0:
m
WM
mm
No...iL^.....rX,....#:.
Boston
Medical Library
Association,
19 BOYLSTON PLACE,
Received
tfjZtfif
&&D.
v*r > .,
■23,.4-V
A MODERN CINERARY URN.
(Frontispiece.)
THE
CREMATION OF THE DEAD
CONSIDERED
FROM AN ^ESTHETIC, SANITARY, RELIGIOUS, HISTORICAL,
MEDICO-LEGAL, AND ECONOMICAL
STANDPOINT
HUGO ERICHSEN, M.D.
Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Kings-
ton, Canada; Member of the Committee of Organization of the
First International Cremation Congress; Corresponding
Member of the Cremation Societies of New York and
Berlin; Foreign Associate Member of the Hy-
gienic Society of France; Honorary
Member of the Cremation Soci-
ety of Milan, Italy; etc.
SEttlj an Etttrotiuctorg Note
Sir T. SPENCER WELLS, Bart., F.R.S.
Late President of the Royal College of Surgeons of England;
Surgeon to the Queen's Household; etc.
ILLUSTRATED
Delenda est inhumatio!
DETROIT
D. O. HAYNES & COMPANY
1887
H-frJ
" Why should we seek to clothe death with unnecessary terror, and
spread horror round the tomb of those we love 1 The grave should be
surrounded with everything that might ensure tenderness and venera-
tion." — Washington Irving.
"Die Leichenverbrennung verdient die Achtung, welche ihr um ihres
hohen Werthes willen ini klassischen Alterthum gezollt wurde, auch
heute noch, da sie die einzige Art der Todtenbestattung ist, die vor den
schrecklichen Folgen der Verwesungsduenste sichert und das bei der
Leichenbeerdigung so oft vorgekommene Wiedererwachen im Grabe
verhuetet." — J. P. Trusen.
"Si nous sommes une statue
Sculptee a l'image de Dieu ;
Quand cette image est abattue,
Jetons-en les debris au feu !
Toi, forme immortelle, remonte
Dans la flamme, aux sources du Beau,
Sans que ton argile ait la honte
Et les miseres du tombeau ! "
— Theophile Gautier.
Copyright, 1887,
By Hugo Erichsen.
J. S. Cushing & Co., Printers, Boston.
TO
WILLIAM EASSIE, C.E., F.L.S.,
Honorary Secretary of the Cremation Society of England,
and
DR. PROSPER DE PIETRA-SANTA,
of Paris,
THIS VOLUME IS DEDICATED
as a mark of high esteem, and in recognition of their untiring
labor in behalf of that greatest of all sanitary
reforms, cremation, by their
sincere admirer,
THE AUTHOR.
PREFACE.
]~ T is hardly necessary to explain the purpose of this
-L- work. It is an appeal to the general public ; a plea
for the burning of the dead. The period of fierce and
fanatic opposition to cremation has passed, and made
way for a calm consideration of the subject. In 1874
a Persian gentleman, then a resident of one of the
Eastern States of our own free and great republic, who
wanted to have his wife cremated, was compelled by an
ignorant mob to resort to interment. Happily we are
over that now.
It is astonishing that the cremation question has not
been taken hold of by the literarians of our country ;
there is hardly a subject that rewards its student so
well as cremation, and future writers on incineration,
not hampered by the literary inexperience under which
I have labored, will reap a rich harvest indeed when
they devote their talent and time to the reform.
I would counsel those who are in favor of cremation
to immediately put in writing their desire to have their
body committed to the flames after death instead of
having it consigned to "dirt and darkness." Such writ-
ten requests should be preserved in places where they
can be easily found after decease ; for instance, in the
writing-desk. If every individual promotor of the re-
form, male or female, considering the uncertainty of
life, would follow this advice, cremation would speedily
prevail.
Vlll PREFACE.
I am sensible of the many defects of this book, but I
trust that it will be found to furnish some useful infor-
mation which cannot well be obtained elsewhere, be-
sides proving an assistance to those who are desirous of
stud}7ing the question more fully.
I desire to express my indebtedness to crematists in
all parts of the world for the valuable assistance I re-
ceived from them in the preparation of this volume.
For all who like cleanliness, for all who love true
sentiment, for all friends of economy, for all who ven-
erate their dead, and for all who are not afraid of re-
formj the following pages were written.
It only remains to express the thanks due the follow-
ing gentlemen for permission to use illustrations with-
out which this book would have been decidedly in-
complete : Messrs. Dodd, Mead & Co., Cyrus K. Rem-
ington, Augustus Cobb, Albert Meininger, and Dr. M.
L. Davis.
H. E.
Detroit, Feb. 28, 1887.
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
PAGE
The History of Cremation 1
CHAPTER IT.
The Evils of Burial; the Sanitary Aspect of Incin-
eration 66
CHAPTER III.
Cremation in Times of War 129
CHAPTER IV.
The Processes of Modern Cremation , 140
CHAPTER V.
The Medico-legal Aspect of Incineration. — The Ob-
jections to Cremation 157
CHAPTER VI.
Burial Alive. — Cremation from an ^Esthetic and
Religious Point of View 180
CHAPTER VII.
The Economy of Cremating the Dead. — The Present
State of the Cremation Question 224
INTRODUCTION.
Dr. H. Erichsen:
Bear Sir, — In reply to your request that I should
write an introduction to a work which you are about
to compose on cremation, I am placed in the great
difficulty of knowing nothing of your book, not even
having seen its title-page or table of contents. It is
quite impossible, therefore, for me to say how far your
views and my own may accord. But, as I suppose your
object is to bring before the people of America proof of
the evil effects to the living inseparable from the pres-
ent mode of disposal of the dead by burying them in
the earth, as well ^as to show how these evils may be
avoided by burning dead bodies, — in a word, by the
substitution of cremation for burial, of purification for
putrefaction, — I have great pleasure in doing the little
that is in my power to assist in bringing a very impor-
tant question of sanitary reform before a thoughtful,
intelligent, and advancing nation.
I do not know how far I am right in supposing that
with you in the West, as with us in the East, a knowl-
edge of sanitary science, of the conditions which are
necessary for the health of mankind, is still confined to
the comparatively few who may be called the well edu-
cated class. Nor do I know how far this knowledge
has been diffused among the classes of your population
who have received but little education. But I do know
Xll INTRODUCTION.
that with us it is the highest classes, in the sense of the
best educated classes, who are the most earnest in their
efforts to disseminate that branch of knowledge or
science which, in the words of Parkes, aims at render-
ing "youth most perfect, decay less rapid, life more
vigorous, and death more remote." Parkes is dead,
but he still speaks to us by his book, and he says : —
" The disposal of the dead is always a question of
difficulty. If the dead are buried, so great at last is
the accumulation of bodies that the whole country
round a great city becomes gradually a vast cemetery.
After death, the buried body returns to its elements.
If, instead of being buried, the body is burned, the same
process occurs more rapidly. A community must al-
ways dispose of its dead, either by burial in land or
water, or by burning, or chemical destruction equiva-
lent to burning, or by embalming or preserving. The
eventual dispersion of our frame is the same in all
cases. Neither affection nor religion can be outraged
by any manner of disposal of the dead which is done
with proper solemnity and respect to the earthly dwell-
ing-places of our friends. The question should be
entirely placed on sanitary grounds. Burying in the
ground appears certainly to be the most insanitary
plan."
Parkes died before we had learned how perfectly and
cheaply, how rapidly and inoffensively cremation could
be carried on ; and he favored burying in the sea rather
than in the earth, whenever the distance was not too
great for transport. He knew well how impossible it
is to prevent graveyards within towns, or suburban
cemeteries, from becoming sooner or later a source of
danger or nuisance to the living, how difficult it is to
INTRODUCTION. Xlll
find a suitable site and soil, sufficient space, and to
secure proper regulations and management. These
difficulties may not be so great amid your unlimited
space as with us ; but they must be an increasing evil
in and around your large cities. I trust, therefore,
that your work may assist in the more rapid progress
of cremation as a substitute for burial.
With us the legal objection has ceased. It is now
acknowledged by the government, and has been de-
cided by three judges that if cremation is so performed
as to create no nuisance, and incite to no breach of
the peace, it is not illegal.
The religious objection has been answered by the
Bishop of Manchester, by Canon Liddon, and by the
Earl of Shaftesbury. The bishop said : " No intelligent
faith can suppose that any Christian doctrine is affected
by the manner in which this mortal body of ours crum-
bles into dust and sees corruption."
Canon Liddon said, in a sermon at St. Paul's Cathe-
dral : —
" The resurrection of a body from its ashes is not a
greater miracle than the resurrection of an unburnt
body ; each must be purely miraculous."
Lord Shaftesbury said to me that any doubt as to the
resurrection of a body because it had been burnt was
an " audacious limitation of the Almighty " ; and he
asked, " What, then, has become of the blessed martyrs
who were burned at the stake in ancient and modern
persecution ? "
The medico-legal objection that murdered or poisoned
persons if burned could not be exhumed, as is some-
times done if suspicion of foul play arise after burial, is
answered by the strict observance of proper regulations
XIV INTRODUCTION.
before cremation. -Much .more complete medical cer-
tificates as to the cause, of death ..are -Tequired by the
cremation society of "England than by any cemetery
company; and in some cases, a post-mortem examina-
tion is insisted on. In this way, cremation becomes a
security to the public against secret poisoning or any
form of murder.
The sentimental objection is that which can only be
overcome by time and education. When the people
know how great are the evils dependent on burial in
the earth, even when this is done under the most favor-
able conditions, how seldom these conditions can be
secured, and, when the knowledge becomes general
that when a human body which would require five,
ten, or twenty years to slowly putrefy in any soil can
in one hour be cheaply and inoffensively converted into
a white ash, public sentiment must favor cremation in
place of corruption, and for putrefaction substitute
purification. The same religious ceremonial might
accompany either mode of disposal of the dead. The
ashes might be dispersed to the winds, harmlessly
buried, or preserved in urns near monuments or memo-
rial tablets in our cemeteries, or beneath or around any
place of worship, or in any family mausoleum, or in
some park, public garden, or any ornamental open
space near a great city, as the wishes of the dead or of
the surviving relations and friends may prefer.
Here, we hope the city of London will be the first
municipal body in the Kingdom to set the example in
this sanitary reform. But, perhaps, the impetus may
be given by our American cousins and brothers.
I am, dear sir, faithfully yours,
T. SPENCER WELLS.
' JAN 5 1888 r
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION.
Ye in the age gone by,
Who ruled the world — a world how lovely then
And guided still the steps of happy men
In the light leading-strings of careless joy !
Before the bed of death
No ghastly spectre stood — but from the porch
Of life, the lip — one kiss inhaled the breath,
And the mute, graceful genius lowered a torch !
Schiller : The Gods of Greece.
"DRIMEVAL man most likely disposed of his dead
-L by carrying them into the woods or leaving them
anywhere above ground, a prey to animals of all kinds.
But soon the organs of sight and smell took offense
at the mutilated and decayed corpses, and they were
buried. With the increase of population it became
necessary to render the dead innocuous to the living,
and then, perhaps, cremation was originally resorted to
as a means of protecting the living from the effects of
corruption.
In the early stages of the world's history, when there
was plenty of available land, interment was of course a
very cheap process, and therefore often resorted to by
the poorer classes, but persons of intelligence and educa-
tion always preferred incineration as the better method
of clisposi::j cf dead bodies.
In the gradual growth among scientists of the belief
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
A ROMAN COLUMBARIUM.
THE HISTORY OE CREMATION. 3
that cremation is preferable to the present system of
inhumation, is seen another instance of modern civiliza-
tion borrowing the ideas of the far-distant past.
The pendulum by which the world's age is measured
swings in an immense arc. Now, after thousands of
years, the views of the leaders of human thought are
swinging back to that expressed by some of the earliest
peoples.
Incineration is a most ancient practice. It has always
been a matter of difficulty to ascertain the origin of
ancient customs. In the case of cremation the histo-
rians have not been able to discover the date when it
was first practiced. The history of ancient crema-
tion, however, can be traced to nearly 2000 years be-
fore Christ. Incineration is regarded by some authors
as the outcome of the sun-worship of the Phoenicians.
Their solar god (Helios) — the Melikertes of the Greeks
— was represented by them as burning himself, whereby
they wanted to indicate the ever-returning solar year.
Among the ancient nations, the sun was especially re-
vered and worshipped by the Persians, Egyptians, and
the Sabian Arabs. At Heliopolis, Phoenicia, and Pal-
myra, Syria, there were celebrated temples consecrated
to the sun. In some of the countries mentioned, horses
which were, on account of their celerity, regarded as
symbols of the sun were sacrificed to this celestial body.
Some authors ascribe the origin of cremation to
the self-immolation of Hercules. Dr. Le Moyne, the
founder of the first crematorium erected in the United
States, asserted that the first authenticated case of
burning the dead was the proposed incineration of
Isaac, and that, although it was not consummated, it
was fully authorized by the Deity. In consequence he
4 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
argues that cremationists stand in the shadow of the
Lord, and that any one who opposes them commits a
sacrilege.
I do not believe that incineration, as some of its
antagonists have imputed, had its origin in a heathen
religion, but I am quite certain, from existing evidence,
that it was originally resorted to upon sanitary grounds,
and as a means to protect the living against corruption.
It may be possible that incremation owes its origin
to the ancient nomadic tribes that burnt their dead and
carried the ashes with them. Among agricultural peo-
ples, those who died in war, and while hunting, were
sometimes consigned to the flames, either because the
grave would not protect them from wild animals, or
because it was desired to return the ashes to the rela-
tives, who would keep them sacred.
The origin of incineration, as appears from what I
have said, is surrounded with a great deal of obscurity.
It is, however, an established fact that the Orient was
the birthplace of cremation.
The Egyptians first buried their dead, then embalmed
them, and, according to Walker, at a period not stated,
abolished embalming and substituted burning. They
performed incineration by placing the corpse in an ami-
anthus receptacle, which, remaining intact, kept the
bones apart from the fuel.
The tombs of the. Assyrians, discovered on the banks
of the Tigris and Euphrates, furnish us with unmistak-
able evidence of the fact that the burning of the dead
was not unknown to them. The same applies to the
Babylonians. The tombs of both peoples when explored
were found to contain urns holding human bones and
ashes; these urns were often very large, being some-
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 5
times of sufficient size to admit the body of an adult.
The Persians either burned their dead or dissolved
them in aqua fortis. Yet they also practiced burial in
deep sepulchres that had niches in which the bodies
were deposited upon slabs.
The Hebrews commonly interred their deceased, but
incineration was likewise practiced. The Mosaic code
prescribed that those who transgressed the laws of
wedlock and chastity should be put to death by fire.
In I. Moses xxxviii. 24, we find the first evidence of
this. The third book of Moses, xx. 14 and xxi. 9, also
bears testimony to this fact. Thus we see that cinera-
tion was looked upon by this people of antiquity in the
early period of its history as a punishment for offenders
against the married state and chastity. It is barely pos-
sible (deductions one may draw from certain passages
in the books of Moses) that the ancient Jews first
stoned these disobedients, then burned their bodies
publicly, and finally erected a so-called mound of in-
famy over their remains.
But as we follow Hebrew history, we soon find that
cremation was transformed from a humiliating act of
punition to the highest honor, to a distinction that was
only accorded to royalty. The first king of Israel was
cremated after the battle with the Philistines in Mount
Gilboa, where he and his three sons fell. The Holy
Bible relates how, when the inhabitants of Jabesh-
gilead heard of that which the Philistines had done to
Saul (I. Samuel xxxi. 12) : " All the valiant men arose,
and went all night, and took the bodies of Saul and the
bodies of his sons from the wall of Beth-shan, and came
to Jabesh and burnt them there."
And verse 13 of the same chapter informs us : " And
6 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
they took their bones (ossilegio) and buried them under
a tree at Jabesh and fasted seven days."
Asa, king of Judah, was also consigned to the funeral
pyre, as we glean from II. Chronicles xvi. 14 : " And
they buried him in his own sepulchres, which he had
made for himself in the city of David, and laid him in the
bed which was filled with sweet odors and divers kinds of
spices prepared by the apothecaries' art ; and they made
a very great burning of him." Of Asa's grandson, King
Jehoram, it is said that his people cremated him not
like his fathers, because he had furthered idolatry.
On the other hand, Isaiah xxx. 33 refers to a large
pyre that was kept alight to consume the bodies of the
deceased : " For Tophet is ordained of old ; yea, for the
king it is prepared ; he hath made it deep and large ;
the pile thereof is fire and much wood; the breath of
the Lord like a stream of brimstone doth kindle it."
Jeremiah (xxxiv. 5) prophesied of Zedekiah, another
king of Judah, that he would be burned with the same
honors that attended the cremation of his predecessors.
And in Amos vi. 10, we find the following, which also
points to incineration: "And a man's uncle shall take
him up, and he that burneth him, to bring out the bones
out of the house," etc.
The last passage cited and the one mentioning the
Vale of Tophet, are construed by some writers as mean-
ing that the ancient Jews had recourse to cremation in
great plagues ; id est, for hygienic reasons.
Now, although these quotations plainly show that the
Israelites of old did execute incineration, we also learn
from them that the practice was never general ; at first
confined to criminals, at last to kings.
It is impossible to determine when the custom of
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. T
burning the dead originated among the Hindoos. It
was always connected with religious observances, and
known to the people of India since the earliest times.
It was restricted to certain classes or castes : mainly to
brahmins and warriors. The merchants, mechanics, and
the tillers of the soil were interred. Children under
two years of age were barred from cremation, and had
to be buried in the earth. Some religious sects, how-
ever, were an exception from this rule and executed
cineration indiscriminately — for instance the believers
in Vishnu. When a Hindoo died away from home, or
when his body was lost and could not be found, his
relatives instituted a symbolical ceremony. They
gathered 360 leaves of a certain shrub and as many
woolen threads. The}^ were under the impression that
the human body consisted of 360 parts. Of the threads
and leaves they formed a figure, somewhat resembling
the human form, which was wound round with a strip
of the hide of a black antelope, which had also been
previously wrapped closely round with woolen thread.
This figure was then besmeared with barley-meal and
water and burnt as an effigy of the missing body.
From India cremation extended to Europe, and was
adopted by all Indo-Germanic peoples. This was proven
by Prof. Jacob Grimm in an oration on the burning of
the dead, delivered before the Royal Academy of
Sciences at Berlin, in 1849, in which the famous scholar
highly commended the ancient custom.
In old tombs on the island of Malta, urns of a kind
of clay containing ashes, lachrymatories, several mort-
uary lamps (some of excellent workmanship), and the
model of a mummy, formed of a green semi-transparent
substance, were found. This discovery demonstrates
8 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
that the orientals who inhabited this isle of the Medi-
terranean in the earliest times were in the habit of
cremating their deceased.
The Thracians were the next to embrace burial by
fire. Of them Herodotus relates that they exhibited the
corpse publicly for three days, brought many offerings,
and bewailed the deceased. At the termination of the
period stated, they cremated the body and then buried
the ashes and bones. After they had erected a mound
over the remains, they played gymnic games.
From Asia, by way of Thrace, cremation reached
Greece. Among the Greeks burial was originally
exceedingly primitive, as we learn from a law that com-
pelled passers-by to place a handful of earth upon the
breast of every unburied corpse. Interment undoubt-
edly preceded cremation in Greece. Heraclitus ad-
vanced the theory that everything in existence was
created from fire. Therefore he argued that all corpses
must be burned to free the soul from all material
matter, and to return it to its primitive elements.
According to JSustachius Hercules burned the body of
Argius, the son of Likymnios, 1500 years before Christ.
He had promised the father to return the youth, but
when the latter fell in mortal combat, nothing remained
for him but to cremate Argius and to bring home with
him the ashes to the sorrowful parent. Hercules was
unquestionably the first to cremate himself. When he
was tormented by the pangs of approaching death, he
built a pyre and ordered his servant to ignite it. When
the servant failed to set the wood afire, Hercules de-
scended from the pyre, kindled it himself and again
mounted it to await his fate.
Pliny was disposed to attribute the origin of incinera-
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION.
9
do u among the Greeks to their custom of burning the
dead on the field of battle, to render them secure from
the revenge of the enemy.
Be that as it may, certain it is that incineration never
became the only mode by which the inhabitants of Hel-
las disposed of their deceased ; except in Athens, where
it was practiced exclusively for some time. Suicides,
those who had been struck by lightning, and unteethed
children were not cremated, for it was the prevailing
opinion that the pure flames would
have been defiled by them.
Homer, that incomparable Hellenic
poet (There is, I know, a dispute
whether the name Homer stands for
one person or for a number of bards.
As far as I am concerned, I believe
that Homer was an individual, a poor
mendicant perhaps, wandering all over
Greece, singing or reciting his heroic
epics, and living on the grace of an
admiring public. No collection of
bards could have possibly written the
Odyssey and Iliad, which are so uni- greek funeral i
form in character throughout.), has
preserved for us, in immortal verse, the records of the
Trojan war, in which we find many instances of cre-
mation chronicled. The recent explorations of Dr.
Heinrich Schliemann on the site of Troy have dem-
onstrated beyond a doubt that the poems of Homer
rest on a basis of actual fact.
During the war that was fought for Helen the beau-
tiful, it was customary among the Greeks and Trojans
to reduce to ashes the bodies of those who had been
10 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
slain in battle. Line 69 of the first book of the Iliad
proves that the Greeks burned their dead for sanitary
reasons.
The bodies of cowards, criminals, and slaves were
not incinerated, but left unburied, a prey for the beasts
of the field and the birds of the air. Agamemnon,
the king, addressing his warriors warns them (vide
Pope's translation of the Iliad, B. II, L. 466) that, dur-
ing battle : —
" Who dares, inglorious, in his ships to stay,
Who dares to tremble on this signal day,
That wretch, too mean to fall by martial power,
The birds shall mangle, and the dogs devour."
Incineration was denied Ajax, one of the greatest
Grecian heroes, because he had slain himself in a fit of
indignation. Hector's defiance of the Greek princes
(Iliad, B. VII, L. 85) shows that it was also the cus-
tom among the Trojans to burn the dead. There is
further evidence of this in the truce, between Priam
and Agamemnon (vide Iliad, B. VII, L. 398 and 450),
for the purpose of burning the dead of both armies.
Homer's narration of the burning of Patroclus, Achil-
les' friend, gives such an accurate description of the
method then in use, that I will be pardoned for quoting
it here. The passage to which I refer occurs in the
twenty-third book of the Iliad, and is as follows : —
" They who had the dead in charge
Remained, and heaped the wood and built a pyre
A hundred feet each way from side to side.
With sorrowful hearts they raised and laid the corpse
Upon the summit. Then they flayed and dressed
Before it many fatlings of the flock,
And oxen with curved feet and crooked horns.
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 11
From these magnanimous Achilles took
The fat, and covered with it carefully
The dead from head to foot. Beside the bier
And leaning toward it, jars of honey and oil
He placed, and flung, with many a deep-drawn sigh,
Twelve high-necked steeds upon the pile.
Nine hounds there were, which from the tables of the prince
Were daily fed ; of these Achilles struck
The heads from two, and laid them on the wood,
And after these, and last, twelve gallant sons
Of the brave Trojans, butchered by the sword;
For he was bent on evil. To the pile
He put the iron violence of fire,
And, wailing, called by name the friend he loved.
*********
. . . They quenched with dark red wine
The pyre, where'er the flames had spread, and where
Lay the deep ashes : then, with many tears,
Gathered the white bones of their gentle friend,
And laid them in a golden vase, wrapped round
With caul, a double fold. Within the tents
They placed them softly, wrapped in delicate lawn ;
Then drew a circle for the sepulchre,
And, laying its foundations to enclose
The pyre, they heaped the earth, and, having reared
A mound, withdrew."
These lines are from William Cullen Bryant's trans-
lation of the Iliad, and give one a very good idea of
the cineration of a warrior. In times of peace the
favorite animals of the deceased were placed with him
on the funeral pile, and he was covered with costly
robes and rugs. Not infrequently the pyre was deco-
rated with an abundance of flowers, and rich folks had
their trinkets and jewels thrown into the fire. The
weapons of warriors were consumed with them. The
extravagance at funerals finally became so great among
12 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the Greeks that special laws had to be enacted to put a
stop to it. Solon ordained, for instance, that no more
than three robes and one bull should be placed upon
the cremation pyre. After the bones were placed in
an urn, the Greeks covered it with the fat of the ani-
mals that had been slaughtered at the funeral ceremo-
nies, to protect it from the influence of the atmosphere.
Many of the celebrated men of Greece were cremated :
Solon, Alcibiades, Timoleon, Philopoemen, Plutarch,
Pyrrhus, and many others.
According to Pindar (01. 6, 23, Nem. 9, 54), during
the combat of the Seven against Thebes, funeral pyres
were burning at each of the seven gates of the city, to
consume those slain in battle. The heathens, as they
are called, were not to be charged with any lack of
respect to their departed dead. On the contrary, the
most tender sentiments conceivable were attached to
the practice of cremation. There was a Theban regu-
lation that no one should build a house without a
specific repository for the dead.
^Eneas and the other Trojans, who escaped with him
from the burning city of the hundred gates (as Priam's
capital was sometimes called), introduced cremation
(Virgil's ^Eneid, B. IV, 7) into Carthage, if it did not
exist there previous to their arrival. It is possible that
the inhabitants of Carthage, which was one of the Phoe-
nician cities in Africa, derived the practice from the
mother-country. At all events, the tragedy of love,
in which iEneas was involved, ended with the suicide
of Dido, who cremated herself.
The eleventh book of the iEneis gives a description
of an incineration among the ancient inhabitants of
Latium.
THE HISTOKY OF CREMATION. 13
Self-cremation seems to have been one of the favor-
ite means of disposing of one's self in ancient times,
especially among the royalty and aristocracy. Both
tradition and history report of many women, friends,
and servants who, of their own free will, mounted the
funeral pyre with the departed head of the family.
Besides Hercules and Dido, already mentioned, Sarda-
napalus, the last king of the Assyrians, burned himself
in the year 600 before Christ, because the Tigris had
destroyed the fortifications of besieged Nineveh, and
the following also mounted the pyre for the same pur-
pose : Marpessa, Polydora, and Cleopatra (Vide Pausa-
nias, 4, 2), three noble women of Messenia, and Euadne,
the wife of Capaneus, who threw herself into the flames
which consumed her husband. The pyre of Sardanapa-
lus, we are told, was very large and contained many
rooms, which were elegantly furnished, and in which
the royal treasures were heaped up, before the king
entered them with his women, while his servants set the
pile on fire. It is well known that the widows of India,
until very recently, perished of their own free will in
the flames that consumed their husbands.
Herodotus states that the women of the Thracians,
in Eastern Europe, who were probably of Germanic
origin, frequently disputed among themselves as to
which of them should be allowed to ascend the pyre
together with the deceased husband. (Enone, the law-
ful wife of Paris, whom he had forsaken to live with
Helen the beautiful, forgot all her grievances at the
sight of his misfortune. When the man, whom she
had formerly loved so ardently, wounded by the arrow
of Philoctetes, fled to her into the Ida, she refused to
cure him ; but when the greedy flames, after death,
14
CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
devoured his form, she voluntarily ascended the pyre
to intermix her ashes with his. Thus are the ways of
the world; the noble deed of the faithlessly deserted
wife is hardly ever mentioned, but frivolous Helena was
CREMATION IN CALCUTTA.
made the subject of many works of art, and leads an
immortal life in the songs and poems of man.
The ancient Etruscans practiced cremation, both be-
fore and after Etruria became a Roman province ; they,
no doubt, adopted it from the Greeks, who were first
their rulers and afterward their close neighbors. The
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 15
tombs of Etruria were rich in art; the urns in which
the ashes of the dead were kept were either of alabas-
ter or baked clay, the latter often being decorated with
tasty paintings.
The ancient Latins, in turn, borrowed the practice of
incineration from the Etruscans. According to Mazois,
some cinerary urns, found in the neighborhood of Alba
Longa, prove that the custom of burning the dead was
current among the original population of Latium long be-
fore any recorded epoch of Italian history, for the place
in which those urns were detected was covered entirely
over with dense layers of lava, which apparently came
from the mountain Albanus, a volcano, the eruptions
of which have long been buried in oblivion. The urns
mentioned are especially noteworthy, because many of
them bear pictures of the habitations of the earliest
residents of Latium, which shows that cremation was
known to them at that time. Such a hut of the abo-
rigines of Latium was preserved for a long time in the
capitol at Rome and was regarded with great rever-
ence. It is but natural that the Latins, on becoming
the founders of Rome, should have introduced inciner-
ation into their new home. Pliny asserts that the
burning of the dead was not customary among the
Romans of old, but Virgil describes it as a usage that
existed long before the foundation of Rome, and Ovid
affirms that the body of Remus was committed to the
flames.
Cremation was not in general favor among the
Romans until towards the termination of the republic.
Pliny relates that Sylla (78 B.C.) was the first of the
patrician Cornelians who wanted his body to be burned ;
most likely because he feared that his remains would be
16 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
dealt with as those of Marius had been treated, whose
body was exhumed by the order of Sylla, and thrown
into a glutted general grave. During the decline of the
republic and the period of the empire, till the accession
of the Christian emperors, incineration was very popular
in Rome; it was not only general in the capital, but
also in the provinces. Julius Caesar, Antonius, Brutus,
Pompejus, Octavius, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Nero,
and Plinius were cremated. The ashes of Tacitus, the
model of historians, who was likewise consigned to the
flames, were cast to the winds in the middle ages by
Pope Pius the Fifth, in order to punish the heretic.
Just think of it ! a pontiff outraging a scholar's remains
to punish him ! Caligula and Tiberius were only par-
tially burnt, because they had been tyrants.
At Nero's obsequies it was but with difficulty that
the train achieved complete cremation. The Roman
aristocracy looked upon partial cineration as a great dis-
grace, which adhered to the respective family a long
time. Yet this infamy was often meted out to the poor
and unfortunate, as we shall see later on.
During plagues cremation was compulsory in the city
of Rome.
It is not my intention to describe in detail the funeral
rites of the ancient Romans, because a description of
cremation as practiced by them may be met with in
every encyclopaedia. Moreover, a very good account of
incineration, as customary among the Romans of old,
may be found in Lord Bulwer Lytton's "The Last
Days of Pompeii."
It was the fashion at Rome to pour fragrant oils and
balsams over the corpse before the pyre was ignited,
and to cover it with Cyprus boughs. Previous to crema-
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 17
tion, the corpse was enveloped in asbestos, to keep the
ashes of the body separate from those of the funeral
pile. At times locks of hair were sacrificed to the de-
ceased. At last one finger of the defunct was ampu-
tated, to make certain that death had taken place.
Everything being ready, the nearest relative present
unclosed the eyes of the deceased, and then lit the pyre
with averted face. While the flames rose to heaven,
the favorite animals of him who was now being con-
sumed— dogs, doves, and even horses — were flung into
the fire. Costly robes and arms of the dead were con-
signed to the same fate. During the early period of
Roman history, prisoners of war were also committed to
the flames.
The amount of spices, oils, and balsams destroyed at
incinerations was enormous. Pliny reports that Nero
used up more myrrh, incense, and other aromatics at
the cremation of Poppsea than could be produced by
entire Arabia in one year.
While cremation was practiced in Rome, at the time
of the empire, the mourning garments were white ; but
when incineration was displaced by interment, the rai-
ment of the bereaved assumed a black hue, sombre as
death itself.
The deceased poor of Rome (especially the women
and slaves) were treated shamefully after death. Mar-
tial avers that invariably one pile had to serve for a
large number. In times of pestilence, thousands were
so disposed of. A cremation-ground was provided for
the indigent in a wretched suburb upon the Esquiline
Hill, which was inhabited by the outcasts of society, the
lowest prostitutes, executioners, necromancers, and so
forth. These localities were called culince by the peo-
18 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
pie, the literal translation of which is "roast-places."
The attendants were police-slaves, whose hair had been
shaved off, and who wore a brand on the bare pate.
These, hurrying to and fro, placed the emaciated dead
poor upon one of the many funeral piles ; hardly singed
by the fire, they were taken from it and thrown into a
universal ditch. To every ten male corpses one female
body was added, which facilitated the cineration by
means of the great quantity of adipose tissue which it
contained. The funerals of the poor were generally
held at night.
The urns of the rich were of marble, bronze, and
sometimes of gold or silver ; those of the poor were of
baked clay or glass. Glass urns, enclosed in others of
lead, were discovered at Pompeii. The urns were gen-
erally deposited in a tomb at the roadside or placed in
the pigeon-hole of a columbarium.
These columbaria, surrounded by beautiful gardens,
were situated on the Via Appia, Aurelia, Flaminia, and
Lavicana. The Appian Way was a favorite resort of
the fashionable Roman world; here, daily, ever-chang-
ing life was seen ; here the traveller took leave from the
remains of his ancestors ; here, too, lovers met and
unfortunates took refuge.
These columbaria were subterranean chambers which
served (as I have already explained) to hold the ashes
of the deceased, the urns being deposited in arched re-
cesses, hewn out in the rock for the purpose. These
niches resembled pigeon-holes; hence the name, colum-
barium. The rare beauty of these columbaria, which
may yet be seen in the Eternal City, led Nathaniel
Hawthorne, our great romancer, to exclaim that he
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 19
would not object to being decently pigeon-holed in a
Roman tomb.
CREMATION IN SIAM.
The late queen and her little daughter on the pyre.
Campana discovered columbaria between the Porta
Latina and the Porta San Sebastiana, which are memo-
20 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
rials of the time of Augustus. They contain not less
than 400 inscriptions on marble, commemorative of the
dead, and many urns of marble and terra cotta.
In the city of the Caesars the ashes were placed in
upright urns, while in Greece the urns lay horizontally
on the ground, and were covered with rugs. In Greece
the ashes were preserved in beautiful mortuary cham-
bers in the houses, a custom that also obtained at Rome
to a certain extent.
The great contrast between the cremation of the opu-
lent and the poor finally led to the re-introduction of
earth-burial, which, however, strangely enough, was
coincident with the decline and fall of the once mighty
empire.
The last Roman funeral piles expired in the fourth
century, while the Indo-Germanic nations practiced cre-
mation till late in mediaeval times.
The Germanic tribes and the Celts (according to
Tacitus and Diodorus of Sicily) burned their dead with-
out exception. The testimony of these historians is
confirmed by Ovicl (Met., Lib. Ill, v. 619-620), who
adds that cremation was highly esteemed by these
peoples.
Tacitus (vide Germania, Lib. 37), writing one hun-
dred years before Christ, relates that the ancient Ger-
mans preferred a plain funeral to funereal pomp. Only
the bodies of celebrated men were cinerated with some
ostentation on pyres built of certain costly kinds of
wood. They neither ornamented their funeral piles,
nor did they use spices at cremations. The arms of
every warrior, however, and sometimes the battle-horse,
were burnt with him. An unadorned mound was
raised over the ashes, and nothing was left to mark the
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 21
spot where one of their kin had been laid to rest.
Criminals were not cremated, but pat to death in vari-
ous ways; traitors and deserters were hanged to con-
venient trees, and cowards drowned in swamps.
The Thuringians burned their dead as late as the
seventh century; the Anglo-Saxons down to the end of
the eighth century. The Swabians, Franks, Lombards,
Ostrogoths, Alemanni, and Burgundians disposed of
their deceased by fire till 740 A.D. Winfrid, or Bon-
iface, the so-called apostle of the Germans, in a letter
refers to the custom of fire-burial among the Saxons.
Charlemange, who brought about the conversion of
the Saxons by fire and sword, made a special enact-
ment against incineration. The custom of crema-
tion was so deep-rooted among the Saxons, that the
death-penalty had to be set upon its consummation in
order to cause its abolishment.
The ancient Lithuanians and the forefathers of the
present Prussians were wont to consign their dead to
the flames. When the ancient Prussians were defeated
by the knights of the Teutonic order in the year of our
Lord 1249, their vanquishers caused them to promise in
writing that they would henceforth, after cremating
their deceased with horse, armor, and weapons, collect
the remains and bury them within the churchyard,
according to Christian usage. There is evidence to
show that cineration of the dead was extant in Western
Prussia until after 1300 A.D.
Cinerary urns, containing ashes, were discovered near
Dantzig, Prussia, and in Silesia.
In the course of forming a vineyard in the neighbor-
hood of Wasserbillig, near Trier, numerous graves were
laid bare, in some of which urns were found with the
22 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
remains of cremated bodies ; in others, skeletons. In
the former case the cinerary urns (vide Sanitary
Record) were surrounded by chalkstone slabs; one of
the skeletons was contained in a sarcophagus composed
of fourteen roof-tiles. Nine of them had the stamps of
the manufacturer, the same names being given as those
of the manufacturers who furnished material for the
erection of the Roman church which forms the basis of
the cathedral of Trier, and for the Roman thermal baths
at St. Barbara. Judging from these circumstances, it
is assumed that the tombs date from the middle of the
third century. In one of the graves a small urn with
the representation of a face was found.
In Trier itself, a large glass urn, with cover and
handles, was recently unearthed. It is a relic of the
Romans. When opened it was found to contain bones.
Beside this urn five vases of baked clay and several
ornamented lamps were found.
The ancient Swiss were in the habit of cremating
their defunct, till the year 56 before Christ.
Julius Caesar reports that the Gauls burned their
dead with sumptuousness.
Several ancient glass urns, containing calcined bones,
were recently found between two round stones, in the
vicinity of Chatenet, France.
The Slavonians observed incineration from the earliest
times to the end of the fifteenth century. When one
of their kings died, everything he might need on awak-
ening in paradise was placed with him on the pyre.
Beside intoxicating drinks, weapons, horses, falcons,
male and female servants, and his wives, his entire
household — comprising the minister of state, secretary,
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 23
mate at drinking, and physician — was cremated with
him.
The Slavonian woman was invariably burned with
the corpse of her husband ; but not vice versa, the hus-
band with the remains of his wife. When a bachelor
died, single women were substituted for spouses. The
chronicles that have descended to us from the monks
affirm that these women longed for such a death,
because they hoped to secure eternal blessedness
thereby.
Large mounds, called Kurgani, were erected over the
ashes of the cremated. These mounds may be seen
to-day in the boundless steppes of Russia, where they
afford a rest for the eyes from the monotonous scenery.
Eckehardt relates that, when Germany was invaded
by the Hungarians in 925 A.D., he witnessed the intrud-
ers cremate the bodies of the slain upon rack-wagons.
The Bohemians practiced cremation as late as 1000
A.D.
The Arab Ibn Forszlan, who was ambassador from
his native land to the Russians in the year of our Lord
922, states that he attended the cineration of a man of
rank, on the banks of the Volga River. Previous to the
cremation the deceased was interred, till the robes of
state requisite for the ceremony were finished. Then
the ship of the dead was drawn ashore, the defunct
owner placed upon a bench, which had been covered
with gorgeous rugs, and supplied with food, intoxicat-
ing beverages, and a number of slaughtered animals.
Thereupon a young girl, who had voluntarily offered
herself for incremation (probably to be the companion
of the deceased in the other world), was led aboard and
— after singing a long chant to the people and drinking
24 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
a goblet of mead — strangled and stabbed at the same
time. Then the ship was deserted, and set afire by the
nearest relative, who performed this sad office with
averted face. Thereupon every one present threw a
burning piece of wood upon the vessel, which was soon
consumed. A mound was erected on the site on which
the ship had stood, in the centre of which a plank was
placed, bearing the name of the departed.
Old German chroniclers mention the cremation of
Attila, the king of the Tartar Huns, who was burned
while sitting — fully armed — upon his war-horse. It
is still an undecided question whether incineration was
general among the Huns, or only a royal honor.
The Scythians and Sarmatians of old reduced their
dead to ashes, as also did the Kurds, till 1205 a.d. ; and
the Esthonians till 1225.
Cremation was likewise practiced by the ancient
Scandinavians, — more especially by the Norwegians
and Swedes than by the Danes. The national Scandi-
navian epic, the Edda, mentions the funeral piles of
Sigurdh and Brynhilde.
The ancient Britons disposed of their dead by fire.
Some workmen engaged in excavations in the bail
within the boundaries of the old Roman city at Lincoln
lately came across a crematorium and a sarcophagus.
In the latter ten urns were found, which contained
ashes and calcined bones. The urns were of different
sizes and shapes, and were all provided with saucer-
shaped covers. Only one of them, however, was
extracted perfect. The interior of the sarcophagus was
lined with long, thin bricks, that perished on being
exposed to the air.
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 25
The Mexicans of antiquity also cinerated their de-
ceased.
Incineration was practiced in India since the most
remote ages, and is now as much in vogue in this coun-
try as it was in the earliest times. At Calcutta, Bom-
bay, Madras, — in fact, all over India, — cremation is
executed daily.
The Vishnavites burn their dead; the worshippers of
Siva bury them, deliver them up to beasts of prey, or
throw them into the holy river Ganges. Folks who are
too poor to dispose of their deceased by burning, also
consign them to the waves of the holy stream. This is
done at night, since it is against the law. It is not
unusual to see a whole procession of corpses float down
the Ganges, while crows feed on the remains.
At Calcutta, cremation is performed within the
" Burning Ghat," outside the city, in a walled en-
closure which is frequented by numberless vultures
and other birds of prey, near the Hoogly, as the Ganges
is thereabouts called. This place is seldom visited by
the British inhabitants of Calcutta; for they regard
this rude cineration (properly so) far too horrible to
witness.
By order of the government, a cmerator Avas built on
the banks of the Hoogly, which is used only by a part
of the Hindoo population. The Hindoos are hard to
wean from their old-fashioned method of cineration
(which is substantially the same as that practiced by
the ancient Romans and Greeks), and, therefore, sel-
dom make use of a cinerator, as Mr. William Eassie
was informed by the sanitary commissioner of Madras,
where a cinerary apparatus had also been erected. The *
commissioner, however, was of the opinion that if the
26
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 27
Siemens principle of a furnace were exhibited before
the educated Hindoos, they would very probably adopt
it.
Thanks to the efforts of the British authorities in
India, imperfect cremation is a thing of the past there.
Cicero already relates that the widows of the Hindoos
allow themselves to be cinerated with the remains of
their husbands. Self-cremation of Indian widows does
not occur nowadays ; the barbaric custom has been put
down by the English.
It was not before 1831 that the English government
in Hindostan attempted to abolish the practice of
burning widows ; and up to that time, as Max Mueller
observes, " women were burned wholesale, even in the
immediate neighborhood of Calcutta." But the custom
was jDrobably not exterminated before late in the sixties
— 1868 or 69.
Cremation was practiced on the isle of Ceylon as late
as 1841.
The people of Burmah cremate their rich dead, and
inhume the poor or consign them to a stream. Persons
of rank are embalmed before incineration, and placed
on exhibition in a convent or temple for six weeks. At
the funeral, the body is borne in a coffin on the shoul-
ders of men, who are preceded by female mourners
chanting an epicede. The corpse is followed by the
relatives. When the slowly moving train arrives at
the pyre, which is commonly six or eight feet high,
the remains are placed upon it ; the wood of the funeral
pile is generally laid crosswise, to bring about a stronger
draught of air. The pyre is set on fire by the attend-
ing priests, who pray before it until the body is de-
stroyed; then the bones are collected and interred.
