Skip to main content

Full text of "Eulogy on the life and character of the Hon. Thomas J. Rusk, late U. S. senator from Texas. Delivered in the hall of the House of Representatives of the state of Texas, on the seventh of November, 1857"

See other formats


F 
383 


^^^^^.A  '.y,.-^ 


c^^y. 


^^^^.>r  ^1^ 


III!      I  •  Pmi    I    lilll'WIM  tfBI    tMI^I— IIWilMIMf  will  ■!<■■ 


EULOGY 


LIFE  a:sd   CHAEACTER 


HON.  THOMAS  J.  RUSK. 


31.y?k.TE  TJ.  S.  SEKT-A-TO^l  FPIOIIN^  TE^CA-S. 


DBLIVERED     IN     THB 


i.l;ill  of  ll]c  foust  0f  gc^xestntatibts  0f  tk  State  0f  %%u%, 

ON  THE  SEVENTH  OP  NOVEMBER,  1857. 

BY  JOPiN  HEMPHILL. 


„-*,,,„ -.-^.^ 


FriRted  By  Order  of  the  House  of  Represenjalives  of  the  7th  Legislature  of  Texas 


AUSTIN: 


/ 


PRINTED    BY    JOHN    MARSHALL    &    CO.,!  STATE    PRINTERS. 

18.o7. 


IL^ 


Class        3  b 


^^ 


Book .1R  ^ 


EULOGY 


LIFE  AND   CHARACTER 


//7 


i^ 


Wg     Ll 


lUMil 


T 


"^' 


L^^TE  XJ.  S.  SElSr^A-TOH  FPIOIVE  TESZ-A^S. 


DEI,  IVBRBD     IN    THK 


all  0f  tk  louse  ^f  lUBrcsculatibts  ^f  tk  ^^t;itc  jof  Imx$, 


ON  THE  SEVENTH  OF  NOVEMBER,  1857. 


BY  JOHN  HEMPHILL. 


Printed  Ey  Orier  of  the  House  of  Rep'eseniatives  of  the  7tii  Legislilore  of  Texas, 


AUSTIN: 

PRINTED    BY    JOHN    MAESHALL    &    CO.,    STATE    TEINTEES. 

1857. 


rs 


Austin,  9th  Nov.,  1857.     - 

Dear  Sir  : — In  obedience  to  a  resolution  passed  by  tbe 
House  of  KeiDresentatives  of  the  Seventh  Legislature  of  the 
State  of  Texas,  the  undersigned  committee,  appointed  for  that 
purpose,  beg  leave  to  request  for  publication,  a  copy  of  the 
eulogy  on  the  life  and  character  of  the  late  General  Thomas 
J.  Rusk,  delivered  by  you  in  the  Representative  Hall,  on  the 
7th  inst. 

With  considerations  of  the  highest  esteem,  we  subscribe 
ourselves, 

Yours  truly  and  respectfully, 

JACOB  W.ELDER, 
JOHN  HENRY  BROWN, 
THOS.  J.  JOHNSON, 

Committee. 
Hon.  John  Hemphill. 


Austin,  Nov.  lltli,  1857. 

Gentlemen  : — I  have  just  received  your  note  requesting, 
in  obedience  to  a  resolution  of  the  House  of  Representatives, 
a  copy,  for  publication,  of  the  eulogy  delivered  by  me  on  the 
life  and  character  of  the  late  General  Thomas  J.  Rusk. 

In  compliance  with  your  request,  I  herewith  forward  you 
a  copy,  and  have  the  honor,  with  sentiments  of  the  highest 
esteem,  to  subscribe  myself. 

Very  respectfully. 

Your  most  obedient  servant, 

JOHN  HEMPHILL. 

Hons.  Jacob  Wilder,  John  Henry   Brown,   Thomas  J. 
Johnson,  Commiitee. 


EULOaY. 


Fellow-Citizens  : 

We  are  assembled  to  lament  the  death,  and  render  homage 
to  the  memory  of  one  of  our  most  illustrious  patriots,  one  who 
was  among  the  first,  if  not  the  foremost,  in  the  hearts  of  his 
countrymen.  Thomas  J.  Rusk  the  warrior,  the  statesman, 
the  idolized  of  Texas,  is  no  more. 

That  magnificent  form,  where  "every  god  did  seem  to  set 
his  seal,"  has  been  consigned  to  the  dust.  The  eye  which 
beamed  with  intellect  and  with  benevolence,  has  lost  its  bright- 
ness. The  tongue  which  uttered  words  of  wisdom  is  silent. 
No  more  shall  his  noble  presence  cheer  with  its  animating 
influence,  or  inspire  confidence,  love  and  aifection.  He  is  dead. 
His  work  is  finished  on  the  earth.  Well  may  we  exclaim  with 
the  pathetic  lamentation  of  the  mourner  in  Israel:  "Hoav 
are  the  mighty  fallen ! "  But  though  dead,  he  still  lives  in 
our  memories  and  in  the  gratitude  of  his  country.  His  name 
is  identified  with  some  of  the  most  important  events  of  the 
-v^c  present  century,  nay  i$L  the  history  of  human  Liberty — events 
which  have  exerted,  and  will  continue  to  exert,  a  wide  influence 
over  the  affairs  of  men,  and  the  destinies  of  this  hemisphere. 

The  voice  of  grief  or  eulogy  cannot  reach  him — but  we  may, 
with  advantage  to  ourselves,  contemplate  his  character,  life, 
and  actions ;  and  the  brightest  tribute  that  we  can  pay  him 
will  be  the  affectionate  rememberance  of  his  deeds — attachment 


to  his  principles — and  imitation  of  the  hright  and  noble  quali- 
ties of  his  example. 

TnoMAS  J.  EusK  was  born  of  John  and  Mary  Husk,  in 
Pendleton  District,  South  Carolina,  on  the  5th  Dec,  1803. 

His  father,  who  had  emigrated  from  Ireland,  was  an  honest 
and  industrious  stone-mason.  His  parents  were  poor  and 
unable  to  give  him  the  advantage  of  a  collegiate  or  liberal 
e.lucation. 

At  an  early  age  he  evinced  a  love  for  books,  which  was 
greatly  increased  under  the  influence  and  encouragement  of 
his  mother,  a  woman  of  i)icty  and  good  sense,  to  whom  he  was 
in  the  habit  of  reading  especially  the  Holy  Scriptures. 

