Skip to main content

Full text of "Elm leaf beetle and white-marked tussock moth"

See other formats


Q 


ucation   Department   Bulletin 


%J 
*    /CP/^1     I 


ublished  fortnightly  by  the  University  of  the  State  of  New  York 

as  second-class  matter  June  24,  1908,  at  the  Post  Office  at  Albany,  N.  Y.,  under 
the  act  of  July  16,   1894 


ALBANY,  N.  Y. 


JANUARY  15,  1912 


New  York  State  Museum 

JOHN  M.  CLARKK,  Director 
EPHRAIM  PORTER  FELT,  State  Entomologist 


^  Museum  Bulletin  156 

ELM  LEAF  BEETLE  AND  WHITE-MARKED 
TUSSOCK  MOTH 


BY 


if 


EPHRAIM  PORTER  FELTD.Pc. 


PAGE 

Introduction 5 

Elm  leaf  beetle 6 

Results  of  attack 7 

Food  plants 7 

Distribution 7 

Description 8 

Life  history 9 

Natural  enemies 10 

Preventive  measures..  10 


Remedial  measures 

White-marked  tussock  moth, 

Description 

Life  history  and  habits . . . 

Food  plants 

Natural  enemies 

Remedies 

Explanation  of  plates 

Index. . 


PAGE 
.  II 

•  14 

•  15 

•  15 

.  16 
.  16 
.  16 
.  19 

•  35 


ALBANY 

UNIVERSITY    OF    THE    STATE    OP    NEW    YORK 
1912 


Me2r-Api2-20oo 


EXCHANGE 


Neiv  York  State  Education  Department 

Science  Division,  April  4,  1912 


Hon.  Andrew  S.  Draper  LL.D. 

Commissioner  of  Education 

SIR  :  I  have  the  honor  to  submit  herewith  a  revision  of  our  State 
Museum  Bulletin  109  relating  to  the  elm  leaf  beetle,  the  tussock 
moth  and  their  depredations  upon  our  shade  trees.  The  demand 
for  information  on  these  insect  pests  is  large  and  the  last 
edition  of 'the  bulletin  is  now  exhausted.  I  therefore  recommend 
this  manuscript  for  publication. 

Very  respectfully 

JOHN  M.  CLARKE 

Director 

STATE   OF   NEW  YORK 

EDUCATION   DEPARTMENT 

COMMISSIONER'S  ROOM 

Approved  for  publication  this  $th  day  of  April 


Commissioner  of  Education 


Education   Department   Bulletin 

Published  fortnightly  by  the  University  of  the  State  of  New  York 

Entered  as  second-class  matter  June   24,  1908,  at  the   Post   Office  at  Albany,  N.  Y.,  under 

the  act  of  July  16,  1894 

No.  511  ALBANY,  N.  Y.  JANUARY  15,  1912 

New  York  State  Museum 

JOHN  M.  CLARKE,  Director 
EPHRAIM  PORTER  FELT,  State  Entomologist 

Museum  Bulletin  156 

ELM  LEAF  BEETLE  AND  WHITE-MARKED  TUSSOCK 

MOTH 


BY 

EPHRAIM   PORTER  FELT  D.^Sc. 

The  elm  leaf  beetle  and  the  white-marked  tussock  moth  must 
be  ranked  among  the  most  important  leaf  feeders  affecting  the 
shade  trees  of  cities  and  villages  in  New  York  State.  They 
have  been  responsible  for  widespread  injury  to  thousands  of 
trees  in  recent  years,  while  earlier  experience  shows  that  we 
must  reckon  with  these  species  if  we  would  preserve  the 
beauty  of  our  trees.  Experience  in  the  past  has  demonstrated 
beyond  all  question  the  practicability  of  checking  both  of  these  leaf 
feeders  by  spraying,  an  operation  which  is  not  very  costly  if 
modern  apparatus  be  employed.  We  are  forced  to  conclude 
therefore  that  extensive  injury  by  either  of  these  pests  must  be 
attributed  to  indifference  or  culpable  neglect  rather  than  in- 
ability, despite  the  fact  that  many  appear  very  eager  to  take  up 
the  warfare  at  a  time  when  the  ravages  are  most  apparent  and 
unfortunately  when  repressive  measures  can  be  employed  to 
very  little  advantage. 

There  is  a  tendency  on  the  part  of  many  private  individuals 
to  attribute  their  woes  to  the  neglect  of  adjacent  shade  trees  on 
public  streets,  and  conversely  municipal  authorities  are  prone  to 
state  that  injury  to  public  trees  is  due  to  the  pests  swarming 
thereto  from  neglected  private  grounds.  The  facts  of  the  case 
are  that  both  of  these  insects  are  very  local  in  habit.  This  is  a 

333209 


YpRj£    STATE    JV^USEUM 

• 

necessity  in  the  case  of  the  tussock  moth,  because  the  female  is 
wingless  and  as  a  consequence  the  species  relies  for  dissemina- 
tion on  the  very  limited  crawling  powers  of  the  caterpillar  or 
upon  being  carried  by  other  agencies.  The  elm  leaf  beetle,  on 
the  contrary,  flies  readily,  but  for  some  reason  or  other  it  is  very 
local  in  its  habits  and  not  infrequently  one  may  see  magnificent 
trees  infested  with  hordes  of  beetles  and  larvae,  while  within  a 
block,  sometimes  within  50  feet,  other  elms  may  be  practically 
free  from  the  pest.  These  facts  are  of  greatest  importance  to 
all  interested  in  the  welfare  of  shade  trees,  since  they  demon- 
strate beyond  question  the  possibility  of  protecting  the  trees  on 
our  public  streets,  irrespective  of  what  is  done  by  private 
citizens,  or  conversely,  the  practicability  of  keeping  the  pest  in 
check  on  private  grounds,  even  though  there  is  little  or  no  re- 
pressive work  upon  those  adjacent. 

