provided  that  t~^''~^  exp  (t  —  z"/4<t)  resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing  G 
and  that  differentiations  under  the  sign  of  integration  are  justified. 

Accordingly,  we  define  Jn  (z)  by  the  equation 

the  expression  being  rendered  precise  by  giving  arg  z  its  principal  value  and 
taking  |  arg  ^  |  "$  tt  on  the  contour. 


1712-17-21]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  •  353 

To  express  this  integral  as  a  power  series,  we  observe  that  it  is  an 
analytic  function  of  z ;  and  we  may  obtain  the  coefficients  in  the  Taylor's 
series  in  powers  of  z  by  differentiating  under  the  sign  of  integration  (§§  5'32 
and  4*44).     Hence  we  deduce  that 

^    |;    (-)r^n+2r 

~ r^o 2»+^!  r(7z-hr+l) ' 
by  §  12'22.     This  is  the  expansion  in  question. 

Accordingly ,  for  general  values  of  n,  we  define  the  Bessel  function  Jn{z) 
by  the  equations 

~  ,.ro 2'*+'-^''r!r(n  +  r  +  l) * 

This  function  reduces  to  a  Bessel  coefficient  when  n  is  an  integer;  it  is 
sometimes  called  a  Bessel  function  of  the  first  kind. 

The  reader  will  observe  that  since  Bessel's  equation  is  unaltered  by 
writing  —  n  for  n,  fundamental  solutions  are  Jn  (z),  J_^  (z),  except  when 
n  is  an  integer,  in  which  case  the  solutions  are  not  independent.  With  this 
exception  the  general  solution  of  Bessel's  equation  is 

where  a  and  y8  a7'e  arbitrary  constants. 

A  second  solution  of  Bessel's  equation  when  n  is  an  integer  will  be  given 
later  (§  17-6). 

17'21.     The  recurrence  formulae  for  the  Bessel  functions. 

As  the  Bessel  function  satisfies  a  confluent  form  of  the  hypergeometric 
equation,  it  is  to  be  expected  that  recurrence  formulae  will  exist,  corresponding 
to  the  relations  between  contiguous  hypergeometric  functions  indicated  in 
§  14-7. 

To  establish  these  relations  for  general  values  of  n,  real  or  complex,  we 
have  recourse  to  the  result  of  §  17*2.     On  writing  the  equation 

r(o+)  fj  (  /         ^2\) 

0=  _.  sF^"?  '-s)f* 


i        .IJ. 11  — O  ..J « 1      1 I      J.  " 


at  length,  we  have 

0=1       U-''  +  ^  zH-'^--  -  nt-""-'  ]exY>it-^]dt 

=  2r:i  \(2z-^T-'  Jn-l  (2)  +  \z'  {2z-'T+' Jn+,  {z)  "  'n(2^~')"-^  (^) 

In 

and  so  Jn-i{z)  +  Jn+-i{z)=— Jn{z)    (A). 

z 

w.  M.  A.  23 


354  .  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Next  we  have,  by  §  4*44, 
.        ,      ■    i  [-'Jn  (.))  =  2„-i„.  i\[*^  t-'-^  exp  {t  -  Q  dt  . 

=  —  Z      Jn+1  \Z), 

and  consequently,  if  dashes  denote  differentiations  with  regard  to  z, 

J^{z)='^^Jn{z)-Jn^,{z) (B). 

From  (A)  and  (B)  it  is  easy  to  derive  the  other  recurrence  formulae 

Jn{z)=\[Jn-r{z)-Jn^,{z)]      (C), 

and  Jn  {z)  =  Jn-i{z)  -  -  Jn{z) (D). 

Example  1.     Obtain  these  results  from  the  power  series  for  Jn  (z). 

Example  2.     Shew  that  ^  [z'^Jn  'z)}  =  2"  Jn  _  i  (2). 

ciz 

Example  3.     Shew  that  i/q'  (2)  =  —J\  {z)- 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

16J„i^  {z)=Jn-i  (2)  -  4J„_2  (2)  +  6Jn  {z)-Un  +  i{z)  +Jn^i{z). 

Example  5.     Shew  that 

J,{z)-J,{z)  =  iJ^'{z). 
Example  6.     Shew  that 

J,{z)=J^'{z)-z-W^{z). 

17*211.  Relation  between  two  Bessel  functions  whose  orders  differ  by 
an  integer. 

From  the  last  article  can  be  deduced  an  equation  connecting  any  two 
Bessel  functions  whose  orders  differ  by  an  integer,  namely 

Z-^'-^Jn+r  (Z)  =  i-r  -^^y  [z-^'Ju  {Z)], 

where  n  is  unrestricted  and  r  is  any  positive  integer.     This  result  follows  at 
once  by  induction  from  formula  (B),  when  it  is  written  in  the  form 

Z-^-^J,,^,{z)  =  -^^{z-^^Jn{z)]. 

17'22.     The  zeros  of  Bessel  functions  tuhoae  order  n  is  real. 

The  relations  of  §  17"21  enable  us  to  deduce  the  interesting  theorem  that 
betiveen  any  two  consecutive  real  zeros  of  z~^''Jn  (z),  tliere  lies  one  and  only  one 
zero*  of  z~"Jn+i{z). 

*  Proofs  of  this  theorem  have  been  given  by  Bocher,  Dull,  American  Math.  Soe.  iv.  (1897), 
p.  206;  Gegenbauer,  Monatshefte  fur  Math.  viii.  (1897);  and  Porter,  Ball.  American  Math. 
Soc.  IV.  (1898),  p.  274. 


17-21 1-17-23]  BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  S5S 

;      For,  from  relation  (B)  when  written  in  the  form 

it  follows  from  RoUe's  theorem*  that  between  each  consecutive  pair  of  zeros 
of  2~^Jn  (•2')  there  is  at  least  one  zero  of  z~^^Jn+i  (z). 

Similarly,  from  relation  (D)  when  written  in  the  form 

it  follows  that  between  each  consecutive  pair  of  zeros  of  z^'''^^Jn+i(z)  there  is 
at  least  one  zero  of  2"''"^J„(^). 

Further  z~^Jn(z)  and  -j-  [z~^Jn(z)]  have  no  common  zeros;  for  the 
former  function  satisfies  the  equation 

and  it  is  easily  verified  by  induction  on  differentiating  this  equation  that  if 

both  y  and  -j-  vanish  for  any  value  of  z,  all  differential  coefficients  of  y  vanish, 

and  y  is  zero  by  §  5-4. 

The  theorem  required  is  now  obvious  except  for  the  numerically  smallest 
zeros  ±  ^  of  z~''^Jn  (z),  since  (except  for  z  =  0),  z~^^Jn  (z)  and  ^^"'"^  Jn  i^)  have  the 
same  zeros.  But  z=0  is  a  zero  of  z~^KTn+i (z),  and  if  there  were  any  other 
positive  zero  of  z~^Jn+i(z),  say  ^j,  which  was  less  than  f,  then  z'^'^^Jn(z) 
would  have  a  zero  between  0  and  ^i,  which  contradicts  the  hypothesis  that 
there  were  no  zeros  of  2;"+^  J„  (z)  between  0  and  ^. 

The  theorem  is  therefore  proved. 
[See  also  §  17'3  examples  3  and  4,  and  example  19  at  the  end  of  the  chapter.] 

17-23.     Bessel's  integral  for  the  Bessel  coefficients. 

We  shall  next  obtain  an  integral  first  given  by  Bessel  in  the  particular 
case  of  the  Bessel  functions  for  which  n  is  a  positive  integer ;  in  some  respects 
the  result  resembles  Laplace's  integrals  given  in  §  15-23  and  §  15-33  for  the 
Legendre  functions. 

In  the  integral  of  §  17'1,  viz. 

J^(^z)  =  J-A        u—^e     V      ^^J  du, 

ZTTIJ 

take  the  contour  to  be  the  circle  |  w  |  =  1  and  write  u  =  e*^,  so  that 

ZirJ  -„ 

*  This  is  proved  in  Burnside  and  Panton's  Theory  of  Equations  (i.  p.  157)  for  polynomials. 
It  may  be  deduced  for  any  functions  with  continuous  differential  coefficients  by  using  the  First 
Mean  Value  Theorem  (§  4-14). 

23— -2 


356  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Bisect  the  range  of  integration  and  in  the  former  part  write  —  ^  for  ^ ; 

we  get 

27rJo  27rJo 

and  so  /„  (•2)  =  —      cos  (nO  -  z  sin  6)  dO, 

which  is  the  formula  in  question. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  when  z  is  real  and  n  is  an  integer, 

\Jn{z)  1^1. 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  for  all  values  of  n  (real  or  complex),  the  integral 

1    [" 
y=-   I     cos  («^  —  s  sin  ^)  c?^ 

satisfies 

cPy      1  dy  ^(^     7^\^  ^_&vsxni!  (\      n 

dz^      z  dz 


which  reduces  to  Bessel's  equation  when  n  is  an  integer. 

[It  is  easy  to  shew,  by  differentiating  under  the  integral  sign,  that  the  expression 
on  the  left  is  equal  to 


1    {'"  d   {(n      cos  6 
75  H : 


0  d6  \\z 


sin  (nd  -  z  sin  6)  \  dB.'\ 


17'231.     The  modification  of  Bessel's  integral  when  n  is  not  an  integer. 
We  shall  now  shew  that*,  for  general  values  of  n, 

J^  (^)  =  1  r  cos  {nd  -  z  sin  0)  dO  -  ^^°^  f "  e-ne-^smhe  ^^  ^  _  /^x 

when  R{z)>0.     This  obviously  reduces  to  the  result  of  §  17*23  when  n  is 
an  integer. 

Taking  the  integral  of  §  17"2,  viz. 

M  /■(0+)  /  ^2\ 

and  supposing  that  z  is  positive,  we  have,  on  writing  t  =  ^uz, 

1    r(<'+)  [i     I        In) 

But,  if  the  contour  be  taken  to  be  that  of  the  figure  consisting  of  the  real 
axis  from  —  1  to  —  go  taken  twice  and  the  circle  j  m  |  =  1,  this  integral  re- 
presents an  analytic  function  of  z  when  R  {zu)  is  negative  as  |  w  |  -»-  00  on  the 

path,  i.e.  when  |  arg z\<^7r;  and  so,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation, 

the  formula  (which  has  been  proved  by  a  direct  transformation  for  positive 
values  of  z)  is  true  whenever  R  (z)  >  0, 

*  This  result  is  due  to  Schlafli,  Math,  Ann.  iii. 


17*231]  BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  367 

Hence 

•^-  (^) = h  in + //  /','} """""  ^"p  K"  -  5)}  ''«• 

where  0  denotes  the  circle   |  w  |  =  1,  and  arg  u-=  —  it  on   the  first  path  of 
integration  while  arg  u  =  +  tt  on  the  third  path. 


—  00  —1 


Writing  u  =  te^^  in  the  first  and  third  integrals  respectively  (so  that  in 
each  case  arg  t  =  0),  and  u  =  e^'*  in  the  second,  we  have 

Modifying  the  former  of  these  integrals  as  in  §17*23  and  writing  e^  for  t 
in  the  latter,  we  have  at  once 

J^  (^)  =  1  r  cos  {nd  -  z  sin  6)  dO  +  ^"L(^i±l)5  ["  g-no-zsinhe  ^q^ 
which  is  the  required  result,  when  ) arg z\<-'Tr. 

When  I  arg  2  |  lies  between  \nr  and  tt,  since  Jn  {z)  =  e^'^'^^Jn{  —  z),  we  have 

±nni    f   r„                                                              /•<"                                  ] 
J„(2)  =  !__J|     cos(ri^+0sin^)rf^-sinw7r  /     e-***+^^'"^^(f^l (B), 

the  upper  or  lower  sign  being  taken  as  arg  0  >  ^tt  or  <  -  ^tt. 

When  n  is  an  integer  (A)  reduces  at  once  to  Bessel's  integral,  and  (B)  does  so  when  we 
make  use  of  the  reduction  J„  (z)  =  ( — )»  J_n  (2)  which  is  true  for  integer  values  of  71. 

Equation  (A)  is  due  to  Schlafli,  Math.  Ann.  m.  (1871),  and  equation  (B)  was  given  by 
Sonine,  Math.  Ann.  xvi.  (1880). 

These  trigonometric  integrals  for  the  Bessel  functions  may  be  regarded  as  corresponding 
to  Laplace's  integrals  for  the  Legendre  functions.  For  (§  17*11  example  2)  ./,„(2)  satisfies 
the  confluent  form  (obtained  by  making  ?i-^oo  )  of  the  equation  for  P^"*  (1  -  z^j^n^). 

But  Laplace's  integral  for  this  function  is  a  multiple  of 

=  \     jl+  — cos  ^  +  0  (?4~2)|-  COS m(f)  d(f). 

The  limit  of  the  integrand  as  to-»x  is  e*^°°^*  cos  ?«(/>,  which  exhibits  the  similarity  of 
Laplace's  integral  for  P„"*  (2)  to  the  Bessel-Schlafli  integral  for  t7'„,  (2). 


358  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Example  1.     From  the  formula  J'o  (^)  =  ^r-  /       e~^'^'^°^^  d(f),  by  a  change  of  order  of 

•^TT  J    — TT 

integration,  shew  that,  when  %  is  a  positive  integer  and  cos  ^  >0,— 
i'„  (cos  ^)  =  — .--^  -   ,  I    e-''''''^^J^{xiim6)x-^dx.    (Callandreau.) 
r(n  +  l}jo 

Example  2,     Shew  that,  with  Ferrers'  definition  of  P^™  (cos  6\ 

■ '      PrT  (cos  6)  =  ^      _^^^_^^.  /" "  e-*°°««  J^  {x  sin  6)  x^dx 
when  n  and  m  are  positive  integers  and  cos  ^>  0.  (Hobson.) 

Yl'^^.     Bessel  functions  whose  order  is  half  an  odd  integer. 

We  have  seen  (§  17*2)  that  when  the  order  n  of  a  Bessel  function  Jn{z) 
is  half  an  odd  integer,  the  difference  of  the  roots  of  the  indicial  equation  at 
2^  =  0  is  In,  which  is  an  integer.  We  now  shew  that,  in  such  cases,  Jn  {z)  is 
expressible  in  terms  of  elementary  functions. 

^  r   /  N     2*2*  L        ^^  z"  ]      /  2  \*  . 

i^ or        J i(z)=  — J-  \  1  —  w—F^  +  r^— s — 'a — P  —  •••?•=    —     sm  z, 
^^  '       ttM        2.3      2.3.4.5  J      \Trzj 

and  therefore  (§  17 '2 11)  if  A;  is  a  positive  integer 

(-)^  (2^)^+4     d^     /sin^N 

On  differentiating  out  the  expression  on  the  right,  we  obtain  the  result  that 

Jn  +  i  {z)  =  Pk  sin  z  +  Q^  cos  z, 
where  P;;.,  Q;;.  are  polynomials  in  s~ 2. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  J_  j  (2)  =  f  —  j    cos  z. 

Example  2.     Prove  by  induction  that  if  k  be  an  integer  and  n  =  k  +  ^,  then 

/2\ir       ,       ,  ^    .{.  (-)''(4n2-l2)(4?i2^.32)...{4n^-(4?'-l)2}l 

•^"^^)=y  r'^'~*""~^'^M''".!i    — (2-^)12^;^^^^ — - — ^7 

.      ,  ,  ,     ,  (-)'-(4w2-l2)(4^2_32),_     I4^2_(4^_3X2}-| 

+  sm  {z-hnn-k^)   2^^^ (2^- 1)  !  20^-3^1- 1      ^J' 

the   summations  being  continued   as  far  as  the  terms   with   the   vanishing   factors   in 
the  numerators. 

Example   3.     Shew  that   z^+h  -j-t^ic  ( )    ^^   ^   solution   of    Bessel's  equation   for 

^2»n  +  l  y 

Example  4.     Shew  that  the  solution  of  2'""^*    ,  2m +  1+^"*^  ^^ 


2m 
P 

where  Cqj  Ci,  •••  C2„i  are  arbitrary  and  oo,  ai, ...  a2,rt  are  the  roots  of 


(Lommel.) 


17-24,    17-3]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  -  359' 

17'3.     Hankel's  contour  integral*  for  Jn{z)' 
Consider  the  integral 

2/  =  ^«  {f'-lf-^QOB{zt)dt, 

J  A 

where  -4  is  a  point  on  the  right  of  the  point  t  =  l,  and 

arg(<-l)  =  arg(«+l)  =  0 

at  A  ;  the  contour  may  conveniently  be  regarded  as  being  in  the  shape  of 
a  figure  of  eight. 

We  shall  shew  that  this  integral  is  a  constant  multiple  of  Jn(z).  It  is 
easily  seen  that  the  integrand  returns  to  its  initial  value  after  t  has  described 
the  path  of  integration;  for  (^  —  1)"  ~  ^  is  multiplied  by  the  factor  e(2»-i)«  after 
the  circuit  (1+)  has  been  described,  and  (^+1)""^  is  multiplied  by  the 
factor  e"<2"~i^"  after  the  circuit  (— 1  -)  has  been  described. 

converges  uniformly  on  the  contour,  we  have  (§  4*7) 

^      io     (2r)!     .L  *    ^*       ^^        '^^- 

To  evaluate  these  integrals,  we  observe  firstly  that  they  are   analytic 

functions  of  n  for  all  values  of  n,  and  secondly  that,  when  ii  ( ri  +  2]  >0,  we 

may  deform  the  contour  into  the  circles  \t—  1\  =  8,  \t  +  1\  =  8  and  the  real 
axis  joining  the  points  t=  ±(1  —  B)  taken  twice,  and  then  we  may  make 
S  -*  0 ;  the  integrals  round  the  circles  tend  to  zero  and,  assigning  to  t—1 
and  ^  +  1  their  appropriate  arguments  on  the  modified  path  of  integration, 
we  get,  if  arg  (1  —  i^)  =  0  and  t-  =  u, 

t'^(t'-lf-^dt 

J  A 

=  Q(n  - 1)  ni  r  "^  ^^r  ^  _  ^,)n  -lat  +  e-  ("  -  ^)  '^^  f    t^''  (1  -  t^f  -^dt 

=  -  4t  sin  (n  -l^-^i    ^^'-  ( 1  -  t^T  ~  ^  dt 

=  -  2i  sin  (n  -^tt      u''  "  *  (1  -  wf  '^du 

=  2t-8in  (n  +  ^)  TT  r  (r  +  .^)  T  (n  +  -^Iv  {n  +  r  +  1). 


*  Math.  Ami.  i. 


360  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Since  the  initial  and  final  expressions  are  analytic  functions  of  n  for  all 
values  of  n,  it  follows  from  §  5*5  that  this  equation,  proved  when 

ij(.  +  l)>0, 
is  true  for  all  values  of  n. 
Accordingly 

y     r=o  (2r)!r(n  +  r  +  l) 

=  2-+H-  sin  (n  +  |)  irV  [n  +  ^)  V  (^j  /„  (z), 
on  reduction. 

Accordingly,  when  "1  ^  [ 5  —  w  j  i     ^0,we  have 

'^n  (-)  =  2-^1-  r  (1)  i^  («^  -  1  r  -  *  COS  {zt)  dt. 

Corollary.     When  i?(?i  +  |)>0,  we  may  deform  the  path  of  integration,  and  obtain 
the  result 

•'•<^)'2.r(,.+\)r(i)/',('-'')"'''°''(-'>'" 
°  2—  r  (r+i)  r  (i)  /o  "'"'• '» '"^  <^  ""^  '^)  '''^- 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  when  /^  (%  +  J)  >  0, 

Example  2.     Obtain  the  result 

'^"  ^'^ "  2-T{n+^)r{l)  J  I  ''''^  ^'  ''''^  *^^  ^''''"  "^  '^'^' 
when  R{n)>0,  by  expanding  in  powers  of  2  and  integrating  (§  4-7)  term-by-term. 

Example  3.     Shew  that  when  -  i  <  7i  <  ^,  J'„  (2)  has  an  infinite  number  of  real  zeros. 
[Let  z  =  {m  +  i)  IT  where  m  is  zero  or  a  positive  integer  ;  then  by  the  corollary  above 

Jn  {mtt -h ^tt)  =  2»-ir(?!+.^)r(.^)  ^2"" - ''^i  +  ^2 -  . . .  +  ( - )™  u,n}, 

2r+l 

where  m^=     rj"^^^  (1  _  f-y'  -  ^  cos  {{m  +  ^)  nt}  dt  I 

ri/(w+A)  f        /        2r-  lV]n-i 

=  jo  {'-(^  +  2^+1)}        «iM(-  +  i)-^}^^, 

so,  since  n-^<0,  u,n>u,n-i>  itm-2> •-,  and  hence  Jn{mn  +  \n)  has  the  sign  of  (-)'». 
This  method  of  proof  for  n  =  0  is  due  to  Bessel] 

Example  4.     Shew  that  if  11  be  real,  J.^  (z)  has  an  infinite  number  of  real  zeros  ;  and 
find  an  upper  limit  to  the  numerically  smallest  of  them. 

[Use  example  3  combined  with  §  17  "22.] 


17'4,  17-5]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  361 

17'4.     Connexion  between  Bessel  coefficients  and  Legendre  functions. 

We  shall  now  establish  a  result  due  to  Heine*  which  renders  precise  the  statement  of 
§  17*11  example  2,  concerning  the  expression  of  Bessel  coefficients  as  limiting  forms  of 
hypergeomotric  functions. 

When  I  arg(l+2)|  <  tt,  «  is  unrestricted  and  m  is  a  positive  integer,  it  follows  by 
differentiating  the  formula  of  §  15-22  that,  with  Ferrers'  definition  of  Pn^{z), 

^""(^^  =  2'».I^r"^r-"^m+l)(^-^^^"^^+^)^"-^(-^  +  "^'  «  +  l  +  m;  m  +  \;\-^z\ 
and  so,  if  |  arg  2  |  <  ^tt,  |  arg  (1  -  Iz^jn^)  \  <7r,  we  have 

7Jm/i  2^\        r(»  +  m+l)2"'W-™/,         22\*"'        ,  ,  ,        ,    o        OS 

Now  make  «-*  +qo  {n  being  positive,  but  not  necessarily  integral),  so  that,  if  d  =  «~S 
5-»0  continuously  through  positive  values. 

Then  —- f- ».  1,  by  S  13-6,  and  [l--r'»]     ^1. 


Further,  the  (r  +  l)th  term  of  the  hypergeometric  series  is 

(-0^- mS)  (1  +  8+mS+rS){l-(TO  + 1)2  S2}  {1  -  (m+2)2  S2} ...  {1  -  (»i+7-)2 . 


{¥r; 


(m  +  l)(m  +  2)  ...  (m  +  r).  /•  ! 

this  is  a  continuous  function  of  S  and  the  series  of  which  this  is  the  (r  +  l)th  term  is 
easily  seen  to  converge  uniformly  in  a  range  of  values  of  S  including  the  point  S  =  0;  so, 
by  §  3*32,  we  have 

limL-P-A--^^l=     ^"        g  {-YikzY 

w^ocL  \       2WJ     2»'.m!,.=o(»i  +  l)(m  +  2)  ...(m+r)r! 

=  ^41  (4 
which  is  the  relation  required. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  t 


lim  r«-»'P„»"{cos-)    =./,n(2). 


Example  2.     Shew   that   Bessel's   equation  is  the  confluent   form  of  the  equations 
defined  by  the  schemes 

n       ic     \-\-ic  z\,     ei'p\   n         \  0        2I,     pj    ^/i         \{c-n)      0     s^l 

-n    —ic  ^  —  ic     J  I  -  ^*   f  —  2ic   2ic-l     J  f.  -  ^Ji   —  |(c  +  n)  ?i  + 1     j 

the  confluence  being  obtained  by  making  c  -*•  qo  . 

17"5.     Asymptotic  series  for  J^  (z)  when  \z\  is  large. 
We  have  seen  (§  17-12)  that 

1  •  3 

where  it  is  supposed  that  ;  arg  z   <  ir,  —  ^  tt  <  arg  {'2iz)  <  -^tt. 

*  The  apparently  different  result  given  in  Heine's  Kugelfunktionen  is  due  to  the  difference 
between  Heine's  associated  Legendre  function  and  Ferrers'  function. 

t  The  special  case  of  this  when  7/1  =  0  was  given  by  Mehler,  Crelle,  lxviii. 


362  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

But  for  this  range  of  values  of  z 

by  §  16'41  example  2,  if  —  ^ tt  <  arg (—  liz)  <  ^ir;  and  so,  when  | arg z\<ir, 

{Iirzy- 

But,  for  the  values  of  z  under  consideration,  the  asymptotic  expansion  of 
Tfo,«(±2i>)  is 

^      t    -        8i>  2!(8i>f  *•••  - 

■^  vv^izf  "^^^^  ^r 

and  therefore,  combining  the  series,  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  /„  {z),  when 
I  2;  I  is  large  and  |  arg  £;  |  <  tt,  is 


Jn{z)'-[^^ 


cos  I  ■2  —  o  ^''""  ~  4  *"" 


1  I    \   %,  i-y  14n2  -  12]  {4'/i2  -  3-1  . . .  {^n'  -  (4r  -  S)^ 


2  4 


r=l 


(2r-l)!2«'-='/'''-i 


cos  b  -  ^  ?i7r  -  ^  TT  j  .  f7n  (^)  -  siu  (z  -  ^nTT-^Trj.  Vn  (z) 


/2  ^i 
\'7rz/ 

where  Un  (z),  —  Vn  {z)  have  been  written  in  place  of  the  series. 

The  reader  will  observe  that  if  n  is  half  an  odd  integer  these  series 
terminate  and  give  the  result  of  §  17"24  example  2. 

Even  when  z  is  not  very  large,  the  value  of  J,^  {z)  can  be  computed  with  great  accuracy 
from  this  formula.  Thus,  for  all  positive  values  of  z  greater  than  8,  the  first  three  terms 
of  this  asymptotic  expansion  give  the  value  of  i/q  {z)  and  «/,  (2)  to  six  places  of  decimals. 

This  asymptotic  expansion  was  given  by  Poisson*  (for  n  =  0)  and  by  Jacobit  (for 
general  integral  values  of  n)  for  real  values  of  z.  Complex  values  of  z  were  considered  by 
Hankel+  and  several  subsequent  writers.  The  method  of  obtaining  the  expansion  here 
given  is  due  to  Barnes  §. 

Asymptotic  expansions  for  J^  {z)  when  the  order  n  is  large  have  been  given  by  Debye 
{Math.  Ann.  Lxvii.  pp.  bZb-bbS,  Milnchen.  Sitzungsberichte,  xh.  1910,  Abh.  5)  and  Nicholson 
{Phil.  Mag.  1907). 

*  Journal  de  VEc.  Folytechnique  (1),  cah.  19  (1823). 

t  Astron.  Nach.  xxviii.  p.  94. 

+  J\I(Uh.  Ann.  i.  p.  467. 

§  Trans.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.  xx.  p.  274. 


17*6]  BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  363 

Example  1.     By  suitably  modifying  Hankel's  contour  integral  (§  17-3),  shew  that,  when 

r(n  +  i)(2,r2)*L  yo  \       2?y 

and  deduce  the  asymptotic  expansion  of  t/„  {z)  when  |  2  |  is  large  and  |  arg  z  \  <  ^ir. 

[Take  the  contour  to  be  the  rectangle  whose  corners  are  ±1,  ±l  +  tiV,  the  rectangle 
being  indented  at  ±1,  and  make  JV-*-qo  ;   the  integrand  being  (1  — «2)«-J  e«/] 

Example  2.     Shew  that,  when  |  arg  2  |  <  ^tt  and  R{n+^)>0, 

'^n  (2)  =  ^r^\^"  ■  I ^^  e-^'°'*  cos'*-*  (p  cosec2«  + 1  0  sin  {2  -  (?i - ^)  c^}  (^(^ 

[Write  ?i  =  22cot  0  in  the  preceding  example.] 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  if  |  arg  2  |  <  ^n-  and  R{n  +  ^)>0,  then 

^e*'^2''  f  "  i;'»-i  ( 1  +  ivf-^  e--'''  dv  +  ^e"^^  2"  /" "  i''*"*  (1  -  ivf'^  e"'""  cfv 
is  a  solution  of  Bessel's  equation. 

Further,  determine  A  and  B  so  that  this  may  represent  t/„  (2). 

(Schafheitlin,  Cre^^e,  cxiv.) 

17*6.     The  second  solution  of  BesseVs  equation  when  the  order  is  an  integer. 

We  have  seen  in  §  17'2  that  when  the  order  n  of  Bessel's  differential 
equation  is  not  an  integer,  the  general  solution  of  the  equation  is 

aJn  {z)  +  ^J-n  {z), 

where  a  and  /3  are  arbitrary  constants. 

When,  however,  n  is  an  integer,  we  have  seen  that 

Jn{z)  =  {-YJ^n{z),- 

and  consequently  the  two  solutions  /„  {z)  and  JL^  {z)  are  not  really  distinct. 
We  therefore  require  in  this  case  to  find  another  particular  solution  of  the 
differential  equation,  distinct  from  J^  {z),  in  order  to  have  the  general 
solution. 

We  shall  now  consider  the  function 

^  sin  znir 

which  is  a  solution  of  Bessel's  equation  when  2n  is  not  an  integer.  The 
introduction  of  this  function   F„  {z)  is  due  to  Hankel*. 

*  Math.  Ann.  i.  p.  472. 


364  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

When  n  is  an  integer,  F^  is  defined  by  the  limiting  form  of  this  equation, 
namely 

F. (z)  =  lim  2,r6(«-^0 ^^  Jn^Az)ooB{n^-Ve^)-J-n-.{z) 
e^o  sm  2  (n  +  e)  TT 

=  lim  4^  (/.+,  {z) .  i-Y  -  J_._.  (.)} 

e^-O  Sin  ZCTT 

=  lim  e-^  { /„+,  (^)  -  (-)«  J-.n-e  (^)}. 

To  express  F„  (2^)  in  terms  of  Wk,  m  functions,  we  have  recourse  to  the 
result  of  §  17 '5,  which  gives 

F„(^)  =  lim    '"' 


o(27r^^)2 

remembering  that  W]c^m=  Wjc^^m- 

Hence,  since*  lim  TFo,„+e(2i2')  =  Tfo,„(2i>),  we  have 

This  function  (w  being  an  integer)  is  obviously  a  solution  of  Bessel's 
equation ;  it  is  called  a  Bessel  function  of  the  second  kind. 

The  asymptotic  expansion  for  Yn{z),  corresponding  to  that  of  §  17'5  for 
Jn  {z),  is  that,  when  |  arg  2  j  <  tt  and  n  is  an  integer, 
o    \  i  r 
Yn  (2)  '^  i^-jj      sin  [z  -'^nTT-^Trj.  Un  (z)  +  COS  U  -I  nir  -  j  tt  j  .  V,,  {z) 

where  Un{z)  and  Vn{z)  are  the  asymptotic  expansions  defined  in  §17*5,  their 
leading  terms  being  1  and  (471^  -  l)/8^  respectively. 

Example  1.     Prove  that 

where  n  is  made  an  integer  after  diflferentiation.  (Hankeh) 

Example  2.     Shew  that  if    Yn{z)  be  defined  by  the  equation  of  example  1,  it  is  a 
sokition  of  Bessel's  equation  when  11  is  an  integer. 

17"61.     The  ascending  series  for  F„  (z). 

The  series  of  §  17"6  is  convenient  for  calculating  Yn{z)  when  |^|  is  large. 
To  obtain  a  convenient  series  for  small  values  of  l^j,  we  observe  that,  since 
the  ascending  series  for  J±(«+e)  (^)  are  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic 
functions -f-  of  e,  each  term  may  be  expanded  in  powers  of  e  and  this  double 
series  may  then  be  rearranged  in  powers  of  e  (§§  5"3,  5"4). 

*  This  is  most  easily  seen  from  the   uniformity  of  the  convergence  with  regard  to  e  of 
Barnes'  contour  integral  (§  16-4)  for  W^^  ^,^(2iz). 
f  The  proof  of  this  is  left  to  the  reader. 


17'61]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  365 

Accordingly,  to  obtain  F„  (z),  we  have  to  sum  the  coefficients  of  the  first 
power  of  6  in  the  terms  of  the  series 


.=o^!r(n  +  e  +  r4-l)     ^    ^  ^^„  r!r(-w-6  +  r  +  1)' 

Now,  if  s  be  a  positive  integer  or  zero  and  t  a  negative  integer,  the 
following  expansions  in  powers  of  e  are  valid : 


(a-^y  '^"^  =  (^^)"^"" |l  +  6  log  (^^)  +  ...| , 


|l-6(-7+  S  m-M  + 


where  7  is  Euler's  constant  (§  12-1). 

Accordingly,  picking  out  the  coefficient  of  e,  we  see  that 

+  (_)n  s  ^  ^  ^^7 —  (-x-n+i  r (/I - r), 

and  so 

'*^i(^^)-«+«"(n-r-l)! 

When  n  is  an  integer,  fundamental  solutions  of  Bessel's  equations,  regular 
near  z  =  ^,  are  /„  {z)  and   F„  (2'). 

Karl  Neumann*  takes  as  the  second  solution  the  function  F'"''(^)  defined 
by  the  equation 

F<«)  {z)  =  \  F,  (^)  +  Jn  {z) .  (log  2  -  7) ; 
but  Hankel's  function  is  more  useful  for  physical  applications. 
*  Theorie  der  BesseVxchen  Funktionen  (Leipzig,  1867),  p.  41. 


366  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Example  1.     Shew  that  the  function  Yn{z)  satisfies  the  recurrence  formulae 

Y,:{z)  =  \{Yn.,{z)-Yn^M]- 

Shew  also  that  Neumann's  function  F(")  {z)  satisfies  the  same  recurrence  formulae. 
[These  are  the  same  as  the  recurrence  formulae  satisfied  by  Jn  (2).] 
Example  2.     Shew  that,  when  |  arg  z  \  <  ^tt, 

Yn  (z)  =  f" sin  (z  sin  e-ne)dd-  T  g-^^'-^^  {e'^e  _  ( _ )«  g-^^}  dd. 

(Schlafli.) 
Example  3.     Shew  that 

r(0)(2)=Jo(2)log2  +  2{J2(2)-K(^)  +  i«>^6(2)-...}. 

17'7.     Bessel  functions  with  jmrely  imaginary  argumenf^ . 
The  function 

is  of  ^frequent  occurrence  in  various  branches  of  applied  mathematics ;   in 
these  applications  z  is  usually  positive. 

The  reader  should  have  no  difficulty  in  obtaining  the  following  formulae : 

In 

(i)        In-i  {z)  -  In+i  (2)  =  --  In  (z)- 
(ii)       ^^[zHn{z)]=Z-I,,_,(z). 

(iii)     ^-[z-In{z)]=z-I,,^,{z). 

(^^)     dz^-'^-z^:z  -ii  +  ^j^'^(^)=«- 

(v)      When  R  (n  +  ^)  >  0, 

(vi)     When    —  ^tt  <  arg  2^  <  ^  tt,    the    asymptotic    expansion    of 

In{z)    is 

"^       »        .,  {471^  -  1^1  {4n^  -  3^1  . . .  1471-''  -  (2r  -  If]! 


In  (z)  'w 


e-(n  +  l)^ig-z 

{•Iirz)^ 


I   {4/2^  - 1-}  {4n'  -  3^1 . . .  {4n-  -  {2r  -  1)-}' 


the  second  series  being  negligible  when  jarg2^|<-7r.     The  result  is  easily 
*  This  notation  was  introduced  by  Basset,  Proc.  Carnh.  Phil.  Soc.  vi. 


17 -7-1 7 -8]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  367 

seen  to  be  valid  over  the  extended  range  —  ^  tt  <  arg  2^  <  „  ""■  i^  we  write 
g*(n+J)'"  foj.  g-(n+i)«^  ^jje  upper  or  lower  sign  being  taken  according  as 
arg  2  is  positive  or  negative. 

17*71.     Modified  Bessel  functions  of  the  second  kind. 

When  n  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero,  /_„  (z)  =  In  (z) ;  to  obtain  a  second 
solution  of  the  modified  Bessel  equation  (iv)  of  §  17"7,  we  define*  the  function 
Kn  (z)  for  all  values  of  n  by  the  equation 

-fir„(2)  =  f^j     COSW7rIfo,n(2^),       • 
so  that  Kn  (■2')  =  2  ■"■  {^-n  (^)  —  In  (^)}  COt  WTT. 

Whether  n  he  an  integer  or  not,  this  function  is  a  solution  of  the  modified 
Bessel  equation,  and  when  j  arg  ^  j  <  ^  tt  it  possesses  the  asymptotic  expansion 

for  large  values  of  j  2^  | . 

When  n  is  an  integer,  Kn  (z)  is  defined  by  the  equation 
Kn  (z)  =  lim  -  TT  {/_n_e  (z)  -  In^,  (z)}  cot  ire, 
which  gives  (cf  §  17"61) 

as  an  ascending  series. 

Example.     Shew  that  Kn  (z)  satisfies  the  same  recurrence  formulae  as  /„  (z). 

17"8.  Neumanns  expansion^  of  an  analytic  function  in  a  series  of  Bessel 
coeffijcients. 

We  shall  now  consider  the  expansion  of  an  arbitrary  function  f{z), 
analytic  in  a  domain  including  the  origin,  in  a  series  of  Bessel  coefficients,  in 
the  form 

f{z)  =  Ko^o  {z)  +  ai/i  {z)  +  a^J-,  {z)  +  ..., 
where  a^,  a^,  a^,  ...  are  independent  of  2^. 

*  This  notation  is  due  to  Gray  and  Mathews  {Bessel  Functions,  p.  68)  and  is  now  generally 
adopted  (see  example  40,  p.  377).  The  function  was  first  considered  by  Hankel,  Math.  Ann.  i. 
p.  498. 

t  K.  Neumann,  Jouriuil  fiir  Math,  lxvii.  p.  310  (1807).  The  exposition  here  given  follows 
Kapteyn,  Ann.  de  VEcole  Normale,  (3)  x.  p.  106  (1893). 


368  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Assuming  the  possibility  of  the  expansion,  let  us  determine  the  coefficients  by  com- 
paring the  Maclaurin  expansion 

f{z)=f{0)  +  zf'{0)  +  ~f"{0)  +  ... 

with  the  assumed  series  ;  we  get 

/(0)  =  ao,     2/'(0)  =  a,,..., 


1  !  («-l)  !  '  2!  (?i-2)!  ' 

from  which  we  iind  without  difficulty 

and  hence  an  is  twice  the  residue  of  On{t)  f{t)  at  t=0  where 

2"-^?i!  f  z^  2* "i 

On{z)-    ^„  +  i      [^'*'2(2?i-T)'''2.4(2?i-2)(2/i-4)"'""*J  ' 

the  series  terminating  with  the  term  in  2"  or  2»-i. 

1    f(o+) 
Thus  a„=-.  On{t)f{t)dt, 

TTl  J 

the  contour  enclosing  no  singularities  of  f{t). 
Example.     Shew  that 

00(0=^-',    Oi(0=-Oo'(0. 
17'81.     Proof  of  Neumanns  expansion. 

The  method  of  §  17*8  merely  determined  the  coefficients  in  Neumann's 
expansion,  on  the  hypothesis  that  the  expansion  existed  and  that  its  rearrange- 
ment in  powers  of  z  was  legitimate. 

To  obtain  a  proof  of  the  validity  of  the  expansion,  we  observe  that  * 

0,,  {t)=r  \  t-^-'  e-"^  [{w  +  {x'  -f-  f  )*}"  +  {x-  (x'  +  t')^'']  dx. 

io   -^ 

Hence 

Oo(0^o(^)+2    t     On(t)Jn{2)  =  t-'       t  —. ^       Jn{z)e-^dx. 

»  =  1  >i=-ocJO      (  f  J 

We   shall  now  prove   that   the   series   on  the  left  converges  uniformly  with  regard 
to  t  when  j  2  |  <  1  ^  [  =  1,  and  the  interchange  of  summation  and  integration  is  justified. 


When  n  ^  N,  we  have 


Mz)\^ll-^,{^+K^), 


■2»?i 
where  K    depends  only  on  N and  2  (not  on  n)  and  K^^-^0  as  N-*- x  ;  tind  if  |  <  I  =  1, 

— =-^ — — '—      <  2"  (^4-  !)"■. 

*  This  result  is  obvious  when  7i:=0  or  1  ;  it  is  easily  proved  by  induction  for  integer  values 
of  n  from  the  example  of  §  17'8. 


17"81,  17-82]  BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  369 

Hence 

M  -w    r "  ('^  4-1  "1"  1 2 1 " 

2      \On{t)Jn{z)\<^\t\-^      2  -^^   V        {-^+K^)e-'dx 

n=N+\  n=N+l  JO  ^  ' 

M 

<2e      2      i2|"(l  +  ^   ), 

H=N+l 

and,  for  any  fixed  value  of  z,  this  can  be  made  arbitrarily  small  by  taking  If  sufficiently 
large.  Hence  the  series  in  question  converges  uniformly  on  the  circle  |  <  |  =  1  ;  and  since 
both 

2      0,,{t)Jn{z)   and       2  N    "^     ^    '  \   Jn{z)\e-'dx 

W=iV+l  n=N+l  y  0    I   I  f  I  1 

tend  to  zero  as  iV-*- oo,  it  is  not  very  difficult  to  see  that  the  interchange  of  summation 
and  integration  is  justifiable  (cf.  §  4'7). 

Consequently,  if  |  ^^  |  <  j  t  j  =  1,  we  have 

Oo  (0  J,  (^)  +  2    5     On  it)  Jn  {Z)  =  t-^  r      i       {^^(^+^Y  j^  ^^^  g_,  ^^ 
n=l  Jo    M=-«)    (  f  J 


=  t~^  \    exp  i- —  x\  dx 


=  {t-z)-\ 
by  §  17"1 ;  and  the  series  on  the  left  converges  uniformly  with  regard  to  t. 
Hence,  if  f{t)  be  analytic  when  j  i  |  :$  1,  we  have,  when  |  ^  |  <  1, 

=  2^  \f{t)  jOo  (0  ^0  {z)  +  2  J^  0„  it)  Jn  (^)|  dt 

=  J,(z)f{0)+   2    '^^^  \On{t)f{t)dt, 
M  =  l       TTl      J 

by  §  4*7,  the  paths  of  integration  being  the  circle  |  ^  j  =  1 ;  and  this  establishes 
the  validity  of  Neumann's  expansion  when  |  ^^  |  <  1  and  f(t)  is  analytic  when 

\t\^l. 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

cos 0  =  Jo  (2)  —  2^2  {z)  +  2Ji  (2)  -  ..., 

sin2  =  2Ji(2)-2J3(2)  +  2J5(2)-....  (K.  Neumann.) 

Example  2.     Shew  that 

(i2)»=  j/^^  +  '^)-^  +  ^-^)'.4,..(2).  (K.  Neumann.) 

17-82.     Schlumilch's  expansion  of  an  arbitrary  function  in  a  series  of  Bessel  coefficients 
of  order  zero. 

Schlomilch*   has  given    an  expansion   of  quite  a   different   character  from   that   of 
Neumann,     His  result  may  be  stated  thus  : 

*  Zeitschrift  filr  Math.  u.  Physik,  11.  (1857). 
W.  .M,  A.  24 


370  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

Any  function  f{a;),  which  has  a  contimious  differential  coefficient  for  all  values  of  x  in 
the  closed  range  (0,  tt),  may  he  expanded  in  the  series 

f{x)  =  aQ  +  aiJf^{x)  +  a2JQ{2x)-^a3jQ{Zx)  +  ..., 

valid  in  this  range;  where 

ao=/(0)+  -  r  u  \     f  {u  sin  6)  dddu, 
'^  J  0       J  0 


2   /""■  /"if 

-  I    u COS nu  f     f  {ti sin 6) dddu  {n>0). 

'"'Jo  Jo 


Schlomilch's  proof  is  substantially  as  follows  : 

Let  F{x)  be  the  continuous  solution  of  the  integral  equation 

/(^)=-  [^ F{xsm(f>)d({>. 
^  J  0 
Then  (§  11-81) 

F{x)=f{0)  +  x  f^'' f'{x Hind) d6. 
J  0 

In  order  to  obtain  Schlomilch's  expansion,  it  is  merely  necessary  to  apply  Fourier's 
theorem  to  the  function  F{xsin(f)).     We  thus  have 

f(x)  =  — f     d(ji  <—  I    F{u)du+-    2    /    cos  nu  cos  (nx  sin  (b)F(u)duy 
'"Jo  {.'"Jo  ^n=lJo  ) 

=  —  /    F{u)du+—  2    I     cos  mi F (u)  Jo  (nx)  du, 

""Jo  ""n^ljo 

the  interchange  of  summation  and  integration  being  permissible  by  §§  4*7  and  9'24. 
In  this  equation,  replace  F{u)  by  its  value  in  terms  of/(w).     Thus  we  have 

/(:(;)  =  1  f"  j/(0)  +  u  j^f  {u  sin  0)  de\  du 

+  -2  JQ{nx)  I    cos  nu  -If  {0)  +  u  f     f '  (ii  sin  6)  d6\  du, 
'"  n=l  Jo  I  ^0  J 

which  gives  Schlomilch's  expansion. 

Example.     Shew  that,  if  0  ^  .r  ^  tt,  the  expression 

is  equal  to  x  ;  but  that,  if  n  ^.^^27r,  its  value  is 

■r +  27r  arc  cos  {■irx~'^)  —  lix^  —  n^), 

where  arc  cos  {irx''^)  is  taken  between  0  and  -  . 

Find  the  value  of  the  expression  when  x  lies  between  2it  and  3n. 

(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

17"9.     Tabulation  of  Bessel  functions. 

Hansen  used  the  asymptotic  expansion  (§  17'5)  to  calculate  tables  of  Jn{x)  which  are 
given  in  Lommel's  Studien  uber  die  Bessel'schen  Funktionen. 

Meissel  tabulated  Jq{x)  and  J^ix)  to  12  places  of  decimals  from  ;p=0  to  a'  =  15-5  {Ahh. 
der  Akad.  zu  Berlin,  1888),  while  the  British  Assoc.  Report  (1909),  p.  33  gives  tables  by 
which  t/„  {x)  and  Y^,{x)  may  be  calculated  when  x>\Q. 


17 '9]  BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  371 

Tables  of  J,{x),  J  Ax),  J_Ax),  J  _Ax)  are  given  by  Dinnik,  Archiv  der  Math,  und 
Phys.  XVIII.  (1911),  p.  337. 

Tables  of  the  second  solution  of  Bessel's  equation  have  been  given  by  the  following 
writers  :  B.  A.  Smith,  Mess,  of  Math.  xxvi.  (1897),  p.  98 ;  Phil.  Mag.  XLV.  (1898),  p.  106 ; 
Aldis,  Proc.  R.  S.  Lxvi.  (1900),  p.  32  ;  Airey,  Phil.  Mag.  xxii.  (1911),  p.  658, 

The  functions  In{x)  have  been  tabulated  in  the  British  Assoc.  Reports,  (1889)  p.  28, 
(1893)  p.  223,  (1896)  p.  98,  (1907)  p.  94;  also  by  Aldis,  Proc.  R.  S.  LXiv.  (1899);  by 
Isherwood,  Proc.  Manchester  Lit.  and  Phil.  Soc.  XLViii.  (1904) ;  and  by  E.  Anding,  Sechs- 
ttellige  Tafeln  der  BesseVschen  Funktionen  imagindren  Argumentes  (Leipzig,  1911). 

Tables  of  J^  {xji),  a  function  employed  in  the  theory  of  alternating  currents  in  wires, 
have  been  given  in  the  British  Assoc.  Reports,  1889,  1893,  1896  and  1912;  by  Kelvin,  Math, 
and  Phys.  Papers,  iii.  p.  493;  by  Aldis,  Proc.  R.  S.  Lxvi.  (1900),  p.  32;  and  by  Savidge, 
Phil.  Mag.  xix.  (1910),  p.  49. 

Formulae  for  computing  the  roots  of  Jq  (^)  '''i^ere  given  by  Stokes,  Camh.  Phil.  Trans,  ix. 
and  the  40  smallest  roots  were  tabulated  by  Wilson  and  Peirce,  Bull.  American  Math. 
Soc.  III.  (1897),  p.  153.  The  roots  of  an  equation  involving  Bessel  functions  were  computed 
by  Kalahne,  Zeitschrift  fitr  Math,  und  Phys.  liv.  (1907),  p.  55. 

A  number  of  tables  connected  with  Bessel  functions  are  given  in  British  Assoc.  Reports, 
1910-1914,  and  also  by  Jahnke  und  Emde,  Funktiontafeln  (Leipzig,  1909), 


KEFEKENCES, 

R,  LiPSCHiTZ,  Crelle,  LVl.  (1859),  pp,  189-196. 

H.  Hankel,  Math.  Ann.  i.  (1869),  pp,  467-501. 

K.  Neumann,  Theorie  der  BesseVschen  Funktionen.     (Leipzig,  1869.) 

E.  LoMMEL,  Studien  uber  die  BesseVschen  Funktionen.     (Leipzig,  1868.)    Math.  Ann. 

III.   IV, 

H.  E.  Heine,  Handbuch  der  Kugelfunktionen.     (Berlin,  1878.) 

R.  Olbricht,  Studien  iiher  die  Kugel-  und  Cylinder-funktionen.     (Halle,  1887.) 

A.  SoMMERFELD,  Math.  Ann.  XLVii. 

N.  Nielsen,  Hatidbuch  der  Cylinderfunktionen.     (Leipzig,  1904,) 

A.  Gray  and  G,  B.  Mathews,  A  Treatise  on  Bessel  Functions. 

J,  W.  Nicholson,  Quarterly  Journal,  xlil  (1911),  pp.  216-224, 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that 

cos (2sin 6)=Jq («)  +  2.^2 (2)  cos 2^  +  2^4 {z) cos 45  + ..., 

sin  (zsin  5)  =  2i7i  (2)  sin  5  +  2  J3  (2)  sin  .35  +  2/5(2)  sin  55+ .... 

(K.  Neumann.) 

2.  By  expanding  each  side  of  the  equations  of  example  1  in  powers  of  sin  5,  express 
z"  as  a  series  of  Bessel  coefficients. 

24—2 


372  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

3.     By  multiplying  the  expansions  for  exp  js'^f^"^)}"  ^^^  ^xp  \  -  ^  z\t  —  )>■  and 
considering  the  terms  independent  of  t,  shew  that 

{Jo  {z)f  +  2  Ki  {z)f  +  2  { ^2  {z)Y  +  2  {J-3  (0)}2  +  , . .  =  1. 
Deduce  that,  for  the  Bessel  coefficients, 

I  Jo  (2)  1^1,     |J«(2)l<2-i,         {n>\) 


when  z  is  real. 
4.     If 


1   /"f 
•^jn*  (^'l  =  -  I    2*^  cos*  «  cos  {mu  —  zs,m.u)du 
"^  J  0 


(this  function  reduces  to  a  Bessel  coefficient  when  k  is  zero  and  m  an  integer),  shew  that 

JJ{z)=    i    ;^,(i2)''i^^-».i,p, 

where  N --,„.% p  is  the  'Cauchy's  number'  defined  by  the  equation 

1     [■" 

277  J    -IT 


Shew  further  that 


J^  (z)=J^~\(z)+J^''2^{z\ 
m^  '         m-l  \  ^   '      m+1  *>  '' 


and  zC  (z)  =  2m  j;+^  (^)  -  2  (^+ 1)  {j;_,  (.)  -  J^^,  (e)}. 

(Bourget,  Liouville  (2)  vi.) 

5.  If  V  and  Jlf  are  connected  by  the  equations 

ir     ET        •     7P                  coaE-e  ,         i    i     , 

M=E—esinL,     cosij=  :; =,     where    e<l, 

shew  that  v  =  M+2(\-e'^)-    2     2  {^ef  J  J"  (me)- sm  mM, 

m=l  ft=0  ^i 

where  J,n''  (z)  is  defined  as  in  example  4.  (Bourget.) 

6.  Prove  that,  if  m  and  n  are  integers, 

P„-(cos^)=^j;„|(^H;y==)* 

where  2=rcos^,  x'^+y'^  —  r'^sm^d,  and  c»'"  is  independent  of  z. 

(Math.  Trip.  1893.) 

7.  Shew  that  the  solution  of  the  differential  equation 

w-'^dz^XA  w  ~2rf^Uy  4 Iv^/  ^^dz\i/)-^v   ~^)  wr"  ' 

where  </>  and  ■v//'  are  arbitrary  functions  of  z,  is 

y=(^y{^J,(f)  +  ^J_,(r/.)}. 

8.  Shew  that 

ji  (.r)+ J3  (0,-)+ J5  (^)+ ... = 5  fjo  (^) + r  {-^0  it)+'^i  (0}  ^<- 1 

2  L  J  0 

(Trinity,  1908. 

9.  Shew  that 

( - )"  r  (/x+ r  +  2?i+ 1)  (i2)'^+_';+2H 


J^{z)J^{z)=    2 


„=o  ?i!r(;i+H+i)r(i/+7i+i)r(/Li+i'+n  +  i) 

for  all  values  of  ^  and  v. 

(Schonholzer.) 


BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  373 

10.  Shew  that,  if  n  is  a  positive  integer  and  m  +  2n  +  l  is  positive, 

(»n- 1)  r  x^Jn^i{x)J.^_y_ {x) dx^x^^-'{J^^i{x)Jn-i  (x)  -  Jri^ (x)}  +(m  + 1)  raf"JnHx)dx. 

11.  Shew  that 


(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 


12.     Shew  that 


13.     Shew  that 


^3(^)  +  3^^)+4^>=0. 
dz  d^ 


Jn^xjz)^      U  {\zf        {\zf 

Jn{z)  K+1-  «  +  2-  «  +  3-...' 


(Lommel.) 


14.     If     "-!-y^^  be  denoted  by  Qn  (z),  shew  that 

2«/re  {Z) 


}n(z)_l      2{n+l) 


Qn{z)  +  z{Qn(z)}^ 


(K.  Neumann.) 
(K.  Neumann.) 


dz         z 

15.  Shew  that,  if  R'^  =  r'^  +  r^  —  2rri  cos  d  and  rj  >  r  >  0, 

Jo{R)  =  Jo{r)Jo{ri)  +  2   2   J,,  (r)  J,,  (r^)  cos  nd, 

n  =  l 

To  (R)  =  Jq  {r)  To  (r^)  +  2   2   c4  (r)  7„  (r^)  cos  7id. 

n=i 

16.  Shew  that,  if  R  {n  +  ^)  >  0, 

/      J^n  (22  cos  e)de  =  \iT  {Jn  {z)Y. 

J  0 

17.  Shew  how  to  express  z'^'^J^n  (z)  in  the  form 

AJ2{2)  +  BJo{z), 

where  A,  B  are  polynomials  in  z  ;  and  prove  that 

J4(6^)  +  3Jo(6*)  =  0, 

3Jo(30*)  +  5^2(30*)  =  0. 

(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 

18.  Shew  that,  if  a  t^,i3  and  «->-!, 

(oc  (  d  d  ] 

(a-  -  /32)    I     xJn  (ax)  J„  {^X)  dx  =  X  \  Jn  (ox)  j-  Jn  (^x)  -  Jn  {^x)  j-  Jn  (ax)  V  , 

2a2  r  X  {Jn  {ax)Y  dx=  {a\v'-  -  n')  {Jn  (ax)}'-  +  ix  ~  Jn  {ax)y . 

19.  Prove  that,  if  ?i>  -  1,  and  Jn{a)  =  Jn  (/S)  =  0  while  a  ^  ^, 

/    xJn{ax)  Jn{^x)dx=0,  and    I   x  {Jn{ax)Y dx=h{Jn^i{a)}\ 
Jo  Jo 

Hence  prove  that,  when  ?i>-l,  the  roots  of  Jn{x)  =  0,  other  than  zero,  are  all  real  and 
unequal. 

[If  a  could  be  complex,  take  ^  to  be  the  conjugate  complex.] 

(Lommel,  Studien  iiber  die  BesseV schen  Funktiouen,  p.  69.) 


37-4  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

20.  Let  x^  f{x)  satisfy  Dirichlet's  conditions  (§  9'22)  in  the  range  0  ^  a?  ^  1 ;  let  5"  be 
a  real  constant  and  let  n  ^  0, 

Then,  Mk^^k^,...  denote  the  positive  roots  of  the  equation 
k-'^{kJ^{k)  +  HJr,{k)}=0, 
shew  that/(;r)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

where  A,.—     I    x  {Jn  (kr^)}^  dx  \      I    xf{x)Jn(krX)dx. 

In  the  special  case  when  H=  —  n,  ki  is  to  be  taken  to  be  zero,  the  equation  deter- 
mining ^1,  k2, ...  being  Jn  +  i  {k)==0,  and  the  first  term  of  the  expansion  is  AqX"'  where 

Ao={2n  +  2)  I    af^-*-^f{x)dx. 
Jo 

Discuss,  in  particular,  the  case  when  H  is  infinite,  so  that  Jn  {k)  =  0,  shewing  that 

J  0 

[This  result  is  due  to  Hobson,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  (2)  vii.  p.  349  ;  the  formal 
expansion  was  given  (when  n=0)  by  Fourier  and  (for  general  values  of  n)  by  Lommel. 
The  formula  when  H——n  was  given  incorrectly  by  Dini,  Serie  di  Fourier^  the  term  ^o-^" 
being  printed  as  Jq,  and  this  error  was  not  corrected  by  Nielsen.  See  Bridgeman,  Phil. 
Mag.  (6)  xvi.  p.  947  and  Chree,  Phil.  Mag.  (6)  xvii.  p.  330.] 

21.  Prove  that,  if  the  expansion 

exists  as  a  uniformly  convergent  series  when  —a^x^a,  where  Xi,  X2, ...  are  the  positive 
roots  of  Jo(^o^)  =  0,  then 

An=  8  {aX„3  Jj  (X„a)}-i.  (Clare,  1900.) 

22.  If  ^'1,  X*2)  •••  f^i's  the  positive  roots  of  J„(^a)  =  0,  and  if 


this  series  converging  uniformly  when  0  <  .r  ^  a,  then 

Ar  =  ^~^  (4^  +  4 -aV)  ^^^^4^. 
k/  'da 


23.     Shew  that 


(Math.  Trip.  1906.) 

Jn  {X)  =  ^n-.n-X^^,^_,^^  j  ^     J^ioC  siu  6)  COs2»-2»»-l  6  sin»»  ^^  6d6 

when  n>TO>  —  1. 

24.     Shew  that,  if  a-  >  0, 

/;o..3-.).=3'^:{...(^)...,(|!)}. 

(Nicholson.) 


BESSEL  FUNCTIONS  375 

26,    If  m  be  a  positive  integer  and  u>0,  deduce  from  Bessel's  integral  formula  that 

e-a.lnhu  J-^  (_y)  c;_y_g-mu  gech  M. 

(Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

26.  Prove  that,  when  ^  >  0, 

2  r* 

Jq(x)=-  I     ain{xcoa'ht)dt. 

T  j  0 

[Take  the  contour  of  §  17'1  to  be  the  imaginary  axis  indented  at  the  origin  and  a 
semicircle  on  the  left  of  this  line.] 

Prove  also  that 

l^o(^)««i— 2  I     cos  (^  cosh  f)  0?^  (Sonine.) 

Jo 

27.  Shew  that 


/    x~ '^jQ{xt)  sin  xdx  =  ^7r  0<^<1 

I 

=arccosec<  ^>1     j 

/     x-^  Ji{xt)  sin  xdx  =  t-'^  {I- {I- i^)^}        0<t<l 


=  «-!  ^>1 

28.     Shew  that 


(Weber.) 


M-  /" "  e"'-^'"^ ^{A+B  log  (r  sin2  $)}  d6 
is  the  solution  of 

^^  +  Y£-nH^O.  (Trinity,  1886.) 

29.  Prove  that  no  relation  of  the  form 

8=0 

can  exist  for  rational  values  of  N^,  n  and  x.  (Math.  Trip.  1901.) 

[Express  the  left-hand  side  in  terms  of  Jn{x)  and  Jn  +  x{x)^  and  shew  by  example  12 
that  Jn  +  \{x)jJn{x)  is  irrational  when  n  and  x  are  rational.] 

30.  Prove  that,  when  R{n)>  —  \, 

-"" ^'^-  2"-ir(,^+i)r(i)  V^  +  cp;       \-Y~) ' 

[(..-)-. ea„.  ,.^i-.(.i.Mizl>  ......     W..^^./>..] 

(Hargreave,  Phil.  Trains.  1848  ;  Macdonald,  Proc.  London  Math.  Sac.  xxix.) 

31.  Shew  that,  when  R{m  +  \)>0, 

/2\i  th^ 

[  —  )   \     ^w(2sin(9)sin™  +  i^c?^=2-i  J^  +  j(4 

(Hobson.) 


376  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

32.  Shew  that,  if  2n  +  l>m>-l,  '    ■ 

jo  r(«-|m  +  ^) 

(Math.  Trip.  1898.) 

33.  Shew  that 

(Lommel.) 

34.  In  the  equation 

n  is  real;  shew  that  a  solution  is  given  by 

,      ,  ,  °°  (  -  )"*  2^'"  COS  (tt™  — « log  Z) 

COS  w  log  z)-    2    ^-^ . ^'". ^-^ ., 

m=i  a^w'm!  (l+Ti'y  (4  +  «2)* (m2  +  %2)* 

?» 
where  Um  denotes     2  arc  tan  (n/r). 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

35.  Shew  that,  when  n  is  large  and  positive, 

J^{n)  =  2-i3-in-^r{l)n--s  +  o{n-'^). 

(Nicholson,  Phil.  Mag.  1908.) 

36.  Shew  that 

(Mehler.) 

37.  Shew  that 

eAcose^2»-ir(«)  2  (7i  +  ^)C;(cos^)X-"/„  +  ;t(X). 

(Math.  Trip.  1900.) 

38.  Shew  that,  if 

Tf=  I    Jm{ax)Jm{bx)J„,{cx)x^-'"dx; 

a,  b,  c  being  positive,  and  m  is  a  j)ositive  integer  or  zero,  then 
W=0        (a-bf>c\ 

W=  -    , — {2262c2-2an™-i         (a  +  6)2>c2>(a-6)2, 

23m-l^ir(m  +  ^)' 

W=0         {a  +  by>c^.  (Sonine,  Math.  Ann.  xvi.) 

39.  Shew  that  if  ?i>— 1,     m>-|  and 

W=  I    Jn  (ax)  Jn  (bx)  Jm  (ex)  x^  ~ '"  dx, 
Jo 
a,  b,  c  being  positive,  then 

W=0        {a-bf>c\ 

Pf=(2,r)-ia'»-i6»-ic-»^(l-/i2)i(2'»-i)pi-^(^)         {a  +  bf>c^>{a-b)\ 

TT  W— 5 

c^>{a+bf, 
where  ii  =  {aP'  +  b^-G'^)l2ab,     ixi=  -  fx. 

(Macdonald,  Froc.  London  Math.  Soc.  (2)  vii.) 


BESSEL   FUNCTIONS  377 

40.  Shew  that,  if  R{m+^)>0, 

^-^^>=  2>»r(m+^)r(i)  jo  coah(.co80)8in2-</.#, 
and,  if  |arg2|<^»r, 

„    .  ,      z^T  (A)  cos  wtt  /■"  ,  ^ 

^^ ^')  =    2^r{m  +  ^)    j „  «~'°''^* 8inh2-(/.c^. 
Prove  also  that 

jr,„(3)  =  7r~*2'»2-'"r(m  +  |)cosm7r  I    (m2  +  22)-'^-*cosmc^m. 

(Math.  Trip.  1898.     Cf.  Basset,  Proc.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.  vi.) 
[The  first  integral  may  be  obtained  by  expanding  in  powers  of  z  and  integrating  term- 
by-term.     To  obtain  the  second,  consider 

/•(1+,  -1+)  _    , 

where  initially  arg(<- l)=arg(<-f-l)  =  0.     Take  \t\>\  on  the  contour,  expand  (<2-l)"*~*  in 
descending  powers  of  t,  and  integrate  term  by  term.     The  result  is 

aze^'"""  sin  (2m7r)  V  (2m)  2-^  r  (1  -  m)  /_,„  (2). 

Also,  deforming  the  contour  by  flattening  it,  the  integral  becomes 

2ie2'»«0msin2«i7r  f   e-^«  (i;2-l)'""*(^;  +  2ie2'"''*>  cosmTr  P   e-'^  (l-f)"'-^ df, 
and  consequently 

41.  Shew  that  (?„  (2)  satisfies  the  differential  equation 

where  ^^^  =  2-1  l^n  even),    gn=nz-'^  (n  odd). 

(K.  Neumann.) 

42.  If  f(z)  be  analytic  throughout  the  ring-shaped  region  bounded  by  the  circles  c,  C 
whose  centres  are  at  the  origin,  establish  the  expansion 

/(s)  =Uo  Jo  {^)  +  aiJi  {z)  +  aoJ2  (2)  + . .. 

+  i^oOo{z)+^iOi{z)+^,0^{z)  +  ..., 

where  «« =  ^-  f  /  (0  ^»  (0  ^^,    /3»  =  -•  f  /  (^)  '^^  (^)  ^^- 

m  J  c  'rri  J  c 

(K.  Neumann.) 

43.  Shew  that,  if  x  and  y  are  positive, 

j^  ~-^Joi.ky)kdk  =  ~~-, 

where  r=  +sI{^'^-\-y^)  and  ^=  +J(Jc^ -  1)  or  i  J{\  - B)  according  as  ^>  1  or  ^<  1. 

(Math.  Trip.  1905.) 

44.  Shew  that,  with  suitable  restrictions  on  the  form  of  the  function /(^), 

f{x)  =  [     J^  {tx)  1 1  f    f{x')  ./o  {tx')  x'  dx\  dt. 

[A  proof  with  an  historical  account  of  this  important  theorem  is  given  by  Nielsen, 
Cylinderfunktionen,  pp.  360-363.] 


378  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVII 

45.  If  C  be  any  closed  contour,  and  m  and  n  are  integers,  shew  that 

j^J^  {z)  J^  {z)  dz={    0^  {z)  0„  {z)  dz=ij^  {z)  0„  {z)  dz=0, 

unless  C  contains  the  origin  and  m  =  n  ;  in  which  case  the  first  two  integrals  are  still  zero, 
but  the  third  is  equal  to  iri  (or  2ni  if  m  =  0)  if  C  encircles  the  origin  once  counter- 
clockwise. (K.  Neumann.) 

46.  Shew  that,  if 

{-Y  _ 

and  if  ?i  be  a  positive  integer,  then 

n 

m=l 

n-1 

while  si-2"=a„_i,„_iOo(^)  +  2-2  a„_^_i,„+„i_i 02^(4 

m=\ 

(K.  Neumann.) 

.  „        ^  „  /    N  "    22"*  (m  !)2   7^2  1^2  _  12J  1^2  _  22}  . . .  {?l2  -  (?» -  1)2} 

47.  it  0«(y)=^2^-2^^^j-  ^^^  , 

shew  that 

(^2  _  ^2)_i  =  Q^  (3^)  {j^  (^)}2  +  2  i  Q„  (3^)  {/„  (a;)}2 

when  the  series  on  the  right  converges.  (K.  Neumann,  Math.  Ann.  ill.) 

48.  Shew  that,  if  c>  0,  ^  (%)  >  -  1  and  R{a±  hf  >  0,  then 

J,  (a)  J„  {b)=^.  f '"^" '  «-i  exp  {(<2  -  a2  _  52)/(2^)} .  /„  (abjt)  dt. 

(Macdonald,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  xxxil.) 

49.  Deduce  from  example  48,  or  otherwise  prove,  that 

(a2  +  62_2a6cos^)-*'V„{(a2  +  62-2a6cos^)*} 

=  2«r(«)  2  (m  +  ?i)  a-'»6-»J^  +  „  («)/„+„  (6)  C^»  (cos  ^). 

m=0 

(Gegenbauer,  Wien.  Sitzungsberichte,  LXix,  lxxiv.) 

50.  Shew  that 

y=(jm{t)Jn{tzi)t^-^dt 

satisfies  the  equation 

if  kt^  Jm  (0  Jn  {tZ^)  -i"*'  Jm'  (0  ^n  {tZ^  +  zh"^^  J^  {t)  J„'  (tZ^) 

resumes  its  initial  value  after  describing  the  contour. 
Deduce  that 

(Math.  Trip.  1903.) 


CHAPTER  XVIII 


THE  EQUATIONS  OF  MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS 

18'1.     The  differential  equations  of  mathematical  physics. 

The  functions  which  have  been  introduced  in  the  preceding  chapters  are 
of  importance  in  the  applications  of  mathematics  to  physical  investigations. 
Such  applications  are  outside  the  province  of  this  book ;  but  most  of  them 
depend  essentially  on  the  fact  that,  by  means  of  these  functions,  it  is  possible 
to  construct  solutions  of  certain  partial  differential  equations,  of  which  the 
following  are  among  the  most  important : 

(I)     Laplace's  equation 

which  was  originally  introduced  in  a  memoir*  on  Saturn's  rings. 

If  {x,  y,  z)  be  the  rectangular  coordinates  of  any  point  in  space,  this  equation  is 
satisfied  by  the  following  functions  which  occur  in  various  branches  of  mathematical 
physics  : 

(i)      The  gravitational  potential  in  regions  not  occupied  by  attracting  matter. 

(ii)     The  electrostatic  potential  in  a  uniform  dielectric,  in  the  theory  of  electro- 
statics. 

(iii)    The  magnetic  potential  in  free  aether,  in  the  theory  of  magnetostatics. 

(iv)     The  electric  potential,  in  the  theory  of  the  steady  flow  of  electric  currents  in 
solid  conductors. 

(v)     The  temperature,  in  the  theory  of  thermal  equilibrium  in  solids. 

(vi)     The  velocity  potential  at  points  of  a  homogeneous  liquid  moving  irrotationally, 
in  hydrodynamical  problems. 

Notwithstanding  the  physical  differences  of  these  theories,  the  mathematical  investi- 
gations are  much  the  same  for  all  of  them  :  thus,  the  problem  of  thermal  equilibrium  in  a 
solid  when  the  points  of  its  surface  are  maintained  at  given  temperatures  is  mathe- 
matically identical  with  the  problem  of  determining  the  electric  intensity  in  a  region 
when  the  points  of  its  boundary  are  maintained  at  given  potentials. 

*  Mem.  de  VAcad.  des  Sciences,  1787  (published  1789),  p.  252. 


380  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

(II)  The  equation  of  wave  motions 

dx"  ^  df  "^  dz'  ~  c'  dt^  ' 

This  equation  is  of  general  occurrence  in  investigations  of  undulatory  disturbances 
propagated  with  velocity  c  independent  of  the  wave  length  ;  for  example,  in  the  theory  of 
electric  waves  and  the  electro-magnetic  theory  of  light,  it  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  each 
component  of  the  electric  or  magnetic  vector ;  in  the  theory  of  elastic  vibrations,  it 
is  the  equation  satisfied  by  each  component  of  the  displacement ;  and  in  the  theory 
of  sound,  it  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  the  velocity  potential  in  a  perfect  gas. 

(III)  The  equation  of  conduction  of  heat 

dx"  "^  By""  "*"  dz^  ~  k  dt  ' 

This  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  the  temperature  at  a  point  of  a  homogeneous  isotropic 
body ;  the  constant  k  is  proportional  to  the  heat  conductivity  of  the  body  and  inversely 
proportional  to  its  specific  heat  and  density. 

(IV)  A  particular  case  of  the  preceding  equation  (II),  when  the 
variable  z  is  absent,  is 

a^  "*"  dy-  ~  (?  dt'  ■ 

This  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  the  displacement  in  the  theory  of  transverse  vibrations 
of  a  membrane  ;  the  equation  also  occurs  in  the  theory  of  wave  motion  in  two  dimensions. 

(V)  The  equation  of  telegraphy 

This  is  the  equation  satisfied  by  the  potential  in  a  telegraph  cable  when  the  inductance 
L,  the  capacity  K,  and  the  resistance  R  per  unit  length  are  taken  into  account. 

It  would  not  be  possible,  within  the  limits  of  this  chapter,  to  attempt 
an  exhaustive  account  of  the  theories  of  these  and  the  other  differential 
equations  of  mathematical  physics ;  but,  by  considering  selected  typical 
cases,  we  shall  expound  some  of  the  principal  methods  employed,  with 
special  reference  to  the  uses  of  the  transcendental  functions. 

18"2.     Boundary  conditions. 

A  problem  which  arises  very  frequently  is  the  determination,  for  one  of  the 
equations  of  §  18"1,  of  a  solution  which  is  subject  to  certain  boundary  con- 
ditions ;  thus  we  may  desire  to  find  the  temperature  at  any  point  inside  a 
homogeneous  isotropic  conducting  solid  in  thermal  equilibrium  when  the 
points  of  its  outer  surface  are  maintained  at  given  temperatures.  This 
amounts  to  finding  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  at  points  inside  a  given 
surface,  when  the  value  of  the  solution  at  points  on  the  surface  is  given. 

A  more  complicated  problem  of  a  similar  nature  occurs  in  discussing 
small  oscillations  of  a  liquid  in  a  basin,  the  liquid  being  exposed  to  the 
atmosphere  ;  in  this  problem  we  are  given,  effectively,  the  velocity  potential 


18*2,  18*3]  THE   EQUATIONS   OF   MATHEMATICAL   PHYSICS  381 

at  points  of  the  free  surface  and  the  normal  derivate  of  the  velocity  potential 
where  the  liquid  is  in  contact  with  the  basin. 

The  nature  of  the  boundary  conditions,  necessary  to  determine  a  solution 
uniquely,  varies  very  much  with  the  form  of  differential  equation  considered, 
even  in  the  case  of  equations  which,  at  first  sight,  seem  very  much  alike. 
Thus  a  solution  of  the  equation 

(which  occurs  in  the  problem  of  thermal  equilibrium  in  a  conducting 
cylinder)  is  uniquely  determined  at  points  inside  a  closed  curve  in  the 
ary-plane  by  a  knowledge  of  the  value  of  V  at  points  on  the  curve ;  but 
in  the  case  of  the  equation 

(which  effectively  only  differs  from  the  former  in  a  change  of  sign),  occurring 

in   connexion  with  transverse   vibrations   of  a   stretched   string,  where   V 

denotes  the  displacement   at  time  t  at   distance   x  from    the  end   of  the 

string,  it  is  physically  evident  that  a  solution  is  determined  uniquely  only  if 

dV 
both  V  and  -^  are  given  for  all  values  of  x  such  that  O^x^l,  when  ^  =  0 

(where  I  denotes  the  length  of  the  string). 

Physical  intuitions  will  usually  indicate  the  nature  of  the  boundary 
conditions  which  are  necessary  to  determine  a  solution  of  a  differential 
equation  uniquely;  but  the  existence  theorems  which  are  necessary  from 
the  point  of  view  of  the  pure  mathematician  are  usually  very  tedious  and 
difficult*. 

18"3.     A  general  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  f. 

It  is  possible  to  construct  a  general  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  in 
the  form  of  a  definite  integral.  This  solution  can  be  employed  in  solving 
problems  involving  boundary  conditions  of  a  certain  type. 

Let  V  (x,  y,  z)  be  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  which  can  be  expanded 
into  a  power  series  in  three  variables  valid  for  points  of  {x,  y,  z)  sufficiently 
near  a  given  point  {x^,  y^,  Zq).     Accordingly  we  write 

X=Xo  +  X,      y  =  y^+Y,     z  =  Zo  +  Z; 
and  we  assume  the  expansion 

F=  ao  +  a,X  +  b,Y+c,Z+  a^X''  +  kY^  +  c^Z"- 

+  U^YZ-v'ie^ZX  +  2/;ZF+  ..., 
it  being  supposed  that  this  series  is  absolutely  convergent  whenever 

IZp  +  IFj^+lZl^^a, 

*  See  e.g.  Forsyth,  Theory  of  Functions,  pp.  442-459,  where  an  apparently  simple  problem 
is  discussed. 

t  Whittaker,  Math.  Ann.  lvii.  (1902),  p.  333. 


382  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

where  a  is  some  positive  constant*.  If  this  expansion  exists,  V  is  said  to 
be  analytic  at  {x^,  y^,  z^).  It  can  be  proved  by  the  methods  of  §§  3'7,  47 
that  the  series  converges  uniformly  throughout  the  domain  indicated  and 
may  be  differentiated  term-by-term  with  regard  to  X,  Y  or  Z  any  number  of 
times  at  points  inside  the  domain. 

If  we  substitute  the  expansion  in  Laplace's  equation,  which  may  be 
written 

and  equate  to  zero  (§  3*73)  the  coefficients  of  the  various  powers  of  X,  Y 
and  Z,  we  get  an  infinite  set  of  linear  relations  between  the  coefficients, 
of  which 

(12  +  ^2  +  C2  =  0 

may  be  taken  as  typical. 

There  are  ^n{7i  —  l)  of  these  relations f  between  the  ^(n  +  2){n  +  l) 

coefficients  of  the  terms  of  degree  n  in  the  expansion  of  V,  so  that  there 

are   only   ^  (n  +  2)  (n  +  1)  —  ^'^^  (n  —  1)  =  2n  +  1   independent   coefficients   in 

the  terms  of  degree  n  in  V.  Hence  the  terms  of  degree  n  in  V  must  be 
a  linear  combination  of  2n  +  1  linearly  independent  particular  solutions  of 
Laplace's  equation,  these  solutions  being  each  of  degree  n  in  X,  Y  and  Z. 

To  find  a  set  of  such  solutions,  consider  (Z  +  iX  cos  u  +  iY  sin  u)'^;  it  is 
a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  which  may  be  expanded  in  a  series  of  sines 
and  cosines  of  multiples  of  u,  thus : 

n  n 

S  gm  {X,  Y,  Z)  cos  mu  +  %  hm  {X,  Y,  Z)  sin  mu, 

vi=0  m=l 

the  functions  g^  (X,  Y,  Z)  and  h^  {X,  Y,  Z)  being  independent  of  u.  The 
highest  power  of  Z  in  g^n  {X,  Y,  Z)  and  h^  (X,  Y,  Z)  is  Z^~^  and  the  former 
function  is  an  even  function  of  Y,  the  latter  an  odd  function ;  hence 
the  functions  are  linearly  independent.  They  therefore  form  a  set  of 
2n  +  1  functions  of  the  type  sought. 

Now  by  Fourier's  rulej  (§  9"12) 

irgm  (X,Y,Z)=l      {Z  +  iX  cos  u  +  iF  sin  uY  cos  mudu, 

J    -TT 

Trillin  (X,  Y,  Z)=  \      (Z  +  iX  cos  u  +  iY sin  uY  sin  mudu, 

J    —IT 

*  The  functions  of  applied  mathematics  satisfy  this  condition. 

t  If  a^,t,t  (where  r  +  s-\-t  =  n)  be  the  coefBcieiat  of  Xi'Y^Z^  in  V,  and  if  the  terms  of  degree 

71  -  2  in  jT— ^  +  ^-^2  +  s  yl  ^^  arranged  primarily  in  powers  of  X  and  secondarily  in  powers  of  Y, 

the  coetticient  a,.,8,<  does  not  occur  in  any  term  after  X^-'^Y'Z^  (or  X^Y'~^Z*  if  r  =  0  or  1),  and 
hence  the  relations  are  all  linearly  independent. 

X  27r  must  be  written  for  tt  in  the  coefficient  of  go  (X,  Y,  Z). 


18-3]  THE   EQUATIONS  OF   MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS  883 

and  so  any  linear  combination  of  the  2n+l  solutions  can  be  written  in  the 
form 


/: 


(Z  4-  iX  cos  u  +  iY sin  w)"/n  (w)  du, 

where  /„  (u)  is  a  rational  function  of  e*". 

Now  it  is  readily  verified  that,  if  the  terms  of  degree  n  in  the  expression 
assumed  for  V  be  written  in  this  form,  the  series  of  terms  under  the  integral 
sign  converges  uniformly  if  |Zp+|Fp+jZp  be  sufficiently  small,  and  so 
(§  4*7)  we  may  write 

V=  j       t  {Z  +  iX  cos  u  +  iY sin  w)"/„ {u)  du. 

