aw Cie
yak i
ALBERT R. MANN
LIBRARY
AT
VURNELL UNIVERSITY
Cornell University
The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.
There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924074140637
Production Note
Cornell University Library produced this volume
to replace the irreparably deteriorated
Original. It was scanned using Xerox software
and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution
and compressed prior to storage using CCITT
Group 4 compression. The digital data were used
to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper
that meets the ANSI Standard 239.48-1992. The
production of this volume was supported by the
National Endowment for the Humanities. Digital
file copyright by Cornell University Library
1994.
Scanned as part of the A.R. Mann Library project
to preserve and enhance access to the Core
Historical Literature of the Agricultural
Sciences. Titles included in this collection
are listed in the volumes published by the
Cornell University Press in the series THE
LITERATURE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
1991-1995, Wallace C. Olsen, series editor.
R. B. HINMAN
COLLECTION
PROFESSOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
1921-1943
New York
State College of Agriculture
At Cornell University
Ithaca, N. Y.
COUNTRY LIFE EDUCATION
SERIES
Edited by Charles William Burkett, recently Director
of Experiment Station, Kansas State Agricultural
College; Editor of American Agriculturist
TYPES AND BREEDS OF FARM ANIMALS
By Charles S. Plumb, Ohio State University
PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING
By Eugene Davenport, University of Illinois
FUNGOUS DISEASES OF PLANTS
By Benjamin Minge Duggar, Cornell University
SOIL FERTILITY AND PERMANENT
AGRICULTURE
By Cyril George Hopkins, University of Illinois
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF POULTRY
CULTURE
By John Henry Robinson, Editor of Farm- Poultry
Other volumes in preparation
BARRED PLYMOUTH ROCK COCKEREL, “ CRUSADER”
Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, -Massachusetts
(Photograph by Schilling)
PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF
POULTRY CULTURE
BY
JOHN H. ROBINSON
GINN AND COMPANY
BOSTON - NEW YORK - CHICAGO - LONDON
ENTERED AT STATIONERS’ HALL
COPYRIGHT, I912, BY
JOHN H. ROBINSON
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Qi2.1
The Athenrum Press
GINN AND COMPANY: PRO-
PRIETORS + BOSTON + U.S.A.
PREFACE
The method of treatment adopted in this book is the simple,
scientific method, —that of presenting essential facts in logical
order. The following of this method has led to some departures
from the conventional way of presenting poultry topics. The unity
of the poultry group is here conceived as essential and arising from
the nature of the birds, rather than as artificial and relating to the
purposes for which they are used ; and I have tried to give practical
effect to my very strong conviction that permanent poultry culture
must be a feature in permanent agriculture, and that each of the
common kinds of poultry has its peculiar place in agriculture.
Hence the methods of managing the different kinds of poultry are
not stated separately, as has been usual, but topics are discussed
in their own appropriate order with reference to all the kinds. This
arrangement emphasizes the things which apply alike to all kinds
of poultry, and makes it easy to show that good practice is simple
and that the same treatment will usually answer, in whole or in
part, for several different kinds, thus lightening the work of the
poultry keeper. It is believed also that by this arrangement of
matter the student or reader is given, with instruction in the details
of methods, a more comprehensive view of the subject as a whole
than by the usual mode of presenting it.
To the best of my ability the book gives the consensus of author-
itative opinion of a many-sided subject. In appraising this con-
sensus I have had regard alike to practical authority, expressed in
the views and practice of good poultrymen, and to scientific authority,
found in the bulletins and other papers of those instructors and
investigators who have been foremost in reducing to order the
confused mass of common knowledge of poultry culture. To the
practical poultrymen and fanciers I am most indebted-for facts; to
the instructors and investigators, for interpretations of facts and for
vii
vill POULTRY CULTURE
ideas and suggestions as to the presentation of the subject in such
a way as to meet the requirements of formal instruction.
To give credit, in the proper connection, to each of the many
whose experiences and opinions have contributed scmething to a
work which represents a life interest in poultry and more than a
score of years of intimate business and professional acquaintance
with poultry culture would be impossible. So it has seemed best to
make few direct references in the text, but to give in the appendix
a classified list of the literature of the subject.
The illustrations not credited to others are by the author.
Although many of the photographs and drawings were made for
this book, the elaborate scheme of illustration adopted was practi-
cable only because I already had a large private collection of pho-
tographs from which to select, and because I had access to the
files of photographs which had been used in Fasm-Poultry. Those
from the latter source the publishers have kindly allowed me to
use, with this general acknowledgment.
JOHN H. ROBINSON
READING, MASSACHUSETTS
CONTENTS
PAGE
INTRODUCTION ¢ « «© «© #@ * # » © @ © & &% @ «2 @
Need of instruction — Scope of instruction, 1 — Limits of instruc-
tion, 2 — Conditions of student practice, 3 — Collateral reading —
Technical terms and definitions, 4
PART I
THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
CHAPTER
I. NaruRE AND Uses oF PouLTRY . . . . . . .. . 5
Classes of domestic birds — Kinds of poultry — Common char-
acters of poultry, 5 The elementary poultry character, 7 —
Values of poultry, 8 — Properties of eggs, 10 — Services of poultry
in agriculture — Recreation in poultry culture, 11
II. EvoLtuTion oF THE PouLtry INDUSTRY ..... . 12
Antiquity of poultry culture — Pre-modern poultry culture, 12
— Persistence of primitive conditions explained — Quality of
common poultry, 13 — Improved native stocks — Interest in
distinctive types, 14 — First effects of acquaintance with improved
breeds, 15 — Development of the American type, 16 — Artificial
incubation, 17 — Exhibitions — Poultry literature of the early
period, 18 — Modern poultry literature — Journalism, 19 — Books,
20 — Instruction and investigation, 21 — Individual influence, 22 —
Trade spirit, 2
III. Economic Aspects oF PouLTRY CULTURE ... . . 24
First statistics of poultry, 24 — Present value of poultry products
in the United States, 25 The poultry industry, 26 — Trend of
development — Natural division of the poultry industry — Limita-
tions on development, 27 — Permanent poultry culture a branch
of agriculture, 28 — Poultry culture a necessary feature in agri-
culture, 29 — Poultry culture a diversified industry — Branches
of poultry culture, 30 — Egg farming, 32 — Factory methods in
poultry culture, 33 — Farm methods, 35 — The Petaluma district,
40 — Broiler farming, 43 — Roaster growing, 45 — Duck growing,
48 — Goose growing, 54 — Turkey growing, 58 — Other kinds of
poultry — Fancy poultry, 59 — Profitable combinations in poultry
culture, 61 — Combinations with poultry — Supply and demand, 62
ix
x POULTRY CULTURE
PART II
PRODUCTION
CHAPTER
IV. THe Pouttry KEEPER’s PROBLEMS
Common tasks — Hard problems, 64 — Relation of natural con-
ditions to poultry problems — Differences between practical
and theoretical problems, 66— The beginner’s most difficult
problem, 67
V. PouLtry TYPES AND THEIR RELATIONS TO OPBJECTS,
CONDITIONS, AND METHODS OF POULTRY KEEPING
Type defined — Type and breed, 69 — Breed type — breed divi-
sions — Breed relations — Economic classification of fowls, 70 —
Class properties, 71 — Necessary differences in conditions and
methods, 72
VI. Propiems or LocaTIon
Phases of the question of location— Climate, 74 — Special
features — Soils and drainage, 76 — Sunlight — Ventilation —
Markets, 77 — Transportation, 78
VII. Systems or PouLtrRy KEEPING
Definitions — General methods — Essence of system, 79 — Ordi-
nary farm methods — Extensive systems, 80 — The Rhode Island
colony system, 81 — Ordinary town methods, 84 — Intensive
systems, 85 — Comparison of extensive and intensive systems, 87
— Combining advantages of the two systems, 91 — Temporary
range — Weakest point in intensive systems, 94
VIII. Yarps anp FENCES
Yards a necessary evil, 95 — Height of fence, 96 — Area of yard,
97 — Alternating yards— Fence material, 983 Openings in
fences, 100
1X. Coops AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY
Prime considerations in shelters, 103 — Principal requirements
for comfort — Earliest form of poultry shelter — Simplest shelter
made for poultry, 104 — Poultry in owner’s dwelling — Tight
houses, 108 — Ventilation in tight houses — Beginning of the
fresh-air movement, 112 — Houses with open fronts— No best
house, 114— Floor dimensions, 116 — Height of structures —
PAGE
69
74
79
95
102
CHAPTER
CONTENTS
Depth of structures, 118 — Standard-size poultry-house unit —
Length of poultry houses, 119 — Styles of roof, 121 — Walls
— Floors, 125 — Eccentric features to be avoided — Materials
for poultry structures, 126 — Quality of construction, 127 — Pres-
ervation of structures — Structures for different kinds of poultry,
129 — Ancient and modern coops, 131 — Coops for indoor brood-
ers and growing chicks, 132— Small houses, stationary and.
portable, 134 — Colony poultry houses, 136 — Cloth-front houses,
137 — Late styles of poultry houses, 141 — Long poultry houses,
14§— Stages in construction of a long poultry house, 148 —
Fattening and killing houses — Brooder houses, 149 — Cockerel
house, 153 — Poultry houses on hillsides, 154
X. Pouttry—Hovuse FITTIncs
Roosts, 156 — Droppings boards, 158 — Roosting closets, 159 —
Nests, 160 — Feed troughs, 163 — Feed hoppers, 165 — l)rinking
vessels — Drinking fountains, 166— Dusting boxes — Common
tools, 167 — Cooking apparatus — Food mixers, 168 — Bone cut-
ters — Hay cutters — Root cutters, 169 — Carts for poultry work,
170 — Egg testers — Nest eggs — Transportation on the poultry
plant, 171
XI. NutTriTION oF POULTRY
Nutritive requirements — Nutritive organs, 172 — Differences in
beaks and crops — Natural foods and feeding habits of poultry,
175—Common poultry foods— Composition of foods, 178 —
Nutrient ratio, 180 — Expression of nutritive values, 181
XII. Pouttry Foops
Wheat, 183 — Wheat screenings — Low-grade flour — Middlings,
184 — Bran — Stale Bread — Corn, 185 — Corn meal, 186 — Corn
bran and corn middlings — Corn and cob meal — Hominy meal
—Gluten meal and gluten feed— Whole oats, 187 — Oatmeal
—Oat bran and oat feed— Oat middlings— Sprouted oats —
Barley, 188 — Barley screenings — Barley meal — Malt sprouts,
Dried brewer’s grains— Rye, 189— Mixed mill feeds, 190 —
Buckwheat — Buckwheat by-products — Rice, 191 — Sorghum
seed — Broom-corn seed— Flaxseed and cotton seed, 192—
Ground linseed — Linseed meal— Cottonseed by-products, 193
Peas and beans — Miscellaneous seeds, 194 — Green foods, 195
— Ensilage — Clovers and alfalfa, 196 — Clover meal and alfalfa
meal — Potatoes, 197 — Beets — Turnips — Onions, 198 — Apples
— Green bones — Meat by-products, 199 — Fresh fish, 200 — Fish
scrap — Shellfish — Milk, 201— Cheese — Milk albumin —
Eggs, 202 — Mineral foods, 203 — Dry bone — Oyster shells, 204
— Charcoal, 205
xl
PAGE
155
172
xi
POULTRY CULTURE
CHAPTER
XIII. Rations anp METHODS OF FEEDING.
XIV.
XV.
A ration defined — A balanced ration, 206— A balanced ration
an average ration, 207 —Common practice in feeding — How
methods of feeding are determined, 208 — Rations for special
purposes, 210 — Different rations for different kinds of poultry,
211 — Same ration for young and old poultry of the same kind
— Forcing rations, 212 — Special preparation of food — Mashes,
214 — Standard mashes, 217 — Popular standard mashes approxi-
mately balanced rations— Errors in use of wet mashes — Dry
mashes, 218 — Dangers in use of dry mashes, 220 — Rations for
fowls, 221 — Maine Experiment Station rations, 224 — Ontario
Experiment Station rations, 228-—— West Virginia Experiment
Station ration — Kansas Experiment Station rations, 229 — Cor-
nell Experiment Station rations, 230— Rations for turkeys,
peafowls, guineas, and pheasants, 233 — Rations for ducks, 235
— Rations for geese, 237
INCUBATION
Relation of incubation to other operations — The egg, 238 — A
fertile egg, 239 — Function of heat in incubation, 240 — Antiquity
of artificial methods — The problem in artificial incubation, 241
— Value of both methods of incubation — Hatching by natural
methods — Broodiness, 242 — System in natural incubation, 243
— Nests for sitting hens, 244 — Nest material — Selection of
eggs, 245 — Number of eggs in setting — Keeping hens confined
to nests, 246— Food of the sitting hen — Cleanliness — Testing
eggs, 248 — Period of incubation — Effects of chilling on eggs,
250 — Treatment of eggs at hatching time, 251 — Helping birds
out of the shell— Conditions of good hatching, 252 — Hatching
by artificial methods — Responsibility of the operator, 253 —
Selection of an incubator, 254 — Manufacturers’ directions for
operating incubators, 255 — Selection of eggs for artificial incu-
bation, 257 — Preliminary regulation of heat — Routine work of
operation, 258 — Factors in artificial incubation, 259 — Source of
moisture in incubation— Use of ventilation, 260 — Measuring
ventilation, 262 Management of incubator at hatching — Ac-
counting for results, 263 — Causes of poor hatches, 264 — Com-
mon errors in operating incubators, 265
GROWING POULTRY.
Growth a natural process — Constitution inherited — Initial se-
lection, 266— Preservation of vitality in young poultry, 267 —
Overcrowding the great cause of trouble in growing poultry,
268 — What constitutes overcrowding, 269 — Overcrowding
mostly unnecessary, 274— Warmth the first requirement —
Brooding temperatures, 275— Regulation of heat in artificial
brooding, 276— Methods of artificial brooding, 277 -—— Lamp-
heated brooders— Pipe brooder systems, 278 — Temperature
PAGE
206
CHAPTER
XVI.
XVII.
XVIII.
XIX.
XX.
CONTENTS
in artificial brooding — Regulation of temperature in brooders,
280— Period of artificial brooding — Protection from enemies,
282 — Protection from parasites, 283 Growth the test of the
work of the grower — Rate of growth, 284 — Separation of sexes
while growing — Separation according to age and size, 287 —
Disturbances to be avoided, 288
Ecc PRODUCTION .
Egg production distinguished from reproduction — Reproductive
organs of the female, 289 — Laying normally follows completion
of growth, 290 — Causes of retarded laying, 291 — Conditions of
egg production, 293 — Duration of laying periods, 297 — Molting
and egg production — Variability of egg yields, 298 — Selection
of stock for laying, 299 — Effect of age on production, 300
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE
Fattening a finishing process — Common practice, 301 — Simple
methods of fattening, 302 Causes of failure in finishing by
ordinary methods, 305 — Special fattening plants using ordinary
methods, 306 — Special finishing methods — Crate feeding, 307
— Cramming, 308 — Caponizing, 309
PREPARATION OF PouLTRY PRODUCTS FOR MaRKET
Dressed poultry — Fasting — Killing, 311 — Wringing the neck
— Cutting off the head, 312 — Sticking, 313 — Scalding, 314 —
Dry picking, 316 — Scalding and dry picking compared — Market
requirements as to picking, 318 — Importance of proper cooling,
319— Shaping — Grading, 320 — Packing, 321 — Standard sizes
of boxes, 322 — Feathers — Shipping live poultry — Sorting and
grading, 324 — Eggs — Cleaning eggs, 325— Sorting eggs for
color — Grading eggs for size, 326 — Egg cases and boxes, 327
MarKETING POULTRY PRODUCTS
Poultry keepers and middlemen, 329 — Collection and distribu-
tion of poultry products — Eggs, 330— Live poultry — Dressed
poultry — Relative advantages of selling poultry alive and dressed,
333 — Feathers, 334 — Manure — Cooperative selling of poultry
products, 335
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE AND VICE
Hygiene and sanitation, 337 — Causes of disease — Constitutional
causes of disease — Dietetic causes of disease, 338 — Environ-
mental causes of disease — Contagious diseases — Symptoms of
disease, 339 — Special symptoms plain to ordinary observation—
General treatment of disease, 340 — Injuries — Internal parasites,
341 — External parasites — Vices, 342
xl
PAGE
301
311
329
337
XIV
CHAPTER
XXiI.
XXII.
XXIII.
XXIV.
XXV.
POULTRY CULTURE
PART III
REPRODUCTION
Types, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Original type of the domestic fowl, 344— Types of domestic
fowls, 346 — Game types, 347 — Aseel, 348 — English Game, 349
— Cornish Indian, 350 — Malay, 351 — Laying types, 352 — Lay-
ing breeds, 353 — Mediterranean laying types, 3 54 — Italian stocks,
355 — Spanish section of Mediterranean class, 362 — Other races
of the Mediterranean type, 367 — Mid-European laying types, 368
— Primitive crested types, 375— European meat types, 376—
English meat types, 377 — French and Belgian meat types, 380
— The Asiatic meat type, 384 — Divisions of the Asiatic meat
type, 387—General-purpose types, 394— Earliest American
types, 397 — Origin of the Barred Plymouth Rock, 398 — The
Wyandottes, 406 — Rhode Island Reds, 413 — The Orping-
tons, 416 — Continental European general-purpose types, 423 —
Deformed types, 424 — Bantams, 425
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, AND PHEASANTS
Turkeys, 429 — Peafowls, 436 — Guineas — Pheasants, 437
Types AND BREEDS OF Ducks
The common wild duck, 438— Common domestic ducks — Im-
proved races of ducks — Meat types, 439 — Laying-type ducks,
447 — Common ornamental ducks, 448
GEESE AND SWANS
Economic races of geese— Common geese, 449— Improved
breeds of geese, 451 — Asiatic types of geese, 453 — The American
Wild Goose, 457 — Ornamental geese — Swans, 458
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING .
Kinds of reproduction — Likeness in asexual reproduction —
Relations of body and germ, 459 — Beginning of variation — The
function of sex, 461— Likeness in sexual reproduction, 462 —
Relation of sex to inheritance, 463— Prepotency, 464 — Pre-
potency and selection— Transmission of prepotency, 466 —
Present and latent characters — Alternate inheritance, reversion,
and atavism, 467 — Laws of heredity —Galton’s law, 468 —
Mendel’s law, 469 — Correlation of characters, 471
PAGE
344
449
459
CONTENTS XV
CHAPTER PAGE
XXVI. APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF POULTRY BREEDING 475
Adaptability of poultry breeding — Length of life and breeding
value, 476 — Relative value of male and female, 477 — Selection,
478 — Poultry standards, 479 — Relative value of characters in
selection, 480 — Systems of selection, 481 — Essential characters
— Substantial characters, 482 — Superficial characters, 483 —
Collective selection and compensation in breeding, 484 — Inbreed-
ing and line breeding — Close breeding, 485— The rule of good
practice, 486 — Danger of new blood — Age and breeding quality,
487 — Ratio of females to males, 488 — Period of fertility, 489 —
Regulation of sex, 490 — Mating systems — Details of matings,
491 — Mating for egg production, 492 — Mating for table poultry,
495 — Selection for shape in mating Standard poultry, 504 —
Color matings of poultry, 507
PART TV
THE POULTRY FANCY
XXVII. Pou_try ExuHIsitions ® sis. tee 3S. dn 535
Primary poultry exhibitions, 535 Modern poultry exhibitions,
536 — Educational aspects of exhibitions, 537 — Nature of com-
petition, 538 — Financing a show, 539 — Management of a show,
540 — Quality of exhibits — Judges, 541 — Methods of judging —
Classification, 542 — Sweepstakes prizes — Special exhibits, 548
— Balancing exhibits — Practical exhibits, 549 — Suggestions
for improving shows, 550 — Institutes at poultry shows, 552 —
College poultry exhibitions, 553
XXVIII. FIrrinG aNnD EXHIBITING POULTRY . . . . 554
Selecting for exhibition, 554— Conditioning, 555 — Grooming
and faking, 557— Ethics of conditioning — Details of artificial
fitting, 560 — Shipment to shows, 563 — Care of birds at shows —
Returning birds from shows, 564
XXIX. JupciInc . . . .. BAR ae Bo & abe. 1966
Judging defined — Objects of judging, 566 — Methods of judging,
567 — Factors in score-card judging, 568 — Limitations of the
score card, 569 — Use of score cards, 571 — Uniformity in judging
— Recognition of utility values in judging exhibition poultry
— Judging poultry products, 574
Xvi POULTRY CULTURE
CHAPTER PAGE
XXX. THe TRaDE IN PurE-Brep PouLTRy anp Eccs . . 576
Composite character of the trade, 576— Values in pure-bred
poultry and eggs, 577 — Profits from fancy poultry — Peculiarities
of the trade, 578 — Confidence the basis of trade, 579 — Advertis-
ing, 580 — Correspondence — Terms and obligation, 581 — Scales
of prices, 583 — Packing and shipping, 585
BIBLIOGRAPHY. . . . . . F F - 587
INDEX .. . : Dip lad sae sts i) ap lag! SOF,
POULTRY CULTURE
INTRODUCTION
Need of instruction. The practice of poultry culture is an art or
a craft or a combination of art and craft according to the purpose
for which it is pursued and the taste and skill of those engaged in
it. A workman may attain great proficiency in many operations
merely through skill in imitation. Such a workman, however,
must work always after a model or under the direction of one
familiar with all phases of his art or craft and thoroughly under-
standing its principles. In any enterprise engaging large numbers
of people, only a small proportion of these need be qualified to
oversee and direct the work; but as the number of persons
engaged diminishes, the proportion understanding the processes
involved and their relations must increase, until, in such occupa-
tions as farming and housekeeping, each husbandman and house-
wife must be able to do and to direct the doing of a variety of
operations, adapting and adjusting all to the general result sought.
The relation of this fact to agricultural and technical education
has not been sufficiently emphasized. Considering it here only in
its application to poultry culture, it is plain that a general knowl-
edge of the subject is as necessary and as useful to one whose
plans contemplate perhaps the maintenance of a flock of a few
hundred fowls on the farm as to one who intends to undertake
operations on a large scale. Both require the same preparation, as
far as preparation can be given by book and class instruction.
Scope of instruction. The subject includes a great variety of
topics. An accurate general knowledge of the subject requires
such familiarity with all these topics that the relations of the
various phenomena of poultry culture will be promptly recognized
and effects estimated with approximate correctness whenever there
I
2 POULTRY CULTURE
is occasion to consider them. It is from inability to do this that
poultry keepers who have become proficient in a special line
carried on under particular conditions so often make serious mis-
takes when conditions change or when they make departures from
methods with which they are familiar. As it is not possible for a
student during the period of a course of instruction, or even in
some years of practice, to acquire such acquaintance with all phases
of the subject empirically, a textbook must so present the subject
that historical fact and description and discussion of materials and
methods will, as far as possible, compensate for lack of experience.
Thus a textbook must especially emphasize many things that do
not strongly appeal to the novice most interested in what he can
immediately put into practice.
The limits of instruction. The quantity of theory of this subject
which one may assimilate and the rate at which principles may be
mastered vary with the nature of the matter as well as with the
preparation and capacity of the student.
Thus a thorough knowledge of the principles of poultry-house
construction may be acquired from books alone in a comparatively
short time, and with knowledge so acquired a person with a little
skill in carpentry may design and build a house in every respect
as good as any experienced poultryman would make, provided
always that the principles are understood and correctly applied. But
in feeding, a working knowledge of principles is rarely, if ever,
acquired without practice. Practice in feeding sufficient to assist
to a good understanding of principles can be had in a few months
or even in a few weeks. In such matters as breeding, real practice
cannot be given in connection with courses of instruction. Long-
course students who are familiar with the general principles of
breeding and their application to domestic animals should have no
difficulty in understanding their applications to poultry. The short-
course student who lacks this preparation, and who has had no ex-
perience in breeding, gets at best but a limited appreciation of
principles from the condensed statement of them appropriate in
a general treatise on poultry. The student at home is even more
heavily handicapped. As a rule such an understanding of the
principles of breeding as every breeder should have is only acquired
after thorough study and long practice.
INTRODUCTION 3
The three cases mentioned are representative of classes of topics
in which book instruction alone, even when insufficient, may be of
considerable value without practice. The practice of poultry culture
includes also many operations (as killing and dressing poultry,
caponizing, etc.) difficult to describe in words even when de-
scriptions are supplemented with illustrations. Actual skill in these
is not, however, essential to a general knowledge of the subject.
Conditions of student practice. In an agricultural college or
school, students are given practice under the supervision of an in-
structor. Asa rule the amount of actual practice by each student
is no more (often less) than he would have at home with a small
flock ; but each student may observe the practice of other students
and benefit by the instructor’s suggestions to all. Students at
these institutions have the further advantage of observation of the
work at the permanent plant of the department, conducted usually
by a skillful manager assisted by advanced students. As it is not
generally feasible to make practice correspond chronologically with
the work in the classroom, much of it is at first done by direction,
just as it would be on a poultry plant where formal instruction was
not given.
Those who use this book in connection with home practice will
find it a good plan to read it in order and then give special atten-
tion to topics related to the work of the season. The amount of
practice will depend, of course, on the extent of their operations.
It is well to remember that if work is projected on a scale out of
proportion to knowledge and skill, the cost of practice (through
losses) may be far beyond its value. Also, while there is a certain
benefit to be derived from unsuccessful effort and unprofitable
experience, it is of an indefinite and rather negative quality.
The student at work for a successful poultry keeper has the best
of opportunities for practice and observation. This is true, though
his employer or superintendent has a narrow view of conditions
and methods beyond his own experience, and though the methods
used are at points defective. It may be accepted as a certainty that
wherever success with poultry is continuous, most of the essentials
of good practice are observed.
The student who learns, or has good cause to suppose, that a
poultry plant on which he is engaged is maintained from other
4 POULTRY CULTURE
sources than the annual income from poultry will, as a rule, find it
to his advantage to leave it; for he is not likely to learn there to
do a profitable day’s work in a day, and he is likely to acquire
habits of work and an attitude toward his work which permanently
impair his efficiency.
Collateral reading. Only carefully selected standard books and
papers should be used. Indiscriminate reading of poultry literature
is a hindrance oftener than a help. The fictions of poultry culture
are mostly plausible and generally more alluring than the facts,
and the usual result of much reading in advance of a thorough
grounding in principles is an accumulation of obsolete and imprac-
ticable ideas. The danger of this is greatest to the independent
student, who lacks the opportunity of the college student to refer
to instructors for opinions on matters which attract his attention as
he reads. In the present state of knowledge of the subject it
cannot be expected that even those who may be classed as good
authorities will agree at all points, but the seeming disagreements
of authorities are often due to partial statements, and disappear
when a full statement is made. On the whole there is little of
direct, importance to a novice in poultry culture about which
authorities are not substantially agreed.
Technical terms and definitions. These have hitherto been
given scant attention by writers on poultry. Most of the terms
have been taken from common usage and are generally very loosely
used. Many terms constantly used in a technical sense have been
neither defined nor applied with precision by writers on the sub-
ject. In this book such terms as require definition will be defined
either in the text or in the footnotes, when first used, and each
term used thereafter only in accordance with the definition.
PART lL. THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
CHAPTER I
NATURE AND USES OF POULTRY
Classes of domestic birds. Birds in domestication are divided
according to their relations to men into three general classes :
Poultry, Pigeons, and Cage Birds. This book is concerned with
pigeons and cage birds only in so far as discussion of the con-
trasting characters of poultry and the other two classes serves to
illustrate the nature and emphasize the usefulness of poultry.
Kinds of poultry. The word “ poultry’’? is the name of a
group of domestic birds so different in some respects that from a
naturalist’s standpoint their inclusion in one group seems arbitrary
and artificial, warranted perhaps by convenience but not justified
on any scientific principle. Besides the more familiar kinds, as to
the position of which in this group there is no disagreement, a few
others not so well known are included in it by authorities on poul-
try culture. The group as thus made up includes fowls,! turkeys,
guineas, peafowls, pheasants, ostriches, ducks, geese, and swans.
Common characters of poultry. Birds of the poultry group are
alike in the several characteristics which determine adaptability to,
and a high degree of usefulness in, domestication.
1. They are terrestrial in habit, — some naturally, others as a
result of modifications of structure under domestication. Fowls,
turkeys, guineas, peafowls, and pheasants are land birds with no
power of sustained flight. The aquatic habit of ducks and geese of
1 Bird is the generic term applying to all feathered creatures. /ow/, which
once had as wide significance, is now applied to the most common kind of domes-
tic bird, — to cocks and hens, and in dead poultry especially to hens.
2 The term applies to living birds and also to their flesh as food for man. It is
properly collective in meaning. for though used to refer to a single kind of birds,
when so used it does not identify that kind, but merely indicates that it is one of
the several kinds comprised in the poultry group.
5
6 POULTRY CULTURE
the species that have been domesticated, though conspicuous, is
not their principal habit. They are essentially land birds. Ducks
and geese in their natural state are also aérial in habit, though the
power of sustained flight seems to be used only for purpose of
migration. In domestication ducks and geese within a few genera-
tions lose the power of flight to such an extent that they are the
most easily restrained of all domestic creatures.
2. They are omnivorous fecdcrs, like man, and hence may be
fed largely on food wasted by man (in manufacture as well as in con-
sumption) and on foods wasted by or not available for the larger
domestic animals. The different kinds of poultry vary in the pro-
portions of different kinds of food which they normally take. This
is of further advantage to man, as will be shown in Chapter XI.
3. They are docile in disposition and readily adapt themselves
to the conditions of life which domestication imposes. Of the many
kinds of birds valuable for food purposes it is significant that only
five are commonly found in a state of domestication : four kinds of
poultry (fowls, turkeys, ducks, geese), and pigeons. These do not
appear to have been deliberately selected for domestication as more
valuable than others. It is probable that from the time savage man
began to snare and trap birds, or was moved occasionally to try to
remedy a less than mortal injury inflicted by his weapon, nearly
every kind of bird has been kept in captivity. Many wild birds are
as highly prized for food as any of those that have been domesti-
cated. It was, evidently, not so much the taste of men, or the some-
thing in the bird which appealed to that taste, which had most
effect in determining which kinds should be domesticated. It was
adaptability to the conditions of domestic life ; and this adaptability
depended upon docility, — capacity to develop confidence in man and
to live in some degree of harmony with other domestic creatures.
4. They are of sufficient size to be individually of economic im-
portance. This applies to ordinary specimens of the smaller kinds
and all specimens of the larger kinds of poultry. Bantam fowls
(except the larger types, Cochin and Brahma) are of no importance
except for ‘‘ fancy.”
5. They tend to improve in domestication in qualities most
valuable to man. This is most noticeable in a comparison of poul-
try and pigeons. Improvement in pigeons is possible, and much
NATURE AND USES OF POULTRY 7
has been done in that line, but no such marked general improve-
ment has taken place in pigeons as in the common kinds of poultry.
6. They are completely under the control of man in domestica-
tion. In this respect the pigeon affords a most striking contrast.
All kinds of poultry can be restrained by fences or kept in yards ;
pigeons can be controlled only in cages.
7. They are dependent upon man for existence in civilization.
Aérial birds may maintain themselves in settled districts independ-
ently of man.! Birds of the poultry group, once domesticated, be-
come dependent on man and can exist in contact with civilization
only as the property of individuals who protect them.
The elementary poultry character. The characteristic of terres-
trial birds which is of prime economic importance is the condition
of the young when hatched. The young of terrestrial birds emerge
from the shell full-formed, well covered with down, capable of loco-
motion, and able to feed themselves as soon as they require nourish-
ment. Thus from the start they are, in a remarkable degree,
independent of the parent, while the young of aérial birds, hatched
naked, blind, and helpless, are wholly dependent upon the parents
until quite full-grown. A high degree of independence in the young
of birds which live and nest upon the ground is a necessary condi-
tion of that mode of life in a state of nature. In domestication this
same characteristic greatly augments their usefulness, permitting
important modifications in their habits and making it possible to
produce them economically in much greater numbers and under a
greater variety of conditions than any other kind of domestic crea-
tures. The importance of this characteristic is seen very plainly
when we contrast those habits of aérial and terrestrial birds which
are associated with the condition of the young, and compare the
things which may profitably be done with birds in domestication.
Young aérial birds require so much attention from their parents
that birds of this class are necessarily monogamous in mating habits
1 It is a fact worth noting in this connection that while the wild pigeon in
North America has almost disappeared, flocks of free pigeons maintain them-
selves in large cities, where they often make themselves a nuisance, escaping
destruction more easily than in the open country because conditions in the city
prohibit the use of the weapons most effective in exterminating them. So the
little English sparrow, individually insignificant, finds its greatest safety in the cities,
where it multiplies amazingly, and efforts to dislodge or exterminate it are futile.
8 POULTRY CULTURE
and of relatively low fecundity, rearing usually only from two to
four or five young at a time and breeding only once or twice in a
season. Even pigeons in domestication, while breeding perhaps
once in two months the year round, produce annually but ten or
twelve young to the pair. Thus it is necessary to retain, for breeding
purposes, as many males as females, and even then the rate of
increase is slow as compared with that of land birds. In general,
birds of this class will perish if deprived of the care of their own
parents, while, because the amount of attention they require is out
of all proportion to their individual value, man cannot afford to
attend to their wants.
Among terrestrial birds, pairing seems to have been the original
mating habit. The disposition to pair often crops out even in
fowls, which are conspicuously polygamous and indiscriminate in
this relation. Young geese usually mate in pairs, and these and
the males of geese and some others of the rarer kinds of poultry
generally mate with only a small number of females. But when
one parent, naturally the female, can hatch and care for a large
number of young, the male, relieved of direct responsibility for the
care of his offspring, increases the number of his mates and seeks
to destroy the rivals for their affections. However beautiful mo-
nogamy among the lower creatures may appear when considered
ethically, economically it is a fault which severely restricts the pos-
sibilities of reproduction and reduces the profits of production.
The general serviceableness and popularity of the various kinds of
poultry are very nearly in proportion to the amount of deviation
from the habit of pairing which it has been possible to secure.
Not being dependent on the care of adults of their own kind, the
young of land birds may be reared by other land birds or by the
use of artificial methods. So it is possible to relieve the females
also of the care of the young to any extent desirable, and to take
full advantage of their fecundity.
Values of poultry. Poultry contribute to the welfare of men in
more ways than any other class of creatures. They supply him
with flesh and eggs for food, and feathers for comfort or ornament,
utilize many wastes of the house and farm, are of service in agri-
culture, and minister to man’s pleasure. Their /’kexcss simplifies
the work of caring for different kinds under one management,
NATURE AND USES OF POULTRY 9
their differences of habit often enable the poultryman to handle
flocks of several kinds much more profitably than he could keep
an equal number of any one kind, and their difference in products
gives a greater variety of articles for use or sale.
The use of poultry flesh as food is governed by its convenience,
quality, and cheapness.
Convenience. While, compared among themselves, the common
birds of the poultry group show considerable diversity in size, com-
pared with other domestic creatures generally used for food they
are all small. Their size is such that at any season and in any
climate an ordinary family can use a carcass while fresh. Their
conformation is such that the killing and dressing of poultry are
comparatively easy and cleanly processes, often performed by
women, and even by quite young children.
Quality. The flesh of poultry, compared with that of mammals
grown for food purposes in domestication, is finer grained and,
when in proper condition, more tender. It is at the same time easily
digested and highly nutritious. The flesh of the more common kinds
of strictly land birds (fowls and turkeys) is regarded as a necessity
for invalids and persons of weak digestion, and is the most popular
luxury in the meat line. The flesh of ducks and geese, being more
oily and of stronger flavor, is not so freely used except by those races
which do not eat pork, but all kinds of poultry meat are commonly
rated as greater delicacies than meat of other domestic creatures.
Cheapness. The cost of poultry is estimated differently by the
producer consuming a home product and the consumer buying
what he uses. For the grower, as a rule, poultry is actually cheap
meat. The agricultural service of the birds and their feeding
largely on stuffs that would otherwise go to waste make the cost
of production on farms small. Even where they are grown at
greater expense, the cost is usually low enough to make it as eco-
nomical for the grower to use poultry freely as to buy other meat
of like quality. It is this cheapness and convenience, as already
noted, that determine the use in America of enormous quantities
of poultry by producers and bring about the almost universal desire
to grow poultry wherever there is opportunity to do so.
For the buyer, poultry is generally cheap as compared with other
meats which may be used to supplement the beef, mutton, and pork
10 POULTRY CULTURE
which are staple meat foods for most healthy people, or as substi-
tutes for them in the diet of invalids. Thus it is cheapness and
guality that determine the use of poultry by those who, buying all
meat as they use it, are not brought to an appreciation of the con-
venience enjoyed by those who produce their own poultry. This
difference in estimates of the properties making poultry desirable
as food accounts for the too common failure of poultry growers to
understand the demand for poultry of superior table quality. The
grower using poultry as a staple meat and selling his surplus is
not as particular as to the quality of the meat as the nonproduc-
ing consumer to whom it is a delicacy.
Properties of eggs. The egg — the most unique of food products
—— is the only article of animal food which we have in a natural pack-
age. The term “hen fruit,” though facetiously used, recognizes a
resemblance between the egg and the large class of fruits whose
edible portion is protected by a covering which, as long as it
remains intact, is a highly effective guard against many external
causes of deterioration. Eggs may be kept reasonably fresh and
sweet in conditions and at temperatures in which meat could be
kept for only a short time. Easily digested, highly nutritious, con-
sidered as a separate article of diet they have, in even greater degree
than the creatures which supply them, the properties of palatability
and convenience.
The most important use of eggs, however, is in combination
with other ingredients in the endless variety of food concoctions
that have been devised. While eggs for eating are often regarded
as a luxury, to be indulged in according to the price of eggs as com-
pared with other foods, eggs for cooking are generally regarded as
a necessity. In a close analysis of the subject, the demand for eggs
is seen to have a great deal of influence in determining the relative
popularity of the different kinds of poultry, and also to increase
their production, thus reducing the cost of table poultry to the
consumer.
Feathers are a by-product in poultry culture, except in ostrich
farming, which is limited to a few localities and not extensive any-
where. With this exception the production of feathers for com-
merce is never a direct object in poultry keeping. The feathers of
the common kinds of poultry, when saved and sold, will, it is usually
NATURE AND USES OF POULTRY II
estimated, bring just about enough! to pay for dressing the birds
and for the preparation of the feathers for market.
Services of poultry in agriculture. The possibilities of making
poultry work are only beginning to be duly appreciated. For
centuries poultry on farms have been kept about the dwelling and
outbuildings, where a limited number might be tolerated, but with
efforts to keep a large stock, or to keep several kinds together,
they usually became a nuisance. Gradually farmers have been
learning that, with a proper distribution of poultry on the farm,
larger stocks can be kept at relatively less cost and with much
better results. Some of the characteristics of poultry most objection-
able when the stock is allowed to concentrate near the dwelling and
is not kept under restraint are most useful when properly directed.
Of poultry in general it may be said that, more than any other
kind of domestic live stock, they can be made of service to the
husbandman, because of the extent to which they can be kept on
land occupied by crops, not only without damaging the crops, but
with benefit to them and improvement to the land.
Recreation in poultry culture. Poultry minister to the pleasure
of man in various ways. Many flocks are kept ‘‘to look at”’ either
because of their general attractiveness as living figures in the land-
scape, or because of their peculiar attractiveness to their owner.
In these uses poultry satisfy a rather passive interest. Active
interest in poultry kept for recreation is almost invariably closely
associated with the desire of man to improve the products of
nature. A bird which he regards as of exceptional merit is valued
by the poultry fancier more as a product of his skill than as a thing
in itself beautiful. The breeder of pit gamecocks is insensible to
the brutality of the sport, because it is to him the necessary test of
fighting quality and courage brought to their highest development
by his skill in breeding and handling his birds.
1 While this is the common opinion, and may still be right for most cases, at
some places the cost of picking has increased of recent years faster than the
price of feathers.
CHAPTER II
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY
Antiquity of poultry culture. The beginnings of poultry keep-
ing were a part of prehistoric human life. Our Aryan ancestors
had poultry, but whether they domesticated it after having made
some progress in civilization, or at an earlier period, or received
it from an earlier or an alien race is not known. From the greater
ease of taking and holding in captivity such birds as the fowl, duck,
and goose it is quite reasonable to suppose that these may have
been domesticated before any of the mammals, and by people in
a most primitive state. The distribution of domestic fowls, ducks,
and geese over the earth has followed in a general way the
migrations of peoples of Aryan origin. An important exception
appears to be the case of the Chinese poultry, which, according
to their tradition, was received from the West about 1400 B.c.
Pre-modern poultry culture. Prior to the middle of the nine-
teenth century, poultry culture was essentially primitive and appar-
ently conducted on the same general lines in all lands. Accounts
of poultry keeping in this long period are rare and historically
of little value. Unsatisfactory as these writings are as sources of
complete information, they give an impression of the conditions
that they reflect which is undoubtedly correct in its general features,
and which suffices for the practical student, if not for the curious
investigator. From the remaining records of this period and from
the fact that in it nearly all prominent types of poultry were devel-
oped and brought to a high grade of excellence, it may reasonably
be concluded :
First: That the common idea that poultry culture throughout this period
was characterized by general ignorance of good methods of management and
universal failure to appreciate the possibilities of profit from poultry is erron-
eous; and,
Second: That the industry was everywhere developed on a scale and along
lines appropriate to circumstances affecting it; that keepers of poultry in general
12
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 13
were as well versed in management as conditions and the scale of operations
required; and that persons especially interested in poultry, though relatively
less numerous, were, probably, quite as skillful as now.
We are coming to a better appreciation of these facts as, after
many efforts to force the development of the industry in accord-
ance with ‘“‘factory’’ ideas, we return to the simpler methods of
earlier times.
Persistence of primitive conditions explained. Before the appli-
cation of steam as a motive force gave a new and tremendous
stimulus to trade and manufacturing and brought about a great
movement of population to the cities, only a very small per cent of
people were so situated that they could not either produce what
poultry and eggs they needed or procure cheap supplies from nearby
sources. The value of products of this class was usually not great
enough to warrant transportation from a distance. Except in the
vicinity of a few large cities, a poultry keeper producing beyond
the needs of his own family would not often find’a profitable outlet
for the surplus. Under such conditions poultry culture was neces-
sarily almost everywhere a home industry producing for home
consumption, and that is still the status of the industry in every
agricultural section which has not easy access for its products to
large cities or to manufacturing or mining sections.
Quality of common poultry. The ordinary native stocks of fowls,
ducks, geese, and turkeys in America, at the time of the general
awakening of interest in improved poultry and for some years after,
were, even when compared with the average mongrel stocks of
to-day, small birds of distinctly inferior table qualities and usually
inferior also in egg production. This degeneracy of stock was
due to the common practice of selecting for the table first. When
a bird was wanted for food it was usual to take the largest and
best. The result of this sort of selection, continuously operative,
was that the poorest specimens of each year were left for next
year’s breeding. That such practice, persistently followed, did not
quickly run the stock out was due to these saving circumstances :
(1) the natural tendency of the stock to improve under (2) the
very favorable conditions which small flocks at liberty on farms
enjoyed, and (3) the occasional introduction of blood of improved.
native stock.
14 POULTRY CULTURE
Improved native stocks. In fowls, especially, flocks of superior
quality were without doubt numerous enough to have considerable
influence on the general stock. With an occasional exception these
improved stocks were of no fixed color type. They are perhaps best
described as such mongrels, not much better than the general run
of native stocks, as would be obtained by selecting the best for
breeding instead of for eating. Now and then a person particularly
interested in poultry would breed his flock to one type of color,
but the prevailing belief was that the best breeding was that which
combined the greatest variety ; and, as a rule, specimens leaving
such flocks were not bred to the type, but were used to give to
the purchaser’s stock such of their quality as they could. Hawk-
colored or Dominique fowls were commonly thought to be su-
perior layers, but in general, virtue was attributed to the color,
without regard to breeding or other characteristics. This color
type being also a most persistent one, hawk-colored fowls were
numerous, and occasional references may be found to flocks in
which this was the dominant color.
Interest in distinctive types. The first importations of foreign
breeds to attract general attention were the importations of fowls
from China in 1846 (?). Though details and dates are lacking, it
is scarcely open to doubt that both Asiatic! and European fowls
were occasionally imported in colonial times, — possibly some
breeds by early settlers; but there is little evidence of interest
in improved stock of any kind until after the Revolution.
With the awakening of interest in and inquiry for stock of
reputedly pure and superior blood, it was found that there was
altogether a great deal of such stock in the country, and that all
the principal types were well represented. Until the sensational
exploitation of the Asiatics they seemed less in favor than the
Dorkings, Spanish, and Polish. All of these races, and others
which came in later, were crude as compared with the carefully
developed types of to-day. The wonderful stories sometimes told
of their size, precocity, and productiveness greatly stimulated
interest in them. On the supposition that these stories were
authentic, the impression grew up in later times that the early
1 Kerr, Domestic and Ornamental Poultry (1851), p.270, says that Asiatic
fowls were brought to the vicinity of Philadelphia about forty years before.
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 15
stocks were much superior in size, vigor, and productiveness to
those of their kind known at the present day. What the truth as
to this may be must always remain a matter of conjecture. The
probable truth is that the early stocks were on the whole inferior
to average specimens of their races at the present time. Certain
it is that not one of the many foreign breeds introduced was of
the type adapted to American ideas and conditions. No one
of them ever appealed, or could have appealed, to the mass of
poultry keepers as has the so-called American type, otherwise
known as the general-purpose type.
Importations of ducks and geese of foreign breeds early made
American fanciers familiar with the favorites, of both kinds, in
various parts of Europe, and with the Chinese and African races
of geese. Singularly, the most important of all foreign breeds of
waterfowl, the Pekin duck, was almost unknown in this country
until quite late in the nineteenth century. Coming into general
notice just at the time when artificial methods of incubation and
brooding had been brought to a practical stage, and being espe-
cially adapted to the intensive methods of culture which harmonize
with these, the Pekin duck furnished the material for what soon
became the most profitable line of poultry culture.
In the improvement of the turkey the greatest progress was
made by crossing the domestic native with the original wild stock,
still found in its natural state in certain localities over a wide
area of country.
First effects of aquaintance with improved breeds. Observation
of the striking new types could not fail to impress on the minds of
those already interested in the improvement of poultry, the advan-
tages of fixed type and of uniformity in the individuals of a flock,
or to create an interest in methods of producing these. Naturally
such persons procured and bred stock of these breeds, but from
the beginning of public interest in them it was apparent that the
mass of poultry keepers were more interested in the new breeds
for the benefits to the native stock from crossing with them, than
for the development of the breeds in their purity.
It was for this reason, and perhaps also because they had been
quite widely introduced through all that part of the country which
was in close touch with Asiatic commerce, that the Asiatic fowls
16 POULTRY CULTURE
were so extensively used to grade up the native stock. They,
more than any other race, had the size which degenerate native
stock everywhere lacks. They were also of more robust constitu-
tion than the European races. It is said on good authority that,
as a result of the crossing of Asiatic on native stock, the average
size of fowls brought to the Boston market was doubled within a
few years.
Development of the American type. Familiarity with the foreign
types and with the results of mixture with the native stocks quickly
developed the idea of a type of fowl better suited to America than
any of the others. While most poultry keepers were using stock
of the new breeds with their native stock, without much thought
beyond immediate results, some of the fanciers and the more intelli-
gent breeders were trying to make and establish breeds having the
characteristics generally desired. The ideal of the American type
seems to have become fixed in many minds at the very beginning
of efforts to improve poultry. In the few years following 1850 a
great many crosses were made for this purpose and offered as
new breeds.
While information concerning these is meager, it can hardly be
doubted that many of these mixtures gave fowls differing but
slightly in substantial characters from the type desired. The com-
bination of such qualities with superficial characters attractive to
the mass of poultry keepers was not produced until the Plymouth
Rock appeared in the late sixties. This breed was first exhibited
in 1869, and immediately entered upon the career of popularity
which was soon to make it more numerous in America than all
other standard-bred fowls combined. While in the duplicating
of the original stocks, and in the perfecting of the breed, other
elements were used, and the various lines subsequently mingled
to such an extent that no accurate analysis of the blood lines of
the modern Barred Rock is possible, the first stock was made by
crossing a male of the hawk-colored type on black Asiatic hens,
called by some Javas and by some Cochins. This cross gave
birds of the color that had long been regarded as associated with
peculiar merit, and at the same time gave a fowl of the medium
size desired and having for its ancestry the hardiest native stock
and the hardiest of the foreign races.
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 17
The Barred Plymouth Rock (which, until the white variety
appeared, was called simply the Plymouth Rock) was the first
thoroughbred fowl presenting the combination of characteristics
more satisfactory to the farmer than what he secured from either
the native stock or the indiscriminate mixture of breeds which
popular authorities favored. The result was that, in all parts of the
country, people who before had held aloof from ‘fancy ’’ breeds
began to breed the Plymouth Rock. The appearance of a stable
type suiting the general idea gave a tremendous impetus to
poultry culture.
After the Plymouth Rock came other varieties and breeds differ-
ing from it in color of plumage or in shape of comb, or varying
somewhat from its size, shape, and weight, but still of the general
type of fowl best adapted to the production of both eggs and meat
and to the conditions under which most poultry is kept for profit.
The Asiatic type continued to be bred, especially where large fowls
for the table were wanted ; and the Leghorn, the most serviceable
European type, was improved in this country and became an
important factor in the extension of interest in improved stock,
especially where eggs were the most important product.
Artificial incubation. The hatching of eggs by artificial means
has been practiced in Egypt and China from very early times.
This fact and something of the methods used by these peoples
have long been known, but the methods used were not adapted
either to the conditions of the industry in Europe and America or
to the habits and temperament of occidental races. Incubators of
the types found practicable for general use were first introduced
about 1875. The machines of that period have never been sur-
passed for efficient work when skillfully handled, but their manage-
ment was too difficult for the average operator.
Toward 1890 more perfectly regulated machines appeared, and
the incubator began to come into general use and to have a pro-
nounced effect on the development of the industry. In the next
ten years more marked improvements in the construction of incu-
bators easy of operation were made. These improvements and the
development of more practicable methods of artificial brooding
made possible the production of poultry on a much larger scale
than had ever been attempted before. Though that was the feature
18 POULTRY CULTURE
of the use of artificial methods which most fired the imaginations
of those considering the financial possibilities of poultry culture, and
though, in a limited way and in a few lines, the scale of operations
with poultry has been greatly enlarged by the use of artificial
methods, they are more generally valuable as supplementing natural
methods than as a substitute for them.
Exhibitions. The first public exhibition of poultry in America
was held in the Public Garden in Boston, in 1849. This exhibition,
more than any other one event, gave impetus to the growing excite-
ment over remarkable kinds of poultry. In England, a few years
earlier, a great poultry show had been held in the Crystal Palace,
London. Both of these shows were noteworthy for the number and
variety of exhibits which they contained. Each in its own country
may be said to mark, as exactly as such a change can be marked, the
end of the ancient and the beginning of the modern period in poultry
culture. With them began the organization of poultry interests.
Following them, organizations of poultrymen multiplied, and shows
were held in many places. In the United States the Civil War
drew attention for a while from such interests, but hardly had
hostilities ceased when the interest in poultry began to be active.
Poultry exhibitions, both separately and as an adjunct of agri-
cultural fairs, have been one of the most important factors in the
development of the industry.
Poultry literature of the early period. Before 1815, when
Moubray’s first book appeared, the only books in the English lan-
guage exclusively on poultry were a few treatises on gamecocks
and cock fighting, and the work of Mascall, published in 1581.
Moubray’s book went through a number of editions and seems to
have met the popular demand for twenty years or more. Then, just
as the period was closing, a number of books appeared. Between
1840 and 1860, and especially in the ten years from 1845 to 1855,
were issued more books undertaking a complete presentation of
the subject of poultry culture than were produced in the following
half-century. Compared with this output the latter period seems
strangely barren of books, but a full analysis of poultry literature
shows that the books which came out so rapidly, and relatively in
such abundance, at the beginning of the modern period, are really
the posthumous literature of the early period. Their influence on
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 19
the development of the industry is practically negligible. They are
best appreciated when considered as the concluding records of the
early period. The merely curious reader, more impressed by what
is odd than by what is familiar, may think he finds in them a great
many errors now obsolete. The close student, acquainted with
modern developments, is much more impressed by the practical
knowledge of poultry culture in earlier times. To him the most un-
satisfactory thing about these books is the faultiness of their descrip-
tions of breeds, names and terms being used so carelessly that the
identity of the birds alluded to is often doubtful. Their weakness
in this particular is one of the chief sources of confusion in regard
to the genesis of modern breeds and types.
Modern poultry literature. As we have seen that the book
literature of the early period overlapped the beginnings of the
modern period, so we find the beginnings of modern literature
taking form in the closing years of the early period. The agri-
cultural papers, established a little earlier, furnished the natural
medium through which poultry keepers exchanged information and
ideas, and made the first steps toward transfers of stock. At first,
references to poultry matters in these papers were brief and inter-
mittent, but before long many of them regularly devoted special
space to poultry, —a practice still continued. The most intense
interest in poultry, however, was not among agriculturists but
among dwellers in towns and cities. As many of these people were
but slightly interested in other agricultural subjects, and as those
especially interested in poultry, whether in town or country, wanted
more information on the subject than the agricultural paper could
give them, papers devoted especially to poultry, or to poultry, pigeons,
and pet stock, began to appear.
Journalism. The poultry press has been a unique factor in the
development of the industry. The great number of periodicals
devoted to this subject has often been cited as an illustration of the
wealth-producing capacity of a specialty which could support so
many more papers than any other of its class. As a matter of fact,
in only a small proportion of cases has the support given these
papers been sufficient to make them profitable to their publishers,
with most of whom the publication of a poultry paper has been a
side issue. But, regardless of its financial value to proprietors, the
20 POULTRY CULTURE
poultry press collectively has been a highly efficient organ for the
distribution of detailed information about every phase of poultry
culture. On the whole, it has been a rather indiscriminate purveyor
of information, exploiting all sorts of ideas and articles without in-
quiring too closely into their merits. As a rule, it has been more
prone to fall in with the delusions of the public than to make
careful inquiries as to facts.
In all these things it has simply reflected, on a larger scale and
publicly, the merits and the faults of the average poultry enthusiast,
who conceives it his duty to spread the interest in poultry culture
as far and as fast as possible. Whatever may be said of the moral-
ity of this sort of exploitation, or of the losses to individuals that it
causes, in considering factors in the development of the poultry
industry this must be reckoned as one of the most potent. It is
impossible to make any accurate estimate of the numbers of people
who have gone into poultry keeping with exaggerated ideas of
the profits to be realized, who would never have been interested
in it to that extent had they known the truth, but who, once in
it, remained until they had made a success, though not of the
proportions they had anticipated.
The poultry press has literally spread broadcast, as fast as it came
to light, every bit of knowledge and every idea on the subject ; but
generally so discursively, and with so little effort to suppress mis-
leading or superfluous matter, that those who went to papers for
information were likely to turn from them in confusion. The situa-
tion created by so active an agency, constantly extending interest
in the subject yet never satisfying the curiosity created, greatly
stimulated the demand for books which would systematically pre-
sent the essentials of the subject.
Books. With a few exceptions, recent books have been either
monographs or symposia on special subjects. Some of those de-
signed to cover the subject completely are really collections of several
essays on subjects in which the authors were specialists, with brief
and perfunctory treatments of such other topics as were taken up,
and with many important matters omitted. Some of the most pre-
tentious titles were given to works of small size and less importance.
While the need of comprehensive, authoritative works was every-
where recognized, and nearly every author confessed a purpose to
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 21
meet this demand, so little confidence had either authors or pub-
lishers in the permanent value of these books that in over forty
years there were issued, bound in boards, only three poultry
books by American authors.1 In all that time only one American
book (Felch’s ‘ Poultry Culture”) appeared which secured exten-
sive recognition as an authority. The favorite work with Ameri-
can poultry keepers was an English book, “ The Practical Poultry
Keeper,” by Lewis Wright. The information in this book was
not always adapted to American conditions, but the book as a
whole furnished the most complete and logical treatment of the
subject from a modern point of view, and as such had a great
influence.
It is not practicable here to go into a discussion of reasons for
the scarcity of good books by American authors, but one most
important reason should be mentioned. The common lack of
confidence in the permanent value of books written during this
period was due to the general recognition of the unsettled condi-
tion of the industry. This will be discussed more particularly in the
next chapter. The point of interest here is that, because of the
changes which have taken place, the literature of the first half-
century of the modern period has ceased to be serviceable for
instruction in so many particulars that the student of the subject,
reading those books to-day, needs constantly to guard against teach-
ings that progress has made obsolete. For this reason it is wise to
postpone acquaintance with the literature of that period until one
has acquired a fair general knowledge of present conditions and
practice, and is thus qualified to distinguish between what is obso-
lete and the considerable quantity of valuable matter to be found
in the literature of the period. A little of the same caution is
advisable even in the study of more recent literature, for some
writers on poultry draw more freely on past literature than on
current experience.
Instruction and investigation. Public educational and experi-
mental work was not seriously undertaken in America until near
the close of the nineteenth century. The very abundance and
1]. K. Felch, Poultry Culture; I. K. Felch, H. S. Babcock, and J. Henry Lee,
The Philosophy of Judging; The Standard of Perfection (published by the
American Poultry Association).
22 POULTRY CULTURE
breadth of periodical literature superficially meeting the demand
for information was in part responsible for this, but the principal
reason was that neither the general public nor the educators and
investigators had outgrown the old idea of the insignificance of
poultry. Though still in the rudimentary stages, these agencies
are already making an impression on the industry. Work in either
line requires, first of all, more careful consideration of facts than
has been usual among poultry keepers, the reduction of actual
knowledge to a form suitable for instruction, and a proper analy-
sis and summary of the known facts in any problem as a basis
for further investigation. The influence of these requirements is
already apparent in many directions.
Individual influence. In the developments of the modern period
personal taste and talent have figured on a much more extensive
scale than formerly, because modern conditions furnished a vastly
greater field for their exercise. One of the most notable differences
between the ancient and the modern period in poultry culture is
the difference in the relation toward poultry culture of men deeply
interested in it. The conditions of poultry production through-
out the whole of the early period were such that all poultry keepers
and fanciers, not excepting writers regarded as authorities on the
subject, were amateurs ; the opportunities open to the individual any-
where for exploiting his interest in poultry were too limited to admit
of making a trade or a profession of any line of work with poultry.
The conditions which brought about the rapid development of
the industry created a field for the profitable use of the knowledge
and skill of the poultryman. It became possible for men to make
a living by judging poultry and by writing for poultrymen, as well
as by breeding poultry. By their activities along these lines, and
in the opportunities that these incidentally gave them for meeting
people interested in the. subject over a very large territory, many
men have had great influence on the development of poultry inter-
ests. Hundreds of such men have been known throughout the
English-speaking world, and a lesser number more extensively.
This is in striking contrast to the former period, in which many
1 This statement may not apply strictly to a few producers in localities supply-
ing the markets of such cities as London, Paris, and New York, but we have no
certain knowledge of the fact as to these cases.
EVOLUTION OF THE POULTRY INDUSTRY 23
men must have been influential but few ever became known outside
of their own localities,
Trade spirit. Commercialism in modern poultry culture is often
denounced as the bane of the business. Such denunciations are
applied to all manifestations of the commercial element in practi-
cal as well as in fancy poultry culture. While it must be admitted
that the commercial spirit has developed grave abuses in both
lines, it must also be remembered that the whole structure of
modern poultry culture, with all its subsidiary industries, rests
on a commercial basis. Commercial opportunity brought about
the change from the old conditions, and has repeatedly opened
up new avenues for the extension of the industry. It is not pos-
sible here to discuss in detail the influence that the invention
and exploitation of articles used in poultry keeping has had upon
the industry, but a correct idea of the growth and status of the
industry requires recognition of the commercial spirit as an es-
sential element in present and future poultry culture.
CHAPTER III
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE
The first statistics of poultry. In the United States the first
enumeration of poultry was made in the census of 1840, and
covered only the number and value of the poultry. According to
this census the total’ value of all the poultry in the country was
$12,176,170... The eggs and other products were undoubtedly
worth enough more to make the aggregate $25,000,000. This
may be accepted as the best available estimate of the farm value of
poultry products at that time. In comparing these with later figures
the difference in the purchasing power of money must be taken
into account. It must also be considered that at that time much of
the country west of the Mississippi was little settled. In this census
report the state of Iowa, which now has an annual production about
equal to that of the whole country in 1840, is credited with poultry
1In “The American Poultry Book” (Harper & Brothers, New York, 1843) is
given (p.143) the following abstract from the returns made by the census of
1840, exhibiting the total value of all the poultry in the various states and territories
of the Union:
Stares VALUE STATES VALUE
Maine ; $123,171 | Ohio $734,931
New Hampshire 97,862 | Kentucky 534439
Vermont . 176,437 | Tennessee 8 581,531
Massachusetts 540,295 | Louisiana . one 273,314
Rhode Island 61,492 | Mississippi 369,481
Connecticut . 176,659 | Indiana 393,228
New York : 2,373,029 | Illinois 330,968
New Jersey 412,487 | Michigan . 82,730
Pennsylvania 1,033,072 | Arkansas . a 85% 93,549
Delaware . 47,465 | Florida (incomplete) 61,007
Maryland. . 219,159 | Wisconsin 16,167
Virginia ‘ 752,467 | Iowa —— 17,101
North Carolina . 544,125 | District of Columbia 3,092
South Carolina . so. §90,594 Total . $12,176,170
Georgia 473,158
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 25
to the value of only $17,101. In some of the older eastern states
the value of poultry given is so large as to indicate a considerable
development of interest in poultry some years before it began to
spread widely. Thus in New York the value of poultry products
in 1840 undoubtedly exceeded $5,000,000, and the annual produc-
tion of the Empire State at that time was greater than to-day in
Massachusetts.
Present value of poultry products in the United States. The
Department of Agriculture estimates the total production at about
$700,000,000 annually.! These figures, large as they seem, are
probably much below the actual value produced.2 They are very
freely quoted to show the magnitude of the poultry industry,
and comparisons with figures for other staples are often made,
showing a total value of poultry production in excess of that in
many other lines commonly supposed to be of greater importance.
These comparisons generally give distorted and exaggerated
views of the relative importance of poultry culture, suggesting
developments which in practice are difficult or impossible. While
large undertakings with poultry rarely succeed, the increase in
production due to a general extension of interest is often
amazing. In Kansas the average value of poultry and eggs
sold annually in the state for the five years ending with 1896
was $3,333,562. The value for 1897 was $3,850,997 ; the value
for 1907 was $10,300,082.
1 This is estimated on the returns of the United States census of 1900 and of
later figures for a number of states. So far as the author has been able to learn,
no full census of poultry has ever been taken in the United States. Statistics for
poultry have been taken as part of “statistics of the farm,” and no account has
been made of poultry not on farms or large plants. In Canada no general poultry
census has ever been taken.
2 An interesting and instructive exercise is to compute the cost of poultry con-
sumed in a country on an assumed per capita consumption. Thus, if the population
of the United States be taken as 90,000,000, and it be assumed that each individual
consumes one egg per day, and that the value of the eggs is but one cent each, it will
be found that the cost of supplying each resident of the United States with one egg
daily for a year is $328,500,000, — almost half of the estimated total production of
eggs and all kinds of poultry. Or, if it be assumed that the 90,000,000 people
represent 18,000,000 families of five persons each, and that each family con-
sumes weekly one chicken at a cost of twenty-five cents, it will be found that the
total cost of these chickens would be almost exactly one third of $700,000,000.
Such computations and comparisons enable one to realize what large figures
actually mean.
26 POULTRY CULTURE
The poultry industry. The production (for home use or sale) and
the sale of poultry products constitute the poultry industry. “ The
poultry business” is a term applied to poultry keeping on a scale
, large enough to make it the busi-
ness of one or more persons. The
greater part, probably over ninety
per cent, of all the poultry sold in
the United States is produced by
® poultry keepers who do not make a
_ business of poultry culture but keep
| poultry on a small scale while giving
we their attention chiefly to some other
' occupation, usually general farming.
As the figures of the early census
show, there was a poultry industry
of considerable proportions before the idea of developing poultry
culture as a business began to be entertained.
While the magnitude of the totals of volume and value of poul-
try products naturally suggests opportunity for the development of
poultry production on a large scale, with correspondingly large
profits, the fact that the
demand is so nearly met
by the produce of the
millions of small flocks
should be far more signif-
icant to those engaging
in large poultry-producing
enterprises. The poultry
industry as a whole is per-
manent. It includes (as
long as the business lasts)
every poultry business.
The stable factor in pro-
Fic. 1. Back-yard poultry keeping
(Photograph from A. T. Grosvenor)
‘ : Fic. 2. A back-yard poultry plant. House con-
duction is the farm flock, struction conforming to that of residence
the produce of which is
largely profit. The spectacular large enterprises rarely last long,
and their nominal contributions to poultry production often repre-
sent only a waste and loss of money earned in other occupations.
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 27
Trend of development. The natural tendency of the poultry in-
dustry is not to develop production on a large scale but to extend
and improve ordinary small operations as far as possible without
changing the position that they occupy as subordinate to the other
interests of the poultry keeper and to other uses of his land. The
general development of productive poultry culture proceeds accord-
ing to this tendency, with exceptions when local or temporary con-
ditions stimulate to specialization in poultry. In the distribution of
poultry products the natural tendency is toward concentration of
collections and trade and the building up of large businesses.
The natural division of the poultry industry. Trade conditions
separate the masses of producers and distributors (including collec-
tors), though a considerable number of individuals may combine
both functions. It is noteworthy that the greater number of “ mid-
diemen,” as well as of producers of poultry, handle poultry with
other lines, for this point is vital in plans for codperative market-
ing of poultry produce. It should also be observed that, both in the
combination of poultry production or selling with the production
or selling of other lines of produce, and in the division of labor
which makes one man a producer (of a variety of articles) and
another a dealer (in perhaps a similar variety of articles), economic
tendencies and laws operate to give individuals generally the
kind of work and the combination of lines which each can pur-
sue to the best advantage.
Limitations on development. The peculiar advantage of poultry
culture as an occupation for persons with small capital lies in its
limitations, — in the usual impossibility of developing productive
plants on a large scale. This is a line of production in which most
of the advantages are with the small operator, with whom it is an
avocation. It is a branch of agriculture requiring so little capital
for a beginning that even the poorest may make a start in it,
giving returns quickly and regularly, and capable of rapid exten-
sion within the limits favorable to economic production. Occasion-
ally these limits admit of the development of a poultry business,
but even then a business is developed only by those able to use the
opportunity. Many who do well with poultry on a small scale can-
not handle a large stock of poultry profitably, and so cannot use an
opportunity to build up a business when open to them. Usually
28 POULTRY CULTURE
natural and economic limitations so restrict operations that after a
little time the poultryman ceases to use his surplus earnings to
extend operations with poultry, and applies them to the develop-
ment of some other interest.
A farmer in New York state, who has become one of the
wealthiest men in his section, and whose reputation as a poultry
breeder is international, once told the author that, though he got
his start with poultry and had always made what poultry he kept
pay well, he would consider a poultryman very foolish who would
stick to poultry exclusively, even though making it pay well, be-
cause there are so many other lines in which money, ability, and
time may be used to better advantage.
Permanent poultry culture is a branch of agriculture. This
fact the poultry keeper and the student of poultry matters alike
should keep ever in mind. It is fundamental. Remarkable as has
been the growth of the industry in modern times, the financial losses
incidental to this growth have reached an enormous aggregate.
The greater part of the appalling total of losses in poultry keep-
ing could have been avoided if its true status had been generally
understood. Until very recently, the most conspicuous feature of
the exploitation of the industry was the widespread and persistent
effort to develop it artificially, — following manufacturing methods
and ideas.
The common result of the use of intensive methods on any con-
siderable scale was failure, — sometimes after temporary or partial
success had encouraged the poultryman to continue or perhaps to
increase operations. There were exceptions in a few lines (to be
’ Perhaps the best general illustration of this point that could be given is
afforded by the poultry industry in such European countries as France and Bel-
gium, which, though densely populated, export considerable quantities of poultry
and eggs. The interest of the peasants of these countries in poultry is often cited as
showing their appreciation of the possibilities of profit from poultry. As the matter
has usually been stated, it is made to appear that poultry culture is of paramount
interest in the lives of these peasants; but this is not the case. Its true status
was shown by M. Louis Vander Snickt in an address at the Second National
Poultry Conference, in England, in 1907, when he made the statement that
“the more careful and thrifty” of the Belgian people in the Campine country
ultimately ceased to breed poultry and engaged in horticulture. They made this
change not entirely because horticulture was more profitable, but because their
land, after long use for poultry, became unsuitable for poultry and adapted to
fruit growing, as it was not in the beginning.
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 29
described presently), and occasionally instances of individuals who,
because of special advantages, were able to make a living when the
majority failed, or because they were satisfied with simpler living.
The reasons for the persistence of efforts to establish poultry plants
on intensive lines, notwithstanding the failures, are briefly :
1. The prevailing tendencies of the times to extend the appli-
cation of mechanical ideas in all pursuits, to carry the division of
labor to an extreme, and to specialize in production.
2. That the greatest actual production is obtained by intensive
culture, and the common methods of reckoning profits make it
appear that profit is in proportion to production.
3. That large projects on this basis are extensively exploited in
print, both in advance of their establishment and while in opera-
tion, but notice of their abandonment is rarely published.
4. That persons becoming interested in the financial possibili-
ties of poultry keeping almost invariably turn from information or
advice not in accord with their wishes, and follow an alluring
counsel, regardless alike of the warnings of better authorities, of
the experience of others, and of their own common sense.
With such potent influences operating to induce men to exhaust
both capital and ingenuity before admitting that intensive methods
were not adapted to continuous poultry culture, the facts as to the
general status of the industry, though obvious when seen from a
right point of view, secured no wide recognition until the effort to
establish poultry culture on an intensive basis had passed its cul-
mination and the developments along natural lines had reached a
stage where a fair general comparison of results plainly showed
that permanent poultry culture must, as a rule, be part of a diver-
sified agriculture. The reasons for this will become apparent as
the subject is developed in this book.
Poultry culture is a necessary feature in agriculture. The
various kinds of poultry, alike in their general adaptability to the
land and to conditions of agricultural life, are so different in struc-
ture and habits that full utilization of the opportunities which a
farm affords for the profitable production of poultry nearly always
requires the keeping of more than one of the common kinds.
Often fowls, turkeys, ducks, and geese may all be kept to advan-
tage. When the area of land cultivated is too small to be called
30 POULTRY CULTURE
a farm, the best possible use of the land will still, in most instances,
require that some poultry be kept. On still smaller areas poultry
keeping may be carried on, but not on a scale or under condi-
tions which admit of maintaining a stock at normal vigor with-
out frequent renewals from outside sources where. conditions
are more favorable.
Poultry culture is a diversified industry. As a farm usually
affords opportunity for the production of the common kinds of
poultry, so in nearly all localities a demand is found for all kinds
of poultry products. In many places the local production of some
or all of these may be more than sufficient to meet the local de-
mand, and this is the case in most sections where agriculture is the
most important industry. In that event, production for shipment
may include all lines or be limited to a few or, in rare instances,
to one line, according to the requirements of available markets and
the adaptation of local conditions to special lines of production.
In manufacturing and mining sections, and in the vicinity of great
cities, the local production meets but a small part of the demand.
In such sections, and especially in the cities, there is apt to be a
large demand for poultry products of a kind or quality for which
the demand in small places is too limited to furnish inducements
to local producers. In the nonagricultural communities, too, the
bulk of the poultry products comes from a distance and is likely to
have deteriorated somewhat before reaching the consumer. Hence
near-by products of good quality command a premium. Under such
conditions specialization in poultry culture may be carried much far-
ther than is usually profitable, large farms may be devoted almost
wholly to poultry keeping, and, if climatic and soil conditions are
favorable, intensive practice may be followed for a long time with-
out marked unfavorable results.
Branches of poultry culture. It being understood that poul-
try keeping is rarely an exclusive business, and that in practice
two or more branches of poultry culture are usually combined,
the various lines may now be described. Poultry products may
be divided into two general classes, market products and fancy
products.
The market products of poultry are eggs and meat, with feathers
and manure as by-products,
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 31
Eggs used for food are almost wholly the eggs of fowls, the
proportion of eggs of ducks, geese, and turkeys. entering into
consumption being insignificant. The value of the annual pro-
duction of market eggs (mostly hens’ eggs) in the United States
equals or exceeds the total value of the meat product of fowls,
turkeys, ducks, and geese. The production of eggs for food is
the principal branch of poultry culture. With the vast majority
of poultry keepers it is the prime object, other lines being
incidental or supplementary. Under proper conditions even a
very moderate egg yield will return a fair profit anywhere.
Fic. 3. An egg farm near Boston, on which the long houses, without yards, are
grouped near the dwelling, and the fowls range over the farm
Poultry meat used for food is produced principally from fowls,
though large quantities of all other kinds of poultry are used. The
bulk of the crop of fowls and chickens marketed each year is inciden-
tal to egg production to this extent : Most farmers and poultry keep-
ers maintain laying flocks of about the same numbers, or slightly
increasing, from year to year. To keep these flocks at the most
profitable stage of productiveness it is necessary to renew annually
from one half to nearly the entire number (according to the breed).
The cockerels not required for breeding and the old stock to be
turned off make up the most of the meat of the fowls used for
food. A large part of this stock is turned off at the convenience
of the producer, without regard to market conditions or demands.
To supply special demands, particularly at seasons when there is
32 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 4. A New England town poultry plant built up in spare time
Note the variety in houses
little poultry on the market and prices are high, poultry keepers
favorably located engage in specialties like the growing of broilers
and roasters.
Egg farming the most important branch of poultry culture. As
has been stated, the production of eggs is carried on principally as an
incidental line in general farming. In most cases the farm flocks
of poultry are maintained primarily to supply the- household with
eggs and meat, the products marketed being the surplus remaining
Fic. 5. Intensive plant on a Philadelphia business man’s country place
Land area small; investment large; labor costly
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 33
after home wants are satisfied. Ordinary farm conditions and
methods need not be described here, but some of the special
developments along this line must be described as to their general
features, though discussion of these features will come more appro-
priately under special topics.
Factory methods in poultry culture. The intensive poultry
plant devoted primarily to egg production, with the sale of market
poultry and often of thoroughbred stock and eggs for hatching as
accessories, was long the most conspicuous type of plant classed as
Fic. 6. Poultry plant of A. G. Duston, at Marlboro, Massachusetts. Considered
a model plant when built, about 1890. Used about ten years, then moved to
South Framingham, Massachusetts, and rebuilt on an extensive plan. (Photo-
graph from Mr. JDuston)
an ‘egg farm.’ This may be briefly described as an enlargement
of the city poultry yard. The common object was to keep the
largest possible number of fowls on a given area, keeping them
closely confined and supplying them with all kinds of food needed.
Usually the land accommodations were very limited, and the poul-
tryman made no effort to grow any food — except perhaps a little
green food-——or to make any use of his land except for poultry.
This was the typical plant, in area from two to ten or twelve
acres. Often the larger plots had little more actual capacity than
34 POULTRY CULTURE
plots of less than half their size, because the character of much of
the land made it impossible to use it with this system. These plants,
almost without exception, used artificial methods of hatching and
brooding. On many of them the young chickens were grown
under conditions not much better than those to which the old
stock were subjected. On others conditions for the young stock
were made as favorable as available land would permit. Those
operating such plants generally considered it necessary to renew
practically the entire stock each year. Hence it was necessary
to grow each year about twice as many chicks as there were old
birds on the place, which is difficult to do in a restricted area.
Fic. 7. The poultry plant on a fine estate at Goshen, New York, combining
both intensive and extensive features. Buildings very expensive. (Photograph
from Willowcrest Farm)
On large intensive plants it was necessary that much of the labor
employed should be skilled labor, — expert in handling poultry
under highly artificial conditions and in the use of artificial methods
of hatching and brooding. Plants of this type were most numerous
from 1890 to 1900, and were a conspicuous feature in southern
New England throughout that period. Elsewhere they were not so
numerous, though the total number throughout the country was
very large. The prosperity of these plants was generally fictitious.
Most of them were short-lived. In many instances good profits were
made for a year or perhaps a short series of years, but, for reasons
which will be stated in the discussion of systems, prosperity was
ephemeral in all but a few cases. Unbiased persons familiar with
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE = 35
the poultry industry now generally agree that this type of plant
cannot be maintained on a large scale continuously.
Farm methods. Egg farming by the colony system has been
developed on an extensive scale in the district about Little Comp-
ton, Rhode Island. The colony plan is used to some extent in
other places, but in this district almost every farm makes the
keeping of poultry for eggs a specialty, and all use the same plan
of housing, and in general the same methods.
By the colony plan the stock of fowls is distributed over the land
in small flocks. Ideally the system is to move the houses at least
once a year, but in practice they are usually allowed to remain in
one place much longer. That, however, is largely dependent upon
the convenience of the farmer and upon other uses which he may
wish to make of the land. Land good for other purposes is not as
likely to be continuously occupied by poultry as land which cannot
be advantageously cropped. No fences are used.2 The houses are
frequently placed in pastures, and it is not unusual to see fowls,
geese, and cattle in the same pasture. Houses may be only a few
rods apart, or there may be but four or five houses (each holding
about thirty-five birds) on as many acres of land. The usual prac-
tice is to renew about half the stock each year. This requires the
rearing of not many more chickens each year than there are old
1 A great many persons who profess to be, or are by some considered, competent
to speak on this point may still be found who will assert that this statement is
incorrect, and cite instances of large intensive plants said to be financially success-
ful. To the author as a poultry journalist trying to learn and make public the
truth about such things, these plants and the claims made for them were trouble-
some, until he adopted the plan of declining to accept the existence of such plants
as proof of the value of their methods unless the plants had been in operation
under the same ownership for ten years. Other tests might have been applied,
but this was found sufficient. With the exceptions to be noted in this chapter,
instances of large intensive poultry plants in operation for ten years under the
same management are very rare. Of those started with large capital not one (so
far as the writer can remember or learn) lasted so long. This fact puts the bur-
den of proof on those who claim to succeed by such methods. The reader, if not
convinced, by what he learns of the principles of poultry keeping, that such claims
are not valid, should at least decline to accept them until they are established by
evidence beyond dispute. As a rule the reports and financial statements put out
are incomplete, inadequate, and therefore essentially false.
2 Except when pullets are first put in the large colony houses, when a small
yard is made, of stakes and poultry netting, to keep them from wandering off
before they become wonted to the house.
Fic. g. One of the low houses in Fig. 8. When cattle are in the pasture the
fence is adjusted to keep them trom the hens’ food and water
Fic. 10, Colony poultry houses on the farm of F. W. C. Almy,
Tiverton Four Corners, Rhode Island
FEATURES OF THE COLONY SYSTEM OF EGG FARMING
36
3
Fig. it. William Sisson'’s dough cart on its morning round, Note the rocky land
Kia. 12. Coops fer young chickens on the farm of F.W.C. Almy. The hens are
confined to the coeps until the chickens no Jonger need brooding
Fic. 13. George Butler’s dough cart returning from the evening
collection of eggs
FEATURES OF THE COLONY SYSTEM OF EGG FARMING
BP
Fic. 14. Skids attached to front gear of wayon used for moving colony
poultry houses
Fro. 15. Bank of outdoor nests for setting hens, at north side of building in Fig. 14
Fic. 16. Cookhouse, with drive through and feedhouse adjoining; a colony’
house at right
FEATURES OF THE COLONY SYSTEM OF EGG FARMING
38
Vic. 17. \ comman style of coup Fic. 18. A stack gives shade at
for chickens all times
Vic, 19. Old-style coop, without Fic. 20, Cookhouse on the farm
windows of FLWLC. Almy
Fic. 21. Bricked-up set-kettle for Fic. 22. Pullets confined when first
cooking feed put in laying houses
FEATURES OF THE COLONY SYSTEM OF EGG FARMING
39
40 POULTRY CULTURE
birds on the place. Natural methods of incubating and brooding
are used almost exclusively. The greater part of the grain is pur-
chased, though nearly every farmer grows a few hundred bushels
of corn each year. Inexpert labor is largely used, and much of
the work is done with horse and wagon.
By the methods thus briefly outlined, the farmers of this section
make ‘‘egg farming” continuously profitable, though the average
profit on a “ per hen” basis is small.?
The Petaluma district in California. This is better known, by
name and reputation, to the general public, and perhaps also to
most poultry keepers, than the district just described, though it may
be doubted? whether the developments there are of as great im-
portance. In many respects Petaluma conditions and methods are
almost opposite those used in the Rhode Island colony section. In
the Rhode Island district natural methods and primitive appliances
are used almost exclusively ; the Petaluma industry is developed
along artificial lines and uses an intensive system. Producing for
a market which prefers a white egg, it uses the White Leghorn, as
do the egg farms supplying the New York market. The farms are
mostly small, —from five to tenacres. Instead of small houses placed
far apart, larger houses in groups are used. Hatching is done largely
by men who make a business of hatching chicks for others. The
chicks are brooded in lots of many hundreds. An incubator
1It is generally difficult to get exact figures. I have been told of profits as
high as $1.50 per hen for flocks of 400 to 500, but for the flocks of double those
numbers and upwards the best estimates I can get from the farmers place average
profits estimated on the “per hen ” basis at about So cents (a head) above the cost of
feed. The routine work of caring for 1200 to 1500 laying hens takes about three or
four hours of the time of an unskilled laborer, employed at $20 or $25 per month,
with board. Irregular work for the poultry probably brings this up to make the lay-
ing hens chargeable for about half the wages of the man who cares for them. Other
common sources of income on these farms are from cockerels and old hens
marketed, from geese, from cows, and from the sale of hay. Thus the net cash
income on a farm operated by one man, with one laborer regularly employed and
occasional day help, may be very much larger than that of the average farmer any-
where. One farmer in this district, who maintains a stock of about 2000 laying hens
and gives little attention to geese or cows, has made the statement that for a num-
ber of years he has been able to live well and still save not less than $1000 a year.
2 Not being personally acquainted with the Petaluma district, I can make no
positive statements in regard to the conditions there. Accounts of it by different
persons are generally more or less contradictory, and accounts by the same person
are sometimes inconsistent.
Fic. 25. Twenty-five hundred fowls on seven acres. (Photograph by D. J. Lane)
FEATURES OF THE PETALUMA POULTRY DISTRICT
41
Vic. 26. Fowls on range. (Photegraph by 1). J. Lane)
Tie. 27. Brooder houses used at Petaluma. (Photouraph by M.A. Tull)
Fic. 28. Brooder stove to provide Fic. 29. As high as 400 cases of eggs
heat for 1600 chicks. (Photograph a day shipped from this store. (Photo-
by D. J. Lane) graph by D. J. Lane)
FEATURES OF THE PETALUMA POULTRY DISTRICT
42
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 43
manufacturer has been the moving spirit in the development of this
industry here, and, like most far-western districts famed for any
product, it has been widely exploited by real-estate interests. While
the product is different, the egg farms of Petaluma in several im-
portant respects resemble the soft-roaster! farms of New England
mentioned a little farther on. On general principles, as observed
in developments elsewhere, it may fairly be presumed that, while
the general accounts of, and claims for, the industry in the Peta-
luma district, and for the methods used there, are somewhat
exaggerated, the industry as developed there suits the existing
conditions and gives good profits to a fair proportion of those en-
gaging in it. How long the present methods will continue will
depend on developments beyond the district quite as much as on
conditions in it. Almost invariably, specializing in poultry keeping
succeeds only for a short time, the success of the specialist stimu-
lating farmers generally to give more attention to that line, and
so to increase the supply and reduce the profits of the specialist.
Experience in other places also indicates that after a time the
intensive methods used at Petaluma must be modified.
Broiler farming. Broiler growing as a specialty began to attract
a great deal of attention about 1890. Interest developed at that
period as a result of sensational stories published about the extent
of operations in this line in and about Hammonton, New Jersey, and
the large profits obtained. Broiler growing in this vicinity has been
carried on principally as a winter occupation by men engaged in
fruit culture, gardening, or other work which did not require all
their time at that season. Their operations were not usually on
a large scale. So conducted, the ‘‘ business’’ brought the broiler
grower some income at a time when he had little from other sources.
When his results were unusually good, and he caught the market
right, his profits might be considerable, but the average profit as
stated by growers who kept careful accounts was only about twenty
cents a bird. Instances were cited in the early days of as high as
$400 profit in one season on a broiler plant of 1000 capacity run
for seven months in the year.
4 Chickens specially grown to be marketed as roasters are disposed of by the
growers while the flesh is soft; hence the term “ soft roaster,” distinguishing such
from the ordinary roasting chickens, which are often hard-meated.
44 POULTRY CULTURE
The facts about the broiler business at Hammonton were widely
published, but as usual the fictions gained wider credence, and
for some ten or fifteen years big broiler plants were built up in
various parts of the country, many of them undertaking to pro-
duce broilers the year round. None of these plants succeeded,
Fic. 30. Soft-roaster plant of Farrer Brothers, West Norwell, Mass.
and some of them involved their owners in heavy losses. The
most celebrated broiler plant was that known as the ‘“ Mary L.
Poultry Plant,” at Sidney, Ohio. It is said that the owner
admitted having lost over one hundred thousand dollars on
the plant, and it is commonly believed among poultrymen that
his losses were very much larger. In recent years few efforts
Fic. 31. Part of soft-roaster plant of Henry D. Smith, Hanover, Mass.
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE = 45
have been made to
establish plants exclu-
sively for the produc-
tion of broilers. Broiler
growing is now gener-
ally assigned its proper
place, as a feature in
diversified poultry cul-
ture or as a specialty
for persons whose regu-
lar occupation will al-
low them to engage
in the production of
broilers in winter.
Roaster growing. A
special phase of poul-
try culture is the grow-
Fic. 32. Fifty half-grown Light Brahma chickens in
house 6 ft. x 8 ft, which they occupy from wean-
ing to maturity. The plan works well for winter
chickens marketed before hot weather
ing of large roasting chickens for the early summer trade in the large
cities and pleasure resorts. It has been carried on for a great many
years in a small way, chiefly by people in the vicinity of Philadel-
phia, its standing with those engaged in it being much the same as
that of broiler growing. The roasters grown in this vicinity became
Fic. 33. Colony houses for winter chickens. (Continuing Fig. 31)
Fig. 38. Colony house for winter Fic. 36. Colony house for winter
chickens, used by Farrer Brothers chickens, used by Il. 1D. Smith
Fic. 37. Row of colony houses for winter chickens on the farm of
E. O. Damon, Hanover, Mass.
FEATURES OF THE SOUTH SHORE SOFT-ROASTER DISTRICT
40
Fic. 39. Incubater cellar built into
abank on plant of Samuel Bates,
West Norwell, Vlass.
Fru. 38. Colony house for winter
chickens, used by J. Tf. Curtiss,
West Norwell, Mass.
Fic. 42. Oil barrel and tank connect
with faucet inside. (Rear of Fig. 41)
Fic. 41. H. D. Smith’s incubator cellar;
only the roof aboveground
FEATURES OF THE SOUTH SHORE SOFT-ROASTER DISTRICT
47
48 POULTRY CULTURE
famous in Philadelphia and other large eastern cities as ‘‘ Phila-
delphia chickens.” It seems probable that this line was carried on
in the same way by a few people near other large cities in the East,
though nothing definite can be learned. A few years previous to
1890 it began to develop ona more extensive scale in the vicinity of
Norwell, Rockland, Hanover, and other towns in what is known as
the South Shore district of eastern Massachusetts, and soon many
people in these towns were engaged in it, some on a small scale,
as a side line, others giving their time wholly to it and grow-
ing from 2000 to 4000 or 5000 chickens each year. The profits
on this line of production were considerable, usually estimated at
one dollar per bird, and sometimes a great deal more than that on
the smaller lots.
The success of the business in this district has induced many
to come here to engage in it, and has led others to attempt it
elsewhere. Efforts to develop this line as a specialty outside the
district! have almost invariably been discontinued at an early stage
because of the difficulty of getting fertile eggs for hatching at
the season at which they are required. Newcomers in the dis-
trict experience some of the same difficulty, because the most
reliable supplies are, as a rule, known and engaged by the growers
acquainted with the farmers who supply the eggs. The grower
in the district also has an important advantage in the market-
ing of his product,—a point which will be more fully considered
when the matter of cooperation in selling is discussed. Artificial
methods of incubating and brooding are used by all growers
producing any considerable number of chickens, and skill in
handling incubators and brooders is a most important element
in success in this line.
Duck growing. This is the one branch of poultry culture in
which plants of large capacity have been successfully developed.
Factory methods have been applied much more satisfactorily in
duck growing than in any other line of poultry culture. There are
1 From the quantities of soft roasters now coming to Boston in small lots,
it appears that an increasing number of poultrymen in other places in the
vicinity are growing this class of poultry on a small scale, with other poultry
lines. The effect of such a development on the industry in the soft-roaster
section remains to be seen.
Fic. 43. Duck farms at Speonk. Long Island. The UWallock farm No. 1 in the
foreground: in the distance, the Wilcox farm
Fra. 44. Another view of Fig. 43. There are 25.000 to 30.c00 ducks in sight
Fic. 45. Ducklings on Hallock duck farm No. Center Moriches, Long Island
VIEWS OF LONG ISLAND DUCK FARMS
49
50 POULTRY CULTURE
two principal reasons for this. In the first place ducks are not as
sensitive to the effects of filth in their food or on the land that they
occupy as are fowls. In the second
place they are less disposed to
quarrel among themselves than
fowls, turkeys, and geese. There
are many plants in the eastern
states growing from 5000 to
10,000 or 12,000 ducks a year,
a number growing up to 20,000,
so and some with an annual pro-
Fic. 46. Feeding young ducks from duction of over 50,000. One
track over pa at Hallock duck man on Long Island operates
arm No. I
two farms, the combined annual
output of which is about 75,000 to 80,000. Duck growing as a
specialty is the production of ‘ green’’ ducks, — that is, young
ducks killed at about ten weeks
of age, when they should weigh,
dressed, five to six pounds each.
Much of the weight at this
stage is soft fat, which cooks
away, but the epicures in the
cities will pay as much for the
duck at this age as later, when
a greater proportion of the
weight is meat, and the profit
in ducks for market is in the
“green” duck.!
This line of duck growing
is said to have been conducted
on a relatively large scale on
Long Island since before 1860. | :
The breed of ducks used prior :
to the introduction of the Pekin F!6- 47. Track through feed room at
duck was the White Muscovy. Seneca ee
Until about 1891 or 1892 the ducklings were hatched with hens,
and the largest growers raised only a few thousand. Then artificial
a Ss
1 The marketmen say, “The green duck is a gold brick.”
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 51
methods were introduced. Since that time the business has devel-
oped, sometimes to the numbers mentioned above, on a great
many farms here and on some in other sections. The Long Island
OO.
Fic. 48. View of Weber Brothers’ duck farm, Wrentham, Mass.
duck farms are quite invariably located on streams, with yards
for both breeding stock and growing ducklings extending into the
water. The inland duck farms usually give the ducks no water
Fic. 49. Breeding stock at Weber Brothers’ duck farm
except for drinking purposes.1 From observation of conditions
and methods on coast and inland duck farms the author is of the
1 Mr. James Rankin, in his “* Duck Culture” (1897 edition), stated that his ducks
seemed to have lost all desire for water for other purposes than drinking, and even
the texture of their feathers seemed changed so that they would no longer shed
water. I did not find this the case with stock bought of Mr. Rankin. It took to
the water at the first opportunity as readily as any.
Fra. si. Buby ducks (one week old} FG. 52. Baby ducks (two wecks old)
Fic. 53. Cold brooder house. (Ducklings three weeks old)
BROODER HOUSES AT WEBER BROTHERS’ DUCK FARM
52
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 53
opinion that ducks are grown with less labor on the coast farms ;
but it would be a very difficult matter to determine any point of
this kind in a comparison which, to be accurate, would have to con-
sider the personalities of the proprietors, as well as other points
Fic. 54. Fattening sheds at Weber Brothers’ farm. (From the east)
affecting results. Some of the coast farms have been used for duck
growing for over half a century, and some of the largest inland farms
for twenty-five or thirty years. When developed on a very large
Fic. 55. Fattening sheds seen in Fig. 54. Five thousand ducks feeding.
(From the west)
scale, duck growing is usually an exclusive business. On a smaller
scale it is usually combined with other branches of poultry culture.
‘As might be inferred from the comparative ease of developing
the business, it is the branch of poultry culture in which supply
54 POULTRY CULTURE
oftenest overtakes demand. While the demand grows steadily,
production constantly tends to more rapid increase. As a result,
in the history of duck growing there has been, at quite regular
intervals, an overproduction followed by a temporary curtailment
of operations. While large duck plants flourish only near the
markets where the demand is good, producers of market poultry
—
Fic. 56. Central grain storehouse Fic. 57. Section of house for breeders
—
Fic. 58. Section of a fattening shed Fic. 59. Killing and packing house
BUILDINGS ON WEBER BROTHERS’ DUCK FARM
everywhere find sale for some ducks at good prices, and when
good ducks are placed on a market, the demand rapidly increases.
Goose growing. Though less general than the growing of
ducks, goose growing is carried on by a few people in almost
every community. Throughout the greater part of the country,
geese are grown in these scattered (and usually small) flocks,
mainly for the Christmas market. In some parts of the East,
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 55
notably in Rhode Island and parts of southeastern Massachusetts,
the growing of ‘‘ green” geese, to be marketed at about twelve
weeks of age, is extensively carried on, almost every farm in a
community growing geese, and the number of goslings grown
on a farm sometimes reaching four or five hundred, though the
average is perhaps less than half as many.
The colony egg-farming district of Rhode Island is perhaps
the most important goose-growing district in the United States.
Goslings are usually hatched by hens (few men have succeeded
Fic. 60. Flock of breeding geese in a Rhode Island pasture
(Photograph from Isaac Wilbour)
in hatching the eggs by artificial means), and the large stocks of
laying hens kept here and the considerable areas of pasture land
available for the goslings make the conditions especially favorable
for goose growing on a larger scale than is usual. It is probable
that this branch of the industry could be much more extensively
developed in many localities than it is, for the demand is increas-
ing, and good geese bring high prices not only at the holiday
season but, in more limited quantities, at other seasons.
Goose fattening as a special line is carried on by some men in
goose-growing districts, and also by some near the large eastern
Pic. 61. Hen with brood of goslings Fre. G2. ‘Phree-weeks goslinys grazing
Pic. 63. Captive wild geese with Fig. G4. Wild gander, \frican goose,
goslings and mongrel goslings
Fic. 65. Geese and fowls in same Fic. 66. Feeding and watering
pasture fattening geese
FEATURES OF GOOSE GROWING IN NEW ENGLAND
56
Fic. 69. Fattening geese in pens on the Austin Farm
SCENES ON GOOSE-FATTENING FARMS
57
58 POULTRY CULTURE
cities who are engaged in buying and dressing poultry. The
tendency, however, is for growers to fatten their own geese, hence
the fatteners use mostly geese from districts where growers are
rather indifferent to market demands.
Turkey growing. Although much more generally engaged in
than goose growing, turkey culture is another branch never devel-
oped on a large scale. Unlike the other lines mentioned, special
Fic. 70. Bronze turkeys in woods at Fic. 71. Turkey roost in shelter of
Simsbury, Connecticut. (Photograph barn, on the Horace Miner Farm,
from Valley Farm) Westerly, Rhode Island
Fic. 72. A family of White Holland Fic. 73. A family of Black Norfolk
turkeys turkeys
attention to turkey growing is oftenest found in the western states,
and production in the East steadily decreases. This is due partly to
changed labor conditions and partly to the fact that the large farms
of the West afford conditions more favorable to the keeping of large
flocks of turkeys. It is quite commonly believed that the decline
of turkey growing in the East, and especially in Rhode Island and
eastern Connecticut, where it was once an important industry, is
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 59
due to the prevalence of the disease known as blackhead. That
this view is erroneous is evident from the fact that, though the
industry has declined in districts that once produced many turkeys,
a number of persons continue to grow them as successfully as ever.
The greater part of the annual turkey crop now comes from
the Central West and the mountain regions of the South, where,
though they are grown in smaller flocks, the total production is
large. Vermont and parts of New York and Pennsylvania produce
large quantities of turkeys. In the situations most favorable to it
the turkey lives largely by foraging in the fields and woods beyond
the range usually covered by fowls. Turkeys may be grown in
confinement, but not profitably. The conditions most favorable to
their production include good range, little restriction on their move-
ments, and still enough attention to provide for all their wants and
insure protection from their enemies.!
Other kinds of poultry. Peafowls, guineas, pheasants, swans,
and ostriches are not of general economic importance, though
there are a few breeders of pheasants and ostriches growing them
on quite a large scale.
Fancy poultry. Breeding fancy poultry is principally the pro-
duction of fow/s for exhibition. The interest in other kinds of poul-
try for this purpose is far less general and less intense. As a
rule, competition in turkeys, ducks, and geese is not keen. In the
rarer varieties there is almost no competition, most of the displays
being for exhibition only. They are rarely seen except at shows
of considerable importance, and even the managers of these often
find it difficult to get as many of them as they wish, to add to the
variety of the exhibit.
1 Thave made several visits to the turkey-growing district about Westerly, Rhode
Island, and have interviewed many turkey growers there and in other parts of the
East in regard to the causes of the decline in turkey growing in this section. The
views of two middle-aged women who had been successful turkey growers from girl-
hood seem to me to sum up the matter. One of these, when asked what difference
there was between her methods and those of her unsuccessful neighbors, who
averred that she knew the secret of raising turkeys, said, “ The only difference
I can see is that I am more careful to look after my turkeys in bad weather, when
they need attention.” The other, when asked to what she attributed the decline in
turkey growing, replied, ‘The men on the farms are now more interested in
other things, especially gardening, while the girls as they grow up usually leave
the farm and go to work in city stores or in factories or hotels; so that the class
of labor that was abundant years ago is now almost gone.”
60 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 74. A pheasantry in the suburbs of Boston. (Photograph from
E. F. Conness)
The breeding of fowls for fancy points engages the attention
of many thousands of people. The greater number of these breed
on a small scale and primarily for their own pleasure and recrea-
tion, but many give all their time to it and have considerable capi-
tal invested in the business. Nearly all make some effort to sell
——— . stock and eggs for
JA a! hatching. The profits
a1 wan in this line of poultry
culture are much less
than is generally sup-
posed. Competition is
strong and the cost of
doing business is large
in proportion to the
volume of business.
The seasons for the
Fic. 75. Breeding pens of pheasants and fowls sale of stock and eggs
in same yard
are short, and sales
are much affected by outside influences. Only a small proportion
of breeders engaged in this line make more than a living, and a
considerable number of the breeders most prominent at any time
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 61
are men who are trying to build up a business on capital accumu-
lated from something else. No business started in this way has
ever continued long. As in “ practical’”’ poultry keeping, those
who succeed are men who have built up a business from small
beginnings and understand it thoroughly. The others usually lose
money a great deal faster than the successful ones make it. It is not
unusual for men with capital, embarking in fancy poultry culture, to
sink in a year an amount which would represent more than the total
wealth of most poultrymen who are making money with poultry.
Fic. 76. Young China pheasants. (Photograph from Simpson’s Pheasant
Farm, Corvallis, Oregon)
Profitable combinations in poultry culture. Combinations are
usually made to suit the poultryman and his circumstances. As far
as the birds are concerned, with room and suitable locations and
arrangements for all, nearly all kinds might be kept on one tract
of land under one management. But poultry keepers are not equally
interested in or adapted to the different lines of work with poultry.
Whatever the original plan may be in any case, ultimately the work
is developed along the lines that the poultryman can make most
profitable, and usually consists of one principal line with several
others incidental. The combination of market and fancy poultry
62 POULTRY CULTURE
culture is general, sometimes one, sometimes the other, being of
primary importance. ee it is oftenest the market lines that
are considered first, but
if the poultryman de-
velops special skill as
a breeder and salesman,
the relative positions of
the two lines may soon
be reversed.
Profitable combina-
tions with poultry cul-
ture. Poultry culture
is a necessary feature in
diversified agriculture
Fic. 77. Colony of young pheasants in an oat field.
(Photograph from Simpson’s Pheasant Farm) that develops all the
possibilities of the or-
dinary farm. Poultry should be considered as a cvop which, accord-
ing to circumstances, may be grown in rotation with vegetable crops
or in a system of double cropping. All special branches of agricul-
ture afford opportunities for profitable combinations with poultry.
Supply and demand. To many the question of overproduction
seems a most important one. An industry open to every one and
capable of rapid exten-
sion from small begin-
nings appears at first
thought one in which
frequent periods of over-
production are likely to
occur. In general, how-
ever, such conditions
operate to check over-
production and, when
it does occur, to quickly
restore the balance be-
tween demand and sup- Fic. 78. Silver pheasant feeding. (Photograph
ply. There are other from Simpson’s Pheasant Farm)
factors, too, such as transportation and cold-storage facilities, which
have served to equalize demand and supply. An overproduction in
ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF POULTRY CULTURE 63
one locality, or an excess of receipts in one market, is always (if the
goods are in good condition) taken care of either by transfer to other
points or by storage until receipts decrease in volume. Again, since
so large a proportion of the general supplies of poultry and eggs sent
to the markets are the surplus of flocks kept primarily to supply
home requirements, any unusual reduction in prices is likely to be
promptly followed by increased home consumption, as well as by
increased market consumption, while on farms where the cost of
food is not an important item, large flocks may be held for weeks
or months. It is only in special lines like duck growing that
overproduction seriously affects growers. Even in these the effects
hardly ever continue for more than one season.
PART IT. PRODUCTION
CHAPTER IV
THE POULTRY KEEPER’S PROBLEMS
The poultry keeper, as distinguished from the breeder and
fancier, is the producer of poultry and eggs for table purposes,
either for home use or for market. Theoretically the poultry keeper
should be a breeder, if not a fancier; but as a matter of fact the
proportion who merit that description is insignificant. Broadly
considered, the function of the plain poultry keeper is to take the
ordinary stocks of poultry as they run, and produce from them the
poultry products that the country uses.
Common tasks of the poultry keeper are easy. In his routine
work he finds few things in themselves difficult. The troubles of
those who find poultry keeping an unending series of puzzling
problems are mostly due to efforts to get certain results with
factors which cannot give them, or by the use of unnecessarily
complicated methods.
Hard problems in poultry culture. The complex problems —
those which involve a number of comparatively simple matters
difficult to adjust to the end desired — are relatively hard. A few
examples will show the difference between common (or simple)
and complex problems.
The housing of an ordinary small flock is a simple problem.
Equally satisfactory results might be obtained in any of a dozen
different types of houses. The arrangement of the houses for a
large stock of fowls on a certain piece of land is a complex prob-
lem. The arrangement must be adapted to the lay of the land
and also to methods of feeding and management. Differences in
houses, also, which are immaterial when small numbers are kept
may have to be considered when many buildings are used. The
feeding of a flock of hens in laying condition is a simple matter ;
64
THE POULTRY KEEPER’S PROBLEMS 65
the handling of a stock of hens to have them in laying condition
when eggs are most in demand is a complex problem. Mating with
a view only to the reproduction of the species is an extremely
simple matter, accomplished by allowing males and females to come
together ; mating to preserve or improve breed or other desirable
characters is a highly complex problem.
Hard problems may be easy if worked out step by step. The
tendency of poultry keepers is to go too fast, and get into posi-
tions where they are confused by the variety of little problems
pressing for solution. It seems the hardest thing in the world
for enthusiasts beginning to specialize in this line to heed the
oft-repeated warning, to “ go slow.” When poultry is kept merely
from custom, and no special efforts are made to increase the flock,
natural and environmental causes and conditions codperate to keep
the numbers about the same from year to year, and the question
of taking care of a large increase hardly ever arises. But when
poultry are kept with a purpose, and for the greatest possible profit
under existing conditions, everything influencing the result sought
must be adapted and adjusted to it. In many cases preparation
for the work of one season must begin with the preceding season,
or even earlier. An unsuccessful hatching season will certainly
affect the egg crop of the next season, and may affect the breed-
ing and hatching results of the following year. Delay in getting
pullets into winter quarters may postpone laying for months.
Neglect to provide ample coop room for chickens as they grow may
cause heavy losses and retard the development of chicks that sur-
vive. A sick bird not promptly removed from the flock may spread
a contagious disease which will ruin, for breeding purposes, all birds
of the flock affeeted, even though they recover and may be used for
other purposes. Conditions over which the poultryman has no con-
trol, or only partial control, may also unfavorably affect his results.
With so many contingencies to consider, an experienced poul-
tryman rarely plans for a large increase, in one season, over the
preceding season. The novice who does so rarely succeeds in doing
more than make such advance as the expert would consider it wise
to project. Not infrequently he fails to maintain his original num-
bers, simply because he undertook more than he knew how to do
and look after every detail at the right time in the right way.
66 POULTRY CULTURE
Problems are simplified by keeping as close to natural conditions
as is consistent with the object sought. The application of this
precept is much wider than at first appears. It applies to stock, —
that is, to the type of bird; the ‘business type” of bird for any
purpose is a plain type — the original type improved and modified
with reference to use only. Large combs and crests, and feathers
on legs and feet, are superfluous features which complicate the
work of caring for the birds and limit their adaptability. It applies
to housing ; the house that provides only shelter from the elements
requires least attention from the keeper, and the fowls in it are
more thrifty. It applies to feeding ; under natural or approximately
natural conditions feeding ceases to be a problem. It applies to
breeding ; in nature the fittest to live survive to reproduce their
kind. The poultry keeper who systematically breeds from vigorous
birds retains and improves characters dependent upon constitutional
vigor much more surely than one who, in breeding for those charac-
ters, uses specimens in which they are more highly developed but
which are deficient in constitution. It applies to incubation and
brooding ; although artificial methods are necessary in some lines,
and perhaps better for some persons or in some cases, as a rule it
is very much easier to grow poultry by natural methods in the
natural season. It applies to hygiene; under natural conditions
little attention need be given to sanitary condition of houses, coops,
or soil, while under intensive, unnatural conditions these things
require constant attention. Its application might be shown in fur-
ther illustrations, but these cover the points to be considered in
this section. In no way can the poultry keeper so effectively sim-
plify his problems and make his work easier from the start as by
keeping as close as practicable to natural conditions.
Problems in practice may be essentially different from corre-
sponding theoretical problems. The theoretical treatment of a
subject (as of housing or feeding) is general, its object being to
furnish information which will enable each one who uses it to
determine what style of house or what method of feeding is best
suited to his needs. The problems of housing, feeding, etc., as
already stated, are complex problems. At the point of application
the nature of the problems changes. Theoretically they become
simple, practically they become complex.
THE POULTRY KEEPER’S PROBLEMS 67
For example, take the matter of selecting a breed or variety
and securing stock of that kind. Intelligent selection must be based
ona general knowledge of breeds and varieties. After the choice is
made, the selection of stock would be a very simple matter if all
stock of the kind desired were of the same quality. But since this
is not the case, the selection of stock often becomes a most per-
plexing matter, because, while the general average of characteristics
of a breed or variety as it may be described in a textbook is fairly
constant, the quality of the stocks of individual breeders is variable,
both in different stocks and in the same stock. A good decision as
to the kind of stock required, the type of house, or the method
of feeding may be made by a novice after a little study of any of
these matters. The building of the house then becomes a question
of his skill in carpentry (if he builds it himself). Learning to use the
ration selected becomes a question of feeding it for a little while
according to general directions, then gradually modifying to suit his
stock and conditions. But to secure such stock as he wants, it may
be necessary for him to buy and discard in succession the stock of
several different breeders.
To get suitable foundation stock is the beginner’s most difficult
problem. This is as true for the beginner who only wants good
utility stock as for one who wants exhibition stock. It should, how-
ever, afford some consolation to the beginner disappointed in re-
sults of purchases of stock to know that the problem of maintaining
high standards of quality or performance, either within his own
breeding lines or by judicious introduction of new blood, is the
greatest and most difficult problem of the expert breeder. The
novice will usually get his experience and his final start with suit-
able stock more cheaply if, following the policy of the old breeder,
he buys stock! only on inspection or approval, selecting or ac-
cepting only stock that is evidently thrifty and in good condition,
1 Whether to buy stock or eggs is usually considered a moot question. Per-
sonally, from experience and observation, I believe it is better for the beginner to
buy stock for breeding, if for no other reason than because by so doing he gains a
year’s experience in breeding. He may buy eggs also, if he can handle more young
stock than his breeders will produce, or if he wishes to get a line on the quality of
the stock breeders. Experienced poultrymen (soft-roaster growers excepted) do
not depend on purchased eggs for hatching, and even among soft-roaster growers
the practice of buying eggs is decreasing.
68 POULTRY CULTURE
well grown and well developed for its age and kind, free from
serious faults, and of fair quality according to American Poultry
Association standards. The descriptions of breeds and varieties
in Part III will enable him to estimate the quality of stock with
sufficient accuracy for his purpose. He should on no account ac-
cept a bird that shows any indication of ill health. If buying
young birds, he should take only those that are full grown, espe-
cially avoiding birds said to be late hatched. Such birds are most
likely to be undersized specimens from early hatches. In any case
the novice should avoid the late-hatched birds ; some of them make
valuable breeders in their second breeding season, but they are of
little service during the first season. Asa rule he will find it better
to buy near home, as he would buy a horse or a cow. The com-
paratively low cost of transportation for poultry tempts many to
buy at a distance, of breeders who advertise extensively, but one
is much surer of getting good stock of the kind under considera-
tion if he buys the best that he can find in his vicinity. Without
being extravagant the novice should be willing to pay a fair price!
for suitable stock, not only because it is designed to be foundation
stock, but also for the following important reasons :
1. He cannot do good work without good stock. An expert
may. Every problem of the poultry keeper is made more difficult
when the stock is weak or in any way unsuitable for the purpose
for which it is used.
2. Rugged, vigorous stock will stand mishandling when weak
stock will not. With the best of intentions a novice is likely to
make some mistakes tending to the detriment of his stock. From
humane as well as from economic considerations the beginner
should select stock of great vitality.
1 The price will depend much on the reputation of the breeder. A breeder
with no general reputation will often sell at a dollar each birds that could not be
bought from a breeder of wide reputation for less than five dollars. Those figures
fairly represent the range of relative prices. One who finds birds to suit him at
the lower price is fortunate, but if the low-priced birds do not suit, he had better
pay the higher figures and, if his means are limited, take a smaller number of birds.
CHAPTER V
POULTRY TYPES AND THEIR RELATIONS TO OBJECTS, CONDITIONS,
AND METHODS OF POULTRY KEEPING
Reference has been made to the influence of certain types of
poultry on the development of the industry. It is necessary, before
questions of location, equipment, and methods are taken up, to
consider some properties of type which bear on these questions.
What is type? As used by poultrymen in a general sense the
term “type’’ denotes a fixed combination of qualities especially
adapted to definite results (as meat type, egg type, general-
purpose type, game type), these being the distinct types of fowls
to which nearly all breeds and varieties may be referred.
Type and breed. In a state of nature birds of the same kind
living under the same conditions are, as a rule, of a common type.
They are of approximately the same size and color, and so nearly
alike that individuals are not easily distinguished. The type of the
wild bird is fixed by natural selection. The individual which in any
character differs greatly from the ordinary type is less likely to
live and produce offspring; and when it does, the chance of its
meeting with a mate like itself is remote. Variation always tends
to be modified or lost in the common type.
When birds are brought into domestication, variations occur more
frequently, and the conditions of the bird’s life in domestication
prevent the general destruction of individuals which depart from
the usual type. As a result of the preservation of variations, and
of miscellaneous unions of individuals diverging from the general
type in many characters, a species in domestication soon reaches
a condition of mongrelism, the original combination of characters
becoming very rare, or perhaps entirely disappearing, and no fixed
combination replacing it.
Among the numerous types occurring in a mongrelized species
some are more serviceable than others and some more pleasing to
the eye of the owner. For one or both of these reasons a particular
69
70 POULTRY CULTURE
type may become a preferred type. Such a type may closely re-
semble, either in general or in some conspicuous characters, the
wild type, or it may be very different. Whatever the type, by con-
tinuous breeding of males and females nearest that type, it may
in a few generations become so well established as to reproduce
itself quite as uniformly as the original wild stock. Such a type,
as distinguished from mongrel stock of its kind, is called a dreed.
The number of breeds which may be developed within a species
is theoretically unlimited. Practically it is limited by the difficulty
that most people experience in properly differentiating between
types not strikingly dissimilar.
Breed type. A breed type may be described as a well-established
artificial combination of characters peculiar to part of a domesti-
cated species, plainly differentiating it from the rest of the species.
True breed characters are very few in number. The basis of breed
type is form. Poultrymen say, ‘‘ Shape makes the breed.’’ Charac-
ters determining breed type are size, shape of body, proportions, and
adjustments to the body of head, neck, wings, legs, and tail. The
length and texture of the plumage and the color of the skin are
also features of breed type.
Breed divisions. Birds of the same breed type may differ in
superficial characters, such as color of plumage, shape of comb,
presence or absence of superfluous feathering on head or feet. By
such differentiation within a breed vartefzes are established. Varie-
ties, again, may be divided, according to some minor character,
into subvarieties.
Breed relations. Breed (and variety) types distinct in appearance
may still be so similar in everything affecting usefulness that they
are equally well adapted to the general conditions of a region or to
prevailing market requirements, and are, on the whole, equally serv-
iceable. Such similar breeds constitute a c/ass. In the selection
of poultry for a particular location or purpose class type is the
major consideration; breed and variety characters are of minor
importance.
Economic classification of fowls. Among the numerous breeds,
varieties, and subvarieties of fowls are found three principal class
types, commonly known as the meat type, the egg type, and the
general-purpose type. It is not necessary here to assign to each
METHODS OF POULTRY KEEPING 71
and every known breed a place in one or another of these classes.
Only the more familiar breeds need be mentioned.
The meat type. The best examples of this type are the Brahmas,
Cochins, and Langshans, comprising the Asiatic class of the
fanciers.
The egg type is most commonly represented by the Leghorns,
though Minorcas, Andalusians, and Anconas are well-known mem-
bers of the class. These breeds, with the Spanish, constitute the
Mediterranean class of the fancier. The so-called Dutch and Polish
classes are of substantially the same type.
The general-purpose type is an intermediate between the meat
and egg types. The Plymouth Rocks, Wyandottes, and Rhode
Island Reds, known to fanciers as the American class, are the
principal breeds of this class in this country. The English Orping-
ton is of the same general type and economically belongs to the
same class as the three American breeds mentioned.
Class properties. The designations of the different classes indi-
cate in a general way their class characters, but taken too literally
these terms may be misleading. Such terms as ‘‘meat type” and
“egg type’ do not mean that the bird is adapted to one purpose to the
exclusion of the other. They merely describe dominant tendency.
The Brahma, the most popular representative of the meat type,
grows to a large size, furnishing abundance of meat, and remains
soft-meated until well matured, furnishing the somewhat rare combi-
nation of tender flesh in a large carcass. The tendency at maturity
is to put on fat rather than to produce eggs, though in skillful hands
Brahmas are good egg producers. The Leghorn, the most popular
representative of the egg type, is a small, active fowl, maturing
quickly, the males especially becoming hard-meated at a very early
age, making the breed of little value for table purposes. But the
active temperament of the Leghorn tends to keep it, for a longer
period than is usual, in the physical condition favorable to reproduc-
tion under unfavorable conditions, and consequently, though the
possibilities of egg production may be as great with the Brahma
as with the Leghorn, good laying is more general among fowls of
the Leghorn type than among those of the Brahma type.
In each of these types a superficial character limits the adapt-
ability and use of the class. The profuse feathering of Asiatic
2 POULTRY CULTURE
fowls, and especially the feathering on the feet, makes them un-
suitable for many situations. The Mediterranean fowls, with their
large combs, are ill suited to cold latitudes. The general-purpose
type of fowl, which is vastly more popular than all others com-
bined, was developed objectively as a dual-purpose type with ten-
dencies toward meat and egg production well balanced, but also
subjectively as a type free from eccentric features, and so adapted
to the widest range of circumstances.
In the kinds of poultry other than fowls, class distinctions are
less sharply drawn. Breeds and varieties are not so numerous, and
breed and class types may more nearly coincide ; yet, as breeds and
varieties multiply, the tendency to the creation of classes similar to
the recognized general classes of fowls becomes apparent.
All breeds and varieties in a class are substantially alike. They
require the same conditions and treatment and serve the same
practical purposes. Hence in all questions relating to these points
only class differences need be considered. If one variety of a class
is adapted to certain purposes, or thrives under certain conditions
and treatment, any other variety of the class may serve well the
same purpose and will thrive under like conditions and treatment.
If individuals do not, the fault is in the individuals or the keeper.
Necessary differences in conditions and methods are slight. The
general-purpose type of fowl is adapted to the widest range of con-
ditions and requires least attention, but the differences between
conditions and methods for this type and the Asiatic meat type, on
the one hand, and the egg type, on the other, seem, when stated,
quite trivial. The Asiatics do best on sandy soils and in cool
climates, and require, to make good development, more food than
a good range affords and, to keep in laying condition, closer and
more judicious attention than the ordinary poultry keeper gives.
Fowls of the egg-type class, particularly the males with large combs
and crests, need special protection from cold and dampness; but
this class requires less attention to feeding than any other. In a
comparison of classes the class characteristics are in a sense equal-
ized, but this does not enter into the question as considered in any
particular undertaking. What each poultry keeper has to consider
is that, if he selects a breed requiring special attention, his buildings,
yards, fences, appliances, and methods must be adapted to that
METHODS OF POULTRY KEEPING 73
breed. He should consider carefully in advance whether this is
worth while, or whether it would be better to choose one not
requiring unusual care. In some cases it pays to give the extra
care; in others it does not. In a combination of fancy and utility
poultry keeping with the same pure breed, it is also necessary
to consider whether the conditions and methods established with
reference to one object will also serve for the other. They may
or they may not ; and if they do not, it is usually better to develop
only the line that they suit. As a rule, economies of space or labor
which are profitable in market poultry growing have a detrimental
effect on type, while the special care and attention which may
profitably be given to high-class birds produced for exhibition or
stock purposes do not pay when applied to the production of
poultry and eggs for the table.
CHAPTER VI
PROBLEMS OF LOCATION
Phases of the question of location. In discussing the general
question of location we consider the two following subjects :
1. Matters which directly affect production, — local climatic fea-
tures, exposures, drainage, soils. Such things are of varying values
in the problem of location as presented to different individuals in
the same community.
2. Matters which, while not so intimately affecting production,
influence and ultimately determine its volume, — general climatic
conditions, markets, transportation facilities, and adaptation of poul-
try keeping to other interests. Such things are, on the whole, fac-
tors of like value in the same community. These aspects of the
question cannot be wholly separated, even for purpose of discussion,
but the reader should note that, broadly speaking, matters of the
first class are mostly within control of the poultryman, while mat-
ters of the second class are mostly beyond his control.
Most of those interested in poultry have to adapt poultry keeping
to a location and to conditions determined without reference to it.
Only a small proportion of those engaging in this line try to locate
themselves with a view to securing every advantage that location can
give. From either point of view the facts and principles to be con-
sidered are the same. The difference is in the application. One
who is already located must adapt poultry keeping to his location.
One who can choose his location may decide first what lines of
poultry keeping to follow, and locate accordingly. In practice,
very few persons choose their location with reference to poultry
keeping, even if able to do so. They usually locate in the section
or place that they prefer to live in, and adapt their poultry keeping
to circumstances.
Climate. General climatic conditions are of less importance in
poultry culture than is commonly supposed. Wherever man can
74
PROBLEMS OF LOCATION 75
live and sustain himself, poultry can be kept and, if the scale of
operations is properly adjusted, can be kept profitably. It is
sometimes supposed, and occasionally stated as the result of an
individual experience, that poultry cannot be kept in certain locali-
ties or under certain conditions, — as high altitudes, proximity to
salt water, etc. In most cases these views are erroneous. Usually
they are based upon instances where failure was due to causes not
peculiar to the locality. Adaptability to a wide range of climatic
and other conditions is, as has been stated, one of the most valu-
able characteristics of poultry, but individual birds are not always
affected alike by radical changes of environment, nor is the same
individual always equally able to adapt itself to all changes. The
process of acclimatization requires time. An individual, or a stock
generally, may be so unfavorably affected by a change that it is ad-
visable to discard it and try other stock, but, as a rule, by judicious
care and breeding a stock may be established anywhere within a
few. years.
Nor are there such differences in results from poultry under
different climatic conditions as might be supposed, because, on the
whole, the advantages and disadvantages due to such conditions are
equalized in a year’s work. Thus the long, rigorous winters of north
temperate regions are offset by the long, hot summers of the South,
and the undesirable features of each, though opposite in nature,
may have the same effects on financial results.1
1 Theoretically, there should be an intermediate belt in which conditions
approached the ideal. If all other conditions could be made uniform for purposes
of observation, it might be possible to make a survey that would locate such a belt ;
but no such uniformity can be obtained. The adaptability of poultry to climate
alone presents an insuperable obstacle to exact computations of the effects of cli-
mate. The birds could not be kept standardized to one climate while living in an-
other. The general tendency is for birds of the same breeding to give like results
within a wide range of climatic conditions, if the food and care are appropriate. In
milder climates cheaper buildings may be used, and the labor of caring for the
poultry in winter is reduced; but in general, production is better where outdoor
occupations are restricted in winter and the poultry keeper is compelled to give
his birds careful attention to get any profit, than where many outdoor occupations
can be carried on all winter and the birds may be given less care without hardship to
them. Though the season of winter egg production begins earlier in the South,
production during the period of high prices does not seem to be enough greater
than in the North to give southern poultry keepers generally larger receipts for
the winter than are obtained in other sections.
76 POULTRY CULTURE
Special features. Local climatic conditions affecting poultry
depend, as a rule, upon the character or formation of the land,
features of the landscape, prevailing winds, etc. Their relations to
poultry keeping are presented in connection with the topics of soil,
sunlight, and ventilation. It has been stated that these conditions
are under the control of the poultryman. This is not true in the
sense that he can alter them, though sometimes he may ; but when
he cannot change he can usually avoid them, for in most cases an
unfavorable local condition affects only a small area, and is escaped
when buildings for poultry are placed on suitable sites.
Soils and drainage. That a light, well-drained soil, of little value
for the production of vegetable crops, is best suited for poultry was
long a maxim among poultry keepers. Of late years that view has
been greatly modified. Such a soil has advantages. That it is the
best soil for exclusive poultry keeping by intensive methods can-
not be denied. Such land can be easily and continuously stocked
with poultry longer than any other; but there is a limit to. the
capacity of any soil to convey excrement and disease germs so far
below ‘the surface that they will be harmless, and with the passing
of intensive methods, and the increasing tendency to either stock
land lightly or rotate poultry on it, the objections to heavy soils
become of less importance. The special advantages of light soils
will always be admitted, but such land is no longer regarded as
the prime requisite, while the fact that under some conditions it
has decided disadvantages is more generally recognized.
Clay soils. Clay soils are least suited to poultry, but if surface
drainage is good, overstocking avoided, and the land frequently
broken up for tillage, the character of the soil does not present
a serious obstacle to poultry keeping.
It is desirable that land on which permanent buildings are
placed should be of such character or conformation that water
will not stand near them and that the poultry will always have the
use of an area of approximately dry land. With this insurance
against protracted exposure on cold, damp land, it will be found
that poultry on a range which affords varied soil conditions are
more thrifty and make better development than those restricted
to light, well-drained soils. This is especially noticeable in hot,
dry seasons,
PROBLEMS OF LOCATION 77
Sunlight. So important is this element in poultry keeping that
it is usual in all northerly latitudes to face the buildings in a south-
erly direction and, wherever possible, to place them on a slope with
southerly exposure. Such disposition of buildings is a distinct ad-
vantage during the winter months, when conditions are most try-
ing, but is not so essential that all other considerations should be
subordinate. Lack of such land is no bar to operations with poultry.
Even a northerly slope, rising from a building facing south, is less
objectionable in practice than it seems in theory. If such a slope
is not too abrupt, and is free from elevations, growths, or structures
which would prevent the sunshine from reaching the buildings, as
good results may be obtained on it as anywhere. In fact, while
snow is on the ground and the birds confined to the house, the lay
of the land makes little difference. A southerly slope is available
earlier in the spring and later in the fall, and, when bare in the
winter, is comfortable and attractive when the opposite slope is the
reverse and birds avoid it. Asa rule, situations having the best sun
exposure in winter are too much exposed to the sun in summer,
and unless the heat at that season is tempered for the fowls by
shade, or by yards to the north of the house, the net advantage
of a sunny situation may be slight.
Ventilation. Circulation of air is also an important matter and
must be considered with reference to all seasons and to extreme
conditions. A situation which in winter is well sheltered and nota-
bly comfortable may become intolerable in summer, when the heat
of the sun is intense and the movement of air obstructed by foliage
both day and night. To this condition in small open spaces in the
woods is due the generally unsatisfactory results of efforts to keep
poultry in parts of wooded tracts not adjacent to open areas of con-
siderable extent. In such places, and in depressions between ridges,
atmospheric conditions are very often unsuited to poultry. As be-
tween such conditions and exposure to strong winds, the latter is
less objectionable, for where circulation of air is naturally obstructed,
no remedy may be possible ; but it is always possible to provide,
in wind-swept situations, houses of wind-proof construction and
such additional windbreaks or shelters as the fowls may require.