Elm  leaf  beetle 

Galerucella  luteola  Mull 

The  ravages  of  this  dangerous  enemy  to  elms  has  been  par- 
ticularly severe  in  recent  years.  The  damage  has  doubtless  been 
accentuated  in  numerous  instances  by  exceptionally  dry  weather 
and  possibly  by  extremely  low  winter  temperatures.  These  two 
factors  afford  no  adequate  explanation  for  the  great  increase  in 
the  number  of  injured  trees,  and  particularly  for  the  general  de- 
struction of  the  foliage  so  conspicuous  in  many  communities  in 
1910  and  1911.  It  is  very  probable  that  the  extension  of  electric 
car  service  and  the  more  general  use  of  automobiles  have  been 
of  material  service  in  disseminating  a  local  and  exceedingly 
prolific  insect,  since  both  of  these  vehicles  usually  traverse  tree- 
lined  streets  and  afford  abundant  opportunities  for  the  collection 
and  dissemination  of  the  beetles  and  thus  greatly  increase  the 
damage  along  favorite  routes  of  travel. 

This  pest  was  so  abundant  and  injurious  from  1896  to  1899 
in  the  cities  of  Albany  and  Troy  as  literally  to  compel  some 
action  or  a  very  large  proportion  of  the  elms  would  have  been 
destroyed.  The  insect  made  such  headway  in  these  cities  that 
it  ruined  or  killed  about  3000  elms  before  the  end  of  1900,  and  it 
is  more  than  probable  that  at  least  1000  additional  succumbed 
the  following  decade.  The  earlier  spraying  against  this  pest 
produced  for  the  most  part  very  satisfactory  results,  while  the 
treatment  in  recent  years  has  given  indifferent  returns  in  man}' 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE   AND    WHITE-MARKED   TUSSOCK    MOTH  7 

instances.  An  examination  of  conditions  in  several  communities 
in  the  summer  of  1911  forced  us  to 'the  conclusion  that  most  of 
the  poor  results  following-  spraying  were  due  to  careless  or 
slovenly  work.  It  was  a  rather  common  occurrence  to  find  the 
lower  limbs  fairly  well  sprayed,  while  the  upper  branches  were 
almost  untouched  by  the  poison  and,  as  a  consequence,  severely 
injured  by  the  beetle. 

Dead  foliage  in  midsummer,  a  weakened  or  dying  condition 
of  the  trees,  and  the  vacant  spaces  formerly  occupied  by  elms, 
are  in  most  instances  the  direct  result  of  injury  by  this  per- 
nicious beetle,  though  all  conversant  with  the  situation  must 
admit  that  leaking  gas  and  electricity  have  killed  some  trees 
in  many  communities.  The  number  destroyed  by  these  latter 
two  agencies  is  small  compared  to  those  succumbing  to  insect 
depredations.  Old  age  has  been  advanced  by  some  as  a  reason 
for  the  death  of  many  elms.  This  is  hardly  an  adequate  explana- 
tion, since  many  'trees  which  have  perished  were  comparatively 
young.  Authentic  records  show  that  the  American  elm  may 
live  from  150  to  200  years.  Under  favorable  conditions  it 
should  thrive  for  at  least  a  century  and  in  many  instances  for 
a  century  and  a  half.  It  is  lamentable  that  so  many  magnifi- 
cent elms,  representing  the  growth  of  several  generations,  and 
in  many  instances  occupying  commanding  positions  and  addine 
greatly  to  the  beauty  and  value  of  the  adjacent  property,  should 
be  destroyed  within  a  few  years  by  an  insect  which  may  be 
controlled  at  a  comparatively  small  expense. 

Results  of  attack.  Elms  losing  two  crops  of  leaves  a  season 
for  three  or  four  years  are  invariably  seriously  affected  and  some 
at  least  may  die.  The  injury  is  almost  as  severe  if  the  first  crop 
of  leaves  is  destroyed  so  late  that  very  little  new  foliage  de- 
velops the  latter  part  of  the  season.  This  condition  was  rather 
general  with  American  elms  in  1911  and  may  have  resulted  in  part 
from  the  weakened  condition  of  the  trees,  an  outcome  of  earlier 
injuries. 

Food  plants.  This  leaf  feeder  displays  a  marked  preference 
for  the  more  tender  foliage  of  the  English  and  Scotch  elms, 
though  after  the  beetle  has  become  abundant,  it  is  frequently  exceed- 
ingly destructive  to  the  American  elm.  Its  operations  on  this 
latter  tree  have  been  especially  severe  in  the  city  of  Watervliet 
and  in  villages  in  the  upper  Hudson  valley. 

Distribution.  This  pest  has  now  attained  an  extensive  distri- 
bution in  this  country,  ranging  from  north  of  Salem,  Mass.,  to  Char- 


8  NEW    YORK    STATE    M,USEUM 

lotte,  N.  C,  and  westward  into  Ohio  and  Kentucky.  It  occurs 
in  most  of  the  cities  and  villages  in  the  Hudson  valley,  having 
made  its  way  north  to  Glens  Falls  arid  Ticonderoga  and  along 
the  Mohawk  valley  at  least  to  Amsterdam.  It  has  become  well 
established  at  Elmira  and  Ithaca  and  has  been  known  for  some 
years  in  Oswego,  though  it  does  not  appear  to  have  been  par- 
ticularly destructive  in  that  city.  There  is  no  record  known  to 
us  of  this  species  occurring  in  Utica,  Syracuse,  Rochester  or 
Buffalo,  though  it  is  rather  surprising  that  it  has  not  already 
become  established  in  all  of  these  cities. 

Description.  The  skeletonized  brown  appearance  of  the  fol- 
iage in  midsummer  is  very  characteristic  of  the  work  of  this 
pest,  particularly  in  the  eastern  cities  and  villages  of  the  State. 
The  irregular,  oval  holes  about  one-quarter  of  an  inch  in  diam- 
eter, eaten  by  the  beetles  in  early  spring,  are  another  indication 
of  the  work  of  this  species. 