J  -w  n-0 

But  any  expression  of  this  form  may  be  written 

V  =  I      F(Z  +  iX  cos u  +  iF sin  u,  u)  du, 

J  —w 

where  F  is  a  function  such  that  differentiations  with  regard  to  X,  Y  or  Z 
under  the  sign  of  integration  are  permissible.  And,  conversely,  if  F  be  any 
function  of  this  type,  F  is  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation. 

This  result  may  be  written 


V  =  I     f(z  +  ix  cos  u  +  iy  sin  u,  u)  du, 

J    —77 


on  absorbing  the  terms  —2o  —  '^^a  cos  u  —  iy^  sin  u  into  the  second  variable  ; 
and,  if  differentiations  under  the  sign  of  integration  are  permissible,  this 
gives  a  general  solution  of  Laplace's  equation ;  that  is  to  say,  every  solution 
of  Laplace's  equation  which  is  analytic  throughout  the  interior  of  some 
sphere  is  expressible  by  an  integral  of  the  form  given. 

This  result  is  the  three-dimensional  analogue  of  the  theoreni  that 

V=f{x-\-iy)+g{x-iy) 
is  the  general  solution  of 

dx^      dy'^ 

[Note.  A  distinction  has  to  be  drawn  between  the  primitive  of  an  ordinary  differential 
equation  and  general  integrals  of  a  partial  dififerential  equation  of  order  higher  than  the 
first*. 

Two  apparently  distinct  primitives  are  always  directly  transformable  into  one  another 

by  means  of  suitable  relations  between  the  constants ;  thus  in  the  case  of    i  o+y  —  ^,  ^ve 

can  obtain  the  primitive  Csin(A'  +  e)  from  A  aoa  x + B  ^m  x  by  defining  C  and  e  by  the 
equations  Csin  e  =  A,  Gcose  =  B.  On  the  other  hand,  every  solution  of  Laplace's  equation 
is  expressible  in  each  of  the  forms 

/      f{x  cos  t+y  sin  t  +  iz,  t)  dt,      I       g  {i/  cos  u  +  z  sin  u  +  ix,  u)  du  ; 

*  For  a  discussion  of  general  integrals  of  such  equations,  see  Forsyth,  Theory  of  Differential 
Equations,  Part  iv.  (Vol.  vi.)  Chap.  xii. 


384  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

but  if  these  are  known  to  be  the  same  solution,  there  appears  to  be  no  general  analytical 
relation,  connecting  the  functions  /  and  g,  which  will  directly  transform  one  form  of 
the  solution  into  the  other.] 

Example  1.     Shew  that  the  potential  of  a  particle  of  unit  mass  at  (a,  6,  c)  is 

1    /""•  du 

2t  ./  —:r{z  —  c)-\-i{x  —  a)cosu  +  i{i/-b)s.\nu 

at  all  points  for  which  z>c. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  a  general  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  of  zero  degree  in 
X,  y,  z  is 

/       log {x COS. t->rys.m.t  +  iz)g{t)dt,   if    /"    g{t)dt  =  0. 

Express  the  solutions  — —  and  log  — ^  in  this  form,  where  r^^x^  +  v^  +  z^. 
z+r  r  —  z  '  '  ^    ' 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  in  the  case  of  the  equation 

^2  +  g''  =  X  4- ?/ 

(tiz  'bz\ 

where  p  =  -  ,  j  =  ^  j  ,  integrals  of  Charpit's  subsidiary  equations  (see  Forsyth,  Differential 

Equations,  Chap,  ix.)  are 

(i)       p^-x=y-q^=a, 

(ii)      p  =  q  +  a'^. 

Deduce  that  the  corresponding  general  integrals  are  derived  from 
(i)       z=\{x  +  af  +  ^ij,-af  +  F{a)\ 

(ii)     Az=l  (.r+y)3  +  2a.2  (x  -y)  -  a*  {x+yy^  +  G  {a)\ 
0  =  4a  (.r  - y)  -  4a3  (^•+3/)-i  +  6-"  (a) 

and  thence  obtain  a  differential  equation  determining  the  function  O  (a)  in  terms  of  the 
function  F  (a)  when  the  two  general  integrals  are  the  same. 

18'31.     Solutions  of  Laplace's  equation  involving  Legendre  functions. 
If  an  expansion  for  V,  of  the  form  assumed  in  §  18-3,  exists  when 

^0  —  yo  ~  ■2'o  ==  ^j 

we  have  seen  that  we  can  express  V  as  a  series  of  expressions  of  the  type 
I      {z  +  ix  cos  u  +  iy  sin  u^  cos  mu du,  {z  +  ix  cos  u  +  iy  sin  uY  sin  mudu, 

where  n  and  m  are  integers  such  that  O^vn^n. 

We  shall  now  examine  these  expressions  more  closely. 
If  we  take  polar  coordinates,  defined  by  the  equations 

X  =  r  sin  6  cos  0,     y  =  r  sin  6  sin  0,     z  =  r  cos  6, 


18-31]  THE   EQUATIONS   OF   MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS  385 

we  have 

1      (z  +  ix  cos  u  +  iy  sin  w)"  cos  mudu 

J  -w 

=  r"  I       {cos  d  +  i  sin  6  cos  (u  —  ^)}"  cos  mudu 

J  -n 

=  r''  {cos  ^  + 1  sin  ^  cos  i/rj"  cos  m{<j>  +  yfr)  d-yjr 

J     -TT  — (J) 

=  r"  I      {cos  0  +i  sin  ^  cos yjr}^ cos ??i  (0  +  i/r)  c?\/r 

J     -TT 

=  r"  cos  m<^  I      {cos  6  +  i  sin  ^  cos  i/r}"  cos  mi/rc^-v^, 

since  the  integrand  is  a  periodic  function  of  yfr  and 

(cos  ^  +  i  sin  d  cos  -v/r)"  sin  mi/r 

is  an  odd  function  of  yjr.  Therefore  (§  15-61),  with  Ferrers'  definition  of  the 
associated  Legendre  function, 

f ""  .  .      .  27ri"'' .  n ' 

I      (z  +  ix  cos  'M  +  iy  sin  m)"'  cos  mudu  —  ~, '—  r''^Pn^  (cos  6)  cos  to</>. 

Similarly 

(z  +  ix  cos  w  +  iy  sin  m)**  sin  mudu  =  7 ^i  r'^PJ^  (cos  ^)  sin  7716. 

;-,r  -^  '  {n  +  m)\         '    ^         ^  ^ 

Therefore  7'"P,j™  (cos  ^)  cosm0  and  r^P^^  (cos  6)  sin  mcj)  are  polynomials 
m  X,  y,  z  and  are  particidar  solutions  of  Laplace's  equation.  Further,  by 
§  18'3,  every  solution  of  Laplace's  equation,  which  is  analytic  near  the  origin, 
can  be  expressed  in  the  form 

F  =  S  r''  {AnPn  (cos  e)+  t  (^,,'"''  cos  m(f>  +  5„<"*>  sin  m4>)  P„"*  (cos  ^)| . 

n  =  0         t  m=l  J 

Any  expression  of  the  form 

AnPn  (cos  6)+    1  (^„<"'*  cos  mcf)  +  Bn^'^^  sin  m(f))  Pn"^  (cos  6), 

ni  —  \ 

where  n  is  a  positive  integer,  is  called  a  surface  harmonic  of  degree  n ; 
a  surface  harmonic  of  degree  n  multiplied  by  ?•"■  is  called  a  solid  harmonic 
of  degree  n. 

A  solid  harmonic  of  degree  n  is  evidently  a  homogeneous  polynomial  of  degree  n  in 
X,  y,  z  and  it  satisfies  Laplace's  equation. 

It  is  evident  that,  if  a  change  of  rectangular  coordinates*  is  made  by  rotating  the  axes 
about  the  origin,  a  solid  harmonic  (or  a  surface  harmonic)  of  degree  n  transforms  into 
a  solid  harmonic  (or  a  surface  harmonic)  of  degree  n  in  the  new  coordinates. 

92       ga       92 
*  The  o2)erator  ,— .^  +  ^— ^  +  5-^  is  invariant  for  changes  of  rectangular  axes. 

W.   M.   A.  25 


386  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP,  XVII I 

Example.     If  coordinates  r,  6,  0  are  defined  by  the  equations 

x  =  rcoii6,    y  =  (?-2  -  1  )*  sin  ^  cos  ^,     2=(r2— l)*sin^sin^, 
shew  that  P^'"  (»')  Pn"'  (cos  6)  cos mtf)  satisfies  Laplace's  equation, 

18"4.  The  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  which  satisfies  assigned  boundary 
conditions  at  the  surface  of  a  sphere. 

We  have  seen  (§  18"31)  that  any  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  which 
is  analytic  near  the  origin  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

V(r,e,(}>)=  i  r'^j^^P,  (cos  ^) 

+   2  (AJ^^^  cos  m(f)  +  Bn^""^  sin  m(j>)  Pn""  (cos  6)\  ; 

and,  from  §  3*7,  it  is  evident  that  if  it  converges  for  a  given  value  of  r, 
say  a,  for  all  values  of  6  and  (f>  such  that  O^^^tt,  0-^<f)^  27r,  it  converges 
absolutely  and  uniformly  when  r<  a. 

To  determine  the  constants,  we  must  know  the  boundary  conditions 
which  V  must  satisfy.  A  boundary  condition  of  frequent  occurrence  is 
that  F  is  a  given  bounded  integrable  function  of  0  and  cf),  say  f(0,  </>),  on 
the  surface  of  a  given  sphere,  which  we  take  to  have  radius  a,  and  V  is 
analytic  at  points  inside  this  sphere. 

We  then  have  to  determine  the  coefficients  An,  -4„<'"',  5„<"'>  from  the 
equation 

f{6,  </>)  =  2  a'*  \  AnPn  (cos  6)^  t  (^,,<'»>  COS  m<i>  +  5„<'^»  sin  m<^)  Pn'"  (cos  6) 

n=0  (  m=l 

Assuming  that  this  series  converges  uniformly*  throughout  the  domain 

O^d^TT,     0  ^  (/>  ^  27r, 
multiplying  by 

Pn"^  (cos  ef^^mcb, 

sm     ^ 

integrating  term-by-term  (§  4'7)  and  using  the  results  of  §§  15'14,  15'51  on 
the  integral  properties  of  Legendre  functions,  we  find  that 

r     {^  f{d',  <h')  P„'«  (cos  6')  cos  7n<b'  sin  d'de'd<i>'  =  ira''  ^r^  .  ("Ll^  A,:^\ 
J-nJi)  zn+1   {n  —  m)l 

r    r  f{e',  f)  Pn'^  (cos  e')  sin  m<b'  sin  eWdS'  -  Tra'^  ,^-^,  .  ^''±'^^;  5,/"", 
J  —ttJ 0  zn  +  l   (w  — m)! 

f  "    rf(d',  cf>')  Pn  (cos  6')  sin  e'de'd<^'  =  27ra"  ^^-^  An. 
J  -TT  J  0  zn  +  i 

*  This  is  usually  the  case  in  physical  problems. 


18-4]  THE    EQUATIONS   OF   MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS  387 

Therefore,  when  r  <  a, 

V{r,  6,  «/,)  =  IJ^  (^)"  f[Jlf(^'  ^')  {^n(«o«  ^)  ^«(co8  &) 

+  22  (l!li:!^  P^r^ (cos  6)  Pn*"  (cos  6')  COS  m  (<^  -  (^o[  sin  ffdO'di^'. 

The  series  which  is  here  integrated  term-by-term  converges  uniformly 
when  r  <  a,  since  the  expression  under  the  integral  sign  is  a  bounded 
function  of  6,  6',  <^,  <^',  and  so  (§  4*7 ) 

^'irV{r,d,<^)=r    \^ f{e\4>')  i  (2n  +  l)(-Y'|p„(cos^)P,(cos^) 

+  22  ^^~^^'.  PrT  (cos  (9)  P„™  (cos  d')  COS  m  (<^  -  <^')[  sin  d'd&d4>'. 

Now  suppose  that  we  take  the  line  {6,  (f>)  as  a  new  polar  axis  and  let 
i^iy  4>i)  be  the  new  coordinates  of  the  line  whose  old  coordinates  were  (6\  (j>')  ; 
we  consequently  have  to  replace  P„  (cos  6)  by  1  and  P^"'  (cos  6)  by  zero ;  and 
so  we  get 

4>7rV(r,e,cf>)=  f{0',4>')  2  (2w  +  l)    -1   Pn{cos  6,')  sin  6,' de,'d(f>,' 

J-jrJo  n=0  V'^/ 

7(^'>  f)  S  (2n  +  l)    -     Pn{cose,')sm0'dd'd<}>'. 

J— IT  Jo  »=0  \^/ 

If,  in  this  formula,  we  make  use  of  the  result  of  example  23  of  Chapter  xv 
(p.  326),  we  get 

J  -TT.  0  (r^  -  2ar  cos  ^i  +  a^f 

and  so 

47rF(r,  ^,  0) 

/(^',  (f>')  sin  6''c^^'c^(^' 


=  a  (a2  -  ?'2) 


77  fTT 


-TT./  0  [r^  -  2ar  {cos  ^  cos  6'  +  sin  ^  sin  6'  cos  (<^  -  <^')}  +  <^^]*' 

In  this  compact  formula  the  Legendre  functions  have  ceased  to  appear 
explicitly. 

The  last  formula  can  be  obtained  by  the  theory  of  Greenes  fimctions.  For  properties 
of  such  functions  the  reader  is  referred  to  Thomson  and  Tait,  Natural  Philosophy, 
§§  499-519. 

[Note.  From  the  integrals  for  V  {r,  6,  (p)  involving  Legendre  functions  of  cos  ^i'  and 
of  cos  d,  cos  6'  respectively,  we  can  obtain  a  new  proof  of  the  addition  theorem  for  the 
Legendre  polynomial. 

For  let 

Xn  {ff,  0')  -  P„  (cos  ^i')  -  IPn  (cos  0)  Pn  (cOS  d') 

+  22    ^/*  ~ '"? ;  Pn'"  (cos  6)  iV"  (cos  ff)  COS  m  (<i  -  (b')\  , 

25—2 


388  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP,  XVIII 

and  we  get,  on  comparing  the  two  formulae  for  V{r,  0,  (p), 

J  -TT  J  0  n  =  0  \"'/ 

If  we  take  f{ff,  0')  to  be  a  surface  harmonic  of  degree  n,  the  term  involving  ?•"  is  the  only 
one  which  occurs  in  the  integrated  series  ;  and  in  particular,  if  we  take/(^',  0')  =  _;(„  {6',  0'), 
we  get 

fl„  jl  ^^»  ^^''  '^')^'^'"  o'de'dcj>'=o. 

Since  the  integrand   is  continuous   and   is   not   negative   it   must  be   zero;    and    so 
Xn  {&',  4>')  =  ^>  that  is  to  say  we  have  proved  the  formula 

Pn  (cos  0^')  =  Pn  (cos  6)  Pn  (cOS  6')  +  =l     2  ,'  P,,"*  (COS  6)  P^T  (cOS  6')  COS  m  ((/)  -  </)'), 

wherein  it  is  obvious  that 

cos  $1  —  cos  6  cos  ^'  +  sin  ^  sin  6'  cos  {(f>  —  (f)'), 

from  geometrical  considerations. 

We  have  thus  obtained  a  physical  proof  of  a  theorem  proved  elsewhere*  (§  15-7)  by 
purely  analytical  reasoning.] 

Example  1.     Find  the  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  analytic  inside  the  sphere  r=l 
which  has  the  value  sin  3^  cos  (p  at  the  surface  of  the  sphere. 

[~^r^Ps^  (cos  6)  cos  (f)  -  ^rP^^  (cos  6)  cos  0.] 

Example  2.      Let  /„  (r,   d,  (f))  be  equal  to  a  homogeneous  polynomial  of  degree  n 
in  X,  i/,  z.     Shew  that 

I    fn  (a,  6,  (f))  Pn  {cos  0  cos  ^'+sin  6  sin  6'  cos  (0  -  0')}  a^  sin  6ddd(p 

-T    J    0 

4na^ 
=  2^1-^«^'''^''^^- 
[Take  the  direction  (d',  0')  as  a  new  polar  axis.] 

18'5.     Solutions  of  Laplace's  equation  which  involve  Bessel  coefficients. 
A  particular  case  of  the  result  of  §  18"3  is  that 


is  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation,  k  being  any  constant  and  m  being  any 
integer. 

Taking  cylindrical-polar  coordinates  (p,  </>,  z)  defined  by  the  equations 

X  =  p  cos  (/),     y  =  p  sin  0, 

the  above  solution  becomes 

kz    I  ik  p  con  (u- (i>)  7  kz   I  ikpcosv  /       ,      i\       7 

'      e  '^      ^       '  cos  maau=  e  e  cos  m  {v  +  (p) .  dv 


ct  kz  i       ikp  cos  J'  I    7 

=  ze     /    6  cos  mv  COS)  ncpdv 

J  0 

o   /t'^  /        I  \    /         ?/rpcos  I'  7 

=  ie    cos  (m<p)       e  cos  7Hvay, 

Jo 


*  The  absence  of  the  factor  (  - )'»  which  occurs  in  §  15-7  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  functions 
now  employed  are  Ferrers'  associated  functions. 


18-5,  18-51]  THE  EQUATIONS  OF   MATHEMATICAL   PHYSICS  389 

and  so,  using  §  171  example  3,  we  see  that  2'iri^"' ^'^  cos  (m<l>) .  Jm  (kp)  is  a 
solution  of  Laplace's  equation  analytic  near  the  origin. 

Similarly,  from  the  expression 

r     gk  iz+ixcosu+iysinu)  gj^  mudu, 

J    -ir 

where  m  is  an  integer,  we  deduce  that  27ri"*  e*^  sin  (m^) .  Jm  {kp)  is  a  solution 
of  Laplace  s  equation. 

18"51.     The  periods  of  vibration  of  a  uniform  memh'ane*. 

The  equation  satisfied  by  the  displacement  V  at  time  ^  of  a  point  {x,  y)  of  a  uniform 
plane  membrane  vibrating  harmonically  is 

827     dW_  1  dW 
dx^  ■*"  8^2  -  c'i  8^2  ' 

where  c  is  a  constant  depending  on  the  tension  and  density  of  the  membrane.  The 
equation  can  be  reduced  to  Laplace's  equation  by  the  change  of  variable  given  by  z  =  cti. 
It  follows,  from  §  18"5,  that  expressions  of  the  form 

T    n    \  '^OS       ,  cos     , 

satisfy  the  equation  of  motion  of  the  membrane. 

Take  as  a  particular  case  a  drum,  that  is  to  say  a  inembrane  with  a  fixed  circular 
boundary  of  radius  R. 

Then  one  possible  type  of  vibration  is  given  by  the  equation 

V=Jm  (kp)  cos  m(f)  cos  ckt, 

provided  that  F=0  when  p  =  R;  so  that  we  have  to  choose  k  to  satisfy  the  equation 

This  equation  to  determine  k  has  an  infinite  number  of  real  roots  (§  17 '3  example  3), 
^1,  ^2)  '^S)  •••  say.     A  possible  type  of  vibration  is  then  given  by 

F— /to  (^rp)cos??i(^  cos  c^^<.  (»•  =  !,  2,  3,  ...) 

This  is  a  periodic  motion  with  period  2Tr/{ckr) ;  and  so  the  calculation  of  the  periods 
depends  essentially  on  calculating  the  zeros  of  Bessel  coeflficients  (see  §  17 "9). 

Example.      The   equation   of  motion   of    air   in   a   circular  cylinder  vibrating  per- 
pendicularly to  the  axis  OZ  of  the  cylinder  is 

82  F     82  F_  1  82F 
dx^'^d^^~~c^W' 

V  denoting  the  velocity  potential.     If  the  cylinder  have  radius  R,  the  boundary  condition 

is  that  ^;— =  0  when  p  =  R.     Shew  that  the  determination  of  the  free  periods  depends  on 

finding  the  zeros  of  Jm  {0  =  ^- 

*  Poisson,  Mem.  de  V Academic,  viii.  ;  Bourget,  Ann.  de  I'Ecole  Normale,  in.     For  a  detailed 
discussion  of  vibrations  of  membranes,  see  also  llayleigh,  Theory  of  Sound,  Chapter  ix. 


390  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

18'6.     A  general  solution  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions. 

It  may  be  shewn*  by  the  methods  of  §  18"3  that  a  general  solution  of 
the  equation  of  wave  motions 

'ds^'^  dy^'^  dz^  ~  6'  dt^ 


IS 


V=j       I      f(xsmucosv  +  ysiD.usinv  +  zcosu  +  ct,u,v)dudv, 

J  —  n  J  —  7r 


where /is  a  function  (of  three  variables)  of  the  type  considered  in  §  18'3. 

Regarding  an  integral  as  a  limit  of  a  sum,  we  see  that  a  physical 
interpretation  of  this  equation  is  that  the  velocity  potential  V  is  produced 
by  a  number  of  plane  waves,  the  disturbance  represented  by  the  element 

f(x  sin u  cos V  +  y  sin u  sin v  +z  cos u  +  ct,  u,  v)  huhv 

being  propagated  in  the  direction  (sin  u  cos  v,  sin  u  sin  v,  cos  u)  with  velocity  c. 
The  solution  therefore  represents  an  aggregate  of  plane  waves  travelling  in 
all  directions  with  velocity  c. 

18"61.  Solutions  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions  which  involve  Bessel 
functions. 

We  shall  now  obtain  a  class  of  particular  solutions  of  the  equation  of 
wave  motions,  useful  for  the  solution  of  certain  special  problems. 

In  physical  investigations,  it  is  desirable  to  have  the  time  occurring  by 
means  of  a  factor  sin  ckt  or  cos  ckt,  where  k  is  constant.  This  suggests  that 
we  should  consider  solutions  of  the  type 

V=  i        I     gik  ('^  ^^^u  cosv-i- y  sin  u  sin  v+z  cos  u+ct)  f/^    v)  dudv 
J  -ttJ  0 

Physically  this  means  that  we  consider  motions  in  which  all  the  elementary  waves 
have  the  same  period. 

Now  let  the  polar  coordinates  of  (x,  y,  z)  be  (r,  d,  </>)  and  let  (cu,  ^\r)  be  the 
polar  coordinates  of  the  direction  {u,  v)  referred  to  new  axes  such  that 
the  polar  axis  is  the  direction  {6,  <^),  and  the  plane  -y^^Q  passes  through 
OZ;   so  that 

cos  ft)  =  COS  6  cos  w  +  sin  ^  sin  u  cos  (^  —  v), 
sin  w  sin  (^  —  v)  =  sin  tt>  sin  t/t. 

Also,  take  the  arbitrary  function /(w,  v)  to  be  8n{u,v)s\nu,  where  8^ 
denotes  a  surface  harmonic  in  u,  v  of  degree  n;   so  that  we  may  write 

S,Xu,  v)  =  Sn(0,<f>;  Q),  yjr), 
where  (§  18'31)  S^  is  a  surface  harmonic  in  co,  i/r  of  degree  n. 

*  See  the  paper  previously  cited,  3Iath.  Ann.  lvii.  pp.  342-345,  or  Messenger  of  Mathe- 
matics, XXXVI.  pp.  98-106. 


18*6-18-611]        THE  EQUATIONS  OF  MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS  391 

We  thus  get 

F=  B^^  r    r  e**^«'^"  S^  (0,  <f>;  0),  i/r)  sin  (cdcody^. 

.  J  -irJ  0 

Now  we  may  write  (§  18*31) 
S„  {6,  <j>;  co,ylr)  =  A,  (6,  cf>) .  P„  (cos  a>) 

+   S    {^n""*  (6,  <f>)  cos  my}r  +  £„<""  (^,  <^)  sin  myjr}  P^"*  (cos  w), 

OT=l 

where  A„  (0,  (j>),  ^„<»»>  {0,  (f>)  and  5„'"*>  (0,  <f>)  are  independent  of  i|r  and  «. 
Performing  the  integration  with  respect  to  i/r,  we  get 

V  =  27re'*^^  A,, (0,  <f>)  r  e'«^»-cos<-  p^  (cos  «)  sin  wc^w 
J  0 

=  27re'*'^^  J„ (^,  (/,)  j'  ^ e''^'^  P. (/.) df. 

=  2W*^^^„(^,  <^)/'/^''^'^  2^1^  (^^-ir^/*> 

by  Rodrigues'  formula  (§  15'11);  on  integrating  by  parts  n  times  and  using 
Hankel's  integral  (§  IT'S  corollary),  we  obtain  the  equation 

27r      ,...„,   .     _    „.  fi 


F  = 


;p^  e''^'  A,  {0,  0)  (iA;rr  j  ^  e^*'"'^  (1  -  ^Lt^f  d^l 


=  (27r)*  *•  V*'''  (A;r) " ^  /^^^  (^r)  J,  (^,  (^), 

and  so  F  is  a  constant  multiple  of  e''"'*^  r'^J       (kr)  A^ {0,  ^). 

Now  the  equation  of  wave  motions  is  unaffected  if  we  multiply  x,  y,  z 
and  t  by  the  same  constant  factor,  i.e.  if  we  multiply  r  and  t  by  the  same 
constant  factor  leaving  0  and  0  unaltered;  so  that  il„(^,  4>)  may  be  taken 
to  be  independent  of  the  arbitrary  constant  k  which  multiplies  r  and  t 

Hence  lim  e''''^* r      k~^~    J^     ,  (kr)  A „  (0,  cf))  is  a  solution  of  the  equation 

of  wave  motions;  and  therefore  r'^An(0,  (f))  is  a  solution  (independent  of  t) 
of  the  equation  of  wave  motions,  and  is  consequently  a  solution  of  Laplace's 
equation;  it  is,  accordingly,  permissible  to  take  A,^{0,  <^)  to  be  any  surface 
harmonic  of  degree  n ;  and  so  we  obtain  the  result  that 

r~^J     ,  (kr) P,r  (cos  0)  ^°^  m6  ^°^  ckt 

n  +  l^     >    ''    ^         ^  sm     ^  sin 

is  a  particular  solution  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions. 

18'611.     Application  of  §  18"61  to  a  physical  problem. 

The  solution  just  obtained  for  the  equation  of  wave  motions  may  be  used  in  the 
following  manner  to  determine  the  periods  of  free  vibration  of  air  contained  in  a  rigid 
sphere. 


392  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

The  velocity  potential   V  satisfies  the  equation  of  wave  motions  and  the  boundary 

dV 
condition  is  that   -=r-  =  0  when  r  =  a,  where  a  is  the  radius  of  the  sphere.     Hence 

a?' 

V=  r'^J  ,.  ikr)  P,™  (cos  6)  ^^^  md)  ^^^  ckt 
'H-i  \    '     1^    \         ^  sin     ^  sin 

gives  a  possible  motion  if  k  is  so  chosen  that 

This  equation  determines  k ;  on  using  §  17*24,  we  see  that  it  may  be  written  in 
the  form 

tan^a=/„(^a), 

where  /„  {ka)  is  a  rational  function  of  ka. 

In  particular  the  radial  vibrations,  in  which  V  is  independent  of  6  and  0,  are  given  by 
taking  n  =  0;  then  the  equation  to  determine  k  becomes  simply 

tan  ka  =  ka ; 

and  the  pitches  of  the  fundamental  radial  vibrations  correspond  to  the   roots  of  this 
equation. 


REFERENCES. 

J.  Fourier,  Theorie  Analytique  de  la  Chaleur.     (Translated  by  A.  Freeman.) 

W.  Thomson  and  P.  G.  Tait,  Natural  Philosophy. 

Lord  Rayleigh,   Theory  of  Sound. 

F.  PocKELS,   ilber  die  partielle  Differentialgleichtmg  Am  +  Fm  =  0.     (Leipzig,  1891.) 

H.  BuRKHARDT,  EntivickeluTigen  nach  oscillirenden  Funktionen.     (Leipzig,  1908.) 

H.  Bateman,  Electrical  and  Optical    Wave-motion. 

E.  T.  Whittaker,  History  of  the  Theories  of  Aether  and  Electricity. 

A.  E.  IT.  Love,  Proc.  London  Math.  Sac.  xxx.  pp.  308-.321. 

H.  Bateman,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  (2)  i.  pp.  451-458. 

L.  N.  G.  Filon,  Philosophical  Magazine  (6)  vi.'  (1903),  pp.  193-213. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  If  V  be  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  which  is  symmetrical  with  respect  to  OZ, 
and  if  V=f{z]  on  OZ,  shew  that  if /{t}  be  a  function  which  is  analytic  for  a  suitable 
range  of  values  of  the  complex  variable  ^,  then 

1    /""" 
V=-        f{z  +  i  (.v-  +  y-f  cos  (j)]  d(f) 
'"'Jo' 

at  any  point  of  a  certain  three-dimensional  region. 


THE   EQUATIONS   OF   MATHEMATICAL   PHYSICS  393 

2.     Deduce  from  example  1  that  the  potential  of  a  uniform  circular  ring  of  radius  c 
and  of  mass  M  lying  in  the  plane  XO  Y  with  its  centre  at  the  origin  is 


^n-  -  *  r  [cii  +  {a  + 1  {x'-  +/)i  cos  c/)}*]"*  di\>. 

J  0 


3.  If  u  be  determined  as  a  function  of  x,  y  and  z  by  means  of  the  equation 

Ax-\-By-\-Cz  =  \, 
where  A,  B,  C  are  functions  of  u  such  that 

A^-VB^  +  C^  =  0, 

shew  that  (subject  to  certain  general  conditions)  any  function  of  u  is  a  solution   of 
Laplace's  equation. 

(Forsyth,  Messenger  of  Mathematics,  xxvii.) 

4.  A,  B  are  two  points  outside  a  sphere  whose  centi'e  is  C.  A  layer  of  attracting 
matter  on  the  surface  of  the  sphere  is  such  that  its  surface  density  o-p  at  P  is  given  by 
the  formula 

o-pQC  {AP.BP)-K 

Shew  that  the  total  quantity  of  matter  is  unaffected  by  varying  A  and  B  so  long  as 
CA  .  CB  and  ACB  are  unaltered  ;  and  prove  that  this  result  is  equivalent  to  the  theorem 
that  the  surface  integral  of  two  harmonics  of  different  degrees  taken  over  the  sphere 
is  zero. 

(Sylvester.) 

5.  Let  V{x,  y,  z)  be  the  potential  function  defined  analytically  as  due  to  particles 
of  masses  X  +  i'/x,  X  —  ifi  at  the  points  {a  +  ia',  b  +  ib',  c  +  ic')  and  {a  —  ia,  b  —  ib',  c-ic') 
respectively.  Shew  that  V {x,  y,  z)  is  infinite  at  all  points  of  a  certain  real  circle,  and 
if  the  point  {x,  y,  z)  describes  a  circuit  intertwined  once  with  this  circle  the  initial  and 
final  values  of  V  (x,  y,  z)  are  numerically  equal,  but  opposite  in  sign. 

(Appell.) 

6.  Find  the  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  analytic  in  the  region  for  which  a<r<A, 
it  being  given  that  on  the  spheres  r  =  a  and  r=A  the  solution  reduces  to 

2  c„A(cos<9),        2  C„P„  (cos  <9), 

n=o  M=0 

respectively. 

7.  Let  0'  have  coordinates  (0,  0,  c),  and  let 

Pdz=d,     P(yZ=6',     PO  =  r,     PO'^r'. 

Shew  that 

Pn  (cos  6')  ^  P,^(co^)  ,  1 N  c^«+jt  (cos_^)      (n  +  l)(7t  +  2)  c^Pn^^  (cos^)  , 

_  (_}_  rP,  icosj)      (n  +  l)  (,^+2)  r^-P,  {cos  0) 

according  as  r>c  or  r<.c. 

Obtain  a  similar  expansion  for  r'"/*,/ (cos  ^).  (Trinitj',  1893.) 

8.  At  a  point  (r,  0,  (f))  outside  a  uniform  oblate  spheroid  whose  semi-axes  are  a,  b  and 
whose  density  is  p,  shew  that  the  potential  is 


4n  pa'^b 


'  1        m'    p.,  (cos  6)       ?>i^    P^  (cos  i 
3r      3.5         /••'  5.7         ?"^ 


where  m-=a'^  —  b^  and  r>m.     Obtain  the  potential  at  points  for  which  r<m. 

(St  John's,  1899.) 


394  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

9.     Shew  that 

gir  cose_   2  i™  (277)*  {2n  + 1)  r"*  P„  (cos  6)  J„,.  (r). 

n=0  * 

(Bauer,  Crelle,  LVi.) 

10*.     Shew  that  ]i  x±iy=h  cosh  (| ± ?■»;),  the  equation  of  two-dimensional  wave  motions 

in  the  coordinates  |  and  77  is 

927     927     ^2  927 

-9|2+s,-F=^(«o«h2^-cos^)-g^. 

(Lame.) 

11.  Let  x=-{c  +  r COS. 6)  cos (l>,     1/ =  {c  +  r cos 6) sin (f),    z=rsm6; 

shew  that  the  surfaces  for  which  r,  d,  <b  respectively  are  constant  form  an  orthogonal 
system ;  and  shew  that  Laplace's  equation  in  the  coordinates  r,  6,  (p  is 

g-|r(c+rcos^)g^|  +  -^g^|(c  +  rcos^)g^^+^-p^:^^g^  =  0. 

(W.  D.  Niven.) 

12.  Let  P  have  Cartesian  coordinates  {x,  y,  z)  and  polar  coordinates  (r,  6,  0).     Let 
the  plane  F 02  meet  the  circle  ;2;2-|-?/2=X-2,  2  =  0  in  the  points  a,  y  ;  and  let 

A 

aPy  =  <u,     log  {PajPy)  =  o". 
Shew  that  Laplace's  equation  in  the  coordinates  a;  <b,  (f)  is 

B    f       sinh  a-        d  V\       d   (       sinho-        dV]      1 ^-n- 

30-  \cosh  o-  —  cos  (i)  da-  j       Bat  (cosh  a  —  cos  to  Ceo  J       sinh  o-  (cosh  cr  —  cos  «)  8<^^       ' 


F=  (cosh  a  —  cos  co)  cos  7i(o  cos  m0  P"''_   (cosh  a). 


and  shew  that  a  solution  is 

ish  a-  —  cos  ft))  C( 

(Hicks,  PAi7.  Trans.  CLXXii.  p.  617  et  seq.) 

13.  Shew  that 

(ii;2^.p2_27?pcos0  +  c2)-i=    2 dk  /      e-"" J^ (kp)  6'^^'°''' cos  mudu, 

and  deduce  an  expression  for  the  potential  of  a  particle  in  terms  of  Bessel  functions. 

14.  Shew  that  if  a,  b,  c  are  constants  and  X,  n,  v  are  confocal  coordinates,  defined  as 
the  roots  of  the  equation  in  e 

.*'2  «2  ^2 

a-  +  e      b^+f      c^  +  f 
then  Laplace's  equation  may  be  written 

where  A^  =  {a^  +  X)^  (b^  +  X)^  {c''-  +  \)K 

(Lame.) 

Examples  10,  11,  12  and  14  are  most  easily  proved  by  using  Lamp's  result  (Journal  de 
VEcole  Polyt.  xiv.)  that  if  (X,  /x,  v)  be  orthogonal  coordinates  for  which  the  line-element  is  given 
by  the  formula  {Sx)^  +  (5ij)^+{5z)^  =  {Hid\y^  +  (H25ny^  +  lH3Sv)'^,  Laplace's  equation  in  these 
coordinates  is 

A  /^Ha  dV\,'d_  (HsH^  dV\      _a_  fH.H^  SV\_(. 

d\\    Hi      d\J^bfx\    Ho      OfMj'^d.^y    Hs     dvj       • 

A  simple  method  (due  to  W.  Thomson,  Camh.  Math.  Journal,  iv.)  of  proving  this  result  is 
reproduced  by  Lamb,  H^jdrodynamics  (1906),  p.  141. 


THE   EQUATIONS   OF  MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS  895 

15.  Shew  that  a  general  solution  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions  is 

V=  j      F(xGoa6+yBin6-\-iz,  ^+izH'm  d+ct  COB  0,  6)  dd. 

(Bateman.) 

16.  If  U=f{x,  1/,  z,  t)he  &  solution  of 

a*  dt      8^-2  "'■  df  "^  dz'^  ' 
prove  that  another  solution  of  the  equation  is 

^='-v(?'f'-:'-7)-K-^-'^> 

17.  Shew  that  a  general  solution  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions,  when  the  motion  is 
independent  of  ^,  is 

I      f{z-\-ip  COS  6,  ct+p  sin  6)  dd 

+  /     /       arc  smh  ( ^V—; F(a,  6)  dOda, 

where  p,  cf),  z  are  cylindrical  coordinates  and  a,  b  are  arbitrary  constants. 

(Bateman.) 

18.  If  V=f{x,  y,  z)  is  a  solution  of  Laplace's  equation,  shew  that 

1         ./r^-aP-  r^-\-d?-  az   \ 

{x  —  iy)^     \^{x-iy)     2i{x  —  iy)     x  —  iyj 
is  another  solution.  (Bateman.) 

19.  If  U'=f(x,  y,  z,  t)  is  a  solution  of  the  equation  of  wave  motions,  shew  that 
another  solution  is 


1        /   X  y  r^- 1  r^  +  l    \ 

~ z-cr\z-ct''   z-ct'    2{z-ct)'    2c{z-ct))' 


(Bateman.) 


20.     If  l=x  —  iy,     7n  =  z  +  iw,     n=^x^+y^  +  z^  +  ^v^, 

\=x  +  ty,     p.  =  z-iw,     v=-l, 

so  that  l\+7np.  +  nv=0, 

shew  that  any  homogeneous  solution,  of  degree  zero,  of 

dH7     dHJ     d'^U     (>'^U_Q 
dx"^       dy'^       dz'^       dvP' 

d'^U       d'^U        d'-U     ^ 
satisnes  ;rj^^  +  ~ — --  +  ^  >"  =  ^  j 

oloX      dm  Op.     oncv 

and  obtain  a  solution  of  this  equation  in  the  form 

ia,     h,     c        \ 
«,    i3,    y,    c[, 

where  ZX  =  (6-c)  (f-a),     7np  =  {c-a){(-b),    nv  =  {a-b){C-c). 

(Bateman,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  (2)  vii.) 


<J96  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XVIII 

21*.     If  (r,  0,  cf))  are  spheroidal  coordinates,  defined  by  the  equations 

x=c(r^  +  lfsmd  cos(f),    y=c  {r^ +  lf  sin  0  sin  cf),     z=crcos6, 

where  x,  y,  z  are  rectangular  coordinates  and  c  is  a  constant,  shew  that,  when  n  and  m  are 
integers, 

/■f    „   f  xcost  +  y  sin  t+iz\  cos     ^  ,      _,    (n  — m)!  „,„,.>  „  ™  /        /,\  cos      , 
/       Pn[  ^^ ^'— )    .     mtdt  =  ^iT\ (- P^'"  (zr)  Pn™  (cos  (9)    .    md). 

(Blades,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  xxxiii.) 

22.     With  the  notation  of  example  21,  shew  that,  if  2=t=0, 

l"    Q,,  A-co^^+y^in^+M  cos  (^^-m^  ^^^      cos  ^ 

j  _,r        V  c  /  sm  (?i.  +  m)  !  ^"    v    ;     n    v         '' sin      ^ 

(Jeffery.) 

*  The  functions  introduced  in   examples   21   and  22  are   known  as  internal  and  external 
spheroidal  harmonics  respectively. 


CHAPTER  XIX 


MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS 

19*1.     The  differential  equation  of  Mathieu. 

The  preceding  five  chapters  have  been  occupied  with  the,  discussion  of 
functions  which  belong  to  what  may  be  generally  described  as  the  hyper- 
geometric  type,  and  many  simple  properties  of  these  functions  are  now  well 
known. 

In  the  present  chapter  we  enter  upon  a  region  of  Analysis  which  lies 
beyond  this,  and  which  is,  as  yet,  only  very  imperfectly  explored. 

The  functions  which  occur  in  Mathematical  Physics  and  which  come 
next  in  order  of  complication  to  functions  of  hypergeometric  type  are 
called  Mathieu  functions ;  these  functions  are  also  known  as  the  functions 
associated  with  the  elliptic  cylinder.  They  arise  from  the  equation  of  two- 
dimensional  wave  motion,  namely 

dx^       dy"^       c-  df^ 

This  partial  differential  equation  occurs  in  the  theory  of  the  propagation  of  electro- 
magnetic waves  ;  if  the  electric  vector  in  the  wave-front  is  parallel  to  OZ  and  if  E  denotes 
the  electric  force,  while  {H^,  Hy,  0)  are  the  components  of  magnetic  force.  Maxwell's 
fundamental  equations  are 

}_dE^_dHy_dff^      dH^__dE      dHy_dE 
c^  dt        dx        cy  '       ct  8y  '       3«   ~  3a; ' 

c  denoting  the  velocity  of  light  ;  and  these  equations  give  at  once 

C^    Ct'^  ex-         C'tf'  ' 

In  the  case  of  the  scattering  of  waves,  propagated  parallel  to  OX,  incident  on  an 
elliptic  cylinder  for  which  OX  and  OY  are  axes  of  a  principal  section,  the  boundary 
condition  is  that  E  should  vanisli  at  the  surface  of  the  cyliuder. 

The  same  partial  differential  equation  occurs  in  connexion  with  the  vibrations  of 
a  uniform  i)lane  membrane,  the  dependent  variable  being  the  displacement  perpendicular 
to  the  membrane ;  if  the  membrane  be  in  the  shape  of  an  ellipse  with  a  rigid  boundary, 
the  boundary  condition  is  the  same  as  in  the  electromagnetic  problem  just  discussed. 


398  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

The  differential  equation  was  discussed  by  Mathieu*  in  1868  in  connexion 
with  the  problem  of  vibrations  of  an  elliptic  membrane  in  the  following 
manner : 

Suppose  that  the  membrane,  in  the  plane  XOY,  is  vibrating  with 
frequency^.     Then  writing  V=u(x,  y)cos{pt  +  €),  the  equation  becomes 

d-u     d^u     p"     _ 

Let  the  foci  of  the  elliptic  membrane  be  (+  A,  0,  0),  and  introduce  new 
real  variables  f  f,  t]  defined  by  the  complex  equation 

x-\-iy  =  h  cosh  {^  +  i-q), 

so  that  x  =  h  cosh  ^  cos  r),     y  =  h  sinh  ^  sin  97. 

The  curves,  on  which  ^  or  77  is  constant,  are  evidently  ellipses  or  hyper- 
bolas confocal  with  the  boundary ;  if  we  take  ^  ^  0  and  —  tt  <  77  <  tt,  to  each 
point  {x,  y,  0)  of  the  plane  corresponds  one  and  only  one:}:  value  of  (^,  rf). 

The  differential  equation  for  u  transforms  into§ 

P  +  0  +  -*y(cosh'|-cos',)»  =  O. 
If  we  assume  a  solution  of  this  equation  of  the  form 

where  the  factors  are  functions  of  ^  only  and  of  77  only  respectively,  we  see 
that 

Since  the  left-hand  side  contains  f  but  not  77,  while  the  right-hand  side 
contains  77  but  not  ^,  F(^)  and  6^(77)  must  be  such  that  each  side  is  a  constant, 
A,  say,  since  f  and  77  are  independent  variables. 

We  thus  arrive  at  the  equations 


drj'' 


-(-^cos^V-A)g(v)  =  0. 


*  Liouville^s  Journal,  ser.  2,  t.  xiii.  p.  137. 

t  The  introduction  of  these  variables  is  due  to  Lam(^,  who  called  f  the  thermometric  ])ara- 
meter.  They  are  more  usually  known  as  confocal  coordinates.  See  Lam^,  Sur  les  fonctions 
inverses  des  transcendantes,  lere  Lecjon. 

J  This  may  be  seen  most  easily  by  considering  the  ellipses  obtained  by  giving  f  various 
positive  values.  If  the  elUpse  be  drawn  through  a  definite  point  (f,  rj)  of  the  plane,  7?  is  the 
eccentric  angle  of  that  point  on  the  ellipse. 

§   A  proof  of  this  result,  due  to  Lame,  is  given  in  numerous  text-books ;  see  p.  394,  footnote. 


1911,  1912]  '■^  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  399 

By  a  slight  change  of  independent  variable  in  the  former  equation,  v/e  see 
that  both  of  these  equatimis  are  linear  differential  equations,  of  the  second 

order,  of  the  form 

d^u 

-T-j  +  (a  +  IQq  cos  2z)  w  =  0, 

where  a  and  q  are  constants*.     It  is  obvious  that  every  point  (infinity  ex- 
cepted) is  a  regular  point  of  this  equation. 

This  is  the  equation  which  is  known  as  Mathieu's  equation  and,  in  certain 
circumstances  (§  19'2),  particular  solutions  of  it  are  called  Mathieu  fvmctions. 

19  "11.     The  form  of  the  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation. 

In  the  physical  problems  which  suggested  Mathieu's  equation,  the  constant 
a  is  not  given  a  priori,  and  we  have  to  consider  how  it  is  to  be  determined. 
It  is  obvious  from  physical  considerations  in  the  problem  of  the  membrane 
that  u{x,  y)  is  a  one-valued  function  of  position,  and  is  consequently  unaltered 
by  increasing  77  by  27r ;  and  the  conditionf  G(7}  +  27r)  =  G  (97)  is  sufficient  to 
determine  a  set  of  values  of  a  in  terms  of  q.  And  it  will  appear  later  (§§  19'4, 
19*41)  that,  when  a  has  not  one  of  these  values,  the  equation 

G{r}  +  2'7r)  =  G{v) 
is  no  longer  true. 

When  a  is  thus  determined,  q  (and  thence  p)  is  determined  by  the  fact 
that  F{^)  =  0  on  the  boundary;  and  so  the  periods  of  the  free  vibrations  of 
the  membrane  are  obtained. 

Other  problems  of  Mathematical  Physics  which  involve  Mathieu  functions  in  their 
solution  are  (i)  Tidal  waves  in  a  cylindrical  vessel  with  an  elliptic  boundary,  (ii)  Certain 
forms  of  steady  vortex  motion  in  an  elliptic  cylinder,  (,iii)  The  decay  of  magnetic  force  in 
a  metal  cylinder  J.  The  equation  also  occurs  in  a  problem  of  Rigid  Dynamics  which 
is  of  general  interest  §. 

1912.     HiWs  equation. 

A  differential  equation,  similar  to  Mathieu's  but  of  a  more  general  nature, 
arises  in  G.  W.  Hill's  ||  method  of  determining  the  motion  of  the  Lunar 
Perigee,  and  in  Adams' IT  determination  of  the  motion  of  the  Lunar  Node. 
Hill's  equation  is 

d'hi 
dz' 


+  ($0  +  2  ^  On  cos  27iz\  u  =  0. 


*  Their  actual  values  are  a  — A-  h^p^l(2c^),  q  =  h'^2^"l{32c^)  ;  the  factor  16  is  inserted  to  avoid 
powers  of  2  in  the  solution. 

t  An  elementary  analogue  of  this  result  is  that  a  solution  of  -^  +au  —  0  has  period  27r  if,  and 
only  if,  a  is  the  square  of  an  integer. 

X  li.  C.  Maclaurin,  Trans.  Camb.  Phil.  Soc.  xvii.  p.  41. 

§  A.  W.  Young,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  xxxii.  p.  81. 

Ii  Acta  Mathematica,  viii.  (1886).  Hill's  memoir  was  originally  published  in  1877  at 
Cambridge,  U.S.A. 

11  Monthly  Notices  R.  A.  S.  xxxviii.  p.  43. 


400  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

The  theory  of  Hill's  equation  is  very  similar  to  that  of  Mathieu's  (in  spite 
of  the  increase  in  generality  due  to  the  presence  of  the  infinite  series),  so  the 
two  equations  will,  to  some  extent,  be  considered  together. 

In  the  astronomical  applications  6q,  6^,  ...  are  known  constants,  so  the 
problem  of  choosing  them  in  such  a  way  that  the  solution  may  be  periodic 
does  not  arise.  The  solution  of  Hill's  equation  in  the  Lunar  Theory  is,  in 
fact,  not  periodic. 

19'2.     Periodic  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation. 

We  have  seen  that  in  physical  (as  distinguished  from  astronomical) 
problems  the  constant  a  in  Mathieu's  equation  has  to  be  chosen  to  be  such 
a  function  of  q  that  the  equation  possesses  a  periodic  solution. 

Let  this  solution  be  G  {z) ;  then  G  {z),  in  addition  to  being  periodic,  is  an 
integral  function  of  z.  Three  possibilities  arise  as  to  the  nature  of  G  (z) : 
(i)  G  (z)  may  be  an  even  function  of  z,  (ii)  G  (z)  may  be  an  odd  function  of  z, 
(iii)  G  (z)  may  be  neither  even  nor  odd. 

In  case  (iii),  ^  [Gr  {^)  +  Gr  (— z)} 

is  an  even  periodic  solution  and 

^\G{z)-G(-z)} 

is  an  odd  periodic  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation,  these  two  solutions  forming 
a  fundamental  system.  It  is  therefore  sufficient  to  confine  our  attention  to 
periodic  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation  which  are  either  even  or  odd.  These 
solutions,  and.  these  only,  will  be  called  Mathieu  functions. 

It  will  be  observed  that,  since  the  roots  of  the  indicia!  equation  at  2  =  0  are  0  and  1, 
two  even  (or  two  odd)  periodic  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation  cannot  form  a  fundamental 
system.  But,  so  far,  there  seems  to  be  no  reason  why  Mathieu's  equation,  for  special 
values  of  a  and  q,  should  not  have  one  even  and  one  odd  periodic  solution  ;  for  com- 
paratively small  values  of  \  q  \  it  can  be  seen  [§  19-3  example  2,  (ii)  and  (iii)]  that 
Mathieu's  equation  has  two  periodic  solutions  only  in  the  trivial  case  in  which  q  —  0;  but 
for  larger  values  oi  \q\  there  may  be  pairs  of  periodic  solutions,  though  no  such  pairs 
have,  as  yet,  been  discovered. 

19'21.     An  integyxil  equation  satisfied  by  even  Mathieu  functions* . 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  if  G  (77)  is  any  even  Mathieu  function,  then 
G  (r])  satisfies  the  homogeneous  integral  equation 


J    —IT 


where   k  =  \J{^2q).     This  result  is  suggested  by   the   solution   of  Laplace's 
equation  given  in  §  18"3. 

*  This  integral  equation  and  the  expansions  of  §  19-3  were  published  by  Whittaker,  Proc. 
Int.  Congress  of  Math.  1912.  The  integral  equation  was  known  to  him  as  early  as  1904,  see 
'Trans.  Cavih.  Phil.  Sac.  xxr.  p.  193. 


19-2-19-22]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  401 

For,  if  x+  iy  =  h  cosh  (|  +  ir])  and  if  F(^)  and  0  (rj)  are  solutions  of  the 
differential  equations 

^^  -(A  +  m^h^  cosh«  ^)F(^)  =  0, 

_^^  +  (^  +  ^.;,.  cos^  ^)  (r  (v)  =  0, 

then,  by  §  19-1,  F(^)  G  (v)  e"*'^  is  a  particular  solution  of  Laplace's  equation. 
If  this  solution  is  a  special  case  of  the  general  solution 

I     f(h  cosh  ^  cos  r)Cosd  +  h  sinh  ^  sin  ?;  sin  ^  + 1^;,  0)  dO, 

•I     —IT 

given  in  §  18-3,  it  is  natural  to  expect  that* 

where  j>  (0)  is  a  function  of  0  to  be  determined.     Thus 
F  (f )  G  (7})  e^i'  =  r   F{0)  (f>  (6)  exp  [mh  cosh  ^  cos  v  cos  ^ 

J    — TT 

+  7yi^  sinh  |  sin  ?;  sin  ^  +  miz]  dd. 

Since  |  and  77  are  independent,  we  may  put  ^  =  0 ;  and  we  are  thus  led  to 
consider  the  possibility  of  Mathieu's  equation  possessing  a  solution  of  the 
form 

G(7))=  I      e™^°°«''^°««  (P  (d)  dd. 

J     —TT 

19-22.     Proof  that  the  even  Mathieu  functions  satisfy  the  integral  equation. 

It  is  readily  verified  (§  5-31)  that,  if  0  {d)  be  analytic  in  the  range  (-  tt,  tt) 
and  if  G^  (77)  be  defined  by  the  equation 

G  (77)  =  I         e^w'^cosrjcose  ^  (^Q^  fi0^ 

then  G  (77)  is  an  even  periodic  integral  function  of  77  and 

d'G  (ri)      ,  ,  ,  _ 

-^H^  +  {A+  nfh-  cos^  77)  G  (v) 

=  I       [m'/i-  (sin2  77  cos"-^  0  +  cos'-'  77)  -  mh  cos  77  cos  ^  +  ^}  g'"'* cos,, cose  ^  (^^  ^^c^ 

=  -    |m/i  sin  6  cos  'r](f)(6)+  ^'  {6)]  g^A cos,, cose  | 

L  J-TT 

+  I       {</)"  (^)  +  ( J  +  m^/i^  cos-  0)  0  (6')}  e'«/'^°«')cose  ^iq^ 

J    —TT 

on  integrating  by  parts. 


*  The  constant  i^(0)  is  inserted  to  simplify  the  algebra. 
W.    M.    A.  26 


402  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

But  if  (f>  (6)  be  a  -periodic  function  (with  period  27r)  such  that 

0"  ($)  +  (A+  m'h'  cos^  6)  </>  (6)  =  0, 

both  the  integral  and  the  integrated  part  vanish ;  that  is  to  say,  G  {-q),  defined 
by  the  integral,  is  a  periodic  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation. 

Consequently  G  (r))  is  an  even  periodic  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation  if 
<j)  {0)  is  a  periodic  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation  formed  with  the  same  con- 
stants ;  and  therefore  <p  (^)  is  a  constant  multiple  of  G  (6) ;  let  it  be  \G  (6). 

[In  the  case  when  the  Mathieu  equation  has  two  periodic  solutions,  if  this  case  exist, 
we  have  (p  {0)  =  }<&  (6)  +  Oi  (6)  where  (rj  (6)  is  an  odd  periodic  function  ;  but 

vanishes,  so  the  subsequent  work  is  unaffected.] 

If  we  take  a  and  q  as  the  parameters  of  the  Mathieu  equation  instead  of 
A  and  mh,  it  is  obvious  that  mh  —  \J{'.i2q)  =  k. 

We  have  thus  proved  that,  if  G{r^)  be  an  even  periodic  solution  of 
Mathieu's  equation,  then 

G{'n)^\  r    e^^^^^^''^^  G{d)de, 

J     -TT 

which  is  the  result  stated  in  §  19'21. 

From  I  11  •23,  it  is  known  that  this  integral  equation  has  a  solution  only 
when  \  has  one  of  the  '  characteristic  values.'  It  will  be  shewn  in  §  19'3  that 
for  such  values  of  A,,  the  integral  equation  affords  a  simple  means  of  con- 
structing the  even  Mathieu  functions. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  the  odd  Mathieu  functions  satisfy  the  integral  equation 


G{r])  =  X  j      sin  (/•  sin  rjHm6)G(d)  d6. 


Example  2.     Shew  that  both  the  even  and  the  odd  Mathieu  functions  satisfy  the 
integral  equation 


G{r^)  =  \i"   e'''^''''>^'''^G{d)dd. 


Example  3.     Shew  that  when  the  eccentricity  of  the  fundamental  ellipse  tends  to  zero, 
the  confluent  form  of  the  integral  equation  for  the  even  Mathieu  functions  is 


J,,  {j;)  =~  I"   e'^  ^o**  ^  cos  n6  dd. 


19"3.     The  construction  of  Mathieu  functions. 

We  shall  now  make  use  of  the  integral  equation  of  §  19"21  to  construct 
Mathieu  functions;  the  canonical  form  of  Mathieu's  equation  will  be  taken  as 

d-u  ^  ^,  _,  ^ 

-r-:,  +  [a  +  Ibq  COS  2z)  u  =  0. 


19-3]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  403 

In  the  special  case  when  q  is  zero,  the  periodic  solutions  are  obtained  by 
taking  a  -  ti^,  where  n  is  any  integer;  the  solutions  are  then 

1,      cos  Z',      cos  23',  ..., 

sin  z,     sin  2z,  .... 
The  Mathieu  functions,  which  reduce  to  these  when  ^  -^  0,  will  be  called 
ceo {z,  q),     cei  {z,  q),     ce^ (z,  q),  ..., 
se^{z,  q),     se^iz,  q),  .... 
To  make  the  functions  precise,  we  take  the  coefficients  of  cos  nz  and  sin  nz 
in  the  respective  Fourier  series  for  ce„  (z,  q)  and  sen  {z,  q)  to  be  unity.     The 
functions  cen{z,  q),  sen{z,  q)  will  be  called  Mathieu  fanctions  of  order  n. 
Let  us  now  construct  ce^  (z,  q). 

Since  ceo(^,  0)  =  1,  we  see  that  X-^(27r)~^  as  ^-^0.  Accordingly  we 
suppose  that,  for  general  values  of  q,  the  characteristic  value  of  X  which  gives 
rise  to  ce^  {z,  q)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

(27rX)-i  =l+G,q+a,q''  +  ..., 
and  that  ceo  {z,  q)  =  l+  q^^  {z)  +  q^^o_{z)  +  ..., 

where  a^,  a^,  ...  are  numerical  constants  and  iS-^{z),  ^^{z),  ...  are  periodic 
functions  of  z  which  are  independent  of  q  and  which  contain  no  constant 
term. 

On  substituting  in  the  integral  equation,  we  find  that 

{l  +  a,q  +  a,q'+...)[l-^q^,{z)  +  f^,{z)-\-...] 

1  r 

=  ^\      {1  +  \/(325) .  cos  ^  cos  ^  +  lQqGo^^zcos''6  +  ...] 

X  [i  +  q^,{d)-^f^,{d)  +  ...]de. 

Equating  coefficients  of  successive  powers  of  q  in  this  result  and  making 
use  of  the  fact  that  /3i  {z),  ^^  {z),  . . .  contain  no  constant  term,  we  find  in 
succession 

a^  =  4,  /?!  {z)  =  4  cos  2z, 

02  =  14,         /32  {z)  =  2  cos  4^, 


and  we  thus  obtain  the  following  expansion : 

/       N      -,      (a       oo  ,     2^29    .  \        ^       /^  ,     160    ,         \ 

ce^{z,  q)  =  l  +  [^q  -  2,%q^ -^ ——-  q' -  ...jcos2z+  i2q--~^q'+  ...j  cos  4^ 

+  (-^q^  -  -w-  q"^  +  . . .]  cos  Gz  +  ( |o?^-  •••)  cos  8^ 

/"   1  '^ 


,225 

the  terms  not  written  down  being  0  (r/)  as  q  ^0. 

910  29 
The  value  of  a  is  -32g-+2245*-      '      q*'  +  0{q^);   it  will  be  observed 

that  the  coefficient  of  cos  2z  in  the  series  for  cBq  (z,  q)  is  —  a/(Sq). 

26—2 


404  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

The  Mathieu  functions  of  higher  order  may  be  obtained  in  a  similar 
manner  from  the  same  integral  equation  and  from  the  integral  equation  of 
§  19'22  example  1.  The  consideration  of  the  convergence  of  the  series  thus 
obtained  is  postponed  to  §  19'61. 

Example  1.     Obtain  the  following  expansions* : 

«      -»(^.  «)  =  '  +  ..!,  {ttJt  -  ^rltXtty'^Oif*')]  cos  2., 

(ii)      ce,  {z,  q)  =  cosz+  ^l^\^^r^Y)lVl  "  (r+ 1) !  (.+ 1)  ! 

(iii)     ..,(.,^)  =  sm.  +  ^2^|^-^;^-^^,  +  ^_^^^,^^._^^^, 

(iv)     ce.2  {z,  ?)  =  I  -  2(?  +  ^  j3  +  0  (25)|  +  cos  2^ 

'^4iV!(r  +  2)!+  32.(r  +  2)!(r  +  3)!  +^^^      )j  cos  (2r+2)., 

where,  in  each  case,  the  constant  implied  in  the  symbol  0  depends  on  r  but  not  on  z. 

(Whittaker.) 

■     Example  2.     Shew  that   the  values  of  a   associated  with  (i)  ce^  (z,  q),  (ii)  cei  {z,  q), 
(iii)  sei  {z,  q),  (iv)  ce.,  {z,  q)  are  respectively : 

310    29 

(i)  -32(^H22V Q—q^'  +  Oiq^), 

(ii)  l-8q-8q'  +  8q^-^q*+0iq% 

(iii)  l+8q-&q'^-8q'-^q*  +  0iq'), 

(iv)  4  +  ^  j2  _  6104  ^,  _^  ^  ^^,^_  (Mathieu.) 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  if  ?i  be  an  integer, 

Oe2n  +  1  (2,  ?)  =  (  -  )"  «<^2»  +  1  (2  +  i-T,    -  g). 

19'31.     The  integral  formulae  for  the  Mathieu  functions. 
Since  all  the  Mathieu  functions  satisfy  a  homogeneous  integral  equation 
with  a  symmetrical  nucleus  (§  19'22  example  3),  it  follows  (§  11-61)  that 

I  ce„,  {z,  q)  cen  {z,  q)dz=0  (m  ^  w), 
I  5e,„  (^,  fy)  5e»  (z,  q)  dz  =  0  (m  ^jt  71), 
ce,n.  (z,  q)  sen  (2,  q)  dz  =  0. 


*  The  leading  terms  of  these  series,  as  given  in  example  4  at  the  end  of  the  chapter  (p.  420), 
were  obtained  by  Mathieu. 


19-31,  19-4]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  405 

Example  1.     Obtain  expansions  of  the  form  : 

(i)  JC  COS  Z  COS  6  ^     I    ^^^^  (^^  ^)  ^^^  (^^  ^^^ 

«=0 

00 

(ii)     cos  {k  sin  «  sin  6)=  2  BnCCn  (z,  q)  cen  {0,  q), 
n=o 

(iii)     sin  (^  sin  2  sin  6)=   2  CnSen  {z,  q)  sen  {6,  q), 
where  Jl;  =  ^{32q). 

Example  2,     Obtain  the  expansion 

as  a  confluent  form  of  expansions  (ii)  and  (iii)  of  example  1. 

19'4.  The  nature  of  the  solution  of  Mathieus  general  equation ;  Floquet's 
theory. 

We  shall  now  discuss  the  nature  of  the  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation 
when  the  parameter  a  is  no  longer  restricted  so  as  to  give  rise  to  periodic 
solutions ;  this  is  the  case  which  is  of  importance  in  astronomical  (as  opposed 
to  physical)  applications  of  the  theory. 

The  method  is  applicable  to  any  linear  equation  with  periodic  coefficients 
which  are  one-valued  functions  of  the  independent  variable ;  the  nature  of 
the  general  solution  of  particular  equations  of  this  type  has  long  been  per- 
ceived by  astronomers,  by  inference  from  the  circumstances  in  which  the 
equations  arise.  These  inferences  have  been  confirmed  by  the  following 
analytical  investigation  which  was  published  in  1883  by  Floquet*. 

Let  g  (z),  h  (z)  be  a  fundamental  system  of  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation 
(or,  indeed,  of  any  linear  equation  in  which  the  coefficients  have  period  27r) ; 
then,  if  i''(2;)  be  any  other  integral  of  such  an  equation,  we  must  have 

F(z)  =  Ag(z)  +  Bh(z), 
where  A  and  B  are  definite  constants. 

Since  g(z +  2'7r),  h(z  +  27r)  are  obviously  solutions  of  the  equation  f,  they 
can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  the  continuations  of  g  (z)  and  Ii  (z)  by  equations 
of  the  type 

g{z  +  277)  =  a,g  (z)  +  a,h  (z),     h  (z  +  2it)  =  ^^g  (^)  +  ^,/i  (^), 

where  Wj,  a^,  /3i,  ^^  are  definite  constants ;  and  then 

F{z^  2it)  =  (^Oi  +  B^^)  g  {z)  +  (^a,  +  i?/3,)  h  {z). 

*  Ann.  dc  VEcolc  Normale  (2),  xiii.  p.  47.  Floquet's  analysis  is  a  natural  sequel  to  Picard's 
theory  of  differential  equations  with  doubly-periodic  (§  'iO'l)  coefficients,  and  to  the  theory 
of  the  fundamental  equation  due  to  Fuchs  and  Hamburger. 

t  These  solutions  may  not  be  identical  with  (j  (z),  h  (z)  respectively,  as  the  solution  of  an 
equation  with  periodic  coefficients  is  not  necessarily  periodic.     To  take  a  simple  case,  u  =  t'^siu  z 

is  a  solution  of       —  (l  +  cot^)  u  =  0. 


406  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

Consequently  F  (z -[■  27r)  =  kF{z),  where  h  is  a  constant*,  if  A  and  B  are 

chosen  so  that 

Aa,  +  B^,  =  kA,     Aa,  +  B^,  =  kB. 

These   equations   will   have   a  solution,  other  than  A  =B  =  0,   if,   and 

only  if, 

k-k,        /3i      1=0; 

0-2    ,     ^2—k\ 

and  if  k  be  taken  to  be  either  root  of  this  equation,  the  function  F  (z)  can  be 
constructed  so  as  to  be  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation  such  that 

F(z+27r)  =  kF(z). 

Defining  /x  by  the  equation  k^e^''*^  and  writing  4^{z)  for  e~>^^F{z),  we  see 

that 

0  (^  +  2-77)  =  e-"  t^+^"'  F{z  +  27r)  -  </)  {z). 

Hence  the  differential  equation  has  a  particular  solution  of  the  form 
e'^^  (p  (z),  where  (f)  (z)  is  a  periodic  function  with  period  27r. 

We  have  seen,  that  in  physical  problems,  the  parameters  involved  in  the 
differential  equation  have  to  be  so  chosen  that  ^  =  1  is  a  root  of  the  quadratic, 
and  a  solution  is  periodic.  In  general,  however,  in  astronomical  problems,  in 
which  the  parameters  are  given,  k^l  and  there  is  no  periodic  solution. 

In  the  particular  case  of  Mathieu's  general  equation  or  Hill's  equation,  a 
fundamental  system  of  solutionsf  is  then  e'*^  (f>  (z),  e"*^^  <j>  (—  z),  since  the 
equation  is  unaltered  by  writing  —  z  for  ^ ;  so  that  the  complete  solution  of 
Mathieu's  general  equation  is  then 

u  =  Cje'*^  ^  {z)  +  c^c'^ip  (-  z), 
where  Ci,  Cg  are  arbitrary  constants,  and  yu.  is  a  definite  function  of  a  and  q. 
Example.     Shew  that  the  roots  of  the  equation 

a^-k,       /3i      =0 

are  independent  of  the  particular  pair  of  solutions,  g  {z)  and  h  (z),  chosen. 

19'41.     Hill's  method  of  solution. 

Now  that  the  general  functional  character  of  the  solution  of  equations 
with  periodic  coefficients  has  been  found  by  Floquet's  theory,  it  might  be 
expected  that  the  determination  of  an  explicit  expression  for  the  solutions  of 
Mathieu's  and  Hill's  equations  would  be  a  comparatively  easy  matter;  this 
however  is  not  the  case.  For  example,  in  the  particular  case  of  Mathieu's 
general  equation,  a  solution  has  to  be  obtained  in  the  form 

y^ei'^cf)  (z), 

*  The  symbol  k  is  used  in  this  particular  sense  only  in  this  section.     It  must  not  be  confused 
with  the  constant  ^  of  §  19'21,  which  was  associated  with  the  parameter  q  of  Mathieu's  equation. 
+  The  ratio  of  these  solutions  is  not  even  periodic ;  still  less  is  it  a  constant. 


19-41]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  407 

where  ^  (z)  is  periodic  and  ^t  is  a  function  of  the  parameters  a  and  q.  The 
crux  of  the  problem  is  to  determine  fi ;  when  this  is  done,  the  determination 
of  ^(^)  presents  comparatively  little  difficulty. 

The  first  successful  method  of  attacking  the  problem  was  published  by 
Hill  in  the  memoir  cited  in  §  19'12;  as  the  method  for  Hill's  equation  is  no 
more  difficult  than  for  the  special  case  of  Mathieu's  general  equation,  we  shall 
discuss  the  case  of  Hill's  equation,  viz. 

^:  +  j-(.)«=o, 

where  J  (z)  is  an  even  function  of  z  with  period  tt.  Two  cases  are  of  interest, 
the  analysis  being  the  same  in  each : 

(I)  The  astronomical  case  when  z  is  real  and,  for  real  values  of  z,  J{z) 
can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

J(z)  =$0  +  2^1  cos  2z  +  202  cos  4!Z  +  2^3  cos  6^  +  . . . ; 

CO 

the  coefficients  6n  are  known  constants  and   X  6n  converges  absolutely. 

(II)  The  case  when  ^  is  a  complex  variable  and  J(z)  is  analjrtic  in  a 
strip  of  the  plane  (containing  the  real  axis),  whose  sides  are  parallel  to  the 

real  axis.     The  expansion  of  J{z)  in  the  Fourier  series  6o  +  2  %  On  cos  2nz 

is  then  valid  (§  9*1 1)  throughout  the  interior  of  the  strip,  and,  as  before, 

00 

2   On  converges  absolutely. 

Defining  Q_n  to  be  equal  to  On,  we  assume 

00 
ri,=  -  00 

as  a  solution  of  Hill's  equation. 

[In  case  (II)  this  is  the  solution  analytic  in  the  strip  (!:$§  10-2,  19-4);  in  case  (I)  it  will 
have  to  be  shewn  ultimately  (see  the  note  at  the  end  of  §  19-42)  that  the  values  of  6„ 

which  will  be  determined  are  such  as  to  make     2    u-6„  absolutely  convergent,  in  order  to 

n—  —  'x> 

justify  the  processes  which  we  shall  now  carry  out.] 
On  substitution  in  the  equation,  we  find 

i     (/^+2m)=6„e<'^+^»^'^  +  (    ^    ^«e^'"^l  (    ^     6„e"^+-'»'^)  =  0. 

Multiplying  out  the  absolutely  convergent  series  and  equating  coefficients 
of  powers  of  e^^^  to  zero  (§§  9-6-9-632),  we  obtain  the  system  of  equations 

(/x  +  2m)-^6„+     i    ^m&«-m  =  0  (n=..., -2, -1,0,  1,  2,  ...). 


408 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap,    XIX 


If  \ve  eliminate  the  coefficients  6„  determinantally  (after  dividing  the 
typical  equation  by  6^  —  4<n-  to  secure  convergence)  we  obtain  *  Hill's  deter- 
minantal  equation : 


(t/t  +  4)2- 

Oq          -<9i 

-02 
4^^-00 

-0z 
4'' -00 

-0i 

•■•    42-^0 

4^-^o 

4'' -00      '" 

-Si 

(Z/X  + 2)2-^0 
22-^0 

-01 

-02 

-0z 

-      22-^0 

2' -00 

^'-00 

2-^-e,    - 

-62 

-01 

{it^f-00 
O-'-0o 

-01 

-02 

'"      02-^0 

o-'-Oo 

o-'-e. 

02-^0     ■■• 

-^3 

-02 

-01 

(i>-2)2- 

22-^0 

00          —01 

-      2-^-^0 

■P-80 

2^-^o      ■•• 

-^4 

-03 

4:-' -00 

-02 

-01 

(2>- 4)2-^0 

•••       4^-^o 

4'' -00 

42-^0 

42-^0    •■■ 

We  write  A  (^/u,)  for  the  determinant,  so  the  equation  determining  fi  is 

A  (ifi)  =  0. 

19'42.     The  evaluation  of  Hill's  determinant 

We   shall  now  obtain  an  extremely  simple  expression  for  Hill's  deter- 
minant, namely 

A  (ifji)  =  A  (0)  -  sin'^  (h'""^/^)  cosec-  {^tt  \/6o)- 

Adopting  the  notation  of  §  2  "8,  we  write 

A(*»  =  [^^,„], 

(ifj,-2my~-e. 


where         A  m,  m  — 


The  determinant  [vl„,_,i]  is  only  conditionally  convergent,  since  the  product 
of  the  principal  diagonal  elements  does  not  converge  absolutely  (§§  2"81,  2'7). 
We  can,  however,  obtain  an  ahsolutely  convergent  determinant,  Ai  {ifi),  by 
dividing  the  linear  equations  of  §  19"41  by  0Q-(i/u,—  2}if  instead  of  dividing 
by  ^0  —  4h-.     We  write  this  determinant  Aj  {ifju)  in  the  form  [5„i,,i],  where 


^m.m  —  J-)        J^n 


{2m-iiJ.y-e, 


(ni  ^  n). 


The  absolute  convergence  of    S  On  secures  the  convergence  of  the  deter- 

»=o 
minant  \_Bm,ii],  except  when  fx  has  such  a  value  that  the  denominator  of  one 
of  the  expressions  i^,„,,i  vanishes. 

*  Since  the  coefficients  6„  are  not  all  zero,  we  may  obtain  the  infinite  determinant  as  the 
eliminant  of  the  system  of  linear  equations  by  multiplying  these  equations  by  suitably  chosen 
cofactors  and  adding  up. 


19-42]  MATHIEU  FUNCTIONS  409 

From  the  definition  of  an  infinite  determinant  (§  2*8)  it  follows  that 

A(i^)=A,o»iim  fi  f'-/^:!"n, 

p-».oo  n=—p  (         "q        *»*  ) 

and  so  A(z^)-     A,0^)  shi^O^^V^^ • 

Now,  if  the  determinant  Aj  (lyu,)  be  written  out  in  full,  it  is  easy  to  see 
(i)  that  Ai  (i/x)  is  an  even  periodic  function  of  /x  with  period  2i,  (ii)  that  Ai  (ifi) 
is  an  analytic  function  (cf  §§  2-81,  3*34,  5-3)  of  fi  (except  at  its  obvious  simple 
poles),  which  tends  to  unity  as  the  real  part  of  //.  tends  to  +  oo . 

If  now  we  choose  the  constant  K  so  that  the  function  D  (/j,),  defined  by 
the  equation 

D  (fji)  =  Ai  (ifl)  -  K  {cot  ^  TT  (*>  +  V^o)  -  cot  ^TT  {ifi  -  ^/^,)], 

has  no  pole  at  the  point  /i  =  iV^o,  then,  since    i)  (/u,)   is  an  even  periodic 
function  of  //,,  it  follows  that  D  (/x)  has  no  pole  at  any  of  the  points 

2/11  ±i  \/6o, 
where  n  is  any  integer. 

The  function  D  {/j,)  is  therefore  a  periodic  function  of  fj,  (with  period  2i) 
which  has  no  poles,  and  which  is  obviously  bounded  as  R  (/x.)  -*  +  oo  .  The 
conditions  postulated  in  Liouville's  theorem  (§  5"63)  are  satisfied,  and  so  D  (fju) 
is  a  constant ;  making  /z.  -^  +  oo  ,  we  see  that  this  constant  is  unity. 

Therefore 

Ai  (i»  =  1  +  K  [cot  ^TT  (^>  +  V^o)  -  cot  I  TT  {{/M  -  s/e,)], 
and  so 

A  /,•  \          sin|7r(tV-V6>n)sin|7rO>  +  V^o)  ,  ^  ^^      ,  ,,        ... 
A  M  = sin-(i^v^o) +  ^^  '"'  ^*"  ^^"^- 

To  determine  K,  put  yu,  =  0  ;  then 

A(0)  =  l  +  2^cot(i7rV6'o). 
Hence,  on  subtraction, 

A(^^)  =  A(0)-4-^^^^*'^^■^> 


sin2(i7r\/6'o)' 
which  is  the  result  stated. 

The  roots  of  Hill's  deterviinantal  equation  are  therefore  the  roots  of  the 
equation 

sin^  i^irifM)  =  A  (0)  .  sin-  (i ir  V^o)- 

When  fi,  has  thus  been  determined,  the  coefficients  hn  can  be  determined 
in  terms  of  &„  and  cofactors  of  A  (i/x) ;  and  the  solution  of  Hill's  differential 
equation  is  complete. 


410  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

[In  case  (I)  of  §  19*41,  the  convergence  of  2  |  6»  |  follows  from  the  rearrangement  theorem 

00 

of  §  2"82 ;  for  27^^  ]  6„  |  is  equal  to  |  ftg  I     2     |  Cm,o  I  -^  |  C'o.o  I  j  where  Cm,n  is  the  cofactor  of  B^n 

m  =  —  <xi 

in  Ai  {ijjL) ;  and  2  |  C,„_o  I  is  the  determinant  obtained  by  replacing  the  elements  of  the  row 
through  the  origin  by  numbers  whose  moduli  are  bounded.] 

It  was  shewn  by  Hill  that,  for  the  purposes  of  his  astronomical  problem,  a  remarkably 
good  approximation  to  the  value  of  /x  could  be  obtained  by  considering  only  the  three 
central  rows  and  columns  of  his  determinant. 

19'5.     The  Lindemaym- Stieltjes  theory  of  Mathieus  general  equation. 

Up  to  the  present,  Mathieu's  equation  has  been  treated  as  a  linear 
differential  equation  with  periodic  coefficients.  Some  extremely  interesting 
properties  of  the  equation  have  been  obtained  by  Lindemann*  by  the  sub- 
stitution ^=cos^^,  which  transforms  the  equation  into  an  equation  with 
rational  coefficients,  namely 

4^(1-0^'  + 2  (l-2O^  +  (a-16^  +  325r)t^  =  0. 

This  equation,  though  it  somewhat  resembles  the  hypergeometric  equation,  is  of  higher 
type  than  the  equations  dealt  with  in  Chapters  xiv  and  xvi,  inasmuch  as  it  has  two 
regular  singularities  at  0  and  1  and  an  irregular  singularity  at  oo  ;  whereas  the  three 
singularities  of  the  hypergeometric  equation  are  all  regular,  while  the  equation  for  W^^^  (z) 
has  one  irregular  singularity  and  only  one  regular  singularity. 

We  shall  now  give  a  short  account  of  Lindemann's  analysis,  with  some 
modifications  due  to  Stieltjesf. 

19'51.     Lindemann's  form  of  Floquet's  theorem. 

Since  Mathieu's  equation  (in  Lindemann's  form)  has  singularities  at  ^=0 
and  ^=1,  the  exponents  at  each  being  0,  |,  there  exist  solutions  of  the  form 


2/00=  s  a.  r,  7/ol  =  r*S&n^^ 

2/,o  =  S  «,/  (1  -  r)^    vn = (1  -  r)'  i  ^n  (i  -  ^r ; 

the  first  two  series  converge  when  ]  ^|  <  1,  the  last  two  when  j  1  —  ^[  <  1. 

When  the  ^-plane  is  cut  along  the  real  axis  from  1  to  +  oo  and  from 
0  to  —  00 ,  the  four  functions  defined  by  these  series  are  one-valued  in  the 
cut  plane ;  and  so  relations  of  the  form 

2/io  =  ayoo  +  /S^/oi ,       2/n  =  72/00  +  S?/oi 

will  exist  throughout  the  cut  plane. 

Now  suppose  that  ^  describes  a  closed  circuit  round  the  origin,  so  that  the 
circuit  crosses  the  cut  from  —  oo  to  0 :    the  analytic  continuation  of  y■^^  is 

*  Math.  Ann.  xxii.  (1883),  p.  117. 

+  AAtr.  Nach.   cix.    (1884).     The   analysis   is   very  similar   to    that    employed   by  Hermite 
(Oeiiv7-es,  III.  p.  118)  in  connexion  with  Lame's  equation. 


19-5-19'52]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  411 

ayoo  —  ySyoi  (since  yw,  is  unaffected  by  the  description  of  the  circuit,  but  yoi 
changes  sign)  and  the  continuation  of  yu  is  73/00  —  Syoi  \  (^nd  so  Ay^^  +  By^^  will 
he  unaffected  by  the  description  of  the  circuit  if 

A  (ayoo  +  ySyoi)'  +  B  (72/00  +  Byo^Y  =  A  {ay^  -  ^y,,y  +  B  (73/00  -  %ol)^ 
i.e.  if  Aa^  +  BjS  =  0. 

Also  Ay-^o^+Byn  obviously  has  not  a  branch-point  at  ^=1,  and  so,  if 
Aa/3  +  ByB  =  0,  this  function  has  no  branch-points  at  0  or  1,  and,  as  it  has  no 
other  possible  singularities  in  the  finite  part  of  the  plane,  it  must  he  an 
integral  function  of  ^. 