28 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
According to Mr. W. Eassie, when a Buddhist priest
of rank dies in Bnrmah, the body is embalmed in honey,
laid in state for a time, and then sometimes blown up
with gunpowder, together with its hearse.
Miss Feudge asserts that the inhabitants of Pegu and
Laos also cremate their dead.
In Siam, cremation has undoubtedly existed since
primeval times. It is a universal custom, practiced
both by the common people and the aristocracy ; even
the kings are incinerated. Crawfurd states that in
Siam the ashes are sometimes interred in the grounds
surrounding the temples, and a small pyramidal mound
erected over them.
When one of the Dayakkese inhabitants of Borneo
dies, the body is deposited in a coffin, and remains in
the house till the son, the father, or the nearest of kin
can procure or purchase a slave, who is beheaded at the
time that the corpse is burned, in order that he may
become the servant of the deceased in the next world.
The ashes of the departed are then placed in an earthen
urn, which is adorned with various figures ; and the
head of the slave is desiccated, and prepared in a
peculiar manner with camphor and drugs, and placed
near it. It is said that this practice induces the Da}^ak-
kese to buy a slave guilty of some capital crime, at five-
fold his value, in order that they may be able to put
him to death on such occasions.
Cremation is an established and time-honored usage
in Japan, now the oldest empire in the world. Here
all incineration establishments are under government
control, and are to be found not only in all the chief
cities, but also in the provinces. The Japanese govern-
ment, with shrewd appreciation of the advantages of
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 29
sanitary laws, has of late years carefully fostered the
practice. Since the earliest times, cremation is univer-
sal among the Japanese.
Before the introduction of Buddhism, the Shinto
doctrine was the prevalent system of faith and worship
in Japan. This religion held sacred, beside a small
number of domestic gods, a long series of celebrated
historical personages, who were worshipped after their
decease. It taught that the mikado (emperor) de-
scended from the gods, and he was its clerical superior.
This doctrine, of course, was not favorable to crema-
tion; and that accounts for the absence of the latter
prior to the introduction of Buddhism. Beginning
with the year of our Lord 552, attempts were made,
with varying success, to establish Buddhism in Japan.
In 624, Buddhism was officially recognized ; the court
bestowing the title of high-priest upon two priests who
had come from Hakusai. The new doctrine spread
through the medium of the Chinese literature that cir-
culated in the country ; and soon temples had to be
built to accommodate the converts.
In 700 a.d., D6sho, a high-priest of a temple at Nara,
in the province Yamato, ordered his pupils to burn his
body after death, and it was done. This was the first
cremation in Japan.
Three years later, the corpse of the empress Jito was
incinerated ; her example was followed by 41 emper-
ors and empresses, who occupied the throne from that
period till the beginning of the seventeenth century.
The last mikado whose body was burned, was Goyozei,
who reigned from 1587 till 1610 a.d. At this time
much attention was paid to the doctrines of Confucius,
30 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
which are as unfavorable to cineration as the Shinto
doctrine.
In the ninth century Buddhism made considerable
headway through the efforts of Kobo, a priest. Up to
the fourteenth century, however, Buddhism remained
the religion of the military and the aristocracy ; the
common people knew nothing of it. It owes its adop-
tion among all classes of Japan, to the arduous labors
of two missionaries, Shinran and Nichiren, who became
the founders of great sects, and who had their corpses
burned as an example for their pupils.
Cremation is fast becoming general in Japan, burial
more and more obsolete. At the present time the num-
ber of bodies disposed of by incineration is very great.
The greatest number of believers in cremation are
found among the Shin and Yoto sects, likewise among
the Zen, Tendai, and Nichiren sects ; the fewest, among
the Shingon sect. Incineration is, however, not com-
pulsory among these religious denominations. In 1868,
when the shogun (commander-in-chief) was deposed by
the revolutionists, when the mikado re-obtained his
former authority and the power of the almost independ-
ent princes of the provinces was destroj^ed, the govern-
ment attempted to re-establish the Shinto religion.
Among other measures they prohibited incineration
(July 23, 1873), claiming that it was contrary to the
Shinto doctrine.
They soon discovered that it was impossible to carry
out the interdiction, and, therefore, revoked it (May 23,
1875), granting thereby, as it were, religious freedom
to Japan.
The young generation of the Japanese physicians and
naturalists regard cineration from a sanitary standpoint,
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION.
31
and constantly urge the government to promote its
interests on hygienic grounds.
It must be conceded that the Japanese mode of cre-
mation is by far superior to the method of the Hindoos,
32 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
who still adhere to the ancient funeral-pile. The cost
of incineration is small. The body is reduced to ashes
completely though slowly, and the process takes place
in clean, well-kept, closed buildings, in a manner
which, as far as the simple arrangements permit,
offends neither the eye nor the olfactories.
At Osaka cremation is carried on in stone furnaces,
which are closed by iron sliding-doors. There are
three large crematories, situated at the outskirts of the
city ; they are enclosed by high walls, and when seen
from a distance, if it were not for the chimneys 60 feet
high, one would take them to be temples. The princi-
pal crematory contains twenty large furnaces, each of
which is capable of reducing three bodies; thus it is
evident 60 bodies can be incinerated at the same time.
The corpse is placed upon an iron grate, the fire being
underneath, and covered with a straw mat, that has
been previously saturated with salt water. Incinera-
tion under these circumstances is said to be entirely
satisfactory. The cremations begin at 11 p.m., and
are finished at 3 A.M.
At Tokio, and most of the other cities, a black
earthenware urn is fashionable ; but in the province
Totomi the ashes are placed in an urn of red color.
When the Asiatic cholera raged in Japan in 1877, the
people were compelled by the authorities to cremate
its victims. But the sanitary measure met with no
resistance, its wisdom being recognized even by the
lower classes of the people. By the decree, making
cremation obligatory in times of cholera, the Japanese
government has given an example of sanitary legisla-
tion which should be imitated.
Most of the books on cremation inform us that incin-
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 66
eration was and is not practiqed in China. This is an
error. Marco Polo repeatedly asserts (Travels. New
York: Harper & Bros., 1845. pp. 153, 155, 158, 159,
160) that the Chinese wherever he travelled were in
the habit of burning their dead.
On the other hand, Chinese historical works make no
mention of the practice, and burial is the almost univer-
sal custom at present. The books in which the subject
of cremation is treated only speak of it as being prac-
ticed upon the bodies of Buddhist priests and lepers.
In the last issue of the Chinese imperial maritime
customs medical reports, Dr. A. Henry contributes some
remarks upon cremation in that country. In only one
of the many Buddhist temples at the town where Dr.
Henry is stationed, are the bodies of the inmates
burned after death. The method of incineration is
commendable as efficient, aesthetic, and inexpensive ;
but it is too slow except for Buddhist priests in China.
In the grounds of the temple is a small dome-like
edifice, the interior of which communicates with the
open air by a small door only — a charcoal kiln, in fact.
The dead priest is placed in a sitting posture inside the
dome, and charcoal and firewood are piled around him ;
fire is applied, and the door is shut until combustion is
complete. Children are sometimes burned, but for
superstitious reasons only. When several young chil-
dren of a family have died in succession, the body of
one of them is burned, under the belief that the cer-
emony will insure the survival of the next child born
to the family. In these cases the body is simply
brought to an open field in a box, and placed upon fire-
wood, which is ignited.
Although incineration is known in Corea, the most
34 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
«
usual way of disposing of the dead is by inhumation.
Mr. Carles, in an official report of a journey into the
central provinces of Corea, says : —
"At one village the remains of the body of an old
woman who had been eateu by a tiger, were being burnt
in a fire of brushwood lighted on the spot."
Cremation in America is not a novelty. When I
began to investigate the subject of cremation among
North American Indians, I was at first quite disap-
pointed; and well I might have been, for Schoolcraft
(History of the Indian Tribes of the United States.
Vol. I, p. 38) asserts : —
" The incineration of the bodies of the dead was not
practiced on this continent, even in the tropics ; and is a
rite unknown to the tribes of the United States."
Although slightly disheartened, I continued my search
for information, and was in consequence speedily re-
warded. John Mcintosh (The Origin of the North
American Indians. New York, 1853. p. 164) states : —
" The bodies of those who die in war are burned, and
their ashes brought back to be laid in the burying-place
of their fathers."
My studies in this direction, however, received the
greatest impetus through Dr. H. C. Yarrow's excellent
"Introduction to the Study of Mortuary Customs among
the North American Indians " (Washington Govern-
ment Printing Office, 1880, pp. 49 to 59), which was
kindly sent to me by the author, and from which I
obtained much valuable information.
Dr. H. C. Yarrow affirms that cremation was per-
formed to a considerable extent among North American
Indians, especially those living on the northern slope of
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 35
the Rocky Mountains ; but also (as indisputable evi-
dence proves) among the more eastern ones.
The Nishinams of California, the Tolkotins of Ore-
gon, the Se-ne'l of California, and the Cocopa tribe on
the Colorado River, practice cremation.
The Unotello Indians of Oregon also cinerate their
dead. On Oct. 9, 1884, several of them got drunk at
Lastine, Ore., and engaged in a bloody fight. One was
cut to death, and two others badly slashed. The In-
dians burned the body of their dead comrade, and held
a war-dance while the body was slowly consumed.
Mr. George Gibbs avers that the Indians of Clear
Lake, Cal., burn their dead upon scaffolds built over
a hole, into which the ashes are thrown and covered.
The Digger Indians have a queer custom ; they mix
the ashes of the dead with gum, and smear them on the
heads of the mourners.
The Comanches also burn their dead.
The Indian method of cremation is like that of the
ancients; the corpse is burnt on a pyre six feet high,
amidst exclamations of grief and sorrow, funeral songs
and dances.
Incineration is current among some of the native
tribes of Alaska, principally among the Thlinkets.
In the summer of 1884, I received a letter from a
former fellow-student of mine, — Dr. Hugh S. Wyman,
— who was then assistant surgeon in the United States
Marine Hospital Service, and stationed at Sitka, Alaska.
This missive contained the following : —
" The Thlinket Indians cremate their dead in every
instance except one — that of the Indian doctor, whose
body is never burned, but placed in a sort of s cache,'
constructed of timber, above ground. Carvings of
36
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
images, etc., representing the family history, are made
on the grave, or a tall pole is erected by the side, with
INDIAN CINERARY URN.
Found in Kentucky.
INDIAN CINERARY URN.
Found in Indiana.
a red flag. With the body of the doctor are placed all
his personal effects. These are supposed to remain
undisturbed; but the empty appearance of the caches
and the skulless skeletons of the few graves I have
visited, with a curiosity to look inside, have led me
to believe that the effects and body do not always lie
unmolested.
INDIAN CINERARY URN.
Found in Georgia.
INDIAN CINERARY URN.
Found at Lake Nicaragua.
" The cremation of a Thlinket takes place in open
air. The body, after lying in state for a few days, is
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 37
taken out of the house through some opening made for
the purpose, never through the regular entrance. It is
placed on a pile of logs, which are ignited, and the
corpse rolled about with long poles until thoroughly
consumed.
" The ceremonies attending cremation vary very
much, according to the standing of the deceased, age,
sex, and so on.
" The only reason I have ever heard given by the
Indians why they cremate was that if not burned, the
body would always remain cold in the happy hunting-
grounds.
"I was unable to find out why they do not burn
doctors.
"I believe cremation among the civilized will neces-
sarily become generally practiced in the future, and
without ideas of horror, when people are more fully
enlightened, especially in hygienic principles."
In recent times, the missionaries are trying to put a
stop to cremation in Alaska. This is a great mistake ;
and they will find it out before long. The missiona-
ries should endeavor to do what the English in India
have done and are doing still — attempt to substitute
scientific incineration for the crude ancient method of
burning the dead on pyres. And in this undertaking,
I am sure, they would have the support of the most
intelligent among the Indians. The natives of Alaska,
no doubt, learned by some terrible, never-to-be-for-
gotten experience the dangers and evils of burial in
the ground; and, although their method of obviating
these dangers and evils is rude and barbaric, the
principle which impelled them to adopt cremation is
right.
38 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
The first Caucasian who was cremated in the United
States was Colonel Henry Laurens, who was the presi-
dent of the first Congress, which convened at Philadel-
phia in 1774; he was also a member of the military
family of General Washington. Laurens was of Hugue-
not descent, born in Charleston, S. C, in 1724, and emi-
nent as a statesman before and during the Revolutionary
War. He was educated in one of the best universities
of Europe, and although following the vocation of a
merchant during many years, he achieved great distinc-
tion as a writer on political topics; his pamphlets on
the public questions of the time received much consid-
eration. Appointed minister to Holland, he was taken
captive on the voyage thither by a British man-of-war,
and was imprisoned for some time in the Tower as a
rebel. Among his visitors there was a friend of other
years, Edmund Burke, by whose influence he was finally
set free. One of Laurens' daughters had, when a child,
apparently died of small-pox, but, being placed near an
open window, she revived. Since this occurrence, the
colonel lived in constant fear of being buried alive, and
therefore requested his daughters, by an injunction and
detailed directions given in his will, to burn his body
after death; his fervent wish was carried out in his
garden at Charleston, S. C, in 1792.
The second to be burned was Mr. Henry Barry,
who lived and was cinerated in the vicinity of Marion,
S.C.
In the spring or winter of 1855, Count Pfeil, a Ger-
man aristocrat, then proprietor of a farm in the neigh-
borhood of Milwaukee, attempted to incinerate the
corpse of his wife in accordance with her own request.
He accordingly erected a funeral pile in his own yard,
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 39
on the soil that he owned. 'When his intention to burn
his wife became known among the farmers in the vicin-
ity, there was a great uproar ; they finally went so far
as to march in a body to the residence of the count,
and to declare that they would mob him if he would
dare to execute the cremation. He then proposed,
since the matter was creating a disturbance in the
neighborhood, to transfer the incineration to the lake
shore. But the prejudice of the farmers was so great
that they would accept no compromise. They finally
petitioned the governor, and were successful in ob-
taining a decree prohibiting the cremation. The
count, disgusted at the lack of our boasted liberty,
interred his wife, sold his estate, and departed for
Europe.
The third reduced to ashes in the United States was
the Baron de Palm, prince of the Holy Roman Empire,
a native of Augsburg, Bavaria, who was incinerated in
the Le Moyne crematory at Washington1, Pa., on the
6th of December, 1876. The baron had died at the
age of sixty-seven at New York, in May, 1875, and his
body had been immediately embalmed and placed in
the receiving vault of the Lutheran cemetery, where
it was kept until the Le Moyne crematorium was
finished.
On this day mentioned, many members of the secular
press, and delegations from various scientific and sani-
tary societies, assembled at the crematory to witness
the cineration of the defunct nobleman; many of the
leading newspapers of this country, and also of France,
Germany, and England, were represented. About 30
invitations had been issued, and many members of the
prominent boards of health were present. The fires
40 CREMATION OF THE BEAD.
had been started at two o'clock in the morning. On
opening the casket it was found that the weight of the
bod}' had been reduced from 175 to 92 pounds. At 27
minutes past eight o'clock, everything being pronounced
ready, the body, lying in the iron cradle and covered
with a shroud (which had previously been soaked in an
alum solution, to prevent its too rapid ignition), and
decorated with flowers and evergreen, was consigned to
the retort, which was instantly shut. The actual tem-
perature of the retort could not be ascertained, as no
pyrometer was at hand; it was, no doubt, a little over
2000° Fahrenheit. Through a small opening in the
cast-iron door, which closed the retort, an occasional
glimpse of the interior was obtained, and the effect of
the heat upon the body observed. In about 15 minutes
the aqueous vapor had all been expelled, leaving the
shroud completely charred, but still retaining its form
sufficiently to completely conceal the outlines of the
body. In an hour the outlines of the prominent bones
were plainly visible, and an hour later the incineration
was complete, but it was deemed advisable to continue
the heat for four hours from the time the body had
been first placed in the furnace. When last seen, much
of the form of the body had remained, owing to the
exclusion of the atmospheric air. During the burning,
the ordinary draft of the furnace was increased by
means of a fan-blower. The body was not removed
from the furnace until some 24 hours had elapsed, to
allow the retort to cool. During the entire process
there was no offensive odor, either at the top of the
chimney or elsewhere. The cremation was entirely
satisfactory, and nothing of an unpleasant nature oc-
curred. The residue left, after the incineration was
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION.
41
completed, was three pints of ashes, which were care-
fully collected, and, after being sprinkled with perfume,
were deposited in an antique vase, which was delivered
to the officers of the Theosophical Society in attend-
ance, of which the baron was a member.
CREMATORY AT WASHINGTON, PA.
Forty bushels of coke were consumed in burning
Baron Palm, the whole cost of the operation being
•7.04.
In the afternoon a meeting was held at Washington,
presided over by J. Lawson Judson, Esq., at which ad-
dresses were made by Colonel Olcott on the history of
cremation ; Rev. George P. Hayes (president of the
42 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Washington and Jefferson College) on the bearing of
the Bible and Christianity upon the subject of crema-
tion; Dr. James King on. incineration from a sanitary
point of view; Dr. Le Moyne on the general advan-
tages of cremation ; Boyd Crumine, Esq., who spoke of
the popular prejudices against this method of dispos-
ing of the dead; and Mr. Nicholas K. Wade, who
alluded to the mechanical necessities of a perfect
cremation.
It is to be regretted that so many of the persons who
attended this incineration had a preconceived notion of
the practice, which rendered them totally unfit to judge
of it. Being prejudiced from the beginning, it is not at
all surprising that they should have given unsatisfac-
tory, highly sensational, and misrepresenting accounts
of the affair to the world ; but as Mr. W. Eassie perti-
nently remarks, the same thing has occurred in every
case of modern cremation up to the present time, and
will, no doubt, continue until the reform is more com-
monly practiced.
The fourth body that was cremated in the United
States was Mrs. Jane Pitman, from Cincinnati, who
was destroyed in the Le Moyne crematorium, Feb. 6,
1877. The fifth disposed of bj fire in America was
Dr. Winslow, of California, who was burned at Salt
Lake City on the 31st of July, 1877, in a primitive
furnace temporarily erected through his request by the
administrators of his estate. The sixth was a child of
Mr. Julius Kircher, who cremated it in his oven at New
York City, in the fall of 1877.
The Le Moyne crematory was closed to the general
public Aug. 1, 1884. After that date no bodies were
received by the trustees of the crematorium, outside of
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 43
Washington County, for cremation. Bodies were ad-
mitted to the Le Moyne furnace for incineration from
all parts of the country, only in order to carry out Dr.
Le Moyne's view of reform — keeping the subject be-
fore the public. Since the interest manifested by the
people of the United States in the subject of cremation
is speedily growing, other crematories are building
where the public will be accommodated ; and as the busi-
ness increased to such an extent that it occupied more
time than the trustees could possibly devote to it, they
were compelled to limit the use of the crematory.
Hereafter, therefore, no body will be cremated in this
furnace, who has not lived within the county in which
Dr. Le Moyne lived and died. And whereas not one of
the persons consumed in this crematorium (except the
owner himself) hailed from Washington County, we
may presume that this pioneer furnace of cremation in
America has been closed forever.
Of all the cremations which took place in the Le
Moyne furnace, that of Professor S. D. Gross, M.D.,
LL.D., attracted the greatest attention. It was in
accordance with his expressed wish that he was com-
mitted to the flames. He more than once declared he
had no desire that some " curious impertinent " should,
a hundred years hence, hand around his jawbone for
inspection and comment, and to avoid such a contin-
gency he gave positive directions for the burning of his
body. Cremation as a mode of decently disposing of
the dead could receive approval from no higher source,
and in no more conspicuous manner, than in the dispo-
sition of his remains by that means. Dr. Gross stood
without a peer among his fellows ; he was venerated
not only by the medical profession of America, but
44 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
even by physicians of foreign lands. He was to the
profession of medicine what Charles O'Connor was to
the profession of law, and his deliberate choice of in-
cineration in preference to burial attracted wide and
respectful attention even in so conservative a class as
doctors. Perhaps no man ever drew breath who was
better qualified to express an opinion on this subject.
Who is so well entitled to form a correct opinion as
the man who for nearly three-quarters of a century had
the closest possible relations with the dying and the
dead ? That his example gave a new impetus to incin-
eration there is no room to doubt. He sought to be a
teacher even after his death; he wanted to benefit his
race even in his decease. Perhaps he believed that
others might follow where he led, as they had done in
life. Others will follow his example, and the work go
on until the present custom shall give way to the better
one. It may be long before that time comes, but come
it will.
On its way to Washington, Pa., the body was accom-
panied by Mr. A. H. Gross and Dr. Horwitz. There
were no ceremonies at the incineration, and the remains
were reduced to ashes in two hours. The ashes
weighed about seven pounds, were hermetically sealed
in a tin box, and placed in the coffin in which the body
was carried to Washington. On reaching Philadelphia
the coffin was removed to the late residence of Dr. Gross,
and subsequently the ashes were enclosed in a marble
urn about three feet high, unornamented and without
inscription, and placed beside the coffin of Dr. Gross'
late wife in the family vault at Woodlawn Cemetery,
where the Rev. Dr. Charles Currie read the Episcopal
burial service.
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 45
Voltaire derided his contemporaries by declaring that
they could not protect themselves from the fatal power
of the dead. But when the great Revolution came along,
overthrowing the then existing order of things, and
performing a painful but necessary work, the same
France that had listened to the voice of the great
philosopher became aware of a means that shielded
from the dangers of the burial-ground — cremation.
On the 28th of March, 1794 (28 Germinal, An II),
the deceased republican Beauvais, physician at Mont-
pellier and member of the National Assembly, was cre-
mated in the Champ-de-Mars at Paris. The urn con-
taining his ashes was deposited in the archives of the
nation.
In the year V of the republic (1797), a motion by
Daubermesnil, to introduce facultative incineration, pro-
viding that the act would take place outside of Paris,
was rejected by the Council of the Five Hundred; but in
1799 (year VII of the republic), a law was passed by
the Seine department in favor of cremation. Advan-
tage was frequently taken of the permission granted.
At this time the Institute of France offered a prize of
1500 francs for the best essay on the question whether
interment or cineration is preferable. In consequence,
40 dissertations were sent in, and all of them de-
manded optional cremation. The prize was accorded
to two essays: those of MM. Mulot and Amaury-
Duval.
From 1856 to 1867, the French cremationists were led
by M. Bonneau and Dr. CafTe ; the latter has retained
the leadership till the most recent times, and has done
much, by his admirable expositions of the subject, to
popularize cremation in France. One point was brought
46 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
out by him that is deserving of mention here, namely,
that one tempted to stray from the path of honor and
virtue may be restrained by the presence of ancestral
urns.
Dr. Prosper de Pietra-Santa is to-day the foremost
incinerationist in France, a position to which he does
honor and which he well merits. His essays, first pub-
lished in £' Union Medicale, are the chief contribu-
tions to modern French cremation literature. In 1873,
he issued a complete "manual of the subject, in which he
deplored the absence of popular sympathy with inciner-
ation in France. But the time will come when France
will recognize the value of the labors of this ardent
reformer, whose name is destined to occupy a most
prominent place on the roll of honor of his native
country.
The cremation society of France, the proper designa-
tion of which is " La Societe pour la propagation de la
cremation," was founded in 1880, and incorporated on
the 23d of December of the same year. The late Ed-
niond About and Leon Gambetta — L'illustre citoyen
que la France a perdu — were members of this associa-
tion. At present the society numbers 570 members.
Its principal object now is to obtain a law permitting
cremation ; when this is secured, it will devote its funds
to the erection of crematories and the purchase of inven-
tions which tend to simplify the process.
According to Professor R. Beverly Cole, M.D., for
many years past cremation is not infrequently practiced
in Paris, the retorts of the gas factories being employed
for the purpose.
The first and only incineration in Belgium took place
in 1798 or 1799, when a certain M. Voidel, a resident
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 47
of Mons, cremated the body of his child in the yard of
his house, and preserved the ashes in a golden urn.
The cremation society of Brussels was founded on
the 28th of February, 1882, and numbers now over 600
members.
The cremation society of Holland, which boasts a
very complete organization, extends over the entire
kingdom by means of branch societies. It was founded
on the 28th of December, 1874, and incorporated by
the royal decree of Sept. 1, 1875. Over 1500 members
belong to it. The branch societies are located at Am-
sterdam, Rotterdam, Nijwegen, Delft, Leyden, Shiedam,
Zutphen, Dortrecht, and Harlem. Since 1876 a small
periodical is published quarterly by the society of Hol-
land, containing occasional communications concerning
cremation, and detailing the proceedings of the society.
The funds of the association are in good condition, be-
ing mostly invested in government stock.
The first cinerary furnace built in the German Empire
was erected at Dresden, Saxony, and put in use in 1874,
when bodies were cremated on the 9th of October
and 6th of November; the wife of Sir Charles Dilke
was one of them. No incineration occurred in this
apparatus since that time, owing to a refusal of the
Saxon government to permit the same.
On the 6th and 7th of June, 1876, an international
cremation congress, which was attended by representa-
tives from almost all countries of the globe, was held at
Dresden, and did much to promote the interests of
incineration in Germany. Many important resolutions
were adopted, among others that of forming an inter-
national committee to establish a journal for the propa-
gation of cremation. On June 7, the delegates witnessed
48 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the cineration of several animals in a Siemens apparatus,
which completely reduced the animals experimented
upon in one hour and one-half.
Cremation is now most extensively practiced in Gotha,
in the new crematory established by the municipal
INTERIOR OF WASHINGTON CREMATORY.
The accompanying wood-cut represents that part of the crematory at Washington,
Pa., in which the incineration takes place. The numbers refer respectively to (1) the
incinerator, closed; (2) the fire-box, open; (3) the ash-pit; and (4) coal-bin. The
room, as will be seen, is needlessly plain, and might with slightly increased expense
in building be made more attractive. An ornamental front concealing the brick-work
and the coal-bin would serve greatly to improve its appearance. With a slightly
different arrangement the fire-box and ash-pit might be kept continually out of sight.
If the incinerator were turned end for end and made to open from the opposite side,
nothing would be seen by the friends of the deceased but its open door and rosy light,
which are most attractive to the eye.
council of that city, which was opened to the public on
the 17th of November, 1878.
The first cremation at Gotha came off on the after-
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 49
noon of the 10th of December, 1878, when Mr. Stier,
a civil engineer whose embalmed body had awaited the
completion of the crematorium for some time, was con-
signed to the furnace. Since the establishment of the
crematory, over 500 persons have been incinerated at
Gotha, many of whom were from foreign lands, —
Russia, England, France, America, etc.
Berlin is the center of the reform in Germany. The
Berlin cremation society has an enormous membership,
and counts among its members many persons of dis-
tinction. Altogether the society numbers 534 members,
45 of them being physicians.
Italy may be considered the pioneer of cremation in
modern times ; for there, for the first time, incineration
was practiced in a systematic and improved manner,
and in no land have the cremationists been so active
and energetic in advocating the reform as in this.
From 1774 till 1874 cremation was advocated by
Piattoli, Moleschott, Coletti, Morelli, Du Jardin, Ber-
tain, Castiglione, Pini, and Polli.
Baron Albert Keller, who, though of German descent,
was an Italian citizen and a resident of Milan, and
above all an enthusiastic patron of cremation, deposited
10,000 lire for the cineration of his own body, and
directed that after defraying the costs of his cremation,
the remaining money should be used to form a fund for
the erection of a building exclusively devoted to the
burning of the dead. When this nobleman died in
1874, his last directions were carried out, and the crema-
tion temple which bears his name became, in accordance
with the testament of the deceased, the property of the
city of Milan.
The Italian clergy opposed incineration but very
50 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
little. In the capital of Loinbardy a distinguished prel-
ate even declared that the burning of the dead is in no
wise contrary to the dogma of the church ; and here one
also can witness how priests accompany the body to be
incinerated to the Tarivjg& ^rematorio{^h^ve they say a
last prayer: indeef&yproof' "oF^t^eranc^-Vnd genuine
Christianity. ( J AN 5 1888
The Fourth Mefltiral Gmigiess^'iiel^je* yftlilan on the
5th of September, lSxJ^jfcj^E§ed erS&aj^on, stating that
it is a veritable scientific pr^:r£ss--wriich has the advan-
tage over inhumation in corresponding to the exigencies
of hygiene. It also expressed its conviction that incin-
eration in no way offends against the affection of families
for their defunct, the respect and veneration for human
remains, and the religious principles of the surviving.
The Milan cremation society was organized chiefly
through the efforts of Drs. Pini and Cristoforis, the
latter being elected president. As the Polli-Clericetti
apparatus in the crematorium had not given general
satisfaction, the gasometer behind the temple was
removed, in 1880, and suitable wings were built. Two
furnaces were then erected, one being built on the
Gorini system, in which the ordinary cremations are
performed, and the other on the Venini system, where
cremation of the remains of persons who died from con-
tagious diseases, and of strangers, takes place. The
building also has three columbaria, one on each side of
the crematorium, and an ordinary one in the vaults
below.
Owing to the success of the Milan crematory, crema-
toria were built at Padua, Cremona, Varese, Lodi,
Brescia, and Rome. A cinerary furnace was also
speedily erected in the hospital at Spezzia, by order of
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 51
the Secretary of the Navy ; this apparatus was princi-
pally used for the cremation of cholera victims.
The urns holding the ashes of the cremated cannot
be removed from an Italian columbarium except by
permission of tlxe prefect of the province. The urns
must be tightly closed,~and must bear the name of the
deceased and the,: date of his^or her death. The ashes
of only one body may -be- placed in an urn, the reverse
being strictly "forbidden. Every cremation is registered
both by the board of trustees of the crematory and by
the civil authorities.
Looking over the history of cremation in Italy, one
needs must gain the firm conviction that Dr. Gaetano Pini
of Milan is the most ardent cremationist in his native
country. Whenever a cremation society was organized
there, the indefatigable doctor was on hand, giving ad-
vice and delivering addresses, increasing the zeal of
the advocates of the reform, and encouraging its timid
friends. Really, the amount of labor performed by this
gentleman is truly marvelous. Already the doctor is
reaping the fruits of his philanthropic work. Incinera-
tion is steadily advancing in Italy, and is gaining popu-
lar favor rapidly, and Dr. Pini's name will be handed
down to succeeding generations as that of a benefactor
of his land and people.
Cremation societies now exist at Ancona, Asti, Bo-
logna, Brescia, Capri, Codogno, Como, Cremona, Demo-
dossola, Florence, Genoa, Intra, Livorno, Lodi, Milan,
Modena, Novara, Padua, Parma, Pavia, Perugia, Pia-
cenza, Pisa, Pistoga, San Bemo, Siena, Turin, Undine,
Yarese, Venice, and Verona.
In Spain, where the body of Merino, the man who at-
tempted the assassination of Queen Isabella, was burned
52 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
in 1852, cremation has made as yet but little progress,
but even in this stronghold of Catholicism it can point
to friends.
El Anfiteatro Anatomico Espanol of March 15, 1874,
contains an admirable article on incineration by Don
Federico Gilman. Two pamphlets on the subject also
appeared, one by Enrico Salcedo at Valencia in 1876,
the other by L. Gallardo at Madrid in 1878.
The Board of Public Health at Madrid resolved in
1884 to request the government to make cremation
obligatory during epidemics, and to permit incineration
in all cases where the family of a deceased wish to dis-
pose of him so.
Dr. Cervera, member of the municipal chamber of
Madrid, proposed the erection of a crematory temple in
the new cemetery of that city.
At Lisbon, Portugal, cremation is not only optional,
but the authorities of the city have even issued a decree
making cremation compulsory in time of epidemics.
The cremation movement in Switzerland began in
the spring of 1874. On the 20th of December, 1878,
the municipal council of Zuerich granted leave to erect
a crematorium on a ceded piece of ground in the new
cemetery of that town. I am sorry to say that a crema-
tory has as yet not been erected, owing to a lack of
funds. This deplorable condition is due to a great
extent to the ridiculously small membership-fee and
annual dues of but two francs ; yet, in spite of all this,
success is sure to come in the end, for even this lagging
fund grows yearly. The society at Zuerich now num-
bers nearly 400 members, and is (the fund dilemma
excepted) in a prosperous condition. Wegmann-Erco-
lani is its recognized leader, and must be looked upon
THE HISTORY OF CREMATIOK. 53
as the foremost champion of incineration in Switzer-
land.
In Austria the outlook for cremation is not favorable,
but one need not be surprised at that, for Austria is
known to be one of the most conservative countries in
the world.
In 1658, when several collections of cinerary urns
were discovered in Old Walsingham, Norfolk, England,
Sir Thomas Browne, a learned physician, came forward
with a brilliant dissertation on cremation, which still
holds its rank among standard English literature. This
essay, conspicuous for the erudition displayed, was a
singularly powerful and idiomatic plea for incineration.
The next to take up the righteous cause of cremation
in Great Britain was no less a person than Sir James
Y. Simpson, the eminent surgeon of Edinburgh, Scot-
land. He demonstrated how easy it would be for his
fellow-townsmen to maintain a fire constantly on the
hill of the Hunter's Bog, near Edinburgh. But he, too,
only had in view the ancient pyre ; therefore it is not
astonishing that his efforts were not crowned with
success.
It appears that about the year 1844, the sanction of
the authorities of the city of London was obtained for
the cremation, within the City of London Gas Works,
of the dead of Bridewell Hospital ; an arrangement was
also concluded with the city authorities for the inciner-
ation of bodies of dead prisoners, and of the condemned
meat and offal of the markets. The project, however,
met with so much opposition from certain churchmen
that it fell into abeyance.
In modern times the gong of cineration was first
struck by Sir Henry Thompson, who had become
54 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
enamored with incineration at the Vienna Exposition,
and who earnestly treated of cremation in a brilliant
paper, " The Treatment of the Body after Death," in
The Contemporary Review for January, 1874. This
article, as might be expected, elicited great popular
interest, much approval from all classes of the public,
and some vigorous opposition. It was replied to, in the
February issue of the same periodical, by Mr. Philip
H. Holland, the Medical Inspector of Burials for Eng-
land and Wales, whose statements and arguments,
adroit though some of them were, were properly
refuted in the succeeding number of the Review. Sir
Henry fortified his arguments by citing some experi-
ments with the bodies of lower animals, which he had
burned, with little cost and no inconvenience, in a
Siemens furnace.
For many years prior to 1874, Dr. Lord, health offi-
cer for Hampstead, continued to urge the practical
necessity for the introduction of incremation.
The Cremation Society of England was founded on
the 13th of January, 1874, and no sooner was it estab-
lished than letters of encouragement poured in from all
parts of Great Britain, and there was a great influx of
new members and subscribers to its declaration. Every
cremationist must feel proud to know that among those
who, under Sir Henry Thompson's able presidency,
founded the society, were such men of distinction as
the late Shirley Brooks and Anthony Trollope, the
well-known novelist. The English Cremation Society
was founded for the propagation of the tenets of incin-
eration, not for trading purposes, as may have been
supposed by some incredulous, ill-disposed, or ignorant
minds.
THE HISTORY OF CEEMATION.
In 1878, the society purchased
an acre of ground in a secluded
part of St. John, Woking, in
Surrey, especially adapted by
position for the purpose, and
erected thereon a building, with
an apparatus of the most ap-
proved kind, for effecting crema-
tion of the dead. After some
deliberation, the system of Pro-
fessor Gorini, of Lodi, in Italy,
was adopted, since it was con-
sidered the best for the site, in-
asmuch as no supply of gas is
required to insure combustion,
but only coal or wood. It is to
be regretted, that owing to a lack
of funds, only the furnace could
be built, which standing alone
in spacious fields, must present
rather a dreary aspect; must, I
take it, appear far too realistic.
It is to be hoped that the society
will, by means of large bequests
or sufficient contributions from
the public, be placed in a position
to roof over the furnace, and to
erect a chapel or a hall in front
of it, so as to accommodate the
friends and mourners. The ap-
paratus was next tested by an
experiment, which consisted of
the burning of a portion of the
lii-Sv;
m
: I
56 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
carcass of a horse weighing 140 pounds, that was
consumed in two hours, at a cost of a very small quan-
tity of fuel. The ashes resulting from the combustion
were perfectly white, and weighed a little under six
pounds ; not the slightest odor could be detected in the
closest neighborhood of the furnace, or even with the
doors of the crematory chamber open ; and there was,
moreover, no escape of smoke from the chimney. The
success of the system was established, and the possibility
of cremation without offence completely demonstrated.
Since that time the place has been maintained in per-
fect order, but has not been used, owing to a doubt
raised soon after the date referred to, as to the legality
of adopting the process in England. A deputation of
the cremation society waited upon the Home Secretary
on the 20th of March, 1879, with a view of representing
to the government their own wishes in respect to the
crematory at Woking. The Home Secretary admitted
that the proposed practice was unaffected by existing
law, but he had been advised that inasmuch as the
registration of deaths in her Majesty's country had
always been associated with burial, he was constrained
to conclude that cremation must first be approved by
Parliament, and that if persisted in, he saw no other
course open than to legislate against it. He further
advised the council to introduce a short bill into the
House of Lords, and not to rely upon the opinions of
Queen's counsel which had been obtained by them
affirming that it might be practiced. Thus the so-
called Cameron bill originated. It is strange that
England, so far advanced in political freedom, should
yet be so deficient in intellectual liberty. Among the
English there are doubtless as many unbiased investi-
THE HISTORY OE CREMATION. 57
gators as among any other nation, but both the repre-
sentatives of the people and the government present
the deplorable picture of solicitous embarrassment, and
maintain an obstinate conservatism when any question
involving religion or ecclesiastical rites comes up before
them ; any act that is not seconded by the Church of
England is rejected through non-support; any abuse
which the Established Church desires to retain can not
be removed. That this holds true is evinced by the
repeated failure of the bill permitting a widower to
marry his sister-in-law, notwithstanding that even the
royal family desire to contract such a marriage.
Finally the bill was accepted by the House of Com-
mons, but has been since stubbornly rejected by the
House of Lords.
Dr. Cameron's cremation bill — providing legal sanc-
tion for the adoption of cremation in Great Britain —
was submitted to the House of Commons some time in
1884 — I do not remember the exact date. This bill,
which asked but for permissive incineration, a privilege
that is readily granted in all civilized countries of the
globe, was rejected on the second reading by a vote of
149 to 79. It is a solace to know that the minority in-
cluded the scientific men, men of such world-wide fame
as Sir Lyon Playfair, Sir John Lubbock, and many
others. Mr. Gladstone, zealous in his endeavors to
serve the Church, brought the influence of the Govern-
ment to bear against the bill, pleading in excuse that it
was contrary to public opinion. Every well-balanced
mind must conceive instantly that the Premier might
have reserved the expression of the public will and
opinion for Parliament, but that he wished to oblige
the Church of England. That Englishmen regard
58 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
cremation from the same standpoint as other people is
proven by the 79 favorable votes that were cast.
Mr. W. Eassie delivered excellent addresses on cre-
mation before the first congress of the Sanitary Institute
of Great Britain, held in 1877, at Leamington, and be-
fore the congress at Manchester, in 1879, when he ex-
hibited the model of the Polli-Clericetti apparatus. In
March, 1879, the question of cremation was also pre-
sented to the House of Lords, but without practical
results.
In August, 1880, Sir T. Spencer Wells, late president
of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, and Sur-
geon to the Queen's Household, read a masterly paper
on incineration, entitled " Cremation or Burial," at the
meeting of the British Medical Association, at Cam-
bridge. At its conclusion a memorial was drawn up,
addressed to the Home Secretary, and praying that per-
mission be granted for the practice of cremation. The
address was as follows : —
" We, the undersigned members of the British Medi-
cal Association, assembled at Cambridge, disapprove the
present custom of burying the dead, and desire to substi-
tute some mode which shall rapidly resolve the body
into its component elements by a process which cannot
offend the living, and may render the remains absolutely
innocuous. Until some better mode is devised we desire
to promote that usually known as cremation. As the
process can now be carried out without anything ap-
proaching to nuisance, and as it is not illegal, we trust
the government will not oppose the practice, when con-
vinced that proper regulations are observed and ampler
guarantees of death having occurred from natural causes
are obtained than are now required for burial."
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 59
This memorial was signed by Sir T. Spencer Wells
and many other prominent physicians and surgeons,
altogether by oyer one hundred members of the associa-
tion.
On Jan. 13, 1884, an incident occurred that speedily
wrought a metamorphosis of the whole question regard-
ing the legality of cineration in the United Kingdoms.
There is an eccentric physician of South Wales, who is
known as Dr. Price. He claims to be the nineteenth
century representative of the ancient Druids. His cos-
tume is green trousers, white smock coat, and fox-skin
head-covering. He is an educated physician and a mem-
ber of the British Medical Association. The Druids of
old burned their dead, and the child of Dr. Price having
died, he determined to dispose of her remains by crema-
tion. He retired at nightfall to a hill-top, where, plac-
ing the corpse in a cask of petroleum, he applied the
torch. The burning aroused the populace, who, on
nearing the spot, discovered its purpose. Amid much
excitement the charred remains were rescued, and the
Druid doctor placed under arrest. He was tried at the
Glamorganshire Assizes, Cardiff, and acquitted. Sir
James Stephen, the learned judge, when charging the
grand jury at the trial, stated that Lord Justice Fry
agreed in the views about to be expressed by him. He
reviewed elaborately all the authorities bearing on the
case, and, after discussing the methods of disposing of
the dead in ancient Europe, failed to discover any law,
ancient or modern, which forbids cremation, providing
it be done in such a manner as to cause no nuisance.
This decision, of course, rendered the society free to
act as it pleased. Advertisements were immediately
put in the newspapers, to say that anybody could be
60 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
cremated who would adhere to the rules formulated by
the society. Under these circumstances the cremation
society felt it a duty to indicate, without delay, those
safeguards which they deemed it essential to associate
with the proceeding in order to prevent the destruction
of a body which might have met death by unfair means.
They were aware that the chief practical objection
which can be urged against the employment of crema-
tion consists in the opportunity which it offers, apart
from such precautions, for removing the traces of poison
or other injury which are retained by an undestroyed
body, and therefore framed the sequent rules, which
still hold good : —
" 1. An application in writing must be made by the
friends or executors of the deceased, — unless it has
been made by the deceased person himself during life,
— stating that it was the wish of the deceased to be
cremated after death. 2. A certificate must be sent in
by one qualified medical man at least, who attended
the deceased until the time of death, unhesitatingly
stating that the cause of death was natural, and what
the cause was. 3. If no medical man attended during
the illness, autopsy must be made by a medical officer
appointed by the society, or no cremation can take
place. These conditions being complied with, the coun-
cil of the society reserve the right in all cases of refus-
ing permission for the performance of the cremation,
and, in the event of permitting it, will offer every facil-
ity for its accomplishment in the best manner,"
The Cremation Society of England owes much to its
indefatigable honorary secretary, Mr. William Eassie,
C.E., whose propaganda for incineration is not con-
fined to the British Isles, but extends all over the world.
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 61
I am sure that his name will always head the list of
those who have promoted cremation in the country of
Shakespeare, and in this respect even place him over
and above that illustrious surgeon and physicist, Sir
Henry Thompson. I would not, I am certain, experi-
ence the least astonishment should I hear that Mr.