Markets. Every city and town furnishes a market for poultry
products. A town or small city in an agricultural district is likely
78 POULTRY CULTURE
to be fully supplied from farms in its vicinity, at prices which offer
no inducement for the extension of poultry growing in that vicinity
beyond what the ordinary small farm flocks supply. But if poultry
producers in such a district have easy access to the markets of a
large city, the local price rises to the city price minus cost of trans-
portation and distribution. In times of scarcity it may more nearly
approach prices in the larger market, because of the tendency of
shippers to that market to keep their goods moving in the usual
channels and not to interrupt regular trade connections for tempo-
rary advantage. The large city furnishes an almost constant outlet
for all supplies that reach it, for every large city is a distributing
as well as a receiving center. The large cities of the Central West
store their surplus receipts or ship them to the large eastern cities,
and these in their turn store them or distribute to cities of lesser
size in the eastern states, where a large proportion of the population
is engaged in other than agricultural pursuits. The volume of prod-
uce shipped from the region between the Mississippi River and
the Rocky Mountains, considerable though it is, comprises but a
minor part of the total product of that region. Taking the country
as a whole, the poultry-trade organization is so efficient that the
question of a market rarely calls for special consideration, further
than that, wherever he may be located, the poultry keeper should
fully inform himself as to available market advantages.
Transportation. The hauling of supplies and produce between
the plant and the railway shipping point is the phase of transpor-
tation to which those keeping large stocks of poultry should give
special attention. The difference between the cost of a short haul
and that of a long haul often makes the difference between a living
profit and a profit so small that the enterprise must be abandoned.
A plant selling fancy poultry and eggs, or selling table poultry and
eggs direct to consumers, or one that buys large quantities of sup-
plies, cannot afford to make long hauls locally. One producing
most of its supplies, and making deliveries of produce only once
or twice a week, may not be seriously handicapped by a haul of
five or six miles. When hauls are not too frequent, the cost may
be offset by some other advantage, as cheaper land. But if there
is much hauling to be done, it is a mistake to develop a large
poultry plant on a site not convenient to railway connections.
CHAPTER VII
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING
Definitions. Method and system are not always clearly differen-
tiated, and the terms are ‘often used as synonymous. There are,
however, many cases in which the difference is apparent. AZethod
usually applies to processes, systenz to series of processes or to
comprehensive plans, including a variety of more or less related
processes.!
General methods. In poultry keeping methods are described as
extensive (giving the birds as much room as they can use to their
own advantage or to the saving of labor for the poultryman) or
intensive (placing on a given area of land a much larger number
of birds than the land can support, even for a very brief period,
with proportionate increase of labor and expense for their main-
tenance). The common tendency in practice is to go to one or
the other extreme. The practice best adapted to any particular
place ‘and conditions is usually some combination of extensive and
intensive methods.
Essence of system. A system of poultry keeping is a compre-
hensive plan for adapting conditions and methods to the manage-
ment of large numbers of poultry. In the development of systems
of poultry keeping, conditions and appliances are of more impor-
tance than processes. The object of system is to simplify methods
and reduce labor, while maintaining conditions favorable to the
1 The way of killing a fowl is a method. The way of feeding a single lot of
poultry for any particular purpose is a method. Several related methods of
feeding poultry for different purposes may constitute a system of feeding. The
housing of a single lot of poultry supplies a condition. The house is an appliance,
a part of the permanent equipment of the poultry keeper. “ Method of housing”
would mean merely the act of putting the poultry into the house. The handling
of a single flock of poultry, though systematic, cannot as a rule be said to consti-
tute a system. In occasional cases a poultry keeper may carefully work out a
routine of operations with a single flock which might be called a system, but in
general the managing of single flocks is merely a combination of methods having
no special logical relation to each other.
79
80 POULTRY CULTURE
stock. A system which does not secure these results in any case
is not adapted to that case. To be generally serviceable, a system
must be adapted to continuous poultry keeping under ordinary
conditions. There are two typical systems of poultry keeping, —
extensive and intensive,— developed respectively from extensive
and intensive methods of handling single flocks.1
Ordinary farm poultry keeping is theoretically by the extensive
method. On most farms each kind of poultry is handled as one
flock, though when the flock is large, several houses may be required
by birds ranging over the same area. But when more birds are kept
in one flock than can procure, in the area over which they range,
the foods that they should procure by foraging, the method actually
Fic. 79. Beginnings of an extensive system on the farm of Samuel Bates,
West Norwell, Massachusetts
becomes intensive. It is not possible to indefinitely increase the
size of a flock and at the same time to maintain conditions favor-
able to the birds and to economy of labor.
Extensive systems. By multiplying the number of flocks kept
by extensive methods extensive systems are developed. The proper
development of such a system requires that the houses be placed
1 In this connection it is appropriate to state the facts in regard to the
numerous so-called systems of keeping poultry, or of determining facts of value
to the poultry keeper. The usual claims for a “ system” are that it is based upon a
discovery of the person exploiting it, and that by the system the results that poultry
keepers desire are assured. The system is offered for sale, and the description of
it represents it as something to be procured only from its originator. The author,
in more than twenty years’ intimate knowledge of poultry culture, has not found a
single instance where what was of value in such a “ system” was not a matter of
common knowledge among well-informed poultrymen. In all these systems “ what
is true is not new, and what is new is not true.”
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 81
at such (minimum) distance apart, and the number of birds in each
be so limited, that the area serving as a range for them will provide
a good foraging ground. The flock is divided into colonies. Hence
Fic. 80. Extensive system at the Provincial Poultry Breeding Station,
Edmonton, Alberta. Colony houses with large temporary yards. (Photo-
graph from the station)
the name “colony system,” applied especially to the following most
notable systematic development of extensive methods.
The Rhode Island colony system. The development of a colony
system of housing poultry, with appropriate methods of management,
Fic. 81. Colony houses without yards at the Wisconsin Agricultural College
(Photograph from the college)
seems so logical and natural that it might reasonably be supposed
that, as farmers all over the country increased their stocks of poultry,
this system would be generally adopted. On the contrary, in all but
82 POULTRY CULTURE
one locality, the usual practice was to increase production only as
long as the stock kept could be handled in one flock.
Some one in the vicinity of Little Compton, Rhode Island,
at an early stage of the awakening of interest in poultry keeping,
--— Saw the advantage of
retaining the style of
small house in use and
of distributing small
flocks over the land,
and adopted that sys-
tem. Others followed
his example. The
system was soon in
general use in a lim-
ited area in that part of
Rhode Island and the
adjoining part of Massachusetts, poultry keeping became the most
important interest of the district, and the district became one of the
largest poultry-producing communities in the world. While occasion-
ally individuals failed or, because of disease in the flocks, were obliged
to discontinue operations for a period, on the whole poultry ventures
flourished and grew to large proportions, were as permanent as other
branches of agriculture, and were often carried on generation after
Fic. 82. Large colonies on the farm of A. M. Shaw,
Groton, N.Y. (Photograph by H. J. Blanchard)
Fic. 83. Colony system on a Pennsylvania farm
generation by the same families on the same farms. The Rhode
Island Red, a breed especially adapted to local conditions and
methods, was developed and long remained peculiar to that locality.
The development of the colony system in this section began
about the middle of the last century, but attracted little attention
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 83
outside the district un-
til recent years.! This
neglect of so impor-
tant a development
was due to the gen-
eral faith in intensive
methods and to the
prevailing idea that
poultry culture on an
extensive scale could
only be carried on suc-
cessfully when artifi-
cial methods of incubating and brooding were used, and the sup-
posed correct principles of housing, feeding, etc. (which made the
-_
|
|
Fic. 84. Intensive back-yard plant. (Photograph
from E. A. Day, Farmington, Minnesota)
Fic. 85. Intensive system on farm in central Massachusetts. Shelters with small
attached runs. Note similarity between the unit in this system and the house
: and run in Fig. 84
ventilation of a house an engineering feat and the feeding of a few
fowls a chemical problem) were carefully observed. Not until the
1] first visited this section and published an account of the system in gol.
No extended account of it had previously been published, and the occasional items
regarding it appearing in one of the poultry papers were hardly noticed. Even to
this day the greater part of the poultry press is not interested in these poultry
keepers, who, with few exceptions, neither buy nor sell anything through advertis-
ing. I would not state positively from memory, and verification would be difficult,
but to the best of my recollection it was not until five or six years later than the pub-
lication of my account that investigators of poultry matters began to visit this sec-
tion, and these were mostly engaged in educational work.
84 POULTRY CULTURE
limitations of intensive systems began to be widely recognized was
any general interest shown in the Rhode Island colony system.
Nowhere else are extensive methods applied so consistently and on
so large a scale as in
the Little Compton
district. Interest in the
system elsewhere takes
the direction mainly of
seeking to apply fea-
tures of the system as
practiced here in modi-
fication of the intensive
= system. Points relat-
Fic. 86. View on an intensive plant (no system) ing to this will be con-
sidered in their place.
Ordinary town poultry keeping is by the intensive method.!
Few town people who keep fowls are willing to give up to them as
much land as the flock needs for range, even if they have the land.
The townsman especially interested in poultry almost invariably
wants to keep all the poultry that his land will carry by any known
— WAT ea ee
Baie vi |
/
cachet 1 Ceastipatt rem : et Bite
Fic. 87. An intensive plant (good system). (Photograph from E. T. Brown,
London, England)
method. The average flock contains from twelve to fifteen or
eighteen hens, is housed in a building having a floor surface of
1 This book does not treat at all the ultraintensive methods of the mushroom
" systems,” widely exploited for a few years but now dying out. The actual de-
velopments of such systems are insignificant.
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 85
from 80 to 120 square feet, and is given a yard of only two or
three times the area of the house floor. Under such conditions
poultry can be kept healthy and made productive only by the most
careful management, including regular provision for exercise and
the variety of vegetable and animal foods that they get when
foraging on a good range. If carefully managed, small flocks so
kept will usually show a better profit per hen and better returns
for the area of ground that they occupy than flocks kept on range.
Larger flocks under the same conditions do not, as a rule, give
returns proportionate to those from the small flocks. Hence it was
natural for the town poultry keeper, instead of adding to the original
Fic. 88. Typical breeding-stock house (intensive plan). The yards here are
only 50 feet long, though available land is practically unlimited
flock when increasing his stock, to multiply his flocks, just as the
Rhode Island farmer did, and thus to develop the intensive system.
Intensive systems. When the small flock in close quarters is
made the unit, and the conditions duplicated indefinitely, an inten-
sive system is developed. By such a system the apparent poultry
capacity of any given area is very large. Four or five hundred hens
to the acre the advocate of intensive methods did not consider
crowding, and some systems were calculated for double those
numbers. The difference between a system providing for four or
five hundred hens to the acre and one providing for eight hundred
or a thousand was principally in the allowance of yard room. The
smaller numbers might be given yards large enough for a part of
the yard to keep in grass under favorable conditions; the larger
86 POULTRY CULTURE
numbers were given small, bare yards. Houses were of the same
style and the sections generally of the same dimensions, though to
provide for large numbers the space requirements per bird might
be figured on a smaller allowance and the estimated capacity of
each section thus increased.
Seeing no occasion for separating houses, and a distinct advan-
tage in joining them, intensive poultry keepers developed first
houses several times as long as those used for a single flock, and
finally houses ten, twenty, and even fifty times as long, making
Fic. 89. View of part of poultry plant at Pennsylvania State College, where
both systems are in use
the common lengths from 100 to over 200 feet, and in extreme
cases 500 and (approximately) 600 feet.
The intensive system has been in general use for about fifty
or sixty years, but has never been long successful when the
plant was larger than the owner could care for personally, and
not often permanent when on such a scale that all of one man’s
time was required.1 It is still widely used, though attempts to es-
tablish large plants of that type are less numerous than formerly.
It is likely to be used for a long time, perhaps always, in many
instances where it should be at least considerably modified, simply
because of the common human tendency to undertake more than
resources warrant.
1 The writer has not known more than two or three poultrymen who have
made a living on an intensive plant who would advise others to use the system
on a large scale, or would continue to use it themselves if they could afford the
cost and loss of making a change.
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 87
Comparison of extensive and intensive systems. The object of
comparison of typical extensive and intensive methods and systems
is to determine the values and applications of each. As indicated
|
|
Fic. 90. Colony houses placed end to the road, with yards running from road
(Photograph from E. T. Brown, London, England)
in the statement of the present attitude of poultrymen toward the
colony system, the best working system will in most cases combine
extensive and intensive methods. These methods, while different
Fic. 91. A Massachusetts farmer’s adaptation of idea shown in Fig. go
Houses (with yards) on both sides of the road
in many points, are not mutually exclusive, but present the ex-
tremes, between which there may be as many grades of the two
in combination as there are persons using them.
The advantages of the extensive or colony system are:
1, Conditions most favorable to poultry at all stages of growth.
88 POULTRY CULTURE
2. Low cost of equipment; the house cost per bird may be
lower for the same number of birds in houses of equal size. With
good range the birds use the house less, when there is no snow on
the ground, and a larger number of birds may be kept in colony
houses than in the sections of the same floor area in a continuous
sectional house with small yards.
3. Economy of labor (when snow does not lie long on the
ground) and larger utilization of unskilled labor. Birds kept under
natural conditions do not require the constant dieting and nursing
Fic. 92. Pittsfield Poultry Farm, Pittsfield, Maine, where intensive and extensive
systems are combined, large yards for adult stock and young stock grown in
orchards on the colony system
too often necessary on intensive plants, and many things to which
the intensive poultry keeper must give his constant personal
attention may safely be left to unskilled help. There is also less
need of scrupulous cleanliness.
4. Economy of food; the birds pick a large part of their living.
5. Improvement of land, and sometimes double cropping of
land, especially with young poultry.
6. Stability of value of equipment ; when small, movable houses
are used, they are salable at their full value at any time.
The disadvantages of the extensive or colony system are:
1, Added labor in bad weather, particularly when snow keeps
the birds in the houses.
2. Unfavorable conditions for the birds when long confined to
houses designed only for roosting and laying quarters.
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 89
3. Difficulty of controlling disease when the flocks mingle.
In a summary of advantages and disadvantages it appears that
the colony system is a system best adapted to mild climates, where
winters are short; and that for its extensive development a farm
of considerable acreage is required.
The advantages of an intensive system are:
1. More favorable conditions for the fowls in winter weather or
extremely rough weather at any season.
2. Comfort and convenience of poultry keeper in bad weather.
Fic. 93. The long houses are 200 feet long by 20 feet wide. The house at the ex-
treme right has small compartments for special matings. (Continuing Fig. 92)
(Photograph from Pittsfield Poultry Farm)
3. Admits of keeping a large stock of adult birds (and young
ducks) on small areas. :
The disadvantages of an intensive system are:
1. Unfavorable conditions for adult stock in warm weather and
unsuitable conditions for the breeding birds and young stock.
2. Added cost of labor at all seasons when the birds should
be on range.
3. Added cost of food at all seasons when the birds should be
on range.
4. Increased cost of equipment, buildings costing, on the whole,
considerably more than for colonized flocks, and the cost of fences
being a comparatively large item.
5. Contamination of land and expense of keeping small perma-
nent yards in good sanitary condition.
fete) POULTRY CULTURE
6. Instability of value of buildings; when an intensive plant
is discontinued, the buildings on it can rarely be sold for more
than a very small fraction of what they originally cost.1
Fic. 94. The colony system in use at the Shellbanks Farm of the Hampton
Institute, Hampton, Virginia
In a summary of advantages and disadvantages it appears that
the intensive system is adapted to winter conditions and areas too
restricted to admit of giving range to poultry, and that it is defective
y ype” a Rigs
Fic. 95. Another view of colony poultry farming at Shellbanks. (Photographs
from Hampton Institute)
in that it is not suited to young and breeding stock. Continuous poul-
try culture by intensive methods is practically impossible. The land
1 Usually they have been allowed to fall into decay. Near Boston some years
ago three long houses, costing $3000 and used only a short time, sold at auction
(to be removed) for less than $100.
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 91
becomes polluted by the excrement of the fowls and sometimes in-
fected with disease germs, the stock deteriorates, and the poultryman
cannot stand the stress and strain of working against natural laws.
Combining advantages of the two systems. While general
practice on farms, as well as on town lots and on poultry plants,
has tended too much toward intensive conditions, the marked and
almost immediately apparent disadvantage of such conditions for
breeding stock and growing stock forced a measure of departure
from them, especially in the care of the growing stock to be used
for laying and breeding purposes. It was usual, even when the
intensive plant was at the height of its popularity, to give breeding
oe
se
Fic. 96. Colony houses at one side of grain field at Iowa Agricultural College
(Photograph from the college)
stock more room than the laying stock, either by colonizing or by
reducing the number in the compartments allotted to them (thus
giving more room in both house and yard), and to give range to
the young stock,— although, too often, the range was so overstocked
that the actual advantage of doing so was very slight. Sometimes,
the birds being nominally on range, too much was assumed as
to the advantages which they secured in being at liberty, and the
variety of foods which, under suitable conditions, the range would
have furnished was not provided. In the majority of cases the most
serious obstacle to the adoption of extensive methods was the lack
of land and the difficulty of securing adjoining or convenient land
for the rearing of young stock.
Leaving out of consideration the cost of equipment and labor, if
92 POULTRY CULTURE
breeding stock is given grass yards of such size that the birds do not
keep the grass down, and the young stock to be retained can be grown
each year on fresh ground, without overcrowding their range, young
birds which are to be marketed may be grown, and laying stock kept,
under intensive conditions, without marked falling off in results, fora
term of years the duration of which will be determined by the charac-
ter of the soil and the attention given to maintaining sanitary con-
ditions. Whether, when cost of equipment and labor are considered,
it pays to adopt intensive methods for laying stock and market poul-
try is determined in each case by the circumstances in that case.
Fic. 97. Summer arrangement of colony houses at Macdonald College
(Photograph from the college)
In the growing of soft roasters, one of the most profitable
branches of poultry culture, the methods used are in some respects
so intensive that when first published they were received by poul-
trymen generally with incredulity. But the soft-roaster growers
in the South Shore district (with a very few exceptions) do not
practice continuous poultry culture. As originally developed, the
business ! was exclusively the growing, under intensive conditions,
1 This business, as developed in this district, is a fine example of an efficient
extemporaneous and informal organization of producers. The farmers keep the
breeding stock, selling eggs for hatching to the growers from about midsummer
until about midwinter. The price paid was for many years fifty cents a dozen,
but of late years sixty cents has been the standard price. A large grower usually
requires the eggs of a number of farm flocks, and contracts for them in advance.
As the eggs from the farms having the best reputation for furnishing fertile
SYSTEMS OF POULTRY KEEPING 93
of market poultry hatched from eggs purchased of farmers who
kept their stock under extensive conditions. That is still the com-
mon practice, though a few growers keep their own breeding stock.
Besides, the business is the growing of ‘ winter chickens,” and the
stock is off the land during the summer and early fall, thus admitting
of regular growing of crops that remove the fertilizer from the soil.
At Macdonald College, Quebec, the poultry department has
adopted, with very satisfactory results, a plan of using colony
houses in the summer and drawing them together in the winter
(see illustrations). The houses are in fenced fields without division
Fic. 98. Winter arrangement of colony houses at Macdonald College
(Photograph from the college)
fences, all houses in a field being occupied by fowls of the same
variety. This gives the hens good range when they can be out on
the ground, and brings the houses together for the season when, in
that country, it would be impossible to manage poultry in widely
separated colonies. This plan is more likely to be carried out as
eggs are most in demand, the newcomer among the growers usually experiences
some difficulty in getting good eggs. Many of the growers, after getting out
what chickens they need for their own business, use their incubators to hatch
eggs for the farmers. Thus during the greater part of the year the eggs from the
farm flocks are used for hatching purposes. The income of the growers all comes
in during a few months in the spring and early summer. A grower whose credit is
good is “carried” by his grain dealer, who perhaps is carried, in turn, by his
bank, through the season when expenses are heavy and income nothing. The
entire product of the district is marketed by a few men who buy chickens, as
they become ready, from the grower, paying cash for the live birds, dressing
them, and shipping to the Boston market.
94 POULTRY CULTURE
projected in a region where winters are long and severe than where
the shorter winters, sometimes with little snow, tempt the poultry
keeper to leave the houses in the fields and thus save the labor
of twice moving them.
Temporary range. A common practice of breeders who keep
their breeding stock under intensive conditions is to put all hens
in one large flock at the close of the breeding season, and from that
time until winter give them range under conditions as nearly natural
as possible. Often the land used for this purpose is rough, over-
grown with weeds and brush, swampy, etc.,— of such character
that it is not desirable to use it for permanent yards or for any
purpose that necessitates much traveling over it. It is a matter of
common observation that hens thus turned out to pasture not only
store up vitality for the following breeding season but frequently
lay well all through the summer and fall.
Weakest point in intensive systems. The common obstacle to
the development of branches of poultry culture under intensive
conditions supplied with stock from flocks kept under extensive
conditions is the uncertainty of the source of supply. Many poultry
keepers engaged in producing market eggs have tried to have their
stock grown on farms, but usually with most unsatisfactory results.
CHAPTER VIII
YARDS AND FENCES
The subjects of this chapter, usually treated as supplementary to
discussions of housing, are properly preliminary. The relations of
poultry and the land that it occupies is a primary question in perma-
nent poultry culture; the question of supplied shelter is secondary.
Many kinds of poultry require no shelter other than that which
nature provides in conditions favorable to their existence. All
kinds of poultry thrive as well or better in the open during the
greater part of the natural breeding and growing seasons. To a
much greater extent than is generally appreciated, the advantage
of human protection to these birds is in protection from natural
enemies rather than in protection from the elements.
The methods and systems of poultry keeping applicable in any
case depend (as shown in the preceding chapter) very much upon the
amount of land available and the extent to which climatic conditions
permit use of the land. While in order of construction fences follow
houses, the first point to consider in planning is the amount of land
available, or to be occupied, and how it may be used to best advantage.
The type of house or other shelter to be used, as well as methods of
management, will depend upon how the land is to be apportioned.
A yard for poultry is a necessary evil. The degree of the evil
varies inversely with the size of the poultry yard. One man, who
appears frequently as a poultry lecturer, is accustomed to say that
the word “‘yard”’ should be banished from the vocabulary of poultry-
men and that they should accustom themselves to consider poultry
as creatures which need pasture. The idea is an excellent one to
keep in mind, though a great deal of poultry must always be kept
in small inclosures. To economize cost of fencing, most yards for
poultry are made even smaller than the limits of space require.
This is false economy, due usually to the fact that the poultry
keeper does not understand that the height of fence necessary
depends on the area of the yard, and does not know how to take
95
96 POULTRY CULTURE
advantage of the possibilities of the common wire poultry fencing.
The desire to keep a number of varieties of the same kind of
poultry also necessitates yards with fences so high and substantial
that the different kinds cannot mingle, when if a single variety
were kept on a farm, or in a community, it would not be so neces-
sary to insure complete separation of flocks. A fence may serve
to separate different flocks, or to keep poultry from places where
they are not wanted, or to protect them. The amount and kind of
fence used should depend on the needs of each case. Though
commonly done, it is absurd to construct a fence to serve several
purposes when there is occasion only for a fence that serves one,
or where there is no need to fence at all.
Necessary height of fence. The height of fence required varies
directly according to the kind of poultry kept, and inversely accord-
ing to the area of the yard. It is not practicable to construct a fence
high enough to keep turkeys and some of the lighter breeds of
fowls in small, bare yards. The same birds at liberty might rarely
attempt to cross a fence 3 or 4 feet high. Any of the medium-
weight! and heavy-weight breeds of fowls may be confined by
a fence of wire netting 3 feet high if the inclosure is large enough
to enable them to gratify in a measure, if not fully, their natural
propensity to forage. For ducks and geese at any age, and for
small chickens, very low fences will answer. Adult ducks of the
heavier breeds will rarely go over a fence 18 inches high. Young
ducks and goslings may be kept in for some time in inclosures
surrounded by boards 8, 10, or 12 inches wide, set on edge and
kept in place with small stakes or pegs driven into the ground.
Netting 12 inches wide will answer the same purpose, but when
netting is used, 18-inch widths, which will serve until the birds
are grown, are preferred. For fences to be moved often, it is
advisable to use netting which, when new, is a little wider than
1 It is stated on good authority that Leghorns may be kept in large yards with
3-foot netting if the stakes used are from 6 to 8 feet high and pointed at the top,
offering them no inducement to fly over. The author has kept Silver Gray Dork-
ings that could easily fly over a 6-foot fence if so inclined, in yards fenced with
3-foot netting on low stakes and never had them break out. In Beverly, Massa-
chusetts, at one time, a Mr. Fassett had a large flock of Leghorns on a vacant
town lot some rods from his home, inclosed in part by an old stone wall and in
part by a low wire fence, and the fowls gave no trouble by straying beyond bounds.
YARDS AND FENCES 97
required, because, with the tendency to sag and the further gradual
reduction of the width through repeated stretching, the width of
a strip of netting, after being taken down and put up again several
times, may be from 3 to 5 or 6 inches less than it was when new.
Turkeys, peafowls, guineas, and pheasants can be kept in con-
finement only by covering the yards. The pheasant is the only one
of these birds which may be profitably grown in this way, and the
profit in pheasants in close confinement is.only obtained when they
are of a quality that will bring high prices. For protection from
foxes a fence should be not less than five feet high. Ostriches
require as high and as strong a fence as cattle.
Area of yard. The use of low fences depends on the size of the
flock, on the character of the soil and the kind and condition of the
vegetation on it, and (to some extent) on the kind of fowls. Asa
tule, the lighter and more active breeds are most destructive. Occa-
sionally individuals or flocks are found which differ from most of
their kind in this respect. A permanent yard is kept in good con-
dition with the minimum of labor and cost when in sod. On aver-
age soil, if grass is well established before fowls are allowed on it,
in a yard allowing 100 square feet per bird, sod may be maintained
in good condition over the greater part of the yard. It will be worn
rather bare near the house, and the grass may not be kept down
in the part of the yard farthest from the house. On poorer soil it
may be necessary to allow 200 square feet or more per bird to main-
tain grass. A flock of from thirty to thirty-five hens would require
from 5000 to 10,000 square feet of yard space. When temporary
yards are used, they may be smaller, provided they are changed often
enough to prevent the destruction of the grass. As long as the yard
furnishes fairly good foraging, and there is nothing particularly at-
tractive just beyond bounds, the poultry are not likely to go over the
fences. They are much more likely to go under or through them if
the wire is defective or does not follow the ground closely. When
poultry are yarded on land occupied by a growing crop or by small
fruits, they will rarely attempt to leave the yard. If the plot is over-
stocked with poultry, they are more likely to damage the crop than to
go out of bounds. The poultry that is nin in crops is usually young
stock, and the number of any kind that may be kept in any given
space varies with their age and size; no definite rule can be given.
98 POULTRY CULTURE
Alternating yards. When poultry must be kept continuously on
the same land, many poultrymen make such a division of the land
available for yards that while the birds occupy a part (usually half) of
the allotment for each flock, grass or some other crop is grown on the
rest, taking up the impurities in the soil. When the yards are of good
size, the advantage of this may be noticeable, but when the yards are
small, the disadvantage of restricting the poultry to half the space is
probably greater than the value of the green food grown on the
land that they are not occupying. In this, as in many other shifts to
overcome the disadvantages of too intensive conditions, the benefit
is not always demonstrated in a short experience. In the long run
results count against highly intensive methods, even when tempered
by such practices as this. Another common practice in intensive
poultry keeping is to have the yards connecting directly with the
house compartments small, making no effort to keep vegetation in
them, then have a large grass yard adjoining to which any flock may
be admitted at will, and alternate the flocks on this for brief periods.
One of the most common ways of arranging alternating yards with
a continuous house is to have the yards both south and north of
the house, using the former in winter and the latter in summer.
Fence material. }%re. The most common poultry fencing is
the hexagonal- or octagonal-mesh woven-wire netting known every-
where as poultry netting. A number of brands of rectangular-mesh
wire fencing for poultry have been put on the market. These have
the advantage of ‘following the ground ”’ without bulging, and it
is easier to do a neat job of fencing with them, but the wires, being
galvanized before weaving, rust quickly, and few poultrymen buy
fencing of this kind a second time. The ordinary netting, galva-
nized after weaving, is cheaper and (so far) has proved more dur-
able and altogether more satisfactory wherever a light fence will
answer. For heavier fence for protection for poultry the other
styles of wire fencing may be used, and though it has not been the
practice to paint fences of this kind, it would undoubtedly pay to do
so! Even a well-galvanized fencing rusts very quickly sometimes,
1 What is said here of the durability of rectangular-mesh wire fencing applies
to brands that have been in use up to the time of writing (1911). The life of these
varies; some begin to rust almost immediately ; some are good for several years.
Any fence of this style, with suitable-sized mesh, will be more generally satisfac-
tory than the other when this fault of rusting is fully remedied.
YARDS AND FENCES 99
when vines are allowed to run on it, the zinc coating often oxidiz-
ing much more rapidly where vines cling than along the ground
where the grass binds it.
Posts. Any light wooden post will answer for poultry fences.
When the fence is for poultry only, posts may be of small diam-
eter, especially if of durable wood. Where many posts four or
five inches in diameter are to be set, it is better to sharpen
one end, square the other and trim to allow placing on it a heavy
iron ring or cap (to prevent splitting and shattering), and drive the
posts instead of digging post holes and setting. When posts for
high fences are driven, the best way is to load the prepared posts
onto a wagon, leaving room forward for a man to stand to drive them,
start the holes with a crowbar, and let the man standing on the wagon
drive them with a heavy maul, a man on the ground making the
holes and holding the posts in place for the other to drive. Usinga
team and two men in this way, posts may be driven very rapidly and
will be much firmer than if set. Old iron gas or water pipe cut into
suitable lengths is sometimes used for poultry-fence posts, and is
especially adapted to use in rocky land where wooden posts cannot
be driven. The pipe post has the great advantage that it need not
be driven straight but may go in the ground at any angle the stone
permits, and when down deep enough the part above the ground
is easily brought to the perpendicular by bending. Wire fencing
is attached to such posts with wire. The fence is a very satisfac-
tory one.
For all wire fences the posts may be about 12 feet apart, and
when the ground at the point where a post should go contains
stones or roots which make it difficult to dig post holes or im-
possible to drive posts, it makes no difference if that post is shifted
a foot or even 2 feet in either direction ; for, while it is not advis-
able to make the regular distance between posts more than 12 feet,
an occasional increase or decrease of the distance makes no notice-
able difference in either the looks or the strength of the fence.
When a single board is used at the base, a post which comes in
the middle of a board may be set out of regular position if there is
any advantage in it. If, as is usual when boards are used, the base
is carried up two feet, it is advisable to set the posts eight feet
apart and break joints in putting on the boards, for with light posts
100 POULTRY CULTURE
even as low a tight board fence as this gets a strong pressure
from the wind, and to make it durable the builder must make use
of every device that will add to its strength without materially in-
creasing the cost. In general, it is better not to use boards at all, but
to make the lower part of a fence of fine meshed wire, using this
on both sides of the posts if valuable males are to be kept in ad-
joining yards. The first cost of such a fence may be greater than
when boards are used for the first two feet from the ground, but it
gives better circulation of air in small or narrow yards, looks bet-
ter, and is better adapted to construction on stony ground and for
movable houses. For temporary yards, especially when low fences
are used, the easiest way to prevent males fighting through the
fence is to make parallel fences about a foot apart. In many cases
the extra fence may be removed after a few days, when the birds
have become familiar with each other and are less inclined to
quarrel. When double fences are used on ostrich farms, the dis-
tance between the fences is three or four feet.
Openings in fences. Gates are the weak points in fences, —a con-
stant cause of trouble to the poultry keeper whose work requires that
flocks be kept separate. It is hard to make gates that will be quickly
and easily opened and closed by a person carrying or wheeling a
load, and that will at the same time be secure when closed. The best
solution of the problem is to use gates as little as possible. The
colony system does away with all gates for poultry, the gates or bars
between fields being adapted only to larger stock. With low fences
(up to three feet high) that a man of medium height can easily step
over, gates may be provided or omitted according to the amount of
use. Ifa gate is needed frequently, as for passage with a wheelbarrow
or to drive stock from one yard to another, a gate on hinges should
be provided. If an opening in the fence would be used only at
rare intervals, a section of a permanent fence may be made movable.
In a temporary fence of netting on stakes, openings are easily made
at the end of a strip of the netting, the removal of a few staples
admitting of opening the space between two stakes. The more in-
tensive the plant, and the longer the houses, the more troublesome
the gate problem appears. With high permanent fences, gates to
give passage to all yards are necessary, even though used only
at long intervals. If there is direct passage from each interior
YARDS AND FENCES IOI
compartment of a poultry house to its corresponding yard, the out-
side gates need be used only in taking care of yards, removing and
replacing litter, sand, etc., and with such infrequent use it is not
necessary to make their opening and closing in any degree ** auto-
matic.” None of the many (so-called) automatic hinges, springs,
catches, bolts, etc. used on outside gates work well for both open-
ing and closing and give security in strong winds and against dogs
or other small animals that might try to force them. For this reason
most poultry keepers whose stock is quite closely yarded, after a
little experience with outside gates, abandon their use for regular
passage in getting from flock to flock in the same building, and
go through the house, where the use of spring hinges and weights
to make doors self-closing and secure without fastening is practical.
Construction of gates should correspond to construction of fences,
the gates being made as light as is consistent with strength. For
fences up to four feet high small gates may be of either lath or wire
netting on a light frame of furring. For higher fences heavier
material should be used. For openings for the passage of a cart the
frame must be stiff and well braced. The width of a single gate
is usually adapted to passage with a wheelbarrow. The maximum
requirement is three feet. For the ordinary-sized garden wheelbar-
row two feet eight inches will answer, but there is no gain in cutting
down the width, and it is an advantage to have gates so wide that
a man with a wheelbarrow does not have to consider his knuckles.
Hinges for light gates, little used, may be as small as four inches,
either a strap or a T-hinge being used. For gates much used, heavier
hinges are preferable. A hinge too light for the use to which it is
put not only gives out quickly but allows the gate to sag and rock.
Hooks with staples or screw eyes make the most convenient and
economical fastenings. They should be so adjusted that the gate
is held snug when closed.
CHAPTER IX
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY
Poultry architecture in general is conspicuous for endless, and
often meaningless, variety in proportions and details. This variety
extends to every form of structure for every purpose. From the
fact that, provided a few simple rules are observed and other
factors properly handled, equally good results may be secured in
coops and houses differing in many
details, such variety is inevitable.
But variety is enormously increased
because of the number of inexpe-
rienced builders who incorporate
into the plans that they use un-
tested ideas of their own. The
features thus produced are some-
times objectionable, sometimes
Fic. 99. Stone poultry house about merely superfluous, rarely of any
200 years old on the farm of F.W. value, though some such features
ea blinyy “Tiverton Hour Genmers have at times been widely imitated
Rhode Island? y
because of their supposed relation
to good results secured or claimed. In the treatment of the sub-
ject in this chapter, discussion of the various styles of structures
required for different kinds of poultry, for different branches of
the work, and for breeds at different stages of growth will be
limited to the more representative styles illustrating the evolution
1 This is the type of poultry house built by the early settlers in Rhode Island.
The houses shown in this and the two following illustrations are supposed to have
been built in the latter part of the seventeenth or early in the eighteenth century,
and to have been used continuously for poultry ever since. As originally con-
structed, the ground floors were several feet below the outside ground level, but
in both of these houses the floors have been filled in. Access to the loft in the
Almy house is by inside stairway. The loft in the Borden house is entered direct
from outside, as shown in Fig. 1o1. It is said that before the colony system
came into use, nearly every farm in this district had one of these houses. A few
remain in a good state of preservation, but most have fallen into decay.
102
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 103
of ideas of poultry housing, the principles now best established,
and the range within which variations from approved plans may
be made without disadvantage. This mode of treatment presents
substantially every gen-
eral design and signifi-
cant feature that has at
any time within the last
seventy years been ex-
tensively used or seri-
ously considered by ex-
perienced poultrymen.
Prime considerations
in shelters for poultry. arn re i
sy 4: FIG. 100. stone poultry house, well preserved
In building shelters for and still used, on the Thomas H. Borden farm,
poultry there are three Tiverton Four Corners, Rhode Island
prime considerations :
the comfort of the birds, the convenience of the caretaker, and
the cost. These items are not always in accord. A building or
coop that is comfortable for its small feathered occupants may be
very inconvenient for the person who takes care of them, and
structures planned with special reference to the convenience of
the attendant do not,
as a rule, furnish the
most satisfactory con-
ditions for the poultry
keptin them. Neither
the comfortof the birds
nor the convenience of
the attendant is nec-
essarily proportionate
to cost of construction.
On the contrary, elab-
Fic. 101. Rear of Fig 100, showing door for en- orate plans and expen-
trance to loft and ventilation of lower room sive construction often
mean more work for
the poultryman and the least favorable conditions for the poultry.
In planning a structure for any purpose the problem is to secure
the best adjustment of these three things.
104 POULTRY CULTURE
Principal requirements in comfortable shelters for poultry.
Poultry require fresh air, sunlight, dryness, and room. Of these
by far the most important is fresh air. The essential condition of
dryness depends much upon free circulation of fresh air. Air and
sunlight are nature's best disinfectants and germicides, and if a coop
or house is not overcrowded, and the birds are in normal, healthy
condition, a properly aired and sunned structure requires much less
attention to cleanliness than one that is deficient in these particulars.
Warmth is not a requisite in a house for birds which are well-
feathered, healthy, and have no tender appendages, as large combs
and wattles. For unfeathered young birds the quarters must be |
heated artificially, or so arranged that the heat thrown off by
the birds, supplementing the heat of their bodies, will keep the
temperature high enough to prevent chilling, while fresh air is
still admitted in sufficient quantities. The latter requirement is the
theory on which all so-called waziz houses have been constructed.
The point to be noted is that the unfeathered birds must have
warmth, while the more mature stock does not require it. All these
points will come out more clearly as the history of modern ideas
in construction is briefly sketched in succeeding paragraphs.
Earliest form of shelter for poultry. An empty barrel (coop),
still often used and recommended for a hen and brood, or for a nest
for large birds (as the turkey and goose), was in all probability
the first form of poultry shelter. Aside from the interesting fact
that the adaptation of barrels to such uses gave us the name now
used for a small shelter or inclosure, especially for poultry, the
early and continued use of the barrel to shelter poultry has peculiar
significance to the student of the subject because, though a make-
shift with some features which would not be reproduced in a
structure designed for poultry, the barrel placed on its side pre-
sents in a primitive way what are now recognized as the first
principles in poultry-house construction: sufficient shelter, perfect
ventilation, and height appropriate to the size of the creatures
which are to inhabit it. The use of the barrel is necessarily limited
to a few purposes and a small number of individuals.
Simplest form of shelter made for poultry. The familiar style
of coop called the A-shaped coop, or tent coop, in which we have
shelter provided at the minimum expense for materials and labor,
Fic. to2. Barrel coops in use in New Fic. 103. Tent coop made of barre}
England in 1911 staves
Fic. tog. Modification of tent coop, Fic. 105. Like Fig. 104. with front
with open front. Hentetheredto coop — partly closed. Tethering hens with
by string attached to leg broods was common a generation ago
Fic. 106. Modern double-pitch roof FIG. 107. Rear of coop in Fig. 106,
coop on farm of F. W.C. Almy showing small ventilator
EVOLUTION OF THE TENT COOP
105
106 POULTRY CULTURE
Vic, 108. Old shoe box used us
a chicken coop
Fic. 109. Box coop with wire front,
used without run
appears to have been first made of
barrel staves. This style of coop
has been made in all sizes, from
the small coop, barely large enough
for a hen to stand and turn in, toa
building capable of accommodating
a hundred fowls. Such large sizes
are, however, unusual. The most
common size of coop of this type
for a flock of adult fowls is about
8 feet square on the ground and
from 6 to 8 feet high, designed to
accommodate from twelve to fifteen
hens. This style of coop, in small
sizes, was probably designed quite
as early as the barrel was used, and
has been used ever since. It is not
known that at any time, down to
within a few years, those making
such coops gave any thought to
the point of conformity to correct
principles. The idea in building
them seems always to have been
to make the cheapest thing that
would serve the purpose. Those
who, within the past few
generations, have tried to
make the best possible
coops and houses for
poultry have generally
kept away from this type,
considering it not much
of an advance over the
makeshift barrel coop or
the improvised shelter of
poles and straw or corn-
Fic. 110. Box coop used with run, as shown stalks sometimes used on
in Fig. 112
farms. They overlooked
——
Fra.iit, Coops with A-shapest slatted Pig. 112. Bas coops like that in Fig. 110,
runs. (Photograph from M. K. Boyer) with square-tupped slatted runs
Vic. 113. Coop with large folding ran Fic. «14. Showing wire ran in Pig. 113
for protection from cats. Sidesoft-inch, fulded. Sides fold under top; ends, with
top of z-inch mesh wire parliament hinges, fold over if
Fic. 115. Brood of goslings in coop Fic.116. Ducklings in coop with wire
with stake and wire yard yard. (Photograph from E. T. Brown)
COOPS WITH RUNS FOR YOUNG POULTRY
107
108 POULTRY CULTURE
the fact that this type of coop, or house, if of sufficient depth from
front to rear to keep the occupants protected from such storms as
would beat in at the front (which was often open as in the barrel
coop), provided the three essentials, — shelter, ventilation, and, in
the common sizes, appropriate height.
Poultry housed under the same roof as their owner. In the
British Isles the keeping of poultry in the dwelling house appears
to have been quite common as recently as eighty years ago and
possibly up to a much more recent date. In “ The Poultry Yard:
a Practical View of the Best Method of Selecting, Rearing, and
Breeding the Various Species of Domestic Fowl,” by Peter Boswell,
of Greenlaw, the author, in describing primitive methods of keep-
ing poultry, mentions three as specially suited to the cottager.
What he calls the ‘simplest form”’ is a lean-to “at the gable
end of the cottage, as‘near as possible to the opposite side of the
kitchen fire, at ‘which part, and for this purpose, the wall might
be made thinner.” As “the cottager’s best’ he recommends “a
part of the space next the roof, so often unoccupied and useless,”
adding, ‘“‘ To accomplish the object, a part of it next the kitchen-
fire gable end should be partitioned off, floored, and fitted up with
baulks and laying places.’”” When fowls were thus housed, they
had access to their loft by means of a hen ladder from an opening
through the outer wall to the ground. The third method, called
“the cottager’s own’ but recommended only to those who could
make no other provision for poultry, was to allow the fowls to
roost in “the upper part of the space at the door” at night and
run in the road by day.
The custom, among the poorest class, of keeping fowls in dwell-
ings has a historical value, because it appears that the thriftiness
and productiveness of many flocks so kept are largely responsible
for the idea that, to lay in winter, fowls must be kept warm ; this
seems to have been made a fundamental principle in expert poultry-
house construction long before the modern period, and until a few
years ago was regarded as essential.
Tight houses. The theory that winter egg production depended
upon high temperatures led naturally to the construction of tight
houses. That having been assumed, it was necessary either to heat
the houses artificially or to so construct them that they would
bic. 117. Roosting coop fer weaned Fic. 18. Roosting cuop fer weaned
chicks, used by Lester Tompkins, chicks. Poors closed. ventilators
Concord, Massachusetts. Doors and open, Board shade thrown back on
ventilators upen root af cuop
Fic. tty. Roosting coop for weaned Fic. 120. Roosting coap with doors
chicks. Board shade resting on haif- closed and shade down to close
open duors ventilators
Fic. 121. Roosting coop used by Fic. 122. Same as Fig. 121, panels
C. H. Wyckoff and Son, Aurora, in lower doors. (Photographs from
‘New York Wyckoff and Son)
TWO NEAT, CONVENIENT ROOSTING COOPS
109
Fic. 123. Heated poultry house, in Fic. 124. Cold tight poultry house.
central New York in Massachusetts
Bic. 125. Tight house with straw loft, Fie. 126. House tight except front;
in central New York has open joints between boards
Fic. 127. Section of scratching-shed Fic. 128. Cold house; single boards
house with a closed roosting room with battens; doors closed only to
(Photograph from A. F, Hunter) keep out rain and snow
FROM THE HEATED HOUSE TO THE OPEN-FRONT COLD HOUSE
110
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY III
exclude cold and retain the heat thrown off by the occupants. Arti-
ficial heating was often tried and usually discarded after a short
trial as of no advantage, though in a trip through central New York
some years ago the author found many poultry houses in which
large stoves were used and considered an advantage. In general,
Fic. 130. Tight house with large windows always kept slightly open at
the top for ventilation
it was thought better to build houses tight and warm. To accom-.
plish this, various methods were used. The cheapest construction
supposed to answer the purpose was made by covering the frame
of the house with boards, and these with two thicknesses of build-
ing paper, the outer one weatherproof. For more effective protection
112 POULTRY CULTURE
from cold, it was common to use double boards with paper between
and weatherproof paper over the outer boards. Sometimes the out-
side was shingled over a paper sheathing. Many houses were built
with dead-air spaces throughout the walls, made by putting one
layer of boards and one of paper on each side of the studding.
Occasionally houses were lathed and plastered inside. The limit
was probably reached by a poultryman in an eastern state who made
his walls with three thicknesses of boards, three of paper, and two
dead-air spaces. In harmony with such construction were the
tight-fitting doors and windows used, both doors and windows
often being double.
Ventilation in tight houses. Theoretically, ventilation was fur-
nished either by ventilators alone or by ventilators supplemented,
during fine weather or through the warmer hours of the day, by
careful adjustment of doors and windows; but many houses were
built without ventilators, on the theory that the building contained
air enough to supply the fowls for several days, if doors and win-
dows were closed as long as that. That the ventilators usually did
not ventilate was shown by the fact that the houses, when closed,
became damp and moisture condensed on the wall just as often
when an approved method of ventilating through ventilators was
used as when no ventilators were provided.
In the light of recent experiences with cold houses it seems
probable that the failures of most of the old methods of ventilation
were due to the small sizes of ventilators used. The ineffectiveness
of these was often aggravated by obstructions in the ventilator de-
signed to prevent a too rapid movement of air. In warm houses
the problem of securing sufficient ventilation while retaining the
heat is a serious one, especially when moisture collects on interior
walls and the litter on the floors becomes damp and the air inside
the house moist and foul. The most satisfactory solutions of the
problem were the straw loft and the open-front scratching-shed
house, the first designed to overcome by absorption the dampness
in the closed house, the other providing abundance of fresh air
in the daytime.
Beginning of the fresh-air movement. The scratching-shed
house was a marked step in the direction of right principles
of poultry-house construction, and toward the open, thoroughly
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 113
ventilated house, which, it is now generally agreed, is, all things
considered, the best type of poultry house. Houses of the open-
front scratching-shed type have been used here and there since the
middle of the last century, but it was not until after 1890, when the
extension of interest in poultry was increasing the number of those
who were having trouble in warm houses, that any general interest
was manifested in them. Then for a few years they were exploited
as a remedy for the difficulties in warm houses, and became very
popular. The term ‘‘open-front scratching-shed house” was
applied particularly to the plan used and exploited by one man,
but the idea was applied, in variously modified forms, to many other
styles of houses. As is usual, the merits were much exaggerated.
Experience with the open-front scratching-shed house showed
that the fowls would remain in the open shed the greater part of
the daytime, and that the capacity of the two compartments thus
became only the capacity of the one compartment that the birds
frequented. The open front of the scratching shed was intended
to be open only during fine weather. At other times it was to be
closed with curtains, which were at first of oz/ed cotton cloth on
frames. This material was used and recommended as an econom-
ical substitute for glass sash. The difficulty, in many places, of
getting oiled cloth led to a very general substitution of ordinary
cheap cloth and burlap, both of which admitted considerable air
through the meshes. Improved conditions as a result of better air
thus supplied brought about a very general use of such materials in
place of glass in a part or all of the windows of closed houses.
The idea that fowls must be kept warm was a fundamental
principle in the management of fowls in scratching-shed houses
and in the numerous adaptations of the plan made in houses of
other types. The birds were to be kept warm by constant exercise
in the litter in which their grain was fed on the floor of the scratch-
ing shed, or scratching room (as the case might be), while at night
they kept warm in the close roosting room, or the reduced form
of it called the roosting closet, or roost box, built with a hinged
front or burlap curtain to retain the heat when the fowls were on the
roost. It was commonly observed that fowls were likely to be more
thrifty and free from disease in these houses when the keeper neg-
lected to take precautions to keep them warm at night. Again, when
114 POULTRY CULTURE
curtains of cotton cloth and burlap exposed to the weather were
rotted out, it was not uncommon to delay renewing them, and no
bad effects seemed to follow. Such things, and numerous instances
remembered or observed of flocks of fowls doing well through cold
winters in mere shells of houses, gradually broke down in many
minds the notion that fowls must have warm houses, until, in the
early years of this century, progressive poultry keepers began to
realize that many of the despised makeshifts and flimsy structures
of more primitive times, and of shiftless poultry keepers of their
own times, were essentially better than their best structures designed
according to principles upon which they had been working.
Houses with open fronts. In these, as is to be expected, con-
siderable variety is found, but in general a house of this type
belongs to one of two classes: Either it is an open house of
such proportions, and with roosts so placed, that, theoretically, the
fowls, when roosting, are kept warm, because they are so far from
the open front and the rate of movement of air in the house is so
slow that a considerable part of the heat they diffuse benefits them ;
or it is a cold house, in which the heat thrown off by the birds can
have no appreciable effect on the temperature about them. In
houses of the first class the air entering the front is supposed to
make no draft to which the fowls on the roosts would be exposed ;
in houses of the second class drafts are disregarded. Those who
advocate and use the zvarm open-front house have apparently not
fully abandoned the idea that the fowls must be kept in a tempera-
ture sensibly higher than that outside, and must be protected from
direct currents of air entering the house from without. Those who
advocate and use cold houses hold that, within a limit (practically
the degree of frost that the combs of the male birds will withstand),
fowls may be accustomed to low temperatures ; that it is not the
absolute degree of cold that injures them or stops egg production,
but the variations of temperature ; and that fowls accustomed to
the lowest temperatures and free supplies of fresh air are least
affected by these.
No best house. There are not marked regular variations of
results in houses differing as to warmth or any other one feature.
The fact that results equally good in every way have been ob-
tained in many different types of houses under a great variety of
Fie. 131. Single-section scratching- Fic. 132. Colony house with seratch-
shed house, used without yard ing shed attached
Fic. 133. Two sections of scratching-shed house at North Carolina Experiment
Station. (Photograph from the station)
Lanedes iL x. iM
Fic. 134. Tillinghast house with scratch- Fic. 135. Tolman and Woods houses
ing floor in front of roosts. (Photograph at Colorado Agricultural College
from Connecticut Agricultural College) (Photograph from the college)
SCRATCHING-SHED AND SCRATCHING-ROOM HOUSES
IIs
116 POULTRY CULTURE
conditions shows that the important thing is not that a building
for poultry shall be of a particular pattern, but that, whatever its
pattern, conditions in it be regulated to meet the requirements of
the birds for fresh air and dry quarters. This can be done in any
type of house that is not radically wrong. But the warmer the
birds are kept, —the higher the range of temperature to which
they are accustomed, —the more necessary it is that the attendant
give close attention to ventilating through doors and windows, and
in practice it is too often found impossible to attend to this at the
proper times. The cold open house may be so constructed as to
require no manipulation whatever for ventilation and no attention
to doors and windows except for the exclusion of rain and snow.
Between these extremes are intermediate types requiring much or
little regulation according to construction and arrangement. Each
has its place. Whoever keeps a delicate breed, or one having a
tender feature, in a cold locality must use warm houses and give
as much attention as necessary to proper regulation of conditions
in them. Whether it is more profitable to do this than to keep
a hardier breed in a cheaper building, with less labor, is a point
that each must determine for himself.
Floor dimensions. In a structure for poultry the floor area is
determined on the basis of the number of birds to be kept in it
and the proportion of time that they are to be confined to it. The
space per bird required varies inversely with the number of birds
in the flock, small flocks requiring much more space per bird than
large flocks, because the bird is not like a plant or a tree, or like
horses and cattle in barns, located in one place and constantly
occupying it, but each bird in the flock has the use of the entire
floor, less only the space actually occupied by its mates. A flock
of ten or twelve hens can be comfortably housed in a building 8
feet square (which allows 5 or 6 square feet of floor space per
fowl), if they can get outside for a good part of the time. If con-
fined almost constantly to the house, the same flock should have
about 50 per cent more floor space. With increasing size of flocks
the ‘per hen” space may be reduced gradually until from seventy-
five to a hundred hens have about 4 square feet each. Very small
flocks need relatively large ‘‘per hen” areas. A single bird needs
almost as much room as ten or twelve.
Vie. 136. Two-pen house built by two Fic. 137. Pour-pen breeding house at
men in less than half a day. ‘Vhis suits Wisconsin Agricultural College. (Vhoto-
fowls as well as any kind of house graph trum the college)
Fic. 138. Two-pen opern-front house with front openings shortened 10 keep out
rain and snow, giving same result as projecting reof in Pig.137. (Vhotograph
from CC. M. Newton)
Fic. 139. Cotton-front house in Fic. 140. Cotton-front house in
Minnesota. (Photograph from Minnesota. (Photograph from
D. J. Lane) D. J. Lane)
OPEN-FRONT AND COTTON-FRONT HOUSES
117
118 POULTRY CULTURE
Height of poultry structures. In small structures which the
attendant does not have to enter, or enters infrequently, the height
of the building is usually adapted to the poultry; in larger struc-
tures it is adapted to the attendant. The lower houses furnish the
best conditions for the birds, but, though that point has not been
carefully investigated, it does not appear that the conditions in a
house three or four feet high are so materially better than in a
house high enough for a man to stand and work in (about six
feet) as to make it advisable to reduce the height when that would
mean a reduction of floor space and of the size of flocks.
Depth of poultry structures. The depth of poultry structures
should be proportionate to their height. In order that an interior
may be properly sunned and ventilated, the depth, or distance from
the front to the rear wall, must bear such proportion to the height
of the front wall that sunlight will penetrate well back. As the
elevation of the sun varies with the seasons, it is manifestly impos-
sible to make a structure of fixed height and width in which the
desired condition will be obtained at all seasons, but if the height
of the front be about half the width of the building, the average
conditions will be as nearly right in this respect as they can be
made. Since it has already been determined that the height of the
larger shelter for poultry should be near the minimum height of a
building in which a man can work expeditiously, it follows that the
fixing of such a standard of height, and of the relation of height
to width, limits the width to about twelve or fourteen feet.
In a single house, or in a two-pen house which may be lighted
and ventilated with windows or doors on the sides in addition to
those in the front (south), the depth may be as much greater as de-
sired, the side openings carrying light and air back. This arrange-
ment is not adapted to the continuous-house plan with more than
two pens, because the side openings affect only the end compart-
ments. It is not nearly so much used as the plan with all openings
in the front. Its advantage is most obvious when it is desired to
make for a larger flock a compartment that will be well lighted
and ventilated without increasing the height or making the length
so great that the faults of long, narrow houses will be introduced.
Even with the use of side openings the depth is rarely increased
more than 50 per cent over what it would be by the rule given.
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 119
Standard-size poultry-house unit. Taking 6 feet as the most
convenient standard for a full-height poultry house, and 12 feet as
the most appropriate depth for a house of that height, we have two
of the dimensions for a standard unit of size of poultry house. The
advantages of a square floor over others (to be explained shortly)
make it fitting to have the third dimension the same as the second
(12 feet). This makes the standard-size single house or compart-
ment 6 ft. x 12 ft. x 12 ft. This is a medium in form and di-
mensions for single houses, and nearly all the common plans of
houses may be treated as modifications of it; on the whole, the
most convenient unit for a continuous or compartment house.
Diagrams of a single standard-size poultry house will be found
on page 121.
The use of such a standard or basic unit in the study of poultry-
house plans should not be misunderstood. It may be, and often is,
desirable to vary these dimensions, but such a house has capacity
at all seasons, in all climates, for as large a flock of average adult
fowls as the average poultry keeper handles to advantage, is con-
venient for a person of any height, may be fully sunned and
aired by means of openings in the front, and is adapted to single-
compartment construction or to any number of compartments ;
while the measurements are such that, in nearly all dimensions of
lumber required in construction, 12-foot lengths cut to advantage.
A house of these dimensions is no better than one differing some-
what from them, but these measurements are most suitable for a
standard, for a basis of a comparison of features in poultry houses,
and for a base from which to work in designing poultry houses. Vari-
ations from them should be made for a definite purpose. If they
accomplish that purpose without introducing something objection-
able, they give a better style of building for the purpose. If a
change introduces objectionable features as well as advantages,
these must be considered and the right adjustment found. These
points will be illustrated in the descriptions and discussions of
various features of poultry houses in following paragraphs.
Length of poultry structures. The length (front) of a single
poultry house (or section) should approximately equal its depth or
width. The greatest economy of space and construction is at-
tained in a square building. There are, however, some advantages
120 POULTRY CULTURE
in making the length a little greater than the width. The floor
space (and so the capacity of the house) may be increased without
changing height and width or materially affecting any interior
condition. If the outside runs must correspond with the width of
the house, the width and area of the run are very materially in-
creased. An increase of 25 per cent in area over the standard
may be made in this way, but it is not advisable to attempt to add
still more room in one house and run by this means. Houses
have been built, of standard width and height, with length up to or
over one hundred feet and used for one large flock. At one time,
also, the continuous long house, divided into many compartments
by partitions of wire netting or slats, was a favorite. Many houses
of that type may still be found. But in common experience it is
found advisable to limit the length of the house, or of a com-
partment, to very nearly its width. One reason for this is that the
flock in an almost square room is less disturbed by the attendant
moving about ; the birds have more room to pass him. In a long
house the birds, if at all shy, will rush to the end of the house,
and if the flock is large, the disturbance and crowding may be
serious. In all very long houses that the writer has seen in use,
the flock, though large for a single flock, has been only about
half the total number that could be carried in the same space in
compartments of standard size.
The objection to the long house with many compartments and
open partitions between is that the air draws through a long, nar-
row, low house as through a huge flue, making the house very un-
comfortable. It is found in practice that it is not advisable to build
a house of this type without making every third or fourth partition
solid, and most poultrymen using houses of this kind prefer to
make every other partition solid. In a house of the dimensions
recommended, it does not appear that there is any advantage in
making every partition between pens tight ; but in long houses of
greater height and width the draft may be so great as to make it
advisable to do this.
Thus it is evident that, to make the best house conditions for
the poultry, the quarters for each flock, or family, whether de-
tached from the quarters of other flocks or adjoining them, must
be complete. Then the long house of many compartments appears
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 121
not as a single house but as a series of standard houses so placed
that the sides and roofs are continuous, and that one end of each
house, after the first, may be dispensed with.
The significance of the distinction is that when the continuous
house is considered and constructed as a series of standard-size
houses, the conditions desirable in a poultry house are obtained in
the same way in every part of the
series, but that when the series is re-
garded as the unit, almost invariably
a construction seems admissible which
gives different conditions in different
divisions, and very unsatisfactory con-
ditions in most of them.
Styles of roof. The equal-slope
double-pitch roof and the shed roof
are the styles of roof most used for
poultry houses. In single, very nearly
Fic. 142. Front elevation
Fic. 144. East (end) elevation,
battened
ROOSTS
PLATFORM
NESTS
NESTS
Fic. 141. Ground plan
Fic. 143. Front frame
ROOSTS
NESTS
es
PLATFORM |
Fic.145. End frame and cross
section
DIAGRAMS OF STANDARD-SIZE POULTRY-HOUSE UNIT
(Scale, 3-inch to the foot)
O pue g jo aulvay ! Jo uoneaay ‘gh ‘Bly Jo Owes pue UONeAa|a juolg “Lh1 OL
19]U99 Jo ysva uad paay ‘9 {WOO paay pue 2103s
yeaquas ‘ty {uad pua-jsam ‘fr *suoIjo—as payqiwo Zuyvoipul saul] aptsino ur syeaiq ‘asnoy Ay[nod Buoy jo uxjd punoiy ‘gbI ‘ory
I ce a ———S=SSS=SS———=H
ROOSTS
PLATFORM
aq { \ Aa
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 123
square, structures the sides of a double-pitch roof may face
either north and south or east and west. In houses with two or
more compartments a double-pitch roof must, as a rule, face north
and south; in single-
compartment houses the
tent-roof type of con-
struction may be used (or
approached), with sides
very low and the slopes
of the roof facing east
and west. Shed or single-
pitch roofs on_ single-
compartment houses may
|
A
pe
i
Fic. 148. End frame of long house in
Figs. 146 and 147
pitch in any direction desired ; on houses with two or more com-
partments they must, as a rule, pitch either north or south, — and
preferably south, because
that gives the greatest
amount of sun in the
house with the most eco-
nomical construction. Be-
sides these simple styles
of roof several others are
occasionally used.
Double-pitch roofs with
unequal sides are some-
_~
\
Fic. 149. Partition (next to roosts) between
pens in house in Figs. 146 and 147
times made to adapt the roof to other features of construction.
Thus in some brooder houses with sunken walks in the rear, the
roof has a long pitch to the south,
over the pens, and a short pitch
to the north, over the walk. In
some of the open-front plans of
houses, too, the front slope of the
roof is longer than the other, and
sometimes at a different angle. In
what is known as the semimonitor-
Tt
a
ee
top style of construction the part
of the house under the front slope is several feet lower than that
under the rear slope of the roof, to allow placing windows in the
Fic. 150. Partition between pen and
alley in house in Figs. 146 and 147
Fig. 131. Shed roof sloping to rear Fic, 152. Semimonitor-top roof
Lest style of this roof (Photograph from H. P. Nottage}
BiG. 133. Lrooder house with double-pitch roof. Long slope to front, short
slope to rear, (Photograph from Fisher's Island Farm)
Fic. 154. Open-front house with shed Fic. 155. Rear of Fig. 154. (Photo-
roof sloping to front graph from L. A. Doize, New Orleans)
STYLES OF POULTRY-HOUSE ROOFS
124
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 125
perpendicular space above the
lower roof, for the better light-
ing and ventilation of the rear
part of the house. Occasion
for introducing such features
usually indicates fault in the
general design of the structure.
Walls. Walls of structures
for poultry should always be
perpendicular. This applies to
every form and size of house
or coop designed for poultry.
Whatever may be tolerated in
a converted coop or building,
the walls of one designed for
poultry should be perpendicular.
When one function of the
glass window was to warm the
interior of a closed building
by the sun, houses were built
with sloping front walls, in
order that the windows might
be placed at the angle that
would make them most effec-
tive for that purpose. This
form of construction was un-
satisfactory, even when it had
supposed advantages.
Floors. Within the same
walls and under the same roof,
floors should be on the same
level. They are always made
so in small buildings, but when
long houses are placed on
ground which slopes with the
length of the house, builders
sometimes make a_ building
with roof following the slope
ae
36. Breeding stuck and feed In
at Colorado Agricultural Callege. (Phoua-
graph from the college)
Fic. 157. Raised walk in front of house
in Vig. 136. (Photograph from Colorado
Agricultural College}
Fic. 158. House with covered raised
walk in front
126 POULTRY CULTURE
of the land. This may not be a serious fault if there are tight
cross partitions at short distances,! but if the length of the space
between close division walls is greater than about thirty feet, there
is likely to be a quite marked difference in temperature between
the higher and lower ends, and drafty conditions on that account.
The exterior of such a building is unsightly. When the ground is
so uneven, the best way is to make a series of sections on different
levels, each higher section one or two steps above the next lower
one, the length of the sections to be determined by the grade.
Eccentric features in poultry houses and coops are to be avoided.
As a tule, the plainest, simplest style of structure that will answer
the purpose gives best general satisfaction. Exterior features de-
signed to give special adjustments of a coop or house to a variety
of conditions are often objectionable because of the attention that
they require. Elaborate interior arrangements designed to save labor
rarely accomplish that object. Extra features, outside or inside,
add greatly to the original outlay for equipment, and to the amount
of investment on which interest, taxes, etc. must be earned before
actual revenue is obtained. With capital limited, as it usually is,
it is much better policy to cut out all unnecessary features and to
save as much as possible for stock and for working capital. One
of the most common mistakes in poultry keeping is that of put-
ting so much of the available capital into buildings that the poultry-
man is hampered for a long time for money for other expenses.
Materials used for poultry structures. [l’ovd is more extensively
used than all other materials combined. Nearly all movable build-
ings and coops are made of wood, and it is the principal material
in most of the larger structures. When it is desired to make the
cost of construction as low as possible, and a tight construction is
-necessary, the cheapest of lumber is used, and the inside of the
building covered with a substantial roofing paper. If it is not
necessary to have tight walls and roof, a grade of boards as much
better as the builder desires may be used. With common boards
this gives the cheapest construction. Shzngles were formerly used
1] have seen long nursery brooder houses for ducklings with floor following
the slope of the land, that seemed to work well without partitions, but these were
artificially heated, and the partitions between pens were much higher than the
height of the ducklings.
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 127
very extensively to cover sides as well as roofs of poultry buildings,
but as they have steadily risen in price and gone down in quality,
while the quality of roofing paper has greatly improved, shingles
are now little used, except when conformity to surrounding build-
ings requires it.
The extensive use of wood for buildings for poultry comes about
because it is usually the cheapest available material, and because it
is material in which almost every poultry keeper who wishes to build
his own buildings can work. Any material used for other buildings
may be used: iron, stone, brick, clay, cement, are all used occa-
sionally for poultry houses. As a rule these are more economical
than wood only when they can be had very cheap or the poultry-
man is expert in working in them.
Glass is used only as necessary to give light when doors and
curtains are closed. For many years it was the practice to use as
much glass as possible, in order to heat the house through the
windows when the sun shone. With the introduction of fresh-air
types of houses the area of glass used has been reduced, and
sometimes glass has been discarded for cotton cloth or burlap.
Cotton cloth is extensively used in both door and window open-
ings. Its use depends primarily on its porosity: it admits air. With
a sufficient area of cloth to give what light is required on dull days
with all openings closed, no glass is needed. The relative amounts
of glass and cloth to be used must be determined according to the
design of the house and local conditions.
floor materials. Wherever the soil is of suitable character (sand
or loam, or a mixture of the two), and drainage such that it can be
kept in good condition, an earth floor is the best for all poultry
buildings. Where drainage is defective or the soil contains much
clay, movable structures should have floors of wood, and permanent
structures floors of wood or cement.
Quality of construction. The question of durability is of less
importance in the construction of poultry coops and buildings than
in most other lines of construction. Movable structures of any size
must be strong enough to stand the handling and moving to which
they are subjected. Permanent buildings, being nearly all low,
one-story buildings, may be of very light construction, as will be
shown in illustrations. All that is necessary is that there shall be
128 POULTRY CULTURE
frame enough to hold the shell firmly, that it be securely nailed, and
that the sills shall be either so placed or protected that they will not
rot, or put in so that when decayed they may be easily replaced.
Some of the most prac-
tical poultrymen put
sills right on the earth
and replace them when
necessary, finding it
cheaper in the long
tun to do this in
buildings of light con-
struction than to use
heavy sills and pro-
tect them to prevent
. the decay of the wood.
Durability has to be considered most in connection with materials
which are shorter-lived than wood, and with parts that receive wear.
When roofing paper is used for covering, it is economical to use
paper of good quality that with proper care may be expected to last
from fifteen to twenty years. Cloth is now often preferred to glass for
openings, because it is cheaper and admits some air; but cloth or
like porous material is so short-lived, when exposed to the weather,
that in the long run it may be
cheaper to use glass and leave
windows partly open, as we do in
our dwellings. If cement floors
are used they should be substan-
tially built ; a common mistake is
to make them too thin and with
an insufficient foundation. Such
floors crack and settle and become
Fic. 159. Incubator house at Ontario Agricultural
College. (Photograph from the college)
|
Fic. 160. Rear of long poultry house
uneven and very unsatisfactory,
and the faults cannot be rem-
edied except by taking off the old
cement and remaking the floor.
at the Ontario Agricultural College.
Gables and ventilators break the long
straight lines. (Photograph from the
college)
IVarmth is not given such consideration as formerly in the con-
struction of houses for adult and weaned birds, but in building in-
cubator and brooder houses, or other special buildings which are to
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 129
be heated, it is necessary to use double walls. For open-front or
fresh-air houses all that is necessary is to make the roof, back, and
ends wind-and rain-proof. The front need not be of tight con-
struction ; indeed, it has not been shown that, for birds not easily
affected by frost, there is any advantage in making the house with
perfectly tight roof, back, and ends. On the whole, the present
tendency is to make all kinds and sizes of structures for poultry
of the lightest construction that will serve.
Preservation of structures. When undressed lumber is used with-
out covering, no paint or wash is required, nor is it necessary to
put dressing or preservative of any kind on shingles. The wood
will last long enough without paint to make the unpainted building
cheaper in the long run, for such rough buildings cost more to
paint than others. When dressed lumber is used for exteriors, it is
advisable to paint it with oil and lead or mineral paints. There is
no advantage in using dressed lumber unless it is painted. Sash
should be kept well painted. Roofing papers last very much longer
if coated with paint or tar about once in two or three years. The
manufacturer’s instructions as to the kind of coating to use
should be followed, for some roofings require special dressings.
No treatment for preservation is necessary on ordinary rough in-
teriors, or on smooth surfaces of lumber used for frame or sides, but
if any doors or frames have closely fitted, glued joints, it is better
to keep them painted. Whitewash has been extensively used in
poultry houses, but as a cleanser, disinfectant, and insecticide
rather than for preservative properties. Many poultrymen will not
whitewash interiors of houses, claiming that, as the whitewash
accumulates on the walls, it holds moisture in damp weather to
an objectionable extent.
Structures for different kinds of poultry. Poultry coops and
houses are all designed on the same general principles and vary
little in appearance or arrangement. The same coop will answer
for small chicks, ducks, turkeys, or geese, but a brood of any of the
others will so quickly outgrow a coop that would serve for chicks
until weaned that it is advisable to provide larger coops or shelters
for them from the outset. The same construction of individual
brooder or brooder house will answer for young chickens and
young ducks, except that for young chickens the partitions must
130 POULTRY CULTURE
be higher. After they are feathered, no young birds need shelter
during the summer and fall except for protection from enemies.
Ducks and geese will remain outside at night by choice even in
severe winter weather, except when it is snowing or raining heavily.
Duck growers hatching early ducklings usually confine the ducks
indoors at night in winter and until all have laid in the morning.}
This is done to prevent eggs being chilled and also because it is
believed? that egg production is better than when the ducks are
allowed to follow their natural inclination and remain much out
on snow and ice.
Turkeys prefer to roost in the open the year round, either in
trees or in sheltered places, as beside a barn where they are not
fully exposed to winds from cold quarters. The roosting habit of
peafowl is the same as that of turkeys. Guineas also remain out
unless very severe weather drives them to cover, when they take
refuge with hens or in any convenient place.
Pheasants prefer to roost in low trees or shrubbery, but even
the wild birds will come to farm poultry houses when storms
are very severe and shut off their food supplies. When coops or
buildings are required to confine any of these, such a building as
is used for fowls will answer.
Nore. The photographs and diagrams on the preceding pages of this chapter
were selected with reference to the accompanying text. Those which follow,
supplementing them, show more fully the applications of principles, the details
of construction, and the adaptability of the simplest designs and most desirable
features to varied climates.
1 As a rule, waterfowl lay their eggs about daybreak, not more than a few hours
earlier or later.
2 The author’s personal experience in duck growing is not sufficient to enable
him to say positively that allowing ducks to get their feet cold is not necessarily
detrimental to laying. A great many poultry keepers consider that allowing hens
to run on snow and eat snow hinders egg production, though in the case of hens
the view is plainly a fallacy, as any one may discover who will allow hens comfort-
ably housed in fresh-air houses with littered floors to follow their inclination about
going on snow and ice and walking about in icy water. It will be found that even
the feather-legged breeds with heavy foot feathering suffer no discomfort when
they can go at will from snow ora sloppy yard to a floor of dry litter which quickly
dries their feet. On a bare or damp floor the feathers and feet would dry slowly.
On a bare earth floor they would become very dirty before drying. In either case
the effects would be bad. Ducks and geese sitting (rather lying) out on snow or
ice do not keep their feet on the ground but raise them and work them into the
feathers at the side of the body, where they are well protected.
Fic. 161. Primitive coop. Nowindow; fic. 162. Primitive coup. No window ;
small doer. Used on a Rhode Island larg: door. (Uhotograph by EL. de
farm Courcy, Ireland)
Fic. 163. Neat coop used ona Rhode Fic. 164g. Coup like that in Fig. 163, with
Island farm. Ifen confined wire screen over part of window
Fic. 165. Another common type of | Fic. 166. Good coop or small house
coop in Rhode Island used on a Maine farm
ANCIENT AND MODERN POULTRY COOPS
131
Fic.167. Two-compartment coop for Fic. 168. Cuops placed in pairs with
one indoor brooder. (Photographfrom — cloth shade between. (lhotograph
J.C. Pattison) from E. T. Brown)
totes
|
fe a pe *) POS on anon
Fiu.aéy. Small colony houses at Connecticut Agricultural College. (Photegraph
from the college)
Fic. 170. Two-compartment house for Fic.171. Same style as Fig. 170. Dif-
two indoor brooders at the Maine ferent construction. (Photographs from
Experiment Station the station)
COOPS FOR INDOOR BROODERS AND GROWING CHICKS
132
Pig. 172. Coop with window in door kiG.173. Coop with chick duor
Vic. 174. Convertible front; either Pi, 17
75. With Dutch doors. (Photo-
open or closed gr
aph from J.C. Pattison)
Fic. 176. Upper part of front open Fi1c.177. Wide spaces between boards
(Photograph from Departmentof Agri- on front and one side. (Photograph
culture, Victoria, British Columbia) from Rhode Island Agricultural College)
COOPS FOR INDOOR BROODERS AND GROWING CHICKS
133
FiG.178. Piano-box house used by Fic. 179. House mostly of piano-box
7 y 79 FOE
P.R. Park for small pen of breeding boards; made in an emergency;
stock in summer always satisfactory
Fic. 180. Open-front house at North = Fie. 181. Open front with hood. (Pho-
Carolina Agricultural College. (Photo. — tograph from Department of Agricul-
graph from the colleye) ture, Victoria, British Columbia)
Fic. 182. English portable colony Fic. 183. Rear of Fig. 182. (Photo-
house on wheels graphs from E. T. Brown)
SMALL HOUSES: STATIONARY AND PORTABLE
134
Fie. 84. Cornell house with open Fic. 185. Same as Fig. id4, half fin-
joints between clapboards made ished. (Photographs from New York
by placing wedges between boards State Agricultural College at Cornell
and studs University)
Ira. 186. Portable house at Macdonald Fra. 87. Colony house used by J. UL.
College. (Photograph from the college) Curtixs, West Norwell, Massachusetts
fee.
Fic. 188. Small house used by author. Fic. 189. Same as Fig. 188, with wider
Battened only on back and rear half door. Better for sunny days, not as
of sides good for storms
SMALL HOUSES: STATIONARY AND PORTABLE
135
Vic. 199. Low colony house on farm of
FLW. C. Almy. Tiverton Four Corners,
Rhode Island
Fic. igi. Full-height house used by
T.W.C. Almy; more window space
in front
FiG. 1y2. Shed-roof colony houses at
Cornell. (Photograph from Cornell
Department of Poultry Husbandry)
Kear of shed-roof houses
used by FP. W.C. Almy. showing small
ventilating opening in rear wall
Fic. 13.
Fic. 194. Full-height colony house
used at Macdonald College. (Photo-
graph from the college)
COLONY
POULTRY
Fic. 195. Full-height colony house on
round (pole) sills. (Photograph from
J. C. Pattison)
HOUSES
136
ag] ggg
ic. 190, Llouse for breeding stock at Maine Agricultural College. Raised walk
in front. (Vhotograph from the college)
Vic. 197, Cotton-cloth-front house at Provincial Poultry Breeding: Station,
Edmonton, Alberta. (Photograph from the station)
Fic. 198. Interior of Fig. 197, showing nests and roost
CLOTH-FRONT POULTRY HOUSES IN NORTHERLY LATITUDES
137
Fic. 201. Winter arrangement of colony houses
SMALL COLONY HOUSES AT MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE
(Photographs from the college)
138
8x10"
;
eta |
t
o
|
Y
|
<—— ———_ 124” —__
Fic. 202. Front elevation of small colony house on opposite page
— h-2' 4° MUSLIN | | eas
eed] | IEEH EF 7
1 '
he 24° —
Fic. 204. Front elevation of farmer’s large colony house (Fig. 207)
PLANS OF COLONY HOUSES AT MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE
139
Zz ic ra H E } i H H Hl F
1) ie a ae ee ei noasTs
| Fi
Ly DROPPING BOARD
: <—— 14° -
nS by +
F ~
a
23
rai a
fae)
fay
mm al
i rs Es _——_fi eo
Fic. 205. Ground plan
38" |
t+
i 8)
|
!
14! —— ——>
Fic. 206. Cross section
‘
GROUND PLAN AND CROSS SECTION OF FARMER’S COLONY HOUSE
IN FIG. 207
(Drawings for Figs. 202-207 from Michigan Agricultural College)
140
Fic. 207. Farmer's cvlony house at Michigan Agriculiural College. (Photograph
fram the colleges
Lic. zod. Front view of house, open — FiG.2cg. Kear of Fig. 205. Basement
both front and rear, at West Virginia scratching shed. (Photographs from
Uxperiment Station the station)
Fic. 210. Cloth-front colony brooder houses at Provincial Poultry Breeding
Station, Edmonton, Alberta. (Photograph from the station)
LATE STYLES OF POULTRY HOUSES
141
1¢ It H
zeal pales
H f
' |
wri at |
a! af
Be to
ei =.
L-- 4} Bip -- ..
5 z Bs
a! a rt
i} ar
Wea oem
T
1
L
T
L
'
i
L
o
28"
Fic. 211. Ground plan
8x10"
Fic. 212. Front elevation
7 8
pee o't a| Glass 12. é
"3" center L-. en tad “|
L2x3 2x5 Door
Door
a Wire 4 5-2 =
gt ] Aes ge 22] Wire wt
. .—2:- 6 re
4'x 4" i fal ™ Lrest =
i 8x 12" A ‘
ast 14——
i)
Fic. 213. Front frame
;
_\\
\
Fic. 214. Rear elevation
TWO-PEN HOUSE— DESIGNED BY D. J. LAMBERT
(Drawings from Rhode Island Agricultural College)
142
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY
|
Fic. 215. Side elevation of house on
page 142
Fic. 216. Cloth-curtain-front house de-
signed by D. J. Lambert. (Photograph
and drawings from Rhode Island Agri-
cultural College)
HTT TET TTT TTT 1
143
Description of house, Figs. 211-215.
This house is designed for 100 hens
in two flocks of 50 each. In winter
the flocks may be increased to 60.
The designer’s object was to bring the
roosts together at the middle of the
house, use drop curtains in front of
the roosts and so keep the birds warm
at night, while the large open spaces
in the front gave thorough ventilation
of the interior apart from the roosting
closets. As the reader will note, the de-
sign is an adaptation of the scratching-
shed plan. In practice it was found
that the use of curtains in front of the
roosts was unnecessary — that the con-
ditions and results were better without
them. This is the usual experience
when such direct comparisons are
made. Mr. Lambert’s house stands
far from other buildings in a rocky
pasture, and the flocks in it are given
range on alternate days or half days
as convenient. In most situations it
would be better to have two large
yards, or divide the pasture.
Fic. 217. Isometric projection of Fig. 216. East end and rear
41¢
* a ’
5
S 4.3L %8 SOpUrAL OPS ‘
th € —
u =H t “II a |
aN pag Ol -%
Cn) wP%G eS
Piel
” a
LJ a
4 3
2 H
Lecest oy
jo . ge
oO
L ae oe Laced
: 4 fal ea
a 3
a 1]
H L-=,--48 L
a
A = 13
L.4|4
ao
x Joo opus LU
————
I TI ii O ial —t
H. fee Dall errr
Ss i |
A nN
a a
b--22=4 H
> te I ivi II I It 1
218. Ground plan of Fig. 216
Fic.
\
nter
ide
i SI
Hen th
from re:
Hemlock base
9,
Chestnut Post
(Round )
Fic. 219. Isometric projection of Fig. 216. West end and front
T44
Fic, 220. Long house for breeding and exhibition stock at Wisconsin Agri-
cultural Vollege. (Photograph from the college)
Ee
i
i
H
i
H
Pic. 221. Louse for breedine and exhibition stock at lowa Agricultural College
(Photograph from the college;
Fic. 222. Three sections of front of 200-ft. house at Pittsfield Poultry Farm
(Photograph from Pittsfield Farm)
LONG POULTRY HOUSES
145
Fic. 223. Commercial laying house at Michigan Agricultural College
b< 18° a
EL H a <I i 7
[] : ;
—t_/6" —seosrs —
I] i=
UI prorrinc BoarD U arg
t
au
1 bs
4
!
Berl
< 2 Le
Luis ve
x | @ a
s
s oO
a 7 LI
wl
crs ca
eal
1
\
\
\
\
mY
MUSLIN WINDOW 3 B |
Fic. 224. Ground plan of Fig. 223, showing portion of roosts, nests,
and feed box
146
tert
7
1
ec EO — —>
T
t —5— — |
"MUSLIN : 2
WINDOW ul i) |
} {
z J } | ~
x{10" l N
|
|
l
18°
Fic. 226. Cross section of Fig. 223. (Photograph and drawings from Michigan
Agricultural College)
147
Fic. 229. The house closed in and covered
STAGES IN CONSTRUCTION OF A LONG POULTRY HOUSE
(Photographs from Massachusetts Agricultural College)
148
Pia. ago. Fattening and killing house at Macdonald College. (Photograph from
the college)
biG. 231, Fattening and killing house at Maine Agricultural College. (Photo-
graph from the college)
Fic. 232. Brooder house at Connecticut Agricultural College. (Photograph
from the college)
FATTENING AND KILLING HOUSES AND BROODER HOUSE
149
fic. 233. Small fattening houses at lowa Agricultural College. Note thorough
ventilation
Fic. 234. Interior of a house in Fig. 233. (Photographs from Iowa Agricultural
College)
SPECIAL FATTENING HOUSES
150
Fic. 236. Brooder house with narrow walk in middle and pens on both sides
(Photograph from Pittsfield Farm)
LONG BROODER-HOUSE INTERIORS
151
Fic. 237. Long broodcr house
Fic. 239. Rear of Fig. 238
BROODER HOUSES ON PLANT OF E. 0. DAMON, HANOVER
MASSACHUSETTS
152
COOPS AND BUILDINGS FOR POULTRY 153
Cockerel house. Figs. 240-243 show the exterior and parts of the interior of
the large cockerel house at Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts.
The house has an alley through the middle with small pens on the ground in
front of the walk and two rows of coops for single birds at the other side of the
walk. It has a monitor-top roof to give light to the coops back of the walk and
for better ventilation. The pens in front of the walk connect with the outside
yards. A house of this kind is almost indispensable on a plant which sells many
| Hi
|
4, baa ce
Fic. 240. Exterior view showing yards. (Photograph from Grove IIJill Poultry
Yards)
Fic. 241. Water pan Fic. 242. Passage Fic. 243. Front of coop
high-class breeding and exhibition fowls. The floor pens may be used in the
breeding season for small matings. The only fault found in this house after
years of use is that the lower coops in the rear of the walk are not sufficiently
lighted. This could be corrected by making the passage wider (either by
increasing the width of the house or decreasing the width of the pens),
or by reducing the pitch of the front roof and enlarging the windows in
the wall above it, or by slight changes in all these respects. Some cockerel
houses have at one end or in the center a room the width of the building, to
which the birds are taken for washing and special fitting.
154 POULTRY CULTURE
Poultry houses on hillsides. While a slight slope is an ‘advantage in a site for
a poultry house, too much slope is troublesome. Fig. 244 shows a poultry house
on a steep slope, with a high front wall and the area on which the building
Fic. 244. House on side Fic. 245. Mouse on side Fic. 246. Two-story house
hill; yards in front hill; yards in rear on side hill
stands filled in. The walk in this house is inside, at the rear. Fig. 245 shows
a similar plan of leveling the floor, but with raised walk outside in front.
Fig. 246 shows how an experienced poultryman planned his hillside house to
make a two-story poultry house and give the fowls on both floors direct access
to the ground outside.
CHAPTER X
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS
In discussing poultry houses the position of the roosts was con-
sidered with reference to ventilation and the comfort of the birds ;
the availability of the earth floor for dusting was mentioned, and
a few other like points came up incidentally. With such exceptions
the treatment of coops and buildings for poultry considered only
the structure as a shell, —a shelter from the elements for the birds
and for the apparatus that it houses. In this chapter the various
fixtures, apparatus, and appliances used by poultry keepers are con-
sidered with reference to their adjustments to the birds and to their
adaptation to methods of work. Special attention is given to those
things which poultry keepers may construct for themselves.! In
general, simple appliances of home make are as good as any and
are much less expensive than most articles sold for the same
purpose. Usually it is advisable to buy such elaborate appliances
as incubators and brooders, though persons with special aptitude
for and skill in such work often make their own in whole or in
1In every kind of article that poultrymen use, and for every operation that
they have to perform, special apparatus, utensils, tools, etc. are offered for sale.
Many of these have been patented. In many other cases designers who regard
themselves as inventors sell copyrighted drawings and instructions for making
apparatus, appliances, and houses, with “ permits” to the purchaser to manu-
facture for his own use. Very few patents on this class of articles hold when
contested. Even in incubators and brooders a good feature introduced by one
manufacturer is immediately imitated with impunity by as many other manu-
facturers as can see advantage to themselves in using it. Copyrights on plans
and instructions cover only their exact contents and protect the publisher only
from the use of his work by other publishers. The “ permits” given with them
have no force. Any one into whose hands such instructions come may use the
designs as they are, or with such modifications as he chooses. None of the de-
vices exploited in this way, however, is of such exclusive merit that it is worth
while to consider it in preference to others in which no one claims proprietary
rights. Good designs for all kinds of articles of this class may be found in
experiment-station bulletins and in the poultry and agricultural press. As a rule,
the simplest contrivance that will answer any purpose is the most economical
and, all things considered, the most satisfactory.
155
156 POULTRY CULTURE
part. Especially is this true of brooders. Some manufacturers
make a specialty of supplying lamps and other brooder parts to
those who build their own brooders.
Roosts. Perches are required for all kinds of poultry but water-
fowl and ostriches. Some breeders of heavy Asiatic fowls dispense
with roosts and bed their fowls
on the floor, but this practice is
not to be commended. It came
into use as a result of the devel-
opment of a type of fowl lacking
in vitality and in strength pro-
portionate to its size and weight,
and unable to fly even to a low
roost or to balance itself on it.
Fic: 247. Interior ei compartment ‘Not only i it the natural habit
house. (Photograph from Henry
‘sa Dvesee| of fowls, turkeys, etc. to roost
at a distance from the ground,
but their conformation and feathering are such that if their
droppings are at all soft, the feathers below the vent become very
badly soiled by voidings made when the birds are sitting on the
ground or ona floor, while if the birds were on a perch, the soiling
would be slight. Waterfowl which make voidings that are nor-
mally semifluid are so formed
that the feathers are soiled little
if at all by the passage of the
excrement.
The amount of roost room
required depends on the size of
the birds. An allowance of 7
inches for each adult Leghorn,
9 inches for a Plymouth Rock,
Io inches for a Brahma or a
Cochin, and similar allowances
for birds corresponding to these in size gives ample room. Fowls
of these classes sitting close on the roost do not occupy so much
space as this. The extra allowance of room gives abundant space
for the birds to get up and down without crowding or knocking
one another from the roost.
Fic. 248. Roosts and roost platform
in long house without partitions
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 157
Material and form. Roosts are usually made of 2 x 3 or 2 x 4
inch scantling placed with a wide surface up. Occasionally roosts
are used with the upper surface as narrow as two inches. The
upper surface is sometimes rounded, the idea being to give it the
conformation of the branch of a tree. There is no discernible ad-
vantage to the birds in this. The chief gain in smoothing the
scantling used for roosts is that rough places in undressed lumber
afford resting places for red mites, and planing removes these. The
advantage of this, however, is not as great as it appears ; for if the
mites are present, it is much easier to destroy them on the roosts
than about their supports and in adjoining crevices.
Supports, When no droppings boards are used, roosts are usually
cut the exact length of the space that they occupy, and supported
at the ends by strips screwed or nailed to the wall. Roosts without
droppings boards are placed from 18 inches to 3 feet from the
floor (usually from 2 to 2} feet) and all on the same level. Except
for the very light breeds it is not advisable to place them higher,
even if the height of the house admits of doing so. For guineas,
pheasants, turkeys, and peafowl kept under cover, the roosts may
be placed higher. All of these birds prefer the open, but some
suppose that they are better satisfied indoors when roosts are 4
or 5 feet from the floor. In fixing the height of the roost from
the floor the effect on the bird of jumping or falling from the roost
needs consideration rather than the ability of the bird to fly up to
it. Very few birds are injured by their own efforts to fly to a roost
too high for them. Many are injured, and all are liable to injury,
from jumping from roosts, or falling from them when crowded off
1 The theory of the advocates of narrow roosts is that the narrow roost fits the
foot of the bird better than the wide one, and allows the claws to grasp the roost,
as is natural when the bird sits ona perch. This adaptation of the perch to the
foot is plainly more characteristic of birds of the air than of land birds. Water-
‘fowl, with few exceptions, do not perch. It cannot be observed that domestic
birds which perch prefer narrow to wide, or rounded to flat, perches, or that there
is any disadvantage in the use of wide roosts. On the contrary, young land birds
usually begin to roost on perches relatively wider than the widest ever used for
adult fowls. If fowls are slow about beginning to roost, one of the common
methods of teaching them is to put a wide board (a platform for them) a few
inches above the floor and close to the wall, and, when they have accustomed
themselves to sleep on this, to substitute first a roost six or eight inches wide,
and then one of regulation width.
158 POULTRY CULTURE
by their companions. For roosts of scantling, as described above,
up to 8 feet long, no intermediate supports are needed. For
longer roosts supports at intervals of 5 to 8 feet, according to
the length of the roost, must be provided. The intermediate support
is usually a strip of furring placed under the roosts and at right
angles to them, with one end attached to the wall back of them and
the other to a similar strip or a wire suspended from the roof. By
attaching the support to the wall and roof the floor space is kept
clear. When droppings boards are used below short roosts, the
roost may be supported independently. When long roosts have
Fic. 249. Interior of compartment in long house of Maine Experiment Station
(Photograph from the station)
droppings boards under them, intermediate supports (and some-
times all supports) may rest on the droppings boards. Various styles
of support are used, some of wood, others of iron. As these supports
interfere more or less with the work of removing the droppings,
many poultry keepers prefer to attach intermediate roost supports
to wall and roof, as when no droppings boards are used.
Droppings boards. Droppings boards seem to have been adopted
first for the easy collection of hen manure free from other matter,
at a time when it could be profitably sold to tanneries. The drop-
pings board is a platform under the roosts, of such width that all
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 159
droppings voided while the fowls are at roost fall on it. It is some-
times built into the house and sometimes rests on strips nailed to
the wall at each end; more rarely the droppings board, with roosts
attached, rests on legs like a bench or table. The platform is
raised far enough above the floor to let the fowls get under it.
The space between the platform and the roosts is about eight or
ten inches. At one time the droppings board was considered in-
dispensable in a properly kept poultry house. It was not used by
the farmers who developed the colony system in Rhode Island,
and it was rarely used, as intended, by commercial poultry keepers
whose business was on a paying basis. Unless it is kept clean by
removal of the droppings every two or three days, conditions in
the poultry house are likely to be much better without it. On the
whole, only about half the droppings are kept off the floor by its
use. When kept clean, droppings boards add enormously to the
work of caring for poultry,! without contributing any measurable
benefit.
Roosting closets. As the roosts are usually placed, the space
that they occupy may be partitioned from the rest of the room
with very little expense. If they extend along one side, from wall
to wall, a partition of boards brought part way down, with a drop
curtain the rest of the way when desired, gives the same condi-
tions as if the fowls were in a house similarly arranged and shel-
tered. When droppings boards are used, the roosting space, if
inclosed, gives relatively more crowded conditions. If the roosts
extend but part of the length of a side of the house, a roosting
closet may be made by boarding up one or both ends of the
roosting space and making the front of boards, or boards and
curtain. This closet arrangement may be a decided advantage for
a few birds kept in a large room, or for tender birds, or in extreme
cold weather. It should, however, be used with care. Except in
extreme cold snaps, hardy fowls in a well-stocked house will usually
1 One winter, before littering the floors of the open houses that I use, I took
the droppings from the floors under the roosts for a number of days, to get the
average time required to remove the droppings daily. Then the floors were littered
with leaves, and the droppings were removed from the floor under the roosts only
when they gave an odor, —three times in the course of the winter. The actual
time taken was three hours and a half; the time required to remove the drop-
pings daily for the same period was thirty-four hours.
160 POULTRY CULTURE
do as well if their roosting space is open and provided with cur-
tains for emergency use.
Nests. Boxes and other receptacles which serve the purpose
are used to keep eggs safe and clean. The birds often prefer to
lay in a corner on the floor, and some will persist in doing this
though as attractive a nest as the keeper can design is placed
where they had made their nest. Ducks are most indifferent about
the matter of nests, dropping their eggs anywhere. Most hens go
readily to the nests provided for them, and though they may have
a choice among several nests, will take the next nest if the chosen
nest is occupied and they cannot dislodge the occupant. In the
other kinds of poultry the gen-
eral habit is for each female to
make or choose her own nest
and keep others from it. These
birds, asa rule, seek out secluded
spots in which to lay, and often
go to a distance from the home-
stead. Even when at liberty,
hens usually lay in the house
that they roost in, if suitable pro-
vision is made for them, or if
Fic. 250. Skeleton triple nest box they can find a place there that
suits them.
Dealing with each kind according to habit, the poultry keeper can
consider his own convenience and requirements in making and
placing nests for hens and, in less degree, for ducks, while with
other birds he succeeds best if he gives the nests such protection as
he can where the birds make them, or places boxes, barrels, or
coops singly where they may attract a bird about to lay. The nests
for ducks are usually made on the floor in the corners or at the
sides of the pen by inclosing a space, or spaces, of suitable size,
with a low strip in front and higher divisions between the nests.
Nest boxes for fowls are made in great variety. The minimum
requirement for a single nest is a frame about 12 inches square and
from 12 to 14 inches high, open on one side, except for a strip
about 4 inches wide at the bottom, with or without top and bottom.
If the nest is to be placed on the ground, it does not need a bottom
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 161
and may be used without a top. If it is to be attached to the wall
or placed under the droppings board, it needs a bottom but may be
used with or without a top. Such
a nest as this, sometimes slightly
modified in form, or enlarged for
very large hens, is the common
unit in series of nests for both
laying and sitting hens, and is
the basis of most trap nests, the
trap adjustments being attached
to it directly or to an extension
of it adapted to them. Wherever
more than one nest is needed
in a pen, the ordinary nests are
usually made double, triple, or
quadruple, — rarely more than four in a section, because of the
increased difficulty of handling them. All nests should be mov-
able. It is a serious mistake to build them into the house so
that they are difficult to clean and treat for lice, and cannot be
taken out and aired.
The position of nests in the house may
be decided according to other fixtures and
the general plan, or according to the con-
venience of the keeper or the inclinations
and habits of the hens in the flock, — points
which it is sometimes necessary to consider,
as when hens contract the vice of egg eat-
ing. Nests for laying hens are rarely placed
on the floor (except when hens persist in
laying their eggs there), because in this
position they reduce available floor space ;
Fic. 251. Nests under roost platform,
entered from front
Fic. 252. Nests under
roost platform, entered
from the rear. Long sec. but when tiers of nests are used, they must
tional nest box on cas- begin at the floor, in order to get in the de-
ters, drawn out to collect
sired number of nests and have the higher
the eggs
tiers accessible. They may be attached
to the wall and fully exposed to the light, or arranged to face the
wall (making a partially dark nest), or placed under the droppings
board with entrance from the rear and with a hinged cover in front,
162 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 253. Nest with side and top removed
(trap open)
Fic. 234. Nest with side and top removed
(trap closed)
Fic. 255. View of nest from top (top removed)
THE MAINE EXPERIMENT STATION
TRAP NEST
(Photographs from Maine Experiment Station)
which simple arrange-
ment admits of using
the same nests (with
front closed) as dark
nests and (with front
open) as light nests.
Material. Most nest
boxes are constructed
of wood. Many poultry
keepers convertsecond-
hand boxes and crates
of suitable size into
nest boxes, or make
them of old material
which can be cut to the
required dimensions.
When such close econ-
omy is necessary, this
is not objectionable,
but on the whole it
will be found more
satisfactory if all nests
used for one purpose
and for birds of the
same kind are of the
same pattern, — of
newseven-eighths-inch
boards, surfaced on
both sides and planed
on the edges, to give
smooth surfaces every-
where and close-fitting
joints.
Trap nests are used
to enable the poultry
keeper to keep indi-
vidual laying records
and the full pedigrees
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 163
of stock, without penning separately each hen under observation.
In general their use is limited to experimental work, in which they
are indispensable, and to special breeding operations. They cannot
be used to advantage when attendants are not at hand to release
the hens at frequent intervals during the day, nor is it practicable
to use them for ordinary laying and breeding stock.
Fic. 2562. Cornell trap nests, under Fic. 2564. Cornell trap nests, attached
roost platform?! to wall
There are scores of different kinds of trap nests made. In all
the entrance is so constructed that as the hen enters she springs
the catch which holds the door open, and it closes after her in sucha
manner that she cannot leave the nest until released by an attendant.
Some of these nests are very simple in construction ; others are more
complicated. Each designer claims greater
accuracy for his nest than is found in others,
but in their ordinary use absolute accuraey
is not a vital point. In general, accuracy
depends somewhat on the trap being kept
clear of obstructions, the nesting material
being the chief cause of trouble. Hie. acy. Carch used Gn
Number of nests required. Of common Cornell trap nest
nests one for every four to six hens is usually
sufficient. When trap nests are used, these proportions will be satis-
factory if the hens are removed from the nests at frequent intervals.
Feed troughs. Troughs are used principally for wet (or moist)
_mashes, but also occasionally for dry ground grains when fed in
limited quantities. The pattern most used is a flat-bottomed, shallow
trough. V-shaped troughs are also common. These plain troughs
1 Photographs from New York State Agricultural College at Cornell University.
164 POULTRY CULTURE
cost very little and are, on the whole, more satisfactory than the
more elaborate ones designed to make it impossible for the birds to
get their feet into the food. The flat troughs are made with bottoms
of t-inch or 3-inch boards (surfaced on one side) and with sides
of furring or lath, according to the size of the trough and of the
birds whieh are to feed from it. For sizes up to 6 inches wide and
about 2 feet long, $-inch stuff with edges of lath will do. For larger
troughs it is better to use J-inch bottoms, though if they are for young
birds, the sides may be of lath. A favorite style of flat-bottomed
trough is made by nailing the sides to the bottom so that they pro-
ject equally on both sides of the board, making a reversible trough.
Fic. 259. Same as Fig. 258, one
Fic. 258. Trap nest used at North
Carolina Experiment Station (one nest drawn out and opened at top
trap set)! to remove egg!
The advantage of this is that, by simply turning it over, the trough
is emptied of the litter or dirt which accumulates in it between
feedings, while a single trough must be turned over and back.
Very small V-shaped troughs may be made of 3-inch boards, but
in general it is better to make them of 4-inch stuff. For very large
troughs, used in goose fattening, this form is usually preferred.
For regular feeding, most poultry keepers prefer short troughs
from 3 to 4 feet long and from 6 to 8 inches wide. A short, wide
trough will accommodate more birds than a narrower and longer
one with the same superficial area, and it is easier to feed in
them (with birds crowding about) without scattering food on the
ground.” A trough 12 inches wide by 16 or 18 inches long makes
1 Photographs from North Carolina Experiment Station.
2 This is an important point when the feed trough stands on the poultry-house
floor or on bare or soiled ground. On clean sod no troughs are needed for moist
mash; it may be fed on the ground. Some colony poultry farmers throw the
mash from the wagon with a shovel as they drive from house to house.
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 165
a very convenient size for use in small flocks. One such trough
should be allowed for each eight to twelve hens or ducks. On some
of the duck farms, where feeding and watering is done in the yards,
from a track, the troughs are made 18 to 20 inches wide and 5 or
6 feet long, and the feed is thrown into them from the car. When
hopper feeding was less general, many poultrymen made troughs
with high ends and a board on edge between, to prevent birds
getting into the trough. For very small chicks some poultry
keepers use shallow pans of galvanized iron, about 3 inches wide
and 8 inches long, with sides }-inch high.
Feed hoppers. Many styles of hoppers have been designed, to
hold a store of food and feed it down into an attached box as fast
as the birds consume it. They are made in
all sizes, from the small hopper, with a
capacity of a few quarts, to the large hopper,
with a capacity of one hundred pounds or
more. They are used for both whole and
cracked grains, and for dry ground feeds.
Small hoppers are also used for shell, char-
coal, etc. The movement of the grain from
the hopper to the feéding box beneath is
designed to be automatic, the weight of the
material in the hopper carrying it down
through the opening at the bottom as food
is removed from the box. Most hoppers
work well except for ground grains, which always clog more or
less. To overcome this a patent feeder holds all food in the
food box, with a coarse wire screen so suspended that it rests
on the ground grain, holding it piled high in the box, opening
a larger surface to the birds, and making the food accessible
as long as any remains. The other point of trouble in hopper
feeders is the waste, through the birds pulling stuff out of the
box. To overcome this an inturned edge, or lip, is put on the
feeding box.
The prevention of waste from hopper feeders is not, however,
simply a question of preventing the birds from scattering the con-
tents of the box. The primary question is the quality of the food.
There is nothing gained by retaining in the box the stuff that the
Fic. 260. Feed hopper in
colony house
166 POULTRY CULTURE
birds reject. Hopper feeders are usually made of wood, but many
of the smaller sizes manufactured for sale are of galvanized iron.
Drinking vessels. There are two kinds of drinking vessels: oper
vessels (as pails, pots, pans, and troughs) and c/osed vessels, of the
fountain type. The open vessels are more generally used. If
placed where they get the sun and air, six-quart wooden pails are
very satisfactory for adult fowls. For indoor use when the sun
shines on the drinking vessel for only a short time each day, it is
better to use vessels of stoneware, or iron vessels with porcelain
lining. The latter cost most, but in ordinary use are almost in-
destructible, will last a lifetime, and are the easiest of all to keep
clean. For young chickens and ducklings
with hens, any shallow dish or pan will
answer. Earthen flowerpot saucers are
inexpensive and, if not exposed to frost
when wet, will last many seasons. For
ducks and the larger kinds of poultry,
full-sized wooden pails or small tubs or
troughs are used. For ducks and geese
that are given water only for drinking pur-
poses, the drinking vessel should be too
heavy to be easily upset, or should be se-
cured. On the whole, V-shaped troughs
are as satisfactory as any for waterfowl.
Drinking fountains are made on the same principle as hopper
feeders, and are mostly commercial products. The primitive form
is the homemade fountain, made of a tall tin can inverted in a
shallow pan or dish of slightly greater circumference, the can hav-
ing a few small holes at such distance from the open end as is
required to make the water stand at the desired height in the other
vessel. The commercial drinking fountains are made of earthen-
ware, stoneware, galvanized iron, or glass. The advantage of using
drinking vessels of the fountain type depends very much on cir-
cumstances. In general, open vessels are preferred, because they
are more quickly filled and easier to keep clean. The extra labor
of taking care of a large number of drinking fountains will usually
more than offset what is gained in reducing the number of water-
ings. The best way for the individual poultry keeper to decide
Fic. 261. Water pails on
shelves
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 167
points of this kind is to try out a special appliance on a small
scale and in comparison with the best arrangement that he can
make without it.
Dusting boxes. Dust baths are required when poultry are con-
fined on floors of wood or cement. They may be built into one
corner, in which case all that is necessary to make the dusting place
Fic. 262. Fully equipped feed, store, and conditioning house. (Photograph
from Gardner and Dunning)
is two boards for the two outer sides, the walls forming the other
sides and the floor the bottom. This is probably the best arrange-
ment in small pens. In large pens it may be more satisfactory to
use movable boxes (about thirty inches square and twelve inches
high) with bottoms, and place two or more in each pen.
Common tools. In the work of caring for poultry houses and
yards the ordinary garden and stable tools (rakes, hoes, shovels,
spades, forks, brooms, wheelbarrows, pails, scoops, etc.) all have
168 POULTRY CULTURE
their places, the kind and size used being adapted to the work to
be done. In the mixing and cooking of feed, also, appliances
used in work with other kinds of stock are adapted to work with
poultry. There are, however, a number of appliances and tools de-
signed especially for the poultryman. Some of these are necessary
in all lines of work, some in special lines, and some are useful only
in certain conditions. It is not necessary to mention and describe
them all. Following is a list of the more important appliances, with
brief statements concerning the use of each. These and other
appliances are catalogued by general poultry-supply houses, or
advertised in poultry and agricultural papers by the manufacturers.
Fic. 263. Iron jacket and bricked-up Fic. 264. Feed cooker and mixing
kettles in cookhouse on farm of trough in cookroom at C.H. Wyckoff’s
F. W. C. Almy plant
Cooking apparatus. The best cooker for poultry feed is a bricked-
up set-kettle. The bricks hold the heat much longer than the iron
fire box under the ordinary feed cooker. The latter is less expen-
sive. Either may be used for scalding poultry or for heating water
for any purpose. Something of this kind is necessary on a poultry
plant that carries more than a few dozen birds.
Food mixers. On a large plant where moist mashes are fed
(as on duck plants and goose-fattening farms) mixing by hand
becomes heavy work. Bakers’ dough mixers have been satisfac-
torily used by some duck growers. One large duck farm uses a con-
crete mixer. Ordinarily a revolving barrel or box turned by hand
will answer for mixing dry mill stuffs, and wet ground grains may
be mixed with a shovel in kettles or in troughs. Grains to be fed
in hoppers may be mixed in revolving mixers. For feeding by hand,
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS 169
grains may be sufficiently mixed by scooping alternately from the
different bins to the pail in which the food is carried.
Bone cutters. The only machine that will reduce fresh bone to
form suitable for poultry food is a bone cztter, which shaves the
bone; green bone cannot be ground. The old-style bone mill for dry
bones is now rarely seen. In general, it does not pay to use a bone
cutter unless it can be run by power. When power can be secured,
the most common difficulty is to get regular and sufficient supplies
of bone at reasonable prices, for the supply is usually very limited.
Fic. 265. Homemade feed mixer, Fic. 266. Same as Fig. 265. Hopper
used by Henry D. Smith hung up after filling barrel
Hay cutters. Every poultryman who has room to grow his
own clover or alfalfa, or can purchase either (properly cured)
from a farmer, should consider a hay cutter a necessity. Most
poultry keepers pay too much for this class of food. One or the
other of the grasses mentioned can be grown anywhere. Enough
for several thousand fowls can be cut by hand power in a
short time.
Root cutters. Root cutters are not often needed. It is usually
much better to feed roots whole or simply split, letting the poultry
pick them to pieces and eat them deliberately.
see —
Bic. 267. Dough cart used by Sisson biG. 268. Dough cart. with coop for
Brothers, Litthe Compton, Rhode — moving poultry. P.H. Wilbour, Little
Island Compton. Rhade Island
Pic. 26). Two-wheeled, covered Fic. 270. andy water cart,
dough cart P. kK. lark
ieee x nce = el
Fic. 271. Feeding and watering cart, Fic. 272. Same as Fig. 271, with box
used by the Department of Poultry sides on. (Photograph from New
Husbandry at Cornell University York State Agricultural College)
CARTS FOR POULTRY WORK
170
POULTRY-HOUSE FITTINGS I7I
Egg testers. For testing the fertility of eggs, incubator manu-
facturers furnish a metal chimney, to be used on the incubator lamp.
While this will serve the purpose, it is not as good as a homemade
tester made from a high, narrow box (a six-pound wooden starch
box will answer the purpose). In one side and at such a height
that it will come directly opposite the flame of the lamp set inside,
cut a hole a little smaller than the oval circumference of an egg;
a hole a little larger in circumference than the top of the lamp
chimney should be cut in the top of the box. The box tester may
also be used with an incandescent electric light, but sunlight is the
best light for testing eggs. Some poultrymen darken the incuba-
tor cellar and test eggs through a suitable aperture in a shutter
on a window facing the sun.
Nest eggs. Artificial eggs are supposed to be of use in induc-
ing hens to lay in the nests containing them, but their value for this
purpose is doubtful. Hens sometimes lay where the nest eggs are;
quite as often they do not. The china or other nest egg is really
serviceable in nests of sitters moved to new quarters, before it
seems safe to give them good eggs.
Transportation on the poultry plant. On a poultry plant of the
extensive type a horse and cart can usually be used for distributing
food and water, collecting eggs, and moving coops from place to
place. The wheelbarrow is indispensable on all plants. On some
duck plants a great deal of labor is saved by using tracks running
above the fences, and in some of the long houses for fowls over-
head tracks are arranged to carry a hanging car from pen to pen.
The advantage of this inside track is not as apparent as that of the
outside track used on the duck farms. Ona large plant a great deal
of time and labor is saved by having food storage bins so distrib-
uted about the plant that the grain does not have to be carried long
distances at each feeding.
CHAPTER XI
NUTRITION OF POULTRY
Nutritive requirements. Poultry need the food constituents used
by all creatures, but not always in the forms and proportions in
which they are used by other domestic creatures. The composi-
tion of the flesh of poultry does not differ greatly from that of
domestic animals used as food. In general it contains more protein
and less fat! The rapid growth of poultry, however, demands a
larger proportion of concentrated food and relatively larger quan-
tities of food than other domestic creatures, and in birds which
lay nearly all the year round the heavy demand for concentrated
food is continuous. For both growth and egg production mineral
matter also is required in much larger proportion than in the diet
of mammals.
Nutritive organs. The digestive organs of poultry present the
same general characteristics as those of mammals, varied in the
different kinds in accordance with their feeding habits and diet.
Briefly, they consist of a mouth, furnished with horny lips (beak,
or bill) ; a gullet; an esophagus, having an enlargement (the crop)
in which the food taken in at the mouth is retained for some time
and subjected to action of the secretions of the crop; a stomach
(the proventriculus), where the food received from the crop is
mixed with the gastric juice; a gizzard, a muscular organ with
corrugated inner surfaces of tough, horny skin between which the
food is reduced before passing into the intestines ; large and small
intestines; liver; gall bladder; pancreas; two caca; rectum;
cloaca; and anus, or vent. In a study of poultry culture special
interest attaches to the mouth, crop, and gizzard, to the func-
tions of these organs, and to their relations to feeding theories
and practice.
1 Poultry as Food,” Farmer,’ Bulletin No. 182, United States Department of
Agriculture, also Awdletin Mo. 270, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station.
172
NUTRITION OF POULTRY 173
In general, poultry use for food larger proportions of expensive
food products than other domesticated creatures, but as, under suit-
able conditions, they collect much of this class of foods for them-
selves, the comparative cost of feeding them is not as much greater
as the fact suggests.
Note. Some analogies between organs of nutrition of birds and creatures
below and above them in the scale of evolution are also of peculiar interest to
the student of poultry culture. The most conspicuous resemblances between
domestic birds and animals in respect to nutrition are commonly noted and
their importance is often exaggerated. Thus: Poultry, being omnivorous, eat
everything eaten by cattle, which are herbivorous and granivorous; there-
fore it has been assumed by some students of the science of feeding that the
nutritive rations worked out for cows will apply to poultry.! There is a
double fallacy in this view. Cattle are principally herbivorous, but use small
quantities of grain to advantage. Fowls are principally granivorous, but eat
considerable quantities of vegetables. Were there no other difference in the
diets of fowls and cattle, the fact that cattle eat chiefly of bulky foods and
lightly of concentrated foods, while fowls subsist more largely (and may sub-
sist for long periods exclusively) on concentrated grain foods, would suggest a
necessary difference in feeding standards. But fowls are also carnivorous and
insectivorous, using large quantities of highly nutritious animal foods. Such
differences suggest that the same feeding standards will not serve for both
classes of creatures.
Cattle and horses have strong jaws and powerful molar teeth for the mas-
tication of the forage and grain that they consume. Hence, by analogy, it
was assumed that birds eating grain must have powerful organs to grind and
reduce it to form available for nutrition. Man and all domestic animals must
reduce food to such consistency and form that it will pass through a gullet
very small in comparison with the mouth and the size of the creature. Again,
by analogy, it was assumed that birds, so much smaller than man and domes-
tic animals, and having no teeth with which to reduce their food before swal-
lowing, must have food especially selected or prepared to meet the supposed
requirements of creatures of their size not provided with mechanical organs
of nutrition such as larger and stronger mammals possessed. Such analogies
have had a marked influence on the theory and practice of poultry feeding.
The fundamental error was failure to assign to birds their proper place in
the animal kingdom, and to consider the resemblances between their nutritive
organs and processes and those of creatures lower down in the scale.
1 Singular and absurd as it seems, it is a fact that the earliest investigators of
the science of feeding poultry, instead of analyzing numbers of good rations for
poultry and ascertaining their average and using that as the standard, simply
took over the standards accepted for dairy cows and tried to apply them in
poultry feeding.
174 POULTRY CULTURE
Birds are most closely akin to reptiles, which differ strikingly from mam-
mals in the structure and use of the organs for the prehension of food and
also in the provision made for its final mastication. A cow may choke on an
apple; a snake by extension of the mouth and dilation of the gullet will
swallow animals which, even after constriction in its folds, have a circumfer-
ence greater than the normal circumference of its body. In this respect birds
occupy an intermediate position. A bird can usually swallow anything that it
can get into its mouth. In the young of aérial birds the mouth is conspic-
uously large. A small chicken will swallow an insect apparently much too large
for it; fowls often kill mice and frequently swallow young mice alive; + a goose
will swallow a large apple core. No one who closely observes the feeding
habits of poultry which have access to foods of various kinds, in pieces much
larger than they can conveniently swallow, can fail to notice that, even when
the bird has to pick the article to pieces to eat it, the last piece swallowed is
always much larger than is commonly considered an appropriate size for mor-
sels of its food. It has been usual to attribute this to gluttony and to the fear
of having a choice morsel snatched away, but it is simply the natural habit
of the bird to swallow the largest morsel adapted to its structure.
The crop of the bird corresponds to the rumen, or paunch, in ruminant
quadrupeds, but in the provision for reducing food, after subjection to the
action of the secretions of the crop and proventriculus, a bird resembles the
orders below it in the scale of development. The food of the bird is masti-
cated, or triturated, in the gizzard. Reasoning from analogies observed between
birds and ruminants, and from the fact that small particles of stone, glass,
earthenware, etc. were often found in the gizzards of fowls in course of prep-
aration for the table, it was long ago assumed that the gizzard itself was inad-
equate for its function, and that the bird swallowed these substances because
they were required for the mastication of its food. One of the common pre-
cepts of poultry culture is that poultry must be constantly supplied with
“fresh, sharp grit” or it cannot properly digest its food, and the practice of
supplying the birds with the teeth that nature neglected to provide is quite
general.
In respect to the gizzard, as in capacity for swallowing, birds are more like
some reptiles and insects than like the familiar animals with which their nutri-
tive organs are usually compared. The crocodile has an organ resembling a
gizzard, and some naturalists ? have said that, like birds, crocodiles swallowed
stones to aid ‘the gastric mill.” Some insects have gizzards supplied with
tooth-like processes. From these several analogies the reasonable presumption
is that the bird does not require grit to grind its natural food, and that, while
occasional eating of indigestible articles of this kind might be called an error in
selecting food, the regular consumption of such stuffs would indicate unnatural
feeding and an abnormal condition of the digestive tract as a result. This
point will be further considered in a subsequent paragraph.
‘] have seen a very large Brahma hen swallow alive a mouse more than
half grown. 2 James Orton, Comparative Zodlogy.
NUTRITION OF POULTRY 175
Differences in beaks and crops. In the gallinaceous birds the
upper mandible forms a stout, sharp hook, and this beak is a most
efficient tool for the prehension of food and also to supplement
the claws in uncovering food concealed on or near the surface of
the ground. In waterfowl the bill is much larger: in the duck it
is long, broad and flat, shovel-like, and especially adapted to secur-
ing food in water; the bill of the goose is less flattened, stronger,
and the edges of the upper mandible are more serrated. The
serrations of the mandibles in waterfowl seem to serve a double
purpose: they give a firmer hold on the coarse vegetation grow-
ing in water and in moist places, of which these birds eat great
quantities ; they also serve as strainers to retain in the mouth
small forms of animal life taken in with water, which is forced
out at the sides. The crops of gallinaceous birds are large and
will hold considerable quantities of food; the crops of ducks and
geese are small.
Natural foods and feeding habits of poultry. In a study of the
subject of feeding, the natural foods and feeding habits of poultry
must be considered. It is to these natural diets that the organs and
habits of the birds were adjusted in the wild state, and though they
readily adapt themselves to different diets, there are some features
of the natural life and diet which must be preserved in every arti-
ficial method intended for continuous use. The form in which food
is taken is of more importance in feeding practice than the proper
balancing of nutrients in the ration; for while a badly balanced ra-
tion produces malnutrition, its bad effects develop slowly and are
usually promptly remedied by a proper diet, but a ration that is
unsuitable in form (however well balanced in its nutrient elements)
if eaten by the bird reluctantly and in insufficient quantities may
result in malnutrition, or, if eaten readily, may cause disorders of
the digestive organs which develop quickly and are not easily rem-
edied. The form in which food is taken also has an important
influence on exercise and the general physical habits which affect
digestion.
Gallinaceous domestic birds! are conspicuously granivorous
when compared with carnivorous and herbivorous creatures, but
under natural conditions, with opportunity to eat as much as they
’ Fowls, turkeys, guineas, peafowls, and pheasants.
176 POULTRY CULTURE
want of the different kinds of food, it is probable that they derive
about as much of their nourishment from animal and green foods as
from grains and seeds. The form in which they take foods differs
in nearly every case from the form in which it is supplied to them
by a keeper. The grains and seeds that they get in the natural
state are mostly small, and a large proportion of them are at some
stage of germination. Very small grains and seeds are taken only
in the absence of larger ones, but these small seeds, as of grass
and many weeds, are eaten greedily, blade (or leaf), root, and all,
after germination. There are few, if any, of our common plants
and weeds that poultry will not eat in the first tender stage, though
there are many for which they have little appetite when they have
passed beyond that stage. They always prefer tender vegetation,
and it has often been noted that their marked preference for cer-
tain plants was for the condition, not for the kind. The animal
food secured under natural conditions consists principally of small
creatures (insects, worms, etc.) eaten whole, bony and fibrous
parts being swallowed with the rest. Under these conditions
all poultry undoubtedly consume very much larger quantities of
indigestible material than the poultry keeper usually gives them,
but much of this is in such form that it mechanically assists the
processes of digestion, giving greater bulk to the ration and prevent-
ing the more nutritious parts from massing, or lumping, so that
the organs and secretions do not properly operate on them. The
digestive organs of these birds are adjusted to a mixed diet con-
taining a considerable proportion of indigestible material. Normally
the food, even on good range, is secured only by effort which gives
the bird all the exercise needed to keep it in good condition. The
activities of the birds are manifested in walking and running after
1 Such a point is much more difficult to determine definitely than at first ap-
pears. The birds may eat at one time or season larger quantities of one kind of
food, at another time or season larger quantities of another kind of food, accord-
ing to abundance of supply, temperature, etc. Habit and familiarity with articles
also have a great deal to do with their selection of food, and so observations for
short periods are often of little value. But whoever closely observes the feeding
of a few of these birds on a range where food of all kinds is abundant and they
can select just what they want, cannot fail to be impressed by the attention that
they give to vegetation and insects, and by the difference in the consumption of
grain between a flock on good range and a yarded flock supplied liberally with
the vegetable and animal foods most used for poultry in confinement.
NUTRITION OF POULTRY 177
insects (sometimes with the assistance of the wings) quite as much
as in scratching.
The common waterfowls (ducks and geese) are less alike in diet
than the strictly land birds. Both frequent shallow water and the
margins of streams, and feed largely on the small and minute
forms of animal life found in such waters; but ducks are more
disposed to supplement this with the insects which abound in such
localities, while geese are more attracted to the vegetation in the
water and on the lowlands near by. Neither ducks nor geese care
much for whole grains, and efforts to feed them whole grains in
considerable quantities generally give very unsatisfactory results,
because their nutritive organs are not adapted to dealing with food
elements in that form. Their bills, though excellent for securing
small food in water, are not so well formed to picking up small
grains, and, their natural diet being principally of soft foods which
need not remain long in the crop, that organ is small and not
adapted to a diet of whole or broken grains. Ducks in domestica-
tion are often grown on a diet which consists principally of ground
grains, and may be fed meat much more freely than any of the
other kinds of poultry. Geese thrive best when given good grass
pasture as the basis of their ration, with ground grain to supple-
ment it. Both ducks and geese are gross feeders, eating large
quantities of bulky foods. They take exercise mostly in the water.
The goose moves in a most leisurely manner on land. The duck’s
movements are more rapid for short distances (as when darting
after insects), but if driven out of a slow walk, ducks which cannot
fly break down and flounder about helplessly. Neither ducks nor
geese seem to require much exercise to keep them in condition.
The swan feeds mostly from the surface of the water, living
largely on coarse grasses and weeds. It is said to be very destruc-
tive to fish spawn and young fish.
The ostrich, in diet and feeding habits, has more resemblance to
the goose than to any other kind of poultry. It is a grazing bird
and may be kept on pasture without other foods.
Note. It should be observed that in the natural foods of all kinds of poultry
there is a very large proportion either of fibrous matter or of water serving as a
diluent for the principal nutrient elements ; also, that in a natural diet, with its
great variety of foods of all kinds, not only are the principal food elements
178 POULTRY CULTURE
obtained in a greater variety of forms, but the variety of minor food elements is
much greater, including small quantities of many elements not secured when the
birds eat only such food as man may profitably provide for them. The function
of these minor elements in nutrition is little understood. The fact that our
domestic animals and birds thrive better ona ration which gives them a variety
of those elements or essences characteristic of different organisms that are about
equal in the value of their principal nutrients, suggests that they have functions
of great importance in nutrition, although, in the present state of knowledge of
the subject, they cannot be included in food calculations based on the chemical
constituents of food articles. Again, the fact that certain foods are evidently
better foods for certain animals than other foods almost identical in the pro-
portions of their principal nutrients indicates that the peculiar value of these
foods is either in their form or in the form in which the principal nutrients
appear in them, or in some of the minor elements.
Common poultry foods. In every place those foods (used by man
for himself or his larger domestic animals) which can be fed to
poultry most economically are the poultry foods in general use. In
any section the grain that is most abundant and cheapest is likely
to be the principal food of the poultry of that section. Throughout
the greater part of the United States corn is the principal grain fed
to poultry, but in wheat-growing sections wheat may be cheaper. In
Japan rice is the principal grain fed to poultry. Ay-products of all
kinds of food preparations form an increasingly important part of
the common poultry foods. In a sense the greater part of all food
used by poultry is waste product or by-product. The wheat, oats,
barley, or other grain fed to poultry is usually of inferior grade,
damaged, or, if of choice quality, only temporarily available because
of an oversupply bringing the price to a point where it can be
profitably fed to stock. Even of corn, which is produced in such
enormous quantities, a large proportion of what is sold for stock
feeding is of poor quality. As a result of modern methods of pre-
paring and handling foodstuffs for man, by-products of mills and
packing houses, in great number and quantity, are placed on the
market for stock feeding. The profitable use of these requires some
knowledge of the composition and feeding properties and values
of foods.
Composition of foods. Nutritive elements in foods are proteids,
carbohydrates, fats, and ash (mineral matter). All foodstuffs also
contain fiber and water, the proportions of these varying widely
NUTRITION OF POULTRY 179
according to the kind and condition of the article. Fiber is largely
indigestible. Water is the necessary solvent for food solids. It is
present in sufficient quantities for this purpose only in succulent
vegetables and fruits and in fresh meats. As its function is mechan-
ical, it is not considered in discussing and calculating nutritive
values, but in feeding practice the quantity of water in the food
may have an important bearing on results. Fiber also seems to
have a mechanical function.
Protein is the common name for the nitrogenous substances
which supply material for the structure of the body. The white
(albumin) of an egg is protein, supplying the materials for a fully
developed chick.
Carbohydrates are principally starches and sugars supplying
fuel (for heat and energy) and fat (reserve fuel for the same
purposes).
Fats (as food) are considered highly concentrated carbohydrates.
Minerals in animal nutrition are chiefly calcium and phosphate
compounds. In poultry feeding, lime in available form is of special
importance.
The common grains contain these food elements in such propor-
tions that, so far as actual nutrients are concerned, any of them
will make a good grain ration for poultry sufficiently supplied with
green food and animal food, and so able to balance their own
ration, as they do in the natural state. The differences in the
composition of the whole grains are in some cases considerable,
yet not so great that they cannot be equalized by variation in the
quantities of other foods and by the power of organisms to utilize
an excess of one kind of nutrients to supply a deficiency of an-
other, or to conserve available supplies of another. Thus an excess
of protein is converted into fat and stored in the body, and an
‘excess of carbohydrates or fat, though not convertible into protein,
is also stored up as fat in the body, furnishing a reserve of heat and
energy. The by-products of articles manufactured for human beings
often have nutrient elements in quite different proportions from
the articles of which they are made. Usually the by-product is less
valuable as a food, but in some cases it contains a larger propor-
tion of some valuable element (see descriptions of foodstuffs in
the next chapter).
180 POULTRY CULTURE
Nutrient ratio. The relative proportions of principal elements
in food articles are mathematically expressed in the form of a ratio,
commonly called the nutritive ratio, but more correctly described
as the “nutrient ratio.” To obtain this the percentage of protein
in the article is taken as the first term of the ratio ; the percentage
of carbohydrates and fats (the fats being reduced to terms of car-
bohydrates)* is taken as the second term, and the ratio is reduced
to its simplest form, in which 1 represents the value of the protein.