The  two  expressions 

A^y.o  +  iB^-yn,     A'^y^,  -  iB^y^ 

are  consequently  two  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation  whose  product  is  an 
integral  function  of  f. 

[This  amounts  to  the  fact  (§  19"4)  that  the  product  of  e'^(f>{z)  and 
e~i^^<l>{—z)  is  a  periodic  integral  function  of  zJ] 

19'52.  The  determination  of  the  integral  function  associated^  with  Mathieu's 
general  equation. 

The  integral  function  F{z)  ~  Ay^o'+  By^^  just  introduced,  can  be  deter- 
mined without  difficulty ;  for  if  y^o  and  yn  are  any  solutions  of 

J+p(?)|+«(r)»=o, 

their  squares  (and  consequently  any  linear  combination  of  their  squares) 
satisfy  the  equation* 

^  +  3P  (0  ^  +  [P'  iO  +  4Q  (D  +  2  {P  iOY]  I 

+  2[Q'(O+2P(OQ(O]2/  =  0; 
in  the  case  under  consideration,  this  result  reduces  to 

,a-r)™.ia-2r)-^) 

+  (a  -  1  -  16^  +  32^^)  ^^^  +  IQqF  (^  =  0. 
Let  the  Maclaurin  series  for  P(^)  be    S  CnC"}  on  substitution,  we  easily 

n=0 

obtain  the  recurrence  formula  for  the  coefficients  c^,  namely 

where 

{n  +  1)  {{n  +  If  -  a  +  16q}  n(n  +  l)(2n+l) 

"""  Wq{2n+1)  '       ^"~  S2q{2n-1)      ' 

*  Appell,  Cojuptes  Eendiis,  xci. 


412 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XIX 


At  first  sight,  it  appears  from  the  recurrence  formula  that  Co  and  c^  can 
be  chosen  arbitrarily,  and  the  remaining  coefficients  Cg,  Cg,  ...  calculated  in 
terms  of  them;  but  the  third  order  equation  has  a  singularity  at  ^=  1,  and 
the  series  thus  obtained  would  have  only  unit  radius  of  convergence.  It  is 
necessary  to  choose  the  value  of  the  ratio  Ci/co  so  that  the  series  may  con- 
verge for  all  values  of  ^. 

The  recurrence  formula,  when  written  in  the  form 

/      /  \  —         J_  ^n+i 

suggests  the  consideration  of  the  infinite  continued  fraction 


l("n  + 


+  1*71+2  + 


=   lim  \un  + 


^^Tl+l  +   .  .  .    +  W^ 


%) 


The  continued  fraction  on  the  right  can  be  written^ 
UnK (n,  n  +  m)IK {n+\,  n  +  m), 


where      K  (n,  n  +  m)  =         1 

-  K 
0 


—  u' 


0  , 

1  , 


—  U 


11+111) 


The  limit  of  this,  as  m^-  ao  ,  is  a  convergent  determinant  of  von  Koch  s 
type  (by  the  example  of  §  2*82) ;  and  since 


r=n 


0  as  72.  -^  CO  , 


it  is  easily  seen  that  K{n,  oo  )  ^- 1  as  7i  ^-  oo  . 

Therefore,  if  -  ^'^  =  ^'^/^i^L^"^  >  , 

Cn+i      K{n  +  1,  CO) 

then  Cn  satisfies  the  recurrence  formula  and,  since  Cn+ijCn-^O  as  n -^  oo  ,  the 
resulting  series  for  F(^)  is  an  integral  function.  From  the  recurrence  formula 
it  is  obvious  that  all  the  coefficients  c„  are  finite,  since  they  are  finite  when  n 
is  sufficiently  large.  The  construction  of  the  integral  function  F(^)  has 
therefore  been  effected. 

19'53.     The  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation  in  terms  of  F (^). 
If  Wi  and  W.2  be  two  particular  solutions  of 


then-f- 


Wjw/  —  iu^W2  =  G  exp  \—\  P  {^)d^\, 

*  Sylvester,  Phil.  Mag.  (i),  Vol.  v.  (1853),  p.  446. 

t  Abel,  Crelle,  ii.  p.  22.     Dashes  denote  differentiations  with  regard  to  f. 


19-53,  196]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  413 

where  (7  is  a  definite  constant.    Taking  w^  and  W2  to  be  those  two  solutions  of 
Mathieu's  general  equation  whose  product  is  F  {l^),  we  have 

Wi      w^      ^^{\-^)^F{^y     w,      W2      F{i)' 
the  latter  following  at  once  from  the  equation  WiW2  =  F{^). 

Solving  these  equations  for  Wi/wi  and  w^jw^.,  and  then  integrating,  we  at 
once  get 

where  71,  72  are  constants  of  integration;  obviously  no  real  generality  is  lost 
by  taking  Co  =  71  =  72  =  1. 

From  the  former  result  we  have,  for  small  values  of  |  ^|, 

^,  =  1  +  c/rU  ^  (c,  +  G')  r+o  (^*), 

while,  in  the  notation  of  §  19 "51,  we  have  aija^  =  —  ^a  +  85. 

Hence  G^  =  IQq  —  a  —  Ci. 

This  equation  determines  G  in  terms  of  a,  q  and  Ci,  the  value  of  Cj  being 

K(l,oo)^{uoK{0,  x)}. 

Example  1.  If  the  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation  be  e*'^^0(±2),  where  (f){z)  is 
periodic,  shew  that 

Example  2.     Shew  that  the  zeros  of  F{()  are  all  simple,  unless  (7=0. 

(Stieltjes.) 

[If  F{()  could  have  a  repeated  zero,  Wj  and  ^V2  would  then  have  an  essential  singularity.] 

19'6.     A  second  method  of  constructing  the  Mathieu  function. 

So  far,  it  has  been  assumed  that  all  the  various  series  of  §  19*3  involved 
in  the  expressions  for  cej^  {z,  q)  and  scj^  {z,  q)  are  convergent.  It  will  now  he 
shewn  that  cejff{z,  q)  and  se]^{z,  q)  are  integral  functions  of  z  and  that  the 
coefficients  in  their  expansions  as  Fourier  series  are  power  series  in  q  which 
converge  absolutely  when  \q\  is  sufficiently  small*. 

To  obtain  this  result  for  the  functions  ce^{z,  q),  we  shall  shew  how  to 
determine  a  particular  integral  of  the  equation 

d^u 

-r-j  +  (a  +  16g  cos  2z)  u='y\r  (a,  q)  cos  Nz 

*  The  essential  part  of  this  theorem  is  the  convergence  of  the  series  which  occur  in  the 
coefficients ;  it  is  already  known  {§§  10-2,  10-21)  that  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation  are  integral 
functions  of  z,  and  (in  the  case  of  periodic  solutions)  the  existence  of  the  Fourier  expansion 
follows  from  §  9*11. 


414  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

in  the  form  of  a  Fourier  series  converging  over  the  whole  ^^-plane,  where 
^fr  (a,  q)  is  a  function  of  the  parameters  a  and  q.  The  equation  yjr  (a,  q)  =  0 
then  determines  a  relation  between  a  and  q  which  gives  rise  to  a  Mathieu 
function.  The  reader  who  is  acquainted  with  the  method  of  Frobenius*  as 
applied  to  the  solution  of  linear  differential  equations  in  power  series  will 
recognise  the  resemblance  of  the  following  analysis  to  his  work. 

Write  a  =  N'^  +  Sp,  where  iV  is  zero  or  a  positive  or  negative  integer. 

Mathieu's  equation  becomes 

-j-^  +  N'^u  =  -  S  (p  +  2q  cos  2z)  u. 

If  p  and  q  are  neglected,  a  solution  of  this  equation  is  u  =  cos  N'z  =  Uq  (z), 
say. 

To  obtain  a  closer  approximation,  write  —8(p  +  2q  cos  2z)  Uq  (z)  as  a  sum 
of  cosines,  i.e.  in  the  form 

-H{qco8(N-2)z+p  cos Nz  +  q  cos  {N  +2)z\=  V^ (z),  say. 

Then,  instead  of  solving  -^-^ -\-  N^u=Vi  (z),  suppress  the  terms f  in  Fj  (z) 

which  involve  cosNz;  i.e.  consider  the  function  Wi(z)  where| 

Fi  (z)  =  Fi  (z)  +  8^  cos  Nz, 
A  particular  integral  of 


dz 
is 


"^''l  +  NHi^W.iz) 


''  =  ^  {lO^iT) '''''  (^  -  2>  ^  +  1(1^^)  cos  {N+  2)  ^1  =  U,  (z),  say. 

Now  express  —8(p  +  2q  cos  2z)  U^  {z)  as  a  sum  of  cosines ;  calling  this 
sum  Fa  {z),  choose  Og  to  be  such  a  function  of  p  and  q  that  Fa  (z)  +  o^  cos  iV^2 
contains  no  term  in  cos  Nz  ;  and  let  Fa  {z)  +  a^  cos  iV"^;  =  TTg  (^)- 

Solve  the  equation  -j-^  +  iV^^w  =  W^.  {z), 

and  continue  the  process.  Three  sets  of  functions  U.,n{z),  V^iz),  TF'^(^) 
are  thus  obtained,  such  that  Z7,„  (z)  and  Wm  (z)  contain  no  term  in  cos  JS'z 
when  m  ^  0,  and 

Tfm  (z)  =  Vm  (z)  +  a,„  cos  Nz,     F,^  (^)  =  -  8  (p  +  2^  cos  2z)  Um-i  (z), 

'^^^^  +  N-^U,,{z)=W^{z), 
CLz' 

where  a^„  is  a  function  of  jj  and  q  but  not  of  z. 

*  Crelle,  lxxvi.  pp.  214—224. 

t  The   reason   for   this  suppression   is   that   the   particular   integral    of    —j  +  N'hi  =  cos  Nz 

contains  non-periodic  terms. 

i  Unless  ^=1,  in  which  case  JVi  {z)  —  V-i  {z)  +  8  {p  +  q)  cos  z. 


19()1]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  416 

It  follows  that 

(,»^  )  »»=0  »»=1 

=     S     Vm{z)  +  [^    am)  COS  Nz 

«-l  /    M  \ 

=  —  8  (j9  +  2^  COS  22)    2     C/^-i  (^)  +  (    ^    Olm]  COS  iV>. 
m=0  \w=l        / 

00 

Therefore,  if  U  (z)=  S    Um  {2)  be  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic 

functions   throughout  a   two-dimensional   region   in  the  2-plane,   we   have 
(§  5-3) 

(PU(z) 

,  \     +  (a  +  16g  cos  2z)  U{z)  =  '\\r  {a,  q)  cos  Nz, 

00 
where  ■\lr(a,q)=   S  a,„. 

w  =  l 

It  is  obvious  that,  if  a  be  so  chosen  that  -»/r(a,  q)  =  0,  then  U  (z)  reduces 
to  cej^T^z). 

A  similar  process  can  obviously  be  carried  out  for  the  function  se^  {z,  q) 
by  making  use  of  sines  of  multiples  of  z. 

19'61.     The  convergence  of  the  series  defining  Mathieu  functions. 

We  shall  now  examine  the  expansion  of  §  19'6  more  closely,  with  a  view  to  investigating 
the  convergence  of  the  series  involved. 

When  ?i  ^  1,  we  may  obviously  write 

n  n 

Un{z)=    2  */3„,reos(iV-2r)2-f-    2   a„  ,.  cos  (iV^+ 2r)  2, 

the  asterisk  denoting  that  the  first  summation  ceases  at  the  gi'eatest  value  of  r  for  which 
r^hN. 

Since  |  ^  "*■  ^   (   ^n  +  i{z)  =  an  +  iGOii  Nz  -S{p  +  2q  cos  2z)  U^  (2), 

it  follows  on  equating  coefficients  of  cos  (^±  2/-)  z  on  each  side  of  the  equation  t  that 

«n  +  l  =  8^(n»,l+/3n,l), 

r  (r  +  JV)  a,,  +  i^r  =  ^  {pan.r  +  q  ian.r-l  +  a„^r  +  l)}  (r=l,  2,  ..,), 

rir-N)^„^,,r  =  2{p^n.r  +  q{^n.r-l  +  ^n.r  +  l)l-  (r^^N). 

These  formulae  hold  universally  with  the  following  conventions  | : 

«      "n.o  =  /3,,o  =  0       (..=  1,2,...);  V,=/3„„.=0       (r>«) 

t  When  N=0  or  1  these  equations  must  be  modified  by  the  suppression  of  all  the  coeflicieuts 
J  The  conventions  (ii)  and  (iii)  are  due  to  the  fact  that  cosz  =  cos  ( -s),  cos  2^  =  cos(  -  2^). 


416 


THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XIX 


The  reader  will  easily  obtain  the  following  special  formulae  : 

(I)  «i  =  8^,  {lY^l);  a,  =  8(p  +  q),        {JV^l), 

dn^"-     jV  '  9»  + 1  nil 

(III)    a„_^  and  ^n,r  ^'I's  homogeneous  polynomials  of  degree  n  in  p  and  q. 

If  i    an,r=Ar,  2    ^n,r=  B,., 

n=r  n=r 

we  have  yjr  {a,  q)  =  8p  +  8q{Ai+Bj)         (-^^l), 

r{r  +  N)Ar=2{pAr  +  q{A,_i  +  Ar  +  ,)} (A), 

r(r-JV)  B,  =  2{pBr+q{B,._,  +  Br^^)} (B), 

where  Ao  =  B()=l  and  B^  is  subject  to  conventions  due  to  (ii)  and  (iii)  above. 
Now  write        w^  =  -q  {r  {r  +  JV)  —  2p}  ~  i,     w^  =  —q{r{r  —  N)  —  %p}  ~  ^ 
The  result  of  eliminating  Ji,  A^i  ...  ^,--i)  ^r  +  i?  •••  from  the  set  of  equations  (A)  is 

where  A^  is  the  infinite  determinant  of  von  Koch's  type  (§  2"82) 
A^=        1    ,     w^  +  i,        0    ,        0    ,     ... 

Wr  +  2,  1      ,       W'r  +  2)  0     ,       ••• 

0      ,       Wr  +  3,  1      ,       Wr  +  3,       ■•• 


The  determinant  converges  absolutely  (§  2'82  example)  if  no  denominator  vanishes; 
and  A,.-*-l  as  r-^cc  (cf.  §  19'52).  If  p  and  q  be  given  such  values  that  Aq^O, 
2p^r{r  +  JV),  where  r=l,  2,  3,  ...,  the  series 

2     (  —  )'■  W'l  Wo  •  •  •  WrAr  Ao  ~  ^  COS  {JV+  2r)  z 

represents  an  integral  function  of  z. 

In  like  manner  BrDQ  =  {  —  yw{w2  ...  w/Z)^,  where  D^  is  the  finite  determinant 

1     ,     ?y',.  +  i,        0    ,     ... 


the  last  row  being  0,  0,  ...0,  2w\  j^,  1  or  0,  0,  ...0,  w',  ,y_-^,,  l  +  w'i,y_j>  as  iV  is  even 
or  odd. 

The  series   2    Un  [z)  is  therefore 

CO 

COS  Nz + Ao~  1    2    ( -  )*■  Wj  1^2  . . .  w,.  A,,  cos  {N+  2r)  z 
r  =  \ 

+  Do~  ^     2'    ( -  ywi  w./  . . .  IV,: Br  cos  ( A^-  2r)  z, 
r=l 

these  series  converging  uniformly  in  any  boiinded  domain  of  values  of  z,  so  that  term-by- 
term  difterentiations  are  permissible. 

Further,  the  condition  -v//-  (a,  q)  =  0  is  equivalent  to 


pAoD(t-q  («'i  Ai  J)o+iViI)i  A„)  =  0. 


If  we  multiply  Ijy 


n/i- 


2p 


r:^*.V 

n    U 


r=i  [         r{r  +  lY)j    ,.1\    1         r{r-N)j^ 


2p 


19-7]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  417 

the  expression  on  the  left  becomes  an  integral  function  of  both  p  and  q,  NE'  (a,  q),  say ;  the 
terms  of  ^  (a,  q),  which  are  of  lowest  degrees  in  p  and  g,  are  respectively  p  and 


,2/_J LI 

*  \n-\    n+\] 

Now  expand  - — •.  j  — ,„J^^ r  — ^^ — -, — ^-^  dp 

^  27n  J  'ir{If^  +  8p,q)  dp  ^ 


in  ascending  powers  of  q  (cf.  §  7'31),  the  contour  being  a  small  circle  in  the  p-plane,  with 
centre  at  the  origin,  and  |  q  \  being  so  small  that  *  {JV^  +  8p,  q)  has  only  one  zero  inside  the 
contour.  Then  it  follows,  just  as  in  §  7*31,  that,  for  sufficiently  small  values  of  Ig-I, 
we  may  expand  p  as  a  power  series  in  q  commencing*  with  a  term  in  q^ ;  and  if  |  y  | 
be  sufficiently  small  Bq  and  Ao  will  not  vanish,  since  both  are  equal  to  1  when  q  =  0. 

On  substituting  for  p  in  terms  of  q  throughout  the  series  for  U{z),  we  see  that  the 
series  involved  in  cej^{z,  q)  are  absolutely  convergent  when  |  y  |  is  sufficiently  small. 

The  series  involved  in  se^{z,  q)  may  obviously  be  investigated  in  a  similar  manner. 

19'7.     The  method  of  change  of  parameter  \. 

The  methods  of  Hill  and  of  Lindemann-Stieltjes  are  effective  in  determining  ^,  but 
only  after  elaborate  analysis.  Such  analysis  is  inevitable,  as  fi  is  by  no  me^ns  a  simple 
function  of  q ;  this  may  be  seen  by  giving  q  an  assigned  real  value  and  making  a  vary 
from  —  00  to  +  03  ;  then  /x  alternates  between  real  and  complex  values,  the  changes  taking 
place  when,  with  the  Hill-Mathieu  notation,  ^{0)sin^{\TT sja)  passes  through  the  values 
0  and  1 ;  the  complicated  nature  of  this  condition  is  due  to  the  fact  that  A  (0)  is  an 
elaborate  expression  involving  both  a  and  q. 

It  is,  however,  possible  to  express  ^i.  and  a  in  terms  of  q  and  of  a  new  parameter  or, 
and  the  results  are  very  well  adapted  for  purposes  of  numerical  computation  when  |  q  \ 
is  small  J. 

The  introduction  of  the  pai-ameter  o-  is  suggested  by  the  series  for  ce^  (z,  q)  and  se^  {z,  q) 
given  in  §  19"3  example  1  ;  a  consideration  of  these  series  leads  us  to  investigate  the 
potentialities  of  a  solution  of  Mathieu's  general  equation  in  the  form  ^  =  e'^^^(^),  where 

0  (2)  =  sin  (2  — (r)  +  a3COs(3z— (r)  +  63sin  (32-  a-)  +  «5COS  (62  —  o-)  +  65  sin  (52-a-)  +  ..., 
the  parameter  o-  being  rendered  definite  by  the  fact  that  no  term  in  cos  (2  —  <t)  is  to  appear 
in  <^  (2) ;  the  special  functions  sei  (2,  q),  ce^  (2,  q)  are  the  cases  of  this  solution  in  which 
o-  is  0  or  ^TT. 

On  substituting  this  expression  in  Mathieu's  equation,  the  reader  will  have  no  difficulty 
in  obtaining  the  following  approximations,  valid  for§  small  values  of  q  and  real  values  of  a- : 
fj.  =45- sin  2o-  — 125'^sin  2(r  —  12q*sin  4(r  +  0{q^), 

a  =l  +  8q  cos  2o-  +  (  -  16+8  cos 4o-)  q'^-8q^  cos  2(r  +  (^|^-  88  cos  4(r)  q*  +  0 {q% 
a^  =  3^2  sin  2o-  +  3^3  gin  4o-  +  ( -  2li  sin  2(r  +  9  sin  60-)  q*-\-0  (q^), 
bs=q  + q^  cos  2(r  +  i-^^- +  5  cos  4a)  q^  +  {-^r^  cos  2a  +  7  cos  6<r)q*  +  0{q% 
as = V-  ?^  sin  2<r  +  |f  <?*  sin  4a-  +  f  ( j^), 
h  =  h<l'^  +  ^9^  cos  2o-  +  ( -  ^i£-  +  ^f  cos  4(r)  q^  +  0  {q% 
«7  =  t¥8?*sin2o-  +  0(2'S),     It  =  ^ q^ -i-^^q*  cos  2(7 +  0{q%  ' 
«9=  0  (j5),     69=3-1-5^1  +  0  (q-), 
the  constants  involved  in  the  various  functions  0  (9")  depending  on  a.     • 

*  If  iV=l  this  result  has  to  be  modified,  since  there  is  an  additional  term  q  on  the  right  and 
the  term  q'^l{N  -  1)  does  not  appear. 

t  Whittaker,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  xxxn. 

:;:  They  have  been  applied  to  Hill's  problem  by  Ince,  Monthhj  Notices  of  the  R.  A.  S.  lxxv. 

§  The  parameters  q  and  tr  are  to  be  regarded  as  fundamental  in  this  analysis,  instead  of 
a  and  q  as  hitherto. 

W.  M.  A.  27 


418  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

The  domains  of  values  of  q  and  a  for  which  these  series  converge  have  not  yet  been 
determined*. 

If  the  solution  thus  obtained  be  called  A  {z,  o-,  q),  then  A  {z,  a;  q)  and  A  (z,  —  a,  q)  form 
a  fundamental  system  of  solutions  of  Mathieu's  general  equation  if  /x=t=0. 

Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  o-  =  ix0"5  and  g'=0-01,  then 

a  =  1-124,841,4  ...,         /x,  =  i X 0-046,993,5  ...  ; 
shew  also  that,  if  o•=^  and  §'  =  0-01,  then 

a  =  l-321,169,3...,         /i=:i  x  0-145,027,6  .... 

Example  2.     Obtain  the  equations 

joi  =  4 J  sin  2o- —  4g'a3 , 
■  a  =  1  +  Sg'  cos  2(r  —  /i^  -  Sqh^, 
expressing  fx  and  a  in  finite  terms  as  functions  of  q,  cr,  a^  and  63. 
Example  3.     Obtain  the  recurrence  formulae 
{-4n{n  +  l)  +  8qcos2(T-Sqb3±8qi(2n  +  l){a3-sin2(r)}  Z2n  +  i  +  8q{z2n-i  +  Z2n  +  3)=0, 

where  «2n  +  i  denotes  62n  +  i  +  ^<^2»t+i  or  b^n  +  i-iO'in  +  i,  according  as  the  upper  or  lower  sign  is 
taken. 

19 '8.     The  asymptotic  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation. 
If  in  Mathieu's  equation 


d^u      /        1  ,„       ^  . 


we  write  ^  cos  2  =  1,  we  get 


where  M^=.a-\B. 

This  equation  has  an  irregular  singularity  at  infinity.  From  its  resemblance  to  Bessel's 
equation,  we  are  led  to  write  u  =  e^^^~^v,  and  substitute 

v=\  +  {a,l^)  +  {a2ie)  +  - 
in  the  resulting  equation  for  v ;  we  then  find  that 

the  general  coefficient  being  given  by  the  recurrence  formula 

2i(r  +  l)ar+i  =  {J-i/2  +  p+;.(;.+  l)}  +  (2r-l)zX2ar_i-(r2-27-  +  |)Fa^_2. 
The  two  series 

«'V»(l  +  |+p4-...).     «-V»(l-|  +  p-... 

are  formal  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation,  reducing  to  the  well-known  asymptotic 
solutions  of  Bessel's  equation  (§  17"5)  when  k-*~0.  The  formulae  which  connect  them 
with  the  solutions  e  '^~(^{±z)  have  not  yet  been  published. 

*  It  seems  highly  probable  that,  if  |  g'  |  is  sufficiently  small,  the  series  converge  for  all  real 
values  of  tr,  and  also  for  complex  values  of  <t  for  which  j  I  (o-)  |  is  sufficiently  small.  It  may  be 
noticed  that,  when  q  is  real,  real  and  purely  imaginary  values  of  a  correspond  respectively 
to  real  and  purely  imaginary  values  of  ix. 


198]  MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  419 


REFERENCES. 

E.  L.  Mathieu,  LiouvilUs  Journal  (2),  xiii.  (1868),  pp.  137-203, 

G.  W.  Hill,  Acta  Mathematical  viiL  (1886),  pp.  1-36. 

G.  Floquet,  Ann.  de  Vicole  Normale  (2),  xil  (1883),  pp.  47-88. 

C.  L.  F.  LiNDEMANN,  Math.  Ann.,  xxil.  pp.  117-123. 

T.  J.  Stieltjes,  Astronomische  Nach.,  cix. 

A.  LiNDSTEDT,  Astronomische  Nach.,  cm,  civ,  cv. 

R.  C.  Maclaurin,  Trans.  Gamb.  Phil.  Soc,  xvii.  pp.  41-108. 

E.  T.  Whittaker,  Proc.  International  Congress  of  Mathematicians,  Cambridge,  1912, 
L  pp.  366-371. 

E.  T.  Whittaker,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc,  xxxii. 

G.  N.  Watson,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc,  xxxiii. 

A.  W,  Young,  Proc  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc,  xxxii. 

E.  Lindsay  Ince,  Pi-oc  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc,  xxxiii. 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that,  if  ^=^(325-), 

27rceo  (2,  g)  =  ccq  (0,  q)  I       cos  {k  sin  z  sin  d)  ccq  {6,  q)  dd. 

2.  Shew  that  the  even  Mathieu  functions  satisfy  the  integral  equation 

G{z)  =  \r    Jo  {ik  {cos  z  + cos  d)}G{e)d6. 

3.  Shew  that  the  equation 

{az^  +  c)  -,-^  +2az  j_  +{X^cz^  +  m)  u=0 

(where  a,  c,  X,  m  are  constants)  is  satisfied  by 

ii  =  ^e''^%{s)ds 
taken  round  an  appropriate  contovir,  provided  that  v  (s)  satisfies 

(as2  ^ c)  "^^  +  2as  '^  +  {X'-cs''  +  m)  v  (s)  =  0, 

which  is  the  same  as  the  equation  for  u. 

Derive  the  integral  equations  satisfied  by  the  Mathieu  functions  as  particular  cases  of 
this  result. 

27—2 


420  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XIX 

4.  Shew  that,  if  powers  of  q  above  the  fourth  are  neglected,  then 

cei  iz^q)  =  cos  z-\-q  cos  2>z + (f-  (^  cos  hz  —  cos  3s) 

+ ^  (tV  '^^^  *^^~%  ''OS  5^  +  J  cos  Sz) 

+  2'*  ( yIj  cos  92  —  y\  cos  72  +  J  cos  hz  +  -y-  cos  Sz) , 

««!  (2,  y)  =  sin  z  +  2' sin  32  +  5"^  (^  sin  52  +  sin  3z)  ■     • 

+  g:^  (jJg  sin  72  +  A  sin  52+ J  sin  32) 
+  J*  (y|(J  sin  92  +  yJg  sin  72  +  ^  sin  52  -  \i- sin  32), 

ce^  (2,  g')  =  cos  22  +  2-  (cos  42  —  2)  -i-  ^  y^.  cos  62 

+  ^3  ( J.^  cos  82  +  If  cos  42  + -if ) 
+?*  (sitT  cos  IO2  +  |fi§  cos  62). 

(Mathieu.) 

5.  Shew  that  ..,..■. 

ces  (2,  j)  =  cos  32  +  2' (  -  cos  2+1  cos  52) 

+  2^  (cos  2  +  j^j  cos  'lz)-\-(f{-\  cos  z-Vi^  cos  hz-\--^  cos  92)  +  0  (2*), 

and  that,  in  the  case  of  this  function 

a  =  9  +  422-823  +  0(2*).  '' 

(Mathieu.) 

6.  Shew  that,  if  y  (2)  be  a  Mathieu  function,  then  a  second  solution  of  the  corresponding 
differential  equation  is 


y(2)j  {y 


Shew  that  a  second  solution*  of  the  equation  for  ceo  (2,  2)  ^^ 
2 ceo  (2,  2)~42''*i'^22  — 32^sin42  — .... 

7.  If  3/  (2)  be  a  solution  of  Mathieu's  general  equation,  shew  that 

{y(2  +  27r)+y(2-27x)}/y(2) 
is  constant. 

8.  Express  the  Mathieu  functions  as  series  of  Bessel  functions  in  which  the  coefficients 
are  multiples  of  the  coefficients  in  the  Fourier  series  for  the  Mathieu  functions. 

[Substitute  the  Fovirier  series  under  the  integral  sign  in  the  integral  equations  of 
§  19-22.] 

9.  Shew  that  the  confluent  form  of  the  equations  for  ce„  (2,  2)  *ind  ?.en  (2,  q)^  when  the 
eccentricity  of  the  fundamental  ellipse  tends  to  zero,  is,  in  each  case,  the  equation  satisfied 
by  Jn  {ik  cos  2). 

10.  Obtain  the  parabolic  cylinder  functions  of  Chapter  xvi  as  confluent  forms  of  the 
Mathieu  functions,  by  making  the  eccentricity  of  the  fundamental  ellipse  tend  to  unity. 

11.  Shew  that  ce,;  (2,  q)  can  be  exjmnded  in  series  of  the  form 

2    J,„cos2'»2   or    2   5™cos2'»  +  i2, 

m=0  jtt=0 

according  as  n  is  even  or  odd ;  and  that  these  series  converge  when  |  cos  2 1  <  1. 

*  This  solution  is  called  ?«o  {z,  q) ;  the  second  solutions  of  the  equations  satisfied  by  Mathieu 
functions  have  been  investigated  by  Ince,  Proc.  Edinburgh  Math.  Soc.  xxxiii.     See  also  §  19-2. 


MATHIEU   FUNCTIONS  421 

12.  With  the  notation  of  example  11,  shew  that  if 

ceniz,  ?)  =  X„  J^^e*««»^°°«''ce„(d,  q)de, 
then  X„  is  given  by  one  or  other  of  the  series 

provided  that  these  series  converge, 

13.  Shew  that  the  differential  equation  satisfied  by  the  product  of  any  two  solutions 
of  Bessel's  equation  for  functions  of  order  n  is 

where  S  denotes  a  ^ . 

az  '     ■ 

Shew  that  one  solution  of  this  equation  is  an  integral  function  of  z  ;  and  thence,  by  the 
methods  of  §§  19"5-19'5.3,  obtain  the  Bessel  functions,  discussing  particularly  the  case  in 
which  n  is  an  integer. 

14.  Shew  that  an  approximate  solution  of  the  equation  ; 

^+(A+k^smh.^z)ii=0 
az^ 

is  u  =  C  (cosech  zf  sin  {k  cosh  z  +  «), 

where  C  and  t  are  constants  of  integi'ation ;  it  is  to  be  assumed  that  k  is  large,  A  is  not 
very  large  and  z  is  not  very  small. 


CHAPTEK   XX 

ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS.     GENERAL   THEOREMS   AND   THE 
WEIERSTRASSIAN  FUNCTIONS 

20"1.     Doubly -penodic  functions, 

A  most  important  property  of  the  circular  functions  sin 2^,  cos 2^,  tan  5;,  ... 
is  that,  i^  f{z)  denote  any  one  of  them, 

/(^  +  27r)=/(4 

and  hence  f{z  +  2n7r)  =f{z),  for  all  integer  values  of  n.  It  is  on  account 
of  this  property  that  the  circular  functions  are  frequently  described  as 
periodic  functions  with  period  lir.  To  distinguish  them  from  the  functions 
which  will  be  discussed  in  this  and  the  two  following  chapters,  they  are 
called  singly -periodic  functions. 

Let  ft)i,  &J2  bS  any  two  numbers  (real  or  complex)  whose  ratio  is  not  purely 
real.     A  function  which  satisfies  the  equations 

f{z  +  2a,,)  =f{z),      f{z  +  2a),)  =f{z\ 

for  all  values  of  z  for  which/ (2^)  exists,  is  called  a  doubly -periodic  function 
of  z,  with  periods  2a)i,  2a)2.  A  doubly-periodic  function  which  is  analytic 
(except  at  poles),  and  which  has  no  singularities  other  than  poles  in  the 
finite  part  of  the  plane,  is  called  an  elliptic  function. 

[Note.  What  is  now  known  as  an  elliptic  integral*'  occurs  in  the  researches  of  Jakob 
BernoulH  on  the  Elastica.  Maclaurin,  Fagnano,  Legendre,  and  others  considered  such 
integrals  in  connexion  with  the  problem  of  rectifying  an  arc  of  an  ellipse  ;  the  idea  of 
'inverting'  an  elliptic  integral  (J5  21-7)  to  obtain  an  elliptic  function  is  due  to  Abel, 
Jacobi  and  Gauss.] 

The  periods  2a)i,  2a)2  play  much  the  same  part  in  the  theory  of  elliptic 
functions  as  is  played  by  the  single  period  in  the  case  of  the  circular 
functions. 

Before  actually  constructing  any  elliptic  functions,  and,  indeed,  before 
establishing  the  existence  of  such  functions,  it  is  convenient  to  prove  some 

*  A  brief  discussion  of  elliptic  integrals  will  be  found  in  §§  22"7-22'741. 


20*1,  20'11]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  423 

general  theorems  (§§  20"11 — 20*14)  concerning  properties  common  to  all 
elliptic  functions ;  this  procedure,  though  not  strictly  logical,  is  convenient 
because  a  large  number  of  the  properties  of  particular  elliptic  functions  can 
be  obtained  at  once  by  an  appeal  to  these  theorems. 

Example.  The  diflerential  coefficient  of  an  elliptic  function  is  itself  an  elliptic 
function. 

20*11.     Pemod-'parallelograirns. 

The  study  of  elliptic  functions  is  much  facilitated  by  the  geometrical 
representation  afforded  by  the  Argand  diagram. 

Suppose  that  in  the  plane  of  the  variable  z  we  mark  the  points  0,  2(o^, 
2a>2,  2&)i  +  2ft)2,  and,  generally,  all  the  points  whose  complex  coordinates  are 
of  the  form  2m&)i+  2w&)2,  where  m  and  n  are  integers. 

Join  in  succession  consecutive  points  of  the  set  0,  2&>i,  2ft)]  +  2g)2,  ^w^,  0, 
and  we  obtain  a  parallelogram.  If  there  is  no  point  w  inside  or  on  the 
boundary  of  this  parallelogram  (the  vertices  excepted)  such  that 

f{z  +  ^)=f{z) 

for  all  values  of  2^,  this  parallelogram  is  called  a.  fundamental  period-parallelo- 
gram for  an  elliptic  function  with  periods  2a>i,  ^co^. 

It  is  clear  that  the  ^-plane  may  be  covered  with  a  network  of  parallelo- 
grams equal  to  the  fundamental  period-parallelogram  and  similarly  situated, 
each  of  the  points  2m<o^  +  ^noo^  being  a  vertex  of  four  parallelograms. 

These  parallelograms  are  called  period-parallelograms,  or  meshes ;  for  all 
values  of  z,  the  points  z,  z+2q)i,  ...  z  +  2m(0i  +  2nco2,  ...  manifestly  occupy 
corresponding  positions  in  the  meshes ;  any  pair  of  such  points  are  said  to 
be  congruent  to  one  another.  The  congruence  of  two  points  z,  z'  is  expressed 
by  the  notation  /  =  5  (mod.  2wi,  26)2). 

From  the  fundamental  property  of  elliptic  functions,  it  follows  that  an 
elliptic  function  assumes  the  same  value  at  every  one  of  a  set  of  congruent 
points ;  and  so  its  values  in  any  mesh  are  a  mere  repetition  of  its  values  in 
any  other  mesh. 

For  purposes  of  integration  it  is  not  convenient  to  deal  with  the  actual 
meshes  if  they  have  singularities  of  the  integrand  on  their  boundaries ;  on 
account  of  the  periodic  properties  of  elliptic  functions  nothing  is  lost  by 
taking  as  a  contour,  not  an  actual  mesh,  but  a  parallelogram  obtained 
by  translating  a  mesh  (without  rotation)  in  such  a  way  that  none  of  the  poles 
of  the  integrands  considered  are  on  the  sides  of  the  parallelogram.  Such  a 
parallelogram  is  called  a  cell.  Obviously  the  values  assumed  by  an  elliptic 
function  in  a  cell  are  a  mere  repetition  of  its  values  in  any  mesh. 

A  set  of  poles  (or  zeros)  of  an  elliptic  function  in  any  given  cell  is  called 
an  irreducible  set ;  all  other  poles  (or  zeros)  of  the  function  are  congruent  to 
one  or  other  of  them. 


424  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

20'12.     Simple  properties  of  elliptic  functions. 

(I)  The  number  of  poles  of  an  elliptic  function  in  any  cell  is  finite. 

For,  if  not,  the  poles  would  have  a  limit  point,  by  the  two-dimensional 
analogue  of  §  2  •21.  This  point  is  (§  5'61)  an  essential  singularity  of  the 
function ;  and  so,  by  definition,  the  function  is  not  an  elliptic  function. 

(II)  The  number  of  zeros  of  an  elliptic  function  in  any  cell  is  finite. 

For,  if  not,  the  reciprocal  of  the  function  would  have  an  infinite  number 
of  poles  in  the  cell,  and  would  therefore  have  an  essential  singularity ;  and 
this  point  would  be  an  essential  singularity  of  the  original  function,  which 
would  therefore  not  be  an  elliptic  function.  [This  argument  presupposes 
that  the  function  is  not  identically  zero.] 

(III)  The  sum  of  the  residues  of  an  elliptic  function,  f{z),  at  its  poles  in 
any  cell  is  zero. 

Let  G  be  the  contour  formed  by  the  edges  of  the  cell,  and  let  the  corners 
of  the  cell  be  ^,  ^  +  2&)i,  t  +  2a)i  +  2a)2,  t  +  2a)2. 

[Note.  In  future,  the  periods  of  an  elliptic  function  will  not  be  called  2coi,  2cd2 
indifferently  ;  but  that  one  will  be  called  Stoi  which  makes  the  ratio  0)2/0)1  have  a  positive 
imaginary  part ;  and  then  if  C  be  described  in  the  sense  indicated  by  the  order  of  the 
corners  given  above,  the  description  of  C  is  counter-clockwise. 

Throughout  the  chapter,  we  shall  denote  by  the  symbol  C  the  contour  formed  by 
the  edges  of  a  cell.] 

The  sum  of  the  residues  oi  f{z)  at  its  poles  inside  C  is 

If  If   /•<+2w,  /•<+2w,+2<02  r<+2(02  n  \ 

2^-      /(^)^^  =  2^-  +  +  +  \f{^)dz. 

^^^  J  C  ^TTt    [J  t  J  t+2oi^  J   f+2a>,+2a)2        J  t+2uij 

In  the  second  and  third  integrals  write  z  +  2&)i,  z  +  2&)o  respectively  for 
f(z),  and  the  right-hand  side  becomes 

2^-  fj"^'  \f{^)  -/(^  +  2a).)}  dz  -  2^.  J'^"""^  [f{z)  -f{z  +  20,,)}  dz, 

and  each  of  these  integrals  vanishes  in  virtue  of  the  periodic  properties  of 

f{z) ;  and  so  1    f{z)  dz  =  0,  and  the  theorem  is  established. 
J  c 

(IV)  Liouville's  theorem*.  An  elliptic  function,  f{z),  with  no  poles  in  a 
cell  is  merely  a  constant. 

For  if  f{z)  has  no  poles  inside  the  cell,  it  is  analytic  (and  consequently 
bounded)  inside  and  on  the  boundary  of  the  cell  (§  3'61  corollary  ii);  that  is 
to  say,  there  is  a  number  K  such  that  \f{z)  \  <  K  when  z  is  inside  or  on  the 
boundary  of  the  cell.     From  the  periodic  properties  of  f{z)  it  follows  that 

*  This  modification  of  the  theorem  of  §  5-63  is  the  result  on  which  Liouville  based  his 
lectures  on  elUiDtic  functions. 


20-12,  20-13]  ELLIPTIC    FUNCTIONS  425 

f{z)  is  analytic  and  \f{z)\  <  K  for  all  values  of  z;  and  so  (§  5-63) /(^)  is  a 
constant. 

It  will  be  seen  later  that  a  very  large  number  of  theorems  concerning 
elliptic  functions  can  be  proved  by  the  aid  of  this  result. 

20'13.     The  order  of  an  elliptic  function. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  if  f{z)  be  an  elliptic  function  and  c  be  any 
constant,  the  number  of  roots  of  the  equation 

fi^)  =  c 

which  lie  in  any  cell  depends  only  on  f(z),  and  not  on  c ;  this  number  is 
called  the  order  of  the  elliptic  function,  and  is  equal  to  the  number  of  poles 
oif{z)  in  the  cell. 

By  §  6-31,  the  difference  between  the  number  of  zeros  and  the  number 
of  poles  oi  f{z)  —  c  which  lie  in  the  cell  C  is 


l.f 


f'(^) 


dz. 


^'rriJcfi^) 

Since  /'  (z  +  2a)x)  =/'  (z  +  2co2)  =f'  (z),  by  dividing  the  contour  into  four 
parts,  precisely  as  in  §  20-12  (III),  it  follows  that  this  integral  is  zero. 

Therefore  the  number  of  zeros  of  f{z)  —  c  is  equal  to  the  number  of 
poles  of  f(z)  —  c  ;  but  any  pole  of  f(z)  —  c  is  obviously  a  pole  of  f(z)  and 
conversely ;  hence  the  number  of  zeros  of  f(z)  —  c  is  equal  to  the  number 
of  poles  of  f(z),  which  is  independent  of  c ;  the  required  result  is  therefore 
established. 

[Note.  In  determining  the  order  of  an  elliptic  function  by  counting  the  number  of 
its  irreducible  poles,  it  is  obvious,  from  §  6"31,  that  each  pole  has  to  be  reckoned  according 
to  its  multiplicity.] 

The  order  of  an  elliptic  function  is  never  less  than  2 ;  for  an  elliptic 
function  of  order  1  would  have  a  single  irreducible  pole ;  and  if  this  point 
actually  were  a  pole  (and  not  an  ordinary  point)  the  residue  there  would 
not  be  zero,  which  is  contrary  to  the  result  of  §  20*12  (III). 

So  far  as  singularities  are  concerned,  the  simplest  elliptic  functions  are 
those  of  order  2.  Such  functions  may  be  divided  into  two  classes,  (i)  those 
which  have  a  single  irreducible  double  pole,  at  which  the  residue  is  zero  in 
accordance  with  §  2012  (III) ;  (ii)  those  which  have  two  simple  poles  at  which 
the  residues  are  numerically  equal  but  opposite  in  sign  by  §  20"  12  (III). 

Functions  belonging  to  these  respective  classes  will  be  discussed  in  this 
chapter  and  in  Chapter  xxii  under  the  names  of  Weierstrassian  and 
Jacobian  elliptic  functions  respectively ;  and  it  will  be  shewn  that  any 
elliptic  function  is  expressible  in  terms  of  functions  of  either  of  these 
types. 


426  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

20*14.     Relation  between  the  zeros  and  poles  of  an  elliptic  function. 

We  shall  now  shew  that  the  sum  of  the  affixes  of  a  set  of  irreducible 
zeros  of  an  elliptic  function  is  congruent  to  the  sum  of  the  affixes  of  a  set  of 
irreducible  poles. 

For,  with  the  notation  previously  employed,  it  follows,  from  §  6'31,  that 
the  difference  between  the  sums  in  question  is 


TTlJc    J{Z)  ZTTl    [Jt  .^+2.0,  ^  !^+2a,,+2a,2        J  t+2oj,\     f{z) 

1     f  ^+2-'  izf  {z)      (z  +  2co,)f'  (z  +  2cc,)] 


27ri 


'^TriJt         \f{z)  f{z+2Q),) 

_  J_  f*'-"'^  Wi^)  _  (^+20)0/(^4-20,,)] 
27rW.        \f{z)  f{z  +  2c.,)  r^ 

2o,,p/;i^)c^.+2o,.p-^>c^4 

Jt        f{z)  Jt         f{z)      J 


1 

"liri 

27ri  \ 


_  9 


ZCO., 


log/(^) 


«-|-2a 


+  2o,i 


log/(^) 


t 


on  making  use  of  the  substitutions  used  in  §  2012  (III)  and  of  the  periodic 
properties  oi  f{z)  and/' (2). 

Now /(2')  has  the  same  values  at  the  points  t+2oii,  ^+2o,2as  at  t,  so 
the  values  of  log/(^)  at  these  points  can  only  differ  from  the  value  oi  f{z) 
at  t  by  integer  multiples  of  27rz,  say  —  2n7ri,  2rtnTi ;  then  we  have 

^-JriJc  f{z) 

and  so  the  sum  of  the  affixes  of  the  zeros  minus  the  sum  of  the  affixes  of 
the  poles  is  a  period ;  and  this  is  the  result  which  had  to  be  established. 


-Vr  V    dz  =  2mo)i  +  2?io,2, 
■J  c  JKz) 


20*2.     The  construction  of  an  elliptic  function.     Definition  of  (^  {z). 

It  was  seen  in  §  20*1  that  elliptic  functions  may  be  expected  to  have 
some  properties  analogous  to  those  of  the  circular  functions.  It  is  therefore 
natural  to  introduce  elliptic  functions  into  analysis  by  some  definition 
analogous  to  one  of  the  definitions  which  may  be  made  the  foundation 
of  the  theory  of  circular  functions. 

One  mode  of  developing  the  theory  of  the  circular  functions  is  to  start 

CO 

from  the  series      2     {z  -  ??i7r)~- ;    calling  this  series  (sin  zy^,  it  is  possible 

m=  -  CO 

to  deduce  all  the  known  properties  of  sin  z ;  the  method  of  doing  so  is  briefly 
indicated  in  ^  20-222. 


20'14-20'21]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  427 

The  analogous  method  of  founding  the  theory  of  elliptic  functions  is  to 
define  the  function  p(z)  by  the  equation* 

/  wi+ V  f  1 1  ) 

^  ^'     m.n  \(z  -  ^mm,  -  2n(02y     ( 2niQj,  +  2n(o;)^\  ' 

where  Wi,  w^  satisfy  the  conditions  laid  down  in  §§  20'1,  20*12  (III) ;  the 
summation  extends  over  all  integer  values  (positive,  negative  and  zero)  of 
m  and  n,  simultaneous  zero  values  of  m  and  n  excepted. 

For  brevity,  we  write  12,^,  n  in  place  of  2m&)i  +  2nco^,  so  that 

^  (z)  =  z-^  +  S'  {(2  -  n^,  „)-^  -  n-%]. 

m,  n 

When  m  and  n  are  such  that  |  H^^  „  |  is  large,  the  general  term  of  the 
series  defining  ^(z)  is  0  (|  n„,_  ,i  j~'*),  and  so  (§  3*4)  the  series  converges 
absolutely  and  uniformly  (with  regard  to  z)  except  near  its  poles,  namely 
the  points  D,m,n' 

Therefore  (§5*3),  ^(z)  is  analytic  throughout  the  whole  2^-plane  except 
at  the  points  n^_„,  where  it  has  double  poles. 

The  introduction  of  this  function  ^  (z)  is  due  to  Weierstrass+ ;  we  now 
proceed  to  discuss  properties  of  ^(z),  and  in  the  course  of  the  investigation 
it  will  appear  that  ^(z)  is  an  elliptic  function  with  periods  2&)i,  2<b2- 

For  purposes  of  numerical  computation  the  series  for  ^  (2)  is  useless  on  account  of  the 
slowness  of  its  convergence.  Elliptic  functions  free  from  this  defect  will  be  obtained  in 
Chapter  xxi. 

Example.     Prove  that 

20'21.     Periodicity  and  other  properties  of  <p{z). 

Since  the  series  for  ^  {z)  is  a  uniformly  convergent  series  of  analytic 
functions,  term -by-term  differentiation  is  legitimate  (§  5 '3),  and  so 


""*  m,  n  V-^        ^'"in,  n) 

The  function  g)'  {z)  is  an  odd  function  of  z ;   for,  from  the  definition  of 
^'  {z),  we  at  once  get 

<^o'{-z)==2   1  (z  +  a,,,n)-'. 

m,  n 

*  Throughout  the  chapter   S   will  be  written  to  denote  a  summation  over  all  integer  values 
m,  n 
of  VI  and  n,  a  prime  being  inserted  (S')  when  the  term  for  which  m  =  7^  =  0  has  to  be  omitted 


in,n 


from  the  summation.     It  is  also  customary  to  write  ^'  (z)  for  the  derivate  of  ^(z).     The  use  of 
the  prime  in  two  senses  will  not  cause  confusion. 

t  Werke,  11.  pp.  245-255.  The  subject-matter  of  the  greater  part  of  this  chapter  is  due  to 
Weierstrass,  and  is  contained  in  his  lectures,  of  which  an  account  has  been  published  by  Schwarz. 
See  also  Cayley,  Liouville,  x.  (1845),  and  Eisenstein,  Crelle,  xxxv,  (1847). 


428  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

But  the  set  of  points  —  n,„_  „  is  the  same  as  the  set  D,rn,  n  and  so  the 
terms  of  ^' {— z)  are  just  the  same  as  those  of  —  ^j' (z),  but  in  a  different 
order.  But,  the  series  for  ^'  (z)  being  absolutely  convergent  (§  3'4),  the 
derangement  of  the  terms  does  not  affect  its  sum,  and  therefore 

^'(-z)=-^o(z). 
In  like  manner,  the  terms  of  the  absolutely  convergent  series 

m,  n 

are  the  terms  of  the  series  '•■'■. 

m,  n  •>     .    ;. 

in  a  different  order,  and  hence  v 

i^  (-  z)  =  ^  (z) ; 
that  is  to  say,  ^(z)  is  an  even  function  of  z. 

Further,  ip' (z  +  2(o,)  =  -  2  t  (^  -  fi^,  „  +  2co^)-' ; 

but  the  set  of  points  Clm,n—  260i  is  the  same  as  the  set  flm,  n>  so  the  series 
for  ^'  (z  4-  2a)i)  is  a  derangement  of  the  series  for  g)'  {z).  The  series  being 
absolutely  convergent,  we  have 

^y{z  +  2ay,)  =  ^'{z); 

that  is  to  say,  ^'  (z)  has  the  period  2&)i ;  in  like  manner  it  has  the  period  2«d2. 

Since  ^/(^)  is  analytic  except  at  its  poles,  it  follows  from  this  result  that 
g>'  (z)  is  an  elliptic  function. 

If  now  we  integrate  the  equation  ^'  (z  +  2coi)  =  ^'  (z),  we  get 

^{z-[-2a),)  =  ^o{z)+A, 

where  A  is  constant.  Putting  z  =  —  Wi  and  using  the  fact  that  p  (z)  is  an 
even  function,  we  get  ^4  =  0,  so  that 

^{z  +  2&)i)  =  ^{z); 

in  like  manner  ^  (z  +  2co2)  =  ^  (z). 

Since  p  (z)  has  no  singularities  but  poles,  it  follows  from  these  two  results 
that  p  (z)  is  an  elliptic  function. 

There  are  other  methods  of  introducing  both  the  circular  and  elliptic  functions  into 
analysis  ;  for  the  circular  functions  the  following  may  be  noticed  : 

(1)  The  geometrical  definition  in  which  sin  z  is  the  ratio  of  the  side  opposite  the  angle 
z  to  the  hypotenuse  in  a  right-angled  triangle  of  which  one  angle  is  z.  This  is  the  definition 
given  in  elementary  text-books  on  Trigonometry ;  from  our  point  of  view  it  has  various 
disadvantages,  some  of  which  are  stated  in  the  Appendix. 

(2)  The  definition  by  the  power  series 

z^       z° 
sin.  =  .---f--.... 


2022]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  429 

(3)  The  definition  by  the  product 

(4)  The  definition  by  '  inversion '  of  an  integral 

J  0 

The  periodicity  properties  follow  easily  from  (4)  by  taking  suitable  paths  of  integration 
(cf.  Forsyth,  Theory  of  Functions,  pp.  213-222),  but  it  is  extremely  difficult  to  prove  that 
sin  z  defined  in  this  way  is  an  analytic  function. 

The  reader  will  see  later  (§§  22-82,  22*1,  20-42,  20-22  and  5^  20-53  example  4)  that 
elliptic  functions  may  be  defined  by  definitions  analogous  to  each  of  these,  with  corre- 
sponding disadvantages  in  the  cases  of  the  first  and  fourth. 

Example.  Deduce  the  periodicity  of  ^  (2)  directly  from  its  definition  as  a  double  series. 
[It  is  not  difficult  to  justify  the  necessary  derangement.] 

20*22.     The  differential  equation  satisfied  by  jp  (2). 

We  shall  now  obtain  an  equation  satisfied  by  ^  (z),  which  will  prove  to 
be  of  great  importance  in  the  theory  of  the  function. 

The  function   ^  (z)  —  z~^,  which  is  equal   to    S'  [{z  —  n,„_  „)~2  —  n~f„|,  is 

m,  n 

analytic  in  a  region  of  which  the  origin  is  an  internal  point,  and  it  is  an 
even  function  of  z.  Consequently,  by  Taylor's  theorem,  we  have  an  expansion 
of  the  form 

^  (z)  -  z-'^  =  i  g,z^-  +  ^^g,z^  +  0  (^«) 

valid  for  sufficiently  small  values  of  |  ^  ] .     It  is  easy  to  see  that 
^,  =  60  2'  n-\,    gs  =  UO  S'  n^,. 

m,  n  m,  n 

Thus  (fj  {z)  =  Z-'  +  ^^g.z-^  +  yi,z*  +  0  {z') ; 

differentiating  this  result,  we  have 

ip'{z)=-2z-'  +  ^^g,z+\g,z^+0{z% 

Cubing  and  squaring  these  respectively,  we  get 

f  {z)  =  Z-'  +  l^g.z--  +  l^g,  -f  0  {z% 

g)'=' {z)  =  4^-"  -  I g,z-"-  -^g,+  0  (z'). 

Hence  ^'^  (z)  -  4>f  (z)  =  -  g.,z-^  -g,+  0  {z% 

and  so  <p'^  {z)  -  4^j='  {z)  +  g. <p\z) -{-g-i^  0  {z% 

That  is  to  say,  the  function  y'''{z)  - '^s^^  {z) -\- g.2,<^  {z)  +  g.,,  which  is 
obviously  an  elliptic  function,  is  analytic  at  the  origin,  and  consequently 
it  is  also  analytic  at  all  congruent  points.  But  such  points  are  the  only 
possible  singularities  of  the  function,  and  so  it  is  an  elliptic  function  ivith 
no  singularities ;  it  is  therefore  a  constant  (§  20'12,  IV). 

On  making  ^-*0,  we  see  that  this  constant  is  zero. 


430  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Thus,  finally,  the  function  <^{z)  satisfies  the  differential  equation 

where  g^  and  g^  (called  the  invariants)  are  given  by  the  equations 
5r,  =  60  2'  n;;;f,„    g,  =  \^Q  2'  n-^;,. 

m,  n  m,  n 

Conversely,  given  the  equation 


{^£j  =  ^f-g.y-g., 


if  numbers  coj,  eog  can  he  determined*  such  that 

m,  n  m,n 

then  the  general  solution  of  the  differential  equation  is 

where  a  is  the  constant  of  integration.     This  may  be  seen  by  taking  a  new 
dependent  variable  u  defined  by  the  equation f  y=^<^{u),  when  the  dififerential 


equation  reduces  to  (  -i-  , 

Since  f  {z)  is  an  even  function  of  z,  we  have  y  —  ^(^z±  a),  and  so  the 
solution  of  the  equation  can  be  written  in  the  form 

y=<p{z  +  a) 
without  loss  of  generality. 

Example.     Deduce  from  the  differential  equation  that,  if 


then 


02=5-2/2^5, 

C4=.93/22.7,             ^6=5-22/24.  3.  52, 

^^"2^5. 7. 11' 

i"     25.3.53.13  '  24.72.13'      '" ~  2^.  3.  52.  7 .  11 

20*221.     The  integral  formula  for  ^  {z). 
Consider  the  equation 

/•OO 

^=j     {U'-gd-g,)-^dt, 

determining  z  in  terms  of  ^ ;  the  path  of  integration  may  be  any  curve  Avhich 
does  not  pass  through  a  zero  of  H^  —  g^t  —  g.^. 

On  differentiation,  we  get 

[dz)  =4^-^.r-^3, 

and  so  ^  —  ^j(^z  +  a), 

where  a  is  a  constant. 

*  The  difficult  problem  of  determining  Wj  and  wo  when   f/2  ^^^  9z  ^^'^  given  is   solved    in 
§  21-73. 

t  This  equation  in  u  always  has  solutions,  by  §  20-13. 


20-221, 20-222]  elliptic  functions  431 

Make  f  ^  oo  ;  then  z  --0,  since  the  integral  converges,  and  so  a  is  a  pole 
of  the  function  g> ;  Le.,  o  is  of  the  form  0.^,  n.  and  so  ^  =  ^{z+  0,^, «)  =  ^  (z). 

The  result  that  the  equation  2  =  I    {^i^—git  —  gs)      dt  is  equivalent  to 
the  equation  ^  =  ^(z)  is  sometimes  written  in  the  form 


{U'-g,t-g,)    ^dt 


20*222.     An  illustration  from  the  theory  of  the  circular  functions. 

The  theorems  obtained  in  §§  20*2-20'221  may  be  illustrated  by  the  corresponding 
results  in  the  theory  of  the  circular  functions.      Thus  we  may  deduce  the  properties 

of  the  function  cosec^z  from  the  series    2     {z  —  mn)~^  in  the  following  manner: 

jn=  — 00 

Denote  the  series  by/ (2) ;  the  series  converges  absolutely  and  uniformly*  (with  regard 
to  z)  except  near  the  points  mn  &t  which  it  obviously  has  double  pales.  Except  at  these 
points,  f{z)  is  analytic.  The  effect  of  adding  any  multiple  of  tt  to  2  is  to  give  a  series 
whose  terms  are  the  same  as  those  occurring  in  the  original  series ;  since  the  series 
converges  absolutely,  the  sum  of  the  series  is  unaffected,  and  so  f{z)  is  a  periodic  function 
of  z  with  period  re. 

Now  consider  the  behaviour  oi  f{z)  in  the  strip  for  which  —\t^R{z)^\iv.  From 
the  periodicity  of  f{z\  the  value  of  f{z)  at  any  point  in  the  plane  is  equal  to  its  value  at 
the  corresponding  point  of  the  strip.  In  the  strip  f{z)  has  one  singularity,  namely  s  =  0  ; 
and  f{z)  is  bounded  as  «-»-oo  in  the  strip,  because  the  terms  of  the  series  for /(s)  are 

small  compared  with  the  corresponding  terms  of  the  comparison  series    2'    m~'^. 

m=  —  ai 

In  a  domain  including  the  point  2  =  0,  f{z)  —  z~'^  is  analytic,  and  is  an  even  function  ; 
and  consequently  there  is  a  Macl'aurin  expansion 

f{z)-z-^=    I   a2«2^ 

?l=0 

valid  when  |  s  |  <  tt.     It  is  easily  seen  that 

a2„=27r-2»(2?i  +  l)   1   TO-2»-2, 
)« = 1 

and  so  «o=3>     02  =  677"*   2   m~'^  =  ^g. 

Hence,  for  small  values  of  \z\, 

f(z)  =  z-^  +  i^  +  ^z^  +  Oiz*). 

Differentiating  this  result  twice,  and  also  squaring  it,  we  have 

f"{z)  =  6z-*+^^  +  0{z^), 

/2(2)  =  2-4  +  ii2-2  +  U+^(2')- 

It  follows  that  /"  (z)  -  6f^  (2)  +  4/  (2)  =  0  {z'-). 

That  is  to  say,  the  function  /"  (s)  — 6/^^(2) +  4/(2)  is  analytic  at  the  origin  and  it  is 
obviously  periodic.  Since  its  only  possible  singularities  are  at  the  points  vitt,  it  follows 
from  the  periodic  property  of  the  function  that  it  is  an  integral  function. 

*  By  comparison  with  the  series     2'    m~^. 


432  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Further,  it  is  bounded  as  3-»-oo  in  the  strip  -^ir^E{z)^^7r,  since  f{z)  is  bounded 
and  so  is*  /"  (2),  Hence  /"  (z)  -  6/2  (2)  +  4/(2)  is  bounded  in  the  strip,  and  therefore  from 
its  periodicity  it  is  bounded  everywhere.  By  Liouville's  theorem  (§  5-63)  it  is  therefore 
a  constant.  By  making  2-»-0,  we  see  that  the  constant  is  zero.  Hence  the  function 
cosec2  2  satisfies  the  equation 

/"(2)  =  6/2(2)-4/(2). 

Multiplying  by  2/'  (2)  and  integrating,  we  get 

/'2(2)  =  4/2(2){/(2)-l}+C, 

where  c  is  a  constant,  which  is  easily  seen  to  be  zero  on  making  use  of  the  power  series 

for/'(2)and/(2). 

We  thence  deduce  that  2z=  i       t-^{t-l)~^dt, 

Jf(z) 

when  an  appropriate  path  of  integration  is  chosen. 

Example  1.     li  y  =  <^{z)  and  dashes  denote  differentiations  with  regard  to  2,  shew  that 

where  ej,  e^^  e^  are  the  roots  of  the  equation  4:^—0^1—0^  =  0. 
[We  have  y"^ = 4y^  —  gi,y—  g^ 

=  4(y-ei)(y-e2)(y-e3). 
Differentiating  logarithmically  and  dividing  by  y',  we  have 

r=l 

Differentiating  again,  we  have  * 

Adding  this  equation  multiplied  by  ^  to  the  square  of  the  preceding  equation, 
multiplied  by  ^\,  we  readily  obtain  the  desired  result. 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  left-hand  side  of  the  equation  is  half  the  Schwarzian 
derivative  t  of  2  with  respect  to  y  ;  and  so  2  is  the  quotient  of  two  solutions  of  the 
equation 

Example  2.    Obtain  the  '  properties  of  homogeneity '  of  the  function  ^  (2) ;  namely  that 

^  (^'  i  17)  =  ^"'^-^  i'  I  "')  '       ^  ^^"  '    ^~'32,    X-65r3)  =  X-2p(,,    g,,    ^3), 
\        !  ^0)2/  \      I  0)2/ 

where  ^yz      M  denotes  the  function  formed  with  periods  2co],  20)3  and  ^(2;  g,,,  g^) 

denotes  the  function  formed  with  invariants  g^,  g^. 

[The  former  is  a  direct  conseqtience  of  the  definition  of  ^  (2)  by  a  double  series  ;  the 
latter  may  then  be  derived  from  the  double  series  defining  the  g  invariants.] 

*  The  series  for/"  (2)  may  be  compared  with     S'     m~^. 

m=  —  oo 
t  Cayley,  Camb.  Phil.  Trans,  xiii.  p.  5. 


20-3,  20-31]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  438 

20"3.     The  addition-theorem  for  the  function  ^  {z). 

The  function  ^  {z)  possesses  what  is  known  as  an  addition-theorem ;  that 
is  to  say,  there  exists  a  formula  expressing  ^  (^^  +  3/)  as  an  algebraic  function 
of  ip  {z)  and  ^  {y)  for  general  values  *  of  2^  and  y. 

Consider  the  equations 

<p'{z)  =  Aip{z)  +  B,     ^'{y)  =  Af{y)  +  B, 

which  determine  A  and  B  in  terms  of  z  and  y  unless  ^{z)  =  f  (y),  i.e.  unless f 
z  =  ±y  (mod.  2w^,  20)2). 

Now  consider  ^'  {^)  —  Aip  {^)  —  B, 

qua  function  of  ^.  It  has  a  triple  pole  at  ^  =  0  and  consequently  it  has 
three,  and  only  three,  irreducible  zeros,  by  §  20'13 ;  the  sum  of  these  is  a 
period,  by  §  20'14,  and  as  ^=z,  ^=y  are  two  zeros,  the  third  irreducible  zero 
must  be  congruent  to  —z  —  y.  Hence  —z  —  y  isa,  zero  of  ^'  (^)  —  A^  (^)  —  B, 
and  so 

^y(-z-y)  =  A^(-z-y)  +  B. 

Eliminating  A  and  B  from  this  equation  and  the  equations  by  which  A 
and  B  were  defined,  we  have 

iJiz)  ^y{z)        1  =0. 

p(y)  f'iy)        1 

Since  the  derived  functions  occurring  in  this  result  can  be  expressed 
algebraically  in  terms  of  ^  {z),  <p  (?/),  i^d  (z  +  y)  respectively  (§  20-22),  this 
result  really  expresses  f{z-\-y)  algebraically  in  terms  of  ^  {z)  and  <p  (y). 
It  is  therefore  an  addition-theorem. 

Other  methods  of  obtaining  the  addition-theorem  are  indicated  in  §  20-311 
examples  1  and  2,  and  §  20-312. 

A  symmetrical  form  of  the  addition-theorem  may  be  noticed,  namely 
that,  if  It  -f-  V  +  w  =  0,  then 

I  io{u)     <p'{u)     1     =0. 

f  {w)    iS  (w)    1 
20'31.     Another  form  of  the  addition-theorem. 

Retaining  the  notation  of  §  20*3,  we  see  that  the  values  of  ^,  which  make 
§>'  (^)  —  A^ {^)  —  B  vanish,  are  congruent  to  one  of  the  points  z,  y,  —z  —  y. 

*  It  is,  of  course,  unnecessary  to  consider  the  special  cases  when  y,  or  z,  or  y  +  z  is  a  period. 

t  The  function  <p  [z)  -  ^  (y),  qua  function  of  z,  has  double  poles  at  points  congruent  to  z  =  0, 
and  no  other  singularities  ;  it  therefore  (§  20-13)  has  only  two  irreducible  zeros  ;  and  the  points 
congruent  to  2=  ±j/  therefore  give  all  the  zeros  of  ^  (2)  -  ip  (y). 

\V.   M.   A.  28 


434  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Hence  ^'^(^)  —  {A^  (f)  +  B\^  vanishes  when  ^  is  congruent  to  any  of  the 
points  z,  y,  —z  —  y.     And  so 

^f  (0  -  -4^^^  iO  -  (2AB  +  g,)  ^  (0  -(B^+  gs) 

vanishes  when  ^(^)  is  equal  to  any  one  of  ^i>(z),  ^{y),  fiz  +y). 

For  general  values  of  z  and  y,  ^  {z),  f  (y)  and  ^(z  +  y)  are  unequal  and 
so  they  are  all  the  roots  of  the  equation 

4>Z'  -  A'Z'  -  (2AB  +  g,)Z-(B'  +  g,)  =  0. 

Consequently,  by  the  ordinary  formula  for  the  sum  of  the  roots  of  a  cubic 
equation, 

and  so  p (^  +  2/)  =  i  {j^^^y)\ "  ^ (^)  "  ^ (2/)' 

on  solving  the  equations  by  which  A  and  B  were  defined. 

This  result  expresses  ^j  (z  +  y)  explicitly  in  terms  of  functions  of  z  and 
of  y. 

20*311.     The  duplication  formula  for  ^  {z). 

The  forms  of  the  addition-theorem  which  have  been  obtained  are  both 
nugatory  when  y  =  z.  But  the  result  of  §  20"81  is  true  in  the  case  of  any 
given  value  of  z,  for  general  values  of  y.  Taking  the  limiting  form  of  the 
result  when  y  approaches  z,  we  have 

lim  &(z  +  y)  =  \  lim  \^  ,{~A^l\  -  <^  (z)  -  Hm  <a  (y). 
JFrom  this  equation,  we  see  that,  if  2z  is  not  a  period,  we  have 

on  applying  Taylor's  theorem  to  ^(z  +  h),  ^'  (z  +  h);  and  so 

unless  2z  is  a  period.     This  result  is  called  the  duplication  formula. 
Example  1.     Prove  that 

l|F_(!)^E(y)|^  .,(,)_. ,(,+3,), 
4l^(^)-^(.?/)/       ^^^     ^  ^  ^-^^^ 

qua  function  of  z,  has  no  singularities  at  points  congruent  with  2  =  0,  ±  y  ;  and,  by  naaking 
use  of  Liouville's  theorem,  deduce  the  addition-theorem. 


\ 


20-311,  20-312]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  435 

Example  2.     Apply  the  process  indicated  in  example  1  to  the  function 

and  deduce  the  addition-theorem. 
Example  3.     Shew  that 

P(^+y)  +  ^(':-y)  =  {&{z)-&{l/)}-n{^iP(z)ip(^)-y,}{ipiz)  +  ip(i/)}-g3l 
[By  the  addition-theorem  we  have 

Replacing  ^2(2)  and  iP'H^)  by  4^3(2)-5'2g>(2)-5'3  and  4.^^  (;!/)- 92  ^  (^)  -  ff3  respec- 
tively, and  reducing,  we  obtain  the  required  result.] 

Example  4.     Shew,  by  Liouville's  theorem,  that 

j^{iP(^-o^)P{z-b)}=^{a-b){^'{z-a)  +  ^'{z-b)}-^(a-h){^{z-a)-ip{z-b)}. 

(Trinity,  1905.) 
20*312.     Abel's*  method  of  proving  the  addition-theorem  for  ^(z). 

The  following  outline  of  a  method  of  establishing  the  addition-theorem  for  ^  (2)  is 
instructive,  though  a  completely  rigorous  proof  would  be  long  and  tedious. 

Let  the  invariants  of  ^  (2)  be  g^,  gz;  take  rectangular  axes  OX,  OF  in  a  plane,  and 
consider  the  intersections  of  the  cubic  curve 

with  a  variable  line  y  =  mx-\-n. 

If  any  point  (xx ,  yi)  be  taken  on  the  cubic,  the  equation  in  z 

ip{z)-x,  =  Q 
has  two  solutions  -\-Zx,  —Zi  (§  20-13)  and  all  other  solutions  are  congruent  to  these  two. 

Since  ^'^{z)  =  'i^^iz)—gi^{z)-gz,  we  have  <^"^  {z)=yi  ;  choose  z^  to  be  the  solution  for 
which  gJ'  (2i)=  +yi,  not  -y^. 

A  number  Si  thus  chosen  will  be  called  the  parameter  of  (^1 ,  yi)  on  the  cubic. 

Now  the  abscissae  x^,  x^,  x^  of  the  intersections  of  the  cubic  with  the  variable  line 
are  the  roots  of 

0  {x)  =  4.-^ —g-i^-g^-  ("i-^ + ^0^ = '^> 
and  so  ^  (x)  =  4  (^  —  .ri)  (^  -  x-i)  {x  -  X3). 

The  variation  S^,.  in  one  of  these  abscissae  due  to  the  variation  in  position  of  the  line 
consequent  on  small  changes  bm,  hi  in  the  coefficients  m,  n  is  given  by  the  equation 

d)'  (.^v)  S^r  +  ^  3'"  +  5^  Sn  =  0, 

^  ^  cm  on 

and  so  ^'  (o-v)  bx^ = 2  {mx^.  +  n)  {x^  hn  4-  S?i), 

3       g^.  3    Xrbm  +  bn 

whence  2 —  =22   ^-ttt — r— , 

,.=1  mXr-\-n        ,.=1     <p  [Xr) 

provided  that  Xi,  x^,  x^  are  unequal,  so  that  (f)'  (x^)  =/=0. 

*  See  Abel,  Oeuvres,  i.  pp.  145-211. 

28—2 


436  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Now,  if  we  put  x{x8m  +  8n)l(j)  {x\  qua  function  of  x,  into  partial  fractions,  the  result  is 

3 

2    A^/{x  —  Xfj^ 
where  Ar=  lim  x(x8m  +  8n)         ^ 

=Xr{Xr87)i  +  8n)  lim  (x-Xr)/(l){x) 

x-*-Xr 

=  Xr  {Xj.8m + 8n)l(f>'  {x^), 
by  Taylor's  theorem. 

3  3 

Putting  ^  =  0,  we  get  2   8xrl^r  =  ^,   i-^-     ^   §2^=0- 

r=l  r=l 

That  is  to  say,  the  sum  of  the  parameters  of  the  points  of  intersection  is  a  constant 
independent  of  the  position  of  the  line. 

Vary  the  line  so  that  all  the  points  of  intersection  move  off  to  infinity  (no  two  points 
coinciding  during  this  process),  and  it  is  evident  that  Zi+z^  +  Zz  is  equal  to  the  sum  of  the 
parameters  when  the  line  is  the  line  at  infinity  ;  but  when  the  line  is  at  infinity,  each 
parameter  is  a  period  of  ^  (z)  and  therefore  2, +23 +  23  is  a  period  of  ip  (z). 

Hence  the  sum  of  the  parameters  of  three  collinear  points  on  the  cubic  is  congruent  to 
zero.  This  result  having  been  obtained,  the  determinantal  form  of  the  addition-theorem 
follows  as  in  §  20'3. 

20'32.     The  constants  e^,  e^,  e^. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  ^  (&)i),  ^  {w-^,  g>  (ws),  (where  0)3  =  —  &>i  —  twa),  are 
all  unequal ;  and  if  their  values  be  gj,  e<i,  e-i,  then  gj,  e^,  e.^  are  the  roots  of  the 
equation  H^  —  g2t  —  (^3  =  0. 

First  consider  ip'  (w^).     Since  ^/  (z)  is  an  odd  periodic  function,  we  have 
^y  (coi)  =  -  ^d'  (-  6)1)  =  -  ^/  (2a)i  -  ft)i)  =  -  ^'  (toi), 
and  so  ^'  (wj)  =  0. 

Similarly  ^'  (co^)  =  ^'  (ws)  =  0. 

Since  ^'  (z)  is  an  elliptic  function  whose  only  singularities  are  triple  poles 
at  points  congruent  to  the  origin,  ^./  (z)  has  three,  and  only  three  (§  20'13), 
irreducible  zeros.     Therefore  the  only  zeros  of  ^'  {z)  are  points  congruent  to 

COj,    &)2,    COs. 

Next  consider  ^  (z)  —  e-^.  This  vanishes  at  coi  and,  since  ^y  (&>i)  =  0,  it  has 
a  double  zero  at  cOi.  Since  p(z)  has  only  two  irreducible  poles,  it  follows 
from  §  20"13  that  the  only  zeros  of  ^){z)—ei  are  congruent  to  oji.  In  like 
manner,  the  only  zeros  of  ^j  (z)  -  e^,  ^J  {z)  —  e-^  are  double  zeros  at  points  con- 
gruent to  CO2,  co;i  respectively. 

Hence  Ci^e^i^  e-i.  For  if  gj  =  e..,  then  tp  {z)  —  e^  has  a  zero  at  tos^  which  is 
a  point  not  congruent  to  coj. 

Also,  since  ^'-{z)  =  A^<^d^{z)  — g,^^{z)  — g,,  and  since  ^/(2')  vanishes  at  tuj,  CO2, 
(03,  it  follows  that  4gj»  (z)  -  g^ip  {z)  —  g.^  vanishes  when  |^i>  {z)  =  e^,  gg  or  63. 

That  is  to  say,  e^,  e.,,  e^  are  the  roots  of  the  equation 

4>t'-g,t-g,  =  0. 


20-32,  20*33]  elliptic  functions  .  437 

From  the  well-known  formulae  connecting  roots  of  equations  with  their 

coefficients,  it  follows  that 

61  +  6^  +  63  =  0, 

_     1 
6263  +  6361  +  616.2  —     ^9^' 

_  1 
616263  —  j^j. 

*  Example  1.     When  ^2  and  gg  are  real  and  the  discriminant  ^2^  -  ^^^ffs^  is  positive,  shew 
that  ei,  62,  63  are  all  real ;  choosing  them  so  that  Cj  >e2>e3,  shew  that 

/oo 

and  0)3=  - ^•  [  '    {gs+g-it- ^t^)  ~^dt, 

so  that  0)1  is  real  and  0)3  a  pure  imaginary. 

'■  Example  2.     Shew  that,  in  the  circumstances  of  example  1,  ^{z)  is  real  on  the  peri- 
meter of  the  rectangle  whose  corners  are  0,  6)3,  (Ui  +  wg,  a^. 

20 'SS.     The  addition  of  a  half-period  to  the  argument  of  <^  (z). 
From  the  form  of  the  addition-theorem  given  in  §  20'31,  we  have 

3 

and  so,  since  ^J'2(3)  =  4  n  {^(z)-er}, 

r=l 

we  have  j,(,+„,)  =  <-*''^^-^f/*|^^^ -«-«-«„ 

3 
on  using  the  result  2  6^  =  0  ; 

r=l 

this  formula  expresses  ^{z  +  (Oi)  in  terms  of  p{z). 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

^(ia)i)  =  ei±{(ei-e2)(ei-e3)}i 

Example  2.     From  the  formula  for  ip{z  +  a)i)  combined  with  the  result  of  example  1, 

shew  that 

i^  (ioi  +  C02)  =  61  +  {(ei  -  62)  («!  -  63)}*. 

(Math.  Trip.  1913.) 

Example  3.     Shew  that  the  value  of  i^' {z)^' (z  +  <oi)  ^' (z  +  ati)  ^' {z+oi^)  is  equal  to 
the  discriminant  of  the  equation  At^  —  g2t—g3  =  0. 

[Differentiating  the  result  of  §  20'33,  we  have 
from  this  and  analogous  results,  we  have 

P'  (2)  ^y  (2  -t-  coi)  ^'  {z + 0)2)  f  (2  -h  o>3) 

=  {ei  -  e^2)'  {^2  -  <^^?  («3  -  e,f  <^0'^  {z)  n^  {^  (z)  -  e,}  -  ^ 
=  lG{e,-e2)He2-e,f{es-ei)% 
which  is  the  discriminant  g/  —  27g%  in  question.] 


438  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

^'  (|a)i)  =  -  2  {(ei  -  62)  (^1  -  «3)}*  {(ei  -  e^)^  +  (ei  -  63)^}- 

(Math.  Trip.  1913.) 

Example  5.     Shew  that,  with  appropriate  interpretations  of  the  radicals, 

{^  {2z)  -  e.,}i  {^  (22)  -  es}i  +  {^  {2z)  -  e^}^  {g>  {2z)  -  ^i}* 

+  {^  {2z)  -  e,]^  {^  (22)  -  e,}i  =  ^  (2)  -  g>  (22). 

20-4.     Quasi-periodic  functions.     The  function*  ^  (z). 

We  shall  next  introduce  the  function  ^(z)  defined  by  the  equation 

coupled  with  the  condition  lim  {^(z)  —  z-'^]  =  0. 

z-*0 

Since  the  series  for  ^  (z)  -  z'^-  converges  uniformly  throughout  any 
domain  from  which  the  neighbourhoods  of  the  pointsf  Q>'rn,n  are  excluded,  we 
may  integrate  term-by- term  (§  4*7 )  and  get 

^{z)-z-^  =  -r{&{^)-^-']dz 

J  0 

=  -    S'     f{{z-nrr,,n)-'-^;:n]dz, 
m,n  J  0 

1  ^,    f  1  1  2 


and  so  ^(z)  =  -  +    f  ] 7^ 1-  j^ —  +  ^2 

^  m,n    1-2'        ^^m,n        ^^m,n        ^^m,n) 

The  reader  will  easily  see  that  the  general  term  of  this  series  is 

Odn^.nl"')  as  |n^,n|-*oo; 

and  hence  (cf  §  20"2),  ^(z)  is  an  analytic  function  of  z  over  the  whole  ^-plane 
except  at  simple  poles  (the  residue  at  each  pole  being  +  1)  at  all  the  points 
of  the  set  n„i_„. 

It  is  evident  that 

-^(-z)  =  l+  t'  l-^^^-  -  J-  +  ^1  , 

Z        m,n   (Z -r  i-'"m,n        ^^m,n        ^^m,n) 

and  as  this  series  consists  of  the  terms  of  the  series  for  ^(z),  deranged  in  the 
same  way  as  in  the  corresponding  series  of  §  20"21,  we  have,  by  §  2'52, 

!:(-z)=-^(z), 

that  is  to  say,  ^(z)  is  an  odd  function  of  z. 

*  This  function  should  not,  of  course,  be  confused  with  the  Zeta-function  of  Eiemann, 
discussed  in  Chapter  xiii. 

t  The  symbol  fl',„,„  is  used  to  denote  all  the  points  fl„,.„  with  the  exception  of  the  origin 
(cf.  §  20-2). 


20-4-20-4]l]  ELLIPTIC  FUNCTIONS  439 

Following  up  the  analogy  of  §  20-222,  we  may  compare  ({z)  with  the  function  cot  2 

°°  d 

defined   by  the  series  z~'^+    2'    {(2-m7r)~^  +  (m7r)~'},  the  equation   -j- cot z=  - cos&c^ z 

corresponding  to  -r- C  {^)  =  ~  &  i^)- 

20'41.     The  quasi-periodicity  of  the  function  ^  (z). 