The  parent  beetle  may  be  recognized  by  reference  to  the 
colored  illustration  [pi.  i,  fig.  5,6].  lit  is  about  one-quarter  of  an 
inch  long,  with  the  head,  thorax  and  margin  of  the  wing  covers 
a  reddish  yellow.  The  coal-black  eyes  and  median  spot  of  the 
same  color  on  the  head  are  prominent.  The  thorax  is  marked 
with  a  dorsal  black  spot  of  variable  shape  and  with  a  pair  of 
lateral  ovoid  ones.  The  median  black  line  on  the  wing  covers  is 
widely  separated  from  lateral  stripes  of  the  same  color  by  green: 
ish  yellow.  The  wing  covers  are  minutely  and  irregularly  punc- 
tured, bear  a  fine  pubescence  and  at  the  base  of  each  there  is  an 
elongated,  black  spot  in  the  middle  of  the  greenish  yellow  stripe. 
These  markings  are  fairly  constant  in  the  beetle,  though  the 
color  is  quite  variable  during  life  and  changes  more  or  less  after 
death.  Many  of  the  insects  emerging  from  winter  quarters  have 
the  yellowish  stripes  of  the  wing  covers  nearly  obliterated  by 
black. 

The  orange-yellow  eggs  [pi.  i,  fig.  i]  are  usually  deposited  in 
irregular  rows  side  by  side,  forming  clusters  of  from  three  to 
twenty-six  or  more  on  the  underside  of  the  leaf.  Each  egg  is 
somewhat  fusiform,  attached  vertically  by  its  larger  end  and 
with  the  free  extremity  tapering  to  a  paler  rounded  point. 

The  recently  hatched  grub  [pi.  I,  fig.  2]  is  about  one-twentieth 
of  an  inch  long  with  the  head,  thoracic  shield,  numerous  tuber- 
cles, hairs  and  le^s  jet-black.  The  skin  is  dark  yellow  but  the 
tubercles  are  so  large  and  the  hairs  so  prominent  that  the  pre- 
vailing color  of  the  grub  at  this  stage  is  nearly  black.  An  increase 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE   AND    WHITE-MARKED    TUSSOCK    MOTH  Q 

in  size,  following  molts,  is  accompanied  by  the  stiff  hairs  be- 
coming less  conspicuous  and  the  yellow  more  prominent,  till 
the  grub  becomes  full  grown  [pi.  I,  fig.  3].  It  is  then  about  one- 
half  of  an  inch  long,  more  flattened  than  in  the  earlier  stages, 
with  a  broad,  yellowish  stripe  down  the  middle  of  the  back  and 
with  a  narrower  stripe  of  the  same  color  on  each  side,  these  be- 
ing separated  by  broad,  dark  bands  thickly  set  with  tubercles 
bearing  short,  dark  colored  hairs.  The  dorsal  yellow  stripe  is 
broken  on  each  side  by  a  subdorsal  row  of  black  tubercles  which 
decrease  in  size  posteriorly.  The  lateral  yellow  stripe  includes 
a  row  of  prominent  tubercles  with  dark  tips  bearing  hairs  of  the 
same,  color.  The  under  surface  is  yellowish. 

The  pupa  [pi.  i,  fig.  4]  is  a  bright  orange-yellow,  about  one- 
fifth  of  an  inch  long  and  with  a  very  convex  dorsal  surface 
which  bears  transverse  rows  of  stout,  inconspicuous  hairs. 

Life  history.  The  transformations  of  this  insect  are  so  rapid 
and  so  greatly  influenced  by  local  conditions 'that  a  man  must 
know  what  to  expect  or  he  will  accomplish  very  little  in  fighting 
the  pest,  because  a  substance  effective  against  the  beetles  or  grubs 
may  not  kill  the  pupae  and,  after  the  larvae  have  begun  to  de- 
scend, may  be  of  no  value.  The  beetles  winter  in  attics,  sheds, 
belfries  and  other  shelters.  They  emerge  with  the  advent  of 
warm  weather  and  may  then  be  found  on  the  walks  during  the 
sunny  portion  of  the  day  or  at  the  windows  of  houses,  trying  to 
escape.  The  last  of  April  or  early  in  May,  with  the  appearance 
of  the  foliage,  the  beetles  fly  to  the  elms  and  eat  irregular  holes 
in  the  leaves.  Some  time  is  occupied  in  feeding  before  the 
deposition  of  eggs,  the  latter  may  continue  four  and  possibly 
five  or  six  weeks.  The  prolific  beetles  consume  a  large  amount 
of  foliage  during  this  time,  depositing  clusters  of  from  three  to 
twenty-six  or  more  eggs  every  day  or  two.  Over  half  the  total 
number  of  eggs  may  be  laid  at  the  height  of  the  season  within 
about  twelve  days;  in  1898,  from  June  I2th  to  23d.  A  female 
may  produce  over  six  hundred  eggs. 

The  young  grubs  appear  early  in  June  or  about  five  or  six 
days  after  the  eggs  have  been  deposited  later  in  the  season.  They 
feed  on  the  under  surface  of  the  leaf,  producing  the  familiar 
skeletonization  [pi.  i,  fig.  7]  which  is  caused  by  their  eating 
the  softer  underpart,  leaving  the  veins  and  the  upper  epidermis 
practically  untouched.  The  results  of  their  feeding  are  so 
marked  that  it  is  easy  to  detect  the  presence  of  the  grubs  by  the 


IO  NEW    YORK    STATE    MUSEUM 

semitransparent  patches  in  the  foliage.     These  latter  soon  dry 
and  turn  brown. 

There  are  two  and  occasionally  three  generations  of  this  de- 
structive insect  in  the  latitude  of  Albany,  the  number  depending 
to  a  considerable  extent  upon  the  availability  of  suitable  food. 
The  grubs  complete  their  growth  in  from  fifteen  to  twenty  days, 
descending  limbs  and  trunk  to  a  great  extent  in  search  of  some 
shelter  under  which  to  pupate.  Seven  days  are  spent  in  this 
latter  state  in  warm  July  weather,  while  in  September  it  is  ex- 
tended to  twelve  and  in  October  to  twenty-four  days.  The  grubs 
of  the  first  brood  usually  forsake  the  trees  in  Albany  by  the  last 
of  June  or  early  in  July,  and  beetles  belonging  to  the  second 
generation  may  begin  depositing  eggs  about  the  middle  of  July, 
and  from  then  to  late  in  autumn  it  is  generally  possible  to  find 
this  insect  in  all  stages  in  some  part  of  Albany.  The  beetles  of 
the  second  brood  are  naturally  attracted  to  fresh  foliage  and 
consequently  more  eggs  are  usually  deposited  on  trees  which 
have  been  defoliated  earlier  in  the  season  than  upon  others. 