His  fine  capacity  and  his  thirst  for  knowledge  early  attracted 
the  attention  of  Mr.  Caliioun,  (then  in  the  commencement  of 
his  bright  career,)  who  took  an  interest  in  the  boy,  encouraging 
him  with  his  advice,  and  assisting  him  with  the  h);!n  of  books. 
These  words  of  kindness  and  encouragement  sank  deep  into 
the  heart  of  the  youth,  and  often  afterwards,  (as  beautifully 
expressed  by  Mr.  Rusk  in  his  remarks  upon  the  death  of  Mr. 
Calhoun,)  a  recurrence,  under  the  most  critical  circumstances, 
to  those  words  inspired  him  with  resolution  to  meet  the  diffi- 
culties that  beset  his  path.  The  friendly  relations  then  formed 
continued  through  the  life  of  Mr.  Calhoun,  and  the  kind 
feelings  which  so  impressed  the  youth  were  long  years  after- 
wards manifested  by  the  veteran  statesman,  on  the  last  day 
in  which,  with  a  body  worn  down  with  disease,  he  occupied 
his  seat  in  the  Senate  Chamber.  At  a  suitable  age,  Mr.  Rusk 
commenced  reading  law  in  the  office  of  Wm.  Grisliam,  for 
many  years  Clerk  of  the  Pendleton  District  Court,  earning  his 
livelihood  at  the  same  time  as  a  Clerk  in  a  merchant's  store. 
In  1825  or  6,  he  removed  to  Habersham  county,  Georgia.  In 
1827,  he  married  Mary  P.,  the  daughter  of  Col  Cleaveland, 
one  of  the  leading  men  in  that  section  of  the  State.  He  was 
engaged  in  merchandize  until  1833 — and  having  shortly  after 
his  removal  to  Georgia  been  admitted  to  the  practice  of  the 


law,  he  entered  upon  an  extensive  and  lucrative  professional 
business,  having  a  high  standing  among  a  Bar  eminent  for 
professional  ability.  Unfortunately  the  spirit  of  speculation 
was  rife  in  the  "Gold  Region  of  G-eorgia/'  and  he  became 
largely  interested  in  the  stock  of  a  mining  company,  the 
managers  of  which,  proving  faithless,  absconded  v\dth  the  pro- 
perty of  the  company — leaving  him  with  others  in  poverty 
and  debt.  He  pursued  them  to  Texas,  in  the  winter  of  1834- 
35,  but  overtook  them  only  to  find  that  the  effects  had  been 
squandered  and  lost. 

He  did  not,  when  he  visited  Texas,  intend  to  reside  here 
permanently.  But  he  saw  that  a  fine  field  was  opened  in  this 
rising  country,  in  which  by  energy,  industry,  and  enterprize, 
he  might  repair  his  shattered  fortunes.  He  saw  also  that  the 
toils  of  despotism  were  gathering  around  the  jDCople  of  Texas. 
That  their  Just  claim,  under  the  organic  act  of  May  7th, 
1824,  to  admission  as  a  separate  State  of  the  Mexican  Confe- 
deracy, had  been  disregarded ;  their  Commissioner,  Stephen 
F.  Austin,  (to  present  their  memorial  for  admission  as  a  State) 
imprisoned ;  the  federal  form  itself  of  the  government  threat- 
ened with  overthrow,  to  be  succeeded  by  a  central  military 
and  priestly  despotism.  That  the  violence  whicli  had  for 
years  afflicted  the  interior  of  Mexico  with  such  deplorable 
calamities,  prostrating  its  free  institutions  and  its  legitimate 
authorities — and  consigning  the  friends  of  the  Constitution 
and  of  freedom  to  the  dungeon  or  to  exile,  would  most  prob- 
ably, or  rather  inevitably,  extend  to  Texas,  hitherto  exempted 
by  the  remoteness  of  its  situation — and,  in  fine,  such  was  the 
alarming  progress  of  usurpation  and  oppression,  that  war 
would  ultimately  be  the  only  remedy  by  vv^hich  the  people  of 
Texas  could  save  themselves  and  their  liberties  from  total 
destruction — and  with  that  generosity  of  spirit  and  devotion 
to  freedom,  which  shed  such  warmth  and  brilliancy  of  lustre 
over  the  character  and  acts  of  the  subject  of  this  eulogy,  he 
determined  to  remain,  and  offer  his  services  and  his  life  to  the 
coming  struggle.     Nor  was  he  mistaken  in  his  apprehensions 


that  the  people  would  finully  be  compelled  to  resort  to  arms 
in  defence  of  then-  liberties. 

The  political  action  of  the  Mexican  authorities,  aL  every 
successive  step,  evinced  a  determination  to  overthrow,  without 
even  the  call  of  a  Constituent  Congress,  and  in  disregard  of 
the  provisions  (especially  of  the  171st  art.)  of  the  Constitu- 
tion of  1824,  the  federal  form  of  government,  and  establish  .a 
central  despotism  on  its  ruins.     In  the  course  of  these  arl)itrary 
proceedings,  and  without  referring  to  those  of  a  date  anterior 
to  the  arrival  of  Gen.  Rusk  in  Texas,  the  Vi(ie-President, 
Gomez  Farias,  a  Republican  in  principle,  but  an  enemy  to  the 
despotic  rule  of  the  Priesthood  and  of  the  military,  v,-as  early 
in  the  year  1835  deposed  without  impeachment  or  trial.     On 
the  thirty-first  day  of  March,  1836,  by  decree  of  the  Mexican 
Cong-ress,  the  civic  militia  Y\-as  ordered  to  be  reduced  to  one  for 
every  five  hundred  inhabitants,  and  the  remainder  disarmed  ; 
an  enormity  of  despotism  sufficient  in  itself  to  have  justified 
a  revolution.     On  the  twentj^-second  of  April,  1835,  the  Con- 
gress of  Coahuila  and  Texas  protested  energetically  against 
the  proposed  violeirt  reforms  of  the  Government.     That  tliey 
were  especially  dangerous  for  Coahuila  and  Texas,  bordering 
as  she  did  on  a  powerful  Republic — a  considerable  portion  of 
its  territory  settled  by  inhabitants  whom  changes  did  not  suit, 
and  who  could  not  conform  to  such  inconstancy  in  the  most 
essential  acts  of  the  public  administration,  and  that  the  State 
would  recognize  no  other  amendments  than  those  made  ac- 
cording to  the  forms  of  the  Constitution.     The  State  also,  at 
the  same  time,  protested  against  the  Decree  disbanding  and 
disarming  the  militia.     These  jirotests  were  wholly  disregar- 
ded.    On  the  second  of  May,  1835,  the  National  Congress 
passed  an  act  of  general  amnesty  for  political  ofienccs  since 
1821,  excluding   (against  the  remonstrance  of  the  State  of 
Coahuila  and  Texas)  persons  not.  born  in  the  Republic,  who 
had  participated  since  the  first  of  May,  1834,  in  "the  political 
disturbances  of  the  country.     Thus  proscribing  and  excluding 
Texans  (who  were  principally  foreigners)  from  the  benefit  of 
the  Decree. 


