American gardens;

SSanSSe
ae

eect

iy

he

plea

oh Ay

\

aes
tA
ve

bere a
7
eu

Gurnell University Library
Ithaca, New York

BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE

SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND

THE GIFT OF

HENRY W. SAGE

1891

Cornell University

The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.

There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.

http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924061784785

AMERICAN
GARDENS

AMERICAN

GARDENS

Cptted by
GUY LOWELL

BOS ft ON

Bates & Guild Company

MCMII

Copyright, Ig02, by

Bares &¥ .GuILD COMPANY

PHOTO-ENGRAVINGS BY FOLSOM &
SUNERGREN, BOSTON. PRINTED AT
THE UNIVERSITY PRESS, CAMBRIDGE

NOTE
HIE Publishers wish to express their thanks to

the owners who have so courteously allowed
their gardens to be photographed for this book, and
to the architects who have aided in its preparation.
The views in this volume are not to be repro-

duced except by special permission.

INTRODUCTION

HE pleasures of gardening and the enjoyment of the beauties of
nature have been favorite subjects with the writers of all ages, so
that fortunately we have their descriptions by which to trace the
history of the art of gardening; for nature, whether uncon-
trolled, or whether composed and arranged by man, carries

within it the elements of constant change. But although
gardens themselves are not permanent, may be changed, and must, in time, fall into
ruin, each new designer leaves behind him some result as a legacy to those who
follow; and because of this constant evolution it is interesting to trace the in-
fluences that have affected the art of garden design in America.

The gardens. of America necessarily differ from those of other countries,
owing to a different climate, and to different manners and customs from those
which prevailed when the most famous typical gardens of the Old World were
laid out. Indeed the distinctive charm of our native gardens is due to the very
fact that they are adapted to our needs and our surroundings. We have given
them an American character, and yet have preserved many of the elements and
followed many of the principles that have been developed in other lands by
_centuries of garden building. ;

In following the history and tracing the origin of these principles and
elements we must consider the garden as a work created by man. Much of
its charm will always be due to the accidental and the unexpected, but nature
must be influenced or controlled, otherwise, though the effect may be artistic,
the result is not a work of art. When man first attempted to control natural
scenery, to combine flowers, trees, and cultivated fields so as to produce an
esthetic effect, and when he rearranged existing natural forms with a desire to
create new beauties, then gardening became an art. ‘Till that time the gardener
had not ‘necessarily practised the art of gardening; that is to say, his labors
were utilitarian; and it is not utilitarian gardening, except in so far as it may be
combined with the decorative, that we have to consider, but that which tends
to beautify our surroundings and supplements man’s handiwork by adorning it
with the beauties of nature.)

Who the first gardener was we do not know, but we can trace the art
down through the history of civilization, and follow its ‘development as surely
as that of the art of building. The line of descent, if long, is direct, the transi-
tion from cause to effect is easy to follow, and the influences of manners, customs,

and climatic conditions are strong and easily determined. Only a few exam-
ples are needed to show how the art of gardening has steadily progressed in one
direction for centuries, and we shall see at the same time how styles have been
influenced by the necessities of life and by surroundings.

It must, however, be remembered that almost no trace is left of the famous
gardens of antiquity. We know where many of them were situated, we know
the dimensions and some of the details of others, but to gain an idea of their
effect we must always draw largely on our imaginations. Contemporaneous litera-
ture aids us a little; a knowledge of the flora of the country helps us to finish
off the picture; but the whole must in the end be, necessarily, a fabric of the
imagination. |

The formal garden had its beginning many centuries ago. Owing to the
admirable pictorial descriptions of the ancient Egyptians, we have a fairly accu-
rate idea of their gardens six thousand years back. Maspero, in his “ Dawn of
Civilization,” tells about a garden a description of which is carved on the tomb
of Amten, an important Egyptian nobleman who lived four thousand years
before Christ. “He built,” says Maspero, “upon the remainder of the land
a magnificent villa, of which he has considerately left us the description. The
boundary wall formed a square 350 feet on each face, and consequently con-
tained a superficial area of 122,500 square feet. A well-built dwelling-house,
furnished with all the necessaries of life, was surrounded by ornamental and fruit-
bearing trees,—the common palm, the nebek, fig trees, and acacias,—several ponds,
neatly bordered with greenery, afforded a habitat for aquatic birds; trellised vines,
according to custom, ran in front of the house, and two plots of ground planted
with vines in full bearing supplied the owner with wine every year.” |

An interesting drawing, found in a Theban tomb some forty centuries old,
shows, in a curiously combined plan, elevation, and section, a garden almost exactly
like that described above. We can see not only all the parts mentioned in the
earlier account, but can recognize certain trees and plants, see the birds swim-
ming on the ponds, and the vines climbing on the trellises. The whole was
laid out with paths and terraces, so as to afford shade from the hot sun and
shelter from the burning winds; and is an interesting example of the utilitarian
and the decorative garden combined.

The fame of such gardens as these, together with other forms of Egyptian
art, traveled to the neighboring Eastern countries. Not only did the conquerors
often adopt the artistic traditions of a vanquished nation, but commerce, too,
assisted in spreading art. The Assyrians, the Persians, the Pheenicians, and the

Greeks had their gardens also, the building of which increased with the growth
of luxury and diminished with the advent of war.

The Greeks, however, were never great gardeners. Though they had a
thorough appreciation of the charm of nature, when they undertook to bring
order into their landscapes it was always in a formal way; and all their designs
showed the predominance of the straight line or geometrical curve.

On the other hand, the Romans, whose art was derived from Greece, paid
great attention to their gardens, but, like the Greeks, they kept all their lines
geometrical. These Roman gardens, in distinction from the Greek and Egyptian,
were often wholly decorative, with the agricultural and economic features left
out, but with the addition of sculpture, of clipped hedges and trees, together with
greater variety of design. ‘The ellipse and the circle were used in planning, and
the differences in level of the Roman hillsides required the frequent use of terraces,
which in turn necessitated balustrades and steps. The fashion of trimming trees to
make them even more symmetrical than nature had made them, or to make them
look like birds and other animals, had already come in; and gradually, as under the
Empire life grew more luxurious, Roman gardens became more artificial, larger,
and more elaborate, while natural elements disappeared and their place was taken
by sculpture and architecture. Pliny, in his letters, describes two of his villas,
and many attempts have been made to reproduce the surrounding grounds by
means of his-descriptions. With the fall of Rome, the art of gardening slum-
bered, along with all other arts, throughout the Dark Ages.

It is an interesting fact that these classic gardens which we have been con-
‘sidering —and, indeed, nearly all the gardens of which we have any record that
were built before the middle of the eighteenth century — were “formal,” with
their boundaries and principal features laid out along straight lines. ‘The “natu-
ral” style in gardening, which came in later, leaves nature much as it is, or else
attempts to reproduce nature as it exists in some other spot. The principle is,
_that, if possible, no sign of the work of man should appear, or that if it does of
necessity appear it should obtrude itself as little as possible. Therein lies the radi-
cal difference between formal and natural gardening. In a natural scene the road
or path is hidden or planted out, whereas in the formal garden paths are an
important element in the design, and by their contrast with the vegetation form
part of the decorative composition. Each style has had its advocates.

It was at the time of the Italian Renaissance, that the gardens which have
most influenced our modern designs were first built. During the Middle Ages the
European nations were too busy making war, or were too poor to be able to afford

the luxury of garden building. A few orchards and a few patches of herbs or
vegetables were cultivated by monks, but nothing was contributed to the art of
garden design until the beginning of the Renaissance, when the Italians began to
study the classics and the classic form of art. Lorenzo de Medici, as patron of all
the arts in Florence, first gave the impetus to the revival of the classic style. He
made his garden a museum of sculpture and decoration, so that gradually the
grounds became a decorative adjunct to the house; and the great artists of his
time, such as Michelangelo, Giulio Romano, and Raphael, were not satisfied with
designing palaces and decorating them with frescos and carving, but must needs
design the gardens too. In the beginning the gardens they created were like those
of classic Rome, but gradually the greater freedom of the Renaissance manifested
itself, and the villa gardens of Rome and Northern Italy which we know to-day
were the result.

In common with all other great periods of artistic activity, the Italian Renais-
sance reached a climax, followed by a swift degeneration during which exaggera-
tion became the keynote of all designing. In the gardens trees were no longer
allowed to grow in their natural forms, and, as had been the case in the latter
period of Roman art when artistic ideals had degenerated, the architecture became
more important than the vegetation. But fortunately, long before the baroque
period, the art of garden building, together with the other arts, had crossed the
Alps to take a new start, under new conditions and amid different surroundings,
in France. _

One important feature of the Italian gardens had been the terraces, steps,
and ramps, which were necessary in Italy because of the hills on which the villas
were generally built; another had been the ease with which water could be
introduced as an important feature. In France the natural conditions were no
longer the same, and the gardens in consequence were different. The land was
more commonly level, and it became necessary to sink the parterres in order to
get an effect of relief and to have an excuse for terracing, nor could the architects,
for the same reason, use cascades and grottoes in their designs as easily as foun-
tains and basins. Many of the important estates bordered on forests, and a forest
background demanded different treatment from that required when the Roman
Campagna formed the setting. The trees and flowers, as well as the building
materials and incidental architecture, too, were different, so that the French soon
developed a distinct style in garden design.