If the difference in the proportions of the two classes of elements,
as thus expressed numerically, is small, the nutritive ration is said
to have a zarrow ratio; if the difference is great, the ration is said
to have a wede ratio. Rations having a narrow ratio are called
narrow rations, and those having a wide ratio, wede rations; but
these terms are usually employed to describe the relations of ra-
tions compared, not to a standard, but to each other. The chem-
ical values of the nutrients in a food are also expressed in figures
which represent the total heat-producing value of all elements com-
bined; this is called the fuel value or potential energy of the article.
The chemical composition of any food article may be accurately
determined by the chemist, and the nutrient ratio and fuel value
established and expressed. As different samples vary in compo-
sition, standards for general use are made by taking averages of
numbers of analyses of each kind of food. The composition of
ordinary lots of whole foods (as grain, hay, milk, and meat of any
kind) will closely approximate these standards. The variations from
them will not, as a rule, be great enough to materially affect results
in feeding, and those who have occasion to calculate percentages
may assume that a whole-food article which appears to be of
average quality is of average, or standard, chemical composition.
Nature makes no variations in foods so great as to disturb the
nutritive processes of organisms using them.
In by-products nutritive values are less stable and uniform.
Nearly all states now require such products to be sold under a
guaranty of their most valuable nutrients. While this affords the
purchaser protection from those who would unscrupulously pass
1 This is done by multiplying the value of the fats by 2.25 or by 2.27. Author-
ities are not all agreed in regard to the fraction, and it makes no material differ-
ence, for all values in feeding are approximate and relative.
NUTRITION OF POULTRY 181
off an inferior article, it does not always inform him even approxi-
mately of the nutritive value of the article. Many, especially of the
highly concentrated by-products, run very unevenly in composition,
and the manufacturers, to be on the safe side, place their guaranty
below the minimum (see ‘‘ Beef scrap,” Chapter XII). The bulletins
of the various state experiment stations giving analyses of foods of
this class offered for sale in the state afford the most trustworthy
information in regard to their composition.
Neither nutrient ratio nor potential energy gives a generally
applicable standard for accurately measuring nutritive values. Both,
however, are serviceable in comparisons of food values, and com-
parison of either the nutrient ratios or the fuel values of two similar
articles often shows their relative feeding values. Judged by prac-
tical observation, a comparison which considers both may be even
more accurate. It might be so invariably if feeding value depended
solely on the quantities and proportions of the principal elements ;
but, as the description of foods in the following chapter will show,
there is sometimes a very great difference between the feeding
value of two articles as indicated by their chemical constitution and
as demonstrated in practice.
Nutrients vary in digestibility, Creatures differ in digestive
power, and the same creature digests a certain kind of food more
completely at one time than at another. Investigators of the
science of feeding have determined, by careful experiment, ‘‘diges-
tion coefficients” for most of the common food articles for the
larger animals, and in a few instances for poultry ; but, in the case
of poultry especially, the observations are too few and the results
too irregular to warrant the use of these coefficients in a study of
foods and feeding.
Expression of nutritive values. Nutritive standards are com-
monly expressed in terms of nutrient ratio and fuel value. Although,
as has been said, neither of these measures is accurate, they give
the best basis that we have for the comparison of food values in
numerical terms. They are found for each kind or class of animals,
and for each purpose for which the animals are fed, by calculating
the chemical values of rations the actual feeding value of which has
been demonstrated in practice. What was said of the comparison
of values of different food articles on the basis of nutrient ratio
182 POULTRY CULTURE
and fuel value applies as well to comparisons of rations contain-
ing a variety of foods, both with other rations and with single ar-
ticles of food. For this purpose any article or ration may be taken
as the standard with which others are compared ; but it is most
fitting that the ration or article selected be, if a ration, a complete,
well-balanced ration, and if an article, that food article which in
itself is nearest to a complete ration. For a comparative study of
foods and food values it is advisable to use a single article rather
than a ration compounded of a variety of articles differing widely
in physical as well as in chemical properties. Such a single stand-
ard presents to the eye and mind of the feeder a tangible and
simple standard with which to compare all other articles and com-
binations of articles used as food. The use of a standard of this
sort has the added advantage that it compels consideration of the
physical as well as of the chemical properties of foods.
The food article which best meets the requirements for a single
standard food for poultry is wheat.
CHAPTER XII
POULTRY FOODS
The preceding chapter included a brief explanation of the general
properties of foods and their relations to the nutrition of poultry.
It was shown that the food value of an article was not determined
solely by the quantities and proportions of principal nutrients that
it contained, but was affected by physical properties and minor
nutrients. In this chapter articles used for poultry food will be
described as to chemical contents, physical properties, and feeding
values as observed in practice. Wheat, the single food article
which is the nearest to a complete food for poultry, is taken as a
standard of comparison. The statement of the chemical composi-
tion and values of wheat is repeated for direct comparison with
similar data for each group of foods described, and differences and
resemblances which affect feeding practice are mentioned. Only
whole articles and ordinary by-products are described. For de-
scriptions of special brands and mixtures, and of proprietary
articles, the reader is referred to the manufacturers and to the
bulletins of his state experiment station. In making so full a list
of articles which may be used as food for poultry, it was not pos-
sible to secure all statements of chemical analysis from the same
source, and the figures given will not always correspond with
others to which the reader may have access. Such differences are
immaterial and may be disregarded. In the study of food values
mathematically expressed the student should always bear in mind
that the figures represent averages of samples of several or many
grades,
Wheat. Wheat contains the principal nutrients in about the pro-
portions that analyses of ordinary good complete rations of mixed
grains show. Physically, as compared with other grains commonly
used for poultry, a grain of wheat is medium to small in size, and
is smooth, having no hull. Varieties and grades of wheat vary in
183
184 POULTRY CULTURE
TasB_Le I. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF WHEAT AND WHEAT
PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches} Fats |Nutrient| Calories
%, % %, G % %G Ratio | in 102z.
Wheat (plump) . . » | 1.05 | 1.8} 1.8] 11.9 | 71-9 | 2.1 | 1:63] 102
Wheat (shrunken or
screenings) . : . | 11.6 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 12.5 | 65.1 | 3.0 | 1:5.8 97
Low-grade flour . 12.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 75.0 | 1.0 | 1:7.7 | Tor
Wheat middlings! 12.1 | 4.6 | 3.3] 15.6 | 60.4 | 4.0 | 124.7 98
Wheat bran. . . 11.9 | 0.9 | 5.8 | 15-4 | 53-9 | 4.0 | 124.1 90
Mixed feed! 10.6 | 9.7 | 3-6} 12.0 | 59.9 | 4.2 | 1:58 94
Stale bread “ 31.2 6.9 | 44.2 | 0.5 | 1:6.6 61
color, plumpness, and hardness. The harder and darker-colored
wheats are richest in protein and most valuable as poultry foods.
Whole wheat may be fed exclusively to poultry, without apparent
detriment, for a longer period than any other grain. It is preferred
by most kinds of poultry to all other grains except corn.
Wheat screenings. When free from foreign matter, wheat
screenings and shrunken wheat are practically the same, and do
not differ noticeably from plump wheat in feeding value. Screen-
ings are often heavily adulterated with weed seeds, grain hulls, etc.,
and are very generally sold at too high a price, because many
purchasers will take the lowest-priced article of its kind without
considering quality. It is quite usual to find wheat screenings
selling readily at only 10 or 12 per cent below the price of good
wheat, when the value (because of adulterants) may be 15 to 20
per cent, or even more, less than that of the good wheat.
Low-grade flour. Wheat flour not suitable for bread making is
a most valuable ingredient in mashes, both adding to the nutrients
and improving the consistency of mashes made from coarse by-
products. Low-grade flour is also called red-dog flour.
Middlings. Coarse flour and fine bran, in varying proportions in
different lots and in the products of different mills, is called mid-
dlings. In many sections middlings, as a separate article, is rarely
found on the market.
1 The term “shorts” in some sections means mddlings and in others a mix-
ture of bran and middlings. It is sometimes applied indiscriminately to any and
all kinds of wheat offals.
POULTRY FOODS 185
Bran. Bran is the coarser part of ground wheat. Pure bran is
much lower in feeding value than is indicated by its analysis.
Much of the product now sold as bran contains a large propor-
tion of middlings and is also sold under the names “' mixed feed”
and “ shorts.”
Stale bread. The greater part of the stale bread used for poul-
try food is white bread, but often the refuse bread from city
bakeries, hotels, and restaurants contains considerable propor-
tions of other kinds of bread and of cake. All such articles
are valuable foods for poultry and, at the usual prices, are
cheap’ foods.
Note. A comparison of the nutrient ratios and fuel values of these wheat
products with those of whole wheat indicates for them a feeding value closely
approximating that of wheat, but stale bread is the only one of them that in
practice gives the results that the comparison suggests. Though usually fed
only as a part of the ration (in a mash), it has been used for long periods, with
excellent results, as the only grain food for fowls and chicks on range. The
nutrient ratio is nearly the same as that of wheat. The low fuel value indi-
cated is due to the high per cent of water. Low-grade flour, differing little
from wheat in the proportions and values of principal nutrients, can, because
of its form, be fed only in combination with coarser and less glutinous materials.
Middlings and bran both compare very closely with wheat, and good rations
for continuous use may be compounded, having the nutrient proportions and
fuel values of these by-products; yet neither of them alone, nor the two in
combination, will go very far in feeding. The percentage of fiber is high in
both, and especially high in bran. Their chief service in poultry feeding is to
dilute and temper the corn meal, which is the basis of most mashes and which
supplies in cheaper form some of the nutrients in the wheat flour of which
these are by-products.
Corn. In nearly all parts of the United States field corn is the
principal grain used for poultry food. In percentages of nutrients
it does not differ greatly from wheat, except in fats. The grains of
corn are from four to six times as large as grains of wheat. As a
tule, when poultry have access to a variety of whole grains, they
eat the corn first. When cracked corn is mixed with other grains,
this preference is less marked, which suggests that the larger size
of the grain may be the attraction. Yellow and white corn show in
analysis no difference in principal nutrients. In feeding practice
no difference is noted, except that yellow corn gives its color to
the fat of birds fed on it and to the yolks of their eggs. Many
186 POULTRY CULTURE
Tas_e IJ. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF CORN AND CORN
PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches| Fats |Nutrient|Calories
G % % % % % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . ae Se a ro5 | 7.8! 78] 17.9 | 77.9 | 27 | 126.3 | 102
Field corn . 3 10.9 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 10.4 |] 70.3 | 5.0 | 1:7.9] 106
Sweetcorn. oe 88 | 2.8 | 1.9} 11.6 | 668 | Sa | 127.5] 111
Popcorn. . : 10.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 11.2 | 69.2 2 [527.3] 107
Corn meal (unbolted) . . 12.0 | 2.2 | 1.3 8.7 | 7t-r | 4.7 | 119.5 | 104
Corn meal (bolted). . . $2.0 } 1.2 | ho 8.9 | 72.0 | 4.9 | 1:9.5 | 106
Corn meal (granulated) 12.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 9-2 | 74-4 | 1-9 | 1:8.6] 102
Corn and cobmeal. . . | 15.1 | 6.6} 1.5 | 85 | 64.8 | 3.5 ]1:86] o4
WIominy meal... . . TRE fi 3.8: | 2.5 9-3 | 64.5 | 8.3 | 1:8.7 | 108
Gluten meal ssa se 9-6 | 1.6] 0.7 | 29.4 | 52-4 | 6.3 | 1:2. It
poultry keepers consider hard (flint) corn a better food than soft
(dent) corn, but in common practice no difference is observed.
Sweet corn and pop corn are practically the same in feeding value
as field corn but are not generally available for poultry feeding.
Because whole corn may be eaten so rapidly that a full meal is
quickly secured without exercise, the practice of feeding cracked
corn has become general. Cracked corn, when fresh, does not
differ in composition from the whole corn of which it was made,
but after being cracked it may deteriorate rapidly, especially in
warm weather. It is peculiarly subject to heating and to molds,
and when stale or moldy is a most unsafe food, particularly for
young stock. It is usually cracked in two sizes, — coarse, for general
use, and fine, for small chicks. Corn is the most easily digested of
the common grains. Because of this and its heating properties, the
free use of corn for fowls in close confinement and not plentifully
supplied with green food is usually followed, in hot weather, by
digestive disorders. With due attention to exercise, and with abun-
dant supplies of green food and the less concentrated animal foods
(insects, milk), good results may be obtained from a diet in which
corn is the only grain fed. In extreme cold weather it may be fed
more freely.
Corn meal. Corn meal is the foundation of most mashes for
poultry. Coarse, unbolted meal is to be preferred, and if mashes
are cooked or given time to swell after mixing, the coarser corn chop
POULTRY FOODS 187
will be still better. The corn meals on the market vary greatly in
quality ; a great deal of what is offered for stock feeding is made
of inferior or damaged corn. Corn meal is very liable to heat in
warm weather. The heating may be stopped by spreading the meal
two or three inches thick in a bin or on a clean floor, but if the
meal when cold smells musty or sour, it should not be fed to poultry.
Corn bran and corn middlings. Corn bran has considerably less
food value than corn meal. Corn middlings is richer than meal in
both protein and fat, and probably has a slightly greater feeding
value.
Corn and cob meal. Unless a-large part of the coarse, fibrous
material of the cob is sifted out, corn and cob meal does not make
a satisfactory poultry food. As a rule, poultrymen prefer to dilute
corn-meal mixtures with wheat bran or finely cut hay.
Hominy meal. The soft part of the corn kernel remaining after
the hard part has been separated in the manufacture of hominy
grits is ground into hominy meal. It has about the same analysis
as corn meal, and in localities where it can be obtained is often
substituted for it, as the more economical of the two foods.
Gluten meal and gluten feed. Gluten meal is one of the prod-
ucts separated from corn in the manufacture of glucose; gluten
feed is a mixture of this with other by-products of the samé process.
Both are very rich in protein and fat. They are not extensively
used for poultry, chiefly, perhaps, because meat meals and scraps
have been found so satisfactory in supplementing the supplies of
those elements in the ordinary poultry foods.
Whole oats. When of good quality, whole oats are about equal
to wheat in feeding value. The fibrous hull makes them less
acceptable to poultry than a smooth grain, and when a choice is
offered, they neglect the oats. When kept on an oat diet, how-
ever, they eat oats freely, provided they are of good quality. In oat-
growing sections, oats are often the only grain fed. Clipped and
hulled oats are sometimes used, but do not appear to be more at-
tractive to poultry than whole oats of good quality. Birds familiar
with other grains show a lack of eagerness for hulled oats and va-
rious milled forms of oats; this indicates that the fibrous hull is
not the only feature objectionable to them. It is probable that the
objectionable property is the fat, which is as abundant as in corn
188 POULTRY CULTURE
Tas_LeE III. ComposiTION AND VALUES OF OaTS AND OAT
PRODUCTS
| Water Fiber | Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |Nutrient/Calories
G % G, % % VA Ratio |in 1 oz.
Wheat Se ee ae ro5 | 7.8) 7.8 | 12.9 | 71.9 | 27 | 256.3 | 102
Oats : 11.0 | 9.5| 3.0] 11-8 | 59.7 | 5.0 | 1:6.1 96
Oatmeal . . 7-9 | 0.9] 2.0 | 14.7 | 67-4 | 7.1 | 125.8] 113
Oat bran . vor 9p | IOs3, | 3:7. 7-1 | 57-9 | 2.3 | 1:8.9 81
Oat feed ‘ ; 8.2. | 12:51] 4.2 | 12:6 | 56.3 | Gra: | weg.z 96
Oat middlings . g-2 | 38] 3-2 | 200 | 56.2 | 7.6 | 1:3.7 | 108
Rolled oats . 8.4 -{ 19] 15.0 | 66.6 | 7.5 | 1:5.7} 114
and has a less pleasing flavor. The generally poor quality of oats
offered for stock food tends to diminish their use as food for poultry.
Oatmeal. Oatmeal was long considered the best of foods for
chicks. This idea of its quality was based on tradition rather than
on results. It was common, years ago, for poultry growers to buy
the pinhead oatmeal prepared for human food, paying for it three or
four times the price of corn products, which, with a little modi-
fication, could be made equal in nutrient values (if that were neces-
sary) and which are much preferred by the poultry. Of late years
the use of oat products for young chickens is less common, and
rolled oats is generally used instead of oatmeal. At the usual
prices they are not economical foods.
Oat bran and oat feed. As Table III shows, oat bran and
oat feed contain very large percentages of fiber. They are rarely
offered for sale as straight products, but appear in combination
with ingredients which supplement their deficiencies.
Oat middlings. Oat middlings is a high-quality product, but is
not extensively manufactured and is not much used for poultry.
Sprouted oats. Oats sprouted until the blades are from four to
six inches long are much relished by poultry, but it is usually more
economical to provide a green food which does not require so
much care in preparation.
Barley. By analysis barley appears almost identical with wheat
in feeding value. Its nutritive ratio is slightly narrower and by
so much nearer to that of average good rations. As usually sold,
with the hull on, it is eaten by poultry less readily than wheat,
POULTRY FOODS 189
TaBLeE IV. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF BARLEY AND BARLEY
PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein '!Starches; Fat |Nutrient/Calories
% % % 4 oy Wi Ratio |in 1 oz.
lVheat . ro.5 | 28) 18) rr.9 | 74.9 | 2.2 | 126.3) 102
Barley .. S08 10.9 | 2.7] 2. 12.4 | 69.8 | 1.8 | 1:6 100
Barley screenings 12.4 | 7.6] 3.6 | 12.2 | 61.6 | 2.6 | 125.5 2
Barley meal. i : 11.9 | 6.5; 2.6 | 10.5 | 66.3 | 2.2 | 1:68 93
Malt sprouts . : 10.2 | 10.7] 5.7 | 23-2 | 48.5 | 1.7 | 152.3 87
Brewer’s grains (dry). 8.2 | 11.0! 3.6 | 19.9 | 51-7 | 5-6 | 123.3 97
but in barley of good grade the proportion of fiber is small com-
pared with the fiber content of good oats, and fowls habituated to
the use of whole barley, and not also supplied with wheat, will eat
it quite as freely as they would wheat. In practical feeding, wheat
and barley show no difference in results. There is an increasing use
of whole barley as poultry food in barley-growing sections. Its use
in other sections is less general, because of irregularity of supply.
It is usually sold at a figure enough lower than the price of wheat
of corresponding quality to make it the more economical food.
Barley screenings. Barley screenings consist of the less-developed
grains and often contain broken hulls, particles of straw, etc. If
clean they may be equal to good barley in feeding value.
Barley meal. Barley meal is almost unknown to American
poultry keepers, very little of this grain being milled.
Malt sprouts. The sprouts removed from barley sprouted in
the manufacture of beer are used principally for cattle feed but
occasionally for poultry.
Dried brewer’s grains. The residue from barley in the manu-
facture of beer consists of a small part of the starch with most of
the gluten, the germ, and the hull and is called brewer’s grain.
Its use as poultry food has not been extensive enough to determine
its value. At an appropriate price it should be a valuable food.
Rye. From the poultry feeder’s standpoint rye is an anomaly
among grains. As analyzed it closely resembles wheat and is not
markedly unlike it in appearance; the grains are smooth and a
little smaller in size. When fed to poultry accustomed to other
grains, rye is eaten by them reluctantly and in small quantities.
190 POULTRY CULTURE
On the other hand, the fact that poultry having access to ground
recently seeded with rye, though liberally fed on other grains, eat
it as readily as any grain, suggests that the changes incident to
germination make it more palatable to them. The extent to which
rye is used as food for both human beings and live stock in some
TarLeE V. CoMmPposiITION AND VALUES OF RYE AND RyE PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber} Ash Protein Starches} Fat /Nutrient!Calories
Ge % ve G % % Ratio | in 102.
Wheat . ros | 28) 18 | 11.9 | 77.9 | 2.2 | £:6.3| 102
Rye ‘11.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 10.6 | 72.5 | 1.7 | 1:7.2] 100
Rye bran 11.6 | 3.5 | 3-6 | 14.7 | 63.8 | 2.8 | 1:4.8 98
foreign countries indicates that it does not differ greatly from the
other grains in actual feeding value, and that, if necessary, it might
be more extensively used here. With abundance of other foods
there is no occasion to force poultry to a rye diet.
TasLeE VI. ComPosITION AND VALUES OF MIXED MILL FEEDS
Water | Fiber| Ash | Protein |Starches| Fat |Nutrient|Calories
or G % % % % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . _ wo5 | 18) 28] 14.9 | 72.9 | 2.2 | 126.3 | 102
Corn and oat chop (equel
parts) 11.9 awe 9.6 |71.91| 4.4 | 1:8.6] 106
Corn (8 parts) and ee
(§ parts) feed. . 11.5 2.7 | 10.6 | 71.21] 4.0 | 1:7.6] 105
“ Provender”’ (corn, 45 lbs. ;
oats, 125 lbs.; bran, 100
Ibs.) ‘ 5 9-4 | 10.4} 3-1 | 13.0 | 58.8 | 5.3 | 125.5 | 97
Corn, rye, and oats fevual
parts) . . dou j 10.4 1.9 | 10.6 | 73.72] 3.4 | 1:7-4 | 106
Mixed mill feeds. Under this head are described ground mix-
tures of the common grains and of their by-products. Such mix-
tures are usually made for a special demand, or to work off grains,
like rye and low-grade oats, that are not readily salable in their
natural form. They are, as a rule, more uniform in quality and
7 Including fiber.
POULTRY FOODS 19!
more satisfactory “than mixtures of by-products, because all nutri-
ents are present in natural proportions. The chief fault in mix-
tures containing oats is the presence of the loose, broken hulls,
which, apparently, irritate the digestive organs much more than
when swallowed on the whole oat. On this account these mixtures
are particularly injurious to young poultry, and when fed to them
should be sifted before wetting. They are also liable to heating in
warm weather.
TaBLe VII. ComposiITION AND VALUES OF BUCKWHEAT AND
BucKWHEAT PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |Nutrient/Calories
% % G % WA Ui Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat . : . : ros | 1.8) 28) 77.9 | 72.9 | 22 | 176.3 | 102
Buckwheat . nek 12.6 | 8.7] 2.0] It0.0 | 64.5 | 2.2 | 1:7 83
Buckwheat groats . 10.6 | 0.3] 0.6 4.8 | 83.1 | 0.6 | 1:17 103
Buckwheat bran. . . . 14.0 | 14.7] 3-4 | 17-1 | 46.4 | 4.4 | 1°33 85
Buckwheat middlings. - 13.2 | 4.1] 4.8 | 28.9 | 41.9 | 7.1 | 1:2.1] 101
Buckwheat. As a food for poultry, buckwheat appears much
oftener in grain mixtures than alone. Its analysis compares quite
closely with that of wheat, except as to fiber and ash. It is a large
seed, angular, with hard hull, and poultry are quite indifferent to
it in the whole form.
Buckwheat groats, buckwheat bran, and buckwheat middlings.
Buckwheat groats is hulled or crushed buckwheat. Buckwheat bran
is sometimes used in place of wheat bran and is very satisfactory.
Buckwheat middlings is also used occasionally in mashes. None
of the buckwheat products, however, are extensively used for poul-
try in this country. In Europe their use is more common, as the
preference there for white fat in poultry makes corn an objection-
able food.
Rice. Rice and rice products are little used as poultry food
except in countries where rice is the staple food for human beings.
In this country the quantities available at prices which warrant
feeding to poultry are too limited to admit of their general use.
Broken rice is often used in chick-feed mixtures. Occasionally a
poultryman secures a lot of broken or slightly damaged rice, or of
192 POULTRY CULTURE
a rice by-product, at a price proportionate to its feeding value and
to the price of staple grains fed to poultry.
TaB_e VIII. ComposITION AND VALUES OF RICE AND RICE
PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber) Ash Protein Starches] Fat |Nutrient} Calories
% % % % G % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. ros | 18| 18) 17.9 | 77.9 | 2.7 | 156.3 | 102
Rice ‘ 12.4 | 0.2] o4] 7.4 | 79.2 | 0.4 |I:10.9/ 102
Rice bran 2 9:7 | 9-5] 10.0} 12.1 | 49.9 | 88 }1°5.9 95
Rice hulls 8.2 | 35.7] 13-2] 3-6 | 38.6 | 0.7 |r:11.2] 48
Rice flour 10.0 | 6.3] 6.7] 11.7 | 58.0 | 7.3 |1:6.5 80
Sorghum seed. Sorghum seed is more like corn than wheat in
its constituents, but is smaller than wheat, round and smooth. It
is not generally available for poultry food but, when procurable at
a price not higher than that of wheat, makes a desirable food. Sor
ghum-seed meal may be used, in whole or in part, as a substitute
for corn meal.
TaBLeE IX. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF SORGHUM- AND BROOoM-
Corn SEEDS AND THEIR PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |Nutrient| Calories
% cA % A % Go Ratio | in 1 oz.
Whetts = 2 #4 105 | 78 | 18) 17.9 | 71.9 | 24 | 1:63 | 102
Sorghum seed . . 12.8 | 2.6 | 2.1 9.1 } 70.0 | 3.6 | 1:86] 102
Sorghum-seed meal . 13-2 | 1.8] 1.6] 8.3 | 71.3 | 3.8 | 1:9.2 ]| 3102
Broom-corn seed 14.1 | 7.1 | 2.0 9-6 | 64.7 | 3.5 | 127.6 95
Broom-corn-seed meal 13-5 | 69 | 2.1 9-7 | 64.2 | 3.6 | 127.3 95
Broom-corn seed. Broom-corn seed is nearer wheat in nutrient
ratio than sorghum seed and lower in fuel value. In appearance it
greatly resembles sorghum seed. Poultry may not eat it freely with
the hull on, but will eat the cleaned seed quite as readily as wheat,
and thrive just as well on it. Broom-corn-seed meal may be used
to some extent as a substitute for corn meal and middlings.
Flaxseed and cotton seed. Whole flaxseed and cotton seed can
hardly be considered as poultry foods, but their analyses are given
POULTRY FOODS 193
for purposes of comparison. If available, either could be used in
small quantities, but it would not be advisable to compel poultry to
eat more of seeds so rich in vegetable fats and protein than they
would take freely when fed a liberal general ration.
TaBLE X. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF FLAXSEED AND COTTON
SEED AND THEIR PRODUCTS
Water | Fiber} Ash | Protein |Starches}| Fat {Nutrient] Calories
% % OF % 1 % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat . ros | 78| 28) 17.9 | 77.9 | 2.7) 256.3 | 102
Flaxseed 11.8 | 7.9 | 3-4 | 21.7 | 19.6 |35.6]1:5 141
Ground linseed . . : 8.1 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 21.6 | 27-9 |30.4]1:4.8 | 137
Linseed meal (old process) | 9.2 | 8.9 | 5-7 | 32-9 | 35-4 | 7-9|1:1-7 99
Linseed meal (new process) | 10.1 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 33-2 | 38-4 | 3-0/1: 1-4 gi
Cotton seed . 5 9-9 |22.6 | 4.7 | 19.4 } 23.9 | 19-5]1:3-5 | Tor
Cottonseed meal 8.2] 6.6 9.2 | 42.3 | 23.6 | rg.n iter | TTI
Cottonseed hulls . 10.4 |44.4 | 2.6 4.0 | 36.6 2.0} 1210.1 52
Cottonseed feed. . 5-9 |21.57] 4-4 | 23-9 | 37-5 | 68] 1:2.3 89
Ground linseed. Ground flaxseed from which the oil has not
been extracted is called ground linseed.
Linseed meal. Linseed meal is ground flaxseed from which the
oil has been extracted. Old-process meal is made from seed from
which as much as possible of the oil has been extracted by pressure.
New-process meal is made from the residue of seed from which
a large percentage of the oil has been removed by a chemical
process. Old-process linseed meal is often called simply oil meal.
New-process linseed meal often goes by the trade name ‘ Cleve-
land flax meal.”
Cottonseed meal, cottonseed feed, and cottonseed hulls. Cotton-
seed meal is the only one of the three by-products of the manufac-
ture of cottonseed oil in which a poultry feeder would usually be
interested. Cottonseed feed might be used (at the right price) in
a ration which did not otherwise contain much fiber and fat. The
meals of this class are sometimes used in poultry feeding, but are
not popular as poultry foods, because it is found generally more
satisfactory to use animal foods to add to the protein and fat in
grain and vegetable rations. Cottonseed hulls are of little value
for poultry.
194 POULTRY CULTURE
Peas and beans. In limited quantities peas and small beans are
readily eaten by poultry. They will regularly eat a little, but object
to large proportions of them in their rations. Pea meal is sometimes
used in mashes, but more by amateurs and experimenters trying to
.secure maximum results than by others. All these products are
TaBLe XI. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF PEAS AND BEANS
Water | Fiber| Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |Nutrient| Calories
ly f ly % io % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat . : wos | 1.8) 28 | 12.9 | 77.9 | 2.2) 116.3 | 102
Peas . . ao 13.4 | 6.4]: 2. 22.4 | §2.6 | 3.0] 1:2. 85
Cowpeas. ie 14.8 | 4.1] 3-2 | 20.8 | 55.7 Tig) 152. 92
Peameal . 10.5 |14.4| 2.6 | 20.2 | 51.1 12°] 152.6 85
White field beans . 15.0 ea) Bur | “Bod | 5607) 1.60) weg 93
Navy beans 12a 2h | Bigs] even Caer 1.4] 1:2.5 go
Soy beans a ee 10.8 | 4.8] 4.7 | 34.0 | 28.8 | 16.9] 1:2.1 | 117
Soy-bean meal 10.4 | 2.6] 5.1 | 36.0 | 27.0 | 18.9] 1:2.6 | 123
unquestionably good poultry foods when properly combined with
others in rations, but supplies are irregular and prices usually too
high as compared with staple grain products to warrant using
them extensively.
Miscellaneous seeds. Of the seeds given in Table XII only Aajfir
corn and mzzllet are of any considerable importance to American
poultry feeders. In regions where it is grown, Kafir corn has been
quite extensively used for poultry, and is reputed equal to wheat,
with which it corresponds quite closely in analysis. Chinese and
Egyptian corn and durra are akin to Kafir corn. These seeds are
rarely available for poultry feeding. Millet is useful in a combina-
tion of fine grains for small chicks, or as a light feed for fowls, but
can be profitably used only when below wheat in price, and then only
to a limited extent. In feeding millets of different varieties it will be
observed that poultry prefer those having the largest seeds. Swz-
Jlower seed has a traditional reputation as an excellent conditioner,
adding luster to the plumage. Its value for this purpose appears
greatest when fed to fowls whose ration is deficient in fat, as is
the case with many flocks whose keepers are prejudiced against
the use of corn and meat. Birds having a ration sufficient in fat
POULTRY FOODS
195
do not usually show any eagerness for sunflower seed offered to
them in the hull, or shell (the seed might be classed as a nut),
though they eat the meat greedily when it is removed from the hull.
TaBLE XII. ComposITION AND VALUES OF MISCELLANEOUS SEEDS
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat Nutrient] Calories
% % % Ti % % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . . . ros | 28) 78) 21.9 | 76.9 | 2.2] 2:6.3 | 102
Chicken corn! . 14.8 | 8.7] 4.3 | 10.0 | 58.9 | 2.7] 1:6.2 87
Chinese corn 79 | r8] 1.5] 9-6 | 75.5 | 3.7] 1:88] 108
Durra . : 7.6 | 1.5] 1.7 9.0 | 76.0 2] 1:9.6] 110
Kafir corn . 93 | 14} 0-5] 9-9 | 74-9 | 3-0] 1:8.3 | 106
Egyptian corn : 12.6 | 1.9] 1.9] 9.9 | 69.7 | 3.9] 1:8 103
Millet. . : j 13-5 | 9.5] 3-0 | 12-7 | 58.0 | 3.3] 1:5.3 82
Hempseed . 8.0 | 14.0] 2.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 | 21.0] 1:9.7 | 119
Rapeseed .. . 138 | 10.0] 3.9 | 19-4 | 10.4 | 42.5] 1:63] 147
Sunflower seed 8.0 | 28.5] 3.0 | 13.0 | 23.9 | 23.6] 1:6.3 | 105
Green foods. The common things available for green food are
quite similar in composition and very low in feeding value when
TaBLE XIII. ComposirIon aND VALUES OF GRASSES AND LEAVES
(GREEN)
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches| Fat |Nutrient/ Calories
es G % % WA % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat Fi par wo5 | r8| 78) 70.9 | 70.9 | 2.2 | 1:63 | 102
Grass (clippings) : 76.4 | 4.4 | 2.4 23 | 13-8 } Tie] 127 15
Clover, red. . : 70.8 | 8.1 | 2.1 44 | 1335 | 0 | 137 23
Alfalfa. . 80.0 | 4.7 | 1.7 4.9 7-9 | 0.7 | I:1.9 17
Alfilaria 2 F 80.0 | 4.7 | 4-7 2.8 98 | 09 | 154.3 17
Barley E : 79.0 | 7.9 | 8.8 2: 8.0 | 0.6 | 1:3.5 I4
Corn e 4 2 79:3 | 5.0 | 1.2 1.8 | 12.2 | 0.5 | 127.5 18
Cabbage. . : 90.5 | 1-5 | 14 2 3-9 | 4 | 152 8
Lettuce . . be 95-9 | 0.5 | 0.8 1.0 1.6 | 0.2 | 1:2.1 4
Spinach F 92.4 | 0.7 | 1-9 2.1 2.4 | 0.5 | 1:1.7 6
Beet tops’ 90.0 0.1 1.3 2.3 | 0.3 | 122.3 5
Rape... . 86.0 2.0 1.5 8.63 125.4 12
Onion tops . gI.0 0.1 0.8 3:0 | -@2 | 12.7 8
1 Sorghum vulgare.
2 Akin to alfalfa. It grows wild in Southern California.
* Including fat.
196 POULTRY CULTURE
compared with wheat. The feeding value of all these things is
not so much in the principal nutrients as in their succulence and
the elements peculiar to the green state. In the grasses these
may be preserved in part by careful curing, but the vegetables are
useful only when green.
Cabbage. Because it is easily kept green, cabbage is the most
valuable of all foods of this class for poultry. Cabbage, sown thickly
in rows and fed from these sowings without waiting for heads, has
been found one of the most economical of green foods.
Lettuce. Poultry often, if not usually, prefer fresh lettuce to cab-
bage, but it has not the keeping properties of cabbage.
Spinach and beet tops. Unless very young and tender, the leaves
of spinach and beets are eaten freely only when the poultry are
short of favorite green foods.
Rape. Rape may be pastured or cut continuously, and is much
in favor with poultry keepers for sowing in yards, or for feeding
to birds in close confinement.
Onion tops. The tops of onions are eaten in small or moderate
quantities by all kinds of poultry. They are usually kept from birds
about to be used for table purposes, and from those producing eggs
for the table, because they impart their flavor to flesh and eggs.
Green-corn leaves and stalks, wheat, barley, oats, rye, etc. Any
succulent fodder may be used for green food if cut up so that the
birds can eat it. Such things are usually fed where green crops
in considerable quantities must be grown especially for poultry
and must be available before crops like lettuce and early cabbage
are harvested, and the unmarketable surplus can be used for
poultry food.
Ensilage. All kinds of ensilage can be fed to poultry, but it is
usually found more convenient to use cabbage and succulent roots.
Clovers and alfalfa. The only hays that specially interest the
poultry feeder are the clovers and alfalfa. It is desirable that both
be cut while immature and very succulent, and that the green color
be preserved as much as possible in the curing. These hays, as
cured for other stock, usually contain a large proportion of coarse
stems. When they are fed to cattle on the place, it is a common
practice to reserve for the poultry the leaves shaken off in handling
the hay.
POULTRY FOODS 197
TasLe XIV. ComposiTION aND VaLuEs oF Hays (Dry)
Water | Fiber) Ash | Protein |Starches| Fat /Nutrient| Calories
% % % % % % Ratio | in 102.
Wheat . ‘ : 0.8 | 1.8) 7.8} 11.9 | 72.9 | 24 | 226.3 | 102
Red clover ae 15.3 | 24.8] 6.2 | 12.3 | 381 | 3.3 | 123-7 67
White clover 5 9-7 | 24.1] 8.3 | 15.7 | 39.3 | 2.9 | 1:2.9 71
Alfalfa i 8.4 | 25.0] 7-4 | 14.3 | 42.7 | 2.2 | 113.4 71
Clover meal and alfalfa meal. Hay meals are in no way better
than finely cut hay, while it is much easier to adulterate them or
to mix with the leaves a large proportion of the woody stems.
TaBLE XV. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF RooTs AND Root
By-PRopuctTs
Water | Fiber) Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat /Nutrient} Calories
4, oh, Uh G, o, of Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat . 10.5 | r8&| 78 | rng | 71.9 | 2.7 | 163 102
Potatoes (white) . : 78.9 | 0.6 | 1.0 20 |) 1ge3. | Ort | L333 22
Potatoes (sweet) . oO 71.1 | 1.3] 1.0 1.5 | 249 | Og [1g 31
Beets (mangel-wurzel) 90.9 | 0.9 | I.I L.4 5-5 | 0.2 [154.3 8
Beets (red) . . 88.5 | 0.9 | I.0 1.5 8.0 | on | 155.5 II
Beets (sugar). 86.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 1.8 98 | on ]125.5 13
Beet pulp (fresh) go.0 |} 2.1 | 0.4 12 6.2 | o.r | 125.4 9
Beet pulp (silage) . 88.9 | 3-6 | 0.5 165 5.4 | 0.2 [14 8
Beet molasses . ‘ 25.7 8.8 73} 58.21 1:8 75
Turnips ; 90.5 | 1.2 | 08 1.1 6.2 | 0.2 |1:6 8
Rutabaga 88.6 | 1.3 | 1.2 :2 7 1:6.6 10
Carrots 88.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 I. 7-6 | o.g [1:78 II
Parsnips . 81.0 | 6.3 | 1.0 1.6 8.5 P98 15
Onions g 87.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 1.4 9-4 | 0.3 |1:7.2 13
Artichokes. . 79-5 | 08 | 1.0] 2.6 | 15.9 | 0.2 |1:6 22
Potatoes. Though the most important roots in the diet of human
beings, potatoes should be fed to poultry sparingly. In a cooked
mash they are eaten readily, but if the proportion of potatoes in the
mash goes above 15 to 20 per cent, and the birds are full fed of
mash, it seems to cloy them and spoil the appetite for the next
meal. Raw potatoes are sometimes fed to poultry, but are not eaten
readily unless the birds are very hungry for succulent food.
1 Sugar.
198 POULTRY CULTURE
Mangel-wurzel and sugar beets. The most valuable roots for
poultry are the mangel-wurzel and sugar beets. They are eaten
freely and have no bad effects. They cannot take the place of
green food fully but, being sweet and very succulent, are as good
a substitute for it as can be obtained. They are easily kept and
require no preparation before feeding.
Beet by-products. The by-products of beets are now attracting
attention as food for poultry, but have not been used enough to
show how they can be fed to best advantage.
Turnips. Turnips are fed both raw and in cooked mashes.
When fresh and sweet they appear to be as good raw as mangels,
but they do not keep so well and, as soon as they begin to decay,
are likely to give a disagreeable flavor to the eggs of fowls eating
them. The feeding of turnips not perfectly sound is probably re-
sponsible for the general belief that any turnip will taint eggs.
Carrots and parsnips. Carrots and parsnips are fed mostly in
cooked mashes, small, unsalable roots being used.
Onions. In any form onions are much relished by poultry. Only
very small quantities of raw onions can be given without flavoring
eggs and flesh. Cooked onions may be fed more freely, as cook-
ing drives off the volatile oil which gives the onion its peculiar
pungency.
TasBLeE XVI. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF FRUITS
Water | Fiber} Ash | Protein |Starches| Fat |Nutrient] Calories
% G % G % % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat . So i r0.5 | 7.8) 72.8) 11.9 | 77.9 | 2.7 [126.3 | 102
Apples . . 84a | 1:9.) C2 | G2 fp 14.3 | 0.3 1059.5 17
Tomatoes... . : 91.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 1.0 5-8 | 0.5 |1:7 9
Cucumbers . . : 96.0 | 07105] 08 1.8. | o2 |1s28 3
Pumpkin (flesh). . 93-5 | 1.0 | 06} o9 3-9 | O.1 [124.6 6
Pumpkin (seeds and
stringy part) . . 76.9 | 3.9] 1-5] 60 | 48 | Go J1:2 31
Pie melons . sx 94:5 | 1.2 |] of 0.8 2. oe lay 7
Watermelons . Gp cite ve 92-4 0.3 0.4 V7" |, O72) | 125 9
Grapes ..... 77-4 | 4.3 | 05 1.3 | 14.9 | 1.6 [1:14.21 28
Peaches : F 89.4 | 3.6 | ag | 0.7 58 | o.1 |1:8.6 2
Pears. . se og oie Se 80.9 | 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 | 15.7 | 0.5 J1:17 10
Plums. . . i a 78.4 1.0 | 20.11 1326 24
1 Including fiber.
POULTRY FOODS 199
Apples. All fruits and berries of temperate regions are eaten
with relish by poultry, but the apple is the only one that seems to
contribute substantially to their nourishment. The others may be
eaten in considerable quantities without any notable decrease in the
amount of grain required, but birds having access to all the apples
that they can eat will often eat much less grain than usual and
thrive remarkably.
TaBLE XVII. ComposiITION AND VaLuES OF Meat By-Propucts
Water | Fiber} Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |Nutrient] Calories
% A % % Wh % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . . E wo5 | 28 | 1.8) 11.9 | 71.9 | 2.2) £16.37 | 102
Green bones... . . 6.9 24.51 32) 16.5 | 1:1.8 69
Beef scrap. . . 1.3 8.0] 58.0 2.9] 1:1.4} 154
Pork scrap. . . a 08 2.2] 57-4 39.6] 1:1.7 | 170
Dried blood . 6.7 6.6] 65.1 5.3 | 16.3] 1:0.6] 124
Blood meal. . . 9.6 | 2.2 | 3.8) 74.1 8.8 | 2.1] 1:0.2 | 103
Green bones. As usually collected, bones have some meat adher-
ing. Different lots vary considerably in protein and fat. Green cut
bone of average composition is generally considered the best of all
animal foods for poultry. Its use is limited by the difficulty of se-
curing regular supplies, by the labor of preparing it, and by the
impossibility of keeping the prepared bone on hand in quantity in
any but extreme cold weather.
Beef scrap, pork scrap, meat meal, blood meal, dried blood, etc.
are cooked preparations of the offal of slaughterhouses and packing
houses. The scraps and meals are usually the residue of rendered
lard and tallow, scraps being coarsely, and meal finely, ground.
Goods of this class are often adulterated with material fit only for
fertilizer. Even when composed wholly of edible elements, there
are wide variations in quality, due to differences in condition of
material used. A good article may usually be known by its appear-
ance and by its odor when scalded. It should have the odor of
cooked meat, not that of fertilizer. The great advantages in using
these preparations are their convenience and their keeping qual-
ities. Most of them will keep for some months under any ordinary
conditions. Stored in a cool, dry place, goods of this kind have
been kept for several years without apparent deterioration.
200 POULTRY CULTURE
In the general experience of poultrymen the use of cooked-meat
preparations has been found the best way to add protein and fat to
rations deficient in those elements. While they are very valuable
articles, their use is attended always with more or less risk. In
addition to the dangers of unfit food already mentioned, there is
danger of overfeeding a good article. These preparations are so
highly stimulating that the poultryman is tempted to feed all of
them that he dares; and, to further increase the risk, manufac-
turers, in their desire to sell the largest possible quantities, recom-
mend feeding much larger percentages than it would be safe to
feed continuously if the goods contained even the minimum quan-
tities of protein and fat guaranteed. As they often contain much
greater percentages of these elements, it is not at all unusual for
poultry keepers following manufacturers’ instructions to get into
serious trouble through overfeeding products which are so much
more concentrated than fresh meat. In special cases (to be men-
tioned later) they may be fed very heavily; usually it is safest to
use only about half the amounts that the manufacturers suggest.
TapLe XVIII. ComposiTION AND VALUES OF FIsH, FisH Scrap,
AND SHELLFISH
Water Fiber Ash | Protein |Starches} Fat |/Nutrient| Calories
hs vA % % A % Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . a hg age! Sgt ro5 | 18) r8] 17.9 | 71.9 | 2.2 | 126.7 | 102
Fresh fish (generalaverage) | 44.0 |42.0'] 1.0 | 10.5 2.5 | 120.5 18
Fish scrap. . . e% 34-0 6.5 | 1:0.4 56
Oysters (in shell) . 15.4 |82.3 | 0.4 rt 0.6 | 0.2 | 1:1 3
Long clams (in shell). . 48.4 [43.6] 1.5 | 4.8 1.1 | 0.6 | 120.5 8
Round clams (in shell) . 27.3 |68.3 | 0.9 2.1 1.3 | o.¥ | 1:0.7 4
Mussels ...... 42.7 149.3 | Io] 4.4 2.1 | 0.5 | 1:0.7 9
Lobsters (in shell) . : 31.1 |62.1 | 0.6 5-5 0.7 | 1:03 8
Crabs (in shell) é 34.1 155-8] 1.4] 7.3 0.5 | 0.9 | 1:0.4 Ir
Fresh fish. All kinds of poultry seem to like fresh fish, and
it could probably be fed to the limit of their appetites without
detriment, but it is usually available for poultry food only in small
1 Refuse (bone, skin, shells). This analysis is taken from a table of analysis
of foods for human beings, — for which purpose shells are offal. The ash content
is of the fish without shell.
POULTRY FOODS 201
quantities in kitchen waste. Tainted fish is likely to give a strong
flavor to the flesh and eggs of birds to which it is fed.
Fish scrap. Fish scrap is not in high favor as a poultry food.
A possible reason for this is the poor quality of what is offered.
The same quality is often sold for poultry food and for fertilizer.
The bad effects of such articles are more quickly apparent when
fed in moist mashes than when fed in dry mashes. A good, clean
fish scrap should make an excellent poultry food, but too much of
what is sold does not answer this description, and the price, as
compared with the price of beef scrap, is usually far too high.
Shellfish. Poultry keepers living near the sea often give shell-
fish very freely. A common practice is to grind shell and all to-
gether. Fed in this way they are eaten with avidity and give
most excellent results.
TaBLeE XIX. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF MILK AND MILK
By-Propucts
Water | Fiber] Ash | Protein |Starches| Fat |Nutrient] Calories
%, % %, % we Gi Ratio | in 1 0z.
Li Reatis 3 a ee HOH wos | 78) r8] 24.9 | 77.9 | 2.14) 156.37 | 102
Whole milk. : : 87.2 335 48 | 3.7] 134 18
Skim milk (raised) . go.4 3.1 47 0.8 | 1:2 re
Skim milk (separated) 90.6 2.9 2 | 0.3] 1:2 10
Buttermilk . . 90.1 3.9 4.0 | 1.0] 1:1.6 II
Whey . é ; 93-8 04 | 0.6 5-0 | or] 128.5 7
Cheese . : 34.4 3:4 | 23:7 1.7 |36.9] 1:4 107
Milk albumin . ae 248 | 3.5 | 3-9 | 13-9 | 50-9 | 3.0] 1:4.4 83
Milk. All milk products are good poultry foods. The extent of
their use in any case is determined by the supply and the price.
Separated skim milk and buttermilk are the forms of milk most
generally available for poultry feeding. In the vicinity of a cream-
ery separated skim milk and buttermilk are often very low in price
and can be obtained in any quantity. Milk is usually given as a
drink. When the supply is sufficient, many poultrymen use milk
instead of water, to mix the mash. In this way the birds consume
more of it than they otherwise would. No bad effects have been
observed in such forced feeding of this article; indeed, from the
experience of Dr. C. F. Hodges, of Worcester, Massachusetts, in
202 POULTRY CULTURE
growing quail in captivity, it appears that the occasional feeding
of buttermilk separately is most distinctly beneficial. Investigations
at the Ontario Agricultural Experiment Station have also indi-
cated a measurable feeding value for whey, which, when separated
from the curd, had usually been thrown away by poultry keepers
as of no value.
Cheese. Cheese unsalable as food for human beings is sometimes
available for poultry. Products of this kind are, as a rule, best fed
after being cut up (in a meat or bone cutter) and mixed in mash,
thus insuring approximately uniform distribution and the minimum
of waste.
Milk albumin. The albumin separated from milk in the manu-
facture of milk sugar is a valuable poultry food, but supplies of it
in the market are irregular.
TaBLE XX. COMPOSITION AND VALUES OF EGGS
Water |Fiber'} Ash | Protein |Starches! Fat /Nutrient| Calories
G o, Ge % oi G Ratio | in 1 oz.
Wheat. . 3 i ro5 | 18) 7.8) 11.9 | 77.9 | 2.7 | 176.3 | 102
Eggs (hen) . aot 65.5 | 11.2] 09 | 11.9 9.3} 121.8 40
Eggs (duck) . 60.8 | 13.7] 0.8 | 12.1 13.5 )1:23 4g
Eggs (goose). . . é 59-7 | 14.2] 0.9 | 12.9 12.3) 122.2 48
Eggs (turkey) . al de 63.5 | 13.8} 0.8 | 12.2 9.7 | 1:1.8 40
Eggs (guinea) . 60.5 |16.9| 0.8 | 11.9 9-9] 121.9 40
Eggs. The eggs fed to poultry are usually infertile eggs tested
out at different stages of incubation. Wherever considerable
numbers of poultry are hatched, the infertile eggs are of much
importance as food. Even those containing dead germs may be
used for this purpose, if decay has not reached the stage where
an offensive odor is produced. When mixed raw with ground grain
or mixed in cake batter and cooked, eggs may be fed very freely.
The hard-boiled egg, traditionally the best first feed for young
chickens, is as well omitted from their diet. The preparation
in this form is unnecessary, and if the eggs are stale, or if the
cooking makes the white very tough, digestion may be difficult.
As its analysis shows, the egg is a highly concentrated food. All
1 Shell.
POULTRY FOODS 203
such foods need to be used with caution, when their natural form
is changed, as by cooking.
Mineral foods. The mineral elements (ash) in foods, disregarded
in calculations of food values, are of great importance in nutrition
and more important to poultry than to any other kind of domestic
creature. The rate of growth of young poultry is very much more
rapid than that of young horses, cattle, sheep, and swine. A chick
weighing 14 ounces when hatched, and 27 ounces at ten weeks of
age, has in the ten weeks multiplied its original weight eighteen
times. In ducks and geese the rate is even more rapid. In all
young poultry adequately supplied with material for making bone,
the rate of growth of the skeleton is more rapid than that of the
flesh (muscle). The adult female laying regularly requires (for the
shells of the eggs) much larger percentages of lime in her food
than any other creature consumes. Although (as the tables of analy-
ses show) nearly all foods contain some mineral elements, and many
contain quite large proportions of these elements,! green bone is
the only common article of food carrying a percentage of mineral
matter large enough to make it valuable for its special supply of ele-
ments of this kind. Because green bone (from its limited use) is not
a dependable source of supply of mineral foods, it is usual to supply
pure mineral foods, sometimes in small quantities finely ground in
mashes, but more generally in coarser form in receptacles from
which the birds take what they want as appetite directs. Dry bones,
shells, and various kinds of vock ground or crushed to convenient
size are used for this purpose. Charcoal is also commonly used
as an accessory to poultry rations. The actual need of these ac-
cessories and the quantities needed depend in any case upon the
amounts of mineral elements that the birds may secure in other
foods, or may pick up for themselves. The subject has not received
much attention from investigators, and nearly all studies along this
line have included observations on grit based on the assumption that
the primary function of grit is to grind food in the gizzard. From
such investigations as have been made, and from common observa-
tion, it appears that in ordinary good feeding of: mixed rations
under good conditions (range) young birds get quite all the mineral
1 Some foods low in protein and fat are especially valuable for their ash con-
tent; thus, bran is rich in phosphorus in an especially useful condition.
204 POULTRY CULTURE
elements that they require, and that adult birds get all that they need
except for the formation of eggshells when they are laying heavily.
Dry bone. Granulated or finely broken dry bone and done meal
are the commercial forms in which bones are supplied for poultry
feeding. Left to themselves, poultry will not injure themselves with
bone in any form unless the ration they have been receiving has
been very deficient in mineral elements. Bone meal is usually given
in the mash and is a frequent cause of trouble. It should be used
only occasionally and always in very small quantities.
Oyster shells. Crushed or ground oyster shells are the most
popular shell food for laying hens. As a rule young stock do not
care for ground shell. If they are forced to eat it, no injury may
follow, but neither will there be any apparent benefit. The need of
material for eggshells and the value of oyster and similar shells for
this purpose may be easily and quickly demonstrated in practice.
When shell supplies have been insufficient, the beneficial effects
of feeding shell will appear within two or three days.
Digestible minerals. The digestible minerals are principally in
the form of grits, the chief value of which is in the soluble mineral
elements, that either contribute directly to nutrition or assist chemi-
cally some vital process. When fed with indigestible grits, hens
whose ration lacked mineral elements have frequently been known
to consume and void very large quantities of grit daily.?
’ How far these are derived from other foods and how far from minerals picked
up on the range is a question for investigation. The question of grit, whether
for grinding or as a supply of mineral elements required in nutrition, is much more
easily disposed of in practice than in theory. Poultry keepers in practice gener-
ally leave it to the poultry. Grit is cheap, and, keeping a supply of it before the
birds, they know that if the birds need it, they have it. That disposes of the ques-
tion in practice but does not affect its merits. I followed the common practice
long after I was convinced in my own mind that the birds had no need of grit to
grind their food, but finally abandoned it, and since about 1902 have given no grit
to poultry except coarse gravel in the first feeds of young ducks and geese. The
function of this appears to be mechanical and to relate as much to the operation
of the crop as to the operation of the gizzard. This is sometimes apparent, also, in
feeding adults fowls and ducks. Zhe beneficial effects of coarse material are sometimes
seen immediately on feeding that material, and long before it reaches the gizzard.
2 In two such cases reported to me, consumption was at the rate of over a
quart per day for twelve medium-sized hens. A pen of twenty-five extra large hens
in my yards, supplied with indigestible grit and oyster shell, consumed in eight
months less than a pint of the grit, but frequently ate a quart of shell a week,
the consumption varying regularly according to egg production.
POULTRY FOODS 205
Charcoal. Charcoal is usually recommended for its medicinal
value. It is said to bea blood purifier and an absorbent of noxious
gases generated in indigestion. The practical poultry keeper usually
holds the same attitude toward charcoal as toward grit: it is inex-
pensive, and by keeping it before the birds he makes sure that
they get what they need. The occasional practice of feeding pow-
dered charcoal in a mash is not to be recommended. From con-
sideration of the properties claimed for charcoal it is obvious that
there can be little need of it when all conditions are favorable and
when the diet is right.
CHAPTER XIII
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING
A ration. In poultry feeding, the term “ration” refers particu-
larly to the composition of the daily diet of a flock. The quantity of
the ration is sometimes stated for flocks of given numbers, but the
numbers in flocks and the sizes of birds are so variable that deter-
minations of quantity must be made separately for each case. By
the daly ration is meant, usually, the food given. If the birds
are in yards large enough to supply them with green food and
with some animal food, the ration given might be wholly of grain
and the ration eaten might still contain all the green food that the
birds would eat and enough animal food to make the failure of the
keeper to supply that kind of food a matter of slight consequence.
In such a case the ration given is a graiz ration; the ration eaten
is a mixed or varied ration. Poultry wholly dependent on their
keeper for food require that varied rations be given them. They
may subsist for long periods on one kind of food or on a ration
giving little variety, but variety in the forms of food is one kind
of quality in a ration, and a ration lacking this is as insufficient as
one that lacks the required guantity of any nutritive element.
A balanced ration. In the usual technical sense of the phrase, a
balanced ration is a ration in which nitrogenous and non-nitroge-
nous elements are properly proportioned to meet the requirements
of the creature considered and the purpose for which the ration is
used, — that is, a ration having the correct nutrient ratio. In the
broadest practical sense a balanced ration ts one in which all
propertics perceptibly affecting nutrition and results arc in cqut-
librium. A ration may have the right proportions of principal
nutrients and yet carry too much fiber or too much mineral matter ;
or it may be too concentrated and “ burn”’ the digestive organs ; or
it may be so bulky that the greatest quantity the creature could
consume would not provide sufficient nourishment. The propor-
tions of ard and soft foods must also be balanced in some rations
: 206
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 207
to secure the advantages of soft food and yet avoid the digestive
disorders which may result from using it too freely.
A balanced ration is an average ration. From the nature of
the case it is impossible for the feeder to make the adjustment
of a ration to requirements accurate. The requirements of a crea-
ture vary from season to season and from day to day. Different
lots of the same food article differ in composition. It is not
possible to exactly determine the requirements of a creature at
any point of time, nor is it practicable to analyse foods as used ;
but as average requirements of creatures can be determined from
observations covering long periods of time, as the average of
analyses of many samples of a food gives approximately the com-
position of ordinary lots of that food, and as experience has taught
the right general proportions of concentrated and bulky, hard and
soft, dry and wet foods for rations for different kinds of poultry
and for different purposes, a ration balanced according to average
analyses gives an average ration which will serve as a standard,
and which, properly used, should give good results in every case,
though in many cases some modification of it would give better
results. Such modifications of standard, balanced rations can be
made only by each feeder on personal knowledge of the results
of using the standard ration in any case, and with an understand-
ing of the properties of foods and of the probable results of
making changes in the ration.
In practice, such an adjustment of rations to requirements of
poultry is a much simpler matter than it seems when stated ; for,
as far as opportunity is given them, the birds select their food to
meet their physiological needs, and hence nice judgment in feeding
is not needed except to get results which, however profitable to
the poultry keeper, and however necessary for his purpose, are
inimical to the physical welfare of the birds. (as in feeding young
chickens for very rapid growth, or hens for great egg production,
or in fattening poultry of any kind). In reality, in such cases the
feeder’s object is not to feed a balanced ration but to get as
far as possible from it in a particular direction. Thus, in feeding
for rapid growth, development of the body may be secured at the
expense of vitality, while in fattening, the rations are so rich in
fats and non-nitrogenous matter that many birds cannot stand
208 POULTRY CULTURE
them at all. Good judgment in selecting birds to be fed for a
special purpose is the prime thing in feeding for that purpose.
In common practice, feeding poultry is simple, easy work. The
best feeding is, in fact, so simple that the most of those who
undertake to feed correctly and fail, do so because they make the
work unnecessarily complicated, and rely too much on their own
understanding of the science of feeding and too little on the
natural capacity of the birds to balance their own rations. Given
normal, healthy, rugged birds and favorable conditions, a bright
child of ten, sufficiently interested in a flock of poultry to give it
regular attention, can feed it as well as any one. On the other
hand, when debilitated stock is kept under unnatural conditions,
all the knowledge of foods and all the skill and ingenuity in
feeding that can be applied may be needed to get the same
results.!
Methods of feeding are determined by foods, conditions, objects.
General practice in any line of poultry feeding comes ultimately to
the cheapest foods and the simplest methods that can be used.
Foods. ‘When the work is actually on an economic basis, the
greater part of the rations used for poultry in any locality is deter-
mined by supplies in that locality, — either the surplus suitable for
poultry food produced there or the surplus shipped in from other
sections. The available foods are not always those which give
absolutely the best results, but they usually give the greatest profits.
Conditions affecting feeding require as much consideration as
the composition of the ration. When the birds are kept under such
conditions that they secure a part of their food for themselves, the
kind and quantity thus secured have to be considered in deciding
what food shall be given them. When conditions are such that they
secure little or no food by foraging, it may be necessary to devise
methods of feeding which will insure the normal exercise of the
functions of or relating to nutrition. It is this incidental service,
and not any special virtue in the feature or method, which gives
1 To any one familiar with the practice of many poultry keepers under many
conditions this seems the best explanation of the fact that many flocks do
require very careful attention. Birds bred for generations under highly intensive
conditions are, with rare exceptions, so lacking in vitality that feeding them suc-
cessfully for any purpose becomes a system of dieting, and the ordinary routine
of caring for them is more in the line of zwssng than of practical husbandry.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 209
value to many methods of feeding which are supposed by those
using them to have peculiar merit.
The condition of most importance in relation to nutrition is
exercise. Ina state of nature poultry of all kinds feed, as a rule,
slowly and continuously for periods which are long or short accord-
ing to the abundance and variety of food. Thus, in feeding they
take a great deal of exercise, using up physical energy and the
surplus carbohydrates and fats in the food. Under such conditions
poultry rarely accumulate fat to such a degree that vitality or any
function is impaired. If fed with grain strewn thickly on bare
ground, or grain or moist mash in troughs, the birds can eat in a
few minutes, and with no effort except for the taking of the food,
as much as they would ordinarily secure by foraging for several
hours. The result is that fat is stored in the body until finally it
interferes with many functions, and at the same time, through
lack of use, the muscular system deteriorates and the bird becomes
debilitated.
In every continuous line of poultry culture, exercise is necessary
to maintain the physical vigor of the stock. Were the bird a mere
machine, it might be possible to keep it in working order by limit-
ing the quantities of fat-producing foods consumed. But poultry
(and especially the gallinaceous birds) are organisms of a very ac-
tive habit, requiring a great deal of physical exercise to keep them
in condition, and even when all the food they consume is given
them, it is usually found better to supply energy-producing foods
freely, and have the birds keep themselves in condition by exercise.
This practice has the further advantage of being more economical,
for the non-nitrogenous elements are, on the whole, less costly, and
a supply of them ample for all purposes insures conservation of
the more costly nitrogenous elements in the ration.
The common method of providing exercise for birds (particularly
fowls) in restricted quarters is to feed the whole or cracked grains
in a litter of straw, leaves, or other suitable material, from which
they can get it only by scratching.
Objects of feeding have a direct bearing on the selection of ra-
tions and methods only when the object is a special one requiring
a special ration, — and not always in such cases, for occasionally it
happens that the cheapest food and the simplest method will serve
210 POULTRY CULTURE
quite as well as the most elaborate plan of feeding that could be
devised. This is most likely to be the case when poultry produced
for a special purpose is kept under very favorable conditions. Many
poultry keepers use somewhat different rations and methods of
feeding for birds destined for different uses. Thus, in growing
poultry of all kinds, those that are to be killed as soon as fit may
be fed without regard to the effects of heavy feeding and lack of
exercise, while those that are to be reserved for laying and breed-
ing purposes must be managed with care to secure sound constitu-
tions and good physical development. Then the hen that is to
be used only for egg production, and marketed as soon as she
ceases to be a profitable layer, may be fed, after maturity, for heavy
egg production at the expense of vitality, while the hen that is to
be used for breeding purposes must be fed and handled with due
consideration for the maintenance of constitutional vigor.
Conditions are of more importance in all these cases than the
composition of the rations. It is quite a common thing to find
poultry keepers who use special rations for special purposes getting
from two different rations results just the opposite of those which
the rations are designed to produce, —as, for instance, hens kept
on a light or “‘ maintenance ’’ ration laying much better than others
of the same stock on a ‘heavy laying ’’ ration.
Rations for special purposes. Special rations are necessary only
when the object can be accomplished within a comparatively short
period. A special ration for such use is properly a finishing ration,
or a heavy forcing ration, and its profitable use is limited by its
tendency to put the birds out of ‘condition, and so, if too long
continued, to defeat the purpose for which it is used. Makers of
proprietary poultry rations sometimes offer special rations for almost
every conceivable purpose, their claim being that each is exactly
balanced for its purpose. The good foods of this class (except
fattening rations) are merely average balanced rations, and the
differences between them are insignificant, if not imaginary. Not
infrequently neither inspection, analysis, nor use will discover any
difference in these rations. As the poultryman buys them they are
almost invariably more expensive than grains, though the principal
ingredient in most of them is corn, the cheapest grain that the
poultryman uses. They often contain large percentages of weed
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 211
seeds, which the birds do not eat, and are sometimes heavily
adulterated with grit.
The sole advantage in using these mixtures is that the corn that
they contain has been carefully selected and kiln dried, and is, there-
fore, when the food is reasonably fresh, a safer food than much of
the cracked corn found on the market during spring and summer.
As a tule, @ ration adapted to continuous use for any purpose
Sor one kind of poultry ts adapted to continuous use for that kind
of poultry for all purposes. The only difference? in the require-
ments of the growing chicken and of the laying hen are that the
hen needs more lime, which is fed separately. The only difference
in the requirements of the laying hen and of the molting hen is that
the latter needs less lime. Between the requirements of the molting
hen and those of the growing chick there is no difference requiring
variation in rations. Even fattening (as will be shown when details
of feeding are given) can often be done very quickly, with the
ration slightly modified, by simply changing the conditions so that
all the fat-forming food consumed goes to fat.
Different rations are needed for different kinds of poultry. Yet,
as natural rations are similar at many points, the feeding of several
different kinds of poultry does not require that every feed be dif-
ferent. In the use of mashes especially, the same mash may ?
serve for all the common kinds of poultry, the variations necessary
in the ration as a whole being made in other foods. This point
is of no particular importance to specialists growing only one kind
of poultry for one purpose. Asa rule, the great majority of poultry
keepers find it more profitable to keep several kinds and a small
stock of each, and they save considerable labor by making parts
of the various rations identical. Comparisons of specimen rations
will show how far this may be done.
1 Between 30 and 40 per cent of grit has been found in mixtures of grain for
small chicks. Nearly all mixtures contain some grit (usually from 5 to Io or 12 per
cent), though the chicks do not need it at all.
2 That is, difference which in the present state of knowledge of the science of
poultry feeding can be considered in balancing rations.
3 The conspicuous exception to this is that a few of the first feeds of mash for
young waterfowl, and an occasional feed for a week or more, should have coarse
sand or fine grit mixed with the mash. I am inclined to think that in this case
the benefit is due to the supply of mineral matter rather than to that of a
grinding substance.
212 POULTRY CULTURE
The same ration may be used for young and old poultry of the
same kind. Young birds do as well on feed given to old birds as
on rations designed especially for their size and tender age. Not
every ration that might be used with good results for half-grown
and adult stock is suitable for small birds, but a number of the
rations in common use are suitable, or may be made so by very
slight modification. The almost universal practice of babying and
coddling young poultry has added greatly to the trouble and cost
of rearing them. The feeding in particular has often been made a
burden by the use of methods which hardly touched at any point
the methods used for adult stock. It is natural for the young of
all kinds of poultry to eat from the first the same foods as the
adult birds. Their ability to feed themselves from the start is one
of the principal points determining their usefulness in domestica-
tion. It is easily demonstrated that, under favorable conditions,
normal, healthy young birds will thrive on rations appropriate for
old birds. If the stock is weak, or badly hatched or brooded, or
kept under unfavorable conditions, the simpler diet and methods
used for rugged adult stock may be insufficient,! because, like de-
bilitated adult stock, the young birds require dieting and nursing.
Young poultry intended to be marketed at a very early age (as squab
broilers and green ducks) can be brought to marketable size more
quickly on a special ration. This exception is in accordance with
the statement that special rations are needed only when the object
can be accomplished within a short period.
Forcing rations. A forcing ration is any ration which furnishes
food in excess of what birds would take of their own inclination, if
abundantly supplied with food in general variety (grain, green stuff,
and animal food). The same ration may be a forcing ration for one
bird, not for another, and for the same bird a forcing ration at one
time, not at another. The most familiar illustrations of this point
are found in the relations between rations, conditions, and results
in feeding laying hens in extreme warm weather and in warm winter
weather. In extreme warm weather hens which can select their own
1 Insufficient to keep the weakest birds alive, or to secure as good results under
the conditions; but, as a rule, it will be found that when weak and debilitated
young poultry are given natural conditions and simple diet, those which survive
the hardening process develop better than they would under treatment which
brought a larger proportion to maturity.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 213
ration often eat so much green food that they have no appetite for
grain and will not consume enough to furnish the material for
constant egg production. In such cases the only way to keep up
egg production is to cut off or diminish the supply of green food. In
warm winter weather the regular ration, suitable for normal winter
conditions, may become a forcing ration. Poultry in winter quar-
ters are rarely supplied with all the green food they will eat. In
sudden changes from cold to warm weather they continue to eat
the usual quantity of the heavy winter ration, and many birds very
quickly break down under it.
Forced feeding is almost universal among poultrymen.! All
regular, good feeding is in a sense forced feeding. Even under
natural conditions, with opportunity to balance their own rations,
full-fed poultry develop faster and better individually, but at the
cost of shorter life and reduction of vitality in the offspring. The
poultryman’s object is to get as much as possible out of the birds
in the shortest possible time ; that is, to market as soon as possible
those destined primarily for the table, and to keep laying and breed-
ing poultry only as long as they are highly productive. He forces
by feeding, but not (intentionally) to the danger point, just as a
careful horseman often drives his horse much faster and farther
than the horse would go of its own accord, yet avoids overdriving.
Forced feeding is done not only by increasing the proportions
of proteins and fats in rations, but also by increasing the quantity
of the food consumed. In the cramming method of fattening,
the birds are actually forced to eat larger quantities of food than
they would take for themselves. The use of a variety of foods,
and of variations in the form in which food is given, has the
effect of inducing poultry to eat more food. This is much the
safest way of forced feeding, and the only one adapted to long
periods. It may be carried to its limits without perceptible injury
to vigorous birds.
1 The usual declaration of the poultryman describing methods or reporting
results, that he does no forced feeding, is erroneous, though not always inten-
tionally so. There is a great deal of misconception on the subject. Some think
that feeding a ration in common use is not forcing. Some call feeding animal food
forcing. One foreign authority on feeding calls feeding green bone forcing, but
feeding meat meal not forcing,— a most absurd distinction, for of the two the use
of meat meal is attended with much greater risk.
214 POULTRY CULTURE
Special preparation of food for poultry. With the exception of
cracked corn the hard grains fed to poultry require no preparation.
Though they are sometimes mixed before feeding, it has never
been shown that there is any advantage in the practice. Ground
grains and by-products usually require some preparation. Vege-
tables, fruits, and hay are fed with or without special preparation,
according to the nature of the article and to circumstances. In
general, the poultry keeper who has reduced the labor of poultry
keeping to the minimum does nothing in preparing food for the
birds that they could do for themselves without undue waste.
Variations in this practice are usually for economic reasons, econ-
omy of time as well as of feed materials being considered. To
some extent custom and habit fix practice, many continuing to do
some parts of their work by methods not the most economical
for them, though in general their work is on an economical basis.
Mashes. Ground foods as fed to poultry are called mashes. Pri-
marily and properly the term ‘‘ mash” applies to a moist mixture of
ground grain stuffs, either raw or cooked. The term ‘“ mash”’ was
generally used in that sense until a few years ago, when the practice
of feeding these foods without wetting gained some popularity, and
the food in this form began to be called a dry mash.
The practice of feeding mashes possibly arose first in connection
with the feeding of kitchen and table waste containing large pro-
portions of liquid or semiliquid foods (as soups, gravies, puddings,
etc.), full utilization of which required that they be thickened
with ground grain. As the numbers of birds increased until
the table-waste mash was insufficient, cheap vegetables and meats
were often cooked and, with the water they were cooked in, made
the basis of a mash. When these were not available, mashes were
made of ground grains alone. The great advantage of the mash of
table waste was in the variety of rich and palatable foods that it
added to the ration. This advantage is continued in less degree in
mashes containing vegetables and meat, though mashes of the lat-
ter kind have far less variety and are often altogether lacking in
the seasoning articles, — salt, pepper, mustard, etc., — considerable
quantities of which are in refuse from the table.
1 The term “dzv mash” is a misnomer, but as it has come into general use, it is
retained to avoid confusion.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 215
The supposed advantage of the mash (principally of grain) as it
came to be used by those keeping large stocks of poultry was that
the ground grain furnished food elements more quickly available
than those in the whole grain. While it was the almost universal
practice to feed mashes in the morning, the idea that there was
a great advantage in giving poultry a breakfast that would be
quickly digested and assimilated seemed very plausible. When the
fashion of feeding mash in the evening became popular, it was
found that as good results were obtained by one method as by
the other. Those who fed mashes at noon were able to report
equally good results. So common experience showed that it made
no difference at what time the mash was fed. Comparisons also
show that equally good results may be obtained, whether the mash
is raw (mixed with cold water or milk), partly cooked (scalded),
or thoroughly cooked. Poultry seem to do as well on a mash of
good consistency in whatever way it may be made. Sometimes
those accustomed only to a mash made in a certain way do not at
first like one made in another way. It is possible, too, that the
digestive organs of birds accustomed to mashes prepared in one
of the ways mentioned do not immediately adjust themselves to
mashes prepared in another way.
In general, the method of preparing the mash is determined by
the character of the ingredients used, and by the custom or con-
venience of the feeder. The use of thoroughly cooked mashes
is decreasing, and the tendency is to scald only when necessary
to give the mash the proper consistency, — a point which depends
mostly on the ingredients. Thus, a mash of corn meal and bran
will not stick together unless the meal is swelled by scalding, but
if a sufficient quantity of middlings or red-dog flour be added, it
will give cohesive quality to the mass, without the treatment neces-
sary to get that property immediately from the corn meal.
Making mashes. A dry mash is made by simply mixing the dry ingredients.
Moist mashes may be made in a number of ways. The methods of making
them vary according to the degree of cooking and according to the kinds and
proportions of adhesive elements that the ingredients contain. Leaving out
of consideration the effects of cooking, the object secured by moistening the
dry ingredients is the cohesion of the particles so that the finely ground stuffs
are eaten easily and without waste. This condition of the food is brought
about not simply by moisture but by a proper degree of moisture, and by the
216 POULTRY CULTURE
application of the moisture to suit the condition of the ingredients used. It de-
pends, first of all, upon the presence in the foodstuffs of a sufficient amount of
elements having cohesive properties. These are found chiefly in the finer and
heavier ingredients (as meal and flour) and are lacking in such foods as pure
bran and finely ground or cut hay. In any mixture, given a sufficient propor-
tion of foodstuffs having cohesive properties, the development of a cohesive
condition of the mixture requires that there be added to it only as much water
as is necessary to establish cohesion. If an excess of water be added, the
adhesive elements are too much diluted and so fail to hold the mass together,
and it becomes sloppy. If the proportion of adhesive elements is very large,
the mass, though containing too much water, still holds together as a soggy
dough. A mash that is merely sloppy is usually unpalatable and not so readily
eaten by poultry as a mash of better consistency ; it adheres to the feed troughs
and so may give as much waste as a dry mixture. A soggy, doughy mash is
very indigestible. .
The adhesive materials commonly used in mashes are corn meal, shorts
(proper), red-dog flour, low-grade flour, and ground oats. The adhesive prop-
erties of corn meal can be developed instantly only by scalding, — wetting
with boiling water. They are most pronounced in corn meal of good quality.
The adhesive qualities of wheat and oat products may be developed quickly
by wetting with cold water. Hence, a mash of corn meal and bran can be
made of the proper consistency only by scalding or cooking, while a mash
composed largely of corn meal may be given the desired consistency without
cooking, by the addition of one of the glutinous wheat products in sufficient
quantity.
When corn meal is to be scalded it is advisable to scald it separately,
making a stiff mush, and then stir in the other ingredients. If vegetables,
clover, or hay are cooked for the mash, enough water may be added to them
to scald the required quantity of meal; after the vegetables are cooked, and
while the water is boiling, the meal should be stirred in and then the other
ingredients. When the mash is mixed cold, the meals may be mixed before
wetting. If a scalded mash turns out too crumbly because of a poor scald, or
because of the addition of too much bran, the fault may be corrected by adding
water and flour until the desired consistency is obtained.
Oatmeal and ground oats work better when scalded, but will work up
better with cold water than corn meal. When milk, either cold or scalding,
is used for mixing mashes, less cohesive material is needed in the mash than
when it is mixed with water under the same conditions. Good beef scraps
and animal meals have highly cohesive properties, which develop quickly by
scalding and more slowly when wet with cold water. Soaked overnight with
a sufficient amount of water they swell enormously, and a good mash may be
made by soaking them thus in a pail or, if a large quantity is to be used, in a
mixing trough or box, then mixing in the grains in the morning. If preferred,
they can of course be soaked all day and the mash mixed in the evening. The
amount of water required varies and must be determined by experiment.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 217
Infertile eggs and eggs dying in early stages of incubation may be used in
mashes. All sorts of juicy and pulpy vegetable and fruit refuse may be used
freely in mashes by mixing with them the kinds of ground foods required to
give them proper consistency.
Small quantities of mash may be mixed in a pail with an iron spoon or with
a paddle, but for more than five or six quarts it will be found easier and more
satisfactory to use a mixing box and mix with a spade. In this way the mixing
is more quickly and thoroughly done, and a much smaller proportion of water
is required.
Standard mashes. While the composition of mashes in use
among good poultrymen varies somewhat, the differences in pro-
portions are largely influenced and offset by differences in other
parts of the ration or by differences in conditions. For convenience
of description and comparison three standard mashes may be
taken: (1) a standard grain mash, made of ground grains ex-
clusively ; (2) a standard grain and meat mash, like the first
with the addition of meat scrap or meat; (3) a standard complete
mash, containing ground grain, meat, and vegetable foods in such
proportions that it furnishes enough of these elements to keep the
birds in good condition, if not as much as they would take if fully
supplied and selecting their own ration. The proportions given
are by measure.
1. Standard grain mash. 1 part corn meal, 2 parts wheat bran.
2. Standard grain and meat mash, 1 part corn meal, 2 parts
wheat bran, 5 per cent of beef scrap or animal meal added.
3. Standard complete mash. 1 part corn meal, I part wheat bran,
I part vegetables, 5 per cent of beef scrap or animal meal added.
Nore. Supposing each of these mashes fed to adult birds once a day (all
that the birds will eat): Mash No. 1 requires with it hard grain and animal and
vegetable food; Mash No. 2, hard grain and vegetable food; Mash No. 3, hard
grain. The mash appropriate at any time and place depends upon how far the
requirements of the birds are supplied outside of the mash, and whether it is
more economical and convenient to supply animal and vegetable foods in the
mash or separately. The mashes described represent the minimum requirements
under ordinary conditions. The use of whichever of these is appropriate
should give good results, though not, perhaps, the best possible results. All
are rather light, safe mashes which, if properly mixed, may be fed freely.
They are often improved by the addition of other articles, as noted in
examples to follow; but with other parts of the ration as indicated, markedly
bad or poor results could not be due to feeding. Nos. 1 and 2 make good dry
mashes for birds otherwise full fed. No. 3 is not adapted to dry feeding.
218 POULTRY CULTURE
Popular standard mashes approximately chemically balanced
rations. Since the common whole grains have very nearly the
nutrient ratio of a standard ration, the ratio of nutrients in the
mashes fed with them should be about the same. Wide variations
(amounting to errors) from common nutrient standards in the mash
cannot be corrected in the hard grains of the ration, but must be
corrected either in the mash or by furnishing special supplies of
foods of the required character. The use of mashes —and espe-
cially of wet mashes mixed from day to day as used, and varied
in composition according to the judgment of a skillful feeder —
gives opportunity to use to full advantage many waste products or
cheap food products, to add to the variety of the ration by occa-
sional changes in the ingredients, composition, and consistency of
the mash, and, when desired, to make quick modifications of the
whole ration without changing other parts of it. The mash used
in this way gives the greatest possible flexibility to a ration. Con-
sidering results without reference to cost of labor, it is generally
agreed that a skilled feeder can get better actual results by using
wet mashes than it is possible to get in any other way. As to the
advantage of using wet mashes when labor is considered, there is
less unanimity of opinion.
Errors in the use of wet mashes. The wet mash, being capable
of great variation in composition and consistency, may become a
dangerous factor in the hands of an unskillful or of a careless
feeder. The greatest risks attend the misuse of the mash in feed-
ing poultry lacking in vitality and digestive power. Such birds may
be very seriously affected by sloppy, doughy, or sour mashes when
rugged birds would eat them with impunity.
Dry mashes. Dry mashes came into use because of the diff-
culties that many poultry keepers experienced in using wet mashes,
and because of the apparent saving of labor in preparing and the
greater convenience (in many instances) in feeding them.
Personal estimates of the value of dry mashes, as of all features in
feeding, are usually based on a comparison of the results of feeding
dry mashes with the results secured by the same person without
them, rather than on comparisons with any general standards of
results, or with the net results of the various changes in items
affecting the cost of handling poultry which the use of a dry mash
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 219
introduces. On the whole, the dry mash has not the advantage as
a labor saver claimed by those who exploit! it, though there are
features of its use which often give it a very distinct advantage.?
These are:
1. Convenience. Though it deteriorates with age, a dry mash
does not spoil so quickly as moist mashes do. Hence it may be fed
in hoppers always accessible to the birds, and the supply may be
replenished at any convenient time,— at intervals of a few days, a
week, or even longer, according to the capacity of the hopper and
the size of the flock.
2. Full feeding. In the hands of an inexpert feeder a dry mash
of the right composition, kept constantly before the birds, will
almost invariably give better results than a wet mash, provided
the same hard grains are given with the dry as would be given
with the wet mash. If (as is often the case) an effort is made to
compel the birds to consume certain considerable quantities of the
dry-mash mixture by reducing the grain until they will eat the de-
sired quantity of the dry mash, the results are likely to be disap-
pointing, for the birds do not like dry mashes well enough to eat
them freely, and are likely to be underfed. With a sufficient supply
of hard grain the dry mash becomes a supplementary feed, not
1It is doubtful whether dry-mash feeding would have become prominent among
poultry methods but for the advertising of trade mixtures represented as special
balanced rations for various purposes. For several years after dry mashes began
to be exploited in the poultry press, it was noticeable that those advocating and
reporting remarkable results by their use were, almost without exception, directly
or indirectly interested in the sale either of dry mashes or of hoppers to contain
them, and this method is still very much dependent on the advertising of interested
parties for the attention that it gets. The fact does not condemn the method, but
it must be considered in estimating its actual value and status. Usually the com-
plete “ balanced ration” is procured by buying a mixture of hard grains from the
same concern. Many of these feeds make good rations, but as many advertisers
labor, with some measure of success, to convince customers that they must have
these preparations and none other, it not infrequently happens that a poultry
keeper short of a supply of his favorite commercial ration puts his birds on short
allowance of it rather than take chances of spoiling the supposed exactly balanced
ration, the “formula” for which is the proprietor’s “ secret.”
2JIn correspondence with a large number of poultry keepers using dry mashes,
I was surprised to find a large proportion of them not making use of the advan-
tages of the method. Many fed dry mash in limited quantities, giving it daily.
Many fed both wet and dry mashes, this practice actually making more labor than
when the dry mash was not used.
220 POULTRY CULTURE
attractive in form yet fed in such a manner that it may be eaten
quite rapidly. Being always before the birds, it gives the weaker
ones and the slow feeders an opportunity to eat all they want; be-
ing unattractive in form, it does not tempt others to overeat ; and
so the food consumption of the flock is more equal. As far as
growth and production are concerned, full feeding, uniform through-
out the flock, is the principal advantage in the use of the dry mash.
Dangers in the use of dry mashes. Ground grains fed to poultry
in a dry state have a marked costive property. If the remainder of
the ration is too laxative for general use or for birds with a ten-
dency to looseness of the bowels, an appropriate quantity of dry
ground foods may be a corrective or preventive of diarrhea. Under
any other conditions a dry mash may be too constipating. The
costive property of dry mashes is particularly dangerous when a
mash contains a high percentage of animal food or other substance
rich in protein or fat, because it may prevent the slight diarrhea
which would give immediate warning of the injurious effects due to
an excess of concentrated food. Makers of commercial dry mashes
take advantage of this to use in their mixtures large proportions
of highly concentrated foods (not always of good quality), which
stimulate for a time but in the end bring about the usual results of
too heavy feeding of such articles. The tendency to produce con-
stipation may be offset by the liberal use of succulent foods, and
by feeding hard grain so freely that the consumption of mash is
small. The danger due to excess of concentrates is avoided by the
feeder mixing the mashes himself and limiting the percentage of
concentrates, or it may be greatly decreased by free feeding in
other parts of the ration.
EXAMPLES OF RATIONS
Of the examples of rations which follow, some are common rations in gen-
eral use among practical poultry feeders who have worked them out in practice,
without considering their chemical elements, — often without acquaintance with
the science of feeding. Rations of this kind can rarely be accurately described.
Each one who uses them knows about what quantities of different ingredients
he uses, but few know exact quantities and proportions, and the more skillful
a feeder is, the greater and more frequent are his variations from the standard
which would express the general average of his rations. The skillful feeder
comes, in time, to have a nice judgment in varying rations to suit conditions,
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 221
and, to break the monotony of the usual routine of eating, will often, for brief
periods, make very radical departures from his usual practice. Thus he gives
at one time a very rich mash, at another time a very light one; but he selects
the time for such changes with judgment, with a thorough knowledge of his
stock, and with an eye to the effect of the change on the general ration. Some
persons using approximately a common ration can describe their own ration
exactly. Two or more persons approximating a common standard, but with
different variations, may each suppose his the better ration. Usually in such
cases the rations are of equal value, the differences being immaterial either in
themselves or because of modifying circumstances.
All rations in common use have wide adaptability. The kinds most useful
for examples are those used at the various experiment stations. These are
more accurately described than most of the rations used elsewhere, and the re-
sults of using them are more fully stated, in reports of regular work, as well as
in reports of special experiments. The rations selected for examples are not all
good. The poor ration is sometimes valuable for purposes of illustration.
Examples of all kinds of rations are given and discussed as far as seems to
serve the general purpose of giving a comprehensive understanding of the
subject of feeding.
The examples are arranged (1) according to the character of the rations, —
first growing (including producing), then finishing, or fattening ; (2) according
to the kind of poultry for which they are used; (3) to show the sequence of
rations used in a system or in a certain practice.
Quantities are dy measure except as otherwise stated.1
RATIONS FOR FOWLS— ALL AGES
1. For young chickens on good range. Cracked corn and water.
This method of feeding young chickens was used for years by a farmer in
Massachusetts, who grew each season about five hundred White Wyandottes to
keep up his stock of laying hens. The range was in orchard and later in the
season over mowing land, supplying abundance of green food but not of animal
food. The ration was defective. Chickens grown in this way deteriorated in size,
but the average size of stock was maintained at a little below the average for
Wyandottes by using for sires large males from other flocks. This farmer also
engaged quite extensively in gardening. His method of handling his chickens
was developed because it was not possible for him, without neglecting other in-
terests, to give them the time and attention that more elaborate methods required.
2. For young chickens on good range. Mash (table scraps mixed, cold,
with corn meal, shorts, and bran, equal parts) once a day; cracked corn in
troughs or hoppers before the birds at all times.
1 In common practice it is more convenient to mix feeds by measure than by
weight. When large quantities are mixed it is usual to measure dy te bag and part of
a bag. Then the mixing is still by measure, but the weights of measures of various
ingredients are known. In experimental work parts are usually given dy weight.
222 POULTRY CULTURE
The chickens in this case were kept in an orchard, about seventy-five
chickens having the range of about an acre of land. As the chicks grew, the
allowance of mash for each was quite small, but this was made up in the waste
apples falling from the trees. Under the conditions the ration was ample,
securing the full development of the birds. Practically the same results would
be secured by feeding any good mash in place of that used.
3. For chickens (for market) in brooder houses and on poor range from
weaning to maturity. Cracked corn and beef scrap always before them in
separate hoppers; limited pasture of winter rye; occasional feeds of cabbage.
This is the ration in common use among the soft-roaster growers of eastern
Massachusetts, from the time when the chickens leave the brooder houses. The
supply of green food is usually much less than the birds would take. The ration
is a fattening one and does not, as a rule, secure the fullest development (growth)
of the birds, but in some cases remarkably large, fine birds are produced. The
birds are not confined, but the range after the early part of the season affords
scant picking. They take only exercise enough to keep digestion good, and be-
come as fat as the American market requires, without any addition to this ration.
4. For young chickens. Baked “ johnnycake” (or any similar cake) fed as
often daily as desired, either without hard grains or in alternation with them.
Fine table scraps and infertile eggs may be mixed in johnnycake, making it
a more complete ration. To make such a cake, add a little soda to sour milk,
put in the scraps finely broken and the eggs (including shell), stir in coarse
corn meal to make a very stiff batter, bake well.
This is a convenient way of providing the “soft” food for small flocks of
chicks in a form in which it may be kept in good condition for a number of days.
Clean, sweet table scraps (broken small) and infertile eggs (with shells) may be
mixed in the batter and baked, making the cake a complete ration, except for
the green food. Chicks on young grass can get all the green food that they need
for themselves. Chicks in confinement will do very well on this cake alone for
a while, but are better for regular supplies of green food. After a few weeks
chicks which do not get green food begin to show lack of development. Some
poultry keepers bake cakes for quite large numbers of young chickens, but it is
neither necessary nor economical to do so.
5. For young chickens on good range. Mash in the morning ; cracked corn at
g.30 A.M.; cracked corn, whole wheat, or mash at 2 p.M.; cracked corn at 6 P.M.
The difference between this and example 3 is only in the method of feeding,
the grains (and sometimes one mash feed) being given, in about such quantities
as are required, at stated times. This is often advisable for small lots of chicks
when keeping supplies of food before them attracts pigeons or sparrows. Some
poultry keepers who grow large numbers of chicks also prefer to give regular
feeds, especially if the conditions are not favorable to exercise or if it seems
advisable to keep quite close oversight of the stock.
6. For weaned chicks and fowls on good range. Mash in the morning;
cracked corn or any grain or mixture of grains desired,—a day’s allowance
scattered broadcast over the range; mash in the evening.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 223
This is one of the simplest and most satisfactory ways of feeding stock birds
in summer, to develop frame and muscle and constitution in the young and to
keep the adults in good condition. The grain may be scattered in grass several
inches high or in brush. The birds will get it all and require no attention
from morning until evening.
7. For fowls in houses with littered floors. Mash once a day (morning,
noon, or night); the day’s allowance of grain (any common grain or mixture)
scattered in the litter at any time of day. Cabbage or mangels before the
fowls at all times.
This is example 6 adapted to winter conditions. In summer the feeding
may be done at any time of day, but usually morning and evening are more
convenient. In winter it is often an advantage to give the food at noon
or in the evening. If the quantity of litter on the floor is sufficient, and
the grain is well concealed, there is no objection to giving the grain and mash
at the same time. As a rule, the birds will eat the mash first. They may
pick up a little of the grain at that time, but most of it is left until they are
hungry again.
8. for brooder chicks. Start the chicks on commercial mixtures, given
five or even six times a day in troughs, with occasionally a feed of beef scrap
instead. After the first few days, give two or three of the feeds of dry mash
(two parts shorts, or mixed feed, to one part corn meal) by measure. After the
chicks are three or four weeks old the commercial mixture is discontinued,
and the ration consists of dry mash and beef scraps, and a scratch feed ” con-
sisting of one part hulled oats, one part cracked wheat, and two parts cracked
corn. This, with green food as available, is continued until the chicks are about
ten or twelve weeks old.
This is the ration used by a soft-roaster grower up to the time when his
chickens go into the colony houses and are given the ration in example 3.
Frequent feeding is advisable when chicks are kept in large numbers under
artificial conditions. This is to keep them occupied and to prevent the develop-
ment of vices and the soiling of the food (on the floor or in shallow troughs)
rather than because (as is commonly supposed) the chicks need feed so often.
By feeding often, and feeding a considerable amount of soft foods and concen-
trated foods, little chicks grow faster at first, up to about ten or twelve weeks.
After that those brought up on three or four meals a day, of which a large per-
centage is hard grain, will usually outgrow them, because they have better
digestion and greater vitality. The use of commercial mixtures does not always
indicate that the feeder regards them as better than corn or than such a mix-
ture as he might make himself. Some do prefer certain brands, but it is not
unusual for manufacturers to offer inducements to poultry growers of reputa-
tion to use some of their feeds, if only a few bags annually. In the above
ration, feeding is not reduced to the simplest form, as it is in the rations used
by the growers in this section for the weaned chicks.
9. for laying stock on good range. Mash, corn meal, bran, and beef
scrap in varying proportions, from one third to one half of the ground grains
224 POULTRY CULTURE
(by measure), corn meal, and from 5. to 10 per cent of the total beef scrap or
animal meal; cooked overnight; fed in the morning; grain in hoppers acces-
sible at all times.
This is the method of the colony poultry-farming district of Rhode Island.
Different poultry keepers here vary the proportions of ingredients in the
mash, often according to habit or individual custom rather than on judg-
ment. Cracked corn is the principal grain fed. Mixtures of grains are some-
times used, or variety may be introduced by occasionally filling a grain hopper
with wheat or oats. The point of chief interest in connection with practice in
this district is the general uniformity of results in spite of considerable super-
ficial differences in feeding practice, and the generally good condition of the
stock in spite of features of feeding which, under less favorable conditions, are
apt to cause trouble. To illustrate: One may find one farmer feeding to young
chickens, goslings, and ducklings a very carefully made and cooked mash,
his next neighbor feeding a very carelessly compounded, sloppy mash, and all
the youngsters thrifty. The general conditions and the abundance of other
food reduce the advantage of careful, and minimize the ill effects of careless,
feeding. Data for close comparisons of results and profits are not obtainable,
but it is easily seen that some of the most prosperous poultry keepers in the
Rhode Island district would soon put themselves out of business if they should
undertake to apply their feeding practice under intensive conditions.
MAINE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RaTIONS
Examples 10-16 give the various rations used at the Maine Experiment
Station.
10. For young chickens in brooders. For the first two or three days, infer-
tile eggs boiled for half an hour, ground (shell and all) in a meat chopper and
rubbed together with about six times their bulk of rolled oats, and fed with
chick grit on the brooder floor. About the third day the following mixture of
small broken grains is given:
Parts by
weight
Cracked wheat ea Le Pees ae ‘ - 15
Pinhead oat meal 4 boty ah eee : es 10
Fine cracked corn . Behar os ae hens nhs ee eg
Fine cracked peas . 3
Broken rice 2
Chick grit 5
Fine charcoal . 2
1 Ina trip through this district in May, 1911, a number of the farmers whom I met
complained to me that rations always before satisfactory did not seem to agree
with young chickens, geese, and ducks. This is easily explained. Both the spring
and the preceding winter were bad seasons for poultry. Consequently, the stock
was weakened and the young birds could not stand errors in their diet which,
under more favorable circumstances, had produced no ill effects.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 225
This is fed at daylight in such quantity that the chicks will be hungry for a
nine o’clock feed of the boiled-egg and rolled-oat mixture. At 12.30 the hard-
grain mixture is fed again; at 4.30 or 5 the egg-and-oat mixture.
When the chicks are about three weeks old the following wet mash is
substituted for the egg-and-oat mixture:
Parts by
weight
Wheat bran (clean) . 2
Corn meal 4
Middlings or red- tog Alene a
Linseed meal I
Beef scrap 2
This mixture is slightly moistened with water and fed in troughs. When
the chicks are five or six weeks old the fine-grain mixture is discontinued and
the feeds given in the litter are wheat and fine cracked corn.
This ration and the method of using it may be taken as typical of practice
with brooder chicks. The frequent feedings appear to be necessary when
chicks are kept in large groups (from fifty to one hundred or more in each brooder
or section) under artificial conditions. In the prevailing view the danger of
keeping food by them is the danger of overfeeding. It is more likely that the
true causes of the disorders that sometimes result from that practice, in the
conditions under consideration, are slow poisoning through eating food soiled
by the excrement of the birds, weak constitutions or weak digestion requiring
dieting, and the concentrated nature of the mashes used. In this case the egg-
and-oat combination is a very rich food; so is the mash with every ingredient
but wheat bran (two elevenths of the whole) a heavy food. Wrong tempera-
tures in brooders are also often responsible for troubles for which the food is
blamed. In using rations of this kind it is not essential that the proportions
of different ingredients be carefully adjusted. It is not always certain that
all the foods in a hard-grain mixture like this are eaten. Comparison of
results with simpler rations indicates an equal feeding value for rations con-
taining fewer articles. Many poultry keepers prefer to feed such foods as
peas, rice, millet, etc. in small quantities separately, so that they may observe
just how they are eaten, and feed accordingly. Grit and charcoal are usually
given separately in small troughs or hoppers. As has been stated, the necessity
of these food accessories is doubtful. It is certain that they are not required
regularly in the proportions here used.
11. For young chickens in brooders. Same as above, except that fine beef
scrap is substituted for eggs in the oat mixture and the mash used is a dry
mash of the following composition:
Parts by
weight
Rolled oats 2
Wheat bran . 2
Corn meal 2
Linseed meal 2
Beef scrap I
226 POULTRY CULTURE
12. For young chickens in brooders. Same as above, except that the first
mash for the chicks is compounded as follows:
Parts by
weight
Wheat bran b & ere le a P soe : ee
Corn meal . . F : zo 34
Linseed meal . ay : ‘ : 2 ee
Beef scrap . 2
Alfalfa meal I
To this mixture when scalded is added one part of rolled oats to three parts of
the mixture, the oats being added after scalding, to prevent the sogginess pro-
duced when rolled oats are scalded in the mixture. This mash and the grains
as in ration Ito are fed until the chicks are about three weeks old, when the
following mash is used until the chicks are from six to eight weeks old:
Parts by
weight
Wheat bran . 2
Corn meal 3
Linseed meal 3
Daisy flour I
Beef scrap I
Ration 12 is preferred at the Maine station. If the criticism on the con-
centrated nature of the mash in ration ro is sound, a ration preferred to it in
practice must be less concentrated. The first mash used in ration 12 has in
the dry mixture four elevenths of wheat bran and one eleventh of alfalfa meal,
a still more bulky article. The rolled oats, introduced after scalding, still
further lightens the mixture, so that this mash, as fed, is only about half as
concentrated as that in ration Io.
13. For young chickens in brooders. Same as above, fed later in the season,
when the chicks could get out on the ground. The mixture of grains described
in 10 and the mash described at 11 (fed dry in troughs) always before them.
As reported, this worked well except in bad weather, when the chicks
remained under cover and, it is stated, “ would hang around the troughs and
overeat, would grow rapidly for a few days, then commence to go lame, eat
little, and seek the warm hover never to recover.” Such a result is in accord-
ance with what was said (p. 220) of the dangers of dry mashes rich in concen-
trated foods. With food of the right composition and consistency, overfeeding
healthy chickens on a good range is practically an impossibility.!_ In this case
the range was not large enough to furnish full supplies of green and of animal
food. It did not afford the full advantages of a range.
1] think that it will be found, on close investigation, that this applies to chicks
under all conditions. That it applies to natural conditions is certain. I have
not, in recent years, been so situated that I could test its application to arti-
ficial conditions. An adequate test of this point would require experiments more
extensive and elaborate than an individual poultry keeper can make.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 227
14. for weaned chicks on range (one thousand chicks to two acres).
Cracked corn, wheat, cracked bone, and oyster shell and grit, in separate slatted
troughs, in constant supply; also, in separate trough, the following dry-mash
mixture :
Parts by
weight
Wheat bran. ths a see, fae BO MA A tke Si Bede oF
Corn meal ‘ Rene. es . » 2 2
Middlings : 4 we I
Beef scrap I
This method of feeding has been found satisfactory under the conditions
described. The dry-mash mixture is too rich for general use, but the constant
supply of cracked corn and wheat, and the range conditions, enable the birds
to balance the ration:
15. for laying hens. This is the ration first adopted at the Maine station
and published and widely adopted as a model ration.
Parts by
weight
Dry mash . ee TA : bh rac:
Wheat bran . I
Corn meal é I
Middlings .... ye 4 I
Gluten meal or brewer’s grains I
Linseed meal I
Beef scrap I
With this mash constantly before them the hens were fed, to each hundred
hens, early in the morning, 4 quarts of whole corn scattered from six to eight
inches deep in the litter, and at 10 A.M., 2 quarts of wheat and 2 quarts of oats
in the litter.
The dry mash used was a very rich one for any combination, and far too
rich to be given with such limited hard-grain rations. In the flocks fed on this
ration at the station and elsewhere cases of indigestion were numerous, and
the mash has recently been modified.
16. For pullets just off range. Ward grains as above; for the first month
(September) in the laying house, mash as follows:
Parts by
weight
Bran . : 42-8 3 . : 3
Corn meal Fi oe ee ee) & ro
Middlings . be be Us oh os fe ah Gg
Meat scrap I
For the second month (October) : Parts by
weight
BEAM Sox: Wes Ee a ep Boag “Ge veo A ?
Corn meal
Middlings .
Gluten meal .
Meat scrap
oe
228 POULTRY CULTURE
Green food is supplied in the form of sprouted oats. In succeeding months
one half part of linseed meal is added to the mash every other month.
It is reported that better results followed the change in the mash. Judged
by conditions in general feeding practice, the mash as used in September is a
better mash for continuous use than those used afterwards, and an increase in
the amount of hard grain given would be likely to give better average egg
production, though it might reduce the production of some of the heaviest
layers. This ration, even as modified, is a very heavy forcing ration.
ONTARIO EXPERIMENT STATION RaTIONS
17. For chicks in indoor brooders. Dry mash of equal parts of bran, corn
meal, low-grade flour, and middlings, to which is added § per cent of beef
scrap and a teaspoonful of charcoal to the gallon of mash. Mixed grains
(cracked wheat, cracked corn, pinhead oatmeal), equal parts. Fed in alterna-
tion, five times a day until chicks are about three weeks old, then three times
a day until they are about six weeks old, after which they are hopper fed. The
chicks are given milk to drink as regularly as the supply permits. The milk
is considered especially valuable in starting the chicks.
It will be noted that this is a simpler and much less concentrated ration
than those used at the Maine station. It should give, and apparently does
give, as good results with less risk and perhaps at a little less cost. Exact com-
parisons of such points for different rations used by different persons, for dif-
ferent stock, under different conditions are manifestly impossible. Observation
of the stock and information supplied incidentally in reports of various experi-
ments seem to the author to warrant the statements made as to value and cost.
18. For chicks on range (either in brooders or with hens). Same as above,
but fed in hoppers from the start, with hulled oats and wheat substituted for
pinhead oatmeal and cracked wheat after the first few weeks.
The range in this case is an exceptionally good one, orchards, cornfields,
and pastures being available on the college and station farm of over five hun-
dred acres. With good range and a mash not overloaded with heavy foods,
the hopper feeding of chicks has been practiced here for a number of years
without the occurrence of troubles commonly ascribed to overfeeding. Equally
good range conditions are found on any large farm and on many small farms.
With good range the beef scrap is not essential, but at this station it is sup-
plied, to make sure that there is no lack of animal food.
19. Sumucer ration for fowls (yarded), Dry mash, in hoppers; for old
hens, wheat bran; for pullets, equal parts bran, low-grade flour, and barley
chop or meal. Grain fed twice a day, wheat in the morning and wheat and
barley or corn in the evening, corn being used only when very cheap.
20. Wenter ration for fowls confined to the house. Dry mash as above.
Morning feed, whole wheat from six to eight inches deep in the litter; about
noon, a littlke more wheat and whole mangels or clover hay; about 3.30 P.M.,
wet mash of boiled vegetables, waste bread, and occasionally kitchen scraps
thickened with the same meals used in the dry mash, about ro per cent beef
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 229
scrap or animal meal added, except when green cut bone is given as a separate
feed; just before dark, all the whole corn the birds will eat.
The two rations above used, each in its season, make a good ‘' system ” for
the year. The yards in this case give fair foraging conditions. The winters
are long and hard. With sufficiency of litter the labor may be reduced by
bringing all feeding but the mangels and clover into the latter part of the
afternoon, giving all the wheat at the same time as the whole corn in winter,
and all the grain at one feeding in summer.
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
Ration
21. For laying hens. Dry mash: Parts by
weight
Corn meal . . ae : 33
Bran . . & 5 s 3 . - 5b
Middlings : noes bea . : 3
Oil meal . d a 03 F : : I
Beef scrap . : é 3 2h
Fed in hoppers in constant supply. Grain, whole corn and wheat, in ap-
proximately equal parts.
This ration was used in an experiment in feeding six hundred laying hens
(Leghorns) which returned a net profit of almost exactly one dollar per hen
($602.28), on a rather low average egg production (113). The hens had free
range except in bad weather, and for green food had also ensilage, of which
they consumed about three fourths of a ton.
Kansas AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE EXPERIMENT STATION RaTIONS
22. For young chickens. Dry mash: Parts by
weight
Corn meal 2
Shorts . 2
Bran . ¢
Beef scrap i
Charcoal . 4
Grain mixture: Parts by
weight
Corn chop (sifted) . Ae gl fe » 2
Cracked Kafir corn f 2
Cracked wheat. . . eo Xx Se hs AG 2
Millet I
1 Taken from Bulletin 115 of the West Virginia Experiment Station. The de-
scription of the method of feeding in the bulletin does not give the proportions
of articles used, but gives the total weights of each consumed, from which the
proportions work out approximately as I give them, a few minor items which do
not materially affect results being disregarded.
230 POULTRY CULTURE
Dry mash kept before the chicks all the time. Grain fed in litter five times
a day for the first few days, and after that three times a day. After a few weeks
whole grains were substituted for the cracked grains.
The amount of charcoal in the dry mash is excessive, even granted that
charcoal is necessary; compare 6 per cent of charcoal with the amounts used
in the Maine and Ontario rations. The proportion of beef scrap is greater
than is advisable. The ration as a whole is reported to give good results, but
the relative proportions of mash and grain eaten are not noted. With a sufficient
supply of grain the chicks themselves avoid the danger of the too concentrated
mash by eating more of the grain mixture (see p. 220). The use of Kafir
corn in the ration illustrates the adaptation of locally available foods to general
formulas for feeding. Kafir corn can be grown when and where Indian corn
cannot, and under such conditions may be the cheaper food. In the eastern feed
stores Kafir corn is in small supply and at high prices, and under such condi-
tions is not used by poultry keepers who understand feeding.
23. For laying hens (confined). Dry mash:
Parts by
weight
Shorts . 5 : - 6
Bran . 3
Corn meal : ‘ 6
Beef scrap 5
Alfalfa meal t
Grain mixture: Parts by
weight
Wheat . Be Mame es tae ad 2 aie
Corn. : a4 a 3
Oats . I
Mash fed in hoppers; grain scattered in litter. Used in the proportions by
weight of twenty-one pounds of mash to twenty-five pounds of grain, the ration
has a nutrient ratio of 1: 4.
As fed, this was a heavy forcing ration and gave a large egg yield. The
report on it is based on a short period,—less than a year. The hens were
forced to eat mash by having the grain cut down until they would eat the
amount of mash required to make the ration of the nutritive ratio designed.
The ration is not suitable for breeding stock or for hens intended as layers
for more than one season, but may often be profitably used with laying stock
from which it is desired to get the largest possible egg yield in a short time.
CORNELL UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RaTIONS
24. Variety ration for young chickens.1 First to third day: Bread
crumbs, 8 pounds ; hard-boiled eggs, 2 pounds ; this mixture moistened slightly
with sweet skimmed milk and fed five times a day. Finely cracked grain, —
1 Bulletin No. 282, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station.
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 231
wheat, 3 parts; corn, 2 parts; hulled oats, 1 part,— kept before chicks in shal-
low trays containing a little bran.
Third to seventh day: For the bread and eggs was gradually substituted a
well-baked johnnycake (fed twice daily, all that the chicks would eat) made as
follows: corn meal, 4 pounds; infertile eggs, 1} pounds (1 dozen); sour milk,
2 pounds; baking soda, 5 level teaspoons; grain in litter two or three times
daily, bran in separate dish.
One to three weeks: Johnnycake and grain as above; bran, 8 pounds, beef
scraps, 2 pounds, in place of clear bran.
Three to six weeks: Grain as above; one feed of johnnycake daily. During
the early part of the period the johnnycake was mixed with equal parts of the
cracked grain; gradually the cake was discontinued, and in place of the bran
and beef scrap dry mash was given: corn meal, 100 pounds; wheat middlings,
100 pounds; beef scrap, 100 pounds; wheat bran, 200 pounds; fed in hop-
pers always accessible. Green food was available at all times. ;
25. After the sixth week chicks given the above ration were changed to the
following fattening ration: a mixture of ground hulled oats, 1 part (by weight) ;
corn meal, I part; ground buckwheat, 1 part; moistened with sour milk and
fed twice daily. Grain in litter (one feeding daily), cracked hulled oats,
I part; cracked corn, 1 part; cracked wheat, 1 part. Grit and beef scrap fed
in hoppers.
Ration 24 was the most satisfactory of seven rations compared for the
period, the others being (a) cracked grain and bran; (4) cracked grain; (c)
cracked grain and dry mash; (@) dry mash; (e) and (7) wet mash. It is an
excellent ration, but as good results are usually obtained on a simpler system
without the changes afcording to age. The ration given from one to three
weeks would probably have given as good or better results not only for the
first six-weeks period but also through the second six-weeks period, when the
fattening ration 25 was used. The report says that the chicks started on
ration 24 did not like the change, though some of the others on poorer rations
during the earlier period ate the fattening ration readily. Ration 24 is a very
good standard ration, adapted to all ordinary purposes in feeding and quite as
effective when simplified, as for the first to the third week. As fed during the
last three weeks it could readily be changed to a moist mash ration by wetting
the ground grains and feeding the beef scrap separately, or by reducing the
scrap to about thirty or forty pounds.
26. Experimental rations for laying hens (pullet year).
(2) Grain mixtures as follows (parts by weight):
July 28 to Sept. 8.— 1 cracked corn, 1 wheat, 1 oats
Sept. 9 to Dec. 8.—3 cracked corn, 4 wheat, I oats
Dec. 9g to Jan. 18.—4 cracked corn, 3 wheat, I oats
Jan. 19 to Feb. 16.— 3 cracked corn, 3 wheat, 1 oats, 1 buckwheat
Feb. 17 to July 27.— 4 cracked corn, 3 wheat, I oats
1 Bulletin No. 249, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station.
232 POULTRY CULTURE
Mash:
Parts by
weight
Corn meal x 2
Wheat middlings . 2
Wheat bran I
Beef scrap : 2
Alfalfa meal. . I
Grain fed morning and evening in litter. Mash fed wet at noon.
(4) Same as (a) except mash fed dry in hoppers.
(c) The same grain mixture as (a) and (4) morning, noon, and night in litter,
and beef scrap in hoppers.
(2) The same grain mixture as (a), (4), and (c) in hoppers, and beef scrap
in hoppers.
All lots were given mangels and green cut bone at intervals while closely
confined.
The pullets (White Leghorns) in this experiment were also under observa-
tion for data on other points than relation of ration to egg production, and were
subject to some conditions unfavorable to egg production, and so gave a rela-
tively low egg yield (averages: (a), 121.4; (4), 129.3; (6), [10.73 (@), 107.5);
but as conditions were uniform, and the stock selected to make the different
lots strictly comparable, the results are valuable to the student of poultry feed-
ing. It is at once noted that the highest and the lowest egg yield came from
hopper-fed hens; but the high yield came from the lot that, with grain in litter
(for exercise), had a rich dry mash accessible at all times, insuring full feeding
and the working off of any surplus of concentrated food, while the low egg yield
came from a lot kept through a year with only such exercise as full-fed hens
would take without compulsion. With hens of another type a much lower
egg yield and higher mortality would result from the use of ration (¢). Both
(a) and (4) are heavy forcing rations, as they were designed to be; but (4),
though carrying a dangerous percentage of beef scrap, gave (conditions con-
sidered) good results, while (z) gave lower results in egg production, and ex-
traordinary mortality, due to the high percentage of beef scrap in a wet mash.
The tendency of the bird to balance its ration and to limit the quantities of
concentrated food taken is shown in a comparison of the relative proportions
of mash and grain eaten in rations (2) and (4). The hens fed on the wet mash ate
a smaller proportion of mash and a larger proportion of hard grain than those
fed dry mash, appetite warning them against the dangerous food. The con-
sumption of grit and shell in connection with these rations affords some inter-
esting data bearing on the question of the use of grit and the attitude of the
birds toward grit. The hens fed on ration (¢) consumed more than twice as
much grit as those fed on (4) and (@). The hens fed on (@) consumed about
40 per cent more grit than those fed on (4) and (@), The hens fed on (c) con-
sumed from one fourth to one third more shell than those fed on the other
rations, and consumed nearly egual amounts of shell and grit. The differ-
ences in consumption of grit between (4) and (@), and in consumption of shell
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 233
between (a), (4), and (2) are insignificant. The large consumption of grit by those
fed on (a) — that is, hens among which mortality was high, owing to faulty mash
—is in accord with what has often been observed. The large and equal con-
sumption of grit and shell by the hens fed on ration (c) is significant. Grit, shell,
and meat scraps were given them in hoppers. For everything else they had to
scratch. There is a question as to whether the grit and shell were all consumed
or a considerable part merely pulled out of the hoppers, as hens are often seen
to do in expectation of finding something more palatable among the contents
of the hopper.
27. Cratefattening rations. (a) To make yellow flesh : corn meal, 3 parts ;
red-dog flour, 3 part, mixed with milk to consistency of cement. (6) For white
Jiesh . pearl oat dust, 2 parts; buckwheat flour, 2 parts; barley meal, 1 part;
white corn meal, 1 part, mixed with milk.
When color of flesh is immaterial, crate fatteners use, as one says, “ almost
anything we can mix.” The proportions of ingredients are of less importance
than the consistency of the food. Many mix the food some hours before feed-.
ing, in order that fermentation may begin before the birds eat it, and so the
process of digestion be advanced.
RATIONS FOR TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, AND PHEASANTS
All gallinaceous birds in domestication may be fed on the same rations as
chickens and fowls on range, the number and times of feeding and the quan-
tities of food being adapted to the habits of the birds and to the conditions.
The young of these other kinds are commonly considered more difficult to
feed and to grow than chickens. This is true only so far as concerns growing
them under like conditions. Fowls, as we have seen, are, generally speaking,
thoroughly domesticated, which accounts in part for the fact that the others
are not; for as far as fowls, ducks, and geese preémpt foraging ground near
the homestead and its outbuildings, they force the less domestic poultry to
range farther away and in a measure prevent their complete domestication.
Instances of all the other gallinaceous poultry becoming as tame as many
fowls and thriving under the same conditions are numerous enough to indi-
cate that if they could get, in close contact with man, the range conditions that
they prefer or need, they would ultimately become very tame. It may reasonably
be assumed that under such conditions they would gradually become as well
adapted to conditions of life in closer contact with man as do fowls, ducks, and
geese. Under existing conditions it is, on the whole, of advantage to man
that several valuable kinds of poultry prefer to live a little aloof from the
others and from him, and so utilize food and give such service as they may on
land outside the range of the others.
Given conditions adapted to their dispositions and habits of life, the feeding
of these birds does not differ at all from the. feeding of fowls under similar
conditions. Given conditions which fret them, and feeding them becomes dif-
ficult, — a matter of delicacies and dieting, — not because the ordinary food is
234 POULTRY CULTURE
unsuitable to them under normal conditions, but because of the sympathetic rela-
tion between the nervous and digestive systems. It does not appear that their
digestive organs are originally and normally less robust than those of fowls, but
it is plain that in general their nervous systems are more sensitive, and most
sensitive in infancy, when every part of the organism is most susceptible. For
that reason the poultry keeper who grows these birds must cater more to their
natural habits. When he does this, and arranges the feeding accordingly, it is
found that the same foods may be used for all, and that there is no more need
of special diets for the young of each of these rarer kinds of poultry than for
young chickens.
28. For turkeys on farm range. For the young poults, coarsely ground
corn mixed with milk (sweet or sour) or baked in a cake and moistened with
milk. This is gradually mixed with cracked corn until, when the poults are
about eight weeks old, cracked corn is given clear. Through the summer they
are fed on this twice a day. In the fall they are fattened on whole corn, fed
two or three times a day.
This is the method of many growers in the turkey-growing district in Rhode
Island and Connecticut. Some growers feed to both young and old one feed
daily of dough or mash, as fed to fowls and other poultry. Compare this
with ration 1. The success of this method shows that with suitable foraging
conditions all that is needed to supplement the natural ration is what heavy
grain (corn) they will eat. When range is good, many growers do not feed at all
through the season when insects, especially grasshoppers, are most abundant.
The fattening of turkeys in the late fall depends largely upon the weather. If the
weather is seasonable, — that is, quite cool in northerly latitudes, — less insect
and vegetable foods are to be secured by foraging, the appetite for heavy food
is also keener, and the turkeys eat corn freely and fatten well. If the weather
is warm there is more food available on the range, the appetite is not so sharp,
they will not eat corn so freely, and it may not be possible to fatten them as
much as desired. Turkeys do not fatten well in confinement. Some of the
fattening plants in New England have tried fattening them in large flocks, like
geese, but results have not been satisfactory. It is not necessary to multiply
examples of turkey rations. Any of the rations given to fowls and chickens
on range may be successfully used for turkeys on range.
for peafowls. In size and habit these birds are very similar to turkeys, and
may be reared in the same way, Usually they are found in much smaller
flocks, a male and one or two females with their young. They forage widely,
as turkeys do, and small flocks on good range are self-sustaining except in
winter.
For guineas. In the conditions in which they are usually grown, guineas
need little attention. They may be fed just the same as fowls and chicks on
range. They prefer to keep away from other poultry much of the time, but
when they come among fowls, they are very domineering.
For pheasants, For a long time pheasants were considered especially deli-
cate, requiring special feeding until well grown. The most successful growers in
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 235
America to-day feed them about the same as chickens. The prepared chick-
food mixtures are used for them with very satisfactory results. The half-wild
pheasants protected in the woods in some of the states often come to the farms
for food, especially in winter, when they sometimes take up their quarters
with the fowls. At planting time, too, they sometimes become quite as tame
as fowls.
for ostriches. In South Africa, where ostrich farming is carried on more
extensively then in America, the most approved method of feeding is to pasture
the birds on alfalfa, supplementing this with occasional feeds of corn. For win-
ter feeding, or when pasture is short, hay, mangels, turnips, melons, etc. are used.
In feeding habits, ostriches resemble geese.(on land) more than they do any other
poultry.
RATIONS FOR DUCKS
29. For ducklings. Corn meal 1 part, bran 2 parts; add 5 per cent of beef
scrap and a little fine grit or coarse gravel; give an occasional feed of vege-
tables or green food: feed five times a day until five weeks old, then three
times a day. Fatten on this, feeding all that the birds will eat.
This is practically an irregular alternation of standard rations 2 and 3. It
is the ration used by one of the most successful of the smaller duck growers
of New England. On comparison of reports it appears to have been as good
a ration as any of the heavier rations following. One of the largest duck
growers on Long Island used for years this ration slightly modified by add-
ing small proportions of ground oats, middlings, or anything available. Such
additions to a simple standard ration vary the flavor, make it more appetizing,
induce the birds to eat more heartily, and (probably) add somewhat to its nutri-
tive quality. When such a ration is fed to ducklings intended to be marketed
at about ten weeks, and kept closely confined, the necessary variation for those
to be grown for stock purposes is made, without altering the proportions of
the ration given, by simply putting the birds on pasture.
30. James Rankin’s duck rations. First food for ducklings, corn meal, I
part; bran, 4 parts; low-grade flour to hold together, 5 per cent of grit or coarse
sand; about the third day, add a little beef scrap and (cut) green rye; feed five
times a day for a few weeks; after that feed three times daily and gradually
substitute meal for bran, until at eight weeks the ration is three fourths meal
and the beef scrap increased to 10 per cent or more. Describing his fattening
ration separately, Mr. Rankin has given it as corn meal, 3 parts; low-grade
flour, I part; beef scrap, 3 part; green stuff, 1 part; fed three times a day, from
the eighth to the eleventh week.
Compared with ration 29 this is a lighter ration at the beginning and a
heavier toward the finish of the period of making green ducks. In remarks
on ration 29 it was said that it appeared to give as good results as the heavier
rations. Results by rations 29 and 30 were practically the same. The infer-
ence is that the flour used in ration 30 at first was sufficient to supply much
of the deficiency in meal, and that when more meal was added, growth and
236 POULTRY CULTURE
fattening were accelerated, and so results of the two rations for the full period
were equalized.
31. For stock ducks (in autumn and early winter). About equal parts of
corn meal, wheat bran, and boiled vegetables, with ro per cent of beef scrap,
fed morning and evening; at noon a little cracked corn, wheat, or oats. After
the birds begin laying, increase the proportions of meal and scrap and add low-
grade flour, making mash about as follows: meal, 1 part; bran, 1 part; low-
grade flour, 1 part; vegetables, 1 part, with from 12 to 15 per cent beef scrap.
This is practically a standard ration until the ducks are laying, then a very
heavy ration to keep up condition under the drain of laying. Ducks lay almost
daily from about January first until about midsummer.
32. Weber Brothers’ rations. For the first three weeks, corn meal, I part;
bran, 1 part; low-grade flour, 1 part; dry bread (ground) and rolled oats, 1 part;
add 5 per cent of beef scrap, a little grit, and a little cut clover or alfalfa or other
cut green rye. Mix this dry, then moisten with water and mix to a doughy con-
sistency. Feed five times a day. Water at each feeding. From the third to the
eighth week the above ration is modified to corn meal, 1 part; bran, 1 part;
low-grade flour, 4 part; green stuff, } part; beef scrap, 1 per cent; fed at first
four times, then three times, a day. From the eighth to the eleventh week, duck-
lings for market are fattened on corn meal, 3 parts; low-grade flour, 1 part;
beef scrap, # part; about 3 per cent of oyster shells and grit, with occasionally
a little green stuff. Those saved for breeders are fed corn meal, 3 parts; bran,
3 parts; low-grade flour, 2 parts; beef scrap, 1 part; (root) vegetables, 1 part;
green stuff, 1 part, with about 1 per cent of grit, and a little salt; about once a
week I per cent of ground charcoal is added. The mash is fed morning and
evening, about 4 quarts to every 10 large ducks, and when ducks are laying
heavily, they are given at noon about 1 pint cracked corn to every 10 ducks.
The ration as used for the youngest ducks contains a greater variety of
ingredients, because these growers could get only limited quantities of stale
bread and of rolled oats at prices which made them economical foods, and it
was judged best to use these for the youngest ducklings. The regular use of
grit and shell was necessary with the ration as fed after the eighth week,
because of the small proportion of bran. Whether it is better to omit bran and
use grit and shell is doubtful. The period in which this ration was used is not
long enough to fully develop results of feeding it. The ration fed to stock
birds is heavier than the standard rations given.
While it is customary to feed young ducks five or six times a day for the
first few weeks, it is not certain that there is any advantage in feeding more
than three times, except when the ducklings get no feed but what is given.
Ducklings on grass in spring and summer will come on as fast on three meals
of mash as on five, and will be stronger. For rapid forcing, young ducks may
be fed meat much more heavily than in any of these rations. They will stand
for a while a ration nearly one third beef scrap. Whether that is a profitable
ration has not been fully demonstrated. In feeding small flocks of ducks (up to
two or three hundred) the author has not found it necessary to give grit
RATIONS AND METHODS OF FEEDING 237
and shell continuously. In fact, he has never found it necessary except with a
few feeds at first, and thereafter at rare intervals if ducks showed symptoms
of leg weakness.
RATIONS FOR GEESE
33. Ration for goslings (on pasture). First day, grass only; after that, two
or three feeds daily of mash or scalded cracked corn. If confined to grassless
yard or on tough grass which they do not relish, feed, with several grain foods
daily, all the succulent green food that they will eat.
This ration as given for birds on pasture is that used in the goose-growing
section of Rhode Island. Compare it with ration 1 for chicks and ration 28
for young turkeys.
34. attening rations for goslings. After six weeks, feed corn meal, 1 part;
bran, I part, all that the birds will eat, three times a day. For geese reared on
pasture, with light feeding of grain until three or four months old, goose
fatteners use a mash of all corn meal, feeding this for four or five weeks.
35. Ration for breeding geese (on pasture). One or two light feeds of grain,
or a feed of mash and one of grain daily. When pasture is not available, feed
one mash and one grain feed daily, and supply liberally with vegetables and
green stuff.
There is essentially no difference between such rations and those used for
fowls, ducks, and turkeys. In every case the feeder supplies approximately a
common standard grain ration, with a little animal food and some green food.
The birds balance their own rations, as far as quantities permit. Unless the
food supply is very deficient in some kind of food, they keep in good (if
not perfect) condition, and soon get in condition after they begin laying. In
grazing, geese (even more than fowls and ducks) will take the roots of grass
and many plants after the supply of tops is exhausted.
36. Swans may be fed the same as geese. Being grown in small numbers
on ponds and lakes, they are usually left much to themselves. They secure
food from the water, being very destructive of small fish and other creatures
found in the water. When such supplies of food are insufficient they may be
fed grain mashes or stale bread, a most convenient food for them in many cases.
CHAPTER XIV
INCUBATION
Incubation the beginning and the end of the common cycle of
operations in poultry culture. By incubation the bird is produced
from the egg. For incubation and the perpetuation of its kind the
bird, according to its sex, produces eggs or contributes to their fer-
tilization ; and then, in birds of the air, both male and female take
part in the incubating of the eggs, the substance of which has been
furnished almost wholly by the female. With poultry in domesti-
cation, as shown in Chapter I, the male has no part in incubation,
and the female may often be relieved of it to the very great
economic advantage of man; but, whatever the attitude of the
poultryman toward the process, incubation is one of his most per-
plexing problems, affecting and affected by many other important
problems, and seldom presenting itself in the same form twice in
succession. From the nature of the subject its proper place in a sys-
tematic study of poultry culture is doubtful. Equally good reasons
may be given for beginning and for concluding a detailed descrip-
tion of a generation of birds with the subject of incubation. But,
considering the close analogy between the egg of an oviparous
creature and the seed of a plant, it seems most natural and appro-
priate to begin a practical study of those details with the egg con-
sidered simply as material for the purpose, and without regard to
either its antecedents or its possibilities beyond the mere produc-
tion of an organism of the kind which produced it.
The egg. Considered from the point of view just indicated, an
egg consists of four parts :
1. A germ, which is the true egg.
2. A mass of albumin (the white of the egg), — nitrogenous
matter which the germ, quickened into life, will, as it grows, appro-
priate to form the substance of the embryonic being.
3. A supply of food (the yo/é of the egg) for the first nourish-
ment of the young bird after exclusion.
238
INCUBATION 239
4. A protective covering which is composed of a double mem-
brane within a hard shell.
