Skip to main content

Full text of "The cotton plant in Egypt, studies in physiology and genetics"

See other formats


LA, 


a ie, 
te 


(tee 


Se 
Sats 

ae 
DEPP 
RseHestsecs) 
See ae iae 


cath 


es 
5, Ps 
Seeaeas 


Apt 


ae 


Soe 
Neen 
2 


Ss 
. 


Gas? 
s? 


SORES 
Sa 


Sete 


oh 
ENP aTN 
ateietsecase 


mentehe 
Racer 


eet 


NAN 
or, seis 
Oe 
siete 


RH 


as 


Was 


= 


* 
ARRAS 


is 

eee 
ad 
set, 


ae 
seen 
RR RRRR 


ety 


av 


= rt ahh 
Pet tp eabs 


sett 


babe ha te 
».t 


he oy 
saeco ee 
Se 


< 
¢ 


isi pivar 
ssesaeaneegs 
eens 


ant 
Seateseetes 
Leesa 


ees 


Shetatptetacatabetarsterscys 
2Satahatnanestaredaeeta erat 
DederszenereRitate renee soeateeh Regitate 
SUP DDORS DAE DeBEDE DEE DeaL ID beeda ated 
RnSeancnssS asede 


¥ 
Ncaesase saya) 
SNS 


Steet 
aeeedeatate 


s 


G 
Sth 
Sesaleseheieiahe 
RRR H IT ei 
BE Eeesteeteesitesescetsisoues aie 
Ferrers reeatye ai) NSS didi este, eee 
eeseeieosnacrenenreatieenctietiserien negra derapanspar5 025 
oDbarbprasvsvdedaroprpnosniyareorn HES 
eSeiateceeacttens bee eS tseresess Bereta ogee aPez eas: 
4 Meateiaee Seatesaus sareteetaericreiticieieet ieee 
Spot achese 
SREP ah 
35) 
252525) 
pease 
HeLee 
>On eee 
HS 
Hseiey 


‘9 
ies erase} 


eSeSte4 eaSasaieseneie 
SENSIN Coed rts ease 


RX DEosepor rg rgoeren 
ee ene 
tS HcSet 
‘S aseeses 
bee eeesere 


352525292; ee 2528252 “ 
DPS25 PSN > 14 7! 7 ate Beers eae 
easersareaeiieseies iatatotetatatate Ay 
Bb Pe dgrapaphanren 03 Sees Seadaseeat tetris vty 
Rates oa st recess 
3595: eeseseraatae 
DIMA IE I DIN L ee 


False ses 
Liset 


eee 

Peaeeteiets 

o OCDE DEDEDE OED oCaT: 

229595: oy she 

Bappeaepeaede 
ee Oatatetetats 
estoy trol ot beats o oe: 
C0010 140.0 161018 eG ee 
a pebeaeasentncnerspanens 
racuineean 

Reiseeatserenls 


23% Seis 
Dra oo rto) vere zeasegra regen? 
tetstet ttt those setae aie 
33 eeianetereresaeereeese 
Sesataranausatsianes ss 
eerstievere 
Uieieiaaleteaictes 
Matted he 
Ss 
es 


Eee if 
tSeieeceess ie 
2 
irs 
i : 
Aes nates aee 
MSA Sei ise ie Ses 
Serarelerererextie7 
eteeaes 
s 


4 
ciao 


he 
pete 
ha neat 
ees se aah 
bids ote 


N 


ie 
OSE 


fe totase 
7 7 


SS 
behets 


Seat 


EO OS 


he 
Stok 
NS 
. 
sees) 
x 


IME OU ON ECE CES 
eh 
eS 
at 
eh 


SEES 
SS 


S 
SS 


ws 


Led A 
tM eg 
EEE 


eae 


ae 
o¢, 


Saas 


SERS 
* 


oe 
WS: 


x 


MEMES 
ae 
if. 


SEA GA 
ide eae 


SES 
SS 


SES 
Sk 


, 


oe 
a 


v 


Cornell University 


Library 


OF THE 


Mew Work State College of Agriculture 


584 


innit 


Cornell University 


Library 


The original of this book is in 
the Cornell University Library. 


There are no known copyright restrictions in 
the United States on the use of the text. 


http://www. archive.org/details/cu31924000421325 


Macmillai’s Science Monographs 


THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT 


MACMILLAN AND CO., LimITED 
LONDON . BOMBAY . CALCUTTA 
MELBOURNE 


THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 
NEW YORK . BOSTON CHICAGO 
DALLAS SAN FRANCISCO 


THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Lrtp. 
TORONTO 


__ .._._......_g@°&g _. Sy ___ _ 


Tue ‘*SHoRtT-STYLE” FLOWER or Cotton, 


THE 
COTTON PLANT 
IN EGYPT 


Studies in Physiology and Genetics 


W. LAWRENCE BALLS, M.A. 


Fellow of St. John’s Co ollege, Cambridge. 
Membre de PiInstitut Egyplicn ; Bo fants Ld e a 
Department of Agriculture, Egyptian G melt 


MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED 
ST. SA RIIN'S SPREET, LONDON 


T9Q12 


COPYRIGHT 


RicHarp CLay AND Sons, LIMITED 
BRUNSWICK ST., STAMFORD ST., S.E., AND 
BUNGAY, SUFFOLK. 


PREFACE 


THis book has been written with the purpose of 
abstracting the results of a series of researches made 
upon cotton plants in Egypt, which investigations, 
though diverse, were connected by the desire to know 
all that could be learned about the plant itself. Portions 
of these inquiries have appeared in various journals, 
but most of the material here utilised has not yet 
been published. Where it may appear to the reader 
that a conclusion necessitates much fuller data than is 
placed before him, I can only ask his clemency until 
such time as a fuller monograph shall be written. 

Primarily, I have written for those few Economic 
Botanists who are more botanical than economic, but I 
have found so much genuine interest displayed by the 
pure botanist, and by the pure economist, as well as by 
the cotton spinner and the irrigation engineer, that in the 
hope of giving them some explanation of the relation 
between my inquiries and their interests, I have written 
with divided attention. The result is avowedly un- 
satisfactory, but the difficulty is inherent in any application 
of natural science to economic material. 

While the subject is parochial in its origin, having 


been studied almost entirely at Cairo, I venture to think 
vii 


vill PREFACE 


that its interest is not purely Egyptian, if only from the 
fact that American Upland cottons have been employed 
extensively ; the chapters on Heredity apply equally to 
the American crop. 

Some of the data are not without suggestiveness to 
students of even human physiology and genetics. 

The views expressed are purely personal, except where 
specific reference is made to the contrary. To any who 
may recognise their assistance inadequately acknowledged 
I herewith proffer my regrets, with the assurance that 
such plagiarism has not been conscious. 

The botanist may find, I fear, that the treatment is 
far from thorough in its consideration of recent work, 
and it may be that in many matters which I have 
regarded as original the priority rests elsewhere. For 
such mistakes it may be fairly pleaded that Egypt has 
been a lonely place for a botanist until the current year. 
Even the card index reproduced as the bibliography is 
rather casual than systematic. 

The economic importance of any contribution to our 
knowledge of the cotton plant needs no explanation. The 
industry is one of the largest in England, with almost 
unlimited influence. In Egypt itself the cotton crop is the 
prime factor in the finance of the country ; other crops 
and industries are relatively insignificant, and a partial 
failure of the cotton crop may cause a financial crisis. 

It might be thought that such an important crop 
would have been one of the first to which scientific 
investigation should have been applied by the world in 
general, so soon as the profitable nature of such inquiries 
became obvious to the financier. Unfortunately, the 
trail of the “ practical man” was followed somewhat 


PREFACE ix 


too closely in the investigations which were made before 
the end of last century, with the result that many field 
experiments have expressed the net result of many 
conflicting factors, and have given but little indication as 
to the components. 

On my appointment to the staff of the Khedivial 
Agricultural Society at the end of 1904, as Cryptogamic 
Botanist, and hence specialising on heredity and physiology 
in cotton—on account of the innate perversity of things 
Egyptian—I decided to abandon the accepted method of 
crop-inspection on a large scale, and to substitute detailed 
examination of a few plants. The literature then extant 
gave scarcely any assistance to such heterodox procedure, 
and the story of the researches which followed from this 
decision has been written on a tolerably clean sheet. 

The work began as Genetics, but necessarily extended 
into Physiology. This mental transition was accelerated 
by the pronounced deterioration of the Egyptian crop, 
both in yield and quality, which began to be obvious in 
1905, and culminated in the catastrophic failure of the 
1909 crop. The physiological researches necessitated by 
demands for information as to the possible effects of 
unsuitable soil-water conditions have given results of 
more immediate interest, and of greater novelty, than 
the weary routine accumulation of critical data for 
Mendelian analysis, though the latter are probably of 
higher intrinsic value. 

For years it had been intended to establish a suitable 
field laboratory in which the work could be conducted 
efficiently, but, owing to various causes, this establishment 
was delayed, and it has taken from December 13th, 1907, 
when the resolution was passed, till March, 1912, to 


% PREFACE 


realise intentions in this respect. The.scope and utility 
of the work has been limited to a regrettable extent by 
the absence of this provision, and more particularly on 
the economic side. 

My acknowledgments for assistance rendered: must of 
necessity be incomplete. In the first place, my thanks 
are due to the Khedivial Agricultural Society, which for six 
years gave me freedom to conduct researches as I choose ; 
for this exceptional treatment I am indebted to H.H. 
Prince Hussein Pasha Kamel, President of the Society, to 
Mr. G. P. Foaden, and to Abdel Hamid Bey Abaza, 
successively Secretary-General thereof, while my colleagues 
on the staff have given every assistance. Since my 
transfer to the new Department of Agriculture the work 
has been continued, the Mendelian laboratory projected by 
the Society has been established by the Egyptian Govern- 
ment, and a pure-strain system of seed-supply is in process 
of adoption. 

Many of the records utilised would not have been 
obtainable without the steady co-operation after 1909 of 
my assistant, Mr. Francis 8. Holton, to whom I am 
especially indebted. The members of the Cairo Scientific 
Society, and of the Botany School at Cambridge have 
displayed an encouraging interest in the work. 

To specify individual assistance among so many would 
be invidious, but on looking back over the train of ideas 
involved, I find that the most illuminating of these have 
come from the late Mr. J. R. Gibson, English Com- 
missioner for the State Domains, from Mr. F. F. Blackman, 
F.R.S., Reader in Botany in the University of Cambridge, 
and from Mr. J. A. Todd, Professor of Economics at the 
Khedivial School of Law, Cairo, while the data on the 


PREFACE xi 


h drology of sub-soil water garnered by Mr. H. T. Ferrar, 
of the local Survey Department, have provided a founda- 
tion for discussions on this most important topic. 

I should like also to acknowledge the pains which 
Prof. R. A. Gregory, the Editor of this series, has taken, 
under all the disadvantages involved by my absence in 
Egypt. 

The greater part of the work would not have been 
executed had it not been for the assistance of my wife, 
who has also helped me in preparing the present volume, 
and in working up the records on which it is based. 


W. Lawrence BALLs. 
Gezira House, 
CatRo. 


CONTENTS 


PREFACE 


SECTION I 
HISTORICAL 


SECTION II 
THE INDIVIDUAL PLANT 


CHAPTER I 


FERTILISATION, CYTOLOGY, AND EMBRYOLOGY 


CHAPTER II 


DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT. I, 


CHAPTER III 


DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT. II 


CHAPTER IV 
THE COTTON FIBRE 


SECTION III 
THE RACH 


CHAPTER V 
FLUCTUATION 


PAGE 
vu 


14 


54 


81 


91 


XIV 


COMMERCIAL VARIETIES . 


NATURAL CROSSING . 


HEREDITY. I 


HEREDITY. II 


ECONOMICS . 


BIBLIOGRAPHY . 


CONTENTS 


CHAPTER VI 


CHAPTER VII 
CHAPTER VIII 


CHAPTER Ix 


SECTION IV 


CHAPTER X 


PAGE 


105 


113 


127 


150 


176 


181 


LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 


e ‘‘Short-style” Flower of Cotton . . . Frontispiece 
. Ovule, Seed, and Lint A 

. The Mechanism of Nuclear Division 

. Development of Pollen 

. Fertilisation and Embryology . 

29. Temperature of the Seed Bed . a a 
. The Plant and the Environment. Gezira, Cairo, 1911 
. Growth and Temperature of a Fungus 

. Growth and Temperature of a Root 

. Growth of Stem . 

. The Sunshine Effect . 

. The Root: Development, ASpiyation anil. Hagensration 
. Seedling 

. Water Jet Hxoavatinn of Buots 

. Regeneration of the Root-System . 

. Stomatograph Records 

. Transpiration in Field Crop 

. Internal Temperature of Leaves 

. Comparison of Varieties 

. Specific Growth-habit 

. Flowering Curves. Giza. 1910. 


Mean Flowering Curves in Field Crop, 1909, 1910 and 1911 


. Composition of Sheddings 

. Terraced Land. Giza. 1909 . 

. Height of Stem . é 
. Maximum Lint-length of Single Suede F 
. The Impurity of Commercial Varieties . 
. Netted Plants 

52a. 
52s. ; ‘ 
. Correlation Diagram for Two Bates of Alldiounerphe j 


The Breeding Plot 
The Breeding Plot 


PAGE 


103 
111 
117 
120 
121 
131 


XV1 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 


FIGe 


54. Typical Plant of ‘‘77.” July 10, 1909 
55. A File-sheet BY ttn, 8 

56. Growth of Stem 

57. Height of Stem in June . 

58. Height of Stem in F, 

59. Length of the Leaf . 

“60. Form of the Flower 

61. Width of the Boll 

_ 62. Form of the Boll 

63 and 64. Loculi of the Ovary 

65. Loculi of the Ovary . 

66. Mean Seed-Weight . 

67. yy $5 in Inter- en ewes 
68. ,, ‘5 in Aigypto-Upland Cross 
69. Dissection of Mean Seed-Weight in F, 

70. Mean Maximum Lint-length 


71. Area and Yield of the Egyptian Cotton Ciro 1895- 1911 


PAGE 


134 
135 
152 
153, 
155 
157 
161 
162 
163 
164 
166 
167 
169 
169 
171 
174 
177 


THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT 


SECTION I 
HISTORICAL © * 


Tue history of civilisation in the Nile Valley can be 
followed into the past for half a hundred centuries. 
Textile fabrics have been found among the earliest 
remains of Ancient Egypt, but in none of these can we 
recognise any fragment of the plant upon which is based 
the latter-day prosperity of the country. 

The cloth found in the ancient remains, notably as 
mummy-wrappings, was invariably made of linen, and 
though a watch is being kept by the Antiquities Depart- 
ment for traces of the cotton plant, none have yet been 
discovered. Still there is a strong presumption that the 
genus Gossypium is no modern upstart in Egypt, for in 
spite of philological confusion it seems clear that cotton 
was in common use during Ptolemaic times, though flax 
was exclusively employed for funereal purposes. Pliny 
gives an unmistakable description of a cotton plant which 
grew in the upper part of Egypt, from which garments 
were made for the priests, Herodotus describes how Amasis 
sent a cotton corselet of wonderful fineness to the 
Lacedemonians, and the famous tri-lingual “ Rosetta 


* Reference numbers appearing in the text denote publications by the 
Author, as enumerated in the Bibliography. References to other authors 
therein enumerated are made in the usual manner, with a number in 
brackets where more than one paper is given. 


B 


2 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT 
Stone,” which solved the riddle of the hieroglyphs, bears 


a reference to cotton. 

These and similar data, however, do not enable us to 
trace the existence of cotton in the Nile Valley beyond 
an earlier date than about B.c. 200, and such antiquity is 
trivial in Egypt. There are, however, several wild cottons 
in the Sudan, some of which were recorded by explorers 
in the early nineteenth century; whether they are truly 
indigenous, in view of the extensive movements of Arab 
traders all over Africa, may well be doubted, but their 
existence leads one to think that some lucky excavation, 
or perhaps a casual glance through a microscope, will 
suddenly extend the known history of cotton in Egypt by 
two or three thousand years. 

The geographical position of Egypt, on the overland 
commercial route to the East, makes the recognition of 
indigenous cotton a difficult matter for medizval times. 
Later, at the end of the sixteenth century, we have 
records by Arabic writers which describe the cultural 
operations pursued in Egypt itself, and mention the 
principal localities in which weaving was practised. At 
the same epoch we have the first botanical record of an 
Egyptian cotton plant, by Prosper Alpino and by Vesling. 
Although the plant they figure was merely an ornamental 
garden shrub, and apparently distinct from the cultivated 
one, the record is not without interest, as it seems to 
describe the same Peruvian-type tree cotton which was 
taken from a garden and extended into a field crop by 
Jumel, some two centuries later, and from which the 
present stock has developed. 

When Napoleon Buonaparte effected his famous invasion 
of the country at the end of the eighteenth century, he 
brought in his train a peaceful force of savants, whose 
labours are fully recorded in the unique “ Description de 
lEgypte.” From this we obtain much detailed informa- 
tion, with the added advantage that the herbaria then 


HISTORICAL 3 


collected are still extant. ‘'wo entirely different species 
of cotton were then under cultivation. One was a tree, 
grown in Upper Egypt, and apparently identical with 
Alpino’s plant. The other, an annual, peculiar to the 
Delta, was possibly the same as the cultivated form which 
Alpino did not describe ; in any case it belonged to the 
Asiatic group of cottons, still found on the other shore of 
the Levant, but now extinct in Egypt, and only repre- 
sented in the Nile Valley by a tree-cotton found in 
Sennaar, two thousand miles away. 

The cultivation of this short- -stapled Asiatic cotton 
died out,in consequence of the economic development of 
Jumel’s plant, and the last trace we find is a record in 
1840 stating that it was almost extinct. 

The tree-cotton from Upper Egypt, probably identical 
with Alpino’s garden plant, possibly even with that of 
Pliny, was next brought forward under the egis of 
Mohammed Ali, founder of the Khedivate, at the sugges- 
tion of M. Jumel, a Franco-Swiss engineer. Taken from 
the garden of Maho Bey, in Cairo, it was propagated 
rapidly from the year 1820 under a system of State- 
control, and soon displaced the Asiatic type. The brown, 
long, strong lint, readily ginned from the almost naked 
seed, quickly made its reputation with the spinners, and 
this type of lint has been typical of the Egyptian product 
ever since. 

To trace the origin of the present cultivated varieties 
from this stock is almost impossible. Still, the following 
interpretation meets all the facts at present known. 

The success of Jumel’s tree-cotton led to the importa- 
tion and trial of other cottons, notably Sea Island. 
Importations of this latter strain, an annual in habit, have 
continued to the present day. It is not very successful 
in Egypt, yielding lightly, and suffering unduly from 
“shedding,” but the lint is often of good quality, equal 
to that of Georgia’s and Florida's. The state control of the 

: BQ 


4 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT 


seed-supply became disorganised after a time, partly in con- 
sequence of Mohammed Ali’s military activities, and the 
inevitable mixing of the two seed stocks was accelerated. 
This mixing, combined with natural crossing, led to the 
formation of splitting-forms, some of which were annual 
but brown-linted, and these gave rise to the Ashmouni 
stock, or old “Brown Egyptian,” which dominated the 
fields up to 1887. The tree-type disappeared in conse- 
quence of its greater liability to damage from insect pests 
such as the Boll-worm (Harias insulana) which was 
definitely recorded in Egypt as early as 1876, and also on 
account of the better cultivation obtained with plants of 
annual habit. The only remaining trace of its influence is 
the presence of abnormally tall rogues—up to four metres 
in height—in the field. The Hamouli variety was possibly 
an intermediate stage in this process of extinction by 
artificial and natural selection. 

From the Ashmouni stock came the Afifi, in 1887, by 
selection, probably natural in part, and from this now 
degenerate complex of sub-varieties and splitting-forms 
other varieties have been selected. The Ashmouni stock 
was driven into Upper Egypt, and has.there improved 
itself until it is now making a reputation anew. 

The relatively white lint of the Sea Island stock has 
always been a feature of at least one Egyptian variety, 
such as Abyad and Gallini, both extinct, and the modern 
Abbassi. Gallini in particular, while possessing the bigger 
boll, higher yield, and “climatic suitability” of ‘its 
Peruvian-type ancestor, was a very fine cotton, which 
controlled the fine-spinning market for years until it 
deteriorated through mixture and crossing and was driven 
into oblivion by competition with Georgia’s and Florida’s, 
its own ancestors. Gallini has been revenged of late years 
on its unnatural ancestors by the modern Yannovitch, 
itself a single plant selection from the Afifi complex. 

The apparent identity of all the modern varieties of 


HISTORICAL 5 


Egyptian cotton in external appearance—for even when 
grown side by side they are scarcely distinguishable— 
is the natural result of their origin from two related stocks. 
This absence of differentiating characters, excepting for 
the lint itself, has been responsible for a fund of fatalistic 
ideas about deterioration, which, though possibly 
appropriate to the near Hast, are nevertheless untenable. 
The “running-out ” of varieties, miscalled inevitable, need 
no longer be the bogey of the cultivator. A recognition 
of the incontrovertible fact that the nominal varieties are 
more or less heterogeneous complexes of heterozygotes, 
even when first introduced to commerce, should enable us 
in the future to dictate the history of Egyptian cotton 
with greater definition than Mohammed Ali could ensure. 

Systematy.—In this brief summary of the few 
available historical facts, it has seemed advisable to evade 
systematy, and the pitfalls thereof, by referring to 
G. wtifoum (Cav.) as the “ Peruvian type,” and to 
G. herbaceum annuum as the “ Asiatic type.” For 
further details the reader should consult Mr. Fletcher’s 
article* and Sir George Watt’s monograph. Though 
opinions may differ as to the real importance of some of 
these classifications, the latter book nevertheless forms 
a standard and permanent record of specimens and 
synonyms. 

The three main phyla of Gossypium are all represented 
in the Nile Valley, for the weed “ Hindi” cotton now 
found in the fields is certainly on the same phylogenetic 
line as the “ American Upland stock,” or G. hirsutum. 
The author’s inclination is to believe it to be a smooth- 
seeded sport from G'‘. hirsutum, since parallel cases are 
well known in both the other phyla.t In any case, the 
Egyptian ‘‘ Hindi” is not homogeneous, but consists of at 
least two forms, one hirsute, the other glabrous. 


* Fletcher (*). } Allard, H. A. (4), Fyson, P. F. 


SECTION II 


THE INDIVIDUAL PLANT 


CHAPTER I 
FERTILISATION, CYTOLOGY, AND EMBRYOLOGY 


THE development of the sexual cells’ in the cotton flower 
bud is not marked by many special features, but the 
intrinsic importance of the gametes is such that the main 
characteristics of their microscopic’ history should be 
examined, if only to facilitate their visualisation when 
matters relating to heredity are under discussion. 

The life-story of the individual begins at the moment of 
fusion between the male and female gametes, viz., between 
the generative nucleus of the pollen grain and the egg-cell 
of the ovule. The unicellular zygote thus formed develops 
by repeated division into an embryo enclosed in the seed- 
coats, and the germination of this seed is the stage 
commonly regarded as beginning the life-story. For 
reasons both of precision and of ultimate convenience, we 
shall commence the study of an individual plant at the 
union of the gametes, first, however, describing the genesis 
of the latter. 

The Gamete-mother Cells.—The young flower-bud 
(Fig. 1) develops centripetally from the primordia of 
involucral bracts, calyx, corolla with staminal column, and 
lastly ovary. The latter is composed of two to six carpels, 
which originate as separate ring-primordia, developing 


cH. 1 FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY 


Se OM fi 
NEL yf 


W.L.B. dol. 


Frias. 1 to 7.—Ovuig, Srep, anp Lint. 


8 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


into hollow cones. These unite laterally to form the 2- 
to 6-locular ovary, while the combined apices of the cones 
elongate to form the style (sy.). Large-celled conducting 
tissue is formed at the base of the style and in the radial 
walls, which afterwards facilitates transit for the burrowing 
pollen-tube. On the inner side of these hollow cones 
(y. ov.) there arise the ovules with their double integu- 
ments ; a single cell in the centre of the nucellus enlarges 
into the single megaspore mother-cell. 

The microspore mother-cells are formed in plates below 
the epidermis of the embryo anthers (st.) on the staminal 
column. They arise from the cell-layer immediately 
below the epidermis, but soon separate themselves from 
it by two layers of cells, and then enlarge till their 
diameter is about 40 », when they pass into the synapsis 
stage. Meanwhile (Fig. 8), the cells which surround them 
on all sides divide once, and thus give rise to a tapetum, 
which is ultimately disintegrated. 

The mechanism of nuclear division in reduc- 
tion.*—This division has not been captured for observa- 
tion in the megaspore mother-cell ; it appears to take place 
very rapidly, judging by the ease with which the stages. 
immediately precedent and antecedent can be found. 
The same applies to the microspore mother-cell, where 
the stage is easily observed about ten days before the 
flower is due to open. 

The extraordinary minuteness of the chromosomes of 
Gossypium is very obvious in this division, where they are 
inconspicuous in comparison with the linin threads, which 
have actually been figured in error as the chromosomes 
themselves. The latter appear to consist of twenty groups 
of pseudo-tetrads, each unit of the group being about 
06 in diameter, arranged in prophase along one side 
of the somewhat tangled close spireme of linin. This 
spireme splits longitudinally and the two halves separate 
like loops of cotton in a broken soap-bubble, retaining 


FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY 9 


W.LB. del. 


Fics. 8 to 18.--THe Mecuanism or Nucigear Division. 
Fias. 19, 20.—-DEveLOpMENT OF POLLEN, 


10 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


connection with the chromosome groups by fine fibres 
(Fig. 11), which become the spindle fibres. The pseudo- 
tetrads are then halved into groups of pairs, the inter- 
chromosome fibre disappears in the cytoplasm, and the 
two daughter nuclei rapidly divide again (Figs. 14, 15) in 
the same way, never breaking the thread-rings, and thus 
distribute one minute chromosome from each pseudo-tetrad 
to each of the four microspores. 

The prominence of the non-chromatic linin structures in 
this remarkable division has enabled these changes to be 
examined thoroughly. The main features are summarised 
above, and the possibility of providing a physical explana- 
tion for nuclear division on these lines makes the observa- 
tion one of general interest. The same thread-rings are 
found in the somatic nuclei (Figs. 16, 17, 18), where the 
chromosomes number forty, and the same scheme is 
followed.” 

The spores.—The microspores, or pollen-grains, are 
thus formed in groups of four. Hach member of the group 
enlarges (Fig. 19), develops spiny sculpturings on its 
outer wall, colouring matter—golden in the case of 
Egyptian cotton—and finally floats free in the liquefied 
residuum of the tapetum. Some three days before the 
flower opens, the single nucleus divides into a moruloid 
vegetative nucleus and a smaller ellipsoid generative 
nucleus (Fig. 20). The latter again divides into two, the 
male gametes, and the pollen grain is then ready to 
fertilise the ovary. 

The megaspores are also formed in groups of four, but 
the three nearest the base of the ovule abort, and only the 
fourth member becomes a megaspore. The usual nuclear 
changes then take place: the three antipodals abort before 
the flower opens, while the two polar nuclei have met in 
the centre of the spore, though without fusion, and two 
typical synergids support the egg-cell or female gamete. 

Fertilisation.—We shall have ample occasion later to 


FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY 11 


WL B.del. 


Fries. 21 to 28.— FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY. 


12 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


discuss the methods by which the pollen-grain reaches the 
style, whether of its own, or of another flower, and also to 
inquire into the pseudo-parasitic nature of the pollen tube, 
which attacks some styles more easily than others. For the 
present we will examine a normal case. 

The sugar solution excreted by hairs on the style retains 
the pollen-grain, and causes it to germinate. The single 
pollen tube traverses the tissue of the style and the 
conducting tissues till its end enters one of the loculi, 
along the wall of which it passes till it finds (Fig. 3) 
the micropyle of an ovule. Traces of branching may be 
seen at this point. Passing through the micropyle 
channel to the nucellus, it bores through the tissues of the 
latter, and after literally squeezing its way through the 
firmer wall of the megaspore, the end of the tube swells 
up and bursts (Figs. 21,22). From the torn end escape the 
two male gametes, one of which passes to and fuses with 
the egg-cell (Figs. 23, 24), forming a zygote, and thus 
beginning a new life-history. ‘The other male fuses with 
the two polar nuclei, and the triple nucleus thus formed 
(Fig. 25) serves later to provide the endosperm. 

The process is exceptionally rapid. Fertilisation is 
normally completed within thirty hours after the first 
opening of the flower, ze. by the afternoon of the 
following day. 

The embryo.—From the date on which the flower opens 
until the boll cracks, some forty to sixty days later, 
according to the weather and the kind of plant, the 
embryo is developing inside the fertilised ovule, or seed. 

On the third day of this period the unicellular zygote 
divides along a plane at right angles to the axis of the 
ovule, its forty chromosomes, formed by the addition of 
two twenties from each gamete, being each halved and 
distributed to the daughter-cells (Fig. 26). ‘Two more 
divisions produce an octant (Fig. 27), and by the end of 
the week the embryo is just visible to the naked eye, 


I FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY 13 


consisting of some hundreds of cells, and exhibiting a 
cordate form under the microscope (Fig. 28). The 
pointed end becomes the radicle, and the two lobes develop 
into two cotyledons, marked with black dots caused by 
the presence of the resin-glands which are characteristic 
of all portions of the cotton plant other than the root. 
The adult cotyledons are folded in a complex way, being 
considerably broader than the seed in which they are 
contained, and they envelop the straight radicle. Their 
cells contain much of the food reserves in the form of oil, 
which is an important commercial product. The endosperm, 
formed by rapid division of the triple nucleus, is destroyed 
during the growth of the embryo, so that the ripe seed is 
ex-albuminous. 

We shall postpone consideration of the seed coat, and 
of the development of the lint upon it, to its proper place 
at the end of the story of the individual. 


CHAPTER II 
DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT—1. 


Tue physiology of a cotton plant growing under the field 
conditions which obtain in Egypt may be conveniently 
considered in two stages. During the first stage, which 
includes the period from sowing to flowering, the plant 
is mainly under the control of aérial conditions. After 
flowering, in the middle of June (near Cairo), a critical 
period ensues, during and after which the soil conditions 
commonly provide the limiting factors. 

The subject is one of great interest, on account of the 
stringent environmental conditions which prevail during 
a great part of the Egyptian cotton-season. (See Figs. 
30 and 33, Environment.) Thus, in the month of June at 
Cairo the meteorological conditions are somewhat as 
follows :—Sun temperature maximum, 75°C. ; Clouds, rare ; 
Shade temperature maximum, usually 34° C., at 2 p.m.: 
occasionally 42° C.: minimum about 20° C., at 6 am.; 
Humidity, dropping to 20 per cent. of saturation, or even 
less, during the day, and rising above 90 per cent. at 
night ; Wind, strongest by day. 

Such conditions result in xerophytic adaptions, unless 
an ample water-supply is available, as it is in Egypt 
through irrigation ; but we shall see later that even under 
conditions of field cultivation, the cotton plant virtually 
becomes a xerophyte every afternoon. After the month 
of June, however, the increasing size of the plants 


14 


cH. 11 DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT Os 


automatically modifies the severity of the environment, 
in so far as the lower portions are concerned, by producing 
a “‘ surface climate” with higher humidities and less wind, 
consequently less evaporation, and affording at least 
intermittent shade to any given portion of plant tissue. 
Germination.—The sowing of the Egyptian crop takes 
place at different times, varying with the locality and with 


1 
1 
1 
1 
i] 


i 

' i 

[= ' March 80th. 

1 I 

a ee 
20°C. ! : i 

: 

{ 

; 

| 


| 
10.0 | : 
5 a ‘March 81st. 
20 i 
10. " —————— 
oe April Ist. 
20 
10 ! 
Night Gam. Noon 6pm. Night 


\ a. Seed sown Bb. Irrigated 
Weather normal 
Fic. 29.—TreMPERATURE OF THE SEED BED, 


Recorded by thermo-electric junction placed 5 cm, below surface on 
south side of ridge. 


the weather, from the end of February until May. The 
habit of sowing on ridges running east and west secures a 
higher soil-temperature on the south face. The tempera- 
ture of the seed bed before, during, and after optimum 
sowing-time was recorded electrically in 1911 (Fig. 29); 
the sudden rise shown at the moment of sowing (a) is due 
to the scorched surface soil which fell into the hole, 
showing how effective is the heat insulation of dry soil, 
since the depth of the hole was only 4 cm. The heat 
absorptivity and conductivity of the soil after irrigation (b) 


16 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


Maximum, Black-bulb in vacuo 


Lower limit of Thermotoxic effect 


<= aes eee Spee ee ee Acar gastos 


Maximum Shade Temp. 


Temperature 
(Survey Dept.) 


° Minimum Temp. 


10 mm. Sown ae ae 


s : . 
3 20 mm. Mean Growth per day on Ten Afifi Plants. (main axis) ae 
§ 

WwW 


OOO ergs 7 
Ieee Seterecetererececeoees | Wat i 


RES SLG 


The Root 


SSCS SSRIS noe SRK KKS 
LS earenestatatecestotecencetereeen SS ISSN 


On% Oe <o Lx 
IRR SKS “ 


Flowering Mean 
Shedding Growth 
Bolling mm, . 
S p-p.p.d. per day Records of Individual Plant shown in Fig. 37. 


Germinated caw me eer me ® 


S 
~~ 
i) 
g Sown 
z 


a —T 7 
April May dune 
5 2 10 18 2% 4 12 20 28 1 9 #17 


Fic, 30.—THr PLANT AND THE 


are both obviously greater than that of the dry soil. The 
magnitude of this daily change in soil-temperature 
diminishes with increasing depth, and is negligible below 
50 cm. Thus the root-tip in the early stages of germina- 
tion is subject to great variations in temperature, but 
after the root has grown some 15 cm., the temperature is 
constant, except for the annual change. At a depth of 
50 cm. the temperature is approximately 17° C. at the 
beginning of March, rising to about 25° C. in the 
summer. 

The localisation of the optimum sowing-date will be 
discussed later, in connection with the date of the first 
flower. For the present it suffices to notice that sowings 
in the middle of February near Cairo will take twelve 
days to show the cotyledons above ground, while identical 
sowings made in the middle of April may appear in five 
days, temperature being the limiting factor. The sowings 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT | 17 


Maximum, Black-bu/b in vacuo 
x Maximum Shade Temp, 


ee Sn rN 
Minimum Temp. NO 


<I II> 


es Sub-soil Water Period Autumnal Period 
W 
oe ae I a nN 
ROIS 
SoU SR 


REI 
x 
ees ee 


Environment. Gezira, Carro. 1911. 


on intermediate dates take intermediate times, vary- 
ing, of course, with the particular weather which they 
experience. 

The proportion of seeds which successfully complete 
their “ field-germination” also varies—other things being 
equal—with the sowing-date. The lowest proportions are 
found in the very early and very late sowings, though for 
totally dissimilar reasons. The failures in the first 
instance are almost entirely due to a damping-off fungus, 
known as ‘‘ Sore-shin,” which we must consider in further 
detail, not. merely because it is the only serious fungoid 
disease of cotton in Egypt, but rather because certain 
conclusions drawn from the study of its relations to 
temperature will be used extensively for interpreting the 
growth-processes of its host. 

The “Sore-shin” fungus.’*°‘—This facultative 
parasite was first described in 1895 by Mr. G. F. Atkinson 

C 


18 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


in the United States. It is practically omnivorous, and is 
the only damping-off fungus which seriously attacks cotton- 
seedlings in the Egyptian fields. The organism is an 
extremely simple one, probably a degenerate Basidio- 
mycete, but devoid of any spore-forms. A resting-stageé is 
produced by free branching of hyphe into clusters of short 
swollen cells, which turn brown, forming irregular hard 
black spots on the mycelium. Such resting-cell forma- 
tion precedes the staling or exhaustion of an ample food 
supply. The mycelium containing these cell-clusters has 
been kept over calcium chloride for nearly two years, and 
sent out abundant hyphe when moistened at the end of 
the period. The hyphe are all equivalent, in the absence 
of any sexual process, and are diagnosed by a curious 
septum which is formed in each lateral branch immediately 
above the point of origin. 

When a cotton seedling has been completely decom- 
posed by the fungus in a somewhat dry site, the hyphe 
which grow away from it form branching brown rhizo- 
morphs, seeking fresh sources of food. The fungus is 
ubiquitous in Egypt, and its sterile mycelium must be 
regarded as a gigantic network, stretching through the 
soils of all the country. 

It is strictly aérobic, grows freely on most culture 
media, though with difficulty when the nitrogen is 
presented as urea, and forms resting cells very quickly on 
asparagin media, while it can infect cotton seedlings 
under perfectly sterile conditions. The cotton plant is 
‘immune when cork layers have been formed, though even 
then it can be infected at wounds, but without any 
notable injury. 

The chief interest of the disease lies in its absolute 
dependence on temperature, and the consequent mis- 
apprehension existing as to the effect of cold on cotton 
seed. If germinating seeds, or seedlings, are kept damp 
at a temperature of 20°C. with a fragment of “sore-shin ” 


1 DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 19 


culture, they are visibly infected in three hours, and 
completely destroyed in a few days. Repetition of the 
experiment at 33° C. produces slight superficial brown 
scars, and nothing more, while at 37° C. the seedlings 
remain without injury. Moreover, if an infection has 
been well established at 20° C., and is then transferred to 
a temperature of 37° C. for an hour or two, or for several 
hours to 33° C., the infection is arrested. The hyphe 
cease to advance, and the host proceeds to delimit the 
damaged portion by means of a cork cambium.’” 

The effect of high temperature can be modified in one 
way. If the tissue to be infected is partially immersed in ~ 
water and kept at 33° C., the fungus will destroy all the 
cells on the water-line, though merely scarring the epi- 
dermis above, as before, and leaving the immersed portions 
untouched, on account of deficient aération. 

The results of infections in the field depend on the age 
of the plant. The brown skin of seedling roots is 
commonly regarded as normal to the cotton plant, whereas 
it is actually due to abortive attacks by this fungus and 
possibly by a Rhizopus. Very late sown seedlings have 
pure white roots. The seed is doomed if the attack takes 
place as soon as the tip of the radicle emerges from the 
seed-coat ; its growing point is destroyed, while the fungus 
enters the seed-coats and rots the cotyledons; such seed 
is commonly said to have been “killed by the cold.” 
When the attack is made on an established root or 
hypocotyl, the infection has to be sufficiently extensive to 
reach the phloem tissues ; such destruction of the phloem 
limits the supply of synthesised food from the leaves to 
the root, and may check root-growth ; this check in its turn 
limits aérial growth, and so produces stunted plants, which 
flower lite and make the crop irregular. If much phloem 
tissue is destroyed, the seedling may die through indirect 
water shortage during the day, but though seedlings which 
have wilted from this cause are common in the field, the 

Cc 2 


20 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


most serious attack is the inconspicuous one which occurs 
at the beginning of germination. 

A treatment of the seed with 24 per cent. of its weight 
of naphthalene, mixed with gypsum as a cement, effec- 
tually prevents this primary attack, though leaving the 
seedling unprotected by the time of secondary infection. 

A notable example of secondary infection was observed 
in May, 1906, on a piece of land at Giza, which had 
become very foul with weeds, and was consequently a hot- 
bed of ‘‘sore-shin,” so that a third sowing had been 
necessary. The clusters of seedlings from this were 
’ perfectly clean, under the protection of the summer 
temperature, till two abnormally cool and cloudy days 
arrived. When these were over, every tenth cluster had 
been completely destroyed,’ and the clean white roots had 
deliquesced into a sodden brown mass. 

The facts here related led the author to a conviction 
that further investigation would be profitable, and after 
some experimental difficulty, a method for studying the 
relation of this fungus to temperature was devised. Since 
the results appear to be capable of general application, 
their description may be considered under a general title, 
and supplemented by less precise data from cotton itself. 

Temperature and growth.’—The effects of tem- 
perature on the growth of the “sore-shin” fungus were 
studied with special apparatus. A moist-chamber was 
devised in which the concentration of the “ hanging drop” 
containing the fungus remained constant, however quickly 
the temperature was changed. This change was effected 
through a double jacket of liquid in which the chamber 
was completely immersed. The measurements of elonga- 
tion of the observed hypha were made every minute 
through a water-immersion objective with a micrometer 
eyepiece, while the actual temperature of the hanging-drop 
itself was recorded to 0°1°C. by means of a delicate 
thermo-electric junction in the field of the microscope, 


1 DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT ) 21 


balanced on a similar couple in a water-bath of known 
temperature. 

Consequently, the two variables under examination 
were recorded with unusually high precision, and relatively 
rapid temperature changes could be employed with safety. 

The general arrangement of the initial work was 
such as to ensure that temperature, and temperature 
alone, should be the factor which limited the growth. 
The rate of temperature-change was usually about 1° C. in 
three minutes, so as partially to avoid errors from 
prolonged exposure to high temperatures, and the air 
space of the chamber was filled with pure oxygen. Under 
these conditions growth-curves like Fig. 31 were obtained 
from fresh cultures, recently renewed, and kept at low 
temperatures, so as to be free from any suspicion of 
staleness. These curves indicated that growth followed 
chemico-physical laws, being accelerated by increased 
temperature, and approximately doubled in velocity by a 
rise of 10° C. This acceleration began to fail in the 
neighbourhood of 36° C., and growth ceased altogether at 
a mean temperature of 37°5° C., the maximum. A value 
of +0°5° C. covered departures from normal in the 
position of this maximum. Obviously, a second factor 
was coming into play, antagonistic to the normal accelera- 
tion, and probably itself accelerated by rise of temperature. 

Slower rates of heating, down to the maintenance of 
culture-flasks at various constant high temperatures, 
showed that the time of exposure had an influence on this 
factor. The more rapid the heating, the nearer the 
growth-curve approached to its hypothetical form, «.e., a 
sudden arrest at 37°5° C. when in full swing. The slower 
the heating, the lower was the temperature at which the 
slowing of the growth-rate appeared on the curve, and the 
lower the temperature at which growth ceased. 

Following this graduated series of conditions down to 
the stage at which the change of temperature is infinitely 


22 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 
” 
a oo 
L-¥ 373 6. 
35°C. = a 
> fe 
ae 
° y oi 
30 ¢. xf A 0.120 mm. 
rbe7 
et- 
wr’ 
4% 
25°C a : 0-090mm. 
p \/ 
ry 
AN 
7) 
ée. of 
0-060 2 0-060 mm. 
0-050 
8 a 
5 0-040 
= 
= 0-030 VA 
s ra 
0-020 a 
: 
10 20 30 40 
Minutes 


Maximum rate =0-0055 mm. per minute 


Fic, 31.—GrowtH AND TEMPERATURE OF A FUNGUS. 
Hypha of ‘‘ Sore-shin.” 


slow, we find that growth stops even in a culture kept 
constantly at 20°C., if kept long enough. Such cessation 
of growth is not necessarily due to exhaustion of food 
from the culture, for all the food-ingredients may still be 
present. Further, it takes place, for any given temperature, 
after a lapse of time which is directly proportional to the 
volume of the culture media. 
cultures” will resume their growth if they are eluted with 
pure water. 
Plainly, then, the staling of cultures is due to excretion 


Lastly, such ‘stale 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 25 


by the fungus into | , ye (ae 
the surrounding ~°* — 

' oy 
medium, Such ex- Cal | 


cretion takes place ey 
s ~— 


of a toxic substance xa7e 


more rapidly at 
high temperatures ; 
than at low ones. iz 
Lastly, retracing is 
our series of con- |o.%, 4 
ditions, the cessa- oa 
tion of growth in 
fresh cultures raised 
rapidly to a tem- 
perature of 37°5°C. 
is due to poisoning 
of the protoplam  % 

by the toxin, which Sos 
is produced most 
rapidly at this tem- ya 


02 ee 
perature. We shall ; 


7 Ss 


denote this hypo- 30 60 90 120. 150 


thetical substance, Minutes 
i Maximum rate = 0-025 mm. per minute 
or mixture of sub- 


M 
° 
‘S 


Fic. 32.—GrowtH AND TEMPERATURE OF A 


stances, by the sym- Race 
bol “ax,” for con- Cotton seedling. 
venience. 


The chemical nature of “x” is obscure. It is not an 
enzyme, however. On prolonged boiling, or on exposure 
to air in thin films of water, it is decomposed, and by 
either of these methods we can rejuvenate a stale culture 
medium. Since ‘‘a” is thus unstable, and its chemical. 
nature unknown, we are thrown back upon the growth- 
curve as a test for its presence. Denoting completely 
stale culture media as 100 per cent “x.” we find that the 
depression of our growth stopping-point from the normal 


24 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


37'5°C. is apparently proportional to the percentage of 
“g” which we add to the culture medium. Thus, a 
50 per cent. solution has a stopping point in the neigh- 
bourhood of 32°0°C., however quickly the temperature 
be raised. 