Eassie sent some of his valuable essays on cineration to
some savage in Africa, for instance the king of Daho-
mey, and that the royal negro, pleased with the idea,
instantly had several hundred of his subjects cremated
before him, which, being a complete success in every
respect, led his dusky majesty to swear by all the holy
idols with which he is familiar that he too should be
reduced to ashes after death.
Public sentiment reflected in the press of the United
Kingdoms has been almost unanimously in favor of
cremation. Journals of all classes, religious, fashiona-
ble, popular, Whig, Radical, or Tory, from the Court
Circular to the Rock, from the Times to Lloyd's Weekly
Newspaper, have by a vast majority pronounced in its
favor.
The Metropolitan Commissioners of Sewers have ap-
pointed a committee with the view of considering the
propriety of erecting a crematorium at Ilford.
The oldest case of cremation on record in Great
Britain was that of a widow, Mrs. Pratt, of George
Street, Hanover Square, London. The lady was burned,
in obedience to directions given in her testament, in
the new graveyard adjoining Tyburn turnpike, on the
26th of September, 1769.
On the 8th and 9th of October, 1882, the wife of
Captain Hanham, and his mother, Lady Hanham, wife
of the late Sir James Hanham, Bart., of Dean's Court,
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 63
Dorset, were cremated in a cheap temporary crematory,
devised by Mr. Richards of Wincanton. The furnace
had been built under the supervision of Captain Han-
ham himself. The coffins were placed on iron plates,
and fire bricks above the furnace, a chimney 22 feet
high furnishing the draught. The process lasted two
hours, and was successful in every respect.
A year later, on the 7th of December, 1883, the cap-
tain, Thomas C. Hanham, was reduced to ashes in the
same apparatus at his residence in Manstone, Dorset-
shire. The incineration was public, and in conformity
with the last testamentary dispositions of the deceased.
The cremation was accomplished in 9 hours and 40
minutes. The ashes were deposited in the family
mausoleum.
The Danish Cremation Society at Copenhagen was
founded in 1881, and is in a nourishing condition. It
has several branch societies in the provinces. Soon
after its organization it numbered 1500 members; it
now counts 1800 members, among them 120 physicians.
Several attempts were made in Denmark to legalize in-
cineration, but in vain : as there is, however, no law
prohibiting the act, the society is determined to imitate
the example of England, to execute incineration at
their own risk, and await further legislation.
Mr. Per Lindell, a civil engineer, did much to popu-
larize cremation in Sweden. For many years he treated
of the subject in the columns of the Nor den, a journal
edited by him. It was through his influence that the
Swedish Cremation Society was established on the 31st
of May, 1882, at Stockholm, under the presidency of
Colonel E. Klingenstierna. At present the society
numbers from 700 to 800 members. There is no law
64 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
forbidding incineration ; the prospects are therefore
very good. As soon as sufficient money is on hand a
crematory will be erected and put in use. A society,
affiliated with the central one, was recently organized
at Gothenburg.
In the neighborhood of the new cemetery, St. Fran-
cisco Xavier, at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, a large space of
ground has been assigned for the erection of a crema-
tory temple. Incineration will be practiced there in
order to lessen, if possible, the alarming rate of mor-
tality in that unhealthy place. Dr. A. Vinelli deserves
great credit for his admirable articles in support of
cremation in the Revista Medica de Rio de Janeiro of
1878.
In the Argentine Republic, Mexico, and Uruguay, a
steady movement is on foot in favor of the reform. The
authorities in Mexico have already granted permission
for the construction of a crematorium on the Gorini
pattern.
It is said that the government of Venezuela has also
decided to erect a crematory, wherein to reduce to in-
nocuous ashes the bodies of persons deceased of yellow
fever.
The idea to propagate cremation at Valparaiso, Chili,
originated with the Lessing Lodge of Free Masons,
which, on the 6th of August, 1881, directed a circular
to the other Masonic lodges of the city, requesting them
to send representatives to a preliminary meeting. This
meeting came off on the 3d of December of the same
year. Cremation was freely discussed from every stand-
point, but on the whole the meeting was not followed
by any practical result.
On the last of December, 1881, a proclamation to
THE HISTORY OF CREMATION. 65
organize a cremation society was published in the jour-
nal II Mercurio by the committee having the matter in
charge. On the 20th of May, 1882, the Cremation
Society of Chili was formed under the presidency of
Serlor O. Malvini. This society is in a flourishing con-
dition, and now numbers over 200 members.
Towards the end of 1883 a committee to organize a
cremation society at Alexandria, Egypt, was formed by
M. Lumel, who, unfortunately, died in the same year.
The committee, however, is still in existence, and is at
present occupied in realizing the ideas of M. Lumel.
At Cairo Messrs. Titus Figari and Cesare Praga labor
to found a cremation society.
CHAPTER II.
THE EVILS OF BURIAL; THE SANITARY ASPECT OF
INCINERATION.
HPHE grave, hallowed by religion and the queen of
-■- arts, poetry, has become to us the emblem of
eternal rest — something that is beautiful; something
in which we may sleep long and well. The weeping-
willow droops its slender branches over it, sweet, fra-
grant flowers thrive upon its soil, and the little birds
perch there to sing their song.
The rays of the sun often play upon the small earth
elevation, and lend additional beauty to the green foli-
age of the trees, the bright color of the many flowers.
But verily, we are like the sunshine — superficial.
It is the great fault of mankind to be satisfied with a
film-like knowledge of things. To go deeper, to dive
below the superstratum, would mean to meet, perhaps,
with matters not at all pleasant; to become cognizant
of facts never before dreamt of. Consequently, the
majority of men is content to remain on the surface ;
content to know a little, but not all.
Thank God, there are happily individuals left who
descend to the bottom of every question, scientific or
social, and who daily enrich all departments of learning.
As regards the grave, let us first of all listen to him
who has held generations of folk spellbound; let us
bow reverently before the opinion of one of the mas-
ters among English novelists — Charles Dickens.
68 CREMATION OF THE DEA£>.
It is he who tells us in measured words that the grave
is naught but —
" Brave lodgings for one, brave lodgings for one,
A few feet of cold earth, when life is done ;
A stone at the head, a stone at the feet,
A rich, juicy meal for the worms to eat ;
Rank grass overhead, and damp clay around,
Brave lodgings for one, these, in holy ground ! "
The late Prof. Samuel D. Gross, M.D., one of the
greatest surgeons the world ever possessed, called
burial a horrible practice, and maintained that ; —
" If people could see the human body after the pro-
cess of decomposition sets in, which is as soon as the
vital spark ceases to exist, they would not want to be
buried ; they would be in favor of cremation. If they
could go into a dissecting-room and see the horrid sights
of the dissecting-table, they would not wish to be
buried. Burying the human body, I think, is a horri-
ble thing. If more was known about the human frame
while undergoing decomposition, people would turn
with horror from the custom of burying their dead.
It takes a human body 50, 60, 80 years — yes, longer
than that — to decay. Think of it! The remains of
a friend lying under six feet of ground, or less, for
that length of time, going through the slow stages of
decay, and other bodies all this time being buried
around these remains. Infants grow up, and pass into
manhood or womanhood; grow old, and get near the
door of death ; and during all that time the body which
was buried in their infancy lies a few feet under ground
in this sickening state, undergoing the slow process of
decay. Think of thousands of such bodies crowded
into a few acres of ground, and then reflect that these
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 69
graves, or many of them, in time fill with water, and
that water percolates through the ground and mixes
with the springs and rivers from which we drink.
" People tarn with dread from the subject of crema-
tion. Why, if they knew what physicians know, —
what they have learned in the dissecting-room, — they
would look upon burning the human body as a beauti-
ful art in comparison with burying it. There is some-
thing eminently repulsive to me about the idea of
lying a few feet under ground for a century, or per-
haps two centuries, going through the process of de-
composition. When I die, I want my body to be
burned.
" Any unprejudiced mind needs but little time to re-
flect in forming a conclusion as to which is the better
method of disposing of the body. Common sense and
reason proclaim in favor of cremation. There is no
reason for keeping up the burial custom, but many
against it ; some of the most practical of which are but
too recently developed to need mention. There is noth-
ing repulsive in the idea of cremation. People's preju-
dice is the only opponent it has. If they could be
awakened to a sense of the horror of crowding thou-
sands of bodies under the ground, to pollute in many
instances the air we breathe and the water we drink,
their prejudice would be overcome ; cremation would
be taken for what it truly is — a beautiful method of
disposing of the body. The friends of the departed can
do as they please with the remains. Take the ashes of
a wife or daughter and put them in an urn ; place it
on your mantelpiece, or in as private a place as you
please. Strew them on the ground if 3^011 like, and let
them assist in bringing forth a blade of grass. This
70 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
would be an advantage over the burial method, where
human bodies only cumber the ground."
This was said by a man who not only showed consid-
erable ability as an operator, and writer on topics of
medicine, but who also was honored by the famous
universities of Cambridge and Oxford, receiving from
them academical titles never conferred except upon the
most distinguished.
We will take a spade (only metaphorically, of
course) and investigate the narrow pit which serves to
hold all that is mortal of man after the spark of life has
extinguished. Now we remove the plants, the clinging
vines, the blooming flowrets. We throw the earth aside
and finally lay bare a coffin. A coffin? Something
that must have been one in the remote past. A sick-
ening odor greets us. We step back to draw a breath
of pure air. At last we muster up sufficient courage
to return to the grave. A touch of the spade causes
the top-board of the box to fall to pieces, and there is
revealed to the sight a spectacle that is horrible. The
ground around the body has been moist and non-
porous; what has remained of the corpse is only a
mass of foul flesh in a state of putrefaction. Is there
anything more -disgusting than such a sight?
Shakespeare says in " As You Like It " : —
" And so, from hour to hour, we ripe and ripe,
And then, from hour to hour, we rot and rot ;
And thereby hangs a tale."
True ! The tale that hangs thereby is illustrative of
the carelessness and ignorance of man alike. The
grave has been at all times a kind of box of Pandora,
with this difference, — it did not require unclosing:
unopened, the grave sent forth its children — pestilence
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 71
and death — to decimate the ranks of the population
of the globe. But all calamities caused by burial have
been endured by people with perfect indifference, and
it was not until modern times that any reforms were
attempted at all. But in spite of these so-called re-
forms, the murder of the living by the dead has con-
tinued. The reforms I mentioned generally resulted
in the removal of cemeteries to the suburbs of cities.
In this way the evil effects of interment were deferred
for some time, till the city enlarged, and the population
closed in around the burial-grounds.
What is burial ? For what purpose do we place the
bodies of our dead in the earth ? It is the beginning of
a chemical process — a process which ends finally in
the total dissolution of the corpse. The chemical con-
stituents of our body are returned to nature. Burial
and cremation are in a sense the same ; in either case
the body oxydates. The great distinction between the
two lies in the fact, that the burning in the grave re-
quires years for its completion, and is fraught with
danger to the living, whilst in case of incineration the
body is reduced to its primitive elements in the brief
space of a few hours, and is unaccompanied by any-
thing that may do harm.
Dr. A. B. Prescott, Professor of Chemistry in the
University of Michigan,, has determined what elements
of the human body are destroyed or dissipated by cre-
mation, and what remain in the ashes. In a letter to
the Detroit Post he states : —
" Of the 70 chemical elements or ultimate simples,
known to man, 15 are found in the human body.
Of these, four — carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen
— are derived from the air, and in combustion, as in
12 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
decay, they return to the air again. These four in
their various compounds make up by far the greater
part of the animal tissues. Of the remaining 11
chemical elements, six are metals, — potassium, so-
dium, calcium, magnesium, iron, and manganese ; and
five are non-metals, — sulphur, phosphorus, chlorine,
fluorine, and silicon. When combustion of the tissues
is completed, the six metals, in combination with the
five non-metals last named, are left behind in the ash.
These were drawn from the earth. There are about
19 chemical compounds in the ash so left, compounds
such as phosphate of lime, carbonate of lime, sulphate
of potash, chloride of sodium, etc. The greater
number of the ultimate elements contained in the
living body are left behind in the ash, but the pro-
portional quantity made up by all these elements is, of
course, very small. In the first place, about two-thirds
of the tissues consist of water. The proportion of the
4 ash ' to the tissues varies from two per cent in muscle
and seven-tenths per cent in blood, to 66 per cent in
bone. The i ash ' left by combustion is very nearly the
same, in kind and in quantity, as the 'dust' left after
the final completion of decay."
What is decomposition ? How does it take place nor-
mally? Decomposition is the decay of an organic
substance, which is completely destroyed through the
influence of the atmospheric oxygen. Decomposition
is facilitated by moisture. The organic mass under-
going such change assumes a different color and consis-
tency and gives up carbonic acid, ammonia, and water ;
the same products originate in the rapid destruction of
an organic substance by means of fire.
Only those parts of the body (the bones) that can
THE EVILS OP BTJBIAL. 7B
best resist the influence of the air remain secure from
decay a longer time ; at last they also crumble into dust
and mingle with the rest.
Wetness accelerates decay. When we hear the rain
fall in the silent night, we are compelled to think,
shuddering, how the horrible process of destruction
begins in the grave of some beloved one whom we have
recently buried.
The same stench that assails our nostrils when we
approach a corpse that has lain a long time above
ground, meets us when we open a grave ; the same
poisonous gases are evolved under ground from a decay-
ing corpus as upon the surface of the earth. It makes
no difference whether the grave we explore be that of a
prime minister, upon which a magnificent monument
rears its costly shaft high into the air, or that of a com-
mon criminal who tried to enjoy existence by spending
three-quarters of his lifetime in prison ; the result
remains the same : in each we find the disgusting and
sickening evidence of slow destruction, — a formless,
putrid mass of flesh, and sometimes numberless revelling
worms.
The conditions under which decomposition can take
place are a certain degree of moisture and a constant
supply of air. When a corpse is embedded in a soil
that is very wet, a curious change takes place. There
is no decay, but instead a fatty metamorphosis, giving
the body a waxy appearance and preserving its original
form. The result of this transformation is called
adipocere. The process by which the body is changed
into this stearine-like mass is entitled saponification,
and is not very well understood as yet by the scientists.
THE CREMATORIUM AT VARESE. (From Dr. Pini's work.)
THE EVILS OF BUEIAL. 75
Such preserved bodies were found in the burial-grounds
at Paris, Brussels, London, and many other cities.
In 1874, the cemetery board of the burial-ground at
Zuerich, Switzerland, discovered that the bodies in-
terred in the graveyard since 1849 had not undergone
decomposition, but had turned into adipocere. This
horrible discovery materially assisted the progress of
incineration in Switzerland.
Tripp relates that when eight bodies were taken up
in a cemetery near Worcester, England, the soil of
which was composed chiefly of gravel and clay that was
always very moist and at times so wet that the water
had to be pumped out of the graves, the undecayed
body of a nineteen-year-old girl was found which had
been buried 51 years and had undergone saponifica-
tion ; the other corpses were decomposed, also the
coffins, while the casket which had contained the
saponified body was preserved.
I have seen but one saponified corpse. It was at the
museum of the New York College of Physicians and
Surgeons; I have forgotten whether it was a man or
woman. But I still remember how I shuddered at the
sight and how I walked close up to the glass case to
make sure that the waxy mass within was a human
being.
It is superfluous to point out here that cremation
puts a stop to saponification. One need not be a chem-
ist to know that a body cannot turn into adipocere after
it has been reduced to ashes.
Whenever the earth of a graveyard yet contains
enough oxygen for the corpses deposited there, the
dangers are very few ; but whenever this is not the case,
the bodies of the dead undergo a horrible metamorphosis.
76 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
known as putrefaction, and become dangerous to the
living on account of the poisonous gases and other
effluvia generated.
We observe the same phenomenon in our stoves.
When but very little air is admitted into them, the
combustion of even very inflammable material remains
incomplete ; and stifling gases (for instance, carbonic
oxide gas) are produced.
It is evident that a porous soil facilitates decomposi-
tion, the products of which it absorbs and retains till
they have entered into some harmless combination.
There is, however, a limit to its efficiency. When it
becomes overcharged with the products of decomposi-
tion, it can only hold a small quantity of them ; the
rest are delivered to the water, which permeates it and
the air which passes over it. On the other hand, it is
clear that a very damp, non-porous soil into which the
air cannot enter favors putrefaction.
A state of saturation is produced in the course of
time in the best of cemeteries by a continued system of
overcrowding.
Although overcrowding of cemeteries is confined al-
most entirely to the countries of Europe, yet there are
many American burial-grounds in which this condition
exists; and, what is worse, they are annually multiply-
ing. Some of these overcrowded graveyards are situ-
ated in large cities, in the centre of a dense population.
In these churchyards it is inrpossible to dig a single
grave without the disinterring of the bones of one pre-
viously buried there. Imagine the consequences of
such a state ! Isn't it far better to remove the possi-
bility of future disease and danger at once than to
allow it to grow by degrees, till it assumes a terrible
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 77
and fatal dimension ? Isn't it better to refrain from the
use of cemeteries entirely, and resort instead to the
clean, pure, and undangerous system of incineration?
Consider! Does it agree with our ideas of right and
wrong to endanger the lives of our great-grandchildren
or their offspring by our methods of disposing of the
dead? For, by the time they appear on the stage of
this world, the burial-ground now sanitary will have
become a breeding-place of disease from overuse.
When we remove burial-grounds to a distance, we
only postpone the evil. We insure our own safety, it
is true, by so doing ; but we encumber the ground with
most virulent seeds, and leave to future generations —
to those who come after us — a terrible crop of pollu-
tion, disease germs, and death. Our own security from
harm should not actuate us in this matter. We should
be wise enough to prevent the evil while we have the
power, so that our offspring will not justly reproach us
for entailing upon them such a terrible legacy.
Among American cities there is none that needs a
change of method in the disposal of its dead as greatly
as New Orleans, in Louisiana.
Those that are mowed down by the grim rider of the
white horse cannot be buried there, owing to the exces-
sive moisture of the ground which surrounds the city
and the proximity of the water to the surface. It is
impossible to dig two feet under ground without com-
ing to water. At all times the dead have been disposed
of in a very careless manner in New Orleans. It is
related that during the yellow-fever epidemic of 1853,
when New Orleans had a population of 150,000 inhabi-
tants, those that had died of the dread disease were
thrown into trenches not over 18 inches or two feet
78 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
deep, and covered with very little earth; so little,
indeed, that the first rain that came along washed it
away. In a graveyard situated in the central part of
the city, were buried in this manner 400 bodies, re-
cent victims of yellow fever, and contaminating the air
with poisonous exhalations. The mayor of the city was
asked to remove the dangerous condition of the burial-
ground. He replied, " That's not my business ! " And
the commissioner of streets, who was next approached,
answered in a like spirit. The state of affairs grew
worse and worse ; and at last, even the negroes refused
to act as grave-diggers.
At present, they have a system of entombment in the
Crescent City. These tombs are in the municipal
cemeteries, 35 of which are within the city limits, giv-
ing them the appearance of a collection of bakers'
ovens. The tombs are almost universally made of
brick, and whitewashed. They vary in size from 3
X 6 feet to 10 X 10 feet or 10 X 20 feet ; there is a post
in the centre, which is surrounded by shelves, on which
the body — that is, the coffin — is deposited. There
the dead rests for about a year, when it becomes neces-
sary to use the tomb for another corpse ; then the
remains of the preceding occupant of the vault are
rudely taken from the casket and dashed head over
heels into a pit, where they are left to breed disease.
* What wonder, exclaims Kate Field, that yellow fever
runs riot in New Orleans, when the air reeks with the
festering corruption of 35 plague spots, exposed for six
months of the year to a tropical sun! Think how the
death-rate of New Orleans might be reduced by aboli-
tion of earth-burials ! What better field for missionary
work than our own " Sunny South " ?
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 79
The unhealthfulness of these vaults is apparent to
all, but, owing to prejudice, no other disposition of the
dead has been adopted. But sooner or later the inhab-
itants of New Orleans must have recourse to cremation,
and burn their dead, as they were forced to do once
during a cholera epidemic, when 135 corpses were con-
signed to the devouring element.
For 300 years English churchyards have been so full
that, like the one in Hamlet, Yorick's bones have had
to be dug out in order to put Ophelia's in. From time
to time the attention of the British authorities was
directed to the shameful state of the cemeteries of the
metropolis and other places. In that case the matter
was brought before Parliament, the government ordered
an investigation, a committee was appointed to examine
the grievances, the committee returned a report with
the testimony of witnesses, and the report was ordered
printed. The report commonly made a very large vol-
ume, which looked exceedingly pretty on the shelf on
which it was placed, but became dusty in a compara-
tively short time from non-use. The excitement had
quieted down, public opinion and the press were paci-
fied, Parliament was satisfied, and the condition of the
burial-grounds remained the same as before.
The cemeteries of Paris, France, are in no better con-
dition ; the mould in the old Cimetiere des Innocents is
literally saturated with corpses; Montmartre and Mont
Parnasse are overcrowded. As for Pere la Chaise, —
the burial-place that has been praised in poetry and
prose (the resting-place of Racine and Moliere), that
has been adjudged the most beautiful cemetery in the
world, — P£re la Chaise is packed with decaying bodies.
A cable dispatch dated Dec. 27, 1883, reported that the
80 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
municipal council of the city of Paris had resolved upon
leaving those that fell during the reign of bloodthirsty
La Commune at Pere la Chaise for a period of 25 years.
Ordinary cadavers must be dug up after five years, to
make room for their ghastly successors.
In Portugal the soil has become so packed with
corpses that an effort was made to enact a law that
after five years all interred bodies should be dug up
and subjected to cremation. This means that after the
dead have saturated the ground with disease-producing
emanations, and have exhaled nearly all their virulent
effluvia into the atmosphere, sacrificing the welfare of
the living to superstition and prejudice, a later incinera-
tion shall take place to save space.
Of American cemeteries, I only need mention Pot-
tersfield of New York, the name of which is not spoken
or heard by an American without an involuntary shud-
der. Our graveyards are, of course, not like the ceme-
teries of the Old World, where the exhumation of bones
takes place daily to make room for the recently de-
ceased, but they will become so unless the damaging
prejudices are laid aside and something is done to pre-
vent such a poisonous and dangerous situation. In
some of the old cemeteries in our cities it has become
impossible to dig another grave.
Rev. John D. Beugless, D.D., thus describes the
burial-grounds of New York City : " Of the great ceme-
teries about New York, there is not one, not even Wood-
land or Greenwood, in the public lots of which three or
more bodies are not put in one grave, — that of John
Doe, who died from ' a bare bodkin,' being sandwiched
between those of Richard Roe and James Low, who
were victims respectively of small-pox and yellow-fever,
THE EVILS OF BUEIAL.
81
In the public or poor quarter of Calvary Cemetery a far
worse state of things obtains — more appalling than
even the fosse commune of Paris, for it is the fosse
commune sans chaux. A trench is dug, seven feet
wide, ten to twelve feet deep, and of indefinite length,
in which the coffins are stowed, tier upon tier, making a
flight of steps, five or more deep, and with not enough
earth to hide one from the next. And this is our
vaunted 4 Christian burial ' in this new country, with
its myriads of broad acres ! What shall our children
THE CREMATORIUM AT BRESCIA. (From Dr. Pini's work.)
say of us, when they come, perforce, from stress of
space, to build their dwellings upon these beds of pesti-
lence?"
That is the way we, " the Christian nation par excel-
lence," treat friendless paupers and criminals. Shame !
shame ! A dog is more decently interred.
The cemeteries of the city of Brooklyn occupy nearly
2000 acres of land. A thoughtful eminent physician
gives it as his opinion that the prevailing southwest
wind, blowing over these corruption, festering plague
spots, carries to Flatbush the germs of typhoid fever
and diphtheria, and swells the death-rate of that city to
its present alarming magnitude.
82 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
The more one considers cremation, the more one finds
himself wondering how it has come to pass that we
practice interment, with its many faults and dangers,
and do not burn our dead.
It is clear that overcrowding of burial-grounds must
lead to evil consequences. A ground that is saturated
with putrefying material can emit naught but poisonous
odors, cannot fail to contaminate the purest and clearest
water, must vitiate any atmosphere.
Incineration deserves the respect to-day which the
ancients paid to it, and is the only way of disposing of
the dead so as to avoid the terrible consequences of the
mephitic graveyard gases, of the dangers with which
the ordinary mode of burial threatens us.
The truth was taught us by the Tuscans some three
hundred years ago. At that time a whale was cast upon
the shore of Tuscany. The inhabitants of the surround-
ing country hastened to the spot, and removed the ribs
of the large fish, to hang them in the churches as a
memento of the rare occurrence. The flesh was left to
rot in the scorching southern sun. An epidemic of
typhoid fever was the result; and when, ten years later,
another whale happened to strand in the same locality,
the people, having become wise by its previous expe-
rience, destroyed the monster by chopping it to pieces,
and burning these, one after another.
There are many lurking dangers, ready to destroy the
living, in the burial-grounds of the present day. The
mephitic vapors increase in quantity as decomposition
advances, and become far more poisonous than either
arsenic or prussic acid, if these were uncombined in
their natural state.
These dangerous graveyard gases can spread to quite
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 88
a distance, and therefore can communicate the most
malignant maladies at all times. Dr. Ayr claims that
they extend to a distance of a hundred meters ; some
authorities assert that they reach sometimes twice the
distance. This occurs generally when the grave is air-
tight above, and the surface layer of the cemetery soil is
imporous. Then the gas escapes where it finds the least
resistance, — at the sides, — and burrows along under
the earth until it strikes a cavity, and bursts into it, or
diffuses into the air. When the grave offers no resis-
tance above, the gas enters the atmosphere directly.
Burial-grounds best fitted for cemetery purposes should
be feared most, for it is evident that dryness and
porousness are qualities which, although conducive to
the rapid decay of a body, very much facilitate the
escape of gases.
The danger is not obviated by deep burials. In that
case the morbific matter is diffused through the sub-
soil. If the inhumations are so deep as to impede
escapes at the surface, there is only the greater danger
of escape by deep drainage, and the pollution of
springs and wells. Dr. Reicl detected the escape of
deleterious miasma from graves more than twenty feet
deep.
The danger from inhaling graveyard gases is great.
Ramazzini relates how an avaricious grave-digger, by
the name of Pisto, met with instantaneous death on de-
scending into a vault to steal the shoes of a corpse ; he
was found dead upon the body.
Lancisius (De noxiis palucl. effluv. II, Ep. 1, c. 2,
p. 152) states that several grave-diggers died in a like
manner after entering a newly opened vault, which had
been set under water by an inundation of the Tiber,
84 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
and in which the stagnant water had regenerated the
virulent gases.
Unger gives an account of a case similar to that of
Haguenot, reported further on. A vault was reopened
in a convent at Madrid, for the purpose of depositing
therein a fresh corpse. When the grave-digger was
about to descend into it, he fell down dead. Two other
persons, who tried to save him, shared his fate.
Fortunatus Licetus (De annull. antiquitt. c. 23) re-
lates that three men, who went into a vault that was
full of semi-decomposed bodies with the intention of
robbing, lost their lives. When the bodies were ex-
tracted, they were found to be swollen and black.
Th. Bartholini (Historiar. anat. rarior. C. IV, obs. 32,
p. 296) made experiments in Denmark which confirm
these reports concerning the lethal action of graveyard
gases, and prove the especial danger from the gases of
the dead long pent up in vaults. He affirms that these
noxious gases often prove fatal, death being preceded
by dizziness and fainting.
The gases of Francis I operated with fatal effect
upon the vandals who broke open his coffin, in the time
of the French Revolution, to rob it of its treasures.
Books on hygiene teem with examples of the lethal
properties of an atmosphere containing carbonic acid
in excess. A familiar instance is that of the passen-
gers of the ship Londonderry, in 1848, 150 of whom
were shut up by the captain during a storm, in the
steerage 18 X 11 X 7 feet. Seventy of them died in an
incredibly short space of time, with convulsions and
bleeding at the eyes and ears.
Haguenot reports that, in 1744, the corpse of a monk
of the Penitent Order, who had been buried in a vault
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 85
under the church, was exhumed in the church of Notre
Dame, at Montpellier, France. A man descended into
the vault to remove the cadaver, but, before he got
quite down, he was taken with convulsions, and fell
unconscious into the vault, where he died of suffoca-
tion. A monk went down to rescue him, but he too
was taken sick, and, on having been pulled out imme-
diately, succumbed quickly. A third, who had the
courage to follow his example, fell dead without being
able to retire. The same fate was reserved for a fourth
victim, — a brother of the first. The bodies were pulled
out with hooks ; the stench of their clothing was un-
bearable. Lights held near the opening of the vault
extinguished; dogs, cats, and birds, on being brought
in contact with the poisonous gases, died, with all symp-
toms of a severe convulsion, in a few minutes. Some
of the mephitic gas was bottled ; but when experi-
mented with after two and one-half months, it still had
all of its dangerous qualities.
In 1749, when new vaults and graves were made in
the St. Eustachius Church at Paris, France, cadavers
were dug up and placed temporarily in an old vault of
the church, which had remained locked a long time.
Children coming to church to prepare for confirmation,
and even adults, fainted on entering the sacred edifice,
and some had serious attacks of illness. The same
took place in St. Sebastian Church at Madrid, Spain, in
1786 ; three times a grave burst open, in which, but a
short time before, a very corpulent lady had been
buried. The horrible smell that arose from this grave
prevented the reading of the holy mass at the high
altar during a period of eight days. At one time the
Parish Church of Metz was so infected by the gases of
86 CBEMATIOK OF THE DEAD.
a female corpse that it had to be abandoned, and the
divine service removed to another church.
In 1841 two men who had some work to do in a
grave in St. Botolph's Churchyard, Aldgate, England,
died almost instantly on entering it.
In the churchyard at Cobham, in Surrey, England,
on account of some changes in the church, some bodies
had to be raised. The work of the navvies was horri-
ble beyond description, and dangerous beside. It was
performed very early iu the morning, and was beset
with difficulties. Repeated doses of gin had to be
given to the men to keep them at a kind of work
which they could only do under the influence of alco-
hol. Three men perished in 1852, at Paris, from in-
haling the gas that escaped from coffins.
Fourcroy affirms that grave-digging is an unhealthy
and dangerous occupation, and that all grave-diggers he
examined showed symptoms of slow poisoning.
George A. Walker declared that no grave-digger ever
wholly escaped the influence of graveyard gases.
Some of the men employed in this way have noticed
the peculiar smell of the gases on beginning to dig.
Monsieur Patissier reports several deaths due to
grave-digging ; and Mr. Chad wick asserts that the voca-
tion of a sexton shortens life one-third. Usually grave-
diggers are heavy drinkers ; they take to drinking to
resist the malignant influence of the vapors which arise
slowly but surely out of the cemetery soil, and to do
away with any " maudlin sentimentality " that may still
linger in their hearts, and that might interfere with
their horrible work.
On March 1, 1886, Marke Thornton, of Washington,
Ga., met with a singular death. His decease resulted
THE EVILS OP BTJEIAL. 87
from inhaling poisonous gas which seeped through into
a grave he was digging by the side of another. The
other men at work with him left the grave as soon as
they detected the gas, but Thornton, thinking there was
no danger in it, remained and died.
The action of cemetery gases on the human body
manifests itself in a variety of ways. Sir T. Spencer
Wells states that decomposing human remains so pollute
earth, air, and water as to diminish the general health
and average duration of life.
Dr. Lyon Playfair affirms that the inspiration of
graveyard gases does not always cause one form of
decay or putrefaction, but that it depends entirely upon
the organs attacked. Entering the blood, it produces
fever ; communicated to the viscera, it gives origin to
diarrhoea, and may, Dr. Playfair thinks, even be the
source of consumption. When the irrespirable gas
enters the respiratory tract, Dr. Southwood Smith
claims that it is conveyed into the system through the
thin and delicate walls of the air-vesicles of the lungs
in the act of respiration. He states that turpentine, for
instance, if only inhaled when passing through a room
that was recently painted, will exhibit its effects in
some of the fluid excretions of the body even more
rapidly than if it- had been taken into the stomach.
Dr. Riecke thinks that putrid emanations operate also
through the olfactory nerves by powerful, penetrating,
and offensive smells.
Cemeteries are breeding grounds as well as foci of
disease and death.
Mr. Chadwick, in his " Report on the Practice of In-
terment in Towns " (London, 1843), writes : —
"The injurious effects of exhalations from the de-
gg CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
composition in question on the health and life of man
is proved by a sufficient number of trustworthy facts.
The injurious influence is manifest in proportion to the
concentration of the emanations. Sometimes it pro-
duces asphyxia and sudden death. In a less concen-
trated state the emanations produce fainting, nausea,
headache, languor. If, however, they are often repeated,
THE CREMATORIUM AT WOKING, ENGLAND.
they produce nervous and other fevers, or impart to
fevers arising from other causes a typhoid type. . . .
As there appear to be no cases in which the emana-
tions from decomposing human remains are not of a
deleterious nature, so there is no case in which the
liability to danger should be incurred by interment
amidst the dwellings of the living, it being established
as a general conclusion that all interments in towns
THE EVILS OF BtJRIAL. 89
where bodies decompose, contribute to the mass of
atmospheric impurity which is injurious to public
health."
The Italian physician Felix Dell'Acqua gives it as
his opinion (in his study on cremation), that graveyards
infect the earth, the air, and the water, and constantly
endanger public health during an epidemic. Dr. Polli
proved that graves deteriorate the air we breathe and
contaminate the water we drink, by loading them with
organic matter.
Prof. Antonio Selmi, of Mantua, claims to have dis-
covered organic germs in the air above graves, which
he called septopneuma, and which, when injected under
the skin of a pigeon, caused a typhus-like disease that
ended in death within three days.
Specific germs may enter the atmosphere from the
graves, which convey the deadliest of maladies, being
carried very far by the wind. But the agent that
makes cemetery gases so dangerous is carbonic acid.
Dr. Parkes (Practical Hygiene), the eminent English
scientist, says : —
" The decomposition of bodies gives rise to a very
large amount of carbonic acid. Ammonia and an offen-
sive putrid vapor are also given off. The air of most
cemeteries is richer in carbonic acid, and the organic
matter is perceptibly large, when tested by potassium
permanganate."
It is a well-known fact that carbonic acid, when
inhaled in an undiluted state, causes death ; it is fatal
to all forms of life. When inhaled diluted with air
it interferes with the introduction of oxygen into the
body, and causes the carbonic acid, which should be
eliminated, to be retained. This, no doubt, prevents
90 CREMATIOK OF THE DEAD.
the proper tissue changes, and must in time undermine
the healthiest body by seriously affecting its nutrition.
Dr. E. J. Bermingham (Disposal of the Dead) says: —
"The effect of constantly breathing an atmosphere
containing an excess of carbonic acid is not perfectly
known. Dr. Angus Smith has attempted to determine
the effect of carbonic acid per se — the influence of
organic matter of respiration being eliminated. He
found that three volumes per thousand caused great
feebleness of the circulation, with diminished rapidity
of the heart's action ; the respirations were, on the con-
trary, quickened, and were sometimes gasping. These
effects were lessened when the amount of carbonic acid
was smaller; but were perceptible when the amount
was as low as one volume per thousand."
According to Haberman, sensitive and nervous per-
sons have been taken ill when walking by a cemetery.
P. Frazer, Jr., says: " A sexton and the son of a lady
who died seven days before went down into the vault.
Both were affected with sickness and nausea ; one was
affected for some years ; the son had ulceration of the
throat for two years."
Mr. William Eassie affirms that, "according to a
report of the French Academy of Medicine, the putrid
emanations of Pere la Chaise, Montmartre, and Mont-
Parnasse have caused frightful diseases of the throat
and lungs, to which numbers of both sexes fall victims
every year. Thus a dreadful throat disease which
baffles the skill of our most experienced medical men,
and which carries off its victims in a few hours, is traced
to the absorption of vitiated air into the windpipe, and
has been observed to rage with the greatest violence in
those quarters situated nearest to cemeteries."
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 91
The most common diseases produced by graveyard
gases are diphtheria, throat and pulmonary affections,
severe diarrhoea, and dysentery. The number of cases
reported is enormous. Many cases have been made
public by Drs. Parkes and Tardieu.
Ramazzini (Maladies des Artisans, p. 71) asserts
that sextons, whose business often compels them to
enter places where there are putrefying bodies, are
subject to malignant fevers, asphyxia, and suffocating
catarrhs.
Fourcroy affirms that there are innumerable examples
of the pernicious effects of cadaveric exhalations.
It has been stated that the carbonic acid generated
by the decaying bodies is taken up by the plants,
shrubbery, and trees abounding in cemeteries and their
neighborhood. That excellent and well-edited news-
paper Iron declares: "The consumption of vegetables
whose roots had been nourished by the defunct mem-
bers of a family would hardly be enjoyed by the sur-
vivors, unless, indeed, they possessed the philosophic
mind and robust appetite of the French gentleman who
declared that, with a certain sauce, ' on manger ait Men
son pere.' "
I do not believe that very much carbonic acid is
absorbed by the botanical burial-ground decorations ;
certainly not enough to prevent its toxic action and
the vitiation of the air.
Many a time was premature exhumation followed by
fatal consequences.
In the church of a village near Nantes, France, the
remains of an aristocrat were buried in 1774. By acci-
dent some of the other graves were opened, among them
one which contained the corpse of a man who had been
92 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
buried three months before. An unbearable odor
immediately filled the church. Many persons who
had attended at this burial were taken sick ; fifteen
died in a short time, the first to depart being the grave-
digger who had opened the graves.
Vicq d'Azyr states that an epidemic was produced in
Auvergne, by the opening of an old graveyard.
Norman Chevers (European Soldiers in India, p. 404)
refers to the unhealthiness of the continent at Sukkur,
India. Fevers of the most malignant type were abound-
ing, owing to an ancient Mussulman burial-ground on
which the station was placed.
Tardieu, the eminent French physician and scientist,
relates (Diet. d'Hygiene, p. 517) that the excavation
of an old cemetery of a convent in Paris caused illness
in the occupants of the adjacent dwellings. Tardieu
(Ibid., p. 463) compiled a very considerable number of
cases, not only of asphyxia, but of several febrile af-
fections produced by exhumation and disturbance of
bodies.
Bascom relates that when the parish church in Min-
chinhampton, England, was rebuilding in 1843, the
black earth of the cemetery surrounding it, or what
was superfluous, was disposed of for manure, being
spread upon adjoining fields. The earth was removed
\o change the grade of the churchyard. The result
was that an epidemic broke out in the neighborhood.
Children on their way to school took it. Seventeen
deaths occurred, and more than 200 children had mea-
sles, scarlet fever, and various eruptions.
It seems, however, as though the above figures are
not quite correct, for Mr. Eassie, who has lately made
personal inquiries upon the spot, insists that the mischief
THE EVILS OF BUEIAL. 93
which resulted has been even understated, and that the
population was nearly decimated.
Dr. Adalbert Kuettlinger brings forward the sequent
case to prove the deleterious action of cemetery gases.
A very obese lady died during the month of July, 1854.
Previous to death she had requested, as a special favor,
that her remains be buried in the church to which she
belonged. This was granted and promised her. After
her demise she was interred in a vault of the church,
and the next clay the minister delivered the funeral
oration. It was very warm that day; several months
before the lady's departure there had been aridity, and
not a drop of rain had fallen in a long time. The
funeral sermon had been delivered on a Saturday ; on the
following Sunday the Protestant clergyman preached to
an assemblage of nearly 900, who had come to attend
the Lord's Supper. The warm weather still continued ;
many had to leave church during the service to keep
from fainting ; many swooned away before they could
withdraw. In Germany people fast before they com-
municate. The sermon lasted nearly one hour and one
quarter, after which the bread was consecrated and
stood uncovered — according to custom — during the
ceremony. There were 180 communicants. One quar-
ter of an hour after the solemnity, before they had time
to leave the church, more than 60 became ill ; some
died in severe convulsions; others, who had placed
themselves immediately under medical treatment, re-
covered. The consternation among the whole congre-
gation and citizens was great. There was a general
belief that the wine used at the communion had been
poisoned. The sexton and some other individuals who
assisted at divine service were imprisoned. The next
94 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Sunday the minister delivered a severe sermon, and
pointed out several of his parishioners as participants in
the conspiracy. This enthusiastic sermon was printed
and widely circulated. The prisoners had to endure
cruel treatment. They remained incarcerated a whole
week, and some, it is said, were tortured; yet they
always insisted upon their innocence. The second
Sunda}^ from the time of the fatal occurrence, the city
authorities ordered that a chalice should stand uncov-
ered on the altar one hour. The time had hardly passed
when it was noticed that the wine was covered with
thousands of little insects, which, by means of the sun-
beams, were traced to the grave of the corpulent lady
who had been buried fourteen days before. Four men
were commissioned to open the vault and remove the
coffin. When they attempted this, two of them died
at once, and the others were only saved by the great
efforts of the physician in attendance. The accused
were liberated, and the city council and clergyman
begged their pardon.
Rev. Dr. Render, in " A Tour through Germany,"
says : —
" Two of the crew of an American merchant ship
went ashore near Canton, to dig a grave to bury a dead
shipmate. The spade struck and penetrated a coffin of
a man buried a few months before, and the discharge
of gas struck down both the sailors, who, though taken
back to the ship, died within five days."
I doubt that there is any one who will assert that it
is delightful to drink an aqueous solution of one's own
grandfather or great-grandmother, yet there are many
who do so. The emanations from our ancestors may
and do filter through the earth, and get into the water
we drink. Think of that !
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 95
Wells, springs, and rivers are polluted by the infil-
tration of water highly charged with organic matter.
Often such water has been the cause of fatal disease,
yet nothing was done to guard against it.
Prof. Victor C. Vaughan, M.D., Ph.D., of the Uni-
versity of Michigan, in a paper on " Water Supply,"
THE DORCHESTERSHIRE CREMATION FURNACE.
read at a sanitary convention at Ypsilanti, Mich., July
1, 1885, states : —
" To show you the stupidity and recklessness of peo-
ple, even in this enlightened century, which is mani-
fested concerning the contamination of water, I must
mention one other case. There is in the county of
Kalamazoo, in this state, a nice little village by the
name of Richland. It is situated in a most beautiful
farming country. The farmers of that region have
grown rich on account of the fertility of the soil and
other special advantages. A few years ago the village
96 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
board desired to select a new site for a cemetery, and
chose one within the village limits, and within 30 rods
of a well owned by an old physician, Dr. Patchin. I
always tell names in such cases, because they tell the
truth, and any one can investigate them. The old doc-
tor objected to the location of the cemetery so near his
house and well, and as the result of his objection there
was a lawsuit ; and if you will pardon me, I will men-
tion something of the condition of the land and some
experiments that were made. There were some 18
inches of rich prairie land, then below this some two or
three feet of hard-pan, below this there were 18 or 20
feet of gravel, such as we have all through the southern
part of Michigan. In digging the graves the bodies
would be put into this gravel. The gravel was so loose
and so moist that in digging graves it was necessary to
put in boxing to prevent the gravel from pouring in
while the grave was being dug. Below the gravel, and
about 30 feet below the surface, was an impervious bed
of clay, with a slope from the cemetery towards the
well. It became a question now as to whether there
was a possibility of the contamination of this well from
burying bodies in the proposed new cemetery. I was
called, and after studying the geological formation, con-
cluded that there was a possibility of such contamina-
tion. The Avell was pumped dry twice a day, and on
an average fifteen barrels taken from it each pumping.