Several  of  tlie  Southern  States  of  Mexico  were  opposed  to 
the  revolutionary  proceedings  of  the  Centralists ;  but  they 
were  silenced,  or  were  too  weak  to  offer  formidable  resistance. 
The  State  of  Zacatecas  which  had  often  "curbed  despotism 
and  the  abuse  of  power,"  protested  against  the  usurpations  of 
the  National  authorities — refused  to  disband  its  militia  and 
had  recourse  to  arms,  to  protect  its  sovereign  rights  as  a  State. 
But  her  array,  on  the  eleventh  of  May,  1835,  was  defeated 
with  immense  slaughter.  Her  fine  Capital,  with  all  its  wealth, 
given  up  to  unbridle  J  pillage,  and  her  noble  sons  hewn  down 
with  merciless  butchery.  The  heroic  etibrt  of  this  gallant 
State  was  quenched  in  blood,  and  her  people  reduced  to  un- 
conditional submission.  The  State  of  Coahuila  and  Texas 
was  left  alone  to  to  uphold  the  Constitution  of  1824.  But  the 
authorities  of  the  State  had  become  so  unpopular  in  Texas 
from  their  wasteful  expenditure  of  the  public  lands,  that  the 
energetic  appeals  to  the  Texians  by  the  Executive  of  the  State 
to  arouse  themselves,  for  their  property,  liberty  and  lives  de- 
pended upon  the  capricious  will  of  their  direst  enemies,  were, 
for  the  time,  disregarded.  The  Executive  was  subsequently 
arrested,  the  Legislature  dispersed,  and  the  province  of  Coa- 
huila finally  subjected  to  military  government.  The  storm 
was  now  rapidly  approaching  Texas,  the  only  portion  of  the 
Republic  of  Mexico  that  had  not  been  subjugated.  It  became 
apparent  that  the  Federal  Constitution  would  be  destroyed. 
The  patriot  Zavala,  and  some  of  our  own  eminent  citizens  were 
proscribed,  and  orders  sent  for  their  arrest  and  transfer  to  the 
interior ;  to  be  given  up,  in  effect,  to  military  execution.  It 
was  proclaimed  that  the  Texians  must  obey  the  constitution 
governing  the  Mexicans,  no  matter  on  what  principles  it  may 
be  founded.  In  the  despatch  to  the  Governors  and  Political 
Chiefs,  of  the  thirty-first  August,  the  National  Executive  re- 
gards Texas  as  then  in  armed  rebellion,  and  declares  that  he 
had  taken  the  most  active  measures  to  chastise  the  ungrateful 
foreigners.  Troops  were  now  introduced  into  Texas  under  va- 
rious pretences.  The  Colonists,  though  they  had,  as  well  from 
inclination  as  interest,  been  hitherto  diposed  to  peace,  were 


10 

not  the  men  to  tamely  surrencler  rlj^hts  secured  by  so  many 
guarantees,  or  be  driven  from  the  country  in  Avhich  tlioj^  had 
settled  by  invitation  from  the  Government,  and  which  they, 
by  their  unaided  toils  and  efforts,  had  reclaimed  irom  the 
savage  and  emljellibhed  with  the  ini|)n)vements  of  civilization. 

There  was  no  alternative  left  but  a  resort  to  arms ;  and  at 
length  the  torch  was  ap].)lied  to  the  intlannnable  materials  and 
the  flame  of  war  spread  throughout  the  land. 

A  piece  of  artillery  was  demanded  by  the  Mexican  Com- 
mandant of  San  Antonio  from  the  town  of  Gonzales,  and  a 
body  of  Cavalry  sent  to  enforce  the  demand.  This  was  re- 
sisted. Volunteers  rushed  furw;u\l  to  sup})ort  the  gallant  cit- 
izens of  that  town  and  vicinity  ;  and  on  the  first  day  of  Octo- 
ber, 1835,  the  first  battle  was  fought  by  Texas,  and  the  first 
victory  gained  in  the  c<uisc  of  Liberty,  of  State  sovereignty, 
and  of  tlie  Constitution  of"  1824. 

In  the  mean  time,  and  before  any  thing  had  been  done  or 
resolved  upon,  Gen.  Eusk,  in  anticipation  of  events,  had 
raised  a  Company  at  Nacogdoches,  which  was  drilled  by  him 
into  a  state  of  great  efficiency,  and  with  which,  or  a  portion 
of  which,  he,  on  the  first  news  of  the  atteni])!  at  disarming, 
repaired  to  the  army  in  the  West — then  under  the  connnand 
of  General  Stephen  F.  Austin.  It  was  here  that  General 
Eusk  first  became  acquainted  with  this  great  and  good  man, 
so  eminently  entitled,  from  his  extraordinary  services  and  ex- 
alted intellectual  and  moral  qualities,  to  the  appellation  of 
Father  of  his  country.  To  him,  Gen.  Eusk  became  much 
attached,  and  in  his  own  language,  ho  regarded  him  as  the 
purest  patriot  and  the  best  man  he  ever  knew.  The  military 
qualities  of  Gen.  Eusk,  though  a  stranger,  were  appreciated, 
and  he  was  placed  on  the  Staff  of  the  Commanding  General. 
His  force  of  character  and  intellect  had  their  just  influence — 
and  as  occasions  offered,  he  exhibited  his  characteristic  bold- 
ness and  intrepidity;  and  especially  in  his  daring  attempt,  at 
the  head  of  forty  Cavalry,  to  draw  the  enemy  from  their  en- 
trenchments.    After  the  first  successes  at  San  Antonio,  he 