Were it not for the accumulation of “x” in the cells, 
the growth-rate would go on doubling with every ten 
degrees until the death-point was reached at about 49°C. 

This substance is formed only in growing cells of the 
fungus, and unless the formation is very rapid it diffuses 
out into the surrounding medium before an injurious 
concentration can accumulate. Stale mycelium can there- 
fore be rejuvenated by washing with fresh culture medium, 
or with water. Conversely, when the volume of the 
surrounding culture medium is of microscopic dimensions, 
as in a cell of the host plant, staling takes place rapidly. 

We are now in a position to comprehend the peculiar 
relationship to temperature of the ‘“‘sore-shin” disease. 
Owing to the minuteness of the cells of the host, a very 
short exposure to temperatures above 30°C. will completely 
inhibit the parasite’s growth—unless the tissue is washed 
by water—and the host-plant is thus given time in which 
to form the protecting barrier of corky cell-walls. 

It would seem natural to assume that the host-plant 
itself had a different temperature-relationship, since its 
cells would otherwise become stale at the same time as 
those of the fungus, and high temperatures would have no 
protecting effect. This assumption is not correct, however, 
and a different explanation has to be tried, in view of the 
following experimental work. 

In parallel with the experiments on the fungus, a few 
similar measurements were made with the root of 
germinating cotton-seeds. The seedling was immersed 
in a double-jacketed water bath with a glass side, through 
which the elongation of the root-tip was observed by a 
Comparator measuring to 0‘(01 mm. ‘The reserves in the 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 25 


seed formed a sufficient food supply, and. aération was 
maintained by a stream of bubbles of oxygen through the 
water. The rate of heating had to be reduced to about 
1°C. in five minutes, in order to obtain accurate measure- 
ments, but even so, the growth-curve (Fig. 32) was 
identical with that given by the fungus, showing the same 
acceleration, and also stopping at about 37°5°C. Slower 
rates of heating were employed in the form of germination 
trials in the incubator, when it became clear that some 
similar “ x-substance ” was again operative. The germin- 
ation of samples of seed stored at higher temperatures 
is much quicker, though the ultimate germinating per- 
centage is unaffected. Moreover, a 37°C. sample is 
surpassed in four days by a 25°C. sample, not only in the 
mean length of the radicles, but also in mean weight. 
The sample at 37°C. is, in other words, stale, and needs a 
prolonged exposure to lower temperatures if it is to be 
restored to health. 

It should be noticed that a shade temperature of 40° C. 
is frequently reached during the early summer, so that 
some manifestation of this process, which the author has 
denoted as ‘“ Thermotoxy,” may be expected to occur 
during the growth of the crop in the field. We shall see 
later that such is actually the case. 

Meanwhile, one other point needs to be considered. 
The heat-poisoned fungus is cured through removal of 
““,” whether physically by washing, or chemically by 
decomposition. The first method is impossible in the 
higher plants, so that chemical decomposition must be 
invoked; the effect of overheating in one afternoon, 
though plain during the following night, has disappeared 
by the second night. 

_ Now it has long been a truism that every plant has an 
‘optimum temperature” for growth.* We have just seen, 


* See various writings by Mr. F. F. Blackman for critique of these 
terms, 


26 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


however, that two such dissimilar organisms as a cotton 
plant and a sore-shin fungus possess identical growth- 
curves with no true optimum. On the other hand, the 
cotton plant certainly grows best at temperatures near 
32° C. ; we are therefore led to a final conclusion, namely, 
that the general “ growth-optimum ” of any higher plant’ 
is that temperature at which, after prolonged exposure, 
the equilibrium of growth-acceleration with “ x-produc- 
tion” allows the maximum sustained value to the former. 
The “x-production ” factor is itself compound, being the 
balance of “‘ x-production ” against “ x-decomposition,” for 
the latter of which there appear to be special facilities in 
the higher plants. 

Summarising this section, we have found that, in the 
absence of other limiting factors, growth is accelerated by 
rise in temperature along a logarithmic curve, while a 
time factor (“ thermotoxy ”) acts against this acceleration, 
unless the toxic katabolites are removed as fast as they 
are formed. The “optimum” is essentially a variable, 
but the “maximum” is normally constant, though it can 
be depressed by suitable treatment. Tissue temperatures 
which exceed 38° C. reduce the subsequent growth-rate of 
the cotton plant to a marked extent, while prolonged 
exposures above 35° C. are proportionately harmful. 
Exposure to temperatures below 30° C. for a long 
time appears to produce no injurious effect on the cotton 
plant. 

The effect of sunshine.—The conclusions of the 
preceding discussion would lead us to expect that strong 
sunlight might conceivably have a prejudicial effect on the 
growth of the plant-stem, by over-heating the growing- 
point, but thermo-electric measurements of tissue-tem- 
peratures indicate that the young leaves and buds rarely 
exceed the shade temperature during early summer, owing 
to the regulation of their temperature by transpiration. 

Actual measurements of growth, on the other hand, 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 27 


show that direct sunshine inhibits it completely.” ” 
(Figs, 33 and 34). 

This simple discovery has had an almost revolutionary 
effect on our study of plant physiology in Cotton. The 
phenomenon, though almost unprecedented outside Egypt, 
is exhibited by many other plants in Egypt, notably by 
Helianthus. 

The “sunshine effect” was first recognised in May, 
1910, and has since been found to be usual from the first 
appearance of the seedling till the autumn, if not through- 
out the season. The elongation of the stem is checked 
immediately the sun strikes upon it, and a slight shrinkage 
usually follows. A cloud passing across the sun is 
immediately effective in permitting growth, which ceases 
again directly the cloud has passed. 

The contraction of the stem in sunshine indicates that 
loss of water is the direct cause of growth cessation. That 
this explanation is the true one can be shown in many 
ways; thus plants covered by a glass bell-jar so as to 
surround them with an atmosphere of high humidity, will 
grow rapidly in the sun during May. Similar conditions 
occur in the field for a day or two after watering, when 
the plants are large. The most striking proof is provided, 
however, by leaf-removal ; if the total lcaf-area is reduced 
about one quarter, by simply cutting off the lower leaves, 
growth is almost instantly resumed, since the water-loss of 
the stem is reduced. This last experiment shows in a 
striking manner the delicacy of the water equilibrium 
between root-supply and stem-loss. 

Disturbances of this equilibrium are normally effected 
by variations in the weather, such as abnormally high sun 
or shade-temperatures, hot dry winds, etc. It should 
be noticed that the equilibrium-point is probably deter- 
mined by the worst normal conditions, namely, at 1 p.m. to 
2 p.m. 

Artificial disturbances of this equilibrium can be effected 


i THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 
“ Monday i Tuesday / Wednesday / 


T aera fae ae t T ~ r 7 
8 10X12 4 6 8 10Xi 2 #6 8 10Xil 2 4 6 g 10XIl2 4 6 8 10 Xi 2 46 8 10 XII 


7 Li Fi ia ‘caer pap 
Wind) | Tf i PTET Te | 
[eal aw / ] 


ff arse Tae | Bi 
ed iff 


i Ges 


a i an Hr it CCST ueuaul 
MnnLESEUGULERUDUBELERELEEUDEELRun| 


Wednesday / 


6 8 10Xi2 46 8 10 XII 


THT 


TEMPERATURE..............- 


SEER aa 
VA 
Wi 


HUMIDITY 
Fic. 33.—Growti or Sven. 
June 7th was abnormally hot. 
Last watering on May 28th. 


Fold out 


i DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 29 


by limited defoliation, or by root-pruning, or by cul- 
tivation in limited quantities of soil, as in flower pots. All 
these methods give similar results as regards the “sun- 
shine effect.” 

The qualification “limited” is added to the mention of 
defoliation methods because of the interference with photo- 
synthesis which follows if too many leaves are removed, 
or if they are removed from near the terminal bud. 

The positive effect of day temperatures on growth is 
thus almost non-existent, and the modicum of truth which 


Intermittent 
shade (Clouds 


$ 
i=] 
= 
3 & trees) 
Q SUN) 
S 1 Pree : 
3 SUN] Artificially screened from direct Sun 
§05 

“4 A 
2a Sea ar 
s°3 TG [_Niig ht [\[Nifgnt [7 
Soi| Hy “6 r_y aaa 

| ae oe — 

Hour 72 6 Mid- 6 NY 72 6 Mid- 6 72 
ending Noon pm. night am. Noon am. night pm. Noon 


Fic, 34.--Tue SunsHINE Er rect. 


Growth-rate per hour in hypocotyl of an Assili seedling sown on March 7th, 
during March 19th to 2ist. Compare screened portion with temperature 
in Fig. 33. 


attaches to “‘ accumulated-temperature” approximations is 
still further diminished. The only effect of day-tempera- 
ture is the prejudicial one of “ thermotoxy,” excepting on 
the rare occasions when the sky is overcast. Such days 
are remarkably interesting ; usually the clouds take the 
form of a dust-storm, accompanied by high temperatures, 
and so long as the temperature does not reach the 
“thermotoxic” limit, or 35° C., they cause abnormal 
growths to be recorded, since elongation of the stem is 
continuous throughout the twenty-four hours. 

In view of the rarity of such weather we are justified 
in deducing the conclusion that night-temperature is the 
prime factor in growth during the first half of the growing- 
season, provided only that no limiting factor other than 


30 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


temperature operates during the night. On this latter 
point, unfortunately, we are unable to generalise with 
safety. The curve of growth—after sunset—leaps from 
zero to 4 maximum, and thereafter follows the temperature 
curve* till the small hours of the morning (Fig. 34). It 
is not clear whether there is any limitation through 
exhaustion of the photosynthetic food supply before sun- 
rise. On the whole, the evidence is against this view, 
except in rare cases, and in any case such limitation would 
take place at the period of minimum growth-rate. 

Night-temperatures.—Combining our knowledge of 
temperature control with the elimination of day- 
temperatures provided by the “sunshine effect” we are 
enabled to interpret the growth-rates obtained under field- 
conditions with fair exactitude. 

The curve shown in Fig. 30 was obtained by daily 
measurements of the axial shoots of ten cotton plants, thus 
summarising the mean growth of the twenty-four hours. 
The correlation between minimum night-temperature and 
the growth rate up to July Ist is very close (r=0°7843+ 
00459) if those daily periods are excluded in which the 
maximum temperature had risen above 35° C. The 
correlation sinks to a value of 0°5236+0°0755 when 
these are included, owing to thermotoxic effects. 

At this stage of the plant’s existence there can be no 
question as to the economic interest of stem-growth. The 
faster the growth of the stem and branches, the sooner 
will the first flowers open, and the period which we are 
now considering ends with the appearance of these. 

Thus, the date of “arrival” of the crop depends first 
on the night-temperatures which have been experienced, 
secondly, on the date of sowing, and thirdly, on the clouds, 
We shall return to this subject later, in connection with 
the date of the first flower. 


* Except after heat-poisoning,’when it remains constant, or rises slowly 
until cut by the falling temperature. 


‘HI DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT | 31 


Meanwhile, we must not forget that the night- 
temperature is commonly recorded as a minimum only, 
and that the true mean night-temperature may be some- 
what different. Moreover, the internal temperature of the 
tissues is appreciably affected by clouds, which check 
radiation. 

- Having now discussed the main factors which control 
growth during the first half of the season, we can turn to 
the examination of the water factor in more detail, since 
its importance will be considerable at a later date. Before 
so doing, an example may be studied which will remind 
us that the idiosyncrasies of the plant have to be taken as 
the base-line for all environmental effects. 

Length of the seedling stem.—That portion of 
the stem known as the hypocotyl, situated between the 
true root and the seed leaves, forms the greater part of 
the “root” which emerges from the seed-coats on 
germination. It is distinguished from the true root by 
the black speckling of resin glands. The length to which 
it attains after raising the cotyledons out of the soil 
would appear to be a matter of pure chance. Seed buried 
under clods of earth, or deeply sown, develops a stouter 
hypocotyl in reaction against the mechanical resistance ; 
much of the reserve food having been exhausted in the 
effort, the aérial portion of the hypocotyl is shorter, and 
the cotyledons smaller. 

A series of seedlings grown under uniform conditions 
showed that specific foundations were discernible in such 
a trivial character even as this. The strains employed 
were derived from an American Upland (King), and an 
Egyptian (Sultani). Having been soaked for a night at 
30°C. they were planted at a uniform depth of 2 cm., at 
uniform distances of 5 cm., in finely sifted soil which had 
been uniformly damped, and the hole which had been 
dibbled for each seed was filled by more fine soil without 
compression. The box containing the soil was kept in 


44 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cnap. 


the open air. Daily measurements of height were made, 
and the final length of the hypocotyl when growth in this 
region had ceased showed that the Upland exceeded the 
Egyptian by 50 per cent. under the field conditions of an 
Egyptian April. ‘I his excess was the more striking, in that 
the Upland seed was much smaller than the Egyptian, and 
a large seed usually displays a stronger “ field germina- 
tion” than a small one.” 

This difference became still more remarkable when the 
first internode developed above the cotyledons had also 
attained to its full length, for it completely reversed the 
hypocotyl length, being 50 per cent. longer in the Egyptian 
than in the Upland. The length of subsequent internodes 
is correlated with that of the first one, and since the 
internodes are developed at about the same time, the 
height of the plant is determined by the internode length 
unless other factors intervene, which we shall consider later. 

A repetition of this experiment in a cool greenhouse in 
England threw some light on the specific temperature- 
relationships. Under these conditions the Egyptian 
seedlings exceeded the American in all their dimensions, 
including the hypocotyl length. 

More detailed examination of the water-relationships 
which we have already encountered in the “sunshine 
effect” are now necessary, dividing the same into the two 
components, namely, absorption by the root and loss by 
the stem. 

The root.—The root first makes its appearance in 
germination at the end of the emerging hypocotyl as a 
zone of embryonic tissue about three millimetres in length. 
The growing zone is remarkably smal] throughout root- 
development. 

The primary root is positively geotropic, and its elonga- 
tion is indefinite. The plant is consequently tap-rooted, 
and the depth to which the root system extends is deter- 
mined by external conditions alone. The greatest depth 


Ul DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT — 33 


to which an unbroken tap-root has actually been followed 
is two metres and twenty centimetres. This depth had 
been attained between March 28th and September Ist, in 
soil where the sub-soil water level is four metres below the 
surface until September (Fig. 30). 

The growth of the tap-root is arrested or diverted 
horizontally upon arrival at saturated soil, and plants 
grown in land with a constant high sub-soil water level 
consequently possess insignificant tap-roots,* with a greater 
development of laterals. 

In case of injury to the growing point of the tap-root 
one or more of the lateral roots nearest the tip turns 
downward and replaces it. 

The resistance offered to root-growth by soils of normal 
texture appears to be negligible, both from the indirect 
evidence of growth-rates, and from actual observation in 
glass-sided boxes. 

The secondary roots normally begin to develop when the 
tap-root has attained a length of some 12 cm. Their 
original diameter is about half that of the tap-root, and 
roots of higher orders arise from them. Their rate of growth 
under the same environmental conditions is slower than 
that of their tap-root; this phenomenon is one of those 
commonplaces of observation which have never received a 
satisfactory explanation. In spite of their slower growth, 
they produce an enormous increase in root area, on account 
of their numbers, and if the soil is carefully washed away 
from a cluster of cotton seedlings about six weeks after 
sowing (Fig. 35), the root system appears as a tangled 
white gossamer web. Only a few of the rays of this web 
survive (Fig. 37). 

Before discussing the factors controlling root growth, we 
may advert to the general form of the root-system, which, 
beginning as a vertical line, rapidly becomes an inverted 


‘*® Audebeau. 


34 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


cone. When plants are sown at wide intervals, this conical 
form is maintained, the principal laterals extending radi- 
ally by the autumn to distances of over two metres 


Dec. 15th. or 8 months <_ 


+10 
metre 


Soi! 
surface 


T 


Y) tl 


A —1-0 
metre 


Dibposk 
Zonepregched 


Y 


VA yy LMM. 


Notes:- The new roots shown are those from 
a single lateral only. 
For effects of asphyxiation, see sowing 
of March 28th. in Fig.30. 


on this one root. 
Aged 36 days. 
Fic. 35.—Tue Root: DeveLormEent, ASPHYXIATION, AND REGENERATION. 


Scale drawings from measurements. 


(Fig. 37); the irregular base of the inverted cone thus 
becomes about five metres in diameter, while its depth 
may exceed two metres. When the plants are closely 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT - 35 


sown, as in the field crop, the uppermost laterals from 
adjacent plants begin to encroach on each other’s territory, 
within three months from the date of sowing; although 
interlacing takes place, the form of the effective root-system 
is modified by this lateral limitation into a cylindrical 
upper portion ending below ina cone. The depth of the 
cylindrical portion increases as lower and lower laterals 
come progressively into contact. If the downward ex- 
tension of the tap-root is checked, the conical portion is 
overgrown, and the whole root-system becomes a cylinder. 
The interest of this ‘root-interference” will become 
apparent later, when we find that plants in field crop 
behave as if they were “ pot-bound.” 

That the total volume of soil occupied by an adult 
cotton root must be enormous is shown by the examin- 
ation of pot plants. The photograph of Fig. 36 represents 
an average plant from sowings in six-litre pots after 
fourteen days; the tap-root had attained a length of 
16 cm. and was diverted by the floor of the pot after seven 
days only. Having been exposed to higher temperatures 
during the day than it would have experienced in the 
soil, the absolute size of the root is somewhat abnormally 
large, but the ratio of increase is interesting. After 
seven days the total root-length was 20cm. ; after fourteen 
days, two metres; after three weeks, four and a half 
metres. Yet the growth-curves from the plants during 
this last week showed that their root system was in- 
sutticient for the needs of the stem, though the total leaf 
area amounted to less than 30 sq. cm. 

On account of the more obvious importance of the 
root system at a later stage, we shall at present omit 
further discussion of its functions, but one experimental 
result might be mentioned. With plants growing in pots 
where the water content of the soil can be determined 
with certainty, we find no obvious relation between this 
factor of the environment and the growth of the stem 

D2 


36 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


during the night until the water content has sunk below 
a certain limit. Since deficient water-absorption is the 
real limiting factor of the sunshine effect, it follows that 
the size of the root-system is the true limiting factor of 
water-absorption, and that the humidity of the soil may 


Fic. 36.— SEEDLING. 


Fourteen days old. 


vary between wide limits without affecting it. Much 
more work needs to be conducted on this question, in 
view of its importance in irrigation practice. 

The rate of growth of the roots under field conditions is 
primarily controlled by temperature. Once the tap-root 


I DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT _ 37 


has passed into soil at constant temperature, containing 
perhaps 70 per cent. of the saturation quantity of water, 
the growth rate can safely be predicted. We have already 
examined the effect of temperature on root growth, and it 
suffices to add that the mean growth rate of many roots 
growing in soil in the laboratory works out at approxi- 
mately 0°9 mm. per hour at 18° C., and 1:25 mm. per 
hour at 22° C. When the seedlings under examination 
are placed out of doors, the total growth of the roots in 
twenty-four hours is considerably less than the calculated 
amount (see also Fig. 35), and it seems probable, although 
a complete experimental proof has not yet been obtained, 
that this diminution is due to the “sunshine effect,” 
which disturbs the water-equilibrium of the root conjointly 
with that of the stem. 

The rate of growth under field conditions is not easily 
ascertained. Small plants can be grown in boxes or tubes 
with glass sides, which are buried flush with the soil 
surface, and pulled up as often as may be necessary for 
examination of the root, which grows down the inclined 
glass side. For checks on such plants, and for examina- 
tion of all large plants, we have no method other than the 
primitive and muddy one of excavation with a jet of water 
and a trowel till the end of an unbroken root is reached. 
Measurements made by these methods have given data 


of which the following series is representative :— 
Length of true root. 


Sown ... .. . March 28... 0 
Measured ... ... April 2... 0... wee 6 cm. 
” SL aise ager timé’, eRe is 14 cm. 
45 ott hs May 15... 1... ou. 55 cm. 
a5 aaa! Liew July 1... 1... 140 cm. (abt.) 
5 pede aR September 1... ... 220 cm.+ 


From these it follows that the root-depth in well-drained 
soil certainly reaches two metres by the end of August.* 


* The lower soil-temperature in the Northern Delta should diminish the 
root-extension considerably. The point needs investigation on account of 
its intimate relation to drainage projects. 


38 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


Lastly we have to consider an abnormal limiting factor 
of root-growth, namely deficiency of soil-oxygen, usually 
due to water-logeing of the minute interstices which the 
soil contains. Owing to the fact that its anatomical 
structure does not include an elaborate system of inter- 
cellular air-spaces, such as aquatic plants possess, the 
cotton root is locally asphyxiated in water-logged soil, and 


Fie. 37.—Water Jer Excavation or Roots. 


See Fig. 35 on which the area of this photograph is marked. 
Lateral from neighbouring plant on right is marked with an X. 
Length, 170 cm. +. 


in a few weeks even the stout, woody roots are not merely 
dead, but decomposed. Here also we require precise 
information as to the degree of soil saturation which 
produces these effects under field conditions, but the main 
facts are perfectly clear, and we shall meet with the serious 
economic effects of this root-asphyxiation at frequent 
intervals. 

The stomata.—Certain plant physiologists have 


I DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT = 39 


expressed doubts as 
to the importance 


of the stomata in 
regulating transpir- 
ation, but such is 
certainly their 
function in the 
cotton plant. Con- 
sequently, an ex- 
amination of the 
stomatal move- 
ments, so far as 
they are at present 
known, is necessary 
to an understand- 
ing of the way in 
which the stem 
loses water. 

The stomata of 
Egyptian cotton 
plants are found 
on both surfaces of 
the cotyledons ; on 
the hypocotyl and 
stem, and on both 
surfaces of the foli- 
age leaves. 

A full grown 
stoma is about 0:04 
mm. in length, and 
the mean fre- 


quency of these 
organs in each 
square milli- 
metre has been 
found to be as 
follows. 


<— 144 em. 
below the surface 


y 


< 00y \dvy 


saocgevnes ean eniv ki gery 


perenne” 


Fic. 38.—REGENERATION 
OF THE Root-syYstEM. 


Highest level 
veached by 
sub-soil water 


Old dead roots 
threaded by 
new roots 


ew 


«<— 200 cm. below 
the surface 


Showing crop of new roots developed in six 
weeks from merely one uninjured lateral (the 
dotted line). Tracing from a blue-print of 
the root itself, after floating it upon a sheet 
of glass. See Fig. 35 and also 30, 


40 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


Cotyledon : Lower epidermis ... ... .-. «+ 275 
Upper 33 teh, idee Oe! Glee 200 
Hypocotyl and stem ...0 ...0 cee cue eee eee 20, &c. 
Leaf: Lower epidermis ... «0 ce. wee ee 176 to 116 
Upper _,, sielgy| RGR sates Weta! v a 97 to 44 


The total number of these apertures is consequently 
enormous. Such a seedling as that portrayed in Fig. 36, 
already possesses about half a million. Nevertheless, the 
cotton plant is not abnormally rich in stomata, though 
the fact that they are found on both sides of the leaf 
should be remembered. 

The functional capability of the immature stomata 
found in very young leaves is not clear. The cuticle of 
such leaves is yet thin, and in all probability it allows 
some evaporation to take place. The density of the 
stomata on such developing leaves is about the same as on 
adults, so that fresh stomata are continually being differ- 
entiated as the leaf expands. 

Further, with changes in the age of the leaf we find 
changes taking place in the degree of those reactions 
which the stomata exhibit towards environmental 
changes. These are by no means fully understood, and 
for the present we must confine our attention to the 
normal leaves, fully grown, but as yet showing no signs 
of senescence, which constitute the greater part of the 
leaf area. The principal observations upon which this 
account is based were made during May, June, and July. 

The study of changes in stomatal aperture under field 
conditions has formerly been impracticable except by 
personal observation, which almost precludes continuity 
in the records. The author succeeded, however, in 
adapting Mr. Francis Darwin’s Porometer method,* to a 
self-recording system, and the first continuous automatic 
records of stomatal aperture were thus obtained. 

In the Porometer, the leaf is made to seal an air-tight 


* Darwin and Pertz. 


i = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT — $41 


chamber, within which the pressure is higher or lower 
than that of the atmosphere. The air-flow, restoring 
equilibrium of pressure, can thus take place only through 
the stomata and mesophyll tissues, while the square root 
of the velocity of this flow is approximately directly 
proportional to the stomatal aperture. 

The author’s Stomatograph*® consists of a sensitive 
electric air-pump, which maintains a constant pressure 
gradient between the chamber and the outside air, 
signalling the time of completion of every stroke—and 
hence the stomatal aperture—on a chronograph drum. 
The pump, with its operating battery and a relay, is 
contained in a small dust-proof box, placed below the 
plant under examination. From this box issues 
the tube leading to the leaf-chamber, and also a 
telegraph wire which leads from the relay to the chron- 
ograph ; the latter may be at any convenient distance, 
preferably in the field laboratory. The instrument is 
independent of any meteorological change or disturbance. 

In the usual simple experiments, we find that 
desiccation, darkness, and poisons cause closure, while 
sunlight causes the stomata to open to their maximum 
aperture. 

The records obtained from normal leaves in field 
conditions, which in one case extended over five con- 
secutive days with the same leaf (Fig. 39), reveal a most 
fascinating interplay of factors. During the night the 
stomata are completely closed; they begin to open 
slowly at dawn, and continue to do so until a moderate 
aperture has been attained, even in diffuse light. When 
direct sunlight strikes the leaf, the aperture is rapidly 
increased, till maximum is reached at about 9 a.m. 
This maximum aperture is maintained for a varying 
period, the length of which is undoubtedly determined by 
the water-absorption of the root, provided that sunshine be 
continuous. Immediately after irrigation it may last two 


42 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


or three hours, while on hot, dry, windy days, with a 
soil approaching to physiological dryness, the full aperture 
has scarcely been attained before closure sets in. Such 
facts indicate that the closure which follows must be due 
to “water-supply shortage,” and that its utility is to 
check the excessive water-loss involved by free transpir- 
ation. By noon, on most summer days, this closure is 


Sun-shine 
Sun-| | “ | 


rise 
Dark | j 


Sun- 


Sun behind trees set 
i.e. diffused tight o ny | Dark 


J 
o 
> 


%& Screened whole plant 
from direct sun. 


Zero. 
dune 8th. 


—_ 
= 
—] 
( 
= 
dune 9th. /) ‘ 


dune 10th, / | 


a 
= 
Ss 
13 
oO 
a 
J : Vane 12thN 
dune 11th. ex 


effused 
per minute 


UNIT i 
Tec. of air 


dune 12th. ne 
Mid- 6 Noon 6 Mid- 
night am. pm night 


Fic. 39.—StomatocrarH REceRDs. 


Curves show volume of air driven through an area of 80 sq. num. of leaf per 
: minute, under a pressure of 1 mm. of mercury. 


Five-day record on the same leaf without alteration of apparatus. Fifth day 
is abnormal. 


almost complete, and we shall revert to its effects on 
transpiration and photo-synthesis when considering these 
functions. 

On cloudy days, or when a screen is placed across the 
plane of the ecliptic so as to cut off all direct sun from 
the whole plant, the maximum aperture is not attained, 


1 = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT — 43 


but a moderate aperture persists throughout the day, 
followed (Fig. 39, June 8th, from noon onwards) by 
slow closure in the late afternoon, and complete closure 
at sunset. In such circumstance the illumination is 
the controlling factor, and there is no water-shortage ; 
this might be expected from consideration of the fact 
that the existing root-system has been developed to 
cope with the demands of sunny weather. 

If this very plausible hypothesis of diurnal water- 
shortage be correct, it must mean that the water-content 
of the soil which is in juxtaposition with the roots has been 
reduced at a greater rate than that at which water can be 
restored by capillarity. During the night there must be 
a purely physical movement of water into these semi- 
desiccated portions of soil, since the water-shortage is not 
apparent on the following morning. We thus obtain 
from the Stomatograph some conception of the severe 
strain which the plant undergoes during the torrid 
weather of a summer in Egypt. 

The verb “to vegetate” is frequently misused as a 
description of inert torpidity, but the daily experiences of 
a cotton plant in Egypt almost justify this libellous 
employment of the word. From noon onwards, this long- 
suffering plant is neither growing, nor feeding, nor 
transpiring beyond the necessary minimum, and possibly 
not even breathing properly. 

The supremely injurious effect of fogs has long been an 
article of the cotton grower’s faith. It is difficult to see 
any reason for this conviction, apart from the continued 
low temperature which morning fogs entail, but it is 
possible that the blocking of the stomata by condensed 
water may have a prejudicial effect. Even so, a fog 
should merely postpone the brief period of general activity 
of the plant by a few hours, and not actually curtail that 
period. On the whole it seems safer to adhere for the 
present to the cynical explanation that most “fog” is 


44 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


boll-worm, while the rest is either mere spoiling of the 
seed-cotton in the open boll, or else a simple reduction of 
temperature. . 

Transpiration.—We have examined the principal 
machinery by which the water-loss of the plant is 
controlled and it now remains to ascertain what the 
amount of this loss may be under field conditions. 

On this subject we are profoundly ignorant, owing to 
the experimental difficulties, and the present section is 
intended rather to indicate the possible lines of attack 
than to attempt a statement. 

The usual methods of investigation are divided into 
gravimetric and volumetric determinations, which may be 
used to summarise the net result of a long period, such as 
a day, or to investigate the effects of a particular set of 
factors at a given moment. Direct weighings of the plant 
are feasible in the earliest stages, but we have seen that a 
plant aged three weeks, growing in a six-litre pot, is 
already abnormal. Further, we shall come later to 
evidence which shows that two plants growing in an iron 
cylinder 2 metres high and 80 cm. in diameter, are 
suffering from root limitation by the middle of July; 
since similar signs are shown by close-sown plants in field 
crop, the objection is not fatal, but the conditions cannot 
be regarded as normal. Furthermore, such isolated plants 
have room to develop all the branches they produce, and 
their leaf area is consequently much larger than that of a 
field plant. Lastly, being isolated, they are freely 
exposed to wind, and this rapid removal of saturated air 
must increase transpiration enormously. ‘The only serious 
attempt. at determinations by weighing large tanks was 
carried out by M. Audebeau. The objections just mentioned 
apply to this excellent series of observations, especially 
after June, when the field plants are beginning to produce 
a ‘“‘surface climate.” The discrepancy between M. 
Audebeau’s total transpiration and the actual state of 


II DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 45 


affairs was strikingly shown to the author by Mr. J. I. 
Craig, who computed that on this basis the whole Nile 
flood would be lost through the transpiration of the cotton 
crop alone ! 

It may be possible, however, to obtain data from plants 
growing under nearly normal field conditions, by under- 
pinning large masses of earth to form concrete tanks in 
the middle of a field of cotton, and determining the fall 
of the water-table in these tanks from day to day. The 
method is open to many objections, but it lends itself to 
automatic recording, and if regarded in part as a problem 
in soil physics, the results should form a near approxima- 
tion to the truth. It is not however suitable for examina- 
tion of the diurnal variation. 

For the problems of diurnal change it is usual to 
employ the Potometer, which compares the velocities of 
intake of water by means of a tube intercalated in the 
cut stem. This method has not been persuaded to work 
in Egypt owing to the severity of the sunshine effect, 
which promptly kills the severed stem. 

The only method which holds out any prospect of 
utility is the least obviously practical of any. It consists 
in cutting off portions of plant tissue of known area, and 
weighing them repeatedly on a Joly spring balance as 
soon as possible after cutting. The weighing is done in 
the field, usually under difficulties due to the wind, and 
the balance is set up so that the tissue shall remain in 
the same position which it occupied before being cut off. 
Even whole plants may be treated in this way and 
measured up with a planimeter afterwards. The curve 
of weight-diminution in time is then plotted backwards 
to the moment of cutting, and its value at that moment 
is assumed to be the true transpiration rate. This is then 
converted for purposes of comparison into milligrammes 
per square centimetre per minute. 

The few determinations yet made in this way have 


46 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


given consistent results, four of which have been plotted 
in Fig. 40. They show that transpiration is practically 
in abeyance at night, slow in the early morning. By 
9 a.m. in sunshine it has reached a maximum which is 
maintained till past noon. The last result is perhaps 
rather unexpected, seeing that the stomata are nearly 


0150p— ' 
_ as 
a res Tw, 
. OY Re) ~~ 0 
‘ <5 | —.%o 
: My 
6 em ~._ ve ye 
0-100 2 ae Ss, ay 
a a oo aves 
”, aN “ee 
a ee 
(7) 
 & 
Sed, 
SN 2, 
S 
z é 1%, 
3s Sn 
Sa 
5 c—) 
93 
i] 
= 
10) 5 6 


2 3 4 
Minutes (from moment of removal) 


Fig. 40.—TRANSPIRATION IN FIELD Crop. 


Rate of water-loss from detached leaves, plotted backwards to instant of 
removal. 


Initial weight of all four was about 0°85 gram ; areas, 30-40 sq. cm. 


Time. Wet Bulb. Dry Bulb. 
9°50 a.m, 25°6° 28°4° 
125 p.m. 23°9 32'8 


closed, but it is easily explained when we remember the 
increase in stringency of the environment which has 
taken place during these four hours: Sun-temperature 
has risen from about 50°C. to 75° C., shade-temperature 
from about 25° C. to 35° C., and humidity has fallen 
from about 60 per cent. to 20 ‘per cent. of saturation. 
During the afternoon the transpiration rate appears to fall 


11 DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 47 


steadily, but the shape of the curve is only known 
approximately as yet. 

The rate of mean maximum transpiration obtained in 
these trials was 000076 g. per sq. cm. per minute, which 
seems to be within the order of probability. A trial with 
an entire plant in the same way indicated a rate of 0:0003 
at midday on June 15th, many of the leaves being shaded 
by others; there were twelve leaves, with a total area of 
585 sq. cm., the wet and dry bulbs reading 24° C. and 
33° C. respectively. 

Tissue temperatures.—A number of records of the 
internal temperatures of various tissues have been taken 
by inserting a thin copper-constant in thermo-electric 
couple in the tissues;* it is then balanced upon a 
similar couple bedded in a rod of paraffin wax, which 
is kept at shade temperature behind a screen close 
to the plant. The actual shade temperature is simul- 
taneously recorded by means of a thermograph near the 
control couple. 

Since the shade temperatures form the standard of com- 
parison between various sites, this method is preferable to 
direct determinations of absolute tissue temperature. The 
difference between the two couples is automatically 
recorded by a ‘‘ Thread Galvanometer,” a zero line being 
first traced in order to show when the couples are at the 
same temperature. 

The results obtained in this way present a few features 
of exceptional interest. Variations of +1:0°C. are shown 
even by large bolls, while the stem within five millimetres 
of the terminal bud varies in the same way as the 
younger leaves, though with less amplitude. Young 
leaves, which have not attained to a third of their ultimate 
length, rarely exceed the shade temperature, but frequently 
fall below it, their extreme variation being about + 0° to 


* Blackman & Matthaei. 


48 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


— 6° (Fig. 414). Old leaves, on the other hand, rarely fall 
below air-temperature but frequently rise above it, varying 
from — 3° to + 10° (Fig.41c). These oscillations in leaf- 
temperature are extremely rapid, differences of 10°C. 
being recorded often at intervals of only a minute. 

The thermo-regulation of the leaf seems to diminish 
with age, and it is not inconceivable that the senescence of 
a leaf may thus be hastened by thermotoxic effects. In 
general terms, the old leaf follows the sun-temperature, 
but the younger leaf follows the wet-bulb temperature. 
Puffs of wind, whether natural or artificial, produce no 
notable effect on the old leaf, but reduce the temperature 
of young leaves. 

Thus it follows that in considering the effect of 
maximum day-temperatures on growing tissues, we were 
justified in taking the shade-temperatures as the 
maximum tissue temperatures. 

That thermo-regulation is real may be seen by comparison 
of Fig. 414 and Fig. 418. The two records were taken from 
the same tissue, at an interval of twelve days, during 
which the vascular tissue had been destroyed by a “ boll- 
worm.” The top of the stem wilted in the usual way 
and became dry, and the recording couple inside showed 
most erratic oscillations of temperature, due solely to the 
intermittent cloudiness of the sky. 

The night-temperature of tissues is practically identical 
with the air-temperature, excepting for variations of about 
2° C., which have been shown to be caused by clouds, 
checking radiation. ‘The effect is not an important one. 

Fogs cause no noticeable alteration in leaf-temperature, 
so that any chilling effect they may have is directly 
recorded by the thermometer. 

The most important result obtained from these records 
is one which relates to the effect of water-shortage on the 
temperatures, through reduction of transpiration, and 
consequent loss of thermo-regulation. On account of the 


DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT = 49 


Lt 


‘urd F [GUN seat} YSnoIYy spavasoyyy uns queygTUsezUT “wd QZ'ZT [9 “W'e OS's Woay uns [[Nz 04 pasodxa og 


‘IoyowMouRAles preity “['S'O 
® pue sepdnoo ofyo9[a-owlteyy UeWyoYTg Jo suvewt Aq “(or0z) ae yuoelpe Jo amnyereduiay epeys oy} uodn peourreg 


‘SdAVaT JO GUALVUAINGT, TVWNUGTIN[— '[P “OLA 


juaosauas fngisia jou'foa) PIO’) 
01 6 8 L 9 ¢ % € z ' Gin Pl] 6 8 “ 9 $ ’ € t ! M 8 


50 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


varying nature of such controlling factors as clouds and 
sun-temperature and the age of the leaf, it is not very easy 
to demonstrate the progressive effect produced by desicca- 
tion of the soil over a period of many days. Mimicry of 
this progressive change by sudden root-pruning may be re- 
garded as tolerably just, and the effect of such pruning is 
to cause all but the youngest leaves to behave like old 
ones; they are easily over-heated, and where they had 
formerly held their temperature down below that of the air, 
they now exceed the air temperature by several degrees. 
Hence nearly all the plant tissues suffer from over-heating 
during the day. The bearing of this fact on our interpreta- 
tion of the fall in growth-rate which follows water-shortage 
in July will shortly be mentioned. 

Another method of demonstrating this loss of thermo- 
regulation is simply to examine the tissue-temperature 
record of a young leaf during a day when the stomata 
had closed at an early hour. ‘This temperature-trace. 
starts below the air-temperature line and slowly rises up 
to it, or above it. Differences of not less than 5° C. in 
mean relative tissue-temperature may thus be produced 
by stomatal closure. 

Photosynthesis.—We can scarcely leave the general 
physiology of the cotton plant without some reference to 
this prime function, but a critical and exhaustive series of 
data has yet to be obtained. 

The first attempts at obtaining such a series by the 
Sachs-Thoday* dry-weight method were rendered fruitless 
by the unexpected high error of a-symmetry in cotton 
leaves. The probable error of difference between 
nominally identical areas of 15 sq. cm., cut from the right 
and left sides of the central segment, amounts to 
+ 4 per cent. of the mean weight of each pair. Hence 
at least sixteen pairs have to be examined in each 


* Thoday, D. 


i = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 51 


experiment if a result with a probable error of 
+ 1:0 per cent. is to be obtained. 

The evidence to hand indicates that photosynthesis 
takes place largely in the early morning, the subsequent 
closure of the stomata preventing free access of CO, to the 
chloroplasts. The curve of increase in dry-weight follows 
the temperature curve till nine o'clock, and then the 
stomatograph record, with differences in detail between 
old leaves and young ones during the afternoon. 

The increase in dry-weight in hourly series of observa- 
tions, without correction for loss by translocation, has 
given record values at the highest point of the curve, 
namely 25 (-+ 4) mg. per sq. decim. per hour. This rate 
is reached in June, between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m., when the 
stomata are at their maximum dilatation, and the tempera- 
ture is above 30°C. There is reason to believe that values 
of about 30 mg. may yet be obtained under certain con- 
ditions, thus reaching ‘the absorption of a surface of KOH 
when exposed freely to the wind. 

It is improbable that the intensity of illumination should 
ever be a limiting factor in the process, except before 
sunrise. 

No definite signs of growth-limitation by deficient 
photosynthesis have yet been discovered, unless in such 
circumstances as the last three hours of Fig. 34, though 
here again we ultimately may find some such effect in 
the autumn. , 

The first flower.—The date of appearance of the first 
flower on any individual plant deserves consideration in a 
separate section ; being the ultimate result of a long series 
of interacting factors, morphological and physiological, it 
is in itself an automatic summary of their effects and it 
possesses the additional distinction of being commercially 
important. The “date of arrival of the crop” is almost 
entirely dependent on the “ first-flower date,” but the 


grower does not seem to realise that he is given nearly two 
E 2 


52 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


months’ clear warning as to whether his crop will be late 
or early. Specific differences between various strains of 
cotton depend in the first instance on the method of 
branching. If the first branches of the young plant are 
sympodial flowering shoots, the flowering will probably 
be early. Sometimes, however, strains have been noticed 
which ought to have been early but were actually late, 
owing to a propensity for shedding the unopened flower 
buds. Again, specific differences due to branching may 
take the form of irregularity ; all the plants of some strains 
in the author's possession (notably King Upland), come into 
flower almost simultaneously, even if some are stunted ; 
other strains show a wide scatter among plants which 
appear to be equally healthy. Other, and more subtle, 
differences can only be relegated to the protoplasm itself 
for ultimate explanation, some strains developing identical 
flowering branches at a much slower rate than their 
neighbours, just as the lateral roots grow more slowly than 
the tap-root under the same environmental conditions. 

A point of importance, which is still obscure, relates to 
the influence of the environment upon the nature of the 
branch arising from a bud. In certain circumstances, 
not yet clearly understood, but apparently including 
excessively high night-temperatures, the plant delays its 
formation of flowering branches. In many cases the delay 
is only apparent, the flower buds being formed but soon 
shed. In others it is real; ‘ Nyam-nyam Kidney ” 
cotton grown at Giza, though otherwise healthy and 
growing strongly, forms very few flowering branches. 

When dealing with most pure strains we find consider- 
able uniformity in the date of the first flower. The 
stunted plants, if any, flower late, so that a close corre- 
lation here exists between the height of the young stem 
and the flowering-date. Curiously enough, however, this 
correlation vanishes when we reach the normal plants, 
which all flower at about the same time in spite of notice- 
able fluctuations in height. 


1 = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 53 


Another form of the same phenomenon is presented 
when we examine data for plants sown at varying times. 
This was first recognised by the author when plotting 
data for sowing and picking-dates in a series of years, 
provided from various large estates in Egypt. The graph 
was interesting as showing the influence of district on 
sowing-date, and on picking-date in consequence, but 
more especially so because it indicated—in spite of the 
many sources of error—that it is useless to sow before a 
certain critical date in any given district. However early 
or late the sowing may be, the crop “arrives” at the 
same mean time until this limiting date is exceeded, after 
which a delay in “arrival” results, following the delay in 
sowing. Ultimately, of course, the paraboloid “ arrival- 
curve” will leave the “sowing-curve,” since plants sown 
absurdly late will not: flower at all. 

The same phenomenon was shown on a smaller scale, 
though with greater precision, by weekly sowings on a single 
site in a single season. The mean date of the first 
flower was actually slightly later in the earliest sowing, on 
account of the larger number of stunted plants. Three 
Upland sowings indicated the same behaviour as the 
Egyptians, but within a shorter period. Sowings made 
on the critical date were not merely superior in arrival, 
but also in height, in yield, and in all respects. 

We cannot, of course, lay down rigid rules as to the 
date on which to sow in any place, since the weather 
varies a little from year to year. Nevertheless it seems 
clear that the tendency in Egypt is towards sowing too 
soon. Thus, March 24 was the critical date for Gizain 1911. 

The variations in night-temperature from year to year 
during the six weeks before flowering probably constitute 
the chief cause of variations in first-flower date, and hence 
in crop arrival, since the growth-rates of all the branches 
are closely correlated until June. There have recently 
been two striking examples of this in the early crop of 
1910 and the late one of 1911. 


CHAPTER III 
DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT—II 


THE second half of the development of the cotton plant in 
Egypt may be conveniently subdivided into three stages, 
though none of these have any definite boundaries. They 
are, successively, the critical period, the water-table period, 
and the autumnal period. The first of these three is little 
more than an abstract term which has been found useful 
in discussion, while the other two explain themselves. 

The chief feature of all three, though especially of the 
first two, is that the main control of the environment has 
been transformed from the air to the soil (Fig. 30). This 
change can be seen clearly in the growth curve. During 
the first period, under the modern conditions of Egyptian 
irrigation, the plant can always be supplied with sufficient 
water, but the adjustment of the water-supply becomes a 
very delicate matter during the critical period, owing to 
root-interference ; while excess of water is likely to be 
present during the next period, partly from natural causes, 
and hence reduction in the effective root-system follows. 
When the sub-soil water period is very early, and con- 
sequently overlays the critical period, the combination of 
the two produces disastrous effects, of which the 1909 
crop was our worst example, through an early and high 
flood. 