To show how ridiculous some theories are that have
been advanced upon that subject, I will state that I was
met in court with this statement: that it would be im-
possible for any of the water or rain falling upon this
cemetery, 30 rods distant, to reach the well, because, as
was found in some old book, all the water that goes into
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 97
a well is that which falls upon a surface which will be
enclosed in a circle whose center was the mouth of the
well, and whose radius was the depth of the well. This
statement was made independent of any lay of the land
or the geological formation, and without any considera-
tion whatever of the surrounding country. Fortunately
this can be met very easily. Thirty barrels of water
were pumped from the well each day. We know the
amount of rainfall in Michigan per year, and we can
calculate very easily the number of barrels that would
fall upon this surface enclosed in a circle whose center
was the mouth of the well, and whose radius was the
depth of the well ; and as the result of such a calcula-
tion we find that the amount of rain falling upon this
surface during the year would not supply the well more
than two or three days. Returning home and detail-
ing the trip to Dr. Langley, he suggested that a direct
experiment might be made to see whether matter
would pass from the proposed cemetery to the well or
not. He tested the water of the well for lithium, a
substance easily detected, found it was absent, then had
a salt of lithium sown over the proposed cemetery, and
then examined the water of the well each day there-
after; and on the eighteenth day after the lithium was
sown over the cemetery it was found in the water of the
well, showing that the water did unquestionably pene-
trate the soil, pass down to the impervious bed of clay
which was the watershed upon which the water in
the well collected, and thence into the well. Not-
withstanding proofs so positive as this, a learned judge
in Michigan dismissed the case, and allowed the ceme-
tery to be located there, with a possibility of poisoning
a number of families. As a result, the families of the
98 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
neighborhood had to discontinue the use of their well-
water."
Professor Vaughan holds that the popular belief that
if water filters for any distance through the soil it is
purified, is an erroneous belief, and cites a number of
experiments made by himself, and numerous cases, in
support of the assertion.
According to Dr. H. B. Baker, secretary of the
Michigan State Board of Health (vide Report for 1874,
p. 136), a terrible epidemic of cerebro-spinal meningi-
tis, that wasted the village of Petersburg in the early
part of 1874, was attributable to a spring five paces
from a house and 15 paces from a cemetery, which is on
ground from 12 to 15 feet higher than the level of the
spring. About 18 paces from the spring was a recent
grave.
Prof. R. C. Kedzie, of the Michigan State Agricul-
tural College, to whom some of the water was sent for
analysis, concluded his report as follows : —
" The presence in these wafers of unusual quantities
of chlorides, of ammonia, of albuminoid ammonia, of
nitrates and nitrites, and finally of phosphates, shows
these waters to be very unusual in their composition.
We might account for the presence of all these sub-
stances if matters very rich in nitrogen and phospho-
rus, e.g., flesh, were undergoing decomposition in their
vicinity, and the results of this decomposition passed
directly into this water. The fact that the spring is
near and lies below the level of the graveyard, that the
well is in the midst of an old Indian graveyard, gives
much plausibility to this explanation. The fact that
the first person attacked with cerebro-spinal meningitis
in Petersburg used the water of this well, and that
THE EVILS OF BURIAL. 99
others who used the spring water were attacked with
the same disease, would very naturally attract very sig-
nificant attention to the composition of these waters as
having some possible connection with the epidemic."
For several years many residents of Nyack, N.Y., have
protested against the encroachment of the Oak Hill
Cemetery property upon the thickly populated portions
of the village, objections being principally made on
sanitary grounds. Examination of the ponds and
wells of the village has demonstrated that they are
being constantly polluted by the emanations from the
cemetery.
Not long ago the Detroit Evening Netvs declared that
the wells in the neighborhood of Woodmere Cemetery
do not catch the rainwater until after it has been fil-
tered through the thousands of graves in the cemetery,
filled with decaying bodies, and that no water is
obtained in the vicinity which is not discolored and has
a brackish taste. After a heavy rain the impurities are
most pronounced. The residents of Woodmere have
long ago given over the use of water as a beverage. I
do not blame them. I would not like to drink fluid ex-
tract of dead man myself.
The New York Staats Zeitung, a reliable German pub-
lication, of May 27, 1886, relates that a lawsuit of North
Bergen Township, N.J., against the Weehawken Cem-
etery Company, was tried the preceding day before Vice-
Chancellor Van Fleet, at Newark, N.J. The town-
ship demands that for sanitary reasons the cemetery
shall be closed at once and no further burials permitted
in the same. Several physicians testified to the fact
that diphtheria and other infectious diseases are en-
demic in the township, and that they are due mainly to
100 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the unhygienic state of the cemetery, which lies in the
most populated part of the township. One physician
gave it as his opinion that numerous cases of diphthe-
ria that appeared among the little pupils of a school
was caused by drinking water from a well in the prox-
imity of the cemetery.
In an address on " Public Health, or Sanitary Sci-
ence," read before the medical society of the state of
West Virginia, May 24, 1882, Dr. T. S. Camden says ; —
" The Board of Health report for 1879 gives the in-
vestigation of an outbreak of diphtheria in Northern
Vermont, which occurred in May, 1879. In a school of
22 persons, 16 were prostrated in two days, one-half of
whom died. Upon investigation the cause of the out-
break was found to be from the public drinking water
from a brook into which had been thrown the carcasses
of dead animals. Another outbreak of the disease of
great virulence was caused by persons rising water that
was poisoned by the dead carcass of an animal that had
been buried 75 feet distant from a spring. The grass
in this instance showed by its luxuriance the trace to
the spring. After the germs were once developed in
many of these cases by drinking the polluted water, the
disease was communicated to other persons far removed
from the cause of the primary outbreak. One conva-
lescent patient communicated the disease to six persons.
Numerous illustrations of the importance of sanitary
regulations are given in these epidemics."
Thus we have illustrations of the origin of diphtheria
from putrid animal matter; and, after the germs were
implanted in persons, fatal epidemics spread, and many
lives were lost that could have been saved b}^ proper
hygienic measures.
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 101
Dr. Prosper de Pietra Santa, the most enthusiastic
French cremationist, and a man who has investigated
everything pertaining to incineration thoroughly, calls
attention to the example of the villages of Rotondella
and Bollita. The burial-grounds of these ill-starred vil-
lages were situated on the summit of hills that were
beset with woods. They were at the lawful distance,
and to all appearances in a most favorable location.
Unfortunately, the springs from which the inhabitants
were accustomed to derive their water supply emerged
from the base of the hills which were surmounted by
the woods. These springs were the result of collections
of rain-water, which, percolating through the earth of
the hills, became impregnated with the organic matter
which the ground contained. In the course of time,
the drinking-water of these two villages became so con-
taminated that it caused a frightful epidemic.
Prof. Dr. E. Reichardt, of Jena (G-esundheit I, No. 1),
published a large number of cases in which drinking-
water was polluted by cemetery emanations.
Many cases are on record where water contaminated
by graveyard emanations, by poisonous fluids oozing
through the soil, has proven harmful to health. Numer-
ous cases of typhoid fever sprung from this source.
Contagious diseases can also be communicated in this
way. Riecke and Gal tie have compiled statistics of
cases of typhoid fever and other contagious maladies
due to this cause that withstand the severest criticism.
"The rivers die into offensive pools,
And, charged with putrefaction, breathe a gross
And mortal nuisance into all the air."
Kate Field, the well-known author and lecturer, says :
102 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
"These are times that are trying men's and women's
bodies quite as much as their souls. The zymotic dis-
eases breaking out in what were formerly healthy vil-
lages may set even the blindest to seek for causes ; and
CREMATION IN THE CASEMENTS OF PARIS DURING THE REIGN OF
THE COMMUNE.
perhaps the most prejudiced may finally be forced to
admit that one great source of water contamination is
the existence of multitudinous graveyards contiguous
to habitations. In my daily excursions on horseback,
which cover about 15 miles, I count seven graveyards
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 103
perched on hills, the occupants of the adjacent towns
preparing for speedy exit from this world by living
below the dead and using well-water. Suggest to them
that the prevailing i malaria ' may be due to drinking
up the remains of their deceased ancestors, and a howl
of ' sacrilege ' rends the air."
And in an admirable essay on cremation in the St.
Louis Daily Globe-Democrat of July 12, 1885, this
graceful writer, deservedly noted, states: —
"New England villages, once so free from ills, are
taking on the airs of invalids ; and it is often a question
whether families that remain in big towns during the
summer are not better off than their wealthier neigh-
bors, who hie to overcrowded so-called watering places,
not unfrequently returning with germs of typhoid fever
in their systems, that later breaks forth to their amaze-
ment, and for which they are at a loss to account.
They forget how they drank well-water, the springs of
which percolated through peaceful village graveyards.
Man's worst enemies are his own superstition and
ignorance.
" I learned by terrible experience when very young
the horrors of earth burial. I now know its crime
against the living."
Miss Field is not only converted to but convinced of
incineration, convinced that it is preferable to any other
method; the moment a cremation society was incor-
porated in New York, she became a member.
Col. R. E. Whitman, U. S. A., remarks: "People
who wonder at the change that has come over our New
England villages, the homes of a vigorous ancestry, and
deplore the advent of this mysterious ' malaria,' the
unseen vampire that sucks the red blood of the present
104 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
generation, would do well to look about them and see
how the graveyards, old and new, have grown in two
centuries, how the town has surrounded them; how the
water supply is from the same old wells; how the town,
never having arrived at a magnitude seeming to demand
a sewerage system, allows the refuse of generations to
mingle with the surface soil. It would be a theme
worthy of the magic pen of Nathaniel Hawthorne.
Imagine his description of water percolating through
the grave of some despised Lazarus, feeding the well
of his life enemy, Dives, and compelling him daily to
quaff the poison his own cruel ignorance had dis-
tilled."
Undoubtedly many country towns whose cemeteries
are in their midst are drinking daily, despite the
acknowledged impurity of the water, disease and death.
An English writer very pertinently remarks that "if
the formation of a deep sewer will suffice to drain dry
the wells near its line of march, then the sinking of a
well near a burying-ground must help to drain the
latter."
Much complaint was at one time made in England,
concerning the pollution of wells by cemeteries. In
Versailles, France, the water of the wells which lie
below the churchyard of St. Louis, could not be used
on account of its pollution.
Deep wells have been found to be infected more than
600 feet from the cemeteries. In France and in some
parts of Germany, the opening of wells within 300 feet
of a cemetery has been prohibited. The reports of the
boards of health of Massachusetts and New Jersey give
abundant evidence that country graveyards often con-
taminate the water supply when the wells are on a
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 105
lower level. The Michigan reports also contain a
description of a case that occurred at Grand Rapids.
A hygienic council held some time ago at Brussels
decided that wells could not be safely dug nearer than
400 yards to any graveyard, and that even at that
distance absolute protection was not certain.
The constant prevalence of dysentery at Secundera-
bad, in the Deccan (India), seems to have been partly
due to the water which filtered through an extensive
burial-ground. One of the sources of water contained,
by analysis, according to Dr. Parkes, 119 grains of
solids per gallon ; and in some instances there were
8, 11, and even 30 grains per gallon, of organic matter.
Sir J. McGrigor partly attributed the fatality of
dysentery in the Peninsula, at Ciudad Roderigo, to the
use of water percolating through a graveyard in which
nearly 20,000 bodies had been hastily inhumed.
Medical Councilor, Dr. Kuechenmeister, who exam-
ined the wells of Dresden, Germany, discovered the
water to be very impure, especially in the new parts of
the city, and in the vicinity of the so-called " French "
graves. The same results were arrived at in Zuerich,
where it was demonstrated that the typhoid fever epi-
demic of Auszerbuehl was due to water rendered
impure by cadaveric effluvia.
In Philadelphia, three cemeteries, containing 80,000
graves, are so situated as to be liable to drain into the
Schuylkill, the drinking-water of 1,000,000 of people.
The diarrhoea prevalent during the Centennial Exhibi-
tion in the Quaker City is said (by many eminent sani-
tarians) to have been caused by burial-ground water
drunk by strangers unaccustomed to it.
The monumental cemetery at Milan, which is situated
106 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
upon a hill some 180 yards to the north of the city,
was proved to have been the cause of serious illness in
its neighborhood, produced by the contamination of the
wells in the vicinity. The water of the well of the
Place Garibaldi was analyzed by Professors Parvesi
and Rotundi, who found it tainted by organic matter.
The Atlanta Medical Journal states that two young
ladies who drank water from a spring situated on a
hillside, near an old graveyard, became severely ill.
One was seized with pyaemia and diarrhoea, the other
with typhoid fever ; both died. Cattle that drank of
the water were also made sick.
Professor Pumpilly has made certain by recent experi-
ments that sandy soil does not prevent bacterial infection
from entering a well situated at a considerable distance
from cesspools and cemeteries. Indeed, he claims further
that "dry gravel and coarse sand do not prevent the
entrance into houses built upon them of those micro-
organisms which swarm in the ground-air, around leaky
cesspools, near graveyards, and in the filthy made land
of cities."
Anent the idea that the gases and organic matters
which arise from the graves rapidly undergo changes
by entering into new combinations when brought into
contact with the earth, Dr. John O. Marble, of Worces-
ter, Mass., says : —
" The monstrous delusion that the mere contact of
the corpse with fresh earth renders it innocuous, and
suffices for safe disinfection, is dissipated by overwhelm-
ing evidence. I distinctly remember my boyish scruples
concerning the water of a well situated not fifty yards
from graves in the churchyard adjoining my father's
garden. This old ' God's acre ' I have a hundred times
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 107
passed, in my timid boyhood, in the shades of night,
with palpitating heart, and a pace rivalled only by that
of Tarn O' Shanter's steed from witch-haunted Kirk
Alio way to the ' Keystone ' of the i Brig o' Doom' My
father overcame my scruples concerning the water by
stating the belief then held, that the earth was a puri-
fier and a safe depurator, and that no harm could come
to that well, 30 feet deep, the pride and unfailing
source of supply of the neighborhood. Yet I, that same
autumn, suffered a severe and nearly fatal attack of
typhoid fever, and another member of the family was
similarly affected a year later. The fever occurred when
the well was low, and I have no doubt, in the light of
present knowledge of such clangers, that, repulsive as is
the thought, I drank water filtered through the bones
of my revered ancestors buried there, and that the pol-
luted water caused that illness. To those who criticise
the advocates of cremation for quoting ancient exam-
ples only, of harm from graves, this instance will appear
sufficiently recent and intimate."
Opponents of incineration, who lay great stress upon
the disinfecting powers of the earth, forget that the soil
is easily saturated by the emanations from the dead.
Professor Presscott, of the University of Michigan, says
in regard to this matter : —
" The purifying power of ground, like that of the air
above it, is limited and easily overcharged. If ground-
air be loaded with more putrescent vapor than it can
oxidize, then poison is carried through the porous earth."
Dr. William Porter, of St. Louis, Mo., has recorded
the following case : —
"A young man died suddenly from diphtheria, and
was buried in the village churchyard. At some little
108 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
distance was a well, from which the good church-goers
drank freely each Sunday. Finally the water of the
well became foetid, for the supply was infiltrated by the
horrible decomposition from this, the nearest grave.
Was it not suggestive that 20 from that congregation
died from diphtheria while this impure well was in use ?
These people lived in mountain homes, in a pure atmos-
phere, and though many of these cases were isolated, —
far removed from others, — yet in all the disease was
alike virulent and deadly."
Churchyard emanations can penetrate almost any-
thing; they have a remarkable force. The chairman
and superintendent of sewers of Holborn and Finsbury
division, London, claimed that putrid matter from ceme-
teries over 30 feet distant had penetrated the cement
and brick of his drain.
Several years ago, when Mr. Holland, the English
government inspector of burial-grounds, investigated
the state of Tooting Cemetery, it transpired that the
drainage provided for the burial-ground was insufficient ;
there was merely a system of surface drainage. In one
case (admitted by the cemetery board) a coffin was
placed in a grave that contained enough water to cover
the head of it. The entire drainage of the burial-ground
was conducted into a ditch near by, which ended in the
river Wandle, from which the inhabitants obtained their
drinking-water.
Lefort (in a monograph to the Paris Academy of
Sciences) points to the possibility of well-contamination
by neighboring cemeteries. In one instance he de-
tected, by chemical analysis, that a well was polluted
by a burial-ground 50 metres distant.
The Parisian scientist M. Duchamp detected a spring
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION.
109
110 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
that percolated entirely through graveyards, picking up
organic matter on the way, and that tasted very strongly.
Not a few analyses of water tainted by graveyard
emanations testify to the fact that it is harmful, nay,
that it is extremely dangerous, to those who consume it.
Nor is the danger always apparent. In 1874 the Broad
Street pump at London, England, carried cholera to
those who drank its water ; yet the latter looked clean,
had no perceptible taste, and was odorless.
' ' The very witching time of night
When graveyards yawn, and hell itself breathes out
Contagion on this world."
— Shakespeare.
To the question, " Can an epidemic of any kind be
caused by graveyard emanations?" there is but one
reply ; the facts on record compel us to answer in the
affirmative.
Dr. Buck, in his excellent work on Hygiene, writes :
"It is impossible for any one to say how long the
materies morbi may continue to live underground. If
organic matter can be boiled and frozen without losing
its vitality, and seeds 3000 years old will sprout when
planted, it would be hardihood to assert that the poison
of cholera, or small-pox, or typhus may not for years lie
dormant, but not dead, in the moist temperature of the
grave."
Dr. Wheelhouse, of Leeds, England, says : " Do we
not shun, and that most wisely, the presence of those
afflicted with infectious diseases as long as they remain
amongst us ; and yet, no sooner are they removed by
death than we are content, with tender sympathy in-
deed, and most loving care, it is true (but with how
much wisdom?) to lay them in the ground, that they
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. Ill
may slowly dissipate their terribly infections gases
through the soil, and saturating that, may thereby re-
charge the rains of heaven as they filter through it,
with all their virulence and terrible power of reproduc-
tion in the systems of the living. I am not the thorough
and entire believer in the disinfecting and depurating
power of the soil that I once was, for terrible examples
of its failure have, in my judgment, come under my
notice."
Often the site of an old grave is used to make a new
one, and in consequence earth is brought to light that
is saturated with the effluvia of corpses of those who,
perhaps, have died of some contagious or infectious
disease. The crime that is committed by individuals
when they bury persons deceased of such maladies is
pithily expressed by that champion of modern crema-
tion, Sir Henry Thompson, who says : " Is it not indeed
a social sin of no small magnitude to sow the seeds of
disease and death broadcast, caring only to be certain
that they cannot do much harm to our own generation ? "
But such is selfish human nature !
The first to show the connection between epidemics and
the process of decomposition was Professor Pettenkofer,
of Munich, Bavaria. He demonstrated that the presence
of putrefying organic bodies, air, moisture, and warmth,
in a porous soil, are the potent factors which originate
and develop pestilential germs.
The great mortality, the severity, that attended in
former times the appearance of epidemics in cities
where graveyards were situated in the center of a large
population, illustrates the deadly influence which these
" God's acres " have.
112 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Saint Augustine pointed to the fact that epidemics
are caused by decomposing organic bodies.
Forestus reported many cases of malignant fever
caused by the emanations of cadavers.
Ambrose Pare, the renowned French surgeon, in
1562 demonstrated that a malignant (pestilential) fe-
ver, then raging in L'Agenois, was due to the putrid
vapors arising from a neighboring well into which
many dead bodies, soldiers fallen in battle, had been
thrown.
Raulin (Observ. de Med.) relates how the section of
a corpse at Leicturm, in the plain of Armagnac, caused
a frightful epidemic.
A terrible pestilence, which decimated especially the
lower classes, was originated in Riorno (Auvergne) by
the digging up of the ground of an old cemetery, done
to beautify the city.
Jean Wolf, who reported upon an epidemic of malig-
nant fever in 1731, attributed it to putrefying animal
remains.
In 1752 a man who had died of small-pox 30 years
ago was dug up in Chelwood, a village near London,
England. He had been buried in an oaken coffin which,
when taken iip, was yet entire and could have been so
removed from the grave. But because the grave-digger
could not handle it properly he got impatient and beat
in the cover of the casket with his spade, whereupon
immediately a mephitic smell arose that filled the air to
some distance. The corpse, which was to be deposited
in a vault, had been a person of consequence, and there-
fore not only the inhabitants of his native village at-
tended the exhumation, but a good many people
from neighboring places. But a few days after 14
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 113
persons contracted small-pox, and within a short time
the entire village was infected, only two individuals
enjoying immunity because they had had the disease.
Although the epidemic was of a light character, two
persons died of it. All those in the surrounding vil-
lages who had been at the exhumation were also attacked
by small-pox.
Riecke adduces analogous cases, and relates that the
opening of a vault which contained a victim of small-
pox was followed by the death of a workman and the
infection of another person.
Maret is authority for the following statement : A
fever, complicated by gastric and catarrhal disorders,
was prevalent in 1773 at Saulieu, Burgundy ; but few
of those it attacked died. This was in the latter part
of February. On the 3d of March, a corpulent body, a
victim of the disease, was buried in the cathedral, and
on the 20th of April following, very near to the first,
that of a woman who, in child-bed, had succumbed to
the fever. Maret reports that when the coffin was low-
ered into the vault, the ropes slipped from the grasp of
the men who held them ; the coffin fell to the ground
and broke ; a putrid fluid, that filled the church with a
most nauseating odor, oozed from it. Of 170 persons
who remained in the church from the time that the grave
was opened until the conclusion of the ceremony, 149
were attacked by a malignant putrid fever, which, bear-
ing many of the characteristics of the prevalent fever,
was undoubtedly the result of the vitiation of the
church.
The city of Tacna, Peru, was yearly visited at certain
times by a pernicious fever, which caused many deaths.
The cemetery was in the center of the city. Finally,
114 CEEMATION OF THE DEAD.
the dead were buried outside of the city limits, and the
fever disappeared.
During the month of March, 1781, and the half-year
preceding it, an epidemic raged at Pasajes, Spain, which
befell 127 persons, of which number 83 died. This epi-
demic was attributed to the poisonous vapors arising
from the overcrowded vaults of the parish church.
Trousseau mentions the case of a grave-digger who
was attacked b}^ small-pox soon after opening the grave
of an individual who had died of that malady many
years ago.
Mr. Cooper charged an outbreak of small-pox in
Eyam, Derbyshire, Eng., to the excavation of an old
cemetery.
A dispatch from Montreal, dated Oct. 26, 1885, states
that a grave-digger of St. Sulpice, named Robitaille,
made a grave next to where a man who died from
small-pox a month ago was buried. At the time there
was no small-pox in the village; but Robitaille, some
days after digging the grave, sickened and finally died
of small-pox, making it evident that he contracted the
disease from the body of a man who had been buried
for a month.
Recent scientific discoveries confirm the opinion long
held by persons endowed with common sense that the
germs of many infectious and contagious diseases retain
their vitality and the power to spread the respective
malady in the grave and the layers of earth surrounding
it. By means of these germs, yellow fever, cholera,
small-pox, splenic fever, scarlet fever, diphtheria, and
other diseases belonging to the same category, can be
communicated from the dead to the living, even years
after burial. Concerning splenic fever, which can be
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 115
transmitted from animal to man, the great French in-
vestigator and pathologist, Louis Pasteur, says : —
" Recently, we discovered the characteristic germs
in pits in which animals dead of splenic fever (charbon)
had been buried for 12 years ; and their culture was
as virulent as that from the blood of an animal recently
dead. Anthracoid germs in the earth of pits in which
animals have been buried are brought to the surface
by earthworms; and in this fact we may find the whole
etiology of the disease, inasmuch as the animals swallow
these germs with their food."
The British Medical Journal in 1880 commented on
Pasteur's great discovery as follows : —
" Pasteur's recent researches on the etiology of 4 char-
bon ' shows that this earth-mould positively contains the
specific germs which propagate the disease, and that
the same specific germs are found within the intestines
of the worms. The parasitic organism, or bacteridium,
which, inoculated from a diseased to a healthy animal,
propagates the specific disease, may be destroyed by
putrefaction after burial. But before this process has
been completed, germs or spores may have been formed
which will resist the putrefactive process for many
years, and lie in a condition of latent life, like a grain
of corn, or any flower-seed, ready to germinate and com-
municate the specific disease. In a field in the Jura,
where a diseased cow had been buried two years be-
fore at a depth of nearly seven feet, the surface earth
not having been disturbed in the interval, Pasteur
found that the mould contained germs which, intro-
duced by inoculation into a guinea-pig, produced char-
bon and death. Further, if a worm be taken from an
infected spot, the earth in the alimentary canal of the
116
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
worm contains these spores or germs of charbon, which,
inoculated, propagate the disease ; and the mould de-
posited on the surface by the worm, when dried into
dust, is blown over the grass and plants on which the
cattle feed, and
may thus spread
the disease. Af-
ter various farm-
ing operations
of tilling and
harvest, Pasteur
URNACE OF THE BUFFALO CREMA-
TORIUM. (Venini system.)
has found the germs just over the
graves of the diseased cattle, but not
to any great distance. After rains or
morning dews the germs of charbon,
with a quantity of other germs, were
found about the neighboring plants;
and Pasteur says that in cemeteries it is very pos-
sible that germs capable of propagating specific dis-
eases of different kinds quite harmless to the earthworm
may be carried to the surface of the soil, ready to
cause disease in the proper animals. The practical
inferences in favor of cremation are so strong that, in
Pasteur's words, they 'need not be enforced.' ':
Sir T. Spencer Wells pointed out, in his paper read
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 117
before the British Medical Association, in August, 1880,
that the observations of Darwin, " on the formation of
mould," made more than 40 years ago, when he was
a young man, are curiously confirmatory of the conclu-
sions of Pasteur. In Darwin's paper, read at the Geo-
logical Society of London, in 1837, he proved that, in
old pasture-land, every particle of the superficial layer
of earth, overlying different kinds of subsoil, has passed
through the intestines of earthworms. The worms
swallowed earthy matter, and, after separating the di-
gestible or serviceable portion, they eject the remainder
in little coils or heaps at the mouths of their burrows.
In dry weather the worm descends to a considerable
depth, and brings up to the surface the particles which
it ejects. This agency of earthworms is not so trivial
as it might appear. By observation in different fields,
Mr. Darwin proved, in one case, that a depth of more
than three inches of this worm-mould had been accumu-
lated in 15 years ; and, in another, that the earthworms
had covered a bed of marl with their mould, in 18
years, to an average depth of 13 inches.
Professor Klebs, of Prague, Bohemia, discovered the
bacteria of malarial fever. They were called by him
bacilli malarice. His discovery was verified by Prof.
Tomassi Crudelli, of Rome, Italy.
Dr. Robert Koch, of the Imperial Sanitary Bureau at
Berlin, Germany, detected the bacillus tuberculosis;
there is no doubt, to my mind, but that consumption
can possibly be spread by the upturning of the soil of a
grave containing the victim of tuberculosis.
The same gentleman, now professor in Berlin Univer-
sity, discovered the comma bacillus of cholera. He
118 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
expressed his belief in its propagation in the grave,
especially when the latter is moist.
Houlier and Feruel are responsible for the statement
that, during the prevalence of the plague in Paris in
the beginning of the 18th century, the disease lingered
longest and was the most severe in the vicinity of the
" cimetiere de la Trinite."
The Detroit Evening News, of Sept. 23, 1886, reports
the following case in which diphtheria was contracted
from a corpse : —
" Blanche Hunt, a 12-year old girl, died at Albion of
malignant diphtheria last week. Sophie Calkins, aged
13, died at Fair Haven, Vt., of the same disease, con-
tracted the week before at Albion. There are no other
cases in town, and these two girls are supposed to have
taken the disease at the cemetery, where they went into
the vault containing the remains of a woman sent there
from abroad, who had died from what the physicians
called black jaundice. It is believed her disease was
really diphtheria."
As early as 1878, the Massachusetts State Board of
Health — one of the best in the world — showed that
diphtheria is originated and diffused by the emanations
of victims of that disease.
In 1875 the same high authority had reached similar
conclusions regarding typhoid fever.
There is much evidence to show that cholera was
repeatedly caused by the excavation of the graves of
those who had died of the disease, and that it raged with
special violence in the vicinity of cemeteries.
Dr. Sutherland attested the fact that cholera was
unusually prevalent in the immediate neighborhood of
London graveyards. This, however, need not astonish
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 119
us, when we consider that the soil of churchyards in
some of the poorer districts in London was raised two,
three, or even four feet in a few years. The great prev-
alence of epidemic diseases in some parts of the city
finally led to the formation of the Epidemiological
Society of London, under the presidency of Dr. Babing-
ton.
When the cholera visited London in 1854, Mr. Simon
asserted that if the soil of the cemeteries in which the
plague-stricken of 1665 were buried would be upturned,
it would make the prevailing scourge more virulent. It
was done in spite of his warning, and his prediction was
verified.
In 1826, when cholera made its appearance in Egypt,
the French government sent out medical officers to dis-
cover, if possible, its origin. It was traced to an old
and disused cemetery at Kelioub, a village near Cairo.
The outbreak of cholera at Modena, Italy, in 1828,
was shown by Professor Bianchi to be due to the up-
turning of the ground of burial-yards in which victims
of the plague had been inhumed 300 years before.
Nov. 12, 1836, Miaulis, the adjutant of Otto the First,
of Greece, was attacked by cholera, of which he finally
died. The body was given in charge of three men, who
also assisted at the post-mortem examination. On the
third day after the funeral of the adjutant, one of the
men, Jacob Kuehnlein, 72 years of age, was taken ill,
and died the following day. The autopsy proved the
disease to be Asiatic cholera. Three days after Kuehn-
lein's burial, the second of the men who had guarded
Miaulis' remains, J. Stroehlein by name, aged 48, was
stricken down by the cholera, to which he succumbed
within two days.
120 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Schauenburg (Cholera, etc., Wuerzburg, 1874, p. 8)
gives it as his opinion that decomposition is favorable
to the development of cholera germs, which means the
propagation of the comma bacillus.
The Italians do not only stand at the head of the
cremation movement to-day, but they recognized the
value of that sure and never-failing germicide — fire —
as early as 1837 ; in that year thousands of the victims
of the cholera epidemic, then raging in Italy, were
burned on the seashore at Palermo.
The report of the London Board of Health for 1849
directs attention to the fact that the cholera was espe-
cially prevalent and fatal in the neighborhood of grave-
yards. This, however, need not cause any surprise,
as the London Athenceum, to this day one of the most
reliable journals of the United Kingdom, states in 1850
that, during the prevalence of the scourge, 500 bodies,
dead of cholera, were daily interred, in addition to
those of other diseases.
Professor Jaccoud, of the faculty of medicine of the
University of Paris, claims, in his " Pathologie Interne, "
that there are three wa}^s of transmission of cholera, of
which the third is by corpses.
An employee of the French marine hospital at
Therapia, near Constantinople, was present at the
autopsy of Marshal Saint Armand, who had died of
cholera, which was held in the amphitheatre of the in-
stitution. A few days after the man succumbed to a
severe attack of de cholera foudroyant, which he had
contracted at the post-mortem examination.
Dr. F. Bidlot, of Liege, Belgium, states that, in 1867,
he was called to a robust cholera patient who, when
asked about the cause of his illness, said that until
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 121
noon he had worked at the grave of a person, dead of
cholera, who had been buried very superficially, since
an exhumation was to take place : when the body was
disinterred, he was seized by an illness which soon
proved to be cholera.
The following case was also reported by Dr. Bidlot.
A nun who had nursed cholera patients in a hospital
died of the dread disease in the summer of 1860. At
10 A.M. in the latter part of October she was ex-
humed. At four o'clock in the forenoon of the same
day Dr. Bidlot was called to Dr. Romiee, who had at-
tended the disinterment. He was found to be suffering
from cholera, and declared that his illness was owing to
his exposure to the emanations of the body dug up.
Trinity Church graveyard, at New York, was the
center of very fatal prevalence of cholera at every visit
of that pest from 1832 to 1854.
Dr. Rauch relates (Intra-Mural Interments in Popu-
lous Cities, Chicago, 1868) how the cholera was spread
in Burlington, la., in 1850. Not a single death took
place in the vicinity of the cemetery of the city, until
20 persons, deceased of cholera, had been interred
therein ; then one case after another occurred, till the
epidemic became truly alarming.
In 1865, when a cholera epidemic invaded Paris,
France, it raged with great virulence in the old quarter
of Montmartre ; in that part of the metropolis there
w^as a vast burial-ground, from which toxic vapors were
continually escaping. Of 5000 victims of the epidemic,
1800 belonged to this ancient community. The great
mortality in this quarter of the city was no doubt due
to the presence of the over-crowded cemetery.
Dr. John Murray, inspector-general of hospitals in
122 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Bengal, India, wrote a book, in which he endeavored
to determine whether or not cholera can be propagated
by human remains. He declares emphatically (Propaga-
tion of Cholera, 1873, p. 216), that the body of a cholera
patient, dead or alive, must be regarded as an agent of
transmission of the disease; and adduces the sequent
facts to prove his assertion. Several women, whose
business it was to lay out corpses, had contracted chol-
era. In 1818 a man died of the dread disease ; five fel-
low-men, who carried his body to the last resting-place,
were taken down with cholera, and died in the night
after the burial. Dr. Townsend reported that, in 1869,
three men were commissioned by the police to carry a
corpse to Dumwahi. The day following their arrival the
cholera appeared in this city, and the first to die of the
scourge were the three who had borne the corpse.
Cholera from time to time threatens to invade our
peaceful land. When it comes, shall we, in view of what
has just been shown, bury its victims, saturate the earth
with its specific germs, which, if the grave should ever
be disturbed, may breed a terrible pestilence, if not
during our lifetime, yet surely during that of our de-
scendants ? There can be but one answer : To secure
ourselves against a repetition of epidemics, we must
burn our dead ; it is a duty that cannot be evaded, that
we owe to all mankind, that, when sinned against, as it
has been in the past, is revenged by the resulting visi-
tation.
When the cases above related are taken into consid-
eration, even the most vehement anti-cremationist can-
not deny that the specific germs of infectious and con-
tagious diseases are propagated by earth-burial, and
that the only sure medium for their destruction is fire,
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION.
123
for no disease germ can pass through the rosy heat of
the crematory and survive to propagate its species.
The scientific world was lately startled by the glad-
some news that Dr. Domingo Freire, a physician of
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, had discovered the peculiar
FURNACE OF THE CINCINNATI CREMATORIUM. fDesigned by M. R.Conway.)
microbe of yellow fever. The blood of yellow fever
patients swarms with these microbes (cryptococci), which,
by inoculation, produce the disease in animals. Dr.
Freire named the microbe cryptococcus xanthogenicus.
He was aided in his labors, to detect the specific germ
124 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
of yellow fever, which included microscopic and spec-
troscopic examinations as well as experiments on ani-
mals, by his able assistant, Senor Menezes Doria.
Dr. Freire also examined some soil from the cemetery
of Jurujuba, where victims of the yellow jack (as we
call this fever sometimes) lie interred. Some of this
earth was dried and then placed in a cage which con-
tained a guinea pig. Previously to the introduction of
the earth, the blood of the animal was examined micro-
scopically, and found to contain no bacteria of any
kind. The animal became ill, and died within five
days. When its tissues were examined after death,
they were found to present all the characteristic changes
which yellow fever brings about. The blood was full
of cryptococci xanthogenici in various degrees of de-
velopment. The urine was highly albuminous. The
brain and the intestines were stained yellow by the in-
filtration of the coloring matter of the cryptococci.
After this discovery, the doctor recommended that all
victims of yellow fever be destroyed by fire, to prevent
general infection. The Brazilian government (one of
the most enlightened in the world) immediately or-
dered that a cremation furnace be built at Jurujuba, in
which all those that die of yellow fever there must be
incinerated.
The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal makes
this very sensible suggestion regarding the disposition
of the remains of those dying of yellow fever in our
own United States. It says : —
" From what we have learned from private sources,
the resurrection of the bodies, during the winter months,
of those who died of yellow fever, has done much to
perpetuate this terrible disease in southern cities, until
SAN1TAEY ASPECT OE INCINERATION. 125
the warm weather has set in. Cremation obviates all
possible harm that can come from the dead, and duty
to the living demands that everything be done to de-
stroy the possibilit}^ of propagating this and all conta-
gious diseases that run so malignant a course."
Dr. J. F. A. Adams says : —
" Dr. Joseph Akerly expressed the belief that Trinity
Churchyard had been an active cause of the yellow
fever in New York in 1822, aggravating the malignity
of the epidemic in its vicinity. This church was built
in 1698, and the ground had been receiving the dead
for 124 years. Sometimes bodies were buried only 18
inches below the surface, and it was impossible to dig
without disturbing the remains. During the Revolu-
tionary War, this burial-ground had emitted pestilential
odors, and in 1781 Hessian soldiers were employed to
cover the ground with a layer of earth two or three
feet in depth. The ground was unusually offensive in
1782, and annoyed passengers on the surrounding streets
previous to the appearance of the yellow fever in July.
During the epidemic, the condition of this churchyard,
and the virulence of the disease in its vicinity, called for
some active measures, and on the night of Sept. 22
Dr. Roosa covered the ground with 52 casks of quick-
lime, the stench being at the time so excessive as to
cause several laborers to vomit. On the 25th and 26th
of the same month St. Paul's Churchyard, and the
vaults of the North Dutch Church in William Street,
received the same treatment, these being likewise very
offensive and foci of epidemics."
When the yellow fever raged in New Orleans in 1853,
the death-rate in the Fourth District (in which there
126 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
were three large burial-grounds) was 452 per 1000 of
the population.
Dr. Bryant, writing on yellow fever at Norfolk in
1855, regards cemeteries as a constant source of danger
in an epidemic, and urges the total forbidding of intra-
mural or even near-by suburban cemeteries.
Sir Spencer Wells related a fact recently at a meeting
of the Health Exhibition in London, England, which
has a strong bearing on the source of epidemics and
their annihilation by cremation. Some persons who
had died of scarlet fever were interred in a country
graveyard. Thirty years afterward the cemetery was
included in a neighboring garden, and the old graves
dug up. Scarlet fever forthwith broke out in the rec-
tory and parish, and no other probable source having
been discovered, it is impossible to avoid the inference
that the germs of scarlatinal infection can retain their
vitality a third of a century.
In epidemics individuals should be forced to allow
their dead (unless they succumb to some disease other
than the prevailing scourge) to be cremated. To stamp
out a contagious or infectious malady, or to arrest its
progress, incineration must be made general ; its bene-
fits are nil when confined to isolated cases. The indi-
vidual must stand back when the public health is in
jeopardy.
Governments should not allow bodies to be intro-
duced into their respective countries from an infected
land, unless such bodies have been previously reduced
to ashes.
Thousands of cases of malignant sickness, I have no
doubt, could be prevented by the prompt introduction
of cremation. Why not, then, introduce it? Simply
SANITARY ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 127
because there is au unreasonable prejudice against tlie
custom? It is ridiculous ! Should any mere prejudice
stand in the way of a sanitary reform ? I leave it to
any sound mind to decide the question. I am not
advocating obligatory incineration in times of peace
except in cases of infectious and contagious disease. I
would rejoice to see it generally introduced, but not by
force. Cremation, moreover, needs not the aid of the
sword or law ; it will find its way unassisted.
Besides human and animal remains, I think all gar-
bage should be destroyed by fire.
The idea of cremation which, carried by the wings of
enthusiasm, traversed the whole civilized world in the
spring of 1874, is really naught but a demand of hygiene
in favor of our own health. Not only physicians, but
also laymen, should enter the arena where the great
fight between earth-burial and cremation is going on,
and combat for glorious incineration.
The International Medical Congress which convened
at Florence, Italy, in 1869 examined into the various
methods of burial, and concluded by expressing its
belief that cremation was necessary, and should be
adopted in the interest of civilization and public
health.
Dr. C. W. Purdy, of Chicago, 111., says: "Burial-
grounds are unquestionably ruinous to health, as both
theory and facts amply demonstrate ; many sections of
population suffer annually disease and death which are
exposed to their influences; all engaged in this unwhole-
some system suffer — the grave-diggers, the gardeners,
the men who repair the vaults and tombstones, the
friends who visit the graves, and the whole funeral pro-
cession are exposed directly. There is no redeeming
128 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
feature about this burial system, degrading to the dead
and dangerous to the living."
The celebrated medical author, Moleschott, even
more vehemently condemns cemeteries. He claims
that they emit a vapor which causes malignant fevers,
and concludes his remarks by calling them "workshops
and factories of the devil."
Beyond a doubt, cremation soonest places the bodies
of the dead in a condition where they can do the least
harm to the living. Incineration destroys all disease
germs and at once removes all possibility of the con-
tamination of air and water by the dead.
Then why not introduce cremation and do away with
all the evils described in this chapter? It is of no con-
sequence to the dead, whether they rot in the earth and
originate miasma, or are transformed by fire into pure
white ashes. They feel as little of the process of decay
as they do of the flame ; their eye is surrounded by the
same darkness, whether they are down in the deep
grave or in the glowing light of the crematory furnace.
But it is of the greatest consequence to us, the living ;
and the only way to protect ourselves from poisonous
infection by our dead is to burn them.
CHAPTER III.
CREMATION IN TIMES OF WAR.
A FTER a battle is over, the field of carnage is cov-
-^-*- ered with the dead. I think it cannot be ques-
tioned that these are disposed of in a very careless
manner in time of war ; not only those who have been
killed during an engagement, but also those who suc-
cumb to disease. After a great combat the slain are
usually hastily interred in large trenches, in which they
are arranged in tiers, or piled pell-mell upon each other,
whereupon they are left to decompose. That no more
calamity and sickness results from such a mode of
burial, than is usually the case, is due, I believe, princi-
pally to the fact that great battles are generally fought
on fields far from the habitations of man.
War, God knows, is bad enough, but far worse are
the diseases that follow in its wake. The dead on the
u field of honor," which is soon naught but a vast ceme-
tery, are, as I have said above, inhumed as rapidly as
possible. There is no time to lose. Hurriedly thou-
sands of fallen braves are thrown into large pits, and
barely covered with earth. The comrades who have
rendered them this last service move onward to bury
others, and leave them to vitiate the air and to form a
terrible herd of infection. Thus it is that a country
which has already been devastated by war is again
brought to the verge of despair by the appearance of
130
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
typhus fever, dysentery, and other equally serious mal-
adies. Unfortunately, these diseases do not confine
themselves to the country in which the war has been
waged, but also invade the lands of the peaceful neigh-
bors.
CREMATION IN TIMES OF WAR. 131
There is much evidence to prove that what I say is
true. Immediately after the defeat of Darius, Alexan-
der the Great was advised by the sage Aristoteles to
leave Arbela, to secure himself and his army from the
pestilential emanations of the dead.