The germ may be seen, when the egg is broken, as a little white
speck on the yolk, and always on the upper side of the yolk, which
position it keeps because the yolk is suspended in the white by two
albuminous strings, and in whatever position the egg may lie, the
yolk turns, bringing the germ to the upper side.
Note. An egg as described may be produced by the female bird without
association with the male. In the ordinary natural course the female on arriv-
ing at maturity (or at the breeding season) produces eggs which are complete
for commercial purposes and also, as far as her contribution to the egg goes,
for breeding purposes; but the egg will not hatch unless the germ furnished
by the female has been fertilized by union with the sperm contributed by the
male at the proper stage of its development, nor will the germ thus fertilized
produce a creature of sufficient vitality for normal development if the germinal
elements contributed by the parents are lacking in vitality. Just how far a
superabundance of vitality contributed by one parent may compensate for a de-
ficiency in vitality in the contribution of the other is not known. That there is
a tendency to equalization is often apparent, yet it is just as evident that there
must be a certain degree of initial vitality in an element before it can unite
with its opposite sexual element for the production of a new organism. This is
illustrated best in the case of those hens of great laying capacity which produce
few or no chicks, their eggs rarely becoming fertile even with every oppor-
tunity to do so. The fact that a hen can produce, in extraordinary numbers,
eggs each of which apparently furnishes the material for a chick, though the
accompanying germ lacks the vitality which would enable it under proper con-
ditions to utilize that material, indicates that capacity to transmit vitality is more
restricted than capacity to produce material for the building of new organisms.
Of like significance in this connection is the fact that, though the male’s contri-
bution to the egg is but a minute quantity of sperm, the capacity of the average
male to “strongly fertilize” eggs is plainly limited. These points are considered
more fully in the chapters relating to breeding. Mention is made of them here
to show that, in the nature of the case, the ordinary lot of eggs used for incu-
bation is unlikely to be high in “ hatchability,” — which fact must be given due
consideration in every effort to estimate causes of unsatisfactory hatches.
A fertile egg. Technically, a fertile egg is an egg which has
fertilized germs possessed of sufficient vitality to develop so far
that development can be seen through the shell when the egg, after
having been incubated for a time, is tested by being held before
a light in the usual way. Fertility cannot be determined without
incubation. The amount of incubation necessary to show whether
240 POULTRY CULTURE
an egg is fertile varies with the vitality of the germ, the color and
texture of the shell of the egg, and the intensity of the light
before which it is observed. A thin-shelled white egg in a strong
light may show fertility inside of twenty-four hours. A dark-shelled
egg, weak in fertility, tested in a poor light, may appear doubtful
after a week of incubation. Ordinarily tests made at the fifth to the
seventh day give an experienced operator reliable indications of
the fertility and vitality of eggs that have been incubated under
proper conditions. Though not invariable, it is the general rule
that the fertility of eggs from a mating is quite constant through
a season; so that when the degree of fertility of eggs from a
pen, flock, or stock is once found, it is likely to be maintained for
some time.
As a rule, fertility and vitality reach their highest point of com-
bination at the natural hatching season. Fertility is lowest and
vitality highest in advance of this season, and fertility highest
and vitality lowest after it; but numerous special cases furnish
exceptions to these general conditions. Fertile, hatchable eggs are
the prime factor in incubation, and a knowledge of the hatching
properties of the eggs used is absolutely necessary for intelligent
judgment of other factors when hatches are unsatisfactory. Self-
evident as this seems when stated, a great deal of work in incuba-
tion is done without this basic knowledge, the operator working quite
in the dark. Detailed instructions as to determination of fertility
are given in the paragraphs relating to the operation of incubators.
Heat the energetic factor in incubation. Given a hatchable
egg, the continuous application of a proper degree of heat for
a definite period of time, varying in different kinds of birds, will
produce an embryonic bird which, when it has attained the fullest
possible development within the shell, will break the shell and
emerge from it. In nature the heat for incubation is usually applied
by the bird which laid the egg, relieved at intervals, perhaps, by
its mate. In artificial incubation, oil, coal, gas, and electricity are
used. The source of heat, however, is immaterial. All that is neces-
sary is that the proper degree of heat be continuously maintained
(not absolutely, but approximately) for the required time, under such
circumstances that atmospheric conditions affecting the develop-
ment of the embryo within the egg will not be markedly unfavorable.
INCUBATION 241
The fact that, in natural incubation, eggs seem to hatch equally
well under very different atmospheric conditions indicates that as
close adjustments of ventilation and moisture as of heat are not
required, — that within limits (not definitely ascertained) these
may vary considerably without materially affecting the hatch. The
normal temperature of fowls is about 106°, of other poultry about
the same. The temperature in natural incubation, therefore, would
be a few degrees lower, or the temperature at which eggs could be
kept with a body at about 106°, applying heat from one side only.
The usual temperature of eggs under hens has been found to be
from 102° to 104°, with a mean of 103°.
Antiquity of artificial methods. Artificial incubation has been
practiced by the Egyptians and Chinese for some thousands of
years. As developed by these peoples the appliances are crude
and the success of the process depends largely upon the judgment,
skill, and careful attention of the operator. Knowledge of the art
is confined principally to families in which it has been handed
down from generation to generation. Operations are on an ex-
tensive scale, and the operator remains with, and sometimes in,
the “incubator ’”’ continuously throughout a period of incubation.
Modern artificial incubation as developed in America and Europe
is on different lines. The constant effort of the occidental inventor
has been to devise an incubator that might be operated by any one
anywhere, on any desired scale, and with the least possible per-
sonal attention.
The problem in artificial incubation. To maintain a temperature
of approximately 103°, with suitable atmospheric conditions, — to
duplicate, as nearly as possible, in an artificially heated chamber,
the conditions to which an egg incubated by a bird is subjected, —
is the incubator operator’s problem. This problem presents two
phases. The first of these, the designing and construction of in-
cubators, is a matter for the inventor and manufacturer, and does
not directly interest the ordinary student.
The individual poultryman’s problem in artificial incubation
is to take a ‘‘machine” which, when properly attended, is self-
regulating for heat, give it the attention requisite for this, and
adapt ventilation and moisture to local atmospheric conditions.
To reduce to the minimum the variations in these conditions, the
242 POULTRY CULTURE
incubator is usually placed in a basement room or ina cellar. Under
the most skillful management, results in artificial incubation are
likely to be more variable than when eggs of like hatching quality
are incubated with equal care by natural methods, because the judg-
ment of a man guided by experience and observation works less
accurately in such matters than the inclination of the bird guided
by instinct and sensation.
Experience and skill count in the operation of incubators, as in
all things, but the incubator operator has a slightly different prob-
lem in every machine that he uses, and a new problem in every
hatch, and a high degree of efficiency in this line of work is only
attained by careful study of the behavior of machines in the posi-
tions in which they are placed, and by such close attention to the
lamp, or other source of heat, that the eggs are never subjected
to injurious temperatures.
Value of both methods of incubation. When incubators were
perfected to the point where temperature was easily controlled,
there was a general tendency to substitute the artificial for the
natural method. As it became generally known that, notwithstand-
ing the progress made, the artificial hatchers had their faults and
limitations, and still required close attention on the part of the
operator, this tendency was checked. It is now generally recog-
nized that the natural method is the better method for the great
majority of poultry keepers, provided they can get birds to incu-
bate when they need them, but that whenever the natural method
is for any reason inadequate, the artificial hatcher must be used.
On this principle one or more incubators (of suitable capacity) and
the necessary brooders become a part of the equipment of most
poultry keepers, to be used in emergencies and for special purposes,
even though hatching is done mostly by the natural method ; and
whenever operations are on a large scale, incubators are relied upon
to do the hatching, the only important exception to this being in
the colony poultry-farming section of Rhode Island.
Hatcuine py Natura MeEtuops
Broodiness. The inclination to incubate is a normal character
in birds, which in some races and stocks has wholly or partly dis-
appeared. The length of the period of laying, before broodiness,
INCUBATION 243
varies greatly. Some hens will become broody after laying only
six or seven eggs. Usually hens of stock strongly inclined to
broodiness will lay from one to two dozen eggs before becoming
broody. In strains or stocks in which the broody habit is present,
but not strongly established, hens often lay for two, three, or even
five or six months without becoming broody. As a rule, increased
egg production is accompanied by decrease in broodiness. Among
ducks the Pekin and Indian Runner are mostly nonsitters. In geese,
turkeys, and the less common kinds of poultry broodiness is general.
Broodiness is shown first in the inclination of the bird to re-
main on the nest after laying, then by a change of attitude toward
the keeper, and by a change of voice. Usually birds, unless very
tame, are shy about being approached on the nest, and leave it if
molested. The broody bird in most cases becomes bold, sometimes
vicious, and even if she will not allow herself to be handled on the
nest, will plainly show as much anger as fear when molested. Hens
and other gallinaceous poultry, when broody, make a clucking
noise, which is obviously meant to guide the young and keep them
from scattering too widely, and when disturbed give a harsh, warn-
ing cry. Female waterfowl, when broody, give a warning hiss, as
the male is likely to do at any time when molested. The attitude
and voice of the bird are surer indications of broodiness than her
remaining on the nest, for sick birds frequently do that.
When broody hens are to be used for incubating, it is advisable
to let them remain for several days on the nests that they have laid
in, until broodiness becomes confirmed and they have ceased lay-
ing. The duration of broodiness is not (as is popularly supposed)
determined or influenced by the time required to incubate the eggs
of the bird. Unless broodiness is interrupted by a resumption of
egg production, or she is compelled by exhaustion to leave the
nest, a bird will remain on eggs until young appear, and may even
keep for an indefinite time to a nest containing no eggs.
System in natural incubation. If more than two or three birds
of any kind are set, arrangements for managing them should be
systematized. A great deal of the dissatisfaction with natural
methods of incubation is due to mismanagement. The sitting
hens should always be separated from the rest of the flock and
made as secure as possible from disturbing influences of all kinds ;
244 POULTRY CULTURE
yet they should be in a place convenient for the attendant to have
oversight of them as he goes about his regular work. Most hens
may be moved from their laying nests to any desired place, if moved
—, after dark ; many may be moved
4) at any time. But the other kinds
of poultry usually resent interfer-
ence of this kind, and will incu-
bate only in the nests in which
they have been laying. For this
reason it is customary, especially
with turkeys and geese, before
the birds begin to lay, to place,
in locations attractive to them,
Fic. 273. End of long row of nests for nests inet snl, be suitable for
sitting hens them during incubation. An
empty barrel placed on its side
in some partly secluded place is often used for both turkeys and
geese. When the birds insist on making nests for themselves
the careful keeper furnishes protection (see illustrations, p. 247)
and, as far as the birds will toler- i 5 TSE
ate it, tries to make them secure
from molestation.
From the greater ease of con-
trolling fowls, and because the
larger kinds of poultry lay com-
paratively few eggs even when
not allowed to incubate those
produced during their first lay-
ing period, by far the greater
number of eggs of all kinds of Fic. 274. Half-barrel nests for sitting
poultry hatched by natural meth- hens, out of doors.- (Photograph from
ods are hatched under hens. cumsen 4
Nests for sitting hens. Nest boxes should be uniform in pattern
and size, and should be so constructed that they may be opened
and closed at will, thus insuring control of the hens. Where the
number to be set is not large, nests of the pattern shown in Fig. 275
may be used. When large numbers are set it is better to have them
made in sections of four and arranged in tiers or banks three or four
INCUBATION 245
sections high. When nests are placed on the ground the earth bot-
tom should be shaped before putting into it the nest material, partic-
ular care being taken to remove any small stones that it may contain.
For nest material. Short, fine hay or straw is preferred for nest
material, but fine shavings or excelsior may be used. Some poultry
keepers use tobacco stems, which are objectionable to lice. What-
ever material is used should be
shaped and well pressed down
by hand. If this is carelessly
done, eggs are likely to be
a a broken, and the hen blamed for
Fic. 275. Nest boxes, made in pairs, for What was none of her fault.
sitting hens. Inside dimensions: large, Those who have had no expe-
16" X 10" X 18%} small, 12° X 12° X 15” tience or have been unsuccess-
ful in shaping nests will find it a good plan, after doing their best,
to put a few china eggs into the nest and let the hen shape it as
she sits on these for a day or two.
Selection of eggs. Eggs to be incubated should be selected with
care, all that are irregular in shape, defective in shell, or abnormal
in size being discarded. Leaving out of consideration all other ob-
jections to the use of such eggs for hatching, their liability to break
is sufficient reason for not using them. The eggs should be as
fresh as possible, and should be clean. Eggs three weeks old
when set may hatch well, but
the young birds are likely to be
much less vigorous than those
from fresh eggs. Little differ-
ence is noted between chicks
from eggs ten days or two Fic. 276. Same as Fig. 275, with nest
Bi boxes closed
weeks old when set, but it is
the general opinion that the fresher eggs produce somewhat better
young. Hatches reported from eggs’ kept six weeks or more are
not well authenticated.
Eggs kept for hatching should not be exposed to either ex-
treme cold or extreme heat. The best temperature is from 40° to
50° F. It makes no appreciable difference in what position they are
placed, nor is it necessary to turn them at intervals; the position
does not affect eggs held only a week or two. It is not advisable
246 POULTRY CULTURE
to put under the same hen the eggs of birds of different kinds or
distinctly different types, but it is often advisable to place in the
same nest eggs from different flocks, yards, or individual hens,
especially if the hatching qualities of some of the matings are
known, and it is desired to determine whether, in case of failure
of other eggs to hatch, the fault is in the eggs or in incubation.
For such purposes eggs must be marked. In general it is desirable
that all eggs used for incubation be marked, or that the nests be
marked to identify eggs set in them.
Number of eggs placed in a nest. The number of eggs ina setting
varies according to the size of the bird, the kind of eggs, and the
season. A medium-sized hen can cover from 9g to 15 hens’ eggs,
— usually (of average eggs) II in winter, 13 in early spring, and
15 after the weather is settled. The same hen would cover 6 or 7
turkey eggs, from 9 to 11 duck eggs, or 4 or 5 goose eggs. A duck
will cover about the same number of duck eggs as a hen of like
weight. Geese and turkeys cover from 12 to 15 of their own eggs.
In warm weather much larger numbers of eggs may be given and
large hatches secured,! but because of the risk of the entire hatch
being spoiled by a sudden ‘cold’ snap, big sittings are rarely made
except from curiosity. Bantams laying eggs larger for their size
than the large fowls will cover only from 7 to 9 of their own eggs,
and about the same number of the eggs of pheasants.
Advantages of keeping hens shut on the nests. Except when
they are let off to eat and drink, the nests of sitting hens should
be kept closed. This is necessary, not so much on account of the
individual hen that may leave her nest too long, as to prevent
interference and quarreling, with the breakage of eggs and the
general disturbance that such incidents occasion. If any are rest-
less they may be kept quiet by darkening the nests with burlap
curtains, either over the nest or on the windows. Hens that will
not settle down in a darkened room or nest should be discarded.
When only a few hens are set in nests on the ground, and it is
desired to manage them with as little interference as possible, they
may be let out to feed singly or in pairs, and left to return to the
nests of their own accord. When large numbers are set in the same
1T have seen a little native hen weighing less than 4 pounds hatch 19 chicks
from 19 eggs. A Brahma hen set on 27 Leghorn eggs hatched 21 chicks.
INCUBATION 247
place it is better to let all out at the same
time, preferably late in the afternoon, and
as soon as they have had feed and drink,
return them at random to the nests. The
largest average hatches are obtained by not
letting hens return regularly to the same
nests. One reason for this is that hens dif-
fer in temperature, and some are so low in
temperature that, if they sit on the same
; eggs continuously, they will hatch no chicks,
Fic. 277. Turkey’s nestin or weak chicks. It is possible also that some
cleft rock, covered with hens do not move their eggs as much as nec-
loose boards for protection
essary. It has often
been noted that hens that sit closely and are
always quiet and in the same position on the
nest do not bring off as good hatches as the
more energetic and restless hens.
While the hens are feeding, nests should
be examined for broken or soiled eggs, and
attention given to any that are not in order.
Some poultrymen, hatching on a large scale,
by natural methods, make banks of nests |
with an alley in the rear and with access to te
the nests from the back as well as from the Fic. 278. Turkey’s nest
front. When the hens are let off to feed, “' ee sane
the keeper closes the r
fronts of all the nests and, going into the
alley, can clean the nests, or give other at-
tention, without interfering with the hens or
being annoyed by them.
Whatever arrangement or system of han-
dling sitting hens is used, they should be re-
leased to eat and drink at about the same
time each day, and at that time nests and
eggs soiled by broken eggs or by dung should
be cleaned, for there is nothing more detri-
mental to incubation than fouled eggs and
Fic. 279. Box with one
end cut out, covering nest x
of goose in pasture nests. This trouble may be reduced to the
248 POULTRY CULTURE
minimum by good judgment in the selection of the hens and eggs
used, by care in making the nests, and by regularity in attention ;
but under the best of conditions there will be some breakage, and
occasionally a hen unable to retain her feces through twenty-four
hours will soil her eggs and nest.
Food of the sitting hen. Only hard grain should be fed to sitting
hens. Whole corn seems to suit them best, but any of the ordinary
grains may be given. Soft foods and wet mashes, which tend to
cause looseness of the bowels, should be avoided, but a little green
food may be given as a relish. The grain should be in a hopper,
trough, or box, and fresh water should be supplied daily.
Cleanliness. During incubation, and especially if the birds are
confined to indoor quarters, as they usually must be early in the
season, and as may be most convenient at any time, cleanliness is
of the utmost importance. The droppings of the incubating birds
are likely to have an unusually offensive odor,! and if allowed to
accumulate, to dry, and to be broken up and mixed with the litter
or earth of the floor, affect the whole atmosphere of the place,
besides making an earth floor so objectionable that hens will not
wallow in it and thus keep themselves free from lice. Even when
the hens have, and avail themselves freely of, the opportunity to
dust, it is advisable to take precautions to prevent lice from getting a
start in the nests. The easiest way to do this is to dust hens and
nests with insect powder when set (or soon after), again about the
middle of the period of incubation, and a third time just before
the eggs are picked. If this is done, the birds and nests should be
almost entirely free from lice when the chicks hatch. When only
a few hens are set, and the keeper is quick to observe indications
of the presence of lice and to take steps to check them, routine
preventive treatment may be omitted. Under other circumstances
preventive measures are safest and, in the end, more economical.
Testing eggs. Eggs should be tested about the seventh day of
incubation. When the work is carefully systematized it is usual to
set hens always on the same day of the week. Then if the test on
1The extraordinary offensive odor of the droppings of sitting hens seems to be
due in part to their long retention before evacuation and in part to the tendency
of nature to take advantage of a period of rest from usual activities, to clean up the
system and rid it of impurities.
INCUBATION 249
the seventh day shows any considerable proportion of infertile, or
unhatchable, eggs, the good eggs remaining may be “ doubled up”
and a part of the hens reset with the next lot. A second test is
usually made about the fourteenth day for the detection and removal
of dead germs. It is much more important that these should be re-
moved than that the infertile eggs should be taken away, for the
composition of the infertile egg is not changed during incubation,
while the egg containing a dead germ may rapidly decompose, is
more likely to be broken than an infertile egg or one with a live
germ, and, if broken in the nest, may spoil the hatch.
The method of testing eggs in incubation is substantially the
same as the candling of market eggs, but the work is usually done
with a little more care. The ordinary incandescent electric light,
when convenient, makes a most satisfactory tester. An ordinary
hand lamp or lantern may be used, or if the place in which the
testing is to be done has a window toward the sun and can be com-
pletely darkened, the eggs may be tested by sunlight by placing
over this window a shutter, or thick curtain, having in it a hole of
suitable size (an inch in diameter, or a little larger), before which
the eggs may be passed. When an artificial light is used it may
be either placed in a small box with a suitable hole directly before
the light, or fitted with a metal chimney with a hole on one side.!
The egg to be tested is held, large end up, at the hole before the
light. A strongly fertile egg at the seventh day will appear through
the tester as in Fig. 294. An infertile egg will be clear, but the
yolk may throw a light shadow. The apparent density of the egg
will usually be in proportion to the vitality of the germ, and those
in which at this time the shadow is relatively faint and the line of
the air cell not well defined will not usually hatch. Many poultry-
men leave these doubtful eggs until the second test; but it is as
well to discard them at the first test, for the germ that does not
start well is not likely to produce a strong embryo.
The average hatchable egg, tested with an ordinary light, shows
its development only by the increasing density of the shaded por-
tion, the enlargement of the air cell, and the sharper definition of
the line between the air cell and the growing embryo. Thin-shelled
eggs, or any eggs in very strong light, may show more of the detail
1 See description, p. 171.
250 POULTRY CULTURE
of development. As eggs are usually tested with an ordinary lamp,
anything noticeable in the shaded portion (as a dark spot, ring, or
lines) indicates a dead germ, and vacillation of the lower line of the
air space shows that decomposition is well advanced. By slightly
turning the egg as held large end up before the light, the condition
of the contents may be observed; in the normally developing
fertile egg they appear solid, in the decaying egg, fluid.
Period of incubation. The time required for incubation is for
fowls, 21 days ; pheasants, from 22 to 24 days ; turkeys, peafowl, and
guineas, 28 days; ostriches, 42 days; ducks, 28 days; geese, from
30 to 35 days; swans, 35 days, — these figures giving the average
periods for different types of each kind of poultry and for normal
development. It is noticeable that for the smaller kinds of poultry
the period of incubation is generally shorter. This is true also of
different types of the same kind of poultry. The eggs of small,
active birds hatch sooner than those of the larger, more sluggish
ones. Broody birds of high temperature will (other things being
equal) hatch the same eggs sooner than will those of lower tempera-
ture. The young birds hatching long in advance of the normal
average time are likely to be precocious individuals. Those much
delayed are likely to lack vitality. As a rule, the best specimens
are those which hatch promptly after having taken the full period
for embryonic development, due allowance being made for differ-
ences in the type of the bird and in the birds incubating the eggs.
In fowls a hatch of Leghorns might be complete in twenty days ;
a hatch of Brahmas under the same conditions show not an egg
picked at that time. A difference of a day, or even two days, in
the apparent period of a hatch may occur, either through failure of
the incubating birds to sit closely on the eggs at the outset, or be-
cause of partial chilling of the eggs at a later stage of incubation.
In the first case the vitality of the young birds may not be at all
affected ; in the other they are likely to be weak.
Chilling of eggs during incubation. The chilling of eggs cannot
be wholly avoided. A bird may become sick, or perhaps die on
the nest, before its condition is discovered; and occasionally one,
though to all appearances in good health, quits sitting and stands up
in the nest. Such a case the novice may at first fail to distinguish
from the case of the bird that stands up occasionally (especially in
INCUBATION 251
hot weather) because her eggs are making her uncomfortably warm.
Unless it is known that eggs have been chilled beyond recovery,
the damage due to chilling can be ascertained only by continuing
incubation, and testing after a sufficient time has elapsed to plainly
show whether development has stopped. In cold weather, eggs left
by a bird for only ten or fifteen minutes may be fatally chilled,
while in warm weather a bird may remain off for hours at a time
without impairing the hatch. An actual chill probably always does
damage, but circumstances or superior hardiness sometimes save
the germs in some eggs. Cases have been known of vigorous
chicks hatching from eggs in nests where most of the germs were
destroyed by a chill.
When the eggs begin to hatch. The inclination of the mother is
to keep the nest until she is ready to leave it with her young. In
houses where the sitters are under control, it is well now to keep the
nests closed. The advantage of protecting an outside nest is empha-
sized at this stage. A nest cover like those shown in Figs. 278 and
279 can be completely closed by a board in front of the entrance,
and the sitting bird protected from outside interference at the time
when it is most dangerous to her brood. If she is in good condition
it will be no serious hardship for her to go without food and water
for two or three days, while if she leaves the nest, the air may dry
the membranes in pipped eggs and there is risk of her crushing
in the shells as she returns. On all accounts she should be allowed
to remain quiet. Birds that become too restless and crush their
eggs should be removed and others substituted, or (if that cannot
be done) the eggs should be taken away.
To avoid losses at this stage some poultrymen who hatch mostly
with hens transfer the eggs to incubators at about the eighteenth
day, returning the chicks to the hens when dry and ready to begin
eating. When this is not practicable, and the mother seems likely
to lose many of the young as they hatch, the eggs may be put (in
the old-fashioned way) into a flannel-lined box or basket and kept
in any safe, warm place until they hatch. The nests should be ex-
amined only to observe in a general way how things are progress-
ing, and to correct anything going wrong. As a rule, the hen that
seems to be doing well should be let alone, the hen that is not doing
well relieved of responsibility. When things are going well, all that
252 POULTRY CULTURE
is necessary is to remove the empty shells, in order to give more
room in the nest and to prevent an unhatched egg from being
“capped” by a shell.
Helping birds out of the shell. On the principle that the bird
that has not strength to get out of the shell unassisted is not worth
keeping, most experienced poultrymen consider it inadvisable to
help them out. Few, however, rigidly follow this rule. Espe-
cially in hatching by natural methods, where the eggs are easy to
get at, the attendant is likely to help out of the shell every chick
that seems to need help,
and discard the weak-
lings later, when re-
moving the chicks from
the nests. This saves
the chick that is held
in the shell by some-
thing else than lack of
strength to make its
way out under normal
conditions. Such cases
occur when the mem-
branes dry as the chick
picks around the shell,
% fe and when the chick
Fic. 280. Hen with brood of newly hatched chicks 18 “mispresented” and
picks at the small in-
stead of the large end of the egg. If the drying of membranes as
eggs are picked is general, it is a good plan to moisten the nest with
tepid water, and also, if conditions are very bad, to sprinkle the floor
of the apartment liberally. Except in such circumstances, it is not
necessary to moisten eggs in process of incubation by the natural
method. In removing the shell from a chick which seems to need
help, the condition of the blood vessels in the membrane should
be noted. While the blood still circulates in them, nothing should
be done. The chick will be injured or killed by the bleeding that
would follow the removal of shell and membrane.
Conditions of good hatching. Success in hatching by natural
methods depends on constant and careful attention to every detail
INCUBATION 253
that may affect results. While the natural method is the only
one available for those who cannot give an incubator as close
attention as its heater requires, the poultry keeper who leaves sit-
ting birds to themselves is taking chances. Under favorable con-
ditions a single bird sitting by itself may make a good hatch. A
few birds may do as well if they get along amicably, but good or
even fair hatches are exceptional under such circumstances. As a
rule, good results by natural methods are secured only by careful
selection of eggs and sitters, careful preparation of nests, regular
attention to the wants of the birds, and prompt correction of any
condition unfavorably affecting either the germs in the eggs or the
mothers at hatching time. The natural method of incubation, at
its season and in its place, is the more economical method, and
taxes the thought of the operator less than the other, but to get
full results from it the operator must do his part as faithfully as he
expects his birds to do theirs.
HatcHING By ARTIFICIAL METHODS
Responsibility of the operator. The modern incubator is a clev-
erly designed, serviceable mechanism, but it has its limitations. Many
of the troubles of incubator operators are due to overestimates of
the automatic capacity of incubators, and to the consequent neglect
of things to which the operator should give his personal attention.
The most successful operators are those who watch their incubators
very closely, quite ignoring the manufacturer’s claim that the
machine will do its work with a little attention every twelve hours,
and that no serious harm will result if the operator happens to
leave it alone for twenty-four hours. The facts as to this are, as
the experienced operator has learned, that while an incubator may
run for weeks without requiring attention except at the regular
intervals, it may go wrong at any time, and many: hatches are lost
which might have been saved had the operator been on the look-
out to promptly correct wrong conditions. When operations are on
a large scale the risk of loss is so great that the wise poultry keeper
takes no unnecessary chances, but looks after his incubators and
brooders early, often, and late. In small operations it may not
seem profitable to give the time to this, and on the actual value of
the eggs, or of the chicks when hatched, it may not be profitable ;
POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 281. Stone incubator house on plant
of E. O. Damon, Hanover, Massachusetts
but considering such points in
their general relation to his work,
the poultry keeper will find that
hecannotafford to leave undone
anything that it is in his power
to do in order to hatch, at the
most favorable season, the young
stock that he needs. Special
emphasis has been laid upon
this point, because economy of
attention which amounts to neg-
lect of incubators is the great stumblingblock of the small operator.
Selection of an incubator. The
choice of an incubator is a less
important matter than is com-
monly supposed. Although there
are manufactured in America
over a hundred differently named
incubators, most of them are imi-
tations of popular machines, the
imitation being sometimes infe-
_ rior in construction or different
in some particular, but as often
equal to, and occasionally an im-
Fic. 282. Laboratory building at Mary-
land Experiment Station. Incubator
room in basement. (Photograph from
the station)
provement on, the model. It is notorious that some of the best-
Fic. 283. Laboratory building at Massa-
chusetts Agricultural College. Incu-
bator room in cellar. (Photograph from
the college)
known incubators on the market
are substantially identical and as
nearly equal as may be in hatch-
ing results, the differences in
hatches of machines of different
makes being no more noticeable
than differences in hatches from
machines of the same make. It
is not unusual to find poultrymen
in the same locality preferring dif-
ferent machines. Even men oper-
ating in the same room, with the
same eggs, may not agree in their
INCUBATION 255
choice of an incubator. Some operators can get good results from
any machine, others cannot successfully run at the same time
machines requiring different adjustments.
With rare exceptions new incubators of all makes will hatch
fairly well if given sufficient attention, but the cheaper machines
usually require much closer watching than the higher-priced ones,
and at best are short-lived. It is generally advisable for a beginner
to select an incubator popular in his neighborhood, because then he
may profit more by the experience and suggestions of other oper-
ators. Hot-air machines are now commonly preferred for indi-
vidual incubators of ordinary capacity. In the so-called mammoth
incubator, consisting of a series of egg chambers on the same
heating system, hot-water heaters are necessarily used. These
mammoth incubators have the advantages of being more econom-
ical of fuel, requiring less labor to care for heaters and causing
less risk of fire, but the regulation of temperature throughout the
series has not yet! been brought sufficiently under automatic con-
trol to satisfy most operators.
Manufacturers’ directions for operating incubators. The direc-
tions furnished with an incubator should be followed at first and
until the operator has a well-defined purpose in departing from
them. These instructions are not exactly adapted to every situa-
tion, but afford the best starting point for the operator in deter-
mining the mode of operation best adapted to his locality. While
incubators are in the main similar, most of them have some
minor differences which may affect the mode of operation, and
it is presumed that the manufacturer’s instructions cover these
points. The manufacturer’s instructions usually presuppose cer-
tain general conditions. They are based on the assumption that
the incubator will be operated in a dry, well-ventilated cellar
or room. Such instructions are manifestly inaccurate for an in-
cubator placed in a damp cellar, where the circulation of air
is slow though perhaps sufficient to provide oxygen as fast as
needed,— and also inaccurate for machines in an extremely dry
location. A machine which requires no moisture under average
conditions may require moisture in a dry place, and in a damp
location may need more ventilation. A machine which requires
+ IQTI.
256 POULTRY CULTURE
some moisture under ordinary conditions may hatch better with
no moisture if operated in a damp place, and may require much
Fic. 284. Cheap incubator cellar; a Fic. 285. Small incubator house. (Pho-
common type tograph from F. A. P. Coburn)
more moisture than the manufacturer’s instructions call for if
operated in a very dry place. This topic will be considered further
in a subsequent paragraph.
Manufacturers’ instructions should be supplemented by such
Jurther attention as is necessary to give reasonable assurance that
Fic. 286. Interior of an incubator cellar equipped with small incubators
INCUBATION 257
right conditions continue in the intervals between the regular
hours for attending the incubator. This will depend mostly upon
the faithfulness and skill with which instructions have been fol-
lowed, and upon the judgment used in modifying them to suit local
conditions, but occasionally also upon weather changes. Thus, after
fillmg lamps and trimming wicks, many operators return in the
course of fifteen or twenty minutes to see that lamps are burning
well. They also take a look at the incubators, noting the temper-
ature and the condition of the flame whenever they happen to be
gauer
J
Fic. 287. Interior of incubator cellar at Pittsfield Poultry Farm, Pittsfield, Maine,
showing one side of a mammoth (Hall) incubator of six-thousand-egg capacity
(Photograph from Pittsfield Farm)
near them. In extreme cold weather or in high winds they watch
the incubators very closely, for it is under such conditions that the
ordinarily automatic regulator is most likely to become erratic.
Selection of eggs for artificial incubation. Considering only the
matter of incubation, selection of eggs need not be as rigid for
artificial as for natural incubation. When the eggs are to be turned
in the trays they must be of uniform size or many may be broken
in turning. When eggs are turned by hand, by shuffling on the
tray, uniform size is not so essential, although as a rule it is not
desirable to use those varying much from the average size of
258 POULTRY CULTURE
the lot. Eggs with irregular and defective shells are often hatched
artificially, when by the natural method they would be likely to
be broken. Even a cracked egg may be patched with sticking
plaster, or with a piece of paper gummed over the crack, and
successfully incubated. The use of ill-formed and defective eggs
is not advised except in case of scarcity of perfect eggs, when it
may be better to fill up the incubator with such eggs as are avail-
able than to wait until the required number of selected eggs can
be obtained. The eggs used should be as fresh as possible. It is
desirable that they be from vigorous stock that is known to be pro-
ducing strongly fertile eggs, but as a rule the quality of the eggs
secured for first hatches is doubtful-—to be determined only by
the result.
Preliminary regulation of heat. A new incubator, or one that
has been out of use for some time, should be run empty for several
days, no eggs being put into it until it is adjusted to and running
steadily at 103°. It will require several hours to bring the egg
chamber back to that temperature after cold eggs are placed in it.
Then the actual process of incubation begins.
Routine work of incubator operation. The ordinary routine of
incubator operation is as follows : The lamp is filled once a day, and
the wick trimmed at that time and also, if it seems necessary, after
twelve hours. If the lamp is small, or if oil of inferior quality is used,
it is better to remove the charred scale from the wick twice a day.
Turning the eggs is begun on the third day and continued twice
daily until the eighteenth day (for ducks’ eggs, the twenty-fourth
day), after which the eggs should not be turned. For a long time
it was the common practice to turn the eggs by placing an inverted
tray over the tray containing the eggs, and, holding the two trays
tightly together, turning them so as to place the eggs, turned half
over, in the new tray. The method now generally preferred is by
shuffling, which only slightly changes the position of the egg and
more closely conforms to the conditions in natural incubation.
Some machines have attachments for turning the eggs without
removing from the machine, but operators generally prefer to take
them out.
Cooling the eggs begins simultaneously with turning. Until the
seventh day the cooling incident to the removal of the eggs for
INCUBATION 259
turning is sufficient. After that, at one turning each day they are
kept out of the machine until cool to the touch, the time ordinarily
required being from ten to thirty minutes, according to the tempera-
ture of the room and the development of the embryos, which, as they
increase in size, retain the heat longer. In warm weather a much
longer time may be required. Cooling is discontinued at the same
time as turning. Cooling is sometimes done by simply leaving
the door of the egg chamber open, but that does not expose the
eggs uniformly to the air.
Testing is done at any time from the third or fourth to the
seventh day, and again from the twelfth to the fourteenth day.
The object of testing as early as development will show is to
remove the infertile eggs, which, if taken out early, are salable for
culinary purposes. At the later tests the eggs containing dead
germs are removed.
A record of each hatch is usually kept by the incubator operator,
either on a card kept on the machine, or in a notebook. In this
record is noted the number and description of the eggs set, the
temperature of the egg chamber at regular intervals, the number
of infertile eggs and dead germs removed at the tests, and any
irregularities which might affect the hatch. This routine work is
all simple and essentially mechanical.
Factors in artificial incubation. To correctly adjust ventilation
and moisture is the special task in incubator operation. This will
be found easy or difficult according to whether the operator has
so placed the machine that its ordinary adjustments suit, or, if it
is placed otherwise, has used good judgment in estimating in what
way and how much the conditions vary from conditions in which
the machine was designed to be operated, and in making the appro-
priate changes.
Ventilation and moisture questions in incubation are very
closely related —interdependent. It is claimed for some incu-
bators that they need no moisture, and for others that the ven-
tilation in them is automatic. Such claims hold only for the
average condition to which a machine is adjusted as it leaves the
1 An infertile egg that has been incubated is stale (the staleness depending
on the period of incubation) but may be as good as the ordinary run of market
eggs in hot weather.
260 POULTRY CULTURE
factory. Even for approximately average conditions it is found
that if the instructions of the manufacturer indicate that moisture
is to be supplied in uniform quantity, they leave ventilation to be
regulated by the operator; and if ventilation is to be constant,
moisture is to be regulated according to the judgment of the
operator. These things are generally implied, if not always
plainly expressed. Though the operator may overlook them at
first, experience soon shows him what he must do.
The source of moisture in incubation. The eggs incubated furnish
the moisture in incubation. An egg is from 60 to 65 per cent
water and has a porous shell. Exposed to ordinary temperatures,
the contents of an egg gradually dries up through evaporation of its
water, The rate and amount of evaporation under incubation may
be found by weighing the eggs at intervals. Experiments to deter-
mine this point have been made at several experiment stations. In
nineteen days of incubation a fertile egg may lose by evaporation
as much as 17 per cent of its original weight; the least loss re-
corded in an experiment is 11 per cent. On this (11 per cent)
basis a setting of eggs weighing 26 ounces would lose by evapora-
tion 2.86 ounces. It is estimated! that this amount of moisture, if
distributed evenly through nineteen days, would be sufficient to
saturate the air in a nest four times an hour throughout the entire
period. In other experiments the percentage of evaporation was
still higher. Atwood? estimates that ‘‘one hundred fertile eggs of
average size will lose 234.9 grams, or 8.28 ounces, during the first
five days of incubation; 341.8 grams, or 12.05 ounces, during the
next seven days; and 352.8 grams, or 12.44 ounces, during the
next seven days.”
Use of ventilation. The essential function of ventilation in arti-
ficial incubation is to remove the moisture and gases exhaled by
the eggs. In an improperly designed incubator, ventilation might
be necessary to carry off the fumes of the lamp entering the egg
chamber. In any incubator, ventilation must provide for the re-
moval of moisture to allow normal evaporation from the egg. As
the condition of the egg is affected by the condition of the egg
' Day, “ Humidity in Relation to Incubation,” Bulletin No. 163, Ontario Depart-
ment of Agriculture.
2 Bulletin No. 73, West Virginia University Agricultural Experiment Station.
Fic. 2go. Forty hours
nl
Fic. 294. Fertile egg seen Fic. 295. Fertileegg, Fic. 296. Chick just be-
through tester, seventh day fourteenth day fore hatching
DEVELOPMENT OF CHICK IN INCUBATION
(Photographs from E. T. Brown, made by E. C. Hearson, London, England.
Figs. 288—293 and 296 show contents of egg with shell removed)
261
262 POULTRY CULTURE
chamber, so the condition of the egg chamber is affected by the
condition of the apartment in which the incubator is operated.
Thus the problem of ventilation becomes a matter of the proper
adjustment of the machine to its atmospheric environment, to secure
the normal evaporation of the eggs. If the atmosphere of the apart-
ment is relatively dry, a ventilator of fixed opening may remove
moisture from the egg chamber too fast, and the air in it will be-
come so dry that the rate of evaporation from the eggs will be
too high. Then evaporation could be checked by moistening the
air (wetting the floor) of the room, by placing moisture pans in
the egg chamber, or by
reducing the ventila-
tor opening. Deficient
evaporation would be
remedied, in an incu-
bator with supplied
moisture, by removing
water from the egg
chamber, by increasing
the ventilator open-
Fic. 297. Egg just before exclusion and partially 3 i
excluded chick ing, or by increasing
the ventilation and
reducing the humidity of the air in the room; in a nonmoisture
machine the deficiency would be remedied by the two means last
mentioned.
Measuring ventilation. The standard gauge of ventilation is
the rate of evaporation in natural incubation. Comparison may be
made either on a basis of the size of the air cell as observed by
testing, or by weighing eggs artificially incubated from time to time
and comparing the loss of weight with the standards experimen-
tally determined from natural incubation. With suitable scales each
tray used may be weighed empty and the weight marked on it,
weighed with the eggs when filled, and afterwards as often as de-
sired. The data as given for one five-day and two seven-day periods
are not adapted to this purpose. As it is desirable to discontinue the
handling of eggs after the eighteenth day, the best arrangement is
to make the weighings at the close of the sixth, twelfth, and eight-
eenth days. For six-day periods the loss of weight is approximately
INCUBATION 263
ten ounces on each hundred average eggs, and on this basis the
proper loss of weight for any number of eggs is readily computed.
It should be understood that the shrinkage in natural incubation is
not uniform, and that equally good hatches would probably be ob-
tained on any evaporation between the 11 per cent observed at the
Ontario station and the 17 per cent observed at the West Virginia
station, — possibly between wider limits, though it seems improb-
able that the limit could be moved much farther up or down without
affecting the result. When it is not convenient to weigh eggs, it is
advisable (especially for the novice) to run check lots of eggs under
hens, using two or more hens if possible, that the check may not
be invalidated by a poor sitter or by accident. A further advantage
in check hatching with hens is that a right amount of evaporation
does not necessarily insure a hatch, and that the results from the
hens afford checks on other points which may need investigation.
Management of the incubator at hatching time. The excuses
for disturbing the hen at this time do not apply to the incubator.
From the time when the eggs are last turned and cooled (on
the eighteenth day) until the chicks have ceased hatching, it is
as well to let them alone. The temperature tends to rise at this
time, and may be allowed to go to 104” or 105°, but if it runs
higher, the flame should be reduced. All chicks that are to hatch
should be out within twenty-one days (ducks, twenty-eight days)
from the time of the beginning of incubation, though the eggs of
large breeds may run a little longer. Eggs that have been run at
too low a temperature, or have been chilled, are likely to be delayed
and to give rather weak chicks. Such matters, and any other points
shown by the record which would affect the hatch, should be given
consideration in dealing with belated hatches. It is usual to leave
the young birds in the incubators from twelve to thirty-six hours
after the conclusion of the hatch. When the incubator is provided
with a nursery (under the egg tray) the birds are allowed to drop
into it, where they have more room and leave more room on the
tray for the late comers.
Accounting for results. Consideration of results and the causes
affecting them should be made with some care after the hatch.
This is as important when the hatch is good as when it is unsat-
isfactory. When good results are obtained notwithstanding some
264 POULTRY CULTURE
unfavorable condition or irregularity during incubation, it is espe-
cially important to note carefully the amount of deviation from the
normal condition or from approved practice. As a rule, occasional
or moderate variation from prescribed conditions will not materially
affect results, although a wider deviation, or too many slightly un-
favorable conditions occurring simultaneously, might cause a poor
hatch. On this account any noticeable variation from conditions
which it is designed to maintain throughout the period of incu-
bation must be regarded as a possible cause of an unsatisfactory
hatch, and must further be considered a possible cause of mortality
in the young birds, and perhaps of lack of vitality in those that
survive to maturity.
Causes of poor hatches. The causes of poor hatches have been
indicated in preceding paragraphs, but it is worth while to summarize
them here and to comment on some points. A fertile egg with
germs of normal vitality, when incubated naturally, will (barring
accident) produce in due time a vigorous bird. Failure to do so
indicates lack of fertility or vitality, or is evidence of neglect or
accident. It cannot be assumed that, with all conditions and factors
right, the failure of the embryo to develop is normal. It must be
assumed that, if all the facts were known, the cause of a poor hatch
in any case would be plainly apparent. It is not always possible to
know all the facts, yet in a majority of cases the known facts.show
causes sufficient to account for the results, as will appear if the
operator, instead of making mental comparisons, will write down
systematically the conditions of a good hatch, and opposite each
item note the condition in the hatch under consideration.
The general causes of poor hatches are (I) poor eggs and (2)
wrong management. For the quality of the eggs the responsibility
is with the breeder or, where all operations are in the same hands,
is to be considered in connection with the subject of breeding. The
determination of the hatching quality of the eggs is a necessary
preliminary to consideration of the conditions of incubation. In by
far the greater number of cases of poor hatches with incubators,
the quality of the eggs is unknown, the operator having no check
of any kind on his results. In such cases he is all at sea, and any
consideration of how points in management may have affected
results is mere speculation, except when it is known that some
INCUBATION 265
fault in incubation would have made a good hatch impossible, no
matter how good the eggs. If it is known that eggs from a certain
lot are hatching 80 per cent, either under hens or in other incu-
bators, a much lower hatch in any case is reasonably conclusive
evidence that the hatch was not properly handled. In such a case
the experienced operator knows that something went wrong during
incubation, though he may not know what it was;! the inexpe-
rienced operator is likely to blame the machine. In a sense it
may be the fault of the machine, but the operator is responsible
for the machine. It is his business to know its limitations and to
see that everything essential to successful incubation is done.
Common errors in operating incubators. The most prevalent
faults in the management of incubators are (1) irregular and defi-
client attention and (2) poor judgment in ventilation and moisture.
Errors of the first class are easily corrected if the operator can look
after the work at frequent intervals, and if he gives his attention
to it. Errors of the second class are more difficult to overcome.
They can be definitely ascertained only when other causes of poor
hatches have been eliminated. They are affected by variations in
general atmospheric conditions, by the volume of air and the venti-
lation in the apartment in which the incubators are placed, and by
the number of incubators in the apartment. The best adjustments
are soonest found when several incubators of the same make are
operated at the same time on eggs of the same kind, and slight
variations in ventilation and moisture are made in the different
machines.
1 The most remarkable case of this kind that I have known was reported to me
by one of the most successful growers of winter chickens. From two incubators of
360-egg capacity, set with eggs from the same lot, he took, on the same day, from
one machine 299 chicks, from the other a few over 300 (the exact number I do
not now recall). Three months later he still had the 299 chicks from the first in-
cubator, but not a single chick of the second lot remained alive. They had died
at first by the score, then in smaller numbers until all were gone. As far as the
operator knew, the incubator was run correctly throughout the hatch, but from the
results (the chicks being brooded under exactly the same conditions) he knew
that something went wrong.
CHAPTER XV
GROWING POULTRY
Growth a natural process. Organic creatures grow by the con-
sumption and assimilation of suitable nourishment. Each, according
to its kind, takes from the food elements with which it comes in
contact as much of what is serviceable to it as it can secure and use.
The growth of an organism depends (1) on its constztation (organic
soundness and vitality, which determine its capacity for growth);
(2) on its exvironment} (fixed conditions which affect its vital
functions); (3) on the supply of food, and (4) on protection from its
natural enemies and from accidents.
Constitution fundamentally a matter of inheritance. From the
beginning of its development as an embryo each creature is sub-
ject to environmental influences. Within the comparatively brief
period of the development and growth of poultry, environment has
little power to mend and much power to mar constitution. Under
normal conditions of incubation a young bird, as it comes from the
shell, possesses unimpaired the constitution transmitted to it by its
parents. Any unfavorable condition or circumstance during incu-
bation tends to destroy the bird’s constitution and to diminish its
vitality. Conditions of incubation under which many eggs fail to
hatch usually impair the vitality of the birds which do hatch. It
is only in rare cases that all birds in a brood are perfectly devel-
oped and apparently of good constitution and vitality. There is
nearly always a small percentage of weaklings, and often a large
proportion of birds which, even under the best of care, will never
make ordinarily good specimens.
Initial selection. Elimination of weaklings is the first step in the
profitable management of young poultry. Although under favorable
conditions nature works steadily to bring constitution, vitality, and
1 Strictly, environment includes food and protection, but for convenience of
discussion the division is made as above. The feeding of young poultry is treated
in detail in the chapters containing the general discussion of the subject.
266
GROWING POULTRY 267
every organic function to the normal condition of efficiency, the
growing period is so short that it is not worth while to attempt to
work with young birds that are crippled, underdeveloped, or con-
spicuously lacking in vigor. Unless a bird is lively, bright, and
strong on its feet when the time comes to take it from the incu-
bator or the nest, it should be killed at that time. Such birds rarely
live to marketable age and condition, and the sooner they are put
out of the way the smaller is the loss on their account. In addi-
tion, the weak birds easily become the hosts of parasites and are
least able to resist disease, while their presence in a flock adds
greatly to the risk of epidemics. The natural reluctance to destroy
birds which might live and develop satisfactorily makes many
poultrymen too lenient in culling at this stage. Those who suc-
ceed in growing, with an insignificant percentage of loss, poultry
hatched and reared by the natural method get their results, as a rule,
by good judgment in separating the weak from the strong birds
at the earliest opportunity. When the birds have been artificially
hatched, their appearance at the time of taking from the incu-
bator is not so reliable an indication of soundness and vitality, for
troubles due to faulty incubation may not be plainly developed
at that time. Such, however, can be removed as cases develop.
Their cases do not affect the first culling. Culling at any time
in the first few weeks of the life of young poultry is done on the
principle that the bird that goes wrong at this time is not worth
keeping longer.
Preservation of vitality in young poultry. Under natural con-
ditions, physical and constitutional soundness is easily secured,
and notable progress may be made even in building up weak
constitutions. Though not commercially profitable, a little work in
this line may have great educational value. The improvement of
weak birds under favorable conditions clearly indicates that when
strong birds deteriorate, either the conditions or the rations are at
fault. It is usual to look to the feeding for the cause of trouble,
but in by far the greater number of cases the cause is to be found in
the conditions to which the birds are subjected. Unfavorable con-
ditions have much more serious effects on young poultry than upon
adults. Though independent of their parents to the extent that
substitutes for the parents’ care are easily provided, the young
268 POULTRY CULTURE
birds are very sensitive to unfavorable conditions, and much more
susceptible to disease than adults.
It is commonly said that the first three weeks are the critical
period in the life of a chick, — that the chick which lives to that
age is likely to live to maturity. That is not a general truth, for at
later periods there are many losses of chicks which were thrifty in
early life, but it is true for certain classes of cases, particularly for
cases of acute disorders directly due to wrong conditions at that
time or during incubation, and to improper feeding. In the first
few weeks of the life of young poultry mortality is, as a rule,
heavier than at any other period, not only because the birds are
actually more delicate then, but because, during the early part of
that period, those greatly lacking in vitality, and those affected by
unfavorable conditions during incubation, or by wrong brooder
temperature, die or begin to show marked symptoms of disease,
while it is not until after the second or third week that birds that
were originally vigorous begin to show the effects of other conditions
that are radically wrong, especially of wrong feeding. Favorable
conditions and good management at this time help (sometimes a
great deal) to remedy troubles originating in the parent stock or in
incubation. On the other hand, unfavorable conditions and bad
management at this stage of development will have bad effects and
often spoil young birds beyond remedy. It is possible by good care
to grow good birds under unfavorable conditions, but it is doubtful
whether in any case this can be done at a profit when the value of
labor is considered. Most poultry keepers who persist (unsuccess-
fully) in trying to grow poultry under unfavorable conditions fail
because they either will not or cannot do for the poultry the work
which the circumstances demand.
Overcrowding the prime cause of trouble in growing poultry.
Although other causes may seem more disastrous at times, there is
no other wrong condition as prevalent as overcrowding. Whatever
the kind of poultry kept, and whether natural or artificial methods
of rearing are used, the almost universal tendency is to overcrowd
the birds both as to the numbers in a specified area and as to the
continuous use of land for poultry. The remarkable results occa-
sionally secured under intensive conditions seem to make more
impression on the average poultry keeper than do the failures
GROWING POULTRY 269
which are the common experience of those who overcrowd grow-
ing poultry. One reason for this is that, taking the exceptional in-
stance as proof that crowding is not itself detrimental, they look
elsewhere for the cause of their troubles. In cases where crowded
poultry gave good results a full statement of conditions will invari-
ably show that other conditions were exceptionally favorable, — the
stock was uncommonly vigorous, the land was fresh, the weather
was favorable, the keeper was very skillful, and, it may be added,
very fortunate. The different kinds of poultry differ in capacity to
withstand the effects of crowding, but in all kinds of poultry it will
be found the rule that in order to keep the stock up to a high
Fic. 298. Growing chickens on range at Pittsfield Poultry Farm. (Photograph
from Pittsfield Farm)
standard of development, the growing birds require conditions much
more favorable, and more nearly natural, than those which they
require when mature.
What constitutes overcrowding. Overcrowding cannot be pre-
cisely defined in terms of number of birds and area of coop or
brooder, or of yard or land. Indoors it is a question of az rather
than of area; outdoors, a question of land not polluted by the drop-
pings of poultry, and free from germs of poultry diseases and from
poultry parasites which harbor in the soil. In the natural state, and
under approximately natural conditions in domestication, all kinds
of poultry are hatched and reared in small groups, or broods. The
Fic. 299, Cloth shades over brooder- I's. 300. Grass range with corn
house yards at Cornell University
grown at the sides for shade
Fic. 3o1, Chickens in permanent
Chickens in colony houses
house in old orchard
in young orchard
Fic. 303. In the field after the corn Fic. 304. Roosting quarters at Cornell,
has been cut open on three sides
SOME FEATURES OF GOOD PRACTICE IN GROWING CHICKENS
(FIGs, 299 and 304 are photographs from New York State Agricultural College at
Cornell University)
270
GROWING POULTRY 271
number of young birds in a single natural brood rarely cxceeds ten,
the number in a group of such broods is rarely greater than twenty-
five or thirty. The mothers, with their young, forage either in-
dependently or in groups of two or three broods. The different
broods usually separate at night,
if accommodations permit. If
several mothers with large broods
sit close together, it will usually
be found that some of the young
soon show the effects of crowd-
ing, especially when they are in
a small coop or in a corner, and
when the circulation of the air
Fic. 305. Six-weeks ducklings at is slow, — for the movement of
Weber Brothers’ duck farm. Fruit the air is slightly, if at all, influ-
rees just set out in yards
enced by the number of birds at
the spot, while the condition of the air depends on the number of
birds breathing it. This is equally true as to the air in a brooder. If
the mothers are kept separate, or have an opportunity to follow the
natural inclination to keep the broods separate at night, there is no
trouble from crowding at that time.
After the young birds are
weaned, they will, if left to them-
selves, keep well distributed. Itisa
common practice at that time, how-
ever, to combine broods into larger
groups before putting them into
new quarters; from putting too
many birds into small, ill-ventilated amiren ;
coops, and from the tendency of a0 Chekens in double rane
the birds to huddle together when from J. W. Clark)
they are moved to new quarters and
the natural groups are broken up, this stage of the life of young
chickens is especially full of troubles due to overcrowding, aggra-
vated, in many cases, because it comes just at the season when
weather conditions make crowding most disastrous.
In the artificial rearing of poultry Jarger numbers of young
birds are placed together from the first. The primary object is to
Fic, 308. Colony plan adopted after a few vears’ experience with intensive
) ¥ 3
metheds; houses close together, but moved yearly
Fic. 309. Method now in use; colonies well scattered and extensive range
FROM INTENSIVE TO EXTENSIVE METHODS OF GROWING CHICKENS
AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY
(Photographs from New York State Agricultural College at Cornell University)
272
GROWING POULTRY 273
economize the cost of equipment and labor by making the groups as
large as possible. In a properly heated and ventilated brooder the
number of young birds may be much larger than in the natural
group, but must still be small compared with the seeming capacity
of the compartment. Common experience has taught the neces-
sity of keeping young poultry of all kinds in comparatively small
groups, wholly or partly separated, either by partitions or fences
or by distance. This is the general practice in the communities
where poultry growing is most flourishing.
The poultry farmer in Rhode Island keeps his chickens in flocks
of from twenty-five to thirty-five. The grower of winter chick-
ens in eastern Massachusetts
Fic. 310. A part of Fig. 309,
showing more plainly how the colonies are distributed
usually keeps them, after weaning, in flocks of fifty. Thatis the stand-
ard, though occasionally from seventy-five to one hundred may be
put into a house large enough to accommodate them. In both cases
the coops and houses used give small floor space per chicken but are
open and well ventilated, allowing an abundant supply of fresh air.
In any coop or house the floor is renovated as often as necessary by
removing accumulated droppings. If the floor is of earth a part of
the floor is removed with the droppings, and a new floor of earth
may be put into the house at regular intervals. If the floor is of
wood it may be covered with a coating of earth or litter. As long
as the droppings in the house or coop remain dry, they do no harm.
Out of doors suitable sanitary conditions are not so easily main-
tained. It is natural to suppose that if poultry can remain night
after night on a suitable floor containing the nightly accumulations
274 POULTRY CULTURE
of droppings of perhaps a week or two, their outside run need not
be very large to give equally good sanitary conditions. Nor need
it be if the grower can give the birds the care which will compen-
sate for the lack of the advantages of a range supplying their wants
in abundance. This cannot be done when poultry growing is on a
considerable scale or on an economic basis. The yard or range must
be large enough to furnish green food. A yard that is in grass
must be of such size, or so stocked, that the grass will keep grow-
ing and be clean. It is not enough that the grass simply maintain
itself, tramped down, soiled, and affording no food. In the best
practice young chickens are put on grassland which has had no
poultry on it during the preceding season. The grass is mowed
close when the chickens are put out, and the coops are placed at such
intervals that the young chickens will, under ordinary conditions,
keep the grass down just enough to make mowing unnecessary.
For goslings the practice is much the same, except that it is usual
to confine them to a limited strip until they have grazed it down, and
then to move them. Ducklings seem less affected by foul ground
than other young poultry, but a run on grass, rye, or other young
grain will make a marked difference in the quantity of ground
grain consumed, and they will show plainly, both in actions and in
condition, the advantage of a change from foul to fresh ground.
Young turkeys, peafowl, guineas, and phcasants all seem to be
even more affected by foul ground than chickens, but it is a question
whether, if they were equally docile and contented under restrictions,
any difference in this respect could be found.
Overcrowding in most cases unnecessary. The worst cases, both
in the city and in the country, are found where the ground available
is more than ample to give the poultry favorable conditions, but is
not utilized, either from false ideas of economy or from sheer negli-
gence. Young poultry of the smaller kinds, grown in towns or in
the suburbs of cities, usually have to be kept in wire-covered runs
until large enough to be safe from cats. It is no uncommon thing
to see in one of these runs three or four times as many birds as
should be in it, and to see the run kept on the same spot for weeks
and even months, while all around it there is good grass growing
and going to waste. On farms devoted largely to poultry growing
it is not unusual to find the young stock grown year after year on
GROWING POULTRY 275
the same land, though there is abundance of fresh land available.
A poultry grower ought by all means to consider economy in labor,
but not at the cost of general deterioration of stock, or of some loss
of development on every bird grown in a season. When poultry
of any kind, at any age, are kept on land not suitable for them, while
better land lies idle or is occupied only by something the poultry
would not injure, the methods of managing are radically wrong.
Warmth the first requirement of young poultry. If the young
birds are kept warm and comfortable they will keep quiet most of
the time for the first few days. If they are with natural mothers
it is advisable to keep the mothers on their nests or in a close coop
in which they will brood the young almost constantly until the
young birds themselves show a strong disposition to forage. After
that it is better to confine the mother and give the young liberty,
with free access to her until they are strong enough to follow her
without tiring. In most kinds of poultry this will be several weeks.
Under the usual conditions in domestication, and particularly where
large numbers are kept, it is advisable to keep natural mothers con-
fined until the young are weaned. For chickens this will be, in
spring and summer, five or six weeks; for ducklings, about three
weeks ; for goslings with hens, about ten days. The later goslings,
hatched by the geese, and the young turkeys and other less domes-
tic kinds of poultry, are usually allowed to run with the adults
throughout the season. When birds lay only at the breeding
season, nothing is gained by separating parent and young when
the young no longer need brooding.
Brooding temperatures. The temperature in natural brooding is
the same as for incubation, but it is tempered or reduced by the
young bird’s keeping partly or wholly from under the mother, and
by the mother bird’s taking a half-rising posture. The young may
remain wholly under the mother at first, but soon begin to sit
under her with their heads out, thus getting all the warmth that
contact with her body and that of other young will give, and at
the same time getting a full supply of fresh air. As they grow
(or, in very warm weather, while still small) they may not stay
under her at all at night, but still benefit by proximity to the
heat of her body. If they become wet or chilled at any time, they
resort to the natural brooder and are at once in contact with heat
276 POULTRY CULTURE
of a temperature which quickly warms and dries them. Except for
what are called (perhaps erroneously) low-temperature! hens, the
temperature in natural brooding, with suitable-sized broods, is never
injuriously wrong. The regulation of temperature is automatic and
nearly perfect.
Regulation of heat in artificial
brooding. The operation of a
brooder presents problems similar
to the problems of artificial in-
cubation. The general problem
Se is to provide a substitute for the
FIG. 311. Brooder house at Massa- heat of the parent bird. It is
chusetts Agricultural College. (Pho- : .
tograph from the college) economically necessary that this
be done at a cost for equipment
and labor that will leave a profit on the work. While it is not
required that a uniform temperature be as steadily maintained as
in incubation, the artificial brooder must be in a measure auto-
matically regulating for temperature, and fresh air must be supplied
to the young birds in the hover in much larger quantities than to
the eggs in the egg chamber of the incubator. The difficult point
is to secure free ventilation while maintaining a sufficiently high
temperature. This is commonly
made more difficult in practice
through the tendency of poultry-
men to economize capital, space,
and labor by putting into each
brooder compartment the largest :
number of chicks or ducklings cee uaa aa ree at ales
that it is considered possible “(pndtograph feces conten
to keep in it. To effect sales,
manufacturers often overrate the capacity of a brooder. The capacity
of a brooder of fixed size to contain growing birds is obviously
1 This is one of many points not experimentally determined. The “low-tem-
perature ” fowl seems so to the touch. She lacks vitality and may be sick. She
may be nervous and irritable, and worry or neglect her young. Her temperature is
certainly not so far below normal that it alone would seriously affect the young
birds, but as young birds with such mothers do quite regularly show bad effects,
it is assumed that this is due to a wrong attitude of the mother toward them, or
that such a mother draws vitality from her young instead of conserving theirs.
GROWING POULTRY 277
constantly decreasing, when measured in numbers of birds con-
tained. The capacity of a brooder is often given (correctly for a
time) at the number of newly hatched birds that may be kept in
it; but the need of reduction of numbers as the birds grow is not
always sufficiently emphasized. This form of misrepresentation
is sometimes excused on the ground that at the average rate of
loss the losses of chicks or ducklings will offset the increase in
size of those which remain, but there can be no valid excuse for
instructions that are most misleading when the birds are doing
best. Experienced growers generally put into individual (heated)
brooders rated as having a capac-
ity of from seventy-five to one
hundred only about half those
numbers, and into the compart-
ments of brooder houses they put
the young birds in lots of about one
hundred, though for some time
each compartment might safely
carry two hundred or more. As
has been said, under natural con-
ditions all young birds are pro- [iiiBMiBBS ccs P
duced and reared in small groups. Fic. 313. Fireless, or “cold,” brooders
Massing them in large numbers at Provincial Poultry-Breeding Station,
creates conditions both unfavor- P4monte™ sired eeptaphiinons
able and dangerous to them. In
exceptional cases a large group may thrive, but as a rule the birds
do best when kept in lots not many times larger than the natural
groups. In general practice, brooders and brooder houses are
adapted to this principle.
Methods of artificial brooding. There are three general meth-
ods of providing heat without natural mothers: (1) by fireless, or
“cold,” brooders; (2) by individual brooders, each heated by a
lamp or a stove; (3) by a hot-water system arranged to make one
heater and system of pipes furnish heat to a series of brooding
compartments.
Cold brooders are small boxes, usually with a capacity of from
twenty-five to fifty young chickens, in which the birds keep warm
through contact and the conservation of the heat from their bodies.
278 POULTRY CULTURE
As commonly constructed, the sides are of wood, paper, or metal,
with holes for the passage of the birds. The top is composed of
one or more “ quilts ’’ of lightly padded cheesecloth so adjusted that
the center is depressed and the little birds nestle to it instead of
crowding into the corners. In a heated room or brooder house, or
elsewhere in moderate weather, these brooders may work very well,
but birds in them require close attention at first, and they are not
adapted to low temperatures. The fireless brooder, as developed to
date,! is not adapted to regular use on an extended scale. Some
of the so-called fireless brooders are used‘ with -a hot-water jug or
bottle for low temperatures.
Lamp-heated brooders. Lamps are generally used when poultry
is grown artificially on a small scale. Lamp brooders are of many
different makes, but are nearly all built on the same principle.
They consist of a box heated by an outside lamp, the hot air from
the lamp being conveyed to the upper part of the interior, and the
passages for the chicks being small, to prevent a circulation of air
which would make the temperature too low. In some brooders a
second compartment, partly heated by the warmer air from the first,
is provided. Though mostly on the same general model, brooders
of this type vary somewhat in construction, especially in quality of
materials, workmanship, and adjustments. With proper attention,
most of them will give very satisfactory results. As a rule, the
cheaper brooders require closest attention and involve greatest risk
of fire. In all lamp brooders the danger from fire is greater than
with incubators, first, because of the dust raised by the birds, and
next, because the lamp is more exposed. Somewhat different styles
of these brooders are made for indoor and for outdoor use, the out-
door style being built to protect the brooding compartment and
lamp from the weather. Poultrymen generally prefer to use the
indoor style in a small house or under a shed. Kerosene lamps are
most used for heat, but gasoline has been found satisfactory. A
small system of brooders may be heated from the same reservoir
of gasoline. The risk and the labor of caring for many lamps tend
to limit the use of individual brooders.
Pipe brooder systems. Hot-water heaters and pipes were used
at an early stage of the development of artificial brooding. In the
lyort.
GROWING POULTRY 279
early brooders of this type the pipes were run under a close hover,
and the heater used was seldom large enough to maintain the de-
gree of heat required in extreme cold weather. In such a brooder
the supply of fresh air under the hover was often inadequate, the
temperature was likely to run up with a high outside temperature
and almost certain to go down with low outside temperature, and
results — as was to be expected —were very uneven. The defects
were most serious for the youngest birds but diminished in impor-
tance as the birds grew, for then they not only required less heat
but contributed the warmth of their bodies to keep up the tempera-
ture through a cold spell. To provide for these conditions many
houses were built with individual brooders (called nursery brooders)
in one end, for the birds up to three or four weeks old, and a pipe
brooder system in the other end for the older birds. Methods of
reénforcing the heat furnished by the pipes were also tried. In
many houses two heaters had been installed to provide for the
contingency of accident to the heater in regular use, and in cold
weather both heaters were used. Supplementary coils of pipe were
also placed on the wall of the house, usually at the north side but
sometimes on the south, to keep up the temperature of the house
outside the hovers. All these things helped. Eventually experi-
menters worked out the simple plan of using a heating system of
sufficient capacity to maintain the required temperature under open
or loosely covered pipes at any season. This is the type of brooder
now giving the best results for artificial brooding on a large scale.
It is described in detail in the chapter on poultry houses. It is
not perfect ; even when equipped with the best-known regulators
at the heater and with electric regulators on the pipes, it will not
run reliably without close attention, but of the many different
methods of brooding chicks in large numbers that have been and
are being tried this is giving the best results of all those in
general use. The real test of an appliance or of a method is its
adaptability to ordinary conditions and to a variety of conditions of
location and management. Inventors of appliances and promoters
of methocs and systems may test them under the most favorable
conditions, adjusting everything to suit. Under such circumstances
good results are often obtained with appliances or by methods
which in common use are not found satisfactory.
280 POULTRY CULTURE
Temperature in artificial brooding. The best temperature condi-
tions are secured if it is possible for the young birds to come in
contact with from 105° to 106° of heat without huddling together,
and to have any desired lower degree of heat. They may live and
thrive at a lower range of temperatures. With access to the high-
est temperatures mentioned, they remain mostly where the tem-
perature is lower, but have the extra heat if they need it. It is
customary to take the temperature of a brooder at the level of the
birds in it, and at that point 95° is considered the right tempera-
ture; but if a brooder is so constructed that a chilled chick or
duckling can find heat greater than 95° only by contact with others,
the birds, when cold, will huddle together. Provided ventilation is
sufficient, and the young birds can get to any comfortable lower
temperature, it is much safer to have the brooder heat at its source
too high than to take the risk of too low temperatures. Whatever
style of brooder is used it is essential that the young birds have access
both to heat ina well-ventilated place and to fresh air at a moderate
degree of heat. Ina properly constructed individual brooder these
conditions are secured, according to the size and style of the
brooder and the age of the birds, by the adjustment of the hover
and the ventilation of the compartment in which it is placed, and
further (in brooders of more than one compartment) by a down-
ward gradation of temperatures as compartments remove from the
source of heat. In the so-called open-pipe system the highest
temperatures are secured either by placing a movable hover over
the pipes or by filling the floor with earth, sand, or litter to
bring the birds nearer the pipes, or by both means. In a compart-
ment five feet wide a complete range of temperatures from 106°
or over downward may be had by placing a loose cover (with or
without side fringe, according to the temperature of the house)
over one half of the pipes, leaving the other half open, the floor
being raised or lowered to suit the size of the birds.
Regulation of temperature in brooders. The proper tempera-
ture is indicated by the thermometer and by the attitude of the
birds. The thermometer gives the absolute temperature at a suit-
able point, showing whether it is sufficient. The attitude of normal,
healthy birds should show whether the extent of the area of highest
temperature is sufficient and the ventilation satisfactory. It should
GROWING POULTRY 281
also show whether there is a uniform gradation of conditions from
the warmest part of the brooder to a point where the heat does
not sensibly affect the heat of the apartment. In the old type of
pipe brooder, with permanent hovers built over the pipes, and close
fringes to retain the heat, the ventilation in the hover was in-
sufficient ; the change from inside to outside temperature was too
abrupt; there were practically but two conditions (neither perhaps
satisfactory) between which the birds must choose. If birds huddle
together at a temperature which an accurate thermometer shows is
sufficient for normal chicks or ducklings, that is evidence that the
birds are not normal,— that either they are constitutionally of low
vitality, or that they have been chilled; if birds huddle outside
the brooder or at a low temperature, the presumption is that they
have not access to a temperature high enough to be attractive.
If exposure was short, and the birds are promptly warmed, the hud-
dling should last but a short time, and no serious ill effects should
follow; if the tendency to huddle becomes chronic, the behavior
of the birds becomes unreliable for regulation of the brooder.
If such a lot of birds will not recuperate quickly when separated
into groups so small that crowding cannot be especially injurious,
and kept at the usual high temperature at the level of the birds in
brooding, they may be regarded as injured beyond remedy. Some
may live to make marketable poultry, but a profit and loss account
kept with such a lot usually shows a loss.
As in incubation, the regulation of temperature, while partly
automatic, requires such oversight that wrong conditions may be
promptly corrected. The successful growers of large numbers
of poultry by artificial methods almost live with their birds while
they require special attention. Regulators and electric alarms
may be used to relieve them of the necessity of unintermittent
watching, but they never leave the place without some one to re-
spond to an alarm, and they make complete rounds of brooders
before retiring at night and again the first thing in the morning.
To make sure that the birds will not get so far from the heat that
they will not find their way back to it when cold, it is usual to keep
an individual brooder closed until they become familiar with it; in
pipe brooder houses it is customary, for the first few days, to con-
fine them to the space under and near the pipes by means of a board
282 POULTRY CULTURE
across the compartment, gradually increasing the space before the
pipes by removing the board to a greater distance, until, when the
birds are thoroughly “ hover-broke,” it is removed altogether.
Period of artificial brooding. Under the same circumstances
and at the same seasons the requirements of the birds are the
same, regardless of the source of heat; but, as much of the work
by artificial methods is done in the fall, winter, and early spring,
the birds are often kept in the brooders much longer than natural
mothers would brood them. One of the principal advantages of
the artificial brooder is that it has no other function than to brood
young birds, so that they may be kept in it as long as they require
warmth, while natural mothers (especially early in the season) will
often wean their broods and resume laying long before the young
cease to need brooding. Winter chickens are kept in brooders up
to ten or twelve weeks of age, according to the weather and their
development. Ducklings require supplied heat only from three to
five weeks, according to the season.
Protection from enemies. Young birds are absolutely defenseless,
and, even when constitutionally strong, are physically frail in com-
parison with most of the creatures with which they come in contact.
Allowing them to run with larger poultry, whether of their own kind
or another, is a disadvantage. If allowed to run with other stock,
considerable numbers may be accidentally killed by being stepped on
by horses or cattle, or may be destroyed by hogs. Dogs and cats not
trained to let them alone may be very destructive, and rats even
more so, while almost every predatory wild animal or bird that
haunts inhabited districts is destructive to young poultry. The
smaller the birds, the greater the number of enemies they have to
fear; the slower their growth, the longer they require watching
and protection. Young chickens are hardly safe from persistent,
hungry cats until six or eight weeks old, while a young Pekin duck
two or three weeks old would not be likely to be molested, and gos-
lings would not be troubled after the first few days. Losses among
larger and quicker growing kinds are often equal to or greater than
losses among smaller ones, because they roam farther from home
and are more exposed to attacks of larger wild animals and birds.
The most effective way of protecting poultry (young or old)
is by destroying or driving away their enemies. Protection by
GROWING POULTRY 283
confining the birds does not suit either large operations or the most
advantageous use of land; it may be necessary for young poultry
grown in towns, or even in the country when destructive animals
are especially bold or numerous, but in general it should be the
object of the poultry keeper to give, to his young poultry at any
rate, all the liberty that they need for the most economical man-
agement of the stock and the best development of the birds, and
this requires the extermination of wild creatures and the restraint
of individual domestic animals destructive to poultry.1 A few of
these, if not checked, will make such inroads on the stock that the
immediate loss is heavy, and the effect on the plans of the grower
is likely to be far more serious.
Protection from parasites. Freedom from lice and worms is also
of more importance with young poultry than with adults. Internal
parasites (worms) are best prevented by keeping the young birds on
fresh ground and away from the general adult flock. Healthy, vig-
orous young birds will keep down external parasites (lice), if they are
given an opportunity to do so. Young chickens, turkeys, etc. which
have access to loose earth in gardens or fields should need no treat-
ment for lice. It is a good plan to put hens with broods onto a dry
earth floor for the first few days, giving them an opportunity to sub-
due the parasites at the start. In continuous wet weather, when the
soil will not pulverize, or when chickens are cooped on sod, they
should be dusted with an insect powder about once a week until
three weeks old. After that, under conditions at all suitable, there
should be no occasion for the poultry keeper to consider giving
1 The problem of the relation of the poultry keeper to neighbors who keep
dogs and cats which worry or destroy poultry is often a perplexing one. What-
ever may be his rights, expediency requires that the poultry keeper be governed
in some measure by near-by public opinion. It is in thickly settled places, es-
pecially in cities, that this becomes a hard problem. Sometimes the keeping of
poultry is an infringement on an ordinance which is overlooked by the authorities
so long as no occasion is given for complaint. In such cases there is nothing for
the poultryman to do but to securely inclose his young poultry. Where there is
no prohibition on poultry, the poultry keeper who confines his birds to his own
premises can insist that owners of cats and dogs which molest his poultry shall
pay damages and keep the animals off his premises. Even in towns where cats
and dogs are numerous, most of them are likely to be inoffensive, and if offenders
are known, a poultry keeper within his rights in keeping poultry, if he approaches
their owners tactfully, can usually have them restrained without arousing ill feeling
between neighbors. He should, however, be sure of his case.
284 POULTRY CULTURE
individual treatment for lice. Waterfowl which have access to water
in quantities sufficient for bathing or swimming are not likely to
be troubled with external parasites. When young ducklings and
goslings are brooded with hens and given water only for drinking,
they are often troubled with head lice. If the water in the drinking
vessel is deep enough to allow the bird to get the head well under
- water, it will keep the lice off its head and neck in this way; on
other parts of the body they are less dangerous, and the bird can
get at them with its bill, Young poultry hatched and reared arti-
ficially are less afflicted by lice, but it is not well to take it for
granted that incubators and brooders are free from them; young
birds in brooders will appreciate opportunities to dust themselves,
and so make assurance of freedom from the parasites doubly sure.
Growth proves the materials and work of the poultry grower.
If the birds grow normally the sum total of factors affecting growth
must be approximately right, deficiencies being offset by advantages
in other directions, — as faulty conditions by extra attention, slight
weakness in stock by very favorable conditions, etc.; if growth is
not normal, one factor must be radically wrong or several factors
slightly wrong, and the total of deficiencies so great as to have a
marked effect on the general result. Normal growth of poultry
is continuous and rapid; in the most rapidly growing common
kinds of poultry — geese and the larger breeds of ducks — the rate
of growth is so great that the fact that the birds are growing fast is
self-evident. In chickens and young turkeys growth is not so notice-
able, but it is plainly seen by comparing the birds, while small, with
younger birds, and, after they are weaned, either with younger birds
or with adults.
Rate of growth. This has been determined experimentally only
for chickens and ducklings. Though the number of experiments
is small, it is probable that, these being apparently average in-
stances, the figures are very near the ordinary averages and may
fairly be taken as standards for roughly ascertaining whether the
rate of growth is normal.
The rate of growth of chickens of different breeds and types is
surprisingly uniform for the first ten or twelve weeks. Differences
between individuals of the same stock are more marked than dif-
ferences in averages for different breeds. Leghorn chicks from
GROWING POULTRY
285
medium-sized to large Leghorn stock (males weighing 54 pounds
and upward, females 4 pounds
Fic. 314. Goslings three or four
days old
and upward) will often weigh as
much at ten or twelve weeks as
Brahma chicks from parents of
more than double the Leghorn
weights. After that, chicks of the
larger breeds rapidly outgrow the
others, growing much faster and
fora longer period. The ordinary
young chicken weighs about 14
ounces (rather less than more)
when twenty-four hours old. At
three to four weeks it should
weigh } pound; at six to eight
weeks, 1 pound; at nine to eleven weeks, 2 pounds; at three
months a chicken of the medium-weight breeds should weigh from
24 to 3 pounds, the cockerels
generally being the heavier birds,
though the largest pullets will
often outweigh the average cock-
erels. From this time birds of
this class should grow at the
rate of about 1 pound a month
(a little less for smaller speci-
Fic. 315. Goslings three weeks old
mens, a little more for larger ones) until from six to eight months
old, when they should be full grown and of average weight for
Fic. 316. Goslings nine weeks old
specimens of the kind, in fair
flesh but not fat.
In the smaller breeds the period
of growth is a little shorter, but
not so much as would be expected,
considering the rapidity of early
growth and the size of the birds
at maturity. In the larger breeds
growth is very rapid. The best-
growing specimens in all breeds
are usually a little ahead of the others from the start. In Asiatics
these specimens often begin, about the ninth or tenth week, to grow
286 POULTRY CULTURE
very fast. It is not unusual for large specimens to weigh close to
4 pounds at three months, and to grow at an average rate of over
2 pounds a month for the next four months, putting on an average
of over an ounce a day for that
period. This, however, is much
better than ordinary growth with
average stock. For such, 1}
pounds a month would be good
growth. Males usually grow both
a little faster and a little longer
than females.
The rate of growth of duck-
lings is much greater for the first
Fic. 317. White Leghorns, thirteen three months than that of chick-
ese ens. Ordinary Pekin ducklings
weigh about 2 ounces when hatched. At three to’four weeks they
should weigh 1 pound; at six to eight weeks, from 4 to 4} pounds ;
at ten weeks, from 54 to 6 pounds, the largest and fattest duck-
lings even more.! Unlike young chickens, the ducklings that
have been well fed are at this stage very fat. Those intended
for market are killed at from nine to twelve weeks of age. Those
reserved for breeding purposes continue to grow, but more slowly.
Usually they lose weight for a while through the loss of their
“baby fat.’ At five to six months of age Pekin ducks, when
well meated but not excessively se
fat, should weigh from 6 to 8 |ijmms :
pounds.
The rate of growth of geese
is about the same as that of
ducks, allowance being made for
the original difference in size.
The newly hatched gosling is
about double the weight of the
duckling. At ten weeks the gos-
ling of any of the large breeds or
their crosses should weigh from 9 to 12 pounds, and at five or
six months should have added about 50 per cent to this weight.
Fic. 318. White Wyandottes, fourteen
weeks old
1 J have weighed goslings that at three months weighed almost nine pounds.
GROWING POULTRY 287
Turkeys grow slowly at first. Though of different conformation,
and perhaps looking much larger, the average turkey chick at ten
or twelve weeks is often no heavier than a large Brahma cockerel
of the same age. The later growth of the turkey is more rapid,
birds at eight or ten months often weighing from 15 to 20 pounds.
In general it is with the growth for the first few months that
the poultry keeper is most concerned. A large part of the poultry
grown is disposed of within three months, and (with some differ-
ences in the management of birds for different purposes) conditions
and methods that have given normal development up to that time
can be relied upon to bring the birds to maturity in good form and
in good season. Young poultry that is below normal at three
months may be improved by good care and feeding, but will never
make first-class stock for any purpose.
Separation of the sexes while growing. Separation of males and
females at this stage is necessary only with chickens. The time of
separating them varies according to the precocity of the cockerels.
In the smaller breeds, like the Leghorn, it is advisable to separate
the sexes when the chicks are weaned, for soon after that many
of the males become troublesome. In the Wyandottes, Plymouth
Rocks, and similar breeds, if the more precocious males are re-
moved as soon as they begin to domineer over the others and
among the pullets, the sexes may be left together until they are
three, four, or five months old. In the Asiatics the sexes may be
kept together until well grown.
Separation according to age and size. Of much more importance
than separation according to sex is separation according to size.
Especially is this necessary with cockerels intended for exhibition
or breeding. The cockerels which at maturity will be best are, as
a rule, not the most precocious. The precocious birds domineer
over the others, and a cowed bird never develops as he should.
The best conditions in this respect are usually obtained when the
chicks are given at the start sufficient coop and land room to last
until they are well grown, and the culls and inferior birds and the
quarrelsome males removed as occasion arises, thus reducing the
numbers so that they are never overcrowded. Only an occasional,
exceptional lot will then outgrow its quarters, and such cases can
be taken care of by removing from each overflowed coop a few of
288 POULTRY CULTURE
the poorer birds in it, putting the surplus from several lots into
new quarters.
Disturbances should be avoided. With all their docility, poultry
of all kinds are very sensitive to alarms, to rough treatment, and
to change. These things affect the growth of young poultry just
as much as they do the laying and breeding qualities of adults. It
is especially desirable to avoid frequent separations and new com-
binations of groups of young birds, with all the confusion incident
to such changes. While it is preferable that a brood or lot of young
poultry of any kind keep practically the same quarters and range
throughout the growing period, that is often impossible. In any
case the poultry keeper should try to avoid unnecessary shifts.
Where the numbers are adapted to the land available it should be
possible to arrange to leave young poultry undisturbed, except for
removals as mentioned above, from the time when they are weaned
until they go to the fattening coop or into winter quarters, accord-
ing to the use to be made of them.
CHAPTER XVI
EGG PRODUCTION
Egg production distinguished from reproduction. Egg produc-
tion is a part of the process of reproduction in poultry performed by
the female, without association with the male, and yielding a product
immediately useful to man. Hens are generally used for commer-
cial egg production, the few eggs of other kinds of poultry occa-
sionally found in the markets or on tables being, as a rule, the
irregular surplus from flocks kept for breeding. An egg that has
not been fertilized, or that is deficient in fertility, may be complete
for man’s use for food, or for any of the manufacturing processes
in which eggs are used. Whether those properties which make
quality in the egg used as food affect the quality of the chick
when the egg is incubated has not been determined. Presumably
they do, but no demonstrations have been made which show it.
We may profitably use for egg production hens that it is not
advisable to use for reproduction. Egg production is in a large
measure, though not wholly or regularly, under the control of the
poultry keeper, and may be developed to the detriment of the full
function of reproduction. Subjects so related cannot be wholly
separated for discussion or study, but as far as possible the treat-
ment in this chapter will avoid enlargement upon points more
appropriately considered in the chapters on reproduction.
Reproductive organs of the female the source of eggs. The
reproductive system of the female consists of the ovaries, attached
to the backbone near the middle of the back, and a tube, the ovi-
duct, leading from the ovaries to the vent. There are two ovaries,
right and left, but as a rule only one is developed. Singularly,
the conspicuous function of the ovary is to develop the yolk, — the
part of the egg which contributes nothing to the development of
the embryo, but is absorbed just before exclusion and affords
nourishment for the first few days. Each yolk is at first a tiny
globular granule. After a bird begins to lay, the ovary presents the
289
290 POULTRY CULTURE
appearance of a mass of yolks of various sizes from full-grown to as
small as can be seen with the naked eye. A magnifying glass will
show many still smaller. It is commonly supposed that the number
of minute yolks is constitutionally and definitely fixed in each bird,
—that a bird cannot lay more than the original number, that it
will not lay all these unless kept in proper condition, and that, by
skillful management, a bird may be forced to produce in two or
three years as many of her predetermined quota of eggs as she
would naturally produce in six, eight, or more years. It has been
supposed until recently that the original number of ovules in the
average hen did not exceed five or six hundred. Observations
at the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station showed that the
number which could be counted with the naked eye and a com-
mon reading glass varied from about fifteen hundred, a number
several times greater than the recorded production of the most
prolific hens, to more than thirty-six hundred.
When the reproductive organs of the female bird are function-
ally active, each ovule, as it reaches maturity, is detached and passes
into the oviduct. As it passes down the oviduct it is first covered
with the white, or albumen, which is deposited in layers, and finally
by the lining membranes and the shell.
Laying begins when growth ceases. Normally ! laying begins at
maturity, but occasionally immature birds, especially of the smaller
and more prococious breeds, produce a few small eggs. The prema-
ture activity of the reproductive organs almost invariably results in
stunted growth and the postponement of the beginning of mature,
regular laying. Premature laying, though of no advantage, is often
considered by the poultry keeper an indication of reproductive vigor
1 The common difficulty in getting eggs from hens in winter, and the tendency
of other kinds of poultry not to lay until toward spring, seems to contradict this.
But the number of cases for which the statement holds good is so great as to
create the presumption that normally egg production in fowls commences immedi-
ately after growth is accomplished. The fact that wild birds wintering in a tem-
perate zone do not produce eggs until the following season does not prove that
under favorable conditions they would not. As the subject is developed in this
chapter, the reader should note that nearly every factor working against winter
egg production from hens works more effectively against the winter production
of eggs by wild land birds; while, in addition, the unprotected wild bird is more
exposed to its enemies in the fall and early winter than at any other season. What
happens in domestication may sometimes be a better index of native tendencies
than the phenomena of wild life as they appear to the ordinary casual observer.
EGG PRODUCTION 291
and future heavy laying, and so gives him little concern; retarded
laying is a matter for serious consideration. Although, as has just
been stated, laying begins normally with cessation of growth, normal
cases are ina minority. In a majority of cases laying does not begin
for some time after the bird is full grown. If the delay is only a few
weeks it hardly attracts attention, and may be explained either on
the ground that development was only seemingly complete, or that
a brief period must elapse after physical growth is completed before
the period of regular laying can begin. But when laying is retarded
for several months, as it often is, such explanations will not suffice.
Causes of retarded laying. The things which affect growth and
those which affect laying after it has begun are the common causes
of failure to begin to lay at maturity. Little has been done in the
line of scientific investigation of the subject, but ordinary observa-
tion indicates some of these causes, and suggests the need of inves-
tigation to determine how circumstances affecting the development
of the body affect the development of the reproductive organs.
From the commonly observed facts some reasonable general in-
ferences may be drawn.
1. A check to growth at any stage may retard laying at
maturity. Many birds (not only individuals but flocks of all
sizes) do begin regular laying promptly upon attaining full bodily
development. When the situation in a stock of birds of the
same breeding is irregular in this respect, it will usually be found
that the birds which lay normally are those which have grown
without interruption, and that when growth has been in any way
retarded, the beginning of the laying period is retarded. (Appar-
ently, influences unfavorable to the development of the body are
still more unfavorable to the development of the reproductive or-
gans.) It is not unusual to find May-hatched pullets laying earlier
than their sisters a month older, and equal or superior to the earlier
pullets in development at the beginning of egg production. The
difference is explained in most cases by unfavorable weather in
April and early May.
2. Any disturbance affecting the habits, nutrition, or comfort
of a bird at any previous stage of life may retard laying at ma-
turity. That such disturbances so affect and check laying when
the reproductive organs are functionally active (or beginning to be)
292 POULTRY CULTURE
has long been observed. Shifting from place to place and chang-
ing diet are common methods of checking egg production in pullets
which it is desired to keep from laying in order that they may be
in better condition for exhibition or for breeding at a later season.
Recent studies of the reproductive organs of hens at the Maine
Agricultural Experiment Station show that the development of these
organs should be regarded as continuous from the earliest stages of
the growth of the bird, and not, as has been the common view, as a
part of the general development of the bird until the rest of the
organism is complete, and then a special growth of the organs of
reproduction. It has often been observed that pullets just beginning
or about to begin to lay were more sensitive to disturbances and
changes than those that had been laying for some time. From this
it has been generally assumed that at the beginning of functional
activity the reproductive system of the bird was especially sensi-
tive, and that prior to that time the reproductive organs were
not at all sensitive. On this theory the pullets are often handled
less carefully in early life than as they approach the age when they
should begin to produce eggs. This subject cannot be discussed
exhaustively here. So little has it been investigated that knowledge
of it is at almost every point deficient. It can only be treated in
its most obvious phases and in general terms. Although much
relating to it is in doubt, enough is known to show that every con-
dition and circumstance unfavorable to the growth of the body may
still more unfavorably affect the development of the organs of repro-
duction. Every one of the numerous factors unfavorably affecting
growth must therefore be regarded as likely to affect the reproductive
system more seriously, and to delay its functional activity far beyond
the time when growth of the body is complete. This theory explains
many cases of retarded egg production which otherwise seem inex-
plicable. Not all cases of retarded egg production are due to such
remote or indirect causes. In many cases direct causes are found
sufficient to prevent egg production. But when no direct cause can
be found, it may reasonably be presumed that there was a remote
cause (or causes) sufficient to produce the results; and when it is
known, as it often is, that growth was retarded or interrupted, the
cause of that interruption may be considered a sufficient cause for
failure of egg production to begin promptly when growth ceased.
EGG PRODUCTION 293
Conditions of egg production. Factors in laying may be classed
as primary (or essential) and secondary (or accidental).
The prime factor in egg production is activity of the repro-
ductive organs.
Secondary factors are (I) nourishment, (2) regularity, (3) com-
fort, (4) constitution, (5) exercise, (6) cleanliness, (7) broodiness, —
these varying greatly in value, and ranking (as the subsequent
discussion of factors will show) about in the order named.
Activity of the reproductive organs may be considered the
direct cause of egg production. Without it not an egg is produced,
though every other factor is sufficient; when it is present, eggs
may be produced though every other factor is inadequate. It may
be checked by failure of secondary factors, but as long as it con-
tinues, eggs are produced even to exhaustion of the body and of
vitality. If the condition of the reproductive organs of the bird
could be determined by observation, the poultry keeper might judge,
with some approach to accuracy, of the time that must elapse before
a nonlaying bird would begin to lay; but these organs are con-
cealed within the body, and the only outward indications of their
condition are the development and color of the comb, and some-
times the increased activity of the hen and a ‘“‘singing’’ as she
bustles about. None of these signs, however, are infallible. The
proof of activity of the reproductive organs is given only in eggs.
This will appear more clearly as the influences of other factors
are discussed. ;
Nourishment, An ill-nourished bird may produce some eggs,
but cannot continue producing regularly for long periods. To lay
well the bird must be mature, well-nourished at the outset, physi-
cally sound, able to digest much more food than required for its
own maintenance, and must be fully supplied with food. With
activity of the reproductive organs and these conditions of nourish-
ment a bird may continue to lay, though other conditions are faulty ;
but no advantage in other conditions can long compensate for
deficiency in the more essential. A common fallacy, now generally
discarded by students of the subject, makes activity of the repro-
ductive organs dependent for its beginning as well as for contin-
uance upon a surplus of food of proper composition. That this
view is erroneous is evident when, with opportunity to eat all that
294 POULTRY CULTURE
they wish, hens that are not laying eat lightly and keep fat on a
light ration, and when, as the hens begin to lay, the amount of
food consumed is greatly increased. This is most apparent with
old hens that have failed, for a while, to lay under most favorable
conditions, though stimulated in every possible way.
Regularity and conifort are so closely associated that they are
not readily separated for consideration. The general physical con-
dition of a creature is affected by the regularity or irregularity of
its life. Effects of irregularities on particular functions may be still
more marked. The reproductive organs seem especially susceptible
to such influences. Within limits, the comfort of a creature de-
pends as much upon its condition as upon the conditions of its
environment: thus, a debilitated fowl shows that it is uncomfort-
able on a cool morning, when to robust birds the atmosphere is
invigorating and excites greater activity, and a bird that is chilled
cannot keep warm at a temperature comfortable for a bird in per-
fect health. On the other hand, discomfort often causes irregulari-
ties: thus, heat which may not prostrate a bird may be debilitat-
ing, affecting digestion and egg production; cold which a bird
withstands without marked physical discomfort may check laying ;
moving a bird from one pen to an adjacent pen identical with it,
and with all other conditions remaining the same, often checks
laying for days and may stop it for a long period. Irregular feed-
ing unfavorably affects egg production, even though the total
supply is sufficient and of suitable quality. Disturbances in flocks
on account of the presence of a strange person or animal, and un-
usual movements of the attendant, often have an immediate and
marked effect of decreasing egg production. Individual birds vary
greatly in susceptibility to such influences, and the difference be-
tween small, nervous hens, like the Leghorns and Hamburgs, and
large, phlegmatic hens, like the Asiatics, is pronounced. The facts
as to the effects on egg production of irregularities of the kinds
mentioned are accessible to any one who will keep a record of egg
production and of conditions which may affect it; they demon-
strate very clearly the importance of regularity in everything which
may influence laying. Such regularity, complete at every point,
is the exception rather than the rule in the management of lay-
ing stock, nearly every one being careless in some particular.
EGG PRODUCTION 295
Norte. The principal irregularities affecting egg production, considered in the
order in which they usually occur in the management of pullets, are as follows:
(a) The change from summer to winter quarters. Under usual conditions
it is necessary that such a change should be made. While the ideal way is to
start pullets as chicks in the quarters that they are to occupy as layers, the fact
that the old stock, or that part of it which is to be renewed, must usually be
carried until about the time when the pullets are coming to maturity makes it
impossible to do this except in a small percentage of cases. The practical ques-
tion confronting the poultry keeper at this stage is whether it will be more
profitable for him to keep hens that are likely to lay until November, keeping
the pullets out in coops that are perhaps overcrowded, or to dispose of the hens
" (losing the profit on their eggs) and give the pullets every advantage. The pre-
vailing tendency is to keep old hens as long as they lay, or, at any rate, as long
as possible and still leave time to renovate the houses and get the pullets in
before winter. While this is the common practice, it accounts for a great deal
of the poor laying of well-developed pullets in early winter, and experienced
poultrymen are generally agreed that the pullets ought to be not only in winter
quarters but settled there and beginning to lay when winter sets in. In the
latitude of New York this means that pullets so developed as to be likely to
lay by November should be in winter quarters by the first of October. If the
winter houses have large yards attached, pullets taken to them from a good
range may not be much affected by the change. If the yards are small and the
pullets are thus taken suddenly from a free life to cramped quarters, a serious
check to laying may be the result. Pullets so advanced that they are likely to
lay early in October or in September should be put into winter quarters still
earlier. Though it cannot be positively asserted, it is probable that after the
frame of the bird is grown (though not filled out) it is better to put it into
winter quarters than to postpone the change until egg production is (supposed
to be) about to begin. The advantages of range for a longer period may be
more than offset by the disadvantages of a general disturbance of life at that
stage. Apart from effects of changes of quarters, the season is very trying to
birds with any predisposition to roupy troubles. The nights are growing chill;
cold rains are frequent; the weather is sometimes raw and disagreeable for
days at a time.
(6) Change of diet. lf the birds, when on range, have secured much food
by foraging, in the winter quarters they must be supplied with things to fill
out the ration. It not infrequently happens that weeks elapse before the poultry
keeper is giving them a full ration. He is not prepared, or has not time to
properly attend to them. Change of diet and inadequate food, with other
changes, may easily have more serious effects on laying than are plainly
discernible at the time.
(¢) Change of ventilation in the house. Most of the coops used for growing
stock are well ventilated. Many of the houses used for adult stock are not.
Birds inured to bad ventilation may not be seriously affected by it, but few
birds will stand a sudden change from well-ventilated to poorly ventilated
296 POULTRY CULTURE
sleeping quarters without developing roupy symptoms, and sometimes the
most thrifty birds will contract roup in a virulent form under such conditions.?
While not as general as it was a few years ago, it is still too much the practice
to begin, with the first chill and frosty nights, to close poultry houses tight.
Under no circumstances should a poultry house be closed, more than it has
been during the summer, before water will freeze in it at a few feet from the
door. This applies to all kinds of poultry. After such degree of cold is passed,
windows and doors may be partially closed for birds with large, tender combs,
but except in the coldest sections this is not necessary, as far as the hens are
concerned. The open house, for the reasons stated in Chapter 1X, usually gives
the more uniform temperature conditions and insures greater regularity of life.
Constitution. If pullets are physically and sexually mature, well
nourished at the outset and well fed, and if irregularities are
avoided, they should, if they begin to lay about the first of October
and later, continue to lay steadily, and the rate of production for the
individual should be as high then as at any time. To a very great
extent the low averages for flocks at this time result from the pres-
ence of pullets that are not laying. After a few weeks of laying,
differences in constitutional vitality begin to become apparent.
Some birds slow up or stop, and perhaps show loss of weight;
others continue the same rate of laying without noticeable loss of
weight, and perhaps with some gain in weight. Differences due to
constitutional vitality are most marked when comparisons can be
made between selected lots. Unless birds are very deficient in
vitality, the lack of it need not seriously affect the egg yield dur-
ing the first winter. Good care and an abundance of stimulating
food will keep up egg production, though it may shorten the
productive life of the bird.
Exercise affects egg production only through its effects on the
general health and condition of the bird. Hens will lay and lay
well for many months at a stretch with very little exercise, but
eventually the lack of exercise will tell. The effects are not in all
cases the same. Perhaps the most common development is a
gradual softening and weakening of the entire system, most pro-
nounced at first in its effects on the digestive system. Under ordi-
nary feeding hens are likely to lose weight; under very heavy
1 Jt is probable that in such cases the germs of roup are present either in the
houses or in the birds, which were practically immune under good hygienic con-
ditions. That is a point not easily determined in ordinary instances of this kind.
EGG PRODUCTION 297
feeding, with little exercise, they may become very fat while still
laying heavily, —a fact that indicates very high digestive power.
If the birds remain organically sound, improvement of conditions
with respect to exercise is almost immediately followed by the
building up of specimens in poor flesh and the reduction of fat in
others, and by improvement of egg production if that has fallen
off. If there is any organic weakness it is likely to be devel-
oped in birds that are out of condition, and may interfere with
future production.
Cleanliness, in poultry keeping, is a relative term. It cannot be
shown on any broad view of the subject, or on any comparison of in-
stances, that absolute cleanliness, or a condition approximating it, is
always an advantage. The accumulations of dirt in poultry coops
and houses come chiefly from the droppings of the birds, more
or less mixed with earth or sand from the floor, with litter, and
sometimes with waste food. While this is dry and odorless it is
apparently harmless. If wet, it heats and molds. The molds which
form on damp litter are a fertile cause of disease, much more
dangerous to some fowls than the pollution of their food and water.
The more thorough the ventilation in a house, the better will be the
sanitary conditions and the less need of frequent cleaning. The
best guides to the degree of cleanliness that should be maintained
are the condition of the birds and the keeper’s sense of smell. A
house should never get so dirty that hens cannot keep their feet,
their feathers, and the eggs clean. Any offensive odor in a house
suggests need of a search for its cause and the removal of the
offensive matter.
Lroodiness is most aptly described as a negative factor in egg
production. Its characteristic tendency is to limit laying periods
and thereby reduce the annual output of a bird.
Duration of laying periods. Broodiness breaks up the laying
year into a number of short periods, hence the common idea that
eggs are produced in litters and that, having once commenced
laying, a hen (or other female bird) will “lay out her litter.” While
in birds which have the broody character broodiness may tend to
develop as production of eggs ceases, in nonbroody birds production
is influenced wholly by the other factors mentioned. In the most
perfect combination of these factors laying is almost continuous,
298 POULTRY CULTURE
though the rate of production may vary. Ordinarily a nonbroody
hen, having commenced to lay regularly, continues while the com-
bination of factors (most of which are imperfect) is sufficient to
maintain production, then stops, and after a period of recuperation,
begins again, to continue as long as the factors are able to give
the results.
Molting and egg production. In all kinds of poultry except fowls,
and in a large proportion of hens, no eggs are laid during the an-
nual molt. Normally the molt begins in early summer and requires
about four months for its completion. Most hens will lay more or
less during the early stages of the molt, while feathers are dropping
fast and new ones are growing slowly, but nearly all stop entirely
when the new coat is growing rapidly. As molting checks laying,
so laying prolonged into the molting season tends to postpone it.
This may be an advantage when the birds are not to be used a
second season, but the advantage is not generally so clear in regard
to those that are to be kept over. It is a question whether, on the
whole, anything is gained by hens laying through the entire molt.
In the case of very heavy layers there is no doubt that in many
instances the high totals could not be reached if egg production
were not almost continuous. In many cases of moderate laying,
results indicate that the total output might be greater if the bird
did one thing at a time. While always speculating on the phases
of this problem, the poultry keeper working for egg production
habitually exerts himself to get eggs in the present, and lets the
molt and the future laying period come accordingly. Various
methods of forcing molting are sometimes recommended. Some
of these, notably the plan of starving for a period and then feeding
heavily, tend to hasten the shedding of the old coat and the start-
ing of the new, but there is little evidence to show that anything
is gained in egg production. Such interference with the course of
nature would be expected to unfavorably affect the sensitive organs
of reproduction. The usual experience of those who try the experi-
ment is that egg production is stopped, but begins again no sooner
than in birds which perhaps lay several months longer and pass
through the first stages of the molt more slowly.
Variability of egg yields. Egg yields are variable both in inai-
vidual birds and in flocks. The yields of individuals range from 0
EGG PRODUCTION 299
to over 250 by authentic records. Questionable records give still
higher yields. The annual product of an average good layer is
about 12 or 13 dozen eggs a year. The usual average for flocks of
several hundred and upward ranges from 9 to 12 dozen per hen,
10 dozen being considered a good average yield for flocks of several
hundred. High flock averages indicate general uniformity in laying.
Low averages under good conditions indicate very unequal laying,
and either weak stock, bad conditions, or poor selection of stock.
Selection of stock for laying. Selection of layers is a practically
continuous process, beginning with the weeding out of markedly
inferior birds as soon as they are large enough for table use, and
continued by the regular disposal thereafter of all birds that fail to
develop, or that, after having developed and perhaps produced for a
period, go so much out of condition that they seem unlikely to be-
come profitable producers again. In selecting laying stock on this
principle the standard used is the well-developed, vigorous individual
bird. With occasional exceptions, due apparently to ovarian trouble,
the best-developed and best-looking! pullets in a flock prove to be
the best layers. The undeveloped, slow developing, and least attrac-
tive birds are usually distinctly inferior to the others, especially in
comparisons of yields for long periods. The relative proportions
of good, medium, and poor birds selected in this way varies greatly.
In well-bred, well-grown stock the proportion of pullets which
should be discarded at or before maturity ought not to exceed
one in eight or ten, and of the remainder the extra choice and
ordinary birds should be about equally divided. After the culling
out of the inferior 10 per cent or 12 per cent, the general average
production of such a flock of pullets, under good conditions and
management, should be good, with the production of the better half
of the flock averaging one or two dozen eggs per hen more than
that of the poorer half. The better half of the flock should also
show the lower mortality and the smaller percentage of birds going
out of condition. If the stock is indifferently well bred and has not
been well managed, the proportion that are likely to prove profitable
1 Not necessarily the best looking to a fancier who has been educated to
judge by artificial standards, but the birds in the flock which the ordinary per-
son with an appreciation of beauty due to physical development and condition
would consider most attractive.
300 POULTRY CULTURE
layers may be very small. Special points in selecting layers will be
treated in connection with the selection of breeding stock to pro-
duce layers. Systems for selecting layers, based usually on phys-
ical measurements, are unreliable. The trap nest and individual
record are necessary to select the individual producers with cer-
tainty, but such methods are too expensive to be profitably used
with laying stock. Judicious selection on general appearance will
eliminate most of the poor producers. It is usually cheaper to
feed any that this method overlooks than to go to the expense of
identifying them.
Effect of age on production. Age and egg production are not
directly correlated, though they often seem to be. General com-
parisons of records of pullets with older hens, and of records of the
same flock of birds through several years, indicate production at its
highest during the first year, and so rapidly diminishing that only a
small proportion of hens continue profitable layers after the second
year (for the heavier breeds) or third year (for the lighter breeds).
Instances of flocks, as well as individuals, furnishing exceptions to
the general condition are, however, numerous enough to show that
production depends primarily upon constitution and condition, and
upon age only as age affects condition through the cumulative
effects of unfavorable influences and the natural diminution of
vitality. As a rule, only about half the pullets selected for layers
at maturity will pass as rigid a test of condition a year later, and
not more than one fourth of a third of those reserved for a second
winter will pass a third examination. At three years of age, and
even older, hens in good condition may be more valuable for egg
production than the poorer pullets.
CHAPTER XVII
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE
Fattening a finishing process. Poultry in the best condition for
laying or breeding is not in the best condition for market and con-
sumption. For poultry of any quality that is at all fit for food there
is a market. Inferior poultry will usually sell at its full value as
compared with other meats,— often at more than its relative value ;
but such poultry commands no premium, and yields little profit to
the producer. If the amount is small and it has cost him little, he
may sell it at small profit, or even at some loss, without appreciat-
ing how much less he is realizing on it than he would if the qual-
ity were better. When larger quantities are handled, and cost and
selling prices are compared, the advantage of growing and finish-
ing poultry to suit the requirements of the best trade cannot escape
the poultry keeper’s attention.
Fattening improves both appearance and quality. A thin bird
is not at all attractive when dressed; the flesh appears shrunken
and hard, the bones prominent, the skin thin and more or less
shriveled. When cooked, the meat of such a bird is dry and tough
unless the bird is quite young. A bird that is muscularly well de-
veloped (meaty but not fat) is much more attractive in appearance
and much better eating. A fat bird is still better in appearance and
better eating. To this point the majority of consumers’ tastes
agree; beyond it, opinions differ. Only a small proportion of con-
sumers care for very fat poultry, and in America there is practically
no demand for such excessively fat poultry as is produced in some
parts of Europe.
Common practice as to fattening. By far the greater part of the
poultry produced in America is turned off by the producer in an
unfinished state. The young birds grown on farms are usually dis-
posed of when they have reached marketable size, or at the end
of the season, in whatever condition they happen to be. Turkeys
and geese sold for the holiday season are generally given better
301
302 POULTRY CULTURE
preparation than at other times, or than other farm poultry get, but
even of these, enormous quantities of unfinished birds are put on
the market. Of birds, particularly chickens, grown under intensive
conditions, the good specimens are usually much better finished
than those from the farms; the poorer ones are much inferior, —
not only thin but unthrifty or unhealthy looking. As a rule, only
those poultry keepers producing especially for the table (and by no
means all of these) make any well-directed efforts to put poultry on
the market in first-class shape. Among all classes of poultry keep-
ers, however, conditions in this respect are gradually improving.
What has been said so far applies to young poultry. Much of
the old poultry marketed is overfat, perhaps best described as acci-
dentally and improperly fattened. A great deal of it is poultry that
should have been marketed weeks, months, or even years before,
and would have been if the owners had systematically disposed of
their birds as they became unprofitable. Such poultry, though fat,
is not finished, in the proper sense of the term. The fat on it is
usually not well distributed, detracts from rather than adds to the
appearance, and is distinctly inferior in flavor to the fat on a freshly
finished bird.
Simple methods of fattening. Ordinary fattening is accom-
plished by modifications of ordinary feeding conditions and meth-
ods. As already stated, the mere change of the conditions of
feeding by stopping exercise may result in a quite rapid accumula-
tion of fat, though no change is made in the ration. Increase of
the proportion of fattening foods in the ration, the birds still taking
exercise, also tends to make fat. Increase of fattening foods with
restriction on exercise usually causes very rapid fattening, the rate
and amount of fattening being governed very largely by the close-
ness of confinement and the proportion of fat-producing elements in
the food, and limited by the capacity of the bird to continue to digest
food and to accumulate fat under conditions tending to exhaust
vital powers. Finishing in this way is a simple process and (if the
birds have been properly grown up to the finishing stage) so effec-
tive that there is no excuse for putting thrifty young poultry of any
kind on the market in poor condition. All that is necessary is that
birds to be marketed should be separated from the others a few
weeks before (instead of at) the time when they are to be disposed
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE 303
of, and that in the interval they should be kept more closely con-
fined and fed almost entirely on corn in the form most appropriate
to the circumstances and to the kind of poultry to be fattened.
The objection to corn as a fattening food in countries where white
fat and skin are desired does not apply in this country, where yel-
low! fat and skin are preferred. On the South Shore soft-roaster
plants, where most of the chickens grown are destined for market,
the practice is (after weaning) to keep a fattening ration before them
at all times, yet at the same time to allow them all the range that
they want. The ranges used are heavily stocked, but the birds used,
being naturally inclined to put on fat, and being full fed, do not
go far in search of food. With every opportunity to exercise, they
take only enough to keep them in condition, carry at any age
more fat than most well-conditioned chickens, and, as they com-
plete their growth, become as fat, without other special treatment,
as any American trade requires.
Where the principal thing is to grow good stock birds, and only
a part of the poultry is to be finished at one time, the birds to be
finished should be penned up for from ten days to four or five
weeks, according to their condition and the demand to be met.
Broilers to be killed at from two to two and one half pounds
should be taken at about one pound weight (if the chickens have
been on range) and put into small yards or indoor pens. They
should not be too closely crowded, — one bird to about every 5 feet
of yard room or from 24 to 3 feet of inside room. The feed at
first should be the growing ration they have had, all they will eat.
Gradually the proportions of corn and meat elements should be
increased, until, in the last week before they are to be killed, the
most fattening rations mentioned may be given.
Fryers may be handled in the same way, being taken from the
range at from one to one and one half pounds below the weight at
1 Europeans accustomed to (and preferring) white skin and fat in their poultry
consider yellow fat strong and not so fine in flavor. Some American writers,
assuming that the European taste is more highly cultivated, echo this opinion.
American consumers generally prefer the yellow fowls. Custom and prejudice give
rise to the preference. Imagination and occasional instances that fit the theory
confirm both ideas. It is no more possible for a blindfold person to know whether
the chicken that he is eating has yellow or white skin than whether the eggs in his
pudding had white or brown shells.
304 POULTRY CULTURE
which they are to be killed, and being allowed one week for each
half pound of weight to be added. Many birds can be carried much
longer in this way, always in marketable condition and steadily
gaining in growth; but, as a proportion will usually begin to go
off in condition after three or four weeks, it is better not to under-
take to carry them in this way too long. In such matters as this
the poultry keeper must be governed by conditions as they arise.
Roasters are usually well grown before being finished or fattened.
Chickens approaching maturity in good condition may be fattened,
as much as required, in two or three weeks’ yard feeding of ordi-
nary rations containing half corn; by confining more closely and
feeding on corn exclusively, they may be brought to the required
degree of finish in a week or ten days. Fattening is hastened by
darkening the quarters in which the birds are kept. For a week or
ten days, birds of this age being fattened in this way may be kept
in rooms from which the light is excluded except for two or three
periods of from fifteen to twenty minutes each daily, when it is
admitted, that they may see to eat. Under such conditions they
put on fat very rapidly.
Fowls of both sexes past profitable use as producers should be
sold at once if fat. If in good condition, not fat, they may be fin-
ished by close confinement and heavy feeding for a short period,
as just described for roasters. If in poor flesh and requiring longer
feeding, it is better to treat them for several weeks as described for
broilers, and then to finish as above in close confinement.
Ducks to be sold as green ducks are handled in general by the
same methods as broilers, the fattening periods for these two kinds
of poultry corresponding closely. Ducklings (see rations, p. 235)
will stand without injury much heavier feeding than any other
young poultry. As they grow rapidly, so they fatten easily. Indeed,
well-fed ducklings are fat at any time, and with a liberal fattening
ration become very fat as the frame stops growing.
Older ducks (both the young birds held until maturity for table
use and those no longer required for production) are easily fattened
in confinement by heavy feeding — not much different from the
usual ration at first and gradually changed until, for about a week
before killing, they are fed on the same ration as that used for
finishing ducklings. The length of the finishing period must be
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE 305
determined by the condition of the birds at the start and by the rate
of increase of fat.
Geese to be sold as green geese are handled in much the same
way as green ducks, but as goslings require relatively more bulky
green food while growing, the change to the full fattening ration
should be made more gradually, and such birds as show signs of
breaking down (weakness of legs) should be disposed of at once.
Older geese are easily fattened, either by liberal feeding of whole
or cracked corn with grass pasture (good, but not too extended), or
by feeding a standard mash once a day and corn once a day. There
is less need of very heavy feeding with the older geese than with
the green geese. For the latter it is desirable to have the birds
finished as soon as possible after the frame is grown, and before
the last adolescent molt. The finishing period is therefore short,
and rations of the highest efficiency must be used, even at extra
risks. For the older birds more time can be taken. As they will
keep in good condition on pasture, the keeper who has pasture can
extend the finishing period as much as he sees fit, and make the
fattening a slow process.
Turkeys, being of a roving disposition (the young especially being
likely to fret in confinement), are less easily finished for market
than geese. As most flocks of turkeys are handled on farms, the
fattening depends much on conditions not under the keeper’s con-
trol. As the supply of food to be secured by foraging diminishes
in the fall, they are tempted to keep nearer home by more liberal
feeding there. If the weather is seasonable — that is, rather cool
—their appetites are sharpened, and if well fed, they increase
rapidly in size and at the same time put on fat. Their condition
at the time for killing for the Thanksgiving trade depends much
upon the weather during the two months, and especially the few
weeks, preceding. Unseasonably warm weather is unfavorable to
finishing. Whole corn fed freely two or three times a day is the
usual fattening ration, old and young being fed together. Mash,
or dough, is sometimes given once a day to hasten the process,
Causes of failures in finishing by ordinary methods. It is usual
to attribute poor results to the inefficiency of the ration. They are
more likely to be due (1) to the condition of the birds, (2) to condi-
tions unsatisfactory for the process, or (3) to constitutional tendency.
306 POULTRY CULTURE
Birds of low vitality and weak digestion are difficult to fatten, as
they are to develop in any way. Fattening such birds is, if any-
thing, more difficult than growing them. The explanation of this
may be that in the natural course fat is not produced unless every
other existing need is supplied. If not demonstrable, it is still a
reasonable theory that on a ration supplying all the material for
growth that it can use (forcing development at the highest rate of
which the organization is capable), a bird of high functional power
could store up some fat without expense to growth. Many rapidly
growing birds do this even while on range and taking all the exer-
cise that they need. On the other hand, undersized birds are usually
poor in flesh as well as small until growth is completed, and are
not profitable feeders at any age or for any purpose.
Not only should birds undergoing the finishing process be re-
stricted either by confinement or by circumstances, but particular
care should be given to protecting them from alarms, annoyances,
and disturbances of all kinds. These may affect a fattening bird
more seriously than one growing under more normal conditions, or
than a laying hen, because the general effect of the conditions of
the finishing process is physically demoralizing to the bird, which
becomes more and more sensitive to disturbing influences, as the
process continues. Not infrequently poultry being fattened are con-
fined where they are constantly exposed to annoyances. Under such
conditions good results are impossible, except, perhaps, with very
phlegmatic birds. Constitutional tendency has much to do with fat-
tening. In general, the medium-weight and heavy breeds fatten
more readily than the smaller and more active ones, but even in
the breeds with a marked tendency to put on fat many individual
specimens are difficult to fatten, and sometimes whole stocks with
the type and characteristics of such birds will prove very unsatis-
factory when subjected to a finishing process.
Special fattening plants using ordinary methods. Goose-fatten-
ing farms, developed by poultry buyers for finishing geese raised
. principally on pasture, are the only special fattening establishments
using ordinary methods of finishing. Some of these farms have
fattened from ten thousand to fifteen thousand geese a season. The
profits are sometimes very large, but the risk of disease in buying
birds from many sources, and in using the same land year after
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE 307
year, is so great that this line has proved a most precarious one.
Some of the most successful men in it, knowing the risks to which
they were continually exposed, have systematically urged the growers
from whom they were buying to fatten their own geese, and growers
are more and more following this advice, especially when located
near good markets.
Fowls, ducks, and (more rarely) turkeys are sometimes fed in
considerable numbers by buyers in touch with large live-poultry
markets, who take advantage of opportunities to buy cheap and
increase the weight of the birds while holding them for a rise.
Operations of this kind are rather irregular, and, like most specu-
lative transactions, are often unprofitable.
Special finishing methods.. There are two special fattening proc-
esses, crate feeding and cramming. Occasion for special methods
comes in part from the neglect or failure of ordinary methods and
in part from the demand for poultry fatted more than is possible
by ordinary methods. Both processes date from early times and
have long been used in Europe. Several efforts to introduce them
into America have met with very limited and temporary success.
Whatever may be the case in countries where they have been long
established, in America the exploitation of such methods turns
the attention of the producer to the consideration of the advan-
tage of ordinary methods of fattening, and when these are properly
used, there is less material for and less need of special fattening.
Again, while these special methods may sometimes give results
not to be obtained by ordinary methods, they do not do so regularly.
The truest appreciation of their utility is reached by treating them,
not as of proved intrinsic worth and as necessary parts of any
good general system of poultry culture, but as useful (like all other
methods) in proportion to their adaptation to conditions existing
at any time and place.
Crate feeding. The process of crate feeding carries the detail of
finishing by restriction of exercise and by forced feeding farther
than is practicable by ordinary methods, with the birds penned on
a floor. The food used is finely ground grains mixed to about the
consistency of batter and fed in troughs. The use of such food
makes it necessary to keep the birds in small groups, with the
food outside of their compartment, and also to keep them on such
308 POULTRY CULTURE
a floor or bottom that their feet and feathers will be as little
soiled as possible by the soft droppings which the use of such
food makes, and that the coops may require as little attention
as possible. To meet these requirements coops with floors of
slats about 2 inches wide and 2 inches apart are used.
Unlike the ordinary methods of finishing, crate feeding cannot
properly be considered a modification of methods used prior to
the finishing period. It is quite different, both theoretically and
in fact. The practice apparently had its origin not with growers of
poultry but with poulterers, — middlemen, — who saw an oppor-
tunity to make a profit by giving to poultry a better finish than
the growers did. Thus, as a rule, the crate-fed birds are abruptly
changed from one set of conditions to quite different conditions.
Some birds are unfavorably affected by such changes, others are
not and may even be stimulated by a change. The birds that are
not affected by the change and can stand the forced feeding long
enough may be doubled in value in a few weeks at a very low cost
for food and labor. A bird that cannot stand the feeding may lose
value. Success in crate feeding thus depends first on the feeder’s
accuracy in judging which birds will stand the process. This a
skillful feeder can determine within the first two or three days of
crate feeding. The birds not desirable for his purpose can then be
disposed of with slight loss, if not with some profit, and his profit
on the whole transaction be considerable. With poor judgment in
selecting birds for feeding, results may be more unsatisfactory than
when ordinary methods of fattening are used. On this continent
the practice of crate-feeding has thus far been confined to packing
establishments buying in sections where poultry is cheap and not
well finished, and to a few poultrymen here and there whose
opportunities and aptitude for this line of work enable them to
take advantage of the failure of others to finish their product, and
of proximity to good markets. The grower estimating the value
to him of crate feeding must compare results not with prices for
such unfinished birds as are the raw material of the crate feeder,
but with results obtained by the simpler method of pen fattening.
Cramming. The process of cramming carries forced feeding
to its limit, the birds being closely confined and compelled to
swallow food that they do not want. The process is a very ancient
FINISHING POULTRY FOR THE TABLE 309
one, and seems at first to have consisted in forcing the birds to
swallow solid food after their natural appetite led them to dis-
continue eating. This sort of Zand cramming is still practiced to
some extent in Europe. In machine cramming liquid food is forced
into the crop of the bird. This method is sometimes used exclu-
sively and sometimes following a period of crate feeding, forcing
the process beyond what is possible when the bird is free to take
much or little food as it desires. A more uniform product is
secured by cramming, though the best crate-fed stock is said to
be fully as well finished as that which has been crammed.
As would be expected from the relations of the two processes,
cramming is less used everywhere than crate feeding. On this
continent the amount of machine feeding done is insignificant.
The advantages of special finishing methods are generally over-
stated by those advocating them. In a large proportion of the
cases in which remarkable gains in weight are made when birds
are crate or machine fed, much of this gain is growth which would
be made under any good system of feeding. The best showing for
special fattening methods is almost invariably made wth chickens
at the stage of most rapid growth and with good chickens. Special
finishing methods are not, as is popularly supposed, methods for
making good poultry out of really poor poultry. They are used,
supplementing the work of the grower, to shorten the time
required to finish the birds and to put on an extra finish. It is
possible by their use to put much more fat onto birds than by
the ordinary methods of fattening, but here there is no object in
doing this. So far the most conspicuous result of the exploitation
of these methods is to increase the use of the ordinary method
of finishing poultry for market.
Caponizing. In America caponizing is extensively practiced only
in a few districts where growing large roasting chickens is a spe-
cialty. A capon isa castrated cockerel. The effect of the operation
is not (as is popularly supposed) to greatly increase growth. On the
contrary, for the period during which they are usually kept before
marketing, a capon grows no larger than it would if it had not been
operated upon. The object is to keep the young males quiet, to
keep them soft-meated as long as possible, and to make them easier
to fatten. The practice is most common among growers of winter
310 POULTRY CULTURE
chickens to be held for the early summer trade and marketed at
from seven to nine months of age. Most of these are sold not as
capons but as roasting chickens, both capons and pullets being so
designated. Except for the operation these capons are handled
in every way like the pullets grown with them.
Cockerels of Asiatic breeds or of the large general-purpose type
are most suitable for capons. The operation is usually performed
when the chicks are about six or eight weeks old. It must be done
between the time when the testicles become easily visible through
the incision made in the side and the time when they begin to be
functionally active. After that the loss of blood and the shock to
the bird make it inadvisable.
The operation. The testicles of birds, being located internally
and attached to the backbone a little below the middle of the back,
can be removed only through incisions in the sides. Instruments
for caponizing are made by manufacturers of surgical instruments,
and sold by them direct and also through poultry-supply dealers.
Directions for operating are furnished with instruments. The
operation is not particularly difficult for one who has a good eye
and a steady hand. While it may be learned by following instruc-
tions, few become proficient in it without personal instruction and
considerable practice. An expert operator will caponize from forty
to sixty birds in an hour. Chicks of suitable size do not seem to
suffer from the operation. The wounds heal quickly and often
leave no scar visible when the birds are dressed.
Slips are capons which, as they grow, develop to some extent the
sexual characters of which it is the object of the operation to
deprive them. This is due, presumably, to defective operation, but
some good operators declare that with the greatest care they still
have many slips. Slips are not sexually potent, but as they become
hard-meated and “ staggy,” they are marketed as soon as their
character becomes apparent.
CHAPTER XVIII
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS FOR MARKET
Dressed poultry. The number of steps in the preparation of
dressed poultry varies according to the kind of poultry, the choice
of methods, and the disposition to be made of it. The full list is
(1) fasting, (2) killing, (3) scalding, (4) picking, (5) cooling,
(6) shaping, (7) grading, (8) packing.
Fasting. Before being killed, poultry should be fasted (starved
by withholding food and water) for from twenty-four to thirty-six
hours, that when they are killed, the crop, gizzard, and entrails
may be quite empty. This improves the appearance of the car-
cass. A dressed bird with crop bulging at one side of the breast
is not at all attractive looking. Fasting also improves the keep-
ing qualities of the carcass by removing from it offal already in a
state of partial decomposition. Poultry to be used at home need
not be starved, but unless it is to be cooked immediately after kill-
ing, it is better to keep the birds fasting for at least a day before-
hand. Packers of poultry, as well as producers who ship their own
product, sometimes feed and water shortly before killing, to increase
the weight. Apart from the dishonesty of this, it does not always
pay in the immediate returns, and always finally works to the dis-
advantage of those practicing it. In some places, offering poultry
for sale with food in the crop is prohibited by law. Poultry dressed
in this condition will shrink much more in weight during transpor-
tation than poultry that has been properly starved before killing,
and the shipper who follows this practice is constantly in difficulty
with his customers over short weights. The necessary shrinkage
in weight from fasting is very slight, and is more than compen-
sated for by better appearance, better condition, and (usually) by
the better price received.
Killing. When dressed poultry is to be sold in the open markets
the method of killing is determined by the style of dressing
311
312 POULTRY CULTURE
that the market demands. When it is to be used by the producer
or sold direct to consumers, the method easiest for the poultryman
may be used, provided it is not objectionable to consumers. The
common methods of killing are wringing the neck, dzslocating the
neck, cutting off the head, and sticking (with a knife).
Wringing the neck. For birds not too large or too tough, and for one who
has the strength and nerve to do it, wringing the neck is the easiest way of
killing. The head of the bird is grasped firmly in one hand, and the neck is
wrung and the head completely severed from the body in an instant by whirl-
ing the bird by the head, the hand of the person rapidly describing a few short
circles. This is a common method of killing fowls and chickens for immediate
consumption. When done with skill
and on suitable birds, it is as humane as
any method. When unskillfully done,
or tried on birds with strong frames
and tough skin, the usual result is
strangulation without proper bleeding.
Dislocating the neck. Dislocating
the neck is a method popular in Canada
but not used in the United States. The
legs and primary wing feathers are held
in the left hand (asin cutting off the head),
this hand being held near the waist.
The head of the bird is grasped be-
tween the thumb and forefinger of the
right hand, and bent back ata right angle
to the neck, while at the same time, by
a strong but short pull, the neck is broken close to the skull and the wind-
pipe and arteries severed so that the bird will bleed freely. The skin is not
broken, and the blood collects in the neck close to the head and clots there.