During these three periods the maturation of the crop 
takes place. We are chiefly concerned with the flower, and 
with the boll which ripens from it, though also with the 

54 


cH. DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 55 


boll which does not ripen. We should also be able to 
discuss the growth phenomena shown by the lint in the 
boll, but the experimental difficulties of such investiga- 
tion have not yet been overcome, and this section of the 
development, which is of prime interest to the spinner, 
must be left almost blank. 

Methods of observation.—So far as this part of 
the research has at present been carried, the author has 
had to devise methods in which the accuracy of the 
individual observation is low, while the ultimate precision 
of the result isdue to multiplication of such observations. 
Thus, averages are worked out for a large number of plants 
and expressed in terms of “‘ per plant per day” (abbreviated 
for convenience to “p.p.p.d.”), with respect to such 
characters as the opening of flowers, the ripening of bolls, 
the shedding of flowers, and the growth rate. 

The results are usually plotted in graphic form for 
convenience in examination. 

The lack of moderately trustworthy assistance in Egypt 
often makes it necessary to arrange the time-table of work 
so as to have daily observations on special plants and 
groups for three days, then for three days more on another 
series, and to take those families where the number of 
plants is large, such as variety-rows, only once a week, 
depending on the greater number of component individuals 
to compensate for the scarcity of observations. All these 
observations can be plotted down to the same “ p.p.p.d.” 
basis, and are directly comparable with the results obtained 
by daily observation, or from large areas. 

The task of working data up at any stage is lessened by 
tabulating note-books at the beginning of the season, 
though the balance between minimum discomfort in the 
field, and facility at the writing-desk, is not always easy 
to strike. The speed of desk-work can often be greatly 
increased by preparing nomographs to take the place of 
the slide-rule. 


56 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


A natural outcome of these methods of observation has 
been the employment of some of the simpler tools of the 
statistician. The author having for some years depended 
on detailed observation of random rows whereby to obtain 
expressions for the behaviour of plots in ordinary culti- 
vation, was particularly interested when Prof. Wood and 
Mr. Stratton combined data and treatment in a critical 
discussion of field experiment methods. The appearance 
of their article implies that science has at last been intro- 
duced into agricultural field experiments, and an examin- 
ation of the available data respecting cotton should 
therefore be profitable. The figures for the yield of 
nominally identical plots in Egypt are too scanty to 
provide a definite statement of the probable error; those 
available work out to a probable error of + 6 per cent. of 
the mean yield for the total yield of half acre plots ; the 
same figure in the case of Wood and Stratton’s investi- 
gations for English crops was -& 5 per cent. 

The difficulty of obtaining identical plots of Egyptian 
cotton, even in the same field, is extreme, since great varia- 
tions in the physical texture of the sub-soil are normal, 
which involve similar differences in the water-supply of 
the roots, when they have penetrated thereto, though the 
surface soil may appear to be uniform. Consequently, we 
are not justified in expecting the Probable Error (P.E.) of 
Egyptian cotton plots to be any lower than that of plots of 
English wheat and we may take + 6 per cent. as a very 
liberal estimate of the accuracy of cotton plot experiments 
in Egypt. Taking odds of 30:1 as practical certainty it 
follows that two plots of different varieties grown 
for comparison side by side may show yields of four 
kantars and six kantars respectively, and will yet give us 
no justification for stating that the greater yield is due to 
the superiority of one variety over another. 

This is a very unsatisfactory state of things, since much 
money has obviously been wasted in trying such useless 


mr DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT _ 57 


experiments. If further application of Wood and 
Stratton’s analysis can be made to enhance the precision 
of cotton experiments, the attempt is worth making. 

The method of examining single rows and computing 
to single plants is capable of high precision. The 
examination can be carried out daily, weekly, or casually, 
and may be extended to any observable character, or 
restricted to mere pickings of the ripe cotton. In the 
latter case it is actually less laborious than the ordinary 


T__,, T Total Yield eae 


eZ 25-1 bolls £0 
eal Sakel 18-5 ,, +0-6 
SOC __assiti 19:9, «= £08 
3 --- Volts 174 , 04 rN 
3 ‘ 9 
Sos 7 Ps 
rr (mn, ce) (emee >» 
g opt fond s 
2 ee al y = ‘ 
ae 7 eee PING 
nn, Se (ee de | ore i | | +> 
s oP ats | IN 
904 — 3 = 
a Pca en | (| (i 
Week August September October 
ending 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 


Fic, 42.—ComPaRiIson OF VARIETIES. 


Yield expressed as bolling-curve per mean plant. 
Six scattered groups of 30-40 plants per variety. 


method, since smaller quantities have to be dealt with. 
Confining attention to total yield only, the author 
obtained a series of data from double rows of five varieties, 
badly cultivated on an extremely irregular strip of land 
(Fig. 42). Comparing two adjacent rows of the same 
variety, each comprising from 25 to 35 plants in the row, 
and expressing the differences in terms of the mean yield 
per plant for the two rows, the final figure for nineteen 
such pairs gave a P.E. of + 5°5 per cent. for number of 
bolls, or 6°8 per cent. for weight of seed cotton. Two 
little rows growing side by side, of 30 plants each, may 
thus be made to give as good a comparison for the 


58 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


particular locality between, e.g., two varieties, as can be 
obtained from plots of any dimensions whatever, while 
by taking more pairs we increase the precision of our 
comparison to such an extent that mean divergences of 
only 5 per cent. cannot be due to accident. 

Having obtained from these and from similar small-scale 
records some definite expression of the precision of the 
“‘ observation-row method,” and knowing approximately 
the limitations of plot trials, we are in a position to 
arrange future tests of varieties, manures, waterings, 
sowing-distances, sowing-dates, &c., with a definite fore- 
knowledge of the significance of our results. 

The growth-curve.—Records of the growth of the 
main stem have already been discussed with respect to the 
controlling factors up to the end of June. After this date 
we begin to perceive remarkable differences between various 
strains of cotton plants. Thus, on the same piece of land, 
and in the same season, by weekly or fortnightly measure- 
ments of the height, made to the nearest five centimetres 
with a graduated rod; we obtain mean growth-curves like 
those of Fig. 43, plotted from families of King American 
Upland, Egyptian Afifi, Egyptian Sultani, and com- 
mercial Afifi. The first ceases to grow during June, the 
second during August, while the third continues at a fairly 
uniform growth-rate until October. In the third case we find 
on examination at the end of the season that the length of 
the internodes is uniform throughout the adult stem. 
In the case of American Upland only a few internodes of 
uniform length are produced, after which some half-dozen 
of decreasing length result in total cessation of growth 
from the terminal bud of the main stem. The Afifi strain 
behaves in the same way, but less suddenly, and at a later 
date. These compressed internodes contain abnormal 
quantities of calcium oxalate crystals. 

Until more detailed investigation of the growth-rates of 
various portions of the same plant has been completed, 


mt = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT ~ 59 


there is little profit in discussion of the phenomenon. It 
should be mentioned, however, that—so far as the avail- 
able data go—the cause seems certainly to be a form of 
Thermotoxy, local in, and peculiar to, the particular 
growing point. The differences between the various strains 
thus are reduced to a specific susceptibility to thermic 
effects, either in the form of increased ‘ x-production,” or 
deficient “x-destruction.” The view does not claim to 


20-0 
’ ST 

> / +. TN y, 
3s / Y 
= a 1 ] \ —— é 

rt \ 
2 ARK | Ni ' I sce 
S N ‘ 
= 10-0 aie 8 
P=) ra oF % 
8 a's NJ ~ ‘ 
S N, A ' 
> N77 N \ 
2 50 
= le NEN 

Ns, 

Week dune duly August September October 
ending 11 18 25 2 2 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 


Fig. 43.—Spreciric GROWTH-HABIT. 


Mean growth-curves for central axis from various families in same year and 
on same plot. 


K. King Upland. S. Sultani. Af. Afifi. a’. Afifi, stunted plants only. 
C. Commercial Afifi in field crop. 


be an explanation, but it at least offers the prospect 
of an answer to the question. 

Leaving these specific differences, and confining our 
attention to the Afifi type of growth-curve just figured, 
which is fairly representative of the Egyptian cottons, we 
can return to the effects of the environment proper. ‘The 
curve showing the mean growth per day of the terminal 
bud of ten plants of Afifi (Fig. 30, growth), from 
which we have already demonstrated the effects of 
night-temperature, now becomes still more interesting. 
After June 15th there is a slight indication of a 


60 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


lag in the growth-rate behind the night-temperature 
control. After June 26th this lag develops rapidly 
into the dominant feature of the curve, and some 
factor is obviously at work which leads to a general 
and progressive falling off of the growth-rate. A part 
of this degrading is probably of the chemical nature 
indicated above, which results in a decreased range of 
sensitivity in the growing protoplasm; some such 
inferiority would account for the slower growth of lateral 
roots. To postulate such “deadening” of response is not 
inadmissible, since it has often been noted in the fungus 
studies,” where two hyphe in the same field, with the 
same temperature relationships, were yet found to grow at 
proportionally different rates, whatever their temperature 
might be. In these same studies it was also found that 
such decrease in the growth-rate sometimes appeared as 
the result of short exposure to high temperatures, too 
short to affect the stopping-point.* 

Such general slowing down of the growth-rate will not 
cover all the observed facts, for if we smooth the growth- 
records to the basis of such an assumption, we find that 
the formerly preponderant influence of night-temperatures 
on the daily growth is rapidly vanishing. On the other 
hand we find that the actual records show a long-period 
modality, corresponding to the intervals between the 
waterings ; growth attains its maximum from two to five 
days after watering. Obviously the root-absorption is 
partially involved, probably indirectly through thermo- 
toxy, or auto-toxy of some other kind, and also through a 
partial and temporary suppression of the sunshine effect. 

These soil-water effects disappear in their turn after the 
middle of September, when—in the particular series under 
discussion—the infiltration water from the river raised the 
water-table and smothered the roots. By this time, how- 


* Loe, cit.,9 ‘‘ Triple curve.” 


ur DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT - 61 


ever, the main axis had reduced its growth-rate below even 
that which was possible under these conditions, and the 
effects of root-asphyxiation are shown by the laterals only, 
as in the flowering-curve. 

A peculiar confirmation of the interpretation just given 
as to the influence of the soil-water in July is shown by 
the growth-curves of families sown at different times. 
During the week ending on June 26th, 1911, a depression 
of the growth-rate was recorded in the oldest family, while 
the oldest but one showed it in a less marked form. The 
remaining families were unaffected. When we consider 
that the earlier the plant is sown, the larger its root-system 
must be, we see that the drying-effect of the early plants 
on the soil surrounding them will be more severe than in 
the case of the later plants, and hence they will show the 
soil-water limiting effect at an earlier date. 

The flowering-curve.—As in the case of the growth- 
curve, we meet with specific differences in the manner of 
distribution of flower-production in time. The beginning 
of the curve, as the date of appearance of the first flower, 
has already been discussed. 

The specific differences in growth-reaction to environ- 
ment, which we have just discussed, affect the form of this 
curve also. Thus, owing to the habit of “ early growth- 
cessation” taking place first in the oldest bud, namely, the 
terminal one, and then progressively in the younger ones, the 
growth of the flowering branches is checked in the strain 
of King Uplands by the end of July, and no flowers open 
during August or September. By the end of August a 
plant of King appears to be dead, but ‘the flower- 
ing begins again in October, and a second crop of bolls 
may be produced from these flowers. The Egyptian 
Sultani strain already mentioned, with its continuous 
growth-habit, continues to flower throughout the season, 
while the usual Egyptian flowering-curve rises to a 
maximum in the beginning of August, and then descends 


62 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cnap. 


steadily till the winter. The form of the later part of the 
curve is usually modified by subsoil water effects, either 
through root-asphyxiation, or by continuously shallow soil, 
which accentuates thermo-toxic effects through water- 
shortage. 

The actual form of the curve is also determined by the 
branching-habit, since the flowers are produced by special 
branches. For our purpose it is not worth while to enter 
into detailed discussion of these branches and their effect 
on the utility of the plant; they have been closely 
investigated by Mr. Leake.* Their general effect on the 
flowering-curve may be seen best in second generation 
hybrids ; continuous growth without lateral mynopodial 
branches, resulting in a straight stem bearing sympodial 
flowering branches only, produces a flowering-curve which 
remains low and without modes throughout the season. 
The substitution of discontinuous growth-habit in com- 
bination with the same habit of branching, cuts out a 
resting-period from this curve. Discontinuous growth 
with free vegetative monopodial branches at the base of 
the stem, which in their turn produce sympodia, causes 
the flowering-curve to run up to a high mode, then to fall 
rapidly to zero, and to rise again in the autumn. Similar 
branching to this, but combined with continuous growth- 
habit, builds up an enormous flowering-curve, which rises 
steadily to a maximun (not infrequently amounting to 
25 p.p.p.d. flowers), and then descends to the winter. A 
total production of five hundred flowers in a month is 
common among plants possessing this last combination 
of habits. 

Confining our attention again to the usual Egyptian 
type of flowering-curve, the normal form of this may be 
affected by the environment through the growth-processes, 
but it is frequently important to remember that a normal 
form exists, since these distortions often serve as useful 


* Leake (? 3), 


mt DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 63 


indications of environmental changes, and especially of 
changes in the condition of the root-system. A concise 
example is provided by the flowering-curve of plants 
growing in the two-metre cylindrical tanks already 
mentioned, when compared with similar wide-sown plants 
growing in ordinary soil near by, and with others growing 
under the close-sown conditions of the field crop (Fig. 44). 
The curves shown were all taken in the same year, and 
all from an area of a quarter acre, cultivated in these 
various ways with the same pure strain. Taking the 


June, July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. 


D 


Flowers per plant per day 
ix) 
[o) 


3 
ae 


Wide Planting ——-——Field Crop) -----Tank Plants 
Fic. 44.—FLowerine Curves. Guiza. 1910. 


Showing root-limitation of tank-plants equally with field-sowings. 
Note the smaller effect of root-asphyxiation in the wide-sowings. 


wide-sown plants as nearest to normal development, we 
see that field-planting reduces the number of flowers 
formed, presumably by the crowding of the flowering 
branches, and hence reduces the height of the maximum. 
Comparing these plants with the wide-sown ones grown 
in the tanks, we find that the ascending flowering-curve 
is checked under the latter conditions, and is not allowed 
to continue at the normal maximum. Obviously a 
limiting factor has supervened, and it is more than 
probable that this factor is the limitation of root-develop- 
ment through the confinement of the roots within the 
limited capacity of the tanks. An interesting side issue 


64 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


of this result is the inevitable deduction that two cotton 
plants can occupy more than three tons of soil with 
their roots by the end of July. In making a further 
comparison of the tank-plants with those sown in field- 
conditions, we find in the latter a similar arrest of the 
rising curve, which is probably to be explained in the 
same way, as due to root-limitation, formerly discussed. 

Such variations as those just mentioned may be produced 
within the same pure strain in at least two ways; either 
by checks upon the growth of the flowering branches, 
or by shedding of the flower-buds. The latter falls. 
into the same category as the shedding of flowers 
or bolls, but should be mentioned here as a possible 
source of variation in the flowering- curve. With 
certain strains, notably one bred by the author from 
an Egypto- American cross, this effect is marked 
very strongly; some plants, otherwise identical with 
their neighbours, shed their flower-buds just before 
opening them, while their neighbours retain them. The 
first produce a scanty flowering-curve, the others a gigantic 
one. Neither, however, ripen any early bolls, and the 
distinction appears to be due entirely to accidental root- 
differences. 

Another important factor which modifies the form of 
the later part of this curve is the water-table. The 
coincidence in time between the contact of the roots with 
the water, and the rapid cessation of flowering, is shown 
very clearly in records from families sown on different 
dates, the idiosyncrasies of each family being obliterated 
when this contact takes place ; on continued rising of the 
water the flowering curves all coalesce at or near zero. 
The field-crop records taken at Giza show variations in 
this respect as between 1909 when the flood was very 
early, and the two following years when the flood was late 
(Fig. 45). 


These last records are of exceptional interest, as they 


mut DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 65 


demonstrate for the first time the effect of increasing 
the head of water on the Delta Barrage and so immersing 
the lower roots sooner than would normally be the case, in 
the land lying up-stream. 


1909 1910 1911 
1-00 x x x 
4 

= n ee 1977 
a fa 
£ i— ! \ Sinieeecctwe 1910 
a t 
a a 1909 
as & ' 
s ’ way 
3 U Sy 
®0-50 a 
30-40 : ad 
2 A : . \ 
go 30;— - 4 x \ 
3 i *s * 
= 0-20+- f Spe Ny: 

‘ sey 
0-10;- (Tein ate 
A Tae al bee 
June dul Aug September October 


Yy ust 
ll 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 1 8 15 22 29 
Fic. 45.—Meran Fiowerine Curves In Fietp Crop. 


On same land, with same variety, in three successive years, at Giza. 
x = Date on which Roda Gauge reached 16 m. A.S.L. 


Decaudation due to rise of sub-soil water over roots. See Figs. 30, 35, 38, 
and 47. 


The bolling curve.—Curves plotted to show the 
number of bolls opening each day in the same way as for 
the flowering curve, should be identical with them, if all 
the flowers which opened were ripened into bolls. Such 
perfection has never been obtained by any of the author's 
plants. Some of the flowers are always shed, and the 
ratio of bolls formed to flowers opened has never exceeded 
90 per cent., and has been known to fall almost to zero. 
To take an extreme example, a certain plant, otherwise 
quite healthy, in the year 1909, ripened three bolls out of 
a total of 746 flowers which opened before the middle of 
September. 

The early part of the bolling curve, formed by flowers 
which have opened at the beginning of the Critical Period, 
is usually identical with the form of the originating flower- 


ing curve (Fig. 30), but after the first few weeks it 
_ 


66 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


frequently. bears no relation whatever to the latter. Hence, 
the variations in form of the bolling curve have to be 
studied principally in terms of “shedding.” 

In order to ascertain the shedding-curve, unless sufficient 
assistance permits of direct measurement, we have to sub- 
tract the bolling curve from the flowering curve, allowing 
a certain interval for the maturation of the flower into a 
boll. This period is variable, its length being in the first 
instance specific. Thus, quoting again from the same 
three families, at Cairo, King Upland has a mean matura- 
tion period of forty-two days, Egyptian Sultani has a mean 
period of fifty-one days, while the Afifi strain takes forty- 
eight from the day when the flower opens till the day 
when the boll cracks and discloses the contents. The 
figures are determined by labelling single flowers with the 
date on which they open. Apart from these specific 
differences, which are, after all, only the mean expression 
of numerous environmental influences acting on specific 
organisms, we find variations in this period on individual 
plants. Flowers which open on the same day and on the 
same plant may differ by two or three days in their 
maturation-period ; we must be content for the present to 
describe such differences as due to chance. Further, it 
was first pointed out by Allard that in the United States 
the maturation period became longer as the temperature 
fell, so that the late bolls took longer to develop; he 
pointed out, as a curious example of the practician’s 
unreliability in practical matters, that the belief of the 
farmer holds to the exact converse. The maturation 
period is eight days longer in the middle Delta than at 
Cairo. 

Since the mean for the standard Afifi strain at Cairo 
lies at forty-eight days +3 per cent., we shall not intro- 
duce any serious error if we plot the mean shedding curves 
of this strain by subtracting bolling from the flowering of 
seven weeks previously. Such a subtraction-result is not 


ut DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT ~ 67 


precise, but it is very useful in cases where direct 
shedding-records have been impossible. 

The shedding curve.—We have just seen that the 
bolling curve, which represents not only the distribution 
but also the size of the ultimate yield of the plant, and 
hence of the area, is in reality the flowering curve modified 
by shedding. This shedding process thus becomes a 
matter of great economic importance. More than this, 
the shedding of an organ of the plant is a phenomenon of 
great interest from the general scientific viewpoint. The 
fact that removal of a few roots should cause the abscission 
of leaves or flowers, quite automatically, leads directly to 
consideration of the complex interaction of stimuli 
necessary to produce such transmission and conversion of 
cause into effect. 

The term in common use to describe the process under 
discussion is “ boll-shedding.” It is not altogether satis- 
factory, since the organs shed by the plant are chiefly 
flowers shed three or four days after opening, and hence 
only described as bolls by courtesy. Ripening bolls, up to 
two centimetres in diameter, may be shed, but this is less 
common. In addition, there may be extensive shedding 
of unopened flower-buds, and the fall of the leaves belongs 
to the same general category. Consequently, the general 
term “shedding,” while sufficiently descriptive, is more 
truthful. 

The composition of the sheddings actually gathered from 
the ground beneath a field plot of more than a thousand 
plants in 1910, at Giza, is shown in Fig. 46. Shed leaves 
were not counted, but the diagram shows that flower-buds 
may be shed even before the opening of the first flower, 
that the majority of the sheddings are flowers which have 
been cut off before they had definitely “set” their ovaries, 
while the percentage of true bolls of various ages up to 
three weeks old is only noticeable in the autumn. 

The act of shedding is, of course, under the control of 

F 2 


68 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT chap. 


the plant, its immediate cause being the formation of a 
special tissue across the base of the stalk of the leaf, bud, 
or flower. The facultative position of this tissue, or 
“ absciss-layer,” is marked by a slight groove on the stalk. 
When the determining stimulus has been received by the 
cells of this layer, which are otherwise indistinguishable 
from their neighbours, they proceed to divide, and the 
daughter-cells separate from one another, thus destroying 


Field Crop From 1,300 plaats, 
Giza 1910. A collected weekly. 
0-15 Ba 
A 
3 = S 
i~% q 
< 
040 A 
n 
= 
3 
3 
% Fl Ss 
ower: x 
0:05 : 
_/ | 
ie RT i en DO! Bulds| [~~ +~_5 
Week July August September October 
ending 2 6 3 1 


Fic. 46.—Composition oF SHEDDINGS. 


the continuity of the stalk except in such tissues as the 
wood. The phloem being among the severed tissues, 
synthesised food supplies are cut off, the organ dies, sooner 
or later the stalk breaks, and the organ is shed. Even 
before any sign of unhealthiness becomes visible, the stalk 
may break at a light touch, being retained merely by the 
wood-vessels, bast fibres, and cuticle. 

The reaction to the determining stimulus is very rapid 
in cotton, on account of the extreme simplicity of the 
absciss-layer. A convenient way of provoking this 
unknown stimulus is to cut off a few roots. Within four 
days after such treatment, we find that complete severance 
of the tissues of the absciss-layer has taken place. Micro- 


ut DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT _ 69 


scopic examination at intermediate stages shows that the 
plate of dividing cells is only one cell thick, that the 
divisions begin at the periphery, and extend towards the 
centre, and that the dividing wall between the daughter 
cells splits immediately along its middle lamella. The 
daughter cells which are left on the face of the scar, after 
the stalk has broken away, bulge outwards, and form a 
simple callus. 

In many plants this stimulus is also provoked by non- 
pollination, so that unfertilised flowers are shed. This 
occurs in cotton, of course, but it does not seem to be 
common under ordinary conditions. 

For the present we are unable to form any clear 
conception of the chain which extends from the severed 
root to the absciss layer. It is certain that the main 
factor, if not the only one, is the water-content of the 
plant. Mere severance of the root does not provoke 
shedding as a traumatic stimulus ; thus, plants which are 
screened from direct sun after the root has been damaged, 
show little or no shedding. Consequent on such root- 
damage we find a general closure of the stomata, and it 
seems at least probable that this abnormal closure reacts 

-first of all on the absciss layer, by bringing about 
abnormal internal temperatures. Much more experimental 
work is required before further discussion can be 
profitable. 

Though the primary cause of shedding in Egypt is 
a deficient root-absorption, it follows that an excessive 
transpiration rate must produce the same result, since the 
terms “deficient” and “ excessive” are relative. A very 
dry hot day may provoke shedding, but such weather is 
infrequent at the time when shedding is important. The 
heavy shedding of wide-sown plants as compared with that 
of plants in field crop is probably caused by excessive 
transpiration, or rather, by too great irregularity in this 
function, since wide-sown plants are freely exposed to wind, 


70 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


and do not create a humid “surface climate.” In the 
Sudan, however, spells of hot dry wind are generally 
recognised as being the precursors of shedding epidemics. 

Before considering a few typical shedding-curves it may 
be well to insist once more on the economic importance of 
these records. Plants whose flowering curves are identical 
may give entirely different bolling curves ; in other words, 
entirely different crops. 

The record of the behaviour of families sown on various 
dates in the same year may be reconsidered in this 
connection. We have already mentioned a decrease in the 
growth-rate caused in the older families by water-shortage, 
but by the time when boll-shedding is becoming notable, all 
the plants are suffering from root-interference, which in a 
light soil results in periodic water-shortage. As the result. 
of this we find successive modes in the shedding curves, 
common to all the families. Following these modes we 
have periods of less shedding, which immediately follow 
irrigation. Some of these records show three such modes 
in each family, followed by a fourth one. 

This fourth mode is apparently due to a distinct cause. 
Firstly, it comes a week sooner than one would expect ; 
secondly, it is followed by a general cessation of flowering ; 
and lastly, it coincides with the intersection of the 
root-depth line by the level of the infiltrated sub-soil 
water (Fig. 30). 

Thus we have two ways of producing a mode in the 
shedding-curve, relatively to the number of flowers 
available for shedding. One acts through decrease of the 
amount of available water in the soil, while the other way 
is through increase of the soil-water-content to saturation- 
point, thereby excluding air, causing root-asphyxiation, 
and so reducing the size of the root-system; this root- 
system, having been developed to cope with a certain 
mean maximum demand for water from the aérial portions, 
or, more correctly, having controlled the development of 


nr DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 71 


aérial organs of a certain size, is now insufficient to cope 
with the normal water-loss of those organs. They in their 
turn reduce their water-loss to meet the new conditions by 
stomatal closure, but the general metabolic disturbance, 
due to demolition of the delicate balance between root and 
shoot, produces shedding. We have already seen how 
delicate that balance is, when noting that plants would 
grow in sunshine if a few leaves were removed. Here we 
are dealing with the converse. 

Much more experimental work is needed on such points 
as the permissible degree of desiccation or of saturation in 
various types of soil, on the rate of renewal of soil water 
to a root-dried zone, and so forth, but the main principles 
of the matter are now fairly clear. 

In light soil, which has a low power of water retention, 
it would seem from consideration of the shedding curve 
that frequent light waterings are necessary. This practice 
might, on the other hand, be unnecessary, if not injurious, 
in a heavier soil, with a higher capacity for holdmg water. 

A mode in the bolling curve may actually originate 
from a falling flowering curve, if all the flowers had been 
held during one week, so that a heavy crop of bolls is 
picked seven weeks later (Fig. 30). 

Some interesting shedding curves have been obtained 
by the author from land arranged * in three terraces, at 
half-metre differences of level. The purpose of this 
arrangement was to ensure differences in the time and 
intensity of the effect of rising subsoil water; the lowest 
terrace was first affected, the highest last ; the water-table 
in the lowest one almost reached the surface of the soil, 
while in the highest it left a metre of normal soil. 
The method is not ideal, on account of the soil disturb- 
ances entailed, even when the top half-metre of soil is 
carefully replaced on each terrace ; the remainder of the 


* Tn collaboration with Mr. Hughes. 


42 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


plot was not disturbed and always produced superior 
plants during the three years over which the experiment 
lasted, but the three terraces were quite comparable. 
Each terrace carried not less than 300 plants per annum, 
-sown in ten ridges, under conditions which were otherwise 
those of the field crop. The water-table in this site was 
chiefly controlled by changes in the level of the Nile, at a 
distance of nearly a kilometre, though there were variations 
due to impervious patches of soil, even wag bin this small 
area. Es 

In the year 1909 the Nile rose abnormally early; in 
1910 it rose late; 1911 was rather later than 1910. 
The curves of flowering and bolling in 1909 were taken 

om daily observations of three ridges in each plot.* 
They are plotted in Fig. 47, which shows that while 
the flowering curves were identical within the probable 
error on terraces A, B, and C, the later portions of 
the bolling curves were dissimilar, and that this dis- 
similarity was due to the shedding curve. The steady 
progression from terrace C—the lowest—to terrace A, 
becomes still more apparent when the curve of shedding 
is plotted in the form of percentage of flowers shed to 
flowers open. The amount of shedding thus appears to 
be proportional to the depth of root-system which is 
submerged by the rising water-table. In 1910 the same 
set of observations gave no result which could be dis- 
cerned by the methods of observation employed; this 
was not unexpected, since the rise of the Nile shown by 
the water-table on these plots began forty days later than 
in 1909; as also in 1911 (Fig. 45). 

It is noticeable that the 1909 curves show two maxima 
of shedding ; one is coincident with the “critical” period 
of maximum evaporation, the other with root-reduction. 
The first maxtmum was very clearly shown by M. Audebeau, 


* Report 1910 Cotton Commission. 


ut DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 73 


Fen days duly August September October | November Dec. 


‘ending 10 20 30 9 19 29 8 18 28 8 18 28 7 7 27 7 
aN 
0-3k—y 
3s oN 
Q ‘ 
& \ip Flowering 
o 02 _— 
8 i 
“.\. sire. ores 
2 yl a ON ee Fh 
7 al PA Ss 
: lie a 
: 279 Titeeee, 
A 
3 Bek 
50-2 #L—™ 
<i Y/ ae : 
2 i a Bolling . 
2 ‘, aS 
& 0-1 Ne gee —<— 
Spee 
. ii 
3 
a 1 C. 
Q : ri 
OPEN re Shedding 
3 AS ican 
oS ee 
+ 90% 
ae + 80% 
70% 
Leo Percentage of 
BA ao Shedding to Flowers 
C-—— 2 130% 
-+-20% 
A \ eee L 10% 
Soil-surface R.L.-18-8 m. A 
_ ——n 
r= 
ada 
1 Geode 
t- dens, Aug. 1st. 


Fic. 47.—Terracep Lanp. Giza. 1909. 
Three terraces, each 40 em. lower than predecessor. 
Observations on 100 plants in each terrace ; flowers counted every day, bolls 
every tenth day, shedding by subtraction. 


74 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


who cultivated plots of cotton in small cement tanks, with 
the water-table fixed at definite depths in each tank 
throughout the season; his data showed that even the 
absolute shedding, and much more the relative shedding, 
was greatest in soil with a water-table only half a metre 
below the surface, while it became proportionately smaller 
in deeper soils, down to a two-metre water-table. In his 
experiments there was no second mode, since no change 
took place in the water level. We shall appreciate the 
bearing of these data better at a later stage. In general, 
they imply that a sufficiently large volume of soil must be 
occupied by the roots to ensure a uniform water-supply 
for the stem. 

Since the “ terraces” were open to agricultural criticism 
on account of the soil-disturbance involved by their 
construction, a set of six cylindrical iron tanks, each 
80 cm. in diameter, and two metres in height, were sunk 
in a pit in the ground, until their tops were flush with 
the surface, Each was fitted with an inlet pipe at the 
bottom, protected by a loose brick arch, rubble, and sand, 
and was finally filled with good uniform soil. A rubber tube 
leading from this inlet pipe, and connected to an adjustable 
reservoir of water, allowed the level of the water-table in 
each tank to be maintained or adjusted to any required 
level. Various combinations have been employed with 
these tanks, but the results have only substantiated those 
already described. Fixed high water-tables cause undue 
shedding, so that the early part of the bolling curve is 
abnormally small; changing water-tables cause temporary 
shedding, so that a wedge is cut out of the bolling-curve 
about seven weeks after the change has been initiated.” 

Such small tanks are, however, open to many objections, 
and the ideal method of study would be to encase an 
undisturbed mass of soil with armoured concrete by under- 
pinning, so as to convert it into a large tank. A set of at 
east six such tanks should be arranged at intervals in a 


ut DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 75 


large cultivated field, with their rims just buried beneath 
the surface; cultivation could then be normal, and the 
water-level in each tank could be exactiy controlled by 
pumps and tube wells. 

The amount of space which we have devoted to the 
subject of shedding may appear disproportionate, but the 
Egyptian reader will realise its relation to recent problems 
concerning deterioration of yield. 

~ The centre of gravity of the root system.—A 
metaphorical term is often of use in discussion, and the 
words “ centre of gravity” are here used in a metaphorical 
sense. 

The C.G. of the root system may be considered in two: 
respects ; either structurally, or functionally. The structural 
C.G. is first situated in the radicle of the germinating 
seed, from which it moves steadily down the tap-root so 
long as the latter continues to grow. Unequal development 
of laterals would displace the C.G. from the axis of the 
root-system, but we shall assume that root-development is 
perfectly symmetrical in its radial distribution. The 
position of this structural C.G. is the resultant of the 
length of the tap-root with the length, number, and 
position of the lateral roots, A plant growing in shallow 
soil, whose tap-root has consequently been arrested, and 
whose laterals have developed uniformly over all parts of 
the stumpy axis, will thus have a structural C.G. situated 
mid-way between the surface of the soil and the limiting 
lower stratum ; this stratum may be a rock or a water- 
table. If this limiting stratum is removed, the tap-root 
will descend further, and the C.G. will be lowered. 

The mere structural C.G. is of less importance than the 
functional C.G., which must obviously change its position 
from day to day, even when the structural C.G. is 
constant. The magnitude of these changes depends on 
various factors, most of which we have already discussed, 
and although much tedious analysis of soil samples will be 


76 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


required before we can plot a curve to show this diurnal 
change, yet the conception of a variable centre of gravity 
for the water-absorption of the root seems so to clarify our 
ideas on certain points that we will discuss it in more 
detail than it probably deserves. 

As a basis for discussion we may take four series of soil- 
water determinations made at intervals of 20 cm. down- 
wards for a depth of two metres, in the soil occupied by 
the plants on which the daily growth (Fig. 30) was 
measured. The bores were made within a few feet of each 
other, among these plants which—it will be remembered 
—were growing under field-crop conditions. The soil 

contained 25 per cent. of water when completely saturated, 
and the water-determinations, made by drying in the 
steam oven, are expressed in terms of the saturation 
amount. 
‘The determinations were made under the following 
circumstances :— 
June 27th :—Four days after irrigation, when the maximum growth-rate 
of the whole year had just been recorded during the previous twenty-four 
hours. The precedent watering had arrested the symptoms of water- 


shortage yet shown by the plant. We may safely conclude that the 
water-distribution shown on this date was nearly ideal. 


July 11th :—The day before the next subsequent watering, when severe 
water-shortage was being exhibited by all plants, and the growth curve had 
been falling fairly steadily since the last determination. The water- 
distribution here was decidedly typical of insufficiency of water. 


July 15th :—On the third day after watering, when the growth of the 
main axis, having been accelerated for two days, had again begun to 
decrease. The water conditions were probably very good, though no 
growth-measurements were being taken on lateral branches by which this 
statement could be corroborated, but comparison with the growth after the 
previous watering indicates that the water-distribution in the soil had not 
yet reached its optimum. 


July 30th :—These determinations were made just before the next water- 
ing. Water shortage was again apparent, and the period elapsing since the 
last watering was the same as in the case of the determination of July 11th. 


The actual changes in saturation-percentage under these 
various conditions are shown in the following table. The 


1 = DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT 77 


values shown are significant to plus or minus three per 


cent, 
Date. July 27th. July 11th. July 15th. July 80th. 
Depth. Difference. Difference. 
20 cm 43 -18 25 57 —43 14 
40 cm 58 -17 41 73 —54 19 
60 cm 62 -17 45 56 — 22 34 
80 cm 84 - 9 75 77 — 2 75 
100 cm 80 --11 69 82 - 6 76 
120 cm 84 -10 74 86 — 22 64 
140 cm. ......... 90 - 3 87 84 - 3 81 
160 cm. ws... 90 +1 91 87 - 9 78 
180 cm. ......... 86 + 3 89 93 — 6 87 


Firstly, we seem to have found a way of ascertaining 
the depth of the root-system. The depth of the roots 
had been measured by excavation at the end of May, and 
the mean depth for the end of June calculated from this was 
approximately 140 cm. ; this depth was the last at which 
a loss of water was shown. A month later, at the end of 
July, when the roots had grown another 50 cm. at least, 
the samples from 160 cm. and 180 cm. also showed a 
definite loss of water. This is not recommended as a 
trustworthy way of finding mean root-depths, but it at 
least adds an extra method to the scanty stock available 
for root-investigation. 

For further interpretation of these data we obviously 
need to intercalate observations at intermediate dates. 
Certain points may however be deduced from them as 
they stand. Thus, root-growth is not inhibited by soil- 
water amounting to 80-90 per cent. of saturation. Again, 
it would seem that less than 50 per cent. of saturation in 
the soil is sufficient to produce water-shortage; on the 
other hand, the pot experiments on this subject have 
indicated that a lower value, perhaps 20 per cent., does 
not usually limit growth at night ; the difference must be 
due to the fact that a large plant with a “ limited” root- 


78 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


system, having dried up the soil particles near its root 
hairs, has to wait for the incoming of water from adjacent 
particles as reinforcements, so that the plant is injured 
during the day. The greater severity of the water-strain 
during July, due partly to the higher evaporimeter read- 
ings, and more to the greater leaf-area, is shown by the 
greater water-loss during similar intervals, resulting in 
more severe desiccation of the soil on July 30th as 
compared with July 11th. 

The water-loss is more severe in the upper layers of 
soil, partly on account of surface evaporation, but more 
from the complete occupation of such soil by the lateral 
roots. Theextent of this desiccation becomes more severe 
as the plant becomes larger, and it extends to a greater 
depth in the same time. In other words, the centre of 
gravity of the absorbing root-system shifts downwards 
as the root grows larger, along with the structural C.G. 
Moreover, even on the narrowest assumption, the top 40 
em. of soil could have been providing little or no water to 
the roots it contained on July 30th, whereas it had been 
making free provision on July 15th. Thus, on July 15th 
the functional C.G. and the structural C.G. probably 
coincided, whereas on July 30th the functional C.G. has 
descended far below the structural. 

The extent of this displacement obviously increases as 
the root grows larger, and as root-interference between 
adjacent plants extends to greater depths. Thus, in the 
germinating seed there can be no displacement ; structure 
and function have a common centre of gravity. In seed- 
lings with a ten-centimetre root there is a slight change 
as the surface soil dries up after watering, but the dis- 
placement is slight. So, as we progress to older and 
older plants, the amplitude of the displacement increases, 
its duration being bounded by successive waterings, till we 
reach a maximum amplitude probably in early August. 

Using a different method of expression, we may state 


ur DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT ~ 79 


that the plant becomes more and more dependent, for 
longer and longer periods, upon deeper and deeper layers 
of soil for its steady water-supply. 

If now we decrease the depth of available soil by rais- 
ing the water-table, and at the same time asphyxiate, or 
ultimately kill, the lower part of the root-system, we are 
throwing more strain on the surface roots, and reducing 
the deep-seated reserve. If this reduction is effected 
in July or August, when the amplitude of displacement 
of the functional C.G. is at its maximum, the effects— 
shedding, for instance—will be much more severe than if 
the reduction is effected at a later date, when the leaf- 
surface has increased but little more, when the surface 
climate is damper, and the sun-temperature is lower ; all 
these alterations tend to relieve the water-strain on the 
roots, by reducing the evaporation from the stem. 

In this interpretation we find a reasonable explanation 
for the otherwise disproportionate severity of the effects 
produced by an early Nile flood, shown in the shedding- 
curve and flowering-curve on the terraces in 1909, and— 
according to the author's interpretation and forecast‘ ™ ” 
—by the whole of Egypt in the same year, with disastrous 
results. 

Root regeneration.—The appearance of a root-system 
in December is most remarkable, if it has been partially 
immersed in the sub-soil water. The fullest examination 
which the author has made was effected on the Gezira at 
Cairo, where the sub-soil water-level is controlled entirely 
by the river. By excavating a trench of three metres’ 
depth near the side of the plants, washing away the soil 
with a jet of water from a force-pump, and using the 
Ancient Egyptian method of reflecting mirrors to illuminate 
the deeper portions, it was shown that the tap-roots had 
descended to a depth of not less than 220 cm. Below the 
depth of 160 to 170 cm., however, all the original tap-roots 
and their branches were dead (Figs. 35, with 37 and 38). 


80 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cu. 111 


This level coincided with the maximum height of the water- 
table, which had been maintained for ten days at the end 
of September, and again for a day or two about October 
20th. Side by side with these brown and partly decom- 
posed roots, which had been traced unbroken from the 
surface of the ground, there were clean, white, new roots 
in abundance, which terminated at various depths up to 
210 em. On following these new roots upwards they 
were found to arise from those laterals which had not 
been reached by the water-table. When the fall of the 
water-table began at the end of October, these healthy 
laterals had broken out into hundreds of tertiaries of all 
sizes (Figs. 35, 38), which all turned downwards, following 
the flight of the water-table, and reconquered the invaded 
territory. The effect of this reconquest is shown above 
ground by renewed growth of the stems in November 
on a falling temperature-curve. 


CHAPTER IV 
THE COTTON FIBRE 


WHEN the ‘sunshine effect” was first announced, a some- 
what smiling denial came from many cotton experts. 
When some of them had been converted to a belief in the 
fact, they objected that it could not apply to the growth 
of the lint. Substituting “may” for “could” this 
criticism is still valid ; yet if the reader has succeeded in 
gathering some conception of the fate of cotton plants 
under Egyptian field conditions, he will probably expect 
this criticism to yield before further experimental work. 
We are, in point of fact, profoundly ignorant as to the 
bearing of the two preceding chapters upon the final 
commercial result, owing in the main to difficulties in the 
technique of investigation. Methods for determining the 
strength of small samples of fibre, for instance, are non- 
existent ; true, it is possible to determine breaking-strains, 
but the labour involved is enormous * if sufficient results 
are to be obtained to give a reasonable probable error for 
only a single seed. When uot merely a single seed, but a 
thousand, have to be examined, the method becomes 
hopeless. The author is experimenting with indirect 
methods such as determinations of weight, specific gravity, 
etc., which can be made on single fibres by suitable 
appliances, but as yet we are dependent on the rule of 


* Vide e.g. Yves Henry. 
81 


82 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


thumb, and finger, of the expert, who objects to handling 
even single-plant samples. Probably a combination of all 
these methods with a minimum of microscopic observation, 
which is undesirable on account of its high subjective 
error, will give us a line of attack, and we may be able in 
the future to explain why a fibre has become strong or 
weak, and how such weakness or strength is affected by 
the environment. 

Even such an obvious character as length of fibre is 
very difficult to examine during development. The tangle 
of lint hairs on the seed is almost inextricable, especially 
in the early stages, when the individual fibres are too 
weak to endure combing. Further, as in the excavation of 
roots, a fruit once dissected for examination can be no 
longer observed, and averages must be struck. 

The little which we know may be summarised under 
the microscopical evidence, with the evidence derived from 
fluctuation and correlation. 

Cytology of the fibre.—The development of the 
fibre begins before fertilisation is accomplished, by radial 
growth (Figs. 3, 5) of a large number of the epidermal cells 
of the seed coat. These cells (Fig. 4) differ in no respect 
from their neighbours, and it seems possible that the 
density of the coating may be determined by the external 
conditions during a day or two after flowering. Possibly 
irregularity in length may arise from distribution of the 
normal simultaneous “ sprouting” of these cells over 
several days. ‘ 

The young fibre (Figs. 6, 7) at once assumes its final 
diameter, which is about twice that of the unaltered cell. 
It remains unicellular throughout its career, and is always 
covered by the cuticle which protected the original cell. 
The familiar “beading” which follows treatment with 
ammoniacal copper hydroxide is simply due to constriction 
of the swelling cellulose by the cuticular remains. For 
the first day the nucleus lies at the tip of the swelling, but 


IV THE COTTON FIBRE 83 


after the third day it takes its place in the middle of the 
cell axis, and there remains, either slung in cytoplasmic 
bridles, or at the side. The cytoplasm, of course, 
lines the whole cell-wall, and appears ie remain, alive 
until the boll cracks. 

The growth of the fibre is at first confined to. ae 
extension. In fact, it seems that the boll attains.almost 
to its full size before any secondary thickening of the 
fibre wall begins. By this time the fibre has reached 
to rather more than its final ripe length. This:,period 
embraces about half the total maturation period, being 
some twenty-five days. Presumably it is during this 
period that unfavourable environment, such as is made 
manifest by a mode in the Shedding Curve, could produce 
irregularity in length from boll to boll. The final length 
is of course constitutional, and can only be deflected from 
this constitutional basis to a relatively slight extent. 
Even seeds which have not been fertilised, and consist of 
empty, undeveloped seed-coats alone, possess hairs of 
nearly normal length, though abnormally weak. The 
best evidence in respect of this constitutional basis for 
length is given by measurements on the ripe seed. Thus, 
a random selection of data for maximum lint-lengths, 
in five seeds per plant in a pure strain grown under 
conditions favouring maximum fluctuation, has given the 
following figures on a total of 210 seeds. 


Mean length vee eee tee ee eee = 83°50 mm. 