When Syracuse was besieged by Hannibal, he decided
to wound the feelings of the Syracusans by desecrat-
ing their dead, who had been buried, as was the custom
in most ancient cities, outside of the city gates. He
ordered his troops to dig up the ill-fated corpses, cut
them to pieces, and strew them all over the field of
battle, in full sight of their horror-stricken relatives
and friends. But this barbarous act was followed by
deserved punishment. Pestilence decimated the be-
leaguerers, and scores upon scores of the soldiers fell
victims to the fatal power that arose, slow but sure,
from the outraged dead.
Lucan has furnished us with an account of the terri-
ble scourge that befell the army of Pompey at Durazzo,
because it had neglected to bury the cadavers of the
horses killed in the battle. For the same reason the
camp of Constantine the Great was once devastated by
the plague.
Mr. William Eassie, the honorary secretary of the
Cremation Society of England, states (vide his " Crema-
tion of the Dead," page 19) : —
"With the ancient Athenians, when soldiers fell in
battle, it was the custom to collect them into tents,
where they lay for a few days, to ensure recognition.
Each tribe then conveyed their dead in cypress shells to
the ceramicos, or places of public burning, an empty
hearse following behind, in memory of the missing."
The first epidemic of spotted fever on record occurred
132 CRExMATION OF THE DEAD.
in Spain, in 1490, and was due to the emanations aris-
ing from the decaying bodies which had been left un-
buried on the battle-ground.
In 1796 (according to Desgenettes), 'a military sur-
geon by the name of Vaidy supervised the burial of the
soldiers and horses that had been killed in a combat
near Nuremberg. While the work was in progress, he
was attacked by colic and nausea, and afterwards suf-
fered for several days from a severe dysentery. His
horse, after having been tortured by severe abdominal
pains, died on the evening of the day when he was taken
sick. Persons who were with Vaidy complained of the
same symptoms as he.
During the campaign in Russia in 1812 many of the
French soldiers who perished in the disastrous retreat
were burned by the enemy.
After the battle of Waterloo 4000 bodies were reduced
to ashes on funeral piles of resinous wood on the field
of carnage.
The ravages of the typhus fever in the armies battling
during the Crimean War are yet well remembered, and
were too great to be easily forgotten.
An eye-witness (Trusen) of the siege of Sebastopol
reported at the time that : " Those who were but lately
our brave soldiers have become greater enemies of
their successors in arms than the Russians themselves.
Barely, and sometimes not at all, covered by earth, their
bodies emit a pestilential miasma, which kills far better
than powder and bullet, and is more reliable than a gun.
A bishop has been sent out to consecrate the trenches
in which the dead are piled up, yet the infection will
resist consecration and holy water. Unfortunately, the
danger does not come from our own troops alone. The
CREMATION IN TIMES OF WAR. 133
wind carries the emanations of the Russian dead into
oar intrenchments. We besiege Sebastopol, bat pesti-
lence besieges us. The same Frenchmen who came to
our rescue with their sabres now poison us by their
putrefaction. Animal remains also vitiate the air. The
cadaver of the noble battle-horse that carried its rider
bravely through the day of Balaklava now lies in the
road, and threatens the victorious dragoon who rode
upon it with an inevitable fate. Burial-ground and
camp adjoin each other. Where the soldier fought and
fell is his grave, which is seldom far from the tents of
the surviving."
During the expedition to Morea, the French made
intrenchments in a cemetery outside of Patras. All
those who were ordered into the treuches experienced
first malarial symptoms, and were finally attacked by
typhoid fever.
The cholera mowed down more soldiers in the war
between Austria and Prussia, in 1866, than the missiles
of either army.
The Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71 was accompanied
by dysentery and typhus fever. After the battle of
Gravelotte the German troops had to camp for weeks
upon the graves of their comrades, subjected all the
time to the most dangerous efflavia from the slain. The
bodies of those that fell at Metz were in many instances
dug up by the Germans and re-interred ; since the hasty
and superficial way in which they had been buried in
the first place caused contamination of the water-
courses near by, and pollution of the air.
The evils of earth burial were especially apparent in
besieged forts, for instance in Metz and Paris, 1870-71.
134 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
The communists at Paris evaded the evils of inhuma
tion by burning their dead in the casemates.
On July 14, 1877, during the war between Turkey
and Russia, General Tergankassoff informed his gov-
ernment at St. Petersburg, by despatch, that the air
in and about Bayazid was so contaminated by the
decomposition of the dead, that it would not only be
unwise, but also dangerous, to prolong the stay of the
troops there.
On August 24 of the same year, the naval cor-
respondent of the London Times stated that thousands
of soldiers who fell in the Shipka Pass were so super-
ficially inhumed that relics of the dead, such as arms
and knees, protruded from the earth-heaps.
On the 14th of September following, the correspond-
ent of the London Daily Telegraph declared that the
stenches of the villages around Hasankioe were unen-
durable; that the retreating invaders had cut off the
water-supply by filling up the wells with corpses ; and
that in consequence the water had to be brought from
a great distance. And on the seventeenth of the same
month, the Times correspondent reported that fever
had broken out at Kezanlik ; and that, within 600
yards of his tent, some hundreds of uninhumed dead
could be seen, relics of the battle which took place
some weeks previously. In order to lessen the danger,
the couriers passing along the Yemi Saghra road had
actually to ride with camphor in their mouths. This
state of things is not only deplorable, but pre-eminently
shameful.
It is plain from the above that interment en masse,
as it is practiced during war at the present time, is very
unsatisfactory, and often leads to disastrous conse-
CREMATION IN TIMES OF WAR. 135
quences. Unfortunately, burial in single graves is
impossible, for several reasons. In the first place, it
would take up too much time ; secondly, too much
room; and, thirdly, it would remove too many men
from the ranks of the combatants. Nothing remains to
us, therefore, but to look about us for some other mode
of disposing of the dead. The list of methods from
which we may select one is not very large. Various
schemes have been proposed. One erratic genius actu-
ally proposed to blow up the victims of human strife
with dynamite. Of all the ways of disposing of the
slain, none is so good and advantageous as cremation.
History records many instances in which cremation was
made use of to destroy the dead after a battle.
Mr. Wm. Eassie reports: "During the wars between
the English and the Burgundians and the French, —
the latter led by Joan of Arc, — the dead were on one
occasion piled up outside the city of Paris, and con-
sumed in one huge pyre."
Twelve days after the battle of Paris, on the 30th
of March, 1814, 4000 horses, killed during the combat,
were burnt by the Germans in the environs of Paris,
— the woods of Montfaucon.
In the battle at Rivas, Nicaragua, on the 28th of June,
1855, between government troops and Walker's Fili-
busters, the latter lost their commander, 12 officers,
and 100 men, all of whom were cremated.
Many dead were reduced to ashes by the Carlists,
after the battle of Cuenca.
More than 40,000 human and animal remains had
been inhumed in a very superficial manner after the
battle of Sedan, during the late Franco-Prussian War.
In consequence, the Belgian villages in the neighbor-
136 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
1 lood were visited by epidemics and infectious diseases.
The Belgian government was petitioned to remove the
evil. It despatched Colonel Creteur to examine into
the grievances, and, if possible, remove them. One's
hair stands on end when one reads the report of the
colonel on the condition of the Sedan battle-field. The
only way to remedy the evil was to destroy the danger-
ous cadavers by cremation, which was a difficult task,
under the circumstances, but which was nevertheless
accomplished by the ingenious Creteur. The colonel's
report is full of horrible facts. The bodies of German
soldiers in a trench at Laid-Trou were covered so little
by earth that carnivorous animals had already devoured
part of the hands and faces. Rain-water had caused
30 large pits, containing the remains of Bavarians,
to cave in, and had laid bare the bodies. Between
Belan and Bazailles, the owners of a field had leveled
the elevation of a Bavarian grave. Relics of the dead
protruded from the ground. The bodies were covered
only hj a thin layer of earth, in which corn flourished
luxuriantly. Wild bears, foxes, and dogs, relishing the
human flesh, helped to scratch awray the soil over the
remains, as did the numerous crows upon the pit in
which the horses had been buried. Dogs, having once
feasted on this fare, would not eat anything else. Cre-
teur at first could not obtain men to carry out his plans,
as every one who attempted to open the trenches con-
tracted phlyctgena, an eruption of the skin. Finally,
by promising good pay, he enlisted 27 workmen,
whom he endeavored to protect by saturating their
clothing and moistening the graves with a solution of
carbolic acid. But this only intensified the phlyc-
tsena. He then determined to cover the graves with a
THE MILAN CINERARIUM.
138 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
layer of chloride of lime, and to pour diluted muriatic
acid upon them subsequently. By this means he suc-
ceeded in laying bare the topmost layer of the corpses.
He then had large quantities of coal tar poured into the
pit, which trickled down among the bodies to the bot-
tom, thoroughly covering the remains. He then had
more chloride of lime heaped upon the corpses, and
finally had bundles of hay, previously saturated with
kerosene, thrown burning into the pit. Creteur declares
that from 200 to 300 bodies were consumed within
50 to 60 minutes. The smoke, impregnated with the
smell of the carbolic acid that was formed by the
combination of the chloride of lime and coal tar,
was not offensive, and proved entirely harmless to
the workmen. About one-fourth of all the contents
remained in the pits, consisting of calcined bones
and a dry mass. These were again covered with
chloride of lime, and then the trenches were closed.
In this way, 45,855 human and equine bodies were dis-
posed of.
Incineration in war-time should be obligatory — must
be so in fact. At present, cremation in portable fur-
naces is out of the question, because it would take too
long. Only the bodies of prominent officers might be
thus cremated and sent to the rear, so that they might
rest under a monument erected by the grateful people
of the country that they served. Under the existing
circumstances, I think Creteur 's method would be the
best. By this means, several hundred bodies could be
destroyed at once. There ought to be a cremation
corps in every division of an army. Better yet it would
be to organize a neutral society, like the Red Cross
Association, and call it the Society of the Black Cross.
CREMATION IN TIMES OF WAR. 139
The members might wear a black cross on their caps
and on the left arm. After a battle, the various corps
of this society would begin their work, gathering the
dead and committing them to the flames. Thus we
would protect our brave soldiers, who offer up their
lives for their beloved country and our sake, from
pestilence and disease.
CHAPTER IV.
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION.
TN beginning the consideration of the various processes
-*- of cremation, I ought to speak of the ancient pyre
first; but since it was fully described in a previous
chapter, I deem it best to dismiss it with this passing
notice. I will remark, however, that were the intro-
duction of cremation attempted with a view to the use
of this barbarous mode, that is, if there were no alter-
native but to burn the dead in the old-fashioned way,
I would not be the advocate of incineration; for the
method of antiquity was not only obnoxious to the
senses, but almost as dangerous to the living as burial
in the earth.
It would take up too much space and would, more-
over, be entirely useless to describe in detail the numer-
ous European cremation apparatuses, of which those of
Siemens, Brunetti, and Gorini are best known. The
trouble with these furnaces is, that (1) the apparatus
costs too much ; (2) the process of cremation, when they
are employed, is too expensive.
Therefore I will confine myself to a description of
the cremation furnaces used in America.
The crematory at Washington, Pa., is a small, plain,
brick building, containing but two rooms, — furnace
and reception room. The retort is exactly similar to
the ones used in making gas, and, indeed, the whole
process is the same.
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 141
The Washington crematory is one story high, 30
feet long, 20 feet wide. The reception room is 20
feet square, including walls, and the furnace room
20 feet by 10 feet, including walls. Cremation is
performed in a fire-clay cylinder or retort, called the
incinerator, which is three feet in diameter by seven
feet long, and the walls of which are from one to two
inches thick. The retort is like those used in the
manufacture of illuminating gas, but somewhat of a
different shape. It is heated to a red heat by a furnace
fire which is built underneath and kept burning for
20 or 30 hours before the cremation is to take place.
The body is placed in an iron crib made in the shape
of a coffin, with small, round rods, with feet three
or four inches long to keep it up off the bottom of the
retort. These feet are inserted into a flat strip of iron
two inches wide and a quarter inch thick, turned up at
the ends so that the crib with the body will slide into
the retort easily. In addition to the ordinary burial
garments, the body is covered with a cloth wet with a
saturated solution of sulphate of alum (common alum),
which even when burned, retains its form and prevents
any part of the corpse from being seen until the bony
skeleton begins to crumble down. The incinerator
receives to itself the intense heat of the fire below, but
does not admit the flames. The consequence is that
the corpse, when introduced into the retort, is not, in
a proper sense of the word, burned. It is reduced to
ashes by the chemical application of intense heat.
Gases are driven off or absorbed, and, being carried
down into the fire from the incinerator and led
back and forth 25 feet through its flames, are utterly
consumed. Even the smoke of the fire is consumed,
142 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
and nothing can be seen issuing from the chimney but
the quiver of the heat. The process might be called,
says an eye-witness of a cremation in this furnace, the
spiritualization of the body, the etherealization or sub-
limation of its material parts. The time required to
complete the operation is about two hours. A very
small portion of the remains is ashes, but the mass is in
the form of calcined bones in small fragments, very
white, odorless, entirely deprived of all animal matter,
and may be preserved any length of time without
change.
There are four to seven pounds of these remains from
various sized adult bodies, and can be placed for preser-
vation in a marble or terra-cotta urn, into which a
photograph of the deceased, with appropriate record,
can be placed before introducing the remains. This
urn can be placed in the columbarium of the crematory,
kept among the cherished memorials of the family of
the departed, or placed beside other remains previously
buried in cemeteries or graveyards.
Dr. Le Moyne favored placing the remains of the
dead in a one-gallon salt-mouthed druggist's bottle,
with a large ground stopper. After his death, however,
the bottle-urn idea proved impracticable, therefore the
ashes were generally placed in a sealed tin box.
The furnace erected at Lancaster, Pa., is on a new
system, which was devised by Dr. M. L. Davis. The
cost of the crematorium was about $5000. The build-
ing is beautifully located upon a bluff overlooking the
Conestoga River. The grounds occupy two and one-
half acres. The crematory is of gothic architecture,
48x32 feet, and contains four rooms, — the audience
room or chapel, toilet, reception, and furnace room.
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 143
The chapel is used for religious services, the toilet
room for the accommodation of relatives and friends
accompanying the body, the reception room to re-
ceive the body and prepare it for incineration ; all of
the apparatus is located in the furnace room, except
the retort doors, which face the auditorium. The firing
is done in the rear of the furnace, where all tools and
miscellaneous articles are kept. The floor of the audi-
torium is made of Portland cement ; the other parts
of the building are floored with brick. The audience
room is furnished with chairs and a table for the use of
ministers or the officers of societies having charge of
the ceremonies at cremation ; the walls are decorated
with pictures and urns of various designs. The waiting
or toilet room is provided with chairs, lounges, toilet-
stand, etc., for the comfort of the waiting friends. The
grounds consist of a plot of two acres, one-half of which
is level — here the building is located; the other is a
hillside of solid limestone rock — here the society in-
tends erecting columbaria at an early day. The
grounds around the building are beautified by road-
ways, walks, trees, shrubbery, etc.
The furnace invented by Dr. Davis is made of fire-
bricks and tiles. The outside dimensions are 10 ft. 6 in.
long, by 6 ft. 6 in. wide, with 9-in. walls of brick. The
furnace rests on a foundation 10 ft. 6 in. by 7 ft. 6 in. and
2 ft. 6 in. deep, of good building stone, with mortar of
sharp sand and quicklime or equally suitable material,
finished level with the floor of the building. At the
rear end the center is occupied by the fire chamber (F)
18 in. wide, 48 in. long, 3 ft. 9 in. high to arch, lined
with fire-brick 9 inches thick and roofed with an arched
fire-clay tile 4 in. thick, covered by 3-in. shield tile.
144 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
The iron doors (fire and ash) are furnished with frames,
the fire-door is protected by a lining of asbestos and
fire-clay; the grate-rest is 1 ft. 3 in. from the floor;
beneath the grate are two iron pipes (1| in.) at the
sides, to carry heated air to supply oxygen to the flues
(at O) ; a third iron pipe (f in.) passing to the rear of
the fire chamber and up through its back wall to the
retort (at P) ; a fourth pipe (3-in. diameter) leading
from the top of the rear end of the retort (at M) down
through the rear wall and opening in the ash chamber
under the grate-bars (at N), to carry off the surplus
gases not consumed in the retort. The air-supply pipes
are required to keep up rapid combustion by replacing
the oxygen already used, and so to equalize the heat at
both ends of the retort. The air-pipes leading into the
retort so assists the disintegration of the body in the
same way, supplying additional oxygen and making
oxidation more rapid. The retort is 9 ft. 9 in. long,
3 ft. wide, and 2 ft. high in the clear ; it is floored with
3-in. fire-clay tile in sections ; the sides are of 3-in tile,
also in sections ; the roof is of the same material arched
in sections. The retort is made in sections rather than
in one single piece, in order to make allowance at the
several joints for the great expansion and contraction
incident to a heat of 2000 to 2500 degrees, thus avoid-
ing the annoyance and expense of cracks and patching.
The retort is supported by the arched roof of the fire
chamber and its covering of shield tile, and back of the
fire chamber by fire-clay pillars, and at the sides by
projections of the tile partitions between the flues.
Six pairs of flues surround the retort, 15 and 13^ inches
wide respectively, and 3 in. deep, separated by tile par-
titions 3 in. thick. The gases from the fire chamber
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 145
enter the first pair through curved openings (QQ) and
pass up through AA down through BB (receiving
additional oxygen at O), and up again through CC,
and through the escape-flue S, into the chimney. The
outside facing of the flues is 3-in. tile. Between the
outside facing of the flues and the 9-in. brick wall is a
space of 3 inches which is packed with asbestos to pre-
vent radiation of heat and allow for lateral expansion
and contraction of the outer casing of the flues, giving
it much longer life. Above the fire space on the top of
the retort, which is 4 inches deep, is an arch of 9-in. fire-
brick, above which ashes and sand are filled in to the
depth of 6 inches above the top of the arch, and floored
over with red brick. The retort door is lined with as-
bestos and fire-clay ; it is made of steel plate, closing
against a flanged iron frame, and held to its place by a
spicier, upon which is screwed down an arm swinging
with the door and fastening to the frame ; the frame is
held to its place by two horizontal bars, walled in at the
ends. This arrangement secures a tight joint when the
door is closed; the stay-bars hold the frame, the bar holds
the door to the frame and gives the fulcrum for pressure
on the spider, while swinging with the door it is out of
the way when not in use. The whole structure is protect-
ed by three buckstays of T iron on each side, securely
joined by f-inch iron rods, furnished with nuts to allow
tightening or loosening when necessaiy. The fire-brick
escape-flue connects with the chimney ; the dimensions
are 16 X 14 inches in the clear ; the chimney rests on
sills of T iron, supported by brick pillars, and is lined
with fire-brick for 6 feet above the retort, and is carried
up to a total height of 30 feet.
I have given so minute a description of this ap-
146 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
paratus because it is an invention of which not only
Dr. M. L. Davis, but his countrymen with him, may feel
justly proud. It is the first cremation furnace that
possesses the two cardinal requirements of a good incin-
erator; namely, cheapness and usefulness. The price
of this apparatus is from 11200 to 11500 ; the Euro-
pean furnaces cost $3000 and more. The Davis fur-
nace, moreover, uses less fuel than the European
apparatus, whereby the expense of cremation is much
decreased. Ordinarily, coke and hard or "steamboat"
coal is used in this furnace, although (and this is an
additional advantage) gas, oil, or any other heating
material may be used. The quantity required varies
somewhat, but the average amount necessary to heat
the furnace and incinerate a body is 250 pounds of
coke and 250 pounds of coal, or about one-fourth ton
of fuel. The time occupied for complete incineration
varies according to the condition of the body, but
ranges from 45 minutes to one hour and a half. The
furnace can be heated in six hours, but usually more
time is occupied in heating, as there is less liability of
injury to the furnace by rapid expansion.
When the Davis furnace is used, the process is as
follows : The catafalque, bearing the crib which is cov-
ered with a cloth 15 feet long, wet with alum water, is
placed by the side of the casket containing the body,
the lid of which is removed and strips of muslin are
passed under it. The ends of the bands are attached
to an elevator, and the bod}^ is gently raised up and
placed upon the alum-sheet-covered crib, the free end
being covered over, thus entirely enveloping it. This
procedure is necessary to prevent the clothing in which
the corpse is dressed from igniting. All being in readi-
THE PEOCESSES OF MODERN CKEMATLON. 147
ness, the catafalque, on noiseless casters, is placed in
front of the retort. A cable is then attached to the
crib, the retort door is opened, a signal is given, and
the catafalque with its burden gently approaches the
open retort ; when near, it stops, and noiselessly the
corpse is moved into the retort, impelled, as it were, by
an unseen agency. When it is in the proper position,
a signal is given, the machinery in the rear and out of
sight stops, the door is closed air-tight, and the mechani-
cal process gives way to the chemical.
When the retort is opened, the cold air rushing in,
the cold body, crib, and alum-sheet chill for a few mo-
ments the inner surface of the retort; in a few moments
the retort regains its heat; a fine mist commences to
arise from the body, which gradually becomes thicker
and more dense, until the inside of the retort has the
appearance of dense white mist. The idea of fine snow
or fog is suggested. This appearance remains until the
soft tissues are reduced to ashes. Then the interior of
the retort gradually becomes more clear. The alum-
sheet will be seen to be in the same position as when
put in ; perhaps slightly sunken. A blue flame will be
seen arising through the sheet ; about six inches above
the body it becomes extinguished. This continues un-
til the bony structure is completely cremated, when all
is white as snow, and nothing can be seen inside the
retort, the ashes having fallen through the crib and
the alum-cloth collapsed. The oxygen by the intense
heat has been made to unite with the carbonaceous ele-
ments of the body, and the resulting carbonic acid gas,
ammonia, and water are driven off through the retort
walls into and through the flues to the air without,
where they mingle with the elements of nature. In the
148 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
retort are the ashes, consisting of pure oxide of
lime.
It is plain from the above that the corpse does not
come in contact with the flames, that is, the fire, in this
apparatus. There is no burning. The body is simply
oxidized, and the union of the oxygen and the organic
matter composing the body is so complete that what
nature has so perfectly formed in life appears to gently,
quietly melt away in death, and becomes resolved into
its original elements.
The record of the Davis furnace has been so far en-
tirely satisfactory. The Lancaster crematorium contains
two of these furnaces. This crematory has no smoke-
stack; that is, the chimney reaches but several inches
above the roof of the building.
On Nov. 23, 1885, Prof. T. R. Baker, Ph.D., of the
Millersville State Normal School, collected 30 jars of
gases from the escape-flue of the Lancaster cremato-
rium, with a view of analyzing them, to ascertain the
nature of the products of combustion of the human
body during incineration. Many persons have con-
tended that poisonous gases are given off, thereby pol-
luting the air ; and it was with a view of clearing up
this phase of the subject that the experiment was under-
taken. The apparatus used to collect the gases consisted
of an iron gas-pipe, five feet being bent two feet from
one end at right angles. The long end was passed
down the escape-flue from the furnace. To the other
end was attached a glass tube, which ran to a U-tube
surrounded with ice, to condense vapors. The gas was
collected in a jar. Fifteen jars were thus collected be-
fore the body was introduced into the retort, and 15
at various stages of the incineration. The body was
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 149
that of a man who had died from dropsy. Below will
be found Dr. Baker's report.
State Normal School,
Millersville, Pa., Dec. 7, 1885.
Dr. M. L. Davis : —
Dear Sir: I have completed the examination of the gaseous prod-
ucts recently obtained from the chimney of the Lancaster crema-
torium, and will now report the results of my investigation. The
escaping products were tested at the crematorium for water and
for gases readily soluble in water, and several bottles of these prod-
ucts were collected before the body was put in the retort, as well
as during the cremation.
Water, etc., were tested for by passing several gallons of the
escaping products through the U condension tubes, surrounded by
ice, and then through distilled water. The estimated amount of
water in the products escaping before the body was put in the retort
was .0011 of a cubic inch to the gallon, while during the cremation
it was .0044 of a cubic inch to a gallon.
The water through which the gases were passed, both that used
before the body was put in the retort and that used during the cre-
mation, had a distinct acid reaction, quickly reddening blue litmus
paper. I could not, however, detect any difference in the degree
of acidity of the wraters, and their reaction did not indicate that
the gases which had passed through them were more acid than the
gaseous products passing off from ordinary coal fires. The waters
were found to contain traces of the mineral acids generally found
in very small quantities in the products of the combustion of min-
eral coal. They gave no reaction for salts of ammonia, nor for
sulphuretted hydrogen.
The gases collected for laboratory examination were tested espe-
cially for carbonic acid (C02), illuminating gas, oxygen (O), car-
bonic oxide (CO), and nitrogen (N).
The method of examination employed was that generally followed
in gas analysis, namely, the absorption of the gases by liquid re-
agents. Carbonic acid was absorbed by potassium hydrate ; illumi-
nants by bromine ; oxygen by phosphorus ; and carbonic oxide by
cuprous chloride dissolved in hydrochloric acid.
The estimated amounts of the gases enumerated above are as
150
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
follows, the values indicating the parts of a cubic inch to the gal-
lon ; the estimated water being also included in the table : —
H20
co2
Illuminat-
ing Gas.
O
CO
N
Before Cremation,
During Cremation,
.001 1
.0044
.00080
.00091
.000
.012
.0080
.0065
.0000
.0017
.016
.015
It will be seen by a comparison of these results that the gaseous
products of ordinary coal combustion are modified to only an in-
considerable extent by matter passing through the walls of the cre-
mation retort. Illuminating gas is a variable mixture of hydrogen,
marsh gas, defiant gas, and other gases, and is entirely harmless
when produced in the small quantities indicated in the table, and so
thoroughly distributed through the air. That so much free oxygen
passes off with the escaping products is an indication of the thor-
oughness of the combustion, and the complete oxidation of the
oxidizable products.
In conclusion, I would say that not any of the many and various
tests, either at the crematorium or in my laboratory, of the products
under consideration, indicated the presence of anything that would
pollute the air. The burning of the body produces no material
difference in the gases escaping from the chimney. The volume of
the chimney products did not seem to be increased by the burning
of the body, and the products had precisely the same odor during
cremation that they had before the body was put in the retort.
I might add that I also made a test of the temperature of the
products issuing from the chimney, and found it to be about 300° F.
This is surprisingly low, considering the high temperature of the
retort (2500° to 2800° F.), and indicates a most excellently designed
furnace, utilizing as it does so large a percentage of the heat.
About one-fourth of the heat of boiler furnaces goes up the
chimney.
The process of cremation invented by Joseph Venini,
of Milan, Italy, is nsed in the crematorium of Buffalo,
N. Y. The process consists of two parts : first, the
generation of gas; and second, the cremation proper.
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 151
The apparatus is constructed with a gas generator (A),
which is a simple fire-pot about four feet in a vertical
measurement and two laterally, and is located in the
basement of the crematory. The air for combustion is
admitted through a grate in the bottom, and is not suf-
ficient to allow of the combustion of the entire mass of
small wood which is heaped on the fire. The result is
that the fire at the bottom distils the wood at the top,
and the gases of distillation and combustion of wood
are carried to the back end of the incinerating chamber
(B), which is on the main floor. Here these gases are
met by air heated in a chamber (C) outside of the fur-
nace, where the two are ignited by a fire (D) which is
kept burning just under their point of union. The
Bunsen flame (E) thus produced is thrown quite across
the incinerating chamber ; thence it is carried back
beneath the retort by the flue (F) into the basement to
a chimney, which is about 40 feet high, and so to the open
air. A certain amount of gas is also burned in the flue
(F) beneath the incinerating retort and also at the bot-
tom of the chimney. It will be seen from this descrip-
tion the Bunsen burners play directly upon the subject,
and by their heat liberate the gases of the body, which
gases, being burned in the retort, are carried into the
flue beneath ; here another Bunsen flame (H) ignites
such combustible material as has not been consumed in
the retort, and at the foot of the chimney the third
Bunsen burner, which is not represented in the illus-
tration, finishes the combustion. To heat the apparatus
requires an hour and a quarter, and when the tempera-
ture is 2500° to 3000° F., the body is placed in the
furnace, and in about an hour is cremated. The
152 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
amount of fuel used is little more than half a cord of
wood, or its equivalent.
The furnace which will be used at the Cincinnati cre-
matorium is on a novel system devised by Mr. M. R.
Conway. After the fire is lighted, steam is generated
by means of pipes situated in the flues ; this steam
passes up through the center wall of the furnace and is
distributed over the incandescent coke. In its passage
it gathers air enough to supply the required oxygen.
It also brings with it the gases generated from the body
being incinerated, and all these gases are regenerated
into an intense heat in the combustion chamber; mak-
ing a perfectly odorless furnace.
I quote from a pamphlet written by an " eye-witness "
of cremation, who had before looked upon it with repug-
nance, but who on witnessing it became a most earnest
advocate : —
" A furnace fire is built and kept burning for 20
or 30 hours before the cremation is to take place.
Immediately above the fire is placed in a horizontal
position a cylinder of clay called the incinerator, three
feet in diameter by seven feet long. This fire-clay
incinerator, the walls of which are from one to two
inches thick, receives to itself the intense heat of the
fire below, but does not admit the flames. The conse-
quence is that the body, when placed in the incinerator,
is not, in a proper sense of the word, burned. It is
reduced to ashes by the chemical application of intense
heat. Gases are driven off or absorbed, and being car-
ried down into the fire from the incinerator and led
back and forth 25 feet through its flames, are utterly
consumed. Even the smoke of the fire is consumed,
and nothing can be seen issuing from the chimney but
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 153
the quiver of the heat. The process might be called, as
we have said, the spiritualization of the body, the ethe-
realization or sublimation of its material parts.
" When the incinerator has been raised to a white
heat, it is ready for the reception of the remains. As the
cover is removed from its mouth, the in-rushing air
cools it from a white to a red heat, and the whole
inner surface is filled with a beautiful rosy light which
is fascinating to the eye. It looks like the blush of
dawn upon the sky, or like the exquisite tints which
sometimes flicker along the aurora borealis. There is
nothing repulsive about it, and nothing, as has been
said, to suggest the idea of fire except the intense
heat.
" The body, being decently clad for burial and tenderly
laid in the crib provided for the purpose, is wholly
covered with a clean, white sheet which has been dipped
in a solution of alum. The effect of this is to entirely
prevent smoke or fumes or flame, which would other-
wise arise from putting anything inflammable into the
midst of such a heat; but, under its protection, even
the extraordinary heat of the incinerator does not pro-
duce upon the body the appearance of scorching or
smoking or anything of the sort. There is no such
impression as that of burning made upon the eye. The
sheet, saturated with alum, retains its original position
over the crib, and conceals the entire form until noth-
ing but the bones are left ; and when the eye first rests
upon the remains after they are left in the rosy light of
the cylinder, it sees nothing but these bones gently
crumbling away into dust under the mystic touch of an
invisible agent, whose only appearance to the eye is
like the tremor of the northern lights in the sky ; or,
154 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
more exactly, the radiation of heat from the earth be-
neath the summer's sun.
" You have laid a white-robed form within the rosy
cylinder, and have turned away to think with gratitude
that all is well. You have let your imagination dwell
lovingly upon the pleasing sentiment that whatever
may be left — beside the calcined bones, most pure and
clean — has gone to mingle with the upper air and dwell
with sunshine, birds, and flowers. The darkness and
the dampness of the earth have been escaped, and so
have the perils of grave-snatching, the indecencies of a
possible dissecting-room, and the nameless horrors of
putrefaction. You have pleasant memories to cherish
of the 'last sad hour,' which, instead of 'breathless
darkness ' and the ' narrow house ' and the dreadful
thud of falling earth upon the coffin, presents to mind
a lovely bed of rosy light, and a peaceful form clad in
virgin purity resting within its soft embrace. If a lily
had been laid upon a bed of pinks or roses, in the sum-
mer, and you had seen its fragrance and its beauty all
exhale amid the shimmering beams or radiated heat
beneath the touch of some invisible and gentle agency,
you would have had a not dissimilar experience. And
this is neither painful to the eye, nor distressing to the
sensibilities, nor ungrateful to the memory."
The following beautiful description of a cremation of
the future is from the Modern Age for January, 1884,
a journal which, alas ! was discontinued for lack of
support : —
" It is not a disagreeable journey on which we now
propose to take our readers. It is to witness the final
disposition of a friend's remains in the ideal crematory
of the future — science having already perfected the
THE PROCESSES OF MODERN CREMATION. 155
mechanical appliances necessary in conducting it in the
way we describe. Our friend lias died, and through
the usual announcements we learn that the last rites
will be performed in the columbarium at a given hour.
Repairing thither at the appointed time, we first pass
through a grove of stately trees, the soothing murmur
of whose rustling leaves brings peace and quiet into
the hearts of those who mourn and gather to pay the
last tribute. Within the grove stands a massive build-
ing of gray masonry whose architecture shows no striv-
ing after ornamental effect, and whose solid proportions
give a sense of eternal permanency. A few small
windows in a simple frieze which crowns its walls do
not destroy this effect, and their plain stained glass
clashes in nowise with the harmony of color between
the sky, the trees, and the gray stone of the temple of
rest. About the Doric pillars of its portico green vines
twine fondly as if they, too, would do their share in rob-
bing death of all its hideousness. To this place loving
hands have borne the body of our friend. No coffin
lends its horror to the journey from this earthly home
to here, where eternal sleep awaits him. A flower-
strewn bier gives poetic carriage for this short and final
journey. Entering the broad portal, the soft, deep notes
of an organ charm the ear. The eye takes in a most
imposing sight. The entire interior of the building is
one impressive room, with walls, floor, ceiling, all of
white and spotless marble. The view is not a dazzling
one, for the light is subdued and comes in varied color
through the windows at the top. On either side of the
chamber stand a few memorial statues, — real works of
art, — each one of them keeping alive the memory of
some one who in his life was either good or great.
156 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Many of the marble slabs in the sides and floor of the
temple bear in plain, sunken -letters, a name and two
dates. Behind or beneath them are niches containing
urns where rest the pure white ashes of the beloved
dead. On a simple dais in the middle of the room lays
the body of our beloved friend. The hour has come,
and about it are gathered those who knew and loved
him while he lived. The scene, the surroundings, the
subdued music of the organ, the absence of everything
to jar upon the taste or senses, brings on a mood of
solemn contemplation. No thought of physical corrup-
tion jars upon our memories of the dead. The opening
words of the speaker are said, a hidden choir harmoni-
ously chants of hope and life, and now the end has
come. With the words ' ashes to ashes ' a white pall is
thrown over the dais, and we have looked upon our
friend for the last time. The dais noiselessly sinks
from sight, a short hour is spent in listening to a
funeral oration, or in contemplation, until the dais, still
covered with the pall, rises from below. The pall
removed, we see upon the dais an urn — provided be-
forehand, and containing the ashes of our friend. This
is now sealed into one of the niches, and the ceremony
is over. This is not pure imagination. Modern inven-
tion has now robbed incineration of all its objectionable
features. Never till of late years could the world well
and simply solve the problem of what to do with its
dead. The whole process is carried on as we have
pictured, and without a single revolting feature in any
part of it."
CHAPTER V.
THE MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. — THE
OBJECTIONS TO CREMATION.
r I ^HE battle between torch and spade is not new ; it
-*- has been going on since early times. Tertullian,
a writer of the second century, declares that many of
the Gentiles were opposed to cremation on the score of
the cruelty which it did to the body, which did not
deserve such penal treatment. This is exactly what
some are asserting now. The work of an ancient Greek
poet even contains a passage requesting Prometheus to
take back the fire which he had procured them. There
was a time when the Pagans were disputing the pro-
priety of burning the dead upon any consideration
whatever. Heraclitus advocated cremation; Thales
and Hippon, earth burial. In the war which a few
Christians are now waging against incineration, we
therefore only have another illustration of how history
repeats itself. Peoples are still contesting the point in
lands which are painted in Pagan black upon the maps
of the missionaries, and where Christians as yet have
no footing. Some sects in Japan bury and some burn
their dead ; some of the Hindoos practice interment,
others incineration.
The injudicious promoters of cremation are among
the greatest enemies of the reform. The utterance that
incineration should be obligatory was extremely unfor-
158
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
tun ate, as was the idea of producing illuminating gas
for general use from the combustion of corpses, some-
thing after the fashion of the twelfth century's lanternes
des marts. The fancy of Sir Henry Thompson to use
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 159
the ashes resulting from cremation as a fertilizer was
also a mischievous idea, and did much to delay the
progress of incineration in Great Britain.
The abhorrence entertained by many of cremation
depends, to a very great extent, on the universal
tendency of individuals and peoples to resent any inter-
ference with established customs; to reject any innova-
tion, simply because it is an innovation. For instance,
if cremation should be the customary practice at the
present time, a proposition to re-establish inhumation
would meet, I am certain, with the most violent oppo-
sition.
The cremationists are now charged with enthusiasm
and fanaticism by individuals who would be content
that science should " stand at gaze like Joshua's moon
in Ajalon." Most of the progress in all departments of
learning has been made by enthusiasts, and a man must
be an enthusiast indeed to withstand the prejudice
" dry as dust " which yields the ground slowly and
grudgingly, but which is certain to be defeated in the
end.
The first question that comes before us for consider-
ation is, Would not cremation destroy the evidence of
crime ? This refers not only to cases of poisoning,
but also to those instances where persons meet with a
violent death by being shot, stabbed, or otherwise
severely injured. This is the only tangible objection
that has ever been made by the anti-cremationists. It
is of great importance, and unless we are able to show
that it can be obviated, we must admit that it consti-
tutes a serious drawback to cremation. This, as Dr. J.
O. Marble appropriately remarks, is, in fact, the one
and only real lion in the way of the progress of in-
160 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
cineration as a substitute for inhumation, and unless
we can muzzle this lion, he may frighten away the
pilgrims.
If the charges made by the anti-cremation party
were true, incineration, if established, would offer facil-
ities for the commission and concealment of hideous
crimes. A victim could be destroyed by poison, the
dead body carried to a furnace and reduced to a small
heap of ashes in a short space of time, and the crime
thus forever placed beyond the reach of detection. The
cremator, then, would become the instrument and ac-
complice of the murderer. It is urged that the agents
employed in the commonest form of secret murder —
poisoning — ■ are often of a novel, subtle, and various
character. We are apprised that it is extremely im-
probable that the physician called in, if he be called in,
has ever seen their effects, either on man or animals ;
that care will be taken that he shall not see them ; that
the poisoner has the advantage of preparation on his
side ; and finally, that discovery, when made, is gen-
erally made at some variable period after death, and
then rather in consequence of an aggregation of sus-
picious collateral circumstances pointing to the com-
mission of other crimes of a like nature than of any
possible observations at the bedside of the murdered
person. Indeed, a formidable array of arguments,
which can be, nevertheless, overcome in several ways.
The question now before us for solution is not of recent
date, but has already agitated the minds of the an-
cients, who, most probably, investigated the cause of
death before they consigned their dead to the funeral
pyre. Tacitus, the Roman historian, relates that the
corpse of Germanicus lay in state in the forum of Anti-
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OE INCINERATION. 161
och, a place fixed for sepulchral rites, but that "whether
it bore the marks of poisoning yet remains undecided,"
for the people were divided in their opinions, some
pitying Germanicus and suspecting Piso's guilt, others
prejudiced in favor of the latter.
Pliny also relates in chapter 71 of his Natural His-
tory, lib. xi : " It is claimed that the heart of those who
die of mo?*hus cardiacus (organic heart disease) cannot
be destroyed by fire, and the same is said to be true of
the heart of poisoned persons." An oration of Vitellus
is extant in which he accuses Piso, the physician, of
having poisoned Germanicus, since the heart of the lat-
ter would not burn. Piso defended himself by describ-
ing the disease of which the emperor had died.
Dr. J. O. Marble, who has written of this subject,
affirms: "It must be admitted that cases of criminal
poisoning, such as would be detected by an exhumation
and examination of a buried body, are very rare, for in
our day Lucrezia Borgias and Brinvilliers are few and
easily detected. In a community like ours cases of this
kind are extremely rare. In a vast majority of cases
the cause of death is perfectly evident to any intelligent
physician. No doubt obscures the case. The list of
causes of death, perfectly evident even to the friends
and non-medical persons, embraces probably at least
nine-tenths of the whole mortality. Doubtful cases
have generally been visited by more than one skilful
physician. The fraction in which crime of any sort
might have been perpetrated becomes thus very small.
Moreover, in the present state of chemical analysis
and expert medical testimony, the advantages of the
posthumous examination of a body with a view to
162 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the detection of crime accrue less to justice than to the
lawyer for the defense."
The medico-legal objection, as it is called, does not
apply in every case, since every day individuals die of
easily determined causes, such as small-pox, consump-
tion, hemorrhage from the lungs or stomach, drowning,
or other accidents, and suicide ; in short, in such a way
as to place the cause of death beyond cavil and dispute.
It is true that a regular proportion of bodies are dug
up every year on suspicion of foul play ; but, aside from
the fact that that proportion is very small, how many of
these cases justify the exhumation? So uncertain and
inaccurate is the post-mortem evidence of criminal poi-
soning, that no bodies have been exhumed for forensic
purposes in Vienna, Austria's capital, since 1805.
Tarchini-Bonfanti, for 26 years perito-medico (med-
ical expert) at the tribunal of Milan, Italy, declares
that during this time, although many thousands of
litigations came before the court which was requested
to pronounce judgment upon them, only in ten cases
was it necessary to resort to exhumation. Only ten
cases in 26 years, out of several thousands of law-
suits, and four only out of the ten exhumations led
to the detection of the crime and the criminal. These
four cases, however, occurred in a single lawsuit — that
of Boggia. In this instance the disinterment would
have taken place, even if cremation had been at the
time an established and universal custom, for Boggia
had buried his victims in his own cellar. Tarchini-Bon-
fanti asserts that exhumations for forensic purposes are
extremely rare, and that those which are made yield
either negative, or at best doubtful results.
Disinterment, instead of furnishing an explanation,
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 163
instead of shedding light upon some mystery, more
often is followed by confusion, and may give rise to
erroneous conclusions. It would be next to impossible
to cremate a murdered person in a furnace of the ordi-
nary kind. As to the poor and ignorant murderer, the
regulation of cremation would make him shrink from
submitting his victim to the authorities of a cremato-
rium, and he would find it far more convenient and safe
to inter the corpse secretly, as these criminals generally
do at the present time.
There are many poisons which, by a rapid change of
their substance, are extremely difficult to detect in the
human body after death, even after a short time, some-
times but a few days ; for instance, cyanide of potassium,
prussic acid, and at certain times phosphorus. But
when a careful inquest, such as the cremationists pro-
pose, is held, poisoning by these agents cannot so easily
escape detection. In poisoning by phosphorus, the yel-
low hue of the face of the victim would excite suspicion
and lead to a post-mortem examination, when the char-
acteristic sign of phosphorus poisoning in the fatty de-
generation of the liver would be discovered. An au-
topsy would speedily make evident poisoning by pure
prussic acid, for the open cavities of the body would
exhale the odor of bitter almonds. Poisoning by cyan-
ide of potassium can, of course, only be detected by a
chemical analysis of the contents of the stomach, intes-
tines, etc.
I think I may safely affirm that it is impossible for the
best of anatomists to determine the lesions, if there be
any, of a decomposed body.