Cutting off the head. Cutting off the head is the method of killing most
practiced with poultry that is not to be held long after killing, or not sent to
markets which want birds with heads on. The bird is held in the left hand
by the legs and the primary«wing feathers, the wings being drawn back until
these feathers can be grasped with the legs in the hand. The head is then
laid on a block of wood and severed as close as possible to the juncture of
the head and neck with a heavy hatchet or ax; whichever is used should have
a straight, sharp edge. For killing a few birds occasionally, any block will do,
but if much killing is done, it is best to have a solid chopping block about
two feet high, with a smooth top, the surface of which will not be spoiled
by the hatchet in a short time. After the head is severed, the bird should still
be held in the hand, the neck over the edge of the block, the body held in
this position by the flat side of the hatchet until the bird ceases to struggle,
when it may be placed on the ground without danger of bruising itself in its
Fic. 319. Killing fowl by dislocating
the neck
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 313
struggles. When many birds are killed, it is a good plan to havea pail or
other vessels to catch the blood and prevent its being wasted.
Sticking. Sticking is done with a short,? sharp knife, the cut being made
either in the neck (outside), severing the jugular vein, or in the mouth (inside),
piercing the brain. The latter method is preferred, because the cut is con-
cealed. The bird is sometimes stunned by striking the head against a post or
by striking with a stick on the head or back before sticking, but this tends
to prevent proper bleeding, and is not as commonly practiced as formerly.
The details of- killing by this method vary considerably, particularly as to the
position of the operator and of the bird when the cut is made. These depend
upon the method of picking and upon whether each picker kills his own
birds or whether one person does all the killing for a gang of pickers.
Fic. 320. Sticking fowl held with Fic. 321. Sticking fowl suspended
the hand by the legs
When each picker kills his own birds, one at a time as he wants them, he
usually works sitting down, with a coop of live birds at one side and a box
for feathers at the other, and holds the bird between his knees with the head
extended from him while making the stick. Sometimes, however, especially
when picking large birds not easily stuck in that position, the picker stands
up and holds the body of the bird between his arm and his side, with the head
extended forward in the left hand in a convenient position for sticking.
When one person does the killing for a number of pickers, as is usual
when poultry is scalded, the birds are often suspended in loops, by the feet,
1 The blood may be fed to poultry either separate or in mash.
2 Regular poultry-killing knives are short, but some pickers use a common
butcher knife.
314 POULTRY CULTURE
from a beam, and a hook with a weight attached, inserted in the upper mandible
before the stick is made, prevents struggling. This method is also used in
what is known as string picking, in which the bird is picked while suspended
instead of being placed on a bench or held on the knees of the picker.
Methods of making the stick vary slightly, the object in all cases being
the same, — to penetrate the brain and paralyze the bird (causing the feathers to
loosen so that they are easily removed), and to secure free bleeding. The method
may perhaps be best described as a s¢ad to the brain, well back in the roof of
the mouth (the thrust cutting crosswise), then a /wzs¢ of the knife to bring it into
position, and a s/t forward the entire length of the roof of the mouth. Skill
in sticking depends first on acquiring the knack of it, and then upon practice.
Even a good sticker does not always make a good stick. Diagrams are some-
times given to illustrate the
cut, but it is to be doubted
whether they are of any real
assistance, for it is the sense
of touch, more than any-
thing else, that regulates
the movement of the knife.
The sticker knows when
he has made his thrust right
by a peculiar shiver which
the bird gives and which
he soon learns to recognize
by touch. He presses the
knife to the brain until he
feels this, then turns it and
cuts forward to give the
blood free vent, being careful all the while not to cut through to damage the
outside of the head and, perhaps, his fingers. When the bird is to be dry
picked, the removal of the feathers is begun at once, the object being to have
it picked quite clean before bleeding stops. When the bird is to be scalded,
bleeding should be finished before scalding is done, or the heat may bring the
blood to the skin and coagulate it there, spoiling the appearance of the carcass.
Fic. 322. How ducks are handled when one man
kills and scalds
Scalding. This process is used much more extensively and with
more satisfactory results than would be inferred from a perusal of
most of the special articles and pamphlets on the preparation of
poultry for market. It is the easiest way to remove the feathers.
When properly done the scalded bird presents none of the defects
of poorly scalded poultry, and can be distinguished from the dry-
picked bird only by experts. Done carelessly or by one who does
not understand it, scalding usually results in spoiling the appear-
ance of every bird put through the process.
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 315
How to scald. The first thing in scalding poultry is to have a vessel of
water large enough to allow free handling of the birds. The next thing is to
maintain the water at the desired temperature as long as required. The tem-
perature of the water should be just below boiling. When a single chicken or
a medium-sized fowl is to be scalded, it may be done in 4 twelve- or sixteen-
quart pail, by using enough water, boiling when taken from the stove, to make
the pail a little over half full. In pouring or dipping from the kettle or the tank
to the pail, the temperature of water at the boiling point will usually be suffi-
ciently reduced by contact with the cooler air as the water passes from vessel
to vessel. The bird should be taken by the feet and soused in the water in such
a way that the feathers will be rumpled by the movement and the water will
penetrate nearly to the skin without reaching it. If the bird is to be dressed
with the head on, the head should not be scalded but held in the hand while the
scalding is done. It is not as easy to scald in this way as with the head off, but
with a little care good work may be done. When scalding is done properly,
the effect at the root of the feather is to steam the skin without scalding it.
The time required varies with the condition and density of the feathers. A
chicken or a molting hen may need only a plunge so rapid that the skin is
hardly affected, though the scantiness of plumage allows the water to touch it.
A full-feathered fowl, especially an old one, may require several plunges. The
effect on the feathers is ascertained by plucking a few from the thigh near the
hock joint. If these come easily, there should be no difficulty in removing
the others. Only one or two birds can be scalded in the same water in this way,
but more may be scalded if boiling water is added. For larger birds a boiler
or a tub may be used. Results of scalding in this way are not uniform, how-
ever, and if any considerable number are to be scalded, a set-kettle, under which
a slow fire can be kept, should be used. This gives a body of water large
enough for quick and thorough work in scalding, and after a few trials of the
water on the stock with which he is working, an expert will put most of his
birds through without a blemish due to poor scalding. If a bird has been well
scalded, only the stiff tail and wing feathers need be pulled out. The others will
vub off,except pinfeathers in birds not in full plumage. If handled immedi-
ately after scalding, the feathers are usually a little too hot for the comfort of
the picker. They are removed just as easily after they become cool enough to
handle, and with little greater difficulty at any time within ten or twelve minutes.
Ducks and geese. Waterfowl are much more difficult to scald than other
poultry. Their dense plumage is not so easily penetrated by the water, and the
ease with which the feathers on the thigh are removed is not as accurate an
index of the general condition. A common practice is to wrap them in burlap
(old grain sacks) after scalding, and allow them to steam in the hot, wet feathers
for some minutes before beginning to pick. Even then a supplementary scald is
sometimes necessary, after a part of the feathers have been removed. In pack-
ing establishments steam is often used for scalding, giving a dry scald. The
steam used is sometimes taken from a pipe or a hose, but direct steaming is
said to be more satisfactory. Some of the smaller packing establishments use
316 POULTRY CULTURE
a method of steaming ducks which may be applied anywhere. On a common
round, wide-topped laundry stove is placed a wash boiler with about three or
four inches of water in the bottom; in the boiler is a wooden frame which
holds the bird in the steam without allowing it to get into the water. The bird
is placed in the boiler and steamed for about one and one half minutes on
one side, then turned and steamed for about the same length of time on the
other side.
In picking ducks and geese powdered rosin is sometimes used to assist
in removing the fine down left after the outside feathers are removed. The
rosin is rubbed onto the down, which mats, and is then more easily removed.
Fic. 323. First step in lap picking: FIG. 324. Second step in lap picking:
stripping feathers from breast stripping feathers from thigh
In scald picking the picker usually works standing, with the bird ona table
or a bench before him, and rough picks with the Aazds and the fronds (not the
zips) of his thumbs and fingers. Most pickers remove stiff tail and wing feathers
first, but some leave them until the last. It makes little difference. The im-
portant thing is for the picker to have a systematic way and to pick clean as
he goes, except for stubs and pinfeathers, which must be removed one by one.
Dry picking. The removal of the feathers without wetting is the
method favored by most eastern markets, and is best adapted to
poultry that is to be kept in storage. It may be done at any time
after killing. Pigeons and guineas and game birds of all kinds are
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 317
marketed with the feathers on. In general practice with poultry,
however, dry picking is done while the bird is dying, when it has
lost consciousness and is insensible to pain, but when the relation
between nervous and muscular systems still continues. Good work
in dry pitking depends first upon the proper sticking of the bird."
Note. When the sticking is well done, the feathers come off quite as easily
as with good scalding, but with a poor stick they come harder, and an inexpert
picker is likely to break the skin and perhaps tear the birds badly. As in scald
picking, the picker works
as much as possible with
his hands, wetting them
at intervals to make the
feathers stick to them,
removing the feathers in
handfuls, rubbing them off
and unless pinfeathers are
verysmall, taking them with
the others. The pinfeathers
and stubs that are not taken
in this way must be re-
moved one by one. For
this (in both methods) the
professional picker uses
a short knife, either seizing the stub between his thumb and the blade, or
shaving it off. Practice, and a certain aptitude for such work, are required to
Fic. 325. Gang of poultry pickers dressing geese
1 The principle upon which this process is based is best explained by refer-
ence to a phenomenon which every one with a little experience in handling poul-
try has had occasion to observe. If in catching a bird one grasps it by the tail,
some of the feathers are likely to be pulled out, and if the hold is only on the
feathers, the bird will probably escape. If the bird is caught by the thigh, unless
the hand quickly closes very tightly on it, a good many feathers may be pulled
out just by the action of the closing of the hand on the leg, and by the momentum
of the bird. Not infrequently, when caught by the back with so insecure a hold
that the person catching it feels that he has hardly more than touched the bird, it
loses feathers. Considering how hard these feathers usually are to get out when he
wants them removed, the poultry keeper always feels somewhat surprised at the
ease with which they come out under these circumstances. There is plainly a
direct relation between the mental condition of the bird and the tenacity of the
feathers. When the bird is in a state of fright, the feathers loosen, and their
loosening may enable the bird to escape. The same effect on the feathers is
secured by paralyzing the bird by stunning or by piercing the brain. It is also
secured when the bird is killed by dislocating the neck, or by wringing the neck,
or by beheading, though in the last two cases the complete severance of the head
makes it impossible to direct the flow of blood and begin picking immediately,
and so the feathers are relaxed a second time by scalding.
318 POULTRY CULTURE
make a good, fast picker. Af/ztude consists largely in working methodically
when removing the feathers, and in picking as clean as possible at every step.
As to the division of the work, practice varies largely according to the quality
of help to be obtained. Where enough capable pickers can be obtained, each
finishes his own bird; where the supply of good pickers is short, the skilled
pickers often rough pick the birds and employ less expert persons to remove
the stubs and pinfeathers.
Scalding and dry picking compared. After the knack of sticking is acquired,
dry picking is often more convenient. Unless the bird is properly killed, it is
usually much easier for a novice in picking to get the feathers off by scalding,
even if he has to build a fire and wait for the water to heat. In the results of
inexpert use of the two methods there is little to choose, but, judging by the
comparative scarcity of good scalders, it is much easier to acquire the knack of
sticking than to learn to scald right. A poor scalder is apt to disfigure all his
birds and, if he has never seen poultry well scalded, to think that it is unavoid-
able. In dry picking it is not possible to miss seeing the difference in good and
poor work, the inexpert picker’s great difficulty being to avoid tearing the skin.
He can therefore judge his own work better, and with practice is almost sure
to become passably expert. Dry-picked poultry is said to keep longer in cold
storage than even the best scalded poultry. For use within a few weeks after
killing, the advantage of dry picking over good scalding is not apparent. The
use of methods, however, is not a matter of choice with the producer who
dresses his own poultry. He must follow the custom in his market, and scald
pick or dry pick, or perhaps do some of both, according to the disposition
to be made of his stock.
Market requirements as to picking. The large eastern city mar-
kets and pleasure resorts prefer dry-picked poultry. Inland, western,
and southern markets, almost without exception, want the poultry
for local consumption scald picked ; but at many of these points
poultry shipped to eastern markets is dry picked. Customs, how-
ever, are not consistently governed by the market preference ; con-
ditions affecting shipment and the disposition of the goods may
determine the method, and the poultry trade presents some striking
anomalies in practice at this point. Thus, while the East prefers dry-
picked poultry, a large proportion, perhaps the greater part, of the
ducks produced there are scalded. Eastern turkeys are often scalded,
while western turkeys for the eastern market are mostly dry picked.
Poultry from the states in the Mississippi Valley east of the river is
often scalded, even by the packers, for the eastern market ; while in
the states west of the river the poultry going east is all dry picked.
The poultry from points nearest the market, reaching it quickly and
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 319
likely to be consumed at once, is scalded (that being the cheaper
method), while that which takes longer to reach the market and is
not so likely to find ready sale, and may have to go into cold storage,
is dry picked (that being the method which best insures its keeping).
At bottom it is not so mucha question of method as of good
work by either method. Good poultry marketed in good condition
will bring about the same price scalded or dry picked, when the
demand is brisk, but when trade is dull, poultry dressed by the
method not favored in a market is hard to move on that market.
Importance of proper cooling. In respect to its effect on quality,
cooling is the most important part of the preparation of poultry
for food. Enormous quantities of good poultry are damaged
or spoiled entirely because not properly cooled when killed. The
object of cooling is to remove the animal heat and check decom-
position. The sooner the body is cooled, the longer it will keep
and the better will be the texture and flavor of the meat. In cold
weather, poultry may be cooled in the air (dry cooled). When the
temperature is too high for rapid cooling in the air, poultry is
cooled first in water of the ordinary temperature at which it comes
from the well or hydrant, and then in ice water. Cooling the warm
body suddenly in ice water is less effective than beginning with
water of a higher temperature. It is supposed that too rapid chill-
ing at the surface diminishes its conductivity and allows the animal
heat inside to start decomposition more actively. Whenever it can be
done, dry cooling is preferred to cooling in water. When the days
are warm and the nights cool it is usual to put poultry into water
in barrels, tubs, or tanks as soon as killed, and at night to hang it
up or place it on racks to finish cooling. The killing should always
be timed so as to give poultry sufficient time to cool before being
packed. When it is to be shipped only a few hundred miles or packed
in ice, cooling for a night and a part of a day (according to the time
of killing) should be enough. If the poultry is to be shipped dry
packed for a long distance, it should be more thoroughly cooled.
It is of much more importance that poultry should be well cooled
before a long shipment than that it should be started on its journey
quickly. The condition of the poultry at the start is a more important
factor in its keeping than the time in transit. Packers nearly a week
from their market cool poultry two or three days before shipping.
320 POULTRY CULTURE
Shaping. The operation of shaping is done sometimes as the
birds are cooling, sometimes as they are packed. The object is to
make the bird appear as plump as possible. The advantage is
greatest with poultry in fair condition but not noticeably well
meated. In Europe a number of methods of shaping are practiced,
some even going so far as to wrap each bird tightly in cloth while
cooling. A more common method there, used to some extent in
Canada, is to place the birds in a squatting position in V-shaped
troughs, with a weight on the back of each bird. A similar but
simpler method is used by some packers in the United States, the
birds being held ina squatting position on a rack by strips from 1} to
2 inches high, about 6 or 8 inches apart in front and coming together
at the rear, a board the length of the rack serving as a weight for
all the birds on it. With good, plump stock there is little occasion
for such shaping for American markets. The object of it is evi-
dently deceptive, — to press in the breast and hip bones and give
an appearance of greater meatiness than exists. Good stock does
not need this treatment for these markets. All that is necessary is
to pack in such position that the carcass will present a symmetrical
appearance and show for just what it is.
Grading. The proper sorting and grading of dressed poultry is
of less importance to the ordinary producer than to the packer,
but still it should have his attention. Packers make many grades,
according to weight, quality, condition, etc. Producers marketing
their own poultry usually make no more than three grades of any
one kind of poultry, — firsts, seconds, and cz//s, — and unless oper-
ations have been very unsuccessful, the proportion of seconds and
culls should be small.
Firsts are choice, well-finished birds, not damaged in dressing.
Seconds are slightly inferior birds, and firsts slightly damaged
in dressing.
Culls are decidedly poor and badly damaged birds.
Whether selling single birds to individual consumers or selling
in quantity, the poultry keeper should carefully avoid putting in-
ferior stuff with his better grades. The object of grading is not to
pass off all that he has with the highest grade that it can get by, but
to assort it in conformity with the general scale of prices and de-
mands of the trade. There is nothing to be gained in money by
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 321
grading poultry too high. There
is more likely to be a loss, for the
inferior birds packed with those
of a better grade detract from the
appearance of the lot and often
reduce the price. In addition to
grading each kind of poultry,
the shipper should keep different
kinds, though of like quality, sep-
arate, and as far as practicable
should have each package of
birds uniform in size. It is much
easier to do this now, when small
packages are in vogue, than it
was when most poultry was packed in barrels and large boxes.
Packing. Two methods of packing are used, — dry packing
and ice packing, the former being employed when weather and
distance permit, and the latter when there is danger of poultry
spoiling in transit un-
less iced.
Dry-packed poultry
is mostly shipped in
boxes. For irregular
and small shipments
any clean second-hand
box of convenient size
may be used. For
regular shipments of
choice poultry it is
better to use special
boxes holding one or
two dozen birds, and of
dimensions to suit the
sizes of the birds. For
regular short-distance
shipments (by express)
of poultry going into im-
Fic. 326. The side pack, — roasting
chickens
: : Fic. 327. Style of packing fowls for export. (Pho-
mediate consumption _tograph from United States Bureau of Chemistry)
322 POULTRY CULTURE
it is best to use returnable boxes very substantially built, with
covers held in place with bolts and nuts, and with handles on the
ends for convenience in lifting. For long-distance shipments and
for lots which it may be desired to hold in storage, such light boxes
as the poultry packers use are more suitable. Packers making many
grades of poultry and assorting carefully as to size use boxes of
different dimensions, to fit one or two dozen birds of each size.
The producer will usually find it more satisfactory to use a few
standard-sized boxes adapted to the sizes of birds of which he ships
most, putting fewer large birds, and a large number of small ones,
in a box. While the dozen is a convenient numerical division,
poultry nearly always is sold by weight! and even when the trade
prefers one- or two-dozen lots, an occasional package containing
less or more than the round number will sell as readily as the rest.
Styles of box packing are shown in Figs. 326-328.
STANDARD SIZES OF BOXES
Inches inside
For 12 broilers, 24 lb. and under per dozen . » 16x15 x3h
For 12 broilers, 25 to 30 lb. per dozen . . I7xXI6x4
For 12 chickens, 30 to 35 lb. per dozen ISx17x4
For 12 chickens, 43 to 47 lb. per dozen 21x 19x 43
For 12 roasters, 48 to §9 lb. per dozen. 19x 16x8
For 12 fowl, 54 lb. and upward per dozen. . . I9x16x8
For 12 ducks, 54 lb. per dozen . . . 19x 16x8
For 12 fowl, 60 lb. per dozen. . . sj . 18x17x9g
For 12 fowl, 38 Ib. and under per dozen I4x12}x7
For 12 chickens, 30 to 40 lb. per dozen rg}x14x6}
For 12 average turkeys or geese . F { 3 2 WIR LT
Boxes for the smallest birds may be made of 14-inch stuff for sides, and
34-inch for ends; boxes for birds of medium weight, of 2 inch stuff for sides
and inch for ends; those for heavy-weight birds, of 4 inch stuff for sides
and t inch for ends. If many boxes are needed, it will pay to buy regulation
sizes in knockdown bundles, or, if there is a box factory near to have stuff got
out to measure there and put it together as wanted. Sometimes empty packing
cases of suitable material can be bought so cheap that the poultryman can afford
to cut them up and make his own packing boxes at odd times.
1 There are a few places where birds are sold at so much af/ece, or so much a
dozen, without regard to weight.
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 323
There are two principal points to be observed in packing : (1) that
the birds be packed solidly, so that they will not shift when the
package is handled; (2) that the package, when opened, present
an orderly arrangement and show the goods to advantage. The
removal of the cover should show either all breasts, all backs, or all
sides, and legs, heads, and wings all in the same relative positions.
Ice-packed poultry is usually shipped in large barrels. A layer
of clean chipped ice is first placed on the bottom of the barrel,
Fic. 328. Two outside top boxes, standard roaster pack ; top center and bottom
row, standard broiler pack. (Photograph from the Bureau of Chemistry, United
States Department of Agriculture)
then a layer of poultry, packed in a circle with backs up and feet
toward the center, the poultry nowhere touching the sides of the
barrel ; then a layer of ice and another layer of poultry, and so
on until the barrel is full to within six inches of the top, when it
is filled with larger pieces of ice and covered with bagging. In
very warm weather a large chunk of ice put on top (under the
bagging) will add to the safety of the shipment. Poultry thor-
oughly cooled before packing, and properly packed and iced, should
‘be safe for two days’ shipment by express or for four or five days
324 POULTRY CULTURE
in arefrigerator car. Natural ice is better for packing poultry than
artificial ice, because it melts faster, and the cold water percolating
through the layers of poultry keeps them at a uniformly cool tem-
perature. If the ice melts too slowly, the poultry may arrive at its
destination in poorer condition with much ice remaining than if
the ice has all melted.
Feathers. Wherever a considerable quantity of poultry is dressed
it will pay to save and sell the feathers. The feathers of ducks
and geese, if handled and disposed of properly, should pay for the
picking. Other feathers are less valuable but still worth taking
care of. Stiff and soft feathers, white and colored feathers, and the
‘feathers of each kind of poultry should be kept separate. The
feathers from dry-picked stock are usually in better condition than
those from scalded stock, but with a little care scalded feathers can
be cured so that they will sell well, though not as prime feathers.
The wing and tail feathers require no curing; the body feathers
should be placed in bins or in a loft and forked over at intervals
until the quills are thoroughly dry.
Shipping live poultry. Ventilated coops with solid bottoms and
open sides and tops, made of slats or wire netting over a frame, are
used for shipping live poultry. Standard coops used by large ship-
pers are made of hardwood strips reénforced with twisted wire, —
for fowls, 2 x 3 feet, 12 inches high; for turkeys, 2 x 3 feet,
16 inches high. A coop with a 2 x 3 feet bottom is large enough
for a dozen medium-sized fowls, and for from one to two dozen
chickens, according to size. Filled with live poultry it makes as
large and as heavy a package as can be easily handled by one man.
This is the size preferred by commission men and expressmen ;
but many shippers make a larger coop, with floor from 30 to 36
inches wide by 4 feet long, usually with a partition in the middle.
These coops are usually homemade. Poultry is not often shipped
in coop lots over distances so great that the birds must be fed and
watered in transit. Long-distance shipments are usually made by
middlemen either in cars especially fitted for poultry, or with an
attendant to feed and water on the journey.
Sorting and grading. Uniformity is as important with live as
with dressed poultry. The birds shipped in a coop (or in a com-
partment of a double coop) should be of the same kind and as
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 325
nearly as possible of the same age, size, and weight. It is also an
advantage to have them of the same color, for, while color is not
of such importance in market as in fancy poultry, as far as it con-
tributes to uniformity of appearance it makes a lot more salable,
and often brings a little better price. In general it is advisable to
have each lot of the same sex, — especially in fowls past broiler
size. Grading is less essential when shipping to buyers who dress
to sell than when shipping to firms which sell the birds alive.
Concerns dressing poultry and buying direct from producers will
usually sort mixed lots as they kill and make returns accordingly.
Eggs. The preparation of eggs for market is the simplest of
matters. They must be whole, clean, assorted for color and size,
and packed in packages of suitable size. As marketed by a pro-
ducer they should always be fresh. If a poultry keeper wishes,
either for experiment or for home use, to preserve eggs, that is
solely his own affair. If he undertakes to sell at the same time
preserved and fresh eggs, he will soon find that all his eggs are
under suspicion and that he has damaged his best trade. The
poultry keeper who wants to make a reputation for good eggs, and
to get the highest prices, should keep rigidly to the practice of
selling only fresh eggs.
Cleaning eggs. If the poultry houses are clean, the nests kept
in good condition, and the hens laying eggs with good shells, the
proportion of eggs requiring cleaning before being marketed should
be small. As far as possible, wetting the shell is to be avoided, for
it destroys the “bloom” which is the conspicuous, distinguishing
feature of the fresh egg, disappearing with age and handling. If
an egg is only slightly soiled it may sometimes be cleaned by rub-
bing lightly with a dry cloth. If this does not answer, a slightly
moistened cloth may remove the dirt. Eggs that are badly soiled
should be washed in warm (not hot) water, and dried at once with
a soft cloth. The warm water removes the dirt more quickly than
cold, and eggs washed in warm water are more easily dried. No
soap or other cleansing preparation should be used, — only clean
water. If the shell is stained, as sometimes it is, with manure or
from being wet in the nest, it is better to keep the egg for home
cooking. It is not injured ‘except in appearance, but it is salable
only as a “dirty” at about half price.
326 POULTRY CULTURE
Sorting eggs for color. Uniformity in the color of the shell
is desirable, even though the market has not a color preference.
Mixed lots of eggs do not look as well or sell as readily as lots
of uniform color. Eggs aré classed according to color, as white,
gray, and brown.
White eggs are not, as a rule, of a dead-white color, though that
is sometimes found ; they are nearly always slightly tinted. Eggs
that are uniform in color and look white unless closely compared
with something whiter may be classed as white.
Gray eggs are eggs that are plainly not white, yet not dark
enough to be considered brown. The color of the shell usually
tends toward black rather than toward red or brown, but extremely
light-brown eggs may be classed as gray.
Brown eggs exhibit a wide range of color, from a light, golden
brown to a reddish chocolate. Ordinary brown eggs are light
brown. What are known to the trade as dark-brown eggs are
mostly medium in the range of shades of brown found in eggs.
Very dark-brown eggs are comparatively rare and are not often seen
in quantity. Commercially, the darkest-brown eggs are not favored
beyond the ordinary dark brown eggs. Where the range of shades
is so wide the uniformity of color presented by ordinary white eggs
graded with a little care can be secured only by a more discriminat-
ing selection than it is usually practicable to make. For all ordi-
nary trade purposes it is enough to make two grades of brown
eggs, light and dark (medium), discarding, as not brown, the white
or gray eggs sometimes laid by brown-egg stock, and packing the
darkest eggs with the medium. An appearance of greater uniform-
ity of color may be secured by a little care in placing the eggs so
that those of different shades are not placed at random but arranged
according to shade, — not so accurately that the shades blend per-
fectly, but with care to avoid marked differences in shades of eggs
in adjoining compartments.
Grading for size. Grading for size consists principally in dis-
carding from lots designed for ordinary trade all very large and all
very small eggs. The compartments of boxes and cases used for
packing eggs for market are usually of pasteboard sufficiently elastic
to allow the larger eggs to spread thé sides of the compartment,
the smaller eggs being placed in the adjoining compartments ; but
PREPARATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTS 327
eggs that are so long that they project above the filler are almost
sure to be broken, because the board between the layers of eggs is
less elastic and because, when the lower layer is covered, it is not
possible to adapt short eggs in one layer to long ones in the one
below. Eggs that are too long for the fillers should not be packed
in them. A distinction should, however, be made between a long
egg of ordinary width which cannot be placed so that its end will
not project from its compartment, and a long, narrow egg which
will fit diagonally into the compartment. Of eggs that are too wide
for the compartments, as many may be used as can be put in with-
out danger to those in adjacent compartments. Provided the shell
is strong, an egg of suitable size need not be discarded for any of
the common eccentricities of shape, as corrugated shell or marked
departure from the oval form.
In a general way the size of the compartment in the standard
egg box and case regulates the size in grading choice eggs. Eggs
weighing from twenty-five to twenty-eight ounces to the dozen will
fit into the fillers with very few to discard because too large or too
small. Eggs weighing more than twenty-eight ounces to the dozen
will have a larger proportion of those too large for the fillers. Eggs
weighing less than twenty-five ounces to the dozen will contain
many so small that when packed the compartments seem only half
or two thirds full. Small eggs never show to poorer advantage than
when packed in this manner.
Egg cases and boxes. The standard wholesale package for eggs
is a light wooden box, or case, with two compartments, each hold-
ing fifteen dozen eggs, — thirty dozen to the case. Cases of simi-
lar construction holding thirty-six dozen are also used, but not so
extensively. In general trade the cases are sometimes returnable
and sometimes sold with the eggs. Both producers and collectors
making regular shipments of strictly fresh eggs often use more
substantial cases, always returnable; marked with their own stencil,
and such cases are sometimes painted a distinctive color. For ship-
ment by ordinary express, they are safer than the light trade case,
though the latter is as good or better for carload lots and for storage.
For retailing eggs in original packages smaller cases are used.
Where a consumer uses considerable quantities, but less than a case
weekly, — say from fifteen to twenty dozen, — the poultry keeper
328 POULTRY CULTURE
who supplies him often uses a one-compartment case just half the
standard size, for fifteen dozen, and for a larger number makes or
has made boxes that will hold just the required number and has
the consumer’s address as well as his own painted on the boxes.
For smaller lots to be shipped by express, smaller boxes are made,
holding from two to ten dozen. For eggs to be delivered direct
from producer to consumer the cheap pasteboard egg boxes (hold-
ing one dozen each) which retail grocers and provision dealers use
are commonly used by poultrymen. For those who require large
quantities of them manufacturers will print on the boxes special
labels or designs, which add to the attractiveness of the package
and also advertise the goods. However small the quantity of eggs
to be sold, the most satisfactory way to handle them is to pack
them in boxes.
CHAPTER XIX
MARKETING POULTRY PRODUCTS
Poultry keepers and middlemen. To dispose of his produce with
the largest possible profit to himself is the aim of every poultry
keeper. It is commonly assumed that this is best accomplished by
dispensing with middlemen and selling direct to the consumer,
and that every time a middleman is eliminated from the number
concerned in the collection and distribution of eggs and poultry,
the producer is benefited. Under some circumstances this may
be true; considering the interests of the producer in particular
instances, it will often appear that he makes much larger profits
by selling direct to consumers than by selling through middlemen.
Broader comparisons of results, however, indicate that study of
such special instances may be misleading. It has been shown that,
in general, a poultry business is limited to what one man can
manage with the (usually) very limited help he can rely upon.
When a man conducting such a business undertakes to sell direct
to consumers, he often finds that it costs him more to sell his
produce than it does the middlemen, and that he can make more
money by giving all his time to production and selling his products
through the ordinary channels, — he, of course, taking every advan-
tage that he can without himself retailing his goods. A poultry
keeper whose opportunities or facilities for production are limited
may find it to his advantage, and perhaps necessary, to sell his
produce direct to consumers, but one who is in a position to extend
productive operations to the limit of his ability to handle them will
almost invariably make more money by giving as much as possible
of his time to production and intrusting the selling of his produce
to reliable persons whose specialty is selling. This is a natural
division of labor brought about by the conditions of production
and distribution and by differences in men. The best producers
of poultry are rarely good salesmen. In the most thriving poul-
try districts producers generally devote themselves to production,
329
330 POULTRY CULTURE
selling their produce at wholesale, not even dressing their poultry.
As a matter of historical fact the men buying and shipping the
poultry of a district are the most important factors in the develop-
ment of the poultry interests of that district.
Collection and distribution of poultry products. The trade in
poultry products proceeds along lines generally parallel to and
sometimes coincident with the movement of other provisions.
Eggs. A poultry keeper producing more eggs than his family
can consume naturally looks in his vicinity first for an outlet for
his surplus. If he is in a community where a considerable propor-
tion of families do not keep poultry, he may easily sell all that he
has direct to consumers, perhaps getting a premium for his eggs
as strictly fresh. If the eggs are sold at the door, or if the producer
can deliver them without devoting an appreciable amount of time
especially to it, the cost of delivery need not be considered. The
quantity of eggs which can be disposed of to consumers in this
way is usually very limited. Larger quantities may be disposed of
direct to retailers, or to hotel, restaurant, and soda-fountain trade, at
correspondingly high prices and with little expense for delivery,
though the trade of this class is not as large as is usually supposed,
these places generally using much larger quantities of candled than
of strictly fresh eggs.
When a community produces a surplus of eggs, only those
poultry keepers producing in such quantities that they can make
‘ This is true both as to the industry at large and as to special branches in
limited districts. Poultry packers throughout the West have for years worked
systematically to induce and help farmers to improve their poultry. They have
made it a practice to select the finest market-type cockerels from the poultry
brought to them and to sell these to persons bringing them poor poultry. They
have even bought thoroughbred cockerels of good utility types and exchanged
with farmers on the basis of prices paid them for ordinary stock. For years some
large packing plants made a practice of advertising, a week in advance, the prices
that they would pay for poultry, thus insuring the seller against a fall in prices while
his stock was en route. Ona smaller scale the same thing was done by buyers in
the South Shore district of Massachusetts. The buyers there not only distributed
good breeding males but in every way endeavored to aid the producers to make a
first-class product and to dispose of it to the best advantage, paying at their doors
the highest price that they could give for poultry, not the lowest that the producer
could be persuaded or forced to take. Under such circumstances the producer
could give all his attention to making the product, knowing that as fast as it was
ready for market, the buyer would take it off his hands, and his final profits would
be much larger than if he had sold to consumers direct.
MARKETING POULTRY PRODUCTS 331
frequent periodic shipments in case lots can, as a rule, afford to ship
their own eggs.! In such circumstances it becomes necessary that
some should collect and ship the eggs of others. The collector
may be himself a producer; this is most likely to be the case in
communities within easy shipping distance of a large market. At
other points the volume of poultry products to be handled usually
determines whether the collector will handle poultry products ex-
clusively or with other lines of produce. If the poultry production
of the community is small, the eggs are likely to be taken in bulk
at the grocery or general store, packed in cases, and sent either
direct to a large receiving center or to an egg and poultry packer
at a nearer point. If the community produces enough surplus poul-
try products to maintain a depot for collecting them, it will have
one or more concerns engaged exclusively in buying, preparing, and
shipping poultry products, or in handling these with such lines as
butter and cheese, — sometimes one, sometimes another line being
of first importance. Many creameries handle eggs as well as milk.
These various agencies handling eggs sometimes collect and some-
times are simply receivers, that being determined by local custom
or by individual interest.
Most of the eggs gathered in this way go into the general mar-
ket through commission houses in the large cities, but large pack-
ing houses also handle enormous quantities. Eggs going to the
commission houses are sold direct to large consumers, hotels, res-
taurants, and bakeries, to retailers, and also to jobbers, who in turn
sell to retailers. Thus, between the time when it is laid, on a west-
ern or southern farm, and the time when it comes to the table in
an eastern city home, an egg may have a history as follows : (1) sold
to country store; (2) shipped to nearest egg depot; (3) sent to
city commission house; (4) sold to jobber; (5) sold to retailer ;
(6) bought by consumer ; and in going from the farm to the table it
may travel several thousand miles, now by wagon, now by rail, and
be subjected to many handlings and one or two candlings before
it reaches the end of its journey. If it goes into cold storage, or
if a glut in one market leads to its being shipped to another, the
number of transfers may be still greater.
1 Exceptions are instances where a small producer can develop a small family
trade in a near-by city.
332 POULTRY CULTURE
To the producer (and to the consumer also) it often seems that
too much of the difference between the first and last selling prices
goes to middlemen and transportation companies, but taken by
and large the system is adapted to the conditions and is here
relatively simple, there more complex, because of the influence of
distance and of the facilities for collection, transportation, and
distribution on the laws of supply and demand.
As a rule, the movement of supplies from producer to consumer
is as direct as conditions permit, and current prices at any point
are based on the cost of the general supply at that point. In a
community where a surplus of eggs and poultry is produced, the
consumer gets a considerable part, if not all, of the advantage of
nearness to sources of large supply. In or near a community which
buys most of its poultry products at a distance, the producer should
get by far the larger proportion of the last selling price of his product.
In either case the situation is exceptional, and the advantage is de-
pendent upon that fact. Where the supply of the near-by product
is comparatively small, and supplies from a distance are of uncertain
quantity, the average quality of the near-by product will be enough
better to make it at nearly all times worth more than all but the
finest lots of produce from a distance. In addition there is always,
in such communities, a proportion of consumers willing to pay a
premium for near-by produce of guaranteed quality, and a much
smaller proportion that will pay a very large premium for strictly
fresh poultry products, especially for eggs direct from the producer.
The poultry keeper located where he can get this trade must figure
the expense of catering to it, not in comparison with ordinary
market prices, but in comparison with the best wholesale prices
that he can get for the same class of goods. As a rule, it will be
found that the private trade is more profitable only when it is pos-
sible to secure customers buying both eggs and poultry regularly
in considerable quantities, and that selling to large retail groceries
is the most satisfactory way of disposing of choice eggs in large
quantities. There are, however, so many places, particularly pleas-
ure resorts, where a poultry keeper conveniently located can get
extra prices for his produce for a long season each year, that be-
fore going to this class of stores he should thoroughly canvass
his opportunities for selling direct.
MARKETING POULTRY PRODUCTS 333
Live poultry is assembled for market in almost the same way as
eggs. The necessity for promptly forwarding it to the point where
it is to be converted into dressed poultry tends to reduce the num-
ber of persons handling it in the stages of collection. In distribu-
tion, too, there is some difference. Live poultry is retailed almost
wholly, and dressed poultry principally, by meat markets, while
the grocery stores handle much larger quantities of eggs than the
markets. Thus poultry moves in narrower channels of trade than
eggs. In districts shipping large quantities of poultry to distant
markets, the poultry is likely to be delivered by producers at re-
ceiving depots, — often the same to which eggs are taken, though in
many places, where the poultry-shipping season is short, the depots
do not handle eggs. Elsewhere collections are more likely to be
made by carts taking only poultry, or eggs and poultry, according
to circumstances.
The greater part of the live poultry is dressed soon after leaving
the producer, but large quantities are shipped alive to distributing
points and even sold alive to retailers and consumers, for there
is a large element of buyers that either want to see their poultry
before it is killed, or want it killed in a particular way. In some
places it is customary for the consumer to select birds from a coop
of live poultry at the butcher’s, and have them killed and dressed
especially for him, sometimes waiting to take them away with him.
Wherever there is a large Jewish population there is great demand
for live poultry. Indeed, this demand is the principal factor affect-
ing the live-poultry market. But for Jewish ceremonial require-
ments the shipping of live poultry farther than the first convenient
killing and packing house would probably soon cease.
Dressed poultry is received at poultry depots at some seasons,
particularly for Thanksgiving and Christmas trade, but is not col-
lected as live poultry and eggs are. It would be almost impossible
to adjust to the visits of the “hen cart” the fasting, killing, and
cooling of the poultry of many producers along a route. Poultry
dressed by the producer is (or should be) sold in advance, and the
preparation and shipping timed so as to have the shipment reach
its destination just when wanted.
Relative advantages of selling poultry alive and dressed. Ina
district where the aggregate production of market poultry is large,
334 POULTRY CULTURE
but the individual production comparatively small, it will usually be
to the advantage of a poultry keeper to sell his poultry alive to per-
sons making a specialty of preparing it for market and selling it,
rather than to undertake to dress and market it himself. A poultry
keeper anywhere must dress his own poultry for a private trade or
for small, irregular orders. But wherever there is poultry enough to
run a special killing plant, such a plant, in the hands of persons who
will deal fairly with the producers, can dress poultry cheaper and
sell it better than the producers can, and make more money for
both producer and dealer. A poultry keeper outside of the area
tributary to such a plant will usually find it more profitable to dress
his own poultry, provided he prepares it properly and has it
disposed of before shipment. Otherwise he may get no more for
dressed than he would for live poultry. If the poultry arrives in
bad condition he may even get less, and besides, he has had the
trouble of dressing it. There are times, too, — mostly at Jewish
holiday seasons, — when poultry (particularly fowls) may sell for
more money alive than dressed. In general, the small producer
can dress his poultry to advantage only for private trade and when
the quality is choice, Small, odd lots and inferior birds will usually
net him more if sold alive to a home buyer than if shipped dressed
to a distant market. Selling at home, he rarely fails to get, on the
spot, all that the stock is worth, and he has no further risks in con-
nection with it. A great deal of misunderstanding in regard to
this point comes from comparisons of prices for unassorted, ordi-
nary, or inferior stock at the producing point with prices of the best
stock in a distant retail market. Such comparisons, when fairly
made, are serviceable, showing the advantage of producing good
poultry and marketing it in first-class condition. As statements of
conditions, with the inference that the producer selling his birds alive
loses the greater part of the difference between the price that he
received and the price that the consumer paid, they are misleading.
Feathers. Buyers of poultry sometimes collect feathers, but in
many places there is no local buyer. In that case the best way to
dispose of them is to get the addresses of feather buyers from
provision-trade papers and communicate with them in regard to
prices and instructions for shipping. These houses will buy feathers
of all kinds and in any quantity.
MARKETING POULTRY PRODUCTS 335
Manure. Poultry manure was long salable (at high prices) for
tanning purposes, but the use of chemicals for tanning has greatly
reduced the demand for it. In some places men still make a
business of collecting poultry manure, but at present prices it is
worth more for fertilizer, and unless methods are highly intensive,
it is more valuable to the poultry keeper for that purpose than for
any other. When manure is sold for fertilizing purposes the price
depends altogether on the buyer’s needs and on his appreciation
of its value. Poultrymen who use it on land consider it at least equal
in value to the highest-priced commercial fertilizers designed for
general use.
Cooperative selling of poultry products. As it relates to poultry,
codperation is in the experimental stage in America. In view of
the nature of the industry, the general conditions of trade, and
the difficulties in the way of any wide codperative movement, it
must be regarded as highly improbable that much will be accom-
plished in this direction except as a part of the development of
cooperation in marketing farm products of all kinds. The situa-
tion with respect to poultry, a crop which, produced everywhere,
is being harvested all the year round and yielding quite a variety
of products not easily preserved, is unlike the situation in handling
fall fruits harvested in a short season and stored for months with
slight deterioration, shrinkage, or loss. The most that can be said
of the most advanced cooperative movements in selling poultry is
that they make some progress. With this it should be said that
nearly all cooperative movements in this line everywhere have been
subsidized either by actual government grants or through the serv-
ices, as promoters, of persons compensated not by the producers but
by the government or by some organization with educational aims.
A large degree of practical cooperation is attained in some
poultry-producing communities, — notably in the South Shore soft-
roaster district, where, it should be noted, the crop is sold within
a short season. A study of conditions in such a district as this
shows plainly that a codperative selling movement will be most
stable when it develops as a part of an industry largely codper-
ative throughout. In this case there is no formal organization or
corporation. The transactions between producers and dealers are
on the same basis as in the ordinary course of trade, but the
336 POULTRY CULTURE
producers, though independent, are all engaged in ‘‘ making” the
same line of goods and in trying to make their product of uni-
formly high quality; and the middleman, dealing fairly by them,
increases his own profits, not by taking from the producer as large
a proportion of the price as possible, but by making a fair division
of profits and thus encouraging the extension of the industry and
enlarging the volume of his own trade.
Uniformity of product is the basis of codperative selling. Lack-
ing this, no codperative movement can be self-sustaining. With
uniformity of product and a sufficient volume of it, there comes a
strong tendency toward practical cooperation in selling, which gives
the producer all the advantages that he would gain by a purely
cooperative system of disposing of products. Given conditions
favorable to such cooperation, the form of the selling system is
of less importance than the spirit of the parties interested. The
case mentioned was selected as most strikingly typical. Something
of the same conditions may be found wherever a particular branch
of poultry culture is followed by many persons in a community.
CHAPTER XX
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE AND VICE
Hygiene and sanitation. Hygiene and sanitation are closely
related topics, practically inseparable in a treatise of this kind.
Hygiene relates more particularly to health and the preservation of
health in creatures ; sanitation relates more particularly to the main-
tenance of healthful conditions of environment. As the principal
phases of these topics in their relation to poultry have been dis-
cussed incidentally in preceding chapters, we need here introduce
only a brief discussion of the common ills and faults of poultry.
The general observance of rules of hygiene and sanitation is of
vastly greater importance, both to the poultry keeper individually
and in its effect on general conditions in poultry culture, than spe-
cific knowledge of the causes, symptoms, and treatments of dis-
eases, for attention to hygienic and sanitary conditions is a general
preventive and salutary measure by which we not only ward off
disease but remedy most of the diseases which may be profitably
treated, and keep stock in the most profitable physical condition.
Correct hygiene and sanitation are a part of good practice in poultry
keeping. Special consideration and treatment of diseases become
necessary only when conditions are wrong or when practice is at
fault. Individual treatment is usually not profitable because of the
small value of the birds. In general, a knowledge of poultry diseases
is directly useful to poultrymen only for the determination and
correction of wrong conditions of hygiene and sanitation.
Indications of disease or of a low physical condition are, to
those who can apprehend them, unmistakable signs of weakness
in the stock, or improper conditions or errors in handling. Gen-
eral symptoms show that there is something wrong. Just what is
wrong is not likely to be evident from symptoms except in cases
where a symptom is peculiar to a disease or to a small group of
similar disorders. When no special symptoms can be detected, the
disease can rarely be positively identified, and we have to turn
337
338 POULTRY CULTURE
from the observation of symptoms to the investigation of condi-
tions, examine systematically into matters of hygiene and sanita-
tion, mark every wrong condition as a possible cause of trouble,
and correct that condition, whether the trouble can be directly
connected with it or not.
Causes of disease. The causes of disease are (1) constitutional
(arising from defects of the organism); (2) detetic (caused by
improper food and feeding) ; (3) exvzronmental (due to improper
surroundings) ; (4) contagious (communicated by contact). It is not
necessary to discuss these exhaustively. Only a few of the more
important of each class need be mentioned. Causes of disease are
not always clearly referable to one of these classes. A single cause
acting independently rarely produces disease, but it may open the
way for the operation of other causes. In such a case it may not
be clear which is the primary cause, but that point is immaterial.
Constitutional causes of disease. Defects of the organism are
of two kinds: congenztal (or inherited) and functional (or spon-
taneous). A creature may have a constitution generally weak or
defective in some respect because one or more of its ancestors
had. As a rule, it will not have a sound constitution unless its
immediate parents have sound constitutions. No matter how good
the constitution may have been originally, it may be impaired, either
at some point or as a whole, by accident, or by overworking an
organ, or through any external disease-producing cause, and never
regain its full tone though the conditions which caused the trouble
are removed and a decided improvement follows. In such cases
the functional weakness continues as a latent condition favorable
to the operation of the causes of disease. The most prevalent
constitutional cause of disease is debility, or low vitality, increasing
from generation to generation in stocks kept under highly arti-
ficial conditions.
Dietetic causes of disease. Poor quality of food, ill-balanced
rations, overfeeding, underfeeding, and irregular feeding are the
principal dietetic causes of disease. As was shown in discussing
the relations of methods of feeding to other factors in the manage-
ment of poultry, the same ration may be, under some conditions,
good, under others, bad; suitable for one bird, not suitable for an-
other ; useful for a special purpose or up to a certain point, as in
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE 339
fattening, but dangerous if too long continued. Poisons also are in
this class of causes of diseases.
Enviromental causes of disease. Errors in locating poultry houses
and yards, faults in construction and regulation of poultry houses,
unsanitary conditions in houses and yards, errors in incubation and
brooding, disturbances affecting comfort and regularity of life (such
as rough treatment by attendants and fright by passing persons or
animals), are the common environmental causes of disease in poultry.
Contagious diseases. Epidemics, as a rule, make little trouble
among healthy flocks kept under good sanitary conditions. Some
of the most virulent (as cholera, fowl typhoid, and bacterial enter-
itis) sometimes seem to be equally dangerous to all kinds of stock
under all conditions, but in view of the general absence of con-
tagious diseases from plants where conditions are good, and of
the efficacy of proper attention to hygiene and sanitation in stamp-
ing out contagion, it may well be doubted whether even the germs
of such contagious diseases are dangerous to poultry that are sound
in constitution and living in proper surroundings. When epidemics
of roup and enteritis break out, they are usually attributed to con-
tagion, but contagion seems to be effective only when other causes
prepare the way for it. Scaly leg and various skin diseases are
plainly transmitted in some cases, yet in nearly all affected flocks
some individuals are immune.
Symptoms of disease.. Indications of disease are general (com-
mon to many diseases) and sfecza/ (peculiar to certain diseases).
General symptoms of disease are of much more importance to
the poultry keeper than are special symptoms, except in cases where
the special symptom appears at first or at any early stage and is
plainly marked, —as in skin diseases and in some throat and lung
troubles. General symptoms are negative rather than positive, in-
dicating lack of health, or of perfect health, rather than the pres-
ence of any specific disease. As control of disease depends largely
upon detecting it in the first stages and promptly using corrective
measures, it is of much more importance that the poultry keeper
should have a keen appreciation of the signs of health, and be
quick to observe any failing in them, than that he should know
the pronounced symptoms of diseases, for in a large proportion of
cases a disease cannot be identified by symptoms until it is so far
340 POULTRY CULTURE
advanced that treatment is useless or unprofitable. The general
symptoms most readily marked are weakness and inactivity, a
drooping attitude, and a dull color and dull expression of the head.
Diarrhea is present in many cases.
Special symptoms plain to ordinary observation are head and
foot symptoms, and irregularities in the actions and in the dis-
charges of the birds. When proper allowance is made for paleness
associated with inactivity of the organs of reproduction, the color of
the comb is a fairly reliable index of health. A yellowish comb indi-
cates biliousness ; a pale comb is the sign of an anemic condition,
and suggests examination for symptoms of enteritis or tuberculosis,
or for lice ; a dark comb indicates a plethoric condition, defective cir-
culation, and sometimes congestion, as in bronchitis or pneumonia.
Yellow warts on the face and comb occur in chicken pox. Yellow-
ish-white, cheesy lumps about the eyes, nostrils, and corners of the
mouth are more likely to indicate roupy catarrh. A watery dis-
charge from the nostrils may be nothing more serious than a com-
mon cold. Neglected, such a cold may develop into roup, with
thicker discharge and perhaps accumulations of cheesy matter.
White or grayish patches inside the mouth, especially when the
odor is very offensive, indicate diphtheritic roup. Head symptoms
are particularly important, because so many of them have more than
local significance. Foot symptoms are direct symptoms of local
trouble, such as scaly leg, corns, and bumblefoot. To the lay ob-
server vent discharges are very unreliable symptoms, hardly to be
classed as special symptoms for him, though to a veterinary they
may be very useful.
General treatment of disease. The practical and profitable way
for a poultry keeper to treat disease in his flocks is by general
salutary measures; birds too far gone to respond to these are
rarely worth saving. Such local troubles as scaly leg, injuries like
frostbite, and combs damaged in fighting, may be given attention
in the case of individual birds that are particularly valuable, but for
the great majority of such cases the best thing to do is to remove
the cause — or the bird from the cause — and let nature work re-
covery. It is possible to cure a large proportion even of very serious
cases of sickness in poultry by giving good mzrsing with suitable
medicinal treatment, — the nursing being the more important ; but
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DISEASE 341
it usually costs more than the birds are worth, besides monopolizing
time and attention that should be given (then, more than at any
other time) to careful consideration of general conditions in the flock,
and to the adoption of salutary measures applying to the whole
flock. An occasional case of disease has no general significance,
but anything resembling an epidemic shows that some of the gen-
eral causes of disease are operative. Disease on such a scale is the
penalty for mistakes, and especially for neglect to keep up the con-
stitutional vitality of the stock and to maintain right hygienic and
sanitary conditions. No amount of doctoring, however effective at
the time, will give permanent relief. The only advantage that a
poultryman has in knowing diseases is that he knows the causes,
and is thus able to follow the old medical maxim, ‘‘ Remove the
cause and the effects will cease.”’ It is a matter of common remark
among poultrymen that the more one doctors, the more he will
have to doctor.
Injuries. Accidents cannot be wholly avoided, but damage from
such causes is insignificant. Injuries due to environmental causes
must be prevented by dealing with those causes as with causes of
disease. One of the most important of these is crooked breastbone
in fowls. Thousands of cases of this are developed by allowing
young chicks to roost (by day, usually) on narrow-edged boards,
on the edges of boxes and barrels, and in like places. This is not
the sole cause of crooked breasts, but is a common cause which is
easily avoided. Another very common injury is frostbite of combs
and wattles. This is best avoided by keeping fowls that are adapted
to the climate, but much can be done in the way of prevention by
accustoming the birds to low temperature, by giving dry feed only
in zero weather, and by giving snow or finely cracked ice instead
of water when it is so cold that water freezes quickly. Warm
water should not be given.
Internal parasites. Worms are the most troublesome internal
parasites of poultry. The gapeworm infests the windpipe. It is
dangerous only to young chickens. Zapeworms and roundworms
of many varieties infest all kinds of poultry, being found mostly
in the intestines and digestive organs. When present in small
numbers they do little damage to strong, robust birds, and do not
often multiply dangerously when sanitary conditions are good.
342 POULTRY CULTURE
When a stock of poultry becomes badly infested with worms, the
numbers of the parasites which may simultaneously attack a strong
bird may be so great that its strength is of little advantage. In
such cases it is advisable to kill off all stock and keep no poultry
on the land for several years. Stock from a badly infected flock,
if taken to new land, carries the worms with it.
External parasites. Lice are often referred to as enemies against
which the poultry keeper must wage unremitting warfare. This
view exaggerates the importance of direct personal efforts to keep
these parasites in subjection. There are two general classes of lice,
— those which live upon the birds and those which only feed upon
them, remaining at other times in crevices about the roosts and
nests. Neither kind does perceptible damage when present in
small numbers, or multiplies too rapidly on adult birds when sani-
tary conditions are good, when the birds are vigorous, and when
ample opportunity is given them to ‘‘ dust’ themselves. Some live
on dead skin and feather particles. Very few birds are absolutely
free from lice, even when treated regularly with insecticides.
The presence of lice in small numbers on the bodies of poultry
is by some authorities considered beneficial. They rarely become
seriously detrimental to any strong stock kept under favorable con-
ditions. Treatment for them should be necessary only on incubat-
ing poultry, on young birds when very small, and on old ones when
confined without opportunity to free themselves from lice. Con-
tinued necessity for fighting lice shows plainly that some other con-
dition needs attention. It may be the vitality of the stock; it may
be the sanitary conditions ; it may be that, once allowed to establish
themselves, the lice, though constantly fought, have never been
effectively treated (this is the case especially with red mites, which
secrete themselves about the roosts). For lice on poultry, dry insec-
ticides (powdered) are used; for lice about roosts, nests, and
buildings, liquid insecticides are applied freely to infested places.
Vices. The bad habits of poultry are developed almost wholly in
close confinement under unsatisfactory conditions. Feather eating,
egg eating, and various forms of cannibalism common among
closely confined poultry are rarely seen among poultry at liberty
amid favorable surroundings, and give comparatively little trouble
among closely confined birds if the conditions are sanitary and the
PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF VICE 343
birds have something to occupy their attention. Feeding in littered
floors, supplying dry ground grains in hoppers, and giving cabbages,
mangels, and dried meat and fish, all help to prevent vices by giving
the birds something to do and to think about. Vices once started
spread rapidly. The only effective way to suppress them is by im-
proving the conditions. Sometimes a change of quarters and the
removal of the worst offenders will stop a bad habit not too firmly
established. The reliable cure is right conditions and (if necessary)
special attention to keeping the birds busy until they forget the
objectionable practice.
PART III. REPRODUCTION
CHAPTER XXI
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Original type of the domestic fowl. The only known wild
birds of the same species as the domestic fowl are the little jungle
fowls of India and Ceylon. One of these, the Gallus Bankiva, is
by many considered the ancestor of all the numerous and diverse
races of fowls. This view rests more on argument than on evi-
dence, and the argument is far from conclusive. The strongest
points in its favor are that the jungle fowls are the only known
wild birds of the species, and that the Gallus Bankiva closely
resembles the domestic Black-Red Game Bantam. There is very
little accurate knowledge of the jungle fowls. Considering the
difficulty of getting full information in regard to matters more
recent than the first domestication of fowls and more ascertainable
than the facts as to the modern jungle fowls, the conclusions of
naturalists and the rather casual observations of fanciers and others
on this point, together with the few far from satisfactory experi-
ments made in India with jungle and domestic fowls and their
crosses, carry little weight with the careful student of pgultry cul-
ture. On either economic or evolutionary grounds it is much more
reasonable to assume that the domestic and the jungle fowls are
descended from a common ancestor, probably intermediate in size
between jungle fowls and ordinary unimproved domestic stock.
Unlike the wild ancestors of the duck, goose, and turkey, the little
jungle fowl is not economically attractive to man and does not
readily adapt itself to domestication or quickly improve in economic
qualities under domestic conditions. It seems to be an established
fact that, in the countries that they inhabit, the male jungle fowls
in freedom breed readily with domestic hens wandering from the vil-
lages. The female jungle fowl is naturally less bold in approaching
344
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 345
human habitations, and even should connections with domestic cocks
occur, the results would not be so readily observed. In captivity
jungle fowls of both sexes are shy breeders, the females especially
so; but to a poultry breeder familiar with many instances of the
effects of changes in location, diet, and habits of life on fertility
conclusions on this point drawn from wild birds in captivity and
from their immediate descendants have little significance.
Economically the presumption is that with fowls, as with other
poultry, the wild type as first brought into domestication was in
itself desirable, and that some, perhaps the greater number, of the
wild stock were of docile disposition. The desirability of such
individuals would quickly lead to their domestication or extermina-
tion. The smallest and wildest specimens of the race would escape
capture, or perhaps return to wild life to avoid man more carefully
than before. Because of their lack of economic value he would
refrain from pursuing these, but the larger or more venturesome
would be constantly exposed to his attacks. The inevitable results
of such conditions in a favorable environment would be the de-
velopment of a race of fowls less valuable and less adapted to
domestication than the original type.
Considering the case from the economic point of view, there is
little reason to suppose that primitive man domesticated such a
fowl as the jungle fowl of to-day. The antiquity and wide distribu-
tion of game types have led some to infer that fowls were first
domesticated for the amusement rather than for the use of man,
but the domestication of fowls evidently occurred centuries earlier
than the earliest authentic records of game fowls. Combining the
economic and evolutionist points of view, the theory that the
domestic fowls of all varieties, and the jungle fowls as well, are
descended from a common ancestor becomes much more plausi-
ble than the commonly accepted theory. On this theory, and con-
sidering what is known or may be reasonably inferred in regard
to the differentiation of types in domestication, the original type
may be constructed with sufficient accuracy to afford an initial type
from which all the others have been developed. Such a type must
be assumed at the outset, and the value of the assumption demon-
strated incidentally in the course of the presentation of the his-
tories and descriptions of popular types. Hence it is assumed that
346 POULTRY CULTURE
the original type of domestic fowl was a bird of about the size
of the partridge or the pheasant, in shape, approaching the game
type yet not presenting that type as developed with pit qualities ;
in color, of the black-red or brown-red type ; with small single comb
and no superfluous plumage.
Birds of this type are often seen in mongrel flocks showing no
marked traces of the principal improved types. The general shape
and size of small mongrels is probably much the same as that of
the original stock, though color is more various. Even such breeds
as the Leghorns, Hamburgs, and Polish closely resemble this
original, except in color and superficial features.
Types of domestic fowls. The number of varieties of fowls is
so great, and the development of characters so irregular, that it
is not possible to make a simple classification in which the place
of each variety is readily assigned. A simple classification requires
that the grouping of classes be according to economic characters,
which are few in number and relatively stable, rather than accord-
ing to superficial characters, which are many and constantly
changing. Scientific classification must be consistent. A primary
classification on a geographical? basis is obviously absurd, leading
to all sorts of inconsistencies, but regular differences in type in
different countries may properly be indicated in secondary divi-
sions. With further subdivision based on superficial characters,
a classification fundamentally simple and consistent will include
nearly all well-defined types.
This plan of classification gives five distinct general types of
fowls, to which may be referred all but two varieties with plumage
of abnormal structure, for which a sixth class is made. The basis
of the classification being economic, the common economic terms
1 The classification adopted by the American Poultry Association for the
Standard of Perfection is geographic (breeds being classified according to the
country in which they originated or from which they were introduced) and
patriotic (American breeds being given first), but utterly unscientific and tending
to confuse, not to clarify, conceptions of type. In such classification, homogeneity
is wholly dependent upon chance. In some cases (as in the American class)
the class is homogeneous because, on the principle adopted, incomplete; in
others (as the English class) there is no homogeneity. The absurdity of such
classification becomes plain when representatives of all breeds and varieties
are arranged according to it. This system of arrangement is rarely used a second
time at a poultry show.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
apolis, Indiana)
VY Ym
oo es
Fic. 329. Aseel Game cock. (Photo-
graph from Dr. H. P. Clarke, Indian-
347
descriptive of classes of fowls are
used for the classes to which they
apply. We have, then, the follow-
ing general types of fowls : (1) game
types, (2) laying types, (3) meat
types, (4) general-purpose types,
(5) deformed types, (6) bantams.
Game types. While, as has been
said, it is not probable that fowls
were domesticated for the sport of
fighting the cocks, it is certain that
in domestication the pugnacity and
gameness of the cock led to the
early development of a fighting
type, possessed of great courage,
strength, and endurance, of very
compact form, close-feathered or
short-feathered, with no superfluous
appendages. Ancient records of
various kinds — hieroglyphics, coins, vases — show the wide dis-
tribution of this type.
cockfighting seems to
have been everywhere
a popular pastime. In
modern times it has been
outlawed among civi-
lized and humane peo-
ples. Though not yet
wholly suppressed, even
in England and Amer-
ica, public sentiment is
so strongly against it,
the risks of detection are
so great, and the pen-
alties are so impartially
applied, that even the
advocates of the sport
recognize that it must
From early times to within a century,
FIG. 330.
Old English Game cock.
graph from owner, W. F. Liedtke, Meriden,
Connecticut)
(Photo-
Me
Fic. 331. Cornish Indian Game hen.
Forest City Cornish yards, Shawnee,
Oklahoma
348 POULTRY CULTURE
soon cease absolutely. Whatever
may be said of the humanity and
morality of cockfighting, there is no
doubt that indirectly the results of
breeding for the pit were beneficial
to poultry culture, the requirements
of the cockpit compelling an atten-
tion to strength and vitality too often
neglected when qualities not imme-
diately dependent upon them are
sought. As would be expected from
the attention given to breeding fight-
ing fowls, some most pronounced
utility types are plainly derived
through modifications of this type.
After the prohibition of cockfight-
ing some breeders developed an
exaggerated game type for exhibi-
tion. The fighting types as devel-
oped in different countries vary
considerably. Only the two most im-
portant, the Aseel and the English
Game, need be considered here.
These, with the Malay, the Cornish
Indian Game, and the modern Ex-
hibition Game constitute the game
types of interest to the student of
poultry culture.
The Ascel (or Azeel), “the true
fighting Game of India,” is a small
bird very strong in frame and so
short of feather that the plumage
does not conceal the lines of the form
as in birds with longer plumage. It
combines, more than any other fowl,
great muscular development with
strong bone. Aseels are of various
colors and have pea combs.
Fic. 332. Front view of Cornish
Indian Game cockerel. Forest City
Cornish yards
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS — 349
The English Game, by some now called Thoroughbred Game,
is the type of fighting game familiar nearly everywhere among
English-speaking peoples. It is a larger bird than the Aseel (the
males sometimes weighing 6 and 7 pounds), has longer plumage,
and abundant tail and hackle in the male, and is a more symmetri-
cal bird, more alert, and generally more attractive. This race is of
many colors, black-reds! and brown-reds being most abundant.
Some stocks have been bred to a fixed color pattern, others have
jL fee tee
Fic. 333. Three-quarters rear view of Fic.334. Three-quarters front view of
bird in Fig. 332 bird in Fig. 332?
not. The comb is small and single. But for the pugnacity of the
males, which develops at a surprisingly early age, they make very
good fowls for either a farm or family flock,— not as good as
special utility breeds but much better than ordinary mongrel stock.
The hens are good layers and especially good sitters and mothers,
being noted for the courage with which they defend their young.
As table fowls they are meaty but rather close-grained and hard.
1 Short for “ black-breasted red,” a description applied to the cock of this
color type, though as a matter of fact the typically colored male is all black ex-
cept the neck and back, which are red, and would be more correctly described as
“ red-backed black.” 2 Photographs for Figs. 331-334 from owner.
350 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 335. White Cornish Indian Game cock. (Photo-
graph from owner, Frank Brown, Marblehead, Mass.)
The Cornish In-
dian Game} was
produced in England
about 1830 to 1840,
by crossing the Aseel
onthe English Game,
and (it is supposed)
was improved many
years later by the in-
troduction of Malay
blood. Inappearance
a giant Aseel, it has
little of the fighting
quality of that breed.
The American Stand-
ard weights are cock,
9 pounds; hen, 64
pounds; cockerel, 74
pounds ; pullet, 5$ pounds. These weights are very commonly
exceeded, cocks weighing as
high as 11 and 12 pounds.
Though of pronounced game
type these birds are usually
classed as a meat or table breed.
The meat is very abundant,
especially on breast and legs.
They are reputed rather poor
layers of small, light-brown
eggs. There are three color
varieties, dark, white, and rea-
laced. The dark variety are of
1 T have retained this name as most
appropriate — most suggestive of the
relation of this to other types. In F1G.336. White Cornish Indian Game hen
England the breed is known simply (Photograph from owner, Frank Brown)
as the Indian Game. In America it
went by that name first but later was called Cornish Indian Game; recently some
breeders, hoping to increase the popularity of the breed by eliminating the term
“game” from its name, have taken to calling it simply Cornish.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Fic. 337. Red-Laced Cornish Indian Game cock. (Pho-
tograph from owner, W. H. Card, Bristol, Connecticut)
351
the black-red color
type, the males
black and red in
hackle, back, and
saddle, and the fe-
males a mahogany
bay penciled with
black. The white
variety have all-
white plumage.
Thered-laced have
plumage of white
ground, edged with
dark buff or red.
The Indian Game
is a mixture of
game types from
Asia and Europe.
The white and the red-laced varieties were made in America.
The Malay Game is entirely of Asiatic origin. Whether the
type was developed directly by selection from other Asiatic games,
or by mixture with Asiatic
types other than game, is not
known. It is taller and less
compactly built than the Indian
Game, suggesting alliance with
Cochins and Brahmas of the
type first brought to America.
American Standard weights are
cock, 9 pounds; cockerel, 7
pounds ; hen, 7 pounds ; pullet,
5 pounds. The full-grown male
of standard weight should be
26 inches high; the female,
18 inches. Malays are rarely
seen in this country. Their
principal interest to the stu-
dent is in the suggestion of
Fic. 338. Red-Laced Cornish Indian
Game hen. (Photograph from owner,
W. H. Card)
352
t
/
Ras
Fic. 339. Red-Laced Cornish Indian
Game cockerel. (Photograph from
owner, W. IH. Card)
Laying types.
term “egg type”’
In Chapter V the
was defined, and
POULTRY CULTURE
connection between the game
type and the Brahma and Co-
chin types. In America they
are of the black-red pattern.
The modern Exhibition
Game was developed from the
English type of pit game, with
probably some infusion of Malay
blood. The prominent charac-
teristic of this type is the ex-
aggerated length of neck and
legs. The standard colors are
black-red, brown-red, golden
duckwing, silver duckwing,
birchen, red pile, white, and
black. In common with most
other types which have some
feature greatly exaggerated,
they are at present somewhat
out of favor with poultrymen.
the Mediterranean, Dutch, and Polish
groups were mentioned as illustrations
of that type. These breeds are all of
the same general conformation and,
with a few exceptions, about the same
in size. The differences between them
are differences in color of plumage
and skin, and in development of head
appurtenances. Consideration of this
type as a whole shows that geographi-
cally it is a European type, — of all
Europe rather than of any part of it,
though superficial characters (as would
be expected) have been developed dif-
ferently by different peoples, and (as
will be shown) modifications in the
Fic. 340. Exhibition Game hen
owned by W. H. Mudge, Wes-
terly, Rhode Island
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 353
direction of a meat type were made in some cases. Of these
breeds and their varieties, a brown Leghorn with small single
comb comes nearest (and very near) the assumed initial type,
and also resembles the black-breasted red game fowl. On this
account, and because, also, of the extent to which indications of
Leghorn blood now appear in ordinary stock in almost all parts
of Europe, some suppose that the Italian, or Leghorn, is the
foundation stock of all European races. This is not impossible.
It is even highly probable that the Romans introduced their fowls
wherever they went in the period of their conquests, and that these
introductions sometimes influenced the native stock. But certain
general differences in the laying type as it was developed along
the Mediterranean, and as developed along a more northerly route
westward, are significant, suggesting differences in ideals going
much farther back than the Roman conquests. These differences
will appear from the descriptions of the European breeds of the
laying type. Before describing these, something should be said of
their ancestry.
The early laying type. The common native stock in all parts
of the world except southeastern Asia seems to have been, from
earliest times, of the initial type described, having this type slightly
modified, sometimes for the better, by the influence of the game
type, or by careful selection for egg or meat qualities, or by good
care, and sometimes for the worse by indifferent breeding and
neglect, but almost invariably lacking in distinctive characteristics.
Of this character, according to accounts, are most of the fowls
throughout western Asia, northern Africa, and southeastern Europe
to-day, and there is no evidence that they have ever been different.
Laying breeds. Along the Mediterranean Sea the fowls present
a general uniformity of type not so noticeable elsewhere on the
continent of Europe. The type is not only uniform but is more
simple than the other European types to be considered, the more
elaborate modifications of superficial characters in some of the
Mediterranean breeds familiar to modern poultry keepers having
been developed in breeds of Mediterranean derivation in north-
western Europe. As developed in Italy and Spain the so-called
Mediterranean fowls were, and still are, very like what would
naturally be developed from an initial type (such as has been
354 POULTRY CULTURE
assumed), under the climatic conditions found there, by people
paying little attention to either meat qualities, fighting qualities,
or color markings. The most striking peculiarity of these fowls
was a large, fleshy single comb, not always present in all individuals
of any of the breeds, but often highly developed in specimens of
them all.
From Turkey westward through southern Russia, Germany,
Holland, Belgium, and France, fowls of the same general body
type and simple furnishings were common, but among them there
appeared, in large numbers in some localities, and in occasional
flocks almost everywhere, two other conspicuous types, — a rose-
combed type and a crested type, in both of which were developed
more elaborate color patterns than were found among the fowls
along the Mediterranean. The sharp differentiation of color pat-
terns and the high development of other features are the work of
the modern fancier, but though we have little accurate knowledge
of the earlier history of the breeds which he took in their crude
form and developed, what we have indicates that the separation of
types began very early in the westward movement of the human
race, and that interest in the manipulation of form and color in
poultry must have been from earliest times, as to-day, more in-
tense in the Teutonic than in other branches of the race. Breeds
of this type were early developed in France and England, modified
especially for meat production but still unmistakably like the com-
mon type. In almost every country of Europe there are breeds
of this same body type but unlike in such characters as comb,
crest, color, etc. Most of these are hardly known outside of the
countries or districts where they are found, and there is little au-
thentic information about their origin and history. In discussing
the laying breeds the familiar ones will be considered first, quite
fully and in the order of their apparent relation to the primitive
type. The unfamiliar ones will be treated very briefly, to show the
extent and variety of the class.
The Mediterranean division of the laying type. The Mediter-
ranean group has now two principal subdivisions, the Italian and
the Spanish. Just how far characteristic differences between Italian
and Spanish types are due to selection and modification in modern
times is uncertain, but it seems probable that differences in color
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 355
of plumage, skin, and feet are race characteristics. As found to-
day in their native countries the fowls of Spain are, on the whole,
larger than those of Italy. The most significant general difference
between them is the color of skin and legs, the Italian fowls having
a yellow skin and leg (the Black Leghorn, yellow and black), while
the Spanish have white or gray skin with flesh-colored or slate-
colored legs. In Spain there seems to have been, for a long time,
a decided preference for black plumage, and that is said to prepon-
derate in the native breeds there to-day. In Italy little attention
seems to have been given to differentiating color types. Most of
the modern varieties of Leghorns have been produced in America
and England from Italian foundation stock.
Leghorns, as Italian fowls are called} in this country and among
English-speaking peoples generally, are said to have been first
introduced into America in 1835. Those first brought here attracted
little attention. In 1853 another importation was made, and de-
veloped some interest in the type. Subsequently a few more lots
were brought from Italy, but, so far as known, importations were
not numerous, nor was the total number of birds imported large.
In the early importations were brown, white, buff, and black
specimens, and possibly other colors, but only the brown, white,
and black varieties were developed from stock brought in at this
period. As introduced from Italy the Leghorns had generally, if
not exclusively, single combs, and that type of comb has, from the
time of their introduction, been far more popular than the rose
comb developed (as is generally supposed) by infusions of Ham-
burg blood. The ear lobes in the first imported stock were red
or partly red.
In size the ordinary Leghorn is small. No standards of weight
have been established. Average specimens weigh, at maturity,
males, from 4 to 44 pounds ; females, about 3 pounds. The largest
individuals in average flocks exceed these weights, and when bred
for size the average is easily increased from 1 to 24 pounds.
Occasional specimens weigh more, sometimes equaling in size the
average of the middle-weight breeds.
The American Standard type of Leghorn is a finely modeled,
graceful, sprightly fowl, with the characteristic large comb, wattles,
1 Because introduced from the port of Leghorn.
356 POULTRY CULTURE
and ear lobes of the Medi-
terranean class, and of size
and form appropriate to the
style of the bird. The ear
lobes are white or creamy
white in color. While the
body plumage is not as
short as that of game fowls,
the race is close feathered,
with large wings and tails.
The shanks and feet are
smooth, the number of toes
normal,— four on each foot.
The English type of
Fic. 341. Single-Comb Brown Leghorn
cockerel, Grove Hill poultry yards,
Waltham, Massachusetts
Leghorn is larger than the
American, and meatier, ap-
proaching the Dorking type,
while large Leghorns on
the lines of the American type are more like Minorcas in shape.
The varieties of Leghorns take their names from the colors of
their plumage, the subvarieties from the form of the comb.
Brown Leghorns (single-
comb and rose-comb) have the
black-red color pattern. The
early Brown Leghorns were
quite light in color, and were
sometimes called red! The
American Standard exhibition
male has the red very rich in
tone, with hackle and saddle
feathers cleanly striped with
black. Females of like breed-
ing, the natural color mates
of such males, are very dark
brown, their darkest shades
often black or nearly so, and
= —— ws sl
Fic. 342. Single-Comb Brown Leg-
horn pullet, Grove Hill poultry
yards, Waltham, Massachusetts
1 As recently as the early nineties I have heard the name “ Red Leghorn”
applied to ordinary Brown Leghorns.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 357
not to be compared in beauty of color with the exhibition female.
The Standard female has a ground color of light brown, with
black tail, dark-brown flight feathers, a fine stippling of dark brown
on the back and wings, the breast salmon and the hackle orange
yellow with black stripe. The male of the same breeding is very
much lighter in color than the exhibition male, —a lighter red,
usually with less striping in the hackle and saddle, and the black of
the breast and body more or
less mottled or bronzed with
red. In reality the Brown
Leghorn has two color vari-
eties, dark and light. The
Standard describes the male
of the dark and the female of
the light variety, and these
are shown together in the exhi-
bition pen. They are chosen,
not as matching in color,
like the exhibition Barred
Plymouth Rocks, but as show-
ing the finest color develop-
ments in the different sexes.
Brown Leghorns are some-
times bred to secure standard Fic. 343. Rose-Comb Brown Leghorn
7 cockerel. (Photograph from owner,
specimens of both sexesfrom —w. w, Kulp, Pottstown, Pennsylvania)
the same mating, and when
so bred, in time give a third intermediate color variety, specimens
of which often closely approximate Standard requirements, though
in general they have little chance of winning in competition with
birds of the other lines.
buff Leghorns (single-comb and rose-comb). That among early
importations of Leghorns there were more of the yellow, or buff,
than of the brown-red shade seems certain, though little interest
was taken in them at that time. Buff Leghorns were shown under
that name in America in 1867, more than twenty years before the
modern Buff Leghorn began to be developed in England, but they
made so little impression that the variety soon disappeared, and
even the fact of their existence was forgotten until records of their
358 POULTRY CULTURE
exhibition were found a
few years since. About
1888 the modern Buff
Leghorn was introduced
into England from Den-
mark, with the color in
very crude condition. The
Danish stock undoubtedly
came originally from Italy,
where buff or yellow birds
are often seen, but of its
history in Denmark little
is known. It is said} that
in England the Buff Co-
Fic. 344. Single-Comb Buff Leghorn cock chin was at once effec-
(Photograph from owner, H. M. Lamon, tively used to improve
Washington, D. C.)
brought to America were, with few
the uniform shade of golden buff
required by the Standard. Both
white and black were prevalent
in wings and tail, and the males
1 Though the authority for this is good
and in accord with common opinion, my
own experience with Buff Leghorns leads
me to doubt whether, if Cochins were used,
their influence extended to all the stock or
was as great as was supposed. The first
importations from Denmark to England
were made in 1888. The cross with the
Cochin was made in that year or in the
following year. The first importation to
America was made in 1890. In 1893 I
bought eggs of this strain, and bred it until
1899. In the seasons of 1894, 1895, and
1896 I reared, in all, about 1500 birds of
the color. The first birds
exceptions, far from being of
Fic. 345. Rose-Comb buff Leghorn
hen. (Photograph from owner, H. J.
Fisk, Falconer, New York)
this variety, and. in that number no specimen appeared which at all suggested
Cochin ancestry. The birds were unmistakably Leghorns, the variations in shape
often suggesting an admixture of Game blood and sometimes of blood of the
Sussex type, while the colors suggested combinations of White, Brown, and Pile
Leghorns, and Red Sussex. It is hardly credible that undesirable Cochin char-
acteristics could be so completely eliminated in so short a time.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
(Photograph by E. J. Hall)
Fic. 346. Single-Comb White Leghorn cock
399
generally had reddish
hackles, backs, and
saddles. Though re-
ports of exhibitions
every year described
males quite perfect in
color, it was about
1900 before males of
a uniform shade of
buff were produced.
The rose-combed va-
riety was developed in
America, apparently
by crossing with the
Rose-Combed White
Leghorn.
White Leghorns
(single-comb and rose-
comb). The single-
combed variety was
developed in this country contemporaneously with the brown and
black varieties, attracting less attention than the brown at first, but
later becoming more popular
with specialists in egg produc-
tion. The color of the plumage
is white throughout, — naturally
a creamy white, the dazzling
white seen in the exhibition
room being secured (except in
rare cases) only by washing or
bleaching the feathers. In its
relation to other varieties the
White Leghorn represented the
last stage in the reduction of
the color of the black-red fowl
of the initial type, the sev-
eral intermediate stages being
brown, red, buff, white.
z.
Fic. 347. Single-Comb White Leghorn
hen. (Photograph from owner, Harmon
Bradshaw, Lebanon, Indiana)
360 POULTRY CULTURE
Black Leghorns (single-comb)
have been bred in this country
continuously since the early im-
portations, but never extensively.
In the dark subvariety of the
Brown Leghorn and the Black
Leghorn we have the stages of
the intensification of color from
the original type.
Mottled Leghorns (single-comb),
the Anconas, are given in the
American Standard exactly the
same description for shape as Leg-
Fic. 348. Single-Comb Black Leg- horns. They have distinctive color
horn pullet, Turtle Point farm, characteristics only. The plumage
Saratoga, New York. (Photograph
from owner)
is black with each feather tipped
with white, giving an even mottling
of white on a black ground. According to most authentic accounts
the variety came to England from Italy, and thence to America.
Note. The five foregoing are the Italian varieties, in which there is general
interest in America and which are commonly seen in our shows. Other varieties
of this class are seen only occasionally and in small numbers. Some observations
on the relative values of these varieties,
and on certain differences between them,
are therefore better presented here than
at the end of the list. In everything but
color the Leghorns as they came from
Italy were the same. In the American
Standard the descriptions for shape are
the same for all. Theoretically, the vari-
eties are identical except in color, but the
differentiation of a breed into varieties
inevitably tends to further differentiation
as the result of individual differences. In
addition, introductions of foreign blood
usually bring in different elements, and
though the purpose of these is to
strengthen a variety or breed character- | —
istic, and foreign characters are syste- Fic.349. Ancona hen. (Photograph
matically bred out by fanciers, the use of from United States Department of
the fancier’s culls, and indifferent selection Agriculture)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 361
by less careful breeders, tends to give the variety as a whole more of the for-
eign qualities than was intended, and to create between varieties differences
not in accord with the standards. Of the single-combed varieties, Brown Leg-
horns have had at various times infusions of blood of the Black-Red Pit Game;
White Leghorns, infusions of the blood of the White Minorca; Buff Leghorns,
as related, are a recent mixture; the Ancona has had infusions of Minorca
blood. That the rose-combed varieties are originally indebted to the Ham-
burgs for their combs there is little doubt. As a result of these different in-
fusions of blood, rose-combed varieties generally show a little more of the
plumpness of the Hamburg and something of its delicacy. Single-Comb
Brown Leghorns are more rugged than others, except, perhaps, the blacks.
White Leghorns are generally a little larger than the other varieties.1_ White
Leghorns and Anconas lay larger eggs than the others. Buff Leghorns were
at first very rugged and laid a slightly tinted egg. After their first boom the
breeding of this variety was left largely in the hands of a few fanciers. Though
these made rapid improvement in color, something was lost in other directions.
Pile Leghorns (single-comb) have a white-red color. pattern, the
black in the initial type being replaced by white and the red much
reduced in strength. The true place of such a combination in a
color series is not readily determined. Whether such a combina-
tion could be produced directly by elimination of color is not
known. The variety was made by combination, —by mating a
black-red with a white bird. It is bred only as a novelty.
Duckwing Leghorns (single-comb) are of recent English ori-
gin, and are said to have been produced like Pile Leghorns, by
crossing Brown and White Leghorns. This is the tolerably well-
authenticated statement regarding the stock of the most promi-
nent early fanciers of the variety. According to other versions Pile
Game and Silver Gray Dorkings were crossed to produce the
Silver Duckwing Leghorn. The Silver Duckwing Leghorn has a
black-white color combination, the red of the black-red pattern in
the male being absent, leaving white. In the female the light-
brown ground becomes white, the dark-brown parts black, while
the salmon on the breast remains. In the Golden Duckwings the
male is of a black-bay, or buff, color pattern, the (Standard)
female so like the female of the silver subvariety that, as a matter
of fact, in English Duckwing Leghorns the silver females are
shown with both golden and silver males, and the golden females
not shown. While the Standard calls for white ground in silver
1 This is true of general flocks; it is not so noticeable in the showroom.
362 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 350. Silver Duckwing Leghorn cock
(Photograph from owner, Thomas Peer,
Fairfield, New Jersey)
females, the variety is
not well developed, and
females are said to be
often not distinguishable
from Brown Leghorns.
Dominique Leghorns or
Cuckoo Leghorns (single-
comb) have the barred
pattern and gray colors
of the Barred Plymouth
Rock. This color pattern
is quite common in Italy.
The specimens which are
occasionally exhibited in
this country are probably
made by crosses of White
and Black Leghorns, or
of White Leghorns with
black or barred fowls.
The Spanish section of the Mediterranean class. The Spanish
group includes five so-called breeds, — Castilian, Black Spanish,
Minorca, Andalusian, and Barbe-
zieux. Of these the first- and last-
named are bred only in Spain ; the
others in their modern form are
largely the result of English breed-
ing, though it appears that in one
case the development of particular
characters was begun on the conti-
nent side of the English Channel.
As already noted, the conspicuous
differences between the Spanish
and Italian races are color of skin
and legs, and the general Span-
ish preference for black plumage.
While designated as_ different
breeds, these Spanish fowls are
properly varieties of one breed.
Fic. 351. Silver Duckwing Leg-
horn pullet. (Photograph from
owner, Thomas Peer)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 363
Originally all were single-combed (as they are still in Spain), the
rose-combed subvarieties having been made recently in America.
Castilian fowls are in appearance unimproved Minorcas. They
are supposed to be the original breed from which the others are
derived. According to tradition they were brought to Spain by the
Moors at the time of the Moorish invasion. If that could be estab-
lished, it would indicate a third line of movement of fowls from the
starting point across northern Africa. Such traditions, however,
are most unreliable, and in a
broad survey of the movement
and development of these races
it appears far more probable
that the Spanish races were
developed from the Italian.
The difference in color of skin
and legs is no obstacle to this
theory, for yellow-skinned races
produce many individuals with
white skin, and popular pref-
erence for black fowls would
lead to the establishment of
white or gray skin and dark ,
legs as race characteristics. ns hee Ps op
The Castilian fowl is in size A ON cee.
between the Leghorn and the Fie. 352. Silver Duckwing Leghorn
Minorca, with color of skin cockerel. (Photograph from owner,
and shanks like the Minorca, EPO)
while the comb is more of the Leghorn style, and the ear lobes are
white tipped with red. Black is the preferred color, but there are
also whites and mixtures (especially the darker shades) of black
and white. Castilian fowls, particularly the black, were introduced
into England and Holland several centuries ago, and from them
came the two varieties next described.
Minorcas (two color varieties, black and white, single-combed
and rose-combed subvarieties of both) were long called Red-faced
Spanish. English breeders made the Minorca, as afterwards they
made their Leghorns, more on meat-type lines, — made it larger
and heavier ; and the fanciers breeding for exhibition carried the
364 POULTRY CULTURE
development of the
comb to such an extent
that it became a mon?
strosity and an imped-
iment. The American
Standard calls for a
bird of finer type, yet
distinctly larger than
the Leghorn and witha
relatively larger comb.
To maintain the size,
the following standards
of weight were estab-
lished: — single-comb
black: cock, 9 pounds ;
cockerel, 7} pounds;
hen, 7 pounds; pullet,
63 pounds; rose-comb
oe ~ =3 black and single-comb
Fic. 353. Single-Comb Black Minorca cockerel} white: cock, 8 pounds ;
cockerel, 64 pounds ;
hen, 64 pounds; pullet, 54
pounds. Black cock birds
over 10 pounds and hens over
8 pounds in weight are fre-
quently produced. In general
outlines the Minorca, as distin-
guished from the Leghorn, is
an enlargement of the type,
showing more straight lines
and angles, because of its
greater size. It is generally
conceded that Minorca eggs
average larger than those of
any other race of fowls. Mi-
norcas are quite as prolific as
Leghorns. The ordinary Black Minorca stock is distinguishable
ha
Fic. 354. Single-Comb Black Minorca pullet!
1 Photographs from owner, Dr. Howard Mellor, Spring House, Pennsylvania.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS — 365
from the Black Leg-
horn only bythe color
of the skin, and
(usually, not always)
by its slightly greater
size. Much of this
stock is mixed Leg-
horn-Minorca. In-
stances have been
known of breeders
advertising Black
Leghorns and Black
Minorcas and _ ship-
ping both from the
same lot. Compar-
isons of Leghorns
and Minorcas based on presumptive constitutional breed differ-
ences are fallacious. Practically there is no difference between
them. The Black Minorca
. a
a
Fic. 355. Rose-Comb White Minorca cockerel
(Photograph by Eugene Hall)
has been commonly pre-
ferred to the Black Leghorn
wherever a black fowl of
the laying type was wanted,
On the other hand, where a
white fowl of this type was
wanted, the Leghorn has
been given preference, and,
as in the case of the black
varieties, the White Minorca
has been used to give size
to the Leghorn.
The typical American
Standard Minorca is usually
more docile than the Leg- Fic. 356. Single-Comb White Minorca hen
(Photograph from owner, H. J. Teetz,
horn, less able, because of Gloversville, New York
its excessively large comb,
to stand low temperatures, and ordinarily less rugged, though that
is largely a matter of the handling of the stock. The rose-combed
366 POULTRY CULTURE
subvarieties in both Whites and Blacks are usually of slighter build
than the single-combed birds. Black and White Hamburgs are
supposed ! to have been used to get the rose combs.
Black Spanish (single-comb), often called White-Faced Black
Spanish, have the same weight standards as White Minorcas, and
differ from Black Minorcas principally in the head furnishings.
The comb and wattles are smaller, more of the Leghorn style.
The white face which is the peculiar characteristic of the breed
was produced by enormously developing the face and ear lobes, —
a less marvelous accomplishment than at first thought appears, for
Fic. 357. White-Faced Black Spanish. (Photograph from owner,
J. II. Warrington, Cornwall, Ontario)
all fowls with large combs and white ears tend naturally to develop
white faces and large ear lobes and wattles. This Spanish variety
has been bred in Holland and England for several centuries. The
white face is said to have been developed first in Holland, but
English fanciers are credited with the extreme development of it.
The Black Spanish was introduced into America and became well
known before the Leghorns and Minorcas. For a long time it
was quite popular, but it always had the reputation of being deli-
cate. The enormous white face was easily injured and was subject
1 The originator of the Rose-Comb Black Minorca declared that he had de-
veloped the rose comb by selection, beginning with single-combed birds with
side sprigs. Experienced breeders are decidedly skeptical about this. One re-
marked to me, “ He was foolish if he did, for it would be quicker, easier, and
better to cross with Black Hamburg.” .
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 367
to skin diseases, and after the Leghorns and Minorcas became
known, the Spanish gradually disappeared.
Fic. 358. Blue Andalusian cock
White-Faced White Spanish
came occasionally as sports from
the black variety.
Andalusians (single-comb and
rose-comb) were first known as
the Blue Minorca. The color of
the female is a slaty blue laced
with darker blue. The color of
the male is the same as that of the
female on breast and body, with
wing flights blue, and the hackle,
back, saddle, and tail blue-black.
This color is produced some-
times (not regularly) by crossing
black and white birds, and in re-
production continuously produces
some black and some white, as
well as blue, specimens. In size
and shape the Andalusian is between the Leghorn and the Minorca.
As usually bred it is more of the
Leghorn than of the Minorca type.
American Standard weights are
cock, 6 pounds; cockerel, 5 pounds;
hen, 5 pounds; pullet, 4 pounds.
The Andalusian has long been
known in England, but is a com-
paratively recent arrival in America.
Here it is a favorite with a few,
but is not generally popular, be-
cause of the uncertainty of color
in breeding.
Other races of the Mediterranean
type. Throughout Europe there
are many races like the Mediter-
Fic. 359. Blue Andalusian pullet
ranean (especially the Leghorn) type in form and size but unlike
it in the color ofthe skin; and though in many cases their
368 POULTRY CULTURE
resemblance to the Leghorn type is striking, on the whole they
seem more closely allied to the Hamburgs and Polish. The breeds
which may be considered quite distinctively Italian in origin are
the Magyar of Hungary and the Lakenvelder of Germany. The
Magyar is said to more closely resemble the native Italian fowls
than do the Leghorns of England. The color varieties of the
Magyar are black, red, yellow, white, and speckled. The variety
called red is the Brown Leghorn with red ear lobes. The Laken-
velder is a fowl of the Leghorn type, with an ermine color pattern
in which the black is more prevalent than in the varieties of the
Asiatic and American classes having that pattern. It is a new
arrival in America and seems to be growing in popularity.
Mid-European laying types. The modern types of the central
European races of fowls, as known in America, have been received
principally from England, after having been modified to conform
to English ideals. To appreciate fully the relations of the Medi-
terranean and mid-European types it is necessary to study the
latter as they were before being taken in hand by British fanciers.
These races may be divided into two general classes, the familiar
representatives of the classes being the Hamburgs and the Polish.
The Hamburg as developed by fanciers is a rose-combed breed,
the shape of the comb being considered a breed character. As
first brought to England they had both rose and single combs,
as the native stocks on the continent of Europe from which the
modern exhibition Hamburgs were originally derived still have.
In these stocks, indeed, the single comb is the more common
and is regarded as most typical. The color of skin and legs is thus
the only general character distinguishing this mid-European type
from the Leghorn, and as in this character it is like the Spanish
races of the Mediterranean class, it is apparent that the idea of
fundamental breed differences between these races has no real
foundation.
The Polish races present, with body type similar to that of the
other races that we have been considering, a very different develop-
ment of head appurtenances. The comb is split, V-shaped, and
very small, and the wattles and ear lobes are of corresponding size.
These head embellishments, so conspicuous in the other represent-
atives of the laying type, almost disappear in the Polish. They
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 369
Fic. 360. Lakenvelder hen!
are often almost invisible in the mass of feathers by which they
have been largely displaced. On superficial consideration and slight
acquaintance with poultry types it seems that in this Polish race,
Fic. 362. Lakenvelder cockerel? Fic. 363. Lakenvelder pullet?
if anywhere, we have a distinctive breed (shape) character, plainly
differentiating it from breeds with large combs and wattles and
no special development of feathers on the head; but, as in the
1 Photograph from owner, Ralph C. Greene, Sayville, Long Island.
370 POULTRY CULTURE
case of the Hamburg, to find the true relation to fowls of similar
body type we must go to kindred and earlier forms. As has been
shown, the Hamburg races are allied to the Leghorns on the one
side, and on the other side are undoubtedly akin to the crested
Polish type. Among the progenitors of the modern Hamburgs
crests and feathered legs were not unknown; the Polish of three
hundred years ago (as shown by paintings of the time) had crests,
beards, and sometimes quite heavily feathered legs. Indications
(not sure but none the less significant) point to a movement
of ancestors of this type from central Asia by a northerly route
through Siberia, Russia, and Poland to Germany, France, England,
and America. This will be brought out in the special descriptions.
Considering large combs (large flesh or skin developments) and
large crests (large feather developments) as racial characters, it
should be noted that they are not essentially distinct characters,
but different developments of the same part, and that while great
development in one direction is not compatible with great develop-
ment in the other, more moderately developed combs, crests, and
beards may be equally prominent features of the same head.
While there are some slight indications that the rose comb may
have come directly from the single comb before or shortly after
the importation of fowls into southeastern Europe, and that the rose
type was preserved by preference in a considerable part of the poultry
in a strip between that occupied by the single-combed type on the
south and that traversed and in part occupied by the crested type
on the north, on a general view of the types and from what can be
learned of their development it seems at least as probable that
rose combs came occasionally from the mingling of the single-
combed and crested types, — not necessarily from a direct cross,
but from some combination. For centuries the races have been in
contact in central and western Europe. The crested type reached
northern Italy and was established in one locality there, but on
the whole found little favor along the Mediterranean ; but from
Germany west the country was a veritable melting pot of the
southern and northern races.
Campines. A small, active race of fowls, which has been for
centuries the common stock of the Campine country in Belgium,
has been given the name of that district. It is thought by some
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 371
Fic. 364. Silver Campine cockerel, owned by
M. R. Jacobus, Ridgefield, New Jersey
that the stock may have
come from Turkey, birds of
exactly the same descrip-
tion having been observed
there by Aldrovandus. Bel-
gian tradition dates the
race in Belgium as far
back as the early part of
the thirteenth century,
four hundred years before
Aldrovandus. If this tra-
dition is true, it would
appear that the race has
been bred, in close con-
formity to the present type,
for at least seven hundred
years. Campines are about
the size of ordinary Leghorns, and are typically single-combed,
though itis said that rose combs sometimes occur. Their resemblance
to Penciled Hamburgs is so great
that a fancier, seeing the birds and
not knowing what they were called,
would unhesitatingly describe them
as Single-Combed Penciled Ham-
burgs. There are two color varie-
ties, Silver and Golden. In the
former both the male and the fe-
male are finely barred (or penciled)
with black and white, with white
hackle. The tail of the male is
black with small coverts more or
less barred or penciled. The Golden
variety has the same pattern as the
Silver, with the white replaced by
bay. About 1890 they were intro-
Fic. 365. Silver Campine pullet,
owned by M. R. Jacobus. (Photo-
graph by F. L. Sewell)
duced into England, and shortly after into America, where interest
in them proved very short-lived. Though developed more on Leg-
horn lines and with fixed color pattern, the Campine as first
372 POULTRY CULTURE
introduced was in other respects very like the little half-wild mon-
grels which constituted the mass of American native stock prior
to the introduction and development of improved stocks. Within
a few years there has been a marked revival of interest in the Sil-
ver Campine in America, due to the introduction of stock much
larger than that of the early importations. This stock is really an
English type of the Campine, bearing the same relation to the
Belgian type as the English-type Leghorns and Minorcas do to
the lighter-weight American types of those breeds. The color, too,
has been slightly changed. The males of the first stock brought
to this country had saddle feathers of the same colors as their
hackles.
Friesland fowls. In Holland there has existed for centuries a
race called Friesland, which is evidently closely allied to the Cam-
pine. The leading color varieties are the same, but in addition the
Friesland has yellow-penciled (yellow and white), white, black, and
cuckoo varieties. Rose-combed fowls of this race were developed
as a separate breed with the name ‘‘ Hollanders,” and are believed
to have been used for foundation stock in making the penciled
varieties of the modern Hamburg.
Hamburgs, as known in England and America, are usually small,
rose-combed fowls of the laying type, with gray skin and clean,
slate-colored legs. The rose comb on the small laying type is the
basis of formation of the group. Although in the American Stand-
ard the shape is described in the same terms for the six varieties,
—Golden-Spangled, Silver-Spangled, Golden-Penciled, Silver-Pen-
ciled, Black, and White, — some of these varieties differ typically
in shape, as would be expected in birds of the same general type
but different ancestry. The name ‘‘ Hamburg”’ was given in Eng-
land about the middle of the last century to all the then-known
rose-combed varieties of fowls of this body type. This name is said
to have been selected because Hamburg was the chief port from
which fowls of this type were imported. This report of its chris-
tening does not accord with commonly accepted English accounts
(to be noted shortly) of the origin of the breed, particularly of the
Spangled and Black varieties.
Penciled Hamburgs (Golden and Silver) were apparently de-
rived from the same stock as the Campine and Friesland fowls.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 373
aed meen Fagan! —Aeaggyyge | As ‘ Dutch Everyday
: : Layers’’ they were
known in England a
hundred years ago.
Even as late as the
middle of the last cen-
tury they appeared in
the London market
direct from Holland.
They have the same
colors as the continen-
tal races mentioned,
except that the golden
ee §=varicty has a black tail.
Fic. 366. Silver-Spangled Hamburg cock! Spangled Hamburgs
(Golden and Silver).
According to some English authorities Hamburgs were a British
race of fowls bred in the north of England for centuries. Con-
sidering the constant communication between the island and the
continent, it may well be that,
though bred in England for
several hundred years, they
were of foreign origin, and the
stock perhaps kept up by fre-
quent importations. Certainly
a comparison of the color pat-
terns of fowls as developed in
different parts of Europe indi-
cates that these varieties must
have originated where all the
other novel styles of markings
did. English breeders and fan-
ciers may be credited with hav- y¢, 367. Silver-Spangled Hamburg hen
ing improved and perfected
these markings and also those of the penciled varieties, but it
seems altogether improbable that they originated them. In size
}
:
i
1 Photographs of Silver-Spangled Hamburgs from owner, Dr. J. S. Wolfe,
Bloomfield, New Jersey.
374 POULTRY CULTURE
the Spangled Hamburgs in America are usually larger than the
others ; they are also plumper-bodied, suggesting kinship to the
Polish. The plumage
of the golden variety is
a dark bay ground with
a black spangle at the
tip of each feather, ex-
cept that the hackle and
saddle of the male have
a black stripe and the
tail is black. The silver
variety has black span-
gles on a white ground
throughout.
Black Hamburgs.
ee nee! ~The Black Hamburg
Fic. 368. Silver-Spangled Hamburg cockerel was probably made in
England by crossing
the Black Game on the Golden-Spangled Hamburg.
White Hamburgs. The White Hamburg is said to have been
produced in America by systematic breeding of the lightest-colored
Silver-Penciled Hamburgs.
Note. Before the Leghorns
became known in America, Ham-
burgs were quite popular, sharing
with other known races of the lay-
ing type the favor of those who
preferred fowls of that type. In
disposition they are more nervous
than the Leghorn and less easily
restrained. In general they have
been considered as good layers as
Leghorns though producing smaller
eggs. The numbers kept now are
not sufficient to afford any reliable
indications of differences in laying Fc. 369. Silver-Spangled Hamburg pullet
properties in the varieties of Ham-
burgs, if there are such differences. The spangled varieties, particularly the silver,
are very plump and meaty when matured. With a great deal of merit, they are
still inferior to the Mediterranean races of their type, and have generally been
displaced by them except as they are bred by fanciers for their color and style.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 375
Primitive crested types. An Asiatic laying-type fowl known
as the Szberian Feather-Footed is found in Russia. Almost nothing
is known of its history, except that at present it is a native Siberian
race. If, as some suppose, it is a very old race, it becomes doubly
interesting as the possible progenitor, or closely related to the pro-
genitor, of the Polish and Hamburgs. It is larger than the ordinary
Leghorn (the males weighing about 6 pounds and the females from
4 to 44 pounds) and has the full form, large wings, and (in the
male) flowing tail of the Polish ; it has feathered legs and a small
rose comb, behind which is a small crest; it is bearded and in
color is generally white or cuckoo.
Pavloff is the name of a Russian race, akin to the foregoing and
possibly derived from it, which greatly resembles the Polish. This
race is found throughout Russia and in Poland. It has the forked
comb and crest of the Polish, and the principal varieties, the
Golden. and the Silver, have the colors and color pattern of the
Spangled Hamburgs. While the two color types mentioned are
best established, and are regarded as “pure,” there are blacks
and blues, regarded as varieties, and a great variety of unestab-
lished color patterns. The race has not been studied as it should
be before any positive conclusions as to its relations to other races
are drawn, but in it and the foregoing are found (as nowhere else)
suggestions of most of the characteristics of native European
races of poultry not plainly derivable from Mediterranean and
Game stocks.
For a long time after their introduction into England, Polish
were called Polands or Polanders. The White-Crested Black Polish
seem to have come first from Holland; and, considering what is
known of the distribution of the type, it may reasonably be supposed
that their present name was the one which they bore on the Con-
tinent, and which indicated the country of their supposed origin.}
Interest in this variety no doubt led to the introduction of others,
the general type (as has been shown) having been common on the
1 Various explanations of the name are given on the theory that the race did
not come from Poland. One is that the name was given because of a fancied re-
semblance between the crest and the cap of the Polish soldier; another, that
* Polish” is a corruption of “ polled,” and that the intention was to describe them as
polled fowls, — an absurd explanation, since the type is quite the reverse of polled,
but it has been seriously given times without number.
376 POULTRY CULTURE
continent for centuries. Polish are as large as medium-large Leg-
horns, but are of plumper form and shorter in the leg. In dis-
position they are quiet and gentle. The crest, when extremely
large, obstructs the sight and is in other ways a burden and a
nuisance, making it necessary to give the birds special care in
wet weather. When moderately developed, it is not detrimental
and, to eyes to which the symmetry of the bird as a whole seems
more important than the extreme development of this feature,
may seem quite as handsome
as the larger crest. Like the
Hamburgs, Polish were in favor
as layers until supplanted by
the Leghorns. The American
Standard recognizes five color
varieties, in three of which
there are subvarieties distin-
guished as bearded or non-
bearded.
White-Crested Black (non-
bearded), fully described as to
color by the name.
Golden (bearded and non-
bearded), plumage golden bay,
roe ae each feather laced with black.
(hocoeapl fram ves Uanesl ta. eee (bearded aid’ 0M
coln, Jr., Fall River, Massachusetts) bearded), plumage white, each
feather laced with black.
Luff Laced (nonbearded), plumage buff laced with white.
White (bearded and nonbearded).
Yolvcrara is the name of a crested race (allied to Polish) found
in the province of Padua, Italy, which is probably an offshoot of
the main stock. This race seems to have been somewhat widely
known long before the Leghorns attracted notice. The name
“Padua” was often applied to Polish fowls and is the general
name still given them in western continental Europe.
European meat types. The European market types of fowls
might, perhaps, with equal accuracy be called general-purpose types,
but so much more attention has been given to perfecting table
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 377
quality in them than in the familiar races of the general-purpose
type that ‘‘meat type’? seems the more appropriate designation,
especially for those varieties made from European stocks without
recourse to the Asiatic blood used in making American general-
purpose breeds. These European meat types have usually been
made by developing the size and meat qualities of the laying types,
— in some cases by selection and feeding, oftener by crossing, but
nearly always with the shape of the laying type preserved. This
is not apparent
when the largest,
best-meated, and
fattest of the meat
type are compared
with the ordinary
specimens of the
laying type, but
comparison of large
birds of the laying
type with medium-
sized or small ones
of the meat type in
the same condition
of flesh will show
that their normal
lines are much the Fy, 371. Bearded Silver-Spangled Polish. (Photograph
same, even though from owner, Lionel Lincoln, Jr.)
their dimensions
differ. “Meat type,’’ however, means more than form carrying
abundance of meat. Quality of meat and tendency to fatten readily
are fully as important as shape.
English meat types. There are three English meat types. The
principal one (and the one most distinctively English) is that of
which the Dorking is the favorite, though perhaps not the earlier
type. This type is plainly related to the Mediterranean laying type.
The others are the Indian Game (already described as a modifica-
tion of the Game type still retaining pronounced Game character)
and the Redcap (a meat type of the Hamburgs). The English
have made one or more meat breeds of each of the conspicuous
378 POULTRY CULTURE
early modifications of the initial type of the domestic fowl, and, as
we saw in the case of the Leghorn and Minorca, and shall find in
the modern general-purpose type, the English tendency is to de-
velop the meat qualities rather than the laying qualities in fowls.
Sussex fowls (called also Surrey fowls), not so well known as
the Dorking, are probably the progenitors of that breed. The an-
tiquity sometimes attributed to the Dorking rests only upon a tra-
dition of little value, and upon the recent finding, in Italy, of fowls
with the characteristic fifth toe. The most authentic records (going
back only a little over a hundred years) indicate that the Sussex
was the earlier type. The Sussex, or Surrey, was developed as a con-
spicuous type, if not the predominant type, in the counties of Sussex
and Surrey, which from very early times supplied a great deal of
choice table poultry to the city of London. The type of the breed
throughout is exactly what would be expected of Italian fowls bred
for centuries for the table. It is larger and better-meated than the
English style of Leghorn, is rather short of feather (suggesting
occasional Game crosses), has a medium-sized single comb, and
is four-toed. The predominating colors are red brown, and yellow
or buff. A speckled variety (mottled red, black, and white) and a
‘Light’ Sussex (with the color pattern of the Light Brahma) are
also recognized. These are the modern varieties. The Sussex of
the middle of the last century are described by writers of that
time as of ‘‘all colors” and mostly four-toed.
Dorking fowls seem to have developed as a strain or race of
the Sussex in the vicinity of the town of Dorking. Compared
with the Sussex they present a more highly developed table type,
having the fifth toe as a regular feature, and having different color
patterns in the modern breed. In the middle of the last century
they were of quite as many colors as the Sussex. There are three
modern varieties of the Dorking,—the Silver Gray (with the
black-white color pattern), the Colored, or ‘‘ Dark”’ (a crude and
somewhat irregular variation of the black-red combination), and
the White. The last-named has a rose comb, is smaller than the
others, and lacks much of the characteristic Dorking size, shape,
and carriage. Typical specimens are not often seen in America
outside of drawings. Red and Cuckoo, or Barred, Dorkings are
also occasionally found in England.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS — 379
Bae eee
Fic. 372. Silver-Gray Dorking cock. (Photo-
graph by Graham)
The typical Dorking
presents highly developed
flesh qualities and relatively
finebone. Thebodyis long,
deep, wide, well rounded,
with prominent breast and
short neck and legs, mak-
ing a massive, rather low-
set bird. Following are
the American Standard
weights. Colored: cock,
9 pounds; cockerel, 8
pounds; hen, 7 pounds;
pullet, 6 pounds. Silver-
Gray: cock, 8 pounds;
cockerel, 7 pounds; hen,
6} pounds; pullet, 55
pounds. White: cock, 7$
pounds; cockerel, 6} pounds; hen, 6 pounds; pullet, 5 pounds.
In the two first-named varieties the standard weights are often
exceeded. Dorkings are
generally reputed a rather
tender race and indifferent
or poor layers. Their good
qualities are not duly ap-
preciated because of sev-
eral features which under
some conditions are objec-
tionable. The large comb
makes the male especially
unable to stand severe
cold weather; the fifth
toe somewhat impedes the
movement of the feet; in
America the white skin is
a disadvantage.
oe
Fic. 373. Silver-Gray Dorking hen. (Photo-
graph by Graham)
Redcaps. The Redcap is a meat type of the Hamburg developed
as a once-prevalent type of poultry in Yorkshire and Derbyshire.
380 POULTRY CULTURE
It is thought to have been produced by crossing the Golden-Spangled
Hamburg and the Black-Red Game. In color it follows the Golden-
Spangled Hamburg quite closely. The shape is what would be ex-
pected in a larger, coarser type of Hamburg, with greater breast
development, due to Game blood. American Standard weights are
cock, 7} pounds; cockerel, 6 pounds; hen, 6 pounds; pullet, 5
pounds. The comb is rose, very large, and gives the name to the
breed. The skin is white, the legs slate. The Redcap has long
been considered one of the
best-laying breeds, equal to the
lighter-bodied types in egg
production, and in meat qual-
ities superior to them, though
not equal to races developed
more with a view to table qual-
ities. It is rarely seen in this
country.
French and Belgian meat
types. The market-type fowls
of France lack something of
the size and substance of such
English types as the Dorking
Fic. 374. Colored (or Dark) Dorking hen and Indian Game. With some
(Photograph by Graham) modifications of the form of
the European laying types,
and with occasional traces of the Game type, the class of French
table fowls represents fineness of fiber in flesh and special capacity
for forcing for market, rather than development of size and quantity
of meat. Most of these races have been developed in the districts
from which they take their names.
Bresse. In the south of France there has been developed a race
called the Bresse, closely resembling the Leghorn but with a re-
markable tendency to fatten. It is bred in four color varieties,
White, Black, Gray, and Blue.
La Fléche. \n this race we have the extreme development of meat
properties on a foundation of European laying-type stock as pro-
duced in France. With weight approximating that of the Dorking,
it is a higher-stationed, more stylish-looking fowl. It is thought
len
eh.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 381
to have been produced by a blending of Spanish and Polish blood.
The color is black, and the high station suggests the Spanish. The
peculiar comb, with two prongs, or horns, suggests a Polish strain.
There is a similar race, Du Mans, with rose comb. The two are
probably akin, but their relations are not known. The rose comb
of the latter indicates a Hamburg cross. As has been shown, the
Minorca (Spanish) in England and America has been brought to
a large size without special development of table qualities. It may
readily be supposed that Spanish stock in France, mingled with
Polish and Hamburg, gave in one place the forked-combed La
Fléche and in another the rose-combed Du Mans, and that in
breeding for market the large size and readiness to put on flesh
and fat were developed without recourse to other crosses. American
Standard weights for La Fléche are cock, 84 pounds; cockerel,
74 pounds; hen, 7} pounds; pullet, 64 pounds. It is said that in
France the weights often exceed 10 pounds for males and 8 pounds
for females. La Fléche fowls are rarely seen in America.
FHloudan, Créveceur, and Mantes, are similar races, the first two
developed, apparently, from a Polish foundation, the other from
the Polish or Houdan by blending with a single-combed type. It
has been suggested that the Bresse may have been used for this.
The Houdan is in appearance a black-and-white mottled, bearded
Polish, with a strain of Dorking blood, giving greater length and
massiveness of body and the characteristic fifth toe. The Créve-
coeur is a fowl of the same size and type but black in color and
without the fifth toe. The Mantes has the mottled plumage of the
Houdan, lacks the fifth toe, and has a single comb and no crest.
All these so-called breed differences are superficial, — just such
differences as variations in ideas of breeders in different localities
would be likely to make in a type developed for the same purpose
on the same body lines. The Houdan is well known and well dis-
tributed in America; the Crévecceur, rare; the Mantes, unknown.
Following are the American Standard weights for these races.
Houdans: cock, 7 pounds; cockerel, 6 pounds; hen, 6 pounds;
pullet, 5 pounds. Crévecceurs: cock, 8 pounds; cockerel, 7 pounds;
hen, 7 pounds; pullet, 6 pounds. These weights are often ex-
ceeded. The Houdan in this country presents considerable differ-
ences in size and shape. Some strains are small and light-bodied,
382 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 375. American type Houdan cock-
erel. (Photograph from owner, C. E. Peter-
sen, Pembroke, Maine)
others quite as large as Dor-
kings, but most are of an in-
termediate type. They are not
usually bred with extreme de-
velopment of crest and beard,
yet most exhibition stocks have
more of these than is desirable
in fowls bred for use. In the
Houdan district of France the
crests are smaller and the birds
better adapted to ordinary con-
ditions. Houdans are as good
layers as any breed and make
excellent poultry. The color
of the skin and legs is against
them in this country.
French Cuckoo. A variation
of the Friesland-Campine-
Hamburg type, developed in
Brittany, with the rose comb
prevailing in the north and the single comb in the south, is called
French Cuckoo. The size and weight of the body are increased
and the neck and legs shortened,
yet without giving the bird a squat
appearance.
Courtcs Pattes (Creepers). This
is a single-comb black fowl remark-
able for delicacy of flesh. In size
they approach the Bantams, — the
males weighing from 3 to 4 pounds,
and the females from 2} to 3}
pounds. It is thought that they
may have been derived from the
Bresse.
Braekel. According to the best
Belgian authority this is simply the
Campine growing to a larger size
in the vicinity of Nederbrakel, in
Fic. 376. Iloudan pullet. (Photo-
graph from owner, C. E. Petersen)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 383
Fic. 377. Houdan hen. (Photograph
from owner, C. E. Petersen)
Flanders, the conditions being
more favorable there than on the
sandy plains of the Campine coun-
try. Putting together this view and
the apparent kinship of the Fries-
land and Campine, the Friesland
appears as the intermediate (and
probably earlier) type, of which the
common Campine is a deteriorated
and the Braekel an improved off-
shoot. The Braekel males weigh
from 5 to 7 pounds, females from
44 to 6 pounds, In shape the body
approaches the Dorking (as does the
body of a Leghorn of like weight).
The Braekel greatly resembles the Leghorn in appearance and
qualities. It is precocious, a good layer, and indeed so like a large
Hamburg or Leghorn that the only warrant for placing it in the
meat instead of the laying class is the fact that for a long time it
has been bred with special
reference to the production
of the celebrated powlets
de grains (corresponding
to our broilers). The lead-
ing varieties of the Braekel
are the Golden and the Sil-
ver, the colors and mark-
ings of these being the
same as for the correspond-
ing varieties of Campines,
except that the ground of
the Silver Braekel is a
creamy white.
Brabant. The Brabantis
a large-bodied, fine-boned
fowl of the Polish type,
occupying about the same Fic. 378. Houdan cock. (Photograph from
position among Belgian
owner, C. E. Petersen)
384 POULTRY CULTURE
races as the Houdan
and similar breeds
in France.
The Asiatic meat
type. It has been
shown that in south-
eastern Asia there
was developed a
large, coarse type
of game fowl — the
Malay — which more
than a hundred years
ago found its way to
Britain and was used
there later to make
Fic. 379. Silver Braekel cockerel. (Photograph from the Indian Game. It
owner, Thomas Keeler, Waverly, New York) has also been stated
that fowls brought
from Asia began to be exploited, about the middle of the last cen-
tury, by men who claimed to have introduced them from the Orient,
and the public became interested in
them ; but at the same time it was
found that there were many such
fowls in America, particularly in
New England.
On the assumption that the Asi-
atic races, — the Cochin, Brahma,
and Langshan, —as now known
and bred in America and England,
are distinct breeds of different
origin, coming from different parts
of China and India, there has
been, since the public first began
to be interested in them, a long Fic. 380. Silver Braekel pullet
series of controversies as to origin, (Photograph from owner, Thomas
5 . n Keeler, Waverly, New York)
precise dates of importations, cor-
rect types, etc. All this has tended to cloud the facts. Having
seen how in the European races the differentiation of breeds and
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 385
varieties has been largely the work of English and American
fanciers, the student of the subject can at once see the reason-
ableness of supposing that precisely the same thing is true of the
Asiatic races. The present resemblances between these races
indicate very close relationship. Resemblances between earlier
types — even types familiar to men still under middle age —
confirm this view. An examination of old descriptions and pic-
tures brings the types still closer together. The testimony of
early breeders as to the instability of color and comb shows plainly
the condition of the stock for some time after the type began
to be popular. And, finally, a description of the type as “one of
the usual breeds or races raised in the United States’ was pub-
lished in “The American Poultry Book” in 1843, — two years
before the first importation of Shanghais from China to England,
and three years before the first importation of ‘‘ Brahmaputras ”
to the United States. The race, at that time called /a/ay, is thus
described : ‘‘ This is the largest of our breeds. Dampier says that
he saw one of this breed so large, that, standing on the floor, it
picked up crumbs from the table. They are mostly yellowish or
reddish brown. The eggs are large and well-flavored. The flesh
of the chicken is not very delicate, and is better adapted to broth
than anything else; in the adult it is coarse and stringy. They
make large capons, but are considered to be very indifferent layers
and not very steady sitters.”
This description fits the Yellow Shanghai, the progenitor of the
modern Buff Cochin, very much better than it does the Malay Game.
Though the Asiatics have the reputation of being most persistent
sitters, the broody quality is by no means universal in the race, and
there are other descriptions of the early types which agree with
this. It is to be noted also that while buff or brown is given as
the prevailing tone of color, the description implies a variety of
colors, and this is in accord with the statements of other writers a
few years later. It is not necessary here to go into an extended
analysis of these statements. Together they establish a probability
that the Asiatic type, called in America and Europe by a variety
of names, was a common fowl over a wide area of Asia, and that
the type, though found in parts of India, was probably first developed
by the Chinese. What is known of the development of other types
386 POULTRY CULTURE
of poultry confirms this view. It may seem a comparatively easy
matter to settle such a question beyond dispute by a study of the
poultry of Asia, but the expense of such investigation is too great
for private enterprise.
Compared with the Malay Game type, with which it was some-
times confounded, the early Asiatic was such a fowl as would
develop from the same stock or (more easily) from an intermediate
type, by general selection for size and constitution. While they had
longer plumage than the European races, they had not the excessive
development of feather which characterizes the modern Exhibition
Cochin and Brahma. The legs and feet were only moderately or
scantily feathered,— sometimes quite bare. The combs were some-
times single, sometimes triple (pea combs). There were no striking
developments of comb or crest. The colors were much the same as
in the Leghorns in Italy,— of the same variety but with yellow or
red-brown shades most popular. As in Italy, no effort was made
to develop elaborate color patterns. While the colors were various, it
appears that by local preference some color varieties had been out-
lined and somewhat developed ; but much of the stock was, so far
as color went, in a condition of mongrelism. To Americans and
Europeans the feathers on the legs and feet were, after size, the most
striking characteristic, and it has been generally assumed that the
Chinese made special efforts to develop this character; but as the
quantity of foot feathering on the Asiatic type as developed in Asia
was no greater than would naturally be correlated with a rather heavy
plumage, this type may properly be considered a strictly utility
type, especially adapted to cold regions and, because of its greater
ruggedness and vitality, growing (under favorable conditions) larger
than the European races approaching it in size. While great size
was the most conspicuous race character, many specimens de- ,
scribed by early American writers were medium or even small in
size. In a general way they might be considered the opposites of
the European laying race as most typically developed in the Leg-
horn. They were developed in the opposite direction not only
for shape but for color of eggs, laying dark-brown eggs, as did the
Malay Game. In flesh qualities they were superior to the Leghorn
only in quantity of meat; the quality of the flesh was similar,
though the meat of the Asiatics was coarser in fiber.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 387
Divisions of the Asiatic meat type. The modern classification
of Asiatic fowls makes three breeds, — Brahma, Cochin, and Lang-
shan,— the order of mention being in accord with the relative
popularity of the breeds when the type was most popular. With
reference to the (supposed) original type of fowl the Cochin and
Langshan are earlier forms, the comb and some other characters
of the Brahma indicating
Asiatic Game blood which
undoubtedly mingled with
the other race from time
to time.
Cochins. Early Ameri-
can and English Cochins
comprised four colors of
the Asiatic type, and (in at
least one of these colors)
a variety of shades. The
Buff Cochin, developed
from the most common
and popular color of the
Shanghai or Malay, was,
until near the close of
the last century, bred and
shown in all shades of buff,
from a lemon-yellow to a
brown called cinnamon- Fic. 381. Buff Cochin cockerel. (Photograph
buff. In these Buff Cochins by Eugene J. Hall, Oak Park, Illinois)
were found, as nowhere
else among the fowls that came to the notice of early American
fanciers, the gradations of color from the black-red of the initial
type to white. The Pheasant or Partridge Cochin retained the
black-red coloration, with the brown colors of the female arranged
in lacings,—a pattern which seems to have been developed in
Asia, though not in the perfection in which it is now found in
our exhibition stocks of varieties carrying the pattern. At the
lower end of the scale of Asiatic colors was the White Cochin ;
at the upper end, the Black Cochin, commonly called the Java.
Of these varieties the Buff was, from the first, most popular, the
388 POULTRY CULTURE
Partridge next but far behind,
om the Black and the White com-
_* paratively rare, though before
the appearance of the Lang-
shan the Black Cochin (some-
times under that name and
sometimes as the Java) seems
to have been widely distributed.
In shape the modern Cochin
of the exhibition type differs
greatly from the early Asiatic
type. In this division of the
Asiatics the development of
feathers on the body and feet
— _——--——~ has been carried as far as pos-
Fic. 382. Buff Cochin cock. (Photograph sible, making the birds (the
from owners, Tienken and Case, Rochester, eng especially) appear ise big
Michigan)
balls of feathers. To heighten
this effect the neck and the legs have been somewhat shortened,
though not as much as appears,
for a part of the apparent short-
ness of extremities is due to the
length, abundance, and loose, fluffy
character of the plumage. In the
most heavily feathered specimens
the shank is completely covered
with feathers, on both inner and
outer sides. Although the feathers
on the body and feet are abundant,
the tail and wing feathers are much
shortened. The American Stand-
ard weights for Cochins are cock,
11 pounds; cockerel, 9 pounds ;
hen, 85 pounds ; pullet, 7 pounds.
These weights are often exceeded.!. The comb is single ; it is small
in the females and, preferably, also in the males, though it is not
Fic. 383. Buff Cochin hen. (Photo-
graph from owners, Tienkenand Case)
1] have had Buff Cochin cocks weigh as high as 14 pounds, and credible
reports give 16 and 17 pounds as extreme heavy weights.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS — 389
unusual to see males with quite large combs. The wattles corre-
spond in size with the comb. The. ear lobes are red. The color of
the modern Buff Cochin, described as “ golden buff,” is between
the light and the intermediate shades of earlier times. In the eastern
United States the tendency of judges has been to favor a very
light buff, while farther west and in Canada a richer shade has been
preferred. In the male, the Partridge Cochin has the same colors
and pattern as the Brown Leghorn, but in the female the ground
is a uniform bay or mahogany red (varying in different specimens)
penciled with dark brown or black, the object being to secure uni-
formity of shade and clear, distinct penciling throughout. The main
tail feathers are black, the wing primaries dark brown. The black
and white varieties need not be described for color.
For utility purposes the exhibition type of Cochin is of little
value. For many years after the stock in fanciers’ hands had ceased
to be suitable for practical poultry keepers, there were here and
there throughout the country utility Cochins equal to (and pos-
sibly better than) the best of the early importations. It is possible
that a few such flocks still remain, but if so they are not known
beyond their own neighborhoods.
Black Langshans. Black Asiatic fowls with single combs were
introduced to poultrymen as Langshans in the early seventies.
They came to England first, from the Langshan district in China.
The importer and promoter claimed for them distinct breed char-
acteristics plainly differentiating them from other Asiatic races.
High station, great depth of body, erect carriage of head and tail,
short plumage, scantily feathered feet, and white or gray skin, with
the legs and toes slatish and the soles of the feet a pinkish white,
gave enough breed characters, in the ordinary interpretation of
that term, to mark the Langshan as a separate breed. As the Lang-
shan began to attract notice, Black Cochins were adapted to Lang-
shan standards, some by introducing the blood of the new race,
others by selection toward the adopted Langshan type. In England,
between the advocates of the tall, Langshan type and the ‘‘ Cochiny”
type, there has been continuous controversy down to the present
time. As a result those who bred away from the Cochin type pro-
duced an extremely tall, stilted type, without beauty and with little
utility value. In America the race is bred more on the lines of
POULTRY CULTURE
(Photograph by Schilling)
Birds from 1 to 2 pounds over
these weights are not unusual.
In general the Langshan of
exhibition type in this country
preserves more of the character
of the Asiatic type at its best
than either the Cochin or the
Brahma. Had it not been for
the erroneous conception of
breed character that demanded
the preservation of the color
of skin and feet against which
people in the United States are
prejudiced, the Black Langshan
might have become very popu-
lar here. It is a hardy fowl and
an excellent layer of the darkest
. Black Langshan cock, owned by
Urban Farms, Pine Ridge, Buffalo, New York
| the Langshans as they
| first came from the Lang-
shan district. In that dis-
trict the Black Langshan,
though modified in many
characters, is plainly a
local black variety of the
common Asiatic type.
White Langshans are
said to have come as sports
from the black variety in
England. A blue variety
of Langshans was made
in America by crossing
Blacks and Whites, but it
has attracted little atten-
tion. American Standard
weights for Langshans are
cock, 10 pounds; cock-
erel, 8 pounds; hen, 7
pounds ; pullet, 6 pounds.
au
: ‘ SS
Fic. 385. Black Langshan hen, owned by
Urban Farms. (Photograph by Schilling)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Fic. 386. White Langshan cock. (Photo-
graph from owner, Paul P. Ives, Guilford,
Connecticut)
391
of brown eggs. The White
Langshan, too, adapted to
our requirements, might
easily have fitted into the
place which the perversion
of Brahma type was mak-
ing vacant, and, for a period
at least, might have been
of considerable economic
importance.