Extremes... see aes ee eee, 27 and 39 mm. 
Standard deviation vin ate ace oe, © 24am, 
Probable error... «5 see vee wee): 1°44 mm. 


Probable error as percentage of mean = +£4°3 per cent. 


Comparison of one strain with another in this way 
shows that the mean lint-length is an inherited character- 
‘istic. The final attainment of the lint cell in the matter 
of length is effected by intercalary growth, the form of 
the tip and of the base being determined at an early stage. 

G 2 


84 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


The cessation of this growth is thus the result of 
internal constitution, though environmental changes 
exercise a limited effect. (Fig. 50 also, “310” and 
i ae | 

It appears, though this point is not quite clear as yet, 
that linear extension has ceased before thickening of the 
wall commences. It is this thickening which determines 
the strength of the individual fibre. The strength of the 
commercial sample depends not only on thickness, but also 
on uniformity of strength as between different fibres. 
Moreover, commercial strength does not merely result 
from the thickness of the cell-wall, but also from the 
uniformity of that thickness over the whole length of 
the cell, and possibly is also affected by the ‘“ texture” 
of the thickening layers. 

Even as regards the simple fact of thickening, we find 
many curious delusions in the extant literature of the 
subject. Confining ourselves to the known data, the 
matter is a simple one; concentric Jayers of cellulose, 
probably delimited from night to night, are laid down on 
the interior of the delicate cellulose-cuticle wall, until a 
certain thickness is reached. This deposition is not uniform, 
but results in the formation of simple pits at intervals, 
elongated obliquely. 

In consequence of this pitting we find that fibres devoid 
of secondary thickening show no twisting when extricated 
from the unripe boll and dried, while fibres taken from a 
boll which is nearly ripe exhibit rapid and uniform 
twisting as they dry, owing to the closure of the solid 
portions of the cell-wall into the minute spaces formerly 
occupied by the pits. 

Strength.—In respect of the strength of the lint, we 
have some evidence to show that the causes which provoke 
shedding are simultaneously effective in weakening the 
lint. 

The lint from the terraces (Fig. 47) in 1909 was 


IV THE COTTON FIBRE 85 


submitted to an expert * for grading. The first pickings 
from all were classified as uniform. The second pickings, 
ripened during the rise of the water-table, were progres- 
sively graded ; the top terrace gave the strongest lint, and 
each step down was a stage weaker. These second pickings 
came from the bolls which had ripened during the rise 
of the water-table. 

Another set of data came from an F, of Egyptian x 
American. The lints were classified by the grader into 
groups, according to their strength. The amount of 
shedding per plant in this family had been computed 
up to a certain date and found to range from 100 per 
cent. to 19 per cent. of the flowers opened, with a mean 
at 70 per cent. Grouping those plants which possessed 
Egyptian lint according to their strength, the following 
figures were obtained : 


Strength. Mean Shedding. 
Weak ase ade. aie aan Wee 70°2 per cent, 
Medium... ... ... 0. oe 68°7 34 
DtEONE a3. aa A Se ee 60°6 55 


In this case the cause of variation in shedding is 
constitutional, and the correlation is hence more striking 
than when the variations were due to environment only. 

This same family was dissected in the same manner for 
other characters, but no other correlations were obtained, 
except with regard to lint-weight (mean weight of lint per 
seed), This ranged from 0021 g. to 0°060 g. with the 
mean at 0°036 g. Classifying the Egyptians again by 
strength we found :— 


Strength. Mean Lint weight. 
Weak = sas ive was ewe ea, ans 0:0348 g. 
Medititi- ys wie ee aes hae aed 0-0358 
Stromg ae se) Gen ake Sag SE 0:0373 


Thus the heavier lint is the stronger. Further, since 
lint-weight and seed-weight are closely correlated, we find 


* Mv. H. C. Thomas, of the National Bank of Egypt. 


86 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


that the “ ginning out-turn” is highest in the strong lints. 
This ranged from 48 to 111; mean at 75 about. 


Strength. Mean Out-turn. 
Wreale ico skie Guxt cha, Shan 20m Gai 69-90 
Medium -vsx. ase agar) age eee 72°96 
Strong as. wz. ove we ces ts SOT 


The last result gives a partial clue to the preference for 
high “ out-turn” which the buyer—independently of the 
grower—displays. A few notes on this matter should be 
made. 

Ginning out-turn.—The out-turn of lint from seed 
cotton at the gin is expressed in Egypt as rotls of lint per 
315 rotls of seed-cotton. The extreme means recorded 
for a whole factory throughout a season are 113°3 (Abbassi, 
Qalioubia, 1899) and 88-0 (Ashmouni, Sharkia, 1888). 
Variations in this figure occur from place to place, but 
when the mean out-turns of large ginning factories are 
considered, we find ‘that the variation-graphs for a number 
of years are closely similar in different places.” Thus 1903 
showed a sudden rise of out-turn almost everywhere in 
Egypt. 

These variations are as yet inexplicable. Wide-sown 
plants give much lower out-turns than those which are sown 
in field crop,* and nitrogenous manures in field crop also 
depress the out-turn, through increase in the seed-weight.t 
The variation is due, of course, to imperfect correlation of 
lint-weight with seed-weight.” This correlation had a 
value of r= 0°810-+0°035 in a set of forty-five commercial 
samples of one variety examined by the author. It has 
been shown by Mr. J. I. Craig { that there has been also a 
slight correlation between mean out-turn and the total 
Egyptian crop in any given year; r=0°3899+40°182 for 
fourteen years. 

The study of variations in ginning out-turn is thus 
dissected into separate studies of fluctuation in lint-weight 
and in seed- weight. 

* E.g. Vig. 50. ‘* Varieties.” -. + Hughes, 3. . t Craig, 3. 


IV ‘THE COTTON FIBRE 87 


Lint length.—The “length” of the lint is also a 
complex of several factors. Chief amongst these are the 
mean maximum length, and the regularity. 

Some strains of cotton produce lint-hairs of the same 
length on all parts of the seed-coat.” Most kinds, however, 
make shorter hairs, at the micropylar end.*° Fluctuation 
in this respect. does not seem to be very noticeable, and 
we can restrict our present remarks to the mean maximum 
length; this is ascertained by combing the lint on the 
seed, and measuring from the seed to the edge of its 
halo of lint. 

Fluctuation in the mean maximum length is described 
later, and the relation of such fluctuation to the conditions 
under which the fibre develops has already been discussed. 
Briefly summarised, this length is determined primarily by 
the constitution of the individual plant ; secondarily, by the 
experiences of the particular seed and boll during the first 
four weeks after flowering. 

The’ second determinant necessarily varies greatly when 
we are dealing with.a commercial sample which includes 
seed from bolls of various ages; the particular experiences 
of each boll may be so different that on the average we 
may consider the effects from year to year.as being almost 
uniform. Consequently, though it is possible to-depress a 
40 mm. lint to 30 mm., we find that the practician draws 
a sharp: distinction between 30 mm. and 40 mm. 
varieties. 


We have now ‘completed: an..outline sketch of the 
principal factors which’ are yet known to control the 
development of a cotton’ plant in Egypt, and certain 
hypotheses have been: propounded which serve for the 
present as interpreters of the author’s data. 

“It might seem that too much stress, has been. laid, 


* Photos. 


88 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cu. Iv 


whenever and wherever possible, on physico-chemical 
possibilities. The author’s own opinion favours such 
readings of the experimental text, if only as a refuge from 
disguised vitalism. Lest such opinion be made an 
accusation, it may be well’ to point out that many 
recorded phenomena will not yet yield to the point of 
such hypotheses. One irreconcilable of this order is the 
striking ‘‘ sleep-movement,” which is exhibited by all 
leaves throughout the year, and even by the seed-leaves. 

The organic factors of the environment, such as fungoid 
and insect pests, together with the flora and fauna of the 
soil, cannot be discussed within these limits. The fungi, 
excepting ‘“Sore-shin,’ are of negligible importance in 
Egypt, though Colletotrichium gossypii, Mycospherella 
gossypina, and Meliola spp. are extremely common. The 
insects, conversely, are of great economic importance, 
though the blame for many of their reputed crimes really 
lies at the feet of the plant, particularly in respect to the 
boll-worm. Some such confusions have already been 
noted in passing, and it is curious to note that a mild 
attack of cotton-worm, through diminishing the water- 
strain, may actually increase the yield by prolonging the 
flowering-period. 

The soil flora, imperfectly understood, must be left 
untouched by us. In soils of the Nile Valley the 
geological aspect is superior to the chemical one; texture, 
and hence water-content (frequently complicated by 
“ salting”) is more important than manurial mixtures. 
The author's colleague, Mr. F. Hughes, has shown con- 
clusively that the cotton-crop of latter-day Egypt is rarely 
limited—in Blackman’s sense—by the chemical com- 
position of the soil. Water, always sufficient, but never 
excessive, is the principal need of the crop;” and the 
desired balance between deficit and surplus is struck only 
by accident as yet. 


SECTION III 


THE RACE 


At intervals throughout the preceding pages we have had 
to resort to evidence drawn from the average behaviour of 
groups of plants, in default of precise data from in- 
dividuals. In other words, we have considered a group as 
representing an average individual. These groups have 
now to be considered for their intrinsic interest. 

Such groups may be derived from a “ pure strain,” 
being all of identical gametic composition ; in this case we 
find material to study in the fluctuation, which is the 
result of slight irregularities in a normally uniform 
environment. Again, the groups may be derived from 
the crossing of two pure strains, in which case their 
gametic composition may not be uniform; we have then 
to apply corrections for fluctuation, and having done this 
we search in the residuum for evidence of gametic 
differences wherewith to formulate expressions for the 
inheritance of each characteristic. 

Lastly—though it will be more convenient to discuss 
this subject in the second place—the group may consist of 
many different pure strains, mingled with hybrids between 
them of every generation imaginable. Such is the com- 
position of the commercial “varieties.” Within limits, 


and for certain purposes, we may consider such varieties 
. if 


go THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT 


as uniform, since the inequalities smooth themselves out 
when a sufficiently large number of plants is taken. 

These group limits have been drawn for convenience, and 
they are perfectly genuine. Nevertheless, the phenomena 
are mutually interdependent, so that the humblest plot 
of cotton cannot be understood without a knowledge of 
Physiology and of Genetics. The subject of Fluctuation 
forms a neutral ground between these two relative branches 
of science; it belongs to both; physiology explains it, 
genetics cannot be explained without it. 

The author frequently had oceasion to regret the lack 
of significance in his older heredity experiments, due to 
lack of fluctuation data as standards, and when these 
began to accumulate they were found meaningless until 
the physiology had been studied. 


CHAPTER V 
FLUCTUATION 


WHEN we desire to compare different sets of data, we 
must either admit of no observational error, or ascertain 
separately what error exists in each set, or else employ 
standard methods of known probable error.. The last is 
the most convenient method, since the yearly programme 
of work can be standardised, and comparisons are easily 
effected. The particular method employed for any one 
characteristic, such as the form of the leaf, is a compromise 
between the probable error and the. facilities for 
observation. 

The slide rule and nomographs, measuring dividers, 
glass plates graduated in angles and lengths, the plani- 
meter and pantograph, adding machine and Joly balance, 
with a string of simpler appliances stretching down to the 
oldest of all—a small-tooth comb—have been successfully 
pressed into service with the object of economising time 
in these researches. 

The pure strains on which these observations have been 
made were derived from single plants of. various kinds. 
A few of the offspring in every year during periods of 
three to six years have been covered with mosquito netting” 
to prevent natural crossing ; the resulting strains are not 
visibly impure, so far as our present knowledge can 
ascertain. 

gt 


92 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


Whenever a family is henceforth mentioned, it should 
be understood to be one of these strains. Commercial 
“‘ varieties ” will be specifically designated as such. 

Since the fluctuation-graphs for parents will necessarily 
be consulted when dealing later with genetics proper, the 
reader is referred to these, except where some special 
point requires to be illustrated by a special figure. 

For the expression of fluctuation in statistical terms, we 
shall take the percentage probable error, and not the 
“coefficient of variation.” The latter is the “standard 
deviation” expressed in percentage of the mean. The former 


— 
is roughly two-thirds of the latter, 2.e., PE = 0-67,/ 28 


P, 100. 

Mean ~ 
convenient, since half the observed cases must lie within 
the limits given. The maximum possible true fluctuation 
may be taken as odds of about 30:1, or 3°2 times the 
probable error. 

Whenever a specific figure is given for a family it 
should be understood as having been checked by com- 
parison with other families, and therefore considered by 
the author as being fairly representative of the data 
available. 

Colour characters.—Such characters as the colour of 
the petal anthers are devoid of appreciable fluctuation. 
This uniformity is probably apparent rather than real, 
since a difference of less than 10 per cent. in the 
intensity of a colour cannot be perceived by the ordinary 
eye. 

When colours have to be classified, as in hybrid popula- 
tions, standard flowers, &c. are always used, and the 
unknowns are matched to them. 

Characters which depend on the presence of antho- 
cyanin in the tissues, such as the red spot at the junction of 
petiole with lamina, fluctuate widely. Comparisons can 


and our particular expression is This form is 


v FLUCTUATION 93 


only be made with safety when the plants are equally 
healthy. 

The stem.—The branching habit of the stem has not 
received from the author the attention it merits. Some 
evidence may be gleaned indirectly from the flowering- 
curves, but systematic study of fluctuation in branching 
is difficult,* unless a high subjective error is risked. 

The height of the central axis is easily examined. The 
plants are measured to the nearest 5 cm. every week or 
fortnight, taking the soil-surface and the terminal bud as 
the approximate extremes. A portion of the fullest series 
of height determinations obtained as yet is plotted in 
Fig. 48. This series represents an extreme case, some 
plants being badly stunted. The height determinations 
in this family can be compared with similar series from a 
very uniform lot of seedlings belonging to family “307,” 
and also with rows of commercial Afifi plants in field crop. 
These last were measured to bench-marks with a water- 
level. The statistical statement is as follows : 


July 4th. August 29th. 
x Number 
Family. of Plants. 


Mean. PY EB. Mean. PLE. 


Per cent. Per cent. 


307. Wide-sown, uniform 17 524 cm. | £12°0 || 115 cm.) + 9-2 


77. $8 irregular 45 61 cm.| £18°3 || 114 cm.) +12:°0 
Commercial Field - crop ; 
fairly uniform... ... 98 524 cm.| £152 || 89cm.) £15°4 


The fluctuation in a wide-sown pure strain decreases as 
the plants grow older, stunts overtaking the normals. 
This is partly the case in field sowing, though to a less 
extent owing to competition, and it is further masked in 
commercial varieties by their non-uniform composition. 


* See, however, Leake, H.M., 2 and 3. 


94 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


The same figure (Fig. 48) also shows the fluctuation in 
the growth curve, which can be obtained by following the 
same plant from date to date. 


27 is May 23. 


26 
27 18 25 

21 24 15 16 _dune 5, 

1413 7 3°17 

8.114 2°10 5 


16 
27 «22 12 June. 19. 
24 20 6 
21:23 13 15 26; 5 vw 
19. 8 14:11 7 4/3]2 10 
: 
July 4. 27 6 
2414 26 22 25 4 
19 23 12 205 8 
a 27 17 § 12 13:16 2 
\ 
27 
July 78, 23 21 
26 22 16 12/18 
8 13:15 7\7 10 
24419 411 14 20 251315 2 6 
27 
Aug. 1. 25 
23) 14 18 
26 22 16)/21 u ie ae 
24 19_ 20 13/4 8 15 3 5 12 2 10 
Aug.) |76. i 
26 2325 § 2711 1712 
24 22 19/16/20 13 2115 4 14 8 3 7/1016 2 
Aug. 29. ‘ 
24 1 10 
—__2219|90/16 9513 4 5 18 3|1|12 7 8 6 2 
Ped 
|Sept. 12. it 
14 
28 24 21 ta} fiz 10 
22 |ielig 251533 934] 3/5 11 8 27 8 
Sept. 26. 27 
Pp # 
26 24 14.11 ~ 10 
22 he] 19 2545 13 2123 18/3/12 4 5 8 2 6 7 


10 20 380 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 NO 120 180 140 150 160 170 180 190 
Centimetres 


Fic. 48.—Heient or Stem. 
Wide-sown, pure strain ‘‘ 77.” 
This figure is a reproduction of a page in the ‘* Ledger” of this strain. 


The correlation of fluctuations in height with the fluctua- 
tions of other characters has occasionally been interesting. 
The most curious result was obtained in this same family 
77, with respect to the leaf-length. The latter was 
measured in the first week of September ; plotted against 


v FLUCTUATION oe 95 


height on July 4th, two months previously, there was a 
marked negative correlation; r= —0°67, on 81 pairs; 
plants which had been short in July possessed long leaves 
in September. The height on September 12th—at the 
time. of leaf measurement—showed a small positive 
correlation, while August Ist gave a transition stage 
with no correlation at all. These data have obviously 
some bearing on the inter-play of root upon shoot, and 
conversely, 

The correlation of height on July 4th with the data of 
the first flower—which varied in one series from June 19th 
to July 28—is definitely curvilinear. Plants which. were 
stunted, and are therefore still short, flower proportionately 
late, but this correlation vanishes after passing the mean 
height, all the normal and super-normal plants flowering 
at approximately the same time. Here we are probably 
dealing with the data of initiation of the flowering-branch 
buds. 

The correlation of early height with total flower- or boll- 
production is also close, and becomes less distinct. as we 
pass to later height. This is effectively a statement that 
stunted plants, even if they grow up later to normal 
height, cannot produce a crop of normal size. This effect 
of stunting acts partly through the delayed first-flower. 

The leaf.—Fluctuation in absolute size of the leaf, as 
expressed by measuring the length of the mid-rib, is 
obviously complex. The correlation with stem-height, 
previously mentioned, will serve to illustrate this. Still, even 
leaf-length is tolerably definite, the PH. ranging from 6 per 
cent. to 34 per cent. The discussion of leaf-form, however, 
introduces us to a new set of factors, of ontogenetic, or 
even phylogenetic nature. The first leaf of the seedling 
plant is entire, even when adult; later leaves became 
progressively more elaborate even when first unfolded, 
until the five segmented typical leaf is reached. The 
form assumed is nevertheless not independent of the 


96 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


environment, for later buds on old stems may develop 
leaves of juvenile form. 

As regards the method of observation, we take three 
adult leaves from every plant during August-September. 
Each one is laid under a graduated glass plate, from which 
its length, and two angles, are read. From these we can 
complete any other constituents of the triangle thus 
recorded. This triangle gives us the form of the central 
segment, which is limited lengthways by the petiole and 
the central tip, and laterally by the sinus at which the 
leaf-margin bends sharply back on the lateral seg- 
ment, 

The position of this sinus is the essential feature. On 
examining growing leaves we find that the sinus moves 
outwards along a constant angle as the leaf enlarges, at a 
rate which is directly proportional to the growth of the 
leaf in length, consequently the sinus-angle relatively to the 
mid-rib, either from tip (4*)or origin (4°) shows the 
minimum fluctuation. More fluctuation is necessarily 
shown by the length of the line from petiole to sinus pro- 
portionately with the total length, but both are specific. 
If we neglect such additional factors as curvature of the 
segment-margin, plication of the lamina, &c., this method 
of expression is comprehensive. A check on the result is 
obtained by plotting sinus-positions in a pure strain, 
relatively to the tip or to the base. The resulting diagram 
resembles the side view of a choked shot-gun discharge, 
passing along the angle-lines, the centre of the pellets 
defining the mean sinus-length. The P.£. of these angles 
in Egyptian strains is about +3°0 per cent. 

The number of leaf-segments, or rather the development 
of the second pair of lateral segments, has been mentioned 
above as dependent on ontogeny. It is fairly definite 
under given conditions, same strains refusing to produce 
the extra pair. 

Perhaps it is worth while to mention that such presum- 


v FLUCTUATION 97 


ably primitive cottons as G. Sturtiz, F.V.M.,* retain the 
entire leaf throughout their development. 

The depth of the segmentation, when present, varies 
within the same sub-species, as in the two forms of 
“Nyam-nyam kidney cotton;” possibly the Okra-leaf 
sport in American Uplands is another example. Such 
facts are suggestive of mutation, but mutations in 
Gossypium ought not to be mentioned until we know 
much more about natural crossing and heredity than we 
are likely to acquire for several years to come. 

The flower.—lIn the course of an attempt to breed 
an uncrossable flower, to be mentioned again later, the 
author had had occasion to measure the various floral 
organs, namely, petal, style, staminal column, and fila- 
ments. The sequence of development of these in the bud 
begins with the petal, followed by the column and fila- 
ments, and ends with the style. 

The fluctuation does not follow this order. Fifty-one 
plants in “77” family gave the following typical 
results :— a 


Petal, ase sais ape Mean, 59 mm. P. HE. +2°8 per cent. 
Style acs wus xcs BD ngs P.E. 435 $9 
Column ... «0... se. Anas P.#H. +56 ‘is 
Filament Sears is 4°2 mm. PLE. £77 


” 


A portion of this increased fluctuation is probably 
apparent, being due to greater errors of measurement in 
the smaller organs, but much of the increase is certainly 
significant. One would rather expect the external organs 
to fluctuate most, but the reverse is the case. 

The involucral bracts are intermediate in their fluctua- 
tion. ‘Their width in the same family gave a P.E. of 
+ 4:0 percent. The ratio of width to length also gives 
a 4°0 per cent. probable error. 

The measurements are taken with dividing compasses 


* Watt, Sir G. 
H 


98 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


to the nearest millimetre exept in the filaments, where 
half-millimetres are attempted. Three flowers are 


examined on every plant, and the means for all three are 
taken. 

First flower and maturation.—The obvious effect 
of early stunting is to provide a long tail of late-flowering 
plants upon a graph which shows the date of the first 
flower. If the originally stunted plants are excluded, the 
P.E. of this date works out at a little more than four 
days in most families, or 33 per cent. of the time elapsing 
between sowing and flowering. 

The maturation of the flowers opening during early 
July at Cairo has been directly recorded by marking the 
flowers. The results for, e.g., family “77” in 1911 gave a 
mean of forty-eight days with a P.H#. of + 3:0 per cent. 
The period is longer in the Delta. 

Flowering and bolling.—The limits of the present 
volume do not permit of detailed discussion of the 
fluctuation from plant to plant in flowering- and bolling- 
curves, beyond the account of the possible controlling 
factors already given. 

The influence of sowing-distance is shown in Fig. 44, 
four times the number of flowers being found on wide- 
sown plants as against field sowing. The point is important 
with regard to propagation of new varieties ;* by wide- 
sowing we can obtain 100 bolls per plant from a strain 
which will only produce 15 to 20 in field crop. 

The influence of defoliation by cotton-worm is peculiar, 
the flowering being immediately arrested, but subsequently 
extended much later than usual, so that a warm autumn 
may enable the ultimate yield to reach the normal. 

A few points of interest arise with regard to the total 
production of flowers up to a certain date, and the bolls 
developed from them. The correlation between these two 
quantities was worked out in the wide-sown, very irregular 
family of “77,” for 1910, with the following results. 


v FLUCTUATION 99 


E, £29 per cent. 

E, £34 
Correlation between total flowers and bolls : r=0°85. 

(Imperfection of correlation is mainly due to shedding.) 


Percentage of retained flowers: Mean, 40°6 ; P. #. +7°5 per cent. 


Total number of flowers per plant Mean, 115 =P. 
50 P. 


” ” bolls ” ” ” ” 


These figures demonstrate the manner in which errors 
accumulate during field experiments. Comparison of two 
rows or plots of the same variety becomes more and more 
erroneous as the plants grow older; comparison by the 
number of flowers has a lower P.#. than comparison by 
the number of bolls; this in its turn has a lower P.E. 
than comparison by weight of seed-cotton picked ; this 
again is more precise than comparison by ginned lint. 
Fresh sources of error creep in at every stage, and the fact 
that field plots have a P.E. of +6 per cent., at least, 
becomes quite comprehensible. 

The boll.—The three chief characteristics of the boll 
are its diameter, the number of loculi, andthe shape. The 
first. and last are determined from three full-grown 
bolls per plant, measured with parallel-jaw callipers, the 
form being expressed as a diameter in percentage of length. 
The number of loculi is determined by examination of not 
Jess than twenty bolls of one kind on each plant; thus 
forty bolls may have to be examined to obtain the critical 
number, if half are trilocular and half quadrilocular ; 
such a plant receives the designating formula of 3°5. 
Plants whose bolls are all trilocular are designated 3:0; if 
all quadrilocular, 4:0, &c. For certain families the critical 
number has been raised to forty bolls of a kind (eg., 
Fig. 63). 

Specimen data for these characters in Egyptian families 
are :— 


Boll width ... .. 0 « Mean, 25 mm. P. #. +3°6 per cent. 
x AOL: ees: gine wae » 646 ,, P, #H, £3°8 fs 
»> Loculi ...  ... ve ‘5 2°81 ,, P. i. +26 33 


The fluctuation of the last character is low, presumably 
because the number of loculi is differentiated at an early 
HQ — 


100 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


stage of bud-development, whereas the diameter of the 
boll is partly dependent on the environment in which it 
exists during the first thirty days after the flower 
opens. 

It may possibly be owing to this division of boll- 
maturation into two periods that we find no correlation of 
seed weight with any of the boll-characters in pure strains, 
though such correlation is very evident in heterogeneous 
F, families. 

Seed weight.—The mean weight of the seed is 
determined by. weighing and counting samples of not less 
than 200 seeds. There is much to be done yet in deter- 
mining the causes of fluctuation, by examining weekly 
pickings. ‘ 

The highly irregular “77” family of 1911 had a mean 
at 0-097 gram, with a P.#. of +8°3 per cent. 

Another family, of twenty-three very uniform plants 
with a mean at 0:095, had almost as much fluctuation, 
viz., P.E. +7°0 per cent. 

The weight of a seed is completely determined by the 
mother plant, and not by the embryo. Thus the weights 
of single seeds of an F, plant show no modality, nor does 
the weight of the embryo. Forty such seeds, weighed 
singly, gave the following fragmentary result. 


Mean seed weight... 0-180 gram P, FE, £5°9 per cent 
» testa ,, ais 0-078 ,, P. EF. £67 33 
>, embryo weight... 07102 ,, P. EB, +53 5 


Embryo weight = 57 per cent. of seed weight. 


The difference between testa and embryo is slight, and 
both are equally important in causing fluctuation in seed- 
weight. 

The causes of this fluctuation are obscure. Correlations 
have been plotted for all recorded characters, but with 
very few results. The values for “7” need not be given 
since a qualitative statement is sufficient for the available 


data. The only connections yet shown are: Leaf length, 


Vv FLUCTUATION IOI 


some, positive; Height, doubtful, positive; Lint-length, 
slight, negative ; Lint-weight, high, positive ; First flower, 
slight, negative. 

None of these are very definite and the explanation lies 
in the fact that while height, leaf-length, and first-flower 
represent the mean result of a long period of environmental 
influence, the fluctuation in weight for any particular seed 
is probably fixed within a period of a few days. 

The same explanation applies to the high P.Z#. of uniform 
families, which is neany equal to that of the most irregular 
families. 

Summarising, we may say that everything points to the 
root as the controller of fluctuation in seed-weight. 

Lint weight and out-turn.—We have already dealt 
with the correlation between weight of lint and seed, in 
discussing ginning out-turns. The correlation is 
less close in pure strains, taken plant by plant (e.9., 
r=0'72) than for the crop-samples there mentioned 
(r=0°81). 

The fluctuation in lint-weight seems to be proportionally 

less than that.in seed-weight, the P.E. being, | é.9., 275 
per cent. as against 83 per cent. respectively 1 in the same 
family. This. statemént probably requires revision for 
field crop conditions, since wide-sown plants give 
abnormally low ginning out-turns ; the crop-samples gave 
a lower correlation between seed-weight and out-turn 
(0°220-0°094) than between lint-weight and out-turn 
(0316 + ‘091).* 
‘The fluctuation in ginning out-turn for family “77” 
had a mean of 92 rotls, with a P.E. of + 3°5 per cent. 
This is probably an excessively high figure, as the plants 
growing in the tanks gave much higher out-turns than the 
rest. 

Seed fuzz.—Although this amount of “fuzz” on 


* See Craig, J. I. (3). 


102 THE COTTON PLANT EN EGYPT cunap. 


the seed scarcely admits of statistical expression, it is 
sufficiently important to merit a comment. The cytology 
of the “fuzz” hairs is as yet unknown. They are 
certainly different from the lint hairs, but the demarcation 
may not be very obvious in abnormal seeds. 

The presumably primitive cottons * possess no lint, but 
abundant “fuzz” covers the seed-coat. Less “ primitive ” 
cottons have both fuzz and lint. In the cultivated 
cottons we find groups with “entire” fuzz like the 
primitive species, others with fuzz restricted to the hilum 
and raphe, and others with no fuzz whatsoever. The 
phylogenetic interest of the character is consequently high, 
especially since some evidence as to its factorial composition 
is available. 

One of the chief features in this connection is the colour. 
Green, brown, and white fuzz are all known in most 
cultivated cottons, though—since the green is unstable— 
green and brown are not easily distinguished. The lint 
colour, on the other hand, ranges through browns and 
creams to white, while even the browns appear to be of 
various origins. There is, however, a green-linted cotton 
known as “Texas Wool” which appears sporadically in 
fields of American Upland, and breeds true to the green 
lint. This stock is of interest because it provides a 
suggestion of possible phylogenetic connection between 
lint and fuzz. 

Apart from colour, however, we find a certain amount 
of fluctuation in the amount of fuzz. Within a pure 
strain this is very slight, but when severe constitutional 
changes are forced upon a semi-fuzzy stock by crossing 
or by a novel environment, the fluctuation may be 
conspicuous. 

Lint-length.—Since data on fluctuation in lint- 
strength are not yet available, we can quote for lint- 


* Watt, Sir G. 


Vv FLUCTUATION 103 


length only of those characteristics which interest the 
consumer of the crop. 


Cultivation 10 Parent Year 
5 = 
Wide-sown Pn ain 77(B)(x) | 1909 
10 77(B)(x)(1) 
5r ee 
Wide sown % LA 4970 
| ite me 
10 
st N/ 
Wide sown f ” 
10 es 77(B)(x)3 
5Fr Le 
Wide sown £7 1 
10 do 
5b 
Wide sown a w 
25- 
36 LN 77(BYX)N1).2. | 29EE 
SL ae a 
10 
5Fr NWN 
Wide sown 


io fx. 77(BUX)(1) 6 
7 
Field a. 57 ie f—-k i \ — ” 
A 


60 seeds 
10 7 N78) 3 
5 ss \ 


Field 6. >|. af] 7 
60 seeds 
10 — : 
5 sre Pos we Me Commercial 
do. do. eee pe [eee Assili 
“ 
10 i, - 
5 eo el OY pie Commercial 
do. do. ape fe Teer’ wo Nees Affi “ 
20 25 30 35 mm. 


Fic. 49.—Maximum Lint-Lencto or SINGLE SEEDS. 


x Mean length of parent plant. 
— Pure strain of Afifi. 
... Commercial ‘‘ varieties.”’ 


‘Field a and 6” were different field plots carrying alternating rows of 
various cottons. 


Fluctuation in this respect has been shown to vary with 
the season and cultivation, with the sowing distance, &c. 


104 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cu. v 


The extent of this fluctuation is determined on the mean 
maximum lint-length of five seeds taken at random from 
the plant, and gives such results asa P.H. of +2°9 per 
cent. on a mean of 33°5 mm. 

Taking single seeds only, we obtain such results as those 
shown in Fig. 49. There is a definite bi-modality in some 
of these graphs; probably further investigation of such 
modes will show us how to persuade a plant into the 
production of abnormally long lint as a normal preduct. 


CHAPTER VI 
COMMERCIAL VARIETIES 


TuE probable origin of the type of cotton plant grown in 
modern Egypt has been discussed in the historical section 
of this volume. Many commercial varieties have been 
developed within this type. Some are extinct, and are 
only known to the author by name; such were Gallini, 
Abyad, Hariri, Bamia, Hamouli, Zafiri, and Ziftawi. 
Others which have been subjected to examination by the 
author, but which have not been able to make good their 
footing in the market, are Brown Yannovitch, Charara, 
Kerki, and Bolanachi. Others again are cultivated to a 
limited extent, such as Sea Island (both old stock and 
imported seed), Sultani, and Voltos. 

The main varieties at present cultivated on a commercially 
important scale are Yannovitch and Sakellaridis in the 
“fine-spinning” group; Abbassi, as the white and 
moderately fine type ; Ashmouni, Nubari,* Afifi and Assili 
in the “ bread and cheese” group. 

Ashmouni is the putative ancestor of all these, by way 
of Afifi. The origin of any one variety is most difficult to 
ascertain, but the majority probably arose as single-plant 
“selections.” In the case of Yannovitch this is definitely 
known. 


* Nubari is not considered as a ‘‘ bread and cheese ’”’ staple at present, but 
its future probably lies that way. The matter is discussed in as yet 
unpublished reports by the author on the Lancashire cotton demand, 


105 


106 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


Lastly we have the weed cotton, so-called ‘ Hindi.” It 
is not a cultivated variety, but sporadic as a weed mixed 
with other varieties. In general appearance it could 
easily be mistaken for American Uplands, but the seed is 
devoid of fuzz. Within the Hindi type there are various 
sub-types ; thus, of some five hundred plants grown from 
Hindi seed of commercial origin, only about a third were 
very hirsute, while others were completely glabrous. 

The seven important varieties mentioned differ in age. 
Ashmouni, or rather the name, dates back to the ’fifties 
of last century. Afifi was introduced commercially about 
1887, Abbassi in 18938, Yannovitch in 1899, Nubari in 
1907, Sakel in 1909, and Assili in 1910. These dates 
are, of course, approximate, being those years in which a 
conspicuous quantity of the lint reached the spinners. 

Now with this multiplicity of varieties it might be 
imagined that their differentiation was easy. Such is by 
no means the case. All the varieties are similar in 
external appearance; even when grown side by side in 
field rows on the same plot, they cannot be distinguished 
with certainty. There may be far more difference between 
individual plants within the same variety than between 
two distinct varieties. 

Certain physiological differences are found, however, but 
they are not very easily expressed in precise terms. 
Thus Ashmouni is the crop of Upper Egypt, Yannovitch 
is concentrated round a centre in the N.E. of the Delta, 
and Afifi gave the best results in the Southern Delta. 
Again, Yannovitch is credited with cropping lightly, 
about 10 per cent. below Afifi or Abbassi, and this opinion 
is supported by the scanty data available. 

One of the cherished fables of the practician teaches 
that heavy crops and fine staple cannot co-exist. The 
inaccuracy of this belief, though long suspected, has only 
recently been proved by the Sakel variety. The bolling 
curves of Afifi, Sakel, Assili, Voltos, and the pure strain 


vI COMMERCIAL VARIETIES 107 


“77” are shown in Fig, 42, determined from weekly 
pickings of five rows apiece, with a P.H. of + 10 per cent. 
for any point in the curves. 

The total yields of these curves work out as follows : 


BOT 5) atten ~ el Yield =25'1 bolls p.p. . £06 


P.E 
Assili 0. 1... » =199 P.E. £0°5 
Sakel v0... a ae P.E. £05 
Voltos... 60 o. sp). Sey “5 P.E, £04 
(ABE sa ake: one » =200? ,, P.E, £1°5) 


Thus the three commercial varieties included in the list 
are practically identical with regard to yield. 

We have already figured the length of the lint of “77” 
under these conditions, and a comparison of this pure 
strain with similar rows of the two varieties Afifi and 
Assili should be of interest, one being old and notably 
irregular, the other new and presumably uncontaminated. 
The data are plotted in Fig. 49. The P.#. of random 
single seeds in respect of mean maximum lint-length being 
+6°3 per cent., we find values of 7°8 per cent. for Assili 
and 7°5 per cent. for Afifi. 

Thus, on the statistical evidence of lint-length, the 
newest “variety” is by no means uniform. This con- 
clusion is abundantly confirmed by other evidence. Thus, 
the Sakel cotton contains at least two entirely distinct 
types of seed fuzz ; the presence of these two types might 
possibly be unimportant, but in all probability it points 
to a heterogeneous origin for the original plant or plants. 
Such heterogeneity might occur even in the offspring of a 
single-plant selection, if the gametes of this plant were 
not uniform; in other words, if the plant was not pure- 
bred. 

Such constitutional irregularity bemg manifest even in 
new varicties (see also Fig. 50), our next step must be to 
examine the cause. So soon as a family becomes 
heterogeneous, so soon does natural selection begin to 
operate. Once natural selection has begun, any sequence 
of alterations is possible. The usual result of such 


108 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


sequences is to stimulate the belief which les dormant in 
the minds of most people—practical and otherwise— 
namely, that all man-made plant varieties suffer from an 
innate perversity, due to their “ un-natural” crigin, which 
causes them to “revert” at the first opportunity, and so 
to revenge themselves on human interference. 

Up to the present point we have considered only the 
zygotic constitution of the “variety,” and have merely 
laid emphasis on the fact that when a “variety” of cotton 
plants is inspected, plant by plant, the component 
individuals are not usually identical; we have seen, in 
addition, that the differences between nominal varieties 
are mean differences, which are negligible in most 
morphological characters, slight in physiological characters, 
aud are definite only in respect to the nature of the 
commercial product—the lint hairs. 

Our analysis has now to be driven much deeper. We 
have to investigate the origin of these zygotes, to ascertain 
whether they are derived from identical gametes or not, 
and to determine what effect their constitution may have 
on succeeding generations. 

Gametic impurity.—In the older writings on plant- 
selection we find continual references to “ transmitting 
power,” coupled with advice to test this power by 
examining offspring. The reasons for this precaution 
are now better understood ; ‘‘ transmitting power” is not 
a mysterious vital function, but can be reduced to 
formulae. The causes of difference in this respect are 
two-fold. 

In the first case, the plant originally selected may have 
been an extreme fluctuation and its offspring will 
therefore regress to the mean. 

In the second case, with which we are now concerned, 
the original plant was heterozygous, derived from a natural 
or artificial hybridisation. Such hybridisation might have 
taken place in the previous year—the plant thus being an 


VI COMMERCIAL VARIETIES 109 


F,—or more probably several years before, in which case 
the plant may be denoted as F,. In this second case we 
are dealing with an entirely different set of phenomena, 
superadded to fluctuation. The segregation of the 
character-bearing factors in sex-cell formation, with their 
reunion into new combinations at fertilisation, produces a 
set of offspring which differ constitutionally amongst them- 
selves. The complexity of these differences will depend 
on the number of characters in which the original plant 
was heterozygous. 

An example of such a plant may be quoted from the 
author’s records. In 1909, while examining an old field- 
book of 1905, a note was found which gave the names of 
plants in flower at a very early date. They were all 
Uplands with one exception. This exception was a group 
of plants grown from a boll of Kerki, called No. 95. The 
few seeds available were taken from the files and sown. in 
1910, since an early-maturing Egyptian stock was much 
needed. Only five plants were raised, of which four were 
slightly stunted, while the best and earliest was found in 
the autumn to bear an inferior and quite distinct type of 
lint. Whether this plant was an F, from 1905, or an F, 
from an earlier cross, our records could not disclose. The 
former is more probable. The remaining four were again 
fertilised naturally, and four families raised in 1911. They 
were fairly early, and—except for a few natural hybrids 
from crossing in 1910—-were uniform in most respects 
excepting height. The original plants had been irregular 
in height, owing to stunting, but the offspring gave the 
following figures for height in October. 


Parent Height. Offspring. No. of Plants. 
2 85 cm. Mean, 117-7cm. P.H. +12:0 per cent. 94 
3 110,, » 1884, PE. +118 ,, 118 
4 145 ,, , 1540, PE +15 ,, 145 
5 80 ,, » 1382, PE+83 ,, 23 


Inspection of the frequency curves showed that No. 95. 
C. 2 was breeding true to shortness, 95. C. 4 probably 


110 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


to tallness, while 95. C. 3 and 5 were throwing out 
shorts. 

The uniformity of the deviation, which does not reflect 
the heterogeneity of 2 and 3, is due to the fact that the 
plants were growing in pairs, and had not been checked 
for stunting. 

Such an experience is the rule rather than the excep- 
tion. Thus, a series of 75 plants of various varieties 
were examined in four characters, and their offspring 
compared with them. The results were as follows : 

a. Offspring like parent in thirty-eight cases; some 
unlike in thirty-seven cases. 

b. Alterations in each character, twenty-five, fifteen, 
sixteen, and fourteen cases respectively. 

ce. Alteration of all four characters took place in two 
cases, of three characters in seven cases, of two in fifteen, 
of only one in thirteen. 

There is no recorded difference between the different 
commercial varieties in this respect. The newest are 
equally heterozygous with the oldest, though with less 
intensity of difference. 

The cause of the impurity—which soon appears even 
when the original strain was pure—is to be found in the 
act of natural cross-fertilisation, or vicinism. 

The effects of this double impurity need scarcely be 
elaborated. It is obvious that such a welter of unequal 
individuals must form an excellent medium in which 
natural selection can work. The transference of a 
“commercially pure” variety to a new district will be 
followed by “ acclimatisation ” ; such acclimatisation will be 
perfectly genuine, but it will not be due to any mysterious 
impress of the environment on the individuals.’» ” 

Again, if such gametic contamination is continuous from 
year to year, and if our variety is not isolated upon 
an island in mid-ocean, we find a steady admixture taking 
place with other varieties. Such obvious contamination 


VI COMMERCIAL VARIETIES II 


as takes place through seed mixture is relatively 
unimportant in comparison with contamination of the 
ovaries by foreign pollen. We have already laid emphasis 
on the external similarity of the different varieties, and its 
bearing now becomes apparent. A field grown under the 
name of Afifi might consist in reality of a mixture of five 
or six varieties with the original stock, together with all 
possible combinations and permutations of their multi- 
farious gametes, but the difference would be almost 


Length of Lint in mm. 


25 : 30 35 25 380 35 2. 3 35 
| DUR a a La TETANY 
50-51, 
“310” “Variety of 1910" 


60-61 


g per 315 


70-71 


80-81 


90-91 


Out-turn on Ginnin 


{,100-101,— 


“Variety of 1909” 


nome 


Two Pure Strains. Two Commercial Varieties. 


Fic. 50.—Tue Impurrtry or CoMMERCIAL VARIETIES. 


Target-diagram plotted from random single-plant samples in 1911. 
Identical treatment, site, cultivation (wide-sown) and methods. 
Compared in respect of only two important commercial characteristics. 
o = Variety-type, under given conditions. 


invisible till the bolls opened. The mere fact that such a 
cotton as Yannovitch was a simple single-plant isolation 
from Afifi demonstrates this statement sufficiently without 
resort to our detailed tables of plant to plant differences 
(e.g., Fig. 50). 

Further, although the author has quoted Egyptian 
illustrations, the same arguments apply to American 
Uplands, to Sea Islands, and to the few Indian cottons 
which he has studied. Mr. H. Martin Leake has 


demonstrated exactly similar heterogeneity in both 


112 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cx.vi 


zygotes and gametes for Indian varieties, but the 
Egyptian examples are perhaps more striking, on account 
of their higher economic value. 

Even in a uniform environment, therefore, a commercial 
variety of cotton must change and may deteriorate. We. 
might almost say that the change must be in the inferior 
direction, since a successful new variety is mostly superior 
to its parent stock, and will regress if contaminated by it. 
A plausible fiction declares that the life of a variety of 
Egyptian cotton is limited to fifteen years. The kernel of 
truth within this dogma should now be apparent to the 
reader, and it should further be self-evident that the life 
of a variety might be prolonged indefinitely by suitable 
precautions. 


CHAPTER VII 
NATURAL CROSSING 


WueEn the author first began his researches it was generally 
assumed that cotton was self-fertilised, and the only 
precise statement to the contrary was that of Webber, 
who had found 5 per cent. natural crossing between 
adjacent rows of distinct varieties. At the present day 
the seriousness of the crossing error has been demonstrated 
and admitted in many countries,* but the importance of 
the subject does not end with this conversion. 

Field conditions.—The author's first concern was to 
investigate the amount of crossing which had taken place 
in field crop during 1904 by examining the offspring from 
random single bolls of that year.** It was found that when 
a plant did not give uniform offspring, resembling itself, 
the difference of the offspring from the parent might be of 
two kinds. 

In one case the offspring, or some of them, bore 
characters which were dominant over those of the parent ; 
thus a 40 mm. lint might be derived from a 25 mm. lint ; 
the presumption here was that all or some of the parent 
ovules had been crossed in the previous year by pollen 
from a long-linted plant. This was the rarer case, which 
“in itself defines the amount of natural crossing, if we take 


* Notably Leake, H. M. (1), (4), and Allard, H. A. 
113 I 


114 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuaap. 


the number of such cases in proportion to the total 
number of plants, or bolls, originally chosen for testing. 
This number was 5 in 75 in the original trials, but it must 
be remembered that not all the vicinistic pollen parents 
will have characters dominant over those of the mother 
plant; in any one character the chances will be even for 
or against such recognition. These chances can be reduced 
by taking more than one character, but when the two 
intercrossed characters are identical, or nearly so, the 
observational errors will prevent detection. Thus, we 
shall not be far wrong if we double the number of cases 
observed when working with two pairs of characters, so 
that our figure becomes 10 vicinists in 75, or 13°3 
per cent. 