Badly  infested  trees  are  therefore  very  likely  to  lose  two  crops 
of  leaves  in  a  season  and  may  possibly  have  their  third  seriously 
marred  by  this  pest.  The  second  brood  of  grubs  completes  its 
growth  about  the  middle  of  August,  beetles  appearing  the  latter 
part  of  the  month,  and  if  there  is  an  abundant  supply  of  fresh 
leaves,  a  third  generation  may  appear  in  considerable  numbers. 
This  last  brood  more  frequently  occurs  in  near-by  trees  which 
have  not  been  severely  injured  earlier  in  the  season. 

Natural  enemies.  This  leaf  feeder  is  subject  to  attack  by  a 
number  of  natural  enemies,  most  of  which,  however,  are  of  com- 
paratively little  importance  in  keeping  it  in  check.  The  common 
garden  toad  will  devour  many  beetles,  and  the  much  despised 
English  sparrow  also  feeds  upon  these  insects  to  some  extent. 
Several  predaceous  insects  prey  upon  this  pest  to  a  certain 
degree. 

Preventive  measures.  There  are  measures  of  considerable 
value  in  the  prevention  of  insect  depredations,  and  there  is  no 
reason  why  such  should  not  be  applied  to  the  shade  tree  problem. 
It  is  a  mistake  to  have  half  to  three-fourths  of  all  the  shade 
trees  in  a  city  or  village  one  species,  especially  if  mostly  on 
contiguous  streets.  This  is  true  of  many  localities  where 
the  elm  leaf  beetle  has  caused  very  serious  injury  during  the 
last  few  years.  The  American  elm  and  sugar  maple,  both 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE   AND    WHITE-MARKED   TUSSOCK    MOTH  II 

deservedly  favorites  for  shade  and  park  trees,  may  well  give 
way  in  part  at  least  to  other  desirable,  species,  such  as  the  Nor- 
way maple,  an  excellent  tree  in  many  ways  and  practically  free 
from  the  insect  pests  so  injurious  to  the  sugar  and  the  white  or 
silver  maple.  The  last  named  has  been  extensively  used  in 
many  localities,  and  though  brittle  and  liable  to  injury  by  wind 
and  ice,  usually  keeps  in  excellent  condition  for  a  number  of 
years.  The  red  maple  is  also  a  valuable  tree.  The  American 
basswood  or  linden,  the  horsechestnut,  the  European  plane  tree 
or  buttonwood,  the  American  ash  and  oaks,  especially  the  pin 
oak,  red  oak  and  scarlet  oak  should  be  set  more  freely.  The 
Ailanthus  (pistillate  trees)  and  the  Carolina  poplar,  though  pos- 
sessing serious  drawbacks,  are  desirable  under  certain  condi- 
tions. This  diversified  planting  would  admit  the  use  of  one 
species  on  a  street,  and  if  adjacent  streets  were  set  with  differ- 
ent varieties,  such  an  arrangement  would  go  far  toward  reduc- 
ing the  possibility  of  extended  outbreaks  by  injurious  insects  or 
fungous  diseases. 

The  proper  care  of  trees,  including  judicious  selection  so  as  to 
secure  the  best  adaptation  to  local  conditions,  is  an  important 
factor  in  forestalling  insect  ravages.  Trees  in  full  vigor  are 
better  able  to  sustain  injury  and  are  usually  less  troubled  by  in- 
sects than  those  in  a  debilitated  condition.  Certain  progressive 
communities  have  already  recognized  this  need  and  have  met  it 
in  a  more  or  less  satisfactory  manner.  The  city  of  Newark, 
N.  J.,  with  a  population  of  347,469,  expends  for  tree  work  (which 
latter  is  separate  from  park  work)  about  $27,000  a  year,  $6000 
of  this  being  for  pruning,  $6000  for  spraying  and  $15,000  for 
setting  out  new  trees,  maintenance  etc.  East  Orange,  N.  J., 
with  a  population  of  only  34,371,  expended  in  1909  over  $10,000 
through  its  shade  tree  commission,  $1200  of  this  being  a  special 
appropriation  for  spraying  elms.  The  city  of  Buffalo  has  re- 
cently placed  the  care  of  its  trees  in  the  hands  of  a  forester  and 
there  is  no  reason  why  other  communities  should  not  adopt 
equally  comprehensive  measures.  Spraying  alone  is  not  suffi- 
cient. There  should  be  wise  planting,  judicious  pruning  and 
liberal  fertilization  whenever  necessary. 

Remedial  measures.  The  secret  in  controlling  this  insect  lies 
in  understanding  thoroughly  its  life  history  and  appreciating 
the  vulnerable  points.  A  thorough  spraying  with  a  poison  early 
in  the  spring,  when  the  leaves  are  half  out  or  larger,  is  most 


12  NEW    YORK    STATE    MjUSEUM 

effective  in  preventing  breeding,  as  the  beetles  are  de-. 
stroyed  before  they  can  deposit  many  eggs.  Arsenate  of  lead  is 
by  far  the  best  poison  and  should  be  used  at  the  rate  of  four  pounds 
(15  per  cent  arsenic  oxid)  to  fifty  gallons  of  water.  Fortunately  the 
beetles  are  rather  local  in  habit  and  as  a  consequence  individual 
trees  or  groups  of  trees  may  be  protected  to  a  very  large  extent 
even  if  there  are  neglected  ones  in  the  near  vicinity.  The  local 
spread  of  this  pest  is  slow  and  this  should  be  taken  advantage 
of  to  the  greatest  possible  extent  by  keeping  the  insect  in  control 
wherever  it  occurs,  even  though  the  infestation  be  a  small  one 
and  the  present  injury  of  comparatively  little  importance.  It  is 
a  mistake  on  the  part  of  local  authorities  to  wait  till  this  enemy 
of  the  elms  has  become  well  established  and  destructive  before 
repressive  measures  are  undertaken. 