Brahmas, Among the
early Asiatic fowls in Amer-
ica were some gray birds.
We have seen that in the
Cochins the modern fancier
retained the black-red color
pattern and developed three
plain colors, — buff, black,
and white. During the
period when names were
used with little discrimination the gray color types went by various
Asiatic names, such as Gray Chittagong, Brahmaputra, Cochin
China, etc. As known in Amer-
ica and England for over half a
century the Brahma has had two
color patterns described as “light”
and “dark,” these descriptions
giving the names “ Light Brahma’”’
and “ Dark Brahma,” by which the
varieties are designated. The his-
tory of the Light Brahma in this
country is given with great cir-
cumstantiality as beginning with
the finding, by a fancier, of speci-
mens of the breed on a sailing
vessel in New York harbor. This
is entirely credible but does not
prove or even indicate that the
Fic. 387. White Langshan hen. (Pho-
tograph from owner, Paul P. Ives)
392
POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 388. Dark Brahma cock. (Photograph
from F. W. Rogers, Brockton, Massachusetts)
specimens had fixed breed
character. The most that
may be inferred from the
fact is that several speci-
mens more or less closely
approximating this attrac-
tive color pattern were
found in a lot of fowls on
the vessel. Both printed
and oral accounts of early
breeders of Asiatics agree
that the reproduction of
color was uncertain and,
further, that the type of
comb was not fixed. Light
and Dark Brahmas came
from the same parents,
and with them, sometimes,
came fowls of other colors.
Some of the fowls had
single combs, but the pea
comb seems to have been most prevalent, and, being a feature
which might be used to make
differentiation between Cochin
and Brahma more pronounced,
was adopted as the correct type
of comb.
Dark Brahmas. While the
Light Brahma was from the first
more popular than the Dark, and
consequently came to be regarded
as the principal variety, it is
through'the dark variety that it is
most plainly connected with the
Cochin forms of the type. But
for its peacombthe Dark Brahma
is a Silver-Penciled Cochin, —a
Partridge Cochin changed from
Fic. 389. Dark Brahma hen. (Photo-
graph from F. W. Rogers)
TYPES,
Fic. 390. Light Brahma cockerel. (Photograph
from owner, Frank C. Nutter, South Portland,
Maine)
BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 393
@ the black-red to the black-
= white type of coloration,
and still showing, in all
but a few rare specimens,
traces of brown or red
throughout the plumage.
The comb is an immaterial
point, for not only were
Brahmas at first produced
with both pea combs and
single combs, but also a
pea-combed variety of the
Partridge Cochin was rec-
ognized in the American
Standard as late as 1887.
The Dark Brahma of to-
day, without the extreme
heavy feathering of the
Cochin, is bred to the
same standards for weight, and is plainly an intermediate between
the Cochins and the Light Brahma.
Light Brahma. Without prejudice to other varieties of its
general type the Light Brahma
may be described as (from the
American point of view) the
highest development of that
type. Exceeding its nearest of
kin in size, it is the largest
variety of the domestic fowl.
Its color pattern is the sim-
plest and at the same time
the most striking color combi-
nation found on fowls. While
its size and general appearance
(leaving the comb out of con-
sideration) connect it with the
Cochins, it is probable that
the comb came from an Aseel
Fic. 391. Light Brahma pullet. (Photo-
graph from owner, Frank C. Nutter)
394 POULTRY CULTURE
cross. The color pattern, though long peculiar to the Brahma
among American Standard-bred fowls, is one that occurs often in
mongrel fowls and must have appeared times without number in
the evolution of every race which, for any considerable period,
was of various colors. Compared with the color of the Dark
Brahma, the color pattern of the Light Brahma represents the almost
complete elimination of black from the body plumage, while the
tail remains black, the wings black and white (the black or black-
and-white flights concealed when the wing is folded), and the
hackle retains the black stripe. The early Light Brahmas had not
excessive feather development, nor did that feature become seri-
ously detrimental to the variety until about the close of the last
century. American Standard weights for Light Brahmas are cock,
12 pounds ; cockerel, 10 pounds; hen, 9} pounds; pullet, 8 pounds.
The Standard weights for adults are often exceeded in birds much
under a year old.
Note. Though not adapted to the general requirements of poultry culture
in America, the Asiatic meat type, until spoiled by breeding for extreme feather
development, occupied an important position. It was the most satisfactory type
for the production of large roasting chickens, and when properly handled, laid
as well as any other. It was best suited to northerly latitudes and well-drained
soils, and to men with skill and judgment in handling poultry. This class was
dependent for popularity upon the fanciers to a much greater extent than the
laying and general-purpose classes. As long as the fanciers preserved a useful
type, their cull specimens (particularly of the Light Brahma) were much sought
by market poultry growers. When the fanciers developed the type beyond
utility lines, they lost the market for their culls; the poultry growers who had
become dependent on them for stock were unable to procure what they needed,
and turned to other breeds. There is still in the country a great deal of Light
Brahma stock good for practical purposes, but it is widely scattered. Some
effort is being made to bring back the old types of Asiatics. How successful
such an effort may be, only time can show.
General-purpose types. While the credit of developing the mod-
ern general-purpose type of fowl belongs principally to American
poultry keepers, in a sense every effort to improve utility qualities
represents progress toward the combination of laying and table
qualities. The European meat types, as developed from European
laying types, are as good layers as their progenitors, and much better
fleshed. The Asiatic meat type, while carrying more meat than
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 395
most varieties of the European, but generally of inferior quality,
were (with good handling) quite as productive of eggs as any other
type. But the European fowls as a whole lacked the rugged vitality
of the Asiatics, and almost without exception had some superficial
feature to which the plainly practical American farmer objected.
On the other hand, the Asiatics were not only inclined to coarse-
ness in flesh, but were heavy-boned and much larger than was
desirable for general-market or necessary for laying purposes.
Consequently (as stated in Chapter II) acquaintance with the
races of poultry as improved in Europe and Asia moved poultry
keepers in America to efforts to combine these different types with
one another or with native stocks in order to produce medium-sized
fowls of plain type, of great vigor, and adapted to a wide range of
conditions. While these efforts were greatly stimulated by the ex-
ploitation of the Asiatic type, that they began much earlier is evi-
dent from the references to the old Hawk-Colored, or Dominique,
fowls, and from the fact that at least two breeds (the Bucks County
Fowls and the Jersey Blue), formed by combining Asiatic and
native blood, had acquired a name and a more than local reputation
before the first exhibition in 1849.
Early gray-barred types is the most appropriate general descrip-
tion of the color prototypes of the Barred Plymouth Rock. The
color type is a common one, the patterns occurring in all races in
which (or at the stage when) plumage colors are various. Fowls of
this color pattern went by different names. They were sometimes
described as hawk-colored. They were called Dominique, and also
by several variations of that name, — Dominick, Dominiker, Domin-
ican. They were called, too, Cuckoo Fowls. In many cases these
names were given on account of color, without reference to other
points (just as later every barred fowl was called a Plymouth Rock),
but it is quite probable that some of them were of a race with
other characteristics somewhat fixed. Some early American writers
on the Dominique say that it was introduced from France. As the
best type shown in illustrations of the period conforms generally
to the description of the French Cuckoo, it seems highly probable
that that race was the most important factor in fixing the type of
the American Dominique, and that the American Dominique is
no more American than the Leghorn or the Cochin.
Fic. 392. Dominique cockerel. (Photograph
from owner, W. H. Davenport, Coleraine,
Massachusetts)
396 POULTRY CULTURE
Dominiques, as devel-
oped either by amalgama-
tion of early barred types
or by preference for the
type which became fixed
and dominant, were small
medium-sized fowls with
rose combs. In shape and
carriage they resembled
Hamburgs and Leghorns,
though more substantially
built. They were rugged
and hardy, good layers,
fattened well, and made
good table poultry. The
males were much lighter
in color than Standard
Barred Rock males of to-
day, more resembling the
pullet-bred Barred Rock male. The principal difference between
them and the French Cuckoo is the color of the skin.
This type of Dominique has
almost disappeared. With few ex-
ceptions, the type now closely ap-
proximates the Barred Plymouth
Rock in shape as well as in general
shade of color. The barring is not
so clear as that of the Plymouth
Rock, and the birds are smaller,
American Standard weights being
cock, 8 pounds; cockerel, 7 pounds;
hen, 6 pounds; pullet, 5 pounds.
Efforts made from time to time to
revive the popularity of the Domi-
nique have usually been based on
claims of inherent breed qualities
Fic. 393. Dominique hen. (Photo-
graph from owners, Dr. Skerritt
and Son, Utica, New York)
superior to those of the Plymouth Rock, but have met with little
success.
Though rated a hardy fowl in comparison with the
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 397
European races to which it properly belonged, the Dominique
had not the rugged, vigorous constitution of the Asiatics and
of the American types developed by fusion of European and
Asiatic races.
Earliest American general-purpose types. If there were no
other evidence of the presence of Asiatic fowls in America long
before the dates given for their introduction, the existence of at
least two well-defined varieties formed by combination of Asiatic
stock with native stock of European origin should establish the
fact. The Jersey Blue and the Bucks County Fowl, both of this
type, had a more than local reputation and were somewhat widely
distributed before the sensational exploitation of the Asiatic type.
It is possible, too, that the Rhode Island Red type existed at that
time, though the breed was scarcely heard of, outside of the locality
in which it originated, until nearly half'a century later.
Jersey Blues are said to have been made by crossing Black
Spanish with Malays or Shanghais. They were of medium size,
with single combs, red ear lobes, and the plumage coloration of
the Andalusian. After the name became known, it was customary
all over the country to call any blue fowl a Jersey Blue, and the
name was often given to mongrels from chance matings of black
and white fowls.
Bucks County Fowls were developed in Bucks County, Pennsyl-
vania, by crossing Asiatic and native stocks. In everything but
color they were of the Barred Plymouth Rock type. The color
was buff,— usually a dingy buff,— with some black in the hackle,
wings, and tail, and often in other parts of the plumage. Why
this variety, widely known by name and as meritorious as the
Plymouth Rock, failed to attract more attention is one of the
puzzles of the history of varieties of poultry. Considerable flocks
of them could be found in places in the eastern states until after
the Buff Plymouth Rock became well established. In the making
of that variety they were probably used much more extensively than
has been admitted. Certainly they offered the best foundation
stock, having the Plymouth Rock type and a color so closely ap-
proaching buff that they frequently produced specimens of better
color than many of the early winners among Buff Rocks. There
are probably some stocks of Bucks County Fowls still to be found,
398 POULTRY CULTURE
but many of the stocks long kept pure have been converted into
Buff Plymouth Rocks.
Transient forms of this type were produced in great abundance
and in all colors. Among them the type that first bore the name
“Plymouth Rock,” made from a mixture of Asiatic and Dorking
blood, seems to have been for a short period sufficiently popular
to be remembered and to make its reputation something of an
asset to the promoters of the modern Plymouth Rock. This early
Plymouth Rock had the principal general-purpose-class character-
istics, but the color pattern seems to have been indeterminate,— a
black-red type with no fixed pattern in the female. Many of the
birds had five toes, and the legs were of various colors. Consider-
ing the popular attitude toward types of fowls, the almost universal
practice of crossing (among all poultry keepers except the few breed-
ing for definite superficial features), and the numbers of breeders
who were seeking to make a type of general-purpose fowl that
would meet the general demand, it is highly probable that speci-
mens closely approximating or presenting the principal characteris-
tics of every one of our modern varieties of this type were produced
again and again, and for the most part mingled with the general
stock and passed without notice. A few were developed by the
breeders who claimed to have discovered them. Occasionally one
of these attained some reputation, and perhaps figured in the
development of a permanent variety.
Origin of the Barred Plymouth Rock. About 1864 or 1865 (the
date is uncertain) Joseph Spalding, of Putnam, Connnecticut, at the
instance of John Giles, of Woodstock in the same state, mated a
hawk-colored cock with some Black Cochin (then sometimes called
Java) hens. The cross produced cockerels mostly like the sire.
The pullets were mostly black‘or nearly black, but a few were
marked like the males. Reverend D. A. Upham, of Wilsonville,
Connecticut, saw the birds and with some difficulty persuaded Spald-
ing to sell him the best-marked and cleanest-legged cockerel and the
two best pullets. From this trio and its progeny Mr. Upham bred
for several years. While Spalding and Upham were working with
this stock, and before it was introduced to the public, a Mr. Drake,
of Stoughton, Massachusetts, had produced birds of the same general
type and color by mating hawk-colored females with Asiatic males,
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 399
either Light Brahma or White Cochin. Both varieties may have
been used, but the Drake stock showed pronounced traces of
Brahma rather than of Cochin blood.
In March, 1869, Upham exhibited his birds as Barred Plymouth
Rocks, at Worcester, Massachusetts, where they made a sensation
and entered on a career of popularity so far-reaching that within
twenty years it was estimated that they outnumbered all other pure-
bred varieties of fowls in the United States. Their popularity had
brought out other varieties of the type and greatly stimulated inter-
est in them here, while in England the type, though of a color of
skin and legs not favored there, was rapidly displacing the Euro-
pean races, until an English style of the same type was produced
in the Orpington.
Early strains of Barred Plymouth Rock. The instant popu-
larity of the Plymouth Rock! created a demand for them far be-
yond what could be supplied from the Spalding, Upham, and Drake
stocks. Those who were so fortunate as to secure stock from these
earliest originators had, if they used it to advantage, several years
the start of others. Many who could not get this stock made crosses
to produce the type. Though the facts in such cases would probably
not be recorded, no one who knows the ways of poultry breeding
can doubt that there were throughout the country many birds of
this type (in the rough), and that hundreds of breeders began to
mate such specimens as they had or could procure, using blood
from the more advanced lines of breeding when it could be ob-
tained. The best of the early strains were the Upham, Drake,
Gilman, and Essex,—the latter being an improved Upham strain,
developed first in Essex County, Massachusetts, by Mark Pitman,
and later by H. B. May at Natick, Massachusetts. This stock, though
the best of the early Plymouth Rocks, lacked much of meeting the
ideals of fanciers. The stock as it came into May’s possession
seemed to lack stamina. He tried a Light Brahma cross on some
of it, with unsatisfactory results. Then he chanced on a cock de-
scribed as a grade Game, which he thought promised to give the
desired results. This bird (a black-red in color) had yellow legs
and a very full breast. The cross proved most satisfactory. In
1 Until the white variety appeared, the term “ barred ” was not used. The breed
was simply the “ Plymouth Rock.”
400 POULTRY CULTURE
three years the undesirable
features that it brought
had been bred out, and in
the May stock of the orig-
inal Essex strain had ap-
peared the modern Barred
Plymouth Rock. It was in
his work with this stock
that May devised the
double system of mating
necessary to produce birds
that match in the show pen.
The Barred Plymouth
Rock. As bred for exhibi-
Fic. 394. Dominique cock. (Photograph from tion the Barred Plymouth
owner, A. Q. Carter, Freeport, Maine) Rock owes most of its merit
to the May-Essex strain.
The blood has been so widely distributed and so effectively used
that, whatever the founda-
tion, practically all Barred
Rock stock of first-rate qual-
ity presents the character
first successfully developed
in it. Individual taste in
poultry breeders, and indi-
vidual qualities in the birds
they use, tend to slight vari-
ations in stocks, but pro-
nounced strain differences
have quite disappeared. In
color there has been con-
stant improvement. The
ideal, from the time when
Upham first saw the cross-
bred Spalding chickens, was
a bluish-gray bird barred
evenly all over, — both
Fic. 395. Barred Plymouth Rock cock. (Pho-
tograph from United States Department of
sexes of the same shade Agriculture)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 4o1
and markings. It was found impossible to produce this with regu-
larity by mating males and females of the desired shade, and in
consequence the double-mating system
has been used to give this result. There
are really two subvarieties of the Exhi-
bition Barred Plymouth Rock, usually de-
scribed as the male /ine and the female
line respectively.
The Exhibition male is produced by
mating Exhibition males to females of
the same line of breeding, these being
very much darker and less distinctly barred
than the males.
The Exhibition female is produced by
mating Exhibition females to males of the
Fic. 396. Dominique hen ; ;
(Photograph from owner, Same line of breeding, these being much
A. Q. Carter) lighter in shade and usually less distinctly
barred. The color of the Barred Plymouth
Rock is most difficult to describe. It varies in varying lights, and
the effect depends much also on
the width and regularity of the
bars. As now described in the
American Standard, the ground
is grayish-white, the dark bars
stopping short of positive black.
White Plymouth Rocks. The
credit of introducing the White
Plymouth Rock as such to the
public is generally conceded to
O.F. Frost, of Monmouth, Maine.
The Frost stock, considered the
best of the early strains, is said
to have come, about 1875-1876, =
as sports from the barred variety, F16. 397. Barred Plymouth Rock hen
Such sports still sometimes come a ag eds pie arecst ik a
from matings of Barred Rocks seers ere
and, according to the common testimony of those who have had
and who have bred them, almost invariably reproduce only white
Fic. 398. White Plymouth Rock cock, owned by
Urban Farms, Pine Ridge, Buffalo, New York
(Photograph by Schilling)
POULTRY CULTURE
birds when mated to-
gether or mated with
White Plymouth Rock
stock. With sporting
still occurring, it is
easy to accept the
statements of the early
breeders of Barred
Rocks, who say that
white sports were com-
mon. From the use of
white fowls in matings
to produce Barred
Plymouth Rocks it
may be inferred that
white specimens were
often produced in con-
siderable numbers by
direct transmission of
color and by reversion
th
to known ancestors. It is also probable that many white fowls of
this type were produced from
accidental crosses. It is further
quite well established that some
were produced with design to
make a White Plymouth Rock by
breeders who preferred that color.
Up to the time of their admission
to the American Standard, white
fowls of this type went by vari-
ous names. After that the vari-
ations in type were harmonized
and strain differences gradually
eliminated as in the barred vari-
ety. For some time after their
introduction the White Rocks
were usually considered less vig-
orous than the others, but if that
Fic. 399. White Plymouth Rock hen
(Photograph from owner, C. E. Hodg-
kins, Northampton, Massachusetts)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Fic. 400.
Buff Plymouth Rock hen
(Photograph from owner, J. A. Ashline,
Fitchburg, Massachusetts)
403
difference ever actually existed,
it has long since disappeared.
The color needs no special
description.
Buff Plymouth Rocks. As
first shown, Buff Plymouth
Rocks were Rhode Island
Reds of light shade and with
single combs, selected from
farm flocks in the district
where the Rhode Island Red
had become the common fowl.
This was in 1890, when Buff
Leghorns were being intro-
duced to Americans and the
“craze”? for buff color was
beginning. This Rhode Island
Red stock was the foundation for some of the early strains of
Buff Rocks, but seems to have had much less influence on the
variety as a whole
than the crosses of
Asiatic and Mediter-
ranean races which
were made to produce
it directly. The Buff
Cochin with White
Plymouth Rock or
Buff Leghorn gave the
best results. White
Leghorn and Buff Co-
chin were also used.
To some extent the
Bucks County Fowl
and the single-combed
specimens of the Buff
Wyandotte entered in-
to the making of the
race. Like the other
Fic. 401. Buff Plymouth Rock cock. (Photograph
by Graham)
404 POULTRY CULTURE
color types of the Plymouth Rock, it was a type of frequent occur-
rence, and as soon as a demand for it arose, the work of fixing the
type began. With the materials to work with, this process was
comparatively short, and within ten years of its first public appear-
ance the color was quite as good as in Buff Cochins.
Partridge Plymouth Rocks, and the two following varieties,
may be regarded as originally by-products in the manufacture of
Wyandotte varieties of
ers the same color. In most
| varieties of Wyandottes,
and particularly in the
early stages of develop-
ment, single combs have
occurred frequently ; and
the single-combed Wy-
andotte, though perhaps
not of ideal shape, is to
all appearances a Plym-
outh Rock of the color
that it carries. The col-
oration of the Partridge
Plymouth Rock is of the
black-red pattern, exactly
— following the description
Fic. 402. Partridge Plymouth Rock cockerel of the Partridge Cochin,
(Photograph from owner, S. A. Noftzger, North Sonve stocks of this ware
Manchester, Indiana)
ety were made, at least
in part, from Brown Leghorn and Partridge Cochin crosses.
Stlver-Penciled Plymouth Rocks came from the same sources
as the Wyandotte of the same description. The coloration is of the
black-white pattern, following the Dark Brahma style of markings.
Columbian Plymouth Rocks present the Plymouth Rock charac-
teristics with the Light Brahma coloration. While some may have
been derived from other sources, the single-combed specimens of
the Columbian Wyandotte have been a more than sufficient source
of supply.
Javas. As has been stated, the name “ Java’’ was sometimes
given to the Black Cochin. With a more discriminating use of
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 405
names this was applied to large
black fowls with small single
combs and smooth yellow or
yellowish legs. In the early
history of the Barred Plymouth
Rock many black specimens
were produced. These seem
to have been the chief source
of supply, though doubtless
other black fowls were used.
The Black Java was the prin-
cipal variety given this name,
but there were also white and
mottled (black-and-white) birds
of this type, — these being
colors likely to occur in rever-
sion and (coming from the Java
stock) to be considered as be-
longing to that breed. None
Fic. 403. Columbian Plymouth Rock
cockerel. (Photograph from owner,
S.C. Allen, Orchard Park, New York)
of the varieties of the Java have ever been popular. As varieties
of the Plymouth Rock they might have fared better.
Fic. 404. Columbian Plymouth Rock pullets. (Photograph from owner,
S. C. Allen)
406
Fic. 405. Silver-Laced Wyandotte
hen, owned by J. C. Patterson,
Monsey, New York. (Photograph
by Schilling)
POULTRY CULTURE
The Wyandottes. The popu-
larity of the Barred Plymouth Rock
led to a search for, and to the de-
velopment of, another breed even
earlier than the development of
the white variety of the Plymouth
Rock. The ideal of the Barred
Plymouth Rock was definitely fixed
from the beginning of the history
of the breed. Not so, apparently,
was the ideal of the first of the
Wyandottes, —a name conferred
on them in 1883, when they were
admitted to the American Stand-
ard. Prior to that time fowls of
the general-purpose type with rose
combs went by a number of names,
the most familiar of which was
“ American Sebright.” With this explanation to show the fact, the
statement of the develop-
ment of the breed is simpli-
fied by applying the present
name to it at all stages.
The Stlver-Laced Wyan-
dotte. Accounts of the ori-
gin of this variety are very
unsatisfactory ; the most cir-
cumstantial of them credits
a Mr. Ray, of Hemlock
Lake, New York, with pro-
ducing, about 1868-1869,
from a cross of Silver Se-
bright Bantam and Yellow
Chittagong (or Buff Cochin),
fowls which he called Se-
bright Cochins, which be-
came the foundation stock
of this variety. These birds
Fic. 406. Silver-Laced Wyandotte cock,
owned by J. C. Patterson. (Photograph
by Schilling)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS = 407
were not distinctly laced and
showed considerable yellow.
They had both rose and
single combs. On this foun-
dation were used crosses of
Silver-Spangled Hamburg
and Dark Brahma, and also
a black fowl known as a
Breda, of supposed Rus-
sian origin. This does not
strike the student of races of
poultry as a likely account.
While it is not impossible
that poor lacing from a
bantam source might be
intensified by adding to it
spangling, penciling, and
black, it is improbable. A
more credible though not
well-attested account says
that a general-purpose type of
fowl, with the laced pattern not
regularly developed, ranging in
Fic. 408. Golden-Laced Wyandotte
hen. (Photograph from owners,
Wood and Freeman)
Fic. 407. Golden-Laced Wyandotte cock
(Photograph from owners, Wood and
Freeman, Fitchburg, Massachusetts)
Fic. 409. Three-quarters rear view
of Golden-Laced Wyandotte cock
in Fig. 407
408 POULTRY CULTURE
shade from very light to very dark, and with both rose and single
combs, was a common type in one or more communities in the
state of New York, and furnished the material from which the Sil-
ver Wyandotte was developed, largely by selection. This version
carries more probability than the other, even though it offers no
explanation of the origin of the color pattern and makes no attempt
to show what elements composed the stock. It makes the Silver
Wyandotte one of the numerous
types early developed in efforts
to fix a general-purpose type,
making some progress locally on
its merits and, after the success
of the Barred Rock had stimu-
lated breeders to new efforts,
taken up for the development of
the ideal of which it was then
only a suggestion. The favorite
type of the early Silver Wyan-
dottes was much darker than that
with which breeders are now
familiar. The modern exhibition
birds of this variety have the
color of the Silver Polish, but
with black tails.
Fic. 410, White Wyandotte cock, FivkGolanis bated Wyandotte
owned by J. W. Andrews, Dighton, 7 . 7
Massachusetts was produced in Wisconsin by
crossing the silver-laced variety
with a local breed known as the Winnebago, the origin of which is
unknown.! The color pattern is the same as in the silver-laced
1 In“ Wyandottes: Silver, Golden, Black, and White,” by Joseph Wallace, 1891,
Joseph McKeen, of Omro, Wisconsin, is quoted as denying that the Winnebagos
had been bred a long time in Wisconsin, and claiming that he originated them.
McKeen places the beginning of his work with the Winnebagos “a few years
after” 1872 or 1873, and indicates that, at the time he crossed them with the Silver-
Laced Wyandottes, they were in a very crude condition. At about the time when
McKeen said that he was beginning to make the Winnebagos, the author, then a
boy in Galena, Illinois, bought, in the market of that town, two hens called Winne-
bagos, of a redder ground color than the early Golden Wyandottes, and as well laced
as the average Golden Wyandotte of fifteen to twenty years later. No doubt
McKeen owed much more to such Winnebagos than he was willing to admit.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Fic. 411. White Wyandotte pullet,
owned by A. G. Duston, South
Framingham, Massachusetts. (Pho-
tograph by Sewell)
409
variety, with a ground of golden bay
instead of white.
White Wyandottes were produced
as sports from the lighter specimens
of the early silver-laced variety, and
also (it may safely be presumed) by
every cross that promised a rose-
combed white fowl of this general
type. In fact, for a long time after
the variety was introduced, any rose-
combed white fowl with yellow legs
that was larger than an ordinary Leg-
horn was offered, and often passed,
as a White Wyandotte. The stock,
as introduced in 1885 by Reverend
B.M. Briggs, then of Wyandale, New
York, was of Silver-Laced Wyandotte origin. The very heavy-
bodied, dark-egg strains of some years later bore unmistakable
traces of Light Brahma blood. As with other American varieties
time and wide distribution of
the best stocks has gradually
produced great uniformity of
type. After the Barred Plym-
outh Rock, the White Wyan-
dotte became the most popular
variety in America; and within
ten years of its introduction it
was regarded ‘as a dangerous
rival of the Barred Plymouth
Rock. Had the competition
been between the Barred Plym-
outh Rock and the White Wy-
andotte alone, the latter would
have led in the end, but the
White Wyandotte had to divide
with the White Plymouth Rock
the favor of those who wanted
a white fowl of its class.
Fic. 412. White Wyandotte cockerel,
owned by J. W. Andrews, Dighton,
Massachusetts
410 POULTRY CULTURE
Fig. y13. Black Wyandotte cock. (Pho-
tograph from owner. Tr. Ss. Chattee.
Kutland, Vermont)
Ur
‘
SA ORS
Fic. 415. Buff Wyandotte cockerel
(Photograph by E. J. Hall)
The Buff Wyandotte. The
history of this variety closely
parallels that of the Buff
Plymouth Rock. It was first
introduced to the public at
the same time and place, by
the same men, and with stock
from the same source, —
rose-combed buff birds from
the farm flocks of Rhode
Island Reds. Elsewhere Buff
Born ae
Fic. 414. Black Wyandotte hen
owned by F. S. Chaffee. (Photo-
graph from owner)
Wyandottes were made from
a variety of crosses, one of
the best being the cross of
Golden Wyandotte and Buff
Cochin.
Black Wyandottes. About
the time that white specimens
from Silver: Laced W yandottes
were being bred together to
form a white variety of the
breed, the black specimens,
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS § qI1
which also appeared occasionally, were used by a few breeders to
make a black variety. Black Wyandottes have never become pop-
ular, but a few fanciers have continued to breed them, and the stock
of this variety seen in exhibitions is usually of very good quality.
Partridge (or Golden-Penciled) Wyandottes were made by
crosses of Golden Wyandotte and Partridge Cochin, with the
further infusion, in one of the principal strains (known as the
Fic. 416. Silver-Penciled Wyandottes. (Photograph from owner, James S. Wason,
Grand Rapids, Michigan)
Brackenbury-Cornell, or Eastern, strain), of Rose-Comb Brown
Leghorn and Golden-Penciled Hamburg blood, and in the other
(known as the Western strain), of Cornish Indian Game blood.
These strains were quite distinct until after the admission of the
variety to the American Standard in 1901. Since then they have
been mingled, and the modern stock of this variety is practically
a blend of these two lines. The coloration in the Silver Penciled
Wyandotte is the same as that of the Partridge Cochin.
Fic. 417. Columbian Wyandotte cockerel
1). Lincoln Orr, Orr’s MillS,; New York
(Photograph by Sewell)
POULTRY CULTURE
The Silver-Penciled Wyan-
dotte was produced almost
simultaneously with the Brack-
enbury-Cornell strain of the
foregoing variety, by the same
breeders, and was admitted to
the Standard only a year later,
in 1902. This variety was
made by mating a Dark
Brahma hen to a Partridge
Wyandotte male, and Dark
Brahma and Silver-Penciled
Hamburg females to a Silver-
Laced Wyandotte male, and
by breeding selected speci-
mens from the offspring of
these matings. The coloration
is the same as of the Dark
Brahma.
Columbian Wyandottes were introduced in 1893 by B. M.
Briggs (who introduced the White Wyandottes). The name was
given in honor of the Columbian Exposition in progress at the
time. The color and markings
are the same as of the Light
Brahma. In the original Briggs
stock the color was produced first
from a chance mating of a White
Wyandotte cock and a Barred
Plymouth Rock hen. The variety,
when introduced, attracted little
attention. A few breeders took it
up, and some of them, not satis-
fied with the color and having
little confidence in getting what
they desired by selection from the
original stock, resorted to other
crosses. The White Wyandotte
and Light Brahma were used, and
Columbian Wyandotte
pullet, D. Lincoln Orr. (Photograph
by Sewell)
Fic. 418.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 413
also the White Wyandotte and Rose-Combed Rhode Island Red.
Both of these crosses gave birds of stronger color than the origi-
Mic, gig, Columbian Wyandotte
hen. Sunny Brook Farm, West
Orange, New Jersey ®
Fic. 421. Columbian Wyandotte
pullet, Sunny Brook Farm?
nal. The variety is still! in the
formative stage, nearly all breeders
still either crossing or working out
undesirable features introduced by
crossing. Though almost unno-
ticed for about ten years after its
Fic. 420. Columbian Wyandotte cockerel
Sunny Brook Farm?
introduction to the public, when
it began to attract attention its
popularity increased very rapidly.
It is now generally regarded as
likely to become one of the most
popular varieties of its class.
Rhode Island Reds. About the
middle of the last century, by such mixtures of native, European,
and Asiatic stock as were then being made all over the eastern
1 Igil.
2 Photograph by Graham.
414
POULTRY CULTURE
United States, the Rhode Island Reds were developed as the
common fowls of the poultry-farming district of Rhode Island.
Since that time they have developed continuously by absorption
Fic. 422. Single-Combed Rhode
Island Red pullet?
Fic. 423. Single-Combed Rhode
Island Red hen
of the blood of almost all races that have attracted notice, the
red color and the general-purpose type being preserved through
it all. As bred on these farms
little attention was given, as a
tule, to selection for a partic-
ular shade or for uniformity of
color, though a few stocks were
selected with some care as to
such points. In size and shape
they varied much more than is
usual when any form of selec-
tion has long been practiced.
As has been said, the first Buff
Plymouth Rocks and Buff Wy-
andottes shown in America were
light-colored Rhode Island Reds.
In the farm stock single, rose,
and pea combs were found, and
Fic. 424. Rose-Combed Rhode Island
Red cock
1 Birds in Figs. 422-427 owned by Lester Tompkins, Concord, Massachusetts.
Photographs by Schilling.
TYPES,
BREEDS, AND VARIETIES Ol FOWLS
peers OE a
Fic. 425. Single-Combed Rhode Island
Red cock
415
when first taken up by fanciers,
they were bred as three vari-
eties. Later the pea-combed
variety was dropped. It is said
that they were exhibited as
Rhode Island Reds at shows in
southern Massachusetts about
1879-1880. No classes were
provided for them at shows until
about twenty years later. They
were not shown at New York
and Boston until about 1900.
For some years they were very
uneven in color, ranging from
buff to a chocolate brown, with
size and shape quite as variable.
Gradually the color was devel-
oped as a rich, brilliant red with
black in the tail and wings and a little black ticking in the hackle
of the female; the size and shape also were made more uniform
and more in conformity with other American varieties of this class.
For some years after it was taken up by fanciers, interest in the
in bbe y? os
2 HG MED
CLT SS
Fic. 426. Rose-Combed Rhode
Island Red hen
Fic. 427. Rose-Combed Rhode
Island Red pullet
416 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 428. Buckeye cockerel. (Photo-
graph from owner, Eugene Cowles,
Shelbyville, Kentucky)
The intensity of interest there
made a wide impression and at
present it is well distributed
in America.
The Buckeye was first bred
in Ohio as a red pea-combed
fowl before the Rhode Island
Reds were known there. They
differed so slightly from pea-
combed .Rhode Island Reds
that when the originator made
the acquaintance of the Rhode
Island varieties, the name
““ Buckeye”” was discarded.
After the Rhode Island Red
fanciers decided not to con-
tinue breeding a pea-combed
variety, the name “ Buckeye”
was again given to the Ohio
stock, and under that name it
was admitted to the American Standard, with some changes in
description of color and form to give a different breed character.
The Orpingtons. This breed
takes its name from the town of
Orpington, Kent, England, where
it was developed by Mr. William
Cook, the avowed object being to
produce a breed of the general-
purpose type better adapted to
English requirements than the
Barred Plymouth Rock and the
Silver-Laced Wyandotte, both of
which were rapidly growing in
popularity in that country. The
characteristic difference between
Orpingtons and the American
general-purpose varieties is the
color of the skin (gray or white)
Fic. 429. Buckeye pullet (Photo-
graph from owner, Eugene Cowles)
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 417
and legs (black or flesh color).
The typical Orpington is also a
heavier-bodied bird, comparing
with American birds of the type
as do the English Minorcas and
Leghorns with American types of
those breeds. The color varieties
are black, buff, white, variegated
(the “ Diamond Jubilee”’), and
spangled. In some varieties there
are both rose- and single-combed
subvarieties, as indicated in the
following descriptions. Thus in
the Orpington are combined the
: | general form and both styles of
Fic. 430. Single-Combed Black | Comb found in fowls of the Amer-
Orpington pee (Photograph ican general-purpose type.
ia Cae ik Potee Sirie Black Onpingtons (single- and
rose-comb). This, the first variety
of the Orpington, was said by the originator to have been produced
by a series of crosses in which
Black Plymouth Rocks, Black
Minorcas, and clean-legged Black
Langshans were used. English
writers familiar with the variety
in England assert that it shows
Black Cochin blood more con-
spicuously than anything else, and
the appearance of many of the
specimens shown in America sup-
ports this view. The Cochin type,
however, is not the exclusive
type in the Black Orpington.
Fic. 431. Single-Combed Black
Both the Langshan type and the Orpington hen. (Photograph from
long-bodied Plymouth Rock type owner, W. E. Matthews)
are found. Consideration of such
facts indicates that, whatever may have been true of the stock of
the originator, the single-ccomb Black Orpington is at present a
418
Fic. 432. Rose-Combed Black Orpington
cockerel, an immature bird!
POULTRY CULTURE
composite of nearly all the
earlier varieties of black fowls
with single combs. The Rose-
Comb Black Orpington is said
to have been produced by mat-
ing Rose-Comb Black Lang-
shan males with pullets from
the Minorca-Black Plymouth
Rock cross used for the single-
combed subvariety. The black
variety was presented to the
public in 1886.
Buff Orpingtons (single- and
rose-comb). The originator’s
account of the making of this
variety gives the Buff Cochin
as the foundation stock, with
the Golden-Spangled Hamburg
and Dark Dorking as the other
components. The prevailing opinion among disinterested English
authorities is that the Buff Orping-
ton is, aS one writer puts it, “a
refined Lincolnshire Buff.’ The
Lincolnshire Buff is a breed devel-
oped locally, like the Bucks County
Fowl and the Rhode Island Red
in America. The Buff Orpington,
accordingly, would bear the same
relation to it as a Buff Plymouth
Rock to a Bucks County Fowl, or
an improved Rhode Island Red
to the ordinary red fowl of the
Little Compton farms. Whatever
the facts as to the original stock,
here again there is no doubt that
y ay’
Fic. 433. Rose-Combed Black
Orpington pullet!
when the variety became popular, any buff fowl approximating the
type might be passed for a Buff Orpington, and the variety to-day
1 Photographs from owner, II. C. Faulkner, Marshall, Michigan.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS
Fic. 434. Single-Combed Buff
Orpington pullet?
419
is the result of the blending of all
these stocks. This variety was intro-
duced to the public in 1894. To-day
it is rated the most popular of English
varieties in the colonies, as well as in
the mother country.
White Orpingtons (single- and rose-
comb). This variety was said by the
originator to have resulted from crosses
of White Leghorn, Black Hamburg,
Single-Comb White Dorking, and
Cuckoo Dorking. It was brought out
in 1889. The appearance of the White
Orpington indicates White Cochin
blood as one of its important factors.
With the White Dorking this would
produce the type more directly and more uniformly than the more
complex crosses. As the
variety was made just after
the White Wyandotte and
White Plymouth Rock in
this country, these might
easily have been used in the
making of it. Indeed, with
the two styles of comb the
White Orpington, like the
white varieties of the class
in this country, made a place
for any smooth-legged fowl,
of the color desired, not
readily referred to a previ-
ously existing breed.
Diamond Jubilee Orping-
tons (single- and rose-comb)
were brought out in 1897,
the year of the Diamond
Fic. 435. Single-Combed Buff Orpington
cock, a rugged type?
1 Photograph from owner, Miss H. E. Hooker, South Hadley, Massachusetts.
? Photograph from United States Department of Agriculture.
420
Fic. 436. Single-Combed Buff Orpington
cock, a very meaty specimen!
POULTRY CULTURE
Jubilee of Queen Victoria, —
hence the name. The variety
is said to have been produced
in the same way as the Buff
Orpington stock of the orig-
inator, but with speckled in-
stead of Dark Dorkings. The
color is a mixture of black,
brown, and white (such as has
always occurred occasionally in
flocks of mixed colors) ; this
variety was bred with the pur-
pose of securing uniform dis-
tribution of the several colors,
and a more pleasing effect
than a nondescript pattern.
Spangled Orpingtons (single-
and rose-comb) are black-and-
white mottled fowls said by
the originator to have been produced by a mingling of Dark Dork-
ing, Barred Plymouth Rock, and Silver
Spangled Hamburg; they are declared
by other English authorities to be identi-
cal with the Speckled Sussex. Spangled
Orpingtons were introduced to the pub-
lic in 1899.
Norte. These six breeds (the Plymouth Rock,
Java, Wyandotte, Rhode Island Red, Buckeye,
and Orpington), with some thirty varieties and
subvarieties, furnish, in the standard size, weight,
and shape of body of each, all gradations be-
tween the Leghorn laying type and the Asiatic
meat type; in combs, all the principal styles; in
colors and color patterns, almost all the distinct
types found in other classes of fowls. Taking
any one of these varieties, as the different stocks
Fic. 437. Single-Combed
Buff Orpington hen
and as the birds in the flocks run, we find in it specimens of most (sometimes
all) of the other types, and all the intermediate sizes and forms. Not only so,
1 Photographs, Figs. 436-439 from owner, J. W. Clark, Cainsville, Ontario.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 421
but in the larger races are often found specimens and strains with the
Asiatic body type, and in the smaller races specimens and strains with the
body type of the small European races. The standard type in any case is
simply the pattern or model selected for the breed. The proportion of any
flock approaching it depends on the selection of the breeding stock and the de-
velopment of the young stock. The ideal shape is preserved only in flocks
carefully selected for that character, and so reared that full development is se-
cured. Inwhat are called the practical qualities, —egg production and meat prop-
erties, — and in their adaptation to climatic and soil conditions and environment,
they are substantially the same. The differences constantly observed between
flocks of different breeds, varieties, and subvarieties are no greater than those
constantly observed between stocks, flocks, and individuals of the same variety.
Special excellence in any character or combination of characters, secured
and made characteristic of a stock or strain by a breeder, may be in a measure
transmitted to other stocks, and may persist for a while in his stock under un-
favorable conditions, and even reappear in individuals after having been lost
for some generations. Certain desirable characters or traits may be very persist-
ent in some lines of blood in any variety ; undesirable features may be as per-
sistent in other lines in the same variety. These observations apply to all races
of poultry, but apply with particular force in consideration of this class because
of the comparatively narrow range of standard weights and shapes. Descrip-
tions of these, omitted from the separate descriptions of breeds and varieties,
are here given, and with the weights for this class, weights of varieties of like
weights in lighter and heavier classes.
TaBLE XXI. AMERICAN STANDARD WEIGHTS OF MEDIUM BREEDS
Type Breed Cock Cockerel Hen Pullet
Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds
Egg Andalusian . ..... 6 5 5 4
2 Rhode Island Red .. . 84 7 6} 5
2. Wyandotte ; 8} 7k 6} 5h
a Buckeye 9 8 6 5
3 Plymouth Rock. 9} 8 74 6}
2 Java a é : 9} 8 74 6}
oO Orpington. . . gu 10 8} 8 7
Meat| Langshan. . ..... 10 8 7 6
A glance at this table shows plainly the difficulty of making sharp distinctions
of shape in these breeds. The so-called breed types may be differentiated in
verbal and pictorial descriptions, and in occasional specimens, but that in or-
dinary breeding operations they should be somewhat confused is inevitable.
The methods of judging exhibition poultry and the necessities of color breeding
tend also to confusion of body types.
422
Fic. 438. Single-Combed Buff
Orpington pullet
POULTRY CULTURE
Typically the differences in shape of
body between these breeds are as fol-
lows: The Rhode Island Red, compared
with the Wyandotte (which has the
same weights, except for the pullet),
has a long body, described as “ oblong ”;
the Wyandotte, a chunky, “blocky”
body. The Buckeye tends toward the
Indian Game rather than the oblong
Rhode Island Red shape. Compared
with the Wyandotte and Rhode Island
Red, the Plymouth Rock is longer-bodied
than the Wyandotte and heavier than
the Rhode Island Red, with more weight
in the rear. The Java is longer and
narrower than the Plymouth Rock, the
Orpington broader and deeper. To
some extent these differences depend
upon length of plumage and carriage of
the body. As between any breed and one immediately above or below it in
the scale of size and weight, little difference in tendencies and adaptations is
found. Between breeds at the ex-
tremes, considerable differences may
be noted. The lighter breeds are usu-
ally more active and mature earlier,
are less prone to put on fat, and have
a longer productive life than the
heavier, though the latter, while in
suitable condition, are equally good
layers. For table use the Rhode
Island Reds are commonly rated
rather inferior to Plymouth Rocks
and Wyandottes, but this is wholly
a matter of selection for meat qual-
ity. Some stocks of Reds are as
good table poultry as any of the
other breeds of the class. As first
introduced the Orpingtons were
probably of higher average table
quality than the American breeds
because of more careful selection
along that line in England; as
found now they average with the
FG. 439. Single-Combed Buff Orpington
cockerel
others. Choice among these varieties is largely a matter of personal preference
for a particular color, or for a color adapted to some feature of the location.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 423
Continental European general-purpose types. The introduction
of the heavy Asiatic type had less effect on the poultry of conti-
nental Europe than on that of America and England. A few races
were locally developed from mixtures of Asiatic with native stocks
in the period following the excitement over the Asiatic type, but
seem not to have attracted attention of poultry keepers as did the
American and English varieties of this class when introduced
later. The principal races made on general-purpose lines on the
continent are as follows:
The Faverolles were developed in the vicinity of the town of
that name in France, from a variety of crosses on the common
fowls of the district, which
were largely of the ordinary
Houdan type. Brahma and
Cochin males were largely used,
and also Dorkings. Apparently
any large male was considered
desirable. Faverolles differ
from the American general-
purpose type in the color of
the skin and in retaining va-
rious superfluous features, —
the beard, the feathers on the
legs, and the fifth toe. In Fic. 440. Salmon Faverolles hen. (Pho-
their native district all colors tograph from E. T. Brown)
are found. As bred by Eng-
lish and American fanciers three varieties are designated: salmon,
light, and black. The Salmon Faverolles are really an indeter-
minate mixture of the black- or brown-red and black-white color
patterns. The Light or Ermine Faverolles have the color pattern
of the Light Brahma. The weight of males is from 6% to 8}
pounds, of females, from 5 to 7 pounds. They are reported hardy,
very rapid growers, and good layers.
The Bourbourg, produced by crossing Brahmas on common
fowls of the laying type in northern France, has the color of the
Light Brahma, the size of the Wyandotte.
The Estaires, produced by Game and Langshan crosses on
common fowls of the laying type in northern France, are black
424
POULTRY CULTURE
in color, with a rather large single comb. They are about the size
of the Wyandotte.
The Prat is a variety produced in Spain by crossing Asiatic on
native Spanish races. In size it compares with Wyandottes and
Plymouth Rocks. The colors are various,
brownish and yellowish tints predominating.
It is a type similar to the Rhode Island Red,
but with comb and tail more resembling the
Mediterranean races.
The Malines is a Belgian breed produced
by crossing the Antwerp Brahma! and fowls
of the Campine or Flemish Cuckoo stock.
The colors are cuckoo and white, the shape
Fic. 441. Red Pile Game
Bantam cock 2
Langshan. Weights: males, 9 to 11}
pounds ; females, 8 to 10 pounds.
The Huttegem is a mixture of old Bel-
gian with Asiatic races. The colors are
various ; combs both single and rose ; legs
feathered ; weights: males, 9 to 11 pounds ;
=e
Fic. 443. Birchen
Game Bantamcock?
and general appearance much like the early
type of Cochin and
Brahma or like the
Fic. 442. Golden Duck-
females, 7 to 9 pounds. wing Game Bantam hen?
The Breda was pro-
duced by crossing Asiatic on native Dutch stock.
It is supposed that the breed may have originated
from ancient importations of Asiatics, but recent
crosses have given it much of its present char-
acter. The prevalent colors are cuckoo, black,
white, and blue. The comb is rudimentary ; feet
slightly feathered; weights : males, 6} to 9 pounds;
females, 5 to 74 pounds.
Deformed types. Under this head may be
described a few irregular forms.
1 The Antwerp Brahma is a race of Light Brahmas imported direct from China
to the Antwerp Zoological Gardens, and there bred pure.
2 Photograph from A. E. Blunck.
8 Photograph from Hermitage Bantam Yards, Nashua, New Hampshire.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 425
Rumpless, or tailless fowls. In the true rumpless the spine lacks
the normal number of vertebrae, the terminal vertebra is deformed,
and the fleshy formation from which, .
the tail feathers |
grow is wanting. |
The feathers of the
saddle hang down
at the rear as at the
sides. The colors
are various. The de-
formity is not reg-
Fie did, RaseCom’ ularly reproduced, Fic. 445. Rose-Comb Black
Black Bantam hen? but occurs in some Bantam cock. (Photograph
by Graham)
progeny. Many of
the rumpless fowls shown in exhibitions are said to be manu-
factured, the part on which the tail feathers are grown being
removed when the bird is very small.
Frizsles have feathers curved outward
at the ends. This freak feature may be
established if desired, but few poultrymen
are interested in it. The birds are only
used as novelties
in exhibitions.
Silkies. In the
Silky fowls the
web of the feather is hairlike. The plum-
age is generally white. The skin is ‘‘ black,”
They are believed to
| have originated in
Fic. 447. Silver Sebright China or Japan, where
Bantam cock? they are said to be
abundant.
Bantams. Dwarfs come occasionally in all
kinds of poultry, and there are references in
’ Photograph from owner, Grove Iill Poultry Yards,
Waltham, Massachusetts. am
2 Photograph from A. E. Blunck. Bia: 448. Silver
3 Photograph from owner, Brook View Farm, New- Sebright Bantam
bury, Massachusetts. cockerel
3 ee
Fic. 446. Silver Sebright
Bantam hen?
426
POULTRY CULTURE
literature to dwarf races of fowls in Europe centuries ago. The
name has been supposed to come from the province of Bantam,
Fic. 449. White Polish
Bantam cock?
in Java, whence, it is said, were imported
the first bantams to attract attention in Eng-
land. Neither record nor reliable tradition
gives any account of such importation. It
was apparently assumed in order to connect
dwarf fowls as a class with some place in
Asia, at the time when it was fashionable to
give Asiatic names to races of fowls. The
popular name for a dwarf fowl is (and un-
doubtedly was long before Asiatic fowls
came to Europe) “ banty,’’ which probably
comes from the Gaelic
banna, a jot, the small-
est portion of anything, and from which were
derived the Gaelic dean, bzan, little, small.
Economically bantams are of little impor-
tance. As layers they are, as a rule, much
inferior to large fowls. Only the largest spec-
imens of the largest varieties are desirable for
poultry. Most varieties are rather delicate,
Fic. 451. White Japan-
ese Bantam cock 2
especially when young. Fic. 450. White Polish
Common _ bantams — Bantam hen2
that is, those of no par-
ticular breeding —are kept mostly as chil-
dren’s pets. Standard-bred bantams are kept
by fanciers to whom the type appeals and
who take pleasure in working out the breed-
ing problems that it presents. Dwarf types
of nearly all races of fowls have been pro-
duced, and there are a few quite unlike the
large types. Singularly, types unpopular in
large fowls are very likely to be popular in
bantams, while the dwarf types of popular
fowls attract comparatively little notice. The
1 See Williams’s Lexicon Cornu-Brittanicum, a Dictionary of the Gaelic Lan-
guage of Ancient Cornwall. 2 Photograph by Graham.
TYPES, BREEDS, AND VARIETIES OF FOWLS 427
avowed object in every case is to make the bantam, in shape, color,
appurtenances, — everything but size, — just like the large breed
that it resembles. The exact likeness desired is rarely secured —
some students of the types say, never.
Usually the head (and
appurtenances), wings,
and tail of the bantam
are larger in proportion
than those of the cor-
responding large fowls,
and the carriage is dif-
ferent, particularly in
the males, which are
the most insolent and pugnacious of birds, often domineering over
cocks of the large breeds, and always ready to attack anything.
The most common and best-established varieties may be divided
into six groups: Common, Game, Rose-Combed, Polish, Asiatic,
and Japanese.
Common bantams are usually the offspring of unions of ordi-
nary Game Bantam males with small mongrel hens. They nearly
always show something of the Game style,
with various colors. A
family so produced may
continue for some gen-
erations, bred for small
size, with little attention
to color, or a color type
may be fixed without try-
ing to conform to any | a s
Fic. 454. White Co- popular standard. Thou- py¢, 455. White Cochin
chin Bantam pullet sands of such families Bantam cock
appear and disappear.
Game Bantams are principally of two kinds. One, which may be
called the common Game Bantam, is a miniature of the Pit Game.
This is the most common of the established varieties, the black-red
type being most abundant. The Exhibition Game Bantam, modeled
after the large Exhibition Game, is a great favorite with fanciers
Fic. 452. Black Cochin
Bantam cockerel1!
Fic. 453. Black Co-
chin Bantam pullet!
1 Photograph from owner, Dr. J. N. MacRae, Galt, Ontario.
428 POULTRY CULTURE
and a much more attractive bird than the large type, inasmuch
as the proportions which in a large bird give the impression of
absurd extension of extremities produce much less of that effect
in a bird too small to contain, in any part, a suggestion of utility.
There are also bantam sizes of the Malay
and of the Indian Game.
Rose-Combed Bantams are of two
kinds, —the Hamburg type, to which
the description ‘‘rose-combed’’ has been
given as a name, and the Sebrights,
which take their name from Sir John
Sebright, the originator of the type. The
Hamburg type is bred in two colors,
black and white. The blacks, with their
Fic. 456. Buff Cochin :
Bantam cockerel 1 glossy plumage, red rose combs, white
ear lobes, and dainty, stylish forms are
by many considered the most beautiful of bantams. Sebright Ban-
tams have plumage laced like that of the Silver and Golden Polish,
with which the two varieties correspond in color. A peculiarity of
the breed is that the males are hen-feathered, that is, lack the
flowing hackle, the well-developed tail, and
the fine back and saddle feathers which nor-
mally distinguish the plumage of the cock.
Polish Bantams need no other description.
Asiatic Bantams present dwarf forms of all
the breeds classed as ‘‘Asiatics,’’ — Cochins,
Brahmas, and Langshans. The Cochin Ban-
tams, first called Pekin Bantams, came orig-
inally from China. The others were made in
England and America.
A Fic. 457. Light Brahma
Japanese Bantanis are of a very different Bantam pullet2
type from those originating on the continent
of Asia. They have very short legs, large combs, wings, and tails,
and a very erect carriage, bringing the head and tail together.
They are bred in various colors, but only the black, white, and
black-tailed white are recognized in the Standard of Perfection.
1 Photograph from owner, Sidney Wells, Newark, Ohio.
2 Owned by Louis T. C. Loring, Shrewsbury, Mass. Photograph by Graham.
CHAPTER XXII
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, PHEASANTS
Of these four kinds of poultry, including all the gallinaceous
domestic birds other than fowls, only the turkey requires special
consideration in this connection. No standards for the others have
been formulated, though there are varieties in all, and ina general
way breeders mate for the preservation of variety characters. This
chapter describes turkeys in detail. Notes on the others are ap-
pended to it as the most appropriate place for their insertion.
Turkeys. At the discovery of America the turkey, previously
unknown to Europeans, was found in Mexico and Peru, both in the
wild state and.in domestication. The most authentic accounts place
its arrival in Spain, England, and France at about 1624. Before
the end of that century it was well distributed throughout Europe.
Wild turkeys are still found in mountainous and wooded territory
in the South and as far north as Pennsylvania. Modern European
stocks appear to have been derived mostly from early importations ;
American stocks usually come from wild stock brought into domesti-
cation. While records are scant, it seems quite plain that, from the
time of the settlement of the country, the stocks of turkeys in sec-
tions where wild turkeys were found have had frequent accessions of
wild blood, keeping them nearer the wild color and type ; and that
when the wild turkey disappeared from a locality, the domestic stock
usually became mongrelized, but occasionally was developed as a
variety with distinctive color and sometimes with modifications of
form. There are not, however, such variations of size and of super-
ficial shape characters in turkeys as are found in the races of domes-
tic fowls, or even in ducks and geese. Of differences which might be
made the basis of breed distinctions there are none ; color variations
are few, and no attempt has been made to manipulate color patterns
farther than by selection and improvement of the original. Racial
differences are of slight importance, and turkeys are commonly
considered as of one breed with a number of color varieties.
429
430 POULTRY CULTURE
The Wild Turkey as frequently seen alive on farms and in poul-
try exhibitions, and dead with the feathers on in the market, is about
the size of the average mongrel turkey found on farms, but more
compactly built, higher stationed, and closer feathered, appearing
slimmer, though generally heavier than domestic birds of the same
Fic. 458. Bronze Turkey cock. (Photograph by E. J, Iall)
apparent size. In color it is a black-bronze. The skin of the
comb, head, and wattle is a darker, more purplish red than in
the domestic stock.
The Bronze Turkcy is the wild turkey, of the type just described,
as it develops in domestication, under highly favorable conditions
of life, with selection for the improvement and greater brilliancy
of the original color and markings. The type seems to have existed,
pure in some specimens but in general more or less mixed with
stocks longer under domestication (and often degenerated), for
two centuries or more, but not until the modern period in poultry
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, PHEASANTS 431
culture did it attract special attention. Since then it has become the
leading variety, being extensively kept as a pure race and also every-
where used to grade up inferior stocks. Crosses with wild stock
are made at intervals by many breeders of Bronze Turkeys. In
color the male and female are alike, except that the color tone of
Fic. 459. Bronze Turkey hen. (Photograph by E. J. Hall)
the female is more sober. The soft feathers are dull black or bronze,
the wide, nearly straight tips crossed with a wide black band, next
to which, at the tip, is a narrower band of white. The different
widths of these bands and of the bronze tints in different sections
give varying color effects. The long feathers of the wings and tail
are barred black, or brown, and white; the tips of the tail feathers
are banded like the body plumage.
The Narragansett Turkey is probably most correctly described
as a race produced by improvement of stock somewhat degenerated
in domestication. It originated and has been bred chiefly in Rhode
432 POULTRY CULTURE
Island and Connecticut, taking its name from Narragansett Bay.
In this variety the bronze and brown tints are largely eliminated
from the soft feathers, but combine with the black in the stiff
feathers of the wings and tail, while the colors of the bands at
the tips of the feathers are reversed, the wide bands being white
and the narrow one at the tip, black. The general effect is gray.
Fic. 460. Narragansett Turkey cock
The Black Turkey. This variety, though found occasionally in
America, has been developed principally in Europe. In Spain black
is said to be the predominant color. The black turkeys of Nor-
mandy still have an excellent reputation. In England the finest
specimens of the type were long grown in Norfolk, and in America
black turkeys are still sometimes called Norfolk Turkeys, but the
English race is said to be nearly extinct. Black color probably
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, PHEASANTS 433
occurs often in wild turkeys and, mingling with the bronze, is doubt-
less a most potent agent in keeping the color darker than that of
the domestic bronze selected for lighter, more brilliant color.
The White Turkey. When both white and black varieties of a
bird are found, it is usual to consider the white a sport from the
black. While such
sports may occur, the
history of white vari-
eties of fowls shows
that they are largely
made up of white
mongrels which ap-
proach the desired
type. The white birds
derived directly from
mixed colors of the
same race seem to
have come usually
from the lightest-col-
ored specimens of the
parent stock. Hence,
in the case of the
white turkey it is
more reasonable to
suppose that the
white turkeys were
derived by selection
fromthe same general
stock as the blacks,
than to assume that
they came from the
Fic. 461. White Turkey cock. (Photograph by
E. J. Hall)
latter as sports, especially as no cases of sporting are recorded.
The name ‘‘ White Holland”’ has been given to the white vari-
ety of turkey because the color was common in Holland, but it may
safely be asserted that the greater part of the white turkeys in
America have been derived by selection from flocks in which gray
in various shades was the prevailing color. In nearly all such
flocks white specimens occasionally appear.
434 POULTRY CULTURE
The Slate Turkey corresponds in color to the blue races of fowls
and unquestionably comes from a cross of black and white. The
color is rare, and it is doubtful whether it should be considered a
variety in the proper sense of the term. A few flocks are bred for
preservation of this type, but its scarcity and the suddenness of
appearances of small exhibits in the shows indicates that most of
the stock is cross bred from black and white.
Fic. 462. Bronze Turkey hen. (Photograph from Rhode Island Agricultural
Experiment Station)
The Buff or Red Turkeys are produced by the elimination of
black in the wild or the bronze turkey, the red shades remaining and
by selection being made more intense and distributed more widely.
Buff birds, as well as gray and buff mixed, appear frequently in
mongrel flocks. The red turkeys produced at different times in
different places in this country probably came from crosses of such
buff turkeys with the bronze, and from personal or local selection of
the type. In none of the so-called buff turkeys is the color as uniform
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, PHEASANTS 435
Fic. 463. Bronze Turkey cock: one of the mammoths. (Photograph by E. J. Hall)
as in yellow mongrel fowls. The tail and wings are mostly white,
and the buff in other sections patchy and uneven. The variety
known as the Bourbon Red Turkey is supposed to have come
from a cross of Bronze on mongrel buff stock.
436 POULTRY CULTURE
Note. The Bronze Turkey is everywhere recognized as altogether the best
existing type. Considering its properties collectively, it may well be doubted
whether the type can be improved upon. It is a rugged race, growing sometimes
to great size but on the average not up to the standards for exhibition weights
for other varieties.
TasLeE XXII. AMERICAN STANDARD WEIGHTS OF TURKEYS
Cock
Variety Cockerel Hen Pullet
Adult Yearling
Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds
Bronze F 36 33 25 20 15
Narragansett . : 30 20 18 12
Buff, Slate,and Black. . 27 18 18 ie
White . 26 18 18 12
The Bronze, to carry its greater weight, is a heavier-boned turkey than the
others. In the largest specimens (usually old males) the meat is likely to be
coarse-fibered ; in ordinary comparisons of average birds no difference in this
quality is noted. For table form, without regard to size, the favorite type of
the Narragansett is the finest American type of turkey, closely resembling in
shape the Cambridge Bronze of England. The shape of the Narragansett is
as obviously due to selection for abundance of breast meat as the vigor and
size of the Bronze are to vigorous wild blood and to favorable conditions in
domestication. These are prac-
tically the only variety differ-
ences, other than color, found
in turkeys.
Peafowls. Peafowls are
supposed to be natives of
Java and Ceylon. They
have been domesticated in
Asia and Europe since very
early times. The most fa-
miliar variety is that known
as the common peafowl,
about as large as a medium-sized turkey, the adult male having
gorgeous, iridescent blue-green plumage, the female, grayish
brown. A white variety is also frequently seen. These are the only
kinds requiring special mention, although several other varieties
Fic. 464. White Guinea hen with brood
TURKEYS, PEAFOWLS, GUINEAS, PHEASANTS 437
are found in exhibitions. The male does not get his full adult
plumage until the third year.
Guineas. Guinea fowls are natives of Africa. They are supposed
to have been brought to America by the Spaniards very soon after
the discovery of the New World. The familiar varieties are the
common gray, or Pearl Guinea, which has bluish-gray plumage with
white spots, and the Whzte Guinea. Cross-bred birds from these
Fic. 465. Pearl Guinea Fowl at Brook View Farm, Newbury, Massachusetts
two varieties sometimes show part white and part gray with white
spots. There is said to be also a white variety with dark spots.
Pheasants. The most familiar variety of pheasant is the Azxzg-
neck, so called from a white ring about the neck of birds of the
variety as they originally came from China. In England the stock
has been crossed with other varieties, and in what are known as
English Ringnecks and English Pheasants the ring is usually
absent and there are other differences due to crossing with other
varieties. These are all comparatively plain birds. There are many
other varieties, some of which are of strikingly beautiful plumage.
CHAPTER XXIII
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS
Considered with reference to sources from which stock was ob-
tained, the races of domestic ducks bred for economic purposes are
of three distinct types. Taking them as they are, we find but two
types. To one of these belong all economic races of European
and of Asiatic
derivation ; to
the other, the
Muscovy Duck
(a native of
South Amer-
ica), which, like
the turkey, was
given a name
that suggested
eastern Europe
as the place
of origin. The
more common
types of orna-
mental ducks are plainly of the same origin as the large races. They
are dwarfed types, or ‘bantam ducks.”” The rarer and more bril-
liantly colored kinds often seen in aviaries are mostly captive wild
birds, though some, as the Mandarin, are said to be domesticated
in the countries from which they came.
The common wild duck. The Mallard, or common wild duck,
is generally accepted as the ancestor of all economic races of ducks,
with the exception of the Muscovy. Wild specimens are still fre-
quently captured and brought into domestication, and after several
generations become so much increased in size that they will pass
readily for small specimens of the Rouen Duck, which the Mallard
closely resembles in color.
Fic. 466. Domesticated Mallard Ducks. Brook View Farm,
Newbury, Massachusetts
438
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS 439
Common domestic ducks. Our common ducks, sometimes called
“puddle ducks,”’ are a type analogous to the common fowls previous
to the introduction of improved stocks. It is rarely possible to de-
termine satisfactorily whether any particular stock of ducks of this
type now seen is of the mongrel stock which has been distributed
throughout Europe from very early times or whether it has degen-
erated from stock improved within the last fifty or sixty years.
Twenty-five or
thirty years
ago most of
the common
ducks were un-
doubtedly free
from the influ-
ence of im-
proved stocks.
These ducks
were of various
colors, about
half the size of
the Pekin and
Rouen, slow of
growth, gener-
ally inferior as
layers, and of Fic. 467. Rouen Ducks. Brook View Farm, Newbury,
but little com- Massachusetts
mercial impor-
tance. So far as known, no effort was made to improve them in
America; in Europe a number of breeds were developed.
Improved races of ducks. Improved stocks of ducks are of
three general types, — the meat type, the laying type, and the
ornamental type.
Meat types. As most numerous, of most importance, and also
best showing the evolution of types, the table types of ducks are
considered first. The races of this type are the Rouen, Aylesbury,
Cayuga, Blue Swedish, Blue Termonde, Pekin, and Muscovy.
The Rouen Duck. The Rouen Duck bears much the same rela-
tion to the wild Mallard as the Dorking and Houdan fowls to the
440 POULTRY CULTURE
initial type of fowl. While it is entirely possible that this variety
has been developed direct from the Mallard, it is much more prob-
able that it was developed, by long-continued selection for table
qualities, from common ducks of the same color, just as the fowls of
the European meat type were developed from mongrel fowls. The
type was developed especially in the north of France, and takes its
name from the city of Rouen.! The body color of the male is gray ;
the back is quite dark, with a greenish coat, or sheen, becoming
darker green
near the tail;
the under parts
are very much
lighter, the un-
der sides of
the wings and
some of the
feathers under
the wings be-
ing white; the
breast is claret-
colored; the
head and the
upper part of
the neck are
green, a white
ring separat-
ing the green
from the body and breast colors, which extend to the lower part of
the neck; the tail and wings show mixed gray and brown, with
some green; the wing when folded shows a rich blue-green bar
(called the “ ribbon ”’) with narrow white bars on either side. The
female has penciled brown plumage, the general color tone of which
is strikingly like that of the females in black-red types of fowls, and
has the same blue-green and white bars seen on the male. A variety
Fic. 468. Cayuga Ducks. (Photograph by E. J. Hall)
1 This is the view of most of the earlier writers, and considering the nearness
of that town to Paris, the great poultry market, and the custom of giving names
of towns or districts to poultry for which they became celebrated, there seems
no good reason for the efforts of later writers to make the name a corruption of
“Rhone” or “roan.”
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS 441
of the Rouen, known as the Duclair-Rouen, resembling it in color
but having a white neck and breast, is regarded as of the same
original stock, unimproved by fancier’s selection and not crossed
with the Mallard, which was used in the Rouen to give brilliancy
of color. The bill of the Rouen is greenish in the male and
brown in the female; the legs and feet are orange with a green
or brown shade.
The Aylesbury Duck. The Aylesbury Duck takes its name from
the vale of Aylesbury in England. The white ducks of that district
Fic. 469. Blue Swedish Ducks. (Photograph from owner, Sunswick Farm,
Plainfield, New Jersey)
were long celebrated for their quality, and in time the name came
to be applied generally, in England, to large white ducks. No
definite accounts of their origin are given. The natural inference
is that this breed was composed of white individuals from various
sources. Such a race might have been made by improvement and
selection without recourse to crosses with other improved races,
but it is believed that both the Rouen and Pekin have been crossed
with the Aylesbury to restore vitality lost through indifferent breed-
ing. The plumage is white throughout, the bill flesh-colored, the
legs and feet pale orange.
442 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 470. Pekin drake. White Birch Poultry
Farm, Bridgewater, Massachusetts
Fic. 471. Pekin duck. White Birch Poultry
Farm, Bridgewater, Massachusetts
The Merchtem Duck. A
white Belgian type closely
resembling the Aylesbury
is called the Merchtem
Duck. The Belgian bird
is a little smaller and has
blue legs and a dark bean
on the bill.
The Cayuga Duck. The
Cayuga Duck is a large
black duck.taking its name
from Cayuga County in
New York, where it appears
to have been developed as
a local variety about 1850,
though it attracted no at-
tention beyond that vicinity
until ten or fifteen years
later. Stories of its origin
attributing the black color
to the Black East Indian
Duck (also to a black duck
from Brazil known as the
Buenos Airean) may be re-
garded as of very doubtful
authenticity, except per-
haps as to certain stocks.
Black ducks are frequently
found in all races where the
colors are various. The
color is one which would
naturally occur in the varia-
tions of the color of the com-
mon wild duck in domesti-
cation. There is no warrant
for considering this variety
as essentially different from
other improved races.
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS 443
The Blue Swedish Duck. In England and America the name
“ Blue Swedish ”’ is given to blue or slate ducks developed as a color
variety. It is said that the color has long been popular in parts of
Russia, Scandinavia, and Germany, and that it has been frequently
seen in the flocks of Belgium. It occurs occasionally in all stocks
of various colors, but not with the depth and uniformity of shade
and the peculiar white bib on the neck and the two white flight
feathers which have been made standard markings in this variety.
Fic. 472. Colored Muscovy Ducks. (Photograph by E. J. Hall)
The Blue Termonde Duck. The Blue Termonde is a race recently
developed as an established type in Belgium. It is a very large
duck, similar in color and evidently near kin to the Blue Swedish,
but with the white throat an irregular feature.
The Pekin Duck. Brought to England from Pekin, China, in
1874, and to America in the next year, the Pekin Duck had an
even more marked influence on duck culture in this country than
the Asiatic type of fowl had on the improvement of fowls. Like
the Asiatic fowls, the Pekin Duck was of large size and extremely
hardy. It is the common duck of China. Its origin is probably
444 POULTRY CULTURE
similar to that of the early European races, ancestral lines meeting
not in any domesticated stock but remotely somewhere in the evolu-
tion of the wild duck. As nothing is known of other varieties of
ducks in China, the Pekin is here usually considered a white breed.
The history of other races indicates that it is probably the white
variety of a race which, when first domesticated, broke up into various
colors. From the extent to which it has displaced other races in
America and some parts of Europe, it is easy to suppose that if
in China there early arose a popular preference for white ducks,
this color long ago became dominant or exclusive.
Fic. 473. White Muscovy Ducks. (Photograph from owner, Brook View Farm,
Newbury, Massachusetts)
The Muscovy Duck. The Muscovy Duck is a native of South
America, introduced to Europeans, as is supposed, sometime in the
seventeenth century. The name is a corruption of ‘“‘ musk duck,”
This duck is in several respects very different from the common
wild duck and the races derived from it, and is sometimes described
as a distinct species. Many authorities have declared that when
crossed with other ducks the offspring are sterile. It seems, how-
ever, to be well-established that the bybirds will breed freely with
either parent race, if not so readily among themselves. The most
conspicuous peculiarity of this race is that the head and face are
partly bare, as in the normal fowl, the skin being a brilliant red,
roughly carunculated and having a protuberance above the beak
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS 445
corresponding to the comb in fowls. There is a tuft of feathers on
the head which can be raised or depressed at will.1_ Another con-
spicuous feature is the difference in the size of the sexes, the males
being commonly much larger than the females. The Muscovy
Duck has greater power of flight than other domestic ducks, and
frequently perches on branches or elevated places. The color of
the wild race is black with some white on the head. In domes-
tication black, black and white, blue, and white are found. The
American Standard varieties are the colored (black and white) and
the zAzte.
TaBLE XXIII. AMERICAN STANDARD WEIGHTS OF DucKS
Variety Adult drake | Young drake |} Adult duck | Young duck
Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds
Pekin : 5 8 vA 7 6
Aylesbury . 9 8 8 7
Rouen 9 8 8 7
Cayuga . 8 7 7 6
Blue Swedish 8 64 7 53
Muscovy ... . F Io 8 7 6
Nore. The improved races of ducks are all rapid growers, and of large size
compared with the common duck. For special duck plants the Pekin is the
only duck now considered in America. Its color, hardiness, fecundity, and
docile disposition make it far superior to any of the others for the conditions
of production on a large scale and for the requirements of the market. Prior
to the advent of the Pekin, the White Muscovy and the Aylesbury Duck were
used by growers producing for the New York market. The Aylesbury in this
country has never been a favorite. At different times, duck growers have
tried the experiment of crossing the Aylesbury and Pekin, but have invaria-
bly discarded the results, considering the produce inferior to the Pekin. In
England the modern Aylesbury has some Pekin blood, but how much it
is impossible to say. Aylesbury breeders declare that there is very little.
Others assert that the modern Aylesbury is practically nothing else than a
1 This is true as to the feathers on the heads of fowls, ducks, and geese, but
when there are only a few very small, short feathers on the head, they simply
appear rough when elevated. I have frequently observed Pekin Ducks -with the
feathers on the head elevated so that it appeared deformed. In some the action,
or attitude, was so constant that it was practically a deformity; in others it was
only occasional.
446 POULTRY CULTURE
Pekin with white skin and pale bill. The experience of American breeders with
Aylesbury crosses cannot be taken as conclusively showing racial differences,
for similar results might have followed the importation of Pekins of European
stock. It is generally admitted that the Pekin Duck has reached its highest
development in this country. Of other races of this class the Rouen ranks
first, and is considered by many actually much superior in meat quality to the
Pekin, especially when full grown. At that stage it is said to dress more easily
than the white duck. The black (Cayuga) and blue (Swedish) ducks have their
admirers, but make little progress in popular favor. The breeding of races of
this class other than the Pekin is largely in the hands of fanciers. The shape
of all these ducks (except the Muscovy)
is much the same (the body long, broad,
and deep, the breast full and promi-
nent, the keel well developed), espe-
cially in old birds.
In the Muscovy there is greater
breadth, with less depth of body and
little keel. The chief shape difference
in ducks of this general type is the
carriage of the body, and this differ-
ence, it should be observed, is artificial,
the typical carriage being designated
largely for the purpose of maintaining
a semblance of breed difference in
varieties which in practical breeding
tend to become alike. The carriage
of body in American Standard exhi-
bition ducks of this type is Rouen,
Aylesbury, Cayuga, Muscovy, and Blue
Fic. 474. Indian Runner drake (old), Swedish, nearly horizontal; Pekin, a
White Birch Poultry Farm, Bridgewater, little elevated in front. The elevated
Massachusetts carriage of the Pekin is more charac-
teristic of the male than of the female,
and tends to disappear with increase of weight. The typical carriage as shown in
model illustrations is usually the extreme pose of the bird in an attitude which
emphasizes the desired feature. In every point of shape (including size), varia-
tions in individuals and stocks are constantly found to be much greater than the
differences between representatives of the breed type. As layers the Pekins are
rated much superior to other large races, the Muscovy at the foot of the list.
1In 1907 Mr. S. Sato, of Tokyo, Japan, visited this country to investigate
methods of poultry culture and to buy poultry — among other kinds, Pekin Ducks.
I learned from him at that time that the white ducks of China were so much inferior
to the American Pekins that they were not considered desirable to improve the
stock in Japan. According to Mr. Sato, not only this race of ducks but all Chinese
fowls came to Japan by way of America.
TYPES AND BREEDS OF DUCKS 447
Laying-type ducks. The egg-type duck is a type developed in
Belgium, Holland, and northern France as a common, very hardy
duck ; it makes rapid growth, especially the first five or six weeks,
and is meaty, though small in comparison with those just described ;
it is an early layer and very prolific. On the continent these ducks
are of all colors. There seems little doubt that they have furnished
the foundation stock for the Blue Swedish, the Buff, and the Indian
Runner ducks. They still afford material for new varieties.
The Indian Runner Duck. In
England and America the In-
dian Runner Duck was intro-
duced to the public as a native
of India, but in view of the
positive testimony! on that point
it can hardly be doubted that it
is simply an improved color
type of the ducks from that part
of the Continent directly oppo-
site the south of England. The
peculiar erect carriage is like
that of the closely allied domes-
tic Penguin duck. Those who
attribute this character to a wild
ancestral race are evidently not ;
nee : Fic. 475. Indian Runner drake and duck
aware that the “ wild penguin (young). (Photograph from owner, Clay-
duck”’ of early poultry writers ton I. Bullard, White Pine, Tennessee)
and some naturalists was a
fiction. In England the continental stock was sometimes crossed
with common English ducks. American Standard weights for this
variety are drake, 44 pounds; duck, 4 pounds. The body is long
and narrow, the breast well developed. The standard color is fawn
(preferred) or gray and white, in a peculiar pattern, the dark color
occurring in patches on the crown and cheeks, and on the back,
breast, and fore part of the body like a jacket. As layers they surpass
1M. Louis Vander Snickt, of Belgium, in Chasse e¢ Péche, in 1900, stated very
emphatically that the Indian Runner Duck was identical with the ducks of the
same type common in the Netherlands. Against such authority, stories of im-
portations from India (coupled with the information that in their alleged native
land the race is very rare) carry little weight.
448 POULTRY CULTURE
all other ducks known in America, though the average is far below
the large yields which are frequently reported (two hundred eggs
or more per bird per year). They are used to some extent for
broiler ducks, dressing very plump and meaty at from 2} to 3
pounds each at six weeks of age.
Common ornamental ducks. Ornamental ducks include the
Crested White Duck and three varieties of small ducks which are
all of the same type, though classed in the Standard of Perfection
as two breeds, of which one has two varieties.
The Crested White Duck. As usually found, the Crested White
Duck is a medium-sized duck, though the American Standard
weights make it the same weight as the Pekin. They are bred
only as curiosities. Although white is the only color recognized as
standard, other colors occur. The type seems to have been de-
veloped in common European ducks centuries ago.
Call Ducks. Gray and White Call Ducks and Black East India
Ducks are of substantially the same size and type. The Gray Call
Duck closely resembles the wild Mallard, and the coloration fixed
by fanciers is the same as that of the Rouen. The White Call
Duck is of the same derivation, and though given another breed
name, the Black East India Duck is plainly of the same stock.
CHAPTER XXIV
GEESE AND SWANS
Domestic geese in America are mostly of European derivation,
but there are also races from Asia, and the American wild goose
is quite extensively bred in confinement in some districts, and in
such places is largely used to cross with domesticated races. Euro-
pean and Asiatic types are supposed to be from different wild types,
but from the fact that they interbreed freely it is assumed that these
must have been varieties of the same species. While some races
of geese are quite regularly better layers than others, and occasion-
ally an individual gives large egg production, laying qualities have
not been sufficiently developed in any race to justify its description
as a laying type. Geese are kept in domestication usually for their
flesh, but occasionally for ornament. The most appropriate classi-
fication, therefore, isto make two divisions, economic and ornamental.
Economic races of geese. The most important races of geese
are the European races. The influence of other blood on stocks in
the country at large is practically negligible. Our common geese
came with the early settlers from Europe. Our popular improved
races are bred as received in later days from the parts of Europe
where they were developed.
The common geese. The greater part of our stocks of geese
apparently still retain the type and characteristics of the geese com-
mon in Europe since long before the beginnings of history. The
graylag goose is the wild variety from which it is supposed that
the common domestic stock is derived. Except where selection for
white has been made, gray and mixed gray and white are the pre-
vailing colors. While inferior in size to the largest improved races,
the common geese are large enough, when bred and grown well,
to answer ordinary market requirements, and are extremely hardy.
The Roman Goose. The Roman Goose is supposed to be the old-
est of the improved varieties. Although the Italians gave little atten-
tion to color in fowls, it appears that from very early times white was
449
450 POULTRY CULTURE
a preferred color, and is to-day the prevailing color of geese in those
parts of Italy where geese are grown. A black- and- white or gray
variety is also found in parts of Italy. Roman. Geese are said to
be precocious and prolific layers, from sixty to one hundred ten
eggs from October to June being given as the recorded production
Fic. 476. Emden Geese
of individuals. In size and general appearance they closely resem-
ble our common geese. As a variety they are little known outside
of Italy, but some authorities believe that the race has been an
important factor in the development of common stocks throughout
southern Europe.
The Pomeranian Goose. The Pomeranian Goose (also called the
Saddleback Goose) is a common variety, apparently an improvement
GEESE AND SWANS 451
of ordinary stock, found throughout Germany and southeastern
Europe. In size it is intermediate between our common geese
and the heavier improved European varieties. The color of the
goose is usually white; of the gander, white with gray head, neck,
back, and wings. While not known (under this name) in Amer-
ica, the variety is of special interest as the probable progenitor of
Fic. 477. Toulouse Geese
both the Emden and the Toulouse. As the goose has been more
of a favorite in communities settled by German-speaking races
than elsewhere in the United States, it is entirely probable that
some ,of this stock has from time to time been brought here and
merged with our common stock.
The Emden Goose. The first of highly improved European
stocks of geese to reach America was an Emden. The importation
452 POULTRY CULTURE
by James Sisson of Rhode Island in 1826 is better authenti-
cated than the claim that a Colonel Jaques of Massachusetts had
imported some in 1821, though that claim may be correct. It is
even quite possible, as the account of the introduction of Asiatic
fowls shows, that occasional importations were made earlier. At
first the Emdens were generally called here Bremen geese, Bremen
being the port from which the first importation on record came.
In England they were called Emden,- importations to that country
coming, as is supposed, from the port of Emden. The Emden
Goose is described sufficiently for identification anywhere as a large
white goose. The size is easily developed from the Pomeranian
Fic. 478. Captive Wild Geese used as decoys at shooting stand of C. M. Bryant,
East Weymouth, Massachusetts. (Photograph from C. M. Bryant)
by selection or by crossing. According to the descriptions of early
Emden geese in this country, those first imported were not invariably
white, but often showed some gray.
The Toulouse Goose. The Toulouse Goose takes its name from
the city of Toulouse, the capital of a department in southern France
noted for its geese. It was brought to England probably about
1835-1845, and to this country from England many years later.
It is not mentioned by Cocke (1843), and references to it in the
decade following 1850 plainly show that the writers were depend-
ent on English authors for their descriptions. It is probable that
the variety became known here either in the latter part of that dec-
ade or early in the following decade. Like the Emden, it is suff-
ciently described for identification by a general description of size
GEESE AND SWANS 453
and color. A very large, massive gray goose can hardly fail to be
a Toulouse, or a grade bird not distinguishable from the pure or
standard-bred type of the breed.
Asiatic types of geese. The Asiatic types of geese include three
varieties, two of which are classed as China Geese, and the third as
Fic. 479. White China Geese. (Photograph from owner, Charles McClave,
New London, Ohio)
the African Goose. References to these by early American writers
leave no doubt that the type was quite well known through scattered
specimens before 1840. It is quite reasonable to suppose that from
an early period in the trade with the Orient, Asiatic races of geese,
like the Chinese fowls, were brought in at intervals by vessels trad-
ing with China. The striking peculiarity of this type is the knob,
or protuberance, developed on the head at the juncture with the
(o1yQ ‘uopuoT MON
SARTO sapeyD ‘19uMo wo ydes3oj0yg) ‘saa eulyD UMOIg ‘Ogh ‘DIY
454
(oo
uopuoT aa
N
QARIDIA SapeyD
‘laumo WoIj Yde1Z0}0y4q) ‘asaan uvoUyy
‘Igh:
oly
455
456 POULTRY CULTURE
upper mandible. The shape is also different from that of the Euro-
pean races. In profile the body has a more oblong appearance ;
the carriage is more erect; the neck is long and slender, making,
in the smaller varieties, a more graceful type. In color, too, there
is a characteristic difference, the colored variety having a distinctly
brown shade not found in domestic races of European ancestry.
Notwithstanding these differences the Asiatic and European races
interbreed freely and produce fertile offspring. A possible link con-
necting two types is found in the Russian geese, in which nobby
protuberances develop on the heads of old birds, and which some-
times show, in their clay color, traces of the brown shade of the
dark Asiatics.
The China Goose.! There are two Standard varieties of the
China Goose, the Brown and the White. A general description
of shape has been given above. The size is about the same as that
of the common goose. In color the Brows China is a brownish
gray, darkest on the head and back ; the Wzte China is pure white.
The African Goose. As now known, the African Goose is in
appearance a large Brown China, with the brown shade eliminated
(in Standard exhibition specimens) from the plumage. Of the ori-
gin of this variety nothing definite is known. The confusion of
names and the lack of definiteness in descriptions of early writers
make it impossible, in many cases, to determine whether the geese
they describe as “ Chinese” and ‘‘ African” are the same as the
geese now known by those names. Early descriptions of the African
Goose, however, attribute to it brown color (like the Brown China)
and great size (unlike the Brown China), making it quite plain that
the present distinction in color is one of the common tricks of breed
making. The type is one not found in Africa, and considering
the Chinese custom of developing size in practical poultry, it is
much more reasonable to suppose that the China Goose in Amer-
ica is a refined, and the African Goose an enlarged, development
of an intermediate size. Whether either type is of purely Asiatic
blood may well be doubted. In the flocks of the African Goose
usually seen, indications of mixtures with Toulouse or common
1 The China Geese are sometimes classed as ornamental, but though not pop-
ular, their undoubted adaptability to economic uses makes it proper to recognize
them in this class.
GEESE AND SWANS 457
stock are often evident. The relation to the Brown China, too, is
often manifest. No doubt continuous and somewhat irregular cross-
ing has had much to do with these appearances, but it would be
quite absurd to suppose that only recent crosses have influenced
the development of these varieties.
The American Wild Goose. While not, strictly speaking, a do-
mestic race, the Wild Goose, also called Canadian Goose, is a factor
of some importance in commercial goose culture. Along the North
Atlantic coast considerable numbers are bred in captivity, the
young being sold to hunters of wild geese for decoys. Where so
bred they are largely used for crossing with domesticated races.
The progeny of the cross is sterile, showing that this is a different
species. The weight is about the same as the common goose, though
the wild bird, because of its more compact form and shorter plum-
age, appears smaller. The color of the body is gray, the head and
neck black, the cheeks having white marks; some brown color
appears in the flight feathers of the wings.
TaBLE XXIV. AMERICAN STANDARD WEIGHTS OF GEESE
Variety Adult Gander | Young Gander | Adult Goose | Young Goose
Pounds Pounds Pounds Pounds
Wild. 12 10 10 8
China ‘ 12 10 10 8
African . ‘ ‘ ‘ 20 16 18 I4
Emden. oo 20 18 18 16
Toulouse. . ape omee 20 18 18 15
These are ordinary, average weights. A considerable proportion of stock of
the heavier varieties is below the Standard weight for exhibition specimens,
but many specimens are above these weights. Emden and Toulouse geese
5 pounds above Standard weights are not rare in America. In England
these varieties are grown still larger, Emdens weighing 30 pounds for males
and 28 pounds for females; Toulouse, 28 pounds for males and 26 for females.
As a rule, only the Emden and Toulouse varieties are approved by goose
growers wishing to breed a large variety pure. Both are used extensively for
grading up common stock. As they run in America, where the Toulouse is
far more popular, the Toulouse is larger than the Emden and many of the latter
are poor layers. The African is also used to some extent for grading, but the
difference in type makes it less desirable. On the other hand, the cross of the
458 POULTRY CULTURE
Wild Goose and the African produces a mongrel of more attractive appearance
than the cross of the Wild Goose on European varieties. The Toulouse is a
nonsitter ; the other varieties are all sitters. As layers the Chinese Geese are
rated highest, producing usually from forty to fifty eggs a season. The Tou-
louse come next, then the Africans, with the Emdens last.
Ornamental geese. Only two varieties of ornamental geese are
seen in America, and those rarely. The Sebastopol Goose, also
called Danubian, is a white goose about the size of the common
goose (usually a little smaller), with red bill and legs and long,
slender, slightly curling feathers on the back and wings. The
Egyptian Goose is a small goose said to be found throughout the
continent of Africa, probably a distinct species. Though recog-
nized and described in the Standard of Perfection, specimens are
seen here only in collections. It is variegated in color, and is
chiefly interesting to the student of poultry types from the fact
that, of all the geese with which poultrymen come in contact, it is
the only kind which shows the variety and brilliancy of color found
in the natural types of our domestic fowls and ducks.
Swans. The White Swan is the only familiar variety of its
species, the Black Swan being rarely seen. Each is presumed to
be free from other color. The rarity of the birds and their large
size and ugly disposition when handled make it impracticable to
apply in their breeding the methods used for common kinds of
poultry. While ornamental, they are of little interest to the fancier.
CHAPTER XXV
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING
Kinds of reproduction. In the simplest forms of animal life
reproduction is by self-division, the separating parts being (nor-
mally) equally developed. As the scale of life ascends and organ-
isms become larger and more complex, division into equal parts
becomes detrimental or impossible, and the organism at maturity
reproduces by a series of divisions, at each of which there is thrown
off from the parent body a part such as that body itself was at an
earlier stage of development. Still higher in the scale, with life
and its functions growing more complex, reproduction takes place
only when the elementary bodies from two mature bodies unite at
(or very near) the time of separation from the parent organisms.
With the evolution of the sexual from the asexual method of re-
production we are not here concerned. Such facts as the funda-
mental similarity of the forms of reproduction and the necessity
of the higher organisms for diverse parentage, which gave rise to
sex, are elementary in the study of the principles of breeding.
Likeness in asexual reproduction. In the self-division of
simple animal forms the maxim of the breeder “‘ Like produces
like” is, according to our observation, exactly applicable. The or-
ganism resolves itself into like and equal parts. In forms a.little
higher up, the organism resolves itself into parts unequal in size
and development, the larger and more advanced part producing a
succession of smaller parts without change in itself, then dying,
the others (such as survive) growing to maturity and producing
and perishing in the same manner.
Relations of body and germ. The higher we go in the scale
of life, and the more complex the structure of the animal becomes,
the greater the difference, both in size and appearance, between
the fully developed organism and the part which separates from
it in reproduction, until in creatures which reproduce sexually the
germs are (as compared with the body) very minute and of the
459
460 POULTRY CULTURE
most simple elementary form and structure. The germs of crea-
tures differing greatly in every character by which we distinguish
them are so nearly alike in size and appearance that, out of associ-
ation with or proximity to the parent form, their identification is
difficult and ordinarily impossible. Virtually, the germ retains its
primitive form and structure up to the point of separation from
' the body, no matter what may be the development of the body.
But however little the germ, at separation, may show the char-
acter of the body from which it came, under proper conditions it
develops into a body of the same kind, — never by any possibility
into a body of another kind. Like still produces like, but in the
higher organism the likeness of the part called the germ to the
part called the body becomes apparent only with development.
In the simpler organic forms, where self-division results in the
production of like parts, no question is raised as to the possession,
by each of these parts at the time of separation, of every character-
istic of the other. In the higher animal forms, and particularly in
domestic animals and birds, differences between a parent organism
and the germs it has produced, as observed at advanced or mature
stages of the development of these germs, cause questioning as to
how far the germ partakes of the character of the body at the time
of separation from it. That the tiny germ carries in it power to
develop an individual having the general characteristics of the
parent form and race is undeniable, — the evidence is everywhere.
How far the germ contains power to reproduce, in the individual
developing from it, modifications peculiar to the parent form, is
the disputed question. Reasoning from analogy with the simpler
animal forms, the presumption is that the germ carries in it power
to produce (under suitable conditions) an organism identical with
the parent body at the time of separation.
However scientists, in their endeavor to demonstrate laws of he-
redity by exact comparisons of limited numbers in consecutive gener-
ations, may disagree as to the transmission of acquired characters,
the whole practice of live-stock breeders is based on the theory that
from the germ may be developed a creature in every way like the
parent form at the time of self-division, and results of breeding
in general demonstrate that the theory is correct. To the practi-
cal breeder the idea that acquired characters (more correctly, quality
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 461
or grade of character) cannot be transmitted is absurd. On the
other hand his experience teaches him that they are not regularly
and uniformly transmitted, even under the most uniform and favor-
able conditions, and that differences in forms compared at maturity
are due in part to environment and conditions affecting the creature
during its independent development, and in part to modifying ten-
dencies or to factors brought over or inherited from the parent
organism. The nature of these will appear as the phases of inher-
itance are presented.
Beginning of variation. In the simpler forms of animal life,
variation through the influence of environment is plainly a cause
of individual differences. Such differences are evidently acquired
and as evidently transmitted, for, once separated, the parts may
become in a measure unlike through difference of environment.
One may die by accident or through lack of nourishment ; another,
more favorably placed than before, may grow larger than the parent
organism and in self-division produce creatures superior to what
it was at the beginning of its independent existence. Between
such extremes there is a range of possibilities of development, and
always, as long as the parts are equal at division, we can hardly con-
ceive of one possessing at its origin a characteristic that the other
has not. In the higher animal forms, with the germ developing
during a long period independently of the parent body, it is obvious
that, since environment may influence growth, there is opportunity
for much greater modification of the organism during the period
of development, and that, the more highly developed and specialized
the organism, and the greater its possibilities of somatic variation,
the more detrimental to the species it would be to have individual
variations fully and uniformly transmitted. Every slight variation
would start development in a new direction and there would be no
stability in animal forms.
Sex the natural regulator of variation. As long as an organ-
ism reproduces independently, by simple self-division or by divi-
sion and combination of its own elements, its characters will be
reproduced in its offspring, and its tendencies intensified in each
succeeding generation developed under favorable conditions.
While simplicity of structure prevents wide variations, this is no
detriment and may be an advantage to the species. But as the
462 POULTRY CULTURE
structure becomes more elaborate, with specialized parts, each of
which has a number of different qualities, the possibilities of
variation increase, and with the tendency to vary one of its prin-
cipal inherent characters, variation and specialization unchecked
might lead to mongrelism and to the destruction of an established
balance of characters, as it has in many cases in domestication.
Nature checks variation and extreme specialization by making the
creature no longer capable of independent propagation, — making
reproduction contingent upon the combination, at the same stage
of existence, of germs from two different individuals. The orderly
arrangement of natural processes requires that an individual shall
always contribute, in reproduction, an elementary germ of the same
character. Hence nature divides individuals, of each species re-
quiring this regulation, into two kinds, with differences dependent
upon or related to the sexual functions. A right appreciation of this
use of sex is of importance to all breeders of live stock, but more to
poultry breeders than to others, because in most kinds of poultry
secondary sexual characters are more marked and made more
important in breeding, and because in the practical work of the
poultry breeder the sexes are of more equal value than in horses,
cattle, sheep, and swine.
Likeness in sexual reproduction. Observation of numbers of
offspring of the same parents shows that the parental characters
do not combine in the same way in all. When a sufficient number
of cases is considered, it is apparent that any character of either
parent may appear unchanged, but that in general all characters
blend, though not always uniformly. This lack of uniformity,
objectionable to the breeder because he is seeking to secure
uniformity, often seems to him irregular and eccentric. On the
contrary, it is regular, — due to individual variation and to the impos-
sibility of offspring being exactly like unlike parents. The likeness
which the breeder desires is obtained, in individuals of each gener-
ation, only when the parents are so nearly alike, both in appear-
ance and in breeding, that the range of variation in inherited
characters is narrow, and, consequently, differences due to in-
dividual variation are slight. Briefly stated, 7he general prob-
lem of the breeder ts to find like ancestors for all (or as many as
possible) of the individuals of a race produced in each generation,
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 463
This problem is easy if his standard considers few characters,
becoming increasingly difficult as the number of characters con-
sidered is increased, and the breeder's ideals of quality in stock
advance. The problem of the breeder who works to a standard is
essentially the same, whether that standard be, as yet, imperfectly
conceived in his own mind, or elaborated, agreed upon, and estab-
lished by an organization of breeders,— whether the variety is as
yet unformed or has been brought to close conformity with a high
standard; but in the first case he may sometimes use parents
quite unlike (in external appearance) the offspring that he hopes
to secure by a combination of their differing characters, and in the
other, if he uses a parent that is markedly unlike the desired type
in the offspring, it is in the hope of securing either the direct
inheritance of some quality in it, or a blending of some of its
characters with those of the stock on which it is bred. The de-
velopment and condition of such a variety as the Barred Plymouth
Rock afford illustrations of all kinds of combinations to secure,
in a variety of poultry, likeness to a desired type. The early strains
were formed (1) by a number of different crosses of parents quite
unlike ; (2) by selection of such of those cross-bred offspring as
most nearly approached that type; (3) in a particular strain, by the
late introduction of blood of a race radically unlike! those used in
any of the original crosses, but very like the (supposed) original
type of fowl; (4) by a general distribution and mingling of this
strain with others; and, finally, (5) by the device of a double
system of mating to provide for each sex of the Exhibition type
just the kind of parents required to produce it.
The sexes equal in respect to the transmission of characters.
Though consideration of particular cases often indicates differences
in the influences of the sexes in the transmission of characters,
1 The Black-Red Game has been much used by breeders of recently made
varieties to restore vigor and stamina where they have deteriorated through
neglect of those qualities in the keen pursuit of special features of desired
types. A favorite theory with many of the older breeders was that the Black-
Red Game, by reason of its close relation to the original type and through cen-
turies of careful breeding for shape and stamina, could give to the newer races
stamina and stability of type which would remain even when the superficial Game
characters and the color had been bred out. The theory is not altogether fanciful,
though it may not be demonstrable.
464 POULTRY CULTURE
such differences are individual, irrespective of sex.1 This becomes
apparent whenever a sufficient number of cases is considered.
How the line is drawn between asexual and sexual reproduction
is not known. From the fact that in asexual reproduction the
germ carries the possibility of development of every parental
character, the logical inference is that a germ from any individual
will always carry possibilities of development of every character
of that individual. Wide observations of the phenomena of breed-
ing as exhibited in any race indicate that this inference is cor-
rect. Many poultry breeders will declare that the female has most
influence on shape and size, the male on color and superficial char-
acters. Observation supports the assertion that the female influ-
ences size (and shape, which is largely dependent on development)
more than the male, but this influence is exerted after transmission
through the special relation of the female to the embryo, and the
opinion is based mostly on comparisons of the offspring of different
females by the same male. As between two females, the one well
developed and vigorous, the other undersized and lacking vitality,
the offspring by the same sire will (conditions after the embryonic
stage being equal) invariably show marked difference in development,
due first to difference in transmission, but also to difference in nour-
ishment during the embryonic stage. When characters not so mate-
rially affected by the vitality of the dam are compared, none can be
found on which sex has any special influence in transmission.
Prepotency. Observation of the common phenomena of breed-
ing shows that individuals vary in capacity to transmit characters.
Ordinarily, the average of the progeny, even of parents carefully
selected for quality according to the standard used, is distinctly
lower than the average of the parents,— though in the work of a
skillful breeder the average quality of the progeny in each genera-
tion tends steadily higher than the average quality of the preceding
generation as a whole. But there are frequently found individuals
with unusual capacity for impressing upon their progeny high quality
1 This observation, of course, does not directly apply to what is called sex-
limited inheritance, where the sexes differ regularly as to the form in which
they inherit a particular character or characters. Yet in the last analysis it
does apply to such cases, as is seen when a male inherits the male form of a
character from the maternal line, or the female the female form of a character
from the male line of ancestry.
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 465
or rare combination of quality in their racial, family, or individual
characters. This peculiar capacity in reproduction is termed pre-
potency and individuals possessing it are said to be prepotent.
As commonly used, the term ‘‘prepotency ” relates only to capacity
to transmit desired characters. It is not a character or quality in the
ordinary sense of those terms. It is more appropriately described as
a condition of a particular individual in which it reproduces, with
extraordinary accuracy, its racial type or its particular type, accord-
ing as the condition affects or is affected by the common laws of
inheritance. Prepotency is not a definite condition or quality, but
is always relative to average or ordinary potency. An individual
which in the early stages of the development of a stock appears
prepotent might at a later stage rank low in breeding potency. It
has no marks distinguishing it in the individual ; consequently its
occurrence seems erratic. Because of the absence of distinguishing
marks in the individual, the bird which shows externally the highest
excellence in desired characters is always preferred for breeding, and
so undoubtedly many prepotent individuals are never given an oppor-
tunity to show that quality.1_ Because only desirable transmissions
1 One of the most remarkable cases of prepotency was related to me by Mr.
H. C. Rollins, of Woodville, Massachusetts, for many years one of the foremost
breeders of Light Brahmas. In making up his Brahmas one winter, he had one
cockerel reserved for breeding on his general appearance, but discarded him as
not of sufficient merit to be used in a mating from which eggs for hatching were
to be sold at high prices. When females had been selected to mate with the other
males, there were some eight or ten left over, — birds of general high quality but
not considered quite good enough for the regular matings. Naturally this surplus
stock was all put in one house. It was not considered a pen mated for breeding.
Not having eggs enough from the regular matings to give all he wanted for his own
hatching after supplying his customers, Mr. Rollins used eggs from this pen and
found them very fertile. Then, running short of eggs for his orders, he used eggs
from the same pen to fill some orders for old customers in cases where he knew
them and thought they would rather take the chances of these eggs than have
their order returned, and where, if results were not satisfactory, he could adjust
the matter easily. As his own chickens developed, he found the chicks from the
mating of discarded birds a remarkably uniform and superior lot, the average being
above the best of other matings. Reports from customers who had eggs from this
mating were to the same effect. This case, it should be noted, was in the experi-
ence of a man who has no superior as a breeder, and in stock bred in line by him
for over a quarter of acentury. That the prepotent quality was in the male bird was
evident, for the females, while of the same stock, were not all bred alike, nor as
like in appearance as in regular matings. They were simply the remnants of the
several lines of females used in the matings of an extensive breeder.
466 POULTRY CULTURE
are considered in estimating prepotency, and because only a small
proportion of poultry breeders carefully pedigree their stock on
the female side (so that the quality of prepotency in the females
used is not always discovered), the manifestations of breeding capac-
ity to which that term is applied are undoubtedly but a very small
part of the possible manifestations of unusual capacity for the
transmission of characters.
Prepotency and selection. Ordinary cumulative results of selec-
tion and prepotency should not be confounded. Ordinarily prog-
ress in breeding to a type is slow,—inch by inch, as it were. Let
a prepotent individual appear, and its power be discovered, and in
a single generation a breeder may make more progress through
this one individual than in a long term of years preceding. Within
another generation he may have raised the average quality of his
stock to very near the average of the progeny of the prepotent
individual. Within a very few years the distribution of this stock
may have made marked improvement in the general stock of the
variety. This is most noticeable in the early stages of the develop-
ment of varieties, when quality of characters is low or mediocre as
measured by the approved standard, and individual differences are
most marked.! A variety as represented at leading shows (where
the best specimens always come) may show no special merit or ad-
vance for years. Then an exhibitor will appear with a remarkable
string of birds. Immediately his stock is in great demand, and the
next year’s exhibits will show in the stocks of many breeders sim-
ilar improvement due to infusions of the blood of the improved
stock, or to direct purchases of it. Progress by ordinary selection
is always slow — hardly perceptible in the averages of consecutive
generations. Progress by the use of prepotent individuals is
immediately conspicuous.
Transmission of prepotency. To what extent prepotency is trans-
mitted it is difficult to determine. Direct investigations of this point
1 The Barred Plymouth Rock again affords an illustration, and in a leading
stock of that variety. About twenty years ago, H. B. May, after a visit to the farm
of A. C. Hawkins, said in conversation with another breeder: ‘“‘ Hawkins’s stock
has been going back; it isn’t as good as it was a few years ago; but he’s got one
cock there that can put him up in front again. I don’t know whether he knows
it or not, but I think he does.” That cock was Royal Blue. He was both a phe-
nomenal bird and a phenomenal sire and gave his name to the Hawkins stock.
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 467
have as yet afforded no positive conclusions. The consensus of
opinion of breeders, based on general observation, is that prepotency
is transmitted, but it requires very careful analysis of the results
of breeding the progeny of prepotent individuals to show how far
such results are unusual in the sense that the results of breeding
from the prepotent individual were, and how far they should be
considered normal after the prepotent individual had raised the
average of its family or race.
Present and latent characters. ‘‘ Dominance’ and “‘ recessive-
ness ” are terms used to describe the behavior of extreme, or plainly
distinct, grades of characters in sexual reproduction. While each of
the two germs which in this form of reproduction unite to form a
new organism brings to the new organism possibilities of develop-
ing any character of the body which produced it, it is manifestly
impossible that the new organism should develop with characters
in the aggregate equal to the sum of the characters of both parents.
It must be, as has been stated, a composite, in which the characters
of the parents blend, and usually blend very irregularly, presenting
all grades of blending between different forms of a character (as of
color or comb), or a variety of different combinations of characters.
Alternate inheritance, reversion, and atavism. If organisms
reproducing sexually could transmit to their offspring only such
developments or modifications of characters as could be produced
direct from characters as developed in them, a character which had
once disappeared could not reappear, except as it might come from
some new combination. But it is found in practice that characters
disappearing in one generation often reappear in the next or, less
numerously, in later generations. The most familiar illustration of
such reappearance in characters of poultry is the perpetually recur-
ring single comb in rose-combed varieties. Similar “ faults’ occur
frequently in other characters in all varieties of poultry, cropping
out sometimes most unexpectedly in stock in which they have been
scrupulously avoided by the breeder for many generations when
making up his matings. The biologist, observing the phenomena
of reproduction in a short series of generations, and breeding to
secure full manifestation of the laws of inheritance, deals impartially
with characters. If a character can come back, he gives it every
opportunity to do so. He considers the character recess¢ve,— tending
468 POULTRY CULTURE
to recede in the race if not interfered with; that is the natural
status of such characters. The breeder, who works as far as pos-
sible with predominant characters, considers a character which has
once disappeared and may reappear, /atent. As a rule, his only
interest in it is to prevent, as far as possible, its reappearance. The
reappearance of latent characters after a lapse of one generation
is called alternate inheritance. The reappearance of characters
after a lapse of two or more generations, but still traceable to
comparatively near ancestors, is called reversion. The appearance
of a character not belonging to the race as it exists, or to its
known ancestors, but presumed to be derived from a very remote
ancestor, is called atavism.
From the occurrence of the phenomena of alternate inheritance,
reversion, and atavism we conclude that the germ contains possibil-
ities of development of any character of any ancestor, however re-
mote ; by the regularly diminishing frequency of the occurrence of
a recessive character, as the number of generations of ancestors
free from it increases, we conclude that, once eliminated from a
single individual, a family, strain, or variety, practically free from
that character, may be produced in three or four generations.
Laws of heredity. A general law of inheritance may be based
on the rate of increase of a dominant character in a race, or on
the decreasing reappearance of a recessive character. The law as
worked out by Galton, from the investigation of inheritance in
human beings, is generally accepted by poultry breeders as a
correct expression of the general behavior of characters of poultry
in reproduction, and as showing approximately the percentage in
each generation of birds which show a selected character com-
mon to all observed ancestors, or a rejected character absent in
all observed ancestors.
Galton’s law. An individual inherits from each of its two
parents of the first generation, } of its total characters ; from each
of its four parents of the second generation, ;'; ; from each of its
eight parents of the third generation, ,'; ; from each of its sixteen
parents of the fourth generation, 54, ; from each of its thirty-two
parents of the fifth generation, ; 753, and so on.
Applied to a single character appearing in an individual but not
present in other members of the race, this means that one fourth
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 469
of the direct progeny of that individual would be likely to inherit
that character. If, then, two of the offspring possessing the char-
acter were bred together, the chances of its appearance in their
offspring would be one fourth from each parent and one sixteenth
from the grandparent. Nine in every sixteen of the second gen-
eration would inherit the character. As by constant selection the
number of ancestors which had the character is increased, and the
proportion of ancestors which did not have it is steadily reduced
and its influence rapidly diminished, only a few generations are
required to reach the stage of fixity of the character in the race
where the influence of ancestors unlike in respect to it becomes
a negligible factor.
Galton’s law is not a law or rule of practice in poultry breeding.
The attitude of the practical poultry breeder toward it should not
be misunderstood ; it cannot be said that he uses it. As a formal
statement based on scientific investigation it has been especially
serviceable to those giving instruction in the principles of breed-
ing, to prove the general rule of selection, to demonstrate the
stability and practical purity of new breeds and varieties, and to
show the need of close breeding to fix and hold desired combi-
nations of characters.
Mendel’s law. Of more importance than Galton’s statement
were the discoveries of Mendel in regard to the behavior of unlike
characters in transmission. When first published by Mendel, these
attracted no attention. Mendel’s account of his work was redis-
covered about 1900, and has since profoundly influenced the course
of investigation of the subject of heredity. Unfortunately many
scientists who took up this work with enthusiasm failed to note
some serious faults in Mendel’s treatment of his results and in his
enunciation of principles based upon them, and consequently, though
a considerable amount of this work has been done with poultry, it
has not yet yielded results of such value to poultry breeders as at
first seemed likely to follow scientific investigation in this field.
Mendel, experimenting mostly with the sweet pea, observed !
(1) that in the offspring of certain crosses a certain character of a
parent form might disappear ; (2) that when these offspring were
‘For a fuller statement of Mendel’s law see Davenport’s “ Principles of
Breeding.”
470 POULTRY CULTURE
bred together and also with the parent forms the behavior of this
latent character and of the corresponding dominant character seemed
to follow a definite law, there being approximately fixed ratios of
frequency of occurrence of such contrasted characters in each pos-
sible combination of parent forms; (3) that certain individuals in
which a latent or recessive character reappeared in this generation
were pure as to that character, while a like number presenting the
dominant character were pure as to that character, and a number
equal to these two classes combined had the dominant character
but would not certainly produce offspring having it; (4) that in
breeding from this last class there would be regularly produced the
same proportions of pure dominants, pure recessives, and individ-
uals in which the visible character did not correspond with the
germ character.
It is plain that, if this was a correct interpretation of his results,
Mendel had discovered and formulated a law of great importance
to practical breeders. But Mendel’s own interpretation of his re-
sults was faulty in these respects: (1) attributes which were prop-
erly grades of characters he regarded as ‘‘ opposite’ and ‘* mutu-
ally exclusive ” characters, and (2) he did not discriminate carefully
in the examination and description of his results. The modern dis-
ciples of Mendel have generally persisted in these errors, and are
only now beginning to avoid them and to present their results so that
practical breeders will give them serious attention. Furthermore,
in nearly all Mendelian discussion it has been assumed that Men-
del’s law related especially to cross-breeding, and that its principal
practical application would be to the making of new breeds and
varieties, while poultry breeders as a class are most interested in
perfecting established races, and discourage the multiplication of
varieties. To be of direct use to the mass of poultry breeders the
facts of Mendelism must be demonstrated with pure-bred poultry
and the laws stated for direct application in the breeding of pure
races. In all the confusion on this subject it seems clear that the
behavior of characters in transmission is less eccentric than has
been supposed, and that it may be possible to devise systems of
breeding and of record keeping which will enable breeders to
identify those individuals which breed true as to desired char-
acters, and to eliminate more certainly and rapidly from their flocks
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 47I
those specimens in whose progeny undesirable latent characters
would appear. Incidentally, the methods of studying breeding
problems which Mendelism has introduced are likely to lead to
important discoveries in relation to other phenomena of breeding.
Correlation of characters. If we have, to begin with, such an
individual as we desire, and the work is not obstructed by failure
of the individual of the desired type to breed, or by adverse pre-
potency of individuals mated with it, it is easy to fix or to eliminate
any single character, and this can be done in a very few genera-
tions; but in breeding to fix, maintain, or produce a type, it is
necessary to consider many characters at the same time. If each
character, in its various expressions, were absolutely independent
of every other character, the making and maintaining of types ap-
proximating fixed standards would be a hopeless task. The char-
acters of an individual, being parts of an organism, are often
necessarily similar in certain manifestations, either throughout or in
closely related groups. The welfare of the individual depends to
a great extent upon the adaptation of its parts to each other and
to its conditions and mode of life. So there are established, in any
race or family bred on any principle of selection, certain apparent
correlations of parts occurring so regularly that, when considered
only where they occur, they appear to indicate an essential unity,
making the group of characters act as one. Thus, the body, legs,
neck, and head of a bird have as a rule a similarity (differing
outlines considered) of proportions ; a bird with long body is likely
to have a long neck, head, and legs ; a bird with very short, strong
bill and broad skull is likely to be short and heavily built throughout.
That these correlations are not essential is seen when we find in
such a variety as the Exhibition Game fowl an increase in length of
neck and legs quite out of proportion to the increase in length of
body, and in creeper varieties the size (including length) of body
maintained, while the length of neck is slightly, and the length of
legs greatly, reduced. Again there is a natural, general tendency to
correlation in structural character of bones, muscles, and skin. If
size and muscle are developed, making a large, heavy body, the
tendency is to coarseness throughout, — coarse bone, coarse-fibered
flesh, and coarse, thick skin. But on examination of a number of
birds of this general type it will be found that there is not close
472 POULTRY CULTURE
correlation, while when fowls of different types and breeding but of
like weights are compared, great differences are found in weight
of bone and in texture of flesh and skin. In short, while the tend-
ency to correlation which constitutes physical symmetry is marked,
the fact that it is variable and easily broken up indicates that such
characters are not necessarily correlated.
Correlation of external characters with constitution and function.
A distinction must be made between the normal state of a character
and transient, abnormal expressions of it. To one observant of the
attitudes and actions of animals and birds under a variety of circum-
stances, the general attitude and carriage of body and limbs, the
movements, the expression of the eye, etc. indicate immediately
whether the creature is in normal health or not, and in a healthy
creature afford means of estimating its vitality. There is plainly a
correlation in such things, but not of the kind under consideration.
It is merely the expression of the general condition of the creature.
By correlation of external and internal characters:is meant such par-
ticular relation between a certain external, plainly visible character
and a certain functional character, or a certain quality which cannot
be determined by ordinary inspection of the creature in life, that the
external character serves as an index of the value of the other.
The most familiar cases of supposed correlation of external and
internal characters in poultry relate to the laying capacity in fowls.
The size of the comb has long been popularly considered a reliable
index of relative laying capacity. To a less extent popularly, but
more widely among poultrymen, a certain shape of body is regarded
as the egg type, invariably found in great layers. Like all fal-
lacies, these have a slight foundation in fact. That the condition
of the comb of a hen varies according to the activity or inactivity
of the reproductive organs is so evident that no one who has the
care of fowls can fail to see it. Normally the comb of a hen is
larger when she is laying than when she is not, and brighter in
color ;! the comb of a pullet does not develop until she is about
to lay; the growth of the comb of a cockerel corresponds with the
1 The fully developed, bright-red comb is not an infallible sign that the hen
is laying. Many hens with diseased ovaries, and some that never lay, have
well-developed combs. In a healthy hen, however, there is regularly a difference
in the appearance of the comb when she is laying and when she is not.
PHENOMENA AND PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 473
development of the reproductive organs. When a hen is not lay-
ing, the comb becomes smaller and loses its bright-red color. Ifa
sufficient number of cases is considered, a comparison of egg pro-
duction of hens with large and hens with small combs will always
show that the size of the comb is not correlated with laying capac-
ity. Neither as between varieties or breeds, nor between individuals
in a variety, does the size of the comb indicate laying capacity.
Many uncommonly good producers have very small combs.
The shape of the comb and the size and shape of the wattles
sometimes appear to be correlated with reproductive capacity in
both cocks and hens. Many instances are noted of fowls with
poorly developed combs and wattles that are lacking in vitality.
Males of this kind are often marked as poor breeders. In these
cases the failure to develop is not peculiar to the comb and wattles.
The body is not well developed, and in the males the lack of
development of the male plumage is noticeable.
The alleged egg type in hens is a long-bodied bird, appearing
wedge-shaped, with the broad part of the wedge at her rear
when she is viewed either in profile or from above. The type de-
scription is borrowed from the favorite description of the dairy
type of cow. It applies with varying accuracy to most hens when
laying heavily, but the records of experiment stations which have
investigated this point confirm the view of careful observers among
poultrymen that there is no correlation between shape of body and
laying capacity.
Quite a long list might be made of supposed correlations of
external features with internal characters or qualities. A few will
show the general character of all. White birds of all kinds are
popularly considered weaker in constitution than others, but not
the slightest foundation for the idea can be found in a general
comparison. A red eye is considered by many as an indication
of reproductive vigor, but, except as heightened color of the eye
gives a brighter, bolder, expression and reflects good physical con-
dition, it would be hard to show foundation for the idea. People
who prefer a special color of skin often aver that there is a corre-
lation between color of skin and quality and flavor of flesh. Some
justification for this view may be found in the fact that the meat
types of western Europe, with white or gray skin, are of better
474 POULTRY CULTURE
average table quality than the fowls of America, where yellow-
skinned poultry is generally preferred. It is not the color of the
skin, but selection for quality, that makes the difference. The
European breeders give careful attention to meat quality; in
America very little attention has been given to the development
of fine quality in table fowls.
Tradition, prejudice, and superficial observation are the princi-
pal sources of ideas of correlation of external and internal charac-
ters in poultry. In a general way the development and condition
of external characters indicate the development and condition of
all characters. Correlation of development is general rather than
special. The substantial characters of a species are necessarily
closely correlated. In a state of nature the superficial characters
are also closely correlated, but in domestication natural groups
may be broken up and new combinations formed, and after a few
generations the combination as a whole tends to reproduce with
only slight modifications.
CHAPTER XXVI
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF POULTRY BREEDING
The work of the breeder consists in intelligent direction of the
natural laws of reproduction for certain definite purposes. His
object is not (as is so often erroneously supposed) to secure the
perpetuation of natural types, or of the types of domestic live stock
which would develop under any given conditions if he did not
interfere. If such were his objects, all that would be necessary
would be to destroy individuals presenting marked variations from
the common type and to allow others to mate according to chance
and inclination. The breeder’s part in the development of domes-
tic races is to bring order out of the chaos of variation called
mongrelism. From a practically unlimited stock of types he selects
the few found most serviceable, or which seem to him most beau-
tiful, fixes these types and tries to persuade others to use and
preserve them. What nature would do in any particular case
interests him either not at all or only as it gives him an insight
into the properties of the living matter with which he works.
While the standards to which he breeds are practically fixed, in
successful individual work in breeding the results are always pro-
gressive. If the first independent efforts of a breeder show im-
provement in good stock, that is usually due to chance and is
likely to be lost in the next trial. It is when the poultry breeder
finds, year after year, better quality in his good birds and a larger
proportion of birds of high quality, that he knows that he is
applying principles correctly.
While it is not to be expected that the independent work of a
novice in breeding stock of any type will give at first a high grade
of results, there is no need of the rapid regression from type, and
deterioration of quality, usually shown in the work of the novice
beginning with good poultry. With very rare exceptions novices
in poyltry breeding begin their work with two wrong ideas firmly
fixed in their minds. They suppose that absolute purity of blood
475
476 POULTRY CULTURE
gives uniformity in results, and that the great evil they have to
guard against in breeding is loss of vitality and of “ practical quali-
ties ’ through breeding from birds near akin.
The history of the development of races shows very plainly that
the development and preservation of artificial types depends upon
systematic, continuous selection. The fact that self-division is the
first form of reproduction, and that self-fertilization is the law in
both the vegetable and the animal kingdom until a high stage of
development through variation is reached and sex becomes neces-
sary as a check on variation, shows that inbreeding is not in itself
detrimental. The breeder who accepts these two facts at the be-
ginning of his work is in a position with reference to it which no
one who fails to apprehend them ever reaches. It would be hard
to find a successful poultry breeder who did not date the beginning
of his success from the time when he came to appreciate the fact
that any breed or variety in his hands became what he made it, and
that outbreeding tended always to disintegration of well-established
types. The effective use of principles of breeding as deduced from
phenomena of reproduction depends on the application of principles
without prejudice.
Adaptability of poultry breeding. In poultry breeding, and
particularly in the breeding of fowls, we find the one line of animal
breeding open to every one who has the use of a little land. The
ordinary farmer cannot be an independent breeder of horses or
cattle ; the number of animals he can produce and mature on his
farm is not large enough to give him either the necessary experi-
ence or a proper selection of breeding stock. With sheep and hogs
the ordinary farmer may, if he is so inclined, do something in the
way of special breeding. With poultry the resident on a village
lot may do in a few years more actual work in breeding than most
growers of other domestic live stock can do in a lifetime. The rela-
tively small individual value of ordinarily good breeders, and the
rapid rate of increase in poultry, make it possible for a breeder to
secure a few good individuals by a very small investment, and to
build up a large stock in a short time.
Length of life and breeding value. The short life of most
kinds of poultry is a disadvantage to the breeder, in that the full
measure of the breeding value of an individual may not be found
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 477
until its usefulness as a breeder is nearly over. The value of a
stallion or a mare, or of a bull or a cow, as a breeder may be demon-
strated long before the animal has reached its prime. Then many
years of life remain in which the breeder may use a few selected
individuals year after year. But except in the larger and less pro-
ductive kinds of poultry, the breeder must make a large proportion
of new matings every year. The numbers produced by even large
stock breeders are less than those produced by the average small
poultry breeder. The poultry breeder usually has an abundance of
material. for selection, and if he attends to it year by year, may
make much more rapid progress in any desired direction than the
breeder of cattle and horses. On the other hand, inattention to
selection of breeders for a year is almost certain to put him back
two or three years, while two or three years’ relaxation of vigilance
in efforts to maintain or develop a type will usually make it neces-
sary for him to begin all over again. A breeder of horses or cattle
might neglect special attention to breeding for several years, and
yet, if he retained a part of his stock, take the work up again about
where he left it, and with the same individuals. In a like period
of time a neglected stock of fowls or ducks would include a very
small proportion of individuals of known breeding. The breeder
of poultry has to give practically constant attention to the selection
of breeders.
Relative value of male and female. If in polygamous crea-
tures the females produce normally but one or two young at a birth
and breed but once a year, the apparent breeding value of a male,
bred to any given number of females, is equal to that of all the
females, for he has a one-half influence on the progeny of all, while
the hereditary influence of each female is limited to her own prog-
eny. Then whatever of peculiar merit an individual in any gener-
ation may take from its dam is limited to that individual. Its sire
and dam may reproduce its like, one or a few each year. When
it arrives at maturity, it may reproduce its special merit in its off-
spring, —if a male it may reproduce its type in a considerable
number ; if a female, in a very limited number each year. Under
such conditions a male of great individual merit or prepotency is
much more valuable than a female. As the number of young pro-
duced by the female increases, her practical value in reproduction
478 POULTRY CULTURE
of type as compared with that of the male increases ; for while the
male may still influence a very much larger number of offspring,
the female may produce enough offspring in a season to enable a
breeder to produce in the next season hundreds or even thousands
of young from matings of her offspring. As between a male and
female of equal breeding value, polygamous mating constitutes a
handicap of one generation on the female. This, where a genera-
tion matures in less than a year, is a very slight difference. An
experienced and skillful poultry breeder places as high a value
on the female in his breeding operations as on the male, though
commercially the male is more valuable because a purchaser may
realize more quickly on his investment.
Selection. In nature the established type of a species or a variety
is the type that is best adapted to its environment. Such types
develop as a result of zatural selection, defined by Darwin as “ the
survival of the fittest.” In improved domestic races types are arbi-
trarily determined by man in accordance with his needs or his
tastes, and are secured and maintained by allowing only individuals
of the desired types to propagate their kind. Such types are called
artificial types (breeds) and the system of selection by which they
are made and preserved is called artificial selection.
Superficially, artificial and natural selection often seem to pro-
ceed on radically different principles, and so are by many regarded
as essentially antagonistic. The impression is very general that
artificial selection is zzatezral, — at variance with nature. This is
true only when by artificial selection the development or suppres-
sion of a character is carried to the point where the result becomes
detrimental to the race. In domestication natural selection becomes
in a measure inoperative, and the natural type varies and multi-
plies indefinitely. Artificial, or intelligent, selection then becomes
necessary for the isolation and development of a limited number
of the types arising. In the wild state conditions make it impos-
sible for many special types of a species to develop in the same
territory. In domestication, man may develop, by the control and
separation of individuals, as many types as he wishes. As long as
selection does not unduly disturb the natural equilibrium of char-
acters, artificial selection is not unnatural; and in so far as, with-
out injury to others, it develops special characters beyond what
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 479
is possible under natural conditions, it is better than natural
selection. The difference between the common type of a wild
race and the finest type of the same race in domestication is a
measure of the difference, in its value to man, of natural and
artificial selection.
Poultry standards. The continuance and distribution of a
specific type or variety in domestication depend upon the agree-
ment of breeders on a standard for that type. In the development
of a breed or variety in any locality an unwritten standard is gradu-
ally evolved, and the breeders are loosely governed by that standard.
When a variety is widely distributed and competitive exhibitions
bring together stock from many localities, a written standard be-
comes necessary. Unwritten standards, as a rule, relate only to the
most conspicuous features of a type, and allow great variation in
details. Written standards undertake to establish size and weight
and to describe every visible character. They are usually mere
outlines, and often seem vague to those not familiar with the varie-
ties described and with the popular types. Even when descriptions
are supplemented by pictorial illustrations, a written standard is
quite inadequate as a description of a variety. In studying a stand-
ard the novice must use as illustrations live birds of known values
as commonly measured by that standard. The standard of a breed
or variety describes the assumed perfect type of every character of
that variety. Such a standard is ideal, in that the model form of
each and every character is not often found in any one bird! The
ordinary view of standards makes such a standard (in theory) the
ideal toward which all breeders are striving. Actually, considering
the relations of a standard to its variety at different periods of the
history of the variety, and the inevitable differences in interpretation
of its provisions, a written standard only indicates general direc-
tions and bounds, and the exact type in style at any time can be
learned only by observation of the type that wins most prizes at
leading shows.
The term “standard” is technically (but not discriminatingly)
used in this country with specific reference to varieties described in
1 The technical fiction is that the perfect bird cannot be produced. While the
proportion to the whole number is small, many birds are produced which only
hypercritical judgment can find fault with.
480 POULTRY CULTURE
the ‘American Standard of Perfection’’! published by the Ameri-
can Poultry Association. Stock bred for any definite purpose or to
fix or maintain any character or combination of characters is, prop-
erly speaking, standard bred. The Standard of Perfection is a hand-
book for judges and exhibitors rather than a complete guide for
breeders ; for, although the breeder's object is to produce birds of
the descriptions the Standard calls for, in all varieties many birds
of great value as breeders are found which the Standard disqualifies
for exhibition, while in every variety in which double matings are
used the exhibition type is regularly produced from matings of Stand-
ard birds of one sex with non-Standard birds of the opposite sex.
Relative value of characters in selection. When fowls are
bred for eggs, without special attention to increase of egg produc-
tion, there are only two essential points to be considered, —vztalzty
(vigor, good constitution, and development) and szze, and in respect
to the latter point, all that is necessary is that the fowls shall be
large enough to lay eggs of the average size that the market de-
mands. All other points may be disregarded. In breeding for the
table, shape also must be considered, making vitality, size, and shape
the essential points. In breeding for exhibition, carriage, color,
comb, crest, and other superficial features become of importance.