11 

returned  to  the  Seat  of  Government  at  San  Felipe ;  and  on 
the  tenth  December  was  appointed  by  the  Council  to  proceed 
East  of  the  Triuity  to  procure  reinforcements  and  supplies  to 
aid  in  the  reduction  of  the  City  of  San  Antonio,  and  though 
that  City,  after  a  continuous  assault  of  five  days  in  its  honses 
and  streets,  had,  with  all  the  hostile  forces,  surrendered  on  the 
day  this  a})pointment  was  made,  yet  the  men  and  munitions 
collected  were  of  valuable  assistance  in  the  futnre  operations 
of  the  army.  He,  with  others,  was  elected  from  Nacogdoches 
as  a  Delegate  to  the  Convention  to  assemble  at  Washington 
on  the  first  of  March,  1836.  The  great  question  in  the  can- 
vass had  been,  whether  Texas  should  declare  her  entire  Na- 
tional Independence,  or  adhere,  as  by  the  Declaration  of  the 
seventh  November,  to  the  Kepublican  principles  of  the  Con- 
stitution of  1824.  The  considerations  which  induced  the  Con- 
sultation to  decline  the  assertion  of  absolute  Independence 
and  total  separation  from  Mexico,  had  now,  in  the  opinion  of 
a  great  majority,  lost  their  force.  The  Consitution  of  1824 
had  been  absolutely  abolished,  and  the  States  reduced  to  De- 
partments. There  were  ardent  and  enlightened  lovers  of  lib- 
erty in  Mexico — but  they  w^ere  powerless.  The  mass  of  the 
Nation  was  against  us,  having  been  ftilsely  induced  to  believe 
that  our  only  object  was,  and  had  been,  the  dismemberment 
of  the  Mexican  Territory.  The  war  on  the  i)art  of  Mexico, 
as  againt  Texas,  was  no  party  war — for  or  against  this  or 
that  form  of  Gov^ernment,  but  was  national — was  to  chastise 
or  exterminate  those  denounced  by  them  as  "foreign  robbers." 
The  war  on  our  part  could  be  no  longer  to  sustain  a  party  in 
Mexico,  or  for  a  form  of  Mexican  Government — but  for  self- 
preservation — for  Independence,  and  for  a  Government  of  our 
own,  adapted  to  our  wants  and  circumstances.  The  sentiment 
in  favor  of  unconditional  Independence  had  become  general ; 
and  accordingly,  on  the  second  day  of  the  session,  viz :  the 
second  of  March,  1836,  the  Convention  unanimously  declared 
Texas  to  be  a  free,  sovereign  and  independent  Republic,  and 
that  its  political  connection  witn  the  Mexican  nation  had 
forever  ended. 


12 

The  circumstances  under  wliicli  this  declaration  was  made 
were  perilous  in  the  extreme. 

.  Saata  Anna,  with  his  immense  hosts,  had  invested  the 
Alamo.  In  a  few  days  this  was  taken,  and  its  brave  defenders 
put  to  the  sword.  There  were  rumors  of  the  approach  ol  the 
enem}'-,  and  the  Constitution,  (one  of  the  best  ever  penned,) 
was  hastily  thrown  together,  and  on  the  16th  March,  the  Con- 
vention adjourned.  The  ability  of  Gen.  Ru«k  in  debate,  his 
sound  jud^jjment  and  conservative  principles  and  influence  had 
great  weight  in  the  convention,  and  some  of  the  principal  fea- 
tures of  the  constitution  are  attributable  to  his  agency.  So 
high  was  the  estimate  of  his  woith,  and  his  capacity  to  meet 
the  awful  exigency  then  threatening  the  country  with  speedy 
and  overwhelming  ruin,  that  he  was  by  the  convention  una- 
nimously el.^cted  Secretary  of  War  of  the  government,  ad  in- 
terim— by  far  the  most  important  offlce  in  the  cabinet — war 
being  the  instant,  the  jiressing,  the  almost  exclusive  business 
of  the  j)eople  and  of  the  government.  He  immediately  adopted 
the  most  energetic  measures  to  suj^press  alnrms  and  to  arouse 
and  stimulate  the  people — and  to  concentrate  the  force,  the 
arms,  and  the  supplies  of  the  country  to  its  defence. 

On  the  17th  of  March  the  government  removed  from  Wash- 
ington to  Harrisburg.  On  the  thirtv-first  of  March,  General 
Ru.^K  issued  a  strong  appeal  to  the  people  to  march  to  the 
defence  of  their  country.  On  the  next  diy  he  left  for  the 
army  which  he  reached  on  the  fourth  April,  most  cordially 
welcomed  by  the  Commander-in-Chief,  and  by  the  whole  arni}^ 
His  military  abilties  were  of  a  very  high  order,  and  he  was  in 
all  matters  advised  and  consulted  by  the  Commander-in-Chief. 
On  the  nineteenth  April  they  united  in  a  last  and  energetic 
appeal  to  the  people  to  rally  to  the  standard  of  their  country. 
And  on  the  twenty-first  of  April  he  distinguished  himself  in 
the  victorious  battle  of  San  Jacinto — one  of  th  )se  great  achiev- 
ments  which  stand  out  in  prominent  immortality  on  the  page 
of  history — which  decide  tlie  issues  of  war  and  the  fate  of  na- 
tions, and  Avhicli  in  the  language  of  General  Eusk  saved  the 
country  from  the  yoke  of  bondage,  and  "  at  the  close  of  which 


13 

the  snn  of  liberty  and  independence  arose  in  Texas,  never,  it 
is  t-o  be  hoped  to  be  obscured  by  the'  chjiids  of  despotism." 
His  daring  intrepidity  in  the  assault,  and  humanity  after  the 
defeat,  won  the  admiration  of  an  army  where  all  were  brave —  ' 
all  animated  with  the  highest  impulses  of  freemen — all  elec- 
trified with  an  enthusiasm  and  a  determined  resolution  which 
could  not  fail  against  even  greater  odds  of  achieving  the  tri- 
umph. 

The  wound  of  General  Houston  having  disabled  him  from 
active  service.  Col.  Rusk  at  the  solicitation  of  the  cabinet  and 
of  the  army,  accepted,  though  at  great  personal  sacrifice,  the 
command-in-chief,  with  the  rank  of  Brigadier-General.  The 
army  was  sustained  in  a  state  of  great  efficiency,  but  there 
being  no  second  invasion  nor  active  operations  General  Rusk 
next  winter  resigned  his  position,  and  also  declined  the  office 
of  Secretary  of  State,  tendered  him  by  President  Houston,  his 
private  duties,  burthened  as  he  was  with  the  support  of  his 
own  and  the  family  of  a  brother-in-law,  requiring  his  attention. 

Let  us  pause  to  reflect  for  a  moment  on  the  character  of  the 
struggle  among  the  leading  Sj)irits  of  which  the  subject  of 
these  remarks  occupies  a  very  eminent  rank.  For  grandeur 
and  elevation  of  principle — for  purity,  fearlessness  and  lofti- 
ness of  motive  in  its  inception,  as  w^ell  as  for  gallantry  and  un- 
conquerable resolution  on  the  field  of  arms,  vre  do  not  exag- 
gerate when  we  say  that  it  was  not  surpassed  by  any  event  in 
ancient  or  modern  history.  This  was  no  war  on  the  part  of 
Texas  for  mere  gloiy — -for  spoliation  or  for  aggrandisement  on 
the  rains  of  a  weak  or  defenceless  neighbor.  This  was  a  strug- 
gle by  freemen  who  were  born  free,  for  their  country,  for  tlieir 
homes — for  liberties  secured  to  them  by  the  most  sacred  gua- 
rantees, and  which,  without  fault  on  their  part,  were  threat- 
ened with  utter  extinction. 

There  is  scarcely  an  instance  in  history  in  which  there  was 
so  vast  an  inequality  between  the  combatants,  and  the  victory 
showed  that  in  the  language  of  divine  truth,  "  the  battle  is 
not  to  the  strono;." 