The  grubs  feed  almost  exclusively  on  the  under  surface  of 
the  leaf,  rarely  occurring  upon  its  upper  side.  The  first  injury 
is  usually  on  the  upper  more  tender  leaves,  hence  there  is  great 
need  of  spraying  the  tops  of  the  trees,  and  in  order  to  kill  the  de- 
structive grubs  it  is  essential  that  the  poison  be  thrown  on  the 
underside  of  the  foliage.  Spraying  with  an  arsenical  poison  for 
the  destruction  of  grubs  is  satisfactory  only  when  the  application 
is  early,  as  it  is  hardly  advisable  to  spray  for  this  insect  when  the 
grubs  are  nearly  full  grown,  since  they  are  liable  to  desert  the 
tree  even  when  slightly  underfed  and  complete  their  transforma- 
tions, rather  than  to  eat  distasteful  foliage. 

The  ideal  spray  for  this  pest  is  a  fine  mist  applied  to  the  under 
side  of  all  the  leaves.  It  is  impossible  to  throw  such  a  spray 
any  distance,  and  owing  to  the  great  height  of  most  elms,  such 
treatment  is  impractical.  A  moderately  coarse  spray  which  can 
be  thrown  25  to  40  feet  has  been  usually  employed  in  connection 
with  ladders  or  the  use  of  a  high  tower.  The  latter  is  practical 
only  where  the  streets  are  fairly  level.  The  recent  development 
in  the  use  of  a  solid  stream  and  pressures  of  between  200  and 
300  pounds  for  gipsy  moth  work  has  greatly  reduced  the  cost  of 
applications  in  woodlands,  and  the  system  is  now  being  applied 
to  shade  trees  with  a  corresponding  saving  in  time  and  expense. 
This  method  necessitates  the  use  of  more  poison,  there  is  in- 
creased dripping  and  the  throwing  of  the  spray  upon  the  foliage 
is  not  so  readily  controlled.  These  are  grave  though  not  insur- 
mountable objections,  and  for  the  present  we  are  inclined  to 
favor  a  moderately  coarse  spray  with  the  use  of  ladders  or  a 
tower  as  the  most  practical  method  of  spraying  shade  trees. 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE    AND    WHITE-MARKED    TUSSOCK    MOTH  13 

Communities  usually  fail  to  realize  that  in  the  elm  leaf  beetle 
we  are  dealing  with  an  insect  extremely  sensitive  to  poison 
and  one  which  will  feed  upon  sprayed  leaves  only  when  no  others 
are  available.  Its  senses  are  so  keen  that  it  can  detect  poison 
hardly  visible  with  a  powerful  hand  lens.  Under  such  conditions 
one  may  readily  see  how  easy  it  is  to  secure  indifferent  results. 
Spraying  trees  is  a  disagreeable,  hazardous  occupation,  and  in 
order  to  secure  the  best  returns,  it  is  necessary  to  make  the  com- 
pensation such  as  to  result  in  a  keen  competition  for  the  position 
of  nozzleman.  The  application  of  business  principles  would  justify 
larger  municipalities  placing  this  work  in  the  hands  of  one  who 
understood  at  least  the  rudiments  involved  (a  skilled  landscape 
gardener  or  forester  would  be  even  better)  and  giving  him  au- 
thority to  insist  upon  any  reasonable  standards  in  methods  and 
operation.  Such  a  person  could  reasonably  be  expected,  if  pro- 
vided with  sufficient  funds,  to  keep  the  foliage  of  elms  practically 
intact  throughout  the  season,  even  in  sections  where  the  elm 
leaf  beetle  was  excessively  abundant  or  upon  trees  adjacent  to 
those  badly  injured  by  the  pest.  Many  trees  were  badly  injured 
last  year  because  there  was  so  much  difficulty  in  securing  men 
who  would  do  thorough  work,  a  prime  essential  in  an  under- 
taking of  this  kind. 

The  effective  spraying  season  extends  from  early  to  middle 
May  till  nearly  the  latter  part  of  June,  a  total  of  approximately 
six  weeks.  Making  allowances  for  interruptions  by  rain,  we 
can  hardly  expect  more  than  thirty  full  working  days  during 
this  period.  A  power  spraying  outfit  of  the  usual  type  and 
provided  with  two  lines  of  hose  can  spray  thoroughly,  perhaps 
fifty  trees  a  day  or  a  maximum  of  1500  during  the  season  as 
restricted  above,  much  depending  upon  the  size  and  location  of  the 
trees  as  well  as  the  efficiency  of  the  men  in  charge. 

The  cost  of  thorough  spraying  is  not  excessive.  It  may  be  esti- 
mated at  about  50  cents  a  tree  or  only  10-20  cents  a  tree  if  all 
the  work  be  done  from  the  ground  with  a  high  power  outfit,  in 
each  case  making  no  allowance  for  the  cost  of  apparatus.  A 
power  spraying  outfit  adapted  to  shade  tree  work  can  hardly 
be  obtained  for  less  than  $275  to  $500,  and  in  case  of  the  high 
pressure  outfits,  may  easily  amount  to  more  than  double  the 
latter  sum.  There  should  be  plenty  of  power,  an  abundance  of 
hose  and  good  ladders  unless  it  is  planned  to  do  all  the  work 
from  the  ground.  This  work  can  be  done  with  a  powerful  hand 
pump  at  a  greater  cost  for  operation  though  the  initial  expense 


14  NEW    YORK    STATE    M,USEUM 

($30 — $50)  is  much  less.  It  is  extremely  desirable,  where  conditions 
permit,  for  a  community  to  provide  not  only  for  the  spraying  of  the 
"street  trees,  but  also  to  arrange  for  the  care  of  those  on  private 
grounds  at  a  nominal  cost. 