All vegetable poisons, except the alkaloid of strych-
nia, decompose with the body; it is extremely rare that
164 CBEMATION OF THE DEAD.
any alkaloid can be discovered in the body posthu-
mously. Mineral poisons, such as antimony, lead, cop-
per, combinations of baryta, and many others, are inde-
structible, and can be detected in the ashes. It may
even happen that, by some extra care, the process of
incineration may be the most efficient means of detect-
ing poisoning by arsenic and mercury. Of course we
should not forget that, without some precaution, the
salts of arsenic and mercury would be volatilized ; but
while they are volatilized, they must also, at a reduced
temperature, be again deposited, and it remains for the
chemist to determine the most efficient contrivance for
recognizing its deposition.
Direct experiments instituted by M. Cadet and veri-
fied by MM. Doursant and Wurst, even prove that the
salts of arsenic can be detected in the ashes after incin-
eration.
As matters stand to-day, it is puerile to think that we
can prevent the rich and skilful poisoner from commit-
ting crime as long as we permit him to employ under-
takers, who, without restraint of law, inject arseniate of
soda and corrosive sublimate into the body of his vic-
tim, and thus remove all traces of the crime.
Dr. Cameron, in a speech before the House of Com-
mons of England in 1884, declared : —
" Numerous modern researches have shown that putre-
factive fermentation in decaying animal matter gives
rise to the formation of sepsine and other alkaloids, some
of them intensely poisonous. Little or nothing is
known in this country concerning the products of putre-
faction. Ptomaines is the general name which has been
given to them abroad, and I don't know that I ever saw
it printed in the English language. Little is known of
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 165
these ptomaines even by those who have studied them
most closely, but enough has been discovered to show
that we must be very careful as to how far we rely upon
what are called physiological tests for poisons in the case
of bodies which have been exhumed ; and that the fact
that frogs, rabbits, or dogs are killed by the action of
matters extracted from the viscera of a putrefying body
can no longer by itself be held as proving that those
viscera contained any poison before putrefaction com-
menced."
Is it surprising, when the above is taken into consid-
eration, that the testimony of chemists at trials for poi-
soning should vary so much and be so contradictory in
nature ?
Sir Henry Thompson, in his admirable exposition of
cremation, which was translated into almost every civ-
ilized language of the world, thus disposes of the med-
ico-legal objection : —
"It has been said, and most naturally, what guarantee
is there against poisoning if the remains are burned, and
it is no longer possible, as after burial, to reproduce the
body for the purpose of examination ? It is to my mind
a sufficient reply that, regarding only 'the greatest good
to the greatest number,' the amount of evil in the shape
of disease and death which results from the present sys-
tem of burial in earth is infinitely larger than the evil
caused by secret poisoning is or could be, even if the
practice of the crime were very considerably to increase.
Further, the appointment of officers to examine and cer-
tify in all cases of death would be an additional and very
efficient safeguard. But — and here I touch on a very
important subject — is there reason to believe that our
present precautions in the matter of death certificate
166 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
against the danger of poisoning are what they ought to
be? I think that it must be confessed that they are
defective, for not only is our system inadequate to the
end proposed, but it is less efficient by comparison than
that adopted by foreign governments. Our existing
arrangements for ascertaining and registering the cause
of death are very lax, and give rise, as we shall see, to
serious errors. In order to attain an approach to certi-
tude in this important matter, I contend that it would
be most desirable to nominate in every district a prop-
erly qualified inspector to certify in all cases to the fact
that death has taken place, to satisfy himself as far as
possible that no foul play has existed, and to give the
certificate accordingly. This would relieve the medical
attendant of the deceased from any disagreeable duty
relative to inquiry concerning suspicious circumstances,
if any have been observed. Such officers exist through-
out the large cities of France and Germany, and the
system is more or less pursued throughout the prov-
inces. In Paris no burial can take place without the
written permission of the '•medecin verijicateur '; and
whether we adopt cremation or not, such an officer
might with advantage be appointed here."
Sir Henry suggests that in suspected cases the "dead
officer" should retain in sealed vessels the stomach and
other portions of the viscera for future examination.
But I think it next to impossible that such an officer
could execute duties so burdensome and so averse to
the genius of the people.
Let us for a moment turn to our dear American com-
monwealths. Do our burial laws aid in the detection of
crime ? In the majority of states a death certificate,
signed by a physician, must be filed with the health
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 167
officer, who issues a burial permit. This is all which is
required. Generally it makes no difference whether
the physician or surgeon who affixes his name to the
document is reputable or not. The burial permit is
looked upon as a mere formality, an unnecessary insti-
tution, that owes its origin to some whimsical law-
maker. How often do even the most zealous of health
officers investigate the causes of the deaths that are
reported to them ? The doctor's certificate is put upon
record ; that is satisfactory, and no more is asked for.
The rest is silence — like that which reigns under the
turf, where the undetected victims of the poisoner lie.
Now, if our faulty burial laws, if the indifference of
our officers of health, are not a direct incentive to the
foulest and most insidious forms of crime, I do not
know what is. Were I a secret assassin, I certainly
would wish for no more encouragement. As matters
now stand, any evil-doer, with the help of some unscru-
pulous medical man, may commit murder daily without
fear of detection.
I propose to show that if incineration were estab-
lished, the careful scrutiny of corpses and official exam-
inations in suspected cases, which would precede the
reduction of the body to ashes, would rather assist in
the detection of murder than hinder it.
Mr. W. Eassie, in a lecture delivered at the Interna-
tional Health Exhibition last year, expressed himself
anent this question as follows : " With regard to doubt-
ful deaths it would be necessary to make sure that the
body exhibited no traces of poison, or that certain small
portions of the body should be removed therefrom and
kept for a few years. For instance, a small portion of
the stomach and intestines and their contents in case of
168 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
vegetable poisoning, and a small portion of the liver,
should mineral poisoning be suspected. There is no
difficulty in dealing with this matter in other countries
where cremation has become permissive ; and it is upon
record that the examination of the body of a child in
Italy, which had been made in the ordinary way de-
manded by the authorities previous to the cremation,
proved that the child had been poisoned apparently by
sweetmeats, and this would not have been revealed had
an ordinary burial in the earth taken place."
I must here repeat what I have already said regard-
ing Sir H. Thompson's intimation that part of the bodies
about to be cremated might be conserved for future ex-
amination : The strong dislike of the public would never
allow of such a measure.
Lord Bramwell, the eminent English lawyer, in a let-
ter to Sir Spencer Wells concerning incineration, states :
" I wish you success in the promotion of cremation ; I
think it is right, and what is very rare, with no draw-
back. It is the cheapest, the most wholesome, and to
my mind, the least repulsive way of disposing of the
dead and those we have loved. That it is legal there is
not a doubt. The only objection, that murders might
go undetected, I believe to be more than unfounded.
You have surrounded the thing with precautions. I
have heard it suggested that there are many murders
which escape detection for want of suspicion and conse-
quent inquiry. How that may be I know not, but it
will not be the case with those bodies cremated under
the regulations of the Cremation Society of England.
The English society requires such undoubted proofs of
natural death that a criminal would not dare trust his
victim to the flames."
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OF INCINERATION. 169
To cut a long story short, let me say that cremation-
ists meet the medico-legal objection by a demand for a
careful inquest over every dead body, and a post-mortem
THE BUFFALO CREMATORIUM. (Interior View.)
examination, including a chemical analysis of all the
viscera, in every instance where death by toxic agents
is suspected.
In many cities of Europe the dead are examined hy
physicians appointed by the government. The result
has been that, as for instance in Dresden, Leipsic, and
170 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Frankfort, Germany, no exhumation took place after
the inquest became obligatory and was practiced in
every instance of decease.
In Bavaria, Saxony, Nassau, and Baden, there are
regular coroners whose duty it is to inspect every
corpse, while in England the coroner's jury only con-
venes in cases where the cause of death is not apparent.
With us the office of coroner is not an important one.
Generally laymen are appointed to it, men who have
done some work at that awful power, the political
machine. This is wrong. The office of coroner should
only be vested in medical men, and only in such who
have shown that they are qualified to fill such a position
of consequence. Every candidate for coroner should be
examined in forensic medicine and pathology, and
should give an ocular demonstration of his capability to
make a thorough autopsy. Only those who have grad-
uated from a medical school of repute, recognized by
law and all the boards of health of the country, should
be eligible.
The coroner should have power to demand an expla-
nation of the cause of death from the physician who
attended the deceased in his last illness, and whenever
such explanation is unsatisfactory, or there are other
reasons which lead him to suspect that the defunct has
been foully dealt with, to order a complete post-mortem
examination. He should, furthermore, have the right
to summon before him any witnesses whose testimony
might clear up the case in hand.
The coroner should issue the burial permits, the
health officer being notified only when persons have
died of an infectious or contagious disease.
To make this scheme successful, it is essential that
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECT OE INCINERATION. 171
the practitioner of medicine who assumes the coroner-
ship should receive adequate payment for his services,
such remuneration in fact as would enable him to give
up his whole time and talent to his office.
Beside the advantages which I have already indicated,
a system such as this would doubtlessly enrich the mor-
tality statistics as well as forensic medicine and patho-
logical anatomy. That it would be an efficient safeguard
against crime, I think every unprejudiced person will
admit.
If this were not so, I could but indorse the Rev.
H. R. Haweis, who declares honestly : " For so grand a
benefit to mankind, a few more cases of poisoning would
be a small price to pay. In the great progress of social
and sanitary reform I cannot conceive what it signifies
whether or not an additional Smith or Jones gets pois-
oned here and there."
Dr. Purdy says : " Indeed, we have not in man's his-
tory any great benefit resulting from a system or prac-
tice but it is attended by its consequent minor evils ;
no great public good but has its attendant draw-
backs."
Tor these reasons the following saying of the cele-
brated Professor Coletti, of the University of Padua,
Italy, will always be recognized as a truth of unusual
stability : " The health of whole communities is of far
greater importance than the possible escape of a few
criminals."
The enemies of cremation inquire : Would not incin-
eration deprive the schools of medicine of anatomical
material, the phrenologists, craniologists, and last, but
not least, the anthropologists, of the basis of their inves-
tigations ; namely, the human skeleton ?
172 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Objections of this nature can only provoke a smile.
In a country like ours, where many of the cadavers
which are dissected in our medical schools are stolen
from the graveyards, the proposed introduction of cre-
mation must, no doubt, raise a storm among teachers of
anatomy, who are fearful that the supply of corpses
will be cut short by the reform. It is not to be won-
dered at, that the anatomists raise a cry of alarm, for,
indeed, I know of no other method of disposal of the
dead that is as damaging to their relations with the
defunct as cremation. Even a professor of the Jeffer-
son Medical College, a man who ought to have known
better, joined the anti-cremationists for these reasons.
Every educated person knows that a thorough knowl-
edge of anatomy is essential to the successful practice
of medicine and surgery, and that a familiarity with the
internal workings of the human system can be gained
in no other way under the sun. But although I belong
to the medical fraternity, I can but wish that such a
terrible and desecrating practice as grave-robbing be
put a stop to. It is for the government of each state
to provide fully for the dissecting-rooms of the medical
colleges, to deliver to them all who die in prisons and
poor-houses. Prisoners should not be given up, even
when claimed by relatives or friends ; the idea that the
commission of crime may land one on the dissecting-
table may deter many from trespassing the laws of their
country.
What difference it makes whether future generations
know, or do not know, how our skulls compared with
that of a gorilla, I cannot conceive. Let the craniol-
ogists and allied scientists make their investigations
THE OBJECTIONS TO CREMATION. 173
now and record them in books. Printed matter of
value is immortal.
How the archaeologists and anthropologists, ignoring
the printing press, can imagine (for such fears only
dwell in their imagination and have no real foundation)
that without the records of the tombs the present age,
its acts and deeds, might pass away from the ken of
posterity as completely as the ancient civilizations of
Central America and Malacca, I am unable to explain.
But even if dire oblivion should be the ultimate doom
of the nineteenth century, the opinion of the world
two thousand years hence is of little consequence when
compared with the health of those now inhabiting it.
In the words of the learned rector of the University of
Padua, Professor Coletti : " Man should disappear and
not rot ; he should no more be transformed into a mass
of corruption — the source of filthy and injurious
exhalations — than into a grotesque mummy, a shape-
less mixture of pitch, resin, and perfumes; man should
become a handful of ashes and nothing more."
"Would not cremation rob nature of its supply of
ammonia ? "
This, one of the most discreetly urged weapons
against cremation, was that promulgated by Professor
Mohr, who asserted that if incineration were practiced
to its full extent, an interruption to the order of nature
would ensue, since the supply of ammonia would be
arrested or greatly curtailed.
Dr. Mohr's objections to the cremation of the dead
principally rest upon the following bases : —
1. That ammonia is the most important form in
which nitrogen is taken up by the plants.
174 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
2. That free nitrogen does not, or at any rate in
sufficient abundance, return to the organized world.
3. That in cremation the ammonia is entirely
destroyed, and the nitrogen entirely liberated.
4. That the nitrogen of buried corpses is entirely
converted into ammonia.
Mohr soon had many followers who imagined that if
the bulk of all animal remains should be burnt to ashes,
the mischief produced by the loss of ammonia would
be incalculable. They claimed that it is as necessary to
vegetable life as is the air we breathe to us ; that there
is no counterbalance in nature whereby this ingredient
can be supplied from other sources; and that by cutting
off a large proportion of the supply of ammonia the
loss would be quickly felt throughout all the animal
kingdom, and would soon be followed by an appreciable
diminution of animal life on the globe.
Dr. Mohr's objections were met by the eminent Pro-
fessor Franchimont, of the University of Ley den, Hol-
land, who proved that the views held by his confrere
were both erroneous and absurd, and concluded his
expose as follows : —
1. That it is not proved that ammonia is the chief
nitrogenous constituent of plants.
2. That it is proved that free nitrogen returns by
many and various routes to the organic world.
3. That it is not certain that by interment all the
nitrogen becomes ammonia, and that probably a portion
of this ammonia is temporarily taken out of circulation ;
and, finally,
4. That it is not proved that the nitrogen is com-
pletely set free during cremation. And even if this
were so, its quantity, in comparison with that of the
THE OBJECTIONS TO CREMATION. 175
ammonia now yearly produced by the dry distillation
and combustion of coal, is so small that the loss of it
cannot be advanced as any really serious objection to
the practice of cremation.
I must here add that the explanations given by
Professor Franchimont are held to be perfectly satis-
factory by seventeen professors and teachers of botany
and chemistry in the Dutch universities, whose names
are well known in the scientific world.
Students of agricultural chemistry, and others inter-
ested in the subject, should not fail to read Mr. Eassie's
excellent article on the asserted loss of ammonia caused
by the cremation of bodies, in the London Sanitary
Record of Jan. 18, 1878.
It must be remembered that all animals — from the
smallest insect to the largest beast — excrete a great
amount of ammonia during lifetime, which passes off
with the fecal matter, urine, and transpiration.
Besides, it cannot ,be denied that ammonia is formed
spontaneously, during the great electrical processes
which take place in nature, from the nitrogen and water
of the atmosphere. The smoke that emanates from the
chimneys of factories all over the world supplies more
ammonia to the vegetable kingdom than the decompos-
ing animal bodies ever could. And, finally, it must be
kept in mind that we can generate ammonia artificially;
therefore, should a dearth of ammonia ever occur, which
is not very likely, this expedient would still be left to
us.
There is no recorded evidence to show that any dam-
age was done to the Egyptian vegetable world by the
mummification which was carried on for thousands of
years in the land of the Pharaohs. On the contrary,
176 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the country was in a more nourishing condition then
than now.
The sentimental objection to cremation I have already
treated of in a previous work; but since I have some-
thing to add to what I then remarked, I will revert to
the topic.
The subject at first glance is revolting. To some
persons there may be something in the idea of reducing
one's friends to ashes that is repulsive. Yet, when one
makes a careful study of the question, that prejudice or
repulsiveness wears away entirely, and makes way to a
feeling that cremation is correct both in theory and
practice. One should not listen to the emotions in a
matter like this, but study incineration to be able to
judge of it; objections founded on sentiment only are
sure to be wrong.
If the general public knew, as a physician does, the
many changes a body undergoes in the process of decom-
position,— putrefaction and most disgusting changes, —
I think a great deal of their objection to cremation
would be removed. I fancy if people in general could
see the ordinary process of decomposition, they would
be in favor of the quicker and more scientific method of
cremation.
The Bishop of Lincoln intimated that incineration
would keep all future great ones out of the silent com-
pany of those who have in former times added lustre to
England's name. It will do no such thing. I cannot
comprehend what obstacles could stand in the way of
the entombment of an urn containing the ashes of some
illustrious personage who chose to be cremated instead
of buried, in Westminster Abbey.
Mr. William Eassie says : —
THE OBJECTIONS TO CREMATION. 177
" In the play of ' Virginius ' the body of Virginia is
represented as having been placed in an urn, and when
the distraught father inquires for his missing daughter,
the vase is placed in his hands by the sorrowing lover.
When this scene is presented, the thrill which seizes the
audience is succeeded by a sensation of admiration at
the eminently superior system of the ancients. I have
seen the actor Brooke, in this tragedy, and the effect
which he here produced was inexpressible. Many whom
I have consulted as to the feelings engendered at this
point have invariably declared that they were at the
time* complete converts to cremation, and that the sense
of approval only left them when they began to realize
how impossible were funeral pyres in this country. Hap-
pily the Siemens apparatus is now at hand, and its suit-
ability proved beyond cavil."
An eye-witness to the process of incineration says:
"I have stood before the crematory with a faltering
heart. I have trembled at the thought of using fire
beside the form of one whom I had loved. But when,
in obedience to his own dying wish, I saw the door of
the crematory taken down, its rosy light shine forth,
and his peaceful form, clad in white, laid there at rest
amid a loveliness that was simply fascinating to the
eye, and without a glimpse of flames, or fire, or coals, or
smoke, I said, and say so still, this method, beyond all
methods I have seen, is the most pleasing to the senses,
the most charming to the imagination, and the most
grateful to the memory."
" Is cremation illegal ? "
This interrogation I am obliged to answer with a
most decided " No ! " In our country, it is true, the
legal status of the question is somewhat unsettled, but
178
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
I do not believe that any action taken in our American
courts could prevent any persons from cremating a dead
body who wished to do so, provided it was not contrary
1=1 1=1 1=1
1=1 1=1 1=1
^L
M >
P
I
o
I 1=1 1=1 '=!
O o|:
-] CO
1=1
1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1
A. Auditorium.
B. Preparation room.
C. Chancel.
I). Furnace room.
E. Furnace.
F. Fire room.
Gr. Cinerary car.
m
KD
I I
1=1 I 1
to the expressed wishes of the deceased. In England it
is only illegal to burn a corpse in cases where an in-
quest ought to be held or has been ordered. In other
THE OBJECTIONS TO CKEMATION. 179
cases, if the burning is conducted in such a manner as
not to cause a nuisance or offense against public decency,
there is no rule of law to prevent this mode of disposing
of a corpse being adopted. Some time ago a rajah,
who consulted Mr. Eassie as to burning the body of his
ranee, had to be told that what he claimed as a right in
India could not be accorded him in the capital of the
Empire except at a risk of scandal. Thanks to the
decision of Sir James Stephen, the honorary secretary
of the Cremation Society of England would not now be
forced to make such a humiliating admission.
There are, I am sorry to say, individuals who think
that those who are cremated let themselves be burned
only because they are anxious to create for themselves
a little notoriety after death. I can but pity the peo-
ple who believe that Dr. Gross and Garbaldi, for in-
stance, adopted such a means to attract public attention
after decease. Those who now order their bodies cin-
erated after that mysterious power called life is fled,
have the courage of their opinions, recognize the many
advantages of incineration, and allow their convictions
to triumph over local and even family prejudice ; they
are the true martyrs of cremation.
CHAPTER VI.
BURIAL ALIVE. — CREMATION FROM AN ^ESTHETIC AND
RELIGIOUS POINT OF VIEW.
/^UR great American poet, Edgar Allan Poe, says:
^-^ " To be buried alive is beyond question the most
terrific of all extremes which have ever fallen to the lot
of mere mortality."
Is any death more horrible than this? To be em-
braced, unprepared, down in the deep dark grave ! To
awake again with the greatest longing for life, suffering
the most severe bodily tortures, in the coffin ! To realize
that there is no escape from inevitable death! Who
can conceive the feeling of finding one's self in the grave,
the blood rushing to the head, the body trembling con-
vulsively in the vain endeavors of casting off the op-
pressing weight, the organs of respiration laboring
without avail for air, the muscles of the whole body
working without result, and above all, being mindful
of certain death near at hand ?
From time to time anti-crematists, advocates of earth
burial, of course, assert that cases of burial alive are
exceedingly rare and occur very seldom. This is very
erroneous. Our newspapers teem with the reports of
such cases, and one must be a careless reader indeed
not to observe them. As I am a daily peruser of some
specimen of the secular press, and hardly anything of
importance escapes my notice, I succeeded in making a
BUKIAL ALIVE. 181
collection of cases of burial alive, from which I will cite
some striking examples. A Wheeling, W. Va., special
despatch to the Chicago Tribune relates the terrible
fate of a young married lady as follows : —
" One of those ghastly stories of interment before life
has become extinct, which cause an involuntary shud-
der of horror to pass through the reader, is current in
this city to-night. The victim, so the story goes, is a
young married lady of 20 years. In May of last year,
three months after her marriage, the lady was taken
violently ill, and after lingering for ten days, apparently
died. There were certain peculiarities about the ap-
pearance of the supposed corpse, however, which caused
a suspicion in the mind of the attending physician that
his patient might be in a trance, but after keeping the
body for four days with no signs of returning life, the
remains were consigned to the grave, temporary inter-
ment being made in the family lot in an abandoned
graveyard. A day or two ago the body was disinterred
prior to removal to another cemetery. To the surprise
of the sexton the coffin-lid showed signs of displace-
ment, and on its being removed the grave-digger was
horrified to find the remains turned face downward, the
hand filled with long tufts of hair torn from the head,
and the face, neck, and bosom deeply scratched and
scarred, while the lining of the coffin had been torn
into fragments in the desperate efforts of the entombed
victim to escape from her horrible fate. Since the dis-
covery the young husband has been prostrated, and his
life is despaired of. The names are withheld."
The sequent curious case of premature interment
occurred at Leipsic, a small town in the state of Ohio.
A lady who was pregnant died suddenly. She was put
182 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
in a coffin and placed, temporarily, to await the burial-
day, in a vault. Some of her relatives, however, thought
that she had been disposed of too hastily and caused
her coffin to be opened. When the air struck her
body, she revived. She was taken home and recovered
entirely, being soon after delivered of female twins.
A despatch from Woodstock, Out., dated Jan. 18,
1886, to the Detroit Evening Neivs states : —
" One year ago a girl named Collins died, as was sup-
posed, while playing on the street. The body was
moved last week from where it had been buried in the
family plot, and the parents wishing to view the remains,
had the coffin opened, when to their horror they discov-
ered that a dreadful struggle must have taken place
after burial. The shroud had been torn to shreds, the
knees were drawn up to the chin, one arm was twisted
under the head, and the features bore evidence of dread-
ful torture, — all unmistakable proofs that the girl had
been buried alive."
The celebrated English anatomist, Winslow, is said
to have been twice nearly interred alive.
The Marquis D'Ourches, courageous in all other re-
spects, had the greatest fear of premature burial. He
recorded all the stories of burial alive ; he believed in
them, and even asserted that one of his uncles had
awaked under ground.
"I have seen death in every aspect," said a general
to Dr. Josat, a gentleman rewarded for a book on mortu-
ary houses, " and it has never had any terrors for me ;
but I own that I shudder at the notion of finding it at
the bottom of a ditch in the cemetery."
Incomplete death, or trance, as it is called, stands
midway between death and life. During this state the
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 183
senses cannot receive impressions ; they are inactive,,
paralyzed, as it were. Yet the spark of life is still
there and can, under proper care, be retained until the
natural condition is restored. Yet almost always trance
ends through ignorance and carelessness in complete
death.
It is an established fact that there is no certain sign
of death, none but the beginning of decomposition. To
prevent premature burial the body must be retained
until the commencement of decay is visible. Incinera-
tion protects from the horrors of burial alive. Even if
a person in a trance should be introduced into a crema-
tion furnace, the intense heat to which the body would
be subjected would extinguish life immediately and
painlessly.
It is alleged by some who are more impressed by pre-
judice than reason, that cremation is heathenish, brutish,
pagan, atheistic, — in short, contrary to Christian prac-
tice.
This I deny ! To be sure the heathen did practice
it, — the ancient Asiatics (Oriental peoples in general),
Romans, Greeks, Teutons, and Etruscans, — but at the
same time they executed grave-burial ; and yet I have
never heard anybody decry the latter as abominable,
disgusting, and heathenish. It must be kept in mind,
that the first Christians were compelled by their hea-
then persecutors to adopt burial. They were forced to
inter their dead secretly in the catacombs ; they could
not, even if they had chosen to, burn their dead, as the
smoke from the cremation pyre would have betrayed
them.
Why inhumation should have become so universal
among the Christians, that it is looked upon as a neces-
184 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
sary part of the religion, and all other means of disposal
of the dead as heathenish, is not entirely plain. There
is no condemnation of cremation in any of the dogmatic
teachings of the apostles. The early Christians, whether
in Judsea, Greece, or Rome, were mainly of the poorer
classes, who had to bury their dead. The mere fact
that the richer and more educated classes, who were
the most difficult to proselytize, universally practiced
cremation would probably cause that custom to be asso-
ciated with their other heathenish practices.
The Romans regarded the early Christians as a
new sect of the Jews and called them " Nazarenes."
And, in fact, Christianity was born of Judaism ; for
Jesus, the founder, himself says (Matthew v. 17) :
" Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the
prophets : I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." It
is easy to understand how, being an offspring of Juda-
ism, Christianity should adopt that method of disposing
of the dead then prevalent among the Jews. At first,
as Dean Stanley avers, the breach between the heathens
and Christians was not an utter one. According to
this great divine the early Christians inhumed in the
same places as the heathens, and even painted and en-
graved upon the catacombs representations of the pagan
gods. Later on the breach widened, however, and the
Christians, as intimated above, were forced to bury their
dead in seclusion.
It is alleged by some eminent writers on theological
subjects that in the beginning Christians were even
cremated.
Merivale, the historian, holds that letters inscribed
on many of the Christian tombs in the catacombs imply
that the early Christians sometimes burned their dead.
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION.
185
Nevertheless, at the end of the fourth century Chris-
tians heard of burning with horror, and finally becoming
inimical to the practice, although it was nowhere for-
bidden in the New
Testa m e n t , made
haste to abolish it
in Europe.
At the time of
Pope and Dry den a
classical reaction set
in, and now again
may be seen in every
churchyard the bro-
ken shaft, the inver-
ted torches, and
innumerable marble
urns which " in pride
of place " rest upon
the monuments in
our cemeteries.
The phrase " ashes
to ashes, dust to
dust," which occurs in
almost every funeral
sermon preached
by modern clergy-
men, is but an alle-
gory which was derived from the ancient custom of
cineration. It is impossible to imagine ashes without
the act of burning.
The inscription " peace to his ashes " which so often
is found, in black or golden letters, on the tombstones
THE BLACK AND WHITE JASPER URN.
(Barlow Collection.)
186 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
of the present time, preaches incineration in our burial-
grounds.
When the Romans embraced Christianity, it was
transformed completely, and represented a strange com-
mixture of rites partly of pagan and partly of Hebrew
origin. The dalmatica of priests, utensils for cele-
brating mass, frankincense, etc., were derived from the
Jews ; whereas many other things, as for instance the
worship of images, sprung from heathenism. The
papal tiara has a remarkable resemblance to the histori-
cal conical cap of the Roman Pontifex Maximus ; and
to this day the Latin appellation of the Pope is identical
with that of his pagan predecessor. The derivation of
the crosier, the pastoral staff of the bishops, from the
crook of the augurs is undeniable.
The mummy graves and representations upon the
vessels of clay which were deposited in the sepulchres
with the mummies testify that the cross (and indeed
the upright cross) was one of the oldest and pre-Chris-
tian ornaments in the hands of the gods of. ancient
Egypt. It was not before the twelfth century that it
was erroneously made a specific Christian symbol,
ostensibly to demonstrate that although the cross was
most contemptible, yet Christ himself had elevated it
into dignity. Thus the sign of the cross became the
symbol of Christianity. Such wooden crosses, history
tells us, were also placed as a memorial upon the
mounds of heathen graves.
If we would not want to imitate heathenism any more,
we would have to quit eating with knives and forks,
stop wearing boots and pantaloons, and do away with
surcoats and rings. With the exception of steel pens
and matches, but little would be left of our daily neces-
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 187
sities of life that would not be an imitation of pagan-
ism.
The perpetual lamp burning at the ideal grave of the
Saviour on the altars of Catholic churches is an imita-
tion of the lamps which were lit on the memorial days
of the deceased in the columbaria of ancient Rome,
and by whose maintenance slaves, according to testa-
mentary directions, attained the position of freedmen.
The decoration of our burial-grounds with flowers on
the memorial days of the dead is copied from the anal-
ogous usage of the heathenish Romans.
The enemies of incineration say that every Christian
is bound to practice interment because the Bible (I.
Moses iii. 19) prescribes : —
" In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till
thou return into the ground ; for out of it wast thou
taken; for dust thou art, and unto dust thou shalt
return."
The above has no value whatever as evidence for in-
humation ; since at the times when the books of Moses
were written the inurned ashes were also deposited in
the dust, i.e., the earth. The preservation of urns above
ground is a much later custom. The above citation has
no reference to the destruction of a body by fire or de-
cay, but directs simply that the final remains of man,
the dust, be placed in the earth. At least, this Bible
passage might be urged against columbaria, but it has
no bearing whatever on cremation.
If we should have to follow the Bible in all things,
we would have to give up most of our modern inven-
tions. For instance, the day of agricultural machines
would be over, and we would have to tread out corn
with oxen as of yore.
188 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
It must be remembered that the early Christians
practiced many things which Christians now do not
practice ; and they abominated some things which
Christians now universally practice. For instance, the
early Christians did not worship in temples or churches :
they abominated temples as either pagan or Jewish ;
the}^ hated art and condemned statuary and painting,
especially in connection with religion; they destroyed
many masterpieces of ancient art which were not relig-
ious, besides some that were ; and they burned all books
save the Bible. But these notions are no longer a part
of Christianity, and were never part of its true faith.
When the Romans and Greeks knew better than we
know, we exercise no compunction in adopting their prac-
tices. Our boys are taught from the classics ; artists
study the models of Greek, that is, pagan, art ; much of
our philosophy is heathen, and more of our jurispru-
dence. The ancients were wiser than we in practicing
incineration. Why not, then, imitate them in this
respect? Granted even that cremation were a "pagan
custom," not to adopt it when it has been conclusively
demonstrated to be superior to burial, simply because
it is of heathenish origin, shows nothing but miserable
narrow-mindedness.
If cremation is a "pagan custom," how about inter-
ment? Earth-burial to-day is practiced by more heathens
than Christians. Or are not those whom we choose to
style pagans in the majority? Would it not, therefore,
be far more correct to denominate inhumation a pagan
custom ?
Dr. Neil declares : —
u It was once considered an eminently Christian vir-
tue, entitling him who practiced it to the honors of
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 189
.canonization, to discard the use of soap and water ; and
this kind of mediaeval piety prevails a good deal yet,
notwithstanding the good old Roman practice of ab-
lution. I do not find, however, that even Christian
sanitarians object to the more frequent use of the bath
because it was the pagan practice."
Inhumation is claimed to be the Christian method of
disposal of the dead par excellence because Christ was
so disposed of.
" By the same sort of reasoning," says the Medical
Times and Gazette of London, England, " might it not
be held that crucifixion has been so consecrated that it
ought to be the mode of capital punishment in Christian
countries ? " Moreover, as the Rev. H. R. Haweis in-
forms us, " Christ is no example to us, for according to
Christian belief he rose from the dead and saw no cor-
ruption."
It is exceedingly interesting to read what Christ him-
self said about burial.
Jesus, being a Jew, like the Hebrews in general had
little regard for burial and the grave. Among the Jews
contact with the dead was considered an act of defile-
ment that had to be soon atoned for.
From the following passage (Matthew viii. 21, 22)
it is plain that Christ was no friend of interment : —
"And another of his clisciples said unto him, Lord,
suffer me first to go and bury my father. But Jesus
said unto him, Follow me ; and let the dead bury the
dead."
By the dead (i.e., spiritually dead) the Saviour, ac-
cording to the best exegesis, meant the outside world,
and he wanted to intimate that burial was fit work for
them, but not for the Christian or disciple.
190 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
See also St. Luke ix. 59.
Christ disparaged the importance of burial more than
once. Indeed, it seems that he paid little attention to
the disposal of the dead. We find him, during his
ministrations on earth, healing the sick, turning water
into wine to make glad the hearts of guests at a wed-
ding feast, administering to the wants of the indigent,
and cheering the down-trodden ; but never at funeral
ceremonies. It was he who declared : —
" God is not the God of the dead, but of the living."
Dr. Le Moyne says : —
" So far as we have knowledge of New Testament
history, we find no command given anywhere which
was a ' thus saith the Lord ' for any mode of burial.
The Christian world was left to choose a mode of
burial."
When Jesus distinguished between cave and earth
burial, he considered the latter the most despicable
mode of burial, to which he compared the scribes and
Pharisees ; for when he reproved them by rebuke and
disparagement, he said (Matthew xxii. 27) : —
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites,
for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which, indeed,
appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead
men's bones, and of all uncleanness."
The above shows in what estimation the founder of
Christianity held inhumation.
■ It seems Christ himself gave the preference to cave-
burial, for so he was disposed of. He was placed (vide
Matthew xxvii. 57-60) in the rock-hewn tomb of
Joseph of Arimathea, which was open in front, and the
door of which was closed with a stone.
Christ was not buried in the earth, but was placed in
THE KELIGIOUS VIEW OF CKEMATION. 191
a sepulchre because he was a Jew. Had he been an
Egyptian, he would have been embalmed after the
fashion of a mummy. It was merely a matter of custom,
and is not necessarily a precedent to be followed. It is
evident that to be buried as Christ was, Christians
would have to be deposited in rock-hewn tombs.
The assertion of certain religious fanatics, that cre-
mation interferes with the Christian doctrine of the
resurrection, proves untenable enough when one but
remembers that both interment and incineration lead
to the same result ; namely, to the total destruction of
the body. In the case of cremation this takes place
within an hour; in earth burial the process may last
for centuries until completed.
Professor Max Miiller, the famous linguist, in his
biographical essays, writes : —
"I often regret that the Jews buried and did not
burn the dead, for in that case the Christian idea of the
resurrection would have remained far more spiritual."
Cannon Liddon believes that : —
" The resurrection of the body from its ashes is not
a greater miracle than the resurrection of an unburnt
body. Each must be purely miraculous. Faith in the
resurrection would have been as clear and strong if the
Jews had burnt their dead, as it is when, as a matter of
fact, they buried them."
Dr. Le Moyne says : — .
"Some religionists object to cremation because it
might possibly throw obstacles in God's way of collect-
ing the particles which once formed the body. They
seem to forget that the dispersion of the atoms which
compose the human body is just as wide and perfect by
inhumation as by cremation."
192 CKEMATTON OF THE DEAD.
Napoleon I., the Great, was a firm believer in crema-
tion. On Dec. 14, 1816, five years before his death, he
conversed freely with his surgeon, Barry O'Meara, on
various topics.
Mr. O'Meara ("Napoleon in Exile; or, A Voice from
St. Helena." By Barry E. O'Meara. W. Gowans,
New York, 1853, Vol. I. p. 277) says : —
" He afterwards spoke about funeral rites, and added,
that when he died, he would wish that his body might
be burned. 4 It is the best mode,' said he, ' as then the
corpse does not produce any inconvenience ; and as to
the resurrection, that must be accomplished by a miracle,
and it is easy to the Being who has it in his power to per-
form such a miracle as bringing the remains of the bodies
together, to also form again the ashes of the dead."''
During another talk with his medical adviser the ex-
emperor said, "that he had ordered the slain burnt after
the battle at Wagram."
I clip the following from the Medical Herald, and
commend it to the notice of opposers of cremation on
the ground of religion : —
" The most prejudiced religionist cannot offer one
valid objection, for if God is to call up the scattered
remains of the dead from both land and sea on the day
of final resurrection, the ashes shall be as easily resolved
from the urn as from the debris of a building in which
bodies may have been accidentally consumed by fire."
I should like to see the Christian who believes that
God will not take unto himself the soul of the brave
fireman, who rushes courageously into a burning build-
ing to rescue his fellow-beings, and has the misfortune
to fall and perish in the flames, while an indolent crowd
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 193
is looking on below. Nay, nay ! I believe that he
will be twice as welcome in the kingdom of heaven.
At the opening of the Bolton cemetery in 1874,
Bishop Fraser combated the anti-cremation movement,
based upon the doctrine of the resurrection, with the
sequent vigorous language : —
" The ancient Romans believed in immortality, and
yet they believed in burning the bodies of their dead.
Urn burial was certainly quite as decent as the practice
of interment; and urns containing the ashes of the dead
were more picturesque than coffins. Can any one sup-
pose that it would be more impossible for God to raise
up a body at the resurrection, if needs be, out of elemen-
tary particles which had been liberated by the burning,
than it would be to raise up a body from dust, and from
the elements of bodies which had passed into the struc-
ture of worms? The omnipotence of God is not lim-
ited, and he would raise the dead whether he had to
raise our bodies out of churchyards or whether he had
to call our remains, like the remains of some ancient
Romans, out of an urn in which they were deposited
2000 years ago."
It is a clerical duty to dispel superstitions. " Super-
stition," well says Sprengel, " is the grave of science."
But it is not only the grave of science, but of all prog-
ress. The clergy should aid the latter and not place
obstacles in its way.
Colonel Olcott says : —
" I am too firm a believer in the immortality of the
soul, to view with patience the inconsistency of those
who behave over the dead bodies of their friends as if
the immortal part were being laid away in the ground.
The more I might love my dead, the less willing I
194 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
should be to leave the fair form that had once held an
immortal spirit to turn into putrid carrion under ground,
and breed a myriad of loathsome creatures out of its
own rottenness. The attempt to substitute the scien-
tific, poetical, and rational system of cremation has my
earnest sympathy. I pray heaven that it may be possi-
ble to commit my body or that of any of my beloved to
the pure flame, that in one short hour will purge them
of dross as gold is refined in the furnace seven times
heated."
Even the organ of the Mormon hierarchy, The Des-
seret J¥ews, that believes in an absolutely literal inter-
pretation of the Bible, reasons thus : —
"Some object to cremation on the ground of its incon-
sistency with the Christian doctrine of the resurrection.
We do not see any force in that. No particle of matter
is destroyed by fire ; it is merely changed in form and
reduced to primitive elements, or in their direction, for
it is not clear that the action of fire extends so far as to
resolve organized matter into its primal atoms. The
same power that can call forth from the tomb a body
that has decayed and gone to dust can quicken the
dried ashes and draw from the elements the gases that
have been dispersed by the flames of the crematory.
How much of the actual particles that are seen now by
the natural eye is necessary to the re-formation of the
human frame into a spiritual body with flesh and bones
does not at present appear. But this is certain : the
power that can resurrect the body from the grave or
from the sea can bring it forth from any place or condi-
tion in the universe. Belief in the resurrection implies
belief in God, and with him all things are possible."
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 195
Kate Field, who of all Americans probably is best
acquainted with Mormon life and doctrines, points out
that when the literal Mormon abjures literalness, it is
high time for orthodox Christians to cast away the
above-mentioned sacrilegious objection.
How, by the way, about those who fall overboard
and are swallowed by the fishes, or those who are blown
up by an explosion? Are they to be consigned to eter-
nal damnation simply because they happened to meet
with an accident? Are they not to be raised here-
after ?
The absurdity and unreasonableness of this erroneous
notion was tersely and happily expressed by the Earl of
Shaftesbury during a conversation with an eminent (Sir
T. Spencer Wells, I believe) promoter of the present
cremation movement. He said: —
" What would in such a case become of the blessed
martyrs ? "
Many of them have been reduced to ashes, and still
these are held sacred.
I would advise the person who holds the opinion that
the resurrection cannot take place after cremation to
seek quickly the nearest physician who makes a speciality
of insanity. I wonder if such persons are conscious
that they commit a sacrilege in doubting that God is
omnipotent.
From a purely catholic point of view it is urged that
incineration would destroy the relics of individuals who
might afterward be canonized.
This is the most ridiculous objection of the whole
lot ! Are not the ashes of a saint as venerable as his
bones ? When such ashes are kept in a sealed urn, we
may be certain of the genuineness of the relics. To-
196
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
day, there is no guarantee whatever of their genuine-
ness — many cities claiming to possess the only real
relics of this or
that saint.
There is no re-
lation between
cremation and re-
ligion. They are
independent of
each other. No
passage in the
Holy Bible pro-
hibits incinera-
tion. The Chris-
tian religion does
not oppose it, nor
does the Jewish,
as I learnt from
an article in the
Jewish Chronicle.
Some newspa-
pers seem to think
that cremation is
contrary to the
Jewish doctrines.
Our brethren at Gibraltar and in the north of Africa bury
their dead in quicklime. No one can deny the ortho-
doxy of the Jews on the shores of the Mediterranean,
3^et more than once have some of their number been dis-
posed of in the manner related above ; the method being
carried out but lately at Mile-end. Among the Jews
at London, instances of cremation are not unknown.
A Swiss clergyman, the Rev. Mr. Lange, declares
THE PORTLAND VASE.
(Originally a Cinerary Urn.)
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 197
that our Saviour never spoke a single word in condemna-
tion of incineration. Dr. Altherr, Religious Journal
for the People (No. 11, 1874), also entertains the same
opinion.
An English Catholic pointed out that cremation
would once more enable us to bury our dead in the
churches, not only in the crypts of the sacred edi-
fices, but also along the sides of the body of the
churches.
Rev. Henry Ward Beecher had a word to say about
cremation in a recent sermon of his. He thought that
the universal Christian teaching of the resurrection of
the body would prevent any general acceptance of it
while that teaching prevails. Of course, a man of a
" classical " education cannot reject incineration alto-
gether, especially when he considers it from a hygienic
point of view.
I have always been of the opinion that a great many
clergymen fear to state their real views concerning cre-
mation, lest their congregation might discharge them
and engage the services of some other theologian ; and I
still have the same impression.
The so-called religious objection to cremation is
wholly unsound, as even a great many anti-cremationists
admit ; it is therefore not surprising that " religious "
opposition is fast weakening and waning wherever it
has existed at all.
A late writer in the Church Review advises us to
take care that incineration does not fall into infidel
hands, and so become at last a symbol of irreligion.