It was André le Notre, the designer of the park at Versailles and the favorite
landscape gardener of Louis XIV., who, more than any other, was the cause of the

development of a new style. The earlier plans had been, in general, attempts at
direct copies of Italian examples. But the festivities and ceremonies of the court
of Louis XIV. required a magnificence and grandeur in the laying out of grounds
that had not been equaled in Italy, and breadth and: magnificence became the lead-
ing characteristics of Le Noétre’s work. He tried, wherever possible, to tie his
garden to the surrounding landscape, and to give the impression that the forces of
nature had been marshaled and arrayed with ruler and compass rather than that
trees and flowers, sunshine and shade, were elements with which to design. His
work may be classed as half-way between the extremely formal and the landscape

Barden. og ee

It was natural that wherever the fashions of the French Court went, there
Le Notre should be called to lay out gardens. Consequently the French style
spread to England, to Germany, and to the Netherlands, only to become. every-
where modified or altered to suit local conditions. New motives of all kinds
were invented, and formality, pushed to the extreme limits of artificiality, became
the fashion. .

It was not many years before a reaction naturally set in. Addison and Pope
in their ‘writings had already sounded the warning note, and the plea for a more
natural treatment was made. But as the advocates of the natural method in
England gathered force, a bitter discussion arose concerning the respective merits
of the two styles. Many of the really fine old formal gardens were destroyed,
and much was done in the name of naturalness that was highly artificial. But
the new school of “landscape gardeners” flourished, and has produced many of
the finest places in England; while the discussion of the respective merits of the
two styles has continued to the present day.

In this country, the earlier or Colonial gardens were, like the Colonial archi-
tecture, inspired by contemporaneous European examples, although the scale was
smaller, and the results, modified by the social requirements of the people, were
simpler. We know a good deal about the flowers grown, and some of the seeds-
men’s catalogues of the early days of the nineteenth century show what a great
variety was cultivated. We cultivate the same ones to-day, only in more beautiful
and more numerous varieties. The charm of some of these old gardens which >
our grandmothers loved to tend can be seen in the now overgrown gardens —
of New England and the South, shown in the following pages. Perhaps the
most charming quality of such old gardens is their power to call up reminiscences
and pictures of other days.

The landscape of America is, however, so especially well adapted to the ~

natural style of treatment, that for many years the formal garden was forgotten,
though many beautiful country places and parks were laid out. In consequence
there are in America many superb old places that, having had the benefit of good

designing to begin with, have to-day a finished appearance, owing to fine trees”

and perfected details.

In recent years there has been a revival of interest in the formal garden in
this country. Foreign travel may in part account for this, but still more impor-
tant factors are the interest that has sprung up in all that relates to outdoor life,
and the increased desire to improve the outdoor part of the house. As a conse-
quence formal gardens have been created side by side with the natural, and the
discussion of the relative merits of the two styles has been revived on this side
of the Atlantic.

It is a mistake to go so far as to say that but one type of garden, either the
formal or the natural, can be correct, satisfactory, or beautiful. The arguments of
the advocates of either kind for their own favorite style, and their contempt for the
claims of their opponents, seem often like an attempt to bring the principles of
art under the rulings of a well defined code. The contention of the formalist,
that man cannot imitate nature and therefore should not inspire himself from
nature, but should have all his gardens balanced, formal, and symmetrical, is as
unjust as is the dictum of the landscape gardener that nature abhors a straight line,
and that, therefore, straight lines should be avoided or broken. We are given cer-
tain elements with which to deal, certain materials to handle, and there should
be no law to ordain that either every line must be straight and formal or else that
every form should be broken or at least unsymmetrical. It is wholly a, question
of appropriateness and of personal and individual art. Which is the more beauti-
ful, a Greek temple standing out white and calm against the deep blued of th
Mediterranean sky, or a lofty French cathedral with its rich detail and mpndertl
fabric of flying buttresses silhouetted against the cooler and grayer skies of the
North of France? Each represents a style perfect in itself, yet totally different.
There is no need of condemning one in favor of the other; each is appropriate in
its place. It is the appropriate adaptation of the established European principles
of gardening to American surroundings that will perfect an American style.
~——— One of these principles, as we saw in the case of the gardens of the Renais-
sance, was to continue the lines of the house out into the grounds, and thus to
make the garden, as it were, an outdoor room, bounded by hedge and wall in such
a way as to make its proportions pleasing, and decorated not only with trees,
shrubs, and flowers, but with fountains, statues, and vases, which offer a pleasing

*-

contrast to the vegetation. A principle like this is easily transplanted to this
country, for it is so easy to cross the Atlantic nowadays that the influence of for-
eign art can be seen at every turn. Our architecture has heretofore been a copy
of some European style; our painters, sculptors, and musicians study abroad. But
as a nation we have strong individuality, and differences in requirements and in
local. characteristics have modified the ideas on garden design which we have
imported from Europe. It is interesting to analyze how this assimilation of
ideas has taken place.

An American traveling abroad is sure, after seeing the formal gardens of
Rome and of Northern Italy, to wish to reproduce them in some form in his own
country. He does not always remember that climatic conditions are not the
same, and that unless entirely different materials are used and different trees and
flowers planted the result will be a failure. American winters are too severe, at
least in our Northern States, to allow the free use of marbles; delicate carving
and soft stones have either to be protected in winter or must be left out of the
design. Moreover, different flowers, trees, and hedges have to be used in attempt-
ing to produce effects similar to those in Italy, for it is impossible to grow here
many of the broad-leaved evergreens which give so much character to the villa
gardens of Rome. ‘The lines and masses may be similar, the principles of design
may be the same, but ‘the effect in detail is different, for different elements must
be used, or must needs be changed to meet new conditions. When Italian artists
came to France at the time of the French Renaissance they, in the same way, had
to adapt their work to the conditions of climate, — though it does not follow that
because the French and the American formal gardens are the development of the
Italian style in a northern climate, they are or can be similar.

The magnificence and grandeur of the French parks are sure to interest all
students of the art of gardening, and several places in this country have been laid
out in imitation of the French style. But we have already seen that the gardens
of Le Notre belonged to a period of highly elaborate court life, and were inspired
by the fétes and ceremonies of the Grand Monarque. That style of life has
died out in France, and never existed in this country, so that any attempt to
imitate the gardens of Versailles or Saint Cloud would be due to a desire to copy,
rather than to any real social or artistic need for such a garden. Even did the
desire to copy exist, no one who appreciates and enjoys the charm of our Amer-
ican scenery should ever attempt to lay out his grounds like the park at Versailles
unless there were enough acres of natural scenery beyond to make one feel the

dominant note of the American landscape.

The English had their big ceremonial gardens, too, but. when the social
life in England became simpler they still kept up their gardening, modifying the
details to suit circumstances and space. It is from England that we get our best
examples, for the conditions there, social and climatic, are more like those in this
country. But even when we draw inspirations from England we must modify
the planting, for our summer season is shorter, and many of the most useful trees.
and shrubs used in England are not hardy throughout this country.

We may borrow, then, details and ideas from Italy, France, and England, but
we must adapt them skilfully to our own needs, and give them the setting which
they require. @ Our gardens need not, when adapted to this country, follow any
recognized style. » In the first place we are not yet hampered by national traditions
and may take only as much of any one style as happens to please us; secondly,
American vegetation is very different from that of other countries. In spite of the
fact that the same flowers sometimes grow in the American garden as in those
abroad, they seem to grow differently, —less formally, perhaps, and we, as a
nation, prefer a freedom which to the English or the French gardener would
almost seem like untidiness.

Unfortunately it has been impossible to show in this book some of the
many charming “naturally” planned country places in America, because their
beauty is mainly due to situation and to attractive views or else to the successful
creation of a naturalistic landscape. Such scenes are not only impossible to illus-
trate adequately by photographs, but, moreover, though they present examples
of beautiful scenery, they are of no value as examples of garden design. In such
places the garden is simply a part in the whole, although a part capable of being
complete in itself. It has, furthermore, been impossible, for the same reason, to
show some of the American gardens where the flowers serve only as a border in
the natural landscape. In such places, also, the garden is simply a part in the
whole, and is in fact a detail that must follow the same artistic principles as the
more formal garden.

These artistic principles are many of them self-evident, but are none the less
interesting to trace in their relation to the whole problem of garden design.
We shall see how they have been observed in the gardens and their details shown

in the following pages.

The garden in this and other countries is composed of flower beds with
paths or grass plots, often combined with such architectural accessories as garden |
and terrace walls, summer-houses, balustrades, pergolas, vases, statues, fountains, and
gates. Before determining how to compose these different elements, however,

the garden-maker must decide where to compose them,—in other words, he
must first select the best situation for his garden; and this is oftentimes no
easy matter.