The  full-grown  larvae  crawl  down  the  trunks  in  great  num- 
bers and  the  golden  yellow  pupae  may  be  found  in  abundance  in 
crevices  in  the  bark  and  on  the  ground  about  the  tree.  A  good 
proportion  of  the  insects  can  be  forced  to  take  refuge  on  the 
ground  by  scraping  off  the  rough  bark,  thus  depriving  them  of 
shelters  upon  the  tree.  Large  numbers  can  then  be  killed  when 
assembled  about  the  base  of  the  tree  by  spraying  them  with  a 
contact  insecticide  such  as  kerosene  emulsion,  whale  oil  soap 
solution  or  even  by  pouring  boiling  water  on  them.  The 
grubs  should  be  destroyed  in  the  manner  indicated  every  five 
days  so  long  as  the  pests  are  seen  in  numbers,  in  order  to  secure 
the  best  results.  This  method  of  fighting  the  pest  is  advisable 
only  when  it  is  impossible  to  employ  the  more  satisfactory 
arsenical  sprays.  Bands  of  tar,  sticky  fly  paper,  cotton  batting, 
etc.,  while  they  do  no  harm,  can  not  be  considered  of  much  value 
in  keeping  the  elm  leaf  beetle  under  control.  The  relatively  few 
grubs  caught  on  a  sticky  band  are  but  a  drop  in  the  bucket  com- 
pared with  the  masses  which  complete  their  transformations 
either  above  or  below.  It  is  worse  than  useless  to  attempt  to 
control  this  or  any  other  insect  by  boring  a  hole  in  the  trunk  of 
a  tree  and  inserting  therein  compounds  of  any  nature.  The  tree 
is  weakened  and  unless  the  chemical  be  powerful  enough  to  kill 
it,  the  insects  are  not  affected. 

White-marked   tussock   moth. 

Hemerocampa  leucostigma  Abb.  &  Sm. 

This  insect,  preeminently  a  pest  on  city  and  village  trees, 
occasionally  proves  a  veritable  scourge  over  considerable  areas. 
Some  cities  appear  to  be  more  afflicted  in  this  way  than  others. 
The  summer  of  1906  was  marked  by  extensive  depredations  in 
a  number  of  cities  and  villages  throughout  the  State,  thus  dupli- 
cating the  experience  of  1898.  It  will  therefore  be  seen  that  seri- 
ous injuries  by  this  caterpillar  are  more  or  less  periodic.  This 
is  to  be  explained  by  the  fact  that  the  species  has  a  number  of 
natural  enemies  which  assist  materially  in  keeping  it  under  con- 
trol. The  destructive  outbreaks  are  examples  of  what  might 
occur  annually  were  there  no  parasites  to  check  the  work  of  this 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE    AND    WHITE-MARKED    TUSSOCK    MOTH  15 

voracious  leaf  feeder.  The  cause  of  this  native  species  thriving 
so  greatly  in  cities  and  villages  during  recent  years  is  explained 
by  the  abundance  of  the  English  sparrow.  This  bird  will  not 
eat  the  caterpillars  and  drives  away  many  of  the  native  forms 
which,  in  earlier  days,  were  of  great  service  in  devouring  these 
hairy  pests. 

Description.  The  full-grown  caterpillar  is  really  a  beautiful 
object.  It  has  a  coral-red  head,  a  pair  of  long,  black  plumes  just 
over  it,  a  single  one  at  the  opposite  extremity  of  the  body,  four 
delicate  yellowish  or  white,  brushlike  tufts  on  its  back  and  just 
behind  them,  separated  only  by  a  segment,  two  small  retractile 
red  elevations.  There  is  a  broad,  black  band  broken  only  by 
tubercles  and  tufts  along  the  back  and  bordered  by  yellowish 
stripes.  Each  side  is  dark  gray  except  for  the  yellowish  tuber- 
cles. The  breathing  tubes  or  spiracles  are  in  a  lateral  black 
line  and  below  this  the  caterpillar  is  yellow,  the  legs  usually  be- 
ing paler  [pi.  2,  fig.  4].  The  very  young  caterpillar  is  pale  yel- 
lowish or  whitish  with  long,  irregular  hairs.  It  increases  in 
size,  casts  its  skin  from  time  to  time  and  assumes  one  after 
another  the  characteristics  of  the  full-grown  larva. 

The  thin  cocoons  spun  in  the  crevices  of  the  bark  [pi.  2,  fig.  6] 
have  the  long  hairs  of  the  caterpillar  interwoven  and  within  this 
shelter  the  larva  transforms  to  a  yellowish  white  pupa  more  or 
less  shaded  with  dark  brown  or  black  [pi.  2,  fig.  7]. 

The  sexes  differ  strikingly  as  is  shown  on  plate  2,  figures  I 
and  2.  The  male  is  a  beautiful  moth  with  large  feathery  anten- 
nae, tufted  legs,  and  with  the  wings  and  body  delicately  marked 
with  several  shades  of  gray  or  grayish  white.  The  female,  on 
the  other  hand,  is  a  nearly  uniform  gray  with  simple  antennae 
and  but  rudimentary  wings. 

The  eggs,  usually  over  three  hundred,  are  deposited  on  the 
empty  cocoon,  under  a  conspicuous  white  mass  of  frothy  matter 
about  one-half  of  an  inch  in  diameter  [pi.  2,  fig.  3].  This  soon 
hardens  and  forms  a  very  effective  protection.  The  egg  masses 
[pi.  7,  8]  are  easily  removed  and  a  tree  thoroughly  cleared 
thereof  can  become  infested  again  only  by  caterpillars  crawling 
from  adjacent  trees  or  being  carried  thereto.  The  individual  egg 
is  nearly  spheric,  about  one-twenty-fifth  of  an  inch  in  diameter, 
white  or  yellowish  white  and  with  a  light  brown  spot  surrounded 
by  a  ring  of  the  same  color. 