The  heading  of  §  20*4  was  an  anticipation  of  the  result,  which  will  now  be 
proved,  that  ^(z)  is  not  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  z ;  and  the  effect  on 
^(z)  of  increasing  z  by  2ci)i  or  by  2(02  will  be  considered.  It  is  evident  from 
§  2012  (III)  that  ^{z)  cannot  be  an  elliptic  function,  in  view  of  the  fact  that 
the  residue  of  ^{z)  at  every  pole  is  +  1. 

If  now  we  integrate  the  equation 

^(z  +  2ft)i)  =  ^  (z), 

we  get  ^{z+2(o,)=^(z)+2v^, 

where  27;i  is  the  constant  introduced  by  integration;  putting  z  =  —  (Oi,  and 
taking  account  of  the  fact  that  ^{z)  is  an  odd  function,  we  have 

In  like  manner,  ?(^  +  Scoj)  =  f  (z)  +  2r}2, 

where  V2  =  ^((^d- 

Example  1.     Prove  by  Liouville's  theorem  that,  if  x+y-\-z=0,  then 

{c(^)+f(3/)+a^)F+r(^)+r(y)+r(2)=o. 

(Frobenius  u.  Stickelberger,  Crelle,  lxxxviii.) 
[This  result  is  a  pseudo-addition  theorem.      It  is  not  a  true  addition-theorem  since 

C'{x),  f'(y),  C  {z)  are  not  algebraic  functions  of  ({x\  ^(y),  ({z).] 

Example  2.     Prove  by  Liouville's  theorem  that 


2i  1     iO{x)     i^^{x) 

-r 

1     ^{x)     i^'{x) 

=  C{^^+y+z)-C{x)-({y)-az). 

1    ^{y)   r(^) 

1    <P{y)   f'iy) 

1     i^{z)     ia2(2) 

1  <^{z)  r(^) 

Obtain  a  generalisation  of  this  theorem  involving  n  variables. 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

20"411.     The  relation  between  rji  and  rj^. 

We  shall  now  shew  that 

1     . 
^i&>2  -  V2<Oi  =^7rt. 


To  obtain  this  result  consider       ^(z)dz  taken  round  the  boundary  of  a 

J  c 

cell.     There  is  one  pole  of  ^(z)  inside  the  cell,  the  residue  there  being  -f-  1. 

Hence       ^(z)dz  =  27ri. 
i  c 


440  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Modifying  the  contour  integral  in  the  manner  of  §  20-12,  we  get 

27ri=  I         {^{z)  -  ^{z+2o),)]  dz  -  {^(z)  -^{z  +  2co,)]  dz 

.'  t  -It 

=  -  2r),  dt  +  277i  dt, 

and  so  2Tri  =  —  ^rj^w^  +  47;ia)2, 

which  is  the  required  result. 

20-42.     The  function  a  {z). 

We  shall  next  introduce  the  function  a  {z),  defined  by  the  equation 

j^\oga{z)=^{z) 

coupled  with  the  condition  lim  {a{z)/z}  =  1. 

On  account  of  the  uniformity  of  convergence  of  the  series  for  ^(z),  except 
near  the  poles  of  ^(z),  we  may  integrate  the  series  term-by- terra.  Doing  so, 
and  taking  the  exponential  of  each  side  of  the  resulting  equation,  we  get 

.       .(.)  =  . n'|(i-^)expr^  +?^)[' 

the  constant  of  integration  has  been  adjusted  in  accordance  with  the  condition 
stated. 

By  the  methods  employed  in  §§  20-2,  20-21,  20-4,  the  reader  will  easily 
obtain  the  following  results : 

(I)  The  product  for  a  {z)  converges  absolutely  and  uniformly  in  any 
bounded  domain  of  values  of  z. 

(II)  The  function  a  {z)  is  an  odd  integral  function  of  z  with  simple  zeros 
at  all  the  points  n,„_„. 

The  function  a  {z)  may  be  compared  with  the  function  sin  z  defined  by 
the  product 


z    n'    jfl-— ^e^/u«-)l 

m=-aoiV  tniTJ  J 


d  .  d 

the  relation  -y-  log  sin  z  =  cot  z  corresponding  to  y-  log  a  {z)  =  ^{z). 

20-421.     The  quasi-periodicity  of  the  function  a  {z). 
If  we  integrate  the  equation 

C(^  +  2a,0=C(^)+^'7i, 
we  get  or(2  + 2&)i)=- ce-'''-o-(^), 

where  c  is  the  constant  of  integration;  to  determine  c,  we  put  z  =  —  w^,  and 
then 

a  (coj)  =  —  ce~-''i"''  a  (wi). 


20-42-2051]  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  441 

Consequently  c  =  — e-'''"', 

and  a-(z  +  2a)i)  =  -  e^^  (^+"')  a-  (z). 

In  like  manner       (t{z  +  2co2)  =  —  e2^s(«+"2)  o-  (z). 

These  results  exhibit  the  behaviour  of  (t{z)  when  z  is  increased  by  a 
period  of  ^  (z). 

If,  as  in  §  20-32,  j^ve  write  0)3-=  —  (o^-  a)^,  then  three  other  Sigraa-functions 
are  defined  by  the  equations 

ar  (z)  =  e-'"-^  a{z  +  Q)r)/<T  {(Or)  (v  =  1,  2,  3). 

The  four  Sigma-functions  are  analogous  to  the  four  Theta-functions  dis- 
cussed in  Chapter  xxi  (see  §  2 19). 

*  Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  m  and  n  are  any  integers, 

(r(z  +  2ma>i  +  2na2)  =  (-)"'*"  o-  (z)  exp  {(2OTr;i  +  2nT}2)  2  +  2m^riia>i  +  4m7i?/i<B2  +  2%2,^^ 0)2}, 
and  deduce  that  rjico^  — ^201  is  an  integer  multiple  of  ^ni. 

•  Example  2.     Shew  that,  if  5'  =  exp(7ria)2/<»i))  so  that  |5'|<1,  and  if 

then  F{z)  is  an  integral  function  with  the  same  zeros  as  a{z)  and  also  F{z)I(t{z)  is  a 
doubly-periodic  function  of  z  with  periods  2o)i,  2w2. 

«  Example  3.     Deduce  from  example  2,  by  using  Liouville's  theorem,  that 

Example  4.  Obtain  the  result  of  example  3  by  expressing  each  foctor  on  the  right  as 
a  singly  infinite  product. 

20"5.  Formulae  expressing  any  elliptic  function  in  terms  of  Weiersti'assian 
functions  with  the  same  periods. 

There  are  various  formulae  analogous  to  the  expression  of  any  rational 
fraction  as  (I)  a  quotient  of  two  sets  of  products  of  linear  factors,  (II)  a  sum 
of  partial  fractions ;  of  the  first  type  there  are  two  formulae  involving  Sigma- 
functions  and  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions  respectively ;  of  the  second 
type  there  is  a  formula  involving  derivates  of  Zeta-functions.  These  formulae 
will  now  be  obtained. 

20-51.     The  expression  of  any  elliptic  function  in  ter-ms  of  ^  (z)  and  f'  {z). 

'Lat  f{z)  be  any  elliptic  function,  and, let  <p{z)  be  the  Weierstrassian 
elliptic  function  formed  with  the  same  periods  2&)3,  2&)2. 

We  first  write 


442  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

The  functions 

are  both  even  functions,  and  they  are  obviously  elliptic  functions  ■wheny"(^^)  is 
an  elliptic  function. 

The  solution  of  the  problem  before  us  is  therefore  effected  if  we  can 
express  any  even  elliptic  function  <f)  (z),  say,  in  terms  of  g)  {z). 

Let  a  be  a  zero  of  <^  {z)  in  any  cell ;  then  the  point  in  the  cell  congruent 
to  —  a  will  also  be  a  zero.  The  irreducible  zeros  of  <^  {z)  may  therefore  be 
arranged  in  two  sets,  say  a^,  a^,  ...  «„  and  certain  points  congruent  to  —  aj, 

—  (Xqj     ...  —  Ctjl- 

In  like  manner,  the  irreducible  poles  may  be  arranged  in  two  sets,  say 
61,  62,  ...  hn,  and  certain  points  congruent  io  —h^,  —h.,,  ...  —  bn. 

Consider  now  the  function* 

1      fj  \iJ(z)-^(ar) 

(fi(z),.^-,\^j{z)-^j(br) 

It  is  an  elliptic  function  of  z,  and  clearly  it  has  no  poles ;  for  the  zeros  of 
(f)  (z)  are  zeros f  of  the  numerator  of  the  product,  and  the  zeros  of  the 
denominator  of  the  product  are  polesf  of  (f){z).  Consequently  by  Liouville's 
theorem  it  is  a  constant,  A^,  say. 

Therefore  </>  (.)  =  A.  11  I^Mnf  M  , 

that  is  to  say,  (f>  (z)  has  been  expressed  as  a  rational  function  of  g?  (z). 

Carrying  out  this  process  with  each  of  the  functions 

f(z)  +/(-  z),     {f{z)  -/(-  z)}  {^y  {z)]-\ 

we  obtain  the  theorem  that  any  elliptic  function  f{z)  can  he  expressed  in  terms 
of  the  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions  ^j  (z)  and  p'  (z)  with  the  same  periods, 
the  expression  being  rational  in  ^(z)  and  linear  in  ^'  (z). 

2052.  llie  expression  of  any  elliptic  function  as  a  linear  combination  of 
Zeta-f  unctions  and  their  derivates. 

Let  f(z)  be  any  elliptic  function  with  periods  2mi,  2&)2.  Let  a  set  of 
irreducible  poles  of  f{z)  be  a^,  tta,  ...  a„,  and  let  the  principal  part  (§  5'61) 
of  f{z)  near  the  pole  a^  be 

(^k,  1       ,  (^k,  2         ,  ,         ^k,  rjc 


z  -  a^      {z-  ajcf      '  '      {2-  akY" 

*  If  any  one  of  the  points  a,,  or  b^  is  congruent  to  the  origin,  we  omit  the  corresponding 
factor  ^  (2)  -  g?  (a;}  or  ^J  (z)  -  ^  (6^).  The  zero  (or  pole)  of  the  product  and  the  zero  (or  pole) 
of  4>  {z)  at  the  origin  are  then  of  the  same  order  of  multiplicity.  In  this  product,  and  in  that  of 
§  20-.53,  factors  corresponding  to  multiple  zeros  and  poles  have  to  be  repeated  the  appropriate 
number  of  times. 

t  Of  the  same  order  of  multiplicity. 


20-52, 20-53]  elliptic  functions  443 

Then  we  can  shew  that 

d' 
where  A^  is  a  constant,  and  f<*'  (z)  denotes  -y-^  ^(z)- 

Denoting  the  summation  on  the  right  by  F  (z),  we  see  that 

F(z  +  2a),)-F{z)=  t  2viCk,u 

k  =  l 

by  §  20-41,  since  all  the  derivates  of  the  Zeta-functions  are  periodic. 

n 

But  S  Ca;  1  is  the  sum  of  the  residues  of  f(z)  at  all  of  its  poles  in  a  cell, 
and  is  consequently  (§  20-12)  zero. 

Therefore  F(z)  has  period  2(Oj,  and  similarly  it  has  period  2&)2;  and  so 
f(z)  —  F{z)  is  an  elliptic  function. 

Moreover  F  (z)  has  been  so  constructed  that  f(z)  —  F  (z)  has  no  poles  at 
the  points  a^,  a2,  ...a„;  and  hence  it  has  no  poles  in  a  certain  cell.  It  is 
consequently  a  constant,  -4 2,  by  Liouville's  theorem. 

Thus  the  function  f  (z)  can  be  expanded  in  the  form 

A,^X   t  ^-~^,Ck,,K''-''{^-(ik\ 

k  =  \s=\  \S—  \.)\ 

This  result  is  of  importance  in  the  problem  of  integrating  an  elliptic 
function /(^)  when  the  principal  part  of  its  expansion  at  each  of  its  poles  is 
known ;  for  we  obviously  have 


/ 


f{z)dz=A^z-V  S 

A;=l 


CA,il0g0r(2:-a;(.) 


«  =  2  \P  ~  ^)  ■ 


where  (7  is  a  constant  of  integration. 
»    Example.     Shew  by  the  method  of  this  article  that 

r(^)=*r(^)+T^5'2, 

and  deduce  that 

where  C  is  a  constant  of  integration. 

20*53.     The  expression  of  any  elliptic  function  as  a  quotient  of  Sigma- 
f unctions. 

Let  f{z)  be  any  elliptic  function,  with  periods  2&),  and  2&)o,  and  let  a  set 
of  irreducible  zeros  oi  f{z)  be  a^,  a.,,  ...  a«.     Then  Q  20-14)  we  can  choose  a 


444  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

set  of  poles  b^,  b^,  ...  ba  such  that  all  poles  oi  f{z)  are  congruent  to  one  or 
other  of  them  andf 

tti  +  C/a  +  . . .  +  ttn  =  &i  +  62  +  .  •  •  +  ^w 

Consider  now  the  function 

n  °"^^~^^\ 

r^l<T{z-br)' 

This  product  obviously  has  the  same  poles  and  zeros  as  f{z)\  also  the 
effect  of  increasing  z  by  2w^  is  to  multiply  the  function  by 

^  exp  [Itj,  (z  -  ar)}  _  ^ 
r=l  exp  {277i  {z  -  br)} 

The  function  therefore  has  period  2fWi  (and  in  like  manner  it  has  period 
2(1)2),  and  so  the  quotient 

/{z}-:-  n      -~ r-: 

r=l  O-  (^Z  —  Or) 

is  an  elliptic  function  with  no  zeros  or  poles.    By  Liouville's  theorem,  it  must 
be  a  constant,  A^  say. 

Thus  the  function  f{z)  can  be  expressed  in  the  form 

r  =  \  (T  {Z  —  Or) 

An  elliptic  function  is  consequently  determinate  (save  for  a  multiplicative 
constant)  when  its  periods  and  a  set  of  irreducible  zeros  and  poles  are 
known. 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

Example  2.     Deduce  by  differentiation,  from  example  1,  that 

and  by  further  differentiation  obtain  the  addition-theorem  for  ^  (2). 
Example  .3.     If    2  a,.=   2  b„  shew  that 


r=l 


I        (r{a^ -  hi)  o- {ar - h^)  ...a^ar-bj      ^ ^ 
r=i  o"  (%  —  «!)  a-icir-a^  ...  ^...  (r{ar  —  an)        ' 

the  *  denoting  that  the  vanishing  factor  a{ar-ar)  is  to  be  omitted. 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

^J(,r)-e,=  tr,.2(2)V(2)  (^-=1,2,3). 

[It  is  customary  to  define  {^J(z)-e,]^  to  mean  o-,.  (2)/o- (2),  not  -  (Tr  (z) I o- (z).] 

t  Multiple  zeros  or  poles  are,  of  course,  to  be  reckoned  according  to  their  degree  of  multi- 
plicity ;  to  determine  h^  ,h,,  ...  6„  ,  we  choose  hi,h.,,  ...h^^i,  h.^'  to  be  the  set  of  poles  in  the  cell  in 
which  rti,  02.  •••  <in  lie,  and  then  choose  h,^,  congruent  to  V>  i"  such  a  way  that  the  required 
equation  is  satisfied. 


20-54,  20-6]  ELLIPTIC  FUNCTIONS  445 

Example  5.     Establish  the  *  three-term  equation,'  namely, 

o- (2  +  a)  o- (2- a)  o- (5  + c)(r  (6- c)  +  o- (2  + 6)  or  (2- 6)  o-(c  +  «)<r(c- a) 

+  (r{z  +  c)(T{z-c)(T{a-\-h)  (r{a-b)-=0. 

20*54.     The  connexion  between  any  two  elliptic  functions  with  the  same 
periods. 

We  shall  now  prove  the  important  result  that  aa  algebraic  relation  exists 
between  any  two  elliptic  functions,  f{z)  and  (f>  (z),  with  the  same  periods. 

For,  by  §  20*51,  we  can  express /(^)  and  (f)(z)  as  rational  functions  of  the 
Weierstrassian  functions  ^  (2:)  and  ^' (z)  with  the  same  periods,  so  that 

f(z)  =  R,  {p  (z),  ^y  {z)],         4>  {z)  =  R,  [<p  (z),  gy  (z)}, 
where  R^  and  R^  denote  rational  functions  of  two  variables. 

Eliminating  gJ  (z)  and  ^'  (z)  algebraically  from  these  two  equations  and 

^"  (^)  =  4^'  (^)  -  92  p  (^)  -  gs, 

we  obtain  an  algebraic  relation  connecting /(2^)  and  (f>  (z);  and  the  theorem 
is  proved. 

A  particular  case  of  the  proposition  is  that  every  elliptic  function  is  con- 
nected with  its  derivate  by  an  algebraic  relation. 

If  now  we  take  the  orders  of  the  elliptic  functions/ (2')  and  0  (z)  to  be  m 
and  n  respectively,  then,  corresponding  to  any  given  value  of  f{z)  there  is 
(§  20'13)  a  set  of  m  irreducible  values  of  2^,  and  consequently  there  are  m 
values  (in  general  distinct)  of  <^  (z).  So,  corresponding  to  each  value  of/,  there 
are  m  values  of  (f)  and,  similarly,  to  each  value  of  <^  correspond  n  values  of  /. 

The  relation  between /(2)  and  ^(2)  is  therefore  (in  general)  of  degree  m 
in  (p  and  n  in/. 

The  relation  may  be  of  lower  degree.  Thus,  iff{z)  =  ^0  (2),  of  order  2,  and 
(f)  (2:)  =  ^0-  (z),  of  order  4,  the  relation  is/^  =  cj). 

As  an  illustration  of  the  general  result  takef{z)  =  'p(z),  of  order  2,  and 
(f)  (^z)  =  (/  (z),  of  order  3.  The  relation  should  be  of  degree  2  in  cf)  and  of 
degree  3  in/;  this  is,  in  ftict,  the  case,  for  the  relation  is  (f)-  =  4f^ "  Q^f—  g^- 

Example.  If  u,  v,  w  are  three  elliptic  functions  of  their  argument  of  the  second  order 
with  the  same  periods,  shew  that,  in  general,  there  exist  two  distinct  relations  which  are 
linear  in  each  of  m,  v,  w,  namely 

A  UVW  +  B  vw  +  C  ^m  +  D  uv->r E u  +  F  V  +  0  w  +  H  =0, 
A'uvw  +  B'vw+C'ivu  +  D'uv-\-E'ii.  +  F'v+G\u-{-H'  =  0, 
where  A,  B,  ...,  H'  are  constants. 

20*6.     On  the  integration  of  [uoX^+A^a^x^  +  Qa.,x-  +  4<a-iX  +  ttj}  ~K 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  certain  problems  of  integration,  which  are 
insoluble  by  means  of  elementary  functions  only,  can  be  solved  by  the  intro- 
duction of  the  function  ^J  (z). 


446  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Let    ttoos*  +  4iaia^  +  Qa^af  +  4ia3X  +  Ui  =  f  (x)    be    any   quartic   polynomial 
which  has  no  repeated  factors ;   and  let  its  invariants*  be 

^2  =  aotti  —  4aia3  +  Sag^    • 

^3  =  a^a^a^  +  ^a^a^a^  —  Uz^  —  aotts^  —  ai^a^. 

Let  z  =  I    {/(t)}  ~  ^  dt,  where  cc^  is  any  root  of  the  equation  /(x)  =  0  ;  then, 

J  x„ 

if  the  function  p  (z)  be  constructed  f  with  the  invariants  g2  and  g^,  it  is  possible 
to  express  x  as  a  rational  function  of^{z;g^,  g^. 

[Note.  The  reason  for  assuming  that  f{x)  has  no  repeated  factors  is  that,  when  f{x) 
has  a  repeated  factor,  the  integration  can  be  effected  with  the  aid  of  circular  or  logarithmic 
functions  only.    For  the  same  reason,  the  case  in  which  ao=ai=0  need  not  be  considered.] 

By  Taylor's  theorem,  we  have 

f{t)  =  ^A,  (t  -  X,)  +  6^2  (t  -  ooo)'  +  4A,  (t  -  ^o)'  +  Aoit-  x,y, 
(since /(a?o)  =  0),  where 

Ao  =  ao,     A^  =  aoXo  +  ai, 

A2  =  aoXfi^  +  2aiiro  +  ao, 
Ag  =  a^x^  +  SajiCo^  +  Saa^o  +  a^. 
On  writing  {t  —  Xq)-^  =  t,  (a;  -  x„)-^  =  |,  we  have 

2=1    {4>AsT'+6A,T'  +  4A,T+A,}-^dT. 

To  remove  the  second  term  in  the  cubic  involved,  write| 

and  we  get 

The  reader  will  verify,  without  difficulty,  that 

SA^^-^A^As  and   2A,A,A,- A.f  -  AoA,' 

are  respectively  equal  to  g.,  and  g„  the  invariants  of  the  original  quartic 
and  so 

s=iJ(2;g.„gs). 

Now  x  =  Xo  +  A,{s-^A,}-\ 

and  hence  ^  =  ^o  +  if'{xo){^(z;g„g,)-^^^f"(x,)]-\ 

so  that  X  has  been  expressed  as  a  rational  function  of  ^0  (z;  g^,  g^). 

*  Burnside  and  Panton,  Theory  of  Equations,  u.  p.  113. 
t  See  §21-73. 

+  This   substitution    is  legitimate   siuce  J3  +  O;    for   the    equation   ^3  =  0  involves  f{x)  =  0 
having  x^^^x^  as  a  repeated  root. 


20-7]  •  ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  447 

This  formula  for  x  is  to  be  regarded  as  the  integral  equivalent  of  the 
relation 


Example  1.     With  the  notation  of  this  article,  shew  that 

{ 
'  Example  2.     Shew  that  if 


J  a 


where  a  is  ajiy  constant,  not  necessarily  a  zero  of /(a?),  and  f{x)  is  a  quartic  polynomial 
with  no  repeated  factors,  then 

^-^  I  {/(«#r(^)+i/(«)«i?(^)-^vr(«)}+^/(«).r («) 

2{ii)(2)-^/"(a)}2-3V/(a)/-(a) 

the  function  ^(z)  being  formed  with  the  invariants  of  the  quartic  f{x). 

(Weierstrass.) 

[This  result  was  first  published  in  1865,  in  an  Inaugural-dissertation  at  Berlin  by 
Biermann,  who  asgribed  it  to  Weierstrass.] 

Example  3.     Shew  that,  with  the  notation  of  example  2, 

gPM     {/(•^)/(«^)}^+/(a)  ,     /'(«)     .f"{a) 
"'^^'^  2{x-af  '^4:{x-a)^     24     ' 


and 


20'7.     The  uniformisation*  of  curves  of  genus  unity. 

The  theorem  of  §  20'6  may  be  stated  somewhat  differently  thus : 

If  the  variables  a;  and  y  are  connected  by  an  equation  of  the  form 

y^  =  aooc*  +  4>aiaf  -f  6a2^"  +  ^0,3^  +  «45 

then  they  can  be  expressed  as  one-valued  functions  of  a  variable  z  by  the 
equations 

^  =  ^0  +  If  (^0)  [i^  (^)  -  i-J"  (^0)}-^  \ 

y  =  if  M  ^'  (z)  W  (^)  -  iV/"  (^0)}-^  J  ' 

where  f{x)  =  aoX*  +  4aia?^  +  Gag^^  +  ^ago;  +  a^,  Xq  is  any  zero  of  f{x),  and  the 
function  <^  {z)  is  formed  with  the  invariants  of  the  quartic  ;  and  z  is  such  that 

^=r  [f{t)]-ut. 

■1  a;o 

It  is  obvious  that  y  is  a  two- valued  function  of  x  and  a;  is  a  four-valued 
function  of  y;  and  the  fact,  that  x  and  y  can  be  expressed  as  one-valued 

*  This  term  employs  the  word  uniform  iu  the  sense  one-valued.  To  prevent  confusion  with 
the  idea  of  uniformity  as  explained  in  Chapter  in,  throughout  the  present  work  we  Lave  used  the 
phrase  '  one-valued  function '  as  being  preferable  to  '  uniform  function.' 


448  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS     '  [CHAP.  XX 

functions  of  the  variable  z,  makes  this  variable  z  of  considerable  importance 
in  the  theory  of  algebraic  equations  of  the  type  considered ;  z  is  called  the 
uniformising  variable  of  the  equation 

y^  =  aocc*  +  4!aiX^  +  Ga^x^  +  4iasa;  +  a^. 

The  reader  who  is  acquainted  with  the  theory  of  algebraic  plane  curves  will  be  aware 
that  they  are  classified  according  to  their  deficiency  or  genus*,  a  luimber  whose  geometrical 
interpretation  is  that  it  is  the  difference  between  the  number  of  double  points  possessed 
by  the  curve  and  the  maximum  number  of  double  points  which  can  be  possessed  by  a 
curve  of  the  same  degree  as  the  given  curve. 

Curves  whose  deficiency  is  zero  are  called  unicursal  curves.  1i  f{a\  y)  =  0  is  the  equation 
of  a  unicursal  curve,  it  is  well  known  t  that  x  and  y  can  be  expressed  as  rational  functions 
of  a  parameter.  Since  rational  functions  are  one- valued,  this  parameter  is  a  uniformising 
variable  for  the  curve  in  question. 

Next  consider  curves  of  genus  unity;  let  f{x,y)  —  0  be  such  a  curve;  then  it  has 
been  shewn  by  Clebsch  |  that  x  and  y  can  be  expressed  as  rational  functions  of  ^  and  rj 
where  t;^  is  a  polynomial  in  |  of  degree  three  or  four.  Then,  by  §  20"6,  ^  and  rj  can  be 
expressed  as  rational  functions  of  if)  (z)  and  ^'  (z)  (these  functions  being  formed  with 
suitable  invariants),  and  so  x  and  ?/  can  be  expressed  as  one-valued  (elliptic)  functions  of  2, 
which  is  therefore  a  uniformising  variable  for  the  equation  under  consideration. 

When  the  genus  of  the  algebraic  curve  f{x,9/)  =  0  is  greater  than  unity,  the  uniformi- 
sation  can  be  effected  by  means  of  what  are  known  as  autoinorphic  functions.  Two  classes 
of  such  functions  of  genus  greatei-  than  unity  have  been  constructed,  the  first  by  Weber 
[GiHtinger  Nach.,  1886),  the  other  by  Whittaker  {Phil.  Trans,  cxcii.  pp.  1-32,  1898). 
The  analogue  of  the  period-parallelogram  is  known  as  the  'fundamental  polygon.'  In  the 
case  of  Weber's  functions  this  polygon  is  'multiply-connected,'  i.e.  it  consists  of  a  region 
containing  islands  which  have  to  be  regarded  as  not  belonging  to  it ;  whereqiS  in  the  case 
of  the  second  class  of  functions,  the  polygon  is  '  simplj'-connected,'  i.e.  it  contains  no 
such  islands.  The  latter  class  of  functions  may  therefore  be  regarded  as  a  more 
immediate  generalisation  of  elliptic  functions.  Cf.  Ford,  Introduction  to  theory  of  Auto- 
morphic  Functions  (Edinburgh  Math.  Tracts,  No.  6). 


REFEEENCES. 

K.  Weierstrass,  Werke,  Bd.  i.  pp.  1-49,  Bd.  11.  pp.  245-255,  257-309. 

C.  Briot  et  J.  C.  Bouquet,  Theorie  des  fonctions  clUpticjues. 

H.  A.  ScHWARZ,  Formeln  und  Lehrsatze  zum  Gehrauche  der  elliptischen  Funktionen, 
Nach  Vorhsimgen  und  Aufzeichmingen  des  Herrn  Prof.  K.   Weierstrass. 

A.  L.  Daniels,  'Notes  on  Weierstrass'  methods,'  American  Journal,  vi.  pp.  177-182, 
253-269  :  vii.  pp.  82-99. 

J.  LiouviLLE  (Lectures  pulilished  by  C.  W.  Borchardt),  Crelle,  Lxxx.  pp.  277-311. 

A.  Enneper,  Elliptische  Funktionen.     (Zweite  Aiiflage,  von  F.  Muller,  Halle  1890.) 

J.  Tannery  et  J.  Molk,  Fonctions  EUiptiques. 

*  French  genre,  German  Gcuchlecht. 
t  See  Salmon,  Higher  Plane  Curves,  Chapter  11. 

+  Crelle,  lxiv.  pp.  210-270.     A  proof  of  the  result  of  Clebsch  is  given  by  Forsyth,  Theory  of 
Functions,  pp.  536-538.     See  also  Cayley,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  iv.  pp.  347-352. 


ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS 


449 


1,    Shew  that 


2.     Prove  that 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 


^{'^+y)-p{z-y)=-f{z)^{y)W{z)-ipi^)}-\ 


where,  on  the  right-hand  side,  the  subject  of  differentiation  is  symmetrical  in  «,  y,  and  w. 

(Math.  Trip.  1897.) 


3.     Shew  that 

r'{z-y)   r'ky-y^)  r"(«'-^)    =\9'i 

r(^-y)    rky-y^)  r(«'-^) 

^(2-y)       ^(^-w)  <e{w-z) 


f"{z-y)    'i"'^-y^)    f"{w-z) 

&{z-y)     ^(^-w)     f{io-z) 

1  1  1 

(Trinity,  1898.) 

shew  that  y  is  one  of  the  values  of 

f(^  "4^2 logy')  +(ei-e2)(ei-e3)|  . 

(Math.  Trip.  1897.) 
5.     Prove  that 

2{^(2)-e}{g>(y)-g>(ic;)P{^(y  +  t^;)-e}*{^(y-«.)-e}*  =  0, 

where  the  sign  of  summation  refers  to  the  three  arguments  z,  y,  w,  and  e  is  any  one  of  the 


(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 


roots  gj,  62,  63. 

6.  Shew  that 

F(^)         I  iP(2)-iP(«i)  J  ' 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

7.  Prove  that 

^  (22)  -  ^  (o^i)  =  {^'  (2)} -2  {^  (,)  -  ^  (|coi)}2  {g)  (2)  -  ^  (a)2+^o,i)}2. 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

8.  Shew  that 

g>(,  +  ,)g>(^-,)^(g^(^^)g>W  +  i^2}H.73{g>(^)  +  ^W}      . 

"^  ^    ^"^  ^         ^        •  U-^W-^(^)}^ 

(Trinity,  1908.) 

9.  If  ^{u)  have  primitive  periods  2a)i,  2a)2  and 

/(«)={^(«)-^(«2)}*, 

while  ipi  (w)  and/i  (m)  are  similarly  constructed  with  periods  2&)i/«  and  2o}a,  prove  that 

^i{u)  =  ^{u)+   '2'  {^.>(w+2ma)i/«)-^(2mV;i)}, 


and 


m=l 

n    f(u  +  2mcii/7i) 

M-)=r\ 

n    f{2m<oi/n) 


W.  M.   A. 


(Math.  Trip.  1914.) 
29 


where  c=^  (2a). 
11.     Shew  that 


450  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

10.     If  x=^{u  +  a),     7/  =  p{u-a\ 

where  a  is  constant,  shew  that  the  curve  on  which  (x,  y)  lies  is 

{xy  +  ex  +  cy  +  ig^f  =  4:{x+y^c)  {cxy  -  ^g^), 

(Burnside,  Messenger,  xxi.) 

2r^  {u)  -  Zg,r'  («)  +9i  =  27  (P  {u)  +g,]\ 

(Trinity,  1909.) 

12.  If  z=\       {x^  +  Qcx'^  +  e^y^dx, 

-  &'  (z) 
verify  that  ^^I^Tc' 

the  eUiptic  function  being  formed  with  the  roots  -c,  ^{c+e),  ^{c-e). 

(Trinity,  1905.) 

13.  If  m  be  any  constant,  prove  that 

r^)j"  ^•>(^)-^(y)        "    +^^'^j    '  iO{z)-iJ{yf 

where  the  summation  refers  to  the  values  of  ^  (z)  for  which  ^'  (z)  is  zero ;  and  the  integrals 
are  indefinite. 

(Math.  Trip.  1897.) 

14.  Let  R  {x)  =  J.^  +  Bx"^  +  Cx'''  +  Dx  +  E, 

and  let  ^  =  0  {x)  be  the  function  defined  by  the  equation 

where  the  lower  limit  of  the  integral  is  arbitrary.     Shew  that 

2(f)'  (a)  _  (f)'(a+y)  +  cf)'  (a)      4^'  {ci-y)  +  (jj'  (a)  _^(p'  (a+y)-  cp'  (x) 

0(-«+y)-^(«)~' 0(«+y)-'^(«)     0(«-y)-9!>(«i     0(«+y)-0(^) 

_  0'(«-j/)^0'  i^) 
«^(«-y)-0(^') ' 

(Hermite,  Proe.  Math.  Congress,  Chicago,  1896,  p.  105.) 

15.  Shew  that,  when  the  change  of  variables 

is  applied  to  the  equations 

they  transform  into  the  similar  equations 

ri'^  +  V  (1  +pr)  +  P=0,     du^   -,^f-^   =0. 

Shew  that  the  result  of  performing  this  change  of  variables  three  times  in  succession 
is  a  return  to  the  original  variables  ^,  rj  ;  and  hence  prove  that,  if  |  and  ;;  be  denoted  as 
functions  of  w  by  JS  (u)  and  F  (w)  respectively,  then 

where  A  is  one- third  of  a  period  of  the  functions  E  (ti)  and  F{;u). 

Shew  that  E{u)  =  ^^-iO  (u  ■  g.„  g,), 

where  g.,  =  9pj,  L^^i^     ^3=  _1  _  1  p3_^l^  ^,o. 

(De  Brun,  Ofversigt  af  K.  Vet.  Akad.,  Stockholm,  Liv.) 


ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS 


451 


16.     Shew  that 


and 
where 


2a-  (z  +  ft)i)  (r(z  +  co^)  a-  (z  —  coi  —  a^) 
<T^  (2)  cr{u>i)<r  (0)2)  a-  (o)i  +  wa)      ' 

60-  (z  +  a)  a-  (z-a)  a  {z+g)(t{z-c) 


(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 


0-*  (2)  0-2  (a)  0-2  (c) 

(Math.  Trip.  1913.) 

17.  Prove  that 

^{z-a)^{z-h)  =  ip{a-h){i^{z-a)  +  (p{z-h)-^{a)-^{b)} 
+  &'ia-b){C{z-a)-C{z-b)  +  Cia)-Cib)} 
+  &icc)&{b). 

18.  Shew  that 

(Math.  Trip.  1910.) 

19.  Shew  that 

2  {^  (u^)  -  ^  (M2)}  W  (%)  -  &  (%)}  {^  (%)  -  ^  («i)} 

r  («i)  {g>  w  -  ^^  («3)} + r  («2)  {&^  (%)  -  &>  (%)} + r  (%)  {&>  («i)  -  &^  K)} 

(Math.  Trip.  1912.) 

20.  Shew  that 

1     ^{x)     iJ'ix) 

1    g-^(y)    r(y) 


(T{x+y+z)  (r{x-y)ar{y-z)<T{z—x)  _  1 
(r3  (.r)  a-^J^Hz)  ~  2 


1      ^{z)     ^'{z) 
Obtain  the  addition-theorem  for  the  function  ^  {z)  from  this  result. 

21.     Shew  by  induction,  or  otherwise,  that 


=  (-)i'*('^-i>l!2!...'rt! 


o-  (^0 +2i  + .  • .  +  2«)  no-  (2^  -  Z^) 

O-''^l(20)...O-"  +  l(2„) 


1     ^•^(-"o)     F(^o)...^(»-i)(2o) 

1  ^(^i)  r(^i)-r''-^>(^i) 

where  the  product  is  taken  for  pairs  of  all  integral  values  of  X  and  fx  from  0  to  n,  such 
that  X  <  /x. 

(Frobenius  u.  Stickelberger*  Crelle,  Lxxxiii.  p.  179.) 
22.     Express 

1     ^(.^)     ^\^)     ^'{x) 

1    ^(i/)   P(y)   F(.y) 
1    ^(2)    ^2(,)    ^j'(,) 

1     iJ{u)     ^^u)     <p'{n) 
as  a  fraction  whose  numerator  and  denominator  are  products  of  Sigma-functions. 


*  See  also  Hermite,  Crelle,  lxxxii.  p.  346. 


29—2 


452  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

Deduce  that  if  a  =  ^(^),  i3  =  ^(?/),  7  =  ^.>(4  8  =  ^{u),  where  ^+y  +  z+«  =  0,  then 
{€2  -  es)  {{a  -e,)i^-e,){y-e,){8-  e,)}*  ' 
+  (eg  -  ei)  {(a  -  62)  O  -  62)  (y  -  ^2)  (S  -  eg)}* 
+  (ei  -  ^2)  {(a  -  63)  {8  -  eg)  (y  -  eg)  (S  -  eg)}^  =  (eg  -  eg)  (eg  -  e,)  (ei  -  e^). 

(Math.  Trip.  1911.) 

23.  Shew  that 

2f(2„)-4n«>  =  |;||, 

(Math.  Trip.  1905.) 

24.  Shew  that 


^=  -  r  (-),    ^5=3g> («)  r (-) - w' («)> 

(Math.  Trip.  1912.) 


and  prove  that  a-  {nu)l{a-  {u))^^  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  u 


25.  Prove  that 

^(,-,)-^(,-6)-C(a-6)  +  C(2a-2Z,)=."/;-':t^l"^'";'M- 
''^        ^     ''^        ^     ^^         ^     ''^  ^     o-(26-2a)or(3-a)o-(2-o) 

(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

26.  Shew  that,  if  ^^-f  ^2+zg+S4=0,  then 

{2C  (2.)}^  =  3  {2f  (.,)}  {2^  (z,)}  +  2r  (^r), 
the  summations  being  taken  for  r  =  l,  2,  3,  4.  (Math.  Trip.  1897.) 

27.  Shew  that  every  elliptic  function  of  order  n  can  be  expressed  as  the  quotient  of 
two  expressions  of  the  form 

where  6,  aj,  02,  ...  an  are  constants.  (Painleve,  Bulletin  de  la  Soc.  Math,  xxvii.) 

28.  Taking  ei>e2>eg,     ^(a))  =  e,,     g>(a)')  =  eg, 

consider  the  values  assumed  by 

C{ti)-uCi(o')l(o' 

as  u  passes  along  the  perimeter  of  the  rectangle  whose  corners  are  —a>,  a,  co  +  a,  —  w  +  o)'. 

(Math.  Trip.  1914.) 

29.  Obtain  an  integral  of  the  equation 

If-=6^(.)  +  36 
w  dz^       ° 

in  the  form 

d 


dz 


.cr(.-).(e)""l^U-2^(e)     '^^'^/J' 


where  c  is  defined  by  the  equation 

Also,  obtain  another  integral  in  the  form 

o-(2;-fa,)cr(3  +  a2)  <       >  /     \       >  /     ni 
-^r^ exp  { -  zC  (ai)  -  zC  (ag)}, 

where  S-^  («i)  +  &>  («2)  =  &,     F  («i)  + ^  («2)=0, 

and  neither  ai  +  a2  "oi"  «i-a2  i«  congruent  to  a  period.  (Math.  Trip.  1912.) 


ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS 


453 


30,     Prove  that 


S'W^ 


(T{z+Zi)<r(z-\-Z2)  <T  (z+Z:i)ar(z  +  Zi) 


V{2«  +  ^(«l  +  22  +  23  +  24)} 

is  a  doubly -periodic  function  of  z,  such  that 

ff  {z)-\-g  {z+<,ii)+g  (z  + (02)+ ff  (z +  (01  +  0)2) 

=  -  2(T{^{Z2+Z3-Zi-Zi)}cr{^  (23+21  -22- •^4)}  o-  {i  (^1+^2 -23-24)}. 

(Math.  Trip.  1893.) 

31.  It  f{z)  be  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  the  third  order,  with  poles  at  2=Cx,  z=C2, 
2=63,  and  if  cf)  (2)  be  a  doubly -periodic  function  of  the  second  order  with  the  same  periods 
and  poles  at  0=a,  2=/3,  its  value  in  the  neighbourhood  of  2  =  a  being 

<^(2)=^-fXi(2-a)+X2(2-a)2+..., 
prove-that 

^X2  {/"  (a)  -/"  m  -  X  {/'  (a)  +  f  m  2  <^  (c,)  +  {/(a)  -/O)}  {sXX^  +  2  (^  (c^)  0  (03)}  =  0. 

(Math.  Trip.  1894.) 

32.  If  X  (2)  be  an  elliptic  function  with  two  poles  aj,  a2,  and  if  Zi,  22,  ...22^  be  2n 
constants  subject  only  to  the  condition 

Zl  +  Z2,+  ...+Z2n  =  n{ai+a2), 

shew  that  the  determinant  whose  nth  row  is 

1,     \{Zi),     X^Zi),    ...   X»(2i),     Xi(20,     X(2i)Xl(2i),     X2(2i)Xi(2i),    . . .   X» " 2  (2^)  Xi  (2f ) 

[where  Xj  (2j)   denotes  the  result  of  writing  Zi  for  0  in  the  derivate  of  X  (z)],  vanishes 
identically.  (Math.  Trip.  1893.) 

33.  Deduce  from  example  21  by  a  limiting  process,  or  otherwise  prove,  that 

^(2)  ^'(z)    ...'g?("-i)(2)     =(-)»-i{l!  2!  ...  (?i-l)!Po-(?m)/{o- (%)}»' 

f'{z)  f"(2)   ...^(")(2) 

g>("-l)(2)       ^(")(2)   ...  p»-3)(2) 

(Kiepert,  Crelle,  Lxxvi.) 

34.  Shew  that,  provided  certain  conditions  of  inequality  are  satisfied, 

^i^+y)    .     <o.      ^J^(eot^-hCOt 


2ci)i  \        2(»i 


,  H 20''^""*  sin  —  (mz + ny), 

2coi/       (oi  loi 


or  (2)  o-  (?/) 

where  the  summation  applies  to  all  positive  integer  values  of  m  and  71,  and  5'  =  exp  (ttiooo/coi). 

(Math.  Trip.  1895.) 

35.     Assuming  the  formula 


a-  {z)  =  e 


prove  that 


•Jif'  ^  l-2o2»cos  — +o<» 

2o)i    2(Bi    .      7r2  if  0)1 

.  — -  Sm  V—   n rr-, , 


'  (2)=  ---  +  U—      co-'^ec^  ^ 2     -     2    ^-—  cos  — 

^^  0)1       \2o)i/  2o)i         Vwi/    il-q^'  0)1 


when  2  satisfies  the  inequalities 

\l(oJ  \lcoJ  \iCOl 


(Math.  Trip.  1896.) 


454  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XX 

36.  Shew  that  if  2ot  be  any  expression  of  the  form  2m(Oi  +  2n(02  and  if 

then  a;  is  a  root  of  the  sextic 

jfi-5giX*-^g3X^  -  5g2^^^-Sg2Sf3^-5g3^=0, 
and  obtain  all  the  roots  of  the  sextic.  (Trinity,  1898.) 

37.  Shew  that 
•^'  =  «  +  LA2V,^L.^2/,_^'     5-2=5:77:7-^'     5-3=0,     ^Hz,)  = 


where 


(Dolbnia,  Darbouaf  Bulletin  (2),  xix.) 


CHAPTER  XXI 

THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS 

21  "1.     The  definition  of  a  Theta-function. 

When  it  is  desired  to  obtain  definite  numerical  results  in  problems 
involving  Elliptic  functions,  the  calculations  are  most  simply  performed 
with  the  aid  of  certain  auxiliary  functions  known  as  Theta-f unctions.  These 
functions  are  of  considerable  intrinsic  interest,  apart  from  their  connexion 
with  Elliptic  functions,  and  we  shall  now  give  an  account  of  their  funda- 
mental properties. 

The  Theta- functions  were  first  systematically  studied  by  Jacobi*,  who 
obtained  their  properties  by  purely  algebraical  methods ;  and  his  analysis 
was  so  complete  that  practically  all  the  results  contained  in  this  chapter 
(with  the  exception  of  the  discussion  of  the  problem  of  inversion  in  §§  21*7 
et  seq.)  are  to  be  found  in  his  works.  In  accordance  with  the  general  scheme 
of  this  book,  we  shall  not  employ  the  methods  of  Jacobi,  but  the  more 
powerful  methods  based  on  the  use  of  Cauchy's  theorem.  These  methods 
were  first  employed  in  the  theory  of  Elliptic  and  allied  functions  by  Liouville 
in  his  lectures  and  have  since  been  given  in  several  treatises  on  Elliptic 
functions,  the  earliest  of  these  works  being  that  by  Briot  and  Bouquet. 

[Note.     The  first  function  of  the  Theta-function  type  to  appear  in  Analysis  was  the 

00 

Partition  function f   H   (l—x'^z)~''-  of  Euler,  Introductio   in  Analysin  Infinitorum,  1748, 

I.  §  304  ;  by  means  of  the  results  given  in  §  21*3,  it  is  easy  to  express  Theta-functions  in 
terms  of  Partition  functions.     Euler  also  obtained  properties  of  products  of  the  type 

n  (i±^'0)     n  (i±^2»i)^      n  (i±^2n-i-)_ 

n=l  n=l  ii=\ 

The  associated  series  2  m^^^^^^'i   2  7?i'"*"^  '  and  2  »i"    had  previously  occurred  in  the 

n.=0  «=0  n=0 

posthumous  work  of  Jakob  Bernoulli  {A^-s  Conjectandi,  1713,  p.  55). 

*  Fnndamenta  Nova  Theoriae  Functionum  Ellipticarum,  and  Ges.  Werke,  i.  pp.  497-538. 

t  The  Partition  function  and  associated  functions  have  been  studied  by  Gauss  (Werke,  ii. 
pp.  16-21  and  iii.  pp.  433-480)  and  Cauchy  (Comptes  Renchts,  x.  p.  179).  For  a  discussion  of 
properties  of  various  functions  involving  what  are  known  as  Basic  numbers  (which  are  closely 
connected  with  Partition  functions)  see  Jackson,  Proc.  }{oyal  Sac.  lxxiv. ,  Proc.  London  Math. 
Soc.  (1)  xxviii.  and  (2)  i.,  ii.  ;  and  Watson,  Camb.  Phil.  Trans,  xxi.  A  fundamental  formula  in 
the  theory  of  Basic  numbers  was  given  by  Heine,  KugelJ'unktionen,  i.  p.  107. 


456  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

Theta-functions  also  occur  in  Fourier's  La  Theorie  Analytiqtte  de  la  Chaleur,  cf.  p.  265 
of  Freeman's  translation. 

The  theory  of  Theta-functions  was  developed  from  the  theory  of  elliptic  functions 
by  Jacobi  in  his  Fundamenta  Nova  Theoriae  Functionum  Ellipticarum  (1829),  reprinted 
in  his  Oes.  Werke,  i.  pp.  49-239  ;  the  notation  there  employed  is  explained  in  §  21-62. 
In  his  subsequent  lectures,  he  introduced  the  functions  discussed  in  this  chapter ;  an 
account  of  these  lectures  (1838)  is  given  by  Borchardt  in  Jacobi's  Ges.  Werke,  i.  pp.  497-538. 
The  most  important  results  contained  in  them  seem  to  have  been  discovered  in  1835, 
cf.  Kronecker,  Sitzungsherichte  der  K.  Preussischen  Ahad.  zu  Berlin  (1891),  pp.  653-659.] 

Let  T  be  a  (constant)  complex  number  whose  imaginary  part  is  positive ; 

and  M^rite  q  =  e^'^,  so  that  \q\  <  1. 

Consider  the  function  ^(^,  g),  defined  by  the  series 

qua  function  of  the  variable  z. 

If  A  be  any  positive  constant,  then,  when  |  2;  |  <  J.,  we  have 

n  being  a  positive  integer. 

Now  d'Alembert's  ratio  (§  2-36)  for  the  series    t    |  g-  j"^  e'^*'^  is  |  q\^''+^  e^^, 

n=-Qo 

which  tends  to  zero  as  ?i  -*  00 .  The  series  for  ^  {z,  q)  is  therefore  a  series 
of  analytic  functions,  uniformly  convergent  (§  3"34)  in  any  bounded  domain 
of  values  of  z,  and  so  it  is  an  integral  function  (§§  5"3,  5*64). 

It  is  evident  that 

^  (z,  q)  =  I  +  2  S  (  -)"  g»'  cos  2nz, 
and  that  ^  (z  +  tt,  g)  =  ^  (z,  q) ; 

further  ^  (^  +  ttt,  g)  =    ^    ( -  )»*  g"'  r/^™  e^nfe 

w=  -  X 

and  so  '^  (^  +  ttt,  q)  -  -  q-'  er^^  ^  {z,  q). 

In  consequence  of  these  results,  '^  (z,  q)  is  called  a  quasi  doubly -periodic 
function  of  z.  The  effect  of  increasing  2^  by  tt  or  ttt  is  the  same  as  the  effect 
of  multiplying  ^  {z,  q)  by  1  or  -  q-^  e-^*^,  and  accordingly  1  and  -  q-'^  e'^^^  are 
called  the  multipliers  or  periodicity  factors  associated  with  the  periods  tt  and 
TTT  respectively. 

2111.     The  four  types  of  Th  eta  functions. 

It  is  customary  to  write  '^4  (z,  q)  in  place  of  ^  {z,  q) ;  the  other  three 
types  of  Theta-functions  are  then  defined  as  follows : 


21  11]  THE  THETA    FUNCTIONS  457 

The  function  ^s  (z,  q)  is  defined  by  the  equation 

^3  (z,  q)  =  %(z  +  lTr,q)  =  i  +  2  i  ^"'^  cos  2nz. 
Next,  ^1  (z,  q)  is  defined  in  terms  of  ^4  (z,  q)  by  the  equation 

M=  —  00 

and  hence*  ^1  (^,q)  =  ^  2  (-f  q(''  +  ^)^  sin  (2w  +  1)  z. 

Lastly,  ^2  {^,  q)  is  defined  by  the  equation 

^,  (z,  q)  =  %(z  +  l7r,q]  =  2%  ^(«  +  ^)'  cos  {2n  +  1)  z. 

Writing  down  the  series  at  length,  we  have 

^1  (-s^j  q)  =  2qi  sin  z  —  2g^  sin  3^  +  2^-  t"  sin  5^;  —  . . . , 
^2 (■2',  g")  =  2q^  cos  ^  +  2^-^ cos  Sz  +  2q^' cos  oz  +  ..., 
^3  (2:,  ^)  =  1  4-  2^-  cos  2z  +  2q*  cos  4^^  +  2q^  cos  62^  +  . . . , 

^4  (-2^,  q)  =  \  —  2q  cos  22^  +  2(/'*  cos  4^  —  25^^  cos  6^  + 

It  is  obvious  that  ^1  {z,  q)  is  an  odd  function  of  z  and  that  the  other 
Theta-functions  are  even  functions  of  z. 

The  notation  which  has  now  been  introduced  is  a  modified  form  of 
that  employed  in  the  treatise  of  Tannery  and  Molk ;  the  only  difference 
between  it  and  Jacobi's  notation  is  that  ^4  {z,  q)  is  written  where  Jacobi 
would  have  written  '^  {z,  q).  There  are,  unfortunately,  several  notations  in 
use;  a  scheme,  giving  the  connexions  between  them,  will  be  found  in  §  21"9. 
For  brevity,  the  parameter  q  will  usually  not  be  specified,  so  that  ^1  {z), . . . 

will  be  written  for  ^1  (z,  q), When  it  is  desired  to  exhibit  the  dependence 

of  a  Theta-function  on  the  parameter  r,  it  will  be  written  ^  {z  \  r).  Also 
^2(0),  ^3(0),  ^4(0)  will  be  replaced  by  ^2,  ^3 >  ^4  respectively;  and  ^1'  will 
denote  the  result  of  making  z  equal  to  zero  in  the  derivate  of  ^i  {z). 

•  Example  1.     Shew  that 

S,{z,q)  =  h{-2z,q*)-9,{2z,q*). 

*  Example  2.     Obtain  the  results 

5i(2)=        -S^{z  +  ^7r)  =-0/53(2  +  U+W)=-0/»4(2  +  ^7rr), 

'h{z)=  Bi{2  +  h^)    =         M$^(z  +  ^7r  +  UT)=  M3.i{z  +  ^1TT\ 

Si{z)=-aiSi{z  +  ^7rr)=     ^■J/92(^  +  |7r  +  W)=  Ssiz  +  i^n), 

where  M=q'e^'. 

*  Throughout   the   chapter,  the   many-vahied   function   q^   is   to   be   interpreted   to    mean 
exp  (Xttit). 


458 


THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XXI 


'     Example  3.      Shew  that  the  multipliers  of  the  Theta-functions  associated  with  the 
periods  tt,  itt  are  given  by  the  scheme 


^l(^)              ^2(«) 

^3(2) 

^4{^) 

TT 

-1         ,         -1 

1 

1 

7TT 

-N     '       N 

iT 

-N 

where  iV=2'"^e"2*^ 

*  Example  4.     If  5  (z)  be  any  one  of  the  four  Theta-functious  and  ^'  (2)  its  derivate  with 
respect  to  z,  shew  that 

5  (2  +  7r)      S(2)'         5  (2  +  7rr)  •»  («) ' 

2112.     T/?e  ^•ero*  q/"  the  Theta-f unctions. 

From  the  quasi-periodic  properties  of  the  Theta-functions  it  is  obvious 
that  if  ^  {z)  be  any  one  of  them,  and  if  z^  be  any  zero  of  ^  {z),  then 

Zq  +  imr  +  nirr 

is  also  a  zero  of  ^  {z),  for  all  integral  values  of  m  and  n. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  if  C  be  a  cell  with  comers  <,  i  +  tt,  i  +  tt  -I-  ttt, 
t  +  ITT,  then  ^  {z)  has  one  and  only  one  zero  inside  C. 

Since  '^  {z)  is  analytic  throughout  the  finite  part  of  the  2^-plane,  it  follows, 
from  §  6"31,  that  the  number  of  its  zeros  inside  C  is 


^'^dz. 


Treating  the  contour  after  the  manner  of  §  20'12,  we  see  that 

1  ^  ^'Wd. 


l-irijc'^iz) 


J_  r'+'^  (^^(£)  _  ^^(^_+7rT)|   .    _  J_  {'"^-^  {"^'J^  _  ^^(^  +  7r)] 
27rtJ,      h(^)      ^(^-Httt)]  27rij,        l^(^)      ^(^-f7r)| 


t  +  TT 


„    .  ,        2i(^^', 
by  §  21 '11  example  4.     Therefore 


27ri ./  c  ^  (^) 


rf^  =  l, 


that  is  to  say,  ^{z)  has  one  simple  zero  only  inside  (7;  this  is  the  theorem 
stated. 


21  12,  2 12]  THE  THETA   FUNCTIONS  459 

Since  one  zero  of  %(z)  is  obviously  z  =  0,  it  follows  that  the  zeros  of 
^i(^),  ^2(-s^),  ^3('2^)>  ^4(^)  are  the  points  congruent  respectively  to  0,  2"^, 
^TT  +  2  TTT,  2''"r-  The  reader  will  observe  that  these  four  points  form  the 
comers  of  a  parallelogram  described  counter-clockwise, 

21  "2.     The  relations  between  the  squares  of  the  Theta-functions. 

It  is  evident  that,  if  the  Theta-functions  be  regarded  as  functions  of  a 
single  variable  z,  this  variable  can  be  eliminated  from  the  equations  defining 
any  pair  of  Theta-functions,  the  result  being  a  relation  *  between  the  functions 
which  might  be  expected,  on  general  grounds,  to  be  non-algebraic;  there 
are,  however,  extremely  simple  relations  connecting  any  three  of  the  Theta- 
functions  ;  these  relations  will  now  be  obtained. 

Each  of  the  four  functions  ^j^  (z),  V  (2),  V  (■2),  V  (z)  is  analytic  for  all 
values  of  z  and  has  periodicity  factors  1,  q~'^e~*^''  associated  with  the  periods 
TT,  TTT ;  and  each  has  a  double  zero  (and  no  other  zeros)  in  any  cell. 

From  these  considerations  it  is  obvious  that,  if  a,  b,  a'  and  b'  are  suitably 
chosen  constants,  each  of  the  functions 

ftV(^)-h6V(^)-    a"^,Hz)  +  b'X^{z) 
V(^)  '  V(^) 

is  a  doubly -periodic  function  (with  periods  tt,  ttt)  having  at  most  only  a 
simple  pole  in  each  cell.  By  §  20"13,  such  a  function  is  merely  a  constant; 
and  obviously  we  can  adjust  a,  b,  a',  b'  so  as  to  make  the  constants,  in  each 
of  the  cases  under  consideration,  equal  to  unity. 

There  exist,  therefore,  relations  of  the  form 

%"  (z)  =  a%'  (z)  +  6  V  (z),     %'  (z)  =  a'%'  (z)  +  6' V  (z). 

To  determine  a,  b,  a',  b',  give  z  the  special  values  2  ttt  and  0 ;  since 

we  have  V  =  -  « V,  V  =  i^/ ;     %'  =  -  «' V,  %""  =  6' V- 

Consequently,  we  have  obtained  the  relations 

%'  (Z)  V  =  ^4^  (z)  %'  -  ^1'^  (z)  %',     %'  (z)  V  =  V  (z)  V  -  V  (z)  V. 

If  we  write  ^  +  g  tt  for  2',  we  get  the  additional  relations 

%^  (z)  V  -  V  (^)  V  -  ^2^  (^)  %',     V  (z)  V  =  %'  (z)  V  -  %'  (z)  V. 

By  means  of  these  results  it  is  possible  to  express  any  Theta-function  in 
terms  of  any  other  pair  of  Theta-functions. 

*  The  analogous  relation  for  the  functions  sin  2  and  cos  z  is,  of  course,  (sin2)2  + (cosz)2=l. 


460  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

Corollary.     Writing  2  =  0  in  the  last  relation,  we  have 
that  is  to  say 

21*21.     The  addition-formulae  for  the  Theta functions. 

The  results  just  obtained  are  particular  cases  of  formulae  containing  two 
variables ;  these  formulae  are  not  addition-theorems  in  the  strict  sense,  as 
they  do  not  express  Theta-functions  oi  z  -^-y  algebraically  in  terms  of  Theta- 
functions  of  z  and  y,  but  all  involve  Theta-functions  of  ^  —  3/  as  well  as  of 
z  +  y,  z  and  y. 

To  obtain  one  of  these  formulae,  consider  ^3  (z  +  y)  ^3  (z  —  y)  qua  function 
of  z.  The  periodicity  factors  of  this  function  associated  with  the  periods  tt 
and  TTT  are  1  and  q-^  e'^^  '^+2^'  .  q-^  e'^^  <^-?/>  =  q-^  e-*'\ 

But  the  function  a^3^  (z)  +  b%^  (z)  has  the  same  periodicity  factors,  and 
we  can  obviously  choose  the  ratio  a:b  so  that  the  doubly -periodic  function 

a%Hz)  +  b%'(z) 
%{z  +  y)'^,{z~y) 

has  no  poles  at  the  zeros  of  %  (z  —  y);  it  then  has,  at  most,  a  single  simple 
pole  in  any  cell,  namely  the  zero  of  ^3  (z  +  y)  in  that  cell,  and  consequently 
(§  20*13)  it  is  a  constant,  i.e.  independent  of  z ;  and,  as  only  the  ratio  a  :  6  is 
so  far  fixed,  we  may  choose  a  and  h  so  that  the  constant  is  unity. 

We  then  have  to  determine  a  and  b  from  the  identity  in  z, 

a  V  {z)  +  h%-^  {z)  =  %{z^  y)  %  (z  -  y). 
To  do  this,  put  z  in  turn  equal  to  0  and  2 '""  +  2  '""''"'  ^^*^  ^®  8'®^ 

a  V  =  V  {y),        b%^  [I'TT  +  l  TTT  j  =  ^3  (1  TT  +  ^  TTT  -t-  y)  ^3  (^TT  +  ^  TTT  -  2/)  ; 

and  so  a  =  V  (y)/%\     b  =  %'  (y)/%\ 

We  have  therefore  obtained  an  addition-formula,  namely 

^3  (^  +  y)  %  (z  -  y)  %^  =  V  (2/)  %'  (^)  +  V  (y)  %'  {z). 
The  set  of  formulae,  of  which  this  is  typical,  will  be  found  in  examples  1 

and  2  at  the  end  of  this  chapter. 

21*22.     Jacohi's  fundamental  formvlae*. 

The  addition -formulae  just  obtained  are  particular  cases  of  a  set  of  identities  first  given 
by  Jacobi,  who  obtained  them  by  purely  algebraical  methods ;  each  identity  involves  as 
many  as  four  independent  variables,  w,  ^,  y,  z. 

Let  w',  x\  y',  z'  be  defined  in  terms  of  w,  x,  y,  z,  by  the  set  of  equations 

2w'  :=  —w  +  x-\-y  +  2, 
1x' =  tv  —  x+y  +  z^ 
2y' =  tv  +  x-y  +  z, 
2z'  =  w-{-x+y  —  z. 
*  Ges.  Werke,  i.  p.  505. 


21-21,  21-22] 


THE   THETA    FUNCTIONS 


461 


The  reader  will  easily  verify  that  the  connexion  between  w,  x,  y,  z  and  w',  of,  y\  /  is  a 
reciprocal  one*. 

For  brevity  t,  write  [r]  for  X  (w)  ^r  {x)  3r  (y)  ^r  («)  and  [r]'  for  5^  (v/)  Sr  C-^)  ^r  i^')  ^r  («'). 

Consider  [3],  [1]',  [2]',  [3]',  [4]'  qua  functions  of  z.  The  effect  of  increasing  «  by  tt  or  wr 
is  to  transform  the  functions  in  the  first  row  of  the  following  table  into  those  in  the  second 
or  third  row  respectively. 


[3] 

[1]' 

[2]' 

[3]' 

[4]' 

(rr) 

[3] 

-[2]'   . 

-[1]' 

[4]' 

[3]' 

(tt) 

#[3]        -iV[4]'     i      iV^[3]'    ■ 

i 

JV[2]' 

-^[1]' 

For  brevity,  N  has  been  written  in  place  of  j"ie~2»«. 

Hence  both  -[l]'+[2]'  +  [3]'  +  [4]'  and  [3]  have  periodicity  factors  1  and  JV,  and  so 
their  quotient  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  with,  at  most,  a  single  simple  pole  in  any  cell, 
namely  the  zero  of  ^3  (z)  in  that  cell. 

By  §  20*13,  this  quotient  is  merely  a  constant,  i.e.  independent  oi  z;  and  considerations 
of  symmetry  shew  that  it  is  also  independent  of  iv,  x  and  y. 

We  have  thus  obtained  the  result 

J[3]=-[l]'  +  [2]'  +  [3]'  +  [4]', 

where  A  is  independent  of  w,  x,  y^,  z;  to  determine  A  put  w=x=y  =  z=0,  and  we  get 

and  so,  by  §  21  "2  corollary,  we  see  that  A  =2. 

Therefore  2  [3]= -[1]'  + [2]' +  [3]' +  [4]'  (i). 

This  is  one  of  Jacobi's  formulae  ;  to  obtain  another,  increase  w,  .r,  y,  z  (and  therefore 
also  w',  x',  y',  z)  by  ^n ;  and  we  get 

2[4]  =  [l]'-[2]'  +  [3]'  +  [4]' (ii). 

Increasing  all  the  variables  in  (i)  and  (ii)  by  ^n-r,  we  obtain  the  further  results 

2[2]  =  [l]'  +  [2]'  +  [3]'-[4]'    (iii), 

2[l]  =  [l]'  +  [2]'-[3]'+[4]'    (iv). 

[Note.  There  are  256  expressions  of  the  form  Sp{w)  Sq{x)  S^i^)  ^s{^)  which  can  be 
obtained  from  ^3  (w)  ^3  (x)  B3  (y)  S^  {z)  by  increasing  w,  x,  y,  z  by  suitable  half-periods,  but 
only  those  in  which  the  suffixes  jo,  j,  r,  s  are  either  equal  in  pairs  or  all  different  give  rise 
to  formulae  not  containing  quarter-periods  on  the  right-hand  side.] 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

[l]  +  [2]  =  [l]'  +  [2]',  [2]  +  [3]  =  [2]'  +  [3]',  [l]  +  [4]=[l]'  +  [4]',  [3] -h  [4]  =  [3]' -f  [4]', 

[l]  +  [3]  =  [2]'-H[4]',  [2]-i-[4]  =  [l]'  +  [3]'. 

*  In  Jacobi's  work  the  signs  of  ic,  x',  y',  z'  are  changed  throughout  so  that  the  complete 
symmetry  of  the  relations  is  destroyed  ;  the  symmetrical  forms  just  given  are  due  to  H.  J.  S. 
Smith,  Proc.  London  Math.  Soc.  i.  (1865). 

t  The  idea  of  this  abridged  notation  is  to  be  traced  in  H.  J.  S.  Smith's  memoir.  It  seems, 
however,  not  to  have  been  used  before  Kronecker,  Crelle,  cii.  (1887). 


462  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

Example  2.      By  writing  w-\-\ni  x  +  \ir  for  w,  x  (and  consequently  y'  +  ^rr,  z'  +  ^ir 
for  y,  z'),  shew  that 

[3344]  +  [22 1 1  ] = [4433]' + [11 22]', 

where  [3344]  means  ^3  (w)  S3  (x)  ^4  (y)  ^4  (2),  etc. 

jExample  3.     Shew  that 

2  [1234]  =  [3412]'  +  [2143]'  -  [1234]'  +  [4321]'. 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

S,^{z)  +  S3'(z)=S,''{z)  +  S,^z). 

21*3.     Jacobi's  expressions  for  the  Theta-functions  as  infinite  products*. 
We  shall  now  establish  the  result 

'^i{z)  =  G  n   (1  -  2^2n-i  cog  2z  +  ^«-2), 

(where  G  is  independent  of  z),  and  three  similar  formulae. 
Let  f{z)  =  n  (1  -  f/'^-i  e2i^)  n  (1  _  q^n-i  g-2iz^ . 

each  of  the  two  products  converges  absolutely  and  uniformly  in  any  bounded 
domain  of  values  of  z,  by  §  3"341,  on  account  of  the  absolute  convergence  of 

2  q^^~^ ;  hence  /  (z)  is  analytic  throughout  the  finite  part  of  the  ^-plane, 

w=l 

and  so  it  is  an  integral  function. 

The  zeros  of f(z)  are  simple  zeros  at  the  points  where 

g2iz  =  g(2»+l)«V  ^^^  =...,-  2,  -  1,  0,  1,  2,  ...) 

I.e.  where  2iz  =  (2n  +  1) irir  +  2ni'7ri ;  so  that  f{z)  and  ^i{z)  have  the  same 
zeros ;  consequently  the  quotient  ^4  (z)/f{z)  has  neither  zeros  nor  poles  in 
the  finite  part  of  the  plane. 

Now,  obviously /(^r  +  tt)  =f{z) ; 

and  f(z  +  TTt)  =    n    (1  -  52«+l  g2iz^    n   (1  _  ^2n-3g-2w-) 

=  /(^)  (1  -  fy-1  e-2''^)/(l  -  ge2/^-) 
=  -  q-'^  e-"'\f(z). 

That  is  to  say  f{z)  and  ^^{z)  have  the  same  2)enodicity  factors  (§  21-11 
example  3).  Therefore  %{z)/f(z)  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  with  no 
zeros  or  poles,  and  so  (§  20-12)  it  is  a  constant  G,  say;   consequently 

00 
^4(^)  =  G  U  (1-  2q'''-^  cos  2z  +  q'""-"-). 

CO 

[It  will  appear  in  §  21-42  that  G=  FI  (1  -  q^").] 

n  =  l 

Write  2;  +  ^  TT  for  ^  in  this  result,  and  we  get 

^3  (2)  =  (r  n  (1  +  2ry-«-i  cos  2z  +  g^'^-2). 

H  =  l 

*  Of.  Fnndanienta  Nova,  p.  145. 


21-3-21'41]  THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS  463 

Also  ^1  {z)  =  -  iq^  e^  X  (z  +  \  TTT^ 

=  -  iq^  e^' G  Tl  {I  -  f""  e^'^)  fi  (1  -  ^2»-2  g-2tz) 

M=l  »=1 

=  2^5*  sin  z  n  (1  -  92n  e^^^^)  fi  (1  -  g2«  ^-2^)^ 

w=l  n-\ 

and  so  ^i  (^)  =  2Gq^  sin  ^r  11  (1  -  252n  cos  2z  +  ^") 

while  ^2  {z)  =  ^Az-\-\'rr\ 

=  2Gq^  cos  ^  n  (1  +  2^2"  cos  2z  +  3*"). 

M  =  l 

Example.    Shew  that* 

00  18  r    «  1  8         c    oc  18 

n  {\-qin-i)i  +\^\  n  (i+?2™)l  =]  n  (i+?2»-i)i 


(Jacobi.) 

21*4.     TAe  differential  equation  satisfied  by  the  Theta-functions. 

We  may  regard  ^3(5|t)  as  a  function  of  two  independent  variables  z 
.1*-        and  t;    and  it  is  permissible  to  differentiate  the  series  for  ^^{z\r)  any 
\  ?"     number  of  times  with  regard  to  z  or  t,  on  account  of  the  uniformity  of 
•       convergence  of  the  resulting  series  (§  4" 7  corollary) ;  in  particular 

y  ^ '    ^  =  —  4     S    n'^  exp  (n^iriT  +  2niz) 

OZ"  «  =  _  00 


^1 


4  d%,{z\r) 


iri        dr 
f  >         Consequently,  the  function  ^3  (s  j  r)  satisfies  the  partial  differential  equation 


\i 


1    V^'2/^^^-0 

The  reader  will  readily  prove  that  the  other  three  Theta-functions  also 
satisfy  this  equation. 

21'41.     A  relation  between  Theta-functions  of  zero  argument. 
The  remarkable  result  that 

V(0)  =  ^,(0)^3(0)^4(0) 

will  now  be  established  +      It  is  first  necessary  to  obtain  some  formulae  for 
differential  coefficients  of  all  the  Theta-functions. 

*  Jacobi  describes  this  result  {Fund.  Nova,  p.  90)  as  'aequatio  identica  satis  abstrusa.' 

t    Several  proofs  of   this  important   proposition   have   been   given,  but   none   are    simple. 

Jacobi's  original  proof  {Ges.  Werke,  i.   pp.  51.5-517),  though  somewhat  more  difficult  than  the 

proof  given  here,  is  well  worth  study. 


464 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XXI 


Since  the  resulting  series  converge  uniformly,  except  near  the  zeros  of 
the  respective  Theta- functions,  we  may  differentiate  the  formulae  for  the 
logarithms  of  Theta-functions,  obtainable  from  §  21 '3,  as  many  times  as  we 
please. 

Denoting  differentiations  with  regard  to  z  by  primes,  we  thus  get 


V(^)  =  ^3(^)  2     ,3 


liq^ 


n^\  1  +  g' 


2n-l  c2iz 


"     2ig2»-i  e-2'> 


"i  1  +  i 


2n— 1  a— 2iz 


"Liq 


Iriln—X  o^iz 


-  t 


2iq 


2n— 1  ^— 2tz 


+  i 


_«=!  (1  +  2'^-'  e^^'f     n=i  (1  +  9'"-'  e-''^'y_ 


Making  ^  -*  0,  we  get 

V(0)  =  0,    V(0)  =  - 8^3(0)  S^^^^^^,,_,^, 
In  like  manner, 

V(0)  =  0,     V(0)  =  8^,(0)  2   Tj^-^,,^^.' 


,=1  (1-9^-7^ 


V(0)  =  o,   V(0)  =  ^.(0) 


-1-8  2 


n=i{i^rjy 


and,  if  we  write  ^i  (z)  =  sin  z .  (^  (z),  we  get 


GO  ^,2 

<^'(o)  =  o,    f'(0)  =  8(^(0)  S  -r-^- 


we  get 


^=1  (1  -  q^^y 

If,  however,  we  diflferentiate  the  equation  ^1(2^)  =  sin^^.  (}){z)  three  times, 

Therefore  :^i^v"/ _  01  ^         '-/ 

and 


V(0)    -^  .rx(i-g-)-^ 


-1  ; 


V(0)    V(0)    V(0) 
"^  ^,(0)  "^  ^3(0)  "^  ^4(0) 


L     n  =  i  (1  +  g-^*^)^      «=i  (1  +  q'^'-J  ^  nti  (1  -  q^'-')\ 


=  8 


_    V 


+   t 


-   S 


«=i  (1  +  ^'0'  «=i  (1  -  ry  n=i  (1  -  q'^'T, 


on  combining  the  first  two  series  and  writing  the  third  as  the  difference  of 
two  series.  If  we  add  corresponding  terms  of  the  first  two  series  in  the  last 
line,  we  get  at  once 

V'  (0)    ^3"  (0)    X'  (0)  _      5      g-  -^Z"  (0) 

^  ^.(0)  +  ^^3(0)  +  vo)  ~  "■*«=!  (T^r)^  -  ^  +  VTO)  • 


2142]  THE   THETA   B^UNCTIONS  465 

Utilising  the  differential  equations  of  §  21*4,  this  may  be  written 


1        d%'  (0  1  t) 


V(0|t)        dr 


1        d%{0\T)  1        <^^3(0iT)  1        d%(0\r) 


^2(01  r)        dr  ^3(0  Jt)        dr         ^4  (Ok)        dr 

Integrating  with  regard  to  r,  we  get 

V  (0,  q)  =  G%  (0,  q)  %  (0,  q)  %  (0,  q), 

where  0  is  a  constant  (independent  of  q).    To  determine  G,  make  q-*();  since 

limg~*V=2,     Iim9-H2=2,     lim^3  =  l,     lim^4  =  l, 

9-»-0  g-*0  3-*-0  g-*-0 

we  see  that  C  =  1 ;  and  so 

which  is  the  result  stated. 

21*42.     The  value  of  the  constant  0. 

From  the  result  just  obtained,  we  can  at  once  deduce  the  value  of  the 
constant  0  which  was  introduced  in  §  21*3. 

For,  by  the  formulae  of  that  section, 

X  =  </>  (0)  =  2^^  Gil  {1-  q''%     %=2qiG  U  {1  +  q'^'f, 

W  =  l  Ji  =  l 

00  •  00 

^3  =  G'  n  (1  +  q'^^-'y,   ^,  =  G  u(i-  f^-% 

n=l  n=l 

and  so,  by  §  21  •41,  we  have 

GO  QO  00  00 

n  (1  -  q-""-)^  =  G^  n  (1  +  q^^f  U  (1  +  g2/i-i)2  n  (1  -  q^-')\ 

M=l  w=l  n-\  n=\ 

Now  all   the   products   converge   absolutely,  since    |5'|<1,  and   so   the 
following  rearrangements  are  permissible : 

n  (1  -  f^-^)  n  (1  -  f'^)\ .  I  n  (1  +  if-')  n  (i  +  q^'')\ 
=  n  (1  -  q^)  n  (1  +  5") 

w=l  «=1 

00 

=  n  (1  -  g^"), 

the  first  step  following  from  the  consideration  that  all  positive  integers  are 
comprised  under  the  forms  2n  —  1  and  2?i. 

Hence  the  equation  determining  G  is 

n  {l-(f'f=G\ 

n  =  \ 

and  SO  G  =  ±  IT  (1  -  g^"). 

W.  M.  A.  30 


466  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

To  determine  the  ambiguity  in  sign,  we  observe  that  G  is  an  analytic 
function  of  q  (and  consequently  one-valued)  throughout  the  domain  \q\<\] 
and  from  the  product  for  ^3  {z),  we  see  that  (r  -*  1  as  q^Q.  Hence  the 
plus  sign  must  always  be  taken ;  and  so  we  have  established  the  result 

00 
G=   n  (1  -  q^'% 

•  Example  1.     Shew  that  Bi=2q^G^. 

« Example  2.     Shew  that 

54=  n  {(1 -?2"-^)(i -?")}• 
I  Example  3.     Shew  that 

1+2  2  q'''=  n  {{l-f-')(l+f''-^f}. 

21*43.     Connexion  of  the  Sigma-function  with  the  Theta-fitnctions. 

It  has  been  seen  (§  20'421  example  3)  that  the  function  cr{z\(x>i,  0)2),  formed  with 
the  periods  Swi,  2co2,  is  exj^ressible  in  the  form 

where  q  =  e%.^{Tvi(i)2l<>>i)- 

If  we  compare  this  result  with  the  product  of  §  2r4  for  5i  (s  |  r),  we  see  at  once  that 

TT  \2cOj/     2"-         n=\  \^Wl     <»1/ 

To  express  r^i  in  terms  of  Theta-functions,  take  logarithms  and  differentiate  twice, 
so  that 


'{^)='^-(~)   cosec^  GP-    + 


^1«  _  \<i>li^Y'] 


,0' 

where  v^^nzlcoi  and  the  function  0  is  that  defined  in  v^  2r41. 

Expanding  in  ascending  powers  of  z  and  equating  the  terms  independent  of  z  in  this 
result,  we  get 

o^ni^^  fjL\\f  ^y^l^''^^) 

"  0)1      3  \2coJ        \2o}J     (p  (0)  ' 
and  so  rji  = -7  . 

Consequently  cr  (2 1  coi ,    to.^)    can   be   expressed   in   terms   of    Theta-functions   by   the 
formula 


a(.ia.x,co,3)=^,exp(^---J5i^.|-j, 


where  i/  =  |7r2/a)i. 
'    Example.     Prove  that 


_        /tt'^cOoS/"        Trl\ 


21"5.     TAe  expression  of  elliptic  functions  hy  means  of  Theta functions. 

It  has  just  been  seen  that  Theta-functions  are  substantially  equivalent 
to  Sigma-functions,  and  so,  corresponding  to  the  formulae  of  §§  20-5-20-58, 
there  will  exist  expressions  for  elliptic  functions  in  terms  of  Theta-functions. 


21-43-2r51]  THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS  467 

From  the  theoretical  point  of  view,  the  formulae  of  §§  20-5-20-53  are  the 
more  important  on  account  of  their  symmetry  in  the  periods,  but  in  practice 
the  Theta-function  formulae  have  two  advantages,  (i)  that  Theta-functions 
are  more  readily  computed  than  Sigma-functions,  (ii)  that  the  Theta- 
functions  have  a  specially  simple  behaviour  with  respect  to  the  real  period, 
which  is  generally  the  significant  period  in  applications  of  elliptic  functions 
in  Applied  Mathematics. 

hetfiz)  be  an  elliptic  function  with  periods  2&)i,  2&).2;  let  a  fundamental 
set  of  zeros  («!,  ota,  ...  «„)  and  poles  (^i,  ^^y  •••  AO  be  chosen,  so  that 

r=l 

as  in  §  20-53. 

Then,  by  the  methods  of  §  20-53,  the  reader  will  at  once  verify  that 


TTZ  —  vra* 


coj  '      H       2a)i 


V     2&)i 
where  J.  3  is  a  constant ;  and  if 

t    Ar,m{2-I3ry 
m  =  l 

be  the  principal  part  o^  f{z)  at  its  pole  /3r,  then,  by  the  methods  of  §  20-52, 

where  A^.  is  a  constant. 

This  formula  is  important  in  connexion  with  the  integration  of  elliptic 
functions.  An  example  of  an  application  of  the  formula  to  a  dynamical 
problem  will  be  found  in  §  22-741. 

*  Example.     Shew  that  , 


and  deduce  that 

21*51.     Jacohi's  imaginary  transformation. 

If  an  elliptic  function  be  constructed  with  periods  2(Ui,  2co2,  such  that 

1  {(0.2/00^)  >  0, 

it  might  be  convenient  to  regard  the  periods  as  being  202,  —  2(Wi;  for  these 
numbers  are  periods  and,  if  /  (w./wi)  >  0,  then  also  /  (—  cojcoo)  >  0.  In  the 
case  of  the  elliptic  functions  which  have  been  considered  up  to  this  puint, 
the  periods  have  appeared  in  a  symmetrical  manner  and  nothing  is  gained 
by  this  point  of  view.  But  in  the  case  of  the  Theta-functions,  which  are 
only  quasi-periodic,  the  behaviour  of  the  function  with  respect  to  the  real 

30—2 


468  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

period  tt  is  quite  different  from  its  behaviour  with  respect  to  the  complex 
period  ttt.  Consequently,  in  view  of  the  result  of  §  21  "43,  we  may  expect  to 
obtain  transformations  of  Theta-functions  in  which  the  period-ratios  of  the 
two  Theta-functions  involved  are  respectively  t  and  —  1/t. 