14 

We  did  not  rise  against  an  oppressor  so  smitten  by  age,  or 
enfeebled  by  decay,  as  to  be  tottering  to  his  fall  Mexico  held 
undisputed  sway  over  a  vast  region  which  had  comprised  nine- 
teen States,  and  four  territories,  now  merged  into  a  strong 
central  despotism,  with  eight  millions  of  inhabitants,  with  a 
large  standing  army,  ably  officered,  fully  munitioned,  and 
thoroughly  disciplined.  Texas  was  but  a  single  province  of 
one  of  these  former  States,  with  a  j)opulation  not  amounting 
to  thirty  thousand  inhabitants,  almost  without  an  army  or 
navy  or  munitions  of  war. 

Texas  was  not  leagued  with  other  States  or  provinces  as 
were  the  American  colonics  in  1776,  capable  many  of  them, 
of  waging  and  sustaining  war,  supported  as  they  Avere  by  for- 
eign aid,  actual  and  anticipated.  She  was  alone  without 
co-operation  from  any  of  her  sister  States  or  provinces — with- 
out even  the  hope  of  support  from  any  foreign  ally,  though 
not  without  the  active  and  warmest  individual  symi^athies  of 
many  gallant  and  devoted  friends  of  liberty  in  our  native  land 
who  rallied — notwithstanding  the  pains  and  penalties  of  neu- 
trality laws — to  our  support  against  the  armed  hosts  of  des- 
potism. 

The  dark  masses  of  the  enemy  were  pouring  over  the  land, 
with  havoc  and  extermination  for  their  watchword — and  de- 
solation marking  their  path. 

The  families — the  women  and  children  and  the  whole  popu- 
lation not  under  arms,  were  fleeing  from  a  merciless  and  brutal 
soldiery  with  fearful  dread  that  the  tomahawk  and  scal])ing 
knife  of  the  savage  might  be  turned  soon  upon  them — sparing 
in  their  bloody  rage,  neither  sex,  age,  nor  innocence. 

But  the  heroic  spirits  of  Texas  quailed  not  under  these  ter- 
rific circumstances.  Their  hearts  trembled  indeed  for  their 
wives  and  children,  but  as  the  enemy  swelled  in  rage — in 
jiower — in  menaces  and  deeds  of  extermination,  so  rose  up 
high  the  spirit  of  resistance,  the  unfaltering  resolution  to  sus- 
tain the  liberties  of  their  country,  so  long  as  there  was  one 
stout  heart,  or  one  single  arm  left  to  strike  in  their  defence. 


15 

We  may  well  say  that  in  no  struggle  for  liberty,  ancient  or 
modern,  was  there  any  one  founded  on  more  just  or  substan- 
tial rights — none  more  exalted  in  the  motive — none  certainly 
more  daring  and  astonishing  in  enterprize — none  in  which  the 
high  resolve  was  more  quickly  followed  by  the  heroic  deed,  or 
in  which  the  career  of  despotism  was  crushed  by  a  more 
speedy  or  decisive  overthrow. 

We  may  say  of  the  second  of  March,  1836,  as  has  been  elo- 
quently said  of  the  fourth  of  July,  1776,  that  "  on  this  day 
a  nation  was  born  at  once — a  new  order  of  things  arose,  and 
an  illustrious  era  in  the  history  of  human  aftairs  commenced." 
Most  certainly  a  surprising  era  in  the  affairs  of  the  American 
continent  commenced  on  the  second  March,  1836.  As  the 
birth-day  of  our  own  independence,  the  day  on  which  our  lib- 
erties arose — it  cannot  be  effaced  from  our  hearts  and  recol- 
lections, nor  should  its  annual  return  be  suffered  to  pass  with- 
out festivities  and  commemorations.  Nor  can  we  remember 
without  gratitude  the  patriots  who  sustained  Texas  in  the 
hour  of  her  darkest  peril.  We  reverence  their  names,  we  do 
homage  to  their  patriotism,  their  burning  zeal  for  liberty,  and 
their  exalted  virtues.  They  rise  in  grand  and  brilliant  array 
before  the  mind  and  the  memory.  Many  have  passed  from 
this  mortal  scene.  Let  garlands  be  flung  upon  the  graves  of 
those  who  have  passed  to  eternal  life,  and  let  the  survivors 
be  crowned  with  the  respect,  the  honor  and  the  veneration 
due  to  the  fathers  of  our  liberties.  Among  the  most  illus- 
trious of  these  was  Thomas  J.  Rusk,  one  of  the  signers  of 
the  Declaration  of  Independence — the  Secretary  of  war,  when 
war  was  the  highest  object,  and  almost  the  entire  business  of 
the  G-overnment — the  sound,  the  able  adviser,  the  confiden- 
tial counsellor  of  the  Commander-in-Chief,  in  that  awful 
emergency  when  a  mistake  in  judgment — a  false  movement 
might  have  occasioned  the  most  disastrous  calamitips,  and 
been  almost  a  death  blow  to  our  national  existence,  and  final- 
ly was  among  the  most  distinguished  of  that  chivalric  band 
who  swept  the  "  minions  of  tyranny"  as  chaff  before  the  wind 
and  secured  to  Texas  her  equal  rank  among  the  nations  of  the 


16 

earth.  Can  the  name  of  Thomas  J.  Rusk  be  forgotten  ? 
Never.  His  name  is  indelibly  associated  with  and  will  endure 
as  long  as  the  liberties  of  Texas  survive.  It  will  live  as  long 
as  there  is  honor  for  exalted  patriotism  and  worth,  or  gratitude 
and  alloctionate  remi3mbrance  in  the  heart  of  man. 

1  will  now  resume  the  brief  narrative  of  some  of  the  more 
important  events  of  the  life  of  tlie  patriot,  whose  services  we 
counnemorate.  He  was  engaged  in  military  service  during  a 
portion  of  the  Summer  and  the  greater  portion  of  the  Fall  and 
Winter  of  1838.  In  August,  1838,  a  rebellion  of  the  Mexi- 
cans in  the  vicinity  of  Nacogdoches  was  suppressed  by  troops 
under  his  command,  and,  about  the  same  time,  he  pursued  a 
band  of  hostile  Caddoes,  and  disarmed  them  within  the  limits 
of  the  United  States.  In  October,  1838,  at  the  head  of  two 
hundred  men,  he  defeated,  after  a  sharp  engagement,  the  war- 
riors of  Kickapoo,  a  brave  tribe  of  Indians,  and,  on  the  15th 
and  16th  of  July,  1839,  at  the  head  of  a  regiment,  a  portion 
of  the  forces  under  the  command  of  Brigadier  Grcneral  Douglass 
against  the  Cherokees,  he  was  found  in  the  thickest  of  the 
battles,  and,  by  his  daring  and  intrepidity,  adding  new  laurels 
to  the  brightness  of  his  fame. 