In applying standards in accordance with the original and rational
intent of the written standard, superficial characters are not given
valuations which make it possible for a bird inferior in substantial
characters to win by superiority in superficial characters, and espe-
cially not by exaggeration of valuation of a single character. The
common effect of the use of written, accurate standards is to bring
a variety quickly to a high state of development in superficial char-
acters. After this stage has been reached and the birds (with the
usual slight individual variations) are actually of very uniform
quality (on a fair interpretation of the terms describing the various
1 In a general way the practice of the American Poultry Association has been
to give recognition to breeds or varieties at an advanced stage of develop-
ment whenever a considerable number of persons showed interest in the matter,
but it has frequently happened that breeds that were quite popular were refused
recognition, while others in which few were interested have been admitted.
Recognition in the Standard of Perfection usually implies that considerable
progress has been made in fixing the type. The fact that a breed or variety is
not in the Standard tells nothing as to its quality.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 481
sections), the tendency is to make the decision of relative merits
turn on a few special features, to overvalue such features, and so,
by corresponding undervaluation of other features, to develop a
few favored characters at the expense of the rest. Many illustra-
tions of this kind might be given. There is hardly a variety in
the Standard that has not at some time suffered through such
partiality for some character. The most marked cases are those in
which the variety has lost popularity through the development of
a feature which finally became detrimental; but the evil is by no
means confined to such. The craze for dead-white plumage for a
time made the white varieties conspicuous for lack of shape and
vitality. The craze for barring ‘to the skin” leads breeders of
Barred Plymouth Rocks to some neglect of shape and size. In
Leghorns and Polish the head points have been rated as high
as thirty per cent of the value of the specimen, with the result, in
case of the Leghorn, of so reducing size and neglecting shape of
body that the breed seemed at one time in danger of losing stand-
ing with the public. In breeding birds for exhibition the breeder
is forced to follow prevailing fads. Doing so does not necessarily
compel neglect of other characters, but as the fad develops it be-
comes more and more difficult to find and produce specimens
good in the favored section and also in other sections.
Systems of selection. In selecting his breeding stock a poultry
breeder uses two principles, or systems, of selection, applying some-
times one, sometimes the other; thus the common method of
selection is by irregular alternation of these systems. Selection by
a complex standard may be (1) progressive (or particular), consid-
ering certain characters or groups of characters always in the same
order, and rejecting from subsequent consideration all individuals
failing to meet requirements at any stage of selection, and (2) sész/-
taneous (or collective), in which an effort is made to consider all
the more important characters collectively, balancing faults in some
against merits in others. It is not practicable to apply the progressive
principle to a great many characters, one by one. By a division of
characters into natural groups, with separate consideration of each
group and of the principal characters, and collective consideration
of all but the more important characters in a group, a simple and
effective working system of selection is developed.
482 POULTRY CULTURE
Division of characters for this purpose gives three classes, which
may be designated as (1) essential, (2) substantial, and (3) superficial.
Essential characters. Whatever the purpose for which poultry
are bred, they should have (a) good constitution, (4) size appropriate
to minimum requirements, and (c) individual symmetry. Lacking
constitutional vigor, a bird is not likely to produce offspring equal to
itself in other respects. The difference may not be perceptible in
comparing consecutive generations, but a comparison of stock bred
for several generations with care to preserve vitality, and stock in
which this point has been neglected for a similar period, rarely fails
to show marked deterioration in the latter. Constitution not only
affects the quality of other characters but the numbers produced,
the losses of stock, and so (indirectly) the methods of practice. In
size the birds selected as breeders must always be large enough to
produce offspring that will meet the ordinary requirements of the
purpose for which the stock is bred. Stock bred for egg production
must be large enough to lay eggs marketable at prices for average
receipts ; stock bred for market must be large enough to produce
poultry that will meet at least the minimum ordinary demand. So
with stock bred to sell for breeding or laying purposes, —if the
stock is vigorous and has the size required for the ordinary produc-
tion of eggs and market poultry, it is salable, though deficient in
many other respects ; but if it lacks constitution and ordinary size,
it cannot, as a rule, be profitably grown for any purpose. Individual
symmetry means a symmetrical development of the individual with-
out regard to any particular standard ; there may be symmetry of
parts without correspondence with any special established type.
Individual symmetry implies absence of deformity.
Substantial characters. Size as related to special uses or stand-
ards, and distinctive shape and color, are substantial characters. If
a particular size of market poultry is to be produced, the birds used
for breeders must be of appropriate size. In breeding birds, of any
established race, to be sold for exhibition or breeding purposes, the
breeders selected must closely approximate the standards of weight
for their breed or variety. They should also have the distinctive
shape and symmetry of the breed or variety, both as to body and as
to the general size and shape of other parts in which characters are
distinctive. Color, too, is a substantial character in so far as it may
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 483
have an influence on profits with poultry of no particular color type,
or may qualify a specimen as of some particular color type. In
breeding for market the breeder, as a rule, avoids black and dark-
colored birds, especially if they are to be dressed and sold before
maturity. In breeding to color standards (even without close atten-
tion to the finer points of color) a line must be drawn between color
faults which may be tolerated and those which ought to condemn
a bird for breeding purposes. :
Superficial characters. The fine points of color and of shape,
particularly of shape as not affecting any useful quality, are su-
perficial characters. It is the superficial points which make the
differences between those individual specimens of a race that are
worth consideration for exhibition or breeding purposes, — which
give to the specimen fizzsh and proportionately increasing money
value, provided these superficial characters are found with the de-
sired essential and substantial characters. Remarkable finish in
color or in some other conspicuous feature is often found on birds
of poor shape, or distinctly inferior in size, or lacking in constitu-
tion. Such birds are not usually salable at high prices, but the
breeder is strongly tempted to use them, in the hope of getting a
proportion of offspring with their excellence and without their faults.
An experienced breeder who knows his stock thoroughly, who re-
lies on other matings for most of his stock, and who uses such birds
only in special matings may sometimes succeed in doing this. A
novice rarely gets the desired results, and if (as is too often the
case) the use of such a bird for breeding affects a large part of the
produce of a season, he may lose more than he could possibly gain
if the bird bred up to his expectations; for a bird of this kind
rarely impresses its good quality on any considerable proportion of
its offspring.
Progressive selection, with the elimination, at each step, of all
individuals which fail in the requirements under consideration, pre-
vents the development of stocks strong in some fancy points but
lacking in essential and substantial characters. The more rigid the
selection, the smaller becomes the number of birds that will pass it.
As a matter of business policy the breeder must so regulate his
selection of available stock that he can make the most profitable
use of it as a whole, but to establish himself firmly as a breeder
484 POULTRY CULTURE
he must make the best possible use of the relatively small pro-
portion of each year’s produce in which he finds combined a high
degree of excellence in many characters.
Collective selection and compensation in breeding. Progressive
selection can apply in practice to only a few of the more important
characters. It is in effect selection for the elimination of faults
which the breeder regards as intolerable. When birds with such
faults have been eliminated, what remain will always show consider-
able variation, and this will be most marked in superficial char-
acters. Continued careful breeding reduces differences, but since at
the same time it develops the breeder’s critical faculty and his
ability to distinguish slight differences, the proportion of what he
considers good breeders in his stock may not be materially changed.
There is usually a tendency, partly in the stock and partly in the
breeder’s selection, to develop a stock in the direction of its
strongest points. The most effective checks on this are the written
standard, competition, and the difficulty of selling specimens which
are decidedly weak in any superficial character.
Having eliminated the most unlike individuals by progressive
selection, the breeder proceeds to make appropriate matings of
those he has reserved by collective consideration not simply of the
points of the individual but of the points of a pair, male and female.
His object is to secure in the sexes, as far as possible, likeness
to the type to be produced (sexual differences of color, etc. duly
considered), and when the bird of one sex varies from the typical in
any character, to secure in the other sex the opposite variation in
that character, nearly all variations in well-bred birds being slight
when compared with variations in specimens from parents markedly
unlike. This balancing of opposite tendencies in variation is of
little use, as a rule, when the characters considered represent wide
variations, for the result of the union of such characters is likely to
give many intermediate grades of blending of characters and only
a very few of any desired grade. The mating of individuals differ-
ing widely in any character is good practice only when the desired
character cannot be secured by breeding together like individuals.
The object of the compensation method in mating is not to enable
the breeder to use for breeding purposes as large a proportion of
his stock as possible, but to enable him to equalize the tendencies
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 485
to variation in the individuals nearest the type. A skilled breeder
never uses, in his regular matings of an established variety, birds
varying conspicuously from the type which produces the standard
type. Experience shows that, when the object is to produce uni-
formity of type and high average merit, the most reliable breeders
are those individuals with the fewest faults. The “ good all-round
bird” is almost invariably more valuable as a breeder than the
bird conspicuous for special excellence of one character or a few
characters.
Inbreeding and line breeding. Inbreeding refers to matings of
individuals that are near akin. Line breeding is applied to various
plans designed to conserve blood and race character without in-
breeding. Theoretically, plans of breeding may be, and have been,
worked out which would give the breeder, for use at frequent inter-
vals, individuals bred in the same way from the same origin, — the
same blood separated by several generations. Possibly the specifi-
cations could be carried out in practice, but the work is too com-
plicated and the results are too uncertain, and experience in close
breeding soon shows the breeder that it is not necessary to resort
to such methods to avoid inbreeding.
The most common form of line breeding is to maintain a male
line intact, though occasional or even regular changes are made in
the female line. Such line breeding gives better results than when
breeding lines are crossed and recrossed irregularly. If the head
of the line was an exceptional bird, and his male descendants used
for breeding in each generation resemble him very closely, the
type cannot fail to be strongly impressed on the stock, though
females of somewhat different breeding are occasionally used. In
most cases, when results of line breeding are conspicuously and
regularly good, the breeder practices close breeding to a much
greater extent than he thinks it wise to admit to a public with a
prejudice against it.
Close breeding. The term ‘close breeding ’”’ describes the prac-
tice of the best poultry breeders more comprehensively than the
more familiar terms “line breeding” and “ inbreeding.’”’ Close
breeding is necessary to secure such likeness in parents that
similar uniformity may be produced in their offspring. Since an
individual inherits, on the average, only one half of its characters
486 POULTRY CULTURE
from its immediate parents, 6.25 per cent from each of four grand-
parents, 1.50 per cent from each of eight great-grandparents, and
.39 per cent from each of sixteen great-great-grandparents, it is
plain that if a breeder undertakes (as most breeders do at the out-
set) to avoid consanguineous matings, he will always have in the
ancestry of each generation of stock so many chances for reversion
and recombinations of latent characters that his stock will never
reach a high grade of excellence in many qualities.
In selecting like parents for any generation the breeder usually
finds that the birds most like in appearance (and generally in per-
formance as well) are of near kin, — that is, they are like in ances-
try as well as in appearance. The advantage of mating like birds
of like ancestry is so plain, and has been demonstrated so often in
practice, that it is universally recognized. But there is a popular
belief that close breeding (in-and-in-breeding), while of advantage
to the fancier, is almost immediately destructive of vitality and of
practical qualities, and quickly leads to sterility. This fallacy is
less prevalent than it has been, and would soon disappear from
among poultrymen if breeders did not, as a matter of policy, say
as little as possible about this part of their breeding practice.}
The rule of good practice. Mate the best ( for the object in view)
individuals available, disregarding relationship, is the general
practice of skillful breeders. It makes close breeding the usual
practice, and at the same time leads to the introduction of new
blood in small flocks every few generations, and in large stocks at
less frequent intervals. As long as a breeder’s matings within the
blood lines of his own stock are giving him such breeding birds as
he wants, there is no object in his going outside for new blood,
but when he finds another breeder producing birds better than his
1 The poultry breeder’s ordinary and low-priced stock is bought mostly by
novices who insist on having stock not akin. A large breeder making many mat-
ings can furnish birds mated for breeding that are not near kin. The purchaser
would usually get good results from a mating of this kind. But in a great many
cases, so fearful is he of the dangers of inbreeding, and so distrustful of the breeder,
that he buys from two different breeders at the same time and changes the males,
or if he has some stock of his own, mates some of his females to the male pur-
chased and one of his males to the females. An expert breeder who knew all the
stock might do this with a specific object and get the results sought, but one who
has no reason for a mating except to avoid inbreeding seldom gets good results
from such changes.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 487
in any respect, unless he can make the same improvement in his
own stock, he must have some of that breeder’s stock. Usually he
buys stock as the easiest and surest way to get what he wants. A
breeder who is working on a large scale, making ten, fifteen, twenty,
or more matings of a single variety every season, can, with a little
care, avoid mating birds of near kin, yet keep within the same
general blood lines. Such breeders, as a rule, consider the point
of relationship only as it may affect the behavior of characters in
transmission. Without exception these breeders are ready buyers
of birds that they think may prove useful in their breeding. The
small breeder, unless he has stock of high quality, and breeds very
closely, is forced to go outside often, not for new blood but for
better quality.
The danger of introducing new blood. In any well-bred stock
the danger of deterioration through the introduction of new blood.
is very much more real than any danger of deterioration through
lack of new blood in stock bred with due attention to essential and
substantial characters. While the point is not one easily demon-
strated, there is reason to suppose that a mingling of blood lines
long separated tends to bring out latent ancestral characters
(more especially, the most troublesome faults of a variety). Hence,
before making extensive use of a bird of different stock or of un-
known breeding, an experienced breeder tries it in special matings,
to find out how it will “nick” with his stock. A breeder may try
a bird in this way a number of times with different mates without
getting the results he wants. Small breeders, even after a good
deal of experience, are too prone to take chances on a new bird
that has taken their fancy in their general matings, often with
the result that faults requiring years of careful breeding to elimi-
nate crop out all through the progeny. The experienced breeder
never relies on a new bird until he has tested it, and never lets
a bird of proved breeding value go unless he has a better one for
its place.
Age and breeding quality. In those kinds of poultry which get
their full growth within a year, it is commonly observed that the
birds, if matured by the beginning of the breeding season, are more
reliable breeders the first season than afterwards, producing more
young, though the quality may be somewhat inferior to what the
488 POULTRY CULTURE
same birds produce in their second and third breeding seasons. In
the larger kinds, as geese and turkeys, the yearling males in par-
ticular lack development and the two- and three-year-old males are
usually in every way much better breeders. With regard to fowls
and ducks — especially the former — many instances of great
breeding vigor after the first year show that the common failure
is due to conditions and management. Males are overworked dur-
ing the breeding season and not given proper care after it. While
old cocks are usually much less fertile in winter than cockerels,
if in equally good condition they are as serviceable when spring
approaches and will get larger and more uniform chickens. In
general this is true also as to pullets and hens. It is largely a
question of condition. The older the bird grows, the more diffi-
cult it is to keep it in good breeding condition. Few fowls and
ducks are as good breeders the third year as the second, fewer
still are good after the third year; yet occasionally four- and five-
year-old birds of both sexes will breed as well and the hens lay
as well as young stock, and there are authentic instances of fowls
breeding well at seven and eight years of age.
Ratio of females to males. In ordinary breeding, with quantity
the first consideration, it is usual to make the mating ratio as wide
as possible, mating with each male the largest number of females
that can be kept with him and a satisfactory percentage of fertile
eggs secured. This number varies greatly for individuals of the
same variety, and also in averages for males of different classes of
fowls and of different kinds of poultry. In fowls it varies notably,
also, with conditions of mating. When one male is penned for the
season with the same lot of females, the usual practice is to mate
with a male of the small breeds, from ten to fifteen hens; with a
male of the medium-sized breeds, from eight to twelve hens ; with a
male of the largest breeds, from six to ten hens. These are about
the numbers used by fanciers and breeders who select and breed
closely for general matings. In special matings the breeder mates
with each male such females as closely match, in appearance and
breeding, the one selected as the best mate for that male. In mating
as carefully as this a breeder rarely finds more than three or four
females for a pen, and frequently finds only one. To get full serv-
ice from the male in such cases, he may either alternate him in
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 489
two small matings (the second of which is made up of females
judged less desirable as mates for him but likely to produce some
good birds) or mate him with females of several slightly different
types and keep the eggs separate by trap-nesting the hens. When
it is inconvenient to keep hens in as small flocks as ten or fifteen,
many poultry keepers keep from twenty-five to thirty-five hens in a
flock and use two males, alternating them at regular intervals.
When hens in large flocks are used to produce eggs for hatch-
ing, the proportion of males used is much smaller than for separate
matings. With medium-sized fowls six males to one hundred
females is generally considered sufficient. Good results have been
reported from flocks of Asiatics with the same proportion of
males. With large flocks of Leghorns the same proportion is used
by many breeders, but others use a smaller proportion of males,
some as low as three to one hundred hens.}
In ducks the usual mating ratio is one male to five females until
warm weather (May or June); after that, one male to eight or ten
females. As the males are not quarrelsome, and interfere with each
other very little, breeding flocks may be of any desired number.
Average flocks contain from thirty to forty breeders. In turkeys one
male is mated with any number of females up to fifteen or twenty,
the usual number being ten or twelve. All other kinds of poultry
either pair or mate in small families.
Period of fertility. Fertile eggs are often obtained, on the sec-
ond day after the introduction of a male, from hens previously
kept in celibacy, but usually fertility from a new mating is low for
a week or two, especially in cold weather. Experiments have shown
that hens may continue to lay fertile eggs for nearly three weeks
after separation from the male, and that the fertility is likely to be
as good for a week or ten days after the removal of a male as it
was while he was present. In turkeys the influence of an impreg-
nation is said to continue for a very much longer period, but this
view seems to rest on a small number of instances not very well
authenticated. Accurate observation is difficult, and the roving
1] cannot say positively that fertility runs better in the large flocks with the
wider mating ratio, but reports from breeders indicate to me that it does. The fact
of the very regular difference in mating ratio for separate matings and miscella-
neous matings indicates more efficient service of the males under such conditions.
490 POULTRY CULTURE
habit of the turkey makes it quite possible for females and males
from different flocks to mate without the knowledge of the keeper.
There is no authentic instance of the influence of impregnation con-
tinuing as long as three weeks in fowls. When birds of different
varieties that have been running together are separated and mated
each with its own kind, no effects of previous matings are likely to
appear after a week or ten days.1 The usual rule is not to use the
eggs for hatching until two weeks after separation.
Regulation of sex. It would be a decided advantage to many
poultry keepers to be able to control sex, but there is no known
method of either controlling or influencing the proportions of the
sexes. Usually they are produced in nearly equal numbers, even
in small broods. Occasionally one sex will greatly predominate in
a brood, in a small stock, or in the offspring of a particular mating.
Current reports sometimes indicate a general preponderance of
one sex in a particular season, in which case every one with a theory
on the control of sex can easily find instances which seem to con-
firm it. When the preponderance of one sex is quite general, it
suggests that some general condition may influence sex. If so, any
general control of sex by the breeder is plainly impossible. On such
scant and crude observations as have been made on this point, the
only instances of regularity in predominance of numbers of one
sex are found in particular matings or in individual birds.2 In
none of these cases did the tendency to produce one sex appear
to be transmitted. It is possible that the occurrence of a large excess
of one sex was purely accidental.
1It does not seem to me necessary to say more on the subjects of contamina-
tion and telegony than is said above, except to add that in a considerable experi-
ence with different kinds of poultry I have never seen a trace of contamination
from eggs set two weeks after separation from a male of another variety, and that,
although ever since 1897 I have made it a point to take up every case of mental
impression reported to me, in not a single instance has a person reporting such
cases been willing to answer questions or to have the case investigated.
2 The most remarkable cases I have known or heard of were the following: Inthe
early nineties I had a Houdan male that for two seasons mated in four different mat-
ings, — once with Houdan hens, once with Light Brahmas, once with Barred Plym-
outh Rocks, and once with Brown Leghorns, — produced regularly about five pullets
in every six chickens. Mr. A. C. Smith informed me that the celebrated Barred
Plymouth Rock male Rally produced the sexes regularly in about the same ratio,
five females in six chicks,—a quality in his case decidedly objectionable, the
daughters of an Exhibition Barred Rock male being useful only for breeding.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 49gI
Mating systems. Whenever Standard specimens of both sexes
can be produced regularly from a mating of a Standard male
and a Standard female, the practice is to mate in that way. This
is called the single-mating system. When the Standard require-
ments for males and females of a variety are such that the desired
type of male and female cannot be regularly produced from a mat-
ing of a Standard male and female, two distinct lines, or sub-
varieties, are developed, one to produce Standard males and one
to produce Standard females. This is called the double-mating
system. Whether or not the necessity for double matings shows
inconsistency in the Standard depends upon the points of view.
From the practical poultryman’s point of view it does; from the
fancier’s point of view it does not. The occasion for double mat-
ings arises principally because of sexual differences in plumage
color, which the fancier in some cases would intensify and in others
would remove. In either case he can produce what he considers
the finest type in one sex only at the sacrifice of his favorite color
in the other. The particular reasons for special mating will appear
in the discussions of matings of such varieties as the Barred Plym-
outh Rock and the Brown Leghorn. Here it need only be said,
with reference to the general question of the system to be used,
that in all varieties for which the double-mating system is com-
monly used, a breeder who adopts the single-mating system cannot
compete, in the production of high-quality stock, with those who
use the other system. J/utermediate matings (so called) are some-
times used, in which a male about medium between the two types
of males used in the distinct lines is mated with females of both
types. That method may give satisfaction when a breeder works
only for his own pleasure, or when competition is not too strong.
DETAILS oF MatTINnGs
In general a character common to a number of breeds or varieties behaves
the same way wherever found. Its behavior sometimes varies because of differ-
ent ancestral influences, but on the whole the rules for mating which apply
to a character or a combination of characters in one variety will apply to all
similar characters and combinations. Hence, in a general consideration of de-
tails of mating poultry the subject may be greatly simplified by considering
similar types in groups. The special details of mating are principally color
details. In consideration of shape points the application of the rule requires
492 POULTRY CULTURE
only knowledge of the type to be produced; in substantial points of shape
like closely produces like.” But in color and some superficial points sex
differences and tendencies must be considered. In poultry other than fowls the
color varieties are few. In fowls the duplication of color types (varieties) in
breeds (shape varieties) is so general that discussion of color matings can be
reduced to a few heads. In the treatment of details fowls will be considered
first, and the order of consideration of objects and characters will be (1) egg
production, (2) meat production, (3) superficial characters.
Mating fowls for egg production. In common practice mating for egg pro-
duction deals only with a few essential characters. Whatever the type or variety,
when eggs are the special object the male should be an active, vigorous bird, and
one that grew quickly and matured a little earlier than the average for males of
his race. He should be of at least average size or, in a variety having a standard
for weight, should closely approximate that weight. The hens should be selected
for the same points, except that, as each hen influences only a small proportion
of the offspring, and the mating ratio is usually made as wide as possible, it is
not so necessary to give special attention to the point of early maturity in indi-
vidual cases. If the mating is made, as it should be, before February, any pullets
that are then well developed and laying may be used with reasonable assurance
that the proportion of slower-maturing birds is not large enough to materially
affect the general result, provided the male is not one that developed slowly.
The matter of size is more important in selecting breeders to produce layers
than in selecting layers. Slightly undersized hens often lay as well, or better,
than larger hens, and lay as large eggs. A male a little under size may give
offspring not notably smaller than those of a somewhat larger male, but the
continued use of breeders of less than average size for their kind quickly reduces
the average size of the stock. Even with care to use only birds not below medium
size, the proportion of smaller stock is usually larger than desirable. Many
poultry keepers who are indifferent to this point in mating offset their error by
careful selection of the eggs set, taking only such as are of good size, form, and
color. When only a small proportion of the eggs are to be set, this may be the
more convenient and economical way to select; but since the hens of medium
size, or larger, are usually the hens that lay the kind of eggs selected, it is
better, when the object is to get as large a proportion of selected eggs as pos-
sible, to exclude small birds from the matings.
Breeding for improvement in egg production. The practice in mating just de-
scribed, with good management in growing and handling the stock, will bring the
egg production from poor-laying flocks to a good annual average, with occasional
production in a part of a stock or for a season much above the average. These
occasional instances of great production stimulate interest in the question of
bringing the common average production of a stock up to the high marks, and
the results from the best producers proportionately higher. Many breeders
have tried to develop heavy-laying strains from known great producers. Results
have sometimes seemed encouraging in a few individuals, but there are no
authentic records of extraordinary laying characteristics continued in a stock, or
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 493
even in selected specimens, for more than a very short term of years. More
careful experiments on an extensive scale have been carried on for many years
at the Maine Experiment Station, with similar results.1 The present line of
experiment at this station seeks to determine how far egg production may be
improved by breeding from prepotent heavy layers. As far as increase in possi-
bilities of egg production in the individual is concerned, the whole question
seems to depend on whether or not the number of ovules produced by a bird
is congenitally fixed in the individual, variable in individuals, and generally so
small that the supply might
be exhausted within the aver-
age productive life of a hen,
that is, within three or four
years. It has been commonly
assumed that the possibilities
of production in the ordinary
unimproved hen were small
and were increased by selec-
tion. It has been supposed
that ordinarily a hen having
laid a few hundred eggs would
permanently cease because of
the exhaustion of the supply
of ovules. The observations of
Raymond Pearl and Frank M.
Surface on the numbers of
visible ovules indicate that
there is always present a
greater supply of elementary
eggs than any hen is capable
of developing. Here, as every-
where, nature is prodigal with
the elements of life. With Fic. 482. Dark Brahma cockerel with extraor-
the number of elementary inary breast development. (Photograph from
owner, F. W. Rogers, Brockton, Mass.)
eggs in an ordinary hen five
or six times as great as the
total of eggs laid by the average hen kept until three years old, it is plain that
the practical problem in breeding for increase in egg production is to produce
stock with the substance, constitution, and functional vigor required for the com-
bined strains of heavy egg production and reproduction. Asa rule, it is found that
1 Actually the first line of experiment at this station showed a decrease in
egg production, but the results are not strictly comparable to the results of
experiments of individuals, because the individual breeder discards all apparently
inferior specimens, while at this station close selection of breeders was not fol-
lowed by close selection of pullets for layers, except in one or two instances
for special observation.
494 POULTRY CULTURE
as breeders the greatest producers are inferior to average good producers. Hens
producing two hundred eggs in a year are not as likely to produce daughters
that are extraordinary layers as are hens that have performed more moderately.
The great laying individuals come generally from moderate layers of strong
constitution. Extreme heavy laying saps vitality and tends to sterility.
In the light of the commonly observed facts as to the increase of individual
egg production, the extraordinary layer appears as the culmination of the devel-
opment of the tendency and capacity to develop eggs. In general, what may be
Fic. 483. Silver-Gray Dorking cock, ideal table shape. (Photograph from
owner, Arthur C. Major, Ditton, Langley, Bucks, England)
regarded as the supreme effort in egg production leaves the individual without
reserve force for reproduction. A rare individual with vitality enough for both
may prove a good producer of heavy-laying stock. Such an individual, of great
prepotency, might be bred, with striking results in high egg production, for a gen-
eration or two, but the steady drain of egg production, and its ordinary effect on
reproduction, tends always to abrupt cessations of progress in this direction.
Influence of the male on production of eggs. If the supply of elementary
eggs is always ample the only influence of the male to be considered is his
influence on those characters which affect the capacity to develop eggs. It has
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 495
Fic. 484. Light Brahma cock!
repeatedly been found by
breeders who had made
marked increase in egg
production by simple selec-
tion and good care, and
by close breeding for a
term of years, that when
they went outside of their
stock for new blood, the
introduction of males of
different breeding was im-
mediately followed by a
sharp decline in egg pro-
duction. This fact has
been one of the strong
arguments in favor of the
theory that the number of
elementary eggs was rela-
tively small and was pro-
gressively increased by
individual variation and
selection. Such results are
often attributed to the use
of males not of heavy-
laying strains. Within heavy-laying stocks the lack of uniformity in results
of breeding shows that the sons of
heavy-laying hens reproduce that
quality in the same manner as the
daughters. Some males do unques-
tionably have a strong influence on
the laying capacity of their daughters,
but it seems to be due to transmission
of the characters that give capacity to
develop eggs.
Mating for table poultry. In the
development of poultry for food pur-
poses, more than in any other line of
poultry breeding, the conditions of
production tend constantly toward an
undesirable modification of form and
1 These birds won prizes for best-
shaped Light Brahmas at the Boston
Show when this variety was one of the
big classes there. They are birds of a
good utility type.
Fic. 485. Light Brahma hen!
496
Fic. 486. A “cochiny” Light Brahma
hen, not a utility type
POULTRY CULTURE
reduction of vitality. The develop-
ment of a meat-type fowl that will
grow quickly, fatten readily, and still
produce, at the season when eggs are
most difficult to secure, an abundance
of eggs that will hatch a high per-
centage of vigorous chickens, is the
most difficult line of work with poul-
try. A flying bird has enormous
development of the breast, that is,
of the muscles which move the
wings; the proportion of meat else-
where is very small. Terrestrial
birds in the natural state have the
muscles of the wings and legs more
equally developed, but in every case
the relative development of muscles
of the anterior and posterior sets of limbs, with their adaptations to different
methods of locomotion, depends
upon the habits of the bird and the
amount of use of each. When birds
are domesticated and the flying habit
discouraged, the inevitable result is
a reduction of the muscles of the
Fic. 487. Long-bodied Barred Plym-
outh Rock pullet}
Fic. 488. Barred Plymouth Rock cock,}
good utility type
1 Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts. Photograph
by Schilling.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 497
wings and an_ enlarge-
ment of the muscles of
the legs; and the larger
the bird, the more marked
is the difference in devel-
opment of the wing and
leg muscles. In flying
birds the meat of the legs
and that of the breast (or
wing muscles) are of al-
most the same color. In
most domestic land birds
the meat of the fore part
of the body is light (or
“ white ””), that of the hind
part, dark. In waterfowl,
not so far removed from
the flying habit, the meat
of the different parts is
much the same in color,
but with a tendency to
lighter color in the ante-
rior portions. Difference
in color of muscles of FiG. 489. Partridge Cochin cock. (Photograph by
different sets of organs of
locomotion in domestic
poultry is plainly due to difference
in development and use. Through
disuse the muscles of the wings,
which are the most highly devel-
oped muscles of the normal bird,
lose color, become soft, and finally
diminish in size. But it is this meat
which most people prefer; hence it
becomes necessary for the breeder
of table poultry to give particular
attention to the development of the
white meat, that is, to keep up the
quantity of development in this
character when its natural tendency
is to diminish. This he can do only
by the most rigid selection of breed-
ing birds well developed in this sec-
tion, and by different methods of
handling the birds to be developed
Graham)
Fic. 490. Partridge Cochin hen. (Pho-
tograph by Graham)
498 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 491. White Cochin hen. (Photo-
graph by Graham)
for breeding purposes and those to
be used for food as soon as they
have reached the desired stage of
development. Stock to be devel-
oped for breeding purposes must
be allowed and even encouraged?
to use the wings enough to coun-
teract the tendency to atrophy
through disuse.? The tendency to
fatten, most desirable in stock bred
for the table, is directly opposed to
the continued production of eggs.
A degree of fatness may be main-
tained with great prolificacy and
breeding power, but the general
tendency of breeding from birds
that fatten readily is to reduce egg
production and fertility. Unavoid-
able and troublesome as such con-
ditions are, the difficulties they
present may be overcome by selecting as breeders individuals which show,
with the fullest development of form, considerable activity, and by properly
differentiating between methods of
managing breeding stock and stock
not to be used for that purpose.
1JIn such heavy breeds as the
Brahma and Cochin, the difficulty
that some of the birds have in flying
to ordinary roosts two feet or so from
the ground leads some breeders to
discard roosts and bed the birds on
the floor. Invariably the stock of
such breeders will, after some years,
become conspicuously deficient in
breast. A fowl that, when in health,
cannot fly te a roost two feet from
the floor ought never to be consid-
ered for breeding table poultry.
2 This does not necessarily mean
that the bird should have the oppor-
tunity or develop the ability to fly
high. By flapping the wings, by using
them in running, and by low, short
flights, a bird may give its wing mus-
cles enough exercise to maintain
development.
Fic. 492. White Plymouth Rock cock,
owned by Elm Poultry Yards, Hartford,
Connecticut
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 499
Fic. 493. White Orpington hen. (Pho-
tograph from United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture)
What the breeder of table poultry
aims to secure in his stock is full form,
quick growth, and a fattening tendency
strong enough to make the birds fatten
readily under favoring conditions, yet
not so strong as to be troublesome
under the usual conditions given to
laying and breeding stock. As a rule,
that part of an individual’s lifetime in
which the desired balance of qualities
can be maintained is short as compared
with the normal productive life of its
kind. So we find that generally types
that make good poultry are the profitable
layers and breeders for only one, or at
most two, seasons; but occasional indi-
viduals are found which, in this and
other points to be considered by the
breeder of table poultry, are much bet-
ter than the average. A bird of table-
bred stock of any kind of poultry that will keep in good laying and breeding
condition for two, three, or more years is of great value for breeding this class
of stock, not only because it gives its progeny something of the general-
purpose character but because it
produces more, and more vigor-
ous, offspring, and is a service-
able breeder for several seasons.
In most stocks and breeds used
especially for table poultry the
tendency to fatten is strong
enough to make any vigorous
birds take on fat readily when
put up for fattening. In devel-
oping a table type from an egg
type, fattening tendency must be
given special consideration, but
in improving existing meat types
a degree of recessiveness in that
character is to be preferred.
Shape in table poultry. In
breeding for the table, shape
must be considered on a differ-
ent basis from that: used in
breeding to a special breed shape.
The shape distinctions between
Fic. 494. White Orpington cock.
graph by Graham)
(Photo-
500 POULTRY CULTURE
breeds nearly the same in size are
arbitrary. It is no advantage to a
Plymouth Rock to have a body a very
little longer than that of a typical
Wyandotte, or to weigh a little heavier ;
but the heavier fowl furnishes more
meat (if the proportion of bone, offal,
and edible meat are the same), and
(other proportions being approximately
the same) the longer-bodied fowl fur-
nishes more of the preferred white meat
than the other. This last is true as to
all poultry ; if a breeder, whatever kind
or variety he is working with, wants to
get the largest possible proportion of
white meat, he must give particular
attention to length of body, not be-
Fic. 495. White Plymouth Rock hen CaUS€ length is more important than
(Photograph from owner, Rockandotte the other dimensions, but because the
Farm, Southboro, Massachusetts) lack of it gives an impression of
plumpness and meatiness that is often
misleading.1 If Standard type is not to be considered, the longer the body
can be made without unduly lengthening legs and neck, or making the bird
unsymmetrical, the better.
When Standard require-
ments as to shape must be
observed, the body should
be as long as may be with-
out departing from the ap-
proved type; that is, in
selecting breeding birds,
the breeder of table poul-
try of a Standard variety
should always keep away
from the short-backed and
short-bodied types of that
variety.
1In the open market
this is an advantage to
the short bird; for a regu-
lar trade where the buyer
practically relies upon the
seller to give him satisfac-
tory goods, the long-bodied
bird, if properly filled out, Fic. 496. White Plymouth Rock cock. (Photo-
is better. graph from Rockandotte Farm)
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 501
Fic. 497. White Wyandotte cock. (Pho-
tograph from owner, Rockandotte Farm)
With all the length of body that
the bird can stand, or the Standard
will permit, the breeder should select
for breadth and depth of body, and
fullness of breast. The Dorking
shape is as nearly an ideal table
shape as any breed shape, the
combination of length, depth, and
breadth of frame, and fullness of
muscular development being, in the
finest types of the breed, as near
perfection as can be imagined.}
This shape may be closely approxi-
mated in a number of other breeds
without altogether losing the types
of those breeds. This is most ap-
parent when the bodies of females
are compared. A Plymouth Rock
hen of good length, breadth, and
depth of body, and exceptionally
good breast development for the
breed, will be a very good Dork-
ing shape; but because it stands a
little higher on the legs, with a shorter tail and smaller comb, the impression of
the whole type is different. Heavy-weight
type; Houdans and Faverolles show it
very strongly. Even in the Asiatics the
nearer we can get to the Dorking model
body without losing the carriage and
station which have been developed in
the Asiatic class, the better table fowl
we get.
1 With ideal table shape it might be
supposed that the Dorking would be more
popular in America. I have long thought
that it would have been but for a reputa-
tion for delicacy of constitution (which it
did not deserve), and for its large comb
and superfluous toes. Such superfluous
developments of appendages have always
been objectionable to the mass of Ameri-
can poultrymen. Add to these objections
the fact that the skin of the typical Dork-
ing is not yellow, and the superficial faults
more than overbalance, in the popular
mind, the substantial merits.
Leghorns tend toward the Dorking
Fic. 498. White Wyandotte hen
(Photograph from owner, Rock-
andotte Farm)
502 POULTRY CULTURE
In selecting birds for breeding, the poultry breeder should judge shape by
touch as well as by the eye. He should handle the birds, lifting them with the
Fic. 499. Young White Wyandotte
cockerel. (Photograph from owner,
A. G. Duston, South Framingham,
Massachusetts)
keel across his palm so that his fin-
gers on one side and thumb on the
other give him at once the measure
of development of meat on the body.
With a little practice the sense of
touch becomes much more reliable for
this than the eye. The bird that, when
balanced on his hand, fills it and
spreads it until it is well opened, will
hardly fail to be well meated all over.
Quality of meat depends primarily
on fineness of fiber, secondarily on
conditions under which the bird is
grown. Coarse-fibered meat may be
soft if the bird is so grown as to
keep it soft, but a bird of fine fiber
grown under similar conditions will
be far superior. Identification of this
quality in the living bird can be made
with sufficient accuracy by observa-
tion of the texture of comb and wat-
tles, and of the general structure of
head and feet. If these appear strong
without coarseness, the structure of
the muscular fiber will usually be fine.
In ducks, geese, and turkeys there is usually ample length of body, and the
common faults are lack of breadth and depth of body, and, in the waterfowl,
Fic. 500. Pekin Ducks at Connecticut Agricultural College. (Photograph from
the college)
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 503
lack of fullness of
breast. The best de-
velopment of the
table type in both
ducks and geese is
secured by develop-
ing the keel as it is
typically in Stand-
ard specimens of the
Rouen and Ayles-
bury ducks and of
Toulouse and Em-
den geese. The typ-
ical exhibition Pekin
duck is not so
well developed in
this respect as the
others mentioned,
but many market
Fic. 501. Aylesbury duck. (Photograph from E. T. Brown)
duck growers have stocks of Pekins in which this feature is fully developed.
In turkeys of the best table form the breast is more conspicuously developed
than in any other poultry; this is in accord with the flying powers of the bird.
Fic. 502. Aylesbury ducks at College Poultry Farm, Reading, England. (Photo-
graph from E. T. Brown)1
The shape and carriage of the head, neck, legs, and tail are of importance in
selecting for the table only in so far as they are correlated with and indicate
faults in shape of body, or lack of vigor. The well-developed body, if designed
only for the table, is not much the worse for that purpose if the legs are a little
1 Note that, with the exception of the second duck from the right in Fig. 502,
the Aylesburys do not show the type seen in Fig. sor but are more like the
Pekins in Fig. 500,
504 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 503. Pekin drake four months old, weighing
nine pounds, owned by H. B. Robinson, Reading,
Massachusetts
Fic. 504. Pekin duck, owned by H.B. Robinson
weak or a little too long
to look well, if the back
is a little crooked and
the tail carried too high
or too low to look well,
or carried awry, or if
the head and neck ap-
pear a little too fine;
but if the bird is to be
used for breeding, all
such faults should be
carefully avoided. The
color of the plumage
in table poultry is of
importance only as it
affects ease of dressing,
and here it is of most
importance when stock
is to be marketed while
immature.
Selection for shape
points in mating stand-
ard poultry. In se-
lecting for exhibition
Standard shape the type as
a whole must be considered.
This requires particular at-
tention to the head and its
appurtenances, and to the
neck, tail, and legs; for it is
these parts and their adjust-
ment to the body that chiefly
distinguish different breeds of
the same general type or class.
A bird that carries both head
and tail high will appear
shorter, one that carries head
and tail low longer, than it is,
because the carriage of the
head and tail makes a differ-
ence in the apparent length
of the back. In market poul-
try this is not a material point,
for in selecting for breeders the
length of keel, as ascertained
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 505
by touch, is a better
test of length in the
body of the breeding
bird than the length of
the bird as it appears
to the eye, and when
the bird is dressed, the
true length is apparent ;
but in judging exhibi-
tion stock, considered
section by section, the
back is judged as it
appears, and a bird of
this character may be
penalized in several
sections for a fault
which strictly belongs
to one or two. A slight
Fic. 505. Rouen drake, owned by White Birch Poul- difference in length of
try Farm, Bridgewater, Massachusetts leg will make a marked
difference in the station
and style of the bird. In nearly all breeds of fowls American fanciers want
the leg (shank and thigh) long enough to show the hock and something of
the outline of the thigh when the bird is seen in profile. The only clean-legged
breeds in which a leg with shank
appearing to come right out of
the body is at all favored are
the Dorkings and Orpingtons.
In all others the thigh should
show, and for most of them this
provision is a part of the un-
written standard, for only in the
Wyandotte and Game descrip-
tions is this point mentioned
in the “ American Standard of
Perfection.”
The shape of the wings sel-
dom requires special considera-
tion, except in case of deformity
of the first joint, causing, when
slight, inability to properly fold
the wing. When the defect is
more serious the wing may hang
badly and some of the feathers
be badly twisted. The worst
Fic. 506. Rouen duck, owned by White
Birch Poultry Farm
506
POULTRY CULTURE
cases are so conspicuous that they attract attention at once. The others are
often overlooked because, if noticed, it is supposed that the failure to tuck the
ry,
Fic. 507. White-Crested Black Polish
hen, owned by William McNeil, Lon-
don, Ontario
wing is due to fright from handling,
or that, in the case of cocks, the dis-
arrangement of the flights is due to a
slight slip of the wing in flirting,
which will soon be readjusted. This
fault is very common also in ducks
and geese. The breeder should make
sure that every bird selected for
breeding has perfect wings and can
carry them properly. Failure to do so
need not always lead to rejection of
the bird, but it calls for special care in
mating. If two birds with this fault
are bred together, the result is likely
to be a lot of offspring with deformed
wings.
The shape of the head appurte-
nances — comb, wattles, ear lobes,
crest, and beard — demands careful attention, for excellence in these points is
essential in exhibition stock, and even if a breeder is not breeding for show
or sale, and makes substantial qualities
of first importance, there is no need of
breeding birds good in other respects but
with heads for which he has constantly to
apologize. Birds selected for breeders
should have these characters of average
good quality for their type, and serious
defects in them should be admitted only
when a bird is so good in other respects
that it is policy to breed it even with the
expectation of discarding a considerable
part of its progeny for its fault. Asa
rule, there are no irregularities in mating
to meet Standard requirements in these
features. The breeder mates birds having
the character, in both sexes, as near as
may be to what he wants. An exception
is in mating to produce the male and fe-
male types of comb in large single-combed
Fic. 508. White-Crested Black Pol-
ish hen. (Photograph from owner,
Charles L. Seely, Afton, New York)!
1 Figs. 507 and 509 show a very pretty, dainty type of Polish, as bred strictly
for fancy. The photographs were taken by the author in rgot or 1902. Figs. 508
and sro show a larger, more rugged type bred by a farmer who is a Polish fancier.
This is the style now favored by breeders
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 507
Fic. 509. White-Crested Black Polish cock,
owned by William McNeil
fowls. The comb of the male,
however large, is required to
stand straight; the comb of
the female must always droop
to one side. To get the strong,
straight comb of the Exhibition
male, females with combs that
droop slightly or not at all
must be used ; to get the droop-
ing comb of the Exhibition fc-
male, males with weak combs
tending to lop, or droop, must
be bred with females with the
required type of comb. Ina
variety like the Brown Leg-
horn, in which a double-mating
system is used for color, the
requirements for producing
the desired accompanying type
of comb are simple. All that is necessary is to breed the females of the male
line with small, rather straight combs, and the males of the female line with
large combs with a tendency to
droop. In varieties in which
special color matings are not
required, the breeder usually
breeds from males with combs
as thin as will stand straight,
and use with them some fe-
males with thin, drooping
combs and some with smaller,
thicker combs standing straight
or nearly straight.
Cotor .MATINGS OF
POULTRY
Mating black-red fowls. Of
fowls with the colors and gen-
eral color pattern of the original
type there are many varieties,
— Black-Red and Brown-Red
Games of the English, Exhibi-
White-Crested Black Polish cock
(Photograph from owner, Charles L. Seely)
tion, and Bantam types, Black-Red Malays and Malay Bantams, Brown Leg-
horns, Cornish Indian Games, Partridge Cochins, Partridge Cochin Bantams,
Partridge Plymouth Rocks, Partridge Wyandottes, and Redcaps. In all of
508
Fic. 511. Stylish Single-Combed Brown
Leghorn cockerel!
POULTRY CULTURE
these the male is roughly de-
scribed as having a_ black
breast, body, and tail, with
a red back, and the female as
brown. When details of color
are examined the males are
found to vary in the shade of
red, the narrow red feathers
of neck, hackle, and saddle
being sometimes striped with
black, and the red and black
in the wings being regularly
distributed, the longest flight
feathers nearly black, and red
or brown appearing usually
in a distinct line along the
outer edge of the narrower
outer web of each flight
feather, or in irregular and less
distinct patches in the broader
inner web. In the secondaries
the black is found regularly on the inner web, not quite covering it; the red,
on the outer web and quill, and extending a little way on the inner web. The
wing coverts are black, the wing bows
red. In the darker varieties, as the
Cornish Indian Game and the Redcap,
the black tends strongly to encroach on
the red areas. In the lighter varieties, as
in the pullet-breeding Brown Leghorn
males, the red tends strongly to encroach
on the black. The object of the fancier
is to keep the different colors distributed
as exactly as possible in accordance with
the Standard specifications.
In the females of the black-red color
type are found two styles of distribu-
tion of color. On the Brown Leghorn
there is no regular pattern, but the dark
brown appears as a fine, even stippling
on the back and wings (except where
there is black in the male), while the
Fic. 512. Stylish Single-Combed
Brown Leghorn Pullet!
breast is a redder brown and the under part of the body an ashy brown. In
females of the other varieties the Standard calls for a light brown or bay
1 Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts. Photograph
by Schilling.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 509
Fic. 513. Single-Combed Brown Leghorn
cock, very full breast}
ground all over, and on this ground
two or three pencilings of darker
brown on each feather, except where
feathers are black in wings and tail,
and in the hackle where the feathers
are striped with black.
These Standard color require-
ments for the different sexes are in
a measure incompatible. There isa
natural difference in the coloration
of the sexes. The tendency in the
male is toward greater intensity of
color and the occurrence of the
more brilliant color in the distinctive .
male plumage; the tendency in the
female is toward a duller tone and
a more uniform distribution of
colors. But in bisexual reproduc-
tion these tendencies in a measure
counteract each other, as the breeder
of fowls of this color type finds
when he tries to produce, from
females in which the colors are distributed, males with colors distinctly sep-
arated, and from males in which he has segregated the colors in different
sections, females in which the colors are
distributed through all sections. “His
difficulties are increased when, as in the
penciled varieties, he tries to secure a
general separation by sections of color
in the male, and in the female the same
distribution of color in nearly all sections,
with separation of the colors in a distinct *
pattern in each feather.
Very early in the development of
colors in black-red types fanciers dis-
covered that the production of males
and females of the desired colors from
matings of Standard specimens was un-
certain; that the male with solid black
breast, mated with the female of correct
shade and type, was likely to produce
(through cross heredity in direct trans-
mission, and the blending of colors)
Fic. 514. Single-Combed Brown
Leghorn hen!
1 Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts. Photograph
by Schilling.
510 POULTRY CULTURE
males with the black of the breast and body more or less marked or tinged
with red, and females with a superabundance of black. It was found that
for the regular production of males with colors distinctly separated, females in
which the tendency was strong must be
used, and for the regular production of
females with the colors distributed uni-
formly as to sections, and separated on
feathers, males in which that tendency
was strong must be used. It was found
also that the external indications (the
indications in the plumage itself) of
color-breeding tendencies were usually
hia. 316. Single-Combed Brown
Leghorn hen?
Fic. 515. Single-Combed Brown
Leghorn hen!
plain. A Brown Leghorn or Partridge
Cochin male showing traces of brown all
through the black of his breast and body
was likely to breed, when mated with a
Standard-colored female of his kind,
pullets of the correct shade and mark-
ings; mated with darker females, he
might produce some males with black
breast and body and some females of
his own type and tendency, but results
were too often disappointing. Similarly,
the finest males of the approved color type were found to reproduce that type
best when mated with females with the same tendency to black body color.
Fic. 517. Single-Combed Brown
Leghorn hen!
1 Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts. Photographs
by Schilling. The bird in Fig. 516 is the daughter of the one in Fig. 514; that in
Fig. 515 is the granddaughter of the one in Fig. 516. The bird in Fig. 517 is in
the same line of breeding, —a very large hen, weighing 64 pounds, yet of good
shape and style.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 511
It was especially observed in breeding the Partridge Cochin, in which the
Standard requires very distinct pencilings in all sections in the female, that
while these pencilings could not be produced typically in the male, and the red
appeared only as a defect on the black of the breast
and body, the son of a well-penciled female, when
mated with females of Standard type, would usually
produce daughters similarly well penciled. On the
other hand, from a female with poor penciling (colors
distributed but pattern not arranged) a male might
be produced (to all appearances like the other) which,
mated with the same females, would give daughters
- distinctly inferior in penciling. Similar observations
Fic. 518. Model head of Were made in regard to the production of the desired
Single-Combed Leghorn type of males. The sexes having the same colors
male (Brown Leghorn)! in different patterns, the color of a male indicated
only the general shade or tone of color of his
daughters, the color of a female only the general color tone of her sons; and
unless the breeder knew the details of color of the sire of a female or the dam
of a male, he could form no idea of
what their influence would be on
the markings of their offspring of
the opposite sex. Thus it was
demonstrated empirically in the
experience of many breeders, most
of whom were not versed in the
science of evolution, that, in breed-
ing poultry in which the sexes differ
in color, the most important thing
to know about a bird is the color
of its parents.
For a long time the common
practice in mating Partridge Co-
chins and Brown Leghorns, which |
were the black-red varieties most
popular with fanciers, wasto make ,
intermediate matings, using a male
with a slight tendency to a mixture
of red in black sections with both
dark and light females in the same |
pen. This sometimes gives good |
birds of both sexes, — occasionally
a large proportion of them; but it
is, at best, a makeshift method of
getting results, and the breeder
é
§
ka
Fic. 519. Partridge Plymouth Rock cock-
erel. (Photograph trom owner, Frank T.
Chambers, Bristol, Pennsylvania)
1 Photograph from Grove IIill Poultry Yards.
512 POULTRY CULTURE
tograph by Graham)
who practices it cannot long com-
pete with one of equal skill who
breeds two distinct lines. It is a
significant fact that special mat-
ing for the sexes, though not
made a regular system until after
it had been adopted for another
pattern, was worked out first with
fowls of the colors of the natural
species, and as a result of the
fancier’s efforts to develop in each
sex the sexual color tendency.
Mating modified black-red
color types. We have seen that
the black-red color type, the same
in pattern in the males of many
varieties, is modified in the fe-
males of all these varieties; that
it may be changed in the females
without changing in the males;
that the males will regularly trans-
mit in their female offspring the
pattern peculiar to females of
their own race; and that the influence of the female coloration on the male
coloration may be very strong, developing a tendency to distribution of red
throughout the black, as in the female.
By further separation of the colors on
each feather in the female plumage the
several pencilings may be combined either
in a single broad penciling, or “ lacing,”
following the edge of the feather, as in
the Golden-Laced Wyandotte, or in a
spot, or “spangle,” near the tip of the
feather, as in the Golden-Spangled Ham-
burg, or in transverse bars crossing the
feather, as in the Golden-Penciled Ham-
burg. With these types of female color-
ation may be developed male types with
the female markings in all black sections,
the red sections remaining as_ before,
as in the Golden-Laced Wyandotte, or
changed to give on the special male
feathers a distribution corresponding to
that in the general plumage, as in the
Golden Polish, or with the black in all
Fic. 521. Partridge Wyandotte hen
(Photograph by Graham)
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 513
sections largely replaced by red, as in the Golden-Penciled Hamburg, which has
the breast of the male (of the ground color of the female without pencilings),
has black fluff, and has the sides of the body between the breast and the fluff
penciled as in the general plumage of the female.
These modifications, especially in the first two instances cited, are in the
direction of making a distinct pattern common to the male and female of the
black-red color type. Theoretically it should be possible to secure some modi-
fication of this type, making male and female identical in color, which would
result in regularly giv-
ing typical males and
females from matings
of standard specimens.
Many breeders of Laced
Wyandottes assert that
this will be the result, if
breeders will not under-
take to secure open cen-
ters and narrow lacing
in both sexes too rapidly,
and will patiently mate
birds with medium cen-
ters and lacing until the
pattern is well estab-
lished in both sexes.
This view seems sound,
but not many breeders
are willing to wait when
they can occasionally
get phenomenal speci-
mens by special matings. Fic. 522. Long-Tailed Japanese Phoenix cockerel,
Though there is no owned by Urban Farms, Buffalo, New York. (Photo-
regular double-mating graph by Schilling)
system in these modified
types, the principle applies wherever the color tendencies in the sexes differ.
Mating red and buff-color types. The red and buff varieties are derived
from the black-red type by the blending and reduction of the black and red.
There is practically no limit to the number of shades produced by combinations
of their colors. Not only are there all gradations of the mixture in the general
color tone of the plumage of birds of these color types, but there is always
some variation of shade (and often a great deal of it) in the different sections,
in different feathers, and (in less degree) on the same feather. Of the many
possible shades in this class of colors only three are recognized as Standard:
golden buff, in all buff varieties; red, in the Rhode Island Red; and dark red,
in the Buckeye. While the description thus rigidly limits buff fowls to one
and red fowls to two shades, it is absolutely impossible to secure uniformity in
cae POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 523. Silver-Penciled Plymouth Rock
cock. (Photograph by Graham)
Fic. 524. Silver-Penciled Plymouth
Rock hen. (Photograph by Graham)
varieties and flocks, and difficult
to get it in individuals. The
rigidity of the Standard only
serves to unify the ideals of
breeders, and to prevent the
breaking up of varieties into
subvarieties, as when Buff Co-
chins were bred in three color
subvarieties.
While commonly classed by
fanciers with black and white as
a“ solid color,”! and handicapped
with them in sweepstakes com-
petitions, buff and red shades
are the most uncertain of all in
transmission and the most un-
stable in the individual. With
both red and black present in
considerable amounts, there is a
constant tendency for these pig-
ments to separate and arrange
themselves as in the black-red
type. The black tends to go to
the wing and tail feathers, the
red to the feathers of the hackle and
the back. Hardly more than one bird in
a thousand in any variety will meet the
Standard requirement for uniformity
of surface color and hold that color until
and through the first adult molt. For
this reason an old buff or red bird that
is sound in color is even more valuable
as a breeder (compared with a similar
young bird) than an old bird of other
color types.
The general rule in mating buff and
red birds is to use birds of both sexes
as near the Standard shade of color as
possible and uniform in color. The
second specification is as important as
the first. A bird that is uniform but a
little lighter or darker than desirable
may not show as well among birds of
the stylish shade as one that, with the
1 Strictly the term describes the pattern rather than the quality of the color.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 515
Fic. 525. Silver-Penciled Wyandotte
cockerel, a nice type!
desired shade in some sections,
runs a little off in others, but it is
likely to give more satisfactory re-
sults in breeding. The tendency to
a uniform distribution of colors is
more valuable in a breeding bird
than the correct shade of color pre-
vailing in most sections but lost in
one or two. Systematic breeding
from the birds nearest the desired
shade of color, offsetting weakness
in color in one sex by strength in
the other, and applying the com-
pensation principle section by sec-
tion, when necessary, will keep a
stock of buff or red birds very close
to the Standard color.
As stated in the description of
the breeds, the Buff Wyandottes,
Plymouth Rocks, and Rhode Island Reds were at one time of nearly the same
color. The first Buff Leghorns were mostly weak in color, with a great deal of
white and some black. At the time when the buff craze came on in the early
nineties, the popular shade for Buff Co-
chins in the East was a very light buff,
in the West a rather dark buff. This
difference continues, but in less degree.
The very light birds favored in Eastern
shows when the Buff Leghorn boom was
at its height were so reduced in buff pig-
ment that the color began to break up
and show traces of white throughout the
plumage. When this stage was reached
it was necessary to “feed” the stock
some dark color by using dark birds in
some matings. The feeding process often
caused such lack of uniformity that the
breeder’s stock was not found in the show-
rooms again for one or two seasons.
In the darker shades of buff, fluctua-
tions still continue, but as long as the
color is strong enough to keep out the
YY,
Fic. 526. Silver-Penciled Wyandotte
pullet. Good bird with poor head}
white, a variation of a few shades is immaterial. In red fowls the tendency
has been constantly to a darker shade, many breeders going beyond red in
Rhode Island Reds and getting a large proportion of brown specimens. With
1 Photograph from owner, James S. Wason, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
moran, ee, PR
Fic, 529. Front view of Silver-
Laced Wyandotte pullet!
Pig. 327. Sdver Laced Wyandotte cock-
erel, ‘This bird and the one in Fig. s25
are full brothers. The bird in Fig 328,
with the best-laced breast, fails in saddle
ide view of bird in
al
he
S
wi
Pie. 525. Silver Laced Wvandatte cock-
ere], {Photograph trom owner, John ©
Jodrev. Danvers, Massachusetts)
1 Photograph from owners, Wood and Fic. 531. Three-quarters rear view
Freeman, Fitchburg, Massachusetts. of bird in Fig. 529
516
4
Fic. 534. Barred Plymouth Rock pul-
let of the Exhibition male line. Re-
markably well-defined barring for a
“cockere-bred” female. This pullet
and the male in Fig. 532 make a medel
mating for Standard males !
Fig. 532. Exhibition Barred Plymouth
Rock cuckerel?
¥1e.533. Exhibition Barred Plymouth
Rock pallet. ‘This puller and the
male in Fig. 535 make a model mating
for standard females. Many of the
males from such a mating will be
much lighter in color than the sire?
Pic. 535. Barred Plymouth Rock cock-
erel of the Exhibition female linc }
+ Owned by Grove Hill Poultry Yards, Waltham, Massachusetts. Photograph
by Schilling.
517
518 POULTRY CULTURE
the idea that the blending of extremes will produce a mean, many have mated
these dark brown specimens to light buff or salmon birds. The usual result
is a mottling of the shades in the progeny. A light or dark bird may be used
to tone up or down in the progeny the color of a bird a few shades lighter
or darker than itself, but extreme matings always produce variegation.
While standards for red fowls require or allow considerable black, the breeder
should always work away from black and endeavor to secure rich red through-
out, for the development of fanciers’ ideals and of standards is always in the
direction of uniformity of color
in a variety which has no pro-
nounced pattern in the plumage.
Mating black-white color types.
The black-white color types pre-
sent the same phenomena as the
black-red, with the red replaced
by white. Though red is con-
sidered a strong positive color,
and white merely absence of color,
the colors behave in just the
same way in the Dark Brahma
as in the Partridge Cochin, in
the Silver-Laced as in the Golden-
Laced Wyandotte, in the Silver-
Penciledasin the Golden-Penciled
Hamburg. In mating any of the
varieties with these color combi-
nations the breeder who finds it
difficult to get good specimens of
(Photograph from owner, A. Q. Carter, both sexes from the same mating
Freeport, Maine) must carefully study his type, his
individual birds, their ancestry
and their progeny, and determine how far it is necessary to cater to sex tend-
encies by special matings to produce what standards require.
Mating the gray, or blue, barred pattern. Barring in all sections of both
sexes is in appearance one of the simplest of color patterns. ‘“ Common look-
ing” is a phrase often applied to the finest Barred Plymouth Rocks by people
who do not know how difficult it is to produce fine finish in this pattern, and
do not appreciate the results. The pattern seems to have been comparatively
crude in all varieties in which it was found, until the keen competition of Barred
Plymouth Rock breeders brought it to a high state of perfection. The fancier’s
attitude toward sexual differences in color in this variety is just the opposite of
his attitude toward such differences in pronounced black-red color types. In
the Brown Leghorn and varieties similar in color he cultivates the sexual tend-
ency to differences in color; in the Barred Plymouth Rock he cultivates the
opposing race tendency to similarity in color and markings. The result is
Fic. 536. Typical American Dominique cock
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 519
secured in both cases by the
application of the same prin-
ciple of special mating, —
breeding not the Standard-
colored bird of either sex to
a mate of the other sex of the
same shade of color, but the
male to a female of the color
and breeding of his dam, and
the female to a male of the
color and breeding of her sire.
There is, however, this differ-
ence in the cases compared:
when sexual differences in
color are exaggerated by a
standard, the application of
the principle keeps apart the.
lines of breeding, or subvari-
eties. When a standard seeks
to make the sex color types
identical, the application of the
principle of special matings
tends first to fix the types and
finally to fuse the lines. Allu- Fic. 537. Light Brahma cockerel, owned by
sion was made to this in the H. B. Robinson, Reading, Massachusetts
paragraph relating to modified
black-red types. Nowhere =
is the evidence of prog-
ress toward fusion of sex
varieties as marked as
in the evolution of the
Barred Plymouth Rock.
From within a few years
after they were estab-
lished, the two lines have
been steadily converging.
The dark females with
indistinct barring, once
used in the male line, and
the nearly white males
with just a suggestion of
barring, once used in the
female line, are rarely
seen now. Crosses of the Fic. 538. Same as Fig. 537. Note how the pose
two lines are occasionally changes the apparent shape
520 POULTRY CULTURE
made by skillful breeders with good results. The barring is becoming narrower
and more distinct, and the general color tone darker. It seems plain that a
time will come when the two lines of the Barred Rock will be one, but how
soon no one can say. At the present stage of their development they are’
satisfactorily fused only by breeders of great skill, thoroughly familiar with
the breeding of both lines of stock used, and by them only occasionally. Nor
is the result at this stage to start a new line on the single-mating system; it
simply starts a new family on one of the old lines.
While the Standard specifies that bars shall be straight across the feather,
uniform in width, distinct, and free from any brownish or greenish tinge, such
perfection of color and pattern appears in only a small proportion of specimens.
The bars on many birds still tend to the crescentic form once prevalent even
in well-bred stock. A common fault in
barring is the breaking of the bar as it
crosses the shaft of the feather, the part in
each web being straight but not matching
at the quill. In the flight feathers of the
wings good clear barring is comparatively
rare, the bars presenting more of the un-
even appearance described as “ marbled.”
The brown and green tinges in the dark
bars, often seen in both males and females,
give the surface color a muddy, dirty look.
Fic. 539. Showing remarkable Both are likely to be most conspicuous on
wing of Columbian Wyandotte the backs of males but appear in all sec-
pullet in Fig. 4211 tions. All these faults should be carefully
avoided in selecting breeders. A pair free
from them is worth more to the breeder than any number of birds in which
they are prevalent. Feathers wholly or partly black are found in varying
numbers in nearly all barred fowls. Unless they are large or conspicuously
abundant, a good bird should not be discarded for them. It is practically im-
possible to breed them out entirely.
The color of the beak and shanks in the Barred Plymouth Rock male is
usually of the yellow demanded by the Standard. In the Standard female a
perfectly clean yellow beak and leg is rare. The Standard allows a little dark*
stripe on the beak. Nearly all pullets show some dark spots on the shanks
after they begin to lay, if not earlier. The females of the male line have
quite darkly shaded beaks and legs.
Mating the ermine? color type. White with black points — that is, black
on neck, wings, and tail—is the color of the Light Brahma, Columbian
1 Photograph from owner, Sunny Brook Farm, West Orange, New Jersey.
2 A variety called the Erminette, white with black spots in the plumage, the
converse of the Houdan, was at one time bred in America, and there may still
be some in existence. As long as the Light Brahma was the only distinct variety
bred white with black points, the term “ light,” describing the bird as light in color
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 521
Fic. 540. Model Single-Combed White
Leghorn cockerel }
Wyandotte, Columbian Plymouth
Rock, and, in more crude form,
of the less popular Lakenvelder.
This color pattern appears as the
elimination of black from the
surface of the body plumage of
a silver-laced or silver-penciled
type, leaving the bird white with
black in the wing flights and tail
and a black stripe in the hackle.
As has been stated, the Light and
Dark varieties of the Brahma
were not clearly differentiated
when brought from China. The
early Light Brahmas showed a
great deal of black or gray on
the back, breast, and body. For
many years the ideal of Light
Brahma breeders was a white
fowl with neck-hackle cleanly
striped with black; tail black,
tail coverts black with clean edge or lacing of white; wing black or nearly black
in the flights, with one web black in
the secondaries, but no black show-
ing when the wing is folded. A little
black ticking in the saddle near the
tail was tolerated in an Exhibition
male and considered desirable in a
male for breeding. Recently,adarker
type of Light Brahma has sometimes
been given preference. In this type
males have very heavy striping in
the hackle, and have the striping in
the saddle extending well up to the
cape, making the back almost the
same asin Dark Brahma and Silver
Wyandotte males. This corresponds
with the popular type of Columbian
Wyandotte. Whether this type will
Fic. 541. Model Single-Combed White
Leghorn pullet!
but not white, was adequate. With the appearance of Wyandottes and Plymouth
Rocks of the same color type, “light” no longer answers for a general description
of the color, while the name “Columbian” has no appropriateness whatever.
Every other variety of these breeds having a name descriptive of its color, the
appropriate names for these are Ermine Wyandotte and Ermine Plymouth Rock.
1 Photograph from owner, Harmon Bradshaw, Lebanon, Indiana.
522 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 542. Single-Combed White Leghorn cockerel
popular, crosses with both Light Brahmas and Silver-
Penciled Wyandottes were made to strengthen the
black color. The variety was largely in the hands of
breeders not familiar with the behavior of the colors
in the pattern.
Most of them
were insistent
for black wings
(flights)and for
strong striping
in the hackle Fic. 543. Head of Rose-
Fic. 544. Rose-Combed White Leg-
horn pullet?
and saddles of
males,—points
which cannot
be regularly obtained without bringing
out a great deal of black elsewhere,
particularly in the backs of the females,
where it appears as mossiness.
The most reliable method of mating
this color pattern to secure clean white
surface and strong black points is to
use males with a white edging on the
lower web of each flight, with clean,
continue popular is uncertain.
Extensive black striping in
white ‘backs cannot be se-
cured without more black
than is desirable in other
white sections. The general
tendency in the development
of color patterns in fowls is
to clean color in sections
where there is no definite
pattern. For these reasons
it is most probable that there
will be a gradual return to
the older type. The Colum-
bian Wyandottes, during the
decade after their introduc-
tion, in which they were bred
by only a few breeders, were
very poor in color, the white
brassy, and the black very
weak. After they became
Combed White Leghom
cockerel!
1 Photograph from owner, Turtle Point Farm, Saratoga, New York.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 523
sharply defined striping in
the hackle, a little ticking
(but not pronounced strip-
ing) in the saddle, tail coverts
with clean white lacings, the
surface black in every sec-
tion jet black, and the sur-
face white a clean white;
the females should not be
quite so strong in color.
Females with black or nearly
black wings will usually show
poor striping in the hackle,
the black stripe too wide
(breaking the white edge at
the tip of the feather), and
the white margin flecked
with black (smutty). It is
better to select both males
Fic. 545. Single-Combed White Leghorn cock? and females first for good
striping in the hackle, and
not reject for white in the flights unless it is excessive. In general there is a
degree of correlation in black
sections (a weak wing accom-
panying weakness of color in
the main tail feathers and in
the hackle), but this is not
regular.
To produce the now fash-
ionable darker type, without
white in the upper webs of
flight feathers and with strong
striping in the saddles of
the males, selection must be
made for these points, with
(at present) some sacrifice in
cleanness of surface white.
Whether it is possible ulti-
mately to produce the color
pattern with striping on the
backs of males and clean
white surface on the backs of
females is debatable — and
doubtful. Such specifications
Fic. 546. Single-Combed White Leghorn
cockerel, extra good breast!
1 Photograph from owner, Elm Poultry Yards, Hartford, Connecticut.
Fic. 548. White Langshan hen.
This hen and the cock in Fig. 547
are shown in different positions
on page jot. Good type, except
back is a trifle short. In the male
it should form a U not a V!
hig. 347. White Langshan cock !
Fis. 349. Black Tangshan pullet
This bird and the cockerel in
Fig. 550 are in type intermediate
between that shown on pare 390
and the Pnglish Exhibition type?
Fic. 550. Black Langshan cockerel?
1 Photograph from owner, Paul P. Ives, Guilford, Connecticut.
524
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 525
are inconsistent. If followed, they lead to a double-mating system and to the
development of male and female lines as subvarieties.
Mating white fowls. The novice usually assumes that white birds must be
easy to breed, for (as he supposes) they have no color. The fancier of white
fowls soon finds that it is as difficult to produce an absolutely white bird as to
produce a party-colored bird perfect in all sections, and particularly difficult to
produce the combination, now required by the American Standard, of dead-
white plumage and yellow legs, beak, and skin. Most of the birds of this
description seen in the
shows are washed to re-
move from the feathers
the oil which gives them
a creamy tint, and some
are bleached to remove
the more objectionable
brassiness prevalent in
new white varieties and
in carelessly bred stock.
“White” as a description
of a color of poultry is al-
ways relative; birds that
have positive white where
they are white, and no
trace whatever of other
color, are not known to
poultrymen. In the col-
ored varieties of poultry
we find everywhere the
principal effects due to Fy¢. ser. Single-Combed Black Minorca cock. (Pho-
varying intensities and tograph from owner, Arthur Trethaway, Wilkes-
combinations of black and Barre, Pennsylvania)
red. In the whitest fowls
traces of one or another of these colors are always present,! sometimes toning
the white throughout, sometimes appearing as splashes or ticks of red or black.
It has long been observed by fanciers that the whitest birds are most likely to
have black ticking in the web of the feathers (sometimes a great deal of it), while
those free from black ticking are likely to be creamy, that is, have a trace of
red. Apparently, the small residue of color left after the elimination of color
has been carried as far as possible will be, as a rule, of one color or the other,
—red or black, not both; and apparently, a residue of red tends to distribute
itself throughout the plumage and a residue of black to appear in specks or
1 To the novice not trained to consider colors in poultry critically, such state-
ments always seem absurd. He supposes that he has seen hundreds or thousands
of domesticated fowls that are absolutely white. His awakening comes when he
exhibits a bird that he supposes is white.
526 POULTRY CULTURE
ticking. This is the case
where the color is re-
duced to the minimum.
With more color pres-
ent, splotches of red,
and red feathers, as well
as black, will appear.
In considering color,
in white birds it is nec-
essary to distinguish
between the creaminess
due to superabundance
of oil (fat) in the growing
feather, and the creami-
ness due to the distri-
bution of red. The
former tends to dis-
appear as the feathers
mature, and may be re-
moved by washing ; the
latter cannot beremoved
without damage to the
feather. It appears as
creaminess when little red is present; as the red increases, it becomes straw-
colored, and the bird is said to be “brassy.” Brassiness is always most
pronounced on males and in the
sections which are red in black-
red fowls. Usually it is of a dis-
tinctly yellow cast, rather glossy,
and appears to be on the surface
rather than in the substance of
the feather; but sometimes it is
dull and seems to permeate the
web where it appears, and in
such cases it is likely to be found
in both sexes and in all sections.
Sometimes the red appears as a
faint bricky (in some lights, rosy)
tint in the white, probably due to
the combination of minute par-
gre a and black. le ee : :
ults of white plumage = [Bex ea wie wed
are always plain in stock not bred
with care to eliminate them, and
Fic. 552. Rose-Combed Black Minorca cock !
F1G. 553. Rose-Combed Black Minorca hen!
1 Photograph from owner, G. A. Clark, Seymour, Indiana,
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 527
are never wholly absent in the
best-bred stock. When serious,
they cannot be got rid of by
any quick method. In stock
in which brassiness is bad no
improvement of consequence
can be made by mating with
good white stock. Because
brassiness may not appear in
females, a breeder often sup-
poses that it does not exist in
them, and uses them with
white males. Almost invariably
the result is brassy males in
the offspring. It is just as
necessary to know that the sire
of an apparently very white
hen was free from brassiness
as to know the breeding of the
Fic. 554. Rose-Combed Black Minorca cock-
erel. Undeveloped form of Fig. 5521 sire of a black-red female. In
White Plymouth Rock males
close inspection often shows a suggestion of black barring, especially in the
hackle, and sometimes the tips of hackle feathers are plainly tipped with gray.
The whitest plumage is secured only by long-continued selection of the whitest
birds. In the present state of development of white breeds no one who breeds
for exhibition can afford to waste
time with birds in which brassiness
is conspicuous. Those who breed
white poultry for utility purposes
need not be so careful, but males
that are badly brassy should never
be used.
Mating black fowls. It is as
rare for a black fowl to be dead
black as it is for a white fowl
to be pure white. Ordinary black
fowls are a rusty black or a
brown black, usually with white
appearing as gray in various parts
of the plumage, oftenest in the
wing flights, in the concealed tail : 5
feathers, and in the undercolor. Fic. 555. Rose-Combed Black Minorca
Even in good black fowls red is pullet. Undeveloped form of Fig. 5531
usually present, either visible or
1 Photograph from owner, G. A. Clark, Seymour, Indiana.
ERRATA
Ss
Fra, 556. Single-Combed Rhode Island
Red cock. (Photograph from owner,
Frank D. Read, Bridgewater, Massa-
chusetts)
Fic. 557. Single-Combed Rhode
Island Red pullet
POULTRY CULTURE
latent, and the black is never abso-
lutely free from white.?
Black stock that has not been very
carefully bred for color is usually a
brown black. Breeding from the
blackest of such brown-black birds
develops the Standard jet black with
the green surface, sheen, and brown
casts eliminated. After this stage of
development has been reached it
becomes necessary to check the in-
tensification of black by breeding
with a Standard bird of one sex a
mate of the other in which the black
is dull yet free from pronounced
rustiness. If two jet-black birds are
mated, further intensification of the
black seems to bring it to disinte-
gration, and brings out purple bar-
ring, which is a most objectionable
character. The occurrence of white
Fic. 558. Single-Combed Rhode
Island Red hen?
1 Some of the most careful breeders and expert exhibitors of black fowls say
that white can always be found in a black fowl if the examination is thorough. A
breeder of Black Leghorns and judge of many black varieties, who had had over
twenty years’ experience with them, once told me that no matter how carefully a
black fowl was examined for white, and faulty feathers removed, he could always
go back and find another.
2 Photograph from owner, Frank D. Read.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 529
has. 560. Single Combed Buff Qi
pinglon hen. ('thotograph from
owner, Miss HE. 1. Hooker.) This
female and the male in Fix. 339
Pra. 359. Single-Combed Butt Orpington cock show a type halfway between the
(Photograph from owner, Miss Henrietta Ko Plymouth Rock and the Cochin
Ivoker, South Hadley, Massachusetts:
Fic. 561. Buff Cochin pullet Fic. 562. Stylish Single-Combed Buff
Leghorn cock?
1 Owned by Thomas Peer, Fairfield, New Jersey. Photograph by Graham.
530 POULTRY CULTURE
Fic. 563. Single-Combed Buff Leghorn
hen; a nice specimen?
in black fowls and in black plumage
in all fowls is often due to poor con-
dition when the plumage is growing,
—a point to be considered with due
allowance when birds are being se-
lected for breeders. The fault is
most conspicuous and most serious
when it appears in the flight feathers
of the wings. If found here in con-
siderable amount in birds of a stock
which has been quite free from it,
the presumption is always that the
bird was a little out of condition
(perhaps lousy) when the feathers
were growing, and that, if in good
condition at the breeding season, it
is likely to produce offspring that
under good growing conditions will
be as free from the fault as its ancestry. A breeder working with stock that
he does not know may, for once, give to a bird with too much white the
benefit of the doubt. Then if the fault seems racial, he should secure birds
free from it to breed with his stock, or perhaps get altogether new stock.
Undercolor. In all the pre-
ceding discussions of selection
for color, surface color only has
been considered. Undercolor,
the color of that part of the
soft feathers which does not
show as they lie in natural posi-
tion, is of nearly equal impor-
tance. Defective undercolor is
a much more serious matter in
a breeding bird than in an ex-
hibition bird, though even in
the latter it is a serious fault.
Standard specifications as to
undercolor are in many in-
stances lacking, and rarely give
the breeder a clue to the weak
places in undercolor.
In all d/ack-red types the
prevailing tone of the under-
Fic. 564. Single-Combed Buff Leghorn cock?
color is slate, that is, there is white distributed quite evenly through the
undercolor that does not appear (or is desired not to appear) on the surface.
1 Photograph from owner, Monmouth Poultry Farm, Freneau, New Jersey.
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 531
Fic. 565. Single-Combed Buff Leghorn
pullet, very sound color?
This white often appears as white
at the base of the feathers next the
skin all over the bird. The amount
of white may be small or it may be
considerable. There are two places
on the fowl where this white tends
especially to crop out, the tendency
being particularly strong in the
male, — at the base of the tail and
on the back of the neck, in the
hackle. In poorly bred males of
this color type white at the base of
the tail is conspicuous and may
extend for some distance on the
main tail feathers. It is hard to
eliminate entirely even in well-bred
birds. It is more noticeable in
Games and Brown Leghorns than
in Cochins, Wyandottes, and Plymouth Rocks, because the tail is larger and
the saddle feathers are less profuse. The white in the neck, unless very bad,
does not show on the surface. If present, it may be found by parting the
feathers of the hackle, or cape.
Sometimes it is there for one
third or one half the length of
the feathers when no sign of
it is seen on the surface.
In the individual bird such
defects, if not conspicuous on
the surface, are not of great
importance, but as they occur
in most pronounced form in
the males, and a female show-
ing them slightly or not at all
may be the daughter of a male
in which they were very bad,
unless the breeder is sure of
his females it is doubly nec-
essary that he should avoid
breeding from males with
such faults.
In the modified black-red
types the tendency is to lighter
Fic. 566. Single-Combed Buff Leghorn cock-
erel; shy, and would not pose to show style
undercolor. As long as white does not break out, some diminution of the
intensity of the slate color is not objectionable.
1 Photograph from owner, Monmouth Poultry Farm, Freneau, New Jersey.
532 POULTRY CULTURE
In the darh-red
types, with black in
the wings and tail, the
undercolor is usually
red with more or less
slate, the slate, when
present, appearing asa
bar next the surface.
If black points are re-
quired or allowed, a
moderate amount of
slate in undercolor is
not objectionable, but
care must be taken to
avoid repeated matings
of birds with much
slate, for the tendency
of such matings is to
bring out black specks,
and sometimes indis-
tinct pencilings, on the
Fic. 567, Young Rouen drake, owned by Howard B. gurface.
Robinson, Reading, Massachusetts In buff birds, and
in ved birds in which
it is desired to reduce the black as much as possible, slate in undercolor should
be scrupulously avoided, and
selection made for under-
color as near the surface color
as possible. The strongest
buff and red undercolor is
always a little lighter than
the surface color, but strong
surface color is often found
with weak undercolor. In
these colors, if surface and
undercolor are very nearly
the same shade and the
former somewhat faded and
mottled by exposure, a bird
may appear to have good
undercolor and poor surface,
and in such cases the under-
color may afford a better ————————————
index of the breeding char- Fyg, 568. Old Rouen duck, owned by Howard B.
acter of the bird than the Robinson, Reading, Massachusetts
APPLICATION OF PRINCIPLES OF BREEDING 533
surface color. Buff and red
Fic. 569. Black Sumatra Game cock. (Photo-
graph by Graham)
varieties are especially prone
to white in the hackles of the
males, and the breeder of these
varieties should always look
for it there.
In the d/ack-white type and
its modifications, and to a less
extent in black varieties, the
white faults in undercolor ap-
pear. In most black varieties
the undercolor is a very dark
slate, but is sometimes a dull,
or brown, black. In the black-
white or gray color types white
is necessarily somewhat prev-
alent in undercolor, but with
so much white in the surface
its presence is often overlooked
until neglect of it leads to weak-
ening of the surface color. The
breeder has always to guard
against the troublesome white in the hackle and at the base of the tail. Where
white and black are mixed, he detects it in the weakening of black. If he fails
to notice that the black stripe in a hackle is broken across with white just
under the surface, he soon finds chickens developing with weak striping on the
surface. If he overlooks a little white
at the base of the main tail feathers
and sickles, he soon finds white ex-
tending farther out on these feathers.
In the evmzze types, as in the red
with black points, a light slate under-
color, or a slate bar just under the
surface, is favored by many breeders ;
and, as a rule, more or less black is
found in the undercolor of birds of
this type which have good black points.
In gray-barred fowls strong, clear
barring on the surface is preserved
only by careful selection for barring
in undercolor. It is not necessary that
the barring in undercolor be as clear
and the dark color as strong as in
the surface color. Some breeders of
Barred Plymouth Rocks tried for a
Fic. 570. Black Sumatra Game hen
(Photograph by Graham)
5 34 POULTRY CULTURE
while to develop it that way, but as the natural tendency is to darker color on
the surface than in undercolor, the result was to increase the black in the
surface color and make the birds too dark. Strong barring in undercolor is
still a fad with many breeders. Others require only that the bars be quite
distinct for the greater part of the length of the feather, and apparent, though
not sharply defined, down to the skin. If barring in undercolor is neglected
in selecting breeders, surface bars soon become indistinct, and white appears
in considerable amounts in the tail and neck.
In white fowls the undercolor is often the most reliable index of the quality
of surface color. Exposure to rain and sun may burn or stain the surface of a
good white bird so that it will look like a poor one. If the bird is whz¢e, the
undercolor, and especially the quills, will be free from yellow in ripe plumage.
In a very literal sense, undercolor in all birds with strong color is reserve
color. Unless intensified by mating and mixture with a color as strong as or
stronger than itself, the tendency in all plumage colors is to grow weaker.
There is also a tendency for color, if present, to come to the surface. If all the
color is at the surface, as it is in some buff and gray birds, a very slight loss
of color will cause marked deterioration in surface color.
Color selection of Rouen Ducks. The Rouen Duck is the only variety of
poultry, other than fowls, requiring special discussion of color. In all others
single Standard matings are the rule. In the Rouen Duck, as in the black-red
color type in fowls, the colors of the wild bird are intensified in domestication,
and sex differences in color are developed. Were the variety bred more exten-
sively for exhibition, the double-mating system would probably be used regu-
larly. As it is, it is used to some extent, and when special separate matings are
not used to produce exhibition birds of the different sexes, intermediate matings
are used.
The American Standard Rouen drake is a light-colored Rouen drake, the
Standard Rouen duck a dark-colored Rouen duck. The Standard duck is quite
similar to the Partridge Cochin hen in color and pattern, not so rich in color
or so well and uniformly marked, but still strongly suggestive of this Cochin
variety. The drake which matches this duck in breeding is very dark and
without the white ring around the neck so conspicuous in the exhibition drake.
The duck which in breeding matches the Standard drake is very much lighter
in color than the Standard duck, indistinctly penciled, and has a white ring
indicated around the neck. When only one pen is bred it is usual to mate a
medium male with females of both types. This gives a proportion of good
Standard birds of both sexes, but not so many as when typical drakes are
used in separate matings.
PART IV. THE POULTRY FANCY
CHAPTER XXVII
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS
Primary poultry exhibitions. The beginnings of poultry exhibi-
tions are to be found in England and Scotland in little gatherings
of poultry fanciers in taverns, and in America in small exhibits
of poultry at agricultural fairs. It is altogether probable that in all
countries where any degree of attention has been given to the
development of special types, the bringing of fowls to semisocial
evening gatherings of persons interested in them has been for
centuries an irregular custom, but we have definite information only
of those in Britain, in which some of the veteran American fanciers
of British birth took part. In America—so far as is known—this
type of informal private show was not developed until after public
exhibitions became somewhat general. Since then it has been an
occasional feature in meetings of local poultry associations. Ex-
hibits of poultry were made at agricultural fairs in Massachusetts
at least two years before the first special poultry exhibition at Bos-
ton in 1849. It is quite possible that poultry was shown at earlier
fairs both in Massachusetts and other eastern states.
The early informal evening exhibits brought together some of
the fancy fowls of a locality. The early exhibits at the fairs were
more in the practical line, representing the best poultry found on
farms. At these early agricultural poultry exhibits the exhibitor was
expected to furnish a written statement describing his stock and
giving an itemized list of his expenses for and receipts from his
poultry for a year preceding. Both the poultry and the report were
considered in awarding premiums, or bounties, as they were then
called, from the fact that the prize money was paid by the state.!
1 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts still pays an average of about $4000 a
year in poultry prizes at agricultural fairs.
535
536 POULTRY CULTURE
At first, prizes were given to common barnyard, or dunghill,
fowls, and to poultry of other kinds, not as individuals but as
flocks, or, in some cases, as representatives of flocks. In one of
the earliest reports, a farmer who exhibited a few turkeys for no
particular merit was awarded a bounty because the birds represented
a flock of eighty. Classification was made for popular varieties, but
if entries were not made in these classes, the poultry committee of
an agricultural society, in its discretion, awarded bounties to exhib-
itors whose exhibit represented real effort to develop poultry cul-
ture as a farm interest. The practical phase of poultry exhibits at
agricultural fairs soon disappeared, and they became, for the most
part, poorly patronized displays of thoroughbred stock of very ordi-
nary or very poor quality. This continued to be the general con-
dition for many years. When, after a time, efforts were made to
improve poultry departments at fairs, development was naturally
(through imitation) along the lines of the fancier’s shows.
Modern poultry exhibitions. The modern poultry exhibition
combines sporting, commercial, and educational features, with com-
mercial interests on the whole most potent, sporting interests tend-
ing to decrease, and the educational influence tending to increase.
The dominance of commercial interests is most noticeable in the
larger shows; in small local shows the sporting and educational
features may be prominent and the commercial tendencies hardly
apparent or entirely absent. As shows increase in size, the com-
mercial aspects develop, partly of necessity — for expenses increase
amazingly— and partly because the growing importance of the show
gives commercial value to prizes won there, and so induces com-
mercial breeders to exhibit, as well as fanciers. The larger and more
important the show, the greater the commercial value of a prize
won there. So competition at the great shows, and especially in
the leading popular classes, tends more and more to become a con-
test of commercial breeders for the lion’s share of the trade in eggs
for hatching and in stock for exhibition or for breeding. In such
competition the amateur fancier has little chance to win more than
an occasional prize, for with the commercial breeder, who is a pro-
fessional fancier, to win is necessary. He cannot afford to let prizes
go to others if by any legitimate method he can secure them for
himself, nor can he afford to be satisfied with a part of the more
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 537
important prizes in the class in which he competes, if by any means
he can secure them all. The advertising value of the five first prizes
on a variety at a New York show is worth probably twice as much
as the advertising value of four of the five first prizes, and many
times the advertising value of one prize in a class. One first prize
may mean a chance bird; the winning will attract little attention.
The winning of five first prizes on one variety indicates clear supe-
riority over competitors and gives a breeder who advertises them
sufficiently the cream of the trade in his variety for the year.
Educational aspects of exhibitions. The educational value of
a great poultry show is much greater than that of smaller shows,
but the number of those who can actually appreciate the great
show is relatively small, and as big shows are now conducted, a
visitor’s appreciation of the exhibits depends on his personal
knowledge of poultry and, to a considerable extent also, upon
acquaintance with the exhibitors, with their stock, and with their
previous records. The novice in the poultry fancy in a large show
has usually been left to his own devices; though poultry is espe-
cially adapted to demonstration, no provision has been made for his
entertainment or instruction. The crowds and the show as a com-
plete spectacle may interest him, but he is likely to be very much
at a loss to know what it is all about, and few persons not able to
form an intelligent opinion of their own about the exhibits and the
merits of the awards care to stay long at a poultry show where there
is no one to guide and instruct them. Thus the actual educational
value of the great show is closely limited to its value to experts. To
an expert poultryman one large show is worth scores of small shows,
giving him in a few days a much more accurate idea of conditions
and progress in various directions than could be obtained in weeks
of traveling among the breeders and manufacturers or among the
small shows.
That the neglect of novices among poultrymen, and of the public
at the large shows, is a fault which should be remedied is generally
admitted, but it is hard. to change the customs of exhibitions of
this character, and the general opinion of those who have given
some study to the subject is that the reformation of the large show
will come only when various plans for improving poultry exhibitions
have been worked out in the smaller shows. For that reason the
538 POULTRY CULTURE
treatment of the subject here will consider first the small show such
as may be held by a small group of poultrymen in any town or by
the poultry students at an agricultural college, describing methods
of promoting and managing such shows and suggesting ways of
increasing their educational value.
A poultry show primarily a competition of poultry breeders.
A breeder of one or many varieties of poultry may make a dis-
play of a number of specimens of each, but with the element of
competition lacking, such a display will attract much less attention
than a competitive exhibition containing fewer specimens and in-
ferior quality. The individual breeder’s display may make a very
attractive and important feature of a show, but no matter how large
or how good it may be, it does not constitute a show as the term is
commonly understood and used. The individual breeder’s display
“represents his own judgment of his own stock, or at most the
judgment of an expert in his employ. In competition the relative
merits of the birds are decided by disinterested parties according
to common standards. A judge is supposed to judge’ the birds
without knowing, or, if he knows, without considering, to whom
they belong, but the object of competition is always to determine the
relative skill of breeders as shown in the quality of their products.
Competition in live poultry necessarily in standard stock and
its products. Only things of the same kind can be compared.
Competition in living birds is on a basis of values measured mostly
by the eye. The table properties of a live bird are partly but not
fully indicated by its weight, condition, and shape, with feathers on.
The insufficiency of judgment for these qualities while birds are
living is so clear to every one that, though classes are sometimes
provided for live market poultry at shows, neither exhibitors nor
the public take much interest in them. Competition in poultry
products — eggs and dressed poultry —also resolves itself into a
competition in the products of similar varieties of poultry, because
differences in size and color of eggs and carcasses make it neces-
sary to classify them accordingly, and because continuous production
of eggs or poultry of a given description requires the maintenance
of a flock of such uniformity as can be best secured by careful
breeding to a particular type. While it is true that in the general
market handlers and consumers pay no attention to breed and
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 539
variety differences, and also that these differences are largely super-
ficial, close competition in eggs and dressed poultry inevitably
leads producers to give more attention to uniformity at all points,
and, as competitive exhibitors, to insist on classification by breeds
and sometimes by varieties. The exhibits of poultry at poultry
shows are almost exclusively of live fancy poultry, and this will
probably always be the case in the great majority of shows, for the
conditions of exhibiting poultry to be judged on appearance and
poultry produce to be judged on actual selling value are different,
and the possible values of winnings on exhibits of eggs and dressed
poultry are comparatively small. In the development of shows the
fancy comes first. :
An elementary poultry show. A few competing exhibits and
a judge to examine them and make the awards constitute an ele-
mentary show. The cost of a judge’s services renders it practically
necessary that the number of exhibits be large enough to make it
worth while to engage a judge. At the seasons (fall and winter)
when most shows are held, suitable shelter must be provided for the
exhibits brought together. Usually a public hall or a conveniently
located vacant storeroom is hired. The expenses for a judge and a
hall are the principal items of necessary outlay in holding a small
local show. A small amount is required for printing. If a judge
can be obtained near by, and if the show is limited, as it should be,
to two or, at most, three days, a little show may be held at a total
outlay of from twenty-five to thirty dollars. When a judge must be
brought from some distance, the cost of judging is much higher,
and the average small two-or-three-day show costs from fifty to one
hundred dollars for judging, rent, and incidental expenses, all the
work connected with it being done, asa rule, by the officers without
compensation.
Financing a show. The small amount of money needed for the
preliminary work of a show is usually provided by dues of mem-
bers of an association, or advanced by persons interested. The
regular receipts come from two sources, — entry fees for exhibits
dnd admission fees of visitors. In a rough division of the business
features of the show it is usually calculated that the entry fees for
exhibits will pay the judge and the regular premiums, and that, with
fair attendance, the door receipts will pay the rent and incidental
540 POULTRY CULTURE
expenses. On this basis most small shows can make a very low
entry fee, especially if they give ribbons instead of regular cash
prizes. On a show of several hundred birds, with exhibitors fur-
nishing their own coops, a fee of ten or fifteen cents a bird will often
pay for the judge and for feed for the birds during the show. In
these small shows the entry fee is rarely placed higher than twenty-
five cents per single bird, and one dollar per pen of five birds
(a male and four females). In nearly all shows the payment of
regular prizes is contingent on the number of entries in the class
being sufficient to make the entry fees pay the prize money and
other expenses which the entry fee should cover. If this is not
done, shrewd exhibitors can enter just enough birds in many classes
to take the prize money, and the show will lose on every such class.
When a show association furnishes coops, the entry fee must be
high enough to cover the cost of cooping.
A very small charge for admission usually brings in enough
money to pay the rent and the incidental expenses of a small show.
At ten or fifteen cents each, several hundred visitors may give as
much as is needed, or so near it that the promoters are satisfied.
Outside of large cities twenty-five cents is the maximum charge for
adults, with ten or fifteen cents for children. On such a modest
scale of arrangements and prices a local poultry show is on the
same basis as any other local entertainment, and, wherever it is
possible to get together some two hundred birds that will pass as
representatives of established varieties of poultry, may be made
instructive to exhibitors and entertaining to visitors. The profit
cannot be large, nor can the loss. This type of show is especially
adapted to places where breeders are mostly novices, but may be
used to advantage by breeders of considerable experience. A show
in a small place is much more likely to be permanent if rin ona
small scale than if the management undertakes to attract entries
from abroad and build up a big show.
The work of running a show. Usually two or three persons do
all the work connected with a small poultry show. Even for a small
show the amount of work to be done is much greater than is usually
supposed. For a small local show soliciting only local exhibits the
promoters have to do a great deal of personal work, — beginning
weeks or months in advance, — persuading poultry keepers to
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 541
exhibit, advising them in regard to selection and preparation of
exhibits, etc. The motives which induce men (and occasionally
women) to do this are various. Some do it out of interest in the
development of poultry culture, some for such prominence as it
may give them, some because they like such work. As the work
is out of all proportion to the rewards, the poultrymen benefited
usually accept the service without question as to the motives. Those
who, without previous experience, undertake to make a poultry show
should understand that if they go into it they must give it a great
deal of time and thought, especially during the first few years.
Some one (usually the secretary) supervises everything and person-
ally sees that details are looked after, though some of the work may
be done by others. One of the most important points in the manage-
ment of any show, large or small, is that it shall have a single head.
General quality of exhibits. In localities where no shows have
been held the quality of exhibits is usually rather poor. The breeders
of pure-bred stock in such places have, as a rule, very imperfect
ideas of what constitutes quality in their stock. Those who feel
most sure of their knowledge of requirements, if they have not
exhibited elsewhere, are often most rudely undeceived when their
birds are judged. The greater number of poultry keepers who might
exhibit, however, are reluctant to do so, feeling that their stock is
not good enough. The most effective appeal that can be made to
such persons to exhibit is the educational appeal, — the invitation
to bring their stock to be passed upon by an expert, and to learn
just how good it is and what they must do to make it better accord-
ing to existing standards. Provided there is not too great disparity
of quality in competing exhibits, so that the owners of the poorer
stock are entirely out of the running, just as much enthusiasm and
interest may be developed in a competition with ordinary good
birds as in classes of greatly superior quality, because the com-
petitots generally are in the same (novice) class.
Judges. Judges for initial small shows should be men of con-
siderable experience and good reputation. It is a mistake to take
an unknown and inexperienced judge, for the services of a judge are
chiefly valuable to exhibitors as a means of instruction, and that judge
is worth most who has the widest experience and can discuss and
practically demonstrate each variety as he judges it. In shows so
542 POULTRY CULTURE
large that the judges engaged must be free from interruption if they
are to get their work done on time, it is often necessary to exclude
exhibitors from the hall or from those parts of it where judging is
going on, but in shows of the class under consideration exhibitors
should be given every facility to see the judging of their exhibits
and to learn the judge’s reasons for placing birds as he does, for
in this is the greatest educational value of the show for them.
Methods of judging. The method of judging small shows is
usually by the score card. This method makes specific estimate of
values, and so is more satisfactory to novices than the comparison
method, and more useful for instruction where many points are
considered. These methods will be explained in the following
chapter. Exhibitors at shows of this kind should insist that the
judge be as severe on faults in their fowls as he would be at a
higher-class show. Some judges always score high at small shows,
cutting faults very lightly when judging, and so give exhibitors
false ideas of the value of their birds.
Classification. The classification of poultry in exhibitions should
be the same, regardless of the size and importance of the show
and of the quality of the exhibits. By wrong classification the
greater part of the possible educational value of a show may be lost
to exhibitors, and the exhibits may be misrepresented in reports
of awards. Different kinds of birds are not strictly comparable ;
neither are birds of the same variety but of different sexes and
ages. Young birds must be favored in weight and some points of
development, old birds in color (which has a tendency to fade with
age) and in all points where age brings deterioration. The common
classification for fowls makes five classes for each variety, — four
classes for single birds (cock, cockerel, hen, and pullet) and one class
for exhibition pens, a pen being composed of five specimens, a male
matched according to Standard requirements with four females. The
single-bird classes are also called the ‘‘open classes.” In ‘ducks,
geese, and turkeys the same classification is used, the old and young
of each sex competing separately. In turkeys, and occasionally in
geese, two classes for old birds (particularly males) are made, two-
year-old birds competing separately and all over two years classing
as ‘‘aged”’ birds. In the single classes each bird is judged on its
individual merits in comparison with competitors in the same class.
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 543
In pens the birds are judged collectively, a disqualification on one
bird throwing the whole pen out of competition. It is required that
the females match as closely as possible. The four females are
usually considered as representing half the value of the pen. A
bad practice, common in small shows, is to consider the best male
and the four best females of an exhibitor his ‘‘ exhibition pen”’
and award prizes on these, the pen being selected from the scores
after judging, and existing as a pen only on the score card. This
practice entirely loses sight of the object of giving prizes for pens
of matched birds, which is to put a high premium on uniformity
and stimulate breeders to work for it at every point.
In general, competition in pens has been between birds of any
age. Wherever this is the case, it tends to exclude old cocks from
pen competitions, because a well-developed cockerel can, as a rule,
win over a superior cock by virtue of better condition. Many of
the finest old hens are also excluded for the same reason. The
tendency of the competition of birds of all ages in the same class in
pens is to bring into the exhibition-pen classes the most matured
young birds and those adults which show least signs of age, such
a combination having an advantage, in condition and uniformity of
appearance, over better birds either more or less mature in appear-
ance. On this account some shows are now making separate pen
classes for old and young birds. Another feature at some shows
is special classes for pens mated for breeding in varieties in which
special matings are used. While custom decrees that fowls shall
be shown only singly or in pens, it would be good policy in many
small shows to provide classes for specially mated pairs or trios as
well as of specially mated pens, or instead of the pens if the ex-
hibitor also has birds in the open and regular pen classes. The
stock and judgment of the exhibitor are shown and the principle
of mating illustrated as well with one female as with four.
Arrangement of classes in the showroom. The order of the
arrangement of classes usually follows the order of descriptions in
the Standard, or places the classes systematically according to type.
The latter is the practice at New York and Boston, and at a num-
ber of the leading shows. The Standard arrangement is more gen-
erally used, not because it is better but because it is natural for
inexperienced managers to adopt that order of arrangement, and
POULTRY CULTURE
544
‘paqtiosap jou quod _
" pay puels] apoyy quioy-asoy
a "pam pues, epoyy quied-a[3ulg
"+ + + ayopued Ay uerquintod
Sona qe | iT : ayopues A, papiouag-19Ajis
oa | | ai. ayopuek \\ aSpuqeg
Of | gz | tz PR et sore ss + 8 ayopuekm yng
am nae) zt | tr sor ee ss ayopuekay ORT
SZ | zt | 95 | sf 9f | 18 + anopued yy ay AY
gt | oF | £5 | Lg £o ) €2 * + + + ayopuekay pacey-uapjoy
“of tZ | gf | 0g gs |} 1Z "of + + ayopued ,y paoey-124]I1S
i == “71 poy yours werquinjod
“POM _nowd]g pap}oueg-4aalis
ri ‘oh + yooy YynowA,Y espuyeg
of | 2b | cl | ££ | Sr | ft "oh or ss yooy ynowd,g yng
ot | oF | fg | oF | og | $2 | gZ "+ + + yoo yp ygnowAT AMAL
6€1 | 661 | got | ZZ1 | OSt | PS1 | Sta ‘t+ + y90Xf yInould[g paueg
9 1 9 | gt | 61 | fr ‘ot tos + anbrurwoq uesueury
z £ z | or} z 1 | t1 |] 6 | or | 61 ¢ g {ir ] ez] 19] gt yor os ors ss upyssueTy oy Ay
Ze | €€ | €z | of | te | Ge | OF | Sz | gz | EE | Zo | So | EZ | for | of | 69 Jozt | iki | FFt | on "orf oh os s+ uvyssuey yor
€1 | or | €1 | oz | gi | zf | cz | gz | ZS} gf | fz | gh | Gr | gz | PS | Sh | fh | oF | 1S | oz c+ 6 Fn ee © Ue) DPI AL
SCS Pe pee oe te} St] g | gz] Sz] ar | Zt | €F | zg | oS | of | Sz] gr if ‘+ ulyso09 ye
ot | £1 | &1 | oz | Se [oz | gh | er | at | €S | an | Gf | €€ | oF | eh | ge | zo | ZF | gf | tz oor ee +s yiyse5 aSpuueg
gz | * | 9 | oc | ff] 21 | eg] SP] aS | Fh | OF 99 | oF | 9g | ZEr| ben | 21 | 121 | gor | Lor ieee
“Selee] + | lar] 9 | de} ei | at | 2 | 6 | of | Se | Fe | Zr | Zz | of | or | €€ | Ez ore ee > Burgers ye
to | tg | oS | 99 | €g Jozr| £6 | of1 | cfr | br | #21] gor | of | PEL | gtr | 621 | Coz | £61 | ziz| oz Be * euyeig yysry
OTGET| 60G6T| BOG6T| LOGT| 906T| GOGT| FOGT| EOGT| ZOET| TOGT| OOGT| GEST) SG8T| LEST] 968T| SERT| bEST| E6ST| ZEST! TEST ALTINV A,
o161-16g1 ‘SYVAA ALINAM] WOA
‘ALID MYOR MAN ‘MOHS NadUVy auvaAds NOSIAVIY AHL LV
ISAUALN] IWIOAdG dO SASSVID NI ANV SASSVID IVdIONIYG AHL NI GALIGIHXA AULINOG AO SUAUNWAN “ANY ATAVL
545
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS
ee ee z 9 | ¢ z | 9/8 a1 1 t+ ystog s24t1s papieag
el eae Pope le ee ae z |r} gs u _' Ysl[og uapjoy pepreag
ot | te | zz _9t | OF | az] gi avs “oz | fz lar] 2} + fa | f “gz : Ystog Yoel poyse1-ayty A,
41 | ¢ 4 z 1 ae eed S| area gic oz * ystueds yoe[g paorq-ayty AL
Soiled te ce 1 a oe ee ce ee * + BOJOUT AYA GuI0D-asoy
“6f | 1 | 6 | zz gr “gt eae ee tf] 61. € fa | on zt BIIOUIFL ITY AL QUIOD-a]BUIS
gf | oF | to | gz | OF “tr | g | 6 g | ¢ | or} st fect! ‘ * BOLOUTAL NOEL GuIOD-as0y
06 | zS | #6 | Zz1|oz1| 111 | 62 | 6g | 1S | zg | €g | Gor | Sor | gh | 09 Tee | + BOIOUL, YORI quo-a] Sus
“ez jiz| a | 6 ti fafo] | ie ees oe a: wee + yappaauayey
gaff] | |, Seeil <4 i . > gurdures>
ee lor liz} |r lof2) | |) : a4 ‘+ os + eguoouy
of | iF | oz | zt | gi | ez | Se | ar | € | fe} oz | of | ot | Gr | be gi a ‘+ uetsnjepuy ang
z | f1 9|/S$}ol*tlgels ful [€ ¢ * woyZay yng quioy-as0y
Zit | gg | Z9 | #9 | og | €$ | eZ fear | Of gZ | £9 | €F | 92 | Zor | 1b ¢ ‘+ wloy8ay yng quios-a[8uis
6 | 11] tz | fe )or|] e— ae | 8 rr a uloyday Surmyonq quioy-3]3uis
“g | $ | Ze} te lorlec|! | | | 1 o1 uloydaT yet quios-a[3urs
fr | gt | oz | Z€ | of | oz | €€ | gt [ab lot | Sc | fz | oz | oz | ar Sz * ur0yZaT ay A quiod-asoy
“oie | tir goz | 161, tgz| tot | Pic | ps1 “gor | 12 gg | 29 | SZ | 9g | SF +S * wloysaT oy Ay quiod-a[3uISs
S¢ $ Fiabe ve | FE | iz “Fz. * * wloysaTyT umoig quiod-asoy
; zg | bit| 69 £6 * woyseyT umorg quios-3]3uIs
or Me te > w0yButdig ay A, quiod-ss0y
For] of | fg | re | €Z | £5 | oz | 01 eae * uojZurdig ayy A, quio-a]3uis
“g | or} 9 }orfar|m|g flaicf | uo0yZurdig yxoelg quioj-esoy
FEr| FFL} oot | €€1 | 06 [oor] 2S | Zz | filter * uoyuidig xorg quioD-s/3urs
zt | ti | or | gt | Se | or | 2] + || - + uoySurdig yng quioj-asoy
“gt | gét gor | 191 | Zoz| £21 | Sor | +o | €F | bz fab | Za tral * uowuidig yng quiop-ajsuis
el Pr e jie ioe | s ale [. Pe le fee es fe ] 2h be ee ee: Suryioqd sy At
ge | zz “fz | ez | Zi o1 | 6€ | g | oz] + | tr | ti | &t gf | oz | gf | Zt | Zt | tr | of z * Zuryiog Aein-19ajIs
“21 $ | ¥ S ZL P + + z 9 + £ Go jiur] 9 8 8 6 | 6— gl : * + + Zuryioq pas10foa
ea g ir in ties akayong
OT6T| GO6T) 806T| LOGT| 906T| GOT) FOGT| EOGT! ZOGT| TOGT| OOGT| GERT| SG8T| LEST! 9GST| Q68T| FEST) SEST| ZE8T| TEST
POULTRY CULTURE
546
pz | or | te | te | 26 | of 7 +) wejueg, euryerg, ySrT
“ey ] S| 2 ilérf<z Cilieguile ee [ee | ce * wejueg dy A\ quioD-aso xy
te | fb | 6€ | bz | SE gl 1z | bz | gz | gz. gr Th * wejueg, yoR[q quios-asoy
Zz | zt | oz | iz | if | Fe “Le | of | St | at | 6€ | zz “ * weyueg 3Y48uqasg 1aafIS
of | 61 | oz | 1z | Of | gf 6z | gz | fz | Gr | oz | of | ‘+ wejuRg, 1YydLIgas uaplor
“eZ | 611 | oS | $1 fi | St gtr | £S1] €2Z1 | gq | Gor | €or * * wejueg awey uOnIqIyxa
Sz | ge | te | be | 6 | F 41 | € | a St “ * + gues ueIpUy aity AY
“gf | fz | of | fF | So | GF fz | of | Zo | to | ftir] £6 ‘+ * gues) urrpuy ysiut09
ea) Es panes ge vase pena ¢ ce ee : eo BBaSY
a eae ae feet Le! in & oS a Se + Avery
tir] oS | o£ | of | 26 | EZ ro | wy | Gel gS |] SCP Fe hott oh or os 8 puey wg
“ye | | &r | of | et | zz tr “gor. gfi | zo | oz | Sor 7 oho 8 + gues UuONIqIyxy
“p | * | €€ | or | Se | 2€ as ee cae (ae ee) 5 ‘oh 8 5 + sayporaaey
Aces Ele ee {Ss farl 2 lu : ‘ot * * aypafq eT
rf | eeqoe |e. Gils (Oo does sor or os 8 = nao99aa715
“Lt | 9S | 2 “Li | at | 6€ Fe | of | 20 | Ge | 21. | 2e ‘ot of of 8 ss * uepnoH
6 piste] s g |te{m]i1|2|o ‘ot tor + Sinquiepy yep
z z at ee blog ‘a ZL "of of 8 + Sinqurepzp ay Ay
“EZ; S| | #19] # or | zz} fi | 1 | o1 | gt * Sainquieyy paiouag-saaqis
“9/o9|/+r|]gis |r f1 | Sz | Zz | 61 | oz | Ge * Sinquiey papiousg-uapjoy
ee “gr. “of | Sr gz | 6z 1 | 61, gt} zi | gz | Zz * Sinqwey pa[suedc-1aais
“ef |r] i]s r 6 | tz | & “€ | zn + Sinquey pa[sueds-uapjoxy
2 a ee zi] fzia 6) 1€ "of os os 8 8 + sdey pay
ee | | Ge Por) Sle 3g | 9 8 3 zt "fs + ysyog pase y-yng
ee es gs |9o9}]s]} | |f "_ystod a4 A\ Papreaquon
|. 38 faa ee Qo) ee * -ysod 1aajig papreaquon
ee Ee ee oe g | 9 |-s gt "_ystlOd_waploy papsesquon
a a 4191/9 1-2 " * * Ystod a4 Ay popieag.
OT6T) 6OG6T) 8O6T) LOGT| 9O6T| GOGT| FOGT| EOGT| ZOGT| TOGT| OOGT| CERT] BEBT| LEST] 968T| G68T| FERT| EGRT| ZERT| TEST ALAINVA
(GAANILNOD) AX AMV
547
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS
SS tt 98009 PIM
“98008 eury satu M
‘tot ft tot tt asooy eulyg uMOIg
ak ee ee * + 98005 uvnyy
: = = 7S + = 9g005 uapulaT
‘ot ot ttt tt gsooy asnojnoy,
SO on ysipamg ania
"ot ot fot oo + yong Jouuny uerpuy
‘tot ttt tt yond Aaoosnyw oq
Se ‘tt + -yoncy Aaoosny, par0jog
SO 0 IY AN payserD
SNC RD 2M.
ah Ne ee A Son ED Kai
aki sor ot ot os oss yong eankeg
cos es + yong wanoy
“coh tt tt tt gong Ainqsahy
S19 UPIAT
a et ef SS Aayiny, ayes
. . . . . . . . Aayin y, yong
St Aonany pur yoH OW AL
OR res ‘+ fayiny, zug
oo Gee, "+ + UreyURE Ystog
‘tot tot + + wryueg asourdef
“ot ttt urequeg ulyoo0g youl
Oe ee oe wee UlYyIOD JIT AL
“ot tt wequeg unos adprqeg
"tt ttt urequeg uryso0g yng
aes "ts * urejueg euryeigy xed
é t
OTET| GO6T) SOGT| LOGT) 9DGT| GOGT| FOGT| EOGT| ZOGT) TOGT, OOGT| GE8L| BEST! LEST] 9E8T| GEST] PERT] E6RT| ZERT| TEST
548 POULTRY CULTURE
once adopted at a show it is likely to be continued there. The
arrangement at the leading shows is generally correct, though in
some of the less important classes the system is not observed.! It is
usual to number the single entries of all varieties consecutively, with
the pens of all varieties following in the same order. All shows
accept non-Standard as well as Standard varieties and make classes
for them as soon as the breeders offer entries enough to warrant it.
Unclassified exhibits usually compete with one another in what is
called the ‘““ Any Other Variety,” or “A. O. V.,” class. In this
case birds are not actually judged in competition, but prizes are
awarded to the most meritorious birds in the class.2_ Exhibition
pens are usually placed in the best location in the hall, with wide
aisles between the rows of coops, because they attract the attention
of sight-seeing visitors more than do the birds in the open classes.
Sweepstakes prizes. Prizes for which different varieties com-
pete are not now as generally offered as was the custom some
years ago. To the inexperienced manager they seem a good
thing. The experienced manager has learned that there is noth-
ing connected with the showing of poultry so certain to cause dis-
putes and hard feeling among exhibitors, and to make trouble for
him, as a sweepstakes prize. Persons offering liberal special prizes
often wish to make them sweepstakes prizes. It is much better
to give the prizes on a single variety or breed, or to divide them
into smaller prizes to be offered in that way.
Special exhibits. Noncompetitive displays in extra large sepa-
rate coops are most attractive to the general public. The adver-
tising value of such displays to the exhibitor is so great that, as
a matter of business policy, the management of a show usually
gives the preference, in renting display coops, to exhibitors making
large entries in competitive classes. At small shows where there
1 The order of arrangement at the Madison Square Garden (New York) show
is most interesting, because it has furnished the general plan for the arrangement
of first-class shows, has carried out its plan more consistently than any other, has
been scientific in the general arrangement of types, and, in placing the varieties
of the different breeds, has kept them in the chronological order of their intro-
duction to the public.
2 Tt is worth noting in this connection that the attitude of the shows toward
the multiplication of breeds and varieties is just the opposite of that of the
American Poultry Association. The shows encourage the making of new vari-
eties and give the promoters every facility for exploiting them.
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 549
€
is room to spare, exhibitors are still often allowed to place in “‘ sale
classes” any stock they choose, and sell from these for immediate
delivery ; but as shows increase in number of entries, this leads to
many abuses, and furnishes opportunities for evasions of the neces-
sary rule that exhibits must not be removed until the close of the
show. If authorized to do so and given a fixed price, show associ-
ations usually undertake to sell exhibits on commission for exhibi-
tors not in attendance. An exhibitor giving a price on a bird
entered thereby authorizes the association to sell the bird at that
price, and according to custom the association is obliged to sell
the bird at the catalogue price to the first person who claims it
and pays the money down.
Balancing exhibits. Balancing the exhibits of poultry to add
to the general attractiveness of the show is a matter to which the
experienced show manager gives a great deal of attention, often
going so far as to offer liberal rebates on entry fees to exhibitors
who will send varied exhibits of rare specimens of good quality.
The manager of a small show has no inducements to give to the
professional exhibitors of the rare and odd varieties that interest
the general public more than the classes in which competition is
keen, but he ought to make special efforts to get entries (if only
one or two specimens) from breeders of all varieties and all kinds
of poultry in which there is little interest. In the absence of better
quality any specimen that will pass for a representative of an
established variety helps to fill out and balance a poultry show.
Practical exhibits. Dressed-poultry and egg competitions inter-
est the ordinary visitor to a poultry show more than the live birds,
because every one feels that he is something of a judge of merit
in food products. Exhibits of this class are much harder to get
than exhibits of fancy live poultry, not only because poultry shows
are mostly held at the season least favorable for making displays
of this kind, but because most of the exhibitors are not especially
interested in these lines, and because winning prizes on eggs and
dressed poultry at a poultry show does not give an exhibitor such
advantage over other producers as does winning prizes on Standard-
bred birds. No competitive dressed-poultry and egg exhibits of
any importance have ever been made in America, except in a few
cases where state and provincial governments have given liberal
550 POULTRY CULTURE
prizes and no entry fees have been charged. With a little effort
directed especially in that direction egg competitions among ex-
hibitors of live poultry might be developed in any small show.
Something, too, may be done with dressed poultry through codper-
ation with poultrymen dressing considerable quantities of it, or
with nonproducing local dealers. In either case the exhibits would
come in as noncompetitive displays, on practically the same footing
as displays of incubators, brooders, and poultry supplies. Under
existing conditions this seems the best way to treat this class of
produce in most small shows.
Combination shows. Combining exhibits of other stock with
poultry shows to attract larger attendance is the rule in all large
shows and many small ones. Pigeons, pet stock, cats, and some-
times dogs are exhibited with poultry. A cat department will attract
more people who would not otherwise attend the show than any of
the others mentioned. Pigeons and pet stock are usually a loss to
the management, but the departments are maintained to add to the
variety, on the same principle that exhibits of nonpopular kinds of
poultry are specially solicited. There is a growing feeling in regard
to all these side shows that, with popular development of the exhibi-
tion possibilities of poultry, they might well be dispensed with.
Mercantile exhibits. Displays of poultry supplies have become
a very important feature in all the larger poultry shows, are often
found in small shows, and are everywhere one of the most popular
features of a show. Incubators hatching and little chicks or duck-
lings in brooders interest all classes of visitors, and an extended
array of poultry appliances and supplies will hold the attention of
many poultry keepers long after they have tired of looking at the
birds. These displays are usually made by local dealers, and by
inventors of appliances who wish to exploit a particular article.
Suggestions for improving appearance of regular displays. The
most marked feature of poultry shows is sameness in the method of
displaying exhibits. The breaking up of the display of an exhibitor
to bring together specimens which are to compete in the same class
makes impossible any general effort to beautify the displays by
appropriate setting or decoration, or to give any special character
to an exhibit. A few exhibitors decorate their coops, especially
coops of birds winning important prizes after ‘the awards are up,
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 551
but most of the coops are bare except for the entry number, a rib-
bon if the bird has won a place, and perhaps the card of the owner.
The rule prohibiting distinctive marks on coops ought everywhere
to be abolished. If this were done, and a uniform style of combina-
tion shipping and exhibition coop adopted (in standard sizes appro-
priate for the various sizes of birds and classes), and exhibitors
required to furnish their own coops and allowed to decorate them
as they saw fit, the regular competitive exhibits at shows would
soon become more attractive; for much can be done, in the way of
showing off birds, by the very simple device of painting the back
and sides of coops in shades which contrast effectively with the
colors of the birds.! At most small shows, exhibitors furnish their
own coops, and such shows might well inaugurate the practice of
using a standard style of individual coop and making efforts to dis-
play each variety separately. This method of cooping would also
make it practicable to carry out a suggestion often made by exhib-
itors that, after judging, the birds in a class be arranged in order of
merit, thus enabling every one to make direct comparisons.
Ring judging, a common practice in live-stock shows and in
the pigeon departments of poultry shows, may easily be made an
attractive feature of judging in small shows, though conditions in
the larger shows often prohibit it. In this form of judging, the
competing specimens are displayed and judged by classes, on a
large table before the audience, each specimen being in charge
of its owner or attendant. The practice has been used in a few
poultry shows with satisfactory results.
Suggestions for special displays. A statement of a few of the
special poultry displays that have proved very attractive to visitors
will indicate something of the possibilities of development of this
line of attractions.
An exhibitor showed a Barred Plymouth Rock cock and hen with
over a hundred chicks hatched from her eggs in the preceding season.
1 This would not be the only advantage of the exhibitor owning his own coops
and using them atall shows, large as well as small. There would be no handling
of the birds in transferring from the shipping to the exhibition coop and back
again at the close of the show, and less opportunity for birds to get lost. The
responsibility of keeping his coops clean and sanitary would rest with the exhib-
itor, and he would not, as now, run the risk of having his birds placed in exhibition
coops that have been occupied by diseased specimens from other flocks.
ee POULTRY CULTURE
People came in crowds to see the sight. It was a drawing card for
the show, the best of advertising for the exhibitor, and an instructive
exhibit. A much smaller family than this could be used as a feature.
Persons crossing varieties of poultry often get some very inter-
esting results. Exhibits of crossbred birds presenting striking char-
acteristics (either of uniformity or of dissimilarity) always attract
attention, especially if the parents are exhibited with them.
Breeders of established varieties often experiment with them,
trying to modify the type as to a single character. In nearly all
breeds heavyweight strains are made occasionally, and are always
of interest to many persons. New color patterns and new types of
comb in breeds are often developed by breeders, and are always of
passing interest as exhibits, though they may not take with the
public. Many such modifications have been worked out again and
again by different breeders in different localities.
Competitions for children may be very effectively used, both to
add to the interest of a show and to increase the interest in poultry
in the community.
Models of appliances in use by local poultrymen, particularly of
homemade appliances devised by them, could be made an inter-
esting feature in small shows.
Collections of such poultry literature as breeders’ catalogues,
supply catalogues, poultry journals, Experiment Station and United
States government bulletins are easily made, and when well
arranged, add materially to the interest and attractiveness of the
show. Good collections of poultry books can often be made by
combining the poultry libraries of local poultrymen. Anything
that would be of interest in a poultryman’s yard or home will be
of interest in a show. Working up such accessory exhibits usually
takes more time than those looking after the competitive exhibits
can give. For that reason it ought to be in the hands of a special
committee or of an assistant secretary.
Institutes at poultry shows. Lectures may be made an attractive
feature at small shows. Indeed, they are very much better adapted
to small shows than to large ones, where the crowds, the confusion,
and the din make it hard for speakers to talk, except to small groups.
Many of the poultry judges are very acceptable lecturers on both
practical and fancy topics. In some states it is possible for the
POULTRY EXHIBITIONS 553
managers of a poultry exhibition, by codperating with a local agri-
cultural society or by direct application to the state department of
agriculture, to arrange for lectures to be given at the show under
the auspices of the agricultural department, in which case speakers
furnished by the department are paid by the state. If an associa-
tion has to provide speakers for its institute, it can often get a very
acceptable lecture, talk, or paper from some of its members, or from
persons in near-by towns, at very moderate cost. Institute work
should be a feature of every show where conditions admit, and
every effort should be made to use local poultry keepers in this line
of work, if only for five-minute talks.
College poultry exhibitions. Poultry exhibitions at agricultural
colleges and schools call for special mention. It is not generally
practicable to make them competitive in the same sense as the
ordinary exhibition. The show is made for the students, the
object being to bring together a larger collection and a greater
variety of poultry than could be maintained for practice at the
college or school plant, and to give the students practice both in
judging and in the management of a poultry show. Shows of this
class are rarely so located that they can be made an attraction to
the sight-seeing public, but as they are not under expense for hall
rent, that is not a serious matter. The logical development of these
shows is along the line of closer correlation with the work of grad-
uates of the poultry courses. The poultry show of one year should
be made up, in part, of the exhibits of students in previous years,
and exhibits of results of their work with poultry, with full reports
on conditions and methods of production, should be required of
students seeking the fullest recognition of accomplishment that the
institution can give. While college shows are for the most part
insignificant at present, it is very plain that if they are so developed
that even a small proportion of the students of each class retain
their interest in the college exhibition after leaving the institution,
they will ultimately become large affairs, controlled by the techni-
cally educated poultry keepers of the state, and of great educa-
tional importance. In the agricultural college and school, more than
anywhere else, the conditions favor continuity and permanence of
exhibitions and the full development of the educational possibilities
of the poultry show.
CHAPTER XXVIII
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY
Selecting specimens for exhibition. The selection and the prep-
aration of poultry for exhibition are practically simultaneous proc-
esses. Special attention to the condition of the bird usually follows
its tentative selection as one of those to be exhibited, but final selec-
tion depends on whether the specimen will be in show condition
at the required time or can be kept in such condition if it reaches
that stage of development too early for the show at which the
owner wishes to exhibit it. A novice in showing poultry usually
begins to select and prepare his birds for exhibition a few days, or
at most a few weeks, before he intends to exhibit them. Almost
invariably he finds then many faults of condition —as lack of
weight, dead and broken feathers, scaly legs, etc. — which might
have been corrected had they been taken in time, but which now
make it inadvisable to show the birds. One of the most important
points in working up a new local show is to direct the attention of
prospective amateur exhibitors to this matter in time. This can
only be done effectively by going to their yards and looking over
their stock with them.
An expert exhibitor is selecting and preparing his exhibition
birds from the time they are hatched. He notes certain birds as
suitable for exhibition as young birds, and certain others as not
qualified to compete as young birds but likely to be in good
exhibition form as old birds. As nearly all birds fade somewhat
with age, in cases where strength of color is a fault in the young
bird the natural fading with age may make the bird of the Standard
color in its second or third year, and so give it a great advantage over
birds of the same age which were of the Standard color when young.
Thus females of the ermine type, with so much black in the backs
that as pullets they would be disqualified if exhibited, often molt
this out and make the finest exhibition hens. Such birds, when
they come free from disqualifications late in life, are peculiarly
554
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY kee
valuable for exhibition purposes, for a bird of undoubted age which
does not require the customary allowance for deterioration due to
age deprives all competitors of the benefit of such allowance. The
same thing is true in regard to the condition and development of
young birds. Whenever a bird that is unmistakably young, but
as well developed as an old bird, appears in a class of average
young birds, they lose (in competition with it) the benefits of the
usual allowances for immaturity.
In large measure, success in exhibiting poultry depends upon
having specimens just right for the shows at which they are to be
exhibited. Inexperienced exhibitors often inadvertently get the
benefit of this without actually appreciating it. The seasoned ex-
hibitor plans for it. He has learned that the plumage of a bird is
at its best for only a very brief period after completing its growth ;
that pullets begin to go off in condition after laying; that both
young and old birds may fail to properly molt a part of their
feathers, so that the old dead feathers, mixed with the live ones,
greatly detract from the appearance of the bird; and that there
are numerous other little things affecting the preparation of poultry
for exhibition, — and he looks after all these points.
Conditioning exhibition poultry. The natural conditioning of
birds for exhibition is a continuous process. The expert exhibitor
not only plans to have birds developed at a certain time, but grows
them under conditions which, as far as possible, insure freedom
from faults which can be prevented by giving the birds a favor-
able environment and a proper diet. All that has been said of
the advantage of natural conditions in growing poultry for mar-
ket and egg production applies with added emphasis to the grow-
ing of stock for exhibition purposes. Bad conditions, lack of
range, overcrowding, and improper diet while the stock is growing
are the causes of lack of size and weight, and also of poor form
and of color defects as the birds approached maturity. While
occasionally a back-yard fancier giving close attention to every
detail produces specimens that can hold their own in any competi-
tion, as a rule the finest specimens are grown where the range is
more than ample and the food always in full supply, and where
the birds frequent sun or shade at will. Under such circumstances
the characters of an individual develop in their finest form ; it
556 POULTRY CULTURE
grows to full size, it is symmetrical, and it is not so likely to
develop faults in the line of weakness of color as when conditions
are less favorable. Birds grown under such favorable conditions are
often taken right from the range to the showroom, and if they are
not shy, and take kindly to show conditions, they are the most
attractive birds seen in the shows.