If the garden is to be formal, with straight lines or geometrical curves, its
formality must of necessity find some excuse in its surroundings, —a straight road,
a terrace, a wall, or, what is yet simpler, the straight lines of a house. Often
when it would be otherwise difficult to make the house harmonize with the sur-
rounding landscape, the garden, by prolonging the formal lines, softening them
with vegetation, and tying them in with the landscape beyond, perfectly accom-
plishes the desired result. When there is no formal framework, no formal lines
are necessary. One of the most charming gardens in America (though unfor-
tunately not represented in this book because it is of that type which, being
largely dependent upon color, loses almost all its charm in a photograph) is at Bar
Harbor, Maine. With woods for a background and merely an irregular lawn for
a path, it is more charming than any walled or formal garden that could have
been put there; but only an artist could have made it, and it requires the con-
stant care of an artist to keep it up year by year, for none of its elements is per-
manent, and lines and grouping must annually be laid out anew. A garden of
this kind, forming as it does a foreground to the natural scenery beyond, need
not necessarily be in close proximity to the house; in fact, to attempt to make
a garden serve as a foreground to the main vista from the house is often a mis-
take, for the bright colors of the flowers may kill the more delicate tones of a
distant scene, whereas these same rich colors might give decided interest to a
less important view.

The situation of the garden once selected, — when it seems to have been
placed where it will add to the attractiveness of the house or grounds, and where
conditions of soil seem to be satisfactory, or are capable of being made so by
enriching or draining, when questions vof sunlight for the flowers and shelter from
the winds have been settled, — then the problems of size and proportions may
be considered. It would naturally be folly to make a garden so large that its
maintenance and care will become a perennial burden, —=in itself a sufficient
practical reason for planning the garden and the house in proportion to each
other, so that the garden shal] become, as it were, an outdoor room to the house,
larger than any inside because it should give the sense of freedom and of sun-
light and air, but still small in the case of a small house, and proportionately
large in the case of a large one.

The direction of the garden with reference to the house is also important.

The view as seen from the house should, generally speaking, follow the direction
of the garden; that is to say, should be parallel to the long axis rather than at
right angles to it. ‘The full effect of the garden in perspective is thus obtained,
and the whole, composed as a whole, will form one picture, while the charm
of detail is discovered later.

An examination of the sketch plans at the end of this book will show that
the shapes and relative proportions of the various parts may be many. Often these
shapes and proportions are controlled by some predetermined factor ; often they

are merely the result of study. In the more simple gardens, — and the simpler

PLAN OF A GARDEN AT ST. JAMES, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. STANFORD WHITE, ESQ ACHEEEGR
7 ESQ 4 E

they are the better they are apt to be, —the form is usually rectangular, some-
times ending in a half circle or ellipse. A good typical plan is that of the garden
at St. James, Long Island, N.Y., shown on this page. (Compare Plates xrr.,
x1u1., and xiv.) Here, as in many other good examples, there are central paths
and two sets of lateral paths running at right angles to each other. Where such
paths cross in the centre, statues, fountains, sun-dials, basins, or pools may be placed;
or if the garden be long in proportion to its width, the motive may be repeated so
as to form two centres, as, for example, in the garden at Pomfret, Conn., shown
in Plates xxxv. to xxx1x. Frequent subdivisions of the garden beds are necessary,
and a rectangular rather than a curvilinear treatment of them seems to be the
more pleasing, though a charming example of the latter style may be seen in
the garden at New Castle, Del., shown in Plates txxir. and ixxttt.

In combining the various elements of the garden design, they should be so
placed as to form a composition; that is to say, each element should stand in its
proper relation to every other. ‘ An example will show what I mean. In discuss-
ing the difference between (he natural and the formal styles, we saw that in the
formal garden the paths were a part of the decorative design. Suppose, then,
that in some geometrically planned garden a series of parallel paths were to be
separated by strips of grass or by flower beds. If the paths and the grass strips
were made of the same widths throughout, the uniformity would suggest a piece
of striped calico in green and yellow. Not only should there be a difference,
then, in width between the grass and the walks, but there should be a difference
between the widths of the paths themselves. Some one path is sure to be more
important than the others and should therefore be emphasized.

What is true of the paths is true of the other elements of the garden. The
same rules of contrast apply; though the desire for contrast should be at all times
controlled and tempered by the balance of the scheme as a whole. If symmetry
be one of the elements in a design, it would be a mistake, for instance, to plant
one side of a path with Japanese dwarf evergreens, and the other with American
cedars. The two would not harmonize, the balance would be lost, and, owing
to their differences in size, the two kinds of trees would, in their symmetrical
positions, be out of scale with each other.

— To keep the garden “in scale” is one of the most difficult problems with
which a designer has to contend, and is one that requires experience and training.
Shall he crowd many elements into a given space, making the scale small, or shall
he use fewer elements and keep the scale large? It is a matter for individual
choice with each designer; sometimes it is even a matter of individual habit,
for some men always design large, while others always design small.. The char-
acter of the surrounding landscape, whether part of the same estate as the garden
or not, has much to do with the scale; and the size of the building near which
it is to be laid out has, as we have said, even more. The garden of Versailles
laid out beside a New England farm-house would be as inappropriate as a Salem
garden adjoining the Vatican.

The scale of the gardens is determined not only by the relative sizes of paths,
lawns, and flower beds, but also by the proportions of the architectural ornaments.
Sometimes a fragment imported from Europe is set up in surroundings which in
themselves form no fitting frame, and what was admirably suited to some large
Italian villa garden is found to be utterly unsuitable to the surroundings of an
American country house. Unfortunately this disparity in scale is not limited to

fragments that have actually been imported from Europe, but extends to repro-
ductions of architectural detail, originally charming because of their harmonious
settings, yet which fail to produce the same effect in totally different surroundings.
Indeed it is because they exhibit as they do the adaptation and alteration of the
work of other lands to suit our own American surroundings, requirements, and
tastes that makes a study of the illustrations of this book so interesting.

Once erected and complete, a building can be left measurably to itself; and
indeed time will increase its beauties, for time softens and mellows its lines with-
out destroying them. This is not equally true of the garden: age, and age only,
certainly can develop many of its greatest charms, but it will show the effects
of neglect all too rapidly, and a garden requires therefore not only art in him
who designs it, but the constant watchful skill of the gardener who cares for it,
if it is to grow, as it should, perennially more lovely. A landscape gardener
may lay out and design many gardens, but it is not within his power to bring
many to perfection; for when his constructive work is done and the first year’s
planting arranged, he has often to leave the perfecting of his work to the owner,
or to the gardener whom the owner may employ. One who wishes to have a
garden, then, should be prepared to work long and late, and to give it his best
attention, otherwise he will be at the mercy of his gardener’s taste.

The designing of the garden is, of course, only a part of the problem, and
perhaps the part least difficult to accomplish well. The ultimate success or failure
of the result will depend on the proper choice of plants and on their combi-
nations of color. No matter how good the architectural accessories may be,
no matter how perfect the proportions of the garden itself, if the beds be bare
or the colors crude and discordant the garden will lack its chief beauty, for, after
all, a garden is, it should be remembered, primarily a pace in which to grow
flowers; the rest is but the frame.

First and foremost in importance, then, are the flowers; but they should not
be looked on as so many beautiful specimens that need but to be planted to grow
and blossom. The garden ought to be more than a museum of one’s favorite
blooms, where the beauty and fragrance of each may be admired in succession,
but where each, except in some haphazard way, does not contribute to the total
effect of the whole. However beautiful in themselves, the flowers should be con-
sidered as elements in the design, and should be so arranged that, as they succeed
each other all summer long, each shall add to the general composition; that is
to say, to the effectiveness of the garden asa whole, even if it be but by some
tangled, rampant growth. Not only should all the varying combinations of colors,

both of blossoms and foliage, week by week, be foreseen and planned, but the
delicate fresh colors of spring flowers must be so chosen as to harmonize with
such permanent features as gravel walk, garden wall, and house; while the rich
yellows and purples of the autumn-blooming annuals and perennials — sunflowers,
asters, goldenrods, and phloxes — will require an entirely different color scheme.

With a country like our own, which extends through so many degrees of
latitude, the variety of planting that is possible is at once a delight to the traveler
and the despair of him who would write upon methods of gardening ; for though
one country, we have many climates, and advice suited to one section would be
utterly valueless for another. Thus the amateur gardener who designs and
composes his own garden is sure to make mistakes during the first year or two.
Plants that flourished well elsewhere may not find the precise conditions that they
need in the new garden, the time of flowering will vary, the colors will not prove
what the florists promised, so that the combinations of colors will be found dis-
appointing, — all of which will result in extensive weeding during the season.
To design successfully in color demands a power of visualization that is rarely
found in beginners; but loving thought and affectionate and patient tending will,
in the end, create a garden that may serve as an encouragement to all lovers of
flowers. It is unfortunate that the photographs cannot enable us to see how
glorious the colors of some of the gardens represented in this book really are, —
with the white and pink hollyhocks glowing against the dark green of a well-
clipped box hedge in some old-fashioned garden, a sunlit grapevine trailing over
a white trellis, a group of tiger lilies under a hot sun, or the yellow narcissus on
a shaded bank.