The cemetery is regarded, in general, as a permanent
resting-place of the dead, where they may sleep undis-
turbed. Man of the present time puts his beloved into
198 CREMATION of the dead.
the dirty, dark ground, and hands them over to the
foul putrefaction ; he places upon their graves large,
heavy monuments, as if to keep them down and prevent
them from finding their way back again into this sinful
world. But he thinks not of the festering mass of
corruption hid away under the tombstone ; to him the
departed is more like one asleep, like he or she was
when death claimed the mortal body. He fondly
imagines that his dear ones shall remain there forever,
that their quiet rest shall be unbroken. From year to
year, however, bodies are added to those already buried,
the disgusting state of overcrowding which I described
minutely, with all its evils, shows itself, and then one of
two things happens : either the remains of those buried
before are ruthlessly dug up by the sexton's spade and
thrown into the mud whenever a new grave is made,
or all of the bodies are exhumed and taken away; the
soil is parcelled, and the new generation takes possession
of the " city of the dead."
In some cemeteries corpses are allowed to remain in a
grave only a stipulated time; in English burial-grounds,
where a freehold right is not secured, the remains may
rest undisturbed but seven, in France five, years.
The sentiment of the public is expressed in the
sequent extract from a lecture by the Rev. Brooke
Lambert : —
" There is no subject on which people feel more deeply
than the disturbance of the remains of their ancestors,
and even the displacement of effete memorials of them.
I find that the prevailing feeling is that the dead ought
never to be removed, nor the position of their monu-
ments changed even by a hair's breadth. Now whilst
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 199
our present system of burial remains, such changes in
their places of interment must occur"
When Mr. Walker, the surgeon, inspected the Portu-
gal Street Cemetery at London, England, on April 27,
1839, he discovered that two graves had been opened,
the bones of the remains exposed to view ; and a lot of
coffin-wood, some quite fresh, intended (as he was
informed) for fire-wood.
A gentleman who visited the same burial-ground
some time before (vide Times, June 25, 1838) wrote :
" I was shocked to see two men employed in carrying
baskets of human bones to the back of the ground
through a small gate. I have 12 of my nearest
and clearest relatives consigned to the grave in that
ground, and I felt that I might perhaps at that mo-
ment be viewing, in the basket of skulls which passed
before me, those of my own family thus brutally ex-
humed."
A correspondent to the Weekly Despatch, of Septem-
ber 30, 1838, thus describes St. Giles' Churchyard, where
he had just been : —
" What a horrid place ! It is full of coffins up to the
surface. Coffins are broken up before they are decayed ;
and bodies removed to the bone-house before they are
sufficiently decayed to make their removal decent !
. . . The bone-house is a large, round pit. Into this
had been shot from a wheelbarrow the but partly
decayed inmates of the smashed coffins. On the north
side was a man digging a grave. He was quite drunk.
So, indeed, were all the grave-diggers we saw."
Walker saw the tin plates removed from the coffins
broken up, and witnessed how many wagon-loads of
bones were taken to the charnel-houses.
200 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Lord Ronald Gower writes in Vanity Fair: —
" The other day I came across a somewhat rare little
brochure, — an account of the violation of the royal
sepulchres of St. Denis, during the first French Revolu-
tion. The work of destruction and sacrilege commenced
early in October, 1793, and lasted all the month. The
first corpse found was that of Henry IV, the once
beloved Henri de Navarre. Some curiosity, if not
affection, still seems to have lingered even among those
patriots who have constituted themselves body-snatchers,
and the bearnais was propped up against the church
wall in his shroud, and became quite an attraction for
the crowd. One of the republican guards even conde-
scended to cut off the king's gray, upturned moustache,
and place it on his lip ; another removed the beard,
which he declared he would keep as a relic. After
these marks of attention were exhausted, the body was
thrown into a huge pit filled with quicklime, into which
successively followed those of its ancestors and descend-
ants.
" On the next day the corpses of Henry IV's wife,
Maria cle Medicis, that of his son, Louis XIII, and that
of his grandson, Louis XIV, were added to this. The
body of the sun-king (as Louis XIV's courtiers loved
to call him) was as 'black as ink.' What a contrast
to that majestic, bewigged head, as we see it on the
canvas of Le Brun and Rigault, must not that poor
blackened skull have been! The body of the Grand
Monarch's wife and that of his son, the Dauphin (father
of Louis XV) followed ; all these, and especially the
latter, were in a state of shocking decay.
" The following day poor harmless Marie Leczinska's
body was torn from its resting-place, as also were those
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 201
of the ' Grand Dauphin,' the Duke of Burgundy and
his wife, and several other princes and princesses of the
same race, including three daughters of Louis XV. All
these were in a state of terrible decomposition, and in
spite of the use of gunpowder and vinegar, the stench
was so great that many of the workmen were seized
with fever, and others had to continue the grewsome
work. By a strange chance, on the very morning that
Marie Antoinette's sufferings came to an end on the
Place de la Revolution, the body of another unfortunate
queen saw the light of day, — it was on the 16th of Oc-
tober that the body of our Queen Henrietta Maria, who
had died in 1669, was taken from its coffin and added
to the ghastly heap in the ' Ditch of the Valois,' as the
pit into which these royal remains were hurled was
called; that of her daughter the once 'Belle Henri-
ette ' came next, and then in quick succession the
bodies of Philippe D' Orleans ; that of his son, the noto-
rious regent; of his daughter, the no less notorious
Duchesse de Berri ; of her husband ; and half a dozen
infants of the same family. On the same day a coffin
was cautiously opened. This was found at the entrance
of the royal vault (the customary position for that con-
taining the latest deceased king), and contained the
remains of Louis ' le bien aime.' No wonder that the
body-snatchers hesitated before withdrawing the corpse
from its enclosure, for it was remembered that Louis
had perished of a most terrible illness, and that an un-
dertaker had died in consequence of placing the already
pestilent corpse in its coffin. Consequently it was only
on the brink of the ditch that the body was removed
and hastily rolled over the edge, but not without the
precaution of discharging guns and burning much pow-
202 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
der, and even then the air was terribly tainted far and
near.
"I turn the page and find that we are only in the thick
of all these dead men's bones and uncleanness, for the
republican resurrectionists began by the Bourbons and
had still to disentomb all the Valois, and further back,
up to the Capetian line, and are not content until the
almost legendary remains of Dagobert and Madame
Dagobert reappear. Suffice it to add, that after Louis
the Well-beloved had been disposed of, came in succes-
sion, like the line of royal ghosts seen by Macbeth,
Charles V, who died in 1380, whose body was one of
the few well-preserved, and was arrayed in royal robes,
with a gilt crown and sceptre, still bright ; that of his
wife, Jeanne de Bourbon, who still held in her bony
hand a decayed distaff of wood; Charles VI with his
queen, Isabeau de Baviere ; Charles VII and his wife,
Marie D'Anjou ; and then Blanche de Navarre, who
died in 1891. Charles VIII, of whom nothing but dust
remained, Henry II, Catherine de Medicis, Charles IX,
and Henry III, wTere disinterred on the morning of the
18th ; ' after the workmen's dinner,' Louis XII and his
queen, and among other less interesting royal remains,
the bones of Hugh, Comte de Paris, father of Hugh
Capet ; and so on the work went, till one tires even of
the details of the preservation of this or that king or
queen. Can anj^thing be more shocking than to know
that all the horrors of decay and decomposition will
remain even after two or three centuries have passed
over the lifeless form, and that, supposing one has the
ill luck to be thus coffined and one's body removed, ' a
black fluid, emitting a noxious smell,' will run from out
our last home, as was the case with those royal remains
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 203
during that hot summer month at St. Denis in
1793?"
The Rev. H. R. Haweis says : —
" You cannot preserve the buried dead securely from
the outrages of the living. The people who dig graves,
or are employed to remove bones, are not as a rule
scrupulous, but they are very often drunk. The other
day only a number of wild Irish were so employed at
New York ; the bodies were offered for sale on the
ground to a party of medical students. These young
fellows had the grace to shrink from the horrors they
then witnessed. One coffin was found full of a heavy
decomposed mass, like spermaceti ; it was used to grease
the axle-tree of the cart. Another coffin contained the
body of a woman, aged 20, as the inscription announced.
She had rested for 107 years — laid there with what
tears, what tender regrets of husband, or lover, or
mother ! But now her head was rudely seized and
kicked like a football from one ruffian to the other."
But the "sweet sleep and calm rest" of the dead was
not only broken by the ruthless hand of man, but was
even disturbed by the elements.
On the 26th of August, 1854, at Herrnlanersitz
(Guhrauer Kreis) more than 100 corpses were washed
out of their graves by an inundation. Many of them
remained in their coffins. They were found afterward
in gardens, yards, fields, in the woods, and even in
bouses, whither they had floated. Sixteen days passed
before the bodies were all collected ; some were recov-
ered whole, others in parts ; then they were buried in
one large pit forever (?), as the officiating clergyman
announced.
"I was long since cured of a belief in earth burial,"
204 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
says a very intelligent army officer, "by an appalling
sight I witnessed when going down the Mississippi.
There had been a great freshet, during which the river
had so changed its course as to invade a cemetery and
dislodge its occupants, who, in various stages of decom-
position — the coffins having rotted or been torn asun-
der by the torrent — were floating down the stream. It
was a ghastly spectacle."
I don't think that the people along the banks of the
mighty river were particularly edified with the sight.
And if, at the time, they would have known of some
other mode of disposing of the dead, I am sure they
would have adopted it without hesitation.
A similar occurrence happened at Kansas City, Mo.,
in February, 1886. The Missouri River being blocked
by ice, caused the channel to rise and sweep the lower
part of an island awa}^ that lies opposite the city, and
upon which is the small-pox hospital. About 20 graves
were in this part of the island; they were opened by
the flood and the corpses that had been interred in
them swam down the river in their coffins. These
bodies had been buried only since one year. The peo-
ple on both sides of the Missouri, from which the city
derives its water-supply, were quite agitated over this
affair.
At the same time the cemetery at Copiano, Chili, was
inundated; many of the vaults were full of water and
the coffins were floating around, while many of the
common graves had been completely cleared of their
contents.
The most horrible feature of the situation was that
the water which flows from the cemetery goes into the
river which supplies the inhabitants with water for
domestic purposes.
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 205
The Quarterly Review (No. XLII, p. 380) states : —
"Many tons of human bones every year are sent from
London to the North, where they are crushed in mills
constructed for the purpose, and used as manure ! "
And a correspondent of the Times writes to his jour-
nal from Alexandria : —
" The other day at Sakhara, I saw nine camels pacing
down from the mummy pits to the bank of the river,
laden with nets in which were femora, tibia, and other
bony bits of the human form, some two hundred- weight
in each net, on each side of the camel. Among the pits
there were people busily engaged in searching out, sift-
ing, and sorting the bones which almost crust the ground.
On inquiry, I learned that the cargoes with which the
camels were laden would be sent down to Alexandria,
and thence be shipped to English manufacturers. They
make excellent manure, I am told, particularly for
Swedes and other turnips. The trade is brisk and has
been for years, and may go on for many more. It is a
strange fate to preserve one's skeleton for thousands of
years, in order that there may be fine southdowns and
cheviots in a distant land ! "
Gen. W. T. Sherman once visited the catacombs under
ancient Syracuse. His guide informed him that there
were a million interments, but that the contents of every
chamber had been sold for manure. The general asked
him if a single grave had been spared; not one.
Only a short time ago a London florist bought two
cart-loads of mould, and found it full of legs, arms, skulls,
and other human bones. He brought an action against
the person from whom he purchased the soil for mis-
representing his "goods."
On Feb. 9, 1874, the railroad tunnel under the ceme-
206 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
tery of P&re la Chaise at Paris, France, caved in with
a thundering crash, forming a pell-mell mass of coffins
and bodies, earth and debris.
In our own country the rest of the dead is fast becom-
ing from year to year more insecure.
The Medical Herald affirms : " As the increasing
necessities of man create new demands for space,
graveyards are demolished and converted to other uses.
In Louisville, Ky., within the past fifteen years, two
extensive cemeteries have thus been transformed, —
one on Portland Avenue into a common, and one in
Jefferson Street into a park, called Baxter Square.
" Now the youth stroll along the graded walks and sit
in the shaded nooks, upon the very ground in which
the bodies of their ancestry have decayed. The sacred
spot of last repose of grandparents is now the mirthful
scene of the nocturnal orgies of irreverent grandchil-
dren. Cremation would render this impossible, and
place any profanation of the sacred memorials of the
dead beyond the public eye."
Recently two burial-grounds, — one in New England,
the other in Pennsylvania, — caved in, and the thickly
crowded bones of many generations were exposed to
view.
In my native city, Detroit, four cemeteries, to my
knowledge, were closed and given up to the living. In
every case save one these burial-grounds were excavated,
the coffins, bones, semi-decomposed bodies, etc., carted
away, and business blocks erected in their stead. In
one of these cemeteries a brother of mine was buried;
what became of his last remains I know not. Possibly
they were used to fertilize a field ; or perhaps cupidity
tempted men to steal his body for the purpose of dissec-
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION.
207
tion ; or an unscrupulous grave-digger may have sent
his bones to a bone-mill, vended his coffin-plate, and
used his coffin for firewood. Who knows? I would
give a great deal if the relics of my brother, decently
inurned, could be with me ; but alas ! I must give up
expectations of ever finding any trace of him again.
208 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Within a quite recent period at least two graveyards
in Montreal have been torn up to make public squares;
and it is not likely that any more respect will be shown
to cemeteries in the future than there has been in the
past.
Dr. Wm. Porter says: " I well remember, when a boy,
seeing our old sexton exhume a body buried for several
years, — that of a strong man called away in the prime of
life. The rotting coffin was slowly lifted from its damp
bed, and the lid being broken, we saw within a horrible
mass of putrefaction. Matted hair and decomposing
grave-clothes but poorly covered the blackened skeleton
as it lay in the once handsome casket, now reeking with
the emanation of its loathsome contents. Yet this had
been a beautiful grave ; roses had blossomed upon it,
and the arbor vitas had whispered to it. There would
be but little plea for the grave on the ground of senti-
ment could we see the changes there taking place ;
there would be few, if any, who would not choose that
the body, after faithful service, should be purified by
fire, rather than rot in such a grave."
We are accustomed to consider sacred the venerable
remains of our dead, and the simplest memorial of a
departed friend makes us, if but for moments, sad.
Therefore, all who lay any claim to civilization or
humanity must be vehemently opposed to the profane
exhibition of the bones of the deceased in bone-houses,
where they lie pell-mell in a heap, or catacombs, where
they stand braced against the wall, lie in their coffins,
or are put away in niches, i.e., on the shelf, and where
any dawdling fool may inspect them for a small sum of
money.
The Rev. H. R. Haweis states : "Where are the thou-
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 209
sands who were laid in the heart of Paris, and who
slept for centuries in the graveyards of the Innocents,
St. Eustache, St. Etienne de Pres? Every tourist who
takes a return ticket to Paris may gaze upon their
bones, speculate upon their skulls, and finger their
dust. By order of the minister of police they were all
dug up in 1787 and carted off to the catacombs. The
bones were cleaned and arranged in grim and pictur-
esque symmetry. In one gallery are the arms, legs,
and thighs intersected by rows of skulls; the small
bones are thrown in heaps behind them. Whose dust
is separate there? whose ashes are sacred? And yet
they were borne to this grotesque sepulchre with priests
and tapers."
As regards disrespect and insult to the dead, a corre-
spondent of the Medical Times and Gazette, writing
from Bordeaux, says : —
" The earth around one of the oldest churches in Bor-
deaux seems to have something peculiarly antiseptic in
its nature, so that the bodies buried during ages were
converted into mummies. During some alterations at
the beginning of this century these bodies were laid
bare, and instead of being decently buried again, they
were taken out of their resting-place and ranged up-
right in a row around a crypt under the bell-tower of
St. Michael. Here they constitute a disgusting and
demoralizing show, which is visited by crowds of peo-
ple, and I am afraid that the clergy of the church are
not ashamed to pocket the profits. A rough fellow,
a candle on the end of a stick, such as they have in
wine-cellars, goes round as showman. He taps and
thumps the bodies to show that they are perfectly
sound, tough like leather trunks, and not the least brit-
210 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
tie. ' See here, gentlemen, is a very tall man ; see how
powerful his muscles must have been, and what excel-
lent calves he has now! The next is the body of a
young woman. Remark the excellent preservation of
her chemise, though it was buried 400 years ago ; and
see, it is trimmed with lace. The next, gentlemen, is a
priest; you can see his soutane with the buttons on it.
There is a woman with a dreadful chasm in her breast ;
she had a cancer. The next four are a family poisoned
with mushrooms ; observe the contortions of their faces
from the coliques they suffered. See, next, a very old
man with his wig still awry upon his pate. The next
is a poor miserable that was buried alive. See how his
head is turned to one side and the body half turned
round, in the frantic effort to get out of the coffin, with
his mouth open and gasping.' (It is quite true that
the attitude is singular, but it does not warrant the
inference which the showman draws.) But enough of
this disgusting mercenary exhibition of the human body
in its lowest state of humiliation. If the guardians of
consecrated sepulchres, in which people have paid an
honest fee to be buried, are to dig them up and cart
them off as in England, or make a show of them as
here, why, I can only say that cremation will gain a
good many converts. Any one would prefer urn burial
to the chance of being thus made a spectacle. So good,
too, it must be for the rising population to take off the
edge of any salutary horror they may feel at death and
decay, or of reverence for the dead."
There are many such shows where the human corpse
is used for the purpose of eliciting money from a public
loving horrible and sensational sights. I need but men-
tion the catacombs of Rome, or the Bleikeller of Bremen,
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 211
to conjure up before your mind all the terrible scenes
which the clerical and medical gentlemen whom I have
just cited have pictured.
There is another way in which the dead are insulted,
another mode by which their graves are desecrated.
The monuments which are erected upon the last rest-
ing-place of the deceased to perpetuate their memory
are sometimes moved about till they no longer mark
the spot where the person whose name they bear was
interred. Here, then, all the good intentions of friends
are set at naught ; their expense, their attention, is all
in vain. The tombstones are moved, and when they
become yellow with age they are broken up to act as
headstones for some public highway. That this does
not hold good of European countries only, but also of
American ones, is proven by our honored and beloved
"autocrat of the breakfast table," Oliver Wendell
Holmes, who declares: "The most accursed act of van-
dalism ever committed within my knowledge was the
uprooting of the ancient gravestones in three at least
of our city burial-grounds, and one at least just outside
the city, and planting them in rows to suit the taste for
symmetry of the perpetrators. The stones have been
shuffled about like chessmen, and nothing short of the
Day of Judgment will tell whose dust lies beneath any
of those records meant by affection to mark one small
spot as sacred to some cherished memory. Shame !
shame ! shame ! That is all I can say. It was on pub-
lic thoroughfares, under the eye of authority, that this
infamy was enacted. I should like to see the grave-
stones which have been disturbed or removed and the
ground levelled, leaving the flat tombstones. Epitaphs
were never famous for truth, but the old reproach of
212 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
' Here lies ' never had such a wholesale illustration as
in these outraged burial-places, where the stone does
lie above, and the bones do not lie beneath."
Now be candid ! Do you not think that facts like
these go a good way to endorse cremation? There
would be no need of disturbing the dead, there would
be no vulgar exhibition of the deceased, after incinera-
tion would have been introduced. There would, in
fact, be nothing to do violence to that most sacred and
deep-rooted feeling of humanity, — respect for the
dead.
Among all the outrages on the dead, that committed
by the hand of ghoulish desecration is, by far, the
worst. Body-snatching, for providing anatomical insti-
tutions with material, has become a business in the
United States; love of gain being, as usual, the cause.
And not only are bodies abducted to supply medical
colleges, but persons are liable to be murdered for the
same reason. In February of 1884 two negroes were
arrested at Cincinnati, who, after a severe examination,
confessed to having killed an old man, his wife, and his
adopted daughter ; after which they sold the corpses to
the Ohio Medical College, receiving $15 for each.
But some grave-robberies are perpetrated simply for
revenge, or else for pure deviltry. A special despatch
to the Detroit Free Press, from Point Pleasant, W. Va.,
relates an instance of this kind as follows : —
" Salt Creek, a small stream, empties into the Ohio
River three miles south of this. Two miles from the
mouth is a church called Pisgah, attached to which is a
burying-ground. This morning when the sexton went
to dig a grave, he was horrified to find half a dozen
graves open and the bodies taken from their coffins and
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 213
stretched on the ground. In one or two instances the
limbs were severed from the bodies. The graves had
been opened without regard to family. The bodies lay
in one place arranged in the shape of a Greek cross.
There is no clue to the perpetrators of the sacrilegious
offense, and no reason can be imagined. The bodies
evidently had been exposed for a day or two."
The funeral car of the late A. T. Stewart was fol-
lowed by six carriages laden with gorgeous floral offer-
ings; yet in spite of the more than regal magnificence
of his funeral, and of his great wealth, only a few days
later his body was stolen by sacrilegious robbers, and
has never been recovered. Need I remind you of the
mortification our nation felt on hearing that guards had
to be set to watch over the graves of our lamented
presidents, Lincoln and Garfield.
Not only in our country is body-snatching a frequent
offense, but also in England, as will be seen by the
sequent quotation from Mr. Walker (p. 202) : —
" An undertaker who had charge of a funeral went
with a friend into the vault of a chapel. A coffin
recently deposited was taken under his arm with the
greatest ease. His friend, doubting, poised the coffin,
and was affected to tears from the conviction that the
body had been removed. Several other coffins were in
the same condition."
The corpse of the late Earl of Crawford was stolen
from the Dun Echt mortuary chapel in Aberdeen.
There is one case of outrage on the dead on record
that, for hideousness and devilishness, surpasses all
others. I refer to that grave-digger of Koenigsberg,
Prussia, who fed his swine with human bodies.
One of the most abominable modes of outrage on the
214 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
dead is that where men (beasts is the proper designa-
tion for them) have gratified their animal passions by
outraging the fresh corpses of young and pretty women.
It seems incredible, but this violation was known in the
most ancient times, and is not yet extinct in the pres-
ent age.
Herodotus already reports in the 89th chapter of his
second book, that the Egyptians of old did not deliver
up the bodies of ladies of quality or the remains of
young and beautiful women to the embalmers until
decomposition had set in, so that these men could not
have coition with them. For it was said that an era-
balmer had once surprised a colleague in the act of out-
raging the corpse of a youthful woman, and had
reported the case to the authorities, who punished the
inhuman offender promptly.
The evening edition of the National Zeitung (pub-
lished at Berlin) of Nov. 21, 1874 (No. 544), relates
that in Lichtenberg, which is situated near the capital
of the German Empire, in the night from the 4th to
5th of November, two children, recently buried,
were disinterred and removed from their coffins. On
the morning of November the 5th the corpses were
found on the ground near the graves, — the shrouds were
torn, — and one body, that of a little two-year-old girl,
bore all the signs of a recent outrage.
All these sacrilegious outrages on the dead could be
obviated by incineration. The avaricious would not be
tempted by a small quantity of ashes in a plain urn.
There would be no valuable clothing and no costly jew-
elry, ordinarily inhumed with some bodies, to excite
rapacity.
Furthermore, cremation promises the greatest possible
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 215
security from vandalism. When the urn containing
the remains, i.e., ashes, of our friends or relatives is
placed in a niche in the columbarium, it can be easily
guarded. One watchman, in communication (by elec-
trical alarm) with the police department of the city, will
suffice to protect the urn-hall of a columbarium. The
same cannot be said of a cemetery; it would take at
least a company of watchmen to properly guard the
grounds of a medium-sized graveyard.
Some day we will have Westminster Abbeys on a
small scale, where, amid grand monuments and costly
urns, the simple tablet of wood shall have its place, its
inscription remaining legible, not being blotted out by
the elements, as it is to-day. Each church could have
its own urn-hall, and the burial ceremonies could be con-
ducted according to the belief of the deceased.
The greatest foe incineration has to contend with is
the widespread antipathy against it, entertained and
nursed by people who are governed more by sentiment
than by reason. Which is the most poetical mode of
disposal of the dead, cremation or burial ? Think !
think ! ! think ! ! ! and you cannot fail to find out.
Mr. W. Robinson, F.L.S., says : —
" The simplest urn ever made for the ashes of a Ro-
man soldier is far more beautiful than the costly funeral
trappings used in the most imposing burial pageant of
modern times. Of urns of a more ambitious kind, the
variety and beauty are often remarkable, as may be
seen in our national and various private collections.
It would be a gain to art if some of the money spent
on coffins, which rot unseen in the earth, were devoted
to such urns, which do not decay, and which might be
216 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
placed in the light of day, and perhaps teach a lesson in
art as well as bear a record/'
And the Medical Herald declares : —
" An urn of granite, alabaster, malachite, or one of
the precious metals, with the life-sized statue of great
men placed in the halls of state, would much more be-
fittingly express the state's regard, and preserve and
perpetuate the grateful tribute a Christian people would
pay their memories, than any number of columns and
shafts reared in cemeteries, which must in time be de-
molished."
Which is the more aesthetic, a small heap of pure,
pearl-white ashes, or a grim skeleton? Certainly those
who have seen a decomposing body, or human remains
in the state of adipocere, would not call them aesthetic.
Contrast with the ghastly skeleton, now commonly em-
ployed as an illustration of death, the representation of
death b}^ the ancients, — the boy with the inverted torch.
Which is the more refined?
The strong tombs, of such a grandeur and beauty —
proof against the gnawing teeth of time — mortuary
monuments, — as we shall not be able to leave to our
offspring, testify to the pious veneration for the dead of
the ancients. I need but remind you of the grand
pyramids, the extensive necropolis at Thebes, the mau-
soleums and columbaria of the Via Appia in Rome, to
cause you to perceive the truth of my statement.
The ancients thought of the dead as being turned
into shades ; when we think of them we imagine rattling
skeletons. The stupid and disgusting glorification of
the skeleton did not originate with Christ; it is a prod-
duct of the Middle Ages, as are the many tales of witches
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 217
and ghosts that are related, especially in connection
with churchyards, and still cling to them to-day.
The creniationists of to-day, who propose to substi-
tute a decent aesthetic and sanitary mode of disposal of
the dead for the present harmful and loathsome custom
of inhumation, are repulsed, met by sentimental objec-
tions, are even called monsters without religion, without
reverence for the dead.
But the apostles of incineration are as far removed
from striving to suppress and murder such sacred feel-
ings as is Dan from Beersheba. On the contrary, they
believe that cremation is far more conducive to a pious
veneration for the dead than interment.
What would you rather look upon, that horrible
remnant of mortality, for which, as Bossuet says, "there
has been found no name in any human language," or
the innocuous, pearly ash in the memorial urn of mar-
ble, alabaster, or one of the precious metals?
Cremation is humane, healthful, and, most of all
methods, consonant to the natural impulse of Chris-
tianized veneration for the dead; serving and honoring
that impulse by preventing the exposure of the dead to
those visible elemental and chemical conditions and
operations which breed a revolt of the feelings, and
tend to surround the subject with an atmosphere of
abhorrence.
Undoubtedly, one result of adopting generally the iu-
cinerative burial, will be a clisassociation in our ideas
from that existing and shocking conception of horrible
bodily decay, in which almost every thought bestowed
upon the dead is necessarily enveloped, and we will
learn to contemplate the body with the cheerful philos-
ophy of the Persian poet, Omar Khayyam : —
218 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
'•''Tis but a tent where takes his one day's rest
A Sultan to the realms of death addrest ;
The Sultan rises, and the dark Ferrash
Strikes and prepares it for another guest."
At a burial there is but darkness, at a cremation rosy
light unaccompanied by lustiness; the dead is really
reduced to ashes, and with him the time-honored say-
ing, "Peace to his ashes," is not a hollow phrase, as
it is with those who are interred.
Those who do not wish to miss religious and other
ceremonies at incinerations may use any form of burial
service they like, and those who desire to dispense with
them may do so. And those who already have beloved
dead in the cemeteries may rest by their side when the
end is come, for the ashes can be interred as well as the
body.
A Sicilian poet suggested that along with the ashes
thus buried might be deposited the seeds of some
flower, — such as heart's-ease, violets, or forget-me-nots,
— so that when it sprung up, the friends and relatives
might gather the blossoms from year to year as a dear
memorial of the life that lasts beyond the tomb ; and
Tennyson's (" In Memoriam ") poetic verses would be
realized : —
" And from his ashes may be made
The violet of his native land."
Only when cremation is practiced, can a family obtain
the remains (ashes, of course) of its friends and rela-
tives who have died in a foreign land ; only then it is
possible to deposit such remains with those of the
ancestors.
With the Chinese it is customary to always inter the
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 219
dead in their native land; when they are far away from
home they inhume their deceased temporarily, but at
the earliest opportunity remove them to China, — a usage
that deserves to be imitated.
The small urn containing the parental ashes may be
taken by migratory man into the new world or the old,
always preserved as the most sacred relic of the fam-
iiy. "
How much more beautiful and better would it not be
to have the remains of our kin near at hand, in the
house. Only then we would be reminded of them every
day. Every building could be made to contain a mor-
tuary chamber. Then we would know our dead shielded
from the elements. Now, when the storm rages and
the rain pours down in torrents, we imagine that he or
she whom we have recently buried is yet subject to
the inclemency of the weather. Maxime clu Camp
relates a touching example of the power of illusion.
On one of his walks in the Paris cemeteries he discov-
ered a young lady kneeling before a tombstone, who
was singing (interrupted frequently by her sobs) an
aria from an opera. When she observed him, after she
had finished she said, excusing herself involuntarily:
" There my dear mother lies buried I She loved to hear
this aria ! "
That these questions which I have just briefly con-
sidered are of considerable moment is demonstrated by
the experience of the Rev. Brooke Lambert, who says : —
" It has been my misfortune to lose four of my near-
est relations in different parts of the world. It has
been also a subject of regret to me that their remains
lie so far off. I care little for the fate which happens
to their bodies; and yet, had such a practice as crema-
220 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
tion been in use, it would sometimes have been a com-
fort to feel that I had their ashes with me. Collected
in an urn, they might either repose in columbaria, like
those at Rome, or in a mortuary chapel in my own
house."
This citation brings to my mind a beautiful epigram
of Count Platen, who, as you undoubtedly know, was
called the favorite of the ladies. It is impossible to
translate it, and therefore I will content myself with
mentioning the contents. It entreats the sacred flames
to return, and to purify the air which death has con-
taminated ; it requests those about to bury to reduce
to ashes the body of their friend ; and it rejoices that
the remains of our beloved will again rest in a clean and
decent urn near our abodes.
There are many authors who, in their works, have
expressed themselves in favor of cremation. Among
the first to do this was A. F. Ferdinand von Kotzebue,
a German writer of note, who glorified incineration
in his novel "Die Leiden der Ortenberg'schen Fam-
ilie."
There are those who are afraid that cremation will do
away with all that is mortuary in poetry and song.
For instance, they say : " What will become of Gray's
Elegy in a Country Churchyard ? Allusion to burial runs
so inseparably through its verses that nothing would be
left of them were it eliminated." As a work of art
Gray's masterpiece will live forever; but if reason or
common sense is applied to it, I doubt whether it has a
right to exist, even now. I admit that the poem is
beautiful, that it is grand; but it is all sentiment —
nothing more.
There is now already a new literature, prose as well
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OF CREMATION. 221
as poetry, accumulating. The " Cremazione dei cada-
veri" already has its poets — principally in Italy. Pro-
fessor Giambattista Polizzi of Girgenti dedicated (in
March, 1873) a poem on cineration to Signora Emilia Salsi
when her husband, Doctor Giuseppi Salsi, died and was
cremated. He praised incineration as the best mode to
dispose of the dead, and to preserve the remains of the
departed. In January, 1874, Civelli's printing house at
Milan, Italy, turned out 22 stanzas on incineration, in
the Milanese dialect. The anonymous author is a
patron of cremation. Dr. Moretti of Cannero pub-
lished an excellent poem on cremation in the Annali
di CMmica of 1872. A German author, writing under
the pseudonym of "Dranmor," sent forth some very good
verses on the same subject, as did also the celebrated
Dr. Justinus Kerner.
Mr. William Eassie laments : —
"It is a matter of regret that those of our own poets
who have been in favor of burning the dead did not
enshrine their proclivities in verse. Southey, for in-
stance, wrote that the custom of interment ' makes the
idea of a dead friend more unpleasant. We think of
the grave, corruption, and worms ; burning would be
better.' But he left us no poetry on the subject."
The objections to cineration put forward by the sen-
timentalists are really of no consequence at all; they
are far too trivial to be worth even only superficial con-
sideration. I have only mentioned them, because I am
aware of the strong hold that sentiment has on most
people, and because they allowed of a comparison be-
tween burial and cremation, which is decidedly in favor
of the latter.
222 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Dr. E. J. Bermingham of New York City hits the
nail on the head by saying : —
" We believe the abhorrence entertained by many, of
cremation, depends to a very great extent on the uni-
versal tendency of individuals and nations to resent any
interference with established customs, to reject any in-
novation simply because it is an innovation."
Sentimental objection to incineration resolves into
this: We are the slaves of custom. We love to walk
in the old wornout paths, and when some one discov-
ers a new way that is much shorter, and by which the
destination is reached much sooner, we are loathe to
use it. First only a few adopt it, then more and more
travel over its surface, until finally the old path be-
comes obsolete.
To what an extent people are governed by their time-
honored customs was illustrated by the ancient histo-
rian Herodotus (see Muses, Book III, chap. 88), as
follows : —
"If all people were to choose the most beautiful
among the customs, they would after close examination
select their own, because every nation believes that its
own customs are the best and the most beautiful. One
therefore cannot imagine that anybody but a madman
would ridicule such matters. When Darius reigned he
summoned the Greeks then in his land, and when they
came, he requested them to name the price they would
take to eat their deceased parents. They replied they
would not commit such a crime for all the gold in his
empire. Then he caused the Kalatians (natives of
India), who were in the habit of eating their parental
dead, to appear before him ; when they arrived, he
questioned them (in presence of the Greeks, to whom
THE RELIGIOUS VIEW OP CREMATION. 223
every word was interpreted) how much remuneration
they would want to burn their dead. They cried aloud,
and bade him not to think of such a sacrilege. Thus
custom rules. I believe Pindar to be right when he
asserts in one of his poems that custom is the king of
all."
CHAPTER VII.
ECONOMY OF CREMATING THE DEAD. — THE PRESENT
STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION.
"p\R. F. JULIUS LE MOYNE, speaking of the
-^^^ great expense often lavished on funerals, says : —
"The aggregate of such questionable expenditures
over the United States would amount to billions of
dollars, a sum truly alarming in size ; and this criminal
expenditure has been an important factor in conducing
to the monetary panic 1 still prevailing. This is one of
the many extravagances which account in a great degree
for national financial difficulties. The average expendi-
ture for each body by the system of inhumation may
be placed at $100; The average expense by the crema-
tion plan would not exceed $20, — showing what an
immense national saving would be gained by substitut-
ing cremation for interment."
It must be kept in mind that the expense of a
modern funeral consists of the purchase of a lot in
the graveyard, the funeral expenditure, and the outlay
for the customary tombstone or monument.
The cost of a cemetery to the community is tremen-
dous. The cost of a plain furnace with a columbarium
does not exceed $5000, a mere trifle when compared
with the price of a burial ground.
Imagine what a lot of valuable land — the best soil
is always selected for cemeteries — is lost by our present
1 Dr. Le Moyne's paper was written in 1878.
ECONOMY OF CREMATING THE DEAD. 225
method of disposing of the dead. I firmly believe that
grave}7ards are often a hindrance to the growth of a
city ; but progress cannot be stopped forever ; it may
be delayed for a short time, but finally it will overcome
all obstacles, the dead are carted away, and a world of
activity takes their place.
Graves are not houses which last till doomsday. In
this country where cities grow so rapidly, graveyards
are soon surrounded by dwellings, and a cemetery which
was once far outside of the city limits finally is almost
in the centre of the city. It then becomes necessary to
remove the dead. They are dug up and carted away,
and are, perhaps, quietly dumped into some swamp to
fill it up and assist in the generation of malaria. Busi-
ness blocks are then erected in the place that was once
sacred to the dead, and the peace of the burial ground
is changed for the din of traffic.
The following citation from an editorial of the Detroit
Free Press will serve to elucidate what I have said : —
" The interment of the numerous dead of a large
population in the midst of a large population is very
serious. To it are attributed the constant outbreaks of
cholera in India, and the increase of leprosy in China,
and it is certain as anything can be that the existence
of cemeteries in crowded communities is meeting with
an increasing prejudice. The people of large cities are
already forced to seek, at some distance from their
limits, suitable places for interment. And the exist-
ence of great cemeteries in the suburban communities
themselves is provoking vigorous opposition. At New-
ton, Long Island, there are 13 cemeteries, in which
30,000 bodies of people dying in New York and Brook-
lyn are buried annually. There are, therefore, 60,000
22$
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
THE PROPOSED CREMATORIUM AT CINCINNATI, OHIO.
live people in one part of the town, the rest being
occupied by 3,500,000 dead ones. Property is depre-
ciating and taxes are increasing. People are not at-
ECONOMY OF CREMATING THE DEAD. 227
traded to a town of this sort, and the real estate of the
village has been falling in value for some time."
But the financial deterioration is nothing when com-
pared with the effect which the aggregation of many
dead produces upon the health of the surrounding
population.
In and about New York, Brooklyn, and Jersey City,
4000 acres of valuable land are taken up by cemeteries.
It is calculated that with the probable increase of popu-
lation in the next half a decade, 500,000 acres of the
best land in the United States will be enclosed by
graveyard walls. Think of it ! Five hundred thou-
sand acres of soil that might contribute towards the
maintenance of the living given up to the "cities of
the dead." It is an outrage !
Now, let us compare the cost of burial with that of
incineration. As I have mentioned before, there is an
immense saving of valuable land when cremation is
adopted. Millions of acres now uncultivated, and sim-
ply used for burial to the detriment of the living, would
be changed into food-bearing land and furnish addi-
tional means for the maintenance of the people. A
crematory connected with an urn-hall would not occupy
more space than 360 to 400 square feet, and would last
for centuries. There would also be a diminution of
funeral expenses. The average expense of cremation
in the United States is $25. Contrast this with the
ordinary funeral expense, and you will agree with me
when I assert that the present waste of money for
burials is as enormous as it is unnecessary. Some
author has said justly that the difference in expense
would often equal one-half the proceeds of a life
insurance policy. It is plain that the expense of
228 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
the burning of single bodies will be very much reduced
by the general use of the system. The annual expense
for the cremation of 7000 bodies in Bombay, India,
amounts to 115,000 only, which is but $2.50 for each
corpse.
The cost of incineration in our own country has
varied. It is, of course, impossible to estimate the ex-
pense of the earlier cremations.
The furnace at Washington, Pa., was erected for the
use of Dr. Le Moyne ouly, and those of his friends
who concurred with him in this reform. The public at
one time believed that this furnace had been built for
its accommodation, and that the owner followed cre-
mation as a business, and charged fees for the use of
his crematory. During the lifetime of the doctor no
fee whatever was charged for incineration in his fur-
nace. After his death the trustees of the crematorium
were obliged to charge the moderate sum of $45 to
compensate them for their time and trouble. This in-
cluded all expenses after the body reached the railway
station at Washington, — a hearse, carriage, and box to
contain the remains, as well as fuel, attendance, etc.
The building at Washington was put up at the least
possible expense (as economy was one of Dr. Le
Moyne's principal arguments), and cost in all about
$1500. Compare this expenditure with that of pur-
chasing a cemetery, not taking into consideration the
improvements which must be made on a graveyard
before it can be opened to the public.
It will prove interesting to consider the present state
of the cremation question, and to note the progress
which the reform has thus far made in various countries
of the civilized world.
ECONOMY OF CliEMATING THE DEAD. 229
Incineration is making great headway in Europe. In
Germany, societies were organized at Coeln, Hainichen,
Bonn, Frankfort on the Main, Potsdam, Liegnitz, Chem-
nitz, Heidelberg, Elberfeld, Eger, Breslau, Nordhausen,
Rheda, Kollberg, Bremen, and Schleswig.
Since Prince Bismarck declared that he would not
be adverse to a law regulating and permitting the
practice of cremation in all parts of the empire, the
leading physicians of Berlin and the members and
officers of all the cremation societies of Germany have
petitioned the national parliament — the Reichstag —
to permit incineration in all cities of the empire, not
restricting cremation to Gotha, as has been done here-
tofore.
In Austria, opinion is about evenly divided for and
against the practice. A deputation from the "Urne"
Society of Vienna waited on the president of the
Austrian cabinet to ask that cremation should be
authorized. This society now comprises 800 members,
amongst whom every class is represented ; they have
collected sufficient funds for the construction of a
crematory apparatus. And what was the answer of
the government to this request? The Minister of
Austro-Hungary replied to the Urne Society for the
Propagation of Cremation that incineration is for-
bidden in the empire because public opinion is
against it.
The committee of the Belgian chamber has favora-
bly reported upon a petition for a law making crema-
tion optional.
The municipality of Paris lately decided to cremate
the bodies which have been used at the School of
Practical Anatomy and at Clamort. Over 3000 bodies
230 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
a year are received at these two institutions for the pur-
pose of dissection.
The Municipal Council of Paris also recently author-
ized the erection of three crematories in the Pere la
Chaise Cemetery, according to the Gorini system,
which are to be used for the purpose of cremating the
remains of those persons who die of infectious or con-
tagious diseases. They will be heated with wood, and
are calculated to be capable of reducing the bodies of
50 persons per day at a cost of 15 francs inclusive
of personal expenditure and the cost of an urn for the
reception of the ashes. The Prefect of Police of Paris
has endorsed the decree of the municipality, laying
stress especially on the many advantages — sanitary
and economical — of cremation. He stated that suffi-
cient testimony had been recorded by Kuechenmeister
and many other scientific authorities to demonstrate
beyond a doubt that cremation is a protection against
cholera, yellow fever, and small -pox epidemics. The
furnaces at the P&re la Chaise can be used eight hours
a day. The total expense is estimated at 50,000 francs ;
and preparations will be made to burn 4500 bodies
a year. The establishment of these crematories was
brought about mainly through the efforts of M. Koechlin-
Schwartz, mayor of the eighth ward of Paris ; and the
plan for their construction was submitted to the muni-
cipality in the name of the Commission of the Assis-
tance Publique by M. Chaisoaing.
The French Chamber recently enacted the following :
" Any adult or free minor, capable of being a testator,
may freely determine the mode of his sepulture. He
may elect inhumation or incineration, may will his
body or any part thereof to institutions of public
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 231
instruction or to learned societies, and may regulate
the conditions of his funeral, notably in regard to its
civil or religious character."
The privilege of cremation in the crematories at the
P£re la Chaise is now granted to any one who asks for
the same.
The Paris Municipality will at a future sitting vote
the construction of a sort of lay temple, where families
will be allowed to keep urns or other funereal vessels.
containing the ashes of dead relatives. This will not
necessarily do away with any religious ceremony short
of that of consigning the dead to consecrated ground ;
but, as M. Koechlin-Schwartz says, there is no reason
why urns may not be consecrated, or why Protestants,
Catholics, Jews, and Free Thinkers may not build a
vast mausoleum in which the ashes of thousands could
be deposited in beautiful vessels without injury to the
living.
It is probable that crematories being now legal in
such an art center as Paris, new and beautiful forms of
artistic decoration will grow out of it.
Altogether, cremation is progressing so favorably
everywhere that one may be hopeful that compara-
tively soon it will be adopted by every country in the
world.