In the other case we find that some offspring bear 
characters which are recessive to those of the parent. A 
lint of 40 mm. in this case gives rise to some plants with 
20 mm. lint. The presumption here is that the parent 
was a heterozygote, produced by natural crossing in some 
year antecedent to the one in which the seed was taken 
from the field, having been simply self-fertilised in that 
particular year. The number of such F, plants in the 
original total is nevertheless dependent on the amount of 
crossing which takes place every year, and should serve as 
a check upon the direct observation of the former case. If 
now we assume simple Mendelian segregation for the 
characters we employ, or prove it by growing further 
generations from these splitting forms, we see that the 
number of such F, heterozygote plants depends not only 
on the renewal of that number each year by fresh crossing 
but also on its reduction each year by segregation of 
homozygotes from them. 

If crossing to the extent of 10 per cent. per annum 
were naccompanied by segregation, we should find the 
number of vicinists increasing along a logarithmic curve, 
since some of the crossed strains would be re-crossed in 


VII NATURAL CROSSING 115 


subsequent years. Thus, the years would yield :— 
A, 0 per cent., B, 10 per cent., C, 19 per cent., D, 27°1 per 
cent., &c. 

Again, if we start with F, plants, all being identical, 
allow no further crossing, and consider one allelomorphic 
pair only, we shall obtain the following series, P denoting 
homozygotes, and H denoting heterozygotes. A, 100 per 
cent. H. B, 50 per cent. H and 50 percent. P. C, 25 
per cent. H and 75 per cent. P., &. In other words, 
assuming the productivity of H and P to be equal, the 
hybrid form will decrease to infinitely small proportions. 
When two pairs of characters are involved, the rate of 
decrease of H will be slower. Instead of a 1:2: 1 ratio 
in the year B, or 2 H:2 P, we shall have the ratio of 
1:1:2:2:4:2:2:1:1,or 12 H:4P, being 25 per cent. 
instead of 50 per cent. of homozygote forms. 

Combining these two antagonistic processes, crossing 
and segregation, we come to the following general 
algebraic statement. 

For y pairs of simple allelomorphs involved in a cross 
we obtain in F, :— 

2y homozygotes (P) from 4y individuals. 

Since crossing is renewed every year we can consider 
this as a general value for purification. 

In each generation let xP become H, by crossing, and 
yH become P, by segregation. 

Then the composition of the crop will be : 


1st Year: PP only. 


Qnd ,, : (l-a)P+aH. 
3rd_,, : {(L—x)?+ay}P + (x(2—-a—y)}H. 
4th ,, : {(l—x)+ay(3—20—y)}P 


+a{3—3(a+y)+(at+y)\H. 
Hence = 
al —-(l-a+y)""'} 
“+y 


nth year: H= 


116 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


When 7 is infinite (or practically in our case when it 
exceeds ten) : 
ofl -(1-ery) =a 
ax 


and = 
ery 


In the 75 cases already mentioned, we found, dealing 
with two pairs of characters, that there were twenty-six 
cases of recessives splitting out from dominants. Thus 
H=28 after years. 

With two pairs of characters 

a 1 
Y= Buz 
And since 
_ & 26 
~aty 75 
. ©=0°132. 


Thus there was 13'2 per cent. of natural crossing as the 
mean value for past years. 

By direct observation we found five vicinists from the 
previous year, implying about ten altogether, or about 
13°3 per cent. of natural crossing in 1904. 

The two results agree. 

The absence of facilities has prevented the author from 
carrying this analysis further by the use of pure strains 
planted under field conditions, but a value of 5 per cent. 
to 10 per cent. for natural crossing under field conditions 
in Egypt has been confirmed by numerous, though non- 
systematic, pieces of evidence. 

This value is expressed in terms of flowers crossed to 
total flowers ripening. ‘The possibility of mixed pollina- 
tion should not be disregarded, since we shall see that 
hybrid and selfed embryos may be formed side by side in 
the same ovary. The expression of the value in terms of 
ovules crossed to ovules ripening would therefore be 
preferable. 


VII NATURAL CROSSING 117 


Prevention.—The evidence as to the means by which 
the cross-pollination takes place is not yet as full as we 
should like it to be, but the greater part is performed by 
bees. Tests for wind-blown pollen made by the author 
with glycerine smears on glass plates have given negative 
results on the breeding plot, though a certain amount of 
pollen must be dislodged in this way in close-sown field 


Fic. 51.—-Nettep PLants. 


First crosses and parents. 


crop.* ‘Ihe remedy, therefore, seems to lie in the 
exclusion of bees from the flower. In most countries this 
can be done by covering the flowers with paper bags, but 
the method fails in Egypt, since about 95 per cent. of 
the flowers thus treated are promptly shed ; this shedding 
appears to be due to the local interference with transpira- 
tion, and consequent over-heating of the tissues. We 
have therefore employed mosquito-nets, which cover the 
whole plant, being supported over it on four posts. 
(Fig. 51). Practically no vicinism then takes place, though 


* See Allard, H. A. (2). 


118 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuaap. 


one or two suspicious cases have been recorded. The 
method has its own disadvantages, however, the first being 
that of expense, while the second is that some strains resent 
the treatment, and refuse to hold their bolls. Rattoon 
plants, 7.e., plants which have been cut back and allowed to 
shoot again in subsequent years, usually grow well under 
the nets, as also do most American Uplands, but—though 
erratically—many Egyptians are failures. When the 
method was first employed we had yet to discover the 
sunshine effect; this effect is precluded from its full 
operation by the permanent veil of netting, and netted 
plants consequently grow during the day, becoming 
abnormally tall. Improvements are being made by 
substituting wire gauze for mosquito net, using larger 
cages, and so forth, since the perfection of some preven- 
tive method of this nature lies at the very foundation of 
all cotton-breeding and of seed-supply.” 

Another obvious possibility is the discovery, or manu- 
facture, of a cleistogamic flower, which shall obstinately 
refuse to admit foreign pollen to its style. At one stage 
of these researches the author seemed to be well on the 
road to success in this direction, and the story of the 
ultimate failure is not without suggestiveness. 

The short-style flower.—At the time when it was 
being realised that natural crossing would be a permanent 
source of trouble, confusion, and error, the question of 
floral structure naturally came under consideration. No 
hint of the existence of uncrossable cotton flowers * could 
be found, but it seemed reasonable to expect that if we 
could decrease the opportunity for foreign pollen to reach 
the style, we might expect vicinism to diminish.” 

V The cotton flower has a dense brush of anthers, borne on 
a cylindrical column, through the centre of which the 
style projects. The length of this style, and the extent 


* Compare Howard and Howard recently on the related genus Hibiscus. 


vil NATURAL CROSSING 11g 


to which it protrudes, varies in different strains and 
species. Most American Uplands have a much shorter style 
than Egyptians, and plants were noticed in F, of Upland 
Egyptian crosses, whose styles did not protrude beyond 
the column. The inheritance was therefore investigated 
statistically, and from a cross of 29 mm. style with 20 mm. 
column, upon 24 mm. style with 13 mm. column, we bred 
several strains with such flowers as the one shown in the 
frontispiece. The plant from which this flower was photo- 
graphed was an F,, and its descendants were grown up to 
F,, still breeding true to this flower form. In F, they had 
a mean style length of 184 mm. with a column of 
144 mm.: the anther filaments being 44 mm. long made 
up the length of the brush to 19 mm., which sufficed to 
cover the style completely, so that it was visible only in 
end view, whereas the style of the Egyptian parent had 
projected for more than half a centimetre. 

The short-style flower was thus at our disposal, but 
without avail. Four such plants from an F;, similar to 
this respect, but otherwise differing, which had been 
growing close together in 1908, gave the following 
offspring in 1909: A. 26 plants; 7 rogues. B. 19 plants; 
5 rogues. C. 47 plants; 16 rogues. D. 36 plants; 
12 rogues. 

The percentage of rogues due to undoubted natural 
crossing in the four families was thus respectively 
26, 26, 34, and 33. ‘The control families grown from 
long-style brothers of these, gave the same range of 
variation, from 25 to 35 per cent. These figures have 
been extended since, but without improvement, and we 
are driven to the conclusion that the accessibility of the 
style is a minor factor in natural crossing, under the con- 
ditions of our breeding plot. 

The figures for the breeding plot had always been so 
much higher than the 5 to 10 per cent. on which we 
decided for field conditions, that this last reverse led the 


120 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cwHar, 


author to reconsider the whole subject from a_ totally 
different point of view. 
The breeding plot (Figs. 52a and 52b).—We have 


thus far found that floral structure has no protective effect. 
In addition it should be noted that the geoeraphical 
position of any plant on the plot seems to make but little 
difference ; in two cases we have found natural hybrids 


Fic. 52s.—THr BREEDING Puov. 


bearing a semi-red leaf, being first-crosses with a single 
plant of Willett’s Red-Leaf, which was kept in a corner of 
the plot from year to year ; these natural crosses had been 
made over a distance of 50 metres, the interval being 
eecupied by dozens of other plants.* Further, we have 
found indications that different varieties. or even different 
plants, growing side by side, show differences in their 


* See, however, Leake, H. M. (4). 


VII NATURAL CROSSING 121 


hability to natural crossing ; we have just stated that such 
differences cannot be due to any obvious cause such as 
position or floral structure, so we are driven back upon a 
more abstruse explanation. 

The hypothesis which has been framed to account for 
the facts observed is based upon an analogy drawn by 


Prof. Marshall Ward many years ago, between the pollen 


Fic. 528.—THE BreEepine Prior. 


Irrigating Sudanese Tree-Cottons. 


tube and the hypha of a parasitic fungus. We find in 
mycology that within the same strain of host-plant, different 
species and varieties of the same fungus possess different 
infection-capabilities. Conversely, the same fungus may 
he able to attack one strain of its host-plant with ease, 
while another strain may be practically immune. 

Using these facts to help us in forming conceptions as to 
the possible behaviour of pollen, we see at once that some 


122 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


such assumption as to differential susceptibility and in- 
fectivity between any style-pollen pair would lead us along 
way. The method which has been employed by the author in 
testing this possibility, though on a very small scale as yet, 
is a method of mixed pollination. Equal quantities of 
foreign pollen and self pollen are placed on the style of a 
flower at the same time, as early as possible in the morning 
and the two sets of grains are allowed to compete with one 
another in the race down the style. The fact that artificial 
hybrids can easily be made between Upland and Egyptian 
in either direction shows that neither style is immune 
from the other pollen. Nevertheless it is quite possible 
that the tube from self pollen may grow faster in its own 
style than a foreign tube cando. Thus, on account of some 
effect, probably toxic, but as yet obscure, the foreign 
pollen-tube is beaten in the race down the style, and the 
majority of ovules are fertilised by the first arrivals, or 
self-tubes. 

Using such a method, with all possible precautions to 
ensure equal opportunity to both sets of grains, we found 
that mixed pollinations of Egyptian by Upland, and the 
reverse, gave us ten natural hybrids in 330 ovules 
fertilised, or 3 per cent. of vicinism under the most favour- 
able conditions for its manifestation. There was no 
significant difference between the reciprocal mixings. 
This figure is far below the minimum which we can 
possibly admit for field vicinism between plants of the 
same nominal variety. A new factor must therefore be 
involved, and we shall, in terms of our hypothesis, denote 
it as “relative immunity,” regarding the pollen-tube of 
one kind as parasitic on the style of the other. 

A curious side-light on this result is given by the Hindi 
cotton. Though the latter plant crosses readily with 
Egyptian under artificial treatment, and though it may 
amount in some fields to 15 per cent. of the crop, yet 


Hindi x Egyptian hybrids are merely frequent in the 


VII NATURAL CROSSING 12% 


field. Certainly the error of natural crossing must be less 
between Hindi and Egyptian than between two Egyptians. 

With a value of 3 per cent. for American and Egyptian, 
and of 10 per cent. for Egyptian and Egyptian, under the 
most favourable conditions, the occurrence of such values 
as 85 per cent., mentioned above, leads us to suspect that 
the story is not yet complete. 

Before proceeding further we must define the value of 
our “percentage vicinism” with more exactitude. We are 
agreed that computation on the basis of the number of 
ovules is the most precise, but it remains to decide how 
we shall recognise those ovules. The difficulty which 
arises in recognition is due to the fact that all F, hybrids, 
and most F, hybrids, germinate much more energetically 
than their parents. In this peculiarity lies the great 
weakness of simple “selection methods.” The precise 
reasons for this difference are still not clear, but knowledge 
of the fact is very old. It is therefore not sufficient to 
count the number of vicinists in a population raised from 
contaminated seed ; we shall be nearer to the truth if we 
take the ratio of vicinists to the number of seeds sown, 
thus assuming that all the seeds which did not establish 
themselves were pure-bred. In inter-Egyptian crossing 
this factor will be insignificant as compared with its 
importance in crosses of Egyptian with Upland. In the 
latter case the author has been the victim of such 
absurdities as the cultivation of a family which contained 
100 per cent. of vicinists ; the soil tilth was not good, the 
weather was cool, and between the two perils of 
mechanical resistance and “ sore-shin” not a single selfed 
embryo survived. 

When attempting to account for amounts of real 
vicinism which rise as high as 30 per cent., we must 
consider the nature of the pollen to be found on the 
breeding-plot. This plot has contained cottons from 
Egypt, from America, from India; indigenous cottons 


124 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  caap. 


from Arizona, from the Sudan, ete. More than this, it has 
contained plants of F,, F:, F3, F,, F;, and F,, raised from 
crosses between American Uplands and Egyptian. Con- 
fining our discussion for the sake of simplicity to the F, of 
such crosses, it is obvious that we possess an infinite 
variety of pollen grains on an acre of land. To estimate 
the number of allelomorphic pairs involved in the cross of 
“38” (King) with “89” (Charara) at fifty would be very 
conservative. The number of possible combinations of 
these pairs works out at a figure which, for our present 
purpose, we may consider as infinite. Now, if Mendelism 
is not a delusion, this infinite number of combinations 
corresponds with an infinite variety of nuclear composi- 
tion, on the part of the male gametes. It is true that 
these gamete-nuclei are devoted to sexual purposes, but 
their relations, the vegetative nuclei of the pollen grains, 
are generally admitted to control the growth of the pollen- 
tube, and these are of identical composition with the 
gamete nuclei. Consequently, we may reasonably expect 
to find some correlation, however indirect it may be, 
between the gametic differences and the physiological 
differences in growth-rate of the pollen-tube. Such relation 
would imply a greater ‘“‘ variability” in the growth 
processes of pollen tubes from an F, flower than that 
which we find in a pure strain. The standard deviation, 
or probable error, in the behaviour of F, pollen-tubes 
under a given set of conditions would necessarily be much 
greater than that of the pollen-tubes in a pure strain, 
whether Egyptian or American. 

Regarded in another way, this conclusion may be stated 
thus. If 3 per cent. of the pollen-tubes from Upland 
pollen fluctuate sufficiently in a positive direction to enable 
them to beat 3 per cent. of the Egyptian pollen-tubes in a 
race down an Eeyptian style, then we may expect— 
owing to greater variability—that much more than 3 per 
cent. of F, plant pollen-tubes will vary sufficiently in a 


VII NATURAL CROSSING r35, 


positive direction. Hence, in mixed pollination of F, upon 
parent, we should find a higher percentage of vicinists. 

The steps of the preceding argument were taken long 
before the experimental results were available. These 
results were as follows :— 


Mixed pollination of F, upon Egyptian ... 20/100 or 
20 per cent. 


Mixed pollination of F, upon er . 25/65 or 28 
per cent. 


Even allowing for all possible errors, and for the scanty 
numbers of ovules involved, the difference between 3 per 
cent. and 24 per cent. as values for the ‘“ prepotency” of 
mother-parent and of F, pollen, under the same experi- 
mental conditions, cannot be without significance. 

Hence, we conclude that some part of the F, pollen from 
an inter-specific cross is prepotent over all other pollen ; 
that self pollen is prepotent over pollen from some other 
species ; and that pollen from other species only makes its 
way to the ovule with difficulty. 

Gametic differentiation.—A conclusion which may 
be immediately drawn from these differences in prepotency 
of pollen is, that the error from natural crossing is likely 
to be less in the field—where it is difficult to avoid—-than 
on the breeding plot, where it can be avoided by appro- 
priate, though expensive methods. 

Again, it is within the bounds of possibility that 
immune strains might be discovered or developed. Such 
discovery is scarcely probable, but it may as well be 
borne in mind. 

The chief speculation in which we may legitimately 
indulge relates to gametic differentiation. If our postulate 
as to correlation between gametic composition of the 
microspore nucleus and growth-processes of the pollen 
tube can be substantiated, it follows that those tubes 
which succeed during mixed-pollination must possess 


~ 


126 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cua.vir 


certain gametic characteristics. A detailed statistical 
study of the composition of F, plants resulting from such 
mixed pollinations has been begun, and if we can find any 
constant deflection of the frequency curves from expecta- 
tion, we shall have a clue as to the nature of the winning 
pollen-grains. 

In other words, our endeavour is to ascertain whether 
differences which are manifest before fertilisation exist 
between F, gametes. Further discussion® would be 
worthless at present, but any clue to gametic differentia- 
tion deserves to be followed up. 


CHAPTER VIII 
HEREDITY—I. 


1. General 


Having discussed physiology, fluctuation, and natural 
crossing, we are now in a position to examine the 
inheritance of characters in crosses between two strains 
of cotton derived from separate reputed species.* 

The evidence to be adduced in the following pages is 
frequently most infirm beyond the second generation. 
Leaving outof account the inefficient conditions under which 
this part of the work has been done (Figs.52a and 52b), 
the chief responsibility for this uncertainty lies with the 
difficulty of preparing self-fertilised seeds. When an F, 
of two hundred plants is to be studied, we desire to avoid 
the use of nets (Fig. 51) owing to their disturbing 
effect upon growth; yet, if nets are not employed, we 
necessarily raise F, families which are contaminated. 
Therefore it is better to dispense with the nets, and to 
rogue out the F, vicinists; very often, however, such 
decisions as to vicinistic origin are based on the appearance 
of abnormal characters which might very well be due in 
reality to some rare gametic combination following self- 
fertilisation ; we thus argue in a circle; a plant shows an 
unexpected characteristic, therefore it is a rogue. We 
have endeavoured to reduce the probability of such un- 
just decisions by a system of voting, whereby no plant 


* The coming economic application of Mendel’s Law to cotton will at first. 
be made through crosses of much more nearly related forms, and hence of 
far greater simplicity than those which the author has chiefly investigated. 

127 


128 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


can be condemned unless it shows incredible abnormalities 
in several characters. Such treatment does aot lend 
itself to precision. 

A way out of the difficulty which has been employed 
several times has been to dispense with netting in F,, 
growing the F; from natural seed, leaving the F, plants 
in the ground as rattoons, and netting any of them which 
appear to be important. The natural F, is thus used for 
indicative, while the selfed F, is used for critical confir- 
mation in the following year. The method involves waste 
of a year, waste of labour, and waste of land, but it seems 
to be the only plan which gives trustworthy data. 

The few crosses which have been made and studied were 
easily effected, taking the usual precautions. 

The F, plant was invariably netted after 1906, and the 
experimental error of the F, data is therefore very low. 

The F, results, on the other hand, which are of supreme 
importance in disentangling the complex F, data, are 
subject to the errors which we have just detailed. The 
same holds good for F, and F;—which is the highest 
generation we have cultivated—though by this time we 
usually know what plants to net, so that the data are 
more likely to be trustworthy; on the other hand 
many such families have been grown but not studied 
critically, through insufficient opportunity. 

The elucidation of inheritance in cotton is thus no light 
task, and should not be undertaken without a residential 
laboratury, ample skilled assistance, and __ financial 
resources. 

The ditticulty of obtaining accurate data beyond F, is so 
much the more regrettable in that the factorial analysis of 
cotton hybrids often requires the highest precision. We 
shall see that the composition of an F, is commonly very 
similar to a Gaussian curve of error; this similarity is 
usually—probably always—fictitious, and is due to the 
appression of several true modes, which blend into one 


vu HEREDITY 129 


another by fluctuation. Part of this blending, moreover, 
is not fluctuation in the ordinary sense, but rather an 
autogenous fluctuation,” provoked by correlation with 
other characters. Thus the modes of seed-weight in an 
F, are not only subject to a P.£. of 12 per cent., but before 
this allowance can be made they have to be corrected for 
correlation with diameter of the boll. 

A simple way of applying such correction is to dissect 
the frequency polygon of the family, isolating the wide- 
boll and the narrow-boll forms, for example, and plotting 
their seed-weights separately (e.g., Fig. 69). Unfortunately 
this method reduces the size of the groups under examina- 
tion, which has never been excessive to begin with, so 
that the precision gained in one direction is lost in 
another. 

Again, since correlation exists between certain 
characters, it might be thought that the slide-rule would 
give the necessary correction. The difficulty here is to 
find out the value and nature of the correlation. The 
simplest Mendelian combination, ABxab, where the 
characters are simply linear measurements, gives a correla- 
tion diagram in F,, which consists of four groups, only 
separable with difficulty even when correlation is perfect 
and linear, which—worked out in the conventional way— 
gives a value for 7 from 0°6 downwards (Fig. 53). There 
does not seem to be any method at present extant by 
which a «quantitative separation of these groups can be 
made.* 

The dithculties enumerated, both of experiment and of 
computation, have prevented the author from making any 
exhaustive statement which can be considered as honest 
from the scientific viewpoint. The results are in the 
main indicative, and suggestive, often strongly so, but in 
all cases open to criticism. 


* W,L.B. 21, and reply by Craig, J. I., Cairo Sci, Jour., August, 1910, 
K 


130 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


In rare cases we have been able to demonstrate the 
existence of Mendelian ratios in F,, confirmed by the 
behaviour of later generations. In others we have failed 
to analyse the F, but have dissected the F;, where the 
phenomena were simpler. In others, again, such analysis 
has been utterly impossible, and we have been obliged to 
rely on the bare fact that a certain character has “ bred 
true” in the end, though we have been unable to trace the 
steps of its purification. As a last infirmity, and last 
resort, we have fallen back on comparisons from year to 
year in massed data: if the graph for seed-weight in F, 
shows certain modes, and if those modes reappear in the 
graph for all the F; plants in the following year, we have 
a claim to assume that the modes are at least due to 
a systematic cause and not to accident. 

The data to be quoted are drawn largely from crosses of 
Egyptian with American Upland, especially from Afifi with 
Truitt Big Boll (No. 252), and from Charara with King 
(No. 255). Other crosses which have been made, but only 
partially examined through lack of space and labour, are 
Hindi x Charara, King x Russell, Russell x Charara, and 
Sultani x King. In the early stages of the work many 
natural hybrids were examined, which had resulted from 
natural crossing between Egyptian cottons, while full 
analysis has been made up to F, in an inter-Egyptian cross 
between Afifi and another Sultani. The phylogenetic 
relationships of the various parents is doubtful, to say the 
least. The author has leaned to the designation ‘ inter- 
specific,” but this has been questioned, in view of the 
cultivated origin of the parents.* Perhaps a description 
of them as “ reputedly inter-specific” would best meet the 
case. 

The cross of Afifi x Sultani was made with the object 
of studying some simple examples in place of the com- 


* See references ‘‘ Egypt,” in Sir G. Watt’s Monograph, 


Vill 


Computed. 


Py. 
x=60 or A. 
7=80 or B. 
a=0°9. 


Length of Y 


HEREDITY 


Length of X 


131 


40> - - ~45- - -- 50- - --55- - -- 60- - --65- 


(ab) 


P, : " 
(aB) 


(Ab) 


Exeperimental.—-F, of King x Charara. 
Length of Petal in mm. 


SIS BD Se SS SAF So SAG Ss Se SAG Soe) BGR Ree SEOs SSG 5 = 


Length of Style in mm. 
rrrrBrrrvsBrrvriBrrriBrirrira 


. . 
. 
. ee 
5 . 
. . . 
. 
‘! . . 
. cy . 
ee rs 
Pa 7 . ae 
ee . 
ee 
. . . 
. whee OF 
= % ery 
. . ote 
o fete 
. 
oe . 
‘ . 
oe 
+ . 
eee 
oe 
. ee 


Cus 
: F, 


Fig. 53.—CorRELAtION DiaGRamM FoR Two Parrs or 


ALLELOMORPHS. 


K 2 


132 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


plexities presented by the other crosses, but it is as 
complex in its own way as the Upland x Egyptian 
series. It seems to be quite probable that this cross was 
one between the old Peruvian and Sea Island stocks, and 
was hence not very much more intimate than the Upland x 
figypto-Peruvian crosses. 

The author can only reiterate his conviction that all 
these hybrids are subject to Mendel’s Law of segregation ; 
often obscurely—on account of defective methods— 
but none the less certainly. The evidence available can 
all be interpreted in Mendelian terms, and it is very 
significant that most of it should appear at first glance to 
be completely dissociated from the classical ratios, 
Mendelian students of heredity have confined themselves 
to the more definable characters, such as colour, partly 
because statistical characters take up an excessive amount of 
time in mere determination, and partly because the use of 
statistical methods is prone to provoke irrelevant criticism 
from mathematicians with whom the mere biologist cannot 
fairly compete. At the same time it is clear that the 
frontier of Mendel’s territory is not demarcated by any 
special character, and—with all their experimental 
disadvantages—the only characters which admit of 
complete treatment are those which can be measured with 
definable precision. 

There are many features of these complex results which 
bear a tantalising resemblance to problems of human 
heredity. 

Record system.—The examples to be quoted in 
these pages are drawn from a systematic set of records. 
These records are compiled from three sources, the Field- 
Books, Field-Cards, and the Laboratory-Books, in which 
the actual observations are entered. These are then worked 
up at the end of the year in two ways; first in the 
Files, and secondly in the Ledgers. The Files consist of 
printed forms, one to every plant, on which are entered all 
particulars available ; the file-sheet of the plant shown in 


VII HEREDITY 133 


Fig. 54 is reproduced in Fig. 55. The Ledgers collect the 
data from all plants of a family under the head of each 
character separately ; this is conveniently done in the form 
of frequency polygons, in which the number of each 
individual is written; Fig. 48 reproduces a page of the 
ledger dealing with the height of the offspring of a plant 
which was brother to that shown in Figs. 54 and 55. The 
polygons elsewhere reproduced have had the component 
plant-numbers omitted in order to save space. Lastly, a 
Card Index of the completed ledgers enables any fact about 
any plant to be found immediately. 


li. Qualitative Characters. 


Those characters which are not easily subjected to 
statistical expression are dealt with in this sub-chapter. 

The Leaf-spot.—The development of anthocyanin in 
the leaf, which finds its fullest expression in the Red-Leaf 
sports, is usually noticeable at the point where the petiole 
begins to branch into the main veins. In Uplands, and 
in Hindi, this leaf-spot is conspicuous, and forms a useful 
diagnostic character in the seedlings for comparison with 
Egyptians, whose leaf-spot is fainter, smaller, and pink 
rather than crimson. The character varies with the water 
equilibrium and illumination of the plant, like all antho- 
cyanin characters. ‘The F, of the ‘spotted by relatively 
spotless” cross bears an intermediate spot. In F, the 
ratio of the three forms accords closely with 1:2:1. 
Extracted full-spot and spotless breed true, without known 
exceptions. 

General colour of the leaf.—The Upland cottons 
possess a leaf lamina of much lighter hue than the 
Egyptians. This difference in colour is real, and inde- 
pendent of differences in hirsuteness, &c. The inheritance 
of the character, or character-complex, is unknown, except 
that large families have been found to breed true to one 
or the other colour after F,. 


134 THE COTION PLANT IN EGYPT cHar. 


The matter might be of importance with regard to 
photosynthesis. 

Colour of petal.—The limb of the petal, apart from 
the colour of the basal spot, which we shall discuss shortly, 


E 


Fic. 54.—TypicaL PLant or *‘77."” Jury 10, 1909. 


ranges in colour from almost pure white to a rich golden 
vellow. Each pure strain of cotton has a definite petal 
eolour, which is white to creamy in Uplands and Hindi, 
while in Egyptian families it ranges from lemon to golden. 


VIL HEREDITY 
FamiLy 77(B)@&) PLANT <3 
Date of Sowing 
Seedling Condition. . , 
Adult Condition . 
Leaf. 


Spot......... Werre...... Hirsuteness ... Gladic--?, 
Averages: on, 3 . toaves: — L S68 fo. 18° Lb 7° 


Stem. Height:— 0) 4&6 (2). 7... @). /29 (4) BF © .MS © La 


Foatriily om 165° (8) 165. (ATO C0) (6S) 170 Gy | 


Cg , 
Branching... Scares ¢ 7 hati 
FlOWEr. seticscigee cenistianas P Weeks ending Saturday: 
Colour: — Petal, rch Y. | wre | duly | Ave. | Sept | Oc. | Nov. | Dee. 
Spot, Fuk... | 
Anther,,  Yeeloaer ‘a Cd fa 
K yp 
Formon \3. . Flowers, 
Petal. 60 maStyle FA mre] 
Bract 099. Column, ZO m4 59 
Filament 4% tm] rant H-+4 4 Total, 
First Flowers. - 47. 27 (fons) dese 4 PER eet N LI 16 292.8 
Maturation, //* aq 46 dap ry 2 i 3 hi =) 7 a 


Boll. Goll-Shedding.. 40. Firat Boll gry! 
Surface. . 27: f Divisions, on G7.. bolls: 27 


Averages on ....3 bolls: — Form. 0:60. Size: 243. mt 


Seed. Fuzz... Mav o£ 
Weight on .<3/6 | Seeds: — silliest Out-tunn .. OS Aets 
Lint. 


Length 27 mee (30)... Colour . Weigh. 9°94.0 4 


TF 


Expert’s report: — 


Notes:— .. T°Acta Fas joe. 


Fru. 55, 


135 


136 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


White and creamy petals are not difficult to find in 
Egyptian field crop, but their ancestry is dubious ; some 
may be true Egyptians, but most are splitting-forms from 
Hindi x Egyptian hybrids. 

The hybridisation of these forms has not given a simple 
result in any cross yet made by the author. Mr. Fyson 
has published details from large families of Indian cottons, 
which indicate that the character was there controlled by 
a single pair of allelomorphs, but the data are not quite 
convincing as to this simplicity, and the same uncertainty 
is found by Mr. Leake (3). 

The cross Afifi x Sultani was a cross of golden petal x 
lemon petal. The F, was intermediate. In F, we 
matched the offspring to the three forms, taking three 
flowers from each plant on different days. It should be 
remembered that the colour differences between these 
three forms are not very great, although the parents are 
quite distinct from one another. Many plants were 
matched to the same type-colour each time, but many 
others were matched first to one and then to another. 
The probability seems to be that there are more than 
three colour types in the F,, just as in Tammes’ work on 
hybrids of Zanwm, so that our matchings may mean very 
little. 

On the simplest interpretation of the data we might 
imagine that the heterozygote was a simple intermediate, 
throwing outa 1:2:1 ratioin F,. The figures are too 
discrepant to admit of this view. They tend more towards 
the interpretation based on two pairs of allelomorphs, 
giving a ratio of 9:3:3:1, where the last two are 
externally similar, making the ratio into 9:3: 4. 

The crosses of Egyptian with Upland have behaved in a 
similar way. The cross of yellow—whether lemon or 
golden—with white or cream has always given an inter- 
mediate F, In F, we have obtained ratios which 
approached very closely to 1;2:1, but with a constant 


Vl HEREDITY i} 


excess of the paler parental colour-type. Testing this on 
the assumption of a 9:3:4 ratio, we obtained consistent 
results up to a certain point. Whites and some full 
yellows bred true, some intermediates threw out all colours 
like the F,; other intermediates threw whites only, 
while yet others threw only the full parental yellow, 
giving approximate 3:1 ratios in both cases. It seemed 
at one stage that the double-pair hypothesis had met all 
contingencies, until the following test was applied. 

A family raised from an F; plant which bore the 
intermediate colour had given twenty-two intermediates 
to seven full yellows. Six of these F, intermediates 
were grown into F,; the obvious expectation was that 
four should throw out yellows, while two should breed 
true to the intermediate colour. The actual result was 
that none threw any yellows at all, but all threw whites. 
These whites were not, moreover, of the same colour as 
the parent white, but much nearer the intermediate itself. 
The figures for the six families, in ratio of ‘intermediate : 
new white” were (4:0), 21:5, 16:9, 26:1, 10:1, 11:3. 
The families were almost gametically pure in all other 
known respects, and all vicinists had been eradicated. 

From this evidence it is plain that petal colour 
in crosses of Upland by Egyptian may be controlled by 
not less than three pairs of allelomorphs. The presump- 
tion is that our matching methods are not sufficiently 
precise, and that some form of colorimetric grading is 
needed. Even the inter-Egyptian cross shows the same 
peculiarities. 

We shall see that similar evidence is to hand in the 
next character to be considered, together with a strong 
probability for gametic coupling. If the colour and 
marking of a flower’s petal is controlled by at least five 
allelomorphic pairs, complicated by gametic interaction, it 
need not surprise us to find that the modes of seed-weight 
in F,, for instance, are not very definite. 


138 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


On the other hand, far more complex analyses of flower 
colour have been proved indisputably for such plants as 
Antirrhinum, Matthiola, Lathyrus, &c.,* so that the 
indications of our fragmentary evidence may be considered 
as quite probable, even in a simple sap-colour. 

Petal .spot.—The Egyptian flower is characterised 
by a rich crimson spot at the base of the petal. This spot 
is not so large as in G. herbacewm, where it occupies the 
whole of the petal claw, but it is conspicuous. The 
typical Upland cottons and Hindi have no such spot, the 
petal being self-coloured. The intensity of the spot may 
differ within commercial Egyptian varieties, like the petal 
colour. Similarly, commercial stocks of, e.g., “ King” 
Upland contain a notable proportion of plants with spots 
on their petals. Such differences are probably due to 
doubtful pedigree. 

A cross between ‘‘ full spot”” Egyptian and “ spotless’ 
Upland gives an intermediate F,. The F, spot is smaller, 
more vague in outline, and less noticeable than the spot of 
the Egyptian parent. In cases where the latter had a spot 
which was relatively small, the F, is proportionately 
inconspicuous. 

In F, the ratios are very erratic. Taking them in 
the order “full: intermediate : none,” we find two families 
from F, sister plants giving 11:22:18, and 23:42:31. 
In this case the ratio approximates to 1:2:1, but it is 
closer to 3:9:4, and the divergence from even this is 
more than can be explained by errors of observation. 
Probably, as in the case of petal colour, there are more 
classes than we have admitted. This view is substantiated 
by the fact that we have been unable to discriminate in 
many cases between “Full” and “Full?”. As in the 
case of petal colour we find that ‘‘ spotless” breeds true, 
while “full” may either breed true or break, and inter- 


* See Bateson, Saunders, Baur, Wheldale, Xe, 


VII HEREDITY 139 


mediates break in at least two different ways. Probably 
there are again two allelomorphic pairs concerned. 

Another series of crosses gave an entirely different set 
of ratios. One of these was derived from an Egyptian 
parent which possessed an inconspicuous petal spot, and 
the divergence from expectation was at first * attributed to 
fluctuation. The ratio in F, was 5:9:47. The other 
series was not open to this interpretation, since the 
Egyptian parent had a fully-developed petal spot, while 
the F, ratio was 27:41:112. If we assume that the 
petal spot in the latter cross was controlled by two 
allelomorphic pairs, with 3:1:1:3 gametic coupling, 
while the “ full spot” class consisted of two groups which 
were practically indistinguishable, we obtain a theoretical 
ratio which is very close to actuality, viz., 25:40:115. 

It is inadvisable to discuss the point more fully, since 
we require much larger series of numbers than those the 
author can present, before a decision can be taken as to the 
probability of this view. The consistently erratic 
behaviour of the spotted and intermediate forms in F, 
supports such interpretation, but the figures available are 
not sufficient to substantiate it. 

The only decisions at which we can arrive with certainty 
are :—that the presence or absence of the petal spot in 
these Agypto-American crosses is not determined by a 
single pair of allelomorphs, and that there is strong 
evidence for complication of this mechanism by gametic 
coupling in some cases. 

Anther colour.—tThe colour of the central brush of 
stamens is an important feature in the general colour- 
effect of the cotton flower. In Egyptians it is bright 
golden-yellow, in Uplands and Hindi it is whitish, or 
rather buff in colour, and the F, is intermediate. 

In F, we obtain ratios which appear to be genuinely 
1:2:1, and no exceptions have yet been noted in sub- 
sequent generations, The characteristic thus appears to 


140 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


be under the control of a simple pair of allelomorphs, so 
far as evidence is available. 

This presentment does not exhaust the possibilities, for 
a family of King Upland, grown from seed of a selected 
plant, showed itself to be a hybrid in this respect. The 
anther colour of the selected parent was pale lemon, which 
broke up on self-fertilisation into 24 lemon: 8 buff. The 
‘latter have since bred true, as have some of the lemons. In 
this case the pair was simple, with dominance of more 
colour over less colour. 

Hirsuteness.—The hairiness of the plant involves a 
number of factors; one type of hair may be confined to 
the leaf-lamina, another to the veins, another to the stem, 
and so forth. During our studies of this character in 
cotton we have examined only the petiole of the leaf. 

The Egyptian cottons have glabrous petioles, the 
American Upland petioles are more or less hirsute, and 
the F, petiole is almost glabrous. The author's first 
published mention of this character®* stated that the 
glabrous form was completely dominant. In almost all 
other plants the reverse is true, and further complications 
were expected when Mr. Holton discovered that a few 
long but scanty hairs were present on the F, petiole. 

Early classifications of F, and F; in which glabrous and 
intermediate were grouped together as non-hirsute, gave 
ratios of “‘non-hirsute: hirsute” as 111:37, 58:17, 
43:9, &c. On cultivating some extracted hirsutes in F, 
we found six out of seven breeding true to hirsuteness, 
while one broke up, giving 31: 8, the eight being of the 
F, type. Moreover, we found that the extracted forms 
differed in the length and density of their hairs, and that 
segregation in this respect was indicated within the limits 
of the hirsute group. 

A very careful classification was then made on the 
F, of another Upland-Egyptian cross, which gave the 


following results : 


Vill HEREDITY 141 


Like Egyptian parent... o.oo 48 
Doubtfully Egyptian dene Lhe Steer alan) cube 8 
Doubtfully like PF)... 1 
Like F, (scanty hairs on dorsum) sis ithe lage 71 
Like F,, but with more hairs... ... 0 0... 6 
Like Upland, but shorter Wale Age Gas) ase 10 
Like Upland parent... ...0 6. ae 19 
Like Upland, but denser... ... 0... 0.0. 12 

Total. see eax’ sae? fe wee! eas 175 


Thirty-five of these plants were grown on to F;, but 
their families were not sufficiently large. One notable 
feature was that an “F, type” plant gave thirteen off- 
spring like itself, and no other forms. Other similar 
plants threw the glabrous type only, while others again 
behaved like the F, itself. Some of the differences 
which had been recorded between the F, plants seemed 
to be due to fluctuation, but the general trend of the 
evidence is to the same conclusion as in the characters 
already discussed, namely, gametic complexity, possibly 
with length and density as component factors. 

It should be added that families of fifty plants have 
been grown in F;, which bred true to new types of 
hirsuteness, such as the felty class described above “like 
Upland, but shorter.” 

Since the hirsuteness, or rather the glabrousness, of all 
Egyptians is practically the same, we have no data for 
simpler crosses. It might be well to investigate the 
character in a cross of glabrous Hindi with hirsute 
Hindi. 

The stipule.—During examination of Afifi x Sultani 
F, it was noticed* that the form of the stipule was 
very different in the two parents. The Sultani parent 
had long narrow stipules, while the stipules of the Afifi 
parent were about four times as wide for the same length. 

The F, stipule was long and narrow like the Sultani 
parent. 


* By Mr. F. S. Holton. 


142 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


In F, we found, by simple matching, that 48 plants 
had stipules like the Afifi, 59 like the Sultani, while 27 
were recorded as doubtful. 

The evidence is inconclusive, but it again points to 
some slight complexity, possibly a ratio of 9:7. 

The surface and glandulation of the boll.—All 
parts of the cotton plant, other than the root, contain 
abundant resin glands, which produce the characteristic 
black speckling externally. The depth at which these 
glands are situated in the ovary wall is characteristic of 
different kinds of cotton plants. In most Egyptian bolls 
they are near the epidermis, which is depressed above 
them, forming small craters. In American Uplands we 
find the glands situated much further below the epidermis, 
which is not depressed, so that the surface of the boll is 
smooth, and the speckling is scarcely visible. The F, of 
these two forms is intermediate, though more like the 
Egyptian parent. 

A large number of bolls have been pickled and sectioned 
in the attémpt to understand the inheritance of this 
character. It appears to be straightforward, but the 
evidence is not convincing. The appearance of the surface 
is not solely dependent on the glandulation ; Egyptian 
bolls are bright green and shiny, while Upland bolls are of 
a dull, grey-green colour. Some structural differences are 
also shown by the microscope. 

Thus the fact that an F, was matched into 17 Uplands: 
33 F, type: 14 Egyptian type, must not be taken as 
evidence of simple segregation. The data from F;,, &c., 
lead to the same uncertain views as in the more definite 
characters of the flower colours. 

The distribution of seed fuzz.—The differences 
between various strains of Egyptian cotton in this respect 
range from complete nakedness to a woolly coat which 
covers all but the back of the seed. The former are 
’ indistinguishable from Hindi seeds, but most of them 


Vill HEREDITY 143 


give rise to plants which bear no sign of any Hindi 
ancestor. 

Plants bearing seed with entire fuzz are occasionally 
found, but these appear to originate from crossing with 
Hindi. 

Hindi cotton, on the other hand, always bears naked 
seeds, while typical American Uplands are entirely fuzzy. 
Naked-seeded sports occurring in the Upland crop have 
been discussed by Allard (1) and in the Indian crop by 
Fyson. 

Several natural hybrids have been bred on from 
Egyptian cottons. In all cases they have given a simple 
3:1 ratio, more fuzz being dominant over less fuzz, 
and expectation has been fulfilled in F;. The cross of 
Afifi x Sultani behaved in the same way ; some fluctuation 
was shown, but the groups were clearly 116: 41 in F,. 

In crosses of any Egyptian with American Upland, we 
meet with complications. The entire fuzz is dominant, 
and the F, has given such 15 : 1 ratios of “ entire : slight” 
as 97:6, 180:11, &. The naked seed breeds true in F,, 
and has continued to do so till F,, while the entire fuzz 
either breeds true, or breaks up. There are indications 
that the latter process may give either a 3:1 ratio, ora 
15:1 ratio, but the figures are too small. Further, there 
are indications of constant differences in the entire fuzz 
group, some being woolly, while others are felted ; if a 
woolly seed does not breed true, it may throw out felted 
seeds in a 8:1 ratio. Felted seeds, which may be 
regarded as a step towards the Egyptian fuzz type, do not 
throw woolly ones. 

It would seem that two pairs of allelomorphs are here 
implicated, giving a 15:1 ratioin F, The fifteen appear 
to consist of 12 woolly and 3 felted. In F, we find all the 
nakeds breeding true, some woollys throwing felted only, 
some throwing naked only, and some throwing both, while 
the felted forms either breed true or throw nakeds only. 


144 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


An interesting proof of the tangibility of these 
gradations in fuzziness was afforded by a natural hybrid 
from Abbassi, bearing normal Egyptian slight fuzz on its 
seed. When selfed it threw recessive wholly naked seed 
derived from an unknown pollen parent. When it was 
crossed with American Upland we raised seven F, families, 
four of which contained the typical Egyptian seed as one 
plant in sixteen, while three contained the naked seed in 
the same proportion. 

The behaviour of Hindi, the seed of which is devoid of 
fuzz, when crossed with Egyptian (Charara) has been 
somewhat remarkable. In the first generation the seed 
was entirely fuzzy, like an Upland. This was probably a 
case of reversion due to the meeting of cryptomeres, and it 
was naturally expected *” that the F, would show a ratio 
of 9:3:3:1, both the Egyptian fuzz and the Hindi fuzz 
reappearing. An unsuccessful sowing gave “ 14 entire :3 
Egyptian,” which seemed to support this view. In the 
following year a family of 130 F, plants was raised, but 
without producing a single Hindi seed ; the result was the 
same as if Uplands had been used instead of Hindi, 
namely, “123 entire: 7 Egyptian.” The absence of the 
Hindi type in a family of this size can scarcely be 
accidental, and a few more crosses of this kind might 
throw light on the phylogeny of the Hindi cotton. 