Life  history  and  habits.  This  insect  winters  in  the  conspic- 
uous egg  masses  described  above,  the  young  appearing  about 


l6  NEW    YORK    STATE    MUSEUM 

the  latter  part  of  May  in  this  latitude.  They  feed  at  first  on  the 
more  tender  lower  epidermis  of  the  leaf  and  soon  devour  all  but 
the  principal  veins.  The  small  caterpillars  frequently  hang 
by  a  silken  thread  and  continued  jarring  may  cause  many 
to  drop  to  the  ground.  "Feeding  and  growth  occupy  a  month  or 
more,  pupation  occurring  the  latter  part  of  June  or  early  in  July. 
There  is  some  deviation  from  this,  as  a  few  individuals  spin  up 
early  and  some  caterpillars  linger  till  numerous  egg  clusters  indi- 
cate that  most  of  the  insects  have  completed  the  round  of  life. 
The  pupal  stage  occupies  from  ten  to  fifteen  days.  The  wingless 
female  appears  at  the  end  of  this  period,  crawls  on  her  co- 
coon and  shortly  deposits  eggs  as  described.  There  is  normally 
but  one  generation  annually  in  Albany  and  other  inland  cities, 
while  in  New  York  City  and  vicinity  and  in  Boston,  Mass.,  there 
are  two  broods  and  at  Washington,  D.  C.,  there  are  three  gen- 
erations each  year  as  stated  by  Doctor  Howard. 

The  young  caterpillars  drop  from  the  tree  readily,  suspend 
themselves  by  silken  threads  and  then  may  be  blown  or  carried 
considerable  distances.  The  full-grown  caterpillars  desert  the 
trees  and  wander  considerably.  This  is  particularly  true  of  the 
larger  ones  which  almost  invariably  produce  female  moths.  The 
cocoons  are  spun  very  generally  on  the  trunks  or  on  the  under- 
side of  the  larger  branches. 

Food  plants.  This  leaf  feeder  exhibits  a  marked  preference 
in  cities  for  the  linden  and  horse-chestnut,  while  it  feeds  readily 
on  elms  and  maples.  It  has  also  been  recorded  on  a  number  of 
other  trees. 

Natural  enemies.  This  species  has  a  number  of  natural  ene- 
mies. Its  comparative  rarity  in  the  country  shows  that  our 
native  birds  must  be  very  efficient  natural  checks  upon  this  in- 
sect. Mr  E.  H.  Forbush  states  that  forty-seven  species  of  native 
birds  feed  on  hairy  caterpillars,  most  of  which  would  probably 
take  this  leaf  feeder.  The  robin,  Baltimore  oriole  and  cuckoo 
are  among  the  more  valuable  in  this  respect. 

Parasitic  insects  are  also  very  efficient  checks.  This  species  is 
subject  to  attack  by  some  twenty-one  primary  parasites  and  these 
in  turn  may  become  the  prey  of  fourteen  hyperparasites. 

Remedies.  A  simple  and  very  satisfactory  method  of  con- 
trolling- this  insect  is  the  gathering  and  destroying  of  egg  masses. 
Several  cities  and  villages  in  New  York  State  have  employed 
children  in  this  work  by  offering  a  small  bounty  and  a  system  of 
prizes.  The  result  has  been  that  a  large  number  of  egg  masses 


ELM    LEAF    BEETLE    AND    WHITE-MARKED   '-fUSSpCj^MtrTH,  \      17 

were  secured  and  destroyed  at  a  comparatively  slight  cost.  The 
defect  in  this  method  is  that  it  is  more*  or  less  irregular  in  opera- 
tion and  is  usually  resorted  to  only  after  serious  injury  to  the 
trees  has  aroused  public  opinion.  There  is  no  doubt  as  to  the 
effectiveness  of  collecting  egg  masses  and  in  not  a  few  instances 
it  may  prove  the  cheapest  method  of  keeping  this  pest  in 
check.  It  would  seem  better  for  the  welfare  of  the  trees  to 
make  some  provision  for  the  systematic  collection  of  egg  masses 
from  year  to  year  from  all  the  trees,  even  though  the  cost  be  some- 
what greater. 

The  collection  of  egg  masses  should  be  supplemented,  if  un- 
cleaned  trees  are  in  the  vicinity,  by  banding  the  trunks  at  the 
time  the  caterpillars  begin  to  crawl,  with  some  material  which 
will  prevent  the  ascent  of  straggling  larvae.  A  very  simple 
method  is  to  take  a  band  of  cotton  batting  some  six  or  eight 
inches  wide,  wrap  it  around  the  tree,  tie  a  string  about  its  middle 
and  then  turn  the  upper  edge  down  over  the  string.  Tree  tangle- 
foot, a  preparation  made  by  the  same  company  that  manufac- 
tures tanglefoot  fly  paper,  has  been  used  very  extensively  on 
trees  about  Boston.  It  is  very  adhesive,  remains  sticky  for  a  con- 
siderable time  and  does  not  injure  the  bark  of  older  trees  at  least. 

The  tussock  moth  caterpillar  succumbs  readily  to  arsenical 
poisons  and  where  the  trees  are  infested  or  are  likely  to  be  at- 
tacked by  more  than  one  leaf  feeder,  as  is  true  in  the  Hudson 
valley,  spraying  is  perhaps  the  best  method  of  protecting  the 
trees.  One  of  the  best  poisons  for  this  purpose,  particularly  in 
sections  infested  by  the  elm  leaf  beetle,  is  arsenate  of  lead,  (15 
per  cent  arsenic  oxid),  used  at  the  rate  of  four  pounds  to  fifty  gal- 
lons of  water. 


EXPLANATION  OF  PLATES 
Plate  i 

Executed  from  nature,  under  the  author's  direction,  by  L.  H. 
Joutel  of  New  York  City,  and  reproduced  from  the  5th  report  of 
the  Commissioners  of  Fisheries,  Game  and  Forests  through  the 
courtesy  of  the  commissioners 

19 


Elm  leaf  beetle 

Galerucella  luteola  Miill. 