These  transformations  were  first  obtained  by  Jacobi*,  who  obtained  them 
from  the  theory  of  elliptic  functions.  A  direct  proof  of  the  transformations 
is  due  to  Landsberg,  who  used  the  methods  of  contour  integration f.  The 
investigation  of  Jacobi's  formulae,  which  we  shall  now  give,  is  based  on 
Liouville's  theorem ;  the  precise  formula  which  we  shall  establish  is 

%(z\r)  =  {-ir)-Uxp(X~).%(-\--), 
\7nTj         \t\      tJ 

where  (—  ir)~^  is  to  be  interpreted  by  the  convention  |  arg  {—it)  |  <  o^'''- 
For  brevity,  we  shall  write  —  l/r  =  r',  q'  =  exp  (tti't'). 

The  only  zeros  of  ^3  (z  \  r)  and  ^3  {r'z  |  t')  are  simple  zeros  at  the  points 
at  which 

11  /  /  ,,11, 

z  =  omr  4-  wttt  +  2  t^  +  2  ''"^'     t  z  =  m  tt  +  n  ttt  +  ^tt  +  2'^'^ 

respectively,  where  m,  n,  m',  n  take  all  integer  values;  taking  m'  =  —  n  —  \, 
n'  =  m,  we  see  that  the  quotient 

is  an  integral  function  with  no  zeros. 

Also      ^\r{z  +  ttt)  -^  yjr  (z)  =  ex-p  (  — '""^   .   "^  ''"  )  -^  q-^  g-s'^  =  1 , 

while  ^{r  (z  -  tt) -^  yjr  (z)  =  exp  (^^—^ ~]  X  q'-'^  g-^iw/T  =  1. 

Consequently -v/r (2-)  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  with  no  zeros  or  poles; 
and  so  (§  20-12)  yjr  {z)  must  be  a  constant,  A  (independent  of  z). 

Thus  ^^3  (z\r)  =  exp  (iTz'/ir)  %  (zr'  \  r')  ; 

and  writing  z  +  ^'rr,  z  +  2 ttt,  z  +  ^tt  -\-  ^ttt  in  turn  for  z,  we  easily  get 
^"^4  (z\t)=         exp  (zW-'/tt)  '^a  (zT  j  t'), 
A%  (z  \t)=  exp  (ir'z-jTT)  '^4  (zr  j  t'), 

A%{z\t)=  -  i  exp  {it'z'Jtt)  \  (zt  j  t  ). 

We  still  have  to  prove  that  A  =  (-  ir)^ ;  to  do  so,  differentiate  the  last 
equation  and  then  put  ^  =  0  ;  we  get 

AX{(y\r)=  -zW(0|t'). 

*  Gen.  Werke,  i.  p.  2G4.  A  particular  case  of  Jacobi's  results  had  been  previously  given  by 
Poisson,  Journal  de  V Kcole.  polyteclmique,  cahier  xix. 

+  This  method  is  indicated  in  example  17  of  Chapter  vi,  p.  124.     See  Landsberg,  Crellc,  cxi. 


21 -52]  THE   THETA    FUNCTIONS  469 

But  V  (0  I  t)  =  ^2  (0  I  t)  ^3  (0  I  r)  ^4  (0  !  r) 

and  X  (0  I  t')  =  %{0\  t')  ^3  (0  |  r)  ^4  (0  |  r) ; 

on  dividing  these  results  and  substituting,  we  at  once  get  A~^  =  —  ir,  and  so 

To  determine  the  ambiguity  in  sign,  we  observe  that 

both  the  Theta-functions  being  analytic  functions  of  t  when  Z(t)>0; 
thus  A  is  analytic  and  one-valued  in  the  upper  half  r-plane.  Since  the 
Theta-functions  are  both  positive  when  t  is  a  pure  imaginary,  the  plus  sign 
must  then  be  taken.  Hence,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  we 
always  have 

A  =  +(-ir)^; 

this  gives  the  transformation  stated. 

•    Example  1.     Shew  that 


when  rr'=  —  1. 

•     Example  2,     Shew  that 


^4  (0  I  r)  _  So^  (0  I  t') 


53(0|r+l)  ^4(0|r)' 


•  Example  3.     Shew  that 

and  shew  that  the  plus  sign  should  be  taken. 

21*52.     Landens  type  of  transformation. 

A  transformation  of  elliptic  integrals  (§  22'7),  which  is  of  historical 
interest,  is  due  to  Landen  (§  22*42) ;  this  transformation  follows  at  once 
from  a  transformation  connecting  Theta-functions  with  parameters  r  and  2t, 
namely 

^3(^|t)^4(^|t)  ^  ^3(0|T)^4(0iT) 

^4(2^  I  2t)  ^4(0  I  2t)        ' 

which  we  shall  now  prove. 

The  zeros  of  ^3  {z  \  r)  ^4  {z  \  r)  are  simple  zeros  at  the  points  where 
z=  [m  +  ^\'rT  +  {n-\--ATrr  and  where  z  =  mir  +  (  ^  +  o )  '^'^>  where  m  and  n 

take  all  integral  values ;  these  are  the  points  where  2z  =  mir  -f-  in  +  -Att  .  2t, 
which  are  the  zeros  of  ^4  {2z  \  2t).     Hence  the  quotient 

%{z\t)'^Mt) 
^4  (2^  I  2t) 


470  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

has  no  zeros  or  poles.  Moreover,  associated  with  the  periods  ir  and  ttt,  it 
has  multipliers  1  and  {q-^  e'''')  (-  q-'  0-''')  -r  (-  q-^  e''"')  =  1 ;  it  is  therefore 
a  doubly-periodic  function,  and  is  consequently  (§  20-12)  a  constant.  The 
value  of  this  constant  may  be  obtained  by  putting  z  =  0,  and  we  then  have 
the  result  stated. 

If  we  write  z-^^tn  for  z,  we  get  a  corresponding  result  for  the  other 

Theta-functions,  namely 

%{z\t)%{z  1  t)  ^  ^3  (0  I  t)  ^4  (0  I  t) 
^i(2^j2t)  ^4(0|2t) 

21'6.     The  differential  equations  satisfied  by  quotients  of  Theta-functions. 

From  §  2ril  example  3,  it  is  obvious  that  the  function 

%(z)^Xiz) 

has  periodicity  factors  —  1,  +  1  associated  with  the  periods  tt,  ttt  respectively ; 
and  consequently  its  derivative 

{%'  (z)  %  (z)  -  V  (^)  ^1  (^)]  -  V  (^) 

has  the  same  periodicity  factors. 

But  it  is  easy  to  verify  that  %  (z)  %(z)/^^^{z)  has  periodicity  factors  —  1, 
+  1 ;  and  consequently,  if  ^  (z)  be  defined  as  the  quotient 

{%'  (z)  %  (z)  -  ^:  (z)  %  (z)]  -  {%  (z)  %  (z)}, 
then  (f)  (z)  is  doubly-periodic  with  periods  tt  and  ttt  ;   and  the  only  possible 
poles  of  (f)(z)  are  simple  poles  at  points  congruent  to  ^tt  and  -tt  +  ^'^t. 

Now  consider  cf)  iz  +~'7rT\;  from  the  relations  of  §  21'11,  namely 
%(^z  +  l7rT^^iq-h-''%{z),    %(^z  +  l7rT^=iq'ie'-''%(z), 
%  [z  +  Jttt)  =q-^e-''  %(z),      %  (z  +  ^ttt)  =  q'ie-''  %{z), 


we  easily  see  that 

(/>  (s  +  I  ttt)  =  { -  X  (^)  ^:  (^)  +  %'  (^)  ^4  (^)}  ^  {%  {Z)  X  {Z)]. 

Hence  ^  {z)  is  doubly-periodic  with  periods  tt  and  ^  ttt  ;  and,  relative  to 
these  periods,  the  only  possible  poles  of  (j)  (z)  are  simple  poles  at  points 
congruent  to  g  tt. 

Therefore  (|  20-12),  <^{z)  is  a  constant;  and  making  z^O,  we  see  that 
the  value  of  this  constant  is  j^/  ^4]  h-  {^2  ^3}  =  V- 


21-6,   21-61]  THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS  471 

We  have  therefore  established  the  important  result  that 
writing  ^  =  %  (z)/'^i(z)  and  making  use  of  the  results  of  §  21 '2,  we  see  that 

(^y=(v-pv)(v-rv). 

This  differential  equation  possesses  the  solution  ^i{z)l^i{z).  It  is  not 
difficult  to  see  that  the  general  solution  is  ±  '^i  (^  +  a)/^4  (z  +  a)  where  a 
is  the  constant  of  integration ;  since  this  quotient  changes  sign  when  a  is 
increased  by  tt,  the  negative  sign  may  be  suppressed  without  affecting  the 
generality  of  the  solution. 


Example  1.     Shew  that 
Example  2.     Shew  that 


1    fV!)l  _.2Mi)Mi) 

dz\3,{z)j  ""^  h{z)h{^y 


21'61.     The  genesis  of  the  Jacohian  Elliptic  function*  sn  u. 
The  differential  equation 

fy=(v-rv)(v-rv), 

which  was  obtained  in  §  21 '6,  may  be  brought  to  a  canonical  form  by  a  slight 
change  of  variable. 

Writef  ^%l%  =  y,     z%^  =  u; 

then,  if  ^2  ijg  written  in  place  of  B^o/^s,  the  equation  determining  y  in  terms 
of  u  is 


(iy=(i-/)<i-*:f>- 


This  differential  equation  has  the  particular  solution 

The  function  of  u  on  the  right  has  multipliers  —  1,  +1  associated  with 
the  periods  ir^^,  ttt^s^;  it  is  therefore  a  doubly-periodic  function  with 
periods  27r^3^  irr^^.  In  any  cell,  it  has  two  simple  poles  at  the  points 
congruent  to  ^77x^3^  and  'rr^.^  +  ^ttt^^  ;  and,  on  account  of  the  nature  of  the 
quasi-periodicity  of  y,  the  residues  at  these  points  are  equal  and  opposite  in 
sign ;  the  zeros  of  the  function  are  the  points  congruent  to  0  and  tt^jI 

*  Jacobi  and  other  early  writers  used  the  notation  sin  am  in  place  of  sn. 
t  Notice,  from  the  formulae  of  §  21  "3,  that  ^2=1=0,  Ss  +  O  when  j  </  ]  <;  1,  except  when  ^  =  0,  in 
which  case  the  Theta-functions  degenerate ;  the  substitutions  are  therefore  legitimate. 


472  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

It  is  customary  to  regard  y  as  depending  on  k  rather  than  on  q ;  and  to 
exhibit  t/  as  a  function  of  u  and  k,  we  write 

?/  ==  sn  {u,  k), 
or  simply  y  =  sn.u. 

It  is  now  evident  that  sn  {u,  k)  is  an  elliptic  function  of  the  second 
of  the  types  described  in  §  20-13  ;  when  g  -*  0  (so  that  k  -^  0),  it  is  easy  to  see 
that  sn  {u,  k)  -^  sin  u. 

The  constant  k  is  called  the  modulus ;  if  k'^=%/%,  so  that  k^  +  k'^  =  l, 
k'  is  called  the  complementary  modulus.  The  quasi -periods  tt^s^  7rT%^  are 
usually  written  2K,  2iK',  so  that  sn  (u,  k)  has  periods  4/^,  2iK'. 

From  §21-51,  we   see   that  2Z' =  77^3^(0  |  r'),  so   that  K'  is  the  same 
function  of  r'  as  K  is  of  r,  when  tt'  =  —  1. 
•  Example  1.     Shew  that 

(^2  \  (S)  '    54  (2)  S4  (/)  ' 


^    •&  (z) 
and  deduce  that,  if  y=  r^  q^(>   ^'^^'^  u=zB3\  then 

■^2  '^4  (,'2j 


Example  2.     Shew  that 


rf^  ^4  (2)  ^    ^4  (2)  -34  (2)  ' 


S  S  (z) 
and  deduce  that,  if  i/=-^  ^^      ,  and  ?f  =  0^a2,  then 

^3  ^4  (s) 

(IT =(i-f  </-'">• 

'   Example  3.     Obtain  the  following  results : 

2/''A''\- 

-— -j    =54=l-2^  +  2yH2y9-..., 

/i"  =  A'7r-ilog(l/ry). 
[These  results  are  convenient  for  calculating  k,  k',  K,  K'  when  q  is  given.] 

21-62.  Jacobi's  earlier  notation*.  The  Theta- function  0  (m)  and  the 
Eta-function  H  (u). 

The  presence  of  the  factors  ''^■f^  in  the  expression  for  sn  {u,  k)  renders  'it 
sometimes  desirable  to  use  the  notation  which  Jacobi  employed  in  the 
Fundamenta  Nova,  and  subsequently  discarded.  The  function  which  is  of 
primary  importance  with  this  notation  is  (d  (u),  defined  by  the  equation 

(H)  (u)  =  ^4  {u%-'  1  t), 
so  that  the  periods  associated  with  0  (u)  are  2K  and  2iK'. 

*  This  is  the  notation  employed  throughout  the  Fundamenta  Nova. 


21-62,   21-7]  THE  THETA    FUNCTIONS  473 

The  function  S{u  +  K)  then  replaces  ^3  (z) ;  and  in  place  of  ^1  (z)  we 
have  the  function  H  (u)  defined  by  the  equation 

H  (w)  =  -  iq  ^  i  e*""^^"'^>  0  (u  +  iK')  =  ^,  (u%-^  I  t), 

and  ^2  (-3")  is  replaced  by  H  (u  +  ^). 

The  reader  will  have  no  difficulty  in  translating  the  analysis  of  this 
chapter  into  Jacobi's  earlier  notation. 

•  Example  1.  If  Q'  (u)——j^,  shew  that  the  singularities  of  — j-i-  are  simple  poles 
at  the  points  congruent  to  iK'  (mod  2K,  'iik') ;  and  the  residue  at  each  singularity  is  1. 

•  Example  2.     Shew  that 

H'(0)=|7rA'-iH  (/i )  e  (0)  e  (^). 

21*7.     The  problem  of  Inversion. 

Up  to  the  present,  the  Jacobian  elliptic  function  sn  {u,  k)  has  been 
implicitly  regarded  as  depending  on  the  parameter  q  rather  than  on  the 
modulus  k ;  and  it  has  been  shewn  that  it  satisfies  the  differential  equation 

/dsn  uy      ,  „    X  /,      7„     „    N 

V^^tTJ  =a-sn^«0(l-^^sn^w), 

where  P  =  %*  (0,  q)/%'  (0,  q). 

But,  in  those  problems  of  Applied  Mathematics  in  which  elliptic  functions 
occur,  we  have  to  deal  with  the  solution  of  the  differential  equation 

in  which  the  modulus  k  is  given,  and  we  have  no  a  priori  knowledge  of  the 
value  of  q ;  and,  to  prove  the  existence  of  an  analytic  function  sn  {u,  k) 
which  satisfies  this  equation,  we  have  to  shew  that  a  number  r  exists*  such 
that 

k'  =  %*(0\T)/%^{O\T). 

When  this  number  t  has  been  shewn  to  exist,  the  function  sn{u,  k)  can 
be  constructed  as  a  quotient  of  Theta-functions,  satisfying  the  differential 
equation  and  possessing  the  properties  of  being  doubly-periodic  and  analytic 
except  at  simple  poles;  and  also 

lim  sn  (u,  k)lu  =  1. 
That  is  to  say,  we  can  invert  the  integral 

so  as  to  obtain  the  equation  y  =  sn  {u,  k). 

*  The  existence  of  a  number  r,  for  which  /  (r)  >  0,  involves  the  existence  of  a  number  q  such 
that  I  (/  I  <  1.  An  alternative  procedure  would  be  to  discuss  the  differential  equation  directly, 
after  the  manner  of  Chapter  x. 


474  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXr 

The  difficulty,  of  course,  arises  in  shewing  that  the  equation 
c  =  ^,^(0  1t)/V(0|t), 
(where  c  has  been  written  for  k^),  has  a  solution. 

When*  0<c<l,  it  is  easy  to  shew  that  a  solution  exists.  From  the 
identity  given  in  §  21'2  corollary,  it  is  evident  that  it  is  sufficient  to  prove 
the  existence  of  a  solution  of  the  equation 

1_c  =  V(0|t)/V(01t), 


which  may  be  written  1  —  c  =  11  , 

w=i  \i  +  q 

Now,  as  q  increases  from  0  to  1,  the  product  on  the  right  is  continuous 
and  steadily  decreases  from  1  to  0  ;  and  so  (§  3*63)  it  passes  through  the 
value  1  —  c  once  and  only  once.  Consequently  a  solution  of  the  equation 
in  T  exists  and  the  problem  of  inversion  may  be  regarded  as  solved. 

21*71.     The  problem  of  inversion  for  complex  values  of  c.      The  modular  functions 

f{r\g(j\  h{r). 

The  problem  of  inversion  may  be  regarded  as  a  problem  of  Integral  Calculus,  and  it 
may  be  proved,  by  somewhat  lengthy  algebraical  investigations  involving  a  discussion  of 

the  behaviour  of   I    {\—fi)   "^  {I-  k'^fi)    ^  dt^  when  y  lies  on  a  '  Riemann  surface,'  that  the 

y  0 
problem  of  inversion  possesses  a  solution.     For  an  exhaustive  discussion  of  this  aspect  of 
the  problem,  the  reader  is  referred  to  Hancock,  Elliptic  Functions,  Vol.  i. 

It  is,  however,  more  in  accordance  with  the  spirit  of  this  work  to  prove  by  Cauchy's 
method  (§  6-31)  that  the  equation  c  =  52*  (0  |  r)/^^*  (0  |  r)  has  one  root  lying  in  a  certain 
domain  of  the  r-plane  and  that  (subject  to  certain  limitations)  this  root  is  an  analytic 
function  of  c,  when  c  is  regarded  as  variable.  It  has  been  seen  that  the  existence  of  this 
root  yields  the  solution  of  the  inversion  i:)roblem,  so  that  the  existence  of  the  Jacobian 
elliptic  function  with  given  modulus  k  will  have  been  demonstrated. 

The  method  just  indicated  has  the  advantage  of  exhibiting  the  potentialities  of  what 
are  known  as  modular  functions.  The  general  theory  of  these  functions  (which  are  of 
great  importance  in  connexion  with  the  Theories  of  Transformation  of  Elliptic  Functions) 
has  been  considered  in  a  treatise  by  Klein  and  Fricke  +. 

Let  /(O^^IO.-  n  j^-tf"-^r  =  '^^^^^ 

-     fl-e'-""^)"'^|  8  _  ^4^  (0  I  r) 
^^^'      ,"    |,l+>-l)-/    ~53*(0|r)' 
Hr)=-f{r)lg{T). 
Then,  if  Tr'=  —  1,  the  functions  just  introduced  possess  the  following  properties : 
/(r  +  2)=/(r),  g{r  +  2)==g{r\         f{r)+g{r)=\, 

/  (r  +  1 )  =  /.  (r ),         /  (r')  =g  (r),  g  (r')  =/  (r), 

by  §§  21-2  corollary,  21-51  example  1. 

*  This  is  the  case  whicli  is  of  practical  importance. 

t  F.  Klein,  Vorlesumicn  ilhcr  die  Theorie  der  clUptischen  Modulfunktionen,  auspearbeitet 
iind  rervolhtiindigt  von  R.  Fricke.     (Leipzig,  1890.) 


21-71,  21-711] 


THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS 


475 


It  is  easy  to  see  that  as  /(t)  -»•  +-oo  ,  the  functions  Jj5^«~"'"/(r)=/,  (t)  and  g  (t)  tend  to 
unity,  uniformly  with  resj)ect  to  R (t),  when  —\^R{t)^\  ;  and  the  derivates  of  these  two 
functions  (with  regard  to  r)  tend  uniformly  to  zero*  in  the  same  circumstances. 

21*711.     The  principal  solution  of  f(T)  —  c=^0. 

It  has  been  seen  in  §  6-31  that,  if  /(t)  is  analytic  inside  and  on  any  contour,  2'iTi  times 
the  number  of  roots  of  the  equation  /(r)  -c  =  0  inside  the  contour  is  equal  to 

1        clfir) 


h 


dr, 


lf(T)-C     dr 

taken  round  the  contour  in  question. 

Take    the   contour    ABCDEFE'D'C'B'A   shewn   in   the   figure,   it    being    supposed 
temporarily  t  that  f{r)  —  c  has  no  zero  actually  on  the  contour. 

E'  .  F  .  E 


-1  0  1 

The  contour  is  constructed  in  the  following  manner : 

FE  is  drawn  parallel  to  the  real  axis,  at  a  large  distance  from  it. 

AB  is  the  inverse  of  FE  with  respect  to  the  circle  |  t  |  =1. 

BC  is  the  inverse  of  ED  with  respect  to  j  r  |  =  1,  i)  being  chosen  so|that  D\=AO. 

By  elementary  geometry,  it  follows  that,  since  G  and  D  are  inverse  points  and  1  is  its 
own  inverse,  the  circle  on  Dl  as  diameter  passes  through  C ;  and  so  the  arc  CD  of  this 
circle  is  the  reflexion  of  the  arc  AB  in  the  line  R{t)  =  \. 

The  left-hand  half  of  the  figure  is  the  reflexioji  of  the  right-hand   half  in  the  line 

R{r)  =  0. 

*  This  follows  from  the  expressions  for  the  Theta-f unctions  as  power  series  in  q,  it  being 
observed  that  |  g  |  ■^-  0  as  I  (r)  ^-  4-  oo  . 

t  The  values  of /(r)  at  points  on  the  contour  are  discussed  in  §  21-712. 


476  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

It  will  now  be  shewji  that,  unless*  c^l  or  c^O,  the  equation  /(r)  -c=0  has  one,  and 
only  one,  root  inside  the  contour,  provided  that  FE  is  sufficiently  distant  from  the  real 
axis.     This  root  will  be  called  the  principal  root  of  the  equation. 

To  establish  the  existence  of  this  root,  consider    I  -r— r '-i      dr  taken  along  the 

Jf{r)-c     dr 

various  portions  of  the  contour. 
Since  /(r  +  2)  =  /(r),  we  have 

[J  BE     ]  E'D']  J{t)-C     dr 

Also,  as  T  describes  BC  and  B'C,  r'(=  — 1/r)  describes  E'D'  and  ED  respectively; 
and  so 

{]  BG     J  C'B')  f{r)-C     dr  [J  BC     J  C'B')  g{r)-G      dr 

[J  E'D'     J  DE)   g{r)-G     dr 
=  0, 
because  ^(r'  + 2)=^  (r'),  and  consequently  corresponding  elements  of  the  integrals  cancel. 
Since  f  (r±l)  =  /i  (r),  we  have 

D'C      J  CD)  fir)- G     dr  jB'ABh{T)-C      dr 

but  as  /  describes  B'AB,  r  describes  EE',  and  so  the  integral  round  the  complete  contour 
reduces  to 

df{r),  1  dh  jr')   ^        1      df  jr')]   ^^ 


jEE'\f{r)  —  c     dr         Ii{t')-c      dr  f{r')      dr 

=   (  f        1  dfjr)  J.  dhjr)  1  dg(r)] 

jEE'\f{r)-C     dr         A  (r)  {1  -  C  . /i  (t)}      dr     '^  g  {t)  -  C     dr\        ' 

Now  as  EE'  moves  off  to  infinityt, /(■r)-c-»-- 0  4=0,  ,9(7-)— c^»- 1 -c=}=0,  and  so  the 
limit  of  the  integral  is 

]  E'E  1  -  c  .  A  (r)    [  dr  dr        J 

But  l-c./i(r)^l, /i(r)-^l,  ^i(r)^l,  ^^^0,  ^^^ ^ 0,  and  so  the  limit  of  the 

(XT  dr 

integral  is 


/ 


TTldT—^TTi. 
E'E 


Now,  if  we  choose  EE'  to  be  initially  so  far  from  the  real  axis  that/(r)  -  c,  \-c.h  (r), 
g(T)-c  have  no  zeros  when  r  is  above  EE',  then  the  contour  will  pass  over  no  zeros 
of /W-*^'  ;^«  ^^"  moves  off  to  infinity  and  the  radii  of  the  arcs  CD,  UC,  B'AB  diminish 
to  zero ;  and  then  the  integral  will  not  change  as  the  contour  is  modified,  and  so  the 
original  contour  integral  will  be  2ni,  and  the  number  of  zeros  of  /'(r)  -c  inside  the  original 
contour  will  be  precisely  one. 

*  It  is  sbewn  in  §  21-712  that,  if  c  ^  1  or  c  ^  0,  then  /(r)  -  c  has  a  zero  on  the  contour. 
t  It  has  been  supposed  temporarily  that  c  4=  0  and  c  +  1. 


<">=i^-/. 


21-712-21-73J  THE  THETA   FUNCTIONS  477 

21*712.      The  values  of  the  modular  function  fir)  on  the  contour  considered. 

We  now  have  to  discuss  the  point  mentioned  at  the  beginning  of  §  21"711,  concerning 
the  zeros  of /(t)  —  c  on  the  lines*  joining  +1  to  ±H-xit  and  on  the  semicircles  of 
OjBCI,  (-1)(7'5'0. 

As  T  goes  from  1  to  1  +<»  *  or  from  —  1  to  -  1  +  &  i,  /(t)  goes  from  —  oo  to  0  through 
real  negative  values.  So,  if  c  is  negative,  we  make  an  indentation  in  DE  and  a  corre- 
sponding indentation  in  D'E' ;  and  the  integrals  along  the  indentations  cancel  in  virtue  of 
the  relation  /(r  +  2)=/(r). 

As  T  describes  the  semicircle  05(71,  t'  goes  from  —  1  +  oo  i  to  —  1,  aud/(r)=^(r')  =  1  -/(t'), 
and  goes  from  1  to  -}-  oo  through  real  values ;  it  would  be  possible  to  make  indentations  in 
BC  and  EC  to  avoid  this  difficulty,  but  we  do  not  do  so  for  the  following  reason  :  the 
effect  of  changing  the  sign  of  the  imaginary  part  of  a  number  is  to  change  the  sign  of  the 
real  part  of  t.  Now,  if  0<  iZ  (c)  <  1  and  /(c)  be  small,  this  merely  makes  t  cross  QF  by  a 
short  path;  if  li{c)<0,  t  goes  from  BE  to  D'E'  (or  vice  versa)  and  the  value  of  q  alters 
only  slightly ;  but  if  E  (c)>l,  t  goes  from  BC  to  B'C,  and  so  q  is  not  a  one- valued  function 
of  c  so  far  as  circuits  round  c=  -|- 1  are  concerned  ;  to  make  q  a  one- valued  function  of  c, 
we  cut  the  c-plane  from  +\  to  +oo  ;  and  then  for  values  of  c  in  the  cut  plane,  q  is 
determined  as  a  one-valued  analytic  function  of  c,  say  q{c),  by  the  formula  q(c)  =  e"^'''^^' 
where 

dfir) 
f{T)-c     dr 

as  may  be  seen  from  §  6-3,  by  using  the  method  of  §  5'22. 

If  c  describes  a  circuit  not  surrounding  the  point  c=l,  q{c)  is  one-valued,  but  t{c)  is 
one-valued  only  if,  in  addition,  the  circuit  does  not  surround  the  point  c  =  0. 

21  •72.     The  periods,  regarded  as  functions  of  the  modidus. 

Since  ^=^5x53^(0,  q)  we  see  from  v:^  21-712  that  K  is  a  one-valued  analytic  function  of 
c{  =  k^)  when  a  cut  from  1  to  -i-oo  is  made  in  the  c-plane;  but  since  K'=  —  irK,  we  see 
that  K'  is  not  a  one-valued  function  of  c  unless  an  additional  cut  is  made  from  0  to  —  oc  ; 
it  will  appear  later  (§  22-32)  that  the  cut  from  1  to  -|-  oo  which  was  necessary  so  far  as 
K  is  concerned  is  not  necessary  as  regards  K'. 

21*73.     The  inversion-problem  associated  with   Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  when  invariants  g.^^  and  g^  are  given,  such  that  g^^'ilg^,  it 
is  possible  to  construct  the  Weierstrassian  elliptic  function  with  these  invariants  ;  that  is 
to  say,  we  shall  shew  that  it  is  possible  to  construct  periods  2a)i,  2aj2  such  that  the  function 

^  (z  I  0)1 ,  0*2)  has  invariants  g2  and  gs . 

The  problem  is  solved  if  we  can  obtain  a  solution  of  the  differential  equation 

of  the  form  ^^^  {^\<^iy  (^2)- 

We  proceed  to  effect  the  solution  of  the  equation  with  the  aid  of  Theta-functions. 
Let  v  =  Az,  where  A  is  a  constant  to  be  determined  presently. 

*  We  have  seen  that  EE'  can  be  so  chosen  that/(T)  -c  has  no  zeros  eitlier  on  EE'  or  on 
the  small  circular  arcs. 


478  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

By  the  methods  of  §  21-6,  it  is  easily  seen  that 

•82'  (v)  ^1  (v)  -  Si  (")  52  (v)  =  -  ^3  {v)  ^4  (^)  S2\ 
and  hence,  using  the  results  of  §  21-2,  we  have 

Now  let  ei,  62,  63  be  the  roots  of  the  equation  Ay^-g^y-g^^O,  chosen  in  such  an  order 
that  (ei-e3)/(ei-e2)  is  not*  a  real  number  greater  than  unity  or  negative. 
In  these  circumstances  the  equation 

ei  -  63  ^  V  (0  I  r) 

61-62      53*(0|r) 

possesses  a  solution  (§  21-712)  such  that  /(r)>0;  this  equation  determines  the  parameter 
T  of  the  Theta-functions,  which  has,  up  till  now,  been  at  our  disposal. 

Choosing  r  in  this  manner,  let  A  be  next  chosen  so  thatt 

/12V  =  ei-e3. 
Then  the  function 

satisfies  the  equation 

(j)''=4(2/-6i)(y-e2)Cy-e3). 

The  periods  of  y,  qua  function  of  z,  are  it  A ,  ttt/A  ;  calling  these  2a)i ,  2a)2  we  have 

/((»2/cOl)>0. 

The  function  ^(z\coi,  ©2)  niay  be  constructed  with  these  periods,  and  it  is  easily 
seen  that  ^{z)-A'^  Q-JfAA  ^3^(0  I  ^)  ^t^i^  1  r)-ei  is  an  elliptic  function  with  no  pole  at 
the  origin  | ;  it  is  therefore  a  constant,  C,  say. 

If  G-j,  6*3  be  the  invariants  of  p  {z\  a>i,  u^),  we  have 

4Fi^)-(^2P{^)-Gs  =  r"{z)  =  'iW{z)-C-e,}  {p{z)-C-e^i  {p{z)-C-e,}, 
and  so,  comparing  coefficients  of  powers  of  ^  (z),  we  have 

0  =  12C,     G^2=.72-12C2,     G'3=^3-^2C+4C3. 
Hence  C=0,     G.,==g2,     ^3=9^; 

and  so  the  function  ^J  (2  |  wi ,  a^)  '^^'ith  the  required  invariants  has  been  constructed. 

21*8.     lite  numerical  computation  of  elliptic  functions. 

The  series  proceeding  in  ascending  powers  of  q  are  convenient  for 
calculating  Theta-functions  generally,  even  when  |  g'  [  is  as  large  as  0"9.  But 
it  usually  happens  in  practice  that  the  modulus  k  is  given  and  the  calculation 


*  If  ^^  >  1,  then  0  <  ^^  <  1 ;  and  if  '^  <  0,  then  1  -  ^^  >  1,  and 


''k 

-1 


<1. 

The  values  0,  1,  cc  of  (cj  -  e3)/((?i  -  e.^)  are  excluded  since  g'J^^^Tgz^- 

+  The  sign  attached  to  J  is  a  matter  of  indifference,  since  we  deal  exclusively  with  even 
functions  of  v  and  z. 

X  The  terms  in  z-^  cancel,  and  there  is  no  term  in  s"!  because  the  function  is  even. 


21-8]  THE  THETA   FUNCTIONS  479 

of  K,  K'  and  q  is  necessary.  It  will  be  seen  later  (§§  22*301,  22*32)  that 
K,  K'  are  expressible  in  terms  of  hypergeometric  functions,  by  the  equations 

but  these  series  converge  slowly  except  when  |  k  \  and  |  k'  \  respectively  are 
quite  small ;  so  that  the  series  are  never  simultaneously  suitable  for  numerical 
calculations. 

To  obtain  more  convenient  series  for  numerical  work,  we  first  calculate  q 
as  a  root  of  the  equation  k  =  ^./(O,  q)l^i  (0,  q),  and  then  obtain  K  from  the 

formula  ^  =  ^7r^3'^(0,  q)  and  K'  from  the  formula 

K'  =  'rr--K\oge{llq). 

The  equation  k  =  V  (0,  ^)/V  (0,  q) 

is  equivalent  to*  '^Jk' =  ^i{0,  q)l%{0,  q). 

Writing  2e  =  _ -,, ,  (so  that  0  <  e  <  -  when  0  <  A;  <  1),  we  get 

^  %{Q,q)-^,  (0,  q)  ^  X  {0,q^ 
^     %iO,q)  +  %{0,q)      %{0,q^)- 

We   have   seen   (§§21*71-21*712)  that  this  equation  in  q*  possesses   a 

solution  which  is  an  analytic  function  of  e*  when  |  e  j  <  ^ ;  and  so  q  will  be 

expansible  in  a  Maclaurin  series  in  powers  of  e  in  this  domainf. 

It   remains   to  determine  the  coefficients  in    this   expansion   from  the 

equation 

_    g  +  g^  +  ^-°  +  .  ■ . 

^  ~  1  +  2q*^  2gi«  +  . . . ' 
which  may  be  written 

q=€  +  2q*6-q'>  +  2q"'e- q-'+ ...; 
the  reader  will  easily  verify  by  continually  substituting  e  +  2q'^€  —  q^  +  ... 
for  q  wherever  q  occurs  on  the  right  that  the  first  few  terms  j  are  given  by 

q  =  e+2€'  +  1563  +  1506^='  +  0  (e"). 
It  has  just  been  seen  that  this  series  converges  when  j  e  j  <  g. 

[Note.     The  first  two  terms  of  this  expansion  usually  suffice;  thus,  even  if  k  be  as 
large  as  V(0-8704)  =  0  933...,  e  =  |,  2^^  =  0*0000609,  1569  =  0-0000002.] 

Example.      Given  k  =  M  =  \lsJ2,  calculate  q,  K,  K'  by  means  of  the  expansion  just 
obtained,  and  also  by  observing  that  r  =  i,  so  that  q^e"". 
[^  =  0-0432139,     /i:=  A"  =  1-854075.] 

*  In  numerical  work  0  <  A;  <  1,  and  so  q  is  positive  and  0  <  ^/A;'  <  1. 

t  The  Theta-functions  do  not  vanish  when  |  (/  j  <  1  except  at  5  =  0,  so  this  gives  the  only 
possible  branch  point. 

X  This  expansion  was  given  by  Weierstrass,  Werke,  ii.  p.  276. 


480 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XXI 


21  '9.     The  notations  employed  for  the  Theta-ftmctions. 

The  following  scheme  indicates  the  principal  systems  of  notation  which  have  been 
employed  by  various  writers;  the  symbols  in  any  one  column  all  denote  the  same 
function. 


5i  (,r2) 

SA^z) 

33  {m) 

S{m) 

Jacobi                                                 1 

1 

5i(.) 

h{z) 

3s  (z) 

3i{z) 

1 
Tannery  and  Molk 

6x  (W2) 

62  (tO-2) 

63  {<oz) 

6{a>z) 

Briot  and  Bouquet                           ' 

6,{z) 

^2(2) 

e^iz) 

e,{z) 

Weierstrass,  Halphen,  Hancock 

e{z) 

^1(2) 

6z{z) 

02  (Z) 

Jordan,  Harkness  and  Morley 

The  notation  employed  by  Hermite,  H.  J.  S.  Smith  and  some  other  mathematicians  is 
expressed  by  the  equation 

e^  ^{x)=     2     (_)«-2i(2«+^)^gi7r{2«+M)a;/a. 

with  this  notation  the  results  of  §  2ril  example  3  take  the  very  concise  form 

Cayley  employs  Jacobi's  earlier  notation  (§  21-62).  The  advantage  of  the  Weierstrassian 
notation  is  that  unity  (instead  of  n)  is  the  real  period  of  ^3(2)  and  6n{z). 

Jordan's  notation  exhibits  the  analogy  between  the  Theta-functions  and  the  three 
Sigma-functions  defined  in  §  20'421.  The  reader  will  easily  obtain  relations,  similar 
to  that  of  §  21*43,  connecting  ^,.(2)  with  o-,.  (2a)i2)  when  r=l,  2,  3. 

REFERENCES. 

L.  EuLER,  Opera  Omnia,  ser.  1,  Vol.  xx. 

C.  G.  J.  Jacobi,  Fundamenta  Nova*;  Oes.  Math.    Werke,  i.  pp.  497-538. 

C.  Hermite,  Oeuvres  Matheraatiques. 

F.  Klein,    Vorlesungen  iiber  die  Theorie  der  elliptischen  Modulfiinktionen  (Ausgear- 

beitet  und  vervoUstandigt  von  R.  Fricke).     (Leipzig,  1890.) 
H.  Weber,  Elliptische  Funktionen  tmd  algehrai^chc  Zahlen.     (Brunswick,   1891.) 
J.  Tannery  et  J.  Molk,  Fonctions  Elliptiques.     (Paris,  1893-1902.) 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

Obtain  the  addition-formulae 

3y  (//  ^z)3,{y-z)  V  =  53^'  (2/)  3.^  (z)  -  3,^  (y)  S-J^  {z)  =  3{^  (y)  3,^  (z)  -  3^  {y)  3,^  (z), 

S,  {y  +  z)  S,  {y  -  z)  ^^  =  ^4^  (y )  ^./  {z)  -3^^  {y)  3.^  (z)  =  3,^  (y)  S,^  (.*)  -  ^3^  (y)  3,^  (z), 

3,  {y  +  z)  3,  iy  -  z)  54-  =  3,^  iy)  3,'^  (z)  -  3,^  (y)  3./  (z)  =  3-,^  {y)  V  (2)  -  3.J^  (y)  3,^  (z), 

34  iu  +  z)  3,  {y  -  z)  3i'  =  3-/  (y)  3./  (z)  -  3,^  (y)  5./  (z)  =  ^4'^  (y)  3,^  {z)  -  3,^  (y)  3,^  (z). 

(Jacobi.) 
*  Reprinted  in  his  Ges.  Math.  Werke,  i.  pp.  49-239. 


21-9] 


THE   THETA    FUNCTIONS 


481 


•  2.     Obtain  the  addition-formulae 

^4  (y  +  2)  Si  0/-2)  S2'  =  »i'  (y)  V  {z)  +  h'  (y)  ^i^  iz)  =  S2'  iy)  S*^  iz)  +  9^  (y)  ^3^  (z), 

S*  (y  +  z)  ^4  (y-^)  ^3==  =  V  (I/)  V  (2)  +  ^2='  (y)  ^-^  (2)  =  V  (i/)  5*2  (2)  +  S,2  (y)  ^^^  (^)  ; 

and,  by  increasing  1/  by  half  periods,  obtain  the  corresponding  formulae  for 

5r(y  +  2)-9rO/-2)V    and     3r(^  +  z)Sr(^-z)Ss\ 

where  r=l,  2,  3.  (Jacobi.) 

,  3.     Obtain  the  formulae 

^1  (2/  ±  z)  S2  iv + 2)  5354 = Si  (if)  S,  (.y)  53  (z)  S,  {z)  ±  ^3  (j/)  ^4  (y)  5,  (2)  ^2  (2), 

^x(y±^)53  0/+^)-a2-94  =  -»,(2/)-»3(y)'92(2)54(«)±^2(3/)-94(3')^l(2)-»3(2), 

^1  (y  ±^)  S,  {y  +  z)  5,^3  =  ^1  {y)  S,  (3/)  S,  (z)  Ss  (2)  ± S,  {y)  S,  {y)  B,  (z)  S,  (z),     . 

S,(^±z)  3,  0/  +  z)  S2S3  =  S,  (y)  53  (y)  ^2  (z)  S,  {z)  +  &,  {y)  S,  iy)  5i  {z)  3,  (z), 

S2  LV  ±  z)  S*  iv  +  z)  S,3,  =  S,  (y)  3,  (y )  3,  (z)  3^  (z)  +  3,  (y)  ^3  (y)  -^i  (z)  Ss  (z), 

S3(2/±z)Sdy  +  z)3,3,  =  3s(y)3,{y)3^(z)3^{z)  +  3,(y)3,(9/)3,{z)3,iz). 

(Jacobi.) 
4.     Obtain  the  duplication-formulae 

^2  (2y)  5,542=.9,2  cy)  V  (y)  -  ^1^  (y)  ^3^  (y), 
^3  (2y)  -93542=53^  (.'/)  V  (y)  -  ^1^  (y)  52'-^  (y), 
^4(2y)  V  =^3ny)-^2*(y)=V(y)-^i*(y). 


5.  Obtain  the  duplication-formula 

3,  {2y)  3,3^3,^23,  (y)  5^  (y)  S3  (y)  ^4  (y). 

6.  Obtain  duplication-formulae  from  the  results  indicated  in  example  2. 

7.  Shew  that,  with  the  notation  of  §  21  "22, 

[l]-[2]  =  [4]'-[3]',     [l]-[3]  =  [lJ'-[3]',     [l]-[4]  =  [2]'-[3]', 
[2]-[3]  =  [l]'-[4]',     [2] -[4]  =  [2]' -[4]',     [3]-[4]=[2]' -  [1]'. 

8.  Shew  that 

2[1122]  =  [1122]'-j-[2211]'-[4433]'-f[3344]', 
2  [1133]  =  [1133]'-!- [3311]' -[4422]'-!- [2244]', 
2  [1144]  =  [1144]'-f  [4411]' -[3322]'  + [2233]', 
2  [2233]  =  [2233]'  +  [3322]'  -  [441 1]'  +  [1 144]', 
2  [2244]  =  [2244]'  +  [4422]'  -  [331 1  ]'  +  [  1 133]', 
2  [3344]  =  [3344]'  +  [4433]'  -  [22 1 1  ]'  +  [  1 1 22]'. 

9.  Obtain  the  formulae 


(Jacobi.) 


(Jacobi.) 


(Jacobi. 


,2«-l^-2| 
y2n-l\-2\ 


«  =  1 

k^k'-i=2q^  n    {{l  +  q^"f{l-q'' 
10.     Deduce  the  following  results  from  example  9  : 

n  (i-^2»-i)o=2^*F/t"^  n  (i+^2»-i)6^2^*(H-'; 

K=l  «=1 


-k 


n  (!-(/")«      =27r-3fy-'/-X-'A'3, 


n  {l-qnf       =4.7r-'q-hH'-^K-\ 


n  (i-i-j-")" 

H  =  l 


n  (1-hr) 


■■%q 


'kk'- 


■^k^k- 


W.  M.  A. 


(Jacobi.) 
31 


482  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXI 

i'S  '  (z) 

11.  By  considering  I  ^^4-  e^"*^  dz  taken  along  the  contour  formed  by  the  parallelogram 

whose  corners  are  —  iw,  ^tt,  ^tt  +  ttt,  —^tt  +  ttt,  shew  that 

and  deduce  that,  when  [  I{z)  |  <|/(7rr), 

Si{z)_.    '^   9'"sin2?i3 

12.  Obtain  the  following  expansions  : 

&i  (z)        ^        ,    °°  o^"  sin  2?i2 
^^  =  -t.  +  4^./-^-^, 

^3'(z)_.    "^   (-)"g"sin2?i2; 

each  expansion  being  valid  in  the  strip  of  the  3-plane  in  which  the  series  involved  is 

absolutely  convergent. 

(Jacobi.) 

13.  Shew  that,  if  |  /(y)  |  < /(ttt)  and  \I{z)\<I (ttt),  then 

S      (V  +  Z)  $   '  00  00 

n   /  Tn  /  N  =  cot  w  +  cot  2  +  4    2     2  o2""»  sin  (2my + 2nz). 

^1(2/)  ^l(^)  m=ln=l 

(Math.  Trip.  1908.) 

14.  Shew  that,  if  |  I{z)\<^I (ttt),  then' 

— -  ~-r  =  i  «o  +    2    a„  cos  2?12, 
IT     ^i  {Z)       -  n=i 

where  a„  =  2    2   ^("'■+i)(2»+"'+i). 

(Math.  Trip.  1903.) 

[Obtain  a  reduction  formula  for  a„  by  considering  j  {Si{z)}-^e^"^^dz  taken  round  the 
contour  of  example  11.] 


15.     Shew  that 


-^1  (2)      L  ,i = 1  1  -  2y^"  cos  22 + q*\ 


is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  s  with  no  singularities,  and  deduce  that  it  is  zero. 
Prove  similarly  that 

■^2'  (2)  .  ,    ^  o2nsin22 

•^2  (^)  M=i  1  +  2f"  cos  22  +  J''"  ' 

■^3'(2)^_^^  22n-lgijj22 

^3  (2)  ,,=1  1 1  2p"  ^^cos  2i+q*''-^  ' 

^4  (•j)        «=i  1  +2^'-"- 1  COS  22  + j^''-^  • 
16.     Obtain  the  values  of  k,  I-',  A',  A"  correct  to  six  places  of  decimals  when  q  =  ^Q. 
[/?,■  =  0-895769,       /{•'  =  0-4445 18, 
A=  2-262700,     A"  =  1-658414.] 


THE   THETA   FUNCTIONS  483 

17.  Shew  that,  ii  w+x  +  i/+z=0,  then,  with  the  notation  of  §  21-22, 

[3]+[l]=[2]  +  [4], 

[1234]+[3412]  +  [2143]  +  [4321]  =  0. 

18.  Shew  that 

19.  By  putting  x=y=z,  w«=3;»  in  Jacobi's  fundamental  formulae,  obtain  the  following 
results : 

B^  {x)  ^1  (3^)+^43  {x)  Si  {3x)  =  Si^  {2x)  $t, 

^3^  (^)  ^3  (3.r)  -  .943  (x)  9i  (3a;)  =  V  (2^)  K 
^/  (x)  ^2  (3^)  +  ^43  (x)  Si  {3x):=S3^  {2x)  Ss. 

20.  Deduce  from  example  19  that 

{Si^  (x)  Si  {3x)  Si^ + Si^  {x)  Si  {3x)  Si'f  +  {S^^  (x)  S3  {3x)  S^^  -  S^  {x)  Si  {3x)  S^^f 

=  {Si  (x)  S,  {3x)  Ss^  +  Si^  (x)  Si  {3x)  S,f. 
(Trinity,  1882.) 


31—2 


CHAPTER  XXII 

THE   JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS 

22"1.     Elliptic  functions  with  two  simple  poles. 

In  the  course  of  proving  general  theorems  concerning  elliptic  functions 
at  the  beginning  of  Chapter  XX,  it  was  shewn  that  two  classes  of  elliptic 
functions  were  simpler  than  any  others  so  far  as  their  singularities  were 
concerned,  namely  the  elliptic  functions  of  order  2.  The  first  class  consists 
of  those  with  a  single  double  pole  (with  zero  residue)  in  each  cell,  the  second 
consists  of  those  with  two  simple  poles  in  each  cell,  the  sum  of  the  residues 
at  these  poles  being  zero. 

An  example  of  the  first  class,  namely  ^{z),  was  discussed  at  length  in 
Chapter  xx ;  in  the  present  chapter  we  shall  discuss  various  examples  of 
the  second  class,  known  as  Jacohian  elliptic  functions* . 

It  will  be  seen  (§22"122,  note)  that,  in  certain  circumstances,  the  Jacobian 
functions  degenerate  into  the  ordinary  circular  functions ;  accordingly,  a 
notation  (invented  by  Jacobi  and  modified  by  Gudermann  and  Glaisher)  will 
be  employed  which  emphasizes  an  analogy  between  the  Jacobian  functions 
and  the  circular  functions. 

From  the  theoretical  aspect,  it  is  most  simple  to  regard  the  Jacobian 
functions  as  quotients  of  Theta-functions  (§  21"61).  But  as  many  of  their 
fundamental  properties  can  be  obtained  by  quite  elementary  methods, 
without  appealing  to  the  theor}^  of  Theta-functions,  we  shall  discuss  the 
functions  without  making  use  of  Chapter  xxi  except  when  it  is  desirable 
to  do  so  for  the  sake  of  brevity  or  simplicity. 

22"11.     The  Jacohian  elliptic  functions,  sn  u,  en  u,  dnii. 
It  was  shewn  in  §  21 -61  that  if 

^  ^,  MW V) 
^"^,  M^/V)' 
the  Theta-functions  being  formed  with  parameter  r,  then 

*  These  functions  were  introduced  by  Jacobi,  but  many  of  their  properties  were  obtained 
independently  by  Abel,   who  used  a  different  notation.     See  the  note  on  p.  505. 


221,   22-11]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  485 

where  ^•^  =  ^2  (0  i  t)/^3  (0 1  t)-  Conversely,  if  the  constant  k  (called  the 
modulus*)  be  given,  then,  unless  k^^\  or  P  ^  0,  a  value  of  t  can  be  found 
(§§  21-7-21-712)  for  which  V(0|  t)/V(0  |  t)  =  A;^^  so  that  the  solution 
of  the  differential  equation 

subject  to  the  condition  \-r-]  =  1  is 

\duJu  =  y  =  t) 

_%%(u/%') 

the  Theta-functions  being  formed  with  the  parameter  t  which  has  been 
determined. 

The  differential  equation  may  be  written 

u=      {l-t')-^(l-kH')-^dt, 

J  0 

and,  by  the  methods  of  §  21 '7 3,  it  may  be  shewn  that,  if  y  and  u  are  con- 
nected by  this  integral  formula,  y  may  be  expressed  in  terms  of  u  as  the 
quotient  of  two  Theta-functions,  in  the  form  already  given. 

Thus,  if 

fy 

w=      (l-t')-i(l-kH')-idt, 

J  0 

y  may  be  regarded  as  the  function  of  u  defined  by  the  quotient  of  the  Theta- 
functions,  so  that  y  is  an  analytic  function  of  u  except  at  its  singularities, 
which  are  all  simple  poles ;  to  denote  this  functional  dependence,  we  write 

y  =  sn  (u,  k), 
or  simply  y  =  sn  w,  when  it  is  unnecessary  to  emphasize  the  modulusf. 
The  function  sn  u  is  known  as  a  Jacohian  elliptic  function  of  a,  and 

on  w  -—  ^1  (^AsO  /*  . 

'^"-^,^,(W) ^^> 

[Unless  the  theory  of  the  Theta-functions  is  assumed,  it  is  exceedingly  difficult  to  shew- 
that  the  integral  formula  defines  y  as  a  function  of  u  which  is  analytic  except  at  simple 
poles.     Cf.  Hancock,  Elliptic  Functions,  Vol.  i.] 

Nowwite  c„(»,i)  =  ||gM (B). 

dnoa-)4:lw! <c)- 

Then,  from  the  relation  of  §  21*6,  we  have 

^-  snM  =  cnzidnw    (I), 

dii  ^  ' 

*  If  0  <  fc  <  1,  and  Q  is  the  acute  angle  such  that  siu  d  =  k,  ^  is  called  the  modular  angle. 
t  The  modulus  will  always  be  inserted  when  it  is  not  k. 


486  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

and  from  the  relations  of  §  21-2,  we  have 

sn^  u  +  cn^u  =  l .(II), 

¥sn^u  +  dn^u  =  l  (Ill), 

and,  obviously,  cnO  =  dnO=l  (IV). 

We  shall  now  discuss  the  properties  of  the  functions  sn  u,  en  ?«,  dn  to  as  defined  by  the 
equations  (A),  (B),  (C)  by  using  the  four  relations  (1),  (II),  (III),  (IV) ;  these  four  relations 
are  sufficient  to  make  sn  u,  en  «,  dn  u  determinate  functions  of  u.  It  will  be  assumed, 
when  necessary,  that  sn  %,  en  u,  dn  ti  are  one- valued  functions  of  u,  analytic  except  at  their 
poles ;  it  will  also  be  assumed  that  they  are  one-valued  analytic  functions  of  k^  when  cuts 
are  made  in  the  plane  of  the  complex  variable  F  from  1  to  -f  oo  and  from  0  to  —  oo . 

22*12.     Simple  properties  of  sn  u,  cnu,  dn  u. 

From  the  integral  u=  I    (1  —t-)"^  (1  —  kH^)'^  dt,  it  is  evident,  on  writing 

Jo 

—  t  for  t,  that,  if  the  sign  of  y  be  changed,  the  sign  of  u  is  also  changed. 

Hence  sn  u  is  an  odd  function  of  u. 

Since  sn  (—u)=  —  sn  u,  it  follows  from  (II)  that  en  (—  m)  =  +  en  m  ;  on 
account  of  the  one-valuedness  of  en  u,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation 
it  follows  that  either  the  upper  sign,  or  else  the  lower  sign,  must  always  be 
taken.  In  the  special  case  u  =  0,  the  upper  sign  has  to  be  taken,  and  so  it 
has  to  be  taken  always ;  hence  en  (—  u)  =  en  u,  and  en  u  is  an  even  function 
of  u.     In  like  manner,  dn  u  is  an  even  function  of  u. 

These  results  are  also  obvious  from  the  definitions  (A),  (B)  and  (C)  of 
§  2211. 

Next,  let  us  differentiate  the  equation  sn-  «*  -f  cn^  m  =  1 ;  on  using  equation 
(I),  we  get 

d  en  H  . 

— -, —  =  —  sn  w  dn  M  ; 
du 

in  like  manner,  from  equations  (III)  and  (I)  we  have 

ddnu         ,  „ 

— J =  —  A;^  sn  M  en  u. 

du 

22'121.     The  complementary  modulus. 

If  A;^  -f-  A:'-  =  1  and  k'  ^  +  1  as  k-*0,  k'  is  known  as  the  complementary 
modulus.  On  account  of  the  cut  in  the  /..-^-plane  from  1  to  +  oo ,  A;'  is  a  one- 
valued  function  of  k. 

[With  the  aid  of  the  Theta-functions,  we  can  make  k'^  one-valued,  by  defining  it  to  be 

54(0|r)/53(0|r).] 
-    Example.     Shew  that,  if 

«  =  I  \  1  -  ^2) -  i  (X''2  +  ]cH^)~^ dt, 
J  u 
the"  y  =  en  i^a^k). 


22-12-22-2]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  487 

Also,  shew  that,  if  «=  f  {l-t^y^  {t'^-if^r^dt, 

J  V 

then  y=dn(M,  k). 

[These  results  are  sometimes  written  in  the  form 

J  cnu  J  dn Jt  » 

22*122.     Glaisher's  flotation*  for  quotients. 

A  short  and  convenient  notation  has  been  invented  by  Glaisher  to  express 
reciprocals  and  quotients  of  the  Jacobian  elliptic  functions ;  the  reciprocals 
are  denoted  by  reversing  the  order  of  the  letters  which  express  the  function, 

thus 

nsu  =  l/snu,     ncu^l/cnu,     ndM  =  l/dnrf; 

while  quotients  are   denoted   by  writing  in  order  the  first  letters  of  the 
numerator  and  denominator  functions,  thus 

sc  w  =  sn  u/cn  u,     sd  m  =  sn  u/dn  u,     cd  w  =  en  w/dn  u, 

cs  w  =  en  uJBXi  u,     dsu  =  dn  w/sn  u,     dc  w  =  dn  u/cn  u. 

[Note.  Jacobi's  notation  for  the  functions  sn  u,  en  u,  dn  u  was  sinam  ?4,  cosam  u, 
Aam  M,  the  abbreviations  now  in  use  being  due  to  Gudermannt,  who  also  wrote  tn  m, 
as  an  abbreviation  for  tanamw,  in  place  of  what  is  now  written  sew. 

The  reason  for  Jacobi's  notation  was  that  he  regarded  the  inverse  of  the  integral 

u=  ["^  (1-Jc^ singer ^dd 
Jo 

as  fundamental,  and  wrote  J  <j)  =  a,vau;  he  also  wrote  Acji  =  {l—k^sin^(piy  for  ^  •] 

*  Example.     Obtain  the  following  results  ; 

Jo  J  csu 

Jo  J  dSM 

=  r    (i-«2)-i(i_p^2)-4^;     =r-  {fi-iy^{t^-py^dt 

J  cdu  J  (lc« 

=  r  {fi-iy^(t^-k^y^dt      =  l"'"(<2_i)-i(^'2^2+^2)-i^^ 

J  nsu  J  1 

(f^-iy^i-k'H'-y^dt. 


T. 


22'2.     The  addition-theorem  for  the  function  snu. 

We  shall  now  shew  how  to  express  sn  (u  +  v)  in  terms  of  the  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions  of  u  and  v ;  the  result  will  be  the  addition- theorem  for  the 
function  snw;  it  will  be  an  addition-theorem  in  the  strict  sense,  as  it  can 
be  written  in  the  form  of  an  algebraic  relation  connecting  sn  u,  sn  v,  sn  {u  +  v). 

*  Messenger  of  Mathematics,  xi.  p.  86. 

t  Crelle,  xviii.  pp.  12,  20. 

X  Fundamenta  Nova,  p.  30.     As  k-»-0,  am  «-»•(*. 


488  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  .  [CHAP.  XXII 

[There  are  numerous  methods  of  establishing  the  result;  the  one  given  is 
essentially  due  to  Euler*,  who  was  the  first  to  obtain  (in  1756,  1757)  the 
integral  of 

dx      dy  _  ,\ 

in  the  form  of  an  algebraic  relation  between  x  and  y,  when  X  denotes  a 
quartic  function  of  x  and  Y  is  the  same  quartic  function  of  y. 

Three  f  other  methods  are  given  as  examples,  at  the  end  of  this  section.] 

Suppose  that  u  and  v  vary  while  u  +  v  remains  constant  and  equal  to  a, 
say,  so  that 

dv  _ 
du 

Now  introduce,  as  new  variables,  Sj  and  s^  defined  by  the  equations 

Si  =  sn  u,     So  =  sn  V, 
so  that  J  .V  =  (1  -  SiO  (1  -  k%% 

and  42  ^  Q  _  g2^ (^i  _  ]^2g2-^^  sij^ce  v"  =  1. 

Differentiating  with  regard  to  u  and  dividing  by  2ii  and  24  respectively, 
we  find  that,  for  general  values  §  of  w  and  v, 

s,  =  -  (1  +  k"")  s^  +  2J<^s,\     s,  =  -  (1  +  I<f)  s^  +  2kW- 
Hence,  by  some  easy  algebra, 

S1S2  ^s^l  ^iC  ^1^2  \^1     —  ^2   ) 

s,'s^'  -  4V  ~  {s,'-Si'){l-k's,^s,')  ' 
and  so 

d  d 

{s,s,  -  s,s,)-^  ^  (siSo  -  .%s,)  =  (1  -  k's,%^)-'  du^'^~  k%'s/) ; 

on  integrating  this  equation  we  have 

i-        /»/  Si'S^ 

where  0  is  the  constant  of  integration. 

Replacing  the  expressions  on  the  left  by  their  values  in  terms  of  u  and  v 
we  get 

en  i<  dn  ?<  sn  v  +  en  w  dn  V  sn  M  _  „ 
1  —  A;^  sn-  u  sn-  v 

*  Acta  Petropolitana,  vi.  (1761),  pp.  37-57.     Euler  had  obtained  some  special  cases  of 
result  a  few  years  earlier. 

t  Another  method  is  given  by  Legeudre,  Fonctiom  EUiptiqucs,  i.   p.  20. 
X  For  brevity,  we  shall  denote  differential  coefficients  with  regard  to  u  by  dots,  thus 

._dv       .,_d^v 

§  I.e.  those  values  for  which  cnw  dn  ?(  and  cnv  Anv  do  not  vanish. 


22-2]  THE   JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  489 

That  is  to  say,  we  have  two  integrals  of  the  equation  du+  dv  =  0,  namely 
(i)  u  +  V  =  a  and  (ii) 

sn  M  en  i;  dn  v  +  sn  V  en  w  dn  w 


1  —  A;''  sn^  u  sn"^  v 


G, 


each  integral  involving  an  arbitrary  constant.  By  the  general  theory  of 
differential  equations  of  the  first  order,  these  integrals  cannot  be  functionally 
independent,  and  so 

sn  w  en  ■?;  dn  V  +  sn  V  en  M  dn  w 
1  —  k^  sn^  u  sn*  v 

is  expressible  as  a  function  of  w  +  v ;  call  this  function /(m  +  v). 

On  putting  V  =  0,  we  see  that  f(u)  =  sn  w ;  and  so  the  function  /  is  the 
sn  function. 

We  have  thus  demonstrated  the  result  that 

,         .      sn  w  en  V  dn  i;  +  sn  i;  en  w  dn  w 
sn  {u  +  v)  = -,      ;„ — -, z — ' 

which  is  the  addition-theorem. 

Using  an  obvious  notation*,  we  may  write 

an(„  +  ,,)  =  -j--^,^,^^-. 

'      Example  1.     Obtain  the  addition-theorem  for  sinw  by  using  the  results 

•     Example  2.     Prove  from  first  principles  that 

and  deduce  the  addition -theorem  for  sn  u.  (Abel.) 

*  Example  3.     Shew  that 


S^C^CL^  — S.^C^d]        CjC2-f  SjaiS2"2        »ia2  +  »«i  32^1^2 


(Cayley.) 


•    Example  4.     Obtain  the  addition-theorem  for  sn  u  from  the  results 

^1  (3/+^)  -94  {y-z)  ^2^3  =  ^t  {y)  Si  {y)  92  {z)  h  {z)+h  {y)  9,  {y)  9,  (z)  S^  (z\ 

^4  (y  +  z)Si(^-  Z)  Si'  =  V  (y)  54^  (Z)  -  Si2  (y)  3^2  (,)^ 

given  in  Chapter  xxi,  IVfiscellaneous  Examples  1  and  3  (pp.  480,  481).  (Jacobi.) 

.     Example  5.     Assuming  that  the  coordinates  of  any  point  on  the  curve 

/=(l-:*72)(i_p.^2) 

can  be  expressed  in  the  form  (sn  w,  en  u  dn  m),  obtain  the  addition-theorem  for  sn  u  by 
Abel's  method  (§  20-312). 

*  This  notation  is  due  to  Glaisher,  Messenger,  x.  pp.  92,  124. 


490  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP,  XXII 

[Consider  the  intersections  of  the  given  curve  with  the  variable  curve  2/--=l+mx+nx^  ; 
one  is  (0,  1) ;  let  the  others  have  parameters  u^,  u^,  %,  of  which  Ui,  u^  may  be  chosen 
arbitrarily  by  suitable  choice  of  m  and  n.  Shew  that  Ui  +  Ui+Us  is  constant,  by  the 
method  of  §  20-312,  and  deduce  that  this  constant  is  zero  by  taking 

m  =  0,     %=-A(l+F). 

Observe  also  that,  by  reason  of  the  relations 

{k^  -  %2)  x\  X2X3  =  2m,     {B  -  nF)  {X]^  +  ^2 + ^3)  =  2wi%, 
we  have 

.^3  (1  -l?'X^x^)=X3-{\-\-j^^A  2mXj^X2=Xs-2mXj^X2  -  nx^x^  {X1+X2+X3) 

==[xi+X2  +  Xs  —  nxi  x^  ^3)  —  (^1 + ^2)  -  2')nx-^  x^  -  nx^  x^ix^+x^ 
=  - *i  2^2  -  ■^23/1- ] 

22"21.     The  addition-theorems  for  an  u  and  &nu. 
We  shall  now  establish  the  results 

en  M  en  y  —  sn  u  sn  i;  dn  w  dn  w 
en  (u->rv)= = jz — I 1 , 

,     ,         .      dn  M  dn  V  —  A;-  sn  w  sn  w  en  w  en  y 

dn  {u  +  v)  = :. 7- — I 1 ; 

1  —  A;^  sn^  w  sn^  v 

the  most  simple  method  of  obtaining  them  is  from  the  formula  for  sn  {a  +  v). 

Using  the  notation  introduced  at  the  end  of  §  22*2,  we  have 

(1  -  k^s^^sif  cn^  {u  +  v)  =  {\-  ¥s^^siy  {1  -  sn^  {u  +  v)] 

=  (1  —  k-s-cs^^y  —  {s^c^dQ  +  s^Cid-^)" 

=  1  -  W-s^^s.^  +  k's.'s.^  -  Si"  (1  -  si)  (1  -  k'^s,'') 

-  si  (1  -  sr)  (1  -  k'^si)  -  2s,s.,c,c.Ad^ 

=  (1  -  si)  (1  -  si)  +  sisi  (1  -  k'si)  (1  -  k'si) 

—  Is-^s.^CiC^d^d^ 
=  (Cia2  —  s^Sod^d2y 

and  so  en  (u  +  v)=±  -fzTj^sisi    ' 

But  both  of  these  expressions  are  one-valued  functions  of  u,  analytic 
except  at  isolated  poles  and  zeros,  and  it  is  inconsistent  with  the  theory 
of  analytic  continuation  that  their  ratio  should  be  +  1  for  some  values  of  u, 
and  —  1  for  other  values,  so  the  ambiguous  sign  is  really  definite ;  putting 
w  =  0,  we  see  that  the  plus  sign  has  to  be  taken.  The  first  formula  is 
consequently  proved. 

The  formula  for  dn  (11  +  v)  follows  in  like  manner  from  the  identity 

(1  —  k'^sisi)'^  —  k-  (siC.do  +  6'oCirfi)- 

=  (1  -  k-si)  (1  -  k-si)  +  k'sisi  (1  -  si)  (1  -  s.i)  -  2k^SiSoCiC2d^d.i, 

the  proof  of  which  is  left  to  the  reader. 


22-21,    22-3]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  491 

I  Example  1.    Shew  that 

dn  (tt+ v)  dn  {u  -  «)  =  i_p^2g8  • 

(Jacobi.) 

[A  set  of  33  formulae  of  this  nature  connecting  functions  of  w  +  v  and  of  «  — v  is  given 
in  the  Fundamenta  Nova,  pp.  32-34.] 

,  Example  2,    Shew  that 

3  cntt  +  cn»  d  cnM  +  cnv 

du,  snwdni;  +  sni)dn«~  dv  snwdnv  +  sn  ydnw' 

so  that  (cntt  +  cnt;)/(snMdnv+sn  vdnw)  is  a  function  of  u-\-v  only  ;  and  deduce  that  it  is 
equal  to   {1  +  en  («  +  v)}/sn  {u  +  v). 

Obtain  a  corresponding  result  for  the  function  {siC2  +  S2C^i{di  +  d^. 

(Cayley.) 

•  Example  3.     Shew  that 

1  -k'^^i\^{u  +  v)sn^{u  —  v)  =  {\  -Fsn*M)  (1  -Fsn*v)  {\—]c^sn'^u^n^v)~'^, 
y?;'2  +  F  cn2  (m  +  v)  cn2  (tt  -  v)  =  (^'2  + /{;2  en*  «)  (^'2  +  F  en*  y)  ( 1  -  F  sn2  M  sn2  v)  -  2. 

(Jacobi  and  Glaisher.) 

•  Example  4.     Obtain  the  addition-theorems  for  cn(M+i;),  dn(M-l-v)  by  the  method  of 
§  22-2  example  4. 

•  Example  5.    Using  Glaisher's  abridged  notation  {Messenger,  x.  p.  105),  namely 

s,  c,  d=an  u,  en  u,  dn  u,    and    S,  C,  I)=sn  2u.  en  2u,  dn  2u, 
prove  that 

2scd  1-232  + Fa*  l-2Fg2+F3* 

''^~l-/&2s*'     ^~      l-Fs*      '  r^¥s*       ' 

(i+>S)^-(i->so^ 

^"(l+y?;-^)*-^!--?;,^)^* 
•      Example  6.     With  the  notation  of  example  5,  shew  that 


^  ~1+I>~k^l  +  C)~    k^{D-C)    ~kf^+D-k'^C' 

,_D^C _D  +  k'-C-k'^ ^k'^{\-D) _    k'^\  +  C) 
^~1+Z>~    P(l  +  (7)        Ic^lD-C)     k'^  +  D-BC 

k'^+I)+k^C_D+C_k'^l-C)_    k'\l  +  D) 


I+jD  l  +  C        D-C        k^+D-k'^C 


(Glaisher.) 


22-3.     The  constant  K. 
We  have  seen  that,  if 

.'0 
then  y  =  sn  {u,  k). 

If  we  take  the  upper  limit  to  be  unity  (the  path  of  integration  being 
a  straight  line)  it  is  customary  to  denote  the  value  of  the  integral  by  the 
symbol  K,  so  that  sn  (K,  k)=  1. 

[It  will  be  seen  in  §  22*302  that  this  definition  of  K  is  equivalent  to  the  definition  as 
i7r332  in  §21-61.] 


492  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

It  is  obvious  that  cnK  =  0  and  dnK=±k';  to  fix  the  ambiguity  in  sign, 
suppose  0  <  ^  <  1,  and  trace  the  change  in  (1  —k^t^)^  as  t  increases  from  0  to  1; 
since  this  expression  is  initially  unity  and  as  neither  of  its  branch  points  (at 
t  =  ±  k~^)  is  encountered,  the  final  value  of  the  expression  is  positive,  and  so 
it  is  +  A;' ;  and  therefore,  since  dn  ^  is  a  continuous  function  of  k,  its  value  is 
always  +  k'. 

The  elliptic  functions  of  K  are  thus  given  by  the  formulae 
sn^=l,     cn^  =  0,     dnJr  =  ^'. 

22*301.     The  expression  of  K  in  terms  of  k. 

In  the  integral  defining  K,  write  t  =  sin  <^,  and  we  have  at  once 

,47r 


K=  r   {1 -k""  sin' 4>)-^d(f). 

Jo 


When  I  A;  I  <  1,  the  integrand  may  be  expanded  in  a  series  of  powers  of  k, 
the  series  converging  uniformly  with  regard  to  (j>  (by  §  3"34,  since  sin-^  ^  ^  1) ; 
integrating  term-by-term  (|  4'7),  we  at  once  get 

K  =  ^'rrF{^^,  -;  1;  k-J=^7rF  (^^,  ^i   1;  cj, 

where  c  =  ¥.     By  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  this  result  holds  for- 
all  values  of  c  when  a  cut  is  made  from  1  to  +  oo  in  the    c-plane,  since 
both  the  integrand  and  the  hypergeometric  function  are  one-valued  and 
analytic  in  the  cut  plane. 
•    Example.     Shew  that 

^(^^"S)=^^'-  (Legendre.) 

22*302.     The  eqtdvalence  of  the  definitions  of  K. 

Taking  u  =  \iv^^  in  §21-61,  we  see  at  once  that  ^w{\Tr^-^)  =  \  and  so  GVi{^\Tr^^)  —  (d. 
Consequently,  1-snM  has  a  doable  zero  at  Jtt^s^.  Therefore,  since  the  number  of  poles 
of  sn«  in  the  cell  with  corners  0,  'inB^^  it  {j -{-l)  ^■i;  tt  (t-1)^3^  is  two,  it  follows  from 
§  20'13  that  the  only  zeros  of  l-snw  are  at  the  points  ^l  =  \^^  {'^m  +  l  +  ^nr)^^,  where 
m  and  n  are  integers.     Therefore,  with  the  definition  of  §  22-3, 

Now  take  r  to  be  a  pure  imaginary,  so  that  0<^<1,  and  K  is  real ;  and  we  have 
?i=0,  so  that 

^7r(4m  + 1)^32=  r''(l-Fsin2</))-^o?(^, 

where  m  is  a  positive  integer  or  zero  ;  it  is  obviously  not  a  negative  integer. 

If  m  is  a  positive  integer,  since  I    (1  -  F  sin^  0)    ^dc^  is  a  continuous  function  of  a  and 

J  0 
so  passes  through  all  values  between  0  and  K  as  a  increases  from  0  to  ^tt,  we  can  find 
a  value  of  a  less  than  W,  such  that 

^/(4m  + 1 )  =:  1 77  532  =  I    (1  -  F  sin2  0)  -  *  t/0  ; 
Jo 

and  so  sn  (1^77^32)  =  sin  a  <1, 

which  is  untrue,  since  sn  (iTr^32)  =  l. 


22-301-22-31]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  •     493 

Therefore  m  must  be  zero,  that  is  to  say  we  have 

But  both  K  and  ^nSs^  are  analytic  functions  of  k  when  the  c- plane  is  cut  from  1  to 
+  00,  and  so,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  this  result,  proved  when  0<^<1, 
persists  throughout  the  cut  plane. 

The  equivalence  of  the  definitions  of  K  has  therefore  been  established. 
•     Example  1.     By  considering  the  integral 

J  0 
shew  that  sn  2K=0. 

,     Example  2.     Prove  that 

sn^K={l+k'y^,     en  I  A'=  yf  *(!+>?;')"*,     du^K^k'K 

[Notice  that  when  u  =  ^K,  cq2ic  =  0.  The  sinrplest  way  of  determining  the  signs  to 
be  attached  to  the  various  radicals  is  to  make  ^"-^0,  k'-*-l,  and  then  snu,  cnu,  dnu 
degenerate  into  sin  ?<,  cosm,  1.] 

'     Example  3.     Prove,  by  means  of  the  theory  of  Theta-functions,  that 

cs^A'=dn^A'=^'i 

22*31.  The  periodic  properties  (associated  with  K)  of  the  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions. 

The  intimate  connexion  of  K  with  periodic  properties  of  the  functions 
sn  i(,  en  11,  dn  u,  which  may  be  anticipated  from  the  periodic  properties  of 

Theta-functions  associated  with  -tt,  will  now  be  demonstrated  directly  from 

the  addition-theorem. 

By  §  22'2,  we  have 

„,      snucnK dn  K  +  snK cnudnu        , 
'^(^  +  K)= l-k^sn^usn^K =  '^''- 

In  like  manner,  from  §  22"21, 

en  (u  +  K)  =  —  k'  sd  u,     dn  (u  +  -fiT)  =  k'  nd  u. 

TT  /        r.  rr\     ^n  {u  +K)         k'  sd  u 

Hence  sn  (u  +  2K)  =  ,') j-/.  =  —  r> — r-  =  —  sn  u, 

^  ^     dn{u+K)         kudu 

and,  similarly,   en  (w  +  2K)  =  —  en  w,      dn  (w  +  2K)  =  dn  u. 

Finally,         sn(w  +  4ir)  =  —  sn(«.  +  2/{')  =  snM,     c\\{it-\-^K)  =  cwu. 

Thus  4:K  is  a  period  of  each  of  the  functions  sn  il,  en  u,  tuJiile  dn  it  has 
the  smaller  per-iod  2K. 

•  Example  1.     Obtain  the  results 

sn  (?i  + A'')  =  cd«,     en  (u  +  K)=  —k'sdv,     dn{u  +  K)  =  k'ndu, 
directly  from  the  definitions  of  sn  u,  cu  u,  dn  u  as  quotients  of  Theta-functions. 
»  Example  2.     Show  that  cs  u  cs  (A  -u)  =  k'. 


494      •  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

22-32.     The  constant  K'. 
We  shall  denote  the  integral 

Wl-t^y'^il-k'H'y^dt 
Jo 

by  the  symbol  K',  so  that  K'  is  the  same  function  of  k'^  (=  c')  as  K  is  of 
k^  (=  c) ;  and  so 

when  the  c'-plane  is  cut  from  1  to  +  x ,  i.e.  when  the  c-plane  is  cut  from 

0  to  —  00  , 

To  shew  that  this  definition  of  K'  is  equivalent  to  the  definition  of  §  21-61,  we  observe 
that  if  tt'=  —  1,  -ff"  is  the  one-valued  function  of  k^,  in  the  cut  plane,  defined  by  the  equations 

£:=inS,^  (0  I  r),'    F  =  V  (0  I  r)-^3''  (0  I  r), 

while,  with  the  definition  of  §  21-51, 

K'  ^  |^^32  (0  I  r'),     k'-i  =  &2^  (0  I  r')  ^^3*  (0 1  r'), 

so  that  K'  must  be  the  same  function  of  ^'^  as  K  is  of  k'^ ;  and  this  is  consistent  with  the 
integral  definition  of  K'  as 

J  0 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  if  the  c-plane  be  cut  from  0  to  —  oo  and  from 

1  to  +  00  ,  then  in  the  cut  plane  K'  may  be  defined  by  the  equation 

K'=r    (s'-l)-i{l-k's')-ids. 

First  suppose  that  0<A;<1,  so  that  0<k'<l,  and  then  the  integrals 
concerned  are  real.     In  the  integral 

f    {l-t')-^{l-k'H')-^dt 
Jo 

make  the  substitution 

s  =  {l-k'H')-i, 

which  gives 

(s'  -  l)i  =  k't  (1  -  k'H')  -K     (1  -  f^'s')i  =  k'(l-  t')^  (1  -  k'H') '-  i, 

ds  _        ¥H 

'dt'il-k'H')^"'- 

it  being  understood  that  the  positive  value  of  each  radical  is  to  be  taken. 
On  substitution,  we  at  once  get  the  result  stated,  namely  that 

fl/k 

K'  =        (6*^  -  1)  -  4  (1  _  k's')  -  4  ds, 

provided  that  0<k<l;  the  result  has  next  to  be  extended  to  complex  values 
of  A;. 


22-32, 22-33]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  495 


Consider  T'^l  -  f') "  ^  (1  -k'^tT^dt, 

J  0 


the  path  of  integration  passing  above  the  point  1,  and  not  crossing  the  imaginary  axis*. 
The  path  may  be  taken  to  be  the  straight  lines  joining  0  to  1  -  8  and  1  +8  to  ^~i  together 
with  a  semicircle  of  (small)  radius  8  above  the  real  axis.  If  (1-^^)*  ^^(j  (i_Pf2)i 
reduce  to  +1  at  <=0  the  value  of  the  former  at  1  +8  is  e'^'^S*  (2  +  8)*=  -i{fi  -  1)*,  where 
each  radical  is  positive  ;  while  the  value  of  the  latter  at  t=l  is  4-^  when  k  is  real,  and 
hence  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation  it  is  always  +  k'. 

Make  8-^0,  and  the  integral  round  the  semicircle  tends  to  zero  like  8* ;  and  so 

P'*(l-«2)-i(l-F^2)-i^^_j^+J^^*(^2_l)-i(l_p^2)-i^^^ 
Now  P^*(l-f-')-*(l-F«2)-i^;=   r(y{;2_^42)-i(l_M2)-i^^^ 

which  t  is  analytic  throughout  the  cut  plane,  while  K  is  analytic  throughout  the  cut  plane. 
Hence  j^%t^-l)-i  (l-kH^^dt 

is  analytic  throughout  the  cut  plane,  and  as  it  is  equal  to  the  analytic  function  K'  when 
0</(;<l,  the  equality  persists  throughout  the  cut  plane ;  that  is  to  say 


K'=  r^^it^-iy^il-kH'T^dt, 


when  the  c-plane  is  cut  from  0  to  —  oo  and  from  1  to  +  co . 

rVk 
Since  K-\-iK'=        {l-t')-^^{l-kH')-^dt, 

Jo 

we  have  sn  {K  +  iK')^  Ijk,     dn  {K  +  iK')  =  0 ; 

while  the  value  of  cn{K  +  iK')  is  the  value  of  (1  —  t^)^  when  t  has  followed 
the  prescribed  path  to  the  point  l/k,  and  so  its  value  is  —  ik'/k,  not  +  ik'Jk. 

«   Example  1.     Shew  that 

lj\til-i){l-kH)}-Ut=lj^^^^Jt{t-l){&^t-l)}-idt=K, 

'    Example  2.     Shew  that  A"'  satisfies  the  same  linear  differential  equation  as  K  {^  22'301 
example). 

22'33.     The  periodic  propeHiesX  {associated  with  K  -¥  iK')  of  tlie  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions. 

If  we  make  use  of  the  three  equations 

sn  (K  +  iK')  =  k-\     en  {K  +  iK')  =  -  ik'/k,     dn  {K  +  iK')  =  0, 

*  li  (k)  >  0  because  ]  argc  |  <  tt. 

+  The  path  of  integration  passes  above  the  poiut  u  —  k. 