This complex inheritance is made even more interesting 
by the fact that a cross of the same Hindi strain with a 
natural hybrid of Hindi and Afifi yielded simple 
segregation of the naked Hindi seed in F). 

Summarising the evidence with respect to this character 
we have tolerably convincing data as to the increasing 
complexity of inheritance when passing from varietal to 
reputedly inter-specific crosses, this complication taking 
the form of an additional pair of allelomorphs. In one 
ease we have found reversion through the meeting of 
cryptomeres, and in general it would seem that the less 


Cal 


VIII HEREDITY 145 


fuzzy cottons have been evolved from primitive cottons 
with entire fuzz by the loss of factors. The particular factor 
lost has not been the same in certain strains of Egyptian 
as in others, nor as in Hindi; hence we obtain reversion in 
some crosses, though not in others. No case of reversion 
in inter-Egyptian crosses has yet been noted, but it is 
quite conceivable. 

Colour of the seed-fuzz.—The presence and absence 
of colour in the fuzz-hairs appear to form a Mendelian 
pair. It is not easy to decide on the absence of colour, 
since the colouring matter is unstable, and in some cases 
fades very easily. There may be essential differences 
between green and brown fuzz, but the former fades very 
readily into the latter. 

The quantity of fuzz on the parent is not coupled with 
colour. Thus, seeds which are practically naked, except 
for a most minute tuft of coloured hairs at the tip, will 
give rise, on crossing with white entire fuzz, to an F, 
possessing green entire fuzz. It is interesting to note 
that this phenomenon, together with the F, resulting, has 
been described * as an instance of the failure of Mendel’s 
Law ; it was expected that ‘ black seed” should form an 
allelomorphic pair with ‘‘ white seed.” 

Distribution of lint on the seed.—Parallel with the 
seed-fuzz distribution and colour, we find characters of lint 
distribution and colour. 

The distribution of the lint is not easily recorded, there 
‘being a large subjective error involved by the combing 
which is required before it can be seen. Crosses of 
“irregular” with “regular” give a “regular” F,, and 
segregation certainly seems to occur. The most convincing 
example. of this was an F, from a “regular” F, plant. 
The irregularly covered seeds were clearly defined, so that 
the curve for weight of lint per seed showed a very 


* Cook, O. F. (1). 


146 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


definite mode at the light end, consisting of eight plants as 
against twenty-two in the rest of the curve.” The 
extremes of the curve were 0-012 g. and 0038 g. 
while the modes were situated at 0°018 g. and 0-032 g. 
respectively. 

We may reason by analogy that the lint distribution 
will behave in much the same way as the fuzz-distribution, 
and may possibly be coupled with it in part. 

Colour of the lint.—The first crosses made between 
Egyptians with brown lint, and Uplands with white lint, 
gave an intermediate F, of creamy hue, with simple 
1:2:1 ratios in F, such as 12:21:11; the whites and 
browns bred true up to the F;, while the creams 
broke up. 

Even in these series there were manifest complications. 

Thus, while never transgressing the limits of ‘ brown- 
ness,” the extracted browns were by no means uniform, 
some being much darker than the Afifi parent, while 
others were lighter. We have not yet decided whether 
these differences were gametic, or whether they were 
due to “autogenous fluctuation” with other characters. 

Another cross, that of Charara x King, where the parents 
were very light brown Egyptian, and white American, gave 
an intermediate F, as before, but the F, consisted of 
“<9 brownish: 60 creamy: 109 white.” This classification 
was made by a cotton expert, and not by the author. It 
is curiously reminiscent of the inheritance of petal spot, 
with its suggestion of gametic coupling. 

The lint from F,; of this family, and from all other 
families grown since, has never been examined by an 
expert, and since this is peculiarly a case where outside. 
judgments are best, the author prefers to leave the 
discussion at this stage. 

The ‘‘style” of the lint.—At present we are 
completely in the dark as to the real nature of the 
differences between such lints as Upland and Egyptian. 


VIII HEREDITY 147 


We know that the lint hair of the former is shorter and of 
greater diameter than the lint-hair of Egyptian, but there 
are other differences which the microscrope cannot as yet 
determine, though to the fingers of the expert grader of 
lint they are far more obvious than is the colour to 
his eye. 

The F, of Aigypto-Upland crosses is always a superfine 
Egyptian. Thus, the mating of a “ bread-and-cheese” 
Egyptian with a short-staple Upland gives a first cross 
bearing such lint as is required by the fine spinner. In 
the early stages of these researches we denoted this general 
peculiarity of these hybrids as “ first-cross intensification,” 
in the hope of explanation later. In many characters this 
explanation has been since obtained, but not in 
respect of the “style” of the lint. Until we know the 
component elements of “style” we cannot make much 
advance. It is safe to expect that such intensified 
characters will regress to the parental normal in later 
generations, but further knowledge might enable us to 
purify the particular combination of allelomorphs which 
leads to this immediate improvement. In point of fact 
we have raised families which breed true to an extremely 
fine and strong Sea Island type of lint, from the cross of 
King with Charara; the lint of the latter parent was of 
the Abbassi type. 

From what has been said above it will be clear that the 
“style” of a lint sample is the resultant of an unknown 
number of unknown factors, both zygotic and gametic. 
When a set of F, samples is placed before an expert, this 
becomes obvious; the expert finds one lint which 
resembles Afifi, except that it has the colour of Yannovitch ; 
he next meets another which has the colour of Afifi, but 
which he would unhesitatingly afirm to be American 
Upland if the room were darkened. The task of analysing 
an F, in this way is almost hopeless, however valuable 
the results may be for other purposes. The author is 

L 2 


148 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


much indebted to three Alexandrian gentlemen,* who have 
assisted him in the past, by their expert opinion, given 
under all the difficulty involved by the smallness of the 
samples available, and their results, though open to these 
objections, are summarised thus :— 

Afifi x Truitt:—F,, Yannovitch; F, composed of 
7 Afifi, 24 Abbassi, 22 Yannovitch, together with 17 
Hindi or Upland. Ratio, of Egyptian to non-Egyptian, 
being 53:17. The non-Egyptians bred true in F,, while 
some Egyptians broke up. One plant from the F,, the 
lint of which was described as being similar to that of 
the Afifi cotton when first introduced in 1887, gave a 
remarkable series in F,; the limits of the brown Peruvian 
type of lint were never transgressed, but within these 
bounds we obtained almost every known modification ; 
the old Afifi, modern Afifi, Ashmouni of the Fayoum, 
Upper Egypt Ashmouni, and—most remarkable of all 
—the original Jumel cotton of Mohammed Ali’s time. 
Within the limits of this one family there was plainly 
an opportunity for much research. 

The examination of the King x Charara F, was com- 
plicated by the extreme range of lint length, which ran 
from 18 to 40 mm. Many plants were confessedly judged 
as non-Kgyptian because of their shortness, and hence the 
fact that the ratio of Egyptian: non-Egyptian was 108: 
71, or almost 9:7, cannot be regarded as significant. 

Summarising this and similar evidence, it would seem 
safe to affirm that some striking feature of the lint— 
possibly the diameter—is inherited as a simple factor. 
Complications may be introduced gametically, and also by 
‘autogenous fluctuation.” Until we can define the reasons 
which cause an expert to call one sample by one name and 
another by another, our investigation must be limited to 
rule of thumb. 


* Mr. E. A. Benachi, now Minister of Agriculture for Greece, and Messrs. 
Marco Nacamuli and H. C. Thomas, of the National Bank of Egypt. 


VIII HEREDITY 149 


We have now examined the nature of the problems which 
the non-measurable characters present. The general 
trend of the evidence is to show that inheritance becomes 
more complex as the crossed parents are less and less 
closely related. The amount of labour which the author 
has been able to apply to these problems, under the 
limitations imposed by natural crossing and accidental 
circumstances, has not been enough to produce one clean 
and indisputable proof for any character. Nevertheless, 
he believes that the preceding discussion will be found by 
later workers to represent the general position of a 
complex subject. 


CHAPTER IX 
HEREDITY—II. 


ii. Quantitative Characters. 


ALL possible characters have been investigated quanti- 
tatively, by the methods described in the previous 
chapter on “ Fluctuation,” including flowering, bolling, 
and shedding. 

The same difficulties already enumerated have prevented 
conclusions from being drawn with certainty, the chief of 
these being the scanty F; data. On the other hand, 
we are no longer troubled by doubts as to the nature of 
our classification. 

Presentment of all the data, the frequency polygons, 
correlation tables, and dissected curves, is not possible 
here, but it should be understood that one or more forms 
have been bred out pure in F; to F, for every character 
where a factorial analysis is suggested. 

Height of stem.—The specific nature of the length 
of hypocotyl and first internode has already been mentioned. 
While the strains of Sultani and “ King” Upland were 
being grown for this purpose, a set of F, seedlings from 
these two parents was raised in the same site and soil. 
Data for F, were unfortunately not available. 


The plants were classified day by day, and the figures 


150 


CH. IX HEREDITY 151 


plotted from those plants only which had all germinated 
on the same day, being as exactly comparable as they 
could possibly be, show a very definite segregation of the 
two parental first-internode-lengths from one another, and 
from a central mode. Whether the segregation is simply 
in aratio of 1:2:1, or whether it is more complex, we 
cannot pretend to say. It is clear, however, that in com- 
mencing to analyse the height of our hybrids, we have 
first to take into account the internode length. 

This alone is not sufficient for us. If internode-length 
was the only factor, then the height of the Upland would 
be about half that of the Egyptian, whereas the early 
height of the former is rather greater than that of the 
latter. Again, on June 18th, in Fig. 56, the same Upland 
strain whose internodes we measured is equal in height to 
the same Sultani, both being grown side by side on the 
breeding plot. Hence the growth-rates must have been 
much the same, and the Upland merely produced more 
internodes in the same time. Comparing these heights 
with that of the F, on June 18th, we find that the 
latter is nearly twice as tall. The internodes are no 
lone so that the great height of the F, must be due to 

a greater growth-rate. 

The rate of growth, due to imperfectly known and 
constitutional causes, is thus the second factor in the height 
of the stem. 

From these typical figures for June 20th, one hundred 
days after sowing, we might declare that tallness was 
dominant over shortness, whatever the components might 
be. If we follow the height-curve on to the and of 
September (Fig. 56) we shall see that this sweeping 
assertion would also be untrue, for the growth-rate of the 
F, has slowed down, though not as much as that of the 
Upland, while the Sultani parent is still growing 
steadily. : 

Hence the third factor in height of stem is the amount 


132 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


of change in growth-rate, or—as we have formerly inter- 
preted this change—the liability to thermotoxy. 

It was expected that a fourth factor would be found 
operative in F,, &c., namely, the habit of branching, but 
all heights and growth-habits appear to be distributed 
evenly throughout all the branch-types, from plants with- 


/|Sultani 


150) f 


i La || ™ ; 
ij w 


iS 
° 
oat gee 7 
2100 = 
= 4 x 
> a“ 
iS i a 
= 7 Silas 
§ [ Eee aa King 
~ a 
*' 50 7 
June July Aug. Sept. Oct. 
Date 18 2 16 30 13 27 10 24 8 


Fic. 56.—Growrs or STEM. 


Parents F, of an Augypto-Upland cross. Means of families. 


out monopodial branches at all,* up to plants in which the 
main axis was scarcely recognisable.t 

The heights of the F, plants are therefore dependent 
on the three components first enumerated, but although 
we have described them as “ factors,’ they may be each 
the resultant of more than one factor in the Mendelian 
sense, as 1s the colour of the petal. Within the limits of 


* See Leake, H. M., (2), (3), and W.L.B. (5) (8) (15). 
+ Cf Bateson, W., in Lathyrus, 


_ 1 HEREDITY 153 


this book we cannot compress a full set of F, data, 
like the set given for fluctuation (Fig. 48), but the three 
main features are as follows :— 

A, The internode-length of the parents reappears in 
F, forming modes in the curve. 

B. The early rate of growth varies in normal plants, 


Afifi x Sultani June 20th. 1910 & 1911 


Sultani 1917 


0 
% 
| 
| 
3 
§ 
S 


oa 
ee 


I9i0 


Brother 
} Fy families 
1917 


Fic. 57.—Heicut or Stem in JUNE. 


Individual plants. 


even if we dissect the curve of “ growth-rate in June” 
into any component groups we may choose. Thus, taking 
only those plants which afterwards showed the habit of 
continuous growth, and omitting all but the normal 
seedlings, we find the growth-rate ranging symmetrically in 
thirty-five plants from 3°6 to 17°8 mm. per day. More- 
over, on plotting these growth-rates against the ultimate 
height of these plants at the beginning of October—which 
is legitimate, since their growth curves were all “con- 
tinuous ”’—we find a close correlation, with a value for “7” 


154 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


of not less than 0°622. The initial growth-rate of the 
F, plants therefore ranges at least as high as that of the 
F, and at least as low as that of either parent. (See also 
Fig. 57.) 

C. Over and above this incomprehensible factor of 
‘orowth-rate,” which needs the repetition of such experi- 
mental work as we have described under “the Indi- 
vidual” on every plant of a large F, before we can 
interpret it, we have also the change in growth-rate, 
affecting the height of the plants after the end of June, 
or earlier, which we have endeavoured to interpret in 
terms of specific lability to thermotoxy. On classifying 
the individual growth-curves in a family of 179 F, plants, 
we find that they were grouped as follows : 


Continuous growth, like Heyplen ae Sie gen 1D? 
Doubtfully continuous... aa aay 29 
Doubtfully like F, ... ... .. sts: Sider. Skee, eee Ze 
Semi-continuous, like F,. as we. 20 
Doubtfully like F,, being st semi-discontinuous ... 30 
Like American parent... 1. we ee ee 


Thus a small percentage of plants reappears in F, with 
the high thermotoxic susceptibility of the American 
Upland parent. It might be pointed out that the figures 
could be fitted toa 9:3:3:1 ratio, two pairs of allelo- 
morphs being involved, namely, presence and partial 
absence of ‘‘«-production” and of “‘z-removal”! 

There does not appear to be any necessary correlation 
between any of these factors in their distribution amongst 
individuals. A plant with a low initial growth-rate may 
have the habit of continuous growth and short internodes: 
strains of such plants have been bred out to F, and have 
remained pure. Such plants are short in the stem. 
Shorter still are those plants which have the discontinuous 
growth-habit, with short internodes and a low growth-rate. 
At the other extreme we meet plants with a high growth- 
rate, long internodes and continuous growth-habit. Con- 


IX HEREDITY 155 


sequently, it is not surprising that the curve showing the 
height of an F, at the end of the season exhibits continuous 
variation from one extreme to the other, especially since 
we have seen thatthe fluctuation in height is by no means 


so} 
25F 

20 | June 
15b 18th. 


July mY 
July on A a 
KA) 


10 
5 


July 30th. 


August 27th. 
Zo] 


Sept. 10th. yay 
x x 
Sept. 24th. ce eee 
Oct. 10th. Per” | a 
— ‘< = 


ae 8g NEE ORR wry 
ara a: =e ae 
Fluctuation (pure tall strainy Sept.24th. ..|.——™~-—._. S| y 
LA. = L 
50 100 150cm. 


Fic. 58.—Heicur or Stem in F, or Kine (0) by Caarara (x). 


Stunted and damaged plants excluded. Ledger page, like Fig. 48. 


inconsiderable in a pure strain. There are modes in this 
curve, nevertheless, and the following result shows that 
they are not due. to accident. 

The F,, the heights of which in 1909 are shown in 
Fig. 58, was used to provide an F; from some thirty of its 


156 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


members in 1910. Most of the plants chosen for this 
purpose were—for subjective reasons—short in the stem. 
Plotting the aggregate height of all the normal F; plants 
in 1910 against the same date in 1909, we see the same 
modes reappearing, in spite of the differences of soil and 
season (Fig. 58). These modes become less markedly 
coincident amongst the taller F,; plants, but the general 
result indicates that such modes are due to definite 
constitutional causes, inherent in the plants themselves. 

The form of the leaf.*—The component characters of 
leaf-form appear to be the length of the mid-rib (LZ) the 
distance from sinus to petiole (S), and the angle of the 
sinus from the petiole relatively to the mid-rib (/s). 

Two other components which we have not examined in 
detail for more than one family are, the angle made by the 
first lateral vein with the mid-rib, and the presence or 
absence of a second lateral vein and lobe. 

The three first components are concerned with the form 
of the central segment alone, but even in this respect we 
find more problems than we can solve. 

Taking the length (Z) first, we have already seen that 
it is correlated with height of stem, in some obscure 
manner. King Upland, with a mean leaf-length of 75 mm., 
crossed with Charara, the mean leaf-length of which was 
about 135 mm., gave an F, with leaves rather shorter than 
Charara, and this by selfing produced an F, which ranged 
from 70 to 195 mm., with slight indications of modal 
grouping ; most of the plants lay between the parental 
measurements (Fig. 59). This curve was dissected in 
various ways, thus, the plants with the ‘‘ continuous” 
growth-habit had larger leaves than the rest, but although 
none of these plants had extremely small leaves, yet 
moderately small leaves were found as a detached group. 
Further dissection of this group never succeeded in 


* See Leake, H. M. (1) (3). 


Iz HEREDITY 159 


producing a group of plants with leaves of identical 
length (z.e., identical within the P.£. of fluctuation). Thus 
it seems highly probable that the length of the leaf 
is inherited as a separate character, although it is distorted 


L Sultani Xx Afifi 
BE ‘ 
r Ps. 
F, A at A 
10 — 
| i . ; 
| t | T | Tv | T i T ] 
150 200 
mm 
10F King | x  Charara 
P.s 


Two Fz families 


Pies, ie | a 


a a 


“~ 


a iam Sa Uist Ue LA om a I, ea Sa ea 
50 100 150 mm. 200 


Fic, 59.—Lenetu or tHE Lear. 


ss. 
ES 
T T 


from the parental length by autogenous fluctuation. The 
same probability is suggested by correlation diagrams for 
leaf-length with height, with petal length, &c.; such 
diagrams show a distinct indication of isolated groups, 
such as we shall inspect shortly in the flower measurements. 


158 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cnap. 


The next-character “S,” or distance from petiole to 
sinus, is inherited in much the same way as LZ. We can 
eliminate the diversities in absolute size by expressing S 
in terms of Z, 7.e., plotting for the ratio S/Z. We then 
find that an Upland leaf, in which S is relatively long 
when crossed with an Egyptian in which S is relatively 
short—or, in other words, slightly and deeply dissected 
leaves—give rise in F, to a leaf very like the Egyptian, 
but with a slightly longer S. In F, we obtain the same 
modal curve, stretching to the parental extremes. Cor- 
relation diagrams for Z and Sin F, show modal grouping 
and no general correlation. In other words, the length of 
the sinus is inherited independently of the length of the 
mid-rib. Now this sinus-measurement is determined by 
the plant at a very early stage in the primordia, since we 
find freshly expanded leaves showing the same form as 
adults; hence a factorial determination is highly probable. 
It is necessary to express S in terms of ZL, on account of 
the diversities of Z. Thus, if we plot S simply, we find, 
e.g., in the King x Charara cross, that the parents are 
identical, while the F, is 60 per cent. longer. It is, of 
course, quite possible that our use of Z as the expression 
for mere size may be fallacious, but this would not affect 
the general argument for factorial inheritance of form. 

The last component of the form of the central segment 
is -s. We have formerly seen that the position of the 
sinus fluctuates along the angle-lines, so that instead of 
using S and .s we might employ 4s and cé, the latter 
being the angle made by the sinus with the mid-rib from 
the tip of the latter. 

On crossing the narrow angle of Upland with the 
wide angle of Egyptian we obtain a wide angle in F;. In 
F, we obtain the same wide and modal curve on plotting 
the angle values, with some indication of simple segregation 
of narrow angle from wide, which is probably fallacious. 

The next point to consider is the inter-relationship of 


1X HEREDITY 159 


these angles, and whether a wide ~s is necessarily linked 
with a narrow -¢ as in the Egyptian parent. The result 
of dissecting our curves in this way is very definite ; there 
is no such linking. Thus, taking the 26 plants which had 
the narrowest 4¢ in an F, of 180 individuals, we find that 
while 24 had very wide 4s, there were two with a very 
narrow <5, far removed from the rest. Conversely, taking 
out the 26 plants with the widest 4¢, we find from one to 
five possessing very wide 4s, while the rest had narrow <s. 
Thus the two angles may definitely be said to be inherited 
factorially, and the origination of new leaf-forms in F, 
need no longer be surprising. 

Flower form.—The characters studied in the flower 
were the length of the petal, style, and column, measured 
from the apex of the ovary cavity, the length of the 
filaments, and the width and length of the involucral 
bracts. The form of the corolla has not been examined; 
it ranges from an open cup to a long narrow one. 

The story of the inheritance of all the first four 
characters is much the same. In the first cross studied 
we found that by correcting for fluctuation, taking the 
petal length as the standard because it has been the same 
in both parents, our graphs for the F, composition assumed 
the 3:1 form.” “ Long was dominant over short, and all 
the extracted shorts tested bred true up to F;. Here, in 
spite of the Aigypto-American crossing, the characters 
seemed to be under the control of a single pair of factors. 
In this way we bred out the “short-style flower” 
mentioned in connection with natural crossing (Frontis- 
piece). 
~ In the King x Charara cross we found indications of 
segregation in petal length also, and it was in this con- 
nection that we developed the correlation-diagram method 
of seeking for segregation (Figs. 53 and 60). The method 
is essentially the same as the use of the slide-rule, but it 
enables us to deal with two variables, without correction. 


160 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


If long and short petals are represented by d and a, and 
the style lengths similarly by B and 8, and there is no 
mutual interaction, then we obtain 

9 Long petals with long style, AB. 

3 Long petals with short style, db. 

3 Short petals with long style, @B. 

1 Short petal with short style, ab. 

Now if the correlation of the two dimensions within any 
given flower is almost perfect, we shall obtain such a 
correlation diagram from the F, as that shown in Fig. 53 
(upper). The ab group is almost continuous with the 4B 
group, and is scarcely to be differentiated from it. The 
aB and Ab groups lie on either side of this diagonal 
compound scatter. Thus, on working out the value of 
“»” for the whole table we shall obtain quite a low 
value, whereas it is in reality a case of almost perfect 
correlation. Comparing this with the observed result 
obtained for the King and Charara F, as shown in the 
lower half of the figure, there can be no possible doubt 
that some such grouping is really present. The parents 
and the F, are marked on the diagram as A, E, and F. 
The F; data of the cross confirm this conclusion, so 
far as they go, and the probability is high in favour of 
the view that even the semi-smooth Gaussian curves of 
error shown by the length of petal, style, column, and 
filament in the F, of this cross are (Fig. 60) essentially 
nothing more than simple 3:1 curves, which have been 
deformed by fluctuation, both autogenous and ordinary. 

With regard to the form of the bract and its width there 
is nothing definite to be said. Narrow bract is dominant 
over wide, just as narrow leaf segments are dominant over 
wide segments, and narrow bolls over wide bolls. The F, 
ranges from one extreme to the other in a modal curve, 
and pure strains have been extracted, but no details are 
available by which the stages of this segregation can be 
traced. 


1X HEREDITY 161 


ase 

+ Filament. - Style. 
30F : \ 

5 20F 
25,- F 

F 15 
=} /\ 

9 10F V (7 
BE F 

at 5[- x 
L Ns 

10 Pe NN ey 


FE 1 ag a as ee ee) TT a es a ee | 

E ‘ ‘ 20 25 30 35 mm. 
5c ws. 

q if - wma 

7: . 


Petal. 


° 
oo ° 
ox ox o° ° 
T T T T T T | ee Sa fies Dames Com) a 
40 45 50 55 0 mm. 
40(- In Fy | X 12 smallest leaves 
- Column. Petal \ 0 14 largest leaves 
35F 
30F 
25-- —— Charara 


oeee- King 


TTT rs ar eer Sa es 


15 20mm. 


Fic. 60.—Form oF THE FLOWER IN AN AlGypro-UpLanp Cross. 


Width and form of the boll.—The Upland boll is 
usually wider and more nearly spherical than the Egyptian 
boll. Differences also exist within the Egyptian strains, 

M 


162 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


some approaching the long narrow boll of the Sea Island 
type. The form is expressed as — A cross of 
Upland with a mean form of 0°75 and a width of 31 mm., 
upon an Egyptian with a form of 0°58 and a width of 27 
mm., gives an F, with a form of 0°60 and a width of 32 
mm. In other words, the long narrow form is dominant 
though very much 


= Charara x| King larger than the 


5L 
t Ps, ea a long narrow parent. 
i i 4 (Figs. 61 and 62). 
The F, of such a 
F,. ~—-————_ cross ranges up to 
20} the F, width and 
E form, but includes 


mes i plants the bolls of 
5 2. 
tok y which may be as 


c narrow as 0°44 and 
BE ne 22 mm. So far as 
i mere width is con- 
"20°" 25" ~30.~-—~S 35mm. _— cerned, this might 
Fic. 61.—WiptH oF THE BOLL. well be due to auto- 
genous fluctuation, 
but the new form of the extremely narrow bolls cannot be 
attributed to this cause. As in the case of leaf-form, we 
are probably dealing with a compound inheritance, and 
the new forms are the result of recombinations of 
allelomorphs. 

A side-light on this interpretation is provided by plotting 
the correlation table of form against width in F,. While 
the general trend of the diagram indicates positive correla- 
tion between wider boll and more spherical boll, yet on 
comparing such a diagram with that from a pure strain, it 
becomes clear that the F, family is heterogeneous. 

Again, families have been raised in F, which showed no 
more fluctuation in width than the parent strain, while the 


1x HEREDITY 163 


form varied over double the range which could be attributed 
to fluctuation. 

One autogenetic factor in the width of the boll is the 
number of boll-loculi. Without attempting to correct for 
any possible modality in the diagram we found the value 
for correlation between these two characters in F, to be 
“pr” = 0°331 (+ 0:061). The explanation is presumably 
mechanical; the bolls with more loculi have more septa, 


Charara xX King 


Po ee 


iiive 
bE A [OV 


T v T T T T T T * T 


LaLa 
0-50 0-60 0-70 Width 

Length 
Fic. 62.—Form or THE Bott. 


and these occupy more space, hence the boll diameter is 
greater. 

More information on these two characters is highly 
desirable, because of their economic importance. 

The loculi of the ovary.—The inheritance of this 
meristic character is of peculiar interest, since it is not a 
character of form, but of distribution, and analogous to 
such things as the number of ray-florets in the Composite. 

A cross (Fig. 63) between an Upland with its mean at 
4°3 and an Egyptian with a mean at 3:0 produced an 
intermediate F, with the formula 4:1. In F, this family 

M 2 


164 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cnap. 


gave a range of 3:0 to 4°7, with modes at 3:2, 3°6, 4'1, 
4°4, and possibly elsewhere. In F, a 4°8 bred true to 


y Charara x | King 
F P.s = 
3:0 3-5 A10 4:5 5:0 
FE A_A 
i /\ 
aoe 
5 t-F, A 
' A 
x x 
es ive 
3 ie LE 


Afifi x Truitt 
P.s. Q Skeleton, showing new|F, forms Q 
ee 


— 


F, es Osx 


F, (two) ee 
/ 


. 
L ! bs 
i. ‘ 
5 a F4 ; %, 
q . ‘y 
. ae 4 
_: 


ar’; an, nae’, i Co 5-0 


Fics. 63 anp 64.—LocuLi oF THE OvaRyY. 


4°8, and a 3°1 bred true to 3°2. On the other hand, 3:3 
broke up into a scatter from 3°1 to 3°7, as did also a 3°6. 
A 3-9 plant appeared to breed true round a mean of 4°1, 


1x HEREDITY 165 


while a 3°8 scattered from 3°8 to 3°3. Similarly, a 4:0 
scattered from 3°9 to 3'2, and soon. On the data avail- 
able it seemed clear that the parental forms could be 
extracted and bred true, while the intermediate forms 
represented new gametic combinations which broke up in 
new ways, giving new forms. No large family having 
been raised beyond F, in this cross, we may examine 
the data from another one. 

The Afifi x Truitt cross had 2°8 and 4°5 as the parental 
values (Fig. 64). The figure 4°5 is uncertain, because there 
was every indication that the American parent was 
heterozygote in this respect. The F, had 36 loculi, and 
the F, spread from 2°9 to 4°8. Only five F; families 
were raised ; one of these was derived from a 3°3 plant, 
and its twenty-one offspring ranged from 2°9 to 3°4, thus 
resembling the Egyptian parent closely but not exactly. 
Another 3°3 behaved in the same way, and repeated this 
behaviour in Fy, Conversely, a 4°8 gave only 4°6 to 
4:9; while a 4:5 gave 4:2 to 46. The offspring of a 
4:3 form broke up into a wide scatter from 3°3 to 4:9; 
several small families of these were bred on into F,, but 
the largest and most interesting was one from a 4°5 
plant, which consisted of twenty-nine plants, ranging only 
from 4°5 to 5:0, and giving a frequency polygon with the 
same probable error as the parent. 

The inter-Egyptian cross was expected to unravel a 
portion of this tangle, but although the critical numbers 
were doubled, and the data classified to half-grades the 
result was much the same (Fig. 65). Sultani (3°20) 
crossed by Afifi (2°80) gave an F, at 3:00. The F, of 
this broke up with great symmetry over the parental 
extremes with a single mode at the F, value. The 
spread of this curve of the F, is too narrow to be the 
expression of a 1:2:1 ratio, so it is probable that at 
least two factors are involved even here. There is a slight 
indication of the possible nature of these factors, namely, 


166 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


differentiation and coalescence, but it is not worth fur- 
ther consideration until we possess the data from later 
generations. 

This Afifi x Sultani cross was made principally in the 
hope of obtaining a simple inheritance of this particular 


fr, : 
10h Afifi x =; Sultani 
°F Ps, PA t . MeL 
PA ra aN 
i. F.;. “ x 
35 
30f 
25-- x 
20F an 
C ny 
15 ae 
10-Fi3-F5. r { 
3 oe 
SS es a 
27 3-0 3:3 


Fic. 65.—Locuni oF THE Ovary. 


character. Although it has failed to give the expected 
simplicity it is still less complex than the Mgypto- 
American crosses. The graphs are most strongly 
indicative, to the unbiased mind, of the formation of a 
new character in F,, which subsequently breeds true; 
nevertheless, in the light of the other crosses, there can be 
little doubt that such is not the true interpretation. 


IX HEREDITY 167 


The weight of the seed.—The inheritance of the 
mean seed-weight is particularly interesting. In the first 
place it fluctuates more than any other character, except- 
ing the height, and it further shows clear evidence of 
autogenous fluctuation. 

The first cross in which this character was carefully 
examined was Afifi x Truitt (Fig. 66), where the mean 
seed weights were.0°105 g. and0°135 g. The seed weight 
in F, was 0165 9. In F, the weights ranged from 0°08 
to 0°175 g., with two marked modes at 0°095 and 0°115. 
The form of this F, graph suggested that light seed was 


P.g. Pa F, 


10F 


100 =) 150 
Fic. 66.—MeEaAn Seep-Weicur. 


Afifi x Truitt, showing extraction of small seed in F;. 


segregating from heavy seed, and on testing this by breed- 
ing on, we found no reason to modify this conclusion ; 
thus, a plant with seed weighing 0°100 regressed slightly 
in F, to amean of 0090, with a scatter from 0°070 to 
0°110, and no higher probable error than the parent strain ; 
and F, raised from a 0°090 plant of these gave the same 
result, ranging from 0°:065 to 0:110. ‘he plants of the 
F, had been extremely diversified in most other characters, 
such as height, while the F, was almost a pure strain. 

Whether the segregation was simple or compound, it 
was clear that the size of the seed—expressed by us as 
weight—was an inherited characteristic. 

In another cross, namely Charara x King (Fig. 68), the 
matter became more interesting, and the inheritance 


168 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


obviously complex. The seed weights of the two parents 
were substantially the same, being 0°085 for the American, 
and 0°095 for the Egyptian. The weight of the F, seed 
was 0°145. Thus a very marked “ intensification” had 
taken place, and the problem of finding the cause was set 
to the author. The seed weight in F, gave an unexpected 
frequency polygon; instead of a 3:1 form we obtained a 
modal curve, otherwise fairly symmetrical, which ranged 
from 0°055 to 0°170; the principal modes were situated 
at 0°085, 0°105, 0°120, and 0°140. 

Before discussing this graph any further we may note 
that the F, data were of the same nature as those described 
under the preceding character; the parental small seed 
was extracted and bred true, while larger seeds sometimes 
threw small ones in a way which suggested a 3: 1 ratio, or 
less commonly bred true. In the latter case a new 
character, not found in either parent, had been “ fixed.” 
In the ordinary Mendelian characters such phenomena are 
usually due to the meeting of cryptomeres, but we shall 
see that our cryptomeres in this case are even less cryptic 
than Miss Wheldale’s enzymes in Antirrhinum. 

The attempt to dissect the F, graph into its components 
led to the plotting of numerous correlation tables, and to 
the preparation of ‘dissected graphs” (Fig. 69). In the 
latter method, which is more rapid than the former, we 
take plants possessing some character in common, such as 
a very large boll, and mark off their position on the graph 
of the whole family. The mean of the special group, as 
compared with the general mean, serves to indicate any 
displacement, while the form of the “ dissection ” is usually 
less complicated than that of the general graph. On 
dissecting in this way for the fifteen plants which had the 
greatest boll-width of the whole 181 F, individuals, the 
mean seed-weight was raised by 00105 g.; moreover, 
though these large-boll plants constituted the greater part 
of the 0°140 mode, yet four of them were found in the 0°085 


IX HEREDITY 


» Sultani x Afifi 
10 a es 
5 , 
r Ps, ' 
i 
Fy. 
20} 
15 EE 
10F ov 
t 
- 1 
5 Fo. Fz - 
i T nee i | cf a | qT T aN T q 
0-050 0-100 0-150 gram 
Fic. 67.—Mxran Seep Weicut in Inrer-Ecyrrian Cross, 
; King x Charara 
BE P.s a ae 
F. L 
20 
15 a | 
A Pr \ re 
5 = F, 
L T T T T ae | T T T T T T T TT T T | Fn aa | 
0-050 0-100 0-150 gram 


Fic, 68,—Mzan Sexp-Weicut 1n ‘Ecypro-Urtanp Cross, 


170 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


mode. This result indicated correlation of big-boll and 
big-seed, with segregation of big seed from small within 
the group. Similarly, on dissecting for the twenty-four 
smallest bolls, the modes were at 0°105 and 0°075. On 
plotting the correlation diagram it was found to give 
a value for “7” of about 0°3, but this diagram was 
distinctly modal, the points being grouped, so that the 
true value of “7” was probably very much higher. 

Similar dissections were made in respect of almost every 
character available. In no case did the groups show 
uniform seed weight within the error of fluctuation. 
Either the new group was evenly distributed over the 
graph, there being no correlation, or else it moved to one 
side. In the latter case, the group always assumed the 
3:1 form. The most interesting of these for comparison 
with the big-boll dissection was the dissection for “ dis- 
continuous habit of growth”; the twenty plants which 
most resemble the Upland parent in this respect did not 
exceed 0°130, and formed two modes, one on and behind 
0085, the other on 0°105. Again, though classification 
according to habit of branching showed no marked shift- 
ing of the group-centre, yet the ‘“‘ unbranched” plants 
filled up the 0°120 mode, while “freely branched” 
occupied the mode at 0°140 (Fig. 69). 

Two general conclusions result from this analysis. 
Firstly, that the modes in the F, curve are genuine, and 
largely due to autogenous fluctuation. 

Secondly, that the F, curve consists of superposed 
curves having the 3:1 form, but mutually obscurant until 
groups of comparable individuals are taken. 

Thus we have shown that light seed is segregating from 
heavy seed in F,, probably as a simple pair of allelo- 
morphs, just as in the Afifi x Truitt series. The only 
serious weakness of this view lies in the fact that both 
the parents were light-seeded! The Upland parent, how- 
ever, bore these light seeds inside a boll of 32 mm. 


Ix IX HEREDITY 
Fifteen 
‘ F Largest Bolls PI S\ \ ee 
100 S50 V V V/ 
5E 
FE °° 
r 3 2 ° ° ° 5 . ° Kn 
E Thirteen 
Y Largest Leaves a La \ \\ ran 
10l-see V V 
BE V 
a °° oo 
Ss 2 © oo°o oOo 9° TaN 
—+— Total of all F, 
\ families 
|. Shedding ; : 
r less than 50% / \ A! 
fF 900 / VN ra 
rE = V ; 
BE - 
vs 
F AA A 
—-—- Unbranched 
aecreen Branched 
10F a L\ 
AV 
5 C entity / 3 n\/ 
= aos dane “sf. wa sv 
~ Ae Ph 
® — a > Tl aN T 
0-050 0-100 0-150 grams. 


The F, curve of Fig. 68, 


Fic. 69.—Dissection or Mean Seep-Weicut 1n F,. 


characters, 


dissected in respect of four correlated 


171 


172 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT  cuap. 


diameter, while the Egyptian boll was only 27 mm. in 
diameter. On crossing the two strains we effectively 
placed the Egyptian seed inside a boll whose cubic 
capacity had been doubled, and an increase in seed-size 
followed. Thus we may regard the Egyptian seed as 
being constitutionally large, and dominant over the 
genuinely small Upland seed. At gametogenesis in F,, 
the two seed-weight allelomorphs separate from one 
another, and the 3:1 ratio appears in F, if we clear 
away the lumber brought in by autogenous fluctuation. 
We have discussed this masking of the difference in 
seed-weight, and the development of the difference under 
equal opportunities, in terms of boll-width alone for 
convenience, though other factors are also involved. The 
displacement of the means for such dissected graphs, 
when compared with the probable error of a pure strain, 
which is obviously too stringent a test for these hetero- 
geneous groups, gave significant deviations in respect of 
“ discontinuous growth” ; a slight but significant deviation 
with respect to branching ; a slight indication of connec- 
tion between extensive shedding and heavy seed, which 
is probably indirect, since “‘ discontinuous growth” sheds 
less than the other types; and a very marked relation 
between wide or narrow boll and heavy or light seed 
respectively. In the last case the figures were as follows :— 


36 Widest bolls. Mean seed-weight + 9°4% (P.E. x 3:2 
3-2 


4:3%) 
24 Narrowest bolls. 4 ie -13:2% (PE. x 5°37) 


= 53% 
The simple cross of Sultani x Afifi showed dominance 
of heavy seed over light in F, (Fig. 67), and although 
the difference between the two parents was very small, 
yet some indication of segregation is shown. This takes 
the form of two modes in the F, curve, which appear in 
both the brother families; since the mean weights are 
computed, and hence do not suffer from any subjective 


error, this coincidence is probably significant, and due to 


1X HEREDITY 173 


the superposition of a small-seed mode on the flank of a 
large-seed mode. 

Summarising the evidence, it would seem that beneath 
all the complexity involved by fluctuation, by autogenous 
fluctuation and by correlation, there existed in all these 
hybrids a straightforward segregation of seed-size, con- 
trolled by a single allelomorphic pair of factors.in every 
case. 

The mean maximum length of the lint.—The 
inheritance of this character has been curiously similar 
to that of seed-weight, but the evidence is not so clear. 
The Afifi x Truitt cross showed segregation which was 
ostensibly simple, long being dominant over short; the 
Charara x King cross gave dominance of length in F,, 
with subsequent modal composition in F,. Sultani x 
Afifi again gave dominance of length, and the F, curve 
was almost symmetrical between the parental extremes 
(Fig. 70). 

Subsequent generations have shown that pure parental 
length can be extracted, while new intermediate lengths 
may also breed true. 

Dissection of the F, revealed a similar series of 
phenomena to those shown by seed-weight. In this case, 
the most definite result was obtained by grouping to seed- 
weight; the 28 largest seed-weights had a mean lint- 
length which was 5:9 per cent. above the general mean, 
with modes at 264 and 32 mm., the form of the dis- 
section being that of the 3:1 type (Fig. 70). Conversely, 
the 27 smallest seed-weights were 59 per cent. below 
the mean general lint-length, with modes at 21 and 
27 mm. . 

It thus seems highly probable that lint-length is also 
inherited simply, in spite of the seeming complication 
of the Charara x King second generation. 

Miscellaneous.—All the characteristics mentioned in 
the chapter on Fluctuation have been made the subject of 


174 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cuap. 


Afifi | x Sultani 
15 


10h 


20-F 


Treryt 


10 


oa 
ae 


bas Sy King x] Charara 


5 
rP.s a 


a 


Tiventy-eight 
Largest Seeds 


= 
a 
a 


ar 
a 


Fic. 70.--Mgean Maximum Lint-Lenora. 


IX HEREDITY 145 


statistical records in the ordinary course of routine 
observations. Thus we possess the curves for growth, 
flowering, bolling, and shedding for almost every indi- 
vidual studied. Data for weight of lint per seed, and for 
ginning out-turn are also to hand, but the majority of 
these records are of more value as supplementary sources 
of information in physiology than from the standpoint 
of Genetics. At the same time, they are frequently of 
interest as showing the commercial resultant of those 
conflicting gametic forces whose lines we have endeavoured 
to trace. 


SECTION IV 


CHAPTER X 
ECONOMICS * 


Wiruin the limits of this volume we can do no more than 
glance at the many matters of economic interest to which 
those researches are linked. Their most direct and im- 
mediate application has been found in the Sub-Soil Water 
controversy, from which many of the inquiries originated. 
No attempt has here been made to emphasise the economic 
importance of root asphyxiation and restriction, but the 
text and diagrams should show that a deep water-table 
is essential, and that a rise of the water table to the roots 
is deadly in July, prejudicial in September, and almost 
harmless in December. For several years the yield per 
acre in Egypt had been lessening (Fig 71), and many 
causes * had been invoked to account for it, but the matter 
was obscure until Mr. J. R. Gibson, assisted by M. 
Audebeau, showed that the level of the water-table had 
risen on the State Domains, and pointed out the pro- 
bability that such a rise, produced by improvements in the 
system of irrigation, might suffice as a general cause. ” 
Mr. Gibson’s death deprived the author of his collaboration 


* See Todd, J. A., for discussion of the purely economic problems of 
cotton in Egypt and Lancashire. 
176 


CH. X ECONOMICS ee 


in developing the biological side of this hypothesis, which 
—after three years of animated discussion ' 1% 1 % 2 
has now become a factor in the administration of Egypt.* 

The original hypothesis is still unproven, and must so 
remain, in the absence of extensive records to show the 
water-levels of past years, but so strong a case has been 


‘ 
’ 
, 


, ra % a 


- 1,500,000 


a 


Area in------- 
Feddans (acres) 


ol 


= 
° 
9 
2 
° 
° 
° 


- 


ice) 


Yield per Feddan in Kantars (100 /bs. lint.) 


tO 


Area and Yield of the 
Egyptian Cotton| Crop 


1895 - IQII 


Year 1895 1900 1905 1910 
Fic, 71.—AREA AND YIELD oF THE Eayrtran Corron Crop, 1895-1911. 


made out for the presumption t that, when taken in con- 
junction with the physiological evidence summarised in 
the present volume, the proof may be regarded as exhaus- 
tive. The preliminary solution of one of the neatest 
problems ever set to agricultural science has thus been 


* Report of Cotton Commission, 1910; Reports of H.M. Agent and 
Consul-General on Egypt and the Sudan (Egypt No. 1) 1910, 1911, and 1912. 
} Ferrar, H. T. ; Lucas, A ; Audebeau, C. 


N 


178 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cnap. 


achieved, on a crop which is worth twenty to thirty 
millions of pounds per annum. 

Concurrently with the depreciation of yield, there had 
also been a depreciation of quality in the chief variety 
grown.” * This latter trouble was partly due to the 
same cause, but chiefly to varietal “ deterioration.” 

The coincidence was extremely unfortunate, for the 
short crops led to inflated prices,* which were intolerable 
with a degrading quality.; the consumers, driven to 
experiment with inferior cottons, succeeded beyond all 
expectation in the substitution of long-staple Upland, and 
even of ordinary Upland, for Egyptian cotton. The 
typical Egyptian cotton has thus lost the monopoly which 
it formerly enjoyed. 