Public opinion in England has undergone a wonder-
ful change, and now is universally in favor of crema-
tion. Even so great a newspaper as the Ti?nes, once a
vehement opponent of the reform, has come around,
and now upholds incineration.
The crematory belonging to the Cremation Society
of England, erected by them at St. John's, Woking,
Surrey, was made use of for the first time on the 26th
232 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
of March, 1885. The body upon which the rite was
performed was that of Mrs. Pickersgill, of London,
aged seventy-one — a lady well known in literary and
scientific circles. She had previously become a member
of the society, with a view of supporting the reform, in
which she took great interest. The form of declaration
drawn up by the society had been signed by her, and,
after the medical certificates had been duly filled up by
registered medical men and an application from a rep-
resentative of the deceased, the cremation was allowed
to proceed. An autopsy had been previously carried
out by the medical attendants of the deceased.
The body was conveyed to the crematory from
London in a suitable hearse ; and the cremation, which
lasted one hour, was attended by two friends of the
deceased, who expressed themselves perfectly satisfied
with the system employed. The cost for fuel was
under ten shillings altogether; and during the time of
the cremation, no smoke escaped from the chimney-
shaft, whilst the ashes were of a purest white and small
in volume.
The Italian government ordered the building of a
crematory, on the Gorini-Gozzi system, for the cholera
hospital at Varignano, which was completed in the
summer of 1885.
A crematorium was erected at Florence, on the
Venini system, which cremates a body in 70 min-
utes, and the cost of which was 4500 francs. Cremato-
ries are building at Pisa and Como.
On the 23d of June, 1885, the crematorium at
Livorno was dedicated with appropriate ceremonies.
It contains a Spaciani Mesmer furnace.
General acquiescence in the process of cremation is
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 233
steadily growing among us ; and I verily believe that
the time is not far distant when crematories will be
established in every state and territory of the Union.
The fact that one was recently erected in New York
City, one has been built at Lancaster, and one has just
been completed at Pittsburg, certainly proves that cre-
mation has found a foothold in this country.
The New York Cremation Society was organized in
the city of New York on March 8, 1881, under the
presidency of the Rev. Dr. J. D. Beugless, and was
incorporated on the 26th of March in the same year.
The objects and purposes of this society are to dissemi-
nate sound and enlightened views respecting the incin-
eration of the dead; to advocate and promote in every
proper and legitimate way the substitution of this
method for burial; and to advance the public good by
affording facilities for carrying cremation into opera-
tion. The members of the society consist of three
classes : active, associate, and corresponding members.
Active members are subdivided into annual and life
members, of whom the annual members pay the regular-
dues, and the life members the amount of $30 in
one sum. Those who have paid the regular dues
for twelve successive years also become life members.
No further payment is then required from such mem-
ber. These payments for twelve successive years
entitle an active member to all the privileges of the
society for the remainder of his life ; and an associate
member to the benefit of the incineration fund without
further charge.
Only active members are qualified for election or
appointment to any official position in the society ; to
vote at any election; and to debate and vote at any
234 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
meeting; corresponding members are chosen from among
those who have distinguished themselves by rendering
service in the promotion of cremation ; and they may
reside in any part of the world, except within a radius
of five miles around the city of New York. At present,
the New York Cremation Society numbers 470 mem-
bers, of whom 400 are active and 70 passive members.
The United States Cremation Company, incorporated
under the laws of the state of New York, is in no man-
ner connected with the New York Cremation Society,
although many members of the latter are stockholders
in the former. This company was founded for the pur-
pose of acquiring land, and erecting thereon the neces-
sary buildings, works, and other appliances for carrying
cremation into operation. It was incorporated under
the general business act of 1876 of the state of New
York, with a capital stock of 135,000, divided into 1400
shares of the par value of $25 per share; $28,200
worth of stock has already been taken. Among the
stockholders of the United States Cremation Company
are such persons of note as Andrew Carnegie, Professor
H. H. Boyesen, the distinguished author, Professor
Felix Adler, and Courtlandt Palmer.
Early in 1884, the company purchased a fine site on
Long Island, about 45 minutes' drive from the city. The
cremation temple was erected upon the summit of a hill
at Fresh Pond, Long Island. The site is bounded by
Olivet, Evelin, and Summit Avenues respectively on
the east, south, and west, and commands an unob-
structed view of the cities of New York and Brooklyn,
from the center of population in either of which it is
about five miles distant. It lies between two ceme-
teries. The grounds are high and picturesque. This
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 235
place of rest will be, if present plans are carried out,
more complete than anything of the kind in the world.
It is expressly wished to deprive it of the mournful
aspect usually associated with burial-grounds. To this
end there are no yew or willow trees, nor any emblems
of mourning. The grounds are tastefully laid out, and
adorned with flowers.
The corner-stone of the crematory at Fresh Pond
was laid on Nov. 20, 1884. Prof. Felix Adler conducted
the services, the principal speeches being made by him
and the Rev. Howard Henderson.
The directors of the United States Cremation Com-
pany fixed the charge for the incineration of bodies
at $25. The crematorium was finished in the latter
part of October, 1885. Experiments were made with
the bodies of a number of the lower animals, in
order to perfect the workings of the machinery. On
Nov. 10, 1885, a dressed ram, weighing 75 pounds,
together with the skin, shank, and hip bones of
an ox, was introduced into the furnace. With a
temperature of 2000° F. the incineration was completed
in two hours. A strong wind greatly retarded the pro-
cess by interfering with the draught of cold air. The
defect was remedied at once by altering the flues
and the insertion of a steam jet at a point above the
entrance of the flues.
The site was selected in order to carry out the first
plans of the edifice, which were those of a Grecian
temple. The plans have been modified and modernized
so that only a remnant of the classical design is left.
The front portion of the building will be, when finished,
two stories high. The rest of the structure is one
story high, and is built of plain red brick. The dimen-
236 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
sions are 38 X 74. Light is admitted to the interior of
the building by skylights in the roof, as well as by the
half-dozen windows on each side.
Cremation in New York has been advancing steadily,
although perhaps slowly, in public favor. The first
body was incinerated at Fresh Pond on Dec. 4, 1885,
and since then more than 100 persons have been cre-
mated there.
Cremation is spoken of with respect, and the stage
of smiling and joking over it in New York passed away
long ago.
It receives the unanimous support of the press and
the medical profession. The Society of Medical Juris-
prudence and State Medicine appointed early in 1886 a
committee to consider the subject. The report of that
committee, which was adopted, declared cremation to be
"a sanitary necessity," and recommended that all per-
sons dying of contagious diseases should be cremated
under direction of the medical authorities.
The cremation of Dr. Dio Lewis, the famous health
reformer, in the latter part of May, 1886, and that of
Mr. Henry Dodge, of one of the leading banking firms
on Wall Street, in the early part of June, attracted
wide attention.
The first one to advocate the adoption of cremation
in Buffalo, N. Y., was, to my knowledge, Dr. Frederick
Peterson, who championed the reform in an article
written for the Buffalo Medical „and Surgical Journal.
Many years passed, however, before his ardent advocacy
was followed by practical results. The Buffalo Crema-
tion Company (Limited) was incorporated in July, 1884,
under the law of 1875, — the so-called limited liability
act.
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 237
At a meeting held May 18, 1886, the first board of
directors was elected, with Dr. Charles Gary as presi-
dent. The gentlemen constituting this first board man-
aged the affairs of the company so well, and agreed
among themselves so perfectly, that they were re-
elected, and are still in office.
At this meeting committees were appointed on the
purchase of real estate for a suitable site for building a
crematorium, also for plans for the erection of a fur-
nace for the incineration of bodies. Subscriptions came
in rapidly, and those who had strong faith in the ulti-
mate accomplishment of this work were gratified by the
realization of their hopes. Any one who takes a look
at the crematorium of Buffalo to-day, must acknowl-
edge that the crematists of this city have a right to be
glad and proud to behold at last the practical outcome
of their work.
At a meeting of the board of directors in the early
part of August, 1885, the committees appointed for the
purpose rendered their reports in reference to a site for
a crematorium and a cinerary apparatus. In accord-
ance with these reports the directors purchased a site
on Delavan Avenue, near Delaware Avenue. The di-
mensions are 181 feet front, 161 feet rear, and 148 feet
in depth. The property was bought at a cost of $20
per foot, and on very favorable terms.
Originally the capital stock was $10,000, divided into
400 shares, of the par value of $25 per share. This
was afterward increased to $15,000, divided into 600
shares of the same par value. This stock when once
paid up is non-assessable, and not liable for the debts
of the company.
The Buffalo crematorium, which was finished re-
238 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
cently, is of a composite style of architecture, and is
constructed of Medina stone, with a slate roof. The
outline of the building is a pleasing one, and the archi-
tecture is of such a character that it resembles a church
more closely than a place where any mechanical opera-
tion is carried on. The grounds of the company are
entered from Delavan Avenue by a spacious roadway,
running to a porch and then passing around the build-
ing to the door of the mortuary chamber, on the east
side. Those who accompany the body alight at the
porch, and pass thence into the auditorium. The body
itself is removed from the hearse at the door of the
mortuary chamber.
When the coffin containing the body is received in
the mortuary chamber, the body is removed and placed
on the car which awaits its reception. The car is then
moved by machinery, and without noise, into the chan-
cel, where, if it is desired, the body may remain in sight
of those in the auditorium during the progress of such
service as the friends and relatives may wish to have
performed. At the proper time the same mechanism
moves the car noiselessly behind the doors which cut
off the incinerating room from the sight of the audi-
ence.
The building itself is some 70 feet in width, by
60 feet deep. The construction throughout is of
the most substantial character. The lot is graded and
seeded, and trees and shrubs were planted, so that the
appearance of the crematorium and its surroundings is
most pleasing to the eye.
On Dec. 20, 1883, Mr. John Storer Cobb, who was
one of the projectors and founders of the New York
Cremation Society and the United States Cremation
PKESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 239
Company, requested Bostonians (in the columns of a
leading newspaper) who were in favor of substituting
incineration for inhumation as a means of disposing of
the dead, to furnish him with their names and addresses.
After the receipt of these names he called a meeting,
CREMATORIUM AT LANCASTER, PA. (Interior View.)
which took place Jan. 24, 1884, and the result of which
was the organization of the New England Cremation
Society. Organization was effected under Chapter 115
of the Massachusetts Public Statutes; but the commis-
sioner of corporations refusing to allow such incorpora-
tion, the society not wishing to organize under the
general corporation law, whereby the par value of
240 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
shares must be $100, and all stock subscribed for and
paid in before it could commence operations, applied
for a special charter, embodying its views and needs.
But the time for the introduction of new business
having expired,, it was obliged to wait till the next
session of the legislature. Early in the session it pre-
sented a bill for incorporation, which took the form of
a general law, authorizing the formation of cremation
societies.
It was the intention of the society to at once incor-
porate under this act, place the stock of the society on
sale, and as soon as possible erect a crematorium in the
near vicinity of Boston. The bill passed both houses
of the legislature, but was amended, so that now the
par value of shares must be either $10 or $50, and, as
under the general corporation law of Massachusetts, the
whole capital stock must be subscribed and paid in
before the society can commence operations.
The capital stock of the society is $25,000, distributed
into 2500 shares, each of the par value of $10. At
present the society numbers about 75 members. The
officers are : John Storer Cobb, president ; Charles
A. Holt, treasurer ; and Sidney P. Brown, secre-
tary.
Inspired with the necessity of a better method of
disposing of the dead, Dr. John O. Marble began the
agitation of the question in Worcester, Mass., in
November, 1884, by reading a paper upon the subject
before 25 of the most prominent physicians of that
city. Much to his surprise and pleasure they heartily
approved of the plan of cremation as a substitute for
the present time-honored, but, to the living, dangerous
custom of earth-burial. At the solicitation of one of
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 241
them, who is the enthusiastic president of the Worces-
ter Natural History Society, the doctor delivered a
lecture upou the subject of the " Disposal of the Dead,
Cremation Preferred," before a large audience in the
hall of the society on the evening of Dec. 4, 1884.
The people of the conservative city of Worcester
seemed to appreciate the sanitary necessity, and began
intelligent inquiries, which Dr. Marble answered in
eight communications in the Worcester Daily Spy. The
movement was favored by almost all of the best citi-
zens, and, after considerable hard work on Dr. Marble's
part, took shape in the organization of a society. The
constitution was signed by, and the society is composed
of, persons of the very highest position, socially, pro-
fessionally, and in every respect. The society is not
yet quite ready for the erection of a erern?,- -j- y, but it
is expected that such result will follow in the near
future.
The Cincinnati Cremation Company was incoiporated
on Oct. 18, 1884 ; it was organized two or three weeks
later. The capital stock of the company is $25,000,
divided into 1000 shares of the par value of $25 per
share. No member is permitted to own more than
20 shares. In the spring of 1885, the company
purchased a site for the erection of Cincinnati's cre-
matorium. The site is on a commanding eminence on
Dixmyth Avenue, west of Burnet Woods and within a
quarter of a mile of the terminus of the Clifton line
of cars. The property is within city limits ; it is
easily accessible, being on a fine drive ; its elevation
will give the crematorium a distinguished prominence,
while the view to the west and south is extended and
beautiful. The front measurement of the site is some-
242 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
what over 300 feet, with a depth of 350, comprising an
area of more than two and a half acres, at a cost of
$4000. The basement of the Cincinnati crematorium
has been finished; the furnace is being erected, and
will be completed in a short time. At present, the
company counts 325 stockholders, with quite a repre-
sentation of ladies. About $15,000 of the stock has
been subscribed for.
A crematory on Sixth Avenue, in the centre of the
city of Pittsburg, Pa., was completed in January,
1886. The furnace (constructed by Dr. M. L. Davis)
is heated by natural gas to at least 2200 degrees.
The apparatus is owned by Mr. H. Samson, the ex-
president of the National Funeral Directors' Asso-
ciation, who is a wide-awake man, and thinks the
funeral directors (vulgo, undertakers) are very short-
sighted to allow cremation associations to be organ-
ized ; they should be willing and prepared to take care
of and make such disposition of the dead as the people
want. The use of natural gas enables Mr. Samson to
have his furnace in the basement of his business house.
The first cremation in this apparatus took place on
March 17, 1886, when the remains of Milton Fisher, of
Columbus, O., were incinerated. The body was placed
in the retort at 7.30 o'clock, and in less than an hour
was reduced to ashes. This was the first time that
natural gas had ever been used for cremating purposes ;
and its advantages were apparent at once.
The National Cremation Association, which was or-
ganized and incorporated Feb. 10, 1883, has so far
met with success, as its object to make propaganda
for the principle of cremation and keep its ideas before
the eyes of the public has been fully sustained, as the
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 243
discussions and arguments pro and contra in the press
of Philadelphia, Pa., where it is located, will prove.
According to its constitution, this association agrees to
cremate the remains of any active or passive member in
good standing at death, when so desired. The expenses
of the funeral and cremation are carried by the asso-
ciation.
Since the incorporation of this society, one of its
members died, May 10, 1884, and was, in accordance
with his wishes, cremated. The body was transferred
to Washington, Pa., on the 13th of the same month,
and there reduced to ashes, which were returned to
the care of the family of the deceased.
Since the incorporation of the association, the number
of members has risen from six to 59 and will soon,
no doubt, be a fall hundred.
It is now the main object of this association to secure
the erection of a crematory in or near Philadelphia.
For this purpose subscriptions were received and stock
issued. As soon as the necessary capital is obtained
the crematorium will be built.
In the medical school of the University of Pennsyl-
vania the bodies which have been utilized for dissec-
tion are burned instead of being buried as heretofore.
The Lancaster Cremation and Funeral Reform So-
ciety at Lancaster, Pa., originated in this wise : Early
in 1884, a few gentlemen interested in the matter agi-
tated it among their friends ; and a list of members of
a proposed society was made. On May 27, these sub-
scribers met at the office of Messrs. Steinmann and
Hensel (both of whom were members), and, calling
D. G. Eshleman to the chair, a temporary organization
was effected. A committee was appointed to report on
244 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
a proper location for a crematory, also a committee
on charter and by-laws. These committees reported
June 6, when the amount of stock was fixed at $5000
in |10 shares.
At the third meeting, June 13, a permanent organiza-
tion was effected by electing a board of directors.
The board organized immediately upon the adjourn-
ment of the stockholders' meeting, and chose D. G.
Eshleman, Esq., president; Dr. Henry Carpenter and
Rev. J. Max Hark, vice-presidents ; J. D. Pyott, clerk ;
H. C. Brubaker, Esq., corresponding secretary ; Geo.
K. Reed, treasurer. Mr. Middleton was placed on the
committee on ground and building in place of Mr.
Hensel, whose engagements prevented his acting; and
this committee was instructed to report June 20, at
which time the site now occupied was selected and the
committee ordered to purchase. On the 30th of June,
the stock subscribed was called in, and building pro-
posals asked for. On the 11th of July, bids were
opened ; on the 14th of July, the contract was awarded
to Mr. Dinkelberg, and the building was immediately
begun. On the 10th of September, the building was
completed; and the retort builders having failed to
come to time, the committee were authorized to con-
struct one on plans of their own. This was done; for
Dr. M. L. Davis devised and built a furnace from his
own designs, and on Nov. 1 the board met in the cre-
matory building, and provided for the improvement of
the grounds.
On the night of Nov. 4 or the morning of the
5th, the furnace went to white heat, despite predictions
of experts to the contrary, and justified the plan of con-
struction. On the evening of the 17th of November,
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 245
the body of a sheep, two ox-heads, and several sheep-
heads were enclosed in a wooden box and placed in the
retort at red heat, the company present being unwilling
to remain later. Some smoke, of course, was made ; but
when white heat was reached, the cremation was per-
fect, as specimens of the residuum amply proved.
The crematorium was dedicated on Tuesday, Nov.
25, at 2 p.m., when the body of a lady from Jersey
City, N. J., was incinerated. It must be remembered
that this society was organized on May 27, 1884, pur-
chased land, erected its building, and had its first cre-
mation within the period of six months, while several
other societies organized much earlier had not yet ad-
vanced much beyond laying the corner-stones of their
respective buildings.
The dedication exercises were opened by a prayer
by Rev. Geo. Gaul, of St. Paul's Methodist Church.
Thereupon, the building was delivered to the society
by Dr. M. L. Davis, chairman of the building com-
mittee, who discussed the subject of cremation from a
sanitary standpoint.
The next oration, preceding the benediction, was
delivered by Rev. J. Max Hark, pastor of the Moravian
church, one of the vice-presidents of the society, who
treated the subject from a theological standpoint.
The benediction over, the participants in the dedica-
tion ceremony dispersed. The incineration that took
place on this occasion was entirely satisfactory.
The whole ceremony was solemn, and produced a
profound impression upon the intelligent and thought-
ful audience, among whom were many guests from
other cities.
The rules of the Lancaster Cremation and Funeral
246 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
Reform Association are very stringent and well calcu-
lated to meet all demands. All applicants for crema-
tion of bodies must present a certificate of death, signed
by the physician attending during the last illness, whose
standing as a reputable practitioner must be attested by
a magistrate or notary public. When brought from
a distance, official board of health papers are also re-
quired. The rules request that the body should be
dressed in a shroud of cotton or linen fabric ; all metal-
lic substances being avoided — hooks, buttons with
metallic eyes, etc. The body should be enclosed in a
plain wooden coffin ; or, what is preferable, in a coffin
made of sheet zinc. The cost of incineration is $25.
The condition, financial and otherwise, of the society
is excellent. Mr. H. C. Brubaker started the subscrip-
tion shortly after Dr. Gross's demise, and succeeded in
getting some 50 subscribers before organization. The
society now numbers about 80 members, of the best
thinking element in the community, male and female.
So far, 51 cremations have taken place in the Lan-
caster furnace, every one of them to the entire satisfac-
tion of all concerned.
Recently a second furnace was put in the Lancaster
crematorium ; and some important improvements were
made by Dr. Davis in the process which was invented
by him.
A single feature of the earlier incinerations seemed
out of harmony with the character of the occasion —
it was necessary to force the receptacle with the body
into the retort by direct pressure. This was sought to
be remedied by drawing it in by a wire cable ; but the
latter proving unreliable, the body, enclosed in the
alum-saturated cloth, is now laid in a cradle consisting
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 247
of a steel frame covered with asbestos and fire-clay,
which is suspended from an extension arm, operated by
a quick-thread screw extending lengthwise of the cata-
falque, by which the cradle is placed silently in the
retort and the arm withdrawn. The incineration being
completed, by reversing the process the cradle with the
ashes is extracted intact and allowed to cool.
It is to be remembered that these Lancaster people
had almost everything to learn. Dr. Le Moyne, of
glorious memory, had devoted his labors to teaching
the principle by precept and example ; his method was
necessarily primitive and crude. Lancaster added the
required art, gave the principle an adequate process,
and sent forth the body of truth suitably clothed. The
record of their first cremation was published, with all
sorts of comment, in every live paper of the land ; and
the impetus then given to the cause of reform, while it
cannot be fully estimated, is plainly seen in the wonder-
ful development of correct thought and sentiment on
this subject which immediately followed.
In the list of persons cremated at Lancaster, the Ger-
man element largely predominates ; and practically the
whole list is made up of residents in cities — showing
that the centers of culture are also the nuclei of ad-
vanced thought on this question. Nor is this crema-
torium altogether without honor in its own country.
One of the prominent members of the society (George
Brubaker, Esq.) dying since its establishment, was in-
cinerated; also Ex-Mayor Christian Kieff'er, of Lancaster,
and both parents of Mrs. H. C. Brubaker. The society
is extremely fortunate in its personnel ; from its presi-
dent, a leading lawyer, its vice-presidents, in the front
rank of medicine and divinity ; its directors, active men
248 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
in all walks of life, the high school principal, leading
journalists, bankers, managers of large business enter-
prises, the medical profession largely represented in the
rank and file of its 80 members — its position in the
community is assured, and its radical doctrine finds the
most solid of "backing."
The cremation society of New Orleans, La., was
organized and incorporated on the 14th of Febru-
ary, 1884. It was established mainly through the
efforts of Dr. Felix Formento. It was founded to
ascertain and demonstrate, by scientific research and
investigation, the importance and necessity of incinera-
tion to society as the best method of disposing of the
bodies of the dead ; and in pursuance thereof to make
known to the people the dangers to public health
resulting from the mode of burial generally practiced
all over the country, more particularly the special
clangers to a city like New Orleans, from the peculiar
method followed there ; to demonstrate the advantage
of cremation over all other modes of disposing of the
dead, in a sanitary, social, and economical point of
view ; to remove all prejudices which there may be
against the introduction of cremation in the Crescent
City, and to prove that cremation can be practiced with-
out in the least wounding religious sentiment or sus-
ceptibilities ; to obtain information in regard to the
different methods ; to obtain, if necessary, proper legis-
lative enactments on the subject of incineration, pro-
viding for the disposal of bodies, especially those whose
death resulted from contagious or infectious diseases,
and especially in small-pox hospitals and other public
institutions ; to procure necessary funds for the erection
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 249
of a crematorium in the city of New Orleans, and for
its management under proper sanitary regulations.
I regret to say that this society is no longer in exist-
ence. It went to the dogs on account of the apathy of
the people of New Orleans. It started out with good
prospects of success ; a square of ground was even
bought near the city, and it was thought that a furnace
for the burning of the dead would be built without
delay. But gradually the interest in cremation lessened
in the Crescent City and, in consequence, the society
went into liquidation.
At St. Louis, Mo., the propaganda in favor of crema-
tion was carried on for years by Dr. Luedeking, who
died, and was reduced to ashes in the Lancaster crema-
tory. Thereupon the robes of an agitator for incinera-
tion' were donned by Mr. Oscar Hoef er of the Westliche
Post, an influential German journal, and Rev. Jonas,
both of whom kept the interest in cremation alive by
delivering lectures on the subject and by contributing
articles to the daily press.
The Missouri Crematory Association was organized
in the early part of 1885 for the purpose of providing
and establishing in the city of St. Louis, a suitable
building and other facilities for the cremation of the
dead, and for the proper preservation of their ashes in
a columbarium. The capital stock is $25,000, divided
into 1000 shares of $25 each, ten per cent of which
amount must be deposited by the subscriber immediately
upon signing. Non-residents may become members of
the association, and, for the purpose of cremation, the
bodies not only from this city or state, but also from
other states and locations may be received.
From the beginning the association encountered a
250 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
great deal of opposition. This was so strong that once
the advisability of disbanding was seriously discussed.
All agreeing, however, that it was too great a pity to
abandon a project, for the execution of which there was
enough capital on hand, concluded not to disorganize
and to make more strenuous efforts to overcome the
prejudice prevailing in the city council and among the
citizens.
This proved to be temporary, for a bill, prohibiting
cremation within the city limits, was repealed recently
by both houses of the city council of St. Louis, and
only awaits the signature of the mayor to become a law.
The association bought no less lhan three lots. With
the last one, not very desirable in location, they are at
length gaining success. When they had bought the
first lot, the building commission issued a building per-
mit to them, for which they had to pay $5. After
this, however, the municipal council enacted a law for-
bidding them to make use of that very permit, by pro-
hibiting cremation. And the $5 were never returned
to them.
The association is in a prosperous condition, and will
proceed at once, as soon as the present obstacles are
removed, to carry out the objects for which it was
founded.
The First Cremation Society of San Francisco was
incorporated on the 17th of February, 1882, with
53 members. The directors of this society are:
E. D. Wheeler, president; S. Heydenfelt, Jr., vice-
president; E. A. Denicke, treasurer; Max Levy, re-
cording secretary; George E. Voelkel, corresponding
secretary ; H. A. Cobb, J. Bayer, M.D., F. Schuene-
mann-Pott, Dr. Wozencroft.
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 251
The law of the state of California provides only for
the disposal of the dead by burial ; therefore the society
is now making the greatest efforts to induce the legis-
lature to enact a law authorizing cremation, leaving the
people free to choose as to the disposal of their dead
between the two methods.
At the last annual meeting of the society, the secre-
tary stated that the society now numbers 113 members, of
which six are ladies. One of the original members
died, another left the society, which makes an increase
in membership of 62 persons.
The Sau Francisco Cremation Company was incor-
porated on the 10th of September, 1885, with 117
stockholders, representing 214 shares at $50. The
capital stock is $25,000, divided into 500 shares of
$50 each. The object of the company is to erect a
suitable crematorium for the immense population of
the great city at the Golden Gate.
A lot has been purchased, and a crematorium will be
erected capable of incinerating 40 bodies a day. The
officers of this company are : Judge E. D. Wheeler,
president; S. Henderfelt, Jr., vice-president; Max Levy,
temporary treasurer and recording secretary; George
E. Voelkel, corresponding secretary ; C. W. Banks,
General Cobb, E. O. Denicke, W. T. Trelan, Jr.
A cremation company was organized at Los Angeles,
Cal., in the early part of September, 1885, with 152
members, of which 12 are ladies. This company
intends to build a crematorium as soon as $6000 have
been subscribed.
Cremation companies were also recently founded at
Sacramento and Stockton, Cal.
The Davenport (Iowa) Cremation Society was formed
252 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
on the 17th of February, 1885, and is still in existence.
It counts about 120 members. It was founded to
"enlighten the people on the subject of cremation."
The annual dues are $1.
The Northwestern Cremation Society of Davenport
may be regarded as an offspring of the above. At a
meeting held in April, 1885, a committee was appointed
to obtain subscriptions for the purpose of building a
crematorium. The committee reported May 6 that 100
shares, at $25 a share, had been subscribed. At this
meeting a committee was instructed to draft articles of
incorporation, to be acted upon at a future meeting;
and another committee was appointed to ascertain the
cost of cremation furnaces. The committee reported
on June 30; and the stockholders then proceeded to
elect the directors of the organization. On the 3d of
July, the board of directors elected the officers: H. H.
Andresen, president; C. Stoltenberg, vice-president;
F. G. Clausen, secretary; F. T. Blunck, treasurer.
The capital stock of this company is $25,000, divided
into 1000 shares of $25 each. The stock is payable at
such time or times as the board of directors may deter-
mine. Four thousand three hundred and fifty dollars
have already been subscribed. A committee has been
appointed to purchase a lot, and the crematorium will
probably be erected in the course of this year.
In the spring of 1885, several citizens of San An-
tonio, Tex., circulated a list which read as follows: —
"We, the undersigned, believing cremation the proper,
most healthful, and most satisfactory method of dispos-
ing of our dead, do therefore sign our names hereto, with
the expectation of forming ourselves into a society, the
immediate object of which will be the erection of a
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 253
crematorium in this city." This circular was signed by
95 persons, ladies as well as gentlemen.
A meeting was then called. At this gathering, three
committees were appointed : one to obtain a charter,
one to prepare the constitution and by-laws, and one,
finally, to get subscriptions.
The latter made the round of the city with the fol-
lowing agreement : —
" We, the undersigned, do hereby agree to become
members of the cremation society now being formed
in San Antonio, Bexar County, Tex. Each of the un-
dersigned hereby agrees to pay 50 cents down, as a
contribution to the fund for defraying the preliminary
expense in forming the society."
This list was signed by 107 persons of both sexes, and
|53 were collected to pay for printing, etc.
After this, another meeting was called in the latter
part of May, and the company organized permanently.
The organization is called the "San Antonio Crema-
tion Company," and has the following officers: E. B.
Hadra, M.D., president ; M. F. Corbett, vice-presi-
dent; F. Groos, banker, treasurer; A. Maverick, sec-
retary.
The company was incorporated on the 18th of June,
1885. The amount of the capital stock of this corpora-
tion is $50,000, divided into 5000 shares, of the par
value each of $10. So far, 11480 have been subscribed
by 60 shareholders.
An acre of land was donated to the company by
Mr. A. Maverick. It lies east of the city, on a hill, in
the neighborhood of the cemeteries ; but the property
lies east of them, so that the east and southeast trade
winds, which blow in San Antonio during the summer,
254 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
reach the place first, and, consequently, do not fetch
any bad odor from the graveyards.
The grounds will be beautifully laid out and planted
with trees and shrubs in the near future. The view
from this site is very fine. Toward the north may be
seen the government depot, with all its stately buildings,
about two miles off; toward the east and southeast is
visible a beautiful valley terminated in the distance by
the picturesque blue mountains.
In the beginning the company was opposed by a
Baptist preacher, who was soon silenced by the follow-
ing declaration in one of the daily newspapers : —
"I have no doubt but that my good old Christian
friend is in this world for doing good ; but, by opposing
cremation, he not only does harm to us all as long as
he lives, but continues to injure us after he is dead and
buried," etc.
The cremation movement in the state of Michigan
was begun by the author of this volume immediately
after he returned from the incineration of his mother.
By repeated newspaper articles I continued to awaken
a lively interest in the reform at Detroit, and was sup-
ported in my undertaking by all the leading newspapers
of the city ; even a publication only a few days old de-
claring in favor of cremation. None but the purely
religious journals opposed the scheme. On the 7th of
August, 1885, a meeting was held at a public hall in
the City of the Straits, for the purpose of discussing the
question of cremation and of forming a cremation so-
ciety. The meeting was well attended, nearly 100
persons being present. Dr. J. H. Carstens was chosen
chairman, and Dr. H. Erichsen as secretary. The meet-
ing was opened by Dr. J. H. Carstens. Two plans, he
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 255
said, had been proposed for the consideration of crema-
tionists ; one of these was the building of a crematory,
the other, the formation of a society, each member of
which would pledge himself to provide for the incinera-
tion of his body.
I then made the address of the evening, giving the
main arguments for incineration as opposed to earth-
burial. My statements were followed by remarks of
a similar nature, made by several of the gentlemen
present.
A motion was then made by Dr. J. E. Emerson, a
prominent physician, that the chairman appoint a com-
mittee of three to prepare a constitution and by-laws
for the organization of a cremation society in Detroit ;
and three gentlemen were appointed as such committee.
The following agreement was thereupon prepared, and
received 27 signatures : —
"We, the undersigned, do hereby unite ourselves
into an association for the purpose of providing facili-
ties for carrying cremation into operation." Then the
meeting adjourned, subject to the call of the committee.
The entire time of the committee was taken up by
the formation of a stock company, which proposes the
erection of a crematory. Influenced by flattering pros-
pects, the promoters of the project had prepared by
Messrs. Spiers and Rohns, architects, plans for a hand-
some crematorium. The chart shows three divisions,
viz. : the exterior of the building, the main floor, and
the basement.
The exterior view shows a handsome Romanesque
structure of one story and a basement. The main
height is 16 feet, which rises in four gables on the sides.
A dome, 35 feet in circumference, attains a h eight cf
256
CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
65 feet. The drawing of the first floor shows an audi-
torium of octagon form. Back of the two rear niches
are dressing-rooms for clergymen. Two handsome altars
on which to hold religious services will front from these
niches. Two rooms in the lower end of the building,
^f\EIV]ATOF^UJVJ
LANcy\S7EF\
CREMATORIUM AT LANCASTER, PA. (Exterior View.)
on either side of the approach, are reserved for toilet
rooms, one for ladies, and the other for gentlemen. In
the center of the upper end of the auditorium is placed
a catafalque, resting on an elevator. After a body has
been properly prepared, it will be placed on this cata-
falque. When the religious services are concluded, the
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 257
body will be lowered to the basement, and the opening
in the floor closed with a slide trap.
The plan of the basement shows the same divisions
as are made on the main floor. On the left-hand side
is a retiring-room. The front is divided into four
rooms. An ice cellar, a frigiclarium, which is calcu-
lated as a place in which to preserve bodies for several
days; a calidarium, a heated room in which bodies can
be placed for several days, to insure against cremation
while in a state of trance ; and a drug room, where
restoratives will be kept. The right-hand wing is de-
signed for a preparing room, from which the body is
taken directly to one of the furnaces. The furnaces, of
which there will be two, are not yet definitely designed.
It is supposed, however, that thej^ will be after the plan
of the apparatuses at Lancaster, in Pennsylvania.
In the rear of the building it is proposed to build an
addition, in the form of a three-quarter circle, which
will be styled the columbarium. On the inside this
will be divided by three corridors, and the walls divided
into compartments for containing urns. There will be
room in this limited space of 40 X 30 feet, it is estimated,
for holding the remains of 8000 bodies.
The building is designed to be built of Ionia red
sandstone. Two immense flue chimneys, one for venti-
lation, the other for the furnaces, rising to a height of
75 feet, will give character to the building. The front
will be set off with a handsome porch supported by
Roman pillars and approached by a half-circle road-bed,
over which the hearse and carriages can drive up to the
main entrance.
The Michigan Cremation Association was organized
at Detroit on the 31st of March, 1886. Dr. H. Ericbsen
258 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
was chosen temporary chairman, and Mr. A. N. Low-
secretary of the meeting. The documents of incorpora-
tion were signed. On motion of Dr. J. H. Carstens, a
board of directors was elected. At the close of the
meeting the directors met, and elected the following
officers : President, James F. Noyes, M.D. ; vice-presi-
dent, Hugo Erichsen, M.D. ; secretary, Mr. A. N. Low ;
treasurer, Mr. M. W. Field. The treasurer furnished
a $10,000 bond, as required by the original agreement.
The subject of cremation was first, agitated at Balti-
more, Md., in the winter of 1884, by Dr. G. W. Leh-
mann and Mr. J. R. Rennous, who were also the
originators of the cremation company in that city. In
1884, two public meetings were held ; but they were
poorly attended, and the prospects gloomy in the ex-
treme. But the two advocates of incineration worked
steadily on until their efforts were crowned with suc-
cess. The Cremation Cemetery Company of Baltimore
City was incorporated on the 30th of March, 1885,
with a capital stock of $15,000, divided into 600 shares
of the par value of $25 per share. At a meeting of the
stockholders the following officers were elected: B. F.
Horwitz, president; J. R. Rennous, secretary; J. W.
Middendorf, treasurer. The founders of the organiza-
tion were obliged to call it " Cremation Cemetery Co.,"
to comply with the general laws of Maryland in obtain-
ing the charter. $9000 worth of stock has already been
taken up, and the company expects to make such head-
way that it will be able to build soon.
When the La Crosse (Wisconsin) Cremation Society
was founded in the middle of October, 1885, with Mr.
John Pamperin as president, it resolved upon a full in-
vestigation of the subject of incineration and appointed
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 259
a committee to get reports from other societies. Tliis
committee having performed its work, a meeting of the
committee was held at the residence of Mr. Gustav Carl,
and these reports read, arranged, and discussed. The
report from Detroit was particularly exhaustive. Daven-
port also furnished a report. The cremation society
there had sent a representative to Lancaster, Pa., who
had examined the cremation furnace there and had pre-
pared a report, of which La Crosse was given the bene-
fit. The result of the conference was that a resolution
was adopted calling for a meeting of stockholders at an
early date for permanent organization. The La Crosse
Cremation Association filed articles of incorporation
with the secretary of state on the 26th of November,
1885. The purpose of the association is to dispose of
human bodies after death, by cremation, and it shall
continue its business for 20 years, unless the holders
of two-thirds of the stock consent to the dissolution of
the association. Mr. J. Pamperin is the president, Mr.
G. Carl, secretary, and Mr. J. Ulrich the treasurer of
the association. A person wishing to become a member
of this association may subscribe for one or more shares
of #25 each (not exceeding 50 shares) of the capital
stock of the association, which is limited to $8000. The
shares so subscribed shall be paid in instalments. The
first instalment must be paid at the time of subscription,
and the balance in instalments, as called for by the direc-
tors, within one year thereafter; but none shall be
called for until three months after the other. If any of
the subscribers should die before the projected crema-
torium has been erected, and the deceased should have
expressed a wish to have his body cremated, and pro-
vision is made by him or his family for the expenses in-
260 CREMATION OF THE DEAD.
cident thereto, the officers of the society shall see that
his will in this respect be carried out at the nearest
convenient crematory.
The Kentucky Cremation Society, at Louisville, which
was organized in the fall of 1886, has been steadily
growing, and now counts about 70 members. The sub-
scribed capital is sufficient to buy a lot and commence
building, and the society therefore hopes to have a cre-
matory ready during next year.
A license was issued on Jan. 2, 1886, to William
Christian, of the Chicago Tribune, Elmer Atkinson,
a lawyer, and David Hamilton, a real estate dealer, to
build a crematery for the incineration of human bodies,
near Chicago, Illinois. The capital of the company
which they have organized, and which is called the
" Chicago and Cook County Cremation Company," is
140,000.
On April 6, 1886, Dr. O. W. Carlson read a paper
advocating cremation, before the Academy of Medicine,
at Milwaukee, Wis. At the close of the address the
subject was discussed at some length by those present,
and some very interesting facts were brought out. A
proposition was made that the Academy of Medicine
found a cremation society at Milwaukee, and, though
no action in the matter was taken at the time, it is
probable that steps will be taken by the members with
that object in view.
Lately a cremation society was organized at Milwau-
kee, that has already secured a desirable site upon a
local cemetery, and intends to erect a crematorium as
soon as the necessary funds are obtained.
It is proposed to build a crematory at Toronto, Can-
ada. The pastors of the leading churches, upon being
PBESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 261
interviewed, almost unanimously expressed their oppo-
sition to cremation.
The newspapers state that a crematory will be erected
at Atlanta, Ga.
This volume would not be complete without the
mention of the Modern Crematist, a monthly journal
devoted to the interests of incineration, and published
by Dr. M. L. Davis of Lancaster, Pa. The Neue
Flamme, a worthy German contemporary, is published
at Berlin.
My native country was always eager to embrace de-
serving reforms ; there is no reason why it should not
adopt the superior system of incineration. Nay, I think
it will become the standard-bearer of this sanitary refor-
mation, and march in the avant-guard of this signal
progress. The subject of incineration is already awak-
ening much interest among us, as is evinced by a recent
sermon of that eminent New York divine, Rev. Heber
Newton, who spoke strongly in favor of the substitution
of cremation for sepulture. He said the mode of dis-
posing of the dead human body was only a form, and
that mode was best which was best for the living. In
England, only a few years ago, a dignitary of the na-
tional church dared to assert that cremation endangered
the belief in the life to come. He knew, or ought to
have known, that the same process of combustion is
surely carried on, whether in the ground or in the cre-
matory, and that if dissolution of the body imperiled
the true doctrine of resurrection, then that doctrine
was long ago hopelessly lost. These words from the
lips of a famous American preacher are certainly proof
that the antagonism of the clergy to cremation is wan-
ing.
262 CEEMATION OF THE DEAD.
There are other signs of approaching day. I refer to
the constant discussion of incineration in the columns
of the daily press, and to the fact that cremation was
lately brought to the attention of the American Medical
Association, while it met at St. Louis, Mo., on the 6th
of May. The report of a special committee, appointed
the year before, was read by its chairman, Dr. J. M.
Keller, of Arkansas. The committee moved to amend
the original resolution so as to read: —
Resolved, That cremation or incineration of the dead
has become a sanitary necessity in populous cities, and
that the Association advises its adoption.
The Association adopted the amendment by a vote
of 159 to 106.
Cremation was also endorsed by the American Public
Health Association at its last meeting.
I rejoice at the thought that most writers on the
momentous subject of incineration were medical men.
Who, indeed, would be better qualified for such a task
than the man who may daily witness the pernicious
effect which the dead exercise over the living.
Those who are friends of the reform should come out
openly in its favor. Crematists who are on the fence,
or who, perhaps, hide back of it, might just as well keep
out of the combat between cremation and interment
altogether ; we have no use for them. If you believe
in cremation, candidly say so, and tell your friends why
you believe in it. Moral cowards do a just cause more
harm than good. Those who have tried to propagate
the idea of cremation in an underhand way have invari-
ably failed ; the public must be brought face to face
with the question : cremation or burial ? To spread the
PRESENT STATE OF THE CREMATION QUESTION. 263
reform in this country, I hope to see, before long, the
birth of an American cremation association, to be com-
posed of delegates from the various cremation societies
of the United States. There is already a sufficient
number of societies for the formation of a vigorous
organization of the kind, that would undoubtedly aid
greatly the progress of the reform.
This, then, finishes what I had to say about a hygienic
reform that will be the leading one in the latter part of
the nineteenth century. There will be a long and warm
controversy before the people will generally abandon a
custom of such antiquity as earth-burial ; but cremation
will supersede it in the end. The present style of
burial does not do any one any good. On the contrary,
it destroys hundreds, perhaps thousands, of lives every
year. A good many deaths due to graveyard gases or
water contamination by cemetery effluvia escape obser-
vation, since the real cause of the decease is seldom sus-
pected. Incineration, however, does nobody any harm,
and is in accord with the humane and progressive spirit
of the age. Disadvantages it has none ; and with the
many arguments in its favor, it cannot fail to come out
of the battle between torch and spade victorious in
every respect. Moreover, it has the generous support
of the scientists, physicians, and sanitarians of the times,
which alone assures success.
I close this volume with a prediction which will soon
be realized, namely, that cremation will make more prog-
ress in the United States than in any other country of
the world. Indeed, the progression will be so rapid
that old Europe will open its eyes wide in blank aston-
ishment, and wonder how it is possible. When we
264 CKEMATION OF THE DEAD.
Americans once perceive the advantages and superiority
of a reformation, we do not hesitate long to adopt it ;
and the time will come when incineration will be custo-
mary in the Union, and interment obsolete.