In  the  meantime,  in  December,  1838,  he  had  been  elected 
Chief  Justice  of  the  Supreme  Court,  and,  being  absent  on 
military  service,  perhaps  not  apprised  of  his  election,  no  term 
of  the  Court  was  held  in  1839.  Pie  i)resided  at  Austin  in 
1840,  being  tlie  first  term  at  which  there  was  a  quorum  of 
the  Court  in  attendance.  He  resigned  during  that  year,  and 
resumed  a  vridelj'-extended,  important  and  lucrative  practice 
of  the  L^w. 

In  1843,  he  was  elected  Major  General  of  the  militia — an 
office  with  extensive  powers,  which,  after  a  short  period,  ho 
resigned. 

But  the  political  condition  of  Texas  was  now  about  to 
undergo  an  important  change.  A  revolution  (peaceful,  in 
deed,)  was  to  take  from  her  a  portion  of  her  national  sover- 
eignty and  independence,  and  iucorj^orate  her  as  one  of  the 


17 

States  of  the  great  Confederacy  of  the  United  States.  Gen. 
KusK  was  a  warm  friend  of  annexation,  from  its  incipiency, 
in  all  its  forms,  and,  in  1845,  lie  was  elected  a  member  of  the 
Convention,  to  frame  the  Constitution  of  the  State.  Of  that 
Body  he  was  unanimously  declared  the  President,  and  served 
in  that  office  with  unsurpassed  dignity,  impartiality  and  abil- 
ity. He  did  not  confine  himself  to  the  duties  of  presiding 
officer,  but  mingled,  frequently,  in  the  debates  on  important 
measures,  and  his  clear  conceptions,  comprehensive  views, 
forcible  eloquence,  and  conservative  tendencies,  with  his  weight 
of  character,  exerted  a  powerful  influence  in  the  deliberations 
of  the  Convention. 

On  the  annexation  of  Texas,  he  was,  in  1846,  with  great 
unanimity,  elected  one  of  her  Eepresentatives  in  the  United 
States'  Senate — an  office,  which,  under  the  then  existing  cir- 
cumstances, was  felt  to  be  of  the  deepest  importance  to  the 
welfare  of  the  State.  He  was  twice  re-elected,  and  such  was 
his  influential  position  in  that  august  Body,  and  the  estima- 
tion in  which  he  was  held  by  his  fellow  Senators,  that  he  was 
elected  President,  pro  tern,  of  the  Senate,  on  the  last  day  of 
its  late  session — this,  the  closing  event  of  his  Senatorial 
career,  being  one  of  the"  highest  testimonials  that  could  be 
offered  to  his  abilities  and  to  his  worth,  moral  and  intellectual. 

I  shall  not  attempt  to  recapitulate  the  political  events  occur- 
ring during  the  period  of  his  Senatorshiji.  His  name,  during 
the  eleven  years  of  his  service,  has  been  identified  with  some 
of  the  most  important  transactions  that  have  transpired  since 
the  formation  of  the  American  Union.  One  of  transcendant 
importance  was  the  question  of  our  Eio  Grande  Boundary, 
which,  in  1850,  assumed  an  aspect  of  complex  difficulty,  and, 
at  one  time,  of  the  grossest  outrage,  and  even  of  appalling 
danger  to  the  State  of  Texas.  The  Eio  Grande  line  had 
always  been  proclaimed  and  asserted  by  Texas.  It  was  not 
distm'bed  by  the  measure  of  annexation,  but  was  substantially 
enforced  by  the  United  States  in  their  war  with  Mexico,  and 
was  admitted  by  the  United  States,  especially  the  Executive 


I 


^w'- 


18 

Depaitmeiil,  up  to  1850.  It  was  then  diBputed,  and,  at  one 
time,  repudiated  by  the  United  States.  The  question  pre- 
sented various  shapes  of  compromise — of  threatened  war,  with- 
out compromise,  if  Texas  attempted  to  enforce  her  jurisdic- 
tion ;  and  of  compromise  with  the  threatened  enforcement  of 
the  hostile  claims  of  the  United  States  in  the  event  of  Texas 
declining  to  accept  the  proposition.  The  question  was  also 
complicated,  or  attempted  to  be  entangled,  with  other  issues 
between  the  northern  and  southern  sections  of  the  Union. 

The  crisis  demanded  of  our  Representatives  the  highest 
degree  of  boldness,  promptitude  and  solidity  of  judgment, 
profound  sagacity,  extended  views  of  results  immediate  and 
remote,  and  an  equanimity,  which  neither  the  injustice  nor 
the  menaces  of  enemies,  nor  the  taunts  of  friends,  (who  were 
not  unwilling  that  Texas  should  become  the  theatre,  perhaps 
bl9ody,  for  the  settlement  of  sectional  issues,)  could  disturb 
or  excite  into  such  passion  as  might  endanger  the  true  inter- 
ests of  the  State.  These,  and  other  great  qualities,  were 
found  in  Gen.  Rusk.  He  had  also  commanding  personal 
influence— was  devoted,  with  the  warmest  and  strongest 
attachment,  to  the  Union,  but  with  his  primal  affections  for 
his  own  State,  which,  he  declared,  was  entitled  "  to  the  first 
and  last  drop  of  blood  that  ran  in  his  veins,  in  defence  of  her 
just  rights  against  all  opposition,  however  formidable." 

For  eight  long  months  was  this  exciting,  dangerous  ques- 
tion (in  connection  with  others,)  the  subject  of  debate  by  the 
great  statesmen  and  orators  of  the  American  Senate.  On 
numerous  occasions,  and  at  all  proper  times,  did  Gen.  Rusk, 
in  clear,  strong,  emphatic  terms,  and  with  undeniable  facts 
and  conclusive  arguments,  vindicate  the  justice  of  our  claims, 
solemnly  admonishing  the  country  of  the  dangerous  conse- 
quences of  any  violent  infraction  of  our  rights,  as  the  State, 
against  all  opposition,  would  resist  injustice  and  oppression  to 
the  end — refuting  objections,  and  repelling'  the  unfounded 
assumptions  of  the  adversary  claim.  The  decision  of  his 
character,  the  ability  and  straight-forward  earnestness  of  his 


19 

arguments,  had  great  efficiency  in  producing  the  final  result 
of  an  honorable  compromise,  for  which  he  voted,  and  which 
was  afterwards  accepted  by  an  immense  majority  of  the  people 
of  the  State.  And  thus  was  settled  a  most  perilous  contro- 
versy, which  threatened,  at  one  period,  to  deluge  the  State 
in  blood,  and,  in  its  ultimate  consequences,  to  destroy  the 
Union  itself. 