X  The   double   periodicity   of   sn  u   may  be   inferred   from   dynamical   considerations.     See 
Whittaker,  Analytical  Dynamics,  §  44. 


496 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XXII 


we  get  at  once,  from  the  addition-theorems  for  sn  u,  en  u,  dn  u,  the  following 
results : 

sn  u  en  (K  +  iK')  dn  {K  +  iK')  4-  sn  (iT  +  iK')  en  u  dn  w 


sn  (w  -\-K  +  iK')  = 
and  similarly 


1  -  P  sn''  u  ^li'  (K  +  iK') 
=  k~^  do  a, 

cn{u  +  K  +  iK')  =  —  ik'k~^  no  u, 
dn  {u  +  K  +  iK')  =  ik'  sc  u. 
By  repeated  applications  of  these  formulae  we  have 


'  sn  (i*  +  ^K  +  UK')  =  sn  u, 
en  (m  +  4ir  +  4iX')  =  en  u, 
dn  (w  +  4if  +  4tX')  =  dn  m. 


sn  (w  +  2ir  +  2iZ')  =  -  sn  it, 
en  (w  +  2Z  +  2ii5r')  =  en  u, 
dn  (t<  +  2ir  +  2iK')  =  -  dn  w, 

Hence  the  functions  sn  u  and  dn  w  have  period  4iK  +  4>iK',  while  en  u  has 
the  smaller  period  2K  +  2iK'. 

22*34.      The  periodic  properties  (associated  with  iK')  of  the  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions. 

By  the  addition-theorem  we  have 

sn  (ii  +  iK')  =  sn  (u  -  K+  K  +  iK') 

=  k-'dG(u-K) 

=  k~^  ns  u. 

Similarly  we  find  the  equations 

en  (a  +  iK')  =  —  ik~^  ds u, 

dn  ( w  -I-  iK')  =  —  ics u. 

By  repeated  applications  of  these  formulae  we  have 

'  sn  (u  +  2iK')  =     sn  u,      (  sn{u  +  UK')  =  sn  %, 

-  en  (w  -f  2iK')  =  —  en  u,     \  en  (it  -i-  UK')  =  en  u, 

dn{u-\- 2iK')  =  -  dn  ii,     [  dniu  +  UK')  =  dn u. 

Hence  the  functions  en  u  and  dn  w  have  period  UK',  while  snu  has  the 
smaller  period  2iK'. 

Example.     Obtain  the  formulae 

sn  (M-f2;nA'  +  2;w/i')  =  (  —  )"'snM, 
en  {u  +  2//1  A'+  2?ii  A'')  =:(-)'"  +  «  en  u, 
dn  ( «  +  2m  /i  +  iniK')  =  ( -  )"  dn  u. 

22'341.     The  behaviour  of  the  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  oiear  the  origin 
and  near  iK'. 

We  have 

d  d^ 

-.- sn  u  =  en u dn u,     -j-., sn  u  =  Uc^ sn^ u en  w dn u  —  Gwudnu (dn^ i<  -H ^■- cn^ u). 

an  du'  ^  ^ 


22-34-22-35]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  497 

Hence,  by  Maclaurin's  theorem,  we  have,  for  small  vahies  of  |  w  | , 

snu  =  u-^(l  +k^)u^  +  0  (u% 

on  using  the  fact  that  sn  u  is  an  odd  function. 
In  like  manner 

cnw  =  l-|w2^.o  (^^4)^ 

It  follows  that 

sn  (it  +  iK')  =  k~^  ns  w  " 

—  i      2}c^  —  1 
and  similarly  en  (u  +  iK')  =  -7^  H wr —  *w  +  0  (u^), 

i      2  —  A;^ 

dn  (u  +  iK')  = +  — ^ —  m  +  0  (v?). 

u         b 

It  follows  that  at  the  point  iK'  the  functions  sn  v,  en  v,  dn  v  have  simple 
poles  with  residues  k~^,  —  ik~^,  —  i  respectively. 

Example.  Obtain  the  residues  of  su  u,  en  u,  dn  u  at  iK'  by  the  theory  of  Theta- 
f unctions. 

22'35.     General  description  of  the  functions  sn  u,  en  11,  dn  u. 

The  foregoing  investigations  of  the  functions  sn  u,  en  u  and  dn  u  may  be 
summarised  in  the  following  terms : 

(I)  The  function  snu  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  u  with  periods 
4<K,  2iK'.  It  is  analytic  except  at  the  points  congruent  to  iK'  or  to  2K  +  iK' 
(mod.  4iK,  2iK') ;  these  points  are  simple  poles,  the  residues  ab  the  first  set  all 
being  k~^  and  the  residues  at  the  second  set  all  being  —  k~^ ;  and  the  function 
has  a  simple  zero  at  all  points  congruent  to  0  (mod.  2K,  2iK'). 

It  may  be  t)bserved  that  sn  u  is  the  only  function  of  u  satisfying  this  description ;  for 
if  0  {u)  were  another  such  function,  su  u  -  ^  («)  would  have  no  singularities  and  would  be 
a  doubly-periodic  function;  hence  (§  20"12)  it  would  be  a  constant,  and  this  constant 
vanishes,  as  may  be  seen  by  putting  u=0 ;  so  that  ^  («)  =  snM. 

When  0  <  A;^  <  1,  it  is  obvious  that  K  and  K'  are  real,  and  sn  u  is  real  for 
real  values  of  u  and  is  a  pure  imaginary  when  a  is  a  pure  imaginary. 

(II)  The  function  en  u  is  a  doubly -periodic  function  of  u  with  periods 
4/f  and  2K  +  2iK'.  It  is  analytic  except  at  points  congruent  to  iK'  or  to 
2K  +  iK'  (mod.  4^,  2K  -1-  2iK') ;  these  points  are  simple  poles,  the  residues 

w.  M.  A,  .S2 


498  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

at  the  first  set  being  —  ik~^,  and  the  residues  at  the  second  set  being  ik~^ ; 
and  the  function  has  a  simple  zero  at  all  points  congruent  to  ^  (mod,  2K,  2iK'). 
(Ill)  The  function  dn  u  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  u  with  periods 
2K  and  4iiK'.  It  is  analytic  except  at  points  congruent  to  iK^  or  to  SiK' 
(mod.  2K,  4)iK') ;  these  points  are  simple  poles,  the  residues  at  the  first  set 
being  —  i,  and  the  residues  at  the  second  set  being  i ;  and  the  function  has 
a  simple  zero  at  all  points  congruent  to  K  +  iK'  (mod.  2K,  2iK'). 

[To  see  that  the  functions  have  no  zeros  or  poles  other  than  those  just  specified, 
recourse  must  be  had  to  their  definitions  in  terms  of  Theta-fuuctions.] 

22*351.     The  connexion  between    Weierstrassian  and  Jacobian  elliptic  functions. 
If  gj,  62 >  H  be  any  three  distinct  numbers  whose  sum  is  zero,  and  if  we  write 

e, -e. 


i/  =  e2  + 


sn^  (X^,  k) ' 


we  have  ( ;7   )  =  ^  (cj  -  62)^  X'^  ns^  \u  cs^  \u  ds-  \u 

=  4  (<3i  -  62)^  ^^  ns^  \u  (ns^  \u-l)  (ns^  \u  -  P) 
=  4X2  (^1  -  62)  ~  Uy -  ^2)  iy-ei){y-  k"-  {e^  -  e^)  -  e^. 
Hence  \i^  =  e^  —  e-i  and  ^"^  =  (63  — 6'2)/(ej  — 62),  y  satisfies  the  equation* 


and  so  e^  +  (ei  -  e^)  ns^  ]  it  (ci  -  e.f,        f'^m^l  =  ^J  (?^+ a  ;  ^2,  5^3), 

I  V  ^1  — 62J 

where  o  is  a  constant.     Making  u  ->-  0,  we  see  that  a  is  a  period,  and  so 

i^  {^^ ;  9-2 ,  ffs)  =  62  +  (ei  -  62)  ns^  {«  (^i  -  e.^)^}, 

the  Jacobian  elliiitic  function  having  its  moduhis  given  by  the  equation 


F= 


63  —  62 


61  -  62 

22"4.     Jacobi's  irnaginai^y  transformation^. 

The  result  of  §  21  "51,  which  gave  a  transformation  from  Theta- functions 
with  parameter  t  to  Theta-functions  with  parameter  r  =  —  l/r,  naturally 
produces  a  transformation  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions ;  this  transformation 
is  expressed  by  the  equations 

sn  {iu,  k)  =  i  sc  {u,  k'),     en  {ia,  k)  =  nc  (u,  k'),     dn  {iu,  k)  =  dc  {u,  k'). 

Suppose,  for  simplicity,  that  0  <  c  <  1  and  y  >0;  let 

{l-t'-)--^(l-kH-)-^^dt  =  iu, 

J  0 

so  that  {y  =  sn  (iu,  k)  ; 

take  the  path  of  integration  to  be  a  straight  line,  and  we  have 

en  (ill,  k)  =  {l  +  y-f\     dn  (iu,  k)  =  (l  +  k^y^-)K 

*  The  values  of  g-^  and  ^3  are,  as  usual,  -|St'2e3  aud  ^eit'2e3. 

t  Fundameiita  Nocu,  pp.  34,  35.     Abel  {Crelle,  11.  p.  104)  derives  the  double  periodicity  of 
elliptic  functions  from  tliis  result.     Of.  Jacobi,   Werke,  i.  p.  402. 


22-351-22-41]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  499 

Now  put  y  =  7^I{1  —  rf)^,  where  0  <  ?;  <  1,  so  that  the  range  of  values 
of  t  is  from  0  to  i't)l{l  —  7f^)^,  and  hence,  if  t=-it-^l{\  —  t^^)^,  the  range  of 
values  of  ti  is  from  0  to  77, 

Then  dt  =  l{l-t^)-^idt„     {l-t"^)^  =  {l-t,^)-^, 

/  1  -  kH\  =  (1  -  k'H,^)  ^  *  (1  -  t,')  -  i 

and  we  have  iu  =  [\l  - 1^^) "  ^  (1  - k'Hy^) "  ^ idt^ , 

Jo 

so  that  17  =  sn  (w,  k') 

and  therefore  y  =  8c  {u,  k'). 

We  have  thus  obtained  the  result  that 
sn  {iu,  k)  =  i  sc  (u,  k'). 

Also      (in{iv,k)  =  {\-\-y'^)^  =  {l-r]'^)~^  =  nc{u,k'), 

and  dn  (tw,  A;)  =  (1  -/-  ¥y'')^  =  (1  -  A;'^'?')*  (1  -  '^')  "  *  =  dc  {u,  k'). 

Now  sn(m,  ^)  and  isc  {u,  k')  are  one-valued  functions  of  u  and  k  (in  the 
cut  c-plane)  with  isolated  poles.  Hence  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation 
the  results  proved  for  real  values  of  u  and  k  hold  for  general  complex  values 
of  u  and  k. 

22'41.  Proof  of  Jacobi's  imaginary  transformation  by  the  aid  of  Theta- 
functions. 

The  results  just  obtained  may  be  proved  very  simply  by  the  aid  of 
Theta-functions.     Thus,  from  §  21-61, 

where  ^  =  m/V(0|t), 

J         1,     e  oi  ei  /  •      7  \      ^3  (0  I  t')    —  ^"^1  {izT  I  r) 

and  so,  by  §21-61,       sn(»„,  ^)  =  ^ i- L ,^ .  ^-^^^' 

•  =  —  I  SC  {v,  k'), 

where  v  =  izT  ^3-  (0  |  t)  =  izr  .  (—  ir)  '^3^  (0  j  t)  =  —  m, 

so  that,  finally,  sn  {iu,  k)  =  i  sc  (u,  k'). 

•  Example  1.     Prove  that  en  (w,  X-)  =  nc  (?<,  k'),  dn  (m,  ^)=dc  (?*,  J(f)  by  the  aid  of  Theta- 
functions. 

Example  2.     Shew  that 

sn  i^iK',  k)  =i sc  {\K',  k')  =  tX-~*, 

en  {hiK\  k)  =  {\  ■{■kfk-^,      dn  {hJK',  k)  =  {\+kf-. 

[There  is  great  difficulty  in  determining  the  signs  of  sn^zA'',  cnii'/t',  dnii'A'',  if  any 
method  other  than  Jacobi's  transformation  is  used.] 

32—2 


500  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

•  Example  3.     Shew  that 

dnf  (A+zA  )=  j^ . 

•  Example  4.     UO<k<l  and  if  6  be  the  modular  angle,  shew  that 

sn  i  (A>iA')  =  ei"*'"^'V(cosec  ^),      en  ^  (^+iZ')  =  e"*"*'  V(cot  6), 

dn  I  (^+{^0  =  6-**''  V(coa^). 

(Glaisher.) 

22*42.     Landens  transformation*. 
We  shall  now  obtain  the  formula 

f ' (1  -  ytr  sin^ 0,)-^de^  =  {l+  k')  I   {1-t  sin^ d)'^ dO, 

Jo  .0 

where  sin  <^i  =  (1  +  A;')  sin  (/>  cos  </>  (1  —  Aj^sin^^)"^ 

and  k  =  (l-k')/(l  +  k'). 

This  formula,  of  which  Landen  was  the  discoverer,  may  be  expressed  by 
means  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  in  the  form 

sn  {(1  +  k')  u,  ki]  =  (1  +  k')  sn  (u,  k)  cd  (u,  k), 

on  writing  (f>  =  am  u,     ^i  =  am  Ui . 

To  obtain  this  result,  we  make  use  of  the  equation  of  §  21 '52,  namely 

^3  (z\t)%(z\t)  ^  %(z  \  t)%(z\t)  ^%(0\  t)  V(0|t) 
"^4(2^|2t)  ^7(2^  I  2t)     '  ^,(0|2t)      "" 

Write-f-  Ti=2t,  and  let  k^,  A,  A'  be  the  modulus  and  quarter-periods 
formed  with  parameter  Tj  ;   then  the  equation 

may  obviously  be  written 

k  sn  {2Kzl'Tr,  k)  cd  {2Kz/'7r,  k)  =  k,^  sn  (4AW7r,  k,)    (A). 

To  determine  k^  in  terms  of  k,  put  ^  =  t  tt,  and  we  immediately  get 

k/(l+k')^kK 
which  gives,  on  squaring,  k,  =  (1  -  k')/{l  +  k'),  as  stated  above. 

To  determine  A,  divide  equation  (A)  by  z,  and  then  make  z^O;  and 
we  get 

2Kk=4>kM, 
so  that  K=]^{l  +  k')K. 

*  Phil.  Trans,  i.xv.  (1775),  p.  285. 

t  It  will  be  supposed  that  |  li  (r)  ]  <  J,  to  avoid  difficulties  of  sign  which  arise  if  R  (ri)  does 
aot  lie  between  ±1.     This  condition  is  satisfied  when  0  <  /c  <  1,  for  r  is  then  a  pure  imaginary. 


22-42-22-5]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  501 

Hence,  writing  u  in  place  of  IKzlnr,  we  at  once  get  from  (A) 
(1  4-  k')  sn  {u,  k)  cd  {u,  A;)  =  sn  {(1  +  k')  u,  k^], 
since  ^lAzjir  =  2Au/K  =  (1  +k')u; 

so  that  Landen's  result  has  been  completely  proved. 

•  Example  1.     Shew  that  A'I\  =  2K'/K,  and  thence  that  A'  =  (l  +  ^)  K'. 

•  Example  2.     Shew  that 

en  {(1  +lf)  u,  k^}  =  {1  -  (1 4  k')  sn2  (u,  k)}  nd  (u,  k\ 
dn  {(1  +  k')  u,  ki)  =  (^'  +  (1  -  k')  cn^  {u,  k)]  nd  (m,  k). 

'  Example  3.     Shew  that 

dn{u,k)  =  i\-y)cn{{\+k')u,ki}  +  (l+k')din{{\-\-k')u,ki], 

where  k  =  '2k^^l{l-{-ki). 

22  •421.      Transform/itions  of  elliptic  functions. 

The  formula  of  Landen  is  a  particular  case  of  what  is  known  as  a  transformation 
of  elliptic  functions ;  a  transformation  consists  in  the  expression  of  elliptic  functions  with 
parameter  r  in  terms  of  those  with  parameter  (a  4- 6t-)/(c  +  <ir)  where  a,  b,  c,  d  are  integers. 
We  have  had  another  transformation  in  which  a=  —  1,  6=0,  c  =  0,  d—\,  namely  Jacobi's 
imaginary  transformation.  For  the  general  theory  of  transformations,  which  is  out- 
side the  range  of  this  book,  the  reader  is  referred  to  Jacobi,  Fundamenta  Nova,  to  Klein, 

Vorlesungen  uber   die  Theorie   der  Modulfunktionen  (edited   by  Fricke),  and  to  Cayley, 

Elliptic  Functions. 

*    Example.      By   considering   the   transformation  T2  =  r±l,    shew,   by   the   method   of 

§  22-42,  that 

sn  Qc'u,  k^  =  kf  sd  (m,  k), 

where  /^2=  ±ikjk',  and  the  upper  or  lower  sign  is  taken  according  as  R  {t) <0  or  R  {r)>0 ; 
and  obtain  formulae  for  en  {k'^l,,  ^2)  and  dn  {k'u,  k2). 

22"5.     Infinite  products  for  the  Jacobian  elliptic  functions*. 

The  products  for  the  Theta-functions,  obtained  in  §  21%3,  at  once  yield 
products  for  the  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  ;  writing  ti,  =  ^Kxlir,  we  obviously 
have,  from  §  22-11,  formulae  (A),  (B)  and  (C), 

^  4. ,  _  i   .        -^    f    1  -  2o2«  cos  ^x  4-  o"'*    ] 

^^^  =  2^*^^"*^^^\^ai-2r-cos2^4-r-r 

en  u  =  2qik'ik~^cosxh  |x  ^^^^^2^+ g^^n-j  ' 


4»1— 2 


,  ,1  ^    (14-  2o'2'»-i  cos  2x  4-  q 
M=i  (1  —  ^ff      cos  Ix  4-  q 

From  these  results  the  products  for  the  nine  reciprocals  and  quotients  can 

be  written  down. 

There  are  twenty-four  other  formulae  which  may  be  obtained  in  the  following  manner : 

From  the  duplication-formulae  (^  22 '21  example  5)  we  have 

1  —  en  ?<  1      ,1  1  4-  dn  ?i       ,1  1  dn  u  +  en  ?«  1,1 

=  sn  -21  dc  - 11,      =  as  -  w  nc  -  u,     =  en  -  «  ds  -  u. 

snw  2  2    '  sn?/.  2  2    '  su?t  2  2 

*  Fiiiidaiiienta  Nova,  pp.  84-115. 


502  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

Take  the  first  of  these,  and  use  the  products  for  an^u,  cn^u,  dn  ^m  ;  we  get 
1  — cn«      1  — cos^  "^    Q  — 2  ( -2')"cos^'  +  j2)i. 


snu  sin  .17     ^"1  U  +  2  (  — 3')"cos^+5'2"' ' 

on  combining  the  various  products. 

Write  u  +  K  for  u,  x+^rr  for  x,  and  we  have 

dn  M  +  ^'sn  M_  ] +sin;?7  °"    (l  +  2{  —  q)^sinx  +  q^"-''i 


en  u  cos  X    n=i  U  "~  2  ( —  3')"  si 

Writing  u  +  iK'  for  u  in  these  formulae  we  have 


"sin  .r  +  j-"'! 
"  sin  X  +  g'2"J  " 


km\u  +  idin.u  =  i  H 


1  +  2t  ( -  f  (f"-^  sin  g; -  g'^^ " ^ 
„=i  ll-2i(-r^''"*sin.r-j-'*-V' 

and  the  expression  for  kcdxi  +  ik'  i\du  is  obtained   by  writing  cos.^;  for   sin.r  in   this 
product. 

From  the  identities  {\  —  cnu){\+cnu)=.^n^u,  {ksnu  +  iAi\u){ksnu-iA\i'u)=.\^  etc., 
we  at  once  get  four  other  formulae,  making  eight  in  all ;  the  other  sixteen  follow  in  the 
same  way  from  the  expressions  for  ds\7ir\c\ii  and  cn^zids^M.  The  reader  may  obtain 
these  as  an  example,  noting  specially  the  following : 

.        .      »      r(l_o4n-3e2ta;)(X-o4»-le-2«\1 

<  Example  1.     Shew  that 


»=i  i(l-^V2'^-^)(l  +  ^^2'^-^)) 


*■    Example  2.      Deduce  from  example  1  and  from  §  22-41  example  4,  that,  if  6  be  the 
modular  angle,  then 


„=o  ii  +  (_)'^-y« 
and  thence,  by  taking  logarithms,  obtain  Jacobi's  result 

I ^  =  2  ( -  )'*  arc  tan  j'* "^ ^  =  arc  tan  >^q  —  arc  tan  ^q^  +  arc  tan  ^Jq^  —  •••, 

Jl=0 

'quae  inter  formulas  elegantissimas  censeri  debet.'    {Fund.  Nova,  p.  108.) 
Example  3.     By  expanding  each  term  in  the  equation 

logsn  ?(  =  log(2g'*)-ilog^  +  logsin.r+  2  {log  ( 1  -  ^'^^  e^":) 

n=l 
+  log  (1  -  j2,ig-2.x)  _  log  (1  _  ^2,1-1  ^iix^  _  log  (1  _  qin  -  lg-2ia;)| 

in  powers  of  e*"  '^,  and  rearranging  the  resultant  double  series,  shew  that 

1  1      ,  -.  4\     1  1      7     1        ■  '^'    2(7'"  cos  2mx 

logsn«  =  log(2j^)-ilog^'+logsmA'+   2    ^tj-,— ,.    , 

»t=i    ni\i.-^q  ) 

when  !  7(i)  I  <  \TrI{T). 

Obtain  similar  series  for  log  en  ?j,  logdnw. 

(Jacobi,  Ftmdamenta  Nova,  p.  99.) 
■    Example  4.     Deduce  from  example  3  that 

fK 

log  sn  u du  =  —^nK'  -  ^K log k. 

(Glaisher,  Proc.  Royal  Soc.  xxix.) 


2 26]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  503 

226.     Fourier  series  for  the  Jacohian  elliptic  functions*. 

If  M  =  ^Kxjir,  sn  u  is  an  odd  periodic  function  of  x  (with  period  27r),  which 
obviously  satisfies  Dirichlet's  conditions  (§9*22)  for  real  values  of  x;  and 
therefore  (§  9'31)  we  may  expand  sn  w  as  a  Fourier  sine-series  in  sines  of 
multiples  of  x,  thus 

00 

sn  w  =  S  hn  sin  nx, 

n=l 

the  expansion  being  valid  for  all  real  values  of  x.     It  is  easily  seen  that  the 
coefficients  hn  are  given  by  the  formula 

irihn  =  \      sn  w .  exp  (iiix)  dx. 

J     —77 

To  evaluate  this  integral,  consider  jsnu .  exp  (nix)  dx  taken  round  the 
parallelogram  whose  corners  are  —  tt,  tt,  ttt,  —  27r  +  ttt. 

From  the  periodic  properties  of  sn  u  and  exp  (nix),  we  see  that  I     cancels 

J  n 

;  and  so,  since  —  tt  +  -  ttt  and  ^  tt  are  the  only  poles  of  the  integrand 


/ 


—  2jr+TT 

{qua  function  oi  x)  inside  the  contour,  with  residues  f 

—  k~^  i-ir/Kj  exp  f  —  mV  +  ^  nTrir  j 

and  k~^  I ^  tt/Kj  exp  ( -  nTrir) 

respectively,  we  have 

-  )■  snu.exx)  (nix) dx^-yyjq^^  {I  -  (-)'"']. 

Writing  a;  —  tt  +  ttt  for  x  in  the  second  integral,  we  get 

|1  +  (_)n  ^n|  r     gn  u  .  exp  (nix)  dx  =  '^  g^"  {1  -  (-)«}. 

Hence,  when  n  is  even,  6„  =  0 ;  but  when  n  is  odd 

2.     q^ 
^"      Kkl-q^^' 
Consequently 

27r  iq^  sin  «      o^  sin  2,x      q^  sin  5a;         1 
Kk  (  1  —  g  1  -  (/■*  1-  q^  ) 

when  a;  is  real ;  but  the  right-hand  side  of  this  equation  is  analytic  when 
5^^"  exp  (ma?)  and  q^^  eyi^  (— nix)  both  tend  to  zero  as  ti-^x,  and  the  left- 
hand  side  is  analytic  except  at  the  poles  of  sn  u. 

*  These  results  are  substantially  due  to  Jacobi,  Werke,  i.  p.  157. 

t  The  factor  ^ttIK  has  to  be  inserted  because  we  are  dealing  with  sn  {2Kxlv). 


504  THE    TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

Hence  both  sides  are  analytic  in  the  strip  (in  the  plane  of  the  complex 
variable  x)  which  is  defined  by  the  inequality  |  /  (a-)  |  <  -  wl  (t). 

And  so,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  we  have  the  result 


sn  w  = 


27r    *   g"  +  *sin(2/i  +  l)a; 


Kk  nZ,  1  -  ?^+^ 

(where  u  =  IKxIir),  valid  throughout  the  strip  j  /  (a;)  |  <  ^  tt/  (t). 
Example  1.     Shew  that,  if  u  =  '2KxJit,  then 

/■«  -       -  °°    2tf"  sin  2n^ 

these  results  being  valid  when  \I {x)\<\nl {t). 

Example  2.     By  writing  x  +  \n  for  x  in  results  already  obtained,  shew  that,  if 

u-=2Kxl7r    and    \I{x)\<^7rI(r), 

27r   "^   (-)'*o"+*cos(2«  +  l)J-;         ,  27r     ^   (-)''o''+*sin(2?i+l)^ 

then       cd.=  ^.-^J^L^-L__ ,     sdu=^^,^l^y        \^^r-      '    , 

IT  27r    ■*    (  - )"  o"  cos  2/iA' 

"^^=2AT  +  ZF„!, iT?^^— • 

22*61.     Fourier  series  for  reciprocals  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions. 
In  the  result  of  §  22"6,  write  u  +  iK'  for  w  and  consequently  x  +  ^ttt  for  «; 
then  we  see  that,  if  0  >  /  (,r)  >  —  irl  (t), 

,        .„,,      27r   ^  a'''^*sin(27i+ l)(a;  +  i7rT) 

and  so  (§  22-34) 

74  =  0 

=:  (-  z'tt/A")  2  {2if"+'  sin  (2?i  +  1)  ^-  +  (1  -  g-^^-^)  e-<-'"+^'  ^^]/(l  -  f/"+i) 

That  is  to  say 

TT  27r   ^  0-"-+^  sin  (2n  +  1)  X 

2A  K  ,,%  1  -  r/»+i 

But,  apart   from  isolated  poles  at  the  points  x  =  nir,  each   side  of  this 
equation  is  an  analytic  function  of  x  in  the  strip  in  which 

ttI  (t)  >  I  (x)  >  -  TT  I  (t)  : 
— a  strip  double  the  width  of  that  in  which  the  equation  has  been  proved  to 
be  true  ;  and  so,  by  the  theory  of  analytic  continuation,  this  expansion  for 
ns  u  is  valid  throughout  the  wider  strip,  except  at  the  points  x  =  wtt. 


22-61,  22-7]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  505 

Example.  Obtain  the  following  expansions,  valid  throughout  the  strip  |  I{x)  \  <  rrI{T) 
except  at  the  poles  of  the  first  term  on  the  right-hand  sides  of  the  respective  expansions : 

J  TT  27r    *   o2»  +  isin(2«  +  l)^ 

ds«=  -^  cosec^-  ^  ^J/— T+^2r.-r--. 

TT         ,  27r    *    g^''iim2nx 

,77                     27r    »    (-)" o2"  + 1  COS  (2n+ 1)07 
dcu=  ^  secx    +  ^  „!/-    \_^Ji ^. 

IT                     27r   *    (-)"o2»  +  icos(2n-f-l)a;' 
ncM=--^^secA'     -7^772    ^ — ^    1  .-  9n+i > 

IT     ^                 27r    «    ( - )"  o^™  sin  2n^ 
sc  w=  — ^i^  tan  ^    +  -ftt;  2    ^^ — —,—  ,v • 

22*7.     Elliptic  integrals. 

An  integral  of  the  form  IR(w,  x)  dx,  where  R  denotes  a  rational  function 

of  w  and  x,  and  w"^  is  a  quartic,  or  cubic  function  of  x  (without  repeated 
factors),  is  called  an  elliptic  integral*. 

[Note.  Elliptic  integrals  are  of  considerable  historical  importance,  owing  to  the  fact 
that  a  very  large  number  of  important  properties  of  such  integrals  were  discovered  by 
Euler  and  Legendre  before  it  was  realised  that  the  inverses  of  certain  standard  types  of 
such  integrals,  rather  than  the  integrals  themselves,  should  be  regarded  as  fundamental 
functions  of  analysis. 

The  first  mathematician  to  deal  with  elliptic  functions  as  opjiosed  to  elliptic  integrals 
was  Gauss  (see  §  22-8),  but  the  first  results  published  were  by  Abelt  and  Jacobi  J. 

The  results  obtained  by  Abel  were  brought  to  the  notice  of  Legendre  by  Jacobi 
immediately  after  the  publication  by  Legendre  of  the  Traite  des  fonctions  elliptiques.  In 
the  supplement  (tome  in.  p.  1),  Legendre  comments  on  their  discoveries  in  the  following 
terms  :  "A  peine  mon  ouvrage  avait-il  vu  le  jour,  a  peine  son  titre  pouvait-il  gtre  connu 
des  savans  etrangers,  que  j'appris,  avec  autant  d'etonneinent  que  de  satisfaction,  que  deux 
jeunes  geomfetres,  MM.  Jacobi  (C.-G.-J.)  de  Koenigsberg  et  Ahel  de  Christiania,  avaient 
r^ussi,  par  leurs  travaux  particuliers,  k  perfectionner  considerablement  la  theorie  des 
fonctions  elli^Jtiques  dans  ses  points  les  plus  elev^s." 

An  interesting  correspondence  between  Legendre  and  Jacobi  was  printed  in  Grelle,  Lxxx. 
(1875),  pp.  205-279  ;  in  one  of  the  letters  Legendre  refers  to  the  claim  of  Gauss  to  have 
made  in  1809  many  of  the  discoveries  published  by  Jacobi  and  Abel.  The  validity  of 
this  claim  was  established  by  Sobering  (see  Gauss,  Werke,  in.  pp.  493,  494),  though  the 
researches  of  Gauss  (  Werke,  in.  pp.  404-460)  remained  unpublished  until  after  his  death.] 

We  shall  now  give  a  brief  outline  of  the  important  theorem  that  every 
elliptic  integral  can  be  evaluated  by  the  aid  of  Theta-functions,  combined 

*  Strictly  speaking,  it  is  ouly  called  an  elliptic  integral  when  it  cannot  be  integrated  by 
means  of  the  elementary  functions,  and  consequently  involves  one  of  the  three  kinds  of  elliptic 
integrals  introduced  in  §  22-72. 

t  Crelle,  n.  pp.  101-19G. 

:J:  Jacobi  announced  his  discovery  in  two  letters  (dated  June  13,  1827  and  August  2,  1827) 
to  Schumacher,  who  published  extracts  from  them  in  Astronomische  Nach.  vi.  (No.  123)  in 
September  1827— the  month  in  which  Abel's  memoir  appeared. 


506  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

with  the  elementary  functions  of  analysis ;  it  has  already  been  seen  (§  20*6) 

that  this  process  can  be  carried  out  in  the  special  case  of  jw~^dcc,  since 

the   Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions  can  easily  be  expressed   in   terms   of 
Theta-functions  and  their  derivates  (§  21 '73). 

[The  most  important  case  practically  is  that  in  which  ^  is  a  real  function  of  x  and  w, 
which  are  themselves  real  on  the  path  of  integration ;  it  will  be  shewn  how,  in  such 
circumstances,  the  integral  may  be  expressed  in  a  real  form.] 

Since  R  (w,  x)  is  a  rational  function  of  w  and  x  we  may  write 
R  (w,  x)  =  F  (w,  x)IQ  {w,  x), 
where  P  and  Q  denote  polynomials  in  w  and  x ;  then  we  have 

w(4  {W,  X)  (j/  (—  W,  X) 

Now  Q  (w,  x)  Q  (—  w,  x)  is  a  rational  function  of  w^  and  x,  since  it  is 
unaffected  by  changing  the  sign  of  iv ;  it  is  therefore  expressible  as  a 
rational  function  of  x. 

If  now  we  multiply  out  wP  (tu,  x)  Q  (—  w,  x)  and  substitute  for  w^  in  terms 
of  X  wherever  it  occurs  in  the  expression,  we  ultimately  reduce  it  to  a  poly- 
nomial in  X  and  w,  the  pol3momial  being  linear  in  w.  We  thus  have  an 
identity  of  the  form 

R  {w,  x)  =  {Ri  (x)  +  wR^  (x)]/w, 

by  reason  of  the  expression  for  lu^  as  a  quartic  in  x ;  where  R^  and  R^  denote 
rational  functions  of  x. 


Now  lR2{x)dx  can  be  evaluated  by  means  of  elementary  functions  onl}^*  ; 

so  the  problem  is  reduced  to  that  of  evaluating  I  w~^  R^  (x)  dx.     To  carry  out 

this  process  it  is  necessary  to  obtain  a  canonical  expression  for  w^,  which  we 
now  proceed  to  do. 

22'71.     27te  expression  of  a  quartic  as  the  product  of  sums  of  squares. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  any  quartic  (or  cubicf)  in  x  (with  no  repeated 
factors)  can  he  expressed  in  the  form 

[A,(x-  ay  +  B,  (x  -  (3f}  [A,  (x  -  af  +  B,  (x  -  /3)^|, 

where,  if  the  coefficients  in  the  quartic  are  real,  A-^,  B^,  A^,  B.2,  oc,  ^  are  all 
real. 

*  The  integration  of  rational  functions  of  one  variable  is  discussed  in  text-books  on  Integral 
CalcuUis. 

t  In  the  following  analysis,  a  cubic  may  be  regarded  as  a  quartic  in  which  the  coefficient  of 
.r''  vanishes. 


2271,  2272]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  507 

To  obtain  this  result,  we  observe  that  any  quartic  can  be  expressed  in 
the  form  SiS^  where  ^i,  S<i  are  quadratic  in  x,  say* 

/Si  =  OriX^  +  2biOC  +  Ci,     82=  a.2*"^  +  '^h^  +  ^2- 

Now,  \  being  a  constant,  S^  —  XS^  will  be  a  perfect  square  in  x  if 

(tti  -  XOa)  (Ci  -  XC2)  -  (bi  -  Xh-if  =  0. 

Let  the  roots  of  this  equation  be  Xj,  X^;  then,  by  hypothesis,  numbers 
a,  y9  exist  such  that 

Si  —  XiSi  =  (o-i  —  Xi  tta)  (x  —  ay,     Si  —  Xg'S'a  =  («!  —  ^2  a^)  (x  —  I3f ; 

on  solving  these  as  equations  in  S-^,  S.2,  we  obviously  get  results  of  the  form 

Si  =  Ai(x-ay  +  B,{x-0r,     S,~  A,(x-ay+B,(x-^y, 

and  the  required  reduction  of  the  quartic  has  been  effected. 

[Note.      If  the  quartic  is  real  and  has  two  or  four  complex  factors,  let  Si  have  com- 
plex factors  ;   then  X^  and  Xo  are  real  and  distinct  since 

(«!  -  Xa2)  (ci  -  XC2)  -  (5i  -  Xb^y 

is  positive  when  X  =  0  and  negative t  when  X  —  aija^. 

When  S\  and  S2  have  real  factors,  say  {x  —  ^\)  {x  -  ^{),  (^"i?  — 12)  (■^  -  |2')j  the  condition 
that  Xi  and  X2  should  be  real  is  easily  found  to  be 

(^l-^2)(^l'-^2)(6-|2')(^l'-6')>0, 

a  condition  which  is  satisfied  when  the  zeros  of  ^1  and  those  of  *S^2  do  not  interlace ;  this 
was,  of  course,  the  reason  for  choosing  the  factors  *S^i  and  S^  of  the  quartic  in  such  a  way 
that  their  zeros  do  not  interlace.] 

2212.     The  three  kinds  of  elliptic  integrals. 

Let  a,  yS  be  determined  by  the  rule  just  obtained  in  §  22'7l,  and,  in  the 

integral  \w~^Ri  (x)dx,  take  a  new  variable  t  defined  by  the  equation  J 

t  =  (x  —  a)/{x  —  y8) ; 

,,       ,  dx  (a—0)~'^dt 

we  then  have  —  =  + 


w  [(Aif+Bi)(A,t'  +  B,)]i' 

*  If  the  coefficients  in  the  quartic  are  real,  the  factorisation  can  be  carried  out  so  that  the 
coefficients  in  Si  and  S2  are  real.  In  the  special  case  of  the  quartic  having  four  real  linear 
factors,  these  factors  should  be  associated  in  pairs  (to  give  Si  and  S^)  in  such  a  way  that  the 
roots  of  one  pair  do  not  interlace  the  roots  of  the  other  pair  ;  the  reason  for  this  will  be  seen  in 
the  note  at  the  end  of  the  section. 

t  Unless  ai  :  a2=bi  :  1)2,  in  which  case 

Si  =  ai  {x-a)^  +  Bi,     S2  =  a2(x-  a)'^  +  B2. 

J  It  is  rather  remarkable  that  Jacobi  did  not  realise  the  existence  of  this  homograpliic 
substitution  ;  in  his  reduction  he  employed  a  quadratic  substitution,  equivalent  to  the  result  of 
applying  a  Landen  transformation  to  the  elliptic  functions  which  we  shall  introduce. 


508  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL    FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

If  we  write  R^  (x)  in  the  form  +  (a  —  /3)  R3  (t),  where  R3  is  rational,  we  get 
rR,(x)dx_  r  R3(t)dt 

.  •''       w       ~  J  {{A,t'  +  B,)iA,f~  +  B,p' 

Now       R,  (t)  +  i^3  (-  0  =  2  R,  (t%     R3{t)-R3{-t)  =  2tR,  (t% 
where  JK4  and  Rg  are  rational  functions  of  t^,  and  so 

R3{t)=R,(t')  +  tR,(t'). 

But  l{(A^t'  +  B,)(A,t'  +  B,)}-^tR,{t'')dt 

can  be  evaluated  in  terms  of  elementary  functions  by  taking  t^  as  a  new 
variable*;   so  that,  if  we  put  R^it^)  into  partial  fractions,  the  problem  of 


integrating  \R(w,  x)dx  has  been  reduced  to  the  integration  of  integrals  of 
the  following  types 

{f^  [{A,t'  +  B,)  (A,t'  +  B,)]  -  *  dt, 


/^ 


in  the  former  of  these  m  is  an  integer,  in  the  latter  m  is  a  positive  integer 
and  i\^^0. 

By  differentiating  expressions  of  the  form 

it   is   easy   to    obtain   reduction    formulae   by  means  of  which    the  above 
integrals  can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  one  of  the  three  canonical  forms : 

(i)    [K^i^2  +  5,)(^.f^  +  5,)}-*c;^, 

(ii)      \t''[{A,t''  +  B,)(^AJ?^B.X^^^^ 

(iii)    |(1  +  Ni?)-^  K^it^  +  B,)  {A,t'  +  B,)]  -^t. 

These  integrals  were  called  by  Legendref  elliptic  integrals  of  the  first, 
second  and  third  kinds,  respectively. 

The  elliptic  integral  of  the  first  kind  presents  no  difficulty,  as  it  can  be 
integrated  at  once  by  a  substitution  based  on  the  integral  formulae  of 
§§  22121,  22-122;  thus,  if  A„  B„  A^,  B^  are  all  positive  and  A^B,>A,B^, 
we  write 

A,h  =  B,^  cs  (u,  k).         [k'-'  =  (A,B,)/(A,B,).] 

*  See,  e.g..  Hardy,  Integration  of  Functions  of  a  ungle  Variable  (Camb.  Math.  Tracts,  No.  2). 
t  Exercices  de  Calcul  Integral,  i.  p.  19. 


22-72] 


THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS 


509 


'Example  1,  Verify  that,  in  the  case  of  real  integrals,  the  following  scheme  gives 
all  possible  essentially  different  arrangements  of  sign,  and  determine  the  appropriate 
substitutions  necessary  to  evaluate  the  corresponding  integrals. 


^ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

- 

Bi 

+ 

+ 

- 

- 

+ 

^2 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

+ 

A 

+ 

+ 

+ 

- 

+ 

Example  2.     Shew  that 
'sn  udu  = 


1—kcdu 


\snudu=  zrr  log  ^ — '-,     ,     , 
J  2k     ^1+kcd^i' 


I  en  udu  =  k   1 


arc  tan  {k  sd  u), 


dnudu  =  iixn  u, 
I  ds  udu 


f         ,        1  ,      dnu  +  kf 
jscudu=-^,log^^^^^,, 


1  ,      1  -  en  M 

2  ''i  +  cn%' 


ldcudu=-  log  — 


1  +  snw 
anu' 


and  obtain  six  similar  formulae  by  writing  u  +  K  for  u. 


(Glaisher.) 


t Example  3.      Prove,   by  differentiation,   the   equivalence    of    the   following    twelve 
expressions : 

k"^u-\-k'^  lev?  udu, 

u  —  dnucsu  —  \  ns^  udu, 

P  sn  ucdu-\-  k'^  Jnd^  udu, 

k'^  u  ■{- k^  s>n  u  ad  u  +  k^kf^\s,d^  udu, 

—  dnwcs  u  —  \c&^udu, 

M -f  dn  M  sc  ?( -  Jdc^  ttc?M. 


u—k^la\\^itdu, 

Idn^udu, 

k"^u  +  dnuficu  —  ^'-  jnc^  udu, 

duuacu  —  k"^  Jsc^  u  du, 

u+k'^smi  cd  u  —  k^  I  cd^  u  du, 

k'^u  —  dnucau  —  Jds^  u  du. 

Example  4.     Shew  that 
d^  sn"  ^(, 


du^ 


—n{n  —  \)  sn"~2  u  —  ii^  {\-\-k'^)  sn"M  +  /i  (n  +  1)  ^^sn""''^  ^^^ 


and  obtain  eleven  similar  formulae  for  the  second  differential  coefficients  of  en"  u, 
dn"  u,  ...  nd"  u.  What  is  the  connexion  between  these  formulae  and  the  reduction 
formula  for  lt'<'{{Ait-  + B{)  {A2t^  + D^)}'^ dt^i 

(Jacobi ;  and  Glaisher,  Messenger,  xi.) 

>  Exam,ple  5.     By  means  of  §  20"6  shew  that,  if  a  and  ^  are  positive, 

{\j,{d'-x'^){x^+^^)}-Ux=r{As^-g2S-g^)~Us, 

where  ej  is  the  real  root  of  the  cubic  and 

and  prove  that,  if  5*2  =  0,  then  a  and  /3  are  given  by  the  equations 
a2-^2=  -  3  (2^3)*,     a2  +  i32  =  2  V3  •  |  25-3  |*. 


510  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

Example  6.     Deduce  from  example  5,  combined  with  the  integral  formula  for  en  u, 
that,  if  ^3  is  positive, 

f    {A^-g^)'^ds  =  ^{a^->r0^)-^K,  f       (A^+g^y^  ds  =  2  {a^+^^y^  K', 

J  ^1  J  —ei 

where  a-  =  (v/3-f)  (2^3)*,  ^2=,(^3  +  |)(2^3)*,  and  the  modulus  is  a{a^+^'^y^. 

22"73.     The  elliptic  integral  of  the  second  kind.     The  function*  E  (u). 
To  reduce  an  integral  of  the  type 

ft^  {(A,t'  +  B,)  (A.t'  +  B,)}  -^dt, 


> 


we  employ  the  same  elliptic  function  substitution  as  in  the  case  of  that 
elliptic  integral  of  the  first  kind  which  has  the  same  expression  under  the 
radical.     We  are  thus  led  to  one  of  the  twelve  integrals 


1  sn^wdw,        I  cn^ udu,  ...  1  nd^ udu. 


By  §  22'72  example  3,  these  are  all  expressible  in  terms  of  u,  elliptic 
functions  of  u  and  jdn-udu;  it  is  convenient  to  regard 

ru 

E  (u)  =  /    dn^  11  du 
Jo 

as  the  fundamental  elliptic  integral  of  the  second  kind,  in  terms  of  which  all 

others  can  be  expressed ;  when  the  modulus  has  to  be  emphasized,  we  write 

E  (u,  k)  in  place  of  E{u). 

We  observe  that 

dE(u)      ,  .,  „,-,      ^ 

— ^-^  =  dn-  u,         E(0)  =  0. 
du 

Further,  since  dn-  u  is  an  even  function  with  double  poles  at  the  points 
ImK  +  (2n  + 1)  iK,  the  residue  at  each  pole  being  zero,  it  is  easy  to  see  that 
E  (ii)  is  an  odd  one-valued  f  function  of  u  with  simple  poles  at  the  poles 
of  dnu. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  E  {u)  may  be  expressed  in  terms  of  Theta- 
functions ;  the  most  convenient  type  to  employ  is  the  function  0  {u). 


Consider  -^  1r^/  tI" 

du  (B(u)j 


du  \^{u)]  ' 

it  is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  n  with  double  poles  at  the  zeros  of  0  {u), 
i.e.  at  the  poles  of  dn  u,  and  so,  if  J.  be  a  suitably  chosen  constant, 

,  .       ,  d  m'{u)) 

an-  u  —  A  -^  \  -rrr\  \ 
du  [0(w)j 

*  This  notation  was  introduced  by  Jacobi,  Crelle,  iv.  p.  373.  In  the  Fiindavienta  Nova,  he 
writes  E  (am  11)  where  we  write  E  (u). 

t  Since  the  residues  of  dn^  u  are  zero,  the  integral  defining  E  (u)  is  independent  of  the  path 
chosen  (§  6-1). 


22-73-22-732]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  511 

is  a  doubly-periodic  function  of  u,  with  periods  2K,  2iK',  with  only  a  single 
simple  pole  in  any  cell.  It  is  therefore  a  constant ;  this  constant  is  usually 
written  in  the  form  E/K.  To  determine  the  constant  A,  we  observe  that 
the  principal  part  of  dn^u  at  iK'  is  —{u  —  iK')~%  by  §  22-341;  and  the 
residue   of    0'  (u,)/^  (u)   at    this   pole   is    unity,   so    the   principal   part   of 

^  \^rl\  is  -  («  -  iK'r\     Hence  A  =  l,  so 

du  [©(w)j      K 
Integrating  and  observing  that  ©'  (0)  =  0,  we  get 
E{u)  =  0'  {u)l%  (u)  +  uE/K. 

Since  @'{K)  =  0,  we  have  E{K)  =  E\  hence 

E  =  \^  dn^udu  =  [^"(l  -  k^  sin^  <^)^  d(^  =  \'Tr  F  {-\,\;  1;  k^Y 

It  is  usual  (cf  §  22'3)  to  call  K  and  E  the  complete  elliptic  integrals  of  the 
first  and  second  kinds.  Tables  of  them  qua  functions  of  the  modular  angle 
are  given  by  Legendre,  Fonctions  Elliptiques,  t.  ii. 

•    Example  1.     Shew  that  E{u  +  2nK)  =  £{u)  +  2nE,  where  n  is  any  integer. 

•  Example  2.     By  expressing  6  (u)  in  terras  of  the  function  .^4  {^ttu/K),  and  expanding 
about  the  point  ^c=^iK',  shew  that 

E=i{2-k^—srKh'^i')}£:- 

22-731.     The  Zeta-function  Z  {u). 

The  function  E  (u)  is  not  periodic  in  either  2K  or  in  2iK',  but,  associated 
with  these  periods,  it  has  additive  constants  2E,  [2iK'E  —  7ri\/K ;  it  is 
convenient  to  have  a  function  of  the  same  general  type  as  E{u)  which  is 
singly-periodic,  and  such  a  function  is 

Z  (u)  =  0'  (u)/@  (u); 
from  this  definition,  we  have* 

Z  (w)  =  E  (a)  -  uE/K,         0  (u)  =  0  (0)  exp  j  T Z  (t)  dti . 

22-732.     The  addition-formulae  for  E  (u)  and  Z  (u). 
Consider  the  expression 

--— f  —  ^  ;  -   —  ^  ,-r  +  k-  snu  snv  sn(u  +  v) 

(»){u  +  v)      0(u)       0(v)  V    -r    y 

*  The  integral  in  the  expression  for  0  («)  is  not  one-valued  as  Z  (t)  has  residue  1  at  its  poles; 
but  the  difference  of  the  integrals  taken  along  any  two  paths  with  the  same  end  points  is  2«7ri 
where  n  is  the  number  of  poles  enclosed,  and  the  exponential  of  the  integral  is  therefore  one- 
valued,  as  it  should  be,  since  9  (u)  is  one-valued. 


512  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

qua  function  oi  u.  It  is  doubly-periodic*  (periods  2K  and  liK')  with  simple 
poles  congruent  to  iK'  and  to  iK'  —  v ;  the  residue  of  the  first  two  terms  at 
iK'  is  —  1,  and  the  residue  of  sn  w  sn  ?;  sn  {u  +  ?;)  is  k~^  sn  v  sn  {iK'  -\-  v)  =  k~\ 

Hence  the  function  is  doubly-periodic  and  has  no  poles  at  points 
congi'uent  to  iK'  or  (similarly)  at  points  congruent  to  iK'  —  v.  By 
Liouville's  theorem,  it  is  therefore  a  constant,  and,  putting  u  =  0,  we  see 
that  the  constant  is  zero. 

Hence  we  have  the  addition-formulae 

Z  (u)  +  Z  (v)  —  Z  (u  +  v)  =  k^  sn  u  sn  v  sn  (u  +  v), 

E (u)  +  E (v)  —  E (u  +  v)  =  k^  snu  sn  V  sn  (u  +  v). 

[Note.  Since  Z  (u)  and  £  («)  are  not  doubly-periodic,  it  is  possible  to  prove  that  no 
algebraic  relation  can  exist  connecting  them  with  sn  w,  en  m  and  dn  «,  so  these  are  not 
addition-theorems  in  the  strict  senset.] 

22"733.     Jacobi's  imaginary  transformationl  of  Z  (u). 

From  §  21 '51  it  is  fairly  evident  that  there  must  be  a  transformation  of 
Jacobi's  type  for  the  function  Z  (u).     To  obtain  it,  we  translate  the  formula 

^2  (i^  I  t)  =  (—  ^"''")^  exp  (—  irx^jir) .  ^4  {ixr  \  t') 
into  Jacobi's  earlier  notation,  when  it  becomes 


H  (iu  +  K,  k)  =  (-  It)^  exp  (  t-^^t?-,  )  B  (u,  k'), 


TTU 

.iKK' 

and  hence 

cn  i^u,  k)  =  (-  ^rf  exp  (^^, j  ^^J^  ^  ^^-^ . 

Taking  the  logarithmic  differential  of  each  side,  we  get,  on  making  use  of 
§  22-4, 

Z  (iu,  k)  =  i  dn  (u,  k')  sc  {u,  k')  —  ^Z  {u,  k')  —  ■Triul{2KK'). 

22"734.     Jacobi's  imaginary  transformation  of  E (u). 

It  is  convenient  to  obtain  the  transformation  of  ^(w)  directly  from  the 
integral  definition  ;  we  have 

E{iu,  k)=  jdn^{t,  k)dt=  \    dn^{it',  k)idt' 

Jo  J  a 

=  i[  dc^  (f,  k')  dt', 

J  0 

on  writing  t  =  it'  and  making  use  of  §  22*4. 

*  2/A"  is  a  period  since  the  additive  constauts  for  the  first  two  terms  cancel. 

+  A  theorem  due  to  Weierstrass  states  that  an  analytic  function,/ (2;),  possessing  an  addition- 
theorem  iu  the  strict  i^ense  must  be  either 

(i)      an  algebraic  function  of  z, 
or  (ii)     an  algebraic  function  of  exp  (irizju), 

or  (iii)     an  algebraic  function  of  ^  (2  i  co] ,  ^2); 

where  w,  wj,  wq  are  suitably  chosen  constants.     See  Forsyth,  Tlieori/  of  Functions,  Chap.  xiii. 

X  Fnndainenta  Nova,  p.  IGl. 


22-733-22-735]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  513 

Hence,  from  §  2272  example  3,  we  have 

E (lu,  k)  =  i  \u  +  dn  {a,  k')  sc  {u,  k')  -  I  "dn^  (tf,  k')  dt\  , 

and  so  E{iu,  k)  =  iu  +  i  dn  (w,  k')  sc  (a,  k')  —  iE  (u,  k'). 

This  is  the  transformation  stated. 

It  is  convenient  to  write  E'  to  denote  the  same  function  of  k'  as  E  is  of  k, 
i.e.E'=E(K',k'),sothat 

E(2iK',k)  =  2i(K'-E'). 

22'735.     Legendre's  relation*. 

From  the  transformations  of  E{u)  and  Z{u)  just  obtained,  it  is  possible 
to  derive  a  remarkable  relation  connecting  the  two  kinds  of  complete  elliptic 
integrals,  namely 

EK'  +  E'K-KK'^lir. 

For  we  have,  by  the  transformations  of  §§  22*733,  22*734, 

E  (iu,  k)-Z  (iu,  k)  =  iu  -  i  [E  {u,  k')  -  Z  {u,  k')]  +  triuJi^KK'), 

and  on  making  use  of  the  connexion   between  the  functions  E{u,  k)  and 
Z  (w,  k),  this  gives 

iuEIK  =  iu  -  i  [uE'jK']  +  7riu/{2KK'). 

Since  we  may  take  u=^0,  the  result  stated  follows  at  once  from  this 
equation;  it  is  the  analogue  of  the  relation  ^Wg  — 772<«^i  =  0'""*  which  arose  in 
the  Weierstrassian  theory  (§  20*41 1). 

Example  1.     Shew  that 

E{u  +  K)  —  E{u)  =  E—k^snucdu. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  • 

E  (2m  +  2iK')  =  E  (2«)  +  2t  {K'  -  E'). 

Example  3.     Deduce  from  example  2  that 

E{u  +  iK')  =  \E{'lu-Y2iK')->r\k'^iin'{u  +  iK')sn  (2u  +  2iK') 
=  E(u)  +  cnudsu  +  i{K'-E'). 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

E{u  +  K+iK')=E{u)-smidcu  +  E+i{K'-E'). 

Example  5.     Obtain  the  expansions,  valid  when  \I  {x)\  <\itI{t), 

ikAy.n^-u  =  K-^-KE-2.'^   I  n,»cos|^.^      A'Z(.)  =  2.   I  r^^ , 

(Jacobi.) 

*  Exercices  de  Calcul  Integral,  i.  (1811). 
W.  M.  A.  33 


514  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

22*736.     Properties  of  the  complete  elliptic  integrals,  regarded  as  functions 
of  the  modulus. 

If,  in  the  formulae  E=  I      {l—k^siri^<p)^d<^,  we  differentiate  under  the 
sign  of  integration  (§  4'2),  we  have 

^1"  =  -  p^'^-sin^  (/,  (1  - yt^sin^  cfi)-^d(f>=^  ^1^ ' 
Treating  the  formula  for  K  in  the  same  manner,  we  have 


dK      fh^  3  C^ 

=  1      k  sin^  (f)(l-k' sm''  <l>)-id(f>  =  k      sd^ udu 

1     (  rK 


dk     JO  jo 


,,,,,,     dn^wrfw 
kk^  (Jo 


lo 


by  §  2272  example  3  ;  so  that 

dk  ~  kk'""      k  ' 
If  we  write  k"^  =  c,  k''^  —  c' ,  these  results  assume  the  forms 


^dE  ^E-K        ^dK^E-Kc' 
do  c      '  dc  cc' 


Example  1.     Shew  that 

^dE^_  K'-E'      ^dK^_  cK^- E' 

dc  c'       '         dc  cc' 

Example  2.      Shew,  by  diflferentiation   with  regard  to  c,   that  EK'  +  E'K-  KK'  is 
constant. 

Example  3.     Shew  that  K  and  K'  are  sohitions  of 

dkX^"  dk) "''' 

and  that  E  and  E'  -  K'  are  solutions  of 


^"^•0'S)+^'^*  =  ^-  (Legendre.) 


22"737.     The  values  of  the  complete  elliptic  integrals  for  small  values  of  k. 

From  the  integral  definitions  of  E  and  K  it  is  easy  to  see,  by  expanding 
in  powers  of  k,  that 

lim  K=\imE=l'rr,      lim  (K  -  E)/k'  =  J  tt. 

k^O  k^O  k^O 

In  like  manner,  lim  E'  =        cos  (f)d(}>  =  1. 

A;-»0  Jo 

It    is    not    possible    to   determine    lim  K'    in    the    same   way   because 

(1  —  F- sin"-^  </))"-    is   discontinuous    at    (f>  =  0,   k  =  0;    but    it    follows    from 
example  21  of  Chapter  xiv  (p.  293)  that,  when  |argA;j<7r, 

lim  {K'  -  log  (i/k)]  -  0. 

k-fO 


22-736-22*74]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  515 

This  result  is  also  deducible  from  the  formulae  2iK'  =  7rTS3^  ,k=B2^/^3%  by  making 
y  -*  0 ;  or  it  may  be  proved  for  real  values  of  k  by  the  following  elementary  method  : 

By  §22-32,  K'=  j  (t^-k^)'^  {l-fi)~^dt;  now,  when  k<t<sjk,  {\-t^)  lies  between 

1  and  \-k;  and,  when  Jk<t<l,  {t^-k^)/t^  lies  between  1  and  1—^.     Therefore  K'  lies 
between 


J  k  J  ^k 

and  {l-k)-^U      {t^-k^)-^dt+j      t-^  (l-t^)-^dt\ ; 


and  therefore 


^k 

=  (l-^/:)-i[21og{l  +  V(l--^)}-log^], 
where  O^^^l. 

Now  lim  [2  (1  -  <9yfc)~*log  {I  +v/(l  -^)}  -log  4]  =  0, 

lim{l-(l-^/(:)-*}log/5;=0, 
and  therefore  lim  {K'  —  log  (4/^)}  =  0, 

which  is  the  required  result. 

Example.     Deduce  Legendre's  relation  from  §  22 '736  example  2,  by  making  ^-*-0. 

22'74.     The  elliptic  integral  of  the  third  kind*. 
To  evaluate  an  integral  of  the  type 

f(l  +  Nt')-'  {(A,t'  +  B,)  {A,t^  +  B^)]  -  ^  dt 


/^ 


/^ 


in  terms  of  known  functions,  we  make  the  substitution  made  in  the  corre- 
sponding integrals  of  the  first  and  second  kinds  (§§  22*72,  22"73).  The 
integral  is  thereby  reduced  to 

-^ du  =  CM  +  (/3  -  ai^)     -— -—  du, 

where  a,  ^,  v  are  constants ;  if  i/  =  0,  —  1,  oo  or  —  A;-  the  integral  can  be 
expressed  in  terms  of  integrals  of  the  first  and  second  kinds ;  for  other  values 
of  1/  we  determine  the  parameter  a  by  the  equation  v  =  —  k^  sn^  a,  and  then 
it  is  evidently  permissible  to  take  as  the  fundamental  integral  of  the  third 
kind 

„  ,       ,      P  A;2  sn  a  en  a  dn  a  sn^  M  , 

n  (u,  a)  =       — ^ yr, — :, du. 

^       '     J  Q       1  —  «-^  sn^  a  sn^  w 

'  To  express  this  in  terms  of  Theta-functions,  we  observe  that  the  inte- 
grand may  be  written  in  the  form 

2  k^  sn  u  sn  a  {sn  (u  +  a)  4-  sn  {u  —  a)}  =;^{Z{u  —  a)  —  Z  {ii  +  a)  +  2Z  (a)\, 

•*  Legeudre,  Exercices  de  Calcul  Integral,  i.  p.  17;  Fonctions  Elliptiques,  i.  pp.  1-4-18,  74,  7o; 
Jacobi,  Fundamenta  Nova,  pp.  137-172  ;  we  employ  Jacobi's  notation,  not  Legendre's. 

33—2 


516  THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

by  the  addition-theorem  for  the  Zeta-function ;  making  use  of  the  formula 
Z  (u)  =  &'  {u)/@  (u),  we  at  once  get 

TT   /  X  1  1  ^  (U   —  a)  ry  /     s 

a  result  which  shews  that  11  (u,  a)  is  a  many-valued  function  of  u  with 
logarithmic  singularities  at  the  zeros  of  0  (w  +  a). 

Example  1.     Obtain  the  addition-formula* 

n(w,  a)  +  n(v,  a)-n(u-\-v,  a)  =  ilog_  ' ^,—~) — ,    (  ^  ;    , — ' 

,  ,      l-PsnasnusnvHn(u  +  v-  a) 

'  •         ss=ilosr  — ^^ .. 

^     °  l  +  k'^ai\asnu8nvsn{u  +  v  +  a) 

(Legendre.) 

(Take  x  -.1/  iz  :iv  =  u  :v  :  ±a  -.u  +  v  ±a  in  Jacobi's  fundamental  formula 

[4]  +  [l]  =  [4]'  +  [l]'.) 
Example  2.     Shew  that 

n  {u,  a)  —  n  (a,  u)  =  uZ (a)  —aZ  (u). 

(Legendre  and  Jacobi.) 

[This  is  known  as  the  formula  for  interchange  of  argument  and  parameter.] 

Example  3.     Shew  that 

n(u,  a)  +  n(u,b)-n(u,a  +  b)  =  h  log  , — jr, t ) — -i i 

^  '     ^         ^  '    ^         \  >     -T^  /     2     ^  i  +  kiauaanbmusQ{a  +  b+u) 

+  liJc^  sn  a  sn  6  sn  (a  +  b). 

(Jacobi.) 
[This  is  known  as  the  formula  for  addition  of  parameters.] 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

n  {iu,  ia  +  A",  ^)  =  n  («,  a -H  A'',  k').  (Jacobi.) 

Example  5.     Shew  that 

n(M  +  i?,  a  +  6)  +  n(M-i;,  a-6)-2n(M,  a)-2n(^^,  b) 

70              If/         \       ,       -IS     ,         N       ,       7^.     1  1      \  —  k~8v?{u-a)fiV?{v-b) 
=  -  «-  sn  a  sn  6 .  ■  (?« -fr?)  sn  (a-f-  6)  -  («  -  v)  sn  (a  -  b)\  +  i  log ,  — ^s — 5-7 { — 5-7 r\  > 

and  obtain  sijecial  forms  of  this  result  by  putting  v  orb  equal  to  zero.  (Jacobi.) 

22'741.     A  dynamical  application  of  the  elliptic  integral  of  the  third  kind. 

It  is  evident  from  the  expression  for  n  (w,  a)  in  terms  of  Theta-functions  that  if  «,  a,  k 
are  real,  the  average  rate  of  increase  of  11  (li,  a)  as  u  increases  is  Z  (a),  since  6  (M±a)  is 
periodic  with  respect  to  the  real  period  2A'. 

This  result  determines  the  mean  precession  about  the  invariable  line  in  the  motion  of 
a  rigid  body  relative  to  its  centre  of  gravity  under  forces  whose  resultant  passes  through 
its  centre  of  gravity.  It  is  evident  that,  for  purposes  of  computation,  a  resvilt  of  this  nature 
is  preferable  to  the  corresponding  result  in  terms  of  Sigma-functions  and  Weierstrassian 
Zeta-functions,  for  the  reasons  that  the  Theta-functions  have  a  specially  simple  behaviour 
with  respect  to  their  real  jjeriod — the  period  which  is  of  importance  in  Applied  Mathe- 
matics— and  that  the  g'-series  are  much  better  adapted  for  computation  than  the  product 
by  which  the  Sigma-function  is  most  simply  defined. 

*  No  fewer  than  96  forms  have  been  obtained  for  the  expression  on  the  right.  See  Glaisher, 
Messenger,  x.  p.  124. 


22-741,  22-8]  the  jacobian  elliptic  functions  517 

22*8.     The  lemniscate  functions. 

rx 

The  integi-al  1    (1  —  t*)~^  c^^occurs  in  the  problem  of  rectifying  the  arc  of 

J  0 

the   lemniscate*;   if  the  integral  be  denoted   by  (f),  we   shall   express  the 
relation  between  <f)  and  a;  by  writing^  w  =  sin  lemn  (f). 

In  like  manner,  if 

J  X  "  ^  0 

we  write 

a;  =  cos  lemn  (f>i, 
and  we  have  the  relation 

sin  lemn  (f>  =  cos  lemn  (2^  ~  0  )• 

These  lemniscate  functions,  which  were  the  first  functions  J  defined  by  the 
inversion  of  an  integral,  can  easily  be  expressed  in  terms  of  elliptic  functions 
with  modulus  l/\/2 ;  for,  from  the  formula  (§  22"122  example) 

fsAu 

u=         {( 1  -  k'^if)  ( 1  +  ky^)]  ~^dy, 

■'  0 

it  is  easy  to  see  (on  writing  y=^t\JT)  that 

sin  lemn  <^  =  2  -  ^  sd  (<^  v/2,  1  /  V2) ; 
similarly,  cos  lemn  <f)  =  cn(<f)  \/2,  1  /\/2). 

Further,  2^  ^^  ^^.e  smallest  positive  value  of  <^  for  which 

cn(<^V2,  l/\/2)  =  0, 
so  that  w  =  f^^Ko, 

the  suffix  attached  to  the  complete   elliptic  integral   denoting   that   it   is 
formed  with  the  particular  modulus  l/\/2. 

This  result  renders  it  possible  to  express  Ko  in  terms  of  Gamma-functions, 
thus 

^0=2*  (\l-P)-^dt  =  2-^  ru-^(l-u)-idu 

Jo  Jo 

=  2-tr(i)rQ)/r(f)  =  i7r-i{r(i)h 

a  result  first  obtained  by  Legendre§. 

Since  k  =  k'  when  k  =  l/\/2,  it  follows  that  Kq  =  Kq,  and  so  q^  =  e'". 

*  The  equation   of  the   lemniscate    being  r'^  —  a^co?,2d,  it    is   easy  to   derive  the    equation 

/d8\2         a4      ,  ,     ^  ,     /ds\2     ,      frddY 

I  ^-  )   =  — i 7  from  the  formula     -;-     =  1  +    —,— 

\drj       a*-r*  \dr/  \  dr  J 

t  Gauss  wrote  si  and  cl  for  sin  lemn  and  cos  lemn  {Werke,  iii.  p.  493). 

X  Gauss,  Werke,  iii.  p.  404.  The  idea  of  investigating  the  functions  occurred  to  Gauss  on 
January  8,  1797. 

§  Exercices  de  Calcul  Integral,  i.  p.  209.  The  value  of  A'q  is  1-85407468...,  while 
'5r  =  2-62205756.... 


518  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

Example  1.  Express  Kq  in  terms  of  Gamma-functions  by  using  Rummer's  formula 
(see  Chapter  xiv,  example  12,  p.  292). 

Example  2.     By  writing  ^  =  (1  —  m^)*  in  the  formula 

Eo=f\i-^t^)Hi-fiy^dt, 

Jo 
shew  that  2^ Eo=  j    (l-it'^)-^du+  j   u^{\-u*)~^du, 

and  deduce  that  2^o  -  A'o  =  27r^  {r  (J)}  -  2. 

Example  3.  Deduce  Legendre's  relation  {%  22'735)  from  example  2  combined  with 
§  22-736  example  2. 

Example  4.     Shew  that 

.    1        „  ,     1  — coslemn'^d) 

sm  lemn^  m  = , -. -^ri . 

l+coslemn'^9 

22*81.     The  vahies  of  K  and  K'  for  special  values  of  k. 

It  has  been  seen  that,  when  ^  =  1/^2,  K  can  be  evaluated  in  terms  of  Gamma-functions, 
and  K—K' ;  this  is  a  special  case  of  a  general  theorem*  that,  whenever 

K'  _a  +  h  ^n 

K  ~  c  +  dsjn^ 

where  a,  b,  c,  d,  n  are  integers,  k  is  a  root  of  an  algebraic  equation  with  integral 
coefficients. 

This  theorem  is  based  on  the  theory  of  the  transformation  of  elliptic  functions  and  is 
beyond  the  scope  of  this  book ;  but  there  are  three  distinct  cases  in  which  k,  K,  K'  all 
have  fairly  simple  values,  namely 

(J)  k=>j2-\,      K'  =  K^2, 

(II)  k^am^iT,    K'  =  K^Z, 

(III)  y5:=tan2l7r,     K'  =  2K. 

Of  these  we  shall  give  a  brief  investigation  f. 

(I)  The  quarter-periods  with  the  modulus  ^2  —  \. 

Landen's  transformation  gives  a  relation  between  elliptic  functions  with  any  modulus  k 
and  those  with  modulus  k-^  —  {\  —  k')l{\  -^-k') ;  and  the  quarter-periods  A,  A'  associated  with 
the  modulus  k^  satisfy  the  relation  A'lA=^2K'/K. 

If  we  choose  k  so  that  ki  =  k',  then  A  =  K'  and  k^  =k  so  that  A'  =  K ;  and  the  relation 
A'/ A  =  2K'/I{  gives  A'2  =  2a2, 

Therefore  the  quarter-periods  A,  A'  associated  with  the  modulus  ki  given  by  the 
equation  ki  =  {l-ki)l{l+k^)  are  such  that  A'=±Av^2;  i.e.  if  ^i  =  v'2-l,  then  A'  =  Av/2 
(since  A,  A'  obviously  are  both  positive). 

(II)  The  quarter-periods  associated  with  the  modidus  sin^oTr. 

The  case  of  k  =  s,\\i^^ir  was  discussed  by  LegendreJ  ;  he  obtained  the  remarkable 
result  that,  with  this  value  of  k, 

K'  =  K^Z. 

*  Abel,  Oeuvres,  i.  p.  377. 

t  For  some  similar  formulae  of  a  less  simple  nature,  see  Kronecker,  Berlin.  Sitzungsberichte, 
1857,  1862. 

J  Exercices  de  Calcul  Intigraly  i.  pp.  59,  210  ;  Fonctions  Elliptiques,  i.  pp.  59,  60. 


22*81]  THE   JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  619 

This  result  follows  from  the  relation  between  definite  integrals 

To  obtain  this  relation,  consider  j(l-z^)~^dz  taken  round  the  contour  formed  by  the 

part  of  the  real  axis  (indented  at  «=1  by  an  arc  of  radius  R~'^)  joining  the  points  0  and 
R,  the  line  joining  Re^^^  to  0  and  the  arc  of  radius  R  joining  the  points  R  and  /2e*"* ;  as 
R-*'  00 ,  the  integral  round  the  arc  tends  to  zero,  as  does  the  integral  round  the  indentation, 
and  so,  by  Cauchy's  theorem, 

r {l-.i^y^dx  +  if'^  {.7^-\)-^dx  +  e^'^j     (l+x^)~^dx=0, 

Jo  J  \  .'  00 

on  writing  x  and  xe^^^  respectively  for  z  on  the  two  straight  lines. 
Writing 

hi-x^)~^dx=ii,    r {jfi-\)-^dx=i^,    r{i+x^y^dx=r   {l-x^y^dx=rs, 

we  have  7i  +  i/2=^(l+iV3)/3; 

so,  equating  real  and  imaginary  parts, 

and  therefore  /x  +  Zs  — /2v'3  =  ^/3  +  /3  — f /3  =  0, 

which  is  the  relation  stated*. 

Now,  by  §  22-72  example  6, 

where  the  modulus  is  a{a'^+^y^  and 

a2  =  2v/3-3,     /32  =  2v'3  +  3, 
so  that  F  =  i  (2  -  V3)  =  sin2  ^  «-. 

We  therefore  have 

3-i.2^=3-*.2^'  =  72=3*/i 

=  Z-^\-\\-tyUt=ln'^T{^)lT{l), 
J  0 

when  the  modulus  k  is  sin-jij""- 

(III)     The  quarter-periods  \oith  the  modtdus  tan^l^jr. 

If,  in  Landen's  transformation  (§  22-42),  we  take  k=llJ2,  we  have  A'lA  =  2K'IK=2; 
now  this  value  of  k  gives 

and  the  corresponding  quarter-periods  A,  A'  are  ^(1  +2""*)  ^o  ^-nd  (l  +  2~*)  A'q. 

Example  1.  Discuss  the  quarter- periods  when  k  has  the  values  (2^^2-2)',  sin^j^jr, 
and  2^(^/2-1). 

♦  Another  method  of  obtaining  the  relation  is  to  express  Jj,  I2,  I3  in  terms  of  Gamma- 
functions  by  writing  t^,  t~^,  (t~i-l)*  respectively  for  x  in  the  integrals  by  which  Ii,  I2,  I3  are 
defined. 


520  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

Example  2.     Shew  that 

n=0  re=l 

(Glaisher,  Messenger,  v.) 

Example  3.     Express  the  coordinates  of  any  point  on  the  curve  y'^=x^  -1  in  the  form 

2  .  3*  su  w  dn  M 


,     3*(l-cnM)  2.3*s 

l  +  cn%     '    -^         (1  + 


(l  +  cntt)2     ' 
where  the  modulus  of  the  eUiptic  functions  is  sin^Tr,  and  shew  that  ^  =  3~*y. 

By  considering  I     3('~io?^=3    *l       (iw,  evaluate  iS" in  terms  of  Gamma-functions  when 
i{;  =  sinJ2'r. 

Example  4.     Shew  that,  when  y2  =  ^3  _  j^ 

and  thence,  by  using  example  3  and  expressing  the  last  integral  in  terms  of  Gamma- 
functions  by  the  substitution  x—t~^,  obtain  the  formula  of  Legendre  {Calcul  Integral, 
p.  60)  connecting  the  first  and  second  complete  elliptic  integrals  with  modulus  sin  yV  it  : 


4-53=^(^-^4- 


Example  5.     By  expressing  the  coordinates  of  any  point  on  the  curve  F^  =  1  -  X^  in 
the  form 

3-(l-cnv)  2.3^snvdnv 

"^~^        \+^n^'  (H-cn?;)"2~' 

in  which  the  modulus  of  the  elliptic  functions  is  sin  -f^  tt,  and  evaluating 


+      ^  Y-^{l-XydX 

in  terms  of  Gamma-functions,  obtain  Legendre's  result  that*,  when  ^=sin  j^tt, 

"■  V3     „,  ( J-,,    v/3  —  1 


'=^'{^'-^73'^'} 


22*82.     A  geometrical  illustration  of  the  functions  snu,  cmt,  dnu. 

A  geometrical  representation  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  with  k  =  l/^j2  is  aflforded  by 
the  arc  of  the  lemniscate,  as  has  been  seen  in  §  22"8 ;  to  represent  the  Jacobian  functions 
with  any  modulus  k  (0<^<1),  we  may  make  use  of  a  cwve  described  on  a  sphere,  known 
as  Seiffert's  spherical  spiral-^. 

Take  a  sphere  of  radius  unity  with  centre  at  the  origin,  and  let  the  cylindrical  polar 
coordinates  of  any  point  on  it  be  (p,  <^,  z),  so  that  the  arc  of  a  curve  traced  on  the  sphere 
is  given  by  the  formula  J 

{dsf  =  p^{dcl>Y  +  {l-p^)-'{dpf. 

*  It  is  interesting  to  observe  that,  when  Legendre  had  proved  by  differentiation  that 
EK'  +  E'K  -  KK'  is  constant,  he  used  the  results  of  examples  4  and  5  to  determine  the  constant, 
before  using  the  methods  of  §  22-8  example  3  and  of  §  22-737, 

+  Seiffert,  Ueber  eine  neue  geometrische  Einfiihnmg  in  die  Theorie  der  elUptisclien  Funktionen 
(Charlottenburg,  1896). 

X  This  is  an  obvious  transformation  of  the  formula  [ds)"^  =  {dp)"^  +  p"^  {dcf))'^  +  [dz)"^  when 
p  and  z  are  connected  by  the  relation  p'^  +  z'^  =  l. 


22-82]  THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  521 

Seiffert's  spiral  is  defined  by  the  equation 

(p  =  kg, 

where  s  is  the  arc  measured  from  the  pole  of  the  sphere  (i.e.  the  point  where  the  axis  of  z 
meets  the  sphere)  and  ^  is  a  positive  constant,  less  than  unity*. 

For  this  curve  we  have 

and  so,  since  s  and  p  vanish  together, 

p  =  sn  (s,  k). 

The  cylindrical  polar  coordinates  of  any  point  on  the  ciu-ve  expressed  in  terms  of  the 
arc  measured  from  the  pole  are  therefore 

(p,  (f),  z)  —  (sn  s,  ks,  cu  s) ; 

and  dn  s  is  easily  seen  to  be  the  cosine  of  the  angle  at  which  the  curve  cuts  the  meridian. 
Hence  it  may  be  seen  that,  if  K  be  the  arc  of  the  curve  from  the  pole  to  the  equator,  then 
sn  s  and  en  s  have  period  4K,  while  dn  s  has  period  2K. 


REFERENCES. 

A.  M.  Legendre,  Fonctions  Elliptiques. 

C.  G.  J.  Jacobi,  Fundamenta  Nova  Theoriae  Functionum  Ellipticarum  (Konigsberg, 
1829). 

J.  Tannery  et  J.  Molk,  Fonctions  Elliptiques. 

A.  Catley,  Elliptic  Functions. 

P.  F.  Verhulst,  Traite  elementaire  des  fonctions  elliptiques  (Brussels,  1841). 

A.  Enneper,  Elliptische  Funktionen,  Zweite  Auflage  von  F.  Miiller  (Halle,  1890). 


Miscellaneous  Examples. 

1.  Shew  that  one  of  the  values  of 

J/dnM  +  cnM\*      /dnM-cnM\*"l  J/     1— sn?i     \^      /     l  +  snw     \*"l 
|\    l+cuM  /        \    1  — cn?i   )  )   \\dnu  —  k' %uu)        ydiwu  +  k'  »nu)  j 

is  2(1 +/&').  (Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

2.  If  .r  +  iy  =  sn2(M+zv)  and  x  —  iy  =  iirfi  {u  —  iv),  shew  that 

{(^  -  l)2+.^2|i= (^'2 + /)^  dn  22t  +  en  2m. 


(M^th.  Trip.  1911.) 


3.     Shew  that 


4.     Shew  that 


,,           ,         ,-  ,,           ,         ,,         (en  ti  +  cn  vY 
{1  ±  en  lu  +  v)}  {1  ±  en  {u  -v)]=  ~~f^ — 5 -»-  . 


cn^  ^l  +  cn2  v 

1  +  en  {u  +  v)  en  (;<  -  r)  =  — jr, — , ^  . 

^         '       ^  \-  k'  sn-  u  sn''  v 

(Jacobi.) 
*  If  /c  >  1,  the  curve  is  imaginai-y. 


(Jacobi.) 


622  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

t-      T.  l  +  cn  (u+v)  cn  (u  —  v)  «       ..         ,.0  o 

5.  Express  - — 3 — } .—, — ) ;   as  a  function  of  sn^^s  +  sm-y. 

^         l+dn{u  +  v)du{ii-v) 

(Math.  Trip.  1909.) 

6.  Shew  that 

,        ,  ,    ,        ,     sn  tt  dn  M  en  V  —  sn  V  dn  v  en  w 

sn  (u-v)  dn  {u  +  v)  = 1 — jr, — 5 5 • 

(Jacobi.) 

7.  Shew  that 

{l-(l  +  /fc')sn«sn(w  +  A'')}  {l-{l-k')snusn{u  + K)}  =  {sn{u  +  K)-anuf. 

(Math.  Trip.  1914.) 

8.  Shew  that 

1  T^^s     /,      ,,,  _i  ^'snM  +  cnwdnM 

sn  {u+^iK')  =  k-^  {l+k).nu  +  icr^dnu^ 
^       ^  l+«sn^i6 

9.  Shew  .that 

.     .       ,         ,  ,         , ,      2  sn  ?t  en  n  dn  v 

sin  {am  (w  +  v)  -i- am  (%  -  y)}  =  :, — j^. — 5 5— , 

^       ^         '  ^  '      \  —  k'-  sir  M  sn'^  y 

,,      en^  y  —  sn^ -i;  dn^  It 
cos  {am  («  +  ^) -am  {n-v)\  =  -^-^^--^---^^- . 