The remedies for these two troubles are now being 
applied,t to wit, drainage and restricted irrigation in the 
first case, together with the supply of better seed in the 
second. With regard to seed-supply we have seen that 
the problem is essentially the avoidance of natural crossing, 
since “deterioration” must ensue if a single foreign 
pollen-grain enters the pedigree. By cultivating pure 
lines in bee-proof cages, propagating from these in 
isolated sites, or in plots protected by related populations, 
and by renewing continually the seed-supply of any 
strain in this way from the laboratory through seed-farms, 
the varieties of the future will be proof against “ deteriora- 
tion,” unless mutation takes place. It cannot be too 
strongly insisted upon, that any scheme for the intro- 
duction of new cottons is doomed to ultimate failure unless 
continual replacement of contaminated stocks is taking 
place every year from the original pure strain.* ” 

The demands of Egyptian cotton upon the cotton- 
breeder,” ” apart from this question of purifying and 


* Todd, J. A. ; 
+ Lord Kitchener’s Report on Egypt and the Sudan, 1912. 


x ECONOMICS 179 


distributing the existing varieties, have sunk of late years 
into insignificance, through contrast with the urgent call 
for physiological information. Still, they are by no means 
trivial, and once stability is restored to the supply of 
Egyptian cotton, there will be room for much improve- 
ment in detail. The chief interest of the data on 
genetics ®* 1° relates to the extension of cotton cultiva- 
tion into fresh countries and climates. ‘The reader will 
probably concede, whatever may be the soundness of 
the interpretations given, that there is no doubt as to 
the formal nature of the inheritance of various characters 
in cotton crosses, even where such inheritance appears 
most dependent on simple chance. Such characteristics 
as yielding-capacity, earliness of maturity, climatic 
suitability, and others of agricultural importance, are 
the outcome of complex and interacting combinations 
of allelomorphs, and must in no way” ** be con- 
sidered as simple things; but sufficient time and 
research will ultimately deduce the laws of their trans- 
mission, now that the said research has been placed on 
a precise basis. The outcome of such deductions must be 
that the colonial agriculturist of the near future will no 
longer carry a bag of seed, searching for a district in 
which it will grow to the consumer’s liking, but will choose 
his district first, and then manufacture a cotton plant to 
suit it. A further impetus towards the precise study of 
genetics will be given by the specialisation of manufactur- 
ing processes, demanding more various types of raw 
material, each suited to special purpuses, and therefore 
worked up with greater. economy. The aeroplane is 
already beginning to affect the Egyptian fellah. 

An important advantage of seed-supply projects lies in 
their simplicity from the viewpoint of the native cultivator, 
who is usually prejudiced and frequently unskilled. A 
change in the variety of cotton supplied to him causes no 
change in his habits or methods, and interferes less with 

N 2 


180 THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT cx. x 


his personal freedom than any other manifestation of the 
‘march of progress.” 

With regard to the general cultivation of cotton, 
these researches have thrown into prominence the im- 
mense importance of the root-system, whereof—in a 
limited sense—the aérial portions are only the visible 
expression.” 17%55°° Tt seems probable that a great 
deal of botanical research in the coming twenty years will 
be subterranean. Researches have also cleared up the 
causes of seed-failure, have obtained some general ex- 
pressions for, the effect of environment on development, 
and by means of a system of records, which can be kept 
with no more trouble than meteorologists’ observations, 
they have thrown light on the causes of variation in crops 
from year to year, and from place to place, in the form 
of certain curves of flowering, bolling, and growth, which 
have a precise value. 

The designation of lines upon which to drive our wedges 
still further into the mass of available material is almost 
impossible, since the most valuable results are usually 
obtained by following out a side line, which in its turn has 
been detected through the accidental direction of attention 
to a commonplace phenomenon. Knowledge of the 
changes in water-content of various layers of soil can be 
applied directly to irrigation practice, study of the growth 
processes in the fruit will demonstrate the causes of 
fluctuation in the grade of the commercial product, and 
any information about the infectivity of foreign pollen 
may reveal the way by which the contamination of 
varieties can be eliminated. Lastly, it should be borne in 
mind that most of these researches are based on evidence 
collected at the apex of the Egyptian Delta, so that there 
is a long field of operations in which our present results 
may be re-examined, stretching from the Mediterranean 
into the heart of the Sudan. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Allard, H. A. 

1. “Notes on Cotton-Breeding in N. Georgia.” Amer. Breeders’ 
Assoc. Rep., 1909. 

2. “Preliminary Observations concerning Natural Crossing in 
Cotton.” Amer. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep., 1910. 

Arminjou, P. ‘Question du Coton en Egypte.” Extrait de la Revwe 
Politique et Parlementaire, September, 1909. 

Atkinson, G. F. ‘Some Diseases of Cotton.” Alabama Exp. Sta., 
Bull. 41, 1892. 

Audebeau, Bey C. Rapports présenté a la Commission des Domaines 
de l’Etat Egyptien. “‘ Experiences relatives 4 l’influence de la 
nappe souterraine sur des cultures de coton.” Cairo, 1909, 
et. seq. 

Baines, Edward. ‘History of the Cotton Manufacture.” London, 
1834. 

Baker, Sir Samuel. ‘“ Albert Nyanza.” London, 1866, p. 276, 
etc. ; also “ Ismailia.” 

Balfour, A. See Hutton. 

Balls, W. Lawrence. 

1. “The Sexuality of Cotton.” Year Book Khed. Agric. Soc. 
(K. A. 8.), 1905. 

2. “The Physiology of a Simple Parasite. I.” Year Book 
K, A. S., 1905. 

3. “Fungoid Diseases of Egyptian Crops.” eat Book of Egyptian 
Agriculture. Cairo, 1911. 

4, “ Preliminary Note on Mendel’s Law in Cotton.” Jour. Agric. 
Sez., II, 2, 1907. 

5. “Studies of Egyptian Cotton.” Year Book K. A. 8., 1906. 

6. “The Physiology of a Simple Parasite; II., Field Notes ; IIL. 
Preventive Measures.” Year Book K. A. S., 1906. 

x 7. “Projects for the Improvement of Egyptian Cotton.” Cairo 
Scientific Journal. February, 1908. 

8. “Mendelian Studies of Egyptian Cotton.” Journ. Agric. Sci, 
II 4, 1908. 


182 BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Balls, W. Lawrence (cont.) 
9. “Temperature and Growth,” being Part IV of “Studies of a 
Simple Parasite.” Annals of Botany, XXII, 1908, p. 557. 

10. “ Natural Crossing in Cotton.” British Association, Dublin, 
1908. 

11. “The Cotton Crop of Egypt.” Caro Sci. Jour., 22, 1908. 

12. “Some Cytological Aspects of Cotton Breeding.” American 
Breeders’ Assoc. .lnn. Rep., January, 1909. 

13. “Cotton Investigations in 1908.” Cairo Sci. Jour., February, 
1909. 

14. ‘“ Botanical Notes on Cotton.” Cairo, Sci. Jour., June, 1909. 

15. “Studies of Egyptian Cotton.” Year Book K. A. 8, 1909, 
pp. 180. (Mendelian Cotton Breeding; Experimental Results 
from a Single Cross ; The Cotton Crop of Egypt.) 

16. “ A Summary of present information concerning the effect of 
Sub-soil Water on the Cotton Crop.” Supplement Year Book 
K. A. S., 1909. 

17. “The Prospects of the Egyptian Cotton Crop.” Cairo Sci. 
Jour., December, 1909. 

18. “The Future Prospects of Egyptian Cotton.” JJanchester 
Guardian, Comm. Suppl., December, 1909. Reprinted as No. 
39 of British Cotton-growing Association. 

19. “Some Complications in Mendelian Cotton-breeding.”  Budl. 
de UV Inst. Egyptien, 1910, p. 120. 

+20. “Mendelian Inheritance in Hybrids of Upland and Egyptian 
Cotton.” American Breeders’ Assoc., Ann. Rep., Jan., 1910. 

21. “A Problem in Biometrical Statistics.” Cairo Sci. Jour., 
April, 1910. 

22. “ Notes on Publications relating to Cotton.” Cairo Sci. Jour., 
May, 1910. 

23. “The Effect of Seed-Weight on the Field Germination of 
Cotton Seed.” Cairo Sei. Jour., 1910. 

24. “The Causes affecting the Egyptian Cotton Crop.” Report of 
Brussels International Conference on Tropical Agriculture. 1910. 

x 25. “The Application of Mendel’s Law to Cotton-breeding.” Report 
of Brussels International Conferenceon Tropical Agriculture, 1910. 

+26. “The Physiology of the Cotton Plant.” Cazro Sci. Jour., 
July, 1910. 

27. “Investigations of Water-logging.” Manchester Guardian, 
October 20th, 1910. 

28. “The Mechanism of Nuclear Division.” Annals of Botany, 
October, 1910. 

29. “Cotton Investigations in 1909 and 1910.” Cairo Set. Jour., 
September, 1911. 

30. ‘The Inheritance of Measurable Characters in reputed Species- 
Hybrids of Cotton.” Report of 4th International Conference 
on Genetics. Paris, 1911. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 183 


Balls, W. Lawrence (cont.). 

31. “The Stomatograph.” Proc. Roy. Soc, 1912. (Also 
Nature, August 10th, 1911.) 

32. “The Introduction of New Cottons.” Agric. Jour, Egypt, 
1912. (Also in Annexe Documentaire to Rep. Eg. Gov. 
Cotton Commission 1910, and Yearly Reports of Khed. 
Agric. Soc.) 

Bateson, W. ‘‘ Mendel’s Principles of Heredity.” Cambs., 1910, 
&e., &e. 

Bateson, Saunders, and Punnet. Reports of the Evolution Committee 
of the Royal Society. 

Baur, Erwin. “ EHinfuhrung in die Experimentelle Vererbungslehre.” 
Berlin, 1911. 

Beaman, A. H. ‘“ Egypt Revisited” XI. “ Agriculture and Cotton 
Growing” Sept. 16, 1913. XII. ‘“‘ Improvement of Cotton Cultiva. 
tion,” Sept. 17, 1910. Zhe Standard, London. 

Bennett, R. L. ‘A Method of Breeding Early Cotton to Escape 
Boll-Weevil Damage.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Farmers’ Bull., 3.4, 
Feb, 1908. 

Biffen, R.H. “ Mendel’s Laws of Inheritance and Wheat Breeding.” 
Jowr. Agric. Ser. I. 1. 

Blackman, F. F. ‘‘Optimaand Limiting Factors.” Ann. Bot., 1905. 

Blackman, F. F. and Matthaei, G.L.C. “A Quantitative Study of 
Carbon Dioxide Assimilation and Leaf Temperature in Natural 
Tilumination.” Proc. Roy. Soc., B. 76, 1905. : 

Bowman, F. H. ‘Structure of the Cotton Fibre.” Manchester, 
1881. Also London, 1908. 

Bowring, Sir J.“ Report on Egypt and Candia.” London, 1840. 

Brodie, D. A. ‘Building up a run-down cotton plantation.” U.S. 
Dept. Ag., Farmers’ Bulletin, 1908. 


Brownlee, J. “The Inheritance of Complex Growth forms such as 
Stature on Mendel’s Theory.” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., May, 
1910. 


Burkill, I. H. ‘Pollination of Cotton in Behar.” Jour. and Proc. 
Roy. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, N.S. III. 7, 1907. 
“Gossypium obtusifolium. Roxb.” Mem. Dep. Ag., India, I. 4. 
(Botanical). 
Burns, G. ‘Soil Moisture.” K.A.S. Year Book, 1905. 
Cannon, W. A. ‘“‘Spermatogenesis in Hybrid Cotton.” Bull. Torrey 
Club, 1900. 
Clot, Bey. ‘ Apercu sur l’Egypte.” Brussels, 1840, p. 260. 
Clouston, D. “ Artificial Fertilizers for Cotton in Central Provinces.” 
Ag. Jowr. Ind., II. 2, 1907, p. 116. 
“ Artificial Fertilizers for Cotton in Central Provinces and Behar.” 
Ag. Jour. Ind., IIT. 3, p. 245. 
Commission, the, of the Khed. Agric. Soc., on Cotton, 1908. K.A.8. 
Year Book, 1909. 


184 BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Commission, the, of the Egyptian Government, on Cotton, 1910, 
Official Report, Cairo, 1910. 

Connell, E. T. ‘ Cotton Gins. How to erect and work them.” Imp. 
Dept. Ag., West Indies. 

Cook, O. F. McLachlan, A., and Meade, R.M. “A study of 
Diversity in Egyptian Cotton.” U.S. Dept. Ag. Bur. Pl. 
Industry. Bull. 156. July 24, 1909. 

Cook, O. F. 

1. “Reappearance of a primitive character in Cotton Hybrid.” 
U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Industry. Cire. 18, Nov., 1908. 

2. Local Adjustment of Cotton Varieties.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. 
Pl. Ind. Bull. 159. Sept. 28, 1909. 

3. “ Origin of the Hindi Cotton.” U.S. Dept., Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind. 
Bull. 42. Dec. 11, 1909. 

4. “ Weevil-resisting Adaptations of the Cotton Plant.” U.S. Dept. 
Ag. Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull. 88. Jan. 13, 1906. 

5. “Suppressed and intensified characters in Cotton hybrids.” 
U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind. Bull. 147. April 7, 1909. 

6. “Danger in judging Cotton Varieties by Lint percentages.” 
U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind. Cire. 11. Aug. 25, 1908. 

7. “Cotton Culture in Guatemala.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Year 
Book, 1904. 

Craig, J. I. 

See also Dowson and Craig. 

1. “Statistics of the Yield of Cotton.” (Extrait de “? Egypte 
Contemporaine,” T. IL. p. 587). 

2. “Notes on Cotton Statistics in Egypt.” (Extrait de “l’Egypte 
Contemporaine,” T. II., p. 166). 

Darwin, Francis. 

1. “ Observations on Stomata.” Trans. Roy. Soc., B. 190, p. 531 
(1898). 

2. “A self-recording method applied to the movements of 
Stomata.” Bot. Gaz. 37, p. 81 (1904). 

Darwin, Francis, and Pertz, D. F. M. “On a new method of 
Estimating the aperture of Stomata.” Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 84 
(1911). 

Delacroix, G. “Sur la Maladie du Cotonnier en Egypte.” (Extrait 
de “Tl’ Agriculture Pratique des pays chauds.”) 

Delile, A. R: in “ Description de ’Egypte.” Hist. Nat. IL, p. 69. 

Dixon, A. A. “Egyptian Cotton Prospects.” 7th International 
Cotton Congress, Brussels, 1910. 

Dorsey, Clarence, W. 

1. “ Alkali Soils of the United States.” ‘A Review of Literature 
and Summary of present information.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. 
Soils. Bull. 35, 1906. 

2. “Reclamation of Alkali Soils at Billings, Montana.” U.S. 
Dept. Ag., Bur. Soils. Bull. 44. July 6th, 1907. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 185 


Dowson, E. M. and Craig, J. I. 

1. “Collection of Statistics on the Areas planted in Cotton in 
1909.” Survey Dept., Egypt. 1910, Cairo. 

2. “Collection of Statistics on the Areas planted in Cotton in 
1910.” Survey Dept., Egypt. 

Dunstan, Wyndham, Prof. ‘“ Report on the present position of 
cotton cultivation.” (Presented to the Inter. Con. Trop. Ag., 
Brussels, May, 1910.) International Association of Tropical 
Agriculture and Colonial Development. 

Egyptian Government, the; Official Reports, various, especially 
Ministry of Public Works. 

Elliot, C. G. “ Drainage of Farmlands.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Farmers’ 
Bull. 187, 1904. 

Evans, W. H. and others. ‘‘ The Cotton Plant.” Washington, 1895. 

Ferrar, H. T. 

1. “Notes on Subsoil-water in Egypt.” Cwiro Sei. Jour., 
Dec., 1909. 

2. “ Preliminary Note on the Subsoil-water in Lower Egypt, and 
its bearing on the reported deterioration of the Cotton Crop.” 
Presented to the Cotton Commission. Survey Dept. Cairo, 
1910. 

3. “Sub-Soil Water in Upper Egypt.” Survey Dept. Report. 
Egyptian Govt., 1910. 

4. “On the creation of an Artificial Water-table in Egypt.” 
Cairo Sci. Jour., 1910, p. 153. 

Fletcher, F. 

1. “The Bombay Cottons.” Dept. Ag. Bombay. Bull. 29, 1907. 

2, “The origin of the Egyptian Cotton.” Cairo Sei. Jour. IT. 
26, Nov., 1908. 

3. “Cottons of the World.” Review on Sir G. Watt's. Mature, 
Jan. 16th, 1908. 

4. “The Improvement of the Cottons of the Bombay Presidency.” 
Ag. Jour. Ind. I. 4, Oct., 1906. 

Foaden, G. P. 

1. “Some impressions of a visit to the Cotton-growing States of 
America.” Jour. Khed. Ag. Soc. V. 4, 1903. 

2. “Notes on Egyptian Agriculture.” U.S. Dept. Ag. Bur. Pl. 
Ind. Bull. 62. July 9, 1904. 

3. “Cotton Cultivation in Egypt.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Off. of Exp. 
Sta. Bull. 42. 

4. “The Selection of Cotton Seed.” K. A. 8. Year Book, 1905. 

5. “The Cotton-producing Countries of the World.” Bull, 
Khed. Ag. Soc., 1906. 

6. “Farm Crops: Cotton.” eat Book of Egyptian Agriculture, 
II. pp. 348-423. 

Foster, E. W. P. “The Drainage of the Delta of Egypt.” Folkestone, 
1910 


186 BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Fyson, P. F. “Some experiments in the Hybridising of Indian 
Cottons.” fem. Dept. Ag. Ind. Bot. Ser. II. 6, p. 1. 

Gammie, G. H. 

1. “The Indian Cottons.” Mem. Dept. Ag. in Ind. Bot. Ser. IT. 
2, 1907. 

2. “Cultivation of Cotton in India.” Ag. Jour. Ind. IIT. 2, p. 164. 

3. “Work done towards improvement of cotton in Bombay 
Presidency.” Ag. Jour. Jnd. IIT. 2, p. 135. 

Gaskin, L. E. P. “Cotton Cultivation and Trade in Central Provinces 
and Behar.” Ag. Jour. Ind. II. 2, p. 171, 1907. 

Girard, P. 8.; in the “Description de Egypte, Etat Moderne.” ii., 
p-. 542, Paris, 1800. 

Gorst, Sir Eldon. “ Agriculture; Cotton Crop.” Report on Egypt 
and the Sudan. 1910. 

Gregory, R. P. 

1. “Note on the Histology of the giant and ordinary forms of 
Primula Sinensis.” Proc. Cambs. Phil. Soc. XV., part 3. 

2. ‘Experiments with Primula Sinensis,” p. 78. ‘‘ Heterostylism.” 
Jour. Genetics, I. 2. 

Hall, A. D., and Mercer, W.B.—See Mercer. 

Hannan, W.I. ‘The Textile Fibres of Commerce.” Griffin, London, 
1902, p. 79 et seg. 

Hayman, J. M. “Commencement of Experiments on natural 
crossing.” Rep. Cawnpore Ag. Sta., 1905-06. 

Henry, Yves. ‘‘ Détermination de la valeur commerciale des fibres de 
Coton.” (Extrait de VAgriculture pratique des pays chauds.) 
Bull. du Jardin Colonial et des Jardins d’essai des Colonies. 

Holroyd.—See Bowring, Appendix E. 

Howard, A. “Cotton in India.” Reprint from “ Report of the 
Indian Board of Scientific Advice.” 1908. 

Howard, A., and Howard, G. L. C. “Some new Varieties of Hibiscus.” 
Mem. Dept. Ag. India, IV. 2, Bot. Ser. 

Hughes, F. 

1. “The Occurrence of Sodium Salts in Egypt.” K A. 8. Year 
Book, 1905, p. 145. 

2. “ Notes on Egyptian and Sudan Soils.” K. A.S. Year Book, 1906. 

3. “The Manurial Trials on Cotton.” K. A. S. Year Book, 1909, 
p. 159. 

Hutton, J. A. “The Cotton Crisis.” Brit. Assoc., Cambs., 1904. 
Intro. by A. J. Balfour. 

Johannsen, W. ‘‘ Does Hybridization increase fluctuating Variability ?” 
Hybrid. Conf. Rep., 1906. 

Kearney, T. H., and Peterson, W. A. 

1. “ Egyptian Cotton in the 8.W. United States.” U.S. Dept. Ag., 
Bur. Pl. Ind., Bu?l. 128. 

2. “Experiments with Egyptian Cotton in 1908.” (In Arizona.) 
U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind., Circ. 29, 1909. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 187 


Knapp, Seaman A. “Cotton, the Greatest of Cash Crops.” U.S. 
Dept. Ag., Office Sec., Cure. 32, 1910. 

Kiiyper, J. ‘Ueber das Einfluss der Temperatur auf die Atmung 
der héheren Pflanzen.” ec. Travaux Bot. Néerlandais, VII, 
1910. 

Lamb, P. H. ‘“‘ Report on Cotton in Uganda.” Ag. Dept., Kampala, 
Uganda, 1910. 

Leake, H. Martin. 

1 “Studies in the Experimental Breeding of the Indian Cottons ; 
an introductory note.” Jour. and Proc. Roy. Asiat. Soc., Bengal, 
VI. 1, 1908. 

2. “On Buds and Branching.” (‘‘Studies in the Experimental 
Breeding of Indian Cotton; an introductory note. Part 2.”) 
Jour. and Proc. Roy. Asiat. Soc., Bengal, Vol. V., 1909. 

3. ‘Studies of Indian Cotton.” Jour. Genetics, Sept., 1911. 

4. “Notes on the incidence and effect of Sterility and Cross- 
fertilization in the Indian Cottons.” dfem. Dept. Agric. Ind., 
Bot. Ser., IV. 3, 1912. 

Leather, W. J. 

1. “The Composition of the Oil Seeds in India.” Cotton, p. 28. 
Mem. Dep. Ag. India, Chem. Ser. I. 2, Cross ref. to Ag. Ledg. 
9, 1903. 

2. “Water Requirements of Crops in India.” Mem. Dep. Ag. 
India, Chem. Ser. I. 8, Jan., 1910. 

Lecomte, H. ‘Le Coton en Egypte: Culture, Préparation, Expor- 
tation.” Rapport adressé a M. le Gouverneur du Senegal sur 
une mission en Egypte. 

Legrand, F. “Les Fluctuations de Prix et les Crises de 1907 et 1908 
en Egypte.” Nancy, 1909. 

Lloyd, F. E. “The Physiology of Stomata.” Carnegie Institution, 
1908. 

de Lotbiniére, Major H. G. J. “ Waterlogging of the Nile Valley.” 
Cairo Sct. Jour., 1910, p. 221. 

Lucas, H. 

1. ‘Fluctuations of Water Level in some Wells in Cairo.” Survey 
Notes, 1907. 

2, “The Underground Water in Cairo.” Cairo Sci. Jour, 1909, 


. 4, 
3. Nr The Level of the Subsoil Water in Cairo.” Cairo Scr. Jour, 
1910, p. 95. 
Lumbroso, J. “Le Coton: son influence sur la prospérité générale 
de Egypte.” L’Egypte Contemporaine, No. 2, March 10th, 1910. 
Lumbroso, G. ‘Recherches sur l’Economie Politique de lEgypte 
sous les Lagides.” Paris, 1870. 
Lyons, H. G. 
1. “The Physiography of the Nile Basin.” Survey Dept., Cairo, 
1907, 


188 BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Lyons, H. G. (cont.). 
2. “Some Agricultural Statistics of Egypt.” Cairo Sci. Jour., 


1908, p. 167. 
McCoan, —. “Egypt as it is.” London, 1877. 
Main, F. T. 


1. Ann. Rep. Dep. Ag., Bombay Pres., 1907-1908, p. 11, &e. 
2. “Improvement of Cotton in Sind.” dg. Jour. Ind. II. 4, 
p. 349. Complete history 1846-1906. 
Mangin, —. “L’Egypte,” IL, p. 362. Paris, 1823. 
Mather, Sir Wm. ‘“ Egypt and the Anglo-Egyptian Soudan.” Brit. 
Cott. Gr. Assoc. pamphlet, Oct. 13th, 1910. 
McCall, J. 8. J. 
1. “Notes on Cotton Cultivation in Nyassaland.” Supp. to 
wWVyassaland Gov. Gaz. Oct. 30th, 1909. 
2. “ Agricultural Impressions of the American Cotton Crop.” 
Nyassaland Ag. and Forest Dep., No. 1 of 1909. 
McLachlan, A., with Cooke, O. F., and Meade, R. M. ‘A Study of 
Diversity in Egyptian Cotton.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind., 
Bull. 156, July 24th, 1909. 


Means, —. “Reclamation of Alkali Lands in Egypt.” U.S. Dept. 
Ag., Bur. Soils, Bul/. 2, 1903. 
Mell, P. H. 


1. “Experiments in crossing for the purpose of improving the 
cotton fibre.” Alabama Exp. Sta., Bull. 56, 1894. 

2. “Experiments with foreign cottons.” Alabama Exp. Sta, 
Bull. 71, 1896. 

Mercer, W. B., and Hall, A. D. ‘The experimental error of Field 
Trials.” Jour. Agric. Sci. IV. 2. 

Morley, the Rt. Hon. Viscount Morley of Blackburn. Official Report 
of Reception to deputation of users of Indian Cotton on 
July 27th, 1910. Pub. by International Federation of Master 
Cotton Spinners. 

Mosseri, V. M. 

1. “Le Drainage en Egypte.” Bull. de I’Instit. Egyptien, I. IIL, 
5™ ser., p. LO1-119. 

2. “ Nouvelles observations sur le systéme de lavage superficiel et 
drainage combinés.” Bull. de VInstit. Egyptien, 1911. 

3. “Sur un Pourridé du Cotonnier.” (Communication faite a 
l'Institut Egyptien dans la séance du Décembre, 1903.) 

Orton, W. A. ‘Cotton Wilt.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Farmers’ Bulletin, 
1908. 

Perkins, A. G. 

1. “The Colouring Matter of Cotton Flowers.” Trans. Chem. Soc., 
1909, Vol. 95, p. 2181. 
2. “The Colouring of Hibiscus Sabdariffa and Thespasia Lampas.” 
Trans. Chem. Soc., 1909, Vol. 95. 
Pliny. ‘Historia Naturalis.” Lib. XIX. c. 1. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 189 


Roux, F. C. “Le Coton en Egypte.” Paris, 1908. 

Sandars, L. “The History of Cotton in Egypt.” K. A. 8. Journal, 
1903. 

Saunders, D. A. ‘Report on Hybrids end Selections of Cotton.” 
Amer. Breeders’ Ass. Rep., 1908. 

Schmidt, H. 

1, International Federation of Master Cotton Spinners ; Report on 
the Secretary’s visit to India, 1909. 

2. International Federation of Master Cotton Spinners ; Report on 
the Secretary’s visit to Egypt, 1912. 

Sékaly, Achille. “Le Désastre Cotonnier de 1909 et ses causes.” 
L’Egypte Contemporaine. No. 2, March 10th, p. 276. 

Shear, C. 8., and Miles, G. F. 

1. “The Control of Texas Root-rot of Cotton.” U.S. Dept. Ag., 
Bur. Pl. Ind., Bull. 102, Part V. 

2. “Texas Root-rot of Cotton. Field Exps. in 1907.” U.S. Dept. 
Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind., Cir. 9. 

Shoemaker, D. N. 

1. “Leaf Characters in Cotton Hybrids.” Amer. Breeders’ Assoc. 
Rep., 1909. 

2. “ Vicinism in Cotton in 1908.” Amer. Breeders’ Assoc. Rep., 
1910. 

Smith, A. M. “Limiting Factors and Growth in Ceylon.” Ann. 
Roy. Bot. Gard., Peradenya, IIT. 2. 

Tammes, T. ‘Das Verhalten fluktuierend Variierender Merk- 
male bei der Bastardierung.” ec. des Travaux Botaniques 
Néerlandais, VIII. 3, 1911. 

Thoday, D. 

(1) “ Experimental Researches on Vegetable Assimilation and 
Respiration.” V.—‘“ A critical examination of Sach’s method, 
&e.” Proc. Roy. Soc., B. 82, 1909. 

(2) “ Experimental Researches on Vegetable Assimilation and 
Respiration.” VI. “Some experiments on Assimilation in the 
Open Air.” Proc. Roy. Soc., B. 82, 1910. 

Thompson, J. “On the Mummy Cloth of Egypt.” (1822.) Proe. 
Roy. Soc., 1834. 

Thornton, T. ‘‘ Methods employed in Selection.” W. Ind. Bull. 
1906, VIT. 2, 153. 


Todd, J. A. 
1. “The Uses of Egyptian Cotton.” Cairo Sci. Jour., No. 40, 
Jan., 1910. 


2. “The Demand for Egyptian Cotton.” L’Egypte Contemporaine, 
No. 2, March 1910. 

3. “Political Economy for Egyptian Students.” P.115. “The 
Price of Egyptian Cotton.” Glasgow, 1910. 

4, “Uses of Egyptian Cotton Seed.” Extrait de Egypte Contem- 
poraine, I. II., p. 209 a 221. 


190 BIBLIOGRAPHY 


Todd, J. A. (cont.). 

5. “The Market for Egyptian Cotton in 1909-1910.” Extrait 
de Egypte Contemporaine, I. IJ., p. 1 a 32. 

6. “ Further Notes on the Egyptian Cotton Market, 1910-1911.” 
Cairo Sci. Jour., Jan. 1912. ; 

Tyler, F. J. “The Nectaries of Cotton.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Bur. PI. 
Ind., Bull. 13, July, 1908. 

Watkins, J. L. ‘Consumption of Cotton in the Cotton States.” 
Reprint from U.S. Dept. Ag. Year Book, 1903. 

Watt, Sir. G.  ‘“‘ Wild and Cultivated Cottons of the World.” See 
index, “ Egypt.” London, 1907. 

Webber, H. J., and Boykin, E. B. “The Advantage of Planting 
Heavy Cotton Seed.” U.S. Dept. Ag., Farmers’ Bull. 285, 
April, 1907. 

Webber, H. J. “Distribution of Cotton Seed in 1907.” U.S, 
Dept. Ag., Bur. Pl. Ind. 

Weisner, J. ‘Die Rohstoffe des Pflanzenreiches.” B. II. “ Fasern,” 
“Samen.” Leipzig, 1903. 

Wheldale, M._ 1. “ The Chemical Differentiation of Species.” Biochem. 
Jour. V. 10. 

2. “On the formation of Anthocyanin.” Jour. Genetics, I. 2. 

Whitney, Milton. “Fertilizers for Cotton Soils.” U.S. Dept. Ag., 
Bur. Soils. 

Wilkinson, —. ‘‘ Manners and Customs of Ancient Egypt.” London, 
1854, Bull. 62, Sept., 1909. 

Willcocks, Frank C. 

1. “Insects injurious to the Cotton Plant in Egypt.” K. A. 8. 
Year Book, 1905. 

2. “Notes on the Egyptian Cotton-Stainer Bug.” Kk. A. 8. Year 
Book, 1906. 

3. “The Insect Pests of Cotton.” Cairo Sei. Jowr., 1910, p. 55. 

Willeocks, Sir W., K.C.M.G. 

1. “ Egypt Fifty Years Hence.” Khed. Geog. Soc., March 15th, 
1902. 

2. “The White Nile and the Cotton Crop.” Lecture to the Khed. 
Geog. Soc., Jan., 1908. 

3. “A Ten Million Kantar Cotton Crop.” Inst. Egypt., 1911. 

4, “ Egyptian Irrigation.” New Edition, London, 1912. 

Wood, T. B., and Stratton, E. ‘“ The Probable Error of Field Experi- 
ments.” Jour. Ag. Set. III., p. 417. 


INDEX 


ABNORMAL lint-length obtainable, 104 
Absciss layer, 68 
Abyad, 5 
Acceleration of growth by tempera- 
ture, 21, 25 
Acclimatization, 110, 179 
Accumulated temperature, 29 
_ Accumulation of errors in field experi- 
ments, 99 ; 
Aération, controlling sore-shin attack, 
19 
Aéroplane, affecting Egypt, 179 
Aff 5 & “gyp 
Afternoon, condition of plant during, 
43 
Age, of commercial varieties, 106 
affecting fluctuation in height, 93 
of act of crossing, 114 
of differentiation, affecting fluctua- 
tion, 99 
of leaf, influencing photosynthesis, 
51 
of leaf, affecting temperature, 47 
of stomata, 40 
of a variety, 112 
Agricultural characteristics, complex 
inheritance of, 179 
Alkali soil, 88 
Allard, 66, 113, 143 
Allelomorphic pairs, in Kgypto-Upland, 
124 
Allelomorphs, three pairs in petal 
colour, 137 
Alpino, Prosper, 2 
Analysis, of hybrid families, 128 
Angle, of leaf-sinus, 96 
Angles, of sinus, inheritance of, 158 
Anthocyanic strains, 120 
Anthocyanin, fluctuation in, 92 
spot on leaf, 133 
Anthers, colour of, 139 
Antirrhinum, 168 
Aperture, of stomata, 40 
Area, of twelve first leaves, 47 
Areas, under cotton in Egypt, 177 
‘¢ Arrival” of the crop, 30 
Arrival, of crop, 51 
‘¢ Arrival-curve” in time, paraboloid 
form, 53 
Ashmouni, 5 
putative ancestor of varieties, 105 


19 


Asiatic type of plant, 3, 5 
Asphyxiation, of root, 38, 60 
Assimilation of carbon. See Photo- 
syuthesis 

Atkinson, 17 
Audebeau, 44, 72, 176 
Autogenous fluctuation, 129 

affecting leaf-length, 157 

affecting lint quality, 148 

forming modes, 170 

in seed-weight, 167 

possibly affecting lint colour, 146 
Automatic records of stomatal changes, 


Auto-toxy, 60 
Autumn, 51 

temperature of, 98 
Autumnal period, the, 54 


BactERioLoey, soil, 88 

Bagging, of flowers, 117 

Balance, Joly spring, for transpiration, 
45 


Barrage, the Delta, 65 
Bateson, 152 
Bee-proof cages, use of, 178 
Bees, agents of natural crossing, 117 
Benachi, 148 
Biometry. See Correlation and Probable 
error 
Blackman, 25, 47, 88 
Boll-divisions. See Ovary loculi, 163 
Boll, fluctuation in form of, 99 
maturation of, 66 
size and form, inheritance of, 161 
surface, inheritance of, 142 
variation in temperature of, 47 
Boll-shedding. See Shedding 
Boll-size, correlated with seed-weight, 
170 
not correlated with seed-weight in 
pure strains, 100 
Boll-worm, 4 
confused with fog, 43 
effect on tissue temperature, 48 
Bolling, abundant from decreasing 
flowers, 71 
methods of recording, 55 
Bolling-curve, the, 65 


192 


Bolling-curve, effect of shedding, 72 
* fluctuation in, 98 
Bolls, ratio to flowers, 65 
number of, probable error, 57 
Bracts, involucral, fluctuation in, 97 
Branch, flowering, initiation of, 95 
Branches, correlation of growth-rates 
till June, 53 
delayed formation of flowering-, 52 
flowering, growth of, 63 
lateral, growth expressed in flower- 
ing-curve, 62 
Branching, affecting first-rate flower 
date, 52 
affecting seed-weight, 170 
effect on flowering-curve, 62 
effect on height, 152 
fluctuation in, 93 
free, of isolated plants, 44 
‘«Bread and cheese” spinning, 105 
Breaking-strains, 81 
Breeding, essential feature of, 115 
plot, the, 120 
problems of, 178 
Bud, action of environment upon, 52 
flower, shedding of, 63 
initiation of, 95 
terminal, arrest of, 58 
variation in temperature of, 47 


Catcium oxalate, 58 
Callus, after abscission, 69 
Cambium, cork, delimiting sore-shin 
attack, 19 
Cannibalism in cotton, 39, 80 
Capillarity, restoring water to soil, 43 
Carbon assimilation. See Photo- 
synthesis. 
Card Index, 133 
Cell-division, in absciss layer, 69 
Cellulose, deposition of, in lint, 84 
Central segment of leaf, 96 
inheritance, 156 
Centre of gravity of root-system, 75 
Certainty, statistical definition of, 92 
Cessation of growth, 58 
inheritance of, 151 
Character, record of data for, 133 
meristic, inheritance of, 163 
new, bred, 168 
Characters, complex, 179 
miscellaneous, inheritance of, 175 
qualitative, heredity of, 133 
quantitative, inheritance of, 150 
Chromosomes, minute size of, 8 
somatic number, 12 
Cleistogamy, 118 
Climate. See Meteorology 
surface, 15 
Climates, new, 179 
reducing transpiration, 44 
Clouds, effect on growth, 28 
increased growth, 29 


INDEX 


Clouds, affecting tissue-temperature, 
affecting stomata, 42 
effect on leaf-temperature by day and 
night, 48 
Coalescence, possible, of ovary loculi, 
1 


Coefficient of variation, 92 
Cold, fictitious killing of seed by, 19 
Colonial development of cotton 
cultivation, 179 
Colorimetric grading, advisable, 137 
Colour, of anthers, 139 
fluctuation in, 92 
inheritance of, 145 
matching of, 136 
of fuzz, 102 
of leaf, inherited, 133 
of lint, inheritance of, 146 
of petal, inheritance of, 136 
Column, fluctuation in, 97 
length, inheritance of, 159 
Commerce and gametes, 175 
Commercial product. See Lint and 
Spinning 
general, 105 
varieties, composition of, 89 
varieties, irregular, lint-length of, 
103 
Comparison of varieties, 57 
of observations, 55 
Composite, ray-florets of, 163 
Composition of groups and races, 89 
of sheddings, 67 
Computation, of natural crossing, 123 
of records, 55 
Constitutional differences in a popula- 
tion, 109 
Contamination by parent variety, 112 
Contraction, of stem in sunshine, 28 
Cook, 145 
Cork, 18-19 
Correlation, night-temperature 
growth, 30 
absent, between seed-weight and 
boll-size in pure strains, 100 
curvilinear, 95 
height and first flower, 52 
in pure strains, of lint-weight and 
seed-weight, 101 
in growth-rates of branches till 
June, 53 
of internode-lengths, 32 
of lint-strength with shedding and 
lint-weight, 85 
of lint-weight with seed-weight, 
of height fluctuation and other 
characters, 94 
of flowers, total and bolls, total, 98 
of seed-weight and ginning out- 
turn, 101 
of lint-weight and ginning out-turn, 
101 


and 


INDEX 


Correlation of seed-weight with other 
characters, 101 
causing autogenous 
irresolvable, 129 
of boll width and loculi, 163 
of growth-rate and height, 153 
of lint-length and seed-weight, 173 
of sew eet with other characters, 
1 
possible of growth, and composition 
of pollen, 124 
-diagram test, for segregation, 159 
Cotton fibre. See Lint 
Mendel’s Law applicable to, 132 
worm, effect on flowering, 98 
worm, effect of mild attack, 88 
Cotyledons, stomata of, 39 
oe gametic, in petal spot, 
1 


fluctuation, 


Craig, 45, 86, 129 
Critical date for sowing, 53 
period, the, 54, 65 
period, overlapped by next, 79 
Crop, arrival of. See Arrival 
of 1903, high ginning out-turn, 
86. 
of 1909, 54, 64, 79 
of 1910, early, 53 
of 1911, late, 53 
Crops, short, effect on price, 17 
variation in, 180 
Crosses. See Hybrids 
Crossing, of reputed species, 127 
Cryptomeres, in fuzz-inheritance, 143 
Cultivation, general, relation of research 
to, 180 
Cuticle of lint, 82 
for extra length of lint, 104 
Cytology of lint, 82 


Daity growth, 59 
Damping-off fungi, 18 
Darkness, effect on stomata, 40 
Darwin, F., 40 
Date of sowing. See Sowing date 
Death-point, 24 
Death of roots, 38 

of root through asphyxiation, 79 
Density of lint, 82 
Desiccation of soil causing higher 

tissue-temperature, 50 

effect on stomata, 41 

local, of soil near roots, 43 
Deterioration of varieties, 5 

of commercial varieties, 112 

of Egyptian yield, 176 
Determination, maternal, 

weight, 100 

Development of flower, 97 

of leaf, 96 

of root-system, 33 

of stomata, 40 

stages in, 14, 54 


of seed- 


£93 


Differentiation of gametes, 125 
of ovary-loculi, 99, 166 
Disastrous effect of early flood, 54 
Diseases, fungoid and insect, 88 
fungoid, 17, 19, 88 
Dissection of curves, method, 129 
of frequency, polygon, 168 
Distribution of lint on seed, inheritance 
of, 145 
Double fertilisation, 12 
Drainage, development of, 178 
relation of soil temperature to, 37 
Dryness, physiological, 42 
Dry-weight, increase through photo- 
synthesis, 50 
Dust-storms, 29 


Earias insulana. See Boll-worm 
Early maturity, example of, 109 
complex inheritance of, 179 
sowing, probably over-done, 53 
Economics, summary of, 175 
See Todd 
Egyptian, Ancient, method of illumin- 
ation, 79 
hypocotyl shorter than in Upland 
(King), 32 
inter-, only one artificial hybrid in- 
investigated, 130 
Embryo, development of, 12 
sac, 116 
Embryos, mixed, in some ovary, 116 
Embryonic tissue, of root-tip, 32 
weight maternal, 100 
England, growth of cotton in, 32 
Environment, 14, 16, 17, 27, 46, &e. 
affecting leaf form, 96 
effect on fluctuation in flower, 97 
Equilibrium of root and shoot, 70, 95 
of water supply and loss, 28 
Error, curve of, simulated by segrega- 
tion, 128 
of observation, standardised, 191 
probable, q.v. 
Errors, accumulation of, 99 
Evaporation. See Critical period 
Evidence on heredity, four classes, 130 
Evolution of fuzz, 145 
Exhaustion of food, not the cause of 
“ staling,” 22 
Experiments, useless, 56 
Expert. See Grading expert 
External appearance of ‘‘ Varieties,” 
06 


Extinct varieties, 4, 105 


Factors, constituting fuzz, 144 
controlling loculi of ovary, 166 
of stem-height, 151 

Failure of seed-supply, 

tinuous, 178 
Fallacies of correlation methods, 129 
Fallacy, principal, of  selection- 

methods, 123 


unless con- 


Oo 


194 


Family, composed wholly of rogues, 
123 


Ferrar, 177 
Fertilisation, 10 
affecting shedding, 69 


double, 12 
self, 113 
Fibre, cotton. See lint, 81 
Field conditions, soil temperature 
under, 15 


transpiration under, 45 
Field experiments, precision of, 56 
accumulation of error in, 99 
Field-germination, 17 
Field conditions of stomata, 41 
Field crop, natural crossing in, 113, 
125 
amount of natural crossing in, 116 
flowering in, 63 
root-interference in, 35 
shedding in, 67 
Filament, fluctuation in, 97 
length, inheritance of, 159 
Files, 132, 135 
Fine-spinning, varieties for, 105 
First cross intensification, 168 
First Flower, the, 51 
correlated with seed-weight, 101 
correlation with height, 52 
delayed by stunting, 52 
effect on yield, 95 
fluctuation correlated with height, 
95 
fluctuation in, 98 
First generation, strong germination 
of, 123 
Fletcher, F., 5 
Flood, early, effect in 1909, 54 
effect of arrival of, 64 
Flower, the first. See First Flower 
farm, inheritance of, 159 
fluctuation in form of, 97 
primordia of, 6 
structure of, 118 
un-crossable, 118 
Flowers, ratio to bolls, 65 
Flowering, abundant, 62 
delay in, 52 
effect of night-temperature upon, 
30 
irregular caused by sore-shin, 19 
methods of recording, 55 
Flowering-curve, the, 61 
affected by water-table, 62, 64 
de-caudation of, 65 
effect of bud-shedding, 63 
fluctuation in, 98 
summarising growth of 
branches, 61 
similar, 72 
Fluctuation, 89, 91 
affected by age of differentiation, 
99 


lateral 


INDEX 


Fluctuation, autogenous, 129 
causing blending of modes, 128 
from various dates of sowing, 53 
in colour, 92 
in growth-curve, 94 
in height and branching, 93 
of pollen-tubes, 124 
selection of, 108 
Fog, effects of, 43 
Fogs, without effect on tissue-tem- 
perature, 48 
Forecast of 1909 disaster, 79 
Form, of boll, fluctuation in, 99 
flower, inheritance of, 159 
inheritance of, 156, 161 
leaf, 95 
new, 159 
of involucral bract, inheritance of, 
160 
root system, 33, 75 
stipule, 141 
Formula for computation of natural 
crossing, 115 
Frequency polygons, condensed in the 
diagrams, 133 
dissection of, 129 
Fruit. See Boll 
Function of root system, 75 
Fungoid diseases, 17, 19, 88 
Fungus, analogy with pollen-tube, 121 
Fuzz, classes of, 102 
colour, inheritance of, 145 
inheritance of distribution, 142 
irregularity of commercial varieties 
in, 107 
of seed fluctuation in, 101 
F,, definition of symbol, 109 
Fyson, 136, 143 


G. herbaceum, 5 
G. hirsutum, 5 
G. Sturtii, 97 
G. vitifolium, 5 
Gallini, 5 
Galvanometer, the ‘‘ Thread,” 15, 47 
Gametes, 6 
and commerce, 175 
nuclear composition of, 124 
Gametic composition non-uniform, 89 
coupling, probable in lint colour, 
146 


coupling in petal spot, 139 
differentiation, 125 
impurity, 108 
Gaussian curve, ]28 
Gauze, wire, for exclusion of bees, 118 
Generation, first pollen of, 124 
sixth raised, 124 
Genetics, general, 127 
interpreted by fluctuation, 90 
Geographical distribution of ‘‘vari- 
eties,” 106 
Geology, surface, 88 