Taking up in detail the elements that compose a garden, we shall find
that next in importance to the flowers is the framework or boundary. This may
consist of a building, a garden wall, the edge of a terrace, a hedge, a border of
shrubbery, the edge of a wood, or a sheet of water; for whether the garden be
formal or natural, it should have some boundary. An irregular field of daisies
or a stretch of heather is extremely beautiful, but, according to our use of the
word, is not a garden. Even in the most informal arrangement of flowers, a
background is necessary in places. Walls and hedges should serve, however,
not only as a background, but to give protection from the cold winds, and yet
be low enough to let the sun into the garden all day long, for there will always
be spots where a little shade can be contrived for those plants that especially need
it. If the house is built, or the walks and hedges are already in position, the
garden ought to be so placed as to fulfil these requirements of shelter and sun.

When the garden is to be terraced it becomes one of the most difficult
problems that the designer has to face; for, owing to the great expense of
retaining-walls and balustrades, work cannot be done experimentally, but must
be done right the first time. There are, however, many admirable examples for
the treatment of walls and terraces in England, and especially in Italy, where
the designing of terraces was carried to a state of perfection which has added
much to our command over this architectural detail; and the Italian examples
should be studied on all occasions where terracing is necessary. The various
levels, too, have to be connected by steps and stairways, which in themselves often
form interesting decorative features. We are prone in this country to make our
steps too narrow and our stairways too steep. Out-of-doors, where more space
is available than within, stairs may be given a breadth and treatment that are
impossible in a house; and their ornamental, even more than their utilitarian
character should constantly be borne in mind. The planting on the different
terraces may be divided into garden beds or grass lawns by gravel paths and paved
walks, so as to give variety in detail. The aim should be to avoid too much
monotony in the width of successive terraces, especially where the grade is so
uniform that it becomes expensive to make the various levels vary in width on
account of the large amount of soil that has to be moved. When, however,
marked and abrupt changes in grade occur, it becomes possible to produce most
.interesting results. The garden at Purchase, N.Y. (Plate xciv.), shows an illus-
tration of such terracing. Here the garden is below the terrace on which the
house stands, and is itself well backed up on the west by a high retaining-wall,
and on the east and north by a thick row of trees, while the irregular fringe of
shrubs growing up from below softens what might otherwise be too straight a
line in the framework.

When the beds and grass patches are separated from the paths by box or
some other edging, as is usually the case, the sharp lines so produced should be
softened by a freedom of growth in the flowers, so as to attain not only a rich
but a soft effect. For the same reason all planting should be done with a view
to keeping the beds full throughout the season,—and therein lies one of the
drawbacks of planting roses in the central beds, as several of the following plates
bear witness. When they are at their best there is nothing more attractive than
roses; but the season is so short in this country that a rose bed will be bare
late in the spring and early in the autumn, and is then apt to contrast unpleasantly
with more luxuriant growths. Roses seem to produce better results either when
planted on the outer edge of the plot or by themselves to form a special rose

garden. Such a separate rose garden will give complete satisfaction in its season;
and at other times, when admittedly in a transition stage, it will, being by itself,
break up no composition. Roses, unless they are of the climbing variety, produce
a far better effect, too, when seen from above or else banked up so that each bush
can be readily seen. They grow so tall that they lose much of their effect in a
mass. Other flowers which, like roses, grow so high that they might prevent
one walking through the paths from seeing their humbler brothers behind —
hollyhocks and sunflowers, for instance—should find their place beside the garden
wall, which, covered with vines or serving as a support for fruit trees ex espalier,
will make an excellent background for the taller varieties.

I should not be understood to imply, however, that the garden should only
make a color design in flat patterns; indeed, nothing is more monotonous than
the ‘carpet bedding ”’ style, where plants are set out in formal patterns to remain,
with as few changes as possible, throughout the season. This fashion, in vogue
during the last century, finds its complete expression of bad taste in the attempts
one often sees to reproduce in private gardens certain emblems or pictures by
means of different colored plants. The habit of making intricate designs with
box edging, another relic of the labyrinthine and embroidery-like bedding of
two centuries ago, should also be avoided as belonging to the past.

Paths have sufficient excuse for being if they wander in and out among the
flower beds, follow the line of a terrace, a balustrade, or lead to some flight of
steps. They may, following the inspiration of some vine-shaded terrace at Amalf,
or some half-ruined arbor in an old Nantucket garden, be covered with trellis-
work, so as to form an arbor or pergola.

The pergola may bound the garden on one side, or form a central motive in
the distance. In either case its lines should be carefully studied, for its size and
proportions may have much to do with the scale of the garden. The following
plates show how the pergola may be treated in many different ways. In fact, the
whole end of the garden may take the form of a pavilion or summer-house
combined with a pergola, as in the plan, shown on the following page, of the
garden at “Faulkner Farm,” in Brookline, Mass. (See Plates cvi. to cxir.) This
garden, which prolongs the line of the house in an admirable way, forms, with its
flowers and basins, its terraces and walks, the pleasantest of out-of-door rooms. It
is so near the house that it requires no effort to reach it, and so surrounded that
the charm of seclusion is well preserved.

The arbor, the pergola, and the summer-house have always been the prin-
cipal ornamental architectural features of the garden; but in using them in a

climate like ours we must always remember how comparatively short our Ameri-
can summer is, and how bare and out of place they are apt to look during the
winter months. Indeed, in laying out suburban places or in planning houses that are
to be lived in the year round, we are too apt to forget the long months when the
basins will be frozen over, the sun-dial covered with snow, the statues boxed up,
and the garden beds nothing but brown patches. To any one who loves the
country the winter aspect of trees and shrubs will always have great charm. The

BROOK LINE-MASS~ t
[HON-CHARLES-PSPRAGUE: |
PLAN OF: GROUNDS:SURROUNDING ~ r

eresmen = HIS: HOUSE ont

ry = :
PLAN OF FAULKNER FARM, BROOKLINE, CHARLES A. PLATT, ESQ., ARCHITECT.

network of limbs and twigs of the trees against the sky, and the soft coloring of
the young branches of both trees and shrubs are important elements in the
beauty of a natural winter scene; but in a formal garden these same trees and
shrubs, when denuded of their leaves, serve only to accentuate the bareness of the
garden itself. There can be no doubt that, despite the summer charms of the
formal garden, the natural style appears better in our climate in winter, and that,
therefore, a formal garden will give its greatest satisfaction only when it is built
in connection with a house that is to be principally used in summer.

The opportunity to introduce such elaborate fountains and combinations of
pools and cascades as are seen abroad does not often occur in this country; and
where water is used, some regard must generally be paid to the presence of the

water-meter. A pool or basin of standing water, as in the old Egyptian gardens,
will, however, serve to grow aquatic plants, and to add that touch of life to the
scene which can best be given by the reflections from the surface of a pool.
Indeed, the charming effects that can be obtained at comparatively slight expense
by the judicious use of a small basin make water one of the most useful accessories
of the garden.

Of the other architectural ornaments of the garden, little need be said
except that they should be, if possible, beautiful, — at any rate, well designed,
—and that they should be in scale with the garden. No imitation of more expen-
sive materials by cheaper ones should be permitted, because, even though the
counterfeit may not be apparent from a distance, a nearer view will detect the
sham. Marble should be marble, stucco should look like stucco, and wood should
pretend to be nothing better than wood. The solidity of the stucco columns at
“Stratford Lodge,” Bryn Mawr, Penn. (Plates 1., 11., and 111.), for instance, shows
that they make no pretence of being marble. It is perfectly possible to build,
as our ancestors did, interesting wooden pergolas and balustrades, which owe their
attractiveness to the fact that they are delicate in line and in mass in a way that
would be impossible in marble. There are limitations to any one material, of
course; but a study of the following plates will show that no matter what the
material be, so long as it is properly used, or no matter how slender the owner’s
purse, an attractive garden can still be contrived. Indeed, several of the gardens
illustrated were built by their owners without the assistance of any skilled work-
men, and many of them are planted and brought to a state of perfection, year after
year, by the owners themselves. It is, after all, the feeling of ownership that is
one of the greatest pleasures of gardening, ownership not only of the ground
where the flowers grow, but ownership of the design according to which they
have been planted, and therefore ownership of the resulting: beauty. —

—— - We shall find that the special elements of beauty in the best and most chap
acteristic of our American gardens are simplicity of line, harmony of form and
color, and richness in the details of planting. The judicious study of the best
examples of this and other countries, the aim to keep within the limits set by
one’s surroundings and one’s purse, and above all the patience born of a love for
flowers, will make possible a garden which may be a well-spring of delight, even

to him who owns the smallest plot of land. There is no spot so small that
cannot bring forth a few flowers, no rock so barren that it cannot be made to

bloom,

GUY LOWELL.

ILLUSTRATIONS —

PLATE I

“Swartiniore Lodge”

BRYN MAWR, PENN.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE LOWER LEVEL

PLATE II

“Swarthnoore Lodge”

BRYN MAWR, PENN.

1 THROUGH THE PERGOLA
2 THE GARDEN WELL

3 INSIDE THE UPPER GARDEN

4 INSIDE THE UPPER GARDEN

“Swarthnatare Longe”

BRYN MAWR, PENN.