10.  Shew  that     • 

,  V  ,     ,         ^     ds^  wds^  v+F^'2 

^"(^  +  '^)^"(^^-^^=    ns-^^ns^^-/:-^   ' 
and  hence  express 

rg>(w  +  ^)-e2    g>(w--?;)-e2'j* 
L(p  (16  + w)  -  e,  ■  g>  (?t  -  y)  -  egj 

as  a  rational  function  of  ^  («)  and  f>  (y).  (Trinity,  1903.) 

11.  From  the  formulae  for  on  (2/f-w)  and  dn  {2K-u)  combined  with  the  formulae 
for  l+cn2i(  and  l+dn2?(,  shew  that 

(l-cnfA')(l  +  cln§/ir)  =  l.  (Trinity,  1906.) 

12.  With  notation  similar  to  that  of  §  22-2,  shew  that 

Ci o?2  -c^di  _  en  {til  +  M2)  —  dn  (mj + M2)  _ 
Sj  -  ^2  sn  («i  +  M2)  ' 

and  deduce  that,  if  ?fi  +  tt2  +  %  +  ^<4  =  2A',  then 

(Ci  ^2  -  C2C?l)  (C3<^4  -  C40?3)  =  ^'^  («1 "  S2)  (^S  "  S4)- 

(Trinity,  1906.) 

13.  Shew  that,  if  u  +  v  +  w=0,  then 

1  -  dn^  u  -  dn^  v  —  dn^  iv  +  2  dn  «  dn  «;  dn  w  =  k^  sn^  «  sn^  y  sn^  w. 

(Math.  Trip.  1907.) 

14.  By  Liouville's  theorem  or  otherwise,  shew  that 

dn  ?( dn  (?<  +  w)  —  dn  v  dn  (y  +  to)  =  B  (sn  v  en  m  sn  (y  +  ?<■-)  en  (m  +  w) 

-  sn  M  en  V  sn  (w  +  w)  en  («  +  ?»)}. 

(Math.  Trip.  1910.) 

15.  Shew  that 

2  en  W2  en  %  sn  (m2  -  %)  dn  ?<.i  +  sn  (?<2  -  ^3)  sn  (M3  -  Ui)  sn  (?<i  —  u^)  dn  tti  dn  ?<2  dn  ii^  =  0, 
the  summation  applying  to  the  suffices  1,  2,  3.  (Math.  Trip.  1894.) 


18.     If  P(u)=i  , ^ , 

P  (u)  +  P  (m  +  2iX')  an  2u  en  m 


THE   JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  523 

16.  Obtain  the  formulae 

Hndu=A/D,    onSu=BID,    dn3M=C/i), 
where  ^  =  3#  -  4  (l  +  P)»3  +  6i{rV ->?:*«», 

B  =  c{\-4s^  +  6k'^.<t*-4k*ifi+k*s»}, 
C  =  d{l-  4/fc2a2  +  Qk^s*  _  4;t2«6  +  /^«8}, 

and  8  =  8nu,     c=cnu,     d=dnu. 

17.  Shew  that 

1  -dn  3m _  /I— dnwX   /1  +  ai  dn  M+a2dn2tt  +  a3dn3M  +  a4dn*«Y 
l  +  dnSw      \l+dnM/  \\.  —  aidnu  +  a2dn^u-a3dn^u  +  aidn*uJ^ 
where  ai,  a2,  as,  at  are  constants  to  be  determined.  (Trinity,  1912.) 

a+dn3M\* 

shew  that  „,  ,      ,, ,       .,  ..„^  - 

P  (?t)  —  /•(?«  +  2iiA  )  en  iu  sn  m 

Determine  the  poles  and  zeros  of  P{u)  and  the  first  term  in  the  expansion  of  the 
function  about  each  pole  and  zero. 

(Math.  Trip.   1908.) 

19.  Shew  that 

sn(Mi  +  W2  +  «3)  =  -4/i>,     cn(Mi  +  ?<2  4-M3)  =  i?/-0,     dn(?fj  +  «2  +  %)  =  ^/A 
where 

^  =«ia283  {  - 1  - F  +  2F2si2  -  (F  +  yH)  2S22S32  +  2yHSi2«22532} 

+  2  {Si  02C30?20?3  (1  +  2FS22S32  -  F2«22«3^)}, 
5=CiC2C3  {1  -F2S22S32  + 2/^4^12522532} 

+  2  {Ci52S3^2t^3  (  -  1  +2/{;2s22V  +  2P8i2-F2S22«3'')}, 
C  =C?lO?2C?3  {1  -  F2«22S32  4-2FS12S22S32} 

+  F2  {C^1S2«3C2C3  (  -  1  +2Fs22«32  +  2Si2-  ^252253^)}, 
i)  =  l  -  2F2S22«32  +  4  (F  +X-4)  Si2522gg2_2;(45j2g22s322sj2  + ^455^4534^ 

and  the  summations  refer  to  the  suffices  1,  2,  3.  (Glaisher,  Messenger,  xi.) 

20.  Shew  that 

sn  {ui  +  u<i-\-U3)  —  A'jD',     en  {ui  +  U2  +  us)  =  B'ID',    ■dn{ui+tC2  +  U3)  =  G'/D', 
where  J.'  =  2siC2C3(^2''^3  -  «i*2«3  {l  +  k'^  —  k'^^s{^+k*Si^S2^s.J^), 

B'  =  Ci C2C3  (1  —  k^Si^s^^s^)  —  did2ds'2s2SzCidi , 

C"  =  0?i  (^2  (^3  ( 1  —  ^^  81^  ^2"  *3")  ~  ^^  ^1  ''2  C3  2*2  «3  Cl  tl?i , 

Z)'  =  1  -  F 26-22532 +  (F  + A;*)  5^2^22 S32_  ^2 5j52S32Si C3C30?2£^3- 

(Cay ley,  Crelle,  XLI.) 

21.  By  applying  Abel's  method  (§  20-312)  to  the  intersections  of  the  twisted  curve 
^2^y2_i^  22^^2^2  —  1  ^itj^  ^]jg  variable  plane  lx-\-my-^nz=\,  shew  that,  if 

i(l  +  M2  +  «3  +  2<4  =  0> 


then 


:0. 


Si     Ci     dy     1 

52  C.,      d^       1 

53  ^3       f/3       1 

54  C4     di     1 
Obtain  this  result  also  from  the  equation 

(52  -  Sl )  (C3  C^4  -  C4  C?3)  +  (S4  -  S3)  (Cl  C?2  -  ^2  0?1 )  =  0, 

which  may  be  proved  by  the  method  of  example  12. 


(Cayley,  Messenger,  xiv. 


524 

22.     Shew  that 


THE   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS 


[chap.  XXII 


by  expressing  each  side  in  terms  of  s^,  S2,  S3,  S4 ;  and  deduce  from  example  21  that,  if 

Ul.+  U2  +  U3  +  Ui  =  0, 

then  S4  Ci  c/2  +  *3  <^2  di  +  «2  ^3  di  +  .Sj  C4  (^3  =  0, 

«4  ^2  <^l  +  «3  Cl  0^2  +  «2  <^4  <^3  +  Si  C3  0^4  =  0. 

(Forsyth,  Messenger,  xiv.) 

23.  Deduce  from  Jacobi's  fundamental  Theta-function  formulae  that,  if 

Wl  +  «2  +  %  +  i«4  =  0, 

then  ](f^  —  k'^  F^  Si  s^  »3  S4 + P  Cj  c^  C3  C4  —  c^^  d^  d^  0^4 = 0. 

(Gudermann,  Crelle,  xviii.) 

24.  Deduce  from  Jacobi's  fundamental  Theta-function  formulae  that,  if 

Ui  +  U2  +  U3  +  Ui  =  0, 

then  1-2  (^g^  g^  (,g  (.^  _  gj  g^  53  «4)  —  o?i  o?2 + o?3  o?4  =  0, 

^'2  (Sj«2  — 5384)  + rfjO?2  0304  —  01^20^3  <3?4  =  0, 

Sis^d^di  —  dy  d-yS^Si  -f  C3C4  -  CiC2= 0. 

(H.  J.  S.  Smith,  Froc.  London  Math.  Soc.  (1),  x.) 

25.  If  ^ii  +  u^  +  iis  +  Ui  —  O,  shew  that  the  cross-ratio  of  sn^i,  sn«2j  sn^s,  snM4  is  equal 
to  the  cross-ratio  of  su{ni  +  K\  sn(M2-i-A'),  sn(ji3-f-A'),  sn(?<4-f  A"). 

(Math.  Trip.  1905.) 

26.  Shew  that 


sn2  (u  +  v)  sn  {u  +  v)  sn  (u  —  v)  sn^  {u  -  v) 
cn^  {u  +  v)  en  {u-\-v)Gn  (u  —  v)  cn^  (u-v) 
dn^{u-{-v)     dn  (?(4-v)  dn  (w  — i')     dn^{u-v) 


8k'^SiS2^CiC2did2 

{i-k^sys2^f  • 


(Math.  Trip.  1913.) 


27.     Find  all  systems  of  values  of  u  and  v  for  which  sn^{u  +  {v)  is  real  when  m  and  v 
are  real  and  0<F<1.  (Math.  Trip.  1901.) 


28.     If  ^•'  =  |(a-i-a)2,  where  0<a<l,  shew  that 

4a3 


sn^i-A: 


(l-t-a''')(i  +  2rt-a^)' 
and  that  sn^^K  is  obtained  by  writing   —a~^  for  a  in  this  expression. 

(Math.  Trip.  1902.) 

29.     If  the  values  of  en  2,  which  are  such  that  cn3z=a,  are  Ci,  C2,  ...  Cg,  shew  that 


3^*  n  Cr  +  k'*  2  -0^  =  0. 

r=l  r=l 


(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 


30.     If 


a+sn{u  +  v)      b  +  cn  (ri  +  v)      c  +  dn  (u  +  v) 


a  +  Hn{u—v)      b  +  cii  {71-v)      c  +  dn  (?(  —  ?;)' 

and  if  none  of  snv,  cnw,  dn «,   I  —  k^  sn^  ii  sn^  v  vanish,  shew  that  u  is  given   by  the 
equation 


F  (/L-'2  a2  +  &2  _  c2)  sn2  u = k'-^  +  Pb^-c^. 


(King's,  1900. 


THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  526 

31.     Shew  that 

(Math.  Trip.  1912.) 


32.     Shew  that 

l-sn(2^a;/7r) 


_     "       n  -2g2n-Isip^^g4n-2^ 


{dn(2A'a7/jr)-/{:'sn(2A'j7/7r)}*      »=i   U  4-2'72»-i  8in^  +  5?* 

(Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

33.  Shew  that  if  k  be  so  small  that  ^  may  be  neglected,  then 

snu= sin  u  —  ^^^  cos  u  .  {u  —  sin  m  cos  m), 
for  small  values  of  u.  (Trinity,  1904.) 

34.  Shew  that,  if  \I{x)\<  ^nl  (t),  then 

logcn(2^^/7r)  =  logcos.r—    2 


„=i  n{l+  (-?)"}• 

(Math.  Trip.  1907.) 
[Integrate  the  Fourier  series  for  sn  {'iKxjn)  dc  {2Kxlir).'] 

35.  Shew  that 

_/ 0     cn-'wdn^w  '^         ^        " 

(Math.  Trip.  1906.) 
[Expi-ess  the  integrand  in  terms  of  functions  of  2m.] 

36.  Shew  that 

/*    en  vdu    ^       Si  (^x+y-jv)  Si  (^x+y-W-^TTT)  _  ^  ^i'  (y+j^rr) 
j  snv-snM        ^  ■9i(i^-iy)5i(i.«''-iy-iTr)  ^i(y+iTr)' 

where  2Kx=iru,  2%  =  »rv.  (Math.  Trip.  1912.) 

37.  Shew  that 

^^  +  ^)^    jo  (l+cn^Odn^?.-^- 

(Math.  Trip.  1903.) 

38.  Shew  that 

,    f<^+P  ,       ,       H-^snasn/3 

a:  I         sn^^a2i  =  Iog, — , ^. 

J  a-/3  1  -  AsnasujS 

(St  John's,  1914.) 

39.  By   integrating    Je^^dnw  cs?/(f2    round    a    rectangle    whose    corners    are    ±^v, 
±iir  +  cci  (where  2Kz  =  Tru)  and  then  integrating  by  parts,  shew  that,  if  0<P<1,  then 

I     cos  {iriijK)  log  sn  u du  =  ^K  tanli  (i ttzV). 

Jo  -  . 

(Math.  Trip.  1902.) 

40.  Shew  that  K  and  K'  satisfy  the  equation 

where  c  =  k'^;  and  deduce  that  they  satisfy  Legendre's  equation  for  functions  of  degree 
—  J-  with  argument  1  —  'ik'^. 


526  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

41.     Express  the  coordinates  of  any  point  on  the  curve  a;^+^^  =  l  in  the  form 
2.3*snwdnM-(l— cnw)2         _2t  cos^tt  (1— en  w)  {l+tan^n- cnw} 
2.S^  snudnu  +  (l  —  cmi)^  2  .S*  Hmt6nu  +  {l-cnu)^ 

the  moduhis  of  the  elliptic  functions  being  sin^Tr  ;  and  shew  that 


J  X  Jo' 


Shew  further  that  the  sum  of  the  parameters  of  three  collinear  points  on  the  cubic  is  a 
period. 

[See  Richelot,  Crelle,  ix.  and  Cayley,  Proc.  Camh.  Phil.  Soc.  iv.  A  uniformising  variable 
for  the  general  cubic  in  the  canonical  form  X^-\-Y^  +  Z^  +  QmXYZ=0  has  been  obtained 
by  Bobek,  Einleitung  in  die  Theorie  der  elliptischen  Funhtionen  (Leipzig,  1884),  p.  251, 
Dixon  {Quarterly  Journal,  xxiv.)  has  developed  the  theory  of  elliptic  functions  by  taking 
the  equivalent  curve  sfi+y^  -  ^axy=\  as  fundamental,  instead  of  the  curve 

y2=(l-^-2)(l_^2^2).] 
/2 

42.  Express  /  {{2x  —  x^)  {Ax^-{-%))~^ dx  in  terms  of  a  complete  elliptic  integi-al  of  the 
first  kind  with  a  real  modulus.  (Math.  Trip.  1911.) 


43.     If  u=i   {{t+\)lf  +  t  +  \)]-^dt, 

J  X 


express  x  in  terms  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  of  u  with  a  real  modulus. 

(Math.  Trip.  1899.) 


44.     If  u=r  {\-\-fi-  2t^)  -  ^  dt. 


express  x  in  terms  of  u  by  means  of  either  Jacobian  or  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions. 

(Math.  Trip.  1914.) 

45.  Shew  that 

,-+,-9.+,-25.^._(2i::i)r(i)_ 

2^^TT^ 

(Trinity,  1881.) 

46.  When  a>.r>/3>y,  reduce  the  integrals 

j\{a-t){t-ff){t-y)]-^dt,  j''^{(a-t){t-^){t-y)}-idt 

by  the  substitutions 

x  —  y=(a  —  y)  dn^ u,     x  —  y  =  {j3—y)  nd^ v 

respectively,  where  F^=(a  — /3)/(a  — y). 

Deduce  that,  if  u  +  v  =  K,  then 

1  -  su-  u  —  sn"-'  V  +  k'^  an-  u  sn^  v  =  0. 

By  the  substitution  y  —  [a  —  t)  {t  —  (i)l{t-y)  applied  to  the  above  integral  taken  between 
the  limits  /3  and  a,  obtain  the  Gaussian  form  of  Landen's  transformation, 

r    (ai2cos2^  +  6i2sin2^)-*c^5=  f     {a^  coii^  6  + h"^  am- 6)'^ d6, 

where  a^,  hy  are  the  arithmetic  and  geometric  means  between  a  and  h. 

(Gauss,    Werke,  ill.  p.  352;    Math.  Trip.  1895.) 


THE  JACOBIAN   ELLIPTIC   FUNCTIONS  527 

47.  Shew  that 

Qcu=-kf-^{C{u-K)-i{u-K-^liK')-C{2iK')}, 

where  the  Zeta-functions  are  formed  with  periods  2<ai,  2a)2  =  2A',  4t,ff '. 

(Math.  Trip.  1903.) 

48.  Shew  that  E-  k"^K  satisfies  the  equation 

4cc  -Y-^=u, 
where  c  =  /^2,  and  obtain  the  primitive  of  this  equation.  (Math.  Trip.  1911.) 

49.  Shew  that  n  j   k^'K'dk^in-l)  j  k^-^E'dk, 

in+2)  l^k^E'dk  =  {n  +  l)  \^ t'K'dk.  (Trinity,  1906.) 

y  0  y  0 

50.  If  v,=  \l''{t{\-t){\-ct))-^dt, 

Shew  that  c(c-l)^+(2c-l)^  +  5^.  =  -|^^f-^3|. 

(Trinity,  1896.) 

51.  Shew  that  the  primitive  of 

du     %<?■         k     _ 

_  A{E-K)+A'E' 
^  ^~'AE+A'{E'-K'y 

where  A,  A'  are  constants.  (Math.  Trip.  1906.) 

52.  Deduce  from  the  addition-formula  for  E{u)  that,  if 

Ml  +  ^2  +  W34-tt4  =  0, 

then  (sn  Ui  sn  -^2  —  sn  ?<3  sn  ?«4)  sn  (Mi  -|-  u^) 

is  unaltered  by  any  permutation  of  sufl&ces.  (Math.  Trip.  1910.) 

53.  Shew  that 

E{3ic)-SE{u)  = 


1 .-  6Fs*  +  4  (/t-^  +  k*)  s^  -  3k*s» ' 

(Math.  Trip.  1913.) 

54.  Shew  that 

Sk*  I      tt  cd*  udu  =  2  K  {(2  +  /?•'')  A'  -  2  ( 1  +  ^2)  ^| ^ 
[Write  ?<=A+v.]        '  (Math.  Trip.  1904.) 

55.  By  considering  the  curves  y^=x{\—x){\-k'^x),  i/  =  l  +  mx  +  nx%  shew  that,  if 
7ii  +  Ui  +  U3  +  Ui  =  0,  then 

E{Ui)+E{U2)  +  E{U3)  +  E(u^)  =  k\    2   Sr^+2CiC2C3Ci-2Sj^S2S3Si-2i   . 

(Math.  Trip.  1908.) 

56.  By   the   method   of    example   21,    obtain   the   following  seven    expressions   for 
E{ii^-\-E{u^  +  E{u3)  +  E{Ui)  when  u^  +  u.^-\-U3-\-iti  =  0: 

Y'^Bs^HHS.rLx  ''  k'-'  +  d,d.d3d,rtl  '''  k^C^C^C^C^- k'^  ^^^S,a,ICr, 

k'-s^SiS^s^did^d^dj       *    ^       ^^  -F-c^c^c^c^d^d^d^d^  |   s  /(c  (^ ) 

CjC2C3C4  +  ^r'2s^S2S3«4  »•=! 

-  F{(5iS2S3«4)~'  +  (CjCoCaCi)-!  -|-X-'(0fiC^2C?3^4)~^r^     2     l/(s^C,,(/,.). 

r=l 

(Forsyth,  Messenger,  xv.) 


528  THE  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  [CHAP.  XXII 

57.  Shew  that 

™=i       -I-  ~  9 
when  \  I(a7)\< irI{T) ;  and,  by  differentiation,  deduce  that 

6{2KJ7r)*ns*{2Kxlw)  =  6cosec*a;  +  4  {(1 +F)  (2^/«-)2-  1}  cosec2^ 
+  64  ( 1  +  P)  A'3  ( A' -  ^)  TT-"  -  32 ;{;2  j:4  ^-4 

-32  i  r^{4(l+F)A:2.-2-n2}2'"^^. 

n=l  *■      If 

Shew  also  that,  when  \  I{x)\<^itI(t), 

3/o/r   /   N      "     fl+^'       {2n  +  lY  /  TT  VI   27ry^+Hin(2n  +  l)^ 

(Jacobi.) 

58.  Shew  that,  if  a  be  the  semi-major  axis  of  an  eUipse  whose  eccentricity  is  sin  ^v, 
the  perimeter  of  the  eUipse  is 

(Ramanujan,  Quarterly/  Journal,  XLV.) 

59.  Deduce  from  example  19  of  Chapter  xxi  that 

T>      Qf,        -/r'-'  +  dn^  wdn.3?t  ^^^.pcn^w  cnSw 

A;2cn3  2tt=- — rx^ — s :i — ,        an^2u=~ — j- — n ;r— . 

l+fc^  sn^  u  sn  3m  1  +  «■'  sn-*  %  sn  3% 

(Trinity,  1882.) 

60.  Shew  that  the  primitive  of 

||={|Psn2.-i(l+F)}^. 

is  u  =  {m^{C-z)cu^{C-z)dni{C-z)}-^{A+Bsn''^{C-z)}, 

where  A  and  B  are  arbitrary  constants  and  C=2K+iK'. 

(Jamet,  Comptes  Rendus,  cxi.) 

[See   also  Brioschi,  Comptes  Rendus,  lxxxvi.      If  v  be  written   for  z-2K—iK'  the 
equation  becomes 

of  which  the  corresponding  solution,  v,^{i^' {\v))  *{J^i^(|i;)  +  5i},  was  given  in  1880 
by  Halphen,  Memoires  par  divers  savants,  xxvrii.  (i),  p.   105. 

The  equation  is  a  special  case  of  Lame's  equation 

(which  assumes  the  form  given  on  p.  199,  when  ^{v)  is  taken  as  a  new  independent 
variable);  this  equation  was  solved  in  1877,  for  integral  values  of  n,  by  Hermite  (who 
used  Jacobian  elliptic  functions),  Stir  quelques  apflications  des  fonctions  elliptiques 
{Comptes  Rendus,  Lxxxv.,  ijublished  separately,  1885).  The  corresponding  solutions  of 
the  equation  with  Weierstrassian  fiuictions  are  given  by  Halphen,  Fonctions  elliptiques, 
II.,  and  also  by  Forsyth,  Differential  Equations,  iv.] 


APPENDIX 

THE  ELEMENTARY  TRANSCENDENTAL  FUNCTIONS 

A'l.     On  certain  results  assumed  in  Chapters  I-IV. 

It  was  convenient,  in  the  first  four  chapters  of  this  work,  to  assume  some  of  the 
properties  of  the  elementary  transcendental  functions,  namely  the  exponential,  logarithmic 
and  circular  functions ;  it  was  also  convenient  to  make  use  of  a  number  of  results  which 
the  reader  would  be  prepared  to  accept  intuitively  by  reason  of  his  familiarity  with  the 
geometrical  representation  of  complex  numbers  by  means  of  points  in  a  plane. 

To  take  two  instances,  (i)  it  was  assumed  (§  2'7)  that  liin  (exp2)  =  exp(lim0),  and 
(ii)  the  geometrical  concept  of  an  angle  in  the  Argand  diagram  made  it  appear  plausible 
that  the  argument  of  a  complex  number  was  a  many-valued  function,  possessing  the 
property  that  any  two  of  its  values  differed  by  an  integer  mviltiple  of  'Hn. 

The  assumption  of  results  of  the  first  type  was  clearly  illogical ;  it  was  also  illogical  to 
base  arithmetical  results  on  geometrical  reasoning.  For,  in  order  to  put  the  foundations 
of  geometry  on  a  satisfactory  basis,  it  is  not  only  desirable  to  employ  the  axioms  of 
arithmetic,  but  it  is  also  necessary  to  utilise  a  further  set  of  axioms  of  a  more  definitely 
geometrical  character,  concerning  properties  of  points,  straight  lines  and  planes*.  And, 
further,  the  arithmetical  theory  of  the  logarithm  of  a  complex  number  appears  to  be 
a  necessary  preliminary  to  the  development  of  a  logical  theory  of  angles. 

Apart  from  this,  it  seems  unsatisfactory  to  the  aesthetic  taste  of  the  mathematician  to 
employ  one  branch  of  mathematics  as  an  essential  constituent  in  the  structure  of  another ; 
particularly  when  the  former  has,  to  some  extent,  a  material  basis  whereas  the  latter 
is  of  a  purely  abstract  nature  t. 

The  reasons  for  pursuing  the  somewhat  illogical  and  unaesthetic  procedure,  adopted  in 
the  earlier  part  of  this  work,  were,  firstly,  that  the  properties  of  the  elementary  transcen- 
dental functions  were  required  gradually  in  the  course  of  Chapter  ii,  and  it  seemed 

*  It  is  not  our  object  to  give  any  account  of  the  foundations  of  geometry  in  this  work.  They 
are  investigated  by  various  writers,  such  as  Whitehead,  Axioms  of  Projective  Geovietry  (Cambridge 
Tracts)  and  Mathews,  Projective  Geometry.  A  perusal  of  Chapters  i,  xx,  xxii  and  xxv  of  the 
latter  work  will  convince  the  reader  that  it  is  even  more  laborious  to  develop  geometry  in  a 
logical  manner,  from  the  minimum  number  of  axioms,  than  it  is  to  evolve  the  theory  of  the 
circular  functions  by  purely  analytical  methods.  A  complete  account  of  the  elements  both  of 
arithmetic  and  of  geometry  has  been  given  by  Whitehead  and  Kussell,  Principia  Mathematica. 

+  Cf.  Merz,  History  of  European  Thought  in  the  Nineteenth  Century,  Vol.  ii.  pp.  631  (note  2) 
and  707  (note  1),  where  a  letter  from  Weierstrass  to  Schwarz  is  quoted.  See  also  Sylvester, 
Matli.  Papers,  m.  p.  50. 

W.    M.   A.  34 


530  APPENDIX 

undesirable  that  the  courae  of  a  general  development  of  the  various  infinite  processes 
should  be  frequently  interrupted  in  order  to  prove  theorems  (with  which  the  reader  was, 
in  all  probability,  already  familiar)  concerning  a  single  particular  function ;  and,  secondly, 
that  (in  connexion  with  the  assumption  of  results  based  on  geometrical  considerations) 
a  purely  arithmetical  mode  of  development  of  Chapters  l-iv,  deriving  no  help  or  illus- 
trations from  geometrical  processes,  would  have  very  greatly  increased  the  difficulties  of 
the  reader  unacquainted  with  the  methods  and  the  spirit  of  the  analyst. 

A'll.     Summary  of  the  Appendix. 

The  general  course  of  the  Appendix  is  as  follows : 

In  §§  A'2-A*22,  the  exponential  function  is  defined  by  a  power  series.  From  this 
definition,  combined  with  results  contained  in  Chapter  ii,  are  derived  the  elementary 
properties  (apart  from  the  periodic  properties)  of  this  function.  It  is  then  easy  to  deduce 
corresponding  properties  of  logarithms  of  positive  numbers  (§§  A"3-A'33). 

Next,  the  sine  and  cosine  are  defined  by  power  series  from  which  follows  the  connexion 
of  these  functions  with  the  exponential  function.  A  brief  sketch  of  the  manner  in  which 
the  formulae  of  elementary  trigonometry  may  be  derived  is  then  given  (§§  A*4-A"42). 

The  results  thus  obtained  render  it  possible  to  discuss  the  periodicity  of  the  exponential 
and  circular  functions  hj  purely  arithmetical  methods  {^^  A"5,  A'51). 

In  §§  A'52-A"522,  we  consider,  substantially,  the  continuity  of  the  inverse  circular 
functions.  When  these  functions  have  been  investigated,  the  theory  of  logarithms  of 
complex  numbers  (§  A '6)  presents  no  further  difficulty. 

Finally,  in  §  A'7,  it  is  shewn  that  an  angle,  defined  in  a  purely  analytical  manner, 
possesses  properties  which  are  consistent  with  the  ordinary  concept  of  an  angle,  based  on 
our  experience  of  the  material  world. 

It  will  be  obvious  to  the  reader  that  we  do  not  profess  to  give  a  complete  account  of 
the  elementary  transcendental  functions,  but  we  have  confined  ourselves  to  a  brief  sketch 
of  the  logical  foundations  of  the  theory*.  The  developments  have  been  given  by  writers 
of  various  treatises,  such  as  Hobson,  Plane  Trigonometry  ;  Hardy,  A  course  of  Pure 
Mathematics  ;  and  Bromwich,  Theory  of  Infinite  Series. 

A*12.     A  logical  order  of  development  of  the  elements  of  Analysis. 

The  reader  will  find  it  instructive  to  read  Chapters  i-iv  and  the  Appendix  a  second 
time  in  the  following  order : 

Chapter  i  (omitting  f  all  of  §  1*5  except  the  first  two  paragraphs). 

Chapter  ii  to  the  end  of  §  2-61  (omitting  the  examples  in  §§  2-31-2-61). 

Chapter  in  to  the  end  of  §  3-34  and  §§  3-5-3-73. 

The  Appendix,  §§  A-2-A-6  (omitting  §§  A-32,  A-33). 

Chapter  ii,  the  examples  of  §§  2'31-2'61. 

Chapter  iii,  5$5<  3-341-3-4. 

Chapter  iv,  inserting  §§  A-32,  A-33,  A-7  after  §  4-13. 

Chapter  ii,  ^§  2-7-2-82. 

^  In  writing  the  Appendix,  frequent  reference  has  been  made  to  the  article  on  Algebraic 
Analysis  in  the  Encyldopildie  der  Math.  Wissenschaften  by  Pringsheim  and  Faber,  to  the  same 
article  translated  and  revised  by  Molk  for  the  Encyclopedic  des  Sciences  Math.,  and  to  Tannery, 
Fonctions  d'une  Variable  reelle. 

t  The  properties  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  number  are  not  required  in  the  text  before 
Chapter  v. 


A-ll-A'21]        THE   ELEMENTARY   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  531 

He  should  try  thus  to  convince  himself  that  (in  that  order)  it  is  possible  to  elaborate 
a  purely  arithmetical  development  of  the  subject,  in  which  the  graphic  and  familiar 
language  of  geometry*  is  to  be  regarded  as  merely  conventional. 

A  •2.     The  exponential  function  ex^  z. 

The  exponential  function,  of  a  complex  variable  z,  is  defined  by  the  series  t 

z       z^       :^  cc     2" 

exp.  =  l+-  +  _  +  _+...=l+^2^-. 

This  series  converges  absolutely  for  all  values  of  z  (real  and  complex)  by  D'Alembert's 
ratio  test  (§  2*36)  since    lim   |(2/n)|  =  0<l ;  so  the  definition  is  valid  for  all  values  of  z. 

Further,  the  series  converges  uniformly  throughout  any  bounded  domain  of  values  of  z ; 
for,  if  the  domain  be  such  that  | « |  ^  ^  when  z  is»in  the  domain,  then 

|(«»/%!)|$^/to!, 
and  the  unifoi-mity  of  the  convergence  is  a  consequence  of  the  test  of  Weierstrass  (§  3-34), 
by  reason  of  the  convergence  of  the  series  1+2    {R^jn  !),  in  which  the  terms  are  indepen- 

n=l 

dent  of  z. 

Moreover,  since,  for  any  fixed  value  of  n,  z'^jn !  is  a  continuous  function  of  z,  it  follows 
from  §  3*32  that  the  exponential  fvmction  is  continuous  for  all  values  of  z ;  and  hence 
(cf.  §  3'2),  if  2  be  a  variable  which  tends  to  the  limit  f,  we  have 

lim  exp  z  =  exp  f .  . 

A*21.     The  addition-theorem  for  the  exponential  function,  and  its  consequences. 

From  Cauchy's  theorem  on  multiplication  of  absolutely  convergent  series  (§  2-53),  it 
follows  that  J 

(exp.0(exp^,)  =  (l  +  |5^  +  |-;  +  ...)(l+|?+|-'  +  ...) 

=  1  +  ^^+ 2l +  ••• 

=  exp(2i+22),  • 

so  that  exp(zj+02)  can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  exponential  functions  of  z^  and  of  ^2  by 
the  formula 

exp  (%+32)  =  (exp  zi)  (exp  Zj)- 

*  E.g.  'a  point,'  for  'an  ordered  number-pair,'  'the  circle  of  unit  radius  with  centre  at  the 
origin'  for  'the  set  of  ordered  number-pairs  {x,  y)  which  satisfy  the  condition  x^-t-y^  —  i^'  <tijg 
points  of  a  straight  line '  for  '  the  set  of  ordered  number-pairs  [x,  y)  which  satisfy  a  relation  of 
the  type  Ax  +  Bij  +  C=Q,'  and  so  on. 

t  It  was  formerly  customary  to  define  expz  as    lim   (  l-f--  )  ,  cf.  Gauchy,  Cours  cC Analyse,  i. 

p.  167.  Cauchy  {ibid.  pp.  168,  309)  also  derived  the  properties  of  the  function  from  the  series, 
but  his  investigation  when  z  is  not  rational  is  incomplete.  See  also  Schloinilcli,  Handhuch  der 
dig.  Analysis  (1889),  pp.  29,  178,  246.  Hardy  has  pointed  out  (Math.  Gazette,  iii.  p.  284)  that 
the  limit  definition  has  many  disadvantages. 

X  The  reader  will  at  once  verify  tliat  the  general  term  in  the  product  series  is 

(■2l"  +  nCl  ^l"^'  Z2  +  n^\  ^l"~^  22''  +  . . .  +  Z2")/"  !  =  (^1  +  ^i)"/"  !  • 

34—2 


532  APPENDIX 

This  result  is  known  as  the  addition-theorem  for  the  exponential  function.  From  it, 
we  see  by  induction  that 

(exp  2i)  (exp  22) . .  •  (exp  2„)  =  exp  (21  +  ^2  + . . .  +  2„), 
and,  in  particular, 

{exp  z)  {exp  ( -  2)}  =  exp  0  =  1. 

From  the  last  equation,  it  is  apparent  that  there  is  no  value  of  2  for  which  exp  2  =  0; 
for,  if  there  were  such  a  value  of  2,  since  exp  ( -  2)  would  exist  for  this  value  of  2,  we 
should  have  0=1. 

It  also  follows  that,  when  x  is  real,  exp  *  >  0  ;  for,  from  the  series  definition,  exp  ^  ^  1 
when  x'^O;  and,  when  x  ^  0,  exp  x=  1/exp  ( -  ^)>0. 

Further,  exp  x  is  an  increasing  function  of  the  real  variable  x  ;  for,  if  ^  >  0, 
exp  {x  +  k)-  exp  x  =  exp  x .  {exp  ^  —  1}  >  0, 
because  exp x>0  and  exp  ^ >  1. 

Also,  since  {expA-  l}/A=H-(A/2  !)  +  (A2/3  !)  +  ... , 

and  the  series  on  the  right  is  seen  (by  the  methods  of  §  A'2)  to  be  continuous  for  all 
values  of  A,  we  have 

lim  {expA— 1}/A  =  1, 

,  c?exp2      ,.      exp  (2  +  A)  —  exp  2 

and  so  -j       =  bm — ^ ,        — ^— =exp2. 

dz         h^o  "- 

A '22.      Various  properties  of  the  exponential  function. 

Returning  to  the  formula  (exp2i)  (exp22) ...  (expz„)  =  exp(2i+22  +  -.-+'2^n)>  we  see  that, 
when  n  is  a  positive  integer, 

(exp  2)"-  =  exp  {nz), 
and  (exp  2) ~"  =  l/(exp 2)"=  1/exp  (712)  =  exp  (- ^2). 

In  particular,  taking  2=1  and  writing  e  in  place  of  exp  1  =  271828...,  we  see  that, 
when  m  is  an  integer,  positive  or  negative, 

e™  =  exp ?«-=!+  {mjl !)  +  (?/i2/2  !)  +  .... 

Also,  if  p.  be  any  rational  number  ( —plq,  where  p  and  q  are  integers,  q  being  positive) 

(exp  /x)«  =  exp  \iq  =  exp^  =  e'", 

so  that  the  g'th  power  of  exp/i  is  e^;  that  is  to  say,  exp /a  is  a  vahie  of  eP^i  =  e'^,  and  it  is 
obviously  (§  A'21)  the  real  positive  value. 

If  X  be  an  irrational-real  number  (defined  by  a  section  in  which  aj  and  ag  ^^6  typical 
members  of  the  Z-class  and  the  j^-class  respectively),  the  irrational  power  e*  is  mostly 
simply  defined  as  exp  x  ;  we  thus  have,  for  all  real  values  of  .r,  rational  and  irrational, 

an  equation  first  given  by  Newton*. 

It  is,  therefore,  legitimate  to  write  e^  for  exp;p  when  x  is  real,  and  it  is  customary  to 
write  e^  for  exp  2  when  2  is  com])lex.  The  function  e'  (which,  of  course,  must  not  be 
regarded  as  being  a  power  of  e),  thus  defined,  is  subject  to  the  ordinary  laws  of  indices,  viz. 

*  De  Analysi  per  aeqiiat.  num.  term.  inf.  (written  before  1669,  but  not  published  till  1711) ; 
it  was  also  given  both  by  Newton  and  by  Leibniz  in  letters  to  Oldenburg  in  1676 ;  it  was  first 
published  by  Wallis  in  1685  in  his  Treatise  on  Algebra,  p.  343.  The  equation  when  x  is  irrational 
was  explicitly  stated  by  Schlomilch,  Algehraische  Analysis  (1889),  p.  182. 


A-22-A-31]        THE   ELEMENTARY   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  633 

[Note.  Tannery,  Legons  d'Algibre  et  d' Analyse  (1906),  i.  p.  45,  practically  defines  e*, 
when  X  is  irrational,  as  the  only  number  X  such  that  e"*  ^X ^e^^,  for  every  aj  and  Og. 
From  the  definition  we  have  given  it  is  easily  seen  that  such  a  unique  number  exists. 
For  exp  x  {  =  X)  satisfies  the  inequality,  and  if  X'  {^X)  also  did  so,  then 

exp  flg  —  exp  ai  =  e"2  -  e"i  ^  I  X' —  X  i , 
so  that,  since  the  exponential  function  is  continuous,  a^  —  a^  cannot  be  chosen  arbitrarily 
small,  and  so  {a\,  a^)  does  not  define  a  section.] 

A*3.     Logarithms  of  positive  numbers*. 

It  has  been  seen  (§§  A'2,  A'21)  that,  when  x  is  real,  exp  a;  is  a  positive  continuous 
increasing  function  of  x,  and  obviously  exp x-*-  +  oo  as  x-*'+  <x> ,  while 

exp:p=l/exp(-ar)-»-0  as  x-^  —  cc. 
If,  then,  a  be  any  positive  number,  it  follows  from  §  3"63  that  the  equation  in  x, 

ex]ix=a, 
has  one  real  root  and  only  one.     This  root  (which  is,  of  course,  a  function  of  a)  will  be 
written  t  Logg  a  or  simply  Log  a ;  it  is  called  the  Logarithm  of  the  positive  number  a. 

Since  a  one-one  correspondence  has  been  established  between  x  and  a,  and  since  a  is 
an  increasing  function  of  x,  x  must  be  an  increasing  function  of  a  ;  that  is  to  say,  the 
Logarithm  is  an  increasing  function. 

Example.     Deduce  from  §  A '21  that  Log  a  +  Log  6= Log  a6. 

A'31.     The  continuity  of  the  Logarithm. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that,  when  a  is  positive.  Log  a  is  a  continuous  function  of  a. 

Let  Loga=a;,     Log(a  +  A)  =  .r+^, 

so  that  e^  =  a,     e==  +  *^  =  a  +  A,     H-(/i/a)  =  e*. 

First  suppose  that  A  >  0,  so  that  ^  >  0,  and  then 

]+(/i/a)  =  l  +  /&  +  |P+...>l4-;{;, 
and  so  0  <  /{;  <  A/a, 

that  is  to  say  0  <  Log  (a  +  A)  -  Log  a  <  hja. 

Hence,  h  being  positive.  Log  (a  +  Zi)  — Loga  can  be  made  arbitrarily  small  by  taking  h 
suflSciently  small. 

Next,  suppose  that  A<0,  so  that  ^•<0,  and  then  al{a  +  h)  =  e~^. 

Hence  (taking  0  <  —  A  <  |a,  as  is  obviously  permissible)  we  get 

al{a  +  h)  =  \  +  {-k)  +  \B-\- ...  >\-k, 

and  so  -k<  -l  +  a/(a  +  /i)=  -h/(a  +  h)<  -2h/a. 

Therefore,  whether  h  be  positive  or  negative,  if  e  be  an  arbitrary  positive  number  and 
if.|  A  I  be  taken  less  than  both  ia  and  iae,  we  have 

I  Log  (a  +  A)  -  Log  a  I  <  f , 

and  so  the  condition  for  continuity  (§  3*2)  is  satisfied. 

*  Many  mathematicians  define  the  Logarithm  by  the  integral  formula  given  in  §  A-3'2.  The 
reader  should  consult  a  memoir  by  Hurwitz  (Math.  Ann.  lxx.)  on  the  foundations  of  the  theory 
of  the  logarithm. 

t  This  is  in  agreement  with  the  notation  of  most  text-books,  iu  which  Log  denotes  the 
principal  value  (see  §  A-6)  of  the  logarithm  of  a  complex  nnmber. 


534  APPENDIX 

A*32.     Differentiation  of  the  Logarithm. 

Retaining  the  notation  of  §  A'31,  we  see,  from  results  there  proved,  that,  if  A^O 
(a  being  fixed),  then  also  ^-*-0.     Therefore,  when  a>0, 

c^Loga_  V  ^        _  1  _  1 

da     ~  jc-».Q^'''^^-^~ «^~ ct' 

Since  Log  1  =0,  we  have,  by  §  4'13  example  3, 

(a 
Loga=  I    t~^dt. 

A '33.     The  expansion  of  Log(l  +  a)  in  powers  of  a. 
From  §  A*32  we  have 

Log(H-a)=  j"'{l  +  t)--^dt 

=  r{i-t+t^- ...  +(-)»-ir-i+(-)"p(i+o-»}f^i; 

=  a-ia^  +  W-  ...+(-)"-^  ^a"  +  ^„, 
where  Rn^i-^  j"'t''{l  +  t)-^dt. 

Now,  if  -  1<  a  <  1,  we  have 

rial 
l^ni^l       t"{l-\a\)-^dt 

=  |ai"  +  i{(?i  +  l)(l-|a|)}-i 
-••0  as  ri  -»  00  . 
Hence,  when  —  1  < a <  1,  Log (l+a)  can  be  expanded  into  the  convergent  series* 

Log(l+a)  =  a-|aHJa^-  ...  =  2  (-)»-ia'V'«- 

If  a=  +  l, 

\Rn\=l    f^il +  t)-^dt<  I    t'^dt  =  {n-\- 1)  -  ^ -^  0  a,s  n-*  CO, 
Jo  Jo 

so  the  expansion  is  valid  when  a=  + 1  ;  it  is  not  valid  when  a=  -1. 
Example.     Shew  that  lim   (  1  +  -  )  =  e. 

[We  have  Jin.^  ,.log  (l  +  i)  =   \im^  (i  -  i.  +  2_  _  ...) 

=  1, 
and  the  result  required  follows  from  the  result  of  §  A-2  that  lim  e^  =  e^] 

A*4.     The  definition  of  the  sine  and  cosine. 

The  functions  +  sinz  and  cosz  are  defined  analytically  by  means  of  power  series,  thus 

^3  2'')  00     (  —  )"  s2"  + 1 

sinz=z--  +--...=^^2^   (2n+l)!  ' 

^2  2*  ^    (  —  )"  S^" 

cos2  =  l-  — +  -—- ...=1+    2  ™vr    ; 
2!      4!  „=i    (270! 

these  series  converge  absolutely  for  all  values  of  z  (real  and  complex)  by  §  2"36,  and  so  the 
definitions  are  valid  for  all  values  of  z. 

*  This  method  of  obtaining  the  Logarithmic  expansion  is,  in  effect,  due  to  Wallis,  Phil. 
Trans,  ii.   (1668),  p.  754. 

+  These  series  were  given  by  Newton,  Be  Analysi...  (1711),  see  §  A-22  footnote.  The  other 
trigonometrical  functions  are  defined  in  the  manner  with  which  the  reader  is  famiUar,  as 
quotients  and  reciprocals  of  sines  and  cosines. 


A-32-A*5]  THE   ELEMENTARY   TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  535 

On  comparing  these  series  with  the  exponential  series,  it  is  apparent  that  the  sine  and 
cosine  are  not  essentially  new  functions,  but  they  can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  exponential 
functions  by  the  equations* 

2i  sin  2  =  exp  (iz)  —  exp  ( -  iz),     2  cos  z = exp  {iz)  +  exp  (  -  iz). 

It  is  obvious  that  sin  z  and  cos  z  are  odd  and  even  functions  of  z  respectively  ;  that  is 
to  say 

sin  {  —  z)=—  sin  z,     cos  ( -  2)  =  cos  z. 

A '41.     The  fundamental  properties  of  sin  2  and  cos  2. 

It  may  be  proved,  just  as  in  the  case  of  the  exponential  function  (§  A*2),  that  the  series 
for  sin  2  and  cos  2  converge  uniformly  in  any  bounded  domain  of  values  of  2,  and  con- 
sequently that  sin  2  and  cos  2  are  continuous  functions  of  2  for  all  values  of  2. 

Further,  it  may  be  proved  in  a  similar  manner  that  the  series 

3!'''5!     ••• 

defines  a  continuous  function  of  z  for  all  values  of  2,  and,  in  particular,  this  function 
is  continuous  at  2=0,  and  so  it  follows  that 

lim  (2~isin2)  =  l. 

A*42.     The  addition-theorems  for  sin  2  and  cos  2. 

By  using  Euler's  equations  (§  A'4),  it  is  easy  to  prove  from  properties  of  the  exponential 
function  that 

sm{zi  +  Z2)  =  smzi  cos  22  + cos  21  sin  22 

and  cos  {zi  +  z>>)  —  cos  21  cos  22  —  sin  2i  sin  22 ; 

these  results  are  known  as  the  addition-theorems  for  sin  2  and  cos  2. 

It  may  also  be  proved,  by  using  Euler's  equations,  that 

sin^z-\-coii^z=l. 

By  means  of  this  result,  sin  (21 +  22)  can  be  expressed  as  an  algebraic  function  of  sin^i 
and  sin  22,  while  008(21  +  22)  can  similarly  be  expressed  as  an  algebraic  function  of  cos2i 
and  cos  22 ;  so  the  addition-formulae  may  be  regarded  as  addition-theorems  in  the  strict 
sense  (cf.  §§  20-3,  22-732  note). 

By  differentiating  Euler's  equations,  it  is  obvious  that 

ds'niz  dcosz 

J =  cos  2,  -. =  —  SHI  z. 

dz  dz 

Example.     Shew  that 

sin  22  =  2  sin  2  cos  2,     cos  22  =  2  cos^  2  -  1 ; 
these  results  are  known  as  the  duplication-formulae. 

A'5.     The  periodicity  of  the  exponential  function. 

If  2i  and  22  are  such  that  exp  21  =  exp  22,  then,  multiplying  both  sides  of  the  equation  by 
exp  (-22),  we  get  exp  (21- 22)  =1 ;  and  writing  y  for  21-20,  we  see  that,  for  all  values  of  2 
and  all  integral  values  of  n, 

exp  (2  +  ny)  =  exp  2 .  (exp  y)"  =  exp  z. 

*  These  equations  were  derived  by  Euler  [they  were  given  in  a  letter  to  Johann  Bernoulli  in 
1740  and  published  in  the  Hist.  Acad.  Berlin,  v.  (1749),  p.  279]  from  the  geometrical  definitions 
of  the  sine  and  cosine,  upon  which  the  theory  of  the  circular  functions  was  then  universally 
based. 


536  APPENDIX 

The  exponential  function  is  then  said  to  have  period  y,  since  the  effect  of  increasing 
z  by  y,  or  by  an  integral  multiple  thereof,  does  not  affect  the  value  of  the  function. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  such  numbers  y  (other  than  zero)  actually  exist,  and  that  all 
the  numbers  y,  possessing  the  property  just  described,  are  comprised  in  the  expression 

2;i»ri,  {n=±l,    ±2,    ±3,  ...) 

where  tt  is  a  certain  positive  number*  which  happens  to  be  greater  than  2  v/2  and  less 
than  4. 

A'51.      The  solution  of  the  equation  exp  y=  1. 

Let  7=0  +  1^,  where  a  and  /3  are  real ;  then  the  problem  of  solving  the  equation 
expy=l  is  identical  with  that  of  solving  the  equation 

expo.  expi/3=l. 
Comparing  the  real  and  imaginary  parts  of  each  side  of  this  equation  we  have 

expo,  cos /3=1,     expo,  sin /3=0. 
Squaring  and  adding  these  equations,  and  using  the  identity  cos'^/3  +  sin2;3=  1,  we  get 

exp2a=l. 

Now  if  a  were  positive,  exp  2a  would  be  greater  than  1,  and  if  a  were  negative,  exp  2a 
would  be  less  than  1  ;  and  so  the  only  possible  value  for  a  is  zero. 

It  follows  that  cos/3=l,     sin/3=0. 

Now  the  equation  sin/3  =  0  is  a  necessary  consequence  of  the  equation  cos^=l,  on 
account  of  the  identity  cos^/S  +  sin^/S^l.  It  is  therefore  sufficient  to  consider  solutions 
(if  such  solutions  exist)  of  the  equation  cosi3  =  l. 

Instead,  however,  of  considering  the  equation  cos/3=l,  it  is  more  convenient  to 
consider  the  equation  t  cos;r=0. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  the  equation  cos^'  =  0  has  one  root,  and  only  one,  lying 
between  0  and  2,  and  that  this  root  exceeds  v'2  ;  to  prove  these  statements,  we  make  use 
of  the  following  considerations  : 

(I)     The  fvmction  cos*'  is  certainly  continuous  in  the  range  0  ^^^2. 

(II)     When  0  ^  .r  ^  ^2,  we  have  + 

and  so,  when  Q^x^  J2,  cos x > 0. 
(Ill)     The  value  of  cos  2  is 

'-^+5-|i(i-.'r8)-,^,(i-n^)--=-i--«'- 


(IV)     When0<.r^2, 
sin  X 


,      x'^\        X*   ( ^       x"^  \  T      •^^^  1 


and  so,  when  0  ^  a*  ^  2,  sin  x  ^  \x. 

*  The  fact  that  tt  is  an  irrational  number,  whose  value  is  3-14159...,  is  irrelevant  to  the 
present  investigation.  For  an  account  of  attempts  at  determining  the  value  of  tt,  concluding 
with  a  proof  of  the  theorem  that  tt  satisfies  no  algebraic  equation  with  rational  coefficients,  see 
Hobson's  monograph  Squaring  the  Circle. 

t  If  cosx=:0,  it  is  an  immediate  consequence  of  tlie  duplication-formulae  that  cos  2a;  =  -1 
and  thence  that  cos4.r  =  l,  so,  if  a;  is  a  solution  of  cos  a;  =  0,  4a;  is  a  solution  of  cos/3  =  l. 

X  The  symbol  2j  may  be  replaced  by  >  except  when  x  =  j2  in  the  first  place  where  it  occurs, 
and  except  when  .x-  =  0  in  the  other  places. 


A'51,  A-52]        THE   ELEMENTARY  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  537 

It  follows  from  (II)  and  (III)  combined  with  the  results  of  (I)  and  of  §  3 '63  that  the 
equation  cos.r  =  0  has  at  least  one  root  in  the  range  v'2<^<2,  and  it  has  no  root  in  the 
range  0^^^^2. 

Further,  there  is  not  more  than  one  root  in  the  range  x/2<a'<2;  for,  suppose  that 
there  were  two,  .»i  and  X2  (^2  >  a;i) ;  then  0  <  ^^2  -  ajj  <  2  -  v'2<  1,  and 

sin  (x2  -  ^i) = sin  1C2  cos  jti  —  sin  Xi  cos  Xz = 0, 

and  this  is  incompatible  with  (IV)  which  shews  that  sin (a^g -x^'^\ {x^  —  x^). 

The  equation  cos  ^=0  therefore  has  one  and  only  one  root  lying  between  0  and  2.  This 
root  lies  between  «y2  and  2,  and  it  is  called  \  n ;  and,  as  stated  in  the  footnote  to  §  A"5,  its 
actual  value  happens  to  be  1*57079 

From  the  addition-formulae,  it  may  be  proved  at  once  by  induction  that 

cos  w  TT  =  ( —  1 )",     sin  nir  =  0, 
where  n  is  any  integer. 

In  particular,  cos  2nir  =  1,  where  n  is  any  integer. 

Moreover,  there  is  no  value  of  3  (other  than  those  values  of  the  form  inn)  for  which 
008/3  =  1;  for  if  there  were  such  a  value,  it  must  be  real*  and  so  we  can  choose  the 
integer  m  so  that 

—  w  ^2TO7r  —^<n. 

We  then  have 

sin  I  WITT  -  iiS  I  =  ±  sin  (tott  -  J^)  =  ±  sin  ^/3=  ±  2  ~  ^  (1  -  cos  /3)*=0, 
and  this  is  inconsistent t  with  sin  |  mTr  —  ^/3  |  ^  ^  |  win-  — ^^  |  unless  ^=2m7r. 

Consequently  the  numbers  2??jr,  (w=0,  ±1,  ±2,...),  and  no  others,  have  their  cosines 
equal  to  unity. 

It  follows  that  a  positive  number  n-  exists  such  that  exp^  has  period  2iTi  and  that 
exp  z  has  no  period  fundamentally  distinct  from  27ri. 

The  formulae  of  elementary  trigonometry  concerning  the  periodicity  of  the  circular 
functions,  with  which  the  reader  is  already  acquainted,  can  now  be  proved  by  analytical 
methods  without  any  difficulty. 

Example  1.     Shew  that  sin  |n-  is  equal  to  1,  not  to  —  1. 

Example  2.     Shew  that  tan x>x  when  0<.x< ^tt. 

[For  cos  ^  >  0  and 

00         ^n-l 

„=i(4»-l) 

and  every  term  in  the  series  is  positive.] 

x'^      x^        x^  .  .  25  X'^      x^ 

Example  3.     Shew  that  1  —  tt  +  :t7  —  ^^t^k  ^^  positive  when  x  =  --i,  and  that  l—\+7r- 

z       24      7aU  lb  2       24 

vanishes  when  .r  =  (6  — 2^/3)^  =  1"  5924...  ;  and  deduce  that  J 

3-125  <7r<  3-185. 

A'52.     The  solution  of  a  pair  of  tngonometneal  equations. 
Let  X,  ju.  be  a  pair  of  real  numbers  such  that  X'^  +  /li^=  1. 

*  The  equation  cos/3=l  implies  that  exp  t/3=l,  and  we  have  seen  that  this  equation  has  no 
complex  roots. 

t  The  inequality  is  true  by  (IV)  since  0  ^  |  thtt-  J/3  i  ■$  |7r<2. 

X  See  De  Morgan,  A  Budget  of  Paradoxes,  pp.  316  et  seq.,  for  reasons  for  proving  that 
7r>3i. 


sin:r  — ;?;cos:r=  2  tt- tt-;  ^  4?i  -  2  -  ■, ~[  , 

4n  +  lj  ' 


538  APPENDIX 

Then,  if  X4=  - 1,  the  equations 

cos^=X,     Bin  x=fi 

have  an  infinity  of  solutions  of  which  one  and  only  one  lies  between*  —  n  and  tt. 

First,  let  k  and  /x  be  not  negative  ;  then  (§  3"63)  the  equation  cos^=X  has  at  least  one 
solution  Xi  such  that  O^J7^^|7r,  since  cos  0=1,  co8^  =  0.  The  equation  has  not  two 
solutions  in  this  range,  for  if  Xi  and  x.^  were  distinct  solutions  we  could  prove  (cf.  ^  A"51) 
that  sin  (^i  —  ^2)  =  0>  and  this  would  contradict  §  A"51  (IV),  since 

Further,  sin a^i=  4-/^/(1— cos2^i)= +v'(l  -\^)  =  fi,  so  ^j  is  a  solution  of  6of/i  equations. 

The  equations  have  no  solutions  in  the  ranges  (  — tt,  0)  and  (^rr,  tt)  since,  in  these 
ranges,  either  sin  a,'  or  cos^  is  negative.  Thus  the  equations  have  one  solution,  and  only 
one,  in  the  range  ( —  n,  tt). 

If  X  or  )u.  (or  both)  is  negative,  we  may  investigate  the  equations  in  a  similar  manner  ; 
the  details  are  left  to  the  reader. 

It  is  obvious  that,  if  x^  is  a  solution  of  the  equations,  so  is  Xi  +  2mT,  where  n  is  any 
integer,  and  so  the  equations  have  an  infinity  of  real  solutions. 

A '521.      The  principal  solution  of  the  trigonometrical  equations. 

The  unique  solution  of  the  equations  cos.r=X,  sin.r  =  ^  (where  X2  +  /i^  =  l)  which  lies 
between  —  tt  and  n  is  called  the  principal  solution-^,  and  any  other  solution  differs  from  it 
by  an  integer  multiple  of  27r. 

The  principal  value  %  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  number  ^  ( 4=  0)  can  now  be  defined 
analytically  as  the  principal  solution  of  the  equations 

\z\coii(li  =  R{z),     |s  I  sin  (^  =  7(2), 

and  then  if  z  =  \z\.  (cos 6-\-i sin 6), 

we  must  have  d  —  cji  +  2nn,  and  $  is  called  a  value  of  the  argument  of  2,  and  is  written 
arg2  (cf.  §  1*5). 

A'522.      The  continuity  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  variable. 

It  will  now  be  shewn  that  it  is  possible  to  choose  such  a  value  of  the  argument  6  (z),  of 
a  complex  variable  z,  that  it  is  a  continuous  function  of  z,  provided  that  z  does  not  pass 
through  the  value  zero. 

Let  zo  be  a  given  value  of  z  and  let  ^0  t)e  any  value  of  its  argument  ;  then,  to  prove  that 
6(z)  is  continuous  at  Zq,  it  is  sufficient  to  shew  that  a  number  di  exists  such  that  ^j  =  arg2i 
and  that  |  ^1  -  ^0  (  can  be  made  less  than  an  arbitrary  positive  number  e  by  giving  1 21  -  20  I 
any  value  less  than  some  positive  number  t]. 

Let  Zq = x^t  +  ii/o ,     ■^i  =  -^i  + '!?/ 1  • 

Also  let  1 2i  -  Zq  I  be  chosen  to  be  so  small  that  the  following  inequalities  are  satisfied  §  : 

(I)     I  .i"i  -  .To  I  <  -^  I  ^0  I )  provided  that  Xo  =t=  0, 
(II)     I  y  1  -  yo  !  <  i  1  .yo  I )  pro vided  that  3/0  +  0, 

(III)      l^-i-^ol  <ie|2u|,      \->/i-2/o\<h\^o\- 

*  If  X  =  -  1,   ±7r  are  solutions  and  there  are  no  others  in  the  range  ( -  tt,  tt). 

t  If  X=:  -  1,  we  take  +7r  as  the  principal  solution  ;  cf.  p.  9. 

X  The  term  principal  value  was  introduced  in  1845  by  Bjorling ;  see  the  Archiv  der  Math, 
unci  Phys.  (1)  ix.  (1847),  p.  408. 

§  (I)  or  (II)  respectively  is  simply  to  be  suppressed  in  the  case  when  (i)  X(,  =  0,  or  when 
(ii)  2/0-0. 


A-521-A-7]  THE   ELEMENTARY  TRANSCENDENTAL   FUNCTIONS  539 

From  (I)  and  (II)  it  follows  that  .roO^i  and  y^y^  are  not  negative,  and 

80  that  -^o^i  +  yo^i  ^  i  I  «o  I  ^. 

Now  let  that  value  of  di  be  taken  which  differs  from  6q  by  less  than  n ;  then  since 
^0  and  Xi  have  not  opposite  signs  and  y^  and  yi  have  not  opposite  signs*,  it  follows  from 
the  solution  of  the  equations  of  §  A-52  that  di  and  6^  differ  by  leas  than  ^rr. 

Now        .  tan(^i-^o)  =  '^"^'~'^''^", 

^o^i+yoyi 

and  80  (§  A'51  example  2), 

I  /}    z,  I  ^  Uo.yi--yi.yo  I 

''1  ~  t'o  ^  ; 

^o^i+yo^i 

^  l-^o(.yi-yo)-yo(^i-^o)l 
^•o^i  +yoyi 

=^  2  I  zo  TMko  I  •  I  yi  -^0  i  +  1 3/0  I .  I  ^1  -J^o  |}- 
But  I  ^0  I  ^  I  ■^o  I  and  also  I  ^o  I  <  i  ■^o  I  >  therefore 

|(9i-(9ol=$2|2o|~Mlyi-yo|  +  |.«'i-.«?ol}  <  «• 
Further,  if  we  take  \zi-Zq\  less  than  J  |  a:o  | ,  (if  ^o  =*=  0)  and  ^|yo  l»  (if  yo=t=0)  and  ie  |  Zq  |> 
the  inequalities  (I),  (II),  (III)  above  are  satisfied  ;   so  that  if  rj  be  the  smallest  of  the 
three  numberst  -11  ■3:*o  I,  i  i  ^o  h  jf  I  ■^^o  I?  "by  taking  |  2i  -^o  I  <  '7)  we  have  |  ^i-  ^o  I  <  «  !  and 
this  is  the  condition  that  6  {£)  should  be  a  continuous  function  of  the  complex  variable  z. 

A*6.     Logarithms  of  complex  numbers. 

The  number  (  is  said  to  be  a  logarithm  of  z  if  z  =  e^. 

To  solve  this  equation  in  f,  write  t=  !  +  *'?>  where  ^  and  rj  are  real ;  and  then  we  have 

z  =  e^  (cos  T)  ■\-  i  sin  rf). 

Taking  the  modulus  of  each  side,  we  see  that  |  a  |  =  e%  so  that  (§  A '3),  |  =  Log  \z\;  and 
then 

2=  1^1  (cos  7/ +1  sin  rj), 

so  that  T]  must  be  a  value  of  argz. 

The  logarithm  of  a  complex  number  is  consequently  a  many-valued  function,  and  it 
can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  more  elementary  functions  by  the  equation 

log  z  =  Log  z  +  i  arg  z. 

The  continuity  of  logz  (when  z^O)  follows  from  §  A"31  and  §  A'522,  since  \z\  is  a 
continuous  function  of  z. 

The  differential  coefficient  of  any  particular  branch  of  logz  (§  5*7)  may  be  determined 
as  in  §  A'32  ;  and  the  expansion  of  §  A'33  may  be  established  for  log  (1  +a)  when  |  a  |  <  1. 

Corollary.  If  a'  be  defined  to  mean  e'^''^'^,  a^  is  a  continuous  function  of  z  and  of  a 
when  a  =1=0. 

A'7.     The  analytical  definition  of  an  angle. 

Let  2i,  ^2)  h  ^^  three  complex  numbers  represented  by  the  points  Pi,  P.^,  P3  in  the 
Argand  diagram.  Then  the  angle  between  the  lines  (§  A"12,  footnote)  PiF^  and  P1P3  is 
defined  to  be  any  value  of  arg  (23  — ^j)  — arg  (Zi-Zi). 

*  The  geometrical  interpretation  of  these  conditions  is  merely  that  zq  and  zi  are  not  in 
different  quadrants  of  the  plane. 

t  If  any  of  these  numbers  is  zero,  it  is  to  be  omitted. 


540  APPENDIX 

It  will  now  be  shewn*  that  the  area  (defined  as  an  integral),  which  is  bounded  by  two 
radii  of  a  given  circle  and  the  arc  of  the  circle  terminated  by  the  radii,  is  proportional  to 
one  of  the  values  of  the  angle  between  the  radii,  so  that  an  angle  (in  the  analytical  sense) 
possesses  the  property  which  is  given  at  the  beginning  of  all  text-books  on  Trigonometry  t. 

Let  (^1,  _yi)  be  any  point  (both  of  whose  coordinates  are  positive)  of  the  cii'cle 
ifi+y'^  =  a^{a>0).  Let  6  be  the  principal  value  of  arg(^i  +  iyi),  so  that  0<^<-^7r. 
Then  the  area  bounded  by  OX  and  the  line  joining  (0,  0)  to  (.ri,  yx)  and  the  arc  of  the 


circle  joining  {xi,y-^  to  {a,  0)  is  I    f{x)  dx,  wherej 

Jo 

/ (x)  =  X  tan  6         {O^x^a  cos  6), 
f{x)  =  {ofi-x^)^      (a  cos  ^<a;^«), 
if  an  area  be  defined  as  meaning  a  suitably  chosen  integral  (cf.  p.  61). 

It  remains  to  be  proved  that  I    f{x)  dx  is  proportional  to  6. 

J  0 

/"a  racosB  Ca  , 

Now       I    f{x)dx=\  xi&uddx+l  {a?-x^y  dx 

Jo'  Jo  y  a  cose 

=  ^a=^sin^cos<9-f  I  I  \a^{a^~x^)~^  +  -j-x{a^  -  x'^)^\  dx 

=  ^a^r        {a^-x^)-^dx 

J  a  cos  6 

=  ^a^U\l-fiy^  dt-  r"^\l-fi)-^  dt\ 

on  writing  x^at  and  using  the  example  worked  out  on  p.  64. 

That  is  to  say,  the  area  of  the  sector  is  proportional  to  the  angle  of  the  sector.  To 
this  extent,  we  have  shewn  that  the  popular  conception  of  an  angle  is  consistent  with 
the  analytical  definition. 

*  The  proof  here  given  applies  only  to  acute  angles ;  the  reader  should  have  no  difficulty  in 
extending  the  result  to  angles  greater  than  ^w,  and  to  the  case  when  OX  is  not  one  of  the 
bounding  radii. 

t  Euclid's  definition  of  an  angle  does  not,  in  itself,  afford  a  measure  of  an  angle  ;  it  is  shewn 
in  treatises  on  Trigonometry  (of.  Hobson,  Plane  Trigonometry,  Chapter  i)  that  an  angle  is 
measured  by  twice  the  area  of  the  sector  which  the  angle  cuts  off  from  a  unit  circle  whose  centre 
is  at  the  vertex  of  the  angle. 

J  The  reader  will  easily  see  the  geometrical  interpretation  of  the  integral  by  drawing  a 
figure. 


LIST    OF    AUTHORS    QUOTED 

[The  numbers  refer  to  the  pages.     Initials  which  are  rarely  used  are 

given  in  italics] 


Abel,  N.  H.,  16,  17,  50,  57,  58,  205,  223,  224, 

347,  412,  422,  435,  489,  498,  505,  518 
Adamoff,  A.,  345,  348 
Adams,  J.  C,  126,  229,  325,  399 
Airey,  J.  E.,  371 
Aldis,  W.  S.,  371 
Alexeiewsky,  W.  P.,  258 
Amigues,  E.  P.  M.,  122 
Anding,  E.,  371 

Appell,  P.  E.,  274,  292,  294,  330,  393,  411 
Argand,  J.  R.,  9 

Barnes,  E.  W.,  128,  159,  230,  258,  273,  280, 

283,  290,  293,  320,  324,  332,  340,  341,  345, 

362 
Basset,  A.  B.,  366,  377 
Bateman,  H.,  224,  346,  392,  395 
Bauer,  G.,  327,  394 
Beau,  0.,  187 
Berger,  A.,  185 

Bernoulli,  Daniel  (1700-1782),  160,  350 
Bernoulli,  Jakob  (1654-1705),  126,  422,  455 
Bernoulli,  Joliaun  (1667-1748),  535 
Bertrand,  J.  L.  F.,  71 

Bessel,  F.  W.,  198,  335,  336,  350,  351,  355,  360 
Besso,  D.,  346 
Biermann,  W.   G.   A.,  447 
Binet,  J.  P.   M.,  242,  243,  244,  245,  247,  255, 

256,  257,  308 
Bjorling,  E.  G.,  538 
Blades,  E.,  396 
Bobek,  K.,  526 
Bocher,  M  ,  81,  197,  206,  215,  223,  224,  225, 

354 
Bolzano,  B.,'  13 
Bonnet,  P.  Ossian,  66,  161 
Borchardt,  C.  W.,  105,  448,  456 
Borel,  E.,  53,  108,  140,  141,  144,  154,  155,  159 
Bouquet,  J.  C,  448,  455,  480 
Bourget,  J.,  372,  389 
Bourguet,  L.,  240,  254,  255,  258 
Bridgeman,  P.  W.,  374 
Brioschi,  F.,  528 
Briot,  J.  A.  A.,  448,  455,  480 


Bromwioh,  T.  J.  I'a.,  10,  25,  26,  33,  38,  45, 
50,  59,  75,  80,  144,  156,  159,  236,  284, 
530 

Brouncker,  William  (Viscount),  16 

Burgess,  J.,  336 

Burkhardt,  H.  F.  K.  L.,  317,  392 

Burmann,  Heinrich,  129 

Burnside,  William,  450 

Burnside,  W.  S.,  206,  355,  446 

Cajori,  F.,  59,  60 

Callandreau,  O.,  358 

Cantor,  Georg  F.  L.  P.,  4,  161,  177,  180,  181 

Carda,  K.,  126 

Catalan,  E.  C,  326,  327 

Cauchy,  (Baron)  A.  L.,  13,  16,  21,  27,  29,  40, 
42,  59,  71,  77,  83,  85,  86,  91,  93,  96,  99, 
105,  119,  122,  123,  161,  257,  455,  531 

Cayley,  A.,  192,  292,  427,  432,  448,  480,  489, 
491,  501,  521,  523,  526 

Cesaro,  E.,  38,  39,  58,   155,   156 

Chapman,  S.,  viii,  159 

Charpit,  P.,  384 

Chartier,  J.,  72,  77 

Chree,  C,  374 

Christoffel,  E.  B.,  327 

Chrystal,  G.,  23 

Clausen,  T.,  292 

Clebsch,  R.  F.  A.,  448 

Corey,  S.  A.,  108 

Craig,  T.,  202 

Cunningham,  E.,  204,  347 

Curzon,  H.  E.  J.,  204,  345 

D'Alembert,  J.  le  Bond,  20,  22,   160 

Daniels,  A.  L.,  448 

Dantscher,  V.  von,  4,  10 

Darboux,  J.  G.,  43,  61,  96,  125 

De  Brun,  F.  D.,  450 

Debye,  P.,  362 

Dedekind,  J.   W.  Richard,  4,   10 

De  la  ValMe  Poussin,  Ch.  J.,  39,  59,  72,  73, 

80,  81,  108,  184 
De  Morgan,  A.,  23,  537 


542 


LIST  OF   AUTHORS   QUOTED 


Descartes,  E.  du  P.,  4 

Dini,  U.,  374 

Dinnik,  A.,  371 

Dirichlet,  P.  G.  Lejeune,  17,  60,  71,  76,  77,  80, 

81,  161,  167,  177,  241,  242,  252,  273,  308, 

309 
Dixon,  A.  C,  295,  526 
Dolbnia,  J.  P.  (Dolbnja,  Iwan),  454 
Dougall,  J.,  295 
Du  Bois  Eeymond,  P.  D.  G.,  66,  81 

Eisenstein,  F.  G.  M.,  52,  427 

Emde,  F.,  336,  371 

Encke,  J.  F,,  336 

Enneper,  A.,  448,  521 

Euclid,  540 

Euler,  L.,  16,  69,  119,  127,  128,  151,  155,  159, 
160,  229,  230,  231,  235,  247,  254,  255,  256, 
259,  260,  265,  266,  385,  350,  455,  480,  488, 
505,  535 

Faber,  G.,  530 

Fagnano,  (II  Marchese)  Giulio  Carlo  de  Toschi 

di,  422 
Feaux,  B.,  243 
F^jer,  L.,  161,  164 
Ferrers,  N.  M.,  317,  318,  324 
Filon,  L.  N.  G.,  392 
Floquet,  A.  M.  G.,  405,  406,  419 
Ford,  L.  E.,  448 
Forsyth,  A.  R,,  188,  195,  197,  198,  202,  279, 

381,  383,  384,  393,  429,  448,  512,  524,  527, 

528 
Fourier,  J.  B.  Joseph  (Baron),  160,  182,  205, 

374,  392,  456 
Fr^chet,  M.,  224 

Fredholm,  E.  I.,  206,  207,  209,  224 
Freeman,  A.,  392,  456 
Frend,  W.,  4 

Fricke,  K.  E.  E.,  474,  480,  501 
Frobenius,  F.  G.,  191,  195,  202,  313,  317,  414, 

439,  451 
Fuchs,  L  L.,  191,  202,  405 
Fiiratenau,  E.,  viii 
Fuss,  P.  H.,  231 

Gambioli,  D.,  148 

Gauss,  Carl  F.  (Johann  Friedrich  Karl),  7,  9, 

16,  234,  240,  241,  242,  275,  277,  288,  290, 

291,  302,  313,  422,  455,  505,  517,  526 
Gegenbauer,  L.,   323,  329,  354,  378 
Glaisher,  James,  336 
Glaisher,  J.  W.  L.,   484,  487,  489,  491,   500. 