It  might  be  deemed  unjust,  in  this  connection,  not  to  allude 
to  the  cordial  co-operation  between  our  Senators  in  all  the 
measm'es  connected  with  the  Boundary  question  ;  and  that,  in 
all  its  stages — and  in  its  darkest  perils,  the  commanding  abili- 
ties of  Gen.  Houston,  his  prudence,  eloquence,  energies  and 
influence,  were  exerted  with  powerful  effect  to  sustain  the 
honor,  the  rights,  the  safety,  and  the  interests  of  the  State, — ■ 
and  that  these  were  most  ably,  eloquently  and  earnestly  illus- 
trated, vindicated  and  sustained  by  Messrs.  Kaufman  and 
Howard,  in  the  House  of  Kepresentatives. 

In  the  progress  of  this  debate,  on  the  twenty-eighth  day  of 
February,  1850,  Mr.  Rusk  gave  an  exposition  of  his  views  on 
the  subject  of  non-intervention,  and  strenuously  maintained 
that  the  slave-holding  States  have  an  equal  share  with  the 
other  States  in  the  Territories  of  the  United  States,  and  an 
equal  right  to  remove  there  with  their  slaves  as  their  property ; 
that  the  Territories  were,  in  fact,  open  to  all — to  be  equally 
enjoyed  by  all  sections  of  the  Union. 

This  great  doctrine  of  non-intervention,  or  the  equality  of 
rights  and'  privileges  of  the  several  States  in  the  Territories  of 
the  United  States,  he,  four  years  afterwards,  affirmed  by  his 
vote  on  the  Kansas  and  Nebraska  Bill ;  and  it  was  again  and 
emphatically  asserted  by  him  in  the  debates  at  the  last  session 
of  Congress. 

There  were  many  other  important  measures  and  principles 
with  which  he  was  identified,  but  which  cannot,  within  the 
limits  of  this  Eulogy,  be  enumerated. 

As  Chairman  of  the  committee  on  Post  Offices  and  Post 
Roads,  he  had  an  intiniato  knowledge  of  the  Postal  arrange- 


20 

mentB  and  wants  of  the  country.  And  so  deeply  was  his  loss 
deplored  by  the  Department,  that  the  Post  Master  General, 
in  an  official  letter,  has  paid  a  feeling  and  aflfecting  tribute  to 
his  character  and  memory. 

His  deep  interest  in  railroad  improvements,  and  his  efforts  \ 
and  services  in  giving  an  impulse  to  the  great  line  which  is  to  / 
span  the  continent,  and  link  the  Atlantic  and  Pacific  together  i 
as  with  bands  of  iron,  were  most  important,  but  are  too  famil-  i 
iar  to  have  been  forgotten,  or  even  obscured  in  the  recollection. 

He  was  rarely  absent  fi-om  his  post  in  the  Senate.  With 
untiring  assiduity  he  examined  thoroughly  the  questions  before 
that  body,  and  his  opinion  when  formed,  especially  on  subjects 
before  Committees  to  which  he  was  attached,  had  a  force  almost 
irresistible. 

No  man  ever  served  in  public  life  more  entirely  free  from 
even  the  suspicion  of  corrupt,  mercenary,  or  improper  motives. 
With  integrity,  purity  and  singleness  of  purpose,  he  devoted 
his  great  talents  to  his  country,  unswerved  by  selfish  designs, 
or  the  impulses  of  an  ill-regulated  ambition.     He  was  endowed 
with  moral  courage  in  an  eminent  degree.     As  an  illustration,  on     / 
the  Boundary  question,  he  expressed  his  determination  to  vote 
for  a  proi3osition  which  he  thought  Texas  might  with  honor 
accejyt,  though  from  information  on  which  he  relied,  he  felt 
conscious  that  by  such  vote,  he  would  forfeit  his  seat  in  the 
Senate.     This  anticipation,  happily  for  the  country,  proved  to 
be  groundless.     Texas  did  accept  the  proposition.     But  his    , 
resolution  showed  that  even  against  a  justly  indignant  public    [ 
sentiment — ^but  exasperated  in  his  opinion  to  such  a  degree  as     \ 
to  be  deaf  to  the  sugestions  of  prudence — he  had  a  spirit  which      | 
could  boldly  stand  up  for  what  he  deemed  the  true  honor  and       ' 
interests  of  the  State,  though  at  the  risk,  nay,  the  certainty  oi 
the  sacrifice  of  himself. 

He  was  generous,  magnanimous,  brave  and  humane.  He 
was  largely  endowed  with  that  fine  electric  quality  which  seems 
the  gift  of  nature — the  result,  perhaps,  of  a  rare  combination 
of  the  higher  qualities  of  the  intellect  and  of  the  heart,  which 


21 

inspires  confidence,  and  exerts  in  a  mystical  way,  a  control  over 
surrounding  persons,  wMch  exacts  obedience  from  a  soldier 
more  from  attachment  and  a  high  and  implicit  trust,  than  from 
the  force  of  discipline,  which  in  the  hour  of  danger,  draws  all 
to  him  as  the  pilot  who  must  weather  the  storm  ;  which  arbi- 
trates and  settles  the  difiiculties  of  others,  makes  friends  every- 
where without  effort,  and  in  legislative  assemblies,  gives  an 
influence  which  no  mere  talent,  intellect,  energy  or  efforts  to 
please  can  ever  possess. 

Gen.  KuSK  had  all  the  essentials  of  genuine  eloquence,  j 
He  mastered  the  strong  points  of  the  subject — had  clear  con-  ■■ 
ceptions,  sound  practical  common  sense  views.  These  were 
expressed  with  clearness,  force,  simplicity,  directness,  and  with 
a  bold  and  impassioned  earnestness  if  requiredby  the  occasion, 
and  these,  aided  by  his  lofty  presence,  full  voice  and  beaming 
and  expressive  countenance,  seldom  failed  or  to  propel  the  minds 
of  his  hearers  before  him,  and  produce  conviction,  the  object 
of  all  eloquence. 

Without  discussing  particularly  his  character  as  a  Lawyer 
and  as  a  Judge,  we  may  say  that  he  combined  the  important 
elements  necessary  to  constitute  a  great  Lawyer.  He  had  a 
thorough  knowledge  of  the  principles  of  the  Law — a  vast 
fund  of  common  sense,  a  familiar  acquaintance  with  the  springs 
of  human  action — a  spirit  of  investigation  carried  to  any  ex- 
tent required  to  enable  him  to  master  the  great  points  in  the 
facts  and  law  of  the  cause.  These  were  presented  with  great 
force  of  logic  and  with  an  earnestness  and  directness  which, 
very  generally  imbued  the  minds  or  the  jurors  or  tribunals, 
with  his  own  impulses  and  views,  and  gave  him  a  success  sur- 
passed by  none  if  reached  by  any  of  the  many  eminent  gen- 
tlemen who  were  his  cotemporaries  in  the  practice,  and  who 
by  their  abilities,  learning  and  worth,  were  ornaments  at  once 
of  the  profession  and  of  their  country. 