1  Cluster  of  eggs,  much  enlarged 

i a  Side  view  of  single  egg,  still  more  enlarged 

2  Recently  hatched  larva  or  grub,  much  enlarged 

3  Full-grown  larva  or  grub,  much  enlarged 

4  Pupa,  much  enlarged 

5  Overwintered  beetle,  much  enlarged 

6  Fresh,  brightly  colored  beetle  much  enlarged 

7  Leaf  showing  eating  of  larvae  or  grubs  and  a  few  holes  eaten 

by  beetles,  eggs  in  clusters,  cast  larval  skins  and  full-grown 
larvae,  natural  size 

8  Leaf  skeletonized  by  grubs 

9  Leaf  eaten  by  beetles 

20 


PLATE  1 


"' 


L.  H.  joutei,  1900,  ELM   LEAF  BEETLE 

(Reprint  from  5th  report  of  commissioners  of  fisheries,  game  and  forests) 


Plate  2 

Executed  from  nature  by  L.  H.  Joutel 
21 


White-marked  tussock  moth 
Hemerocampa  leucostigma  Abb.  &  Sm. 

1  Male  moth  at  rest  on  trunk 

2  Female  laying  eggs  upon  her  cocoon 

3  Egg  masses  on  cocoons 

4  A  full-grown  caterpillar  resting  on  a  twig 

5  Cast  skins  of  caterpillars 

6  Cocoons  massed  on  trunk 

7  Pupa  of  female  within  cocoon 

8  Twigs  girdled  by  caterpillars 

8a  Twig  broken  off  at  point  of  girdling 

The  foliage  shows  the  effects  of  this  caterpillar's  work 

22 


PLATE  2 


L.  H.  Joutel,    1906. 


WHITE  MARKED  TUSSOCK  MOTH 


Plate  3 

23 


A  magnificent  English  elm  nearly  defoliated  by  the  elm  leaf 
beetle,  Galerucella  luteola  Miill.  Lancaster  street, 
Albany.  Photo  August  1906. 


Plate 


Albany,  Aug.  1906 

Work  of  elm  leaf  beetle  on  Lancaster  street 


Plate  4 
25 


Row  of  English  elms  on  South  Hawk  street,  Albany,  nearly 
ruined  by  the  work  of  the  elm  leaf  beetle,  Galerucella 
luteola  Mull.  Photo  August  1906.  These  nine  trees  were, 
in  1898,  in  about  the  same  condition  as  the  one  illustrated  on 
plate  3. 

26 


Plate  4* 


Albany,  Aug.  i  > 


Work  of  elm  leaf  beetle  on  South  Hawk  street 


;-•»••, 

f  %•  ':  .  •: 


Plate  5 

27 


American  elm  on  Washington  avenue  near  Fort  Orange  Club, 
Albany,  seriously  injured  by  the  elm  leaf  beetle,  Galerucella 
luteola  Mull.  Photo  August  1906.  Note  the  numerous  dead 
limbs.  This  tree  died  about  two  years  later. 

28 


Albany,  Aug.  1906 

Work  of  elm  leaf  beetle  on  Washington  avenue 


Plate  6 

29 


Work  of  white-marked  tussock  moth,  H  e  m  e  r  o  c  a  m  p  a 
leucostigma  Abb.  &  Sm.,  on  clump  of  horse-chestnuts 
standing  on  the  grounds  of  St  Francis  de  Sales  Asylum,  Albany. 
Photo  August  1906. 


Plate  7 


Egg  masses  of  white-marked  tussock  moth  H  e  m  e  r  o  - 
campa  leucostigma  Abb.  &  Sm.,  on  American  elm. 
Congress  street,  Albany.  Photo  August  1906.  Note  that  the  egg 
masses  are  conspicuous,  attached  to  slight  cocoons  and  therefore 
easily  removed. 

32 


Plate  7  V  AL.:  :'  vK'A  :/•'• 


Albany,  Aug.  1906 
White-marked  tussock  moth  eggs  on  Spring  street 


Plate  8 

33 


Egg  masses  of  white-marked  tussock  moth,  H  e  m  e  r  o  - 
cam  pa  leucostigma  Abb.  &  Sm.,  on  English  elm, 
Capitol  park,  Albany.  Photo  August  1906.  Note  that  the  egg 
masses  are  conspicuous,  attached  to  slight  cocoons  and  therefore 
easily  removed. 

34 


Plate  8   '• 


Capitol  Park,  Albany,  1906 

White-marked  tussock  moth  eggs 


INDEX 


Arsenate  of  lead,  9,  12,  17. 

Birds,  feeding  on  white-marked 
tussock  moth,  16;  on  elm  leaf 
beetle,  10. 

Cotton  batting,  14. 

Elm  leaf  beetle,  6-14;  description,  8- 
9 ;  distribution,  7-8 ;  food  plants,  7 ; 
life  history,  9-10;  natural  enemies, 
10 ;  remedial  measures,  11-14. 

Fly  paper,  14. 

Galerucella  luteola,  6-14. 

Hemerocampa    leucostigma,  14-17. 

Kerosene  emulsion,  14. 

leucostigma,    Hemerocampa,    14-17. 
luteola,   Galerucella,  6-14. 


Parasites,  white-marked  tussock 
moth,  16. 

Remedies,  arsenate  of  lead,  12,  17; 
cotton  batting,  14;  flv  paper,  14; 
kerosene  emulsion,  14;  tar  bands, 
14;  whale  oil  soap  solution,  14. 

Tar  bands,  14. 

Tussock  moth,  see  White-marked 
tussock  moth. 

Whale  oil  soap  solution,  14. 

White-marked  tussock  moth,  14- 
17;  description,  15;  food  plants, 
16;  life  history  and  habits,  15-16; 
natural  enemies,  16;  remedies,  16- 


35 


AN    INITIAL    ™jTof ;uRfToCRENTRS 

S£  BB0E0AKS0NSTHE  S^™..-      «.  -HM.TV 
WILL  INCREASE  TO  SO 
DAY     AND    TO     $I.OO     ON 


LD  21- 


•"ll«liMmLIBRARIES 
CDSbDbfiblS 


333209 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY