Skip to main content

Full text of "Entomological news"

See other formats


USISSN  0013-872X 
JANUARY  &  FEBRUARY  2003  No.  1 

TOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


W. 

£83 


j  Murray- Aaron:  Forgotten  First  Editor  of  Entomological  News 

Kirland  A .  Kenney,  Christine  G.  Galvagna,  and  Jorge  A .  Santiago-Blay 

ery  of  the  milliped  Plenroloma  flavipes  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae) 
exas,  and  other  records  from  west  of  the  Mississippi  River 

Rowland  M.  Shelley,  Chris  T.  McAllister,  and  Shelly  B.  Smith 
Possible  reproduction  of  the  Comal  Springs  Riffle  Beetle,  Heterelmis 

comalensis  (Coleoptera:  Elmidae),  in  captivity  Joe  N.  Fries 

A  new  species  of  Pteroptrix  (Hymenoptera:  Aphelinidae)  from  Argentina, 
the  first  known  aphelinid  with  three-segmented  tarsi 

Jung-Wook  Kim  and  Serguei  V.  Triapitsyn 

A  new  species  of  Leptoglossits  (Heteroptera:  Coreidae:  Anisoscelini)  associated 
with  the  Amazonian  palm  Mauritia  flexuosa  (Arecaceae:  Lepidicaryeae) 
in  Peru  Harry  Brailovsky  and  Guy  Couturier 

Winter  aggregation  of  Harmonia  axyridis  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae)  in  a 
concrete  observation  tower  Paul  W.  Schaefer 

Review  of  the  Middle  American  Lace  Bug  genus  Macrotingis  (Heteroptera: 
Tingidae),  with  a  key  and  a  new  species  from  Mexico  Richard  C.  froeschner 

A  new  Nearctic  Paracloeodes  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae) 

W.  P.  McCafferty  and  David  R.  Lenat 

Ableptemetes:  A  new  genus  of  Tricorythodinae  (Ephemeroptera:  Leptohyphidae) 
from  Mexico  and  Central  America         N.A.  Wiersema  and  W.  P.  McCafferty 

A  new  species  of  the  genus  Tomocerus  (Tomocerina)  from  China 
(Collembola:  Tomoceridae)  with  a  discussion  of  the  subgenera  of 
Tomocerus  Yi-Tong  Ma,  Jian-Xiu  Chen,  and  Kenneth  Christiansen 

A  new  record  of  Tomocerus  baicalensis  from  China  with  its  redescription 
(Collembola:  Tomoceridae) 

Yi-Tong  Ma,  Jian-Xiu  Chen,  and  Kenneth  Christiansen 

Notes  on  the  distribution  of  Leuctra  carolinensis  and  L.  variabilis 

(Plecoptera:  Leuctridae)  in  Maryland,  with  amended  and  new  state  records 

Scott  A.  Grubbs 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

The  bee  genus  Mydrosoma  in  Costa  Rica  (Hymenoptera:  Colletidae) 

Charles  D.  Michener 

Acerpenna  sulfurosus,  comb.  n.  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae)        N.A.  Wiersema 

A  replacement  name  for  Stagetus  convexus  White  (Coleoptera:  Anohiidae) 

Gianluca  Nardi 

Otocryptops  gracilis  Berkeleyensis  Verhoef,  1938,  A  synonym  of  Scolopocryptops 
gracilis  Wood,  1862  (Chilopoda:  Scolopendromorpha:  Scolopocryptopidae) 

Rowland  M.  Shellev 


10 

18 
23 
29 
33 

37 

41 

47 
51 

54 
55 

56 

57 


BOOK  REVIEWS: 

Mites  of  Greenhouses,  Identification,  Biology  and  Control  by 

Zhi-Qiang  Zhang  Marjorie  A .  Ho y      58 

A  Color  Handbook  of  Biological  Control  in  Plant  Protection 

by  Beil  Helyer,  Kevin  Brown,  and  Nigel  I).  Cattlin  Joanne  \\halcn      59 

Insects  Revealed:  Monsters  or  Marvels?  by  Jacques  de  Tonnancour 

Lester  H.  Guthrie  and  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay      60 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 


MAILED  ON  APRIL  9,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1.0 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomologi- 
cal Society  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway.  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195.  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  email  aes@acnatsci.org;  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci  .org/hosted/aes . 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  Members  of  the  Society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the 
USA  and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues,  when  available, 
are  sold  by  complete  volume  for  US  $15  to  Members  and  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  or  email  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  Editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890- 
1920  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-1961);  1945-1967  R.G. 
Schmieder  (1898-1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974- 
2002  Howard  P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News:  Version  1.0. 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author  although  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all 
prospective  authors  join  the  society. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  Editor:  Address. 

All  manuscripts,  including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomol- 
ogical News  as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A. 
Santiago-Blay  at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  Distrist  of  Columbia  20013-7012 
U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.O.  Box,  please  use 
this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other 
means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  phone  (202)  786-2876,  Fax  (202)  786-2832,  web  page 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.htm,  e-mails  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu  or 
blayj@hotmail.com.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  Editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them 
to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to:  first,  not  submit  in 
parallel  the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal,  and  second,  assign  the  copyright  to  the  publishers  of 
Entomological  News  (such  assignment  taking  effect  as  soon  as  the  author  receives  written  confirma- 
tion of  acceptance  of  the  manuscript).  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  original  art- 
work and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  type  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for 
the  Acknowledgments  and  the  Literature  Cited. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 
Faith  Kuehn,  3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania,  PA  19061   U.S.A. 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 ,  January  &  February  2003 


EUGENE  MURRAY-AARON  (1852-1940): 
FORGOTTEN  FIRST  EDITOR  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS1 

Kirkland  A.  Kenney,2  Christine  G.  Galvagna,'  and  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Slav 4 

When  author  JASB  took  on  the  editorialship  of  Entomological  News  (November 
2003),  he  decided  to  learn  about  the  early  history  of  the  journal.  Until  recently,  Henry 
Skinner,  Editor  from  1890  to  1920,  was  cited  as  the  first  Editor  of  Entomological 
News.  However,  upon  opening  the  first  issue  of  the  journal,  we  noticed  that  Eugene 
Murray- Aaron,  herein  abbreviated  EM  A,  got  the  first  two  issues  (January  and  Febru- 
ary 1890)  off  the  ground  when  this  journal  was  known  as  "Entomological  News  and 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Section,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadel- 
phia." In  addition  to  entomology,  EMA  had  diverse  professional  interests  including 
natural  history,  geography,  cartography,  travel,  human  biology,  cycling,  government, 
etc.  Murray- Aaron's  literary  fiction  and  scientific  journalism  writings  are  direct  and 
captivating,  often  reflecting  strong  views.  What  follows  is  an  abstract  on  the  life  of 
EMA  taken  from  a  much  larger  manuscript  in  preparation. 

Eugene  Murray-Aaron  was  born  in  Norristown,  a  small  city  located  northeast  of 
Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania  (United  States),  on  August  4,  1852.  Reverend  Samuel 
Aaron,  an  ardent  advocate  of  temperance,  antislavery,  and  scholarship  in  southeast- 
ern Pennsylvania  and  eastern  central  New  Jersey  during  the  middle  third  of  the  19th 
century,  was  his  step-grandfather.  EMA  served  as  the  last  Editor  of  Papilio  (1884). 
Murray- Aaron's  passion  in  entomology  focused  on  skippers  (Hesperiidae),  an  inter- 
est shared  with  his  editorial  successor  of  greater  fame,  Henry  Skinner,  with  whom  he 
co-authored  only  one  paper  (1889  Canadian  Entomologist  21:126-131,  145-149). 
During  the  1880s  and  early  1890s,  EMA  traveled  extensively  throughout  the  Carib- 
bean, Central,  and  South  America.  His  major  natural  history  books,  entitled  Butterfly 
Hunters  in  the  Caribbees  (1884)  and  The  New  Jamaica  (with  E.  M.  Bacon.  1890) 
were  undoubtedly  conceived  there.  While  the  reasons  for  his  brief  tenure  as  Editor  of 
Entomological  News  are  not  completely  clear,  there  seems  to  have  been  differences 
of  opinion  between  EMA,  Skinner,  and  Philip  Powell  Calvert  (third  Editor  of 
Entomological  News)  on  the  best  use  of  the  printed  space  in  Entomological  News. 
During  1893  and  1894,  EMA  was  columnist  for  the  Sunday  science  section  of  The 
Los  Angeles  Times  and  other  major  newspapers  in  the  USA.  Murray- Aaron  served  as 
geographic  editor  for  the  George  F.  Cram  Company  from  1899  to  1917.  While  EMA 
did  not  return  to  the  scholarly  study  of  insects,  his  love  for  entomology  remained  with 
him  until  his  later  years.  At  82,  EMA  was  reported  gardening  in  Chicago  (Illinois) 
and  living  with  assistance  from  the  government  as  his  investments  had  become 
worthless.  Eugene  Murray- Aaron  died  on  September  19,  1940. 


'  Received  on  March  15.  2004.  Accepted  on  March  16,  2004. 

2  Benington  College,  Bennington,  Vermont  05201 .  U.S.A.  E-mail:  grntbuggh  («  aol.com. 

'  Bennington  College,  Bennington.  Vermont  05201 ,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  christinegalvai:na«<  liotmail.com. 

4  Department  ol"  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  ol  Natural  History,  P.O.  Box  37012,  Wash- 
ington, DC  20013-7012,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  santiago-blayC"  nmnh.si.edu. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NLWS  114(1):  I .  January  &  February  2003 
Mailed  on  April  4.  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


DISCOVERY  OF  THE  MILLIPED 

PLEUROLOMA  FLAVIPES  (POLYDESMIDA: 

XYSTODESMIDAE)  IN  TEXAS,  AND  OTHER  RECORDS 

FROM  WEST  OF  THE  MISSISSIPPI  RIVER1 

Rowland  M.  Shelley,2  Chris  T.  McAllister,'  and  Shelly  B.  Smith' 

ABSTRACT:  Pleuroloma  flavipes  Rafinesque,  the  westernmost  representative  of  the  east-Nearctic 
xystodesmid  milliped  fauna,  is  reported  from  Bowie  County,  Texas,  the  first  record  from  this  state. 
Other  new  localities  from  west  of  the  Mississippi  River  are  listed,  one  being  a  disjunct  site  in 
Lafayette  Parish,  Louisiana,  approximately  200  mi  (320  km)  south  of  the  contiguous  range;  it  is 
believed  to  represent  an  allopatric  population.  These  sites  extend  the  distributions  of  the  species, 
genus,  tribe  Rhysodesmini,  and  family  some  75  mi  ( 120  km)  westward  in  Oklahoma;  the  published 
locality  in  Ellsworth  County,  Kansas,  is  the  westernmost  in  the  Central  Plains  for  these  taxa. 

KEY  WORDS:  Pleuroloma  flavipes,  Polydesmida,  Xysdodesmidae,  Mississippi  River,  Texas,  Okla- 
homa, Louisiana. 

The  milliped  family  Xystodesmidae  occupies  three  areas  of  North  America  in 
addition  to  those  in  east  Asia  and  the  Mediterranean  region  of  Europe,  Africa, 
and  the  Middle  East  (Hoffman  1978,  Fig.  2;  Shelley  1987,  Fig.  1):  the  eastern 
United  States  and  southern  Ontario  and  Quebec,  Canada,  from  the  Central  Plains 
eastward;  the  southern  periphery  of  Texas  to  El  Salvador;  and  along  the  Pacific 
Coast  from  southern  Alaska  to  Los  Angeles,  extending  eastward  into  western 
Montana.  Two  species  occur  outside  these  areas  in  the  United  States:  Stenodes- 
mus  tuobitus  (Chamberlin),  in  southern  New  Mexico  and  Culberson  County, 
Texas,  and  Rhysodesmus  chisosi  Shelley,  in  Brewster  County,  Texas  (Shelley 
1987,  1989,  1992).  The  species  with  the  greatest  distribution  in  the  family  is 
Pleuroloma  flavipes  Rafinesque,  which  is  the  westernmost  representative  of  the 
east-Nearctic  fauna  from  the  Oklahoma/Texas  border  northward.  Including  the 
records  herein,  its  contiguous  range  encompasses  some  985  mi  (1,576  km), 
north/south,  in  the  west,  584  mi  (934  km)  in  the  east,  and  1 ,130  mi  ( 1 ,808  km), 
east/west.  The  northernmost  localities  are  in  Cass  County,  North  Dakota,  Ingham 
County,  Michigan,  Essex  County,  Ontario,  and  Franklin  County,  Massachusetts; 
the  southernmost  are  in  Cleveland  County,  North  Carolina,  and  Madison  Parish, 
Louisiana;  and  the  easternmost  are  from  Franklin  County,  Massachusetts,  and  the 
western  shore  of  Chesapeake  Bay,  Virginia  (Shelley  1980,  1988;  Hoffman  1999). 
Shelley  (1980,  1990)  predicted  eventual  discovery  in  northeastern  Texas  and 
shaded  this  corner  of  the  state  in  his  distribution  map  (1980,  Fig.  29),  and  this 
prediction  can  now  be  confirmed,  as  the  third  author  collected  individuals  of  both 
sexes  near  Beaver  Dams  Community,  Bowie  County,  in  April  2002.  They  are  de- 
posited in  the  invertebrate  collection  of  the  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of 
Natural  Sciences. 


1  Received  on  June  6,  2002;  Accepted  on  November  23,  2003 

2  Research  Lab.,  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  430 1  Reedy  Creek  Rd.,  Raleigh, 
NC  27607,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley@ncmail.net. 

'Biology  Department,  Texas  A&M  University-Texarkana,  Texarkana,  TX  75505,  U.S.A.;  CTM, 
E-mail:  chris.mcallister@tamut.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


Pleuroloma  flavipes  was  described  and  fully  illustrated  by  Shelley  (1980),  as 
part  of  a  generic  revision;  the  characteristic  configuration  of  the  gonopods,  the 
male  copulatory  appendages,  is  shown  in  Fig.  1 1 .  It  is  a  component  of  the  tribe 
Rhysodesmini,  otherwise  represented  in  Texas  by  Rhysodesmus  texicolem 
(Chamberlin),  in  the  Rio  Grande  Valley  (Cameron,  Hidalgo,  Starr,  Webb,  and 
Willacy  counties);  R.  chisosi,  in  the  Chisos  Mountains,  Big  Bend  National  Park; 
and  S.  tuobitus,  in  McKittrick  Canyon.  Guadalupe  Mountains  National  Park 
(Hoffman  1970;  Shelley  1987,  1989).  Shelley  (1990)  reported  5.  tuobitus  from 
Hidalgo  County,  around  984  mi  ( 1 ,574  km)  southeast  of  McKittrick  Canyon,  but 
this  locality  is  implausible  and  is  herewith  deleted  pending  confirmation  with 
fresh  material.  As  in  all  rhysodesminines,  the  somatic  features  of  P.  flavipes  are 
highly  variable,  while  the  gonopods  are  relatively  constant.  It  is  one  of  the  few 
xystodesmids  north  of  the  Rio  Grande  that  can  be  reliably  identified  from  fe- 
males as  well  as  males  because  of  the  diagnostic  lobes  on  the  caudal  margins  of 
the  sterna,  which  are  apically  broad  in  the  Bowie  County  specimens,  in  contrast 
to  the  subtriangular  lobes  in  the  North  Carolina  individual  illustrated  by  Shelley 
(1980,  Fig.  6).  The  species  exhibits  three  color  patterns  -  bimaculate,  trimaculate, 
and  banded  -  and  the  Texas  specimens  are  bimaculate  with  a  black  dorsal  base 
color  and  yellow  paranota. 

New  localities  for  P.  flavipes  from  west  of  the  Mississippi  River  expand  the 
distributions  of  the  species,  genus,  tribe,  and  family  westward  by  around  75  mi 
(120  km)  in  Oklahoma  (Fig.  1).  The  range  west  of  the  Mississippi  is  shown  in 
the  accompanying  map;  the  westernmost  localities  are  in  Noble  County,  Okla- 
homa (cited  herein),  Ellsworth  County,  Kansas  (Shelley  1980),  and  Cuming  and 
Lincoln  counties,  Nebraska  (Kenyon  1893),  with  that  in  Kansas,  located  near  the 
center  of  the  state,  forming  the  western  limits  for  the  species,  genus,  tribe,  and 
family.  No  records  are  available  from  South  Dakota,  but  P.  flavipes  surely  occurs 
in  the  eastern  periphery,  along  the  Missouri,  Big  Sioux,  and  Minnesota  Rivers. 
The  new  locality  in  Louisiana  is  detached  from  the  contiguous  area  by  around 
200  mi  (320  km).  While  P.  flavipes  may  yet  be  discovered  in  intervening  parish- 
es, much  of  this  area,  particularly  the  Kisatchie  National  Forest  in  Grant,  Natch- 
itoches,  Rapides,  and  Winn  parishes,  has  been  well  collected  without  the  discov- 
ery of  a  single  individual.  Consequently,  we  believe  that  an  allopatric  population 
exists  in  southern  Louisiana.  Published  records  from  west  of  the  Mississippi 
River  are  cited  by  Shelley  (1980),  and  new  ones  are  listed  below.  Acronyms  of 
repositories  are  as  follows: 

EIL  -  Zoology  Department,  Eastern  Illinois  University.  Charleston. 

FMNH  -  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chicago,  Illinois. 

FSCA-  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Gainesville. 

ISU  -  Entomology  Department,  Iowa  State  University,  Ames. 

MCZ  --  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology.  Harvard  University,  Cambridge, 

Massachusetts. 
NCSM  -  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  Raleigh. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NDSU  -  Entomology  Department,  North  Dakota  State  University,  Fargo. 

NMNH  -  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Wash- 
ington, DC. 

OKSU  -  Emerson  Entomological  Museum,  Oklahoma  State  University,  Still- 
water. 

OMNH  -  Sam  Noble  Oklahoma  Museum  of  Natural  History,  University  of  Ok- 
lahoma, Norman. 

PMNH  -  Peabody  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Yale  University,  New  Haven, 
Connecticut. 

TBMNH  -  Thomas  Burke  Museum  of  Natural  History,  University  of  Washing- 
ton, Seattle. 

UAAM  -  University  of  Arkansas  Arthropod  Museum,  Fayetteville. 

UCD  -  Bohart  Entomological  Museum,  University  of  California  at  Davis. 

UCO  -  Biology  Department,  University  of  Central  Oklahoma,  Edmond. 

UMN  -  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Minnesota,  St.  Paul. 

UMO  -  Enns  Entomological  Museum,  University  of  Missouri,  Columbia. 

VMNH  -  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Martinsville. 

WTAMU  -  Department  of  Life,  Earth,  and  Environmental  Sciences,  West  Texas 
A&M  University,  Canyon. 

NEW  RECORDS 

ARKANSAS:  Jackson  Co.,  Newport,  Cfcf ,  99,  2  April  1961 ,  D.  Combs  (FSCA).  Phillips  Co., 
St.  Francis  Nat.  For.,  Storm  Creek  Lake  Area,  4Cf ,  69-  16  June  1999,  R.  M.  Shelley  (FMNH,  NCSM). 
Sebastian  Co.,  Ft.  Smith  landfill,  4Cf  but  huge  numbers  in  forest/pasture  ecotone,  16  June  1994,  C. 
E.Carlton  (UAAM). 

IOWA:  Boone  Co..  Ledges  St.  Pk..  Cf,  9,  4  June  1984,  R.  E.  Lewis  (NCSM).  Delaware  Co., 
Delhi,  2cf ,  9-  date  and  collector  unknown  (PMNH).  Dickinson  Co.,  Cayler  Prairie,  Cfcf .  99-  date 
and  collector  unknown  (ISU).  Hancock  Co..  Pilot  Knob  For..  6Cf .  59-  H.  W.  Levi  (MCZ).  Henry  Co., 
Mt.  Pleasant,  2Cf ,  date  and  collector  unknown  (NMNH).  Pocahontas  Co.,  Kaslow  Prairie.  Cfcf ,  99 
15  June  1966,  K.  L.  Bean  (ISU).  Story  Co.,  Ames,  9,  1941,  collector  unknown  (NMNH). 

KANSAS:  Johnson  Co..  Bonner  Springs,  Cf,  10  October  1973.  W.  S.  Graig  (UMO).  County 
Unknown.  Tall  Oaks,  Cf,  12  June  1964,  H.  S.  Dybas  (FMNH). 

LOUISIANA:  Lafayette  Co.,  Lafayette,  on  ground  at  night,  C?,  22  August  1996,  L.  A.  Baptiste 
(UCD). 

MINNESOTA:  Anoka  Co.,  Coon  Creek,  Cf ,  19  September  1933,  A.  C.  Hodson  (UMN).  Becker 
Co.,  Pickerel  Lake,  2Cf ,  9-  3  September  1975,  A.  Friskop  (NDSU).  Houston  Co..  Mississippi  River 
bluff,  29,  30  May  1941 ,  Wing  (UMN);  Mississippi  River  bluff  N  of  New  Albin  Iowa.  C?,  9,  23  May 
1954, C.  E.  Mickel  (UMN);  and  3  mi  (4.8  km)  NE  Eitzen,  along  Winnebago  Cr.,  tf,  9, 23  May  1954, 
collector  unknown  (UMN).  Martin  Co..  Fairmont,  in  cornfield,  Cf,  39-  juvs.,  7  July  1942.  20  June 
1944,  G.B.Simpson  (UMN).  Nobles  Co. ,  Worthington,  3Cf,  59,  1  July  1941 ,  C.  E.  Slower  (UMN). 
Wabasha  Co..  W  of  Lake  Pepin,  2Cf ,  99-  4  July  '907,  collector  unknown  (TBMNH).  Washington 
Co.,  Scandia,  Second  Lake,  C?,  8  July  1958,  L.  V.  Knutson  (VMNH) 

MISSOURI:  Bollinger  Co.,  Glenallen,  9-  date  unknown.  A.  Henderson  (UMO).  Camdcn  Co., 
Camdenton,  2tf,  15  May  1953,  G.  T.  Riegel  (EIL).  Clay  Co.,  Coolie  Lake,  Cf,  30  May  1958,  J.  R. 
Heitzman  (FSCA).  Penis  Co.,  9  mi  (14.4  km)  S  Sedalia,  Friendly  Prairie,  C/1,  9  June  1978,  collector 
unknown  (UMO).  Stone  Co.,  N  of  Kimberly  City,  Table  Rock  Lake,  Cf ,  25  May  1974.  S.  E.  Thewke 
(UMO). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


Fig.  1.  Distribution  of  Pleuroloma  flavipes  west  of  the  Mississippi  River. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NEBRASKA:  Douglas  Co.,  Waterloo  (misspelled  as  "Wameloo"),  9-  26  February  1949,  collec- 
tor unknown  (NMNH).  Sarpv  Co.,  Bellevue,  Fontanelle  Forest  Nature  Center,  Cf,  22  June  1986, 
Dietz  &  Benedict  (NCSM). 

OKLAHOMA:  Cherokee  Co.,  Greenleaf  St.  Pk.,  99,  juvs.,  date  unknown,  J.  Brooks  (UCO). 
Larimer  Co.,  locality  not  specified,  O\  9- 9  June  1931.R.  D.  Bird  (OMNH).Mm>5  Co.,  Locust  Grove, 
Cf,  29,  20  May  1972.  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU).  Mclntosh  Co.,  Eufala,  by  lake,  Cf,  June  1994,  W.  D. 
Sissom  (WTAMU).  Noble  Co.,  Perry,  9, 6  June  1965,  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU)  Westernmost  Oklahoma 
Record.  Nowata  Co.,  Lenapah.  Cf ,  9,  19  May  1965,  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU).  Payne  Co.,  Stillwater,  on 
golf  course  greens,  cfcf ,  99-  26  June  1962,  D.  E.  Howell  (OKSU);  and  Ripley.  Ghost  Hollow,  9,  date 
unknown,  McKenna  (OKSU).  Pittsburgh  Co.,  McAlester,  Cf ,  28  June  1972,  J.  Sallee  (OKSU).  Rogers 
Co.,  Foyil,  Cf.  3  June  197 1 .  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU).  Sequoyah  Co.,  Gore,  Cf ,  20  April  1952,  A.  C.  Cohen 
(SMUO).  Wagoner  Co.,  3  mi  (4.8  km)  S  Porter,  Cf,  25  May  1977,  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU). 

TEXAS:  Bowie  Co.,  ca.  9.5  mi  (15.2  km)  NNW  DeKalb,  along  US  Hwy.  259  at  Beaver  Dams 
Community.Cf,  29,  20  and  27  April  2002,  S.  B.  Smith  (NCSM).  New  State  Record. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  the  following  professors,  curators,  and  collection  managers  for  loaning  specimens,  or 
providing  access  to  the  same,  to  the  first  author:  R.  C.  Funk  (EIL),  D.  Summers  (FMNH),  G.  B. 
Edwards  (FSCA),  R.  E.  Lewis  (ISU),  H.  W.  Levi  (MCZ),  E.  U.  Balsbaugh  (NDSU).  J.  Coddington 
(NMNH),  D.  C.  Arnold  (OKSU).  H.  P.  Brown  (OMNH).  R.  J.  Pupedis  (PMNH),  R.  Crawford 
(TBMNH).  J.  K.  Barnes  (UAAM),  L.  S.  Kimsey  (UCD),  D.  Blass  (UCO),  P.  J.  Clausen  (UMN),  R. 
W.  Sites  (UMO),  R.  L.  Hoffman  (VMNH),  and  W.  D.  Sissom  (WTAMU).  The  first  author  collected 
specimens  in  Phillips  County,  Arkansas,  during  a  field  trip  sponsored  in  part  by  National  Science 
Foundation  Partnerships-for-Enhancing-Expertise-in-Taxonomy  (PEET)  grant  number  DEB  97- 
12438  to  P.  Sierwald  and  W.  A.  Shear.  This  research  was  also  supported  in  part  by  a  TAMU-T  Faculty 
Senate  Research  Enhancement  grant  to  the  second  author. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1970.  Random  studies  on  Rhysodesmus.  I.  Notes  and  redescriptions  of  miscella- 
neous species.  Radford  Review  24:143-162. 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1978.  On  the  classification  and  phylogeny  of  chelodesmoid  Diplopoda.  Abhand- 
lungen  und  Verhandlungen  des  naturwissenschaften  Vereins  in  Hamburg  21/22:21-31 . 

Hoffman,  R.  L.  1999.  Checklist  of  the  millipeds  of  North  and  Middle  America.  Virginia  Museum  of 
Natural  History  Special  Publication  No.  8:1-584. 

Kenyon,  F.  C.  1893.  A  preliminary  list  of  the  Myriapoda  of  Nebraska,  with  descriptions  of  new 
species.  Publications  of  the  Nebraska  Academy  of  Science  3:14- 18. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1980.  Revision  of  the  milliped  genus  Pleurolonui  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae). 
Canadian  Journal  of  Zoololy  58:129-168. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1987.  The  milliped  Stenodesmus  tuobitus  (Chamberlin)  (Polydesmida:  Xystodes- 
midae) in  Texas  and  New  Mexico.  National  Geographic  Research  3:336-342. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1988.  The  millipeds  of  eastern  Canada  ( Arthropoda:  Diplopoda).  Canadian  Journal  of 
Zoology  66:1638-1663. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1989.  Rhysodesmus  chisosi  new  species,  a  biogeographically  significant  milliped 
from  the  Chisos  Mountains,  Texas  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae).  Southwestern  Naturalist 
34:219-224. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1990.  Occurrences  of  the  millipeds  Thrinaxorin  lanipra  (Chamberlin)  and  Stenodes- 
mus tuobitus  (Chamberlin)  in  eastern  and  southern  Texas  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae).  South- 
western Naturalist  35:96-97. 

Shelley,  R.  M.  1992.  Occurrence  of  the  milliped,  Stenodesmus  tuobitus  (Chamberlin),  west  of  the  Rio 
Grande  (Polydesmida:  Xystodesmidae).  Insecta  Mundi  6:19-21 . 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


POSSIBLE  REPRODUCTION  OF  THE  COMAL  SPRINGS 

RIFFLE  BEETLE,  HETERELMIS  COMALENSIS 

(COLEOPTERA:  ELMIDAE),  IN  CAPTIVITY1 

Joe  N.  Fries: 

ABSTRACT:  Endangered  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetles  have  been  kept  in  captivity  at  the  San  Marcos 
National  Fish  Hatchery  and  Technology  Center  since  1996.  In  2000.  beetle  larvae  were  found  in  an 
aquarium  that  previously  had  only  adults.  None  of  the  larvae  survived  for  more  than  8  months.  One 
adult  beetle  survived  for  19  months. 

KEY  WORDS:  Heterelmis  comalensis,  Coleoptera.  Elmidae,  Texas,  reproduction. 

The  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetle  (Heterelmis  comalensis  Bosse.  Tuff,  and 
Brown)  (Coleoptera:  Elmidae)  occurs  in  spring-runs  of  the  Comal  River  (Comal 
Springs),  New  Braunfels,  Comal  County,  Texas  (Bosse  el  al.  1 988),  and  a  single 
specimen  was  found  in  the  headwaters  of  the  San  Marcos  River,  Hays  County. 
Texas,  in  1992  (Barr  1993).  The  spring  ecosystems  of  both  rivers  are  dependent 
upon  flow  from  the  Edwards  Aquifer  which  also  provides  high  quality  water  to 
meet  an  ever-increasing  human  demand.  Heterelmis  comalensis  was  listed  as  en- 
dangered in  1998  by  the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  (1997),  primarily  be- 
cause of  threats  to  its  habitat.  Additionally,  the  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
(1996)  required  the  development  of  refugium  populations  for  the  listed  species 
from  the  spring  ecosystems  of  the  San  Marcos  and  Comal  rivers. 

Since  July  1996,  the  San  Marcos  National  Fish  Hatchery  and  Technology 
Center  (NFHTC),  San  Marcos,  Texas,  has  been  involved  in  refugium  activities 
for  H.  comalensis.  Beetles  were  collected  from  rocks  in  Comal  Springs  during 
1996-1998  and  brought  to  the  NFHTC.  They  were  identified  as  Heterelmis  using 
Merritt  and  Cummins  (1984)  and  were  presumed  to  be  H.  comalensis  since  the 
only  other  similarly-sized  elmids  known  from  Comal  Springs  are  M.  pnsillus 
(Arsuffi  1993:  Barr  1993)  and  Stenelmis  sp.  (Bowles  et  al.  2000).  Beetles  were 
placed  in  flow-through  (Edwards  Aquifer  water)  aquaria  with  limestone  rocks 
covered  with  algae  from  Comal  Springs.  Aquarium  configuration  was  modified 
several  times,  changing  flow  pattern  and  rate,  rock  arrangement,  and  adding  tem- 
perature-conditioned bio-filtered  recirculated  water.  Although  one  beetle  lived 
for  1 1  months,  survival  was  poor  and  losses  averaged  about  24%  per  month. 

In  January  2000.  43  adult  H.  comalensis  were  collected  at  Comal  Springs 
among  leaf  litter  and  rocks  in  the  springs  emerging  from  the  edge  of  the  spring- 
runs.  Most  of  the  beetles  were  aggregated  on  decaying  leaves  from  anacua 
(Ehretia  anacua),  an  endemic  tree,  and  had  attached  protozoans  which  com- 
monly are  found  on  riffle  beetles  (Brown  1987).  The  beetles  were  placed  in  an 
acid-washed  aquarium  containing  a  mixture  of  flow-through  water  and  recircu- 


1  Received  on  December  7,  2001 :  Accepted  on  November  23.  2003 

;U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  San  Marcos  National  Fish  Hatchery  and  Technology  Center.  5(K) 
East  McCarty  Lane,  San  Marcos.  TX  78666.  U.S.A.  E-mail:  joe_fries<5  fws.gov. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


lated  water,  anacua  leaves  that  had  been  air-dried,  and  limestone  rocks  from  a  ter- 
restrial source.  The  aquarium  was  fitted  with  a  standpipe  and  small-mesh  (about 
0.5-mm)  screening  and  was  covered  with  tight-fitting  plexiglass  to  exclude 
insects  and  other  animals.  IP  April  2000,  five  early  instar  larvae  were  found  in 
this  aquarium  and  removed  to  a  covered,  600-ml  plastic  beaker  for  rearing  to 
adulthood.  The  beaker  was  modified  for  flow-through  of  well  water  and  con- 
tained anacua  leaves  and  a  limestone  rock  for  substrate.  All  of  these  larvae  died 
within  5  months. 

In  September  2000,  33  additional  larvae  were  found,  mostly  on  anacua  leaves, 
in  the  aquarium  with  the  adult  beetles.  One  larva  was  confirmed  as  Heterelmis 
using  Merritt  and  Cummins  (1984)  and  was  presumed  to  be  H.  comalensis,  as 
were  the  remaining  32  larvae.  The  larvae  were  removed  to  the  600-ml  flow- 
through  beaker.  By  December  2000,  only  18  of  these  larvae  survived  and  by  May 
2001  all  of  the  larvae  had  died.  Survival  of  adult  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetles 
during  this  same  8-month  period  also  was  low  (11%).  However,  three  adult  bee- 
tles lived  in  captivity  for  17  months  and  one  of  these  lived  an  additional  2 
months.  Brown  (1973)  noted  that  adults  of//,  vulnerata  can  live  for  several  years 
and  those  of  M.  pusillus  can  live  for  at  least  9  years  in  captivity.  While  it  is  pos- 
sible that  eggs  or  larvae  were  brought  in  from  the  wild  and  simply  developed  fur- 
ther in  captivity,  these  life  stages  were  never  observed  during  collection.  Thus,  it 
is  likely  that  either  female  beetles  with  fertilized  eggs  had  been  collected  or  fer- 
tilization and  larval  development  took  place  in  the  aquarium.  In  either  case,  some 
level  of  early  life  stage  development  occurred  in  captivity.  It  is  demonstrated 
here  that  adult  specimens  of  H.  comalensis  can  survive  for  at  least  1  year,  and 
possibly  reproduce,  in  captivity. 

Captive  culture  of  the  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetle  may  become  important  for 
the  short-term  if  spring-run  habitat  in  the  Comal  River  is  degraded  by  loss  of 
springflow  or  pollution.  However,  survival  of//,  comalensis  can  be  assured  only 
if  springflow  of  high  quality  water  is  maintained. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  Cathy  A.  Kaczmarek,  J.  Murry  Owen,  Paige  A.  Najvar,  and  Ruth  Stanford  for  help  col- 
lecting the  beetles.  I  also  thank  David  E.  Bowles  for  his  help  in  collection  and  identification  of  the 
beetles  and  for  editorial  comments.  Thanks  go  to  J.  Randy  Gibson  for  discovery  of  the  captive-bred 
larvae.  I  am  grateful  for  the  editorial  efforts  of  Loraine  T.  Fries,  William  M.  Seawell,  Paula  J.  Power, 
Thomas  M.  Brandt,  and  several  anonymous  reviewers. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Arsuffi,  T.  L.  1993.  Status  of  the  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetle  (Heterelmis  comalensis  Bosse,  Tuff 
and  Brown),  Peck's  cave  amphipod  (Stygobromus pecki  Holsinger)  and  the  Comal  Springs  dry- 
opid  beetle  (Stygoparnus  comalensis  Barr  and  Spangler).  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  Report. 
Austin,  Texas.  25  pp. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 


Barr,  C.  B.  1993.  Survey  for  two  Edwards  Aquifer  invertebrates:  Comal  Springs  dryopid  beetle 
Stygoparnus  comalensis  Barr  and  Spangler  (Coleoptera:  Dryopidae)  and  Peck's  cave  amphipod 
Stygobromus  pecki  Holsinger  (Amphipoda:  Crangonyctidae).  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
Report.  Austin,  Texas.  70  pp. 

Bosse,  L.  S.,  D.  W.  Tuff,  and  H.  P.  Brown.  1988.  A  new  species  of  Hcicn-lmis  from  Texas  (Coleo- 
ptera: Elmidae).  Southwestern  Naturalist.  33(21:199-203. 

Bowles,  D.  E.,  R.  Stanford,  and  C.  B.  Barr.  2000.  Preliminary  habitat  characterization  and  phe- 
nology of  the  endangered  riffle  beetle  Heterelmis  comalensis  and  a  coexisting  species,  Micro- 
cylloepus pusillus,  (Coleoptera:  Elmidae)  at  Comal  Springs,  Texas,  USA.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service  Report,  Austin,  Texas.  27  pp. 

Brown,  H.  P.  1973.  Survival  records  for  elmid  beetles,  with  notes  on  laboratory  rearing  of  various 
dryopoids  (Coleoptera).  Entomological  News  84:278-284. 

Brown,  H.  P.  1987.  Biology  of  riffle  beetles.  Annual  Review  of  Entomology.  32:253-273. 

Merritt,  R.  W.  and  K.  W.  Cummins.  1 984.  An  introduction  to  the  aquatic  insects  of  North  America. 
Kendall/Hunt  Publishing  Co.  Dubuque,  Iowa.  722  pp. 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  1996.  San  Marcos  and  Comal  Springs  and  Associated  Aquatic 
Ecosystems  (Revised)  Recovery  Plan.  Albuquerque,  New  Mexico.  93  pp. 

U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  1997.  Endangered  and  threatened  wildlife  plants;  final  rule  to  list 
three  aquatic  invertebrates  in  Comal  and  Hays  counties.  Texas,  as  endangered.  Fed.  Reg.  Federal 
Register  62:66295-66304. 


ADDENDUM  — In  February  2004,  larvae  (F2)  produced  from  captive-bred  adults  (Fl)  were  found, 
documenting  completion  of  the  Comal  Springs  riffle  beetle's  entire  lifecycle  in  captivity. 


10  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  PTEROPTRIX 

(HYMENOPTERA:  APHELINIDAE) 

FROM  ARGENTINA,  THE  FIRST  KNOWN  APHELINID 

WITH  THREE-SEGMENTED  TARSI1 

Jung-Wook  Kinr  and  Serguei  V.  Triapitsyn2 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  species  of  aphelinid  wasp,  Pteroptrixfidalgoi,  is  described  and  illustrated  from 
a  single  female  collected  in  the  Province  of  Misiones,  Argentina.  This  is  the  first  known  representa- 
tive of  the  family  Aphelinidae  with  three  tarsal  segments.  The  reduction  in  number  of  tarsal  segments 
in  Chalcidoidea  is  briefly  discussed. 

KEY  WORDS:  Pteroptrixfidalgoi,  Hymenoptera,  Aphelinidae,  Argertina,  three-segmented  tarsi. 

Trichogrammatidae  are  defined  primarily  by  having  three-segmented  tarsi, 
and  secondarily  by  the  antennal  structure,  usually  S-shaped  wing  venation,  a 
broadly  jointed  petiole,  and  a  short  and  straight  protibial  spur.  Among  Chalcidoi- 
dea, three-segmented  tarsi  occur  in  Agaonidae  and  Eulophidae  (Delvare  and 
LaSalle  2000),  and  also  in  Mymaridae  (Huber  and  Beardsley  2000).  A  new  spec- 
ies described  in  this  paper  has  three-segmented  tarsi  and  a  broad  petiole  similar 
to  Trichogrammatidae.  However,  it  clearly  belongs  to  Aphelinidae  based  on  an- 
tennal characteristics,  structure  of  the  mesosoma  and  wing  venation,  and  the 
presence  of  a  curved  and  bifid  protibial  spur. 

This  unusual  specimen  of  Pteroptrix  Westwood  (Aphelinidae:  Coccophagi- 
nae)  was  collected  by  Patricio  Fidalgo  in  Loreto,  Misiones,  Argentina,  which  is 
the  type  locality  of  many  Argentinean  Hymenoptera  collected  by  the  late  Alejan- 
dro A.  Ogloblin.  All  previously  known  species  of  Pteroptrix  have  four  tarsal  seg- 
ments. Other  than  having  three-segmented  tarsi,  this  specimen  appears  to  be  a 
normal  Pteroptrix;  it  has  no  indications  that  it  could  be  an  aberrant  form.  The 
new  species  would  key  to  Pteroptrix  (=Archenomus  Howard  according  to  Hayat 
1983)  if  we  assume  that  it  has  four-segmented  tarsi. 

Generic  placement  of  this  species  in  Aphelinidae  relies  mainly  on  the  anten- 
nal and  tarsal  segmentation,  as  well  as  on  the  presence  or  absence  of  a  linea  calva 
on  the  forewing  (Hayat  1983,  1994).  However,  taxa  with  similar  morphology,  but 
with  different  segmentation  of  the  antenna  or  tarsi,  can  be  placed  in  separate  gen- 
era without  knowing  their  true  affinities.  For  example,  possible  affinities  of 
Bardylis  Howard  to  Coccophagoides  Girault  and  Pteroptrix  to  Encarsia  Foerster 
have  been  suggested  despite  differences  in  the  number  of  tarsal  segments  (see 
discussion  of  Hayat  1998).  Furthermore,  few  studies  have  addressed  the  rela- 
tionships of  Pteroptrix  and  related  genera  (Prinsloo  and  Neser  1990,  Viggiani 
and  Garonna  1993).  Without  convincing  characters  for  supporting  Pteroptrix,  the 
monophyly  of  this  genus  cannot  be  assumed.  We  provisionally  place  the  new 


1  Received  on  January  10.  2002;  Accepted  on  June  18,  2002. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  California,  Riverside,  California  92521 .  U.S.A.  E-mail  of 
author  J-W  K:  argids01@tamu.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


species  into  Pteroptrix,  assuming  that  the  3-segmented  tarsi  have  no  distinguish- 
ing phylogenetic  value.  We  do  not  attempt  to  assess  the  delimitation  of  Pterop- 
trix, which  would  require  a  study  of  the  large  number  of  species  groups  and  a  rig- 
orous phylogenetic  analysis.  Additionally,  a  single  individual  specimen  makes  it 
difficult  to  judge  the  phylogenetic  significance  of  the  new  species.  The  support- 
ing characters  for  its  generic  placement  are  as  follows:  one  seta  on  the  submar- 
ginal  vein,  costal  cell  longer  than  marginal  vein,  and  mesotibial  spur  longer  than 
mesobasitarsus  (Table  1).  While  these  are  diagnostic  features  of  Pteroptrix  (Vig- 
giani  and  Garonna  1993),  unfortunately  these  characters  evidently  overlap  with 
some  other  genera.  As  far  as  we  know,  there  is  no  single  character  that  supports 
the  monophyly  of  Pteroptrix  other  than  having  all  tarsi  with  a  reduced  number 
of  segments  (four-segmented).  Only  the  combination  of  character  states  indicat- 
ed in  Table  1,  including  this  single  species  with  three-segmented  tarsi,  can  be 
used  to  define  Pteroptrix.  Additionally,  this  specimen  has  a  long  and  slender 
'socketed  peg-like  structure'  on  the  mandible  similar  to  other  Pteroptrix  (Fig.  1 1 , 
in  Heraty  and  Schauff  1998). 

The  fauna  of  Pteroptrix  in  the  Neotropical  region  is  poorly  known,  with  only 
three  species  recorded  to  date:  P.  bicolor  (Howard)  and  P.  dimidiata  Westwood, 
both  from  Argentina,  and  P.  howardi  (Dozier)  from  Haiti  and  Puerto  Rico  (Noyes 
1998). 

Terms  for  morphological  features  used  in  the  description  follow  those  of 
Gibson  (1997).  Measurements  are  given  in  micrometers  ((im)  as  length  or.  if 
applicable,  as  length/width.  Explanations  of  measurements  follow  Hayat  ( 1998). 
An  abbreviation  "F"  is  used:  F  =  funicle  segment. 

Genus  Pteroptrix  Westwood,  1833 

Pteroptrix  Westwood,  1833:  344.  Type  species:  Pteroptrix -  dimidiatus Westwood, 
1833:  344,  by  monotypy. 

Pteroptrix  fidalgoi  Kim  &  Triapitsyn,  NEW  SPECIES  (Figs.  1-5) 

Description.  Female  (holotype).  Color.  Body  and  appendages  brown  except  following  pans  dif- 
ferently colored:  face,  vertex,  and  head  above  occipital  suture  orange;  antenna  dusky  orange;  side 
lobe  and  posterior  and  lateral  parts  of  midlobe  of  mesoscutum  orange:  scutellum  white:  trochanters. 
protibia,  apical  third  of  mesotibia,  apical  half  of  metatibiu,  and  tarsi  orange.  Wings  hyaline  except 
forewing  blade  slightly  infuscated  below  venation,  more  so  helo\\  marginal  vein:  venation  bro\\n. 

Head.  Head  width  1 .5  x  of  frontovertex  width;  eye  length  about  1 .5  x  as  long  as  malar  space; 
torulus  below  lower  margin  of  eye;  distance  from  torulus  to  eye  margin  4  \  diameter  of  torulus;  a 
transverse  sulcus  on  the  posterior  of  the  head.  Mandible  tetradentate,  teeth  very  small:  a  long  and 
slender,  socketed,  peg-like  structure  present. 

Antenna  (Fig.  1 ).  8-segmented.  sparsely  setose;  flagellum  spindle-shaped.  Scape  5  x  as  long  as 
broad;  pedicel  longer  than  combined  lengths  of  Fl  and  F2;  both  Fl  and  F2  broader  than  long.  Fl  I  .<•> 
\  longer  than  F2,  F2  0.5  x  as  long  as  F3,  F3  0.6  x  as  wide  as  F3,  F3  appears  to  be  part  of  cla\a  rather 
than  of  funicle;  length  of  two  basal  segments  of  clava  as  long  as  scape,  basal  segment  of  cla\a  slight- 
ly longer  than  wide,  two  following  segments  notably  longer  than  wide,  distal  segment  of  clava 
tapered  at  apex;  funicle  segments  with  I  or  2  short  longitudinal  sensilla  each:  all  three  segments  of 
clava  with  longitudinal  sensilla  each. 


12 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(b) 


Figs.  1-5.  Female  of  Pteroptrixfidalgoi,  new  species:  (1)  antenna;  (2)  mesosoma; 
(3)  wings;  (4)  mesotibia  and  mesotarsus;  (5)  ovipositor. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 


Mesosoma  (Fig.  2).  Pronotum  divided  medially,  each  lobe  with  cellulate  sculpture  and  3  setae. 
Mesoscutum  and  scutellum  with  irregular  cellulate  reticulation.  Mesoscutum  much  longer  than 
scutellum;  midlobe  of  mesoscutum  with  2  pairs  of  setae,  side  lobe  with  I  seta:  axilla  strongly  pro- 
jected forward  into  side  lobe  of  mesoscutum,  slightly  longer  than  wide,  with  1  seta.  Distance  from 
scutellar  placoid  sensillum  to  anterior  seta  less  than  its  diameter:  posterior  pair  of  scutellar  setae 
much  closer  to  each  other  than  are  the  anterior  setae.  Metanotum  and  propodeum  short  and  smooth 
appearing. 

Wings  (Fig.  3).  Forewing  (Fig.  3a)  5.6  x  as  long  as  broad;  submarginal  vein  with  1  seta:  costal 
cell  with  3  setae  medially  and  2  longer  setae  apically:  marginal  vein  0.8  x  length  of  costal  cell,  with 
6  strong  setae  on  anterior  margin.  Chaetotaxy  of  blade  irregular,  with  a  small  bare  area  apical  to  stig- 
mal  vein.  Longest  marginal  cilia  0.8  x  as  long  as  greatest  width  of  wing,  marginal  cilia  on  apical  quar- 
ter of  forewing  more  or  less  of  same  length.  Hind  wing  (Fig.  3b)  7  x  as  long  as  broad;  blade  with  a 
irregular  row  of  microtrichia;  longest  marginal  cilia  about  1 .8  x  as  long  as  greatest  width  of  wing. 

Legs.  All  tarsi  3-segmented.  Mesotibial  spur  markedly  longer  than  basitarsus  (Fig.  4). 

Metasoma.  Ovipositor  (Fig.  5)  1.7  x  as  long  as  mesotibia,  about  4  x  as  long  as  third  valvula: 
slightly  exserted  beyond  apex  of  metasoma;  external  plate  of  ovipositor  with  1  basal  seta  and  2  dis- 
tal setae. 

Measurements.  Body  (length,  without  head):  582.  Head  (width):  193.  Antenna:  scape:  84;  pedi- 
cel: 44;  Fl:  18;  F2:  11:  F3:  22:  clava:  157.  Mesosoma  (length):  215.  Forewing  (length/width):  455/ 
82;  longest  marginal  cilia:  109.  Hind  wing  (length/width):  365/51:  longest  marginal  cilia:  91.  Legs 
(femur,  tibia,  tarsus):  foreleg:  117,  91.  99:  middle  leg:  120.  146,  91;  hind  leg:  110.  153.  99.  Meta- 
soma: 368;  ovipositor:  248. 

Male.  Unknown. 

Type  Material.  Holotype  female  on  slide:  Argentina,  Misiones,  Loreto,  23.viii.2()()().  P.  Fidalgo. 
YPT  [yellow  pan  trap]  in  Ruinas  Jesuiticas  [deposited  in  the  collection  of  Fundacion  e  Institute) 
Miguel  Lillo.  San  Miguel  de  Tucuman.  Argentina  (IMLA)|. 

Etymology.  The  new  species  is  named  after  the  collector.  Dr.  Patrick) 
Fidalgo. 

Distribution.  Known  only  from  the  type  locality  in  the  Province  of  Misiones, 
Argentina. 

Host.  Unknown. 

Comments.  The  new  species  is  unique  among  Pteroptrix  which  otherwise 
have  four  tarsal  segments.  It  has  a  tetradentate  rather  than  tridentate  mandible.  P. 
fukilgoi  new  species  is  similar  to  the  species  from  the  lauri  group  as  defined  by 
Viggiani  and  Garonna  (1993)  based  on  mainly  the  shape  of  the  antenna  and  the 
forewing,  but  that  species  group  has  the  mesotibial  spur  shorter  than  the  mesob- 
asitarsus.  The  incolns  group,  suggested  by  Prinsloo  and  Neser  ( 1990)  for  Archcn- 
omus  and  later  incorporated  in  the  nmritinui  group  of  Pteroptrix  by  Viggiani  and 
Garonna  (1993),  appears  to  be  related  to  P.  fukilgoi  based  on  the  presence  of  a 
transverse  sulcus  on  the  posterior  of  the  head.  However,  the  unique  three-seg- 
mented tarsi  prevent  the  placement  of  the  new  species  in  any  of  the  presently  rec- 
ognized species  groups  (Viggiani  and  Garonna  1993).  Currently,  the  monophyly 
of  each  of  the  five  existing  species  groups  of  Pteroptrix  is  not  well  defined  and 
we  choose  not  to  place  this  new  species  into  a  species  group. 


14 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


2 

<u 


ex 


1 

1 


J= 

O 


o 

<u 
ex 

co 


4) 


a: 
_c 

CO 
Ui 

tj 

k. 
cS 


^O 

"o 


O 

E 


c 

o 

09 

cs 
ex 

o 
U 


E2 


X 

X 

X 

X 

I) 

CL 

B, 

a. 

OJ 

a. 

03 

^3 

P3 

-a 

-o 

•o 

X 

•a 

,g 

•o 

•o 

•o 

Q. 

U 

•o 

V 

c 

C 

c 

c 

^ 

rt 

c3 

tD 

m  m 

O. 

a. 

D. 

<U 

D. 

« 

X 

X 

X 

•a 

X 

E 

V 

V 

V 

c 

OJ 

.a" 

c 

c 

c 

D. 

C 

o 

o 

x 

O 

(35 

Z 

Z 

W 

Z 

H 

o 

E 

-t 

—    ri 

A 

CN 

ri 

13 

__, 

1 

1 

,  , 

K 

o 

u 

•a 

-a 

.0 

^. 

'S. 

'S. 

B 

c 

'a. 

CS 

H 

H 

H 

DD 

CO 

H 

H 

CM    ^ 

H 

H 

H 

H 

E— 

¥    °    0 

2 

2 

^ 

^ 

^ 

•!•      r*    *^ 

A 

Al 

V 

Al 

V 

—     *•*    ^/^ 

on 

on 

on 

on 

—    e  ^* 

H 

H 

H 

H 

H 

Otf  —  S 

§ 

<~  ^ 

>• 

•^  -c   o 

5 

A 

A 

A 

5g 

eg    &£  *- 

A 

A 

A 

A 

VI 

•3   c  U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

U 

es  ±  u 

U 

0 

U 

U 

U 

1^1 

CM           5 

"a> 

°    **  Efl 

^t 

c 

O    **     r- 
3?    *•    5 

'           S        — 

— 

fN 

— 

A 

n 

E 

3 

-a 

-a 

•9 

aj 

u 

(U 

S 

a. 

5. 

D. 

C 

"S 

J= 

en 

"f  "S 

u 

•S  13 

i       O 

o 
'C 

« 

c 

^  "c 

-a 

c 

II 

•a 

C/) 

C/3 

If 

U 

^   - 

L? 

—     •/• 
S  -S 

<s  i  s 

®  S  E 

5     =     4? 

oo 

F-«    03    35 

oo 

^ 

r~ 

oo 

00 

1/5 

B 

"? 

O  "c«    p 
.     >     — 

en 

-^ 

-* 

T' 

-p 

6    U    M 

r<~j 

T$- 

4 

l/^J 

1/~1 

ZSJ     0* 
—      C/3 

en 

"*• 

4 

in 

in 

S. 

S 

p 

do 

S 

^ 

Q 

Ji-- 

-2? 

£ 

•S 

g, 

•~ 

C 

^j 

5J 

J^ 

O 

"2 

OJ 

"P' 

J-J 

>o 

m 

^~-^ 

•^ 

H 

^ 

M 

P 

a; 

o 

03 

<0 

Q 

9 -2P 

O    tLi 


a    So 
r3     4 

^ 

+   H 


•£  °^ 

aj  C' 
<u    ^ 


-G    fi 


,— 

<u 
aj    o 


I  ft 


3    _ 

ex  cs 

OO  ^H 


O    >— '    *j 

g  H    cs 

r'*          C 


7,  ^     HH 

1  f   | 

.•§  E   oo 

co  ^)    CN 

X)  CO       C/3 
O 


.  . 

> 


E 
. 

H 


73 
C 


^  >  ON 

*CJ  13  -^ 

a  c  ^ 

13  '§>  cs 

•*— '  Z3  ^>^ 

c/3  C^  !!^7* 

o  c  =2 

u  •  p-C 

u  >  -s 

U  S  00 


E 

o 

— 

o 

O 

°cz 

cS 


cs    ^_; 

C    ON 
DC  — 

•"      CS 
«J     73 


H 


N 


(U         •!_> 

73      g 
|1 

13 

OJ     to 

;  I 

.^2      _. 


xj     C 
~     cS 

2  I 


r"     >   '  P 

5    ^  co      - 

^   13   -       « 


> 


cs    S 
>>  ex 


u.  cs 

C^  ^ 

~  c 

tjq  '3 

•§  ^ 

cS 


>-. 

<u 


CS    £ 
O     3 


S  ~ 

*     kj 


Vol.  II4.\D.  l..laiiuai\  ^  K-hruaiA  21)03 13 

DISCUSSION 

The  reduction  of  tarsal  segments  in  Chalcidoidea  is  a  phenomenon  that  is  still 
poorly  understood.  In  the  Mymaridae,  for  instance,  tarsomere  number  has  been 
used  in  the  past  to  subdivide  the  family  into  subfamilies  and  tribes;  however, 
apparently  closely  related  genera  such  as  Camptoptera  Foerster  (tarsi  five-seg- 
mented) and  Eufoersteria  Mathot  (tarsi  four-segmented,  two  apical  tarsomeres 
likely  fused)  would  end  up  in  different  subfamilies  if  only  this  character  is  con- 
sidered. As  Huber  and  Lin  (1999,  p.  38)  wrote,  "Reduction  in  tarsomere  number 
from  5  to  4  has  likely  occurred  several  times  in  Mymaridae . . .  Clearly,  loss  or 
perhaps  fusion  of  segments,  whether  antennal  or  tarsal,  occurs  much  more  fre- 
quently than  previously  realized,  necessitating  a  re-evaluation  of  generic  limits 
in  several  groups.  Unfortunately,  in  the  past,  too  much  reliance  was  placed  on  the 
number  and  constancy  of  appendage  segments  for  defining  genera,  with  the 
result  that  several  genera,  not  only  in  the  Camptoptera  group,  are  too  narrowly 
defined." 

We  fully  agree  with  the  above  quote  and  believe  that  the  recent  discoveries  of 
non-trichogrammatid  Chalcidoidea  with  three-segmented  tarsi,  such  as  the  genus 
Trisecodes  Delvare  and  LaSalle  (Eulophidae:  Entedoninae)  (Delvare  and  LaSalle 
2000),  as  well  as  this  new  species  of  Pteroptrix,  further  support  the  necessity  of 
reconsidering  the  practice  of  using  appendage  segmentation  as  the  sole  or  main 
basis  for  definition  of  some  groups. 

In  some  groups  of  Chalcidoidea,  reductions  in  the  number  of  appendage  seg- 
ments may  be  associated  with  the  adaptations  for  parasitization  of  smaller  hosts. 
For  instance,  in  species  of  the  mymarid  genus  Erythmelns  Enock,  which  are  par- 
asitoids  of  eggs  of  Tingidae,  a  reduction  of  funicle  segments  from  six  to  five  is 
rather  common.  This  may  be  due  either  to  the  outright  loss  of  a  segment  or  to  the 
fusion  of  any  two  neighboring  segments  (S.  V.  Triapitsyn,  unpublished  data). 
Furthermore,  the  funicle  of  one  species  of  Erythme his  is  four-segmented  due  to 
a  further  fusion  of  two  segments  following  the  initial  loss  of  a  funicle  segment 
(Triapitsyn  and  Fidalgo  2001 ). 

Parasitoids  of  armored  scales  (Diaspididae)  sometimes  have  a  reduced  num- 
ber of  tarsal  segments  when  compared  with  taxa  from  the  same  family  that  par- 
asitize different,  and  often  larger,  hosts.  For  instance,  two  of  the  three  known 
genera  of  Encyrtidae  that  have  four-segmented  tarsi,  Anthemns  Howard  and 
Arrhenophagus  Aurivillius  (the  other  is  Tetracyclos  Kryger,  probably  parasitiz- 
ing Pseudococcidae),  belong  to  two  different  tribes;  both  are  minute  in  size  and 
both  are  parasitoids  of  Diaspididae. 

As  noted  above,  occasional  reductions  in  the  number  of  tarsal  and  especially 
funicle  segments  in  Chalcidoidea  may  occur  independently,  and  are  not  neces- 
sarily the  result  of  a  single  event.  There  are  three  genera  of  Aphelinidae  with  a 
4-4-4  tarsal  formula:  Eretmoccrus  Haldeman,  Banlylis,  and  I'tcroptrix.  Banlylis 
and  Pteroptrix  are  morphologically  similar  to  Coccophagoides  and  Encarsia 
respectively,  and  both  have  been  separated  from  similar  genera  based  on  the 


16  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


tarsal  segmentation.  Hay  at  (1998)  noted  the  striking  similarity  between 
Pteroptrix  and  Encarsia,  especially  the  citrina  species  group  of  Encarsia  (for- 
merly Aspidiotiphagus  Howard,  all  tarsi  five-segmented,  parasitic  on  Diaspidi- 
dae).  Additionally,  the  number  of  tarsal  segments  separates  tetramerous  Bardylis 
from  pentamerous  Coccophagoides  despite  their  possible  affinity  and  similarity 
(Hay at  1998).  However,  correlation  of  host  size  and  segment  reduction  is  not 
clear.  The  most  widely  used  hosts  of  Aphelinidae  are  various  Diaspididae  and 
Aleyrodidae  (Hayat  1998).  These  hosts  are  utilized  by  various  aphelinid  genera 
with  either  non-reduced  or  reduced  tarsal  and  antennal  segmentation.  Without  a 
careful  study  of  the  characters  of  the  above  genera,  it  is  questionable  whether  the 
biology  of  parasitism  on  Diaspididae  and  a  possible  correlation  with  the  reduc- 
tions in  some  characters  can  be  used  to  support  the  grouping.  For  example,  the 
monophyly  of  the  Diaspididae-parasitizing  species  of  Encarsia  was  not  support- 
ed by  morphological  and  molecular  analyses  and  they  were  scattered  in  three  dif- 
ferent places  on  the  phylogenetic  tree  (Babcock  et  al.  2001). 

Nevertheless,  reduction  of  tarsal  segmentation  within  Encarsia  has  been 
shown  to  be  phylogenetically  informative  (Babcock  et  al.  2001).  For  example, 
the  monophyly  of  the  luteola  group  (parasitoids  on  Aleyrodidae)  of  Encarsia, 
with  a  four-segmented  mesotarsus,  was  strongly  supported  (Babcock  et  al. 
2001).  The  phylogenetically  informative  reduction  in  this  species  group  is  in 
direct  contrast  to  the  idea  that  four-segmented  tarsi  could  have  evolved  multiple 
times  and  could  not  be  informative  in  Aphelinidae.  At  the  generic  level,  howev- 
er, reduction  of  tarsal  segments  has  not  always  proven  to  be  informative  within 
this  family.  Due  to  inconclusive  and  putative  relationships  among  Aphelinidae 
based  on  different  number  of  tarsal  segments,  reduction  cannot  be  used  by  itself 
to  justify  designation  of  a  new  genus  for  this  new  species. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Patricio  Fidalgo  (San  Miguel  de  Tucuman,  Argentina)  for  collecting  the  specimen  and 
making  it  available  for  this  study,  Mohammad  Hayat  (Aligarh  Muslim  University,  Aligarh,  India)  for 
confirming  our  preliminary  identification  of  the  new  species  as  a  Pteroptrix,  and  John  Heraty,  James 
Munro,  and  Douglas  Yanega  (University  of  California,  Riverside,  USA)  for  critically  reviewing  the 
manuscript.  We  also  thank  an  anonymous  reviewer  for  comments.  This  study  was  funded  in  part  by 
NSF  grant  (DEB-PEET  #9978150). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Babcock,  C.  S.,  J.  M.  Heraty,  P.  J.  De  Barro,  F.  Driver,  and  S.  Schmidt.  200 1 .  Preliminary  phy- 
logeny  of  Encarsia  Forster  (Hymenoptera:  Aphelinidae)  based  on  morphology  and  28S  rDNA. 
Molecular  Phylogeny  and  Evolution  18(2):306-323. 

Delvare,  G.  and  J.  LaSalle.  2000.  Trisecodes  gen.  n.  (Hymenoptera:  Eulophidae:  Entedoninae),  the 
first  eulophid  with  three  tarsal  segments.  Journal  of  Hymenoptera  Research  9(2):305-312. 

Gibson,  G.  A.  P.  1997.  Chapter  2.  Morphology  and  terminology,  p. 16-44.  //;:  G.  A.  P.  Gibson,  J.  T. 
Huber  and  J.  B.  Woolley,  eds.  Annotated  keys  to  the  genera  of  Nearctic  Chalcidoidea  (Hymenop- 
tera). NRC  Research  Press,  Ottawa,  Ontario,  Canada,  794  pp. 

Hayat,  M.   1983.  The  genera  of  Aphelinidae  (Hymenoptera).  Systematic  Entomology  8:63-102. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


Hayat,  M.  1994.  Notes  on  some  genera  of  the  Aphelinidae  (Hymenoptera:  Chalcidoidea).  \\  ith  com- 
ments on  the  classification  of  the  family.  Oriental  Insects  28:81-96. 

Hayat,  M.  1998.  Aphelinidae  of  India  (Hymenoptera:  Chalcidoidea):  a  taxonomic  revision.  Mem- 
oirs on  Entomology,  International  13:1-416. 

Heraty,  J.  M.  and  M.  E.  Schauff.  1998.  Mandibular  teeth  in  Chalcidoidea:  function  and  phyloge- 
ny.  Journal  of  Natural  History  32:1227-1244. 

Huber,  J.  T.  and  J.  W.  Beardsley.  2000.  A  new  genus  of  fairyfly,  Kikiki.  from  Hawaiian  Islands 
(Hymenoptera:  Mymaridae).  Proceedings  of  the  Hawaiian  Entomological  Society  34:65-70. 

Huber,  J.  T.  and  N.  Q.  Lin.  1999.  World  review  of  the  Camptoptera  group  of  genera  (Hymenoptera: 
Mymaridae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Ontario  130:21-65. 

Noyes,  J.  S.  1998.  Catalogue  of  the  Chalcidoidea  of  the  world.  ETI,  The  Natural  History  Museum. 
CD-ROM. 

Polaszek,  A.  and  M.  Hayat.  1 992.  A  revision  of  the  genera  Dirphys  Howard  and  Encarsiella  Hayat 
(Hymenoptera:  Aphelinidae).  Systematic  Entomology  17:181-197. 

Prinsloo,  G.  L.  and  O.  C.  Neser.  1990.  The  southern  African  species  of  Archenomus  Howard 
(Hymenoptera:  Aphelinidae)  with  a  key  to  the  species  of  the  World.  Entomology  Memoir  Depart- 
ment of  Agricultural  Development,  Republic  of  South  Africa  79:1-26. 

Triapitsyn,  S.  V.  and  P.  Fidalgo.  2001 .  A  new  species  of  Erythmelus  Enock,  1909  (Hymenoptera: 
Mymaridae),  egg  parasitoid  of  Acanthocheila  armigera  (Stal,  1858)  (Hemiptera:  Tingidae)  in 
Brazil.  Russian  Entomological  Journal  10(2):163-165. 

Viggiani,  G.  and  A.  P.  Garonna.  1993  (1991).  Le  specie  italiane  del  complesso  Archenomus 
Howard,  Archenoiuisciis  Nikolskaja,  Hispaniella  Mercet  e  Pteroptrix  Westwood.  con  nuove  com- 
binazioni  generiche  (Hymenoptera:  Aphelinidae).  Bollettino  del  Laboratorio  di  Entomologia 
Agraria  "Filippo  Silvestri"  48:57-88. 

Westwood,  J.  O.  1833.  Description  of  several  new  British  forms  among  the  parasitic  hymenopter- 
ous  insects.  Philosophical  Magazine  3:342-344. 


18  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  LEPTOGLOSSUS  (HETEROPTERA: 

COREIDAE:  ANISOSCELINI)  ASSOCIATED  WITH  THE 

AMAZONIAN  PALM  MAURITIA  FLEXUOSA 

(ARECACEAE:  LEPIDOCARYEAE)  IN  PERU1 

Harry  Brailovsky;  and  Guy  Couturier1 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  species,  Leptoglossus  Hesperus  (Heteroptera:  Coreidae),  collected  in  the  Ama- 
zonian palm  Mauritia  flexuosa  (Arecaceae:  Lepidocaryeae),  is  described  from  Peru  and  compared 
with  L.  lonchoulcs  Allen.  The  hind  leg  and  male  genital  capsule  are  illustrated. 

KEY  WORDS:  Li'ptoc\>h>stnis,  Heteroptera,  Coreidae,  Mauritia  flexrosa,  Arecaceae. 

Previous  to  this  paper  only  one  species  of  Leptoglossus,  (L.  lonchoides  Allen 
1969)  has  been  associated  with  palms  (Couturier  et  al.,  1993,  Schaeffer  and 
Panizzi  2000,  and  Howard  et  al.,  2001 ). 

Leptoglossus  lonchoides  was  reported  damaging  fruits  of  Bactris  gasipaes  H. 
B.  K.  (Paltnae),  in  Central  Amazonia.  The  fruit  suffered  premature  fruit  fall  that 
considerably  reduced  yields  in  Manaus,  Brazil  (Couturier  et  al.  1993). 

In  this  contribution,  we  add  a  second  species  of  Leptoglossus  associated  with 
the  Amazonian  palm  Mauritia  flexuosa  L.  f.,  in  which  the  fruit  is  harvested  by 
the  rural  population  in  the  Peruvian  Amazon  to  be  consumed  as  fresh  product 
(Padoch  1988).  The  presence  of  both  adults  and  nymphs  on  the  palm  trees  indi- 
cates that  L.  hesperus,  completes  its  entire  life  cycle  in  this  palm. 

In  addition  to  L.  hesperus  four  other  species  of  Leptoglossus  are  recorded 
from  the  Peruvian  region:  L.  cinctus  (H.  S.),  L.flavosignatus  Blote,  L.  neovexil- 
Icitus  Allen,  and  L.  zonatus  (Dallas)  (Allen  1969,  and  Brailovsky  and  Barrera 
1998). 

Acronyms  used  is  this  paper  are:  Museum  National  d'  Histoire  Naturelle, 
Paris,  France  (MNHN),  Universidad  Agraria  La  Molina,  Museo  de  Entomologfa, 
Lima,  Peru  (UAMP),  and  Coleccion  Entomologica,  Instituto  de  Biologia,  Uni- 
versidad Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico  (UNAM).  All  measurements  are  given 
in  millimeters. 

Leptoglossus  hesperus,  NEW  SPECIES 

Figures  2-3 

Description.  Male.  Dorsal  coloration.  Head:  dark  orange  with  three  broad 
black  stripes,  two  lateral  to  midline,  the  other  close  to  eyes;  antennal  segment  I 
black  with  inner  face  dirty  orange,  segments  II  and  III  pale  chestnut  orange  with 


1  Received  on  March  26,  2002;  Accepted  on  June  13,  2002. 

Department  de  Zoologfa,  Instituto  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Apartado  Postal  No.  70 1 53,  Mexico,  045 10 
D.F.  Mexico.  H-mail:  coreidae @servidor.unam.mx. 

'ORSTOM,  Institut  trancais  de  recherche  scicntil'ique  pour  de  devcloppement  en  cooperation.  213, 
rue  La  Fayette,  F-75480  Paris  Cedex  10,  France. 

Mailed  on  April  '),  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  I .  January  &  Fchruary  2003 19_ 

apical  joint  black,  and  IV  pale  chestnut  brown  with  basal  third  dark  chestnut 
orange.  Pronotum:  anterolateral,  posterolateral,  and  posterior  border  dirty  yel- 
low; disc  pale  reddish  brown,  tinged  with  yellow;  collar,  anterior  margin,  lateral 
portion  of  calli,  anterolateral  margin  near  the  border,  and  humeral  angle  black. 
Scutellum:  pale  reddish  brown  with  apex  yellow.  Hemelytra:  clavus  and  corium 
pale  reddish  brown  with  costal  margin  yellow;  corium  with  light  yellow  irregu- 
lar, transverse  fascia;  hemelytral  membrane  uniformly  dark.  Abdomen:  connex- 
ivum  pale  chestnut  orange  with  anterior  third  and  upper  margin  yellow;  dorsal 
abdominal  segments  black  with  posterior  margin  of  segments  III  to  VI  yellow. 
Ventral  coloration.  Head  dirty  orange  yellow  with  four  discoidal  spots,  two 
close  to  postocular  tubercle,  and  the  other  two  near  middle  third  and  close  to  pos- 
terior margin;  rostral  segments  I  and  II  dirty  yellow,  and  III  and  IV  bright  red- 
dish orange;  thorax  and  abdomen  dirty  orange  yellow  with  numerous  small  black 
spots;  prosternum,  lateral  margins  of  mesosternum,  and  metasternum  black;  an- 
terior and  posterior  lobe  of  metathoracic  peritreme  yellow;  fore  and  middle  legs 
bright  chestnut  orange;  hind  leg  with  coxae,  trochanters,  femur  and  tarsi  bright 
chestnut  orange;  hind  tibiae  bright  chestnut  orange  with  outer  and  inner  dilation 
bright  reddish  brown;  genital  capsule  dirty  orange  yellow;  rim  of  abdominal  spir- 
acles dirty  yellow. 

Structure.  Body  medium  sized.  Head:  tylus  unarmed,  rounded  apically,  ex- 
tending anteriorly  to  the  jugae,  and  slightly  raised  in  lateral  view;  rostrum  reach- 
ing anterior  third  of  abdominal  sternite  VI;  rostral  segment  III  extending  to  at 
least  posterior  margin  of  metasternum.  Pronotum:  collar  wide;  each  pronotal 
margin  entire;  humeral  angles  rounded  to  obtuse,  and  not  exposed;  calli  slightly 
elevated,  impunctate,  without  two  medial  tubercles;  surface  densely  punctate; 
disc  posteriorly  with  median  longitudinal  carina  obsolete.  Legs.  Hind  tibiae: 
outer  dilation  short,  lanceolate,  entire,  without  emarginations,  occupying  39%  of 
the  length  of  hind  tibiae,  width  of  outer  dilation  wider  than  width  of  inner  dila- 
tion; inner  dilation  lanceolate,  entire,  without  emarginations,  shorter  than  outer, 
occupying  37%  of  the  length  of  hind  tibiae;  undilated  portion  of  hind  tibiae  with- 
out spine-like  teeth  (Fig.  2).  Scutellum:  triangular,  longer  than  wide,  flat,  with- 
out median  longitudinal  carina;  apex  subtruncated.  Genitalia.  Genital  capsule: 
posteroventral  edge  with  median  notch,  deep  and  rounded;  dorsal  prongs  promi- 
nently acute,  and  projecting  medially  (Fig.  3). 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male.  Antenna!  segment  I  dirty  orange,  seg- 
ments II  and  III  bright  chestnut  orange  with  apical  third  black,  and  IV  pale  chest- 
nut brown  with  basal  joint  black;  rostral  segments  I  to  IV  dirty  yellow;  connexi- 
val  segments  VIII  and  IX  dirty  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX 
black  with  posterior  margin  of  VIII  yellow;  hind  tibiae  bright  chestnut  orange 
with  outer  and  inner  dilation  bright  reddish  brown  with  whitish  yellow  irregular 
maculae  near  middle  third;  genital  plates  dirty  orange  yellow;  rim  of  abdominal 
spiracles  light  brown  to  yellow.  Structure.  Rostrum  reaching  anterior  margin  of 
abdominal  sternite  IV;  rostral  segment  III  reaching  middle  third  of  metasternum. 
Legs.  Hind  tibiae:  outer  dilation  short,  lanceolate,  entire,  occupying  57%  of  the 


20 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


length  of  hind  tibiae,  width  of  outer  dilation  wider  than  width  of  inner  dilation; 
inner  dilation  lanceolate,  entire,  shorter  than  outer,  occupying  35%  of  the  length 
of  hind  tibiae;  undilated  portion  of  hind  tibiae  with  two  small  spine-like  teeth. 


Figures  1-3.  Leptoglossus  spp.  1-2.  Hind  leg.  1.  L.  lonchoides  Allen.  2.  L.  Hesperus 
Brailovsky  and  Couturier.  3.  Caudal  view  of  the  male  genital  capsule  of  L.  Hesperus 
Brailovsky  and  Couturier. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


Measurements,  (male,  followed  by  female).  Head  length  2.35. 2.70.  width  across  eyes  1 .42.  2.30. 
interocular  space  1.02.  1.35.  interocellar  space  0.47,  0.67.  preocular  distance  1.50.  1.67:  length  of 
antennal  segments:  I.  2.35,  2.75.  II.  3.90.4.20,  III.  2.65.  3.00.  IV.  4.35. 4.66.  Pronotum:  Length  2.55. 
3.70,  maximum  width  across  calli  2.10,  2.65,  maximum  width  across  humeral  angles  3.90, 5.2(1.  Hind 
tibiae:  Total  length  7.15,  8.23,  length  outer  dilation  2.85.  4.60,  length  inner  dilation  2.65,  2.90,  max- 
imum width  outer  dilation  0.36, 0.61,  maximum  width  inner  dilation  0.21 .0.35.  Scutellar  length  1.65, 
2.45,  width  1 .50.  2.30.  Body  length  15.50,  19.30. 

Type  material.  Holotype:  Cf .  Peru:  Departamento  Loreto,  Iquitos,  km  8  carr.  Iquitos-Nauta.  6-II- 
2001 ,  J.  Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado  (MNHN).  Paratype:  I  male,  same  location  as  holotype  (UNAM  I.  1 
female,  Peru:  Departamento  Loreto,  Iquitos,  Zungarococha,  25-IX-2001 ,  J.  Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado 
(UAMP).  1  male,  Peru:  Departamento  Loreto.  Iquitos.  km  17.5  carr.  Iquitos-Nauta,  25-V-2001.  J. 
Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado  (UAMP).  2  males,  Peru:  Departamento  Loreto,  Iquitos,  Santa  Clara  "Simon 
Bolivar,"  28-VIII-2001 ,  J.  Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado  (MNHN).  1  female,  Peru:  Departamento  Loreto, 
Quisococha.  I  l-V-2001 ,  J.  Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado  (UNAM).  All  specimens  were  collected  on  the 
Amazonian  palm  Mauritiaflexuosa  (Arecaceae:  Lepidocaryeae). 

Biology.  Males,  females,  and  nymphs  of  Leptoglossus  Hesperus  were  collect- 
ed on  the  inflorescences  of  the  Amazonian  palm  Mauritiaflexuosa  (Arecaceae: 
Lepidocaryeae),  growing  in  an  ecosystem  referred  to  as  named  "aguaje  enano" 
or  "dwarf  aguaje,"  in  the  surrounding  area  of  Iquitos.  Department  of  Loreto.  in 
Peru. 

Mauritiaflexuosa  is  a  dioic  palm  that  grows  on  periodically  or  permanently 
flooded  areas.  It  is  distributed  throughout  northern  South  America,  east  of  the 
Andes  (below  500  m),  and  is  recorded  from  Brazil  (from  northern  Amazonia  to 
the  state  of  Bahia),  Colombia,  Ecuador,  the  Guianas,  Peru,  Trinidad  and  Venezu- 
ela. The  height  of  the  adult  plant  reaches  25  m,  the  inflorescences  are  more  than 
2  m  long,  and  each  female  inflorescence  can  carry  400  to  500  fruits  (Henderson 
etal.,  1995). 

Discussion.  This  species  is  most  similar  to  L.  lonchoides  Allen,  in  having  the 
thorax  and  abdomen  dirty  orange  yellow  with  numerous  small  black  spots,  the 
corium  with  yellow  irregular  transverse  fascia,  hind  tibiae  with  the  outer  and 
inner  dilation  lanceolate,  entire,  without  emarginations,  and  the  posteroventral 
edge  of  male  genital  capsule  with  deep  median  notch,  and  prominent  dorsal 
prongs  (Fig.  3).  In  L.  hesperus  new  species,  the  width  of  outer  and  inner  dilations 
of  the  hind  tibiae  are  smaller  (Figs.  1-2),  and  the  rostrum  in  males  extends  to  the 
anterior  third  of  abdominal  sternite  VI  and  on  to  the  anterior  margin  of  abdomi- 
nal sternite  IV  in  females.  In  L.  lonchoides,  the  rostrum  is  shorter,  usually  reach- 
ing only  the  posterior  margin  of  abdominal  sternite  III. 

Etymology.  From  the  Latin  "hesperus"  meaning  west. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  the  team  of  the  Institute  de  Investigaciones  de  la  Amazonia  Peruana  (HAP)  working  in 
the  "dwarf  amiaje"  region  who  made  available  specimens  of  the  new  species,  particularly  Joel 
Vazquez  and  C.  Delgado,  who  collected  the  type  series.  Also  special  thanks  are  given  to  Ernesto 
Barrera  (UNAM)  for  preparing  the  drawings. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Allen,  R.  C.   1969.  A  revision  of  the  genus  Lci>tt>xlt><i.\i<\  Guerin  (Hemiptera:  Corcidae).  Ento- 
mologica  Americana  45:  35-140. 


22  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Brailovsky,  H.  and  E.  Barrera.  1 998.  A  review  of  the  Costa  Rican  species  of  Leptoglossus  Guerin, 
with  descriptions  of  two  new  species  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera:  Coreidae:  Coreinae:  Anisosce- 
lini).  Proceedings  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  50:  167-184. 

Couturier,  G.,  C.R.  Clement,  and  P.  Viana  Filho.  1993.  Leptoglossus  lonchoides  Allen 
(Heteroptera.  Coreidae),  causante  de  la  caida  de  los  frutos  de  Bactris  gasipaes  (Palmae)  en  la 
Amazonia  Central.  Turrialba  41:293-298. 

Henderson,  A.,  G.  Galeano,  and  R.  Bernal.  1995.  Field  guide  to  the  palms  of  the  Americas. 
Princeton  Univ.  Press.  Princeton,  N.  J.  352  pp. 

Howard,  F.W.,  D.  Moore,  R.M.  Giblin,  and  R.G.  Abad.  2001 .  Insects  of  palms.  CABI  Publishing, 
Wallingford.  Oxon,  U.  K.  400  pp. 

Padoch,  C.  1988.  Aguaje  (Mauritia  flexuosa  L.  f)  in  the  economy  of  Iquitos,  Peru.  Advances  in 
Economic  Botany  6:  214-224. 

Schaeffer,  C.W.  and  A.R.  Panizzi.  2000.  Heteroptera  of  economic  importance.  CRC  Press.  Boca 
Raton,  FL.  828  pp. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  Januarv  &  February  2003 


WINTER  AGGREGATION  OF  HARMOMA  AXYRIDIS 

(COLEOPTERA:  COCCINELLIDAE)  IN  A  CONCRETE 

OBSERVATION  TOWER1 

Paul  \V.  Schaefer 

ABSTRACT:  Aggregations  of  thousands  of  multicolored  Asian  lady  beetles.  Harmonia  axyridis. 
have  appeared  each  fall  since  1993  in  a  20.1  m  high  concrete  observation  tower  at  Mt.  Gretna. 
Lebanon  County.  Pennsylvania.  The  tower  is  located  in  a  clearing  on  a  ridge  in  otherwise  regenerat- 
ed oak-maple-birch  forests  in  Clarence  Schock  Memorial  Park  at  Governor  Dick  (326  m  elevation. 
40  14.78'  N.  76"  27.35'  \V).  Beetles  aggregate  in  the  ceiling  wall  comers  on  four  different  levels  in 
the  tower's  internal  ladder\\a\s.  Since  the  to\\er  is  open  to  the  public  for  recreational  purposes,  one 
can  visit  the  tower  in  late  fall  and  witness  these  aggregations.  During  some  winters,  mortality  appears 
very  high,  suggesting  that  the  tower  lacks  adequate  insulative  properties  for  optimum  survival. 

KEY  WORDS:  Harmonia  axyridis.  Coleoptera.  Coccinellidae.  winter  aggregation,  lady  beatle. 
overwintering  mortality,  fall  flight  behavior. 

Since  the  multicolored  Asian  lady  beetle.  Harmonia  axyridis  (Pallas)  was  first 
detected  in  North  America  (Louisiana)  in  1988  (Chapin  &  Brou  1991).  there  has 
been  considerable  interest  in  this  beneficial  predator  of  aphids.  Although  it  has 
had  a  positive  impact  against  aphid  pests  [e.g.  on  pecan  in  the  Southeast  (Tedders 
&  Schaefer  1994:  De  Quattro  1995)  and  apple  orchards  in  West  Virginia  (Brown 
and  Miller  1998)].  it  has  also  irritated  many  homeowners  when  adult  beetles 
begin  aggregating  in  the  fall,  alighting  on  and  entering  homes  and  other  build- 
ings seeking  sites  for  overwintering  (see  Kidd  ci  al.  1995  regarding  the  human 
impact).  Nalepa  et  al.  (1996)  investigated  aspects  of  H.  axyrulis  biology  (sex 
ratio,  dimorphism,  phenotype.  parasitism)  in  winter  aggregations  and  later  aggre- 
gation behavior  in  response  to  artificial  shelters  (suggestive  of  bee  hives)  and  the 
utilization  of  active  apiary  bee  hives  as  aggregation  sites  (Nalepa  cr  al.  2000).  I 
provide  a  description  of  a  large  observation  tower  (See  web  address  for  illustra- 
tion), similar  to  the  silo  illustrated  in  De  Quattro  (1995).  located  in  south  central 
Pennsylvania,  that  appears  to  meet  criteria  for  successful  H.  ti.\yruiis  aggrega- 
tion, and  that  is  readily  accessible  to  the  public. 

METHODS 

Tower  Site.  Located  in  Clarence  Schock  Memorial  Park  at  Governor  Dick. 
West  Cornwall  district  near  Mt.  Gretna.  Lebanon  Co..  Pennsylvania,  a  natural!) 
regenerated  forest,  is  a  cylindrical,  reinforced  steel  and  concrete  observation 
tower  (20.1  m  high  and  4.6  m  in  diameter)  built  on  the  crest  of  a  ridge  (326  m 
elevation.  40'  14.78'  N.  76°  27.35'  W)  to  provide  a  panoramic  \  iew  of  the  sur- 
rounding countryside.  The  tower  is  reached  by  a  30-miiuite  walk  and  is  used  b\ 
recreational  hikers  who  ascend  the  tower's  internal  ladderways  to  reach  the 
observation  deck  on  top  for  a  view  from  above  the  surrounding  forest  canop\ 


1  Received  March  2.  2001 .  Accepted  Ma\  6.  2001 . 

'  Beneficial  Insects  Introduction  Research  I'nit.  ISP  \.  \KS.  501  S  Chapel  St  .  Newark.  Delaware 
19713.  U.S.A.  E-mail:  pschaefer@biir.ars.usda.gov. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


24  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


The  tower  sits  in  a  small  clearing  that  was  enlarged  in  1996  but  is  otherwise  sur- 
rounded by  forests  of  hardwoods  and  a  few  conifers. 

After  first  observing  the  tower  in  spring  1994, 1  made  from  one  to  three  annu- 
al fall  and  then  some  follow-up  spring  inspections  of  the  tower  from  1994  to 
2002.  During  many  visits,  I  photographed  the  aggregations,  collected  some  or  all 
available  beetles  for  unrelated  studies,  and  on  specific  visits  (Nov.  2000)  took  a 
GPS  fix  using  a  Model  GPS  III  Plus  (Garmin  Corp.,  Olathe,  Kansas,  USA)  and 
light  intensity  readings  (March  1998)  of  the  external  surface  and  internal  ladder- 
ways  using  a  Minolta  Auto  Light  Meter  IV  F,  using  spherical,  flat  and  mini- 
receptor  (Minolta  Co,  Ltd,  Japan).  I  measured  the  relative  light  intensity  in  full 
sun  away  from  the  tower,  on  the  outer  surface,  at  the  entrance  level,  and  in  the 
four  upper  levels,  both  ¥2  m  directly  inside  of  the  slit  window,  and  in  the  actual 
ceiling  comers  where  the  aggregations  occurred. 

On  three  consecutive  inspections  (1995  -  1997),  I  collected  all  exposed  bee- 
tles aggregated  on  the  south  ladderway  of  the  tower  and  isolated  samples  from 
each  of  the  four  levels  (Figure  1 ).  Beetles  were  brushed  into  a  square  plastic  fun- 
nel, transferred  to  paper  cartons,  and  returned  to  the  laboratory.  Individual  con- 
tainers from  each  level  were  weighed,  weight  of  beetles  alone  was  calculated, 
and  beetles  were  then  counted. 

On  many  visits  the  progress  of  the  aggregation  formation  was  noted,  pho- 
tographed, appreciated,  and  then  left  for  future  visitors  or  visits. 

RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

The  tower  was  first  found  to  contain  aggregations  of  H.  axyridis  in  the  fall  of 
1993.  A.  G.  "Al"  Wheeler,  Jr.  (formerly  at  Penn.  Dept.  Agric.,  Harrisburg,  now 
Clemson  Univ.)  first  learned  of  the  beetle  aggregations  from  a  Harrisburg  co- 
worker  and  visited  the  site  that  same  season.  In  mid- April  1994,  Al  and  I  visited 
the  tower  to  find  large  quantities  of  dead  beetles  at  all  aggregation  sites.  We 
found  only  a  few  live  beetles  crawling  about  the  outer  tower  surface.  We  con- 
cluded that  either  beetle  survival  had  been  very  low  or  that  all  other  survivors  had 
already  dispersed  into  nearby  forests.  We  concluded  that  the  intervening  winter 
had  killed  large  proportions  of  aggregated  beetles.  The  tower  was  acceptable  for 
aggregation  but  appeared  to  provide  insufficient  protection  (e.g.  low  tempera- 
tures, desiccation)  for  optimal  overwintering  survival. 

Based  on  the  1995  -  1997  beetle  collections,  mean  numbers  (based  on  15,016 
beetles  collected),  showed  a  slight  but  statistically  insignificant  decrease  of  bee- 
tles with  tower  height  (Table  1 ).  Thus  beetles  flew  onto  the  tower  irrespective  of 
height  and  entered  the  slit-like  windows  (10  x  30  cm)  at  all  levels  equally  and 
tended  to  avoid  the  tower  entrance.  This  suggests  that  beetle  flights  occur  uni- 
formly at  levels  up  to  ca.  20  m  in  the  vicinity  of  the  tower.  Mean  calculated 
weight  of  an  individual  beetle  in  1997  was  33.25  mg  (n=5,762).  Captured  bee- 
tles were  used  for  various  research  purposes,  including  our  attempt  to  identify 
possible  aggregation  pheromones  and  potentially  useful  repellants  (in  collabora- 
tion with  Jeffrey  Aldrich,  USDA,  ARS,  Beltsville,  MD). 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 ,  January  &  February  2003 


25 


Observation  deck  (not  shown) 


LEVEL  4 


Aggregation  site 


Slit  windows 


LEVELS  2  &  3 
(not  shown) 


LEVEL  1 
Aggregation  site 

Steel  ladders 


ENTRANCE  LEVEL 


Unacceptable  site 


Tower  entrance 


Figure  1:  Observation  tower  at  Clarence  Schock  Memorial  Park  at  Governor  Dick,  Mt. 
Gretna,  Pennsylvania,  where  Harmonia  axyridis  have  aggregated  annually  since  first  dis- 
covery in  1993.  The  concrete  tower  is  20.1  m  (66  ft)  high  and  4.47  m  ( 15  ft)  in  diameter 
with  internal  beetle  aggregation  sites  consisting  primarily  of  IS)  m  of  ceiling/wall  inter- 
face at  each  of  four  levels.  The  west  tower  entrance  (shown)  faces  275  from  magnetic 
north.  This  entrance  level  provides  a  similar  area  that  is  generally  rejected  by  beetles.  A 
corresponding  enclosed  ladderway,  window  slits,  and  entrance  on  the  opposite  or  east  side 
(not  shown)  is  used  by  beetles  to  a  lesser  extent  than  the  west  side  because  of  the  orien- 
tation of  the  sun  on  mid-  to  late-afternoon  sunny  days  in  October  and  November  when  the 
beetles  take  flieht. 


26  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Data  on  light  intensity,  particularly  when  considering  that  no  or  very  few  bee- 
tles aggregated  at  the  naturally  illuminated  tower  entrance,  point  to  the  impor- 
tance of  diminished  light.  At  3:30  p.m.  on  March  26,  1998,  the  full  outside  sun- 
light measurement  was  36,000  lux  (hereafter  all  measurements  are  converted  to 
a  percentage  of  this  figure);  reflectance  on  the  outside  concrete  surface  was  36%; 
while  l/2  m  inside  the  entrance  the  light  intensity  was  down  to  4.2%  and  at  the 
possible  aggregation  niche  it  was  2.0%.  At  upper  levels  1  thru  3  the  mean  light 
intensity  Vi  m  from  the  window  slits  was  much  lower  (0.13%)  and  at  the  ceil- 
ing/wall interface  (beetle  aggregation  sites)  light  intensity  was  only  28  lux  or 
0.08%.  In  contrast  to  these  acceptable  aggregation  sites  (Levels  1-4);  the  en- 
trance level  was  devoid  of  beetles,  suggesting  that  the  difference  between  740 
lux  and  28  lux  made  the  difference,  since  the  physical  structure  was  similar  with 
the  exception  of  the  brighter  door-sized  entrance  (Figure  1 ).  Severely  diminished 
light  intensity  appears  to  act  as  a  behavioral  arrestant,  and  this  may  be  one  impor- 
tant factor  in  successful  beetle  aggregation. 

Table  1 .  Mean  Harmonia  axyridis  collected  in  the  southwest  side  of  the  observation 
tower  in  Clarence  Schock  Memorial  Park  at  Governor  Dick,  Mt.  Gretna,  Pennsylvania, 
during  the  winters  of  1996  through  1998  and  survival  of  beetles  at  upper  and  lower  two 
levels  pooled  during  November-February  2001.  Levels  refer  to  potential  beetle  aggrega- 
tion sites,  i.e.  2.9  m  of  ceiling/wall  interface  (See  Figure  1). 


Level 

Height  (m) 

3  yr.  total 

Mean 

SD 

2001  Survival: 

Total  No.          %  Alive 

4 

19.8 

3,017 

l,005.7a 

301.3 

796                57.4 

3 

15.8 

3.016 

l,005.3a 

154.1 

2 

11.7 

4,056 

1,352.  la 

180.5 

1.176                62.6 

1 

7.3 

4,927 

l,642.3a 

467.6 

Entrance 

2.2 

0 

Ob 

0 

Total/Mean  15,016  5.005.3  769.3  1,972  60.5 


1.  Based  on  the  Student-Newman-Keuls  test,  means  with  the  same  letter  are  not  significantly  differ- 
ent (P=  <  0.05). 


In  the  fall  of  1998, 1  discovered  that  all  internal  surfaces  of  the  tower  had  been 
painted  white.  White  paint  had  also  been  applied  to  the  outside  of  the  tower  up 
to  the  3.4  m  level.  This  seemed  to  somewhat  alter  the  general  behavior  of  beetles 
in  comparison  to  the  years  before  painting,  perhaps  through  differential  surface 
texture,  color,  or  contact  stimuli.  On  November  1,  2000,  I  found  many  beetles 
slowly  walking  on  concrete  surfaces  and  only  a  few  had  aggregated  in  corners. 


Vol.  114.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 27_ 

Some  small  clusters  were  present  on  the  external  surface  of  the  tower.  Another 
inspection  22  days  later  showed  beetles  rather  loosely  organized  in  clusters. 
Some  of  the  small  clusters  remained  on  the  external  surface  positioned  at  the 
concrete/white  paint  interface  on  the  tower's  southwest  exposure.  I  also  counted 
231  H.  axyridis  positioned  on  the  entrance  level,  just  inside  the  entrance  door 
(south  side  only)  and  I  estimated  at  least  a  5-fold  increase  on  Level  1. 1  assume 
that  colder  temperatures  soon  thereafter  forced  all  beetles  into  the  darker,  inter- 
nal recesses  of  the  tower  ladderways  but  no  visits  confirmed  this  movement. 

Based  on  collective  observations  at  this  tower  and  experiences  at  other  sites 
(i.e.  two  old  silos  in  Middletown,  Delaware,  and  the  Ironmasters  House,  Pine 
Grove  Furnace  State  Park,  near  Gettysburg,  Penn.,  on  October  18,  1994)  I  pro- 
pose the  following  behavioral  sequence:  H.  axyridis  beetles  annually  fly  on 
warm,  still,  fall  afternoons  and  then  alight  on  the  tower  surface,  crawl  over  the 
surface,  and  enter  the  slit  windows  to  the  internal  ladderway  81  cm  (32  inches) 
wide,  and  in  diminished  light  aggregate  at  the  ceiling- wall  interface  (Figure  1). 
At  first  the  beetles  cluster  loosely,  with  many  stragglers,  and  as  colder  days  occur 
beetles  progressively  cluster  together  in  tighter  aggregations.  In  addition,  some 
beetles  packed  tightly  into  the  hollow  ends  of  the  steel  ladder  rungs,  and  in  drain 
holes  (from  the  floor  above),  and  others  accumulated  on  the  tops  of  steel  ladders 
and  upright  wooden  guards  opposite  each  ladder.  In  all  locations,  beetles  re- 
mained nearly  motionless  or  moved  very  sluggishly.  Beetle  survival  was  then  de- 
pendent on  the  cumulative  exposure  to  winds  and  sub-freezing  temperatures. 

Winter  survival  of  the  beetles  appears  to  be  very  unpredictable.  During  the 
winter  of  1994,  the  majority  of  beetles  in  these  aggregations  apparently  died  in 
situ.  Probably  the  steel  and  concrete  structure  of  the  observation  tower  provided 
too  little  thermal  protection  for  overwintering  survival.  Since  I  removed  most 
beetles  yearly  beginning  in  the  fall  of  1995, 1  cannot  comment  further  on  survival 
in  those  winters,  with  the  exception  of  the  winter  of  1997-1998  (an  unusually 
mild  winter).  During  that  winter,  when  beetles  had  not  been  removed  the  previ- 
ous fall,  there  was  no  evidence  of  mass  mortality  in  March  1998.  On  February 
15,  2001,  after  an  unseasonably  cold  December,  I  collected  beetles  and  deter- 
mined that  overall  survival  was  60.5%  (Table  1).  The  following  November 
(2002),  beetles  had  aggregated  as  usual  but  the  overall  numbers  diminished  to 
approximately  1/10  that  of  the  winters  of  1995  and  1996  based  on  comparative 
photographs. 

The  observation  tower  continues  to  attract  H.  axyridis,  but  it  is  clear  that  it 
sometimes  fails  to  provide  sufficient  insulation  to  maximize  survival  during 
unusually  cold  winters.  One  can  only  imagine  that  in  the  cracks  and  crevices  of 
a  natural  rock  outcropping  (where  I  have  observed  naturally  occurring  aggrega- 
tions in  Hokkaido,  Japan),  aggregated  beetles  might  experience  warmer  subsur- 
face temperatures  (considerably  more  constant  and  never  so  severely  cold  as 
ambient  air  temperatures),  higher  moisture  levels,  and  perhaps  also  the  insulat- 
ing advantage  of  snow  cover.  Optimum  winter  survival  of  H.  axyridis  may  occur 


28  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


under  these  conditions.  In  conclusion,  the  Mt.  Gretna  observation  tower  has 
become  a  reliable  site  to  observe  and  collect  H .  axyridis  in  late  fall  even  though 
the  survival  of  all  aggregated  beetles  is  very  much  dependent  on  the  collective 
severity  of  ambient  winter  weather.  The  tower  also  makes  a  very  convenient  site 
for  the  general  public  to  hike  up  the  trails  in  late  fall,  enjoy  the  scenic  view,  and 
witness  the  annual  aggregation  of  these  invasive,  yet  remarkable  lady  beetles. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  the  trustees  of  the  Clarence  Schock  Memorial  Park  at  Governor  Dick  for  maintaining  the 
park  and  providing  continued  access  to  the  general  public.  Many  thanks  to  Susan  Earth  and  Philip 
Taylor  who  provided  technical  help.  Thanks  also  to  Christine  A.  Nalepa  (NC  Dept.  Agric.,  Raleigh), 
Wiliam  H.  Day  (USDA,  Newark.  DE),  and  W.  Louis  Tedders,  Jr.  (Perry,  GA)  who  provided  helpful 
comments  on  earlier  drafts  and  two  anonymous  reviewers  who  offered  additional  suggestions. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Brown,  M.  W.  and  S.  S.  Miller.  1998.  Coccinellidae  (Coleoptera)  in  apple  orchards  of  eastern  West 
Virginia  and  the  impact  of  invasion  by  Harmonia  a.\\ridis.  Entomological  News  109:  136-142. 

Chapin,  J.  B.  and  V.  A.  Brou.  1991 .  Harmonia  axyridis  (Pallas),  the  third  species  of  the  genus  to 
be  found  in  the  U.S.  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae).  Proceedings  of  Entomological  Society  of  Wash- 
ington 93:630-635. 

De  Quattro,  J.   1995.  Gotcha.  Tiny  lady  beetles  have  big  biocontrol  potential.  Agricultural  Research 

43(3):  4-8. 

Kidd,  K.  A.,  C.  A.  Nalepa,  E.  R.  Day  and  M.  G.  Waldvogel.  1995.  Distribution  of  Harmonia 
axyridis  (Pallas)  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae)  in  North  Carolina  and  Virginia.  Proceedings  of 
Entomological  Society  of  Washington  97:729-731 . 

Nalepa,  C.  A.,  K.  A.  Kidd  and  K.  R.  Ahlstrom.  1996.  Biology  of  Harmonia  axyridis  (Coleoptera: 
Coccinellidae)  in  winter  aggregations.  Annals  of  Entomological  Society  of  America  89:681-685. 

Nalepa,  C.  A.,  K.  A.  Kidd  and  D.  I.  Hopkins.  2000.  The  multicolored  Asian  lady  beetle 
(Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae):  Orientation  to  aggregation  sites.  Journal  Entomological  Science 
35:150-157. 

Tedders,  W.  L.  and  P.  W.  Schaefer.  1 994.  Release  and  establishment  of  Harmonia  axyridis  (Coleo- 
ptera: Coccinellidae)  in  the  Southeastern  United  States.  Entomological  News  105(4):228-243. 

Web  Address:    http://www.mbcomp.com/litzonlebanon/governor.htm 


Vol.  1  14.  No.  I  .  January  &  February  2003 


REVIEW  OF  THE  MIDDLE  AMERICAN  LACE  BUG 

GENUS  MACROTINGIS  (HETEROPTERA:  TINGIDAE), 

WITH  A  KEY  AND  A  NEW  SPECIES  FROM  MEXICO1 

Richard  C.  Froeschner2 

ABSTRACT:  The  genus  Macmtingis  was  described  by  Champion  (1897:22)  for  two  species.  Later 
Drake  added  another  species  and  a  "variety"  for  one  of  Champion's  species;  that  variety  is  herein  ele- 
vated to  full  species  status.  The  range  of  Macrotingis,  previously  known  from  Guatemala  south  into 
Panama,  is  extended  a  short  distance  northward  into  southern  Mexico  with  the  present  description  of 
the  new  species  M.  schaffneri.  A  key  separates  the  five  included  taxa. 

KEYWORDS:  Macrotingis,  Heteroptera,  Tingidae,  Middle  America,  Mexico. 

Genus  Macrotingis  Champion 
Figure  1 

Macrotingis  Champion   1897:22.  Type  species:  Macrotingis  biseriata  Champion,  designated  by 
Drake  and  Poor  1936:387. 

Diagnosis.  This  genus  of  Tingidae  is  readily  recognized  by  the  combination 
of  its  first  antennal  segment  being  much  longer  than  the  width  of  the  head  across 
both  eyes  coupled  with  the  presence  of  a  small,  elevated,  and  inflated  cyst  on  the 
median  carina  extending  from  the  anterior  slope  of  the  pronotum  to  the  anterior 
margin  of  the  collar. 

List  of  Macrotingis  species 

Macrotingis  biseriata  Champion  1897:22,  REVISED  STATUS 

Macrotingis  biseriata  Champion  1897:22.  Costa  Rica.  Honduras.  Panama. 

Macrotingis  biseriata  biseriata.-  Drake  1928:4. 
Macrotingis  novicis  Drake,  NEW  STATUS 

Macrotingis  biseriata  novicis  Drake  1928:4.  Honduras. 
Macrotingis  schaffneri,  NEW  SPECIES.  Mexico. 
Macrotingis  uniseriata  Champion  1897:22.  Guatemala. 
Macrotingis  ~eteki  Drake  1950:299.  Panama. 

Key  to  species  of  Macrotingis 

1  .  Pronotal  disc  with  lateral  carinae  extending  forward  over  interhumeral  con- 
vexity to  calli.  Occipital  spines  obliquely  elevated,  very  long,  length  of  one 
of  them  greater  than  interocular  width.  Length  4.1  mm  .......  M.  zetcki  Drake 


1  Received  on  September  29,  2001 .  Accepted  on  December  14.  2003. 

'  Department  of  Entomology.  MRC-0105.  United  States  National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Wash- 
ington, D.C.  20013-7012.  Dr.  Froeschner  died  on  May  2,2002.  Reprints  may  be  requested  I'romT.J. 
Henry,  Systematic  Entomology,  Laboratory.  ARS.  USDA.  P.O.  Box  37012,  National  Museum  of 
Natural  History.  MRC-0168  Smithsonian  Institution.  Washington.  DC  20013-7012.  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
thenryC"  sel.barc.usda.gov. 

Mailed  on  April  9, 2004 


30 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


EfiF 


Fig.  1 .  Macrotingis  biseriata,  natural  size  4.3  mm. 


Pronotal  disc  with  lateral  carinae,  when  present,  restricted  to  area  posterior 
to  crest  of  interhumeral  convexity.  Occipital  spines,  when  present,  much 
shorter  and  decurved  onto  surface  of  head..  ..2 


2.     Lateral  carinae  of  pronotal  disc  present  posterior  to  interhumeral  convexity 

..3 


Vol.  114.  No.  I  .  January  &  Februan  21)03 


Lateral  carinae  of  pronotal  discabsent.  Length  4.7mm  ................................... 

.....................................................................  M.  schaffiieri,  NEW  SPECIES 

3.  Costal  area  with  a  single  row  of  areolae.  Length  4.7  mm  ............................. 

.................................................................................  M.  uniseriata  Champion 

Costal  area  with  a  partial  to  complete  second  row  of  areolae  ....................  4 

4.  Costal  area  with  two  rows  of  areolae  reaching  base  of  costal  area.  Length 
4.2-4.3  mm  ................................................................  M.  biseriata  Champion 

Costal  area  uniseriate  basally.  Length  4.6-4.9  mm  ............  M.  novicis  Drake 

Macrotingis  schaffneri,  NEW  SPECIES 

Diagnosis.  This  species  differs  from  all  other  members  of  the  genus  Macrot- 
ingis by  lacking  lateral  carinae  on  pronotal  disc. 

Description.  Male:  Length  4.7  mm.  Head  with  a  single  dorsal  spine,  the  supraclvpeal.  which  is 
very  long,  vertically  recurved,  its  apex  higher  than  crest  of  anterior  pronotal  cyst:  dorsal  surface  con- 
vex, polished.  Rostrum  slightly  passing  midlength  of  mesosternum.  Bucculae  widened  posteriorly. 
there  slightly  projecting  under  apex  of  prosternum;  anteriorly  projecting  and  meeting  across  clypcux. 

Pronotum.  Disc  with  numerous,  close-set,  distinct  punctures;  no  discal  lateral  carinae:  anterior 
cyst  of  median  carina  inflated,  as  high  as  median  carina  over  interhumeral  convexity,  cyst  xlightK 
projecting  above  base  of  head,  posteriorly  terminated  on  anterior  slope  of  interhumeral  con\e\n>. 
median  carina  elsewhere  low,  uniseriate.  Paranotum  slightly  wider  than  an  eye,  weakly  oblique,  outer 
row  of  cells  much  larger  than  inner  row. 

Hemelytra.  Elongate,  costal  margins  almost  parallel.  Costal  area  uniseriate  at  base  and  at  apical 
fourth,  elsewhere  with  two  very  irregular  rows  of  areolae.  Discoidal  area  confined  to  basal  third  of 
hemelytron,  with  six  areolae  across  widest  part.  Subcostal  area  regularly  biseriate  along  slightly  more 
than  basal  half  of  discoidal  area,  thence  triseriate  to  well  beyond  discoidal  area  where  it  narrows  to 
a  uniseriate  series.  Hypocosta  narrow,  uniseriate. 

Sternal  laminae.  Distinct:  prosternal  laminae  straight,  weakly  converging  posteriorly,  separated 
by  a  space  equal  to  space  between  anterior  coxae:  metasternal  laminae  strongly  convexly  cur\ed. 
more  widely  separated  than  mesosternal  laminae. 

Peritreme.  Not  differentiated. 

Abdomen.  Impunctate. 

Etymology.  This  species  is  dedicated  to  Dr.  Joseph  C.  Schaffner,  leader  of  the 
field  parties  that  collected  all  except  two  specimens  of  the  types  series,  including 
the  holotype,  and  for  his  contributions  to  our  knowledge  of  the  Heteroptera 
through  publications  and  field  work. 

Type  specimens:  Holotype  Cf:  Mexico,  2.1  mi.  n\v.  Totolapan.  Jul\  11-17. 
1981  ,  Bogar,  Schaffner,  Friedlander.  Deposited  in  Instituto  de  Biologi'a,  Univer- 
sidad  Nacional  Autonoma  de  Mexico,  Mexico,  D.  F.  (UNAM).  .  Paratypes: 
MEXICO:  3  Cf,  7  99-  Chiapas.  5  mi.  north  Nuevo  Tenochtitlan,  3000'.  August 
7,  1990,  J.  C.  Schaffner  (Texas  A  &  M  University,  Collection  Station  [T.\M|:  1 
Cf.  1  9,  Chiapas.  27  km.  W.Cintalapa,  August  30,  1991  ,  R.  W.  Jones  (TAM):  21 
Cfcf,  19  99,  same  data  as  for  holotype  (TAM,  UNAM.  and  |U.S.|  National 
Museum  of  Natural  History.  Washington.  DC  |USNM)):  2  Cfcf.  Oaxaca:  2.7  mi. 
nw.  El  Cameron.  July  21-22,  1974,  Clark.  Murray.  Ashe.  Schaffner  (TAM):  1. 


32  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Oaxaca,  27  mi.  southwest  Salina  Cruz,  July  14,  1987,  Kovark,  Schaffner  (TAM); 
2  9<  Oaxaca,  10  mi.  e.  Totalapan,  Elev.  4,000  ft.,  July  20,  1987,  Kovarik,  Schaff- 
ner (TAM);  2  Cftf ,  1 9  Oaxaca,  12.4  mi.  w.  Tehuantepec,  August  4,  1980,  Schaff- 
ner, Weaver,  Friedlander  (TAM);  6  Cfcf,  1 9-  Oaxaca,  2  mi.  n.Totolapan,  July  17, 
1973,  Mastro  &  Schaffner  (TAM,  USNM);  ICf  Oaxaca,  10  mi.  E.  Totolapan, 
4000  ft.,  VII-20-1987,  P.  Kovarik,  and  J.  Schaffner  (TAM). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  Elsie  Herbold  Froeschner  for  the  excellent  figure  of  Macrotingis  biseriata,  the  type 
species  of  the  genus,  and  Joseph  C.  Schaffner,  Texas  A  &  M  University,  College  Station  for  lending 
the  types  series  of  M.  schaffneri .  I  also  acknowledge  the  careful  manuscript  reviews  by  Thomas  J. 
Henry,  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  U.S.  Department  Agriculture.  United  States  National 
Museum,  Washington.  D.C.  and  Paul  J.  Spangler.  Department  of  Entomology,  United  States  National 
Museum,  Washington,  D.C. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Champion,  G.  C.  1897.  Rhynchota.  Tingitidae  //;,  Godman  and  Salvin,  Biologia  Centrali-Ameri- 
cana2:l-32. 

Drake,  C.  J.  1928.  Some  Tingitidae  (Heteroptera)  from  Honduras.  Occasional  Papers  Museum  of 
Zoology.  University  of  Michigan  190:1-5. 

Drake,  C.  J.   1 950.  A  new  tingid  from  the  Canal  Zone.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
Washington  52:299-300. 

Drake,  C.  J.  and  M.  E.  Poor.   1936.  The  genera  and  genotypes  of  Tingitoidea  of  the  Western 
Hemisphere.  Iowa  State  Journal  of  Science  10:381-380. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 33_ 

A  NEW  NEARCTIC  PARACLOEODES 
(EPHEMEROPTERA:  BAETIDAE)1 

W.  P.  McCallerty-  and  David  R.  Lenat1 

ABSTRACT:  Paracloeodes fleeki,  new  species,  is  described  from  larvae  taken  from  sand  substrates 
of  medium  sized  streams  in  the  southern  outer  Piedmont  ecoregion  of  North  Carolina.  The  new 
species  differs  from  the  closely  related  and  parapatric  P.  minutux  in  having  a  medial  lobe  of  the  labi- 
al palp  that  is  less  rounded,  being  both  distally  non  protuberant  from  its  base  and  distomedially  more 
angulate.  Relatively  larger  gills  are  also  diagnostic  of  the  new  species;  however,  to  a  large  degree,  the 
color  pattern  displayed  by  the  new  species  is  encompassed  by  the  extensive  pattern  variability  found 
in  the  ubiquitous  and  widespread  P.  minutux. 

KEY  WORDS:  Paracloeodes,  Ephemeroptera,  Baetidae,  mayflies.  North  Carolina. 

The  genus  Paracloeodes  Day  was  originally  established  by  Day  (1955)  for 
what  are  now  known  as  the  widespread  North  and  Central  American  species  P. 
minntiis  (Daggy)  (see  McCafferty  and  Waltz  1990)  and  the  Puerto  Rican  species 
P.  portoricensis  (Traver).  No  other  species  were  known  of  this  Western  Hemi- 
sphere genus  until  one  species  was  described  from  Cuba  by  Kluge  (1991 );  four 
species  were  discovered  from  Argentina,  Brazil,  and  Paraguay  by  Lugo-Ortiz 
and  McCafferty  (1996);  and  one  other  was  described  from  Mexico  by  Randolph 
and  McCafferty  (2000).  Because  the  latter  species,  P.  lugoi  Randolph  and 
McCafferty,  is  known  only  from  far  southern  Neotropical  Mexico.  P.  minutus  has 
remained  the  only  species  known  to  occur  in  the  Nearctic  region.  Paracloeodes 
has  been  considered  an  austral  genus  of  Neotropical  origin  (e.g.,  McCafferty 
1998),  and  the  best  taxonomic  treatment  of  the  genus  was  given  by  Lugo-Ortiz 
and  McCafferty  (1996). 

Certain  samples  of  Paracloeodes  taken  in  1989  and  1993  from  small  streams 
in  the  Piedmont  of  North  Carolina  represent  a  second  and  more  geographically 
restricted  Nearctic  species  of  Paracloeodes.  The  description  of  this  new  species 
is  given  herein.  The  species  is  named  after  Eric  Fleek,  a  member  of  the  North 
Carolina  Division  of  Water  Quality  research  team  studying  benthic  macroinver- 
tebrate  fauna  of  North  Carolina  and  contributing  to  our  growing  knowledge  of 
aquatic  insect  biodiversity  and  water  quality  in  the  Southeast.  All  types  and  other 
material  examined  reside  in  the  Purdue  Entomological  Research  Collection,  Pur- 
due University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana. 

Paracloeodes  fleeki,  NEW  SPECIES 

Larva.  Mature  body  length:  3.2-3.4mm.  Mature  gill  4  length:  0.7()-0.75mm.  Mature  caudal  fila- 
ments length:  1 .4-1 .5mm.  Head:  Coloration  light  cream  with  light  brown  flecking.  Interantennal  keel 
present.  Antennae  not  marked.  Labrum  subquadrate  with  branched  setae  along  distal  margin  and  dor- 
sally  with  one  to  three  long  subdistal  setae  submedially.  Planate  mandible  with  weakly  feathered 


1  Received  on  April  9.  2003:  Accepted  December  1 1 .  2003. 

'Department    of    Entomology.   Purdue    University.  West   Lafayette.   IN   47907,   U.S.A.   E-mail: 

pat_mccafferty  <&  ent  m  .purdue  .edu . 
'North  Carolina  Division  of  Water  Qualit).  Biological  Assessment  I'nil.  4401   Recdv   Creek  Rd.. 

Raleigh.  NC  27607,  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


34  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


prostheca  (feathering  often  not  apparent)  and  only  shallow  depression  at  base  of  mola.  Angulate 
mandible  with  molar  triangle  nearly  perpendicular  to  distal  margin  of  mandible.  Second  segment  of 
labial  palpi  (Fig.  I )  with  medial  lobe  nearly  straight  distally,  not  protuberant  distally  from  base,  and 
more  angulate  than  rounded  distomedially,  and  with  row  of  hairlike  setae  on  dorsal  surface  poorly 
developed.  Thorax:  Nota  generally  speckled  with  light  brown.  Pronotum  usually  with  medial  pair  of 
short,  longitudinal  brown  bars  or  spots.  Tibiae  of  mid-  and  hindlegs  with  9- 1 1  marginal  spines.  Claws 
relatively  slender,  with  basal  rows  of  minute  denticles.  Hindwingpads  absent.  Abdomen:  Dorsal  and 
ventral  patterning  in  different  shades  of  brown  somewhat  variable.  In  well-marked  individuals,  ter- 
gum  1  with  anteromedial  longitudinal  bar;  tergum  2  darkest  with  medial  and  sublateral  markings  near 
anterior  margin,  and  much  of  central  area  pigmented  with  brown  but  less  so  in  exact  center  or  medio- 
posteriorly;  tergum  3  somewhat  pigmented  with  medial  and  submedial  markings  near  anterior  mar- 
gin and  diffuse  light  brown  laterally;  tergum  4  pale  except  for  small  lateral  and  submedial  clouds 
(each  submedial  cloud  often  with  smaller  posterolateral  adjacent  cloud);  tergum  5  light  with  small 
submedial  clouds  as  in  tergum  4  and  with  small  medial  light  mark  near  anterior  margin;  tergum  6  well 
pigmented  with  dark  submedial  markings  and  brown  over  much  of  the  surface  except  often  for  small 
medioposterior  area;  tergum  7  light  with  medial  and  submedial  clouds;  tergum  8  generally  similar  to 
7  or  unmarked;  tergum  9  well  pigmented  with  only  small  submedial  and  lateral  areas  at  anterior  mar- 
gin not  pigmented;  tergum  10  with  medial  dot  or  narrow  longitudinal  bar  near  anterior  margin.  In 
lighter  individuals,  only  tergum  2  with  considerable  diffuse  pigmentation  and  light  paired  markings 
sometimes  variously  present  on  terga  3-7  and  9  (with  terga  1 ,8  and  10  unmarked).  In  other  individu- 
als, tergum  1  with  medial  pigmented  v-shaped  area  at  anterior  margin;  tergum  2  with  diffuse  shading 
medially;  tergum  3  with  transverse  marking  anteriorly  in  middle  two-thirds,  and  similar  but  less 
developed  in  tergum  4;  terga  5-7  with  small  marks  medially  near  anterior  margin;  tergum  8  un- 
marked; tergum  9  washed  with  light  diffuse  brown;  and  tergum  10  unmarked.  Venter  with  distinct 
dark  spot  sublaterally  on  either  side  of  sterna  2-7;  some  individuals  with  thin  transverse  pencil  lines 
apparent  at  intersegmental  margins  of  certain  sterna;  thicker  transverse  bars  and/or  lateral  spots  at 
pleural  fold  not  present  in  known  material. 

Adult.  Unknown. 

Type  material.  HOLOTYPE:  larva,  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Guilford  Co,  South  Buffalo  Cr  at  SR 
2821 ,  VII-1993,  D.  Lenat  and  T.  McPherson.  PARATYPES:  four  larvae,  including  three  slides,  same 
data  as  holotype;  one  larva,  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Gaston  Co,  unnamed  tributary  of  Crowders  Cr  at 
SR  2416,  IX-1989,  D.  Penrose  and  D.  Lenat. 

Additional  material  examined.  Paracloeodes  fleeki:  NORTH  CAROLINA,  Gaston  Co.  un- 
named tributary  of  Crowders  Cr  at  SR  2416,  IX-1989,  D.  Penrose  and  D.  Lenat  (larva);  Guilford  Co, 
Richland  Cr  at  SR  1945,  VII-1993,  D.  Lenat  and  D.  McPherson  (early  instar  larvae);  same  data  as 
holotype  (larva).  P.  lugoi:  MEXICO,  Guerrero.  Rio  Balsas,  between  Iguala  &  Chilaparicingo  off 
Hwy  95,  1800',  XI- 16- 1968,  RK  Allen  (larvae,  slide-mounted).  P.  miniitu.s:  ARIZONA:  Graham  Co, 
Gila  R  at  rd  to  San  Jose,  VII-07-1969  (adults);  KANSAS,  Douglas  Co,  Mud  Cr,  Sec  7  T125,  Rt  20 
E,  KAW  Valley  Fish  Farm,  V- 20- 1980,  P  Liechti  (larvae,  slide-mounted);  NEBRASKA:  Buffalo  Co, 
Platte  R  at  Kearny,  VIII- 12-1 982,  AV  Provonsha  (larvae,  slide-mounted);  NORTH  CAROLINA:  Ala- 
mance  Co,  Alamance  Cr,  Haw  R,  VII-1998;  Guilford  Co,  South  Buffalo  Cr,  VII-1993;  Mecklenberg 
Co,  McAlpine  Cr,  Little  Sugar  Cr,  VIII- 1997  (all  larvae  +  slide-mounted  parts);  OHIO,  Clermont  Co, 
E  Frk  Miami  R,  P&G-ESF  02082798LTA,  VIII-27-1998,  J  Bowling  (adults);  QUEBEC,  Ottawa  R, 
nr  Gatineau  between  W  end  Kettle  Island  &  N  shore,  75/40/27.9W  45/28/05.9N,  IX-27-2002  (larva, 
slide-mounted);  WYOMING:  Sweetwater  Co,  Blacks  Fork  R  at  1-80,  W  Green  River,  VIII-02-1993, 
AV  Provonsha  (larvae,  slide-mounted).  Additional  larval  populations  of  P.  minntits  were  examined 
from  Indiana,  Iowa,  Nebraska,  New  York,  Querataro  (Mexico),  and  Texas. 

Discussion.  Paracloeodes  fleeki  larvae  are  similar  in  several  respects  to  those 
of  P.  minutus.  For  example,  in  addition  to  body  size  being  similar,  we  did  not  find 
significant  differences  in  the  head  capsule,  antennae,  labrum,  mandibles,  hypo- 
pharynx,  maxillae,  or  legs,  and  thus  these  structures  are  not  extensively  treated 
in  the  formal  description  of  P.  fleeki,  above.  Also,  whereas  based  on  the  materi- 
al available  of  the  new  species,  the  ventral  abdominal  patterns  are  limited  and 
relatively  consistent,  the  examination  of  a  large  number  of  individuals  of  P.  niin- 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


35 


utus  revealed  that  those  patterns  were  also  associated  with  some  individuals  of 
P.  minutus.  In  general,  the  dorsal  abdominal  patterns  of  the  two  species  are  vari- 
ations on  a  similar  theme  of  having  pigmentation  emphasized  in  terga  2,  3,6,  and 
9,  although  in  both  species  there  are  lighter  individuals,  and  very  early  instars  of 
P.  minutus  may  show  no  markings.  Nevertheless,  we  have  not  seen  larvae  off. 
fleeki  that  exhibit  lateral  edge  spots  at  the  pleural  fold  of  many  of  the  abdominal 
segments,  which  are  often  evident  in  both  a  dorsal  and  ventral  view  of  P.  minu- 
tus, nor  have  we  seen  any  P.  fleeki  larvae  that  have  thick  transverse  bars  at  the 
intersegmental  margins  of  sterna  (especially  sterna  6-8).  Some  individuals  of 
both  species,  however,  may  demonstrate  thin  intersegmental  lines  associated 
with  a  few  or  most  of  the  sterna. 

The  fact  that  larvae  of  Pseudocentroptiloides  Jacob,  some  Procloeon  Bengts- 
son  such  as  P.  viridoculare  (Berner),  and  some  other  long-clawed  baetids  will 
demonstrate  markings  very  similar  to  those  described  for  Paracloeodes  above 
suggests  that  habitat  may  have  a  strong  influence  on  the  similar  and  probably 
adaptive  color  patterns  that  are  being  expressed.  All  of  the  above  taxa  include 
very  small  larvae  that  are  associated  with  sand-silt  substrates  in  running  water. 

The  most  significant  structural  difference  between  P.  fleeki  and  P.  minutus 
involves  the  shape  and  development  of  the  medial  lobe  of  segment  2  of  the  labi- 
al palps.  This  mouthpart  has  proven  useful  in  discriminating  between  all  known 
species  of  Paracloeodes  (see  above).  Figures  1  and  2  are  provided  so  that  a  com- 
parison can  be  made  between  the  shapes  of  this  structure  in  P.  fleeki  and  P.  min- 
utus. In  general,  the  lobe  in  P.  minutus  is  relatively  rounded  or  protruding  (Fig. 
2),  and  the  lobe  in  P.  fleeki  is  relatively  angulate  and  non  protruding.  It  should  be 
noted  that  these  shapes  can  be  misinterpreted  if  only  a  dissecting  microscope  is 
used  for  examination.  Therefore,  slide  mounts  and  compound  microscopy  are 


Figs.  1  -2.  Paracloeodes  labial  palp.   1.  P.  fleeki.  2.  P.  minutus. 


36  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


highly  recommended.  It  should  also  be  noted  that  palps  of  early  instar  larvae  are 
not  definitive. 

When  comparing  middle  to  late  instar  larvae,  those  of  P .fleeki  have  larger  gills 
than  those  of  P.  miniitus  (e.g.,  a  0.70mm  or  larger  gill  4  vs.  a  0.60mm  or  smaller 
gill  4).  This  was  found  consistently  in  all  North  Carolina  material  examined  (see 
above).  Although  this  is  usually  only  a  15-20%  difference  in  length,  it  is  quite 
apparent  when  one  has  worked  with  both  species.  An  important  caveat  is  that 
smaller  (earlier  instar)  individuals,  including  those  of  P.  minutiis,  will  often 
appear  to  have  disproportionately  longer  gills.  Thus,  actual  gill  size  differences 
in  immature  larvae  are  not  easily  interpreted  or  are  non  existent.  Among  larvae 
from  North  Carolina,  the  ratio  of  length  to  width  of  gill  7  was  found  always  to 
be  greater  than  2.5  (e.g.,  2.72)  in  P.  fleeki,  whereas  it  was  always  lower  that  2.5 
(e.g.,  2.15)  in  P.  minutiis.  However,  we  have  seen  larvae  off.  minutiis  from  Ne- 
braska (see  other  material  examined,  above)  with  a  very  narrow-elongate  gill  7 
with  a  comparative  ratio  of  3.60.  The  narrowness  of  the  gills  associated  with  the 
latter  can  give  a  deceptive  impression  of  long  gills.  Actual  length  measurements 
indicate  that  is  not  the  case,  and  in  this  latter  example  from  Nebraska,  the  actual 
length  of  gill  7  was  only  0.50mm  (compared  to  a  typical  0.68mm  gill  7  length 
for  P.  fleeki). 

The  new  species  was  taken  from  sand  substrates  in  three  medium  sized 
streams  (8. 0-1 3. Om  wide)  that  are  found  in  the  southern  outer  Piedmont  ecore- 
gion  of  North  Carolina.  This  area  is  located  between  the  rocky  stream  system  of 
the  Slate  Belt  and  the  Foothills  area  of  the  Mountains.  Two  of  the  three  streams 
had  primarily  sand  substrates  at  the  sites  where  the  new  species  was  collected; 
and  one  had  pockets  of  sand  substrate  among  predominantly  mixed  substrate. 
P aracloeodes  fleeki  does  not  appear  to  be  limited  by  water  quality  because  col- 
lecting sites  registered  only  poor  to  fair  water  quality  ratings. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  L.  Sun  and  A.  V.  Provonsha  (West  Lafayette,  IN)  for  technical  assistance,  and 
D.  Zaranko  (Guelph,  ON)  for  providing  material.  The  research  was  supported  in  part  by  NSF  grant 
DEB-9901577  and  the  North  Carolina  Division  of  Water  Quality. 

LITERATURE  CITED 
Day,  W.  C.   1955.  New  genera  of  mayflies  from  California.  Pan-Pacific  Entomologist  31:  121-137. 

Kluge,  N.  1991.  Cuban  mayflies  of  the  family  Baetidae  (Ephemeroptera)  1.  Genera  Callibaetis, 
Cloeodes  and  Paracloeodes.  Zoologicheskiy  Zhurnal  12:128-135.  [in  Russian]. 

Lugo-Ortiz,  C.  R  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1996.  The  genus  Paracloeodes  (Insecta:  Ephemeroptera: 
Baetidae)  and  its  presence  in  South  America.  Annales  de  Limnologie  32:161-169. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1998.  Ephemeroptera  and  the  great  American  interchange.  Journal  of  the  North 
American  Benthological  Society  17:  1-20. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  and  R.  D.  Waltz.  1990.  Revisionary  synopsis  of  the  Baetidae  (Ephemeroptera) 
of  North  and  Middle  America.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  1 16:  769- 
799. 

Randolf,  R.P.  and  W.P.  McCafferty.  2000.  A  new  species  of  Parut -lot-odes  (Ephemeroptera:  Bae- 
tidae) from  Mexico.  Entomological  News  1 1 1:133-136. 


Vol.  114.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  20(13 37_ 

ABLEPTEMETES:  A  NEW  GENUS  OF  TRICORYTHODI- 

NAE  (EPHEMEROPTERA:  LEPTOHYPHIDAE) 

FROM  MEXICO  AND  CENTRAL  AMERICA1 

N.  A.  Wiersema:  and  W.  P.  McCafferty3 

ABSTRACT:  Ableptemetes,  n.  gen.,  is  described  for  the  Mexican  and  Central  American  species  A. 
dicinctus,  n.  comb.,  and  A.  melanobranchus,  n.  comb.,  which  were  previously  considered  in  either 
Lcpiahyphes  or  more  recently  Tricorythopsis.  The  new  genus  is  known  only  from  larvae  and  can  be 
distinguished  among  North  and  Central  American  genera  of  the  subfamily  Tricorythodinae.  by  the 
presence  of  minute  posteromarginal  spines  on  abdominal  terga  1-10  along  with  numerous  other  char- 
acteristics such  as  a  double  row  of  submarginal  claw  denticles.  Tricorythopsis  appears  to  be  confined 
to  South  America.  The  recent  keys  to  the  subfamilies  and  revised  genera  of  North  and  Central 
American  Leptohyphidae  as  well  as  the  larval  characterization  of  the  subfamily  Tricorythodinae  are 
slightly  modified  to  accommodate  the  new  genus  and  new  morphological  data  associated  with  it. 

KEY  WORDS:  Ableptemetes,  Ephemeroptera,  Leptohyhiidae,  Tricorythodinae.  Mexico,  Central 
America. 

Wiersema  and  McCafferty  (2000)  in  their  revision  of  the  North  and  Central 
American  genera  of  the  mayfly  family  Leptohyphidae  transferred  the  species 
originally  described  as  Leptohyphes  dicinctus  Allen  and  Brusca  and  L.  melano- 
branchus Allen  and  Brusca  to  the  genus  Tricorythopsis  Traver.  These  species  are 
known  only  as  larvae  (Allen  and  Brusca  1973).  Their  recombination  had  been 
based  on  the  fact  that  they  clearly  did  not  belong  to  Leptohyphes  Eaton,  along 
with  their  apparent  similarity  with  the  first  description  of  a  larval  exuviae  asso- 
ciated with  an  adult  Tricorythopsis  from  South  America  by  Molineri  (1999).  This 
latter  larval  representative,  although  initially  ascribed  to  T.fictilis  Molineri,  has 
proven  to  be  the  type  of  the  genus,  T.  artigas  Traver.  Wiersema  and  McCafferty 
(2000)  cautioned  that  the  placement  of  the  Allen  and  Brusca  species  in 
Tricorythopsis  was  contingent  on  verification  from  the  discovery  of  their  adults, 
or  at  least  a  study  of  mature  larval  specimens  that  may  or  may  not  confirm  the 
descriptions  of  Allen  and  Brusca  (1973)  and  provide  additional  descriptive  data 
such  as  was  deemed  important  in  the  revisionary  work  of  Wiersema  and 
McCafferty  (2000). 

Recently,  a  more  comprehensive  review  of  Tricorythopsis  in  South  America 
has  become  available  (Molineri  200 la).  Also  recently,  a  large  series  of  mature 
larvae  of  T.  dicinctus  has  been  attained  from  Belize.  The  study  of  these  larvae  as 
well  as  the  types  of  both  species  in  question  has  revealed  numerous  characters 
that  were  not  treated  in  the  original  descriptions  and  in  some  instances  not  even 
apparent  in  the  poorly  preserved  type  material.  The  newly  available  data  make  it 
obvious  that  the  Allen  and  Brusca  species  in  question  should  be  removed  from 
Tricorvthopsis  sensu  stricto  and  placed  in  the  newly  described  genus  of  the  sub- 
family Tricorythodinae  that  follows. 


1  Received  on  May  30,  2002.  Accepted  November  28.  2003. 

'4807  MFG,  Inc. .Consulting  Scientists  and  Engineers.  Spicewood  Springs  Rd.,  Building  IV.  Austin. 
TX  78759.  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Nick.Wicrsema@mfgenv.com. 

'Department    of   Entomology.   Purdue    University.  West    Lafayette,   IN  47907,   U.S.A.   E-mail: 
pat_mccafferty(a  entm.purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


38 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Ableptemetes,  NEW  GENUS 

Larva.  Body  relatively  elongate,  known  species  ranging  in  mature  length  from  2.8  to  3.5  mm. 
Head  (Fig.  1  Allen  &  Brusca  1973)  with  well-developed  frontal  shelf,  genal  projections  and  fronto- 
clypeal  projection  (all  fringed  with  stout  setae);  vertex  without  tubercles.  Compound  eyes  not  sexu- 
ally dimorphic.  Labrum  (Fig.  1 )  width  nearly  one  and  one-half  times  length.  Mandibles  (Figs.  2  &  3) 
with  reduced  molae.  Galealaciniae  (Fig.  4)  with  apical  denticles  pointed  in  same  axis  as  that  of 
galealaciniae  (crown  poorly  developed).  Hypopharynx  with  lingua  slightly  emarginate;  superlinguae 
broadly  rounded.  Labium  (Fig.  5)  with  short,  defined  glossae;  submentum  with  lateral  aspect  round- 
ed basally  and  constricted  distally,  with  basal  three-fourths  of  margin  sparsely  fringed  with  stout, 
medium-length  setae,  and  distal  one-fourth  essentially  bare.  Thoracic  nota  without  tubercles,  fringed 
with  setae.  Hindwingpads  absent  in  both  sexes.  Legs  with  anterior  and  posterior  margins  with  both 
long  and  short,  stout,  bristlelike  setae.  Forefemora  with  short  and  broad,  dorsally  with  transverse  row 


Figures  1-7.  Ableptemetes  dicinctus,  n.  comb.,   1.  Labrum.  2.  Left  mandible.  3.  Right 
mandible.  4.  Maxillae.  5.  Labium.  6.  Claw.  7.  Gill  two  (ventral  view). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 39 


of  stout,  bristlelike  setae;  hindfemora  length  subequal  to  that  of  hindtibiae  and  hindtarsi  combined. 
Claws  (Fig.  6)  with  basal  denticles,  and  with  two  rows  of  submarginal,  subapical  denticles,  some- 
times reduced  to  one  or  two  denticles  on  one  side.  Abdomen  more  or  less  triangular  in  cross-section, 
with  peaked  dorsum;  terga  1-10  with  long,  fine,  marginal  setae  laterally  and  posterolaterally  and  with 
short,  apically  truncate  or  rounded,  posteromarginal  spines;  middle  terga  each  with  medioposterior 
protuberance  fringed  with  stout  setae.  Gills  present  on  abdominal  segments  2-6;  operculate  gills  (Fig. 
7)  large,  subtriangulate  with  rounded  borders,  without  submedial  or  subdistal,  unsclerotized  bands; 
ventral  gill  lamellae  without  fringes  or  flaps,  length  of  inner  lamellae  approximately  one-half  that  of 
out  outer  lamellae.  Caudal  filaments  with  whorls  of  setae  at  each  segmental  joining. 

Adult.  Unknown. 

Type  species.  Leptohyphes  dicinctus  Allen  and  Brusca. 

Species  included.  Ableptemetes  dicinctus  (Allen  and  Brusca),  NEW  COMBINATION;  Ablepte- 
metes  melanobranthus  (Allen  and  Brusca).  NEW  COMBINATION. 

Etymology.  From  the  Greek  noun  "ableptema"  (mistake[n])  and  the  mascu- 
line suffix  "etes"  (one  who  [was]). 

Distribution.  Mexico  and  Central  America. 


DISCUSSION 

The  following  combination  of  characteristics  will  serve  to  distinguish  Ablep- 
temetes larvae  from  known  larvae  of  other  defined  genera  of  Leptohyphidae: 
lack  of  hindwingpads  in  both  sexes;  hindtarsi  that  are  three-fourths  to  subequal 
in  length  to  that  of  their  respective  tibiae;  a  mature  body  length  of  less  than  3.6 
mm.;  abdominal  terga  1-10  with  minute  posteromarginal  spines;  an  abdomen  that 
is  triangulate  in  cross-section;  operculate  gills  with  an  inner  ventral  lamellae 
approximately  one-half  of  the  length  of  the  outer  lamellae,  and  with  both  lamel- 
lae lacking  fringes  or  flaps;  and  operculate  gills  that  are  subtriangulate  and 
devoid  of  submedial  or  subdistal,  unsclerotized  bands. 

Couplet  1  of  the  larval  key  to  the  North  and  Central  American  genera  of 
Leptohyphidae  (Wiersema  an  McCafferty  2000:356),  and  thus  the  larval  charac- 
teristics associated  with  the  subfamilies  Tricorythodinae  and  Leptohyphinae  in 
North  and  Central  America,  require  modification  to  accommodate  the  new  genus 
and  new  morphological  data  presented  herein.  The  modified  couplet  1  follows. 

1  Posterior  margin  of  abdominal  terga  1-6  either  without  spines,  or,  in  certain  small  larvae,  with 

minute  spines.  Hindtarsi  more  than  one-half  length  of  hindtibiae.  Hindwingpads  absent 

Tricorythodinae 2 

1  Posterior  margins  of  abdominal  terga  1-6  or  2-6  with  spines.  Hindtarsi  approximately  one-half  to 
much  less  than  one-half  length  of  hindtibiae.  Hindwingpads  present  in  males,  present  or  absent  in 
females  Leptohyphinae 7 

In  addition,  in  the  first  half  of  couplet  4  in  the  larval  key,  Tricorythopsis 
should  be  changed  to  Ableptemetes.  In  using  couplet  1  of  the  adult  key  to  genera 
(Wiersema  and  McCafferty  2000:  358),  users  should  go  directly  to  couplet  3. 
rather  than  couplet  2  as  indicated,  if  the  adult  specimen  keys  to  Tricorythodinae. 
Couplet  2  can  be  entirely  deleted  from  the  adult  key. 


40  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


It  is  important  to  reiterate  that  the  key  in  Wiersema  and  McCafferty  (2000), 
and  as  slightly  modified  herein,  is  intended  for  the  North  and  Central  American 
Leptohyphidae  only.  This  was  stated  emphatically  by  Wiersema  and  McCafferty 
(2000),  because  of  their  prediction  that  numerous  genera  in  South  America  were 
yet  to  be  discovered  and  described.  This  prediction  is  now  being  borne  out  with 
recent  discoveries  of  additional  genera,  for  example,  by  Molineri  (2001b,  2002). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Allen,  R.  K.  and  R.  C.  Brusca.  1973.  New  species  of  Leptohyphinae  from  Mexico  and  Central 
America  (Ephemeroptera:  Tricorythidae).  Canadian  Entomologist  105:83-95. 

Molineri,  C.  1999.  Revision  of  the  genus  Tricorythopsis  (Ephemeroptera:  Leptohyphidae)  with  the 
description  of  four  new  species.  Aquatic  Insects  21:285-300. 

Molineri,  C.  200 la.  El  genero  Tricorythopsis  (Ephemeroptera:  Leptohyphidae):  nuevas  combina- 
ciones  y  descripcions  de  nuevas  especies  y  estadios.  Revista  de  la  Sociedad  Entomologica 
Argentina  60:217-238. 

Molineri,  C.  2001b.  Traverhyphes:  a  new  genus  of  Leptohyphidae  for  Leptohyphes  indicator  and 
related  species.  Spixiana  24:129-140. 

Molineri,  C.  2002.  A  new  genus  of  Leptohyphidae  (Insecta:  Ephemeroptera).  pp.  337-345.  In,  E. 
Dominguez  (Editor).  Trends  in  Research  in  Ephemeroptera  and  Plecoptera.  Kluwer  Academic/ 
Plenum,  New  York. 

Wiersema,  N.  A.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2000.  Generic  revision  of  the  North  and  Central  American 
Leptohyphidae  (Ephemeroptera:  Pannota).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society 

126:337-371. 


Vol.  I  14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 4_1_ 

A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  THE  GENUS  TOMOCERUS 

(TOMOCERINA)  FROM  CHINA  (COLLEMBOLA: 

TOMOCERIDAE)  WITH  A  DISCUSSION  OF  THE 

SUBGENERA  OF  TOMOCERUS1 

Yi-Tong  Ma,'  Jian-Xiu  Chen,'  and  Kenneth  Christiansen4 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  species  Tomocerus  (Tomocerina)  yiliensis,  from  Xinjiang  of  northwest  China 
is  described.  It  is  distinct  from  all  other  members  of  the  subgenus  because  of  the  large  number  of 
setae  on  the  trochanteral  organ.  The  presence  of  more  than  one  trochanteral  organ  seta  forces  a  re- 
examination  of  the  subgenera  of  Tomocerus,  the  subgenus  Tomocerina,  and  the  role  of  trochanteral 
organ  setae  in  dividing  subgenera  of  Tomocerus. 

KEY  WORDS:  Tomocerus  Collembola,  Tomocerina,  Tomocerinae,  China,  new  species. 

The  genus  Tomocerus  was  created  by  Nicolet  (1842)  and  later  given  the  type 
species  Macrotoma  minor  Lubbock  1862  (opinion  239  ICZN,  1954:363).  The 
genus  was  characterized  by  long,  greatly  subdivided  antennae  with  the  3rd  anten- 
nal  segment  more  than  3  times  as  long  as  the  fourth;  an  elongate  toothed  mucro, 
dental  spines,  6  +  6  eyes  and  body  scales.  Meanwhile,  Frauenfeld  described  a 
related  genus  Tritomurus  in  1854,  differing  primarily  in  the  absence  of  eyes.  In 
1896  Schaffer  placed  these  genera  in  a  subfamily  of  Entomobryidae  -  Tomo- 
cerinae -  and  in  1913  Borner  raised  them  to  family  level.  Both  treatments  have 
continued  to  the  present  day.  In  1897  Schaffer  created  a  new  genus,  Lepido- 
phorella  with  a  third  antennal  segment  less  than  twice  as  long  as  the  fourth.  This 
and  related  taxa  were  eventually  split  off  as  a  separate  subfamily  Lepidophorel- 
linae,  distinguished  from  the  other  Tomoceridae  by  its  relatively  much  longer  4th 
antennal  segment.  The  species  with  the  shorter  4th  antennal  segment  are  now 
placed  in  the  subfamily  Tomocerinae.  In  addition  most  genera  of  Lepidophorel- 
linae  lack  antennal  annulations  and  have  much  shorter  mucrones  than  do  genera 
of  the  subfamily  Tomocerinae.  Except  for  a  few  obvious  anthropochore  species, 
the  subfamily  Tomocerinae  is  limited  to  the  northern  hemisphere,  whereas  the 
Lepidophorellinae  are  found  only  in  the  southern  hemisphere.  Others  have  des- 
cribed additional  related  genera  or  subgenera  in  the  Lepidophorellinae:  by 
Womersley  Neophorella  (1934)  and  Millsia  (1942);  by  Salmon  Antcnmicynns 
(1941),  and  Novocerus  (1942);  and  by  Ireson  and  Greenslade,  Lasofimts  ( 1990). 
In  the  Tomocerinae,  Paclt  described  Pogonognathellns  (1944)  and  Mills  des- 
cribed Tomolonus  (1949).  Most  subgenera  of  Tomocerinae  were  created  by  Yosii: 
Monodontocerus  and  Tomocerina  (\955),Aphaenomurus  and  Plutoniums  ( 1956) 
and  Lethenmrus  (1970).  Yosii  (1967)  considered  most  of  these  as  separate  gen- 
era. Other  authors  have  varied  from  treating  all  as  valid  genera  to  considering  all 


1  Received  on  March  IX.  2002.  Accepted  December  1 1 ,  2003. 

;  Department  of  Biology,  Nantong  Teacher's  College.  Nantong  226000.  People's  Republic  of  China. 
'  Department  of  Biology,  Nanjing  University,  Nanjing  210093,  People's  Republic  of  China. 
4  Department  of  Biology. Grinnell  College. Grinnell.  Iowa  501 1 2.  U.S.A.  E-mail:  christakfp  grinnell.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  M.  2004 


42 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


f  •/  f-    '  1-   V 
°!  •  f '     ./?  A    «x 


9 


12A 


Figs.  1-15.  T.Tomocerinayiliensissp.nov.  1.  habitus;  2.  labrum;  3.  dorsum  of  head;  4.  dor- 
sal chaetotaxy  of  Th.  II  -  Abd.  V;  5.  trochanteral  organ;  6.  hind  tibiotarsus,  showing  blunt  setae; 
7.  hind  foot  complex;  8.  tenaculum;  9.  anterior  face  of  ventral  tube;  10.  posterior  face  of  ven- 
tral tube;  1 1 .  lateral  flap  of  ventral  tube;  12  A.  manubrium  (dorsal  view),  dotted  line  represents 
mid  line;  12B.  lateral  seta  of  manubrium;  12C.  dorsal  seta  of  manubrium;  13.  dental  spines; 
14.  mucro;  15.  upper  anal  flap  chaetotaxy. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


43 


12c    12n 


14 


15 


as  subgenera  of  Tomocerus  but  all  have  considered  these  supraspecific  taxa  as 
members  of  the  family  Tomoceridae.  Below  we  describe  a  new  species  of  the 
subgenus  Tomocerina. 


Tomocerus  (Tomocerina)  yiliensis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-15) 

Maximum  body  length:  3.6  mm. 

Color:  Ground  color  pale  yellow.  Eye  patches  dark  blue  to  black.  Ant.  Ill  &  IV  with  dark  blue 
pigment.  Pale  blue  pigment  also  present  on  tibiotarsi  and  anterior  margin  of  Th.  II  (Fig.  1).  Scales 
brownish,  hyaline  and  heavily  striated. 

Head:  Eyes  6+6,  all  subequal.  Antennae  0.31-0.42  times  as  long  as  body  and  1.8  -  2.6  times  as 
long  as  head.  Third  segment  6  -  9  times  as  long  as  fourth.  Labral  setae  4/5.5.4.  all  smooth;  each  of 
distal  3  rows  with  clear  basal  papillae.  Anterior  margin  of  labrum  with  4  recurved  spinules  (Fig.  2). 

Chaetotaxy:  Dorsum  of  head  with  13-23  setae  of  different  size  near  the  antennal  bases  and  6 
anterior  interocular  macrochaetae  in  a  medial  hexagon.  7  macrochaetae  directly  anterior  to  median 
furrow,  3  +  3  lateral  median  setae  and  posterior  margin  with  a  row  of  36-75  small  setae  (Fig.  3). 
Macrochaetae  and  bothriotricha  of  thorax  and  abdomen  as  shown  in  Fig.  4.  Upper  anal  (lap  with  14 
large  setae  arranged  in  2  irregular  transverse  rows  (Fig.  15).  Body  macrochacta  with  0-3  basal  micro- 
setae. 

Legs:  Trochanteral  organ  with  one  somewhat  larger  and  8-22  smaller  smooth  setae  on  trochanter 
and  one  large  seta  on  femur  (Fig.  5).  Two  (rarely  one)  blunt  setae  on  ventral  side  of  tibiotarsus  3,  Ink 
ly  ciliate  setae,  distributed  as  shown  in  Fig.  6.  Unguis  slender  with  a  paired  pseudoiuchia  0.2S-0.52 
times  as  long  as  inner  edge  of  unguis;  inner  ungual  teeth  6-7.  rarely  4  or  5.  Unguiculus  lanceolate 
without  inner  teeth.  Tenent  hair  spatulate,  0.64-0.96  times  as  long  as  inner  edge  of  unguis  (Fig.  7). 

Tenaculum:   rami  with  4+4  teeth,  corpus  unsealed  yvith  1  smooth  seta  (Fig.  8). 

Ventral  tube:  scaled  on  all  sides,  anterior  face  with  27-50  striate  setae  of  different  si/es  on  each 
side  (Fig.  9);  posterior  with  37-61  striate  setae  of  different  sizes  (Fig.  10):  lateral  flap  with  50-96  stn 
ate  setae  of  different  sizes  (Fig.  1 1 ). 

Furcula:   Dens  1.32  -  2.6  times  as  long  as  manuhrium  and  4-5  times  as  long  as  mucro.  Manu 
brium  scaled  dorso-laterally  with  a  row  of  8-10  large  setae  on  each  side,  all  weak  I  \  ciliate  and  strong- 
ly tapering  near  apex  but  not  spinelike  (Figs.  12A  &  B):  dorsally  with  2  setaceous  stupes,  each  con 
sisting  of  numerous  acuminate,  striate  setae  of  different  sizes  (Fig.  I2C).  14-24  of  them  ver\  large. 
Dental  spines  dark  brown,  formula  l()-12(  13)/4-6, 1.  Proximal  spines  arranged  in  2  irregular  rou  s;  .ill 
simple  with  fine  longitudinal  striations  (Fig.  13).  Mucro  elongate  with  numerous  ciliate  setae;  outer 
dorsal  lamella  entire  with  2-6  intermediate  teeth:  apical  and  anteapical  teeth  suhcqual  (Fig.  14t. 


44  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Types:  Holotype  female,  China:  Xinjiang,  Yili,  Narat  Prairie,  altitude  1500m- 1600m,  VIII- 12- 
2000,  Jian-xiu  Chen,  Songjie  Wang  &  Fang  Wang  colls.  Locality  C9086;  paratypes:  15  females.all 
on  slides,  same  data  as  holotype.  Deposited  in  the  Department  of  Biology,  Nanjing  University. 

Ecology:  Found  under  stones  and  decayed  wood  in  grassland. 
Etymology:  The  new  species  is  named  after  the  locality  of  the  types. 

Discussion:  The  new  species  shares  some  characteristics  with  Japanese  T. 
Tomocerina  aokii  Yosii  (1972),  such  as  the  number  of  inner  teeth  on  the  unguicu- 
lus  and  intermediate  teeth  on  the  outer  dorsal  lamella  of  the  mucro.  However,  it 
differs  from  aokii  in  tenaculum  setae  and  in  having  more  than  one  trochanteral 
organ  seta.  The  latter  characteristic  differentiates  yiliensis  from  all  other  des- 
cribed species  of  Tomocerina.  Over  time,  a  number  of  features  have  come  to  be 
considered  as  distinguishing  characteristics  of  the  different  subgenera  of  Tomo- 
cerus.  In  the  Tomocerinae,  these  include  the  number  of  basal  mucronal  teeth,  the 
presence  or  absence  of  a  small  toothlet  on  one  basal  mucronal  tooth,  the  presence 
or  absence  of  large  spine-like  scales  on  the  inner  face  of  the  base  of  the  denies, 
the  presence  of  large  lateral  spines  on  the  base  of  the  denies,  the  presence  or 
absence  of  eyes,  and  Ihe  nalure  of  Ihe  Irochanteral  organ.  In  Ihis  family  this 
occurs  on  Ihe  base  of  Ihe  femur  as  well  as  Ihe  trochanter.  Il  has  been  long  accepl- 
ed  lhal  there  is  a  sharp  dislinction  laxa  having  only  a  single  such  sela  on  femur 
and  Irochanler  (Tomocerus,  Pogonognathellus,  Monodontocerus,  Tomocerina), 
ihose  wilh  more  lhan  one  seta  on  Ihe  femur  bul  only  one  on  Ihe  Irochanter  (Apha- 
enomurus  and  Tomolomis)  and  those  wilh  more  lhan  one  on  both  femur  and 
trochanter  (Plutomurus  and  Lethemurus).  Until  Ihe  presenl  sludy,  Tomocerina 
was  considered  a  member  of  the  first  group.  The  Irochanleral  organ  setae  on  T. 
yiliensis  are  different  in  size  and  dislribulion  from  Ihose  of  other  mulliselaceous 
Tomocerine  trochanteral  organs  and  their  analogy  wilh  ihese  remains  in  doubl. 
Assuming  lhal  these  are  Irochanleral  organ  selae  we  re-examined  Nearclic  spec- 
imens assigned  lo  species  of  T.  (Tomocerina).  This  showed  thai  some  populalions 
of  T.  (Tomocerina)  lameUiferus  may  have  more  lhan  one  Irochanleral  organ  sela 
on  their  trochanler  and  lhal  specimens  from  Colorado  previously  identified  as  T. 
(Tomocerina)  curtus  are  in  fact  a  species  of  Tomolomis  lacking  clear  spine-like 
ouler  basal  selae  on  Ihe  dens.  In  addition,  we  have  recenlly  examined  specimens 
of  Tritomnrus  scutellatus,  and  these  appear  to  have  one  Irochanleral  organ  seta 
on  Ihe  Irochanler.  These  discoveries  make  the  distinction  between  Tomocerina 
and  Plutoniums  less  clear  cul;  however,  Ihe  number  and  size  of  Ihe  selae  in  the 
femoral  trochanleral  organ  and  the  presence  or  absence  of  spine-like  setae  on  the 
ouler  basal  denies  slill  serve  lo  dislinguish  Ihe  vasl  majorily  of  Plutomurus  and 
Tomocerina  species.  A  reassessmenl  of  Ihe  crileria  separaling  the  supraspecific 
categories  of  Tomocerinae  is  clearly  in  order.  This  might  result  in  fusing  some  of 
these  subgeneric  categories. 

Most  species  of  Tomocerina  are  very  close  lo  Ihe  genus  Tomocerus  (s.  s.) 
excepl  for  Ihe  absence  of  a  loolhlel  on  the  outer  basal  tooth  of  the  mucro. 
T.  (Tomocerina)  yiliensis  differs  from  members  of  the  subgenus  Tomocerus  (s.s.) 


Vol.  114.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 45 

in  having  more  than  one  trochanteral  organ  seta  on  the  trochanter  as  well  as  lack- 
ing the  basal  toothlet.  Tomocerina  is  a  small  subgenus  containing  only  9-12 
species,  four  of  these  were  described  or  have  been  reported  from  China:  ininutits 
Tullberg  1876  from  Shanxi  and  (as  varius)  from  Yunnan,  calceus  and  purpu- 
rithorus  Liu  et  al.  1999  from  Sichuan  and  yiliensis  from  Xinjiang. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

This  study  was  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  39970097). 
Publication  of  this  work  was  made  possible  by  a  grant  from  Grinnell  College.  We  would  give  our 
thanks  to  Miss  Wang  Fang  in  Nanjing  University  for  her  useful  help  in  the  collection  and  preparation 
of  the  specimens  for  this  study.  Summer  Ventis  assisted  in  the  preparation  of  the  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Burner,  C.  1913.  Die  Familien  der  Collembolen.  Zoologischer  Anzeiger  41:315-322. 
Frauenfeld,  G.  1854.  Note  -  no  title.  Gesellschaft  Weiner  Stitzungberichte  4:15-17. 

Ireson,  J.  and  P.  Greenslade.  1990.  Laxofinns  gen.  N.  (Collembola:  Tomoceridae)  from  Tasmania 
and  a  re-examination  of  Neophorella  duhia  Womersley  (Tomoceridae).  Journal  of  the  Australian 
Entomological  Society  29(5):205-214. 

Lubbock,  J.   1862.  Notes  on  Thysanura.  Part  1.  Transactions  of  the  Linnaean  Society  of  London 

23(3):429-448. 

Liu,  Y.  Q.,  Hou,  D.  and  Z.  Li.  1999.  Four  New  Species  of  Tomocerus  (Collembola:  Tomoceridae) 
from  China.  Entomotaxonomia  21(4):239-245. 

Mills  H.  1949.  New  North  American  Tomocerinae.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America 
41(3):  353. 

Nicolet,  H.  1842.  Recherches  pour  Servir  a  1'histoirdes  Podurelles.  Nouvelles  Memoires  Helvetique 
Science  Naturelle  6:1-86. 

Paclt,  J.   1944.  A  new  Name  for  Pogonognathus  Borner.  1908,  nee  Agassiz,  1846.  Entomologicy 

Listy  7:  92. 

Salmon,  J.  1941 .  The  Collembola  Fauna  of  New  Zealand  including  a  discussion  of  its  distribution. 
Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society  of  New  Zealand  70:343-344. 

Salmon,  J.  1942.  New  genera  and  species  of  New  Zealand  Collembola.  Records  of  the  Dominion 
Museum  of  Wellington  I  ( 1  ):55-6(). 

Schaffer,  C.  1896.  Die  Collembolen  der  Umgebung  von  Hamburg  und  benachtbar  Gebeite.  Mittei- 
lungen  Naturhistorsche  Museums  Hamburg  13:147-216. 

Schatt'er,  C.   1897.  Apterygoten.  Hamburger  Maghalenische  Sammelresise  2:1-48. 

Womersley,  H.  1934.  On  some  Collembola  Arthropleona  from  South  Africa  and  Rhodesia.  Annals 
of  South  African  Museum  30(3):464. 

Womersley,  H.  1942.  New  genera,  species  and  records  of  Collembola  from  Australia.  New  Zealand 
and  New  Guinea.  Transactions  Royal  Society  of  South  Australia  66(  1  ):26. 

Yosii,  R.  1955.  Meerinsekten  derTokara  Inseln.  VI.  Publications  Seto  Marine  Biological  Laboratory 
4:379-401. 

Yosii,  R.  1956.  Monographic  /in  Hohlencollenibolen  Japans.  Contributions  trom  the  Biological 
Laboratory  Kyoto  University  3: 1  - 109. 


46  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Yosii,  R.  1967.  Studies  on  the  Collembolan  Family  Tomoceridae,  with  special  Reference  to  Japanese 
Forms.  Contributions  from  the  Biological  Laboratory  Kyoto  University  20:1-54. 

Yosii,  R.   1970.  On  some  Collembola  of  Japan  and  adjacent  countries  II.  Contributions  Biological 
Laboratory  Kyoto  University  23(10):  1-32. 

Yosii,  R.   1972.  Collembola  from  the  Alpine  Region  of  Mt.  Poroshii  in  the  Hidaka  Mountains, 
Hokkaido.  Memoirs  National  Science  Museum  Tokyo  5:75-99. 


Vol.  114.  No.  I .  Januan  &  February  2(1(13 47 

A  NEW  RECORD  OF  TOMOCERUS  BAICALENSIS  FROM 
CHINA  WITH  ITS  REDESCRIPTION 
(COLLEMBOLA:  TOMOCERIDAE)1 

Yi-Tong  Ma,2-'  Jian-\iu  Chen,'  and  Kenneth  Christiansen4 

ABSTRACT:  The  Russian  species.  Tomocerus  baicalensis,  is  reported  for  the  first  time  from  China 
and  it  is  redescribed  on  the  basis  of  these  specimens. 

KEY  WORDS:   Tomocerus  baicalensis,  Collembola,  Tomocerina,  Tomereninae.  China,  new  record. 

The  genus  Tomocerus  (s.s.)  is  distinguished  from  other  Tomoceridae  by  a  com- 
bination of  six  characteristics:  (1)  antennal  segments  III  and  IV  annulate,  (2)  prox- 
imal part  of  dens  lacking  large  spinelike  outer  setae  and  inner  basal  scale  like 
appendages,  (3)  mucro  with  two  basal  teeth,  (4)  a  small  toothlet  present  on  the 
outer  basal  tooth,  (5)  6  +  6  eyes,  and  (6)  a  single  seta  on  the  trochanteral  organ 
position  on  the  trochanter  and  the  proximal  portion  of  the  femur.  There  are  fifty- 
five  species  of  the  genus  Tomocerus  (s.s.),  eighteen  of  them  have  been  described 
or  reported  from  China  (Zhao  et  al.  1997):  four  from  Sichuan  (emeicus  and  max- 
imus  Liu  et  al  1999),  minor  Lubbock  1862  and  vulgaris  Tullberg  1871  (Liu  et  al. 
1998);  four  from  Tibet  (monticolus,  obscums,  pan'us  and  zayuensis  Huang  and 
Yin  1981);  three  from  Anhui  (similis  Chen  and  Ma  1997,  spinulus  Chen  and 
Christiansen  1998,  cheni  Ma  and  Christiansen  1998);  two  from  Fujian  caputivio- 
laceus  and  deogyuensis  Lee  1975  (Liu  et  al.  1998);  one,folsomi  Denis  1929,  from 
Yunnan;  one,  cuspidatus  Borner  1909,  from  Taiwan  (Yosii  1940);  one,  kinoshitai 
Yosii  1954,  from  Hunan;  one,  ocreatus  Denis  1948,  from  Zhejiang:  and,  one, 
sibiricus  Reuter  1891 ,  from  Hebei  (Huang  and  Liu  1995).  A  species  new  to  China, 
Tomocerus  baicalensis  Martynova  1969,  is  reported  from  Xinjing.  Northwest 
China.  This  species  is  redescribed  on  a  basis  of  Chinese  specimens. 

Tomocerus  (Tomocerus)  baicalensis  Martynova,  1969  (Figs.  1-16) 

Body  length:  Chinese  specimens  maximum  3.9  mm. 

Color:  Ground  color  pale  yellow.  Eye  patches  dark  blue.  Frons  and  anterior  margin  of  Th.  II  with 
greenish  pigment.  Ant.  II-IV  green  or  blue.  Pale  greenish  pigment  also  present  on  Abd.  Ill  and  IV. 
tibiotarsi  and  dens  (Fig.  1 ). 

Head:  Eyes  6+6,  subequal.  Antennae  2.4  to  3.8  times  as  long  as  cephalic  diagonal.  Labral  setae 
4/5,  5,  4,  all  smooth;  each  of  distal  3  rows  on  papillae.  Anterior  margin  of  labrum  with  4  recurved 
spinules.  Dorsal  macrochaetae  of  head  as  follows:  anterior  area  (A)  2/4:  mid  (M)  2/7:  lateral  (L)  2 
(LI .  L2).  posterior  (P)  4.  Posterior  margin  of  dorsal  head  with  one  row  of  48-60  tiny  setulae  (Fig.  2). 

Thorax:  Macrochaetae  and  bothriotricha  as  shown  in  Fig.  3.  Tibiotarsus  with  2-5,  4-6,  4-6  blunt 
spiny  setae  respectively  on  ventral  side  of  leg  I-III  (Figs.  5  and  6).  Unguis  rather  slender;  a  pair  of 
pseudonychia  developed,  0.36-0.48  times  as  long  as  inner  edge  of  unguis;  inner  teeth  5-6,  5-6  and  4- 


1  Received  on  March  24.  2003.  Accepted  on  December  1 1 .  2003. 

2  Department  of  Biology,  Nantong  Teacher's  College.  Nantong  226000.  China. 
'  Department  Biology,  Nanjing  University,  Nanjing  210093,  P.R.  China. 

4  Department  Biology.  Grinnel  College,  Grinnell,  IA  501 12,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  christak@grinnell.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


48 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


~r?r- ..-  -.  -.  ^X^^-^p*^ 

i     ^"^S    *     _     •         *     fc,^,  •    ^--^    ^*     ^»       •    »   '     •     '^C.  a      • 


A 


11 


Figs.  1-16.  Tomocerus  baicalensis  Martynova,  1969.  1 .  Habitus;  2.  Dorsum  of  head,  A= 
anterior  microchaetae,  M=  median  macrochaetae,  L=  lateral  macrochaetae,  P=  posterior 
macrochaetae:  3.  Chaetotaxy  of  body;  4.  trochanteral  organ;  5.  hind  tibiotarsus,  show- 
ing blunt  setae;  6.  enlargement  of  blunt  seta;  7.  anterior  face  of  tenaculum;  8.  anterior 
face  of  ventral  tube;  9.  posterior  face  of  ventral  tube;  10.  lateral  flap  of  ventral  tube;  1 1 . 
dorsal  face  left  side  of  manubrium:  12.  enlargement  of  thick  dorso-lateral  large  seta  on 
manubrium;  13.  enlargement  of  normal  large  seta  on  dorsal  stripes;  14.  dental  spines; 
15.  mucro;  16.  upper  anal  valve. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 


49 


12 


6  respectively  on  leg  I-III.  Unguiculus  lanceolate  without  inner  tooth.  Tenent  hair  thick,  0.90-1.08 
times  as  long  as  inner  edge  of  unguis,  apex  spatulate. 

Abdomen:  Macrochaetae  and  bothriotricha  on  Abd.  I-V  as  shown  in  Fig.  3.  Tenaculum  unsealed, 
with  4+4  teeth,  1-9  smooth  setae  on  corpus.  Ventral  tube  scaled;  with  25-28  setae  on  each  side  of 
anterior  face  (Fig.  8).  46-65  on  posterior  face  (Fig.  9),  45-75  on  each  lateral  flap.  Dentes  4.3  to  5 
times  as  long  as  mucro  and  1.4  to  1.78  times  as  long  as  manubrium  (Table  1).  Manubrium  scaled, 
dorso-laterally  with  1  row  of  9-11  large  setae  on  each  side,  all  weakly  ciliate  and  strongly  tapered 
near  apex  (Fig.  12);  dorsally  with  2  setaceous  stripes,  each  consisting  of  numerous  acuminate,  fine- 
ly ciliate  setae  of  different  sizes,  20-26  of  them  large  (Fig.  13).  Dental  spines  as  shown  in  table  1 . 
dark  chestnut  brown,  each  with  1  lateral  toothlet  near  base  (Fig.  14).  Mucro  elongate  with  numerous 
ciliate  setae;  with  4-10  intermediate  teeth;  apical  and  anteapical  teeth  subequal  (Fig.  15).  Upper  anal 
valve  of  Abd.  VI  with  14  large  ciliate  cylindrical  setae  arranged  in  2  irregular  transverse  rows  (Fig. 
16).  Scales  brownish,  hyaline  and  heavily  striated.  Trunk  macrochaetae  and  bothriotricha  surround- 
ed by  0-3  setulae. 

Table  1   Characteristics  of  some  individual  Chinese  specimens  of  Tomocerus 
baicalensis. 


Locality 
number 

Ratio 
Antenna/ 
Cephlic 
diagonal 

Dental 

spine 
formula 

Setae  on 
tenaculum 

Body+ 
head 
mm 

Manubrium 
length 
mm 

Dentes 

length 
mm 

Antenna 
length 
mm 

C9077-  1 

•> 

3-4.1/3.1.2.1 

1 

2.1 

0.4 

0.6 

•) 

C9077-2 

3.  S3 

5-6,1/5.1.2.1 

9 

3.9 

0.6 

1.0 

2.5 

C9077-6 

3.70 

4,1/2.1.2-3.1 

1 

2.3 

0.3 

0.6 

1.5 

C9077-9 

2,  SO 

4-5,1/3.1,2.1 

2  A 

0.3 

0.5 

i.: 

C9077-12 

•  ) 

4,1/3.1.2,1 

4 

2.6 

0.5 

0.7 

C9077-16 

2.40 

4-4,1/3,1.2.1 

•) 

2.4 

0.3 

0.5 

1.1 

C9077-2 

3  20 

5,1/2,1,2,] 

T 

•>  s 

(I  ^ 

0  7 

1  6 

C9077-3 

•j 

M  3,1,2,1 

1 

2.1 

0.4 

0.5 

1.1 

50  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Ecology:  Under  stones  and  in  decayed  wood  in  forest. 

Chinese  locality:  China:  Xinjiang:  Tianshan  Mountain:  Tianchi  Lake,  altitude  1980m,  VIII-2- 
2000,  Collection  number  C9075,  C9077,  and  C9078.  Thirteen  females,  all  on  slides,  collected  by 
Chen  Jian-xiu.  Wang  Songjie,  and  Wang  Fang.  Deposited  in  the  Department  of  Biology,  Nanjing 
University. 

Remarks:  This  species  was  first  described  by  Martynova  ( 1969)  on  a  basis  of 
3  specimens  from  the  southern  shores  of  Lake  Baikal.  It  has  not  been  recorded 
from  Russia  since  that  time.  The  Chinese  specimens,  also  taken  near  the  shores 
of  a  lake,  agreed  with  Martynova's  (1969)  description  and  figures  of  this  species. 
The  species  belongs  to  a  group  of  largely  East  Asian  species  having  the  dental 
spines  with  multiple  teeth.  Both  the  Russian  and  Chinese  populations  of  baical- 
ensis  differ  from  all  other  species  of  the  group  by  having  at  most  one  secondary 
toothlet  on  each  spine.  There  are  a  few  differences  between  the  two  populations. 
These  are  primarily  the  body  color  and  pattern  and  setae  on  the  tenaculum. 
Martynova's  specimens  were  considerably  larger  than  ours  3.7-5.4  mm.  com- 
pared to  ours,  which  were  2.1  -  3.9  mm.  and  this  probably  explains  a  number  of 
differences  such  as  the  tenacular  setae  number.  Michael  Potapov  examined  the 
types  of  baicalensis  and  could  find  no  significant  morphological  differences 
between  them  and  the  drawings  of  the  Chinese  specimens  we  sent  him.  The  dif- 
ference in  color  and  pattern  may  represent  geographic  variation. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  present  study  was  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No. 
39970097).  Publication  of  this  work  was  made  possible  by  a  grant  from  Grinnell  College,  USA. 
Thanks  should  be  given  to  Mr.  Wang  Songjie  and  Miss  Wang  Fang  who  collected  the  specimens  used 
in  this  study.  Stephanie  Peterson  assisted  in  the  preparation  of  the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Chen,  J-X.  and  Y.  T.  Ma.  1997.  A  New  Species  of  the  Genus  Tomocerus  (S.  S.)  (Collembola: 
Tomoceridae)  from  China.  Entomotaxonomia  19(3):  157- 160. 

Chen,  J-X.  and  K.  A.  Christiansen.   1998.  Tomocerus  (s.s.)  spinulus  (Collembola:  Entomobryidae), 
A  New  Species  of  Chinese  Springtail.  Entomological  News  109(l):51-55. 

Huang,  F.  S.  and  H.  Liu.   1995.  Three  new  recorded  species  of  Tomocerus  Nicolet  in  China 
(Collembola  :  Tomoceridae).  Sinozoologia  12:192-193. 

Huang,  F.  S.  and  H-F.  Yin.   1981.  Collembolla:  Tomoceridae  -  Tomocerus  Nicolet.  //;,  Insects  of 
Xizang  1:41-46. 

Liu,  Y.  Q.,  Hou,  D.  B.,  and  Z.  C.  Li.    1 998.  A  Checklist  of  Collembola  Species  from  China.  Journal 
South  West  Agricultural  University  20(2):  125- 13 1 . 

Liu,Y.  Q.,  Hou,D.  B.,  and  Z.C.Li.  1999.  Four  new  species  of  Tomocerus  (Collembola:  Tomoceri- 
dae) from  China.  Entotaxonimia  2l(4):239-245. 

Ma,  Y.  T.   and    K.   Christiansen.   1998.   A   New   Species   of  Tomocerus   (S.S.)   (Collembola: 
Tomoceridae)  from  China.  Entomological  News  109(  1  ):47-50. 

Martynova,  E.  F.   1969.  Springtails  of  the  Family  Tomoceridae  (Collembola)  in  the  USSR.  Revue 
Entomologique  USSR.  68(2):  174- 183. 

Yosii,  R.   1 940.  On  some  Collembola  from  Formosa.  Annotationes  Zoologicae  Japoneses  1 9(  I ):  1 1 4- 
118. 

Zhao,  L.  J.,  H.  Tamura,  and  X.  Ke.   1 997.  Tentative  Checklist  of  Collembolan  Species  from  China 
(Insect).  Publications  of  the  Itako  Hydrobiological  Station  9:15-40. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 


NOTES  ON  THE  DISTRIBUTION  OF 

LEVCTRA  CAROLINENSIS  AND  L.  VARIABILIS 

(PLECOPTERA:  LEUCTRIDAE)  IN  MARYLAND, 

WITH  AMENDED  AND  NEW  STATE  RECORDS1 

Scott  A.  Grubbs- 

ABSTRACT:  The  distributions  of  Leuctra  carolinensis  and  L.  variabilis  in  Maryland  are  clarified. 
The  former  is  a  late  spring  emerging  species  and  known  from  the  Appalachian  Plateaus  and  Blue 
Ridge  portions  of  the  state  while  the  latter  species  emerges  during  late  autumn  and  recorded  only 
from  the  Piedmont  and  Coastal  Plain  Physiographic  Provinces.  The  status  of  Yugus  hiilbosus  in  Mary- 
land is  reevaluated  and  new  state  records  are  reported  for  five  additional  species  of  stoneflies: 
Pteronarcys  dorsata,  Acroneuria frisoni,  Agnelimi  capitata,  Neoperla  stewarti,  and  Isoperla  dicala. 
A  total  of  103  species  are  now  known  to  occur  in  Maryland. 

KEY  WORDS:  Leuctra  carolinensis,  L.  variabilis,  Plecoptera,  Leuctridae,  Maryland. 

Grubbs  ( 1997)  updated  the  species  list  of  stoneflies  from  Maryland  by  includ- 
ing 36  newly  recorded  taxa.  These  additions  amended  previous  lists  of  Stark  et 
al.  (1986)  as  well  as  Duffield  and  Nelson  (1990)  to  95  species.  Grubbs  and  Stark 

(2001)  and  Nelson  et  al.  (2002)  have  subsequently  added  two  species  of  Perlesta 
and  Alloperla  usa  Ricker,  respectively,  to  this  list. 

Nelson  et  al.  (2002)  questioned  the  record  of  Leuctra  variabilis  Hanson, 
which  Grubbs  (1997)  included  with  late  May  collection  data,  correctly  indicat- 
ing that  this  taxon  is  an  autumn-emergent  species  (Hanson,  1941).  Nelson  et  al. 

(2002)  provided  ample  evidence,  via  scanning  electron  microscopy,  that  materi- 
al collected  from  the  same  or  nearby  localities  was  actually  of  the  closely  relat- 
ed species  L.  carolinensis  Claassen.  In  addition.  Nelson  et  al.  (2002)  provided  the 
first  verified  records  of  L.  variabilis  from  Maryland  from  bogs  in  the  Piedmont 
and  Coastal  Plain  Physiographic  Provinces. 

The  primary  intent  of  this  note  is  to  clarify  the  identity  of  the  material  report- 
ed as  L.  variabilis  by  Grubbs  (1997).  Secondarily,  new  state  records  are  provid- 
ed for  five  additional  species  and  the  distribution  of  Yugus  bulbosus  Prison  in 
Maryland  is  clarified.  All  specimens  listed  below  were  collected  by  the  author 
and  are  deposited  in  the  personal  collection  of  S.  A.  Grubbs  at  Western  Kentucky 
University  (WKU).  Consequently,  103  species  of  stoneflies  are  now  recorded 
from  Maryland. 

Family  Leuctridae 

Leuctra  carolinensis  Claassen 

Distribution.  FREDERICK  County  (Duffield  and  Nelson,  1990),  GAR- 
RETT  County. 

Notes.  All  material  reported  by  Grubbs  ( 1997)  from  Garrett  County  and  pre- 


1  Received  on  November  1 1 .  2002.  Accepted  December  17.  2003. 

:  Department  of  Biology,  and  Center  for  Biodiversity  Studies,  Western  Kentucky  University.  Bowling 
Green.  KY  42101 .  U.S.A.  E-mail:  scott.grubbs@wku.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  4.2004 


52  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


viously  identified  by  the  author  as  L.  variabilis  is  L.  carolinensis.  Collection 
records  of  the  latter  species  from  numerous  small  spring-fed  streams  from  the 
Appalachian  Plateaus  Physiographic  Province  in  Maryland  range  from  late  May 
through  early  September  and  were  first  reported  from  Maryland  from  the  Blue 
Ridge  Physiographic  Province  by  Duffield  and  Nelson  (1990).  At  present,  the 
only  known  Maryland  localities  of  L.  variabilis  are  from  a  few  sites  in  Charles 
and  Prince  Georges  counties. 

Family  Pteronarcyidae 

Pteronarcys  dorsata  (Say) 

Distribution.  ALLEGANY  County,  Sideling  Hill  Creek,  1  female,  11  June 
1997. 

Family  Perlidae 

Acroneuria  frisoni  Stark  &  Brown 

Distribution.  ALLEGANY  County,  Sideling  Hill  Creek,  7  males,  16 
females,  1 1-30  June  1997;  same  but  4  males,  2  females,  30  May  1998. 

Agnetina  capitata  (Pictet) 

Distribution.  WASHINGTON  County,  Conococheague  Creek,  1  male,  2  fe- 
males, 14  July  1998. 

Neoperla  stewarti  Stark  &  Baumann 

Distribution.  WASHINGTON  County,  near  confluence  of  Potomac  River 
and  Tonoloway  Creek,  at  light,  1 1  males,  16  females,  23  June  1997. 

Family  Perlodidae 

Isoperla  dicala  Frison 

Distribution.  FREDERICK  County,  Big  Hunting  Creek,  1  male,  3  June 
1997;  WASHINGTON  County,  Licking  Creek,  1  male,  1  female,  15  May  1999. 

Yugus  kirchneri  Nelson 

Distribution.  GARRETT  County. 

Notes.  Nelson  (2001)  demonstrated  that  Y.  bulbosus  is  a  complex  of  three 
closely  related  species.  All  specimens  reported  of  Y.  bulbosus  (Frison)  from 
Maryland  by  Grubbs  (1997)  were  reexamined  and  are  now  considered  to  be  Y. 
kirchneri  Nelson.  The  remaining  species,  Y.  bulbosus,  Y.  kondratieffi  Nelson,  and 
Y.  arinus  (Frison),  are  presently  known  only  from  the  southern  Appalachian 
Mountains. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  Stan  Szczytko  (University  of  Wisconsin  Stevens-Point)  for  confirming  the  identity  of 
Isoperla  dicala,  and  two  anonymous  reviewers  for  improving  the  quality  of  this  manuscript. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  1 .  January  &  February  2003 53_ 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Duffield,  R.  M.  and  C.  H.  Nelson.  1990.  Seasonal  emergence  patterns  and  diversity  of  Plecoptera 
on  Big  Hunting  Creek,  Maryland,  with  a  checklist  of  the  stoneflies  of  Maryland.  Proceedings  of 
the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  92:120-126. 

Grubbs,  S.  A.  1997.  New  records,  zoogeographic  notes,  and  a  revised  checklist  of  stoneflies  (Ple- 
coptera) from  Maryland.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  123:71-84. 

Grubbs,  S.  A.  and  B.  P.  Stark.  2001.  Notes  on  Perlesta  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  from  eastern  North 
America.  Aquatic  Insects  23:119-122. 

Hanson,  J.  F.  1941.  Studies  on  the  Plecoptera  of  North  America,  II.  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  En- 
tomological Society  36:57-66. 

Nelson,  C.  H.  2001 .  The  Yugus  bulbosus  complex,  with  a  comment  on  the  phylogenetic  position  of 
Yngus  within  the  eastern  Perlodini  (Plecoptera:  Perlodidae:  Perlodinae).  Proceedings  of  the  Ento- 
mological Society  of  Washington  103:601-619. 

Nelson,  C.  H.,  R.  Hamilton  IV,  and  R.  M.  Duffield.  2002.  Confirmed  records  ofLeuctra  variabilis 
and  Alloperla  usa  in  Maryland  (Plecoptera:  Leuctridae,  Chloroperlidae).  with  additional  com- 
ments on  the  former  species.  Entomological  News  1 13:137-139. 

Stark,  B.  P.,  S.  W.  Szczytko,  and  R.  W.  Baumann.  1986.  North  American  stoneflies  (Plecoptera): 
systematics,  distribution  and  taxonomic  references.  Great  Basin  Naturalist  46:  383-397. 


54  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

THE  BEE  GENUS  MYDROSOMA  IN  COSTA  RICA 
(HYMENOPTERA:  COLLETIDAE)1 

Charles  D.  Michener 

The  dissoglottine  genus  Mydrosoma,  consisting  of  rarely  collected,  moderate 
sized  to  large  (10  to  17  mm  body  length)  bees,  is  known  from  Mexico  to 
Argentina,  but  in  Central  America  it  has  been  reported  only  from  Panama 
(M.  brooksi  Michener,  1986).  It  is  therefore  of  interest  to  report  a  male  specimen 
of  M.  brooksi  in  the  collection  of  InBio  (Institute  Nacional  de  Biodiversidad)  in 
Heredia,  Costa  Rica,  borrowed  for  study  by  R.  W.  Brooks. 

The  data  are  as  follows:  Guanacaste  Province:  Estacion  Pitilla,  9  km  south  of 
Santa  Cecilia,  700  m  elevation,  March  1990  (P.  Rios,  C.  Moraga  &  R.  Blanco), 
no. 177060. 

The  specimen  differs  from  Panamanian  specimens  of  M.  brooksi  in  that  the 
midbasal  projection  of  sternum  5  is  an  acute  tubercle,  not  a  short  transverse 
lamella  suggesting  a  tubercle.  My  first  reaction  was  to  think  it  represented  a  new 
species,  but  since  its  other  characters  including  those  of  the  hidden  sterna  and 
genitalia  are  as  in  M.  brooksi,  I  think  it  is  that  species. 

The  structure  of  sternum  5  of  the  Costa  Rican  specimen  requires  a  change  in 
couplet  7  of  the  key  to  species  (Michener,  1986,  p.  199);  the  second  alternative 
should  read  "S  V  with  short,  transverse,  median  basal  lamella  or  acute  tubercle; 
first  flagellomere  ..."  (italics  added). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Michener,  C.D.  1986.  A  review  of  the  tribes  Diphaglossini  and  Dissoglottini  (Hymenoptera, 
Colletidae).  University  of  Kansas  Science  Bulletin  53:183-214. 


1  Received  and  accepted  August  19,  2002. 

:  Entomology  Division,  Natural  History  Museum  and  Entomology  Program,  Department  of  Ecology 
and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of  Kansas,  Lawrence,  Kansas  66045,  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
michener@ku.edu. 

Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 55_ 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

ACERPENNA  SULFUROSUS,  COMB.  N. 
(EPHEMEROPTERA:  BAETIDAE)1 

N.  A.  Wiersema2 

Day  (1954)  established  the  species  Baetis  siilfurosiis  Day  for  a  large  number 
of  adult  male  mayflies  collected  within  the  region  of  Sulphur  Creek  in  Sonoma 
County,  California.  To  date,  larvae  have  yet  to  be  associated.  Examination  of  the 
holotype  and  paratype  material  indicated  that  this  species  is  more  properly 
placed  within  the  Nearctic  genus  Acerpenna  Waltz  &  McCafferty  [Acerpenna 
siilfurosiis  (Day),  comb,  n.],  not  Baetis  Leach. 

Among  North  American  Baetidae  fauna  only  the  species  of  Acerpenna  possess 
the  following  combination  of  features:  forewings  with  double  marginal  inter- 
calaries;  relatively  narrow  hindwings,  with  an  undulate  costal  border  and  often 
three  longitudinal  veins;  a  male  subgenital  plate  roughly  in  the  form  of  a  conical 
process  (difficult  to  see  in  older  specimens);  and  elongate  apical  segment  of  the 
male  forceps  (Waltz  and  McCafferty  1987).  Acerpenna  siilfurosiis  is  consistent 
in  all  features  outlined  above  and  is  therefore  transferred  from  Baetis  to  Acer- 
penna . 

Although  the  reasoning  for  the  above  action  is  essential  equivalent  to  that  of 
McCafferty  (1999),  the  adult  type  material  of  A.  sulfurosus  has  been  examined, 
allowing  a  more  comprehensive  comparison  of  this  species  and  that  of  Acer- 
penna pygmae  a  (McDunnough). 

I  would  like  to  thank  W.  Pulawski  and  B.  Zuparko  (California  Academy  of 
Science)  for  loan  of  type  material. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Day,  W.  C.  1954.  New  Species  of  California  Mayflies  in  the  genus  Baetis  (Ephemeroptera).  Pan- 
Pacific  Entomologist  30:29-34. 

McCafferty,  W.  P.  1999.  Acerpenna  thermophilos,  comb.  n.  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae).  Entomo- 
logical News  110:187-189. 

Waltz,  R.  D.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  1987.  New  genera  of  Baetidae  for  some  Nearctic  species  pre- 
viously included  in  Baetis  Leach  (Ephemeroptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
America  80:667-670. 


1  Received  on  March  12.  2002.  Accepted  December  8,  2003. 

:  MEG,  Inc.  Consulting  Scientists  and  Engineers,  4807  Spicewood  Springs  Rd..  Austin.  TX  78759. 
U.S.A.  E-mail:  Nick.Wiersema@mfgenv.com. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


56  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

A  REPLACEMENT  NAME  FOR 
STAGETUS  CONVEXUS  WHITE 
(COLEOPTERA:  ANOBIIDAE)1 

Gianluca  Nardi2 

Stagetus  convexus  White,  1975:  181  from  Mexico  is  a  junior  secondary  hom- 
onym of  S.  andalusiacus  convexus  (Pic,  1921:  9)  from  Algeria  (Pic,  1921:g 
Espanol,  1969),  which  was  described  as  Theca  (Anomotheca)  convexa.  No  syn- 
onym of  Stagetus  convexus  White  is  known  so,  according  to  the  ICZN  (1999  Art. 
60.3),  the  following  replacement  name  is  proposed  for  it:  Stagetus  whitei  NEW 
NAME. 
Etymology.  The  replacement  name  is  a  patronym  for  Richard  E.  White. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Espanol,  F.  1969.  Notas  sobre  Anobidos  (Coleoptera).  XXXV.  -  Los  Stagetit.s  Well,  del  Mediter- 
raneo  occidental.  Eos  44(  1968):  103- 1 19. 

ICZN  (International  Commission  on  Zoological  Nomenclature).  1999.  International  Code  of 
Zoological  Nomenclature.  Fourth  edition  adopted  by  the  International  Union  of  Biological 
Sciences.  The  International  Trust  for  Zoological  Nomenclature,  London,  I-XXIX  +  306  pp. 

Pic,  M.  1921.  Notes  diverses,  descriptions  et  diagnoses  (Suite.).  L'Echange,  Revue  Linne  enne 
37(405  ):9- 10. 

White,  R.  E.  1975.  Sixteen  new  neotropical  Anobiidae  with  a  new  genus  and  keys  (Coleoptera). 
Proceeding  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  77(2):  169-188. 


'  Received  on  September  7,  2003 .  Accepted  on  February  3,  2004. 

2  Centre  Nazionale  per  lo  Studio  e  la  Conservazione  della  Biodiversita  Forestale  —  Corpo  Forestale 
dello  Stato.  Strada  Mantova  29, 1-46045  Marmirolo  (MN),  Italy.  E-mail:  l_nardi@hotmail.com. 

Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 57_ 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

OTOCRYPTOPS  GRACILIS  BERKELEYENSIS 
VERHOEF,  1938,  A  SYNONYM  OF  SCOLOPOCRYPTOPS 

GRACILIS  WOOD,  1862  (CHILOPODA: 
SCOLOPENDROMORPHAiSCOLOPOCRYPTOPIDAE)1 

Rowland  M.  Shelley2 

In  my  study  of  the  North  American  scolopendromorph  centipede  fauna 
(Shelley  2002),  I  recognized  six  species  in  the  genus  Scolopocryptops  Newport, 
1844  (=Otocryptops  Haase,  1887),  four  occurring  east  of  the  Central  Plains  and 
two  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains,  primarily  along  the  Pacific  Coast.  One  of  the 
latter,  S.  gracilis  Wood,  1862,  consists  of  three  allopatric  populations,  the  largest 
of  which  occupies  an  irregularly  shaped  area  extending  from  northern  California 
to  an  unknown  distance  in  Baja  California  North  with  an  eastward  extension 
through  the  Mojave  Desert  into  southwestern  Utah  and  northwestern  Arizona.  I 
placed  four  species  in  synonymy  under  S.  gracilis  -  S.  lanatipes  Wood,  1862;  S. 
californica  Humbert  and  Saussure,  1870;  Anethops  occidentals  Chamberlin, 
1902;  and  S.  tmindus  Chamberlin,  191 1 ,  the  last  two  being  new  synonymies  at  that 
time.  While  recently  reviewing  a  paper  by  K.  W.  Verhoeff  (1938)  on  another  mat- 
ter, I  discovered  the  description  of  Otocryptops  gracilis  berkeleyensis  that  I  did 
not  know  existed.  This  account  was  based  on  a  specimen  from  Berkeley,  Alameda 
County,  California,  that  was  collected  by  A.E.  Michelbacher  in  May  of  an  un- 
known year  and  sent  to  Verhoeff,  who  thought  it  warranted  taxonomic  recogni- 
tion. My  conclusions  about  S.  gracilis  in  2002  were  based  upon  examinations  of 
some  700  individuals  in  30  samples,  of  which  76  individuals  and  33  samples  were 
from  counties  bordering  San  Francisco  Bay,  and  17  individuals  and  7  samples 
were  from  Berkeley  itself.  I  found  no  evidence  of  clinal  or  geographic  variation 
in  S.  gracilis  and  no  reason  to  recognize  subspecies  or  geographic  races.  I  there- 
fore formally  place  O.  g.  berkeleyensis  in  synonymy  under  S.  gracilis  (syn.  nov.). 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

I  thank  R.  L.  Hoffman  for  a  prepublication  review. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Shelley,  R.  M.  2002.  A  synopsis  of  the  North  American  centipedes  of  the  order  Scolopendromorpha 
(Chilopoda).  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History  Memoir  5:1-108. 

Verhoeff,  K.  VV.   1938.  Chilopoden-Studien.  /ur  Kenntnis  der  Epimorphen.  Zoologische  Jahrbiicher 

71:339-388. 


'  Received  on  February  18.  2004.  Accepted  on  February  20.  2004. 

-'Research  Lab..  North  Carolina  State  Museum  of  Natural  Sciences,  4301   Reedy  Creek  Road. 
Raleigh.  NC  27607,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rowland.shelley@ncmail.net. 

Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


58  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

MITES  OF  GREENHOUSES,  IDENTIFICATION,  BIOLOGY  AND  CON- 
TROL. Zhi-Qiang  Zhang.  2003.  CAB  I  Publishing,  CAB  International,  Walling- 
ford,  Oxon  OX10  8DE,  UK.  240  pp.  Hardcover.  ISBN  085199590X.  US$80.00. 

Mites  are  important  pests  in  greenhouses  around  the  world,  yet  the  number  of  people  trained  in 
mite  taxonomy  is  decreasing.  Fewer  and  fewer  entomology  departments  in  the  USA  provide  training 
on  mite  management.  Thus,  many  pest  managers  will  be  given  the  task  of  managing  mites  in  green- 
houses without  formal  training  in  the  study  of  mites  (acarology).This  book  thus  identifies  a  real  need. 
According  to  the  preface,  this  book  is  "based  on  a  training  manual  prepared  by  the  author  for  a  'Short 
Course  on  Mites  of  Greenhouses' ....  primarily  designed  to  help  students,  entomologists,  pest  control 
workers,  and  growers  to  identify  mites  that  commonly  occur  on  greenhouse  crops,  although  the  biol- 
ogy and  control  of  major  mite  pests  were  also  covered.  The  focus  of  the  course  on  identification  was 
warranted  because  any  successful  management  of  pests  starts  with  the  correct  diagnosis  of  pest  dam- 
age and  identification  of  pest  species..." 

The  book  is  divided  into  three  parts:  I.  An  introduction  to  greenhouses,  crops  and  mites,  mite  clas- 
sification, morphology  and  biology,  methods  for  collecting,  preserving  and  preparing  mites.  Part  II 
includes  identification,  biology  and  control  of  pest  mites,  including  spider  mites,  false  spider  mites, 
tarsonemids,  eriophyoid  mites,  acarid  mites,  and  others.  Part  III  covers  the  identification,  biology  and 
application  of  beneficial  mites  in  biological  control,  including  chapters  on  phytoseiids,  laelapids  and 
other  predatory  mites.  The  book  includes  a  glossary  and  an  appendix  with  information  about  acaro- 
logical  journals,  societies,  courses,  websites,  and  an  index. 

Chapter  2  provides  an  introduction  to  the  major  taxonomic  groups  of  mites,  but  the  line  drawings 
and  keys  provided  require  that  the  student  have  cleared,  slide-mounted  specimens  to  examine  under 
a  compound  microscope.  Many  pest  managers  and  growers  will  be  unable  to  use  these  keys  because 
they  lack  the  necessary  chemicals  to  process  specimens  and  compound  or  phase-contrast  micro- 
scopes to  see  morphological  traits.  It  is  only  in  Chapter  3  that  students  are  told  how  to  collect,  pre- 
serve, and  prepare  mites  for  microscopic  study.  The  novice  is  not  told  that  these  keys  only  work  on 
adults  and  that  key  traits  may  be  difficult  to  discern  if  the  specimens  are  incorrectly  mounted. 
However,  the  keys  themselves  are  useful  and  concise.  Chapters  4-9  describe  the  morphology,  biolo- 
gy, and  damage  caused  by  plant-feeding  mite  families.  Each  includes  an  illustrated  key  to  the  genera 
and  species  found  in  greenhouses.  Without  additional  training,  I  doubt  a  novice  could  use  the  keys, 
although  they  are  concise  and  useful  for  somewhat  more  experienced  workers.  Similarly,  chapters  10- 
12  provide  information  on  the  morphology,  biology  and  role  each  beneficial  predatory  species  plays 
in  the  control  of  plant-feeding  mites  in  greenhouses.  However,  anyone  requiring  details  on  how  to 
release,  when  to  release,  or  how  to  monitor  the  effects  of  such  releases  won't  find  this  information. 
Monitoring  methods  and  information  on  compatible  pesticides  (or  how  to  determine  which  pesticides 
are  compatible  with  natural  enemies)  are  lacking. 

This  book  contains  a  wealth  of  information  particularly  useful  for  entomologists  and  students  with 
training  in  microscopy  and  monitoring  methods.  It  provides  pest  managers  and  growers  with  a  con- 
cise summary  of  useful  information  on  mite  biology  and  damage,  as  well  as  information  on  websites 
with  color  photos  and  additional  information.  It  is  not,  however,  an  adequate  source  of  information 
on  the  "nuts  and  bolts"  of  managing  mites  in  greenhouses.  The  pest  manager  and  grower  will  need 
additional  training  to  identify  pest  mites  and  to  deploy  the  available  mite  management  tactics  in 
greenhouses. 

Marjorie  A.  Hoy,  Department  of  Entomology  and  Nematology 
University  of  Florida,  Gainesville,  FL  3261 1-0620.  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  mahoy@ifas.utl.edu 


Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  I .  January  &  February  2003 59_ 

BOOK  REVIEW 

A  COLOR  HANDBOOK  OF  BIOLOGICAL  CONTROL  IN  PLANT  PROTEC- 
TION. Beil  Helyer,  Kevin  Brown,  and  Nigel  D.  Cattlin.  2003.  Timber  Press,  Inc. 
126  pp.  Includes  418  color  photos,  taxonomic  and  subject  indices,  and  refer- 
ences. $39.95  plus  shipping  and  handling,  hardcover. 

As  the  authors  indicate  in  the  preface,  books  on  the  practical  use  of  biological  control  are  uncom- 
mon and  often  address  the  subject  in  a  very  general  manner.  Overall,  this  is  one  of  the  better  hand- 
books covering  the  use  of  beneficial  organisms  in  crop  production  systems.  It  could  be  used  as  a  ref- 
erence guide  for  consultants,  scientists,  producers  and  home  gardeners.  The  color  pictures  are  excel- 
lent and  provide  the  most  complete  listing  of  a  wide  variety  of  beneficial  organisms.  The  book  is 
divided  into  four  main  sections:  crop  environments,  pest  profiles,  beneficial  arthropod  profiles  and 
entomopathogens.  One  key  component  of  all  successful  integrated  pest  management  programs  is  a 
good  understanding  of  the  plant-insect  connection.  Although  the  information  contained  in  the  crop 
environment  section  was  informative  and  broadly  addressed  this  connection,  this  area  could  have 
been  addressed  in  more  detail.  A  minor  criticism  of  this  section  is  that  it  would  be  more  helpful  if  the 
subsections  covered  were  similar.  It  appears  that  the  authors  were  attempting  to  compare  the  various 
crop  environments  (arable,  fruit  production  and  protected  systems);  however,  they  often  went  in  dif- 
ferent directions.  In  addition,  the  section  on  practical  tips  for  gardeners  was  informative  but  seemed 
out  of  place. 

The  overall  arrangement  of  the  book  is  very  good  and  demonstrates  the  authors  understanding  of 
the  need  for  a  practical  reference  guide.  The  pest  profile  section  is  very  well  done  including  a  color 
pest  identification  guide,  description  of  pest  characteristics,  cropping  systems  affected,  plant  damage 
symptoms  and  common  biological  control  agents  for  each  pest  group.  The  main  section  of  this  hand- 
book, beneficial  arthropod  and  entomopathogen  profiles,  is  excellent  and  makes  this  a  must  for  any- 
one interested  in  applied  biological  control.  It  is  divided  into  four  areas:  species  characteristics;  life 
cycles;  crop/pest  associations;  and  influences  on  growing  practices.  The  last  section  makes  this  hand- 
book unique  because  it  summarizes  when  you  can  make  practical  use  of  natural  enemies  in  an  inte- 
grated system. 

In  addition  to  a  reference  manual.  I  can  see  this  manual  being  used  for  extension  training  pro- 
grams for  consultants,  certified  crop  advisers,  producers  and  master  gardeners.  It  is  reasonably  priced 
and  is  a  must  for  anyone  interested  in  identification  of  natural  enemies  and  the  development  of  pro- 
grams focusing  on  biological  control. 

Joanne  Whalen 

Extension  IPM  Specialist.  Department  of  Entomology 

University  of  Delaware,  Townsend  Hall 

Newark,  Delaware  1 19716-1303.  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  jwhalen@udel.edu 


Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


60 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

INSECTS  REVEALED:  MONSTERS  OR  MARVELS?  Jacques  de  Tonnancour. 
Translated  from  the  French  by  Luke  Sandford.  Foreword  by  Sue  Hubbell.  2002. 
Cornell  University  Press,  Sage  House.  512  E.  State  Street,  Ithaca,  NY  14850 
United  States.  166  pp.  Hardcover  US$35.00. 

At  times,  scientists  are  asked  why  they  study  a  subject  with  so  much  passion  and  determination. 
One  possible  answer  for  entomologists  is  revealed  in  the  pages  of  he  book  Insects  Revealed: 
Monsters  or  Marvels?  This  tome  showcases  the  splendor  of  the  insect  world,  particularly  that  of  the 
most  speciose  of  them  all,  coleopterans,  and  of  the  most  popular,  lepidopterans.  Whether  one  con- 
siders these  hexapodans  attractive  or  not,  de  Tonnancour  brings  the  glory  of  some  of  the  showiest 
insects  to  life  through  spectacular  photography.  The  prose,  translated  from  French  by  Sandford, 
makes  reading  this  work  inviting  and  effortless  while  extending  a  gentle  challenge  to  learn  about  the 
creepy  creatures.  Although  there  are  some  photos  of  mounted  specimens  that  remove  some  of  the 
charm  of  in  situ-Vike  imagery,  most  portrayed  insects,  whether  butterflies  or  moths  with  winged  rain- 
bows of  colors,  scarab  or  lucanid  beetles,  the  gruesome  male  warriors,  bees  of  metallic  colors,  or 
orthopteroids  with  deceitful  forms  and  colors,  they  all  stand  in  a  fantastic  parade  that  captures  the 
reader's  interest.  The  book  contains  numerous  stories  about  insects,  in  a  style  reminiscent  of  Jean- 
Henri  Fabre,  the  great  French  naturalist  of  late  19th  early  20th  century.  Some  of  the  topics  covered 
in  the  book  include:  insects  and  humans  (Chapters  1  and  2);  morphology  (Chapter  5);  ecology 
(Chapters  9-10),  including  an  example  of  a  "carnivorous"  plant, Nepenthes,  defenses,  including  mim- 
icry (Chapter  12).  The  author  also  interweaves  remarks  on  life  histories,  biological  control,  sexual 
selection,  biogeography,  conservation  biology,  etc.  De  Tonnancour  beautifully  embroiders  a  wide 
range  of  entomological  topics  with  his  images,  yet  some  of  the  information  could  have  been 
improved  with  ease  by  consulting  major  serials  or  journals  that  review  entomology  regularly  (e.g. 
Annual  Review  of  Entomology,  Annual  Review  of  Ecologv  and  Systematics,  Trends  in  Ecology  and 
Evolution,  and  others).  Also,  the  reader  may  have  learned  more  if  the  author  would  have  included  ref- 
erences to  review  papers,  an  index,  and  an  expanded  glossary,  for  the  benefit  of  those  eager  to  learn 
more  about  these  Lilliputians,  as  well  as  some  photo  -  or  electron  micrographs  -  to  add  another  layer 
of  beauty.  We  enjoy  and  applaud  the  author's  efforts  of  highlighting  insects'  appeal  to  the  uninitiat- 
ed through  extraordinary  imagery  and  simple  prose.  Judging  from  some  of  their  colossal  scientific 
names  behind  these  generally  small  creatures,  a  reader  could  suspect  that  each  species  holds  a  large 
stand  of  equal  importance  in  the  world.  However,  the  readers  are  kept  engaged  by  the  interesting  nar- 
ratives of  the  lives  of  these  creatures  throughout  160  pages  of  text.  While  there  are  a  few  obvious 
mistakes,  perhaps  due  to  occasional  oversimplification,  and  a  remarkable  paucity  of  information  on 
topics,  such  as:  genetics  and  genetic  manipulations  of  insects,  speciation,  systematics,  applied  ento- 
mology, physiology,  and  paleoentomology,  to  name  a  few,  we  savored  this  book  with  gusto.  For  this 
relatively  inexpensive  volume  on  this  subject  (by  current  standards  for  a  well  constructed,  hard  cover 
book,  printed  on  glossy  paper),  we  consider  it  a  good  value,  an  elegant  addition  to  a  book  collection, 
and  a  delicious  liors  d'oeuvre  inviting  readers  to  devour  more  knowledge  about  the  insect  world. 


Lester  Humberto  Outline 
Montgomery  College 
Rockville,  Maryland  20850,  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  lestercito@hotmail.com 


Jorge  Alberto  Santiago-Blay 

National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 

Paleobiology 

Washington.  District  of  Columbia  20560.  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu 


Mailed  on  April  9,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  Book  Reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review  within  30  days.  The  Editor  reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manu- 
script to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcomed  to  list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  arti- 
cle should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  Editors  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  Editor  and  the  Business  Editor.  Then,  the 
proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  file,  together  with  the  reprint  order  form  as  .rtf 
file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  within  72  hours  and  return  them  to  the  Editor  and  to  the  Business 
Editor  by  air  mail  or  email  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to  provide 
forwarding  orders  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved  within  one 
week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  Editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the  printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  $25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  $30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  half-tones  at  the  rate  of  $30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  These 
charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004  United 
States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts.  There 
are  no  page  charges  for  Book  Reviews.  Page  and  reprints  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to 
whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is: 
3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  Email:  fbkuehntS'yahoo.com 

Articles  longer  than  13-16  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

II  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  They  will  be 
billed  in  advance  together  with  page  charges.  The  following  rates,  all  in  US  dollars,  apply. 

Reprints:  100  200  300  400  500 
Pages 

1  44  48  50  52  54 

2  46  50  52  54  56 

3  48  52  54  56  58 

4  50  54  56  58  60 

5  76  86  96  106  116 

6  78  88  98  108  118 

7  80  90  100  110  120 

8  82  92  102  112  122 
9-12  120  130  145  160  180 
13-16  160  170  185  200  220 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company.  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-1211;  fax  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132.  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recogni/ed  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600.  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road.  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48106-9866,  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


LETTER  FROM  THE  PRESIDENT  OF 
THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGY  SOCIETY1 

Dear  Entomological  News  subscriber: 

The  American  Entomological  Society  is  delighted  to  resume  publication  of  our 
journal,  Entomological  News.  We  are  also  pleased  to  announce  that  we  have  a 
new  Editor,  Dr.  Jorge  Santiago-Blay,  and  a  new  Business  Manager,  Dr.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Dr.  Santiago-Blay  is  a  Research  Associate  with  the  Departments  of 
Paleobiology  and  Entomology  at  the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
(Smithsonian  Institution)  in  Washington,  DC.  Dr.  Kuehn  is  the  Director  of  Plant 
Industries  in  the  Delaware  Department  of  Agriculture. 

We  regret  that  we  were  unable  to  publish  Entomological  News  during  2003 .  It 
is  our  intention  to  publish  five  issues  of  Entomological  News  with  the  volume 
number  1 14  and  the  year  2003  on  each  issue.  Then  we  will  begin  volume  num- 
ber 115  with  the  year  2004  on  each  issue.  We  hope  to  quickly  "catch  up."  Each 
paper  will  have  the  date  of  submission,  acceptance,  and  publication  printed  on 
the  first  page  of  that  paper. 

We  appreciate  the  loyal  subscribers  and  authors  who  have  supported  us  dur- 
ing this  difficult  period.  Thank  you. 

Sincerely, 


Susan  Whitney  King 

President, 

American  Entomological  Society 


Mailed  on  April  9.  2004 


Vol.  114 


USISSN  0013-872X 
MARCH  &  APRIL  2003  No.  2 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


"7  ^     >     ninished  food  resources  are  associated  with  delayed  reproduction  or 
^0  O  /      ncreased  post-reproductive  mortality  in  brood-bearing  terrestrial 

sopods  Armadillum  vulgare  Latreille       Scott  L.  Kight  and  Anaiseh  Hashemi     61 

Description  of  larva  and  new  host  plants  for  Anthonomus  rubricosus 
Boheman  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae)  from  Argentina 

Maria  S.  Loidcono,  Adriana  E.  Marvaldi,  and  Analia  A.  Lanteri     69 

A  key  to  the  genus  Phaedon  (Coleoptera:  Chrysomelidae)  from  China  and 

the  description  of  a  new  species       Si-qin  Ge,  Xlng-ke  Vang,  and  Jun-zhi  Cui     75 


Notes  on  Mexican  Psilopyga  and  Oxycnemus  (Coleoptera:  Nitidulidae) 

Jose  Luis  Navarrete-Heredia 


81 


New  Conopidae  from  the  Neotropical  region 


Sidney  Camras      86 


Two  additional  state  records  of  F,  male  interspecific  hybrids  Limenitis 
(Basilarchia)  spp.  from  "rubidus"  Strecker  (Lepidoptera:  Nymphalidae) 
for  the  U.S.A.  Austin  P.  Plan  and  E.  Thomas  McClanahan     91 

Cirrospilus  neotropicus  sp.  n.  (Hymenoptera:  Eulophidae):  An  indigenous 
biocontrol  agent  of  the  Citrus  Leafminer,  Phylocnistis  citrella  (Lepidoptera: 
Gracillariidae)  in  Argentina  Patricia  A.  Diez  and  Patricia  Fidalgo      98 

Peristenus  digoneutis  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae),  a  parasite  of  Lygus 
lineolaris  (Hemiptera:  Miridae)  in  northeastern  United  States  alfalfa,  and 
the  need  for  research  on  other  crops 

W.  H.  Day,  A.  T.  Eaton,  R.  F.  Romig,  K.  J.  Tilmon,  M.  Mayer,  and  T.  Dorsey    105 

Ditching  at  sea:  Predator  avoidance  by  the  Atlantic  marine  shoreline 
tiger  beetle,  Cicindela  marginata  F.  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) 

Foster  Forbes  Purrington    113 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE: 

First  Nearctic  Records  of  Tempisquitoneura  (Diptera:  Chironomidae: 
Orthocladiinae)  from  Arizona,  U.S.A. 

Gary  T.  Lester,  Brian  J.  Krestian,  and  John  H.  Epler    117 

BOOK  REVIEW: 

Natural  Enemies.  An  introduction  to  biological  control  by  Ann  Hajek 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay    120 

SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  OCTOBER  23,  2003  Jon  Gelhaus 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  JUNE  23,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1.0 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomologi- 
cal Society  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway.  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195.  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  email  aes@acnatsci.org;  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci.org/hosted/aes . 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  Members  of  the  Society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the 
USA  and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues,  when  available, 
are  sold  by  complete  volume  for  US  $15  to  Members  and  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  or  email  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  Editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray- Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890- 
1920  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-1961);  1945-1967  R.G. 
Schmieder(  1898- 1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974- 
2002  Howard  P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News:  Version  1.0. 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  Into.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author  although  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all 
prospective  authors  join  the  society. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  Editor:  Address. 

All  manuscripts,  including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomol- 
ogical News  as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A. 
Santiago-Blay  at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012 
U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.O.  Box,  please  use 
this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other 
means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  phone  (202)  786-2876,  Fax  (202)  786-2832,  web  page 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.htm.  e-mails  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu  or 
blayj@hotmail.com.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  Editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them 
to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  original 
artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  type  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for 
the  Acknowledgments  and  the  Literature  Cited. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 6_1_ 

vJl  f  2  2004 

DIMINISHED  FOOD  RESOURCES  ARE  ASSOCIATED 
WITH  DELAYED  REPRODUCTION  OR  INCREASED 

POST-REPRODUCTIVE  MORTALITY  IN 

BROOD-BEARING  TERRESTRIAL  ISOPODS 

ARMADILLIDIUM  VULGARE  LATREILLE1 

Scott  L.  Right2  and  Anaiseh  Hashemi' 

ABSTRACT:  Female  terrestrial  isopods  (Crustacea:  Oniscidea)  carry  eggs  and  early  instars  in  a  ven- 
tral brood  pouch.  We  investigated  reproductive  expenditure  of  female  Armadillidium  vulgare 
Latreille  under  the  condition  of  restricted  food  resources.  Regardless  of  food  availability,  few  cases 
of  spontaneous  termination  of  care  were  observed  and  most  gravid  females  either  successfully  pro- 
duced offspring  or  died  while  still  bearing  eggs.  There  were  no  differences  in  pre-hatching  maternal 
mortality  between  food-restricted  and  non-restricted  groups,  but  females  exhibited  significantly  high- 
er post-reproductive  mortality  when  food  availability  was  heavily  reduced  after  oogenesis.  This  did 
not  occur  when  food  was  restricted  prior  to  oogenesis,  but  in  this  case  females  delayed  the  onset  of 
reproduction.  An  association  between  mortality  and  past  reproduction  was  further  supported  by  high 
laboratory  mortality,  regardless  of  food  availability,  in  non-gravid  females  field-captured  late  in  the 
reproductive  season.  Maternal  investment  in  A.  vulgare  thus  appears  to  be  energetically  expensive. 
Despite  the  ability  to  terminate  care,  however,  females  continue  to  invest  heavily  in  reproduction 
even  when  resources  are  scarce  and  the  likelihood  of  mortality  is  high. 

KEY  WORDS:  Armadillwn  vulgare,  Isopoda,  diminished  food  resources,  delayed  reproduction, 
post-reproductive  mortality,  brood-rearing. 

The  evolutionary  significance  of  arthropod  parental  care  has  been  reviewed 
elsewhere  (Tallamy  1984;  Tallamy  and  Wood  1986;  Kaitala  and  Mappes  1992), 
but  studies  of  the  phenomenon  are  generally  limited  to  the  Insecta  where  it  has 
independently  evolved  in  several  taxa.  Subsocial  behavior,  however,  also 
evolved  in  the  Crustacea  and  can  be  readily  observed  in  the  terrestrial  Isopoda 
(e.g.  Linsenmair  1987).  Unlike  the  majority  of  subsocial  insects,  which  general- 
ly brood  eggs  deposited  on  external  surfaces,  a  female  terrestrial  isopod  bears 
eggs  and  early-instar  young  (manca)  in  a  ventral  marsupium  (a  fluid-filled  pouch 
formed  by  oostegites  on  the  ventral  pereon).  This  places  a  number  of  unique  con- 
straints upon  the  reproductive  success  of  female  terrestrial  isopods,  including 
physical  demands  on  locomotion  (Kight  and  Ozga  2001)  and  spatial  limits  on 
fecundity  (Tomescu  et  al.  1992;  Dangerfield  and  Telford  1995). 

Because  reproductive  success  is  constrained  by  egg-bearing,  terrestrial 
isopods  may  have  evolved  behavioral  or  physiological  plasticity  in  the  face  of 
changing  environmental  conditions.  To  optimize  reproductive  success,  female 
isopods  should  alter  the  magnitude  of  parental  investment  depending  on  the 
availability  of  resources  such  as  food  and  favorable  habitats.  For  example.  Rush- 
ton  and  Hassall  (1983)  observed  that  female  Annadillulinm  vulgare  Latreille 


1  Received  on  September  16,  2002.  Accepted  on  December  1 1 .  2003. 

-'Department  of  Biology  and  Molecular  Biology,  Montclair  State  University,  Upper  Montclair,  NJ 
07043,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  kights@mail.montclair.edu. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  114  (2):  61 .  March  &  April  2003 
Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


62  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


reared  on  different  food  sources  exhibited  differences  in  fecundity.  Isopod  fecun- 
dity can  also  be  negatively  affected  by  competition  among  individuals  for  limit- 
ed resources  (Hassall  and  Dangerfield  1997). 

The  present  study  examines  the  reproductive  biology  of  female  A.  vulgare 
under  limited  food  resources.  We  first  investigate  the  spontaneous  termination  of 
care  and  patterns  of  mortality  in  food-restricted  females  during  the  first  repro- 
ductive episode  of  the  season  (reproduction  is  seasonal  in  temperate  climates 
(Souty-Grosset  et  al.  1998).  Gravid  females  may  respond  to  food  restriction  in 
three  possible  ways:  an  increase  of  parental  investment  in  the  face  of  diminished 
resources,  reduction  (including  termination)  of  investment,  or  no  change  in  pat- 
terns of  investment  at  all. 

We  next  examine  post-reproductive  responses  to  food  stress  in  females  cap- 
tured at  the  end  of  the  reproductive  season.  Three  alternative  hypotheses  may 
again  be  considered.  If  the  act  of  brood  bearing  places  burdens  on  maternal  ex- 
penditure only  in  the  short-term,  post-reproductive,  food-restricted  females 
should  have  lower  mortality  than  reproductive  food-restricted  females.  Alterna- 
tively, if  brood  bearing  reduces  long-term  residual  reproductive  potential,  post- 
reproductive,  food-restricted  females  are  expected  to  suffer  similar  or  even  great- 
er mortality  than  gravid  food-restricted  females.  Finally,  brood  bearing  may  have 
no  effect  on  mortality  and  post-reproductive  females  should  not  differ  from 
reproductive  females. 

Finally,  we  test  the  hypothesis  that  females  exposed  to  food  stress  prior  to  the 
first  reproductive  episode  will  respond  differently  than  females  stressed  only 
after  oogenesis.  If  limited  food  resources  constrain  oogenesis  and  the  onset  of  re- 
production, pre-reproductive  females  should  reduce  or  delay  investment.  There 
are  two  additional  alternatives:  food-restricted,  pre-reproductive  females  could 
increase  investment  (although  this  seems  unlikely)  or  exhibit  unaltered  patterns 
of  reproductive  allocation. 

METHODS  I 
FOOD  RESTRICTION  DURING  THE  BROODING  PHASE 

Armadillidium  vulgare  Latreille  were  hand-collected  twice  during  the  repro- 
ductive season  of  2001  in  Essex  County,  New  Jersey,  USA.  The  first  sample  was 
taken  during  early  May,  whereas  the  second  sample  was  obtained  in  late  August. 
Animals  were  collected  from  the  same  location  in  both  cases  and  therefore  our 
samples  are  presumed  to  be  from  a  single  population.  Collected  animals  were 
returned  to  the  laboratory  and  maintained  at  21°C  and  a  15L:9D  light/dark 
photocycle  in  ventilated  plastic  enclosures  containing  moist  cellulose  sponge  and 
carrots  administered  ad  libitum. 

Upon  evidence  of  egg-bearing  (determined  by  visual  inspection),  females  in 
the  May  sample  were  isolated  in  individual  Drosophila  culture  vials  and  divided 
into  three  treatment  groups  by  matched  triads  according  to  estimated  body  size. 
Control  females  were  provided  unlimited  access  to  carrots  throughout  the  exper- 


Vol.  114.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 63_ 

iment.  The  second  group  was  moderately  food  restricted  by  a  feeding  cycle  in 
which  carrots  were  provided  for  four  consecutive  days  followed  by  removal  of 
food  for  two  days.  The  third  group  was  heavily  food  restricted  by  a  feeding  cycle 
in  which  carrots  were  provided  for  two  consecutive  days  followed  by  removal  of 
food  for  four  days.  Each  treatment  group  contained  30  females  and  was  moni- 
tored for  17  days.  During  this  period  females  were  examined  daily  for  either  the 
continued  presence  of  eggs,  the  occurrence  of  spontaneous  termination  of  care, 
or  the  death  of  the  subject. 

Females  from  the  August  sample  did  not  reproduce  in  the  laboratory. 
Specimens  were  isolated  into  individual  Drosophila  culture  vials  and  divided 
into  two  treatment  groups  by  matched  pairs  according  to  estimated  body  size. 
Control  females  were  provided  unlimited  access  to  carrots  while  the  second 
group  was  heavily  food  restricted  as  described.  Each  treatment  group  contained 
30  females  examined  daily  for  mortality  over  a  period  of  17  days. 

RESULTS  I 
FOOD  RESTRICTION  DURING  THE  BROODING  PHASE 

Data  were  analyzed  following  Gravetter  and  Wallnau  (1988)  using  Statistix 
v.2.0  statistical  software  with  a  =  0.05. 

Few  cases  of  spontaneous  termination  of  care  were  observed,  regardless  of 
experimental  treatment.  Three  control  females,  two  moderately  restricted  and 
five  heavily  restricted  females  changed  from  an  obvious  gravid  state  to  a  non- 
gravid  state  over  the  course  of  the  study  (N  =  90,  x2  =  1 .575,  DF  =  2,  P  =  0.4550). 
In  most  cases  the  mechanism  of  termination  was  unknown,  although  we  occa- 
sionally observed  terminating  females  with  eggs  protruding  from  the  marsupium 
and  in  some  cases  even  feeding  upon  the  eggs. 

In  the  remaining  reproductive  females  there  were  no  differences  among  treat- 
ment groups  in  pre-hatching  maternal  mortality.  Two  control  females,  four  mod- 
erately restricted  and  six  heavily  restricted  females  died  without  hatching  young 
(N  =  80,  x2  =  2.820,  DF  =  2,  P  =  0.2441).  There  was,  however,  significantly 
higher  post-reproductive  mortality  in  the  heavily  restricted  treatment  group 
(Fig.  1)  during  the  observation  period  (N  =  68,  x2  =  15.67,  DF  =  2,  P  =  0.0004). 
Fifteen  heavily  restricted  females  died  shortly  after  the  appearance  of  offspring, 
whereas  this  occurred  in  only  6  control  and  7  moderately  restricted  females. 

Mortality  was  also  high  in  the  presumably  post-reproductive  females  cap- 
tured in  August.  There  were,  however,  no  differences  between  the  two  late-sea- 
son, treatment  groups:  17  control  females  and  23  food-restricted  females  died 
during  the  study  period  (N  =60,  x2  =  2.70,  DF  =  1 ,  P  =  0.1000).  While  the  late- 
season,  food-restricted  females  did  not  differ  from  early-season  reproductive 
food-restricted  females  in  overall  mortality  (N  =  60,  x2  =  0.34,  DF  =  1,  P  = 
0.5000),  overall  mortality  was  significantly  higher  in  late-season  controls  than 
in  early-season  reproductive  controls  (N  =  60,  x2  =  5.55,  DF  =  1 ,  P  =  0.0200). 


64 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


t: 

o 


a 


pre-hatch 
post-hatch 


Control        Moderate 


Food  Restriction 


Heavy 


Figure  1.  Percent  pre-hatching  (clear  bars)  and  post-hatching  (black  bars)  mortality  in 
unrestricted  (control)  and  moderately/heavily  food-restricted  reproductive  females. 
Numbers  over  bars  are  frequency/total  for  each  group. 


METHODS  II:  PRE-REPRODUCTIVE  FOOD  RESTRICTION 

The  previous  experiments  were  characterized  by  two  patterns.  First,  heavy 
food  restriction  during  reproduction  was  associated  with  high  maternal  mortali- 
ty following  the  appearance  of  offspring.  Second,  females  that  presumably  repro- 
duced at  least  once  suffered  high  mortality  even  when  food  was  plentiful.  It 
seems  unrealistic,  however,  that  food  resources  would  suddenly  disappear  under 
natural  conditions.  Hence  a  more  biologically  meaningful  experiment  would 
involve  food  restriction  prior  to  the  onset  of  reproduction. 

A.  vulgare  were  again  hand-collected  in  early  May  of  2002  in  Essex  County, 
New  Jersey,  USA.  Pre-experimental  treatment  of  animals  was  identical  to  that  of 
the  previous  year  with  the  following  exceptions.  First,  only  two  experimental 
groups  were  constructed:  control  females  with  unlimited  access  to  carrots 
throughout  the  experiment  and  heavily  food-restricted  females  treated  with  a 
feeding  cycle  of  two  days  access  to  food  followed  by  four  days  without  food. 
Second,  food-restricted  females  were  placed  on  this  feeding  cycle  immediately 
after  capture.  Hence  these  females  experienced  diminished  food  resources  prior 
to  the  first  reproductive  episode  of  the  season. 


Vol.  1  14.  No.  2.  March  &  Apnl  2003 


We  collected  106  females  and  divided  them  into  the  two  treatment  groups  by 
matched  pairs  according  to  estimated  body  size.  Upon  evidence  of  egg  bearing 
(determined  by  visual  inspection),  females  were  isolated  into  individual 
Drosophila  culture  vials.  Females  were  examined  daily  for  the  continued  pres- 
ence of  eggs,  the  occurrence  of  spontaneous  termination  of  care,  or  the  death  of 
the  subject.  We  also  estimated  fecundity  as  the  number  of  young  to  emerge  from 
the  marsupium  in  successful  females.  Observations  ended  43  days  after  the 
experiment  began,  when  all  females  that  reproduced  had  either  successfully 
hatched  young  or  died  prior  to  hatching. 

RESULTS  II 
PRE-REPRODUCTIVE  FOOD  RESTRICTION 

There  were  no  differences  in  the  occurrence  of  oogenesis  between  treatment 
groups.  Of  the  53  control  females.  28  became  gravid,  whereas  21  of  53  food- 
restricted  females  became  gravid  (N  =  106.  x  2  =  1.86.  DF  =  1.  P  =  0.1727). 
There  were  also  no  differences  in  pre-hatching  or  post-hatching  maternal  mor- 
tality. Seven  control  and  three  restricted  females  died  without  hatching  young  (N 
=  49.  x  2  =  0.85.  DF  =  1.  P  =  0.3571)  and  nine  control  and  seven  restricted 
females  died  after  the  young  hatched  (N  =  39.  x  2  =  0.06.  DF  =  1  .  P  =  0.8017). 
There  were  also  no  differences  observed  in  fecundity,  with  control  females  pro- 
ducing an  average  of  20.19  hatched  offspring  (SE  =  2.107)  and  restricted  females 
producing  an  average  of  20.28  (SE  =  2.181)  (T-test.  N  =  49.  T  =  0.03.  P  = 
0.9773). 

There  was  a  statistical  trend,  however,  for  control  females  to  initiate  repro- 
duction earlier  than  food-restricted  females  (Fig.  2).  Control  females  became  vis- 
ibly gravid  after  an  average  of  9.79  days  (SE  =  1.713).  while  this  occurred  in 
food-restricted  females  after  an  average  of  14.81  days  (SE  =  2.374)  (T-test.  N  = 
49.  T=  1  .  76.  P  =  0.0846). 

DISCUSSION 

Perhaps  the  most  interesting  outcome  of  this  study  was  that  while  females 
appeared  capable  of  terminating  post-embryonic  maternal  investment,  they  only 
did  so  with  low  frequency  and  without  obvious  pattern.  In  several  insect  tu\u. 
spontaneous  termination  of  care  is  an  active  reproductive  strategy  (Coleoptera: 
Silphidae.  Scott  and  Gladstein  1993:  Heteroptera:  Cydnidae.  Right  1997:  Hete- 
roptera:  Belostomatidae.  Kight  et  al.  2000).  In  the  present  study,  however,  only  a 
few  cases  of  reversal  from  gravid  to  non-gravid  condition  were  observed  in  all 
treatment  groups,  regardless  of  food  availability.  This  might  be  expected  if  most 
females  were  nearing  senescence.  However,  this  seems  unlikely  because  terrestri- 
al isopods  survive  and  reproduce  across  multiple  years  and  samples  most  likely 
contained  females  from  a  range  of  ages  and  reproductive  histories.  We  must  there- 
fore conclude  that  either  active  termination  of  care  has  not  evolved  as  a  repro- 
ductive strategy  in  A.  vulgare,  or  that  diminished  food  resources  are  insufficient 


66 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ca 

'S 
<u 

c 

0> 

OJQ 

O 

O 


PQ 

GO 
>> 

03 

Q 

c 


20 


15- 


10- 


5- 


0 


T 


T 


1 


I 


Control 


Heavy 


Food  Restriction 

Figure  2.  Average  time  (days)  between  capture  and  oogenesis  in  unrestricted  (control) 
and  heavily  food-restricted  reproductive  females.  Error  bars  represent  standard  error  on 
the  mean. 


to  elicit  the  response.  The  latter  might  be  expected  if  food  resources  are  rarely 
limited  under  natural  conditions,  but  we  have  no  data  to  address  this  hypothesis. 

The  most  obvious  effect  of  food  restriction  was  seen  in  the  relatively  high 
post-reproductive  mortality  of  females  that  were  heavily  food-restricted  after 
oogenesis.  Rather  than  terminate  investment  in  the  face  of  diminished  resources, 
these  females  appeared  to  expend  reserves  that  might  otherwise  have  been  used 
for  post-reproductive  maintenance  and  survival. 

It  is  interesting  that  late-season  females  exhibited  high  mortality  rates  regard- 
less of  food  availability.  These  females  had  presumably  reproduced  at  least  once 
prior  to  capture,  and  perhaps  multiple  times.  Souty-Grosset  et  al.  (1988)  ob- 
served three  parturial  molts  in  some  populations  of  A.  vulgare.  Late-season  fe- 
males may  therefore  have  had  low  reserves  for  somatic  maintenance  and  sur- 
vival. This  hypothesis  is  supported  by  the  low  overall  mortality  of  early-season 
reproductive  controls  relative  to  late-season  controls.  It  should  be  noted,  howev- 
er, that  this  difference  is  also  consistent  with  age-related  increases  in  mortality. 
These  are  not  mutually  exclusive  hypotheses  and  could  potentially  have  an  addi- 
tive effect  on  mortality. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 67_ 

In  contrast,  when  food  restriction  was  applied  prior  to  oogenesis  the  overall 
mortality  of  food-restricted  females  diminished  to  a  level  not  different  from 
reproductive  controls.  This  could  be  an  adaptive  outcome  of  the  delay  with 
which  food-restricted  females  began  reproduction.  For  example,  females  facing 
diminished  resources  may  have  physiologically  adapted  or  behaviorally  com- 
pensated prior  to  oogenesis,  either  by  eating  more  food  when  it  was  available, 
producing  smaller  eggs,  etc.  Although  our  data  do  not  address  these  hypotheses, 
we  may  reasonably  rule  out  an  adjustment  in  fecundity,  which  was  not  different 
between  treatment  groups  at  the  time  of  offspring  dispersal. 

The  tendency  of  food-restricted  females  to  delay  oogenesis,  which  we  discov- 
ered only  after  the  experiment  ended,  exposed  an  experimental  design  difficulty 
for  the  second  year  of  the  study.  Because  restricted  females  delayed  reproduc- 
tion, the  portion  of  the  observation  period  in  which  they  were  classified  as  post- 
reproductive  was  shorter  than  that  of  control  females.  This  may  have  inflated  the 
measure  of  post-reproductive  mortality  in  control  females.  The  alternative  would 
have  been  to  observe  all  females  for  some  standard  length  of  time  after  the  hatch- 
ing of  young,  but  this  could  have  inflated  the  measure  of  post-reproductive  mor- 
tality in  food-restricted  females  because  they  would  have  been  older.  Hence  we 
must  caution  that  our  data  provide  a  very  conservative  estimate  of  post-repro- 
ductive mortality  in  females  that  are  food  restricted  prior  to  oogenesis. 

We  may  reasonably  conclude  that  brood  bearing  in  female  A.  vulgare  is  ener- 
getically expensive.  This  expense  appears  to  be  met  through  increased  post- 
reproductive  mortality  when  food  resources  are  limited  after  oogenesis  or  in 
delayed  reproduction  when  food  is  scarce  prior  to  oogenesis.  Although  active  ter- 
mination of  care  does  not  appear  to  be  an  important  part  of  reproductive  behav- 
ior in  this  species,  reduced  mortality  suggests  that  delaying  reproduction  may  be 
an  effective  strategy  for  maximizing  reproductive  success  when  food  resources 
are  limited. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

This  research  was  supported  by  a  National  Science  Foundation  CCLI  award  to  SLK.  Further  sup- 
port was  provided  by  a  Montclair  State  University  FSIP  award  to  SLK. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Dangerfield,  J.  M.  and  S.  R.  Telford.  1995.  Tactics  of  reproduction  and  reproductive  allocation  in 
four  species  of  woodlice  from  southern  Africa.  Journal  of  Tropical  Ecology  1 1:641-649. 

Gravetter,  F.  J.  and  L.  B.  Wallnau.  1988.  Statistics  for  the  Behavioral  Sciences.  Second  Edition. 
West  Publishing  Company.  New  York.  455  pp. 

Hassall,  M.  and  J.  M.  Dangerfield.  1997.  The  population  dynamics  of  a  woodlouse,  Armadilli- 
dium  vulgare:  An  example  of  biotic  compensatory  mechanisms  amongst  terrestrial  macrodecom- 
posers?  Pedobiologia  41:342-360. 


68  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Kaitala,  A.  and  J.  Mappes.  1992.  Evolution  of  parental  care  in  insects.  Luonnon  Tutkija  96:158- 
162. 

Kight,  S.  L.  1997.  Factors  influencing  maternal  behavior  in  a  burrower  bug,  Sehirus  cinctus  (Hete- 
roptera:  Cydnidae).  Animal  Behavior  53:105-112. 

Kight,  S.  L.,  M.  Batino,  and  Z.  Zhang.  2000.  Temperature-dependent  parental  investment  in  the 
giant  waterbug,Belostomaflitmineum  (Heteroptera:  Belostomatidae).  Annals  of  the  Entomologi- 
cal Society  of  America  93:340-342. 

Kight,  S.  L.  and  M.  Ozga.  2001.  Costs  of  reproduction  in  the  terrestrial  isopod  Porcellio  laevis 
Latreille  (Isopoda:  Oniscidea):  Brood-bearing  and  locomotion.  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomolog- 
ical Society  74:166-171. 

Linsenmair,  K.  E.  1987.  Kin  recognition  in  subsocial  arthropods,  in  particular  in  the  desert  isopod 
Hemilepistus  reaitmuri.  pp!21-208.  In,  Kin  Recognition  in  Animals.  D.  J.  C.  Fletcher  and  C.  D. 
Michener,  Editors.  John  Wiley.  Chichester,  New  York.  476  pp 

Rushton,  S.  P.  and  M.  Hassall.  1983.  The  effects  of  food  quality  on  the  life  history  parameters  of 
the  terrestrial  isopod  (Armadillidium  vulgare).  Oecologia  57:257-261. 

Scott,  M.  P.  and  D.  S.  Gladstein.  1993.  Calculating  males?  An  empirical  and  theoretical  examina- 
tion of  the  duration  of  paternal  care  in  burying  beetles.  Evolutionary  Ecology  7:362-378. 

Souty-Grosset,  C.,  A.  Chentoufi,  J.  P.  Mocquard,  and  P.  Juchault.  1988.  Seasonal  reproduction 
in  the  terrestrial  isopod  Armadillidium  vulgare  (Latreille):  Geographical  variability  and  genetic 
control  of  the  response  to  photoperiod  and  temperature.  International  Journal  of  Invertebrate  Re- 
production and  Development  14: 13 1-152. 

Souty-Grosset,  C.,  K.  Nasri,  J.  P.  Mocquard,  and  P.  Juchault.  1998.  Individual  variation  in  the 
seasonal  reproduction  of  the  terrestrial  isopod  Armadillidium  vulgare  Latr.  (Crustacea,  Onis- 
cidea). Acta  Oecologica  19:367-375. 

Tallamy,  D.  W.  1984.  Insect  parental  care.  Bioscience  34:20-24. 

Tallamy,  D.  W.  and  T.  K.  Wood.  1986.  Convergence  patterns  in  subsocial  insects.  Annual  Review 
of  Entomology  31:369-390. 

Tomescu,  N.,  S.  Accola,  and  C.  Berciu.  1992.  Reproduction  of  terrestrial  isopods  of  Cheile  Turzii 
natural  reservation  (Romania).  Studia  Universitatia  Babes-Bolyai  37:39-45. 


Vol.  114.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 69 

DESCRIPTION  OF  LARVA  AND  NEW  HOST  PLANTS 

FOR  ANTHONOMUS  RUBRICOSUS  BOHEMAN 
(COLEOPTERA:  CURCULIONIDAE)  IN  ARGENTINA1 

Marta  S.  Loiacono,2  Adriana  E.  Marvaldi,'  and  Anali'a  A.  Lanterr 

ABSTRACT:  The  main  purposes  of  this  paper  are  to  describe  the  larva  of  Anthonomus  rubricosus 
Boheman  (Curculionidae:  Anthonomini)  and  to  provide  new  information  on  its  host  plants.  The 
species  is  similar  to  Anthonomus  vestinis  Boheman,  based  on  the  presence  of  four  epipharyngeal  sen- 
silla  arranged  in  a  single  cluster  and  the  labial  palpus  one-segmented.  It  differs  by  its  smaller  body 
size  (about  2  mm),  basal  segment  of  maxillary  palpus  shorter  than  apical  segment,  and  premental 
sclerite  with  posterior  extension  shorter  than  anteromedian  extension.  Teneral  adults,  larvae  and  a 
pupal  exuvia  of  A.  rubricosus,  the  latter  along  with  a  parasitoid  (Pteromalidae),  were  found  inside 
flowers  of  Hibiscus  rosasinensis  L.  and  fruits  of  Pavonia  sp.  (Malvaceae),  in  Misiones  Province,  Ar- 
gentina. 

KEYWORDS:  Anthonomus  rubricosus,  Coleoptera,  Curculionidae,  larva,  host  plants,  Argentina. 

As  a  consequence  of  a  survey  of  alternative  host  plants  of  Anthonomus  gran- 
dis  Boheman  in  Misiones  Province,  Argentina,  we  have  found  weevil  larvae 
inside  flowers,  flower  buds  and  fruits  of  two  species  of  Malvaceae.  Based  on  as- 
sociation with  teneral  adult  specimens,  some  of  these  larvae  were  assigned  to 
Anthonomus  rubricosus  Boheman,  a  species  recorded  as  harmful  to  cotton  in  Ar- 
gentina and  Brazil  (Bosq  1943,  Silva  et  al.  1968,  Lanteri  et  al.  2002).  The  main 
purposes  of  this  paper  are  to  describe  the  larva  of  Anthonomus  rubricosus  and  to 
provide  new  information  on  its  host  plants. 

METHODS 

Field  work  to  collect  Malvaceae  that  would  serve  as  alternate  hosts  of  weevils 
harmful  to  cotton,  was  done  in  Misiones  Province,  Departments  of  Iguazii,  Eldo- 
rado, San  Ignacio  and  San  Javier,  along  the  Parana  and  Uruguay  rivers,  during 
February  2001.  Several  samples  of  the  following  species  were  examined: 
Malvastrum  coromandelianum  (L.)  Garcke,  Pavonia  sepium  St.  Hil.,  Pavonia 
sp.,  Pseudabutilon  sp.,  Sida  rhombifolia  L.,  Sida  spinosa  L.,  Hibiscus  mutabilis 
L.,  H.  rosasinensis  L.,  H.  schizopetalus  Hook.f.,  H.  syriacus  L.  and  Hibiscus  sp. 
Samples  of  reproductive  structures  of  these  plants  were  dissected  under  a  stereo- 
scopic microscope  to  look  for  weevil  specimens  inside. 

Techniques  for  preservation,  dissection  and  illustration  of  the  larva,  follow 
May  (1977,  1979,  1993).  The  terminology  used  in  the  description  is  according  to 
Marvaldi  (1999).  Drawings  were  done  with  a  camera  lucida  adapted  to  a  com- 
pound microscope.  Adult  voucher  specimens  and  larvae  (slide  mounted)  are 


1  Received  on  August  28,  2002.  Accepted  on  Februray  4,  2004. 

-'Division  Entomologia,  Museo  de  La  Plata,  Paseo  del  Bosque,  1900  La  Plata,  Argentina.  E-mail: 
loiacono@museo.fcnym.unlp.edu .ar;  alanteri@museo.fcnym. unlp.edu .ar. 

'Institute  Argentine  de  Investigaciones  de  las  Zonas  Aridas  (IADIZA-CRICYT),  C.  C.  507,  5500 
Mendoza,  Argentina.  E-mail:  marvaldi@lab.cricyt.edu.ar. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


70  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


deposited  at  the  entomological  collection  of  the  Museo  de  La  Plata  (MLP). 
Teneral  adults  taken  from  reproductive  structures  of  Malvaceae,  along  with  lar- 
vae, were  identified  by  comparison  with  adult  specimens  of  A.  rubricosus  housed 
at  the  MLP  collection. 

RESULTS 

Several  weevil  larvae  were  found  inside  reproductive  structures  of  two  species 
of  Malvaceae  from  Misiones  Province.  Larvae  about  5  mm  long,  collected  inside 
fruits  of  Malvastrum  coromandelianum  and  Pseudabutilon  sp.,  in  Eldorado  and 
San  Javier  Departments,  were  assigned  to  Curculioninae  in  the  broad  sense 
(Alonso-Zarazaga  &  Lyal  1999)  but  in  the  absence  of  associated  adults  it  was  not 
possible  to  identify  them  further.  They  do  not  belong  to  Anthonornus  grandis, 
neither  can  they  be  assigned  to  the  tribe  Anthonomini,  since  they  have  a  frontal 
seta  2  present,  six  epipharingeal  sensilla  arranged  in  two  clusters  of  three  sensil- 
la  in  each,  and  a  terminal  anus. 

Small  larvae  (about  2. mm  long)  along  with  teneral  adults,  found  inside  flow- 
ers of  Hibiscus  rosasinensis  L.  and  fruits  of  Pavonia  sp,  in  Iguazii  Department, 
were  identified  as  Anthonornus  rubricosus  Boheman  (Fig.  1). 

A  partially  destroyed  exuvia  of  one  pupa  was  collected  along  with  one  female 
of  Pteromalidae,  Chalcidoidea,  inside  fruits  of  Pavonia  sp.,  in  Teyii  Cuare,  San 
Ignacio  Department,  15-02-2001.  This  exuvia  apparently  belongs  to  A.  rubrico- 
sus, and  we  believe  that  the  pupa  was  killed  by  the  parasitoid. 

Taxonomic  information  on  Anthonornus  rubricosus  Boheman 

Anthonomus  rubricosus  Boheman  1859  (=  A.  campinas  Marshall  1938)  is 
probably  related  to  A.  vestitus  Boheman,  distributed  in  Peru  and  Ecuador,  and  to 
other  members  of  the  genus  assigned  to  the  squarnosus  group  of  Dietz,  such  as 
A.  bisinuatus  Burke  &  Cross,  from  Colombia,  and  A.  testaceosquamosus  Linell, 
from  southern  Texas  and  northeastern  Mexico  (Burke  &  Cross  1966,  Ahmad  & 
Burke  1972).  All  these  species  have  Malvaceae  as  hosts.  Anthonomus  grandis 
and  other  members  of  the  grandis  group  also  have  several  Malvaceae  as  hosts 
(Burke  &  Gate  1983,  Burke  et  al.  1984;  Jones  &  Burke  1997),  but  are  probably 
less  closely  related  to  A.  rubricosus  (Clark  pers.  com.).  A  redescription  of  A.  ru- 
bricosus based  on  adult  characters  is  needed,  but  we  consider  that  it  would  be 
better  to  do  that  in  the  context  of  a  taxonomic  revision  of  the  genus  Anthonomus. 

Geographic  range.  Argentina,  Bolivia  and  Brazil.  Within  Argentina,  A.  rubri- 
cosus is  distributed  throughout  the  provinces  of  Buenos  Aires,  Chaco,  Corrientes, 
Entre  Rios,  Misiones,  Salta,  Santiago  del  Estero  and  Tucuman. 

Host  plants.  Weevils  of  the  tribe  Anthonomini  are  first  grade  oligophagous, 
regarding  host  selection.  The  hosts  of  each  of  the  weevil  species  are  confined  to 
a  single  plant  family  and  sometimes  to  one  plant  genus  (Burke  1976).  The  know- 
ledge of  plant  associations  is  very  important  to  clarify  the  phylogenetic  relation- 
ships within  the  tribe  and  to  predict  which  species  could  be  harmful  for  crops 
(Lanteri  etal.  2002). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


71 


Fig.  1.  Teneral  adult  of  Anthonomus  rubricosus  inside  a  flower  bud  of  Hibiscus  rosasi- 
nensis  (Malvaceae). 


Previously,  the  known  hosts  for  A.  rubricosus  in  Argentina  were  Sphaeralcea 
sp.  and  Gossypium  hirsutum  L.  (Lanteri  et  al.  2002).  Herein  we  add  Pavonia  sp. 
and  Hibiscus  rosasinensis  L.  This  weevil  has  caused  severe  damage  to  young 
cotton  plants  in  Chaco,  Argentina  (Bosq  1943,  Denier  1939),  and  Sao  Paulo,  Bra- 
zil (Silva  et  al.  1968). 

Species  related  to  A.  rubricosus  and  their  known  host-plants  are  as  follows: 
1)  Anthonomus  vestitus:  Gossypium  raimondii  Ulbr.,  Gossypium  hirsutum  L., 
Cienfuegosia  heterophylla  Garcke,  Hibiscus  rosasinensis  L.,  Althea  rosea  (L.) 
Cav.,  and  Sida  paniculata  L.;  2)  Anthonomus  bisinuatus:  Hibiscus  sp.  and  Gos- 
sypium hirsutum  L.;  3)  Anthonomus  testaceosquamosus:  Hibiscus,  Sida,  Abuti- 
lon,  and  Pseudabutilon,  but  this  species  does  not  attack  cotton  (Burke  &  Cross 

1966,  Ahmad  &  Burke  1972). 

Material  examined.  ARGENTINA:  Corrientes:  08-1934  (1  MLP);  San  Roquc.  02-1920  (7 
MLP);  Colonia  San  Antonio,  Dep.  San  Miguel,  2002,  10  ex.  collected  on  pheromone  trap  close  to 
cotton  fields.  Entre  Rios:  Concordia,  02-  1996  (3  MLP).  Misiones:  Pindapoy,  10-1935  (1  MLP); 
Loreto,  04-1996  (7  MLP);  Puerto  Libertad,  Dep.  Iguazii,  12-02-2001,  1  teneral  adult,  in  flowers  of 
Hibiscus  rosasinensis  L.;  Destacamento  Ecolacustre  Lago  Uruguaf,  12-02-2001 ,  1  teneral  adult  along 
with  larvae,  in  fruits  of  Pavonia  sp.  Chaco:  Resistencia  (1  MLP).  Salta:  Oran,  09-1939  (1  MLP). 

Mature  larva  of  Anthonomus  rubricosus 

Body  length  1.5-2.0  mm.  Head  width  0.5  mm.  Head  capsule  subcircular;  stemmata  (ocelli)  pig- 
mented  before  clearing  with  KOH.  anterior  stemina  black,  conspicuous,  with  convex  cornea,  poste- 
rior stemma  hardly  distinct,  as  small  brown  spot.  Antenna  (Fig.  2)  with  basal  article  bearing  elongate- 
conical  sensorium  and  six  minute  sensorial  structures,  one  rounded  and  five  elongate  (one  distinctly 
longer  than  others).  Endocarina  (Fig.  2)  about  2/3  as  long  as  Irons.  Frontal  seta  1  and  3  very  short, 
setae  4  and  5  long,  subequal  (Fig.  2).  Dorsal  epicranial  seta  1  slightly  longer  than  seta  2,  setae  3  and 


72 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  2-4.  Larva  of  Anthonomus  rubricosus.  2)  Clypeus,  labrum  and  frontal  area  of  head, 
dorsal;  3)  epipharynx;  4)  mandible.  Scales  =  0.1  mm. 


5  longer  than  the  others,  seta  4  minute;  dorsal  epicranial  seta  3  located  closer  to  frontal  line  than  seta 
1.  Lateral  epicranial  seta  1  about  1/2  as  long  as  2.  Clypeal  setae  short,  close  to  anterior  margin  of 
frons  (Fig.  2).  Labral  setae  1  and  2  subequal  in  length,  seta  3  short,  less  than  1/3  as  long  as  seta  2 
(Fig.  2).  Epipharynx  (Fig.  3)  with  three  anterolateral  setae  on  each  side;  four  epipharyngeal  sensilla 
(sensory  pores)  arranged  in  single  median  cluster;  labral  rods  subparallel,  slightly  converging  poste- 
riorly, not  reaching  base  of  clypeus.  Mandibular  setae  1  and  2  subequal,  longitudinally  placed,  well 
separated  at  base  (Fig.  4).  Maxilla  (Figs.  5,  6)  with  six  dorsal  and  five  ventral  malar  setae:  maxillary 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


73 


palpus  with  basal  segment  shorter  than  apical.  Labium  (Fig.  5)  with  one-segmented  palpus;  premen- 
tal  sclerite  with  posterior  extension  shorter  than  anterior;  postmental  setae  1  and  3  short,  subequal; 
seta  2  more  than  four  times  longer  than  others.  Thoracic  and  abdominal  spiracles  with  airtubes  seven- 
annulated.  Prothorax  with  two  pleural  setae.  Meso-  and  metathorax  with  one  epipleural  and  one  pleu- 
ral  seta;  postdorsal  setae  1  and  3  longer  than  setae  2  and  4.  Abdominal  segment  IX  with  pleural  areas 
not  projecting  and  with  short  sternal  setae. 

Materials  examined.  Argentina,  Misiones,  Dto.  Iguazu.  Destacamento  Ecolacustre  Lago 
Uruguaf,  12-02-2001 ,  in  fruits  of  Pavonia  sp.,  2  ex.  Larvae  were  identified  based  on  their  association 
with  adult  specimens  found  on  the  same  hosts  and  inside  the  same  reproductive  structures. 

Comparative  notes.  Based  on  larval  characters,  A.  rubricosus  is  close  to  A. 
vestitus.  Both  species  have  frontal  setae  1  and  3  very  short,  four  epipharyngeal 
sensilla  arranged  in  a  single  cluster  and  the  labial  palpus  one-segmented.  In  the 
key  of  Ahmad  and  Burke  (1972),  they  key  out  together,  except  for  their  different 
sizes  (the  former  species  is  about  2  mm  and  the  latter,  4.1  -  5.5  mm).  They  also 
differ  in  the  characters  of  the  maxillary  palpus  and  premental  sclerite.  In  A. 
rubricosus  the  basal  segment  of  the  maxillary  palpus  is  shorter  than  the  apical 
segment,  and  the  posterior  extension  of  the  premental  sclerite  is  shorter  than  the 
anteromedian  extension.  In  A.  vestitus,  the  basal  segment  of  the  maxillary  palpus 
is  slightly  longer  than  the  apical  segment,  and  the  posterior  extension  of  the  pre- 
mental sclerite  is  longer  than  the  anteromedian  extension. 


Figs.  5-6.  Larva  of  Anthonomiis  rubricosus.  5)  Maxilla  and  lahium,  ventral;  6)  maxilla, 
dorsal.  Scales  =  0.1  mm. 


74  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  express  special  thanks  to  the  graduate  students  Isabel  Barrios,  Flavio  Moschione  and  Mariana 
Demaria  for  their  contributions  in  the  collection  and  identification  of  Malvaceae;  to  Cecilia  Margaria 
for  her  help  in  the  dissection  of  reproductive  structures  of  plants  in  order  to  find  weevils,  and  to  spe- 
cialists Horace  Burke  and  Wayne  Clark  for  their  helpful  comments  and  assistance  with  the  bibliog- 
raphy. The  financial  support  of  the  "Integrated  pest  management  Project  of  the  Cotton  Boll  Weevil  in 
Argentina,  Brazil  and  Paraguay"  (CFC-ICAC)  is  acknowledged,  as  well  as  the  support  of  CONICET 
(Consejo  Nacional  de  Investigaciones  Cientificas  y  Tecnicas)  from  Argentina. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Ahmad,  M.  and  H.  Burke.  1972.  Larvae  of  the  weevil  tribe  Anthonomini  (Coleoptera:  Curculio- 
nidae).  Miscellaneous  Publications.  Entomological  Society  of  America.  8(2):  31-81 . 

Alonso-Zarazaga,  M.  and  C.  H.  C.  Lyal.  1999.  A  world  catalogue  of  families  and  genera  of 
Curculionoidea  (Insecta:  Coleoptera).  Entomopraxis  S.  C.  P.  315  pp. 

Boheman,  C.  H.  1859.  Coleoptera.  Species  novas  descripsit.  In:  Kongliga  Svenska  Fregatten  Eu- 
genies  resa  omkring  Jorden  under  befa'l  af  C.  A.  Virgin  aren  1851-1853.Vetenskapliga  iakttagelser 
Pa  H.  Maj:t  Konung  Oscar  den  Forstes  befallning  utgifna  af  K.  Svenska  Vetenskaps-Akademien. 
Norstedt  &  Soner,  Stockholm.  Zoologi.  III.  Insekter,  pp.  113-217,  illus. 

Bosq,  J.  M.  1943.  Segunda  lista  de  Coleopteros  argentinos  daninos  a  la  agricultura.  Minist.  Agric. 
Nacion.  Dir.  Sanidad  Vegetal,  Buenos  Aires,  80  pags. 

Burke,  H.  R.  1976.  Bionomics  of  the  anthonomine  weevils.  Annual  Review  of  Entomology.  21: 
283-303. 

Burke,  H.  R.  and  J.  R.  Cate.  1983.  Descriptions  of  the  larva  and  pupa  of  Anthonomus  hunteri  and 
comparison  with  Anthonomus  grandis  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomo- 
logical Society  of  Washington  85(3):  456-562. 

Burke,  H.  R.  and  W.  H.  Cross.  1966.  A  New  Species  of  Anthonomus  attacking  cotton  in  Colombia, 
with  a  review  of  the  taxonomy  of  Anthonomus  vestitus  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae).  Annals  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  America  59(5):  924-931. 

Burke,  H.R.,  W.E.Clark,  and  W.  H.  Cross.  1984.  Larvae  and  pupae  of  the  Anthonomus  subgenus 
Anthonomorphus  Dietz,  A.  grandis  Boheman  and  A.  hunteri  Burke  and  Cate  (Coleoptera: 
Curculionidae).  The  Southwestern  Entomologist  9(  1 ):  84-90. 

Denier,  P.   1939.  Lista  de  los  artropodos  daninos  o  litiles  a  los  algodonales  argentinos.  Physis  17: 

553-567. 

Jones,  R.  W.  and  H.  R.  Burke.  1997.  New  species  and  host  plants  of  the  Anthonomus  grandis 
species  group  (Coleoptera:  Curculionidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Wash- 
ington. 99(4):  705-719. 

Lanteri,  A.  A.,  A.  E.  Marvaldi,  and  S.  M.  Suarez.  2002.  Gorgojos  de  la  Argentina  y  sus  plantas 
huespedes.  Tomo  I:  Apionidae  y  Curculionidae.  Publicacion  Especial  de  la  Soc.  Entomol  Argent. 
N°  1,98  pags. 

Marshall,  G.  A.  1938.  New  injurious  Curculionidae  (Col.).  Bulletin  of  Entomological  Research 
29(1):  1-8,  Illus. 

Marvaldi,  A.  E.   1999.  Morfologia  larval  en  Curculionidae.  Acta  Zoologica  Lilloana  45(1):  7-24. 

May,  B.  M.  1977.  Immature  stages  of  Curculionidae:  Larvae  of  the  soil-dwelling  weevils  of  New 
Zealand.  Journal  of  the  Royal  Society  of  New  Zealand  7:  189-228. 

May,  B.  M.  1979.  A  technique  for  dissecting  head  capsules  of  small  coleopterous  larvae.  The  New 
Zealand  Entomologist  7:  99. 

May,  B.  M.  1993.  Fauna  of  New  Zealand.  Larvae  of  Curculionoidea  (Insecta:  Coleoptera):  a  sys- 
tematic overview.  Manaaki  Whenua  Press,  Lincoln,  Canterbury,  New  Zealand  N"  28,  226  pp. 

Silva,  A.  G.  D'A.,  C.  R.  Conceives,  D.  Monteiro  Galvao,  A.  J.  L.  Conceives,  J.  Gomes,  M.  Do 
Nacimento  Silva,  and  L.  De  Simoni.  1968.  Quarto  Catalogo  dos  insetos  que  vivem  nas  plan- 
tas do  Brasil,  seus  parasitos  e  predadores.  Ministerio  da  Agricultura,  Departamento  de  Defesa  e 
Inspecao  Agropecuaria,  Servic.o  de  Defesa  Sanitaria  Vegetal,  Laboratorio  Central  de  Patologfa 
Vegetal.  Rio  de  Janeiro,  GB,  Brasil,  622  pp. 


Vol.  114.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 75_ 

A  KEY  TO  THE  GENUS  PHAEDON  (COLEOPTERA: 

CHRYSOMELIDAE:  CHRYSOMELINAE)  FROM  CHINA 

AND  THE  DESCRIPTION  OF  A  NEW  SPECIES' 

Si-qin  Ge,2  Xing-ke  Yang,2  and  Jun-zhi  Cui 

Abstract:  A  key  to  all  16  Chinese  species  of  Phaedon  Latreille  is  provided  with  a  description  of  P. 
fulgida  sp.  nov.,  from  Guizhou,  China.  The  new  species  is  similar  to  Phaedon  cuprea  Wang,  1992 
differing  primarily  in  the  presence  of  punctures  on  the  pronotum  and  in  aedeagus  morphology.  Type 
specimens  are  deposited  in  the  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  Sciences,  Beijing,  China. 

KEY  WORDS:  Phaedon,  Coleoptera,  Chrysomelidae.  China,  new  species. 

Phaedon  was  erected  in  1829  by  Latreille.  Chapuis  (1874)  treated  the  three 
genera,  Alitene,  Orthosticha,  Emmertrus,  as  synonyms  of  Phaedon.  The  genus 
Phaedon  currently  includes  about  75  species  worldwide,  33  of  which  occur  in 
Asia,  3  species  in  Europe,  13  species  in  North  America,  23  species  in  South 
America,  1  species  in  Africa  and  2  species  in  Australia.  The  bulk  of  the  species 
occur  between  60°N  and  50°S  in  temperate  and  sub-tropical  regions.  Species 
inhabit  the  farmlands  of  plains  up  to  alpine  meadows.  For  example,  P.  alpina  Ge 
et  Wang,  occurs  at  4,700m  which  is  the  highest  altitude  recorded  for  this  genus. 

Some  species  of  Phaedon  are  of  economic  importance.  For  example,  the  low- 
land species,  P.  brassicae  Baly  mainly  feeds  on  cabbage,  radish,  shepherd's- 
purse,  carrot,  shallot,  lettuce  and  other  similar  crops.  P.  annoraciae  Linnaeus 
mainly  feed  on  Armoracia.  The  two  species  are  important  pests  in  China.  P.ful- 
vicornis  Chen  mainly  feeds  on  Rubus.  Furthermore,  P.  alticola  Chen,  a  montane 
species,  feeds  on  Ranunculus  tricuspis  and  Lanccea. 

The  genus  Phaedon  was  first  studied  in  China  during  1934  by  the  late  Prof. 
Chen  Sicien  who  redescribed  two  species,  P.  annoraciae  Linnaeus  and  P.  bras- 
sicae Baly  in  that  year.  Subsequently  12  new  species  were  described  by  Chen 
(1936,  1974,  1984),  Wang  (1984,  1992a,  1992b,  1997)  and  Gressitt  and  Kimoto 
(1963).  Most  recently,  Ge  etal.  (2002)  described  three  new  species.  In  this  paper, 
we  give  a  key  for  all  the  Chinese  species  and  describe  a  new  species  from 
Guizhou,  China. 

Systematics 
Genus  Phaedon  Latreille 

Phaedon  Latreille,  1829,  In  Cuvier,  Regne  Anim.  ed.  2,  5:  151. 

Alitene  Gistl,  1857,  Vacuna,  2:  530. 

Orthosticha  Motschulsky,  I860.  Schrenck's  Reisen  Amurl.,  2:  196.  (Type  species:  Plagiodera  bonar- 

iense  Sahlberg.) 
Emmetrus  Motschulsky,  1860.  Schrenck's  Reisen  Amurl.,  2:  221.  (Type  species:  Chrysomela  betulae 

Fabric!  us.) 


'Received  on  November  18,  2003.  Accepted  on  December  9,  2003. 

:  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  25  Bei  Sihuanxilu,  Haidian,  Beijing.  1()()()8(), 
China.  E-mail:  gesq@ioz.ac.cn. 

Mailed  on  June  23.  2004 


76  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Diagnosis.  Elongate,  strongly  convex.  Head:  small,  deeply  inserted  into  pro- 
thorax.  Compound  eyes  elongate  or  sub-spherical.  Anterior  part  of  clypeus  con- 
cave or  convex.  Apical  segment  of  maxillary  palpi  slender,  twice  as  long  as 
penultimate  segment.  Antennae  extending  to  base  of  elytra,  segments  7-11 
broadened  apically.  Pronotum:  with  coarse  punctures;  anterior  margin  broadly 
emarginate  with  projecting  anterior  angles.  Base  with  or  without  a  raised  margin. 
Scutellum:  triangular  with  rounded  apex,  impunctate.  Elytra:  broader  than 
pronotum  at  base,  slightly  broadened  after  middle;  with  ten  striae,  not  including 
incomplete  basal  scutellar  row.  Epipleuron  plain,  broadened  basally,  slightly  nar- 
rowed posteriorly,  inner  edge  without  pubescence.  Underside:  Prosternal  process 
slender,  truncate  apically,  slightly  broadened;  procoxal  cavities  open;  mesoster- 
nal  process  broadened,  emarginate  apically.  Legs:  outer-lateral  margin  of  tibiae 
curved;  third  segment  of  tarsi  entire  or  bilobed;  claws  simple. 

Distribution.  Worldwide,  temperate  and  subtropical  regions. 

Key  to  the  Chinese  species  of  the  Genus  Phaedon  Latreille 

1 .  Basal  margin  of  pronotum  unmargined;  epipleuron  narrow;  third  segment  of  tarsi  entire 

P.fulvicornisChen,  1974 

Basal  margin  of  pronotum  margined;  epipleuron  broadened  basally,  slightly  narrowed  posterior- 
ly; third  segment  of  tarsi  bilobed 2 

2.  Dorsum  with  markings 3 

Dorsum  without  markings  5 

3.  Mid-posterior  area  of  elytra  with  dark  markings P.  gressitti  Daccordi,  1979 

Elytra  without  markings 4 

4.  Pronotum  reddish-brown  laterally  and  darker  medially,  dark  area  trapezoid,  narrow  apically, 

broadening  posteriorly,  covering  1/4  to  1/3  area  of  pronotum;  elytral  interstices  impunctate 

P.  maculicollis  Chen,  1974 

Pronotum  light  reddish-brown  laterally  and  dark  medially,  dark  area  trapezoid,  narrow  apically, 
broadening  posteriorly,  covering  1/3  to  1/2  area  of  pronotum;  elytral  interstices  with  fine  punc- 
tures  P.  potentillcie  Wang,  1992 

5.  Head  and  pronotum  dark  brown,  elytra  dark  blue,  purplish-blue  or  purplish-brown 

P.  alticoia  Chen,  1974 

Head,  pronotum  and  elytra  unicolorous 6 

6.  Hindwing  absent  7 

Hindwing  present  12 

7.  Claw  bearing  segment  of  tarsus  produced  apically  into  a  ventrally  directed  tooth-like  spur  (Fig. 

4)  8 

Claw  bearing  segment  of  tarsus  not  produced  apically  into  a  ventrally  directed  tooth-like  spur.9 

8.  Scutellum  sub-triangular  and  with  fine  punctures;  elytral  interstices  with  fine  punctures 

P.  cuprea  Wang,  1992 

Scutellum  ligulate  and  impuntate;  elytral  impunctate P.fulgida  Ge  et  Yang,  sp.  nov. 

9.  Epipleuron  impunctate;  interstriae  of  elytral  interstices  flat,  impunctate,  shagreened 

P.  alpina  Ge  et  Wang,  2002 

Epipleuron  punctate 10 

10.  Third  segment  of  antenna  longer  than  second;  epipleuron  with  coarse  and  sparse  punctures 

P.  wumingshanensis  Ge  et  Wang,  2002 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 TJ_ 

Third  antennal  segment  not  longer  than  second 1 1 

1 1 .  Body  blue,  two  basal  segments  of  antennae  reddish-brown 

P.  balangshanensis  Ge  el  Wang.  2002 

-  Body  purple,  antennae  dark P.  aptera  Chen  et  Wang,  1984 

12.Elytral  interstices  impunctate 13 

Elytra  punctate 14 

13.  Elytral  interstices  smooth P.  chinensis  Gressitt  et  Kimoto,  1963 

Elytral  interstices  shagreened P.  mellyi  Achard,  1922 

14.  Epipleuron  impunctate;  Body  metallic  reddish-brown  P.  fulvenscens  Weise,  1922 

Epipleuron  punctate 15 

15.  Elytral  interstice  9  and  10  of  equal  width P.  armoraciae  Linnaeus,  1758 

-  Elytral  interstice  10  wider  than  9 P.  brassicae  Baly,  1874 

Phaedon  fulgida  Ge  et  Wang,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-6) 

Diagnosis.  The  new  species  is  similar  to  P.  cuprea  Wang,  1992  differing  from 
these  primarily  in  punctation  of  the  pronotum  and  aedeagus  morphology.  P. 
cuprea  differs  from  the  new  species  by  having  the  following  characteristics: 
clypeus  with  sparse  punctures;  vertex  with  dense  and  fine  punctures;  pronotum 
with  coarse  and  dense  punctures;  scutellum  sub-triangular  and  with  fine  punc- 
tures; diameter  of  punctures  of  elytral  striae  is  the  same  as  those  of  pronotum,  in- 

terstriae  with  fine  punctures. 

Description.  Length:  3.92-4.60mm  (measured  from  the  apex  of  the  clypeus  to  the  apex  of  the 
elytra),  width:  2.72-3. 12mm  (measured  at  base  of  the  elytra). 

Form.  Body  sub-spherical,  convex  dorsally  (Fig.  1). 

Color.  Metallic  bronze;  clypeus,  last  segment  of  maxillary  palpus,  two  apical  segments  of  labial 
palpi  and  claws  mahogany  brown. 

Head.  Frons  slightly  depressed,  flattened  along  antennal  sockets;  clypeus  with  coarse  punctures 
and  pubescence;  upper  clypeus  (lower  frons)  between  antennal  sockets  with  sub-triangular  carina; 
frons  with  coarse  punctures,  and  vertex  with  finely  shagreened  surface  and  very  fine,  sparse,  con- 
fused punctures;  eyes  elliptical;  average  dorso-ventral  eye  length  =  0.09mm;  average  interocular  dis- 
tance (at  dorso-mesal  margins)  =  0.65mm. 

Antennae.  Slender,  extending  well  beyond  base  of  elytra,  segments  7-11  with  dense  pubescence; 
segment  (1-11)  length  (average  of  type  series)  in  millimeters  0.23,0.17,0.21,0.16,0.14.0.16,0.16, 
0.17, 0.19,  0.18, 0.22  (Fig.  2). 

Pronotum  (Fig.  3).  Average  length  at  middle  =  1.03mm,  average  width  at  middle  =  1.77mm; 
much  narrower  at  base  than  elytra;  rectangular;  lateral  margins  evenly,  gradually  rounded,  slightly 
narrower  at  antero-lateral  angles,  anterior  margin  widely  emarginate  with  projecting  antero-angles; 
postero-angles  obtuse;  anterior,  lateral  and  posterior  margins  with  raised  bead;  lateral  margin  with  a 
shallow  depression  on  central  area;  disc  with  sparse  punctures,  diameter  of  these  same  as  those  of 
clypeus;  with  finer  punctures  interspersed;  lateral  and  antero-angles  with  coarse  punctures;  posterior 
margin  with  coarse  and  dense  punctures;  surface  with  shagrination. 

Scutellum.  Ligulate,  smooth  and  impunctate,  surface  slight  shagreened. 

Elytra.  Length  =  2.56mm,  width  (at  middle)  =  3.38mm;  convex;  abbreviated  scutellary  stria  plus 
10  complete  striae  composed  of  deep,  large  punctures,  larger  than  those  of  the  clypeus;  interstices 
surface  smooth,  impunctate,  finely  shagreened;  humeral  callus  not  prominent;  apically  interstices 
tapered  and  narrow;  interstices  equally  spaced  except  8th  which  is  wider;  epipleuron  flat,  broadened 
basally,  slightly  narrowed  posteriorly. 

Underside.  Lateral  margin  of  prosternal  process  with  punctures  and  pubescence,  apically  trun- 
cate, slightly  broadened,  central  area  with  a  longitudinal  ridge;  procoxal  cavities  elongate,  open;  me- 
sosternal  process  narrow,  posterior  margin  emarginate.  with  sparse  punctures  and  pubescense;  meta- 


78 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig.  1.  Habitus  ofPhaedonJulgida,  NEW  SPECIES. 


sternum  with  large  coarse  punctures,  larger  than  those  of  the  elytra,  anterior  margin  emarginate; 
abdominal  sternites  with  small  shallow  punctures  and  sparse  pubescense. 

Legs.  With  large  punctures,  diameter  of  these  same  as  those  of  metasternum;  with  prominent 
pubescence,  especially  on  lateral  margin  of  tibiae  and  ventral  surface  of  tarsi;  femur  rectangular, 
outer-lateral  margin  with  shallow  depression;  tibiae  slender,  with  dense  pubescence  especially  at 
apex,  outer-lateral  margin  curved,  third  segment  of  tarsi  bilobed,  claw  bearing  segment  of  tarsus  pro- 
duced apically  into  a  ventrally  directed  tooth-like  spur  (Fig.  4);  claws  simple. 

Aedeagus.  In  dorsal  view  broadened  basally,  tapered  to  apex,  slightly  pointed  apically;  in  later- 
al view  bent  at  right  angles  (Figs.  5-6). 

Material  studied.  Holotype:  male,  China,  Guizhou  Province,  Huixiangping  County,  Fanjing 
Shan  (27.9°N,  108.6°E)  1780m,  1  August  2001,  Coll.  Hongbin  Liang.  Paratypes:  2  females,  same 
data  as  holotype,  except  collected  by  Kangzhen  Dong.  All  type  specimens  are  deposited  in  the 
Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  Beijing,  China. 

Etymology.  From  the  Latin,  fulgida,  meaning  shining. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


79 


0.5mm 


6 


Figs.  2-6  Phaedonjulgida,  NEW  SPECIES.  Fig.  2.  Antenna.  Fig.  3.  Pronotum. 
Fig.  4.  Claw.  Fig.  5.  Aedeagus  (lateral  view).  Fig.  6.  Aedeagus  (dorsal  view). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Mr.  Hongbin  Liang  and  Kangzhen  Dong  for  presenting  the  specimens  of  the  new 
species,  and  we  wish  to  thank  Mr.  J.  Cooler  (Hereford,  U.K.)  for  his  critical  review  of  the  first  draft 
of  this  paper.  This  project  was  supported  by  a  grant  from  National  Science  Foundation  of  China 
(Grant  No.  30200025),  CAS  Innovation  Program  (KSCX3-IOZ-01)  and  National  Science  Fund  tor 
Fostering  Talents  in  Basic  Research  (NFSC-J0030092). 


LITERATURE  CITED 


Achard,  J.   1922.  Descriptions  de  nouveaux  Chrysomelini.  Fragments  Entomologiques  Prague.  I- 
2:  1-48. 


80  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Baly,  J.  S.  1874.  Catalogue  of  the  phytophagous  Coleoptera  of  Japan,  with  descriptions  of  the 
species  new  to  the  science.  Transactions  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  London  1874:161-217. 

Chapuis,  F.  1874.  In:  Lacordaire,  M.Th.,  Chapuis,  M.F.,  Histoire  Naturelle  des  Insectes.  Genera 
des  Coleopteres  ou  expose  methodique  et  critique  de  tous  les  genres  proposes  jusqu'ici  dans  cet 
orderd'insectes.  10.  Famille  des  Phytophages.  Librairie  Encyclopedique  de  Roret,  Paris.  455  pp. 

Chen,  S.  H.  1936.  Catalogue  des  Chrysomelinae  de  la  Chine,  de  L'indochine  et  du  Japon.  Notes 
D'Entomologie  Chinoise  3(5):63-102. 

Chen,S.C.  1974.  New  Chrysomelid  beetles  from  west  China.  Acta  Entomologica  Sinica  17(1):  43- 
48. 

Chen,  S.C.  and  S.Y.Wang.  1984.  New  Chrysomeline  beetles  from  Hengduan  Mountains,  Yunnan. 
Acta  Zootaxonomica  Sinica  9(2):170-175. 

Daccordi,  M.  1979.  Nuove  specie  di  Crisomeline  della  Regione  Orientale,  (Coleoptera:  Chrysome- 
lidae  Subf.  Chrysomelinae).  Entomologica  Basiliensia  4:443-461. 

Fabricius,  J.  C.  1792.  Entomologiae  Systematicae  1:306-349. 

Ge,  S.  Q.,  S.  Y.  Wang,  and  X.  K.  Yang.  2002.  Notes  on  the  genus  Phaedon  Latreille  of  China 
(Coleoptera:  Chrysomelidae:  Chrysomelinae).  Acta  Zootaxonomica  Sinica  27(2):316-325. 

Gistl,  J.  1857.  Achthundert  und  zwanzig  neue  oder  unbeschriebene  wirbellose  Thiere.  Vacuna 
2:513-606. 

Gressitt,  J.  L.  and  Kimoto,  S.  1963.  The  Chrysomelidae  of  China  and  Korea.  Pacific  Insect 
Monograph  1A:  301-1026. 

Latreille,  P.  A.  1829.  Coleoptera:  132-155.  In,  Regne  Animal  Cuvier.  2nJ,  ed.,  5:  24+556pp. 
Linnaeus,  C.  1758.  Systema  Naturae.  Holmiae,  10th  Edition,  pp.  1-324. 

Motschulsky,  V.  1860.  Coleopteres  de  la  Siberie  Orientale  et  particulier  des  rives  de  L' Amour  2: 

79-257. 

Sahlberg,  C.  1834.  Dissertatio  entomologica  Insecta  Fennica,  Aboae  11.288pp. 

Wang,  S.  Y.  1992a.  Coleoptera:  Chrysomelidae:  Chrysomelinae:  628-645.  In,  Chen,  S.  H.  (Editor). 
Insects  of  the  Henduan  Mountains  Region,  1,  Science  Press,  Beijing:  1547pp. 

Wang,  S.  Y.  1992b.  Two  new  species  of  Leaf  beetles  from  Wuling  Mountain  of  China  (Coleoptera: 
Chrysomelidae).  Sinozoologia  9:175-178. 

Weise,  J  1922.  Chrysomeliden  der  Indo-Malayischen  Region.  Tijdschrift  voor  Entomologie  65:  39- 
130. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 8J_ 

NOTES  ON  MEXICAN  PSILOPYGA  AND  OXYCNEMUS 
(COLEOPTERA:  NITIDULIDAE)1 

Jose  Luis  Navarrete-Heredia2 

ABSTRACT:  Specific  distributional  data  for  Psilopyga  fasciata  in  Mexico  is  provided  and  new 
hosts  records  are  included  for  Oxycnemus  rostrosus,  and  P.  fasciata  from  Mexico,  and  P.  histrina,  and 
P.  nigripennis  from  the  United  States. 

KEY  WORDS:  Psilopyga,  Oxycnemus,  Coleoptera,  Nitidulidae. 

The  genus  Psilopyga  LeConte,  1853:  286  has  been  used  as  a  synonym  of 
Oxycnemus  by  some  authors  starting  with  LeConte  and  Horn  (1883)  and  fol- 
lowed more  recently  by  Parsons  (1943). 

Sharp  (1891:  364)  stated  that  "the  two  genera  are,  however,  very  distinct,"  an 
assertion  that  was  supported  in  a  phylogenetic  analysis  of  these  genera  and  other 
close  relatives  (Leschen  1999).  At  present,  six  species  are  included  in  this  genus, 
whereas  nine  are  included  in  Oxycnemus;  both  genera  are  represented  in  Mexico 
by  one  species  each  (Spornraft  1971;  Leschen  1999). 

The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  provide  specific  distributional  data  for 
Psilopyga  fasciata  in  Mexico  and  record  for  the  first  time  the  fungal  hosts  for  this 
species  and  Oxycnemus  rostrosus. 

Psilopyga  fasciata  Sharp,  1891:  364 

Fig.  1 

Psilopyga  fasciata  was  described  based  on  a  single  specimen  collected  by 
Truqui  from  Mexico  without  specific  locality  (Holotype  at  British  Museum, 
seen).  It  is  easily  recognized  from  the  rest  of  North  American  species  by  the 
bicolored  elytra:  one-third  to  three-fifths  of  the  base  orange  (as  in  the  Holotype, 
cited  by  Sharp  1891),  and  the  rest  black.  In  his  revision  of  the  Nearctic  Nitiduli- 
dae, Parsons  (1943)  recorded  this  species  from  Presscot,  Arizona,  USA,  without 
specific  host  data,  although  the  information  available  for  other  species,  cited 
Phallus  impudicus  as  the  host  for  Psilopyga  histrina  (LeConte),  and  P.  nigripen- 
nis  (LeConte)  (Parsons  1943)  there  are  also  new  records  for  these  species  asso- 
ciated with  Mutinus  elegans  (original  data  provided  by  R.  Leschen  from  speci- 
mens collected  in  Arkansas.  Specimens  in  his  collection). 

Material  examined.  Mexico:  Jalisco,  Tenamaxtlan,  Los  Picachos-Tenamaxtlan,  hosque  mesofi- 
lo  de  montaDa,  1820m,  ex  Laternea  columnata,  22.VII.2000.  J.  Cortes  (ICf.  19:  Coleccion 
Entomologica  del  Centre  de  Estudios  en  Zoologia,  CZUG).  United  States:  Arizona.  Maricopa  Co., 
Hwy.  260  at  Preacher  Canyon  (~6  mi  E  of  Star  Vly),  14.VIII.1992,  from  Phallus  impudicus 
(Phallaceae)  (coll.  W.B.  Warner)  (1  9;  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  FSCA). 

Three  of  the  four  species  (including  P.  fasciata)  from  the  United  States  are 


1  Submitted  on  February  16,  2002.  Accepted  on  December  1 ,  2003. 

:  Entomologia,  Centra  de  Estudios  en  Zoologia.  CUCBA,  Universidad  de  Guadalajara,  Apdo.  Postal 
234,  45100  Zapopan,  Jalisco,  Mexico.  E-mails:  snavarre@maiz.cucba.udg.mx  and  glenus® 
yahoo  .com.mx. 

Mailed  on  June  23.2004 


82 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig.  1.  Dorsal  view  of  Psilopyga  fasciata  Sharp  (male). 


recorded  from  Phallus  impudicus  where  this  species  is  distributed  primarily  in 
temperate  forest,  but  the  single  record  from  Mexico  includes  a  different  host, 
Clathrus  columnatus  (Clathraceae)  for  this  genus.  Although  the  last  record  is 
from  another  host  family,  all  of  them  belong  to  the  Order  Phallales. 


Vol.  114,  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


83 


rpr  g^JlPi1 

•t  '•:.  .*,v:;r. 


'':*•  '             '-i^'-':;'-:1': 

•-..-..   ,»••    .  .    •••.'.•'.''  ••;  ••     ,-...*.•"• 

-•?•*  '.  '-  .-  •  *-*         .'". 

'.    "M4-  "  •• 

•  "."•*_.  ..                                      -.               '• 


•'.' 

'.^'•'  -IV*:--.      *  .\.*:>!'- lv';  •• 


-'';4;;^^>>;/ '.'-'•".  ''^ 
•V:^":-;:"o;- 

>-•",".    -V   Jia"  •-"-.'.". 

1),»..   '  .         •  ,''»V 

^:-,:-% 


Fig.  2.  Dorsal  view  of  Ojrvcn^/«M5  rostrosus  Reitter  (male). 


rostrosus  Reitter,  1873: 137 
Fig.  2 

Listed  as  Oxycnemus  rostratus  in  Blackwelder  (1945),  this  species  is  record- 
ed from  Mexico  (Veracruz),  Guatemala,  Nicaragua  and  Panama.  Known  hosts 
for  the  species  of  this  genus  are:  Blumevania  rhacodes,  Dictyophora,  Lysurus 


84  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


periphragmoides  (Nouhra  and  Toledo  1994,  cited  also  in  Leschen  1999),  and 
Phallus  irnpudicus  for  Oxycnemus  lewisi  (Reitter)  (Hayashi  1978). 

Material  examined:  Veracruz,  Catemaco,  Dos  Amates,  22. VIII. 1992, 
Dyctiophora  indusiata  IV  (Phallaceae),  J.  L.  Navarrete-Heredia  (icf,  19;  J-L. 
Navarrete-Heredia  col.,  JLN);  Veracruz,  Cuauhtemoc,  NTP-80  No.  5,  29 .XII. 
1991 ,  J.  R.  Hernandez  (19;  JLN).  The  fungal  record  agrees  with  those  known  for 
the  genus.  The  single  unusual  finding  for  this  species  in  carrion  traps  may  be  the 
result  of  chemical  attraction  instead  of  close  association  with  carrion,  due  to  their 
restricted  association  with  Phallales  (Leschen  1999). 

DISCUSSION 

Specimens  of  both  species  were  collected  during  the  day  in  the  base  of  the 
fungi  and  inside  the  mature  "mycoegg"  (gelatinous  egg  structure,  sensu  Pegler 
and  Gomez  1994),  as  is  usual  for  these  beetles.  An  interesting  record  of  myceto- 
phagids  in  the  mycoeggs  of  Linderiella  rodrigueziana  (Clathraceae)  from  Costa 
Rica  (Pegler  and  Gomez  1994)  requires  confirmation.  Although  the  Mexican 
diversity  of  these  genera  is  not  high,  Mexico  is  the  single  country  in  the  Western 
Hemisphere  where  both  genera  occur  and  represent  the  most  southern  (Psilopy- 
ga)  and  northern  (Oxycnemus)  distribution  for  these  taxa.  In  Mexico,  Psilopyga 
species  occur  in  montane  areas  and  are  associated  with  temperate  mushrooms, 
but  Oxycnemus  is  found  primarily  in  localities  with  tropical  influence  and  its 
species  are  associated  with  the  single  species  of  Dyctiophora  which  is  tropical 
and  subtropical  in  distribution  (D.  indusiata)  (Guzman  et  al.  1990).  Due  to  their 
specific  association  with  Phallales,  additional  collections  of  these  cyllodines 
would  provide  important  information  on  their  biology  and  fungal  host  use. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  J.  Cortes  (Universidad  de  Guadalajara)  for  collecting  beetles  on  their  hosts,  P.  Skelley 
(Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods)  for  the  loan  of  material  from  the  United  States;  Laura 
Guzman-Davalos  (Universidad  de  Guadalajara)  for  her  help  with  mycological  information;  R.A.B. 
Leschen  (Landcare  Research),  and  P.  Skelley  for  their  review  and  comments  to  the  manuscript. 
Finally,  to  H.  E.  Fierros-Lopez  for  his  kind  help  with  the  drawings. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Blackwelder,  R  E.  1945.  Checklist  of  the  coleopterous  insects  of  Mexico.  Central  America,  the 
West  Indies,  and  South  America.  Smithsonian  Institution. United  States  National  Museum  185(3); 
343-550. 

Guzman,  G.,  L.  Montoya,  and  V.  M.  Bandala.  1990.  Las  especies  y  formas  de  Dictyophora 
{Fungi,  Basidiomycetes,  Phallale  en  Mexico  y  observaciones  sobre  su  distribucion  en  America 
Latina.  Acta  Botanica  Mexicana  9:  1-11. 

Hayashi,  N.  1978.  A  contribution  to  the  knowledge  of  the  larvae  of  Nitidulidae  occurring  in  Japan 
(Coleoptera:  Cucujoidea).  Insecta  Matsmurana  14:  1-97. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 85 


LeConte,  J.  L.  and  G.  H.  Horn.   1883.  Classification  of  the  Coleoptera  of  North  America.  Smith- 
sonian. Miscellaneous  Collections.  26  pt.  5  (507):  1-567  +  i-xxxvii. 

Leschen,  R.A.B.   1999.  Systematics  of  Nitidulinae  (Coleoptera:  Nitidulidae):  Phylogenetic  rela- 
tionships, convexity  and  the  origin  of  phallophagy.  Invertebrate  Taxonomy.  13:  845-882. 

Nouhra,  E.  R.  and  de  Toledo,  L.  D.  1994.  Interaccion  entre  Phallales  (Basidiomycotina)  e  insec- 
tos  (coleopteros  y  dipteros).  Boletin  de  la  Argentina  de  Botanica  30:  21-24. 

Parsons,  C.  T.  1943.  A  revision  of  Nearctic  Nitidulidae  (Coleoptera).  Bulletin  of  the  Museum  of 
Comparative  Zoology  (Harvard  University).  92:  1 19-278  +  13  pis. 

Pegler,  D.N.  and  L.D.  Gomez.  1994.  An  unusual  member  of  the  cage  fungus  family.  Mycologist 
8(pt.  2):54-59. 

Sharp,  D.  1891.  Nitidulidae.  In,  Godman,  F.  D.  and  O.  Salvin  (Editors.)  pp.  362-364.  Biologia 
Centrali  Americana.  Insecta,  Coleoptera  II.  Part.  1 .  Dulau  and  Co..  London. 

Spornraft,  K.   1971 .  Zwei  neue  Arten  der  Gattung  Oxycnemus  Er.  Und  Bestimmungstabelle  fur  die 
bisher  bekannten  Arten  (Coleoptera:  Nitidulidae).  Opuscula  Zoologica  (1 16):  1-10. 


86  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NEW  CONOPIDAE  FROM  THE 
NEOTROPICAL  REGION  (DIPTERA)1 

Sidney  Camras2 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  subgenus  Aureoconops  of  the  genus  Physoconops  and  six  new  species  of 
Conopidae  are  described:  Physoconops  (Aureoconops)  aureolus  from  Peru;  P.  (Pachyconops)  thomp- 
soni  from  the  Bahamas;  P.  (Kroeberoconops)  argentinus  from  Argentina:  Zodion  chavalai  from  Ar- 
gentina; Zodion  bellum  from  Mexico;  and  Stylogaster  parrilloi  from  Costa  Rica. 

KEY  WORDS:  Physoconopus,  Aureoconopus,  Zodion,  Stylogaster,  Diptera,  Conopidae,  Neotropi- 
cal. 

The  six  new  species  of  conopids  described  in  this  paper  are  quite  distinct  and 
easily  recognized.  Many  other  apparently  new  species  are  present  in  various  col- 
lections received  for  identification,  but  more  study  and  material  are  required  to 
rule  out  variation  of  known  species. 

Conopidae  are  often  collected  individually  as  evident  from  these  new  species 
being  known  from  single  specimens,  or  in  one  case,  from  two  specimens  of  the 
same  sex. 


Genus  Physoconops  Szilady 
Subgenus  Aureoconops,  NEW  SUBGENUS 

(Fig.  1) 

Type  species  Physoconops  aureolus  Camras 

Vertex  triangular,  large  and  prominent,  extending  anteriorly  over  one  third  of  the  frons.  Frons  nar- 
row, longer  than  wide.  First  flagellomere  one  fourth  longer  than  pedicel.  Abdominal  pedicel  long  and 
narrow.  Second  tergite  four  times  as  long  as  wide.  Gold  pollinose  areas  extensive  and  distinct  from 
dark  areas. 

Comments.  This  subgenus  is  unique  in  the  large  triangular  shape  of  the  ver- 
tex and  the  prominent  gold  pollinose  coloration.  The  narrow  frons  associated 
with  the  long  first  flagellomere  is  also  unusual.  In  my  key  to  the  subgenera  of 
Conops  (Camras  1955:  161)  it  comes  closest  to  Gyroconops  which  has  a  wide 
frons  and  the  vertex  mainly  rounded  anteriorly. 


Physoconops  (Aureoconops)  aureolus,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.l) 

Head  yellow  and  gold  pollinose.  Ocellar  tubercle  and  Y-shaped  pattern  on  frons  black,  as  is  the 
antenna,  proboscis  and  occiput  centrally.  Black  hair  on  dorsal  part  of  vertex.  Proboscis  nearly  two 
times  as  long  as  head.  Antennal  proportions  1:  2:  2V4.  Scape  four  times  as  long  as  wide. 

Thorax  brownish  black  but  mainly  gold  pollinose.  Distinct  wide  gold  pollinose  pleural  stripe  joins 
gold  of  the  mesonotum.  A  velvety  black  midstripe  and  divided  black  lateral  stripe  on  the  mesonotum. 


1  Received  on  January  31 ,  2002.  Accepted  on  November  28,  2003. 

2  Associate,  Division  of  Insects,  The  Field  Museum,  1400  S.  Lake  Shore  Drive,  Chicago,  IL  60605- 
2496,  USA. 

Mailed  on  June  23,2004 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  2,  March  &  April  2003 87 


Legs  brownish  black,  mainly  gold  pollinose.  Apical  part  of  tarsi  and  tips  of  claws  black.  Claws  oth- 
erwise and  pulvilli  yellow. 

Wing  with  brownish  gray  pattern  between  vein  R+R1  and  RS+R4+5  and  vena  spuria.  Apical  part 
of  wing  paler  gray.  Pattern  darkest  above  and  below  vein  R4+5.  Halter  yellow,  rufous  at  club  and 
base. 

Abdomen  mainly  black,  brownish  black  on  second  segment,  yellow  at  junction  of  second  and 
third  segments.  Gold  pollinose  apical  margins  on  all  segments  and  entirely  so  on  apical  segment. 
Pedicel  long  and  narrow.  Club  of  abdomen  abnormally  contracted.  Genitalia  brownish  black. 

Length:  12  mm. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  Cf.  Peru:  Madre  de  Dios:  Manu,  Rio  Manu,  250  m.,  Pakitza,  12°  7'S,  70° 
58'W,  9-23 .ix. 1988,  Amnon  Freidberg.  Held  on  deposit  at  USNM  for  Peru  (see  Zumbado  &  Thomp- 
son, 1997:80  for  details  on  this  concept). 

Remarks.  This  species  keys  to  P.  costatus  (Fabricius,  1805)  in  my  key  (Cam- 
ras,  1955:  186)  but  that  species  has  a  wide  frons  and  belongs  to  the  subgenus 
Aconops. 


Physoconops  (Pachyconops)  thompsoni,  NEW  SPECIES 

Head  entirely  black  except  for  rufous  at  the  antennal  prominence  of  the  frons,  facial  grooves  and 
oral  area,  proboscis  except  for  labellae,  most  of  style,  part  of  scape,  and  small  areas  on  occiput; 
orbitals  and  facial  grooves  yellowish  white  pollinose.  Antennal  proportions  1:2:2.  Scape  three  times 
as  long  as  wide. 

Thorax  entirely  black  except  for  small  rufous  areas  near  postpronotum  and  on  pleura.  Coxae  and 
legs  rufous,  but  tarsi  black  except  at  base.  Pulvilli  and  claws  yellow;  tips  of  claws  black. 

Wing  and  veins  from  costa  to  vein  CuA  +  CuAl  bright  rufous;  sharply  black  in  apical  half  of  cell 
R4+5  and  adjacent  cell  R2+3;  black  along  vein  CuAl  in  discal  cell;  very  pale  rufous  in  posterior  part 
of  wing,  but  distinctly  hyaline  between  vena  spuria  and  vein  M.  Halter  rufous,  black  at  club  and  base. 

Abdomen  rufous  on  segments  one  to  three  except  for  narrow  black  margin  at  base  of  first  and 
apex  of  third  segments;  apical  margins  yellow  white  pollinose  at  first  to  third  segments  and  at  sides 
of  second  segment.  Remainder  of  abdomen  and  genitalia  shining  black. 

Length:  14  mm. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  Cf.  Bahamas:  San  Salvador  Island,  North  Point.  4.vi.  1978,  A.G.  Scar- 
brough  (USNM). 

Remarks.  This  species  keys  to  couplet  6  (Camras,  1955:  184),  but  has  rufous 
on  abdominal  segments  two  and  most  of  one  and  three.  Named  for  F.  Christian 
Thompson,  who  brought  this  specimen  to  my  attention,  in  appreciation  for  his 
leadership  and  his  fine  work  on  Syrphidae  especially  those  of  the  West  Indies. 


Physoconops  (Kroeberoconops)  argentinus,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  2) 

Head,  antenna  and  proboscis  black.  Upper  medial  part  of  face  yellow;  ocelli  and  small  areas  on 
antennae  rufous;  face,  grooves  and  orbitals  gold  pollinose  in  some  views.  Antennal  proportions  I : 
21/2:l1/2.  Scape  3Vi  times  long  as  wide. 

Thorax  entirely  black,  faint  yellow  pollinose  in  some  views.  Legs  black.  Coxae  gold  pollinose. 
Rufous  areas  on  knees,  tarsi,  and  pulvilli.  Claws  entirely  black. 

Wing  pattern  from  costa  to  vein  CuA+CuAl  mainly  rufous  but  paler  in  costal  and  cell  R+Bm: 
blackish  apically  especially  along  vein  R4+5  and  along  entire  vein  R 1 .  Halter  rufous,  club  black,  gray 
at  base. 

Abdomen  black,  with  a  distinct  rufous  band  at  junction  of  second  and  third  segments;  second  seg- 
ment very  shiny;  gold  pollinose  posterior  bands  on  segments  three  to  five,  entirely  gold  pollinose  on 


88 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


1 


1,  Physoconops  aureolus,  vertex  and  frons;  2,  Physoconops  argentinus,  same;  3,  Zodion 
helium,  mesonotum;  4,  Zodion  chvalai,  abdomen;  5,  Stylo gaster  parrilloi,  ovipositor,  api- 
cal segment;  6,  Stylogaster  triannulata,  same. 


sixth  segment.  Second  segment  five  times  as  long  as  wide.  Third  segment  shorter  and  becoming 
much  wider  apically  resulting  in  a  distinct  wide  abdominal  club.  Genitalia  rufous  and  black. 

Length:    1 1  mm. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  Cf.  Argentina:  Volcan,  2000  m.,  ii.1927  (USNM) 

Remarks.  This  species  keys  to  P.  hermanni  (Krober,  1915)  (Camras,  1955: 
184)  but  has  the  facial  grooves  and  legs  black. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 89_ 

Zodion  bellum,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  3) 

Head  mainly  yellow,  vertex  and  frons  rufous.  Blackish  area  and  gold  pollinose  triangle  at  side  of 
vertex.  Ocellar  tubercle  black.  Face  and  gena  gold  pollinose.  Brown  area  between  face  and  gena. 
Grooves  blackish.  Occiput  gray  pollinose,  gold  pollinose  between  the  usual  two  black  lines  from  the 
vertex  to  neck.  Antenna  mainly  black,  first  flagellomere  dark  rufous.  Arista  black.  Antennal  propor- 
tions 1 :4:2'/2.  Proboscis  black,  one  and  one  half  times  head  length. 

Thorax  and  coxae  blue  gray  pollinose  with  yellowish  areas.  Mesonotal  black  stripes  very  distinct, 
the  submedials  being  a  little  narrower  and  shorter  than  the  sublaterals  and  the  laterals.  The  sublater- 
als  extend  onto  the  scutellum.  Black  areas  on  anepisternum.  Eight  scutellar  bristles.  Legs  and  claws 
black.  Pulvilli  yellow.  Wing  grayish  hyaline,  veins  black.  Calypter  yellowish  white.  Halter  yellow, 
brown  at  base. 

Abdominal  segments  one  to  three  blue  gray  pollinose,  remainder  of  the  abdomen  gold  pollinose. 
Second  and  third  segments  with  large  paired  triangular  black  marks  and  narrow  gold  pollinose  pos- 
terior margins.  Very  distinct  narrow  black  stripes  on  fourth  segment.  V-shaped  posterior  margin  of 
fifth  segment  appears  blackish  on  anterior  view.  Genitalia  shining  black. 

Length:  8  mm. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  Cf.  Mexico:  El  Camaron,  20  mi.  E,  Oax.  21.vii.1956,  D.D.  Linsdale 
(Camras  Collection). 

Remarks.  This  species  keys  to  Z.pictum  Schiner,  1868  (Pearson  and  Camras, 
1978:  205)  which  does  not  have  the  distinctive  gold  pollen  on  the  apical  abdom- 
inal segments.  This  specimen  was  studied  by  Pearson  and  he  also  thought  it  was 
new  and  near  Z.  pictiim. 


Zodion  chvalai,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  4) 

Vertex  reddish  brown  laterally  extending  onto  the  frons,  yellow  centrally.  Ocellar  triangle  black. 
Frons  bright  orange  yellow.  Face,  grooves,  gena  and  lower  occiput  yellow  pollinose.  Upper  occiput 
mainly  black  with  usual  pair  of  black  lines  from  vertex  to  neck.  Antenna  yellow,  black  apically  on 
first  flagellomere  and  at  base  and  apex  of  arista.  Proportions  1:3:3.  Gena  two  thirds  of  the  eye  height. 
Proboscis  black,  more  than  two  times  head  length. 

Thorax  pale  yellow  and  gray,  gray  and  yellowish  pollinose.  Distinct  sublateral  black  line  extend- 
ing onto  the  scutellum.  Slender  shorter  black  midline  does  not  reach  the  scutellum.  Metanotum  gray 
pollinose,  lower  margin  shining  black.  Coxae  and  legs  yellow  with  yellow  pollinose  areas  on  coxae 
and  tibiae.  Apical  segment  of  tarsi  partly  black.  Pulvilli  yellow;  claw  yellow,  black  apically.  Wing 
faintly  yellow  hyaline,  yellow  in  costal  and  subcostal  cells  and  at  base.  Halter  yellow. 

Abdomen  rufous  with  gold  pollinose  longitudinal  markings.  Distinct  black  posterior  margins  on 
segments  two,  three  and  four.  Seventh  segment,  genitalia  and  theca  shining  rufous.  Theca  slender 
with  black  margin,  as  long  as  wide. 

Length:  6.5  mm. 

Type  Data.  Holotype  9  Argentina:  Cordoba,  Capilla  del  Monte,  coll.  Prf.  Hosseus  (Chvala  Col- 
lection). 

Remarks.  This  species  keys  to  couplet  19  (Pearson  and  Camras,  1975:206), 
but  has  the  abdomen  rufous  with  distinct  black  posterior  margins  on  segments 
three,  four  and  five.  An  entirely  rufous  abdomen  in  a  female  is  unique  in  this 
genus. 

Etymology.  Named  for  Professor  Milan  Chvala,  Charles  University,  Prague, 
in  appreciation  of  his  help  and  his  fine  work  on  Palearctic  Conopidae. 


90  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Stylogaster  parrilloi,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  5) 

Vertex  triangular,  dark  yellow,  reaching  anterior  one  third  of  frons.  Ocellar  tubercle  shining  black. 
Frons  velvety  brownish  black.  Face  and  gena  yellow  with  some  brownish  areas,  silvery  pollinose. 
Medial  eye  facets  very  large.  Occiput  pale,  dark  dorsally,  white  pollinose.  Antenna  dark  yellow,  first 
flagellomere  rufous,  black  dorsally.  Arista  black,  as  long  as  pedicel.  Antennal  proportions  1:2:6. 
Proboscis  black,  yellow  basally  and  on  labella;  second  (middle)  segment  three  times  as  long  as  head. 

Thorax  yellow  and  white.  Most  of  mesonotum  and  pleural  stripe  back  with  greenish  sheen. 
Postpronotum,  posterior  margin  of  mesonotum,  margins  of  scutellum  and  upper  margin  of  meta- 
notum  yellow.  Pro-  and  mesocoxa  and  legs  yellow.  All  tarsi  black.  Metafemur  with  three  black  bands, 
the  apical  band  is  narrowest.  Metatibia  black,  yellow  at  base  and  preapical  band  which  is  almost 
entirely  white  haired,  and  occupies  about  one  fourth  of  the  tibia.  Wing  grayish  hyaline,  veins  black. 
Halter  yellow,  brown  at  club  and  base. 

Abdomen  rufous,  with  yellow  anterior  bands  which  are  white  pollinose  in  some  views.  Fifth  ter- 
gite  black  dorsally  on  anterior  half.  Hairs  on  sides  of  first  tergite  white.  The  narrow  first  segment  of 
the  ovipositor  and  almost  proximal  half  of  second  segment  rufous,  the  remainder  black.  Third  seg- 
ment black  on  proximal  two  fifths  and  narrowly  at  the  apex  including  the  medial  process  and  most  of 
the  apical  structures.  Preapical  band  white  and  white  haired  occupying  two  fifths  of  the  third  segment. 

Length:  14  mm.  (Abdomen  4  mm,  ovipositor  7  mm.). 

Type  Data.  Holotype  tf .  Costa  Rica,  Ala.,  20  km  S.  Upala,  1 1-15.V.1990.  F.D.  Parker  (Utah  State 
University).  Paratype:  Same  data  as  holotype,  1  l-20.iv.1991 .  Similar  to  the  holotype  but  having  black 
on  the  fourth  tergite  proximally  at  the  center,  and  apically  at  the  sides. 

Remarks.  In  the  key  to  the  species  of  the  neglecta  group  (Camras  and 
Parrillo,  1985:123),  this  species  keys  to  S.  triannulata  Camras  and  Parrillo,  1985 
(Fig.  6).  That  species  has  a  longer  and  more  slender  ovipositor,  more  than  twice 
the  length  of  the  abdomen.  The  rufous  at  the  base  of  the  second  segment  is  very 
short,  and  the  white  area  on  the  third  segment  occupies  about  five-sixths.  There 
is  almost  no  black  apically. 

Etymology.  Named  after  Philip  P.  Parrillo,  Field  Museum,  Insect  Division, 
Chicago,  in  appreciation  of  his  opinions,  advice,  and  assistance  over  many  years. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

My  thanks  are  due  to  David  Pollock  for  assistance  in  preparation  of  the  manuscript;  to  Lori  Grove 
for  inking  and  preparing  the  illustrations  for  publication;  and  to  Rupert  Wenzel  and  Alfred  Newton 
for  reviewing  the  manuscript  and  making  suggestions.  All  are  staff  members  of  the  Field  Museum. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Camras,  S.  1955.  A  review  of  the  new  world  flies  of  the  genus  Conops  and  allies  (Diptera: 
Conopidae).  Proceedings  of  the  United  States  National  Museum  105  (3355):155-187. 

Camras,  S.  and  P.  P.  Parrillo.  1985.  Review  of  new  world  Stylogaster  (Diptera:  Conopidae). 
Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  78:111-126. 

Pearson,  D.  L.  and  S.  Camras.  1978.  Notes  and  key  to  neotropical  Zodion  (Diptera:  Conopidae). 
Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society  5 1(2):  198-206. 

Zumbado,  M  and  F.  C.  Thompson.  1997.  Nuevas  especies  de  Sterphus  (Diptera:  Syrphidae)  de 
Costa  Rica  con  notas  sobre  especies  presentes  en  Costa  Rica.  Southwestern  Entomologist  22:  79- 
90. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 9J_ 

TWO  ADDITIONAL  STATE  RECORDS  OF  F,  MALE 

INTERSPECIFIC  HYBRID  L1MENITIS 

(BASILARCHIA)  SPP.  FORM  "RUBIOUS"  STRECKER 

(LEPIDOPTERA:  NYMPHALIDAE)1 

Austin  P.  Platt2  and  E.  Thomas  McClanahan' 

ABSTRACT:  State  records  of  single  male  specimens  of  the  interspecific  hybrid  form  "rubidus" 
(Lepidoptera,  Nymphalidae:  Limenitis  (Basilarchia)  are  reported  from  New  Mexico  and  Kansas 
U.S.A.  This  form  arises  from  rare  mixed  matings  between  L.  archippus  (Cr.)  x  L.  arthemis  astyanax 
(Fabr.),  two  closely  related  species  which  are  involved  in  two  quite  differently  colored  mimicry  com- 
plexes. The  hybrids  often  occur  when  one  or  both  of  the  parental  species  is  or  are  rare.  The  New 
Mexican  specimen  involves  the  two  southwestern  desert  subspecies  of  the  parental  butterflies.  These 
two  state  records  bring  to  5 1  the  known  occurrences  of  these  natural  hybrids,  all  of  which  are  males. 
This  hybrid  form  has  been  reported  from  20  states  and  the  District  of  Columbia.  Most  of  the  hybrid 
records  occur  late  in  the  flight  season,  except  in  Florida.  Phenotypically  and  behaviorally  this  form 
represents  a  complete  breakdown  of  the  different  mimetic  resemblances  present  in  its  two  parental 
species,  thus  placing  this  insect  at  a  considerable  selective  disadvantage  in  natural  populations. 

KEY  WORDS:  Interspecific  hybrid,  Limenitis  (Basilarchia),  Lepidoptera,  Nymphalidae. 

This  note  reports  two  additional  state  records  of  Fi  interspecific  hybrids 
between  Limenitis  (Basilarchia)  archippus  (Cr.),  the  viceroy,  and  the  red-spotted 
purple,  L.  arthemis  astyanax  (Fabr.).  These  butterflies  have  been  described  as  hy- 
brid form  "rubidus"  Strecker  1878.  Such  taxonomic  designations  when  applied 
to  interspecific  hybrids  are  not  recognized  as  being  valid  by  the  International 
Commission  of  Zoological  Nomenclature  (ICZN)  (Masters  1972).  Earlier  re- 
views of  these  rare  and  unusual  insects  have  been  reported  by  Mead  1872,  Hold- 
ridge  1899,  Platt  et  al.  1978,  Ritland  1990,  Covell  1989,  1994,  Platt  and  Mauds- 
ley  1994,  Boyd  et  al.  1999,  and  Schiefer  1999.  This  form  occurs  rarely,  but  with 
some  regularity,  and  is  broadly  distributed  across  the  United  States.  Between 
1872  and  1998,  "rubidus"  hybrids  have  been  reported  from  20  states  and  the 
District  of  Columbia  (Table  1).  This  hybrid  insect  apparently  results  from  a  very 
few  interspecific  matings  occurring  year  after  year  in  certain  localized  "hot 
spots."  Such  "hot  spots"  have  been  reported  from  north-central  Florida,  north- 
eastern Georgia,  southwestern  Kentucky,  eastern  Nebraska,  and  east-central 
North  Carolina  (Platt  et  al.  1978,  Platt  and  Greenfield  1974,  Platt  and  Maudsley 
1994,  Ritland  1990,  Covell  1994).  Many  of  the  records  are  from  late  in  the  flight 
season,  and  they  occur  when  one  or  both  of  the  parental  species  often  are  uncom- 
mon. All  of  the  51  known  captured  or  observed  naturally  occurring  specimens  of 
these  hybrids  apparently  have  been  males.  There  is  some  recent  evidence  that 


1  Received  on  February  19,  2002.  Accepted  on  November  28,  2003. 

-  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  U.  M.  B.  C.,  1000  Hill  Top  Circle,  Baltimore,  Maryland  21250, 
U.S.A.  Email:  platt@umbc.edu. 

'605  East  69th  Street,  Kansas  City,  Missouri  64131 .  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  June  23,2004 


92 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


such  interspecific  hybrids  are  capable  of  backcrossing  with  parental  females  in 
nature  (Platt  et  al.  in  review). 

Table  1 .  Number  of  individuals.  Locations  (States),  and  Chronology  (years)  of  51  occurrences  [cap- 
tures, eclosions  (e),  and  sightings  (s)  of  hybrid  form  [L.  (B.)  "rubidus"]  from  before  1872  through 
1998.  (nd  =  no  date). 


Number  of 
Individuals 

Locations  (States) 

Chronology  (Years) 

1 

Arizona 

1979 

1 

Arkansas 

1933 

1 

Delaware 

1943 

10  (8C,  1s) 

Florida 

1974,  1986,  1987 

1 

Illinois 

1960 

5(1*) 

Georgia 

1973,  1974,  1984,  1986 

1 

Kansas 

1986 

5 

Kentucky 

1948,  1978,  1980,  1993,  1998 

2(l"d) 

Massachusetts 

1896 

1 

Michigan 

1974 

4(3^) 

Mississippi 

1995,  1998 

2 

Nebraska 

1963 

2 

New  Jersey 

1880,  1910 

1 

New  Mexico 

1983 

4  (2nd) 

New  York 

1895,  1913 

2 

North  Carolina 

1970,  1972 

2(lnd) 

Pennsylvania 

Before  1872 

1 

Texas 

1970 

2 

Virginia 

1974,  1976 

2 

Wisconsin 

1971,  1976 

Knd) 

District  of  Columbia 

— 

The  first  state  record  (Fig.  1)  was  collected  in  the  Peloncillo  Mountains, 
Guadalupe  Canyon,  Hildalgo  County,  New  Mexico,  on  September  3,  1983,  by  S. 
J.  Gary  at  an  elevation  of  about  4700  ft.  (1433  m).  Mr.  Gary  informs  A.P.P.  that 
the  collecting  conditions  were  excellent,  and  that  he  observed  over  40  species  of 
butterflies  on  that  day.  Guadalupe  Canyon  passes  through  a  short  section  of 
Arizona  before  turning  southward  and  joining  the  Rio  Yaqui  at  Sonora,  Mexico. 
He  observed  two  red-spotted  purples  flying  near  where  he  collected  the  hybrid, 
but  also  notes  that  viceroys  usually  do  not  occur  in  Guadalupe  Canyon  at  the  site, 
although  they  may  occur  farther  downstream  in  Mexico.  In  that  region  the  two 
parent  species  are  separated  altitudinally,  with  L.  archippus  usually  being  found 
below  5000  ft.  (1524  m),  and  L.  a.  astyanax  occurring  up  to  elevations  of  8000 
ft.  (2438  m).  He  speculates  that  this  interspecific  pairing  may  have  resulted  from 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 93_ 

an  L.  archippus  straying  too  far  upstream,  thus  encountering  only  the  other  spe- 
cies for  potential  mates  (S.D.  Gary  pers.  comm.). 

The  specimen  was  given  to  A.  P.  Platt  by  M.  E.  Toliver,  and  presently  is  in  the 
Platt  Collection  at  U.M.B.C.  in  Baltimore,  Maryland.  The  collection  locality  in- 
dicates that  this  F,  hybrid  represents  an  interspecific  cross  involving  the  two 
southwestern  (desert)  subspecies  of  the  parental  butterflies,  namely,  L.  archippus 
obsoleta  (Edw.)  x  L.  arthemis  arizonensis  (Edw.)  (Figs.  2  and  3).  The  phenotype 
of  this  hybrid  is  of  the  "lighter"  (more  orange-brown,  and  hence,  archippus-\ike) 
coloration  of  "rubidus,"  but  it  otherwise  is  typical  of  that  of  the  wild  hybrids  for 
the  more  widely  distributed  eastern  forms  of  the  two  parental  species.  Another 
earlier  southwestern  "rubidus"  specimen  (which  also  most  likely  represents  a 
state  record,  as  well)  is  noted  from  Arizona  by  Bailowitz  and  Brock  1991.  The 
latter  specimen  was  collected  on  October  13,  1979,  by  R.  A.  Bailowitz  at  St. 
David  in  Cochise  County,  in  southeastern  Arizona.  St.  David  is  located  just 
southeast  of  Benson,  Arizona,  and  is  about  85  mi.  (137  km)  due  west  of  the 
Peloncillo  Mountains,  not  too  far  from  Guadalupe  Canyon. 

The  Kansas  state  record  of  hybrid  "rubidus"  (Fig.  4)  was  taken  on  August  31 , 
1996,  by  E.  T.  McClanahan  while  he  was  out  collecting  butterflies  with  his  wife 
Judy,  and  his  son  Michael,  in  Lyon  County,  12  miles  west  of  Emporia.  Michael 
first  saw  the  dark  Limenitis  butterfly  patrolling  in  a  wooded  area  beside  a  gravel 
road  where  the  McClanahans  had  stopped  adjacent  to  some  fields.  The  insect 
repeatedly  returned  to  perch  high  up  in  a  tall  shrub  on  an  embankment  along  the 
roadway.  Attempting  to  induce  flight,  and  perhaps  bring  the  insect  within  reach, 
Michael  tossed  bits  of  gravel  toward  the  butterfly,  which  flew  out  and  downward, 
but  it  always  managed  to  elude  capture.  E.  T.  M.  finally  climbed  up  the  embank- 
ment and  netted  the  insect  on  its  perch  about  10-12  ft.  above  the  road.  This  but- 
terfly is  of  the  darker  (more  L.  arthemis  astyanax-\ike)  phenotype. 

Extensive  laboratory  hybridization  of  the  two  parental  species  of  Limenitis 
done  at  U.M.B.C.  by  A. P. P.  reveals  that  these  interspecific  crosses  are  fertile  in 
both  directions  with  regard  to  sex  (Platt  1975,  1983,  1987).  Likewise,  wild  inter- 
specific pairings  have  been  observed  taking  place  in  both  directions  as  well 
(Klots  1959,  Ritland  1990,  and  Covell  1994).  When  strains  from  the  same  geo- 
graphic locality  are  used  in  the  crosses,  all  of  the  F,  hybrids  are  males,  with  but 
a  single  exception  (Platt  and  Harrison  1994).  Laboratory  breeding  of  these  but- 
terflies demonstrates  (contrary  to  what  has  been  reported  in  the  literature)  that  L. 
archippus,  which  prefers  open  fields  and  moist  lowland  meadow  habitats,  is  oli- 
gophagous  and  restricted  to  the  Salicaceae  (willows  and  poplars)  for  its  larval 
foodplants,  whereas,  L.  arthemis  astyanax  is  essentially  polyphagous,  feeding  on 
a  wide  variety  of  both  rosaceous  and  salicaceous  foodplants.  In  New  England 
and  Maryland  populations  at  least,  the  preferred  foodplant  of  this  mixed  forest 
species  is  wild,  or  black  cherry.  Primus  serotina  Ehrh.  This  rosaceous  plant  con- 
tains chemical  (cyanin)  deterrents  which  can  be  sensed  by  viceroy  larvae  (Flaim 
&  Platt,  pers.  obs.),  thus  preventing  them  from  feeding  on  such  plants.  However, 
the  hybrid  "rubidus"  larvae  will  accept  leaves  from  both  plant  families  (Hanson 


94 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


<u 
> 


>.— 


afc 

2     B 

G    ca 


o  U 


u 


CO 


oo 


s  _r 


E  .^ 


3 

oo 


on  §   c 

O  '""•*  S^ 

1 1 5 

5 1 1 

£  -su 

z  *  c 

<-H  n 


n=  _•  o 
K-3  E 

oJ^^ 


00 


^H  .      "^3 

•£    u  'C 


r  e  HP-  * 

c«        >  HH  VH 

3  ^  ^~,  O 

^  ^   ^  ^ 

•9  ^    •  -a 

p  u  -a  c 

W  . LM  ^t 


•c 


Qi    i> 


^   s   ob  S 
<y  S 
s 

-i   •«   rJ    D, 

,r,      b*    tC      <U 


£  r7  —i   ca 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


95 


(n=35)  20  other  states 
(n=  10)  Florida 


June 


July       Aug.      Sept. 
Time  of  Year 


Oct.       Nov. 


Figure  5.  Monthly  records  of  the  occurrence  of  45  captures,  eclosions,  and  sightings  of 
hybrid  form  L.  (B.)  "rubidus"  Stkr.  throughout  the  U.S.  (solid  bars)  and  in  Florida  (cross- 
hatched  bars)  between  1872  -1998. 


1976,  de  Boer  and  Hanson  1984).  Within  single  broods  both  the  lighter  and  dark- 
er morphs  of  "rubidus"  can  occur  as  siblings  (Platt  and  Greenfield  1971 ,  Platt  et 
al.  1978). 

The  two  hybrid  records  reported  here  were  both  taken  late  in  the  flight  season, 
agreeing  with  those  previously  reported  (Fig.  5).  The  only  exception  to  this  gen- 
erality is  in  Florida,  where  most  of  this  hybridization  seems  to  take  place  earlier 
in  the  flight  season  (Ritland  1990,  Platt  and  Maudsley  1994).  Thirty-five  records 
from  other  than  Florida  have  a  mean  collection  emergence,  or  sighting  date  of 
September  2  ±  1 .2  days.  Ten  Florida  records  (eight  representing  eclosions)  occur 
earlier  (mean  date  =  July  1 1  ±  16.4  days),  indicating  late  spring  or  summer  cross- 
es. For  six  other  19th  century  specimens  the  collection  dates  were  not  recorded. 
The  northern  June  records  (n=3),  shown  in  Fig.  5,  also  most  likely  represent 
either  late  summer  or  early  fall  matings,  since,  all  adult  admirals  eclosing  this 
early  in  the  season  must  have  arisen  from  partly  grown  (third  instar)  larvae  which 
have  over-wintered  in  hibernacula. 


96  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Apparently,  both  ecological  and  premating  isolating  mechanisms  which  usu- 
ally serve  to  keep  the  two  species  separated  tend  to  break  down  in  the  late  sum- 
mer and  fall  portion  of  the  year  throughout  most  of  the  U.  S.  This  in  part  may  be 
related  to  the  late  season  decreasing  photoperiod,  which  induces  many  admiral 
butterfly  larvae  of  both  species  to  diapause  in  the  third  instar,  thus  contributing 
to  a  scarcity  of  adults,  and  consequently  of  potential  mates  (Platt  and  Greenfield 
1974).  However,  Schiefer  1999  notes  situations  in  Mississippi  when  hybrid 
"rubidus"  were  sighted,  even  though  both  species  were  exceptionally  common. 

The  two  parental  butterflies  mimic  two  different  unpalatable  models:  L. 
archippus  mimics  Danaus plexippus  (L.)  (a  Miillerian  relationship),  whereas,  L. 
arthemis  astyanax  mimics  Battus  philenor  (L.)  (a  Batesian  relationship).  Thus, 
the  Fi  phenotype  of  hybrid  "rubidus"  represents  a  complete  breakdown  of  both 
of  these  model-mimic  relationships.  As  such,  these  interspecific  hybrids  must  be 
at  a  considerable  selective  disadvantage,  when  compared  to  males  of  either  of  the 
parental  species.  Their  visual  and  structural  morphology  and  their  behaviors  like- 
ly are  intermediate  as  well.  Their  female  counterparts  have  not  been  reported  in 
nature,  so  that  the  continuation  of  this  form  as  a  species  is  unlikely. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  authors  wish  to  thank  Mr.  G.  C.  Ford  and  Ms.  Fran  Baldwin  of  the  U.M.B.C.  Graphics 
Department  in  Biological  Sciences  for  preparing  the  figures  and  graph  for  this  paper. 

Ms.  C.  Wilkens  and  Ms.  A.  Ellis,  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  U.M.B.C.  assisted  with  the 
final  preparation  of  the  manuscript.  The  senior  author  greatly  appreciates  having  received  the  New 
Mexican  hybrid  "rubidus"  specimen  from  Dr.  M.  E.  Toliver  of  Eureka  College,  Eureka,  Illinois,  and 
the  information  about  its  collection  provided  by  Mr.  S.  J.  Gary.  Finally,  we  wish  to  thank  Dr.  B.  P. 
Bradley  and  Dr.  F.  E.  Hanson  of  the  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  UMBC,  and  Mr.  S.  J. 
Harrison  of  The  Johns  Hopkins  Medical  Institute  in  Baltimore,  for  critically  evaluating  the  manu- 
script. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bailowitz,  R.  A.  and  J.  P.  Brock.  1991.  Butterflies  of  Southeastern  Arizona.  Sonoran  Arthropod 
Studies,  Inc.,  Tuscon,  Arizona.  342  pp. 

Boyd,  B.  M.,  B.  M.  Boyd,  and  G.  T.  Austin.  1999.  Hybridization  of  Limenitis  in  the  western  Great 
Basin  (Lepidoptera:  Nymphalidae).  Holarctic  Lepidoptera  6:37-74. 

Covell,  C.  V.,  Jr.  1 994.  Field  observations  of  matings  between  female  Limenitis  archippus  and  male 
L.  arthemis  subspecies  (Nymphalidae).  Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  48:199-204. 

Covell,  C.  V.,  Jr.  1998.  1998  field  trip  review.  Kentucky  Lepidopterist  25(  1 ):  1-3. 

de  Boer,  G.  and  F.  E.  Hanson.  1984.  Foodplant  selection  and  induction  of  feeding  preference 
among  host  and  non-host  plants  in  larvae  of  the  tobacco  hornworm  Manduca  sexta.  Entomologia 
Expecimentalis  et  Applicata.  353:177-193. 

Hanson,  F.  E.  1976.  Comparative  studies  on  induction  of  food  choice  preferences  in  lepidopterous 
larvae.  Symposia  Biologica  Hungarica  16:71-77. 

Holdridge,  L.  I.  1899.  A  hybrid  between  Limenitis  Ursula  and  L.  archippus.  Entomological  News 
105:131. 

Klots,  A.  B.  1959.  A  mixed  mating  of  two  species  of  Limenitis  Fabricius  (Lepidoptera:  Nympha- 
lidae). Journal  of  the  New  York  Entomological  Society  67:20. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 97_ 

Masters,  J.  H.  1972.  A  proposal  for  the  treatment  of  infrasubspecific  variation  by  lepidopterists. 
Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  26:249-260. 

Mead,  T.  L.  1872.  Description  of  a  remarkable  variety  of  Limenitis  misippus.  Canadian 
Entomologist  4:216-217. 

Platt,  A.  P.  1975.  Monomorphic  mimicry  in  nearctic  Limenitis  butterflies:  experimental  hybridiza- 
tion of  the  L.  arthemis-astyanax  complex  with  L.  archippus.  Evolution  29:120-141 . 

Platt,  A.  P.  1983.  Evolution  of  North  American  admiral  butterflies  (Limenitis:  Nymphalidae). 
Bulletin  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  29:10-22. 

Platt,  A.  P.  1987.  Recent  observations  of  North  American  admirals.  Maryland  Entomologist  3:18- 
20. 

Platt,  A.  P.  and  J.  C.  Greenfield.  1971.  Inter-specific  hybridization  between  Limenitis  arthemis 
astyanax  and  L.  archippus  (Nymphalidae).  Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  24:278-284. 

Platt,  A.  P.  and  J.  C.  Greenfield.  1974.  Report  of  the  capture  of  an  additional  hybrid  between 
Limenitis  arthemis  astyanax  and  L.  archippus.  Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  28:72-75. 

Platt,  A.  P.  and  S.  J.  Harrison.  1994.  First  record  of  an  heterotic  adult  female  Limenitis 
(Basilarchia)  "rubidus"  (Strecker)  (Lepidoptera:  Nymphalidae).  Entomological  News  105:33-38. 

Platt,  A.  P.  and  J.  R.  Maudsley.  1994.  Continued  interspecific  hybridization  between  Limenitis 
(Basilarchia)  arthemis  astyanax  and  L.  (B.  )  archippus  in  the  southeastern  U.S.  Journal  of  the 
Lepidopterists'  Society  48:190-198. 

Platt,  A.  P.,  L.  D.  Miller,  and  J.  Y.  Miller,  in  review.  Possible  natural  backcrossing  of  male  inter- 
specific admiral  hybrid  "arthechippus"  x  L.  archippus  [Limenitis  (Basilarchia):  Nymphalidae]. 

Platt,  A.  P.,  G.  W.  Rawson,  and  G.  Balogh.  1978.  Inter-specific  hybridization  involving  Limenitis 
archippus  and  its  congeneric  species  (Nymphalidae).  Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society 
32:289-303. 

Ritland,  D.  B.  1990.  Localized  interspecific  hybridization  between  mimetic  Limenitis  butterflies 
(Nymphalidae).  Journal  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  44:163-173. 

Schiefer,T.  L.  1999.  First  records  of  interspecific  hybrids  between  two  Limenitis  spp.  in  Mississip- 
pi. News  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  41:  99. 

Strecker,  H.  1878.  Lepidoptera,  Rhopalocera,  and  Heteroceras,  Indigenous  and  Exotic,  with 
Descriptions  and  Colored  Illustrations.  Published  by  the  Author.  Reading.  PA,  U.S.A.  143  pp. 
(plus  later  Supplements). 

Note  added  in  proof:  Additional  records  of  Limenitis  hybrid  "rubidus"  which 
have  been  reported  since  our  manuscript  was  first  submitted  include  two  male 
specimens  of  the  dark  morph  from  central  Missouri  (Elder,  2000),  one  of  which 
was  collected  in  the  early  1950s.  Two  other  dark  morphs  (one  very  flight- worn) 
were  reported  from  southern  Louisiana  (Ross  and  Marks,  2002).  One  of  these 
also  is  an  older  record.  Both  of  these  accounts  appear  in  the  News  of  the  Lepi- 
dopterists' Society  44  (2):  64-65  and  44(4):112-1 14,  respectively.  The  two 
recently  collected  specimens  are  illustrated  in  color.  The  new  Missouri  specimen 
was  collected  on  May  5,  2000,  and  the  one  from  Louisiana  was  taken  on  July  29, 
2000.  Finally,  Schiefer  [2000,  News  of  the  Lepidopterists'  Society  42(1  ):29]  re- 
ported another  dark  form  of  this  insect  from  Mississippi.  These  records  are  not 
included  in  this  paper,  but  they  add  five  specimens  and  two  additional  states  to 
the  distribution  of  this  rather  uncommon  interspecific  hybrid  form. 


98  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


CIRROSPILUS  NEOTROPICUS  SP.  N. 
(HYMENOPTERA:  EULOPHIDAE):  AN  INDIGENOUS 
BIOCONTROL  AGENT  OF  THE  CITRUS  LEAFMINER, 

PHYLLOCNISTIS  CITRELLA 
(LEPIDOPTERA:  GRACILLARIIDAE)  IN  ARGENTINA1 

Patricia  A.  Diez2  and  Patricio  Fidalgo23 

ABSTRACT:  A  complex  of  native  parasitoids  has  been  found  to  attack  the  citrus  leafminer,  Phyllo- 
cnistis  citrella  Stainton,  since  its  introduction  into  Argentina.  Cirrospilus  neotropicus  n.  sp.  is  the 
most  abundant  indigenous  parasitoid,  with  low  but  significant  parasitism  levels.  Cirrospilus  neotrop- 
icus n.  sp.  and  the  introduced  exotic  species,  Ageniaspis  citricola  Logvinovskaya,  are  the  main 
providers  of  biological  control  in  the  citrus  orchards  of  northwestern  Argentina.  The  new  species,  C. 
neotropicus,  is  described  and  the  main  morphological  characters  of  both  sexes  are  illustrated. 
Diagnostic  characters  are  given  which  distinguish  C.  neotropicus  from  the  Asiatic  C.  ingenuus 
Gahan,  which  has  been  mentioned  in  recent  literature  as  similar  to  C.  neotropicus,  and  from  C .flori- 
densis  Evans,  an  eulophid  recently  described  from  Florida,  USA. 

KEY  WORDS:  Cirrospilus  neotropicus  n.  sp.,  Hymenoptera,  Eulophidae,  biological  control.  Citrus 
Leafminer,  Phyllocnistis  citrella,  Lepidoptera,  Gracillariidae 

After  the  introduction  of  the  citrus  leafminer  (CLM)  into  Argentina  in  1996, 
some  six  species  of  parasitoids  were  commonly  recorded  as  attacking  this  pest: 
Elachertus  sp.,  Closterocerus  sp.,  Cirrospilus  sp.,  Sympiesis  sp.,  Galeopsomyia 
fausta  La  Salle  and  Elasmus  sp.  (Eulophidae)  (Frias  and  Diez,  1997;  La  Salle 
and  Pena,  1998;  Schauff  et  al.,  1998;  Fernandez  et  al.,  1999a).  One  year  later 
(1997),  Ageniaspis  citricola  Logvinoskaya  (Encyrtidae)  was  discovered  in 
Tucuman  province:  a  case  of  ecesis  in  biological  control  (Diez  et  al.,  2000; 
Fernandez  et  al.,  1999b).  Nevertheless,  in  1998  this  parasitoid  was  introduced 
again  into  citrus  orchards  in  Tucuman  using  stock  obtained  in  Peru  (Figueroa  et 
al.,  1999).  The  performance  of  the  above  mentioned  parasitoids  was  evaluated 
by  Diez  et  al.  (2000)  and  Diez  (2001)  who  observed  that  A.  citricola  is  the  most 
important  biological  control  agent  of  the  pest  with  a  high  level  of  parasitism 
(54%);  followed  by  a  single  native  parasitoid  Cirrospilus  sp.  (19%).  The  other 
parasitoids  are  very  uncommon  and  only  occasionally  are  reared  from  the  CLM. 
The  species  of  Cirrospilus  obtained  from  the  CLM  in  Argentina  has  a  wide  dis- 
tribution in  the  Neotropical  region,  from  Mexico  to  Argentina,  and  was  record- 
ed in  the  literature,  as  "Cirrospilus  sp.  C",  from  Argentina,  Brazil,  Colombia, 
Honduras  and  Mexico  (Schauff  et  al.,  1998).  Bautista  et  al.  (1996)  mentioned 
this  species  as  "C.  cuadristriatus"  and  Perales  et  al.  (1996a,  1996b)  as  "C. 
quadristriatus  [=C.  ingenuus]"  but  Schauff  et  al.  (1998)  considered  it  to  be  an 
undescribed  species  and  designated  it  as  "Cirrospilus  sp.  C."  The  paper  by 


1  Received  on  November  26,  2002.  Accepted  on  December  14,  2003. 

:  PROIMI-Biotecnologfa,  Pje  Caseros  y  Avda  Belgrano,  4000,  S.  M.  de  Tucuman,  Tucuman,  Argen- 
tina. E-mail:  pdiez2000@yahoo.com. 

'CRILAR,  Entre  Ri'os  y  Mendoza,  5301  Anillaco,  La  Rioja,  Argentina.  E-mail:  pfidalgo@crilar- 
conicet.com.ar. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 99_ 

Schauff  et  al.  (1998)  has  facilitated  enormously  the  identification  of  natural  ene- 
mies of  the  CLM  in  all  parts  of  the  world  where  it  is  present.  We  describe  this 
important  indigenous  CLM  parasitoid  as  a  new  species  in  order  to  facilitate  its 
recognition  and  permit  its  evaluation.  The  morphological  terms  used  here  follow 
Gibson  (1997). 

Cirrospilus  neotropicus  Diez  and  Fidalgo,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-3,5-6,8,  10-12) 

Cirrospilus  sp.  C,  Schauff  et  al.,  1998:  101 1 . 
Bautista  el  al.,  1996:73  as  C.  Cuodristriotus. 
Perales  et  al.,  1996a:  93  -  1996b:  349-350,  as  C.  quadristriatus. 

Description.  Female  holotype:  Coloration  (Figs.  2,  3,  11).  Body  yellow  with  the  following  areas 
dark  brown:  radicle  and  antennal  flagellum  (basal  half  of  pedicel  dark  but  lighter  than  flagellum), 
apex  of  mandible,  transverse  line  above  occipital  foramen  (Fig.  3),  small  spot  on  neck  of  pronotum, 
small  spot  around  mesothoracic  spiracle,  notauli,  transcutal  articulation,  small  spot  laterally  on  me- 
tanotum,  dorsal  setae  of  prothorax  and  mesothorax,  posterior  margin  of  propleuron,  small  spot  on  up- 
per mesepimeron,  basal  half  of  petiole,  two  lateral  spots  on  first  tergite  of  gaster,  a  transverse  band 
located  at  the  posterior  margin  of  tergite  2nd  and  anterior  margin  of  3rd,  another  similar  band  in  3rd- 
4th  tergites,  4th-5th  tergites  and  5th-6th  tergites  (last  band  curving  backwards  laterally),  and  third  val- 
vulae  (Fig.  11).  Wings  hyaline  except  venation  and  setae  dark  brown,  parastigma  with  a  hyaline 
break.  Structure.  Body  length:  1 .68  mm;  all  parts  of  body  with  shallow  more  or  less  hexagonal  retic- 
ulation. Head:  antenna  attached  at  level  of  lower  margin  of  eye,  radicle  short  (about  as  long  as  wide), 
scape  4x  as  long  as  wide  in  lateral  or  dorsal  view,  first  funicular  segment  about  as  long  as  pedicel  and 
a  little  longer  than  the  second,  clava  with  a  terminal  spine;  all  funicular  segments  and  clava  with  lon- 
gitudinal sensilla,  some  of  them,  particularly  on  the  apical  segments,  with  their  apices  projecting  free- 
ly above  surface  (Fig.  2);  mushroom-shaped  capitate  peg  sensilla  present  apically  between  longitu- 
dinal sensilla  on  all  funicular  segments  and  on  first  and  second  segments  of  clava,  a  single  one  sen- 
sillum  on  the  last  segment  of  clava  (Fig.  2);  maxillary  and  labial  palpi  one  segmented,  labium  with 
one  seta  (Fig.  3);  mandible  with  2  external  large  and  4  internal  small  teeth;  malar  sulcus  present  (lin- 
eal); compound  eyes  with  hairs  between  facets.  Mesosoma:  prosternum  closed  by  cervicalia;  prepec- 
tus  subtriangular  in  shape;  anterior  third  of  notauli  converging  posteriorly,  but  becoming  almost  par- 
allel in  the  posterior  two  thirds;  placoid  sensilla  of  scutellum  small  and  round,  located  about  halfway 
between  anterior  and  posterior  pairs  of  setae;  propodeum  with  a  prominent  medial  carina  and  plicae 
along  anterior  and  posterior  margins  (also  with  small  carinae  laterally),  callus  with  9-10  setae;  en- 
dophragma  apically  notched,  its  end  at  the  level  of  posterior  margin  of  propodeum.  Hind  coxae  vague 
on  outer  side.  Fore  wing:  length  2.2x  its  maximum  width;  submarginal  vein  0.8x  length  of  margin- 
al vein;  stigmal  vein  0.2x  length  of  marginal  vein,  stigma  extending  beyond  base  of  uncus  (~  2  uncus- 
lengths),  uncus  distinctly  recurved  (Fig.  8);  postmarginal  vein  0.8x  length  of  stigmal  vein  (Fig.  8); 
parastigma  with  paired  sensilla  in  the  hyaline  break,  costal  cell  with  more  setae  on  the  distal  upper 
margin  than  in  the  ventral  surface,  marginal  fringe  short,  less  than  0. 1  x  maximum  width  of  fore  wing. 
Metasoma:  petiole  small,  0.3x  as  long  as  broad,  smooth  and  conical  in  shape,  ovipositor  length  1 .7x 
length  of  hind  tibia. 

Male.  Body  length:  0.7-1 .25  mm.  Similar  to  female  in  structure  and  coloration  (Fig.  1 ,  3,  10),  except 
antennal  flagellum  with  fewer  longitudinal  sensilla,  whose  apices  do  not  project  freely  above  the  sur- 
face (Fig.  1 ),  and  in  45  of  specimens  there  is  a  dark  brown  central  spot  on  the  scutellum  and  the  axil- 
la (Fig.  12).  Genitalia  as  in  figures  5  and  6;  aedeagus  length  1 .1  x  length  of  genital  capsule;  apex  of 
digitus  sharp-pointed  and  with  one  digital  spine  (Fig.  5). 

Morphological  variation.  Males  vary  primarily  in  the  degree  of  coloration  of 
the  mesosoma:  6.2%  of  the  specimens  lack  the  central  spot  on  the  scutellum  and 
one  specimen  has  three  spots  on  the  propodeum.  Both  females  and  males  some- 


100 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  1-7.  Cirrospilus  neotropicus  n.  sp.  (1,  2,  3,  5,  and  6),  Cirrospilus  ingennus  Gahan 
(4,  7).  1  antenna  Cf ;  2  flagellum  9;  3  head  in  posterior  view;  4  head  in  posterior  view; 
5  aedeagus;  6  genital  capsule;  7  digitus. 


times  have  the  anterior,  median  and  posterior  carinae  of  the  propodeum  light 
brown  rather  than  dark  brown.  Females  and  males  also  vary  in  the  number  of 
setae  on  the  midlobe  of  the  mesoscutum. 

Type  material  of  C.  neotropicus  n.  sp.  is  deposited  in  the  Collections  of:  IMLA  Instituto  Miguel 
Lillo,  Tucuman,  Argentina:  9  Holotype  and  15  9  and  12  Cf  Paratypes;  MCNLP  Museo  de  Ciencias 
Naturales  de  La  Plata,  Argentina:  1  9  and  '  Cf  Paratypes;  USNM  United  States  National  Museum, 
Washington,  DC:  1  9  ar|d  1  Cf  Paratypes;  FSCA  Florida  State  Collections  of  Arthropods,  Gainesville, 
Florida,  USA:  1  9  and  1  Cf  Paratypes;  BMNH  British  Museum  of  Natural  History,  London:  1  9  and 
1  Cf  Paratypes. 

Specimens  studied.  All  specimens  were  reared  from  Phyllocnistis  citrella  on  citrus.  Holotype 
female,  Argentina:  TUCUMAN:  Horco  Molle,  1-1-2000,  P.  Diez  and  E.  Frfas  coll.;  Paratypes: 


Vol.  114.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


101 


8 


13 


Figs.  8-13.  Cirrospilus  neotropicus  n.  sp.  (8,  10  -  12),  Cirrospilus  ingenuus  Gahan  (9, 
13).  8  postmarginal  and  stigmal  veins;  9  postmarginal  and  stigmal  veins;  10  gaster  mm; 
11  gaster  ff;  12  thorax  ff;  13  anterior  half  of  thorax  showing  notauli. 


TUCUMAN:  Horco  Molle,  1-II-2000.  P.  Diez  and  E.  Frias  coll.  (1  Cf).  CATAMARCA:  Villa  Capa- 
yan  (ca.  Concepcion),  4-II-2000,  O.  Luque  col.  (5  9  y  6  Cf ):  Colonia  del  Valle,  4-II-2000.  O.  Luque 
col.  (8  9  y  3  Cf );  26-11-2003,  O.  Luque  col.  (7  9  y  7  ~cf ). 

Distribution.  Neotropical,  from  Mexico  to  Argentina  (Schauff  et  al.,  1998): 
Mexico,  Honduras,  Colombia,  Brasil,  Argentina,  and  Bolivia  (new  record).  In 
Argentina  it  is  present  in  the  provinces  of  Salta  (Los  Tucanes,  Ruta  Nacional  34, 
km.  1,286),  JUJUY  (Finca  Lucero,  ca.  Ledesma;  Yuto),  TUCUMAN  (Horco 
Molle,  S.  M.  de  Tucuman,  Tafi  Viejo),  CHACO  (Makalle),  SANTA  FE  (Villa 
Ocampo)  and  CATAMARCA  (Colonia  del  Valle,  Villa  Capayan). 


102  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Etymology.  This  species  is  named  for  the  Neotropical  region  where  C.  neo- 
tropicus  n.  sp  is  widely  present. 

Remarks.  According  to  Schauff  et  al.  (1998)  "this  species  is  very  similar  in 
coloration  to  C.  ingenuus  Gahan,  but  is  distinct  on  morphological  characters." 
C.  ingenuus  is  native  to  Asia  and  was  introduced  in  Florida  (USA)  where  it  is 
apparently  established  (La  Salle  et  al.,  1999).  Recently  Evans  (1999)  described 
C.  floridensis  reared  from  CLM  in  Florida  so  there  are  at  present  three  known 
species  of  Cirrospilus  attacking  CLM  in  the  New  World.  After  studying  five 
specimens  (3  9  and  2  Cf )  of  C.  ingenuus  from  USA  (Florida,  Homestead,  26-vii- 
2000,  P.  Diez  col.,  Ex  P.  citrella  on  citrus)  and  based  on  the  Gahan  (1932) 
description  and  on  Evans'  description  of  C.  floridensis,  we  observed  the  follow- 
ing differences  in  these  species  which  we  present  in  the  following  key: 

1  Notauli  converging  distinctly  posteriorly  as  they  reach  hind  margin  of  mesoscutum  (Fig.  13); 
propodeum  very  coarsely  sculptured,  (as  the  hind  coxae  on  the  outer  side),  with  a  delicate  medi- 
an carina  but  without  lateral  folds;  stigma  not  extending  much  beyond  base  of  uncus;  uncus  only 
slightly  recurved;  postmarginal  vein  1.2x  longer  than  the  stigmal  vein;  male  genitalia  with  the 
apex  of  the  digitus  rounded  and  with  two  digital  spines  (Fig.  7);  dark  spot  (sunglasses-shaped 
spot)  around  occipital  foramen  (Fig.  4)  Cirrospilus  ingenuus  Gahan 

•  Notauli  converging  posteriorly  in  it  first  third,  but  becoming  almost  parallel  as  they  reach  hind 
margin  of  mesoscutum  (Fig.  12);  propodeum  with  a  prominent  median  carina  (smooth  on  anteri- 
or half  and  with  minute  carinae  on  the  posterior  half),  hind  coxae  with  shallow  sculpture;  stigma 
extending  beyond  base  of  uncus  (~  2  uncus-lengths),  uncus  distinctly  recurved;  postmarginal  vein 
always  shorter  than  stigmal  vein;  male  genitalia  with  the  apex  of  digitus  sharp  and  with  one  dig- 
ital spine  (unknown  in  C.  floridensis)  (Fig.  5);  dark  spot  around  occipital  foramen  absent,  only  a 
line  dorsal  (Fig.  3) 2 

2  Female:  first  tergite  of  gaster  with  two  dark  spots  on  each  lateral  margin.  Male:  gaster  with  two 
dark  transverse  bands  medially  on  dorsum.  Both  mesoscutum  with  a  dark  band  along  anterior  and 
posterior  margin Cirrospilus  floridensis  Evans 

•  Female:  first  tergite  of  gaster  with  one  dark  spot  on  each  lateral  margin  (Fig.  10).  Male:  gaster 
with  one  dark  tranverse  band  medially  on  dorsum  (Fig.  10);  both:  mesoscutum  without  dark 
bands  Cirrospilus  neotropicus  Diez  and  Fidalgo 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  John  LaSalle  (CSIRO.  Canberra,  Australia)  and  Gregory  A.  Evans  (University  of 
Florida,  Gainesville,  USA)  for  reviewing  this  manuscript  and  helping  with  diagnostic  characters  of 
C.  ingenuus  and  C.  floridensis;  Charles  Porter  and  Lionel  Stange  (USDA  Florida,  Gainesville,  USA) 
for  reviewing  this  manuscript.  Funds  for  this  research  were  provided  by  the  National  Research 
Council  of  Argentina  (CONICET)  (Project  #0702  /  98)  and  are  greatly  appreciated. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bautista-M.  N.,  L.  Carrillo-S.,  H.  Bravo-M.,  J.  Romero-N.,  and  S.  Pineda-G.   1 996.  Native  par 
asitoids  of  the  citrus  leaf  miner  found  at  Cuitlahuac,  Veracruz,  Mexico.  In,  M.  Hoy  (ed.).  Manag- 
ing the  Citrus  Leafminer.  Proceedings  from  an  International  Conference,  Orlando,  Florida,  April 
23-25  1996.  p.  73  (Abstract). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 103 

Diez,  P.  A.,  P.  Fidalgo,  and  E.  Fn'as.  2000.  Ageniaspis  citricola  (Hymenoptera:  Encyrtidae),  para- 
sitoide  especifico  de  Phyllocnistis  citrella  (Lepidoptera:  Gracillariidae):  introduccion  y  datos  pre- 
liminares  sobre  su  desempefio  en  La  Argentina.  Acta  Entomologica  Chilena  24:69-76. 

Diez,  P.  A.  2001.  Estructura  del  complejo  de  parasitoides  (Hymenoptera)  de  Phyllocnistis  citrella 
Stainton  (Lepidoptera:  Gracillariidae)  atacando  limoneros  en  el  Depto.  Tafi  viejo,  provincia  de 
Tucuman.  Disertacion  de  Tesis  de  Maestria,  Centra  Regional  de  Investigaciones  Cientificas  y 
Transferencia  Tecnologica  de  La  Rioja,  Universidad  Nacional  de  La  Rioja,  Argentina.  98  pp. 

Evans,  G.  A.  1999.  A  new  species  of  Cirrospilus  (Hymenoptera:  Eulophidae)  and  two  new  syn- 
onymies of  parasitoids  reared  from  the  citrus  leafminer,  Phyllocnistis  citrella  (Lepidoptera:  Gra- 
cillariidae). Florida  Entomologist  82  (3):  448-453. 

Fernandez,  R.,  L.  Ghiggia,  P.  Fidalgo,  A.  Jaime  de  Herrero,  P.  A.  Diez,  and  E.  Willink.  1999a. 
Parasitoides  de  Phvllocnistis  citrella  Stainton  (Lepidoptera-Gracillariidae)  y  su  distribution  en  el 
agroecosistema  citrico  de  Tucuman,  Argentina.  Resumen  X  Jornadas  Fitosanitarias  Argentinas,  S. 
S.  de  Jujuy,  abril  de  1999.  p.  248  (Abstract). 

Fernandez,  R,  L.  Ghiggia,  A.  Jaime  de  Herrero,  E.  Willink,  H.  Guerrero  de  Villafane,  D.  Fi- 
gueroa,  J.  Fernandez,  and  P.  Zamudio.  1999b.  Ageniaspis  citricola  Logvinovskaya  (Hymen- 
optera-Encyrtidae)  parasitoide  de  Phyllocnistis  citrella  Stainton  (Lepidoptera-Gracillariidae)  en 
Tucuman,  Argentina.  Resumen  X  Jornadas  Fitosanitarias  Argentinas.  S.  S.  de  Jujuy,  abril  de 
1999.  p.  250  (Abstract). 

Figueroa,  D.,  E.  Willink,  P.  Zamudio,  and  H.  Salas.  1999.  Control  biologico  del  minador  de  las 
hojas  de  los  citricos.  Resumen  X  Jornadas  Fitosanitarias  Argentinas.  S.  S.  de  Jujuy,  abril  de  1999. 
p.  276  (Abstract). 

Frias,  E.  and  P.  A.  Diez.  1994-1996  (1997).  Parasitoides  (Eulophidae,  Elasmidae)  natives  del 
minador  de  las  hojas  de  los  citricos  (Phyllocnistis  citrella  Stainton)  (Lep.:  Gracillariidae)  encon- 
trados  en  la  provincia  de  Tucuman.  CIRPON  Revista  de  Investigaciones  10(l-4):59-60. 

Gahan,  A.  1932.  Miscellaneous  descriptions  and  notes  on  parasitic  Hymenoptera.  Annals  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  America  25:753. 

Gibson,  G.  A.  P.  1997.  Morphology  and  Terminology,  Chapter  2,  pp.  16-44.  //;,  G.  P.  Gibson,  J.  T. 
Huber  and  J.  B.  Woolley,  eds.).  Annotated  Keys  to  the  Genera  of  Nearctic  Chalcidoidea  (Hy- 
menoptera). NRC  Research  Press.  Ottawa,  Canada. 

LaSalle,  J.,  R.  E.  Duncan,  and  J.  E.  Pena.  1999.  The  recovery  and  apparent  establishment  of 
Cirrospilus  ingenuus  (Hymenoptera:  Eulophidae)  in  Florida.  Florida  Entomologist  82(2):371- 
373. 

LaSalle,  J.  and  J.  E.  Pena.  1998.  A  new  species  of  Galeopsomyia  (Hymenoptera:  Eulophidae: 
Tetrastichinae):  a  fortuitous  parasitoid  of  the  citrus  leafminer,  Phyllocnistis  citrella  (Lepidoptera: 
Gracillariidae).  Florida  Entomologist  80(4):46 1-470. 

Perales  Gutierrez,  M.  A.,  H.  C.  Arredondo  Bernal,  and  E.  Garza  Gonzalez.  1996a.  Parasitoids 
of  citrus  leafminer  in  Colima,  Mexico.  //;.  M.  Hoy  (ed.).  Managing  the  Citrus  Leafminer.  Pro- 
ceedings from  an  International  Conference.  Orlando.  Florida.  April  23-25  1996.  p.  93  (Abstract). 

Perales  Gutierrez,  M.  A.,  H.  C.  Arredondo  Bernal,  E.  Garza  Gonzalez,  and  L.  A.  Aguirre  Uribe. 

1996b.  Native  parasitoids  of  the  citrus  leafminer  Phyllocnistis  citrella  Stainton  in  Colima,  Mexi- 
co. Southwestern  Entomologist  21:349-350. 

Schauff,  M.  E.,  J.  LaSalle,  and  G.  A.  Wijesekara.  1998.  The  genera  of  Chalcid  Parasitoids  (Hy- 
menoptera: Chalcidoidea)  of  Citrus  Leafminer  Phyllocnistis  citrella  Stainton  (Lepidoptera:  Gra- 
cillariidae). Journal  of  Natural  History  32:1001-1056. 


THE  AMERICAN   ENTOMOLOGICAL   SOCIETY 
APPLICATION     FOR     MEMBERSHIP 

Membership  coincides  with  the  calendar  year  running  from  January  1  to  December  31.  If  joining 
midyear,  back  issues  will  be  mailed.  Unless  requested  otherwise,  membership  application  received 
after  October  1  will  be  credited  to  the  following  year. 


DUES  FOR  2004: 

Regular:  $20 
Student:  $12 


$ 


Students  must  provide  proof  of  student  status 

Paid  membership  dues  are  required  for  the 
following  member's  subscription  rates: 

D   ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Vol.  114  @  $15.00  per  year:       $ 


D  TRANSACTIONS  OF  TAES 
Vol.  130  @  $15.00  per  year:       $ 


P" 

£ '•/;, 


•y 


Total: 


$ 


• 


NAME 


ADDRESS 


CITY 


STATE 


ZIP 


E-MAIL    (PLEASE  PRINT  CLEARLY] 


TELEPHONE 


D  Check  or  money  order  (in  US  currency  through  a  US  bank) 
payable  to  The  American  Entomological  Society. 

Credit  card:     D  VISA      D  Discover     D  MasterCard     D  AmEx 


CREDIT  CARD  NUMBER 


EXPIRATION  DATE 


NAME  ON  CARD 


SIGNATURE 


AES  Federal  ID  No.:  23-1599849 

MAIL  FORM  &  PAYMENT  TO: 

The  American  Entomological  Society 
at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

Telephone:  (215)  561-3978 
E-mail:  aes@acnatsci.org 

www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 105 

PERISTENUS  DIGONEUTIS 

(HYMENOPTERA:  BRACONIDAE),  A  PARASITE  OF 
LYGUS  LINEOLARIS  (HEMIPTERA:  MIRIDAE)  IN 

NORTHEASTERN  UNITED  STATES  ALFALFA, 
AND  THE  NEED  FOR  RESEARCH  ON  OTHER  CROPS1 

W.  H.  Day,2  A.  T.  Eaton,3  R.  F.  Romig,4  K.  J.  Tilmon,5  M.  Mayer,*  and  T.  Dorsey6 

ABSTRACT:  The  tarnished  plant  bug  (TPB),  Lygus  lineolaris  (Palisot),  damages  a  wide  variety  of 
important  crops  in  North  America.  Peristenus  digoneutis  Loan,  a  European  parasite  established  to 
provide  biological  control  of  this  plant  bug,  has  reduced  TPB  numbers  in  alfalfa  for  ten  years. 
Damage  to  apple  fruit  in  New  Hampshire  during  the  same  time  period  has  been  reduced  by  63%,  and 
it  appears  that  biological  control  is  responsible  for  this  decrease.  Moderate  to  high  parasitism  rates 
by  P.  digoneutis  have  also  been  observed  in  strawberries,  vetch,  red  clover,  and  weeds.  P.  digoneutis 
is  dispersing  on  its  own,  and  has  been  found  in  62  counties  in  eight  states,  and  in  Canada.  Additional 
research  is  needed  on  the  parasitism  of  L.  lineolaris  on  apples  and  other  crops,  and  on  movement  of 
the  parasite  into  new  areas. 

KEY  WORDS:  Peristenus  digoneutis,  Hymenoptera,  Braconidae,  Lygus  lineolaris,  Hemiptera,  Miri- 
dae,  alfalfa. 

Lygus  lineolaris  (Palisot),  the  tarnished  plant  bug  (TPB)  (Hemiptera:  Miri- 
dae),  is  a  moderate  to  serious  pest  of  a  wide  variety  of  crops— fruits  (Bobb  1970, 
Guest  1999,  Mailloux  and  Bostanian  1988,  Weires  et  al.  1985),  vegetables  (Boi- 
vin  et  al.  1991,  Guest  1999,  Hagle  1978),  crops  grown  for  seed  (Gupta  et  al. 
1980,  Scott  et  al.  1966,  Wise  and  Lamb  1998),  tree  seedlings  (Schowalter  and 
Stein  1987),  and  cotton  (Scott  et  al.  1985).  Large  numbers  of  TPB  often  are  pro- 
duced in  forage  crops  (alfalfa  and  red  clover),  but  usually  they  are  thought  to 
only  damage  these  crops  when  they  are  grown  for  seed.  However,  when  alfalfa 
or  clover  is  harvested  for  hay,  large  numbers  of  adult  TPB  may  fly  into  high- 
value  crops,  where  they  may  cause  serious  yield  and  quality  losses.  For  example, 
apples  are  damaged  when  TPB  adults  puncture  the  small  fruit,  which  later 
become  distorted  at  the  feeding  site  as  the  fruit  grows.  Many  affected  apples  will 
be  so  blemished  or  misshapen  that  they  cannot  be  sold,  or  bring  very  low  prices. 
Peaches,  strawberries,  raspberries  and  blackberries  are  similarly  distorted,  and 
fruit  yield  /  quantity  is  also  reduced. 

Early  research  (Day  1987)  showed  that  parasitism  of  the  TPB,  a  native 
species,  in  alfalfa  by  native  parasites  was  very  low.  Consequently,  parasites  of 
the  European  tarnished  plant  bug  (L.  rugulipennis)  were  collected  by  the  USDA 


1  Received  on  July  16,  2002.  Accepted  December  21 ,  2003. 

:USDA-B1RL,  501  S.  Chapel  Street,  Newark,  DE  19713.  E-mail:  wday@biir.ars.usda.gov. 

1  Plant  Biology  Department,  University  of  New  Hampshire,  Durham.  NH  03824. 

4  West  Chester  State  University.  Present  address:  13  Linda  Lane,  Fleetwood,  PA  19522. 

5  Entomology  Department,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  NY  14853. 
''New  Jersey  Dept.  of  Agriculture,  Trenton,  NJ  08625. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


106  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


European  Biological  Control  Lab,  and  these  were  released  by  WHO  at  two  loca- 
tions in  NJ  and  one  in  DE.  The  plan  was  to  establish  one  or  more  parasites  in 
alfalfa,  because  this  is  a  common  crop  in  the  northeast  U.S.  (10  million  acres), 
so  it  could  serve  as  a  reservoir  for  the  parasite.  Alfalfa  is  especially  suitable 
because  it  is  not  frequently  sprayed  with  insecticides  (due  to  the  successful  bio- 
logical control  of  the  alfalfa  weevil,  blotch  leafminer,  and  pea  aphid  initiated  by 
the  USDA).  Establishment  of  an  effective  parasite  could  reduce  TPB  damage 
indirectly  (via  reduction  in  the  number  of  TPB  adults  leaving  alfalfa  for  suscep- 
tible crops)  or  directly  (by  reducing  TPB  numbers  in  fruit  and  vegetable  crops). 

Peristenus  digoneutis  Loan,  a  small  parasite  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae)  of 
TPB  nymphs,  was  established  in  northwestern  New  Jersey  by  the  first  author  in 
1984  (Day  et  al.  1990).  It  has  two  generations  per  year,  which  attack  the  two 
principal  generations  of  the  TPB,  and  was  soon  killing  50  percent  of  nymphs.  By 
1993  this  parasite  had  been  detected  in  nine  counties,  in  parts  of  four  states  (Fig. 
1,  1993  line).  And,  in  our  long-term  alfalfa  monitoring  fields  in  northwestern 
New  Jersey,  the  parasite  had  reduced  TPB  numbers  by  65%  (Day  1996). 

Peristenus  digoneutis  has  continued  to  disperse  in  all  directions  but  south, 
where  it  is  likely  limited  by  summer  temperatures  (Day  et  al.  2000).  P.  digoneutis 
has  now  been  detected  in  62  counties  in  8  states,  and  in  Canada  (Fig.  1).  The 
objective  of  this  paper  is  to  present  data  on  TPB  damage  to  apples  during  a  20- 
year  period,  which  it  is  hoped  will  stimulate  research  on  other  crops  damaged  by 
the  TPB,  at  locations  where  the  parasite  is  present. 

METHODS 

Tarnished  plant  bug  nymphs  were  collected  in  alfalfa  fields,  using  a  sweep  net, 
near  Blairstown,  New  Jersey  (lat.  4 TOO'  N,  long.  75° 00'  W,  elevation  160- 
290  m).  Three  fields  were  sampled  weekly  with  a  sweep  net  from  early  May 
through  July,  when  this  mirid  is  most  abundant,  and  biweekly  from  August  to 
October.  The  data  in  Figure  2  show  the  average  numbers  of  TPB  nymphs  each 
year:  each  number  is  an  average  of  the  maximum  (peak)  number  sampled  during 
the  first  and  second  generations  (which  usually  occur  in  late  June  and  late  July); 
each  number  per  generation  is  an  average  of  three  fields.  Data  are  presented  for 
19  years.  Additional  details  on  the  sampling  methods  are  in  Day  (1996). 

Each  year,  apples  were  examined  at  harvest,  in  15-28  commercial  orchards 
(avg.  23)  across  New  Hampshire.  An  average  of  11 ,500  apples  (500  per  orchard) 
were  checked  for  defects  per  year,  and  the  percentage  damaged  by  the  TPB  was 
recorded.  The  average  injury  over  all  orchards  each  year,  for  20  years,  is  pre- 
sented in  Figure  3.  The  pre-  and  post-biocontrol  means  for  both  TPB  numbers 
and  apple  damage  were  compared  by  an  analysis  of  variance,  using  years  as 
replicates.  The  percentage  damaged  apples  data  were  normalized  using  the  arc- 
sine  transformation  (Snedecor  1956)  before  the  data  were  analyzed. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


107 


200  km 


Figure  1 .  The  known  distribution  of  Peristenus  digoneutis  in  the  northeastern  United 
States  and  southeastern  Canada  as  of  March  2003.  March  2003.  This  map  is  from  Day  et 
al.  2000,  updated  by  an  additional  13  county  records  obtained  in  2000-2002  (locations  and 
dates  are  in  Table  1).  The  Canadian  records  are  from  Broadbent  et  al.  1999.  The  numbers 
in  the  counties  indicate  where  and  when  the  first  recovery  was  made.  In  most  cases,  this 
was  the  first  attempt  to  detect  this  species,  so  it  had  arrived  earlier.  The  heavy  lines  depict 
the  probable  dispersion  of  the  parasite  by  1993,  1996,  1999,  and  2002. 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Previous  research  (Day  1996)  documented  the  large  increase  in  parasitism  of 
TPB  nymphs  caused  by  P.  digoneutis  from  1985  through  1992,  and  the  rapid 
decrease  in  TPB  numbers  from  1990-1993.  Figure  2  shows  that  the  TPB  has 
remained  at  low  levels  during  the  six  years  (1994-1999)  since  then.  The  overall 
result  is  a  population  reduction  of  65%,  for  eight  consecutive  years. 


108 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Table  1.  New  country  detection  records*  for  P.  digoneutis,  2000-2002 


State      County 

NJ         Mercer 

Gloucester 

NY       Cayuga 

Chenango 

Cortland 

Madison 

Onondaga 

Seneca 

Tompkins 

PA        Northumberland 
Lycoming 
Potter 
Tioga 


Nearest  town        Date 


Pennington 
Aura 


Scipio  Center 

Norwich 

Marathon 

Nelson 

Pompey 

Fayette 

Lansing 

Elysburg 
Calvert 
Brookland 
Wellsboro 


7/29/02 
7/18/02 

6/26/02 
6/24/02 
6/27/02 
6/25/02 
6/25/02 
6/26/02 
6/26/02 

7/27/00 
7/23/01 
7/31/01 
8/01/01 


Author 

Day 

Mayer  &  Dorsey 

Romig 
Romig 
Romig 
Romig 
Romig 
Romig 
Romig 

Romig 
Romig 
Romig 
Romig 


*  Females  were  reared  from  field-collected  nymphs.  Females  are  positive  evidence  of  an  established 
parasite  population  (females  can  only  be  produced  by  mated  female  parents,  so  both  sexes  were 
present). 


During  the  same  time  period,  damage  to  apples  by  the  TPB  decreased  by  a 
similar  amount  (63%)  for  10  years  (Fig.  3).  Although  no  concurrent  TPB  counts 
had  been  made  in  these  orchards,  the  striking  similarity  between  Figs.  2  and  3 
suggests  that  a  general  decrease  in  TPB  numbers  occurred.  The  parasite  was 
numerous  enough  to  be  detected  the  first  year  it  was  looked  for  (1996,  Fig.  1; 
Day  et  al.  2000),  so  it  must  have  been  present  in  New  Hampshire  for  several 
years.  In  addition,  the  high  parasitism  rates  observed  in  alfalfa  (Day  1996),  and 
in  weeds  and  cover  crops  (Tilmon  2001,  RFR  unpubl.),  indicate  that  TPB  num- 
bers should  be  reduced  over  large  areas  — so  fewer  TPB  adults  should  be  avail- 
able to  fly  into  apple  orchards  to  feed  on  (and  injure)  the  young  apples. 

Field  samples  in  the  northeastern  states  by  the  authors  have  found  P. 
digoneutis  parasitizing  significant  numbers  (30%  or  more)  of  TPB  nymphs  in 
alfalfa,  vetch,  strawberries,  and  weeds  (chickweed,  fleabane)  (Tilmon  2001 ,  and 
WHD  unpubl.).  Parasitism  levels  are  now  high  enough  in  several  crops  and 
weeds  that  research  on  the  value  of  biological  control  can  be  conducted  in  many 
northeastern  locations.  Such  studies  are  needed  on  strawberries,  apples,  peaches, 
raspberries,  beans,  and  other  crops.  If  anyone  is  interested  in  starting  cooperative 
or  independent  research,  contact  the  first  author. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


109 


co 

Q. 

LLJ 
111 

co 


§100 


tr 
m 

CL      75 

CO 
I 
ft. 


z 


so- 


2:     25 


111 


000 

o 


0         0 


83 


-T r 

85 


87  89  91  93  95  97  99 

YEAR  (3-year  moving  averages) 


Figure  2.  The  abundance  of  tarnished  plant  bug  nymphs  in  alfalfa,  in  northwest  New 
Jersey,  1983-1999.  The  two  averages  ("before  biocontrol"  and  "after  biocontrol")  are  sta- 
tistically different  (F  =  267;  df  =  7,1;  P  <  0.001). 


5- 


Q 
Itl 

O 


Q 

K 


ft 
U. 


2- 


o      o 


80 


82 


84 


86 


88 


90 


92 


94 


96 


98 


Figure  3.  The  incidence  of  tarnished  plant  bug  injury  to  apples  in  New  Hampshire,  1980- 
1999.  The  "before"  and  "after"  averages  are  statistically  different  (F  =  26.7;  df  =  9.1 ;  P  < 
0.001). 


1 1 0  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  R.  W.  Fuester  and  the  two  reviewers  for  suggestions  to  improve  the  manuscript,  and  we 
thank  B.  R.  Holmes  for  typing.  We  also  appreciate  the  cooperation  of  the  many  growers  who  allowed 
us  to  sample  insects  and  fruit  on  their  farms. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bobb,  M.  L.  1970.  Reduction  of  cat-facing  injury  to  peaches.  Journal  of  Economic  Entomology 
63:1026-1027. 

Boivin,  G.,  J.  LeBlanc,  and  J.  A.  Adams.  1991 .  Spatial  dispersion  and  sequential  sampling  plan 
for  the  tarnished  plant  bug  on  celery.  Journal  of  Economic  Entomology  84:  158-164. 

Broadbent,  A.  B.,  H.  Goulet,  J.  W.  Whistlecraft,  S.  LaChance,  and  P.  G.  Mason.  1999.  First 
Canadian  record  of  3  parasitoid  species  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae:  Euphorinae)  of  the  tarnished 
plant  bug,  Lygus  lineolaris  (Hemiptera:  Miridae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
Ontario  130:109-111. 

Day,  W.  H.  1987.  Biological  control  efforts  against  Lygus  and  Adelphocoris  spp.  infesting  alfalfa  in 
the  United  States,  with  notes  on  other  associated  mirid  species.  In,  R.  C.  Hedlund  and  H.  M. 
Graham  (Editors).  Economic  Importance  and  Biological  Control  of  Lygus  and  Adelphocoris  in 
North  America.  USDA-ARS  64.  pp.  20-39. 

Day,  W.  H.  1996.  An  evaluation  of  biological  control  of  the  tarnished  plant  bug,  Lygus  lineolaris 
(Hemiptera:  Miridae),  in  alfalfa  by  the  introduced  parasite  Peristenus  digoneutis  (Hymenoptera: 
Braconidae).  Environmental  Entomology  25:512-518. 

Day,  W  H.,  R.  C.  Hedlund,  L.  B.  Saunders,  and  D.  Coutinot.  1990.  Establishment  of  Peristenus 
digoneutis  (Hymenoptera:  Braconidae),  a  parasite  of  the  tarnished  plant  bug  (Hemiptera:  Miri- 
dae), in  the  United  States.  Environmental  Entomology  19:1528-1533. 

Day,  W.  H.,  K.  J.  Tilmon,  R.  F.  Romig,  A.  T.  Eaton,  and  K.  D.  Murray.  2000.  Recent  range 
expansions  of  Peristenus  digoneutis,  a  parasite  of  the  tarnished  plant  bug,  and  high  temperatures 
limiting  its  geographic  distribution  in  North  America.  Journal  of  the  New  York  Entomological 
Society  108:326-331. 

Guest,  J.  1999.  Tarnished  plant  bug  is  by  far  Vermont's  most  important  vegetable  and  berry  pest, 
pp.  51  In,  K.  A.  Stoner  (Editor).  Alternatives  to  insecticides  for  managing  vegetable  insects. 
National  Resource,  Agriculture,  and  Engineering  Service.  Cooperative  Extension.  Cornell  Uni- 
versity. Ithaca,  New  York,  U.S.A.  76  pp. 

Gupta,  R.  K.,  G.  Tamaki,  and  C.  A.  Johansen.  1980.  Lygus  bug  damage,  predator-prey  interac- 
tion, and  pest  management  implications  on  alfalfa  grown  for  seed.  Washington  State  University. 
Technical  Bulletin  92.  18  pp. 

Hagel,G.T.  1978.  Lygus  spp.  damage  to  beans  by  reducing  yields,  seed  pitting,  and  control  by  vari- 
etal resistance  and  chemical  sprays.  Journal  of  Economic  Entomology  71:613-615. 

Mailloux,  G.  E.  and  N.  J.  Bostanian.  1988.  Economic  injury  level  model  for  tarnished  plant  bug 
in  strawberry  fields.  Environmental  Entomology  17:581-586. 

Schowalter,  T.  D.and  J.  D.  Stein.  1987.  Influence  of  Douglas-fir  seedling  proximity  to  insect  pop- 
ulation sources  on  susceptibility  to  Lygus  hesperus  in  a  forest  nursery  in  western  Oregon.  En- 
vironmental Entomology  16:984-986. 

Scott,  D.  R.,  A.  J.  Walz,  and  H.  C.  Manis.  1966.  The  effect  of  Lygus  sp.  on  carrot  seed  production 
in  Idaho.  University  of  Idaho.  Agricultural  Research  Bulletin  64.  12  pp. 

Scott,  W.  P.,  J.  W.  Smith,  and  G.  L.  Snodgrass.  1985.  The  tarnished  plant  bug  (Hemiptera: 
Miridae):  A  key  pest  of  cotton  in  the  Mississippi  Delta.  Proceedings  of  the  Beltwide  Cotton  Pro- 
ducers Research  Conference,  pp.  164-167. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 


Snedecor,  G.  W.   1956.  Statistical  Methods.  Iowa  State  College  Press.  Ames,  Iowa,  U.S.A.  534  pp. 

Tilmon,  K.  J.  2001.  Biological  control  of  Lygus  lineolaris  (Hemiptera:  Miridae).  a  generalist  her- 
bivore, by  native  and  introduced  Peristenus  (Hemiptera:  Braconidae).  Ph.D.  Thesis,  Cornell  Uni- 
versity. Ithaca,  New  York,  U.S.A.  125  pp. 

Weires,  R.  W.,  J.  R.  Vankirk,  W.  D.  Gerling,  and  F.  M.  McNicholas.  1 985.  Economic  losses  from 
the  tarnished  plant  bug  on  apple  in  eastern  New  York.  Journal  of  Agricultural  Entomology  2:256- 
263. 

Wise,  I.  L.  and  R.  J.  Lamb.  1998.  Economic  threshold  for  plant  bugs,  Lygus  spp.,  in  canola. 
Canadian  Entomologist  130:825-836. 


1 1 2  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 113 

DITCHING  AT  SEA:  PREDATOR  AVOIDANCE  BY  THE 
ATLANTIC  MARINE  SHORELINE  TIGER  BEETLE, 

C1CINDELA  MARGIN  ATA  F. 
(COLEOPTERA:  CARABIDAE)1 

Foster  Forbes  Purrington' 

ABSTRACT:  The  stenotopic  marine  shoreline  tiger  beetle,  Cicindela  marginata  responds  to  threat, 
presumably  chiefly  from  shore  birds,  in  its  Atlantic  tidal  mud  flats  habitat  by  flying  out  over  salt 
water  and  deliberately  ditching.  After  a  brief  hesitation  it  flies  off  the  water  and  returns  to  shore. 

KEY  WORDS:  Cicindela  marginata,  Coleoptera,  Carabidae,  predator  avoidance. 

Along  the  shoreline  mouth  of  estuarine  Mattapoisett  River  (Mattapoisett, 
Plymouth  County,  Massachusetts),  I  observed  a  population  of  Cicindela  margi- 
nata F.  (Coleoptera:  Carabidae:  Cicindelinae)  on  tidal  mud  flats  colonized  by 
smooth  cordgrass,  Spartina  alterniflora  Loisel;  ribbed  mussel,  Geukensia  demis- 
sa  (Dillwyn);  and  the  mud  fiddler  crab,  Uca  pugnax  (Smith).  When  threatened 
by  my  approach,  these  tiger  beetles  typically  flew  seaward  a  distance  of  circa  5 
meters,  landed  briefly  on  the  saltwater  surface  and  then  flew  back  to  shore,  often 
into  dense  cordgrass  where  they  remained  motionless  for  several  minutes.  My 
observations,  on  July  25,  2003,  extended  for  circa  two  hours  in  bright  sun  and 
light  winds,  during  which  time  I  saw  20  or  so  such  deliberate  ditching  flights. 

DISCUSSION 

While  Cicindelinae  include  many  stenotopic  species  inhabiting  shorelines 
more-or-less  exclusively,  there  are  almost  no  reports  of  water  escape  strategies  to 
avoid  predation.  Larochelle  and  Lariviere  (2001)  state  (without  attribution)  that 
C.  gabbii  (G.H.  Horn)  is  "often  seen  floating  backwards  (sic)  upon  the  ocean 
water  near  its  shore  habitat,"  seeming  to  imply  a  deliberate  predator  avoidance 
ditching  flight  such  as  I  report  herein  for  C.  marginata.  However,  they  do  not 
specify  a  return  flight  to  shore  by  C.  gabbii.  Detailed  population  studies  of  south- 
ern California  stenotopic  marine  shoreline  tiger  beetles  by  Nagano  (1982)  in- 
cluded C.  gabbii  but  he  made  no  mention  of  sea  ditching  escape  behavior,  nor 
did  he  in  his  later  article  on  California  Channel  Islands  cicindelines  (Nagano 
1985).  Cazier  (1954),  in  discussing  that  species,  also  does  not  mention  this 
behavior. 

Ditching  behavior  by  C.  marginata  is  not  mentioned  in  three  recent  local  nat- 
ural histories  of  eastern  cicindelines  (Glaser  1984,  Knisley  and  Schultz  1997, 
Leonard  and  Bell  1999),  and  Gould  (1834)  notes  only  that  adults  retreat  "to  the 
high  grass"  when  threatened,  or  when  the  tide  comes  in.  In  fact,  in  ten  pages 


1  Received  on  December  23,  2003.  Accepted  on  February  17,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Evolution,  Ecology,  and  Organismal  Biology,  The  Ohio  State  University,  300 
Aronoff  Laboratory,  318  W.  12th  Avenue,  Columbus,  Ohio  43210.  E-mail:  purrington.l@osu.edu. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


1 1 4  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


devoted  to  predator  avoidance  and  escape  strategies,  Knisley  and  Schultz  (1997) 
do  not  mention  any  strategy  that  involves  water.  Davis'  (1903)  report  on  Rhode 
Island  tiger  beetles  does  not  include  this  species. 

Pearson  and  Vogler  (2001 )  devote  a  chapter  to  predator  avoidance  by  tiger  bee- 
tles but  make  no  mention  of  water  escape  strategies.  In  their  Appendix  B  (p.  276), 
however,  they  cite  Cummin's  (1992)  report  of  an  elaborate  water  escape  behavior 
by  a  tropical  Megacephalini  species,  Oxycheila  polita  Bates  in  Costa  Rica,  adding 
(without  attribution)  that  of  46  known  congeners  many  other  Oxycheila  species 
use  this  strategy,  although  Cummins  (1992)  does  not  mention  this.  Oxycheila  poli- 
ta forages  along  rocky  edges  of  fast-flowing  streams.  When  approached,  it  jumps 
or  flies  into  turbulent  water  and  is  transported  submerged  up  to  "several  hundred 
feet"  whereupon  it  flies  up  and  out  of  the  water  (Cummins  1992). 

A  less  complex  water  escape  strategy  is  reported  for  C.  marginata  by  Johnson 
(1972)  in  his  anecdotal  Gulf  Coast  travelogue,  collecting  them  in  the  Florida 
Keys  with  some  difficulty  because  they  often  avoided  him  by  flying  out  over  salt 
water,  but  he  does  not  mention  ditching.  In  another  southeastern  tiger  beetle  col- 
lecting travelogue,  Lawton  (1970)  notes  that  of  an  abundant  C.  marginata  popu- 
lation in  the  Florida  Keys,  every  shoreline  escape  flight  was  made  "well  out  over 
the  water  for  some  distance"  rather  than  upbeach  or  inland.  This  same  tactic  is 
reported  for  C.  hamati  monti  Vaurie,  that  flies  out  over  open  water  of  freshwater 
pools  on  South  Padre  Island,  Texas,  to  avoid  predation  (Ideker  1977).  I  have  seen 
C.  repanda  Dejean  do  this  along  sandy  beaches  of  Lake  Erie,  east  of  Cleveland, 
Ohio.  Given  the  very  close  proximity  of  shorelines  to  populations  of  many  tiger 
beetle  species,  it  would  not  be  surprising  if  adults  routinely  made  use  of  water 
overflights  to  evade  collection  by  humans  and  shore  birds. 

Amphibious  behavior  by  tiger  beetle  adults  has  been  reported  in  other  con- 
texts. Larochelle  and  Lariviere  (2001)  mention  that  C.  nevadica  knausii  Leng 
and  C.  willistoni  echo  Casey  enter  shallow  water  (2.5  cm.  deep)  on  foot,  pre- 
sumably to  hunt  for  prey.  Cheiloxia  binotata  Castelnau  flies  in  large  swarms  low 
over  Peruvian  rivers  at  dusk  and  throughout  the  night,  regularly  skating  on  the 
water  surface  in  pursuit  of  prey  (Pearson  1984).  Nocturnal  ocean  foraging  by  a 
tiger  beetle  was  reported  by  Roth  and  Brown  (1980).  They  cited  J.  R.  Hendrick- 
son's  (personal  communication)  report  of  C.  sinaloae  schrammeli  Cazier  landing 
at  night  on  the  Gulf  of  California  six  miles  out  to  feed  on  arrowworms  (Chaetog- 
natha),  some  species  of  which  are  luminescent,  which  may  be  relevant  to  their 
accessibility  to  a  nocturnal  predator.  This  precinctive  subspecies  is  known  only 
from  marine  shorelines  in  Mexico  at  the  head  of  the  Gulf  in  Sonora  and  Baja  Cal- 
ifornia (Cazier  1954). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  David  Pearson  and  Jonathan  Leonard  for  supplying  references  and  useful  comments.  Mont 
Cazier  inspired  me  with  his  enthusiasm  for  insect  biology  and  in  Portal,  Arizona  (U.S.A.)  gracious- 


Vol.  1  14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003  _  115 


ly  shared  a  look  at  his  magnificent  illustrated  opus  on  the  tiger  beetles.  Cathy  J.  Drake  and  David  J. 
Horn  kindly  offered  comments  on  early  drafts. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Cazier,  M.  A.  1954.  A  review  of  the  Mexican  tiger  beetles  of  the  genus  Cicindela  (Coleoptera: 
Cicindelidae).  Bulletin  of  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  103(3):227-309. 

Cummins,  M.  P.  1992.  Amphibious  behavior  of  a  tropical,  adult  tiger  beetle,  Oxycheila  polita 
Bates  (Coleoptera:  Cicindelidae).  Coleopterists  Bulletin  46(2):  144-  151. 

Davis,  C.  A.  1903.  The  Cicindelidae  of  Rhode  Island.  Entomological  News  14:270-273. 

Glaser,  J.  D.  1984.  The  Cicindelidae  (Coleoptera)  of  Maryland.  Maryland  Entomologist  2(4):65- 
76. 

Gould,  A.  A.  1834.  On  the  Cicindelae  of  Massachusetts.  Boston  Journal  of  Natural  History  1:41-54. 
Ideker,  J.   1977.  Field  separation  of  Cicindela  species  by  escape  behavior.  Cicindela  9(2):39-40. 
Johnson,  W.  1972.  "Hit-and-run"  collecting  across  the  gulf  states.  Cicindela  4(1):  19-40. 

Knisley,  C.  B.  and  T.  D.  Schultz.  1997.  The  Biology  of  Tiger  Beetles  and  a  Guide  to  the  Species 
of  the  South  Atlantic  States.  Virginia  Museum  of  Natural  History  Special  Publication  Number  5. 
Martinsville,  Virginia.  209  pp. 

Larochelle,  A.  and  M.-L.  Lariviere.  2001.  Natural  history  of  the  tiger  beetles  of  North  America 
north  of  Mexico.  Cicindela  33(3-4):41-162. 

Lawton,  J.  K.  1970.  Notes  on  collecting  tiger  beetles  in  the  southeastern  United  States.  Cicindela 


Leonard,  J.  G.  and  R.  T.  Bell.  1998.  Northeastern  Tiger  Beetles:  A  Field  Guide  to  Tiger  Beetles  of 
New  England  and  Eastern  Canada.  CRC  Press.  Boca  Raton,  Florida.  176  pp. 

Nagano,  C.  D.  1982.  Population  status  of  the  tiger  beetles  of  the  genus  Cicindela  (Coleoptera: 
Cicindelidae)  inhabiting  the  marine  shoreline  of  southern  California.  Atala  8(2):33-42. 

Nagano,  C.  D.  1985.  Distributional  notes  on  the  tiger  beetles  of  the  California  Channel  Islands 
(Coleoptera:  Cicindelidae)  [pp.  105-112].  In,  A.  S.  Menke  and  D.R.  Miller  (Editors).  Entomology 
of  the  California  Channel  Islands.  Proceedings  of  the  1st  Symposium  of  the  Santa  Barbara  Mu- 
seum of  Natural  History.  Santa  Barbara,  California.  178  pp. 

Pearson,  D.  L.  1984.  The  tiger  beetles  (Coleoptera:  Cicindelidae)  of  the  Tambopata  Reserved  Zone, 
Madre  de  Dios,  Peru.  Revista  Peruana  de  Entomologia  27:15-24.  [1985] 

Pearson,  D.  L.  and  A.  P.  Vogler.  2001  .  Tiger  Beetles:  The  Evolution,  Ecology,  and  Diversity  of  the 
Cicindelids.  Cornell  University  Press.  Ithaca,  New  York.  333  pp. 

Roth,  V.  D.  and  W.  L.  Brown.  1980.  Arthropoda:  Insecta  [pp.  326-346].  In,  R.C.  Brusca,  (Editor). 
Common  Intertidal  Invertebrates  of  the  Gulf  of  California.  University  of  Arizona  Press,  Tucson. 
513pp. 


MEMOIRS 


OF     THE  AMERICAN    ENTOMOLOGICAL   SOCIETY 

NEW!  #44         A  Systematic  Database  of  Thereva 
Latreille  Names:  An  Answer  to  the  Nomenclatural 
Challenge  in  Therevidae  (Insecta:  Diptera) 
by  Kevin  C.  Holston.  86  pp $25 

MEW;  #45        A  Revision  of  the  Caryedontini 
(Coleoptera:  Bruchidae:  Pachymerinae)  of  Africa  and 
the  Middle  East  by  Clarence  Dan  Johnson,  Benjamin  J. 
Southgate  and  Alex  Delobel.  120  pp $30 


#43 


A  World  Revision  of  the  Genus 


Spodoptera  Guenee  (Lepidoptera  Noctuidae) 
Michael  G.  Pogue.  2003.  202  pp $30 

A  complete  list  of  available  Memoirs  can  be  found  at 
www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/memoirs.html 


326 


NAME 


ADDRESS 


Please  send  these  issue(s): 

D  #45  ($25)      $  

D  #44  ($30)      $  

D  #43  ($30)      $  

n  # $ 


# 


CITY 


STATE 


ZIP 


# 


E-MAIL    (PLEASE  PRINT  CLEARLY) 


TELEPHONE 


Postage: 
TOTAL 


$ 
$ 

$ 
$ 


POSTAGE/ 
HANDLING: 
Domestic  orders: 

$3  for  the  first 
publication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

Foreign  orders: 

$5  fee  for  the  first 
publication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

AESFed.IDNo.: 
23-1599849 


D  Check  or  money  order  (in  US  currency  through  a  US  bank) 
payable  to  The  American  Entomological  Society. 

Credit  card:     D  VISA      D  Discover     D  MasterCard     D  AmEx 


CREDIT  CARD  NUMBER 


EXPIRATION  DATE 


MAIL  FORM  &  PAYMENT  TO: 

The  American  Entomological  Society 
at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1  195 

Telephone:  (2  15)  561  -3978 
E-mail:  aes@acnatsci.org 


NAME  ON  CARD 


SIGNATURE 


www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  2.  March  &  April  2003 117 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

FIRST  NEARCTIC  RECORDS  OF  TEMPISQUITONEURA 
(DIPTERA:  CHIRONOMIDAE:  ORTHOCLADIINAE) 

From  Arizona,  USA1 

Gary  T.  Lester,2  Brian  J.  Krestian,2  and  John  H.  Epler1 

Aquatic  macroinvertebrates  are  increasingly  being  used  as  biological  indica- 
tors of  water  and  habitat  quality  in  many  water  quality  programs  throughout 
North  America  (Harbour  et  al.  1999).  The  Western  Environmental  Monitoring 
and  Assessment  Program  (WEMAP)  is  a  four-year  study  of  water  quality  of 
rivers  and  streams  across  12  western  states  being  conducted  by  the  United  States 
Environmental  Protection  Agency  (USEPA).  Included  in  this  study  is  the  collec- 
tion and  taxonomic  analysis  of  aquatic,  benthic  macroinvertebrates.  While  pro- 
cessing benthic  invertebrate  samples  for  this  project,  taxonomists  (BJK  and 
GTL)  at  the  environmental  consulting  firm  Eco Analysts,  Inc.,  encountered  larval 
Chironomidae  that  were  not  represented  in  any  literature  for  North  America. 
Specimens  were  sent  to  the  third  author  (JHE)  for  examination,  whereupon  the 
larvae  were  determined  to  be  Tempi  squitoneura  merrillorum  Epler.  There  are  too 
few  collections  of  T.  merrillorum  as  of  yet  to  determine  any  water  quality  asso- 
ciations for  this  species. 

Tempisquitoneura  merrillorum  was  described  from  specimens  collected  in 
Costa  Rica  (Epler  and  de  la  Rosa  1995).  Larvae  were  reported  to  be  strictly  sym- 
phoretic  on  Corydalus  sp.  larvae,  attaching  themselves  to  either  the  abdominal 
gills  or  thorax  of  the  host.  Pupae  were  found  in  constructed  silken  cases  attached 
laterally  to  the  thorax.  Larvae  and  pupae  collected  in  Arizona  were  found 
attached  to  Corydalus  sp.  larvae  in  a  manner  identical  to  those  reported  from 
Costa  Rica. 

The  occurrences  of  T.  merrillorum  in  Arizona  represent  the  first  Nearctic 
records  of  the  genus.  Figure  1  shows  the  geographic  location  of  sample  locations. 
Specimens  reported  herein  are  deposited  in  the  collection  at  the  EcoAnalysts, 
Inc.  Macroinvertebrate  Laboratory  in  Moscow,  Idaho  (El),  and  the  Florida  State 
Collection  of  Arthropods  at  Florida  A&M  University  in  Tallahassee  (FAMU). 
Collection  data  and  specimen  disposition  are  as  follows: 

ARIZONA:  10  larvae,  Gila  County,  Tonto  Creek,  Lat.  34.28333,  Long. 
111.07086,  V-22-2001,  A.  Francis  (2  larvae  FAMU,  8  larvae  El);  One  larva, 
Greenlee  County,  Blue  River,  Lat.  33.24044,  Long.  109.1915,  VI- 19-2001,  P. 
Matson  (El). 


1  Received  on  February  13,  2003.  Accepted  on  March  13,  2004. 

2  EcoAnalysts,  Inc..  105  East  Second  Street,  Suite  tt\ ,  Moscow,  ID  83843.  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  eco@ecoanalysts.com. 

'461  Tiger  Hammock  Road.  Crawfordville,  FL  32327.  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


1 1 8  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


EcoAnalysts,  Inc.  also  encountered  several  larvae  and  one  pupa  with  a  pharate 
male  in  Arizona  in  2002.  Data  for  this  collection  is  unavailable  for  publication 
due  to  confidentiality  concerns  of  the  client.  The  pupa  and  two  larvae  are 
deposited  at  FAMU  with  a  coded  sample  location. 

Physical  habitat  and  water  quality  data  for  the  two  localities  are  presented  in 
Table  1. 

Table  1.  Water  quality  parameters  (grab  samples)  at  T.  merrillorum  locations. 
These  are  one-time  grab  samples  collected  at  the  same  time  as  the  benthic  inver- 
tebrate sample  at  each  site.  No  means  or  variation  are  associated  with  the  values. 


Chemical  Variable  (mg/1) 

Tonto  Creek 

Blue  River 

PH 

8.65 

9.12 

Conductivity 

296.8 

426.8 

Alkalinity 

2909.27 

3054.62 

Turbidity 

11.3 

0.298 

Total  Suspended  Solids 

38.7 

2.2 

Dissolved  Organic  Carbon 

1.86 

1.99 

Dissolved  Inorganic  Carbon 

35.84 

35.54 

Total  Phosphorus 

55 

40 

Calcium 

41.715 

39.328 

Magnesium 

11.081 

12.947 

Sodium 

2.831 

31.394 

Potassium 

0.79 

2.335 

NH4 

0.016 

0.005 

S04 

13.38 

17.82 

NO3 

0.02 

0 

Chlorine 

2.94 

36.86 

Total  Nitrogen 

2.94 

36.86 

Zinc 

0.006 

0.005 

Silicon  Dioxide 

7.701 

34.06 

DISCUSSION 

Epler  and  de  la  Rosa  (1995)  discuss  taxonomic  similarities  and  differences 
among  Thienemanniella,  Corynoneura,  and  Tempisquitoneura  larvae  and  pupae 
in  detail.  Whole  (unmounted)  Tempisquitoneura  larvae  are  generally  similar  in 
appearance  to  the  closely  related  Thienemanniella  and  the  genus  is  usually  found 
attached  to  its  corydalid  host.  Consequently,  to  date  they  may  have  been  simply 
overlooked  in  benthic  samples  or  misidentified  as  Thienemanniella  sp.  The  pupa 


Vol.  114.  No.  2,  March  &  April  2003 


119 


Figure  1 .  Locations  of  Tempisquitoneura  merrillorum  Epler  in  Arizona,  southwestern 
U.S.A.  site  WAZP99-0632  is  located  in  Tonto  Creek  whereas  site  WAZP99-0681  is  locat- 
ed in  the  Blue  River. 


of  Tempisquitoneura  is  probably  separable  from  the  other  two  genera  by  the 
incomplete  setal  fringe  of  the  anal  lobes,  which  is  restricted  to  the  apical  half 
(Epler  and  de  la  Rosa  1995,  Figure  3D),  in  addition  to  other  characters  listed  in 
the  original  description. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Phil  Larsen,  Dave  Peck  and  Barb  Rosenbaum  (USEPA)  for  permis- 
sion to  publish  data  and  for  habitat  and  water  quality  data  collected  at  the  site. 
This  paper  is  published  as  EcoAnalysts,  Inc.  Publication  No.  2004-1 . 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Barbour,  M.  T.,  J.  Gerritsen,  B.  D.  Snyder,  and  J.  B.  Stribling.  1999.  Rapid  Bioassessment 
Protocols  for  Use  in  Streams  and  Wadeable  Rivers:  Periphyton,  Benthic  Macroinvertebrates  and 
Fish,  Second  Edition.  EPA  841-B-99-02.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency:  Office  of 
Water;  Washington,  D.C. 

Epler,  J.  H.  and  C.  de  la  Rosa.  1995.  Tcinpi.\(/iiiti>ni'nni.  a  new  genus  of  Neotropical  Orthocla- 
diinae  (Diptera:  Chironomidae)  symphoretic  on  L'orydalus  (Megaloptera:  Corydalidae).  Journal 
of  the  North  American  Benthological  Society  14(1):5()-60. 


1 20  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

NATURAL  ENEMIES.  AN  INTRODUCTION  TO  BIOLOGICAL  CONTROL. 
Ann  Hajek.  2004.  Cambridge  University  Press,  Cambridge,  CB2  2RU  United 
Kingdom.  Hardback,  US$110.00  (ISBN  0  521  65295  2).  Paperback,  US  $50.00 
(ISBN  0521  65385  1). 

Natural  Enemies  is  intended  as  a  college  textbook  for  those  who  are  at  an  intermediate  level  of  readi- 
ness (e.g.  at  least  one  college  biology  course)  to  learn  about  biological  control.  The  book  is  arranged  in 
a  traditional,  rational,  and  well-organized  fashion.  Hajek  introduces  the  subject  and  its  current  histori- 
cal backdrop  (Chapters  1-2)  and  then  provides  useful  discussions  of  three  non-mutually  exclusive  strate- 
gies of  biological  control:  classical,  augmentative  (inoculative  and  inundative),  as  well  as  conservation 
(Chapters  3-5).  Throughout  the  book,  she  emphasizes  the  need  for  sound  knowledge  of  the  systems,  a 
goal  seldom  achievable,  so  that  rational  integrated  pest  management  decisions  can  be  taken.  Thereafter, 
Hajek  includes  excellent  chapters  on  biological  control  of  pestiferous  animals  (Chapters  6-12),  weeds 
(Chapters  13-15),  and  plant  pathogens  (Chapters  16-17).  The  book  concludes  with  very  timely  discus- 
sions on  safety  (Chapter  18),  and  present  uses  of  biological  control  (Chapter  19).  Most  illustrations  are 
excellent;  some  of  them  are  gorgeous  scanning  electron  micrographs.  Natural  Enemies  closes  with  a 
useful  glossary,  a  substantial  list  of  references,  and  an  index. 

Hajek  highlights  numerous  important  topics,  such  as:  1)  dire  need  for  sound  taxonomic  work, 
including  characterizing  the  ecology  and  genetics  of  target  organisms  and  the  natural  enemies  using 
diverse  approaches,  2)  whether  a  "balance  of  nature"  is  ever  attained  in  biological  control,  3)  biologi- 
cal control  strategies  depend  on  the  targeted  pest,  4)  difficulties  rearing  numerous  organisms  involved 
in  biological  control,  5)  factors  that  increase  the  probability  of  survival  of  natural  enemies,  6)  impor- 
tance of  market  considerations,  7)  situations  where  biological  control  may  not  necessarily  be  the  best 
way  to  proceed,  8)  public  perception  of  the  field  as  environmentally  friendly  (in  contrast  with  genetic 
engineering  perceived  by  some  as  not  so  environmentally  friendly),  and  many  others.  While  none  of 
these  themes  are  new  to  biological  control,  she  often  brings  fresher  examples  from  a  wide  array  of  tax- 
onomic groups  as  well  as  strong  ecological  insights  to  support  her  assertions. 

Natural  Enemies  is  a  good  summary  of  the  intersection  between  entomology,  plant  pathology,  micro- 
biology, ecology,  host-pest-environment  interactions,  and  others,  as  they  apply  to  the  biological  control 
of  insect  pests,  weeds,  and  pathogens.  The  book  contains  knowledge  useful  in  the  development  of  bio- 
logical control  practices  that  are  compatible  with  integrative  pest  management.  In  spite  of  Natural 
Enemies'  emphasis  on  cases  of  biological  control  in  the  Holarctic  region,  particularly  the  U.S.A.,  the 
book  offers  a  fair  balance  of  topics  and  serves  as  an  excellent  introduction  to  the  subject.  My  personal 
preference  would  have  been  to:  1)  incorporate  the  citations  in  the  text,  although  I  acknowledge  some 
readers  find  that  practice  distracting,  2)  add  chapters  on  the  identification  of  organisms  (e.g.  plants  to  the 
level  of  division,  insects  to  the  ordinal  level)  with  major  references  to  lower  taxonomic  levels  and/or  for 
different  geographical  regions,  experimental  design,  and  statistical  analyses,  and  3)  include  more  cases 
involving  point/counterpoint  arguments,  such  as  issues  involving  conflict  of  interests/values.  Finally, 
end  of  chapter  questions  and/or  activities,  a  practice  common  in  introductory  biology/ecology  textbooks, 
would  have  made  this  text  more  viable  for  classroom  use. 

Biological  control  is  a  complex  scientific  endeavor  and  at  times  "many  decisions  ...  seem  more  like 
art  than  science."  Natural  Enemies  stresses  the  complexities  of  the  natural  world,  repeatedly  warns  us 
about  the  meticulousness  that  must  be  exercised  in  their  study  and  safe  practice,  and  still  manages  to 
keep  the  subject  attractive  and  readable. 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay,  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 

National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  Smithsonian  Institution 

P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  Book  Reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review  within  30  days.  The  Editor  reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manu- 
script to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcomed  to  list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  arti- 
cle should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  Editors  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  Editor  and  the  Business  Manager,  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  file,  together  with  the  reprint 
order  form  as  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  within  72  hours  and  return  them  to  the  Editor  and 
to  the  Business  Editor  by  air  mail  or  email  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are 
urged  to  provide  forwarding  orders  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not 
approved  within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  Editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send 
them  to  the  printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  $25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  $30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  half-tones  at  the  rate  of  $30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  These 
charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004  United 
States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts.  There 
are  no  page  charges  for  Book  Reviews.  Page  and  reprints  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to 
whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is: 
3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  Email:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  13-16  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  They  will  be 
billed  in  advance  together  with  page  charges.  The  following  rates,  all  in  US  dollars,  apply. 

Reprints:  100  200  300  400  500 
Pages 

1  44  48  50  52  54 

2  46  50  52  54  56 

3  48  52  54  56  58 

4  50  54  56  58  60 

5  76  86  96  106  116 

6  78  88  98  108  118 

7  80  90  100  110  120 

8  82  92  102  112  122 
9-12  120  130  145  160  180 
13-16  160  170  185  200  220 

Starting  with  Volume  114(3)  Entomological  News  reprints  as  a  .pdf  (portable  document 
format)  will  be  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  Business 
Manager,  Faith  Kuehn  (fbkuehn@yahoo.com). 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-1211:  fax  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132.  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DHNRIiC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48106-9866,  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  (.'innion  linlc\  E\i>anilcil. 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  OCTOBER  23,  2002 

letics  of  Parnassius  butterflies 
•rthern  Rockies,  Canada 

Nusha  Keyghobadi 


39088010579704 


The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 
(now  at  Okanagan  University  College,  British  Columbia,  Canada) 

Habitat  fragmentation  is  currently  considered  one  of  the  most  serious  problems  for 
nature  conservation.  From  a  genetic  perspective,  the  increased  isolation  of  populations 
that  results  from  habitat  fragmentation  is  predicted  to  have  two  major  effects  on  genetic 
variation,  with  genetic  differentiation  among  populations  predicted  to  increase  and  genet- 
ic diversity  within  populations  predicted  to  decrease.  Dr.  Nusha  Keyghobadi  examined  the 
genetic  consequences  of  habitat  fragmentation  on  populations  of  the  alpine  butterfly  Par- 
nassius  smintheus.  This  butterfly  tends  to  occupy  alpine  meadows  above  tree  line  where 
its  hostplant,  Sedum  lanceolatum,  occurs.  In  the  last  century,  increasing  tree  cover  and  the 
increase  in  elevation  of  the  tree  line  has  been  observed  in  North  America  and  is  attributed 
to  climate  change  and  forest  management  practices.  Increasing  forest  cover  at  high  alti- 
tudes leads  to  fragmentation  of  the  meadow  habitats  favored  by  this  butterfly. 

Dr.  Keyghobadi  examined  whether  (1)  the  amount  of  genetic  differentiation  among 
populations  and  (2)  levels  of  genetic  diversity  within  populations,  were  affected  by  the 
degree  of  isolation  of  these  populations,  particularly  by  intervening  forests.  Her  study  was 
conducted  in  a  series  of  alpine  meadows  distributed  along  ridges  in  the  front  ranges  of  the 
Canadian  Rocky  Mountains.  Genetic  variation  was  assessed  using  microsatellite  DNA 
loci.  The  degree  of  genetic  differentiation  among  pairs  of  populations  was  significantly 
correlated  with  the  geographic  distance  separating  those  populations.  Furthermore,  the 
amount  of  forested  habitat  separating  populations  was  a  better  predictor  of  genetic  differ- 
entiation than  was  the  amount  of  meadow  habitat,  suggesting  that  forested  areas  are  sig- 
nificant barriers  to  genetic  exchange  among  populations.  Also,  levels  of  genetic  diversity 
were  significantly  lower  in  more  isolated  populations.  Overall,  Dr.  Keyghobadi 's  results 
suggest  that  further  fragmentation  of  meadow  habitats  will  have  significant  impacts  on 
genetic  variation  in  this  species. 

In  other  entomological  notes.  Jack  Gingrich  noted  the  appearance  of  Ochleratatus  (= 
Aedes)  japonicus,  an  introduced  species,  at  four  sites  in  Delaware.  Jon  Gelhaus  noted  the 
re-discovery  of  the  crane  fly  Leptotarsus  rivertonensis  in  New  Jersey  after  nearly  a  cen- 
tury; it  had  been  described  from  specimens  collected  in  Riverton,  New  Jersey,  in  1903, 
and  was  found  in  2002  at  a  scout  camp  in  Salem  County,  New  Jersey.  Hal  White  noted 
that  the  niece  of  Philip  Calvert  contacted  the  Society  through  seeing  the  Society's  web- 
page  on  the  Calvert  Award.  Philip  Calvert  (1871-1961)  was  a  noted  worldwide  authority 
of  Odonata,  and  long-term  member  of  the  Society,  including  serving  23  years  as  editor  of 
Entomological  News. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  President  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (1997-2003) 
Corresponding  Secretary  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2003-present) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org. 

Mailed  on  June  23,  2004 


Vol.  114 


MAY  &  JUNE  2003 


USISSN  0013-872X 
No.  3 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


_     j  -:"    ee  new  species  and  one  new  subspecies  of  Colpurini  (Heteroptera:  Coreidae) 

"j  \*J    '     om  the  Pacific  Islands 

Harry  Brailovsky  and  Ernesto  Barrera    121 


A  new  species  of  bushcricket  (Orthoptera:  Tettigoniidae)  of  the  Palaearctic 
genus  Isophya  (Phaneropterinae)  from  Turkey 

Hasan  Sevgili    129 

Biological  notes  on  Mexican  (Coleoptera:  Lucanidae)  Lucanus  (Pseudolucanus) 
mazama  LeConte 

Pedro  Reyes-Castillo,  Imelda  Martinez  M.,  and  Maria  Luisa  Castillo    138 

Immature  stages  of  Sinopla  perpunctatus  (Heteroptera:  Acanthosomatidae) 
from  Argentina 

P.  Martinez,  P.  M.  Dellape,  M.  del  C.  Coscaron,  and  H.  Giganti    147 

Gynandromorphism  in  pollinating  fig  wasps  (Hymenoptera:  Agaonidae) 

from  Brazil 

R.  A.  S.  Pereira,  A.  P.  Prado,  and  F.  Kjellberg    152 

A  new  species  of  Atrichopogon  Kieffer  from  northern  Argentina  (Diptera: 

Ceratopogonidae)  Pablo  I.  Marino  and  Gustavo  R.  Spinelli    156 

Confirmation  of  Prostoia  completa  and  Shipsa  rotunda  (Plecoptera:  Nemouridae) 
in  Mississippi,  U.S.A.  Bill  R  Stark  and  Matthew  B.  Hicks    160 

Five  new  species  of  Neotrichia  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae:  Neotrichiini)  from 
southern  Mexico  and  northern  Belize  Andrew  C.  Keth    164 


BOOK  REVIEWS: 

Insects  of  the  Texas  Lost  Pines  by  W.  L.  Moody  Jr. 

A  Joyful  Noise,  Poems  for  Two  Voices  by  Paul  Fleischman 


Phil  Schappert    179 
Bethany  Sadlowski  and  Julia  Louie    180 


Cicada  -  Why  Have  You  Stayed  Away  So  Long 


Benjamin  C.  Garber 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  JULY  28,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1.0 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomologi- 
cal Society  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway.  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195.  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  email  aes@acnatsci.org;  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  Members  of  the  Society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the 
USA  and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues,  when  available, 
are  sold  by  complete  volume  for  US  $15  to  Members  and  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  or  email  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  Editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890- 
1920  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-1961);  1945-1967  R.G. 
Schmieder  (1898-1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974- 
2002  Howard  P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News:  Version  1.0. 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.coni/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology.  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author  although  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all 
prospective  authors  join  the  society. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  Editor:  Address. 

All  manuscripts,  including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomol- 
ogical News  as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A. 
Santiago-Blay  at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012 
U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.O.  Box,  please  use 
this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other 
means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  phone  (202)  786-2876,  Fax  (202)  786-2832,  web  page 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.htm,  e-mails  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu  or 
blayj@hotmail.com.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  Editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them 
to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  original 
artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  type  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for 
the  Acknowledgments  and  the  Literature  Cited. 

Postmaster:   If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 121 

THREE  NEW  SPECIES  AND  ONE  NEW  SUBSPECIES  OF 
COLPURINI  (HETEROPTERA:  COREIDAE)  FROM 

PACIFIC  ISLANDS' 

Harry  Brailovsky2  and  Ernesto  Bar 

ABSTRACT:  Three  new  species  Kerzhnerhygia  mibila  from  Iri^Jaya  (Dutch 
Sciophyrella  cerama  from  Ceram  Island,  Sciophyrella  submacmptera  frhm-P:iprp  ^fc£*eirt™  and 
one  new  subspecies  Brachylybas  novoguinensisfurcatus  from  Irian  Jaya,  are  described.  Adult  dorsal 
habitus  of  some  species  are  illustrated,  and  drawings  of  pronotum,  male  genital  capsule,  and  female 
genital  plates  are  included.  -**«**"" 

KEY  WORDS:  Heteroptera,  Coreidae,  Colpurini,  new  species,  Pacific  Islands. 

The  Colpurini  fauna  of  the  Pacific  Islands  is  poorly  known  due  to  its  complex 
geography  and  the  lack  of  intensive  appropriate  field  research.  What  is  present- 
ly known,  nevertheless,  indicates  such  a  fauna  as  being  outstanding  in  richness 
and  interesting,  with  an  unusually  high  rate  of  endemic  elements  (Brailovsky 
2000,  Brailovsky  and  Barrera  2003). 

The  paper  is  a  further  contribution  to  the  knowledge  of  this  tribe  and  provides 
the  descriptions  of  three  new  species  and  one  new  subspecies. 

Brachylybas  novoguinensisfurcatus,  NEW  SUBSPECIES 

(Figs.  2-3,  16) 

Description.-Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head  black,  with  postocular  tubercle  yellow 
and  apex  of  tylus  bright  chestnut  orange;  antennal  segments  I  to  III  bright  chestnut  orange,  IV  seg- 
ment yellow  with  basal  third  bright  chestnut  orange;  pronotum  with  anterior  and  anterolateral  mar- 
gins dark  yellow;  anterior  lobe  of  pronotal  disk  dark  brown  with  medial  longitudinal  furrow  between 
calli  black;  posterior  lobe  of  pronotal  disk  dark  yellow  with  punctures  reddish  brown;  clavus  and 
corium  reddish  brown  with  claval  vein,  claval  comissure,  corial  veins,  apical  margin,  and  costal  mar- 
gin dark  yellow;  hemelytral  membrane  dark  brown  to  black  with  veins  dark  yellow;  connexival  seg- 
ments reddish  brown  with  anterior  and  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  dark  to 
bright  brownish  orange.  Ventral  coloration.  Head  black;  rostral  segments  dark  yellow;  thorax  and 
abdominal  sterna  dark  yellow  with  punctures  reddish  brown;  prosternum,  mesostemum,  metaster- 
num,  coxae,  fore  and  middle  femora,  tarsi,  and  genital  capsule  bright  chestnut  orange;  trochanters 
yellow;  hind  femur  and  tibiae  chestnut  orange  with  one  or  two  irregular  yellow  rings,  one  subbasal, 
and  one  near  middle  third.  Structure.  Rostrum  reaching  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  V;  humer- 
al angles  subtruncate,  not  exposed  (Fig.  2).  Genital  capsule:  Posteroventral  edge  with  long,  broad, 
bifid  tube,  directed  outward  and  upward;  each  arm  relatively  elongate  (Fig.  3). 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Connexival  segments  VIII  and  IX,  dorsal  abdom- 
inal segments  VIII  and  IX,  and  genital  plates  reddish  brown. 

Measurements.  Male  (female).  Head  length:  1.60  mm  (1.5S  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1.76  mm 
(1.72  mm);  interocular  space:  1.16  mm  (1.04  mm);  antennal  segments  lengths:  I,  1.80  mm  (1.76  mm); 
II,  2.80  mm  (2.84  mm);  III,  2.08  mm  (2.04  mm);  IV,  1.40  mm  (1.36  mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.96  mm 


'  Received  on  July  4,  2003.  Accepted  on  January  6,  2004. 

:  Dcpartamento  de  Zoologia,  Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Apartado  Postal  No.  70153,  Mexico 
04510  D.F.  Mexico.  Email:  coreidae(o>servidor.unam.in\. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  114(3):  121.  May  &  June  2003 
Mailed  on  Julv  28,  2004 


122 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


(2.04  mm);  maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  2.12  mm  (2.12  mm);  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe: 
3.08  mm  (3.08  mm):  Scutellar  length:  1.32  mm  (1.32  mm);  width:  1.38  mm  (1.34  mm).  Total  body 
length:  9.08  mm  (9. 16  mm). 

Type  Material.  Holotype:  male,  Irian  Jaya  (Dutch  New  Guinea),  Jayawijaya  Province,  Ang- 
guruk-Tanggeam,  1500-1800  m,  28-29-IX-1991,  A.  Riedel.  Deposited  in  Zoologische  Staatssamm- 
lung,  Munchen,  Germany.  Paratypes:  2  males,  2  females,  same  data  as  holotype.  Deposited  in 
Zoologische  Staatssammlung,  Munchen,  Germany,  and  Coleccion  Nacional  de  Insectos  (CN1N), 
Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Mexico;  1  male,  Irian  Jaya,  Lordberg,  ll-XII-1912,  S.  G.  Burgers 
(Kais  Augustafl  Exp.).  Deposited  in  Zoologisches  Museum,  Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin,  Germany. 

Discussion.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  furcatus  new  subespecies,  occurs  in 
Irian  Jaya  and  stands  close  to  the  nominal  species  B.  novoguinensis  novoguinen- 
sis Brailovsky  &  Martinez  (1994)  described  from  Papua  New  Guinea.  In  B.  n. 
furcatus  the  humeral  angles  are  subtruncate  and  not  exposed  (Fig.  2),  the  rostrum 
reaches  the  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  V,  and  the  posteroventral  edge  of 
the  male  genital  capsule  has  a  long,  broad,  and  bifid  tube,  each  arm  being  rela- 
tively elongate  (Fig.  3).  In  B.  n.  novoguinensis  the  humeral  angles  are  laminate, 
exposed,  and  subacute  (Fig.  1),  the  rostrum  reaches  the  anterior  third  of  abdom- 
inal sternite  V,  and  the  tube  of  the  male  genital  capsule  has  the  arms  shorter  (Figs 
4-5). 

Etymology.-From  the  Latin  furcatus,  for  forked,  referring  to  the  branched 
genital  capsule. 


Figures  1-2.  Pronotum.  1.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  novoguinensis  Brailovsky  and 
Martinez.  2.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  furcatus  NEW  SUBSPECIES.  Figures  3-5.  Male 
genital  capsule,  caudal  view  (3-4),  lateral  view  (5).  3.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  furca- 
tus NEW  SUBSPECIES.  4-5.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  novoguinensis  Brailovsky  and 
Martinez.  Figures  6-7.  Kerzhnerhygia  nubila  NEW  SPECIES.  6.  Head  and  pronotum. 
7.  Male  genital  capsule,  caudal  view. 


Vol.  114,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


123 


12 


Figures  8-15.  Sciophyrella  spp.  8-13.  Male  genital  capsule,  caudal  view  (8-9,  11-12),  lat- 
eral view  (10,  13).  8.  S.  submacroptera  NEW  SPECIES.  9-10.  S.  cerama  NEW  SPECIES. 
11.5.  parva  Brailovsky  and  Barrera.  12-13.  S.  morobe  Brailovsky  and  Barrera.  14-15. 
Female  genital  plates,  lateral  view.  14.  S.  morobe  Brailovsky  and  Barrera.  15.  S.  cerama 
NEW  SPECIES. 


Kenhnerhygia  nubila,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  6-7) 

Description.  Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Chestnut  orange  brown,  with  antennal  seg- 
ment IV  (except  the  basal  joint),  anterolateral  margins  of  pronotal  disc,  and  apex  ofscutellum  pale 
yellow;  hemelytral  membrane  pale  brown  with  veins  darker;  connexival  segments  bright  reddish 
orange  with  posterior  margin  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  bright  orange.  Ventral  coloration. 
Head  bright  reddish  brown;  rostral  segments  I  and  II  dark  yellow  with  chestnut  brown  reflections, 
and  III  and  IV  dark  yellow;  thorax  bright  reddish  brown  with  acetabulae,  upper  margin  of  propleura, 
and  irregular  marks  on  mesopleura  and  metapleura  yellow;  coxae  chestnut  orange;  trochanters  and 
tarsi  chestnut  orange  with  yellow  reflections;  femora  and  tibiae  chestnut  orange  with  two  yellow 
rings,  one  subbasal,  the  other  near  middle  third;  abdominal  sterna  and  genital  capsule  pale  chestnut 
orange  with  punctures  darker;  anterior  lobe  of  metathoracic  peritreme  creamy  yellow  to  pale  chest- 
nut orange,  and  posterior  lobe  pale  chestnut  orange;  pleural  abdominal  segments  orange  with  poste- 
rior margin  yellow.  Structure.  Head  longer  than  width  across  eyes;  antenniferous  tubercle  armed, 
strongly  projecting  forward  and  inward,  with  the  apex  acutely  rounded;  antennal  segment  II  the 
longest,  III  and  IV  subequal,  and  I  longer  than  III  and  IV;  buccula  with  weakly  middle  projection; 
rostrum  reaching  anterior  margin  of  abdominal  sternite  VII;  calli  prominently  raised,  separated  along 
midline  by  short  longitudinal  furrow;  legs  unarmed  (Fig.  6).  Genital  capsule:  Posteroventral  edge  U- 
shaped,  with  lateral  arms  broad,  strongly  produced  (Fig.  7). 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Connexival  segments  VIII  and  IX,  dorsal  abdom- 
inal segments  VIII  and  IX,  and  genital  plates  bright  orange  with  outer  margin  of  paratergite  VIII  and 
IX  yellow. 

Measurements.-Male  (female).  Head  length:  1.74  mm  (1.62  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1.40  mm 
(1.40  mm);  interocular  space:  0.90  mm  (0.88  mm);  interocellar  space:  0.42  mm  (0.44  mm);  preocu- 


124 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


2mm 


16 


Figure  16.  Brachylybas  novoguinensis  furcatm  NEW  SUBSPECIES,  dorsal  view.  Male. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 125 


lar  distance:  1.18  mm  (1.18  mm);  antennal  segments  lengths:  I,  1.48  mm  (1.48  mm);  II,  2.64  mm 
(2.44  mm);  III,  1.18  mm  (1.22  mm);  IV,  1.18  mm  (1.22  mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.84  mm  (1.80  mm); 
maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.92  mm  (1.86  mm);  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe:  3.16  mm 
(3.32  mm):  Scutellar  length:  1 .56  mm  ( 1 .60  mm);  width:  1 .48  mm  ( 1 .52  mm).  Total  body  length:  9.80 
mm  (9.58  mm). 

Type  material.-Holotype:  male,  Dutch  New  Guinea,  ger  29  km  unterh  d.  Maanderberges  a. 
Sepik,  1 1-16-VII-1913,  S.  G.  Burgers  (Kais  Augustafl  Exp.).  Deposited  in  Zoologisches  Museum, 
Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin,  Germany.  Paratypes:  1  male,  1  female,  same  data  as  male  holorype. 
Deposited  in  Zoologisches  Museum,  Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin,  Germany,  and  Coleccion 
Nacional  de  Insectos  (CNIN),  Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Mexico;  1  female,  Dutch  New  Guinea, 
Maanderberg,  10-16-VIII-1913,  S.  G.  Burgers  (Kais  Augustafl  Exp.).  Deposited  in  Zoologisches 
Museum,  Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin,  Germany. 

Discussion.-Brailovsky  (1993)  described  the  genus  Kerzhnerhygia  and  in- 
cluded two  species  K.  armata  and  K.  robusta.  Kerzhnerhygia  nubila,  new 
species,  is  similar  to  K.  robusta  in  having  the  femora  unarmed,  and  is  easily  rec- 
ognized by  the  head  longer  than  wide  (across  the  eyes),  antennal  segments  III 
and  IV  subequal,  and  rostrum  reaching  anterior  margin  of  abdominal  sternite  VII. 
In  K.  robusta  the  head  is  wider  than  long,  antennal  segment  IV  is  shorter  than  III, 
and  rostrum  reaching  anterior  third  of  abdominal  sternite  III.  In  K.  armata  each 
femur  are  armed  with  two  rows  of  long  spines,  the  rostrum  reaching  the  anterior 
third  of  abdominal  sternite  V  or  VI,  the  head  is  as  long  as  wide,  with  antennal 
segment  IV  shorter  than  III,  and  the  projection  of  the  antenniferous  tubercle 
clearly  diverging  anteriorly,  not  converging  like  in  K.  nubila. 

Etymology.  From  the  Latin  nubilus,  referring  to  the  relatively  undistinguished 
nature  of  the  species. 

Sciophyrella  cerama,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  9-10,  15) 

Description.-Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head  bright  dark  orange  brown,  with  pale  yel- 
low longitudinal  band  running  from  antenniferous  tubercle  to  neck,  comprising  the  space  between 
eye  and  ocelli,  and  dorsal  view  of  postocular  tubercle;  tylus  pale  bright  chestnut  orange;  antennal  seg- 
ments I  to  III  ochre  yellow  (IV  mutilated);  anterior  lobe  of  pronotal  disk  bright  dark  orange  brown 
with  ochre  yellow  irregular  mark  at  collar  and  calli;  posterior  lobe  of  pronotal  disk  bright  pale  chest- 
nut orange  with  punctures  reddish  brown,  external  edge  of  humeral  angles  and  irregular  stripe  at  mid- 
dle third  yellow;  scutellum,  clavus,  and  corium  pale  chestnut  orange  with  punctures  reddish  brown; 
hemelytral  membrane  ambarine  with  veins  dark  brown;  connexivum  dark  orange  with  posterior  bor- 
der yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  dark  orange.  Ventral  coloration.  Head  bright  dark  orange 
brown  with  the  area  close  to  eyes  yellow;  rostral  segments  yellow  with  dark  orange  reflections;  tho- 
rax ochre  yellow  with  punctures  reddish  brown;  anterior  lobe  of  metathoracic  peritreme  creamy  yel- 
low, and  posterior  lobe  dark  orange;  coxae  dark  orange  brown;  trochanters  dark  yellow;  femora 
chestnut  orange;  tibiae  chestnut  orange  with  two  yellow  rings,  one  subbasal,  the  other  near  middle 
third;  tarsi  chestnut  orange  with  yellow  reflections;  abdominal  sterna  and  genital  capsule  ochre  yel- 
low with  punctures  reddish  brown;  pleural  margin  of  abdominal  sterna  bright  orange  with  posterior 
border  yellow.  Structure.  Head  longer  than  wide  across  the  eyes,  or  as  long  as  wide;  tylus  unarmed, 
apically  globose  or  weakly  bifid;  antenniferous  tubercle  unarmed;  genae  with  obtuse,  nearly  indis- 
tinct teeth;  postocular  tubercle  protuberant,  globose;  ocelli  weakly  raised;  rostrum  reaching  posteri- 
or border  of  abdominal  sternite  IV  or  anterior  margin  of  V;  pronotum  bilobed;  frontal  and  humeral 
angles  rounded,  not  exposed;  calli  slightly  convex;  fore  femur  ventrally  armed  with  small  denticles; 
middle  and  hind  femora  unarmed  or  with  few  denticles;  tibiae  sulcated;  scutellum  longer  than  wide; 
hemelytra  macropterous,  reaching  the  apex  of  last  abdominal  segments;  apical  margin  of  cndocori- 


126  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


urn  impunctate.  Genital  capsule:  Posteroventral  edge  with  deep  U-shaped  notch,  enclosed  by  two 
conspicuously  robust  and  elongate  arms;  space  between  arms  wider  than  0.45  mm  (Figs.  9-10). 

Female.-Coloration.  Similar  to  male  (holotype).  Connexival  segments  VIII  and  IX  dark  orange 
with  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX  dark  orange;  genital  plates 
ochre  yellow  with  punctures  reddish  brown.  Structure.  Genitalia:  Gonocoxae  I  enlarged  dorsoven- 
trally,  in  caudal  view  closed,  in  lateral  view  uniformly  convex,  not  protruding,  ventrally  projected  in 
a  short  and  blunt  lobe  (Fig.  15). 

Measurements.-Male  (female).  Head  length:  1.68  mm  (1.76  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1.64  mm 
(1.76  mm);  interocular  space:  0.92  mm  (0.96  mm);  interocellar  space:  0.46  mm  (0.48  mm);  preocu- 
lar  distance:  1.02  mm  (1.08  mm);  antennal  segments  lengths:  I,  1.82  mm  (1.82  mm);  II,  2.62  mm 
(2.64  mm);  III,  1.84  mm  (1.87  mm);  IV,  mutilated.  Pronotal  length:  2.30  mm  (2.44  mm);  maximum 
width  of  anterior  lobe:  2.04  mm  (2.32  mm);  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe:  3.56  mm  (4.00  mm): 
Scutellar  length:  1.88  mm  (2.04  mm);  width:  1.64  mm  (1.88  mm).  Total  body  length:  10.70  mm 
(11.76mm). 

Type  material.-Holotype:  male,  Ceram  Island,  1913,  E.  Stresemann.  Deposited  in  The  Natural 
History  Museum,  London.  Paratypes:  3  males,  2  females,  same  data  as  male  holotype.  Deposited  in 
The  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  and  Coleccion  Nacional  de  Insectos  (CNIN),  Institute  de 
Biologia,  UNAM,  Mexico. 

Discussion.-Close  to  S.  morobe  Brailovsky  &  Barrera  (1996)  described  from 
Papua  New  Guinea  and  Dutch  New  Guinea,  with  scutellum  clearly  longer  than 
wide,  antennal  segment  III  longer  than  I,  frontal  angles  rounded  and  not  exposed, 
tylus  apically  globose  to  weakly  bifid,  postocular  tubercle  protuberant,  antennif- 
erous  tubercle  unarmed,  and  apical  margin  of  endocorium  impunctate.  Both 
species  are  distinguished  by  the  shape  of  the  male  and  female  genitalia.  In  S. 
cerama,  recorded  from  the  Island  of  Ceram,  the  lateral  arms  of  the  male  genital 
capsule  are  remarkably  broad  and  elongate  (Fig.  9-10),  the  gonocoxae  I  are 
enlarged  dorsoventrally  and  in  lateral  view  uniformly  convex  (Fig.  15).  In  S. 
morobe  the  lateral  arms  are  elongate  and  relatively  broad  (Figs.  12-13),  and  the 
gonocoxae  I  with  upper  third  almost  straight,  and  inner  third  directed  outward, 
and  conspicuously  protuberant  (Fig.  14). 

Etymology.-The  name  is  derived  from  the  type  locality. 

Sdophyrella  submacroptera,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  8) 

Description.-Male  (holotype).  Dorsal  coloration.  Head  pale  chestnut  orange  with  yellow  longi- 
tudinal band  running  from  antenniferous  tubercle  to  the  neck,  comprising  the  space  between  eye  and 
ocelli,  and  dorsal  view  of  postocular  tubercle;  antennal  segments  I  to  III  ochre  yellow,  IV  ochre  yel- 
low with  basal  third  and  apex  dark  orange  brown;  pronotum,  including  the  punctures  pale  chestnut 
orange  with  lateral  margins  of  collar,  anterolateral  borders,  external  edge  of  humeral  angles,  and  an 
irregular  spotting  at  calli  and  at  middle  lobe  of  pronotal  disc  yellow;  clavus  and  corium  pale  chest- 
nut orange;  hemelytral  membrane  pale  ambarine,  with  veins  dark  brown;  connexivum  dark  orange 
brown  with  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  dark  orange.  Ventral  coloration. 
Including  the  genital  capsule  pale  chestnut  orange  on  an  ochre  yellow  background;  rostral  segments 
I,  III,  and  IV  ochre  yellow,  II  dark  orange  brown;  anterior  lobe  of  metathoracic  peritreme  creamy  yel- 
low, posterior  lobe  dark  yellow;  coxae  dark  chestnut  brown;  trochanters  ochre  yellow  with  outer  mar- 
gin dark  brown;  femora  and  tibiae  dark  chestnut  orange  with  two  yellow  rings  one  subbasal,  the  other 
near  middle  third  (rings  of  fore  femur  difficult  to  see);  tarsi  dark  chestnut  orange  with  yellow  reflec- 
tions. Structure.  Head  wider  than  long  or  as  long  as  wide;  tylus  unarmed,  apically  globose  or  weak- 
ly bifid;  antenniferous  tubercle  and  genae  unarmed;  postocular  tubercle  protuberant,  globose;  ocelli 
weakly  raised;  rostrum  reaching  middle  third  of  abdominal  sternite  IV;  pronotum  bilobed;  frontal 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 127 


angles  round  to  slightly  produced;  humeral  angles  rounded,  not  exposed;  calli  convex;  femora 
unarmed  or  ventrally  with  few  denticles;  tibiae  sulcate;  scutellum  longer  than  wide  or  as  long  as 
wide;  hemelytra  submacropterus,  reaching  posterior  border  of  abdominal  segment  VI  or  anterior  bor- 
der of  VII;  apical  margin  of  endocorium  impunctate.  Genital  capsule;  Posteroventral  edge  with  deep 
U-shaped  notch,  enclosed  by  two  short  and  stout  arms;  space  between  arms  shorter  than  0.40  mm 
(Fig.  8). 

Female.  Coloration.  Similar  to  male  holotype.  Connexival  segments  VIII  and  IX  dark  orange 
brown  with  posterior  border  yellow;  dorsal  abdominal  segments  VIII  and  IX  dark  orange;  genital 
plates  pale  chestnut  orange  on  an  ochre  yellow  background.  Structure.  Genitalia:  Gonocoxae  I 
enlarged  dorsoventrally,  in  caudal  view  closed,  in  lateral  view  uniformly  convex,  not  protruding,  and 
ventrally  projected  in  a  short  and  blunt  lobe. 

Measurements.  Male  (female).  Head  length:  1.52  mm  (1.48  mm);  width  across  eyes:  1.56  mm 
(1.48  mm);  interocular  space:  0.84  mm  (0.80  mm);  interocellar  space:  0.44  mm  (0.42  mm);  preocu- 
lar  distance:  0.92  mm  (0.94  mm);  antennal  segments  lengths:  I,  1.40  mm  (1.36  mm);  II,  1.96  mm 
(1.80  mm);  III,  1.36  mm  (1.24  mm);  IV,  1.36  mm  (1.24  mm).  Pronotal  length:  1.92  mm  (1.76  mm); 
maximum  width  of  anterior  lobe:  1.74  mm  (1.84  mm);  maximum  width  of  posterior  lobe:  2.76  mm 
(2.64  mm):  Scutellar  length:  1 .32  mm  ( 1 .40  mm);  width:  1 .32  mm  ( 1 .20  mm).  Total  body  length:  8.82 
mm  (9.18  mm). 

Type  material.  Holotype:  male,  Papua  New  Guinea,  Kokoda,  1200',  IV- 1933,  L.  E.  Cheesman. 
Deposited  in  The  Natural  History  Museum,  London.  Paratypes:  1  male,  1  female,  same  data  as  male 
holotype.  Deposited  in  The  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  and  Coleccion  Nacional  de  Insectos 
(CNIN),  Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM,  Mexico;  2  females,  Papua  New  Guinea,  Kokoda,  1200',  VI- 
1933,  L.  E.  Cheesman.  Deposited  in  The  Natural  History  Museum,  London. 

Discussion.  Sciophyrella  submacroptera  is  the  only  species  in  the  genus  with 
submacropterous  condition  on  the  hemelytra.  All  the  previously  known  species 
are  macropterous  (Brailovsky  &  Barrera  1996).  Like  S.  parva  Brailovsky  & 
Barrera  (1996)  the  space  between  the  arms  of  the  male  genital  capsule  is  less  than 
0.40  mm,  and  the  maximum  length  of  the  body  is  less  than  9.40  mm  in  both 
sexes.  In  S.  pan'a  the  posteroventral  edge  of  the  male  genital  capsule  has  a  small 
V-shaped  notch  with  lateral  arms  conspicuously  shorter  (Fig.  11).  In  S.  sub- 
macroptera, the  lateral  arms  of  the  male  genital  capsule  are  longer  with  the  notch 
deep  and  U-shaped  (Fig.  8).  The  female  genital  plates  of  both  species  are  simi- 
lar. 

Etymology.-Named  for  its  submacropterous  condition. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  the  following  colleagues  and  institutions  for  the  loan  of  specimens  and  other  assistance 
relevant  to  this  study:  Mick  Webb  (The  Natural  History  Museum,  London),  Juergen  Deckert  (Zoolo- 
gisches  Museum,  Humboldt  Universitat,  Berlin,  Germany),  and  Klaus  Schonitzer  (Zoologische 
Staatssammlung  Munchen,  Germany).  Special  thanks  to  Albino  Luna  for  the  dorsal  view  illustra- 
tions. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Brailovsky,  H.  1993.  New  genera  and  new  species  of  Colpurini  (Heteroptera:  Coreidae)  from  the 
Fiji  Islands  and  New  Guinea.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  95:435- 
448. 

Brailovsky,  H.  2000.  A  revision  of  the  Tribe  Colpurini  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera:  Coreinae)  from 
Sulawesi.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  126:  175-220 


128  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Brailovsky,  H.  &  J.  Martinez.  1994.  Revision  del  genero  Brachylybas  (Hemiptera-Heteroptera: 
Coreidae:  Colpurini).  Publicaciones  Especiales,  Institute  de  Biologia,  UNAM  13:1-82. 

Brailovsky,  H.  &  E.  Barrera.  1996.  Revision  del  complejo  Sciophyrus  (Hemiptera:  Coreidae: 
Colpurini).  Folia  Entomol.ogica  Mexicana  96:  15-106. 

Brailovsky,  H.  &  E.  Barrera.  2003.  A  new  genus  and  new  species  of  Colpurini  (Heteroptera: 
Coreidae)  from  New  Guinea.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  105:  362- 

372. 


CORRIGENDA 

On  a  recently  published  paper  [Kight  and  Hashemi,  Entomological  News 
114(2):  61-68],  several  Greek  characters  were  misprinted.  On  page  63, 
where  it  reads  "Data  were  analyzed...  with  a  =  0.05."  it  should  have  read 
"Data  were  analyzed...  with  a=  0.05."  On  pages  63  and  65,  several  sen- 
tences include  an  "X:  "  or  an  "X  2".  In  all  cases,  it  should  have  been  print- 
ed as  2- 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 129 

A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  BUSHCRICKET  (ORTHOPTERA: 
TETTIGONIIDAE)  OF  THE  PALAEARCTIC  GENUS 
ISOPHYA  (PHANEROPTERINAE)  FROM  TURKEY1 

Hasan  Sevgilr 

ABSTRACT:  The  new  bushcricket  species  Isophya  rizeensis  is  described  from  montane  forest  and 
subalpine  zones  of  Mt.  Kackar,  Turkey.  Its  relation  with  other  related  members  of  the  genus  is  dis- 
cussed on  the  basis  of  morphological  and  bioacoustical  traits.  Data  on  the  song  and  stridulatory 
organs  of  the  new  species  are  also  presented. 

Key  Words:  Orthoptera,  Tettigoniidae,  Phaneropterinae,  Isophya,  Turkey,  calling  song. 

The  genus  Isophya  Brunner  von  Wattenwyl  (Orthoptera,  Tettigoniidae)  is,  by 
far,  one  of  the  large  genus  of  the  subfamily  Phaneropterinae,  containing  about  90 
species  (Otte  et  al.,  2004).  Like  the  closely  related  largest  genus  Poecilimon 
Fischer,  Isophya  species  occur  mainly  in  Southeastern  Europe,  Anatolia  and  Cau- 
casica  (e.g.  Ramme,  1951;  Bei-Bienko,  1954;  Karabag,  1958;  Harz,  1969;  Heller 
et  al.,  1998),  many  of  them  having  very  restricted  ranges  within  this  area.  Turkey 
was  already  known  for  a  remarkably  high  number  of  Isophya  species  and  the 
majority  is  endemic  to  Anatolia  (Cyplak  et  al.,  2002;  Sevgili  and  Heller,  2003). 
All  are  short  winged,  usually  green  or  blackish  colored,  living  in  forests  (e.g.  /. 
redtenbacheri),  forest  edges  (e.g.  /.  paveli),  shrubby  (e.g.  /.  hakkaricd)  and  ma- 
quis  vegetation  (e.g.  /.  rodsjankoi}  or  steppe  vegetation  (e.g.  /.  nervosd)  from  sea 
level  to  above  the  timberline. 

The  differential  diagnosis  of  species  within  Isophya  is  based  on  small  differ- 
ences in  some  morphological  structures,  such  as  the  pronotum,  tegmina,  male 
cerci,  the  female  subgenital  plate,  ovipositor  and  some  morphometric  characters 
(e.g.  Ramme,  1951;  Bei-Bienko,  1954;  Karabag,  1962;  Sevgili  and  Heller,  2003). 
Therefore,  the  acoustic  signals  used  for  mate  finding  and  attracting  behavior  of 
males  and  females  can  be  very  useful  diagnostic  characters  as  songs  of  closely 
related  species  may  often  differ  in  one  or  more  parameters  (e.g.  Zhantiev  and 
Korsunovskaya,  1986;  Heller,  1988,  1990;  Ragge  and  Reynolds,  1998;  Stumpner 
and  Meyer,  2001;  Orci  et  a/.,  2001).  Documentation  of  the  acoustic  and  mating 
behaviors  of  the  numerous  Isophya  species  is  still  largely  incomplete.  Calling 
songs  of  Isophya  species  have  mostly  been  recorded  for  European  (Zhantiev  and 
Dubrovin,  1977;  Heller,  1988;  Ingrisch,  1991;  Orci  et  al.,  2001)  and  Anatolian 
species  (9  species)  (Heller,  1988,  1990).  In  this  paper,  we  describe  a  new  species, 
Isophya  rizeensis,  known  from  Camlyhemsin  (Rize  Prov.)  in  the  East  Black  Sea 
Region  (Dogu  Karadeniz  Bolgesi)  of  Turkey.  In  addition,  we  present  the  descrip- 
tion of  the  male  calling  song  of  the  new  species.  This  study  is  part  of  a  larger 
project  on  the  systematics  and  calling  songs  of  the  genus  Isophya  in  Turkey. 


'  Received  on  January  14,  2004;  Accepted  on  March  23,  2004. 

:  Hacettepe  University,  Faculty  of  Science,  Department  of  Biology,  06532,  Beytepe,  Ankara,  Turkey. 
E-mail:  hsevgilifa'haccttepe. edu.tr. 

Mailed  on  July  28.  2004 


130  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


METHODS 

Bush  crickets.  All  specimens  were  collected  from  the  East  Black  Sea  Region 
of  Turkey.  Some  were  preserved  in  alcohol,  but  living  specimens  were  examined 
for  coloration.  The  type  material,  including  holotype,  examined  in  this  study  are 
deposited  in  HUZOM  (Hacettepe  University,  Zoology  Museum,  Ankara,  Tur- 
key). Morphological  terminology  follows  Ramme  (1951),  Bei-Bienko  (1954), 
Harz  (1969)  and  Sevgili  and  Heller  (2003).  Figures  were  drawn  and  measure- 
ments were  taken  using  a  camera  lucida  attached  to  a  stereo  microscope.  Mea- 
surements were  defined  as  follows:  total  length,  the  distance  between  the  frons 
and  apex  of  abdomen  (excluding  ovipositor);  length  of  pronotum  (pronotal  disc), 
the  median  length  of  the  disc  from  anterior  to  posterior  margin;  length  of  tegmi- 
na,  the  distance  between  the  rear  margin  of  the  pronorum  to  tegmen  tip  as  viewed 
laterally;  length  of  hind  femur,  the  greatest  dimension  of  this  structure  as  seen  in 
lateral  view  (excluding  trochanter);  length  of  ovipositor,  the  distance  from  the 
apex  of  the  ovipositor  to  the  apex  of  the  subgenital  plate.  Measurements  are 
given  in  mm.  Stridulatory  files  were  studied  with  a  light  microscope  and  a  Scan- 
ning Electron  Microscope  (SEM).  For  electron  microscopy,  the  left  forewing  was 
removed  and  transferred  to  absolute  ethanol  for  at  least  1 8  hours,  cleaned  using 
an  ultrasonic  cleaner,  then  air-dried  and  mounted  on  a  microscope  stub. 

Song  nomenclature.  Calling  song,  song  produced  by  an  isolated  male.  Syl- 
lable, the  sound  produced  by  one  complete  up  (opening)  and  down  (closing) 
stroke  of  the  wing.  Impulse,  a  simple,  undivided,  transient  train  of  sound  waves. 
Syllable  period  (reciprocal  value:  syllable  repetition  rate),  time  period  from  the 
beginning  of  one  syllable  to  the  beginning  of  the  next. 

Calling  song.  The  male  calling  songs  were  recorded  in  the  laboratory  using  a 
Sony  WM-GX688  Walkman  and  a  stereo  microphone  (50  Hz  to  18000  Hz)  (dis- 
tance to  microphone  about  10  cm).  The  calling  songs  of  12  males  were  recorded 
at  temperatures  between  23°C  and  29°C.  The  males  and  females  were  kept 
acoustically  isolated  from  the  male  being  recorded.  After  digitising  the  songs  on 
a  PC,  oscillograms  (after  filtering)  and  its  analysis  were  made  using  a  PC  and  the 
programs  Spectra  Plus,  Turbolab  and  CoolEdit. 

SYSTEMATICS 

Tettigonioidea:  Tettigoniidae:  Phaneropterinae:  Barbitistini 
Isophya  Brunner  von  Wattenwyl,  1878 

hophya  rizeensis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-6,  8-20,  22) 

Type  locality.  TR.  Rize  Prov.-  Qamlyhemsin,  Meydan  koyii  alty,  40°54'  N  40°56'  E,  900  m,  23 
July  2002  (Leg.  H.  Sevgili). 

Description.  Male  (holotype):  Fastigium  of  vertex  (Fig.  1)  produced  anteriorly,  lateral  margins 
parallel  or  slightly  converging  anteriorly,  narrow,  about  l/3x  antennal  scape,  with  dorsal  groove. 

Disc  of  pronotum  (Fig.  2)  constricted  in  middle  of  length,  metazona  slightly  wider  than  prozona 
and  with  raised  margins  in  prozona  and  metazona;  anterior  and  posterior  margins  almost  straight;  in 


Vol.  114,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003  131 


profile  (Fig.  3),  dorsal  surface  of  pronotum  distinctly  concave,  ventral  edge  of  paranoia  slightly  con- 
vex and  passing  acutely  into  hind  margin  of  pronotum.  Tegmina  (Figs.  2-3)  1.2x  as  long  as  prono- 
tum; maximum  width  of  disc  of  left  tegmen  almost  as  wide  as  hind  margin  of  pronotum;  Cu2  3/4X  as 
long  as  hind  margin  of  pronotum,  not  thicker  than  3rd  antennal  segment;  tegmina  with  dense  rugose 
venation;  mirror  almost  quadrangular;  costal  area  large  with  venation.  Stridulatory  file  (Figs.  14-17) 
with  77-95  teeth  (n=  6)  not  quite  reaching  posterior  margin  of  tegmen,  spacing  largest  in  mid  part  of 
file;  in  ventral  view  slightly  fusiform  and  arcuate,  distal  and  proximal  part  of  file  gradually  narrowed; 
length  of  file  taken  as  shortest  distance  between  proximal  and  distal  most  tooth  about  2.85  mm.  Hind 
femur  about  4.25x  longer  than  pronotum,  without  ventral  spines. 

Epiproct  (Fig.  4)  transverse,  almost  twice  as  wide  as  long,  slightly  concave  at  hind  margin.  Cercus 
(Figs.  4-6a,  b)  long,  very  distinctly  incurved  in  apical  part;  incurved  part  long,  forming  about  right 
angle  with  longitudinal  axis  of  cercus,  slightly  tapering  towards  apex;  apex  pointed,  ending  in  a  dis- 
tinct and  black  denticle  on  apex  located  somewhat  dorsally.  Subgenital  plate  (Figs.  4,  8)  large  and 
relatively  long,  extending  beyond  middle  of  cerci  while  cerci  in  normal  position;  slightly  narrowed 
apically  with  distinct  trapezoidal  or  rounded  notch. 

Coloration:  Highly  variable  in  colouration  as  in  /.  redtenbacheri  (Bei-Bienko,  1954).  Males  be- 
long to  two  basic  colour  morphs;  almost  black  specimens  were  collected  in  lowlands  (600-1000  m 
altitudes),  light  brown  or  yellowish-green  specimens  in  subalpine  zones  of  Kackar  mountains  (Kac- 
kar  Dady).  In  both  morphs,  main  colour  of  tegmina  of  male  blackish  or  claret  red  in  subcoastal  and 
radial  areas  including  veins.  Abdomen  usually  two  light  longitudinal  bands  dorsally;  ventral  surface 
of  abdomen  yellow  or  red  in  some  specimens.  Apex  of  cercus  usually  black. 

Female:  Fastigium  of  vertex  as  in  male,  but  slightly  robust  at  apex.  Disc  of  pronotum  (Fig.  9) 
cylindrical,  slightly  constricted  in  mesozona,  prozona  and  metazona  of  equal  width;  in  profile  (Fig. 
10),  dorsal  surface  of  pronotum  slightly  concave,  metazona  slightly  raised;  ventral  edge  of  paranoia 
convex.  Tegmina  (Figs.  9-10)  about  0.7x  as  long  as  pronotum,  wilh  dense  rugose  venalion;  stridula- 
tory  area  of  right  tegmen  as  Fig.  1 1 . 

Cercus  short  and  conical,  slightly  longer  than  epiproct.  Subgenital  plate  (Fig.  12a,  b)  wider  than 
long,  posteriorly  rounded  or  usually  with  a  short  median  process  at  hind  margin.  Ovipositor  (Fig.  13) 
long  and  distinctly  upcurved,  about  2.2x  as  long  as  pronotum;  upper  margin  with  6-8,  lower  margin 
with  7-10  denticles  at  apical  part.  Gonangulum  slightly  swollen  anterio-dorsally,  hind  margin  slight- 
ly convex;  dorsal  part  narrower  than  ventral  part;  lamella  folded  with  gonangulum  forming  deep 
groove.  Coloration  similar  to  male,  but  green  specimens  are  dominant. 

Song:  (12  males  recorded)  The  male  calling  song  produced  throughout  the  day  but  mainly  at 
night.  The  song  consists  of  two  syllables  (Figs.  18-20),  recorded  at  23-29°C.  This  calling  song  can  be 
heard  mainly  in  July  and  August,  audible  at  a  distance  of  8-10  m.  The  song  can  be  formulated  as 
(A B)  or  sometimes  (A B+tick  or  isolated  impulse),  repeated  at  very  variable  intervals  (most- 
ly 6-10  s,  n=  18).  "After-tick"  are  also  usually  present.  The  average  duration  of  the  song  ranges 
between  453  ±  12  ms  (at  24°C)  and  395  ±  7  ms  (at  28-29°C).  The  average  gaps  between  two  sylla- 
bles is  about  261  ±  12  ms  (at  24°C)  and  199  ±  4  ms  (at  29°C).  The  average  number  of  impulses  of 
(A)  first  decrescendo  type  syllable  ranges  from  29  to  31.  The  second  syllable  (B)  is  crescendo  type 

and  consists  of  45-56  impulses.  The  first  syllable  period  (A )  lasts  about  334  ±  10  ms  (at  24°C)  and 

277  ±  3  (at  28-29°C).  The  duration  of  this  syllable  (A)  is  approximately  73  ms.  The  mean  duration  of 
second  syllable  (B)  longer  than  first,  evaluated  range  from  1 18  ±  7  ms  (at  24°C)  and  120  ±  6  ms  (at 
28-29°C). 

Measurements  (male,  n=  40;  female,  n=  25;  (mean  ±  SD)):  Length  of  body:  male  17.7-25  (21.6 
±  0.25),  female  19-23.8  (21 .7  ±  0.3);  pronotum:  male  3. 1  -4.2  (3.7  ±  0.04),  female  3.8-4.8  (4.4  ±  0.05); 
tegmina:  male  3.9-5  (4.6  ±  0.03),  female  2.4-3.5  (2.9  ±  0.1);  hind  femur:  male  14.4-17(15.9  ±  0.1), 
female  16-19.2  (17.5  ±  0.2);  ovipositor:  9-12  (10.5  ±  0.1 ). 

Material  examined  (52  males,  including  holotype,  25  females):  Turkey:  Holotype-male:  TR. 
Rize-  Camlyhemsin,  Meydan  koyii  ally  40°54'  N  40°56'  E,  900  m,  23  July  2002  (Leg.  H.  Sevgili). 
Paratypes:  same  locality,  1  male;-  Carnlyhernsin,  Palovit  deresi  ayrymy,  40"56'  N  40°58'  E,  600  m, 
July  23,  2002,  6  males,  2  females  (4  males,  I  female  in  alcohol);-  Camlyhemsin,  Zilkale  koyii, 
Yiiksek  otluklarda,  40°54'  N  40°56'  E,  885  m,  July  24,  2002,  2  males,  1  female  (1  male  in  alcohol);- 
Camlyhemsin,  Elevit,  Subalpin  zon,  40°51'  N  4  TOO'  E,  1X90  m,  July  24,  2002,  8  males,  2  females  (4 
males  in  alcohol)  (Leg.  H.  Sevgili);  Rize-  Meydan  koyii,  1 100  m,  July  18,  1991,  10  males,  2  females; 


132 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


12a 


Figs.  1-13.  Morphological  features  of  Isophya  rizeensis  n.  sp.  (Figs.  1-6,  8-13)  and  /. 
redtenbacheri  (Fig.  7);  1,  male  fastigium  of  vertex,  dorsal  view;  2,  male  pronotum  and 
tegmina,  dorsal  view;  3,  ditto,  lateral  view;  4,  male  epiproct,  cerci  and  subgenital  plate, 
dorsal  view;  5,  male  left  cercus;  6a,  b,  male  apical  parts  of  the  cerci;  7,  male  left  cercus 
of/,  redtenbacheri;  8,  male  subgenital  plate,  ventral  view;  9,  female  pronotum  and  tegmi- 
na, dorsal  view;  10,  ditto,  lateral  view;  11,  female  stridulatory  area  of  right  tegmen;  12a, 
b,  female  subgenital  plates;  13,  ovipositor.  Scales  1  mm. 


Vol.  114.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 


133 


Figs.  14-17.  Isophya  rizeensis  n.  sp.  Electron  micrographs  of  male  left  tegmina.  14, 
stridulatory  file,  ventral  view,  distal  end  to  the  left;  15,  idem,  proximal  part  of  file;  16, 
idem,  distal  part  of  file;  17,  idem,  mid  part  of  file. 


Rize-  Cat  diizii,  July  13,  1991,  1  female;-  Camlyhemsin,  Cat-Elevit  yolu,  July  9,  1990,  1  male:-  Cam- 
lyhemsin,  Cat  koyii,  Elevit  deresi,  July  16.  1991,  1  male;-  Camlyhemsin,  July  20,  19X9,  1  female;- 
C'amlyhemsin,  Cat,  July  20,  1989,  3  males,  4  females;-  Camlyhemsin,  Vanksi  yaylasy.  2150  m,  July 
11,  1991,  4  males,  2  females;-  Camlyhemsin,  Elevit  yaylasy,  2400  m,  July  17.  1991,  1  male  (Leg.  A. 
Demirsoy);-  Camlyhemsin,  Cat-Elevit  yojUi  juiy  9,  1990,  4  males,  1  female;-  Camlyhemsin,  Cat 
diizu,  July  9,  1989,  2  females  (Leg.  S.  S.  Caglar);-  Camlyhemsin,  Cat  dii/ii.  July  9,  1990,  5  males,  2 
females;-  Camlyhemsin,  Cat  koyii,  Vanksi  yaylasy,  July  9,  1990,  4  males,  2  females  (Leg.  S.  S. 
C'aglar  and  A.  Demirsoy);-  Kale-  Hemsin  yolu,  July  10,  1991,  1  male,  1  female  (Leg.  A.  Demirsoy) 
(HUZOM). 

Discussion:  This  new  species  is  well  characterised  in  the  male  by  the  stridu- 
latory file  and  abdominal  terminalia  and  in  the  female  by  the  ovipositor.  These 
characters  distinguish  it  clearly  from  all  other  described  species  of  the  genus 
Isophva.  I.  rizeensis,  I.  redtenbacheri  and  /.  gracilis  are  closely  related  species 
of  the  amplipennis  Group  (/.  amplipennis,  I.  redtenbacheri.  I.  rizeensis  sp.  n.,  /. 


134 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


' 


_ 


E 

i 


O 
O 


18 


20 


21 


Figs.  18-21.  Oscillograms  at  different  speeds  of  the  male  calling  songs  of  Isophya  rizeesis 
n.  sp.  (Figs.  18-20,  at  24°C)  and  /.  gracilis  (Fig.  21).  18,  four  calling  songs:  19,  two  call- 
ing songs  at  higher  resolution;  20,  one  calling  song  at  higher  resolution;  21,  one  calling 
song  of  I.  gracilis  (reprinted  from  Zhantiev  and  Dubrovin,  1977,  with  the  kind  permission 
of  R.  Zhantiev). 


Vol.  114.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 135 

speciosa,  I.  rodsjankoi,  I.  savignyi,  I.  splendida,  I.  uludaghensis,  I.  reticulata,  I. 
sureyai,  I.  gracilis,  I.  pylnovi,  I.  kalishevskii,  I.  caspica,  I.  hemiptera)  exhibiting 
similarities  in  the  structure  of  the  narrow  fastigium,  the  concave  pronotum  and 
tegmina  having  a  dense  rugose  venation.  /.  rizeensis  differs  from  /.  redtenbacheri 
in  the  larger  body  in  both  sexes,  the  shorter  incurvate  part  of  cerci  of  male  (Figs. 
4-5,  7)  and  distinctly  longer  ovipositor  (in  /.  redtenbacheri,  7-8.5  mm  according 
to  Bei-Bienko,  1954).  It  also  differs  from  /.  gracilis,  by  the  thinner  and  longer 
cerci,  bigger  apical  denticle  of  cerci  in  male  and  distinctly  longer  ovipositor  (in 
/.  gracilis,  7-7.5  mm  according  to  Bei-Bienko,  1954).  On  the  other  hand,  the 
structure  of  the  pronotum  and  tegmina  of  the  new  species  is  rather  similar  to  that 
of/,  amplipennis,  I.  reticulata  and  /.  speciosa  in  both  sexes.  /.  rizeensis  differs 
from  these  species  by  the  stridulatory  file  of  left  legmen,  cerci  and  subgenital 
plate  in  the  male  and  gonangulum  and  lamella  in  the  female.  The  stridulatory  file 
of  the  new  species  (with  77-95  teeth)  resembles  that  of/,  reticulata,  which  shows 
100-122  teeth  (n=  5).  In  contrary  to  fusiform  file  of/,  rizeensis,  the  files  of 
/.  amplipennis  (with  80-90  teeth)  and  /.  speciosa  (with  150-180  teeth)  become 
gradually  widened  towards  the  distal  part  (see  Heller,  1988). 

The  calling  song  of  /.  rizeensis  (Figs.  1 8-20)  resembles  that  of  /.  rodsjankoi 
(unpublished  data)  and  /.  gracilis  (Fig.  21,  see  Zhantiev  and  Dubrovin,  1977), 
but  some  of  the  song  parameters  of/,  gracilis  differ  from  that  of/,  rizeensis.  The 
duration  of  first  syllable  in  /.  rizeensis  is  longer  than  that  in  /.  gracilis.  I.  rizeen- 
sis and  /.  gracilis,  on  the  other  hand,  are  basically  similar  to  the  durations  of  sec- 
ond syllable,  the  gap  between  two  syllables  and  syllable  period,  but  the  ampli- 
tude modulation  of  the  song  is  clearly  different  (for  details  see  Zhantiev  and 
Dubrovin,  1977).  The  new  species  is  clearly  defined  by  its  song,  differing  in  sev- 
eral characters  from  /.  rodsjankoi.  The  duration  of  the  calling  song  of/,  rizeen- 
sis is  shorter  than  that  in  I.  rodsjankoi.  Besides,  the  number  of  impulses  of  sec- 
ond syllable  in  /.  rizeensis  appears  to  be  higher  than  in  /.  rodsjankoi.  On  the  other 
hand,  while  the  song  of  /.  rizeensis  consists  of  two  syllables,  /.  redtenbacheri's 
song  consists  of  only  one  crescendo  type  syllable  (unpublished  data). 

Distribution  and  habitats:  The  range  of  this  species  covers  a  small  area  of 
the  East  Black  Sea  Region  of  Turkey  (Fig.  22):  from  the  northern  slopes  of  Kac- 
kar  mountains  (between  600-2500  m  altitudes)  to  the  lowlands  of  Camlyhemsin 
town  in  Rize  province,  a  region  of  abundant  rainfall.  The  distribution  area  of 
this  species  is  situated  in  the  Colchic  sector  of  Euxinian  province  of  Euro- 
Siberian  phytogeographical  region.  Its  vegetation  consists  of  the  formations  of 
mesophytic  forests,  alpine  meadows  and  scrubs.  According  to  our  observations, 
this  species  occurs  in  forest  communities  including  ferns,  glades  and  shrubs  in 
lowlands,  subalpine  scrubs  and  meadows  in  highlands.  The  new  species  oc- 
curred syntopically  with  some  other  bushcrickets,  such  as  Poecilimon  schmidti, 
P.  similis,  Phonochorion  spp.,  Pholidoptera  griseoaptera  in  lowlands  and 
Psorodonotus  specularis  and  Phonochorion  in  subalpine  and  alpine  zones.  Its 
nymphs  are  mainly  found  in  the  beginning  of  June  and  adults  are  found  in  July 
and  August. 


136 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Etymology:  Rize  Province  has  many  high  mountains  in  the  East  Black  Sea 
Region  of  Turkey  containing  numerous  endemic  faunal  and  floral  elements. 


Fig.  22.  Map  of  Rize  Province,  East  Black  Sea  Region  of  Turkey.  The  stippled 
area  indicates  the  distribution  of  Isophya  rizeensis  n.  sp. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  am  grateful  to  AH  Demirsoy  and  Selim  Siialp  Caglar,  Department  of  Biology, 
Hacettepe  University,  for  collecting  a  lot  of  specimens  of  the  new  species.  I  sin- 
cerely thank  Battal  Cyplak,  Department  of  Biology,  Akdeniz  University,  for  in- 
formation helpful  in  clarifying  some  taxonomic  questions.  I  would  like  to  thank 
Dr.  Klaus-Gerhart  Heller  for  obtaining  some  articles.  For  allowing  me  to  repro- 
duce their  figure,  I  am  indebted  to  Dr.  Rustem  Zhantiev  and  N.  N.  Dubrovin. 
Special  thanks  to  Rustem  Zhantiev,  Department  of  Entomology,  Moscow  State 
University,  for  permission  for  reproduction  of  figure  21  from  his  paper  (1977). 
Also,  my  special  thanks  go  to  two  anonymous  reviewers  for  their  constructive 
comments.  The  research  was  supported  by  the  Scientific  and  Technical  Research 
Council  of  Turkey. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 137 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bei-Bienko,  G.  Ya.  1954.  Phaneropterinae.  Fauna  of  the  USSR,  Orthoptera  Vol.  II,  No.  2.  Moskva- 
Leningrad.  Israel  Program  for  Scientific  Translation.  Jerusalem,  Israel.  1965.  381  pp. 

Cyplak,  B.,  A.  Demirsoy,  H.  Sevgili,  and  Yalym,  B.  2002.  Tiirkiye'nin  Orthoptera  (Cekirgeler= 
Diizkanatlylar)  faunasy.  //;,  Demirsoy,  A.  (Editor).  Genel  Zoocografya  ve  Tiirkiye  Zoocografyasy 
"Hayvan  Cografyasy."  Meteksan  A.  S.,  Ankara,  Tiirkiye.  pp.  681-707. 

Harz,  K.  1969.  Die  Orthopteren  Europas.  I  Series  Entomologica  5.  Dr.  W.  Junk,  The  Hague,  The 

Netherlands,  pp.  1-749. 

Heller,  K.-G.  1988.  Bioakustik  der  europaischen  Laubheuschrecken.  Verlag  J.  Margraf.  Weikers- 
heim,  Germany.  358  pp. 

Heller,  K.-G.  1990.  Evolution  of  song  pattern  in  east  Mediterranean  Phaneropterinae:  constraints 
by  the  communication  system,  pp.  130-151.  In.  Bailey  W.  J.  and  D.  C.  F.  Rentz  (Editors).  The 
Tettigoniidae.  Biology,  systematics  and  evolution.  Springer- Verlag.  Berlin,  Germany.  395  pp. 

Heller,  K.-G.,  O.  Korsunovskaya,  D.  R.  Ragge,  V.  Vedenina,  F.  Willemse,  R.  D.  Zhantiev,  and 
L.  Frantsevich.  1998.  Check-List  of  European  Orthoptera.  Articulata.  Beiheft  7:1-61. 

Ingrisch,  S.  1991 .  Taxonomie  der  Isophya-Arten  der  Ostalpen  (Grylloptera:  Phaneropteridae).  Mit- 
teilungen  der  Schweizerischen  Entomologischen  Gesellschaft  64:269-279. 

Karabag,  T.  1958.  The  Orthoptera  fauna  of  Turkey  (Turkiye'nin  Orthoptera  Faunasy).  Ankara  Uni- 
versitesi  Yayynlary,  Ankara,  Turkey.  198  pp.  (in  English  and  Turkish). 

Karabag,  T.  1962.  Some  new  and  little  known  Phaneropterinae  (Orthoptera:  Tettigoniidae).  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Royal  Entomological  Society  of  London  (B)  31:4-8. 

Orci,  K.  M.,  G.  Szovenyi,  and  B.  Nagy.  2001.  Description  of  the  song  of  Isophya  beybienkoi 
(Orthoptera,  Tettigonioidea).  Biologia  56:489-495. 

Otte,  D.,  D.  C.  Eades,  and  P.  Naskrecki.  2004.  Orthoptera  Species  File  Online  (Version  2.1). 
http://osf2.orthoptera.org/entry/OSF2Frameset.htm  10  March  2004. 

Ragge,  D.  R.  and  W.  J.  Reynolds.  1998.  The  songs  of  the  grasshoppers  and  crickets  of  western 
Europe.  Harley  Books.  Colchester,  England.  591  pp. 

Ramme,  W.  1951.  Zur  Systematik,  Faunistik  und  Biologic  der  Orthopteren  von  Sudost-Europa  und 
Vorderasien.  Mitteilungen  aus  dem  Zoologischen  Museum  in  Berlin  27:1-431. 

Sevgili,  H.  and  K.-G.  Heller.  2003.  A  new  species  of  the  genus  Isophya  Brunner  von  Wattenwyl 
from  Turkey  (Orthoptera,  Tettigoniidae,  Phaneropterinae).  Tijdschrift  voor  Entomologie  146:39- 
44. 

Stumpner,  A.  and  S.  Meyer.  2001.  Songs  and  the  function  of  song  elements  in  four  duelling  bush- 
cricket  species  (Ensifera,  Phaneropteridae,  Barbitistes).  Journal  of  Insect  Behavior  14:51 1-534. 

Zhantiev,  R.  D.  and  N.  N.  Dubrovin.  1977.  Sound  communication  in  the  genus  Isophya  (Orth- 
optera, Tettigoniidae).  Zoologicheskii  Zhurnal  56:38-51. 

Zhantiev,  R.  D.  and  O.  S.  Korsunovskaya.  1986.  Sound  communication  in  bushcrickets  (Tetti- 
goniidae, Phaneropterinae)  of  the  European  part  of  USSR.  Zoologicheskii  Zhurnal  65:1 151-1 163. 


138  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BIOLOGICAL  NOTES  ON  MEXICAN 

(COLEOPTERA:  LUCANIDAE) 
LUCANUS  (PSEUDOLUCANUS)  MAZAMA  (LECONTE)1 

Pedro  Reyes-Castillo,2  Imelda  Martinez  M.,'  and  Maria  Luisa  Castillo2 

ABSTRACT:  Lucanus  (Pseudolucanus)  mazama  (LeConte  1861)  lives  in  Mexican  Quercus  (oak) 
forests  in  decaying  logs,  where  both  adults  and  larvae  are  commonly  found.  The  species  is  distrib- 
uted in  mixed  pine-oak  forests  of  the  Sierra  Madre  Occidental,  in  areas  of  the  Mexican  states  of 
Chihuahua  and  Sonora.  The  male  reproductive  apparatus  is  composed  by  2  testicles,  each  with  12  tes- 
ticular  follicles,  and  2  vas  deferentia,  2  accessory  glands,  an  ejaculatory  bulb,  and  an  ejaculatory  duct. 
In  females,  the  reproductive  apparatus  consists  of  2  ovaries,  each  with  12  ovarioles,  and  2  lateral 
oviducts,  the  common  oviduct,  bursa  copulatrix,  spermatheca  with  its  gland,  and  vagina. 

KEY  WORDS:  Lucanus  (Pseudolucanus)  mazama,  Coleoptera,  Lucanidae,  Mexico. 

The  Lucanidae  family  is  a  relatively  small  group  of  Scarabaeoidea,  distributed 
widely  around  the  world.  Six  Mexican  species  have  been  recorded  (Maes  1992), 
representing  about  0.5  percent  of  species  known  worldwide.  Most  of  these  spe- 
cies are  endemic  and  known  only  on  the  basis  of  one  or  two  adult  specimens, 
since  they  are  often  difficult  to  collect.  Lucanus  (Pseudolucanus)  mazama 
(LeConte  1861 )  is  a  Mexican  stag  beetle  species  that  is  large  and  relatively  abun- 
dant. Although  it  was  described  from  the  United  States,  where  it  is  found  in 
Arizona,  Colorado,  New  Mexico,  and  Utah  (Maes  1992),  it  was  recorded  by 
Parry  (1875)  in  northern  Mexico,  in  the  states  of  Chihuahua  (Bates  1889,  Villada 
1901)  and  Sonora  (Benesh  1944). 

Stag  beetle  reproductive  systems  have  been  studied  in  few  species,  most  of 
them  European.  Bordas  (1900)  described  the  reproductive  apparatus  of  males  of 
Dorcus  parallelipipedus  (Linne  1735)  and  Lucanus  cervus  (Linne  1758);  the  lat- 
ter was  illustrated  by  Franciscolo  (1997),  as  was  the  typical  scheme  of  the  female 
Dorcinae.  The  only  North  American  species  known  in  this  regard  is  the  male  L. 
capreolus  (Linne  1763),  described  by  Williams  (1945).  In  a  comparative  study  of 
the  number  of  ovarioles  (per  ovary)  in  Scarabaeoidea,  Ritcher  and  Baker  (1974) 
observe  that  this  number  varies  among  different  subfamilies  of  Lucanidae,  from 
6-6  in  Aesalinae  and  Platycerinae,  to  12-12  in  Sinodendroninae  and  Lucaninae. 
Holloway  (1960,  1998)  studied  numerous  morphological  structures  of  Lucanidae 
adults,  and,  considering  the  complete  cuticular  structures  of  the  male  and  female 
genitalia,  concluded  that  they  "exhibit  characters  of  high  taxonomic  and  phylo- 
genetic  value." 

Precise  information  had  previously  been  lacking  on  the  distribution  of 
Mexican  L.  mazama,  its  habits,  larval  development,  and  male  and  female  repro- 
ductive anatomy.  These  subjects  are  dealt  with  in  the  present  paper. 


1  Received  on  August  10,  2001.  Accepted  on  November  29,  2003. 

:  Institute  de  Ecologia,  A.C.,  Departamcnto  de  Biologia  de  Suelos,  km.2.5  Carretera  antigua  a  Coate- 
pec  #351,  Congregacion  El  Haya,  91070  Xalapa,  Veracruz,  Mexico.  E-mails:  reyespe(a'ecologia. 
edu.mx,  maluisac@ecologia.edu. mx,  respectively. 

1  Departamento  de  Ecologia  y  Comportamiento  Animal.  Apartado  Postal  No.  63.  9 1 000  Xalapa,  Vera- 
cruz, Mexico.  E-mail:  imelda@ecologia. edu.mx. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Vol.  114,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 139 

METHODS 

This  study  examined  20  Mexican  L.  mazama  adults  from  the  collections  of  the 
Institute  de  Ecologia,  A.C.  (IE),  Xalapa,  Mexico,  and  the  Museum  national 
d'Histoire  naturelle  (MNHN)  Paris,  France. 

Sixteen  third-instar  larvae  of  L.  mazama  were  collected  on  July  13,  1996,  2  km 
to  the  south  of  Yepachic  (Chihuahua),  in  a  large  oak  (Quercus)  stump,  in  a  mixed 
pine-oak  forest,  at  an  altitude  of  1,660  m.  The  larvae  were  maintained  alive  in  a 
terrarium  at  a  relative  humidity  of  80  percent  and  a  temperature  of  23.3°C  ±3.1, 
supplied  with  abundant  wood  and  decaying  detritus  of  oak  and  Bursera  simaru- 
ba,  until  pupation  occurred  and  the  imagos  emerged. 

A  male  that  emerged  November  29,  1996,  was  dissected  June  16,  1997,  and  a 
female  that  emerged  November  3,  1996,  was  dissected  November  21,  1996,  to 
examine  their  reproductive  apparatus,  which  were  maintained  in  Ringer  saline 
solution,  fixed  in  AFATD  (ethyl  alcohol  96°-formaldehyde  trichloroacetic  acid- 
dimethylsulfoxide),  and  stained  in  toto  with  Feulgen-green  light.  Some  organs 
were  included  in  Celoidina*-Parafina  Histosec*,  and  histological  sections  of  7um 
were  stained  using  the  technique  of  PAS-Heidenhain  hematoxylin  (Martinez 
1999).  Cuticular  structures  were  macerated  with  potassium  hydroxide  and 
stained  with  chlorazol  black  (Carayon  1969). 

The  rest  of  the  adults,  two  males  and  three  females,  were  kept  as  separate 
male-female  pairs,  in  two  terraria  with  decaying  wood,  at  a  relative  humidity  of 
80  percent  and  a  temperature  of  25.8°C  ±1.8,  from  February  1997  until  their 
deaths  in  May  1998.  From  among  these  insects,  a  male,  which  had  emerged 
November  27,  1996,  was  selected  for  dissection  after  it  had  copulated,  an  event 
that  occurred  on  May  15,  1998. 

The  anatomical  terms  used  here  to  describe  reproductive  apparatus  are  those 

proposed  by  Snodgrass  (1933)  and  Tuxen  (1970). 

Material  Examined.  Mexico:  coll.  E.  Borel/  2  males  (MNHN-Paris);  /H6ge/ex  coll.  Bolieau/  1 
female  (MNHN-Paris);  /Hoge/  1  male  (MNHN-Paris);  Chihuahua:  /Santa  Clara/H6ge/Ex  Musaeo  H. 
W.  Bates  1892/  1  male,  1  female  (MNHN-Paris);  /Santa  Clara/H6ge/ex  coll.  Bolieau/  1  male 
(MNHN-Paris);  Chihuahua:  2  km  south  of  Yepachic,  13-VII-1996,  P.  Reyes  and  D.  W.  Edmonds, 
coll./  altitude  1 ,660  m,  mixed  pine-oak  forest,  in  a  decaying  oak  log/  2  males,  3  females,  5  third-instar 
larvae  (lE-Mex);  2  km  south  of  Yepachic,  12-VI1-1996,  P.  Reyes  and  D.  W.  Edmonds,  coll.  /altitude 
1,660  m,  mixed  pine-oak  forest,  in  a  rotting  oak  log/  Imale  pupa,  1  female  pupa,  and  3  males  and  4 
females  that  emerged  in  the  laboratory  during  October  and  November,  1996  (lE-Mex);  Sonora: 
/Yecora/15-VII-1966/P.  Reyes  and  W.  D.  Edmonds,  coll./altitude  1,400  m,  by  light,  between  21:00 
and  23:30  hours/  1  male  (lE-Mex);  /Puerto  de  La  Cruz,  10  km  east  of  Yecora/17-VII-1996/P.  Reyes, 
coll./altitude  1,770  m,  in  a  rotting  oak  log/1  adult  remains,  1  third-instar  larva  (lE-Mex). 

RESULTS 

Distribution  and  habits.  On  the  dates  indicated  above,  adult  males  and 
females  and  larvae  were  collected  from  decaying  oak  (Quercus  spp.)  stumps  and 
logs  that  are  found  in  mixed  pine-oak  forests  between  the  altitudes  of  1 ,400  and 
1,770  m  in  the  Sierra  Madre  Occidental,  in  the  states  of  Chihuahua  and  Sonora. 
One  male  adult  was  attracted  by  light  in  July.  On  being  collected,  adults  showed 
thanatosis  and  the  larvae  stridulated. 


140 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


"9 


t  • 


Fig.  1 .  Scheme  of  male  Pseudolucanus  mazama  reproductive  apparatus  (ag,  accessory 
gland;  cw,  cuticular  wall  of  the  ejaculatory  duct;  eb,  ejaculatory  bulb;  ed,  ejaculatory  duct; 
mw,  external  muscular  wall  of  the  ejaculatory  duct;  te,  testis;  tf,  testicular  follicle;  vd,  vas 
deferens). 


Of  a  total  16  third-instar  larvae  maintained  live  in  the  laboratory  (at  a  relative 
humidity  of  80  percent  and  temperature  of  23.3°C  ±  3. 1 1 ),  7  died,  while  9  devel- 
oped to  the  pupa  stage;  of  the  latter,  7  reached  the  adult  stage  (3  males  and  4 
females).  The  larvae  remained  buried  the  entire  time,  active  in  the  wood  and 
decaying  detritus  that  served  them  as  both  food  and  substrate.  Pupation  occurred 
in  the  detritus,  apparently  without  construction  of  a  cocoon.  In  5  larvae,  the  pre- 
pupa-pupa  period  lasted  from  5  to  8  days.  In  7  larvae,  the  period  from  pupa  to 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 


141 


adult  lasted  between  31  and  35  days.  Adults  showed  surprising  longevity  in  the 
laboratory  (maintained  at  a  relative  humidity  of  80  percent  and  temperature  of 
25.8°C  ±  1 .8),  up  to  18  months,  during  which  time  they  showed  little  activity  and 
almost  no  feeding.  In  early  May  1998,  one  pair  appeared  to  be  preparing  to  mate 
and  the  female  fed  on  dead  wood.  The  adults  spent  most  of  their  time  buried 
between  the  terrarium  floor  and  the  bottom  of  the  decaying  log. 

Male  reproductive  system.  The  male  reproductive  system  consists  of  2 
testes,  each  with  12  testicular  follicles,  and  2  vas  deferentia,  2  accessory  glands, 
an  ejaculatory  bulb,  and  an  ejaculatory  duct  (Fig.  1). 

The  reproductive  structures  of  a  young  male  that  had  emerged  six  and  a  half 
months  prior  to  study  and  which  was  dissected  on  June  16,  1997,  were  sur- 
rounded by  abundant  fat-body  and  tracheoles.  In  contrast,  the  male  dissected  1 8 
months  after  emergence,  on  May  15,  1998,  did  not  show  similar  fat-body  mate- 
rial, but  did  show  abundant  tracheoles,  and  its  testicular  follicles  were  smaller 
than  those  of  the  younger  male. 

Testicular  follicles  of  both  younger  and  older  males  were  free,  without  a  cov- 
ering membrane,  and  spherical,  though  slightly  flattened  in  the  dorsoventral 
direction.  In  histological  observation,  the  follicles  are  radial.  In  the  young  male, 
the  testes  were  immature,  showing  only  primary  and  secondary  spermatocyte 
cysts,  and  not  fully  developed  spermatozoa.  In  the  18-month-old  male  that  had 
copulated  shortly  before  dissection,  the  histological  structure  of  the  testicular  fol- 
licles showed  degenerating  cysts  without  a  trace  of  spermatozoa  (Fig.  2).  Most 
likely,  spermatogenesis  had  not  occurred,  and  copulation  had  not  been  function- 
al. 

A  relatively  long  vas  efferens  emerges  from  each  testicular  follicle.  All  the  vas 
efferentia  flow  into  the  vas  deferens  of  their  respective  testicle.  The  vas  deferen- 
tia show  three  different  regions:  a  straight  region  on  leaving  the  follicles,  a  volu- 


B 


Fig.  2.  Microphotographs  of  histological  sections  of  Pseudolucanus  mazanui  testicular 
ollicles:  (A)  in  a  recently  emerged  male,  (B)  in  a  male  one  year  after  emergence  (c,  cysts; 
g,  germanium;  ts,  testicular  septa;  ve,  vas  efferens).  The  same  scale  is  used  in  both  photo- 
graphs. 


142  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


minous  region  in  which  they  curl  around  themselves,  and  an  enlarged  region  that 
narrows  near  emergence  in  the  ejaculatory  bulb. 

The  accessory  glands  are  tubiform,  relatively  long,  and  rolled  around  them- 
selves. They  both  discharge,  parallel  to  the  vas  deferentia,  in  the  anterior  part  of 
the  ejaculatory  bulb. 

The  ejaculatory  bulb  is  very  small  and  thick,  almost  spherical.  It  is  formed  of 
a  relatively  thick  cuticular  intima,  surrounded  by  a  muscular  cloak  that  is  not 
very  thick.  The  2  vas  deferentia  and  2  accessory  glands  open  into  the  anterior 
region  of  the  ejaculatory  bulb.  The  ejaculatory  duct  emerges  from  the  ejaculato- 
ry bulb's  posterior  region. 

The  ejaculatory  duct  is  very  long  and  has  two  distinct  regions  of  about  the 
same  length.  The  anterior  part,  emerging  from  the  ejaculatory  bulb,  has  a  cutic- 
ular intima  covering  the  duct  and  a  thick  muscular  wall  toward  the  exterior.  The 
posterior  section  narrows;  while  the  interior  diameter  of  the  duct  remains  the 
same  as  in  the  anterior  region,  the  duct's  muscular  wall  here  is  much  thinner.  This 
posterior  section  gives  into  the  aedeagus,  which  has  a  permanently  everted  inter- 
nal sac  with  a  long  terminal  flagellum. 

Female  reproductive  system.  The  female  reproductive  system  is  formed  of 
two  ovaries,  each  with  12  ovarioles,  and  two  lateral  oviducts,  a  common  oviduct, 
the  bursa  copulatrix,  spermatheca  with  its  gland,  and  vagina  (Fig.  3). 

The  entire  reproductive  apparatus  is  surrounded  with  abundant  fatty  material 
and  numerous  tracheoles,  to  such  a  degree  that  during  dissection  it  was  difficult 
to  distinguish  the  different  structures.  These  structures  became  clearer  after  being 
stained  in  toto  with  Feulgen-green  light,  or  after  maceration  and  staining  of  the 
cuticular  structures  with  chlorazol  black. 

The  female  studied  had  recently  emerged  and  was  immature.  Each  telotrophic 
ovariole  presented  a  germarium,  a  vitellarium  without  oocytes,  and  a  long  pedi- 
cel (Fig.  4).  The  pedicels  of  the  ovarioles  of  each  ovary  ended  in  a  calix.  In  each 
ovary,  the  ovarioles  and  calix  were  enveloped  in  a  membrane.  Each  ovary's  calix 
continued  until  it  met  the  corresponding  lateral  oviduct.  Both  lateral  oviducts  ter- 
minated in  the  common  oviduct,  which  was  relatively  long  and  surrounded  by 
abundant  muscular  tissue,  and  which  terminated  in  the  vagina. 

The  spermatheca  was  a  large,  sclerotized  structure,  formed  by  the  spermathe- 
cal  capsule,  a  duct,  and  a  gland.  The  spermathecal  capsule  was  heavily  sclero- 
tized and  surrounded  by  abundant  glandular  tissue.  The  cuticular  spermathecal 
duct  was  surrounded  by  a  thick  coat  of  muscular  tissue  that  emerged  from  the 
base  of  the  capsule.  The  duct's  posterior  region  was  thicker  and  had  a  folded 
wall,  joining  the  anterior  part  of  the  vagina  between  the  common  oviduct  and  the 
bursa  copulatrix.  The  spermathecal  gland  was  cuticular  and  surrounded  by  glan- 
dular tissue  that  was  not  very  thick;  the  gland's  duct  was  short,  ending  in  the  base 
of  the  spermathecal  capsule. 

The  bursa  copulatrix  had  a  highly  folded  cuticular  intima,  surrounded  by  a 
muscular  wall.  Before  terminating  in  the  anterior  part  of  the  vagina,  the  posted- 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


143 


v  u 


Fig.  3.  Scheme  of  female  Pseudolucanus  mazama  reproductive  apparatus  (be,  bursa  cop- 
ulatrix;  ca,  calix;  ci,  cuticular  intima  seen  through  the  muscular  wall;  co,  common 
oviduct;  g,  germarium;  gt,  glandular  tissue  covering  the  spermathecal  capsule;  lo,  lateral 
oviduct;  mw,  muscular  wall;  ov,  ovary;  p,  pedicel;  sc,  spermathecal  capsule;  sg,  sper- 
mathecal gland;  sp,  spermatheca;  sd,  spermathecal  duct;  v,  vagina;  vu,  vulva). 


or  section  of  the  bursa  copulatrix  leaned  against  the  base  of  the  spermathecal 
duct.  At  this  point,  these  two  structures  were  enveloped  by  the  same  coat  of  mus- 
cular tissue. 

The  vagina's  cuticular  intima  was  highly  folded  and  surrounded  by  a  thick 
coat  of  muscular  tissue.  The  vagina  comprised  two  different  regions.  The  anteri- 
or section  was  bulky.  The  common  oviduct  joined  this  section  toward  its  begin- 
ning, while  the  bursa  copulatrix  and  the  spermatheca  joined  this  section  lateral- 


144 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SOOjum 


UN. 


Fig.  4.  Microphotographs  of  Pseudolucanus  mazama  ovarioles:  (A)  in  toto,  (B)  in  a  his- 
tological  section  (g,  germarium;  vi,  vitellarium;  p,  pedicel).  The  same  scale  is  used  in  both 
photographs. 


ly.  The  posterior  part  of  the  vagina  was  straight,  terminating  in  a  vulva  that 
opened  to  the  exterior. 

DISCUSSION 

Lucanus  mazama  belongs  to  a  genus  with  wide  holarctic  and  oriental  distri- 
bution. The  genus's  63  species  include  5  known  in  North  America;  of  these,  L. 
mazama  alone  reaches  the  north  of  Mexico  (Maes  1992).  L.  mazama  distribution 
in  Mexico  occurs  in  woods  of  boreal  origin,  a  mix  of  pine  and  oak,  in  the  Sierra 
Madre  Occidental.  The  species  maintains  holarctic  affinities,  being  adapted  to 
colder  weather,  and  in  the  Mexican  zone  of  transition  shows  a  nearctic  dispersal 
pattern  (sensu  Halffter  1976). 

In  Mexico,  L.  mazama  lives  in  rotting  stumps  and  logs,  with  a  preference  for 
oak  (Quercus  spp.).  Both  adults  and  larvae  are  commonly  found  in  these  habi- 
tats. The  adults  are  sometimes  attracted  to  light.  These  characteristics  are  shared 
by  two  related  North  American  species,  L.  capreolus  and  L.  placidus  (Say  1825) 
(Ritcher  1966,  Mathieu  1969),  though  the  larvae  of  these  two  latter  species 
appear  more  polyphagous.  The  surprising  longevity  found  in  nonfeeding  L. 
mazama  adults — 18  months  in  the  laboratory — contrasts  with  the  longevity  of  L. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 145 

capreolus,  which  has  been  observed  to  live  in  the  laboratory  for  just  3  months 
with  a  diet  of  sugared  water  provided  through  a  piece  of  cotton  (Mathieu  1969). 

The  present  study  provides  the  first  complete  description  of  I.  mazama  repro- 
ductive apparatus,  both  male  and  female. 

In  the  male,  the  reproductive  anatomy  resembles  that  of  L.  capreolus,  studied 
by  Williams  (1945),  with  equal  numbers  of  testicular  follicles  (12-12),  and  also 
that  of  I.  cervus,  which  has  10-10  testicular  follicles,  and  of  Dorcus  parallelip- 
ipedus,  which  has  from  10-10  to  12-12  testicular  follicles,  as  studied  by  Bordas 
(1900).  These  two  authors  described  seminal  vesicles  in  these  species,  but  in  L. 
mazama  we  observed  no  dilation  of  the  vas  deferentia  that  would  respond  to  such 
seminal  vesicles.  Lack  of  seminal  vesicles  is  a  common  characteristic  of  other 
Scarabaeoidea  species,  notably  those  of  the  dung  beetle  subfamilies  (Pluot-Sig- 
walt  and  Martinez  1998).  The  aedeagus  of  L.  mazama  agrees  with  that  of  other 
Lucaninae  (Holloway  1960)  in  having  a  permanently  everted  internal  sac  and 
basal  piece  that  does  not  surround  the  median  lobe.  The  permanently  everted 
internal  sac  in  L.  mazama  terminates  in  a  long  flagellum. 

We  have  no  detailed  description  of  female  reproductive  anatomy  in  Lucanidae 
species,  except  the  general  scheme  of  Dorcinae  put  forward  by  Franciscolo 
(1997).  This  scheme  is  generally  consistent  with  our  observations  on  L.  mazama, 
which  shows  12-12  ovarioles,  the  same  number  found  by  Ritcher  and  Baker 
(1974)  in  a  female  of  this  species  from  Arizona,  in  Sinodendron  nigosum  Man- 
nerheim  1843,  and  in  other  Scarabaeoidea  (Rutelinae  and  Cetoniinae). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  W.  David  Edmonds,  who  provided  valuable  assistance  with  field  work.  We  are  espe- 
cially grateful  to  Berveley  A.  Holloway  and  Luca  Bartolozi  for  a  review  of  the  manuscript. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bates,  H.  W.   1889.  Biologia  Centrali-Americana,  Insecta,  Coleoptera,  Lucanidae,  Passalidae.  Sup- 
plement vol.  2,  part  2,  337-416. 

Benesh,   B.   1944.  A  new  Dorcus   from   Mexico   (Coleop.:   Lucanidae).   Entomological   News 
55(2):45-47. 

Bordas,  L.   1900.  Recherches  sur  les  organes  reproducteurs  males  des  Coleopteres.  Annales  des 
Sciences  naturelles,  Zoologie  et  Biologic  1 1:283-448. 

Carayon,  J.   1969.  Emploi  du  noir  chlorazol  en  anatomic  microscopique  des  insectes.  Annales  de  la 
Societe  Entomologique  de  France  (nouvelle  serie)  5(1):179-193. 

Franciscolo,  ML  E.  1997.  Fauna  d' Italia.  Vol.  XXXV.  Coleoptera  Lucanidae.  Edizioni  Calderini, 
Bologna,  Italia,  xi  +  228  pp. 

Halfftcr,  G.   1976.  Distribucion  de  los  insectos  en  la  zona  de  transicicSn  mexicana.  Relaciones  con 
la  entomofauna  de  Norteamerica.  Folia  Entomologica  Mexicana  35:1-64. 

Holloway,  B.  A.   1960.  Taxonomy  and  phylogeny  in  the  Lucanidae  (Insecta:  Coleoptera).  Records 
of  the  Dominion  Museum  3(4):32 1-365. 


146  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Holloway,  B.  A.  1998.  A  re-valuation  of  the  genera  of  New  Zeland  aesaline  stag  beetles  (Cole- 
optera:  Lucanidae).  Journal  of  the  Royal  Society  of  New  Zealand  28(4):64 1-656. 

LeConte,  J.  L.  1861.  New  species  of  Coleoptera  inhabiting  the  Pacific  district  of  the  United  States. 
Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  13:338-359. 

Maes,  J-M.  1992.  Lista  de  los  Lucanidae  (Coleoptera)  del  mundo.  Revista  Nicaragiiense  de 
Entomologia  22: 1  - 1 2 1 . 

Martinez,  M.  I.  1999.  Estudio  de  la  anatomia  microscopica  en  insectos:  tecnicas  basicas.  Folia 
Entomologica  Mexicana  105:65-76. 

Mathieu,  J.  M.  1969.  Mating  behaviour  of  five  species  of  Lucanidae  (Coleoptera:  Insecta). 
Canadian  Entomologist  101(10):  1054- 1062. 

Parry,  F.  J.  S.   1875.  Catalogus  Coleopterorum  Lucanidorum.  3rd  ed.  E.  W.  Jason,  London.  29  pp. 

Pluot-Sigwalt,  D.  and  I.  Martinez  M.  1998.  Anatomie  morpho-fonctionnelle  de  1'appareil  genital 
male  des  Coleopteres  Scarabaeoidea  coprophages:  donnees  comparatives.  Annies  de  la  Societe 
Entomologique  de  France  (nouvelle  serie)  34(4):4 19-444. 

Ritcher,  P.  O.  1966.  White  grubs  and  their  allies.  A  study  of  North  American  scarabaeoid  larvae. 
Oregon  State  Monographs.  Studies  in  Entomology.  219  pp. 

Ritcher,  P.  O.  and  C.  W.  Baker.  1974.  Ovariole  numbers  in  Scarabaeoidea  (Coleoptera:  Lucanidae, 
Passalidae,  Scarabaeidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  76(4):480- 
494. 

Snodgrass,  R.  E.  1933.  Morphology  of  the  insect  abdomen.  Part  II.  The  genital  ducts  and  the  ovipo- 
sition.  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous  Collections  89(8):1-148. 

Tuxen,  S.  L.   1970.  Taxonomist's  glossary  of  genitalia  in  insects.  Munksgaard,  Copenhagen.  359  pp. 

Villada,  M.  M.  1901.  Catalogo  de  la  coleccion  de  coleopteros  mexicanos  del  Museo  Nacional,  for- 
mada  y  clasificada  por  el  Dr.  D.  Eugenio  Duges.  (Salon  de  Entomologia).  2nd  ed.  Museo 
Nacional,  Mexico.  148  pp.  +  12  figs. 

Williams,  J.  L.  1945.  The  anatomy  of  the  internal  genitalia  of  some  Coleoptera.  Proceedings  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  Washington  47(4):73-91. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 147 

IMMATURE  STAGES  OF  SINOPLA  PERPUNCTATUS 

(HETEROPTERA:  ACANTHOSOMATIDAE) 

FROM  ARGENTINA1 

P.  Martinez,2  P.  M.  Dellape,2  M.  del  C.  Coscaron,2  and  H.  Giganti1 

ABSTRACT:  The  five  instars  of  the  acanthosomatid  Sinopla  perpunctatus  are  described  and  illus- 
trated. Descriptions  include  morphological  and  morphometric  characters  of  specimens  from  Neuquen 
(Argentina)  collected  on  Nothofagus  sp.  (Fagaceae). 

KEY  WORDS:  Sinopla  perpunctatus,  Heteroptera,  Acanthosomatidae,  immature  stages,  Argentina. 

The  family  Acanthosomatidae,  a  member  of  the  superfamily  Pentatomoidea, 
contains  about  180  species  in  45  genera  (Kumar,  1974;  Rolston  and  Kumar, 
1974).  Its  geographic  range  is  mostly  in  the  Southern  Hemisphere,  but  it  does 
extend  north  into  Europe,  Asia,  and  North  America.  The  genus  Sinopla  Signoret 
1863  belongs  to  the  Blaudisinae,  a  subfamily  that  occurs  in  South  America, 
South  Africa,  and  Australia,  with  one  genus  recorded  from  Madagascar.  Sinopla 
perpunctatus  is  restricted  to  the  southern  portion  of  the  Western  Hemisphere 
(Chile  and  Argentina).  Little  is  known  about  the  biology  of  most  austral  species 
(Schuh  and  Slater,  1995).  Recently,  Carter  and  Hoebeke  (2003)  described  in 
detail  the  seasonal  history  and  duration  of  the  immature  stages  of  Elasmostethus 
atricornis  Van  Duzee,  which  is  distributed  in  the  Palaeartic,  Oriental,  and  Au- 
stralian Regions  extending  to  the  Neartic.  Maternal  care  of  eggs  and  young 
nymphs  has  been  mentioned  only  for  Neartic  and  Paleartic  species.  (Bequaert, 
1935).  In  this  contribution,  we  describe  the  five  nymphal  instars  of  Sinopla  per- 
punctatus Signoret. 

METHODS 

We  studied  a  total  of  21  specimens  from  Neuquen  (Argentina),  collected  on 
Nothofagus  sp.  (Fagaceae),  a  genus  distributed  in  the  southernmost  regions  of  the 
Western  Hemisphere  (34°S  to  Tierra  del  Fuego).  The  material  was  preserved  in 
75  percent  ethanol.  Terminology  used  for  morphology  follows  that  of  Miller 
(1971)  and  Decoursey  and  Esselbaugh  (1962).  Measurements  are  given  in  mil- 
limeters. Illustrations  were  made  with  a  drawing  tube  on  a  Wild  M-stereomicro- 
scope.  Scanning  electron  micrographs  were  made  from  specimens  mounted  on 
stubs,  sputter-coated  with  a  gold  palladium  alloy,  and  studied  with  a  JEOL  T-100 
SEM.  The  studied  material  is  deposited  in  the  Museo  de  Ciencias  Naturales  de 
La  Plata  (Argentina). 


'  Received  on  May  16,  2001.  Accepted  on  March  10.  2004. 

Departamento  Cientifico  de  Entomologia,  Facultad  de  Ciencias  Naturales  y  Museo,  Paseo  del 
Bosque,  1900  La  Plata,  Argentina.  E-mails  of  MCC:  coscaronu/ netverk.com. ar,  mchinchesu/ 
yahoo.com. 

'Facultad  de  C's.  Agrarias,  Universidad  Nacional  del  Comahue,  C.  C.  85  -  8303  Cinco  Saltos,  Rio 
Negro,  Argentina. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


148  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


DESCRIPTIONS 

First  instar  (Fig.  1 ).  Total  length  2.00  (n=  1 ).  Length  of  head  0.47,  width  0.48.  Head  dark  brown 
dorsally,  reddish  posteriorly,  brown  ventrally;  setae  short,  sparced.  Clypeus  and  jugae  dark  brown. 
Clypeus  broadly  surpassing  jugae.  Eyes  prominent,  rounded;  red,  whitish  posteriorly.  Width  of  eye 
0.48,  interocular  space  0.32.  Rostrum  brown,  surpassing  mesocoxae.  Rostral  length  0.88,  ratio  of  seg- 
ment lengths  approximately  1:  1.66:  1.55:  1.66.  Antennae  brown,  yellowish  at  the  base  and  apex  of 
the  articulations;  setose,  abundant  distally.  Antennal  length  0.684,  ratio  of  segment  lengths  approxi- 
mately 1,  1.56:  1.14:  2.14.  Pronotum  dark  brown  with  median  sulcus  pale;  length  0.22,  width  0.53; 
rectangular.  Meso  and  metanotum  dark  brown.  Pale  brown  ventrally.  Legs  pale;  setae  short,  abundant 
on  tarsi  and  tibiae.  Abdominal  length  1.05,  width  0.92.  Abdomen  pale  brown,  dorsally  tinged  with 
red  and  two  large  red  spots  medially;  plates  as  in  Figure  1 .  Pale  brown  ventrally,  tinged  with  red;  last 
segments  with  a  brown  spot  medially. 

Second  instar  (Fig.  2).  Total  length  3.50  (n=  1).  Length  of  head  0.92,  width  1.03.  Head  brown 
dorsally,  pale  brown  medially  and  ventrally;  setae  short,  sparced.  Clypeus  and  jugae  pale  brown.  Eyes 
prominent,  rounded;  red,  whitish  posteriorly.  Width  of  eye  0. 15,  interocular  space  0.73.  Rostrum  pale 
brown,  segment  I  laterally  and  segment  IV  darker;  surpassing  metacoxae.  Rostral  length  2.18,  ratio 
of  segment  lengths  of  ca.  1:1.42:1.34:1.27.  Antennae  brown,  yellowish  at  articulations;  setose,  more 
abundant  distally.  Antenna  1.95  long,  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  1:  2.34:  2.07:  2.40.  Pronotum 
brown,  with  median  sulcus  pale;  length  0.40,  width  1.28;  rectangular,  with  posterior  borders  round- 
ed; setae  sparced.  Wing  pad  length  0.52.  Wing  pad  and  area  between  brown.  Sternum  pale  brown. 
Legs  brown;  setae  short,  abundant  on  tarsi  and  tibiae.  Abdominal  length  1.67,  width  1.52.  Abdomen 
dorsally  pale  brown,  tinged  with  red  and  red  spots;  dorsal  plates  as  in  Figure  2;  pale  brown  ventral- 
ly, external  fringe  reddish;  setae  median,  sparced. 

Third  instar  (Fig.  3).  Total  length  3.70-4.11  (mean  =  3.91)  (n=  10).  Length  of  head  0.83-1.00 
(mean  =  0.92),  width  1.07-1.13  (mean  =  1.09).  Head  brown  dorsally  (in  some  specimens  dark 
brown),  pale  brown  medially,  forming  v-shaped  mark;  pale  brown  ventrally;  with  sparced  and  short 
setae.  Jugae  pale  brown,  darker  laterally.  Clypeus  pale  brown  (in  some  specimens  dark  brown). 
Labrum  dark  brown.  Eyes  prominent,  rounded;  red,  whitish  posteriorly.  Width  of  eye  0. 1 7-0. 1 8 
(mean  =  0.18),  interocular  space  0.73-0.77  (mean  =  0.75).  Rostrum  pale  brown  (in  some  specimens 
dark  brown),  segment  I  laterally  and  distally  and  segment  IV  darker;  reaching  the  metacoxae.  Rostral 
length  1.90-2.07  (mean  =  2.00),  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  1:  1.32:  1.38:  1.20.  Antennae  brown  (in 
some  specimens  dark  brown),  creamy  at  articulations;  segment  IV  fusiform;  setose,  distally  abun- 
dant. Antennal  length  1.62-2.07  (mean  =:  1.90),  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  1:  2.86:  2.32: 
2. 41. Pronotum  brown  (in  some  specimens  dark  brown)  with  median  sulcus  pale;  length  0.40-0.47 
(mean  =  0.44),  width  1.28-1.65  (mean  =  1.42);  rectangular,  with  their  posterior  borders  rounded; 
humeral  angles  projected  laterally  (Fig.  3);  setae  median,  sparced.  Wing  pad  length  0.42-0.60  (mean 
=  0.53);  brown  (in  some  specimens  dark  brown);  setae  median,  sparced.  Sternum  pale  brown,  tinged 
with  red  ventrally.  Legs  pale  brown  to  dark  brown;  setae  short  and  median,  abundant  on  tarsi  and  tib- 
iae. Abdominal  length  1.75-2.23  (mean  =  2.00),  width  1.17-2.53  (mean  =  1.92).  Abdomen  globose; 
dorsally  pale  brown,  tinged  with  red  and  red  spots;  dorsal  plates  as  in  Figure  3.  Pale  brown  ventral- 
ly, fringe  lateral  reddish;  spiracles  present  on  segments  2  to  8  laterally;  setae  median,  sparced. 

Fourth  instar  (Fig.  4).  Total  length  4.11-5.44  (mean  =  4.89)  (n=  8).  Length  of  head  1.00-1.33 
(mean  =  1.18),  width  1.33-1.60  (mean  =  1.49).  Head  brown  dorsally;  laterally,  with  a  dark  spot 
behind  the  eyes;  pale  brown  ventrally;  setae  short,  sparced.  Clypeus  pale  brown,  tinged  with  red, 
whitish  distally.  Juga  pale  brown  tinged  with  red,  dark  brown  laterally.  Labrum  dark  brown.  Eyes  red; 
rounded,  prominent.  Width  of  eye  0.20-0.30  (mean  =  0.26),  interocular  space  0.92-1.05  (mean  = 
0.97).  Rostrum  pale  brown,  darker  at  apex;  reaching  the  metacoxae.  Rostral  length  2.28-3.23  (mean 
=  2.71),  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  1:  1.51:  1.40:  1.21.  Antennae  dark  brown,  yellowish  at  the  artic- 
ulations; setose,  distally  abundant.  Antennal  length  2.42-3.05  (mean  =  2.71),  ratio  of  segment  lengths 
ca.  1:  3.00:  2.37:  2.67.  Pronotum  dark  brown,  median  sulcus  pale;  length  0.63-0.92  (mean  =  0.74), 
width  1.07-2.53  (mean  =  2.16);  punctuate;  anterolateral  angles  projected  laterally;  setae  short, 
sparced.  Meso-  and  metatergum  dark  brown,  median  sulcus  pale;  punctate;  setae  short,  sparced.  Wing 
pad  length  0.92-1.23  (mean  =  1.08);  dark  brown;  punctuate;  setae  median,  sparced.  Ventrally  pale 
brown,  tinged  with  red;  prosternum  with  two  red  spots  antero-laterally.  Legs  pale  brown,  femora  and 
tarsi  darker;  setae  short  and  median,  longer  on  tibiae;  abundant  on  tarsi  and  tibiae.  Mid  tarsi  and  pul- 
villi  and  parempodia  as  seen  in  Figures  6-7  respectively.  Abdominal  length  1 .68-2.53  (mean  =  2.2 1 ), 
width  2.27-3.03  (mean  =  2.57).  Abdomen  red,  tinged  with  pale  brown  dorsally;  medially  with  dark 


Vol.  114.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


149 


v£^x 


Figs.  1-5:    1,  First  instar.  2,  Second  instar.  3,  Third  instar.  4,  Fourth  instar. 
5,  Fifth  instar.  Scale  line:  1  mm. 


plates  arranged  as  in  the  Figure  4;  pale  brown  ventrally,  margin  narrowly  reddish,  with  brown  spots 
on  the  distal  segments;  setae  median,  sparced. 

Fifth  instar  (Fig.  5).  Total  length  6.96  (n=  1).  Length  of  head  1.29,  width  2.00.  Head  brown, 
tinged  with  red  in  the  vertex;  redline  ocelli  present;  outer  posterior  margin  of  eyes  dark  brown;  pale 
brown  ventrally,  with  two  reddish  bands  laterally;  setae  short  and  median,  sparced.  Jugae  laterally 
dark  brown  and  mesially  reddish;  ventrally  with  a  dark  fringe.  Clypeus  reddish,  distally  whitish. 
Labrum  dark  brown;  setae  short.  Eyes  prominent,  rounded;  red,  posteriorly  whitish.  Width  of  eye 
0.18,  interocular  space  0.47.  Rostrum  pale  brown;  segment  I  basally  tinged  with  red;  reaching  the 
metacoxae.  Rostral  length  3.45,  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  1:  1.56:  1.36:  1.12.  Antennae  pale  brown, 
segments  I  and  II  tinged  with  pale  red;  setae  sparced  on  segments  I  and  II,  abundant  and  thinner  on 
segments  III  and  IV.  Antenna  3.67  long,  ratio  of  segment  lengths  ca.  I:  3.50:  2.66:  2.50.  Pronotum 


150 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  6-7.  Scanning  electron  micrographs.  Fourth  instar:  6.  Tarsi  x  150; 
7.  Pretarsi  (pulvillus,  parempodia,  and  claws),  x  350. 


pale  brown,  tinged  with  red;  median  sulcus  pale;  length  1.00,  width  3.48;  punctate;  setae  short  and 
median,  sparced.  Meso-  and  metatergum  pale  brown,  median  sulcus  pale;  punctate;  setae  median. 
Area  between  wing  pad  pale  brown,  tinged  with  red;  punctate.  Ventrally  pale  brown,  tinged  with  red; 
prosternum  with  two  red  spots  antero-laterally.  Wing  pad  length  2.87;  pale  brown,  reddish  laterally, 
mesially  dark  brown;  punctate;  setae  short  and  median,  sparced.  Legs  pale;  pretarsus  dark  brown  dis- 
tally;  setae  short  and  median,  sparced,  abundant  on  tarsi  and  tibiae.  Abdominal  length  2.85,  width 
4.43.  Abdomen  pale  brown,  dorsally  tinged  with  red  and  whitish  areas;  dorsal  and  lateral  plates  dark. 
Ventrally  pale  brown,  with  narrow  reddish  margin,  surrounded  by  whitish  spots;  spiracle  2  to  8  lat- 
eral; setae  long,  sparced. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003  151 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  express  our  gratitude  to  Dr.  Richard  C.  Froeschner  (National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC)  for  reading  the  manuscript.  This  work  was  supported  by 
the  Consejo  Nacional  de  Investigaciones  Cientificas  y  Tecnicas  (CONICET),  National  Geographic 
Grant  N°  7104-01  and  the  Universidad  de  La  Plata,  Argentina. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bequaert,  J.  1935.  Presocial  behavior  among  the  Hemiptera.  Bulletin  of  the  Brooklyn  Entomolog- 
ical Society  30: 177-191. 

Carter,  M.  E.  and  E.  R.  Hoebeke.  2003.  Biology  and  seasonal  history  of  Elasmotethus  atricornis 
(Van  Duzze)  (Hemiptera:  Acanthosomatidae),  with  descriptions  of  the  immature  stages  and  notes 
on  Pendergrast  organs.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  105(3):525-534. 

Decoursey,  R.  M.  and  C.  O.  Esselbaugh.  1962.  Descriptions  of  the  nymphal  stages  of  some  North 
American  Pentatomidae  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of 
America  55:323-341. 

Kumar,  R.  1974.  A  revision  of  world  Acanthosomatidae  (Heteroptera:  Pentatomidae):  keys  to  and 
descriptions  of  subfamilies,  tribes,  and  genera,  with  designation  of  types.  Australian  Journal  of 
Zoology.  Supplemental  Series  N°  34:1-60. 

Miller,  N.  C.  E.  1971.  The  Biology  of  the  Heteroptera.  2nd.  ed.,  rev.  E.W.  Classey,  Limited.  Hamp- 
ton, Middlesex,  England,  xiii  +  206  pp. 

Rolston,  L.  H.  and  R.  Kumar.  1974.  Two  new  genera  and  two  new  species  of  Acanthosomatidae 
(Hemiptera)  from  South  America,  with  a  key  to  the  genera  of  the  Western  Hemisphere.  Journal 
of  the  New  York  Entomological  Society  82:271-278. 

Schuh,  R.  T.  and  J.  A.  Slater.  1995.  True  Bugs  of  the  World  (Hemiptera:  Heteroptera):  Classifi- 
cation and  Natural  History.  Cornell  University  Press.  Ithaca,  New  York,  U.S.A.  i-xii,  pp.  1-337. 


152  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


GYNANDROMORPHISM  IN  POLLINATING  FIG  WASPS 
(HYMENOPTERA:  AGAONIDAE)1 

R.  A.  S.  Pereira,2  A.  P.  Prado,1  and  F.  Kjellberg4 

ABSTRACT:  Gynandromorph  specimens  of  pollinating  fig  wasps  (Hymenoptera:  Agaonidae)  are 
reported  for  the  first  time.  Gynandromorph  individuals  of  Pegoscapus  tonditzi  (pollinator  of  Ficus 
citrifolia  -  Moraceae)  and  Blastophaga  psenes  (pollinator  of  F.  carica)  were  found  in  galls  from 
which  insects  had  not  emerged.  P.  tonditzi  gynandromorph  specimens  showed  female  and  male  tis- 
sues distributed  in  a  mosaic  over  all  parts  of  the  body,  but  with  the  genitalia  predominantly  mascu- 
line, while  in  B.  psenes  the  individuals  had  a  female  front  part  and  a  male  hind  part.  The  presence  of 
gynanadromorphs  at  low  frequencies  in  two  species  suggests  that  they  may  also  occur  in  other  fig 
wasp  species,  but  their  occurrence  is  not  noticed  because  of  their  low  frequency  and  because  it  is  nec- 
essary to  crack  open  the  closed  galls  to  find  these  insects. 

KEY  WORDS:  Agaonidae,  pollinating  fig  wasps,  Hymenoptera,  gynandromorphism. 

Gynandromorphism  is  described  as  the  simultaneous  presence  within  the 
same  organism  of  genotypically  and  phenotypically  male  and  female  tissues 
(Lauge  1985).  Gynandromorph  forms  have  been  described  in  several  orders  of 
arthropods  (Martini  et  al.  1999).  In  Hymenoptera,  this  phenomenon  is  described 
within  some  families,  such  as,  Anthophoridae  (Urban  1999),  Apidae  (Gordh  and 
Gulmahamad  1975),  Chalcididae  (Haltead  1988),  Diprionidae  (Martini  et  al. 
1999),  Formicidae  (Jones  and  Phillips  Jr.  1985),  Halictidae  (Nilsson  1987), 
Scelionidae  (Huggert  1977)  and  others  cited  by  Nilsson  (1987). 

The  origin  of  this  phenomenon  is  not  completely  known,  but  it  is  generally  at- 
tributed to  developmental  anomalies.  Nilsson  (1987)  discusses  some  possible 
causes  of  gynandromorphism  in  haplodiploid  insects  such  as  hymenopterans:  1) 
eggs  that  contain  two  nuclei  and  the  fertilization  of  only  one  of  these  may  pro- 
duce a  gynandromorph;  2)  polyspermy,  by  which  one  sperm  may  fertilize  the  egg 
while  a  nucleus  from  a  supernumerary  sperm  may  give  rise  to  haploid  cells  in  the 
embryo  and  thus  a  gynandromorph;  3)  accidental  meiosis  giving  rise  to  haploid 
cells  in  a  diploid  embryo;  4)  the  opposite  event  giving  rise  to  diploid  cells  from 
haploid  ones  and  5)  accidental  loss  of  sex-determining  loci. 

Feininization  mediated  by  Wolbachia  in  genetically  male  individuals,  although 
not  known  in  Hymenoptera  (Cook  and  Butcher  1999),  deserves  more  studies. 
Feminization  due  to  Wolbachia  infection  is  known  in  Isopoda  (Rigaud  and 
Juchault  1993)  and  was  recently  reported  in  Lepidoptera  (Hiroki  et  al.  2002,  Ka- 
geyama  et  al.  2002).  In  Isopoda,  Wolbachia-mediated  feminization  leads  to  the 
production  of  gynandromorph  phenotypes  (Rigaud  and  Juchault  1993).  In  Dip- 
tera,  Wolbachia  infections  may  be  distributed  throughout  somatic  tissues  (Dobson 


1  Received  on  December  20,  2002.  Accepted  on  January  26,  2004. 

:FFCLRP-USP.  Departamento  de  Biologia,  CEP  14040-901,  Ribeirao  Preto/SP,  Brazil.  E-mail: 
raspereira(a)yahoo.com.br. 

'Unicamp.   Depto.   de   Parasitologia,  CP  6109,  CEP   13083-970,  Campinas/SP,  Brazil.   E-mail: 
apprado(«>unicamp.br. 

4CEFE-CNRS   (Centre   d'Ecologie   Fonctionnelle   et   Evolutive),    Montpellier,    France.    E-mail: 
kjellberg(a>cefe.cnrs_mop.fr. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 


153 


et  al.   1999);  thus,  in  haplodiploid  organisms  like  Hymenoptera,  feminization 
associated  with  infection  of  somatic  tissues  could  produce  a  gynandromorph. 

The  genus  Ficus  (Moraceae)  is  pollinated  by  tiny  species-specific  pollinating 
wasps  belonging  to  the  family  Agaonidae  (Ramirez  1970,  Wiebes  1979,  Herre  et 
al.  1996).  Agaonids  show  a  strong  sexual  dimorphism,  with  winged  females  and 
wingless  pale  brown  males  (Figure  1  A-B).  Sex-determination  is  haplodiploid, 
males  developing  from  unfertilized  eggs  and  females  from  fertilized  ones  (Cook 
1993). 


B 


Figure  1.  Pegoscapus  tonditii  pollinator  of  Ficus  citri folia.  Normal  female  and  male:  A- 
B.  Gynandromorph  individuals:  C  -  specimen  1  (dorsal),  D  -  specimen  2  (dorsal),  E-F  - 
specimen  3  (laterals),  ft  =  female  tissue,  mt  =  male  tissue,  w  =  wing.  B-F  at  the  same  scale. 
Scales  =  1mm. 


154  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Among  non-pollinating  fig  wasps,  gynandromorphism  was  described  in  the 
genus  Psenobolus  (Ichneumonoidea,  Braconidae)  (Ramirez  and  Marsh  1996) 
and  the  gynandromorph  specimen  helped  to  associate  female  and  male  forms 
classified  before  as  different  species  due  to  the  accentuated  sexual  dimorphism. 
However,  this  phenomenon  is  not  described  in  the  literature  for  fig  wasp  species 
belonging  to  the  superfamily  Chalcidoidea  that  includes  pollinating  fig  wasps. 

Six  gynandromorph  specimens  of  the  pollinating  species,  Pegoscapus  tonduzi, 
were  found  in  crops  of  two  trees  of  Ficus  citri folia  sampled  during  August  2001 
in  the  surroundings  of  the  Campinas  State  University  campus,  Brazil  (22°  54'S, 
47°  03'W).  Twenty-five  syconia  of  each  tree  were  sampled  near  the  wasp  emer- 
gence phase  before  any  wasps  had  left  the  fruit.  Each  syconium  was  placed  indi- 
vidually in  a  plastic  flask,  and  all  the  wasps  were  allowed  to  emerge  before  being 
frozen.  The  gynandromorph  individuals  were  found  in  galls  from  which  insects 
had  not  emerged,  suggesting  these  insects  had  some  viability  problems.  Gynan- 
dromorph specimens  showed  female  and  male  tissues  distributed  in  a  mosaic 
over  all  parts  of  the  body,  but  with  genitalia  predominantly  masculine  (Figure  1 
C-F).  The  external  morphology  presented  female  or  male  traits  according  to  the 
predominance  of  female  or  male  tissues  respectively,  including  the  development 
of  wings  in  these  thorax  parts  with  female  tissues  (Figure  1  F). 

This  phenomenon  seems  to  be  rare,  since  only  six  gynandromorph  individuals 
were  observed  in  approximately  600  syconia  or  14,000  males  assessed  during  the 
five-year  study.  Another  interesting  point  is  that  all  the  gynandromorph  individ- 
uals were  found  in  two  samples  at  the  same  period  of  the  year,  suggesting  per- 
haps an  environmental  factor,  such  as  low  temperatures,  could  cause  develop- 
mental interferences  in  these  insects.  Gynandromoiphism  was  also  observed, 
though  in  a  slightly  different  form  in  Blastophaga  psenes,  the  wasp  pollinating 
F.  carica.  In  1984,  four  gynandromorphic  individuals  were  observed  in  a  sample 
of  127  syconia  containing  3,312  males.  They  were  all  in  non-exited  galls,  sug- 
gesting again  a  lack  of  viability.  In  B.  psenes,  the  individuals  had  a  female  front 
part  and  a  male  hind  part.  Three  were  found  on  one  tree  within  the  same  crop  that 
matured  in  May  (two  in  the  same  syconium),  while  the  fourth  was  observed  on 
another  tree  in  a  crop  that  matured  in  July.  No  gynandromorphic  male  was 
observed  in  other  years  of  sampling. 

The  presence  of  gynanadromorphs  at  low  frequencies  in  two  species  suggests 
that  they  may  occur  in  other  fig  wasp  species,  but  their  occurrences  is  not  noticed 
because  of  their  low  frequency  and  because  it  is  necessary  to  crack  open  the 
closed  galls  to  find  these  insects.  More  studies  will  be  necessary  to  elucidate  the 
factors  that  lead  to  the  development  of  gynandromorph  fig  wasp  individuals. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  J.  Cook,  S.  A.  West,  and  two  anonymous  referees  for  the  critical  review  of  the  manu- 
script. R.  A.  S.  Pereira  was  supported  by  Fapesp  (studentship  no:  98/05067-4). 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003  155 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Cook,  J.  M.  1993.  Sex  determination  in  the  Hymenoptera:  a  review  of  models  and  evidence.  Here- 
dity 71:421-435. 

Cook,  J.  M.  and  R.  D.  J.  Butcher  1 999.  The  transmission  and  effects  of  Wolbachia  bacteria  in  par- 
asitoids.  Researches  on  Population  Ecology  41:15-28. 

Dobson,  S.  L.,  K.  Bourtzis,  H.  R.  Braig,  B.  F.  Jones,  W.  G.  Zhou,  F.  Rousset,  and  S.  L.  O'Neill. 

1999.   Wolbachia  infections  are  distributed  throughout  insect  somatic  and  germ  line  tissues. 
Insect  Biochemistry  and  Molecular  Biology  29:153-160. 

Gordh,  G.  and  H.  Gulmahamad.  1975.  A  bilateral  gynadromorphic  Xylocopa  taken  in  California 
(Hymenoptera:  Apidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  77:269-273. 

Haltead,  J.  A.  1988.  A  gynandromorph  of  Hockeria  rubra  (Ashmead)(Hymenoptera:  Chalcididae). 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  90:258-259. 

Herre,  E.  A.,  C.  A.  Machado,  E.  Bermingham,  J.  D.  Nason,  D.  M.  Windsor,  S.  S.  McCafferty, 
W.  Van-Houten,  and  K.  Bachmann.  1996.  Molecular  phytogenies  of  figs  and  their  pollinator 
wasps.  Journal  of  Biogeography  23:521-530. 

Hiroki,  M.,  Y.  Kato,  T.  Kamito,  and  K.  Miura.  2002.  Feminization  of  genetic  males  by  a  symbi- 
otic bacterium  in  a  butterfly,  Eurema  hecabe  (Lepidoptera:  Pieridae).  Naturwissenschaften 
89:167-170. 

Huggert,  L.  1977.  Three  gynandromorphic  specimens  of  Idris piceiventris  (Kieffer)  (Hymenoptera, 
Proctotrupoidea:  Scelionidae).  Entomologica  Scandinavica  8:158-160. 

Jones,  S.  R.  and  S.  A.  Phillips  Jr.  1985.  Gynandromorphism  in  the  ant  Pheidole  dentata  Mayr  (Hy- 
menoptera: Formicidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  87:  583-586. 

Kageyama,  D.,  G.  Nishimura,  S.  Hoshizaki,  and  Y.  Ishikawa.  2002.  Feminizing  Wolbachia  in  an 
insect,  Ostrinia furnacalis  (Lepidoptera  :  Crambidae).  Heredity  88:444-449. 

Lauge,  G.  1 985.  Sex  determination:  Genetic  and  epigenetic  factors.  In,  Comprehensive  insect  phys- 
iology biochemistry  and  pharmacology,  vol.  1.  Embryogenesis  and  reproduction.  G.  A.  Kerkut 
and  L.  L.  Gilbert  (Editors).  Pergamon  Press,  Oxford,  England.  487  pp. 

Martini,  A.,  N.  Baldassari,  and  P.  Baronio.  1999.  Gynandromorphism  and  its  manifestations  in 
Diprionid  Hymenoptera.  Bollettino  dell'Istituto  di  Entomologia  "Guido  Grandi."  dell'Universita 
di  Bologna  53:87-107. 

Nilsson,  G.  E.  1987.  A  gynandromorphic  specimen  of  Evylaeus  albipes  (Fabricius)(Hymenoptera, 
Halictidae)  and  a  discussion  of  possible  causes  of  gynandromorphism  in  haplo-diploids  insects. 
Notulae  Entomologicae  67:157-162. 

Ramirez  B.  W.   1970.  Host  specificity  of  fig  wasps  (Agaonidae).  Evolution  24:680-691. 

Ramirez  B.  VV.  and  P.  M.  Marsh.  1996.  A  review  of  the  genus  Psenobolus  (Hymenoptera:  Bra- 
conidae)  from  Costa  Rica,  an  inquiline  fig  wasp  with  brachypterous  males,  with  descriptions  of 
two  new  species.  Journal  of  Hymenoptera  Research  5:64-72. 

Rigaud,  T.  and  P.  Juchault.  1993.  Conflict  between  feminizing  sex-ratio  distorters  and  an  autoso- 
mal  masculinizing  gene  in  the  terrestrial  isopod  Armadillidium  vulgare  latr.  Genetics  133:247- 
252. 

Urban,  D.  1999.  Ginandromorfia  em  Alloscirtetica  brethesi  (Joergensen)  (Hymenoptera,  Antho- 
phoridae).  Revista  Brasileira  de  Zoologia  16:  171-173. 

Wiebes,  J.  T.  1979.  Co-evolution  of  figs  and  their  insect  pollinators.  Annual  Review  of  Ecology  and 
Systematics  10:1-12. 


156  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  ATRICHOPOGON  KIEFFER  FROM 

NORTHERN  ARGENTINA 
(DIPTERA:  CERATOPOGONIDAE)1 

Pablo  I.  Marino2  and  Gustavo  R.  Spinellr 

ABSTRACT:  Atrichopogon  carpintemi,  n.  sp.  from  the  Argentinian  province  of  Formosa  is  de- 
scribed and  illustrated  from  male  and  female  specimens  collected  with  a  light  trap.  The  species,  eas- 
ily recognized  by  the  contrasting  coloration  between  the  thorax  and  abdomen,  lacks  secondary  sexu- 
al dimorphism.  It  is  compared  with  the  congeners,  A.  utricularis  Macfie  and  A.  homofacies  Spinelli. 

KEY  WORDS:  Atrichopogon,  new  species,  Diptera,  Ceratopogonidae,  northern  Argentina 

Atrichopogon  Kieffer,  a  worldwide  genus,  is  one  of  the  most  speciose  in  the 
family  Ceratopogonidae,  only  surpassed  in  the  Neotropics  by  Culicoides 
Latreille  and  Forcipomyia  Meigen.  Borkent  and  Spinelli  (2000),  in  their  catalog 
of  the  New  World  ceratopogonids  south  of  the  United  States  of  America,  listed 
75  species  for  the  region,  and  there  has  been  only  one  species  subsequently 
described,  Atrichopogon  mexicanus  Huerta  (2001).  Of  these  species,  the  follow- 
ing eleven  are  known  to  occur  in  Argentina:  A.  albinensis  Ingram  and  Macfie,  A. 
balseiroi  Spinelli,  A.  casali  Cavalieri  and  Chiossone,  A.  delpontei  Cavalieri  and 
Chiossone,  A.  domizii  Spinelli,  A.  homofacies  Spinelli,  A.  mendozae  Ingram  and 
Macfie,  A.  obfuscatus  Ingram  and  Macfie,  A.  obnubilus  Ingram  and  Macfie,  A. 
seudoobfuscatus  Spinelli  and  A  talarum  Spinelli  (Spinelli,  1998). 

The  feeding  habits  of  the  female  adults  are  poorly  known.  Some  suck 
haemolymph  from  blister  beetles  (Wirth,  1956a,  b),  while  others  are  pollinivo- 
rous  or  appear  to  be  autogenous.  Larvae  are  aquatic  or  semiaquatic  and  are  found 
on  the  surface  of  mud,  wet  wood,  or  stones,  feeding  on  diatoms  and  other  algae 
(de  Meillon  and  Wirth,  1991). 

Species  of  Atrichopogon  form  a  fairly  uniform  group  as  far  as  their  adult  mor- 
phology is  concerned  (Debenham,  1973),  and  very  similar  species  can  be  recog- 
nized as  adults  only  by  the  male  genitalic  characters.  However,  pigmentation  pat- 
terns appear  to  be  very  important  in  the  recognition  of  many  species  in  Costa 
Rica  (Borkent,  pers.  comm.). 

Through  the  courtesy  of  Jorge  Williams  from  the  Museo  de  La  Plata,  Argen- 
tina, we  obtained  specimens  of  a  very  distinctive  species  of  Atrichopogon  col- 
lected with  a  light  trap  in  the  Argentinian  province  of  Formosa,  which  is  here 
described  as  a  new  species. 

METHODS 

Specimens  were  slide  mounted  in  Canada  balsam  and  examined,  measured 


'  Received  on  January  6,  2004.  Accepted  on  February  3,  2004. 

2  Division  Entomologia,  Museo  de  la  Plata,  Paseo  del  Bosque  s/n,  1900  La  Plata,  Argentina.  E-mails: 
pabloaguara(fl)yahoo.com.ar  and  spinelli^lmuseo.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar,  respectively. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 157 

and  drawn  using  a  binocular  compound  microscope  with  attached  camera  lucida. 
Types  of  the  new  species  are  deposited  in  the  collection  of  the  Division  of 
Entomology,  Museo  de  la  Plata,  Argentina  (MLPA). 

Terms  for  structures  follow  those  used  in  the  Manual  of  Nearctic  Diptera 
(McAlpine  et  al.,  1981),  and  for  special  terms  applying  to  Atrichopogon  see 
Wirth  (1994).  Terms  for  wing  veins  follow  the  system  of  the  Manual  of  Nearctic 
Diptera,  with  modifications  proposed  by  Szadziewski  (1996). 

Atrichopogon  carpinteroi,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-9) 

Diagnosis.  A  medium-size  species  of  Atrichopogon  with  no  secondary  sexu- 
al dimorphism;  eight  proximal  flagellomeres  whitish,  distal  five  dark  brown;  tho- 
rax with  scutum,  scutellum,  postscutellum,  paratergite,  propleuron  and  anepi- 
sternum  dark  brown,  rest  of  pleura  and  legs  pale  yellowish;  abdomen  pale  yel- 
lowish, segment  8-10  of  female  slightly  darker;  spermatheca  large,  ovoid  with 
short  neck,  lightly  sclerotized;  parameres  apparently  missing;  aedeagus  triangu- 
lar, tapering  to  cap-like  apex,  basal  arch  very  low. 

Description  of  male.  Head.  Vertex,  frons  dark  brown;  clypeus  brown;  proboscis  pale.  Ommatidia 
with  interfacet  spicules,  narrowly  abutting  medially.  Antenna  (Fig.  1)  with  flagellomeres  1-8  whitish, 
bottle-shaped,  flagellomeres  9-13  elongated,  dark  brown,  proportions  as  shown  in  Fig.  1,  flagello- 
mere  13  with  basally  constricted  nipple;  flagellomeres  with  sensillae  chaetica  and  trichodea,  without 
plume  setae  (Fig.  2);  AR  1.20.  Maxillary  palpus  (Fig.  3)  pale,  darkish  at  apex;  third  segment  slender, 
with  shallow  sensory  pit  near  midlength;  segments  4,  5  closely  appressed;  segment  5  conical-shaped; 
PR  3.00.  Proboscis  short,  length  0.240  mm;  P/H  ratio  1.07. 

Thorax.  Scutum,  scutellum,  postscutellum,  paratergite,  propleuron,  anepistemum  dark  brown;  rest 
of  pleura  pale  yellowish;  scutum  with  all  setae  in  dark  pits;  with  lateral  suture.  Paratergite  with  one 
stout  seta.  Legs  uniformly  yellowish;  hindtibial  spur  short,  hindtibial  comb  with  7  spines;  prothoracic 
TR  2.91,  mesothoracic  TR  3.08,  metathoracic  TR  2.28;  claws  (Fig.  4)  curved,  moderately  stout,  bifid 
at  tip;  empodia  present.  Wing  (Fig.  5)  plain,  without  pattern  of  pigmented  membrane;  with  few 
macrotrichiae  in  cell  r3,  one  or  two  in  cell  ml;  first  radial  cell  reduced,  second  radial  cell  well 
formed,  long,  narrow;  cubital  fork  proximal  to  level  of  costal  apex;  wing  length  0.98  mm;  breadth 
0.36  mm;  CR  0.69.  Halter  whitish. 

Abdomen.  Tergites  uniformly  pale  yellowish.  Sternites  more  or  less  similarly  rectangularly 
shaped.  Genitalia  (Fig.  6):  Segment  9  with  tergite  moderately  elongate,  extending  to  level  of  apex  of 
gonocoxite;  sternite  9  narrow,  with  single  row  of  setae.  Gonocoxite  pale  yellowish,  moderately  stout, 
1.6  times  longer  than  greatest  breadth;  gonostylus  0.75  as  long  as  gonocoxite,  slender,  nearly  straight, 
tip  pointed.  Parameres  apparently  missing.  Aedeagus  triangular,  stout,  lightly  sclerotized,  tapering  to 
cap-like  tip  (Fig.  7);  basal  arms  short,  recurved;  basal  arch  very  low,  extending  to  1/10  of  total  length. 
Cercus  small,  lobe-like,  not  projecting  beyond  apex  of  tergite  9. 

Female.  As  for  male,  only  with  genital  differences;  AR  1.27  (1.26-1.28,  n  =  2);  PR  2.95  (2.90- 
3.00,  n  =  2);  proboscis  length  0.30  mm;  P/H  ratio  1.33  (1.25-1.41,  n  =  2);  wing  length  1.14  ( 1.1 3- 
1.14,  n  =  2)  mm;  breadth  0.44  (0.43-0.46,  n  =  2)  mm;  CR  0.70  (0.69-0.71,  n  =  2);  prothoracic  TR 
2.96  (2.92-3.00,  n  =  2),  mesothoracic  TR  3.21  (3.17-3.25,  n  =  2),  metathoracic  TR  2.43  (2.35-2.50, 
n  =  2).  Tergites  1-7  pale  yellowish,  8-10  slightly  darker.  Spennatheca  large,  ovoid  with  short  neck, 
lightly  sclerotized,  measuring  0.240  by  0.152  mm  (Fig.  8).  Sternite  8  without  elongate,  curved  setae. 
Segments  8-10  as  shown  in  Fig.  9.  Cercus  pale. 

Distribution.  Atrichopogon  carpinteroi  n.  sp.  is  known  only  from  the  type  locality. 

Material  Examined.  Holotype  male,  allotype  female,  Argentina,  Formosa  prov.,  Estancia  La 
Marcela,  35  km  E  El  Colorado,  27/28-VII-2003,  J.  Williams,  light  trap  (MLPA);  paratype  female, 
same  data. 


158 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  1-9.  Atrichopogon  carpinteroi,  n.  sp.  1-7.  male;  8-9.  female.  1.  flagellum;  2.  fla- 
gellomeres  8-9;  3.  palpus;  4.  tarsal  claws;  5.  wing;  6.  genitalia;  7.  tip  of  aedeagus; 
8.  spermatheca;  9.  abdominal  segments  8-10.  Scale  bars  =  0.05  mm. 


Taxonomic  Discussion.  Males  and  females  were  associated  by  their  similar 
pigmentation  pattern  and  were  collected  at  the  same  locality  and  date.  The 
female  of  this  new  species  resembles  the  female  of  A  utricularis  Macfie  from 
Costa  Rica  by  virtue  of  the  large,  ovoid,  lightly  sclerotized  spermatheca  with  nar- 
row duct  and  by  the  few  macrotrichia  at  the  wing  tip,  but  differs  by  having  bifid 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 159 

tarsal  claws  (simple  in  utricularis}  and  by  several  differences  in  pigmentation 
patterns,  e.g.,  proximal  eight  flagellomeres  pale  (flagellum  nearly  entirely  dark 
brown  in  utricularis),  abdomen  pale  yellowish  (very  dark  brown  in  utricularis} 
and  legs  pale  yellowish  (yellowish  brown  in  utricularis}. 

Atrichopogon  homofacies  Spinelli  from  Argentina  and  A.  carpinteroi  both 
lack  secondary  sexual  differences.  However,  the  abdomen  of  A.  homofacies  is 
pale  brown,  so  that  the  pigmentation  of  thorax  and  abdomen  does  not  contrast, 
the  flagellum  is  entirely  dark  brown  and  only  the  last  three  flagellomeres  of  male 
flagellum  are  elongated.  In  addition,  A.  homofacies  differs  in  the  following  gen- 
ital characters:  Y-shaped  female  genital  sclerotization;  parameres  present,  fused, 
and  with  a  blunt  tip;  aedeagus  Y-shaped  with  higher  basal  arch  and  deeply  pig- 
mented,  stout,  pilose  gonostylus. 

Etymology.  The  species  is  named  after  Diego  L.  Carpintero  from  the  Museo 
de  La  Plata,  in  recognition  of  his  excellent  work  recognizing  ceratopogonids  in 
alcohol  preserved  light  traps  samples. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  would  like  to  acknowledge  Jorge  Williams  for  his  valuable  help  collecting  insects  using  light 
traps  in  several  places  of  Argentina. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Km  ki  MI.  A.  and  G.  R.  Spinelli.  2000.  Catalog  of  the  new  World  biting  midges  south  of  the  United 
States  of  America  (Diptera:  Ceratopogonidae).  Contributions  on  Entomology,  International  4:1- 
107. 

Debenham,  M.  L.  1973.  Four  New  Guinea  and  northern  Queensland  species  of  Atrichopogon 
Kieffer  (Diptera:  Ceratopogonidae)  with  atypical  development  of  the  thoracic  setae.  Journal  of 
the  Australian  Entomological  Society  12:68-77. 

de  Meillon,  B.  and  W.  W.  Wirth.  1991.  The  genera  and  subgenera  (excluding  Culicoides)  of  the 
Afrotropical  biting  midges  (Diptera:  Ceratopogonidae).  Annals  of  the  Natal  Museum  32:27-147. 

Huerta,  H.  2001.  A  new  species  of  the  genus  Atrichopogon  Kieffer  (Diptera:  Ceratopogonidae) 
from  Mexico.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  103:  373-375. 

McAlpine,  J  .  F.,  B.  V.  Peterson,  G.  E.  Shewell,  H.  J.  Teskey,  J.  R.  Vockeroth,  and  D.  M.  Wood 

(eds.).    1981.  Manual  of  Nearctic  Diptera.  Volume  1 .  Agriculture  Canada  Monograph  27.  674  pp 

Szadziewski,  R.  1996.  Biting  midges  from  Lower  Cretaceous  amber  of  Lebanon  and  Upper 
Cretaceous  Siberian  amber  of  Taimyr  (Diptera,  Ceratopogonidae).  Studia  Dipterologica  3:23-86. 

Spinelli,  G.  R.  1998.  Ceratopogonidae,  pp.  314-326.  //;  J.J.  Morrone  and  S.  Coscaron  (dirs.), 
Biodiversidad  de  artropodos  Argentines.  Una  perspective  biotaxonomica.  Ediciones  Sur.  La 
Plata,  Argentina.  599  pp. 

Wirth,  W.  W.  1956a.  The  biting  midges  ectoparasitic  on  blister  beetles  (Diptera:  Heleidae). 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  58:15-23. 

Wirth,  W.  W.  1956b.  The  heleid  midges  involved  in  the  pollination  of  rubber  trees  in  America 
(Diptera:  Heleidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  58:241-250. 

Wirth,  W.  W.  1994.  The  subgenus  Atrichopogon  (Lophomyidium)  with  a  revision  of  the  Nearctic 
species  (Diptera:  Ceratopogonidae).  Insecta  Mundi  8:17-36. 


160  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


CONFIRMATION  OF  PROSTOIA  COMPLETA  AND 

SHIPSA  ROTUNDA  (PLECOPTERA:  NEMOURIDAE) 

IN  MISSISSIPPI,  U.S.A.1 

Bill  P.  Stark2  and  Matthew  B.  Hicks3 

ABSTRACT:  Prostoia  complete!  (Walker),  previously  reported  from  Mississippi  but  without  specif- 
ic locality  data,  is  confirmed  from  several  sites  recently  discovered  by  personnel  of  the  Mississippi 
Department  of  Environmental  Quality,  Biological  Services  Section,  in  the  northern  part  of  the  state, 
and  Ship.sa  rotunda  (Claassen)  is  reported  in  the  state  for  the  first  time.  An  updated  checklist  of  55 
species  now  reported  from  the  state  is  given. 

KEY  WORDS:  Prostoia  completa,  Shipsa  rotunda,  Plecoptera,  Nemouridae,  Mississippi,  U.S.A. 

Stark  (1980)  recorded  only  three  nemourids  from  Mississippi  with  Amphine- 
mura  nigritta  (Provancher)  the  only  relatively  common  species.  Prostoia  com- 
pleta (Walker)  was  included  on  the  basis  of  a  Ricker  (1952)  record  which  did  not 
give  a  specific  locality,  and  A.  delosa  (Ricker)  on  the  basis  of  a  single  female 
specimen  in  the  Bryant  Mather  collection.  Subsequently,  collections  of  A.  nigrit- 
ta have  been  made  from  a  few  sites  but  no  new  records  of  other  nemourid  species 
were  available  until  a  recent  winter  sampling  program  by  the  Mississippi  De- 
partment of  Environmental  Quality  (MDEQ)  produced  nymphs  determined  as 
Prostoia  from  several  localities.  The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  confirm  the 
presence  of  P.  completa  in  the  state  by  collecting  adult  specimens  at  the  MDEQ 
sites.  While  collecting  these  specimens  we  were  surprised  to  find  an  additional 
nemourid  species,  Shipsa  rotunda  (Claassen),  at  one  site.  Specimens  are  deposit- 
ed in  the  B.  P.  Stark  collection  (BPS),  Mississippi  College,  Clinton,  Mississippi, 
or  in  the  Mississippi  Department  of  Environmental  Quality,  Biological  Services 
Section  (MDEQ),  Pearl,  Mississippi,  as  indicated  in  the  species  accounts. 

Prostoia  completa  (Walker) 
Nemoura  completa  Walker,  1852.  Holotype  Cf,  Nova  Scotia,  British  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Stark  (2001)  lists  this  species  from  22  states  and  Canadian  provinces  in  the 
general  region  from  Nova  Scotia  to  Minnesota,  south  to  Oklahoma  and  Missis- 
sippi, and  east  to  the  Carolinas.  Specific  records  exist  for  Alabama  (James  1972; 
Stark  and  Harris  1986)  and  Arkansas  (Poulton  and  Stewart  1991),  but  the  species 
has  not  yet  been  reported  in  Tennessee  although  B.  C.  Kondratieff  has  records 
from  several  counties  (Kondratieff  pers.  com.).  Ricker's  (1952)  specimen,  a  male 
(C.  Favret,  pers.  com.),  is  listed  in  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey  data  base 
from  Potts  Camp  [Marshall  County],  Mississippi,  collected  February  17,  1941. 


1  Received  on  March  26,  2003.  Accepted  on  February  9,  2004. 

:  Dept.  of  Biology,  Box  4045,  Mississippi  College,  Clinton,  MS  39058,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  stark@mc.edu. 

'The  Nature  Conservancy  of  Mississippi,  6400  takeover  Road,  Jackson,  MS  39213,  U.S.A.  E-mail: 
mhicks@tnc.org. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 161 

We  presume  this  specimen  was  collected  from  Oaklimeter  Creek,  which  flows 
through  Potts  Camp,  although  we  collected  only  Taeniopteryx  specimens  at  this 

site. 

Material  Examined.  Mississippi:  Alcorn  County,  Bearman  Creek,  CR  771  near  Lone  Pine,  28 
February  2002,  4  nymphs  (MDEQ).  Alcorn  Co.,  Hatchie  River,  CR  755  near  Lone  Pine,  28  February' 
2002,  3  nymphs  (MDEQ).  Lee  County,  Twenty  Mile  Creek,  21  February  2001,  1  nymph  (MDEQ). 
Marshall  County,  Big  Spring  Creek,  Potts  Camp  Road,  1 5  February  2003,  B.  Stark,  M.  Hicks,  5  Cf , 
5  9,  12  nymphs  (BPS).  Same  site,  16  January  2001,  13  nymphs  (MDEQ).  Marshall  County,  Little 
Spring  Creek,  Wilkins  Church  Road,  15  February  2003,  B.  Stark,  M.  Hicks,  1  nymph  (BPS). 

Shipsa  rotunda  (Claassen) 
Nemoura  rotunda  Claassen,  1923.  Holotype  Cf,  Waldeboro,  Maine,  Cornell  University. 

Stark  (2001)  lists  this  species  from  18  states  and  Canadian  provinces  in  the 
general  region  from  New  Brunswick  to  Alaska,  south  to  Arkansas  and  South 
Carolina.  The  species  is  reported  from  Arkansas  by  Poulton  and  Stewart  (1991) 
and  Alabama  (James  1972;  Stark  and  Harris  1986),  but  not  Tennessee.  The  rec- 
ord given  below  is  from  a  creek  somewhat  smaller  than  the  typical  habitat  for  this 

species. 

Material  Examined.  Mississippi:  Marshall  County,  Big  Spring  Creek,  Potts  Camp  Road.  15 
February  2003,  B.  Stark,  M.  Hicks,  1  Cf,  2  9,  2  nymphs  (BPS). 

Systematic  List  of  Mississippi  Plecoptera 

SYSTELLOGNATHA 

Family  Chloroperlidae 

Alloperla  natchez  Surdick  &  Stark 
Haploperla  brevis  (Banks) 
Haploperla  chukcho  (Surdick  &  Stark) 

Family  Perlidae 

Acroneuria  abnormis  (Newman) 
Acroneuria  arenosa  (Pictet) 
Acroneuria  carolinensis  (Banks) 
Acroneuria  evoluta  Prison 
Agnetina  annulipes  (Hagen) 
Attaneuria  ruralis  (Hagen) 
Eccoptura  xanthenes  (Newman) 
Neoperla  carlsoni  Stark  &  Baumann 
Neoperla  clymene  (Newman) 
Neoperla  coxi  Stark 
Neoperla  occipitalis  (Pictet) 
Neoperla  robisoni  Poulton  &  Stewart 
Neoperla  stewarti  Stark  &  Baumann 
Paragnetina  fumosa  ( Banks ) 
Paragnetina  kansensis  (Banks) 


162  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Perlesta  lagoi  Stark 

Perlesta  placida  (Hagen) 

Perlesta  shubuta  Stark 

Perlinella  drymo  (Newman) 

Perlinella  ephyre  (Newman) 

Perlinella  zwicki  Kondratieff,  Kirchner  &  Stewart 

Family  Perlodidae 

Clioperla  clio  (Newman) 
Diploperla  duplicata  (Banks) 
Helopicus  bogaloosa  Stark  &  Ray 
Isogenoides  varians  (Walsh) 
Isoperla  bilineata  (Say) 
hoperla  coushatta  Szczytko  &  Stewart 
Isoperla  dicala  Prison 

Family  Pteronarcyidae 

Pteronarcys  dorsata  (Say) 

EUHOLOGNATHA 

Family  Capniidae 

Allocapnia  aurora  Ricker 
Allocapnia  granulata  (Claassen) 
Allocapnia  mystica  Prison 
Allocapnia  polemistis  Ross  &  Ricker 
Allocapnia  recta  (Claassen) 
Allocapnia  rickeri  Prison 
Allocapnia  starki  Kondratieff  &  Kirchner 
Allocapnia  virginiana  Prison 
Nemocapnia  Carolina  Banks 

Family  Leuctridae 

Leuctra  cottaquilla  James 
Leuctra  ferruginea  (Walker) 
Leuctra  rickeri  James 
Leuctra  tenella  Provancher 

Family  Nemouridae 

Amphinemura  delosa  (Ricker) 
Amphinemura  nigritta  (Provancher) 
Prostoia  completa  (Walker) 
Shipsa  rotunda  (Claassen) 

Family  Taeniopterygidae 

Strophopteryx  fasciata  ( Burmeister) 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 163 

Taeniopteryx  burksi  Ricker  &  Ross 
Taeniopteryx  lita  Prison 
Taeniopteryx  lonicera  Ricker  &  Ross 
Taeniopteryx  maura  (Pictet) 
Taeniopteryx  parvula  Banks 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  Mike  Beiser  of  the  Mississippi  Department  of  Environmental  Quality,  Bio- 
logical Services  Section  for  the  loan  of  specimens  and  to  Colin  Favret,  Illinois  Natural  History  Sur- 
vey, for  providing  information  on  the  specimen  listed  in  Ricker  (1952).  We  also  thank  B.  C.  Kon- 
dratieff  and  M.  Beiser  for  a  prepublication  review. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Claassen,  P.  W.   1923.  New  species  of  North  American  Plecoptera.  Canadian  Entomologist  55:257- 
263;  281-292. 

James,  A.  M.   1972.  The  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Alabama.  Unpublished  Ph.D.  Dissertation. 
Auburn  University  (Alabama).  161  pp. 

Poulton,  B.  C.  and  K.  W.  Stewart.   1991.  The  stoneflies  of  the  Ozark  and  Ouachita  Mountains 
(Plecoptera).  Memoirs  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  38:1-116. 

Ricker,  W.  E.    1952.  Systematic  studies  in  Plecoptera.  Indiana  University  Publications  Science 
Series  18: 1-200. 

Stark,  B.  P.   1980.  The  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Mississippi.  Journal  of  the  Mississippi  Academy 
of  Sciences  24: 109- 122. 

Stark,  B.  P.  2001.  North  American  stonefly  list,  updated  as  of  February  16,  2001. 
http://www.mc.edu/Campus/users/stark/sfly0102.htm. 

Stark,  B.  P.  and  S.  C.  Harris.   1986.  Records  of  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  in  Alabama.  Entomological 

News  97: 177- 182. 

Walker,  F.   1852.  Catalogue  of  the  specimens  of  neuropterous  insects  in  the  collection  of  the  British 
Museum.  Part  I.  192  pp. 


164  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


FIVE  NEW  SPECIES  OF  NEOTRICHIA 

(TRICHOPTERA:  HYDROPTILIDAE:  NEOTRICHIINI) 

FROM  SOUTHERN  MEXICO  AND  NORTHERN  BELIZE1 

Andrew  C.  Keth2 

ABSTRACT:  Five  new  species  of  microcaddisflies  of  the  genus  Neotrichia,  Neotrichia  amplector. 
from  southern  Mexico,  and  Neotrichia  amplio,  Neotrichia  garra,  Neotrichia  mathisi,  and  Neotrichia 
pulgara,  from  northern  Belize  are  described  and  illustrated.  New  figures  of  Neotrichia  ersitis, 
Neotrichia  okopa,  Neotrichia  aequispina,  Neotrichia  rasmusseni,  and  Neotrichia  maria  are  included 
for  comparison. 

KEY  WORDS:  Neotrichia,  Trichoptera,  Hydroptilidae,  Neotrichiini,  southern  Mexico,  northern  Be- 
lize, new  species. 

The  genus  Neotrichia  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae)  is  one  of  the  most  speciose 
groups  of  microcaddisflies  (Flint  et  al  1999).  Neotrichia  species  have  been  col- 
lected over  the  whole  of  North  America,  from  as  far  north  as  Saskatchewan  and 
Maine,  southeast  to  Florida,  and  west  to  Oregon  and  California  (Wiggins  1998). 
The  distribution  includes  Mexico,  Central  and  South  America,  and  representative 
species  can  be  found  in  Cuba  and  nearly  all  the  islands  of  the  Caribbean  (Harris 
1990;  Flint  et  al.  1999).  Of  the  121  nominal  species  of  Neotrichia,  101  occur 
only  in  the  Neotropics  (Harris  1991;  Frazerand  Harris  1991;  Morse  1993;  Morse 
1997;  Flint  et  al.  1999;  Keth  2002). 

An  ongoing  study  of  Neotrichia  systematics  has  led  to  the  discovery  of  sever- 
al new  species.  In  this  paper  I  describe  one  new  Neotrichia  species  from  south- 
ern Mexico  and  four  new  species  from  northern  Belize.  Descriptive  terminology 
follows  that  of  Marshall  (1979)  and  Keth  (2002).  Type  material  will  be  deposit- 
ed at  The  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution 
(NMNH),  Washington,  D.C.,  USA  and  at  The  Frost  Entomological  Museum,  The 
Pennsylvania  State  University  (PSU),  University  Park,  Pennsylvania,  USA. 


Neotrichia  amplector  Keth,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  1) 

Diagnosis.  Neotrichia  amplector  is  most  similar  to  N.  ersitis  Denning  (Fig.  2), 
both  having  short  triangular  inferior  appendages  with  robust  serrations  along  the 
mesal  margins.  Both  N.  amplector  and  N.  ersitis  also  have  ornate  sclerotized 
ridges  at  the  apex  of  the  subgenital  plate.  Neotrichia  amplector  differs  from  N. 
ersitis  having  ventromesal  folds  of  segment  IX  that  embrace  the  subgenital  plate 
and  a  lack  of  sclerotized,  apical  hooks  on  the  apex  of  the  phallus. 


1  Received  on  April  21,  2003.  Accepted  on  December  8,  2003. 

department  of  Biology,  Clarion  University,  Clarion,  PA  16214,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  aketh@clarion.edu. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 165 


Male.  Length  1.9  mm.  18  antennal  segments.  Brown  in  alcohol.  Abdominal  segments  VII  and 

VIII  annular.  Segment  IX  arising  from  within  segments  VII  and  VIM.  anterior  margin  tapered  to  long, 
finger-like  projection;  posterior  margin  blunt,  sclerotized  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  producing 
bands  that  wrap  around  base  of  subgenital  plate  to  form  rounded,  overlapping  flaps  each  with  a  sin- 
gle, stout  seta  visible  between  inferior  appendages.  Segment  X  fused  with  dorsolateral  margins  of 
segment  IX,  long,  slender,  tapered  to  acute  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  dorsal  view  deeply  emarginate 
with  lateral  margins  sclerotized.  Genitalia  as  in  Fig.  1.  Subgenital  plate  thick,  broadening  slightly  to 
apex  having  sclerotized,  beak-like  apicoventral  projection  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  broad,  uni- 
form to  blunt  apex  with  long,  paired  apicolateral  setae  produced  from  sclerotized,  ridges  along  api- 
cal margins.  Inferior  appendage  short,  basally  rounded,  rapidly  constricted  at  2/3  length,  dorsally  ser- 
rate 2/3  length  to  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  triangular,  prominently  serrate  along  mesal 
margin  midlength  to  acute  apex.  Bracteoles  slender,  somewhat  spatulate  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral 
view  uniform,  curved  slightly  to  rectangular  apex.  Phallus  long,  narrow  with  preapical  constriction 
giving  rise  to  slender,  round  paramere;  apex  long,  broadening  slightly  over  entire  length  to  membra- 
nous tip;  ejaculatory  duct  uniform,  protruding  slightly  prior  to  phallus  tip. 

Female.  Unknown. 
Larva.  Unknown. 

Type  Material.  Holotype.  Mexico:  Tabasco.  Teapa,  Grutas  de  Colona,  Rio  Puyacatengo.  March 
7,  1988.  Barba  and  Barrera.  1  male  (NMNH). 

Etymology.  Latin:  of  embrace,  referring  to  the  ventromesal  folds  of  segment 

IX  that  embrace  the  subgenital  plate. 

Distribution.  Neotrichia  amplector  is  know  only  from  the  type  locality  in 
southern  Mexico. 


Neotrichia  amplio  Keth,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  3) 

Diagnosis.  Although  it  is  unlikely  that  Neotrichia  amplio  will  be  mistaken  for 
N.  okopa  Ross  (Fig.  4),  they  are  somewhat  similar  in  their  triangular  inferior 
appendages  and  subgenital  plates  lacking  projections.  Neotrichia  amplio  differs 
from  N.  okopa  having  many  long,  prominent  setae  on  the  inferior  appendages, 
minute  setae  covering  the  surface  of  the  subgenital  plate,  and  sclerotized,  apical 
ribbons  on  the  apex  of  the  phallus.  Neotrichia  amplio  is  also  larger  and  more 
robust  than  most  other  Neotrichia  species. 

Male.  Length  2.2  mm.  18  antennal  segments.  Brown  in  alcohol.  Segments  VII  and  VIII  annular. 
Segment  IX  arising  from  within  segment  VIII,  anterior  tapered,  angular;  posterior  margin  blunt,  scle- 
rotized. Segment  X  long,  basally  broad,  tapered  and  dorsally  setose  to  slender  apex  that  is  bifid  at 
extreme  tip  in  lateral  view;  in  dorsal  view  long,  broad,  uniform  to  bilobed  apex  with  each  lobe  flared 
slightly  at  extreme  tip.  Genitalia  as  in  Fig.  3.  Subgenital  plate  uniform  to  blunt  apex  with  dorsal  sur- 
face covered  with  short,  stout  setae  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  slender,  margins  rounded  to  lobate 
apex  producing  long,  paired,  apicolateral  setae;  tiny,  finger-like  projection  mesad  base  of  each  apical 
seta.  Inferior  appendage  broad,  curved,  tapered  to  acute  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  long, 
broad,  tapered  over  entire  length  to  rounded  apex,  margins  and  surface  with  multiple,  prominent 
setae;  fused  mesally  by  ornate,  sclerotized  ridge  from  base  to  midlength.  Bracteoles  short,  basally 
slender,  broadening  to  spatulate  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  stout,  nearly  uniform  to  apex, 
slightly  divergent.  Phallus  long,  constriction  prior  to  apex  giving  rise  to  flat,  ribbon-like  paramere 
covered  over  entire  length  with  fine,  stout  setae;  apex  long,  tapered  to  slightly  flared  tip  producing 
pair  of  sclerotized  knife-like  blades  along  lateral  surface;  superior  blade  long,  tapered,  inferior  blade 
l/2  length  of  superior  blade,  tapered  only  slightly  to  acute  apex;  ejaculatory  duct  uniform  to  phallus 
tip,  protruding. 


166 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  1.  Neotrichia  amplectot;  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


Vol.  114,  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 


167 


Figure  2.  Neotrichia  ersitis,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


168 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  3.  Neotrichia  amplio,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


169 


Figure  4.  Neotrichia  okopa,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


170  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Female.  Unknown. 
Larva.  Unknown. 

Type  Material.  Holotype.  Belize:  Orange  Walk  District.  New  River  Lagoon,  dock  area  at 
Lamanai  Ruins.  January  9,  1998.  L.  J.  Davenport.  1  Male  (NMNH). 

Etymology.  Spanish:  of  ample  or  full,  referring  to  the  robust  stature  of  this 
species. 

Distribution.  Neotrichia  amplio  is  know  only  from  the  type  locality  in  north- 
ern Belize. 


Neotrichia  garra  Keth,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  5) 

Diagnosis.  Although  it  is  unlikely  that  Neotrichia  garra  will  be  mistaken  for 
N.  aequispina  Angrisano  (Fig.  6),  they  are  somewhat  similar  in  their  slender, 
tapered  inferior  appendages  and  the  heavily  sclerotized  apicolateral  extensions  of 
segment  IX.  N.  garra  differs  in  the  bilobed,  translucent  apex  of  segement  X,  the 
beak-like  ventral  projection  of  the  apicolateral  extension  of  segment  IX,  and  in 

the  tapered  dorsal  flap  prior  to  the  phallus  tip. 

Male.  Length  1.9  mm.  Head  missing.  Golden-brown  in  alcohol.  Abdominal  segments  VII  and 
VIII  annular.  Segment  IX  arising  from  within  segments  VII  and  VIII,  anterior  margin  narrow,  finger- 
like;  posterior  margin  sclerotized,  fused  dorsally  with  segment  X,  producing  rectangular  apicolateral 
extension  with  prominent  ventral  beak  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  extension  visible  as  sclerotized 
knob  projecting  mesad  of  inferior  appendage.  Segment  X  tapered  to  acute  apex  with  translucent,  flap- 
like  extension  curved  dorsad  in  lateral  view;  in  dorsal  view  constricted  and  laterally  sclerotized  to 
apex,  deep  emargination  bridged  by  bilobed,  translucent  blade  projecting  posteriorly.  Genitalia  as  in 
Fig.  5.  Subgenital  plate  broadening  slightly  to  blunt  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  broad  to 
emarginate  apex  producing  paired,  apicolateral  setae.  Inferior  appendage  slender  and  tapered  to  acute 
apex,  curved  dorsad  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  basally  broad,  tapering  to  acute  apex,  divergent, 
with  setae  along  mesal  and  apical  margins.  Bracteoles  slender,  spatulate  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral 
view  uniform,  narrowed  slightly  at  apex.  Phallus  long,  narrow  with  slight  preapical  constriction  giv- 
ing rise  to  broad,  flat  paramere  projected  posteriorly  and  covered  with  minute  setae;  apex  uniform 
with  tapered,  sclerotized  flap  produced  along  dorsal  margin  prior  to  tip;  ejaculatory  duct  uniform  to 
phallus  tip,  non-protruding. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Larva.  Unknown. 

Type  Material.  Holotype.  Belize:  Orange  Walk  District.  New  River  Lagoon,  dock  area  at  La- 
manai Ruins.  January  9,  1998.  L.  J.  Davenport.  1  male  (NMNH). 

Etymology.  Spanish:  of  claw,  referring  to  the  claw-like  combination  of  the 
inferior  appendage  and  apicolateral  extension  of  segment  IX  in  lateral  view. 

Distribution.  Neotrichia  garra  is  known  only  from  the  type  locality  in  north- 
em  Belize. 


Neotrichia  mathisi  Keth,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  7) 

Diagnosis.  Neotrichia  mathis  is  most  similar  to  N.  rasmusseni  Harris  and  Keth 
(Fig.  8),  both  having  reduced,  knob-like  inferior  appendages  and  constricted  api- 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


171 


Figure  5.  Neotrichia  garra,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


172 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  6.  Neotrichia  aequispina,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


Vol.  114.  No.  3.  May  &  June  2003 


173 


Figure  7.  Neotrichia  mathisi,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


174  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


cal  extensions  of  segment  X.  Neotrichia  mathisi  differs  from  TV.  rasmusseni  in 
the  incised  apex  of  segment  X,  broad  subgenital  plate  lacking  an  incision,  and  in 

the  close  ventromesal  association  of  the  bracteoles. 

Male.  Length  1.8-2.0  mm.  18  antennal  segments.  Brown  in  alcohol.  Segments  VII  and  VIII  annu- 
lar. Segment  IX  arising  from  within  segments  VII  and  VIII,  anterior  margin  long,  finger-like;  poste- 
rior margin  rounded,  extending  posteriorly  in  lateral  view.  Segment  X  fused  dorsally  with  segment 
IX,  long,  robust,  tapered  to  blunt  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  dorsal  view  deeply  incised  producing  pair 
of  long  horns,  curved  mesad  at  apex  with  sclerous  margins  over  entire  length.  Genitalia  as  in  Fig.  7. 
Subgenital  plate  long  and  slender  to  apex  flared  slightly  dorsad  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  broad 
with  margins  tapered  to  squared  apex  producing  paired,  apicolateral  setae.  Inferior  appendage  great- 
ly reduced,  sclerous,  pincer-like  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  short,  cushion-like  with  long,  api- 
comesal  seta  and  apicolateral  finger  curving  mesad  and  producing  single,  apicolateral  seta.  Brac- 
teoles short,  nearly  uniform  to  rounded  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  fused  mesally  at  base, 
partially  covering  inferior  appendages  basally,  divergent  with  two  long,  prominent  setae  at  apex. 
Phallus  long,  constriction  prior  to  apex  giving  rise  to  flat,  ribbon-like  paramere  covered  over  entire 
length  with  fine,  stout  setae;  apex  long,  uniform  with  multiple,  scerotized,  finger-like  projections  en- 
compassing membranous  tip;  ejaculatory  duct  uniform  to  phallus  tip,  non-protruding. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Larva.  Unknown. 

Material  Examined.  Holotype.  Belize:  Orange  Walk  District.  New  River  Lagoon,  dock  area  at 
Lamanai  Ruins.  January  9,  1998.  L.  J.  Davenport,  1  male.  (NMNH)  Paratypes:  6  males.  (3  NMNH; 
3PSU) 

Etymology.  Named  in  memory  of  Michael  Mathis  in  recognition  of  his  con- 
tributions to  Trichoptera  systematics. 

Distribution.  Neotrichia  mathisi  is  know  only  from  the  type  locality  in 
northern  Belize. 


Neotrichia pulgara  Keth,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Fig.  9) 

Diagnosis.  Neotrichia  pulgara  is  most  similar  to  N.  maria  Bueno-Soria  and 
Hamilton  (Fig.  10),  both  having  heavily  sclerotized  apical  horns  projecting  from 
segment  X.  Neotrichia  pulgara  differs  from  N.  maria  primarily  in  the  straight, 
rod-like  aspect  of  the  horns  of  segment  X  and  in  the  long,  slender  phallus  apex 
with  dorsally  membranous,  scoop-like  tip.  The  apical  horns  of  Neotrichia  maria 
are  tapered  and  curved  markedly  mesad  and  the  phallus  apex  is  nearly  l/2  the 

length  of  that  seen  in  N.  pulgara. 

Male.  Length  1.9  mm.  Antennae  broken.  Brown  in  alcohol.  Segments  VII  and  VIII  annular. 
Segment  IX  arising  from  within  segments  VII  and  VIII,  anterior  margin  long,  finger-like;  posterior 
margin  reduced,  blunt,  with  apicolateral  extension  giving  rise  to  bracteole.  Segment  X  fused  dorsal- 
ly with  segment  IX,  long,  gently  curving  to  sclerous,  thumb-like  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  dorsal  view 
produced  as  paired,  sclerotized  rods  with  blunt,  rounded  apices.  Genitalia  as  in  Fig.  9.  Subgenital 
plate  long,  tapering  slightly  to  acute  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  broad  basally.  margins  ven- 
trally  folded  and  serrate,  apex  highly  constricted,  narrowly  emarginate,  with  paired  apical  setae. 
Inferior  appendage  long,  narrow,  having  dorsal  hump  near  midlength  with  2  prominent  setae  pro- 
jecting dorsally,  tapered  to  acute  apex  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral  view  basally  broad,  rapidly  con- 
stricted 2/3  length,  slender  2/3  length  to  thumb-like  apex,  shorter  than,  but  similar  in  appearance  to, 
dorsoapical  rods.  Bracteoles  short,  slender,  projecting  somewhat  dorsad  in  lateral  view;  in  ventral 
view  slender,  uniform.  Phallus  long,  slender,  preapical  constriction  giving  rise  to  broad,  flat  paramere 
projecting  posteriorly  and  covered  with  minute  setae;  apex  extremely  long  and  uniform,  tip  dorsally 


Vol.  114,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003 


175 


Figure  8.  Neotrichia  rasmusseni,  male  genitalia.    a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phal- 
lus. 


176 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


1 

1 

'    fa 

K* 

1 

G 

js 

i  $ 

1 

% 

i 

B 


Figure  9.  Neotrichia pulgara,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  3,  Mav  &  June  2003 


177 


Figure  10.  Neotrichia  maria,  male  genitalia.  a.  lateral  b.  ventral  c.  dorsal  d.  phallus. 


178  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


membranous  and  broadening  slightly  with  lightly  sclerous  margins  and  finger-like  processes  pro- 
jecting ventrally  at  tip  base  and  posteriorly  at  extreme  tip;  ejaculatory  duct  uniform,  protruding  ven- 
trad  prior  to  phallus  tip. 

Female.  Unknown. 

Larva.  Unknown. 

Type  Material.  Holotype.  Belize:  Orange  Walk  District.  New  River  Lagoon,  dock  area  at 
Lamanai  Ruins.  January  9,  1998.  L  J.  Davenport.  1  male  (NMNH). 

Etymology.  Spanish:  of  thumb,  referring  to  the  sclerotized  thumb-like  inferi- 
or appendages  and  apical  extensions  of  segment  X. 

Distribution.  Neotrichia  pulgara  is  known  only  from  the  type  locality  in 
northern  Belize. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  Pennsylvania  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  at  The  Pennsylvania  State  University  support- 
ed this  work.  I  thank  Bruce  McPheron  for  that  support  and  I  thank  Steve  Harris  at  Clarion  University 
for  the  use  of  his  lab  and  for  critical  review  of  the  manuscript.  I  recognize  Larry  Davenport  at  Sanford 
University,  Birmingham,  AL,  for  collecting  most  of  the  material  and  the  California  Academy  of 
Sciences,  Andrew  Rasmussen  at  Florida  A&M  University,  the  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey,  and 
Oliver  Flint,  Jr.  at  the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  (Smithsonian)  for  loans  of  material  for 
study. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Flint,  O.  S.  Jr.,  R.  W.  Holzenthal,  and  S.  C.  Harris.  1999.  Catalog  of  the  Neotropical  caddisflies 
(Insecta:  Trichoptera).  Special  Publication  of  the  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio.  239 
pp. 

Frazer,  K.  S.  and  S.  C.  Harris.  1 99 1 .  New  caddisflies  (Trichoptera)  from  the  Little  River  Drainage 
in  Northeastern  Alabama.  Bulletin  of  the  Alabama  Museum  of  Natural  History  1 1 :5-9. 

Harris,  S.  C.  1990.  New  species  of  Neotrichia  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae)  from  Central  and  South 
America.  Journal  of  the  New  York  Entomological  Society  98:246-260. 

Harris,  S.  C.  1991.  New  caddisflies  (Trichoptera)  from  Alabama  and  Florida.  Bulletin  of  the 
Alabama  Museum  of  Natural  History  11:11-16. 

Keth,  A.  C.  2002.  Taxonomy  of  the  genus  Neotrichia  and  related  taxa  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae: 
Neotrichiini).  Ph.  D.  Thesis.  Pennsylvania  State  University.  University  Park,  Pennsylvania.  327 
pp. 

Marshall,  J.  E.  1979.  A  review  of  the  genera  of  the  Hydroptilidae  (Trichoptera).  Bulletin  of  the 
British  Museum  (Natural  History)  Entomology  39:135-239. 

Morse,  J.  C.  1993.  A  checklist  of  the  Trichoptera  of  North  America,  including  Greenland  and 
Mexico.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  19:47-93. 

Morse,  J.  C.  1997.  Checklist  of  World  Trichoptera.  In,  Proceedings  of  the  Eighth  International 
Symposium  on  Trichoptera,  XXIII  +496.  Holzenthal,  R.  W.  and  O.  S.  Flint,  Jr.  Editors.  Special 
Publication  of  the  Ohio  Biological  Survey.  Columbus,  Ohio.  pp.  339-342. 

Wiggins,  G.  B.  1998.  Larvae  of  the  North  American  Caddisfly  Genera  (Trichoptera),  2nd  Edition. 
University  of  Toronto  Press.  Toronto,  Buffalo,  London,  pp.  71-109. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  3,  May  &  June  2003  1 79 


BOOK  REVIEW 

INSECTS  OF  THE  TEXAS  LOST  PINES.  (W.  L.  Moody  Jr.,  Natural  History  Series, 
No.  33).  Stephen  Welton  Taber  and  Scott  B.  Fleenor.  2003.  ISBN  1-58544-235-6. 
Cloth  US  $50.00,  1-58544-236-4.  Paperback  US  $24.95,  296  pp.  209  B+W  photos, 
1  map.  Texas  A  &  M  University  Press.  College  Station,  TX  77843,  U.S.A.  www. 
tamu.edu/upress. 

The  Lost  Pines  of  Texas  are  diverse  vegetation  islands  that  support  isolated  colonies  of  loblolly  pine 
(Pinus  taeda)  at  their  western-most  range  limit  as  well  as  a  mix  of  Post-Oak  Savanna  and  Tall-Grass 
Prairie.  These  communities  are  confined  largely  to  Bastrop  and  Fayerte  Counties  in  Central  Texas,  isolat- 
ed from  more  contiguous  Piney  Woods  of  East  Texas.  Given  this  specific  scope  of  this  book,  the  authors 
and  publisher  (whose  previous  works  include  the  more  widely  appealing  Fire  Ants  and  The  World  of  the 
Harvester  Ants)  are  to  be  congratulated  for  going  the  distance  to  publish  this  book.  Still,  while  the  intent 
is  laudable,  the  execution  is  somewhat  lacking. 

One  major  fault  is  the  absence  of  color  photographs  [other  than  the  obvious  "art  photo"  of  the  cover, 
a  spread  specimen  of  a  zebra  longwing  butterfly  (Heliconius  charithonia),  a  species  that  the  authors  report 
as  sighting  on  only  a  single  occasion  (pp.  25),  against  the  bark  of  a  loblolly  pine].  If  the  intent  was  a  guide 
to  identification  for  naturalists  and  visitors  to  the  region,  then  color  would  have  been  an  obvious  selling 
point.  The  excessive  use  of  black  and  white  photographs,  many  of  them  of  specimens  (though  in  many 
cases  too  small  to  be  useful)  argues  that  the  authors'  intent  was  to  publish  a  scientific  work.  Unfortunately, 
their  intent  falls  short,  leaving  this  book  without  an  obvious  audience. 

The  book  is  prefaced  well  with  a  short  "Introduction"  and  a  look  at  "The  Lost  Pines  as  a  Setting  for 
Animal  Life,"  and  then  treats  some  280  taxa  in  13  chapters  (including  "Spiders,  Scorpions  and  Other 
Arachnids,"  as  well  as  those  other  well-known  insects,  the  "'Molluscs  and  Earthworms").  Two  appendices 
["Endemic  Texas  Insects  Occurring  in  the  Lost  Pines"  (9  species)  and  "Exotic  Animals  Occurring  in  the 
Lost  Pines"  (6  insect  and  2  earthworms  species)]  and  a  useful  bibliography  and  index  complete  the  text. 
While  the  first  two  chapters  provide  much  useful  background  information  on  the  region,  they  fail  to  doc- 
ument the  methods  employed  by  the  authors  (how  long,  where,  or  when  their  studies  were  conducted)  or 
the  scope  of  their  survey.  The  reader  is  left  with  no  basis  on  which  to  judge  their  remarks  in  the  subse- 
quent species  treatments.  In  fact,  given  the  number  of  interpretive  speculations  and  other  problems  with 
the  text,  this  reviewer  wonders  who,  if  anyone,  subjected  this  book  to,  as  the  authors  state,  "the  fire  of 
peer  review  that  is  expected  of  scientific  work"  (pp.  10). 

The  choice  of  taxa  covered  is  remarkably  uneven — regardless  of  group — even  given  the  authors'  stat- 
ed reasoning  to  include  those  "that  have  seldom  or  never  been  illustrated  before"  (pp.  10).  For  example, 
in  the  "Butterflies  and  Moths,"  the  authors  treat  25  butterfly  species  under  19  headings  (with  B/W  photos 
of  17  species),  with  a  note  that  8  additional  species,  found  in  an  "unpublished  1968  document"  (pp.  18) 
in  the  files  of  the  Texas  Parks  &  Wildlife  Department,  occur  in  the  Lost  Pines.  Most  species  shown  in  the 
book  are  large,  common  in  Texas  and  "charismatic"  taxa  that  have  been  profusely  illustrated  (in  color)  in 
many  other  books.  The  authors  virtually  ignore  25%  of  the  butterflies  by  including  only  one  of  the  14 
species  of  pierids  and  none  of  the  skippers  known  to  occur  here  (www.  esb.utexas.edu/philjs/Stengl/lists/ 
butterflies.html)  long  before  this  book  was  published.  Only  eight  out  of  the  almost  1000  species  of  moths 
are  treated  (www.esb.utexas.edu/  philjs/Stengl/lists/moths.html). 

Additional  criticisms,  common  enough  to  be  indicative  of  the  poor  quality  of  the  book,  are  the  lack  of 
apparent  order  to  either  the  sequence  of  chapters  or  the  sequence  in  the  taxa  covered  within  chapters  (for 
example,  Anaxjunius  is  found  on  pp.  184  while  A.  longipes  is  found  on  pp.  195),  scientific  names  of  some 
plants  are  omitted  (e.g.  Hercules-club  on  pp.  22)  and  common  name  sources  are  not  cited.. 

Phil  Schappert,  Stengl  "Lost  Pines"  Biological  Station  /  Integrative  Biology, 
University  of  Texas  at  Austin,  Austin,  TX  78712-0253,  U.S.A.  E-mail:  philjs@mail.utexas.edu. 


Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


1 80  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

A  JOYFUL  NOISE,  POEMS  FOR  TWO  VOICES.  Paul  Fleischman.  Illustrated  by 
Eric  Beddows.  1988.  Harper  Trophy  Publishing.  44  pp.  Paperback.  ISBN 
0064460932.  US$5.99. 

The  spectrum  of  adjectives  used  to  describe  our  human  sentiment  towards  insects  spans  from  glori- 
ous to  ghastly.  As  our  numerous  co-inhabitants  of  Earth,  insects'  role  in  the  ecosystem  is  varied  and  val- 
ued, marveled  at,  and  painstakingly  studied.  But  while  biologists  dance  with  joy  over  the  evolutionary 
genius  of  Batesian  mimicry,  others  scream  with  horror  at  the  sight  of  the  common  cockroach.  Paul 
Fleischman  however,  simply  enjoys  them.  Through  his  Newberry  Award-winning  book,  A  Joyful  Noise, 
Poems  for  Two  Voices,  he  invites  the  teacher  and  student  of  entomology,  as  well  as  the  entomonaive,  to 
find  simplicity  in  an  ordinarily  complex  field.  He  urges  the  indifferent  to  appreciate,  the  innocent  to  ask 
questions,  and  the  fearful  to  take  a  closer  look.  Written  to  be  read  aloud  simultaneously  by  two  readers, 
this  book  is  a  fun,  interactive,  and  educational  experience  for  just  about  anyone. 

A  Jovfnl  Noise,  Poems  for  Two  Voices  is  composed  of  fourteen  poems  about  insects  ranging  from  the 
irksome  crickets  (Gryllidae)  to  the  more  popular  lepidopterans,  which  include  the  butterflies,  moths, 
and  skippers.  Fleischman,  who  writes  each  poem  from  the  insect's  perspective,  allows  readers  to  more 
easily  appreciate  and  relate  to  the  plight  of  insects.  He  describes  the  ephemeral  lifespan  of  mayflies,  for 
which  their  order,  Ephemeroptera,  is  named.  He  also  marvels  at  the  eusociality  of  honeybees  (Apidae), 
the  bioluminescence  of  fireflies  (Lampyridae),  and  the  seemingly  physics-defying  mode  of  locomotion 
characteristic  of  water  striders  (Gerridae).  Finally,  Fleishman  depicts  the  behavior  of  more  pesky 
insects.  The  booklice  share  their  simple  enjoyment  of  Shakespeare  and  Horace,  and  cicadas  explain  that 
their  swarming  is  a  celebration  of  the  world  above  after  spending  years  underground.  Throughout  each 
of  these  intriguing  and  often  humorous  depictions,  Fleishman  manages  to  incorporate  a  few  more  com- 
monplace facts,  for  example,  the  time  of  year  that  grasshoppers  spawn  or  the  competition  between  dig- 
ger wasps  and  beetles. 

The  illustrations,  by  Eric  Beddows,  are  another  unique  feature  of  A  Joyful  Noise.  They  exhibit  some 
degree  of  true  anatomical  detail,  but  are  anthropomorphized  just  enough  to  make  the  little  bugs  endear- 
ing. One  that  stands  out  in  particular  is  an  illustration  of  the  queen  bee  in  "Honeybees."  Beddows 
depicts  her  delicate  membranous  wings  (for  which  the  honeybee's  order,  Hymenoptera,  is  named)  but 
also  adds  eye  lids  and  lashes  to  give  her  an  appearance  that  is  feminine  and  distinctly  human.  He  also 
has  her  lying  on  a  chaise  lounge  as  if  she  were  a  queen  resting  in  her  drawing  room.  Additionally,  on 
the  inside  cover,  there  are  what  appear  to  be  scientific  drawings  of  stick  bugs  (Phasmatodea).  These  par- 
ticular bugs,  however,  are  intellectuals  avidly  reading  their  books.  The  queen  bee  and  stick  bug  make 
for  just  two  of  many  memorable  illustrations. 

While  all  of  Fleischman 's  poems  are  written  to  be  read  aloud  jointly  by  two  people,  select  lines  are 
meant  to  be  read  in  sequence,  and  others  are  meant  to  be  read  in  synchrony.  This  presents  readers  with 
an  opportunity  to  share  this  wonderfully  interactive  experience  and  is  suitable  for  all  combinations  of 
experts  and  beginners.  It  also  reminds  us  of  the  soothing,  rhythmic  sound  of  chirping  insects  that  marks 
a  blazing  summer  afternoon,  or  that  lulls  us  to  sleep  at  night.  Overall,  this  informative,  humorous  and 
stimulating  collection  of  poems  instills  a  new  appreciation  for  insects  in  readers  of  every  age  and  back- 
ground. 

Bethany  Sadlowski,  Arlington,  Virginia  22202  U.S.A.  E-mail:  b_sadlowski@yahoo.com 
Julia  Louie,  University  of  Maryland,  College  Park,  MD  20742  U.S.A.  E-mail:  julouieuMiiaid.nih.gov. 


1  Received  on  January  10,  2002;  Accepted  on  June  18,  2002. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  California,  Riverside,  California  92521,  U.S.A.  E-mail  of 
author  J-W  K:  argidsOKa'tamu.edu. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  Book  Reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review  within  30  days.  The  Editor  reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manu- 
script to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcomed  to  list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  arti- 
cle should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  Editors  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  Editor  and  the  Business  Manager,  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  file,  together  with  the  reprint 
order  form  as  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  within  72  hours  and  return  them  to  the  Editor  and 
to  the  Business  Editor  by  air  mail  or  email  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are 
urged  to  provide  forwarding  orders  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not 
approved  within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  Editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send 
them  to  the  printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  $25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  $30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  half-tones  at  the  rate  of  $30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  These 
charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004  United 
States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts.  There 
are  no  page  charges  for  Book  Reviews.  Page  and  reprints  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to 
whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is: 
3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  Email:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  13-16  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  They  will  be 
billed  in  advance  together  with  page  charges.  The  following  rates,  all  in  US  dollars,  apply. 

Reprints:  100  200  300  400  500 
Pages 

1  44  48  50  52  54 

2  46  50  52  54  56 

3  48  52  54  56  58 

4  50  54  56  58  60 

5  76  86  96  106  116 

6  78  88  98  108  118 
80  90  100  110  120 

8  82  92  102  112  122 

9-12  120  130  145  160  180 

13-16  160  170  185  200  220 

Starting  with  Volume  1 14(3)  Entomological  News  reprints  as  a  .pdf  (portable  document 
format)  will  be  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  Business 
Manager,  Faith  Kuehn  (fbkuehn@yahoo.com). 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company.  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1;  fax  (302)  678-8091:  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132.  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENRECand 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042.  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor,  Michigan  4SI()h  9866,  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  /•.'»/><//;</<•</. 


39088010578706 
Cicada  - 
Why  Have  You  Stayed  Away  So  Long 

Benjamin  C.  Garber85 ' 

Big  red  eyes,  gossamer  wings, 
I  sure  do  Love  the  way  you  sing 
It's  your  time,  to  sing  your  song 
A  million  friends  can  sing  along 

Chorus 
Cicada,  what  are  you  made  of 

Why  have  you  stayed  away  so  long 
Oh  Cicada,  we'll  see  ya  later 

But,  please  don't  stay  away  so  long 

Seventeen  years  underground 
Sucking  sap  and  make  no  sound 

Crawl  on  out,  peal  that  shell 

"This  bug  needs  a  Hug,"  you  start  to  yell. 

Chorus 

Now  I  have  seen  the  recipes 

Stewed  and  fried  and  fricasseed 

But  when  I  think  of  you  as  a  meal 

My  stomach  starts  to  squeal 

Chorus 

You  have  your  fun,  lay  eggs  in  a  tree 
And  then  you  die,  what  more  can  there  be. 

Well  that's  my  song  and  it's  been  fun 

I'll  bring  it  back  in  two  thousand  twenty-one 

Chorus 


'29  Clarks  Lane,  Reistertown,  MD  21136  U.S.A.  E-mail:  BenGarber@POBox.com  or  www. 
BenGarber.com.  This  children's  song  has  been  copyrighted  by  the  author. 

Mailed  on  July  28,  2004 


USISSN  0013-872X 
PTEMBER  &  OCTOBER  2003  No.  4 

MOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Corrections  and  additions  to  the  genus  Agallia  (Homoptera, 
Cicadellidae,  Agallinae)  of  the  Americas 


Paul  H.  Freytag    181 


New  records  of  encyrtid  parasitoids  of  Kermes  palestiniensis 

Balachowsky  (Hemiptera:  Kermesidae),  with  the  description  of  a  new 
species  of  Blastothrix  Mayr  (Hymenoptera:  Encyrtidae)  from  Turkey 

George  O.  Japoshvili  and  Ismail  Karaca    187 

A  new  species  of  Homalotylus  (Hymenoptera:  Encyrtidae)  from  Mexico, 
parasitoid  of  Azya  orbigera  orbigera  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae) 

Vladimir  A.  Trjapitzin  and  Serguei  V.  Trjapitzin    192 

Territoriality  and  singing-site  preferences  in  the  cricket,  Cyphoderris 

monstrosa  (Orthoptera:  Haglidae)  in  western  North  America  J.  Ladau    197 

Adult  Chloropidae  (Diptera)  associated  with  constructed  treatment  wetlands 
modified  by  three  vegetation  management  techniques 

J.  B.  Keiper,  M.  Stanczak,  and  W.  E.  Walton    205 

Heteropteran  adventitious  biters  (Hemiptera):  primitively  predaceous? 

Carl  W.  Schaefer    211 

Copestylum  circumdatum  (Walker)  (Diptera:  Syrphidae):  redescription  of  a 
Neotropical  flower  fly  with  lectotype  designations,  and  new  synonyms 

F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Luciane  Marinoni    217 

A  checklist  of  the  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest 

in  Kentucky,  U.S.A.  D.  C.  Tarter  and  Dwight  L.  Chaffee   224 

New  records  of  mayflies  (Ephemeroptera)  from  Alberta,  Canada 

J.  M.  Webb  and  W.  R  McCafferty    230 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

Triacanthagyna  trijida  (Odonata:  Aeshnidae):  New  state  record  of  dragonfly 
from  South  Carolina,  U.S.A.  R.  A.  Jenkins  and  J.  M.  Jenkins    233 

First  record  of  Dasycorixa  rawsoni  (Hemiptera:  Corixidae)  in  the  United  States 

Bruce  A.  Hanson,  Ned  H.  Eitliss  Jr.,  David  M.  Mushet, 

and  Steve  W.  Chordas  HI   235 
BOOK  REVIEWS: 
Quality  control  and  production  of  biological  control  agents.  Theory  and 

testing  procedures  by  J.  C.  van  Lenteren  Raymond  A.  Cloyd   237 

The  genus  Adclpha:  Its  systematics,  biology  and  biogeography  (Lepidoptera: 

Nymphalidae:  Limenitidini)  by  K.  R.  wiii™^ft  Robert  K.  Rohhins    238 


AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  S 
Society  Meeting  of  March  23,  2003 
Society  Meeting  of  October  22,  2003 
Society  Meeting  of  November  19,  2003 


IKTY  BUSINESS 

AU6  3  1  2004 


Jtwi  (iclliaiis    239 
Jj/ii  Celhaus    240 
'on  (iclltaus 

Back  Cover 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  AUGUST  25,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1.0 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomologi- 
cal Society  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway.  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1 195.  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  email  aes@acnatsci.org;  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci.org/hosted/aes. 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  Members  of  the  Society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US  $30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the 
USA  and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues,  when  available, 
are  sold  by  complete  volume  for  US  $15  to  Members  and  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  or  email  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  Editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890- 
1920  Henry  Skinner  (1861-1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.^Calvert  (1871-1961);  1945-1967  R.G. 
Schmieder  (1898-1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.  Arnett,  Jr.  ( 1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974- 
2002  Howard  P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News:  Version  1.0. 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://www.geocities.coni/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author  although  papers 
from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that  all 
prospective  authors  join  the  society. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  Editor:  Address. 

All  manuscripts,  including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomol- 
ogical News  as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A. 
Santiago-Blay  at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121 ,  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012 
U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mailing  service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.O.  Box,  please  use 
this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Loading  Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other 
means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are,  as  follows:  phone  (202)  786-2876,  Fax  (202)  786-2832,  web  page 
http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact.htm,  e-mails  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu  or 
blayj@hotmail.com.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  Editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them 
to  a  colleague  for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  except  for  original 
artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  type  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for 
the  Acknowledgments  and  the  Literature  Cited. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 IS1 

CORRECTIONS  AND  ADDITIONS  TO 

THE  GENUS  AGALLIA 

(HOMOPTERA,  CICADELLIDAE,  AGALLIINAE) 
OF  THE  AMERICAS' 

Paul  H.  Frcytag2 

ABSTRACT:  The  species  Agallia  lingula  Van  Duzee  from  Jamaica  and  A.  peregrinans  (Stal)  from 
Brazil  are  redescribed  and  discussed.  Also  three  new  species,  A.  nielsoni  (U.S.A.,  Mexico,  Central 
America,  Columbia  and  Venezuela),  A.  peck  (Ecuador),  and  A.  rotunda  (Venezuela)  are  described. 
The  new  species  were  confused  with  the  older  species  and  differences  between  these  species  are  dis- 
cussed. Lectotypes  are  designated  for  A.  lingula  and  A.  peregrinans  to  help  eliminate  confusion. 

KEY  WORDS:  Agallia,  Homoptera,  Cicadellidae,  Agallinae,  North,  Central,  and  South  America. 

The  Agallia  species  of  North,  Central,  and  South  America  are  fairly  well 
known  and  described,  and  in  general  lead  to  little  confusion.  However,  the 
species  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee  has  been  misidentified  from  the  time  Oman  (1933) 
published  his  paper  on  the  North  American  species  of  the  subfamily  Agalliinae. 
This  error  is  corrected  in  this  paper  while  describing  the  five  species  involved. 
The  species  included  are  the  two  described  species,  A.  lingula  and  A.  peregrinans 
(Stal),  and  three  new  species.  All  five  species  are  nearly  the  same  size  and  with 
the  same  external  features  (Osborn  1924,  plate  LIX;  Oman  1938,  plate  XLV) 
within  the  common  variation  that  occurs  in  each  of  the  species.  However,  the  five 
species  belong  to  three  distinct  species  groups  within  the  genus  Agallia  mainly 
based  on  genitalic  characters. 

Agallia  lingula  Van  Duzee 

(Figures  2-4) 

Agallia  lingula.  Van  Duzee  1907,  p.  54  (Type  locality  -  Jamaica,  Montego  Bay). 
Agallia  lingula,  Oman  1933,  p.  33  (in  part,  Jamaica  records  only). 
Agallia  lingula,  DeLong  and  Caldwcll  1937,  p.  2  (in  part,  Jamaica  records  only). 
Agallia  lingula,  DeLong  and  Knull  1945,  p.  13  (in  part,  Jamaica  records  only). 
Agallia  peregrinans,  Linnavuori  1968,  p.  149.  Misidentified. 

Agallia  peregrinans,  Nielson  and  Godoy  1995,  p.  14ft  (in  part,  Jamaica  records  only).  Misidentified 
not  A.  peregrinans  Stal. 

Length.  Males  3.3-3.6  mm,  females  3.4-  3.7  mm.  This  species  is  very  closely  related  to  A.  lin- 
gulata  Olsen  found  in  the  United  States  (Oman,  1933),  with  the  same  type  of  male  genitalia  only 
slightly  smaller  and  the  same  type  of  female  seventh  sternum  with  a  lingulate  median  process. 


1  Received  on  June  5,  2003.  Accepted  on  March  13,  2004. 

-'Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Kentucky,  Lexington,  Kentucky  40546-0091   U.S.A. 
E-mail:  pfreytagfrriix. netcom.com. 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  1 14  (4):  ISI.  September  &  October  2003 
Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


182 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


PEREGRINANS 


LINGULA 


0.5mm 


NIELSONI 


PECKI 


ROTUNDA 


0.5mm 


Figure  1.  Agallia  peregrinans  (Stal).  Figures  2-4.  A.  lingiila  Van  Duzee.  Figures  5-6.  A. 
nielsoni  n.  sp.  Figures  7-8.  A.  pecki  n.  sp.  Figures  9-10.  A.  robusta  n.  sp.  Figures  1,  2,  5, 
7,  and  9  depict  male  genital  capsule,  lateral  view,  all  drawn  to  same  scale.  Figure  3,  illus- 
trates male  aedeagus,  ventral  view.  Figures  4,  6,  8,  and  10  represent  female  seventh  ster- 
num, ventral  view,  all  drawn  to  same  scale. 


Male  Genitalia.  Similar  to  A.  lingulata  in  general  appearance  (Fig.  2).  Plates  short,  stout. 
Pygofer  with  posterior  margin  evenly  rounded.  Aedeagus  (Fig.  3)  with  long  stem,  bifurcate,  upturned 
at  apex.  Connective  long,  not  bent  near  base. 

Female  Cenitalia.  Seventh  sternum  (Fig.  4)  similar  to  A.  lingulata  with  median  Ungulate  process 
short  and  rounded  at  apex. 

Types.  Three  syntypes  (one  male  and  two  females)  labeled  Montego  Bay,  Jamaica.;  Apr.  '06; 
E  P  Van  Duzee  Collector,  (California  Academy  of  Sciences  Collection).  The  male  is  herein  designat- 
ed as  the  Lectotype  of  this  species  and  is  so  labeled.  The  three  specimens  have  type  labels  indicating 
Lectotype,  Allotype,  and  Paratype,  but  these  labels  have  no  standing  as  there  has  been  no  reference 
to  this  in  the  literature.  For  stability,  I  have  chosen  the  male  to  represent  this  species,  even  though  all 
three  types  are  without  a  doubt  the  same  species.  All  three  specimens  have  been  examined,  and  are 
in  good  condition,  except  for  one  female  which  shows  a  small  amount  of  dennestid  damage. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 183 

Distribution.  This  species  is  only  known  from  Jamaica  and  only  from  the 
type  series. 

Notes.  This  species  has  been  misidentified  almost  from  the  time  it  was 
described.  Van  Duzee  (1907)  described  this  species  from  the  three  types  men- 
tioned above  Oman  (1933)  examined  a  female  syntype  and  determined  that  it 
was  the  same  as  the  Central  American  species  being  described  as  new  in  this 
paper.  On  the  basis  of  the  female  the  identification  of  this  species  was  wrongly 
placed.  All  subsequent  workers  followed  his  identification  until  recently  when 
Linnavuori  (1968)  and  Nielson  and  Godoy  (1995)  misidentified  this  species  fur- 
ther by  placing  it  in  synonymy  with  A.  peregrinans.  This  was  based  on  a  wrong 
indication  by  Linnavuori  (1968)  and  Linnavuori  and  DeLong  (1979),  and  will  be 
discussed  further  under  that  species. 

This  species  belongs  to  a  small  group  of  species  which  is  characterized  by 
having  the  male  aedeagus  v-shaped  in  lateral  view  extending  from  a  long  con- 
nective which  places  the  aedeagus  near  the  dorsal  part  of  the  genital  chamber, 
and  the  female  seventh  sternum  with  a  Ungulate  median  process.  This  group 
includes  the  following  three  species:  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee,  A.  lingulota  Olsen 
1900,  and  A.  neoalbidula  Oman  1938.  Possibly  A.  striolaris  (Butler)  1877  also 
belongs  in  this  group,  but  the  female  is  unknown. 


Agallia  nielsoni,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  5-6) 

Agallia  lingula,  Oman  1933,  p.  33  (in  part.  Central  America,  Mexico  and  USA  records)  not  A.  lin- 
gula Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  lingula,  Oman  1934,  p.  454,  not /I.  lingula  Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  lingula.  DeLong  and  Caldwell  1937,  p.  2  (in  part.  Central  American,  Mexican  and  USA 
records)  not  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  lingula,  DeLong  and  Knull  1945,  p.  13  (in  part,  Central  American,  Mexican  and  USA  rec- 
ords) not  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  lingula,  Oman  1949,  p.  37,  not  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  lingula,  Linnavuori  1956,  p.  6  and  14,  not  A.  lingula  Van  Duzee. 

Agallia  peregrinans,  Linnavuori  1968,  p.  149,  misidentified,  not  A.  peregrinans  Stal. 

Agallia peregrinans.  Nielson  and  Godoy  1995,  p.  146  (in  part.  Central  American,  Mexican  and  USA 
records,  misidentified,  not  A.  peregrinans  Stal). 

Length.  Males  3.4-3.6  mm,  females  3.5-3.8  mm. Externally  very  similar  to  A.  lingula,  but  with 
quite  different  male  genitalia. 

Male  m  mi. Hi. i.  Plates  (Fig.  5)  short,  extending  to  near  apex  of  pygofer.  Pygofer  with  dorsal  sur- 
face rounded  to  apex,  with  a  thickened  margin,  apex  roundedly  pointed.  Aedeagus  (Fig.  5)  strap-like, 
curving  back  alongside  connective  in  nearly  a  complete  circle,  apex  near  anal  lube,  pointed,  needle- 
like.  Connective  long,  arched,  extending  to  near  base  of  anal  tube. 

Female  gcnitalia.  Seventh  sternum  (Fig.  6)  \\ith  narrow  lingulate  process  in  middle,  length  of 
process  less  then  length  of  segment,  with  apex  somewhat  truncate. 

Types.  Holotype  male.  Honduras,  HI  Zamorano,  December  24,  1960.  P.  H.  Freytag,  sweeping 
sweet  potatoes.  Allotype  female,  same  data  as  holotype.  Paratypes:  One  male  and  two  females,  same 


184  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


data  as  holotype,  but  without  host  plant  data.  Holotype  and  Allotype  in  the  California  Academy  of 
Sciences  collection  and  the  three  paratypes  in  the  University  of  Kentucky  collection. 

Distribution.  This  species  is  one  of  the  most  common  Agallia  species  in 
Central  America.  Many  specimens  have  been  seen  from  the  USA  (Texas),  Mexi- 
co, all  of  Central  America,  Colombia,  and  Venezuela.  Literature  citations  also 
record  this  species  from  Louisiana,  but  I  have  not  seen  any  specimens  to  back  up 
this  locality  record. 

Etymology.  This  species  is  named  for  Merv  Nielson  who  has  done  so  much 
recent  work  on  this  subfamily. 

Notes.  This  species  is  the  one  illustrated  in  Oman  (1933)  as  A.  lingula  (Fig- 
ures 6  a-c  and  15  h).  The  genitalia  of  both  the  male  and  female  are  quite  differ- 
ent from  A.  lingula  as  illustrated.  This  species  is  found  primarily  in  Central 
America  and  has  never  been  collected  in  the  Caribbean  Islands.  This  species 
belongs  to  a  group  of  species  that  have  the  recurved  aedeagus  which  is  long  and 
needle  like,  a  short  genital  plate,  and  the  female  seventh  sternum  with  a  Ungulate 
process.  This  group  is  made  up  of  three  species  described  in  this  paper,  A.  niel- 
soni  A.  pecki,  and  A  rotunda. 


Agallia  pecki,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  7-8) 

Length.  Males  3.3-3.5  mm,  females  3.4-3.6  mm.  Similar  to  A.  niclsoni  in  general  external  char- 
acters, but  with  different  male  and  female  genitalia. 

Male  genitalia.  Plates  (Fig. 7)  short,  stout,  extending  to  apex  of  pygofer.  Pygofer,  in  lateral  view, 
nearly  triangular,  with  dorsal  surface  nearly  straight,  with  three  to  four  papilla-like  setae  near  apex 
(exaggerated  slightly  in  drawing).  Aedeagus  similar  to  A.  nielsoni  in  shape,  but  slightly  larger.  Con- 
nective long,  arched,  extending  to  near  base  of  anal  tube. 

Female  genitalia.  Seventh  sternum  (Fig.  8)  with  lingulate  median  process,  length  about  half 
median  length  of  segment,  apex  bluntly  rounded. 

Types.  Holotype  male,  Ecuador,  Galapagos  Islands,  Santa  Cruz,  1  km  S  Media  Luna,  Miconia, 
55()m.,  2-8-II-1989,  dung  trap,  B.  J.  Sinclair.  Allotype  female  same  data  as  holotype.  Paratypes:  31 
(17  males.  14  females);  1  male  same  data  as  holotype;  2  females,  same  data  as  holotype  except 
600m.,  21-1-1989  uv-light,  S.  Peck  89-6;  16  males,  12  females,  same  data  as  holotype  except  500m., 
1 -29-11- 1989,  FIT-trough,  Peck  and  Sinclair  89-39.  Holotype,  allotype  and  1  male,  2  female  paratypes 
in  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences;  4  male,  4  female  paratypes  in  the  University  of  Kentucky 
Collection;  4  male  4  female  paratypes  in  the  Canadian  National  Collection,  4  male,  1  female  para- 
types in  the  National  Collection  in  Ecuador;  4  male,  1  female  paratypes  in  the  Catholic  University 
Collection  in  Quito,  Ecuador. 

Distribution.  Over  2,000  specimens  of  this  species  have  been  seen  from  the 
following  Islands:  Santa  Cruz,  Floreana,  Santiago,  Isabela  and  Fernandina.  The 
complete  listing  of  the  localities  and  where  the  specimens  are  deposited  can  be 
obtained  from  the  author.  This  is  without  a  question  the  most  common  Agallia 
species  on  the  Islands  at  this  time.  Three  females  which  fit  this  species  are  also 
known  from  Guayaquil,  Ecuador,  in  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences  collec- 
tion. 

Etymology.  This  species  is  named  for  Stuart  Peck  who  collected  most  of  the 
specimens  of  this  species.  His  extensive  work  on  the  Galapagos  Islands  is  also 
well  known. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 1S5 

Notes.  This  species  appears  to  be  a  recent  introduction  from  the  costal  region 
of  the  mainland.  It  also  seems  to  have  replaced  the  earlier  species  which  were 
known  from  the  Galapagos  Islands.  Both  previously  known  Aga/lia  species,  A. 
plana  (Butler  1877)  and  A.  striolaris  (Butler  1877)  have  not  been  collected  in 
recent  years. 


Agallia  peregrinans  (Stal) 

(Figure  1 ) 

Bythoscopits  peregrinans  Stal  1 859. 

Agallia  peregrinans  Linnavuori  and  DeLong  1979. 

Length.  Males  3.6-3.9  mm.,  females  3.8-4  mm.  This  species  was  originally  described  from  Rio 
de  Janeiro,  Brazil,  although  several  other  localities  were  mentioned  at  that  time,  such  as  Oahu. 
Hawaii,  Tahiti  and  California.  At  the  same  time  an  unnamed  variety  was  described  from  Rio  de 
Janeiro,  Brazil.  To  restrict  the  type  locality  and  to  clarify  the  identity  of  this  species  I  designate  the 
male  type  specimen  from  Rio  de  Janerio,  Brazil,  and  illustrated  by  Linnavuori  and  DeLong  (1979) 
as  the  Lectotype  of  this  species.  It  will  be  so  labeled. 

Male  gentitalia.  This  species  is  in  a  species  complex  which  has  an  aedeagus  similar  to  A.  niet- 
soni  except  for  the  apex  of  the  shaft,  which  is  bifurcate  (Fig.  1).  This  species  also  has  a  spur-like 
extension  on  the  caudal  margin  of  the  male  pygofer,  and  the  genital  plates  are  curved  and  much 
longer.  The  male  genitalia  (Fig.  1 )  are  not  identical  to  those  illustrated  of  a  male  type  by  Linnavuori 
and  DeLong  (1979),  in  that  the  genital  plate  is  shorter  and  the  process  on  the  pygofer  is  smaller  in 
their  drawing. 

Female  genitalia.  The  female  of  this  species  appears  to  not  have  a  Ungulate  median  process  on 
the  seventh  sternum  and  is  nearly  straight  across.  Another  species  group  of  Agallia  found  in  South 
America  does  have  a  Ungulate  process,  but  these  are  sinuate  in  lateral  view,  and  most  species  of  this 
group  are  undescribed  or  the  female  is  not  associated  with  a  described  male  at  this  time.  Also  in  the 
three  species  described  in  this  paper  the  ligulate  process  is  straight  in  lateral  view,  not  sinuate.  This 
species  is  in  a  species  group  only  found  in  South  America,  which  have  the  aedeagus  of  the  male 
recurved  and  needle-like,  with  the  apex  bifurcate,  with  a  long  genital  plate;  and  the  female  seventh 
sternum  without  a  Ungulate  median  process. 

This  group  includes  the  following  species:  A.  lauta  (Stal)  1862,  A.  t/iuuirata  Oman  1938,  and 
A.  longicauda  Linnavuori  and  DeLong  1979.  The  illustration  of  A.  peregrimins  (Fig.  1 )  would  also 
fit  that  of  A.  lauta  or  A.  quadrata,  so  this  group  needs  to  be  revised  to  verify  these  species  names  and 
to  describe  the  associated  females  which  at  this  time  are  mostly  unknown. 

Note.  The  localities  given  in  the  original  description  of  A.  peregrinans  that  are 
not  from  Brazil  are  surely  wrong,  as  all  specimens  presently  known  of  this 
species  are  from  Brazil. 


Agallia  rotunda,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figures  9- 10) 

Length.  Males  3.6-4  mm.,  females  3.9-4.1  mm.  Similar  to  nielsoni  in  general  appearance,  except 
slightly  larger,  with  larger  male  genitalia  and  female  seventh  sternum. 

Male  genitalia.  Plates  (Fig.  9)  relatively  short,  slightly  exceding  length  of  pygofer.  Pygofer 
rounded  on  apical  margin.  Aedeagus  similar  to  nielxoni  except  larger. 

Female  genitalia.  Seventh  sternum  (Fig.  10)  with  Ungulate  median  process,  longer  then  basal  part 
of  sternum. 


186  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Types.  Holotype  male,  Venezuela,  Trujillo,  near  Mosquey,  1300m,  May  17, 
1985,  on  grasses,  P.  H.  Freytag  and  M.  A.  Giaiani.  Allotype  female  same  data  as 
holotype.  Paratypes:  31  males,  27  females  same  data  as  holotype.  Holotype,  allo- 
type  and  10  male  and  10  female  paratypes  in  the  MIZA  collection,  Maracay,  Ven- 
ezuela. Remainder  of  the  paratypes  in  the  University  of  Kentucky  Collection. 

Notes.  This  species  appears  to  be  associated  with  higher  elavations  of  the 
Andes  Mountains,  and  the  type  locality  is  probably  near  the  Northern  Distribu- 
tion of  this  species.  Other  specimens  are  at  hand  from  the  state  of  Trujillo,  Vene- 
zuela. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

DeLong,  D.  M.  and  J.  S.  Caldwell.  1937.  Check  List  of  the  Cicadellidae  (Homoptera)  of  America, 
North  of  Mexico.  The  Ohio  State  University.  93  pp. 

DeLong,  D.  M.  and  D.  J.  Kiiull.  1945.  Check  List  of  the  Cicadellidae  (Homoptera)  of  America, 
North  of  Mexico.  Graduate  School  Studies.  Ohio  State  Univ.  Press,  Biological  Sciences  Series 
1:1-102. 

Linnavuori,  R.  1956a.  Neotropical  Homoptera  in  the  Hungarian  National  Museum  and  some  other 
European  Museums.  Annales  Entomologici  Fennici  22:5-35. 

Linnavuori,  R.  1 956b.  A  revision  of  some  of  StaTs  and  Spangberg's  Cicadellid  Types.  Annales  En- 
tomologici Fennici  22:170-181. 

Linnavuori,  R.  1968.  Contribucion  d  conocimiento  de  la  Fauna  Colombiana  de  Cicadelidos.  Agri- 
cultura  Tropical  24:147-156. 

Linnavuori,  R.  and  D.  M.  DeLong.  1979.  New  species  of  South  American  Agalliinae  leafhoppers 
(Homoptera:  Cicadellidae).  Entomologica  Scandinavica  10:244-256. 

Nielson,  M.  W.  and  C.  Godoy.  1995.  The  Agalliinae  of  Central  America  (Homoptera:  Ci- 
cadellidae). //;,  Contributions  on  Entomology,  International  1:103-181. 

Oman,  P.  W.  1933.  A  classification  of  North  American  Agallian  Leaf  Hoppers.  United  Sates  De- 
partment of  Agriculture.  Technical  Bulletin  372.  93pp. 

Oman,  P.  W.  1938.  ART.XXII.  A  contribution  to  the  classification  of  South  American  Agallian 
leafhoppers.  Annals  of  the  Carnegie  Museum  25:351-460. 

Oman,  P.  W.  1949.  The  Nearctic  Leafhoppers  (Homoptera:  Cicadellidae).  A  generic  classification 
and  check  list.  Memoirs  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  3:253pp. 

Osborn,  H.  1924.  Neotropical  Homoptera  of  the  Carnegie  Museum.  Parts  3  and  4.  Part  3.  Report 
upon  the  collections  in  the  subfamily  Bythroscopinae,  with  descriptions  of  new  species.  Annales 
of  the  Carnegie  Museum  15:383-396,  plates  LV,  LVI  and  LIX. 

Stal,  C.  1859.  Hemiptera.  Species  novas  descripsit.  Kongliga  avenska  Fregatten  Eugenics  resa 
omkring  jorden  under  befa'l  af  C.  A.  Virgin  aren  1851-1853.  K.  Svenska  Vetenskaps  Akademien 
Zoologi  4:2 19-298. 

Van  Duzee,  E.  P.    1 907.  Notes  on  Jamaican  Hemiptera.  Buffalo  Society  of  Natural  Sciences  8.  97pp. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 187 

NEW  RECORDS  OF  ENCYRTID  PARASITOIDS  OF 

KERMES  PALESTINIENSIS  BALACHOWSKY 

(HEMIPTERA:  KERMESIDAE),  WITH  THE 

DESCRIPTION  OF  A  NEW  SPECIES  OF 

BLASTOTHRIX  MAYR  (HYMENOPTERA: 

ENCYRTIDAE)  FROM  TURKEY1 

George  O.  Japoshvilr  and  Ismail  Karaca' 

ABSTRACT:  A  new  species  of  the  encyrtid  wasp  genus  Blastothrix  Mayr  is  described  from  Turkey. 
All  specimens  of  the  type  series  of  B.  gurselae  n.  sp.  were  reared  from  Kermes palestiniensis  Bala- 
chowsky  on  Turkey  oak,  Quercus  coccifem.  New  records  of  the  parasitoids  of  A',  palestiniensis  in 
Turkey  is  given. 

KEY  WORDS:  Kermes  palestiniensis,  Hemiptera,  Kermesidae,  Blastothrix  gurselae,  Encyrtidae, 
Turkey. 

Chalcid  parasitoids  are  important  in  regulating  the  populations  of  many  insect 
species  (Trjapitzin,  1989).  Some  information  about  beneficial  species  of  Chalci- 
doidea  in  Turkey  is  available  (Doganlar,  1985;  Trjapitzin  and  Doganlar,  1997; 
Japoshvili  and  Karaca,  2002).  However,  such  information  is  missing  for  the  Is- 
parta  Province,  Turkey.  The  objective  of  our  study  was  to  identify  and  catalogue 
parasitoids  within  this  region.  Studies  were  undertaken  from  June  to  October  in 
2001  and  2002  in  different  regions  of  the  Isparta  Province. 

The  terminology  used  in  the  description  of  the  new  species  follows  that  of 
Trjapitzin  (1989),  Noyes  and  Woolley  (1994)  and  Noyes  et  al.  (1997).  Material 
of  the  new  species  was  compared  with  specimens  of  type  material  at  Blastothrix 
erythrostetha  (Walker)  in  the  Francis  Walker  collection  in  Oxford  (HDOU),  also 
with  material  which  was  borrowed  from  the  collection  of  the  Entomology  Re- 
search Museum,  University  of  California,  Riverside,  California,  USA  (UCRC) 
and  St.  Petersburg  Museum  of  Zoology  collections  (ZIN).  Acronyms  for  other 
depositories  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows:  IZGAS,  Institute  of  Zoology, 
Georgian  Academy  of  Sciences,  Tbilisi,  Georgia;  AFSDU,  Agricultural  Faculty, 
Suleyman  Demirel  University,  Isparta,  Turkey;  NHM,  The  Natural  History  Mu- 
seum, London,  UK. 

Abbreviations  used  in  the  text  include:  Fl,  F2,  etc.,  first  funicule  segment, 
second  funicle  segment,  etc.;  FV,  minimum  frontovertex  width;  GL,  maximum 
gonostylus  (=  third  valvula)  length;  HW,  maximum  head  width;  MT,  mid  tibia 


1  Received  on  November  24,  2003.  Accepted  on  March  22.  2004. 

-'Laboratory  of  Invertebrate  Animals  Institute  of  Zoology,  Georgian  Academy  of  Sciences.  Tbilisi, 
Georgia.  E-mail:  giorgij70(a'yahoo.com. 

'Agricultural  Faculty,  Suleyman  Demirel  University,  Isparta,  Turkey.  E-mail:  ikaraca@ziraat.sdu. 
edu.tr. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


1 88  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


length;  OCL,  occipital-ocelar  line  (=  the  shortest  distance  between  each  of  pos- 
terior ocelus  and  occipital  margin);  OL,  ovipositor  length;  OOL,  ocular-ocelar 
line  (=  the  shortest  distance  between  posterior  ocelus  and  adjacent  eye  margin); 
AOL,  distance  between  posterior  and  anterior  ocelli;  POL,  posterior  ocelar  line 
(=  the  shortest  distance  between  the  posterior  ocelli);  SL,  scape  length;  SW,  max- 
imum scape  width. 

Blastothrix  gursela e,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-7) 

Diagnosis.  The  new  species  is  most  closely  related  to  B.  erythrostetha  [lecto- 
type  and  material  deposited  at  the  University  of  California  (Riverside,  CA)  of  B. 
erythrostetha  examined).  Both  species  are  diagnosed  below. 

Blastothrix  erythrostetha.  Female:  Lectotype.  Vertex  about  as  wide  as  1/3  of 
head.  Diameter  of  ocelli  almost  equal  to  distance  between  posterior  ocelli  and 
eye  margin.  Legs  yellow,  only  fore  coxa  slightly  darker  in  the  basal  part  and  tib- 
iae in  the  basal  part  with  a  little  dark  smut.  Unfortunately  on  the  lectotype  anten- 
nae of  it  missing  (Graham,  1969).  Flagellum  Fl  and  F2  dark  and  F3  slightly  dark. 
Clava  equal  or  slightly  longer  than  F5  and  F6  together.  Fl,  F2  -  2.7-3;  F3  -  2-2.2; 
F4  -  1 .5- 1 .7;  F5  -  1 .3- 1 .5;  F6  -  1-1.1  as  long  as  wide.  Fore  tibia  more  then  4  x  as 
long  as  wide.  Ovipositor  longer  than  midtibia. 

Blastothrix  gurselae  sp.n.  Female:  Holotype.  Vertex  about  as  wide  as  1/3.5  of 
head.  Diameter  of  ocelli  2  x  greater  than  distance  between  posterior  ocelli  and 
eye  margin.  All  coxae  dark,  metafemur  dark  with  a  yellow  apical  part,  mesofe- 
mur  dark  in  basal  half,  fore  femora  dark  in  the  middle  and  this  infuscation  sepa- 
rated by  yellow  band  in  length.  All  tibiae  with  infuscation  in  basal  half.  Clava 
slightly  shorter  than  F4,  F5,  and  F6  together.  Fl  -  2;  F2  -  1.6;  F3  -  1.44;  F4  -  1.25; 
F5  -  1.13;  F6  -  0.9  as  long  as  wide.  Foretibia  not  more  then  4  x  as  long  as  wide. 

Ovipositor  shorter  then  midtibia. 

Description  of  Blastothrix  gurselae.  Female.  Length  1.5-2.0  mm,  holotype  1.63.  Body  dark, 
with  some  parts  metallic.  Frontovertex,  pronotum,  mesoscutum.  scutellum.  and  metanotum  with  a 
green-bronze  metallic  luster.  Mesopleuron  dark  yellow.  Gaster  brownish.  Scape  dark  brown,  pedicel 
also  dark  brown,  with  a  pale  apical  part.  Flagellum  with  F1,F2,F3,F4  segments  dark.  Clava  dark 
brown.  Wings  hyaline.  All  coxae  dark.  Hind  and  middle  femora  with  basal  half  dark,  forcfemur  with 
darkness  in  the  middle  and  this  darkness  is  separated  by  yellow  band  in  length.  All  tibiae  in  basal  part 
with  darkness. 

Head  width/height  29:25  and  length/width  13:29.  Vertex  about  as  wide  as  9:29  of  head.  Occipital 
margin  tucked  in.  Inner  orbits  of  eye  slightly  diverging  anteriorly.  Ocelli  in  a  slightly  acute  triangle 
(about  80-85°).  Distance  between  posterior  ocelli  1.5  x  more  than  distance  between  posterior  ocelli 
and  anterior  ocellus.  Diameter  of  ocelli  2  x  greater  than  distance  between  posterior  ocelli  and  eye 
margin.  Distance  between  anterior  ocellus  and  eye  margin  less  than  distance  between  posterior  ocel- 
li (35:30).  Width  of  oral  aperture  about  1/3  head  width.  Malar  space  about  2/3  maximum  height  of 
eye.  Mandible  with  one  tooth  and  a  truncation  (Fig.  5). 

Antenna.  Antenna  inserted  slightly  below  lower  eye  margin.  Distance  between  loruli  2  x  distance 
from  torulus  to  mouth  margin.  Scape  strongly  flattened  (Fig.  1),  1.46  \  longer  then  maximum  width. 
Pedicel  almost  as  long  as  funicle  first  segment.  Fl  -  2  (14:7),  F2  -  1.6  (12:7.5),  F3  -  1.44  (13:9),  F4 
-  1.25  (13:10.5),  F5  -1.13  (13:1 1.5),  F6  -  0.9  (12:13).  Clava  1/2  x  as  broad  as  long,  its  length  slight- 
ly less  than  length  of  F4,  F5,  F6  segments  together  (36:  39). 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003  189 


Mesosoma  very  slightly  convex.  Pronotum  short;  mesoscutum  1.5  x  as  wide  as  long;  scutellum 
1.14  x  as  wide  as  long,  and  slightly  shorter  than  mesoscutum.  Propodeum  very  short  medially  and 
well  developed  laterally. 

Wings  not  reduced,  reaching  apex  of  gaster.  Fore  wing  about  2.5  x  as  long  as  its  maximum  width. 
Costal  cell  7.8  x  as  long  as  wide.  Marginal  vein  (Fig.  7)  equal  to  stigmal  and  both  of  them  almost 
equal  to  postmarginal  vein. 

Gaster  slightly  shorter  than  mesosoma.  Ovipositor  practically  not  exserted.  Pygostiles  inserted 
slightly  at  low  level  of  middle  of  gaster.  Outer  plate  of  ovipositor  2  x  as  long  as  wide  (Fig. 3).  Maxi- 
mum gonostylus  length  of  ovipositor  0.15  x  as  long  as  ovipositor  and  2  x  as  long  as  wide.  Relative 
measurements:  HW  58;  FV  18;  PAL  6,5;  POL  9;  OOL  2;  OCL  4;  MT  56;  OL  47;  GL  7;  SL  29;  SW 
19.5. 

Sculpture  and  pubescence.  Head,  pronotum,  mesoscutum,  scutellum,  metanotum,  mesopleura  and 
sides  of  propodeum  reticulate,  with  white  or  silver  setae. 

Male.  Length  1.25-1.75  mm.  Frontovertex  and  body  as  in  female,  but  all  body  dark  with  a  green 
luster  (without  yellow),  and  with  white  setae.  Fore  coxa  basally,  and  meso-  and  meta-coxae  dark;  tib- 
iae with  infuscation.  Ocelli  in  a  slightly  obtuse  triangle  (almost  110-115°).  Distance  between  poste- 
rior ocelli  2  x  more  than  distance  between  posterior  ocelli  and  anterior  ocellus.  Antenna  (Fig.  2). 
Scape  broadened  and  flattened,  about  2  x  as  long  as  wide.  Pedicel  small,  rounded,  as  long  as  wide. 
Flagellum  with  long  setae;  length  of  Fl:F2:F3:F4:F5:F6:Clava  as  19:20:23:24:21:18:30.  Width  is 
same  for  all  flagellum  and  clava.  Clava  3  x  as  long  as  wide.  Mesoscutum  about  2  x  as  wide  as  long. 
Fore  wing  2.5  x  as  long  as  its  greatest  width.  Genitalia  as  in  Fig.  4. 

Type  Material.  Holotype  female  on  card  labeled:  "Blastothrix  giirselae  Japoshvili  and  Karaca, 
10.VII.2002.  (Sutcular),  Isparta,  Turkey.  Ex  Kermes palestiniensis  Balachowsky  on  Quercus  coc- 
cifera."  Holotype  deposited  in  ZIN.  Paratypes:  same  data  as  holotype,  19  and  icf  on  card  [AFSDU]; 
19  and  Id"  on  card  Natural  History  Museum  Entomology  collection,  London,  UK  [NHM];  29-  ICf 
on  3  cards,  39  and  ICf  on  slides;  as  well  as  99  and  6Cf  in  alcohol  [IZGAS]. 

Etymology.  This  species  is  named  in  honor  of  the  Turkish  mycologist  Dr. 
Gursel  Karaca. 

Geographical  Distribution.  Known  from  Q.  coccifera  forests  in  Isparta 
Province,  Turkey. 

Host.  Kermes  palestiniensis  Balachowsky  (Hemiptera:  Kermesidae). 

Comments.  Like  other  species  of  the  genus,  B.  giirselae  n.  sp.  may  not  be 
monophagous;  its  range  of  probable  Kermes  hosts  in  the  area  of  origin  remains 
to  be  investigated. 

Cheiloneurus  quercus  Mayr,  1876 

Comments.  Known  as  a  secondary  parasitoid  of  Kermes  nakaga\vae  Kuwana 
on  an  oak  in  Primorskiy  Kray  (Russia)  and  also  from  K.  miysakii  Kuwana  and  K. 
nakagawae  (Hemiptera:  Kermesidae)  on  oaks,  and  from  Eulecanium  spp.  (Hem- 
iptera:Coccidae)  in  Japan. 

Geographical  Distribution.  This  species  is  also  known  from  Hungary  and 
Italy  (Trjapitzin,  1989).  It  is  first  recorded  here  from  Turkey. 

Material  examined.  Turkey,  Isparta,  Sutcular.  1 1. VII. 2002,  G.  Japoshvili.  I  9 

Psilophrys  tenuicornis  Graham,  1969 

Comments.  This  species  is  known  as  a  parasitoid  of  Kermes  rohoris  (Four- 
croy),  K.  corticalis  (Nassonov),  K.  bacciformis  Leon,  K.  ilicis  L.  (Kermesidae) 
on  oaks  (Quercus  sppj. 

Geographical  Distribution:  Almost  all  Europe.  This  species  is  recorded  for 
the  first  time  for  the  fauna  of  Turkey. 


190 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figures  1-7.  Blastothrix  gurselae  new  species  1.  Antenna,  female;  2.  Antenna,  male; 
3.  Ovipositor;  4.  Gentalia,  male;  5.  Mandible,  female;  6.  Middle  tarsus,  female;  7.  vena- 
tion of  fore  wing,  female. 


Material  examined.  Turkey,  Adada,  Sutcular,  IO-26.VII.2002,  G.  Japoshvili,  399  4cf. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Dr.  Serguei  V.  Triapitsyn  (University  of  California,  Riverside,  CA)  for  suggesting 
changes  in  the  manuscript  and  for  providing  museum  specimens  of  B.  erythrostetha.  We  would  like 
to  thank  Dr.  Evgeny  S.  Sugonjaev  who  kindly  helped  us  with  the  determination  of  the  new  species 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 191 


as  well  as  Dr.  Ferenc  Kozar  and  Bora  Kaydan  for  the  determination  of  the  host  of  K.  Palestiniensis. 
Thanks  also  to  the  TUBITAK  organization  for  supporting  our  NATO  fellowship  project  "Identifi- 
cation and  determination  of  Parasitic  Hymenoptera  (Chalcidoidea)  of  Isparta  Province,"  Ref:  B.02.1. 
BAK.009.00.00/562/1439. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Graham  M.  W.  R.  de  V.  1969.  Synonimic  and  descriptive  notes  on  European  Encyrtidae  (Hym., 
Chalcidoidea).  Polskie  Pismo  Entomologiczne  T.  39,  fasc.  2:211-319. 

Doganlar  M.  1985.  Notes  on  Chalcidoidea  of  Turkey  III.  Encyrtidae,  Tetracampidae,  Aphelinidae. 
Eulophidae  and  Elasmidae.  Turkiye  Bitki  Koruma  Dergisi  9:91-103. 

Japoshvili  G.  O.  and  I.  N.  Karaca.  2002.  An  annotated  list  of  the  chalcid  (Hymenoptera:  Chalci- 
doidea) parasitoids  of  coccids  (Hemiptera,  Coccoidea)  in  Isparta  Province  (Turkey).  Proceedings 
of  Institirute  of  Zoology,  Tbilisi,  Georgia,  U.S.A.  21:1 73- 1 75. 

Noyes  J.  S.  and  J.  B.  Woolley.  1994.  North  American  encyrtid  fauna  (Hymenoptera:  Encyrtidae): 
taxonomic  changes  and  new  taxa.  Journal  of  Natural  History  28:1327-1401. 

Noyes,  J.  S.,  J.  B.  Woolley,  and  G.  Zolnerowich.  1997.  Chapter  8.  Encyrtidae,  pp.  170-320.  //;, 
Gibson  G.,  Huber  J.,  Woolley  J.  Annotated  key  to  the  genera  of  Nearctic  Chalcidoidea  (Hymen- 
optera). National  Research  Council  of  Canada.  794  pp. 

Trjapitzin  V.  A.  1989.  Parasitic  Hymenoptera  of  the  fam.  Encyrtidae  of  Palearctics.  Leningrad, 
Nauka,  Leningrad  division.  489  pp. 

Trjapitzin  V.  A.  and  M.  Doganlar.  1997.  A  review  of  encyrtids  (Hymenoptera,  Encyrtidae)  of  Tur- 
key. Entomology  Review  7  6(1  ):2 13-222. 


192  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  HOMALOTYLUS 

(HYMENOPTERA:  ENCYRTIDAE)  FROM  MEXICO, 

PARASITOID  OF  AZYA  ORBIGERA  ORBIGERA 

(COLEOPTERA:  COCCINELLIDAE)1 

Vladimir  A.  Trjapitzin2  and  Serguei  V.  Triapitsyn3 


ABSTRACT:  A  new  species  of  the  encyrtid  wasp  genus  Homalotylus  Mayr  is  described  from  the 
state  of  Tamaulipas  in  Mexico.  The  type  series  of//,  shuvakhinac  sp.  n.  was  reared  from  the  coc- 
cinellid  Azva  orbigera  orbigera  (Mulsant),  a  predator  of  the  coccid  Protopulvinaria  pyrifonnis 
(Cockerell).  A  key  to  the  three  related  species  from  ihejlaminius  group  of  Homalotylus  is  provided. 

Key  Words:  Encyrtidae,  Homalotylus,  taxonomy,  Azya  orbigera  orbigera.  parasitoid,  Mexico. 

In  2000,  Elisaveta  Ya.  Shuvakhina  reared  a  series  of  Homalotylus  Mayr  (Hy- 
menoptera:  Encyrtidae)  in  the  garden  of  Hacienda  Santa  Engracia,  an  historic 
hotel  located  near  Ejido  Benito  Juarez,  Municipio  Hidalgo,  Tamaulipas,  Mexico. 
The  adult  parasitoids  emerged  from  larvae  of  the  ladybird  beetle  Azya  orbigera 
orbigera  (Mulsant)  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae)  feeding  upon  the  coccid  Proto- 
pulvinaria pyrifonnis  (Cockerell)  (Hemiptera:  Sternorrhyncha:  Coccidae)  on  an 
undetermined  plant.  These  parasitoids  represent  a  previously  unknown  species  of 
Homalotylus,  which  we  describe  herein  as  H.  shuvakhinae  n.  sp.  This  is  the  first 
known  host  record  of  a  Homalotylus  from  the  coccinellid  genus  Azya  Mulsant. 

Terms  for  morphological  features  are  those  of  Gibson  (1997).  Acronyms  for 
depositories  of  specimens  are  as  follows:  BMNH,  The  Natural  History  Museum, 
London,  England,  UK;  EMUT,  Entomological  Museum,  Centre  de  Investi- 
gacion,  U.A.M.  Agronomia  y  Ciencias,  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Tamaulipas, 
Ciudad  Victoria,  Tamaulipas,  Mexico;  UCRC,  Entomology  Research  Museum, 
University  of  California,  Riverside,  California,  USA;  USNM,  National  Museum 
of  Natural  History,  Washington,  D.C.,  USA;  ZISP,  Zoological  Institute,  Russian 
Academy  of  Sciences,  St.  Petersburg,  Russia.  An  abbreviation  used  in  the  text  is: 
F  =  antennal  funicle  segment. 

Genus  Homalotylus  Mayr,  1876 

Type  species:  Encyrtus  flaminius  Dalman,  1820;  by  subsequent  designation  by 
Ashmead  (1900).  Synonyms:  Nobrimus  Thomson,  1876;  Mendozaniella  Brethes, 
1913;  Hemaenasioidea  Girault,  1916;  Anisotylus  Timberlake,  1919;  Lepidap- 
hvcus  E.  Blanchard,  1936;  Neoaenasioidea  Agarwal,  1966. 


1  Received  February  25,  2003.  Accepted  March  13,  2004. 

-Centre  de  Investigacion,  U.A.M.  Agronomia  y  Ciencias,  Universidad  Autonoma  de  Tamaulipas. 
Ciudad  Victoria,  Tamaulipas  87149,  Mexico.  E-mail:  vatrjapitzin(«  yahoo.com. 

1  Entomology  Research  Museum,  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  California,  Riverside, 
California  9252 1 ,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  serguei.triapitsyn@ucr.edu. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 193 

Taxonomy.  Homalotylus  is  a  well-known  genus  and  its  generic  diagnosis  is 
available  elsewhere  (Timberlake  1919).  Depending  on  the  classification,  the 
genus  Homalotylus  is  placed  either  in  the  tribe  Homalotylini,  subtribe  Homalot- 
ylina  (Trjapitzin  1973,  1989)  or  the  tribe  Aphycini  (Anis  and  Hayat  1998)  of  the 
subfamily  Encyrtinae.  The  senior  author  does  not  agree,  however,  with  Anis  and 
Hayat's  (1998)  synonymy  of  Homalotylini  under  Aphycini  because  these  seem 
to  be  two  very  different  evolutionary  lines  of  Encyrtinae,  infesting  basically  dif- 
ferent groups  of  hosts:  Homalotylini  parasitize  active  larvae  of  Coccinellidae  and 
Chrysopidae  whereas  Aphycini  attack  more  or  less  sedentary  Pseudococcidae, 
and  their  respective  oviposition  behaviors  are  completely  different. 

The  new  taxon  described  herein  belongs  to  the  flaminius  species  group  of 
Homalotylus  as  defined  by  Timberlake  (1919).  In  this  group  of  species,  the 
ovipositor  is  not  exserted  and  hardly  visible  except  in  distorted  specimens,  or 
only  slightly  exserted.  Homalotylus  shuvakhinae  sp.  n.  clearly  belongs  to  the 
subgroup  of  the  flaminius  species  group  in  which  the  head  is  notably  higher  than 
wide  in  frontal  view.  The  new  species  from  Mexico  is  closely  related  to 
H.  flaminius  (Dalman)  and  H.  eytelweinii  (Ratzeburg)  in  having  the  ocellar  tri- 
angle distinctly  acute.  These  three  species  can  be  distinguished  from  each  other 
using  the  following  key. 

Key  to  species  of  Homalotylus  related  to  H.  shuvakhinae  sp.  n.,  females. 

1  First  and  third  segments  of  metatarsus  white H.  flaminius  (Dalman) 

or        All  segments  of  metatarsus  black  or  dusky 2 

2  Tegula  with  a  white  base.  Mesotarsus  white  (except  distal  segment  dusky) 

H.  eytelweinii  (Ratzeburg) 

or       Tegula  entirely  black.  Mesotarsus  with  basal  segment  black,  second  to 

fourth  segments  light,  and  distal  segment  dusky H.  shuvakhinae.  sp.  n. 

Biology.  Primary  parasitoids  of  larvae  and  pupae  of  various  Coccinellidae. 
Trjapitzin  and  Ruiz  Cancino  (1998,  2001 )  indicated  host  associations  of  the  two 
species  of  Homalotylus  from  Mexico,  both  of  which  are  unrelated  to  the  new 
taxon  described  in  this  communication. 

Homalotylus  flaminius  in  Europe  and  Asia  parasitizes  coccinellids  of  the  tribe 
Scymnini  (Klausnitzer  &  Klausnitzer  1972,  Klausnitzer,  1976).  According  to  the 
determined  specimens  in  ZISP  and  also  Noyes  (2002),  H.  flaminius  is  known 
from  Bulgaria,  Georgia,  Israel,  Mongolia,  Russia,  Spain,  Sweden,  and  Uzbekis- 
tan. 

Homalotylus  eytelweinii  parasitizes  coccinellids  of  the  tribes  Chilocorini, 
Coccinellini,  Hippodamiini  and  Psylloborini  (Klausnitzer  &  Klausnitzer  1972, 
Klausnitzer,  1976).  According  to  the  determined  specimens  in  ZISP  and  also 
Noyes  (2002),  it  is  known  from  many  countries  in  the  Palaearctic  region  (from 
Spain  to  Japan)  as  well  as  from  India  and  Thailand  in  the  Oriental  region.  Repub- 
lic of  South  Africa  in  the  Afrotropical  region,  and  Guatemala  in  the  Neotropical 
region. 


194  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Homalotylus  shuvakhinae  sp.  n.,  described  below,  is  known  only  from  the  type 
locality  in  Tamaulipas,  Mexico.  Its  host,  Azya  orbigera  orbigera,  belongs  to  the 
tribe  Azyini  of  the  subfamily  Coccinellinae;  distribution  records  of  this  species 
in  the  USA  are  all  from  southern  Florida  (Gordon  1985). 

Homalotylus  shuvakhinae  V.  Trjapitzin  and  S.  Triapitsyn,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-3) 

Diagnosis.  See  the  key  and  comments  above. 

Female.  Length  1.84-2.03  mm  (holotype  1.84  mm).  Color.  Body  black,  with  slight  metallic  shine. 
Frontovertex  with  faint  bronze  luster.  Antenna  black  except  F6  and  clava  yellowish-white  (apical  half 
of  F5  sometimes  whitish).  Mesonotum  with  slight  violet-bronze-greenish  luster;  mesopleura  with 
similar,  but  fainter,  luster.  Tegula  entirely  black.  Forewing  with  transverse  dark  band  reaching  poste- 
rior margin.  Legs  mostly  black,  including  mesotibial  spur  (except  in  one  paratype  where  it  is  brown- 
ish white);  mesotarsus  with  apex  of  first  segment  more  or  less  light,  second  to  fourth  segments  light 
(yellowish  or  brownish),  and  fifth  segment  dusky. 

Head  about  1.2  x  higher  than  wide.  Frontovertex  narrow;  vertex  1/4  to  1/5  head  width.  Ocelli  in 
slightly  acute  triangle  (somewhat  less  than  60co).  Distance  between  posterior  ocelli  less  than  distance 
between  posterior  ocelli  to  anterior  ocellus  (4/5  to  5/6);  distance  from  posterior  ocellus  to  eye  mar- 
gin 2  x  (or  a  little  less)  more  than  distance  between  posterior  ocelli.  Occipital  margin  slightly  con- 
cave. Malar  space  height  less  than  eye  height  (as  3-4:7).  Distance  between  lower  eye  margin  3  x  more 
than  width  of  vertex.  Inner  head  margin  almost  straight  (or  only  slightly  convex). 

Antenna  (Fig.  1)  inserted  near  oral  margin.  Scape  slender,  almost  8  x  as  long  as  wide.  Pedicel 
about  1/3  length  of  scape,  2  x  as  long  as  wide.  Fl  slightly  longer  than  wide,  about  half  length  of  pedi- 
cel; F2  and  F3  similar  to  Fl;  F4  slightly  wider  than  preceding  funicle  segments;  F5  subquadrate;  F6 
a  little  wider  than  long.  Clava  3-segmented,  about  as  long  as  combined  length  of  3  preceding  flagel- 
lar  segments,  obliquely  truncate  dorsally  almost  from  the  base  of  first  claval  segment. 

Mesosoma.  Pronotum  short,  7  x  wider  than  long  medially,  its  posterior  margin  concave.  Mesoscu- 
tum  1.3-1.7  x  as  wide  as  long;  notauli  not  reaching  posterior  margin  of  mesoscutum,  with  apices  very 
close  to  each  other  but  not  meeting.  Posterolateral  angle  of  axilla  transversely  truncate  and  divided 
by  short,  thin  keel.  Scutellum  about  as  long  as  wide  and  about  as  long  as  mesoscutum.  Propodeum 
very  short  medially,  4-5  x  shorter  than  scutellum;  posterior  part  of  propodeum  strongly  concave 
medially  and  acute  laterally  (in  dorsal  view). 

Wings  not  abbreviated.  Forewing  (Fig.  2)  2.6-2.7  x  as  long  as  its  maximum  width.  Costal  cell  nar- 
row. Venation  as  in  Fig.  3;  marginal  vein  about  1.5  x  as  long  as  wide;  stigmal  vein  almost  straight, 
not  strongly  widening  towards  its  rounded  apex;  postmarginal  vein  about  as  long  as  stigmal  vein, 
angle  between  them  about  30*.  Linea  calva  narrow,  7  x  as  long  as  wide,  not  exceeding  limits  of  dark 
band,  closed  beneath  by  6  discal  setae. 

Metasoma  about  as  long  as  mesosoma.  Ovipositor  either  not  exserted  or  only  slightly  exserted 
beyond  apex  of  gaster.  Pygostyles  at  level  of  2/7  length  of  gaster  (from  its  apex). 

Sculpture.  Frontovertex,  mesopleura,  and  propodeum  with  microcellulate  sculpture.  Mesonotum 
minutely  reticulate;  scutellum  microcellulate,  almost  matte. 

Male.  Unknown. 

Type  material:  Holotype  female  on  card,  labeled:  1.  "MEXICO,  Tain.,  Cd.  Victoria:  Sta. 
Engracia.  Jardin  del  hotel,  14.11.2000  (E.  Ya.  Chouvakhina)";  2.  "Ex.  A:ya  orbigera  orbigera 
Mulsant  en  Protopulvinaria  pyriformis"',  3.  "Homalotylus  shuvakhinae  Trjapitzin  &  S.  Triapitsyn 
HOLOTYPE  9  Holotype  deposited  in  ZISP.  Paratypes:  same  data  as  holotype,  5  females  on  cards 
[BMNH,  EMUT,  UCRC,  USNM,  and  ZISP]  and  1  female  on  slide  [UCRC]. 

Etymology.  This  species  is  named  after  the  collector,  Mrs.  Elisaveta  Yakov- 
levna  Shuvakhina  (Chouvakhina),  the  wife  and  mother  of  the  senior  and  junior 
authors,  respectively. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


195 


>t 


8&L-v 


"  '-vXvVU^'ixN;   "^S?^?>c^," 

'%. 

•    .   •     :>&:-01 

'  •  ^  •  '  • :  :*yHV.^ 


Figures  1-3.  Homalotylus  shuvakhinae,  new  species  (female).  ( 1 )  Antenna;  (2)  Forewing; 
(3)  Forewing  venation. 


196  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Elisaveta  Ya.  Shuvakhina  (Russian  Entomological  Society,  Moscow,  Russia)  for  col- 
lecting the  specimens,  Larry  G.  Bezark  (California  Department  of  Food  and  Agriculture,  Sacramento, 
California,  USA)  for  identifying  the  host  coccinellid,  and  also  Valentin  P.  Semjanov  (ZISP)  and  John 
S.  Noyes  (BMNH)  for  valuable  assistance.  Douglas  Yanega  (UCRC)  and  Svetlana  N.  Myartseva 
(EMUT)  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  prior  to  its  submission.  Vladimir  V.  Berezovskiy  (UCRC) 
dissected  and  slide-mounted  in  Canada  balsam  one  of  the  paratypes  of  the  new  species  and  Jung- 
Wook  Kim  (UCRC)  made  digital  photographs  from  that  slide  using  the  AutoMontage  system. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Anis,  S.  B.  and  M.  Hayat.  1998.  The  Indian  species  of  Homalotylus  (Hymenoptera:  Encyrtidae). 
Oriental  Insects  32:191-218. 

Ashmead,  W.  H.  1900.  On  the  genera  of  chalcid-flies  belonging  to  the  subfamily  Encyrtinae. 
Proceedings  of  the  U.  S.  National  Museum  22  (1202):323-412. 

Gibson,  G.  A.  P.  1997.  Chapter  2.  Morphology  and  terminology,  pp.  16-44.  In,  G.A.P.  Gibson,  J.T. 
Huber  and  J.  B.  Woolley  (Editors).  Annotated  keys  to  the  genera  of  Nearctic  Chalcidoidea 
(Hymenoptera).  NRC  Research  Press.  Ottawa,  Ontario,  Canada.  794  pp. 

Gordon,  R.  D.  1985.  The  Coccinellidae  (Coleoptera)  of  America  north  of  Mexico.  Journal  of  the 
New  York  Entomological  Society  93  (1):  1-9 12. 

Klausnitzer,  B.  1976.  Katalog  der  Entomoparasiten  der  mitteleuropaischen  Coccinellidae  (Col.). 
Studia  Entomologica  Forestalia  (Praha)  2(7):121-130. 

Klausnitzer,  B.  and  H.  Klausnitzer.  1972.  Marienkafer  (Coccinellidae).  Die  Neue  Brehm- 
Biicherei.  A.  Ziemsen  Verlag,  Wittenberg  Lutherstadt.  88  pp. 

Noyes,  J.  S.  2002.  Interactive  catalogue  of  world  Chalcidoidea  2001.  The  Natural  History  Museum, 
Taxapad  2002,  CD-ROM. 

Timberlake,  P.  H.  1919.  Revision  of  the  parasitic  chalcidoid  flies  of  the  genera  Homalotylus  Mayr 
and  Isodromus  Howard,  with  descriptions  of  two  closely  related  genera.  Proceedings  of  the  U.  S. 
National  Museum  56  (2293):  133- 194. 

Trjapitzin,  V.  A.  1973.  [Classification  of  the  parasitic  Hymenoptera  of  the  family  Encyrtidae  (Chal- 
cidoidea). Part  11.  Subfamily  Encyrtinae  Walker,  1837].  Entomologicheskoye  Obozreniye 
52(2):416-429.  [In  Russian].  English  translation:  Entomological  Review  52  (2):  287-295. 

Trjapitzin,  V.  A.  1989.  [Parasitic  Hymenoptera  of  the  fam.  Encyrtidae  of  Palaearctics].  Nauka, 
Leningrad  Division,  Leningrad.  488  pp.  [In  Russian]. 

Trjapitzin,  V.  A.  and  E.  Ruiz  Cancino.  1998.  Homalotylus  terminalis  (Say)  (Hymenoptera:  Chal- 
cidoidea: Encyrtidae),  un  parasitoide  de  coccinelidos  (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae)  en  el  Estado  de 
Morelos,  Mexico.  CEIBA  38:157-160. 

Trjapitzin,  V.  A.  and  E.  Ruiz  Cancino.  2001.  Homalotylus  cockerelli  Timberlake  (Hymenoptera: 
Encyrtidae)  in  Mexico.  Southwestern  Entomologist  26(4):377-378. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 197 

TERRITORIALLY  AND  SINGING-SITE  PREFERENCES 
IN  THE  CRICKET,  CYPHODERRIS  MONSTROSA 

(ORTHOPTERA:  HAGLIDAE) 
IN  WESTERN  NORTH  AMERICA1 

J.  Ladau' 

ABSTRACT:  Many  male  orthopterans  prefer  to  stridulate  from  certain  microhabitats.  However,  it 
is  unknown  if  such  preferences  exist  in  Cyphoderris  monstrosa  Uhler  (Haglidae).  Choice  tests  indi- 
cated that  C.  monstrosa  strongly  prefer  to  sing  from  large  trees  and  clumps  of  trees,  but  a  survey  of 
singing  C.  monstrosa  suggested  indifference  to  tree  species.  The  observed  preferences  may  have 
implications  for  understanding  the  evolution  of  territoriality  in  C.  monstrosa. 

KEY  WORDS:  Orthoptera,  Haglidae,  Cricket,  stridulate,  conifer,  habitat  preference,  territoriality. 
western  North  America. 

The  haglid  crickets  are  represented  in  Western  North  America  by  three 
species:  Cyphoderris  monstrosa  in  the  Cascade  and  northern  Rocky  Mountains, 
C.  strepitans  in  the  central  Rocky  Mountains,  and  C.  buckelli  in  the  Canadian 
Rocky  Mountains  (Morris  and  Gwynne  1978).  Males  of  all  three  species  sing  at 
approximately  1 3kHz  with  essentially  the  same  pulse  rate,  pulse  duration,  and 
amplitude  (Morris  and  Gwynne  1978).  However,  two  of  the  three  species  com- 
municate differently  with  their  songs:  C.  strepitans  use  song  to  attract  mates 
(Dodson  et  al.  1983,  Snedden  and  Irazuzta  1994)  while  C.  monstrosa  use  song  to 
mediate  territorial  disputes  (knowledge  of  C.  buckelli  is  lacking;  Sakaluk  et  al. 
1995,  Mason  1996). 

In  C.  monstrosa,  territorial  disputes  can  escalate  from  singing  to  biting  and 
kicking  matches  (Mason,  1996),  but  physical  aggression  is  absent  in  C.  strepi- 
tans and  C.  buckelli.  That  difference  in  aggressiveness  is  puzzling  -  why  aren't 
all  three  species  alike?  Mason  (1996)  and  Sakaluk  et  al  (1995)  suggest  that  the 
answer  may  lie  in  habitat  geometry.  Male  C.  monstrosa  sing  from  the  branches 
and  trunks  of  conifer  trees,  while  male  C.  strepitans  and  male  C.  buckelli  sing 
from  bushes  (Morris  and  Gwynne  1978).  Since  bushes  are  shorter  than  conifer 
trees  and  have  denser  branches,  the  cost  of  defending  a  territory  in  a  bush  may 
be  relatively  high,  making  territoriality  disadvantageous  for  C.  strepitans  and  C. 
buckelli  but  not  C.  monstrosa  (Mason  1996,  Sakaluk  et  al.  1995). 

However,  rather  than  a  high  cost,  defending  a  territory  in  a  bush  may  entail 
only  a  small  benefit  in  comparison  with  defending  a  territory  in  a  tree.  All  bush- 
es could  be  roughly  equivalent,  while  a  limited  number  of  conifers  could  offer 
the  best  protection,  food,  or  access  to  females.  Cyphoderris  monstrosa  may  de- 
fend territories  not  because  it  is  relatively  "cheap,"  but  because  it  is  relatively 
beneficial. 


'  Received  on  August  24,  2002.  Accepted  on  March  13,  2004. 

;  Department  of  Neurobiology  and  Behavior,  W347  Seeley  G.  Mudd  Hall,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca. 
NY  14853-2702,  U.S.A.   E-mail:  jll72@comell.edu. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


198  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


According  to  the  latter  benefits  hypothesis,  territorial ity  and  environmental 
heterogeneity  should  correlate:  When  sites  are  of  differing  quality,  territoriality 
should  be  present,  while  when  they  are  of  equivalent  quality,  it  should  be  absent. 
Suggesting  that  sites  are  indeed  equivalent  in  the  absence  of  territoriality,  C. 
buckelli  sing  from  randomly  chosen  bushes  (Morris  et  al.  2002).  However, 
whether  C.  monstrosa  prefer  to  sing  from  particular  trees  is  unknown.  The  aim 
here  is  to  answer  this  question,  specifically  by  investigating  if  C.  monstrosa  pre- 
fer to  sing  from  any  particular  species  of  tree,  size  of  trees,  or  size  of  tree  clumps 
in  meadows. 

METHODS 

Field  Site 

All  experiments  were  conducted  at  the  headwaters  of  Snow  Creek  in  the  Three 
Sisters  Wilderness  of  the  Cascade  Mountains  (U.S.A.,  Oregon;  121°40'5.4"W,  44° 
6'4.5"N).  The  elevation  of  the  site  ranged  from  2133  to  2225  m. 

For  experiments,  "large"  and  "small"  trees  were  defined  based  on  their  cir- 
cumference and  height  (Large  Trees:  circumference  at  1  m  =  1 .74  ±  0.87  m;  height 
=  15.79  ±  6.63  m;  Small  Trees:  circumference  at  1  m  =  0.19  ±  0.084  m;  height  = 
2.38  ±  0.72  m).  Likewise,  "large"  and  "small"  tree  clumps  were  defined  based  on 
the  number  of  trees  that  they  contained  and  the  maximum  height  of  their  trees 
(Large  Clumps:  number  of  trunks  =  24  ±  15;  maximum  height  ==  13.8  ±  3.5  m; 
Small  Clumps:  number  of  trunks  =  5  ±  6.8;  maximum  height  =  5.3  ±  2.1  m). 

Crickets  for  experiments  were  collected  from  trees  and  tree  clumps  not  used 
in  trials.  While  in  captivity,  each  cricket  consumed  apple,  carrot,  and  staminate 
pinecones  (Mason  1991,  Snedden  and  Irazuzta  1994),  and  each  one's  pronotum, 
hind  knees,  and  abdominal  tergites  VII  and  VIII  were  coated  with  fluorescent  or 
phosphorescent  paint  (Liquitex  No.  2002-981,  Liquitex  No.  20002-982,  and 
Golden  Phosphorescent  Medium). 

Tree  Clump  Preferences 

These  trials  tested  if  male  C.  monstrosa  prefer  to  sing  from  large  or  small  tree 
clumps.  Each  trial  occurred  in  one  of  five  circular  arenas  (Fig.  1 ).  At  the  center 
of  each  arena,  crickets  acclimated  in  a  container  for  2  hours  before  each  trial 
began.  Crickets  were  then  released  between  2000  and  2015  hours  and  observed 
every  5  minutes  under  red  light,  or  when  missing,  under  ultraviolet  light.  As  a 
cricket  crossed  the  perimeter  of  an  arena,  its  location  and  the  temperature  on  the 
ground  were  recorded.  Each  cricket  was  used  only  once. 

The  direction  from  the  center  of  a  given  arena  to  its  tree  clumps  was  oriented 
randomly  to  control  for  the  possibility  that  C.  monstrosa  may  have  tended  to 
walk  in  a  particular  compass  direction.  In  addition,  interactions  between  tree  size 
and  tree  species  were  accounted  for  by  creating  two  arenas  between  clumps  of 
Tsuga  mertensiana  and  three  arenas  between  clumps  of  mixed  Abies/Pinus  spp. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 199 


Figure  1.  An  arena  as  seen  from  above.  Abbreviations  are  as  follows:  S,  small  tree  or  tree 
clump;  L,  large  tree  or  tree  clump;  P,  perimeter  of  arena.  The  perimeter  touched  each 
clump  or  tree  tangentially  and  was  marked  on  the  ground  with  string  tied  to  garden  stakes. 
This  string  did  not  impede  crickets  from  walking  out  of  the  arena.  The  mean  diameters 
of  arenas  were  2.48  ±  0.9m  and  1.25  ±  0.4m  in  Tree  Clump  Choice  Tests  and  Tree  Size 
Choice  Tests,  respectively. 


Tree  Size  Preferences 

The  aim  of  these  trials  was  to  test  if  C.  monstrosa  prefer  to  sing  from  large  or 
small  trees.  Trials  were  performed  in  four  arenas,  and  followed  the  same  proto- 
col as  for  tree  clumps  except  crickets  acclimated  for  45-60  minutes  rather  than  2 
hours.  In  addition,  if  a  cricket  exited  an  arena  unobserved,  it  was  assumed  to 
have  followed  a  linear  course  from  its  last  known  location.  To  account  for  the 
corresponding  loss  of  precision,  these  estimated  locations  were  recorded  in  30° 
increments.  Finally,  while  only  one  cricket  occupied  an  arena  at  a  time,  up  to 
three  were  released  into  each  arena  per  night,  beginning  at  between  2100  and 
2115  hours  and  ending  by  2400  hours.  Each  cricket  was  used  only  once. 

One  variable  that  may  interact  with  tree  size  is  tree  species.  Hence,  arenas 
were  situated  so  that  half  were  between  pairs  of  Pinus  trees  and  half  were  be- 
tween pairs  of  Tsuga  mertensiana  trees.  As  in  the  tree  clump  experiments,  the 
directions  to  the  large  and  small  trees  differed  for  each  arena. 

Tree  Species  Preferences 

To  determine  if  C.  monstrosa  prefer  to  sing  from  a  particular  species  of  tree, 
logistical  constraints  precluded  choice  tests.  However,  surveying  singing  crick- 
ets was  possible.  To  generate  a  null  model  for  the  survey,  the  relative  abundance 
of  Pinus  sp.,  Abies  sp.,  and  Tsuga  sp.  was  determined  within  the  tree  clumps  that 
crickets  sang,  or  within  a  25  m:  quadrate  in  the  forest. 

Analysis 

To  test  if  crickets  preferred  large  trees  and  tree  clumps,  two  alternatives  are 
considered:  crickets  followed  a  random  walk  (implying  that  the  proportion  of  the 
perimeter  of  the  arena  that  a  large  tree/clump  occupied  predicted  the  number  of 


200  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


crickets  that  chose  it)  or  they  distinguished  between  meadow,  large  trees/clumps, 
and  small  trees/clumps,  but  had  no  preference  (i.e.,  they  chose  each  location  one 
third  of  the  time).  A  binomial  test  -  with  the  number  of  crickets  expected  at  large 
and  small  trees/clumps  grouped  together  -  -  was  used  to  test  the  first  null  hypo- 
thesis because  fewer  than  five  crickets  were  expected  to  choose  trees/  clumps  (Zar 
1996).  A  G-test  was  used  for  the  second  set  of  alternatives. 

It  is  possible  that  crickets  walked  in  a  compass  direction  that  they  preferred  and 
then  merely  "bumped"  into  certain  trees/clumps.  If  there  was  such  a  directional 
preference,  the  mean  directions  in  which  crickets  exited  each  arena  would  be  iden- 
tical, which  is  testable  with  a  Watson- Williams  Test  (used  for  tree  clump  data;  Zar 
1996).  However,  this  test  cannot  be  used  for  the  data  from  the  Tree  Size  Choice 
Tests  because  they  were  grouped  in  30°  increments  (Zar  1996).  To  circumvent  the 
problem,  consider  that  if  crickets  chose  a  compass  direction,  half  of  them  from 
each  arena  would  have  chosen  to  go  to  either  side  of  the  median  direction  for  all 
of  the  exits  from  all  of  the  arenas,  a  hypothesis  testable  with  a  G-test  (Batschelet 
1981). 

All  means  are  reported  plus  or  minus  one  standard  deviation  (mean  ±  SD). 

RESULTS 
Tree  Clumps  Preferences 

Surveys  suggested  that  singing  crickets  were  more  abundant  in  large  tree 
clumps  than  small  tree  clumps.  In  trials,  most  crickets  walked  directly  to  the  large 
or  small  tree  clump.  Cyphoderris  monstrosa  that  initially  began  walking  towards 
the  small  tree  clump  usually  reversed  direction  before  they  were  halfway  there 
(n=3).  Ultimately,  of  the  25  crickets  that  exited  arenas,  23  (92  percent)  went  to 
large  clumps,  1  (4  percent)  went  to  meadow,  and  1  (4  percent)  went  to  a  small 
clump.  Crickets  chose  tree  clumps  more  often  than  is  expected  had  they  followed 
a  random  walk  (Fig.  2a;  binomial  test,  p«0.001).  They  therefore  appear  to  have 
chosen  the  tree  clumps  prior  to  leaving  the  arena.  A  test  of  whether  their  decision 
was  random  with  respect  to  clump  size  indicates  that  it  was  not;  large  tree  clumps 
were  preferred  (G-test,  G=38.219,  p«0.001).  Cyphoderris  monstrosa  moreover 
tended  to  exit  arenas  at  the  center  of  large  tree  clumps  (x:  goodness  of  fit  test: 
X:=13.272,  p<0.001 ).  Those  that  were  permitted  to  continue  into  tree  clumps  com- 
menced singing  within  five  minutes  of  climbing  trees  therein  if  the  ambient  tem- 
perature exceeded  4°C. 

The  mean  compass  directions  in  which  crickets  exited  each  arena  differed 
(Watson- Williams  test:  F=38.503,  p<0.0005;  Zar  1996).  This  heterogeneity  indi- 
cates that  the  locations  at  which  C.  monstrosa  exited  did  not  result  entirely  from  a 
certain  compass  direction  being  preferred. 

The  preference  of  C.  monstrosa  for  large  tree  clumps  was  independent  of  ambi- 
ent temperature  (Fisher's  Exact  Test:  p=0.708).  However,  at  low  temperatures 
crickets  exited  arenas  less  frequently  than  at  high  temperatures,  burrowing  or  be- 
coming inactive  immediately  upon  entering  the  arena  (Fisher's  Exact  Test:  p<0.00 1 ). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


201 


Meadow       Small  Clumps  Large  Clumps 


Small  Trees          Neither          Large  Trees 


Figure  2.  Number  of  crickets  choosing  (a)  large  clumps,  small  clumps,  and  meadow  and 
(b)  large  trees,  small  trees,  and  neither.  Expectations  are  calculated  from  the  proportion 
of  the  perimeter  of  the  arena  that  tree  clumps  or  trees  occupied. 

Cyphoderris  monstrosa  chose  large  Tsuga  clumps  as  often  as  they  chose  large 
Abies-Pinus  clumps  (Fisher's  Exact  Test:  p>0.3),  suggesting  that  their  preference 
for  large  tree  clumps  was  unaffected  by  the  species  of  trees  growing  in  them. 

Tree  Size  Preferences 

Surveys  suggested  that  singing  crickets  were  more  abundant  in  large  trees  than 
small  trees.  In  trials,  most  C.  monstrosa  walked  directly  to  the  large  tree,  small 
tree,  or  a  tree  that  was  located  outside  of  the  arena.  All  told,  16  (48  percent)  crick- 
ets chose  to  sing  in  large  trees,  5(15  percent)  in  small  trees,  and  12  (36  percent) 
chose  neither,  usually  walking  to  a  more  distant,  foreign  tree.  More  crickets 
chose  large  trees  than  can  be  explained  by  the  proportion  of  the  perimeter  that 
large  trees  occupied  (Fig.  2b;  Binomial  test:  p«0.001).  The  responses  of  the 
crickets  also  did  not  conform  to  the  pattern  that  was  expected  if  they  distin- 
guished between  large  trees,  small  trees,  and  meadow  but  were  not  predisposed 
to  choose  any  of  the  three  (G-test:  6.194,  p<0.05).  When  crickets  chose  a  tree, 
they  climbed  it  and  began  stridulating. 

Crickets  walked  in  different  compass  directions  in  each  arena  (G-test: 
G=4.321,  p<0.05;  Batschelet  1981).  Therefore,  preference  for  large  trees  proba- 
bly did  not  result  spuriously  from  crickets  choosing  to  walk  in  a  compass  direc- 
tion that  they  preferred.  Furthermore,  the  preference  for  large  trees  was  inde- 
pendent of  the  genus  of  the  trees  (G-test:  G=0.279,  p>0.5). 

Tree  Species  Preferences 

The  14  tree  clumps  surveyed  with  singing  C  monstrosa  were  composed  of  7 
Abies  spp.,  160  Tsuga  mertensiana,  and  92  Finns  spp.  Within  eleven  5  x  5  m 
quadrates  centered  on  stridulating  crickets  grew  18  Finns  spp.,  57  Tsuga  merten- 
siana, and  35  Abies  spp. 


202 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  total  of  1 2  C.  monstrosa  stridulating  in  the  forest  and  1 8  in  tree  clumps  were 
surveyed.  In  both  the  forest  and  tree  clumps,  the  crickets  were  distributed  ran- 
domly amongst  the  3  genera  of  trees  (clumps:  Fig.  3a;  G-test:  G=0.004,  p>0.95; 
forest:  Fig.  3b;  G-test:  G=0.447,  p>0.25).  Whether  crickets  inhabited  forest  or 
tree  clumps  did  not  predict  the  tree  genus  from  which  they  called  (G-test: 
G=0.0892,  p>0.75). 


3 
a4 


12.5 


Tsuga  Pinus  Abies 

Singing  Location 


Tsuga  Pinus 

Singing  Loc  ahon 


Abies 


Figure  3.  The  number  of  C.  monstrosa  observed  and  expected  (if  crickets  do  not  prefer 
any  tree  genus)  to  be  singing  from  Abies,  Tsuga,  and  Pinus  trees  in  (a)  tree  clumps  and 
(b)  forest. 


DISCUSSION 

This  investigation  suggests  that  male  C.  monstrosa  prefer  to  sing  in  large  tree 
clumps,  independent  of  the  ambient  temperature  and  local  tree  species.  It  also 
suggests  that  the  crickets  prefer  large  trees  regardless  of  genus,  and  that  they  sing 
equally  often  from  P.  contorta,  P.  albicaulis,  Abies  spp.,  and  T.  mertensiana. 

Natural  selection  is  generally  modeled  as  a  balance  between  costs  and  bene- 
fits: selection  favors  traits  only  if  their  benefits  exceed  their  costs  (Parker  and 
Maynard  Smith  1990).  This  line  of  reasoning  implies  that  the  benefits  of  territo- 
riality  must  exceed  the  costs  in  C.  monstrosa  but  not  in  C.  strepitans  and  C.  buck- 
elli.  Such  a  difference  may  arise  in  two  ways:  First,  territoriality  may  cost  C. 
monstrosa  more  than  it  costs  C.  buckelli  and  C.  strepitans  (Sakaluk  et  al.  1995, 
Mason  1996),  and  second,  territoriality  may  benefit  C.  monstrosa  more  than  it 
benefits  C.  strepitans  and  C.  buckelli.  While  these  two  possibilities  are  not 
mutually  exclusive,  they  are  distinct,  and  my  results  support  the  second  one. 

Specifically,  I  hypothesized  that  a  limited  number  of  sites  offer  C.  monstrosa 
the  best  protection,  food,  and/or  access  to  females,  while  for  C.  strepitans  C. 
buckelli,  such  sites  are  either  unlimited  or  nonexistent.  This  hypothesis  predicts 
that  C.  monstrosa  should  prefer  to  sing  from  particular  sites  -  those  with  the 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 203 

best  resources  --  and  consistent  with  this  prediction,  I  have  shown  that  C.  mon- 
strosa  indeed  prefer  to  sing  from  large  trees  and  large  tree  clumps. 

Whether  large  trees  and  tree  clumps  offer  the  best  resources  remains  to  be  test- 
ed. However,  I  speculate  that  they  might  for  the  following  reasons: 

1 .  Preliminary  data  suggest  that  females  abound  in  large  trees  and  tree  clumps 
(Ladau,  personal  observation).  If  females  prefer  to  mate  with  males  that  are 
nearby  (Forrest  1983,  Mason  1991,  Brown  and  Gwynne  1997)  males  may 
have  the  most  opportunities  to  mate  in  large  trees  and  tree  clumps. 

2.  A  large  supply  of  food  is  available  in  large  trees  and  tree  clumps,  where  the 
staminate  pine  cones  on  which  C.  monstrosa  feed  (Morris  and  Gwynne, 
1978)  are  numerous. 

3.  Male  C.  monstrosa  can  call  until  the  ambient  temperature  falls  below  freez- 
ing (Morris  and  Gwynne  1978),  which  happens  later  in  the  night  in  large 
trees  and  tree  clumps  than  in  small  trees  and  tree  clumps  (Brooke  1970, 
Franklin  and  Dyrness  1972,  Spurr  and  Barnes  1992,  Geiger  et  al.  1995). 
Therefore,  crickets  can  sing  longer  in  large  trees  and  tree  clumps  and  possi- 
bly increase  their  likelihood  of  attracting  a  mate. 

4.  Large  trees  and  tree  clumps  are  considerably  taller  than  small  trees  and  tree 
clumps.  Male  Anurogiyllus  arboreus  climb  trees  to  increase  the  broadcast 
range  of  their  song  (Paul  and  Walker  1979,  Walker  1983),  and  climbing  ben- 
efits other  species  in  a  like  manner  (Ewing  1989).  Thus,  by  singing  from  high 
perches  that  large  trees  or  tree  clumps  offer,  male  C.  monstrosa  may  optimize 
the  broadcast  range  of  their  songs. 

In  sum,  if  Cyphoderris  spp.  differ  in  territoriality  because  of  differing  bene- 
fits, rwo  predictions  should  hold:  first,  within  the  habitat  of  C.  monstrosa  certain 
locations  should  offer  better  resources  than  others,  and  second,  within  the  habi- 
tat of  C.  strepitans  and  C.  buckelli  such  heterogeneity  should  be  lacking.  Con- 
sistent with  the  second  prediction,  Morris  et  al.  (2002)  show  that  C.  buckelli  sing 
from  randomly  chosen  bushes.  Consistent  with  the  first  prediction,  I  here  show 
that  C.  monstrosa  prefer  large  trees  and  clumps  of  trees. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

This  research  was  made  possible  by  two  generous  Explorers  Club  Grants.  B.  Montgomery,  R. 
Lemon,  A.  D.  McLucas,  I.  Ives,  K.  McDonald.  D.  and  B.  Mosely,  and  S.  Coins  provided  critical  field 
assistance.  Dr.  P.  J.  DeVries,  T.  Walla,  V.  Shekhtman,  Dr.  T.  Cohn,  Dr.  T.  Eisner,  Dr.  A.  Mason,  and 
R.  Ladau  generously  provided  assistance  with  planning  and  writing.  The  writing  was  also  improved 
by  an  anonymous  reviewer. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Batschelet,  E.    19X1.  Circular  statistics  in  biology.  Academic  Press.  London,  England.  371  pp. 

Brooke,  R.  C.  1970.  The  Subalpine  Mountain  Hemlock  /one.  Pp.  147-349.  //;.  Kragina.  Z.  J. 
(Editor).  Ecology  of  western  North  America.  Department  of  Botany,  University  of  British  Colum- 
bia. British  Columbia.  Canada.  349  pp. 


204  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Brown,  W.  D.  and  D.  T.  Gwynne  1997.  Evolution  of  Mating  in  Crickets,  Katydids,  and  Wetas 
(Ensifera).  pp.  281-314.  In,  Gangwere,  S.  K.  and  M.  C.  Muralirangan  (Editors).  The  Bionomics 
of  Grasshoppers,  Katydids,  and  Their  Kin.  CAB  International.  Wallingford,  United  Kingdom. 
529  pp. 

Dodson,  G.  N.,  G.  K.  Morris,  and  D.  T.  Gwynne  1983.  Mating  behavior  of  the  primitive 
orthopteran  genus  Cyphoderris  (Haglidae).  pp.  305-318.  //;,  Gwynne,  D.  T.  and  G.  K.  Morris 
(Editors).  Orthopteran  Mating  Systems:  Sexual  Competition  in  a  Diverse  Group  of  Insects.  West- 
view  Press.  Boulder,  Colorado,  U.S.A.  376  pp. 

Ewing,  A.  W.  1989.  Arthropod  Bioacoustics.  Cornell  University  Press.  Ithaca,  New  York,  U.S.A. 
240  pp. 

Forrest,  T.  G.  1983.  Calling  Songs  and  Mate  Choice  in  Mole  Crickets,  pp.  185-204.  In,  Gwynne, 
D.  T.  and  G.  K.  Morris  (Editors),  Orthopteran  Mating  Systems:  Sexual  Competition  in  a  Diverse 
Group  of  Insects.  Wesrview  Press.  Boulder,  Colorado,  U.S.A.  376  pp. 

Franklin,  J.  F.  and  C.  T.  Dyrness  1972.  Natural  Vegetation  of  Oregon  and  Washington.  Oregon 
State  University  Press.  Corvallis,  Oregon,  U.S.A.  452  pp. 

Geiger,  R.,  R.  Aorn,  and  P.  Toddhunter  1995.  The  Climate  Near  the  Ground:  Fifth  Edition. 
Vieweg.  Wiesbaden,  Germany.  528  pp. 

Mason,  A.  C.  1991.  Hearing  in  the  primitive  ensiferan:  the  auditory  system  of  Cyphoderris  mon- 
strosa  (Orthoptera:  Haglidae).  Journal  of  Comparative  Physiology  A  168:  351-363. 

Mason,  A.  C.  1996.  Territoriality  and  the  function  of  song  in  the  primitive  acoustic  insect  Cypho- 
derris monstrosa  (Orthoptera:  Haglidae).  Animal  Behaviour  51:21 1-24. 

Morris,  G.  K.  and  D.  T.  Gwynne  1978.  Geographical  distribution  and  observations  of  Cyphoderris 
(Orthoptera:  Haglidae)  with  a  description  of  a  new  species.  Psyche  85:147-167. 

Morris,  G.  K.,  P.  A.  DeLuca,  M.  Norton,  and  A.  C.  Mason  2002.  Calling-song  function  male  hag- 
lids  (Orthoptera:  Haglidae,  Cyphoderris).  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  80:  271-285. 

Parker,  G.  A.  and  Maynard  Smith,  J.   1990.  Optiinality  theory  in  evolutionary  biology.  Nature 

348:27-33. 

Paul,  R.  C.  and  T.  J.  Walker   1979.  Arboreal  singing  in  a  burrowing  cricket,  Anurogryllus 

arhoreus.  Journal  of  Comparative  Physiology  A  132:  217-223. 

Sakaluk,  S.  K.,  W.  A.  Snedden,  K.  A.  Jacobson,  and  A.  K.  Eggert  1995.  Sexual  competition  in 
sagebrush  crickets:  must  males  hear  calling  rivals?  Behavioral  Ecology  3:  250-257. 

Snedden,  W.  A.  and  S.  Irazuzta  1994.  Attraction  of  Female  Sagebrush  Crickets  to  Male  Song: 
The  Importance  of  Field  Bioassays.  Journal  of  Insect  Behavior  7:  233-236. 

Spurr,  S.  H.  and  B.  V.  Barnes  1992.  Forest  Ecology.  Krieger  Publishing  Company,  Malabar, 
Florida,  U.S.A.  687  pp. 

Walker,  T.  J.  1983.  Mating  Modes  and  Female  Choice  in  Short-Tailed  Crickets  (Anurogryllus 
arhoreus).  In.  Gwynne,  D.  T.  and  G.  K.  Morris  (Editors).  Orthopteran  Mating  Systems:  Sexual 
Competition  in  a  Diverse  Group  of  Insects,  pp.  240-267.  Westview  Press.  Boulder,  Colorado.  376 
pp. 

Zar,  J.  H.  1996.  Biostatistical  Analysis:  Third  Edition.  Prentice  Hall.  Englewood  Cliffs,  New 
Jersey,  U.S.A.  918pp. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 205 

ADULT  CHLOROPIDAE  (DIPTERA) 
ASSOCIATED  WITH  CONSTRUCTED  TREATMENT 

WETLANDS  MODIFIED  BY 
THREE  VEGETATION  MANAGEMENT  TECHNIQUES' 

J.  B.  Keiper,  M.  Stanczak;,  and  W.  E.  Walton' 

ABSTRACT:  Eight  genera  of  Chloropidae  were  collected  from  experimental  wetland  research  cells 
manipulated  by  different  vegetation  control  strategies  in  southern  California,  U.S.A.  After  flooding, 
chloropids  were  collected  with  detergent  pan  traps  for  14  months.  Eribolus  californicus.  a  secondary 
invader  of  emergent  wetland  plants,  was  the  only  abundant  species.  Results  indicate  that  density  of 
adult  Chloropidae  was  not  affected  differently  by  the  wetland  plant  management  techniques  used. 
However,  the  techniques  slowed  the  growth  of  emergent  macrophytes  (particularly  bulrush, 
Schoenoplectus  spp.)  that  are  the  sites  of  larval  development.  Therefore,  first  year  data  show  low 
numbers  of  chloropids,  with  a  two-  to  three-fold  increase  by  year  two. 

KEY  WORDS:  Chloropidae,  Diptera,  adults,  wetlands,  vegetation  management  techniques. 

Chloropid  flies  (Diptera:  Chloropidae)  represent  a  large  family  with  about 
1300  species  worldwide  (Rogers  et  al.  1991).  Many  species  of  chloropids  are 
considered  to  be  either  primary  or  secondary  invaders  of  plants,  especially  grass- 
es, sedges,  and  rushes  (Valley  et  al.  1969,  Todd  and  Foote  1987,  Keiper  et  al. 
2002,  Beaulieu  and  Wheeler  2002).  Other  species  appear  to  exhibit  more  scav- 
enging habits  (Ferrar  1987,  Keiper  et  al.  2002),  and  yet  others  are  pest  species 
that  may  be  vectors  of  ocular  diseases  (Liohippelates,  Siphunculina  spp.)  or 
cause  damage  to  crops  (Ferrar  1987).  Most  species  are  not  anthropophilic. 

Wetland  environments  provide  habitat  and  food  for  many  chloropid  species, 
and  their  abundance  appears  to  be  tied  directly  to  the  wetland  plant  diversity 
(Valley  and  Foote  1997).  Large  numbers  of  chloropid  individuals  and  numerous 
species  are  frequently  found  in  marsh  areas  (Todd  and  Foote  1987).  However, 
due  to  damage  caused  by  human  activities,  many  wetland  habitats  are  threatened, 
and  the  restoration  or  replacement  of  wetland  areas  is  common  practice  today 
(Hammer  1997).  Both  comparatively  old  and  newly  constructed  wetland  areas 
are  frequently  subjected  to  vegetation  management  to  prevent  aquatic  plants 
from  eliminating  open  water  areas.  Excessive  growth  of  vegetation  in  construct- 
ed wetlands  can  lead  to  decreased  efficiency  in  treating  wastewater  (Marble 
1992,  Thullen  et  al.  2002),  and  provide  less  suitable  habitat  for  waterfowl  and 
other  wildlife  than  a  hemi-marsh  (i.e.  a  marsh  with  approximately  50  percent 
vegetation  cover  and  50  percent  open  water)  (Batzer  et  al.  1999).  A  recent  paper 
showed  that  vegetation  management  reduced  adult  shore  fly  (Diptera: 
Ephydridae)  densities,  but  populations  required  less  than  one  year  to  produce 


1  Received  on  August  2,  2002.  Accepted  on  March  1 3,  2004. 

'Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  Cleveland  Museum  of  Natural  History,  1  Wade  Oval  Drue. 
Cleveland,  Ohio  44106  U.S.A.   E-mail:  jkeiperdf  cinnh.org. 

'  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  California.  Riverside,  California  92521  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  August  25.  2004 


206  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


equally  dense  communities  during  experimental  vegetation  management  in 
southern  California  (Keiper  and  Walton  2002).  This  study  describes  the  colo- 
nization of  chloropid  flies  associated  with  experimental  constructed  treatment 
wetlands  subjected  to  three  different  vegetation  management  strategies.  It  also 
tests  the  null  hypothesis  that  densities  of  abundant  species  are  not  significantly 
affected  by  these  methods  of  wetland  management  in  southern  California,  U.S.A. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  study  was  conducted  at  the  Hemet/San  Jacinto  Regional  Water  Recla- 
mation Facility  in  western  Riverside  County,  CA  (USA)  (Keiper  and  Walton 
2002).  Eight  0.1  ha  research  cells  (69  x  14m)  were  used  and  divided  into  three 
categories  after  all  cells  were  burned  and  dried  to  leave  only  underground  rhi- 
zomes. Three  cells  were  randomly  assigned  as  control  cells  (C).  Three  remaining 
cells  were  randomly  selected  and  scoured  with  a  rock  bucket  attached  to  a  back- 
hoe  (S).  The  remaining  two  cells  had  hummocks  (earthen  mounds)  installed  in 
the  shallow  areas  after  the  cells  were  scoured  (H).  Hummocks  were  designed  to 
provide  shallow  areas  to  focus  emergent  vegetation,  primarily  California  bulrush 
(Schoenoplectus  californicus  [Meyer]  Sojak),  while  keeping  areas  between  hum- 
mocks free  of  vegetative  growth.  Each  cell  received  secondary-treated  waste- 
water  containing  excess  nitrogen  (~9.9  mg  L-'NH"4-N,  and  <1  mg  L-1  NO-rN) 
from  the  treatment  plant.  Other  workers  studying  the  research  cell  complex  con- 
currently found  that  H  cells  reduced  ammonium  levels  by  66  percent  and  28  per- 
cent during  1998  and  1999,  respectively.  Vegetative  cover  was  reduced  by  ap- 
proximately 40  percent  in  the  H  cells  (Thullen  et  al.  2002). 

Flooding  of  the  cells  began  July  13,  1998,  and  was  completed  after  7  days.  On 
the  second  day  of  this  flooding,  detergent  pan  traps  (23  x  33  cm)  were  set  out 
along  the  western  edge  of  each  of  the  cells;  one  on  either  end,  and  one  in  the  mid- 
dle, to  represent  a  variety  of  open  water,  plant,  and  mud  shore  microhabitats.  Pans 
were  set  out  every  week  for  the  first  12  weeks  of  inundation,  every  2  to  3  weeks 
in  the  summer  of  1999,  and  less  frequently  during  early  spring  and  winter.  Trap- 
ping was  concluded  on  September  10,  1999.  Each  pan  was  filled  with  approx- 
imately 5  cm  of  water,  to  which  a  few  drops  of  liquid  dishwashing  detergent  were 
added;  insects  alighting  on  the  surface  fell  through  the  surface  and  drowned 
(Larson  and  Foote  1997,  Keiper  and  Walton  2002).  Pans  and  their  contents  were 
collected  after  24  hours  and  preserved  for  later  analysis.  Keiper  and  Walton 
(2002)  provide  a  more  detailed  description  of  the  study  site  and  the  methods  used. 
Representative  specimens  were  dehydrated  and  pinned,  and  are  deposited  in  the 
Entomology  Research  Museum  of  the  University  of  California  -  Riverside,  or 
the  Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  Cleveland  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Species  were  categorized  as  abundant  (>20  percent  of  all  specimens  captured), 
common  (>10  but  <20  percent),  uncommon  (>1  but  <10  percent),  or  rare  (<1  per- 
cent). Statistical  analyses  were  applied  only  to  species  that  were  abundant.  Non- 
parametric  (Friedman's  repeated  measures  ANOVA)  or  parametric  (one-way 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 20" 

repeated  measures  ANOVA)  statistics  were  performed  where  appropriate  to  test 
the  hypothesis  that  the  numbers  of  adults  captured  differed  significantly  between 
the  wetland  treatments  (SigmaStat  1997).  Due  to  the  time  of  initial  inundation 
and  dates  sampled  during  each  year,  the  two  years  were  treated  separately. 

RESULTS 

A  total  of  452  chloropids  from  eight  genera  were  collected.  Eribolus  calif or- 
nicus  was  the  only  abundant  species  and  was  first  encountered  10  days  after 
flooding  began.  Pseudopachychaeta  approximatonervis  (Zetterstedt)  was  com- 
mon but  was  not  captured  until  approximately  4  months  after  flooding  of  the 
cells.  Elachiptera  nigriceps  Loew  Sabrosky  arrived  quickly  (24  days  after  flood- 
ing), but  was  uncommon.  The  remaining  five  genera  each  accounted  for  <1  pre- 
cent  of  the  total  number  of  chloropid  flies  collected  (Table  1 ). 

Eribolus  californicus  was  infrequently  collected  during  the  first  summer  and 
fall  of  the  study,  with  mean  densities  never  exceeding  two  individuals  per  pan 
trap  in  all  treatments.  However,  by  early  spring  of  1999,  densities  increased  two- 
to  threefold  and  peaked  in  June  at  approximately  six  individuals  per  trap.  Num- 
bers declined  during  summer  (Fig.  1).  However,  the  abundance  of  adult  E.  cali- 
fornicus during  1998  (y}  =  0.273,  d.f  =  2,  p  =  0.88)  and  1999  (F27  ==  1.03,  p  = 
0.38)  did  not  differ  significantly  among  the  three  treatment  types. 

DISCUSSION 

Previous  work  on  shore  flies  showed  that  populations  of  some  common  taxa 
were  inhibited  by  the  scoured  and  hummock  treatments  during  the  first  summer 
of  inundation.  However,  all  treatments  produced  statistically  equal  numbers  of 
individuals  by  the  second  year  (Keiper  and  Walton  2002).  Eribolus  californicus 
was  the  only  abundant  chloropid  species,  and  adult  density  was  statistically  equal 
in  all  treatments.  The  addition  of  hummocks  to  cells  reduced  the  vegetation  cov- 
erage by  40  percent,  and  was  the  most  successful  management  technique  in  terms 
of  reducing  lateral  growth  of  bulrush  (Thullen  et  al.  2002).  Although  we  con- 
ducted no  rearing,  California  bulrush  grew  in  a  virtual  monoculture  in  the  cells 
and  is  probably  the  larval  food  source  for  E.  californicus.  Other  Eribolus  species 
exhibit  secondary  herbivory  in  the  larval  stage  (Valley  and  Foote  1997).  The  rel- 
ative scarcity  of  E.  californicus  during  1998  was  probably  due  to  a  lack  of  sub- 
stantive stands  of  bulrush  in  the  cells,  although  a  modest  peak  in  numbers 
occurred  in  November  as  bulrush  stands  were  maturing.  Peaks  in  1999  occurred 
in  April  and  June.  Sampling  did  not  continue  until  November  1999,  thus  we  can 
not  conclude  with  certainty  that  November  is  a  period  when  a  late  generation  of 
E.  californicus  occurs.  From  these  data,  we  suggest  that  in  southwestern  habitats, 
E.  californicus  is  at  least  bivoltine  with  generations  in  April  and  June,  and  is  pos- 
sibly trivoltine  with  a  peak  in  November.  Eribolus  species  are  most  commonly 
found  in  May  and  early  June  in  more  temperate  areas  but  can  be  found  from  mid- 
April  to  late  October  (Valley  and  Foote  1997). 


208 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Table  1.  Chloropidae  taken  in  pan  traps  at  the  Hemet/San  Jacinto  RWRF  Research  Cell  Complex, 
1998-1999;  taxa  arranged  phylogenetically.  Abundance  in  parentheses:  A  =  abundant  (>20%),  C  = 
common  (>10  but  <20%),  U  =  uncommon  (>1  but  <10%),  R  =  rare  (<1%). 


Taxa                                                      Trophic  level 

Pseudopachychaeta 
approximatonervis                                  Herbivore 

Frequency            Days  until  first 
appearance 

0.15  (C)                       122 

Biorbitella  sp.                                                   ? 

<0.01  (R)                      24 

Eribolis  californicus                               Herbivore/ 
2°  invader 

0.77  (A)                         10 

Elachiptera  nigriceps                              Herbivore/ 
2°  invader 
Liohippelates  sp.                                       Herbivore 

0.06  (U)                       24 
<0.01  (R)                     248 

Gaurax  sp.                                                 Scavenger 

O.01  (R)                      65 

Rhopalopterum  sp.                                  Herbivore/ 
2°  invader 

<0.01  (R)                      79 

Apotropina  sp.                                           Scavenger 

O.01  (R)                      72 

10  -i 

—  *  —  Control 

UJ 

^      8  - 

—©—Scoured 
—A—  Hummock 

1 

fc      6- 

Q. 

A 

'ribolus  californicus 

Isj  .U 
1  1 

;          i 

n  I 

7      Li 

UJ 

C 
(0 

£     o- 

c§;ciftdS^^                    i 

1  ^"^^^.j^  1 

5-May-98      24-Jul-98      12-Oct-98     31-Dec-98     21-Mar-99      9-Jun-99      28-Aug-99     16-Nov-99 

Fig.  I.  Mean  number  of  Eribolus  californicus  taken  in  pan  traps  from  research  cells 
modified  by  three  different  vegetation  management  strategies. 


The  second  most  frequently  encountered  chloropid  was  Pseudopachychaeta 
approximatonervis,  a  herbivore  which  feeds  on  the  inflorescences  of  plants  such 
as  spike-rush  (Todd  and  Foote  1 987).  Due  to  repeated  captures  in  a  bulrush 
monoculture,  P.  approximatonervis  may  be  using  S.  californicus  as  a  host  plant. 
The  late  appearance  of/!  approximatonervis  (1 24  days,  Table  I )  may  have  been 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 209 

due  to  the  time  it  takes  for  S.  californicus  to  flower  and  eventually  develop  seed 
heads.  Elachiptera  nigriceps  (Loew)  is  a  secondary  invader  that  normally  feeds 
on  shoots  of  Carex  and  partially  opened  flowers  of  Iris;  the  primary  invaders  of 
these  plants  are  larvae  of  Lepidoptera.  Elachiptera  nigriceps  is  also  known  to 
scavenge  decaying  skunk  cabbage  (Ferrar  1987)  and  may  opportunistically  scav- 
enge decaying  plant  matter  in  the  areas  where  skunk  cabbage  occurs. 

The  remaining  five  genera  were  rare.  Flies  of  the  genus  Apotropina  are  scav- 
engers as  larvae,  and  are  found  in  the  nests  of  birds  or  wasps  (Ferrar  1987);  tri- 
color blackbirds  and  marsh  wrens,  among  other  avian  taxa,  nested  in  the  research 
cells  (JBK,  personal  observation).  Some  larvae  of  Gaurax  can  be  found  feeding 
on  the  decaying  plant  material  in  bird  nests,  while  others  are  found  in  bracket 
fungi  associated  with  Coleoptera  larvae.  It  has  been  suggested  that  Gaurax  lar- 
vae also  feed  on  beetle  frass  (Valley  et  al.  1969),  while  some  species  are  known 
to  be  predators  of  spider  egg  cocoons  (Ferrar  1987).  The  genus  Liohippelates 
was  a  rare  genus  in  this  study,  and  contains  flies  known  as  eye  gnats,  which  may 
be  vectors  of  ocular  disorders  and  yaws — skin  ulcers  on  face,  feet,  and  hands 
(Rogers  et  al.  1991).  Some  have  been  found  on  the  yellow  water  lily  (Todd  and 
Foote  1987),  but  no  evidence  suggests  that  they  are  associated  with  bulrush.  Rho- 
palopterum  is  a  genus  of  secondary  invaders  that  inhabit  stems  of  wetland  mono- 
cots  (Keiper  et  al.  2002).  Some  plants  attacked  by  this  genus  are  grasses,  sedges, 
and  cattails  (Todd  and  Foote  1987).  No  information  on  the  biology  or  feeding 
habits  of  the  genus  Biorbitella  is  known. 

In  conclusion,  the  chloropid  community  in  these  wetland  cells  is  relatively 
rich  with  eight  species,  with  certain  species  (Eribolis  californicus,  Pseudopachy- 
chaeta  approximatoner\'is,  and  Elachiptera  nigriceps)  occurring  frequently.  Veg- 
etation management  practices  did  not  appear  to  inhibit  species  richness  within 
the  research  cells.  However,  when  compared  to  what  little  work  has  been  done  in 
natural  wetlands,  the  constructed  wetlands  harbored  far  fewer  species  of  Chloro- 
pidae  (e.g.  Todd  and  Foote  1987).  Perhaps  if  more  than  one  plant  species  was 
seeded,  the  research  cells  would  support  a  more  species-rich  community  of 
chloropid  flies.  The  adult  flies  may  be  an  important  food  source  for  birds  and 
amphibians,  and  the  larvae  could  represent  significant  herbivores  or  scavengers, 
therefore  contributing  substantially  to  energy  flow  and  nutrient  cycling  within 
constructed  wetland  ecosystems. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  J.  Thullen  (USGS),  J.  Sartoris  (USGS),  and  J.  Somsuvanskul  (Eastern  Municipal  Water 
District)  for  support  and  cooperation  during  this  study.  M.  Sanford,  K.  Chan.  L.  H.  Ciould,  J.  Jiannino, 
L.  Randall,  and  P.  D.  Workman  (UCR)  helped  with  field  and  laboratory'  work.  M.  Sanford.  D.  Dunn 
(C'MNH),  as  well  as  an  anonymous  reviewer,  kindly  reviewed  the  manuscript.  The  study  was  sup- 
ported, in  part,  by  Special  Funds  for  Mosquito  Research  from  the  Dis  ision  of  Agriculture  and  Natural 
Resources  of  the  University  of  California.  USDA  funding  to  the  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  at 
UCR,  and  the  California  Mosquito  and  Vector  Control  Association  Research  Foundation. 


2 1 0  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Batzer,  D.  P.,  R.  B.  Rader,  and  S.  A.  Wissinger.  1999.  Invertebrates  in  Freshwater  Wetlands  of 
North  America:  Ecology  and  Management.  Wiley,  New  York.  1 120  pp. 

Beaulieu,  F.  and  T.  A.  Wheeler.  2002.  Insects  (Diptera,  Coleoptera,  Lepidoptera)  reared  from  wet- 
land monocots  (Cyperaceae,  Poaceae,  Typhaceae)  in  southern  Quebec.  Proceedings  of  the  Ento- 
mological Society  of  Washington  104:300-308. 

Ferrar,  P.  1987.  A  guide  to  the  breeding  habits  and  immature  stages  of  Diptera,  Cyclorrhapha. 
Entomonograph  Volume  8.  Scandinavian  Science  Press  Ltd.  448  pp. 

Hammer,  D.  A.   1997.  Creating  Freshwater  Wetlands.  CRC  Press,  Inc.,  Boca  Raton.  240  pp. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  and  W.  E.  Walton.  2002.  Effects  of  three  vegetation  management  strategies  on  shore- 
flies  (Diptera:  Ephydridae)  in  newly  constructed  treatment  wetlands.  Annals  of  the  Entomologi- 
cal Society  of  America  95:570-576. 

Keiper,  J.  B.,  W.  E.  Walton,  and  B.  A.  Foote.  2002.  Biology  and  ecology  of  higher  Diptera  from 
freshwater  wetlands.  Annual  Review  of  Entomology  47:207-232. 

Larson,  L.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1997.  Biology  of  four  species  of  Notiphila  Fallen  (Diptera:  Ephy- 
dridae) associated  with  the  yellow  water  lily,  Nuphar  luteurn  (Nymphaeaceae).  Proceedings  of  the 
Entomological  Society  of  Washington  99:542-59. 

Marble,  A.  D.  1992.  A  Guide  to  Wetland  Functional  Design.  Lewis  Publishers,  Boca  Raton.  240 
pp. 

Rogers,  T.  P.,  B.  A.  Foote,  and  J.  L.  Todd.  1991.  Biology  and  immature  stages  of  Chlorops  cer- 
timus  and  Epichlomps  exilis  (Diptera:  Chloropidae),  stem  borers  of  wetland  sedges.  Journal  of 
the  New  York  Entomological  Society  99:664-683. 

SigmaStat.   1997.  SigmaStat  statistical  software.  SPSS  Inc.,  Chicago.  250  pp. 

I  liul  k'ii,  J.  S.,  J.  J.  Sartoris,  and  W.  E.  Walton.  2002.  Effects  of  vegetation  management  in  con- 
structed wetland  treatment  cells  on  water  quality  and  mosquito  production.  Ecological  Engi- 
neering 18:441-457. 

Todd,  J.  L.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1987.  Resource  partitioning  in  Chloropidae  (Diptera)  of  a  freshwater 
marsh.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  89:803-810. 

Valley,  K.  V.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1997.  Biology  and  immature  stages  of  Eribolus  longiilus.  with  notes 
on  E.  nanus  (Diptera:  Chloropidae),  secondary  invaders  of  herbaceous  wetland  plants.  Memoirs 
of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  18:  273-279. 

Valley,  K.  V.,  R.  T.  Wearseh,  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1969.  Larval  feeding  habits  of  certain  Chloropidae. 
Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  71:  29-34. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


HETEROPTERAN  ADVENTITIOUS  BITERS 
(HEMIPTERA):  PRIMITIVELY  PREDACEOUS?' 

Carl  W.  Schaefer 

ABSTRACT:  The  foods  of  most  heteropterans  are  either  plants  or  other  arthropods.  I  surveyed 
records  of  bugs  which  have  adventitiously  bitten  humans,  and  found  that  38  of  these  records  are  of 
bugs  whose  ancestors  were  herbivorous.  One  hundred  eighty-four  records  are  of  bugs  which  are,  or 
whose  ancestors  were,  predaceous.  The  relative  ratios  of  biting  records  to  numbers  of  bugs  in  these 
groups  is  3.10  for  primarily  herbivorous  bugs,  and  8.50  for  primarily  predaceous  ones.  The  greater 
propensity  of  predaceous  bugs  to  bite  humans  may  reflect  similarities  between  these  bugs'  usual  (or 
ancestral)  hosts  and  the  exudations  of  humans. 

KEY  WORDS:  Heteroptera,  nuisance  biters,  adventitious  biters,  predation,  herbivory. 

Heteropterans  that  adventitiously  bite  humans  are  bugs  that  normally  feed  on 
other  hosts.  From  time  to  time  such  bugs  may  attack  people;  to  call  such  nuisance 
attacks  "accidental"  suggests  the  bugs  are  confused  or  distracted;  whereas,  in 
fact,  the  attack  may  be  quite  deliberate  -  -  a  search  for  fluid,  minerals,  warmth 
(see  Schaefer  2000a).  While  writing  a  chapter  on  such  bugs  (Schaefer  2000a),  it 
occurred  to  me  that  many  of  these  records  are  of  bugs  which  were,  or  whose 
ancestors  were,  predaceous;  and  that  there  seemed  to  be  fewer  records  of  her- 
bivorous and  ancestrally  herbivorous  bugs.  Here  I  document  that  impression  and 
briefly  discuss  it. 

Ryckman  (1979),  Ryckman  and  Bentley  (1979),  and  I  (2000a)  have  compiled 
many  records  of  bugs  adventitiously  biting  humans  (Table  1 ).  Not  listed  are 
records  of  two  groups,  some  of  whose  members  feed  on  human  blood.  Triato- 
mine  reduviids  and  cimicids  both  feed  exclusively  on  vertebrate  blood,  and  some 
(a  minority)  feed  on  humans.  Although  most  triatomines  do  not  feed  on  humans, 
records  of  adventitious  feeding  by  triatomines  are  not  included  in  Table  1 . 

In  addition,  of  the  many  references  to  cimicid  bites,  most  but  not  all  refer,  of 
course,  to  the  bedbugs  [Cimex  lectularius  L.  and  C.  hemipterus  (F.)].  Yet  sever- 
al of  the  others  refer  to  other  cimicids  that  normally  do  not  feed  on  humans  (see 
also  reports  in  Schaefer  2000b).  Nevertheless,  like  triatomines,  all  cimicids  feed 
on  vertebrate  blood,  and  so  they  too  are  not  included  in  Table  1 . 

Also  absent  from  Table  1  are  records  of  sternorrhynchous  hemipterans  biting 
humans.  There  are  few  such  records,  and  this  paucity  probably  reflects  their  very 
small  size  and  the  consequent  difficulty  of  their  penetrating  human  skin. 
Sternorrhynchs'  relatives,  grouped  para-  (or  poly-)  phyletically  as  "Auchenor- 
rhyncha,"  are  usually  larger  and  at  many  times  bite  humans  (Table  1;  Schaefer 
2000a). 


1  Submitted  on  October  11,  2002.  Accepted  on  June  3,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Ecology  and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of  Connecticut,  Storrs,  CT  06269- 
3043  U.S.A.  Schaefer@uconnvm.uconn.edu. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


2 1 2  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Table  1 .  Number  of  reports  of  adventitious  biting  by  hemipterans.  Several  re- 
ports contain  more  than  one  species,  and  several  reports  of  the  same  family  may 
contain  the  same  species.  Schaefer's  (2000a)  reports  are  in  addition  to  these  of 
Ryckman  (1979)  and  Ryckman  and  Bentley  (1979);  the  last  two  reports  are  com- 
bined. 

Family  of  Hemiptera  Ryckman  ( 1 979),  Schaefer  (2000a) 

Ryckman  and  Bentley  (1979) 

Cydnidae  1  2 

Pentatomidae  2 

(excluding  Asopinae) 

Pentatomidae:  Asopinae  2 

Coreidae  1 

Rhopalidae  1 

Pyrrhocoridae  8 

Lygaeidae  (sensu  lato)  19                                            1 

Berytidae  1 

Enicocephalidae  2 

Reduviidae  (excluding  74 

Triatominae) 

Nabidae  12  1 

Anthocoridae  20  7 

Miridae  16  10* 

Tingidae  5 

Dipsocoridae,  2 

Cryptostemmatidae, 
Ceratocombidae 

Notonectidae  7 

Belostomatidae  7 

Naucoridae  2 

"Auchenorrhyncha"  2 1  1 

*plus  27  additional  species  of  Miridae  from  Wheeler  (2001 );  total  =  59. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 213 

There  are  38  reports  of  adventitious  biting  by  bugs  belonging  to  primarily  her- 
bivorous groups  (i.e.,  groups  whose  ancestors  were  also  herbivorous:  Cydnidae 
through  Berytidae  in  Table  1)  and  184  reports  of  such  biting  by  primarily  pre- 
daceous  bugs  or  bugs  which,  although  herbivorous  now,  are  evolved  from  car- 
nivorous groups  (Enicocephalidae  through  Naucoridae  in  Table  1).  "Auchenor- 
rhyncha"  are  not  included  in  either  tally.  The  reports  of  Lygaeidae  (sensu  lato) 
do  not  distinguish  between  those  that  feed  only  on  plants  and  those  that  also  prey 
upon  insects  (Geocorinae).  The  same  is  true  of  Pyrrhocoridae,  some  of  whose 
species  are  at  least,  in  part,  predaceous  (see  Schaefer  1999). 

In  addition,  the  records  in  Table  1  here  do  not  distinguish  between  those  biters 
which  took  in  actual  internal  fluids  (cell  contents,  blood,  lymph)  and  those  which 
either  imbibed  external  fluid  (sweat)  or  nothing  at  all.  This  could  be  an  impor- 
tant distinction,  as  is  also  the  temperature  at  which  these  attacks  occurred.  Very 
often,  under  experimental  conditions,  predaceous  bugs  will  not  feed  below  a  cer- 
tain temperature  threshold  (A.  C.  Cohen,  personal  communication). 

Any  analysis  of  these  numbers  must  be  far  more  qualitative  than  quantitative; 
the  reports  overlap  to  some  extent  (including  the  same  species)  and  several  re- 
ports include  more  than  one  species.  But  the  difference  is  large:  38  reports  of  bit- 
ing by  primitively  herbivorous  bugs  and  184  reports  of  biting  by  bugs  either 
predaceous  or  secondarily  herbivorous  (see  Schaefer  1997). 

However,  there  are  many  far  more  primarily  predaceous  bugs  than  primarily 
herbivorous  ones.  All  the  latter  are  members  of  the  heteropteran  infraorder  Pen- 
tatomomorpha,  which  has  altogether  about  12,400  described  species.  The  pri- 
marily predaceous  bugs  belong  to  these  heteropteran  infraorders:  Enicocephal- 
omorpha  ( 1 30  species),  Dipsocoromorpha  (210),  Nepomorpha  ( 1 900),  and  Cimi- 
comorpha  (19,400;  10,000  of  these  species  are  Miridae  [Schuh  1995],  the  largest 
by  far  of  the  heteropteran  families);  the  total  of  these  primarily  predaceous  infra- 
orders  is  21,640  (numbers  from  Schaefer  unpublished).  The  relative  ratios  rela- 
tive ratio  of  reports  to  numbers  of  bugs  is  3.10  for  primarily  herbivorous  bugs 
[38/12,400  x  1,000]  and  8.50  for  predaceous  or  secondarily  herbivorous  bugs 
[184/21,640  x  1,000].  Because  the  ratios  are  very  small,  I  multiply  each  by  1,000. 

Thus,  even  taking  into  account  the  larger  number  of  primarily  predaceous 
bugs,  there  are  proportionately  more  reports  of  them  feeding  adventitiously  than 
of  primarily  herbivorous  bugs  doing  so;  and  the  relative  ratio  rises  when  Miridae 
are  excluded  (see  Appendix).  In  addition,  the  only  secondarily  predaceous  group 
among  the  herbivores  (Asopinae)  has  only  two  records  of  adventitious  biting  (see 
Schaefer  2000a).  Note  that  the  ratio  for  predaceous  bugs  would  greatly  increase 
if  the  records  of  adventitious  biting  by  those  cimicids  and  triatomine  reduviids 
that  do  not  normally  attack  humans  were  included  in  the  total. 

Miridae  are  herbivorous;  many,  many  are  predaceous;  and  many  are  both.  The 
family  itself  is  almost  certainly  descended  from  predaceous  ancestors  and  its  her- 
bivorous members  are  therefore  secondarily  herbivorous  (see  discussion  in 
Wheeler  2001  and  Schaefer  1997).  Doubtless  many  of  its  predaceous  members 


214  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


are  descended  from  herbivores,  whereas  the  feeding  habits  of  others  (e.g.  ,  Iso- 
metopinae)  are  directly  descended  from  that  of  the  predaceous  ancestor.  Because 
the  family  is  so  large  and  so  diverse,  I  discuss  it  separately  in  an  Appendix,  while 
including  its  species  more  generally  in  the  discussion  here. 

These  data  suggest  that  ancestral  feeding  habits  (herbivorous  and  predaceous) 
are  better  predictors  of  adventitious  biting  than  present  feeding  habits  (see  Table 
2).  The  reasons  for  this  difference  are  obscure.  Perhaps  humans  and  the  usual 
arthropod  prey  of  predaceous  bugs  (and  formerly  predaceous  bugs)  emit  attrac- 
tants  more  similar  than  do  plants;  and  predators  (and  former  predators)  are  then 
attracted  to  such  things  as  volatile  amino  acids,  CO2,  some  degree  of  warmth, 
and/or  something  else  given  off  by  both  the  usual  (or  former)  arthropod  prey  and 
humans.  Perhaps  predators  are  more  attracted  to  the  directed  movement  of  ani- 
mals, whether  prey  or  not,  than  they  are  to  the  less  directed  movement  of  plants. 
It  may  simply  be  that  predaceous  insects  are  more  ready  to  use  their  beaks  in 
defense  than  are  herbivorous  insects,  and  that,  therefore,  at  least  some  of  the 
records  in  Table  1  reflect  defensive,  not  feeding,  bites.  This  may  be  especially 
true  of  the  three  water  bugs. 

However,  the  circumstances  surrounding  the  various  recorded  instances  sug- 
gest that  the  bugs  were  seeking  something,  moisture  possibly,  more  probably 
salts  or  organic  compounds.  Many  of  the  adventititous  bitings  occurred  under 
warm  and  humid  conditions  when  the  attacked  human  was  sweating;  but  whether 
the  sweat  was  the  attraction  or  whether  biting  occurred  because  some  threshold 
temperature  had  been  reached  remains  unknown.  For  further  discussion  see 
Wheeler  (2001). 

We  lack  the  opposing  data  to  help  test  these  statements:  we  do  not  know  how 
often  predaceous  (and  formerly  predaceous)  herbivores  are  attracted  to  nonhost 
plants.  We  do  not  know  how  often  bugs  which  feed  on  humans  are  attracted  to 
nonhuman  animals  or  to  plants.  We  do  know  that  predaceous  bugs  will  suck  juices 
from  plants  and  that  herbivorous  bugs  will  sometimes  attack  other  arthropods. 
But  we  lack  data  similar  to,  and  therefore  comparable  with,  those  in  Table  1 . 

Nevertheless,  experiments  with  CO-,,  different  human  hosts,  various  volatiles, 
temperature  gradients,  etc.  should  help  clarify  how  significant  the  differences 
among  these  heteropteran  groups  are. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


215 


Table  2.  Ancestrally  and/or  presently  predaceous  and  herbivorous  adventitious  het- 
eropteran  biters  (by  family  group),  with  number  of  reports  of  adventitious  biting  in 
parentheses. 


Feeding  Habits 

Presently  Predaceous 

Presently  Herbivorous 

Ancestrally  Predaceous 

Enicocephalidae  (3) 

Miridae  (53) 
(see  Appendix) 

Reduviidae 
(excl.  Triatominae)  (74) 

Tingidae  (5) 

Nabidae(13) 

Anthocoridae  (27) 

Dipsocoridae  (2)* 

Cryptostemmatidae  (2)* 

Ceratocombidae  (2)* 

Notonectidae  (7) 

Belostomatidae  (7) 

Naucoridae  (2) 

Ancestrally  Herbivorous 

Asopinae  (2) 

Cydnidae  (3) 

Pentatomidae 
(excluding  Asopinae)  (2) 

Coreidae  (  1  ) 

Rhopalidae  (  1  ) 

Pyrrhocoridae  (X) 

Lygaeidae  (s.l.) 
(most)  (20) 

Berytidae  (  1  ) 
"Auchenorrhyncha"  (22) 

*taken  together 


2 1 6  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  am  grateful  to  A.R.  Panizzi  (Embrapa  Soja,  Londrina,  Brazil)  and  to  A.  C.  Cohen  (Insect  Diet 
and  Rearing  Institute,  LLC,  Tucson,  Arizona)  for  their  comments  on  this  paper.  I  particularly  thank 
A.  C.  Cohen,  who  suggested  Table  2  and  other  important  important  changes. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Ryckman,  R.  E.  1979.  Host  reactions  to  bug  bites  (Hemiptera/Homoptera):  a  literature  review  and 
annotated  bibliography.  Part  I.  California  Vector  News  26  (1/2):  1-24. 

Ryckman,  R.  E.,  and  D.  G.  Bentley.  1979.  Host  reactions  to  bug  bites  (Hemiptera/Homoptera):  a 
literature  review  and  annotated  bibliography.  Part  II.  California.  Vector  News  26  (1/2):  25-49. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  1997.  The  origin  of  secondary  carnivory  from  herbivory  in  Heteroptera 
(Hemiptera).  pp.  229-239.  //;,  Ecology  and  Evolution  of  Plant-feeding  Insects  in  Natural  and 
Man-made  Environments.,  A.  Raman  (Editored).  New  Delhi,  International  Scientific  Publica- 
tions. 828  pp. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  1999.  Areviewof  Raxa  (Hemiptera:  Pyrrhocoridae).  Annals  of  the.  Entomological. 
Society  of  Amererica.  92:  14-19. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  2000a.  Adventitious  biters  —  "nuisance"  bugs.  pp.  553-559.  In.  Heteroptera  of 
Economic  Importance,  C.  W.  Schaefer  and  A.R.  Panizzi  (Editors.).  CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton,  Flor- 
ida, U.S.A.  828  pp. 

Schaefer,  C.  W.  2000b.  Bed  bugs  (Cimicidae).  Pp.  519-538.  //;.  Heteroptera  of  Economic  Impor- 
tance., C.  W.  Schaefer  and  A.  R.  Panizzi  (Editors).  CRC  Press,  Boca  Raton,  Florida,  U.S.A. 
828  pp. 

Schuh,  R.  T.  1998.  Plant  Bugs  of  the  World  (Insecta:  Heteroptera:  Miridae).  Systematic  Catalog, 
Distributions,  Host  List,  and  Bibliography.  New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A.,  The  New  York  Entomolog- 
ical Society.  New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A.  1329  pp. 

Wheeler,  A.  G.,  Jr.  2001.  Biology  of  the  Plant  Bugs.  (Hemiptera:  Miridae)  Pests,  Predators,  Op- 
portunists. Cornell  University  Press.  Ithaca,  N.Y.,  U.S.A.  Cornell  University  Press.  507  pp. 


APPENDIX 

The  Miridae  are  abundant  and  varied  enough  to  be  discussed  separately.  Wheeler,  in  his  fine  book 
on  the  family,  lists  the  mirids  known  to  have  bitten  humans  (Wheeler  2001,  Table  15.1).  If  one 
removes  from  this  list  those  species  given  by  Ryckman  (1979)  and  Ryckman  and  Bentley  (1979),  and 
by  me  (Schaefer  2000a),  27  species  remain.  These  bring  the  total  of  adventitiously  biting  mind 
species  to  53,  and  the  total  of  adventitiously  biting  primarily  predaceous  species  to  184.  Of  these  53 
mirid  species,  the  basic  feeding  preferences  of  43  can  be  classified:  13  are  mostly  or  entirely  preda- 
ceous; 21  are  mostly  or  entirely  herbivorous;  and  9  are  mixed  (feed  both  ways)  (information  from 
Wheeler's  book).  I  list  the  Miridae  as  "presently  herbivorous"  in  Table  2. 

Miridae  themselves  bite  adventitiously  less  often  than  other  primarily  predaceous  bugs  .The  rel- 
ative ratio  for  all  nonmirid,  primarily  predaceous  bugs  (11,640  species,  of  which  there  are  131  adven- 
titious-biting records),  is  11.25.  Thus,  inclusion  of  Miridae  among  primarily  predaceous  adventitious 
biters  brings  the  ratio  of  such  biters  down,  from  1 1 .25  to  8.4.  The  ratio  for  Miridae  alone  ([53/10,000] 
x  1,000)  is  5. 3. 

The  relative  ratios  for  herbivorous  mirids  (21  species)  and  predaceous  mirids  ( 13  species)  are  2.1 
and  1 .3,  respectively  (for  mixed  species  [9]:  0.9).  The  relative  ratio  for  those  43  species,  whose  feed- 
ing preferences  are  known,  is  4.3.  However,  these  ratios  are  artificially  low,  because  in  calculating 
them  I  divided  by  the  total  number  of  mirids  ( 10,000),  not  by  the  total  number  (unknown)  of  herbiv- 
orous, predaceous,  and  mixed  mirids,  respectively. 

Why  mirids  bite  adventitiously  less  often  than  other  primarily  predaceous  bugs,  I  do  not  know. 
Maybe  the  fact  that  so  many  members  of  this  very  large  family  are  tropical,  and  less  likely  to  be 
reported,  is  a  factor. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


COPESTYLUM  CIRCUMDATUM  (WALKER)  (DIPTERA: 
SYRPHIDAE):  REDESCRIPTION  OF  A 
NEOTROPICAL  FLOWER  FLY,  WITH 

LECTOTYPE  DESIGNATIONS,  AND  NEW  SYNONYMS1 

F.  Christian  Thompson2  and  Luciane  Marinoni' 

ABSTRACT:  Copestylum  circumdatum  (Walker)  (Diptera:  Syrphidae)  is  redescribed.  Lectotypes  are 
designated  for  two  names  and  one  new  synonym  is  proposed  (Volucella  nuts  Williston  1888  =  cir- 
cumdatum Walker  1857). 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Syrphidae,  Copestylum,  Neotropics,  lectotype,  synonyms. 

Copestylum  circumdatum  is  a  widespread  species  in  the  Neotropics,  which 
breeds  in  bromeliads.  This  species  has  recently  been  reared  by  workers  and  does 
appear  in  biodiversity  inventory  samples.  The  proper  name  for  this  species  has 
been  confused,  as  there  is  unrecognized  but  extensive  variation  in  adult  charac- 
ters, as  well  as  confusion  about  prior  named  concepts.  We  redescribe  the  species, 
propose  the  appropriate  name  and  synonyms  for  this  species,  and  designate  lec- 
totypes  as  necessary.  The  critical  male  genitalia  characters  are  figured.  The  biol- 
ogy of  the  species  and  description  of  the  immature  stages  will  be  published  by 
Graham  Rotheray  and  Geoffroy  Hancock. 

The  format,  methodology,  terminology,  and  other  aspects  of  this  paper  follow 
our  general  standards,  which  are  enumerated  in  detail  in  our  prior  publications 
(see  Marinoni  and  Thompson,  2004).  Author  FCT  maintains  a  system  of  infor- 
mal nomenclature  for  "morpho-species."  When  we  know  that  something  repre- 
sents a  species,  but  do  not  know  the  name,  we  either  assign  a  Year-Sequence 
number,  such  as  73-2,  or  a  CR-sequence  for  the  Costa  Rican  Biodiversity  inven- 
tory project.  These  numbers  are  all  represented  by  vouchers  here  at  the  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  and  these  numbers  are  provided  to  users,  just  like  names. 
These  numbers  get  published  sometimes  and  are  used,  for  example,  in  database, 
such  as  INBio's  ATTA  system.  Hence,  author  FCT  reports  them  in  his  papers 
when  the  identity  was  finally  resolved.  On  the  Literature  Cited,  the  bracketed 
codes  at  the  end  of  each  citation  represent  precise  dates  of  publication.  The  for- 
mat of  those  codes  is  [year.month.day].  The  question  mark  means  unknown.  This 
practice  is  becoming  more  common  amongst  dipterists. 

Copestylum  Macquart  is  undoubtedly  the  largest  genus  of  flower  flies  in  the 
World.  While  in  terms  of  the  number  of  species  described  to  date,  Cheilosia 
Meigen,  a  mainly  old  world  (Palaearctic)  taxon,  contains  some  410  species,  the 


1  Received  on  August  28,  2002.  Accepted  on  September  1 ,  2002. 

2 Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  ARS,  USDA;NHB-16S  Smithsonian  Institution;  Washington. 
District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  E-mail:  cthompsow  sel.barc.usdad.gov. 

1  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Universidade  Federal  do  Parana,  Curitiba.  Parana,  Brazil.  E-mail: 
lmarinoni@ufpr.br. 

Mailed  on  August  25.  2004 


2 1 8  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


New  World  endemic  group,  Copestylum,  contains  315  described  species,  as  well 
as  more  than  100  known,  but  currently  undescribed  species. 

The  current  concept  of  Copestylum  is  very  broad  and  covers  a  diverse  array  of 
adult  forms,  essentially  any  New  World  species  with  a  plumose  arista  and  bris- 
tles (see  Thompson  (1999)  for  a  key  to  the  Neotropical  genera;  Vockeroth  and 
Thompson  (1987)  for  a  key  to  Nearctic  genera).  Most  of  the  species  fall  into  a 
number  of  well  defined  groups  based  on  adult  characters.  While  C.  circudatum 
does  not  fall  into  a  group  defined  by  autamorphies,  the  species  does  belong  to  a 
phenetic  group  defined  by  the  following  shared  character  states:  Cell  Rl  broad- 
ly open  apically;  bristles  all  black;  scutellum  with  a  pre-apical  depression,  but 
without  basolateral  flattened,  rugose  areas;  scutum  without  any  pre-scutellar 
bristles;  anepisternum  bare  anteriorly,  and  katepimeron  bare.  Copestylum  cir- 
cumdatum  differs  from  all  other  species  in  this  group  by  the  following  combina- 
tion of  characters;  face  with  median  black  vitta,  broadly  yellow  laterally;  legs 
partially  pale,  usually  with  coxae  yellow;  scutum  generally  black  (not  entirely 
pale),  scutellum  pale  along  base  and  marginally;  calypter  with  margin  and  fringe 
black.  Closely  related  species  are  diagnosed  below. 

Copestylum  circumdatum  (Walker,  1857) 

(Figures  1-5) 

Temnocera  circumdata  Walker,  1857:  154.  Type-locality.  Brazil  [as  "Valley  of  Amazon"].  Lectotype 
9  BMNH  here  designated.  Fluke  1957:  156  (species  incertae  scdis). 

Volucella  circumdata.  Kertesz  1910:  188  (combination). 
Copestylum  circumdatum.  Thompson  et  alia  1976:  73  (combination). 

Volucella  mus  Williston,  1888:  274.  Type-locality:  Brazil,  Mato  Grosso,  Chapada.  Lectotype  Cf 
AMNH  here  designated.  Kertesz  1910:  195  (citation);  Sack  1921:  137  (Bolivia,  biology,  imma- 
tures,  fig.  10  (puparium),  fig.  1  Ic  (anterior  spiracular  process);  Curran  1926:  52  (key  ref.),  1930: 
7  (key  ref.),  1934:  380  (key  ref.),  1939:  2  (key  ref);  Fluke  1957:  76  (catalog  citation). 

Copestylum  mus.  Thompson  et  alia  1976:  79  (combination). 
Copest\'lum  73-2 
Copestylum  CR-43 

Head  (Fig.  2).  Face  shiny,  yellow  with  a  dark  brown  medium  vitta  ventrad  to  antenna  and  nar- 
rowly brown  laterally,  white  pilose;  gena  brown  except  yellow  medially,  [thus  there  is  a  broad  brown 
vitta  from  eye  margin  to  oral  margin  partially  on  face  and  gena],  short  white  pilose  posteriorly;  lunule 
yellow  except  narrowly  brown  along  posterior  margin;  frontal  triangle  yellow,  white  pilose;  frons 
yellow  except  for  a  triangular  brown  macula  dorsad  to  lunule  on  ventral  1/2  or  less;  vertical  triangle 
black,  black  pilose;  vertex  dark  brown,  shiny,  black  pilose;  occiput  black  except  yellow  on  ventral 
1/5,  white  pollinose,  white  pilose  except  black  on  dorsal  1/8;  antenna  yellow  to  orange,  black  pilose; 
basoflagellomere  elongate,  about  three  times  as  long  as  wide;  arista  orange  on  basal  2/3,  dark  api- 
cally, with  black  rays. 

Thorax  (Fig.  3).  Postpronotum  yellow,  white  pilose;  scutum  bluish  black  except  broadly  yellow 
laterally,  except  notopleuron  brownish  laterally,  narrowly  yellow  anterior  scutellum  in  females,  some 
individual  also  with  yellow  lateral  areas  mesial  to  wing  with  brown  vitta,  white  pilose  with  inter- 
mixed black  pile;  bristles  black,  2  notopleurals,  3  supra-alars  with  anterior  most  weak,  about  1/2  size 
of  posterior  supra-alar,  3  postalar  callars,  no  pre-scutellars,  3  marginal  scutellars,  one  anepisternal; 
scutellum  with  apicomedial  depression,  yellow,  with  a  narrow  transverse  brown  fascia,  black  pilose 


Vol.  114.  No.  4,  September  &  October  2003 


219 


except  bare  on  the  depression,  with  three  pairs  of  long  marginal  bristles;  pleuron  generally  brown  to 
blackish,  white  pilose,  yelllow  on  propleuron,  posterior  anepisternum,  and  anterior  anepimeron; 
katepimeron  bare;  plumula  yellow;  halter  white;  calypter  pale  basally,  becoming  dark  apically,  with 
brown  to  blackish  margin  and  fringe.  Wing:  hyaline  except  stigma  dark  brown  and  costal  margin 
slightly  brownish,  microtrichose  except  bare  base  of  cell  C,  basal  2/3  of  cell  R,  anterobasal  3/4  of  cell 
BM,  all  of  cell  CuP  except  apex,  and  on  anal  lobe  anterior  to  vein  A2;  alula  trichose;  Cell  rl  closed 
at  wing  margin  or  before,  with  or  without  very  short  petiole.  Legs:  dark  brown  to  black,  brown  and 
black  pilose  except  procoxa  white  pilose. 

Abdomen  (Fig.  4).  Brown  to  bluish-black  with  yellow  maculae,  shiny;  1st  tergum  yellow,  white 
pilose;  2nd  tergum  yellow  laterally  and  on  basal  1/3,  dark  elsewhere,  yellowish-white  pilose  on  basal 
1/3,  black  pilose  elsewhere;  3rd  and  4th  terga  bluish-black  except  with  large  basal  yellow  maculae 
on  basal  1/2  and  broadly  separated  medially  by  about  medial  1/4  and  yellow  laterally  or  sublateral- 
ly,  black  pilose  except  yellow  pilose  on  maculae  (males)  or  on  basal  1/3  (females);  sterna  brownish 
to  bluish-black  except  yellow  laterally  on  1st  through  3rd  sterna,  white  pilose  except  black  pilose  on 
4th  sternum  (Cfcf )  or  apical  2/3  (99);  &  genitalia  (Fig.  5)  black,  black  pilose;  cercus  semi-circular; 
postcercal  area  only  slightly  sclerotized;  surstylus  approximately  triangular;  aedeagus  rectangular; 
9th  sternum  with  a  single  apicolateral  bristle,  with  large  lateral  oval  membranous  area;  superior  lobe 
slightly  arcuate;  lingular  area  only  slightly  concave. 


Figs  1-4.  Copestylum  circumdatum  (Walker):  (1)  Adult,  lateral  view; 
(2)  head,  lateral  view;  (3)  thorax,  dorsal  view;  (4)  abdomen,  dorsal  view. 


220 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig  5.  Copest\'lum  circumdatnm  (Walker):  (a)  9th  tergum  and  associated  structures,  lat- 
eral view;  (b)  9th  tergum  and  associated  structures,  dorsal  view;  (c)  9th  sternum  and 
associated  structures,  lateral  view. 


Variation.  As  is  usual  with  Copesftlum  species,  color  develops  and  darkens 
after  the  adult  emerges.  Freshly  emerged  adults  (young  specimens)  appear  paler 
and  more  brownish,  whereas  older  ones  are  more  yellow  and  bluish-black.  Also, 
some  individuals  have  more  extensive  pale  areas. 

Examination  of  specimens  of  C.  circumdatnm  indicates  that  the  extent  of  yel- 
low coloration  on  the  scutum  is  a  factor  of  age  and  individuals.  Freshly  emerged 
specimens  have  the  scutum  extensively  pale,  so  as  to  have  a  large  triangular 
macula  anterior  to  the  scutellum  and  the  lateral  margins  of  the  scutum  broadly 
yellow.  In  older  individuals,  the  scutum  becomes  darker  so  that  the  triangular 
macula  is  reduced  to  a  transverse  fascia  and  the  lateral  margins  become  more 
narrowly  pale  (dark  areas  expand). 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 221 

Types.  Temnocera  circumdata  Walker  was  described  from  an  unspecified 
number  of  specimens  from  the  "Valley  of  Amazon"  in  the  Saunders'  collection, 
which  was  ultimately  donated  to  the  Natural  History  Museum,  London.  A  single 
specimen  remains  there  and  is  labeled  as  follows:  Holotype  (red  circular  NMH 
type  label);  Cotype  (green  circular  BMNH  type  label);  "Amazon,  66.53;"  "Tem- 
nocera circumdata  Wlk"  [E.  Austen's  hand];  and  "Brazil,  Amazon,  H.  W.  Bates, 
66.53."  This  specimen  is  here  designated  as  lectotype  to  fix  the  concept  of  the 
name  and  assure  the  consistent  future  interpretation  of  this  name. 

Volucella  mus  Williston  was  described  from  eleven  specimens  collected  by  H. 
H.  Smith  in  "Chapada,  Brazil."  A  number  of  specimens  agreeing  with  this  data 
are  now  found  in  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  having  been  donat- 
ed by  Williston's  family,  and  another  two  syntypes  are  found  in  the  Cornell 
University  Collection.  Of  these  specimens  a  male  labeled  "Chapada,"  "Type, 
No.,  A.  M.  N.  H."  [red],  "S.  W.  Williston  Collection,"  "Am.  Mus.  Nat.  Hist., 
Dept.  Invert.  Zool.,  No.  19921,"  "Volucella,  mus,  Williston"  [red-bordered  deter- 
mination label]  "Lectotype,  Volucella  mus,  Williston,  Design.  Thompson  2002" 
and  in  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  is  here  designated  as  lectotype 
to  fix  the  concept  of  the  name  and  assure  the  consistent  future  interpretation  of 
this  name. 

Distribution.  Costa  Rica,  Panama,  Suriname,  Trinidad,  Colombia,  Brazil 
(Bahia,  Mato  Grosso,  Parana,  Santa  Catarina),  Peru,  Paraguay,  Bolivia,  Argentina. 

Material  examined  (12  cfcf .  3  1  99).  ARGENTINA.  Corrientes:  Ytuzaingo,  Sep  1982,  M.  Fritz 
(USNM  ENT  00114123  9  USNM).  BOLIVIA.  Beni:  Cavinas,  Jan  1922,  Mulford  Bio  Exp  1921- 
1922,  W.  M.  Mann  (USNM  ENT  00000002  9  USNM).  BRAZIL.  Amazonas/Para:  "Amazon."  H.  W. 
Bates  (Lectotype  circumdata  Walker,  9  BMNH).  Bahia:  Bonfim.  26  Jan  1930,  Davis  and  Shannon 
(USNM  ENT  00000001  Cf  UNSM).  Mato  Grosso:  Maracaju,  May  1937,  Service  de  Febre  Amarela, 
"M.E.S.  Bras."  (USNM  ENT  00000010  Cf  USNM);  Chapada  dos  Guimaraes,  H.  H.  Smith  (lectotype 
and  paralectotypes  of  mus  Williston,  Cf  9  AMNH  and  CU).  Parana:  Fenix,  Reserva  Est  ITCF,  10  Sep 
1986,  Lev.  Ent.  PROFAUPAR.  Malaise  Trap  (9,  DZUP);  Foz  do  Iguacu,  11  Dec  1966.  AExc.  Dep 
Zool.  @  (Cf,  DZUP); ...  18  Feb  1969  (9.  DZUP).  Santa  Catarina:  Nova  Teutonia,  Feb.  Mar,  Apr,  Sep, 
Nov  [various  years  1964-75),  Fritz  Plaumann  (USNM  ENT  00000011-13,  00030703,  00114108-21 
3  Cfcf  14  99  USNM).  COLOMBIA.  Dept.  Meta,  Restrepo,  500  m,  1936,  J.  Bequaert  (USNM  ENT 
00114127  Cf  CNC).  COSTA  RICA.  San  Mateo,  Hiquito,  [no  dates],  Pablo  Schild  (USNM  ENT 
001 14106-7  2  99  USNM);  Puntarenas:  Est.  Quebrada  Bonita,  Crucede  Quebradas  Res.  Biol.  Carara, 
LN  195500  470400,  5  Nov- 13  Dec  1990,  E.  Quesada  (INBIOCRI000302126  9  INBIO).  PANAMA. 
Garun  Lake,  Cano  Saddle,  Jun  1923,  M.  F.  Close  (USNM  ENT  00000000  9  USNM).  PARAGUAY. 
Villarrica,  F.  Schade,  Jun  1937  (USNM  ENT  00000003  9  USNM).  May  1938  (USNM  ENT 

00000008  Cf  USNM),  Nov  1937  (USNM  ENT  00000004-6.  Cf  2  99  USNM),  Dec  1937  (USNM 
ENT  00000007  9  USNM).  PERU.  Loreto:  Iquitos,  Mar-Apr  1931,  R.  Shannon  (USNM  ENT 

00000009  Cf  USNM);  Rio  Momon,  ca  25  km  NW  Iquitos,  13  Feb  1984,  W.  Mathis  (USNM  ENT 
00114126  9  USNM).  Madre  de  Dios:  Manu,  Rio  Mann,  Pakit/a.  250  m,  12  7S  70  58W.  9-23  Sep 
1988,  A.  Freidberg  (USNM  ENT  00114124  Cf  USNM),  W.  Mathis  (USNM  ENT  00114125  9 
USNM).  SURINAME.  Paramaribo,  5  54N  55  7W,  K.  Mayo  (USNM  FNT  0011412S  9  USNM). 
TRINIDAD.  Apr  1997,  G.  Rotheray  (Cf  USNM). 

DISCUSSION 

Curran  (1926,  1930,  1934,  1939),  the  last  worker  to  publish  comprehensive 
keys  of  the  group  now  called  Copestylum.  did  not  recognize  the  name  C.  cir- 


222  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


cumdata  Walker,  as  he  only  worked  from  specimens  previously  identified  in  the 
collection  of  his  museum.  He  simply  ignored  the  descriptions  of  other  species  by 
earlier  authors.  While  Williston  did  attempt  to  decipher  the  species  described  by 
earlier  authors,  he  apparently  was  unable  to  recognize  that  Walker's  description 
of  C.  circumdata  was  the  same  as  the  species  he  described  as  mus.  In  terms  of 
current  taxonomy,  there  is  a  species  called  mus  by  Curran,  whose  senior  syn- 
onym is  C.  circumdata  Walker. 

In  the  last  published  key  to  Copestylum  species  (Curran,  1939),  C.  circumda- 
tum  runs  to  couplet  #35,  mus,  if  the  coxae  are  considered  yellow  (couplet  #28), 
otherwise  it  runs  to  couplet  #45,  contumax.  Copestylum  contumax  (Curran, 
1939)  is  known  from  a  unique  male  specimen  which  has  "unusually  large"  male 
genitalia.  Copestylum  circumdatum  has  small,  normal-sized  male  genitalia,  also 
the  male  frontal  triangle  is  not  produced  and  the  facial  tubercle  is  white  pilose, 
not  black  (contumax).  This  species  differs  from  musana  (Curran,  1930)  in  hav- 
ing the  anepimeron  extensively  yellow  and  entirely  yellow  pilose,  not  black  and 
black  pilose  (musana). 

Footnote.  This  species  is  similar  to  the  species  named  obscurior  by  Curran 
and  so  cataloged  by  Fluke  (1957:  78).  However,  due  to  an  ignorance  of  Latin, 
this  epithet  became  incorrectly  changed  to  obscurius  in  the  Neotropical  Diptera 
catalog  (Thompson,  et  alia  1976:  80). 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Richard  Vane- Wright  and  Nigel  Wyatt,  the  Natural  History  Museum  (formerly  the 
British  Museum  (Natural  History),  London  (BMNH);  E.  Richard  Hoebeke  and  James  K.  Liebherr, 
Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  New  York  (CU);  David  A.  Grimaldi,  the  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  New  York  (AMNH);  Nelson  Papavero  and  Francisca  C.  do  Val,  Museu  de  Zoologia  da 
Universidade  de  Sao  Paulo,  Sao  Paulo  (MZUSP);  J.  Richard  Vockeroth,  Canadian  National 
Collection,  Agriculture  Canada,  Ottawa  (CNC)  for  permission  to  study  material  in  their  care.  Other 
museum  acronyms  used  in  the  text  are  USNM  for  the  Smithsonian  National  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  Washington,  and  DZUP  for  Departamento  de  Zoologia,  Universidade  de  Federal  do  Parana, 
Curitiba.  Taina  Litwak  prepared  the  figures  of  the  male  genitalia.  The  junior  thanks  the  Samuel 
Wendell  Williston  Diptera  Research  Fund  for  providing  support  for  her  visits  to  the  Smithsonian 
Institution. 

We  also  thank  Drs.  Michael  Pogue,  Allen  Norrbom,  and  Michael  Schauff  of  the  Systematic  Ento- 
mology Laboratory,  USDA,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia;  and  Wayne  N.  Mathis  of  National 
Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  for  their  crit- 
ical review  of  the  manuscript. 

This  study  resulted  from  an  investigation  of  the  flower  fly  fauna  of  southeastern  Brazil.  The  jun- 
ior author  initiated  the  faunal  survey  of  this  area,  doing  the  preliminary  sorting  and  identification  to 
morphospecies.  The  senior  author  is  responsible  for  the  taxonomy,  recognizing  that  there  is  a  single 
widespread  species  masquerading  under  various  names.  Together,  we  prepared  this  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Curran,  C.  H.   1 926.  Partial  synopsis  of  American  species  of  Volucclla  with  notes  on  Wiedemann's 
types.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  (Columbus)  19:50-66.  [1926.05.05] 

Curran,  C.  H.   1930.  New  species  of  Volucellinae  from  America  (Syrphidae,  Diptera).  American 
Musem  Novitates  (New  York)  413.  23  pp.  [1930.03.24] 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 223 


Curran,  C.  H.  1934.  Diptera  of  Kartabo,  Bartica  District,  British  Guiana.  Bulletin  of  the  American 
Museum  of  Natural  History  (New  York)  66:287-532.  [1934.07.30] 

Curran,  C.  H.  1939.  Synopsis  of  the  American  species  of  Volucella  (Syrphidae;  Diptera).  Part  I. 
Table  of  Species.  American  Museum  Novitates  (New  York,  NY,  USA)  1027.  7  pp.  [1939.05.29] 

Fluke,  C.  L.  1956-57.  Catalogue  of  the  family  Syrphidae  in  the  Neotropical  Region  (Diptera). 
Revista  Brasileira  de  Entomologia  (Sao  Paulo)  6: 193-268  [1956.12.10]:  7:  1-181.  [1957.06.20]. 

Kertesz,  K.  1910.  Catalogus  dipterorum  hucusque  descriptorum.  Vol.  7,  Syrphidae,  Dorylaide. 
Phoridae,  Clythiidae.  Museum  Nationale  Hungaricum.  Budapestini  (=Budapest).  470  pp. 
[1910.06.??] 

Marinoni,  L.  and  F.  C.  Thompson.  2004.  Flower  flies  of  southeastern  Brazil  (Diptera:  Syrphidae). 
Part  I.  Introduction  and  new  species.  Studia  Dipterologica  10(2):  565-578.  [2004.05.19] 

Sack,  P.  1921.  Dr.  L.  Ziircher's  Dipteren-Ausbeute  aus  Paraguay:  Syrphiden.  Archiv  fur 
Naturgeschichte  (Abteilung  A)  (Berlin,  Germany)  87:127-149.  [1921.??.??] 

Thompson,  F.  C.  1999.  A  key  to  the  genera  of  the  flower  flies  of  the  Neotropical  Region  with  the 
description  of  two  new  genera  and  eight  new  species  and  a  glossary  of  characters  and  terms  used. 
Contribution  on  Entomology,  International  (Gainesville,  Florida,  U.S.A.)  3:318-378. 
[1999.08.23] 

Thompson,  F.  C.,  J.  R.  Vockeroth  and  Y.  S.  Sedman.  1976.  Family  Syrphidae.  Catalogue  of  the 
Diptera  of  the  Americas  south  of  the  United  States  (Sao  Paulo,  Brazil)  46.  195  pp.  [1976.08.09] 

Vockeroth,  J.  R.  and  F.  C.  Thompson.  1987.  Family  Syrphidae.  pp.  52-743.  In,  McAlpine.  J.  F.. 
et  alia  (Editors).  Manual  of  Nearctic  Diptera.  Volume  2,  vi  +  pp.  675-1332.  Research  Branch, 
Agriculture  Canada,  Monograph  28.  [1987.03.31] 

Walker,  F.  1857.  Characters  of  undescribed  Diptera  in  the  collection  of  W.  W.  Saunders,  Esq., 
F.  L.  S.,  etc.  Transaction  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  London  4  (n.s.):l  19-158.  [1857.07.?'.'] 

Williston,  S.  W.  1888.  Diptera  Brasiliana,  ab  H.  H.  Smith  Collecta.  Part  I  —  Stratiomyidae,  Syr- 
phidae. Transaction  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (Philadelphia)  15:243-292. 
[1888.12.??] 


224  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A  CHECKLIST  OF  THE  STONEFLIES  (PLECOPTERA) 

OF  THE  DANIEL  BOONE  NATIONAL  FOREST 

IN  KENTUCKY,  U.S.A.1 

Donald  C.  Tarter2  and  Dwight  L.  Chaffee' 

ABSTRACT:  A  total  of  69  species  representing  nine  families  and  30  genera  of  stoneflies  are  found 
in  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  in  eastern  Kentucky.  Two  hundred  and  fifty-five  new  county 
records  were  identified  from  163  streams  in  21  counties.  Three  new  state  records,  including 
Pteronarcys  biloba  Newman,  Paracapnia  angulata  Hanson,  and  Perlesta  decipiens  (Walsh),  and 
Isoperla  orata  Prison,  were  identified  from  the  study  area. 

KEY  WORDS:  Plecoptera,  stoneflies,  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest,  Kentucky,  U.S.A. 

The  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  was  established  as  the  Cumberland  Na- 
tional Forest  on  February  23, 1937.  The  name  was  officially  changed  on  April  11, 
1966,  to  honor  the  great  Kentucky  Pioneer,  Daniel  Boone  (Collins,  1975).  Previ- 
ously, aspects  of  the  stonefly  fauna  of  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  in  east- 
ern Kentucky  have  been  recorded  by  Picazo  and  DeMoss  (1980),  Tarter  et  al. 
(1982,1984),  Allen  and  Tarter  (1985),  Surdick  (1985),  Kondratieff  and  Kirchner 
( 1 988, 1 996),  and  Pond  ( 1 999).  The  checklist  presented  herein  represents  the  first 
attempt  to  list  the  stoneflies  (nymphs  and  adults)  found  in  the  streams  located  in 
2 1  counties  within  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest.  The  list  indicates  nine  fam- 
ilies, 30  genera,  and  69  species.  Additionally,  255  new  county  records  were  add- 
ed to  the  study  area.  Of  the  known  stonefly  species  in  Kentucky  (91),  76  percent 
were  found  in  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest. 

The  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  is  located  in  the  Cumberland  Plateau  and 
Cumberland  Mountain  region  of  eastern  Kentucky  and  encompasses  approxi- 
mately 849,870  hectares  within  its  proclamation  boundary  (Fig.  1).  The  land  is 
rugged  and  characterized  by  steep  forested  ridges,  narrow  valleys,  and  contains 
approximately  1 1,900  km  of  perennial  streams  and  rivers.  Collections  for  this  in- 
vestigation were  made  from  163  streams.  They  were  taken  mostly  from  stream 
orders  1-3,  and  many  collections  were  taken  from  very  small  unnamed  branches 
and  tributaries.  Stoneflies  and  detailed  data  (streams,  collection  dates,  collector) 
were  deposited  in  the  West  Virginia  Benthological  Survey  at  Marshall  Univer- 
sity. The  following  counties  (21)  have  land  areas  that  are  contained  within  the 
proclamation  boundary  of  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest:  Bath,  Clay,  Estill, 
Harlan,  Jackson,  Knox,  Laurel,  Lee,  Leslie,  McCreary,  Menifee,  Morgan,  Ows- 
ley,  Perry,  Powell,  Pulaski,  Rockcastle,  Rowan,  Wayne,  Whitley,  and  Wolfe. 


1  Received  on  December  6,  2002.  Accepted  on  April  10,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  Marshall  University,  Huntington,  West  Virginia  25755,  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  tarter@marshall.edu. 

'  Forest  Biology  Consultant,  P.O.  Box  XI 4,  Richmond,  Kentucky  40476  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  Auuust  25,  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


225 


Figure  1 .  Map  of  Kentucky  (U.S.A.)  highlighting  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  in  the 
eastern  portion  of  the  state. 


Stoneflies  were  collected  from  the  following  streams  and  rivers  within  three 
drainage  basins  (Cumberland,  Kentucky,  and  Licking  rivers):  Bath  Co.:  Big  Cave 
Run,  Caney  Creek,  Clear  Creek,  Joes  Branch,  Licking  River,  Salt  Lick  Creek. 
Clay  Co.:  Buzzard  Creek,  Red  Bird  River,  Spring  Creek.  Estill  Co.:  Oak  Creek, 
Station  Camp  Creek,  Sudders  Fork.  Harlan  Co.:  Abner  Branch,  Bills  Branch,  Big 
Laurel  Creek,  Little  Laurel  Creek,  Laurel  Fork.  Jackson  Co.:  Brashears  Creek, 
Cavenaugh  Creek,  Horselick  Creek,  Owsley  Fork,  Panther  Creek,  Peter  Branch, 
Raccoon  Creek,  Rockcastle  River,  South  Fork,  War  Fork.  Knox  Co.:  Disappoint- 
ment Creek.  Laurel  Co.:  Cane  Creek,  Hawk  Creek,  Pine  Creek,  Rockcastle  River, 
Wood  Creek.  Lee  Co.:  Little  Sinking  Creek,  Ross  Creek,  Smith  Branch,  Still  water 
Creek,  Sturgeon  Creek.  Leslie  Co.:  Cutshin  Creek,  Elkorn  Creek,  Middle  Fork 
(Kentucky  River),  Sugar  Creek.  McCreary  Co.:  Beaver  Creek,  Cogur  Creek, 
Cumberland  River,  Eagle  Creek,  Indian  Creek,  Marsh  Creek,  Rock  Creek,  Yahoo 
Creek.  Menifee  Co.:  Beaver  Creek,  Clifty  Creek,  Copperas  Creek,  Dunkan 
Branch,  Edwards  Branch,  Gladie  Creek,  Indian  Creek,  Klaber  Branch,  Sal 
Branch,  Sargent  Branch,  Wolfpen  Creek.  Morgan  Co.:  Buckhorn  Creek,  Licking 
River,  Open  Fork,  Yocum  Creek.  Owsley  Co.:  Buck  Creek,  Cow  Creek,  Crane 
Fork,  Wild  Dog  Creek.  Perry  Co.:  Pig  Pen  Branch,  Squabble  Creek,  Stable  Fork. 
Powell  Co.:  Amburgy  Hollow  Branch,  Auxier  Branch,  Fish  Trap  Branch,  Grays 
Branch,  King  Branch,  Mill  Creek,  Nation  Camp  Creek,  Red  River  (Middle  and 
South  Forks),  Rush  Branch,  Upper  Hood  Branch,  Whittlcton  Branch.  Pulaski  Co.: 
Big  Lick  Branch,  Bear  Creek,  Buck  Creek.  Rockcastle  Co.:  Brush  Creek,  Crooked 
Creek,  Rcnfro  Creek,  Rockcastle  River,  Roundstone  Creek,  White  Oak  Creek. 
Rowan  Co.:  Abner  Tackett  Branch,  Claylick  Branch,  Dry  Creek,  Hlk  Lick  Fork, 
Hays  Branch,  Kiser  Branch,  Licking  River,  Logan  Hollow,  Mills  Branch,  Ramey 
Creek,  Scott  Creek,  Slabcamp  Creek,  Sugar  Camp  Creek,  Triplet!  Creek,  White 
Pine  Branch.  Wayne  Co.:  Burnett  Creek,  Little  South  Fork,  Lonesome  Creek. 


226  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Whitley  Co.:  Bark  Camp  Creek,  Brier  Creek,  Cumberland  River,  Dog  Slaughter 
Creek,  Little  Dog  Slaughter  Creek,  Poplar  Creek,  Little  South  Fork.  Wolfe  Co.: 
Chestnut  Log  Branch,  Chimney  Top  Creek,  Laurel  Branch,  Parched  Corn  Creek, 
Red  River  (Middle  and  North  Forks),  Rockbridge  Fork,  Swift  Camp  Creek. 

The  Red  River  Gorge  Geological  Area,  which  is  confined  to  Menifee,  Powell, 
and  Wolfe  counties,  is  a  unique  and  scenic  area  in  the  Daniel  Boone  National 
Forest.  Within  the  Red  River  Gorge  is  an  area  classified  as  the  Clifty  Wilderness 
Area.  These  two  areas  together  form  a  rugged  and  picturesque  forest  area  of 
more  than  10,1 17  ha.  This  gorge  area  features  numerous  stone  arches,  precipitous 
cliffs,  craggy  pinnacles,  cascading  waterfalls,  and  many  other  natural  features 
(McGrain,  1983).  Nine  families,  2  genera,  and  36  species  of  stoneflies  were 
found  in  this  area,  including  three  new  state  records.  The  36  species  comprised 
52  percent  of  the  stoneflies  in  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  and  also  40  per- 
cent of  the  known  species  in  Kentucky. 

The  following  new  state  records  were  identified  from  the  Daniel  Boone 
National  Forest  (M  represents  male  and  F  represents  female):  1)  Pteronarcys 
biloba  Newman  (nymphs)  (Menifee  County/Wolfpen  Creek,  May  23,  2002; 
Wolfe  County /Parched  Corn  Creek,  June  3,  2000,  and  Chimney  Top  Creek,  June 
1,  2000,  and  Rowan  County/Licking  River,  July  3,  2001).  2)  Paracapnia  angu- 
lata  Hanson  (adult/M)  (Powell  County/Amburgy  Hollow  Branch,  March  2, 
1974),  3)  Perlesta  decipiens  (Walsh)  (adults/M,  F)  (Wolfe  County/Red  River 
Gorge,  June  23,  1992). 

Acroneuria  abnormis  was  identified  from  all  21  counties  in  the  study  area, 
while  A.  carolinensis  was  found  in  18  counties  (86  percent).  Two  perlids  have 
their  type-locality  in  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest:  Acroneuria  hitchcocki 
Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  (Rowan  County/Ramey  Creek,  April  30,  1987)  and 
Hansonoperla  hokolesqua  Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  (Rowan  County /Abner 
Tackett  Branch/May  16,  1990).  The  following  sentential  (threatened)  taxa  were 
found  in  the  study  area:  A.  hitchcocki,  Alloperla  hamata  Surdick  and  H.  hoko- 
lesqua. 

Checklist  of  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest  in  Kentucky 

Below  is  a  checklist  of  69  stonefly  species  identified  from  the  Daniel  Boone 
National  Forest.  Counties  of  collection  are  enclosed  in  parenthesis.  New  county 
species  records  are  indicated  with  an  asterisk,  while  new  state  species  records  are 
denoted  by  a  double  asterisk. 

Euholognatha 

Capniidac 

Allocapniu  curiosa  (*Clay,  *Jackson,  *Menifee) 

A.forbesi  Prison  (Lee,  *Rowan) 

A.frisoni  Ross  and  Ricker  (* Rowan) 

A.  granulata  Claassen  (*Laurel,  *Rockcastle) 

A.  indianac  Ricker  (Rowan) 

A.  mystica  Prison  (*McCreary,  *  Morgan) 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 227 


A.  navicola  (Fitch)  (*Clay,  *Estill,  *Jackson,  *Rockcastle) 

A.  ohioenis  Ross  and  Ricker  (Rowan) 

A.  pvgamea  (Burmeister)  (*Clay,  *Estill,  *Leslie,  *Menifee,  *Morgan,  *Powell,  *Rowan, 

"  *Wolfe) 
A.  recta  (Claassen)  (*Estill,  *Jackson,  *Laurel,  *Menifee,  *Morgan,  *McCreary,  Powell, 

*Rockcastle,  *Rowan,*Wolfe) 
A.  rickeri  Prison  (Bath,  *Estill,  *Laurel,  *Lee,  *Menifee,  *Morgan,  *Powell,  *Rockcastle, 

Rowan,  *Wolfe) 
A  vivipara  (Claassen)  (Rowan) 
A.  lola  Ricker  (*Morgan) 
**Paracapnia  angulata  Hanson  (*Jackson,  *Powell) 

Leuctridae 

Leuctra fermginea  (Walker)  (*Knox,  McCreary,  *Powell,  Wolfe) 

L.  rickeri  James  (Menifee,  Rowan) 

L.  sibleyi  Claassen  (Rowan) 

L.  tennis  (Pictet)  (Jackson) 

Paraleuctra  sara  (Claassen)  (*Menifee) 

Zealeuctra  claasseni  (Prison)  (*Morgan) 

Nemouridae 

Amphinemura  delosa  (Ricker)  (*Clay,  *Harlan,  *Knox,  *Lee,  *Leslie,  McCreary,  Menifee, 

*Morgan,  *Owsley,  *Perry,  *Powell,  *Pulaski,  *Rowan,  *Whitley,  *Wolfe) 
A.  nigritta  (Provancher)  (McCreary,  *  Morgan,  Rowan) 
A.  wui  (Claassen)  (McCreary) 
Prostoia  complete!  (Walker)  (*Menifee,  Pulaski) 

P.  similis  (Hagen)  (*Clay,  *Jackson,  *Menifee,  Morgan,  *Powell,  *Rowan) 
Soyedina  vallicularia  (Wu)  (*Powell) 

Taeniopterygidae 

Oemopteryx  contoria  Needham  and  Classen  (*Bell,  *Harlan,  Rowan) 

Strophopteryx  fasciata  (Burmeister)  (*Clay,  Estill,  Jackson.  *Leslie,  *Menifee,   *Morgan, 

*Perry,  *Powell,  *Rowan,  *Wolfe) 
Taeniopteryx  bitrksi  Ricker  and  Ross  (*Clay,  *Estill,  Jackson,  *Laurel,  *Perry,  Rockcastle, 

*  Rowan) 
T.  manra  (Pictet)  (*Clay,  *Estill,  Jackson,  *Leslie,  *Menifee,  *Morgan,  *Owsley,  *Powell, 

*Pulaski,  *Rockcastle,  *Rowan,  Wayne,  *Whitley,  *Wolfe) 
T.   metequi  Ricker  and  Ross  (Jackson,   *Morgan,   *Powell,  Pulaski,   Rockcastle,   *Rowan, 

Whitley,  *  Wolfe) 

Systellognatha 
Chloroperlidae 

Alloperla  chloris  Prison  (Jackson,  Menifee) 

A.  hamata  Surkick  (Rowan) 

A.  idei  (Ricker)  (Morgan) 

A.  imbecilla  (Say)  (Jackson) 

Haploperla  brevis  (Banks)  (Bath,  *Harlan,  *Knox,  *Leslie,  McCreary,  *Menifee,  Morgan, 

*Owsley,  *Powell,  *  Pulaski,  *  Rowan,  Whitley,  Wolfe) 
Sweltsa  onkos  (Ricker)  (*Lee,  *Menifee,  *Powell,  Rowan) 

Peltoperlidae 

Peltoperla  urciuitu  Needham  (*Clay,  *Harlan,  *Jackson,  *Laurel,  *Leslie,  McCreary,  Menifee, 
*Morgan,  *Owsley,  *Powell,  *Rowan,  Wolfe) 

Perlidae 

Acronewia  ahnormis  (Newman)  (Bath,  *Clay,  *Estill.  *Harlan,  *Jackson,  *Knox,  *Laurel. 
*Lee,  *Leslie,  McCreary,  Menifee,  *Morgan,  *Owsley,  *Perry,  Powell,  *Pulaski,  *Rock- 
castle,  *Rowan,  *Wayne,  *Whitley,  *Wolfe) 


228  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


A.  carolinensis  (Banks)  (*Clay,  *Estill,  *Harlan,  Jackson,  *Knox,  *Laurel,  *Lee,  *Leslie, 

*Menifee,    *Morgan,    *Owsley,    *Perry,    *Powell,    *Pulaski,    *Rockcastle,    *Rowan, 

*Whitley,  *  Wolfe) 
A.  filicis  Prison  (Whitley) 
A.  frisoni  Stark  and  Brown  (*Bath,  *Jackson,  *Laurel,  *McCreary,  *Owsley,  *Powell,  *Rock- 

castle,  *Rowan,  *Whitley) 
A.  hitchcocki  Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  (Rowan) 
A.  intemata  (Walker)  (* Wayne) 

A.  lycorias  (Newman)  (McCreary,  *Rockcastle,  *Rowan,  *Whitley) 
A.  perplexa  Prison  (* Jackson) 
Eccoptura  xanthenes  (Newman)  (*Clay,  *Knox,  Laurel,  *Lee,  *Leslie,  *McCreary,  *Menifee, 

*Owsley,  *Powell,  *Pulaski,  *Rockcastle,  *Rowan,  Whitley,  Wolfe) 
Hansonoperla  hokolesqua  Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  (Rowan) 
**Perlesta  decipiens  (Walsh)  (* Wolfe) 
Perlinella  diymo  (Newman)  (Rowan) 
Neoperla  gaufini  Stark  and  Baumann  (*Morgan) 

Agnetina  capitata  (Pictet)  (*Jackson,  *Lee,  *Pulaski,  *  Wayne,  *Whitley) 
A.  flavescens  (Walsh)  (*Harlan,  *  Jackson,  *Rockcastle) 
Pcinigni'tinii  inimarginata  (Say)  (Harlan) 

Perlodidae 

Clioperla  clio  (Newman)  (*Bath,  *Clay,  *Estill,  *Harlan,  *Laurel,  *Lee,  *Leslie,  *Menifee, 

*Morgan,  *Powell,  *Rockcastle,  *Rowan,  *Wayne,  *  Wolfe) 

Diploperla  rohitsta  Stark  and  Gaufin  (*Bath,  *Knox,  *McCreary,  *Morgan,  *Powell,  Rowan) 
Isoperla  burksi  Prison  (Menifee,  *Rowan) 
/.    holochlora   (Klapalek)   (*Bath,   *Harlan,   *Knox,   *Morgan,   *Owsley,   *Perry,   *Powell, 

*Rowan,  *Wolfe) 

/.  namata  Prison  (*Clay,  *Menifee,  *Powell,  Wolfe) 
/.  richardsoni  Prison  (Jackson,  *Menifee) 

/.  similis  (Hagen)  (*Harlan,  *Jackson,  *Knox,  *  Laurel,  McCreary,  *Powell,  Wolfe) 
/.  transmarina  (Newman)  (*Bath,  *Jackson,  Menifee,  *Perry,  *Powell,  Rowan,  *  Wolfe) 
Malirekus  hastatus  (Banks)  (*Harlan,  *Knox,  *Leslie,  McCreary,  *Menifee,  *Perry,  *Powell, 

*  Rowan) 
Remains  bilobatus  (Needham  and  Claassen)  (*Bath,  *Harlan,  McCreary,  *Menifee,  *Morgan, 

*Powell,  *Rowan,  *Wolfe) 
Yiigus  kirchneri  Nelson  (*Harlan,  *Knox,  *Morgan,  *Perry) 

Pteronarcyidae 

**PtL'mnarcys  biloba  Newman  (*Menifee,  *  Rowan,  *  Wolfe) 

P.  comstocki  Smith  (Jackson) 

P.  dorsata  (Say)  (Rowan) 

P.  proteus  Newman  (*Harlan,  *Knox,  *McCreary,  *Menifee,  *Perry,  *Powell,  *Rowan,  Wolfe) 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Dr.  Charles  H.  Nelson,  Department  of  Biological  and  Environmental  Sciences,  Univer- 
sity of  Tennessee  at  Chattanooga,  for  taxonomic  confirmations  of  several  stoneflies  and  helpful  pre- 
publication  review.  We  appreciate  the  comments  from  the  pre-publication  review  of  the  manuscript 
from  Dr.  Dean  Adkins,  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  Marshall  University.  We  thank  Dr.  Boris 
Kondratieff,  Colorado  State  University,  and  Mr.  Ralph  Kirchner,  U.S.  Army  Corps  of  Engineers, 
Huntington  District,  for  stonefly  records  and  several  taxonomic  confirmations  of  adult  stonetlies  and 
careful  review  of  the  earlier  drafts  of  this  paper.  We  thank  Dr.  Sean  O'Keefe,  Morehead  State  Uni- 
versity, for  loan  of  stoneflies.  Additionally,  we  are  grateful  to  Mr.  James  Robinson,  Applied  Science 
Corporation,  Lexington,  Kentucky,  for  loan  of  stonetlies.  Special  thanks  to  Monica  Shafer  for  typing 
the  manuscript. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 229 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Allen,  B.  L.  and  D.  C.  Tarter.  1985.  Life  history  and  ecology  of  Eccopturci  xanthenes  (Newman) 
(Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  from  a  small  Kentucky  stream.  Transactions  of  the  Kentucky  Academy  of 
Sciences  46:  87-91. 

Collins,  R.  F.  1975.  A  history  of  the  Daniel  Boone  National  Forest.  Chapter  32  (pages  242-250) 
USDA  publication  (E.  Edison,  Editor).  Lexington,  Kentucky,  U.S.A.  349  pp. 

Kondraticff,  B.  C.  and  R.  F.  Kirchner.  1988.  A  new  species  of  Acroneuria  from  Kentucky 
(Plecoptera:  Perlidae)  and  new  records  of  stoneflies  from  eastern  North  America.  Journal  of  the 
Kansas  Entomological  Society  61:201-207. 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.  and  R.  F.  Kirchner.  1996.  Two  new  species  of  Hansonoperla  (Plecoptera: 
Perlidae)  from  eastern  North  America.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  8:501- 
509. 

McGrain,  P.  1983.  The  geologic  story  of  Kentucky.  Kentucky  Geological  Survey  (Series  XI). 
Special  Publication  8.  74  pp. 

Picazo,  E.  P.  and  G.  L.  DeMoss.  1980.  The  aquatic  insects,  exclusive  of  Diptera,  of  Hays  Branch. 
Rowan  County,  Kentucky.  Transactions  of  the  Kentucky  Academy  of  Sciences  41:99-104. 

Pond,  G.  J.  1999.  New  records  of  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  from  Kentucky.  Entomological  News 
11:315-316. 

Surdick,  R.  F.  1985.  Nearctic  genera  of  Cholorperlinae  (Plecoptera:  Choloroperlidae).  Illinois 
Biological  Monograaphs  54:1-46. 

Tarter,  D.  C.,  D.  A.  Adkins,  K.  B.  Benson,  and  C.  V.  Covell,  Jr.  1982.  A  preliminary  checklist  of 
the  stoneflies  (Plecoptera)  of  Kentucky.  Transactions  of  the  Kentucky  Academy  of  Sciences 

43:138-141. 

Tarter,  D.  C.,  D.  A.  Adkins,  and  C.  V.  Covell,  Jr.  1984.  A  checklist  of  the  stoneflies  of  Kentucky. 
Entomological  News  95:113-116. 


230  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NEW  RECORDS  OF  MAYFLIES  (EPHEMEROPTERA) 
FROM  ALBERTA,  CANADA1 

J.  M.  Webb:  and  W.  P.  McCafferty' 

ABSTRACT:  Eleven  species  of  Ephemeroptera  are  reported  from  Alberta  for  the  first  time.  Among 
them,  the  reports  ofAmetropus  ammophilus  and  Baetisca  columbiana  also  represent  the  first  records 
from  Canada.  The  validity  of  B.  columbiana  and  the  status  of  the  genus  Baetisca  in  western  North 
America  are  discussed.  A  total  of  122  mayfly  species  are  now  known  from  Alberta. 

KEY  WORDS:  Ephemeroptera,  mayflies,  Alberta  (Canada),  new  records. 

In  their  compendium  of  Canada  mayflies,  McCafferty  and  Randolph  (1998) 
reported  102  species  of  mayflies  from  Alberta,  Canada.  Jacobus  and  McCafferty 
(2001)  reported  an  additional  nine  species  [although  Pseudocloeon  dardamim 
(McDunnough)  was  previously  reported  from  Alberta  by  Soluk  (1981 )],  and  Sun 
et  al.  (2002)  described  a  new  species  from  southern  Alberta.  A  previous  report  of 
Baetisca  obesa  (Say)  from  Alberta  by  Lehmkuhl  (1972)  is  applicable  to  B.  lau- 
rentina  McDunnough  (Pescador  and  Berner  1981)  and  should  not  be  included  in 
the  Alberta  species  list.  This  brought  the  total  number  of  species  known  from  Al- 
berta prior  to  this  study  to  111.  Herein,  we  report  an  additional  1 1  species.  Collec- 
tions were  made  by,  and  are  in  the  possession  of,  JMW,  unless  otherwise  indicat- 
ed as  being  deposited  in  the  Purdue  Entomological  Research  Collection  (PERC). 

Ametropodidae 

Ametropm  ammophilus  Allen  and  Edmunds.  Material  examined:  20  larvae, 
Wapiti  R.  at  Hwy  40,  IX-4-2001;  2  larvae,  Wapiti  R.  at  Hwy  13,  IX-5-2001. 

Baetidae 

Baetis  brunneicolor  McDunnough.  Material  examined:  3Cf  and  39  imagos, 
Bigoray  R,  VIII- 15- 1973,  no  collector  indicated  (PERC). 

Fallceon  quilleri  (Dodds).  Material  examined:  4  larvae,  Milk  R  north  of  Aden, 
VII-3 1-1999;  3  larvae,  1  cf  subimago,  South  Saskatchewan  R  at  Hwy  879, 
VII-3 1-1999,  VIII-1-1999;  2  Cf  imagos,  Red  Deer  R,  VII-7-2003. 

Heterocloeon  anoka  (Daggy).  Material  examined:  1  larva,  Athabasca  R  at  junc- 
tion with  Calling  R,  IX- 10-2001;  1  larva,  Milk  R  north  of  Aden,  VII-3 1-1 999. 
The  taxonomic  status  of  the  species  [formerly  considered  a  synonym  of 

Plauditus  punctiventris  (McDunnough)]  will  be  elaborated  on  elsewhere  by 

R.  D.  Waltz  and  WPM. 


1  Received  on  February  24,  2003.  Accepted  on  March  27,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana,  U.S.A.  47907.  E-mail: 
jmw975(ft!yahoo.com.  Corresponding  Author. 

'Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  West  Lafayette,  Indiana,  U.S.A.  47907.  E-mail: 
pat_mccafferty@entm. purdue.edu. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 231 

Baetiscidae 

Baetisca  columbiana  Edmunds.  Material  examined:  1  larva,  Muskeg  R  57°07'N 
1 1 1°38'  VII- 16- 1976,  D.  R.  Barton  (PERC). 

Baetisca  columbiana  was  definitively  known  only  from  the  single  larval  holo- 
type  specimen  collected  by  J.  J.  Davis  in  1948  from  the  Columbia  River  in 
Franklin  County,  Washington  (Edmunds  1960).  Pescador  and  Berner  (1981)  re- 
peated the  species  description  in  their  revision  of  the  genus  Baetisca  Walsh,  but 
did  not  comparatively  treat  or  key  the  species,  doubting  its  legitimacy  and  indi- 
cating that  the  single  specimen  on  which  the  original  description  was  based  had 
been  lost.  Pescador  and  Berner  (1981)  also  did  not  believe  that  any  Baetisca 
occurred  west  of  the  Continental  Divide  in  North  America,  discounting  reports 
of  the  genus  by  Eaton  (1885)  and  Edmunds  (1960)  as  being  due  to  mislabeling 
of  specimens.  Since  that  time,  however,  B.  lacustris  McDunnough  has  been  col- 
lected in  Nevada  (Baumann  and  Kondratieff  2000)  and  Idaho  (Lester  et  al.  2002), 
and  based  on  information  from  D.  Goodger  of  the  British  Museum  (pers. 
comm.),  we  consider  the  historical  record  of  B.  obesa  (Say)  from  California  by 
Eaton  (1885)  to  be  a  misidentification  of  B.  lacustris. 

We  recently  confirmed  the  presence  of  the  holotype  of  B.  columbiana  in  the 
California  Academy  of  Sciences  and  can  confirm  the  distinctiveness  of  the 
species.  Another  larval  specimen  of  B.  columbiana  was  recently  made  available 
to  us  by  G.  Lester  of  Moscow,  Idaho.  Unfortunately,  there  were  no  specific  locale 
data  associated  with  the  latter  specimen,  although  according  to  Lester  (pers. 
comm.),  it  presumably  came  from  the  Snake  River  in  eastern  Idaho. 

A  previous  report  of  B.  columbiana  from  Alberta  by  Barton  (1980)  was  reject- 
ed by  Pescador  and  Berner  (1981),  who  considered  the  material  on  which  it  was 
based  to  represent  an  aberrant  larval  variant  of  B.  laurentina.  Our  data  here  and 
the  fact  that  the  so-called  variant  of  B.  laurentina  is  morphologically  similar  to 
B.  columbiana  suggest  that  the  Barton  report  was  possibly  valid. 


Caenidae 

Brachycercus  edmundsi  Soldan.  Material  examined:  7  cf  imagos.  Red  Deer  R, 
VH-7-2003. 

Brachycercus prudens  (McDunnough).  Material  examined:  6  larvae.  Red  Deer 
R.  atHwy41,  VIII-3-1999;  11  larvae.  Milk  R.  north  of  Aden,  VII-3 1-1999. 

Heptageniidae 

Heptagenia  pullii  (Clemens).  Material  examined:  8  larvae,  Athabasca  R  at  junc- 
tion with  Calling  R,  IX- 10-2001;  7  larvae.  South  Saskatchewan  R  at  Hwy 
879,  VIII-3 1-1999. 


232  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Leucrocuta  maculipennis  (Walsh).  Material  examined:  6  larvae,  South 
Saskatchewan  R  at  Hwy  879,  VII 1-1-1999;  1  larva,  Red  Deer  R  at  Jenner 
Bridge,  VII-9-2003. 

Leptohyphidae 

Asioplax  edmundsi  (Allen).  Material  examined:  1  larva,  Red  Deer  R.  at  Hwy  41, 
Vm-3-1999. 

Oligoneuriidae 

Lachlania  saskatchewanensis  Ide.  Material  examined:  21  larvae,  Milk  R.  north 
of  Aden,  VH-3 1-1999. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Special  thanks  are  extended  to  Robert  Zuparko  (San  Francisco,  CA)  for  loaning  the  holotype  of 
B.  cohimbiana  as  well  as  to  Luke  Jacobus,  Michael  Meyer,  and  Kyle  Schrepp  (West  Lafayette,  IN) 
for  their  assistance.  This  research  was  supported  in  part  by  NSF  grant  DEB-9901577. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Barton,  D.  R.  1980.  Observations  on  the  life  histories  and  biology  of  Ephemeroptera  and  Plecop- 
tera  in  northeastern  Alberta.  Aquatic  Insects  2:97-1 1 1. 

Baumann,  R.  W.  and  B.  C.  Kondratieff.  2000.  A  confirmed  record  of  the  Ephemeroptera  genus 
Baetisca  from  west  of  the  continental  divide  and  an  annotated  list  of  the  mayflies  of  the  Hum- 
boldt  River,  Nevada.  Western  North  American  Naturalist  60:459-461. 

Eaton,  A.  E.  1883-88.  A  revisional  monograph  of  recent  Ephemeridae  or  mayflies.  Transactions  of 
the  Linnean  Society  of  London  Series  3:1-352. 

Edmunds,  G.  F.,  Jr.  1960.  The  mayfly  genus  Baetisca  in  western  North  America.  The  Pan-Pacific 
Entomolologist  36:102-104. 

Jacobus,  L.  M.  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2001.  Additions  to  the  Canadian  Ephemeroptera.  Journal 
of  the  New  York  Entomological  Society  109:  367-371. 

Lehmkuhl,  D.  M.  1972.  Baetisca  (Ephemeroptera:  Baetiscidae)  from  the  western  interior  of  Can- 
ada with  notes  on  the  life  cycle.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  50:1015-1017. 

Lester,  G.  T.,  W.  P.  McCafferty,  and  M.  R.  Edmondson.  2002.  New  mayfly  (Ephemeroptera) 
records  from  Idaho.  Entomological  News  113:131-136. 

McCafferty,  W.P.  and  R.  P.  Randolph.  1998.  Canada  mayflies:  a  faunistic  compendium.  Proceed- 
ing of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Ontario  129:47-97. 

Pescador,  M.  L.  and  L.  Berner.  1 98 1 .  The  mayfly  family  Baetiscidae  (Ephemeroptera).  Part  II  bio- 
systematics  of  the  genus  Baetisca.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  107:163- 

228. 

Soluk,  D.  A.  1981.  The  larva  of  Buctis  lUinlunm  McDunnough  (Ephemeroptera:  Baelidae).  Ento- 
mological News  92: 1 47- 151. 

Sun,  L.,  J.  M.  Webb,  and  W.  P.  McCafferty.  2002.  Cercohnichys  crec:  a  new  species 
(Ephemeroptera:  Caenidae)  from  western  North  America.  Entomological  News  1 13:80-86. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


233 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

TRIACANTHAGYNA  TRIFIDA  (ODONATA:  AESHNIDAE): 

NEW  STATE  RECORD  OF  DRAGONFLY 

FROM  SOUTH  CAROLINA,  U.S.A.1 

R.A.  Jenkins2  and  J.M.  Jenkins 

Prior  to  this  report,  109  dragonfly  (Odonata)  species  were  known  in  South 
Carolina  (R.  Mancke,  pers.  comm.).  On  August  14,  2003,  a  female  of  Triacan- 
thagyna  trifida  (Aeshnidae)  (Fig.  1),  the  phantom  darner,  was  captured  at  Clem- 
son  University's  Sandhill  Research  and  Education  Center  (REC)  in  Richland 
County,  Columbia,  South  Carolina.  This  represents  the  first  record  of  occurrence 
for  T.  trifida  in  South  Carolina.  In  the  United  States,  this  species  was  previously 
known  only  from  Florida,  Georgia,  and  North  Carolina  (Needham  et  al.  2000). 
The  species  seems  most  common  in  Florida,  but  records  such  as  this  one  suggest 
some  northward  shift  in  distribution.  In  North  Carolina,  T.  trifida  is  known  from 
Carteret,  Craven,  and  Fender  Counties  (N.  Donnely,  pers.  comm.).  Further,  T.  tri- 
fida is  known  to  be  coastal  in  distribution,  and  this  specimen  was  captured  far- 
ther inland  than  previously  known(R.  Mancke,  pers.  comm.). 


Figure  1.   Triacanthagyna  trifida  prior  to  capture  on  August  14,  2003.  Photo  by  Jack  Jenkins. 


1  Received  on  March  10,  2004.  Accepted  on  March  26,  2004. 

'Department  of  Forest  Resources,  Clemson  University,  261   Lehotsky  Hall,  Clemson,  SC  29634. 
U.S.A.  E-mail:  robertjto  clemson.edu. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


234  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Members  of  the  genus  Triacanthagyna  are  restricted  to  the  Neotropics,  with 
the  exception  of  T.  trifida  and  T.  septima  (Needham  et  al.  2000).  The  former  is  the 
only  member  of  its  genus  known  to  occur  in  the  continental  United  States.  Tria- 
canthagyna trifida  is  further  differentiated  from  T.  septima  by  having  dark  legs 
and  abdomen,  the  anterior  margin  of  the  frons  abruptly  convex  to  angulate,  and 
dark  markings  on  the  thorax  (Needham  et  al.  2000).  The  genus  Triacanthagyna 
is  distinguished  by  having  two  rows  of  cells  between  Ml  and  M2,  beginning 
beyond  the  proximal  end  of  the  pterostigma  in  the  hindwing.  Females  have  a 
three-spined  process  on  the  sternum  of  abdominal  segment  10  (Needham  et  al. 
2000),  making  field  identification  easy  with  the  use  of  a  hand  lens.  This  specimen 
is  deposited  in  the  Clemson  University  Arthropod  Collection. 

This  specimen  probably  was  not  the  only  conspecific  in  the  immediate  area.  It 
was  teneral  (not  fully  sclerotized)  and  retained  its  cerci.  Insects  need  time  for  the 
hardening  of  the  exoskeleton  after  molting,  and  female  Triacanthagyna  species 
eventually  lose  their  cerci  with  age  (Dunkle  2000).  Eye  marks  are  punctures  in 
the  compound  eyes  left  by  the  males  clasping  the  females  by  the  head  during 
mating  behavior.  Prereproductive  females  of  Triacanthagyna  also  can  show  eye 
marks  (Dunkle  1979).  Eye  marks  were  absent  on  this  particular  insect,  further 
supporting  our  hypothesis  that  the  specimen  was  a  young  adult.  The  above  obser- 
vations suggest  the  recent  emergence  of  the  specimen  and  perhaps  its  siblings  on 
the  property  and  the  presence  of  at  least  one  other  conspecific  female  that 
oviposited  in  the  vicinity. 

Triacanthagyna  trifida  favors  temporary  forest  pools  for  its  breeding.  The 
adult  flight  season  extends  from  July  until  February,  with  late-flying  individuals 
surviving  frosts  due  to  their  preference  for  woodland  habitats  (Dunkle  2000). 
Found  within  the  Fall  Line  Sandhills,  Sandhill  REC  has  been  influenced  largely 
by  agriculture  and,  in  recent  years,  urban  development.  However,  favorable  habi- 
tats for  T.  trifida  do  occur  on  the  property.  The  presence  of  T.  trifida  at  Sandhill 
REC  in  Columbia,  South  Carolina,  suggests  the  same  in  places  farther  north  and 
inland  than  once  thought. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  thankful  for  Dr.  Peter  Adler  (Clemson  University)  who  provided  help  with  the  preparation 
of  this  note.  We  also  wish  to  thank  Naturalist  Rudy  Mancke  (Universtiy  of  South  Carolina)  and  Dr. 
Mac  Horton  (Clemson  University's  Sandhill  Research  and  Education  Center)  for  their  support  of  our 
passion  for  dragonflies. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Dunkle,  S.  W.   1979.  Ocular  mating  marks  in  female  Nearctic  Aeshnidae  (Anisoptera).  Odonato- 
logica  8:123-127. 

Dunkle,  S.  W.  2000.  Dragonflies  through  Binoculars.  Oxford  University  Press,  New  York.  New 
York,  U.S.A.  248  pp. 

Needham,  .1.  G.,  M.  J.  Westfall  Jr.,  and   L.  M.  May.  2000.   Dragonflies  of  North  America. 
Scientific  Publishers,  Gainesville,  Florida,  U.S.A.  939  pp. 


Vol.  114,  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 


235 


SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

FIRST  RECORD  OF  DASYCORIXA  RAWSONI 
(HEMIPTERA:  CORIXIDAE)  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES' 

Bruce  A.  Hanson3,  Ned  H.  Euliss,  Jr.2,  David  M.  Mushet2,  and  Steve  W.  Chordas  III' 

Hungerford  (1948)  described  the  genus  Dasycorixa  in  his  monograph  of  the 
Corixidae  of  the  Western  Hemisphere.  This  genus  contains  the  three  species 
Dasycorixa  hybrida  (Hungerford  1926),  Dasycorixa  johanseni  (Wai ley,  1931), 
and  Dasycorixa  rawsoni  (Hungerford  1948),  all  of  which  are  known  from  Can- 
ada. Prior  to  this  paper,  only  one  Dasycorixa  species  (D.  hybrida)  was  known 
from  the  United  States.  The  purpose  of  this  note  is  to  report  an  additional  Dasy- 
corixa species  (D.  rawsoni,  Fig.  1 )  as  a  new  country  record  for  the  United  States. 

Types  of  Dasycorixa  rawsoni  collected  from  Lizard  Lake  in  Saskatchewan, 
Canada,  on  August  10,  1938,  were  archived  in  the  Francis  Huntington  Snow 
Entomological  collection,  University  of  Kansas.  This  species  has  been  collected 
in  Alberta,  British  Columbia,  Manitoba,  and  the  Northwest  Territories. 


* 


5  mm 


1 


Fig.  1.  Dorsal  view  of  Dasycorixa  rawsoni  (Hungerford  1948). 


1  Received  on  August  16,  2002.  Accepted  on  March  1 3,  2004. 

:U.  S.  Geological  Survey.  Northern  Prairie  Wildlife  Research  C 'enter,  S71I  37th  Street  SH.  James- 
town, North  Dakota  58401,  U.S.A.  H-mail  of  author  BAH:  hruce  hansonto  usgs.gov. 

'The  Ohio  State  University,  Museum  of  Biological  Diversity,  1315  Kinnear  Road,  Columbus,  Ohio 
43212,  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


236  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


In  July  1999,  we  collected  two  males  of  D.  rawsoni  at  the  Cottonwood  Lake 
Study  Area.  This  area  is  located  in  Stutsman  County,  North  Dakota,  and  was 
described  by  Swanson  (1978).  Voucher  specimens  are  archived  in  the  aquatic 
invertebrate  collection  at  the  U.S.  Geological  Survey,  Northern  Prairie  Wildlife 
Research  Center  in  Jamestown,  North  Dakota.  Both  specimens  were  captured 
using  a  funnel  trap  (Swanson  1978)  set  in  84  cm  deep  water  in  the  deep  marsh 
zone  (open  water  phase)  of  a  semipermanent  wetland  (Stewart  and  Kantmd 
1971).  At  the  time  of  sampling,  water  temperature  was  260  C,  and  the  specific 
conductance  was  2250  uS  cm-1.  Aquatic  plants  in  the  vicinity  of  the  capture  site 
included  sago  pondweed  [Stuckenia  pectinatm  (L.)  Boerner],  shortspike  water 
milfoil  (Myriophyllwn  sibiricum  Komarov),  coontail  (Ceratophyllum  demersum 
L.),  star  duckweed  (Lemna  trisulca  L.),  and  broad-leaved  cattail  (Typha  latifolia 
L.).  As  is  typical  for  the  prairie  pothole  region,  this  wetland  fluctuates  between 
wet  and  dry  phases,  but  it  was  in  lake  phase  (van  der  Valk  and  Davis  1978)  and 
had  a  maximum  water  depth  of  3.55  m  when  we  collected  the  two  specimens  of 
D.  rawsoni.  The  hydrologic  setting,  geology,  water  chemistry,  and  wetland  plant 
communities  of  focal  wetlands  at  the  Cottonwood  Lake  Study  Area  have  been 
described  by  Winter  and  Carr  (1980),  Swanson  (1990),  LaBaugh  et  al.  (1996), 
and  Poiani  et  al.  (1996),  respectively. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Jane  E.  Austin,  Lawrence  D.  Igl,  and  Dale  A.  Wrubleski  for  reviewing  the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Hungerford,  H.  B.  1948.  The  Corixidae  of  the  Western  Hemisphere.  University  of  Kansas  Science 
Bulletin  32:827. 

LaBaugh,  J.  W.,  T.  C.  Winter,  G.  A.  Swanson,  D.  O.  Rosenberry,  R.  D.  Nelson,  and  N.  H.  Euliss 

Jr.    1996.  Changes  in  atmospheric  patterns  affect  midcontinent  wetlands  sensitive  to  climate. 
Limnology  and  Oceanography  41:864-870. 

Poiani,  K.  A.,  W.  C.  Johnson,  G.  A.  Swanson,  and  T.  C.  Winter.  1 996.  Climate  change  and  north- 
ern prairie  wetlands.  Limnology  and  Oceanography  41:871-881. 

Stewart,  R.  E.  and  H.  A.  Kantrud.  1971.  Classification  of  natural  ponds  and  lakes  in  the  glaciat- 
ed prairie  region.  U.S.  Fish  and  Wildlife.  Service,  Resource  Publication  No.  92.  57  pp. 

Swanson,  G.  A.  1978.  Funnel  trap  for  collecting  littoral  aquatic  invertebrates.  Progressive  Fish- 
Culturist40:73. 

Swanson,  G.  A.  1987.  An  introduction  to  the  Cottonwood  Lake  area.  Proceedings  of  the  North 
Dakota  Academy  of  Science  41:25. 

Swanson,  K.  D.  1990.  Chemical  evolution  of  ground  water  in  clay  till  in  a  prairie  wetlands  setting 
in  the  Cottonwood  Lake  area,  Stutsman  County,  North  Dakota.  M.S.  Thesis.  University  Wiscon- 
sin, Madison.  229  pp. 

van  der  Valk,  A.  G.  and  C.  B.  Davis.  1978.  The  role  of  seed  banks  in  the  vegetation  dynamics  of 
prairie  glacial  marshes.  Ecology  59:322-335. 

Winter,  T.  C.  and  M.  R.  Carr.  1980.  Hydrologic  setting  of  wetlands  in  the  Cottonwood  Lake  area, 
Stutsman  County,  North  Dakota.  U.S.  Geological  Survey.  Water  Resources  Investigation  8-99. 


Vol.  114.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 237 

BOOK  REVIEW 

QUALITY  CONTROL  AND  PRODUCTION  OF  BIOLOGICAL  CONTROL 
AGENTS.  THEORY  AND  TESTING  PROCEDURES.  J.  C.  van  Lenteren 
[Editor].  2003.  CABI  Publishing.  44  Brattle  Street,  4th  Floor,  Cambridge,  MA 
02138  United  States.  327  pp.  Hardcover  $US  195.00  (approximately). 

The  use  of  biological  control  agents  or  natural  enemies  is  increasing  worldwide  in  horticultural 
cropping  systems.  The  success  of  a  biological  control  program  is  strongly  correlated  with  the  quali- 
ty of  the  natural  enemies  that  are  released  to  control  plant-feeding  arthropods.  Quality  control  of  bio- 
logical control  agents  is  a  critical  issue  especially  with  the  mass-production  worldwide  by  many  com- 
panies. This  is  why  the  book,  Qualifr  Control  and  Production  of  Biological  Control  Agents  Thcon- 
and  Testing  Procedures  could  not  be  available  at  a  more  appropriate  time.  This  book  covers  in  detail 
the  many  facets  associated  with  quality  control  of  natural  enemies.  Some  of  the  key  topics  covered 
in  the  book  include:  need  for  quality  control  of  mass-produced  biological  control  agents  (Chapter  1 ), 
the  parasitoids'  need  for  sweets  (Chapter  5),  comparison  of  artificially  vs.  naturally  reared  natural 
enemies  and  their  potential  for  use  in  biological  control  (Chapter  9),  pathogens  of  mass-produced 
natural  enemies  and  pollinators  (Chapter  10),  commercial  availability  of  biological  control  agents 
(Chapter  1 1 ),  mass  production,  storage,  shipment,  and  release  of  natural  enemies  (Chapter  12),  and 
guidelines  for  quality  control  of  commercially  produced  natural  enemies  (Chapter  19). 

The  chapters  discuss  the  specific  subject  matter  interwoven  with  pertinent  references  to  specific 
scientific  publications.  Each  chapter  contains  numerous  references  that  allow  the  reader  to  obtain  fur- 
ther information  if  interested.  In  fact,  I  obtained  copies  of  a  number  of  the  references  that  1  perceived 
as  relevant  for  future  reading.  The  format  of  the  writing,  which  includes  appropriate  sub-headings, 
makes  it  easy  for  the  reader  to  comprehend  the  applicable  information  without  feeling  overwhelmed 
by  the  specific,  detailed  information  or  listing  of  references. 

This  book  is  extremely  well  written  and  edited,  with  only  minor  flaws.  It  is  a  "must"  purchase  for 
practitioners,  educators,  and  researchers  that  are  involved  in  biological  control,  whether  it  be  imple- 
menting programs  or  conducting  applied  or  basic  research  with  biological  control  agents. 


Raymond  A.  Cloyd 
University  of  Illinois 

384  National  Soybean  Research  Laboratory 
1101  West  Peabody  Drive 
Urbana,  IL61801  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  rclovdto  uiuc.edu 


Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


238  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

THE  GENUS  ADELPHA:  ITS  SYSTEMATICS,  BIOLOGY  AND  BIOGEOGRA- 
PHY  (LEPIDOPTERA:  NYMPHALIDAE:  LIMENITIDINI).  K.  R.  Willmott.  2003. 
Scientific  Publishers,  P.O.  Box  15718,  Gainesville,  Florida,  USA,  ppbk,  $65  US. 

To  revise  a  large  nymphalid  butterfly  genus  like  Adelpha  is  a  Herculean  task.  Tens  of  thousands  of  spec- 
imens belonging  to  hundreds  of  named  taxa  are  scattered  in  museum  collections  all  over  the  world. 
Reviewing  the  literature  on  nomenclature,  taxonomy,  immatures,  morphology,  and  distribution  is  an 
immense  undertaking.  I  would  not  have  considered  it  a  feasible  dissertation  project,  but  then  Willmott 
would  have  proved  me  wrong.  I  cannot  adequately  express  my  awe  at  his  accomplishment;  this  book  is  a 
lifetime's  work  completed  in  a  few  years. 

Some  historical  perspective  may  be  helpful.  Adelpha  is  one  of  those  conspicuous,  species-rich,  over- 
whelmingly Neotropical  nymphalid  genera  that  are  frequently  encountered  and  easily  recognized  in  the 
field.  However,  specific  identification  and  relationships  were  traditionally  based  on  wing  pattern  charac- 
ters that  were  often  difficult  to  interpret.  Aiello  (1984)  noticed  that  the  larval  and  pupal  characters  were  at 
odds  with  adult  classification  and  found  an  unpublished  manuscript  in  which  W.T.M.  Forbes  remarked  that 
Adelpha  wing  pattern  characters  were  incongruent  with  those  of  the  genitalia.  Aiello  suggested  that  the 
wing  pattern  characters  were  "deceptive,"  divided  the  genus  preliminarily  into  species  groups  using  char- 
acters of  the  immatures  from  a  limited  number  of  species,  and  presented  data  suggesting  that  Adelpha 
might  not  be  monophyletic. 

Willmott  tackled  these  issues  broadly,  and  the  result  is  a  multi-layered  monograph.  At  one  level,  it  is  a 
beautifully  illustrated  alpha  taxonomy  of  the  209  taxa  (85  species)  that  Willmott  recognizes.  Those  barely 
acquainted  with  Adelpha  will  use  the  450+  superb  color  illustrations  of  adults  to  identify  specimens.  At  a 
second  level,  there  are  illustrated  keys  in  the  appendices  to  guide  the  reader  through  identification  of  those 
species  with  exceedingly  similar  wing  patterns.  At  a  third  level,  the  monograph  is  a  mammoth  reference 
that  draws  together  information  from  the  literature,  from  collection  specimens,  and  from  Willmott's  exten- 
sive field  work.  At  a  fourth  level,  Willmott  has  summarized  and  digested  data  on  distribution  and  habitat. 
If  I  may  oversimplify,  species  richness  is  maximal  at  the  eastern  base  of  the  Andes  and  latititudinal  rich- 
ness depends  upon  whether  any  of  the  major  biogeographical  zones  proposed  years  ago  by  Keith  Brown 
meet  at  that  latitude.  At  a  final  level,  Willmott  discusses  phylogenetic  issues  and  the  evolution  of  larval 
food  plants  and  convergent  wing  patterns,  but  to  gain  a  more  complete  and  up-to-date  picture,  the  serious 
reader  needs  Willmott's  later-completed,  but  earlier-published,  article  (Willmott  2003). 

The  taxonomic  framework  for  Adelpha  is  likely  complete,  although  parts  will  be  polished  as  new  infor- 
mation becomes  available.  In  100  years,  the  information  in  this  book — however  transformed — will  still  be 
used  to  identify  Adelpha.  Quite  an  accomplishment!  It  is  perhaps  fair  to  ask  about  the  impact  of  this  mono- 
graph, given  that  it  is  one  of  the  finest  of  this  genre  to  be  published.  Will  those  with  visions  of  web- 
accessed  biodiversity  databases  find  the  resources  to  transfer  and  maintain  the  reference  information  and 
identification  schemes  from  the  book  to  the  web?  Will  those  who  do  research  on  diversity  and  "mimicry" 
find  and  use  the  wealth  of  data  in  the  monograph?  Will  the  taxonomic  framework  for  Adelpha  spur 
researchers  other  than  Willmott  to  use  Adelpha  as  research  animals?  If  there  is  justice  in  this  world,  the 
answers  in  a  decade  will  be  resoundingly  positive. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Aiello,  A.    1984.  Adelpha  (Nymphalidae):  deception  on  the  wing.  Psyche  91 : 1-45. 

Willmott,  K.  R.  2003.  Cladistic  analysis  of  the  neotropical  butterfly  genus  Adelpha  (Lepidoptera: 
Nymphalidae),  with  comments  on  the  subtribal  classification  of  Limenitidini.  Systematic  Entomology 
28:729-322. 

Robert  K.  Robbins,  Department  of  Entomology,  Smithsonian  Institution 
P.  O.  Box  37012,  NHB  Stop  127,  Washington,  DC  20013-7012  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  Robbins.Robert@nmnh.si.edu 

Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  4.  September  &  October  2003 239 

SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  MARCH  23,  2003' 
The  Ecology  of  Aquatic  Beetles 

Dr.  G.  Winfield  Fairchild 
Department  of  Biology,  West  Chester  University,  West  Chester,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 

Dr.  G.  Winfield  Fairchild  presented  a  wide-ranging  and  stimulating  talk  on 
two  topics  concerning  aquatic  beetles:  the  diversity  and  ecology  of  beetles  inhab- 
iting ponds,  and  the  feeding  ecology  of  Haliplidae  (this  latter  work  directed  by 
his  student  Ann  Faulds).  The  summary  here  covers  his  investigation  of  the  com- 
position and  dispersal  of  the  beetle  communities  inhabiting  temporary  and  per- 
manent ponds  in  Blackbird  State  Forest  in  Delaware.  The  state  forest  has  a  range 
of  water  bodies  in  close  proximity,  including  closed-canopy  vernal  pools,  open- 
canopy  pools  and  permanent  sites.  The  study  carried  out  benthic  sampling  of  the 
ponds  to  note  habitat  selection  by  the  beetles,  and  also  UV  (black)  light  sampling 
to  ascertain  seasonal  dispersal.  In  the  smallest  of  the  temporary  ponds,  species  of 
beetles  were  the  top  predators,  while  in  the  largest,  permanent  ponds,  species  of 
fish  served  that  role. 

Dr.  Fairchild  found  a  diverse  community  of  74  species  of  beetles,  with  Dytis- 
cidae  and  Hydrophilidae  predominant,  but  including  species  of  Noteridae,  Hali- 
plidae and  Gyrinidae.  Twenty-five  species  were  collected  only  at  the  UV  lights, 
and  16  species  were  only  found  in  the  benthic  samples.  Hydrophilidae  dominat- 
ed the  light  trap  samples  relative  to  their  abundance  in  the  ponds,  indicating 
species  of  this  family  are  especially  likely  to  disperse. 

In  other  entomological  notes,  this  was  the  first  meeting  with  Dr.  Susan  Whit- 
ney King  serving  as  President  of  the  Society.  Howard  Boyd  noted  the  first  emer- 
gence of  adult  bees  of  Colletes  thoracicus  on  March  18,  2003,  at  an  aggregation 
nest,  area  near  his  home  in  Tabernacle,  New  Jersey.  He  noted  this  is  exactly  one 
month  later  than  the  first  emergence  in  2002,  indicating  the  severity  of  this  past 
winter  and  early  spring. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Secretary 

of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2003) 

E-mail:  gelhaus(«  acnatsci.org. 


'  The  report  for  the  AES  Society  Meeting  that  took  place  in  of  February  26,  2003,  was  published  in 
Entomological  News  1 13(5),  p.  356  of  "2002,"  mailed  on  April  9,  2003. 


Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


240  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  OCTOBER  22,  2003 

Genetics  of  parthenogenesis  in  two  Centroptilum  mayflies: 

Is  facultative  parthenogenesis  in  mayflies 

a  backup  reproductive  strategy? 

David  H.  Funk 
Stroud  Water  Research  Center,  970  Spencer  Road,  Avondale,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 

Parthenogenesis  and  its  genetic  consequences  in  two  species  of  baetid  may- 
flies (Ephemeroptera:  Baetidae)  was  discussed  in  a  talk  by  David  Funk,  of  the 
Stroud  Water  Research  Center.  Centroptilum  triangulifer  (McDunnough),  an 
obligately  parthenogenetic  mayfly,  was  shown  to  be  clonal,  as  evidenced  by  no 
change  in  multilocus  genotypes  for  25  allozyme  loci  over  27  generations  in  the 
laboratory.  This  also  suggests  the  mechanism  of  parthenogenesis  is  apomictic  or 
a  functionally  equivalent  form  of  automixis,  with  high  (20  percent)  observed  het- 
erozygosity.  Phylogenetic  analysis  of  52  clones  indicates  a  polyphyletic  origin 
for  this  species  that  was  preceded  by  a  transition  to  clonality. 

Centroptilum  alamance  (Traver)  is  facultatively  parthenogenetic,  and  is  the 
sister  species  (most  closest  relative)  of  C.  triangulifer.  C.  alamance  is  primarily 
sexual,  as  indicated  by  a  1:1  sex  ratio  with  no  significant  departures  from  Hardy- 
Weinberg  equilibrium  and  little  or  no  linkage  disequilibrium.  Parthenogenetic 
development  took  significantly  longer  than  for  fertilized  eggs.  Allozyme  data 
show  a  heterozygosity  loss  of  approximately  20%  per  generation,  indicating 
parthenogenesis  in  this  species  is  automictic,  with  crossing  over. 

Although  obligate  parthenogenesis  appears  to  be  rare  in  mayflies,  a  survey  of 
parthenogenetic  egg  hatching  rates  in  normally  sexual  mayflies  indicates  facu- 
latative  parthenogenesis  is  common  and  widespread,  averaging  about  20  percent. 
Mr.  Funk  hypothesized  that:  (i)  a  high  incidence  of  facultative  parthenogenesis, 
which  appears  to  occur  after  the  normal  period  of  fertilization,  may  give  nor- 
mally sexual  females  a  "second  chance"  at  offspring  should  their  eggs  fail  to  be 
fertilized;  and  (ii)  parthenogenetic  progeny  can  subsequently  reenter  the  sexual 
pool. 

In  other  entomological  news  at  the  meeting,  Dr.  Hal  White  noted  his  capture 
of  a  Zebra  Longwing  butterfly  (Heliconius  charitonius)  in  White  Clay  Creek 
State  Park,  Newcastle  County,  Delaware  on  June  29,  2003.  Because  adults  of  this 
species  are  poor  fliers,  and  not  known  much  further  north  than  South  Carolina, 
Dr.  White  supposed  this  adult  came  from  a  possible  release  of  butterflies  at  a 
local  wedding  or  some  other  function.  This  specimen  is  now  in  the  University  of 
Delaware  insect  collection.  About  30  members  and  visitors  were  present  at  the 
meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Sec.  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2003) 

E-mail:  gelhaus(a>acnatsci.org. 


Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  Book  Reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  fonvard- 
ed  for  additional  review  within  30  days.  The  Editor  reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manu- 
script to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcomed  to  list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  arti- 
cle should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  Editors  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  Editor  and  the  Business  Manager,  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  file,  together  with  the  reprint 
order  form  as  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  within  72  hours  and  return  them  to  the  Editor  and 
to  the  Business  Editor  by  air  mail  or  email  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are 
urged  to  provide  forwarding  orders  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not 
approved  within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  Editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send 
them  to  the  printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  $25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  $30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  half-tones  at  the  rate  of  $30.00  each,  regardless  of  size.  These 
charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004  United 
States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts.  There 
are  no  page  charges  for  Book  Reviews.  Page  and  reprints  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn,  to 
whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address  is: 
3789  Foulk  Road.  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

It  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  a  .pdf 
(portable  document  format)  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  Busi- 
ness Manager,  Faith  Kuehn. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-1211;  fax  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)  366-9132.  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600.  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road.  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48106-9866,  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


39088010748788 
SOCIETY  MEETING  OF  NOVEMBER  19,  2003 

Two  Entomological  Perspectives  of  New  Zealand 

Joe  Sheldon,  Department  of  Biology,  Messiah  College,  Grantham,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 
and  Greg  Cowper,  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  U.S.A. 

New  Zealand's  diverse  and  interesting  insect  fauna  was  the  focus  of  the 
Society's  November  meeting  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  Joe  Sheldon 
began  the  evening  presentation  with  an  overview  of  the  geological,  climatological, 
and  cultural  features  that  have  shaped  New  Zealand's  unique  and  amazing  biodi- 
versity. The  human  impact  on  native  species  was  examined  beginning  with  the 
arrival  of  the  Maori  900  to  1000  years  ago  and  followed  by  the  European  colo- 
nization and  attempted  pastoralism  of  the  country  over  the  past  200  years.  The  late 
20th  century  environmental  awakening  in  both  the  Maori  and  European  com- 
munity has  turned  the  eyes  of  New  Zealand  toward  the  preservation  and  restor- 
ation of  its  native  ecological  systems  and  species.  Sheldon  provided  an  overview 
of  the  current  threats  to  biodiversity  and  then  turned  the  remaining  evening  pro- 
gram to  Greg  Cowper. 

Greg  Cowper  presented  "Weta  Conservation  in  New  Zealand:  A  Successful 
Translocation  of  the  Mahoenui  Giant  Weta.  "  He  and  his  son  traveled  to  New 
Zealand  in  February  and  March  2003  to  assist  the  Department  of  Conservation  in 
monitoring  the  results  of  a  weta  translocation  experiment.  The  endangered 
Mahoenui  Giant  Weta  Deinacrida  mahoenui  (Gibbs,  1999)  (Orthoptera:  Anostos- 
tomatidae),  occurs  only  on  a  240  hectare  reserve  in  the  North  Island's  Southern 
King  Country.  Here  the  giant  weta  have  colonized  remnant  farmland  reverting  to 
gorse,  Ulex  europeans,  a  dense,  thorny,  introduced  bush.  In  2000/2001  approx- 
imately 1 70  weta  were  relocated  to  private  land,  and  by  2002,  nymphs  had  been 
observed.  Volunteers  of  the  2003  "Weta  Weekend"  collected,  measured,  sexed  & 
released  22  sub-adult  Mahoenui  Giant  Weta  demonstrating  these  orthopterans  had 
been  bred  on  site  and  underscoring  the  first  successful  translocation  of  these  ani- 
mals. 

The  attendees  of  the  meeting  were  treated  to  displays  of  specimens  of  weta  from 
the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 's  Entomology  Collection.  Dr.  Sigitas  Podenas, 
visiting  from  Lithuania,  and  on  staff  at  the  University  of  Vilnius  and  Amberworld, 
set  up  a  display  of  specimens  in  Baltic  Amber  of  the  newly  described  order  of 
insects  Mantophasmatodea.  Nearly  45  members  and  visitors  were  present  at  the 
meeting. 

Jon  Gelhaus,  Corresponding  Sec.  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  (2003) 

E-mail:  gelhaus@acnatsci.org. 


Mailed  on  August  25,  2004 


USISSN  0013-872X 


NOVEMBER  &  DECEMBER  2003 


No.  5 


NTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


e  of  old  Trypoxylon  politum  nest  by  Chalybion  californicum 
<Hymenoptera:  Sphecidae)  in  New  York,  U.S.A.  Frank  E.  Kurczewski   241 

Preliminary  inventory  of  the  planthoppers  (Hemiptera:  Fulgoroidea) 
of  the  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park,  North  Carolina  and 
Tennessee,  U.S.A.  Charles  R.  Bartlett  and  Jacob  L.  Bowman  246 

Taxonomic  and  ecological  notes  on  Leucotrichia pictipes  (Trichoptera: 
Hydroptilidae),  a  microcaddisfly  newly  recorded  from  Ohio,  U.S.A. 

J.  B.  Keiper  and  R.  J.  Bartolotta    255 

Brevicorynella  (Hemiptera:  Aphididae),  a  newly  recorded  genus  from  China, 
with  the  description  of  a  new  species  and  a  new  record 

Gexia  Qiao,  Liyitn  Jiang,  and  Guangxue  Zhang    260 

Notes  on  Doliclwpus,  Allohercostomus,  and  Phalacrosoma  from  Nepal  (Diptera: 
Dolichopodidae)  Ding  Yang,  Toyohei  Saigusa,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga    271 

A  new  species  of  Nepalomyia  from  Indonesia  (Diptera:  Dolichopodidae) 

Ding  Yang,  Toyohei  Saigusa,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga    275 

Notes  on  the  genus  Chaetogonopteron  from  Guangxi,  China  (Diptera: 

Dolichopodidae)  Lili  Zhang,  Ding  Yang,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga    279 

Narrow  crawl  space  increases  capture  of  cockroaches  (Blattodea) 

in  adhesive  traps  RifS,  El-Mallakh  and  Michael  J.  Hartmann    284 

BOOK  REVIEWS: 

The  passionate  observer.  Writings  from  the  world  of  nature  by 

Jean-Henri  Fabre  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  and  Suzanne  C.  Shaffer    288 

Cricket  Boy:  A  Chinese  tale  retold  by  Feenie  Ziner.  Illustrated  by  Ed  Young. 
Students  of  the  John  F.  Kennedy  Elementary  School,  Houston 
Independent  School  District  Houston,  Texas,  and  Yen  T.  Nguyen  Back  Cover 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTES: 

Confirmation  of  the  Pygmy  Snow fly,  Allocapnia  pygmaea  (Burmeister) 
(Plecoptera:  Capniidae),  from  North  Dakota,  United  States 

B.  C.  Kondratieff  and  R.  W.  Baumann    289 

Myiasis  on  bristle-spined  porcupine,  Chaetomys  subspinosus  (Olfers,  1818), 

in  Bahia,  Brazil  Adriana  Akenii  Kuniy  and  Caroline  Nascimento  Santos    291 


Faith  B.  Kuehn    293 


AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY  BUSINESS: 

Statement  of  ownership,  management,  and  circulation 

Acknowledgments  to  reviewers  of  articles  published  in  Entomological  News 

(Volume  114)  and  to  volunteers  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay    294 

Index  to  Volume  114(1-5)  2003  Suzanne  Mclntire,  Carmen  Montopoli, 

Judith  Ban;  Suzanne  C.  Shaffer,  and  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay    298 


THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY 

MAILED  ON  SEPTEMBER  30,  2004 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS,  THE  AMERICAN  ENTOMOLOGICAL  SOCIETY, 
AND  NEW  GUIDELINES  FOR  AUTHORS  OF  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

Entomological  News  is  published  bimonthly  except  July-August  by  The  American  Entomological 
Society,  which  is  headquartered  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin 
Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195  United  States  of  America.  AES  can  be  reached,  as  follows: 
telephone  (215)  561-3978;  fax  (215)  299-1028;  e-mail,  aes@acnatsci.org  and  website:  http://www. 
acnatsci  .org/hosted/aes . 

Subscriptions  to  and  Back  Issues  of  Entomological  News.  Private  subscriptions  for  personal 
use  of  members  of  the  society  are  US  $15  per  year  prepaid.  Subscriptions  for  institutions,  such  as 
libraries,  laboratories,  etc.  and  nonmembers,  are  US$30  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  in  the  USA 
and  US  $34  per  year  prepaid  for  those  located  outside  the  USA.  Back  issues  when  available  are  sold 
by  complete  volume,  for  US  $15  to  members,  and  US  $30  to  nonmembers.  Membership  /  sub- 
scription application  and  additional  information  is  available  at:  http://www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/ 
subscription.html.  Please  send  inquiries  or  send  completed  membership  form  to:  Office  Manager  at 
the  address  above,  e-mail:  aes@say.acnatsci.org,  or  call  (215)  561-3978. 

Previous  editors  of  Entomological  News:  1890  Eugene  Murray-Aaron  (1852-1940);  1890-1920 
Henry  Skinner  (1861 -1926);  1921-1944  Philip  P.  Calvert  (1871-  1961);  1945-1967  R.G.  Schmieder 
(1898-1967);  1968-1972  Ross  H.Arnett,  Jr.  (1919-1999);  1973-1974  R.W.  Lake;  1974-2002  Howard 
P.  Boyd;  2002-2003  F.  Christian  Thompson  and  Michael  Pogue. 

New  Guidelines  for  authors  of  Entomological  News: 

Further  guidelines  can  be  found  on 
http://\vww.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/instructions.htm 

Subject  Coverage:  Entomology,  sensu  lato.  Manuscripts  on  systematics,  ecology,  evolution, 
morphology,  physiology,  behavior,  biodiversity,  conservation,  paleobiology,  and  other  aspects  of 
insect  and  terrestrial  arthropod  life  as  well  as  nomenclature,  biographies  and  history  of  entomology, 
among  others,  are  appropriate  topics  for  papers  submitted  to  Entomological  News.  Papers  on  applied, 
economic,  and  regulatory  entomology  or  on  toxicology  and  related  subjects  will  be  considered  only 
if  they  also  make  a  major  contribution  in  one  of  the  aforementioned  fields. 

Any  author  may  submit  papers.  Manuscripts  will  be  accepted  from  any  author,  although, 
papers  from  members  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  are  given  priority.  It  is  suggested  that 
all  prospective  authors  join  the  AES. 

Send  manuscripts,  books  for  review,  and  editorial  correspondence  to  the  editor.  All  manu- 
scripts, including  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews,  submitted  for  publication  in  Entomological  News 
as  well  as  all  associated  editorial  communications  must  be  sent  to  the  Editor,  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay 
at  this  address:  Department  of  Paleobiology,  MRC- 121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  P.  O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  D.C.  20013-7012  U.S.A.  If  an  author  uses  a  mail- 
ing service  that  does  not  accept  addresses  with  a  P.  O.  Box,  please  use  this  address:  Department  of 
Paleobiology,  MRC- 121.  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Institution,  West  Load- 
ing Dock,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20560  U.S.A.  Other  means  of  contacting  the  Editor  are, 
as  follows:  Phone:  (202)  633-1383.  Fax:  (202)  786-2832,  e-mails:  santiago-blay@nmnh.si.edu,  or 
blayj@hotmail.com,  or  via  the  webpage  at  http://www.geocities.com/entomologicalnews/contact. 
htm.  Books  for  review  should  also  be  sent  to  the  editor  who  will,  in  turn,  give  them  to  a  colleague 
for  review. 

Agreement.  By  submitting  a  paper  for  publication,  authors  tacitly  agree  to  not  submit  in  parallel 
the  same  manuscript  to  another  journal.  For  published  papers,  authors  agree  to  accept  responsibility 
for  all  page,  illustration,  and  requested  reprint  charges.  Rejected  manuscripts  will  be  discarded,  ex- 
cept for  original  artwork  and  photographs,  which  will  be  returned  to  the  authors. 

Scientific  Notes  and  Book  Reviews.  These  are  much  shorter  contributions,  typically  not  exceed- 
ing two  printed  pages.  The  main  difference  between  these  types  of  contributions  and  longer  papers  is 
that  scientific  notes  and  book  reviews  lack  an  abstract  and  most  of  the  main  headings,  except  for  the 
acknowledgments  and  the  literature  cited  sections. 

Postmaster:  If  undeliverable,  please  send  to 

The  American  Entomological  Society  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway  /  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

THIRD  CLASS  POSTAGE  PAID  AT  DOVER,  DELAWARE  19901  U.S.A. 


_  Vol.  1  14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  _  241 

REUSE  OF  OLD  TRYPOXYLON  POLITUM  NEST 

BY  CHALYBION  CALIF  ORNICUM 
(HYMENOPTERA:  SPHECIDAE)  IN  NEW  YORK,  U.S.A.1 

Frank  E.  Kurczewskr 

ABSTRACT:  The  re-use  of  an  old  Tiypoxylon  politum  mud  pipe  organ  nest  by  a  female  Clmlyhinn 
californicum  is  described  and  illustrated.  The  female  C.  californicum  cleaned,  renovated,  and  stocked 
with  paralyzed  spiders  19  of  the  abandoned  25  T.  politum  cells.  Some  C.  californicum  behavioral 
components  are  delineated. 

KEYWORDS:  Re-use  of  nests,  Trypoxylon,  Chalybion,  Hymenoptera,  Sphecidae. 

Species  of  Chalybion  build  mud  nests  in  preexisting  cavities  and  crevices  and 
renovate  the  abandoned  mud  nests  of  other  species  of  wasps  (Bohart  and  Menke 
1976).  Females  carry  water  to  a  nearby  earthen  source  and  mold  mud  to  partition 
and  seal  these  nests  (Rau  1928,  Ward  1971).  Species  of  Chalybion  renovate  and 
stock  with  paralyzed  spiders  the  abandoned  mud  nests  of  Sceliphron  and  Tty  poxy- 
Ion  (Bohart  and  Menke  1976).  Old  nests  of  the  yellow  and  black  mud  dauber, 
Sceliphron  caementarium  (Drury),  are  sometimes  reused  for  nesting  by  the  blue 
mud  dauber,  Chalybion  californicum  (Saussure)  (Rau  1928).  The  re-use  of  an 
abandoned  mud  pipe  organ  nest  of  Trypoxylon  politum  Say  by  a  female  C.  cali- 
fornicum is  unusual,  has  not  been  previously  documented,  and  is  detailed  below. 

RESULTS 

An  old  T.  politum  nest  located  on  the  outskirts  of  Syracuse  (Onondaga  County, 
New  York,  U.S.A.)  had  seven  pipes  affixed  near  the  top  of  a  vertical  cedar  siding 
board  underneath  a  70  cm-wide  roof  overhang  (Fig.  1  ).  The  seven  pipes  were  built 
consecutively  from  left  to  right  by  one  female  in  July  1999.  The  three  shortest 
pipes  on  the  right  side  of  the  nest  were  the  last  three  built  by  the  aging  wasp.  The 
individual  pipes  were  11-13  mm  wide  and  89-124  mm  long.  Twenty-five  exit 
holes  of  wasps  that  emerged  the  following  year  [2000]  were  spaced  16-20  mm 
apart  along  the  seven  pipes.  The  number  of  holes  per  pipe  [3-4]  varied  with  pipe 
length.  Thirteen  of  the  holes  were  6  mm  in  diameter  and  probably  resulted  from 
female  emergence.  Twelve  of  the  holes  were  either  4  or  5  mm  wide  and  may  have 
been  made  by  emerging  males,  assuming  they  were  smaller  than  the  females. 

The  female  C.  californicum  was  first  observed  on  the  old  T.  politum  nest  on 
July  12,  2002.  Through  July  26  she  renovated,  provisioned,  and  closed  13  cells 


1  Received  on  October  9,  2002.  Accepted  on  Mav  2,  2004. 

:  Environmental   and   Forest   Biology,   State   University 
Forestry,  Syracuse,  New  York  13210-2778.  Mailing  Addre 
1  32  1  5  U.S.A. 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  114(5):  121,  November  &  December  2003 
Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


242 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  1 .  Old  nest  of  Trypoxylon  politum  about  midway  through 
nesting  sequence  of  Chalybion  calif ornicum.  Female  C.  calif br- 
nicum  is  resting  head  downward  near  top  of  second  pipe  from  left. 
Three  pipes  to  right  have  been  provisioned  and  sealed  with  mud. 


during  mainly  sunny,  unusually  warm  [air  temperature  in  shade,  24.4-36. 7°C]  dry 
weather.  Her  earliest  and  latest  hours  working  at  the  nest  were  0946  and  1945 
(EOT),  respectively.  She  was  seen  bringing  prey  to  the  nest  as  early  as  1006  h 
(EOT)  at  an  air  temperature  [shade]  of  26.7°C.  She  did  not  work  at  the  nest  on  one 
rainy  day  or  on  a  cool  [16.7-22.8°C]  but  dry  day.  She  worked  intermittently  at  the 
nest  from  July  26  to  August  5  between  sporadic  periods  of  rainfall  renovating, 
stocking  with  prey,  and  closing  with  mud  six  additional  cells/emergence  holes. 
Her  daily  routine  consisted  of  ( 1 )  searching  for  and  finding  an  unoccupied  T. 
politum  emergence  hole/cell,  (2)  working  in  the  emergence  hole  and  cell  remov- 
ing old  cell  contents,  (3)  walking  around  the  emergence  hole  and  on  the  nest  sur- 
face before  taking  flight,  (4)  returning  in  flight  with  a  small  paralyzed  spider,  (5) 
placing  the  spider  in  the  cell,  repositioning  it  with  the  mandibles  and,  later,  tight- 
ly packing  in  other  spiders  using  the  front  of  the  head,  (6)  ovipositing  on  one  spi- 
der outside  the  cell  and  then  placing  it  inside,  (7)  cleaning  the  antennae  and 
mandibles  with  the  forelegs  before  taking  flight,  and  (8)  bringing  mud  pellets 
from  the  other  side  of  the  nest,  after  depositing  water  on  the  old  mud,  and  plas- 
tering the  hole  shut. 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


243 


Figure  2.  Diagram  of  old  nest  of  Trypoxylon  politum  showing  chro- 
nological order  in  which  19  of  25  cells  were  provisioned  (stocked 
with  prey)  and  closed  by  female  C.  californicum.  Open  circles  desig- 
nate cells  that  were  not  provisioned. 


The  female  C.  californicum  spent  58-132  minutes  [mean  =  84.3  ±  32.97  stan- 
dard deviations  of  the  mean,  n  =  8]  searching  for  and  renovating  an  unoccupied 
T.  politum  cell  prior  to  introducing  prey.  The  wasp  utilized  2-24  [mean  =  13.6  ± 
7.62,  n  =  12],  3-23  [mean  =  12.3  ±7.11,  n=  8],  4-36  [mean  =  17.4  ±  9.84,  n  = 
11],  3-35  [mean  =  10.6  ±  9.60,  n  =  12]  and  3-47  minutes  [mean  =  20.8  ±  12.26, 
n  =  12]  between  consecutive  returns  with  prey  for  cells  15-19,  respectively.  She 
used  3-4 1  minutes  [mean  =  2 1 .4  ±  1 1 .23,  n=  1 4]  between  returns  to  the  nest  with- 
out prey.  She  spent  from  10  seconds  to  1-2  minutes  walking  around  the  emer- 


244  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


gence  hole  and  on  the  nest  exterior  after  placing  a  spider  in  the  cell  and  before 
taking  flight.  She  expended  36-68  minutes  [mean  =  55.0  ±  14.41,  n  =  9]  to  plas- 
ter shut  an  old  T.  politum  emergence  hole.  She  used  11-41  minutes  [mean  =  21.9 
±  13.33,  n  =  5]  to  temporarily  plug  an  emergence  hole  in  order  to  finish  the  cell 
the  next  morning. 

The  wasp  stocked  with  spiders  and  plastered  over  the  three  pipes  to  the  right 
beginning  always  with  the  uppermost  holes/cells,  as  numbered  in  order  of  com- 
pletion (Fig.  2),  before  moving  to  the  other  pipes.  She  then  worked  on  the  upper 
holes/cells  of  the  remaining  four  pipes  moving  mainly  from  right  to  left.  The 
cells  that  were  renovated,  provisioned,  and  closed  first  were  usually  most  pro- 
tected by  the  roof  overhang. 

Re-stinging  a  spider  was  observed  several  times  on  the  nest  exterior.  Once,  re- 
stinging  preceded  oviposition.  Oviposition  was  seen  five  times  on  the  nest  exte- 
rior beside  an  old  emergence  hole.  Prior  to  ovipositing  on  the  spider,  the  wasp 
bent  her  abdomen  in  the  shape  of  a  letter  C  and  rocked  it  slowly  forward  and 
backward.  Keeping  the  abdomen  bent,  she  placed  the  tip  against  the  convex  sur- 
face of  the  base  of  the  spider's  abdomen  and  affixed  a  whitish,  sausage-shaped 
egg.  She  deposited  eggs  on  the  2nd,  3rd,  4th,  5th,  and  6th  prey  brought  for  cells 
that,  when  completed,  contained  12,  12,  8,  12,  and  11  spiders,  respectively. 

Six  fully  provisioned  cells  (nos.  14-19)  held  8-12  (mean  =:  11.0  ±  1.73)  spi- 
ders. Most  of  the  spiders  brought  to  the  nest  were  about  the  size  of  the  wasp's 
thorax,  some  smaller,  and  a  few  larger.  Once,  the  female  flew  in  with  a  relative- 
ly large  immature  Neoscona  arabesca  (Walckenaer)  weighing  38  mg.  This  prey 
was  too  large  to  fit  into  the  opening,  was  carried  away  by  the  wasp,  and  released 
on  the  ground.  One  small  Theridion  frondeum  Hentz  was  accidentally  dropped 
outside  as  the  wasp  was  attempting  to  place  it  in  a  cell.  The  spider  discharged  silk 
from  its  spinnerets  as  it  fell  downward.  The  female  flew  rapidly  downward, 
caught  the  spider  in  midair,  flew  back  to  the  opening,  landed,  and  placed  it  in  the 
cell. 

A  sample  of  prey  spiders  recovered  from  four  cells  consisted  of  male  and 
female  Theridiidae  [Steatoda  borealis  (Hentz),  8;  Theridion  tepidariorum  (C.  L. 
Koch),  8;  T.  frondeum,  23]  and  immature  Araneidae  [Neoscona  arabesca,  3;Ara- 
neus  diadematus  Clerck,  1]. 

DISCUSSION 

Prior  studies  link  C.  californicum  with  reusing  old  nests  of  the  yellow  and 
black  mud  dauber,  Sceliphron  caementarium  (Rau  1928).  Chalybion  califor- 
nicum has  not  been  noted  reusing  old  mud  nests  of  the  pipe  organ  wasp,  Tnpo.\v- 
lon  politum.  However,  other  Chalybion  species  are  known  to  reuse  abandoned 
nests  of  other  Tiypoxylon  species  (Bohart  and  Menke  1976). 

There  is  disagreement  as  to  where  and  when  the  egg  of  C.  californicum  is  laid 
(Bohart  and  Menke  1976).  Yamamoto  (1942)  observed  that  the  egg  of  C.  japon- 
icum  (Gribodo)  was  affixed  to  the  spider's  abdomen  before  the  prey  was  placed 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 245 

in  the  cell,  as  I  noted  for  C.  californicum.  Rau  (1928)  may  have  unknowingly 
witnessed  oviposition  on  a  prey  of  C  californicum  outside  the  cell,  but  he  report- 
ed the  behavior  as  stinging.  He  described  a  wasp  curling  its  abdomen  underneath 
that  of  the  first  spider  brought  to  the  nest  and  inserting  the  sting  for  15  seconds. 
All  of  the  stings  I  observed  administered  to  C.  californicum  prey  were  in  the  un- 
derside of  the  prey's  cephalothorax,  not  in  the  abdomen. 

Rau  (1928),  as  reported  by  Bohart  and  Menke  (1976),  believed  that  the  egg  of 
C.  californicum  is  laid  on  the  last  spider  brought  to  the  cell.  Muma  and  Jeffers 
(1945)  noted  that  the  egg  of  this  species  is  placed  on  the  first  prey  for  the  cell, 
but  they  indicated  that  this  might  not  always  be  the  case.  I  found  that  the  egg  of 
C.  californicum  was  laid  on  a  spider  early  in  the  provisioning  sequence,  usually 
before  half  the  spiders  were  introduced  to  the  cell.  Yamamoto  (1958)  found  sim- 
ilarly in  C.  japonicum  that  the  egg  was  usually  laid  on  a  spider  before  half  the 
prey  had  been  placed  in  the  cell. 

In  previous  studies  on  C.  californicum  the  predominant  prey  family  was  Ther- 
idiidae  (Rau  1935;  Irving  and  Hinman  1945;  Muma  and  Jeffers  1945),  as  I  found 
in  my  study.  Common  use  of  the  black  widow  spider,  Latrodectus  mactans  (Fab- 
ricius),  a  theridiid,  was  noted  in  these  reports. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Bonnie  Brierton  identified  the  species  of  prey  Theridiidae.  Tsutomu  Nakatsugawa  translated 
Yamamoto 's  (1958)  paper  from  Japanese  to  English. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bohart,  R.  M.  and  A.  S.  Menke.   1976.  Sphecid  Wasps  of  the  World.  A  Generic  Revision. 
University  of  California  Press.  Berkeley.  California,  U.S.A.  695  pp. 

Irving,  W.  G.  and  E.  H.  Hinman.   1935.  The  blue  mud-dauber  as  a  predator  of  the  black  widow 

spider.  Science  82:395-396. 

Muma,  M.  II.  and  VV.  F.  Jeffers.   1945.  Studies  of  the  spider  prey  of  several  mud-dauber  wasps. 
Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  38:245-255. 

Rau,  P.    1928.  The  nesting  habits  of  the  wasp,  Chalybion  cucruleiim.  Annals  of  the  Entomological 
Society  of  America  21:25-35. 

Rau,  P.   1935.  The  wasp,  Clmlybion  cyiincum  Fab.,  preys  upon  the  black  widow  spider,  Latrodectus 
mactans  Fab.  Entomological  News  46:259-260. 

Ward,  G.    1971.  Nest  site  preference  of  Chalybion  limmernmnni  Dahlbom.  Proceedings  of  the  In- 
diana Academy  of  Sciences  80:264-266. 

Yamamoto,  D.    1942.   Habits  of  Sccliphron  /Chalybion)  inflexum  Sickmann.  Kontyu  16:69-75. 

Yamamoto,  D.    1958.   Habits  of  Cluilybion  inflexum  Sickmann.  II.  Bulletin  of  the  Faculty  of  Agri- 
culture, Meiji  University  7:63-72. 


246  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


PRELIMINARY  INVENTORY  OF  THE  PLANTHOPPERS 

(HEMIPTERA:  FULGOROIDEA)  OF  THE 

GREAT  SMOKY  MOUNTAINS  NATIONAL  PARK, 

NORTH  CAROLINA  AND  TENNESSEE,  U.S.A.1 

Charles  R.  Bartlett2  and  Jacob  L.  Bowman1 

ABSTRACT:  The  Fulgoroidea  of  the  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park  was  investigated  in 
July  2002  as  part  of  an  ongoing  all-taxa  biotic  inventory.  Sweep  samples  were  taken  by  three  inves- 
tigators from  28  localities  throughout  the  Park  with  all  specimens  of  the  target  taxon  retained.  This 
preliminary  inventory  obtained  1,290  specimens,  representing  8  families,  23  genera  and  37  species. 
Species  accumulation  curves  and  nine  estimators  of  species  richness  were  explored,  all  of  which  pre- 
dicted a  species  richness  of  approximately  50  species  (range  of  estimates  44-58  species).  This  ap- 
proximation probably  underestimates  the  true  species  richness  of  planthoppers  because  of  seasonal, 
spatial  and  methodological  limitations  of  this  initial  estimate. 

KEY  WORDS:  Auchenorrhyncha,  Fulgoromorpha,  All  Taxa  Biodiversity  Inventory  (ATBI),  species 
richness  estimation. 

In  late  1997,  an  all-taxon  biodiversity  inventory  (ATBI)  was  initiated  in  the 
Great  Smoky  Mountain  National  Park  (GSMNP)  (Sharkey  2001 ).  This  study  rep- 
resents the  first  effort  to  inventory  the  Fulgoroidea  (planthoppers)  of  the 
GSMNP.  Brimley  (1938)  and  Wray  (1967)  provide  a  list  of  insect  species  for 
North  Carolina,  but  there  does  not  appear  to  be  a  similar  publication  for  Tennes- 
see. Published  species  records  for  the  Park  appear  to  be  limited  to  two  species: 
Haplaxius  pictifrons  (Cixiidae)  and  Bruchomorpha  minima  (Issidae)  (Wray 
1967,  see  Holzinger  et  al.  2002  for  recent  generic  nomenclature  for  cixiids).  Un- 
published Park  records  include  5  species:  Acanalonia  bivittata  (Acanaloniidae), 
Bruchomorpha  oculata  (Issidae),  Anormenis  chloris  (as  septemtrionalis,  Flati- 
dae),  Scolops  perdix  (Dictyopharidae),  and  Liburniella  ornata  (Delphacidae). 
The  objectives  of  the  study  were  to  produce  a  preliminary  inventory  of  the  ful- 
goroid  species  and  to  estimate  richness  through  a  species  accumulation  curve  and 
a  series  of  sample-based  richness  estimators. 

METHODS 

Three  investigators  conducted  sweep  samples  at  28  widely  dispersed  locations 
(Figure  1)  in  the  GSMNP  during  July  8-12,  2002.  The  samples  were  generally 
taken  in  readily  accessible  portions  of  the  Park,  and  were  loosely  stratified  by 
elevation  and  general  region  of  the  Park.  The  length  of  time  spent  at  individual 
sample  locations  was  not  uniform,  but  it  was  recorded  as  a  measure  of  sampling 


'  Received  on  March  3,  2004.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

2  Department  of  Entomology  and  Wildlife  Ecology,  250  Townsend  Hall,  University  of  Delaware, 
Newark,  Delaware  19717-1303  U.S.A.  E-mail:  02542(^udel.edu.  Corresponding  author. 

'Department  of  Entomology  and  Wildlife  Ecology,  University  of  Delaware,  250  Townsend  Hall, 
Newark,  Delaware  19717-1303  U.S.A.  E-mail:  jbowman(«>udel.edu. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 247 

"effort."  All  specimens  of  target  taxa  were  aspirated  and  retained  from  the  sam- 
ples in  the  field.  Specimens  were  layered  and  stored  dry  in  a  freezer  until  they 
could  be  processed. 


Figure  1.  Map  of  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park  with  sample  locations:  1)  Cades 
Cove  House  in  Cades  Cove  campground;  2)  Cades  Cove  loop  road,  north  side,  woods; 
3)  Cades  Cove  loop  road,  north  side,  field;  4)  Cades  Cove  loop  road,  Cooper  Road  and  Wet 
Bottom  Trail;  5)  Cades  Cove,  Forge  Creek  Road,  north  end  roadside,  wet  meadow; 
6)  Cades  Cove,  Forge  Creek  Road,  roadside,  woods;  7)  Cades  Cove,  Forge  Creek  Road, 
Henry  Whitehead  cabin,  lawn  and  adjacent  herbs;  8)  Cades  Cove,  Forge  Creek  Road,  wet 
meadow;  9)  Laurel  Creek  Road,  at  underpass,  roadside;  10)  Andrew's  Bald,  North  Side; 
11)  Andrew's  Bald,  South  Side;  12)  Forney  Ridge  Trail,  south  of  Andrew's  Bald; 
13)  Forney  Ridge  Trail,  north  of  Andrew's  Bald;  14)  Clingman's  Dome  Road  pullout,  near 
Noland's  Divide  Trail,  roadside;  15)  Clingman's  Dome  Road  pullout  past  Noland's  Divide 
Trail,  roadside;  16)  Laurel  Creek  Road,  Crib  Gap  Trail;  17)  Forge  Creek  Road,  Wet 
Meadow;  18)  Parson  Branch  Road,  woods,  roadside;  19)  Laurel  Creek  Road  near  jet.  Rt 
73;  20)  Road  to  GSM  institute  at  Tremont  at  bridge  over  Middle  Prong,  Little  River,  road- 
side; 21 )  GSM  Institute  at  Tremont,  fields;  22)  Middle  Prong  Trailhead,  woods  understory; 
23)  Gregory  Ridge  Trail  ca.  2  mi  from  Gregory  Bald,  woods;  24)  Gregory  Bald;  25)  Hyatt 
Ridge  Trail  ca.  1 .5  mi  from  Straight  Fork  Road,  woods  understory;  26)  Straight  Fork  Road 
at  Hyatt  Ridge  Trail  trailhead,  woods  understory  at  roadside;  27)  Horse  Camp  on  Straight 
Fork  Road,  grass  and  woods  understory;  28)  Mingo's  creek  trail,  trailside 

All  adult  fulgoroids  were  identified  and  counted  to  produce  a  species-by-sam- 
ple  abundance  matrix.  A  species  accumulation  curve  (e.g.  Colwell  and  Codding- 
ton  1994,  Hayek  and  Buzas  1996)  and  estimates  of  species  richness  were  creat- 
ed using  the  Estimates  (v6.0bl)  software  program  using  50  randomizations 
(Colwell  1997).  A  series  of  estimators  of  species  richness  are  presented  because 
there  has  yet  to  be  a  clear  indication  of  which  estimator  is  statistically  and  empir- 
ically superior.  The  reported  species  richness  estimates  (and  standard  deviations 
as  appropriate)  are  as  follows:  Abundance-based  Coverage  Estimator  (ACE) 
(Chao  et  al.  1993,  Chazdon  et  al.  1998),  Incidence-based  Coverage  Estimator 
(ICE)  (Lee  and  Chao  1994,  Chazdon  et  al.  1998),  Chao  1  richness  estimator 
(Chao  1)  (Chao  1984,  1987),  Chao  2  richness  estimator  (Chao  2)  (Chao  1987), 
First  and  Second  order  Jackknife  Richness  estimators  (Jack  1,  Jack  2)  (Burnham 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Table  1 .  Species  found  at  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park.  Numbers  in 
bold  indicate  not  previously  receded  in  state  [North  Carolina  (NC)  and  Ten- 
nessee (TN)];  Italics  indicate  recorded  from  state,  but  not  found  in  study. 

Specimens  by  state 
Species Total  No.  Specimens         No.  Sites NC TN 

Acanaloniidae 

Acanalonia  bivirtata  21                       6  0                 21 

Achilidae 

Synecdoche  grisea  11  1                   0 

Synecdoche  impunctala  21  02 

Cixiidae 

Haplaxius  pictifrons  10                     6  1                  9 

Melanolianis  chitliolus  14  2                 12 

Melanoliarus  sp.  (female)  11  01 

Pimalia  vibex  21  02 

Delphacidae 

Delphacodes  andromeda  20                       5  14                   6 

Delphacodes  bifurca  2  21 

Delphacodes  campestris  18                      3  11 

Delphacodes  laminalis  13                      6  3                 10 

Delphacodes  litlu/enta  32  21 

Delphacodes  nitens  25                     4  0                25 

Delphacodes  perusta  11  01 

Delphacodes  puella  222                    18  123                99 

Delphacodes  sagae  11  10 

Isodelphax  basivina  85                    15  60                25 

Kelisia  citn-ata  19  0                 19 

Liburniella  ornata  379                    25  232               147 

Xothodelphax  lineatipes  112                      1  0              112 

Pareuidella  spatulata  52  05 

Pissonotus  aphidioides  11  10 

Pissonotits  bntnneus  14                       6  13                    1 

PissoHotus  gurrarus  11  01 

Pissoiiotus  marginalus  11  01 

Ribautodelphax  sp.  (female)  127                      2  127                   0 

Saccharosydne  saccharivora  11  10 

Stenocranus  lautus  40  1                 39 

Stenocranus  pallidus  42  04 

Toya  propinqua  42  1 

Derbidae 

Anotia  wesftvoodi  24                      2  0                 24 

Cedusa  obscura  93  0                93 


Dictyopharidae 

Scolops  perdix 

2 

1 

0 

2 

Flatidae 

Anonnenis  chloris 

1 

1 

0 

1 

MetailHi  pruinosa 

4 

4 

1 

3 

Onnenoides  veinista 

9 

1 

0 

9 

Issidae 

Bntchomorpha  oculata 

•7 

4 

o 

7 

Total  Specimens 


:290 


599 


691 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 249 

and  Overton  1978,  1979;  Smith  and  van  Bell  1984,  Heltshe  and  Forrester  1983. 
Palmer  1991),  Bootstrap  richness  estimator  (Bootstrap)  (Smith  and  van  Belle 
1984),  and  Michaelis-Menton  richness  estimators  averaged  over  randomizations 
(MMRuns)  and  computed  for  mean  species  accumulation  curve  (MMMean) 
(Raaij  makers  1987). 

All  target  specimens  were  mounted,  labeled  and  placed  in  the  University  of 
Delaware  Insect  Reference  Collection  (UDCC)  in  Newark.  DE,  with  a  synoptic 
collection  deposited  in  the  Museum  Collection  of  the  Great  Smoky  Mountains 
National  Park  (GSNP)  in  Gatlinburg,  TN.  Collection  acronyms  follow  Arnett  and 
colleagues  (1993). 


RESULTS 

A  total  of  1,290  planthopper  specimens  representing  8  families,  23  genera  and 
37  species  were  obtained  (Tables  1  and  2).  By  comparison,  there  are  10  families. 
56  genera  and  162  species  of  planthoppers  previously  recorded  from  North 
Carolina  (viz.  Brimley  1938.  Wray  1967,  Wilson  and  McPherson  1980,  Kramer 
1981,  1983;  Wilson  1982,  Bartlett  and  Deitz  2000).  There  were  25  new  state 
records  (Table  1):  5  for  NC  and  20  for  TN.  Eight  taxa  had  not  been  previously 
recorded  from  either  state,  3 1  had  not  previously  been  reported  from  the  Park. 

The  species  accumulation  curve  (Figure  2)  appears  to  have  approximately 
reached  its  asymptote.  The  estimators  of  species  richness  generally  predicted  a 
richness  of  approximately  50  species,  with  a  range  between  44  (Bootstrap)  to  58 
(Jack2)  species  (Table  3,  Figure  2). 


Table  2.  Comparison  of  numbers  of  taxa  recorded  from  North  Carolina  and 
found  in  the  present  study.  Sources:  Brimley  (1938),  Wray  (1967).  Wilson  and 
McPherson  (1980),  Kramer  (1981.  1983),  Wilson  (1982),  O'Brien  (1985),  and 

Bartlett  and  Deitz  (2000). 


Taxa  recorded  from  NC" 

Taxa  found  in  GSMNP 

Family 

Genera 

Species 

Genera 

Species 

Delphacidae 

20 

61 

11 

23 

Cixiidae 

8 

23 

3 

4 

Derbidae 

10 

28 

2 

2 

Dictyopharidae 

-> 

11 

1 

1 

Achilidae 

3 

14 

1 

2 

Issidae 

2 

11 

1 

1 

Flatidae 

5 

5 

3 

•> 

Acanaloniidae 

1 

4 

1 

1 

Fulgoridae 

3 

4 

0 

0 

Tropiduchidae 

1 

1 

o 

o 

Total  56  162 


250 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  XEll'S 


Table  3.  Estimates  of  planthopper  species  richness  in  GSMNP.  with  standard 
deviation  as  appropriate.  See  methods  for  acronyms  and  references. 


Estimator 


Result  (±  SD) 


ACE 
ICE 

Chaol 

Chao2 

Jackl 

Jack2 

Bootstrap 

MMRuns 

MMMean 


47.61  (±  1.99) 

49.99  (±0.02) 

49.57  (±  12.46) 

51.07  (±9.90) 

51.50  (±4.05) 

58.24  (±3.59) 
44.08 
51.58 
48.78 


in 

gj 


o 
ffi 

1 

c 

<D 


13 

E 
D 
O 


B      60 


o>       50 

o 

0> 
Q. 

40  H 

15 

|       30 

20 

^> 

'm 
I 
O 


10 
0 


Sobs 
Jackl 
Jack2 
Bootstrap 


0  10  20  30 

Number  of  Samples  Pooled 


0  10  20  30 

Number  of  Samples  Pooled 


D 


160 


u] 
c 


0) 


13 
3 

O 


140 


120 
100 


0  10  20  30 

Number  of  Samples  Pooled 


0  10  20 

Number  of  Samples  Pooled 


30 


Figure  2.  Species  accumulation  curves  and  estimated  species  richness  based  on  9  estima- 
tors. (A)  Species  observed  (Sobs)  with  standard  deviation  and  Abundance-based  (ACE) 
and  Incidence-based  (ICE)  Coverage  Estimator  of  species  richness.  (B)  Species  observed, 
first  and  second  order  Jacknife  Richness  estimators  (Jackl,  Jack2).  and  Bootstrap  richness 
estimator  (Bootstrap).  (C)  Species  observed,  Chao  1  and  Chao  2  richness  estimators 
(Chao.  Chao2),  (D)  Species  observed,  Michaelis-Menton  richness  estimators  averaged 
over  randomizations  (MMRuns)  and  computed  for  mean  species  accumulation  curve 
(MMMean). 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


251 


Among  the  species  collected,  the  most  abundant  6  species  (Liburniella  ornata, 
Delphacodes  puella,  Ribautodelphax  sp.,  Nothodelphax  lineatipes,  Isodelphax 
basivitta  [all  Delphacidae],  and  Cedusa  obscura  [Derbidae]),  or  16%  of  the 
species  collected,  represented  79  percent  of  the  individuals  collected  (Figure  3). 
Conversely,  there  were  9  species  (29  percent)  represented  only  by  a  single  spec- 
imen. This  result  is  similar  to  that  obtained  by  Wilson  and  colleagues  (1993)  at 
the  Paintbrush  Prairie,  Missouri,  who  found  the  top  8  common  species  ( 1 7  per- 
cent) representing  79  percent  of  the  total  specimens  collected  (n=l,676),  and  10 
species  represented  by  a  single  specimen  each. 

Two  of  the  6  most  abundant  species  were  collected  in  very  few  locations; 
Nothodelphax  lineatipes  was  collected  only  at  Gregory  Bald,  and  the  Ribautodel- 
phax species  was  collected  only  at  two  sites  on  Clingman's  Dome  Road.  A 
patchy  distribution  of  species  was  expected  given  that  many  species  are  thought 
to  have  limited  host  ranges  (Wilson  1992,  Wilson  et  al.  1994).  The  top  two  most 
abundant  species,  however,  were  also  widely  distributed  in  the  Park,  with  Li- 
burniella ornata  found  at  25  of  28  sample  sites,  and  Delphacodes  puella  found 
at  1 8  sites  (Table  1 ).  The  Ribautodelphax  species  represents  an  unusual  record  in 
part  because  this  genus  (as  currently  understood)  has  not  before  been  reported  in 
the  eastern  United  States  south  of  Michigan  (Ribautodelphax pusilla  Emeljanov, 
by  Wilson  1992),  but  also  because  all  127  specimens  collected  were  females, 
thus  its  specific  identity  could  not  be  determined. 


400  -,  

350  - 

w    30°  " 

c 

0) 

.1     250  : 

o 

Q. 

™     200 

0 

.a     150  1 

| 

Z     100  ] 

1  1 

Illli  III 

•  II 

Q     4-""           '            '           -m      ™   -   •  -  •-  ^-^—  ^--•T^'-^ 

ll&lilllilifll 

ia.xfi|I«|||§|| 

ififiiiliiill 

PI     e     ••     K     u    V     jEl     *S     e    W      3      c 

^EScoxre5o.D£i—     ^m 

IlillSiill 

ilf*lalllli*il 

2m     y>     o     ^-^So.'S^     Q.-S 
•°y>     **   «   3    w    •     o-wu)     E^ 

a*S    S  •§  $•  g    1  •§  £ 

B    Q     D    J    i       SX(n^'P<1)~.- 

b  S  g  i   S2i?o   *S«:i   at  ^ 

1  |  1  1  I  i  2   g-sSS^"- 

fi^a    '§   =    §"2^ 

a|lf  Sf  Hill     11 

oifp         ">5Jo<<" 

S                                               3-           S-    S 

•7                                                                       0)0) 

^ 

IMljir1!}! 

^ 

^g^liggigg 

C                _Q.     (1)      O       tf      O     ^     ^ 

>*                   O3       O        ^       Q-        CQ        >s 

(/)              Q             .Sfl              .SO     (/) 

i 

Taxon  $ 

Figure  3.  Frequency  distribution  for  each  planthopper  species  collected  at  the  GSMNP. 
Number  of  individuals  provided  in  Table  1 . 


E\TOMOLOGICAL  XEH'S 


D1SCISSION 

The  estimators  of  species  richness  indicate  that  the  true  species  richness,  based 
on  the  samples  presented  here,  should  be  approximately  50.  This  estimate.  ho\\e\  - 
er.  is  limited  by  the  methods  used  (only  sweeping),  season,  and  geographic  distri- 
bution of  the  samples.  It  was  necessan.  however,  to  use  a  single  sampling  method 

:ieet  the  species  richness  estimator's  assumption  of  sample  homogeneity.  Early 
July  was  chosen  for  this  study  because  it  is  a  period  of  time  when  planthopper  rich- 
ness and  abundance  is  relatively  high  (e.g..  Davis  and  Gray  l%tx  Wilson  et  al. 
N*5?).  although  scasonalin  \aries  species  by  species.  This  study  does  appear  to 
have  been  conducted  early  relative  to  the  life  history  of  some  planthopper  taxa.  for 
example  flatid  nymphs  were  commonly  observed,  but  adults  were  scarce  and  found 
only  at  low  elevations.  Also,  the  habitats  sampled  in  this  study  may  have  dispro- 
portionately represented  relatively  open,  grassy  areas  (roadsides,  fields,  and  balds) 
because  many  rulgoroid  species  feed  on  herbaceous  hosts,  leaving  woody  plant 
feeders  poorly  represented  in  this  study.  Therefore,  the  estimate  of  species  richness 

-  >ented  here  is  more  carefully  circumscribed  as  the  number  of  species  that  can  be 
collected  at  GSMNP  in  mid-July  by  sweeping  in  relatively  accessible  locations.  It 
seems  extremely  likely  that  additional  sampling  methods  (especially  light  collect- 
ing and  vacuum  sampling),  and  a  broader  spatial  and  temporal  scale  of  collecting 
will  ultimately  produce  more  than  50  species  for  the  Park. 

Many  of  the  species  found  in  this  study  are  taxa  that  are  relatively  widespread  in 
occurrence.  A  few  taxa  were  only  collected  at  high  elevations,  and  some  of  these 
represent  unusual  taxa  or  records.  A  Ribautodelphax  species  was  collected  at  two 
locations  on  Clingman's  Dome  Road.  The  total  collection  represented  12"7  speci- 
mens, all  female,  and  mostly  (121  specimens)  brachypterous.  The  reason  for  the 
unusual  sex  ratio  requires  further  investigation  (parthenogenesis  is  known  from 
delphacids  [de  Yrijer  1986.  den  Bieman  and  de  Yrijer  1987].  but  it  is  exceedingly 
unusual).  Three  Ribautodelphax  species  have  been  reported  in  the  New  World  (R. 
pusilla  Emeljanov.  R.  albosmaui  (Fieber).  and  R.  bidenmnis  Anufriev).  whose 
known  New  World  distribution  consists  mostly  of  Canada  and  Alaska,  but  both  also 
are  distributed  widely  in  the  Palearctic  (Wilson  1988.  1992.  199";  Maw  et  al. 
2000).  Ribautodelphax  bidematus  was  reported  from  Canada  by  Maw  and  col- 
leagues (2000).  however  the  correct  combination  for  this  species  appears  to  be 
Mcgadelphax  binotams  (Anufriev)  ( Yilbaste  1980). 

There  is  a  series  of  species  where  GSMNP  represents  the  southernmost  point 
within  the  known  distribution.  These  species,  in  addition  to  Ribautodelphax.  in- 
clude Delphacodes  bifurca.  D.  sagae.  D.  nitens.  D.  penista.  and  Stenocranus  pal- 
lidus  (all  Delphacidae).  Delphacodes  bifurca.  for  example,  was  described  from 
Kansas  (Beamer  1946).  and  later  found  in  Missouri  on  tallgrass  prairie  (with  D. 
Wilson  et  al.  1993).  Delphacodes  bifurca  was  collected  at  both  Andrew's 
and  Gregory  Bald,  but  nowhere  else.  Delphacodes  bifurca.  D.  sagae  (found  only 
on  Clingman's  Dome  Road).  Ribautodelphax  and  possibly  \othodelphax  lineatipes 
(Gregory's  Bald  only,  but  reported  from  Raleigh.  NC:  Wray  1967).  max  be  restrict- 
ed to  high  elevation  in  the  southern  Appalachians. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  KM  253 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  would  particularly  like  to  thank  my  field  assistants  Jeremy  Brodt  and  Mike  Cacciapaglia.  both  stu- 
dents at  the  University  of  Delaware,  and  Keith  Langdon.  Jean  Hilton,  and  Becky  Nichols  (National  Park 
Service.  Gatlinburg.  TN).  This  study  was  conducted  under  the  support  of  a  Discover  Life  In  America 
(DLIA)  grant. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Arnett.  R.  H.,  G.  A.  Samuelson.  and  G.  M.  Nishida.  1993.  The  Insect  and  Spider  Collections  of  the 
World.  Second  Edition.  Flora  and  Fauna  Handbook.  No.  1 1.  Sandhill  Crane  Press,  Inc..  Gainesville. 
Florida.  U.S.A.  vi^310pp. 

Bartlett.  C.  R.  and  I..  I..  Deit/.  2000.  Revision  of  the  New  /orld  Delphacid  Planthopper  Genus 
Pissonotus  (Hemiptera:  Fulgoroidea).  Thomas  Say  Publications  in  Entomology.  Lanham.  Maryland. 
U.S.A.  234  pp. 

Beamer.  R.  H.  1946.  Some  new  species  of  Delphacodes.  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society 
19(4):  139- 144. 

Brimley.  C.  S.  1938.  The  Insects  of  North  Carolina.  North  Carolina  Department  of  Agriculture,  Raleigh, 
NC  560  pp. 

Burnham.  K.  P.  and  \V.  S.  Overton.  1978.  Estimation  of  the  size  of  a  closed  population  when  capture 
probabilities  vary  among  animals.  Biometrika  65:623-633. 

Burnham.  K.  P.  and  \V.  S.  Overton  1979.  Robust  estimation  of  population  size  when  capture  proba- 
bilities vary  among  animals.  Ecology  60:927-936. 

Chao,  A.  1984.  Non-parametric  estimation  of  the  number  of  classes  in  a  population.  Scandinavian 
Journal  of  Statistics  1 1 :265-270. 

Chao,  A.  1987.  Estimating  the  population  size  for  capture-recapture  data  with  unequal  catchability. 
Biometrics  43:783-791. 

Chao.  A..  M.-C.  Ma.  and  M.  C.  K.  Yang.  1 993.  Stopping  rules  and  estimation  for  recapture  debugging 
with  unequal  failure  rates.  Biometrika  80:193-201 

Chazdon.  R.  L..  R.  K.  Colwell.  J.  S.  Denslow.  and  M.  R.  Guariguata.   1998. 

estimating  species  richness  of  woody  regeneration  in  primary  and  secondary  rain  forests  of  NE  Costa 
Rica.  pp.  285-309  In.  F.  Dallmeier  and  J.  A.  Comiskey  (Editors).  Forest  biodiversity  research,  moni- 
toring and  modeling:  Conceptual  background  and  Old  World  case  studies.  Parthenon  Publishing. 
Paris.  France,  xxiii  —  671  pp. 

Colwell.  R.  K.  1997.  EstimateS:  Statistical  estimation  of  species  richness  and  shared  species  from  sam- 
ples. Version  5.  User's  Guide  and  application  published  at:  hrtp:  viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu  estimates. 

Colwell.  R.  K.  and  J.  A.  Coddington.  1994.  Estimating  terrestrial  biodiversity  through  extrapolation. 
Philosophical  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society  of  London.  Series  B  345:101-118. 

Davis.  L.  V.  and  I.  E.  Gray.  1966.  Zonal  and  seasonal  distribution  of  insects  in  North  Carolina  salt 
marshes.  Ecological  Monographs  36(3(:275-295. 

den  Bieman.  C.  F.  M.  and  P.  \V.  F.  de  Vrijer.  1987.  True  parthenogenesis  for  the  first  time  demon- 
strated in  planthoppers  (Homoptera.  Delphacidae).  Annales  de  la  Societe  Entomologique  de  France 
(N.S.)23(l):3-9. 

De  Vrijer.  P.  NV.  F.  1986.  A  parthenogenetic  planthopper  found  in  Greece,  p.  46.  In.  S.  Drosopoulos 
(Editor).  2nd  International  Congress  Concerning  the  Rhynchota  Fauna  of  Balkan  and  Adjacent 
Regions.  18-22  August  1986.  Mikrolimni  -  Prespa.  Greece.  70  pp. 

Hayek.  L.  C.  and  M.  A.  Bu/as.   1996.  Surveying  Natural  Populations.  Columbia  University  Press 
York.  New  York.  U.S.A.  xvii  -  563  pp. 

Heltshe.  J.  and  V  E.  Forrester.  1983.  Estimating  species  richness  using  the  jackknife  procedure. 
Biometrics  39:1-11. 

Hol/inger.  Y\.  E..  A.  F.  Fmeljanov.  and  I.  Kammerlander.  2002.  The  family  Cixiidae  Spinola 
(Hemiptera:  Fulgoromorpha)  -  a  Review,  pp.  113-138.  In,  Holzinger.  W.  (Editor).  Zikaden: 


254  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Leafhoppers,  Planthoppers,  and  Cicadas  (Insecta:  Hemiptera:  Auchenorrhyncha).  Denisia,  Volume 
4.  Obeosterreichisches  Landesmuseum.  Linz,  Austria,  xv  +  673  pp. 

Kramer,  J.  P.  1981.  Taxonomic  Study  of  the  planthopper  genus  Cixiits  in  the  United  States  and  Mex- 
ico (Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea:  Cixiidae).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society 
1 07(1-2):  1-66. 

Kramer,  J.  P.  1983.  Taxonomic  study  of  the  planthopper  family  Cixiidae  in  the  United  States 
(Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea).  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  109:1-57. 

Lee,  S.  M.,  and  A.  Chao.  1994.  Estimating  population  size  via  sample  coverage  for  closed  capture- 
recapture  models.  Biometrics  50:88-97. 

Maw,  H.  E.  L.,  R.  G.  Foottit,  and  K.  G.  A.  Hamilton.  2000.  Checklist  of  the  Hemiptera  of  Canada 
and  Alaska.  NRC  Research  Press,  Ottawa,  Canada,  vii  +  220  pp. 

O'Brien,  L.  B.  1985.  New  synonymies  and  combinations  in  New  World  Fulgoroidea  (Achilidae, 
Delphacidae,  Flatidae,  Fulgoridae:  Homoptera).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America 
78(5):657-662. 

Palmer,  M.  W  1991.  Estimating  species  richness:  The  second-order  jackknife  reconsidered.  Ecology 
72:1512-1513. 

Raaijmakers,  J.  G.  W.   1987.  Statistical  analysis  of  the  Michaelis-Menten  equation.  Biometrics 

43:793-803. 

Sharkey,  M.  J.  2001 .  The  All  Taxa  Biological  Inventory  of  the  Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park. 
Florida  Entomologist  84(4):556-564. 

Smith,  E.  P.  and  G.  van  Belle.  1984.  Nonparametric  estimation  of  species  richness.  Biometrics 
40:119-129. 

Vilbaste,  J.   1980.  Cicada  fauna  of  Tuva.  Valgus  Publishing.  Tallinn,  Estonia.  218  pp. 

Wilson,  S.  W.  1982.  The  planthopper  genus  Prokelisia  in  the  United  States  (Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea: 
Delphacidae).  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society  55(3):532-546. 

Wilson,  S.  W  1988.  Delphacidae  of  Alaska  (Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea).  Great  Basin  Naturalist 
Memoirs  12:335-343. 

Wilson,  S.  W.  1992.  The  Delphacidae  of  Yukon  Territory,  Canada  (Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea).  Insecta 
Mundi6(2):79-100. 

Wilson,  S.  W.  1997.  Delphacid  planthoppers  (Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea:  Delphacidae)  of  the  Yukon, 
pp.  377-385.  In,  H.  V.  Danks  and  J.  A.  Downes  (Editors).  Biological  Survey  of  Canada  (Terrestrial 
Arthropods),  Ottawa,  Canada,  x  +  1034  pp. 

Wilson,  S.  W.  and  J.  E.  McPherson.  1980.  The  distribution  of  the  Fulgoroidea  of  the  Eastern  United 
States  (Homoptera).  Transactions  of  the  Illinois  State  Academy  of  Science  73(4):7-20. 

Wilson,  S.  W.,  C.  Mitter,  R.  F.  Denno,  and  M.  R.  Wilson.  1994.  Evolutionary  patterns  of  host  plant 
use  by  delphacid  planthoppers  and  their  relatives,  pp.  7-45.  In,  R.  F.  Denno  and  T.  J.  Perfect 
(Editors).  Planthoppers:  Their  Ecology  and  Management.  Chapman  and  Hall.  New  York,  New  York, 
U.S.A.  x  +  799  pp. 

Wilson,  S.  W.,  J.  L.  Smith,  and  P.  D.  Calvert.  1993.  Planthoppers  of  a  Missouri  tallgrass  prairie 
(Homoptera:  Fulgoroidea).  Journal  of  the  Kansas  Entomological  Society  66(1):75-80. 

Wray,  D.  L.  1967.  Insects  of  North  Carolina,  Third  Supplement.  North  Carolina  Department  of 
Agriculture.  Raleigh,  North  Carolina,  U.S.A.  181  pp. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 255 

TAXONOMIC  AND  ECOLOGICAL  NOTES  ON 

LEUCOTRICHIA  PICTIPES  (TRICHOPTERA: 

HYDROPTILIDAE),  A  MICROCADDISFLY  NEWLY 

RECORDED  FROM  OHIO,  U.S.A.1 

J.  B.  Keiper  and  R.  J.  Bartolotta1 

ABSTRACT:  The  microcaddisfly  Leucotrichia  pictipes  (Banks)  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae)  was 
collected  for  the  first  time  in  Ohio  at  the  Chagrin  River  in  Cuyahoga  County,  and  the  mature  larva  is 
described.  We  give  details  on  the  larval  habitat  in  an  attempt  to  describe  the  ecological  requirements 
for  this  species  in  Ohio. 

KEY  WORDS:  Leucotrichia,  Trichoptera,  Hydroptilidae,  Ohio  (U.S.A.),  new  state  record. 

The  caddisfly  genus  Leucotrichia  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae)  is  a  new  world 
taxon  (Flint  1970)  with  three  species  in  the  United  States  (Wiggins  1996). 
Leucotrichia  pictipes  (Banks)  has  a  northern  distribution  (Flint  1970)  where  it 
builds  fixed  retreats  on  riffle  rocks  in  streams  and  grazes  periphyton  (McAuliffe 
1982).  Although  widespread  in  North  America,  this  species  has  not  been  report- 
ed from  Ohio.  Light  trapping  for  adults  has  been  conducted  intensively  near  Ohio 
streams,  particularly  in  the  northeast  (Huryn  and  Foote  1983),  but  no  adults  have 
been  taken.  Adults  are  not  readily  attracted  to  lights,  and  survey  work  for  larval 
Trichoptera  throughout  the  state  by  the  senior  author  has  not  previously  produced 
immatures  of  this  species.  Leucotrichia  pictipes  occurs  in  states  adjacent  to  Ohio, 
such  as  Michigan,  Pennsylvania,  and  Kentucky  (Blickle  1979).  We  recently  col- 
lected L.  pictipes  for  the  first  time  in  Ohio,  and  investigated  the  ecological  con- 
ditions of  the  larval  habitat.  During  our  investigation,  we  found  that  although 
brief  larval  descriptions  and  illustrations  have  been  given  in  the  excellent  works 
of  Ross  (1944),  Flint  (1970),  McAuliffe  (1982),  and  Wiggins  (1996),  no  detailed 
morphological  description  of  the  mature  larva  is  available.  To  supplement  the 
data  provided  by  previous  investigators,  we  give  a  description  of  the  fifth  instar 
to  provide  details  similar  to  those  given  for  other  Ohio  Hydroptilidae  (e.g.,  Keip- 
er 1999,  2002;  Keiper  and  Foote  1999). 

METHODS 

On  September  14,  2001,  six  fifth  instars  were  collected  from  the  upper  sur- 
faces of  riffle  rocks  of  the  Chagrin  River  0.5  km  south  (upstream)  from  the 
Fairmount  Road  bridge  in  Hunting  Valley,  Cuyahoga  County,  Ohio  (41.4846°N, 
81.3949°W).  On  14  September  2002  six  additional  larvae  and  numerous  fixed 


1  Received  for  publication   March  27,  2003.  Accepted  on  March  25,  2004. 

: Cleveland  Museum  of  Natural  History,   1   Wade  Oval  Drive,  Cleveland,  Ohio  44106.  E-mail: 
jkeiperfacmnh.org. 

'Cleveland  Museum  of  Natural  History,  1  Wade  Oval  Dr.,  Cleveland,  Ohio  44106.  E-mail:  rbartolot 
@cmnh.org. 

Mailed  on  September  30.  2004 


256 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


retreats  were  taken.  All  larvae  were  placed  in  KAA  solution  (Wiggins  1996)  and 
transferred  to  70  percent  ethanol  after  24  hours.  Specimens  (n  =  12)  were  exam- 
ined with  a  Leica  MZ-12.5  microscope,  and  measurements  were  taken  with 
image  analysis  software;  only  undamaged  specimens  were  used  for  length  and 
width  (n  ==  6).  All  specimens  are  currently  housed  in  the  Department  of 
Invertebrate  Zoology  of  the  Cleveland  Museum  of  Natural  History. 

Water  chemistry  and  stream  bed  composition  data  were  collected  at  the  site  34 
times  since  1985,  primarily  in  the  months  of  June,  July,  September  and  October. 
Values  are  reported  as  mean  ±  1  S.D.  unless  otherwise  noted.  These  data  have 
been  generated  in  conjunction  with  stream  water  quality  monitoring  for  the  Ohio 
Department  of  Natural  Resources  (ODNR),  Division  of  Natural  Areas  and  Pre- 
serves, Scenic  Rivers  Program.  This  site  is  designated  by  ODNR  as  Chagrin 
River  21.0  (Ohio  Department  of  Natural  Resources  2001). 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Fifth  Instar:  Total  length,  x  =  2.45  ±  0.45  mm. 

Head  capsule:  width  x"  =  0.27  ±  0.05  mm;  dark  brown,  labrum  blackish-brown,  eyespot  black  with 
pale  ring;  long  seta  lacking  near  eye  spot;  mandibles  asymmetrical,  left  broad  and  robustly  cusped 
with  one  seta  on  posterolateral  corner,  pubescent  setae  on  inner  margin,  darker  posteriorly;  right 
pointed  apically,  one  seta  on  posterolateral  corner,  lacking  setae  on  inner  margin  (Fig.  1 ). 

Thorax:  All  notal  sclerites  brown  with  blackish  periphery,  dark  margin  thicker  along  posterior 
border;  pronotal  sclerite  convex  anteriorly,  meso-  and  metanotal  sclerites  flat  anteriorly;  prosternal 
sclerites  small,  sub-circular,  widely  separated  along  posterior  margin,  positioned  near  posterior  cor- 
ner of  trochantin;  meso-  and  metathoracic  sterna  lacking  sclerites;  soft  tissue  of  thoracic  segments 
milky  white  with  scattered  green  blotches  (completely  green  in  life);  legs  uniformly  dark  brown, 
foreleg  "x  =  0.42  ±  0.05  mm,  midleg  x"  =  0.46  ±  0.05  mm,  hindleg  ?c  =  0.45  ±  0.03  mm,  leg  ratio 
0.91:1.00:0.98. 


Fig.  1.  Right  and  left  mandibles  of  fifth  instar  Leucotrichia  pictipes,  ventral  view. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  257 


Abdomen:  Milky  white,  concolorous  with  thoracic  soft  tissue,  completely  green  in  life;  widest  at 
segments  5  and  6  (x"  =  0.59  ±  0.29  mm);  first  abdominal  segment  with  posterodorsal  sclerite  0.20- 
0.25x  as  long  as  metathoracic  sclerite;  segments  2-7  each  with  small  sub-rectangular  brown  sclerite; 
segment  8  with  rectangular  sclerite  approximately  0.25x  length  of  metathoracic  sclerite;  segment  9 
with  rectangular  dorsal  brown  sclerite;  segment  10  with  prolegs,  each  with  sheath-like  sclerite  posi- 
tioned laterad,  prolegs  with  apical  hook  strongly  curved  to  900  angle;  abdominal  setal  areas  sa2  a 
small  sclerotized  dot  with  one  seta,  sa3  similar  to  sa2  but  with  2  setae.  Refer  to  figures  given  in  Ross 
(1944,  p.  120),  McAuliffe  (1982,  p.  1559),  and  Wiggins  (1996,  p.  89)  for  further  illustrations  of  lar- 
val and  case  morphology. 

Average  water  depth  was  39.8  (15.0)  cm,  pH  was  7.2  (0.7),  and  water  tem- 
perature was  21.5  (3.2)  °C.  Total  suspended  solids  (TSS)  were  only  measured 
four  times  (2000-2002)  with  a  mean  of  24.7  (5.5)  mg/L.  One  TSS  reading  was 
411  mg/L  and  treated  as  an  outlier;  this  value  was  the  result  of  heavy  rains  and 
subsequent  siltation,  and  illustrates  the  variability  of  physical  parameters  that 
L.  pictipes  and  other  invertebrate  taxa  face  in  the  Chagrin  River.  Bed  composi- 
tion of  the  riffle  varied  from  50-80  percent  gravel  and  cobble  with  few  boulders, 
with  the  remainder  composed  of  sand  and  silt.  Since  1985,  the  Cumulative  Index 
Value  has  averaged  22.6  (5.8)  which  represents  the  low  end  of  the  excellent  range 
(Ohio  Department  of  Natural  Resources  2001).  Benthic  macroinvertebrates  co- 
occurring  with  L.  pictipes  often  included  water  penny  beetle  larvae  (Coleoptera: 
Psephenidae),  riffle  beetle  adults  (Elmidae),  mayfly  nymphs  (Ephemeroptera), 
stonefly  nymphs  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae),  dobsonfly  larvae  (Megaloptera:  Coryda- 
lidae),  net-spinning  caddisfly  larvae  (Trichoptera:  Hydropsychidae),  damselfly 
nymphs  (Odonata:  Coenagrionidae),  crane  fly  larvae  (Diptera:  Tipulidae),  midge 
larvae  (Diptera:  Chironomidae),  crayfish  (Decapoda),  aquatic  worms  (Annelida), 
leeches  (Hirudinea),  clams  (Bivalvia:  Sphaeriidae),  and  pouch  snails  (Gastro- 
poda: Physidae).  Overall,  the  Chagrin  River  represents  a  clean  water  stream  with 
a  large  proportion  of  gravel  and  cobble  in  the  substrate  that  supports  a  diverse 
macroinvertebrate  assemblage. 

The  cause  for  the  narrow  distribution  of  L.  pictipes  in  Ohio  remains  unknown. 
The  habitat  parameters  and  macroinvertebrate  assemblage  of  the  Chagrin  River, 
while  in  seemingly  good  condition  for  its  proximity  to  a  major  metropolitan  area 
(Cleveland),  do  not  appear  unusual.  However,  our  information  illustrates  the 
benefits  of  repeated  collections  of  immatures  and  adults  even  when  an  area  has 
been  well-studied.  The  fixed  retreats  of  L.  pictipes  are  firmly  attached  to  rock 
substrates  (McAuliffe  1982)  making  them  difficult  to  obtain  with  standard  sam- 
pling devices  such  as  kick  nets.  The  larvae  were  initially  found  in  2001  only  after 
lifting  a  riffle  rock  from  the  water  and  examining  the  surface  closely.  However, 
studies  of  adult  distribution  and  abundance  have  also  failed  to  obtain  this  species. 
It  is  also  possible  that  L.  pictipes  has  only  recently  become  established  in  Ohio 
and  the  Chagrin  River. 

The  final  instar  of  L.  pictipes  is  easily  distinguished  from  other  co-occurring 
species  of  Hydroptilidae  based  on  the  enlarged  abdomen.  However,  other  char- 
acters are  notably  different  from  other  microcaddisflies.  The  legs  of  L.  pictipes 
are  subequal,  whereas  other  species  for  which  the  larvae  are  described  exhibit  a 
shortened  foreleg  compared  to  the  middle  and  hind  legs.  The  prosternal  sclerites 


258  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


of  L.  pictipes  are  quite  small  and  widely  separated,  whereas  other  genera  possess 
large  sclerites  that  are  approximated  medially.  Lastly,  each  dorsal  abdominal 
sclerite  is  large,  dark,  conspicuous,  and  lacking  central  membranous  areas. 

The  larval  morphology  is  fairly  unusual  for  Hydroptilidae  and  Trichoptera  in 
general  as  is  typical  for  the  tribe  Leucotrichiini,  as  the  abdominal  segments  are 
greatly  distended.  Enlarged  abdomens  are  also  seen  in  Zumatrichia  (Flint  1970, 
Wiggins  1996)  and  Wiggins'  (1996,  p.  75)  key  to  hydroptilid  genera  gives  char- 
acters that  separate  Zumatrichia  and  Leucotrichia.  The  mandibles  of  L.  pictipes 
are  asymmetrical,  which  is  the  norm  for  microcaddisflies  (see  Keiper  and  Foote 
2000,  Keiper  2002,  and  references  therein).  When  compared  to  other  species  of 
Hydroptilidae,  the  mandibles  exhibit  similarity  to  species  that  specialize  at  pierc- 
ing algal  cells  and  draining  their  contents,  such  as  Hydroptila  (Nielsen  1948, 
Keiper  and  Foote  1999,  2000),  Oxyethira  (Nielsen  1948,  Keiper  and  Walton 
1999,  Keiper  2002),  and  Orthotrichia  (Nielsen  1948,  Keiper  2002),  or  species 
that  are  more  generalized  trophically  and  scrape  periphyton  and  pierce  large  algal 
cells,  such  as  Ochrotrichia  (Keiper  and  Foote  2000).  In  all  those  taxa,  the  right 
mandible  is  more  pointed  than  the  left,  and  indeed  those  species  that  pierce  algal 
cells  invariably  maintain  a  grip  on  the  algal  cell  with  the  strongly  cusped  or  ser- 
rated left  mandible  while  the  acutely  pointed  right  punctures  the  cell  wall.  The 
mandibles  of  L.  pictipes  are  strongly  cusped  and  seemingly  appropriate  for  scrap- 
ing algal  substrates  (McAuliffe  1982),  but  the  outer  cusp  of  the  right  mandible  is 
pointed  even  though  there  is  no  evidence  that  this  species  attacks  large  algal 
cells.  The  setae  on  the  inner  edge  of  the  left  mandible  are  strongly  textured  with 
pubescence  not  seen  on  other  microcaddisfly  scrapers  such  as  Ochrotrichia.  The 
advantage  to  having  the  inner  setae  pubescent  is  unknown,  but  may  aid  the  col- 
lection of  scraped  material  (e.g.  diatoms).  This  synthesis  of  mandibular  mor- 
phology information  among  Hydroptilidae  suggests  that  larvae  were  originally 
adapted  to  feed  on  algal  filaments  (such  as  the  green  alga  Cladophora).  Leuco- 
trichia then  radiated  to  the  scraping  guild,  retaining  some  of  the  primitive  mor- 
phological characters  such  as  an  acutely  pointed  right  mandible  that  does  not  aid 
the  scraping  of  periphyton.  However,  because  the  immatures  of  only  a  handful  of 
the  approximately  300  Nearctic  species  (Morse  1993)  have  been  described,  this 
hypothesis  remains  tentative. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Marianne  Stanczak  and  Biz  Turnell  for  their  help  collecting  specimens.  M.  Stanczak 
and  Joseph  T.  Hannibal  (CMNH)  kindly  reviewed  a  draft  of  this  paper.  Descriptions  of  larvae  were 
facilitated  with  support  from  the  National  Science  Foundation  (award  no.  0216039). 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  259 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Blickle,  R.  L.  1979.  Hydroptilidae  (Trichoptera)  of  America  north  of  Mexico.  University  of  New 
Hampshire,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin,  509.  97  pp. 

Flint,  O.  S.  1970.  Studies  of  Neotropical  caddisflies,  X:  Lecotrichia  and  related  genera  from  North 
and  Central  America  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae).  Smithsonian  Contributions  to  Zoology  60:1- 

64. 

Huryn,  A.  D.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1983.  An  annotated  list  of  the  Trichoptera  of  Ohio.  Proceedings  of 
the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  85:783-796. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  1999.  Morphology  of  final  instar  Ochrotrichia  xena  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae). 
Entomological  News  110:231-235. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  2002.  Biology  and  immature  stages  of  coexisting  Hydroptilidae  (Trichoptera)  from 
northeastern  Ohio  lakes.  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  95:608-616. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  1 999.  Biology  and  immature  stages  of  two  species  of  Hydroptila 
(Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae)  which  consume  Cladophora  (Chlorophyta).  Proceedings  of  the  En- 
tomological Society  of  Washington  101:514-521. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  and  B.  A.  Foote.  2000.  Biology  and  larval  feeding  habits  of  coexisting  Hydroptilidae 
(Trichoptera)  from  a  small  woodland  stream  in  northeastern  Ohio.  Annals  of  the  Entomological 
Society  of  America  92:225-234. 

Keiper,  J.  B.  and  W.  E.  Walton.   1 999.  Biology  and  morphology  of  the  mature  larva  of  Oxyethira 

arizona  Ross  (Trichoptera:  Hydroptilidae).  The  Pan-Pacific  Entomologist  75:212-220. 

McAuliffe,  J.  R.  1982.  Behavior  and  life  history  of  Leucotrichia  pictipes  (Banks)  (Trichoptera: 
Hydroptilidae)  with  special  emphasis  on  case  reoccupancy.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology 
60:1557-1561. 

Morse,  J.  C.  1993.  A  checklist  of  the  Trichoptera  of  North  America,  including  Greenland  and 
Mexico.  Transactions  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  119:47-93. 

Nielsen,  A.  1948.  Postembryonic  development  and  biology  of  the  Hydroptilidae.  Det  Kongelige 
Danske  Videnskabers  Selskabs  Skrifter.  5:1-200. 

Ohio  Department  of  Natural  Resources.  2001.  Stream  Quality  Monitoring  Annual  Report. 
Chagrin  State  Scenic  River.  Ohio  Department  of  Natural  Resources,  Division  of  Natural  Areas 
and  Preserves.  Columbus,  Ohio,  U.S.A.  23  pp. 

Ross,  H.  H.  1944.  The  caddis  flies,  or  Trichoptera,  of  Illinois.  Bulletin  of  the  Illinois  Natural 
History  Survey.  23:1-326. 

Wiggins,  G.  B.  1 996.  Larvae  of  the  North  American  caddisfly  genera  (Trichoptera),  2nd  ed.  Uni- 
versity of  Toronto  Press,  Buffalo,  New  York,  U.S.A.  457  pp. 


260  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BREVICORYNELLA  (HEMIPTERA:  APHIDIDAE), 

A  NEWLY  RECORDED  GENUS  FROM  CHINA, 

WITH  THE  DESCRIPTION  OF  A  NEW  SPECIES 

AND  A  NEW  RECORD1 

Gexia  Qiao2,  Liyun  Jiang1,  and  Guangxue  Zhang4 

ABSTRACT:  The  aphid  genus,  Breviconmella  Nevsky,  is  newly  recorded  from  China.  A  new 
species,  Brevicorynella  sexmaculata  Qiao,  Jiang,  and  Zhang,  and  a  new  record  for  China,  B.  quadri- 
maculata  Nevsky,  are  described.  Tamarix  sp.  (Tamaricaceae)  is  the  host  plant  genus  for  both  species. 

KEY  WORDS:  Insecta,  Aphididae,  Macrosiphinae,  Brevicorynella,  new  species,  new  record, 
Tamarix,  China. 

Nevsky  (1929)  erected  Brevicorynella  in  the  Aphidinae  for  Brevicorynella 
quadrimaculata  collected  from  Tamarix  sp.  (Tamaricaceae)  in  Kazakhstan  and 
Tadzhikistan  in  Central  Asia.  By  careful  examination,  those  specimens  from 
Xinjiang  Autonomous  Region,  China,  include  two  species,  such  as  type  species 
and  a  new  species,  Brevicoryella  sexmaculata.  The  host  plants  of  Brevicorynella, 
Tamarix  spp.,  are  important  sand  binders  in  northwestern  China.  Biological  stud- 
ies on  these  aphids  will  have  important  effects  on  preventing  deserts  and  binding 
sands. 

Breviconmella  Nevsky  was  originally  described  in  the  Aphidinae  because  the 
distance  between  stigmal  pori  on  2nd  and  3rd  abdominal  segments  is  less  than 
twice  as  long  as  the  distance  between  stigmal  pori  on  1  st  and  2nd  abdominal  seg- 
ments. Also,  its  antennae  are  similar  to  in  Brachyunguis  (Blackman  and  Eastop, 
1994).  However,  Remaudiere  and  Remaudiere  (1997)  placed  Brevicorynella  in 
the  Macrosiphinae.  The  correct  placement  of  Brevicorynella  is  still  in  question. 
Here,  we  follow  Remaudiere  and  Remaudiere  (1997)  and  think  genus  Brevicory- 
nella is  in  Macrosiphinae,  based  on  lacking  lateral  abdominal  tubercles.  These 
have  the  same  shape  of  siphunculi  as  Brevicoryne  van  der  Goot  (in  the  Macrosi- 
phinae). 

METHODS 

The  specimens  were  collected  from  inflorescences,  leaves,  and  stems  of 
Tamarix  located  in  the  Xinjiang  Autonomous  Region  of  the  People's  Republic  of 
China  (Baicheng  County,  1280m;  Jinghe  County,  300m;  Minfeng  County, 


1  Received  on  December  24,  2002.  Accepted  on  May  24,  2004. 

:  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  25  Beisihuanxi  Road,  Haidian,  Beijing  100080, 
P.R.  China.  E-mail:  qiaogx(a'panda. ioz.ac.cn. 

1  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  Beijing  100080  P.  R.  China.  E-mail:  jiangliyun 
2000@hotmail.com 

'  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  Beijing  100080  P.  R.  China.  E-mail:  zhanggx@ 
panda.ioz.ac.cn 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 261 

1300m;  Shihezi  City,  450m)  by  Liyun  Jiang.  All  specimens  are  deposited  in  the 
Zoological  Museum,  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences, 
Beijing,  China.  Nomenclature  and  descriptions  follow  Nevsky  (1929).  All  meas- 
urements are  given  in  millimeters  (mm). 

Brevicorynella  Nevsky,  1929  NEW  RECORD  FOR  CHINA 

Brevicorynella  Nevsky,  1929,  Bull.  PI.  Prot.  Stn.,  Taskennt,  16:257. 

Brevicorynella  Nevsky:  Blackman  and  Eastop,  1994:587;  Remaudiere  and  Remaudiere,  1997:82. 

Type  Species.  Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky,  1929,  by  original  des- 
ignation. 

Diagnosis.  Body  elliptical,  posterior  of  abdomen  tapered.  Frons  convex;  front- 
al tubercles  indistinct.  Eyes  protuberant,  lacking  ocular  tubercles.  Antennae  6-seg- 
mented,  shorter  than  body;  antennal  segment  III  with  1  or  2  small  round  second- 
ary rhinaria  medially;  processus  terminalis  1/4-1/3  base  of  the  segment.  Meso- 
sternal  furca  with  separated  two  arms.  All  first  tarsal  segments  bearing  5  setae. 
Spiracular  plates  well-developed,  long  finger-shaped  in  thorax,  or  lower  cone  in 
abdomen;  spiracles  small  rounded,  posteriorly.  Pronotum  with  2  pairs  of  short  cy- 
lindrical spinal  tubercles  and  1  pair  of  cone  marginal  tubercles.  Abdomen  without 
marginal  tubercles,  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  4  to  6  large  dorsal  patches.  Siphun- 
culi  short,  slightly  swollen,  constricted  at  basally,  and  with  apical  flange;  on  5th 
abdominal  segment.  Cauda  tongue-shaped,  slightly  constricted  at  medially. 

Host  plants.   Tamarix  spp.  (Tamaricaceae) 

Distribution.  In  Central  Asia  (China,  Kazakhstan  and  Tadzhikistan). 

The  genus  is  represented  by  two  species:  Brevicotynella  quadrimaculata 
Nevsky  and  Brevicorynella  sexmaculata  Qiao  and  Zhang  new  species.  This  is  the 
first  record  of  Breviconmella  for  China. 


KEY  TO  SPECIES  APTEROUS  VIVIPAROUS  FEMALE 
BREVICORYNELLA  FROM  CHINA 

Vertex  without  distinct  sculptures;  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  2  pairs  of  large  spino-pleural  patches; 

siphunculi  distinctly  shorter  than  cauda;  cauda  with  30-39  hairs 

Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky 

Vertex  with  distinct  sculptures;  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  3  pairs  of  large  spino-pleural  patches; 

siphunculi  about  as  long  as  or  slightly  longer  than  cauda;  cauda  with  48-59  hairs 

Brevicorynella  sexmaculata  n.  sp. 


Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky,  1929  NEW  DISTRIBUTION 

(Figs.  1-7,  18-28) 

Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky,  1929:257-259. 

Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky:   Blackman  and   hustop.    1994:5X7;   Remaudiere  and  Re- 
maudiere. 1997:82. 


262  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Diagnosis:  This  species  is  close  to  Brevicorynella  sexmaculata  Qiao,  Jiang, 
and  Zhang,  but  differs  from  the  latter  (parenthesized)  as  follows:  vertex  without 
distinct  sculptures  (vertex  with  distinct  sculptures);  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  2 
pairs  of  large  spino-pleural  patches  (dorsum  of  abdomen  with  3  pairs  of  large 
spino-pleural  patches);  siphunculi  distinctly  shorter  than  cauda  (siphunculi  about 
as  long  as  or  slightly  longer  than  cauda);  cauda  with  30-39  hairs  (cauda  with  48- 

59  hairs). 

Description  of  apterous  viviparous  females.  Body  (Fig.  18)  small,  oval,  dark  green  in  life  with 
2  pairs  of  black  patches  on  dorsum  of  abdomen  (Fig.  19),  and  covered  with  a  fine  pruinose  secretion, 
1.200- 1.300mm  long,  0.725-0. 825mm  wide  at  thorax.  In  mounted  specimens:  dorsal  of  head,  apex  of 
rostrum,  1st  antennal  segment,  distal  of  3rd  antennal  segment,  tip  of  4th  and  5th  segments,  distal  half 
of  basal  of  6th  segment,  distal  1/3  of  tibia  and  tarsi  darkly  brown;  eyes,  femora,  cauda,  anal  plate,  and 
genital  plate  brown;  2nd  antennal  segment,  processus  terminalis,  and  siphunculi  pale  brown;  others 
pale. 

Vertex  arc-shaped,  antennal  tubercles  weak  (Figs.  1,  20).  Dorsal  hairs  of  body  fine  and  pointed. 
Head  with  2  pairs  of  cephalic  hairs,  4  or  5  dorsal  hairs  between  two  antennae,  and  2-3  pairs  of  dor- 
sal hairs  between  eyes  (Fig.  1).  Length  of  cephalic  hairs  0.021-0.031  mm,  0.8x-1.2x  as  long  as  widest 
diameter  of  3rd  antennal  segment.  Antennae  6-segmented  (Figs.  2,  21),  shorter,  0.613-0.721  mm 
long,  0.49x-0.58x  as  long  as  body;  3rd-6th  segments  with  weak  imbrications.  Proportion  of  lst-6th 
segments:  52:  38:  100:  96:  95:  85+32;  processus  terminalis  0.36x-0.41x  as  long  as  basal  part.  Anten- 
nal hairs  short  and  pointed,  lst-6th  segments  each  with  4  or  5,  2  or  3,  2-5,  3  or  4,  2-7,  3+0  hairs, 
respectively;  apex  of  processus  terminalis  with  3  hairs;  length  of  hairs  on  3rd  antennal  segment  0.018 
mm,  0.69x  as  long  as  widest  diameter  of  this  segment.  Middle  of  3rd  antennal  segment  with  one  small 
round  secondary  rhinarium.  Rostrum  reaching  2nd  to  3rd  abdominal  segments;  ultimate  rostral  seg- 
ment wedge-shaped  (Figs.  3,  22),  2x-2.22x  as  long  as  its  basal  diameter,  0.68x  as  long  as  2nd  seg- 
ment of  hind  tarsi,  with  2  accessory  hairs.  Thorax  tergum  membranous.  Pronotum  with  2-4  spinal,  1 
pair  of  pleural  and  1  pair  of  marginal  hairs;  with  2  pairs  of  short  cylindrical  spinal  tubercles  and  1 
pair  of  cone  marginal  tubercles.  Hind  femur  0.330-0.361  mm  long,  2.35x-2.65x  as  long  as  3rd  anten- 
nal segment.  Hind  tibia  0.515-0.577  mm  long,  0.38x-0.41x  as  long  as  body.  Hairs  on  legs  short  and 
pointed;  length  of  hairs  on  hind  tibia  0.036-0.046  mm,  1.18x-1.5x  as  long  as  middle  diameter  of  the 
segment.  First  tarsal  chaetotaxy:  5,  5,  5.  Mesosternal  furca  with  two  arms  separated.  Abdomen  ter- 
gum membranous,  with  2  pairs  of  large  brown  spino-pleural  patches  on  2nd  and  5th  abdominal  ter- 
gites  (Fig.  4);  dorsal  hairs  on  abdominal  tergites  short  and  pointed;  1st  abdominal  tergite  with  9-12 
hairs;  8th  tergite  with  8  hairs,  6  or  7,  occasionally.  Length  of  marginal  hairs  on  1st  tergite  0.021-0.031 
mm,  which  of  dorsal  hairs  on  8th  tergite  0.026-0.042  mm,  0.8x-1.2xand  lx-1.6x  as  long  as  widest 
diameter  of  3rd  antennal  segment,  respectively.  Spiracles  (Figs.  23,  27)  small,  round  and  posteriorly 
directed,  spiracular  plates  well-developed,  long  finger-shaped  thoracially,  or  lower  cone  in 
abdomendly,  brown.  Siphunculi  short,  slightly  swollen,  constricted  at  base,  with  flange  (Figs.  5,  28), 
with  weakly  imbrications;  0.093-0.124  mm  in  length,  distal  diameter  0.04  mm,  length  2.25x-2.5x  as 
long  as  its  basal  width,  0.75x-0.91x  as  long  as  cauda.  Cauda  tongue-shaped,  slightly  constricted 
medially  (Figs.  6,  24),  with  weakly  spinulose  short  imbrications,  0.113-0.134  mm  long,  0.92x-l.()8x 
as  long  as  its  basal  diameter,  with  30-39  hairs.  Anal  plate  (Fig.  25)  circular  at  apex  with  weakly  spin- 
ulose short  imbrications  and  40-54  hairs.  Genital  plate  (Figs.  7,  26)  with  13-17  hairs,  2  anterior  hairs 
among  them. 

Alate  and  oviparae:  Not  seen. 

Examined  Specimens.  7  apterous  viviparous  females,  deposited  in  Zoological  Museum.  Institute 
of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  P.  R.  China,  data:  CHINA,  XINJIANG  AUTONOMOUS 
REGION,  JINGHE  Co.:  82.9°E,  44.6°N,  300  m,  30  Aug.  2002,  on  Taimirix  chinensis.  by  Liyun  Jiang 
(No.  13742);  3  apterous  viviparous  females,  deposited  in  Zoological  Museum,  Institute  of  Zoology, 
Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  P.R.China,  data:  CHINA,  XINJIANG  AUTONOMOUS  REGION, 
SHIHEZI  CITY.:  86.0°E,  44.2°N,  300  m,  17  Aug.  2002,  on  Tamarix  chinensis.  by  Liyun  Jiang  (No. 
13659);  7  apterous  viviparous  females,  deposited  in  Zoological  Museum,  Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese 
Academy  of  Sciences,  P.  R.China,  data:  CHINA,  XINJIANG  AUTONOMOUS  REGION,  M1NFENG 
Co.:  82.6°E,  37.0°N,  300  m,  27  Sep.  2002,  on  Tamarix  chinensis,  by  Liyun  Jiang  (No.  14012). 

Distribution.  Central  Asia:  China:  Xinjiang  (Jinghe,  Shihezi,  Minfeng);  Kazakhstan,  Tadzhikis- 
tan. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  263 


Biology.  The  aphids  cluster  on  floscules,  leaves,  and  stems  of  Tamarix  chinensis  or  Tamarix  sp., 
and  are  attended  by  ants. 


Brevicorynella  sexmaculata  Qiao  and  Zhang,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  8-17,29-39) 

Diagnosis.  The  new  species  is  near  to  Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata  Nevsky, 
but  differs  from  it  as  follow:  vertex  with  distinct  sculptures  (the  latter:  vertex 
without  distinct  sculptures);  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  3  pairs  of  large  spino-pleu- 
ral  patches  (the  latter:  dorsum  of  abdomen  with  2  pairs  of  large  spino-pleural 
patches);  siphunculi  about  as  long  as  or  slightly  longer  than  cauda  (the  latter: 
siphunculi  distinctly  shorter  than  cauda);  cauda  with  48-59  hairs  (the  latter: 

cauda  with  30-39  hairs). 

Description  of  apterous  viviparous  females.  Body  (Fig.  29)  medium,  oval,  green  in  life  with  3 
pairs  of  black  patches  on  dorsum  of  abdomen  (Fig.  30),  and  covered  with  a  fine  pruinose  secretion, 
1.250- 1.625mm  long,  0.875-1 .200mm  wide.  In  mounted  specimens:  dorsal  of  head,  apex  of  rostrum, 
distal  of  3rd  and  4th  antennal  segments,  distal  1/3  of  5th  segment,  distal  half  of  basal  of  6th  segment, 
processus  terminalis,  outer  distal  half  of  femora,  basal  and  distal  1/3  of  tibia,  tarsi,  cauda,  and  anal 
plate  darkly  brown;  1st  antennal  segment  brown;  2nd  antennal  segment  pale  brown;  others  pale. 

Vertex  arc-shaped,  antennal  tubercles  weak  (Figs.  8,  31).  Dorsal  of  head  with  distinct  sculptures. 
Dorsal  hairs  of  body  fine,  acute.  Head  with  2  pairs  of  cephalic  hairs,  5-7  dorsal  hairs  between  two 
antennae,  and  2  pairs  of  dorsal  hairs  between  eyes  (Fig.  8).  Length  of  cephalic  hairs  0.031-0.036  mm, 
1.17x-1.4x  as  long  as  widest  diameter  of  3rd  antennal  segment.  Antennae  6-segmented  (Figs.  9,  32), 
shorter,  0.793-0. 892mm  long,  0.53x-0.6x  as  long  as  body;  3rd-6th  segments  with  weak  imbrications. 
Proportion  of  lst-6th  segments:  33:  33:  100:  88:  88:  74+24;  processus  terminalis  0.29x-0.38x  as  long 
as  basal  part.  Antennal  hairs  short,  acute,  lst-6th  segments  each  with  4  or  5,  3,  3-6,  3-6,  3  or  4,  2-4+0 
hairs,  respectively;  apex  of  processus  terminalis  with  3  hairs;  length  of  hairs  on  3rd  antennal  segment 
0.015-0.021  mm,  0.5x  -0.8x  as  long  as  widest  diameter  of  this  segment.  One  small  rounded  second- 
ary rhinarium  on  middle  of  3rd  antennal  segment.  Rostrum  reaching  1st  to  3rd  abdominal  segments; 
ultimate  rostral  segment  wedge-shaped  (Figs.  10,  33),  2x-2.22x  as  long  as  its  basal  diameter,  0.68x 
as  long  as  2nd  segment  of  hind  tarsi,  with  2  accessory  hairs.  Thorax  tergum  membranous.  Pronotum 
with  2  pairs  of  spinal,  1  pair  of  pleural  and  1  pair  of  marginal  hairs;  with  2  pairs  of  short  cylindrical 
spinal  tubercles  and  1  pair  of  cone  marginal  tubercles  (Figs.  11,  31).  Hind  femur  0.391-0.422  mm 
long,  2.05x-2.17x  as  long  as  3rd  antennal  segment.  Hind  tibia  0.639-0.721  mm  long,  0.43x-0.49x  as 
long  as  body.  Hairs  on  legs  short  and  pointed;  length  of  hairs  on  hind  tibia  0.046-0.052  mm,  1.32x- 
1.67x  as  long  as  middle  diameter  of  the  segment.  First  tarsal  chaetotaxy:  5,  5,  5.  Mesosternal  furca 
with  two  arms  separated.  Abdomen  tergum  membranous,  with  3  pairs  of  large  brown  spino-pleural 
patches  on  2nd  -  5th  abdominal  tergites  (Figs.  14,  30);  dorsal  hairs  on  abdominal  tergites  short  and 
pointed;  1st  abdominal  tergite  with  7-1 1  hairs;  8th  tergite  with  6  hairs,  or  7,  occasionally.  Length  of 
marginal  hairs  on  1st  tergite  0.31  mm,  which  of  dorsal  hairs  on  8th  tergite  0.031-0.052  mm,  lx-1.2x 
and  lx-2x  as  long  as  widest  diameter  of  3rd  antennal  segment,  respectively.  Spiracles  small,  round 
and  posterior-ward,  spiracular  plates  very  developed,  brown;  long  finger-shaped  in  thorax  (Figs.  12, 
34),  or  lower  cone  in  abdomen  (Figs.  13,  38).  Siphunculi  short,  slightly  swollen,  constricted  at  base, 
with  flange  (Figs.  15,  39),  with  weakly  imbrications;  0.144-0.165  mm  in  length,  distal  diameter  0.045 
mm,  length  2.33x-4x  as  long  as  its  basal  width,  0.93x-1.07x  as  long  as  cauda.  Cauda  tongue-shaped, 
non-constricted  medially  (Figs.  16,  35),  with  weakly  spinulose  short  imbrications,  0.144-0.165  mm 
in  length,  1.08x-1.33x  as  long  as  its  basal  diameter,  with  48-59  hairs.  Anal  plate  (Figs.  17,  36)  circu- 
lar at  apex  with  weakly  spinulose  short  imbrications  and  51-68  hairs.  Genital  plate  (Figs.  18,  37)  with 
18-21  hairs,  2  anterior  hairs  among  them. 

Alate  and  oviparae:  Not  seen. 

Types.  Ilolotype,  apterous  viviparous  female  (Figs.  8-17),  deposited  in  Zoological  Museum, 
Institute  of  Zoology,  Chinese  Academy  of  Sciences,  PR.  China,  data:  CHINA.  XINJIAG 
AUTONOMOUS  REGION,  BAICHENG  Co.:  81.8°E,  4I.8°N,  1280  m,  12  Sep.  2002.  on  Tamarix 


264 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


chinensis,  by  Liyun  Jiang  (No.  13864);  paratypes:  19  apterous  viviparous  females,  other  data  same  as 
holotype. 

Etymology.  The  new  species  is  named  for  the  6  large  dorsal  patches  on  dor- 
sum  of  abdomen. 


Figures  1  -7  Apterous  viviparous  females  of  Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata.  Figure  1 
Dorsal  view  of  head.  Figure  2  Antenna.  Figure  3  Ultimate  rostral  segment.  Figure  4  Dorsal 
view  of  abdomen.  Figure  5  Siphunculus.  Figure  6  Cauda.  Figure  7  Genital  plate.  Scale 
bar:  Figs.  1-3,  5-6  =  0.1  mm;  Fig.  4  =  0.2  mm. 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


265 


HiniV    ir, 


13 


12 


10 


I          r          > 


•  ,  ,'•'•>'-.:•  . 

•  '   •    : •-. .  -  •  ^ 


15 


\ 


Figures  8-17  Apterous  viviparous  females  of  Brevicorynella  sexmaculata.  Figure  8 
Dorsal  view  of  head.  Figure  9  Antenna.  Figure  10  Ultimate  rostral  segment.  Figure  11 
Dorsal  tubercles  on  pronotum.  Figure  12  Spiracle  and  spiracular  plate  on  metathorax. 
Figure  13  Spiracle  and  spiracular  plate  on  abdominal  segment.  Figure  14  Dorsal  view  of 
abdomen.  Figure  15  Siphunculus.  Figure  16  Cauda.  Figure  17  Anal  plate.  Scale  bar:  Figs. 
8-12,  15-17  =  0.1  mm;  Figs.  13,  14  =  0.2  mm. 


266 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


I  ilter 


i.O&HE 


' 


•, 


\        I 


ii  in  .. 


Figures  18-28  Apterous  viviparous  females  of  Brevicorynella  quadrimaculata.  Figure 
18  Dorsal  view  of  body.  Figure  19  Dorsal  view  of  abdomen.  Figure  20  Dorsal  view  of 
head  and  pronotum,  showing  tubercles  on  pronotum.  Figure  21  Antenna.  Figure  22 
Ultimate  rostral  segment.  Figure  23  Spiracle  and  spiracular  plate  on  metathorax.  Figure 
24  Cauda.  Figure  25  Anal  plate.  Figure  26  Genital  plate.  Figure  27  Spiracle  and  spirac- 
ular plate  on  abdominal  segment.  Figure  28  Siphunculus. 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


267 


•  ,$, ' 


' 


31 


29 

i  90m 


ii 


IS 


•I.  >•:•= 


.., 


Figures  29-39  Apterous  viviparous  females  of  Brevicorynella  sexmaculata.  Figure  29 
Dorsal  view  of  body.  Figure  30.  Dorsal  view  of  abdomen.  Figure  31  Dorsal  view  of  head 
and  pronotum,  showing  tubercles  on  pronotum.  Figure  32  Antenna.  Figure  33  Ultimate 
rostral  segment.  Figure  34  Spiracle  and  spiracular  plate  on  metathorax.  Figure  35  Cauda. 
Figure  36  Anal  plate.  Figure  37  Genital  plate.  Figure  38  Spiracle  and  spiracular  plate  on 
abdominal  segment.  Figure  39  Siphunculus. 


268 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


-H 

.2    -= 

T^- 

•t 

T^- 

^J- 

^~ 

-t 

rn 

NO 

-§    |, 

03        C 

2 

rn 

— 

ri 

!_! 

O 

o 

U     u 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

~3 

+1 

o    -£ 

P/~J 

CO 

f"! 

co 

ro 

-t 

ro 

ON 

C 

o 

o 

o 

o 

ON 

ri 

o 

O 

O 

_*        £ 

^^ 

.  —  i 

I-H 

O 

!-H 

0 

—  -         "  j 

CD 

o 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

c/5 

C/3          C/3 

+1 

«      "03 
c/3        r" 

o    .5 

NO 

O 

o 

Ol 
O 

O 

C4 

O 

ts 

s 

1 

O 

rj 

O 

O 

0       C 
P       C 

o 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

O 

CD 

£    S 

-H 

"o    ^ 

-1- 

ri 

rn 

2 

M 

O 

rn 

oo 

NO 

O 

u 

~^ 

^— 

—  < 

7-~ 

^^ 

1  —  1 

»-H 

l-H 

O 

t/3         *J 

03        c 

CD 

CD 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD        03 

+1 

ON 

•^j- 

oo 

ON 

rn 

T^- 

<* 

O 

,  —  i 

rn 

ri 

I-H 

rn 

I-H 

rn 

^)- 

rn 

I-H 

C      > 

—  ' 

— 

'  —  ' 

— 

—  ' 

— 

— 

— 

O 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

-H 

-t- 

*^j- 

rn 

in 

oo 

ON 

T^- 

I-H 

-t- 

^_: 

ri 

O 

in 

n 

T^J- 

rn 

. 

c   >• 

•  — 

•  —  > 

'  —  i 

•  —  i 

'  —  1 

•  —  ' 

•  1 

•  —  1 

p 

1 

< 

CD 

O 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

CD 

3 

-H 

Q 

T^- 

Tf 

ON 

•^j- 

Tj- 

TJ- 

ON 

O 

"3 

c    !"""! 

2 

2 

!-! 

Tf 

2 

<~J 

2 

rn 

a 

<! 

CD 

CD 

CD 

O 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

.5 

"5 

-H 

QI 

£  t 

R     c 

H—  '        <U 

O 
CD 

O 
CD 

O 
O 

o 

o 

ON 
O 

O 

rn 

ON 
0 
O 

rn 

o 

o 

o 

o 

CD 

O 

O 

o 

r. 

-a 

-H 

o 

C       w 

>/"i 

^1- 

^~ 

^j- 

Tf 

in 

Tj- 

NO 

ON 

"?     ^ 

v~i 

'r- 

'  '           t/1 

I.H 

r—( 

.  —  I 

,  —  i 

i_^ 

,  —  , 

^H 

O 

1 

"S  s 

CD 

CD 

CD 

0 

0 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

-H 

<D 

"2    ra 

p; 

ri 

ri 

in 

— 

NO 

rn 

r- 

NO 

m 

ON 

03 

•  =    IB 

in 

in 

in 

O 

| 

I    '*- 

CD 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

o 

CD 

•3 

2 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

-H 
O 

00 

a 

T3        3 

NO 

m 

•<J- 

rn 

O 

.£• 

.2        p 

rn 

rn 

rn 

rn 

rn 

rn 

rn 

rn 

O 

.C 

X     ^ 

CD 

CD 

0 

O 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

c/5 

^ 

-H 

t_, 

^     _  r-; 

O 

0 

i/-j 

>J~1 

•n 

ly-j 

ir-j 

ON 

NO 

•§   « 

0 

OO 

fS 

oo 

OO 

oo 

ri 

[^ 

OO 
t— 

rn 

0 

cd 

CQ      ^ 

CD 

CD 

CD 

CD 

0 

O 

CD 

CD 

CD 

O 

C/3 

"in 

-H 

1> 

l>~i       "^ 

o 

i/-j 

O 

l/~) 

o 

O 

O 

rn 

ON 

g 

•a    So 

o     c 

O 

r) 
CN 

O 
rn 

ri 

V} 

cs 

o 

ri 

ri 

O 

b 

CQ     JL> 

—  ' 

— 

—  ' 

—  ; 

—  : 

—  ' 

—  1 

—  ; 

CD 

c/3 

03 

1) 

^ 

-H 

(U 

00 

jy 

03 

S 

U 

•o 

O 

— 

r) 

m 

•* 

ir, 

NO 

f- 

% 

— 

Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


269 


-H 

w    _c 

•<*•        *t 

i/"i 

-r 

ly") 

i/^ 

o 

i/^ 

•3- 

I/-, 

oc 

"O         ^""* 

</"»           ~T 

i/~( 

-r 

U". 

i/~( 

^c 

NO 

Tf 

^3 

Wt 

^^ 

3        =0 

«      c 

O    .£ 

d        d 

d 

d 

d 

""^ 

'  —  ' 

d 

d 

^^ 

'  —  ' 

^^ 

"3 

-H 

o     -S 

l/"j               —^- 

-t- 

l/", 

'/"i 

'/-; 

l/~, 

'/"j 

in 

1^1 

oc 

NO 

^o        -t 

•rf 

[Q 

!£j 

NC 

N£ 

NO 

1C' 

^£ 

1-  - 

d        d 

~ 

d 

d 

d 

o 

6 

d 

d 

d 

o 

c/5 

t«         U5 

-H 

3     — 

01             01 

01 

NO 

NO 

NO 

Ol 

01 

NO 

01 

NO 

CO 

%     .1 

^"             lo 

0          0 

O 

S 

g 

3 

S 

S 

o 

o' 

3 

g 

<->       C 

O       H 

d        o' 

d 

o 

d 

o 

d 

d 

d 

d 

o 

d 

u       H 

-H 

'•*—      — 

-t       -r 

T^- 

o> 

^~ 

—  j- 

-t 

ON 

-t 

0s 

,  — 

i/-( 

"> 

~-f 

r^4- 

r*"} 

-i- 

-r 

~^- 

^^ 

1>       ' 

_       __ 

,_| 

.  1 

^_ 

_ 

_ 

,  — 

^ 

en      .»_. 
&       C 

d        d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

o 

o 

d 

o 

CO      c3 

-H 

i/"i        */"* 

i/^ 

o 

i/-j 

^ 

</~} 

i/~t 

l/~j 

I/-, 

[-- 

,.H 

^J 

S      !^J 

J^ 

2 

oc 

t-- 

ir. 

NO 

oc 

NO 

^ 

<  : 

f^      f^ 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

O 

d 

d 

d 

o 

•\\ 

l/">              ITj 

i/^j 

o 

i/-, 

i/~j 

</~t 

*/"» 

T^- 

*/"j 

oc 

-r 

• 

r~-         vc 

NO 

NO 

i/-j 

r- 

oo 

r- 

T^- 

oc 

NO 

c    > 

— 

— 

— 

— 

•-H 

— 

o 

^ 

d        d 

C' 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

o 

f 

g 

-H 

s^^ 

NC                 •/"* 

^C 

V} 

iy-( 

m 

NO 

NO 

o 

NO 

O 

0- 

pw                                    —  J         __ 

ON                OC 

QN 

r^ 

OC 

oo 

ON 

O 

oo 

ON 

ON 

o 

-fcS                                     —         — 

__                _ 

— 

f~i 

^H 

«— 

01 

_ 

p 

-S               <    ~ 

d               O 

d 

d 

o' 

d 

—; 

—  ' 

.—  ' 

d 

3 

S 

1 

-H 

oo    t: 

^                                r£         SO 

r*~l           r*~i 

C:          O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

d 

d 

ON 

0s 

O 

o 

C 

.2                3    J3 

d        d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

u 

C-                •« 

-H 

C                          C       -yi 

>/"i        >/"j 

*/~j 

i/-( 

i/~j 

i/-j 

m 

i/~i 

'/"; 

ly-, 

•3- 

•S           '-£    % 

>/~i        i/~j 

sC 

"/~» 

sC 

\c 

NC 

NC 

<f~l 

sC 

NO 

o 

1                 c    2 

d        d 

•^2 

d 

d 

d 

d 

C"^ 

f^l 

^^ 

^^ 

*^^ 

atj                 <~< 

o 

-H 

(L>                                   -r^ 

o 

0 

o 

0 

__ 

_ 

r_« 

ON 

I-H 

oo 

—                      e      2 

oc 

oo 

oo 

I.H 

Ol 

OJ 

01 

ON 

f-  1 

S                  •=    Ic 

1                    ^      - 

d        d 

o 

d 

NC 

d 

d 

(—  - 

d 

d 

NC 

d 

d 

p 

,-U 

D 

£               -    h 

01              — 

Ol 

01 

,  

Ol 

Ol 

01 

,  

01 

oc 

01 

=3                          12        = 

0  1           ON 

O 

*«H 

ON 

01 

O 

Ol 

ON 

Ol 

O 

— 

.£•              •=     E 

^           r<1 

-t 

•t 

rn 

—  t" 

-t 

"t 

f^i 

-f 

-f 

o 

|               =    -5 

d        d 

° 

° 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

= 

d 

° 

3 

-H 

*^>    *"" 

"/"*          O 

i/^ 

I/", 

V~l 

o 

o 

o 

•/~t 

0 

2 

^>               -^    I-* 

r~ 

r^ 

(^ 

t^ 

o 

o 

o 

Ol 

O 

NO 

"S                          O     .— 

^^            O** 

t^ 

ON 

OC 

ON 

ON 

01 

O 

— 

s                     DQ      £ 

o        d 

d 

O 

d 

d 

d 

— 

— 

— 

d 

O 

"o 

r- 

-H 

o                 >^  -5 

o        o 

~ 

</~* 

i/", 

•/") 

o 

1/-J 

i/-, 

-  —  • 

» 

C                        -0      S) 

1          a?  S 

O           •/"* 

'^j 

01 

01 

r-~ 
-r 

5 

o 

ON| 

NO 

O 

-r 

00 

-t- 

ON 
O 

3                                  — 

CO 

C3 

D 

* 

-H 

Ol 

u 

00 

o 

g 

3                         • 

u 

-3 

t-                       Z 

—           r  i 

m 

-T 

'/'i 

^C 

""* 

OO 

ON 

™ 

< 



270  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  project  is  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Sciences  Foundation  of  China  (Grant  No. 
30270171,  No.  30170127),  and  National  Science  Fund  for  Fostering  Talents  in  Basic  Research  (No. 
NSFC-J0030092). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Blackmail,  R.  L.  and  V.  F.  Eastop.  1994.  Aphids  on  the  world's  trees.  An  identification  and  infor- 
mation guide.  University  Press,  Cambridge,  England.  Center  for  Agriculture  and  Biosciences 
International  VIII:  1024pp. 

Nevsky,  V.  P.  1929.  Aphids  of  Central  Asia.  Uzbekistan  Plant  Protect  Experiment  Station,  16:  425 
pp. 

Pashtshenko,  N.  F.  1988.  Suborder  Aphidinea,  aphids:  pp.  546-686.  In,  Lehr  P.  A.  (Editor)  Keys  to 
insects  of  the  Far  East  of  USSR.  Volume  2  "Nauka."  Leningrad,  Soviet  Union.  972  pp. 

Remaudiere,  G.  and  M.  Remaudiere.  1997.  Catalogue  of  the  world's  Aphididae.  Homoptera: 
Aphidoidea.  Paris,  France.  Institut  Natural  de  la  Recherche  Agronomique.  473  pp. 


Vol.  114.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 271 

NOTES  ON  DOLICHOPUS,  ALLOHERCOSTOMUS,  AND 
PHALACROSOMA  FROM  NEPAL 
(DIPTERA:  DOLICHOPODIDAE)1 

Ding  Yang!,  Toyohei  Saigusa1,  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga4 

ABSTRACT:  One  species  is  described  as  new  to  science:  Dolichopus  nepalensis  sp.  nov.  Two 
species  are  recorded  from  Nepal  for  the  first  time:  Allohercostomus  rotwidatus  (Yang  and  Saigusa, 
1999),  Phalacrosoma  amoenum  Becker,  1922. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Dolichopodidae,  Dolichopus,  Allohercostomus.  Phalacrosoma,  new  species, 
Nepal. 

The  fauna  of  Dolichopodidae  from  Nepal  is  not  well  known.  The  major  stud- 
ies on  Dolichopodidae  from  Nepal  were  made  by  Hollis  (1964)  and  Yang, 
Saigusa  and  Masunaga  (2001,  2002,  2003).  In  the  present  paper,  the  following 
three  genera  and  five  species  of  the  subfamily  Dolichopodinae  from  Nepal  are 
listed:  Dolichopus  (two  species),  Allohercostomus  (two  species),  and  Phalacro- 
soma (one  species).  One  species  is  described  as  new  to  science,  Dolichopus 
nepalensis,  and  two  species  are  recorded  from  Nepal  for  the  first  time. 

The  types  of  the  new  species  are  deposited  in  the  Biosystematics  Laboratory 
of  Kyushu  University,  Fukuoka,  Japan.  The  following  abbreviations  are  used: 
acr-acrostichal,  ad-anterodorsal,  apv-apicoventral,  av-anteroventral,  d-dorsal, 
dc-dorsocentral,  Li-fore  leg,  LH-mid  leg,  LUI-hind  leg,  npl-notopleural,  pd-pos- 
terodorsal,  pv-posteroventral,  v-ventral. 

Genus  Dolichopus  Latreille,  1796 

The  species  of  the  genus  Dolichopus  from  the  Oriental  region  were  reviewed 
by  Olejnicek  (2002).  One  species  was  known  from  Nepal:  Dolichopus  exsul  Al- 
drich,  1922  (Hollis,  1964;  Dyte,  1975).  Here  one  new  species  is  added  to  the 
fauna  of  Nepal. 

Dolichopus  exsul  Aldrich,  1922 

Dolichopus  exsul  Aldrich,  1922.  Proc.  U.S.  National  Museum  61(25):  15.  Type 
locality:  Hawaii. 

Distribution:  Nepal,  India,  China  (Jiangsu,  Taiwan),  Hawaii. 
Remarks:  Hollis  (1964)  recorded  this  species  from  Nepal. 


1  Received  on  March  13,  2004.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

•  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Haidian,  Beijing  100094,  China.  E-mail: 
dingyangto  cau.edu.cn  or  dyangcauf«  yahoo.com.cn. 

'  7-1-402,  Baikoen  2-Chomc,  Fukuoka,  810-0035  Japan.  E-mail:  toyohci.saigusa  u  mu2.seikyou.ne.jp. 

4  Lake  Biwa  Museum.   1091  Oroshimo-cho,  Kusatsu-shi.  Shiga,  525-0001  Japan.  E-mail:  moai;</ 
lhm.go.jp. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


272 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figs.  1-3.  Dolichopus  nepalensis,  n.  sp.  (male).  1,  Antenna  (excluding  scape),  lateral 
view;  2,  genitalia,  lateral  view;  3,  apical  genital  processes,  lateral  view.  Scale  0.25  mm. 


Dolichopus  nepalensis  Yang,  Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-3) 

Diagnosis:  Antenna  wholly  black;  first  flagellomere  as  long  as  wide.  All 
coxae  (except  narrow  apex)  black.  Hypandrium  hook-like  apically. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  4.5-4.9  mm,  wing  length  4.7-5.1  mm. 

Head  metallic  green  with  gray  brown  pollen;  lower  occiput  with  pale  gray  pollen;  frons  subshiny 
with  thin  pollen;  face  distinctly  wider  than  first  flagellomere,  with  dense  brownish  yellow  pollen, 
clypeus  with  dense  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head  black;  middle  and  lower  postocular 
bristles  (including  ventral  hairs)  pale.  Antenna  wholly  black;  first  flagellomere  rather  small,  as  long 
as  wide,  obtuse  apically;  arista  subapical,  black,  with  very  short  hairs,  with  basal  segment  0.6  times 
as  long  as  apical  segment.  Proboscis  dark  brown  with  black  hairs;  palpus  brownish  yellow,  with  black 
hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen;  mesonotum  (except  notopleural  area)  and  scutellum 
subshiny  with  gray  brown  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  thorax  black;  6  strong  dc  (5th  pair  of  dc  slight- 
ly convergent),  8-9  irregularly  paired  acr  short  and  hair-like;  scutellum  with  pale  discal  and  margin- 
al hairs.  Propleuron  pale  haired,  with  I  black  bristle  on  lower  portion.  Pteropleuron  with  group  of 
pale  hairs  in  front  of  metaspiracle;  metapleuron  with  some  pale  hairs  on  antero-lower  corner.  Legs 
yellow;  all  coxae  (except  narrow  apex)  black;  fore  and  mid  tarsi  from  tip  of  basotarsomere  onward 
black,  apex  of  hind  tibia  and  entire  hind  tarsus  black.  Hind  tibia  slightly  thickened  apically.  Hairs  and 
bristles  on  legs  black,  coxae  with  some  pale  hairs  basally;  fore  coxa  with  5-6  bristles,  mid  and  hind 
coxae  each  with  1  outer  bristle;  mid  and  hind  femora  with  1  preapical  bristle.  Fore  tibia  with  3ad,  2 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  273 


pd  and  2  pv,  apically  with  1  bristles  and  1  short  apv  (slightly  longer  than  tibia  thickness);  mid  tibia 
with  4  ad,  2  pd  and  1  av,  apically  with  5  bristles;  hind  tibia  with  5  ad,  3  pd  and  3  av,  apically  with  3 
bristles.  Tarsomere  5  slightly  thickened  with  distinct  dorsal  and  lateral  hairs.  Hind  basotarsomere 
with  2  ad  and  4-5  v.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  2.8  :  1.4  :  0.6  :  0.5  :  0.3  :  0.45;  L1I 
3.9:2.0:  1.1  :  0.9  :  0.6  :  0.5;  LIII  4.2  :  1.85  :  1.85  :  1.3  :  0.85  :  0.6.  Wing  nearly  hyaline;  veins  dark 
brown,  costal  callus  punctifonn,  M  with  a  weak  Z-bend  but  without  rudimentary  M2;  CuAx  ratio 
0.65.  Calyptera  yellow  with  black  hairs.  Halter  yellow  with  brown  base. 

Abdomen  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen;  cercus  yellow  with  black  margin.  Hairs  and  bris- 
tles on  abdomen  black.  Male  genitalia  (Figs.  2-3):  Epandrium  distinctly  longer  than  wide,  with  rather 
wide  outer  lateral  lobe  bearing  2  short  spine-like  apical  bristles,  and  narrow  inner  lateral  lobe  finger- 
like;  cercus  nearly  quadrate  with  distinct  marginal  denticles;  hypandrium  hook-like  apically. 

Female.  Body  length  4.8-5.3  mm,  wing  length  5.0-5.3  mm.  Similar  to  male,  but  face  distinctly 
wider  than  first  flagellomere. 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male.  Nepal,  Topke  Gola  (3700  m),  1972.  VII.  8, 
J.  Emoto,  deposited  in  the  Biosystematics  Laboratory  of  Kyushu  University, 
Fukuoka,  Japan.  Paratypes,  4  males,  3  females,  same  data  and  repository  as  holo- 
type. 

Distribution:  Nepal. 

Etymology:  The  specific  epithet  refers  to  the  type  locality  Nepal. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  similar  to  Dolichopus  ancistrus  Yang  from  Yun- 
nan, China,  in  having  the  black  antenna  and  hypandrium  hook-like  apically,  but 
may  be  separated  from  the  latter  by  the  black  fore  coxa  and  hind  femur  without 
long  ventral  bristles.  In  ancistrus,  the  fore  coxa  is  yellow,  and  the  hind  femur  has 
long  black  ventral  bristles  (Yang,  1997). 

Genus  Allohercostomus  Yang,  Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  2001 

One  species  was  known  from  Nepal:  Allohercostomus  nepalensis  Yang, 
Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  2001.  Here  1  new  record  species  from  Nepal  is  reported: 
Allohercostomus  rotundatus  (Yang  and  Saigusa,  1999). 

Allohercostomus  rotundatus  (Yang  and  Saigusa,  1999) 

Hercostomus  (Hereostomus)  rotundatus  Yang  and  Saigusa,  1999.  Bull.  Inst.  R.  Sci.  Nat.  Belg.  Ent. 

69:  244.  Type  locality:  Sichuan  (Emei  Mountain). 

Specimens  Examined:  4  males,  NEPAL:  Handurung  (800  m)  -  Linba  (1200  m),  1972.  VI.  27, 
H.  Makihara;  3  males,  1  female,  Nepal:  Jilikinpthi  (1850  in)  -  Pontak  (1800  m),  1972.  V.  13.  11. 
Shima;  1  male,  Nepal:  Chiliwa  (1350  m)  -  Shibku  (2100  m),  1972.  VI.  7,  J.  Emoto;  9  males,  3 
females,  Nepal:  Lelcp  (1770  m),  1972.  VI.  4,  J.  Emoto. 

Distribution:  Nepal,  China  (Sichuan,  Shaanxi). 

Allohercostomus  nepalensis  Yang,  Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  2001 

Allohercostomus  nepalensis  Yang,  Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  2001.  Ent.  Sci.  4(2):  182.  Type  locality: 
Nepal  (Topke  Gola). 

Distribution:  Nepal. 

Genus  Phalacrosoma  Becker,  1922 

The  genus  Phalacrosoma  is  recorded  from  Nepal  for  the  first  time  with  1 
species:  Phalacrosoma  amoenum  Becker,  1922. 


274  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Phalacrosoma  amoenum  Becker,  1922 

Phalacrosoma  amoenum  Becker,  1922.  Capita  Zool.  1(4):  45.  Type  locality:  Taiwan  (Kosempo). 

Specimens  Examined:  2  males,  3  females,  Nepal:  Thudam  (3500-3800  m),  1972.  VI.  16,  H. 
Shima;  1  male,  Nepal:  Lelep  (1770  m),  1972.  VI.  2,  Y.  Nishida;  1  male,  Nepal:  Chiliwa  (1350  m), 
1972.  VI.  7,  J.  Emoto;  5  males,  3  females,  NEPAL:  Basantapur  (2300  m),  1972.  V.  29,  H.  Shima;  5 
males,  1  female,  Nepal:  Dobham  (800  m),  1972.  V.  20,  H.  Shima;  2  males,  6  females,  Nepal:  Jili- 
kinpthi  (1850  m),  1972.  V.  13,  H.  Shima. 

Distribution:  Nepal,  China  (Taiwan). 

DISCUSSION 

The  genus  Dolichopus  has  two  species  in  Nepal,  of  which  the  known  species 
is  distributed  also  in  Central  China  and  South  China;  the  new  species  is  close  to 
the  species  from  South  West  China.  The  genus  Allohercostomus  has  two  species 
in  Nepal,  of  which  one  species  is  endemic  and  the  other  is  distributed  also  in 
Central  China.  The  genus  Phalacrosoma  has  only  one  species  in  Nepal  which  is 
distributed  also  in  Taiwan  of  South  China.  The  genus  Hercostomus  has  25  spec- 
ies in  Nepal  (Yang,  Saigusa  and  Masunaga,  2002),  of  which  18  are  endemic  but 
the  other  7  species  are  distributed  also  in  Central  China  and  South  West  China. 
Obviously,  the  fauna  of  the  subfamily  Dolichopodinae  from  Nepal  has  the  close 
relationship  with  that  of  Central  China,  South  West  China,  and  South  China. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Author  DY  is  grateful  to  Professor  H.  Shima,  Professor  0.  Yata  and  Associate  Professor  K.  Araya 
(Kyushu  University,  Fukuoka,  Japan),  Dr.  H.  Ulrich  (Bonn,  Germany),  and  Dr.  P.  Grootaert  (Institut 
Royal  des  Science  Naturelles,  Brussels,  Belgium)  for  their  kind  help.  This  research  was  partially  sup- 
ported by  the  Japan  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Science  under  Postdoctoral  Fellowships  for  Foreign 
Researchers  and  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Becker,  T.  1922.  Dipterologische  Studien,  Dolichopodidae  der  indo-australischen  Region.  Capita 
Zoologica  1(4):  1-247. 

Dyte,  D.  E.  1975.  Family  Dolichopodidae,  pp.  212-258.  In,  Delfinado,  M.  D.  and  D.  E.  Hardy 
(Editors).  A  catalog  of  the  Diptera  of  the  Oriental  region.  Volume  2.  The  University  Press  of 
Hawaii,  Honolulu.  459  pp. 

1 1  <>l  Ms.  D.  1964.  On  the  Diptera  of  Nepal  (Stratiomyidae,  Therevidae  and  Dolichopodidae).  Bulletin 
of  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History)  Entomology  15(4):83-1 16. 

Olejnicek,  J.  2002.  Dolichopus  howjingleei  sp.  n.  (Diptera,  Dolichopodidae)  from  Taiwan  with  a 
key  to  the  Oriental  Dolichopus.  Biologia  57(2):  147-15 1 . 

Vang,  D.  1997.  The  genus  Dolichopus  from  Southwest  China  (Diptera.  Dolichopodidae).  Bulletin 
de  Tlnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  66:79-83. 

Yang,  D.,  T.  Saigusa,  and  K.  Masunaga.  2001.  Two  new  genera  and  four  new  species  of 
Dolichopodinae  from  China  and  Nepal  (Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Entomological 
Science  4(2):  175-184. 

Yang,  D.,  T.  Saigusa,  and  K.  Masunaga.  2002.  A  review  of  the  genus  HcrcoMoiuus  from  Nepal 
(Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Bulletin  de  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de 
Belgique,  Entomologie  72:  221-243. 

Yang,  D.,  T.  Saigusa,  and  K.  Masunaga.  2003.  A  review  of  the  genus  Ncitrigaiiellu  from  Nepal 
(Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Annales  Zoologici  53(4):  663-665. 


Vol.  114.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 275 

A  NEW  SPECIES  OF  NEPALOMYIA  FROM  INDONESIA 
(DIPTERA:  DOLICHOPODIDAE)1 

Ding  Yang:,  Toyohci  Saigusa',  and  Ka/uhiro  Masunaga4 

ABSTRACT:  Nepalomyia  haliensis,  sp.  nov.  from  Indonesia  is  described  as  new  to  science  which 
represents  the  southernmost  distribution  range  of  the  genus  in  Asia.  Diagnostic  features  are  dis- 
cussed. Due  to  the  recent  synonymy  of  Newigonella  with  Nepalomyia.  the  following  new  combina- 
tions are  proposed:  Nepalomyia  nepalensis  (Yang,  Saigusa  and  Manusuga,  2003)  comb.  nov.  and 
Nepalomvia  nigra  (Yang,  Saigusa  and  Manusuga,  2003)  comb.  nov. 

KEY  WORDS:  Diptera,  Dolichopodidae,  Nepalomyia,  new  species,  Indonesia. 

The  peloropeodine  genus  Neugrigonella  Robinson,  1964  has  recently  been 
synonymized  with  Nepalomyia  Hollis,  1964  by  Runyon  and  Hurley  (2003).  It  is 
characterized  by  an  arista  arising  from  the  apical  concavity  of  the  first  flagel- 
lomere  and  a  first  tarsomere  of  leg  III  with  one  basal  spur  on  the  inner  surface 
directed  upward.  Nepalomyia  is  represented  by  4  species  in  the  Nearctic  Region 
(Runyon  and  Hurley,  2003)  and  1  species  in  the  Far  East  of  Russia  (Palaearctic: 
Negrobov,  1991).  Until  the  mid-1970s,  no  species  have  been  recorded  from  the 
Oriental  Region  before  (Dyte,  1975).  Recently  20  species  were  reported  from 
China  by  Yang  and  Saigusa  (200 la,  b),  and  4  species  from  Nepal  by  Yang, 
Saigusa  and  Masunaga  (2003).  In  this  paper,  one  species  of  Nepalomyia  is  des- 
cribed from  Indonesia  for  the  first  time  which  represents  the  southernmost  dis- 
tribution range  of  the  genus  in  Asia. 

The  following  abbreviations  are  used:  acr-acrostichal,  ad-anterodorsal,  ap-api- 
cal,  dc-dorsocentral,  Li-fore  leg,  Lll-mid  leg,  LUI-hind  leg,  MSSC-male  sec- 
ondary sexual  character,  oc-ocellar,  pd-posterodorsal,  v-ventral. 


Nepalomyia  baliemis,  NEW  SPECIES 

(Figs.  1-3) 

Diagnosis:  Belonging  to  N.  henanemis  species  group.  First  flagellomere  near- 
ly trapezoidal,  0.9  times  as  long  as  wide,  with  weak  lower  apical  corner.  Coxae 
dark  brown.  Male  fore  tarsomeres  1-3  with  one  row  of  long  posterior  hairs 
(MSSC).  Male  cercus  without  distinct  basal  tubercle. 

Description:  Male:  Body  length  2.6-2.7  mm,  wing  length  3.1-3.3  mm. 


'  Received  on  March  4,  2004.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

?  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University.  I  laidian.  Beijing  100094,  China.  E-mail: 
dingyangfa  cau.edu.cn  or  dyangcaufayahoo.com.cn. 

7-1-402,  Baikoen  2-Chome,  Fukuoka,  810-0035  Japan;  Email:  toyohei.saigusa(«  ma2.seikyou.ne.j. 

4  Lake  Biwa  Museum,  1091  Oroshimo-cho,  Kusatsu-shi.  Shiga,  525-0001  Japan;  Email:  moai(« 
lbm.go.jp. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


276 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Head  dark  metallic  green  with  gray  brown  pollen;  face  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles 
on  head  black;  postocular  bristles  (including  ventral  hairs)  black.  Ocellar  tubercle  weakly  raised,  with 
2  strong  oc  and  2  short  posterior  hairs.  Antenna  (Fig.  1 )  black;  first  flagellomere  nearly  trapezoidal, 
0.9  times  as  long  as  wide,  with  weak  lower  apical  corner;  arista  black,  long,  with  rather  short  basal 
segment.  Proboscis  black  with  black  hairs;  palpus  black  with  black  hairs  and  1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  dark  metallic  green  with  gray  brown  pollen;  pleuron  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Hairs  and  bris- 
tles on  thorax  black;  5  strong  dc,  6  irregularly  paired  acr;  scutellum  with  2  pairs  of  bristles,  outer  pair 
weak  and  nearly  1/4  as  long  as  inner  pair.  Propleuron  with  2  black  hairs  and  1  black  bristle  on  lower 
portion.  Legs  brownish  yellow;  coxae  dark  brown;  tarsi  brown  to  dark  brown  from  tip  of  tarsomere  1 
onward.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black;  coxa  I  with  5-6  bristles,  coxa  II  with  1  anterior  bristle,  coxa 
III  with  1  outer  bristle.  Femora  II  and  III  with  1  preapical  ad.  Tibia  I  apically  with  2  bristles;  tibia  II 
with  2  ad,  2  pd  and  1  v,  apically  with  4  bristles;  tibia  III  with  2  ad  and  3  pd,  apically  with  3  bristles. 
First  three  tarsomeres  of  leg  I  with  one  row  of  long  posterior  hairs  (MSSC).  First  tarsomere  of  leg  III 
with  1  v  at  base.  Relative  lengths  of  tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  1.8  :  1.2  :  0.5  :  0.5:  0.35  :  0.35;  LII  2.6 
:  1.5  :  0.9  :  0.8  :  0.5  :  0.3;  LIII  3.1  :  0.65  :  1.2  :  0.9  :  0.6  :  0.3.  Wing  hyaline;  veins  dark  brown,  basal 
costal  section  before  h  slightly  thickened,  R4+5  and  M  parallel  apically;  CuAx  ratio  0.35.  Squama 
dark  yellow  with  dark  brown  margin,  with  black  hairs.  Halter  yellow  with  dark  brown  knob. 

Abdomen  dark  brown  with  gray  brown  pollen.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  abdomen  black;  tergites  1  -5 
each  with  one  row  of  posterior  bristles. 

Male  genitalia  (Figs.  2-3):  Surstylus  on  epandrium  with  thick  dorsal  lobe  nearly  straight,  and  thin 
ventral  lobe  weak  curved  (which  bears  1  long  thin  process  at  base);  cercus  basally  with  6-7  short 
hairs,  but  without  distinct  tubercle;  hypandrium  deeply  incised  into  two  lateral  portions  nearly  trian- 
gular; aedeagus  nearly  straight  and  distinctly  swollen  apically,  with  mid-ventral  process  large  and 
rounded  apically. 

Female:  Body  length  2.6-3.0  mm,  wing  length  3.0-3.3  mm. 

Type  Data:  Holotype,  male,  Indonesia,  Bali  Is.,  Botanical  Garden  (1300  m),  4.  x.  2000,  T.  Tachi 
(deposited  in  the  collection  of  the  Biosystematics  Laboratory  of  Kyushu  University,  Fukuoka).  Para- 
types:  13  males  30  females,  same  data  and  depository  as  holotype. 

Etymology:  The  name  refers  to  the  type  locality  Bali. 


Figs.  1-3.  Nepalomyia  baliensis,  n.  sp.  (male).  1,  Antenna  (excluding  scape  and  pedicel); 
2,  hypandrium  and  aedeagus,  ventral  view;  3.  hypopygium,  lateral  view.  Scale  0.25  mm. 


Vol.  114.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 277 

DISCUSSION 

The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  Nepalomyia  pallipilosa  (Yang  and 
Saigusa)  from  Yunnan  in  the  shape  of  aedeagus,  but  may  be  separated  from  the 
latter  by  a  longer  first  flagellomere  (vs.  0.6  as  long  as  wide  in  pallipilosa),  R4+5 
and  M  being  parallel  at  wing  apex  (vs.  convergent  at  wing  apex),  and  tarsus  I 
brown  to  dark  brown  from  tip  of  tarsomere  1  onward  (vs.  tarsus  I  partly  white) 
(Yang  and  Saigusa,  200  Ib). 

Due  to  the  synonymization  of  Neurigonella  Robinson,  1964  with  Nepalomyia 
Hollis,  the  recently  described  species  are  proposed  as  new  combinations:  Nepal- 
omyia nepalensis  (Yang,  Saigusa  and  Manusuga,  2003)  comb.  nov.  and  Nepalo- 
myia nigra  (Yang,  Saigusa  and  Manusuga,  2003)  comb.  nov. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  very  grateful  to  Dr.  T.  Tachi  (Kyushu  University,  Fukuoka)  for  collecting  the  specimens. 
The  first  author  wishes  to  express  sincere  thanks  to  Prof.  H.  Shima,  Prof.  0.  Yata,  Assoc.  Prof.  K. 
Araya  (Kyushu  University,  Fukuoka),  Dr.  H.  Ulrich  (Bonn),  and  Dr.  P.  Grootaert  (Institut  Royal  des 
Science  Naturelles,  Brussels)  for  their  kind  help  in  many  ways.  The  research  was  partially  supported 
by  the  Japan  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Science  under  Postdoctoral  Fellowships  for  Foreign 
Researchers  and  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of  China  (No.  30225009). 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Dyte,  D.  E.  1975.  Family  Dolichopodidae,  pp.  212-258.  In,  Delfinado,  M.  D.  and  D.  E.  Hardy  (Edi- 
tors). A  catalog  of  the  Diptera  of  the  Oriental  region,  Volume  2.  The  University  Press  of  Hawaii, 
Honolulu.  459  pp. 

Hollis,  D.  1964.  On  the  Diptera  of  Nepal  (Stratiomyidae,  Therevidae  and  Dolichopodidae).  Bulletin 
of  the  British  Museum  (Natural  History)  Entomology  15(4):83-1 16. 

Negrobov,  O.  P.  1984.  The  genera  of  the  family  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera),  new  for  the  faunas  of 
Palearctic  and  USSR.  Zoologickie  Zhurnal  63: 1 1 1 1-1 1 1 5. 

Negrobov,  O.  P.  1991.  Family  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  11-139.  //;,  Soos,  A.  and  Papp,  L.  (Editors). 
Catalogue  of  Palaearctic  Diptera,  Volume  7.  Akademiai  Kiado.  Budapest.  291  pp. 

Robinson,  H.  1964.  A  synopsis  of  the  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  of  the  southeastern  United  States 
and  adjacent  regions.  Miscellaneous  Publications  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  4: 

103-192. 

Robinson,  H.  and  J.  R.  Vockeroth.  1981.  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  625-639.  //;:  McAlpine.  .!.  F.  et  al. 
(coords.).  Manual  of  Nearctic  Diptera,  Volume  1.  Research  Branch,  Agriculture  Canada  Mono- 
graph, No.  27.  674  pp. 

Runyon,  J.  B.  and  R.  1,.  Hurley.  2003.  Revision  of  the  Nearctic  species  of  Nepalomyia  Hollis  (  = 
Neurigonella  Robinson)  (Diptera:  Dolichopodidae:  Peloropeodinae)  with  a  world  catalogue.  An- 
nals of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  96(4):403-4I4. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  200  la.  The  species  of  Neurigonella  from  China  (Diptera:  Empidoidea: 
Dolichopodidae).  Annales  de  la  Societe  entomologiquc  dc  France  (N.S.)  37:375-392. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  200  Ib.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China  (XI). 
Bulletin  dc  1'Institut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  F.ntomologie  71:237-256. 

Yang,  D.,  T.  Saigusa,  and  K.  Masunaga.  2003.  A  review  of  the  genus  Neurigonella  from  Nepal 
(Diptera:  Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Annales  Zoologici  53(4):663-665. 


MEMOIRS 


OF     THE  AMERICAN   ENTOMOLOGICAL   SOCIETY 


NEW!  #44         A  Systematic  Database  of  Thereva 
Latreille  Names:  An  Answer  to  the  Nomenclatural 
Challenge  in  Therevidae  (Insecta:  Diptera) 
by  Kevin  C.  Holston.  86  pp $25 


NEW!  #45        A  Revision  of  the  Caryedontini 
(Coleoptera:  Bruchidae:  Pachymerinae)  of  Africa  and 
the  Middle  East  by  Clarence  Dan  Johnson,  Benjamin  J. 
Southgate  and  Alex  Delobel.  120  pp $30 


#43 


A  World  Revision  of  the  Genus 


Spodoptera  Guenee  (Lepidoptera  Noctuidae) 
Michael  G.  Pogue.  2003.  202  pp $30 

A  complete  list  of  available  Memoirs  can  be  found  at 
www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes/memoirs.html 


326 


NAME 


ADDRESS 


Please  send  these  issue(s): 

D  #45  ($25)  $  . 
D  #44  ($30)  $  . 
D  #43  ($30)  $  . 

D# 


POSTAGE/ 


D# 

$ 

$ 

CITY                                                                         STATE                    ZIP 

D  # 

$ 

E-MAIL    (PLEASE  PRINT  CLEARLY) 

Postage: 
TOTAL 

$ 

TELEPHONE 

Domestic  orders: 

$3  for  the  first 
publication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

Foreign  orders: 

$5  fee  for  the  first 
publication;  $1  for 
each  additional 
publication. 

AES  Fed.  ID  No.: 


D  Check  or  money  order  (in  US  currency  through  a  US  bank) 
payable  to  The  American  Entomological  Society. 

Credit  card:     D  VISA      D  Discover     D  MasterCard     D  AmEx 


CREDIT  CARD  NUMBER 


EXPIRATION  DATE 


MAIL  FORM  &  PAYMENT  TO: 

The  American  Entomological  Society 
at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

Telephone:  (2 15)  56 1-3978 
E-mail:  aes@acnatsci.org 


NAME  ON  CARD 


SIGNATURE 


www.acnatsci.org/hosted/aes 


Vol.  114.  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 219 

NOTES  ON  THE  GENUS  CHAETOGONOPTERON  FROM 
GUANGXI,  CHINA  (DIPTERA:  DOLICHOPODIDAE)1 

I  ill  Zhang2,  Ding  Vang',  and  Kazuhiro  Masunaga4 

ABSTRACT:  The  genus  Chaetogonopteron  is  recorded  from  Guangxi  (China)  for  the  first  time  with 
six  species.  One  species  is  described  as  new  to  science:  Chaetogonopteron  gitangxiense.  A  key  to  the 
species  from  Guangxi  is  presented. 

KEY  WORDS:  Dolichopodidae,  Chaetogonopteron,  new  species,  Guangxi,  China. 

The  genus  Chaetogonopteron  de  Meijere  is  characterized  by  the  shortened 
hind  basotarsomere  (Meuffels  and  Grootaert,  1987,  1997).  The  species  of  the 
genus  Chaetogonopteron  from  China  were  mainly  studied  by  Yang  and  Grootaert 
(1999a,  b),  Yang  and  Saigusa  (2001),  and  Yang  (2002).  In  the  present  paper,  the 
genus  Chaetogonopteron  is  recorded  from  Guangxi  for  the  first  time  with  6 
species,  based  on  the  material  collected  by  the  second  author  with  sweep  net  in 
Guangxi  in  2002.  Among  them  one  species  is  described  as  new  to  science.  The 
type  of  new  species  is  deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural 
University,  Beijing.  The  following  abbreviations  are  used:  acr-acrostichal,  ad- 
anterodorsal,  av-anteroventral,  d-dorsal,  dc-dorsocentral,  h-humeral,  ih-inner 
humeral,  Li-fore  leg,  LH-mid  leg,  LUI-hind  leg,  npl-notopleural,  oc-ocellar,  pd- 
posterodorsal,  ph-posthumeral,  psa-postalar,  pv-posteroventral,  sa-supraalar,  su- 
sutural,  v-ventral. 


Key  to  species  of  Chaetogonopteron  from  Guangxi,  China 

1.  Only  hind  tarsomere  1  shortened 2 

Hind  tarsomeres  1-2  shortened 4 

2.  Acr  uniseriate 3 

Acr  biseriate;  thorax  and  abdomen  largely  yellow  

C.  chaeturum  Grootaert  and  Meuffels 

3.  First  flagellomere  short  conical,  nearly  as  long  as  wide 

C.  luteicinctum  (Parent) 

First  flagellomerere  much  elonagated C.  concavum  Yang  and  Grootaert 


1  Received  on  March  14,  2003.  Accepted  on  May  18,  2004. 

:  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Haidian,  Beijing  100044.  China.  E-mail: 
tolily@126.com. 

'  Department  of  Entomology,  China  Agricultural  University,  Haidian,  Beijing  100044,  China.  E-mail: 
dingyang@cau.edu.cn  or  dyangcau@yahoo.com.cn.  Corresponding  author. 

'Lake  Biwa  Museum.   1091  Oroshimo-cho,  Kusatsu-shi,  Shiga,  525-0001  Japan.  E-mail:  moan/ 
lbm.go.jp. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


280  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


4.  Mid  tibia  without  rowed  v 5 

Mid  tibia  with  rowed  v C.  guangxiense  sp.  n. 

5.  Fore  tarsomere  5  wholly  whitish C.  ceratophorum  Yang  and  Grootaert 

Fore  tarsomeres  2-5  whitish  with  dark  dorsal  surface  

C.  pallipilosum  Yang  and  Grootaert 

Chaetogonopteron  ceratophorum  Yang  and  Grootaert 

Chaetogonopteron  ceratophorum  Yang  and  Grootaert.   1999.  Bull.  Inst.  R.  Sci.  Nat.  Belg.  Ent. 
69:269.  Type  locality:  Yunnan  (Menglun). 

Specimens  Examined:  1 1  males,  8  females,  Guangxi:  Tiane,  Buliuhe  (300m), 
2002.  VIII.  9,  D.  Yang. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi,  Yunnan). 

Chaetogonopteron  chaeturum  Grootaert  and  Meuffels 

Chaetogonopteron  chaeturum  Grootaert  and  Meuffels.  1999.  Belg.  J.  Ent.  1(2):  335.  Type  locality: 
Thailand. 

Specimen  Examined:  1  male,  Guangxi:  Tiane,  Buliuhe  (300m),  2002.  VIII. 
9,  D.  Yang. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi,  Yunnan),  Thailand. 

Chaetogonopteron  concavum  Yang  and  Grootaert 

Chaetogonopteron  concavum  Yang  and  Grootaert,  1999.  Bull.  Inst.  R.  Sci.  Nat.  Belg.  Ent.  69:271. 
Type  locality:  Yunnan  (Menglun). 

Specimens  Examined:  2  males,  Guangxi:  Tianlin,  Langping  (1300m),  2002. 
VIII.  14,  D.  Yang. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi,  Yunnan). 

Chaetogonopteron  guangxiense  Zhang,  Yang  and  Masunaga 
NEW  SPECIES  (Figs  1-4) 

Diagnosis:  Antennal  scape  and  pedicel  black,  first  flagellomere  blackish. 
R4+5  and  M  more  or  less  parallel  apically.  Male  hind  tarsomere  2  distinctly 
longer  than  tarsomere  1 ,  with  a  large  appendage. 

Description:  Male.  Body  length  5.0  mm,  wing  length  5.3  mm. 

Head  metallic  green  with  pale  gray  pollen.  Eyes  contiguous  on  face;  face  distinctly  narrower  than 
frons.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  head  black;  postocular  bristles  black,  postero-ventral  hairs  pale.  Ocellar 
tubercle  weak,  with  2  long  oc  and  2  short  posterior  hairs.  Antennal  scape  and  pedicel  black,  first  fla- 
gellomere blackish,  subtriangular,  as  long  as  wide;  arista  subapical,  blackish,  and  short  pubescent. 
Proboscis  dark  brownish  yellow  with  black  hairs;  palpus  dark  brownish  yellow  with  black  hairs  and 
1  black  apical  bristle. 

Thorax  yellow  with  gray  pollen;  mesonotum  brilliant  metallic  green  with  anterior  and  lateral  por- 
tions yellow;  scutellum  with  a  large  metallic  green  basal  spot;  metanotum  metallic  green.  Ptero- 
pleuron  and  laterotergite  each  with  blackish  or  black  anterior  upper  corner.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  tho- 
rax black;  5  strong  dc,  6-7  irregularly  paired  acr  short  and  hair-like;  1  long  h,  I  long  ph.  1  slightly 
short  ih,  1  short  su,  1  long  anterior  and  1  slightly  short  posterior  npl,  1  short  anterior  and  1  long  pos- 
terior sa,  1  long  psa;  scutellum  with  1  pair  of  long  bristles  and  8  very  short  marginal  hairs.  Propleuron 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


with  2  black  hairs  and  1  black  bristle  on  lower  portion.  Metapleuron  with  4  black  hairs  on  postero- 
upper  corner  and  2  black  hairs  on  antero-lower  corner.  Legs  yellow;  mid  coxa  with  black  dot  on  pos- 
terior upper  corner;  tarsomere  5  brown.  Hairs  and  bristles  on  legs  black.  Fore  coxa  apically  with  6 
weak  or  strong  bristles;  mid  coxa  with  1  weak  anterior  bristle  near  apex;  hind  coxa  with  1  outer  bris- 
tle at  base.  Fore  femur  apically  with  1  pv;  mid  femur  apically  with  1  preapical  bristle,  1  weak  av  and 
1  distinct  pv;  hind  femur  with  one  row  of  8  ventral  bristles,  apically  with  1  preapical  bristle,  1  weak 
av  and  1  distinct  pv.  Fore  tibia  apically  with  2  bristles;  mid  tibia  with  2  ad,  2  pd  and  1  pv,  apically 
with  4  bristles;  hind  tibia  with  one  row  of  10  recumbent  v  (except  narrow  base  and  wide  apical  por- 
tion), apically  with  3  bristles.  Fore  basotarsomere  (except  basal  portion)  with  one  row  of  6  rather  long 
av;  tarsomeres  2-4  with  one  row  of  long  hair-like  v  curved  apically.  Hind  tarsomeres  1-2  shortened, 
tarsomere  2  distinctly  longer  than  basotarsomere,  with  a  wide  ventral  appendage.  Relative  lengths  of 
tibia  and  5  tarsomeres  LI  3.1  :  1.9  :  1.0  :  0.8  :  0.55  ;  0.45;  LII  4.8  :  2.9  :  1.5  :  1.15  :  0.6  :  0.45;  LIII 
5.2  :  0.6  :  0.95  :1.75  :  1.2  :  0.5.  Wing  hyaline;  veins  dark  brown,  R4+5  and  M  more  or  less  parallel 
apically;  CuAx  ratio  0.6.  Calyptera  dark  brown  with  black  hairs.  Halter  dark  yellow  with  brown 
knob. 

Abdomen  yellow  with  gray  pollen;  tergum  1  and  lateral  portion  of  tergum  2  brownish  yellow. 
Hairs  and  bristles  on  abdomen  black.  Male  genitalia  chiefly  yellow,  cercus  with  pale  hairs.  Male  gen- 
italia  (Fig. 4):  Sternum  8  with  2  bristles;  cpandrium  with  1  strong  bristle  on  finger-like  lateral  process; 


1 


Figs  1-4  Chaetogonopteron  guangxiense  n.  sp.  (male).  1.  Wing;  2,  antenna  (excluding 
scape),  lateral  view;  3,  hind  tarsomeres  1-2,  lateral  view;  4,  genitalia,  lateral  view. 


282  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


surstylus  with  dorsal  lobe  more  or  less  acute  apically,  and  ventral  lobe  rather  wide  apically;  cercus 
acute  apically;  hypandrium  obtuse  apically. 
Female.  Unknown. 

Holotype:  Male,  Guangxi:  Tiane,  Buliuhe  (300  m),  2002.  VIII.  9,  D.  Yang, 
deposited  in  the  insect  collection  of  China  Agricultural  University,  Beijing. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi). 

Etymology:  The  species  is  named  after  the  type  locality  Guangxi,  China. 

Remarks:  The  new  species  is  somewhat  similar  to  Chaetogonopteron 
seriatum  Yang  and  Grootaert  from  Yunnan,  but  may  be  separated  from  the  latter 
by  the  postocular  bristles  wholly  black  and  antenna  black  with  blackish  first  fla- 
gellomere.  In  minutum,  the  middle  and  lower  postocular  bristles  are  pale,  and  the 
antenna  is  yellow  with  first  flagellomere  black  (Yang  and  Grootaert,  1999b). 


Chaetogonopteron  luteicinctum  (Parent) 

Sympycnus  hiteicintus  Parent,  1926.  Encycl.  Ent.  (B  II)  Dipt.,  3:134.  Type  locality:  Shanghai  (Zi-Ka- 
Wei). 

Specimens  Examined:  5  males,  Guangxi:  Tiane,  Bojie  (1100  m),  3  August, 
2002,  leg.  D.  Yang;  16  males  12  femlaes,  Guangxi:  Tianlin,  Langping  (1300m), 
14  August,  2002,  leg.  D.  Yang. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi,  Yunnan,  Shanghai,  Zhejiang,  Fujian,  Henan). 


Chaetogonopteron  palttpttosum  Yang  and  Grootaert 

Chaetogonopteron pallipilosum  Yang  and  Grootaert,  1999.  Bull.  Inst.  R.  Sci.  Nat.  Belg.  Ent.  69:274. 
Type  locality:  Yunnan  (Jinghong,  Mengyang). 

Specimen  Examined:  1  male,  Guangxi:  Tiane,  Buliuhe  (300  m),  9  August, 
2002,  leg.  D.  Yang. 

Distribution:  China  (Guangxi,  Yunnan). 


DISCUSSION 

Guangxi,  with  a  tropical  or  subtropical  climate,  faunistically  belongs  to  South 
China  of  the  Oriental  biogeographic  realm.  Six  species  of  Chaetogonopteron  are 
now  known  to  occur  in  Guangxi.  One  species  is  endemic  to  Guangxi,  four 
species  are  distributed  also  in  South  West  China  of  Oriental  realm,  and  one 
species  is  widely  distributed  also  in  Central  China,  South  West  China  and  other 
areas  of  south  China.  It  is  obvious  that  the  specific  composition  of  Chaetogo- 
nopteron from  Guangxi  has  the  close  relationship  with  that  of  southwestern 
China. 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003  283 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  are  very  grateful  to  Dr.  H.  Ulrich  (Bonn,  Germany)  and  Dr.  P.  Grootaert  (Institut  Royal  des 
Science  Naturelles,  Brussels,  Belgium)  for  their  kind  help.  Author  DY  wishes  to  express  his  sincere 
thanks  to  Professor  Guofang  Jiang  (Nanjing  Normal  University,  Nanjing)  for  his  kind  help  during  the 
survey  to  Guangxi  in  2002.  The  research  is  supported  by  the  National  Natural  Science  Foundation  of 
China  (No.  30225009). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Grootaert,  P.  and  H.  J.  G.  Meuffels.  1999.  Description  of  Chaetogonoptemn  chaetiinim  sp.  n..  a 
very  common  dolichopdid  fly  from  South  Thailand  (Insect  Diptera  Dolichopodidae).  Belgian 
Journal  of  Entomology  1(2):  335-341. 

Meuffels,  H.  J.  G.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1987.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Papua  New  Guinea  VI: 
New  species  in  the  genus  Sympycnus  Loew,  1857.  Indo-Malayan  Zoology  4:  317-397. 

Meuffels,  H.  J.  G.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1997.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera)  from  Papua  New  Guinea 
XVI.  Scotiomyia  gen.  nov.  a  new  Sympycnine  genus  from  the  rain  forest  with  notes  on  the 
Papuan  Sympycninae.  Studia  Dipterologica  4(l):247-255. 

Parent,  O.  1926.  Dolichopodides  nouveaux  de  1'extreme  orient  palearctique.  Encyclopedic  Ento- 
mologique(B  II)  Diptera  3:1 1 1-149. 

Yang,  D.  2002.  Diptera:  Therevidae,  Dolichopodidae.  pp.  741-749.  //;, Huang.  F.  (Editor).  Forest 
insects  of  Hainan.  Science  Press.  Beijing,  China.  1064  pp. 

Yang,  D.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1999a.  New  and  little  known  species  of  Dolichopodidae  from  China 
(V).  Bulletin  de  Flnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  69:215-232. 

Yang,  D.  and  P.  Grootaert.  1999b.  Dolichopodidae  (Diptera:  Empidoidea)  from  Xishuangbanna 
(China,  Yunnan  province):  the  Dolichopodinae  and  the  genus  Chaetogonoptemn  (I).  Bulletin  de 
Flnstitut  Royal  des  Sciences  Naturelles  de  Belgique,  Entomologie  69:251-277. 

Yang,  D.  and  T.  Saigusa.  2001.  New  species  of  Sympycninae  and  Diaphorinae  from  Yunnan. 
Southwest  China  (Empidoidea:  Dolichopodidae).  Studia  Dipterologica  8(2):505-520. 


284  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


NARROW  CRAWL  SPACE  INCREASES  CAPTURE 

OF  COCKROACHES  (BLATTODEA) 

IN  ADHESIVE  TRAPS' 

Rif  S.  EI-Mallakh2  and  Michael  J.  Hartmann3 

ABSTRACT:  Cockroaches  are  a  significant  public  health  problem  and  are  the  most  disliked  urban 
pests.  Cockroach  control  relies  heavily  on  the  use  of  chemical  pesticides,  which  are  equally  disliked 
by  the  general  public.  Nontoxic,  effective  methods  of  eliminating  cockroaches  are  in  general  demand. 
The  double-surface  habitat  adhesive  cockroach  trap  is  a  novel  design  that  takes  advantage  of  the 
cockroaches'  predilection  for  narrow  spaces  as  its  major  attractant.  The  trap  also  takes  advantage  of 
the  broad,  flat  dorsal  surface  of  the  cockroach  by  utilizing  adhesive  on  both  the  floor  and  the  ceiling 
of  the  insects'  crawl  space.  This  trap  was  tested  under  laboratory  conditions  and  found  to  be  seven 
times  more  effective  than  popular  Roach  Motel".  The  addition  of  pheromonal  attractants  might  in- 
crease the  effectiveness  of  the  trap  further. 

KEY  WORDS:  Blattodea,  nonchemical  control,  narrow  crawl  space,  adhesive  traps. 

Cockroaches  are  probably  among  the  most  common  and  the  most  despised 
urban  pests  (Potter  and  Bessin  1998).  Furthermore,  they  have  been  implicated  as 
vectors  of  bacterial  pathogens  (Burgess  and  Chetwyn  1981,  Graffer  and  Mertens 
1960;  Mackerras  and  Mackerras  1949)  and  may  harbor  these  organisms  for  pro- 
longed periods  of  time  (Stek  1982,  Stek,  Peterson  and  Alexander  1978).  More 
recent  data  suggest  that  cockroaches  are  an  important  etiological  factor  in  human 
asthma  (Rosenstreich  et  al.  1997,  Sarpong  et  al.  1997).  Among  professional  ento- 
mologists, cockroaches  are  responsible  for  78  percent  of  occupational  allergies 
(Wirtz  1980). 

There  are  many  approaches  to  cockroach  control,  including  fumigation, 
directed  spraying,  and  baited  traps.  In  a  survey  of  attitudes  among  the  general 
public,  Potter  and  Bessin  (1998)  found  that  77  percent  were  either  very  or  some- 
what concerned  about  the  use  of  pesticides  to  control  insects  in  the  home.  As  a 
consequence  of  this,  the  use  of  baited  traps  has  greatly  increased  in  recent  years 
(Potter  and  Bessin  1998). 

This  report  describes  the  laboratory  effectiveness  of  an  adhesive  trap  for  cock- 
roaches, where  the  "bait"  is  the  cockroaches'  own  predilection  for  narrow  crawl 
spaces.  The  trap's  design  also  makes  use  of  the  insect's  broad  flat  dorsal  surface 
by  having  adhesive  on  both  the  "floor"  and  the  "ceiling"  of  the  trap.  The  results 
suggest  that  this  is  a  very  effective  design. 


'  Received  on  August  16,  2002.  Accepted  on  March  13,  2004. 

:  Mood  Disorders  Research  Program,  Department  of  Psychiatry  and  Behavioral  Sciences,  University 
of  Louisville  School  of  Medicine.  Louisville,  Kentucky  40202  U.S.A.  E-mail:  rselmaOIx/ 
louisville.edu. 

'Electrical  Geodesic,  Inc.  Eugene,  Oregon  97403  U.S.A.  E-mail:  aafan@mindspring.com. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  114,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


METHODS 

The  trap  is  constructed  of  three  sheets  of  cardboard  measuring  11.5  x  15  cm 
and  separated  by  spacers  5  mm  high.  The  internal  crawl  spaces  are  lined  with 
two-sided  tape  (Scotch  Rug  and  Carpet  Tape,  3M,  St  Paul,  MN)  (Figure  1 ).  Since 
the  trap  was  designed  to  utilize  the  cockroaches'  behavioral  predilection  to  tight 
spaces,  it  is  called  a  "habitat"  trap.  Similar  designs  have  been  patented  (Grey 
1977,  Gang  1995). 

The  testing  of  the  traps  was  performed  in  plastic  chambers  measuring  41x21 
x  18  cm.  These  were  attached  to  each  other  by  polyethylene  tubing  (2.5  cm  diam- 
eter) to  form  a  three-chambered  testing  arena  (Figure  2).  Ten  adult  American 
cockroaches  (Periplaneta  americana)  were  placed  in  the  middle  chamber,  which 
also  contained  food  (a  cut  apple)  and  water.  One  of  the  end  chambers  contained 
a  Roach  Motel"  (Black  Flag),  and  the  other  a  habitat  trap.  The  Roach  Motel"  is 
approximately  12  x  8  cm  with  a  crawl  space  that  is  some  6  cm  high.  It  contains 
a  gel-like  glue  on  both  broad  inside  surfaces  of  the  trap  so  that  the  trap  can  be 
placed  on  either  side,  however,  the  inside  space  is  very  large  in  relation  to  the 
size  of  the  cockroach.  The  chambers  were  then  sealed  with  a  ventilated  plastic 
cover  and  placed  in  the  dark  at  24  -26°C  for  one  week.  At  the  end  of  that  time, 
the  chambers  were  opened  and  the  cockroach  position  noted.  The  experiment 
was  conducted  in  quadruplicate. 


Figure  1 .  Schematic  diagram  of  the  habitat  cockroach  trap  and  an  entrapped 
cockroach. 


286 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Figure  2.  Schematic  of  the  experiments  comparing  the  Roach  Motel"  (left  inner  box)  and 
the  habitat  trap  (right  inner  box).  Three  identical  plastic  chambers  were  connected  by  plas- 
tic tubing.  Ten  adult  P.  americana  were  placed  in  the  middle  chamber  (which  also  con- 
tained food  and  water),  and  the  chambers  were  sealed  for  one  week.  At  the  time  of  the 
reopening  of  the  chambers,  the  positions  of  the  cockroaches  were  noted.  The  experiment 
was  conducted  in  quadruplicate,  for  a  total  of  40  cockroaches. 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Figure  2  presents  the  cockroach  distribution  at  the  end  of  one  week  for  40 
cockroaches.  The  habitat  trap  captured  over  seven  times  as  many  cockroaches  as 
the  alternative  baited  adhesive  trap  (P  <  0.01,  z  =  5.06,  using  a  test  for  examin- 
ing proportional  data  [El-Mallakh  et  al.  1994]).  This  is  especially  notable  given 
that  the  cockroaches  had  to  physically  engage  with  the  habitat  trap  as  a  conse- 
quence of  their  exploratory  behavior,  whereas  the  Roach  Motel11  possesses  a 
pheromone  attractant  in  addition  to  its  physical  profile. 

The  "attractant"  of  the  habitat  trap  is  the  narrow  space  into  which  cockroach- 
es escape  for  safety.  The  current  study  suggests  that  this  behavior  is  a  powerful 
force  in  cockroaches.  However,  the  design  of  the  habitat  trap  does  not  exclude 
the  use  of  another  bait.  For  example,  a  pheromone  could  be  added  to  the  trap  to 
potentially  further  increase  the  efficacy  of  the  trap. 

It  is  believed  that  the  utilization  of  adhesive  on  both  the  floor  and  the  ceiling 
of  the  trap  increased  its  efficiency.  As  the  cockroach  enters  the  narrow  space  and 
struggles  to  free  its  legs  from  the  adhesive  on  the  floor,  it  pushes  its  broad  dor- 
sal surface  up  against  the  adhesive  on  the  ceiling  of  the  space,  effectively  anchor- 
ing the  animal  to  the  trap  (Fig.  1 ). 

There  are  limits  to  the  conclusions  that  can  be  drawn  from  these  studies.  The 
experimental  setup  had  no  "safe"  hiding  place  for  the  cockroaches.  Thus,  it  is 
important  to  examine  this  trap  under  "field"  conditions  where  alternative  narrow 
crevices  are  available  for  the  animals.  Furthermore,  the  concentration  of  cock- 
roaches per  area  is  much  higher  in  the  experimental  setup  than  would  occur 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 287 

under  field  conditions.  This  factor  may  have  increased  the  apparent  effectiveness 
of  the  traps.  Finally,  since  the  efficacy  of  the  trap  is  dependent  on  adhesively  cap- 
turing the  cockroach  by  its  dorsal  surface,  the  size  of  the  spacing  may  be  species- 
specific.  If  this  is  true,  then  a  separate  trap  type  would  be  needed  for  different  tar- 
get species.  In  this  regard,  the  sloped  ceiling  design  of  Gray  (1977)  may  be  supe- 
rior. Despite  these  shortcomings,  the  data  suggest  that  the  habitat  trap  is  superi- 
or to  other  widely  used  baited  adhesive  traps  for  the  P.  americana.  Field  trials  are 
warranted. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Burgess,  N.  R.  H.  and  K.  N.  Chetwyn.  1981.  Association  of  cockroaches  with  an  outbreak  of 
dysentery.  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Tropical  Medicine  and  Hygiene  75:332-333. 

EI-Mallakh,  R.  S.,  R.  Cowdry,  and  I.  E.  Pettigrew.  1994.  A  simple  technique  for  determining  sta- 
tistical significance  of  proportional  criteria.  Journal  of  Health  Care  Quality  16:14-16. 

Gang,  B.  K.   1995.  Insect  trap  kit.  United  States  patent  number  5,454,186.  October  3,  1995. 

Graffer,  M.  and  S.  Mertens.  1960.  Le  role  des  blattes  dans  la  Transmission  des  salmonelloses. 
Annals  d'Instirute  de  Pasteur  79:654-660. 

Gray,  J.  R.   1977.  Insect  trap.  United  States  patent  number  4,031,654.  June  28,  1977. 

Mackerras,  I.  M.  and  M.  J.  Mackerras.  1949.  An  epidemic  of  infantile  gastroenteritis  caused  by 
Salmonella  hovis  morbificans.  Journal  of  Hygiene  47:166-181. 

Potter,  M.  F.  and  R.  T.  Bessin.  1998.  Pest  control,  pesticides,  and  the  public:  attitudes  and  impli- 
cations. American  Entomologist  44:142-147. 

Rosenstreich,  D.  L.,  P.  Eggleston,  M.  Kattan,  D.  Baker,  R.  G.  Slavin,  P.  Gergen,  H.  Mitchell,  K. 
McNiff-Mortimer,  H.  Lynn,  D.  Ownby,  and  F.  Malveaux.  1997.  The  role  of  cockroach  aller- 
gy and  exposure  to  cockroach  allergen  in  causing  morbidity  among  inner-city  children  with  asth- 
ma. New  England  Journal  of  Medicine  336:1356-1363. 

Sarpong,  S.  B.,  R.  A.  Wood,  T.  Karrison,  and  P.  A.  Eggleston.  1977.  Cockroach  allergen  (Bla  g 
1 )  in  school  dust.  Journal  of  Allergy  and  Clinical  Immunology  99:486-492. 

Stek,  M.,  Jr.  1982.  Cockroaches  and  enteric  pathogens.  Transactions  of  the  Royal  Society  of 
Tropical  Medicine  and  Hygiene  76:566-567. 

Stek,  M.,  Jr.,  R.  V.  Peterson,  and  R.  L.  Alexander.  1978.  Retention  of  bacteria  in  the  alimentary 
tract  of  the  cockroach,  Blattella  germanica.  Journal  of  Environmental  Health  41:212-213. 

Wirt/,  R.  A.  1980.  Occupational  allergies  to  arthropods  -  documentation  and  prevention.  Bulletin 
of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  26:356-360. 


288  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


BOOK  REVIEW 

THE  PASSIONATE  OBSERVER.  WRITINGS  FROM  THE  WORLD  OF  NATURE. 
Jean-Henri  Fabre.  Watercolors  by  Marlene  McLoughlin.  1998.  Chronicle  Books.  85 
Second  Street,  San  Francisco,  California  94105  U.S.A.  Price,  including  shipping, 
varies  considerably  (e.g.  http://www.addall.com/,  http://www.  alibris.com/home.cfm, 
http://www.bookfmder.com/,  and  others). 

Fabre 's  The  Passionate  Observer,  intertwines  his  love  for  nature  with  his  life.  A  college  math  teacher, 
Fabre  ponders  about  what  could  have  happened  "if  unobsessed  by  the.v  and  v,  I  had  devoted  myself  whole- 
heartedly to  my  inclinations"!  Moquin-Tandon,  a  mentor,  encouraged  Fabre  to  follow  his  vocation  with 
confidence  using  these  words:  "Get  to  the  beast,  the  plant;  and,  if,  as  I  believe,  the  fever  [for  their  study] 
burns  in  your  veins,  you  will  find  men  to  listen  to  you."  While  profession  is  what  one  does  for  a  living, 
vocation  (<  Latin,  vocare,  or  call)  is  the  seizing  of  a  joyful  something  that  resides  within  oneself.  As  Fabre 
puts  it,  "from  early  childhood,  from  the  moment  of  my  first  mental  awakening,  I  have  felt  drawn  towards 
the  things  of  nature  ...  I  had  the  gift,  the  bump  of  observation."  Vocation  is  what  brings  humans  to  life  as 
it  helps  us  find  meaning  in  our  everyday  actions. 

This  collection  of  short  stories,  mostly  about  the  little  creatures  and  their  surroundings,  is  filled  with 
natural  history  (e.g.  omnivory  in  some  grasshoppers,  including  eating  cicadas  on  their  diet;  reproduction 
in  some  grasshoppers),  political  and  social  commentary  (e.g.  "We  are  celebrating  to-day,  with  greater  up- 
roar than  conviction...  the  fall  of  the  Bastille...  In  a  century  or  two,  will  anyone,  outside  the  historians,  give 
a  thought"),  a  cavalcade  of  poetry,  insightful  reflections  on  his  life,  and,  above  all,  the  wonders  of  the  insect 
world  (e.g.  the  evolution  of  parental  care  and  other  behaviors  of  insects  or  how  some  pentatomid  nymphs 
ecclose).  Fabre  was  a  strong  believer  in  combining  field  and  laboratory  observations,  modeling,  and  exper- 
imentation. Interestingly,  numerous  remarks  by  Fabre  show  his  keen  awareness  of  the  importance  of 
behavior,  genetics,  whose  details  were  unknown  at  that  time:  the  environment,  trade-offs,  biomechanics, 
functional  morphology,  and  their  impact  on  insect  evolution  that  are  ahead  of  his  time. 

As  in  Souvenirs  Entomologiques,  Fabre's  prose  is  ornate  yet  simple  and  it  captivates  the  attentive  read- 
er. In  contrast  to  those  who  talk  or  write  to  impress  others  with  "barbarous  vocabulary"  or  those  who 
believe  truth  is  related  to  authority,  Fabre  believes  that  "lucidity  is  the  sovereign  politeness  of  the  visitor". 
There  is  a  beautiful  element  of  wholesomeness,  such  as  in  his  "vast  cobalt  blue  skies"  or  the  "small  boys 
of  the  neighborhood"  that  made  us  recall  tales  of  Hans  Christian  Andersen  or  Circe  du  Solid's  movie 
Journey  of  Man.  How  would  Fabre  have  reacted  if  he  would  have  had  access  to  the  tools  of  modern  biol- 
ogy, such  as  a  scanning  electron  microscope,  to  satiate  his  desire  for  life-long  learning? 

The  Passionate  Observer  made  us  recall  times  when  life  seemed  simpler.  Surrounded  by  the  gentleness 
of  pastel  colored  aquarelles  and  frequent  flashbacks  to  his  younger  years,  Fabre's  wit  (e.g.  "no  pleasure... 
can  be  fully  relished  without  an  added  condiment  of  pain")  brought  the  same  smile  to  our  hearts  that  our 
dear  European  friends  Niilo  Virkki  and  Pierre  Jolivet  have,  especially  when  they  tell  us  stories  about  the 
natural  world.  This  book  has  gems  for  many  readers,  especially  for  those  who  are  still  children  at  heart,  on 
how  to  find  answers  to  queries  about  the  natural  world  or  how  to  learn  about  the  historical  background 
upon  which  the  life  of  one  scientist  is  unraveled  (e.g.  remarks  on  a  marine  biology  laboratory  interested  in 
finding  out  "how  the  yolk  of  annelid's  egg  is  constructed"  in  contrast  to  his  pleas  for  "an  entomological 
laboratory  for  the  study  ...  of  the  living  insect"),  or  just  how  to  have  some  good  fun  reading  "in  the  mid- 
dle of  July...  [t]he  astronomical  dog-days." 

We  recommend  savoring  The  Passionate  Observer  during  quiet  moments  of  reflection.  Fabre's  sense 
of  vocation  can  be  best  enjoyed  when  one  gets  to  do  what  he  does:  observing  the  natural  world  in  quiet  and 
reverent  appreciation.  Perhaps,  this  can  help  us  gain  our  own  inner  sense  of  vocation  and  make  us  remem- 
ber what  it  was  that  called  us  into  our  passion  in  the  first  place. 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay  Suzanne  C.  Shaffer 

Department  of  Paleobiology  Center  for  Teaching  and  Learning 

MRC-121,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History  Montgomery  College 

Smithsonian  Institution,  P.O.  Box  37012  7600  Takoma  Avenue 

Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012  U.S.A.  Takoma  Park,  Maryland  20912  U.S.A. 

E-mail:  santiago-blay(o)nmnh. si.edu.  E-mail:  suzshaff@yahoo.com. 


Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 289 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

CONFIRMATION  OF  THE  PYGMY  SNOWFLY, 
ALLOCAPNIA  PYGMAEA  (BURMEISTER) 

(PLECOPTERA:  CAPNIIDAE), 
FROM  NORTH  DAKOTA,  UNITED  STATES' 

B.  C.  Kondratieff   and  R.  W.  Baumann' 

Kondratieff  and  Baumann  (1999)  listed  fifteen  stonefly  taxa,  including  eleven 
confirmed  species  for  North  Dakota.  Included  only  as  a  genus  record  was  the 
snowfly  genus  Allocapnia  based  on  nymphs.  We  predicted  that  based  on  known 
distributional  proximity,  the  most  likely  species  of  Allocapnia  occurring  in  North 
Dakota  would  be  A.  pygmaea  (Burmeister).  Recently,  a  vial  of  Allocapnia  spec- 
imens was  brought  to  our  attention  by  eminent  coleopterist  Robert  D.  Gordon  at 
the  National  Museum  of  Natural  History.  He  collected  these  stoneflies  from  a 
small  stream  in  southeastern  North  Dakota,  Sargent  County.  These  specimens  in- 
cluded four  adult  males  of  A.  pygmaea  allowing  species  confirmation.  This  sub- 
boreal  species  occurs  in  a  transverse  band  across  the  northern  United  States  and 
southern  Canada,  south  to  Tennessee,  with  disjunct  populations  in  the  Ozark 
Mountains  of  Missouri  (Ross  et  al.  1967,  Ross  and  Ricker  1971,  Poulton  and 
Stewart  1991).  Allocapnia  is  considered  an  eastern  deciduous  forest  associated 
group  of  stoneflies  (Ross  and  Ricker  1971),  and  presently  includes  43  species 
(Kondratieff  and  Kirchner  2000). 

Ross  et  al.  (1967)  postulated  that  during  the  Wisconsin  glacial  maximum, 
A.  pygmaea  occurred  south  of  the  ice  sheets  in  the  Cumberland  Plateau  region  of 
east  central  United  States.  Dispersal  northward  and  westward  of  this  species  oc- 
curred during  the  post-Wisconsinan  times,  into  deglaciated  regions,  following  a 
northern  route  over  the  Great  Lakes  (see  Ross  et  al.  1967,  Fig.  2).  An  alternative 
hypothesis  proposes  that  these  North  Dakota  populations  are  remnants  of  north- 
ern dispersals  from  the  Missouri  Ozark  populations.  However,  the  North  Dakota 
males  are  clearly  most  similar  to  northeastern  populations  and  not  to  the  males 
described  by  Ross  et  al.  (1967)  from  Missouri.  The  Minnesota  records  of  A.  pyg- 
maea are  from  areas  along  Lake  Superior  and  south  of  Minneapolis  next  to  near- 
by Michigan  (Ross  and  Ricker  1971,  Lager  et  al.  1979).  Recently,  Heimdal  et  al. 
(2004)  reported  A.  pygmaea  from  northeastern  Iowa.  It  then  appears  that  the 
southeastern  North  Dakota  populations  of  this  species  clearly  fit  the  dispersal 
pattern  proposed  by  Ross  et  al.  (1967),  and  have  originated  from  a  single  source. 


'  Received  on  February  14,  2004.  Accepted  on  July  16,  2004. 

1  Department  of  Bioagricultural  Sciences  and  Pest  Management.  Colorado  State  University,  Fort 
Collins,  Colorado  80523  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Boris. Kondratieff(«  colostate.edu. 

'  Department  of  Integrative  Biology,  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Science  Museum,  Brigham  Young  Uni- 
versity, Provo,  Utah  84602  U.S.A.  E-mail:  Richard_Bautnann(«  byu.edu. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


290  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


The  Sargent  County  record  represents  the  most  western  record  for  Allocapnia 
and  outside  the  eastern  deciduous  forest  biome. 

Material  Examined:  North  Dakota:  Sargent  Co.,  South  of  Cayuga,  7  miles  NW  of  Verblen,  South 
Dakota,  21  March  1966,  R.  D.  Gordon,  Aarhus  and  Tweten,  4  males,  1  female,  7  nymphs  (National 
Museum  of  Natural  History,  Entomology,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  U.S.A.). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Dr.  Robert  Gordon  for  encouraging  us  to  look  for  these  specimens  at  the  Smithsonian 
Institution.  Dr.  Oliver  S.  Flint,  Jr.  facilitated  the  loan  that  led  to  this  paper. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

I  It  inuhil.  D.  P.,  R.  E.  DeWalt,  and  T.  F.  Wilton.  2004.  An  annotated  checklist  of  the  stoneflies 
(Plecoptera)  of  Iowa.  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  Washington  (In  press). 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.  and  R.  W.  Baumann.  1999.  Studies  on  stoneflies  of  North  Dakota  with  the 
description  of  a  new  Perlesta  species  (Plecoptera:  Perlidae).  Proceedings  of  the  Entomological 
Society  of  Washington  101:  325-331. 

Kondratieff,  B.  C.  and  R.  F.  Kirchner.  2000.  Two  new  Allocapnia  from  eastern  North  America 
(Plecoptera:  Capniidae).  Annals  of  the  Entomological  Society  of  America  93:  1267-1273. 

Lager,  T.  IM.,  M.  D.  Johnson,  S.  N.  Williams,  and  J.  L.  McCulloch.  1979.  A  preliminary  report 
on  the  Plecoptera  and  Trichoptera  of  Northeastern  Minnesota.  Great  Lakes  Entomologist  12:  109- 
114. 

Poulton,  B.  C.  and  K.  W.  Stewart.  1991.  The  stoneflies  of  the  Ozark  and  Ouachita  Mountains  (Ple- 
coptera). Memoirs  of  the  American  Entomological  Society  38.  116  pp. 

Ross,  H.  H.,  G.  L.  Rotramel,  J.  E.  H.  Martin,  and  J.  F.  McAlpine.  1967.  Postglacial  colonization 
of  Canada  by  its  subboreal  winter  stoneflies  of  the  genus  Allocapnia.  Canadian  Entomologist  99: 

703-712. 

Ross,  H.  H.  and  W.  E.  Ricker.  1971.  The  classification,  evolution,  and  dispersal  of  the  winter 
stonefly  genus  Allocapnia.  Illinois  Biological  Monograph  45.  106  pp. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 291 

SCIENTIFIC  NOTE 

MYIASIS  IN  BRISTLE-SPINED  PORCUPINE, 

CHAETOMYS  SVBSPINOSUS  (OLFERS,  1818), 

IN  BAHIA,  BRAZIL1 

Adriana  Akemi  Kuniy-  and  Caroline  Nascimento  Santos2 

Two  specimens  ofChaetomys  subspinosus  (Olfers,  1818)  (Rodentia,  Echimyi- 
dae,  Chaetomyinae)  infested  by  screwworm  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  (Co- 
querel,  1858)  (Diptera:  Calliphoridae)  were  captured  in  an  Atlantic  Forest  frag- 
ment at  Salvador,  northeastern  Brazil,  on  March  24  and  April  12,  2003.  One  of 
them  had  parasite  infestation  on  the  left  of  its  face,  between  its  ear  and  buccal 
cavity  (Fig.  1);  the  other  one  had  70  percent  tail  infestation.  The  specimens  were 
brought  to  a  Wild  Animal  Rehabilitation  Center  due  to  screwworm  infestation 
located  in  the  body  of  the  animals  and  were  treated  with  chemical  products  (clor- 
pirifos,  diclorvos),  before  their  translocation  to  a  permanent  place  in  reserve. 
Despite  this  procedure,  none  of  them  survived  treatment  more  than  one  day. 
Cochliomyia  hominivorax  is  an  ectoparasite  usually  found  in  skin  and  mucous 
secretion  during  its  larval  phases.  This  screwworm  develops  in  live  tissues  of 
their  hosts  in  only  one  lesion  considered  relatively  large,  with  repulsive  secretion 
(Keller  et  al.,  2002).  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  has  been  reported  in  humans 
(Duqueetal.,  1990;  Leclercq  1990;  Mehretal.,  1991;  Boulard  and  Quiroz  1991; 
Kron,  1992)  and  in  domestic  mammals,  such  as  cattle  (Sanavria  et  al.,  1996; 
Moya  Borja  et  al.,  1993),  sheep,  pigs,  goats,  mules,  donkeys,  dogs,  and  cats 
(Rawlings  and  Cheng  Sang  1984;  Costa  et  al.,  1985;  Amarante  et  al.,  1992; 
Mariluis  et  al.,  1994).  It  also  can  be  found  in  Brazilian  sylvan  mammals,  like  the 
porcupine  (Coen dou  prehensilis  prehensilis)  (Lacey  and  George  1981).  This  is 
the  first  record  of  an  infestation  by  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  in  Cochliomyia 
subspinosus  porcupines. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  are  grateful  to  Mr.  Marco  Tiilio  R.  Brasileiro  and  MSc  Adriana  Lampert  who  identified  the 
parasite,  to  Dr.  Mario  de  Vivo  that  encouraged  this  paper,  and  MSc  Cristiane  Villaca  and  Mr. 
Guilherme  Barco  for  their  comments  and  review. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Amarante,  A.  F.  T.,  M.  A.  Barbosa,  T.  C.  Oliveira-Siqueira,  and  S.  Fernandes.  1992.  Epidemi- 
ology of  sheep  myiasis  in  Sao  Paulo.  Brazil.  Tropical  Animal  Health  and  Production  24(  1 ):  36- 
39. 


'  Received  on  August  12,  2004.  Accepted  on  August  13,  2004. 

:  JGP  Consultoria  e  Participacoes  Ltda.R.  Americo  Brasiliensc.  615,  04715-003,  SP,  Brazil.  E-mails: 
araradri@ig.com.br;  caledog@bol.com.br,  respectively. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


292 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Fig.  1. 

Cochliomyia  sub- 
spinosus  porcupine 
infested  by 
Cochliomyia 
hominivorax  screw- 
worms.  Note 
lesions  on  left  side 
of  the  face, 
between  its  ear  and 
buccal  cavity. 


Boulard,  C.  and  H.  Quiroz.  1991.  Cutaneous  myiasis:  recent  advances  in  biology,  immunology 
and  improvements  of  control  measures.  Annales  de  Parasitologie  Humaine  et  Comparee  66 
(Supplement  l):52-57. 

Costa.  A.  F.  and  L.  S.  Vieira.  1985.  Permanent  ectoparasites  of  goats  and  sheep  in  Sobral,  Ceara, 
Brazil.  Pesquisa  Agropecuaria  Brasileira  19(5):639-646. 

Duque,  C.,  G.  Marrugo,  and  R.  Valderrama.  1990.  Otolaryngic  manifestation  of  myiasis.  Ear 
Nose  &  Throat  Journal  69(9):6 19-622. 

Roller,  W.  W.,  C.  J.  B.  Carvalho,  and  A.  Gomes.  2002.  Dipteros  sinantropicos  em  area  de  tran- 
sicao  entre  o  Pantanal  e  o  Cerrado  brasileiro.  Dados  preliminares.  In:  Congresso  Brasileiro  de 
Parasitologia  Veterinaria,  12,  1.  Rio  de  Janeiro,  2002.  Programas  e  Resumes.  Rio  de  Janeiro, 
Brazil.  CBPV/UFRRJ/PJ  Eventos,  R386.pdf  (CD-ROM). 

Kron,  M.  A.  1992.  Human  infestation  with  Cochliomyia  hominivorax,  the  New  World  screwworm. 
Journal  of  the  American  Academy  of  Dermatology  27(2,  part  1  ):264-265. 

Lacey,  L.  A.  and  T.  K.  George.  1980.  Myiasis  in  an  Amazonian  Porcupine.  Entomological  News 
92(2):79-80. 

Leclercq,  M.  1990.  Import  of  animal  and  human  tropical  myiasis  by  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  in 
Libya  (Diptera:  Calliphoridae).  Revue  Medicale  de  Liege  45(9):452-457. 

Marilius,  J.  C.,  J.  A.  Schnack,  I.  Cerverizzo,  and  C.  Quintana.  1994.  Cochliomvia  hominivorax 
(Coquerel,  1858)  and  Phoenicia  sericata  (Meigen,  1826)  Parasiting  Domestic  animals  in  Buenos 
Aires  and  Vicinities  (Diptera,  Calliphoridae).  Memorias.  Institute  Oswado  Cruz  (Rio  de  Janeiro, 
Brazil)  89(2):  139. 

Mehr,  Z.,  N.  R.  Powers,  and  K.  A.  Konkol.  1991.  Myiasis  in  a  wounded  soldier  returning  from 
Panama.  Journal  of  Medical  Entomology  28(4):553-554. 

Moya-Borja,  G.  E.,  C.  M.  B.  Oliveira,  R.  A.  Muni/,  and  L.  C.  B.  Goncalves.  1993.  Phophylactic 
and  persistent  efficacy  of  Doramectin  against  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  in  cattle.  Veterinary 
Parasitology  49  ( 1 ):  95-105. 

Rawlins,  S.  C.  and  Chen  Sang.  1984.  Screwworm  myiasis  in  Jamaica  and  proposals  for  its  eradi- 
cation. Tropical  Pest  Management  30(2):  125- 129. 

Sanavria,  A.,  R.  A.  Muniz,  L.  C.  B.  Goncalves,  R.  S.  Row,  and  D.  S.  F.  Silva.  1996  Prophylactic 
efficacy  of  Doramectin  against  natural  infections  of  Cochliomyia  hominivorax  (Coquerel,  1858) 
on  castrated  cattle.  Revista  Brasileira  de  Parasitologia  Veterinaria  5(  1  ):7-10. 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 293 

STATEMENT  OF  OWNERSHIP,  MANAGEMENT, 
AND  CIRCULATION 

1 .  Title  of  publication:  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 

2.  Date  of  filing:  August  7,  2004 

3.  Frequency  of  issue:  Bimonthly  except  July  and  August 

4.  Location  of  known  office  of  publication:  American  Entomological  Society, 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

5.  Location  of  the  headquarters  of  general  business  offices  of  the  publishers: 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway,  Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

6.  Name  and  address  of  the  Publisher,  Editor  and  Business  Manager: 

Publisher:  American  Entomological  Society,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 

Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 
Editor:  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay,  Department  of  Paleobiology,  National  Museum  of 

Natural  History,  MRC-121  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  DC  2013-7012 
Business  Manager:   Faith  B.  Kuehn,  3789  Foulk  Rd.,  Boothwyn,  PA  19061 

7.  Owner:  American  Entomological  Society,  1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway, 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195 

8.  Known  bondholders,  mortgagees  and  other  security  holders  owning  or  holding  one  percent 
or  more  of  the  total  amounts  of  bonds,  mortgages  and  other  securities:  None 

9.  For  optional  completion  by  publishers  mailing  at  the  regular  rates:  signed 

1 0.  For  completion  by  nonprofit  organizations  authorized  to  mail  at  special  rates:  The  purpose, 
function  and  nonprofit  status  of  this  organization  and  the  exempt  status  for  Federal  income 
tax  purposes:  Have  not  changed  during  the  preceding  12  months. 

Average  No.  Copies  Actual  No.  Copies  of 

Each  Issue  During  Single  Issue  Published 

Preceding  /_  Months  Nearest  to  Filing  Date 

11.  Extent  and  nature,  circulation 

A.  Total  no.  copies  printed  745  725 

B.  Paid  Circulation 

C.  Total  paid  circulation  563  563 

D.  Free  distribution  by  mail,  carrier 

Or  other  means,  samples  0  0 

Complimentary,  and  other  14  14 

E.  Total  Distribution 

F.  Office  use,  leftover,  unaccounted  48  48 
Spoiled  after  printing 

G.  Copies  for  reprints  120  100 
H.  TOTAL                                                             745                                   725 

1 2. 1  certify  that  the  statements  by  me  above 
are  correct  and  complete. 


Faith  B.  Kuehn,  Business  Manager 


MAILING  DATES 

FOR  VOLUME  114,2003 

No.                Date  of  Issue 

Pages                  Mailing  Date 

1               Jan.  &  Feb.  2003 

1-60                   April  9,  2004 

Mar.  &  Apr.  2003 

61-120                 June  23,  2004 

May  &  June  2003 

121-180                  Julv  28,  2004 

4               Sept.  &  Oct.  2003 

IS  1-240             August  25,  2004 

5               Nov.  &  Dec.  2003 

24  1  -300        September  30,  2004 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


294  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  TO 

REVIEWERS  OF  ARTICLES  PUBLISHED  IN 

ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS  (VOLUME  114) 

AND  TO  VOLUNTEERS 

Jorge  A.  Santiago-Blay1 

I  am  profoundly  grateful  to  colleagues  from  around  the  world  who  have  gen- 
erously donated  their  time  and  energy  to  review  numerous  articles,  some  sub- 
mitted as  early  as  May  2001.  Their  names,  arranged  alphabetically  by  last  name, 
and  affiliations,  or  addresses,  follow. 

Anonymous  (several)  -  various  affiliations 

J.  D.  Barbour  -  University  of  Idaho,  Research  and  Development  Center,  Parma,  Idaho, 

United  States 
Richard  W.  Baumann  -  Department  of  Zoology  and  Monte  L.  Bean  Life  Science 

Museum,  Brigham  Young  University,  Provo,  Utah,  United  States 

Daniel  J.  Bickel  -  Entomology  Section,  Australian  Museum,  Sydney,  Australia 

Art  Borkent  -  Royal  British  Columbia  Museum,  Enderby,  British  Columbia,  Canada 

Howard  P.  Boyd  -  Tabernacle  Township  New  Jersey,  United  States 

Mark  W.  Brown  -  Appalachian  Fruit  Research  Station,  Kearneysville,  West  Virginia, 

United  States 
R.  J.  Chianese  -  New  Jersey  Department  of  Agriculture  Biocontrol  Laboratory,  Trenton, 

New  Jersey,  United  States 
Steven  Chordas     Vector-Born  Disease  Program,  Ohio  Department  of  Health,  Columbus, 

Ohio,  United  States 
Stephen  G.  A.  Compton  -  Centre  for  Biodiversity  and  Conservation,  School  of  Biology, 

University  of  Leeds,  Leeds,  England,  United  Kingdom 
Charles  V.  Covell,  Jr.  -  Department  of  Biology,  University  of  Louisville,  Louisville, 

Kentucky,  United  States 
Mark  Deyrup  -  Archbold  Biological  Station,  Lake  Placid,  Florida,  United  States 

Christopher  H.  Dietrich  -  Illinois  Natural  History  Survey,  Champaign,  Illinois,  United 
States 

Donna  R.  Ellis  -  Department  of  Plant  Sciences,  University  of  Connecticut,  Storrs, 
Connecticut,  United  States 

Gregory  Evans  -  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Gainesville,  Florida,  United 
States 

Neal  L.  Evenhuis  --  Department  of  Natural  Sciences,  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum, 
Honolulu,  Hawaii,  United  States 

Oliver  Flint  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 


Department   of  Paleobiology,    MRC-121    National    Museum   of  Natural    History,   Smithsonian 
Institution,  P.O.  Box  37012,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia  20013-7012,  U.S.A. 

Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  114.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 295 

Stephen  D.  Gaimari  -  California  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Plant  Pest  Diagnostics, 
Sacramento,  California,  United  States 

Michael  Gates  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Jon  Gelhaus  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Jaco  M.  Greeff  -  Department  of  Genetics,  University  of  Pretoria,  Pretoria,  South  Africa 

Patrick  Grootaert  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Royal  Belgian  Institute  of  Natural 
Sciences,  Brussels,  Belgium 

E.  Eric  Grissell  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of  Agri- 
culture, National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Eniilio  Guerrieri  -  Istituto  per  la  Protezione  delle  Piante,  Consiglio  Nazionale  delle 
Richerche,  Sezione  di  Portici,  Poerici,  Italia 

Steven  Harris  -  Department  of  Biology,  Clarion  University  of  Pennsylvania,  Clarion, 
Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Klaus-Gerhard  Heller  -  Department  of  Zoology,  University  of  Erlangen-Niirnberg,  Er- 
langen,  Germany 

Thomas  J.  Henry  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Gary  Hevel  —  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

E.  R.  Hoebeke  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Cornell  University,  Ithaca,  New  York, 
United  States 

Heron  Huerta  -  Laboratorio  de  Entomologia,  Departamento  de  Entomologia,  Institute 
Nacional  de  Diagnostico  y  Referencia  Epidemiologicos,  DGE,  Secretaria  de  Salud, 
Colonia  Santo  Tomas,  Distrito  Federal,  Mexico 

Sigfrid  Ingrish  --  Zoologisches  Forschungsinstitut  und  Museum  Alexander  Koenig 
(ZFMK),  Bonn,  Germany 

Susan  Whitney  King  -  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Delaware,  Newark, 
Delaware,  United  States 

John  M.  Kingsolver  Florida  State  Collection  of  Arthropods,  Gainesville,  Florida, 
United  States 

Boris  Kondratieff  Department  of  Agricultural  Sciences,  Colorado  State  University, 
Fort  Collins,  Colorado,  United  States 

Tom  Klubertan/  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  University  of  Wisconsin,  Rock 
County,  Janescille,  Wisconsin,  United  States 

Kipp  C.  Kruse  -  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  Eastern  Illinois  University,  Charles, 
Illinois,  United  States 

Steve  Lingafelter  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Charles  Mason  Department  of  Entomology,  University  of  Delaware,  Delaware,  United 
States 


296  ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


Michael  L.  May  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Rutgers  University,  New  Brunswick,  New 
Jersey,  United  States 

Pat  McCafferty  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University,  Lafayette,  Indiana, 
United  States 

J.  E.  McPherson  -  Department  of  Zoology,  Southern  Illinois  University,  Carbondale, 
Illinois,  United  States 

Arnold  Menke  -  Bisbee,  Arizona,  United  States 

Peter  Mundel  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

Charles  W.  O'Brien  -  Center  for  Biological  Control,  Florida  A  &  M  University,  Florida, 
United  States 

J.  Olejnieek  -  Institute  of  Parasitology,  Academy  of  Sciences,  Ceske  Budejovice,  Czech 
Republic 

Michelle  Pellissier  Scott  -  Department  of  Zoology,  Durham,  New  Hampshire,  United 
States 

Michael  Pogue  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Endrew  Polaszek  -  Entomology  Department,  The  Natural  History  Museum,  South  Ken- 
sington, London,  England,  United  Kingdom 

Dan  Polhemus  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

Marc  Pollet  Institute  for  the  promotion  of  Innovation  by  Science  and  Technology  in 
Flanders,  Brussels,  Belgium 

C.  Riley  Nelson  -  Department  of  Biological  Sciences,  University  of  Texas,  Austin,  Texas, 
United  States 

John  Noyes  -  Entomology  Department,  The  Natural  History  Museum,  South  Kensington, 
London,  England,  United  Kingdom 

Sean  O'Keefe  -  Department  of  Biology,  Morehead  State  University,  Morehead,  Ken- 
tucky, United  States 

David  A.  Roder  -  Department  of  Entomology,  North  Dakota  State  University,  Fargo, 
North  Dakota,  United  States 

Justin  D.  Runyon  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Pennsylvania  State  University,  Uni- 
versity Park,  Pennsylvania,  United  States 

Carl  Schaefer  -  Department  of  Ecology  and  Evolutionary  Biology,  University  of  Con- 
necticut, Storrs,  Connecticut,  United  States 

Michael  E.  Schauff  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

Steven  Schmidt  -  Zoologische  Staaatssammlung  Muenchen,  Munich,  Germany 

Joseph  C.  Shaffner  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Texas  A  &  M,  College  Station,  Texas, 
United  States 

Randall  T.  Schuh  -  Department  of  Entomology,  American  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
New  York,  NY,  United  States 

William  A.  Shear  -  Department  of  Biology,  Hampden-Sydney  College,  Virginia,  United 
States 


Vol.  1 14.  No.  5.  November  &  December  2003 297 

David  Smith  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of  Agricul- 
ture, National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United 
States 

Paul  J.  Spangler  -  Department  of  Entomology,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History, 
Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States 

William  P.  Stark  -  Department  of  Biology,  Mississippi  College,  Clinton,  Mississippi, 
United  States 

F.  Christian  Thompson  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Colum- 
bia, United  States 

Charles  A.  Triplehorn  -  Museum  of  Biodiversity,  The  Ohio  State  University,  Columbus, 
Ohio,  United  States 

Natalia  J.  Vanderberg  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Colum- 
bia, United  States 

Robert  Waltz  -  Division  of  Entomology  and  Plant  Pathology,  Indiana  Department  of 
Natural  Resources,  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  United  States 

Mick  E.  Webb  Entomology  Department,  The  Natural  History  Museum,  South  Kensing- 
ton, London,  England,  United  Kingdom 

Stephen  Wilson  -  Department  of  Biology,  Central  Missouri  State  University,  Warren- 
burg,  Missouri,  United  States 

Norman  Woodley  -  Systematic  Entomology  Laboratory,  United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Washington,  District  of  Columbia, 
United  States 

R.  Zhantiev  -  Department  of  Entomology,  Moscow  State  University,  Moscow,  Russia 

Also,  I  wish  to  highlight  the  labor  of  volunteers  who  have  worked  with  me  at  the 
Smithsonian  Institution  (Washington,  District  of  Columbia,  United  States).  As  part  of 
their  learning,  they  have  helped  in  different  steps  of  the  editorial  process:  Rama  Assaf 
(Montgomery  College,  Rockville,  Maryland),  Judith  Barr  (Holton-Arms  School,  Bethes- 
da,  Maryland),  Keshuan  Blunt  (Corcoran  College  of  Art  and  Design,  Washington,  District 
of  Columbia),  Gloria  Friar  (Program  for  Deaf  and  Hard  of  Hearing,  Prince  George's 
County  Public  Schools,  Upper  Marlboro,  Maryland),  Christine  Galvagna  (Bennington 
College,  Vermont),  Rebecca  Glazer  (Virginia  Tech,  Blacksburg,  Virginia),  Lester  Guthrie 
(Montgomery  College,  Rockville,  Maryland),  Bridget  Hansen  (George  Washington  Uni- 
versity, Washington,  District  of  Columbia),  Kirkland  Kenney  (Bennington  College,  Ver- 
mont) Julia  Louie  (University  of  Maryland,  College  Park),  Suzanne  Mclntire  (Arlington, 
Virginia),  William  Mclntire  (Franklin  and  Marshall  College,  Lancaster,  Pennsylvania), 
Carmen  Montopoli  (School  Without  Walls  High  School,  Washington,  District  of  Colum- 
bia), Yen  T  Nguyen  (District  of  Columbia  Public  Schools,  Washington),  Bethany  Sadlow- 
ski  (Arlington,  Virginia),  Adrian  Schneck  (Corcoran  College  of  Art  and  Design,  Wash- 
ington, District  of  Columbia),  Katherine  Schuler  (Corcoran  College  of  Art  and  Design, 
Washington,  District  of  Columbia),  Suzanne  C.  Shaffer  (Montgomery  College,  Takoma 
Park,  Maryland),  and  Anna  Thorn  (James  Madison  High  School,  Vienna.  Virginia). 

Without  the  effort  of  the  reviewers  and  the  volunteers,  our  goal  of  "catching-up"  would 
not  appear  as  close  to  fulfillment  as  it  is  now.  Any  omission  was  unintentional  and  entire- 
ly my  responsibility.  Any  colleague  whose  name  has  been  omitted  is  welcome  to  contact 
the  Editor  as  we  wish  to  dutifully  acknowledge  everyone  who  has  helped. 


29X 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


INDEX  -  VOLUME  114  (1-5)  2003 


Ableptemetes 37 

Acanthosomatidae 147 

Acerpenna  sulfurosiis 55 

Acknowledgments 294 

Adhesive  traps 284 

Adults 205 

Adventitious  biters 21 1 

Aeshnidae 233 

Agallia 181 

Agallinae 181 

Agaonidae , 152 

Alberta,  Canada 230 

Alfalfa  (Medicago  saliva) 105 

All  Taxa  Biodiversity  Inventory 246 

Allocapnia  pygmaea 289 

Allohercostomus 271 

Anobiidae 56 

Anthonomus  rubricosus 69 

Aphelinidae 10 

Aphididae 260 

Arecaceae 18 

Argentina 10,  69,  147,  156 

Arizona,  USA 117 

Armadillum  vulgare 61 

Atrichopogon 152 

Atwell,  D back  cover  (5) 

Auchenorrhyncha 246 

Aureoconopus 86 

A:va  orbigera  orbigera 92 

Baetidae 33,55 

Bahia,  Brazil  291 

Barr,  J 298 

Barrera,  E 121 

Bartlett,  C.R 246 

Bartolotta,  R.J 255 

Baumann,  R.W 289 

Beddows,  E 180 

Belize 164 

Biological  control 8,  59,  98 

Blastothrix  gurselae 187 

Blattodea 84 

Bowman,  J.L 246 

Braconidae 105 

Brailovsky,  H 18 

Brailovsky,  H 121 

Brazil 291 

Brevicorynella 260 

Bristle-spined  porcupine  291 

Brood-rearing 61 

Brown,  K 59 

Brown,  T back  cover  (5) 

Butterflies back  cover  (2) 

Calling  song 129 

Camras,  S 86 

Capniidae 289 

Carabidae 1 13 

Castillo,  M.L 138 

Cattlin,  N.D 59 

Central  (Middle)  America 29,  37,  1X1 

Ceratopogonidae 1 56 

Chaetogonopteron 279 

Chaetomys  subspinosus  291 

Chaffee/D.L 224 

Chalybion  californium 241 


Chen,  J-X 41,  47 

Chilopod 57 

China 41,  47,  75,  260,  279 

Chironomidae 1 17 

Chloropidae 205 

Chordas  III,  S.W 235 

Christiansen,  K.A 41,  47 

Chrysomelidae 75 

Cicada,  Why  Have  You  Slaved  Away  So  Long 

(song) back  cover  (3) 

Cicadellidae 181 

Cicindela  marginata 1  13 

Cirrospilus  neotropicus  n.  sp 98 

Citrus  Leafminer 98 

Cloyd,  R.A 237 

Coccinellidae 23,  192 

Coleoptera 7,23,56,69,75,81,  113,  138,192 

Collembola 47 

Colletidae  54 

Color  Handbook  of  Biological  Control  in  Plant 

Protection  (Book  Review) 59 

Colpurini 121 

Conifer 197 

Conopidae 86 

Copestylum  circumdatum 217 

Coreidae 18,  121 

Corixidae 235 

Coscaron,  M.  del  C 147 

Costa  Rica  54 

Couturier 18 

Cowper,  G back  cover  (4) 

Cricket  Bov back  cover  (5) 

Cricket 197 

Cui,  J-Z 75 

Curculionidae 69 

Cyphoderris  monstrosa 197 

Daniel  Boone  National  Forest 224 

Daxvcorixa  rawsoni 235 

Day,  W.  H 105 

de  Tonnancour,  J 60 

Delayed  reproduction 61 

Dellape,  P.M 147 

Diez,  P.A 98 

Diminished  food  resources 61 

Diptera 86,  1 1 7,  1 56,  205,  217,271,  275,  279 

Dolichopodidae 271,  275,  279 

Dolichopus 271 

Dorsey,  T 105 

Dragonfly 233 

Eaton,  A.T 105 

El-Mallakh,  R.S 284 

Elmidae 7 

Encyrtidae 187.  192 

Ephemeroptera 33,  37,  55,  230 

l-pler,  J.H 117 

Euliss,  Jr.,  N.H 235 

Eulophidae 98 

Fabre,  J.-H 288 

Fairchild,  G.W 239 

fall  flight  behavior 23 

Fidalgo,  P 98 

Fleenor,  S.B 179 

Fleischman,  P 180 

Freytag,  P.H I  SI 


Mailed  on  September  30,  2004 


Vol.  1 14,  No.  5,  November  &  December  2003 


299 


Fries,  J.  N 

Froeschner,  R.  C 29 

Fulgoroidea 246 

Fulgoromorpha 246 

Funk,  D.H 240 

Galvagna,  C.  G 1 

Garber,  B.  C back  cover  (1) 

Ge,  S-Q 75 

Gelhaus,  J.  ..back  cover  (2),  239,  240,  back  cover  (4) 

Giganti,  H 147 

Gracillariidae 98 

Great  Smoky  Mountains  National  Park 246 

Greenhouse  mites 58 

Grubbs.  S.  A 51 

Guangxi,  China 279 

Guthrie,  L.  H 60 

Gynandromorphism 1 52 

Habitat  preference 197 

Haglidae 197 

Hajek,  A 120 

Hanson,  B.A 235 

Harmonia  axyridis 23 

Hartman,  M.  J 284 

Hashemi,  A 61 

Helyer,  B 59 

Hemiptera 105,  187,235,246,260 

Herbivory 211 

Heterelmis  comalemsis 7 

Heteroptera 18,29,  121.  147.211 

Hicks,  M.  B 160 

Homalotylus 1 92 

Homoptera 181 

Host  plants 69 

Hoy,  M.  A 58 

Hydroptilidae 164,255 

Hymenoptera 10,  54.  98,  105,  152,  187,  192,241 

Immature  stages 147 

Indonesia 275 

Insecta 260 

Insects  of  the  Texas  Lost  Pines  (Book  Review) 1 79 

Insects  Revealed  (Book  Review) 60 

Interspecific  hybrid 91 

Isophya 129 

Isopoda 61 

Japoshvili,  G.0 187 

Jenkins,  J.M 233 

Jenkins,  R.A 233 

Jiang,  L 260 

Joyful  Noise.  Poems  (Book  Review) 180 

Karaca,  1 187 

Kciper,  J.  B 205,  255 

Kenney,  K.  A 1 

Kentucky,  U.S.A 224 

Kermes  palestiniensis 187 

Kermesidae 187 

Keth,  A.  C 164 

Keyghobadi,  N back  cover  (2) 

Kight,  S.  L 61 

Kim,  J.  W 10 

King.  S.  W back  cover  (1) 

Kjellberg,  F 152 

KondrateiiT,  B.  C 289 

Krestian,  B.  J 117 

Kuehn,  F.  B 293 

Kuniy,  A.  A ....291 

Kurczewski,  F.  E 241 

Ladau.  J 197 

Lady  beetle 23 

Lanteri,  A.  A 69 

Larva ...  ....69 


Lectotype 217 

Lenat,  D.  R ...33 

Lepidoptera 91,  98 

Leptoeglossus 18 

Leptohyhiidae 37 

Lester,  G.  T 117 

Letter  from  the  President  AES  back  cover  (1) 

Leucotrichia  pictipes 255 

Leuctra  carolinensis 51 

Leuctra  variabilis 51 

Leuctridae 51 

Limenitis  (Basilarchia) 91 

Loiacono,  M.  S 69 

Louie,  J 180 

Louisiana,  U.S.A 2 

Lucanidae 138 

Luc-anus  (Pseudolucanus)  mamma 138 

Lygux  lineolaris 105 

Ma,  Y-T 41,  47 

Macrosiphinae 260 

Macrotingis  29 

Marino.  P.  1 156 

Marinoni.  L 217 

Martinez  M.,  I 138 

Martinez,  P 147 

Marvaldi,  A.  E 69 

Maryland,  USA 51 

Masunaga,  K 271,  275,  279 

Mauritiaflexrosa 18 

Mayer,  M 105 

Mayflies 33,  55.  230 

McAllister,  C.  T 2 

McCafferty,  W.  P 33,  37,  230 

McClanahan,  E.  T 91 

Mclntire,  S 298 

Mendoza,  E back  cover  (5) 

Mexico 29,37,81,  138,  164.  192 

Michener.  C.  D 54 

Middle  America 29 

Miridae 105 

Mississippi  River 2 

Mississippi,  USA 160 

Mites  of  Greenhouses  (Book  Review) 58 

Montopoli,  C.  E 298 

Murray- Aaron,  E 1 

Mushet,  D.M 235 

Myasis  291 

Mydrosoma 54 

Nardi,  G ,...56 

Narrow  crawl  space  284 

Nascimento  Santos,  C 291 

Natural  Enemies  (Book  Review) 120 

Navarrete-Heredia.  J.  L 81 

Nemouridae 160 

Neotrichia 164 

Neotrichiini 164 

Neotropical 86 

Neotropics 217 

Nepal ...271 

Nepalomyia 275 

New  country  record 235 

New  county  record 224 

New  record 47,  187,  230,  260 

New  species 41.  75.  121.  156.  164.  181,  187, 

192,271,275 

New  state  record 224,  233 

Nguyen,  Y.  T back  cover  (5) 

Nitidulidae 81 

Non-chemical  control 284 

North  America....  ...181 


300 


ENTOMOLOGICAL  NEWS 


North  Carolina,  U.S.A 33,  246 

North  Dakota,  U  S.A 289 

Northern  Argentina 156 

Northern  Belize 164 

Northern  Rockies,  Canada back  cover  (2) 

Nuisance  biters 21 1 

Nymphalidae 91 

Odonata 233 

Ohio,  U.S.A 255 

Oklahoma,  U.S.A 2 

Orthocladiinae 1 1  7 

Orthoptera 129,  197 

Otocnptops  gracilis  berkeleyensis 57 

Overwintering  mortality 23 

Oxycnemus 81 

Pacific  Islands 121 

Padron,  M back  cover  (5) 

Paracloeodes 33 

Parasitoid 192 

Parnassius back  cover  (2) 

Pereira,  R.S.S 152 

Peristenus  digoimttis 105 

Phaedon 75 

Phalacrosoma 271 

Phaneropterinae 129 

Phyllocnistis  citrella 98 

Physoconopus 86 

Platt,A.P 91 

Plecoptera 51,  160,  224,  289 

Pleuroloma  fhivipes 2 

Pollinating  fig  wasps 152 

Polydesmida 2 

Population  genetics back  cover  (2) 

Post-reproductive  mortality 61 

Prado,  A.P 152 

Predation 211 

Predator  avoidance 1 13 

Prostoia  completa 160 

Prudencio,  N back  cover  (5) 

Psilopyga 81 

Pteroptrix  fidalgoi 10 

Purrington,  F.F 113 

Pygmy  Snowfly 289 

Qiao,  G 260 

Quality  Control  and  Production  of  Biological 

Control  Agents  (Book  review) 237 

Reproduction  7 

Reuse  of  nests 241 

Reyes-Castillo,  P 138 

Robbins,  R.K 238 

Romig,  R.F 105 

Rourt,  K back  cover  (5) 

Sadlowski,  B 180 

Saigusa,  T 271 

Sanchez,  A back  cover  (5) 

Sanchez,  J back  cover  (5) 

Santiago-Blay,  J.A 1,  60,  120,  288,  294,  298 

Schaefcr,  C.W 211 

Schaefcr,  P.W 23 

Schappert,  P 179 

Scolopendromorpha 57 

Scolopocryptopidae 57 

Scolopocryptops  gracilis  Wood 57 

Sevgili,  H 129 

Shaffer,  S.  C 288,  294 

Sheldon,  .1 back  cover  (4) 

Shelley.  R.M 2,57 

Shipsn  niliiiiiln 1  60 

Sinopla  perpunctatus 147 


Smith,  S.B 2 

Society  Meeting  (October  23,  2002) 120 

Society  Meeting  (March  23,  2003) 239 

Society  Meeting  (October  22,  2003) 240 

Society  Meeting  (November  19,  2003 (back  cover  (4) 

South  America 181 

South  Carolina,  U.S.A 233 

Southern  Mexico 164 

Species  richness  estimation 246 

Sphecidae 241 

Spinelli,  G.R 156 

Stagetus  coin-mis  White 56 

Stanczak,  M 205 

Stark,  B.P 160 

Statement  of  ownership,  management,  and 

circulation  293 

Stoneflies 224 

Stridulate 197 

Stylngaxtcr 86 

Synonyms 217 

Syrphidae 217 

Taber.  S.  W 179 

Tamarix 260 

Tarter,  D.C 224 

Taxonomy 192 

Tempisquitoneura 1 17 

Tennessee,  U.S.A 246 

Territoriality 197 

Tettigoniidae 129 

Texas,  U.S.A 2 

The  Genus  Adelpha  (Book  Review) 238 

The  Passionate  Obsen'er 288 

Thompson,  F.C 217 

Three-segmented  tarsi 10 

Tilmon,  K.J 105 

Tingidae 29 

Tomocerina 41,  47 

Tomocerinae 41,  47 

Tonwcerus  baicalensis 47 

Tomocerus  Collembola 41 

Triacaiitlnigyna  trifeda 233 

Triapitsyn,  S.V 10,  192 

Trichoptera 164,  255 

Tricorythodinae 37 

Trjapitzin,  V.A 192 

Tr\'/>i>.\v/on  politum 241 

Turkey 129,  187 

Van  Lenteren.  J.C 237 

Vegetation  management  techniques 205 

Walton,  W.E 205 

Webb,  J.M 230 

Western  North  America 197 

Wetlands 205 

Whalen,  J 59 

Wiersema,  N.A 37.  55 

Willmott,  R.R 238 

Winter  aggregate 23 

Xysdodesmidae 2 

Yang,  D 271.  275,  279 

Yang,  X-K 75 

Zhang,  G 260 

Zhang,  L 279 

Zhang,  Z-Q 58 

Zodi/tn 86 

Suzanne  Mclntire,  Carmen  Monlopoli,  Judith  Barr, 
Suzanne  C.  Shaffer,  and  Jorge  A.  Santiago-Bias 

Addresses  in  Acknowledgments 


Reviewers.  When  submitting  papers,  all  authors  are  requested  to  provide  the  names  of  two  qual- 
ified individuals  who  have  critically  reviewed  the  manuscript  before  it  is  submitted  to  Entomological 
News.  The  receipt  of  all  papers  will  be  acknowledged  and,  if  accepted,  they  will  be  published  as  soon 
as  possible. 

All  papers,  except  book  reviews,  are  forwarded  to  experts  for  final  review  before  acceptance.  In 
order  to  expedite  the  review  process,  authors  are  also  asked  to  suggest  the  name,  address,  email,  tele- 
phone and  fax  of  at  least  three  experts  in  the  subject  field  to  whom  the  manuscript  may  be  forward- 
ed for  additional  review.  Ideally,  the  review  process  should  be  completed  within  30  days.  The  editor 
reserves  his  prerogative  of  sending  the  manuscript  to  other  reviewers.  Authors  are  also  welcome  to 
list  the  names  of  reviewers  to  whom  the  article  should  not  be  sent,  with  a  brief  explanation. 

Upon  return  of  reviews,  authors  will  be  asked  to  modify  or  rewrite  their  texts  to  accommodate 
suggestions  of  the  reviewers  and  the  editor  as  well  as  to  conform  to  requirements  of  Entomological 
News.  If  authors  do  not  modify  their  texts,  they  should  specifically  address,  on  a  point  by  point  basis, 
why  they  are  not  doing  that. 

Page  Proofs.  The  printer  will  send  page  proofs  to  the  editor  and  the  business  manager.  Faith 
Kuehn.  Then,  the  proofs  will  be  sent  to  the  corresponding  author  as  .pdf  files,  together  with  the 
reprint  order  form  as  an  .rtf  file.  Authors  must  process  proofs  and  return  them  to  the  editor  and  to  the 
business  editor  by  air  mail  or  e-mail  (attachment).  Authors  who  anticipate  being  absent  are  urged  to 
provide  forwarding  addresses  or  to  provide  temporary  addresses  (with  dates).  Proofs  not  approved 
within  one  week  will  be  published  as  is.  The  editor  will  collect  the  page  proofs  and  send  them  to  the 
printer. 

Page  and  Reprint  Charges.  Charges  for  publication  in  Entomological  News  are  US$25.00  per 
printed  page  (or  part)  for  members  and  US$30.00  per  printed  page  (or  part)  for  nonmembers.  Authors 
will  be  charged  for  all  text  figures  and  halftones  at  the  rate  of  US$30.00  each,  regardless  of  size. 
These  charges  were  approved  by  the  American  Entomological  Society  Council  for  the  2003-2004 
United  States  Fiscal  year.  Authors  will  pay  for  color  printing  at  the  going  rate.  There  are  no  discounts. 
There  are  no  page  charges  for  book  reviews.  Page  and  reprint  charges  will  be  billed  by  Faith  Kuehn. 
to  whom  communications  and  remittances  of  page  charges  and  reprints  should  be  sent.  FK  address 
is:  3789  Foulk  Road,  Boothwyn,  Pennsylvania  19061  U.S.A.  E-mail:  fbkuehn@yahoo.com. 

Articles  longer  than  20  printed  pages  of  Entomological  News  may  be  published  in  two  or  more 
installments,  unless  the  author  is  willing  to  pay  the  entire  cost  of  a  sufficient  number  of  additional 
pages  in  any  one  issue  to  enable  such  an  article  to  appear  without  division. 

If  hard  copy  reprints  are  desired,  they  must  be  ordered  together  with  the  proofs.  Reprints  as  .pdf 
files  are  available  for  the  authors.  For  options  and  charges,  contact  the  business  manager. 

Entomological  News  is  printed  by  Dover  Litho  Printing  Company,  1211  North  DuPont  Highway, 
Dover,  Delaware  19901  U.S.A.  Telephone  (302)  678-121 1;  fax:  (302)  678-8091;  toll-free  telephone 
(800)366-9132;  Web  Page:  www.doverlitho.com.  Dover  Litho  has  been  recognized  by  DENREC  and 
DELRAP  Green  Industries  as  "The  Most  Environmentally  Conscious  Printer  in  the  State  of  Dela- 
ware." 

Entomological  News  is  available  in  microform  from  ProQuest  Information  and  Learning.  Call 
toll-free  (800)  521-3042,  (800)  521-0600,  (734)  761-4700.  Mail  inquiry  to:  ProQuest  Information 
and  Learning,  300  North  Zeeb  Road,  Ann  Arbor.  Michigan  48106-9866  U.S.A. 

Entomological  News  is  listed  in  the  Science  Citation  Index  Expanded. 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


3  9088  01075  5213          OOK  REVIEW 


Cricket  Boy:  A  Chinese  Tale  Retold  by  Feenie  Ziner.  Illustrated  by  Ed  Young. 
Double  Day  and  Company,  Inc.  Garden  City,  New  York,  USA.  47  pages.  Hard  Cover 
US$6.95. 


Cricket  Boy:  A  Chinese  Tale  Retold  takes  place  in  Yung  Ping,  China.  Scholar  Hu  is  a  single  father  who 
works  hard  on  his  education  in  spite  of  poverty.  He  has  a  son  named  Hu  Sing  who  works  in  the  fields  to 
support  the  family,  plays  with  crickets,  and  feels  uninspired  by  books.  To  understand  his  son  more.  Scholar 
Hu  decides  to  take  interest  in  crickets.  His  time  with  Hu  Sing  and  the  crickets  made  him  question  the  nature 
of  animals  and  humans.  Scholar  Hu  asks:  "Is  there  not  as  great  as  a  mystery  in  the  life  of  a  cricket  as  there 
is  in  the  life  of  a  Man?  How  is  it  that  some  crickets  are  naturally  shy,  and  others  are  born  fighters?  What 
happens  to  the  spirit  of  a  cricket  when  the  summer  ends,  and  its  body  dies?"  I  like  the  way  the  author  made 
connections  between  humans  and  nature.  (DA) 

Little  things  could  be  strong.  This  is  a  story  about  a  boy  who  had  a  cricket  that  inspired  him  to  do  bet- 
ter. It  gave  the  boy  skills  to  carve  a  tickling  rod  and  determination  to  have  the  best  crickets  in  the  kingdom. 
The  boy  works  very  hard  with  his  father  to  collect  the  best  crickets  and  train  them  to  be  smart  fighters.  The 
story  also  questions  the  soul  of  a  cricket.  Are  animals  like  us?  Is  there  a  cricket  heaven?  It  doesn't  matter 
what  you  believe,  the  story  is  still  very  good  to  read!  (NP) 

The  book  has  many  lessons  like  if  you  find  a  loud  chirping  cricket  (or  person),  it  doesn't  always  mean 
that  it  is  the  best:  "The  loudest  chirper  often  sings  only  to  keep  his  courage  up.  Listen,  instead,  for  the  quiet 
fellows.  There  you  will  find  true  pride."  The  quote  is  like  "Still  waters  run  deep.  Babbling  brooks  are  shal- 
low." There  are  lots  of  other  lessons  that  are  good  for  character  improvement  at  all  ages.  (KR) 

I  liked  this  story  because  it  shows  us  how  to  be  brave.  Scholar  Hu  lived  and  brought  fame  to  the  city 
of  Yung  Ping  even  when  he  was  very  sad  about  his  son's  death.  Although  the  relationship  between  the 
father  and  son  was  over,  Hu  Sing  did  not  really  die  forever.  By  turning  into  a  cricket  to  fight  against  the 
Emperor's  cricket  champion,  Hu  Sing's  spirit  lives.  (EM) 

Cricket  Boy:  A  Chinese  Tale  Retold  makes  you  think  a  lot.  The  father,  Scholar  Hu,  gives  his  son,  Hu 
Sing,  a  lot  of  advice  from  what  he  has  learned  from  books  that  can  be  used  to  understand  the  similarities 
between  animals  and  humans.  Scholar  Hu  advises  Hu  Sing  on  how  to  catch  a  cricket  and  question  the  spir- 
it of  the  cricket.  Also,  Hu  Sing  himself  turns  into  a  cricket.  These  things  show  us  how  close  we  are  con- 
nected to  nature.  If  you  are  curious  about  how  animals  and  humans  are  related,  you  should  read  this  book. 
Plus,  it  is  also  good  to  see  life  differently.  (JS) 

This  is  a  book  about  a  boy  who  cares  for  his  crickets  and  the  love  between  a  father  and  his  son.  They 
get  together  and  collect  the  best  crickets.  Their  love  is  so  much  that  the  son,  Hu  Sing,  came  back  as  a  crick- 
et after  he  accidentally  kills  their  prized  cricket,  Black  Dragon.  Black  Dragon  was  going  to  fight  the 
Emperor's  champion.  His  father.  Scholar  Hu,  did  not  know  that  the  cricket  that  beat  the  Emperor's  crick- 
et was  Hu  Sing  until  he  came  back  to  the  village  and  woke  up  from  his  death  to  tell  his  father.  Hu  Sing  had 
a  dream  of  battling  against  the  Emperor's  generals.  I  think  that  the  love  in  this  story  shows  us  that  it  can 
give  us  the  courage  to  do  anything.  (AS) 

I  like  this  tale  because  it  shows  character  and  feelings.  I  was  shocked  to  find  out  that  Hu  Sing  dies  in 
the  middle  of  the  story.  However,  when  he  is  reincarnated  into  a  cricket  and  defeats  the  Emperor's  cricket 
champion,  I  thought  it  was  very  magical.  It  is  like  when  you  have  a  dream  or  passion  about  something  that 
you  cannot  let  go  of  even  when  you  pass  away.  I  want  everybody  to  read  this  and  see  a  different  kind  of 
life  from  us  here  in  America.  (TB) 

Cricket  Boy:  A  Chinese  Tale  Retold  shows  that  we  can  learn  a  lot  about  ourselves  by  watching  animals. 
Animals  can  sometime  resemble  us:  "...  for  the  catcher  of  crickets  must  be  silent  and  swift,  and  not  be  too 
proud  to  kneel  before  the  smallest  creature".  I  think  kings,  queens,  and  presidents  should  think  about  this. 
It  teaches  us  that  no  one  is  better  than  others.  (MP) 

Students'  artwork  can  be  seen  at:  http://geocities.com/entomologicalnews/archives.htm. 

Dominique  Atwell,  Tiffany  Brown,  Erika  Mendoza,  Marlon  Padron,  Nallely  Prudencio, 

Kimberley  Routt,  Ana  Sanchez,  Jennifer  Sanchez,  other  5th  &  6th  graders,  and  Yen  T.  Nguyen 

John  F.  Kennedy  Elementary  School,  Houston  Independent  School  District 

Houston.  Texas  77022  U.S.A. 
E-mail:  yentnguyenl  1  l@yahoo.com. 

76315386  10 

18/11/86  i 


SMITHSONIAN  INSTITUTION  LIBRARIES 


3908801291  6912