As  a  Judge,  his  career  was  too  brief  to  form  an  important 
featm-e  in  the  figure  of  his  life.  He  presided  at  but  one  Term 
of  the  Supreme  Court,  at  which,  in  the  consultation  room  and 


22 

ill  his  opinions,  lie  gave  abundant  evidence  of  capacities  for 
high  judicial  eminence — capacities  which  were  developed  with 
such  grandeur  and  brightness  in  other  spheres  of  public  service. 

When  the  grave  closes  over  men  full  of  years  and  honors, 
who  have  reached  the  verge  of  human  life,  theu'  death,  as  all 
the  ends  of  living  had  been  attained,  does  not  affect  us  with 
a  deep  sense  of  loss  or  calamity.  But  the  subject  of  these 
remarks  was  stricken  from  existence  many  years  before  the 
allotted  period  of  human  life.  He  was  in  the  mid  career  of 
his  usefulness — he  might  have  reasonably  anticipated  the 
highest  honors  in  the  gift  of  the  Government,  His  name  had 
been  prominent  on  occasions  as  a  candidate  for  the  Presidency. 
A  laudable  ambition  in  one  who  like  him,  had  the  requisite 
capacities,  he  sought  not  the  office  by  schemes  and  contri- 
vances, or  by  efforts,  having  that  object  in  view  as  their  imme- 
diate or  ultimate  effects.  While  he  sought  not,  he  would  not 
have  declined  the  trust,  and  notwithstanding  an  innate  modesty 
and  diffidence  which  required  the  stimulus  of  friendship  to 
induce  him  to  accept  office,  yet  tJie  current  of  public  opin- 
ion in  his  favor  was  increasing  with  such  volume  and  force, 
the  confidence  in  his  abilities,  integrity  and  patriotism  was 
deepening  and  widening  so  rapidly  that,  had  he  lived,  he  would 
most  probably  have  been  promoted  to  the  most  exalted  station 
by  the  voice  of  a  grateful  and  admiring  country.  His  sudden 
death  under  these  circumstances,  is  a  painful  shock  to  the  sen- 
sibilities of  the  mind.  It  is  felt  as  an  untimely  stroke,  as  a 
national  calamity,  betokening  we  know  not  what  of  evil  or 
misfortune. 

In  his  private  relations,  he  was  hospitable  and  kind,  beloved 
of  all  his  neighbors.  He  lived  in  patriarchal  simplicity.  All 
were  welcome  at  his  house,  the  humblest  visited  him,  and  were 
equally  welcome  and  at  home  with  the  richest  and  greatest  of 
the  land.  In  the  words  of  a  friend,  benevolence  and  kindness 
were  more  conspicuous  in  him  than  in  any  man  he  ever  knew. 
He  was  deeply  affectionate  and  tender  in  his  family  circle  ;  no 
word  of  unkindiiess  to  any  member  of  his  family  was  ever 
heard  to  flow  from  his  lips.     His  wife,  the  partner  of  his  bosom 


23 

in  youth  and  in  age,  in  misfortune  and  in  prosperity,  was  clier-    ; 
islied  by  him  with  an  indescribable  fervor  and  depth  of  tender-     1 
ness,  love  and  aifection,  and  her  death  in  the  previous  year  was    | 
a  blow  to  his  heart  from  which  he  never  recovered.     But  it 
avails  not  to  enumerate  his  virtues,  public  or  private,  or  his 
services,  or  the  hopes  of  his  country  untimely  blighted.     He 
is  gone  !  so  far  as  a  great  man  who  lives  in  the  imperishable 
records  of  his  country's  history  can  die.     He  has  left  us  a  bright 
heritage  of  Liberties  won  by  his  valor,  and  sustained  and  in- 
vigorated by  the  wisdom  of  his  councils,  and  he  has  left  a 
glorious  example  of  exalted  abilities  and  noble  virtues  all 
devoted  to  the  service  of  his  country. 

The  manner  of  his  death  is  the  only  shade  on  the  grand  and 
brilliant  picture  of  his  long,  glorious  and  useful  life.     He  had    f 
been  weak  and  sick  for  some  time — the  death  of  his  wife  had   \ 
been  to  him  a  crushing  affliction — his  grief  acting  through  the     ' 
disordered  state  of  his  phj'sical  condition,  produced  such  an 
increasing  degree  of  gloom  and  melancholy,  as  finally  to  weaken 
the  control  of  reason,  and  in  a  moment  of  temporary  insanity 
to  produce  the  melancholy  catastrophe  which  has  filled  the 
country  with  lamentation  and  w^oe.     Let  the  tears  of  sym23athy 
flow  for  this  suddea  collapse  of  one  of  the  finest  of  mental 
organizations,  striking  as  it  did  from  life  and  from  his  country 
forever,  one  of  her  most  illustrious  and  venerated  Patriots  and 
Statesman. 

Death  cometh  to  all  as  surely  as  the  sun  runneth  his  daily 
course,  but  it  cannot  obliterate  the  services  which  this  great 
man  has  rendered  to  his  country.  It  cannot  diminish  the 
brightness  of  his  memory,  shining  as  a  star  in  the  political 
heavens,  and  exerting  for  ages  in  the  future  its  benign  agency 
over  the  political  destinies  of  the  people.  But,  fellow-citizens, .  • 
I  will  not  attempt  to  detain  you  longer  by  this  feeble  tribute 
to  the  memory  of  the  deceased.  We  may  not  look  on  his  like 
again.  His  place  may  be  filled,  but  who  can  fill  the  void  in 
the  hearts  of  his  countrymen.  We  may,  however,  attempt  to 
imitate  his  example,  to  emulate  his  virtues,  to  love  our  country 


24 

with  devoted,  uncalculating  affection,  to  give  it  our  hearts  and 
souls,  and  if  necessary,  "the  first  and  the  last  drop  of  blood 
that  runs  in  our  veins,"  to  sustain  the  honor  and  rights  of  our 
beloved  State  against  all  opposition  and  to  every  extremity, 
and  to  fervently  hope  with  him  that  this  mighty,  this  growing 
Republic,  may  be  perpetuated  over  a  people  enjoying  all  the 
blessings  of  Liberty,  and  all  the  benelicient  glories  of  a  union 
of  patriotic  fraternal  feeling,  and  of  constitutional  and  equal 
rights. 


IE  N  10 


1^