502,  509,  516,   520,  523 
Gmeiner,  J.  A.,  14 
Goldbach,  C,   231 
Goursat,  Edouard  J.  B.,    53,  59,  61,  80,  85, 

108,  121,   144 


Grace,  J.  H.,  123 
Gray,  A.,  367,  371 
Green,  George,  387 
Gregory,  James,  16 
Gudermann,  C,  484,  487,  524 
Guichard,  C,  148 
Gutzmer,  C.  F.  A.,  109 

Hadamard,  J.,  108,  206 

Halm,  J.  K.  E.,  204 

Halphen,  G.  H.,  480,  528 

Hamburger,  M.,  405 

Hamilton,  Sir  William  Rowan,  8 

Hancock,  H.,  474,  480,  485 

Hankel,  H.,  10,  238,  261,  359,  362,  363,  364, 

367,  371 
Hansen,  P.  A.,  370 
Hardy,  G.  H.,  10,  17,  38,  50,  59,  69,  81,  156, 

159,  266,  291,  508,  530,  531 
Hargreave,  C.  J.,  375 
Hargreaves,  R.,  303 
Harkness,  J.,  480 
Heffter,  L.   IF.  J.,  41 
Heine,  H.  E.,  53,  54,  302,  313,  315,  320,  323, 

324,  361,  371,  455 
Hermite,  C,  198,  263,  264,  265,  294,  295,  327, 

344,  410,  450,  451,  480,  528 
Heun,  K.,  325 
Heymann,  K.  W.,  292 
Hey  wood,  H.  B.,  224 
Hicks,  W.  M.,  394 
Hilbert,  D.,  207,  221,  224 
Hill,  G.  W.,  36,  40,  399,  406,  407,  408,  409, 

410,  417,  419 
Hill,  M.  J.  M.,  97,  291 
Hobson,  E.  W.,  3,  10,  53,  56,  67,  75,  80,  160, 

161,  184,  286,  317,  319,  320,  324,  328,  358, 

374,  375,  530,  536,  540 
Hocevar,  F.,  335 
Hodgkinson,  J.,  306 
Holder,  0.,  66,  230 

Hurwitz,  Adolf,  161,  175,  259,  262,  263,  533 
Hurwitz,  Wallie  Abraham,   76 

Inoe,  E.  Lindsay,  417,  419,  420 
Isherwood,  J.  G.,  371 

Jackson,  F.  H.,  455 

Jacobi,  Karl  (Carl)  G.  J.,  39,  108,  109,  124, 
308,  362,  422,  455,  456,  457,  460,  461,  462, 
403,  467,  468,  471,  472,  473,  480,  481,  482, 
484,  487,  489,  491,  498,  501,  502,  503,  505, 
507,  509,  510,  512,  513,  515,  516,  521,  522, 
528 

Jacobsthal,  W.,  332,  345 

Jahuke,  P.  R.  E.,  336,   371 

Jamet,  E.  V.,  528 

Jeti'ery,  G.  B.,  396 


LIST  OF   AUTHORS   QUOTED 


643 


Jensen,  J.  L.  W.  V.,  264,  273 

Je2ek,  0.,  147 

Jordan,  If.  E.  C,  17,  115,  121,  480 

Kalahne,  A.,  371 

Kapteyn,  W.,  146,  367 

Kelvin    (Sir  William    Thomson),    Lord,    371, 

387,  392,  394 
Kiepert,  L.,  453 
Klein,  C.  Felix,  197,  198,  202,  203,  277,  474, 

480,  501 
Kluyver,  J.  C,  142 
Kneser,  J.  C.  G.  A.,  217 
Koch,  N.  F.  H.  von,  36,  37,  412,  416 
Kronecker,  L.,  123,  456,  461,  518 
Kummer,  E.  E.,  244,  256,  279,  290,  292,  332 

Lagrange,  J.  L.,  96,   132,  133 

Laguerre,  E.  A'^.,  335 

Lalesco  (Lalescu),  T.,  224 

Lamb,  H.,  62,  394 

Lame,  G.,  198,  394,  398,  410 

Landau,  E.  G.  H.,  11,  270,  273,  335 

Landen,  J.,  469,  500,  501 

Landsberg,  G.,  124,  468 

Laplace,  P.  S.  (Le  marquis  de),  205,  306,  308, 

379 
Laurent,  Paul  Mathieu  Hermann,  123,  315 
Laurent,  Pierre  Alphonse,  99 
Leaute,  H.,  330 
Lebesgue,  H.,  63,  167,  184 
Legendre,  A.  M.,  122,  198,  229,  234,  235,  247, 

254,  296,  297,  298,  299,  310,  320,  324,  329, 

335,  422,  488,  492,  505,  508,  511,  513,  514, 

515,  516,  517,  518,  520,  521 
Leibniz  (Leibnitz),  G.  W.,  67,  532 
Lerch,    M.,    81,     108,    110,    148,    265,    273, 

274 
Le  Vavasseur,  R.,  292 
Levi-Civit^,  T.,  144 
Liapounofif,  A.,  175 
Lie,  M.  Sophus,  41 

Lindelof,  Ernst  L.,  108,  121,  253,  273,  277 
Lindemann,  C.  L.  F.,  204,  410,  417,  419 
Lindstedt,  A.,  419 

Liouville,  J.,  105,  205,  215,  424,  448,  455 
Lipschitz,  R.  O.  S.,  371 
Littlewood,  J.  E.,  156,  159 
Loramel,  E.   C.  J.,   351,   358,  370,   371,   373, 

374,  376 
London,  F.,  26 
Love,  A.  E.  H.,  392 

McClintock,  E.,  133 

Macdonald,  H.  M.,  121,  329,  375,  376,  378 

Maclaurin,  Colin,   71,  77,  94,    127,   128,   151, 

422 
Maclaurin,  R.  C,  399,  419 


Malmst^n,  C.  J.,  243 

Mangeot,   S.,  147 

Manning,  H.  P.,  25 

Mansion,  P.,  43 

Mascheroni,  L.,  229 

Maseres,  Francis  (Baron),  4 

Mathews,  G.  B.,  367,  371,  529 

Mathieu,  E.  L.,  198,  397,  398,  404,  419,  420 

Maxwell,  J.  Clerk,  397 

Mehler,  F.  G.,  308,  309,  361,  376 

Meissel,  D.  F.  E.,  370 

Mellin,  R.  Hj.,  280,  290 

Merz,  J.  T.,  629 

Meyer,  F.  G.,  80 

Miidner,  R.,  148 

Milne,  A.,  225,  345,  348 

Minding,  E.  F.  A.,  119 

Mittag-Leffler,  M.  G.,  134 

Molk,  C.  F.  J.,  448,  457,  480,  521,  530 

Moore,  E.  H.,  230 

Morley,  F.,  295,  480 

Miiller,  H.  F.,  448,  521 

Murphy,  R.,  218,  305,  306 

Netto,  E,,  64 

Neumann,  Franz  Ernst,  314 

Neumann,  Karl  (Carl)  Gottfried,  215,  316,  323, 

351,   365,   367,  368,    369,  371,  373,   377^ 

378 
Newman,  F.  W.,  230 
Newton,  Sir  Isaac,  532,  534 
Nicholson,  J.  W.,  362,  371,  374,  376 
Nielsen,  N.,  142,  253,  371,  374,  377 
Niven,  Sir  William  D.,  394 

Olbricht,  R.,  318,  324,  328,  371 

Oldenburg,  H.,  532 

0!^good,  W.  F.,  45,  49,  59,  72,  87 

Painleve,  P.,  452 

Panton,  A.  W.,  206,  355,  446 

Papperitz,  J.   E.,  200,  201,   290 

Parseval,  M.  A.,   177 

Peano,  G.,  vii 

Pearson,  Karl,  347 

Peirce,  B.  0.,  371 

Picard,  C.  E.,  405 

Pierpont,  J.,  75 

Pincherle,  S.,  109,  142,   149,  329 

Plana,  G.  A.   A.,  146 

Pochhammer,  L.,  250,  286,  293 

Pockels,  F.   C.  A.,   392 

Poincare,  J.  Henri,  36,  151,  159 

Poisson,   S.  D.,  161,  362,  389,  468 

Porter,   M.  B.,  354 

Pringsheini,  A.,  17,  26,  27,  28,  33,  38,  243,  253, 

530 
Prym,  F.  £.,  335 


544 


LIST   OF   AUTHORS  QUOTED 


Eaabe,  J.  L.,  126,  255 

Bamanujan,  S.,  528 

Ravut,  L.,  87 

Rayleigh  (J.  W.   Strutt),  Lord,  184,  389,  392 

Reiff,  R.  A.,  16 

Richelot,  F.  J.,  526 

Riemann,  G.  F.  Bernhard,  26,  38,  63,  80,  84, 
85,  161,  166,  177,  178,  179,  180,  181,  184, 
200,  201,  202,  203,  259,  260,  263,  266,  267, 
268,  273,  288,  290 

Riesz,  M.,  156 

Eodrigues,  0.,  297 

Routh,  E.  J,,  326 

Russell,  Hon.  Bertrand  A.  W.,  5,  10,  529 

Saalschiitz,  L.,  237,  238,  295 

Salmon,  G.,  448 

Savidge,  H.  G.,  371 

Schafheitlin,  P.,  363 

Scheibner,  W.,  108,  109 

Schendel,  L.,  330 

Sobering,  E.  C.  J.,  505 

Schlafli,  L.,  207,  324,  327,  328,  351,  356,  357, 

366 
Scblesinger,  L.,  202 
Schlomilch,   O.   A'.,   142,   144,    159,   223,   236, 

253,  258,  335,  346,  349,  369,  370,  531,  532 
Schmidt,   0.  J.  E.,  217,  221,  224 
Schonholzer,  J.  J.,  372 
Schumacher,  H.  C,  505 
Schwarz,  K.  H.  A.,   181,  427,  448,  529 
Seidel,  P.  L.,  44 
Seiffert,  L.   G.  A.,  520 
Silva,  J.  A.  Martins  da,  325 
Simon,  H.,  38 
Smith,  B.  A.,  371 
Smith,  H.  J.  S.,  461,  480,  524 
Soldner,  J.  von,  335,  336 
Sommerfeld,  A.  J.   W.,  371 
Sanine  (Sonin,  Ssonin),  N.  J.,  346,  357,  375, 

376 


Stickelberger,  L.,  439,  451 

Stieltjes,  T.  J.,  255,  335,  410,  413,  417,   419 

Stirling,  James,  94,  151,  245,  247 

Stokes,  Sir  George  G.,  44,  73,  77,  81,  152,  198, 

371 
Stolz,  O.,  10,  14,  27 
Stormer,  F.  CM.,  122 
Sylvester,  J.  J.,  393,  412,  529 

Tait,  P.  G.,  387,  392 

Tannery,  J.,  448,  457,  480,  521,  530,  533 

Taylor,  Brook,  93 

Teixeira,  F.  G.,  131,  132,   146 

Thome,  L.  W.,  191,  202,  316 

Thomson,  Sir  William,  see  Kelvin 

Todhunter,  I.,  198,  324 

Transon,  A.  E,  L.,  viii 

Verhulst,  P.  F.,  521 

Volterra,  V.,  207,  212,  215,  224 

Walhs,  John,  11,   275,  532,  534 

Watson,  G.  N.,  43,  53,  59,  77,  108,  159,  292, 

345,  347,  419,  455 
Weber,  H.,  198,  225,  336,  341,  345,  375,  480 
Weierstrass,  Karl  (Carl)  T.  W.,  4,  13,  34,  41, 

44,  49,  99,  108,  110,  137,  230,  427,  447, 

448,  479,  480,  512,  529 
Wessel,  Caspar,  9 
Whitehead,  A.  N.,  10,  529 
Whittaker,  E.  T.,  225,  331,  333,  334,  341,  345, 

347,    381,    392,   400,   404,  417,  419,   448, 

495 
Wilson,  R.  W.,  371 
Wolstenholme,  J.,  123 
Wronski,  J.  Hoen6,  viii,  147 

Young,  A.  W.,  399,  419 
Young,  W.  H.,  56 

Zach,  (Freiherr)  F.  X.  von,  335 


GENERAL    INDEX 

[The  numbers  refer  to  the  pages.     Re/erences  to  theorems  contained  in  a  fetv 
of  the  more  important  examples  are  given  hy  numbers  in  italics^ 

Abel's  discovery  of  elliptic  functions,  422,  505 ;  inequality,  16 ;  integral  equation,  223,  224: ; 
method  of  establishing  addition  theorems,  435,  489,  490,  523,  527;  special  form,  ^^(z), 
of  the  confluent  hypergeometric  function,  347  ;  test  for  convergence,  17 ;  theorem  on  con- 
tinuity of  power  series,  57  ;  theorem  on  multiplication  of  convergent  series,  58,  59 

Abridged  notation  for  products  of  Theta-functions,  461,  462;  for  quotients  and  reciprocals  of 
elliptic  functions,  487 

Absolute  convergence,  18,  28;  Cauchy's  test  for,  21;  D'Alembert's  ratio  test  for,  22;  De 
Morgan's  test  for,  23 

Absolute  value,  see  Modulus 

Absolutely  convergent  double  sei'ies,  28;  infinite  products,  32;  series,  18,  (fundamental 
property  of)  25,  (multiplication  of)  29 

Addition  formulae,  distinguished  from  addition  theorems,  512 

Addition  formula  for  Bessel  functions,  351,  373;  for  Gegenbauer's  function,  329;  for  Legendre 
polynomials,  320,  387 ;  for  Legendre  functions,  322  ;  for  the  Sigma-function,  444 ;  for 
Theta-functions,  460;  for  the  Jacobian  Zeta-function  and  for  E(ii),  511,  527;  for  the 
third  kind  of  elliptic  integral,  516 ;    for  the  Weierstrassian  Zeta-function,  439 

Addition  theorem  for  circular  functions,  .535  ;  for  the  exponential  function,  531;  for  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions,  487,  490,  523;  for  the  Weierstrassian  elliptic  function,  433,  450;  proofs 
of,  by  Abel's  method,  435,  489,  490,  523,  527 

Affix,  9 

Air  in  a  sphere,  vibrations  of,  391 

Amplitude,  9 

Analytic  continuation,  96,  (not  always  possible)  98  ;  and  Borel's  integral,  141 ;  of  the  hyper- 
geometric function,  282.     See  alao  Asymptotic  expansions 

Analytic  functions,  82-110  (Chapter  v);  defined,  83;  derivates  of,  89,  (inequality  satisfied  by)  91; 
represented  by  integrals,  92;  Riemann's  equations  connected  with,  84;  values  of,  at  points 
inside  a  contour,  88;  uniformly  convergent  series  of,  91 

Angle,  analytical  definition  of,  539  ;   and  popular  conception  of  an  angle,  540 

Angle,  modular,  485 

Area  represented  by  an  integral,  61,  540 

Argand  diagram,  9 

Argument,  9,  538 ;    principal  value  of,  9,  538 ;    continuity  of,  538 

Associated  function  of  Borel,  141 ;  of  Riemann,  177  ;  of  Legendre  [P,  ™  (z)  and  Q^™  {z)],  317-319 

Asymptotic  expansions,  150-159  (Chapter  viii);  differentiation  of,  153;  integration  of,  153; 
multiplication  of,  152;  of  Bessel  functions,  361,  306,  367  ;  of  confluent  hypergeometric 
functions,  336,  337 ;  of  Gamma-functions,  245,  270  ;  of  parabolic  cylinder  functions,  342 ; 
uniqueness  of,  154 

Asymptotic  inequality  for  parabolic  cylinder  functions  of  large  order,  348 

Asymptotic  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation,  418 

Auto- functions,  220 

Automorpbic  functions,  448 

Axioms  of  arithmetic  and  geometry,  529 

W.   M.  A.  35 


546  GENERAL   INDEX 

Barnes'  contour  integrals  for  the  hypergeometric  function,  280,283;  for  the  confluent  hyper- 
geometric  function,  337-339 

Barnes'  G-function,  258,  272 

Barnes'  Lemma,  283 

Basic  numbers,  455 

Bemoullian  numbers,  126 ;  polynomials,  126,  127 

Bertrand's  test  for  convergence  of  infinite  integrals,  71 

Bessel  coefficients  [J„  (z)],  100,  349 ;  addition  formulae  for,  351 ;  Bessel's  integral  for,  355  ; 
differential  equation  satisfied  by,  351;  expansion  of,  as  power  series,  350;  expansion  of 
functions  in  series  of  (by  Neumann),  367,  377,  (by  Schlomilch),  viii,  369;  expansion  of 
{t  -  2)~i  in  series  of,  368  ;  expressible  as  a  confluent  form  of  Legendre  functions,  361  ; 
expressible  as  confluent  hypergeometric  functions,  352;  inequality  satisfied  by,  372; 
Neumann's  function  O,^  {z)  connected  with,  see  Neumann's  function ;  order  of,  351  ;  recur- 
rence formulae  for,  353  ;  special  case  of  confluent  hypergeometric  functions,  352.  See 
also  Bessel  functions 

Bessel  functions,  349-378  (Chapter  xvii),  J„(2)  defined,  353;  addition  formulae  for,  373; 
asymptotic  expansion  of,  361,  366,  367;  expansion  of,  as  an  ascending  series,  353,  364; 
expansion  of  functions  in  series  of,  367,  369,  374 ;  first  kind  of,  353  ;  Hankel's  integral 
for,  35'J  ;  integral  connecting  Legendre  functions  with,  358,  394  ;  integral  properties  of, 
373,  378 ;  integrals  involving  products  of,  373,  376,  378 ;  notations  for,  350,  365  ;  order 
of,  351 ;  products  of,  372,  373,  376,  378,  421  ;  recurrence  formulae  for,  353,  366,  367  ; 
relations  between,  354,  364;  relation  between  Gegenbauer's  function  and,  378;  Schlafli's 
form  of  Bessel's  integral  for,  356,  366;  second  kind  of,  Y,,[z)  (Hankel),  363,  YC)  (2) 
(Neumann),  365;  second  kind  of  modified,  K^{z),  367;  solution  of  Laplace's  equation  by, 
388 ;  i-olution  of  the  wave-motion  equation  by,  390  ;  tabulation  of,  370  ;  whose  order  is 
large,  362,  376 ;  whose  order  is  half  an  odd  integer,  358 ;  with  imaginary  argument, 
I^{z),K^{z),  366,  Z(S1,377;  zeros  of,  354,  360,  371,  373.  See  also  Bessel  coefficients  and 
Bessel's  equation 

Bessel's  equation,  198,  353,  366  ;  fundamental  system  of  solutions  of  (when  n  is  not  an  in- 
teger), 353,  367;   second  solution  when  n  is  an  integer,  363,  367.     See  also  Bessel  functions 

Binet's  integrals  for  log  r  (z),  242-245 

Binomial  theorem,  95 

Bdcher's  theorem  on  linear  differential  equations  with  five  singularities,  197 

Bolzano's  theorem  on  limit  points,  13 

Bonnet's  form  of  the  second  mean  value  theorem,  66 

Borel's  associated  function,  141;  integral,  140;  integral  and  analytic  continuation,  141;  method 
of  'summing'  series,   154;    theorem  (the  modified  Heine-Borel  theorem),  53 

Boundary,  44 

Boundary  conditions,  380  ;   and  Laplace's  equation,  386 

Bounds  of  continuous  functions,  55  • 

Branch  of  a  function,  106 

Branch-point,  106 

Burmann's  theorem,  129  ;   extended  by  Teixeira,  131 

Cantor's  Lemma,  177 

Cauchy's   condition  for  the  existence  of  a  limit,  13;    discontinuous   factor,   123;    formula  for 

the  remainder  in  Taylor's  series,  96;  inequality  for  derivates  of  an  analytic  function,  91; 

integral,  119;   numbei's,  372;    tests  for  convergence  of  series  and  integrals,  21,  71 
Cauchy's  theorem,  85  ;    extension  to  curves  on  a  cone,  87  » 

CeU,    423 

Ces^ro's  method  of  'summing'  series,   155;   generalised,  156 
Change  of  order  of  terms  in  a  series,  25 ;   in  an  infinite  determinant,  37 
Change  of  parameter  (method  of  solution  of  Mathieu's  equation),  417 
Characteristic  functions,  220 ;   numbers,  213  ;   numbers  associated  with  symmetric  nuclei  are 

real,  220 


GENERAL   INDEX  547 

Ohsurtier'B  test  for  convergence  of  infinite  integrals,  72 

Circle,  area  of  sector  of,  540 ;   limiting,  98  ;   of  convergence,  30 

Circular  functions,  428,  534  ;  addition  theorems  for,  535 ;  continuity  of,  535  ;  differentiation 
of,  535 ;  duplication  formulae,  535 ;  periodicity  of,  537  ;  relation  with  Gamma-functions, 
233 

Circular  membrane,  vibrations  of,  389 

Class,  left  (L),  4  ;   right  (B),  4 

Closed,  44 

Coefficients,  equating,  59 ;  in  Fourier  series,  nature  of,  173  ;  in  trigonometrical  series,  values 
of,  163 

Coefficients  of  Bessel,  see  Bessel  coefficients 

Comparison  theorem  for  convergence  of  integrals,  71;   for  convergence  of  series,  20 

Complementary  moduli,  472,  486 ;   elliptic  integrals  with,  472,  494,  513 

Complete  elliptic  integrals  [£,  K,  E',  A'']  (first  and  second  kinds),  491,  492,  511 ;  Legendre's  re- 
lation between,  513  ;  properties  of  (qua  functions  of  the  modulus),  477,  491,  492,  494,  514 ; 
series  for,  ;295 ;  tables  of,  511  ;  the- Gaussian  transformation,  5i;;6;  values  for  small  values 
of  I  A;  I,  514;  values  (as  Gamma  functions)  for  special  values  of  k,  517-520;  with  comple- 
mentary moduli,  472,  494,  513 

Complex  integrals,  77;   upper  limit  to  value  of,  78 

Complex  integration,  fundamental  theorem  of,  78 

Complex  numbers,  3-10  (Chapter  i),  defined,  6 ;  amplitude  of,  9 ;  argument  of,  9,  538 ;  de- 
pendence of  one  on  another,  41;  imaginary  part  of  (I),  9;  logarithm  of,  539;  modulus  of,  8; 
real  part  of  (R),  9  ;    representative  point  of,  9 

Complex  variable,  continuous  function  of  a,  44 

Computation  of  elliptic  functions,  478 

Conditional  convergence  of  series,  18  ;  of  infinite  determinants,  408.  See  also  Convergence 
and  Absolute  convergence 

Condition  of  integrability  (Eiemann's),  63 

Conditions,  Dirichlet's,  167 

Conduction  of  Heat,  equation  of,  380 

Confluence,  196,  331 

Confluent  form,  197,  331 

Confluent  hypergeometric  function  ['^V,  «»(-)]>  331-348  (Chapter  xv)  ;  equation  for,  331; 
general  asymptotic  expansion  of,  336,  339 ;  integral  defining,  333  ;  integrals  of  Barnes' 
type  for,  337-339 ;  Kummer's  formulae  for,  332 ;  recurrence  formulae  for,  346  ;  relations 
with  Bessel  functions,  352;  the  functions  ^Vj^^j^(z)  and  Mjc^^{z),  332,  333;  the  relations 
between  functions  of  these  types,  340;  various  functions  expressed  in  terms  of  Wic,m{^)y 
334,  346,  347,  352.     See  also  Bessel  functions  and  Parabolic  cylinder  functions 

Confocal  coordinates,  398 

Congruence  of  points  in  the  Argand  diagram,  423 

Constant,  Euler's  or  Mascheroni's,  [7],  229,  240,  242 

Constants  e^,  c-i,  63,  436;  E,  E',  511,  513  ;  of  Fourier,  175  ;  iji,  772-  ^139,  (relation  between  t)^  and 
7?2)  439;    G,  465;   K,  477,  491,  492;    K' ,  477,  494,  496 

Construction  of  elliptic  functions,  426,  471,  485;  of  Mathieu  functions,  402,  (second  method)  413 

Contiguous  hypergeometric  functions,  288 

Continua,  43 

Continuation,  analytic,  96,  (not  always  possible)  98 ;  and  Borel's  integral,  141  ;  of  the  hyper- 
geometric function,  282.     See  also  Asymptotic  expansions 

Continuity,  42  ;  of  power  series,  57,  (Abel's  theorem)  57  ;  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  variable, 
538;  of  the  circular  functions,  535;  of  the  exponential  function,  531;  of  the  logarithmic 
function,  533,  539  ;   uniformity  of,  54 

Continuous  functions,  41-60  (Chapter  in),  defined,  42  ;  bounds  of,  55 ;  integrability  of,  63 ;  of  a 
complex  variable,  44;   of  two  variables,  67 

Contour,  85;    roots  of  an  equation  iu  the  interior  of  a,   119,  123 

35—2 


548  GENERAL   INDEX 

Contour  integrals,  85;  evaluation  of  definite  integrals  by,  112-124;  the'Mellin-Barnes  type  of, 
280,  337;    see  also  tinder  the  special  function  represented  by  the  integral 

Convergence,  11-40  (Chapter  ii),  defined,  14;  circle  of,  30;  conditional,  18;  of  a  double  series, 
27  ;  of  an  infinite  determinant,  86;  of  an  infinite  product,  32  ;  of  an  infinite  integral,  70, 
(tests  for)  71,  72;  of  a  series  15,  (Abel's  test  for)  17,  (Dirichlet's  test  for)  17;  of  the  geo- 
metric series,  19 ;  of  the  hypergeometric  series,  24  ;  of  the  series  S?i~*,  19 ;  of  the  series 
occurring  in  Mathieu  functions,  415 ;  of  trigonometrical  series,  161 ;  principle  of,  14  ;  radius 
of,  80;  theorem  on  (Hardy's),  156.  See  also  Absolute  convergence,  Non-tmiform  convergence 
ajid  Uniformity  of  convergence 

Coordinates,  coufocal,  398 ;   orthogonal,  394 

Cosecant,  series  for,  185 

Cosine,  see  Circular  functions 

Cosine-integral  [Ci  (z)],  346  ;   -series  (Fourier  series),   171 

Cotangents,  expansion  of  a  function  in  series  of,  139 

Cubic  function,  integration  problem  connected  with,  445,  505 

Cunningham's  function  [w„,^(^)],  347 

Curve,  simple,  43 ;  on  a  cone,  extension  of  Cauchy's  theorem  to,  87 ;  on  a  sphere  (Seiffert's 
spiral),  520 

Cut,  275 

D'Alembert's  ratio  test  for  convergence  of  series,  22 

Darboux'  formula,  125 

Decreasing  sequence,  12  ^ 

Dedekind's  theory  of  irrational  numbers,  4 

Deficiency,  448 

Definite  integrals,  evaluation  of,  111-124  (Chapter  vi) 

Degree  of  Legendre  functions,  296,  301,  318 

De  la  Valine  Poussin's  test  for  uniformity  of  convergence  of  an  infinite  integral,  72 

De  Morgan's  test  for  convergence  of  series,  23 

Dependence  of  one  complex  number  on  another,  41 

Derangement  of  convergent  series,  25;  of  double  series,  28;   of  infinite  determinants,  37;   of 

infinite  products,  33,  34 
Derivates  of  an  analytic  function,  89;    Cauchy's  inequality  for,  91;   integrals  for,  89 
Derivates  of  elliptic  functions,  41^3 
Determinant,  Hadamard's,  206 
Determinants,  infinite,  36  ;   convergence  of,  36,  (conditional)  408;   discussed  by  Hill,  36,  408; 

evaluated  by  Hill  in  a  particular  case,  408;   rearraugement  of,  37 
Difference  equation  satisfied  by  the  Gamma-function,  231 
Differential  equations  satisfied  by  elliptic  functions  and  quotients  of  Theta-functions,  429,  463, 

485;  (partial)  satisfied  by  Theta-functions,  463;  Weierstrass'  theorem  on  Gamma-functions 

and,  230.     See  also  Linear  differential  equations  and  Partial  diflerential  equations 
Differentiation  of  an   asymptotic  expansion,    153  ;    of   a  Fourier   series,    174 ;    of  an    infinite 

integral,  74  ;    of  an  integral,  67  ;   of  a  series,   79,  91 ;    of  elliptic  functions,  423,  486 ;   of 

the  circular  functions,  535  ;  of  the  exponential  function,  532;  of  the  logarithmic  function, 

534,  539 
Dirichlet's   conditions,    167;    form    of    Fourier's   theorem,    167;    formula  connecting  repeated 

integrals,    75 ;    integral,    252 ;    integral   for  r//  (z),  241 ;    integral    for   Legendre    functions, 

308 ;    test  for  convergence,  17 
Discontinuities,  42  ;  and  non-uniform  convergence,  47  ;    of  Fourier  seiies,  175  ;  ordinary,  42 ; 

regular  distribution  of,  20G  ;    removable,  42 
Discontinuous  factor,  Cauchy's,  123 

Discriminant  associated  with  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions,  437 
Divergence  of  a  series,   15  ;    of  infinite  products,  33 
Domain,  44 
Double  circuit  integrals,  250,  287 


GENERAL   INDEX  549 

Double  Integrals,  68,  249 

Double  series,  26  ;  absolute  convergence  of,  28;  convergence  of  (Stolz'  condition),  27;  methods 

of  summin<,',  27;   a  particular  form  of,  51;    rearrangement  of,  28 
Doubly  periodic  functions,  422  et  seq.    See  Jacoblan  elliptic  functions,  Theta-functlons  and 

Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions 
Duplication  formula  for  the   circular  functions,  535;    for  the  Gamma- function,  234;    for  the 

Jacobian  elliptic  functions,  491 ;  for  the  Sigma-function,  452,  453 ;    for  the  Theta-functions, 

481 ;  for  the  Weierstrassian  elliptic  function,  434  ;  for  the  Weierstrassian  Zeta-function,  452 

Electromagnetic  waves,  equations  for,  397 

Elementary  functions,  82 

Elementary  transcendental  functions,  529-540  (Appendix).  See  also  Circular  functions, 
Exponential  function  and  Logarithm 

Elliptic  cylinder  functions,  see  Mathieu  functions 

Elliptic  functions,  422-528  (Chapters  xx-xxii) ;  computation  of,  478  ;  construction  of,  426,  471 ; 
derivate  of,  423 ;  discovery  of,  by  Abel,  Gauss  and  Jacobi,  422,  505,  517 ;  expressed  by 
means  of  Theta-functions,  466 ;  expressed  by  means  of  Weierstrassian  functions,  441-444 ; 
general  addition  formula,  450;  number  of  zeros  (or  poles)  in  a  cell,  424,  425;  order  of, 
425;  periodicity  of,  422,  472,  493,  495,  496;  period  parallelogram  of,  423;  relation  be- 
tween zeros  and  poles  of,  426 ;  residues  of,  424,  497 ;  transformations  of,  501 ;  with  no 
poles  (are  constant),  424;  with  one  double  pole,  425,  427;  with  the  same  periods 
(relations  between),  445 ;  with  two  simple  poles,  425,  484.  See  also  Jacobian  elliptic 
functions,  Theta-functions  and  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions 

Elliptic  integrals,  422,  505 ;  first  kind  of,  508  ;  function  E  (u)  and,  510 ;  function  Z  (u)  and, 
611 ;  inversion  of,  422,  445,  447,  473,  477,  505,  517  ;  second  kind  of,  510,  (addition  formulae 
for)  511,  512,  527,  (imaginary  transformation  of)  512 ;  third  kind  of,  515,  516,  (dynamical 
application  of)  516,  (parameter  of)  515 ;  three  kinds  of,  507.  See  also  Complete  elliptic 
integnrals 

Elliptic  membrane,  vibrations  of,  397 

Equating  coefficients,  59 

Equation  of  degree  m  has  m  roots,  120 

Equations,  iudicial,  192;  number  of  roots  inside  a  contour,  119,  123;  of  Mathematical  Phy- 
sics, 197,  379-396  ;  with  periodic  coefficients,  405.  See  also  Difference  equation,  Integftal 
equations,  Linear  differential  equations,  and  under  the  names  of  special  equations 

Equivalence  of  curvilinear  integrals,  83 

Error-function  [Erf(x)  and  Erfc(a;)],  335 

Essential  singiUarity,   102  ;  at  infinity,   104 

Eta-function  [H  (u)],  472 

Eulerian  integrals,  first  kind  of  [B  (m,  n)],  247 ;  expressed  by  Gamma-functions,  248 ; 
extended  by  Pochhammer,  250 

Eulerian  integrals,  second  kind  of,  235  ;   see  Gamma-function 

Euler's  constant  [7],  229,  240,  242 ;  expansion  (Maclaurin's),  127  ;  method  of  '  summing ' 
series,  155 ;  product  for  the  Gamraa-function,  231 ;  product  for  the  Zeta-function  of 
Riemann,  265 

Evaluation  of  definite  integrals  and  of  infinite  integrals,  111-124  (Chapter  vi) 

Evaluation  of  Hill's  infinite  determinant,  408 

Even  functions,  115,  171;   of  Mathieu  [ce„(z,  q)],  400   ■ 

Existence  of  derivatives  of  analytic  function,  89  ;  -theorems,  381 

Expansions  of  functions,  125-149  (Chapter  vii)  ;  by  Burmann,  129,  131;  by  Darboux,  125;  by 
Euler  and  Maclaurin,  127  ;  by  Fourier  and  Bessel,  374 ;  by  Lagrange,  132, 149  ;  by  Laurent, 
99;  by  Maclaurin,  94 ;  by  Vlnna,  145;  by  Taylor,  93 ;  by  Wronski,  viii,  147 ;  in  infinite 
products,  136  ;  in  series  of  Bessel  coefficients  or  Bessel  functions,  368,  369,  374,  377 ;  in 
series  of  cotangents,  139 ;  in  series  of  inverse  factorials,  142 ;  in  series  of  Legendre 
polynomials  or  Legendre  functions,  304,316,5^4,5^5,  329;  in  series  of  Neumann  func- 
tions,  369,   377;    in   series   of   parabolic   cylinder   functions,    345;    in   series   of  rational 


550  GENERAL  INDEX 

functions,  134.      See  also  Asjrmptotic   expansions,  Fourier   series.  Series,  and  under  the 

names  of  special  functions 
Exponential  function,  531 ;    addition  theorem  for,  531 ;   continuity  of,  531 ;   differentiation  of, 

532  ;    periodicity  of,  535 
Exponential-integral  [Ei(2)],  346 

Exponents  at  a  regular  point  of  a  linear  differential  equation,  192 
Exterior,  44 
External  spheroidal  harmonic,  396 

Factor,  Caucliy's  discontinuous,  123 ;  periodicity-,  456 

Factorials,  expansion  in  a  series  of  inverse,  142 

Factor-theorem  of  Weierstrass,  137 

F^jer's  theorem  on  the  summability  of  Fourier  series,  164 

Ferrers'  associated  Legendre  functions  {Pn^{z)  and  Q,^(z)'\,  317 

First  kind,  Bessel  functions  of,  353 ;  elliptic  integrals  of,  508,  (complete)  511,  (integration  of) 
508 ;  Eulerian  integral  of,  247,  (expressed  by  Gamma-functions)  248 ;  integral  equation 
of,  215 ;  Legendre  functions  of,  301 

First  mean-value  theorem,  65,  96 

Floquet's  solution  of  differential  equations  with  periodic. coefficients,  405 

Fluctuation,  56 ;  total,  57 

Foundations  of  arithmetic  and  geometry,  529 

Fourier-Bessel  expansion,  374;  integral,  377 

Fourier  constants,  175 

Fourier  series,  160-187  (Chapter  ix) ;  coefficients  in,  173 ;  differentiation  of,  174 ;  discon- 
tinuities of,  175 ;  expansions  of  a  function  in,  167-169 ;  expansions  of  Jacobian  elliptic 
functions  in,  503,  504;  expansion  of  Mathieu  functions  in,  402,  404,  407,  413;  F^jer's 
theorem  on,  164;  Hurvvitz-Liapounoff  theorem  on,  175;  series  of  sines  and  series  of 
cosines,  171 ;  summability  of,  164 ;  uniformity  of  convergence  of,  169.  See  also  Trigono- 
metrical series 

Fourier's  theorem,  Dirichlet's  statement  of,  167 

Fourier's  theorem  on  integrals,  182,  205 

Fredholm's  integral  equation,  207-211,  222 

Functionality,  concept  of,  41 

Functions,  branches  of,  106 ;  identity  of  two,  98 ;  limits  of,  42 ;  principal  parts  of,  102 ; 
without  essential  singularities,  105;  which  cannot  be  continued,  98.  See  also  under  the 
names  of  special  functions  or  special  types  of  functions,  e.g.  Legendre  functions.  Analytic 
functions 

Fundamental  formulae  of  Jacobi  connecting  Theta-functions,  460,  481 

Fundamental  period  parallelogram,  423  ;    polygon  (of  automorphic  functions),  448 

Fundamental  system  of  solutions  of  a  linear  differential  equation,  191,  194.  See  also  under 
the  names  of  special  equatiojis 

Gamma- function  [r(2;)],  229-258  (Chapter  xii) ;  asymptotic  expansion  of,  245,  270;  circular 
functions  and,  233  ;  complete  elliptic  integrals  and,  517-520,  528;  contour  integral  (Hankel's) 
for,  238  ;  difference  equation  satisfied  by,  231 ;  differential  equations  and,  230  ;  duplication 
formula,  234 ;  Euler's  integral  of  the  first  kind  and,  248 ;  Eulei-'s  integral  of  the 
second  kind,  235,  (modified  by  Hankel)  238,  (modified  by  Saalschiitz)  237;  Euler's 
product,  231 ;  incomplete  form  of,  335  ;  integrals  for,  (Binet's)  242-245,  (Euler's)  235 ; 
minimum  value  of,  247;  multiplication  formula,  234;  sei'ies,  (Rummer's)  244,  (Stirling's) 
245  ;  tabulation  of,  247  ;  trigonometrical  integrals  and,  250 ;  Weierstrassian  product,  229. 
See  also  Eulerian  integrals  and  Logarithmic  derivate  of  the  Gamma-function 

Gauss'  discovery  of  elliptic  functions,  422,  505,  517;  integral  for  V  (z)lT  (z),  240;  lemniscate 
functions,  see  Lemniscate  functions ;   transformation  of  elliptic  integrals,  626 

Gegenbauer's  function  [C'^"  (z)],  323 ;  addition  formula,  329 ;  differential  equation  for,  323 ; 
recurrence    formulae,    324 ;    relation    with    Legendre    functions,    323 ;    relation    involving 


GENERAL   INDEX  551 

Bessel    functions    and,    378 ;    Rodrigues'    formula    (analogue),    323 ;    Schlafli's    integral 

(analogue),  323 
Ctonus,  448 
Geometric  series,  19 

Olalsher's  notation  for  quotients  and  reciprocals  of  elliptic  functions,  487 
Greatest  of  tbe  limits,  13 
Green's  functions,  387 

Hadamard's  lemma,  206 

Half-periods  of  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions,  437 

Hankel's  Bessel  function  of  the  second  kind,  Y^{z),  363;  contour  integral  for  V(z),  238; 
integral  for  J„(i;),  359 

Hardy's  convergence  theorem,  156 ;  test  for  uniform  convergence,  50 

Harmonics,  solid  and  surface,  385 ;  spheroidal,  396 ;  zonal,  296 ;  Sylvester's  theorem  con- 
cerning integrals  of,  393 

Heat,  ecjuation  of  conduction  of,  380 

Heine-Borel  theorem  (modified),  53 

Heine's  expansion  of  {t-z)~'^  in  series  of  Legendre  functions,  315 

Hermite's  equation,  198,  203,  336,  341.     See  also  Parabolic  cylinder  functions 

Hermite's  formula  for  the  generalised  Zeta-function  f  (s,  «),  263 

Hill's  equation,  399,  406-410;  Hill's  method  of  solution,  406 

Hill's  infinite  determinant,  36,  40,  408 ;  evaluation  of,  408 

Hobson's  associated  Legendre  functions,  319 

Homogeneity  of  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions,  432 

Homogeneous  integral  equations,  211,  213 

Hurwitz'  definition  of  the  generalised  Zeta-function  f(s,  a),  259;  formula  for  ^{s,a),  262; 
theorem  concerning  Fourier  constants,  175 

Hypergeometric  equation,  see  Hypergeometric  functions 

Hypergeometrlc  functions,  275-295  (Chapter  xiv)  ;  Barnes'  integrals,  280,  283 ;  contiguous, 
288;  continuation  of,  282;  contour  integrals  for,  285;  differential  equation  for,  196,  201, 
277;  functions  expressed  in  terms  of,  275,  305;  of  two  variables  (Appell's),  294;  relations 
between  twenty-four  expressions  involving,  278,  279,  284  ;  Eiemann's  P-equation  and, 
202,  277;  series  for  (convergence  of),  24,  275;  squares  and  products  of,  292;  value  of 
F{a,  b;  c;  1),  275,  287;  values  of  special  forms  of  hypergeometric  functions,  292,  295. 
See  also  Bessel  functions,  Confluent  hypergeometric  functions  and  Legendre  functions 

Hypergeometric  series,  see  Hypergeometric  functions 

Hypothesis  of  Riemann  on  zeros  of  f  (s),  266 

Identically  vanishing  power  series,  58 

Identity  of  two  functions,  98 

Imaginary  argument,  Bessel  functions  with  [In{z)  and  A'„(2)],  366,  367,  377 

Imaginary  part  (J)  of  a  complex  number,  9 

Imaginary  transformation  (Jacobi's)  of  elliptic   functions,  498,  499 ;   of  Theta-functions,  124, 

467;    of  7<;(!<)  and  Z(u),   512 
Improper  integrals,  75 
Incomplete  Gamma-functions  [7  {n,  x)],  335 
Increasing  sequence,  12 
Indicial  equation,  192 
Inequality  (Abel's),  16;    (Hadamard's)  206;    satisfied  by  Bessel  coefficients,  372;   satisfied  by 

Legendre   polynomials,  297;    satisfied    by  Parabolic   cylinder    functions,  348;    satisfied   by 

f  (s,  a),  268,  269 
Infinite  determinants,  see  Determinants 
Infinite  integrals,  69;  convergence  of,  70,  71;    differentiation  of,  74;  evaluation  of,  111-124; 

functions  represented  by,  see  under  the   navies  of  special   functions ;    representing  analytic 


552  GENERAL   INDEX 

functions,  92  ;  theorems  concerning,  73 ;  uniform  convergence  of,  70,  72,  73.  See  also 
Integrals  and  Integration 

Infinite  products,  32  ;  absolute  convergence  of,  32  ;  convergence  of,  32  ;  divergence  to  zero, 
83;  expansions  of  functions  as,  136,  137  {see  also  'under  the  names  of  special  functions); 
expressed  by  means  of  Theta-functions,  466,  481 ;   uniform  convergence  of,  49 

Infinite  series,  see  Series 

Infinity,  11,  103 ;  essential  singularity  at,  104 ;  point  at,  103 ;  pole  at,  104  ;  zero  at,  104 

Integers,  positive,  3  ;  signless,  3 

Integrability  of  continuous  functions,  63  ;  Eiemann's  condition  of,  63 

Integral,  Borel's,  140 ;  and  analytic  continuation,  141 

Integral,  Cauchy's,  119 

Integral,  Dirichlet's,  252 

Integral  equations,  205-225  (Chapter  xi) ;  Abel's,  223,  224;  Fredholm's,  207-211,  222;  homo- 
geneous, 211,  213  ;  kernel  of,  207  ;  Liouville-Neumann  method  of  solution  of,  215  ;  nucleus 
of,  207;  numbers  (characteristic)  associated  with,  213;  of  the  first  and  second  kinds,  207, 
215 ;  satisfied  by  Mathieu  functions,  400 ;  satisfied  by  parabolic  cylinder  functions,  225 ; 
Schlomilch's,  223 ;  solutions  in  series,  222  ;  Volterra's,  215 ;  with  variable  upper  limit, 
207,  215 

Integral  formulae  for  the  Weierstrassian  elliptic  function,  430 ;  for  the  Jacobian  elliptic 
functions,  485,  487 

Integral  functions,  106;  and  Mathieu's  equation,  411 

Integral  properties  of  Bessel  functions,  373,  378 ;  of  Legendre  functions,  219,  299,  318 ;  of 
Mathieu  functions,  404;  of  Neumann's  function,  378;  of  parabolic  cylinder  functions, 
344 

Integrals,  61-81  (Chapter  iv);  along  curves  (equivalence  of),  87;  complex,  77,  78;  differentiation 
of,  67;  double,  68,  249;  double-ch-cuit,  250,  287;  evaluation  of,  111-124;  for  derivates  of 
an  analytic  function,  89 ;  functions  represented  by,  see  under  the  names  of  the  special 
functions;  improper,  75;  lower,  61;  of  harmonics  (Sylvester's  theorem),  393;  of  irrational 
functions,  445 ;  of  periodic  functions,  112 ;  principal  values  of,  75,  117  j  regular,  195  ; 
repeated,  68,  75 ;  representing  analytic  functions,  92  ;  representing  areas,  61,  540 ;  round 
a  contour,  85 ;  upper,  61.     See  also  Elliptic  integrals,  Infinite  integrals,  and  Integration 

Integral  theorem,  Fourier's,  182,  205 ;   of  Fourier-Bessel,  377 

Integration,  61 ;  complex,  77 ;  contour-,  77 ;  general  theorem  on,  63 ;  general  theorem  on 
complex,  78 ;  of  asymptotic  expansions,  153 ;  of  integrals,  68,  74,  75  ;  of  series,  78 ;  pro- 
blem connected  with  cubics  or  quartics  and  elliptic  functions,  445,  505.  See  also  Infinite 
integrals  and  Integrals 

Interior,  44 

Internal  spheroidal  harmonics,  396 

Invariants  of  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions,  430 

Inverse  factorials,  expansions  in  series  of,  142 

Inversion  of  elliptic  integrals,  422,  445,  447,  473,  477,  505,  517 

Irrational  functions,  integration  of,  445,  505 

Irrational-real  numbers,  5 

Irreducible  set  of  zeros  or  poles,  423 

Irregular  points  (singularities)  of  differential  equations,  191,   196 

Iterated  functions,  216 

Jacobian  elliptic  functions  [sn  u,  en  «,  dnu],  425,  471,  484-528  (Chapter  xxii) ;  addition  theorems 
for,  487,  490,  523,  528;  connexion  with  Weierstrassian  functions,  498;  definitions  of  am  m, 
A(p,  snu  (sin  amw),  cnii,  dnu,  471,  485,  487;  differential  equations  satisfied  by,  463,  485; 
differentiation  of,  486 ;  duplication  formulae  for,  491 ;  Fourier  series  for,  503,  504,  528  ; 
geometrical  illustration  of,  517,  520  ;  general  description  of,  497  ;  Glaisher's  notation  for 
quotients  and  reciprocals  of,  4S7;  infinite  products  for,  501,  525;  integral  formulae  for, 
4:8o,  487 ;  Jacobi's  imaginary  transformation  of,  498,499;  Landen's  transformation  of, 
500;    modular  angle  of,  485  ;    modulus  of,  472,  485,  (complementary)  472,  486  ;    parametric 


GENERAL  INDEX  658 

representation  of  points  on  curves  by,  517,  520,  520,  526',  periodicity  of,  472,  493,  495,  496; 
poles  of,  425,  496,  497;  quarter  periods,  K,  iK',  of,  472,  491,  492,  494;  relations  between, 
485 ;  residues  of,  497  ;  Seiffert's  spherical  spiral  and,  520 ;  triplication  formulae,  523,  527, 
528;  values  of,  when  u  is  ^K,  ^iK'  or  ^(K  +  iK'),  493,  499,  500;  values  of,  when  the 
modulus  is  small,  525.  See  also  Elliptic  functions,  Elliptic  integrals,  Lenmiscate  fonctions, 
Theta-functions,  and  Welerstrassian  elliptic  functions 

Jacobi's  discovery  of  elliptic  functions,  422,  505 ;  earlier  notation  for  Theta-functions,  472  ; 
fundamental  Theta-function  formulae,  460,  481  ;  imaginary  transformations,  124,  467, 
498,  499,  512 ;   Zeta-function,  see  under  Zeta-function  of  Jacobi 

Jordan's  lemma,  115 

Kernel,  207 

Klein's  theorem  on  linear  differential  equations  with  five  singularities,  197 

Kummer's  formulae  for  confluent  hypergeometric  functions,  332 ;  series  for  log  T  (z),  244 

LacuDiary  function,  78 

Lagrange's  expansion,  132,  149;    form  for  the  remainder  in  Taylor's  series,  96 

Lamp's  equation,  198  ;  generalised,  198 ;    solution  of,  452,  528 

Landen's  transformation  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions,  469,  500,  526 

Laplace's  equation,  379 ;  its  general  solution,  381 ;  solutions  involving  functions  of  Legendre 
and  Bessel,  384,388;  solution  with  given  boundary  conditions,  386;  symmetrical  solution 
of,  392;   transformations  of,  394 

Laplace's  integrals  for  Legendre  polynomials  and  functions,  306,  307,  308,  313,  320,  328 

Laurent's  expansion,  99 

Least  of  limits,  13 

Lebesgue's  lemma,  167 

Left  (L-)  class,  4 

Legendre's  equation,  198,  298 ;  for  associated  functions,  318 ;  second  solution  of,  310.  See 
also  Legendre  functions  and  Legendre  polynomials 

Legendre  functions,  296-330  (Chapter  xv);  P„(z),  Q.„(z),  P,i'»(^),  Q™™  («)  defined,  300,  310,  317, 
319;  addition  formulae  for,  322,  387;  Bessel  functions  and,  358,  361,  394;  degree 
of,  301,  318  ;  differential  equation  for,  198,  300,  318  ;  distinguished  from  Legendre  poly- 
nomials, 300 ;  expansions  in  ascending  series,  305,  320 ;  expansions  in  descending  series, 
296,  311,  320,  328;  expansion  of  a  function  as  a  series  of,  328;  expressed  by  Murphy  as 
hypergeometric  functions,  305,  306 ;  expression  of  Q„  (z)  in  terms  of  Legendre  polynomials, 
313,  314,  327 ;  Ferrers'  functions  associated  with,  317,  318  ;  first  kind  of,  301;  Gegenbauer's 
function,  C^"  (2),  associated  with,  see  Gegenbauer's  function;  Heine's  expansion  of  (t-z)-''- 
as  a  series  of,  315 ;  Hobson's  functions  associated  with,  319  ;  integral  connecting  Bessel 
functions  with,  358 ;  integral  properties  of,  318 ;  Laplace's  integrals  for,  306,  307,  313 
320,  328 ;  Mehler-Dirichlet  integral  for,  308 ;  order  of,  318 ;  recurrence  formulae  for, 
301,  312;  Schlafli's  integral  for,  298,  300;  second  kind  of,  310-314,  319,  320;  summation 
of  2;i»P„(2)  and  S/t''Q„(2),  296,  315;  zeros  of,  297,  310,  329.  See  also  Legendre  poly 
nomials  and  Legendre's  equation 

Legendre  polynomials  [P„(2)],  95,  296  ;   addition  formula  for,  320,  387;   degree  of,  296;   differ 
ential  equation  for,  198,  298  ;    expansion  in  ascending  series,  305 ;  expansion  in  descending 
series,  296,  328  ;    expansion  of  a  function  as  a  series  of,   304,   316,  324,   325,   326,   329 
expressed   by   Murphy  as   a    hypergeometric    function,   305,    306 ;    Heine's    expansion    of 
(t-2)~i   as   a  series  of,    315;    integral   connecting   Bessel    functions  with,  358;    integral 
properties  of,  219,  299 ;    Laplace's  equation  and,  384 ;    Laplace's   integrals   for,  306,  308 
Mehler-Dirichlet  integral  for,  308 ;    Neumann's   expansion   in    series  of,   316  ;    numerical 
inequality  satisfied  by,  297;  recurrence  formulae  for,  301,  303;  Rodrigues'  formula  for,  219 
297;    Schlafli's  integral  for,  297,298;    summation  of  ^/t»P„(£),  296;    zeros  of,  297,  310 
See  also  Legendre  functions 

Legendre's  relation  between  complete  elliptic  integrals,  513 

Lenmiscate  functions  [sin  lemn  </)  and  cos  lemu  <p],  517 


554  GENERAL   INDEX 

Liapounoff's  theorem  concerning  Fourier  constants,  175 

Limit,  condition  for  existence  of,  13 

Limit  of  a  function,  42;  of  a  sequence,  viii,  11,  12;  -point  (the  Bolzano-Weierstrass  theorem), 
13 

Limiting  circle,  98 

Limits,  greatest  of  and  least  of,  13 

Limit  to  the  value  of  a  complex  integral,  78 

Lindemann's  theory  of  Mathieu's  equation,  410 

Linear  differential  equations,  188-204  (Chapter  x),  379-396  (Chapter  xvni)  ;  exponents  of,  192 ; 
fundamental  system  of  solutions  of,  191,  194;  irregular  singularities  of,  191,  196;  ordinary 
point  of,  188;  regular  integral  of,  195  ;  regular  point  of,  191;  singular  points  of,  188,  191, 
(confluence  of)  196  ;  solution  of,  188,  191,  (uniqueness  of)  190 ;  special  types  of  equations  : 
— Bessel's  for  circular  cylinder  functions,  198,  336,  351,  352,  366;  Gauss'  for  hypergeo- 
metric  functions,  196,  201,277;  Gegenbauer's,  323  ;  Hermite's,  198,  836,  341;  Hill's,  399, 
406 ;  Jacobi's  for  Theta-functions,  463  ;  Lame's,  198 ;  Laplace's,  379,  381 ;  Legendre's  for 
zonal  and  surface  harmonics,  198,  298,  318  ;  Mathieu's  for  elliptic  cylinder  functions,  198, 
399 ;  Neumann's,  377 ;  Riemann's  for  P-functions,  200,  277,  285,  288 ;  Stokes',  198 ; 
Weber's  for  parabolic  cylinder  functions,  198,  203,  336,  341  ;  Whittaker's  for  confluent 
hypergeometric  functions,  331 ;  equation  for  conduction  of  Heat,  380 ;  equation  of  Tele- 
graphy, 380  ;  equation  of  wave  motions,  380,  390,  395  ;  equations  with  five  singularities  (the 
Klein-Bocher  theorem),  197 ;  equations  with  three  singularities,  200 ;  equations  with  two 
singularities,  202 ;  equations  with  r  singularities,  203 ;  equation  of  the  third  order  with 
regular  integrals,  204 

Liouville's  method  of  solving  integral  equations,  215 

Liouville's  theorem,  105,  424 

Logarithm,  533  ;  continuity  of,  533,  539 ;  differentiation  of,  534,  539  ;  expansion  of,  534,  539 ; 
of  complex  numbers,  539 

Logarithmic  derivate  of  the  Gamma-function  [^{z)],  234,  235;  Binet's  integrals  for,  242-245; 
circular  functions  and,  234  ;  Dirichlet's  integral  for,  241  ;  Gauss'  integral  for,  240 

Logarithmic  derivate  of  the  Riemann  Zeta-f unction,  273 

Logarithmic-integral  function  [Liz],  335 

Lower  integral,  61 

Lunar  perigee  and  node,  motions  of,  399 

Maclaurln's  (and  Euler's)  expansion,  127 ;  test  for  convergence  of  infinite  integrals,  71 ; 
theorem,  94 

Many-valued  functions,  106 

Mascheroni's  constant  [7],  229,  240,  242 

Mathematical  Physics,  equations  of,  197,  379-396  (Chapter  xviii).  See  aho  under  Linear  dif- 
ferential equations  and  the  names  of  special  equations 

Mathieu  functions  [ce„(2,  q),  se^^{z,  q),  in„(z,  7)],  397-421  (Chapter  xix)  ;  construction  of,  402, 
413  ;  convergence  of  series  in,  415  ;  even  and  odd,  400 ;  expansions  as  Fourier  series,  402, 
404,  418;  integral  equations  satisfied  by,  400,  402;  integral  formulae,  404;  order  of,  403; 
second  kind  of,  420 

Mathieu's  equation,  198,  397-421  (Chapter  xix)  ;  general  form,  solutions  by  Floquet,  405,  by 
Lindemann  and  Stieltjes,  410,  by  the  method  of  change  of  parameter,  417  ;  second  solution 
of,  406,  413,  420 ;  solutions  in  asymptotic  series,  418 ;  solutions  which  are  periodic,  see 
Mathieu  functions ;   the  integral  function  associated  with,  411.     See  also  Hill's  equation 

Mean-value  theorems,  65,  66,  96 

Mehler's  integral  for   Legendre  functions,  308 

Mellin's  (and  Barnes')  type  of  contour  integral,  280,  337 

Membranes,  vibrations  of,  389,  397,  398 

Mesh,  423 

Methods  of  '  summing '  series,  154-156 

Minding's  formula,  119 


GENERAL   INDEX  555 

Minimum  value  of  T{x),  247 

Modified  Helne-Borel  theorem,  53 

Modular  angle,  485 ;    function,  474,  (equation  connected  with)  475 ;  -surface,  41 

Modulus,  423  ;  of  a  complex  number,  8  ;  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions,  472,  485,  (complementary) 

472,  486 ;   periods  of  elliptic   functions  regarded  as  functions  of  the,  477,  491,  492,  494, 

514 
Monogenic,  83 

Motions  of  lunar  perigee  and  node,  399 
M-test  for  uniformity  of  convergence,  49 

Multiplication  formula  for  T(z),  234;  for  the  Sigma-f unction,  453 
Multiplication  of  absolutely  convergent  series,  29 ;  of  asymptotic  expansions,  152  ;  of  convergent 

series  (Abel's  theorem),  58,  59 
Multipliers  of  Theta-functions,  456 
Murphy's  formulae  for  Legendre  functions  and  polynomials,  305,  306 

Neumann's  definition  of  Bessel  functions   of   the  second  kind,   365 ;   expansions  in  series  of 

Legendre  and  Bessel  functions,  316,  367  ;  integral  for  the  Legendre  function  of  the  second 

kind,  314 ;  method  of  solving  integral  equations,  215 
Neumann's  function   [0„(2)],  368;   differential  equation  satisfied  by,  377;  expansion  of,  368; 

expansion  of  functions  in  series  of,  369,  377 ;   integral  for,  368 ;   integral  properties  of, 

378 ;  recurrence  formulae  for,  368 
Non-uniform  convergence,  44 ;  and  discontinuity,  47 
Normal  functions,  218 
Notations,    for    Bessel    functions,  350,  365 ;    for  Legendre   functions,  319,  320 ;    for  quotients 

and  reciprocals  of  elliptic  functions,  487;    for  Theta-functions,  457,  472,  480 
Nucleus  of  an  integral  equation,  207 ;  symmetric,  217,  222 
Numbers,  3-10  (Chapter  i) ;  basic,  455;   Bernoulli's,   126;   Cauchy's,  372;  characteristic,  213, 

(reality  of)  220;  complex,  6;  irrational,  6;  irrational-real,  5;  pairs  of,  6;  rational,  3,  4; 

rational-real,  5 ;  real,  5 

Odd  fanctions,  115,  171;   of  M&thien,- [se,^{z,  q]],  400 

Open,  44 

Order  (O  and  o),  11;  of  BemouUian  polynomials,  126;  of  Bessel  functions,  351;  of  elliptic 
functions,  425 ;  of  Legendre  functions,  318 ;  of  Mathieu  functions,  403 ;  of  poles  of  a 
function,  102 ;   of  terms  in  a  series,  24  ;  of  zeros  of  a  function,  94 

Ordinary  discontinuity,  42 

Ordinary  point  of  a  linear  differential  equation,  188 

Orthogonal  coordinates,  394 ;   functions,  218 

Oscillation,  11 

Parabolic  cylinder  functions  [7)„  (z)],  341  •  contour  integral  for,  343 ;  differential  equation  for, 
198,  203,  341 ;  expansion  in  a  power  series,  341 ;  expansion  of  a  function  as  a  series  of,  345; 
general  asymptotic  expansion  of,  342 ;  inequalities  satisfied  by,  348 ;  integral  equation 
satisfied  by,  225 ;  integral  properties,  344 ;  integrals  involving,  347 ;  integrals  repre- 
senting, 347;  properties  when  h  is  an  integer,  344,  347,  348;  recurrence  formulae,  344; 
relations  between  different  kinds  of  [l>,^{z)  and  D_„_i  (±J2)],  342;  zeros  of,  348.  See  also 
Weber's  equation 

Parallelogram  of  periods,  423 

Parameter,  change  of  (method  of  solving  Mathieu's  equation),  417;  connected  with  Theta- 
functions,  450;  of  a  point  on  a  curve,  435,  489,  490,  520,  523,  526;  of  third  kind  of 
elliptic  integral,  515  ;  thermometric,  398 

Parseval's  theorem,  177 

Partial  differential  equations,  property  of,  383,  384 ;  see  also  Linear  differential  equations 

Partition  function,  455 

Parts,  real  and  imaginary,  9 


556  GENERAL   INDEX 

Pearson's  function  [a^,  ,„  (z)],  347 

P-equatlon,  Riemann's,  200,  331  ;  connexion  with  the  hypergeometric  equation,  202,  277 ;  solu- 
tions of,  277,  285,  (relations  between)  288;  transformations  of,  201 

Periodic  coefficients,  equations  with  (Floquet's  theory  of),  405 

Periodic  functions,  integrals  involving,  112,  250.  -See  also  Fourier  series  and  Doubly  periodic 
functions 

Periodicity  factors,  456 

Periodicity  of  circular  and  exponential  functions,  535-537;  of  elliptic  functions,  422,  427, 
472,  493,  495,  496 ;  of  Theta-functions,  456 

Periodic  solutions  of  Mathieu's  equation,  400 

Period-parallelogram,  423  ;  fundamental,  423 

Periods  of  elliptic   functions,  422  ;   qua  functions  of   the  modulus,  477,  491,  492,  494,  514 

Pincherle's  functions  (modified  Legendre  functions),  329 

Plana' s  expansion,  145 

Pochhammer's  extension  of  Eulerian  integrals,  250 

Point,  at  infinity,   103 ;  limit-,  13  ;  representative,  9 ;  singular,  188,  196 

Poles  of  a  function,  102 ;  at  infinity,  104 ;  irreducible  set  of,  423 ;  number  in  a  cell,  424 ; 
relations  between  zeros  of  elliptic  functions  and,  426 ;  residues  at,  425,  497 ;  simple, 
102 

Polygon,  (fundamental)  of  automorphic  functions,  448 

Polynomials,  expressed  as  series  of  Legendre  polynomials,  304  ;  of  Abel,  347;  of  Bernoulli,  126  ; 
of  Legendre,  sec  Legendre  polynomials ;    of  Sonine,  346 

Popular  conception  of  an  angle,  539 ;  of  continuity,  42 

Positive  integers,  3 

Power  series,  29  ;  circle  of  convergence  of,  30 ;  continuity  of,  57,  (Abel's  theorem)  57  ;  expan- 
sions of  functions  in,  see  under  the  names  of  special  functions;  identically  vanishing,  58; 
Maclaurin's  expansion  in,  94;  radius  of  convergence  of,  30;  series  derived  from,  31; 
Taylor's  expansion  in,  93 ;    uniformity  of  convergence  of,  57 

Principal  part  of  a  function,  102 ;  solution  of  a  certain  equation,  475  ;  value  of  an  integral, 
75,  117  ;  value  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  number,  9,  538 

Principle  of  convergence,  viii,   14 

Pringsheim's  theorem  on  summation  of  double  series,  28 

Products  of  Bessel  functions,  372,  373,  376,  378,  421 ;  of  hypergeometric  functions,  292.  See 
also  Infinite  products 

Quarter  periods  K,  iK',  472,  491,  492,  494.     See  also  Elliptic  integrals 

Quartic,  canonical  form  of,  506 ;  integration  problem  connected  with,  445,  505 

Quasi-periodicity,  438,  440,  456 

Quotients  of  elliptic  functions  (Glaisher's  notation),  487,  504  ;  of  Theta-functions,  470 

Radius  of  convergence  of  power  series,  30 

Rational  functions,  105 ;  expansions  in  series  of,  134 

Rational  numbers,  3,  4 ;  -real  numbers,  5 

Real  functions  of  real  variables,  56 

Reality  of  characteristic  numbers,   220 

Real  numbers,  rational  and  irrational,  5 

Real  part  (JR)  of  a  complex  number,  9 

Rearrangement  of   convergent  series,   25  ;   of  double  series,  28 ;   of  infinite   determinants,  37 

Reciprocal  functions,  Volterra's,  212 

Reciprocals  of  elliptic  functions  (Glaisher's  notation),  487,  504 

Recurrence  formulae,  for  Bessel  functions,  353,  366,  366,  367;   for  confluent  hypergeometric 

functions,  346;   for  Gegenbauer's  function,  324;    for  Legendre  functions,   301,    303,  312; 

for  Neumann's  function,  368 ;  for  parabolic  cylinder  functions,  344.     Sec  also  Contiguous 

hypergeometric  functions 
Region,  44 


GENERAL   INDEX  557 

Regular,  83  ;  distribution  of  discontinuities,  206 ;  integrals  of  linear  differential  equations, 
195,  (of  the  third  order)  204 ;  points  (singularities)  of  linear  differential  equations,  191 

Relations  between  Bessel  functions,  354,  364;  between  confluent  hypergeometric  functions 
ir±t,^(±2)  and  M;^.,  ±m(^)'  ^■^O;  between  contiguous  hypergeometric  functions,  288;  be- 
tween parabolic  cylinder  functions  D,j(±2)  and  D_„_j  (±12),  342;  between  poles  and 
zeros  of  elliptic  functions,  426;  between  Riemann  Zeta-functions  f(«)  and  f(l-«),  263. 
See  also  Recurrence  formulae 

Remainder  after  n  terms  of  a  series,   15 ;  in  Taylor's  series,  95 

Removable  discontinuity,  42 

Repeated  integrals,  68,  75 

Representative  point,  9 

Eo5idues,   111-124  (Chapter  vi),  defined,  111 ;  of  elliptic  functions,  425,  497 

Riemann's  associated  function,  177,  178;  condition  of  integrability,  63;  equations  satisfied  by 
analytic  functions,  84;  hypothesis  concerning  ^{$),  266;  lemmas,  166,  178,  180;  P-equa- 
tion,  200,  277,  285,  288,  (transformation  of)  201,  (and  the  hypergeometric  equation)  202, 
see  also  Hypergeometric  functions  ;  theory  of  trigonometrical  series,  177-182  ;  Zeta- function, 
see  Zeta-function  (of  Riemann) 

Riesz'  method  of  '  summing '  series,  156 

Right  (R)  class,  4 

Rodrigues'  formula  for  Legendre  polynomials,  297 ;   modified,  for  Gegenbauer's  function,  323 

Roots  of  an  equation,  number  of,  120,  (inside  a  contour)  119,  123 ;  of  Weierstrassian  elliptic 
functions  (ei,  e^,  ^3),  436 

Saalschiitz'  integral  for  the  Gamma-function,  237 

Schlafli's  integral  for  Bessel  functions,  356,  366 ;  for  Legendre  polynomials  and  functions,  297, 
298,  300 ;  modified,  for  Gegenbauer's  function,  323 

ScMomilch's  expansion  in  series  of  Bessel  coefficients,  viii,  369;  integral  equation,  223 

Schmidt's  theorem,  217 

Schwarz'  lemma,  181 

Second  kind,  Bessel  function  of,  (Hankel's)  363,  (Neumann's)  365,  (modified)  367 ;  elliptic 
integral  of  [E  (xC),  Z  (u)],  510,  (complete)  511  ;  Eulerian  integral  of,  235,  (extended)  238  ; 
integral  equation  of,  207,  215;  Legendre  function  of,  310-314,  319,  320 

Second  mean-value  theorem,  66 

Second  solution  of  Bessel's  equation,  363,  365,  (modified)  367 ;  of  Legendre's  equation,  310 ;  of 
Mathieu's  equation,  406,  420;  of  the  hypergeometric  equation,  280,  (confluent  form)  337; 
of  Weber's  equation,  341 

Section,  4 

Seififert's  spherical  spiral,  520 

Sequences,  11  ;   decreasing,  12 ;   increasing,  12 

Series  (infinite  series),  15 ;  absolutely  convergent,  18  ;  change  of  order  of  terms  in,  25  ;  con- 
ditionally convergent,  18  ;  convergence  of,  15  ;  differentiation  of,  79,  92  ;  divergence  of,  15; 
geometric,  19 ;  integration  of,  78 ;  methods  of  summing,  154-156 ;  multiplication  of,  29, 
58,  59;  of  analytic  functions,  91;  of  cosines,  171;  of  cotangents,  139;  of  inverse  factorials, 
142;  of  powers,  see  Power  series;  of  rational  functions,  134;  of  sines,  172;  of  variable 
terms,  44  (see  also  Uniformity  of  convergence)  ;  order  of  terms  in,  24;  remainder  of,  15  ; 
representing  particular  functions,  sec  under  the  name  of  the  function;  solutions  of 
differential  and  integral  equations  in,  188-196,  222;  Taylor's,  93.  See  also  Asymptotic 
expansions.  Convergence,  Expansions,  Fourier  series,  Trigonometrical  series  and  Uniformity 
of  convergence 

Set,  irreducible  (of  zeros  or  poles),  423 

Sigma-functions  of  _\Veierstrass  [cr  (z),  0-1(2),  <ro{z),  cr^iz)],  440,  441;  addition  formula  for,  444, 
451,  453;  analogy  with  circular  functions,  440;  duplication  formulae,  452,  453;  four 
types  of,  441 ;  expression  of  elliptic  functions  by,  443  ;  quasi-periodic  properties,  440 ; 
singly  infinite  product  for,  441  ;  three-term  equation  involving,  445 ;  Theta-functions  con- 
nected with,  441,  466,  480  ;   triplication  formula,  452 


558  GENERAL   INDEX 

Signless  integers,  3 

Simple  curve,  43 ;    pole,  102  ;    zero,  94 

Simply- connected  region,  448 

Sine,  product  for,  137.     See  also  Circular  fimctions 

Sine-integral  [Si  (z)],  346,  -series  (Fourier  series),  172 

Singly -periodic  functions,  422.     See  also  Circular  functions 

Singularities,  83,  84,  103,  188,  191,  196;  at  infinity,  104;  confluence  of,  197,  331;  equations 
with  five,  197 ;  equations  with  three,  200,  204 ;  equations  with  two,  202 ;  equations  with 
)•,  203;  essential,  102,  104;  irregular,  191,  196;  regular,  191 

Singular  points  (singularities)  of  linear  differential  equations,  188,   196 

Solid  harmonics,  385 

Solution  of  Riemann's  P-equation  by  hypergeometric  functions,  277,  282 

Solutions  of  differential  equations,  see  Chapters  x,  xviii,  and  under  the  names  of  special 
equations 

Solutions  of  integral  equations,  see  Chapter  xi 

Sonine's  polynomial  [T^n'' (z)],  346 
Spherical  harmonics,  see  Harmonics 
Spherical  spiral,  Seiffert's,  520 

Spheroidal  harmonics,  396 

Squares  of  hypergeometric  functions,  ^9^;  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  (relations  between),  485; 

of  Theta-functions  (relations  between),   459 
Statement  of  Fourier's  theorem,  Dirichlet's,  167 

Steadily  tending  to  zero,  17 

Stieltjes'  theory  of  Mathieu's  equation,  410 

Stirling's  series  for  the  Gamma-f unction,  245 

Stokes'  equation,  198 

Stolz'  condition  for  convergence  of  double  series,  27 

Strings,  vibrations  of,  160 

Successive  substitutions,  method  of,  215 

Sum-formula  of  Euler  and  Maclaurin,  128 

Summahility,  methods  of,   154-156 ;    of  Fourier  series,  164  ;    uniform,  156 

Surface  harmonic,  385 

Surface,  modular,  41 

Surfaces,  nearly  spherical,  326 

Sylvester's  theorem  concerning  integrals  of  harmonics,  393 

Symmetric  nucleus,  217,  222 

Tabulation  of  Bessel  functions,  370;  of  complete  elliptic  integrals,  511;  of  Gamma-functions, 
247 

Taylor's  series,  93 ;   remainder  in,  95 

Teixeira's  extension  of  Burmann's  theorem,   131 

Telegraphy,  equation  of,  380 

Tests  for  convergence,  see  Infinite  integrals.  Infinite  products  and  Series 

Thermometric  parameter,  398 

Theta-functions  [^i  [z),  %2  {z),  ^3  [z),  ^4  (z)  or  ^  (z),  9  (;/)],  455-483  (Chapter  xxi) ;  abridged  nota- 
tion for  products,  461,  462  ;  addition  formulae,  460 ;  connexion  with  Sigma-functions,  441, 
466,  480 ;  duplication  formulae,  481 ;  expression  of  elliptic  functions  by,  466 ;  four  types 
of,  456  ;  fundamental  formulae  (Jacobi's),  460,  481  ;  infinite  products  for,  462,  466,  481  ; 
Jacobi's  first  notation,  9  (u)  and  H  (u),  472  ;  multipliers,  456  ;  notations,  457,  472,  480  ; 
parameters  q,  t,  456 ;  partial  differential  equation  satisfied  by,  463  ;  periodicity  factors, 
456 ;  periods,  456  ;  quotients  of,  470  ;  quotients  yielding  Jacobian  elliptic  functions,  471  ; 
relation  &i'  =  &2^3^4'  463;  squares  of  (relations  between),  459  ;  transformation  of,  (Jacobi's 
imaginary)  124,  467,  (Landen's)  469  ;  triplication  formulae  for,  483 ;  with  zero  argument 
(^2.  ^3,  ^4,  ^I'j.  457;   zeros  of,  458 

Third  kind  of  elliptic  integral,  IT  (u,  a),  515  ;    a  dynamical  application  of,  516 


GENERAL   INDEX  559 

Tliird  order,  linear  differential  equations  of,  204,  292,  411,  421 

Tliree  kinds  of  elliptic  integrals,  507 

•mree-term  equation  involving  Sigma-functions,  445 

Total  fluctuation,  57 

Transcendental  functions,  see  under  the  names  of  special  functions 

Transformations  of  elliptic  functions  and  Theta-functions,  501 ;   Jacobi's  imaginary,  467,  498, 

499,  512  ;    Landen's,  469,  500  ;   of  Eiemaun's  P-equation,  201 
Trigonometrical  equations,  537,  538 

Trigonometrical  integrals,  112,  257;   and  Gamma-functions,  250 
Trigonometrical  series,  160-187  (Chapter  ix) ;   convergence  of,   161 ;   values  of  coefficients  in, 

163 ;   Riemanu's  theory  of,  177-182.     See  also  Fourier  series 
Triplication  formulae  for  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  and  E  (ii),  523,  527 ;  for  Sigma-functions, 

452;   for  Theta-functions,  483;    for  Zeta-functions,  452 
Twenty-four  solutions  of  the  hypergeometric  equation,  278 ;  relations  between,  279,  282,  284 
Two-dimensional  continuum,  43 
Two  variables,  continuous  functions  of,  67  ;   hypergeometric  functions  (Appell's)  of,  294 

Unicursal,  448 

Uniformisation,  447  . 

Uniformising  variable,  448 

Uniformity,  concept  of,  52 

Uniformity  of  continuity,  54  ;  of  summability,  156 

Uniformity  of  convergence,  41-60  (Chapter  iii),  defined,  44 ;  of  Fourier  series,  169 ;  of  infinite 
integrals,  70,  72,  73 ;  of  infinite  products,  49  ;  of  power  series,  57 ;  of  series,  44,  (condi- 
tion for)  45,  (Hardy's  test  for)  50,  (Weierstrass'  iH-test  for)  49 

Uniformly  convergent  infinite  integrals,  properties  of,  73;  series  of  analytic  functions,  91, 
(differentiation  of)  92 

Uniqueness  of  an  asymptotic  expansion,  154  ;  of  solutions  of  linear  differential  equations,  190 

Upper  bound,  55 ;  integral,  61 

Upper  limit,  integral  equation  with  variable,  207,  215 ;  to  the  value  of  a  complex  integral, 
78,  91 

Value,  absolute,  see  Modulus ;  of  the  argument  of  a  complex  number,  9,  538 ;  of  the  co- 
efficients in  trigonometrical  series,  163 ;  of  particular  hypergeometric  functions,  275,  287, 
292,  295;  of  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  of  i/iT,  ^iA",  ^{K+iK'),  493,  499,  500;  of  K,  K' 
for  special  values  of  k,  514,  517,  518  ;  of  f  (s)  for  special  values  of  s,  261,  263 

Vanishing  of  power  series,  58 

Variable,  uniformising,  448;  terms  (series  of),  see  Uniformity  of  convergence;  upper  limit, 
integral  equation  with,  207,  215 

Vibrations  of  air  in  a  sphere,  391 ;  of  circular  membranes,  389 ;  of  elliptic  membranes,  397, 
398;   of  strings,  160 

Volterra's  integral  equation,  215 ;   reciprocal  functions,  212 

Wave  motions,  equation  of,  380 ;  general  solution,  390,  395 ;  solution  involving  Bessel 
functions,  390 

Weber's  equation,   198,  203,  336,  341.     See  also  Parabolic  cylinder  functions 

Weierstrass'  factor  theorem,  137 ;  3/-test  for  uniform  convergence,  49 ;  product  for  the 
Gamma-function,  229  ;   theorem  on  limit  points,  13 

Weierstrassian  elliptic  function  [^(2)],  422-454  (Chapter  xx),  defined  and  constructed,  4:25, 
426  ;  addition  theorem  for,  433,  (Abel's  method)  435 ;  analogy  with  circular  functions, 
431;  definition  of  {(^[z)-  e^)^,  444;  differential  equation  for,  429;  discriminant  of,  437; 
duplication  formula,  434  ;  expression  of  elliptic  functions  by,  441 ;  expression  of  ^(z)  -  ^t)  (y) 
by  Sigma-functions,  444  ;  half-periods,  437  ;  homogeneity  properties,  432  ;  integral  formula 
for,    430 ;    integration    of   irrational    functions    by,   445  ;    invariants    of,    430 ;    inversion 


560  GENERAL   INDEX 

problem  for,  477;  Jacobian  elliptic  functions  and,  498;  periodicity,  427;  roots  ej,  62,  63, 
436.     See  also  Sigma-functlons  and  Zeta-function  (of  Weierstrass) 

WMttaker's  function  'Fj.,  „j(z),  see  Confluent  hypergeometric  functions 

Wronski's  expansion,  viii,  147 

Zero  argument,  Thetafunctions  with,  457;  relation  between,  463 

Zero  of  a  function,  94 ;  at  infinity,  104  ;   simple,  94 

Zeros  of  a  function  and  poles  (relation  between),  426 ;  connected  with  zeros  of  its  derivate, 
121,  123;  irreducible  set  of,  423;  number  of,  in  a  cell,  424;  order  of,  94 

Zeros  of  functions,  (Bessel's)  354,  360,  371,  373,  (Legendre's)  297,  310,  329,  (parabolic 
cylinder)  34:8,  (Eiemann's  Zeta-),  262,  263,  266,  (Theta-)  458 

Zeta-function,  Z  (m),  (of  Jacobi),  611;  addition  formula  for,  511;  connexion  with  E  (u),  511; 
Fourier  series  for,  513 ;  Jacobi's  imaginary  transformation  of,  512.  See  also  Jacobian 
elliptic  functions 

Zeta-function,  f  (s),  f(s,  a),  (of  Riemann)  259-274  (Chapter  xiii),  (generalised  by  Hurwitz)  259; 
Euler's  product  for,  265  ;  Hermite's  integral  for,  263 ;  Hurwitz'  integral  for,  262 ;  in- 
equalities satisfied  by,  268,  269 ;  logarithmic  derivate  of,  273 ;  Riemann's  hypothesis 
concerning,  266 ;  Riemann's  integrals  for,  260,  267 ;  Riemann's  relation  connecting  f  (s) 
and  f{l-s),  263;    values  of,  for  special  values  of  s,  261,  263;  zeros  of,  262,  263,  266 

Zeta-function,  f(z),  (of  Weierstrass),  438;  addition  formula,  439;  analogy  with  circular 
functions,  439;  constants  rji.  172  connected  with,  439;  duplication  formulae  for,  452;  ex- 
pression of  elliptic  functions  by,  442  ;  quasi-periodicity,  438  ;  triplication  formulae,  452. 
See  also  Weierstrassian  elliptic  functions 

Zonal  harmonics,  296 


CAMBRUjGE  :     PKINTED    JiY    JOHN    CLAY,    M.A.,    AT    THE    UNIVERSITY    PRESS. 


^^ 


SELECTION   FROM  THE  GENERAL  CATALOGUE 
OF  BOOKS   PUBLISHED  BY 

THE   CAMBRIDGE  UNIVERSITY   PRESS 

A  Treatise  on  the  Analytical  Dynamics  of  Particles  and  Rigid  Bodies ; 

with  an  Introduction  to  the  Problem  of  Three  Bodies.     By  E.  T.  Whittakek,  M.A. 
Royal  8vo.     12s  6d  net. 

AbePs  Theorem  and  the  Allied  Theory,  including  the  Theory  of  the 

Thota  Functions.     By  H.  F.  Baker,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.,  Lowndean  Professor  of  Astronomy 
and  Geometry  in  the  University  of  Cambridge.     Royal  8vo.     25s  net. 

Lectures  on  the  Differential  Geometry  of  Curves  and  Surfaces.     By 

A.  R.  Forsyth,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.,  Chief  Professor  of  Mathematics  in  the  Imperial  College 
of  Science  and  Technology,  London.     Large  Royal  8vo.     21s  net. 

Theory  of  Differential  Equations.      By  A.  R.  Forsyth,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S. 

Demy  Bvo. 

Part  1.     Exact  Equations  and  Pfaflf's  Problem.     10s  net. 
Part  II.     Ordinary  Equations,  not  linear.     In  two  volumes.     20s  net. 
Part  III.     Ordinary  Linear  Equations.     In  one  volume.     12s  6d  net. 
Part  IV.     Partial  DiflFerential  Equations.     In  two  volumes.     25s  net. 

Theory  of  Functions  of  a  Complex  Variable.      By  A.   R.   Forsyth, 

Sc.D.,  F.R.S.     Second  edition.     Royal  Bvo.     21s  net. 

Lectures  introductory  to  the  Theory  of  Functions  of  two  Complex 
Variables,  delivered  to  the  University  of  Calcutta  during  January  and  February, 
1913.     By  A.  R.  Forsyth,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.     Royal  8vo.     10s  net. 

The  Analytical  Theory  of  Heat.  By  Joseph  Fourier.  Translated, 
with  Notes,  by  A.  Freeman,  M.A.     Demy  8vo.     12s. 

A  Course  of  Pure  Mathematics.  By  G.  H.  Hardy,  M.A.,  F.R.S.,  Fellow 
and  Lecturer  of  Trinity  College,  Cambridge.  Demy  8vo.  Second  edition,  revised. 
12s  net. 

The  Thirteen  Books  of  Euclid's  Elements.  Translated  from  the  text 
of  Heiberg.  With  Introduction  and  Commentary.  By  Sir  Thomas  L.  Heath,  K.C.B., 
F.R.S.,  Sc.D.     Royal  8vo.     In  thi-ec  volumes.     42s  net. 

The  Theory  of  Functions  of  a  Real  Variable  and  the  Theory  of 
Fourier's  Series.  By  E.  W.  Hobson,  Sc.D.,  LL.D.,  F.R.S.,  Sadleirian  Professor 
of  Pure  Mathematics,  and  Fellow  of  Christ's  College,  Cambridge.  Royal  8vo. 
21s  net. 

Combinatory  Analysis.  By  Major  Percy  A.  Macmahon,  F.R.S.,  D.Sc, 
LL.D.     Volume  I.     Royal  Bvo.     15s  net. 

A  New  Analysis  of  Plane  G-eometry,  Finite  and  Differential.  With 
numerous  examples.     B}'  A.  W.  11.  Thompson,  B.A.     Demy  Bvo.     7s  net. 

The  Analytical  Theory  of  Light.     By  James   Walker,  M.A.,  Christ 

Church,  Oxford,   Demonstrator   of   Physics   in    the   Clarendon    Laboratory,    Oxford. 
Royal, Bvo.     15s  net. 

Principia  Mathematica.     By  A.  N.  Whitehead,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.,  and  the 

Hon    Bektrand    Russkll,  M.A.,  F.R.S.     Large  Royal  Bvo.      Volume  I.     25s  net. 
Volume  II.    30s  net.     Volume  III.    21s  net. 

The  Theory  of  Sets  of  Points.     By  W.  H.  Young,  M.A.,  Sc.D.,  Lecturer 

in  Higher  Analysis  in  the   University  of  Liverpool,  and  Grace  Chisholm  Young, 
Phil.  Doc.     Demy  8vo.     12s  net. 

[p.  T.  o. 


CAMBRIDGE  TRACTS   ON   MATHEMATICS  AND 
MATHEMATICAL  PHYSICS 

General  Editors — 
J.  G.  Leathem,  M.A.,  and  G.  H.  Hardy,  M.A.,  F.R.S. 

No.  1.    Surface  and  Volume  Integrals  used  in  Physics.    By 

J.    G.    Leathem,    M.A.     Demy   8vo.       Second  edition,   with  two  additional 
sections.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  2.    The  Integration  of  Functions  of  a  Single  Variable. 

By  G.  H.  Hardy,  M.A.,  F.R.S.     Demy  8vo.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  3.    Quadratic  Forms  and  their  Classification  by  means  of 
Invariant  Factors.    By  T.  J.  I'A.  Bromwich,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.    Demy  8vo. 

3s  6d  net. 

No.  4.     The  Axioms  of  Projective  Geometry.   By  A.  N.  White- 
head, Sc.D.,  F.R.S.     Demy  8vo.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  5.    The  Axioms  of  Descriptive  Geometry.  By  A.  N.  White- 
head, Sc.D.,  F.R.S.     Demy  8vo.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  6.     Algebraic  Equations.    By  G.  B.  Mathews,  M.A.,  F.R.S. 

Demy  8vo.      2s  6d  net. 

No.  7.     The  Theory  of  Optical  Instruments.    By  E.  T.  Whit- 
taker,  M.A.,  F.R.S.     Demy  8vo.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  8.    The  Elementary  Theory  of  the  Symmetrical  Optical 

Instrument.     By  J.  G.  Leathem,  M.A.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  9.    Invariants    of   Quadratic    Differential    Forms.      By 

J.  E.  Wright,  M.A.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  10.    An  Introduction  to  the  Study  of  Integral  Equations. 

By  Maxime  Bocuer,  B.A.,  Ph.D.     Second  edition.      2s  6d  net. 

No.  11.    The    Fundamental    Theorems    of  the   Differential 

Calculus.     By  W.  H.  YouN(;,  Sc.D.,  F.R.S.     2s  6#net. 

No.    12.      Orders    of    Infinity:     The    " Infinitarcalcul"    of 

Paul  Du  Bois-Reymond.     By  G.  H.  Hardy,  M.A.,  F.R.S.     2s  6d  net. 

No.  13.    The  Twenty-Seven  Lines  upon  the  Cubic  Surface. 

By  Archibald  Henderson,  M.A.,  Ph.D.     4s  6d  net. 
No.  14.     The  Twisted  Cubic,  with  some  account  of  the  Metrical 

Properties  of  the  Cubical  Hyperbola.     By  P.  W.  Wood,  M.A.      2s  6d  net. 

No.  15.     Complex  Integration  and  Cauchy's  Theorem.    By 

G.  N.  Watson,  M.A.     3s  net. 

No.  16.     Linear  Algebras.     By  L.  E.  Dickson,  Ph.D.     3s  net. 
No.  17.    The  Propagation  of  Disturbances  in  Dispersive'Media. 

By  T.  H.  Havelock,  D.Sc,  F.R.S.     3s  6d  net. 

No.  18.     The    General    Theory    of   Dirichlet's    Series.     By 

G.  H.  Hardy,  F.R.S.,  and  Marcel  Riesz,  Dr.Phil.     3s  6d  net. 

Cambridge    University    Press 
C.  F.  Clay,  Manager :    Fetter  Lane,  London 


'^^ 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SUPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY 


B&A^Sci.