1 THE LOWER GARDEN
2 THE UPPER GARDEN FROM BELOW

ae - Sy

“The Gubernar’s Garver”
MILTON, MASS.

FROM THE CENTRE OF THE GARDEN

ibe

PLATE V BY

“The Gabernor’s Garver”

THE CENTRE PATH

MILTON, MASS.

PLATE VI

“The Gubernor’s Garden”

MILTON, MASS.

1 THE END OF A SIDE PATH
2 LOOKING TOWARD THE ORCHARD
3 THE LOWER PATH
4 THE SOUTH WALK

PLATE BY

“The Gobernor’s Garden”

MILTON, MASS.

THROUGH THE GRAPE ARBOR

ce;

PLATE VIII

“Wonvlea”

SCARBOROUGH, N.Y.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE TERRACE
2 THE FOUNTAIN

ee PLATE 1X
“Wouvlea”
SCARBOROUGH, N.Y.

1 FROM THE TERRACE STEPS

2 FOUNTAIN AND PERGOLA FROM THE NORTH

*

PLATE X

“Monnlea”

SCARBOROUGH, N.Y.

1 AN ITALIAN WELL-HEAD

2 A BED OF EVERGREENS

PLATE XI

“oly Carroll Garvew”

ANNAPOLIS, MD.

THE UPPER TERRACE

al

PLATE XII

A GARDEN AT

St, Samues, N,V,

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE
2 THE FOUNTAIN

PLATE XIII

A GARDEN AT

St, Sanies, 2, B,

1 BETWEEN THE LAWN AND THE GARDEN
2 THE PERGOLA

PLATE XIV —
A GARDEN AT
St, Saures, 2, B.

1 THE PERGOLA
2 THE HERMZE

is

sy! yn

PLATE XV

“Aspet”

CORNISH, N. H.

1 A SEAT IN THE LILY GARDEN
2 THE LILY GARDEN

PLATE XVI

‘“ Aspet”

CORNISH, N. H.

1 THE FOUNTAIN BASIN FROM THE FRONT
2 THE FOUNTAIN BASIN FROM THE REAR

PLATE XVII

“Poow Potwt’’

DUBLIN, N.H.

GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

"Pee ees

PLATE XVIII

“‘Puow Potwt’’
DUBLIN, N.H.

1 THE CENTRE PATH
2 UNDER THE GRAPE ARBOR

PLATE XIX

GLIMPSES OF GARDENS IN

Salem, Mass,

1 A GARDEN ON WASHINGTON SQUARE
2 A GARDEN ON BARTON SQUARE
3 ENTRANCE TO THE “OLD NICHOLS GARDEN”
4 A CORNER IN A SUMMER STREET GARDEN

PLATE XX

“Auldwoor”

SEABRIGHT, N. J.

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN
2 THE GARDEN FROM THE TERRACE

“Auldwood”

SEABRIGHT, N. J.

1 THE JAPANESE FOUNTAIN
2A SIDE PATH
3 THE TERRACE FROM THE GARDEN HOUSE
4 EAST CORNER OF THE GARDEN

PLATE XXII

“Qulywood”

SEABRIGHT, N.J.

1 THE CENTRE OF THE GARDEN
2 THE GARDEN GATE

PLATE XXIII Sy

“The OlV Lav Garden”

THE BEEHIVE .

PORTSMOUTH, N. H.

0B)
wi?

vi
Nd

ee

iy

a a SY

A GARDEN AT

Curnish, 2, Bw,

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE

2 LOOKING TOWARD THE HOUSE

PLATE XXV

“Satvacres”

JENKINTOWN, PENN.

THE CENTRE CROSS-PATH

f

PLATE XXVI

“Satvacrves”
JENKINTOWN, PENN.

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN
2 LOOKING DOWN THE GARDEN
“ 3 LOOKING UP THE GARDEN
4 THE LOWER END OF THE GARDEN

SRO WE =. aE:

PLATE XXVII1

“W@W pe’’

WYE RIVER, MD.

1 THE FLOWER GARDEN
2 THE ORANGERY

PLATE XXVIII

“Wipe”

WYE RIVER, MD.

1 AN OVERGROWN PATH
2“ LOVERS’ WALK”

PLATE XXIX

“Bellefantatine’’
LENOX, MASS.

1 THE WATER GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE

2 THE WATER GARDEN LOOKING TOWARD
THE HOUSE

PLATE XXX

“Bellefontaine”
LENOX, MASS.

THE FAUN FOUNTAIN

=e

PLATE XXXI

“Bellefantative”’
LENOX, MASS.

_ 1 STEPS TO THE EAST FLOWER GARDEN

s Eo is ot
2 THE FAUN FOUNTAIN FROM THE LOWER
TERRACE

PLATE XXXII

A GARDEN AT

Lrbington-on-HuTson, H, VB,

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE TERRACE
2STEPS TO THE TERRACE

PLATE XXXIII sy)

A GARDEN AT
Lrbingtun-on-Wurson, H. VB,

1 FROM “THE CENTRE OF THE GARDEN

2 A SHELTERED FOUNTAIN

PLATE XXXIV

“ Shirley”

JAMES RIVER, VA.

1 A NEGLECTED PATH
2 A BOX-HEDGED WALK

PLATE XXXV coe

“Glen Elstuore’”’
POMFRET, CONN.

THE CENTRE OF THE GARDEN

Ca —
“Glen Elsinore”

POMFRET, CONN.

1 GENERAL VIEW FROM THE UPPER TERRACE

2 LOOKING TOWARD THE UPPER TERRACE

“Glew Elstwore”’
POMERET, CONN.

1 THE CASINO

2 THE SOUTH CORNER OF THE GARDEN

PLATE XXXVIII

“Glew Elstuare’’
POMFRET, CONN.

THROUGH THE COLONNADE

aN
7

wie

PLATE XXXIX

“Glew Elstnore”’
POMFRET, CONN.

1 THE WEST SIDE PATH
2 THE END OF THE WEST SIDE PATH

e— PLATE XL
“Glen Elstuore”

POMFRET, CONN.

1 ALONG THE UPPER TERRACE
2 SOUTHEAST END OF THE GARDEN

A

:
ug
he lg

iow

PLATE XLI

46 Wyck ”

GERMANTOWN, PENN.

1 THE GARDEN
2 THE VINE-COVERED PORCH

PLATE Sy)

“The Garth’

STRAFFORD, PENN.

THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE

yy aet
ah abe

Pa
at

»

PLATE XLIII

“Ohe Garth”

STRAFFORD, PENN.

1 ASIDE PATH
2 THROUGH THE PERGOLA

PLATE XLIV

‘‘Rofalltow”
SEABRIGHT, N. J.

L“PAN OF ROHALLION"™
2 THE SAND GARDEN

PLATE XLV

“Brandon”
JAMES RIVER, VA.

1 THE HOUSE FROM THE LAWN
2 A BOX-BORDERED WALK

PLATE XLVI

“Brandon”
JAMES RIVER, VA.

1 THE GRASS WALK TO THE RIVER
2 ALONG THE HOUSE FRONT

%

MAAS AD
TIL TUTTE

ee PLATE XLVII ey

“Green Bul”

BROOKLINE, MASS.

LOOKING THROUGH THE PERGOLA

sf

Bee

YUVA
-acae!
2 ‘1061 ‘1HOIN
6b A.
oe doo

— PLATE XLVI |

Green Bil”
BROOKLINE, MASS.
1 LOOKING THROUGH THE PERGOLA

"2 A SEAT UNDER THE VINES
3 LOOKING THROUGH THE PERGOLA

c 4 THE JAPANESE WATER-GARDEN

"374 AS L06L SLHOINAGOD

= Wad

PLATE XLIX

“Green Wtll”

BROOKLINE, MASS.

THE JAPANESE WATER-GARDEN

MYVW “3 ‘LAG ‘inal SiHOINAdOD.

PLATE L

A GARDEN AT

Cold Spring Warbor, N, PB.

1 THE GARDEN LOOKING TOWARD THE HOUSE

2 THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE

PLATE LI

A GARDEN AT

Salem, Mass,

1 THE WEST. CORNER OF THE GARDEN
2 BY THE SUMMER-HOUSE

PLATE LII

“Hilltop”

PETERBOROUGH, N.H.

FROM THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARDEN

PLATE LIII

“willtop”

PETERBOROUGH, N.H.

1 THE GARDEN SEAT
2 THE CENTRE PATH
3 ENTRANCE TO THE GARDEN
4 OUTSIDE THE GARDEN

PLATE LIV

“Drumthwacket”

PRINCETON, N. J.

1 LOOKING EAST DOWN THE GARDEN
' 9.THE WEST END OF THE GARDEN

PLATE LV

A GARDEN AT

Roval, Pew.

a A SIDE PATH

PLATE LVI

A GARDEN AT

Roval, Perm,

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

2 LOOKING TOWARD THE HOUSE

PLATE oY

A GARDEN AT

Rydal, Derr,

THE LILY POOL

PLATE LVIII

“FnVtan Warbor”’
GREENWICH, CONN.

1 THE WEST SHORE LOOKING NORTH
2 THE WEST SHORE LOOKING SOUTH

PLATE LIX

“Tnvtan Harbor”
GREENWICH, CONN.

1 STAIRWAY FROM THE BOAT LANDING
* 2 LOOKING UP THE PERGOLA

a =)

—“Entan Parbor”’
GREENWICH, CONN.

THE PERGOLA FROM THE PORTICO

PLATE LXI

“Envtan Harbor”
GREENWICH, CONN.

1 THE FLOWER GARDEN
2 THE FLOWER GARDEN

PLATE LXII

A GARDEN AT

Goruish, 2, wb,

1 BEFORE THE HOUSE
2 A TERRACED PATH

PLATE LXIII

A GARDEN AT

Beberip, Mass,

GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

ich \
BM

44 ‘all tol ras

PLATE LXIV

A GARDEN AT

Beberly, Mass.

1 THE LOWER TERRACE
2 THE FOUNTAIN BASIN

PLATE LXV

.

A GARDEN AT

Beberip, Mass,

1 THE FOUNTAIN-BASIN
2STEPS TO THE RAISED TERRACE

JPM
A ;

PLATE LXVI

“A@psqarth”

ABINGTON, PENN.

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN
2 THROUGH THE GRAPE ARBOR

PLATE LXVII

“Oly Place”

BROOKLINE, MASS.

IN THE WILD ‘GARDEN

PLATE LXVIII

“@illa Rarcault”

MONTCLAIR, N. J.

1 THE GARDEN FRONT OF THE HOUSE
“2 THE GARDEN FROM THE PORCH

PLATE LXIx

“Gilla Parcault”

MONTCLAIR, N. J.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE PORCH
2 THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARDEN

PLATE LXxX

“Willa Narcault”’

MONTCLAIR, N. J.

1 GATE TO THE STABLE YARD
2 THE SUN-DIAL

PLATE LXXI-

“The Farm”

DANVERS, MASS.

LOOKING DOWN THE GARDEN

PLATE pe! SSS)

“The Reavy Garden”

NEW CASTLE, DEL.

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN
2 THE SIDE PATH

PLATE LXXIII

“The Reav Garven”

NEW CASTLE, DEL.

LOOKING TOWARD: THE HOUSE

» PLATE LXXIV

“Ashtary”’

BELLE HAVEN, CONN.

1 THE HOUSE COURT
2 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

PLATE LXXV

“Ashfory”’

BELLE HAVEN, CONN.

1 ON THE FIRST TERRACE
“2 A VINE-COVERED ARCH
3 THE HOUSE COURT
4 THE DESCENT.TO THE GARDEN

IN

Tih

ANI

ae

PLATE LXXVI

GLIMPSES OF

Two South Carolina Garvens |

1 “MIDDLETON PLACE.” A RUINED
GARDEN WALK

2 ‘*DRAYTON HALL.” THE MAGNOLIA GARDEN

PLATE LXXVII

“Pongeratt”
MAMARONECK, N. Y.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE TERRACE
2 THE HOUSE TERRACES

PLATE LXXVIII

“Pongeraft”
MAMARONECK, N. Y.

1 THE CORNER OF THE TERRACE
2 ALONG THE UPPER TERRACE
i

PLATE LXXIX

A GARDEN AT

Cornish, 2. w.

IN THE FLOWER GARDEN

)

i

y

Si
Se Ih

1%

Ke a
[ j

PLATE LXXxX

A GARDEN AT

Curnish, 2. w.

1 THE SOUTH PATH
2 LOOKING FROM THE TERRACE

“Cunstitution Hill”

PRINCETON, N. J.

1 THE FOUNTAIN
2 BIRD’S-EYE VIEW

‘PLATE LXXXI SY

.;

PLATE LXXXII.

“SDrandpwine farn”
- LENAPE, PENN.

THE GARDEN FROM THE HOUSE

adi

PLATE LXXXIII

A GARDEN AT

Stockbridge, Mass,

1 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN
2 GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

PLATE LXXXIV

- A GARDEN AT

Stockbridge, Mags,

1 THE GARDEN SEAT
2 ENTRANCE TO THE WILD PATH

(oS LXXXV

A GARDEN AT

Wellesley, Mass,

THE ITALIAN GARDEN

(See

YK

| oe
——

PLATE LXXXVI

“@evar Court”
- MORRISTOWN, N. J.

1 THE COURT
2 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE COURT

PLATE LXXXVII

“evar Court”
MORRISTOWN, N. J.

1 THE FOUNTAIN BASIN
2 THE WEST END OF THE PERGOLA

PLATE LXXXVIII

A GARDEN AT

Annapolis, My,

1 THE GRAPE ARBOR
2 AN OVERGROWN CORNER

A GARDEN AT

Bernarvsvtlle, R, DB.

GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

PLATE ee Sey)

=

A GARDEN AT

Bernarvsbhille, N. DB,

1 THE BASIN .

2 ON THE MIDDLE TERRACE a

Two Colonial Garvew Gates

1 “THE OLD SANFORD GARDEN,” NANTUCKET,

. = MASS,

2 A GARDEN AT PORTSMOUTH, N.H.

PLATE XCII

“gMastlanys”’

CORNISH, ‘N. H.

1 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE GARDEN
2 THE CENTRE OF THE GARDEN

PLATE XCIII

“Rita Pause’
NEWPORT, R.I.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE TERRACE
2 THE TERRACE

PLATE XCIV

«

“Ophtr Farm”

_ PURCHASE, N. Y.

GENERAL VIEW OF THE GARDEN

PLATE XCV

A Massachusetts.
and a Pewnsplhantia Garver

1 A GARDEN AT BEVERLY, MASS.
THE FOUNTAIN
2 “SEVENOAKS,” UPSAL, PENN,
THE SQUARE GARDEN

PLATE XCVI

“Nauntkeag”
STOCKBRIDGE, MASS.

1 THE GARDEN FROM THE TERRACE
2 ALONG THE TERRACE

PLATE XCVII

“Ellis Court”

BERNARDSVILLE, N. J.

THE LOWER GARDEN

PLATE XCVIII

“Ellis Court”

BERNARDSVILLE, N. J.

1 THE UPPER GARDEN LOOKING TOWARD THE
VERANDA

2 THE UPPER GARDEN FROM THE VERANDA

PLATE XCIX

A GARDEN AT

Salem, Mass,

1 THE SUMMER-HOUSE
2 A GARDEN SHELTER
3 BOX-HEDGED BEDS
4 A WINDING PATH

PLATE C

“Chtelten”

RYDAL, PENN.

LOOKING DOWN THE CENTRE PATH

PLATE Cl SS

“Chelten”

RYDAL, PENN.

1 THE CROSS PATH
2 ACROSS THE LOWER END OF THE GARDEN
3 A CORNER GARDEN HOUSE

4 ACROSS THE UPPER END OF THE GARDEN 2

PLATE Cil

Two Pennsplbanta Gardens

1 ‘*PEMBROKE,” BRYN MAWR, PENN,
THE GARDEN ENTRANCE

2 “THE GRANGE,” OVERBROOK, PENN..
A SHELTERED CORNER

re cod

PLATE CIII

“Washingtows Garden”

MT. VERNON, VA.

1 BOX-EDGED BEDS~ ;
2 A CORNER BY THE SLAVE QUARTERS

PLATE CIV

“Washington’s Garden”

MT. VERNON, VA.

1 THE WEST CORNER OF THE GARDEN
2 THE LONG PATH FROM THE SCHOOL-HOUSE

} PLATE oY

“Washingtaw’s Garvew”

MT. VERNON, VA.

1 HOLLYHOCKS
2 THE ROSE GARDEN

BS PLATE OV

“pspaulkuer farm”
BROOKLINE, MASS.

THE GARDEN FROM THE CASINO

ae

PLATE CVII

“Faulkner Farm”
BROOKLINE, MASS.

1A BIRD’S-EYE VIEW
2 ACROSS THE GARDEN

ibe

PLATE CVIII

“Ffaulkhuer Fara’
BROOKLINE, MASS.

1 END OF THE CASINO PERGOLA
2 THE POOL

= a =

La RORY
ets 4
meat

PLATE CIX

“Ffaulkoer Hara’
BROOKLINE, MASS.

1 ENTRANCE TO THE TERRACES
2 STEPS TO THE CASINO
3 SIDE WALK LOOKING TOWARD THE PERGOLA
4 SIDE WALK LOOKING FROM THE “PERGOLA

PLATE CX

“faulkier Harn’
BROOKLINE, MASS.

1 A CORNER OF THE UPPER TERRACE
2 END OF THE CASINO PERGOLA ~~

3 STEPS TO THE UPPER TERRACE

4 THE TERRACE WALL

PLATE CXI

“Saulkuer SHaraw”’
BROOKLINE, MASS.

1 THE UPPER TERRACE
2 A CORNER OF THE GARDEN

= ey

“faulkwer Harm”

BROOKLINE, MASS.