INDEX 


Germination, 15 
over-heating prejudicial to, 25 
rate of, 16 
strength of, 123 
Gibson, 176 
Ginning out-turn, fluctuation in, 101 
correlated with strength, 86 
the, 86 
Glands, of boll, 141 
Glass plate, graduated, for leaf-form, 


Grading expert, 82 
difficulties of, 147 
Green lint, of ‘‘ Texas” wool, 102 
Growth, accelerated by leaf-removal, 28 
affected by clouds, 28 
affected by humidity of air, 28 
affected by night temperature, 30 
and temperature, 20 
summary, 26 
cessation of, 58 
cessation of, affecting flowering, 61 
daily, 59 
effect of soil on, 54 
follows chemico-physical laws, 21 
intercalary of lint, 83 
limited by root-size, 35 
methods of recording, 55 
not controlled by night-temperature, 
60 
of flowering branches, 63 
of leaf, 96 
of pollen-tube, 124 
of stem, insignificant effect of day- 
temperatures, 29 
rarely limited by photosynthesis, 51 
record, daily, 16, 17, 30 
slower in secondary roots, 33 
slowing of, 60 
Growth-acceleration by temperature, 
21, 25 
Growth-cessation, affecting leaf-size, 156 
correlation with seed-weight, 170 
inheritance of, 151 : 
Growth curve, 58 
fluctuation in, 94 
Growth-rate, affecting first-flower date, 
2 


5 
inheritance of, 151, 153 
of root, 37 


Hatrs. See Hirsuteness, 140 
Hamouli, 5 
Hanging-drop chamber, special, 20 
Heat-poisoning. See Thermotoxy 
Height, unaffected by branching, 152 
change of fluctuation with age, 93 
correlated with seed-weight, 101 
correlation with first flower, 52 
factors composing, 151 
fluctuation, correlated with other 
characters, 94 


ee) 


Height, fluctuation in, 93 
heterozygous selected family, 109 
inheritance of, 150 
measurement with water-level, 93 
new forms bred, 154 
of seedling, 31 

Helianthus, shows sunshine-effect, 28 

Henry, Yves, 81 

Heredity of flower-form, applied, 119 
general, 127 
human, 132 
nature of results about, 129 

Herodotus, 1 

Heterogeneity of commercial varieties, 

106 


of Hindi, 5 
Heterozygous origin of a selection, 108 
plant, selection of, 109 
Hindi, natural crossing with Egyptian, 
122 
identification by leaf-spot, 133 
origin of, 5 
self-coloured petal, 138 
weed-cotton, 106 
Hirsuteness, 140 
of Hindi, 106 
History, 1 
Holton, 140, 141 
Huyhes, 71, 86, 88 
Human heredity, 132 
Humidity of air, effect on growth, 28 
effect on leaf-temperature, 48 
of soil, 36, 38 
Hybridisation, natural. See Natural 
crossing ; 
Hybrids investigated, 127, 130 
Hypocotyl, length of, 31 
stomata of, 39 


Ipiosyncrasizs of the plant, 31 
Illumination, 51 
Immune strains, from vicinism, 125 
Immunity of style to pollen, 121 
Impurity of varieties, cause of, 110 
universal, 111 
Indian cottons, impurity of varieties 
in, 11] 
Individual, record of date for, 132 
Infiltration, effects of, 60 
Inheritance, complexity affected by 
systematic relation, 149 
See Heredity. 
Insect pests, 88 
Insulation from heat by dry soil, 15 
Inter-cellular spaces, 38 
Interference of roots, 35 
Internode, first, specific length of, 32 
length of, 58 
length, inheritance of, 150 
Interval between plants not sole 
factor in vicinism, 120 
Involucral bract, form, inheritance of, 160 
bracts, fluctuation in, 97 


° 2 


196 


Irregularity of lint length, 83 
Irrigation, difficulty of adjusting, 54 

affecting shedding, 70 

affecting stomata, 41 

causing modes in growth curve, 60 

effect on soil water, 76 

effect on water-table, 176 

of various soils, 71 

relation of soil-research to, 180 

restriction of, 178 

work wanted on soil-moisture, 77, 180 
Isolation of varieties, 110 


Jannovitz. See Yannovitch 

Joly balance, for transpiration, 45 
Jumel, 2, 3 

Jumel cotton, re-appearance in Fy, 148 


‘““KHAMSIN ” weather, 29 
Kinds of cotton, grown on breeding- 
plot, 123 


Lamina, plication of, 96 
Leaf, age of, 40 
age affecting temperature, 47 
Leaf-area, high in wide-sowing, 44 
Leaf, area of twelve first, 47 
colour, inherited, 133 
development of, 96 
fluctuation in, 95 
form, inheritance of, 156 
form of, 95 
increase in dry-weight of, 50 
length, correlated with seed-weight, 
100 


fluctuation correlated with height, 


new forms bred, 159 
shedding of, 67, 69 
spot of, 133 
symmetry of, 50 
variation in temperature of, 47 
Leaves, removal inducing growth, 28 
effect of removal on photosynthesis, 
29 
stomata of, 39 
Leake, 62, 93, 113, 120, 136, 152, 156 
Ledger, 132 
page of, 94 
Length of floral organs, inheritance of, 
1 


of leaf, fluctuation in, 95 

inheritance of, 156 

“‘Length” of lint, commercial, 87 
period of determination, 83 
examining development, 82 
inheritance of, 173 
irregularity in, 83 
See Lint-length 

Length of sinus of leaf, inheritance of, 
158 

Levant, mudern Asiatic cotton in, 3 

Life of a variety, 112 


INDEX 


Life-story, beginning of, 6 
Light, effect on stomata, 41 
Limitation of root, 44 
raises ginning out-turn, 101 
Line, pure, 89 
Linin, 8 
Lint, abnormally long, 104 
colour, related to fuzz colour, 102 
colour, inheritance of, 146 
correlated with seed weight, 101 
cytology of, 82 
depreciated by fog, 44 
development of, 81 
distribution on seed, inheritance of, 
145 
nature of differences in, 147 
new, bred true, 173 
phylogeny of, 102 
research desirable on, 180 
strength of, 84 
“style,” inheritance of, 147 
superfine in F,, 147 
the only distinction between ‘‘ vari- 
eties,” 108 
twist of, 84 
Lint-length, irregular, of commercial 
varieties, 107 
fluctuation in, 102 
inheritance of, 173 
Lint-weight, fluctuation in, 101 
correlated with seed-weight, 86, 101 
correlated with strength, 85 
Linum, 136 
Loculi of ovary, determinants of, 166 
affecting width, 163 
fluctuation in, 99 
inheritance of, 163 
new forms bred, 165 
Lucas, 177 


Maho Bey, 8 
Man, heredity in, 132 
Manufacvure of cotton plants, 179 
Manufacture, specialisation of, 178 
Manures, 88 
affecting out-turn, 86 
Marshall Ward, 121 
Massed data, the fourth grade of 
heredity evidence, 130 
Matching of colours, 92 
Maternal determination of embryo- 
weight, 180 
Matthaer, 47 
Maturation of boll, 66 
interval, fluctuation in, 98 
sub-division of, 83 
Medieval period, 2 
Mendelian evidence, summary of four 
classes, 130 
Mendel’s Law, in cotton, 132 
misinterpretation of, 145 
Meristic character, inheritance of, 163 
Mesophyll, 41 


INDEX 


Meteorology, at Cairo, 14, 16, 17, 27, 
46 


clouds and dust-storms, 29 
Methods of investigation, in second 
half of development, 55 
of gametic differentiation, 126 
Methods of investigating, autogenous 
fluctuation, 129 
fluctuation. See each character, in 
Chapter V. 
for photosynthesis, 50 
fungus-growth and temperature, 20 
heredity, 132. See also Fluctua- 
tion 
in genetics, 91 
inheritanceof quantitativecharacters, 
150 
internode-length, 31 
Ledger and Files, 94 
length of lint, 82, 87 
lint, 81 : 
natural crossing, 113 
of root-system, 37, 39, 79 
parasitism of pollen, 122 
root-depth, 77 
root-growth and temperature, 24 
shedding, 66 
soil-water, 76 
stomatal changes, 40 
sunshine-effect, 28 
temperature of seed-bed, 15 
tissue-temperatures, 47 
transpiration, 44 
varietal impurity, 111 
water-table effects, 70-75 
Microscopic examination of lint, 82 
Mid-rib. See Leaf-length 
Minor varieties, 105 
Mixture between varieties, 111 
Modes, appression of, 128 
origin of, by autogenous fluctuation, 
170 


yearly coincidence of, 130, 155 
Mohammed Ali, 3, 5 
Moist chamber, special, 20 
Monopodia, 62 
Morning, maximum photosynthesis in, 
51 


Mother-cells of gametes, 6, 7 
Mummy-cloths, 1 
Mutation, 97, 178 


Nacamuli, 148 
Naphthalene, dressing for seed, 20 
Napoleon Buonaparte, 2 
Native cultivator, limitations of, 179 
Natural crossing, 113 

and floral structure, 118 

cause of, 117 

computation of, 123 

factors influencing, 120 

formula for, 116 

in field crop, 125 


197 


Natural crossing, prevention of, 117 
research desirable on, 180 
Natural selection, 110 
effect of, 107 
Necessary facilities for 
researches, 128 
Nets, mosquito, 117 
disadvantage of, 127 
invariably used on F,, 128 
Netting of pure strains, 91 
Network of  sore-shin throughout 
Egypt, 18 
Night, clouds during, affecting tissue 
temperature, 48 
Night-temperature, 29, 30 
affecting first flower, 53 
losing control of growth, 59 
Nile valley, a long field for reszarch, 180 
Nubari, probable future of, 105». © 
Nuclear composition of gametes, 124 
Nuclear division, mechanism of, 8 
Nucleus of lint-cell, 82 
Nyctitropism, 88 


heredity 


OBSERVATION-ROW method, 57 

Observations, of flowering, &c., 55 

Offspring of selected plants, 110 

Oil, 13 

Okra-leaf, 97 : 

Ontogeny of leaf, 95 

Optimum temperature, significance of, 
25 

Origin of modern varieties, 3 

Oscillation, rapid, in leaf temperature, 
48 


of functional C.G. of root, 78 
Out-turn on ginning. See Ginning 
out-turn : 

Ovary, loculi, inheritance of, 163 
loculi of. See Boll, loculi of 
Ovary, primordia of, 6 
Over-heating of tissues from water- 
shortage, 50 : 
Oxygen, deficiency in soil, 38 
PaRABOLOID form of curve of 
“arrival” in time, 53 
Parasitism, of pollen-tube, 121 
Parents, commercial, resemblance of 
offspring to, 110, 114 
Pedigree of pure strain in lint-length, 103 
Percentage, probable error, 92 
Perception of colour, 92 
Perennial growth. See Rattoons 
Periods of development, 54 
Pertz, 40 
Peruvian type of plant,2,5 
stock, probable, in hybrid, 132. 
Petal, colour of, 134 
colour-inheritance, 136 
fluctuation in, 97 
length, inheritance of, 159 
spot, inheritance of, 138 


198 
Phloem, injury causing water-shortage, 
19 


Photosynthesis, 50 
and leaf colour, 134 
effect of defoliation on, 29 
highest-recorded value, 51 
possible growth-limitation in early 
morning by, 30 
stomatal movements affecting, 42 
Phylogeny of fuzz, 102, 144 
of Gossypium, 5 
of leaf, 95 
of parents of hybrids, 130 
Physical explanation of 
division, 10 
Physics, of soil, 44 
Physiological drought, 42 
Physiology. See the Individual, 6 
interpreting fluctuation, 90 
differences between ‘‘ varieties,” 106 
supplementary data from Genetics, 
175 


nuclear 


Picking, inferior to bolling-curve,-57 
-date, effect of district on, 53 
Pickings, varying strength of, 85 
Pits, simple, in lint cell-wall, 84 
Pliny, 1 
Plot, the breeding, kinds of cotton on, 
123 


more vicinism in, 119 
Poisons, effect on stomata, 41 
Pollen, development of, 10 
mixture by, 111 
parent, unknown, 144 
research desirable on, 180 
variety of, in first generation, 124 
Pollen-tube, branching of 12 
analogy with fungus, 121 
Pollination, cross. See Natural cross- 
ing, 117 
mixed, 116 
method of, 122 
absence of provoking shedding, 69 
Porometer, the, 40 
Position, effect on vicinism, 120 
**Pot-bound” plants in field crop, 
35 
Pot culture, abnormal at three weeks 
old, 35, 44 
Potometer, unsuccessful, 45 
‘*P.p.p.d,” definition of, 55 
Practical man, the, 66, 106 
Precision, required for heredity in 
cotton, 128 
Prepotency of pollen, 122 
F, pollen, 125 
Prevention, of natural crossing, 117 
Price, inflated, of Egyptian cotton, 
178 
Primitive cottons, 97 
and fuzz, 102 
Primordia of flower, 6 
of leaves, 158 


INDEX 


Probable error of boll-form, boll-loculi, 


of bolls, weight of, 99 
of bolls, number of, 57 
of yield, 57 
of field experiments, 56 
of first-flower date, 98 
of floral organs, 97 
of ginning out-turn, 101 
of height, 93, 109- 
of leaf-halves, 50 
of leaf-length, 95 
of lint-length,. 83, 104 
of lint-weight, 101 
of maturation interval, 66, 98 
of seed, testa,and embryo-weights, 100 
of seed-weight, 100 
of shedding (retained flowers), 99 
of sinus of leaf, 96 
of total flowers per plant, 99 
of yield per plant, 99 
percentage, defined, 92 
standardisation of, 91 
Prodenia littoralis. See Cotton worm 
Propagation, rate of, 98 
Ptolemaic period, 1 
Pure forms, bred from Egypto-Upland, 
150 
Pure strain or line, 89 
compared with commercial varieties, 
107 
origin of, 91 
strains,commercial utilisation of, 178 


QUALITATIVE characters, heredity of, 
133 
Quality, depreciation of Egypt’s crop 
in, 
Quality of lint, inheritance of, 146 
Quantitative characters, inheritance of, 
150 
Race, the, 89 
Rapid reaction to shedding-stimulus, 68 
Rate of growth, inheritance of, 151, 153 
of propagation, 98 
of root-growth, 37 
Rattoons, 118 
use of, 128 
Reaction of environment on organism, 
31 
Recessive character, contamination by, 
114 
Reconquest of water-logged soil, 80 
Record values for photosynthesis, 51 
Records, of crops, 180 
system of keeping, 132 
Red-leaf cottons, 120 
Reduction division, 8 
Regeneration of root, 79 
Regression of a fluctuation, 108 
Renewal of seed, 178 
Reputed species, intercrossed, 127 
Research, lines for future, 180 


INDEX 


Research on heredity, necessary facili- 
ties for, 128 
Resin-glands, 13, 31, 141 
Resistance of soil to root-growth, 33 
Resting-stage of sore-shin fungus, 18 
Reversion, on crossing, 144 
fictitious, 108 
Rhizomorphs of sore-shin, 18 
Rogueing, from vicinists, 127 
Root, effect of deficient absorption, 69 
affecting stomatal aperture, 41 
area occupied by, 33, 35 
asphyxiation of, 38 
controls fluctuation in seed-weight, 
101 
depth of, new method, 77 
drying of soil by, 61 
effect of pruning, 68 
growth controlled by temperature in 
field, 36 
investigation of growth, 37 
limitation, 44 
modification by water-table, 33 
normal colour, 19 
origin of, 32 
penetration of soil by, 33 
regeneration of, 79 
secondaries, 33 
tap-root, depth of, 32 
tap-root replaced by lateral, 33 
Root-asphyxiation, effect of Barrage 
on, 65 
-asphyxiation, effect on C. G. of root, 
-asphyxiation, of economic import- 
ance, 176 
-asphyxiation affecting flowering, 62, 
64 


-asphyxiation in September, 60 
-asphyxiation, causing shedding, 70 
-asphyxiation, effects lessened by 
wide-sowing, 69 
-interference in field crop, 63 
Root-development, 75 
Root-system, economic importance of, 
180 
-system, centre of gravity of, 75 
-system, form of, 33 
-system, limited, giving higher out- 
turn, 101 
Root-tip, 32 
Roots, drying soil, 43 
interlacing of, 35, 38 
new, 80 
variable water supply to, 56 
Row, observation, 57 


28, see Angles 

Sachs, 50 

Salt, 88 

Sap-colour, of petal, 138 

Saturation of soil, partial, 77 
with water, 38 


199 


Sea Island, 3, 105 
Sea Toland stock, probable, in hybrid, 
13: 
Sea Islands, impurity of varieties in, 
lll 
Seed, inheritance of distribution of 
lint on, 145 
difficulty of preparing pure, 127 
mixture, 111 
unfertilised, lint of, 83 
Seed fuzz, fluctuation in, 101. 
tance of 142 
Seedling, size of, affected by tilth, 31 
length of stem, 31 
Seeds, of Egyptian, with entire fuzz, 
143 


Inheri- 


resembling Hindi, 142 
Seed-supply, essential feature of, 118 
advantage of simplicity, 179 
project for, 178 
Seed-weight, not correlated with boll- 
size in pure strains, 100 
affecting lint-length, 173 
correlation with lint-weight, 86 
fluctuation in, 100 
inheritance of, 167 
Segmentation of leaf, 95 
Segregation, shown by correlation 
diagram, 159 
absent, in embryo-weight, 100 
of pure from impure strains, 114 
result simulating curve of error, 128 
simple in seed-weight, 173 
Selection, fallacies of, 107 
natural, effect of, 107 
of heterozygote, 109 
old views on, 108 
the great fallacy of, 123 
Senescence, of leaf, 48 : 
Sennaar, Asiatic type of plant in, 3 
Sequence of fluctuation independent of 
ontogeny, 97 
Seventy-seven, ‘‘77.” See Pure strains 
Shedding, 67 
caused by root-asphyxiation, 70 
effect of paper bags, 117 
of buds, 63 
of flowers affecting bolling-curve, 65 
Shedding-curve, the, 67 
affecting first-flower date, 52 
and strength of lint, 84, 85 
composition of, 67 
determination by subtraction, 66 
mean, 99 
methods of recording, 55 
percentage, 72 
scientific and economic importance 
of, 67, 70 
two maxima, 72 
Short-style flower, breeding of, 159 
Significance of field results, 58 
Single-plant selection, offspring non- 
uniform, 107 


200 


Sinus of leaf, 96 
length, inheritance of, 158 
probable error of, 96 
Size of boll, inheritance of, 161 
of leaf, inheritance of, 156 
of root-system, limiting growth, 36 
Sleep-movement, 88 
Soil constitution, 88 
deficiency in oxygen, 38 
depth of, effect on root-system, 75 
disturbance, to avoid, 45 
dry, causes over-heating of tissues, 50 
effect of disturbing, 71 
effect of texture, 31 
humidity of, 36, 38 
importance of deeper layers, 78 
main control transferred to, 54 
physics, 45 
resistance to root-growth, 33 
temperature, 15, 16 
temperature as affecting drainage, 
37* 
texture, effect on irrigation method, 
71 
texture affecting shedding, 70 
top, not providing water, 78 
variation in, 56 
volume required by root, 74 
volume occupied by roots, 35, 63 
water, change of content, 75 
water-content, changing near roots, 
43 
-water-content affecting stomata, 41 
Soil-water, ideal distribution, 76 
water, problems, 71 
affected by size of root, 61 
Sore-shin, 17 
differentiating effect of, 123 
resting-stage, 18 
rhizomorphs, 18 
vitality of, 18 
Sowing, 15 
tendency to over-early, 53 
date, critical, 53 
effect of district on, 53 
effect on first flower, 53 
effect on growth-curve, 61 
without influence on shedding, 70 
distance of, affecting ginning out- 
turn, 86 
affecting height of 
curve, 63 
affecting root-form, 34 
affecting shedding, 69 
effect on ginning out-turn, 101 
effect on height, 93 
effect on yield, 98 
Species, grown on breeding-plot, 123 
elementary of Hindi, 106 
reputed inter-crossed, 127 
sub-, of Nyam-Nyam cotton, 97 
Species-hybrids, 127, more complex 
than variety-hybrids, 144 


flowering 


- Statistical constants. 


INDEX 


Specific differences in first-flower date, 
52 


gravity of lint, 81 
length of hypocotyl, 31 
nature of flowering-curve, 61 
of growth curve, 58 
of internode length, 32 
of lint-length, 83 
of maturation-interval, 66 
Speed, exceptional of nuclear division, 
8, of fertilisation, 12 
Spinner, scanty information for the, 


Spinning, beginning of Egypt’s reputa- 
tion, 5 
“bread and cheese,” 105 
fine ; competition between Egyptian 
and Georgia’s, etc., 5 
varieties for, 105 
of Upland replacing Egyptian, 178 
Spores, micro- and macro-, 10 
Spot, of leaf, 133 
of petal, inheritance of, 138 
Stages of development, 14, 54 
Staleness of tissue, 25 
Staling of culture-medium, 22, 24 
Standard deviation, 92 
Staple, fine, with heavy yield, 106 
State control of seed, 3 
supply of seed, 178 
See Correlation 
and Probable error 
expression of fluctuation, 92 
methods, 56 
Statistics of gametic impurity, 110 
in Mendelism, 132 
of natural crossing, 115 
Stem height, inheritance of, 150 
length of, in seedling, 31 
Stimuli, transmission of, 67, 69 
Stipule, form, inheritance of, 141 
Stomata, 38 
affecting photo-synthesis, 51 
immature, 40 
occurrence, 39 
effect on shedding, 69 
affecting internal temperature, 50 
blocked by water, 43 
closure at Sunset, 43 
controlling transpiration, 
regulating transpiration, 46 
size of, 39 
Stomatal changes, in aperture, 40 
under field conditions, 41 
closure causes rise of temperature, 


50 

Stomatograph, the, 41 

record coincident with photosyn- 

thesis, 51 

Strain, pure, 89 

Strains, immune from vicinism, 125 

Stratton, 56 

Strength of lint, 81, 84 


INDEX 


Strength of lint affected by water- 
table, 85 
correlated with shedding and lint- 
weight, 85 e 
Stunting, delays flowering, 52 
by sore-shin, 19 
effect on yield, 95 
Style, accessibility of, 119 
fluctuation in, 97 
length, inheritance of, 159 
short, 118 
Sub-soil, variation in texture, 56 
water. See Water-table. 
Sub-species, of Hindi, 106 
cleus ead of Upland for Egyptian, 
178 
Subterranean research, 180 
Subtraction-method of determining 
shedding, 66 
Sudan. Nyam-Nyam Kidney, 97 
old cottons in, 2 
Sunset, closure of stomata at, 43 
Sunshine, effect of on growth, 26 
and shedding, 69 
effect, probably limiting root-growth, 
34 


d 
excluded by nets, 118 
killing cut stems, 45 
limited by size of root, 36 
on lint-cell-wall, 84 
suppressed, 60 
possible effect on lint, 81 
rarely limiting photosynthesis, 51 
stomata opened in, +1 
Superior plants from sowings on criti- 
cal date, 53 
Supply of pure seed, 178 
Surface climate, 15, 44 
Susceptibility to vicinism, 120 
Symmetry of leaf, 50 
Sympodia, 62 
Systematy, 5 


zt, see Angles 

Tammes, 136 

Tank experiments, 74 

Tap-root. See Root. 

Target-diagram, of varietal composi- 

tion, 111 

Temperature, accumulated, 29 
affecting maturation of boll, 66 
and growth, 20 
and growth, summary, 26 
controlling sore-shin, 18 
controls root-growth in field, 36 
cotton-worm, 98 
day, effect on growth, 29 
effect on sore-shin, 24 
fog concomitant with low, 44 
night, effect on growth, 29, 30 
night, losing control of growth, 60 
of autumn affecting recovery from 

worm, 98 


201 


Temperature of leaf, changing rapidly, 
48 


of plant raised by water shortage, 50 
of soil, 15, 16 
of tissue, 47 
regulation of internal, 48 
Temperature-acceleration of growth, 
1, 
Terrace experiment, 71 
experiment, lint from, 84 
Testa, weight of, 100 
Texture of lint-cell-wall, 84 
Thermic effects. See Thermotoxy 
Thermo-electric measurement of micro- 
scope-field-temperature, 20 
Thermo-regulation of tissue tempera- 
ture, 48 
Thermotoxy, reducing correlation be- 
tween night-temperature and 
growth, 30 
affecting flowering, 62 
checking growth of stem, 29 
definition, 25 
from water-shortage, 50 
hastens senescence of leaf, 48 
inheritance of liability to, 152, 154 
liability to, 59 
recovery from effects, 25 
Thickening of lint-cell-wall, 84 
Thoday, 50 
Thomas, 85, 148 
Thread-rings in nucleus, 10 
Three hundred and ten, ‘‘310.” See 
Pure strains 
Three-lobed leaves, 96 
Tilth, effect on seedling, 31 
Time, economy of, in methods, 91 
of sowing. See Sowing date. 
Tissue temperature and shedding, 69 
temperature raised by stomatal 
closure, 50 
temperature, 
shortage, 50 
Tissue temperatures, 47 
Todd, for Economics 
Cotton, 176 
Toxic excreta from sore-shin, 23 
Toxin, possible, in style, 122 
“Transmitting power,” 108 
Transpiration, 44 
excessive, causing shedding, 69 
factors controlling, 46 
rate in field, 45 
regulated by stomata, 39, 46 
severe in July, 78 
stomatal movements affecting, 42 
uniform during morning, 46 
Tree cottons, disappearance of, 4 
Triple nucleus, 12 
Twisting of lint, due to pits, 84 


raised by water- 


of Egyptian 


Unirormity of family, not affecting 
seed-weight, 100 


202 


Unit plant, computation to, 55 
Upland by Egyptian, number of allelo- 
morphs, 124 
crosses with Egyptian, 127, 130 
natural crossing with Egyptian, 122 
similar to Egyptian in reaction to 
sowing date, 53 
strain, heterozygote in 
colour, 140 
substituted for Egyptian, 178 
with green lint, 102 
Upland (King), uniform first-flower, 52 
flowering of, 61 
longer hypocotyl than Egyptian, 32 
maturation of boll, 66 
Uplands, similarity of Hindi to, 
106 
impurity of varieties, 111, 138 


anther 


VaLuE of Egyptian crop, 178 
Variation, discontinuous, 97 
Varieties, commercial, general, 105 
commercial, composition of, 89 
height of, 93 
contamination, not obvious, 11] 
deterioration of, g.v. 
extinct, 105 
minor, 105 
modern, origin of, 4 
new, rate of propagation, 98 
Variety-trials, 56 
Variety-type, 111, 
Vegetate, word mis-used, 43 
Vegetative nucleii of pollen, 10, 124 
Vesting, 2 
Vicinism. See Natural crossing. 
Vitalism, 88, 108, 110 
er for cetecting vicinists, 
12 


Water, distribution in soil, 77 
likely excess of, 54 
loss from stem, 39 
of soil in contact with roots, 43 
principal limiting-factor of soil, 88 
Watering. See Irrigation 
Water-supply from root, 28 
contentof plant determines shedding, 
69 
content of soil, 36, 38 
research desirable, 180 
logging, effect on root, 38 
logged soil re-occupied, 80 
loss, equilibrium with supply, 28 
loss. See Transpiration, 44 
shortage, remedied during night, 43 
and soil-content, 76 
causing stomatal closure, 41 
effect on tissue-temperatures, 48 
through phloem injury, 19 


INDEX 


Water-table, 16, 33 
affecting flowering, 62, 64 
artificial alteration in, 74 
constant, 74 
determination of transpiration by, 


effect on form of root-system, 75 
effect on root-growth, 38 
effect on strength, 85 
hypothesis, economics of, 176 
period, the, 54 
rise of, 60 
rise inducing shedding, 70, 74 
rising, effect on C.G. of root, 79 
rising, kills roots, 79 
Watt, Sir G., 5, 97, 102, 130 
Weather at Cairo, 14, 16, 17, 27, 46 
Weaving, practised in 16th century, 2 
Webber, 113 
Weed-cotton, Hindi, 106 
Weight, dry, of leaves, 50 
loss from transpiration, 45 
of lint per seed. See Lint-weight 
of seed, mean. See Seed-weight, 86 
inheritance of, 167 
Wheldale, 168 
White-flowered Egyptian, 136 
Wide-sowing, high transpiration in, 
44 


Wind, effect on natural crossing, 117 
effect on shedding, 70 
effect on leaf-temperature, 48 
Wood, 56 


*X.” See Thermotoxy 
Xerophyte, cotton a temporary, 14 


YANNOVITCH, 5 
origin of, 105 
yield of, 106 
Year. See Crop 
Yearly contamination of variety, 114 
Yield and lint quality, 106 
and shedding, 75 
Yield, comparison of 
varieties, 107 
complex inheritance of, 179 
decreasing per acre, 176 
effect of sowing-distance on, 98 
fluctuation correlated with height, 
95 
probable error of, 57 
significance of, 56 
total, correlation with Flowering, 
total 


commercial 


ZYGOTE, 6 
Zygotes, origin of, in ‘‘ varieties,” 
108 


Zygotic constitution of w ‘ variety,” 
108 


4. CLAY AND SONS, LTD., BRUNSWICK ST., STAMFORD ST., S.E., AND BUNGAY, SUFFOLK, 


MACMILLAN’S 
SCIENCE MONOGRAPHS 


8vo. 


T is intended that the Volumes in this Series shall 

represent the expression of modern scientific work and 
thought in definite directions. Each Volume will be unique, 
inasmuch as the author will describe chiefly his own con- 
tributions to the specific subject of scientific research with 
which it deals, Results and conclusions reached after years 
of investigation will be embodied in the monographs, as 
well as original work not previously published. The 
Series will thus present in convenient form the views of 
high scientific authorities upon subjects of outstanding 
importance ; and it will make eventually a standing cyclo- 
pedia of progress in natural knowledge. 


VOLUMES READY. 
CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE AND CHEMICAL 


CONSTITUTION. By A. E. H. TUTTON, D.Sec., M.A., F.R.S., 
A.R.C.Sc.(Lond.).  §s. net. , 


NATUORE.—“ It is a goodly story that Dr. Tutton has to tell, and well is it 
told: without wearying the reader with an unwieldy mass of details, he presents in 
all essential completeness a vivid picture of an unusually coherent series of investiga- 
tions. . . . The book is one that should be read and studied by all interested in 
crystals, their properties, and their formation.” 


STABILITY IN AVIATION. By G. H. Bryan, 


Sc.D., F.R.S., Professor of Mathematics in the University College of North 
Wales. 5s. net. 


WESTMINSTER GAZETTE.—‘“‘ We welcome Professor Bryan’s book 
because it will go far to awaken the interests of scientific men in what has hitherto 
been regarded as a fruitless pursuit ; and, so far as it treats of known types of flying- 
machines and their variants, it will doubtless lead to aeroplane stability being made 
the subject of much more continuous study and investigation than has been possible 
in the past.” 


I 


Macmillan’s Science Monographs 


VOLUMES READY—Continued. 
STUDIES IN TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM. 


By C. CHREE, M.A., Sc.D., LL.D., F.R.S.  §s. net. 


ATHEN ZUM. —“ These ‘ Studies’ are not suited to the requirements of the 
beginner in the subject, but rather to those of the advanced student or the professional 
magnetician. Such readers will find a mass of interesting details in the book.” 


STUDIES IN RADIOACTIVITY. By Prof. W. H. 
tan poe F.R.S., Cavendish Professor of Physics in the University of 


THE COTTON PLANT IN EGYPT: STUDIES 


IN GENETICS AND PHYSIOLOGY. By W. LAWRENCE BALLS, 
M.A., Botanist to the Egyptian Government Department of Agriculture. 


VOLUMES IN PREPARATION. 
IMPROVEMENT OF WHEAT AND OTHER 


CEREALS. By R. H. BIFFEN, Professor of Agricultural Botany in the 
University of Cambridge. 


THE ASCENT OF SAP. By Prof. H. H. Dixon, 


Professor of Botany in the University of Dublin. 


THE ORIGIN OF ORE DEPOSITS AND THE 
EXTENT OF FUTURE SUPPLIES. By Dr. J. W. GREGORY, F.R.S., 


Professor of Geology in the University of Glasgow. 


SOLAR RESEARCHES. By Dr. G. E. Harr, 


For. Mem. R.S., Director of the Solar Observatory of the Carnegie Institution 
of Washington. 


THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH. By Dr. A. E. H. 


LOVE, F.R.S., Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of 
Oxford. 


HYDROGRAPHY OF THE NILE BASIN. By 


Capt. H. G. LYONS, F.R.S. 


TRYPANOSOMES AND ALLIED ORGANISMS. 
py uel E. A. MINCHIN, Professor of Protozoology in the University of 


WIND PRESSURE, By Dr. T. E. Stanton, National 


Physical Laboratory. 


RESEARCHES IN MAGNETO - OPTICS. By 


Dr. P. ZEEMAN, Professor of Physics in the University of Amsterdam. 


And many others, 


MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON, 


2 


Illustrated. 


8vo. 


8s. 6d. net. 


SPICES 


By HENRY N. RIDLEY, 


M.A., C.M.G., F.R.S., F.L.S. 


Director of Botanic Gardens, Straits Settlements. 


R. RIDLEY’S book is a practical work intended for 


the use of planters in all parts of the world. 


In it 


the reader will learn about the soils suited for the various 


spices, the diseases from which the plants suffer, the most 


efficacious insecticides and fungicides, the different kinds of 


manure to be used, and indeed everything connected with 


this branch of agriculture. 


VIII. 


MACMILLAN AND 


CONTENTS. 
CHAP. 
. INTRODUCTION, IX. Lone PEPPER, GRAINS OF 
. VANILLA. PARADISE. 
. NutmEcs anp Mace. X. CARDAMOMS. 
XI. Capsicums oR CHILIES, 
. CLOVES. 
XII. Corianper, Dit, Cumin. 
PIMENTO OR ALLSPICE. Et awe 
- CINNAMON, XIV. Turmeric, ZEDOARY, 
. Cassta Bark, Masso1 GALANGAL, AND CALa- 
Bark. MuS Root. 
BLack PEPPERS. APPENDIX. INDEX. 


CO., LTD., LONDON. 


Ready Autumn, 1912. 


8vo. Illustrated. 


SYLVICULTURE IN THE 
TROPICS 


BY 


A. F. BROUN, 


Commander of the Imperial Ottoman Order of the Osmania, 
formerly of the Indian Forest Service, sometime Con- 
servator of Forests, Ceylon, and lately Director of 
Woods and Forests, Sudan Government, 


This work is divided into four parts as follows :— 


Part I. Factors GOVERNING AND INFLUENCING THE 
EXISTENCE OF FORESTS. 


» II. Formation AND REGENERATION OF FORESTS. 
» III. TrainrinG AND IMPROVEMENT OF ForREST CROPS. 
» IV. SpeciaL Measures oF MAINTENANCE AND 


PROTECTION. 
In the Press. 8vo. Illustrated. 
COCOA 


BY 


DR. C. J. J. VAN HALL 


MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. 


BOOKS DEALING WITH EGYPT 


MODERN EGYPT. By THe Eart of Cromer. 


With Portrait and a Map. 2 vols. 8vo. 245. net. I vol. 8vo. 75, 6d, net. 


THE SITUATION IN EGYPT. By Tue Eart oF 


CROMER. 8vo. 1s. net. 


ENGLAND IN THE SUDAN. By Yacous Pasua 


ARTIN. Translated by George Robb, Illustrated. 8vo. 10s, net. 


MACMILLAN’S GUIDE TO EGYPT AND THE 


SUDAN. Sixth Edition. 35 Maps and Plans, 5s. net. 


ISMAILIA. A Narrative of the Expedition to Central 


Africa for the Suppression of the Slave Trade, organized by I-mail, Khedive 
of Egypt. By Sir SAMUEL W. BAKER, M.A., F.R.S. Crown 8vo. 
35. 6d. net. 


THE ALBERT N’YANZA GREAT BASIN OF 


THE NILE AND EXPLORATION OF THE NILE SOURCES. By 
Sirk SAMUEL W. BAKER. Cr. 8vo. 35. 6a. net. 


WORKS ON BOTANY AND 
AGRICULTURE 


THE ORIGIN OF A LAND FLORA, A Theory 


‘based upon the Facts of Alternation. By Pror. F..O. BOWER, Sc.D., 
F.R.S. Illustrated. 8vo. 185. net. 


SOUTHERN (AMERICAN) FIELD CROPS. By 


Pror. B. M. DUGGAR. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. 


PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. By Prof. B. M. Duccar. 


Illustrated. Crown 8vo. 7s. net. 


SOUTHERN (AMERICAN) AGRICULTURE. 


By F. S. EARLE, Illustrated. Crown 8vo. 55, 6d. net. 


TEXT-BOOK OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE. 


By H. A. A. NICHOLLS, M.D., F.L.S. With Illustrations. Crown 
8vo. 65. 


DISEASES OF ECONOMIC PLANTS. By Prof. 


F, L. STEVENS, Ph.D., and J. G. HALL, M.A. Illustrated. Crown 8vo. 
8s, 6d. net. : 
5 


WORKS ON BOTANY AND 
AGRICULTURE continued. 


A TEXT-BOOK OF BOTANY. By Dr. E. 


STRASBURGER, Dr. H. SCHENCK, Dr. LUDWIG YOST, and 
Dr. GEORGE KARSTEN. Fourth English Edition. Revised with the 
Tenth German Elition by Dr. W. H. LANG. With 782 Illustrations, in 
part coloured. Medium 8vo, 18s. net. 


TIMBER AND SOME OF ITS DISEASES, By 
H. MARSHALL WARD, D.Sc., F.R.S., F.L.S. Illustrated. Crown 
8vo. 65. — 


DISEASE IN PLANTS. By Dr. H. Marsuaryt Warp. 


Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. 


TECHNOLOGICAL WORKS 


THE STRUCTURE OF THE COTTON FIBRE 


AND ITS RELATION TO TECHNICAL APPLICATIONS. By F. 
H. BOWMAN, D.Sc. Illustrated. Crown 8vo. 8s. 6d, net. 


THE STRUCTURE OF THE WOOL FIBRE 
AND ITS RELATION TO THE USE OF WOOL FOR TECHNICAL 
PURPOSES. By F. H. BOWMAN, D.Sc. Illustrated. Crown 8vo. 
8s. 6d. net. 


THE MECHANISM OF WEAVING. By Tuomas 


W. FOX. Fourth Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. 


By WILLIAM SCOTT TAGGART. 


COTTON SPINNING. With Illustrations. Second 


Edition. Three vols. Crown 8vo. 


Vol. I. INCLUDING ALL PROCESSES UP TO THE END OF CARDING, 45. net, 

Vol. II. INCLUDING THE PROCESSES UP TO THE END OF FLY-FRAMES. 
4s. net. 

Vol. III. tos. net. 


COTTON MACHINERY SKETCHES. Super Royal 


8vo. Sewed. 2s. 6a. 


COTTON SPINNING CALCULATIONS. _ Illus- 


trated. Crown 8vo. 4s. net. 


MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON. 
6 


eet ea 
Reece SISTER 

Ba ” 

SR : ee : 
REIGN, ae & tates 
RRR RR set ey 

NETS SAN Shy 

RRS eta RTS 

me 


renee 


are 


ES ay 
aa 


o 


PIRES SSN SSIS SDR oa 
PA eutetae DADAM MS * 


ae, 


Beads 
rot 


* 


a 
Papas taronons 
SS 


Rese see Dhecob 


sbebesbe Bane 

Rteseseseievesateres 

BESO node EMD EDEDE DE: 
ener RCH 
Sesh rest se0404) ee 
HH A HO: 

25>: >. oie ee 


Beateses 

eeiesiene 
;: eee 
ieee 


gabe daon ae be>y ies 
SSS Suarees oasueecter se sensaes eeteantcaeeN Saree TSR AAT 
Seenee eaeee Penns 


ees 
4h) 


Pas Pa Pa? 3 DOP ey a? i a 
OTE ee MICE ee eC 
a DSPgDans BORD EDRDSEESL USDA DEOL OL DR OD DEDEDE DERE DLOLDR 
DEPaDabarePararateraPnr rare rareretehaheoe deere ee 
AE AIER sozocnrncaneracnrorarenaonam 
3 gegeetasere Nid id see 
sauder abscess rae 
Pa rsParooaPadaradsy 


165 ie 3 
Kaa Aeaeeee ts 


Para lae 
s! DEPP 
SS SOERDEOSDS ESS PE. DEDEDE PS TEED Se RSTRLEEE 
EDSDEACDEDC ODA REDE eC DA DOBLD Hoey Assi fase gastos 
RS DODL ORDO pepe oDEEOL RRS IH 
tise Le 
s Sater 


ia 


tie ey 
tae ateas ate 
pap gpg nape np mem Brpepabe 
SERRE ie SeSasecaareceisnnits 
Boabgoabaoe RR Kote Pe pRopenetat Rees eat or ae RH Mae 
Neacaesesereieiens DADE SADR cc cpuaeag penchansntae 
ESAS ce aah Saeed aca ee reese taease seer et ia icds 
‘ SESE bebe DE DyDS subpp anh ne DC REDEE 
pe 


75?) ss 

CSA ESCIEOS 

434 Dg nade DED es oe cbene: 
50, PpPoratsrarsost 
apne SSpzpeysasonag pea 

MR MeN NESS 

Sateie ete Pata dsPEredarenar: ee 
Byes eee eaCtaen cater sss ‘5 oes, 

Rass | Kigotage EeSeyeaeneny 
> PPS: 
fSaianseseny 

414) 

ease 


Ey 
Ppa o eee 
pees 


os 


352 
Kx 


ia 


Gd) <a 

pebeoeogpepnespr bebe Denes ie 

eeiqsevee) Races Moca erees 

a aienelennde aid aes tide 
seer Seis 

Seaseeaese i 

Barak sear 


Se ebb: 
Miata 
Hasse 


iterates 


Seid: 


Deotabavete! 
Reet tati yt 


Pe Pahses) 
easaties 


Baie 

pasar 

Bob aebe nk sManpeeepeae 
ret et it: 


iis 


fase 
tests 
4 
iS eee 
(Sas edeoesdFehss 
Deecentiend elit 


a 
exes 


Ste 
aries 


eas 


Deepa Pa be phot azepec ace 
zspeatntes ox alocacarscaeb 
eeSaseoehahses 
ppphpa steno 
peasntceses 


Eeidh¢s 


ane 


a 


eae sense 1e) 
Seleseigien aici 
75732523" 35> 32s! 
CNIS ISIS Ae I aG _ 
2525032 Bearer 
easexeys if i ate eatess 
5 > ¥ sateng 
sestsertct 


are 


Sei 
(Saat en 


ce eStats ee 
Ease Leaseherasese esate i ateereates if 
333395 995295 oops 9009, oo5 2 haba ds Dads py pou osDe az os bneea pea bao! SENS eA ae 
ieee ; : Sees 
easier Crates 5 i} St ets enacted 
Raia inieieidas Sen 
saseieenciasey 
Sea leseseiaees 


oA 


Boe Cs 

Kata on 8 a8 be 

iis Ls 
Be, 


e544 
etna 


Sen 


Hee pian 

ete aaee “ sates Leese ei gia ia eats 

eaSPsPoRUPaSaPao BaP S Rata SRa tenor nSSe¥rs Pelee ca ree Nested eats Seeded aaa fee eeigeeaet 

Poe rgts Pity 7 ae eee aaa oral b ACHC DT Erb N oor geet Sl Ae 
HA Ge Ok hea S 4 Sh tA . eet 
Seseeseid ieee iaies Se siete Massena roebetth 

asec ae aati satatees trachea sentria tgs Santeridt ; sl Batata tohae 

aes ae pe 
Deer es Sea 


es 


Snead 
sao enesenes 
Sted ices 


Peeks 

edetnesd ates hehe tes i ead 
(hath ate sea eee oo elet ray ahehate ose rlegh ry ty. 
SOAK Maa tte ae asthe’ eats east 
Peay Debio a ooo, o>, A or ore ory oe fees Senet seek 
DOO oe oe Sec5 CRAKEAR ices hee 

siete See te hase4 K 

naere atten 

Deira ae Patsth 
moe 


oh si adasieteds 
ines 


oe) i 
ie , 
ant nes Le eons” 
vy Day. 
‘ ieee 


4. anne 

eet 

ts ats 

CO TOSS OSCE RO ros iu pace 
Co Be 2 Se 


Oh 
be 


vey 


a ty ma A Seat ce ane ha i a> 
Pye Pity Bear a ed » a 7% 
Dibba ey aes f 


Sot,