Birds which are intended for the winter shows, and must be
kept housed for several weeks or months before being exhibited,
require most careful handling. With fowls the males need special
attention and, as far as possible, separate quarters for each bird ;
for when a number are running together after reaching sexual matu-
rity, only the “boss’’ of the lot develops fully ; the others are
cowed and worried and, though full fed, will not shape up and fill
out as a cockerel does when master of his companions. Whenever
it can be done, each male intended for exhibition should be housed
with a pen of hens or pullets that are not laying, or not laying
heavily, or if the special quarters provided for fitting males for ex-
hibition are large enough, from one to three hens should be kept
with each male. These should be hens not intended for exhibition.
The best fitting pens are pens on the floor, from four to six feet
square ; in these, hens may be kept with the males. When movable
exhibition coops or permanent coops of similar size and construction
are used, it is better not to put more than one bird of either sex in
acoop. The pen on the floor is in every way the best, especially if
the birds are to remain there for some time. When it is desirable
or necessary to handle the bird frequently, small coops are suitable
only for a short period before showing. Females that are being
fitted for exhibition need not be kept separate. Those to be shown
together in pens should be together, if possible, for some weeks be-
fore being shown. In any case the number kept together should
be small, not more than six or eight, that there may be no crowding
in any way. Crowding when feeding or drinking, or on the roost,
or when dusting, always causes more or less damage to plumage,
and often leads to quarrels in which combs and ear lobes are per-
manently damaged. The clear, enameled surface of a white ear lobe
is spoiled if the lobe is injured. A small piece may be taken from
a comb in a fight, or a wattle torn and permanently damaged. A
common cause of injuries to combs is the wire netting so much
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY 557
used about poultry houses and yards. The absence of spikes on
many rose combs, and of points on single combs, is due to their
accidental removal by wire. To guard against this, cotton fish net-
ting may be used in place of wire where valuable birds are kept.
It is of prime importance that birds be kept free from lice when
growing the plumage in which they are to be exhibited. Lice not
only sap the vitality of the birds, and so cause general deterioration
of the color of the plumage, but some kinds gnaw the growing
feather next the skin as it emerges from the sheath, damaging
the web. It is much better that the birds have ample opportunities
to keep themselves free from lice than that the poultryman try to
do it by frequent applications of insecticides.
For all clean-legged birds a floor littered six or eight inches deep
with clean, quite long oat straw, or with leaves, should be provided,
and unless it is necessary to force feeding to complete growth, or
to make the desired weight within the time limit, they should be
fed principally on hard grains, in variety, scattered in this litter.
Working in it cleans and polishes both plumage and legs. Feather-
legged fowls, on the other hand, must be kept from scratching
while their exhibition plumage is growing,! for if they are not,
the foot feathering is likely to be kept worn off quite close to the
outer toe. Floors for them may be lightly littered with short cut
straw or with hay, leaves, or planer shavings. They should be
fed largely on hard grain. To birds of any kind deficient in weight,
corn should be fed liberally, and some moist mash may also be
given. Many exhibitors, when preparing birds to be cooped by a
company which feeds its special brands of poultry foods during the
show, use those foods for a part of the ration for a week or two pre-
ceding the show, that the birds may not be affected by a sudden
change of diet.
Grooming and faking. Artificial methods of conditioning poultry
for exhibition are of two distinct classes, — legttimate and illegiti-
mate (faking) ; between these two classes are a number of cases the
status of which is not clear.
Legitimate conditioning (practices that are plainly right) includes
all those things which the exhibitor must do to birds individually
1 This is one of the principal causes of the loss of vitality in exhibition stock
of this general type.
558 POULTRY CULTURE
to have them in their best natural condition when shown. It is un-
questionably proper for a poultry keeper to remove dead or broken
feathers so that new ones may grow before the bird is shown, to
feed to promote growth or to increase weight, to wash a bird to
remove dirt, and to clean scaly legs.
Illegitimate methods (practices commonly considered plainly
wrong) are performing surgical operations to remedy defects of
head parts, removing feathers from shanks and plugging holes
left by the removal of feathers, splicing and trimming feathers,
dyeing or staining the plumage and legs, and bleaching white
plumage with chemicals, — things which materially alter conspic-
uous characters.
Debatable methods of most importance are removing defective
feathers in the soft plumage, removing small stubs and down from
smooth-legged fowls, and washing white birds with weak chemical
solutions. In the same category, though little discussed, is the
practice, very general among expert exhibitors, of removing feathers
not conspicuously defective (when their removal will improve the
general color pattern) and of plucking main tail feathers (when the
new feathers will make the tail of the desired length and shape
at the time the bird is shown), and the removal of fine stubs and
down from the legs and feet of birds of clean-legged varieties.
For all of these practices there is a larger measure of justifica-
tion than can be found for plain faking, yet the difference is
generally one of degree, not of kind; and in the final analysis the
difference between legitimate and illegitimate methods of fitting
fowls for exhibition is tersely expressed in the cynical maxim
“ Faking is faking only when it is found out.” Though not morally
beautiful, that sentiment is materially correct. A rigid observance
of the rule that fowls must be shown in “ natural condition ’’ would
require a higher code of ethics in the poultry show than is found
anywhere. Among experienced exhibitors the use of the debatable
forms of conditioning is general.
Those whose scruples will not allow them to follow custom
refrain from exhibiting, because under a strict application of the
rule the number of specimens which can be shown with any chance
of winning is so small that it is not worth while to make an ex-
hibit exclusively of such specimens at any place where competition
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY 559
compels close scrutiny of the birds. These debatable practices are
commonly used by fanciers who will not use any of the “ rank”
forms of faking. They are justified by them on these grounds :
(1) that the rule as it applies to things not detectable is, and always
must be, a dead letter; 1 (2) that the rule is too strict, — does
not give due consideration to the difficulties of securing absolute
conformity to type and would too severely punish trivial faults ;
(3) that the practices do not in any way mar the appearance of
the specimen, but distinctly improve it; (4) that they consist (ex-
cept as to washing white birds) in removing defects individually
so insignificant that their removal leaves no trace, and that there
is no difference in effect between washing white birds with mild
chemical solutions and washing them several times with a solution
of soap and water.
Exhibitors’ practice in conditioning. The commonly approved
rule of practice in artificial fitting of exhibition birds is to draw the
line on things that may be easily detected, or on compound proc-
esses. The basis of this rule is not the desire to escape detection,
for every experienced exhibitor assumes that every other experi-
enced exhibitor follows the rule. The rule simply establishes the
most convenient line of division between what is and what is not
permissible in practice in regard to the removal of defects which
are in themselves alike. The rule is based not on the similarity of
the defects but on the differences in the effects of removing them,
or in methods of dealing with them if allowed to remain.
Note. The removal, from the body of a white fowl, of forty or fifty
feathers slightly ticked or splashed with black would not perceptibly affect
the outline of the bird, would improve its appearance, and (unless a great
many of them happened to be close together) could not be detected ; the re-
moval of one such feather from the wing would at once be apparent. So ina
black fowl, many feathers showing some white may be removed from the body
without the fact being discovered; a gray tip on a wing feather cannot be
removed without showing the loss or mutilation of the feather. It is an im-
portant feather. The defect might be remedied by dyeing, — by adding somc-
thing. This, by common consent, the mass.of exhibitors refrain from doing, not
merely because the feather is important, but because the treatment adds some-
thing. The removal of a few very small stubs and bits of down is considered
1 It is natural to ask, Why, then, is it not changed? The best answer is found in
the great number of provisions of municipal state and national laws that are neither
enforced nor repealed.
560 POULTRY CULTURE
justifiable when removal alone will serve, but not when the stubs are numerous
or so large that, to conceal the fact of their removal, the holes must be plugged.
The use of chemicals in washing birds is considered permissible if they are
not of such strength as to injure the texture of the feather; that is, they may
be used in such moderate quantities as would be safe in washing white clothes.
The removal of feathers not in themselves defective, to improve the general pat-
tern, has generally been considered unquestionably allowable when the removal
of defective feathers is condoned. The regulation of the growth of the tail to
bring the desired stage of development at the time when the bird is to be
shown has generally been regarded as belonging more to natural than to artificial
conditioning, and justified on the ground that the object and the result were
to show the bird at its best.
Ethics of conditioning. The evil of the artificial manipulation of
poultry for exhibition, while often serious in particular cases, is,
on the whole, much less than one would suppose could be the
case when principles of importance are involved. Exhibitors fol-
lowing the same general rule are practically competing on terms
of equality, for in birds of any variety that are nearly the same in
quality the common removable faults are much the same both in
kind and in extent. A bird of poor quality cannot be made good by
any form of manipulation, either legitimate or illegitimate. Arti-
ficial conditioning and fitting of inferior specimens is a waste of
time and always unprofitable. In practice artificial fitting is wholly
a matter of remedying relatively insignificant defects in specimens
of extra good general quality.
The greater evil is in the actual or implied suppression of facts
as to the faults of stock when the birds themselves, or eggs from
them, go into the hands of other breeders. While to exhibitors
whose competing birds are judged on their general quality or ex-
cellence it makes no real difference what the particular removed
faults of any kind may be, to the breeder it may make a great
deal of difference. He is entitled to know what he is buying and
to have full opportunity to use his own judgment as to the advisa-
bility of buying stock with certain faults. This phase of the question
comes properly in the chapter on trade in pure-bred poultry, and
will be discussed there.
Details of artificial fitting. The removal of dead, broken, and
otherwise defective feathers is the first thing requiring special
attention. Adult birds should be carefully examined for these from
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY 561
two and a half to three months before they are to be exhibited.
Old cocks are the most troublesome in respect to defective molting
and broken feathers, but heavy-laying hens are sometimes as bad.
A bird that has hardly begun to molt at this time may as well be
dismissed from consideration for exhibit at the show for which it
was to be fitted, unless the show is a very early one at which most
of the adults will not be fully molted. Molting may sometimes be
accelerated by starving for a period and then feeding heavily, but
such practices are likely to be in some measure injurious to the
birds, and results are not uniform. If a bird has partly molted but
has many dead feathers, they should not be removed all at once,
but taken a few a day until all are out. Defective feathers of all
kinds may be removed at this time, even by the most conscien-
tious exhibitor, for the same defects do not always reappear in the
same feathers, and a good feather may grow in place of a bad one.
‘The weight and condition of the bird should also be carefully con-
sidered, and its diet and habits of life during the conditioning
period should be adapted to getting it in perfect condition for the
show. If it is under weight it should be fed all it will stand, yet
with care to avoid overfeeding. If it is over weight it should be
kept on a light diet. In either case the object should be to avoid
radical measures and to bring it gradually to the desired condition.
The next most important point is to look after the condition of
the feet, and if they are affected with scaly leg, corns, or bumble-
foot, to treat these troubles at once, for they are all slowly cured,
and the sooner the cure is effected, the better condition the bird
will be in when shown. Foot troubles are not only in themselves
serious, but affect the general condition and carriage of the bird.
Bumblefoot and corns are sometimes very stubborn. Scaly leg, if
not too far advanced, is easily cured but takes time. There may
be some excuse for showing birds with the first two troubles, but
there is none whatever for scaly leg.
With proper attention given to the points mentioned, no other
artificial fitting is necessary until just before the show.
Finishing touches in fitting birds for exhibition. Final prepara-
tion for exhibition may require only a few hours just before ship-
ping, or it may take a little time daily for several days or weeks.
If dead and broken feathers have been removed at the right time,
562 POULTRY CULTURE
bad feet put in proper condition, and the bird brought to the desired
weight and permitted to keep itself clean, the fitting of a colored
specimen consists only in training it for handling and for the
exhibition coop, giving it a thorough examination for removable
defects, and deciding finally whether it will be shown. White birds
must also be washed.
Training. Birds vary greatly in adaptability to showing. Some
are easily handled, and even if not handled at all while growing,
when cooped become as docile in a few days as if they had been
handled all their lives; others never handle well, though the ex-
hibitor works patiently with them for weeks. Some that handle
well at home do not take at all kindly to showroom conditions.
In general, however, fowls handled for a few moments daily for a
week or two will become as docile as necessary. Other kinds of
poultry do not handle so well, but all kinds, if accustomed to being
handled and to being held in various positions have, when judged,
an advantage over birds that are not ‘‘coop broken.’’ The birds
should be trained to stand in various positions in the coop, and
also on a stand or table outside of it. Particular attention should
be given to the carriage of the wings and tail, and if either is un-
satisfactory, persistent posing of the bird with the part adjusted
as desired may teach it to stand, when the judge poses it, in the
attitude in which it will show to best advantage.
Picking. Jf small removable defects are to be removed, it is
done just before the birds are shipped. Experienced exhibitors go
over all birds very carefully for such faults, and to remove un-
desirable feathers not seriously defective. Of the thoroughness of
the examination which the expert exhibitor makes for this class of
faults, the novice rarely has any conception. An hour and a half
or two hours is required to pick a specimen that is comparatively
free from defective feathers, or in which they are easily detected,
while some specimens take half a day. Against such painstaking
attention to every detail of fitting, the novice who looks over a
bird in a few moments has no chance. The most troublesome of
all the removable faults is down on the shanks and between the
toes. No variety of fowl is free from this fault. In the angle be-
tween the toes, and on the upper side of the foot, it often escapes
notice, even when a careful examination is made of the outer side
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY 563
of the shank. It is quite well established, too, that down may
develop and become visible within from twelve to eighteen hours
after a thorough examination failed to find any. The heat of the
showroom is supposed to be the cause of such quick development
of down,
Cleaning the legs and feet to remove dirt in the wrinkles of the
skin and under the edges of the scales is always necessary. The
parts should be washed first with castile soap and warm water,
scrubbing them with a toothbrush or a nailbrush. After washing,
any dirt showing under the edges of the scales may be removed
with the point of a wooden toothpick. The legs, when thoroughly
cleaned and dried, should be well rubbed with cottonseed oil or
sweet oil, rubbing the oil in until none is left on the surface to
catch dust.
Washing white birds is now so universally practiced that it is
useless to put unwashed white specimens in a show unless the
exhibitor is sure that no well-washed birds will be there. White
birds to be exhibited should not be washed until shortly before ship-
ment. An exhibitor who has had no experience in washing birds
should begin weeks before the show to practice on cull specimens,
and be sure before he tries with a good one that he can do the
work in such a manner that the specimen will not look worse after
his washing than it did before. There is a knack in washing so as
to thoroughly cleanse the feathers without mussing them up. That
part of the operation cannot be described. Some persons seem
naturally to handle the bird and maniputate the feathers right ;
others never acquire the knack; most are awkward at first, but with
practice attain some skill. The washing must be done in a warm
room (85° to 90°), and everything must be in readiness before the
work begins. Three or four tubs are required. The bird is first
thoroughly soaped and lathered in a tub of warm water, then
rinsed in a tub of lukewarm water, then in one of cold water, and
sometimes through another tub of cold water. After washing, the
rinsing must remove every trace of soap. The bird is dried in
the same room, in a clean coop, with clean litter in the bottom,
the room being gradually cooled to about 70°.
Shipment to shows. For shipping birds to shows many fanciers
use the ordinary light shipping coops used by poultrymen for
564 POULTRY CULTURE
shipping birds to customers. These answer very well if only a few
birds are to be shipped each season. Exhibitors who send strings
of birds to a number of shows each year often have substantial
compartment coops made, with two, three, four, or more com-
partments for single birds. Even birds that are to be shown
together are better shipped separately. The plumage is not then
in danger of being damaged or soiled by other birds in transit.
For a local show,-when the exhibitor has control of the means of
transportation, it is well to keep birds at home as late as possible.
If they are to be shipped by rail the shipment should be timed to
arrive at the earliest hour at which entries are received. Then if
there is delay, they may still be in time. If shipments are held
back and timed to arrive at the last moment at which they will be
received, and delay occurs, they may not reach the show in time
to be judged with their class.
Care of poultry at shows. An exhibitor ought always to look
after his own birds at a show, or engage some one on whom he
can rely to look after them. Show associations look after exhibits
in a general way; they feed and water the birds impartially, clean
the coops, and if a bird is sick, remove it. Those birds attended
by owners or others who will take special care of them have a
great advantage over competing birds looked after by the show
attendants. An exhibitor, or his attendant, should see that his
birds are not cooped in a draft or too near steam pipes. If birds
are placed in such positions and cannot be moved, he should take
proper measures to screen them from heat, or from cold-air cur-
rents. So far as the birds are concerned, a cold hall is much better
than a heated one. If the hall is overheated, or the birds are in
too warm a place, their combs may grow considerably, and if large,
lop badly. Birds will keep in much better condition through a
long show if not full fed on grain and if given a little meat and
green stuff daily. Most experienced exhibitors prefer to feed their
own birds, and thus be sure that they are regularly fed and not
overfed. A bird in a coop, with nothing to do, will stuff itself with
food if it has the opportunity.
Returning birds from shows. If the usual quarters of the poultry
are cold, and the showroom has been heated, it is often better
(especially in very cold weather) to leave the birds there for a day
FITTING AND EXHIBITING POULTRY 565
or two with the heat turned off than to take them home at once.
If the exhibits must be removed promptly at the close of the show,
and the weather is very cold, it may be advisable to keep the birds
cooped in a place where the temperature is moderate, for a few
days before placing in their regular quarters. As in the special
fitting, showing, and transportation they will usually have been
quite closely confined for from one to two weeks, and are likely
to be a little soft and out of condition, it is a good plan to give
them well-littered scratching floors, and feed only hard grain for
a while. They should be quarantined until sufficient time has
elapsed for the development of any disease to which they may
have been exposed.
CHAPTER XXIX
JUDGING
Judging defined. Judging poultry and poultry products is esti-
mating their value according to commonly accepted standards of
quality. The quality value of a thing and its money value are not
correlated, though the prices of different grades of goods (as of
eggs, dressed poultry, and exhibition stock) at any time and place
should (and generally do) vary as the qualities of the grades. What
are called qualities are attributes of the thing itself; money value
is determined by many external factors. Of two fresh eggs, iden-
tical in every quality, one, in Kansas or Texas, may be worth two
cents, the other, in Boston or New York, worth five cents. The
unknown novice who happens to produce a bird of surpassing
merit may congratulate himself on disposing of it for five, ten, or
fifteen dollars. The same bird, in the hands of a breeder of wide
reputation, may bring ten times as much. In judging poultry and
its products, money value is not considered at all, though in selling
them, prices may be adjusted to quality. In judging pure-bred poul-
try for external qualities the standards used are those adopted by
the American Poultry Association or, in case of non-Standard vari-
eties, those adopted by specialty clubs or agreed upon by the breeders.
In judging eggs and dressed poultry on exhibition the standards
are determined by market requirements and preferences, and are,
for the most part, unwritten standards, their specifications, when
printed, being in general terms and not specific as to details, as
in standards for fancy poultry.
Objects of judging. The objects of judging are (1) to determine
the relative quality of specimens exhibited in competition, (2) to
determine (with or without competition) their approximate value
as compared with an assumed ideal, or perfect, standard, and
(3) to give training in observation and analysis of characters,
perception of types, etc.
566
JUDGING 567
Methods of judging. For determination of the relative general
quality of a limited number of specimens, or of particular quality
in few or many specimens, comparison is the natural, simple method.
In an exhibition where all that is required is to select and rank
the few best specimens in each class this method may be sufficient.
If classes are large and competition close, it may be so difficult to
decide, by observation alone, comparisons involving many charac-
ters, that the judge adopts some simple system of marking birds as
he examines them, and uses these records to assist him in reach-
ing his final conclusions. From this method of marking for quality
is developed the system of judging by score card, now in common
use for judging many things.
Scoring is merely a mode of comparison which may be described
as formal comparison, with registration of estimated values of
parts as compared.
Whichever method is used, the actual standard of comparison is
the perfect form of each character as the mind of the judge sees it.
In judging, each character is considered separately, though an
expert judge may make his observations so rapidly that he really
considers a number of related characters collectively. When the
number of particular characters is small, a score card may provide
for specific records of the estimate of the value of each. When
the number of characters to be considered is large, as it is in
judging poultry on external points, a card providing for specific
records of estimates of all characters is too elaborate for ordinary
use, and, to simplify the process of recording the score, parts are
grouped in sections, and all their qualities considered and their
values recorded together.
Note. Theoretically, scoring (including comparison and the making of the
record) consists in deducting from 100, taken as the symbol of perfection, a
specific amount for each fault noted, the difference between 100 and the total
amount to be deducted giving the score of the specimen.
On the erroneous assumption that the arbitrary symbol roo is an expression
of actual value in the thing judged, the sections in which characters are grouped
have been assigned numerical values, the allotments being in every case so dis-
tributed that the aggregate of “ points” gives the total 100. Standard scales
of points are variable both as to the numbers of sections and as to the numer-
ical values allotted to them. The scales of points in the Standard of Perfection
are arranged on the theory that sections may differ in relative value in the
568 POULTRY CULTURE
same class or breed, and that corresponding sections may differ in value in
different breeds and classes. If this principle is admitted, it opens the way
for indefinite variation and confusing multiplicity in scales of points. That is
exactly what has taken place. The Standard of Perfection specifies more than
twenty different scales of points. In the decimal system of scoring, the num-
ber of sections is fixed at ten, and each allotted ten points, —the same for
all kinds, classes, and breeds of poultry. Theoretically the decimal system is
very much simpler than the other; actually the two systems are almost identical
both in process and results, because the specific cuts are the same and the
mathematical symbol of perfection the same. A slight difference in results may
occur quite regularly, because the number of sections is less in the decimal
system, and the number of specific cuts is consequently less. This would make
no difference if, where sections are combined in the decimal system, the ordi-
nary cuts are increased proportionately, but with the common practice of
making the same specific cut for the same estimated degree of defect in each
section, the general result of reducing the number of sections is to reduce the
number and total value of cuts, and so to increase slightly the score of birds
judged by the decimal system.
On the theory that scoring consists in deducting, from the number of points
assigned to a section, the percentage of fault in that section, it has been gener-
ally assumed that the scale of points was a prime factor in score-card judging.
The fallacy of this becomes apparent when we turn from the theories of scoring
and consider what it is in fact. Scoring consists simply in making specific cuts
for defects. The cuts usually made are }, 1, and 14, but occasionally cuts of
2 and, more rarely, 24 and 3 are made, That these cuts are specific and do
not represent carefully computed percentages any one may demonstrate for
himself by taking a few score cards of different breeds, made out by a com-
petent judge, and computing the percentages which would give the same specific
cuts in the corresponding sections in different varieties. A demonstration of
this kind will show very plainly that the ordinary cuts, J, 1, 14, are simply
convenient symbols for indicating three grades of moderate defects, and the
extraordinary cuts, 2, 24, 3, symbols for indicating grosser defects.
Percentage as applied to things not measured by an absolute standard is
merely a figure of speech. Its association with the theory of score-card judging
has only served to confuse those who undertake to get, by a percentage system,
results which in practice are reached by a system of specific cuts. The scale
of points is an absolutely negligible factor in judging. Attempts to introduce
it only serve to confuse.
Essential factors in score-card judging. The specific cuts and
the symbol of perfection 100 are the essential factors in score-card
judging. The use of a score card serves its purpose only when the
score secured approximately represents the common expert estimate
of the general quality of the specimen. Scoring, as has been shown,
is not judging, but recording judgments. To score properly, that
JUDGING 569
is, in accordance with commonly accepted ideas of quality, one
must know first the requirements of the standard used, and the
common interpretations of Standard specifications, and then what
is the common practice in applying specific cuts. In the use of
the score card the practical question for the novice is not, What
is the percentage of a fault, and its numerical value when computed
from the value allotted the section in which it appears? but, What
is the usual specific cut made for that fault? Accuracy in score-
card judging consists not in expertness in mathematical calculations,
but in thorough observation, point by point, and registration of the
appropriate cut for every fault. One may score according to his
own ideas, just as he may interpret the Standard and breed accord-
ing to his ideas (and the personal equation always has some in-
fluence on judging), but to judge so that his scores will indicate
approximately the same quality as the same scores by others, he
must learn by observation and practice to make the same specific
cuts for the same faults.
Advantages of score-card judging. The particular advantages of
score-card judging are that it is complete, both as to individuals
and as to classes and exhibitions, where it is applied, and that it
furnishes a record which indicates in a general way the locations
and measures of faults. In class instruction and drill in judging,
the use of score cards is necessary.
Limitations of the score card. In the ordinary use of the score
card, while specific cuts are made in each section where fault is
found, the symbol recorded on the card does not identify the fault
farther than to indicate whether it is a color or a shape defect. The
conditions of competitive judging do not admit of the use of score
cards which specify the particular faults in each section, but for
personal and class use score cards may be as elaborate as desired.
The forms in common use for judging have blank spaces for
“Remarks,” but these are not used systematically, and give space
for only the briefest possible statement. For class and private use
larger cards with more space for descriptions of faults are sometimes
used, also cards with the common faults in each section indicated,
so that in marking the card the defect may be checked with a sin-
gle mark as the specific cut is registered. Simple as this seems,
the use of such a card in the showroom almost doubles the time
570 POULTRY CULTURE
OFFICIAL SCORE CARD OF THE AMERICAN POULTRY
ASSOCIATION *
Date Variety
Owner. Sex
Address. Band No
Entry No. Weight
Suave | CoLor REMARKS
Symmetry
Weight or size.
Condition
Head and beak
Eyes
Comb
Wattles and ear lobes
Neck
Wings
Back
Tail
Breast
Body and fluff
Legs and toes
*Hardness of feather.
+Crest and beard
Total cuts Score
*Applies to Games and Game Bantams.
tApplies to crested breeds.
Name of judge
Secretary
1 By courtesy of the American Poultry Association.
JUDGING 571
required for judging. It is not advisable to make score cards
more definitely record the character of faults by increasing the
number of sections, because to considerably increase the number
of sections and still have the birds make the usual scores for their
quality would require a revaluation of specific points too difficult
to work out and apply.
Use of score cards. The arrangement of sections on a score
card is devised to secure rapidity and thoroughness of examination
of the specimens under consideration. Taking the official score card
of the American Poultry Association for purpose of illustration, it
is noted that the form provides first for the general description and
identification of the specimen, and for the record of its weight. At
a show which is judged by score card the birds are usually weighed
by officials or attendants before judging begins, and the weight is
marked on the card as given to the judge.
The first three sections on the card are general sections. Syaz-
metry, aS defined in the Standard of Perfection, really means
breed shape, or typc. This section has been the subject of endless
controversy, many judges insisting that to cut for symmetry after
having cut shape faults in every section was to punish such faults
twice. In common practice little effort is made to value this section
discriminatingly. Some judges make a cut of one half on symmetry
on every card before looking at the birds at all. Cuts for condztion
penalize an exhibitor for failure to properly fit his birds or for
showing birds in any way out of condition. These points may be
judged without handling the bird. The other sections are usually
marked, in order, as the bird is handled, though such points as
shape of breast and back, spread and carriage of tail, etc. may
have been noted by the judge before he took the bird in his hands.
An inexperienced person is not likely to carry such points accu-
rately in his mind, and should place the bird in proper position for
inspection before deciding on the cut for each section. Examina-
tion begins with the head, and proceeds section by section — head
and beak, neck, wings, back, tail, breast, body and fluff, legs and
toes. Every Standard specification for each section is considered,
1 In judging by comparison the judge is supposed to consider size and weight
and to disqualify specimens that are under the disqualifying weights, but the
birds are not weighed, and the rule is a dead letter in comparison shows.
POULTRY CULTURE
572
THE DECIMAL SCORE CARD’
Date
Sex
Breed
Coop No. Weight
Entry No.
Ring No.
= *SUOIIGIYXS JO} pred sty} JO asn oy} UL
be
2 | yovedsip samosas sty, ‘aovds 10/09 ay} oyu! UMop daap 1 Aize9 pure oul
a = pavop ay} aaoqe ysnf{ ainBy oy} sdUaWIWIOD ‘JIAa Ja}¥a19 DY} SI 10[09
Q 5 JJ “SUIT payop ayy apnjour oj ySnoua Moy yng ‘advys 310f adeds oy} ut
2 ‘gg | 39 ‘10[O9 URY] aATaJap sow st adeys J{ ‘AUT ay} MOJaq ‘10[09 4105 o
5G | faut panop ayy aaoqe yno oy} oye ‘adeys JO ‘uUN[OD dy} UT Nd pue 5
A 3 ainqeay dA1qdaJap ayy (xX) YoYo ‘sBa] 10 ‘pray ‘quiod yYyBIam 1O0J nd OL, o
vo
i a $8 oy oy eo. + re os oo. ay ¢ kb
S| @ feas| Pa |e |e | 28 [fe] 2s [Pes
he 8 |jna@as)a 6 jad |a46)/aH6 |ad |aS jaad
° Na VwyYy VY es avert YY [Ya
3g |
eo | 2 ¥
1 Bnd bod
ai 4 g || 8
o
= 5 a 9° <
i>) 3
3 58 | Be G < Ms)
‘s é Co 4 6 n ® =
3 2 los ™ “ a > oe a %
ral & ad (t) (3) o uel a Hel bo =
fo) io) os o % A © 3 « o °
is) O |u|] 4 ea i) a & 4 a
“S}UIOg OT UODag Yoea
JIUMO JO IOVWGIYXY|
Judge
Secretary
President
’ By courtesy of I. kK. Felch.
JUDGING 573
and the total specific cut for shape or color in each section is the
aggregate of the cuts for the faults of that kind found.!
If an obvious disqualification is noted as inspection begins, it is
not usual to score that specimen in competition. Under other con-
ditions scoring may be completed with the disqualification marked.
Usually a judge, as he examines each section, looks for disqualifica-
tions in that section. A novice in scoring should have before him
the Standard description of the variety he is judging, and should
be sure, before he passes a section, that he has duly considered
every specification under it. Omissions often cause faulty scores
and account for many mistakes in making awards by the score card.
Ties are of common occurrence when score cards are used, —
more so than in comparison judging, because in using the latter
method a judge who finds birds equal in one or more sections may
make his decision on other sections. In comparison judging, two
or more birds are always actually under consideration. In profes-
sional score-card judging, each bird is independently compared
with a mental standard. In practice work an instructor with the
ideal in his mind gives the appropriate cuts for faults for certain
specimens or sections, and students determine cuts on other speci-
mens by comparison with these. In any case scoring is sure to
give many duplicate scores, and often birds which score alike may
be quite unlike, because the faults and cuts are differently distributed.
Ties in scoring need not be broken unless it is necessary to de-
termine rank for the award of prizes. The common rule for break-
ing ties of scored birds is to give the preference to the specimen
having the least cuts on shape. If a tie cannot be broken in this
way, comparison on any point agreed upon may be made and the
birds ranked accordingly. If shape cuts are equal, the specimen
nearest to the Standard weight may be ranked first.
1 The judge may not actually estimate and add all cuts. Except for conspicu-
ous faults requiring a heavy cut he is more likely to consider shape or color in
each section as a whole, and mark on his estimate of the general quality of the
section. He could cut all faults in detail only by using smaller specific cuts than
4, and that would require the use of similar fractions all along the line, and a cum-
bersome increase of the grades of quality noted. The Standard contains a list of
faults for which specific cuts are recommended, but these are definite only as to
such things as mutilations. In most cases the range of the cuts—4 to Id, or
whatever it may be —is indicated, and the judge must decide which to use.
574 POULTRY CULTURE
Uniformity in judging. Estimates of quality can never be uni-
form, but general consistency in the judgment of many persons is
possible if each considers the various sections and qualities impar-
tially. Many judges cut heavily for faults in some sections, lightly
for equally serious faults in others. The result is to lead breeders
exhibiting under those judges to give special attention to improve-
ment of the sections they cut severely, and to neglect those they
cut lightly. In comparison judging, the partial judge gives the
preference to specimens with characters he particularly admires,
though on the whole inferior to others, and the influence on breed-
ing is the same. Broadly speaking, characters in an organism
judged on appearance must be considered as of equal value. This
is attained if the person judging them has a true appreciation of
perfection, or of the most desirable form of each character, and
makes specific cuts in all sections consistently, or, in comparison
judging, gives due consideration to every point.
Recognition of utility values in judging exhibition poultry.
Characters being divided for convenience into sections, impartial
consideration of sections will usually result in estimates of value
not seriously open to criticism from the practical poultryman’s point
of view. While, from that point of view, color and some superficial
points may be of little importance, as long as substantial qualities
are not neglected, consideration of the others should not be con-
demned, but rather encouraged, for, as has been said, observation
shows that few people indifferent to superficial beauty in poultry
show marked appreciation of essential properties of form. For
this reason, judging solely on utility points is of doubtful value
as an aid to the improvement of utility qualities. When the sub-
ject is fully considered, a large proportion of what are commonly
called fancy points are in a very literal sense utility points.
Judging poultry products. Judging dressed poultry and eggs is
a much simpler process than judging poultry on all external points.
In judging dressed poultry and eggs the number of characters,
qualities, or points to be considered is small; slight differences in
quality do not make great differences in value, as in high-class
birds, and degrees of quality are more readily appreciated. While
score cards are sometimes used for judging dressed poultry and
eggs, the number of sections into which a card may appropriately
JUDGING 575
be divided is so small that there is little if any advantage in scoring,
and if, to develop a system of scoring, many sections are made, the
process of judging is complicated when it should remain sim-
ple. The points to be considered are so few, and the values so
apparent, that judgment of all is practically instantaneous. Again,
commercial grades of these articles are established with designa-
tions more suitable and more generally intelligible than scores
obtained as in judging exhibition poultry. The commercial stand-
ard of highest excellence is 1, and increasing numerical value of
symbols indicates decreasing quality. The rational method of
judging dressed poultry and eggs is to grade them according
to market quality and value. If then it is desired to indicate the
rank of an exhibit in any grade, it can be done for the best few
in the usual way, by cards or ribbons, or for an entire class by
placing them in order of merit. The assignment to a known or
described grade gives the approximate value as accurately as
scoring exhibition poultry.
CHAPTER XXX
THE TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS
Textbook treatment of the trade in poultry for exhibition and.
breeding discusses it for both buyers and sellers, for the beginner
in this line of trade is interested in it in both capacities, and is
usually in need of information and advice in both; it is as neces-
sary to buy right as to sell right, and more difficult to learn how.
Through inability to buy right most novices lose from one to three
years in getting a good start in breeding fine poultry. It is not
possible for any one to wholly avoid mistakes, — experienced
breeders often make them, — but any beginner may greatly reduce
the number of his mistakes, and save money and time, by learning
something of the general conditions of this trade, and of the obliga-
tions of buyer and seller in it, before he begins to buy or places
an order for stock, instead of learning by repeated mistakes how
not to buy. In many of the matters treated in this chapter it is
not necessary to distinctly specify the interests of buyer and seller,
for they partly coincide, and when they do not, the particular in-
terest of each is obvious. Special statements of different interests
are made wherever the conditions require.
Composite character of the trade. There are very few instances
where staple food products are also developed for their zsthetic
values, — none where it is done extensively, as with poultry. In
consequence of this combination of economic and zesthetic elements
in the trade there is more or less conflict between the advocates
of utility and the advocates of fancy, and a tendency for the ex-
tremists in each cult to emphasize their devotion to their own
ideas by pointed disregard of those of their opponents. On the
whole, however, the compound nature of values in pure-bred poultry
is rightly appreciated in America, and while some friction between
these interests is inevitable, the extremist in either direction has
little influence. The great body of persons giving special attention
576
TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS 577
to poultry recognize beauty, in its way, as serviceable as utility, and
consider some combination of the two desirable.
Values in pure-bred poultry and eggs. Three kinds of value are
distinguished in high-class stock : (1) food, or consumptive, value ;
(2) breeding, or productive, value ; and (3) exhibition, or @sthetzc,
value. It is usual to consider food values as strictly real values,
and the others as in a measure fictitious, and therefore less stable.
Both views are at fault.
The food value of poultry and eggs as indicated in the price
may be in part an zsthetic value. When a consumer pays a pre-
mium for white eggs over brown, or vice versa, the difference in
price represents what he is willing to pay to gratify a fancy (de-
veloped by custom) for eggs with shells of a particular color. There
is no difference in the quality of the eggs. When he pays a pre-
mium for a@ particular color of skin in poultry, that premium repre-
sents not value in the poultry, but preference or prejudice,
according to the point of view. When he pays twice as much per
pound for a squab broiler as for a nice fowl (or buys a green duck),
he is not buying on a basis of actual nutritive value, but catering
to his appreciation of beauty through the sense of taste and sight,
just as in paying a high price for a bird externally beautiful he
caters to his appreciation of beauty perceived by the eye alone.
Recognition of the zesthetic element in what are commonly con-
sidered strictly economic values enables us to better apprehend the
substantial nature of zesthetic values. The physical needs of man
are his primary needs; normally they must be satisfied first. But
with the physical wants satisfied, his mental and spiritual nature
as insistently craves beauty. Capacity to enjoy beauty, and desire
to possess what is rare, lead men, according to their means, to
willingly pay much more for a beautiful object or creature than for
an equally useful one lacking that quality. The laws of supply and
demand regulate the prices of exhibition poultry as constantly as
they do the prices of market poultry. Esthetic value in the living
bird is relatively greater than zesthetic value in table poultry and
eggs, not only because it is more durable in the individual but
because it may be multiplied through the individual. Even in its
lowest grade of excellence the pure-bred bird is more valuable than
the mongrel, because through it may be reproduced more certainly
578 POULTRY CULTURE
those qualities which command a premium in the food markets.
For every grade of pure-bred poultry, from the most ordinary breed-
ing stock to the finest exhibition specimens, there is a demand at
a price corresponding to its azsthetic value. Not only so, but the
scale of prices for the finest specimens is steadily rising.
Profits from fancy poultry. The profits from pure-bred poultry
and eggs sold for breeding and exhibition are rarely greater and
often less than those from market poultry. While the scale of prices
is higher, the cost of production is slightly greater, and the expense
of selling very much greater. Even when pure-bred stock of good
quality is used to produce market poultry and eggs, and some of
the best stock and their eggs sold at fancy prices, the cost of sell-
ing this stock may be so great that the net profit is no greater
than if everything had been sold at market prices. A person with
an abundance of capital, which he is willing to put out on a pros-
pect of future returns, may do a business of this kind at a loss for
some years and ultimately make it very profitable. Most persons
engaging in the business have to begin in a small way and build
up slowly. All such should be very careful not to spend more
money to get business than the amount of stock they are likely
to sell will warrant. Building up a trade in this line is usually a
very slow process.
Peculiarities of the trade. The producer of market poultry and
eggs, wherever located, is in touch with an informal system for the
distribution of his products through which he can at any time dis-
pose of his produce at prices fixed by general market conditions.
The collection and distribution of his products is done by nonpro-
ducers. The trade organization is such that a surplus at any point
is removed, or a shortage relieved very quickly, and by the use of
cold storage a general surplus at one season is carried over to a
season of scarcity. The trade in pure-bred poultry and eggs is
largely direct from producer to consumer. A comparatively small
number of concerns are in this line as dealers. Some breeders,
who have developed a demand for more than they can produce,
buy to sell again. Most producers sell, or try to sell, what they
produce, and a large part of what is distributed through dealers is
stock the producer had first tried to sell direct. The business is
largely a “‘ mail-order” business.
TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS 579
In a well-established large business of this class the egg trade
may run through nearly half the year and sales of poultry be made
throughout the year, but the bulk of the egg trade comes in two
or three spring months, and the bulk of the sales of stock in two
or three preceding months. In a new business, trade in both lines
is quite closely limited to the short periods of greatest demand. In
most cases this means that a great deal of stock (the best of the
ordinary good breeding stock) must be carried, at heavy expense,
for several months after it is ready to ship, and must then be sold
in competition with later-hatched stock of distinctly less breeding
value. The breeder having an established and growing trade can
work off a large part of his early-hatched stock in the fall and
early winter, and can usually get prices for the rest, when sold
later, which warrant his holding it.
Beginners, as a rule, hold too much stock for the trade which
comes late in the winter, when small poultry keepers begin to think
of mating breeding pens, and hold too many specimens of inferior
quality. Many breeders make it a rule to carry nothing over that
cannot be sold at five dollars for males and two dollars and fifty
cents or three dollars for females. A beginner with ordinary stock
may make his minimum prices somewhat lower, but to be on the
safe side of profit he should make it a rule to sell no fancy stock for
less than double its market value, and to carry over none (males
especially) that he cannot sell on that basis. Male birds sold for
market the last of the winter will often bring less than if sold as
broilers the preceding summer.
Confidence the basis of trade. Trade in this line depends, even
more than usual, on the buyer’s confidence in the seller, who is
usually the producer and so is presumed to know absolutely the
merits and faults of the goods. The purchaser of eggs for hatch-
ing has only the seller's word for their quality. The purchaser of
breeding stock relies upon the seller to deal honestly with him in
regard to removable faults and faults in ancestry. Only by secur-
ing the confidence of customers is it possible to retain their trade.
A dishonest breeder may maintain himself in the business by work-
ing new trade, but it is the consensus of opinion of those in the
trade that honesty is the best policy,—that it costs less to hold
old customers by square dealing than to get new customers by
580 POULTRY CULTURE
advertising. The confidence which is the foundation of trade in this
line pertains to the personality of the breeder to such a degree that
the ‘‘good will” of a business is not transferable. It may be bought
and sold, -but cannot be delivered.
Advertising.. To be profitable, advertising must be done system-
atically and with a view to direct results. In a line where com-
petition is keen and reputation of great importance, a newcomer
cannot reasonably expect that his advertising will bring consider-
able immediate returns ; but as what it does bring is all that he will
get from it,! he should not expend more in advertising than the
amount of stock he has to sell will justify,-or than he can afford to
spend if the returns prove small. One who has little capital and
no experience in selling through advertising does well to advertise,
for a season, in a very modest way. At an expenditure of from two
dollars to five dollars per month, according to the style of advertis-
ing and the circulation of the paper, he can buy in any of the
poultry papers space large enough for an announcement which
may bring him ina year several hundred dollars’ worth of business.
It is usually best for a beginner to select a good paper in his own
territory, and to advertise only in that for the first season. On the
basis of that experience he should be able to decide whether to
go on with this paper on the same scale, or to increase, or to try
another paper. Poultry papers are usually the best mediums for
advertising poultry, but some of the general agricultural papers,
especially those of large circulation, are excellent mediums. News-
papers, except when they make a specialty of poultry advertising,
generally give poor returns to poultry advertisers. In writing adver-
tisements one should be plain and direct, stating just what he has
to sell, the price, and his address. In reading advertisements with
a view to buying, the apparently conflicting claims of advertisers
are often so confusing that the buyer in search of the best is at
a loss where to buy. The real difficulty here is not in the adver-
tising but in the attitude of the buyer. The stock of competing
breeders is usually about equal in quality. One breeder's stock may
be especially strong in one character, another’s in another. As
1 This is practically, not literally, correct. As poultry papers are often pre-
served for reference, some sales are made from dead advertisements. There is
also some cumulative value in advertising, but the amount of this in small, inter-
mittent advertising is practically negligible.
TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS 581
between such breeders, statements based on winnings and claims
of winnings are immaterial points and may be ignored. In trans-
actions of importance it is not usually advisable to order direct from
an advertisement. A fuller description of the stock should be se-
cured, either from the breeder’s circular or from correspondence.
Correspondence. In the initial stages of the ordinary business of
this character, printed circulars are of doubtful value as aids in selling
stock. A circular is effective for this purpose only when it has the
personality and force of a letter. A circular which lacks these may
make a favorable impression, but rarely brings matters to a conclu-
sion ; correspondence is still necessary. The novice will, as a rule,
find it to his advantage to answer by letter inquiries received from
advertising, at sufficient length and with such attention to details
as will give the inquirer all the information he needs in order to
decide whether to buy. Every inquiry should be answered promptly
and fully so far as it actually relates to business, but a poultry breeder
is under no obligation to answer general inquiries, such as many
correspondents make, not relating directly to the transaction, nor is
it good policy to reply to such inquiries with the idea that it helps
sales. Promptness and directness in replying to proper inquiries
are of the greatest importance. Most poultrymen are slack in both
respects. Much of the value of advertising may be lost by not
taking proper care of inquiries as received. An accurate memo-
randum of the reply to each letter received should be made on it.
Copies of letters of special importance, whether relating to pur-
chases or to sales of stock and eggs, should be preserved.
Terms and obligations. Transactions in pure-bred poultry and
eggs are mostly on a cash basis, — as a mail-order business must be.
Poultry is sometimes sold on approval, sometimes on specifications
as contained in correspondence. Transactions on approval afford
most protection to the buyer. If the specifications are clearly under-
stood by both sides, transactions on specifications are on a basis
more satisfactory to both. Misunderstandings on this point, and
inadequate statements by both parties, are responsible for most of
the differences arising out of transactions in poultry of this class.
When poultry is sold on approval the buyer pays transportation
charges one way, unless it is specified that he shall pay both ways.
The time given for inspection may be from one to three days,
582 POULTRY CULTURE
according to agreement. A consignee should not receive from a
transportation company and receipt for a shipment not in good con-
dition. It is assumed that the transportation company does not
receive goods not in good condition and properly packed, and the
receipt given the shipper is evidence that the shipment was right
when received from him. For damage in transit the transportation
company is liable! A consignee, having accepted a shipment of
live poultry from a transportation company, cannot complain of
either the consignor or the carrier if birds are found sick or be-
come sick shortly after receipt. He cannot, after accepting them
from the carrier, return birds for sickness developing within the
period he is allowed for examination. If he does, the consignor
may properly refuse to accept them or to refund the money.
When birds are sold on specifications the buyer may insist on
receiving everything according to specifications, but cannot refuse
to accept stock for a fault not mentioned in the specifications, ex-
cept in cases where a general statement of quality has been made
which is a misrepresentation of a specimen with such a fault. One
of the most serious causes of trouble to inexperienced buyers comes
from. misunderstanding the relations of disqualifications to value.
Without a disqualifying fault anywhere, a bird may be so poor as
to be worthless for either exhibition or breeding purposes. Many
breeders consider it legitimate to sell such birds to people who
want cheap breeding stock, on the negative representation ‘‘ not
disqualified” or ‘‘free from disqualifications’’; the buyer should
be sure that his order calls for positive quality. The shipper who
works off cheap stock in this way loses more than he gains.
Sales of eggs for hatching may be unconditional or on a guar-
anty of fertility or of per cent of hatch. Much dissatisfaction arises
in egg transactions because of the poor appearance of eggs of high-
class stock. This cannot always be avoided when stock is bred
primarily for exhibition quality. Those not willing to accept that
1It has been repeatedly decided in court that a transportation company is
liable to the full value of birds lost or killed in transportation, even though the
shipper had signed the express receipt in common use, limiting the liability of
the transportation company to a small valuation per bird, but as a rule claims for
damage in excess of the amount specified in the “ release” can only be collected
in court, and in ordinary cases the trouble and expense of a suit deter the shipper
from pressing his claim.
TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS 583
fault with exhibition excellence should buy only where they can
find the combination they desire. A buyer cannot complain to a
seller for poor appearance of eggs unless eggs were represented
otherwise, nor can a buyer refuse to accept a shipment of eggs
in a package in good condition, or, because he does not like their
appearance, discard them for incubation and seek redress from
the shipper. If the package is damaged he should refuse to
accept it from the carrier; if the package is not damaged, and
the eggs are sold under a guaranty, he must incubate them or
he is not entitled to the benefit of the guaranty. When a buyer
refuses to accept a shipment from a transportation company, and
the goods are returned, the seller should refund the money,
according to terms, and adjust the matter with the transporta-
tion company. He cannot protect himself, at the expense of his
customer, while the matter is in process of adjustment with the
transportation company.
Scales of prices. In a preceding paragraph the statement was
made that double the market value was the lowest price that should
be made on this class of poultry and eggs. Unless this can be
realized, it is better to sell at market prices and under conditions
which insure that neither stock nor eggs will be used except for
food. This is easily managed by selling poultry dressed and by
mating only hens actually needed for breeding purposes. It is not
good business policy to sell breeding stock and eggs at a slight
advance over market prices, except where they can be sold in large
quantities and without expense for advertising, packing, etc. Those
who sell in small quantities at such prices make little or nothing,
and hurt the trade both for themselves and for others. A breeder
should not be satisfied to sell much of his product at the minimum
prices indicated, or to sell any of it at such prices very long. If he
cannot, within a few years, develop a growing trade and reach the
usual prices for ordinary good breeding stock (one dollar and fifty
cents and up per thirteen for eggs, and two dollars and up for fowls
and ducks, with corresponding prices for other kinds of poultry),
he may well conclude that there is something wrong, — that either
he has not the right kind of stock, or he is not adapted to this
trade. In selling at usuil prices for eggs and for most of the
stock sold, the breeding stock used should be of distinctly better
584 POULTRY CULTURE
quality, and any birds of quality equal to or approaching that of
the breeders should be held at prices which fairly represent their
value. A small breeder does not often have many of these after
he has selected his own breeders; hence he can afford to hold
them until he gets his price, even though he has to carry them
into the second year.
From the time he begins to sell stock a poultry breeder should
make a practice of carefully grading it according to his scale of
prices. Many beginners selling at low prices neglect this on the
ground that, as the poorest they have are worth the price, every
customer gets his money's worth, and if some get more than that,
no harm is done. To say nothing of other aspects of the case, this
is a serious mistake for a breeder to make, for while the egg trade
must always be something of a lottery, the most important thing
in selling high-class birds is to determine their money value cor-
rectly and give each customer good value — full measure of quality
—for the price, but not the quality which should bring a better
price. It is the buyers, —the public, — not the seller, that make
prices in fancy poultry. Prices rise steadily because people are
increasingly willing to pay high prices for fine specimens. The
breeder always has to consider, before he sells his best bird at a
price, however high, whether an inferior bird would suit that cus-
tomer, and what, if he lets this bird go, he will do for a customer
willing to pay a still higher price. Such conditions in a trade easily
lead to abuse of the confidence of customers ignorant of values,
but such abuses work their own cure by putting out of business
those who practice them. The salesman in this line must have
nice judgment of values, and apply it honestly; he should lose no
opportunity to train his judgment. As a novice he ought also to
consider that he is likely to make mistakes ; and when complaints
are made as to the quality of the birds he furnishes, he should
consider them carefully and adjust any error found.
Packing and shipping. All poultry and eggs of this class are
shipped by express. The question of shipping by freight is agitated
occasionally, but general conditions of freight traffic make the risk
too great.
Poultry is shipped mostly in light wooden coops, tight all round
except at the top, which is slatted. Coops of this style may be
TRADE IN PURE-BRED POULTRY AND EGGS 585
bought in quantity, in “knockdown” form, at very moderate prices.
Formerly light boxes used for light, bulky groceries were much
used for shipping poultry, and some of them were easily converted
into very satisfactory shipping coops. Since paper cartons have
come into extensive use, the supply of second-hand boxes is limited,
and most breeders find it more satisfactory, on the whole, to use
the regulation coops. These are made in several sizes, from single-
bird size up to a size large enough for a pen of five medium-to-
small fowls. Valuable males should always be shipped in single
coops. Ordinary good males, not to be exhibited soon, may be
shipped in coops with females, but there is always some risk of
the females injuring the comb or plumage of a male when closely
confined with him fora long period. For a short shipment — say,
of one day —it is not necessary to provide for feeding and water-
ing in transit. For long shipments the coops should have tin
drinking cups attached in a corner inside, and a small bag of feed
should be fastened to the coop.
Lggs. Small lots of eggs for hatching are shipped either in
common flat splint baskets, with or without pasteboard fillers or
boxes, or in specially constructed boxes, with fillers. Valuable
eggs sold in large quantities are usually packed in small lots, but
sometimes heavy round half-bushel or bushel baskets are used,
and the eggs packed in excelsior without other filler. Low-priced
eggs in large lots are often shipped in ordinary egg cases or in
cases of the same kind, with a little packing material to relieve
the jar. While it is difficult to ascertain the facts, comparisons of
results of hatches indicate that a jar which does not break eggs
may seriously affect their hatching, and that, other things being
equal, carefully packed eggs give the best hatches. For packing
material in pasteboard fillers, bran, fine chaff, and broken cork are
used. The fillers or boxes are usually placed in a basket or wooden
box, with a packing of fine hay or excelsior under, around, and
sometimes over them. For packing without fillers, in baskets, ex-
celsior alone may be used, a thick layer being placed in the bottom
of the basket, each egg wrapped in excelsior, and enough of the
same material placed between the sides of the basket and the eggs,
and over the eggs, to protect them. When the baskets used are of
ample size, and sufficient excelsior is used, this is the best way to
586 POULTRY CULTURE
pack eggs for hatching. If too little excelsior is used, or the pack-
ing is carelessly done, it is one of the worst.
A novice in packing and shipping who has no opportunity to
observe packing done by experts will benefit greatly by closely
observing how both the poultry and the eggs that he buys are
packed, and noting in eggs the results of hatches from differently
packed lots.
Effect of weather on shipments. It is not advisable to ship fine
poultry or eggs for hatching in either very cold or very hot weather.
Usually a shipper uses his judgment on this point, and if a pur-
chaser insists on shipment regardless of weather conditions the
purchaser takes the risk of damages or loss which may occur as
a result. In general, periods unfavorable to the shipping of birds
and eggs are short, and a few days’ delay makes little difference,
except when birds are to be shipped to a show and must arrive
on a given date. In that case the shipment must be made regard-
less of weather conditions, and it is usually understood that the
purchaser takes the risks.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The following lists of books and pamphlets include only such as are histori-
cally valuable or have original merit, and are published solely to give information.
Publications which simply repeat matters of common knowledge, and those which
combine information with advertising, are omitted, although many of the latter
contain much valuable matter. Books marked with an asterisk are recommended
as, in the opinion of the author, most desirable for those who want a limited selec-
tion of works on poultry culture for collateral reading and for reference. The
dates of first editions are given when known. When a work published previous
to 1890 has been revised recently, the date of revision is given.
GENERAL
Cheap and Good Husbandry. Markham. (1614)
Ornamental and Domestic Poultry. Dixon and Kerr. (1860)
Ornamental, Aquatic, and Domestic Fowl. Dolan
Our Domestic Fowls. Martin. (1847)
Poultry. Dickson. (1838)
Poultry. Moubray. (1815)
Rare Prize and Domestic Poultry. Ferguson and Culliford. (1854)
The American Poulterer’s Companion. Bement. (1856)
The American Poultry Book. Cocke. (1843)
The Dorking Fowl. Baily. (1851)
The History of the Hen Fever. Burnham. (1855)
The Husbandrye, Ordring, and Governmente of Poultrie, practiced by the
learnedste and suche as have beene knowne Skilfullest in that Aarte in
our Tyme. Mascall. (1581)
The Illustrated Book of Domestic Poultry. Doyle. (1854)
The Malay Fowl and Malay Bantam. Branford. (1849)
The Poultry Book. Bennett. (1850)
The Poultry Yard. Boswell. (1841)
Note. The foregoing belong to the early period in poultry literature, the follow-
ing to the modern period.
American Poultry Culture. Sando. (1908)
An Egg Farm. Stoddard. (1888)
Breeding and Management of Poultry. Felch. (1877)
Encyclopedia of Poultry. Chanticleer. (1909)
Farm Poultry. Watson. (1901)
587
588 POULTRY CULTURE
First Lessons in Poultry Keeping. Robinson. (1905)
Fowls for Profit. Johnson. (1903)
How to keep Hens for Profit. Valentine. (1910)
Making Poultry pay. Powell. (1907)
Pleasurable Poultry Keeping. Edward Brown. (1893)
Pocket-Money Poultry. Norys. (1899)
Possibilities of Modern Poultry Farming. Hicks and Ewart. (1909)
Poultry Breeding. Purvis. (1tg1o) :
Poultry-Craft. Robinson. (1899)
Poultry Culture. Felch. (188g)
Poultry Culture for Profit. Sturges. (1907)
Poultry for the People. Comyns. (1889)
Poultry for the Table and Market vs. Fancy Fowls. Tegetmeier. (1892)
Poultry Keeping as an Industry for Farmers and Cottagers. Edward Brown.
(1891, 1906)
Poultry Keeping in India. Tweed. (1903)
Poultry Management. Bell. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 287, United States
Department of Agriculture. (1907)
Poultry Management on a Farm. Palmer. (1902)
Practical Poultry Raising. Jull. Baudletzn No, 26, Department of Agriculture,
Victoria, British Columbia. (1910)
Profitable Poultry Production. Kains. (1910)
Progressive Poultry Culture. Brigham. (1905)
* Races of Domestic Poultry. Edward Brown. (1906)
Report on the Poultry Industry in America. Edward Brown. (1906)
Report on the Poultry Industry in Denmark and Sweden. Edward Brown.
(1908)
Report on the Poultry Industry in Germany. Edward Brown. (1911)
The ABC of Poultry. Johnstone. (1g06)
The Illustrated Book of Poultry. Wright. (1874. 1911)
The New Egg Farm. Stoddard. (1900)
The Poultry Book. Tegetmeier. (1867)
The Poultry Book. Weir. (1903)
The Poultry Manual. Sturges. (1909)
The Practical Poultry Breeder and Feeder. Cook. (1883. 1901)
The Practical Poultry Keeper. Wright. (1867, 1899)
SPECIAL FEATURES, CLASSES, AND BREEDS
Bantams. Entwistle. (1894)
Bantams as a Hobby. Proud
Broilers and Roasters. Robinson. (1905)
Capons and Caponizing. Dow. (1891)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 589
Capons and Caponizing. Slocum. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 452, United States
Department of Agriculture. (1911)
Domestic Waterfowl. Stoddard. (1885)
Ducks and Geese. Howard. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 6g, United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture. (1897)
Ducks and Geese. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1900)
Ducks and how to make them pay. Cook. (1895)
Duck Culture. Rankin. (1897, 1906)
Eggs and Egg Farms. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1900)
Fancy Waterfowl. Finn. (1900)
Game Fowls. Cooper. (1889)
Hamburgs Up to Date. Holt
How we make Ducks pay. Weber. (1906)
Leghorns. Hesford. (1896)
Minorca Fowls. Biggs. (1893)
Ornamental Waterfowl. Hubbard. (1888)
Pheasant Raising in the United States. Oldys. /armers’ Bulletin No. 390,
United States Department of Agriculture. (1910)
Points on the Breeding of Pheasants. Sudow
Private Game Preserves in the United States. Palmer. Crvcular No. 92, United
States Biological Survey. (1910)
Sussex Fowls and Fattening. Hurst. (1905)
The Ancona Fowl. Briggs
The Asiatics. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series
The Bantam Book. Clough
The Bantam Fowl. McGrew. (1899)
The Blue Andalusian. Silver Dun
The Book of the Hamburgs. Baum. (1886)
The Book of the Hamburgs. Hewes. (1902)
The Brown Leghorns. Stoddard. (1885)
The China Fowl. Burnham. (1874)
The Cocker. Sketchley. (1814)
The Houdan Fowl. Lee. (1874)
The Improvement of the Farm Egg. Lamon and Opperman. A#ulletin
No. 142, United States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1911)
The Langshan Fowls. A. C. C. and C. W. G. (1877)
The Leghorns. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1901)
The Light Brahmas. Stoddard. (1885)
The Minorca Fowl. Harrison. (1893)
The Old English Game Fowl. Atkinson. (1891)
The Orpington Fowl and how to breed it. Campbell. (1903)
The Orpingtons. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1910)
590 POULTRY CULTURE
The Plymouth Rock. McGrew. Budletin No. 29, United States Bureau of
Animal Industry. (1901)
The Plymouth Rocks. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1899)
The Rhode Island Reds. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series.
(1910)
The Turkey, Duck, and Goose. Johnson. (1904)
The Waterfowl Family. Sanford, Bishop, and Van Dyke
The Wyandotte. McGrew. Bulletin No. 32, United States Bureau of Animal
Industry. (1901)
The Wyandottes. Stoddard. (1885)
The Wyandottes. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1899)
The Wyandotte Book. McGrew. (1905)
The Wyandotte Fowl. Field. (1890)
The Wyandotte Fowl. Various authors. (1884)
Turkeys. McGrew. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 200, United States Department
of Agriculture. (1904)
Turkeys. Various authors. Reliable Poultry-Journal Series. (1909)
Wyandottes. Hewes. (1908)
Wyandottes. Wallace. (1891)
Houses AND FIxTURES
A Gasoline-Heated Colony Brooder House. Rice and Lawry. Bulletin
No. 246, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station. (1907)
Building Poultry Houses. Rice. oe. 76, Cornell Reading Course for Farmers.
(1903)
Built and used by Poultrymen. Hare. editor. (1909)
Construction of a Poultry House. Atwood. #uu/letin No. 130, West Virginia
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1911)
Housing of Chickens. Dryden. £xtenston Bulletin No. 2, Oregon Agricultural
College. (1909)
Low-Cost Poultry Houses. Darrow
New Poultry Appliances. Rice and Lawry. Bulletin .Vo.248, Cornell Agricul-
tural Experiment Station. (1907)
Poultry Architecture. Fiske. (1902)
Poultry Architecture. Stoddard. (1879)
Poultry Houses. Lane, Extension Bulletin No. 8, University of Minnesota.
(1910).
Poultry Houses and Fixtures. Hunter. (1907)
* Poultry Houses and Fixtures. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal
Series. (1910)
Poultry-House Construction and its Influence on Domestic Fowls. Opperman.
Bulletin No. 146, Maryland Agricultural College. (1910)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 591
Questions on Poultry-House Construction. Rice and Lawry, Wo. 33, Cornell
Reading Course for Farmers. (1907)
The Improved Gasoline-Heated Colony Brooder House. Rice and Rogers.
Bulletin No, 227, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Foops and FEEDING
Analyses of Feeding Stuffs. Willard and others. Bulletin No, 158, Kansas
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
Analyses of Miscellaneous Food Materials. Woods and Merrill. Bulletin
Vo. 75, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. (1901)
Breakfast Foods. Harcourt and Fulmer. Bzdletin No, 162, Ontario Depart-
ment of Agriculture. (1907)
Cereal Foods. Merrill. Budletzn Mo. 778, Maine Agricultural Experiment
Station. (1905)
Commercial Feeding Stuffs. Carson and Fraps. Bzlletin No. 127, Texas
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Commercial Feeding Stuffs. H. J. Wheeler and others. Bulletin No. 94,
Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station (1903); also Bulletin
Wo. 112, same (1906)
Commercial Feeding Stuffs on the Connecticut Market. Bulletin No. 745,
Connecticut Experiment Station (1904); also Bulletin No. 177, same
(1905)
Comparison of Four Methods of feeding Early-Hatched Pullets. Rice.
Bulletin No. 249, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station. (1907)
Composition of Ontario Feeding Stuffs. Gamble. Bzu/let¢n No. 138, Ontario
Agricultural College. (1905)
Concentrated Commercial Feeding Stuffs. Jonesand others. Bulletin No. 741,
Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Condimental Stock and Poultry Foods. Lindsey. Bulletin No. 106, Massa-
chusetts Agricultural Experiment Station. (1905)
Cost of Egg Production. Wing. Bulletin No. 204, Cornell Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1902)
Cottonseed Meal. Woods and Bartlett. Bullef7n No. 175, Maine Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1905)
Effect of Food on Breaking Strength of Bones. Burnett. Bulletin Vo. 107,
Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
Exact Calculation of Balanced Rations. Willard. Bulletin No. 115, Kansas
Agricultural College. (1902) ;
Examination of Cattle and Poultry Foods. Lindsey. Budletin No. rrez,
Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station. (1907)
Fattening Poultry. Lee. Budllefzn No. rgo, United States Bureau of Animal
Industry. (1911f
592 POULTRY CULTURE
Feeding and Management of Poultry for Egg Production. Jeffrey. Bulletin
No. 217, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Feeding and Rearing of Chickens. Cobb
Feeding for Eggs. Dryden. E£xtenszon Bulletin Wo. g, Oregon Agricultural
College. (1909)
Feeding of Laying Hens. Rice. Bulletin No. 17, Cornell Reading Course
Sor Farmers. (1903)
Food Value of a Pound of Milk Solids. Beach. Budlle/in No. 77, Connecti-
cut Agricultural Experiment Station. (1904)
Food Value of Corn and Corn Products. Woods. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 298,
United States Department of Agriculture. (1907)
Gluten Feeds and Meals. Hills. Badletin .Vo. 48, Vermont Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1895)
Inspection of Commercial Feeding Stuffs. Smith and Perkins. Bulletin
iVo. 136, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station, (1911)
Investigation Regarding Succulence. Robison. Bulletin Wo. 32, Michigan
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1905)
Molasses and Molasses Foods for Farm Stock. Lindsey, Holland, and Smith.
Bulletin No. 118, Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station. (1907)
Poultry Fattening. Edward Brown. (1895)
Poultry Feeding and Proprietary Feeding Stuffs. Jaffa. Bulletin No. 164,
California Agricultural Experiment Station. (1905)
Principles and Practice of Stock Feeding. Hills. Bud/letén Vo. 81, Vermont
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1900)
Seven Methods of Feeding Young Chickens. Rice and Nixon. Bulletin
“Vo. 282, Cornell Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Sugar Beets. Willard and Clothier. Bzdlefzw .Vo. 103, Kansas Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1901)
The Computation of Rations for Farm Animals by the Use of Energy Values.
Armsby. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 346, United States Department of Agri-
culture. (1909)
The Mineral Elements in Animal Nutrition. Forbes. Bulletin Vo. 207, Ohio
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
HATCHING AND REARING
Artificial Incubating and Brooding. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Jour-
nal Series. (1898)
Chicken Rearing and the Management of Incubators. Johnson. (1908)
Hydro-Incubation. Christy
Incubating and Brooding Chickens. Dryden. Buud/etin .Vo. 6, Oregon Agri-
cultural College. (1910)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 593
Incubation and Brooding. Jull. Budletin Vo. 27, Department of Agriculture,
Victoria, British Columbia. (1910)
Incubation and its Natural Laws. Cyphers. (1894)
Mortality of Incubator Chicks. Field, Marshall, and Warren, Bud/etin iVo. 617,
Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station. (1899)
Practical Artificial Incubation. Ferris. (1880)
Raising Chickens. Rice. Vo. 79, Cornell Reading Course for Farmers. (1904)
Raising Chicks Artificially. Stewart and Atwood. Budletin .Vo. 98. West
Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station. (1906)
The Art of hatching and bringing up Domestic Fowls. De Reaumur. (1750)
The Chick Book. Various authors. Reliable Poultry Journal Series. (1905)
The Eccaleobion. Bucknell
DIsEASES
A Manual of Poultry Diseases. Vale
A Nodular Tzeniasis in Fowls. Moore. Cvrcau/ar No. 3. United States Bureau
of Animal Industry. (1895)
A Quail Disease in the United States. Moore. C7rcular .Vo. rog, United
States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1907)
A Tapeworm Disease of Fowls. Gage and Opperman. Bulletin Vo. 129,
Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
Apoplectiform Septicaemia in Chickens. Norgaard. Bulle/in No. 36, United
States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1902)
Bacillary White Diarrhea of Young Chicks. Rettger and Stoneburn. Dudletin
Vo. 60, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
Bacillary White Diarrhea of Young Chicks. (Second Report.) Rettger and
Stoneburn. Bulletin No. 68. Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station. (1911)
Blackhead in Turkeys. Hadley and Kirkpatrick. Bulletin No. rgr, Rhode
Island Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Chickens and their Diseases in Hawaii. Sedgwick, Bulletin iVo. 7. Hawaii
Experiment Station. (1901)
Diseases of Chickens. Pernot. Bzd/letzz No.5, Extension Department, Ore-
gon Agricultural College. (1910)
Diseases of Domestic Poultry. Burnham. (1876)
Diseases of Fowls. Bradshaw. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 75, Department of
Agriculture, New South Wales. (1909)
Fowl Cholera and Methods of combating it. Hadley. Bulletin No. 744,
Rhode Island Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Parasitic Diseases of Poultry. Theobald
Poultry Diseases and their Treatment. Pearl, Surface, and Curtis. (1911)
Roup. Harrison and Streit. Bulletin No. 125, Ontario Agricultural College.
(1902)
594 POULTRY CULTURE
* The Common-Sense Poultry Doctor. Robinson. (1907)
The Diseases of Poultry. Hill
The Diseases of Poultry. Salmon. (1899)
The Farm-Poultry Doctor. Sanborn. (1896)
The Poultry Doctor. Lehman. (1911)
White Diarrhea of Chicks, with Notes on Coccidiosis in Birds. Morse. C7rcu-
lar No. 128, United States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1908)
EXPERIMENT AND RESEARCH
A Record of 600 Hens. Stewart and Atwood. Bulletin .Vo. 175, West
Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
Analyses of Eggs. Willard and Shaw. Budletin No. 159, Kansas Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1909)
Appliances and Methods for Pedigree Poultry Breeding. Pearl and Surface.
Bulletin No. 159, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
Ash and Grit for Growing Chicks. F.H. Hall and W. P. Wheeler. Budletin
Vo, 242, New York Agricultural Experiment Station. (1903)
Bacteriology of the Drawn-Poultry Question. Higley
Biology of Poultry Keeping. Evans. (1899)
Data on the Relative Conspicuousness of Barred and Self-Colored Fowls.
Pearl, mertcan Naturalist. (February, 1911)
Data on Variation in the Comb of the Domestic Fowl. Pearl and Pearl, Bzo-
metrika. (March, 1909)
Digestion Experiments with Poultry. E.W. Brown, Budlet/n No. 56, United
States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1904)
Experiments with Poultry. W.P. Wheeler. Summary of investigations at the
New York Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
Fattening Chickens. Graham. Bwd/etin No. 151, Ontario Agricultural College,
(1906)
Feeding Experiments. W. P. Wheeler, Bulletin .Vo. 126, New York Experi-
ment Station. (1897)
How Much Meat shall Ducks eat? F.H. Hall and W. P. Wheeler, Badletin
Vo. 259, New York Experiment Station. (1904)
Importance of Constitutional Vigor in the Breeding of Poultry. Rice and
Rogers. Vo. 45. Cornell Reading Course for Farmers. (1909)
Incubation of Chickens. W. R. Graham and others. Bulletin Vo. 163,
Ontario Department of Agriculture. (1908)
Incubator Experiments. Dryden. Bulletin No. roo, Oregon Agricultural
College. (1908)
Infection and Preservation of Eggs. Lamson. Budletin .Vo. 55, Connecticut
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
BIBLIOGRAPHY 595
Inheritance in Blood Lines, with Special Reference to the 200-Egg Hen. Pearl.
American Breeders’ Association. Vol. VI. (1910)
Inheritance in Poultry. C. B. Davenport. The Carnegie Institution of
Washington. (1906)
Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic Fowl. C. B. Davenport. The
Carnegie Institution of Washington. (1g09)
Inheritance of Fecundity. Pearl and Surface. Bulletin .Vo. 766, Maine
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
Loss of Weight in Eggs in Incubation. Stewart and Atwood. Bulletin
Vo. 73, West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station. (1901)
Mash or Whole Grain. Stewart and Atwood. Bulletin No. 88, West Virginia
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1903)
Notes on the Osteology and Mycology of the Domestic Fowl. Vaughn
Poultry as Food. Atwater, Farmers’ Bulletin Vo. 182, United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture. (1903)
Poultry Experiments. Mairs. Bud/letin .Vo. 87, Pennsylvania Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1908)
Poultry Work at the Maine Station. Woods. Audletin No. 157, Maine
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
* Seasonal Distribution of Egg Production. Pearl and Surface. Bydletin
sVo. rro, United States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1911)
Some Observations and Experiments on the Natural and Artificial Incubation
of the Egg of the Common Fowl. Albert C. Eycleshymer, in the Bzological
Bulletin. (May, 1907)
Studies on Hybrid Poultry. Pearl and Surface. Bulletin .Vo. 179, Maine
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
Studies on the Physiology of Reproduction in the Domestic Fowl. Pearl and
Curtis. in the Biological Bulletin. (September. 1909)
Studies with Sudan III. In Metabolism and Inheritance. Riddle, in the
Journal of Experimental Zoology. (March. 1910)
The Chemistry of Flesh. A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Cold Storage
upon Beef. Veal, and Poultry. Emmett and Grindley, in the /owrual of
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. (July and August, 1909)
The Development of the Chick. F.R. Lillie. (1908)
The Fertility and Hatching of Eggs. Pearl and Surface. Bulletin No. 168,
Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. (1909)
The Ligaments of the Oviduct of the Domestic Fowl. Curtis. Bu/letin
Vo. 176, Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. (1910)
The Molting of Fowls. Rice, Nixon, and Rogers. Bulletin Vo. 258. Cornell
Agricultural Experiment Station. (1908)
What Chemistry finds in Foeds. Hall, Jordan, and Jenter. Bulletin No. 166,
New York Agricultural Experiment Station. (1899)
596 POULTRY CULTURE
MARKETING
* How to kill and bleed Market Poultry. Pennington and Betts. C7rcudar
:Vo, 6r, Bureau of Chemistry, United States Department of Agriculture.
(1910)
Marketing Eggs through the Creamery. Slocum, Farmers’ Bulletin, No. 445.
United States Department of Agriculture. (1911)
Marketing Poultry Products. Rice. Vo. 26, Cornell Reading Course for
farmers. (1904)
Studies of Poultry from the Farm to the Consumer. Pennington. Czrcu/ar
Vo. 64, Bureau of Chemistry. United States Department of Agriculture
The Egg Trade of the United States. Hastings. Cvvcular No. rgo. United
States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1909)
The Marketing of Eggs. Phillips. Bzd/etix Mo. 162, Kansas Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1909)
The Poultry and Egg Industry of Leading European Countries. Fossum.
Bulletin No. 65, United States Bureau of Animal Industry. (1904)
* The Poultry Packer's Guide. Bickel. (1909)
EXHIBITING AND JUDGING
Poultry for Prizes and Profit. Long. (1872, 1909)
Preparing Fowls for Exhibition. Cobb
*The American Standard of Perfection. The American Poultry Association.
(1874, 1910)
The Philosophy of Judging. Felch, Babcock, and Lee. (188g)
MISCELLANEOUS
Farm Drainage. Stewart. ZLiveuston Bulletin Vo. 73. University Farm.
St. Paul, Minn.
How to destroy English Sparrows. Dearborn. Farmers’ Bulletin .Vo. 38}.
United States Department of Agriculture. (1910)
How to destroy Rats. Lantz. Farmers’ Bulletin No. 369. United States
Department of Agriculture. (1909)
The Cement Workers’ Handbook. Baker. (1906)
The Preservation of Hen Manure. In Budletin .Vo. 98, Maine Agricultural
Experiment Station. (1903)
INDEX TO TEXT AND ILLUSTRATIONS
With this index is included a glossary of technical terms not defined in the text. All
numerals refer to pages
Abdomen, the under part of the body
from the rear point of the breastbone
to the vent
Adaptability of poultry, 75, 476
‘Advertising for fancy poultry trade,
580
Advertising value of winning prizes,
536
/Esthetic values in poultry, 577
Age, effect of, on egg production, 300;
relation of, to breeding value, 476, 487
Agricultural poultry exhibits, 535
Agriculture, relations of, to poultry cul-
ture, 11, 28
Air cell in egg, 262
Albumin, 238, milk, 201
Alfalfa, 195
Alfilaria, 195
Alternate inheritance, 467
Alternating yards, 98
American Dominiques, 14, 395; illus-
trated, 396, 518
American Poultry Association classifi-
cation of poultry, note on, 346
American Poultry Association score
card, 570
American types, 16, 397
Anconasg, illustrated, 360
Andalusians, illustrated, 367
Animal foods, kinds of, secured under
natural conditions, 176
Antiquity of artificial methods, 241; of
poultry culture, 12
A. O. V. (Any Other Variety) classes,
548
Apples, 198
Appliances, 155; models of, for exhibi-
tion, 552
Area of yards, 97
Artichokes, 197
Artificial brooding, temperature in, 280
Artificial fitting of poultry for exhibi-
tion, 560
Artificial incubation, 241, 253; antiq-
uity of, 17; selection of eggs for,
257; temperature in, 241
Artificial selection, 478
597
Aseels, illustrated. 347
Asexual reproduction, 459
Ash, the noncombustible part of feed-
ing stuffs, consisting principally of
mineral matter, 178
Asiatic meat-type fowls, description of,
387; divisions of, 389
Atavism, 467
Back, the upper side of the body (in the
fancier’s terminology particularly the
middle of the back), the fore part
being concealed by the neck hackle
and the rear part being called, in the
male, the saddle, and in the female
(if well developed), the cushion. The
apparent length of the back depends
much upon the length and texture of
the plumage
Back-yard poultry plants, illustrated,
26, 32
Balanced ration, 206
Balancing, characters in breeding, 484 ;
exhibits at shows, 549
Bantam, Game, resemblance of the, to
jungle fowl, 344
Bantams, description and illustrations
of, 424
Bar, a band or stripe across a feather
or across a number of feathers, as
the wing bar. Very narrow barring
is sometimes called penciling
Barley, 188
Barn-door fowl. See Barnyard fowl
Barnyard fowl, a common fowl, a mon-
grel
Barred color patterns, early varieties of,
395; mating, 518
Barrel coops, 104; illustrated, 105
Barring, purple, in black fowls, 528
Baskets for shipping eggs for hatching,
585
Beak (the jaws of gallinaceous birds),
structure of, in different kinds of
poultry, 175
Bean, the small knob at the tip of the
upper mandible of the waterfowl
598
Beard, a tuft or fringe of feathers at
the throat, sometimes extending to
the ears
Beef scrap, 199
Beet molasses
Beet pulp, 197
Beet tops, 195
Belgian meat types, 380
Bib, a biblike patch of color on the
breast, as in Blue Swedish Ducks
Bill, the jaws of waterfowl
Bird, defined, 5
Black color, faults of, 527; mating to
produce, 527; occurrence of, in
white birds, 525
Blackhead, a form of liver disease in
turkeys, in which the skin of the head
and neck turns very dark purple
Black-red color pattern in fowls, de-
scription of the, 357; mating, 507;
modified forms of, 512
Black-red type, undercolor in the, 530
Black rot, a gangrenous disease of the
comb
Black Spanish, 366
Black Sumatras, 533
Black-white color pattern in fowls, de-
scription of the, 361
Black-white color types, mating, 518 ;
undercolor in, 533
Blade, the broad rear section of a single
comb
Blood meal and dried blood, 199
Body, the trunk. In Standard nomen-
clature, that section of the body be-
tween the breast and the fluff. See
Breast
Body and germ, relations of, 459
Bone cutters, 169
Bones, dry, 203; green, 199
Booted, having feathers on the feet
and shanks
Boston, first poultry show at, 18, 535
Boswell, description of early poultry
houses, 108
Bourbourg Fowl, 423
Boxes for shipping dressed poultry,
322; for shipping eggs, 327; for
shipping eggs for hatching, 585
Boxing, a term used by game fanciers
to describe a beak with upper man-
dible shutting closely over the lower
one
Braekel, 383; illustrated, 384
Brahmas, 391; Dark, described, 392;
illustrated, 392, 493; Light, de-
scribed, 393; illustrated, 393, 495,
519
POULTRY CULTURE
Brahmaputras, 385
Bran, buckwheat, 191 ; corn, 187; oat,
188: rice, 192; wheat, 185
Brassiness, 525
Brassy, yellowish, applied especially to
white plumage with a pronounced
yellow tinge
Breakdown, a condition of partial pa-
ralysis in which a bird is unable to
stand in a natural, upright position
Breast, crooked, 341
Breast, the front of the body of a bird,
the depth being measured from the
neck to the forward point of the
keel bone, the width from shoulder
to shoulder of the folded wings,
and the fullness by the curvature of
these lines
Breda, 424
Breed, defined
Breeder, work of the, 475
Breeding, conditions of practice in, 2;
improvement of egg production by,
492; rule of good practice in, 486
Breeding quality, effect of age upon, 487
breeds, divisions and relations of, 70
Breeds, influence of improved, 15;
laying, 353
Bresse, 380
Brewer’s grains, 189
Lricked-up set-kettle, illustrated, 39
Broilers, description of, 303; growing,
433 packing, 323
Bronchitis, analogous to same disease
in human beings
Brooder houses, 151; illustrated, 42,
47, 52, 124, 149, 151-152, 276
Brooders, coops for indoor, 132; kinds
of, 277
Broodiness, 242; relation of, to egg
production, 297
Brooding temperatures, 275, 280
Broom-corn seed, 192
Brown eggs, 326
Buckeye, description and illustrations
of, 416; compared with other breeds
of its class, 421
Bucks County Fowls, 397
Buckwheat, 191
Buff color, description of, 397; mating
for, 513
Buff-colored birds, undercolor in, 532
Bumblefoot, a foot having a corn or
an abscess which causes lameness,
340
Buttermilk, 201
Buying poultry on approval, 581
By-products, use of, as poultry foods. 178
INDEX
Cabbage, 195
Campines, 370; illustrated, 371
Candling, testing eggs before a light
to determine their fitness for food
purposes
Canker, a term applied indiscriminately
to catarrhal ulcers, cheesy mucus
deposits, diphtheritic patches, or any
whitish or yellowish matter appear-
ing about the eyes, nostrils, or mouth,
or in the mouth or throat of a bird
Cap, caplike dark markings on the
head, as in Indian Runner Ducks
Cape, in fowls of the ermine color
pattern the semicircular patch of
black-and-white feathers between
the shoulders, concealed by the long
hackle feathers when the bird stands
erect
Capital, relation of, to operations, 27
Caponizing, 309
Car and track for distributing food,
illustrated, 50
Carbohydrates, 179
Carts for poultry work, 37, 38, 56, 170
Case count, count by the case, without
inspection, grading, and deduction
for inferior andbad eggs. See Loss-off
Castilian fowls, 363
Catarrh, 340
Cats, exhibits of, at poultry shows, 550;
protection of poultry from, 274, 282
Causes of disease, 338
Census of 1840, poultry statistics in, 24
Center, in descriptions of plumage, the
open ground of a single-laced feather
Change, effect of, on egg production,
2
Bee balancing of, in breeding,
484; correlation of, 471; essential,
482; latent, 467; present, 467; rela-
tive value of, in breeding, 483; sub-
stantial, 482; superficial, 483
Charcoal, 203
Check, the trade term for a cracked
egg not leaking
Cheek, the side of the head, particu-
larly of a plain-feathered head, as in
ducks and geese
Cheese, 201
Chick, development of the, in incuba-
tion, illustrated, 261; helping, out of
shell, 252
Chicken, a young land bird of either
sex; applied mostly when the sex
cannot be distinguished or is imma-
terial
Chicken corn, 195
599
Chicken pox, a skin disease of the
head characterized by ulcerous warts,
340
Chilled eggs, 130, 250
China, importations of fowls from, 14
China Geese, Brown, 456; illustrated,
454; White, 456; illustrated, 453
Chinese corn, 195
Chinese poultry, supposed origin of, 12
Chittagong, 391
Cholera, the common name for virulent
hot-weather diseases. True fowl
cholera is very rare in America.
Fowl typhoid, infectious leuczmia,
and bacterial enteritis are the dis-
eases usually given the name of
cholera, 339
Chop, corn, 186
Cinnamon Cochins, 387
Circulars for fancy trade, 581
Cities, relation of, to poultry produc-
tion, 78
Clams, 200
Classification, economic, of fowls, 70;
geographic, of fowls, 346; of poultry
at exhibitions, 542
Clay soils, 76
Cleaning eggs, 324
Clean-legged, not feathered on shanks
and feet
Cleanliness in incubation, 248; relation
of, to egg production, 297
Climate, relation of, to poultry keep-
ing, 74
Close breeding, 484
Close-heeled, standing straight, with
heels close together; opposed to
knock-kneed
Closets, roosting, 159
Cloth, cotton, in poultry houses, 127
Cloth shades for chicks, 270
Clovers, 196
Clubby, opposite of reachy. See Reach
Cochin China, 391
Cochins, 387; Buff, illustrated, 388,
529; Partridge, illustrated, 497;
White, illustrated, 498
Cock, an adult male fowl; in exhibition
classification, a male one year old
or over. Compounds: turkey cock,
guinea cock, cock pheasant
Cockerel, a young cock; in exhibition
classification, a male under a year old
Cockerel house, 153
Cold brooders, 277
Cold houses, 114
Colds, 340
Cold storage, 62
“600
Collection of poultry products, 330
Collective selection, 481
College poultry exhibitions, 553
Colony farming, 40
Colony houses, illustrated, 41, 45, 87,
134
ealany systems, 81; illustrated, 35-39,
)
Color, effect of age on, 554
Color matings of poultry, 507; sorting
eggs for, 326
Colorado Agricultural College poultry
houses, illustrated, 125
Comb, a naked, fleshy growth on the
head of a fowl. The principal types
of combs are the single comb, a thin,
upright, serrated comb; the rose
comb, a broad, flat-topped comb hav-
ing typically a well-developed spike
at the rear; the pea comb, a comb
with three well-defined rows of small
protuberances parallel to its long
axis; the forked comb, a V-shaped
comb; the leaf comb, a V comb in
which the parts are thin and flat;
the antler comb, a Vcomb having
the parts branched like antlers; the
strawberry comb, a small, round rose
comb; the cup comb, a leaf comb in
which the parts are joined near the
base, forming a cup
Comb, an index to laying, 472; rela-
tions of the, to methods, 66, 72;
symptoms in disease, 340
Combinations in poultry culture, 61
Comfort, relation of, to egg production,
294
Commercial features of shows, 536
Commercialism, influence of, 23
Comparison judging, 542
Compensation principle in breeding,
484
Competition as a factor in exhibitions,
538
Condiments, 214
Conditioning exhibition poultry, 555
Conjunctivitis, sore eyes usually fol-
lowing a cold; early stage of keratitis
Connecticut, turkey growing in, 58
Connecticut Agricultural College,
brooder houses at, illustrated, 149;
colony houses at, illustrated, 132;
Pekin Ducks at, 502
Constitution, a matter of inheritance,
266; relation of, to development of
type, 472; relation of, to egg pro-
duction, 296
Constitutional causes of disease, 338
POULTRY CULTURE
Contagious diseases, 339
Cook houses, illustrated, 38
Cooling dressed poultry, 319; eggs in
incubators, 25
Codperation in selling poultry prod-
ucts, 335
Coops, ancient and modern, illustrated,
106, 131; decorating, at poultry shows,
550; for indoor brooders and growing
chicks, 132; for live market poultry,
324; for shipping fancy poultry, 584
Corn, 185
Corn, a thickening of the skin on the
sole of the foot, due to abrasion
Cornell trap nests, 163
Cornell University, features of poultry
keeping at, 136, 170, 270, 272; Cornell
University rations for poultry, 230
Cornfields, poultry in, 270
Cornish Indian Game, 350; Dark, il-
lustrated, 348; Red-Laced, illustrated,
351; White, illustrated, 350
Corn leaves, feeding green, 195
Correlation of characters, 471
Correspondence in selling fancy poul-
try, 581
Cotton cloth for windows and doors,
113
Cattoncloth front in northerly latitudes,
137
Cotton fish netting as a substitute for
wire netting, 557
Cotton seed, 192
Cotton tail, a tail showing much unde-
sirable white, especially at the base
Courtes Pattes, 382
Coverts, feathers which partly cover
large, stiff feathers, as wing coverts,
tail coverts
Cowpeas, 194
Crabs, 200
Cracked corn, 186; eggs in incubators,
258
Cramming, 213, 308 .
Crate feeding, 233, 307
Creameries, eggs, handled by, 331
Creamy, creamy white, 525
Creepers, 382
Crest, a tuft of feathers on the head;
relation of large, to methods, 66, 72
Crevecceur, 381
Crop, function of, 174
Crops, differences in, 175
Crop-bound, having an impaction of
food in the crop
Cross, to breed together individuals of
different varieties or breeds
Crossbred, produced by cross breeding
INDEX
Crossbred poultry, exhibitions of, 552
Crower, a cock or cockerel as used by
market poultrymen, particularly a
cockerel
Crow head, a pinched, peaked-looking
head with poor development of comb
and wattles
Cuckoo-colored, barred gray and white
Cuckoo Leghorns, 362
Cucumbers, 198
Cull, a waster, a specimen of such in-
ferior quality as to be unfit for exhi-
bition or for breeding purposes. In
market poultry, the poorest grade of
salable stock, 320
Curd, 202
Curl, the two recurved tail coverts of a
drake
Cushion, a conspicuous elevation of the
feathers of the rump of a hen or pul-
let, caused by the length and texture
of the feathers
Cuts in score-card judging, 568
Cutters, bone, 169; hay, 169; root, 169
Cygnet, a young swan
Damage to poultry in transit, liability
for, 581
Daw eye, an eye having pinkish-yellow
glints. Originally a gray eye like that
of a jackdaw
Decimal score card, 571; decimal sys-
tem of score-card judging, 568
Deck feathers, a name sometimes given
to the two upper main tail feathers
of a fowl
Deformed types, 424
Depth of poultry house, 118
Dewlap, a pendulous fold of skin on
the throat, directly under the beak or
bill. In turkeys which have not lat-
eral wattles this skin is commonly
called the wattle
Diet, effect of change in, 295
Dietetic causes of disease, 338
Digestion coefficients, 181
Digestive organs of poultry, 172
Diphtheritic roup, analogous to diph-
theria in human beings
Dirty eggs, market for, 325
Disease symptoms. 337, 339
Dislocating neck, killing by, illustrated,
312
Disqualification, a fault which debars a
specimen from competition; effect
of, on value, 582
Distemper, a severe cold, commonly
applied to hot-weather colds
601
Distribution of poultry products, 330
Disturbances, effect of, on growth, 288 ;
effect of, on laying, 291
Dogs, control of, 282; exhibits of, at
poultry shows, 550
Dominance, 467
Dominique Leghorn, 362
Dominiques. See American Dominiques
Dorkings, 378; Dark, illustrated, 380;
Silver Gray, illustrated, 379, 494, 501
Double-mating system, 491, 509, 534
Dough carts, illustrated, 37, 170
Down, rudimentary feathers. See
Feather
Drainage, 76
Drake, a male duck
Dressed poultry, exhibits of, at shows,
5493 judging, 574
Dressing poultry, 311, 333
Drinking vessels, 166
Drooped wings, wings habitually held
in a drooping position; common in
young stock that is ill-nourished or
lacking in vitality
Droppings boards, 158
Dry bone, 203
Dry houses, 104
Dry mash, 219
Dry packing, 321
Dry picking, 316
Dub, to cut off the comb and wattles,
and sometimes also the ear lobes
Duck, the common name of the duck
species; especially applied to the
female
Duck-footed, having very short or de-
formed hind toes
Duck growing, 48; overproduction in,
63
Duckling, a young duck
Ducks, green, 304; height of fence for,
96; laying habits of, 130, 160; rations
for, 234; varieties of: Aylesbury, 441;
illustrated, 503; Blue Swedish, 443;
illustrated, 441; Blue Termonde,
443; Call, 448; Cayuga, 442; illus-
trated, 440; common, 449; Crested
White, 448; Duclair-Rouen, 441;
Indian Runner, illustrated, 446;
Mallard, illustrated, 438; Merchtem,
442; Muscovy, 444; illustrated, 443-
444; Pekin, 443; illustrated, 442, 502,
504; Penguin, 447; Rouen, illus-
trated, 439, 505; color selection of,
534
Duckwing Leghorns, 361, illustrated,
362
Du Mans fowls, 381
602
Durability of poultry houses, 127
Durra, 195
Dust bath, 167, 342
Dutch Everyday Layers, 373
Dysentery, a severe diarrhea with
bloody discharges
Ear lobe, a fold of bare, enameled skin
below the ear of a fowl; injury to the,
6
Be nade features in poultry houses,
126
Economic values of exhibition poultry,
577
Educational features of poultry shows,
536
Ege appearance of fertile, 249; crop,
effect of poor hatching season on,
65; description of an, 238; develop-
ment of an, 289
Egg-bound, unable to extrude a full-
grown egg
Egg eating, a vice, 342
Egg farming, 32
Egg production, 289; mating fowls for,
492
Eggs, analyses of, 202 ; boxes and cases
for, 327; colors of, 326; cooling, in
incubators, 258; effect on, of chilling
during incubation, 250; exhibits of,
at shows, 549; as food, 31 ; for hatch-
ing, guaranty of fertility of, 582; in-
cubating cracked, 258; infertile, as
poultry food, 247; influence of male
on production of, 494; judging, 574;
methods of shipping, 585; number
of, in setting, 246; preparation of,
for market, 325; properties of, 10;
relation of size of, to size of bird,
492; selection of, for hatching, 245;
sizes of, 326; testing, 248, 259; treat-
ment of, at hatching time, 251, 263;
turning, in incubators, 258; weights
of, 327
Egg type, 71, 472
Egyptian corn, 195
Electric regulators for incubators and
brooders, 281
Enamel, the smooth, glossy surface of
the ear lobe of a fowl
English Games, illustrated, 347
English meat types, 377
English type of Leghorn, 356
Ensilage, 196
Enteritis, inflammation of the small
intestines, 339
Ermine color pattern, mating the, 520;
undercolor in the, 533
POULTRY CULTURE
Erminette, 520
Estaires, 423
Ethics of conditioning exhibition poul-
try, 560
European meat types, 376
Excelsior for packing eggs, 585
Exercise, relation of, to egg production,
296; relation of, to feeding, 209
Exhibition pen, 543
Export style of packing poultry, 321
Extensive methods, 79
Extensive systems, 87
Eye, color of, as an indication of vigor,
473
Face, the side of the head, especially
when bare, as in gallinaceous poultry
Factors in score-card judging, 568
Factory methods, 33
Faking, 557
Fancy poultry, profits in, 578; status
of, 59
Fantail, a tail spread perpendicularly,
also called rudder tail
Farm methods, 35, 80
Farmer’s colony house, illustrated, 140
Fasting before killing, 311
Fat, effects of excessive, 209
Fats, 179
Fattening, methods of, 301
Fattening and killing houses, illus-
trated, 149
Fattening rations, 233
Fattening sheds for ducks, illustrated, 53
Faverolles, illustrated, 423
Feather, a typical feather, having quill,
shaft, and web. Feathers on different
parts of a bird are of different forms.
As distinguished from a typical fea-
ther a down feather is hairlike, with-
out discernible quill, while a stub, or
stub feather, shows quill and web
but in rudimentary form
Feather eating, 342
Feathers, a by-product, 10; care of
marketable, 324; selling, 334
Feeding, forced, 213; methods of, 208 ;
need of practice in, 2; poultry at
shows, 564
Feeding habits of poultry, 209
Feed mixer, 169
Feed room, 167
Feed troughs, 163
Fences, 95
Fertile egg, appearance of a, 249
Fertility, 234; guaranties of, 582; pe-
riod of, 489; relation of, to vitality,
240
INDEX 603
Financing a show, 539
Finishing table poultry, 301
Fireless brooders, 277
Fish, fresh, 200
Fish netting as a substitute for wire
netting, 557
Fish scraps, 200
Fishtail comb, a single comb that
splits at the rear
Flax meal, 193
Flaxseed, 192
Flesh of poultry, composition of the,
172; relation of color of, to quality,
497
Flights, the functional feathers of the
wing, primaries and secondaries
Floats, the trade name for eggs in
which the embryo has started and,
in candling, appears before the light
as a floating spot
Flock, size of a, 84, 273
Floor dimensions, 116
Floor levels, 125
Floor materials, 127
Flour, low-grade, 184; in mashes, 216;
rice, 192
Fluff, downy plumage; applied to the
downy web at the quill end of a typi-
cal feather, and also to the feathers
of the abdomen of a gallinaceous
bird, which are all fluffy and collec-
tively are called the fluff
Fluke, a species of intestinal worm
Folding coop, illustrated, 107
Food requirements of poultry, 172
Foods, common, 178; mineral, 203;
natural, 175; proprietary, 210
Forcing, 212
Foreign color, in color varieties, any
color not required in the established
pattern; false color; foul color
Foundation stock, 67
Fowl, definition, 5; original type of, 344
Fowls, economic classification of, 70;
height of fence for, 96; style of
packing for export of, 321; when
to market, 304
French and Belgian meat types, 380
French Cuckoo, 382
Fresh-air movement, 112;
requirement in houses, 104
Friesland fowls, 372
Frizzles, 425
Frostbites, 341
Frosting, irregular and objectionable
edgings or tracings of white or light
color on black or dark ground color
Fryer, 303
principal
Fuel values of foods, 180
Full-blood, purebred
Furnished, having male characters fully
developed
Gallinaceous birds, feeding habits of,
175
Gallus Bankiva, 344
. Galton’s law, 468
Game fowls, 347
Gander, a male goose
Gapes, a disease in which the charac-
teristic symptom is gaping, caused
by gapeworms obstructing the wind-
pipe
Gastritis, acute indigestion
Gates, 106
Geese, nests for, 247; rations for, 237;
varieties: African, 456; illustrated,
455; China, 456; illustrated, 453-454;
common, 449; Egyptian, 458; Emden,
451; illustrated, 450; Pomeranian,
450; Roman, 449; Sebastopol, 458 ;
Toulouse, 452; illustrated, 451; Wild,
457; illustrated, 452
Geese, fattening, as a business, 55
General-purpose type, description of
the, 71; Continental European, 423
Germ, of an egg, 238; relations of
body and, 459; vitality of a, 249
Gills, the wattles
Gizzard, note on, 174
Glass in poultry houses, 127
Gluten products, 187
Going light, becoming emaciated with-
out pronounced symptoms of disease
Goose, the common name of the goose
species; especially applied to the
female
Goose growing, 54; features of, illus-
trated, 56
Gosling, a young goose
Goslings, growth of, illustrated, 285;
rations for, 237
Grade, strictly, a bird having one pure-
bred parent and one of mixed blood,
but the term is usually applied to a
bird having one parent line (usually
the male line) purebred and the other
of mixed blood
Grading, dressed poultry, 320; live
poultry for market, 324
Grapes, 198
Grass clippings, 195
Gray eggs, 326
Green bone, 203
Green ducks, 304
Green food, 213
604.
Green geese. 305
Grit, function of, 174, 203; in commer-
cial mixed feeds, 211
Groats, buckwheat, 191
Grooming and faking, difference be-
tween, 557
Growth, effect of check in, on laying,
291; rate of, 284
Guineas, 436; rations for, 234
Hackle, the hackle feathers,— the long,
narrow feathers on the neck of a fowl
Half-barrel nests, illustrated, 244
Iamburgs, 368; Silver-Spangled, illus-
trated, 373-374
Hammonton, N.J., a broiler center, 43
Hampton Institute, colony system at,
illustrated, 90
Ilangers, the posterior, or
hackle feathers
Hatches, causes of poor, 264
Hatching, conditions of good, 252
Hatching time, treatment of eggs at, 251
l1awk-colored fowls, 14
Hay, 197; cutters, 169
Heat, function of, in incubation, 240;
regulation in artificial brooding, 276
Ileight, of fences, 96; of poultry houses,
118; of roosts, 157
Hempseed, 195
Hen, an adult female fowl; in exhibi-
tion classification, a bird one year old
or over. Also in compounds, turkey
hen, pea hen, etc.
Hen-feathered, a term applied to cocks
lacking distinctive male plumage
Henny, hen-feathered
Hillside, poultry house on, 154
Hinges, 101
Hock, the joint at the junction of the
feathered thigh and the scaly shank
of a bird
Hoppers, feed, 165
Horn comb, a small, fleshy comb hav-
ing two upright spikes at the rear
Hotels as buyers of eggs, 330
Houdan, 381, illustrated, 382
Houses, 102
Hulls, cottonseed, 193; rice, 192
Huttegem fowl, 424
Ilygiene and sanitation, 337
saddle,
Ice packing for poultry, 321
Improved types, quality of, 479
Inbreeding, 485
Incubation, antiquity of, 17; develop-
ment of the chick in, 261; period of,
250
POULTRY CULTURE
Incubator, common errors in operating,
264; first practical, 17; management
of, when hatching, 263 ; routine work
of operating, 258; selection of, 254;
ventilation in, 259
Incubator cellars, 256; illustrated, 47,
254
Indigestible food materials, action of,
176
Indoor brooders, coops for, 132
Influenza, contagious catarrh
Inheritance, constitution and, 266; phe-
nomena of, 467
Inland duck farms, 51
Insecticides, 342
Institutes at poultry shows, 552
Intensive methods, 79; illustrated, 32-—
34, 83-84, 272; application of, to
roaster growing, 92; not adapted to
large operations, 28
Intensive systems, advantages and dis-
advantages of, 89
Intermediate matings, 491
Internal parasites, 341
Jowa Agricultural College, colony
houses at, 91; fattening houses at,
150; long houses at, illustrated, 145
Italian fowls, 355, 360
Japan, food of fowls in, 178
Javas, 404
Jersey Blue, 397
Jews, relation of, to live-poultry trade,
3
ee influence of, on the poultry
industry, 19
Judges, compensation of, 539; qualifi-
cations of, 541
Judging, definition and objects of, 566;
methods of, 542, 577; ring, 551
Jungle fowl, 344
Kafir corn, 194
Kansas Agricultura] College ration, 229
Keel, the lower lengthwise line of the
body ; strictly the ridge on the breast-
bone, but technically, the outline of
the bird from the anterior point of
the breastbone to the vent
Keratitis, a disease of the eye
Killing, methods of, 311
Killing houses, illustrated, 149
Knob, the round, horny protuberance
at the juncture of the upper mandible
and the skull of African and China
Geese
Knock-kneed, having the hocks bent
inward
INDEX
Laced, having the feathers marked with
a band or stripe around the edge.
The term is used only with reference
to ordinary and wide feathers. The
long, narrow feathers of the hackles
of cocks and hens and the saddles of
cocks, when marked in this way, are
said to be striped
La Fléche, 380
Lakenvelder, 368; illustrated, 369
Lamp brooders, 278
Langshans, Black, 389; illustrated, 390,
524; White, 390; illustrated, 391, 524
Laws of heredity, 468
Laying types, 352, 368, 447
Leaf comb. See Comb
Leaves for litter, 209
Leghorns,355; and Minorcas compared,
365; Black, illustrated, 360; Buff, 357;
illustrated, 358, 529-531; Brown, 356;
illustrated, 356, 508-511; Cuckoo, or
Dominique, 362; Duckwing, 362;
illustrated, 362-363; Mottled (see
Ancona); Pile, 361; White, 359;
illustrated, 359, 521-523
Leg weakness, in healthy young birds,
lack of strength to carry weight
Length, of body in relation to table
properties, 500; of poultry houses, 119
Lettuce, 195
Lice, 342; prevention and treatment
of, 283
Light Brahma. See Brahmas
Lighting, candling
Light Sussex, 378
Limber neck, a symptom indicating
acute indigestion, ptomaine poison-
ing, or internal parasites
Lime breeding, 485
Limed eggs, eggs preserved in limewater
Linseed meal, 193
Literature, collections of, for exhibi-
tion, 552; influence of, 18
Litter, materials used for, 209
Little Compton, R.I., colony system
at, 35
Live poultry, shipping, 324
Lobsters, 200
Long Island duck farms, 49
Long poultry houses, illustrated, 122-
123, 145, 148
Lopped comb, a comb that from weak-
ness at the base falls to one side
Loss-off, a trade term for a sale of eggs
subject to candling by the purchaser,
and to deduction for inferior and bad
eggs
Low-grade flour, 184
605
Macdonald College, arrangement of
colony houses at, 92; poultry houses
at, illustrated, 135-136, 149
Madison Square Garden Show, arrange-
ment of classes at, 548 ; table showing
numbers of birds exhibited in various
classes at, 544
Magyar fowls, 368
Mail-order poultry trade, 578
Maine Agricultural College, poultry
houses at, illustrated, 137, 149
Maine Experiment Station, breeding
work at, 493; count of ovules at, 290;
observation at, on the relation of
growth to laying, 292; poultry houses
at, 132, 158
Maine Experiment Station rations, 22
Malay, relation of the, to Asiatic class,
384
Male, influence of, on egg production,
494
Male and female, relative value of, in
breeding, 477
Malines fowls, 424
Mallard Duck, 438
Malt sprouts, 189
Mangel-wurzel, 198
Mantes fowls, 381
Manufacturers’ directions for operating
incubators, 255
Manufacturing methods not suited to
poultry culture, 28
Manure, market for, 305
Marbled, having the colors distributed
as in marble; applied particularly to
the wings of barred fowls
Market, requirements of the, as to pick-
ing, 318; sorting poultry for, 324
Market products described, 30
Markets, extent of, 77
Maryland Experiment Station, poultry
building at, 254
Mash, 214
Massachusetts Agricultural College,
poultry buildings at, 148, 254, 276
Mating systems, 491
Meal, alfalfa, 197; barley, 188; blood,
199; broom-corn-seed, 192; clover,
197; corn, 187 ; cottonseed, 193; glu-
ten, 187 ; hominy, 187; linseed, 193;
meat, 199; pea, 194; sorghum seed,
192; soy bean, 194
Mealy, unevenly marked with specks
of another color or shade
Meat, of poultry as food, 31
Meat type defined, 71
Meat types, Asiatic, 384; European,
380
606
Mediterranean types and breeds, 352
Mendel’s law, 469
Method, defined, 79
Methods, of artificial brooding, 277; of
feeding, 208; of incubation compared,
242; of judging, 542, 567; of killing,
310; of packing, 321; of picking, 318;
of testing eggs, 249
Michigan Agricultural College, poultry
buildings at, 138-140, 146-147
Middlemen, relations of, to poultrymen,
275 329
Middlings, buckwheat, 191; corn, 187;
oat, 188; wheat, 184
Milk, 201
Millet, 194
Mill feeds, mixed, 190
Mineral elements in foods, 179; func-
tions of, in poultry nutrition, 203
Minnesota, cotton-front poultry house
in, illustrated, 117
Minorcas, 363; Black, illustrated, 364,
525; White, illustrated, 365
Mites, 342
Mixed feeds, 185, 190
Mixers for poultry food, 168
Moisture in incubation, 259
Molasses, beet, 197 :
Molting, relation of, to egg production,
298
Niece: 13; characteristics of, 346
Moors, introduction of fowls into Spain
by, 363 mo
Mossy, having traces of penciling on
parts of feathers which should be
clean-colored
Mottled, having feathers of two colors
without regular pattern, as in the
Houdan; also, having different shades
of a color in the same section of the
plumage
Moving poultry houses, illustrated, 38,138
Muffs, tufts of feathers at the sides of
the head
Muscovy Ducks, illustrated, 444
Mussels, 200
Natural feeding habits of poultry, 209;
natural selection, 478
Nests, 160, illustrated, 38, 160, 244, 247;
confining hens to, 246; materials for,
24
Neo bend introducing, 487
New York Show. See Madison Square
Garden ;
North Carolina Agricultural College,
poultry buildings at, 115, 134; trap
nests at, 164
POULTRY CULTURE
Nourishment, relation of, to egg produc-
tion, 293
Nursing, importance of, in the treat-
ment of disease, 340
Nutrient ratio, 180
Nutritive organs of birds, 172
Oatmeal, 187
Oats, 187
Oiled cloth, 113
Onion tops, 195
Onions, 197
Ontario Experiment Station, experiment
with whey at, 202; incubator house
at, 128
Ontario Experiment Station rations,
228
Open classes, 542
Open-front houses,
110, 114, 117
Orpingtons, 416; varieties: Black, illus-
trated, 417; Buff, illustrated, 418, 422,
529; Jubilee, 419; Spangled, 420;
White, illustrated, 419, 499
Ostriches, feeding habits of, 177; ra-
tions of, 235
Outcross, to bring in new blood, to
mate birds of a close-bred stock or
strain with birds of another family
of their variety
Ovaries, 289
Overcrowding, effects of, 268, 555
Overproduction of ducks, 62
Oviduct, 289
Ovules, number of, 290, 493
Oyster shells, 204
Oysters, 200
114; illustrated,
Packing, fancy poultry and eggs for
hatching, 584; market eggs, 327;
market poultry, 321
Painting, exhibition coops, 551; poul-
try houses, 129
Pair, of live birds for breeding or ex-
hibition, a male and a female; of
dressed poultry for exhibition, two
birds of the same sex
Parasites, external, 283, 342; internal,
341
Parti-colored, of two or more colors
Particulate selection, 481
Pasture, for poultry, 95; for geese, 237,
for goslings, 274
Pavloff fowls, 375
Peaches, 198
Pea comb. See Comb
Peafowls, 436; rations for, 234
Pea meal, 194
INDEX 607
Pears, 194 Plums, 198
Peas, 194 Plymouth Rocks, compared with other
Pebbled, having the surface uniformly
covered with small protuberances ;
applied especially to the upper sur-
face of a rose comb
Peculiarities of the fancy poultry trade,
578
Pekin Duck, 443; influence of, on duck
culture in America, 50 .
Pen, (1) one of the compartments of a
poultry house; (2) the birds kept in
one compartment ; (3) exhibition pen,
a male and four females matched for
exhibition; (4) breeding pen, a male
and his breeding mates. In descrip-
tions of stock in transactions in fancy
poultry a breeding pen, unless other-
wise specified, consists of a male and
four females
Penciled, marked with regular lines
in series, producing either multiple
lacing or very fine barring. Multiple-
laced feathers are described as
double-laced or triple-laced, accord-
ing to the pattern
Pennsylvania State College buildings,
Pens for fitting exhibition birds, 556
Pepper, 214
Perches. See Roosts
Periods, of artificial brooding, 282; of
fertility, 489; of incubation, 250; of
laying, 297
Petaluma, poultry methods at, illus-
trated, 40
Pet-stock exhibits at poultry shows, 550
Pheasants, 437; coops and runs for,
illustrated, 60-61; rations for, 234;
roosting habits of, 130
Pheenix Fowl, illustrated, 513
Piano-box houses, 134, 271
Picking, exhibition poultry, 562; mar-
ket poultry, 315; illustrated, 316
Pie melons, 198
Pigeons, at poultry shows, 550; con-
trasted with poultry, 7
Pile, a white fowl having (in the male)
the neck and back colored, that is,
capped with another color. The word
comes from Latin p//ews, a cap
Pile Leghorns, 361
Pinched tail, a tail that folds too closely
to look well
Pinfeather, a typical feather in the
early stages of growth
Pip, inflammation of the mouth
Pipe brooders, 278
breeds of their class, 420; varieties of:
Barred, 16, 398; illustrated, 400, 496,
517; Buff, illustrated, 403; Colum-
bian, illustrated, 404 ; Partridge, illus-
trated, 404, 511; Silver-Penciled,
404; illustrated, 514; White, 402;
illustrated, 401-402, 498, 500
Points, relation of scale of, to judging,
567
Polish, 368; illustrated, 336, 506
Polverrara fowl, 376
Pork scrap, 199
Posts, fence, 99
Potatoes, 197
Potential energy, 180
Poulard, a castrated pullet
Poulets de grains, 383
Poult, a young turkey
Poultry, definition of, 5; contrasted
with aérial birds, 7
Poultry keeper, definition of, 64
Prat fowl, 424
Prepotency, 465
Present characters, 467
Prices of fancy poultry and eggs, 583
Primaries, primary flights, the large
feathers on the first joint of the wing
Prizes, advertising value of, 536; sweep-
stakes, 548
Progressive selection, 481
Prolapse, prolapse of the oviduct
Proteids, 178
Protein, 179; cooked-meat products as
a source of, 200
Provender, 190
Provincial Breeding Station, British
Columbia, buildings at, illustrated,
81, 137, 141, 277
Pullet, an immature female fowl; in
exhibition classification, a bird under
one year old
Pumpkins, 198
Punch marker, a punch for making
identification marks in the webs be-
tween the toes of poultry ; also called
a poultry punch
Purebred, having blood lines pure,
having the blood of no other variety
Purple barring in black fowls, 528
Quarantine for poultry returning from
shows, 565
Range, temporary, 94
Rankin, James, note by, on habits of
ducks, 51; rations of, for ducks, 22
608
Rape, 195
Rapeseed, 195
Rate of growth in poultry, 284
Ratio, nutrient, 180
Ration, 206; power of poultry to bal-
ance, 179
Rations, effects of changing, 295 ; exam-
ples of, 220; for special purposes, 210
Rattling in the throat, a symptom of
sore throat
Reach, reachiness, reachy; applied
especially to Exhibition Games and
Game Bantams. A bird that, when
posed, will stretch upward, increasing
its height and still balancing itself
easily on its legs, has reach and is
reachy in proportion to its ability to
respond to efforts to make it stretch.
A bird that is not properly balanced
on its legs cannot reach. Such a bird
is said to be clubby
Recessiveness, 467
Redcap, 379
Red-dog flour, 216
Ked fowls, mating, 513; undercolor in,
Ked in white fowls, 525
Refuse food for poultry, 185
Regression from type, 475
Regularity, effect of, on egg production,
Reproduction, kinds of, 459
Reproductive organs, 289; functional
activity of the, 293
Reptiles, relation of, to birds, 174
Reversion, 467
Rhode Island Agricultural College,
poultry houses at, illustrated, 133, 142
Rhode Island Colony system, 81
Rhode Island Red, 82, 413; illustrated,
413-415, 528
Ribbon, the broad, lustrous blue-green
band on the wing of a Mallard or a
Rouen Duck
Rice, 191
Ring, a band of white on the neck of a
dark bird, as in Mallard and Rouen
drakes and Ringneck pheasants
Ring judging, 551
Ringy, having the bars on the feathers
so disposed that the light and dark
bars on contiguous feathers match
closely and form extended lines or
rings. This style of barring is also
called zebra barring
Roach back, a convex back in a bird
of a breed which has typically a
straight back or a concave back
POULTRY CULTURE
Roasters, 304; method of packing, 321
Roofs, styles of, 121
Rooster, a cock
Roosting closets, 159
Roosting coops, 109
Roosting sheds, 270
Roosts, 156; for turkeys, illustrated, 58
Root cutters, 169
Rose comb. See Comb
Rot, the trade name fora rotten egg
Rouen Ducks, 439, 534; illustrated,
502, 532
Roundworms, intestinal worms
houp, the common name for diseases
of the respiratory organs of poultry,
340
Roupy, having symptoms of roup, es-
pecially catarrhal symptoms
Rudder tail, a fantail
Rumpless fowls, 425
Run, a yard, especially a small yard
for poultry
Rye, 189
Saddle, the rear part of the back of a
cock, just before the tail
Sale classes at shows, 549
Salt in poultry food, 214
Sanitation, 337
Scabies, a skin disease of gallinaceous
poultry caused by the depluming
mite
Scalding, food, 216; poultry, 314
Scales of points, use of, in judging, 567
Scaly leg, a foot disease of gallinaceous
poultry caused by a mite which bur-
rows under and gradually destroys
the scales, 339
Score-card judging, 567
Scraps, beef, 199; fish, 200; pork, 199
Scratching-shed houses, 113; illus-
trated, 110, I15
Screenings, barley, 189; wheat, 184
Scrub, an ill-bred or ill-developed bird
Secondaries, the secondary flight
feathers
Selection, artificial and natural, 478;
of a breed or variety, 67; of eggs for
hatching, 245, 257; of an incubator,
254; of layers, 299; of poultry for
exhibition, 554; relative value of
characters in, 480; for shape in mat-
ing Standard poultry. 504; systems
of, 481
Serrated, having the edge regularly
notched. All single combs are ser-
rated
Serration, a point in a serrated comb
INDEX
Set-kettle for cooking feed, 168
Setting, number of eggs in a, 246
Sex, function of, 461; regulation of,
49°
Sexes, equality in transmission of char-
acters, 463; ratio of, in mating, 488 ;
relative value of, in breeding, 477;
separation of the, while growing,
287
Sexual reproduction, likeness in, 462
Shades, cloth, for chickens, 270
Shafting, objectionable prominence of
the shaft of a feather, caused by the
shaft (and sometimes a little of the
web near it) being lighter or darker
than the general surface of the
feather
Shafty, having a large amount of shaft-
ing in the plumage
Shanghais, 385
Shank, the leg between the foot and
the hock
Shape, standards of, 504; in table poul-
try, 499
Shaping dressed poultry, 320
Shell of the egg, 239
Shellfish, 201
Sherwood, a white half-Game American
fowl, rare
. Shingles, use of, 126
Shipping, dressed poultry, 321; fancy
poultry and eggs, 584; live market
poultry, 324; poultry to shows, 563
Shorts, 185
Shoulder, the highest part of the wing
Shrunken eggs, eggs having the con-
tents partly evaporated
Siberian Feather-Footed Fowl, 375
Sickle, a sickle feather, a feather hav-
ing the shape of asickle. The sickles
proper are the two long upper plumes
in the tail of a cock. The similar in-
ferior plumes are called the lesser
sickles
Side sprig, a small spike on the side
of a single comb
Silkies, 425
Single-mating system, 491
Singles, single entries, birds entered
separately for competition
Sitting hen, food of the, 248
Size, relation of, to utility, 482
Skim milk, 201
Skin, relation of color of, to quality of
flesh, 473
Slack crop, a pendulous crop, a crop
permanently distended and causing
deformity
609
Slip, a capon which develops some of
the male characters usually sup-
pressed by castration, 310
Slipped wing, a wing the primaries of
which cannot be properly folded, 506
Smut, irregular and objectionable edg-
ing or tracing of black or dark color
on white or light ground
Snow, effect of, on laying, 130
Soft-roaster growing, 45; illustrated,
44-47
Soils, 72, 76
Solid color, a single color, self color
(applied to a pattern); of uniform
shade (applied to a color)
Sorehead, chicken pox
Sorghum seed, 192
South Shore district, cooperation in the
335; fattening methods in the, 303
Soy beans, 194
Spangle, a large, regular spot at the
tip of a feather
Spanish, Black, illustrated, 367
Specializing, limitations of, 43
Speckled, irregularly marked with sev-
eral colors
Spike, of a comb, the rear point of a
rose comb
Spike, loss of a, 557
Spinach, 195
Splashed feather, a feather on which two
or more colors appear in patches, with
no tendency toward any regular pattern
Split comb. See Comb
Spot, the trade name for an egg with a
bad spot but not yet rotten
Sprouted oats, 188
Sprouts, malt, 189
Spur, the spine on the inside of the
shank of a cock. In the hen it is
usually rudimentary, but hens often
grow long spurs
Squirrel tail, a tail carried so high that
it projects beyond a perpendicular
at its junction with the back
Stag, a young gamecock
Staggy, hard-meated, like a stag, 310
Stale bread, 185
Standard, of the American Poultry
Association, 480
Standard bred, bred to conform to the
requirements of the American Poul-
try Association’s standards
Standard diagrams, 121
Standard mashes, 217
Standard shape, mating for, 504
Standard-size boxes for dressed poul-
try, 322
610
Standard-size poultry-house unit, 119
Standard style of exhibition coop, 551
Station, good pose, height, and reach
Steam power, effect of the development
of, on the poultry industry, 13
Steaming to remove feathers, 315
Sterility and extreme heavy laying, 494
Stern, the posterior part of the body;
used especially in descriptions of
Games in which, because of the short-
ness of the plumage, the outlines are
more discernible than in long-feath-
ered birds
Sticking poultry, 312; illustrated, 313
Stippled, evenly marked with fine dots
Stone poultry houses, illustrated, 102
Strain, a family having established race
character distinguishing it from other
stock of the same variety
Straw for litter, 209
Strawberry comb. See Comb
Striped, marked lengthwise with a long
central stripe. Sze Laced
Sugar beets, 198
Sultans, 425
Sumatras, Black, illustrated, 533
Sunflower seed, 194
Sunlight, in houses, 104; importance of,
77; testing eggs by. 249
Supply and demand, 62
Surrey fowl. See Sussex fowls
Sussex fowls, 378, 420
Swans, 458; rations for, 237
Sweepstakes prizes, 548
Symmetry, defined, 572
Symptoms of disease, 337
System, definition of, 79; in natural in-
cubation, 243
Systems of mating, 491 ; ofselection,4S1
Table poultry, finishing, 301; mating
for, 493; shape in, 499
Tail, the tail feathers, — main tail and
coverts
Tailless fowls, 425
Tapeworm, an intestinal parasite, 341
Tassel, a small crest, especially applied
to Game fowls
Telegony, 490
Temperature, for brooding, 275, 280;
of broody hens, 250; for incubation,
241; for keeping eggs for hatching,
245; of poultry houses, 104, 116
Tent coop, evolution of, illustrated, 105
Testers, egg, 171
Testing eggs, 248, 259
Thigh, the drumstick, the first fleshy
joint of the leg of a bird
POULTRY CULTURE
Thoroughbred, having type and breed
or variety characters well established
and of high quality
Thumb mark, a bulge in a single comb
immediately over the beak, as if
pressed out of shape with the thumb
Tick, a speck of foreign color; also, a
rudimentary stripe
Ties in judging, 573
Tight houses, 108
Tillinghast house, illustrated, 115
Tolman house, illustrated, 115
Tomatoes, 198
Tom turkey, a turkey cock
Topknot, a crest
Training birds for exhibition, 562
Transmission, of characters, 463; of
prepotency, 466
Transportation, 78
Trio, a male and two females; applied
to birds selected for exhibition or
for breeding
Troughs, feed, 163
Tuck, to draw up; applied to the car-
riage of the wing, which in repose
should be closely folded, with points
tucked well into the body feathers at
the rear
Turkeys, effects of foul ground on, 274;
fattening, 305; growing. 58; nests for,
247; rations for, 234; roosting habits
of, 130; varieties of: Buff or Red, 434;
Black, 432; illustrated, 58; Bronze,
430; illustrated, 58, 430, 434; Narra-
gansett, 431; illustrated, 432; Slate,
434; White, 433; illustrated, 58, 433;
Wild, 430
Turning eggs in incubation, 258
Twisted comb, a single comb that is
straight at the base but wrinkled at
the margin, making the serrations
point in different directions
Twisted feather, a feather (usually a
primary) having the quill so turned
in the skin (or flesh) that it does not
take its natural position. As a rule,
the feather is straight but turned in
its place
Type, definition of, 69 ; development of
American, 16; egg, 472; of original
fowl, 344; regression from, 475
Types, deformed, 424; of domestic
fowl, 346; European meat, 376; gen-
eral-purpose, 394; laying, 352; primi-
tive-crested, 375; relations of, to
conditions and methods, 66
Typhoid, fowl, analogous to typhoid in
human beings, 339
INDEX
Undercolor, 530
Uniformity in judging, 573
Upham, LD. A., originator of the Barred
Plymouth Rock, 398
Utility values, recognition of, in judg-
ing Standard poultry, 574
V comb. See Comb
Values, in exhibition poultry, 577; of
poultry in the United States, 25
Variability of egg yields, 298
Variation, beginning of, 461; sex, regu-
lator of, 461
Vegetables in mashes, 216
Vent, the posterior orifice
Vent gleet, a venereal disease of poul-
try, causing inflammation of the
cloaca and adjacent parts
Ventilation, affected by situation, 77;
effect on egg production, 295; in
incubation, 259; measuring, 262; in
tight houses, 111
Vigor, importance of, 209
Vitality, effect of laying on, 494; pres-
ervation of, in young poultry, 267;
relation of, to fertility, 240; relation
of, to reproduction, 464
Vulture hock, a hock having stiff feath-
ers extending beyond it, as in a vulture
Walks, raised, illustrated, 125
Walls of poultry structures, 125
Warm open-front houses, 114
Warm water and frostbite, 341
Warmth, in poultry-house construction,
128; for young poultry, 276
Washing exhibition birds, 559, 563
Waterfowl, natural feeding habits of, 177
Wattle, one of the two pendent folds of
skin at the side of the throat of a
fowl; also the loose carunculated
single fold of skin under the throat
of a turkey
Weaklings, elimination of, 260
Weaning young poultry, time for, 275
Weather, effect of, on shipments of
fancy poultry and eggs, 585
Weber Brothers’ rations for ducks, 236
Weight, of eggs, 327; poultry sold by,_
West Virginia Experiment Station,
poultry house at, illustrated, 141
West Virginia Experiment Station
ration, 229
Wheat, feeding value of, 182
Whey, 201
Whiptail, a small, closely folded tail
Whiskers, muffs
611
Whitecomb, applied to favus when it
affects the comb
White diarrhea, properly, the disease
caused by the infection of new-
hatched chickens with bacterium pul-
forum. Erroneously applied to many
cases of common diarrhea in which
the discharges are at first whitish
White of egg, 238
White eggs, 326
White fowls, mating. 525
White-red color pattern, 361
Whitewash, use of, 129
Willow, willow-colored, greenish yel-
low; applied in describing the color
of the shanks
Wing parts: wing bar, the bar across
the folded wing, formed by the cov-
erts ; wing bay, the triangular surface
of the secondaries of the folded
wing; wing bow, the upper part of
the wing, covered with small, soft
feathers; wing coverts, the small
feathers which conceal the quills of
the flight feathers
Winnebagos, 408
Wire fencing, 98
Wisconsin Agricultural College, poul-
try houses at, illustrated, 81, 117, 145
Wood, use of, in construction of poul-
try houses, 126
Worms, 34!
Wringing the neck, killing poultry by, 312
Wry tail, a tail turning permanently to
one side
Wyandottes, 406; compared with other
fowls of their class, 420; varieties of :
Black, illustrated, 410; Buff, illus-
trated, 410; Columbian, 412; illus-
trated, 412, 520; Golden-Laced, 408;
illustrated, 407 ; Partridge, 411; illus-
trated, 512; Silver-Laced, 406; illus-
trated, 406, 516; Silver-Penciled, 412;
illustrated, 411, 515; White, 409; il-
lustrated, 408, 501~502
Yard, area of, 97; use of.95
Yard, breeding, a male mated with a
large number of females. In buying
and selling fowls for breeding pur-
poses the regulation number of
females in a breeding yard is eight, —
twice the number ina pen. Exhibi-
tion yard, a male with more than
four females, — also called a display.
It is not customary for yards or dis-
plays to compete for prizes
Yolk of egg. 238