THE CASINO

A ROVE

INDEX

IN DE Xx

NOTE.—The sketch plans contained in this Index make no pretence to exact accuracy of.
dimensions or detail. They are merely intended to show the general arrangements -of the gardens
they represent, and to indicate the points from which the views on the foregoing pages were photo-

graphed. The italic letter following the title of a view refers to a correspondingly lettered arrow
on the plan which shows the position and pointing of the camera.

“Swarthmore Lovge,” Bron Mawr, Pern. Prate VI. 1 The End of a Side Path d

5 Messrs. KEEN & MeEap, Architects Pirate VI. 2 Looking toward the Orchard e
Pirate VI. 3 The Lower Path f
Pirate VI. 4 The South Walk g

Pirate VII. Through the Grape Arbor 4

| “ WAoovlea,” Scarborough, N. ¥.

Messrs. OLMSTED, OLMSTED, & Exior, Architects

Pirate I. The Garden from the Lower Level a

Prare II. 1 Through the PePgola d
Piate II. 2 The Garden Well ¢
Pirate II. 3 Inside the Upper Garden f

Prate II. 4 Inside the Upper Garden g . SP wg B Sage aS
* ; Saas Cat GaRy =
Pirate III. 1 The Lower Garden b 4 : Z ae

‘Prats III]. 2 The Upper Garden from below ¢

“ape Governor's Garven,” Plilton, Pass.

Pirate VIII. 1 The Garden from the Terrace a
Pirate VIII. 2 The Fountain 4

Prats IX. 1 From the Terrace Steps ¢
“ Prare IX! 2 Fountain and Pergola from the
North d

Pirate X. 1 An Italian Well-head ¢
Prarze X. 2 A Bed of Evergreéns f —

Prate IV. From the centre of the Garden a “Oly Carroll Garven,” Annapolis, Prv.
Prate V. The Centre Path ¢ Pirate XI. The Upper Terrace

A Garven at St. James, N. ¥.

Mr. STANFORD WHITE, Architect

Pirare XII. 1 The Garden from the House a
Pirate XII. 2 The Fountain 4

Pirate XIII. 1 Between the Lawn And the
Garden ¢

Prate XIII. 2 The Pergola d

Prate XIV. 1 The Pergola e
Pirate XIV. 2 The Herme f

“Aspet,” Cornish, N.H. >

Prare XV. 1 A Seat in the Lily Garden c

Prate XV. 2 The Lily Garden d

Pirate XVI. 1 The Ponte Basin from the
Front a

Prare XVI. 2 The Fountain Basin from the

Rear 4

“Poon Point,’ Dublin, N. WH.

a

a i er ee

General View of the Garden a

Prate XVII.

1 The Central Path c
2 Under the Grape Arbor 4

Pirate XVIII.
Pirate XVIII.

Glimpses of Gardens tn Salem, Plass.
Pirate XIX. 1 A Garden on Washington Square

Pirate XIX. 2 A Garden on Barton Square .
Pirate XIX. 3 Entrance to the “Old Nichols
Garden ”

Prate XIX. 4 A Corner in a Summer Street

Garden

“Aulywood,” Seabright, N. J.

Messrs. F. L. OLMsreD @ Company, Architects

s Sots
rae ¢

Anan ee gee
moot sore Ne

aCe SES ig (GF

SSeS Se aa

1 General View of the Garden a
2 The Garden from the Terrace 4

PLaTre XX,
Prats XX.

Prare XXI. 1 The Japanese Fountain c.

Pirate XXI. 2 A Side Path d

Prate XXI. 3 The Terrace from the Garden’
House e¢

PLrate XXI. 4 East Corner of the oe

Prate XXII. 1 The Centre of fhe Garden &

Pirate XXII. 2 The Garden Gate 4

ea

FT

“The OW Lavy Gavven,” Portamouth,/

ND. |!

Pirate XXIII. The Beehive

A Garven at Cornish, Neg. 4).

et hi

ise ta es s

‘

“Ave,” Ave River, Pav.

or eagreaianes cone ee ees

oe
eS

eee aa

Pirate XXVII.
Plate XXVII.

1 The Flower Garden a
2 The Orangery 4

1 An Overgrown Path c
2 “Lovers? Walk” d

Pirate XXVIII.
Pirate XXVIII.

“Bellefontaine,” Lenor, Pass.

Messrs. CARRERE & Hastincs, Architects

Pirate XXIV. 1 The Garden from the House a
Pirate XXIV. 2 Looking toward the House 4

“ Faivacres,” Henkintown, Pernt.

Mr. Wi1son Eyre, Jr., Architect

PLatE XXV. The Centre Cross Path a

PLATE XXVI. 1 General View of the Garden 6
Pirate XXVI. 2 Looking Down the Garden ¢
Prate XXVI. 3 Looking Up the Garden d
Prats XXVI. 4 The Lower End ofthe Garden ¢

b

t The Water Garden from the
House b

Pirate XXIX.

’

Prare XXIX. 2 The Water Garden looking
toward the House ¢

Pratre XXX. The Faun Fountain a

Prate XXXI. 1 Steps to the East Flower
Garden d
Prate XXXI.

Lower Terrace ¢

A Garden at Lrbvington-on-Wurson, N. ¥X.
Mr. A. J. Mannine, Architect

1 The Garden from the Ter-
race @

Pirate XXXII. 2 Steps to the Terrace

[This view was taken previous to a change in the
arrangement of the garden as it is shown in the plan.]

PLate XXXII.

1 From the Centre of the
Garden 5
2 A Sheltered Fountain c

Prate XXXIII.

PLATE XXXII.

“Shirley,” Hames River, Va.

Prate XXXIV. 1 A Neglected Path a

2 The Faun Fountain from the

-Prate XXXVIII.

Prate XXXIV. 2 A Box-hedged Walk /

“Glen Glsinore,” Pomfret, Conn.
Mr. Cuarues A. Piatt, Architect

Pirate XXXV. The Centre of the Garden p

Pirate XXXVI. 1 General View from the Upper

; ; Terrace e
Prate XXXVI. 2 Looking toward the Upper
Terrace f

I The Casino ¢
2 The South Corner of the
Garden d

Through the Colonnade @

Pirate XXXVII.
Prate XXXVII.

Pirate XXXIX.
PLrate XXXIX.

1 The West Side Path g
2 The End of the West Side
Path %

Pirate XL. 1 Along the Upper Terrace 7
Pirate XL.’ 2 Southeast End of the Garden j

“OA peck,” Germantown, Wer.

Pirate XLI. 1 The Garden
Pirate XLI. 2 The Vine-covered Porch

“he Garth,” Strafford, Pen.

Mr. Wixson Eyre, Jr., Architect -

Prare XLII. The Garden from the House a

Pirate XLIII.
Pirate XLIII.

1 A Side Path 4
2 Through the Pergola c

“Mohallion,” Seabright, N. J.

Messrs.) McKim, Meap @& Wuire and Mr. NaTHAN
Barrett, Architects ;

Pirate XLIV. 1 ‘Pan of Rohallion” 2
Pirate XLIV. 2 The Sand Garden 4

“Branvon,” Hawes River, Va.

PLrate XLV.
PLratre XLV.

1 The House from the Lawn.a
2 A Box-bordered Walk 4

Pratz XLVI. 1 The Grass Walk to the River c
Prare XLVI. 2 Along the House Front d@

“Green Hill,” Brookline, Pass.

Pirate XLVII. Looking through the Pergola

Pirate XLVIII.
Prate XLVIIL.
Pirate XLVIII.
Pirate XLVIII.

1 Looking through the Pergola
2 A Seat under the Vines

3. Looking through the Pergola
4 The Japanese Water Garden

Pirate XLIX. The Japanese Water Garden

A Gavven at Coly Spring Warvor, ‘N. ¥.

Messrs. CarRERE @ Hastines, Architects

Prate L. 1 The Garden looking toward the
House a

Pirate L. 2 The Garden from the House 5

A Garden at Salem, Pass.

Prate LI.
Pirate LI.

1 The West Corner of the Garden a
2 By the Summer-house 6

“Hilltop,” Peterborough, N. BH.

Mr. CuHarues A. Piatt, Architect

PLATE ae From the East Side of the Garden a

Prate LIII. 1 The Garden Seat 5
Pirate LIII. 2 The Centre Pathe |
Prare LIII. 3 Entrance to the Garden d
Prate LILI. 4 Outside the Garden

“Prumthwacket,” Princeton, N. H.

Mr. Braprorp L, GiLBerT and Mr. DaniEL W. Lancrton,
Architects

Prate LIV. 1 Looking East down the Garden a
' Prare LIV. 2 The West End of the Garden d

A Garven at Ryval, Penn.

Mr, Witson Eyre, Jr., Architect

Pirate LV. A Side Path a

Pirate LVI. 1 General View of the Garden ¢
Prate LVI. 2 Looking toward the House d

Pirate LVII. The Lily Pool 4

“Fuvian Marbor,” Greenwich, Cont.

Messrs. CARRERE & Hastincs, Architects

Prats LVIII. 1 The West Shore looking’
. a? North 5
\ Pirate LVIII. 2 The West Shore looking
“Oa “= South ¢

Pirate LIX. 1 Stairway from the Boat Landing f
Prate LIX. 2 Looking up the Pergola g

PLrate LX. The Pergola from the Portico a4

Prate LXI. 1 The Flower Garden d
Pirate LXI. 2 The Flower Garden e

Pratre LXII. 1 Before the House a
Pirate LXIT. 2 A Terraced Path 4

A Garvew at Beverly, Pass. “Oly Place,” Brookline, Plass.

Messrs. LirrLte & Browne, Architects Pirate LXVII. In the Wild Garden

“Dilla Narcault,” Montclair, N. FH.

Mr. Cuares A. Piatt, Architect

Le) eet

Pirate LXIII. General View of the Garden a

Prate LXIV. 1 The Lower Terrace d

Pirate LXIV. 2 The Fountain Basin e PLate LXVIII. 1 The Garden Front of the
House a
Prare LXV. 1 The Fountain Basin 4 Pirate LXVIII. 2 TheGarden from the Porch 4

PLate LXV. 2 Steps to the Raised Terrace c

Pirate LXIX. 1 The Garden from the Porch ¢
Pirate LXIX. 2 The Entrance to the Garden d
“Apsgarth,” Abington, Penn.
Prate LXX. 1 Gate to the Stable Yard e
Prate LXX. 2 The Sun-dial f

“The Farm,” Danvers, Pass.

3 eS
Lrg &

PON

hy edie S GLE ;
iN ay NY |
Hey 3 g
fi ies f
: GF

usar a ver 43 a, "t an : bo q
7G SD) 4 (oee8 3 4 . i = Sie ue : iH.
hg Be aa van. = fea Aas ral ah Ee nee yey

a

cai” ay 4
oy

3

2 Stee ie oo we cS
<8 ae

‘az
Ej

ge’ mek
4

— LXVI. 1 General View of the Garden a |
‘PLATE LXVI. 2 Through the Grape Arbor 4 Pirate LXXI. Looking down the Garden a

“The Reavy Garven,” New Castle, Del. “Bongcroft,” Plamaroneck, N. ¥.

Mr. E. Hamitron BELL, Architect

Prare LXXII. 1 General View of the Garden c
PLrate LXXII. 2 The Side Path 4

Prate LXXIII. Looking toward the House a

Prate LXXVII.

“Ashfory,” Belle Waven, Conn. Prate LXXVII.

Mr. Witson Eyre, Jr., Architect ’
eat Pirate LXXVIII.

Pirate LXXVIII.

A Garven at Cornish, N. WH. S

a4~.The Garden from the House
‘errace a
2 The House Terraces 4

1 The Corner of the Ter-
race ¢

2 Along the Upper Terrace d

One?

whe OIF EEN

CA

yas a x
Us: wy etalk EE Pen

Prare LXXIV. 1 The House Court
Pirate LXXIV. 2 General View of the Garden Prave UXKX

Prate LXXV. 1 On the First Terrace c
Prate LXXV. 2 A Vine-covered Arch

Pirate LXXIX. * In the Flower Gardena - ©

1 The South Path 5
Prare LXXX. 2 Looking from the Terrace ¢ |

Prare LXXV. 3 The House Court - “Constitution Hill,” Princeton, N. H.
Prate LXXV. 4 The Descent to the Garden f_ Messrs. Cope & STEWARDSON, Architects ?

‘Glimpses of Two South Carolina
GrarVens

Prate LXXVI. 1 “ Middleton Place,’ A Ruined
Garden Walk

Pirate LXXVI. “2 “Drayton Hall,” The Mag-

nolia Garden

PLATE LXXXI. 1 The Fountain a
Pirate LXXXI. 2 Bird’s-eye View 4

“Branipwine Farm,” Lenape, Penn.
Messrs. KEEN & MEap, Architects ~

dash

oeeberiren

oe

3 b

+
neta
WAZ SACRE Se Tt GE a" SE GR | |.
“Shea arte Tene la Se ai era
giciay. atl Bc wi\

Pirate LXXXII. The Garden from the House a

yp

\ ati’
DY pot)

A Garden at Stockbridge, ‘Pass.

PLATE LXXXIII. 1s General View of the Gar-

- den a ;

Pirate LXXXIII. 2 General View of the Gar-
den 6

PLraTeE EXXXIV.
_Prate LXXXIV.

1 The Garden Seat c
2 Entrance to the Wild
Path d

A GKavrven at TA ellesley, falass.
Prare LXXXV. The Italian Garden

a ed

“ evar Court,” Morristown, N. FH.

Messrs. CARRERE & HasTincs, Architects

/

2 fra

PLATE LXXXVI.
Pirate LXXXVI.

1 The Court a |
2 The South Side of the
Court 4

Prate LXXXVII.
Prate LXXXVII.

1 The Fountain Basin c
2 The West End of the
- Pergola d

A Garven at Annapolis, PA. .

Pirate LXXXVIII. 1 The Grape Arbor
Prate LXXXVIII. 2 An Overgrown Corner

A Garven at Bernardsville, NF.

Mr. DaniEL W. LanctTon, Architect

ie

i » ed 4
BORE o TWAIN! |

>.
Se

EE
aa

LATES Lrdkalx. AND XC.

Pratre LXXXIX. General View of the Garden a ; “ Ophir farm,” Purchase, N. ¥.

Prare XC. ° 1 The Basin 4 ‘ >) Messrs. F. L. OLMsTED & Company, Architects
Prate XC. 2 Onthe Middle Terrace c

wr? OE

PAs j :
H | fee
r

Two Colonial Garden Gates

Prare XCI. 1 “The Old Sanford Garden,”
Nantucket, Mass.
Pirate XCI. 2 A Garden at Portsmouth, N. H.

Plate XCIV. General View of the Garden a

A PAassachusetts and a Pennsylvania
Garver

Pirate XCV. 1 A Garden at Beverly, Mass.
The Fountain
Pirate XCV. 2 “Sevenoaks,” Upsal, Penn.

Pirate XCII. 1 The South Side of the Garden 4 [Mr. Frank Miles Day,
Prate XCII. 2 The Centre of the Garden 2 Architect.] The Square
. Garden

“nRhjua House,” Newport, ir. xX.
asi ciahe —— “Naumteag,” Stockbridge, Pass.

Mr. NaTuan Barrett, Architect

ae

Prate XCIII. 1 The Garden from the Ter- Prate XCVI. 1 The Garden from the Ter--
race @ 2 Trace @

Prate XCIII. 2 The Terraced ° Pirate XCVI. 2 Along the Terrace d

‘\

“Sallis Court,” Bernarvaville, N. GF.

Messrs. CARRERE & Hastincs, Architects

Pirate XCVII. The Lower Garden a

’ Prate XCVIIL. 1 The Upper Garden looking
. toward the Veranda 4
2 The Upper Garden from the

Veranda c

Prate XQVIII.

A Garden at Salem, Pass.

“Chelten,” Moval, Pen.

Mr. Witson Eyre, Jr., Architect

Prate XCIX. 1 The Summer-house a
Pirate XCIX. A Garden Shelter 4
Pirate XCIX. Box-hedged Beds c
Prats XCIX. 4 A Winding Path d

PWN

Pirate C. Looking down the Centre Path a

Peate CI. 1 The Cross Path 4

Pirate CI. 2 Across the Lower End of the
Gardenc

Pirate CI. 3 A Corner Garden Housed +

Prate CI. 4 Across the Upper End of the

Garden e

Two Penusvlbanta Gardens

Pirate CII. 1 “ Pembroke,” Bryn Mawr, Penn.
The Garden Entrance.
Prate CII. 2 “ The Grange,” Overbrook,

Penn. A Sheltered Corner

“GA ashingtows Garven,”
HAL. Vernon, Va.

I Box-edged Beds a
2 A Corner bythe Slave Quarters 6

Pirate CIII.
Pirate CIII.

Pirate CIV. 1 The West Corner of the Gar-
den e
Pirate CIV. 2 The Long Path from the School-

‘ house f

Pirate CV. 1 Hollyhocks ¢ Pirate CVII. 1 A Bird’s-eye View o
Pirate CV. 2 The Rose Garden d Pirate CVII. 2 Across the Garden p

Pirate CVIII. 1 End of the Casino Pergola e
“Faulkner Farm,” Brookline, Pass. Prate CVI. 2 The Pool f

Mr. Cuartes A. Piatt, Architect

©

Pirare CIX. 1 Entrance to the Terraces 4
re Pirate CIX. 2 Steps to the Casino /
Pirate CIX. 3 Side Walk, looking toward the
: Pergola m-
Prare CIX. 4 Side Walk, looking from the
Pergola x

Prate CX. 1 A Corner of the Upper Terrace g
Prate CX. 2 End of the Casino Pergola %
Pirate CX. 3 Steps to the Upper Terrace 7
Pirate CX. 4 The Terrace Wall /

n

Pirate CX]. 1 The Upper Terrace ¢
y Pirate CXI. 2 A Corner of the Garden d

“Prats CVI. ‘The Garden from the Casino a PLATE CXIT. The Casino 4

bates

1

re ee to
fe Meh oon den

ors
as x

trade
Cran
Ty pepo